| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 174315307 (Comments: 1) | Jarred Els (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please check this video Mapping buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M commented 2025-12-01 14:12:55 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175151369 (Comments: 1) | 2007Lucas (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, thanks for mapping. Please do not map buildings as a residential area. Buildings Building=yes! Be more accurate and do not connect or cross other objects. Best regards, and keep mapping. Check this out: See this video. For bu... commented 2025-12-01 14:11:08 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
 | 175351891 (Comments: 2) | AK_2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I have reverted your changeset because it added too many duplicates to the live map data with incorrect values. I kept/restored the nodes that appear to be new elements. I'm not sure how you are surveying these locations, bu... commented 2025-12-01 14:07:23 UTC by HellMap ♦759 |
 | 174300962 (Comments: 2) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Bonjour, Vous avez surement raison, mais j'ai malheureusement touché au farmland parce qu'il avait été dessiné accolé à une route ou chemin sinon je ne l'aurai pas modifié. Ensuite os... commented 2025-12-01 14:03:03 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
 | 174526748 (Comments: 3) | kitsee (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is it written on ground? I thought about this good practice otherwise: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things commented 2025-12-01 14:00:47 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦161 |
 | 175356813 (Comments: 1) | R-MEDIA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć! Jeżeli w budynku szkoły mieści się klub taekwondo, to należy dodać go jako punkt - w części budynku, w której się znajduje. Zakładam, że chodzi o salę gimnastyczną? commented 2025-12-01 14:00:28 UTC by czebureks ♦134 |
| 174626514 (Comments: 1) | ErikaBraunn (Discussed changesets: 1) | On this task, the high-rise buildings are often incorrectly mapped. You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more . Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 buildi... commented 2025-12-01 13:56:50 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
 | 74224311 (Comments: 2) | Mirecnet (Discussed changesets: 139) | Ano, existuje to. Ide o zasypanu priepast - zavrt ktorej poloha je zachatena v literature commented 2025-12-01 13:56:33 UTC by Mirecnet ♦108 |
 | 175306572 (Comments: 5) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ich habe mal ein wenig im Netz gesucht und bin auf die offiziellen Bekanntgaben [1] speziell zu den Treffpunkten in dieser VG gestoßen. Danach war die Benennung durch CaptainCarte in Version 1 korrekt. Falls der Name zu lang ist,... commented 2025-12-01 13:55:58 UTC by berndw ♦631 |
| 160435646 (Comments: 2) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 79) | Réponse sur le commentaire https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158984617#c1519300 commented 2025-12-01 13:39:49 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,169 |
| 158984617 (Comments: 1) | JJJWegdam (Discussed changesets: 135) | Hello. When you replace a closed way by a multipolygon, you need to make sure that any relation using that way points to the multipolygon instead. In the case of railway platforms, the route and stop_area relations should be updated to point to th... commented 2025-12-01 13:38:47 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,169 |
| 175350199 (Comments: 5) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 105) | Może niech już tak zostanie commented 2025-12-01 13:38:12 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦811 |
| 175331070 (Comments: 1) | Kavish Kardile (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please map only required objects. Buildings and highways. Best regards commented 2025-12-01 13:35:21 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 173219362 (Comments: 1) | tabea222 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Please check this video about higher buildings. For buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. Best regards commented 2025-12-01 13:26:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175352769 (Comments: 1) | PeterHrcka (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please check this footage on how to map See this video. For buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. commented 2025-12-01 13:24:44 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
 | 175325984 (Comments: 6) | RobertGW (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted adding historical names as currently used - for example see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150812648/history - "plac Krakowski" is no longer its name https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175357445 commented 2025-12-01 13:17:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175357212 (Comments: 1) | PulisakZ (Discussed changesets: 52) | Thanks! :) commented 2025-12-01 13:13:16 UTC by Waaslander ♦60 |
| 175356505 (Comments: 1) | shoy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-12-01 13:11:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175218318 (Comments: 9) | Dodko (Discussed changesets: 41) | Zaujímavé že tento smer dáva mimo diaľnice https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=49.179165%2C18.725359%3B49.132637%2C18.899703#map=13/49.17149/18.80602 commented 2025-12-01 13:10:24 UTC by Dodko ♦1,273 |
 | 174406648 (Comments: 4) | lpf452 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 收到了你的建议，谢谢。待全线通车后我会再对其进行一次 survey，届时更新 'name'信息 commented 2025-12-01 13:06:19 UTC by lpf452 ♦5 |
 | 169708096 (Comments: 4) | AwFi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Se vuoi aggiungi pure, ma non mi pare fosse indoor, più che altro covered. commented 2025-12-01 13:04:33 UTC by AwFi ♦40 |
| 174600765 (Comments: 1) | szedar (Discussed changesets: 27) | zerkniesz na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edycja-numerow-telefonicznych/138759 ? commented 2025-12-01 12:58:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175169725 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 109) | pewnie poza tymi miejscami gdzie horse= jest już ustawione... commented 2025-12-01 12:56:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 172838165 (Comments: 1) | tilsti (Discussed changesets: 0) | Hallo, ich habe diesen Änderungssatz in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175356541 revertiert. Die großen Fernradwege werden als Superrouten modelliert. Diese enthalten keine Way-Member für die einzelnen Stra&szli... commented 2025-12-01 12:56:33 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,168 |
 | 155386239 (Comments: 3) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 7) | thanks! commented 2025-12-01 12:52:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 108435750 (Comments: 11) | Friendly_Ghost (Discussed changesets: 176) | Why are people this butthurt over a big bbox spanning their country?? commented 2025-12-01 12:51:33 UTC by Sharko_J ♦96 |
 | 175349497 (Comments: 13) | hansbokma (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oke Hans. Top! commented 2025-12-01 12:47:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
 | 174750057 (Comments: 5) | Lockstar (Discussed changesets: 67) | i see, thanks. should be all correct now, appreciate your help commented 2025-12-01 12:45:24 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦423 |
| 175237557 (Comments: 2) | MartorCZ (Discussed changesets: 21) | report of #mapycom user: Mapa pokazuje w Alei Krakowskiej ograniczenie do 90 km/h w rzeczywistości jest 50km/h. Then i checked it on Streetview. commented 2025-12-01 12:39:19 UTC by MartorCZ ♦15 |
 | 175268301 (Comments: 4) | Andreasl01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The wiki is a result of what all mappers together use in the map. That process becomes broken if the wiki is used the other way around. In the wiki, a few people make decisions. In the map, however, everyone decides. See it like vot... commented 2025-12-01 12:35:11 UTC by goedegazelle ♦246 |
 | 174901628 (Comments: 2) | Vest-Agder-museet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thank you for commenting. The (outdoor) museum area cross several public roads and are located in 3 different clusters. I have made some changes to try to give an exact layout of the museum area. Thank you. commented 2025-12-01 12:26:35 UTC by Vest-Agder-museet ♦1 |
 | 153415081 (Comments: 2) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 160) | Very true, indeed. But what is the purpose of flagging my changeset as erroneous? What mistake are you reporting here specifically? commented 2025-12-01 12:19:09 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,654 |
| 175354516 (Comments: 1) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | Beste Joho Je gaat in hoog tempo door maar kijkt nauwelijks of iets wel goed is gegaan? Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175354516 De landuse heb ik weer hersteld. warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway Ook hers... commented 2025-12-01 12:10:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
 | 149218095 (Comments: 1) | teatime456 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi teatime456, an wen hat der Eigentümer das gemeldet? Sprich, bist du von einer Organisation bzw. Firma - dann das zukünftig bitte bekanntgeben. Des weiteren: Gab es auch eine Begründung warum hier angeblich das freie Betretungs... commented 2025-12-01 12:09:42 UTC by PPete2 ♦135 |
| 175354135 (Comments: 1) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag joho.. Probeer eens te reageren op opmerkingen. Gebruik de adresnode svp om op bij te taggen MVG eggie commented 2025-12-01 12:03:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175352821 (Comments: 3) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 10) | merci beaucoup commented 2025-12-01 12:02:08 UTC by eurelien ♦8 |
| 175311678 (Comments: 1) | atyndall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, there appears to be an overlap here https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.81914&lat=-31.97845&zoom=15 commented 2025-12-01 12:01:26 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
 | 175354055 (Comments: 1) | Antplanproje (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 487 of your last 500 changes were deletions. This is quite... commented 2025-12-01 11:56:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
 | 43478725 (Comments: 2) | Gummireddybharath (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, Gujarat is not a city and if we're talking about this company: https://www.indofil.com/contact/india-office then I see no location in Dahej commented 2025-12-01 11:52:44 UTC by aki007 ♦11 |
 | 175339959 (Comments: 2) | szkwok (Discussed changesets: 2) | I don't know what you are doing. But you should multi-select by holding [Shift] as usual. commented 2025-12-01 11:51:16 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175349626 (Comments: 1) | Pablo Strubell (Discussed changesets: 9) | Are you sure? DB01A and DB01R are at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13063226270 , and route_ref should not go into `name` anyway. commented 2025-12-01 11:49:36 UTC by kingkingHK ♦32 |
| 175353873 (Comments: 1) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | Beste Dit lijkt me allemaal niet coorect. Iets beschrijven doe je niet met name= Dus geen name=schoolplein De amenity=school hoort eenmalig te worden getagd op het terrein of op de adresnode of evt op het gebouw. Het staat nu 3x op de kaart. <... commented 2025-12-01 11:46:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175353460 (Comments: 3) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | De basisschool staat nu twee keer in de database van OSM. De adresnode lijkt me voldoende. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-01 11:41:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
 | 166999774 (Comments: 4) | gymate (Discussed changesets: 20) | Szuper, köszi szépen az intézkedést! :) Kézzel javítottam is a branchet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175353347 commented 2025-12-01 11:28:59 UTC by gymate ♦39 |
| 175353146 (Comments: 1) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | De landuse heb ik aangepast naar een doorlopende polygoon en niet meer een los stuk 'inner' multipolygoon. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-01 11:26:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175353013 (Comments: 1) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-01 11:22:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175350303 (Comments: 1) | RW-Airconditioning (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode en het verschoven gebouw hersteld. Uw edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175350303 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-01 11:21:02 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 168695631 (Comments: 2) | Aleksander | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 28) | Cześć, tak. Wprowadziłem zmiany commented 2025-12-01 11:15:23 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦86 |
 | 175339622 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 200) | que cambios hiciste en esas lineas? commented 2025-12-01 11:11:55 UTC by i2004 ♦169 |
| 175343935 (Comments: 1) | Vicolapatat (Discussed changesets: 7) | Les écoles sont cartographiées individuellement au sein de la zone, cette modification créée donc un double codage. Je vais annuler. commented 2025-12-01 10:56:24 UTC by Ltrlg ♦94 |
 | 171645721 (Comments: 2) | SemYakimov (Discussed changesets: 9) | Добрый день! Был там в начале сентября. После дождей на тропах было много воды, в том числе и южнее Трёх Батьев. Сложно оценить, всегда там ... commented 2025-12-01 10:52:38 UTC by SemYakimov ♦14 |
| 175350787 (Comments: 2) | Wooshness (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pad met routerelaties hersteld https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175351709 commented 2025-12-01 10:46:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,505 |
| 175240903 (Comments: 2) | NdwMan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo NdwMan, als Namen erfassen wir nur Eigennamen. Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen Viele Grüße Michael commented 2025-12-01 10:46:34 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,168 |
| 175326561 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bist du dir sicher mit den Bürgersteigen in der verkehrsberuhigten Zone? Eine vbZ ist eigentlich ein gemeinsam genutzter Bereich. Die Fußwege hinter den Parkplätzen kann ich ja verstehen, aber z.B. den hier: https://www.openstreetmap.... commented 2025-12-01 10:41:12 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,440 |
| 150686794 (Comments: 2) | Jack Boschert (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, it is tagged as place=neighbourhood which is part of a suburb: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=neighbourhood so I would not expect to see it on a list of suburbs. commented 2025-12-01 10:31:48 UTC by TheSwavu ♦570 |
| 160584008 (Comments: 2) | joooostbrnd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Beschreibung und Lage des AED passen nicht zusammen. Bitte überprüfen commented 2025-12-01 10:30:35 UTC by Markus366 ♦190 |
| 85730266 (Comments: 2) | Schramme (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ich hab mir beim letzten Vorbeikommen ein Foto gemacht. Das Schild scheint mal geändert worden zu sein: yes @ (Mo-Fr 18:30-10:00,Sa 18:30-Mo 10:00) Ich hab's in OSM auch geändert. Danke für's aufmersam machen. commented 2025-12-01 10:30:02 UTC by Schramme ♦34 |
 | 149785058 (Comments: 1) | jemmimport (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, this doesn't look right: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271222518/history Maybe an error? commented 2025-12-01 10:28:07 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦18 |
 | 174794510 (Comments: 2) | Miui Cat (Discussed changesets: 1) | how do I change it commented 2025-12-01 10:27:40 UTC by Miui Cat ♦1 |
| 175277031 (Comments: 1) | motogs (Discussed changesets: 13) | In the sources I should have included BHF’s ‘The Circuit’ database (but only for the UUID of the AED - as permitted by BHF) commented 2025-12-01 10:24:53 UTC by motogs ♦28 |
| 174811077 (Comments: 2) | kitsee (Discussed changesets: 14) | Morning, Unfortunately this is the first I've heard of the changes to power=circuit or the July proposal. I'll look into making the changes however the next grid is almost finished so i may commit that how it is. I'll also look int... commented 2025-12-01 10:24:35 UTC by kitsee ♦115 |
| 175349314 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-01 10:11:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175285003 (Comments: 13) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 105) | Od razy mówię, że ten trunk wycofam. Chyba, że przeprowadzisz dyskusję na forum i chcesz to rozwiązać demokratycznie, bo na argumenty zawsze przegrasz w tej sytuacji. commented 2025-12-01 10:06:19 UTC by Yunkers ♦401 |
| 174540987 (Comments: 1) | gonein60sec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). You can add full address details on tags. Take care not to edit other entities like GBA, w... commented 2025-12-01 09:58:16 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
 | 167754618 (Comments: 1) | PakitOliva (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, por favor infórmate bien sobre la forma de editar líneas eléctricas y evita hacerlo si no lo tienes claro. Editarlas con etiquetado incorrecto y no completarlas correctamente genera problemas en el mapa y es difícil ... commented 2025-12-01 09:56:58 UTC by kapazao ♦945 |
| X | 175347233 (Comments: 1) | danill2001 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you include a random node in the US along with your other changes in Russia? commented 2025-12-01 09:53:57 UTC by Maplev ♦12 |
| 171321881 (Comments: 3) | Der Wilderer (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hallo, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Ja, ich meinte die K46 / Wilhelmsthaler Str. Gut möglich, dass da noch gesperrt ist. Vielen Dank und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen :) David commented 2025-12-01 09:53:21 UTC by dadavid ♦515 |
| 175345767 (Comments: 1) | adas (Discussed changesets: 74) | Zastosuj się, proszę, do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad nazywania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-01 09:52:58 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175348239 (Comments: 1) | bjnk954 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Znów nie stosujesz się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad nazywania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-01 09:50:15 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 131797265 (Comments: 2) | hu9o (Discussed changesets: 16) | Yes it was a typo, thanks for the edit commented 2025-12-01 09:43:52 UTC by hu9o ♦85 |
| 175206387 (Comments: 3) | solcarlus5 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Bonjour, Je me base sur le consensus en France (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France) et à l'international (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Highway:International_equivalence). Le type de highway ... commented 2025-12-01 09:39:41 UTC by divaddivag ♦126 |
| 173136516 (Comments: 1) | droopy66 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour ! Les panneaux indicateurs routiers peuvent être cartographiés avec traffic_sign=destination Le wiki indique que les tags tourism=information + information=guidepost sont quant à eux destinés aux panne... commented 2025-12-01 09:36:39 UTC by cquest ♦278 |
| 174735559 (Comments: 3) | kdom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, merci pour l'info Attention, toutes les données du géoportail ne peuvent pas être utilisé pour contribuer à osm. Pour confirmer, vous pouvez utiliser le calque BDTopo dans l'éditeur ou rega... commented 2025-12-01 09:35:20 UTC by jbcharron ♦142 |
 | 168078513 (Comments: 5) | VicVal (Discussed changesets: 8) | @VicVal Vil denne side være en løsning for jeres historik: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ commented 2025-12-01 09:33:25 UTC by b-holdet ♦334 |
| 175197290 (Comments: 3) | solcarlus5 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Merci pour votre retour. Je vous rassure je ne suis pas le gardien du temple ni doit décider des choix d'édition des autres contributeurs. Je m'excuse si cela a pu être interprété ainsi. Pour ce type d'... commented 2025-12-01 09:33:05 UTC by divaddivag ♦126 |
| 159765552 (Comments: 2) | Bierphysik (Discussed changesets: 20) | danke 🤦♂️ commented 2025-12-01 09:28:08 UTC by Bierphysik ♦93 |
| 175220587 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 72) | Oh, and, as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5070064 , we still need someone to go look at how the building is like because it's covered in scaffolding, but for now I am quite hopeful ref=H is entirely unaffected. commented 2025-12-01 09:15:16 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦67 |
 | 175113596 (Comments: 3) | Priscilla Kapolo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi You remove the local post office in "志學". I should be in that location according to post office website You can just adjust the building outline, not removing the whole poi from the map. --- ... commented 2025-12-01 09:09:19 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 174996846 (Comments: 1) | ozjustbc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1450938379. Did you mean fieldcomplex instead of feildcomplex? commented 2025-12-01 09:05:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175346545 (Comments: 1) | Joshwa_D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for mapping Joshwa! You can square the sides of buildings easily with the Q button if you have clicked on the building outline. Thanks again commented 2025-12-01 09:03:18 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175345174 (Comments: 3) | Michelle Wang MPIA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Building looks much better now :) commented 2025-12-01 09:03:16 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 175344411 (Comments: 1) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 958) | Bonjour, Je trouve ça un peu étonnant de procéder à la suppression de l'existant sans le remplacer par des données plus à jour Certaines notes peuvent rester ouvertes des années, de... commented 2025-12-01 09:01:34 UTC by atchisson ♦20 |
| 175346559 (Comments: 1) | Purva R (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice work Purva R ! Really well mapped commented 2025-12-01 08:59:51 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175346583 (Comments: 1) | Michelle Wang MPIA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Lovely edits Michelle. With that track, you could also add the Access tag of "Private". That stops Bing Map users driving up the driveway because their car told them to! Good Luck! commented 2025-12-01 08:56:36 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
 | 175196896 (Comments: 1) | Fergusolooney (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fergusolooney, I don't really understand this change in bus station name that you did. Can you please explain. It looks like an error to me, but maybe I miss something. Regards, MaliMrav commented 2025-12-01 08:52:38 UTC by MaliMrav ♦61 |
| 171374663 (Comments: 4) | Lumor2020 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Habe die Nummern in ref geschoben https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175346267 commented 2025-12-01 08:50:26 UTC by ayxis ♦60 |
| 171399637 (Comments: 13) | Lumor2020 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Habe die Nummern in ref geschoben https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175346267 commented 2025-12-01 08:50:19 UTC by ayxis ♦60 |
| 175305414 (Comments: 1) | Shrokops (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tag Coût=15000? What type of business is this node? commented 2025-12-01 08:50:17 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175346267 (Comments: 1) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 41) | siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bezirksteile-in-munchen-mit-name/138394 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171399637 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171374663 commented 2025-12-01 08:49:50 UTC by ayxis ♦60 |
 | 174066113 (Comments: 1) | Finnbarr (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hei, kokonaisten asuinalueiden merkitseminen puutarhaksi on poikkeuksellista, näitä on nyt Suomessa lähinnä tässä muokkaamassasi Laajasalossa. Mielestäni garden:type=residential'eita kartoittaessa tulisi alueen... commented 2025-12-01 08:49:02 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦71 |
 | 175322357 (Comments: 1) | KarenReg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for editing in Lusaka/Zambia. While some of the roads you have re tagged as residential run through residential areas, such as Teagles Road, they are probably more accurately tagged as unclassified as they are more like 'connector... commented 2025-12-01 08:47:51 UTC by ftcat ♦210 |
| 175346408 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 404) | wrong comment: change zh-hant to name:zh-hant commented 2025-12-01 08:44:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175299149 (Comments: 1) | 漣澪靈 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please check my correction. Did you mean name:zh-hant instead of zh-hant? See https://www.osm.org/node/13295826048, https://www.osm.org/node/13295830435, https://www.osm.org/node/13295886221. commented 2025-12-01 08:42:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175346276 (Comments: 1) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 6) | *ERRATUM titre : Zone 30 commented 2025-12-01 08:41:38 UTC by Yasmina Bendik ♦3 |
| 175345911 (Comments: 1) | Jennifer Tsui (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jennifer - Thanks for mapping these. Where you have added an area for building, dam or similar, you don't need to add the name as "building". If the building had a name like "CBC House" then you would add it. Great mapping... commented 2025-12-01 08:40:24 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
 | 175161334 (Comments: 2) | Christian_Z (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich frag mich, ob das grad der Knoten der Fakultät werden soll, von denen es in Unitobler ja drei hat: https://osm.li/2ge commented 2025-12-01 08:39:21 UTC by habi ♦1,973 |
| 171667541 (Comments: 3) | EfreetSK (Discussed changesets: 6) | Pozrel som to a naozaj je tam priechod len pre peších. Asi sa mi z auta zdalo že za tým priechodom (to opotrebované) je priechod pre cyklistov, neviem. No každopádne zmenil som to na priechod pre peší... commented 2025-12-01 08:32:26 UTC by EfreetSK ♦11 |
| 175264972 (Comments: 2) | RIL91 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke für die Rückmeldung und Korrektur. commented 2025-12-01 08:29:37 UTC by RIL91 ♦5 |
| 174918739 (Comments: 3) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo Fabian007, vielen Dank für deinen Einsatz in StreetComplete und deine bisherigen Beiträge. Leider musste ein Großteil deiner Änderungen wieder rückgängig gemacht werden, weil es dabei zu einigen Missvers... commented 2025-12-01 08:21:21 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175082756 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 5) | Names like "Gussew" are actually regular and common transcriptions of current place names, not wrong names, and are also used as German Wikipedia article titles[1]. For old German-language names "old_name:de" tag was already used.... commented 2025-12-01 08:20:36 UTC by Pikse ♦212 |
| 175345230 (Comments: 1) | Michelle Wang MPIA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Just another heads up is that you can do more than one building per edit but don't do too many at a time. With the shed, try clicking on it and pressing "R" to rotate the building outline to match. Excellent stuff. commented 2025-12-01 08:14:56 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175344910 (Comments: 1) | gersc2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-12-01 08:11:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175118018 (Comments: 1) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hola compañero mapeador, ¿vas a actualizar todas las carreteras sin etiquetas en una fecha posterior? commented 2025-12-01 08:09:13 UTC by Sandal man ♦397 |
| 175344710 (Comments: 1) | dezzalim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Deszzalim, nice mapping. There is another shed there. You can add more than one item per edit but a fantastic start on this project commented 2025-12-01 08:05:52 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
 | 175311513 (Comments: 1) | Kejen1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Several duplicated highways removed commented 2025-12-01 08:01:04 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,998 |
| 175344614 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-12-01 08:00:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 173228047 (Comments: 2) | FVanh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Guten Morgen, Ich arbeite mit das Bauamt. Wir machen Strassenzustanderfassung: - Die Straße kann von kommunalen Fahrzeugen befahren werden. - Wir brauchen diese Strassentyp um die Zustanderfassung zu machen. commented 2025-12-01 07:57:27 UTC by FVanh ♦2 |
 | 151533464 (Comments: 3) | aleixstw (Discussed changesets: 13) | btw noticed another thingy - that most of those buildings and roads there are very skewed in terms of imagery, you have to use offset around 6.13, 4.46 to make it look correct there. but then basically all the town is incorrect, which is more or les... commented 2025-12-01 07:55:21 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦356 |
| 175344205 (Comments: 1) | grindvis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi.. Tip.. format phone is +31 in osm voor Nederland. Mvg eggie commented 2025-12-01 07:54:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175240979 (Comments: 2) | k2101 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Cześć, tak, jeśli nie jest to skomplikowana operacja, to usuwam niepoprawnie wrysowany landuse i z kolejnymi edycjami dodaję nowy. commented 2025-12-01 07:52:11 UTC by k2101 ♦11 |
 | 174636189 (Comments: 4) | wavewings (Discussed changesets: 4) | I was able to confirm the name so I've now added it back https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175344158 commented 2025-12-01 07:37:10 UTC by wavewings ♦5 |
| 175340347 (Comments: 1) | companyclean (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-01 07:34:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 174190025 (Comments: 3) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 13) | Je te confirme qu'on a bien un chemin point noeud entre 1 et 93 qui passe par la passerelle ;) commented 2025-12-01 07:31:03 UTC by BardafFr ♦14 |
| 175343747 (Comments: 1) | gersc2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-12-01 07:30:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| X | 175340768 (Comments: 1) | Steve Pizzati (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gday Steve, I hope you are good. When doing edits, try and just edit in a single country, preferably state or local area. It makes it easier for local validators to review changesets. Keep on keeping the rubber side down. Ewen commented 2025-12-01 07:29:51 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175341939 (Comments: 1) | seherna83wvm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-01 07:26:53 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 174857277 (Comments: 2) | Samuel Jacob Schweizer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Fjellrev Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung und die Erklärung. Ich verstehe nun den Punkt – wenn ein Weg physisch existiert, soll er auch in OpenStreetMap bleiben, selbst wenn er offiziell nicht gewünscht ist... commented 2025-12-01 07:25:58 UTC by Samuel Jacob Schweizer ♦1 |
| 175343720 (Comments: 1) | Dantine (Discussed changesets: 5) | Need to also consider upping the road classification of Helensvale Road from tertiary to secondary/primary given it's greater importance. Council classifies it as 'sub-arterial' in their road hierarchy. commented 2025-12-01 07:23:40 UTC by Dantine ♦7 |
| 175343258 (Comments: 1) | Bill Marshalls (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5589600698 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-01 07:20:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 155013706 (Comments: 2) | FelixBrinckmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, that would do it. Thanks for asking! commented 2025-12-01 07:08:18 UTC by FelixBrinckmann ♦1 |
| 174149989 (Comments: 1) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola, he visto que has estado haciendo bastantes ediciones por la zona de Paterna y como usuario nuevo has cometido algunos errores que quería comentarte. Primero en los conjuntos de cambios se debe describir un resumen de los cambios r... commented 2025-12-01 07:06:02 UTC by kapazao ♦945 |
| 175093713 (Comments: 3) | SurlyRider (Discussed changesets: 6) | bei der WvS-Straße sind die Fahrtrichtungen jeweils als Einbahnstraße erfasst. diese Einbahnstraßen sind für den Radverkehr in Gegenrichtung freigegeben gewesen. Das ist nicht korrekt. Auf der Fahrbahn darf ich mit dem Rad nich... commented 2025-12-01 07:03:47 UTC by SurlyRider ♦10 |
| 170861050 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 242) | 您好，桥梁名称请在相应name, name:en等字段前增加bridge:前缀，请勿在name, name:en等字段填写除了铁路线名以外的名称 commented 2025-12-01 07:02:26 UTC by DDD丶Samuel ♦14 |
| 151107942 (Comments: 2) | jbcharron (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bonjour, Toutes les bornes ajoutées ont été vérifiées sur le terrain, mais en effet ce sont des bornes de la voie de la liberté, n'ayant pas l'habitude j'avais pris une borne similaire qui e... commented 2025-12-01 06:49:15 UTC by jbcharron ♦142 |
| 175336524 (Comments: 3) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks! Sorry I started making some changes but then noticed you got some so I abandoned my edits so we don't collide. Thanks again for taking care of it all! commented 2025-12-01 06:47:31 UTC by gpserror ♦227 |
| 155589306 (Comments: 2) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 13) | Oui c'est ce que je ait maintenant mais cette modification est ancienne je n'était pas encore parfais :P commented 2025-12-01 06:37:39 UTC by BardafFr ♦14 |
| 160333411 (Comments: 2) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 242) | smoothie or "health" breakfast commented 2025-12-01 06:20:32 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
 | 175339913 (Comments: 1) | 한국지역난방공사 총무부 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175341714 commented 2025-12-01 06:02:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175339930 (Comments: 2) | 한국지역난방공사 총무부 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175341714 commented 2025-12-01 06:02:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 161303727 (Comments: 1) | user_8y978a (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ciao user_8y978a, quale è fonte di questo nome? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213010049 Questo è "semplice" parco pubblico senza nome, che io sappia. Nessuno parco per cani. https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fm;s2... commented 2025-12-01 05:59:37 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦324 |
| 167823842 (Comments: 2) | Blaues Licht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da hast du Recht. Das habe ich bei dem Anpassungen nach der Baustelle übersehen. Ich habe es korrigiert. commented 2025-12-01 05:53:58 UTC by Blaues Licht ♦1 |
| 167958442 (Comments: 3) | Sigo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre rapide retour et vos actions :) commented 2025-12-01 05:50:06 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
| X | 175320102 (Comments: 2) | Serpico (Discussed changesets: 9) | effectivement, merci d'avoir attiré mon attention ,en particulier sur la taille, j'y serais attentif lors de mes futures contributions commented 2025-12-01 05:37:03 UTC by Serpico ♦5 |
| 175314461 (Comments: 2) | Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (Discussed changesets: 4) | Our wiki has more info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon commented 2025-12-01 05:03:34 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 175337438 (Comments: 1) | pussreboots (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Hi pussreboots, thank you very much for your contribution! Just a heads up, when working with buildings and other often square-like objects, please square the objects. You can use "Q" on your keyboard (or right click ->... commented 2025-12-01 04:51:36 UTC by maxwellward ♦5 |
| 175337909 (Comments: 1) | 한국지역난방공사 총무부 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175339222 commented 2025-12-01 03:40:54 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 162612850 (Comments: 1) | C3322 (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - mapping military facilities in a war zone https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175338654 commented 2025-12-01 03:05:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 54666658 (Comments: 1) | they (Discussed changesets: 14) | I disagree with making all the roads and paths private chiefly for two reasons. 1) paths are rendered a grey and make it hard for the people on the fort to see them on OSM-carto style. 2) Strava and maybe some other apps will not permit routing on pr... commented 2025-12-01 03:01:22 UTC by Zandu ♦128 |
| 175148691 (Comments: 2) | 2007Lucas (Discussed changesets: 5) | 另外仁愛醫院也降編為臺北市聯合醫院仁愛院區了，所以名稱會是仁愛院區，非仁愛醫院 commented 2025-12-01 03:00:26 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 175116105 (Comments: 1) | MFlamm (Discussed changesets: 14) | FYI the tag cycleway=opposite is not recommended https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite commented 2025-12-01 02:46:12 UTC by kabelhaai ♦66 |
| 175294276 (Comments: 1) | Kirchturmfalke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Umlegung der Relationen. Vom Bussteig 4 fährt auch die 430. Vom Bussteig 3 die 405 und 409. Siehe meine Aufzeichnung auf Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1324382132773618 commented 2025-12-01 02:44:36 UTC by Oderradler ♦3 |
| 173076679 (Comments: 1) | DaAlx (Discussed changesets: 2) | FYI the tag cycleway=opposite is not recommended see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite commented 2025-12-01 02:44:22 UTC by kabelhaai ♦66 |
| 170901573 (Comments: 1) | MarkusHD (Discussed changesets: 32) | FYI cycleway=opposite has been deprecated in favour of oneway:bicycle, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway=opposite?uselang=en commented 2025-12-01 02:40:07 UTC by kabelhaai ♦66 |
| 175337722 (Comments: 1) | jhawken (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Please do not type addresses directly on shops, that causes unwanted duplicates (especially here because what you typed mismatched the official spelling). We fixed your edit. commented 2025-12-01 02:36:34 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,654 |
| 175309780 (Comments: 1) | Arjen Mentens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ter info: indien een POI zich al in een gebouw bevindt waarin al een adres op staat, dan moet je dit adres niet herhalen op de POI zelf. Dit wordt namelijk al automatisch gevonden. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175325836 commented 2025-12-01 02:14:10 UTC by kabelhaai ♦66 |
| 175336746 (Comments: 1) | RoseBTCmap (Discussed changesets: 1) | this is either completely wrong or its position is very incorrect as the Outback Steakhouse that this was placed inside of seemingly still exists based on its website and I have seen it open somewhat recently. https://locations.outback.com/florida... commented 2025-12-01 02:13:33 UTC by Udarian ♦536 |
| 175335851 (Comments: 2) | NoneyaBidness (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, the trail exists but the name and route/direction were completely wrong. I am the Trailforks Administrator for Oleta, OpenStreetMaps has most of these trails completely wrong and I am trying to update them. https://www.trailforks.com/regi... commented 2025-12-01 02:07:14 UTC by NoneyaBidness ♦2 |
| 118387937 (Comments: 2) | h551w (Discussed changesets: 64) | I seem to recall that I was slightly unsure about the tagging on that one. From what I can tell it's a warehouse where pipes (etc.) can be purchased, but it seems their customers are likely other businesses, rather than individuals commented 2025-12-01 01:36:45 UTC by h551w ♦66 |
 | 175056077 (Comments: 9) | RLakhani (Discussed changesets: 29) | Also look on the Indian side of the border - there isnt a road up to the border anymore. Their road ends at what looks like a military base/border post. Seen most clearly on "Mapbox Satellite" commented 2025-12-01 01:07:19 UTC by RLakhani ♦7 |
| 175335797 (Comments: 2) | NoneyaBidness (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is intentional, these trails have been completely destroyed by the park. New trails are being built but are nowhere near complete and will not follow any of the old paths. Please remove these so they no longer show on any maps and so when the ne... commented 2025-12-01 00:18:16 UTC by NoneyaBidness ♦2 |
| 175266322 (Comments: 1) | Arnau Mora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gràcies per colaborar en OSM. Les senyals de trànsit s'han de posar a l'altura d'on estan. En aquest cas, davant dels dos passos de vianants. Salutacions, Pau. commented 2025-12-01 00:03:52 UTC by paunofu ♦101 |
| 175325643 (Comments: 4) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 169) | To nie revertuj jeśli nie umiesz. Możesz dać znać na forum żeby zrobili to za ciebie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback commented 2025-11-30 23:59:24 UTC by Yunkers ♦401 |
| 175084685 (Comments: 3) | xdrewfacex (Discussed changesets: 1) | if this is actively under construction, you could also add `landuse=construction` to this area. I can take a guess at the outlines, but best if you add it assuming you've seen it in person commented 2025-11-30 23:52:38 UTC by John Kastner ♦51 |
 | 153432807 (Comments: 1) | ivias (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, to avoid accidentally sharing drain nodes with building, landuse or streets, you can hide objects other than drains in the ID editor. commented 2025-11-30 23:34:35 UTC by CharliePlett ♦25 |
| 175169675 (Comments: 3) | d3mol3k (Discussed changesets: 108) | Dzięki - za uwagi - source:maxspeed poprawiony; dzięki za operator:wikidata postaram się pouzupełniać commented 2025-11-30 23:26:49 UTC by d3mol3k ♦180 |
| 174956669 (Comments: 1) | NewSchool19 (Discussed changesets: 10) | It looks like there are two separate features that are both tagged `name=Pocahontas Elementary School`, but there should only be one. A useful read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element One way to fix this is to dra... commented 2025-11-30 23:26:29 UTC by Hayleox ♦14 |
| 175331264 (Comments: 2) | qugeb (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi qugeb, mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in Obertheres zwar Gebäude erfasst hast, aber die alten Grünflächen nicht angepasst hast. siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.017501/10.442489 In so einem Fall wä... commented 2025-11-30 23:26:21 UTC by redd ♦448 |
| 175124072 (Comments: 1) | NewSchool19 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Heads up: it looks like the running track here is actually 3 running tracks. The tags should only go on the relation, and the inner and outer ways should have no tags. commented 2025-11-30 23:21:39 UTC by Hayleox ♦14 |
| 175319430 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Were you really there? Why did you mark garages here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263521898/history/2) as being entirely underground? This is not the case. They are physically *under* the small footway, but they aren’t bu... commented 2025-11-30 23:20:07 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,654 |
| 175126419 (Comments: 3) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 65) | https://www.facebook.com/groups/1530442777794293/permalink/2074471003391465/ xD commented 2025-11-30 23:16:17 UTC by Yog Sot ♦361 |
| 127345993 (Comments: 1) | MegaStar112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi MegaStar112, beim Schützenhaus ist leider das building=yes verlorgen gegangen. Das habe ich nun wieder ergänzt. Grüße redd commented 2025-11-30 23:16:09 UTC by redd ♦448 |
| 170083166 (Comments: 2) | Mmkay634 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok thanks for the heads up. Maybe it’s the browser I’m on, but how do I look up which one it is? commented 2025-11-30 23:11:35 UTC by Mmkay634 ♦1 |
 | 175331101 (Comments: 1) | rarad74 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Thanks a lot for the lot of corrections and additions. The separation here and all around the area (you talked me in p.m.) I made is estabilished. I was there, and there are streetview photos from august 2025, forexample: https://www.mapi... commented 2025-11-30 23:10:14 UTC by grozsa11 ♦39 |
| 175134628 (Comments: 1) | Rockedf (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi there, it looks like Forest Friday Cheers is an event that takes place at Apocalypse Ale Works, not a permanent physical space. You can add the bitcoin related tags to the main Apocalypse Ale Works if you would like as well as adding information a... commented 2025-11-30 23:05:27 UTC by OptikalCrow ♦44 |
| 174343697 (Comments: 2) | mactavishfr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes sorry, I used google maps only for open hours, but I am indeed very familiar with this place and mostly used local knowledge. Thanks for the warning commented 2025-11-30 23:01:03 UTC by mactavishfr ♦2 |
| 175224739 (Comments: 1) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello Nar_arch, it seems that the metric you are using for a "too short highway" uses wrong assumptions. It is a long established OSM practice to connect ways to the areas which they are crossing. It is also common practice to not "... commented 2025-11-30 22:59:39 UTC by redd ♦448 |
| 175330299 (Comments: 1) | rarad74 (Discussed changesets: 36) | There are concrete wall separated lines from 2025 aug about. Would you undo the unseparation, please. osm.org/edit#map=19/45.000169/24.596842 See on latest streetview photos: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.999749916520614... commented 2025-11-30 22:56:29 UTC by grozsa11 ♦39 |
| 169604722 (Comments: 1) | Eggyn0mus (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zdravim, preco na zastavke D pisete, ze nema pristresok ani lavicku? V minulosti mala pristresok juzne od trafiky Tabak Press. Zmenilo sa tu nieco? commented 2025-11-30 22:52:34 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 175334291 (Comments: 1) | sarnek (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-11-30 22:51:44 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 169604489 (Comments: 1) | Eggyn0mus (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zdravim, "pismenkova variacia" bola spravne zapisana v znacke local_ref. Nema sa zapisovat do znacky 'name'. commented 2025-11-30 22:51:29 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 175245949 (Comments: 4) | Henri97 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo Henri, ich weiß nicht mehr auf welcher Wikiseite ich das gelesen hatte. Vermutlich war es eine, die nur Fußwege behandelt hat. Aber ich sehe es jetzt ein: Die Eigenschaft darf natürlich jeder Weg tragen, der neben einer ... commented 2025-11-30 22:41:42 UTC by george1201 ♦246 |
 | 175334027 (Comments: 1) | RedGreenBlue09 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Source: https://kiengiang.gov.vn/trang/TinTuc/255/9042/Ho-so-Quy-hoach-su-dung-dat-den-nam-2030-va-Ke-hoach-su-dung-dat-nam-2022-cua-huyen-Go-Quao.html https://kiengiang.gov.vn/trang/TinTuc/255/13690/Ho-so-Quy-hoach-su-dung-dat-den-nam-2030-va-... commented 2025-11-30 22:39:52 UTC by RedGreenBlue09 ♦47 |
| 175326876 (Comments: 1) | ABausD (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin! Die Änderung hat eine Lücke in der Knotenpunkt-Route erzeugt. Habe die geschlossen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175333804 Bitte schau noch mal drüber. commented 2025-11-30 22:30:41 UTC by GerdP ♦2,793 |
| 174838619 (Comments: 2) | 1Mmarek (Discussed changesets: 13) | Oh, dobré poznámky! Neuvedomila som si, že som pokazila relácie, musím sa s nimi naučiť robiť. Ďakujem aj za opravy!! :D commented 2025-11-30 22:29:18 UTC by 1Mmarek ♦9 |
| 174514018 (Comments: 1) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 63) | Zdravim, pride mi divne, ze v JOSM sa Vam podarilo tak poskodit relacie MHD: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=18.11888&lat=48.30866&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv... commented 2025-11-30 22:11:40 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 145709418 (Comments: 2) | René Altena (Discussed changesets: 4) | The numerical value seems pretty clear to me. The power per socket is 135 kW. (And not 120 as somebody wrote earlier) commented 2025-11-30 22:11:10 UTC by René Altena ♦3 |
| 175291459 (Comments: 1) | LandShrk1348 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, The following areas which you tagged with leisure=horse_riding (equestrian center) don't look like equestrian centers: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451478266 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454751182 https://www.openstre... commented 2025-11-30 22:09:54 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦850 |
| 126282269 (Comments: 1) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 104) | Hi, this is mapped as a relation and the name is only added to the relation...not the outer ways. commented 2025-11-30 22:09:27 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 175326144 (Comments: 1) | Mappigator (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Mappigator, Het is een losliggend pad. Dus dit kan prima. Ik heb wel het pad losgemaakt van de landuse=grass Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175326144 Linker alttoets gebruiken tijdens intekenen voorkomt plakke... commented 2025-11-30 22:05:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 163547169 (Comments: 8) | Vucod import (Discussed changesets: 4) | Salut, merci pour cet import qui enrichi la base. Je viens de remarque qu'il y a depuis cet import plusieurs doublons (des caméras importées alors que d'autres avaient été renseignées au même endroit... commented 2025-11-30 22:05:27 UTC by unclamped9 ♦1 |
 | 175199986 (Comments: 3) | aakkkaa (Discussed changesets: 12) | я на истину не претендую, поэтому ошибки нет. по вики, браунфилд это как правило расчищенное после использования под какую то стройку. ту... commented 2025-11-30 22:03:30 UTC by 4004 ♦1,926 |
| 174528145 (Comments: 1) | _Mathieu_ (Discussed changesets: 63) | Bonjour, Je ne sais pas s'il y a un lien avec les modifications mais la ligne de bus 304 : Les Courtilles → Nanterre, Place de la Boule (8123065) est en défaut. GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector la montre en erreur (ligne en noir). Ci-desso... commented 2025-11-30 22:02:22 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 174943069 (Comments: 9) | déMobiliste (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrigé ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175327437#map=19/47.748034/-3.387195 commented 2025-11-30 22:01:52 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 175325517 (Comments: 1) | Mappigator (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Mappiga, Je vraagt feedback. Wanneer het traject geschikt is voor bv landbouwvoertuigen dan is highway=track terecht. dan wel het tracktype=grade? toevoegen. Bij gras meestal 5 Wanneer het smal is dan highway=path gebruiken. Ik heb d... commented 2025-11-30 22:01:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175214545 (Comments: 1) | rafko2004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not map for the renderer (Farming Simulator 22). Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175333094 commented 2025-11-30 22:01:10 UTC by Piz Pachific ♦93 |
| 175327437 (Comments: 1) | déMobiliste (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je confirme, le problème est bien corrigé. commented 2025-11-30 22:01:02 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 175258409 (Comments: 2) | Autopistero20502020 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hola Autopistero20502020, los problemas de Wikimedia deben arreglarse en Wikimedia. Esto es OpenStreetMap y esta edición no es correcta porque con ella estás duplicando de forma indebida una relación que ya está en OpenStr... commented 2025-11-30 21:57:30 UTC by MarinoBM ♦113 |
| 175331827 (Comments: 5) | bleuthoot (Discussed changesets: 7) | .. en om je weer aan het twijfelen te brengen mbt straatnamen :) zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/straatnaam-en-wegnummer-op-rotonde/84339 commented 2025-11-30 21:51:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 169918506 (Comments: 1) | KekcuHa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Здравствуйте. А что это за странные линии без атрибутов добавлены? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419686254 commented 2025-11-30 21:50:50 UTC by solenoid jam ♦188 |
| 175268676 (Comments: 2) | masaka67 (Discussed changesets: 3) | nem volt szándékos, szerintem hiba volt, de most nem sikerült megismételni. figyelem majd commented 2025-11-30 21:47:37 UTC by masaka67 ♦2 |
 | 175332284 (Comments: 1) | Ivaylo Z (Discussed changesets: 1) | \tHello, thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks and happy mappi... commented 2025-11-30 21:42:47 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦37 |
| 175332068 (Comments: 1) | Marv8125 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks and happy mappi... commented 2025-11-30 21:38:08 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦37 |
| 175321976 (Comments: 1) | Jazz37 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello Jazz, Following on from yesterday's comment. Could you please take greater care when adding crossings. many of the crossings you've added a number of "Marked Crossings" that should be "Unmarked Crossings". marke... commented 2025-11-30 21:36:09 UTC by kitsee ♦115 |
| 175330044 (Comments: 1) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 105) | Widziałem go i zapomniałem zmienić 🙃 commented 2025-11-30 21:35:10 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦811 |
| 172414011 (Comments: 3) | DLRLA2025BI (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, in OpenStreetMap, we model long hiking and cycling routes as superroutes because maintaining huge route relations becomes a mess. These superroutes contain only nodes (signposts) and relations (regional sections of the superroute). This is... commented 2025-11-30 21:34:27 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,168 |
 | 175329110 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | No es una villa, pero el nombre es "Villa Los Nolitos". commented 2025-11-30 21:30:22 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175329130 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | No es una villa, pero el nombre es "Villa Hadita". commented 2025-11-30 21:30:08 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175329149 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | No es una villa, pero el nombre es "Villa San Felipe". commented 2025-11-30 21:29:55 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175329167 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | No es una villa, pero el nombre es "Villa San Jose". commented 2025-11-30 21:29:42 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175331604 (Comments: 1) | bleuthoot (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag bleutooth, Vaak is het beter om geen junction roundabout toe te voegen aan het fietsgedeelte. Soms is sprake van een tweerichtingrotonde. Wanneer je dan er een rotonde van maakt zijn de vele fietsrouterelaties stuk. Een deel op onew... commented 2025-11-30 21:27:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175327468 (Comments: 3) | Roy88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dankjewel, ook voor de welkommail met uitleg. commented 2025-11-30 21:26:40 UTC by Roy88 ♦1 |
| 175331598 (Comments: 1) | Szmeny (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być fo... commented 2025-11-30 21:22:24 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175314352 (Comments: 1) | Hutch Young (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please add also the key religion and denomination. commented 2025-11-30 21:13:43 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175314455 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | ok postaram się. Z rozpędu nie zwracałem na to uwagi commented 2025-11-30 21:08:11 UTC by WieKo68 ♦162 |
 | 158800023 (Comments: 2) | LucFreitas (Discussed changesets: 48) | Os limites foram desenhados de forma aproximada a partir de imagem publicada pela PMVV à época da implantação do MONA, conforme descrito na etiqueta fixme. Sinta-se à vontade para realizar as correções... commented 2025-11-30 21:07:32 UTC by LucFreitas ♦101 |
| 175318546 (Comments: 1) | DownBigBrother (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/8810193838 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. Because you didn't add one new information, i reverted your wohle change set. I moved the node back to ... commented 2025-11-30 21:07:06 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
 | 173674869 (Comments: 1) | NegroRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi GuainiaRiver, I don't thin you should add foot=no to intersections of small residential streets, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444259942. foot=no means an interdiction of pedestrians. But there's not actual marked... commented 2025-11-30 21:01:56 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175331137 (Comments: 1) | Slimol Vix (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-11-30 21:01:06 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175324215 (Comments: 1) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 115) | Moin, du hast hier das access entfernt - aber der note das es gesperrt ist ist auf der Brücke noch drauf. Was stimmt da jetzt? Flo commented 2025-11-30 21:00:23 UTC by flohoff ♦2,408 |
| 175328418 (Comments: 1) | user52781636 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the two nodea more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. Additional you add only a name node (nota address, no business description, no contact information). I have now reverted your changes. ... commented 2025-11-30 20:57:45 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175026181 (Comments: 1) | Kin Sapalot (Discussed changesets: 8) | Kan het zijn dat dit pad hetzelfde is als mijn track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/amrmap/traces/12122937 ? Mijn track loopt (in westelijke richting) nagenoeg gelijk vanaf het klinkerpad en ik herinner me niet een eerdere afslag. commented 2025-11-30 20:49:05 UTC by amrmap ♦1 |
| 175329781 (Comments: 1) | HTFF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/152408983 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-11-30 20:48:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175323397 (Comments: 1) | anctoster (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres strony internetowej zawiera powtórzone protokoły. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1... commented 2025-11-30 20:42:39 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175323384 (Comments: 1) | spam46200 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12105695732 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-11-30 20:42:33 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175323519 (Comments: 1) | anctoster (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13342943553 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-11-30 20:42:28 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 139522815 (Comments: 1) | Antoine chatelain (Discussed changesets: 24) | why did you change wikipedia link here from English to French? doesn't make sense to me... commented 2025-11-30 20:41:56 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦356 |
 | 173583310 (Comments: 12) | Victor Dps (Discussed changesets: 11) | Name changed back to United States --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173583310 commented 2025-11-30 20:38:06 UTC by Glassman ♦5,634 |
| 137359204 (Comments: 1) | ximonas (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, be careful, you marked a huge area as building (building=yes) when it's not - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800406932/history, will fix commented 2025-11-30 20:34:55 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦356 |
| 171857289 (Comments: 1) | CharliStarry (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Thank you for these improvements. However, Arecaceae is not a genus, it is a taxon . Regards, Marc commented 2025-11-30 20:34:47 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,313 |
 | 175161267 (Comments: 2) | SOldenburg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you. Will do. commented 2025-11-30 20:30:05 UTC by SOldenburg ♦2 |
| 103972298 (Comments: 1) | Mihai Mandea (Discussed changesets: 82) | Hotel Turist e abandonat de zeci de ani, acum am observat changeset-ul de acum 4 ani dupa ce am pus pinul de abandoned:tourism O sa ii fac revert, just fyi commented 2025-11-30 20:18:24 UTC by ctrl-alt-k ♦10 |
| 174972437 (Comments: 1) | GeneHunt (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi - given that nothing has been touched on the ground, where did these alignments come from. If they are copied from the planning docs then we have a problem. commented 2025-11-30 20:11:31 UTC by mackerski ♦35 |
| 175311340 (Comments: 1) | Chrys000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Chrys000, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Vielen Dank für deine Aktualisierung! Ich habe mir deinen Änderungssatz angeschaut, weil du die entsprechende Option beim hochladen angegeben hast. Der Name war bereits an d... commented 2025-11-30 20:09:14 UTC by Robert46798 ♦193 |
 | 173872178 (Comments: 1) | JargeZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 20:02:56 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 174200535 (Comments: 1) | Jorgintro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 20:00:55 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
 | 174616965 (Comments: 1) | Serge Grusenmeyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:58:00 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 173904057 (Comments: 2) | Davide Pastelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am familiar with it, how can I edit the source? commented 2025-11-30 19:56:38 UTC by Davide Pastelli ♦1 |
| 174474050 (Comments: 1) | PsicólogoClademir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:55:14 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
 | 168624740 (Comments: 2) | Radiat47 (Discussed changesets: 4) | To be honest, it was a pleasure to explore it as this train stop is simply legendary :-D And while doing it, we met there an elderly railway worker using the path regularly to get home from his job. So it was a perfect Balcan story. Zdrav&iacu... commented 2025-11-30 19:54:52 UTC by Radiat47 ♦2 |
| 174184449 (Comments: 1) | Monoboy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:53:01 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
 | 173972770 (Comments: 1) | BambinaChinita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:50:55 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 173906556 (Comments: 1) | wqC-gmN5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:48:54 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 175278792 (Comments: 2) | kukułka (Discussed changesets: 23) | Tak, dzięki, za czujność, tam trzeba więcej poprawić np. strefa tempo 30, zacząłem to sprawdzać jeszcze, i zapisałem zmiany bez zmiany highway. To dodałem commented 2025-11-30 19:45:47 UTC by kukułka ♦43 |
| 174271995 (Comments: 1) | Yashwant Classes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:42:04 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 139334281 (Comments: 4) | the_third_man (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi habi, I don't see that happening, as the generator is permanently installed in the building. I would agree with you if it were a mobile generator. commented 2025-11-30 19:39:30 UTC by the_third_man ♦2 |
| 173819219 (Comments: 1) | Taya Fields (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:37:08 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 174534870 (Comments: 1) | ulliwww (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:34:35 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 151819357 (Comments: 1) | Dilcharan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11933337052/history has shop = bike_parts that was added in this edit shop=bike_parts ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=m... commented 2025-11-30 19:32:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 174400582 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 117) | Hello, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the proje... commented 2025-11-30 19:32:05 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 157490110 (Comments: 1) | TheLNL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12224096346/history has shop = bike_parts that was added in this edit shop=bike_parts ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=m... commented 2025-11-30 19:31:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175327995 (Comments: 1) | ftrebien (Discussed changesets: 40) | E também 2020-04-19 commented 2025-11-30 19:30:46 UTC by ftrebien ♦175 |
| 174187532 (Comments: 1) | Linie29 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447364391/history has building = serviceq that was added in this edit building=serviceq ? Maybe intention was to use building=service and then square area? commented 2025-11-30 19:29:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 170808600 (Comments: 1) | EPMPaul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424037074/history has building = serviceq that was added in this edit building=serviceq ? Maybe intention was to use building=service and then square area? commented 2025-11-30 19:29:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 173982537 (Comments: 2) | GamenHaaDee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!, On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cau... commented 2025-11-30 19:28:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 145153092 (Comments: 1) | atlas-3d (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197868776/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign ... commented 2025-11-30 19:26:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 135116333 (Comments: 1) | Luis Garcia-Lopez (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764262237/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign ... commented 2025-11-30 19:26:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 157775853 (Comments: 1) | josmougn (Discussed changesets: 75) | Bonjour, Concernant le node/12242099726, il ne s'agirait pas plutôt d'un amenity=letter_box ? commented 2025-11-30 19:16:49 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
| 175327367 (Comments: 1) | Ltrlg (Discussed changesets: 50) | comment ~= entre Valmy et Verdun commented 2025-11-30 19:15:02 UTC by Ltrlg ♦94 |
| 109954515 (Comments: 1) | Marcussacapuces91 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, Concernant le node/9021216633, je pense qu'il s'agit plutôt de amenity=letter_box avec post_box:type=community (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box) N'étant pas sur place, je ne p... commented 2025-11-30 19:13:31 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
| 174686261 (Comments: 4) | Nicolasb91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | J'ai restauré le tracé surfacique de l'Yvette commented 2025-11-30 19:09:15 UTC by esmenard ♦12 |
| 175301160 (Comments: 1) | Ryang_alt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please check https://osm.org/note/5074182 commented 2025-11-30 19:07:44 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦368 |
| 122258782 (Comments: 2) | Ryang_alt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sorry, wrong changeset. Only the node were moved. commented 2025-11-30 19:05:41 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦368 |
 | 146147829 (Comments: 1) | Shamsudin Ahmed (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yes social library in the wolaita sodo university commented 2025-11-30 18:56:48 UTC by Shamsudin Ahmed ♦4 |
| 174534958 (Comments: 1) | Wobu60 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci d'avoir corrigé le champ operator. J'ai vérifié sur NSI et tu as raison sur l'utilisation des minuscules. J'ai repris les 1500 PAV que j'avais cartographié depuis 8 mois pour ... commented 2025-11-30 18:56:40 UTC by oldnab ♦3 |
| 146110444 (Comments: 1) | Shamsudin Ahmed (Discussed changesets: 4) | Specific building commented 2025-11-30 18:50:46 UTC by Shamsudin Ahmed ♦4 |
| 170569625 (Comments: 7) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 64) | Interesting. In the US we don't really have anything like European "node networks". And it's pretty common for named routes to be incomplete and therefore discontinuous. What is the issue you are trying to address here? The curren... commented 2025-11-30 18:50:15 UTC by quincylvania ♦69 |
| 175150590 (Comments: 1) | Mabula Jovin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Why do you remove residential area? It is still visable on the satellite image --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175150590 commented 2025-11-30 18:48:49 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 145514906 (Comments: 1) | Shamsudin Ahmed (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wolaita solo university south Ethiopia located commented 2025-11-30 18:46:58 UTC by Shamsudin Ahmed ♦4 |
| 161190669 (Comments: 2) | Emdier (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your advice. commented 2025-11-30 18:45:20 UTC by Emdier ♦6 |
| 175326114 (Comments: 1) | Pullaski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: Addition of sidewalk along western side of Falls Road. commented 2025-11-30 18:40:54 UTC by Pullaski ♦1 |
| 171575789 (Comments: 3) | steuermann (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke, ich hatte mittlerweile gesehen, dass 250er (Durchfahrt verboten) Schilder verwendet wurden und daher auf vehicle=agricultural + bicycle=yes geändert. Gruß Langläufer commented 2025-11-30 18:30:40 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,440 |
| 175318935 (Comments: 1) | Seppiedupi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for spotting that a new business is operating here. You may have noticed that there was already a vacant place here. It is always better to change the tags on existing businesses than to create a new o... commented 2025-11-30 18:23:55 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,654 |
| 174705528 (Comments: 1) | RunJennyRunUSA (Discussed changesets: 15) | Coolman Commons Condominiums is not the name of a road in Boston. Please avoid adding invented street names unless they’re supported by signage or official sources. For clarity, the buildings in that complex are numbered 239, 241, 245, and 251,... commented 2025-11-30 18:19:24 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦128 |
| 175289879 (Comments: 1) | Fred_Skipwith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175289879 commented 2025-11-30 18:16:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,634 |
| 175318693 (Comments: 2) | JG Mazury (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oczywiście masz rację - zastosuję się. commented 2025-11-30 18:14:45 UTC by JG Mazury ♦4 |
| 140505034 (Comments: 1) | simonc11 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used tunnel=culivert on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202879087/history Have you maybe meant tunnel=culvert ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2025-11-30 18:14:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175031014 (Comments: 3) | Nicolasb91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | J'ai annulé la modification https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175325181 commented 2025-11-30 18:12:37 UTC by esmenard ♦12 |
| 175166686 (Comments: 1) | mango20 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tässä changesetissä näyttää useat bussipysäkit teleportanneen miten sattuu tien toiselle puolelle, keskelle risteystä ymv. commented 2025-11-30 18:12:35 UTC by todeveni ♦14 |
| 159217987 (Comments: 1) | dalmond (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used tunnel=culverts on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213602723/history Have you maybe meant tunnel=culvert ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ob... commented 2025-11-30 18:09:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175324726 (Comments: 1) | ZB_BN (Discussed changesets: 26) | Moin, meinst du shop=pet_grooming ? Ein shop=hairdresser ist nur für Menschen gedacht. Viele Grüße commented 2025-11-30 18:07:45 UTC by limes11 ♦970 |
| 168565829 (Comments: 1) | öreg (Discussed changesets: 70) | Hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5074140 ? commented 2025-11-30 18:06:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 143614107 (Comments: 2) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 191) | Nie mam pojęcia, postaram się jutro poszukać jakichś informacji. Może coś znajdę commented 2025-11-30 18:05:23 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦811 |
| 171125116 (Comments: 1) | Antoine chatelain (Discussed changesets: 24) | Bonjour, Si le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1358306692 est disused:highway il reste inclus dans les relations des bus ce qui les met en erreur. Ci-dessous le lien GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector qui monte les lignes de bus en erreur (ligne... commented 2025-11-30 18:05:12 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 175276267 (Comments: 3) | Nordkappp (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je comprends ton soucis avec StreetComplete, sur la carte on voit bien qu"il y a deux abri, si quelqu'un fait des stats il trouvera un abri de trop. Je viens de voir qu'un autre contributeur a fait une modif avec la même info... commented 2025-11-30 17:58:57 UTC by lenny32 ♦65 |
| 175315919 (Comments: 2) | Krzych29 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dziękuję za informację. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-11-30 17:58:11 UTC by Krzych29 ♦1 |
| 175153735 (Comments: 2) | FlowerHillPerson (Discussed changesets: 34) | Thank you for telling me this. I was not aware of this, and appreciate you explaining it to me. My sincerest apologies. commented 2025-11-30 17:49:01 UTC by FlowerHillPerson ♦28 |
| 175262952 (Comments: 1) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 460) | Do wycofania https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=residential?uselang=pl Jak byk pisze "Drogi do pojedynczych zabudowań zazwyczaj oznacza się jako highway=service (i najprawdopodobniej również service=driveway).&quo... commented 2025-11-30 17:47:49 UTC by olo81 ♦693 |
| 173479129 (Comments: 1) | dwarfclimbs (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour ! Pour info, j'ai retiré le tag junction=roundabout sur le terre-plein du Rond-Point Rosa Parks car ce tag n'est destiné qu'à la portion de voirie elle même (highway=*). Bonnes contribut... commented 2025-11-30 17:47:04 UTC by cquest ♦278 |
| 175162909 (Comments: 2) | SOldenburg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the feedback. Much appreciated. Best, Sue commented 2025-11-30 17:45:52 UTC by SOldenburg ♦2 |
| 119064224 (Comments: 1) | SAAD EL HACHIMI (Discussed changesets: 3) | I surveyed the places myself now, but please don't copy paste from Google Maps. commented 2025-11-30 17:41:17 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 119029917 (Comments: 1) | SAAD EL HACHIMI (Discussed changesets: 3) | I surveyed the places myself now, but please don't copy paste from Google Maps. commented 2025-11-30 17:41:11 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 119062884 (Comments: 1) | SAAD EL HACHIMI (Discussed changesets: 3) | I surveyed the places myself now, but please don't copy paste from Google Maps. commented 2025-11-30 17:40:54 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175153823 (Comments: 1) | FlowerHillPerson (Discussed changesets: 34) | Please tag land cover (natural=wood) separately than park boundaries. The parks are not 100% covered with forest. commented 2025-11-30 17:39:50 UTC by akadouri ♦59 |
| 174519061 (Comments: 9) | Protoxenus (Discussed changesets: 130) | Wie bereits im Forum festgestellt 0 ist so oder so nicht der Defaultwert von level die Änderungen sind also so oder so falsch. commented 2025-11-30 17:39:48 UTC by SimonPoole ♦351 |
| 175323316 (Comments: 1) | Marv8125 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Marv8125, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 10 natural(s) Could you please confirm if the... commented 2025-11-30 17:26:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175305675 (Comments: 1) | Max Smits (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, I saw you made many edits in Sofia with changeset comment ST1, ST5 and ST7. What does ST stand for? What did you do? commented 2025-11-30 17:23:35 UTC by rhhs ♦155 |
| 138575217 (Comments: 1) | Michał-80 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189967487/history has building = 12 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-11-30 17:13:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 168349958 (Comments: 1) | FriedhelmLG (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001211101/history has building = 12 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-11-30 17:13:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 163774915 (Comments: 1) | Aye Aye Nyein (Discussed changesets: 14) | hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5074070 ? commented 2025-11-30 17:12:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175292698 (Comments: 2) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 134) | Nie miałem wyboru :p commented 2025-11-30 17:09:54 UTC by Anas masuris ♦148 |
| 174453324 (Comments: 1) | Patchanka (Discussed changesets: 42) | l'œuvre existe mais est recouverte par une construction / étagère du bar Xurasko.. commented 2025-11-30 16:51:19 UTC by Donlooba411 ♦12 |
| 172263252 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 144) | Very nice catch on the incorrectly named street! BTW: Is adding the postal code, town, and / or province to buildings really worth it? This can be found very easily with a spatial search ("building addr:housenumber=... addr:street=... IN ... commented 2025-11-30 16:31:08 UTC by aseigo ♦4 |
| 175195537 (Comments: 10) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 126) | 2. As I said, whether this has been an estate would be covered by `abandoned:landuse=residential` commented 2025-11-30 16:18:47 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175264666 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 72) | That has the entire road blocked, and physically. You said there are sidewalks available here. commented 2025-11-30 16:10:02 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 174280819 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM4 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Тут вышел небольшой промах со зданием для адреса. Адрес был добавлен строящемуся корпусу, адрес которому ещё не присвоен. Фактически... commented 2025-11-30 16:07:32 UTC by fndoder ♦103 |
 | 173369748 (Comments: 1) | Zhakupova Tomiris (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, this changeset did not make OpenStreetMap better. Please if you are not sure of what you are doing do not upload your changes to OpenStreetMap. Here is what OpenStreetMap is about https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/ commented 2025-11-30 15:54:17 UTC by Enock4seth ♦587 |
| 175319573 (Comments: 1) | Psztomol (Discussed changesets: 82) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - zastosuj się, proszę. commented 2025-11-30 15:51:24 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
 | 175274468 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 278) | Revertoval jsem tuto změnu, neboť jsou adresy správně. Pokud si myslíte opak, prosím napište na mailing list: https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/202511 Nebo do kanálu na Matrixu: https://openstreetmap.cz/matrix commented 2025-11-30 15:41:00 UTC by Dvorný ♦12 |
| 175210151 (Comments: 2) | bjanevic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. I was out biking and was surprised to see it was open already. It still needs a lot of updates because I didn't stop to look at anything. commented 2025-11-30 15:38:08 UTC by bjanevic ♦1 |
| 175316610 (Comments: 1) | Mohamed_Taha (Discussed changesets: 8) | I don't think "Naftal" is the name in Berber. commented 2025-11-30 15:34:05 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 174856285 (Comments: 3) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 366) | Bedankt! commented 2025-11-30 15:31:28 UTC by lyctkel ♦348 |
| 173010355 (Comments: 1) | Iván Caparrós (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please, PLEASE, remove the building=yes tag when you make such changes. It's like a huge building now. commented 2025-11-30 15:27:19 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175318161 (Comments: 1) | GasaiYuno (Discussed changesets: 62) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-11-30 15:22:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175317251 (Comments: 1) | ikkefc3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Feedback Bij één verbidning lagen de nodes los op elkaar. Dat heb ik hersteld. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175317251 Ik zal je onze welkomstmail sturen per PB , want die heb je nooit ontvangen zie ik. MVG,... commented 2025-11-30 15:21:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175252066 (Comments: 2) | Dominik A (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, vielen Dank für den Hinweis und die Kontrolle der Änderungen! Viele Grüße commented 2025-11-30 15:14:48 UTC by Dominik A ♦1 |
| 175193851 (Comments: 1) | Mabula Jovin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Why do you remove residential area? It is still there --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175193851 commented 2025-11-30 15:12:26 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 175209116 (Comments: 4) | didier2020 (Discussed changesets: 61) | Merci! Je pense avoir compris comment j'ai fais ces erreurs, Bon dimanche! commented 2025-11-30 15:08:58 UTC by Guylby ♦1 |
| 175201502 (Comments: 1) | LIFERLIGHDOW (Discussed changesets: 1) | 重覆添加了，已經有了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263141596 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175201502 commented 2025-11-30 15:07:41 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 172006056 (Comments: 1) | GasaiYuno (Discussed changesets: 62) | hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5073913 ? commented 2025-11-30 15:04:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175237244 (Comments: 2) | Beinardus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the review. I took it from the ticket because I could not find the name of the road in OSM. I will keep it in mind. commented 2025-11-30 14:54:16 UTC by Beinardus ♦4 |
| 175228747 (Comments: 1) | Aikiriza Justus (Discussed changesets: 3) | the "buildings" you draw are only tombs inside the cememtery, no need to tracing --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175228747 commented 2025-11-30 14:50:33 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 171069738 (Comments: 1) | Brummelwuff (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hallo Brummelwuff In diesem Changeset hast du mindestens eine Leitplanke zugefügt. Da ist darauf zu achten, dass die rechte Seite der Linie die straßenzugewandte Seite ist. Liebe Grüße und danke für deine vielen guten... commented 2025-11-30 14:44:04 UTC by nurdafur ♦235 |
| X | 175211651 (Comments: 2) | rominail (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'll try to see if I can do it, as I made the modifications with the andoid app "street-complete" commented 2025-11-30 14:41:56 UTC by rominail ♦1 |
| 175234885 (Comments: 1) | oypr (Discussed changesets: 1) | 重覆添加了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172618645 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175234885 commented 2025-11-30 14:37:09 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 175300008 (Comments: 2) | Yosua Rama Mada Krisna Purnama (Discussed changesets: 1) | Halo, bangungan-bangunan yang terpetakan sebelumnya itu sudah bagus. Yang kamu perlukan hanya melanjutkan yang belum terpetakan, bukan menghapusnya. Cara memetakan bangunan bukan hanya melihat plek-ketiplek bagaimana bentuk atap dari citra satelit, n... commented 2025-11-30 14:35:09 UTC by FajrAl ♦113 |
| 174005183 (Comments: 1) | ash_sh15 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, this way was already correctly tagged as a footpath. Could you elaborate on why it was re-tagged as a service road? I'm not clear what ground truth was used here, since there is no public imagery or news to the contrary commented 2025-11-30 14:32:01 UTC by uknown-gryphus ♦39 |
| 175270782 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 35) | reverted, missing waiver (it expired) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175315739 commented 2025-11-30 14:29:43 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦138 |
| 175312996 (Comments: 3) | ikkefc3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dat laatste lijkt me een strak plan ! Mapse commented 2025-11-30 14:23:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175291735 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 35) | reverted, missing waiver (it expired) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175315417 commented 2025-11-30 14:22:59 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦138 |
| 175306473 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 35) | reverted, missing waiver (it expired) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175315391 commented 2025-11-30 14:22:18 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦138 |
| 171133118 (Comments: 1) | TymZ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Woran sieht man vor Ort noch, dass dort mal eine Straßenbahn gefahren ist? Ansonsten bitte in OSM löschen und ggf. auf Openhinstoricalmap eintragen. commented 2025-11-30 14:21:25 UTC by Nielkrokodil ♦109 |
| 175268631 (Comments: 1) | TimRa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo TimRa, ich habe Deine Löschungen rückgängig gemacht, denn diese Grundstückszufahrten waren alle mit access=private gekennzeichnet. Es ist bei OSM üblich, solche Zuwegungen zu erfassen. Solche Daten sind z.B. f&uu... commented 2025-11-30 14:16:30 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,377 |
| 171132471 (Comments: 1) | TymZ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, vor Ort sieht man nichts mehr von der Linie 59. So etwas gehört nicht in OSM, weil wir nur die Gegenwart eintragen. Ich habe das Stück Endstelle Linie 59 daher gelöscht. Schau mal auf https://www.openhistoricalmap... commented 2025-11-30 14:15:48 UTC by Nielkrokodil ♦109 |
 | 175312288 (Comments: 1) | unbrokensmile84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej En kommentar gällande busshållplatser, inom hela SLs område så är de taggade enligt den förenklade modellen. Tyvärr så kommer iD-redigeraren med felaktiga rekommendation gällande dem, bara i... commented 2025-11-30 14:14:43 UTC by Snusmumriken ♦152 |
| 175258061 (Comments: 3) | user260 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it. Thanks for flagging that. Edwin commented 2025-11-30 14:09:42 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
 | 175291494 (Comments: 4) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | I think the problem was due to the size of the dataset, which ended up reaching my limit and thus caused this problem. When I retry it, I'll do so in smaller batches. In any case, I have now reached out to the portuguese forum community to ask f... commented 2025-11-30 14:07:39 UTC by DFace Peter ♦3 |
| 175312155 (Comments: 1) | danieldevos (Discussed changesets: 2) | Daniel.. Tip.. Gebruik de adresnode. Dus niet zelf adressen toevoegen. Alle info staat op de adsresnode nu. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-30 14:07:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 102359192 (Comments: 1) | Johnwhelan (Discussed changesets: 36) | would you be fine with lamp_type=led tagging? see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/poll-led-vs-led/138681/ commented 2025-11-30 14:04:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175147602 (Comments: 5) | kiwilecker (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey Sven, ich habs jetzt einfach mal neu gemacht, quasi so wie vorher: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1483452 Jetzt sind zwar die einzelnen Abzweigstellen doppelt als landuse=railway getaggt, aber das entspricht ja irgendwie auch der Reali... commented 2025-11-30 14:02:22 UTC by kiwilecker ♦2 |
| 175311841 (Comments: 1) | danieldevos (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-30 14:01:20 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175155934 (Comments: 16) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 109) | And definitely thanks for surveying and updating map, that is more valuable than 10 000 retags! commented 2025-11-30 13:53:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175302665 (Comments: 1) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 19000 of your last 19000 changes were deletions. This is q... commented 2025-11-30 13:46:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 145056434 (Comments: 3) | knowname (Discussed changesets: 5) | And thanks for changing tagging! commented 2025-11-30 13:31:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 175310482 (Comments: 1) | conico52 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Por favor no pegar landuses a los caminos. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175310482 commented 2025-11-30 13:24:14 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,606 |
| 141122106 (Comments: 3) | David Trueman (Discussed changesets: 6) | Great! Thanks for a fix! commented 2025-11-30 13:21:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175138947 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 443) | Bonjour, Les noms dans OSM ne doivent pas être écrits en majuscule, pouvez-vous appliquer les règles présentes dans le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names ? Merci Jean-Baptiste commented 2025-11-30 13:19:41 UTC by jbcharron ♦142 |
 | 175264070 (Comments: 1) | pidugu konda reddy (Discussed changesets: 784) | Hello pidugu konda reddy, Thank you for your contribution to OSM, I noticed that you changed the classification of several existing streets to highway=construction in the following changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17526616... commented 2025-11-30 12:57:48 UTC by Eslam_Elsayed ♦22 |
| 175305537 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 54) | "Ładowarka Pantografowa Komunikacji Miejskiej" to nie nazwa własna - powinno to być w znaczniku "description", a nie "name". Popraw, proszę. commented 2025-11-30 12:32:39 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 170667311 (Comments: 5) | vmicho (Discussed changesets: 69) | And you are kindly ask to fix your nonsense. commented 2025-11-30 12:21:33 UTC by vmicho ♦83 |
| 175008631 (Comments: 3) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 43) | Nigdzie w rozkładzie takiej informacji nie ma commented 2025-11-30 12:06:13 UTC by zuicz ♦290 |
| 175294369 (Comments: 4) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 177) | ну вот а тег wheelchair=yes означает самостоятельную возможность передвигаться инвалиду. И ставить его тут не надо (как и на автобусы, где нужна... commented 2025-11-30 11:58:12 UTC by literan ♦6,885 |
| 175269972 (Comments: 2) | Emil1887 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Noch keine Fahrradstraße. Ich habe deinen Changeset rückgängig gemacht. commented 2025-11-30 11:53:15 UTC by eserte ♦160 |
| 175292702 (Comments: 1) | civ2mapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo. willkommen bei OSM. Danke das du uns hilft, die Karte zu verbessern. Bzgl. Rad- und Fußwege, schaue doch bitte mal hier: Wenn Radwege vorhanden sind, egal ob benutzungspflichtig beschildert oder einfach nur baulich oder gestal... commented 2025-11-30 11:51:31 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,440 |
| 175168873 (Comments: 4) | Joris_Guesné (Discussed changesets: 1) | attention cependant, il est devenu inutile de créer une relation "associatedstreet" commented 2025-11-30 11:51:00 UTC by Carto75 ♦19 |
| 170261075 (Comments: 2) | olane (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah! Thank you for the correction! commented 2025-11-30 11:45:44 UTC by olane ♦1 |
| 175197123 (Comments: 4) | zaizone (Discussed changesets: 24) | merci, j'ai ajouté quelques détails au passage en fonction de ces images commented 2025-11-30 11:37:07 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦119 |
| 175306773 (Comments: 2) | Flying Dutch (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ditch?? Dutch commented 2025-11-30 11:29:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 169721442 (Comments: 2) | stenick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, je crois que c'etait un post box sans code. commented 2025-11-30 11:22:41 UTC by stenick ♦1 |
| 175306972 (Comments: 1) | Flying Dutch (Discussed changesets: 4) | De lege node heb ik verwijderd. Een gebouwnaam kan uiteraard op de gebouw omtrek. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175306972 MVG eggie commented 2025-11-30 11:15:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175288419 (Comments: 1) | :-} (Discussed changesets: 187) | Ale te części "ronda" nie są częścią trasy DK7 -> Most Północny lub Most Północny -> DK7, więc nie powinno być primary. To nie jest klasyczne rondo, a zwykłe skrzyżowanie nazwane rondem. Podobny przypa... commented 2025-11-30 11:00:00 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦811 |
| 175305129 (Comments: 1) | Luxury Lifestyle Boutique (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Onlineshops worden eigenlijk niet opgenomen in OSM. Er 'moet' echt sprake zijn van een winkel met een bezoekadres. Dit lijkt me een woonhuis. Is dat het geval? Alleen een website doet verder ook niets in OS... commented 2025-11-30 10:59:10 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 173900481 (Comments: 1) | stirps_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, das mit dem Import war nicht so glücklich. Die solltest du alle nochmal kontrollieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13265671271 Hier steht definitiv KEIN Recycling Container Da wo du das hin gelegt hast ist e... commented 2025-11-30 10:45:20 UTC by flohoff ♦2,408 |
| 174376091 (Comments: 5) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 59) | Merci beaucoup Cordialement Michel commented 2025-11-30 10:24:44 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 173543042 (Comments: 1) | Léo_MdP (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Suite aux travaux Place du Colonnel la Ligne de Bus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52719993 Bus 75 : Porte de Pantin → Panthéon est défaut de continuité. GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector la donne en erreur (affich&e... commented 2025-11-30 10:16:20 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 175164645 (Comments: 2) | Takalaga (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome. Also the change description "various updates and changes" doesn't tell me absolutely anything useful about what you did - it's good as empty. It would be helpful to fellow mappers to describe the actual changes - and if i... commented 2025-11-30 10:16:13 UTC by martin-kokos ♦41 |
| 169498383 (Comments: 3) | Alex-r95 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ah. Prima. Dann passt's natürlich. Danke dir! Nebenbei: ich hab viele Notes in Tuttlingen erstellt. Schätze, einer der Mitmapper war mit diesem grausligen StreetComplete unterwegs, das etliche Tags verhaut. Falls du aus der Ecke bis... commented 2025-11-30 10:04:54 UTC by Geo-Tobi ♦303 |
| 21814309 (Comments: 2) | levd (Discussed changesets: 4) | Maar dit is wel heel lang geleden. 😀 commented 2025-11-30 10:03:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174187764 (Comments: 2) | KöWiMM (Discussed changesets: 20) | Du hast Recht, ich habe den tag gelöscht, es war ein Versehen. Ich war am editieren der Grundstückszufahrt zum Forsthaus. commented 2025-11-30 10:03:37 UTC by KöWiMM ♦16 |
| 175228401 (Comments: 1) | rza31 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Please don't remove `is_in:suburb=` here. Only unstructured `is_in=` is deprecated, not `is_in:*=` structured. There's no `boundary=administrative` to replace it. commented 2025-11-30 10:02:23 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175240922 (Comments: 3) | ziomio (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ciao, allora, non lo conosco con la certezza del 100%, ma un conoscente che lavora per una ditta che esegue quei lavori li, mi ha detto che fanno il percorso più breve e stanno in prossimità delle strade, in modo che siano facilmente ac... commented 2025-11-30 10:01:51 UTC by ziomio ♦17 |
| 174056437 (Comments: 3) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 34) | What's the source of these names? In example I would know how is this the only other foreign name of the Warsaw's Parade Square: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257924765/history/48 - one of the best known places in this city. commented 2025-11-30 10:01:50 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 175229756 (Comments: 1) | Tussi Lago (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454375745 Na parkingi jest dedykowany tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking commented 2025-11-30 09:47:49 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,049 |
| 175270436 (Comments: 4) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Korrektur, ich erfasse die Relation komplett neu, das ist eine alte Linie, die es so nicht mehr.. commented 2025-11-30 09:42:06 UTC by berndw ♦631 |
| 174917901 (Comments: 2) | Tomkow1933 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Będę na przyszłość szczególowo opisywał zmiany commented 2025-11-30 09:33:09 UTC by Tomkow1933 ♦8 |
| 130686955 (Comments: 1) | Mond00 (Discussed changesets: 78) | Hi, der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80539109 überquert eine Bahnlinie? commented 2025-11-30 09:27:26 UTC by chris66 ♦422 |
| 175300460 (Comments: 1) | szkwok (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don't change `name:zh=` to `name:yue-Hant=` , as the label of "Mandarin Chinese" is simply wrong or misapplied by default. It means unspecified Sinitic langauges. commented 2025-11-30 09:18:25 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175257629 (Comments: 1) | welzheimerwald (Discussed changesets: 48) | Grüß dich und vielen Dank für deine Bearbeitungen! Wenn du die Löschung in Isny und die Ergänzung am Gaisberg separiert hättest, wäre der Changeset nur halb so groß und damit deutlich besser kontrolli... commented 2025-11-30 09:16:48 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175294998 (Comments: 1) | LienusRob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301644546 wurde ein Wohngebiet virtuell unter Wasser gesetzt, das habe ich bereits korrigiert. Wahrscheinlich verklickt? Zum eigentl... commented 2025-11-30 09:12:08 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,140 |
| 175303364 (Comments: 1) | Max Smits (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi Max! Thank you for your edits. There is no road named after Eagles' Bridge. There is a square which is already mapped. "Eagles' Bridge" is also the name of the bridge, so bridge:name + noname=yes is used instead. ... commented 2025-11-30 08:56:05 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦744 |
| 85006438 (Comments: 4) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 344) | Bygningen du havde ændret til en lagertank var en uddannelsesbygning på Mercantec campus Viborg. Ved ikke hvor dit kortudsnit er fra men bestemt ikke der. commented 2025-11-30 08:48:32 UTC by kortgodt ♦114 |
| 175249019 (Comments: 1) | seewäldler (Discussed changesets: 16) | Danke dir! Ich hab noch source:maxspeed zu sign abgeändert :) commented 2025-11-30 08:48:05 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
 | 175243462 (Comments: 1) | Andreasl01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, same as for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175268301 commented 2025-11-30 08:46:01 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 10 (Comments: 2) | Petter Reinholdtsen (Discussed changesets: 3) | 2nd person to say anything on this changeset commented 2025-11-30 08:15:40 UTC by OSM Contributer ♦8 |
| 175275859 (Comments: 1) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 13) | The feature you added is actually a cutline, not an abandoned road. commented 2025-11-30 08:14:46 UTC by ika-chan! ♦309 |
| 175300702 (Comments: 1) | arjunaraoc (Discussed changesets: 14) | thanks for hint commented 2025-11-30 08:11:42 UTC by display sign name ♦2 |
| 175288450 (Comments: 1) | wjtje (Discussed changesets: 9) | Wat doet connect:lanes? Ik zie geen documentatie voor die tag of prefix. commented 2025-11-30 08:09:21 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦695 |
| 172478718 (Comments: 2) | kam_te12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | update in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175302485 commented 2025-11-30 08:08:13 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦38 |
| 175281921 (Comments: 2) | Dekker_Stan00 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tip.. Gebouwen kun je niet uitlijnen mbv een schuin genomen luchtfoto. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-30 08:08:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175302408 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 119) | Istniejący w wiki landuse=fairground nie zdaje się być praktykowany w OSM, tym bardziej prawidłowo. Skoro w bazie istnieją tak oznaczone wieloletnie jarmarki, które z definicji powinny być tymczasowe, to nie ma sensu tak degradować obie... commented 2025-11-30 08:05:27 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 175202386 (Comments: 1) | Léo_MdP (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Vous avez créé il y a 3 jour la plateforme du bus suivante : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454184418 Je ne sais pas s'il y a un rapport mais GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector donne l'erreur suivante : Street vehic... commented 2025-11-30 08:03:02 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 175292486 (Comments: 3) | levd (Discussed changesets: 4) | APK Station Uden op nieuw locatie gezet. Straatnaam gewijzigd in Sint Hubert. Schade verplaatste adressen hersteld. Voor laadpaal zie Wiki link. commented 2025-11-30 07:56:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175296794 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 117) | I fixed it; thanks for informing me! commented 2025-11-30 07:50:23 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦137 |
| 175277795 (Comments: 1) | RDPooler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4552958821 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-11-30 07:48:09 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175301485 (Comments: 1) | grindvis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag grindvis. Er is al een adres.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd op de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-30 07:41:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175293774 (Comments: 1) | Murphy4242 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice an address needs house number and street name. Everything else can usually be calculated. commented 2025-11-30 07:39:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175298296 (Comments: 1) | rlh100 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5456873932 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-11-30 07:32:04 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 81670268 (Comments: 1) | Frank170620004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Concernant le node/7257301048, je pense que la post_box est plutôt une letter_box selon le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box Pouvez-vous le confirmer ? (et corriger) commented 2025-11-30 07:30:25 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
| 81670324 (Comments: 1) | clementine123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Concernant le node/7257324689, je pense que c'est plutôt une letter_box qu'une post_box selon le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box Pouvez-vous le confirmer ? commented 2025-11-30 07:27:56 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
| 69712336 (Comments: 1) | SL&F (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Concernant le node/6437099409, il s'agirait plutôt d'une letter_box non ? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box) commented 2025-11-30 07:22:58 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
| 104357548 (Comments: 1) | Florent Wehrli (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, Concernant le node/8711833134, je me suis permis de passer de post_box à letter_box en suivant le [wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box) car cela ne ressemble pas à une boîte aux lettre... commented 2025-11-30 07:06:14 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
 | 175158304 (Comments: 2) | Marina_Agossou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Marina_Agossou, this error still exists, can I get your feedback here? Guido commented 2025-11-30 06:59:36 UTC by gscholz ♦2,805 |
| 172823309 (Comments: 1) | IngHue (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo IngHue, diese Ergänzung hat Fehler in der OSM-Datenbak durch überlappende Wege erzeugt (blaue Markierungen): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172823309 Explizit betroffen sind hier die Wege 1435271662 ... commented 2025-11-30 06:57:48 UTC by gscholz ♦2,805 |
| 143302446 (Comments: 1) | frutruc (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, Concernant le node 9624519811, je pense qu'il y a eu un loupé. On est passé d'une publicité à une boîte aux lettres. Vouliez-vous mettre "poster_box" au lieu de "billboard" p... commented 2025-11-30 06:44:18 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
| 88147630 (Comments: 1) | cdelayre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour Cette post_box semble avoir été retirée. Pouvez-vous le confirmer sur place ? commented 2025-11-30 06:34:28 UTC by LudovicG ♦105 |
| 175298247 (Comments: 2) | display sign name (Discussed changesets: 1) | You did mostly fine. You need to add religion tag as well. Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175300702#map=19/12.813081/77.564446 commented 2025-11-30 06:20:23 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175299302 (Comments: 1) | duckman56 (Discussed changesets: 14) | if there is a building=construction (that has completed) please re-tag it to some other building=* value and do any alignment fixes necessary instead of deleting it and re-adding the building on top. Preserving history of way's is important. Als... commented 2025-11-30 06:13:16 UTC by Udarian ♦536 |
| 175292351 (Comments: 1) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 20000 of your last 20000 changes were deletions. This is q... commented 2025-11-30 05:46:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175272561 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 242) | 新舊雙胞胎多。舉例 https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2grY --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175272561 commented 2025-11-30 05:33:55 UTC by jidanni ♦53 |
| 174224452 (Comments: 2) | jRodriguez928 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Also please use JOSM when editing such large areas. iD does not have a verification capacity to make sure you are uploading quality data. commented 2025-11-30 05:31:47 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦133 |
| 106978687 (Comments: 1) | kcpels (Discussed changesets: 8) | Atribuir “rua sem nome” como valor da tag name é uma edição incorrecta. Quando a via não possui nome oficial, não se deve inserir uma descrição no campo name. Para assinalar que a rua n&ati... commented 2025-11-30 04:55:14 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦205 |
| 175018657 (Comments: 1) | yukawa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo yukawa, wir löschen keine Gebäude, die noch sehr lange auf diversen Luftbildern zu sehen sind. Der Lebenszyklus-Namensraum kann verwendet werden, um den Status eines Objektes mit einem Präfix wie proposed, planned, cons... commented 2025-11-30 04:09:16 UTC by pitfire ♦707 |
 | 175268748 (Comments: 2) | CoyKoi (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hey - I was not planning on it. All yours :) commented 2025-11-30 03:44:42 UTC by CoyKoi ♦233 |
| 174508365 (Comments: 1) | JLZIMMERMANN (Discussed changesets: 52) | Please avoid using tag is_in= to describe locations or anything else. The tag is not widely used and almost always better alternatives exist such as this dedicated aed location tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator commented 2025-11-30 03:28:26 UTC by kabelhaai ♦66 |
| 175177957 (Comments: 5) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 104) | Thanks for mapping this. These new areas are not complete in Capad 2024 and I couldn’t readily find a source available to osm to use to add them all yet. I’ll work through Capad 2024 changes for now. The areas may meet the Capad criteria ... commented 2025-11-30 03:18:35 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 171764111 (Comments: 2) | OneSmootTall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, fixed commented 2025-11-30 02:58:17 UTC by OneSmootTall ♦1 |
| 172606735 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please use operator:wikidata=Q12859215 rather than the English label of that Wikidata item. commented 2025-11-30 01:17:30 UTC by Sd5605 ♦3 |
| 175231652 (Comments: 2) | canofcatfood (Discussed changesets: 3) | I see you have added names to outer ways of a few individual areas of other NP sections. I now think that is a valid way to name explicit parts with the parks. commented 2025-11-30 01:02:13 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 160375986 (Comments: 1) | bbearlala (Discussed changesets: 2) | government的值不能填「國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會」。 commented 2025-11-30 00:49:32 UTC by Sd5605 ♦3 |
| 175199884 (Comments: 1) | aakkkaa (Discussed changesets: 12) | здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. вы, если обьект открываете, удаляйте префиксы planned: commented 2025-11-30 00:36:54 UTC by 4004 ♦1,926 |
| 159104995 (Comments: 1) | TLC10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Assuming that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249561327/history has "Smyths Transport" in it I'd be tempted to add an "office=company" node in there to help people locate it. I don't think that people will find just ... commented 2025-11-30 00:10:26 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 175293969 (Comments: 5) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | I've already stopped. I'm currently just reverting my edits. Why would we not be able to use opendata though? commented 2025-11-30 00:07:20 UTC by DFace Peter ♦3 |
| 175294926 (Comments: 1) | HexAvo (Discussed changesets: 1) | EDIT: También he añadido el carril bici del Camino nuevo de Picanya commented 2025-11-30 00:01:42 UTC by HexAvo ♦1 |
| 175294748 (Comments: 1) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 53) | forgot sources again. ): Bing streetside, © 3DBAG by tudelft3d and 3DGI commented 2025-11-29 23:59:34 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 174307257 (Comments: 1) | Chuckton (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sidewalks in OpenStreetMap are paths alongside a street, paths that run parallel to the carriageway. So these are not sidewalks commented 2025-11-29 23:57:03 UTC by cuzi ♦134 |
| 174307059 (Comments: 1) | Chuckton (Discussed changesets: 3) | Why did you remove the crossing tags on several ways? commented 2025-11-29 23:53:50 UTC by cuzi ♦134 |
| 175293953 (Comments: 2) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Eu já me apercebi. Acho que a solução é mesmo partir em tranches. Peço desculpa... commented 2025-11-29 23:26:03 UTC by DFace Peter ♦3 |
| 175282229 (Comments: 1) | Blue_on_the_time (Discussed changesets: 27) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19057 commented 2025-11-29 23:22:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 167869564 (Comments: 4) | 4004 (Discussed changesets: 119) | not sure, cemetery sounds like a shop selling cemetery plots. grave accessories is very specific, but doesnt look like anyone had that idea as I dont see a single one in taginfo commented 2025-11-29 23:17:53 UTC by 4004 ♦1,926 |
| 154599775 (Comments: 1) | diodaix (Discussed changesets: 7) | Tidak direkomendasikan menggunakan jalan dan sungai sebagai bagian dari relasi batas administrasi. Akan ada kesulitan di kemudian hari dalam memperbaruinya. commented 2025-11-29 23:17:40 UTC by FajrAl ♦113 |
| 175293786 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-11-29 23:11:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 174924462 (Comments: 3) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 259) | Thanks! commented 2025-11-29 23:11:03 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 175175098 (Comments: 1) | Erlen Dur (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello, you have confused the old geometry with the new section already drawen of Route 7. I have revert this change. Regards. commented 2025-11-29 23:04:33 UTC by jptolosa ♦217 |
| 175283856 (Comments: 1) | Peter Motte (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, from where have you added this (and other) housenames? From surveying (seeing in person) or some other source or map? commented 2025-11-29 22:49:15 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦129 |
| 175293537 (Comments: 1) | Peter Motte (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi - could you please put your changes within the same changeset? splitting them out like this creates a lot of pressure on OSM's rendering servers and is generally seen as spam. thanks! commented 2025-11-29 22:49:12 UTC by applecuckoo ♦2 |
| 121040070 (Comments: 7) | ITineris (Discussed changesets: 71) | Elemekre csak akkor rakom az accuracy-t, ha az én pontossági elvárásaimnak megfelelően mérek (azaz több perces statikus mérés). Elemekre source-ot sosem rakok, sőt törölni is szoktam. ... commented 2025-11-29 22:44:53 UTC by ITineris ♦395 |
| 168409851 (Comments: 1) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 20) | This changeset removed all access to the weigh station --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168409851 commented 2025-11-29 22:41:18 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,137 |
 | 175293343 (Comments: 1) | JanezPavelZebovec (Discussed changesets: 9) | Pa tudi nekaj popravkov na HE Medvode in v bližini Mednega. commented 2025-11-29 22:40:47 UTC by JanezPavelZebovec ♦16 |
| 175293137 (Comments: 1) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 53) | Bing streetside was also a source commented 2025-11-29 22:37:21 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 175288646 (Comments: 1) | finn-hound (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.dublinhistoricmaps.ie/kingstown/maps/index.html Source commented 2025-11-29 22:25:53 UTC by finn-hound ♦9 |
| 175288742 (Comments: 1) | finn-hound (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.dublinhistoricmaps.ie/kingstown/maps/index.html Source commented 2025-11-29 22:25:48 UTC by finn-hound ♦9 |
| 175288798 (Comments: 1) | finn-hound (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.dublinhistoricmaps.ie/kingstown/maps/index.html Source commented 2025-11-29 22:25:44 UTC by finn-hound ♦9 |
| 175289072 (Comments: 1) | finn-hound (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.dublinhistoricmaps.ie/kingstown/maps/index.html Source commented 2025-11-29 22:25:38 UTC by finn-hound ♦9 |
| 175292215 (Comments: 1) | finn-hound (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.dublinhistoricmaps.ie/kingstown/maps/index.html Source commented 2025-11-29 22:25:22 UTC by finn-hound ♦9 |
| 175292961 (Comments: 1) | finn-hound (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://collections.lib.uwm.edu/digital/collection/agdm/id/5864/rec/11 Source commented 2025-11-29 22:21:19 UTC by finn-hound ♦9 |
| 132076213 (Comments: 3) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 168) | Valid point. In English as usually translation from and to English are better than other translations. However, best is to write in a language you're confortable with and add an automatic translation stating that it's an automatic transl... commented 2025-11-29 22:04:39 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 175286598 (Comments: 1) | cnorts225 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Some of the features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it ... commented 2025-11-29 21:59:39 UTC by MassCartog ♦246 |
| 101043506 (Comments: 3) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 308) | The person who added https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4518625 says "Address for this place is completly wrong". I presume they're using Nominatim to work out the address. Part of the problem is that there's no address on the h... commented 2025-11-29 21:47:13 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 175291840 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-29 21:42:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175291072 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-29 21:42:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175291027 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 9) | 👍 commented 2025-11-29 21:42:01 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 175290255 (Comments: 2) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-29 21:41:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175291947 (Comments: 1) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi DFace Peter, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: No primary map features!? Could you please ... commented 2025-11-29 21:39:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175291912 (Comments: 1) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi DFace Peter, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: No primary map features!? Could you please ... commented 2025-11-29 21:38:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175291878 (Comments: 1) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi DFace Peter, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 9164 building(s) Could you please confirm... commented 2025-11-29 21:37:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 168681942 (Comments: 1) | Voonosm (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413432648 tu as oubliés de mettre l'attribut poteau sur les noeuds :) si tu as le courage, la ligne est incomplète vers le sud. au nord, je sais que la ligne passe en souterra... commented 2025-11-29 21:37:08 UTC by Marc_ch ♦289 |
| 175283634 (Comments: 1) | Jazz37 (Discussed changesets: 13) | good afternoon Jazz, Just a small comment about some of the crossings you've been adding like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454697829. this should be a unmarked crossing with the tags `highway=crossing crossing=unmarked`. a mark... commented 2025-11-29 21:32:38 UTC by kitsee ♦115 |
 | 175291611 (Comments: 1) | anirud (Discussed changesets: 22) | The added path exists, I walked it. There are many more stairs (steps), but I don't have an exact track, they're not visible on any aerial photo I tried, and I'm no longer there and can't re-survey. commented 2025-11-29 21:31:40 UTC by anirud ♦16 |
| 175291721 (Comments: 1) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi DFace Peter, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: No primary map features!? Could you please ... commented 2025-11-29 21:31:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175246742 (Comments: 1) | ShiauPa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385503805 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454475773 compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447893113... commented 2025-11-29 21:31:24 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦850 |
| 175291599 (Comments: 1) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi DFace Peter, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: No primary map features!? Could you please ... commented 2025-11-29 21:27:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175291558 (Comments: 1) | DFace Peter (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi DFace Peter, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 3612 building(s) Could you please confirm... commented 2025-11-29 21:26:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175289428 (Comments: 1) | RACHID_BEN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't add things that don't exist. There's no rest area in the middle of a road. commented 2025-11-29 21:21:06 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 167360598 (Comments: 2) | leveskockaa (Discussed changesets: 36) | Szia! JOSM megjelenítést próbálgattam, rajta maradt véletlen. Leszedtem. commented 2025-11-29 21:18:20 UTC by leveskockaa ♦63 |
| 164533955 (Comments: 1) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 197) | I agree. When the projects begin, I will add those sections back. commented 2025-11-29 21:15:41 UTC by Raymo853 ♦9 |
| 174709021 (Comments: 2) | FTP123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It is not a duplicate. I have driven by this location multiple times and can confim that the google street view from (NOV/2025) is up to date and macthes the cameras I saw as of this message, 11.29.2025. There is one FLOCK camera strapped on an older... commented 2025-11-29 21:10:33 UTC by FTP123 ♦1 |
| 174811998 (Comments: 1) | MontiegeQ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour ces améliorations. pour info palmier n'est pas une espèce mais un taxon de famille. cela se renseigne en allant dans le bas du menu à gauche dans la zone attributs avec taxon=Arecaceae (avec une ... commented 2025-11-29 21:06:45 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,313 |
 | 166714428 (Comments: 2) | Walter Mayeku (Discussed changesets: 8) | Excuse me Yunan, I don't think you have any rights to communicate the way you did. If you felt that Bing is old you should know how to communicate what you want to say in a respectable manner. If you feel Guyane is your special country i... commented 2025-11-29 21:06:42 UTC by Walter Mayeku ♦11 |
| 175290278 (Comments: 1) | czdawes (Discussed changesets: 2) | w/1454750955 is not a swimming pool source: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/icrC5QEfdKtjqGSubelU8Q commented 2025-11-29 21:01:44 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦24 |
| 166535017 (Comments: 1) | MiLorde (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388293789 la construction semble être terminée commented 2025-11-29 21:01:05 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,313 |
| 138686591 (Comments: 2) | lukiz82 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nie, droga jest już normalnie przejezdna commented 2025-11-29 20:40:24 UTC by lukiz82 ♦1 |
| 175260484 (Comments: 1) | cohenjkimmel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175260484 commented 2025-11-29 20:39:07 UTC by Glassman ♦5,634 |
| 175281314 (Comments: 1) | Tossal Redó (Discussed changesets: 6) | En este changeset se han eliminado nombres de muchos polígonos industriales sin justificar el cambio y no los ha repuesto por otros nombres. Se ha modificado el idioma de la etiqueta name contraviniendo aquello que está estableci... commented 2025-11-29 20:39:05 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,710 |
| 175260447 (Comments: 1) | cohenjkimmel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175260447 commented 2025-11-29 20:38:56 UTC by Glassman ♦5,634 |
| 175287110 (Comments: 2) | ovidiuionut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut, Breteaua spre Spătaru nu a fost deschisă. De la inaugurare era blocată cu parapete de beton. Nu am modificat corpul autostrăzii la sud de Buzău. Am modificat breteaua pentru ieșire provizorie la Stâlpu, care este și ea &i... commented 2025-11-29 20:30:55 UTC by ovidiuionut ♦1 |
| 175127627 (Comments: 4) | Bzzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Come again? No free map service provider has current photos of this location yet, but there's a) Tesla stating that there are additional Tesla Supercharger stalls since about June, and b) there's this https://maps.app.goo.gl/e71ao1h9bvDR2w4... commented 2025-11-29 20:25:22 UTC by Bzzz ♦1 |
 | 141484067 (Comments: 1) | dezhpoor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello You have used the wrong tags in your business listing. I have corrected one of them. Please fix the errors within two weeks or your listing for this location will be reported. commented 2025-11-29 20:15:43 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦426 |
| 55383879 (Comments: 1) | Bigmorr (Discussed changesets: 14) | shop=bookmaker是簽注站，出版社是office=publisher。 commented 2025-11-29 20:00:20 UTC by Sd5605 ♦3 |
| 175282166 (Comments: 1) | Brightsidio's Travels (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the addition to the map! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175282166 commented 2025-11-29 19:59:45 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175275157 (Comments: 1) | Saherr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Verified this as a good change but note that the tag "name=*" is generally for the signed or established name for a feature, not the general name for it. Unless the area is literally called "site" this name tag should be removed.<... commented 2025-11-29 19:56:51 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 168662840 (Comments: 1) | ENIGMAT (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - zastosuj się, proszę commented 2025-11-29 19:56:12 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 170455599 (Comments: 1) | ENIGMAT (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - zastosuj się, proszę commented 2025-11-29 19:55:52 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175184992 (Comments: 1) | ENIGMAT (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - zastosuj się, proszę commented 2025-11-29 19:55:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175288088 (Comments: 1) | ENIGMAT (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - zastosuj się, proszę commented 2025-11-29 19:55:16 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175288306 (Comments: 1) | marri06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, cambio los " ele" por "height" en https://osm.org/node/1916887139/history https://osm.org/node/1916887146/history https://osm.org/node/1916887147/history https://osm.org/node/1916887148/history https://o... commented 2025-11-29 19:55:02 UTC by aTarom ♦847 |
| 174013146 (Comments: 1) | K3X (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, bitte tagge Brücken nicht als Tunnel. Du kannst stattdessen z.B. covered=yes nutzen. commented 2025-11-29 19:50:01 UTC by Laci ♦41 |
| 175283413 (Comments: 1) | Jazz37 (Discussed changesets: 13) | TY for adding the paths! Noticed they're not connected to each other and they don't seem to connect to any of the other paths. Is that intentional? It leaves https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454696669 entirely disconnected. ... commented 2025-11-29 19:44:58 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175285507 (Comments: 1) | Peter Ševčík (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, dĺžku môžete pridávať ako length, nadmorskú výšku nie je nutné uvádzať na desatiné miesto, pokiaľ je desatiné miesto rovné nule, neuvádzajte skrá... commented 2025-11-29 19:09:41 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,032 |
| 175287443 (Comments: 1) | RavenStar83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | :) commented 2025-11-29 18:56:10 UTC by dragofuego ♦1 |
| 174161368 (Comments: 3) | euvanet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Paul, concerning osm.org/way/378932928 I changed again the value for "surface" from "unpaved" to "compacted", because in those parts the double track is made of compacted earth. At osm.org/way/301906082 the ... commented 2025-11-29 18:54:43 UTC by euvanet ♦1 |
| 175287295 (Comments: 1) | gersc2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-29 18:51:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 174780648 (Comments: 4) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 64) | Okay, I'd say that `highest_point` is a little different than other "important features" because it's fundamental to the physical 3D shape of feature, bounding the feature by the z axis while the multipolygon ways bound it by the ... commented 2025-11-29 18:46:54 UTC by quincylvania ♦69 |
| 175287404 (Comments: 1) | ftrebien (Discussed changesets: 40) | Datas das imagens: 2025-01-01, 2025-02-10, 2025-02-25, 2025-03-14, 2025-04-28, 2025-05-13, 2025-06-10, 2025-06-25, 2025-07-10, 2025-08-21, 2025-09-23, 2025-10-08, 2025-10-23, 2025-11-19. commented 2025-11-29 18:46:05 UTC by ftrebien ♦175 |
| 175285829 (Comments: 1) | kkkfdk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. When finishing a changeset, please use a more descriptive title than just a point, or else it's hard to know what you did. Also, please consider using points instead of adding the info of the business to the building. commented 2025-11-29 18:40:28 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175287170 (Comments: 1) | ftrebien (Discussed changesets: 40) | Datas das imagens: 2025-01-01, 2025-02-10, 2025-02-25, 2025-03-14, 2025-04-28, 2025-05-13, 2025-06-10, 2025-06-25, 2025-07-10, 2025-08-21, 2025-09-23, 2025-10-08, 2025-10-23, 2025-11-19. Desta vez a segmentação foi manual, produzindo um... commented 2025-11-29 18:38:48 UTC by ftrebien ♦175 |
 | 174956169 (Comments: 1) | OfekM10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | שלום אופק האם זה המקום של הברז? אני מכיר ברז מעט דרומה יותר בתחנה של מקורות. commented 2025-11-29 18:37:58 UTC by hatul ♦422 |
| 175286954 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 72) | Note: you may think Yau King Lane etc. does not deserve to be `=secondary`. I agree with you. However: - temporary mapping measure due to Wang Fuk Court fire; Tai Po needs access to Tai Po Road - even if no fire, Yau King Lane itself... commented 2025-11-29 18:33:01 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦67 |
| 174247510 (Comments: 3) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 64) | @dmjab13 You're probably right. @ZLima12 I see your point, but as someone who's worked a lot with OSM data, I do feel strongly that we should try to minimize inconsistencies. More than 99% of all ways tagged `highway` are roads and p... commented 2025-11-29 18:27:15 UTC by quincylvania ♦69 |
| 175254989 (Comments: 16) | ThomasA (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ja det bliver jo godt nok meget enklere. Jeg kan egentlig godt lide ideen om attributter fremfor separate veje. Det bliver "geometrisk" enklere, men informationen er der stadig. commented 2025-11-29 18:26:19 UTC by ThomasA ♦24 |
| 161167038 (Comments: 2) | Yourice (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks great! Thanks :) commented 2025-11-29 18:18:51 UTC by Yourice ♦7 |
| 152213861 (Comments: 2) | eteb3 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Thanks, corrected commented 2025-11-29 18:13:13 UTC by eteb3 ♦124 |
| 174674148 (Comments: 2) | norberto69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes but this has been recently permanently removed and covered with trees. Driveway to main road no longer exists. commented 2025-11-29 18:12:50 UTC by norberto69 ♦1 |
| 169283436 (Comments: 2) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, yes it's just a typo on the keyboard where I forgot the S Sorry commented 2025-11-29 18:08:37 UTC by pierre_geovelo ♦19 |
| 128603036 (Comments: 1) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10166843552/history has bicycle_parking = stand that was added in this edit bicycle_parking=stands was probably intended here, right? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking note... commented 2025-11-29 18:03:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 171776080 (Comments: 1) | Lucie_MAITRE (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10599800972/history has bicycle_parking = stand that was added in this edit bicycle_parking=stands was probably intended here, right? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking note... commented 2025-11-29 18:03:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175153629 (Comments: 4) | Sretne (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zrobione - jeśli proponujesz coś poprawić czy zmienić to zapraszam do rozmowy/edycji :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175285923 commented 2025-11-29 18:01:38 UTC by stasiu512 ♦199 |
| 175089997 (Comments: 3) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 134) | Cześć, dzięki za dodanie brakującej relacji. Mam parę uwag poza tą którą zgłosił SzymonH (ogólnie linkuję jeden obiekt, ale zwykle dot. to więcej niż 1), zachęcam też do stosowania w przypadku innych tras: |
| 152487348 (Comments: 2) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 80) | Za jakiej racji ulica Inwalidzka to Residental? Żadne auto osobowe nie przejedzie tą drogą commented 2025-11-29 17:44:31 UTC by JulesGabrielVerne ♦118 |
| 174868582 (Comments: 1) | DanieleLalli (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Daniele, thanks for your contributions to OSM! I had to revert this changeset because it deleted a part of the route and broke three route relations as a result (see details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175283697), so people co... commented 2025-11-29 17:36:08 UTC by paulbrunner ♦63 |
| 175200129 (Comments: 3) | Abno85 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, also - ich gehe mal davon aus das da wirklich 30 ist - In maxspeed gehören immer numerische werte. Also maxspeed=30 ist richtig so wie du es getagged hast. In source:maxspeed (oder maxspeed:type) taggen wir noch woher eine Geschw... commented 2025-11-29 17:35:32 UTC by flohoff ♦2,408 |
| 174899432 (Comments: 5) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 80) | Byłem w terenie i zrobiłem całą dokumentacje i nic się nie zgadza z tym co narysowałaś commented 2025-11-29 17:30:54 UTC by JulesGabrielVerne ♦118 |
| 144074817 (Comments: 1) | mappymary (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11353109560/history has bicycle_parking = stand that was added in this edit bicycle_parking=stands was probably intended here, right? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking note... commented 2025-11-29 17:22:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 134929639 (Comments: 1) | Tris Wilson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10813996350/history has bicycle_parking = stand that was added in this edit bicycle_parking=stands was probably intended here, right? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking note... commented 2025-11-29 17:22:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175140624 (Comments: 3) | Ana Luisa (Discussed changesets: 40) | Deshalb verlasse ich mich auf meine Routenüberwachung. Gerade wieder eine nummer gefunden wo jemand zwar das highway=construction entfernt hatte - aber das construction=yes drauf gelassen hat. Und dann aber mit motor_vehicle=yes und co verzweife... commented 2025-11-29 17:21:43 UTC by flohoff ♦2,408 |
| 175226833 (Comments: 1) | glaubinger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, cool das du mit mappst. Ich hab hier den changeset gesehen weil der das routing verändert hat. Der Durchgangsverkehr von Gestringen nach Westen ging durch Fabbenstedt: Das hier zeigts - Rot alt - Grün neu. https://osm... commented 2025-11-29 17:20:15 UTC by flohoff ♦2,408 |
| 173810078 (Comments: 1) | Max Kleinehelleforth (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin, ich bin hier gerade über den changeset gestolpert - und der ist gigantisch. So kann man die kaum nachvollziehen was du gemacht hast. Magst du die demnächst vielleicht ein bisschen kleiner machen damit man das nachvoll... commented 2025-11-29 17:05:12 UTC by flohoff ♦2,408 |
| 174147156 (Comments: 3) | Raymo853 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Found the changeset that deleted one of them: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164533955 commented 2025-11-29 17:04:27 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦60 |
| 153383231 (Comments: 1) | busnotturno95 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Broken roundabout, marked as one way road and in a clockwise direction... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153383231 commented 2025-11-29 17:00:11 UTC by skizz98 ♦5 |
| 175212004 (Comments: 5) | streetuser (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hier im übrigen ein Blogpost von mir von 2009 wo ich mal die Amtsblätter der Kreise GT und ein bisschen Gemüse komplett durchgeackert habe. https://f.zz.de/posts/200908121002.openstreetmap_gefahrgutstrassengrundnetz/ commented 2025-11-29 16:57:50 UTC by flohoff ♦2,408 |
| 175172378 (Comments: 1) | spam46200 (Discussed changesets: 16) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175282893 Automat ali nie istnieje. Dzięki za znalezienie. commented 2025-11-29 16:33:25 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,185 |
| 173940736 (Comments: 6) | valaise (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks I will read through that resource. Since 2014, do you know if the OSM building positions have been updated with more recent survey data? Do you know if there is any ongoing process to update this data? I checked the current building foo... commented 2025-11-29 16:32:30 UTC by valaise ♦19 |
| 175277718 (Comments: 4) | KapnocShiberet (Discussed changesets: 3) | Understandable, and thank you! New on this, just trying to help. commented 2025-11-29 16:25:27 UTC by KapnocShiberet ♦1 |
 | 175268947 (Comments: 1) | Aidsoid (Discussed changesets: 2) | rv: bus_station — это совершенно другой тип объекта, а именно автовокзал, как на Ортачале; на нём производится посадка пассажиров на разные н... commented 2025-11-29 16:19:32 UTC by yelisey90 ♦205 |
| 175272006 (Comments: 1) | Aidsoid (Discussed changesets: 2) | По кадастру адрес — д. 27 по Университетской ( https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal ). По сравнению с ним приоритет только у табличек на зданиях (например, на ... commented 2025-11-29 16:14:58 UTC by yelisey90 ♦205 |
| 175274962 (Comments: 1) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 13) | Γιατί άλλαξες εδώ την ταξινόμηση; δεν θα έπρεπε η σ&upsilo... commented 2025-11-29 15:50:41 UTC by PeachyOne ♦28 |
| 175274895 (Comments: 1) | KapnocShiberet (Discussed changesets: 3) | Both crossings are marked. commented 2025-11-29 15:48:52 UTC by Wulf4096 ♦165 |
| 175256814 (Comments: 3) | Guido Groet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dank je wel, ik ben nog lerende. commented 2025-11-29 15:44:20 UTC by Guido Groet ♦1 |
| 174741361 (Comments: 1) | DaveGeog (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks for fixing up lots of these! commented 2025-11-29 15:39:09 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦129 |
| 175275786 (Comments: 1) | KapnocShiberet (Discussed changesets: 3) | This appears to be incorrect. commented 2025-11-29 15:33:07 UTC by Wulf4096 ♦165 |
| 175260088 (Comments: 1) | Sir Bekarton (Discussed changesets: 3) | Why did you remove a bunch of trees from campus? I haven't been on campus for a few months, but I really doubt all of those trees have been removed. commented 2025-11-29 15:31:27 UTC by Eiim ♦32 |
| 175260185 (Comments: 1) | Sir Bekarton (Discussed changesets: 3) | It looks like you mapped a number of desire paths as footways. At a minimum, these should be mapped with informal=yes. From personal experience, I can also say that these change fairly frequently, so unless you've checked these paths recently, I... commented 2025-11-29 15:29:10 UTC by Eiim ♦32 |
| 175259442 (Comments: 1) | Sir Bekarton (Discussed changesets: 3) | The building you added is Thomson Hall, which was demolished last winter, along with the parking lot and nearby paths. I've reverted this changeset in 175280317. commented 2025-11-29 15:25:53 UTC by Eiim ♦32 |
| 162025344 (Comments: 10) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 169) | > więc tak naprawdę mógłbym po prostu własnoręcznie dodać każdą ze stref ręczne przerysowanie też byłoby importem commented 2025-11-29 15:22:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 142322568 (Comments: 1) | MHD (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226648313/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:52:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 124603105 (Comments: 1) | Schaukelflieger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129357826/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:52:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 146867922 (Comments: 1) | Silvester Reichow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167973437/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:52:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 156692477 (Comments: 1) | Turquoi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152636031/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:52:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 142351945 (Comments: 1) | sesan100 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156977549/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:50:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 154115285 (Comments: 1) | gregorjoef (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282415131/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:49:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 142930796 (Comments: 1) | KlausSch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371661165/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:49:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 157339995 (Comments: 1) | Kniffir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34056400/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would surf... commented 2025-11-29 14:49:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 134506583 (Comments: 1) | Andreas Bluhm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31026421/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would surf... commented 2025-11-29 14:49:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 156309295 (Comments: 1) | JBaum (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721907649/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:49:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 156094062 (Comments: 1) | jogging-stats (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294972977/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would sur... commented 2025-11-29 14:49:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 157821105 (Comments: 1) | Benedikt1983 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38359390/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would surf... commented 2025-11-29 14:49:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 153788051 (Comments: 1) | Euchrid-e (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148852603/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt Would su... commented 2025-11-29 14:49:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175141467 (Comments: 9) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 124) | Hallo Guido, Sie haben sich geirrt. Ich glaube, Sie wollten diesen Link einfügen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174943069 :) In einer solchen Situation ist es tatsächlich besser, den Nutzer zu kontaktieren, der ht... commented 2025-11-29 14:47:02 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦39 |
| 61537497 (Comments: 1) | francis debrah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615841160/history has shop = warehouse that was added in this edit shop=warehouse ? Is it place renting small space for people to store their stuff? If yes then it is shop=storage_rental - or is it some oth... commented 2025-11-29 14:42:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175157158 (Comments: 2) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 25) | Quite possibly made an errir. Thank you for fixing this. commented 2025-11-29 14:36:48 UTC by Adam Edwards ♦17 |
 | 174131090 (Comments: 1) | Stu D (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi. It is nonsense to put name:it on streets in a spanish speaking country. commented 2025-11-29 14:30:09 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 142408712 (Comments: 1) | irBart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, quel est la source pour le fait qu'ils font du bio ? je n'ai rien vu à ce sujet sur leur site Cordialement, Marc commented 2025-11-29 14:23:39 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,313 |
| 157769805 (Comments: 1) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 67) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390789319/history - jesteś pewien że tory są rozebrane? commented 2025-11-29 14:18:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 162744030 (Comments: 1) | Jose Riha (Discussed changesets: 75) | No neviem, budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26409901 sa nevola cela TS888 (len transformator na boku). amenity=cafe ste nechali ale zrusili nazov a ostatne udaje? Nazov tam dodnes je, ale ze by nefungovala? Na dverach otvaracie hodiny nema, a... commented 2025-11-29 14:18:00 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 156893292 (Comments: 2) | radgoat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the question! The key 동 is simply the Korean word for “building number” or “block number” used inside an apartment complex (for example: 101동, 102동…). It is my mistake. commented 2025-11-29 14:17:09 UTC by radgoat ♦1 |
| 174731935 (Comments: 7) | Pan_palat (Discussed changesets: 14) | crowning achievement of this vandal was retagging driveway to abandoned railway station as highway=secondary because it has status of "droga wojewódzka 219", see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264203873/history commented 2025-11-29 14:08:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 174812671 (Comments: 1) | Elena_ausWien (Discussed changesets: 11) | Heißen die Straßen des Verteilerkreis wirklich offiziell "Verteilerkreis Favoriten"? Wenn nein sollten die Namen zurück geändert werden. commented 2025-11-29 14:03:08 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦16 |
| 129797298 (Comments: 2) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 303) | Dzięki, poprawiłem commented 2025-11-29 14:02:32 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 170017357 (Comments: 1) | towc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, just because you didn't find a housenumber on the building it does not mean it has none. If you read the 'fixme' tag you would know we actually have multiple to choose from here, from official sources. So please do not make ... commented 2025-11-29 13:59:24 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 175204028 (Comments: 2) | Aquachippy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the heads up, I've now dowloaded Street Complete to try out. commented 2025-11-29 13:58:59 UTC by Aquachippy ♦1 |
| 172234447 (Comments: 2) | OttoR (Discussed changesets: 69) | Probably a typo. fixed it to be 4 commented 2025-11-29 13:51:36 UTC by OttoR ♦65 |
| 175266498 (Comments: 1) | BerryTrails (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please change the road classification only when it does not conform to the criteria established by the community. commented 2025-11-29 13:50:59 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175261679 (Comments: 1) | canofcatfood (Discussed changesets: 3) | It is best practice not to join areas to roadway centreline nodes. In this case the conservation area border probably ends near the property line or fence line. Not mixing or joining roadway parts makes it easier for data users. commented 2025-11-29 13:49:40 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 175074353 (Comments: 1) | Palgrave Peter (Discussed changesets: 39) | Oops - I think that this might have introduced a gap in the Greensand Way. I filled it in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175276055 . It's really an iD bug - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/id-visibility-of-relations/138... commented 2025-11-29 13:47:10 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦480 |
| 175272233 (Comments: 1) | Twanted (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM.. Dit is Cox 15 Er is al een adresnode. Import vanuit het Kadaster (BAG) Ik heb Juttepeer 15 verwijderd. Wanneer de adressen niet kloppen dan svp een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster. Juttepeer 15 bestaat niet in Ol... commented 2025-11-29 13:45:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175086131 (Comments: 2) | Jean-Baptiste Le Coz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Désolé, je fais un peu un travail de bulldozer... je trace et recale en masse depuis la heatmap de strava, j'essaye d'être conservateur, mais ça marche pas toujours... commented 2025-11-29 13:44:26 UTC by Jean-Baptiste Le Coz ♦1 |
| 93684036 (Comments: 1) | ti-lo (Discussed changesets: 868) | this was not a good edit. The car: prefix is not really widely used when compared with second_hand and service:vehicle-Prefix commented 2025-11-29 13:39:29 UTC by redd ♦448 |
| 175261634 (Comments: 1) | canofcatfood (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the conservation park is mapped as a boundary relation and the name is added to the relation only. The members forming the mp should remain untagged. Same for multipolygon relations. Exception would be if the way added to the relation is an en... commented 2025-11-29 13:39:28 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 175102058 (Comments: 1) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, I've mp idea whether it was your edit here, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5487096 now has some gaps in it - see http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=5487096 . Best Regards, Andy commented 2025-11-29 13:27:12 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 173337857 (Comments: 9) | RI9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aha, OK. Už rozumiem. Áno niektorý ľudia môžu pokračovať za bránu. Jedná sa o súkromný pozemok. commented 2025-11-29 13:26:41 UTC by RI9 ♦1 |
| 175129697 (Comments: 1) | Pmz (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, en prolongeant un chemin au-delà de sa jonction avec le chemin suivant dans la relation. Je m'occupe de ... commented 2025-11-29 13:23:41 UTC by StC ♦377 |
| 175114505 (Comments: 1) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, Not sure how it happened but there's now a bit of a gap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2894908#map=19/51.699189/-3.628884 ? commented 2025-11-29 13:19:54 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 175256383 (Comments: 3) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 53) | ah bedankt voor het fixen commented 2025-11-29 13:12:51 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 170763673 (Comments: 3) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hallo Michael, danke für deine schnelle Antwort. Die Quellenangabe ist im OSM Wiki hier dokumentiert: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#Specific_values Wenn du keine Fremden Quellen außer OSM Daten selber verwendest,... commented 2025-11-29 13:06:53 UTC by redd ♦448 |
| 175178417 (Comments: 1) | neoLithos (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre (probablement en rallongeant un chemin au-delà de son point de jonction avec le point suivant dans l'itinéraire). Je m... commented 2025-11-29 13:03:50 UTC by StC ♦377 |
| 174381029 (Comments: 2) | Hydranten_Rosengarten (Discussed changesets: 2) | @rempshaener, vielen Dank für die Information. Ich hatte leider die Info über den Tag nicht aus dem Wiki genommen, sondern von den Anderen aus der Umgebung übernommen. Ich werde das beim nächsten Datensatz mit aufrä... commented 2025-11-29 12:58:26 UTC by Hydranten_Rosengarten ♦1 |
| 170120284 (Comments: 3) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 12) | Przy okazji wycofałem też kilka edycji, które również psuły nazwy (zmiana kilku ukraińskich obwodów na "województwa") commented 2025-11-29 12:57:10 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦811 |
| 175263522 (Comments: 1) | LeChampenois (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci pour l'ajout de POIs (points d'intérêt)! C'est très apprécié! commented 2025-11-29 12:56:59 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦447 |
| 172322327 (Comments: 3) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 16) | Leider keine Antwort, daher revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175273881 commented 2025-11-29 12:46:17 UTC by Metzor ♦394 |
| 175225640 (Comments: 1) | OpenStreetMap678 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! You've extended https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46343328 here up towards the north of Callendar. Previously, e.g. at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2gqC , the national park boundary followed the river. Now... commented 2025-11-29 12:43:03 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 175258168 (Comments: 1) | AM329 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution ! Cependant, la source indiquée n’est pas utilisable sur OpenStreetMap : les conditions d’utilisation de Google Maps interdisent son utilisation dans ce contexte. Vous pouvez voir... commented 2025-11-29 12:38:33 UTC by Ltrlg ♦94 |
| 175255799 (Comments: 1) | Jajakhane (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, pourriez-vous remplir le commentaire de modification à l’avenir ? Entre autres avantages, ça rend les historique plus lisibles. [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications]. <... commented 2025-11-29 12:32:06 UTC by Ltrlg ♦94 |
| 175271849 (Comments: 1) | Leszek999 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - zastosuj się, proszę commented 2025-11-29 12:22:09 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175058919 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 558) | Thanks, Mateusz, for cleaning this up! commented 2025-11-29 12:15:26 UTC by Metzor ♦394 |
| 175238467 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 63) | Thanks for the heads-up, I restored the intersections caused. I hope it's solved. commented 2025-11-29 12:08:01 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦227 |
| 174748983 (Comments: 12) | Alexey Vazhnov (Discussed changesets: 34) | @Alexey, i gues we can remap some of your changes coz Marek is not trying to remap details like smoothness, that you added and he removed? commented 2025-11-29 11:55:38 UTC by Yog Sot ♦361 |
| 171346952 (Comments: 4) | Shel_Sri (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for sharing these Gregory, very helpful. commented 2025-11-29 11:55:13 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦6 |
| 123330151 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 278) | Tak tu cyklocestu ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172636950 pozdlz Dvojkriznej ste si dobre vymysleli. Fakt kvalitne vyriesenie "fixme". Je to tam uplne inak. Nie su tam ziadne oddelene cesty, vsade idu cyklisti po chodniku, alebo v p... commented 2025-11-29 11:48:03 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 175202283 (Comments: 4) | Jaymap5432 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Betreft node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2680434591. Je hebt daar een telefoonnummer toegevoegd. Telefoonnummers in OSM moeten in een bepaald format (Zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone). Ik heb deze al aangepast. commented 2025-11-29 11:45:41 UTC by Kees 59 ♦35 |
| 175202219 (Comments: 2) | bba367ghd (Discussed changesets: 6) | Jak przebiega ogrodzenie? obecnie jest wrysowane przez budynek PSB razem z obszarem przemysłowym i handlu commented 2025-11-29 11:44:35 UTC by Bartek444 ♦32 |
| 175271641 (Comments: 1) | Vinber (Discussed changesets: 17) | l'url dans le commentaire est une erreur de mes gros doigts c'est la note Note 500446 que je voulais écrire commented 2025-11-29 11:35:54 UTC by Vinber ♦817 |
| 122943638 (Comments: 1) | Le_Viv_33 (Discussed changesets: 22) | salut, je suis moyen convaincu pour des landuse=residential comme cela https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785338572#map=19/44.882788/-0.659593 je ne sais pas quoi en faire non plus, place=neighborhood ? mais landuse=residential me semble &ec... commented 2025-11-29 11:31:45 UTC by Vinber ♦817 |
| 175262093 (Comments: 1) | tjmsy (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMapに情報を追加してくださりありがとうございます。特に航空写真では見えない道は現地調査が必要なため、貴重な変更セットだと思います。 道以外が変更オブジェクト一... commented 2025-11-29 11:30:22 UTC by kudomenagi ♦3 |
| 163490802 (Comments: 2) | ThomasA (Discussed changesets: 24) | Min misforståelse skyldes vist, at jeg har brugt prædeinitioner i JOSM, som kun ser ud til at have en for 'amenity=charging_station' og ikke for 'man_made=charge_point'. Det laver jeg lige om. Tak for præciser... commented 2025-11-29 11:14:50 UTC by ThomasA ♦24 |
| 163490500 (Comments: 2) | ThomasA (Discussed changesets: 24) | Beklager at jeg ikke har svaret på kommentaren før nu. Jeg ser, at det vist er blevet tagget bedre i mellemtiden. Min misforståelse er vist kommet af, at jeg har brugt prdefinitioner i JOSM, og det ser ud til, at den kun har en ... commented 2025-11-29 11:12:45 UTC by ThomasA ♦24 |
| 175268457 (Comments: 1) | germanlion67osm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi germanlion67osm, nocheinmal - bei einem Parkplatz mit eigener Zufahrt wird street_side als Wert für parking nicht verwendet, sondern surface. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side#Wann_parking=street_side_nicht_... commented 2025-11-29 11:01:20 UTC by tux67 ♦1,998 |
| 175165707 (Comments: 2) | KacperL55 (Discussed changesets: 1) | połączyłeś ścieżkę z ganiąc dzielnic https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087412914 commented 2025-11-29 10:55:56 UTC by Bartek444 ♦32 |
| 174866574 (Comments: 1) | ViriatoLusitano (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi, wow, I never imagined this unusual situation could happen. My apologies, I’ll take note. commented 2025-11-29 10:53:28 UTC by aTarom ♦847 |
| 175270069 (Comments: 1) | kamilbogacki (Discussed changesets: 20) | Obszar edycji jest tak duży, bo teren wieży był częścią rozległego landuse=residential. commented 2025-11-29 10:49:16 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦27 |
| 175228196 (Comments: 1) | Bustycat (Discussed changesets: 12) | 寫在自己編輯摘要是沒用的，要去對方的去留言才行 commented 2025-11-29 10:48:40 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 167153563 (Comments: 2) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Super, dakujem commented 2025-11-29 10:45:23 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 159660633 (Comments: 1) | Heroly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Heroly, regarding this changeset, I drove along Bernera Road today, but I could only see a shared path on the western side of the road. Have you seen some evidence of a shared path on the eastern side too? If not, perhaps its just a footpath? |
| 175224880 (Comments: 2) | MacDony (Discussed changesets: 35) | Ok, merci et désolé Bonne journée Denis commented 2025-11-29 10:40:53 UTC by MacDony ♦29 |
| 175260891 (Comments: 1) | Lorexx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, You have tagged the following: currency:XBT=yes Which states, Bitcoin accepted. and payment:lightning=no payment:lightning_contactless=no payment:onchain=no Which states, Bitcoin NOT accepted. Please... commented 2025-11-29 10:34:18 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
| 175245643 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 38) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2025-11-29 10:29:09 UTC by StC ♦377 |
| 175229096 (Comments: 1) | Jackal (Discussed changesets: 10) | на съезде с Дмитровки на внутренний МКАД нет стационарной камеры. Машины ЦОДД мы не наносим commented 2025-11-29 10:19:53 UTC by literan ♦6,885 |
| 175256090 (Comments: 2) | LinuxLynx (Discussed changesets: 1) | а, сорри, промахнулся. Вы как раз все правильно сделали (только фиксми надо убрать) commented 2025-11-29 10:15:45 UTC by literan ♦6,885 |
| 175250514 (Comments: 5) | TheWhistleGang (Discussed changesets: 3) | Right. You can either go to c.osm.org and find the North American or US sub groups or, if you use slack, go to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Slack_workspaces to find the US group. Have a nice weekend commented 2025-11-29 10:14:50 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
| 175268496 (Comments: 2) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 35) | reverted, done something wrong https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175268545 commented 2025-11-29 09:57:28 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦138 |
| 174924708 (Comments: 1) | MaxR_6429 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Bonjour, Je vois que vous travaillez sur la ligne de bus Bus 144 : Rueil Malmaison RER → La Défense : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3307634 Un bon moyen visuel de controler les lignes de bus c'est GEOFABRIK OSM Inspect... commented 2025-11-29 09:51:35 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 150190112 (Comments: 3) | Wild Spike (Discussed changesets: 8) | 1) not sure can we copy from that map 2) what 1918 means on that map? commented 2025-11-29 09:48:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175267010 (Comments: 1) | purist787 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-29 09:47:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
 | 175093034 (Comments: 1) | mdelatorre (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, this area got a strange 'clave_oficina' tag - could you check that? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12952893 commented 2025-11-29 09:45:29 UTC by mueschel ♦6,739 |
| 175099017 (Comments: 1) | tintou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Un bon moyen de vérifier la continuité des lignes de bus c'est GEOFABRIK OSM Inpector avec le lien suivant: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.30812&lat=48.90224&zoom=15&basel... commented 2025-11-29 09:39:11 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 156621913 (Comments: 1) | birdupster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Writing the name of buildings in OSM as “Tribunal da Figueira da Foz (Courthouse)” is a clear mistake. First, “Courthouse” is purely descriptive, and OSM does not accept descriptive terms in the name field — the descript... commented 2025-11-29 09:34:30 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦205 |
| 175189073 (Comments: 2) | NaniGunja (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSM... commented 2025-11-29 09:33:31 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175188388 (Comments: 1) | BhuvanaVilashitha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175267904#map=19/17.025713/81.7755... commented 2025-11-29 09:31:27 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
 | 175228017 (Comments: 4) | JFL-75 (Discussed changesets: 8) | OK got it . I am very sorry , the spelling mistake has been fixed. Regards and thanks for the alert. commented 2025-11-29 09:29:51 UTC by JFL-75 ♦5 |
| 175188869 (Comments: 1) | Likhitha09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175267585#map=16/16.76628/80.28681... commented 2025-11-29 09:26:15 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 160298725 (Comments: 5) | Константин Гам (Discussed changesets: 301) | Создавайте. Частная интерпретация того, что написано в вики пока у вас, о чём вам писал не только я. commented 2025-11-29 09:25:37 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,183 |
| 175239095 (Comments: 1) | Oestermalm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Oestermalm Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du beim Restaurant Frohsinn bei den öffnungszeiten am Sonntag "Su Ruhetag" getaggt hast. Da dies kein offzieller tag ist gemäss https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_... commented 2025-11-29 09:18:45 UTC by North66 ♦6 |
| 175188989 (Comments: 1) | Pavaniraj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Use JOSM for more productive mapping --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSM... commented 2025-11-29 09:08:33 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175244824 (Comments: 1) | rumixist (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! Please check my correction of https://www.osm.org/way/802417454, https://www.osm.org/way/802417455. Are these the correct names? commented 2025-11-29 09:01:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175189141 (Comments: 1) | Guggilapu Pravalika (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). JOSM is a good tool to map buildings as it can make it into perfect rectangles. Focus on s... commented 2025-11-29 08:59:33 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175189233 (Comments: 1) | Surya Praneetha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2025-11-29 08:57:08 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175222287 (Comments: 1) | Pavaniraj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2025-11-29 08:56:17 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175246736 (Comments: 1) | Govindharajulu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). There is no need to delete the branch roads, though they appear to be on paved. Join Tele... commented 2025-11-29 08:55:23 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175233783 (Comments: 1) | Schultewellness (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have reverted your entry. commented 2025-11-29 08:52:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175241699 (Comments: 1) | Parkwood Dental East (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. ou business is not the street. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-11-29 08:47:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175255429 (Comments: 1) | Crown Gold Exchange La Habra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You forgot the Wednesday on the key opening_hours. And your website have other values! commented 2025-11-29 08:38:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 174556023 (Comments: 3) | Christoph Veit (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich habe den Matznerwald westlich der L11 wiederhergestellt, nachdem östlich davon im Gemeindegebiet von Ebenthal schon neue Wälder mit eigenem Namen angelegt wurden. Dort habe ich den restlichen Wald außerhalb von Ebenthal als n... commented 2025-11-29 08:35:14 UTC by Luzandro ♦950 |
| 175139648 (Comments: 1) | Breezy50505 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this seems like tagging for the renderer. Is this actually water, or is it meant to just be a wetland? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175139648 commented 2025-11-29 08:29:49 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,437 |
| 172483753 (Comments: 2) | Edoardo Lacchini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Edoardo, this error still exists, can I get your feedback here? Guido commented 2025-11-29 08:22:29 UTC by gscholz ♦2,805 |
| 175213208 (Comments: 4) | CharliePlett (Discussed changesets: 23) | That all sounds reasonable. Thanks! commented 2025-11-29 08:18:50 UTC by mueschel ♦6,739 |
| 171696969 (Comments: 4) | Cortix (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ciao a tutti, posso suggerire una strada che secondo me è la migliore per OpenStreetMap? @Cortix: secondo me il modo più pulito e trasparente per ripristinare è fare un revert del tuo changeset originale, sempre che questo... commented 2025-11-29 08:14:29 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦113 |
| 175258860 (Comments: 1) | Krzysztof Rodak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Skąd się wzięła ta nazwa ulicy? Ani TERYT ani EMUiA nie wykazują takiej nazwy. commented 2025-11-29 07:57:29 UTC by Maplev ♦12 |
| 175265097 (Comments: 1) | Wynajem toalet przenośnych Bielsko Biała - wynajem toalet na budowę - na imprezę - na działkę - WC KRECIK (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-29 07:41:16 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175264969 (Comments: 1) | DawidIzydor (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-29 07:41:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175265031 (Comments: 1) | DawidIzydor (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-11-29 07:41:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175263178 (Comments: 1) | grindvis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-29 07:35:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 108589355 (Comments: 1) | Idiotech (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147372404/history/8 est-ce qu'il y a une différence entre "vieux goudron" et "asphalté, qualité moyenne" ? commented 2025-11-29 07:31:44 UTC by frosm ♦1,148 |
| 175264863 (Comments: 1) | Wynajem toalet przenośnych Bielsko Biała - wynajem toalet na budowę - na imprezę - na działkę - WC KRECIK (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-29 07:31:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175264782 (Comments: 1) | DawidIzydor (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinn... commented 2025-11-29 07:20:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175229541 (Comments: 1) | Museum Ovartaci (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, adresser i OSM tilføjes automatisk fra 'Danmarks Adresser', hjemmelavede adressepunkter accepteres ikke. Undlad venligst at tagge POI'er med adresser. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser commented 2025-11-29 07:13:07 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,728 |
| 172918134 (Comments: 3) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 9) | I looked at Bing Streetside street-level imagery of this location and saw that the no left-turn restriction is for certain hours on school days only. You could've tagged the turn restriction relation as "restriction:conditional=no_left_turn... commented 2025-11-29 07:10:19 UTC by Frank Peng ♦42 |
| 175252089 (Comments: 3) | FILszew (Discussed changesets: 6) | wycofanie zmiany zbanowanego konta, dodatkowo edycja wykonana bez wymaganej dyskusji, na podstawie Google Maps https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175264568 commented 2025-11-29 07:07:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175264524 (Comments: 1) | Zatigem (Discussed changesets: 4) | source: verified on the field commented 2025-11-29 07:07:29 UTC by Zatigem ♦35 |
| 175240706 (Comments: 1) | qizil (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted commented 2025-11-29 07:05:02 UTC by elsy1 ♦198 |
| 175206413 (Comments: 1) | FILszew (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264650747/history change was bogus AND not discussed degrading highway=primary access to motorway to highway=secondary makes no sense, and requires discussion on forum commented 2025-11-29 07:04:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175235953 (Comments: 2) | ayturkaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted vandal edit commented 2025-11-29 07:02:55 UTC by elsy1 ♦198 |
| 175241510 (Comments: 1) | zeynal935 (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted commented 2025-11-29 07:01:34 UTC by elsy1 ♦198 |
| 175241533 (Comments: 1) | zeynal935 (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted commented 2025-11-29 07:01:28 UTC by elsy1 ♦198 |
| 175215320 (Comments: 2) | BG74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, you dragged the AED and joined it to the road footpath junction. I've repositioned it. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-11-29 07:01:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,998 |
| 175241655 (Comments: 1) | zeynal935 (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted vandal edit commented 2025-11-29 07:00:00 UTC by elsy1 ♦198 |
| 175186250 (Comments: 1) | m_p_13 (Discussed changesets: 153) | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF8JFUnTdF4 commented 2025-11-29 06:48:46 UTC by MaciekMma ♦70 |
| 174866226 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 9) | Or maybe you were meant to tag this road as a foot path or something else? commented 2025-11-29 05:59:59 UTC by Frank Peng ♦42 |
| 174860743 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 9) | Can you explain why you tagged a city (or town) boundary line as a road in this changeset? I do not see a road lining the city boundary line in the aerial imagery. Are you trying to map for the renderer? If so, then please note that it is not good pr... commented 2025-11-29 05:46:48 UTC by Frank Peng ♦42 |
 | 175235317 (Comments: 1) | LakeTorrens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hmm... this highway isn't separated by any barrier between the roundabout on the left and the intersection of "circunvalación" and "del ejercito" avenues... commented 2025-11-29 05:40:25 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,610 |
| 175070230 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello TransAct-AS, can you explain why you tagged Way 845861056 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845861056) as an unclassified road again? I talked to you about this (See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174652113). You also tagged a section... commented 2025-11-29 05:08:53 UTC by Frank Peng ♦42 |
| 175262304 (Comments: 1) | Starfall (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please ignore the change log note; the app saved my previous edit note. What was actually changed was parking lot info as in total capacity numbers and a disabled parking spot count. commented 2025-11-29 04:58:46 UTC by Starfall ♦2 |
| 175193142 (Comments: 1) | Nighto (Discussed changesets: 16) | Oi, Não entendi por que você está usando chave alt_name_1 ao invés de usar múltiplos nomes separados por ponto e vírgula no alt_name. De onde veio essa regra? É algo do BR? commented 2025-11-29 04:17:02 UTC by Raquel Dezidério Souto ♦17 |
| 173655353 (Comments: 5) | CheeseSplatter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Apologies to all for confusion and workloads created. Will ask when in doubt going forward. Bike Lanes: I didn't add bike lanes where there weren't any, although perhaps I added different types, Shelbourne St. in Saanich has had substant... commented 2025-11-29 03:49:09 UTC by CheeseSplatter ♦1 |
| 175084659 (Comments: 1) | Sequoia626 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2025-11-29 03:34:05 UTC by jmarchon ♦436 |
| 175241111 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Please also take more care with your positioning. Here, you have positioned a "pole" in the middle of the traffic lane! commented 2025-11-29 03:20:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175257591 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hello Auinflicik24. Please note that mounts etc should all be lower-case e.g. pole not Pole. Could you please correct them? Thanks! Graeme Fitzpatrick \t\t\t\t\t\t Moderator \t\t OSMF Data Working Group commented 2025-11-29 03:15:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175260644 (Comments: 1) | 💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Please provide supporting information that the speed limit on this light rail line is 55mph --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175260644 commented 2025-11-29 02:32:42 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175260724 (Comments: 1) | 💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Please provide supporting information that the speed limit of these subway lines is 55mph --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175260724 commented 2025-11-29 02:32:10 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175249171 (Comments: 1) | wbragg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was about to add this one today... Thanks commented 2025-11-29 02:28:41 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦133 |
| 175180713 (Comments: 1) | CivicAudit (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, osmi picks up these errors for you to correct https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=130.84876&lat=-12.42304&zoom=14 commented 2025-11-29 02:26:55 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 86937588 (Comments: 2) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 170) | Fixed a few so far: road alignments need a lot of tidying in this area. Will do rest in a sensible editor commented 2025-11-29 02:10:41 UTC by SK53 ♦865 |
| 175247739 (Comments: 1) | tjgraley1981 (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454481972, et al When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outline... commented 2025-11-29 01:23:46 UTC by b-jazz ♦762 |
| 174995132 (Comments: 2) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174995059 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174995073 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174995082 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174995089 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174995093 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174799780 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174799790 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174799730 (Comments: 2) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174799768 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904 commented 2025-11-29 01:20:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| X | 175251929 (Comments: 1) | Panoramamudak (Discussed changesets: 2) | A node in Greenland is a mistake? http://osm.org/node/13339108804 By the way, this is not the first such case. Please tell me, have you ever opened a map of Greenland? Or do you have no idea why the dot ended up there? There may be a b... commented 2025-11-29 01:00:45 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,183 |
| 175140282 (Comments: 1) | rshmd (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259594 commented 2025-11-29 00:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175140248 (Comments: 1) | rshmd (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259594 commented 2025-11-29 00:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175140229 (Comments: 1) | rshmd (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259594 commented 2025-11-29 00:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174847936 (Comments: 1) | Christina Nimblett (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. A bit of feedback: There's no need to add "*=unknown" tags - the absence of the tag is considered equivalent to "*=unknown". I've removed these in https://www.o... commented 2025-11-29 00:55:55 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦117 |
| 175216581 (Comments: 2) | Lou X A (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for asking. It is a private road that is specifically marked no trespassing and guests only. commented 2025-11-29 00:52:20 UTC by Lou X A ♦1 |
| 175259360 (Comments: 1) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 54) | Because of a JOSM bug, this changeset was uploaded with the same changeset comment as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175258261. Apologies. The actual comment for this changeset should be: "Update locations and Mapillary tags on b... commented 2025-11-29 00:44:31 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦117 |
| 175196505 (Comments: 4) | yetzt (Discussed changesets: 9) | also baklava containing milk. commented 2025-11-29 00:31:23 UTC by yetzt ♦9 |
| 175228835 (Comments: 1) | 漣澪靈 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 您好，之前给您留言过了，请问您收到了吗？已经消失的村庄似乎不建议在 OSM 添加的。 （不是针对这条更改） commented 2025-11-29 00:27:00 UTC by hahae ♦11 |
| 175239387 (Comments: 2) | yetzt (Discussed changesets: 9) | indeed. thanks for catching the oversight. commented 2025-11-29 00:10:29 UTC by yetzt ♦9 |
| 175146752 (Comments: 3) | Autopistero20502020 (Discussed changesets: 36) | @Carlos, de nada. Ahora se permite ver el nuevo video que salieron en la nota de prensa del Ministerio de Transportes y Movilidad Sostenible que puedes aclarar el asunto de los accesos y la vía de servicio (esta en un enlace de Multimedia, al ... commented 2025-11-28 23:59:03 UTC by Autopistero20502020 ♦32 |
| 175113708 (Comments: 1) | Rogerb2640 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Edits look good! Thank you for adding this information! And welcome to OSM! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175113708 commented 2025-11-28 23:43:56 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175117521 (Comments: 1) | earlydawes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks good! Just for future reference if you visit a site to confirm info you can list that as "survey" in the sources section for the changeset which is more standardized on OSM even though people will 100% know what "site visit"... commented 2025-11-28 23:35:49 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175119944 (Comments: 1) | Mattroberts199 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks mostly good! Thank you for mapping some addresses in the new development! Only thing I noticed was construction=footway being changed to construction=detatched which isn't a documented tag for a highway=construction way. What was th... commented 2025-11-28 23:31:50 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175258261 (Comments: 1) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 54) | Thank you!! commented 2025-11-28 23:31:12 UTC by watmildon ♦259 |
| 175256976 (Comments: 1) | Cs137 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I changed the node instead of adding a new one, which I should not have done. Thus, this changeset should be removed. commented 2025-11-28 23:24:01 UTC by Cs137 ♦2 |
| 175197375 (Comments: 1) | ThePigeonCompany15 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175258121 commented 2025-11-28 23:16:36 UTC by kitsee ♦115 |
| 175239873 (Comments: 1) | beza208 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Looks good aside from this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256346261 It seems to have gotten smaller and less accurate to the full shape of the building. --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-11-28 23:16:32 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175245229 (Comments: 2) | santi8ago8 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh also when mapping buildings in iD editor, you can use the "q" key to square them up. commented 2025-11-28 23:12:14 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175205782 (Comments: 3) | PerrotinLondon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cool cool, I've deleted the old area at the moment as now that there's a POI it should mean you're searchable on all the OSM based map applications. You can always upgrade to an area again in the future. From here I'd recom... commented 2025-11-28 23:01:28 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175152632 (Comments: 1) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 54) | het is deels gekapt... zou dit nog aangepast moeten worden? https://bosplus.be/nieuws/belangrijke-overwinning-voor-stedelijke-natuur-in-gent/ https://bosplus.be/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/GetImage-4.jpg commented 2025-11-28 23:00:39 UTC by Joske1020 ♦15 |
| 66131019 (Comments: 1) | MartorCZ (Discussed changesets: 21) | Zdravim, podla webstranky skola je len na 2.poschodi, nezabera celu budovu. A tiez zmenou na building=school (pritom to vyzera ako obytny dom, ziadna skola), skolu nevyrobite. Chyba Vam amenity=school. Opravil som. commented 2025-11-28 22:58:12 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 175257393 (Comments: 1) | ftrebien (Discussed changesets: 40) | Datas das imagens: 2025-01-01, 2025-02-10, 2025-02-25, 2025-03-14, 2025-04-28, 2025-05-13, 2025-06-10, 2025-06-25, 2025-07-10, 2025-08-21, 2025-09-23, 2025-10-08, 2025-10-23, 2025-11-19. Método: filtro threshold no GIMP ajustado manualmente pa... commented 2025-11-28 22:52:30 UTC by ftrebien ♦175 |
| 175238429 (Comments: 4) | beza208 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Looks like there is still a tree node there so I suspect you just ended up deleting a duplicate node on further inspection. Whatever the case the map is currently correct so no more action needed. TYSM for your reply and for improving the map! commented 2025-11-28 22:46:21 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175175036 (Comments: 4) | Mrs Jacqueline Lamberty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ty for the assistance Cebderby! Looks all good now! And thank you for the detailed response Mrs Jacqueline Lamberty! Thank you for helping to improve the map! commented 2025-11-28 22:38:33 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175231066 (Comments: 2) | mahoutsukai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the heads-up! The next time I'll create a new node instead of moving a node around. I don't understand the comment "on the CoLab node the address is still the old one". When I look at the node (https:... commented 2025-11-28 22:35:46 UTC by mahoutsukai ♦1 |
 | 166358931 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 122) | Bartly MRT station is missing in Relation: MRT Circle Line (HarbourFront --> Marina Bay) (7981668). It is fully operational and was present before. I am sorry. I don't know how to edit relation. commented 2025-11-28 22:35:35 UTC by hoizan ♦4 |
| 174826705 (Comments: 2) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 308) | I meant to write a diary post about this decision, but I haven't gotten round to it. I mentioned it in one of my last videos, but of course I cannot expect you to watch all of these on the odd chance that I will explain myself. commented 2025-11-28 22:26:01 UTC by b-unicycling ♦256 |
| 167782174 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 122) | Found Paya Lebar MRT is missing in MRT East-West Line (Tuas Link → Pasir Ris) (445764), v77. In v56, it had Paya Lebar MRT, and it had 60 members. Sorry. I do not know how to edit relations. commented 2025-11-28 22:25:33 UTC by hoizan ♦4 |
| 174582209 (Comments: 5) | Paul Fisher (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the follow-up. To answer your question about my objection: my point is simply that the Wiki’s current guidance treats two different posted names as separate directional names, not as “multiple values of name=*.” The name:... commented 2025-11-28 22:25:01 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦128 |
| 174621118 (Comments: 4) | Calasanz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Teniendo en cuenta que la recopilación toponímica la ha realizado gente de Maella, tal y como lo explica la Asociación Cultural Guirigall Maellano en el mapa del municipio que publicó (https://lenguasdearagon.org/wp-conten... commented 2025-11-28 22:23:01 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,710 |
| 175255709 (Comments: 1) | BertramEskeLund (Discussed changesets: 4) | 'motorvej' staves med 'o' ikke 'e' commented 2025-11-28 21:49:03 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,728 |
| 131240864 (Comments: 3) | jmsbert (Discussed changesets: 65) | Ah, alles klar, danke, das passt es so. commented 2025-11-28 21:34:57 UTC by chris66 ♦422 |
| 136146837 (Comments: 2) | m86 (Discussed changesets: 33) | I don't really know exactly what this shop sells - it's been a while, and it was probably just added off of my Mapillary captures of this area. shop=esoteric would probably work fine here, however commented 2025-11-28 21:28:41 UTC by m86 ♦20 |
| 165403651 (Comments: 1) | GullibleMappazo (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello. Node 10955917472 seem to have some corrupted tag values. Please take a look at that. commented 2025-11-28 20:58:02 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175142612 (Comments: 6) | Uncle181 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Pour le name= il vaut mieux se fier à ce qui est visible de l'extérieur et facilement vérifiable. Après s'ils ont des appellations spécifiques, c'est ce qui apparait avec les tags branch= asssoci&eacu... commented 2025-11-28 20:54:47 UTC by GilB ♦38 |
| 175241800 (Comments: 2) | Next Park (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lokalizacja niezgodna z podanym adresem. Mieści tu się skądinąd firma zarządzająca parkingami NextPark, ale ma ona inną nazwę. Zestaw zmian zostanie wycofany. commented 2025-11-28 20:39:01 UTC by Rogoyski ♦241 |
| 175080842 (Comments: 4) | Grzegorz_Kujawa (Discussed changesets: 23) | Obejrzałem region - podniósłbym sąsiednie drogi na unclassified - np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33023715 - bo Zamojska jest już unclassified. I analogicznie drogi na południu. commented 2025-11-28 20:32:06 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,325 |
| 175240994 (Comments: 2) | Usługi Pogrzebowe Mirosław Krawczuk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lokalizacja punktu nie odpowiada podanemu adresowi. Edycja zostanie wycofana. commented 2025-11-28 20:26:27 UTC by Rogoyski ♦241 |
| X | 175152611 (Comments: 2) | HT2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't understand what you mean. Can you explain further? commented 2025-11-28 20:24:55 UTC by HT2 ♦1 |
 | 175253277 (Comments: 1) | Jesús Telles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 627 of your last 741 changes were deletions. This is quite... commented 2025-11-28 20:16:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175253294 (Comments: 1) | Obojzivelnik (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Obojzivelnik, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 building(s) Could you please confirm i... commented 2025-11-28 20:10:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 175253134 (Comments: 1) | Obojzivelnik (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Obojzivelnik, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 highway(s) Could you please confirm if ... commented 2025-11-28 20:03:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,491 |
| 158020465 (Comments: 1) | Антон-1983 (Discussed changesets: 53) | Привет! Есть возможность узнать УНП/Юр. лицо, а ещё лучше номер в торговом реесте объекта? Есть предположение, что это ЧТУП "Дашут... commented 2025-11-28 20:03:29 UTC by Vodevil_Mark ♦18 |
| 170907016 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 203) | Flock camera 13093803152 is positioned wrong and the result is that it is duplicating the real camera 13021453698 commented 2025-11-28 20:01:00 UTC by AutumnFoughtEm ♦2 |
| 175044794 (Comments: 3) | Grzegorz_Kujawa (Discussed changesets: 23) | Nie można wnioskować o moście na podstawie szerokości drogi i wielkości strumienia. Z GSV bardziej wygląda na most, choć oczywiście może to też być przepust. Na podstawie ISOK obstawiałbym, że to most, ale to źródło nie ... commented 2025-11-28 19:50:30 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,325 |
 | 155542768 (Comments: 3) | Harel M (Discussed changesets: 8) | Split done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175252453 commented 2025-11-28 19:36:37 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦676 |
| 173361285 (Comments: 2) | bigopenmac (Discussed changesets: 11) | Спасибо, что напомнил! В эвридуре не дает редактировать имя тэга, поэтому так пометил, а потом забыл. Уже исправил. commented 2025-11-28 19:07:17 UTC by bigopenmac ♦69 |
| 169582168 (Comments: 8) | Grzegorz_Kujawa (Discussed changesets: 23) | Twój opis oznakowania faktycznie odpowiada rzeczywistości. Nie ma wiec podstaw do oznaczenia omawianego odcinka jako strefy zamieszkania. W takiej jednak sytuacji, jeśli tu jest nieruchomy słupek, uznałem za stosowne oznaczyć jako ... commented 2025-11-28 18:54:25 UTC by Rogoyski ♦241 |
| 171670569 (Comments: 2) | Karthoo (Discussed changesets: 81) | Hallo, der Bürgersteig endet wirklich dort. Mit Bau der Rad- und Fussbrücke etwas nordwestlich wurde der Bürgersteig dort gesperrt. Kannst du gerne auch bei Mapillary nachsehen. Grüße, Karthoo/Leon commented 2025-11-28 18:52:51 UTC by Karthoo ♦218 |
| 175205069 (Comments: 2) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 160) | You are welcome. Just one thing: in the future, please avoid commenting on changesets directly, when there is nothing *wrong* about them. This is because OSM has statistics of mappers who got changeset comments, and comments are implici... commented 2025-11-28 18:47:41 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,654 |
| 175079586 (Comments: 1) | FILszew (Discussed changesets: 6) | jak sama edycja wspomina, ignoruje ona oznakowanie w terenie, wycofuje więc 175079586 jak było już tłumaczone setki razy: tabliczki w terenie są dla OSM istotniejsze niż oficjalne dokumenty https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/... commented 2025-11-28 18:46:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175094963 (Comments: 2) | anszejek (Discussed changesets: 6) | Skoro nie potrafisz / nie chcesz poprawić swoich błędów - zmiany wycofuję https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175250711 commented 2025-11-28 18:44:52 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175150978 (Comments: 2) | anszejek (Discussed changesets: 6) | Skoro nie potrafisz / nie chcesz poprawić swoich błędów - zmiany wycofuję https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175250711 commented 2025-11-28 18:44:52 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175218282 (Comments: 2) | Rogoyski (Discussed changesets: 64) | Nazwa ulicy naprawiona. commented 2025-11-28 18:40:32 UTC by Rogoyski ♦241 |
| 74698563 (Comments: 1) | dufekin (Discussed changesets: 73) | Strips of unmaintained grass are not a park. commented 2025-11-28 18:40:31 UTC by Kovirii ♦39 |
| 175235294 (Comments: 1) | Ræume (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ja richtig, die Nennweite gehört in fire_hydrant:diameter Viele Grüße commented 2025-11-28 18:31:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,140 |
| 174933403 (Comments: 5) | likeToTravel (Discussed changesets: 4) | For the building, you write the name Anza in mixed upper and lower case letters. For the bike path, you use only capital letters (“ANZA AV”). I would like to know the reason why you write the name differently for the bike path (this is of... commented 2025-11-28 18:26:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175244797 (Comments: 1) | kartler175 (Discussed changesets: 137) | Moin, die kaputten PLZ-Relationen sind mir durchgerutscht, aber warum wurden auch die Tags der Grenzlinien in Achim entfernt? commented 2025-11-28 18:11:54 UTC by mgerken ♦77 |
| 7438013 (Comments: 2) | nikusha (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi I don't know. I was just voluntarily making import of data prepared by Jump Start Georgia (You can see this info in source field). commented 2025-11-28 17:59:52 UTC by nikusha ♦8 |
| 174335750 (Comments: 1) | TheChemist431 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Warum hast Du die Straßen unbenutzbar gemacht (Straße im Bau)? Ich habe es geändert, weil dort ja Gebäude sind, die bestimmt erreichbar sind. Temporäre Baustellen tragen wir nicht ein. Vermutlich werden die Straßen er... commented 2025-11-28 17:57:07 UTC by Scout Jens ♦287 |
| 160528497 (Comments: 1) | Aluminum0173 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Ciao Aluminium, la Polizia Municipale non è militare commented 2025-11-28 17:47:09 UTC by totera ♦310 |
| X | 175220474 (Comments: 3) | likeToTravel (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello likeToTravel, Please try and add descriptive changeset comments before you submit a changeset. This helps others to review your changeset and see how you've been contributing. From reading your comment on this changset, I have no id... commented 2025-11-28 17:36:32 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦8 |
| 175231480 (Comments: 2) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 404) | By changing the address notation, you are only deceiving youselves. You can also ignore an error message; that is no reason to switch to another error, which I have criticized here. I cannot comply with the request, so I will continue to change the i... commented 2025-11-28 17:30:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175247386 (Comments: 1) | wild_stride (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.come-on.de/lennetal/werdohl/wandern-in-werdohl-wege-sollen-neu-geordnet-werden-90204220.html commented 2025-11-28 17:14:22 UTC by wild_stride ♦1 |
| 174924958 (Comments: 3) | OPerivar (Discussed changesets: 9) | Vielen Dank & LG .. commented 2025-11-28 17:05:30 UTC by sundew ♦76 |
| 175187853 (Comments: 2) | Szymi2673 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Kolego, odpiszesz czy nie? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454100035 Przepust też zepsułeś? commented 2025-11-28 16:58:22 UTC by Szymson ♦439 |
| 175209705 (Comments: 2) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 139) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039132623 The steps are still there https://api.panoramax.xyz/#pic=184ea516-c722-4793-9672-8a4aa91496fc&focus=pic also in 2025-01 image (at top, click on three dots, then on lamp to increase ... commented 2025-11-28 16:37:01 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦701 |
 | 169771133 (Comments: 1) | Mafe Ramirez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Mafe Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. André... commented 2025-11-28 16:29:24 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771116 (Comments: 1) | Sthefanya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Sthefanya Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&e... commented 2025-11-28 16:29:14 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771112 (Comments: 1) | Mariana pino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Mariana Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&eac... commented 2025-11-28 16:29:04 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771107 (Comments: 1) | Estefany Pineda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Estefany Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&ea... commented 2025-11-28 16:27:35 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771103 (Comments: 1) | Leslie Daniela Bernal Cañola (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Leslie Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&eacu... commented 2025-11-28 16:27:26 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771091 (Comments: 1) | Sara Acosta Noreña (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Sara Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. André... commented 2025-11-28 16:27:18 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771086 (Comments: 1) | Ospinat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Ospinat Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&eac... commented 2025-11-28 16:27:11 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771084 (Comments: 1) | Mariana Quintero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Mariana Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&eac... commented 2025-11-28 16:27:01 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771088 (Comments: 1) | Sofi Gonzalez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Sofi Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. André... commented 2025-11-28 16:26:56 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771089 (Comments: 1) | Karen Jimenez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Karen Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&eacut... commented 2025-11-28 16:26:49 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771085 (Comments: 1) | Eva Medrano (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Eva Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. André... commented 2025-11-28 16:26:41 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771083 (Comments: 1) | salitoo20 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola salitoo Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&eac... commented 2025-11-28 16:26:29 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771076 (Comments: 1) | Sofia Ardila (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Sofia Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andr&eacut... commented 2025-11-28 16:26:15 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 169771077 (Comments: 1) | Sara Balsero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar? Gracias por la info. Andrés G... commented 2025-11-28 16:26:09 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 175071215 (Comments: 3) | Cebderby (Discussed changesets: 45) | That is a dirty accusation. I am not even aware of any database which provides such data. Is there a procedure which deals with bullying, harassment and unwarranted vandalism within the OSM community? I feel like I am the subject of a person... commented 2025-11-28 16:25:03 UTC by UtterClutter ♦40 |
| 164208705 (Comments: 7) | Đuro Jiří (Discussed changesets: 86) | Dès que j'aurai téléchargé quelques images sur Panoramax, si vous avez besoin d'informations, tant que je me souviendrai de cette route, n'hésitez pas à me contacter.:) commented 2025-11-28 16:09:07 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦324 |
| 175240518 (Comments: 1) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454437728 and, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454437729 are no riding centers. The large one is a riding arena and should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian instead of leisure=horse_riding.... commented 2025-11-28 16:04:58 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦850 |
| 175244364 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 171) | Reverting because of accidental unnecessary changes #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175244788 commented 2025-11-28 16:03:59 UTC by TinPetreković ♦186 |
| 175131688 (Comments: 1) | sotovm (Discussed changesets: 1) | I fixed tagging a bit - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44581221/history commented 2025-11-28 15:56:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 169130187 (Comments: 2) | kitsee (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, I've changed it to shop to shoe_repair as you suggested. shoe_repair is not a perfect description for a cobbler but it does describe their primary business so i'm happy enough with it. commented 2025-11-28 15:53:21 UTC by kitsee ♦115 |
| 175231209 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 404) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name#Date_ranges "When only ranges of years are specified (no month or other details), a single hyphen may be used, such as `old_name:1953-1990 = Ernst-Thälmann-Straße`. When f... commented 2025-11-28 15:48:44 UTC by hoserab ♦210 |
| 175236674 (Comments: 1) | czyszczenielaserowe (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-28 15:43:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175237526 (Comments: 4) | janoPL (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-11-28 15:43:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175234473 (Comments: 1) | HannaRan (Discussed changesets: 3) | 已經有了，重覆添加了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156426257 commented 2025-11-28 15:41:12 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 175234901 (Comments: 1) | HannaRan (Discussed changesets: 3) | 已經有了，重覆添加了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80219144 commented 2025-11-28 15:39:34 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 175084587 (Comments: 6) | Mah (Discussed changesets: 33) | Da sich @Mah weiterhin nicht meldet, das Changeset weitere kleine Probleme hat (z.B. ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19878929 falsch, da das Wenden erlaubt ist, und bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333355958 wurde beim Verschieben `p... commented 2025-11-28 15:38:45 UTC by Jofban ♦14 |
| 174853771 (Comments: 5) | ginzamax (Discussed changesets: 1) | ...ちょっと待って下さい、指摘を受けた交差点以外にも波及的に他の交差点にも同様の変更を行っていることが確認できました。 これは公共交通機関リレーションシップが壊れていな... commented 2025-11-28 15:37:44 UTC by umapjpnic793 ♦33 |
| 171849072 (Comments: 1) | Dani Wi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Dani Desde qué aplicación estabas pidiendo la ruta para llegar a tu casa? commented 2025-11-28 15:32:58 UTC by AngocA ♦215 |
| 163077843 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5066379 commented 2025-11-28 15:24:57 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,782 |
| 175235537 (Comments: 1) | HannaRan (Discussed changesets: 3) | 重覆添加了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9191159989 commented 2025-11-28 15:12:06 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,534 |
| 175199802 (Comments: 4) | loop52 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great, thanks! commented 2025-11-28 15:09:29 UTC by loop52 ♦1 |
| 175230065 (Comments: 1) | Aplica-is (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bon dia, si l'objectiu és afegir un nom local a la Riera de Canet, potser seria millor posar-ho com a loc_name a la via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363573672#map=14/42.02298/2.72981&layers=N . I el punt quilomètric (miles... commented 2025-11-28 14:52:05 UTC by Jo sóc jo ♦4 |
| 7569621 (Comments: 1) | Andro (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1203510991/history has shop = cobbler that was added in this edit shop=cobbler? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=shoe_repair ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=shoe_repair ) or shop=sho... commented 2025-11-28 14:26:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 15649394 (Comments: 1) | michel evens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1672022585/history has shop = funeral that was added in this edit shop=funeral ? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=funeral_directors ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_dire... commented 2025-11-28 14:25:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 151269441 (Comments: 5) | swimdb (Discussed changesets: 49) | What is license of that imported data? Do you plan to ask US community? commented 2025-11-28 14:18:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175235487 (Comments: 1) | aymanzzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted vandal edit #175240746 commented 2025-11-28 14:15:45 UTC by elsy1 ♦198 |
| 175235036 (Comments: 1) | hoseinsayman (Discussed changesets: 1) | vandal edit. reverted #175240596 commented 2025-11-28 14:12:49 UTC by elsy1 ♦198 |
| 152671030 (Comments: 1) | KOLLEPARA R J N P RUTVIK (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676199157 - is it really temple named "Cooperative bank:? commented 2025-11-28 13:58:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 83779609 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 63) | Well, AFAI see the the history records: - CajaSur, until 2010. - CajaSur Banco, 2010-2025. Owned by Kutxabank, but still a brand. - From now on, it will be Kutxabank. No longer an independent brand. Note this last update is quite rece... commented 2025-11-28 13:53:19 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦227 |
| 175238544 (Comments: 3) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 100) | Chouette ! Amuse-toi ! Est-ce que tu peux me laisser celle-ci par contre : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4977190 Il a levé un point intéressant sur le Wiki pour les vo... commented 2025-11-28 13:48:55 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦39 |
| 174980033 (Comments: 2) | Darkpoint (Discussed changesets: 2) | You are correct, fixed in changeset #175239407 commented 2025-11-28 13:45:58 UTC by Darkpoint ♦2 |
| 175195362 (Comments: 3) | crogfoxnova (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cool cool thanks for the clarification! And thank you for improving the map! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175195362 commented 2025-11-28 13:44:47 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175197033 (Comments: 1) | Railwayfan2005 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Loving the detailed improvements to platforms! TYSM for adding this data to the map! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175197033 commented 2025-11-28 13:43:16 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
 | 175144119 (Comments: 1) | Zh9567 (Discussed changesets: 72) | 👍 commented 2025-11-28 13:40:47 UTC by rene78 ♦464 |
| 175229575 (Comments: 3) | Frills (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke.. prima commented 2025-11-28 13:33:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 145080367 (Comments: 1) | novaelezabathea (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11415110882/history has shop = microenterprises that was added in this edit shop=microenterprises ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from... commented 2025-11-28 13:32:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175218240 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Esto se llama "Villa Los Nolitos" y tiene 46 habitantes, asi que se clasifica como place=hamlet commented 2025-11-28 13:29:31 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175238080 (Comments: 2) | Arnoud Motah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tip Je kunt ook een vlak maken met die zelfde tags over het terrein ipv de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-28 13:28:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175218396 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Esto se llama Villa San Felipe, y por la poblacion de 278 habitantes se clasifica como place=village. commented 2025-11-28 13:28:15 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175218421 (Comments: 2) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | y la poblacion de 317 habitantes hace que se clasifique como place=village con los criterios que se usan, commented 2025-11-28 13:26:05 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175218465 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | lo mismo que los otros casos, esto se llama Villa San José, y es una poblacion separada, distinta, independiente, no es "quarter". commented 2025-11-28 13:24:23 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175148432 (Comments: 6) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 119) | przypisujesz mi wady edycji, których nie robiłem, dla mnie EOT commented 2025-11-28 13:24:13 UTC by Mariusz 2M ♦15 |
| 175237002 (Comments: 1) | Samenzachtwaterontharders (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Je hebt het gebouw verwijderd. Bedrijven taggen we bij in OSM op de adresnode. Ik zal wat herstellen. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-28 13:21:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175218516 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | hola. estas confundiendo nombre con clasificacion de la poblacion. aparece como Villa Porvenir al menos desde los censos de mitad del siglo pasado. commented 2025-11-28 13:20:46 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175235771 (Comments: 1) | glennco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback .. Format phone +31 aangepast. construction verwijderd. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-28 13:18:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175078432 (Comments: 2) | james12689 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Great work on the mapping! I noticed the addition of name=James house on the building and another name tag on the service road leading to it. Just a note on tagging convention: The name tag should only be used for a feature's publicly kno... commented 2025-11-28 13:15:54 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175233212 (Comments: 1) | qwert6767 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-28 13:14:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175218546 (Comments: 1) | olita07 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola olita07. Los criterios estan definidos hace años, y segun esos criterios (poblacion > 10000) es place=city commented 2025-11-28 13:12:30 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175077889 (Comments: 1) | james12689 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for adding to the map, though it's usually not advisable to disclose your home address via changeset on OSM. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2025-11-28 13:08:07 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 85505937 (Comments: 1) | Madnes (Discussed changesets: 1) | I can't find any "erotic shop" here. It is just somewhere in the woods at a lake... Why did you add this POI here? commented 2025-11-28 13:05:55 UTC by Moritz-Schmidt ♦2 |
| 144195662 (Comments: 1) | Elijah_C (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772546484/history has maxweight = 2.041166 that was added in this edit this value is unexpectedly long and detailed - is it really correct? commented 2025-11-28 12:41:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 152763147 (Comments: 1) | KOLLEPARA R J N P RUTVIK (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767731109/history has addr:housenumber = building that was added in this edit Are you sure this building has "building" as an address number? commented 2025-11-28 12:41:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 169346486 (Comments: 1) | Shaik_rabiya_basri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330768852/history has addr:housenumber = building that was added in this edit Are you sure this building has "building" as an address number? commented 2025-11-28 12:37:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 168869347 (Comments: 1) | Sai Deekshitha G (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400385237/history has addr:housenumber = building that was added in this edit Are you sure this building has "building" as an address number? commented 2025-11-28 12:37:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 145461014 (Comments: 1) | Munham (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233778751/history has addr:housenumber = building that was added in this edit Are you sure this building has "building" as an address number? commented 2025-11-28 12:37:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 172234239 (Comments: 1) | maclean nyasulu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844162978/history has addr:housenumber = building that was added in this edit Are you sure this building has "building" as an address number? commented 2025-11-28 12:37:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175209718 (Comments: 3) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 13) | First, I am a woman, but you can also call me a squid in reference to Squid Girl, which my avatar comes from. Two, what is the source for an ancient road passing through this area? I am not sure how well Roman Roads are mapped in Greece, and we can&#... commented 2025-11-28 12:20:49 UTC by ika-chan! ♦309 |
| 175232142 (Comments: 1) | eversone (Discussed changesets: 51) | Please don't create duplicates. Edit the existing ones. commented 2025-11-28 12:14:48 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175104773 (Comments: 2) | DominikFehervary (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am going to deleted this feature as there is no physical evidence in any imagery> The tags do not make sense either. commented 2025-11-28 12:06:08 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦17 |
 | 120547174 (Comments: 1) | Arya Tiwari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1057223399/history has addr:housenumber = building that was added in this edit Are you sure this building has "building" as an address number? commented 2025-11-28 12:03:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175229246 (Comments: 1) | gaga15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello gaga15, What do you mean? This road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100744345) was closed? commented 2025-11-28 12:02:50 UTC by empty_child ♦364 |
| 175129863 (Comments: 5) | David Reik (Discussed changesets: 26) | That is just how it is implemented in one map project. You have to look at our OSM documentation, because that is what other map projects will use as a reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmc:symbol "waycolor - Name of ... commented 2025-11-28 11:49:52 UTC by Mashin ♦584 |
| 175207949 (Comments: 1) | Lub18 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. You mapped a building with a gabled roof along the visible roofline. However, the imagery shows a building from an angle, so the roof seems to not have a rectangular form. Just map them as a rectangular building. Check this webpage. |
| 156317669 (Comments: 1) | Decorator1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5071100 ? what you meant by that amenity=2 ? commented 2025-11-28 11:47:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 140857294 (Comments: 3) | Badojo (Discussed changesets: 118) | Great, thank you very much for looking into this! commented 2025-11-28 11:43:16 UTC by JunosL ♦8 |
| 175208453 (Comments: 2) | Lub18 (Discussed changesets: 2) | When you see that a borderline of the residential are crosses buildings, move that line just outside the build area. Best regards --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/cha... commented 2025-11-28 11:40:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175208779 (Comments: 1) | Tristan_cllrd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Follow the roof line precisely, even where a roof recesses or there is an extension. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular ... commented 2025-11-28 11:33:10 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175207780 (Comments: 1) | Lukas DELAGE (Discussed changesets: 3) | Here you connected nodes of buildings to a residential landuse borderline. Move that line to a place where it does not cross buildings. Best regards --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-11-28 11:28:20 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175208554 (Comments: 1) | Lukas DELAGE (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. See my previous comments on a changeset. Another issue. You regularly include the shadow of a building. These are no part of the building ! Best regards --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published usi... commented 2025-11-28 11:24:19 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175208784 (Comments: 1) | Lukas DELAGE (Discussed changesets: 3) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-11-28 11:21:49 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175208089 (Comments: 1) | matheol (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. FYI. Please vi... commented 2025-11-28 11:19:47 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175208787 (Comments: 1) | matheol (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. FYI. Please vi... commented 2025-11-28 11:17:51 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175208144 (Comments: 2) | Esther K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Please do not include a shadow of the building. Reviewed by a... commented 2025-11-28 11:16:28 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175232627 (Comments: 2) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 20) | No worries! It is quite a common mistake. commented 2025-11-28 11:00:31 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦37 |
| 175232980 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 119) | Miałem problemy z połączeniem obydwu revertów. Planowane budynku oznaczamy prefixem planned/proposed, a nie wartością, która go renderuje. Po za tym linia metra M4 jest na razie zapowiedziana, a wszelkie informacje nt. M3 i... commented 2025-11-28 10:59:41 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 175214015 (Comments: 1) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 17) | Merhaba. Otobus hatlarini buraya gecirmeniz harika, ancak mumkunse gelecekte ekleyeceginiz otobus hatlarinin duraklarini hattin "relation"ina otobusun gittigi sirayla ekleyebilir misiniz? OSM verilerini kullanan uygulamalar sirali olmayan o... commented 2025-11-28 10:49:47 UTC by property0029 ♦2 |
| 175230661 (Comments: 4) | Jaymap5432 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yep.. lastig.. we kennen natuurlijk ook oecumenisch Maar als je het niet zeker weet gewoon weglaten. commented 2025-11-28 10:31:34 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175231683 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 366) | Commentaar moet zijn poi verschoven commented 2025-11-28 10:15:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175205830 (Comments: 2) | Iluzjonista (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jak dla mnie jak nie odpisze to do wycofania to będzie commented 2025-11-28 10:08:04 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 98809544 (Comments: 1) | Corneto (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8399218715/history has shop = Libre that was added in this edit shop=Libre ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstree... commented 2025-11-28 10:05:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175217002 (Comments: 3) | Lucas Kosters (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dat is oke... Er zijn meer voorbeelden van dit soort terreinen met niet officieel uitgegeven straatnamen. Die echter wel in gebruik zijn bij iedereen. Het probleem is dat het medemappers triggert. Evt kun je dan een note=... met korte uitl... commented 2025-11-28 09:58:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174542374 (Comments: 1) | MWpg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Assiniboine forest no longer shows up as green on the default (non-editing) view of osm as a result of this. That seems unexpected. commented 2025-11-28 09:56:36 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦53 |
| 173702723 (Comments: 1) | naattkay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вы путаете ограничения доступа для автомобилей и тип дороги. ограничения задаются другими тегами. фактически автомобили сюда проезжают... commented 2025-11-28 09:55:34 UTC by Глеб ♦142 |
| 175213532 (Comments: 1) | pertile (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12343429936. What is the mean of the tag re36 = 683? commented 2025-11-28 09:52:44 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 158001039 (Comments: 3) | cowboyxup (Discussed changesets: 16) | perfekt, vielen Dank commented 2025-11-28 09:47:41 UTC by fs_LT ♦109 |
| 175229900 (Comments: 1) | Mamutinka (Discussed changesets: 98) | Is this bridge open now? It was closed for quite a while commented 2025-11-28 09:44:14 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦811 |
| 175227388 (Comments: 4) | tucnaaaK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Prístavná 10 je celkom inde https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/14440375 commented 2025-11-28 09:39:41 UTC by Dodko ♦1,273 |
| 174820027 (Comments: 1) | Natalya_16 (Discussed changesets: 1) | В название здание не нужно писать адрес (особенно полный). Для этого есть отдельные теги addr:housenumber, addr:street commented 2025-11-28 09:37:23 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,183 |
| 175230281 (Comments: 1) | Itz's (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hanjishart commented 2025-11-28 09:33:44 UTC by Itz's ♦1 |
| 175227173 (Comments: 1) | MaciekMma (Discussed changesets: 16) | jednokierunkowa od listopada 2025 zeby ograniczyc chaos na parkingu wzdluz tej ulicy commented 2025-11-28 09:31:00 UTC by MaciekMma ♦70 |
| 174325020 (Comments: 1) | Korvin1777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-11-28 09:27:21 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,183 |
 | 174776149 (Comments: 1) | Татьяна Антонова (Discussed changesets: 1) | Кажется вы ошиблись перенеся это места так далеко commented 2025-11-28 09:26:40 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,183 |
| 175213599 (Comments: 2) | SoulCover (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wenn du mal wieder vorbeikommst, kannst du bei der Straße nochmal schauen, ob die anderen Werte noch korrekt sind. Z.B. die Straßenmarkierungen - das hatte ich leider nicht gemacht und ich war nur auf der Durchreise. Ich schau mal, das... commented 2025-11-28 09:23:26 UTC by SoulCover ♦2 |
| 175229504 (Comments: 2) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 36) | This wasn't a POI. Apologies, was about to update with cafe name and correct coordinate. commented 2025-11-28 09:20:44 UTC by au-btcmap‑onboarding ♦2 |
| 175206708 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 63) | Cierto, usé el editor Level0 por probar... pero no era tan simple. Gracias. commented 2025-11-28 09:17:34 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦227 |
| 175215576 (Comments: 1) | slavfreak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adresa je vyplnená v budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73352250 netreba ju dávať duplicitne do bodu, aplikácie si ju prevezmú z budovy. commented 2025-11-28 09:11:51 UTC by Dodko ♦1,273 |
| 175228759 (Comments: 1) | 001100N277 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Je zou een opmerking op de kaart van het Kadaster kunnen zetten. https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=156160.54&geometry.y=435782.22&zoomlevel=13.01 Het pad ontbreekt zelfs op de kaart. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-28 09:05:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174914245 (Comments: 6) | NorthOfEnglandMaps (Discussed changesets: 3) | That's not what permissive means. The original tagging was: motor_vehicle = no motor_vehicle:conditional = yes @ (19:00-7:00) which encodes the 7-7 restriction correctly. I will revert for now, but it probably needs further check... commented 2025-11-28 09:04:19 UTC by phodgkin ♦71 |
| 175228705 (Comments: 1) | 001100N277 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag 00 Je zou eens een opmerking op de kaart kunnen zetten dat die naam nooit is opgenomen in de BGT/BAG. Ze zouden het dan (wel of niet )kunnen aanpassen. https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=151163.84&geometry.y=435818.06&... commented 2025-11-28 09:00:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175100345 (Comments: 5) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 166) | Na budynkach nie ma tabliczek adresowych, więc trzeba się opierać na danych z serwisu gminnego i pewnie jak ustaliliście będzie to Bąkowo. Po wizycie w terenie zaktualizowałem POI i teren przy tym centrum handlowym: https://www.opens... commented 2025-11-28 08:57:15 UTC by Marek-M ♦972 |
| 160885152 (Comments: 2) | silversurfer83 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Moin :) Magst du das mit dktue in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160782833 besprechen. Ich hab hier nur Wege verbunden. Cheers commented 2025-11-28 08:50:57 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
| 175217582 (Comments: 2) | Flying Dutch (Discussed changesets: 4) | FD Het wegennet klopt hier ook niet meer. Ik heb een deel van die Panovenweg verwijderd. Dat is een grasveld. Bron OBLIEK Slagboom&Peeters commented 2025-11-28 08:43:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 173737769 (Comments: 2) | KingVik (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thank you, Madi-Red, for your feedback commented 2025-11-28 08:37:20 UTC by KingVik ♦18 |
| 175222555 (Comments: 1) | Enlight2k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! The keys must be entered one per line. commented 2025-11-28 08:34:05 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175225756 (Comments: 2) | Cyril van Dijk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wanneer het de gebouwnaam betreft kan het prima, maar dan de dubbele vermelding op de adresnode beter verwijderen. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-28 08:30:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175208697 (Comments: 1) | Nicole990101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2025-11-28 08:30:07 UTC by rene78 ♦464 |
| 173457843 (Comments: 1) | Kingsley AMANKWE (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hello Kingsley AMANKWE, thank You for your contribution. I corrected all issues related to building and highway intersections within our Africa - Fix Building and Highway Intersection challenge. Make sure that there are no validation errors before da... commented 2025-11-28 08:24:02 UTC by Madi-Red ♦20 |
| 173861446 (Comments: 1) | Iahaia Amisse (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello , thank You for your contribution. I corrected all issues related to building and highway intersections within our Africa - Fix Building and Highway Intersection challenge and restored objects which you removed. Make sure that you do not remove... commented 2025-11-28 08:23:30 UTC by Madi-Red ♦20 |
| 175217558 (Comments: 3) | Flying Dutch (Discussed changesets: 4) | De naam HIC heb ik teruggezet op gebouw Langenberg. Mocht daar de HIC niet meer zitten dan ook de andere tagging aanpassen. Volgens de website zit de HIC nog daar... hospital aangepast naar clinic. Toegangswegen aangebracht en de ingang aa... commented 2025-11-28 08:20:33 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 173177161 (Comments: 1) | This Is The Way (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello This Is The Way, thank You for your contribution in Incorrect Highway Tag value challenge. While reviewing the task I saw that you added incorrect tag - I have corrected the data already (added proper value instead of yes value). Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 08:08:27 UTC by Byenin ♦40 |
| 173156106 (Comments: 1) | jbcharron (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello jbcharron Thank you for mapping! I Removed tunnel=yes tag. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 08:01:19 UTC by Byenin ♦40 |
| 55084436 (Comments: 1) | Yollo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bit of an understatement, because of snow at the saddle I was forced to try and cross it and almost died. There is an signed alternate route that is missing from the map, I'm going to try and guess it, but if anyone has a trace that would... commented 2025-11-28 07:54:24 UTC by a_tragic_hiking_accident ♦1 |
| 175226100 (Comments: 1) | RAL_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | I meant south commented 2025-11-28 07:49:44 UTC by RAL_ ♦1 |
| 175226429 (Comments: 1) | anirud (Discussed changesets: 22) | Na krátkom úseku, ktorý som označil ako access=no, je osadená značka zákaz vjazdu. Na odbočke z cesty 1345 je značka "slepá ulica". Nie je tam fyzická bariéra, iba spomaľovač, al... commented 2025-11-28 07:40:44 UTC by anirud ♦16 |
| 7624937 (Comments: 2) | Gregory Williams (Discussed changesets: 25) | Wow, that was a long time ago. I *think* that it came from me filling in some road names from OS Locator, back when Ito used to run a service to compare OSM's coverage with OS Locator: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OS_Locator |
| 175188613 (Comments: 8) | Macchill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Duidelijk verhaal, dank hiervoor. Excuses dat ik wat eigenwijs ben. Wat alleen het probleem is dat stukje snelweg op de kaart nog als A13 te zien is, terwijl de hectometerpalen A4 aangeven (zoals de official_ref inderdaad aangeeft). Waardoor er ti... commented 2025-11-28 07:31:14 UTC by Macchill ♦1 |
| 172987995 (Comments: 2) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 241) | Hi melody Tej, I'll remember that for the future. Actually I wasn't looking at any level tags at all, I don't think they were mentioned in the task description. Thanks & Regards Bernard. commented 2025-11-28 07:07:35 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,998 |
| 173861160 (Comments: 1) | Justinebaekc (Discussed changesets: 4) | "Hello Justinebaekc I have fixed validation error between building & highway for way 1185752129 and way 304365439 Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping!" commented 2025-11-28 06:59:32 UTC by Swihail ♦33 |
| 174091498 (Comments: 1) | Lewis Munaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Lewis Munaz Thank you for mapping I have added buildings way 1447895014 way 1447895013 Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 06:57:06 UTC by Gorger ♦40 |
| 174054008 (Comments: 1) | trinity2145849 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello trinity2145849 Thank you for mapping I have added buildings way 1447927658 way 1447927657 Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 06:56:59 UTC by melody_Tej ♦23 |
| 174091320 (Comments: 1) | @Muneebafzal (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello @Muneebafzal Thank you for mapping I have added buildings way way 1447918560 way 1447918559 Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 06:55:49 UTC by Gorger ♦40 |
| 174090587 (Comments: 1) | @Muneebafzal (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello @Muneebafzal Thank you for mapping I have added buildings way 1447933607 way 1447933606 Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 06:55:01 UTC by Gorger ♦40 |
| 173124031 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 241) | Hello BCNorwich Thank you for mapping! I Removed covered=yes tag. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 06:53:37 UTC by melody_Tej ♦23 |
| 173112144 (Comments: 1) | rui228 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hello rui228 Thank you for mapping! I deleted level=1 tag. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 06:52:33 UTC by melody_Tej ♦23 |
| 174177329 (Comments: 1) | melody_Tej (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello rui228 Thank you for mapping! I deleted level=1 tag. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-11-28 06:50:52 UTC by melody_Tej ♦23 |
| 175217272 (Comments: 1) | 02826029060144502929130510688614624 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Mit Verbesserungen hatte dieses Changeset wenig zu tun. Es hat viele Grenzen zerstört. Aus diesem Grund habe ich einen Revert durchgeführt. commented 2025-11-28 06:42:07 UTC by Vinzenz Mai ♦36 |
| 175026562 (Comments: 2) | property0029 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Eski hâline getirdim. Avlunun içerisine ayrı bir yeşillik oluşturup onu landuse=grass ile etiketleyebilirdim, veya yeni bir alan eklemeden surface=grass kullanabilirdim ama wiki sayfasında şunu görünce vazge&ccedi... commented 2025-11-28 06:38:02 UTC by property0029 ♦2 |
| 175223273 (Comments: 1) | astron623 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175224819 commented 2025-11-28 06:24:50 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 175223304 (Comments: 1) | astron623 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175224808 commented 2025-11-28 06:24:27 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 175197792 (Comments: 2) | pfg21 (Discussed changesets: 23) | да. паралельность отметил, а тип поставил автоматически commented 2025-11-28 06:14:05 UTC by pfg21 ♦131 |
| 174443762 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_VectorRelay (Discussed changesets: 3) | When modifying road geometry fix the bus route. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.86043&lat=33.67035&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error... commented 2025-11-28 06:05:03 UTC by Mxdanger ♦84 |
| 175149743 (Comments: 1) | community_base (Discussed changesets: 1) | The author of these buildings appears to be Community Base themselves. I wonder if the reason they split it in two is because there are different numbers of floors in the two parts of the building? commented 2025-11-28 05:44:25 UTC by UtterClutter ♦40 |
 | 164879083 (Comments: 7) | NFZANMNIM (Discussed changesets: 150) | Every language has its longstanding conventions. Vietnam and Korea have a shared linguistic heritage as part of the Sinosphere. Transcriptions between the CJKV orthographies are normal, expected, and standardized – not an ad hoc guess by someon... commented 2025-11-28 05:20:59 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦589 |
| 175174714 (Comments: 1) | Yuno :) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Seems like it might be a shop=pet rather than a supermarket but otherwise great! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175174714 commented 2025-11-28 04:21:38 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175176573 (Comments: 1) | Peter Newman (Discussed changesets: 10) | TY for the improvements to the map! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175176573 commented 2025-11-28 04:13:04 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175222378 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://uploads.itd.sbcounty.gov/gis/parcelmaps/046207.pdf commented 2025-11-28 04:10:49 UTC by ieguy3 ♦13 |
| 175193451 (Comments: 1) | overthemoon_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175193451 commented 2025-11-28 04:05:59 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175196221 (Comments: 1) | earlydawes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks good though it does seem like you've potentially mapped your home address. I've mapped a few of the buildings around this, would love to get addresses for them as well. --- Published us... commented 2025-11-28 04:02:25 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 173867375 (Comments: 2) | S-zation (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi, I saw these cameras when taking a detour off the highway, so I’m not completely sure. City of Groton camera - probably spring of 2024 based off of the city’s PACT meeting minutes stating that they acquired flock cameras ... commented 2025-11-28 03:39:01 UTC by S-zation ♦118 |
| 175133506 (Comments: 1) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a friendly tip: try to keep your changes smaller, like focusing on one country at a time. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2025-11-28 03:23:29 UTC by julcnx ♦416 |
| 175221021 (Comments: 1) | TriangleMaple (Discussed changesets: 12) | I've noticed some noted 6.6 kW or 6.4 kW, however I'm not sure if that was due to a car already charging there or slight difference in models or how they were powered commented 2025-11-28 02:41:24 UTC by TriangleMaple ♦8 |
| 175220042 (Comments: 1) | 한국공 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175220448 commented 2025-11-28 01:58:19 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 175052473 (Comments: 2) | neurotik (Discussed changesets: 1) | So it is, thank you! TIL. commented 2025-11-28 01:47:10 UTC by neurotik ♦1 |
| 175179788 (Comments: 1) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 52) | Sorry! :D commented 2025-11-28 01:42:01 UTC by bbdr ♦5 |
| 162749095 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 69) | Love "mascot:name". Tremendous. commented 2025-11-28 01:27:15 UTC by watmildon ♦259 |
| 175201267 (Comments: 1) | Greky13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for contributing to the map! Just a few minor notes but I wanna be clear, the changeset is all good. When mapping a building you should try and position the outline where the foot of the building is, not where the roof is on the sate... commented 2025-11-28 01:03:34 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 175059475 (Comments: 1) | AliKarabulut1956 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Merhaba. Lütfen değişik açıklamalarınızda ne yaptığınızı kısaca özetleyiniz. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Doğan Taşdelen Bulvarı'na paralel isimsiz yola(way/707080392) &qu... commented 2025-11-28 01:01:59 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦172 |
| 175203516 (Comments: 1) | Railwayfan2005 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Looks good! Thank you for making the map better! :D --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175203516 commented 2025-11-28 00:53:47 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦26 |
| 174636360 (Comments: 2) | 漣澪靈 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 另外，一般来讲中国大陆的地名 name 项应当使用简体中文，您想添加繁体中文的话可以用 name:zh-hant 标签项的，烦请您注意 commented 2025-11-28 00:25:47 UTC by hahae ♦11 |
| 175088995 (Comments: 2) | toobusytolive (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi TheSwavu, Thanks for the fix. I'm still new to OSM and learn every time when I map something. Have a great day! commented 2025-11-27 23:47:48 UTC by toobusytolive ♦2 |
| 175218538 (Comments: 1) | Beinardus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Removed the Shell node, as streetview does not show it (and there is a over painted banner above the shop entrance what could have been the Shell logo) commented 2025-11-27 23:37:14 UTC by Beinardus ♦4 |
| 174284868 (Comments: 1) | Финский горячий парень (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2025-11-27 23:21:35 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,183 |
| 175203713 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 72) | `access=emergency` is not used, and `emegency=` doesn't show whether it's originally EVA-only. Emegency units using it should be treated as short-term closures functionally, not the same physical permanent damages. commented 2025-11-27 23:10:43 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175218048 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 119) | I po co się tak bawiłem, jak jest tag na oznaczanie jarmarku, który się przez niego nie renderuje... commented 2025-11-27 23:08:26 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 175127655 (Comments: 2) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 7) | okej dzięki, zmienię commented 2025-11-27 22:34:37 UTC by driedfish ♦4 |
| 175034177 (Comments: 1) | sebus066 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Rebonjour Sebus :) Tu as donné le nom à un chemin : chemin agricole privé. Mais ce n'est pas un nom, c'est une description. Le caractère privé se rajoute à partir du panneau de gauche... commented 2025-11-27 22:33:14 UTC by LySioS ♦135 |
| 175068601 (Comments: 1) | sebus066 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour Sebus, attention à ne pas tout écrire en majuscules et à ne pas oublier les accents commented 2025-11-27 22:24:46 UTC by LySioS ♦135 |
| 175215963 (Comments: 1) | UEisemann (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, why are you making these edits? You completely deleted an industrial area and a No U-turn relation. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175217319 commented 2025-11-27 22:22:24 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦137 |
| 175071698 (Comments: 1) | sebus066 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour sebus, On évite d'utiliser des d’abréviations pour les noms et il faut penser à mettre les majuscules quand il y en a, Merci pour les ajouts commented 2025-11-27 22:15:21 UTC by LySioS ♦135 |
| 175215790 (Comments: 2) | Fabryka Ogrodów (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175217116 Obiekt dodany został w zupełnie nieprawidłowej lokalizacji nieodpowiadającej adresowi do niego przypisanemu. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-11-27 22:12:26 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175216769 (Comments: 1) | MapowiczniAK (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-11-27 22:12:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175215356 (Comments: 1) | Gpi Tanks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opis zestawu zmian to nie miejsce na reklamę - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 22:06:54 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 172778313 (Comments: 2) | wouterko (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi jj000, dat is vreemd, in deze changesets zou ik alleen wikidata tags moeten wijzigen. Heb je een voorbeeld waar ik die tag heb toegevoegd? Zie hem voor veel wegen in de binnenstad, maar die tags zaten daar al op. Thanks! commented 2025-11-27 22:04:28 UTC by wouterko ♦4 |
| 174744400 (Comments: 1) | HungryElf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Какое приложение вы использовали для редактирования? commented 2025-11-27 22:04:06 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,183 |
| 175216544 (Comments: 1) | KieranW25 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I see that you requested a review. The changeset is very good, the level of detail on the building is great and you used a perfectly descriptive changeset comment. When mapping buildings in iD editor, you can select a building and press Q... commented 2025-11-27 22:02:37 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦37 |
| 175194927 (Comments: 1) | Mac76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-11-27 21:53:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175199685 (Comments: 1) | Liftingplan (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-27 21:52:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175189054 (Comments: 2) | Ula | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13335609025 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-11-27 21:52:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175026759 (Comments: 2) | cUbrA (Discussed changesets: 1) | super, danke dir! commented 2025-11-27 21:46:09 UTC by cUbrA ♦1 |
| 175191394 (Comments: 1) | globalprestige (Discussed changesets: 1) | Usunąłem opis punktu - OpenStreetMap to nie miejsce na reklamę commented 2025-11-27 21:38:30 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175167250 (Comments: 4) | Xavizard Knight (Discussed changesets: 12) | Cert el que dius. Perdó. Ara pensant-m'ho millor, crec que lo millor seria deixar sols l'area:amenity=bench a l'àrea i fer un node amb amenity=bench al seu mig. Així quedaria de forma similar a com es mapejen... commented 2025-11-27 21:35:00 UTC by Xavizard Knight ♦19 |
| 175188786 (Comments: 2) | Auto Detailing LENART (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 21:27:39 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175179330 (Comments: 1) | SaltonSea (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Gracias por contribuir en corregir la alineación de la calle José de Amenábar, pero como consecuencia a esto, me di cuenta que se rompieron varias relaciones multipolígono y administrativas y las tuve que corregi... commented 2025-11-27 21:25:02 UTC by mweper ♦432 |
| 147427384 (Comments: 2) | MC436 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Na podstawie strony Baza Kolejowa: https://www.bazakolejowa.pl/index.php?dzial=bocznice&id=42&oid=0&ed=0&okno=polozenie W terenie widać wąwozy w miejscu torów. commented 2025-11-27 21:22:16 UTC by MC436 ♦2 |
| 175211824 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 16) | Source: https://ledesk.ma/encontinu/adm-annonce-la-mise-en-service-de-la-nouvelle-autoroute-tit-mellil-berrechid/ commented 2025-11-27 21:20:28 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 173444408 (Comments: 2) | Shamsudin Ahmed (Discussed changesets: 4) | Supermarket owner gutu ahmed commented 2025-11-27 21:19:08 UTC by Shamsudin Ahmed ♦4 |
| 175215130 (Comments: 1) | melisomw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-27 21:03:10 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175213178 (Comments: 3) | MerijntjeB (Discussed changesets: 9) | De reguliere routers in OSM negeren bicycle=use_sidepath https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=51.530198%2C4.513117%3B51.530391%2C4.505146#map=17/51.530276/4.509126 Op bv de Openfietsmap routeerde he... commented 2025-11-27 21:02:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 119640920 (Comments: 6) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 152) | Bedankt voor de tip. Er valt altijd wel iets te leren. commented 2025-11-27 21:00:23 UTC by lyctkel ♦348 |
| 175146649 (Comments: 6) | Pèlerin Gris (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci ! C'est top y a plein de photo commented 2025-11-27 20:52:05 UTC by Roue-doudou ♦48 |
| 144279187 (Comments: 4) | joe2812 (Discussed changesets: 57) | Der User hat auch in Stuttgart hunderte von Gebäude überarbeitet und dabei scheinbar blind von Maps4BW übernommen. Dabei wurden Er hat bisher auf keine meiner Änderungskommentare reagiert, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-11-27 20:48:22 UTC by redd ♦448 |
| 175213968 (Comments: 5) | MerijntjeB (Discussed changesets: 9) | Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175213968 commented 2025-11-27 20:47:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 160748123 (Comments: 1) | CampusFrancazal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Quel était l'objectif de ces changements ? Et vous avez transformé un objet en "Campus Francazal Nord" ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917675007#map=16/43.54407/1.35990 Qu'est-ce que c... commented 2025-11-27 20:43:07 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦44 |
| 175187320 (Comments: 1) | edtahac (Discussed changesets: 2) | а зачем мержить элементы, находящиеся на разных уровнях? это принципиальная ошибка, layer как раз для элементов, которые не пересекаются. О... commented 2025-11-27 20:28:16 UTC by literan ♦6,885 |
| 149483507 (Comments: 2) | Alessandro Colomberotto "Mammut" (Discussed changesets: 2) | Semplicemente, non c'ò pensato di mettere le larghezza, comunque se ti interesse sono circa 2 metri commented 2025-11-27 20:24:22 UTC by Alessandro Colomberotto "Mammut" ♦1 |
| 175190872 (Comments: 2) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zawsze widzę że w edycjach z Organic Maps brakuje addr:city. Może coś jest nie tak z aplikacją? commented 2025-11-27 20:20:48 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175073837 (Comments: 4) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 112) | Thanks! commented 2025-11-27 20:20:38 UTC by RaccoonFederation ♦97 |
| 175020129 (Comments: 3) | Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (Discussed changesets: 5) | Daarnaast zie ik ook veel fouten met openingstijden, zoals Ma i.p.v. Mo en tijden als 26:00. commented 2025-11-27 20:12:30 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,026 |
| 175202002 (Comments: 1) | returningsam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. We're glad you're here (or perhaps returning, judging from your name?). Thanks for adding the details on this cafe! As a quick tip, its really helpful to fill out the `source` field on your changset, so othe... commented 2025-11-27 20:05:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦54 |
| 174789088 (Comments: 3) | LevanGo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi. you're right. I think "tertiary" is more suitable. commented 2025-11-27 20:01:01 UTC by LevanGo ♦6 |
| 167261000 (Comments: 4) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 134) | Może jeszcze raz: nastawnia z definicji jest budynkiem lub pomieszczeniem, więc nazwa budynku jest tożsama z nazwą nastawni w tym przypadku - tak samo jest w przypadku LCS Łowicz Główny (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913444481), LCS ... commented 2025-11-27 19:53:53 UTC by Anas masuris ♦148 |
| 175200223 (Comments: 2) | SharkGeos (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello The name was updated as is shown by the sign on the wall by the gate of the house “Casa de Trullens”. I aw the difference when I walked past last week. If this is incorrect then this change can be regressed. You can also see the... commented 2025-11-27 19:46:22 UTC by SharkGeos ♦3 |
| 163923804 (Comments: 5) | RobJN (Discussed changesets: 13) | As a further example, defibrillator boxes often have postcodes to describe their location and some have taken to expand to that to addr:* tags. As with similar objects, and to echo comments above, I think the consensus is if they're not places c... commented 2025-11-27 19:40:04 UTC by Paul Berry ♦134 |
| 96545686 (Comments: 4) | eBin (Discussed changesets: 22) | Aktualne plany są dostępne na stronie GDDKIA po wybraniu odpowiedniego odcinka drogi: https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia/msbd Wniosek o decyzję środowiskową został złożony we wrześniu 2014 roku, kilka dni przed opublikowaniem ostatecznego ... commented 2025-11-27 19:33:15 UTC by eBin ♦55 |
| 175197192 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous897234 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Source was https://t-doitsumura.co.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/xmas2024-map.png commented 2025-11-27 19:27:25 UTC by Anonymous897234 ♦10 |
| 175192980 (Comments: 2) | safado (Discussed changesets: 3) | yes, ok :) - did not see that option commented 2025-11-27 19:27:18 UTC by safado ♦2 |
| 175174347 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Poprawiłem. Nie stosujemy addr:place razem z addr:street. Proszę, zapoznaj się z zasadami mapowania przed wykonywaniem kolejnych edycji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:* commented 2025-11-27 19:12:58 UTC by uprkos ♦73 |
| 175172335 (Comments: 1) | miamilife (Discussed changesets: 1) | this has the same address as One Brickell Square, please add the unit number (addr:unit) or fix the addr:housenumber as currently the address is a pure duplicate. commented 2025-11-27 19:10:33 UTC by Udarian ♦536 |
| 175176899 (Comments: 2) | ASA LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi. its only one suite. im not sure how to add that or edit. it. first time doing this commented 2025-11-27 19:08:21 UTC by ASA LLC ♦1 |
| 175174059 (Comments: 1) | Fly Dreams (Discussed changesets: 4) | on Bing and esri aerial imagery this ALPR is within the road area, it is unlikely that the position is correct due to that, please fix its position. commented 2025-11-27 19:07:31 UTC by Udarian ♦536 |
| 174577380 (Comments: 3) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Alright, just remember your account is your responsibility! commented 2025-11-27 18:56:51 UTC by ceirios ♦72 |
| 175189922 (Comments: 1) | akademiacanvy (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-27 18:53:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 138640325 (Comments: 3) | Jan-Hinrich Fessel (Discussed changesets: 3) | I think that removing tourism=hotel achieves this already, rooms= can be also simply removed commented 2025-11-27 18:46:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 174690648 (Comments: 1) | Jasper Roest (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Jasper, Schuiven met de kaart geedt vaak schade als je onbedoeld een node selecteert en dan gaat schuiven in editmodus. Dan schuift niet de kaart maar de node met alles wat er aan vastzit. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?ch... commented 2025-11-27 18:42:42 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 161861833 (Comments: 1) | ferog_v (Discussed changesets: 17) | No se puede considerar una autopista una vía sin calzadas separadas, con cruces al mismo nivel y con acceso a fincas colindantes únicamente por el hecho de que sea de peaje. commented 2025-11-27 18:41:43 UTC by Peret ♦2 |
| 175210024 (Comments: 1) | Map_HeRo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ich habe in diesem CS diverse name-Tags, die keine Namen enthalten, sonderrn lediglich Beschreibungen, von den Objekten entfernt. Siehe dazu auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/grenzanlagen-bei-point-alpha-rhon/138084 commented 2025-11-27 18:40:33 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦80 |
| 175202201 (Comments: 1) | AliKarabulut1956 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yol ismi yakın bir zamanda (18.11.2025) değiştiği için old_name anahtarı ile 1431. Cadde ismini saklamak daha doğru diye düşünüyorum. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name commented 2025-11-27 18:39:50 UTC by keyyushi ♦16 |
| 175209973 (Comments: 1) | Koen van Zoest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Lijkt me oke... Een van de weinige eiken die blad houden. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-27 18:37:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 120006929 (Comments: 2) | Karthoo (Discussed changesets: 81) | Hallo, ich habe die Lage der Firma angepasst, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9683069361/history#map=19/48.788963/8.184449 commented 2025-11-27 18:27:51 UTC by Karthoo ♦218 |
| 175167540 (Comments: 2) | Manuel H (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, Stempelstelle Odenberg. Wollte die Tags von woanders kopieren, habe es dann aber vergessen nachzutragen. Gefixt. Danke commented 2025-11-27 18:27:41 UTC by Manuel H ♦58 |
| 174848987 (Comments: 3) | FILszew (Discussed changesets: 6) | motorway_link to nie jest autostrada, to jest łącznik autostradowy commented 2025-11-27 18:17:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175180599 (Comments: 4) | Trần Thanh Tuấn (Discussed changesets: 24) | Đây mình lấy ví dụ chỗ này: https://tranbien.dongnai.gov.vn/vi/organs/person/To-05-Dai-bieu-Hoi-dong-Nhan-dan-phuong-18/Chau-Ut-56/ Đây là địa chỉ 1 vị đại biểu HĐND phường: 293/8... commented 2025-11-27 18:10:07 UTC by Tommybara ♦100 |
| 175175165 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Adres jest niekompletny. commented 2025-11-27 17:51:05 UTC by uprkos ♦73 |
| 175190456 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Adres jest niekompletny. Brakuje addr:place. commented 2025-11-27 17:48:16 UTC by uprkos ♦73 |
| 175174388 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Nie dodajemy do nazwy ogólnej kategorii ('kwiaciarnia'), nazw nie zapisujemy też wielkimi literami. Poprawna nazwa w tym wypadku to: Mieczyk https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2025-11-27 17:44:16 UTC by uprkos ♦73 |
| 168326233 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 154) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12965169313/ This feature is an indoor transformer. You can tell by: the style of the door, the triangular yellow warning signs and the stencilled name / reference number. Typically the reference n... commented 2025-11-27 17:34:42 UTC by VictorIE ♦969 |
| 175207566 (Comments: 2) | golfminer13 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Je kunt het beste even vragen of Jeroen van de Gun even wil meekijken. Die is het meest bezig met dit soort inframappen (hier ook ) en kan de logica uitleggen waarom iets getagd als het is. Het zit vol met addertjes. https://www.openstreetm... commented 2025-11-27 17:30:21 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175198199 (Comments: 4) | golfminer13 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ik draai die twee changesets even wat terug, want nu worden het weer andere tags. commented 2025-11-27 17:25:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175208088 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 403) | Wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5070136 :) commented 2025-11-27 17:24:53 UTC by habi ♦1,973 |
| 174830816 (Comments: 1) | Mr Walrus (Discussed changesets: 3) | wrong, reset main line of A6 to trunk commented 2025-11-27 17:14:00 UTC by Cebderby ♦313 |
| 175203370 (Comments: 3) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | wg. Geoportalu NID commented 2025-11-27 17:09:45 UTC by WieKo68 ♦162 |
| 175169527 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hi bxl-forever, I had no clue about the new "VVR Limburg" tag. I will from now on pay better attention to these iD suggestions. Thanks, and happy mapping for you too. commented 2025-11-27 16:48:33 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦31 |
| 174785412 (Comments: 2) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 31) | И удалять слова из названия не стоит... commented 2025-11-27 16:45:54 UTC by Константин Гам ♦744 |
| 175200627 (Comments: 1) | Serge MAECHLER (Discussed changesets: 2) | Alors, désolé si je me suis mal expliqué précédemment. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175205717 commented 2025-11-27 16:34:40 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦324 |
| 157939259 (Comments: 4) | isthisme (Discussed changesets: 1) | So "living zone" in Latvia is the signed "dzīvojamā zona" (20 speed limit, pedestrian priority, etc.) On OSM these are tagged as living streets (highway=living_street). The speed limit there is always maxspeed=20. In this... commented 2025-11-27 16:29:37 UTC by HellMap ♦759 |
| 175188182 (Comments: 1) | Pronto20 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Pronto20 und willkommen bei OSM, bei name= werden nur Eigennamen eingetragen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name Wege innerhalb eines Schutzgebietes erhalten das access-Tag des Schutzgebietes, in diesem Fall also: ac... commented 2025-11-27 16:19:50 UTC by martinst ♦339 |
| 175144077 (Comments: 3) | tiresiasmonk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the tip! commented 2025-11-27 16:13:23 UTC by tiresiasmonk ♦2 |
| 175199382 (Comments: 4) | Sumurai8 (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/waarschuwing-plaatsen-op-opritten-van-autosnelwegen-vanwege-130-km-h/93165/11 commented 2025-11-27 16:12:48 UTC by Allroads ♦437 |
| 174352803 (Comments: 4) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 8) | I do not understand - how can you delete 120 footways and corridors by mistake? commented 2025-11-27 16:01:00 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦129 |
| 175196807 (Comments: 1) | Boris Buddel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Boris, du hast hier die wiki tags an einzelne Gebäude gemacht. Die meisten gehören aber an das jeweilige Gesamtgelände. Da müsstest du nochmal nacharbeiten und das korrigieren cheers --- ... commented 2025-11-27 15:47:40 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
| 174906700 (Comments: 7) | Norman Siehl (Discussed changesets: 3) | @BER319 ich schau mal wann ich Zeit finde um zu schauen. Ich melde mich mit Neuigkeiten sobald vorhanden. Liebe Grüße commented 2025-11-27 15:43:30 UTC by Norman Siehl ♦3 |
| 175202556 (Comments: 3) | Telecombinatie Eris (Discussed changesets: 1) | fixed weekdagen en format phone. Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175202556 commented 2025-11-27 15:39:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175201840 (Comments: 7) | VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld (Discussed changesets: 3) | Jam daar zeg je me wat. Ik vind het leuk om deze dingen uit te vogelen, maar ingewikkeld is het wel. Vooral omdat ik het (nog) alleen vanuit mijn ambu perspectief bekijk. Maar ben nog maar net begonnen commented 2025-11-27 15:31:36 UTC by VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld ♦2 |
| 175202957 (Comments: 1) | johaeha (Discussed changesets: 3) | Also shifted the corner of Väike-Tähe a bit so the path meets it nicely. commented 2025-11-27 15:31:03 UTC by johaeha ♦2 |
| 174544842 (Comments: 1) | mikkaelseppo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ktoś zgłosił brak nazwy tego parku https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5068015 commented 2025-11-27 15:26:53 UTC by kubahahaha ♦410 |
| 175202698 (Comments: 1) | assyzeus (Discussed changesets: 5) | آآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآ الله يبارك فعمر ســــــــــيدي commented 2025-11-27 15:23:55 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175161923 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 219) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as osm.org/changeset/166617410 and osm.org/changeset/164649036 and osm.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer in discussions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1752... commented 2025-11-27 15:16:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175200854 (Comments: 2) | DusseldorpStef (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #175201313 commented 2025-11-27 14:49:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174449013 (Comments: 2) | Maximoon_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah oui pour la monnaie j'ai eu un doute à cause de l'orthographe mais ok je note pour les prochaine que c'est bien ça ! En revanche pour le nom ils ont tendance à toujours le mettre en entier : soit "Le Pl... commented 2025-11-27 14:47:57 UTC by Maximoon_ ♦2 |
| 174867560 (Comments: 3) | MapLover2k19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, I completed them Best regards. commented 2025-11-27 14:44:50 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175190855 (Comments: 1) | firewire9000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo? commented 2025-11-27 14:44:39 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,710 |
| 175190893 (Comments: 1) | firewire9000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo? commented 2025-11-27 14:44:17 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,710 |
| 175190803 (Comments: 1) | firewire9000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo? commented 2025-11-27 14:43:51 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,710 |
| 175190739 (Comments: 1) | firewire9000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo? commented 2025-11-27 14:43:18 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,710 |
| 175190451 (Comments: 1) | firewire9000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo? commented 2025-11-27 14:42:04 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,710 |
| 175200601 (Comments: 1) | AdorableEevee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi, Probeer op de bestaande adresnode te taggen. Dubbel huisnummers bestaan eigenlijk niet in de Kadaster. Dat 'bedenken' bedrijven zelf. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-27 14:41:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174469194 (Comments: 2) | Maximoon_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour ! Ah oui c'est vrai, je n'ai pas fait gaffe, merci pour le tips ! commented 2025-11-27 14:41:26 UTC by Maximoon_ ♦2 |
| 162371499 (Comments: 3) | KhalidKashmiri (Discussed changesets: 11) | dzięki! commented 2025-11-27 14:39:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175200240 (Comments: 1) | AdorableEevee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-27 14:38:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175199069 (Comments: 1) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 13) | What is the source for those proposed roads? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175199069 commented 2025-11-27 14:36:56 UTC by ika-chan! ♦309 |
| 175198853 (Comments: 1) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 13) | This changeset was reverted for adding a filter road that is not marked according to Esri, and a service road that's blocked off by guard rails. Why are you adding things that do not exist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17520099... commented 2025-11-27 14:35:34 UTC by ika-chan! ♦309 |
| 148995504 (Comments: 6) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 109) | I think that geometry is different issue, but as possible solution, fixme=square may be added. commented 2025-11-27 14:30:25 UTC by Something B ♦144 |
| 175115454 (Comments: 7) | VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik ga hier van de week eens achteraan! Groetjes, John commented 2025-11-27 14:26:18 UTC by VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld ♦2 |
| 174886246 (Comments: 1) | Zoe Stanfill (Discussed changesets: 2) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-11-27 14:17:28 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 171361023 (Comments: 2) | SFGJimStreet (Discussed changesets: 17) | Bonjour, À l'heure d'aujourd'hui, je n'en ai aucune idée, mais je dirais oui. Maintenant d'un point de vue légal, il y a un panneau d'interdiction pour tout usagé au vu de l'instabilit... commented 2025-11-27 14:13:13 UTC by SFGJimStreet ♦12 |
| 175193612 (Comments: 1) | Terzner (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke :-) commented 2025-11-27 13:53:30 UTC by aixbrick ♦877 |
| 175195012 (Comments: 2) | Simon1595 (Discussed changesets: 5) | From the hot spring area to Zhipuqi area, from Yatung to Shyok,from Taksin to Gelling.Every time, you are the first to change the border, and we fight back passively.When the offensive and defensive situation changes, why don't you do it?You can... commented 2025-11-27 13:41:18 UTC by 3D打印 ♦2 |
| 175195278 (Comments: 2) | LudvigLind (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej! Tack för informationen. Jag brukar inte göra redigeringar i Stockholm vanligtvis och visste inte om att det fanns beslut om gatunamnen. commented 2025-11-27 13:41:09 UTC by LudvigLind ♦1 |
| 174900793 (Comments: 2) | ainhoah (Discussed changesets: 2) | En l’absence de réponse, j’ai annulé la modification. commented 2025-11-27 13:34:20 UTC by Ltrlg ♦94 |
| 175197245 (Comments: 2) | Lucas Kosters (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt voor de reactie, eggie! Ik kom graag met iemand in contact die mij kan adviseren mbt het maken van aapassingen voor het aangewezen terrein. Wij maken van OSM gebruik voor persoonsalarmering op de aangegeven omgeving (zorglocatie van Pl... commented 2025-11-27 13:06:09 UTC by Lucas Kosters ♦2 |
| 175175061 (Comments: 1) | OSMeteor (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo OSMeteor, Wege/Straßen unter einer Brücke bekommen kein "tunnel"+"layer" Tag. Gruß Zrop commented 2025-11-27 12:57:51 UTC by Zrop ♦114 |
| 175194642 (Comments: 2) | Aya Samir (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi ilias_, Thank you. We are all here to make OSM maps better. Best regards, Aya commented 2025-11-27 12:56:19 UTC by Aya Samir ♦36 |
| 175175044 (Comments: 1) | OSMeteor (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo OSMeteor, Schilderbrücken benötigen auch einen "layer" Tag. Bei Brücken sollten die Wege die auf der Brücke verlaufen mit dem Außenumriss der Brücke verbunden werden. Gruß Zrop commented 2025-11-27 12:51:23 UTC by Zrop ♦114 |
| 175192876 (Comments: 1) | ianusgis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. No need for a POI for the playground, the area is tagged as such. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-11-27 12:44:34 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,998 |
| 175189318 (Comments: 1) | PeterB-UK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM has a practice of "One feature, one OSM element". Thus no need for a pin as the building is tagged with the feature. I've amended the tags with your new info. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-11-27 12:41:33 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,998 |
| 175192240 (Comments: 1) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | Lijkt me oke. bicycle en horse heb ik verwijderd. Dat is allemaal default. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-27 12:36:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175192510 (Comments: 1) | Theijo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi, Info samengevoegd met adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-27 12:34:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175161776 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 219) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175196120 commented 2025-11-27 12:29:04 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175160241 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 219) | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175196088 commented 2025-11-27 12:28:12 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175192570 (Comments: 1) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hier svp toevoegen footway=alley Brandgang. Dat heeft te maken met de routering. Niemand ziet graag wandelroutes via brandgangen. Een kaartenmaker kan wat met die extra tag. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-27 12:19:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175194156 (Comments: 1) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | horse=no hoeft niet op voetpaden. mvg eggie commented 2025-11-27 12:16:42 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175128519 (Comments: 10) | Valerio Cardone (Discussed changesets: 9) | Allora aspetto, chiederò al Trolley Festival. commented 2025-11-27 12:16:25 UTC by Valerio Cardone ♦7 |
| 175194243 (Comments: 1) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | Review.. horse=no is default. Niet taggen dus op voetpaden. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-27 12:16:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175192123 (Comments: 1) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | Dag af, Verkeer. review_requested \tyes bicycle=no hoeft niet op highway=footway. Brandgangen krijgen een extra tag footway=alley MVG eggie commented 2025-11-27 12:14:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175018936 (Comments: 2) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 168) | Thanks for correcting the typo! commented 2025-11-27 12:05:50 UTC by solenoid jam ♦188 |
| 175154889 (Comments: 1) | Spielroute (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yolların hem old_ref=* etiketine hem de ref=* etiketine aynı değerleri yazmışsınız. Amacınız tam olarak nedir? commented 2025-11-27 11:59:45 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦172 |
| 175153787 (Comments: 1) | Spielroute (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yolların hem old_ref=* etiketine hem de ref=* etiketine aynı değerleri yazmışsınız. Amacınız tam olarak nedir? commented 2025-11-27 11:58:43 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦172 |
| 175194348 (Comments: 1) | inechcomtv (Discussed changesets: 4) | No need to add 3047 to the name, you already added ele=3047 commented 2025-11-27 11:54:06 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175165503 (Comments: 1) | Spielroute (Discussed changesets: 4) | Henüz Gökçebelen Tüneli(way/890969911, way/890969912) açılmamışken, halihazırda kullanılan yolların adına "Eski" kelimesini eklemenizi doğru bulmuyorum. commented 2025-11-27 11:49:41 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦172 |
| 173416022 (Comments: 3) | Merzof (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi, I've taken my time to reply because it's a complicated and controversial issue: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/post-towns-and-addr-city/137896/7 There's some use of addr:suburb in Saddleworth: https://overpass-... commented 2025-11-27 11:37:30 UTC by tomhukins ♦233 |
| 175159231 (Comments: 2) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 191) | Wydaje mi się, że jak już dawać link w takich miejscach, to powinien on się kończyć na skrzyżowaniach (lub na podjeździe, ale tu ich nie ma), nie w polu commented 2025-11-27 11:34:37 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦811 |
| 175044968 (Comments: 1) | mossyg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A short remark. You added a layer -1 to a building. Why ? This should mean that this building is underground. I removed the tag. commented 2025-11-27 11:34:31 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175141448 (Comments: 1) | big apple11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted the change (changeset 175194025). It changed the official_name of the city of New York. commented 2025-11-27 11:32:30 UTC by mtmail ♦160 |
| 175192533 (Comments: 1) | Fahmida Islam (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - using copyrighted sources https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175193863 commented 2025-11-27 11:26:42 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,437 |
| 175161372 (Comments: 1) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 8) | The house is not on layer=1, they're both on the same layer and should not overlap. commented 2025-11-27 11:11:03 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦144 |
| 175058239 (Comments: 2) | Ville_Echirolles_Environnement (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bien vu, merci ! Ça fait partie des espèces qui ne sont pas en saisie semie-automatique sur le plugin Every Door donc on n'échappe malheureusement pas à des coquilles de temps en temps... commented 2025-11-27 11:06:06 UTC by Ville_Echirolles_Environnement ♦1 |
| 173988040 (Comments: 1) | VLD322 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, De quelle source tires tu ces pistes cyclables qui n'existent plus sur le terrain ? Pourtant il est bien indiqué dans les données OSM que la place est en travaux. Bonne continuation Benoît commented 2025-11-27 11:04:57 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦194 |
| 174290769 (Comments: 1) | RicoElectrico (Discussed changesets: 44) | Pojawiła się uwaga dotycząca drogi/chodnika: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5056731 commented 2025-11-27 11:01:54 UTC by YomanNH ♦405 |
| 175054892 (Comments: 5) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 11) | @Laveure it's a treaty between Indonesia and Singapore https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/singapore-indonesia-submit-final-sea-border-treaty-to-un-as-they-celebrate-50th https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002804c... commented 2025-11-27 10:51:05 UTC by FajrAl ♦113 |
| 174116439 (Comments: 1) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 42) | Ciao. Perché hai riclassificato le highway in questa relazione a tertiary? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3215714 E' una strada di campagna percorsa esclusivamente da mezzi agricoli, nonostante sia una strada provinciale. commented 2025-11-27 10:42:52 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,470 |
| 175164251 (Comments: 2) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, this changeset is about Singapore's internal border which needs to be complete and fix and not touching the external border. This was contains Region, Planning Area, and Subzone. I did getting touch with the community before editing on their... commented 2025-11-27 10:42:44 UTC by FajrAl ♦113 |
| 174441381 (Comments: 1) | Dimitrios K (Discussed changesets: 1) | service=* are not supposed to be used on the main railway tracks. They are used for yards, crossovers and sidings only. commented 2025-11-27 10:41:30 UTC by ika-chan! ♦309 |
| 175176992 (Comments: 2) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, this changeset is about the island's coastline, not border. I did getting touch with the community on their Telegram before editing. commented 2025-11-27 10:38:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦113 |
| 175123676 (Comments: 1) | Serge MAECHLER (Discussed changesets: 2) | Si le bâtiment est démoli, ajoutez le préfixe « demolished:building » au lieu de « building ». Les numéros de maison multiples sont représentés par 11, 12, 13, 14,... ou 9-11-13-15-.... commented 2025-11-27 10:31:05 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦324 |
| 174982572 (Comments: 2) | Marek Vašků (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, if you are referring to when the changes are reflected on the standard OSM layer, it usually takes just a few minutes. You may need to refresh your browser cache, perhaps by pressing CTRL+F5. commented 2025-11-27 10:28:16 UTC by aTarom ♦847 |
| 30247052 (Comments: 1) | Ventlan (Discussed changesets: 96) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236310963/history - czy to rzeczywiście jest nazwa całego budynku? nie lepiej by railway=signal_box było z swoją nazwą jako osobny obiekt? commented 2025-11-27 10:24:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175140740 (Comments: 2) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 17) | ja, danke für den Hinweis commented 2025-11-27 10:17:49 UTC by Michael Spitzenberger ♦7 |
| 175174153 (Comments: 1) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 123) | Haltestelle in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175174153 wiederhergestellt --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175174153 commented 2025-11-27 10:07:29 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,440 |
| 172386123 (Comments: 3) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 54) | I see you've mapped the bridge signs. I've also added one in Godmanchester as node #13335666102. commented 2025-11-27 10:02:56 UTC by Paul Berry ♦134 |
| 175149952 (Comments: 1) | SQUIK (Discussed changesets: 6) | Jeszcze raz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 10:01:06 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175042930 (Comments: 1) | 02826029060144502929130510688614624 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Noch mal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-11-27 09:59:22 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175155929 (Comments: 1) | Lol3556 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello ! Do you know that phone number should be formatted with the international prefix ? Something like phone=0223071932 should be like: phone=+33 2 23 07 19 32 I fixed the ones you've added. Thanks for your contribu... commented 2025-11-27 09:57:38 UTC by cquest ♦278 |
| 174981266 (Comments: 1) | Jan Kropiwnicki (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 09:56:04 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175059434 (Comments: 1) | voxhumana (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-11-27 09:55:10 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175184101 (Comments: 1) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 7) | Do not glue street side parkings to roads. I fixed it. Additionally, changeset description is not a place to advertisement. "created parking road based on the field" is enough. commented 2025-11-27 09:55:06 UTC by YomanNH ♦405 |
| 174545971 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 34) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 09:53:01 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175186683 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 34) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 09:52:50 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175187906 (Comments: 1) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 112) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 09:51:58 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 174892062 (Comments: 1) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 202) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 09:51:38 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175042377 (Comments: 1) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 202) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 09:51:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175188057 (Comments: 1) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 202) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-27 09:51:15 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 175189608 (Comments: 1) | Pia Luisa Licaros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please note that I've used Bing Imagery.. commented 2025-11-27 09:44:58 UTC by Pia Luisa Licaros ♦1 |
| 173573895 (Comments: 3) | floquet nicolas (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bonjour, merci je vais donc la passer en sens unique (oneway = yes) avec un double sens cyclable en bande (cycleway:left = lane + cycleway:left:oneway = -1 + oneway:bicycle = no) commented 2025-11-27 09:42:53 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦182 |
| 175158701 (Comments: 1) | Xopcapuo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-11-27 09:35:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175188722 (Comments: 1) | GrabTH_Bulakorn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Edit brief: Adding village area #https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/143 #grabosm commented 2025-11-27 09:32:03 UTC by GrabTH_Bulakorn ♦3 |
| 169933865 (Comments: 1) | Vladimir_Krapivin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте! Откуда взялось это название для вершины, кто источник? commented 2025-11-27 09:27:41 UTC by b4en ♦1 |
| 173844137 (Comments: 1) | Micael da Silva Malheiro (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, auch hier die Frage, was soll der highway=service hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445445028 Dort ist kein Zufahrtsweg. Für welche software/routing engine wurde diese Eintragung durchgeführt? Viele Gr&u... commented 2025-11-27 09:23:06 UTC by dadavid ♦515 |
| 173960422 (Comments: 1) | Micael da Silva Malheiro (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, woher stammen diese Daten? Warst du vor Ort? zum Beispiel hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446211849 Dort sind sicher keine highway=service, sondern highway=path. Viele Grüße David commented 2025-11-27 09:21:03 UTC by dadavid ♦515 |
| 175144776 (Comments: 5) | Terzner (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zunächst müsstest du auch noch deine Änderung im Abschnitt Binsfelder Straße bis Stockheimer Landstraße korrigieren. Da gibt es offenbar auch keine expliziten Verbote. Ich würde die Werte übrigens nicht auf &qu... commented 2025-11-27 09:14:47 UTC by aixbrick ♦877 |
| 175188221 (Comments: 1) | Miraj Hair (Pvt) Ltd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Updated business details for Miraj Hair Sri Lanka. Added correct category (beauty_salon + hair_replacement), multilingual names, opening hours, services, and contact information based on verified local knowledge. commented 2025-11-27 09:09:52 UTC by Miraj Hair (Pvt) Ltd ♦1 |
| 175023453 (Comments: 3) | Hidoo00 (Discussed changesets: 34) | I don't have a perfect solution either. Is the height different or only the slope? Maybe something with a conditional based on track width can help? traffic_calming = cushion traffic_calming:width = 1.5 traffic_calming:condi... commented 2025-11-27 08:58:46 UTC by mueschel ♦6,739 |
| 175156492 (Comments: 1) | hugolagunadivintech (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revertido changeset por eliminar wikis sin sentido, y utilizar abreviaciones https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175187294 commented 2025-11-27 08:44:19 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦227 |
| 175184091 (Comments: 1) | Tengo Capital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/175186599 commented 2025-11-27 08:27:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175156192 (Comments: 1) | Dogman Bawong (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1. Please use meaningful upload comment, not a single useless word 2. Please explain what you want to do. `disused=yes` has already been used here. It shouldn't be deleted. commented 2025-11-27 08:05:36 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 168382183 (Comments: 2) | r3to (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sälü habi Merci fürs reviewen :) commented 2025-11-27 08:03:18 UTC by r3to ♦1 |
| 137097673 (Comments: 3) | BBAK-LUDO (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, La rotation du stationnement est une problématique qui dépasse OSM en effet. La mairie pourrait mettre en place une zone bleu. Je suppose qu’ils sont bien consci... commented 2025-11-27 07:59:01 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦39 |
| 175148491 (Comments: 1) | SxS822 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao. Hai tolto due way, due tratti della provinciale SP122, dalla relazione di un percorso escursionistico a catasto. Sono sicuro si tratti di una disattenzione da parte di un utente ai primi changeset. Per cui ti segnalo di fare maggiore a... commented 2025-11-27 07:45:54 UTC by Jrachi ♦808 |
| 172714435 (Comments: 1) | Vogelsangxx (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Vogelsangxx, that stationary shop "Blattgold" was already on the map so I removed your addition. Regards commented 2025-11-27 07:44:17 UTC by AlexSpritze ♦24 |
| 175160402 (Comments: 1) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19039 commented 2025-11-27 07:22:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175108296 (Comments: 2) | Vamsi8096 (Discussed changesets: 2) | There's been no response so I've removed several duplicated highways, footpaths placed on top of existing roads in 3 changesets. commented 2025-11-27 07:21:46 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,998 |
| 175177972 (Comments: 2) | CHANGHYEON (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19038 commented 2025-11-27 07:03:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 142138925 (Comments: 1) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 31) | partly rv - this is precisely the case for area:highway=footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175183798 commented 2025-11-27 06:55:29 UTC by yelisey90 ♦205 |
| 175183647 (Comments: 1) | DanhengOSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | 我反思，我不小心开了一个有点大的set（把东侧的一些学校改进去了） commented 2025-11-27 06:52:08 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦13 |
| 159517321 (Comments: 3) | bode_ES (Discussed changesets: 3) | So ganz zufällig war das nicht. Auf Maproulette läuft gerade eine Challenge zum Überprüfen von barrier-nodes, die knapp neben highway=* liegen aber nicht verbunden sind. Barrieren, die neben der Straße liegen, werden nat&uum... commented 2025-11-27 06:31:11 UTC by Mammi71 ♦264 |
| 175060805 (Comments: 2) | pesec (Discussed changesets: 88) | Здравствуйте. Спасибо за комментарий. Более актуальных данных, чем открытые яндекс-зеркала у меня нет. Попробую исправить. commented 2025-11-27 06:30:18 UTC by pesec ♦303 |
| 175151260 (Comments: 1) | GolovaGolova (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, now the school has different names in name and name:he - which one is right? commented 2025-11-27 06:00:33 UTC by Sanniu ♦586 |
| 175177862 (Comments: 1) | CHANGHYEON (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175181703 commented 2025-11-27 05:33:38 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
 | 175077926 (Comments: 4) | Luul Solutions (Discussed changesets: 4) | yes i have read it commented 2025-11-27 05:27:03 UTC by asdini ♦1 |
| 175180419 (Comments: 1) | jxpsert (Discussed changesets: 85) | Bron vergeten, betreft survey commented 2025-11-27 04:27:12 UTC by jxpsert ♦89 |
| 175104437 (Comments: 1) | жэж (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день. Видимо у вас опечатка - вы установили зданию 90 этажей. И ещё, пожалуйста пользуйтесь спутниковыми снимками Esri, они намного но... commented 2025-11-27 02:35:59 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,269 |
| 175127739 (Comments: 3) | wielandb (Discussed changesets: 31) | Parking on a residential street is allowed by default. Are you planning to tag them all? commented 2025-11-27 02:13:53 UTC by TheSwavu ♦570 |
| 175176857 (Comments: 1) | SteveMaptaskr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can see the changes commented 2025-11-27 02:06:03 UTC by Ravi_Nichani ♦1 |
| 175154658 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 109) | Wow what kind of doofus would add the letter w to the end of a surface tag. Couldn't be me commented 2025-11-27 01:30:11 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦8 |
| 175048318 (Comments: 1) | 코리아푸우 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19037 commented 2025-11-27 00:32:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175134661 (Comments: 2) | 김제송신소 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19036 commented 2025-11-27 00:25:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| X | 175154787 (Comments: 1) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 36) | Apologies, @Comino. This was a mistake. Thanks for picking it up. commented 2025-11-27 00:25:24 UTC by au-btcmap‑onboarding ♦2 |
| 175176332 (Comments: 1) | UEisemann (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Why did you split highways at intersections? If the ways have the exact same tags and belong to the exact same relations, splitting it is pointless. commented 2025-11-27 00:24:55 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦137 |
| 175174557 (Comments: 2) | hca (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ja, hab's schon bemerkt und revertiert. Viele Grüße hca commented 2025-11-27 00:12:47 UTC by hca ♦16 |
| 175168165 (Comments: 1) | talbialaaamiyousra888 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Petit conseil : sélectionnez un bâtiment et cliquez sur Q. Cela va rendre ses angles droits et rendre le bâtiment plus beau. Bienvenue. commented 2025-11-27 00:08:06 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 174960664 (Comments: 4) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yeah, I'm starting to realize that OSM US is really serious about emphasizing importance over built environment. I was under the impression that trunk road tags were good for expressway road edge cases in addition to road importance rather than ... commented 2025-11-26 23:45:23 UTC by Yushclay ♦8 |
| 175137330 (Comments: 4) | Rukkhadevata (Discussed changesets: 21) | "place=city" does not necessarily have to be tied with the administration status? commented 2025-11-26 23:41:43 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦18 |
| 3670578 (Comments: 7) | dankarran (Discussed changesets: 8) | Deleted. commented 2025-11-26 23:38:39 UTC by dankarran ♦98 |
| 172753464 (Comments: 1) | Kirseltam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what is this shop? Maybe it is of the brand Rajo, not Raya? Also I really doubt it has all those English and Russian names written on it. Are you sure it is a convenience shop (sells all kinds of basic foods)? Maybe it sells milk products only... commented 2025-11-26 22:59:08 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 151739759 (Comments: 1) | Tomkow1933 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Należało podzielic ulicę na 3 części i jednokierunkowośc dac tylko na środkowej. commented 2025-11-26 22:57:05 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,325 |
| 175167480 (Comments: 1) | calemapy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', &#... commented 2025-11-26 22:53:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175164480 (Comments: 1) | Anonim 777 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-26 22:53:20 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175157341 (Comments: 1) | sal256 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-11-26 22:53:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175167847 (Comments: 1) | bieszczad (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-11-26 22:53:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 174911945 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 309) | Witam. Widzę, że w końcu droga jest budowana. Moje uwagi: https://www.osm.org/way/1425781338 i https://www.osm.org/way/1425781339 jest dalej jako planowana droga. To jest wliczone do budowy i przebudowy DW nr 276. Poprawię to. Z ... commented 2025-11-26 22:45:42 UTC by DariaDX ♦2 |
| 175173490 (Comments: 2) | Pizzeria Alicante (Discussed changesets: 1) | A gdzie reklama? Aktualizacja danych zwykla commented 2025-11-26 22:25:04 UTC by Pizzeria Alicante ♦1 |
| 174972315 (Comments: 3) | User721 (Discussed changesets: 1) | note for future me: wikidata is Q86672343 commented 2025-11-26 22:22:29 UTC by User721 ♦1 |
| 175174441 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Proszę, zapoznaj się z podstawowymi zasadami edycji OSM przed wprowadzaniem zmian. Większość Twoich dotychczasowych edycji zawiera błędy. Nie zapisujemy nazw 'capslockiem'. Czy to na pewno jest hurtownia, a nie sklep? h... commented 2025-11-26 22:22:11 UTC by uprkos ♦73 |
| 167757890 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Usunąłem fikcyjny adres. commented 2025-11-26 22:14:32 UTC by uprkos ♦73 |
| 130326256 (Comments: 1) | BSN21M (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10277725595/history has shop = onlineshop that was added in this edit is it shop operating online without presence here? (in such case it should be deleted) Is it office of such company? (in such ca... commented 2025-11-26 22:11:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 174981340 (Comments: 1) | milenan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dzięki za edycję! commented 2025-11-26 22:08:56 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦27 |
| 175171562 (Comments: 1) | OSMeteor (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo OSMeteor, ich sehe hier Bäume und keine Straßenlaternen. Schau Du Dir das nochmal an. Gruß Zrop commented 2025-11-26 22:08:45 UTC by Zrop ♦114 |
| 145785692 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Całkowita fikcja. Usunąłem wszystkie "bary". commented 2025-11-26 22:07:20 UTC by uprkos ♦73 |
| 175156855 (Comments: 1) | Antoine chatelain (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13333875167/history - note that photos from SC notes are kept only temporarily and will be deleted once notes are closed commented 2025-11-26 22:06:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175173625 (Comments: 1) | Kancelaria Frejowski Chf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Obiekt usunięty commented 2025-11-26 22:03:13 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175172676 (Comments: 1) | Due Consulting (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175174079 commented 2025-11-26 22:00:30 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175172413 (Comments: 1) | Przestrzenie Bruna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opis zestawu zmian to nie miejsce na reklamę commented 2025-11-26 21:58:27 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175125726 (Comments: 1) | wx4caster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi wx4caster, Thanks for your first edit! I'm not sure an operator is really necessary as I believe Flock Safety technically operates the cameras and provides the data to law enforcement. So just setting it as the manufacturer shou... commented 2025-11-26 21:55:49 UTC by nullroute ♦7 |
| 174837324 (Comments: 2) | infopetal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, the name for this building could be updated to "Roger Brown Home and Studio." In other cases when I've added a Wikidata tag, this name update has occurred automatically, however it hasn't happened here. When I hover over the ... commented 2025-11-26 21:51:29 UTC by infopetal ♦1 |
| 175173066 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 27) | 👍 commented 2025-11-26 21:45:44 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,440 |
| 175035284 (Comments: 8) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ich habe das Weegenetz nach deinem Feedback ausgedünnt und die Einbahnstraße beim Radweg wieder entfernt, da es hierfür kein explizites Schild gibt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175173066 commented 2025-11-26 21:28:11 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦38 |
| 175171451 (Comments: 1) | denniskuijs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ti... We gebruiken in OSM de al aanwezige adresnodes om op bij te taggen. Dat is soms even zoeken als ze op een hoopje liggen. Ik heb ze nu samengevoegd. De Kadasteradresnode van de Jumbo had een andere postcode. Ik heb de Kadasterdata gebru... commented 2025-11-26 21:22:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175142753 (Comments: 1) | Kancelaria Prawa Nieruchomości Marek Foryś (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. OpenStreetMap to nie miejsce na reklamowanie swoich usług commented 2025-11-26 21:22:14 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 171932138 (Comments: 3) | Philip Newton (Discussed changesets: 4) | I would say the latter would look better and be more accurate just because the circularized areas here would imply that the trees actually do form a clearcut circle around the houses like that in reality, while a rough estimation tracing the canopy o... commented 2025-11-26 21:21:51 UTC by Joseph R P ♦382 |
| 175171817 (Comments: 1) | denniskuijs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, review_requested \tyes Lijkt me oke, gr eggie commented 2025-11-26 21:17:33 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175157069 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Obiekty usunięte commented 2025-11-26 21:15:55 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175156787 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172708 commented 2025-11-26 21:15:39 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175144694 (Comments: 1) | Samuel Jacob Schweizer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Samuel Jacob Schweizer, in OSM bilden wir die Realität ab und nicht die gewünschte Realität. Deine Argumente zum Schutz des Waldes sind zwar nachvollziehbar, für OSM jedoch nicht relevant. Entsprechende Informationstaf... commented 2025-11-26 21:15:37 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦17 |
| 145688935 (Comments: 1) | nilogian (Discussed changesets: 11) | ciao il sito web che hai inserito a gallina C S.r.l non è valido (www**-**) procedo a mettere il punto, ciao commented 2025-11-26 21:15:07 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦138 |
| 175156742 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Obiekty usunięte commented 2025-11-26 21:14:59 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175172384 (Comments: 1) | mevenh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, En dehors des Pays-Bas, svp veuillez soumettre vos commentaires dans la langue nationale ou en Anglais. salut, eggie commented 2025-11-26 21:14:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175156655 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Obiekty usunięte commented 2025-11-26 21:14:04 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 145689360 (Comments: 1) | nilogian (Discussed changesets: 11) | hey il sito web che hai inserito su scavolini, non è più online (o non accetta richieste https), procedo a rimuovere il sito web tr qualche minuto, ciao commented 2025-11-26 21:13:34 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦138 |
| 172672701 (Comments: 1) | Haftpflicht (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Haftpflicht, thank you for your edit and your contribution! I checked your changeset and noticed that you added addr: tags to a building way. In Italy, addresses refer to the entrance of a house or property, so the established practice and ... commented 2025-11-26 21:13:25 UTC by wildmaps ♦66 |
| 175156612 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172655 commented 2025-11-26 21:13:17 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175016190 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172629 commented 2025-11-26 21:12:23 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175016172 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172592 commented 2025-11-26 21:11:23 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175016147 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172574 commented 2025-11-26 21:10:44 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175016110 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172554 commented 2025-11-26 21:09:54 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175016048 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Obiekty usunięte commented 2025-11-26 21:09:15 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175172221 (Comments: 1) | mevenh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-26 21:09:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174981045 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172507 commented 2025-11-26 21:08:14 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174980999 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Obiekty usunięte commented 2025-11-26 21:07:23 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174980976 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Obiekty usunięte commented 2025-11-26 21:06:43 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174980919 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172424 commented 2025-11-26 21:05:41 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174980859 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172395 commented 2025-11-26 21:04:55 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174968282 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172366 commented 2025-11-26 21:03:53 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174968242 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172322 commented 2025-11-26 21:02:36 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174968210 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172285 commented 2025-11-26 21:01:11 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174968175 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172269 commented 2025-11-26 21:00:30 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174968112 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172228 commented 2025-11-26 20:59:20 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174857336 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172191 commented 2025-11-26 20:57:59 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174857284 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172170 commented 2025-11-26 20:57:09 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174857212 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172087 commented 2025-11-26 20:54:39 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174815813 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172052 commented 2025-11-26 20:53:27 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174815740 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172024 commented 2025-11-26 20:52:24 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174788865 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172011 commented 2025-11-26 20:51:36 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174788503 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Drogi zostały usunięte commented 2025-11-26 20:50:38 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174787800 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Obiekty zostały usunięte commented 2025-11-26 20:49:47 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174735886 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Drogi zostały usunięte commented 2025-11-26 20:48:46 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174716287 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171880 commented 2025-11-26 20:47:02 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175096399 (Comments: 2) | David Beck123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:27 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175096968 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:25 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175097929 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:23 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175098562 (Comments: 2) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:20 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175099202 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:18 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175099961 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:16 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175100451 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:13 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175100884 (Comments: 2) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:11 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175101320 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:08 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175102226 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:06 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175103120 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:03 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175135375 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:46:01 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175135680 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:59 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175135955 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:56 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175136158 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:54 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175136237 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:52 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 174677184 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171831#map=18/52.716150/21.892413 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:51 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175138432 (Comments: 1) | David Beck123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:49 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175138528 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:47 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175138887 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:44 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175139123 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:42 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175139434 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:40 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 174677072 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171831#map=18/52.716150/21.892413 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:37 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175140425 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:37 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 175140784 (Comments: 1) | WayneRooney1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977 commented 2025-11-26 20:45:35 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,503 |
| 174646095 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171793 commented 2025-11-26 20:44:31 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 172118647 (Comments: 9) | conifermapper do sul (Discussed changesets: 2) | "Manja de merda , porc racista ." : je ne vois dans ce qui précède rien qui puisse suggérer un régime alimentaire particulier des commentateurs de ces modifications. Il semble évident qu'il s'agi... commented 2025-11-26 20:43:42 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 174607129 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171755 commented 2025-11-26 20:43:35 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174571314 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171684 commented 2025-11-26 20:41:28 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174453304 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171642 commented 2025-11-26 20:40:20 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174428501 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171603#map=15/52.76333/22.13536 commented 2025-11-26 20:39:27 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174395509 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171548#map=15/52.71152/21.89033 commented 2025-11-26 20:38:15 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174150218 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171499#map=15/52.71245/21.89468 commented 2025-11-26 20:36:51 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 174149838 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Usunięto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171469 commented 2025-11-26 20:35:50 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175164310 (Comments: 1) | Physik15 (Discussed changesets: 2) | From Italy to Japan? That must have been a long survey. commented 2025-11-26 20:35:00 UTC by VJMK ♦3 |
| 173736421 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Wycofano: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171436 commented 2025-11-26 20:34:39 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 173736403 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Wycofano: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171318 commented 2025-11-26 20:32:19 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 173736380 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 52) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171286 commented 2025-11-26 20:31:37 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175132447 (Comments: 4) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah I didn’t even think of that. The pharmacy was connected in the back to the shop. Both are completely closed with all their inventory and interior taken out! The whole space is now sitting empty and vacant. commented 2025-11-26 20:25:43 UTC by SamosaMunch ♦2 |
| 175142750 (Comments: 3) | arzu çüçen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Düzenledim. Artık OpenStreetMap üzerinde de trafiğe kapalı. Ek olarak 641 rotasını düzenledim. commented 2025-11-26 20:20:21 UTC by keyyushi ♦16 |
| 175047976 (Comments: 3) | Paytonhenry04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I hope you haven't invested too much in the app yet. Have these keys been discussed with OSM people anywhere? Abbreviations in keys are frowned upon, capital letters are actually undesirable, and I have already mentioned the issue of tru... commented 2025-11-26 20:17:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175157531 (Comments: 6) | Vinber-Pro (Discussed changesets: 42) | Et sur l'article du pont je vois qu'en amont ce sont les Gardon et selon certains en aval le Gard ! Au fait, *prends* Gard à toi. :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183402217#map=16/44.03196/4.14082 Finalement les noms en o... commented 2025-11-26 20:11:08 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 175170223 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Traffic Light" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. If you don't know who the operator is LEAVE IT EMPTY, do NOT tag "unknown". commented 2025-11-26 20:00:05 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175166848 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Ppole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. If you don't know who the operator is LEAVE IT EMPTY, do NOT tag "unknown". commented 2025-11-26 19:59:00 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175166860 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Ppole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. If you don't know who the operator is LEAVE IT EMPTY, do NOT tag "unknown". commented 2025-11-26 19:58:23 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175168716 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Traffic LIght" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. If you don't know who the operator is LEAVE IT EMPTY, do NOT tag "unknown". commented 2025-11-26 19:57:51 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175168839 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Traffic LIght" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. If you don't know who the operator is LEAVE IT EMPTY, do NOT tag "unknown. commented 2025-11-26 19:56:08 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 134913830 (Comments: 3) | EinEngener (Discussed changesets: 130) | Finde ich richtig commented 2025-11-26 19:52:56 UTC by tom_yorados ♦118 |
| 175163753 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2823523784 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-11-26 19:52:26 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175049123 (Comments: 2) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 65) | yeah, thank you for the tip. I will. Those are basically IDs in a gov database, but there are also ref codes from paper documents and it's a real mess as you can imagine ;] commented 2025-11-26 19:51:39 UTC by Yog Sot ♦361 |
| 175138221 (Comments: 1) | edtahac (Discussed changesets: 2) | и зачем это? level это этаж в здании. Тут нет здания commented 2025-11-26 19:50:42 UTC by literan ♦6,885 |
| 175157723 (Comments: 1) | MR Print (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5257019377 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-11-26 19:40:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175156404 (Comments: 3) | ehamberg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por responder. Ya lo arreglé yo borrando lo que agregó. Los datos ya estaban en el recinto. Gracias de todas formas commented 2025-11-26 19:36:22 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,606 |
| 157715921 (Comments: 4) | LLlypuk82 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Не знаю как в идеальном. В обычном — описание правки не обязательно попадает во внимание и любой редактирующий принимает решение в со... commented 2025-11-26 19:33:09 UTC by LLlypuk82 ♦105 |
| 153452467 (Comments: 1) | Bąbel (Discussed changesets: 269) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237064754/history has underground = 1 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? commented 2025-11-26 19:25:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175112693 (Comments: 1) | tamas-t (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia! Mi az oka a név helyesírásilag helytelen átírására? A katasztrófa védelem oldaán is így szerepel: IX. Kerületi Hivatásos Tűzoltó-paran... commented 2025-11-26 19:05:12 UTC by vasony ♦541 |
| 175149646 (Comments: 1) | Faundare Capital (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted SEO vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175168078 commented 2025-11-26 18:59:08 UTC by citrula ♦973 |
| 175149517 (Comments: 1) | Faundare Capital (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted SEO vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175168078 commented 2025-11-26 18:59:08 UTC by citrula ♦973 |
| 175159042 (Comments: 1) | vossjan (Discussed changesets: 2) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175159147 commented 2025-11-26 18:47:10 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,140 |
| 175159147 (Comments: 1) | vossjan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das sieht sehr gut, ich habe keine besonderen Anmerkungen. Nur ein Hinweis am Rande: gerade dann, wenn die Anzahl der Kupplungen scho... commented 2025-11-26 18:42:19 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,140 |
| 175167120 (Comments: 1) | amandaleticia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, you requested a review. This changeset is in general very good. When mapping houses in ID, you can select a building and press Q, which will make the corners rectangular. Happy mapping! commented 2025-11-26 18:40:42 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦37 |
| 175159246 (Comments: 1) | bogdan_uri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nu mai sterge nodurile cu nume de cartiere. Sunt puse orientativ. Nu sunt puse asa ca sa ne aflam in treaba. Ai putin peste 200 de editari si te apuci sa stergi aiurea fara sa ceri parerea altora? commented 2025-11-26 18:40:37 UTC by rarad74 ♦321 |
| 175158303 (Comments: 1) | bogdan_uri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salut. Ba exista, orientativ. Au fost puse tocmai ca si orientare. Lumea stie ca acolo este zona Baba Novac. te rog nu ,mai sterge! commented 2025-11-26 18:38:53 UTC by rarad74 ♦321 |
| 175081686 (Comments: 1) | qp3n5nob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just wanted to let you know that King Soopers near Drake & College was already mapped and you added another duplicate POI... did you have data where it didn't exist? commented 2025-11-26 18:27:49 UTC by gpserror ♦227 |
| 175163320 (Comments: 4) | denniskuijs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bij deze... commented 2025-11-26 18:26:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175012608 (Comments: 2) | riverobserver (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi I looked at the edit and am confident I fixed the remaining incorrect tags. commented 2025-11-26 18:22:30 UTC by riverobserver ♦4 |
| 175151310 (Comments: 1) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hoi, Die voetpaden lijken we wel correct. Evt zou je nog verbindingen kunnen toevoegen zoals met de parkeerplaats. Wanneer een voetpad een brandgang is kun je footway=alley toevoegen. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 18:20:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175091416 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 158) | Hi, you used tags like "ref:EU:ENTSOE_EIC_11" here. The by far most common way to number tags is with a colon instead of an underscore, e.g. "ref:EU:ENTSOE_EIC:11". Could you change that? Given the sheer amount of number... commented 2025-11-26 18:18:20 UTC by mueschel ♦6,739 |
| 175160895 (Comments: 3) | thepang (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ahora sí he podido ordenar las paradas de la línea 191 que había introducido antes. Ya he subido los cambios de la dirección Madrid-Buitrago, después subiré las de la otra dirección... commented 2025-11-26 18:17:10 UTC by thepang ♦3 |
| X | 175161259 (Comments: 2) | thepang (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ahora sí he podido ordenar las paradas de la línea 191 que había introducido antes. Ya he subido los cambios de la dirección Madrid-Buitrago, después subiré las de la otra dirección... commented 2025-11-26 18:16:55 UTC by thepang ♦3 |
| 173241462 (Comments: 1) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 46) | Dag wim.. Tip.. access=private is voldoende. Ik heb de andere access tags verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 18:16:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175163401 (Comments: 2) | thepang (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ahora sí he podido ordenar las paradas de la línea 191 que había introducido antes. Ya he subido los cambios de la dirección Madrid-Buitrago, después subiré las otras. commented 2025-11-26 18:16:07 UTC by thepang ♦3 |
| 175165505 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. commented 2025-11-26 18:15:12 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175133410 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175133410 commented 2025-11-26 18:14:22 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175165400 (Comments: 1) | thomasvaer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Thomas.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 18:12:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175017267 (Comments: 1) | Cla6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Vous avez fait une coquille, il n'y a pas une voie cyclable de chaque côté de la rue, mais elle est uniquement du côté droit : cycleway=separate ou cycleway:right=separate serait plus approprié commented 2025-11-26 18:05:53 UTC by lenny32 ♦65 |
| 175163199 (Comments: 1) | jeroenim0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-26 18:04:43 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175139079 (Comments: 1) | Transpunk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Il y a déjà une traversée cyclable avec feu indiquée à cet endroit commented 2025-11-26 18:04:05 UTC by Mwax_UwU ♦2 |
| 175134208 (Comments: 3) | TaklamakanDesert (Discussed changesets: 5) | No worries, happens to the best of us! commented 2025-11-26 17:58:51 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 169791338 (Comments: 1) | Ipintza (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807531556/history has underground = 1 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? commented 2025-11-26 17:47:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175133456 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175133456 commented 2025-11-26 17:44:06 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175136829 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "City Pole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175136829 commented 2025-11-26 17:42:33 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175137344 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175137344 commented 2025-11-26 17:41:59 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175137565 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. Please provide supporting evidence that these cameras are operated by MTA, an agency that runs NYC's subways and buses... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-11-26 17:40:54 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175137580 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. Please provide supporting evidence that these cameras are operated by MTA, an agency that runs NYC's subways and buses... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-11-26 17:40:36 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175155176 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-26 17:39:28 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175155653 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-26 17:38:15 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175156407 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. Please provide supporting evidence that these cameras are operated by MTA, an agency that runs NYC's subways and buses... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-11-26 17:37:30 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175156434 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. Please provide supporting evidence that these cameras are operated by MTA, an agency that runs NYC's subways and buses... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-11-26 17:37:19 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175156528 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. Please provide supporting evidence that these cameras are operated by MTA, an agency that runs NYC's subways and buses... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-11-26 17:37:08 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175156586 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. Please provide supporting evidence that these cameras are operated by MTA, an agency that runs NYC's subways and buses... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-11-26 17:36:55 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175157007 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175157007 commented 2025-11-26 17:27:35 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175157037 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175157037 commented 2025-11-26 17:27:20 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175155239 (Comments: 3) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 9) | Volgens mij heb ik dat ook gedaan. Groet.. eggie commented 2025-11-26 17:27:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175124698 (Comments: 2) | MapMagics (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi TausifJutt, Thanks for reaching out. Since this road has an emergency=yes tag and there is an escape ramp for emergency situations, what are your thoughts on changing this to highway=escape?(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Desc... commented 2025-11-26 17:24:13 UTC by MapMagics ♦9 |
| 175120950 (Comments: 3) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 57) | I have the street name from the receipt. commented 2025-11-26 17:20:54 UTC by sheldonelectric ♦187 |
| 175122745 (Comments: 2) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 57) | I have copied the street name from the receipt. Maybe you will want to put it on the nearest street? commented 2025-11-26 17:19:34 UTC by sheldonelectric ♦187 |
| 175154727 (Comments: 1) | xamil (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dobrý den, pokud se ke kruháči napojuje např. secondary, tak ty jednopruhové části jsou pořád secondary, nikoliv secondary_link. Tam kde tuto chybu najdu, ji opravím. Více detailů je na ... commented 2025-11-26 17:06:36 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦224 |
| 172240905 (Comments: 1) | mapperich (Discussed changesets: 34) | Dr. Camilla Wiesenthal und Zentrum Für Frauenmedizin ist die gleiche Praxis commented 2025-11-26 17:01:15 UTC by coatix ♦3 |
| 174858816 (Comments: 1) | Łukasz Wasiak (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, If you are going to help out with TIGER review please make sure to actually remove the tiger:reviewed tag when you have completed updates. Otherwise it will have to be reviewed again... This one can also probably be a driveway or tra... commented 2025-11-26 16:58:14 UTC by rivermont ♦223 |
| 175163619 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 221) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 5068050 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-11-26 17:56\tclosed\tok 5068049 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-11-26 17:56\tclosed\tok commented 2025-11-26 16:57:48 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,606 |
| 175100732 (Comments: 3) | T-reks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Radwege müssen nicht zwingend mit einem Blechschild oder mit Fahrradpiktogrammen versehen werden, um Radwege zu sein. Ich denke mal, da sind wir uns einig. Wenn du eintragen möchtest, dass der Radweg nicht mehr benutzt werden soll/da... commented 2025-11-26 16:55:40 UTC by kadiwa ♦46 |
| 175163262 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 221) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 5068035 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-11-26 17:47\tclosed\tok 5068042 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-11-26 17:47\tclosed\tok 5068029 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-11-26 17:47\tclosed\tok 5068036 (iD)\tfel... commented 2025-11-26 16:55:12 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,606 |
| 172748495 (Comments: 1) | dblanzac (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour. Je remarque que, par une série de groupes de modifications comme celui-ci, vous avez ajouté toute une série de noms de sorties comme « Lespinet - Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil - Les Demoiselles ... commented 2025-11-26 16:49:20 UTC by Penegal ♦31 |
| 175135508 (Comments: 1) | TriangleMaple (Discussed changesets: 12) | I have gone through this same process of realization. I have been observing your mapping work and I want to say thanks for your contributions! commented 2025-11-26 16:48:35 UTC by joel56dt ♦186 |
| 139406171 (Comments: 1) | CaLAbarca (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702332275/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 16:45:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 170731856 (Comments: 12) | Penegal (Discussed changesets: 18) | Peut-être que les panneaux ont été retirés parce qu’ils faisaient, en quelque sorte, doublon ? Autant donner un numéro à une sortie peut faire sens : d’un point de vue administratif, &cce... commented 2025-11-26 16:41:18 UTC by Penegal ♦31 |
| 173385795 (Comments: 4) | conifermapper do sul (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pas occitan non plus. Merci de respecter OpenStreetMap et ses contributeurs, notamment je répète, occitans. Contrairement à vous OSM respecte l'occitan mais ne cherche pas à l'imposer. Si vous avez un probl... commented 2025-11-26 16:40:12 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 175078372 (Comments: 2) | LakeTana (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi TausifJutt, In order to keep discussion in one thread, I have addressed your comment on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175078260. commented 2025-11-26 16:36:24 UTC by LakeTana ♦8 |
| 175078422 (Comments: 2) | LakeTana (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi TausifJutt, In order to keep discussion in one thread, I have addressed your comment on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175078260. commented 2025-11-26 16:36:01 UTC by LakeTana ♦8 |
| 175078260 (Comments: 2) | LakeTana (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello TausifJutt, Thank you for reaching out. It looks like these short roads are escape ramps for emergency purposes. What do you think about changing them to highway=escape per this OSM wiki article? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:high... commented 2025-11-26 16:34:43 UTC by LakeTana ♦8 |
| 131237000 (Comments: 1) | paolozamp (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131692942/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 16:34:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 169797375 (Comments: 1) | Sanben (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419069320/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 16:34:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 143316580 (Comments: 3) | CarloCesarini (Discussed changesets: 4) | thanks! commented 2025-11-26 16:33:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 119290697 (Comments: 2) | Skyzzato (Discussed changesets: 1) | No, It has width 0,25 meter. commented 2025-11-26 16:28:24 UTC by Skyzzato ♦2 |
| 175161032 (Comments: 1) | Shivsz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yep.. correct.. Dan paar keer ctrl f5 toetsen en zie je effect.. Cache legen van je browser... of geduld... werkt ook. commented 2025-11-26 16:12:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 173027347 (Comments: 1) | adster546 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks for adding this. I think it might make more sense to map the bike path you added for Amphitheater road as a bike lane. I've ridden on it, and it isn't really separated from the road at all. Just a thick painted line. commented 2025-11-26 16:11:53 UTC by YoYoJeffery ♦1 |
| 175128744 (Comments: 1) | NicoleAndrea (Discussed changesets: 1) | reversado commented 2025-11-26 16:05:31 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,606 |
| 175159649 (Comments: 5) | Shivsz (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaartelementen commented 2025-11-26 16:04:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175153481 (Comments: 3) | Warzel_T (Discussed changesets: 10) | :) commented 2025-11-26 15:40:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175134153 (Comments: 1) | BotafogoPR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Não adicione dados que não existem --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175134153 commented 2025-11-26 15:38:35 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,187 |
| 172634141 (Comments: 4) | JigAma (Discussed changesets: 8) | Nan, juste ça m'arrive perso de vérifier si y'a un arrêté municipal sur cette voie, et s'il y en a pas marquer la voie en DSC, car si quelqu'un se prenait une amende, le tribunal donnerait raison au v&ea... commented 2025-11-26 15:30:36 UTC by JigAma ♦9 |
| 155362639 (Comments: 3) | milet (Discussed changesets: 19) | Actually, width doesn't make sense at all. Removed it. maxwidth:physical=1 was already set. commented 2025-11-26 15:29:22 UTC by milet ♦96 |
| 167430294 (Comments: 2) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 139) | Hi, I didn't set out to map the shop, it was something that iD pointed out was mis-tagged. I think I was mapping churches in Lesotho, southern Africa that day and when investigating odd tagging for the churches in Lesotho, I found ... commented 2025-11-26 15:26:05 UTC by VictorIE ♦969 |
| 175133516 (Comments: 2) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 8) | Removed the bad colour tag, was having issues with iD entering weird info and resorted to copy/paste. commented 2025-11-26 15:24:08 UTC by j0hn33y ♦13 |
| 175156698 (Comments: 3) | Shivsz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Volgens mij moet je een node aanmaken Dan rechts klikken en dan krijg je een menu. Ik gebruik een andere editor. basisbewerkingen iD https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/#basisbewerkingen-met-id Mapse commented 2025-11-26 15:21:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174227238 (Comments: 1) | mina-ble (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175159314#map=19/16.495363/80.402489 ... commented 2025-11-26 15:20:05 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175157409 (Comments: 5) | Shivsz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Top! commented 2025-11-26 15:19:30 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175153753 (Comments: 1) | Warzel_T (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dag Warzel.. Ik heb er even meadow van gemaakt en de vlakken verbonden. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 15:19:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 173252894 (Comments: 2) | Oderradler (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ja die Breite muss noch rein, ist etwa 10 cm dick. Siehe hier: https://mapillary.com/map/im/433846509361533 commented 2025-11-26 15:17:41 UTC by Oderradler ♦3 |
| 174282474 (Comments: 1) | MAMOUNAELLE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175159130#map=19/16.476332/80.3546... commented 2025-11-26 15:15:59 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175154262 (Comments: 1) | Jack1920 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Jack Hier staan wel heel veel categorieën door elkaar. icecream, information=office? gift shop? name Pizza peccobello without amenity=restaurant. Please solve the puzzle. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 15:15:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 113625211 (Comments: 1) | Nikita Moiseev (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3702211964/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 15:15:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 151808951 (Comments: 1) | Vlados143948 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11932969626/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 15:15:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 169779592 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13039712173/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 15:15:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 174077651 (Comments: 1) | Mériem (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174185871#map=19/16.505058/80.319641<... commented 2025-11-26 15:10:22 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175156488 (Comments: 1) | VRU_JeroenS (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dag Jeroen. Het paaltje heb ik verbonden net het wegdeel. Het zal anders niets doen. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 15:09:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174068866 (Comments: 1) | Alinelol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175158771 --- ... commented 2025-11-26 15:06:43 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175154355 (Comments: 2) | MartinaeyNL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fietsoversteek toegevoegd. Volgens de haaientanden oneway=yes commented 2025-11-26 14:52:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174582640 (Comments: 2) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Pewnie moja wina, ponieważ poprawki naniesione przese mnie nie uważałem za import, gdyż każdy obiekt jest poprawiany osobno, a uzupełnienia, często już istniejących danych, nie uważałem za godne dyskusji. Żródłem danych do popr... commented 2025-11-26 14:51:27 UTC by WieKo68 ♦162 |
| 175028077 (Comments: 4) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Ok, dzięki. commented 2025-11-26 14:49:36 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 174942454 (Comments: 3) | sikorka120 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Szedłem tamtędy i jest to najkrótsza droga między Dyrekcyjną a Suchą, znaków zakazu nie ma i moim zdaniem *=desitnation tu nie pasuje. Jest wiele dróg na terenach prywatnych (np. przy supermarketach) gdzie można użyć tego... commented 2025-11-26 14:49:03 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 124057002 (Comments: 1) | ZDrKondler (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9909876889/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 14:48:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 165609396 (Comments: 1) | mabehn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12798650651/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 14:48:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 130222627 (Comments: 1) | tyomox (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10271860029/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 14:47:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 174281582 (Comments: 1) | Akouk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175157763 Please use JOSM for bett... commented 2025-11-26 14:43:42 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 174861573 (Comments: 3) | OlgierdR (Discussed changesets: 20) | Jeśli ścieżka jest i dla pieszych, i dla rowerzystów to stosujemy [highway=path]. A ta kładka była z tego co wiem projektowana z myślą o rowerzystach, zatem [highway=path] tu najbardziej pasuje, jak jest zresztą już po obu stronach te... commented 2025-11-26 14:43:27 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175157068 (Comments: 3) | Vinber-Pro (Discussed changesets: 42) | cela annule ceci Groupe de modifications : 173385795 récupération d'une partie des noms occitans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175157531 commented 2025-11-26 14:38:46 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,284 |
| 174431928 (Comments: 1) | BESSONR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). JOSM is a better tool with plugin to draw building --- #REVI... commented 2025-11-26 14:37:16 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 174601285 (Comments: 2) | Anilbyakula (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175157494 --- ... commented 2025-11-26 14:34:51 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175127705 (Comments: 1) | BrianMitchL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Brian, Just so you know, there were two tags I had set previously that were still on this node, ‘construction:amenity=cafe’ and ‘construction:name=_’ (following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix).... commented 2025-11-26 14:31:03 UTC by scrambling_panda ♦12 |
| 175139837 (Comments: 4) | Barlage Computer Hardware (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Barlage.. Op de standaardkaart direct zichtbaar. Soms helpt cache leegmaken van de browser ctrl f5 een paar keer. Sommige apps moeten eerst hun update hebben. Dat verschilt. Mvg eggie commented 2025-11-26 14:30:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 167083955 (Comments: 2) | GrooveBox (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Jonas, Good spot. I think it was supposed to be "name" rather than "natural". (Its the adjacent item in the drop down list). I've updated all the tags on the node in line with the NGED Import project guidlines: http... commented 2025-11-26 14:25:38 UTC by GrooveBox ♦15 |
| 174828113 (Comments: 1) | Kedhar Sairam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Hello Kedhar Sairam, Please add tags to the way you have added. Look at similar shapes on... commented 2025-11-26 14:16:35 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 157330625 (Comments: 2) | NVBW_Seifert (Discussed changesets: 21) | i have deleted the tag width. I tried to say with this tagging, that there is no real room to navigate for people on a platform, because there is no platform, it is simple on the road, without a sidewalk commented 2025-11-26 14:05:17 UTC by NVBW_Seifert ♦27 |
| 175146296 (Comments: 1) | Lukassomik (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-11-26 14:01:06 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175124577 (Comments: 2) | Anna Marvin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh thank you I wasn't sure what I was doing wrong. I will make this one a point instead of park, I'm assuming that was the problem. Any other advice is appreciated thank you! commented 2025-11-26 14:00:07 UTC by Anna Marvin ♦1 |
| 175154504 (Comments: 1) | Hubert213769 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-11-26 13:51:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175132230 (Comments: 1) | FiodorN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Why you deleted data from the map without explanation? You are on a first edit and we could consider this vandalism. commented 2025-11-26 13:46:54 UTC by rarad74 ♦321 |
| 129490830 (Comments: 1) | InstaZDLL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10224317577/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 13:43:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 152978656 (Comments: 1) | Bizmut (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11998353323/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 13:43:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 147110094 (Comments: 1) | Northernmum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11589839968/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 13:43:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 161978191 (Comments: 1) | ACKZESIBLE (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12439467082/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 13:43:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 134002078 (Comments: 1) | JerryRiverside (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754868509/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 13:43:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 164688026 (Comments: 1) | José David Galindo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9465064121/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit how something exist and have width=0? commented 2025-11-26 13:42:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175127009 (Comments: 2) | gregorisan (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zgadzam się z przedmówcą. Unclassified to drogi między residential a tertiary, czyli takie, które łączą miejscowości lub osiedla w mieście, ale nie są na tyle ważne, aby być tertiary. Niestety wiele osób używa kategor... commented 2025-11-26 13:35:59 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦811 |
| 101126552 (Comments: 1) | Lolacggg (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour, j'ai supprimé la table de ping-pong que vous aviez créée car elle n'est pas sur un espace public. Pour des cartes personnalisées, il est possible d'utiliser umap. cordialement commented 2025-11-26 13:35:16 UTC by enezeg ♦30 |
| 175002204 (Comments: 2) | BartHanssens (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hmz, lastig. Het staat nu leeg maar het is niet zeker of er iets nieuws komt (het is al vele jaren de leeronderneming / winkel / café... van het H-Hart & College, elk jaar een ander thema op dezelfde locatie: https://archive.is/ntV9... commented 2025-11-26 13:32:35 UTC by BartHanssens ♦6 |
| 171213707 (Comments: 1) | Orang biasa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mau tanya, apakah sekarang rel KA percabangan Indralaya sudah aktif lagi (sudah dilalui KA lagi)? Kalau belum, saya rasa sebaiknya tetap diberikan tag railway:disused. commented 2025-11-26 13:24:51 UTC by RusticCloud3325 ♦2 |
| 174775814 (Comments: 2) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 326) | Ich hatte ein anderes Beispiel benutzt, welches genau weiß ich nicht mehr. Siehe auch https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2gfZ LG commented 2025-11-26 13:24:43 UTC by geozeisig ♦230 |
| 175040866 (Comments: 1) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 11) | Jeśli jest living street w terenie, to rekomendowałbym highway=living_street, chyba że są jakieś przeciwwskazania. foot=yes jest niepotrzebne, motor_vehicle=yes nie polecam, chyba że uzasadnione oznakowaniem. commented 2025-11-26 13:19:15 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,049 |
| 162686150 (Comments: 1) | jdmontes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242298634/history has shop = online that was added in this edit is it shop operating online without presence here? (in such case it should be deleted) Is it office of such company? (in such case off... commented 2025-11-26 13:18:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 173068957 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 17) | Note that images at https://streetcomplete.app are hosted there only temporarily and deleted once note is closed commented 2025-11-26 13:18:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 172287968 (Comments: 1) | RobotFK (Discussed changesets: 21) | Note that images at https://streetcomplete.app are hosted there only temporarily and deleted once note is closed commented 2025-11-26 13:17:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 68593867 (Comments: 1) | QZ76 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Questo percorso risulta attualmente chiuso. commented 2025-11-26 13:16:45 UTC by QZ76 ♦2 |
| 175153886 (Comments: 1) | silvino61 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for your edit! To make it easier for other mappers to immediately understand what you did, please take the time and write proper changeset comments. Her is more info on that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_change... commented 2025-11-26 13:16:02 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦37 |
| 175042249 (Comments: 2) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 37) | good point, thanks! commented 2025-11-26 13:13:14 UTC by wombatmaper ♦84 |
| 126305305 (Comments: 1) | sorzebs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156769328/history has surface = pflasterstein that was added in this edit Is it surface=sett or is it surface=paving_stones in this case? Or maybe surface=unhewn_cobblestone? Or maybe something else? commented 2025-11-26 13:08:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175149563 (Comments: 1) | Robin Stratton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's OSM practice to make amendments/corrections to any existing feature rather than deleting and redrawing. Thus, all the mapping history of a feature is maintained. I've reverted the changeset then ... commented 2025-11-26 13:07:46 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,998 |
| 175109331 (Comments: 2) | Mapiate (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi mcliquid, apologies for that. I didn't realize the bounding box had grown so large. I'll keep a closer eye on that. commented 2025-11-26 12:43:54 UTC by Mapiate ♦32 |
| 175152750 (Comments: 2) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 366) | reverted own changeset commented 2025-11-26 12:38:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175152698 (Comments: 1) | Qvkeg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ошибка в описании. Не налево, а направо. С Плеханова грузовики могут повернуть толькто направо commented 2025-11-26 12:35:29 UTC by Qvkeg ♦1 |
| 175001931 (Comments: 2) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 134) | Duplikaty, nie pobrałem z okienka kamer commented 2025-11-26 12:29:56 UTC by Anas masuris ♦148 |
| 174581371 (Comments: 1) | Aishitha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Some of the building outlines are not clear from satellite images. Did you use local knowledge to map? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174581371 commented 2025-11-26 12:23:49 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175151057 (Comments: 2) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | Als voorbeeld trapje toegevoegd en pad doorverbonden met de Geerenweg. noexit=yes verwijderd. commented 2025-11-26 12:23:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175137510 (Comments: 1) | WanakaLake (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. Please add type of service roads and acces. Probably the most of them have private acces and driveway if acces is in some comercial areas. Living streets if need acces to private residential areas. Thanks. commented 2025-11-26 12:15:29 UTC by rarad74 ♦321 |
| 175139586 (Comments: 1) | ODP 95570 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello ODP 95570, thanks for your edits with iD. A quick remark: this changeset includes modifications in two completely separate areas — Paris/Cergy and Oletta on Corsica. Even though the edits were small, combining distant locations int... commented 2025-11-26 12:13:37 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175151484 (Comments: 1) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | Tip... Die achterommetjes achterhuizen naar garages worden vaak getagd als highway=service met service=alley Over een parkeerplaats highway=service met service=parking_aisle MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 12:11:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174469087 (Comments: 1) | ZOUZOUDU59 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Please check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175151553#map=19/16.644673/... commented 2025-11-26 12:04:08 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175149001 (Comments: 1) | wborn (Discussed changesets: 5) | area yes heb ik verwijderd. Dat hoort niet op landuse. Soms gebruiken we dat om wegen als een vlak te laten renderen. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 12:02:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175151302 (Comments: 1) | anszejek (Discussed changesets: 6) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-26 12:01:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175150490 (Comments: 2) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | maxspeed verwijderd commented 2025-11-26 12:00:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175137799 (Comments: 1) | Aianov (Discussed changesets: 18) | Если меняете основное название на казахский, то необходимо продублировать его в поле name:kk commented 2025-11-26 11:54:51 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦38 |
| 175148700 (Comments: 1) | letsridebikes (Discussed changesets: 42) | In accordance with discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ptv2-tagging-a-bus-route-that-changes-number-halfway-through-journey/138429 commented 2025-11-26 11:54:49 UTC by letsridebikes ♦66 |
| 175067918 (Comments: 1) | Aianov (Discussed changesets: 18) | Вы уверены, что во Дворце Школьников больше нет Обсерватории? commented 2025-11-26 11:51:35 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦38 |
| 175151001 (Comments: 1) | afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (Discussed changesets: 22) | Dag afd verkeer. Je voetpad had geen verbinding met de hoofdrijbaan. Ik heb een verbinding gemaakt. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 11:50:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175149708 (Comments: 1) | Macchill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-26 11:47:25 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175126002 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Sind die ganzen möglichen Wege wirklich eine Verbesserung der Karte? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126002 commented 2025-11-26 11:46:45 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,440 |
| 175150767 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 119) | Małe uzupełnienia dróżek. Parkingi wg wizji lokalnej są oddzielnie zarządzane. Potwierdzają to dokumenty planistyczne, gdzie w nich nie są wyjęte pod teren zamknięty. commented 2025-11-26 11:45:29 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 174243654 (Comments: 1) | anushaaee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check my revision https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175150381#map=19/15.491262/80.035607 What is VR? Abbreviations are to be avoided in name as per OSM guidelines. Please join https://web.telegram.org/k/#@osmandhra --- |
 | 175113837 (Comments: 1) | mkarau (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, mkarau, Thank you very much for your help in updating the OSM maps in the UAE. I noticed that you added several new roads, and I verified them using recent images dated (Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-11-17). However, I also n... commented 2025-11-26 11:36:22 UTC by mona_magdy ♦18 |
| 174208016 (Comments: 1) | GHANTA JEEVAN BABU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check my revision https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175149811#map=19/16.789177/80.851746 Please join OSM Andhra Pradesh telegram channel https://web.telegram.org/k/#@osmandhra --- Published ... commented 2025-11-26 11:24:30 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175147756 (Comments: 1) | bitsu (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello bitsu, Please split your uploads so that they cover smaller areas. For example this upload is spanning from Bangalore to Hyderabad because of a deletion in Bangalore ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12651716987/history/2 )This imped... commented 2025-11-26 11:18:20 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175135432 (Comments: 1) | mnpezz (Discussed changesets: 2) | All capital letters is not allowed. Please read new Wiki page: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Square-Merchants commented 2025-11-26 11:12:14 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
| 173315231 (Comments: 2) | MrTec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dziękuję bardzo za sugestje:) Jesli chodzi o Moko-Tuff to miejsce pod ta nazwa nie istnieje już od maja. Z tego co mi wiadomo na dniach ma być coś nowego w tym samym klimacie. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-11-26 11:07:20 UTC by MrTec ♦1 |
| 175111480 (Comments: 2) | rui228 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Olá, Porque o portão é uma estrutura fisica que bloqueia aquela via e por isso faz parte dela. Está correctamente mapeado. Confere pf na wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#How_to_map_barrier_nodes... commented 2025-11-26 11:00:39 UTC by luisforte ♦137 |
| 92058971 (Comments: 3) | Crusier (Discussed changesets: 4) | Nie wiem czy aktualne, można sprawdzić jak są zrobione inne schroniska dla zwierząt w Polsce teraz i czy to działa. commented 2025-11-26 10:59:04 UTC by Crusier ♦13 |
 | 175133622 (Comments: 1) | NelsonChilombe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You import 10 nodes with the tag amenity=school and Distrito = Cidade de Tete EP = true ES1 = true ES2 = false Escola = Escola Básica Mateus Sansão Muthemba Latitude = -16.163611111111098 Longitude = 33.57288... commented 2025-11-26 10:53:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175110636 (Comments: 5) | Auronn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Skasowałem to dziwactwo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175148603 commented 2025-11-26 10:53:06 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 175103391 (Comments: 1) | Mariusz 2M (Discussed changesets: 48) | 1. Niepotrzebny area=yes dla budynku. 2. "Światowida w budowie"? Jest ul. Światowida, nie dałeś jakichś znaków jej "budowy", oznaczyłeś za to dalej opisywany przeze mnie budynek przy inwestycji ŚwiatoVida (mapowa... commented 2025-11-26 10:47:51 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 175047566 (Comments: 1) | Tatrafan_2050 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Tatrafan_2050, ich hatte erst vor kurzem bei den teilAuto-Stellplätzen den Operator von "Mobility Center GmbH" auf "teilAuto eG" geändert, da es bei teilAuto eine Änderung der Geschäftsform gab. Deine... commented 2025-11-26 10:37:16 UTC by scai ♦278 |
| 167754301 (Comments: 14) | Stone_X (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zresztą z punktu widzenia użytkownika lasu nie musi mieć dla mnie znaczenia przebieg relacji danego dojazdu pożarowego - takowe się krzyżują ze sobą i mając nazwy odcinków na mapie nie martwię się też, że aplikacja mogła by w bł... commented 2025-11-26 10:31:09 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 173853598 (Comments: 3) | Panio (Discussed changesets: 5) | The uncertainty over the alignment is being discussed at: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/greek-route-numbers/135698/17 commented 2025-11-26 10:30:31 UTC by ika-chan! ♦309 |
| 175142855 (Comments: 3) | wborn (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yep .. gewoon verwijderen.. ook de adresnodes. Dan teken je een vlak landuse=greenfield over dit gebied. Dat is de tag voor 'hier gaat gebouwd worden'.. Wanneer de bouw echt gestart wordt en de heipalen de grond in gaan dan verander je... commented 2025-11-26 10:20:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 173207947 (Comments: 1) | mat (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bonjour, j'ai retiré oneway:bicycle = no car les cyclistes circule dans les deux sens sur la voie juste à coté. commented 2025-11-26 10:19:54 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦182 |
| 175146582 (Comments: 1) | Stockbaard (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Stockbaard, Wanneer dit stukje is opgeleverd dan kunnen de woningen van construction af en de landuse = residential kan aangepast worden. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 10:13:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175143164 (Comments: 2) | DAMI DOMO (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-26 10:00:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175145726 (Comments: 2) | arjavaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | excuses Het klopt nu wel. commented 2025-11-26 09:58:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175124402 (Comments: 1) | TRS Wireless (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-11-26 09:54:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175124822 (Comments: 1) | TRS Wireless (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-11-26 09:54:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 115145652 (Comments: 1) | KDTW Flyer (Discussed changesets: 10) | hey man, the proposed cycleway from your source ( https://wisconsindot.gov/Documents/projects/by-region/ne/76out21/76alt1e5.pdf ) will be only to Glen Valley Rd. and not to Everglade Road, Can you fix it ? ty commented 2025-11-26 09:51:05 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦138 |
| 175144946 (Comments: 1) | Lumina Deco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dlaczego punkt został dodany niezgodnie z wprowadzonym adresem? Co też oznaczają "Lampy" jako źródło tej informacji? OpenStreetMap nie służy reklamowaniu swojej działalności, a obiektywnemu prezentowaniu obiektó... commented 2025-11-26 09:49:10 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 175142607 (Comments: 3) | Rob Juffermans (Discussed changesets: 1) | dat is correct. Patio is de huidige naam commented 2025-11-26 09:47:33 UTC by Rob Juffermans ♦1 |
| 153462812 (Comments: 2) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 23) | Merci je n'avais pas en tête ce tag ! commented 2025-11-26 09:46:56 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦182 |
| 175143806 (Comments: 2) | DWE Nieuwbouw Makelaars (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWE, Het gebouw heb ik voorlopig verwijderd. Het 'bouwterrein' als greenfield getagd. Zodra de bouw gestart is kun je om import vragen via het forum. Dan komen de juiste gegevens mee. Er staat nu nog niets. .. alleen bouwvergun... commented 2025-11-26 09:42:10 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174618591 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 38) | Bonjour, certains de vos changeset génèrent des doublons d'adresses comme https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174618591 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158426257 vous pouvez le voir via osmose ht... commented 2025-11-26 09:42:03 UTC by didier2020 ♦95 |
| 175138793 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 121) | Не се дублират, две отделни локации са. И на двете има указания как да се стигне до втората, ако първата е заключена :). commented 2025-11-26 09:41:28 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦744 |
 | 175123954 (Comments: 4) | DodoGTA (Discussed changesets: 9) | Čia stipriai per daug reviewui :-) Taip, situaciją puikiai žinau, ne veltui aš buvau į iD įdėjęs tekstą, kad NIEKADA NEKEISTI. Nes ten beveik nulinis šansas padaryti ką nors naudingo ir didelis šansas prigadinti. commented 2025-11-26 09:26:59 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,000 |
| 175103704 (Comments: 1) | Smogn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Coucou, on évite le docteur dans name Simplement Prénom Nom docteur c'est l'attribut qui le définit #ccbg commented 2025-11-26 09:17:44 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,284 |
| 175111150 (Comments: 1) | Jean-Noël Pédeutour (Discussed changesets: 1) | salut, attention à des noms qui sont descriptifs :) car par exemple si l'on fait une carte dans une autre langue, il est difficile de faire apparaître un nom autre que Maison de santé, si c'est écrit dessus cel... commented 2025-11-26 09:16:36 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,284 |
| 175104697 (Comments: 1) | Smogn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, c'est l'arrêt de bus qui a été transformé en foodtruck ? il n'y a plus d'arrêt de bus ? commented 2025-11-26 09:13:18 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,284 |
| 168839001 (Comments: 1) | Harshavardhan200 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Harshavardhan200, For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387989946 name change of Krishnakiri- Madanapalle to Gudlakadirepalle is not meaningful and does not seem to have any basis. This will be considered a vandalism. --- ... commented 2025-11-26 09:08:12 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175140306 (Comments: 1) | DrorHarari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Dror! Thank you for the contribution and welcome to OSM. The street changes look good to me. Have a look at the basic guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel The page also shows various ways of communicating... commented 2025-11-26 09:02:05 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦676 |
| 120391903 (Comments: 5) | Gianfranco De Rose (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ha ragione ho controllato le curve DEM e rispetto alla mappa sopra indicata ci sono quai 200 m di dislivelo,, La quota DEM stimata è 1564, il picco montuoso che in realta e una cresta c e se apri con google map questa coordinate e quel... commented 2025-11-26 08:57:39 UTC by Gianfranco De Rose ♦5 |
| 139525465 (Comments: 2) | John Stanworth (Discussed changesets: 43) | Good to hear from you Paul. Hope your mapping is still going well. Not a clue about the AED I’m afraid. That changeset was 2 years ago. I’ve mapped many hundreds of them since then and can barely remember ones I mapped last week 😄 C... commented 2025-11-26 08:57:09 UTC by John Stanworth ♦25 |
| 174599947 (Comments: 2) | yswa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, actually, I didn't fill in that information, I'll add it! (Nice your OSM SVG and 3D map project !) commented 2025-11-26 08:56:31 UTC by yswa ♦1 |
| 173856160 (Comments: 13) | bentzy (Discussed changesets: 32) | רואים בדיון שיש הסכמה מאוד רחבה שזאת לא סיבה מספיק טובה לשים את זה בשם, ושאולי זאת סיבה להמציא תגית חדשה מתאימה לתיאור קצר. commented 2025-11-26 08:55:01 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦676 |
| 174507809 (Comments: 5) | rskedgell_import (Discussed changesets: 3) | Another mystery solved! commented 2025-11-26 08:45:07 UTC by spiregrain ♦219 |
| 173352346 (Comments: 6) | Xelote (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci beaucoup! Je vais tester avec les autres relations à réparer. commented 2025-11-26 08:44:44 UTC by Xelote ♦1 |
| 171806277 (Comments: 2) | Zilvervisje (Discussed changesets: 25) | Heb ze als disused:highway=path getagd als aanwijzing voor medemappers. commented 2025-11-26 08:35:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 164414274 (Comments: 2) | Davide M87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok, cambio il tag commented 2025-11-26 08:23:34 UTC by Davide M87 ♦1 |
| 175118048 (Comments: 1) | Xelote (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je vois que vous avez corrigé également la relation TER Citi Rouen Paris Saint-Lazare : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5512015 Je ne corrige pas les segments car vous voulez tester JOSM ... Ajoutez un commentaire si vous ... commented 2025-11-26 08:12:45 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 175098829 (Comments: 1) | applecuckoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | note: I wrote Whitford when I really meant Somerville, lol commented 2025-11-26 07:52:41 UTC by applecuckoo ♦2 |
| 114486821 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 308) | Hi, Creamery: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9306565696/history#map=19/52.340523/-8.856517 has a fixme. On Bing Streetside, the building looks very 1950s-60s century, but that might be alterations, not the original structure. The west end ... commented 2025-11-26 07:52:01 UTC by VictorIE ♦969 |
| 153799775 (Comments: 2) | Jose Riha (Discussed changesets: 75) | dobry, ak ma pamat neklame, tak to bolo na infotabuli pri vchode do arealu. commented 2025-11-26 07:51:25 UTC by Jose Riha ♦194 |
| 175125112 (Comments: 1) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 145) | *offset is -2.92; -2.02 commented 2025-11-26 07:49:26 UTC by damianeue ♦116 |
| 175113830 (Comments: 2) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 70) | @the_third_man i deleted the defi because abandoned seems not right to me. commented 2025-11-26 07:40:07 UTC by chnuessli ♦111 |
| 174930958 (Comments: 1) | TEST1357 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140495 commented 2025-11-26 07:33:10 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 174932201 (Comments: 1) | TEST1357 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140484 commented 2025-11-26 07:32:53 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 175047667 (Comments: 1) | TEST1357 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140475 commented 2025-11-26 07:32:34 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 175132093 (Comments: 1) | Fatbike Company (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw wijziging. Ik heb adresnode 83a teruggeplaatst. Die was ergens anders terecht gekomen. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-26 07:30:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175132647 (Comments: 1) | kye7790 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140349 commented 2025-11-26 07:27:26 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 175134674 (Comments: 1) | 김제송신소 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140144 commented 2025-11-26 07:20:08 UTC by KennyDap ♦13 |
| 174626219 (Comments: 2) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174681624 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174647945 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174624721 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174664553 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174664993 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174530285 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174667011 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174694805 (Comments: 2) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174456956 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174452254 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174457323 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174468415 (Comments: 2) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174473630 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174475755 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174520385 (Comments: 2) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174520864 (Comments: 2) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174528713 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174437070 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174437622 (Comments: 1) | hasancelikbilek35 (Discussed changesets: 25) | DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043 commented 2025-11-26 07:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175105816 (Comments: 2) | GercoKees (Discussed changesets: 7) | ja, je hebt gelijk, ik dacht daar laatst ook al aan, maar wist niet goed wat gebruikelijk is. dus: dank voor je opmerking, commented 2025-11-26 07:08:10 UTC by GercoKees ♦6 |
| 174999919 (Comments: 1) | Harshavardhan2000A (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Harshavardhan2000A, Your mapping is introducing errors. For example for the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452929446 You seem to have approximately located the road joining 16.5453312, 81.7035984 and 16.5453192, 81.7053123, as it c... commented 2025-11-26 07:04:34 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175105562 (Comments: 1) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 8) | When drawing outlines that should have 90-degree corners, you can use the "square corners" button in the editor (q) to prettify the areas. commented 2025-11-26 06:58:51 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦144 |
| 175128245 (Comments: 6) | Jelv (Discussed changesets: 2) | .. en anders een vraagje voor het forum.. Draadje korte vragen korte antwoorden. commented 2025-11-26 06:56:02 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175065204 (Comments: 3) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 11) | “Hi user_5589 and Cebderby, Thank you for getting in touch and reverting the changeset. Your comments are duly noted. My intention is to collaborate constructively and avoid any future conflict. Thank you for your understanding.” commented 2025-11-26 06:19:14 UTC by World_Winner ♦9 |
| 175137960 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19029 commented 2025-11-26 06:07:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174629526 (Comments: 2) | Tyson Springett (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplicate has been removed commented 2025-11-26 06:05:36 UTC by nevw ♦2,084 |
| 174851618 (Comments: 5) | arjunaraoc (Discussed changesets: 14) | I have cleaned up. commented 2025-11-26 05:59:32 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦598 |
| 175123963 (Comments: 1) | ㄱㄴㄹ (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19025 commented 2025-11-26 05:55:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175136362 (Comments: 1) | 연꽃사랑 (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19026 commented 2025-11-26 05:54:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175047648 (Comments: 1) | adwawd (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19027 commented 2025-11-26 05:52:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175133745 (Comments: 1) | LEEBC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19028 commented 2025-11-26 05:51:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174369997 (Comments: 3) | Keith Barnett (Discussed changesets: 3) | Great, I've now updated to use the standard semicolon for the separator of multiple numbers and added the +44 country code commented 2025-11-26 05:33:15 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦347 |
| 161482235 (Comments: 1) | GerdP (Discussed changesets: 179) | Radtour war am 17.1.2025 commented 2025-11-26 05:20:06 UTC by GerdP ♦2,793 |
| 175134747 (Comments: 1) | Dxnz090 (Discussed changesets: 1) | this alpr is in the middle of the road, please check its actual position and fix it. commented 2025-11-26 04:29:30 UTC by Udarian ♦536 |
| 110846407 (Comments: 1) | TagaSanPedroAko (Discussed changesets: 327) | Hi there I know this is 4 years old but I was working in the area and just wanted to just leave a comment here to point out my disagreement with the naming decision on this changeset. While I agree in principle with the concept of alining roa... commented 2025-11-26 04:22:45 UTC by 022 ♦26 |
| 152674894 (Comments: 4) | Yitzchak M (Discussed changesets: 33) | My mistake. The inference came from the IHM Legend which shows that a Vehicle Block must be barrier=block or motor_vehicle=no. The implication being that barrier=block precludes a vehicle from passing so no "motor_vehicle=no" is necessary. ... commented 2025-11-26 04:08:18 UTC by Yitzchak M ♦53 |
| 175133382 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135905 commented 2025-11-26 03:33:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175133389 (Comments: 2) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135905 commented 2025-11-26 03:33:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175133369 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135905 commented 2025-11-26 03:33:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175133362 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135905 commented 2025-11-26 03:33:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175052824 (Comments: 1) | MinchulKKK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19024 commented 2025-11-26 03:21:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175133331 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135585 commented 2025-11-26 03:14:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175133352 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135585 commented 2025-11-26 03:14:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175133225 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135585 commented 2025-11-26 03:14:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175096826 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135585 commented 2025-11-26 03:14:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175133235 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135585 commented 2025-11-26 03:14:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175095659 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135585 commented 2025-11-26 03:14:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175096548 (Comments: 1) | 이준원 (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135585 commented 2025-11-26 03:14:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175101575 (Comments: 1) | vrg (Discussed changesets: 20) | Czy to jest oficjalna nazwa drogi ? Czy przypadkiem nie jest to nazwa inwestycji? Jeśli droga nie ma nazwy, nie nazywamy jej. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy Na mapie dróg w geoportalu ta droga nie ma nazwy. commented 2025-11-26 02:57:00 UTC by olo81 ♦693 |
| 175098451 (Comments: 1) | 하지성 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19022 commented 2025-11-26 02:55:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174843417 (Comments: 1) | 김길동 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19021 commented 2025-11-26 02:49:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174838766 (Comments: 1) | zackey0701 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19020 commented 2025-11-26 02:42:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175091665 (Comments: 1) | 정윤선 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19019 commented 2025-11-26 02:36:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 137969712 (Comments: 1) | Neko the gamer (Discussed changesets: 9) | Il negozio di sport e abbigliamento sembra essere taggato correttamente se ha vestiti "sportivi" e costumi. commented 2025-11-26 01:43:05 UTC by realjep ♦21 |
| 175065859 (Comments: 6) | LEA SYSTEMS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich habe den Eindruck, dass die Bubatzkarte auch einen roten Fleck um leisure=horse_riding macht (wie bei pitch); Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/52.6277/13.3673&layers=PN https://bubatzkarte.de/#16/52.6277/13.3673 Wenn d... commented 2025-11-26 01:39:57 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦850 |
| 175132977 (Comments: 1) | jimmyjamjar10101 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, In this situation the crossing tag should have been removed rather than the node itself as it was part of a building way. I've restored the building geometry in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175133725 commented 2025-11-26 01:03:14 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦73 |
| 175090738 (Comments: 6) | JBogatka (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hab zumindest die shared nodes jetzt erstmal behoben. In JOSM geht dafür folgender Suchbegriff wunderbar: type:node child (id:1453469363) ways:2- wobei die Id dem Way entspricht den man "aufräumen" möchte. Mit... commented 2025-11-26 00:17:35 UTC by JBogatka ♦6 |
| 174990922 (Comments: 1) | Umut Arda Ararat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Lütfen birden fazla ili kapsayan değişiklikleri tek seferde yapmayınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2025-11-26 00:16:01 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦172 |
| 156814934 (Comments: 1) | ketms (Discussed changesets: 1) | O que é esta numeração? commented 2025-11-26 00:01:05 UTC by AjBelnuovo ♦109 |
| 174979966 (Comments: 1) | ilayda aydinlatma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Değişiklik açıklamanıza "Konumumuzda mağaza ismi çıkmıyor. Lütfen düzeltmemize yardımcı olunuz..." yazmışsınız. OpenStreetMap'te herhangi bir sorun yok. Mağazanızı 20 gün önce ... commented 2025-11-25 23:51:51 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦172 |
| 125898429 (Comments: 1) | Fabe56 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Un beau clin d'oeil. Je vois ces deux panneaux près de l'écluse mis en évidence sur la carte https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-vector-web-display commented 2025-11-25 23:36:53 UTC by PierZen ♦276 |
| 174971180 (Comments: 3) | Cebderby (Discussed changesets: 45) | Relations are very commonly used to structure bus routes, rail networks and cycle networks. How are these so different from the UK power network? Of course I would not expect to single handedly map it in it's entirety, but neither would an... commented 2025-11-25 23:22:02 UTC by UtterClutter ♦40 |
| 174832558 (Comments: 1) | AlwaysRJS (Discussed changesets: 10) | For the 'Roller Haven', there are trail closed signs at the northern end, and it looks like the park does not want people to use that trail, and is trying to restore that section of forest commented 2025-11-25 23:20:03 UTC by matthewfecica ♦7 |
| 175125231 (Comments: 2) | ejderuby (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.amctheatres.com/movie-theatres/bloomington-in/amc-classic-columbus-12 Are they not allowed if that's the name of the location? commented 2025-11-25 23:16:24 UTC by ejderuby ♦3 |
| 174959517 (Comments: 1) | Corey F Hammond (Discussed changesets: 1) | its actually getting renamed soon.. otherwise thanks for pointing it out! commented 2025-11-25 22:59:36 UTC by ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist ♦11 |
| 175080037 (Comments: 2) | Oviedo1997 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola, tienes razón. Pensé que sería la continuación de Mateo Llana porque lo vi en un mapa del ayuntamiento, pero consultando el catastro pertenece a Carlos Casanueva. Disculpa las molestias commented 2025-11-25 22:50:34 UTC by Oviedo1997 ♦4 |
| 175127497 (Comments: 1) | donux-nl (Discussed changesets: 41) | review_requested \tyes Lijkt me allemaal oke. Gt eggie commented 2025-11-25 22:44:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175121824 (Comments: 1) | Doctore24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-25 22:30:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 167348814 (Comments: 2) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Je remarique que je n’avais pas répondu. Merci pour la correction ! commented 2025-11-25 22:26:24 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦39 |
| 175127541 (Comments: 3) | resitive (Discussed changesets: 6) | De naam zal straks op de adresnode renderen. CTRL-f5 om effect te zien. Gr eggie commented 2025-11-25 21:55:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175116261 (Comments: 1) | Artifex Fysiotherapie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alle info verplaatst naar adresnode. Artifex is immers niet de gebouwnaam. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-25 21:52:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175108535 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:52:03 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175109046 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:51:46 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175109204 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:51:27 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175109250 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:51:15 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175109423 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:51:00 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175112139 (Comments: 3) | OgrodniakPL (Discussed changesets: 1) | W ogóle czemu ta pinezka jest dodana tak daleko od właściwej lokalizacji? Przecież to nie jest w ogóle ten adres commented 2025-11-25 21:50:58 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175109454 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:50:50 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175109837 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:50:38 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175109872 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:50:27 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175110065 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:50:00 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175110127 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:49:47 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175110241 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:49:37 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175110277 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REV... commented 2025-11-25 21:49:12 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175114113 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-25 21:48:39 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175114315 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-25 21:48:22 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175116583 (Comments: 1) | Artifex Fysiotherapie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi, de info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. Liever niet de gebouwomtrek gebruiken. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-25 21:48:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175114954 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-25 21:48:09 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175115518 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-25 21:47:55 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175116522 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-25 21:47:43 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175116638 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-25 21:47:07 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175119760 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "City Pole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175119760 commented 2025-11-25 21:46:08 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175119892 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "City Pole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175119892 commented 2025-11-25 21:44:28 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175127111 (Comments: 3) | Magicsportcamp (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-25 21:44:25 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175075073 (Comments: 5) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 119) | Thanks for the heads-up. I hadn’t realized, lesson learned. I’ve rolled back four tags. commented 2025-11-25 21:42:51 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
| 175120526 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "City Pole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175120526 commented 2025-11-25 21:42:46 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175002422 (Comments: 3) | drittel-matzos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Du hast nicht den Gebäudeumriss dupliziert, nur die Addressdaten, die seit 5 Jahren bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3230107411/history/ sind auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316830017/history/ verdoppelt. :) commented 2025-11-25 21:41:21 UTC by habi ♦1,973 |
| 175121405 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-11-25 21:40:42 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175122671 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. There are at least 3 camera nodes overlapping each other. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... commented 2025-11-25 21:39:15 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175122677 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175122677 commented 2025-11-25 21:38:16 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175123293 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123293 commented 2025-11-25 21:38:00 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175123391 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123391 commented 2025-11-25 21:37:50 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175123409 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123409 commented 2025-11-25 21:37:38 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175123492 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123492 commented 2025-11-25 21:37:28 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175123496 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123496 commented 2025-11-25 21:37:16 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175127857 (Comments: 2) | resitive (Discussed changesets: 6) | Info verplaatst naar bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-25 21:36:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175123525 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123525 commented 2025-11-25 21:36:27 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175123640 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123640 commented 2025-11-25 21:35:56 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175123670 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123670 commented 2025-11-25 21:35:45 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175123951 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175123951 commented 2025-11-25 21:35:32 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175120335 (Comments: 1) | Ankara Bel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Selam. Aynı yolu 2 gün önce de değiştirmişsiniz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175039821 O değişikliğinize yazılan yoruma cevap vermemişsiniz. Önceki değişikliğinizin açıklamasına "sınırlara... commented 2025-11-25 21:35:15 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦172 |
| 175124106 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175124106 commented 2025-11-25 21:35:08 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175124124 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175124124 commented 2025-11-25 21:34:56 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175124424 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. There are at least 2 camera nodes on top of each other. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2025-11-25 21:34:43 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175124426 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175124426 commented 2025-11-25 21:34:24 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175124441 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175124441 commented 2025-11-25 21:33:50 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175113435 (Comments: 1) | Lubelska Laweta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opis zestawu zmian nie służy do reklamowania swoich usług - OpenStreetMap nie jest do reklamowania (osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian) commented 2025-11-25 21:33:34 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175125426 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. There are at least 2 camera nodes on top of each other. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2025-11-25 21:33:32 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175125430 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175125430 commented 2025-11-25 21:33:07 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175125573 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175125573 commented 2025-11-25 21:32:36 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175126569 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. There are at least 2 camera nodes on top of each other. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2025-11-25 21:32:02 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175126578 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126578 commented 2025-11-25 21:31:29 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175111296 (Comments: 1) | Pixel Studio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opis został usunięty - OpenStreetMap to nie miejsce do reklamowania swoich usług commented 2025-11-25 21:31:21 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175126640 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. There are at least 2 camera nodes on top of each other. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2025-11-25 21:31:11 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175045847 (Comments: 3) | archer24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for your feedback. You are correct, they are riding arenas. I have corrected the tags for them. commented 2025-11-25 21:31:10 UTC by archer24 ♦1 |
| 175126652 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126652 commented 2025-11-25 21:30:45 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175126788 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. There are at least 3 camera nodes overlapping each other. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... commented 2025-11-25 21:26:29 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175126799 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126799 commented 2025-11-25 21:25:59 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175126801 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126801 commented 2025-11-25 21:25:08 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175126980 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. There are at least 2 camera nodes overlapping each other. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... commented 2025-11-25 21:24:42 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175126986 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126986 commented 2025-11-25 21:23:05 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175127066 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. There are 3 camera nodes overlapping each other. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/17512706... commented 2025-11-25 21:22:41 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175127068 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127068 commented 2025-11-25 21:21:05 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175127086 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127086 commented 2025-11-25 21:20:31 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175116431 (Comments: 2) | manuel197 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Comentar que realicé algunas modificaciones al respecto de lo anterior. El nodo, la relación y su área del barrio Girasoles, los agregué con el ciclo vital "proposed" e iré revisando y actualizando ... commented 2025-11-25 21:20:20 UTC by mweper ♦432 |
| 175127594 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127594 commented 2025-11-25 21:19:23 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175110542 (Comments: 1) | not trustable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá. Notei que alteraste a referência da estrada nacional 109 de "EN 109" para "N109". A nomenclatura no OSM segue a estrutura A X, EN X, EM X e CM X. Por favor, evita fazer alterações se n&ati... commented 2025-11-25 21:18:57 UTC by AntMadeira ♦257 |
| 175127605 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127605 commented 2025-11-25 21:18:52 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175128030 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175128030 commented 2025-11-25 21:17:31 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175128365 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | "City pole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175128365 commented 2025-11-25 21:16:12 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,450 |
| 175095919 (Comments: 1) | Walchenbach (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: when adding a gate, just add a node to the street. That will tell routers that there is a gate in the path. I went ahead and fixed it as well as update street names based on the counties parcel map. --- ... commented 2025-11-25 21:15:50 UTC by Glassman ♦5,634 |
| 175047509 (Comments: 3) | David Reik (Discussed changesets: 26) | Well the problem here is that you are "tagging for renderer". You are bending the established rules of mapping so that something appears on a particular map. Route relations are used for marked trail, not just for any path in a forest.<... commented 2025-11-25 21:14:16 UTC by Mashin ♦584 |
| 175125858 (Comments: 6) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 171) | Za trudne pytanie zadałeś :D. Ale faktycznie względem drugiej jezdni jest wzdłuż, nie pomyślałem o tym commented 2025-11-25 21:14:07 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 175116843 (Comments: 4) | Artifex Fysiotherapie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Er stond nog een zwembadtag op een node. Die heb ik aangepast naar zwembad. Dat geeft straks het juiste symbool. Dus beide instelling staan nu binnen het gebouw iets uit elkaar. Je kunt evt schuiven met die nodes. Voor effect CTRL-F5 een... commented 2025-11-25 21:02:30 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175002729 (Comments: 2) | drittel-matzos (Discussed changesets: 3) | gerade gecheckt: für Fussgänger plant der Routenplaner korrekt commented 2025-11-25 21:01:22 UTC by drittel-matzos ♦2 |
| 151739610 (Comments: 1) | jeka p (Discussed changesets: 114) | Hallo Jeka, hier tappt man im Dunklen, was von dir dort erfasst worden ist - https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5060627 commented 2025-11-25 20:47:28 UTC by Hungerburg ♦414 |
| 173728733 (Comments: 3) | compass123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi habi, You're absolutely right! Thanks for fixing the mess!! Best, compass123 commented 2025-11-25 20:40:56 UTC by compass123 ♦1 |
| 175083935 (Comments: 3) | MPA25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👌 commented 2025-11-25 20:39:17 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 175107509 (Comments: 1) | Minibig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci pour ces informations. N'hésitez pas à les mettre à jour si jamais quelque chose change. commented 2025-11-25 20:33:14 UTC by sykul ♦72 |
| 159366630 (Comments: 2) | Günter-CW (Discussed changesets: 30) | Auf der Tafel wird in der Tat auf die App "Flora Incognita" hingewiesen, sozusagen als Anregung, sie beim Wandern auf diesem Weg zu benutzen. commented 2025-11-25 20:32:04 UTC by Günter-CW ♦21 |
| 175125956 (Comments: 1) | ejderuby (Discussed changesets: 7) | CAPITAL letters are not allowed. Please revert your edit. commented 2025-11-25 20:22:42 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
| 175125514 (Comments: 1) | ejderuby (Discussed changesets: 7) | CAPITAL letters are not allowed. Please revert your edit. commented 2025-11-25 20:22:30 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
| 175125382 (Comments: 1) | ejderuby (Discussed changesets: 7) | CAPITAL letters are not allowed. Please revert your edit. commented 2025-11-25 20:22:04 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
| 175115904 (Comments: 2) | dav23r (Discussed changesets: 6) | It's a bubbler - fixed here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175126468 thanks commented 2025-11-25 20:10:54 UTC by dav23r ♦4 |
| 165462227 (Comments: 2) | lonvia (Discussed changesets: 14) | Looks like EveryDoor has full lifecycle prefix support since 6.0. Should prevent this in the future. commented 2025-11-25 20:02:04 UTC by lonvia ♦39 |
| 175113283 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | gdzieś ten import był omawiany? https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-tagow-nid-zabytkow/138532 commented 2025-11-25 19:56:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175052572 (Comments: 2) | anszejek (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ups, pomyliłem ze "start_date" - jest OK. commented 2025-11-25 19:52:13 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
| 161312575 (Comments: 1) | Dren ar Frankig (Discussed changesets: 18) | Salut, visiblement tu n'as pas fait ce que tu pensais faire : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1362232#map=5/45.26/12.30 Ka France métropolitaine, c'est plus que Paris et les îlots de la Baie de St-Brieuc, non ? commented 2025-11-25 19:47:07 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 175032997 (Comments: 1) | Decorator1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Tree canopies of individual trees shouldn't be mapped as landuse=forest, use tree nodes instead. Otherwise these edits look good! commented 2025-11-25 19:46:10 UTC by Sakari_N ♦96 |
| 162490001 (Comments: 1) | Jyrtyps (Discussed changesets: 4) | Are you sure this exists? For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359786450/history#map=17/43.429187/-80.431938 Does not appear on any satellite view I could find. commented 2025-11-25 19:39:26 UTC by NewBGoose ♦1 |
| 175121940 (Comments: 1) | CrysMelyn (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks! commented 2025-11-25 19:34:48 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,561 |
| 175121906 (Comments: 1) | SafetyDance (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is pretty close to the center of an intersection. What's the correct location? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175121906 commented 2025-11-25 19:32:09 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,243 |
| 175121968 (Comments: 1) | SafetyDance (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is pretty close to the center of an intersection. What's the correct location? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175121968 commented 2025-11-25 19:32:05 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,243 |
| 175104091 (Comments: 1) | silat (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ale tu nie ma żadnych strzałek, to po co ten tag? Nie dajemy turn:lanes, tam gdzie nie są narysowane zgodnie z wiki. Zresztą i tak nie jest zbyt dokładne, bo te dodatkowe pasy zaczynają się nieco wcześniej. commented 2025-11-25 19:31:24 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,185 |
| 175120149 (Comments: 1) | Nemesis143 (Discussed changesets: 3) | great work commented 2025-11-25 19:30:09 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 172893406 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 61) | I believe there are a dozen or so different dialects for Halkomelem and even within the same dialect different native tribes will use different words for the same feature. It's all very complicated and not really well solved at this moment. <... commented 2025-11-25 19:12:35 UTC by eerib ♦212 |
| 175115381 (Comments: 2) | VLD298 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Udarian, Thank you, I will keep this in mind for future edits. Happy mapping to you as well, VLD298 commented 2025-11-25 19:01:16 UTC by VLD298 ♦4 |
| 175100053 (Comments: 4) | pepsi_max2k (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks for the quick reply :) re: levels that clearly is mapping for the renderer and should be avoided. Every "map" makes choices as to what is displayed in what way and thus should not be lied to just to have a certain effec... commented 2025-11-25 18:47:09 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
 | 175119150 (Comments: 1) | Pebimo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi :) here are some helpful wiki entries that concern this edit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate any questions? just ask :) --- ... commented 2025-11-25 18:32:38 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
| 175119501 (Comments: 1) | Pebimo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Pebimo, there are two things I would like you to watch out for: - do NOT connect objects to boundaries like happend here. - please write your comment in the predominant local language or in English. thanks for adding t... commented 2025-11-25 18:30:50 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
| 174980205 (Comments: 4) | granitschädel (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thank you for reverting it. The link to the Wiki is:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk But I couldn't link the mentioned part directly, it is to found in the section „International equivalence“ at „Polan... commented 2025-11-25 18:20:09 UTC by granitschädel ♦19 |
| 175117556 (Comments: 3) | Jaymap5432 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dank je wel Eggie! commented 2025-11-25 18:15:19 UTC by Jaymap5432 ♦3 |
| 172575167 (Comments: 2) | melcomsx (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thankyou for the hint and fixing, I thougth I've have fix it correct commented 2025-11-25 18:13:23 UTC by melcomsx ♦14 |
| 154194962 (Comments: 3) | Giertje64 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik zag (oppervlakkig) dat je ook met De Efteling bezig was. Blijkbaar heb je hobby aan Attractieparken, daarom wilde ik je de kaas niet van het brood eten en het aan joe overlaten. Wat mij betreft probeer je bij alle attracties de juiste attraction-t... commented 2025-11-25 18:03:22 UTC by Op'tRad ♦50 |
| 175110118 (Comments: 1) | Mission Morph (Discussed changesets: 2) | this is a duplicate object as the address was already mapped on DA Beauty Bar commented 2025-11-25 18:01:48 UTC by Udarian ♦536 |
| 170511665 (Comments: 1) | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. ¿Tienes alguna fuente que diga que a la tercera fase del Bulevar se le ha puesto ese nombre? No encuentro nada al respecto en prensa ni en la web del ayuntamiento. commented 2025-11-25 18:01:38 UTC by Johnbo ♦31 |
| 175020475 (Comments: 2) | taxi55 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi mueschel, sorry about, correction done. For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:Maxweight Best regards commented 2025-11-25 17:47:33 UTC by taxi55 ♦6 |
| 174979535 (Comments: 1) | Pepe Sánchez de Wu (Discussed changesets: 9) | Buen día, antes que nada gracias por añadir información a OSM. Tengo una consulta: ¿existe alguna fuente, mapa oficial o reglamentación que nombre como “Av. Virgen del Carmen” a todo el tramo de l... commented 2025-11-25 17:44:56 UTC by SPalferro ♦20 |
| 173412406 (Comments: 1) | MARIUS-FFB (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi MARIUS-FFB, im Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5062808 mein jemand, dass es den KFC (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13239060648) den du vor kurzem eingetragen hast noch gar nicht gibt. Kannst du dir den Hinweis mal anschauen... commented 2025-11-25 17:43:42 UTC by map per ♦1,318 |
| 175058175 (Comments: 2) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 204) | Gerne :) Ich bin die neue Runde gelaufen "Gegen das Vergessen" und hab am Ende den Wegweiser gesehen und mich an deine Notiz erinnert. Wenn du vor dem Tor steht und rechts beim Grüncontainer nach hinten läufst, kommt zuerst ein la... commented 2025-11-25 17:43:25 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 82209978 (Comments: 1) | KlubAnDouarSantel (Discussed changesets: 21) | Salut, il y a comme un copier/coller sur le name de Bae Din ;-). https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5686106150 commented 2025-11-25 17:39:05 UTC by trial ♦986 |
| 175023738 (Comments: 2) | CopperOppositeKindred (Discussed changesets: 6) | javítva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175120237 commented 2025-11-25 17:16:28 UTC by CopperOppositeKindred ♦7 |
| 132367729 (Comments: 3) | caistk (Discussed changesets: 17) | Obszar Bielan jako część Bydgoszczy włączony w 1876 vide, w przeciwieństwie do pozostałego Okola - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/Bydgoszcz_-_rozw%C3%B3j_terytorialny.png commented 2025-11-25 17:14:13 UTC by caistk ♦8 |
| 80054145 (Comments: 4) | bvarick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good suggestion, I changed it. Feel free to edit as you see fit. commented 2025-11-25 17:13:41 UTC by bvarick ♦1 |
| 174698350 (Comments: 2) | Matthew Larkin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mostly because I'm new to Open Street Maps I suppose 😅 I was mostly opening up areas that intersected with trails, especially overlooks (to assist apps that do auto-routing). I just happened to see horses were "allowed" so I figured... commented 2025-11-25 17:12:24 UTC by Matthew Larkin ♦1 |
| 165906407 (Comments: 3) | habi (Discussed changesets: 403) | Ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175119682 das Stückli beim Kreisel an der Länggassstrasse angepasst und beim P+R Neufeld ein neues kleines Stückli hinzugefügt. Das sollte den 'Verbindungscharakter'... commented 2025-11-25 17:03:30 UTC by habi ♦1,973 |
| 161401502 (Comments: 2) | Unarmored5156 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Unarmored5156, I happened to make some changes yesterday to bus route 10, and I noticed but did not address the fixme notes you added here. Can I ask what exactly you believe is wrong about the start & end points of the 'inb... commented 2025-11-25 17:00:39 UTC by hoserab ♦210 |
| 175114438 (Comments: 6) | fallinganvil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tagging aangepast en samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout Groet, eggoe commented 2025-11-25 16:57:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 162247310 (Comments: 3) | habi (Discussed changesets: 403) | Ah, du meinst https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118859710, sorry. Da habe ich die exklusive Velospur neben der Geradeaus-Autospur anhand https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle:lanes erfasst und mich wohl schlichtwegs in den `lanes` ve... commented 2025-11-25 16:52:46 UTC by habi ♦1,973 |
| 175081404 (Comments: 1) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 28) | motor_vehicle=no is in dit geval niet correct. Er staat richting de Enschedesestraat een NL:C12 bord, wat verboden voor motorvoertuigen betekent. Hier vallen in NL mofa en moped niet onder. In OSM vallen deze wel onder motor_vehicle. (zie ook https:/... commented 2025-11-25 16:49:33 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦30 |
| 175087861 (Comments: 2) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello oba510, I understand your point. I have restored these to their original classification of highway=footway in changeset 175118961. Thank you and have a good day! VLD318 / Owen commented 2025-11-25 16:48:52 UTC by VLD318 ♦8 |
| 174917825 (Comments: 2) | KangtoMountain (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Zh9567, thank you for reaching out, I will change this to trunk and defer to your knowledge. commented 2025-11-25 16:44:13 UTC by KangtoMountain ♦2 |
| 175082248 (Comments: 2) | VLD323 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Baloo Uriza, I apologize for the mistake - I must have missed those signals in the imagery. Thank you for correcting the tags. VLD323 commented 2025-11-25 16:37:05 UTC by VLD323 ♦1 |
| 163145319 (Comments: 2) | jtracey (Discussed changesets: 57) | Thank you for your work sorting out the mess here! I have also seen bad edits from that editor unfortunately. Thanks for your efforts. commented 2025-11-25 16:35:28 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦335 |
| 175118182 (Comments: 1) | wborn (Discussed changesets: 5) | Lijkt me prima... Ik heb je info wel samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Wanneer de naam niet tevoorschijn komt kun je het beste de poi schuiven naar een beetje lege plekm want die adresnodes zitten denk ik in de weg. Mapse eggie commented 2025-11-25 16:32:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175020684 (Comments: 1) | Александр Старовойтов (Discussed changesets: 2) | В теге name в OSM указываются только имена собственные (за исключением строящихся объектов). Описания можно писать в теге description. Высоты ... commented 2025-11-25 16:31:23 UTC by fndoder ♦103 |
| 170053458 (Comments: 3) | Thosewhoknow (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ignore my last comment; I was looking at the wrong road. commented 2025-11-25 16:28:59 UTC by Thosewhoknow ♦5 |
| 175117398 (Comments: 2) | wborn (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ik heb wat meer details toegevoegd in een nieuwe changeset, ik hoop dat het nu nog beter is. commented 2025-11-25 16:26:32 UTC by wborn ♦3 |
| 175020380 (Comments: 1) | Александр Старовойтов (Discussed changesets: 2) | Нет, здание было указано правильно. Данный жилой комплекс состоит из стилобата (на крыше которого находится двор) и высотных корпусов. ... commented 2025-11-25 16:26:10 UTC by fndoder ♦103 |
| 175116921 (Comments: 2) | wborn (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dankjewel! Ik leer een hoop. :-) commented 2025-11-25 16:17:39 UTC by wborn ♦3 |
| 174881913 (Comments: 1) | Rivka Schafer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not map parked trucks as buildings. You can identify them easely by their form Narrow rectangular with white cabin mostly Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-11-25 16:10:43 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 174857178 (Comments: 6) | NBB-MA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich bin jetzt im Kontakt mit der zuständigen Person bei NBB. Es besteht der Verdacht, dass einige unserer Daten unzulässig aus deren Leitungsinformationssystem übernommen sind. Wenn sich das als zutreffend herausstellt (und der/die Ori... commented 2025-11-25 16:09:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,487 |
| 175065904 (Comments: 1) | Jacob Finch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Many thanks for spotting and fixing this. An armchair mapper based outside the UK introduced this error ~7 months ago and it should have been spotted much sooner. commented 2025-11-25 16:05:23 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,664 |
| 175116098 (Comments: 1) | Artur Wierniewski (Discussed changesets: 30) | Gdzie te budowane obszary? Któryś raz widzę ten niepotrzebny dopisek. Zwracaj uwagę na treść podpowiadanych opisów zmian. Zawsze lepiej więcej tekstu od ogólników, ale ważne, by był zgodny z wprowadzonymi zmianami. commented 2025-11-25 16:01:46 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 165567510 (Comments: 1) | UnusualWorld (Discussed changesets: 8) | No, you caused a unit issue with the speed limit. UK speed limits are in mph and the unit needs to be explicitly specified as OSM's default is kph. commented 2025-11-25 16:01:42 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,664 |
| 175115480 (Comments: 1) | Artifex Fysiotherapie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Ik heb nog een officetag toegevoegd anders zie je niets op de kaart. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-25 15:54:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 174882326 (Comments: 1) | Rivka Schafer (Discussed changesets: 2) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-11-25 15:51:16 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175115644 (Comments: 1) | VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zie commentaar op je eerste changeset. colour aangepast naar red Alle tagging is in het UK Engels commented 2025-11-25 15:46:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175116310 (Comments: 1) | SemBauke (Discussed changesets: 14) | Had opnieuw intekenen begraafplaats purmerend moeten zijn. commented 2025-11-25 15:39:46 UTC by SemBauke ♦10 |
| 175113674 (Comments: 2) | Augustina Boakye Dankwah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Remove houses with name=House Perhaps a swimming_pool? Greetz, eggie commented 2025-11-25 15:37:40 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175109005 (Comments: 1) | Artur Wierniewski (Discussed changesets: 30) | Nałożyłeś chodniki w kilku miejscach, sprawdź sobie commented 2025-11-25 15:29:35 UTC by Anas masuris ♦148 |
| 175113497 (Comments: 5) | NoorderlichtNL (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127563115#map=18/52.305813/5.045756 Ahh... dat wordt een puzzlestukje hier om dat te laten routeren. Probeer het eens met emergency=yes .. mits dat natuurlijk fysiek mogelijk is. commented 2025-11-25 15:28:46 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175106491 (Comments: 1) | Diego Clemente (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping here. Rather accuate mapped. However, Please do not cluster buildings and tag them as 1 building. Best regards commented 2025-11-25 15:27:17 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 174918742 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Auch hier ist wieder fast alles falsch! commented 2025-11-25 15:21:52 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175113794 (Comments: 1) | Augustina Boakye Dankwah (Discussed changesets: 2) | We gebruiken bij beschrijvingen geen name=House commented 2025-11-25 15:21:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 107784073 (Comments: 2) | Siggimause (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Hauptweserradweg verläuft auf der Ostseite der Weser gegenüber dem Ortsteill Vaake. Die Alternativstrecke auf der Westseite der Weser durch den Ortsteill Vaake. Siehe Radwanderkarte BVA Weserradweg. Grund der Änderung war, daß... commented 2025-11-25 15:18:37 UTC by Siggimause ♦1 |
| 160124678 (Comments: 1) | Baauer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12409143183/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here commented 2025-11-25 15:14:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
 | 149355006 (Comments: 1) | Zarraf Tajwar Adib (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600807516/history are you sure that tidal=yes applies here? commented 2025-11-25 15:12:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 123804591 (Comments: 1) | Thorol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9897332135/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here commented 2025-11-25 15:10:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 157711018 (Comments: 1) | Danfost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12231909174/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here commented 2025-11-25 15:10:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 152479160 (Comments: 1) | Balla188 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11967723669/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here commented 2025-11-25 15:10:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 147624966 (Comments: 1) | Fotoxi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4450449890/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here commented 2025-11-25 15:10:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 130526071 (Comments: 1) | NuMentor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10287936713/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here commented 2025-11-25 15:10:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 173734423 (Comments: 1) | Marguerite1307 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8795119817/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here commented 2025-11-25 15:10:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 150770904 (Comments: 1) | lauthi84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11872743394/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here commented 2025-11-25 15:10:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175113209 (Comments: 1) | NoorderlichtNL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes Is dat hier het geval.. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle... commented 2025-11-25 15:10:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 170302027 (Comments: 1) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11267671875/history has shop = salon that was added in this edit shop=salon ? Is it shop=beauty or shop=hairdresser by any chance? If shop=salon is intentional - what it means? See https://wiki.open... commented 2025-11-25 15:09:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 16855363 (Comments: 1) | SatGarcia (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2376666349/history has shop = salon that was added in this edit shop=salon ? Is it shop=beauty or shop=hairdresser by any chance? If shop=salon is intentional - what it means? See https://wiki.opens... commented 2025-11-25 15:09:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 175099840 (Comments: 1) | ⵉⴳⵉⴷⴰⵔⵏ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you and welcome to OSM! commented 2025-11-25 15:06:11 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175114881 (Comments: 1) | Road Ranger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Additional note: Certain roads inside the villages have been downgraded to alley instead of residential roads due to their narrow widths and some are even too narrow to be considered as normal residential roads. commented 2025-11-25 15:03:51 UTC by Road Ranger ♦2 |
| 174822672 (Comments: 4) | Tristramg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merci pour votre réponse. C'est pour cela que j'ai écrit "il me semble" car je ne suis pas sur du tout. Le segment en question est en un seul morceau et il est impossible de rétablir la continué e... commented 2025-11-25 14:51:37 UTC by michel60 ♦82 |
| 159932216 (Comments: 1) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hast Du die TurnRestrictions wegen dem Poller eingetragen? Falls ja, wird dadurch die Navigation gestört. commented 2025-11-25 14:45:12 UTC by chris66 ♦422 |
| 175101360 (Comments: 1) | Service Infrastructures Enghien (Discussed changesets: 1) | waste_basket ne se trouve jamais sur connecter à un highway mais a coté ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8531553425 commented 2025-11-25 14:44:26 UTC by Jakka ♦1,829 |
| 175054424 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Die Haltestellen sind nicht beleuchtet. Warum erzeugst du überall falsche Daten? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=763042430101561&focus=photo commented 2025-11-25 14:37:31 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175054414 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Werte größtenteils falsch... commented 2025-11-25 14:36:18 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175054415 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Den linksseitigen Radweg hast du komplett unterschlagen. commented 2025-11-25 14:34:22 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175054421 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Keine der Haltestellen hat taktiles Pflaster! Deinstalliere die App bitte, das ist hier nicht hilfreich. commented 2025-11-25 14:33:14 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175082561 (Comments: 2) | nativenolf (Discussed changesets: 1) | It is a monument on the side of Mountain Station Rd. Opposite of the cemetery. commented 2025-11-25 14:30:01 UTC by nativenolf ♦1 |
| 175054442 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hier gibt es kein taktiles Pflaster! https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4213479182220856&focus=photo Bitte stoppe deine Bearbeitungen und lösche die App wieder! Vielen Dank. commented 2025-11-25 14:29:50 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175054441 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hier gibt es keine Insel! https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4213479182220856&focus=photo commented 2025-11-25 14:29:20 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175054443 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Der Übergang ist doch nicht hoch. Wie kommst du darauf? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4213479182220856&focus=photo Deine Mühen in allen Ehren, aber bitte hör wieder auf, mit der App zu arbeiten. Das scheint nichts f&uu... commented 2025-11-25 14:28:29 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 107851017 (Comments: 3) | wohnung058 (Discussed changesets: 9) | then why was it reaching far into the sea? commented 2025-11-25 14:27:22 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 175079363 (Comments: 2) | bklrzn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dziekuje! naniosłem zmiany :) commented 2025-11-25 14:26:51 UTC by bklrzn ♦1 |
| 175081909 (Comments: 3) | beegmail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Done - Problematic were the changes to delete highway tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175081909 But also deletion of zone:traffic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56158659/history Is plain wrong. |
| 174936987 (Comments: 3) | santoshipanwar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. I've combined your trace screnshot with a local visit to add a service road that goes arounds th construction area. It looks to be permanant construction so this should be how this area will look going forward. commented 2025-11-25 14:06:18 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦53 |
| 175103494 (Comments: 3) | Spaarne Tennis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Maakt niet uit.. Het is uiteindelijk gelukt. 😀 commented 2025-11-25 13:53:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 102629314 (Comments: 2) | OT Hossegor (Discussed changesets: 21) | Merci Patchanka, le numéro a bien été mis à jour. Merci pour votre contribution. commented 2025-11-25 13:39:35 UTC by OT Hossegor ♦9 |
| 174968080 (Comments: 5) | Kamerijker (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zo, lit=no overal teruggezet en meer om het geheel consequenter te maken. commented 2025-11-25 13:36:08 UTC by Kamerijker ♦7 |
| 174436738 (Comments: 6) | C-sinensis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, merci ! commented 2025-11-25 13:28:49 UTC by C-sinensis ♦3 |
| 175108147 (Comments: 1) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Groblja u Srpskoj Crnji, dva pravoslavna i staro katoličko commented 2025-11-25 13:27:47 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦9 |
| 175107444 (Comments: 2) | yorusil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay danke sorry da habe ich einen Fehler bei der Auswahl gemacht, eine Frage: ist es möglich über JOSM bestehende Dachformen & Dachfarben von Änderungen auszuschließen? habe bis jetzt leider nichts valides dazu gefunden commented 2025-11-25 12:53:51 UTC by yorusil ♦1 |
| 175092047 (Comments: 2) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 178) | Ich komme drauf weil sich hier das routing geändert hat - möglicherweise weil etwas kaputt gegangen ist: https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=974076,1162137#52.37979,9.00197,15z Rot alt, Grün neu. commented 2025-11-25 12:45:12 UTC by flohoff ♦2,408 |
| 175105991 (Comments: 1) | m_p_13 (Discussed changesets: 153) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1453546275 https://www.ope... commented 2025-11-25 12:41:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 151846702 (Comments: 2) | cartoleo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, merci pour la remarque ! Effectivement j'utilise habituellement le format +33, j'ai dû oublier pour cette fois-là. Bonne journée ! :) commented 2025-11-25 12:30:47 UTC by cartoleo ♦6 |
| 175084374 (Comments: 4) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Staram się teraz zapisywać co chwilę poprawki.... commented 2025-11-25 12:22:25 UTC by WieKo68 ♦162 |
| 175104234 (Comments: 1) | BRW_VRU_PW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-25 12:19:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175106627 (Comments: 1) | Orgel1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Orgel1234, ein access=privat reicht vollkommen für alle Verkehrsarten, dazu braucht es keine Liste aller möglichen Fortbewegungsarten. VG commented 2025-11-25 12:01:39 UTC by pitfire ♦707 |
| 172950731 (Comments: 3) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi StreetSurveyor, Thank you for reviewing the edits and for restoring the previous state of the highway classifications. I would like to clarify that the changes were made based on OSM Wiki guidance related to functional highway classifica... commented 2025-11-25 11:58:21 UTC by rajdhani ♦6 |
| 175106565 (Comments: 1) | Jane Cobell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. However, you overlooked buildings. Vague objects, showing no shadow, are not to be mapped. Do not connect buildings to a highway or other features.... commented 2025-11-25 11:56:13 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175106180 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 171) | The maxweight:conditional tag was wrongfully added to Gawil Avenue and has been removed in changeset 175106276 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175106276 commented 2025-11-25 11:45:02 UTC by TinPetreković ♦186 |
| 106172267 (Comments: 1) | ko4egar_routes (Discussed changesets: 1) | На данный момент дорога с асфальтом не соединена, "доброжелатели" грохнули? Я проезжал по ней в 2013 на велике )) Завтра проеду еще разо... commented 2025-11-25 11:44:56 UTC by skadi ♦14 |
| 174882703 (Comments: 1) | Hadivey M Flores (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you overlooked the round buildings and forgot to square the rectangular buildings. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular build... commented 2025-11-25 11:38:30 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175103721 (Comments: 1) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oke.. maar motor_vehicle =no svp niet op paaltjes taggen. Die regel kan weg . Paaltjes routeren niet voor bv autoverkeer.. wel voor moped en mofa. Dat raakt in de war door motor_vehicle no. Mvg eggie commented 2025-11-25 11:35:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175105601 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 221) | Nota resuelta #5062962 commented 2025-11-25 11:28:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,606 |
| 163323191 (Comments: 2) | melody_Tej (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi aceman44, thank you for making the corrections and clarifications about kapor2 and ZBGIS. I’ll be more aware of the sources you mentioned and other potential imports in my future edits. commented 2025-11-25 11:22:20 UTC by melody_Tej ♦23 |
| 163321255 (Comments: 2) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi aceman44, thank you for making the corrections. I’ll be more aware of the sources you mentioned and other potential imports in my future edits. commented 2025-11-25 11:20:02 UTC by Byenin ♦40 |
| 175105183 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 119) | Malutka zmiana ogrodzenia cmentarza przy Ostroroga 22 zrobiła tak duży bbox. commented 2025-11-25 11:19:33 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 168957466 (Comments: 2) | CudnovatiKljunas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, sorry for the late comment commented 2025-11-25 11:11:41 UTC by CudnovatiKljunas ♦1 |
| 175104575 (Comments: 1) | chris64270 (Discussed changesets: 1) | OUPS dans le rajout du conteneur à piles ... on a également déplacé volontairement le marché sous la halle de la mairie. commented 2025-11-25 11:10:19 UTC by chris64270 ♦1 |
| 175035184 (Comments: 2) | spiregrain (Discussed changesets: 50) | Thanks! I ended up swapping some buildings around and THEN realised that I'd mess up the UPRN sequence, so I created a temporary tag to swap the UPRNs back. That one shouldn't have been uploaded. It's gone now per Changeset 1751047... commented 2025-11-25 11:09:46 UTC by spiregrain ♦219 |
| 174884133 (Comments: 1) | Zoe Stanfill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping To be honest, your mappings are below par. Inaccurately mapped. Not squared. Nodes of buildings connected to eachother. Please improve your mapping skills. Check this webpage to see the modifications I had to make.<... commented 2025-11-25 11:08:05 UTC by Frans S ♦10,097 |
| 175031192 (Comments: 3) | ItsMaverick32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | There over hanging a bit --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175031192 commented 2025-11-25 10:55:38 UTC by ItsMaverick32 ♦1 |
| 175103192 (Comments: 1) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 4) | Gijsbert.. Geef als het kan ook de breedte van zo'n fietspad op. width= ... Daar kan LiveNav ook wat mee. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-25 10:40:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 171904363 (Comments: 2) | lf22music (Discussed changesets: 21) | dołączam się do prośby commented 2025-11-25 10:39:11 UTC by zuicz ♦290 |
| 175102417 (Comments: 1) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 4) | motor_vehicle=no heb ik verwijderd. Wel toevoegen wat de eigenschappen zijn. bollard=removable?? flexible?? Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard MVG eggie commented 2025-11-25 10:38:40 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175054453 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Auch hier: Das ist falsch! commented 2025-11-25 10:37:49 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175101661 (Comments: 1) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Het residential gedeelte staat op motor_vehicle=destination. Als dat zo is zal daar ook emergency=yes op 'moeten... commented 2025-11-25 10:35:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175073594 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Alle Änderungen zurückgesetzt, StreetComplete Frage wurde falsch verstanden. commented 2025-11-25 10:34:11 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 135138042 (Comments: 2) | AlojzT (Discussed changesets: 8) | Den "St. Rupert Pilgerweg" wieder gelöscht, da der Zweig Oberndorf-Bischofshofen nicht beschildert und somit auch nicht nachprüfbar ist. Owner ist weiters nicht mehr aktiv und antwortete nicht auf Nachfragen. commented 2025-11-25 10:31:55 UTC by PPete2 ♦135 |
| 175073616 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327552832 Da ist doch kein Radweg separat von der Fahrbahn... Es tut mir wirklich leid, das so hart zu formulieren, aber du richtest in OpenStreetMap mehr Schaden an, als dass du etwas Hilfreiches beitr&aum... commented 2025-11-25 10:00:30 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
| 175073621 (Comments: 1) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Taktiles Pflaster stimmt hier wieder nicht. commented 2025-11-25 09:58:21 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,972 |
 | 174834443 (Comments: 2) | boocha34 (Discussed changesets: 8) | The section of the road is currently (and has been for months now) undergoing total reconstruction and upgrade. it is still navigable with stop-and-go and temporary detours. commented 2025-11-25 09:47:38 UTC by boocha34 ♦1 |
| 163462351 (Comments: 2) | Pfefferdose (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ausserdem hast Du dabei anscheinend diverse von mir erfasste Marker-Knoten einfach gelöscht. Vermutlich, weil Du den Knoten der Pipeline mit dem Knoten des Marker "vereinigt" hast. Das müsste aus meiner Sicht revertiert werden. commented 2025-11-25 09:44:41 UTC by GerdP ♦2,793 |
| 175089238 (Comments: 2) | Gemirt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Snel gedaan ook; ze openen vandaag. commented 2025-11-25 09:35:19 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦695 |
 | 62813784 (Comments: 1) | Chemicus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Is de naam Bet & Breakfast of Bed & Breakfast? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4421246214/history/3 Ik kan de oorspronkelijke mapper niet bereiken. commented 2025-11-25 09:32:20 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,823 |
| 175091116 (Comments: 1) | BitSuzano (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-11-25 09:22:43 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
 | 175092808 (Comments: 1) | nolash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-11-25 09:22:15 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
| 175098806 (Comments: 1) | Erikswinkels (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Het hoofdgebouw was nog niet ingemeten bij BAGimport Ik heb het uitgelijnd. Wat serviceroads en fietspad toegevoegd M... commented 2025-11-25 09:20:43 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175098717 (Comments: 1) | Spaarne Tennis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Je had nu zelf de naam verwijderd. Die heb ik weer toegevoegd. De naam van de club staat op het vlak (zou ook op een extra node kunnen) en de naam van de tennisschool heb ik van een naam voorzien. operator doet in dit geval niet in de rendering. |
| 175066116 (Comments: 7) | Spaarne Tennis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zal even kijken Ik stuur je nog wel per PB onze welkomstmail. name:nl gebruiken we buiten het Nederlandse taalgebied. Bv name:nl=Londen name=London Ook in Friesland kom je dat tegen. name:en en nl zal ik verwijderd hebben. Kenn... commented 2025-11-25 08:50:42 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175096363 (Comments: 1) | RevsYourHeart (Discussed changesets: 0) | Why did you remove university tag? commented 2025-11-25 08:49:05 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦29 |
| 175067656 (Comments: 1) | VRNHN - Rik (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, Het beste kun je een node gebruiken en dan shop=farm ipv shop=yes Dan krijg je het symbool van een boerderijwinkel. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-25 08:45:10 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 124255962 (Comments: 4) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 134) | Ah, I should have checked there. Indeed, lots of asphalt where I put it as unpaved. I'll fix things & review the rest of the road too. commented 2025-11-25 08:40:20 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,384 |
| 175087738 (Comments: 1) | Peter Newman (Discussed changesets: 10) | review_requested \tyes Hi, Website is okay according wiki. Hi If the bench has an English name it's okay.. If not remove name:en= Greetz, eggie commented 2025-11-25 08:38:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175098876 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 2) | mislabelled source as survey, it was aerial commented 2025-11-25 08:37:02 UTC by synthfi ♦6 |
| 175021646 (Comments: 2) | Gowrie1927 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Bernard, that looks much better. commented 2025-11-25 08:21:37 UTC by Gowrie1927 ♦1 |
| 174956099 (Comments: 2) | achauhan_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Gustav Maps, My name is Amit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for your insights! Agree with you, now I see that there is some kind of construction going on & entrances/exits are not fully built for n... commented 2025-11-25 08:21:16 UTC by achauhan_Lyft ♦3 |
| 175088155 (Comments: 1) | VeeDeeTee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-25 08:20:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175084444 (Comments: 1) | BozkurtCC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo BozkurtCC, willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern. Du hattest bei der Garage den Gebäudetyp von yes auf garages geändert und die Geometrie/Lage des Gebäudes. D... commented 2025-11-25 08:10:45 UTC by tux67 ♦1,998 |
| 174688644 (Comments: 1) | Hutz32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Hutz32 Dein Änderungssatz ergibt Seltsames: Der Dürrngraben verläuft 'zickzack'. Ein Gebäude mit Namen "Hausverwaltung"? Wohl kaum. Der Pfad zwischen Auweg 14 & Rupertusstraße 12 ers... commented 2025-11-25 08:03:52 UTC by kre777 ♦12 |
| 175088619 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Ograniczaj swoje zmiany z NID do mniejszych obszarów. Na każdą robisz tak małą ilość obiektów, że dało by się je robić jeszcze bardziej pojedynczo. Tak to od tygodnia zawalasz m.in. Warszawę niepotrzebnymi jej bboxami, co utr... commented 2025-11-25 07:56:22 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦304 |
| 175094011 (Comments: 1) | Lancaster Plumbing Works (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-11-25 07:46:53 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 121941884 (Comments: 1) | plexi32 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo plexi32, Ich bin über Zugangsberechtigungen gestolpert, die Du eingetragen hattest. "agricultural" ist wohl Kontext, aber nicht für alle Nutzer. Ich habe es gelöscht und bei Fahrzeugen eingetragen. Bitte darauf acht... commented 2025-11-25 07:46:48 UTC by Scout Jens ♦287 |
| 175073231 (Comments: 1) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hallo, akino_germany, die von Dir zur Fläche umgewandelten Haltestellen an der Reuterbergkreuzung verursachen Meldungen in OSMOSE (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476&item=9014&level=1%... commented 2025-11-25 07:42:58 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦135 |
| 164233403 (Comments: 1) | mobileGEO (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hallo, bitte lege keine Duplikate an, das war das geschlossene Geschäft neben der existierenden Pizzeria: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5043328 commented 2025-11-25 07:37:30 UTC by Luzandro ♦950 |
| 165783696 (Comments: 1) | Vinit Sawant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Vinit, thank you for your edit to the Morjim Plateau. There is lot of construction going on destroying the plateau. Very useful to record what is happening. commented 2025-11-25 07:33:14 UTC by PlaneMad ♦452 |
| 175089058 (Comments: 1) | JesusJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You can find a better description at https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:sport. commented 2025-11-25 07:28:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 174771116 (Comments: 1) | CQD35 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi CQD35, this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.86156&lat=48.53236&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicat... commented 2025-11-25 07:07:27 UTC by gscholz ♦2,805 |
 | 175085124 (Comments: 4) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 170) | @dmjab13: In this case, defensible. @Pieter: Thanks for fixing this. commented 2025-11-25 07:05:05 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦695 |
| 175000940 (Comments: 1) | molly7932x (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi molly7932x, this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=36.86849&lat=-1.14127&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&a... commented 2025-11-25 07:02:00 UTC by gscholz ♦2,805 |
 | 175073746 (Comments: 1) | B!gM(ollY sM@ll M0lly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi B!gM(ollY sM@ll M0lly, thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regardng overlapping ways (blue markers) and displaced ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=40.71821&lat=36.49096&zoom=14&... commented 2025-11-25 06:57:55 UTC by gscholz ♦2,805 |
| 175090583 (Comments: 1) | CivicAudit (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi JFinnane, In this changeset, you've added a building and roads that no longer exist. May I ask you to revert the changes? Thanks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171390939 commented 2025-11-25 06:56:12 UTC by toobusytolive ♦2 |
| 175046449 (Comments: 1) | nicolepere (Discussed changesets: 2) | hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el mapa en Bolivia. Creo que estas ediciones son parte de alguna tarea de la U? si es así hay algunas cosas que deben mejorar, porque este mapa lo usa mucha gente y muchas veces las "tareas de... commented 2025-11-25 06:20:34 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,610 |
| 174254644 (Comments: 1) | LMC-2023 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please explain why you are adding non-Malaysian local name places in Pandan Perdana. commented 2025-11-25 05:53:48 UTC by angys ♦385 |
| 175078442 (Comments: 1) | Nikodiseas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you created a lot of new unconnected ways. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-111.38348&lat=46.38349&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1 Please connect them... commented 2025-11-25 05:44:54 UTC by ratrun ♦259 |
 | 175092980 (Comments: 1) | Kodin20 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175094288 where the comment is: "Remove test edits" commented 2025-11-25 05:39:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦359 |
| 175090847 (Comments: 1) | Kodin20 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175094280 where the comment is: "Remove test edits" commented 2025-11-25 05:39:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦359 |
| 172512002 (Comments: 2) | ralley (Discussed changesets: 41) | No exit is a hint to routers, the JOSM validator warns when not added. Connecting highways to areas such as buildings without a node tagged as an exit is also considered bad practice and the JOSM validator will warn for such usage. Validators are ... commented 2025-11-25 05:34:46 UTC by ralley ♦623 |
| 175075789 (Comments: 1) | Luul Solutions (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I noticed that you are adding superfluous new streets with names, although there are already existing roads mapped. Please stop with continuing using this method. You are creating a lot of unconnected new ways! The correct method is to pu... commented 2025-11-25 05:14:54 UTC by ratrun ♦259 |
| 174743959 (Comments: 2) | Jvitegem (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi FIX_ME is a tag I use for internal purposes during an area review process. I didn't intend to upload this tag. That was a mistake. I removed them. commented 2025-11-25 04:51:40 UTC by Jvitegem ♦16 |
| 175086609 (Comments: 1) | River Oak Media (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. I have reviewed your edit and it looks good to me. commented 2025-11-25 04:20:50 UTC by citrula ♦973 |
| 146906212 (Comments: 1) | fumireko (Discussed changesets: 7) | Um filtro, alguns ajustes e boas práticas evitariam esse tipo de sobreposição em importações https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11019230/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17133119/history commented 2025-11-25 02:17:14 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,187 |
| 174923838 (Comments: 3) | Beinardus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ah, I see what you mean. They sell also some other flavors. commented 2025-11-25 01:05:28 UTC by Beinardus ♦4 |
| 175090134 (Comments: 2) | 강태영 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19003 commented 2025-11-25 01:00:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175059656 (Comments: 1) | 강태영 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - incorrect deletion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175090345 commented 2025-11-25 00:58:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 175090077 (Comments: 1) | 강태영 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - incorrect deletion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175090345 commented 2025-11-25 00:58:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,158 |
| 174889868 (Comments: 4) | jakecopp (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hi ArchangelEkim, thanks very much for catching and fixing this. commented 2025-11-25 00:58:05 UTC by jakecopp ♦47 |
| 175089448 (Comments: 1) | Foster7925 (Discussed changesets: 1) | To clarify, this Long John Silvers location closed on April 15th, 2024. Key Cannabis Dispensary has since opened at the location commented 2025-11-25 00:02:38 UTC by Foster7925 ♦1 |
| 174114616 (Comments: 1) | GPMapper (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hi there, I just want to ask you to be careful copying names in from Wikipedia, particularly regarding name:cy. The Welsh Wikipedia uses their own style for place names, which is unofficial and not to be used. Any occurences of "F... commented 2025-11-24 23:57:50 UTC by ceirios ♦72 |
| 175088512 (Comments: 1) | Psztomol (Discussed changesets: 82) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212175337 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-11-24 23:31:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175075414 (Comments: 1) | spam46200 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12685129272 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-11-24 23:23:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 175078933 (Comments: 1) | Gienioochgienio (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-11-24 23:23:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,900 |
| 174415007 (Comments: 1) | joenjoyer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Cześć! Dzięki za dokładne i staranne mapowanie pokrycia terenu i infrastruktury Janowa i okolic. Chciałbym jedynie zarekomendować użycie warstwy "Geoportal 2: Granice działek" przy rysowaniu ogrodzeń. Choć oczywiście wiadomo, że... commented 2025-11-24 23:04:52 UTC by czebureks ♦134 |
| 175059641 (Comments: 1) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 53) | https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lijst_van_hoogste_gebouwen_van_Arnhem en ook zelf inschatten commented 2025-11-24 22:58:11 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 175082893 (Comments: 3) | IreuN (Discussed changesets: 74) | I ewentualnie jakieś drobne inne rzeczy, których nie pamiętam już w momencie wysyłania commented 2025-11-24 22:55:21 UTC by IreuN ♦76 |
| 175083794 (Comments: 1) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 53) | copyrightloze bron moeten vinden! https://www.gelderlander.nl/arnhem/hoog-hoger-hoogst-deze-gebouwen-in-arnhem-staan-in-de-hoog500~a1c2e692/ commented 2025-11-24 22:54:11 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 175083150 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian commented 2025-11-24 22:52:03 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175082602 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian commented 2025-11-24 22:51:45 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175073706 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian commented 2025-11-24 22:51:26 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175059537 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian commented 2025-11-24 22:51:06 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175053485 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Czy mógłbyś podawać opisy zmian? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_... commented 2025-11-24 22:50:41 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175046245 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Czy mógłbyś robić mniejsze zestawy zmian, a nie takie na całą Polskę? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian commented 2025-11-24 22:50:14 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| X | 175086695 (Comments: 2) | yetzt (Discussed changesets: 9) | the edit was accidental, i did not realize the editor "restored" my attempt to correct the opening_hours commented 2025-11-24 22:49:58 UTC by yetzt ♦9 |
| 175045926 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian commented 2025-11-24 22:49:45 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175044312 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian commented 2025-11-24 22:49:26 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175044160 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 437) | * Teatr Capitol jest zabytkiem? Czy budynek? Oba budynki? Budynek teatru został niedawno przebudowany, czy jesteś pewien że to są aktualne dane? * Dodałeś mnóstwo duplikatów tagów, np. do Capitolu dałeś trzy razy to sa... commented 2025-11-24 22:48:54 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175037870 (Comments: 2) | anszejek (Discussed changesets: 6) | Jakie jest źródło tej edycji? Skąd jest zakaz jazdy konno? W jaki sposób budowa przecina ul. Żernicką? Czy Żernicka jest zamknięta? commented 2025-11-24 22:47:53 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 175086835 (Comments: 1) | Koki sir (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset was reverted. Please don't map imaginary tunnels. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175087962 commented 2025-11-24 22:47:13 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175083681 (Comments: 1) | Koki sir (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset was reverted. Please don't map imaginary tunnels. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175087962 commented 2025-11-24 22:47:13 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175083899 (Comments: 1) | Koki sir (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset was reverted. Please don't map imaginary tunnels. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175087962 commented 2025-11-24 22:47:13 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 175056450 (Comments: 1) | Koki sir (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset was reverted. Please don't map imaginary tunnels. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175087962 commented 2025-11-24 22:47:13 UTC by ilias_ ♦368 |
| 64128275 (Comments: 2) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 112) | Sorry, da habe ich den falschen CS kommentiert. Ich wollte zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174963320 etwas beitragen. Falls du etwas dazu beitragen kannst, kommentiere bitte dort. Und ignoriere diesen Kommentar hier. commented 2025-11-24 22:44:45 UTC by george1201 ♦246 |
| 174963320 (Comments: 1) | maction (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hallo maction, bei den Fußballfeldern des ASV Hagsfeld hast du einige Flutlichtmasten eingezeichnet, z.B. osm.org/node/13322682158. Dicht neben diesem Knoten gibt es osm.org/node/6032865453, was wohl ein ebensolches Objekt beschreiben soll. ... commented 2025-11-24 22:41:23 UTC by george1201 ♦246 |
| 175086629 (Comments: 1) | Hlias Fountas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Καλησπέρα σας, καλώς ήρθατε στο OpenStreetMap. Ανήκω στους ... commented 2025-11-24 22:31:17 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦130 |
| 175071785 (Comments: 1) | lawrencebanks (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello! These are not sidewalks. Sidewalks run parallel to a street: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks Happy mapping! commented 2025-11-24 22:25:30 UTC by infeeeee ♦613 |
| 175081462 (Comments: 2) | PBalazsD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ha elolvastad volna Ugron Gáborok wiki oldalát akkor amúgy egyértelmű lenne, mivel ott szerepel ez az infó ráadásul... commented 2025-11-24 22:22:38 UTC by infeeeee ♦613 |
| 175087194 (Comments: 1) | FrankJackLuck (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the edit. As this is a manmade underground reservoir the recommended tagging is man_made=reservoir_covered https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2025-11-24 22:19:29 UTC by w_morland ♦15 |
| 175083236 (Comments: 1) | Zelaznefinanse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opisy zestawów zmian nie służą do reklamowania swoich usług, tylko do opisywania krótko tego co się zrobiło: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-24 22:15:55 UTC by bartgron ♦397 |
| 173717369 (Comments: 1) | Finnbarr (Discussed changesets: 14) | Onko tarpeen merkata lähestulkoon koko Laajasalo puutarhaksi, tuskin on noin suuria yhtenäisiä alueita? commented 2025-11-24 22:14:01 UTC by Muokkaaja ♦19 |
| 174322608 (Comments: 1) | SNT surgeres (Discussed changesets: 6) | This appears to be an empty field. The opening hours are not properly formatted. commented 2025-11-24 21:54:24 UTC by yetzt ♦9 |
| 175079721 (Comments: 1) | Cornix123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to osm! Is there a reason you deleted and then readded buildings? It would be more efficient to simply move the nodes around (: commented 2025-11-24 21:53:05 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 174855610 (Comments: 1) | Gnarly8-Produce9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice! welcome to openstreetmap (: commented 2025-11-24 21:46:56 UTC by Tomas09 ♦65 |
| 175085932 (Comments: 4) | bashville (Discussed changesets: 1) | Apologies for the multiple comments. There was an issue with the connection commented 2025-11-24 21:44:07 UTC by w_morland ♦15 |
| 175067644 (Comments: 1) | Alfiya Tarasenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Alfiya :) Thank you for looking after the OSM data in Greece :) I noticed that you added the transliterated names of some streets in Greece. You could consider adding the transliterated names as "int_name", instead of "name:e... commented 2025-11-24 21:29:34 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦130 |
| 169478994 (Comments: 1) | Silentwriter_15 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, du hast bei Sondershausen viele Wege im Wald als "unpaved" gekennzeichnet und ein check_date für surface eingetragen. Ich war kurz nachher da und viele der Wege sind schon komplett verwachsen, andere schon lange nicht meh... commented 2025-11-24 21:05:07 UTC by Manuel H ♦58 |
| 175081522 (Comments: 1) | Dominik A (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175084262 Viele Grüße commented 2025-11-24 20:57:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,140 |
| 175084262 (Comments: 1) | Dominik A (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Zu der Ergänzung der Nennweiten habe ich keine Ergänzungen, das sieht gut aus. Nur ein Hinweis, der eigentlich deinen &bdqu... commented 2025-11-24 20:56:49 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,140 |
| 175043940 (Comments: 5) | Mathi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Wenn da jetzt Poller stehen ist as keine strassenbrücke mehr. commented 2025-11-24 20:43:49 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,440 |
| 175072641 (Comments: 1) | Jadelaks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-24 20:41:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 135662413 (Comments: 3) | igi77 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ho corretto; in ogni caso, su alcune targhe agli angoli delle strade (quelle su cui è riportato anche il nome), il nome è indicato con la enne. commented 2025-11-24 20:35:54 UTC by igi77 ♦6 |
| 174923897 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 443) | Bonjour. Je vois que vous avez changé le SIRET de cet établissement il y a 4 jours, mais celui que vous avez entré (81183444900019) est erroné. Il correspond à un établissement de la même entreprise, ma... commented 2025-11-24 20:31:12 UTC by Bauxite ♦2 |
| 165332279 (Comments: 1) | Farbstich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, bitte access-Tags nicht dazu verwenden, um zu kennzeichen, wer einen Weg nutzen kann. Die dienen bis auf ein paar Ausnahmen dazu, zu zeigen, wer legal den Weg nutzen darf. Danke. commented 2025-11-24 20:25:34 UTC by Manuel H ♦58 |
| 168536754 (Comments: 1) | FranJ2M (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12980652670/history has shop = bazar that was added in this edit shop=bazar ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstre... commented 2025-11-24 20:19:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,578 |
| 174917441 (Comments: 5) | eultra (Discussed changesets: 18) | You're more than welcome to, I've got plenty of other things I can edit once réséda is all tagged commented 2025-11-24 20:04:46 UTC by eultra ♦14 |
| 129246717 (Comments: 1) | Bart De Ruytter (Discussed changesets: 8) | hoe importeer je zo'n mapcomplete thema? commented 2025-11-24 19:54:36 UTC by Joske1020 ♦15 |
| 175054537 (Comments: 1) | Lukedelarosa12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. You can press "Q" to square the corners of buildings commented 2025-11-24 19:48:32 UTC by citrula ♦973 |
| 175033507 (Comments: 2) | ahmadmazareisotoodeh (Discussed changesets: 1) | #tapsi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175082690 commented 2025-11-24 19:46:56 UTC by siavash_mohammadi ♦1 |
| 175042381 (Comments: 1) | J Hulten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are there two speed cameras that close together? Also, are they on located on the center of the road as mapped or on the side? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175042381 ... commented 2025-11-24 19:36:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,634 |
| 175073565 (Comments: 1) | ejderuby (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, You can drop legal suffixes like LLC/ Inc./ Corp.). Please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Square-Merchants commented 2025-11-24 19:36:02 UTC by Comino ♦257 |
| 174950999 (Comments: 1) | Udi (Discussed changesets: 10) | שלום אודי אין טעם להוסיף מבנים זמניים למפה. לדעתי יש לבטל את כל העריכה. תודה. commented 2025-11-24 19:29:52 UTC by hatul ♦422 |
| 175066731 (Comments: 2) | VRNHN - Rik (Discussed changesets: 3) | Goede tip, bedankt! commented 2025-11-24 19:27:07 UTC by VRNHN - Rik ♦1 |
| 175034828 (Comments: 2) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Gute Idee. Ich habe den Fußweg an der Scharnhorststraße vervollständigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175081490 commented 2025-11-24 19:15:12 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦38 |
| 175063021 (Comments: 1) | Eskendoerper (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, die Baustelle sollte als landuse=construction erfasst werden. area=yes ist überflüssig. zusätzlich kann dann das Tag construction gesetzt werden. commented 2025-11-24 19:11:49 UTC by jopi56 ♦11 |
| 168751417 (Comments: 1) | AWSpringfields (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, great that you're keeping Springfields up to date. I see that you only added a partial phone number to Craghoppers Outlet here, "01775". Do you have the full number for it? Mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1... commented 2025-11-24 19:10:50 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦347 |
| 174796274 (Comments: 2) | KnuFloh001 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke Wieland für den Hinweis. Ich schau nochmal durch meine CSs und passe es an. VG. commented 2025-11-24 19:04:08 UTC by KnuFloh001 ♦2 |
| 175055885 (Comments: 2) | KellyPruitt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3573420574 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. By the way: There is a difference between a park (leisur... commented 2025-11-24 19:01:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175068186 (Comments: 1) | VRNHN - Rik (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Rik.. ..oneway=no is default op wegen. Het heeft wel nut op bv een tweerichting fietsrotonde of een parallelfietspad als aanwijzing voor medemappers. Mvg eggie commented 2025-11-24 18:47:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 122446614 (Comments: 2) | torger (Discussed changesets: 6) | the 4.73 meters is correct (although on centimeter is a bit overconfident), the tail is an import error from the source data that I've missed. There is likely a few more of these, if you see one more you can safely round it. The data source is h... commented 2025-11-24 18:42:11 UTC by torger ♦12 |
| 133412994 (Comments: 1) | JerryRiverside (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, description=Palm tree mean that the look of the tower is a mimic of a palm tree or antenna are supported by a real palm tree ? Regards, Marc commented 2025-11-24 18:38:40 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,313 |
| 175072714 (Comments: 1) | nonameclimber (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Eingangs eine Anmerkung: dein Änderungssatz ist viel zu groß. Ein OV je Changeset wäre besser gewesen. Zum Inhalt: Gerne darfst du neue Tags (thw:tz) er... commented 2025-11-24 18:31:34 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,140 |
| 175036729 (Comments: 2) | Walleyflock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Clarification: This is a Ubiquita camera. commented 2025-11-24 18:15:30 UTC by Walleyflock ♦1 |
| 175010643 (Comments: 1) | punkfairie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, thanks for all the edits you've been doing! Details like this are helpful for OpenStreetMap. I'm writing, though, because I notice that you've been leaving empty changeset comments. Myself & other local mappers would pr... commented 2025-11-24 18:09:35 UTC by pwbriggs ♦98 |
| 175076553 (Comments: 3) | shuworm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Antwort commented 2025-11-24 18:07:04 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦16 |
| 128727369 (Comments: 1) | Klerik7 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Neviem ako to ten Inspire robi, avsak tu su zase poposuvane budovy, ale systematicky jednym smerom (na vychod), takze tam bude nejaka principialna chyba. Nesedi im to ani na Ortofoto z roku 2020 (ktoru ste tu zrejme pouzivali), ani na kataster, takze... commented 2025-11-24 18:06:30 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,741 |
| 175010805 (Comments: 1) | dbergv (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, I heard briefly about map battle, but still don't quite know what it is. Either way, could you please try to add a descriptive changeset comment in addition to the hashtag? That way its easier for other mappers to see why you're making... commented 2025-11-24 18:03:47 UTC by pwbriggs ♦98 |
| 175063659 (Comments: 1) | GLPG35 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por la colaboracion pero no te quedo bien mapeado. Tomá como ejemplo el ITS del Buceo. commented 2025-11-24 18:03:24 UTC by muralito ♦2,089 |
| 175046454 (Comments: 3) | Squarion (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke.. dan kun je voor zover het nog niet is getagd toevoegen: ..moped=no ..mofa=no .. traffic_sign=NL:G13 Dat geeft dan op sommige kaarten een dunner lijntje. Mapse.. eggie commented 2025-11-24 17:58:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,636 |
| 175044854 (Comments: 2) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hej Dziękuję, oczywiście poprawię Pozdrawiam, Yukiroshi commented 2025-11-24 17:55:39 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦28 |
| 175028794 (Comments: 1) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Dag Taurus, ik heb je wijzigingen hier weer ongedaan gemaakt, dit is geen fietspad. Omdat de paaltje al gemapt zijn gaat het met routeren ook goed voor mbt motorvoertuigen. commented 2025-11-24 17:50:14 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦30 |
| 175034768 (Comments: 1) | KΝΑRϜ (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, warum entfernst du die Adressdaten vom Unger? cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175034768 commented 2025-11-24 17:48:27 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
| 175061764 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 20) | Nedávaj do adresy ref:minvskaddress kým sa nenaučíš urobiť kompletnú adresu. Tým sa označujú už úplné, skontrolované adresy. commented 2025-11-24 17:44:04 UTC by Dodko ♦1,273 |
| 175069529 (Comments: 1) | Sonic Conscious Studio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-11-24 17:31:10 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175048086 (Comments: 3) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 22) | THANK YE FOR YOUR FIRE PIT REFINING CONTRIBUTION TO O' GREAT OIL REFINERY commented 2025-11-24 17:30:52 UTC by finn-hound ♦9 |
| 175075399 (Comments: 1) | Annhelpingtheworld (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/9632179264 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-11-24 17:25:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175077181 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 404) | wrong comment: Move node back to the original position commented 2025-11-24 17:23:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,409 |
| 175045309 (Comments: 1) | Maty_SK (Discussed changesets: 1) | pozrite si dokumentáciu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed dáva sa tam len číslo bez km/h commented 2025-11-24 17:19:04 UTC by Dodko ♦1,273 |
| 175059700 (Comments: 1) | eversone (Discussed changesets: 51) | `building:material=` is defined as the cladding/facade/exterior / external surfacing, not the internal structures (although this may be the same if only painted) commented 2025-11-24 17:18:08 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175067024 (Comments: 1) | Ville de Metz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, Il est préférable de ne pas attacher les polygones a des routes ou a des chemins. Je viens de corriger Bonne soirée commented 2025-11-24 17:16:39 UTC by jbcharron ♦142 |
| 175049148 (Comments: 1) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 23) | The surrounding area should have been be unrelated to not create an invalid shape https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136869272/ commented 2025-11-24 17:12:01 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175067471 (Comments: 1) | Ville de Metz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour Pour information, les noms de famille dans OpenStreetMap ne sont pas a renseigner en majuscules et je me suis permis de garder l'ancien nom comme nom alternatif car il continuera surement a être utilisé par les gens du qu... commented 2025-11-24 17:10:48 UTC by jbcharron ♦142 |
| 175039821 (Comments: 1) | Ankara Bel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba, yolu hava görüntüsüne göre yanlış düzenlemişsiniz. Düzelttim, eğer bir yanlışlık varsa belirtin lütfen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175076336 commented 2025-11-24 17:04:15 UTC by keyyushi ♦16 |
| 174186466 (Comments: 1) | Wetitpig0 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Please don't duplicate the entire site on all parts, and removing `proposed:landuse=` https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19258555 commented 2025-11-24 17:02:41 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175045883 (Comments: 9) | ceirios (Discussed changesets: 17) | bow down to mr. refinery commented 2025-11-24 16:58:56 UTC by finn-hound ♦9 |
| 175031582 (Comments: 1) | KX675 (Discussed changesets: 25) | `addr:housename=` has been used for the estate (to be broadly at the same level as the `addr:housenumber=` ), and `addr:unit=` for buildings (the other wiki definition, for Tower 1A sub-buildings, and above podiums) commented 2025-11-24 16:58:09 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 174907515 (Comments: 3) | Baloo79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Rendben, köszönöm! commented 2025-11-24 16:54:57 UTC by Baloo79 ♦1 |
| 175071236 (Comments: 1) | xamil (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tato část určitě není ve stavbě, vracím vaše změny zpět. Doporučuji vždy kontrolovat na webu rsd. Např. tady pro tuto stavbu (https://apdos-v2.creativesound.cz/media/stavba/54/leaflet/infoletak_d35-stare-mesto-moh... commented 2025-11-24 16:24:37 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦224 |
| 169678882 (Comments: 1) | SteMue (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo, mir ist aufgefallen dass öfters parking:both:staggered gemappt wurde, obwohl es nicht staggered (versetztes) Parken ist. Staggered bedeutet, dass man links und rechts parken darf, aber wegen des begrenzten Platzes nur einseitig parken kan... commented 2025-11-24 16:22:13 UTC by fmc_1 ♦10 |
| 175018206 (Comments: 2) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 126) | No, these are rough works needed for routing. You should detail the internal layout, not delete it entirely. commented 2025-11-24 16:13:40 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,673 |
| 175064553 (Comments: 1) | Buring (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.... start_date hoort op de gebouwomtrek.. Dus niet op de adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 175060468 (Comments: 1) | staka-RBK_06 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi there :) you added traffic signals to a node along a forest in Russia. I guess that was unintentional so I will undo that. cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2025-11-24 16:00:53 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
| 175064574 (Comments: 1) | anszejek (Discussed changesets: 6) | Usuń zbędny tag 'proposed=motorway', proszę. commented 2025-11-24 16:00:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦693 |
 | 175068502 (Comments: 1) | CHS5290 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, there are some issues with your edit (changeset) here which I would like to discuss: - please don't map in different countries on different continents in one changeset. It makes reviewing harder and annoys people keeping an ... commented 2025-11-24 15:50:16 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,713 |
| 175071268 (Comments: 1) | Juanjo Olcina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Juanjo, ¿Este tramo destruido por la DANA ya está reconstruido? En esta foto de 2025 aún aparece sin ninguna carretera: https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=704858,4367647,705207,4367808&nivelZoom=19&modoH=no... commented 2025-11-24 15:41:56 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,710 |
| 174898271 (Comments: 3) | Isabel Morris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks - updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175072611 commented 2025-11-24 15:40:26 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,664 |
| 173614017 (Comments: 3) | sadzona1902 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mysle ze warto, patrzac na to ze sa rozpisane lokalizacje stacji w dokumentacji commented 2025-11-24 15:38:40 UTC by maaxy_ ♦8 |
| 175067312 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 5) | Those "details" are located in Scotland, Libya and North Korea. At the very least you should have uploaded 3 separate changesets. Also, could you please describe your changesets more accurately than writing "added details" on ev... commented 2025-11-24 15:27:37 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,654 |
| 174929566 (Comments: 2) | TaklamakanDesert (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello ilias_! Thank you for reaching out. I will go ahead and change access=permissive tagging here to access=private and apply the tagging to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445318085) as well. Happy mapping! commented 2025-11-24 15:23:28 UTC by TaklamakanDesert ♦4 |
| 175054369 (Comments: 3) | coatix (Discussed changesets: 1) | *Naschpark commented 2025-11-24 15:18:58 UTC by coatix ♦3 |