| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 167920878 (Comments: 1) | OMAPS123 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Let op... Wanneer je schuift met de kaart verplaats je ongemerkt bv adresnodes. De kaart schuift dan niet maar een object en alles dat er aan vastzit wel. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167920878 Vossenzoom 54 D... commented 2025-06-21 18:11:52 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
 | 167921128 (Comments: 3) | Adrie Stoopen (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted. Before uploading please make sure you're uploading correct data. commented 2025-06-21 18:11:45 UTC by Awoobis ♦139 |
| 167924446 (Comments: 1) | Nikodem Doroba (Discussed changesets: 43) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12943478183 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-06-21 18:11:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167919995 (Comments: 3) | OMAPS123 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik heb wat gescheiden mbv multipolygonen.. Wat leesvoer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples Mapse, eggie commented 2025-06-21 18:09:29 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
 | 167635437 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 28) | I think this is the conflation of two different types of roads with different purposes that simply share the same name. The most common use for "collector road" refers to the bulk of the streets tagged as tertiary in the Las Vegas Valley. T... commented 2025-06-21 18:08:47 UTC by Joseph R P ♦332 |
 | 167899729 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Vierkirchen 112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, in diesem Änderungssatz steht "Update Hydranten", tatsächlich hast du aber eine Kirche um 140m verschoben. Vielleicht schaust du dir das noch mal an. Viele Grüße commented 2025-06-21 18:08:05 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
| 160900297 (Comments: 1) | redd (Discussed changesets: 75) | Do you know whether this bakery is still closed? commented 2025-06-21 18:04:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167903462 (Comments: 1) | Eichelsee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Folgende Anmerkung am Beispiel von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12942110639 und www.openstreetmap.org/node/12942110638: Die Eingabe von „fire_hydrant;slider“ ist problema... commented 2025-06-21 18:01:46 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
 | 167746332 (Comments: 3) | Cupping01555 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 00201555670063 commented 2025-06-21 18:00:17 UTC by Cupping01555 ♦1 |
 | 167921984 (Comments: 2) | Amineee__ (Discussed changesets: 26) | Thank you for the tip commented 2025-06-21 17:57:33 UTC by Amineee__ ♦17 |
| 167921370 (Comments: 2) | sanneterpstra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sanne, Het adres heb ik weer hersteld. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-21 17:56:58 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167920608 (Comments: 1) | EllipticalTiger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-21 17:52:12 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167916297 (Comments: 2) | Azbestcik (Discussed changesets: 176) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168267230/history - czyli to jeszcze nie jest otwarte? commented 2025-06-21 17:51:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
 | 167875212 (Comments: 3) | martin hamel (Discussed changesets: 6) | ok, je vais mettre bicycle=dismount Merci! commented 2025-06-21 17:49:34 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦337 |
 | 161619702 (Comments: 1) | mohamad farid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Assalamualaikum En Farid, Saya Adlan, salah seorang pemeta setia kat OSM ni. Saya baru perasan yang feature air yang awak buat kat dekat dengan L50 dalam UTM ni dah kacau map OSM. Saya faham awak ni mungkin nak explore ke apa, tapi past... commented 2025-06-21 17:41:56 UTC by adlan2001 ♦4 |
| 167915107 (Comments: 1) | uomosaturno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi :) ist es Absicht, dass diese beiden POI in die Datenbank von OSM geschrieben wurden oder sollte das eigentlich ein privates Lesezeichen sein? Grüße silversurfer83 --- Publi... commented 2025-06-21 17:41:06 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167629089 (Comments: 10) | DAG NGL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wiem o openrailway, tu rozmawiamy o tej podstawowej znanej wersji. Dla przeciętnego użytkownika najważniejszą informacją jest to czy tor jest czynny oraz czy jest z siecią czy bez sieci - i można i trzeba odróżnić właśnie graficz... commented 2025-06-21 17:35:10 UTC by DAG NGL ♦3 |
 | 167918283 (Comments: 1) | jonnywindows (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've squared up the buildings commented 2025-06-21 17:24:45 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167917823 (Comments: 1) | jonnywindows (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed '1 Swinley Close' from the name tag as it's not a formal name. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-06-21 17:13:59 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167811487 (Comments: 1) | pd8JUHyoPJ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Die Änderung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395808880 ist völliger Murks. Da ist eine Kette die den Weg vom Parkplatz zur B37 versperrt. Ein Durchlass für Fußgänger, Fahrrad, ... gibt es und nicht mehr. Bitte vor &Aum... commented 2025-06-21 16:56:04 UTC by EinKonstanzer ♦135 |
| 167836543 (Comments: 6) | Manuel19982 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Morning, the routing appears not to be impacting or causing issues, as far as I can tell. We can easily revert the changes if necessary. My submission was made to review it, so if anyone feels the change is too significant, we can revert it i... commented 2025-06-21 16:51:19 UTC by Manuel19982 ♦1 |
| 167912542 (Comments: 2) | SurfBalBay News (Discussed changesets: 2) | The Town of Bay Harbor Islands doesn't assign it any name. It is without a name. commented 2025-06-21 16:40:32 UTC by SurfBalBay News ♦2 |
| 167856733 (Comments: 2) | mama we (Discussed changesets: 8) | wenn's so ist, dann wäre es doch super wenn du es auch gleich änderst! commented 2025-06-21 16:38:59 UTC by mama we ♦4 |
 | 167832515 (Comments: 1) | jakecopp (Discussed changesets: 38) | with all but one POI being in Paris, is that one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/534025632#map=19/52.376381/4.899830) maybe a mistake? commented 2025-06-21 16:38:38 UTC by Kees 59 ♦16 |
| 167906161 (Comments: 1) | markisraki742 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Czekaj moment. Co ty zrobiłeś? Skasowałeś stary przystanek, by dodać nowy, ale z informacją, że już nie istnieje? Ten węzeł nie ma historii, więc coś nawaliłeś. Uważaj, co robisz, bo twoje zmiany kwalifikują się do wycofania. commented 2025-06-21 16:35:51 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 128671546 (Comments: 9) | Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (Discussed changesets: 8) | done commented 2025-06-21 16:35:19 UTC by Bierphysik ♦87 |
 | 167910405 (Comments: 1) | liamrocker (Discussed changesets: 36) | Why not building=construction then? commented 2025-06-21 16:01:50 UTC by Lezurex ♦203 |
 | 8314818 (Comments: 2) | jeffhaack (Discussed changesets: 7) | Kalau tidak salah, tahun 2011 itu OSM impor data secara masif. Untuk kualitas seperti nama dan penempatan itu dikesampingkan. commented 2025-06-21 15:56:56 UTC by FajrAl ♦77 |
| 167919080 (Comments: 2) | OMAPS123 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bedankt voor uw snelle reactie. Was even een kleine test. Fijn dat het goed is gegaan. commented 2025-06-21 15:48:43 UTC by OMAPS123 ♦1 |
| 167801835 (Comments: 8) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 146) | Licencja google, wytyczne OSM są takie a nie inne. Faktem jest że jedni biorą od drugich. Twoje podejście do regionów jest Twoim podejściem. Gdyby większość miała podobne podejście to zamiast tej mapy i jej zawartości miel... commented 2025-06-21 15:46:31 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 150722453 (Comments: 3) | heiglandreas (Discussed changesets: 2) | alles klar, danke :) access=no wird so oft falsch gesetzt (wenn gemeint ist "für KFZ gesperrt"), dass ich lieber nachfrage. Wenn du das vermeiden willst, setz eine note=* dazu, etwa "note=Vollsperrung wegen baufälliger Br&uum... commented 2025-06-21 15:36:27 UTC by FraukeLeo ♦280 |
| 167906120 (Comments: 1) | greetoz (Discussed changesets: 2) | 'Helaas' loopt die straat niet zo recht als je zou denken. Het was dus eigenlijk goed gemapt. Bron PDOK Quick Ortho 2025 (zonder gebladerte) en BGT omtrekgericht. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-21 15:36:12 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167906065 (Comments: 2) | greetoz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Eén brandgang heb ik aangepast. paarden en fietsers routeren daar niet in OSM noexit=yes toegevoegd aan de uiteinden. commented 2025-06-21 15:31:26 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
 | 167829373 (Comments: 2) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 248) | Yes, should have been 'foot'. Now corrected. Thanks for pointing out. commented 2025-06-21 15:26:46 UTC by MacLondon ♦214 |
| 167904189 (Comments: 1) | André Ampers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback. Alle begin is moeilijk. Wanneer je schuift met de kaart en je selecteert per abuis bv een adresnode. Dan schuift ... commented 2025-06-21 15:18:45 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
 | 167681295 (Comments: 1) | kmate97 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Az átépítés óta a Zrínyi Miklós utca zsákutca lett a régi zebránál? A Kosztolányiba hegyesszögben ágazó régi utat elbontott&aac... commented 2025-06-21 15:13:29 UTC by ITineris ♦370 |
| 167906197 (Comments: 2) | markisraki742 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dobrze, że zacząłeś dodawać opisy do wrzucanych zmian, ale to nie znaczy, by w taki sposób, jak tu, oznaczać, że coś jest nieaktualne. Od tego są uwagi. Ew. jeśli znasz angielski, to zapoznaj się ze sposobami archiwizowania obiekt&o... commented 2025-06-21 15:11:13 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
 | 164555233 (Comments: 1) | SoyJosueVerde (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola Josue, Como le he escrito en otras ediciones, estos cambios de nombre van en contra de los principios de edición para OSM Colombia. Por favor revertir sus cambios. Saludos. commented 2025-06-21 15:07:35 UTC by Facalderonm ♦35 |
| 167915970 (Comments: 1) | Gucio10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Go Map nie pozwala dodawać opisów zmian? Część twoich zestawów zmian pozbawiona jest komentarzy, a dotyczy to tych zrobionych przez tę aplikację. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-06-21 15:04:34 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
 | 167900966 (Comments: 1) | u9f4y1f941f9h9 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Somehow I failed to upload my changes in multiple changesets and the comment reflected just part of what I was doing. This changeset actually updates roads from Tammisaari to Perniö to Matilda and lots of details in Matilda. commented 2025-06-21 14:53:29 UTC by u9f4y1f941f9h9 ♦3 |
| 167913213 (Comments: 1) | Adrie Stoopen (Discussed changesets: 17) | Source? commented 2025-06-21 14:51:44 UTC by Szymson ♦363 |
| 167912721 (Comments: 1) | Adrie Stoopen (Discussed changesets: 17) | Source? commented 2025-06-21 14:51:38 UTC by Szymson ♦363 |
| 167905851 (Comments: 1) | Adrie Stoopen (Discussed changesets: 17) | Source? commented 2025-06-21 14:51:32 UTC by Szymson ♦363 |
| 167916985 (Comments: 1) | WSPINKA (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12942633838 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-06-21 14:50:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167902300 (Comments: 1) | Adrie Stoopen (Discussed changesets: 17) | Source? commented 2025-06-21 14:48:59 UTC by Szymson ♦363 |
| 166083088 (Comments: 1) | SoyJosueVerde (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola Josue, Según la guía para mapear en Colombia de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear#Nombres_de_calles), los nombres de las calles son las nomeclaturas oficiales, no los nombres conmemor... commented 2025-06-21 14:41:59 UTC by Facalderonm ♦35 |
| 167916096 (Comments: 1) | Daleg0r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-06-21 14:30:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167890123 (Comments: 1) | goodidea (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo, die marker=aerial haben hier Tags die es sonst nicht gibt, und die anscheinend nicht nötig sind. colour und material sind die Tags für den von oben sichtbaren Teil. Die Form könnte man in marker:shape packen. |
 | 167912408 (Comments: 1) | kazzasLT (Discussed changesets: 2) | Peržiūrėjau, kaip ir nieko ypatingo čia nėra, man tik įtartina, ar tikrai šitas plotas - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329640420 - yra gyvenamoji žemėnauda? Nes na tiek ortofoto labai į tokius sandėlius ar gamybines patalpas pa... commented 2025-06-21 14:18:27 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,948 |
| 167910462 (Comments: 1) | Minie-Mini (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dear user Minie-Mini. This message is to kindly remind you to please type real changeset comments upon changing data in the OpenStreetMap database. In recent days, you have committed several changesets with just "...." is the ... commented 2025-06-21 14:18:18 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,463 |
| 167903834 (Comments: 1) | Libreria Libera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Libreria Libera, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://g... commented 2025-06-21 14:16:39 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 167912055 (Comments: 1) | kazzasLT (Discussed changesets: 2) | Laba diena. Tai sveikinu su pirmu pakeitimu! Visas tas plotas yra gyvenama žemėnauda, t.y. landuse=residential, tai atkeičiau atgal. Viduje nereikia lysvių žymėti atskirais poligonais, jie nėra žemės ūkio žemėnauda, tai ta pati gyvenamoji... commented 2025-06-21 14:13:24 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,948 |
| 159816180 (Comments: 4) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 116) | Danke commented 2025-06-21 14:06:22 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,299 |
| 167911945 (Comments: 1) | Arseniy10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Arseniy10 und willkommen bei OSM! Das Wasserbecken ist seit 2023 bereits hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10931643690 Dein Duplikat habe ich daher wieder entfernt. VG hsc666 commented 2025-06-21 14:06:07 UTC by hsc666 ♦464 |
| 167869178 (Comments: 2) | Schliesstechnik Monn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank You! commented 2025-06-21 14:05:04 UTC by Schliesstechnik Monn ♦1 |
| 167909784 (Comments: 1) | hkelc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catch. War ein Routingproblem - Jetzt geht das routing auch wieder durch das Mühlentor. Rot alt - Grün neu: https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1070232,1070649 commented 2025-06-21 14:04:25 UTC by flohoff ♦2,344 |
| 167861880 (Comments: 1) | mstrbrid (Discussed changesets: 8) | I've 'reopened' Banana Bridge. https://x.com/BristolCouncil/status/1936049587170529681 If you've been past recently you may wish to add you're own updates. commented 2025-06-21 13:58:02 UTC by DaveF ♦1,559 |
| 167547810 (Comments: 1) | AndreasZ91 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Andreas, Wie du vielleicht mitbekommen hast, ist der Wald im Mapnik-Render beschädigt und ich vermute, dass das mit der Fläche Schwarzer Teich zusammenhängt. Ich wollte das hier reparieren, aber frage mich wie ich hier ver... commented 2025-06-21 13:49:35 UTC by monotar ♦81 |
 | 166608797 (Comments: 3) | Maarten Deen (Discussed changesets: 70) | i mapped the 1 and 2-3 "binario" i will continue mapping soon, the footway is -1 commented 2025-06-21 13:42:33 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
 | 167898198 (Comments: 3) | LarsBG (Discussed changesets: 68) | Go' ide 😋 commented 2025-06-21 13:39:43 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,640 |
| 167913695 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 512) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167584169 commented 2025-06-21 13:18:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 166846294 (Comments: 3) | Josbert Lonnee (Discussed changesets: 71) | Dank je voor je reactie. Ik ben benieuwd naar hoe het wordt! commented 2025-06-21 13:08:45 UTC by IIVQ ♦134 |
| 167865082 (Comments: 3) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 61) | Dzięki. Poprawiłem. Prawdopodobnie przez przypadek zaznaczyłem. Nie ma tam przepustów ani mostów commented 2025-06-21 13:08:04 UTC by rademalis ♦2 |
| 164873058 (Comments: 2) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 339) | Teun. .. De wereld is klein.. Groet.. eggie commented 2025-06-21 13:07:44 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 166303653 (Comments: 1) | Maarten Deen (Discussed changesets: 70) | Hi Maarten! Thanks for your additions in Aulla, but the bike shop you modified (Biciclo) 1. Must be on his own 2. You should have mapped it 70;73 (1) Thanks. p.s: i mapped it correctly :) --- 1: https://wiki.ope... commented 2025-06-21 13:04:01 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
| 158124941 (Comments: 2) | Skywaltuh (Discussed changesets: 26) | Kochany bocie, czy chodziło ci o tagi dworca w Lipince Głogowskiej? commented 2025-06-21 12:58:38 UTC by Skywaltuh ♦16 |
| 167912679 (Comments: 1) | RedAuburn (Discussed changesets: 158) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4814862 commented 2025-06-21 12:57:41 UTC by RedAuburn ♦219 |
 | 167452249 (Comments: 1) | Cécile Poinot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other. Map them as individual buildings. And, don't forget to square each individual building. (First unglue conneted nodes please) Best regards... commented 2025-06-21 12:55:10 UTC by Frans S ♦9,629 |
| 167912498 (Comments: 1) | rle32795 (Discussed changesets: 10) | sourced from survey commented 2025-06-21 12:53:26 UTC by rle32795 ♦19 |
 | 167847054 (Comments: 4) | Obninskiy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Подчистил. А тоннель нарисован же commented 2025-06-21 12:51:43 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 167895224 (Comments: 5) | SurfBalBay News (Discussed changesets: 2) | I put "bicycle=unknown" because I wasn't sure of the buildings rules on their footpath. No worries about the address confusion I appreciate your contribution. commented 2025-06-21 12:48:35 UTC by SurfBalBay News ♦2 |
| 167887557 (Comments: 2) | whellmut (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hallo flo2154, ich hatte Deinen Eintrag nicht gefunden. Jetzt ist er ergänzt und meiner gelöscht. Vielen Dank. commented 2025-06-21 12:47:21 UTC by whellmut ♦18 |
| 167879247 (Comments: 2) | walrecht (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi Eggie, Bedankt. Dan weet ik dat voortaan. Fijne dag. Gr, Thiemo commented 2025-06-21 12:44:45 UTC by walrecht ♦1 |
| 167846791 (Comments: 5) | Aymannnnnnnnnnnnnn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks ratrun! commented 2025-06-21 12:43:09 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
 | 167896191 (Comments: 1) | uftyv (Discussed changesets: 3) | how can you tell from imagery that these are all water storage, could they possibly be other kinds of silo? eg. for grain? commented 2025-06-21 12:42:20 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167900568 (Comments: 2) | uftyv (Discussed changesets: 3) | + it would be more accurate to use source:geometry since actually the source was the person who mapped it as a node prior to you. You can also leave off the source tag and instead rely on the changeset level source. commented 2025-06-21 12:40:36 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167900656 (Comments: 1) | uftyv (Discussed changesets: 3) | some information was lost here, before we had address 86B and then address 2/68 but you've replaced both with just 68B. If you're not sure which applies to what best to leave the two address nodes as they are and only move the buildi... commented 2025-06-21 12:38:20 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
 | 167880646 (Comments: 3) | RuiM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Não aprofundei a questão, mas como és dessa zona, podes confirmar melhor do que eu. Normalmente, os fortes têm as suas próprias paredes e fazem parte de um sistema defensivo. Terás de confirmar se alguma das s... commented 2025-06-21 12:31:35 UTC by AntMadeira ♦241 |
| 167554132 (Comments: 2) | Ravman (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've updated this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167911590 commented 2025-06-21 12:28:05 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167700842 (Comments: 2) | Sauvik Das (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've reverted this change. commented 2025-06-21 12:25:02 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167769850 (Comments: 4) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I've changed the network and operator based on my prior comment. commented 2025-06-21 12:23:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167764812 (Comments: 2) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I've restored the prior route names based on community feedback at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624 commented 2025-06-21 12:18:13 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167764029 (Comments: 2) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I've restored the prior names based on community feedback at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624 commented 2025-06-21 12:16:07 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167774788 (Comments: 6) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I've restored the prior name based on this being the better route name over the artificial route name from PTv2 per community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624 commented 2025-06-21 12:12:53 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167848114 (Comments: 3) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I've restored the proper name "Dubbo XPT" based on this being the better route name over the artificial route name from PTv2 per community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624 commented 2025-06-21 12:12:31 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167910476 (Comments: 1) | Nikodem Doroba (Discussed changesets: 43) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12942421339 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-06-21 12:11:30 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
 | 167782260 (Comments: 1) | Patrick340 (Discussed changesets: 3) | bonjour attention au nom. Ici le magasin Intermarché est déjà cartographié ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12140554661 donc il ne faut pas ajouter le nom en plus sur le bâtiment. Je fais la correction. B... commented 2025-06-21 12:05:34 UTC by Patchanka ♦381 |
| 166662182 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 258) | Jak coś `proposed:landuse=*` landuse=proposed jest nierekomendowane tak samo jak `building=proposed` :P Poprawiłem jak coś, ale widać, że ten użytkownik lubi spore wandalizmy, bo po przed momentem wycofałem budowę CPK. commented 2025-06-21 12:04:34 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,043 |
| 167782499 (Comments: 1) | Patrick340 (Discussed changesets: 3) | bonjour attention à ne pas utiliser le nom pour décrire les objets. Ici j'ai l'impression que vous souhaitez indiquer que le bâtiment abrite des terrains de tennis ? Auquel cas on peut l'indiquer mais pas dans... commented 2025-06-21 12:03:21 UTC by Patchanka ♦381 |
| 167906317 (Comments: 2) | dpolovinkin (Discussed changesets: 42) | think so too :) commented 2025-06-21 11:59:33 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦330 |
| 167867788 (Comments: 1) | StettinPommerensdorf (Discussed changesets: 13) | To nie jest poprawna zmiana. To wręcz wandalizm. Wycofane. commented 2025-06-21 11:51:04 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,043 |
| 116116014 (Comments: 3) | InfosReseaux (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thank you for the clarification. Interesting! commented 2025-06-21 11:46:36 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
 | 167263383 (Comments: 1) | ALRam (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please supply the source for this change. Rural streets are either named (usually signposted) or unnamed (in which case the place name is used in the address, but not on the street). commented 2025-06-21 11:28:41 UTC by wolfbert ♦100 |
| 167887784 (Comments: 1) | slodki (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hej, jeśli jest tu budowa i nie ma wstępu, to przydałoby się jeszcze usunąć bicycle=designated i foot=designated. Dobrze dodać też access=no. No chyba, że jednak da się tędy przejść/przejechać, to wtedy powinno być tylko constructio... commented 2025-06-21 11:26:13 UTC by YomanNH ♦303 |
 | 167374365 (Comments: 5) | rkdclgh (Discussed changesets: 11) | Never mind, thank you for noticing the issue! commented 2025-06-21 11:16:57 UTC by rkdclgh ♦7 |
| 167903892 (Comments: 1) | Максутко-мощный (Discussed changesets: 2) | не мусори commented 2025-06-21 11:14:31 UTC by literan ♦6,674 |
| 167903664 (Comments: 1) | Максутко-мощный (Discussed changesets: 2) | не надо засорять общую карту своими личными объектами commented 2025-06-21 11:04:51 UTC by literan ♦6,674 |
| 167907333 (Comments: 1) | Gajusz Kubasik (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-06-21 10:41:30 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167869503 (Comments: 1) | Anais Tarroux (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, et bienvenue sur OSM "source=google map;google street view" ?? Attention ! Il est rigoureusement INTERDIT de copier des données de Google vers OpenStreetMap, vous les savez pourtant. https://wiki.op... commented 2025-06-21 10:40:25 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,463 |
| 167833871 (Comments: 3) | Phút (Discussed changesets: 7) | User is blocked now for other reasons https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18371 , DWG ticket 2025062010000323 . commented 2025-06-21 10:35:51 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,355 |
| 167868176 (Comments: 3) | Dmitriy Zavodnikov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay.. but please use a node, because there are a lot of other addressnodes Don't use the building shape. Greetz.. eggie commented 2025-06-21 10:35:37 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
 | 167835286 (Comments: 2) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 17) | Здравствуйте. Девгуны это хутор а не деревня. Он находится на территории деревни Петюны commented 2025-06-21 10:35:25 UTC by addr: ♦17 |
| 167876096 (Comments: 1) | OSMANIA666 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Восстановите карту города. Территория города Красновишерска выкинута из его отношения, остались лишь два кусочка. commented 2025-06-21 10:33:29 UTC by fserges ♦54 |
 | 157656323 (Comments: 4) | yamada-as (Discussed changesets: 5) | Well taken into account, thank you for your feedback. commented 2025-06-21 10:19:25 UTC by ⵟⴰⴳⵔⴰⵡⵍⴰ ♦10 |
 | 50152325 (Comments: 1) | marek kleciak (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hi marek, since you are still active.. question about material = rcc. What does it mean? Thanks, redd commented 2025-06-21 10:14:59 UTC by redd ♦383 |
| 131816551 (Comments: 1) | Maverick12 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi Maverick12, what does roof:material=rcc mean? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323469799 thanks, redd commented 2025-06-21 10:13:30 UTC by redd ♦383 |
| 165432203 (Comments: 2) | s-tikhomirov (Discussed changesets: 12) | P.S. Ah, just saw that the name changed a few months ago. Nevertheless, there was already a POI at this location - the name should have been updated. commented 2025-06-21 10:11:58 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦388 |
| 73721874 (Comments: 1) | escaglio (Discussed changesets: 6) | place_of_worship? l'alpeggio soggiornato da Papa Giovanni (quale?) non mi sembra equiparabile ad una chiesa, non credo sia un luogo consacrato dalla religione cattolica... ecc. commented 2025-06-21 10:10:09 UTC by Jrachi ♦761 |
| 167244974 (Comments: 1) | MilkTeaaa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi @MilkTeaaa, thanks for your improvements in this changeset. Unfortunately, the imagery you used is partially outdated (no updated imagery is available at the moment). I surveyed this area before your changes. So I reverted some edits you made at t... commented 2025-06-21 10:08:44 UTC by travaudat ♦8 |
| 167854344 (Comments: 6) | hasahi (Discussed changesets: 5) | yeah, makes sense. just did that, cna check, should be good now commented 2025-06-21 10:08:10 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦330 |
 | 167870799 (Comments: 1) | moszkva ter (Discussed changesets: 24) | пишите плиз норм комментарии, уже и я и другие мапперы вам про это говорили, что такое "l"? commented 2025-06-21 09:49:31 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦330 |
| 167779221 (Comments: 2) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 157) | Давно уже. Патрули гоняют commented 2025-06-21 09:45:18 UTC by solenoid jam ♦173 |
| 167801325 (Comments: 1) | NTTrailsMEE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396460767 was newly added in here, and looks like it should be added to the western bit of the C2C. When adding new ways via Vespucci I don't know of an easy way to check what relations they "... commented 2025-06-21 09:43:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,355 |
| 167113298 (Comments: 3) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 164) | Das liegt daran, dass es nun einfach mal wenig Sinn macht, für ein gutes halbes Jahr andere Schilder anzubringen. Aber von mir aus kann es so bleiben. Ich wollte nur auf die offiziell derzeit gültige behördliche Bezeichnung der alten u... commented 2025-06-21 09:42:23 UTC by raffie78 ♦6 |
| 167753127 (Comments: 6) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 103) | Das hatte ich ursprünglich gemacht, siehe die oben verlinkten Diskussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/u-bahn-strecke-als-teil-eines-pilgerweges/88027/21 commented 2025-06-21 09:40:24 UTC by Luzandro ♦905 |
| 167903322 (Comments: 1) | CarlFriedrich (Discussed changesets: 12) | Den Punkt gibt es schon in der Nähe.Wo ist denn die richtige Position? Außerdem ist dei Eintrag mit beschreibendem Namen mangelhaft. Siehe schon vorhandenen Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/280016446 commented 2025-06-21 09:36:50 UTC by Fischkopp0815 ♦266 |
| 167770291 (Comments: 1) | HRoy (Discussed changesets: 7) | HI Herbert, kleiner Tip zu Häusern, wenn sie rechtwinklig sein sollen: Nachdem du die Eigenschaften vergeben hast kannst du mit der Taste "Q" die Winkel sauber machen. Und falls du mal an dem Haus vorbei kommst, kannst... commented 2025-06-21 09:30:56 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167820427 (Comments: 2) | Joiswas (Discussed changesets: 4) | Korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2025-06-21 09:21:52 UTC by Joiswas ♦4 |
| 167649453 (Comments: 2) | NathanBnm (Discussed changesets: 20) | J'ai relevé la référence directement sur la plaque au sol. Sur une autre plaque il était indiqué 105 alors j'ai pensé que c'était la référence. Peut-être que j'a... commented 2025-06-21 09:15:50 UTC by NathanBnm ♦30 |
| 167891395 (Comments: 5) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 146) | I faktycznie Tarnowa chyba tykać nie będę commented 2025-06-21 09:14:12 UTC by bartgron ♦133 |
| 167866923 (Comments: 3) | gymate (Discussed changesets: 19) | Jogos, bocsi, javítottam! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167904259 commented 2025-06-21 09:05:37 UTC by gymate ♦32 |
| 167887150 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Translated names from English to Italian via https://localize.osm.tracestrack.com commented 2025-06-21 09:03:23 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
| 167887449 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Translated names from English to Italian via https://localize.osm.tracestrack.com commented 2025-06-21 09:03:15 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
| 167887590 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Translated names from English to Italian via https://localize.osm.tracestrack.com commented 2025-06-21 09:03:06 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
| 167887776 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Translated names from English to Italian via https://localize.osm.tracestrack.com commented 2025-06-21 09:02:59 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
 | 167681677 (Comments: 1) | PiroOwl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Добрый день, а зачем вы добавили тропу, там где установлен запрещающий знак с колючей проволокой и может грозить штраф, если смотритель н... commented 2025-06-21 08:50:37 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦14 |
| 167894794 (Comments: 1) | pahlavi_temecula (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi :) please do not use other maps as a source if you don't have the explicit permission to do so. cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167894794 ... commented 2025-06-21 08:32:06 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167500204 (Comments: 2) | NTTrailsSW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Can you please rectify or remove the stile. commented 2025-06-21 08:18:07 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 82012601 (Comments: 1) | Piet128 (Discussed changesets: 26) | In diesem Änderungssatz wurden zahlreiche freistehende Häuser fälschlicherweise als building=house erfasst commented 2025-06-21 08:14:41 UTC by redd ♦383 |
| 167856385 (Comments: 3) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 146) | Thank you very much, I really appreciate your work and the mapy.com maps! commented 2025-06-21 08:07:02 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦99 |
| 167779249 (Comments: 3) | Luke Westwalker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Rozumiem, w takim razie upewnij się, że nie ma odwrotnej pisowni na tabliczkach. Jeśli nie ma, to zmień również tagi addr:street dla adresów przy tej ulicy na prawidłową pisownię. commented 2025-06-21 08:05:37 UTC by pavvv ♦467 |
 | 167647408 (Comments: 12) | naxngiga (Discussed changesets: 1) | As long as everything in the changeset can be sourced from allowed sources then that's okay, however those sources should be mentioned in the changeset tags. commented 2025-06-21 07:57:33 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167857933 (Comments: 3) | Schleifleistenbruch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke redd commented 2025-06-21 07:53:14 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167856561 (Comments: 2) | disc24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, dass der letzte Harvester da durchgepflügt ist, ist jetzt sicher schon ein paar Jahre her. Die kommen ja überall durch. ;-) Da sind zwar noch Fahrspuren in sehr schlechtem Zustand vorhanden, die jetzt langsam zuwachsen. Fussg&au... commented 2025-06-21 07:39:06 UTC by disc24 ♦25 |
| 167870674 (Comments: 1) | ilx (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Attention aux relations dont les route=bus lors de modifications. J'ai corrigé pour r13436709 r13436710 Bon jardinage Marc commented 2025-06-21 07:35:51 UTC by mga_geo ♦245 |
| 167832669 (Comments: 3) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 105) | ok verstehe, danke. Ein paar deiner erfassten Adressen lassen sich nur sehr schwer interpolieren. Aber vielleicht hast du einfach eine sooo gute Kenntniss von Stadt- und Strassenplanung, dass ich das als Antwort akzeptiere. 2 offensichtliche ... commented 2025-06-21 07:26:40 UTC by redd ♦383 |
| 167900172 (Comments: 1) | Aardjon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kann man hier auch direkt vor Ort einkaufen oder sich beraten lassen, oder ist das nur ein Lager/Versandzentrum für den Onlineshop? commented 2025-06-21 07:06:04 UTC by Aardjon ♦1 |
| 167893213 (Comments: 1) | spalinger (Discussed changesets: 25) | Super, mersi! commented 2025-06-21 06:14:33 UTC by habi ♦1,833 |
| 148138068 (Comments: 1) | bahnpirat (Discussed changesets: 66) | Hallo bahnpirat, "Würgassen 380/220 kV" mag ja gern die betrieblich-operative Bezeichnung sein, aber als name=* würde ich "Umspannwerk W." (nach Beseitigung des Typos) doch bei Weitem bevorzugen. Weil es mit Sicherheit d... commented 2025-06-21 05:34:30 UTC by FraukeLeo ♦280 |
| 167883400 (Comments: 1) | BANS_MAPS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The buildings look much better when squared up, the shortcut to square up is 'Q'. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-06-21 05:31:17 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
 | 165489825 (Comments: 3) | adnaaniii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Half of it's legs are not on the track which makes the bench tilted towards the swamp/lake and its thrilling/adventurous sitting on it haha commented 2025-06-21 05:27:20 UTC by adnaaniii ♦1 |
| 167720116 (Comments: 4) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Habe die Strassenparameter nicht definiert, sollte mit dem Autor geklärt werden. Für mich sieht dieser Abschnitt sehr nach einem Fußgänger dominierten Bereich aus. Gepflastert von Haustür zu Haustür, Mülltonnen auf... commented 2025-06-21 05:08:28 UTC by North14 ♦7 |
| 167874040 (Comments: 1) | acirep (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag acirep, Je hebt het grasvlak vastgemaakt aan de HSL een niveau lager. Dat kan fysiek niet. Ik heb het vlak losgemaakt van het tunneltraject. Tip Goed inzoomen en goed kijken wat je met elkaar verbindt. Wegen nooit aan vlakken vastpla... commented 2025-06-21 05:03:27 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167895487 (Comments: 1) | Wesleysmalls (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tip..... Dit is wel goed gegaan omdat je iets hebt toegevoegd aan de relatie zelf. Busroutes zelf kun je echter niet bewerken met editor iD. (De relatie gaat dan stuk) Dat kan wel met editor JOSM. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-21 04:53:19 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167895389 (Comments: 1) | Wesleysmalls (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Svp niet overal oneway=no toevoegen op regulieren wegen. Dat is default. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Communit... commented 2025-06-21 04:49:17 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
 | 167870110 (Comments: 2) | yappie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Yes you are correct, its a swimming pool. The issue is with interface in Russian, which I was using for editing. The "basin" is translated as "бассейн", which on Russian means "swimming pool" and I haven'... commented 2025-06-21 04:47:08 UTC by yappie ♦1 |
| 167857299 (Comments: 2) | tnomis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja, es handelt sich um eine Kurzparkzone (max. 90 Minuten) commented 2025-06-21 04:45:12 UTC by tnomis ♦1 |
 | 167242085 (Comments: 1) | Geosnow10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 拜託不要把不同獨立路線的公車路線,全部放在同一個relation裡面 每一條路線都是獨立運行的彼此之間沒有任何關聯 這樣子在很多應用程式如OsmAnd會顯示錯誤 也會發生Osmose錯誤 commented 2025-06-21 04:44:33 UTC by Edison lu ♦19 |
| 167869875 (Comments: 1) | falcon2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 台北市算是異體字，並不算簡體字 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167869875 commented 2025-06-21 04:26:11 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,418 |
| 167888916 (Comments: 2) | tomyak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Awesome thank you, I finally think im getting the hang of it with some practice. Thank you for the reference to the wiki! commented 2025-06-21 04:16:33 UTC by tomyak ♦2 |
| 167879584 (Comments: 1) | Numac (Discussed changesets: 28) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1405169650 I've pointed out in several previous comments on your changes that you need to stop intersecting your golf course features. In the case above, between a bunker and a rough. You'... commented 2025-06-21 03:10:01 UTC by b-jazz ♦636 |
| 167860608 (Comments: 1) | jwselevator (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I saw that this is your first edit and had a couple things to note. First, is this the correct location? I see two industrial buildings closer to the road than you marked, are these the... commented 2025-06-21 02:59:36 UTC by pwbriggs ♦34 |
| 164799217 (Comments: 5) | 캔디레인 (Discussed changesets: 5) | changeset/167896336 에서 되돌렸습니다. commented 2025-06-21 02:57:49 UTC by honnip ♦1 |
| 167725029 (Comments: 2) | shangjing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert incorrect highway edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167895990 commented 2025-06-21 02:20:56 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167894473 (Comments: 1) | tomyak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, the surface of that path does look like asphalt, is there a reason why you've removed that tag? commented 2025-06-21 02:16:00 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167868000 (Comments: 1) | sherparoofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I was reviewing your changeset and I noticed that you only wrote "-" in the changeset comment field. In the future, please do use meaningful changeset comments-- as “-” does not help ot... commented 2025-06-21 01:56:29 UTC by pwbriggs ♦34 |
| 167863484 (Comments: 1) | brhinc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I was reviewing your changeset and I noticed that you only wrote "-" in the changeset comment field. In the future, please do use meaningful changeset comments-- as “-” does not... commented 2025-06-21 01:47:59 UTC by pwbriggs ♦34 |
| 167862851 (Comments: 3) | broadway4593 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, will appreciate if you can write more detailed change comments which describe what and why you did the change - this will greatly help other mappers to understand what happened. "עדכונים במולדת" - is not good comment. (se... commented 2025-06-21 01:11:51 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 127260324 (Comments: 1) | Alan Bragg (Discussed changesets: 85) | This is a bench with name=Amenity. I didn't see any bench names today. ok to assume that's a mistake in tagging and clean it up? commented 2025-06-21 00:49:05 UTC by gdt ♦38 |
| 167632696 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmap mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18372 commented 2025-06-21 00:32:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167876741 (Comments: 1) | Tomfowi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, ich glaube du hast dich hier verschrieben - Du hast hier ein motor_vehicle=designated drauf gemacht. Angenommen da steht ein Zeichen 260 + Anlieger frei ist das aber motor_vehicle=destination - nicht designated. Wenn da ein Zei... commented 2025-06-20 23:08:41 UTC by flohoff ♦2,344 |
| 159933914 (Comments: 2) | spalinger (Discussed changesets: 25) | Ciao habi Ist mit www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167893213 korrigiert. Seit Längerem zeichne ich nun auch fehlende Gebäude ein 👍. Gruss zurück! commented 2025-06-20 22:57:02 UTC by spalinger ♦12 |
| 167892918 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 57) | To niezły bbox ująłem przez to, że chciałem skorygować docelowyroute na styku dwóch dużych area:highway. commented 2025-06-20 22:44:04 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 165646063 (Comments: 1) | jwdevine21 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, this was also incorrect due to sidewalks/bike paths. They only time they really should be tagged as '...=no' is if there are restrictions or signs indicating ' no....access' for a given type. commented 2025-06-20 22:37:09 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦103 |
| 167885167 (Comments: 1) | tuxayo (Discussed changesets: 47) | errata pour source: ajouter: "données existantes" pour "Hameau de la Traversière". commented 2025-06-20 22:36:19 UTC by tuxayo ♦273 |
 | 167790914 (Comments: 1) | Pura Vida Bitcoin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Pura Vida Bitcoin, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https:/... commented 2025-06-20 22:30:21 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 167182649 (Comments: 1) | jwdevine21 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Unfortunately, this wasn't accurate. There are sidewalks on each side of the street. commented 2025-06-20 22:25:45 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦103 |
| 167892363 (Comments: 1) | Polartist (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, j'organise une course d'orientation dans le bois de Névent à Plouzané. Mes modifications sont bien prises en compte mais ne s'affichent pas toujours bien en ligne. commented 2025-06-20 22:22:32 UTC by Polartist ♦1 |
| 167892108 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 406) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-06-20 22:20:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167841899 (Comments: 8) | Wandel-Appeltje (Discussed changesets: 31) | Volgens AI: Voor wat het waard is.. 'Het is lastig te zeggen wanneer Pocket Earth precies wordt bijgewerkt, omdat ze geen vaste updatecyclus hebben. De app-ontwikkelaars, GeoMagik LLC, brengen updates uit wanneer ze nieuwe functies toevoegen... commented 2025-06-20 22:04:26 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167636460 (Comments: 2) | UncleZhanger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the advice. I didn’t know about the google rule. It is based on my ground survey, the only reason I noticed it was that Osmand navigated me there with an overweight truck, then I saw the sign and I had to go around the block. commented 2025-06-20 21:56:00 UTC by UncleZhanger ♦1 |
| 167891692 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 57) | Coś się zapomniałem. A chęć wstawienia tej nazwy to był powód ruszania tych terenów w ramach https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167891530 commented 2025-06-20 21:54:27 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 167772675 (Comments: 2) | atlochowski (Discussed changesets: 16) | Poprawiłem całość: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167891562 commented 2025-06-20 21:49:41 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,043 |
| 167891562 (Comments: 1) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 150) | https://um.warszawa.pl/documents/61166/63025835/Kiedacza-Nugat+%28Roso%C5%82a-Kopci%C5%84skiego%29+-+budowa+DDR+SOR+UD+Ursyn%C3%B3w.pdf/ef1c39b8-ad8f-0c67-60e3-b106958f4650?t=1716536258586 commented 2025-06-20 21:48:18 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,043 |
| 166515288 (Comments: 1) | Cameronmabe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please take care when adding tags, you have managed to tag a woodland and a boundary as 60 mph commented 2025-06-20 21:41:58 UTC by Nathan_A_RF ♦219 |
 | 167778272 (Comments: 2) | LompoulDesert (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello muralito, Thanks for reaching out. I did base these directionality modifications on evidence gathered from Esri World Imagery. I saw that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584764547 has a car positioned in the direction of travel, which ... commented 2025-06-20 21:38:43 UTC by LompoulDesert ♦2 |
 | 136415250 (Comments: 1) | George Karidis (Discussed changesets: 8) | The junction layout that you mapped at 39.5549520,19.9120813, 39.5704980,19.8928244 and 39.5904770,19.8929881 do not reflect reality: they are in fact simple undivided junctions. Only map junction layouts that reflect reality. commented 2025-06-20 21:36:44 UTC by ika-chan! ♦242 |
| 167878805 (Comments: 2) | prino (Discussed changesets: 5) | If the law isn't maintained it stops being a law. I have been walking on motorways, or rather the emergency lane of motorways, in Lithuania for more than 20 years, I've seen people riding bikes on the emergency lane. Just yesterday a shovel... commented 2025-06-20 21:31:26 UTC by prino ♦2 |
| 157353952 (Comments: 1) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 30) | sul "cestino del vetro" che geometria hai aggiustato? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7004112971/history#map=19/44.104864/9.815484 commented 2025-06-20 21:16:13 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
| 167863265 (Comments: 1) | domi_nick (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv psv wlicza taksówki i prywatne autobusy commented 2025-06-20 21:02:19 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,043 |
| 167889803 (Comments: 1) | pootriarch (Discussed changesets: 30) | there are no traffic lanes south of ellis. i changed the crossings to 'tram/path' from 'rail/path' so they could be marked as having signals. removed no-left from powell to ellis, as ellis is one-way. please review/correct commented 2025-06-20 20:57:37 UTC by pootriarch ♦23 |
 | 167485633 (Comments: 1) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 15) | hi Laveure, your changeset comment is too brief fyip, it lead me to thinking that the prior mapper was of ill intent however in my investigations it's nothing of sorts.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111497549/history/1 Once again, pl... commented 2025-06-20 20:52:54 UTC by buy_osmand ♦1 |
| 167888386 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 107) | Dodatkowe źródło: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid03RNYUEWWLhhHrfkfJoE2Jhc8TmzJ5wmAgZqp7DaP1G4CUzvxX9ihXJuJT8578Saul&id=100064560588116 commented 2025-06-20 20:52:31 UTC by Anas masuris ♦112 |
| 167885844 (Comments: 3) | GPvD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167885844 commented 2025-06-20 20:49:49 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167888743 (Comments: 1) | KamilSteinbach (Discussed changesets: 82) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3329572154 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-06-20 20:41:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167459196 (Comments: 2) | Sisquou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry for the late response. It is a little street vendor outside the building on the street. So yes, the location is right. It's a nice couple selling azorean Hotdogs and they are there all the time. Cheers for asking mate! Have a ... commented 2025-06-20 20:33:54 UTC by Sisquou ♦1 |
| 167888258 (Comments: 1) | ad_vantages (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycz... commented 2025-06-20 20:30:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167856447 (Comments: 6) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 78) | Jak będziesz miał, to spoko, ale pytanie, czy te plany się nie zmieniły? Jest sporo dróg proposed na podstawie np. mpzp czy koncepcji sprzed wielu lat i na tym się skończyło. commented 2025-06-20 20:30:44 UTC by theDM ♦82 |
| 167857913 (Comments: 1) | ***juggernaut*** (Discussed changesets: 34) | Ist mit diesem CS der Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4615155 gelöst? commented 2025-06-20 20:29:32 UTC by george1201 ♦224 |
| 167876250 (Comments: 1) | Maro86 (Discussed changesets: 2) | "railway=disused" bedeutet, dass sich hier noch eine Bahnstrecke (Gleise, Signale usw.) befindet, die aber nicht mehr genutzt wird. Laut Luftbildern ist das nicht der Fall und auch Reste einer Bahnstrecke sind nicht erkennbar. Daher bitte n... commented 2025-06-20 20:21:38 UTC by aixbrick ♦835 |
| 167875094 (Comments: 1) | Maro86 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und willkommen bei OSM, Name und Adresse sind bereits am Gelände erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/656001044. Gruß commented 2025-06-20 20:11:39 UTC by aixbrick ♦835 |
| 160246398 (Comments: 1) | Pastèque24 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Salut, Dans le nom des gares, on ne rajoute jamais "Gare de xxx", je te laisse corriger celle de Périgueux commented 2025-06-20 19:57:26 UTC by gendy54 ♦584 |
| 146234393 (Comments: 1) | novaelezabathea (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi novaelezabathea, you added a strange housenumber here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11515603041 Could you check that again? commented 2025-06-20 19:52:22 UTC by os-emmer ♦328 |
| 167817518 (Comments: 1) | MYCOnline (Discussed changesets: 1) | What is going on here, this seems to be completly the wrong location? commented 2025-06-20 19:48:47 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 167815280 (Comments: 1) | jfml (Discussed changesets: 3) | It's curious East Coast Cured show the location, show an address of 109/C; The gaurage address isnb 109/C and siuspect this is now East Coast Cured. Putting the note on is the right thing to do.. Best option is for someone to survey here... commented 2025-06-20 19:42:49 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
 | 167815725 (Comments: 2) | IrdiIs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Which data, that the Albanian government has with an open license can be used to map buildings more accurately than satellite imagery? I would really appreciate if you can point me to the data i can use. Thank you! commented 2025-06-20 19:40:47 UTC by IrdiIs ♦1 |
| 160955173 (Comments: 1) | mpbin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao, ho visto che hai tolto la forma societaria dal operator (tolto SpA), non capisco perché, per me più precisione è meglio di meno precisione, e nel tag name c’era già OVS senza Spa commented 2025-06-20 19:35:46 UTC by dieterdreist ♦836 |
| 167856111 (Comments: 4) | nosec (Discussed changesets: 2) | * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flashing_lights commented 2025-06-20 19:16:19 UTC by nosec ♦2 |
| 156109834 (Comments: 3) | MrTux (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oh ja, das war unpräzise. Es geht um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086485824 Park des 30. Juli. Auf der spielplatz-muenchen.de taucht der Name tatsächlich auf: https://spielplatz-muenchen.de/?spielplatz=10385515 Leider erlaub... commented 2025-06-20 19:14:38 UTC by Rainero ♦580 |
| 167853212 (Comments: 2) | nosec (Discussed changesets: 2) | > perché hai rimosso le corsie? OpenStreetMap adotta uno schema di mappatura secondo cui le corsie vengono rappresentate o mappate come due linee parallele solo nei punti in cui è presente una separazione fisica strutturale, ... commented 2025-06-20 19:03:44 UTC by nosec ♦2 |
| 165900182 (Comments: 2) | Waldamsel (Discussed changesets: 10) | Die Kurzbezeichnungen 'KODE' u.a. habe ich in einer Veröffentlichung über die ESTW Module und Typen gefunden. Scheint somit Bestandteil oder zumindest eine sinnvolle Ergänzung der Bezeichnung zu sein. Gab es bei den alten Ste... commented 2025-06-20 19:01:57 UTC by Waldamsel ♦7 |
| 167706871 (Comments: 1) | BenZackBumm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hinweis zur Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167707259#c1450910 commented 2025-06-20 18:43:57 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦253 |
| 167706964 (Comments: 1) | BenZackBumm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hinweis zur Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167707259#c1450910 commented 2025-06-20 18:43:52 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦253 |
| 167706997 (Comments: 1) | BenZackBumm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hinweis zur Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167707259#c1450910 commented 2025-06-20 18:43:47 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦253 |
| 167707014 (Comments: 1) | BenZackBumm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hinweis zur Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167707259#c1450910 commented 2025-06-20 18:43:42 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦253 |
| 167707149 (Comments: 1) | BenZackBumm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hinweis zur Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167707259#c1450910 commented 2025-06-20 18:43:38 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦253 |
| 167883622 (Comments: 1) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 86) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1408119634 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-06-20 18:41:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167866065 (Comments: 1) | MatthiasGo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank vollständiger zu machen. Du hast auch darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Soweit ich das von hier aus beurteilen kann, ha... commented 2025-06-20 18:37:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 166062927 (Comments: 2) | Ich_mag_Züge (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, das rechte Gleis (von Kurhessen-Therme bis Kreuzung Rolandstraße) hast du mir service=yard und maxspeed=25 getaggt, was aber beides nicht stimmt. War das ein Versehen, weil du die Gleise auf dem Betriebshof Wilhelmshöh... commented 2025-06-20 18:34:18 UTC by Lenkradfreek ♦8 |
| 167523732 (Comments: 2) | YaronS (Discussed changesets: 5) | An honest mistake, can be reverted. commented 2025-06-20 18:31:40 UTC by YaronS ♦5 |
| 167522920 (Comments: 4) | YaronS (Discussed changesets: 5) | I'm not sure but I should probably file a duplicate merge request for Wikidata, I usually prefer not to change unless the the newer item has more details about the object. commented 2025-06-20 18:30:13 UTC by YaronS ♦5 |
| 86414959 (Comments: 3) | schoka (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo PPete2, vor vielen Jahren habe ich den Martinusweg über die freigegeben GPX-files https://martinuswege.eu/wegverlauf-route-details.php?kategorie=Hauptweg&id=115&start= nachgezeichnet. Falls sich mittlerweile etwas geändert... commented 2025-06-20 18:23:53 UTC by schoka ♦47 |
| 166481531 (Comments: 4) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 107) | No nie. „R-1” wyleciało z nazwy oficjalnej. Na okładce już nie ma, w wykazie instrukcji nie ma. Tytuł dokumentu w pliku pdf jeszcze nic nie znaczy. commented 2025-06-20 18:23:35 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦27 |
| 167883299 (Comments: 1) | tswsl (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've found lots of odd building geometries and weird overlaps that don't seem to line up with any available aerial imagery while trying to make this update. I've tried not to make anything worse, but needs a bit more attention and s... commented 2025-06-20 18:22:45 UTC by tswsl ♦2 |
| 167876228 (Comments: 1) | pahlavi_temecula (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi there :) little hint: Go Map!! has a feature that allows you to make objects rectangular. Please go ahead and find it so your buildings look better in the future cheers --- Published usin... commented 2025-06-20 18:19:41 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167878065 (Comments: 1) | Kity!! (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, Kity thanks for helping with the database. I got a question though: You put the node of the shop on the sidewalk of a busy highway far away from all buildings. That's rather unfortunate. Maybe yo... commented 2025-06-20 18:18:24 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 138370747 (Comments: 1) | bwbuz (Discussed changesets: 49) | Die Eckigen Klammen im traffic_sign sind nicht für Erläuterungen dar sondern für Zahlen/Text Parameter des Schildes, wenn das nicht teil der Zeichen-ID ist. Berschreibungen sollten lieber in description. commented 2025-06-20 18:05:49 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,299 |
| 165862159 (Comments: 5) | draxxiu (Discussed changesets: 6) | + commented 2025-06-20 17:57:54 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167860113 (Comments: 1) | BaleBaleBale (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo BaleBaleBale und willkommen bei OSM! Das HISKP ist seit vielen Jahren bereits hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249313565 Dein Duplikat habe ich daher wieder entfernt. VG hsc666 commented 2025-06-20 17:54:59 UTC by hsc666 ♦464 |
| 167854050 (Comments: 1) | Martin Köster (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, wenn es sich um reinen Fußweg handelt, passt bicycle=no foot=designated highway=path segregated=no traffic_sign=DE:240 nicht so richtig. Eine entsprechende Beschilderung vorausgesetzt wäre das obige z... commented 2025-06-20 17:44:59 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
| 167881502 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 114) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12939507408 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-06-20 17:41:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167874973 (Comments: 1) | s8evq (Discussed changesets: 53) | 🙏 commented 2025-06-20 17:31:43 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦408 |
| 167473166 (Comments: 3) | nobs (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wunderbar, freut mich! commented 2025-06-20 17:09:12 UTC by Metzor ♦364 |
| 167417106 (Comments: 4) | FanZandberga (Discussed changesets: 2) | tak, używam StreetComplete i czasami do korygowania mapy JOSMa. nie wiedziałem, że takie rzeczy są niedozwolone commented 2025-06-20 16:52:30 UTC by FanZandberga ♦2 |
| 167879409 (Comments: 1) | Webstach (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-06-20 16:51:19 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167876736 (Comments: 1) | Mikola Sankin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Не надо трогать терравей. Это точно не гравий. Верните как было. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167876736 commented 2025-06-20 16:46:11 UTC by velomeloman ♦17 |
| 167796948 (Comments: 1) | HugoC01 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonsoir Hugo Merci pour l'ajout de ces supports Est-ce possible d'ajouter operator=Enedis + operator:wikidata=Q3587594 sur chacun dans cette zone s'il te plaît ? commented 2025-06-20 16:36:01 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦146 |
| 167873637 (Comments: 1) | Czsss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-20 16:32:21 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167877370 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: "… ("Kassel-Vorderer Westen/-Mitte")" commented 2025-06-20 16:25:39 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167800736 (Comments: 1) | AmericanHomePros (Discussed changesets: 1) | OSM is not an appropriate venue for ad copy. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167800736 commented 2025-06-20 16:22:45 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,097 |
| 167816703 (Comments: 4) | DomKor (Discussed changesets: 14) | inoltre è più comodo in un secondo momento eliminare la key, dato che i lavori stanno stranamente procedendo in maniera spedita (hanno già terminato tutta l'escavazione) commented 2025-06-20 16:22:18 UTC by DomKor ♦10 |
| 165997278 (Comments: 4) | HugoC01 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello This part of the document is outdated and cable=torsade shouldn't be used. I will fix the wiki, thank you for mentioning. cables=* can't be set on French low voltage insulated cables as we barely see if there 4 or 5 cables (depe... commented 2025-06-20 16:19:32 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦146 |
| 140505220 (Comments: 2) | Oxeelix (Discussed changesets: 7) | Now visible on Mapilio 2024-05-19. Added details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167877756 commented 2025-06-20 16:13:43 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦672 |
| 160813168 (Comments: 1) | LordMadsen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wenn du schon nicht vor Ort bist, bitte auf die Aktualität des Kartenmaterials achten! Dies Haus ist schon lange abgerissen, commented 2025-06-20 16:11:31 UTC by Berlin53 ♦59 |
 | 167802582 (Comments: 2) | arte2002 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Gracias por el apoyo He creado un mapa en uMap donde se pueden consultar los datos https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/map/caminos-publicos_1237791 Saludos commented 2025-06-20 16:07:13 UTC by arte2002 ♦56 |
| 165683120 (Comments: 3) | dddos (Discussed changesets: 17) | Danke für deine Antwort und das Aufräumen! commented 2025-06-20 16:03:18 UTC by Metzor ♦364 |
 | 167876331 (Comments: 1) | Colbertson (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hopefully fixed the route relations correctly after removing this crossing https://www.osm.org/way/675264310 commented 2025-06-20 15:38:43 UTC by Colbertson ♦104 |
| 166220603 (Comments: 1) | intschutschuna (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hallo intschutschuna, Wieso hast du das westliche Stück komplett gesperrt, das östliche aber entsprechend deinem Link? Ist da noch eine Extrabaustelle? Wie lange noch? Viele Grüße und fröhliches Kartieren M... commented 2025-06-20 15:22:36 UTC by Metzor ♦364 |
 | 118374924 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 827) | love the comment haha commented 2025-06-20 15:17:18 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦330 |
| 167788104 (Comments: 4) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | "Stacja Paliw istnieje kilka lat" Istnieje w terenie i na mapie. W obiekcie oznaczonym jako stacja nic się nie zmieniło. Obiekt pozostał taki jak jakim go wprowadziłeś w dwóch edycjach. "Może warto żebyś ... commented 2025-06-20 15:16:03 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
 | 167830563 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Espinosa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Si no pueden pasar Vehículos entonces es motor_vehicle=no (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle). el tag access= no tiene relación con este caso. saludos --- Pu... commented 2025-06-20 15:10:03 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,334 |
| 167800764 (Comments: 1) | AlexanderF (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo AlexanderF, Üblicherweise fangen Einbahnstraßen an Kreuzungen an. Bist du dir sicher, dass diese nicht schon beim folgenden Erschließungsweg anfängt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331883490/history#map=19/48.... commented 2025-06-20 15:09:21 UTC by Metzor ♦364 |
| 167830762 (Comments: 1) | rlaracol (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hola. La numeración es conocida así? porque veo que borró las manzanas. Quizás sería mejor agregar addr:block_number= (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:block_number) también. --- |
| 114050086 (Comments: 1) | Printr (Discussed changesets: 3) | yeah you've created quite a lot of buildings which don't exist there, a whole quarter with many small buildings isn't one building (like that one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004865071)... have to be fixed commented 2025-06-20 15:08:08 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦330 |
| 167592511 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ah I see now that the access=yes tag is newer, thanks. ... although all roads leading to here are access=private... ah well commented 2025-06-20 15:07:50 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦320 |
| 167874918 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 83) | Reverting beacuse of accidental node modification #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167875044 commented 2025-06-20 15:05:00 UTC by TinPetreković ♦48 |
| 166453960 (Comments: 6) | ine63 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello ine63, These changesets are being discussed on the Community Forum due to questions about the tags used (meaning of "retail shops") and potential license issues. Can you contribute, in English or in Korean? https://community.op... commented 2025-06-20 15:04:03 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦320 |
| 167874021 (Comments: 1) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-06-20 14:51:06 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167873202 (Comments: 1) | MateoGR (Discussed changesets: 8) | En caso de disponer de documentos oficiales donde se indique que es camino público rogamos los aporten para corregir la edición. En caso contrario rogamos se abstengan de editar erróneamente en OSM por el bien de la comunidad. commented 2025-06-20 14:46:15 UTC by MateoGR ♦5 |
| 167681763 (Comments: 1) | Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (Discussed changesets: 29) | Was tun wenn die Wege (laut Quelle) nicht mehr zu finden sind (ungestützte Bäume, Fichtendickicht) und daher nicht mehr begehbar? Südlich des Backofens war kein Durchkommen mehr. Die Kletterer nutzen daher die von mir eingezeichneten u... commented 2025-06-20 14:35:06 UTC by Mike Krüger ♦7 |
| 164288161 (Comments: 1) | kartler175 (Discussed changesets: 132) | Hallo krtler, Ich habe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13154664/history#map=19/48.533163/8.753521&layers=N wieder zu no-u-turn geändert. Oder gibt es dort eine Spezialregelung? Gruß Metzor commented 2025-06-20 14:34:29 UTC by Metzor ♦364 |
| 167847846 (Comments: 1) | Phút (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167873333 commented 2025-06-20 14:22:53 UTC by jeslop ♦3,631 |
| 167847890 (Comments: 1) | Phút (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167873308 commented 2025-06-20 14:22:33 UTC by jeslop ♦3,631 |
| 167851428 (Comments: 1) | Phút (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167873290 commented 2025-06-20 14:22:03 UTC by jeslop ♦3,631 |
| 167851443 (Comments: 1) | Phút (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167873252 commented 2025-06-20 14:20:54 UTC by jeslop ♦3,631 |
| 167654557 (Comments: 2) | binarygnome (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opps, sorry. I'll keep that in mind. Some of my other edits are from buildings that have been demolished. I'll try and fix the ones that need to be commented 2025-06-20 14:07:39 UTC by binarygnome ♦1 |
 | 167428430 (Comments: 3) | mona_magdy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, mona_magdy! Thank you for the clarification. To continue your discussion with Catherine Kachan, I would like to add some details. There is an article with recommendations for mapping in the UAE region: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki... commented 2025-06-20 14:05:13 UTC by Maryna Makarava ♦16 |
| 167857852 (Comments: 1) | Glocke-Oelde (Discussed changesets: 14) | Moin, das ist hier eben kein cycleway sondern eine Fahrradstraße - Das war schon richtig getagged mit bicycle_road=yes Ich hab den teil mal reverted: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes Flo commented 2025-06-20 13:44:55 UTC by flohoff ♦2,344 |
| 167858630 (Comments: 4) | oskarsk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! I'll bear this in mind next time. commented 2025-06-20 13:43:05 UTC by oskarsk ♦1 |
| 167800463 (Comments: 2) | muralito (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hola. Yo también, pero ese es el nombre correcto. Esta asi en los mapas de hidrografia y en las cartas del IGM. commented 2025-06-20 13:31:56 UTC by muralito ♦2,014 |
| 167868666 (Comments: 3) | neonvortex (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2025-06-20 13:13:00 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167848589 (Comments: 2) | adrianmg13 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hola, por favor contesta los mensajes que te han indicado, es fundamental para poder coordinarnos Saludos commented 2025-06-20 13:08:03 UTC by aTarom ♦765 |
| 167868703 (Comments: 1) | mvsprang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-20 13:07:25 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167870058 (Comments: 1) | Kaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=4799093 commented 2025-06-20 13:07:23 UTC by Kaiserschmarren ♦10 |
| 167854740 (Comments: 1) | sait candemir (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted this changeset because of wrong street renaming https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167869884 commented 2025-06-20 13:03:12 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦107 |
 | 167858691 (Comments: 1) | reznadreve (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím - díky za upřesnění plánované polohy. Ten kus trati před Federálem (novou budovou Národního Muzea) už je ve výstavbě? Měl jsem za to, že ted se dělá ta horní... commented 2025-06-20 12:59:47 UTC by Piskvor ♦429 |
| 167857077 (Comments: 2) | Martin-D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Muss ich die Tage mal hin radeln, auswendig kann ich es nicht sicher sagen. Dürfte aber wahrscheinlich nur ein Rohr sein. Die Sackgasse liegt etwas abseits, mir war gar nicht bewusst, dass dort ein Entwässerungsgraben läuft. Die Gr&aum... commented 2025-06-20 12:48:26 UTC by Martin-D ♦1 |
| 145918836 (Comments: 1) | Jack465 (Discussed changesets: 7) | absolute legend commented 2025-06-20 12:43:35 UTC by 2hu4u ♦109 |
| 167801733 (Comments: 2) | gudensberger (Discussed changesets: 8) | Moin, auf Basis der Beschreibung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337376790 Schaue aber gleich nochmal genau aus dem Fenster wenn ich mit dem Zug fahre commented 2025-06-20 12:41:14 UTC by gudensberger ♦29 |
| 167858004 (Comments: 1) | Dan123iel (Discussed changesets: 5) | I suspect the lanes:conditional should also be increased to 3 as likely it only changes by one lane during the AM lane shift. I'm not sure though. commented 2025-06-20 12:39:35 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167858133 (Comments: 1) | Dan123iel (Discussed changesets: 5) | if there's no arrows on the road or other road signs then we shouldn't be setting turn:lanes per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn it should only be used where there are road markings or sign markings indicating the lane guidance... commented 2025-06-20 12:38:17 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167198568 (Comments: 3) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 101) | Super, habe die Tags noch mal entsprechend angepasst commented 2025-06-20 12:38:12 UTC by Till_btn ♦17 |
| 167834420 (Comments: 2) | DDD丶Samuel (Discussed changesets: 11) | 不好意思，我看平纵断面示意图两个版本都有。以正式开工之后的走向为准 commented 2025-06-20 12:35:39 UTC by DDD丶Samuel ♦7 |
| 166740885 (Comments: 3) | bicyclett (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ach schade, hab deine Antwort zu spät gelesen und bin nicht mehr dort :( commented 2025-06-20 12:35:28 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦388 |
| 167491243 (Comments: 3) | mona_magdy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank for your clarification! Best regards, Maryna commented 2025-06-20 12:33:40 UTC by Maryna Makarava ♦16 |
| 157439310 (Comments: 2) | L'imaginaire (Discussed changesets: 47) | Geef je nog wat meer toelichting bij jouw vraag? Bedoel je dat je liever expliciet een oneway=no tag zou zien op de fietspaden (in de veronderstelling dat het om eenrichtingsfietspaden gaat)? commented 2025-06-20 12:31:18 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦408 |
| 121629317 (Comments: 2) | jmapb (Discussed changesets: 49) | Yeah just a typo. But this is actually an automotive leasing broker (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_leasing) and I'm not sure it should be amenity=car_rental. Maybe closer to shop=car. There's a short mention of this question und... commented 2025-06-20 12:25:58 UTC by jmapb ♦401 |
| 167860679 (Comments: 2) | mvanwensen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wederom dank voor de leerzame feedback! commented 2025-06-20 12:21:31 UTC by mvanwensen ♦6 |
| 167645837 (Comments: 1) | kjon (Discussed changesets: 151) | Hallo kjon, ähnlich wie gerade in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167646293 angemerkt: Auch hier an der Kreuzung Bergmannstraße/Friesenstraße hast du "doppelte" Ampeln ergänzt, da es bereits die Ampeln auf den ... commented 2025-06-20 12:15:12 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦388 |
| 167791975 (Comments: 2) | ChrisFromRV (Discussed changesets: 131) | Wurde korrigiert. Danke. commented 2025-06-20 12:13:21 UTC by ChrisFromRV ♦58 |
| 161828296 (Comments: 4) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 107) | I jeszcze https://kolejemalopolskie.com.pl/pl/aktualnosci/9876_w-oswiecimiu-powstanie-nowoczesna-baza-wraz-z-zapleczem-technicznym-do-obslugi-taboru-kolejowego Więc budowa jest potwierdzona, natomiast jako, że byłem tam bardzo dawno ostatni... commented 2025-06-20 12:12:42 UTC by Anas masuris ♦112 |
| 167646293 (Comments: 1) | kjon (Discussed changesets: 151) | Hallo kjon, du hast hier Ampeln eingetragen, die es so eigentlich nicht gibt: An der Kreuzung Sonnenallee/Zigrastraße hast du crossing=traffic_signals-Punkte auf den Radweg-crossings ergänzt, allerdings haben die Radwege bereits Ampeln an ... commented 2025-06-20 12:11:21 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦388 |
| 167759686 (Comments: 1) | Not Just 4 Bikes (Discussed changesets: 5) | that was fast! was going to add these and you beat me to it -- well done commented 2025-06-20 11:49:32 UTC by mbeyerle ♦44 |
| 167865949 (Comments: 1) | bastek (Discussed changesets: 56) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2358280031 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-06-20 11:40:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167846177 (Comments: 4) | iAmFromZeQuebec (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, no problem. In the wiki, it says access=yes is implicit, but can be added for more precise information. Thanks! commented 2025-06-20 11:33:58 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦337 |
| 167864623 (Comments: 1) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 144) | Also update doctors in some offices commented 2025-06-20 11:07:22 UTC by M!dgard ♦779 |
| 167839215 (Comments: 2) | ist410 (Discussed changesets: 5) | For the other cases, it makes sense, since there are probably other things on upper floors of the same building. commented 2025-06-20 11:03:14 UTC by gmar5 ♦66 |
| 167848672 (Comments: 1) | adrianmg13 (Discussed changesets: 22) | En este changeset se ha eliminado un núcleo de población válido y se ha modificado la tipología de poblaciones sin seguir las Directrices de etiquetado españolas de OSM. Revierto este changeset y el siguiente... commented 2025-06-20 10:53:01 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,623 |
| 167848900 (Comments: 1) | adrianmg13 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hola, adrianmg13, ¿por qué eliminas nodos sobre barrios que existen, como Ciutat d'Assís (https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=716685,4246961,718107,4247619&nivelZoom=17&capasids=Imagen;,0103_NTV;&tcapas=... commented 2025-06-20 10:50:23 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,623 |
| 167861648 (Comments: 2) | HistorischDorpshartWilnis (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #167863663 Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-20 10:43:59 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167863352 (Comments: 1) | mtmail (Discussed changesets: 48) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395327512 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-06-20 10:40:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167784801 (Comments: 1) | wheymann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wegen 'review_requested': Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke! commented 2025-06-20 10:39:28 UTC by map per ♦1,292 |
| 167771596 (Comments: 1) | atticus-sullivan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wegen 'review_requested': Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke! commented 2025-06-20 10:38:18 UTC by map per ♦1,292 |
| 167856511 (Comments: 2) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 101) | Hi, mit dem Weg hatte ich die Breite des Weges ausgemessen, er ist nun wieder entfernt. Der name war bereits so gesetzt, ich hatte nur die width-Angabe geändert. VG. commented 2025-06-20 10:35:15 UTC by chris66 ♦359 |
| 167862414 (Comments: 2) | Kaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 13) | hier die Diskussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mir-ist-da-anscheinend-ein-ganz-grosses-hoppala-in-einem-changeset-passiert/131644 commented 2025-06-20 10:27:26 UTC by Kaiserschmarren ♦10 |
| 165730771 (Comments: 3) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dit is inmiddels door Jasper gerepareerd commented 2025-06-20 10:27:05 UTC by Jillis E ♦139 |
| 167862553 (Comments: 1) | MoX (Discussed changesets: 5) | bicycle commented 2025-06-20 10:26:30 UTC by MoX ♦4 |
| 124421816 (Comments: 1) | merlenormanstudio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9928882901/history has shop = Express Facials that was added in this edit shop=Express Facials ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from ht... commented 2025-06-20 10:25:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167431187 (Comments: 3) | mona_magdy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you for improving intersection geometry! It is routable now and is done in accordance with OSM wiki. Best regards, Siarhei Salauyou. commented 2025-06-20 10:22:26 UTC by Siarhei Salauyou ♦2 |
| 166205352 (Comments: 1) | Simon Hobeck (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi Simon, do you know if Bunker Bikes still operates elsewhere? I see he was at Temple Meads for several years. I just deleted the node there after finding the shop gone, but now I've learned he used to operated from here, I'd be interested... commented 2025-06-20 10:13:34 UTC by mstrbrid ♦23 |
| 166638008 (Comments: 2) | DaanLT (Discussed changesets: 54) | Labas, ne klaida. Shop reik trinti commented 2025-06-20 09:55:33 UTC by DaanLT ♦105 |
| 166559787 (Comments: 2) | DaanLT (Discussed changesets: 54) | Labas, ne klaida. Shop reik trinti commented 2025-06-20 09:55:00 UTC by DaanLT ♦105 |
| 167859535 (Comments: 1) | shanmugamrs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Shan Phil from the Data Working Group here. Please can you explain these edits and your workflow? What does source=deduce mean? Cheers Phil commented 2025-06-20 09:52:08 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,367 |
| 167853326 (Comments: 2) | DrDee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Habs angepasst. VG pitfire commented 2025-06-20 09:38:06 UTC by pitfire ♦658 |
| 163218305 (Comments: 1) | FasterBoy0 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, FasterBoy0, nicht mehr irgendwie (Bahndamm, Einschnitt, Brücke, etc,) sichtbare Teilstücke einer abgebauten Bahnstrecke gehören definitiv nicht zu OSM! Daher setze ich Deinen edit zurück. Sehr erwünscht w... commented 2025-06-20 09:33:50 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦123 |
| 167815984 (Comments: 1) | FasterBoy0 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, FasterBoy0, nicht mehr irgendwie (Bahndamm, Einschnitt, Brücke, etc,) sichtbare Teilstücke einer abgebauten Bahnstrecke gehören definitiv nicht zu OSM! Daher setze ich Deinen edit zurück. Sehr erwünscht w... commented 2025-06-20 09:33:50 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦123 |
| 167860528 (Comments: 1) | fabianvdbordevelto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Wanneer je het op deze manier aanpast zijn we een adres kwijt op de oude locatie en op de nieuwe locatie hebben we twee identieke adressen. Ik heb de oude adresnode hersteld. De nieuwe samenvoegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-20 09:32:54 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 164069261 (Comments: 1) | Melvyn_BRACON (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, vous avez renseigné que la poubelle est bio, ce qui ne veut rien dire dans ce contexte. Qu'avez-vous voulu indiquer ? commented 2025-06-20 09:31:59 UTC by Syl ♦947 |
 | 167829367 (Comments: 5) | DKTR99921222 (Discussed changesets: 4) | A omlouvám se tímto SK komunitě OSM za "práci navíc" s revertem. Drobná poznámka. Chtělo by to ale ten český POI Importer upravit, aby neukazoval slovenská místa, když je... commented 2025-06-20 09:27:33 UTC by DKTR99921222 ♦2 |
| 167733958 (Comments: 7) | vvad (Discussed changesets: 70) | top, zeer dank! commented 2025-06-20 09:27:03 UTC by vvad ♦14 |
| 7204536 (Comments: 1) | Tronikon (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, Tronikon, ist zwar schon 14 Jahre her und Du seit 'nem Jahr nicht mehr bei OSM gewesen, aber ich frag trotzdem mal, ob das von Dir beabsichtigt war, hier in die Relation der Westerwaldquerbahn (1411954) ein"disused=yes;no"... commented 2025-06-20 09:24:33 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦123 |
| 164542452 (Comments: 4) | Meskalin (Discussed changesets: 43) | hi map per, Dein Wunsch ist mir Befehl! ;) Gruselige Geschichte mir dem Gedenkstein... commented 2025-06-20 09:21:57 UTC by Meskalin ♦28 |
| 167822123 (Comments: 4) | الهلالي قسورة العرب (Discussed changesets: 10) | Good luck trying to find a valid reason lol commented 2025-06-20 09:21:08 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
| 165895043 (Comments: 1) | vlattanzi (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ciao! Il memorial 12814442517 non mi risulta esistente... posso cancellarlo? commented 2025-06-20 09:20:57 UTC by Claudio Tam ♦20 |
| 167860039 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 373) | Copy-Paste-Fehler: Ich wollte https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4813392 erwähnen :) commented 2025-06-20 09:15:02 UTC by habi ♦1,833 |
| 167857369 (Comments: 5) | Gerstbroodje (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yep... Het Rietje ook gelijk aangepast en de richting even gedraaid. Het lijkt nu nog verkeerd. Even CTRL-F5 een paar keer. Mapse commented 2025-06-20 09:07:50 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167859046 (Comments: 1) | Odi_Ziom (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-06-20 08:51:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 163343365 (Comments: 3) | meteorquake (Discussed changesets: 9) | I suppose this quote on the web reflects the problem - "Plants of the Mediterranean scrub The Mediterranean scrub may be divided into tall scrub, with well-developed trees that can provide shade and humidity to the undergrowth, and short scru... commented 2025-06-20 08:50:02 UTC by meteorquake ♦7 |
| 152725887 (Comments: 4) | Tom Ameye (Discussed changesets: 90) | Iemand anders gaf aan dat er een poortje was, voor het vee. Maar vrij toegankelijk. commented 2025-06-20 08:48:44 UTC by MinkeL ♦1 |
| 165819300 (Comments: 1) | Iwerne (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Iwerne, did you mean to change ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516833636 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043781881 to a guideway? The guideway only starts on the bridge as I see it. commented 2025-06-20 08:45:37 UTC by mstrbrid ♦23 |
| 167843804 (Comments: 2) | omeroseed (Discussed changesets: 1) | merhabalar, en kısa sürede düzelteceğim. geri bildiriminiz için teşekkürler. commented 2025-06-20 08:45:08 UTC by omeroseed ♦2 |
| 167855285 (Comments: 1) | CollyWolly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-20 08:44:18 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
 | 152791837 (Comments: 2) | Odiz (Discussed changesets: 19) | Kan se start/slut av stien på luftfoto som stemmer over ens med Kartverket. kan dog ikke bekrefte hvor stien går i skogen. Har slette denne + andre for å unngå misforståelser. commented 2025-06-20 08:42:57 UTC by Odiz ♦10 |
| 167848925 (Comments: 3) | Wemble2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke Top! Mapse, eggie commented 2025-06-20 08:42:54 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167858626 (Comments: 1) | Odi_Ziom (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-06-20 08:41:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167844039 (Comments: 3) | Wemble2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Beste Eggie, Bedankt voor je feedback. Helemaal eens om een keuze te maken tussen vlak en node. Om de een of andere reden stonden er 5 wind turbines als vlak gemarkeerd en niet langer als node, terwijl alle andere wind turbines (bij di... commented 2025-06-20 08:39:53 UTC by Wemble2 ♦2 |
| 167858118 (Comments: 1) | Geomaus 123 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Teilweise verkehrt die Stadtbahn ja mitten im Straßenverkehr ohne eigenen Gleiskörper mit Trennung zum MIV. Das kann man nicht als U-Bahn bezeichnen. In Köln hat man alles als Stadtbahn tituliert, was einen eigenen Gleiskörper ha... commented 2025-06-20 08:30:00 UTC by Geomaus 123 ♦1 |
| 167853749 (Comments: 1) | shanmugamrs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please complete your work, as your upload is merely nodes, no building outlines appeared, may be an incomplete upload, please mind there are a rate limiting now, please wait the entire upload process until complete before you close the JOSM, perform ... commented 2025-06-20 08:22:59 UTC by IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C ♦3 |
| 167732649 (Comments: 2) | Aleh Aliakseyenka (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi. Thanks for the explanation and for adding the noname=yes tag. It's good to know how street naming works in Latvia — I appreciate the local insight and I will take this into account in the future. Have a nice day! commented 2025-06-20 08:18:48 UTC by Aleh Aliakseyenka ♦14 |
| 165722972 (Comments: 4) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ik heb het verwijderd. commented 2025-06-20 08:13:02 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦8 |
| 167851619 (Comments: 3) | tntchn (Discussed changesets: 20) | 我直接打在討論串好了不然 source 有長度限制 https://manage-oga.ncku.edu.tw/p/406-1189-236260,r11.php?Lang=zh-tw https://www.dcard.tw/f/ncku/p/256522942 https://www.instagram.com/p/DKZbeh5SViR/ https://www.facebook.com/... commented 2025-06-20 08:11:40 UTC by tntchn ♦22 |
| 167828175 (Comments: 1) | Jatlksoa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hei ja tervetuloa openstreetmappiin! Myös taloyhtiön yksityisen sisäpihan kartoittaminen openstreetmappiin on sopivaa. Jos pääsy on estetty, taloyhtiön tapauksessa lukitulla portilla niin tämän portin vo... commented 2025-06-20 08:09:55 UTC by Sakari_N ♦71 |
| 167828197 (Comments: 1) | Jatlksoa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hei ja tervetuloa openstreetmappiin! Myös taloyhtiön yksityisen sisäpihan kartoittaminen openstreetmappiin on sopivaa. Jos pääsy on estetty, taloyhtiön tapauksessa lukitulla portilla niin tämän portin vo... commented 2025-06-20 08:09:55 UTC by Sakari_N ♦71 |
| 167855585 (Comments: 1) | ivansanchez (Discussed changesets: 4) | Buenos días. Los nombres en OSM deben escribirse con la letra inicial de las palabras principales en mayúscula. Más información en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Capitalisation Gracias por... commented 2025-06-20 08:06:49 UTC by dcapillae ♦356 |
| 167855589 (Comments: 1) | ivansanchez (Discussed changesets: 4) | Buenos días. Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido. Las preguntas sobre contenedores de reciclaje in StreetComplete no funcionan bien. Hay una conversación en Github para corregirlo: https://github.com/streetcomplete/S... commented 2025-06-20 08:02:14 UTC by dcapillae ♦356 |
| 167814509 (Comments: 2) | DO3SBA (Discussed changesets: 3) | oh danke für den hinweiß commented 2025-06-20 07:46:53 UTC by DO3SBA ♦1 |
| 167822414 (Comments: 1) | TheFighter137 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour TheFighter137, la voie de bus sur les quai haut rive droite n'est pas autorisée aux vélo, j'ai donc enlevé les tag associé. Bonne journée commented 2025-06-20 07:36:45 UTC by Roue-doudou ♦47 |
| 167855687 (Comments: 1) | xpertfoundationrepair (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi xpertfoundationrepair, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: htt... commented 2025-06-20 07:26:25 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 167855904 (Comments: 1) | bklaesener (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dann mache ich den Hinweis zu ;-) commented 2025-06-20 07:21:09 UTC by berndw ♦580 |
| 167839309 (Comments: 1) | tiresiasmonk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank for you contribution. I see you draw mountain paths like highway=footway (called Foot Path in editor), but this tag is for ways which are dedicated only for pedestrian with signs or specific rules (like sidewalk on city streets). ... commented 2025-06-20 07:16:51 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦107 |
| 167799757 (Comments: 1) | Mf7719 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Mf7719, wenn es sich nicht um einen POI handelt .. was ist das für eine Telefonnummer? Wenns ein POI ist .. was ist des denn für einer? shop=farm? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dfarm Gruß tu... commented 2025-06-20 07:09:49 UTC by tux67 ♦1,934 |
| 167850374 (Comments: 2) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 1) | 当时我也是实验添加的。这两个路口名只存在于路牌上，没有人会用，甚至路牌上的名称都不统一。比如说下面那个路口，一个路牌叫秋实街口，一个叫秋实路口，根本无法确定，所以就删... commented 2025-06-20 07:01:49 UTC by hahae ♦2 |
 | 167638717 (Comments: 1) | GIDEON1234 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Mapper, this is not a good way to map a road. Different roads meeting at a junction should be represented as such. And this is not a significant road to map. Thanks and keep mapping commented 2025-06-20 06:51:00 UTC by Qwajo OSM ♦40 |
| 108547143 (Comments: 2) | phypere (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik heb use_sidepath verwijderd. Het routeert weer. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-20 06:43:24 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| X | 167752325 (Comments: 9) | LukeyBear (Discussed changesets: 4) | That's absolutely ok. We all are :) If you think about these kinds of edits in the future I suggest you first come to c.osm.org and bounce your idea off the other mappers there to find potential flaws and polish it. That helps to reduce m... commented 2025-06-20 06:37:34 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 155033887 (Comments: 3) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 258) | Na stronger kontraktu są zdjecia projektu I Tam nie ma tej drogi serwisowej. Jest te informacja sprzed kilku miesięcy, że wybrano 2. wariant. commented 2025-06-20 06:36:24 UTC by theDM ♦82 |
| 167823995 (Comments: 2) | Pmz (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bonjour, le tag vehicle=permit correspond à la description suivante sur le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:boundary%3Dlimited_traffic_zone En effet, dès à présent et au fur et à mesure de l&#... commented 2025-06-20 06:28:22 UTC by Pmz ♦5 |
| 167854341 (Comments: 1) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 17) | sorry commented 2025-06-20 06:24:48 UTC by addr: ♦17 |
| 167838660 (Comments: 2) | Martin Köster (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ups, das war tatsächlich nicht meine Absicht. Es sollte den (mittlerweile) reinen Gehweg betreffen, der in Ingolstadt direkt an der Donau verläuft. Bis Ende des Jahres 2024 war er noch Gehweg mit Fahrradmitbenutzung. Entlang der Fahradstras... commented 2025-06-20 06:11:19 UTC by Martin Köster ♦1 |
| 167850114 (Comments: 1) | wma2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18366 commented 2025-06-20 06:06:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167837048 (Comments: 2) | BPWW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voorlopig de niet valide bijdrage verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-20 05:57:19 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167846317 (Comments: 2) | mdevogel (Discussed changesets: 1) | De rijschool heb ik verplaatst en samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode op het andere gebouw. gr eggie commented 2025-06-20 05:55:48 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167839315 (Comments: 1) | الهلالي قسورة العرب (Discussed changesets: 10) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18365 commented 2025-06-20 05:54:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167851551 (Comments: 3) | Lexi A (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396730552 turn lanes are not modelled like that, we only draw a separate way where there is physical separation, if there's just paint on the ground it's best to use the turn:lanes tag https://wiki.openstr... commented 2025-06-20 05:47:59 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| X | 167754473 (Comments: 3) | LukeyBear (Discussed changesets: 4) | :) commented 2025-06-20 05:25:23 UTC by LukeyBear ♦2 |
| 167817293 (Comments: 1) | KRIVESH M K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've added a footpath which is placed on top of an existing highway and is also on top of a building. Such duplication could disrupt routing, thus I've removed it. Unless your route is verifiab... commented 2025-06-20 05:24:40 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167651744 (Comments: 1) | avyeegaztd (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, der CS-Kommentar wurde nicht beantwortet. Ich deute den CS-Kommentar als Antwort auf meine Nachfrage. Wie sind die Nutzungsbedingungen dieses offiziellen ALKIS bitte? Bitte einen link zu diesem ALKIS. Der angebliche Weilerbach... commented 2025-06-20 05:19:34 UTC by MichS ♦152 |
 | 167852506 (Comments: 1) | ralley (Discussed changesets: 40) | Source was "survey;Mapillary" commented 2025-06-20 05:15:11 UTC by ralley ♦604 |
| 167849779 (Comments: 1) | tomyak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello again Tom, You also don't want to do this thing where you break down a feature into parts like you do with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396718878. You'll want to draw the rough as a single polygon and the two bunkers insi... commented 2025-06-20 05:04:10 UTC by b-jazz ♦636 |
| 161559046 (Comments: 1) | Bvand7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and thank you for your edits! Unfortunately, copying from Google Maps (and other maps in general) is not allowed for copyright reasons (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google), so these changes have been reverted, which is standard ... commented 2025-06-20 04:50:17 UTC by OrichalcumCosmonaut ♦1 |
| 167851746 (Comments: 1) | Flounder71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | new to this. use his data maps at work that cost money. commented 2025-06-20 04:15:10 UTC by Flounder71 ♦1 |
| 166891555 (Comments: 1) | RAHinton_Import (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this import is of bad quality as the ways are often not connected to each other. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=107.31982&lat=57.05298&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends... commented 2025-06-20 03:52:28 UTC by ratrun ♦231 |
| 167851337 (Comments: 1) | tntchn (Discussed changesets: 20) | 前一陣子入口工程完工，但因為沒有空照圖，所以先用大概的路徑把行走路徑連起來，並修正了一些近期更新的圖徵 commented 2025-06-20 03:51:04 UTC by tntchn ♦22 |
| 167806012 (Comments: 1) | lephan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, osmi detects a problem here https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.16720&lat=-35.20780&zoom=16 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9592514 commented 2025-06-20 03:49:27 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
| 165194583 (Comments: 2) | Yui2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | should be shop=food, fixed commented 2025-06-20 03:12:15 UTC by Yui2 ♦4 |
| 36351492 (Comments: 1) | 随风-125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 请问 relation 5825698 这段交限为啥用了 route=tram commented 2025-06-20 02:23:39 UTC by hahae ♦2 |
| 167843548 (Comments: 1) | the13thsense (Discussed changesets: 24) | It is recommended that gates not be placed on the vertex were two roads meet. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-06-20 02:15:22 UTC by Udarian ♦395 |
| 167815458 (Comments: 1) | anautiyal_lyft (Discussed changesets: 5) | This is not correct there is no through road commented 2025-06-20 00:37:52 UTC by cubbe8 ♦51 |
| 167847998 (Comments: 1) | DMilechin (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is not complete commented 2025-06-20 00:35:05 UTC by cubbe8 ♦51 |
| 167812155 (Comments: 3) | Dan123iel (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for confirming. commented 2025-06-19 23:49:28 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167679682 (Comments: 4) | Maik Luh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gerne. Die haben vor etwa 3 Wochen die Schilder entfernt gehabt. commented 2025-06-19 23:47:03 UTC by Maik Luh ♦1 |
| 167847704 (Comments: 1) | Webstach (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-06-19 23:20:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167837656 (Comments: 1) | DKTR99921222 (Discussed changesets: 4) | To iste, nezmyselny vymaz existujuceho bodu a vytvorenie noveho so stratou dobrych udajov. commented 2025-06-19 23:07:20 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,559 |
| 167799695 (Comments: 2) | AITOOOL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je me suis permis de revert ce changeset, en attente de discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167847619 commented 2025-06-19 23:06:42 UTC by jcnl44 ♦8 |
| 167837683 (Comments: 1) | DKTR99921222 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Preco ste vymazali existujuci bod a nahradili novym, pricom ste stratili dobre udaje a pridali vase sporne? Takto sa to nerobi. commented 2025-06-19 23:03:20 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,559 |
| 167810586 (Comments: 1) | Vicolapatat (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396508041 is not a horse riding centre (leisure=horse_riding), it is a horse riding arena (probably belonging to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12925272517 (Les Ecuries Smith-Huet). In OSM riding arenas ... commented 2025-06-19 23:01:03 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦742 |
| 154538076 (Comments: 1) | shlerksofftorobots (Discussed changesets: 7) | To co oznaczyłeś jako basen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304326310 nie jest obiektem stały tylko tymczasowym. Takich nie nanosimy w OSM. Tak naprawdę to obszar pradopodobnie betonowy na którym był ustawiony składany okrągły basen... commented 2025-06-19 22:54:41 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167813049 (Comments: 1) | Dan123iel (Discussed changesets: 5) | I think on the basis that we mark the additional lane from when it starts, even if it's still to narrow to use at that point, it's okay to say this has 4 lanes total (2 for right turn) even though it only becomes wide enough for two further... commented 2025-06-19 22:53:18 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 163133941 (Comments: 1) | shlerksofftorobots (Discussed changesets: 7) | Z jakiego powodu ten fragment drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/920271721#map=19/49.788180/20.507640&layers=N zmieniłeś z residential na track ? commented 2025-06-19 22:49:02 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167813273 (Comments: 1) | Dan123iel (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks. That's fine, just you had a typo in "slight_right" which I've fixed. commented 2025-06-19 22:49:01 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167818778 (Comments: 1) | PainWithChocolate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zwischen Alter Hattinger Straße und Clemensstraße ist der Weg ziemlich schmal, schlecht gekennzeichnet, und ohne irgendeine Beschilderung. Führen die getrennten Pfade jetzt nicht dazu, dass es wie ein gut separierter Radweg aussieht? commented 2025-06-19 22:47:24 UTC by 00001111222233334444 ♦2 |
| 167777742 (Comments: 1) | Father Nature Landscapes of Tacoma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the contribution. I noticed a couple things while reviewing your first changeset. First, it looks like you accidentally removed the highway tag from a segment of E Portland Ave. This was causing data consumers to not know this wa... commented 2025-06-19 22:45:03 UTC by pwbriggs ♦34 |
| 167846906 (Comments: 1) | Bence_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | source=survey commented 2025-06-19 22:40:30 UTC by Bence_ ♦4 |
| 167439020 (Comments: 3) | Roof Pro Woodinville (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, thanks for the info. They both link to the same Facebook, so I was wondering if these two associated shops are different. commented 2025-06-19 22:38:39 UTC by pwbriggs ♦34 |
| 161968501 (Comments: 5) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Nehmen wir mal als Beispiel den ersten Parkplatz im Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316637413 Dieser ist nur zu erreichen, wenn man die Straße über die Grundstückszufahrt verlässt und dann auf diesem dann parkt. ... commented 2025-06-19 22:36:29 UTC by mgerken ♦72 |
| 167762418 (Comments: 2) | tomyak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for the feedback, i will go in and try this tonight with some edits! commented 2025-06-19 22:30:47 UTC by tomyak ♦2 |
| 167806865 (Comments: 1) | RobotLeezy (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396492886 First, can you explain why you split the fairway in half like that? You shouldn't be doing this and I've seen a handful of people do this and I'm trying to make sure it never happ... commented 2025-06-19 22:08:12 UTC by b-jazz ♦636 |
| 167846580 (Comments: 1) | meisoof (Discussed changesets: 8) | *foot path commented 2025-06-19 22:04:50 UTC by meisoof ♦5 |
| 167834328 (Comments: 2) | rui228 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Olá. Fiz a atualização com base dos problemas e avisos do ID do OSM. Atualizações sugeridas: + name=Decathlon commented 2025-06-19 21:53:29 UTC by rui228 ♦30 |
| 167845925 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “… as well as along "Annastraße" …” commented 2025-06-19 21:51:17 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167785283 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 258) | Dzisiaj jechałem tym odcinkiem, to DK 20 do Żukowa dalej jest oznaczona jako DK 20. Dopiero na północ od DK 7 zostało usunięte oznakowanie DK 20. commented 2025-06-19 21:43:27 UTC by theDM ♦82 |
 | 167845613 (Comments: 1) | EnriXXel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! There was already an area here with a camp site tag on it. I removed your added node. commented 2025-06-19 21:31:49 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦600 |
| 167596120 (Comments: 4) | rigilk3nt (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi rigilk3nt, Ich habe die Busrouten aus dem Changeset durch relatify.monicz.dev geschickt, so dass sie nun alle wieder passen müssten. Bei der T-Kreuzung habe ich auch geschaut, aber das müssten die gleichen Verbindungen sein. |
| 167757859 (Comments: 7) | Wandel-Appeltje (Discussed changesets: 31) | Up to you.. Hakuna Matata commented 2025-06-19 21:30:26 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167841416 (Comments: 1) | morskoyjoj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Пожалуйста, не используйте Google Maps, у нас нет разрешения на них. Но можно использовать Яндекс.Панорамы Ещё, в правом меню редактора ест... commented 2025-06-19 21:29:37 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 167825759 (Comments: 1) | _yellow_boots (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-06-19 21:27:50 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 167816364 (Comments: 1) | sorrowjke (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-06-19 21:26:01 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 167731791 (Comments: 3) | Amsvartnir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tackar! commented 2025-06-19 21:25:05 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦600 |
| 167843525 (Comments: 2) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 176) | Please don´t do anything. I am working on this. regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167843525 commented 2025-06-19 21:06:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,334 |
| 167752975 (Comments: 2) | LukeyBear (Discussed changesets: 4) | It appears to be a continuation of this mechanical edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167752325 commented 2025-06-19 21:04:08 UTC by InsertUser ♦443 |
| 167799236 (Comments: 4) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 176) | Unfortunately, the work is probably lost since the changes you made don't appear in this changeset. commented 2025-06-19 20:50:22 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,066 |
| 145443100 (Comments: 5) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 580) | Nawet na zdjęciach z 2024 roku nadal są schody i chodniki. commented 2025-06-19 20:38:36 UTC by YomanNH ♦303 |
| 167823672 (Comments: 1) | xhosch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo xhosch :) Danke für die Verbesserung der Daten auf OpenStreetMap. Ich bin einer der griechischen Freiwilligen und schreibe dir, weil ich gesehen habe, dass du um eine Überprüfung deines Änderungssatzes gebeten hast: h... commented 2025-06-19 20:37:10 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦120 |
| 167841440 (Comments: 1) | Harry Preiß (Discussed changesets: 1) | bicycle=no ist nicht korrekt, es muss bicycle=use_sidepath sein. Gilt auch für die Ändeurngen in den anderen Changesets. commented 2025-06-19 20:34:47 UTC by monotar ♦81 |
| 165729996 (Comments: 2) | Anónimo785612 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I just corrected it, thanks for letting me know. commented 2025-06-19 20:30:20 UTC by Anónimo785612 ♦5 |
| 167758154 (Comments: 4) | SuperMarkus (Discussed changesets: 15) | Wie du das Tagging empfindest, kannst du gerne mit dem OSM-Wiki ausdiskutieren, denn Beispielfotos zu Paths ohne Tags wie "surface=paved" sind irgendwelche Trampelpfade. Wenn du die Tags ändern willst, werde ich dich in keinster Weise ... commented 2025-06-19 20:26:33 UTC by SuperMarkus ♦14 |
| 167143047 (Comments: 4) | kadiwa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Valhalla hat's eh nicht so mit oneway-Tags: es denkt sogar, dass man in Fußgängerzonen nur in eine Richtung gehen darf, wenn oneway=yes eingetragen ist ;) https://valhalla.openstreetmap.de/directions?profile=pedestrian&wps=-3.2... commented 2025-06-19 20:10:52 UTC by kadiwa ♦31 |
| 164909617 (Comments: 1) | Andrej Justus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Soweit ich weiß, ist der Weg mit Zeichen 240 ausgeschildert. Warum hast Du die vorher korrekten Tags dennoch wieder entfernt? Bitte sieh Dir dazu auch auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren an, wie ein G... commented 2025-06-19 20:09:45 UTC by hsc666 ♦464 |
| 167806221 (Comments: 2) | Spaghetti Monster🍝 (Discussed changesets: 202) | There was a problem indeed with the upload. Somehow, there were no deletions associated with the numerous segmentations I did with some highways, resulting in the existence of both new segments and the older ones. Still, it was an easy fix and a matt... commented 2025-06-19 20:08:44 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,334 |
| X | 167815758 (Comments: 2) | mikedld (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you go to https://www.burgerking.pt/pt/store-locator you'll see the website making a request to https://www.burgerking.pt/api/whitelabel when loading the page, and that endpoint returns the data that contains the refs. In this particular case... commented 2025-06-19 19:57:38 UTC by mikedld ♦24 |
| 167836805 (Comments: 1) | kmenard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Next time can you make these separate changes so the changeset doesn't cover 50% of the country? Thanks commented 2025-06-19 19:40:06 UTC by Parl_ ♦2 |
| 167687456 (Comments: 3) | Jörg Roßdeutscher (Discussed changesets: 15) | Vielen Dank für den Aufwand :) commented 2025-06-19 19:39:46 UTC by kadiwa ♦31 |
| 167842233 (Comments: 2) | sjwhitak (Discussed changesets: 8) | I have added houses in here, but it's fine to delete those. It was maybe 10 minutes of work; it'll be super tedious to un-edit the other ones. commented 2025-06-19 19:38:23 UTC by sjwhitak ♦8 |
| 167822851 (Comments: 6) | M GM (Discussed changesets: 17) | Okay, I'll correct commented 2025-06-19 19:32:14 UTC by M GM ♦5 |
| 167838465 (Comments: 1) | Koło Lasu- wypożyczalnia sprzętu sportowo rekreacyjnego (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wycofano zgodnie z komentarzem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167839281 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167842013 commented 2025-06-19 19:25:40 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167838405 (Comments: 1) | Koło Lasu- wypożyczalnia sprzętu sportowo rekreacyjnego (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wycofano zgodnie z komentarzem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167839281 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167842013 commented 2025-06-19 19:25:40 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167839281 (Comments: 2) | Koło Lasu- wypożyczalnia sprzętu sportowo rekreacyjnego (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wycofano zgodnie z komentarzem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167839281 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167842013 commented 2025-06-19 19:25:40 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167838729 (Comments: 1) | Koło Lasu- wypożyczalnia sprzętu sportowo rekreacyjnego (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wycofano zgodnie z komentarzem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167839281 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167842013 commented 2025-06-19 19:25:40 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167689803 (Comments: 4) | Tom267 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Chris, No need to apologise at all and good question about the signs on the ground etc. Some of the area are fire breaks rather than paths and some are garden/cut grass areas that arean't paths at all. There are 'private' t... commented 2025-06-19 19:25:07 UTC by Tom267 ♦1 |
| 167841872 (Comments: 1) | Stefanovr (Discussed changesets: 1) | s c commented 2025-06-19 19:22:04 UTC by Stefanovr ♦1 |
| 167814263 (Comments: 2) | Rowemu (Discussed changesets: 2) | I'm sorry, you are totally right. I just forgot to document before using the tag. The documentary is now online https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee:icom_member commented 2025-06-19 19:11:42 UTC by Rowemu ♦1 |
| 167828634 (Comments: 1) | Silentwriter_15 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi :) Sieht schon alles ziemlich gut aus, was du so machst. Eine Fragen hätte ich: Findet der Weihnachstmarkt nicht mehr statt? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... commented 2025-06-19 18:58:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167799256 (Comments: 2) | swietowarty2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dodatkowo: OpenStreetMap (przynajmniej z poziomu edytorów map OSM) nie służy do robienia mapek na wydarzenia. Od tego są inne programy. Inaczej sprawa by wyglądała, gdyby wraz ze zmianą dostalibyśmy prośbę o wykasowanie tych informacj... commented 2025-06-19 18:54:18 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
 | 160651437 (Comments: 2) | MenKauRa (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hello, dear woodpeck... the thing is that there are several reasons for this.. one of the reasons is the wrong name in Russian, and you are right that I should have noted this in the comments... another reason is that our state language is Az... commented 2025-06-19 18:48:32 UTC by MenKauRa ♦28 |
| 167809481 (Comments: 1) | Silentwriter_15 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi :) warum löscht du die Grundstückszufahrt und den Parkplatz? Bei der Firma, die du gelöscht hast, wäre es vielleicht hilfreich gewesen, die Adresse in der Karte zu lassen, da dieser Ort jede einzelne Adresse gebra... commented 2025-06-19 18:42:52 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167737706 (Comments: 1) | Silentwriter_15 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi :) du hast hier das Gebäude mit dem Verlauf der Landnutzungsbegrenzung verbunden. Das ist laut Luftbild nicht gegeben und sollte dringend vermieden werden. Ich hab das mal angepasst. Guck dir das Ergebnis vielleicht mal an. Au&s... commented 2025-06-19 18:39:56 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167829746 (Comments: 1) | Numac (Discussed changesets: 28) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396598176 As mentioned in previous comments on your changesets, golf course elements like bunkers and fairways shouldn't intersect each other. They can share boundary nodes sometimes, but they can�... commented 2025-06-19 18:39:36 UTC by b-jazz ♦636 |
| 133392165 (Comments: 3) | runcio (Discussed changesets: 10) | Balstoties uz citām kartētāja izmaiņām, drošvien no kaut kādiem pašvaldības dokumentiem, iespējams iekšējiem. Pateikšu tikai, ka jebkurā gadījumā, tā kā autors neatbild uz izmaiņu kopu komentāriem un avotu ... commented 2025-06-19 18:37:59 UTC by HellMap ♦672 |
| 167833863 (Comments: 2) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 12) | Weggehaald. commented 2025-06-19 18:37:42 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦8 |
| 167840006 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 46) | OSM policy for names is to use the name that is used locally (but with a preference for signed names). Both names are signed in this case but the more locally used name is likely to be the English language name. Currently, there are under 1,00... commented 2025-06-19 18:24:18 UTC by eerib ♦100 |
| 167188929 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi vanessatryfi, thanks for your contribution! Boris & Horton is already mapped as a cafe node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5603534984) so I added the dog=yes tag there. It's part of an existing building, so drawing it as its own buil... commented 2025-06-19 18:17:31 UTC by jmapb ♦401 |
| 167820453 (Comments: 2) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 120) | If you want any more tips nearby, then you might be interested in my tool at https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/#14/51.7528/-1.2853 commented 2025-06-19 18:15:47 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦271 |
| 167803498 (Comments: 1) | Iexist1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Their website says they moved commented 2025-06-19 18:10:20 UTC by Iexist1 ♦1 |
| 167792501 (Comments: 2) | adrianmg13 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Se han eliminado nodos de manera injustificada en este changeset. Los restauro commented 2025-06-19 17:50:18 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,623 |
| X | 167806056 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 357) | Thank you for contributing :-). Your changeset crosses many regions. In the future, please retain your changeset as smaller (local). Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the da... commented 2025-06-19 17:46:51 UTC by Javierpf ♦106 |
| X | 164876633 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 122) | Thank you for contributing :-). Your changeset crosses many regions. In the future, please retain your changeset as smaller (local). Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the da... commented 2025-06-19 17:45:35 UTC by Javierpf ♦106 |
| 167833929 (Comments: 1) | Lars26-50 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Du hast selbst schon gemerkt, dass das Verbinden von Hydranten mit der Straße keine gute Idee ist und es korrigiert. Daher: zum Hydranten keine Anmerkung. Was mir da... commented 2025-06-19 17:43:05 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
 | 167765390 (Comments: 1) | Phút (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Phút, can you explain on what basis you changed the Vietnam border in this changeset? Also, please make it a habit to use "good changeset comments" as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comme... commented 2025-06-19 17:38:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,413 |
| 167765837 (Comments: 2) | Phút (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Tewuzij, please be friendlier in your interactions with other mappers. User Phút has only been with OSM for a few days, and while they did make a mistake here, there's no reason to shout commands at them in capital letters. commented 2025-06-19 17:35:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,413 |
| 167834893 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Tewuzij, please don't just revert a changeset created by another mapper - explain why you feel a revert is necessary, and inform the other mapper why you did a revert. If something is disputed, seek a consensus in the community before you ... commented 2025-06-19 17:32:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,413 |
| 167752050 (Comments: 4) | Ellie Moon (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.vgcc.edu/about-us/consumer-information/copyright/ commented 2025-06-19 17:21:31 UTC by txemt ♦69 |
| 167830071 (Comments: 2) | anghenfil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dann dürften dass da 7,40 gewesen sein (mit Parkstreifen). commented 2025-06-19 17:19:34 UTC by anghenfil ♦1 |
| 167832200 (Comments: 1) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 31) | Wim, Ik heb deze changeset reverted. Er liggen daar een hele bult bus- en fietsroutes, die allemaal stuk zijn door deze changeset. Die fietsroutes kan ik nog repareren, maar die busroutes niet, er zit daar een start- en eindhalte en daar... commented 2025-06-19 17:17:38 UTC by dvdhoven ♦917 |
| 167831140 (Comments: 1) | LegrandJ (Discussed changesets: 42) | Cher LegrandJ / Tommy3009. Tournai n'est pas une commune à facilités, personne ne vous a demandé de traduire les noms des arrêts de bus à Tournai ou partout ailleurs. Surtout pas dans le champ "name... commented 2025-06-19 17:14:43 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,463 |
| 165731662 (Comments: 4) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 12) | Sorry dat ik niet reageerde op je reactie. commented 2025-06-19 17:10:13 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦8 |
| 167346499 (Comments: 2) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 12) | Volgens mij is dat nu inmiddels wel door iemand anders gedaan. Sorry dat ik zo laat iets van mij liet horen. commented 2025-06-19 17:05:19 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦8 |
| 167346719 (Comments: 3) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ik weet niet hoe jullie dat doen? Het intekenen? commented 2025-06-19 17:03:25 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦8 |
| 167350659 (Comments: 2) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vanaf 10 juni begonnen de graafwerkzaamheden dus ik dacht ik voeg het alvast nu toe. Iets te voorbarig denk ik nu. Na de zomervakantie begint natuurlijk de echte bouw. commented 2025-06-19 17:00:21 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦8 |
| 167348027 (Comments: 3) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 12) | Sorry hiervoor Ik dacht dat het hele gebouw gesloopt zou worden, maar heb niet goed genoeg gekeken. Sorry dat ik zo laat reageerde. commented 2025-06-19 16:55:41 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦8 |
| 167829560 (Comments: 2) | Marc B V (Discussed changesets: 2) | *ovviamente entrance=main è l'unico tag che hai posizionato correttamente ;-) commented 2025-06-19 16:35:05 UTC by demon_box ♦357 |
| 164938899 (Comments: 1) | HPG_64 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo HPG_64, Da ist die Einbahnstraße am Kreisverkehr etwas zu lang geraten - Durchfahrt nach Norden nicht mehr möglich... https://osmcha.org/changesets/164938899#map=15/48.47233/8.93177&layers=N Habe es korrigiert. |
| 139258701 (Comments: 3) | Tsur Halamish (Discussed changesets: 62) | *בטוחים במקלטים!* תושבות ותושבים יקרים, אנו שבים ומזכירים- ברחבי העיר עומדים לרשותכם עשרות מקלטים ומחסות מוגנים תקניים. ❇️ מחובר... commented 2025-06-19 16:28:21 UTC by Tsur Halamish ♦51 |
 | 165558956 (Comments: 1) | מבני הנביאים (Discussed changesets: 2) | שלום ותודה על התוספות למפה. אני מניח שטעות הוספת תגית colour לנחל אז כדאי למחוק אותה. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420043060 commented 2025-06-19 16:22:41 UTC by hatul ♦340 |
| 167731542 (Comments: 1) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 67) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/loschen-heute-hydrant/131606 commented 2025-06-19 16:13:56 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,037 |
| 167832281 (Comments: 1) | MoeBerg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag MoeBerg.. tip... format phone=+31.... Kijk je nog even. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-19 16:04:19 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 166080653 (Comments: 4) | MapleTrees (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've updated it with those tags. Does it look right now? commented 2025-06-19 15:56:33 UTC by MapleTrees ♦4 |
| 167833012 (Comments: 1) | bugikgeolas (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-06-19 15:50:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167733416 (Comments: 4) | arthurzam (Discussed changesets: 3) | אפשר, במקביל, לפנות לממפה ולבקש שהוא יפסיק למפות וימחק את מה שכבר מופה. אפשר להסביר שהמתקנים האלו מגינים על חייהם של אזרחים וחשיפת מיקומ... commented 2025-06-19 15:43:49 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
| 167773311 (Comments: 1) | Noahknolton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Noah, I've removed the mess of triangles around the golf course. I don't know what you were trying to accomplish, but many adjoining triangles is not the answer. Also, a body of water that far from a golf hole is not normally c... commented 2025-06-19 15:43:35 UTC by b-jazz ♦636 |
| 167832263 (Comments: 2) | الهلالي قسورة العرب (Discussed changesets: 10) | You're removing extremely valuable information commented 2025-06-19 15:43:06 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
| 167820904 (Comments: 1) | MrBartek (Discussed changesets: 19) | Dorzuć jeszcze tag source:maxspeed. Łatwiej wtedy robić automatyczne edycje w przypadku zmiany prawa. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:source:maxspeed commented 2025-06-19 15:37:33 UTC by SpinOff ♦269 |
| 167826500 (Comments: 1) | cyberatlas (Discussed changesets: 104) | Rzucisz okiem na tę uwagę? Wygląda jakby można ją było już rozwiązać. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4542455 commented 2025-06-19 15:34:48 UTC by SpinOff ♦269 |
| 167826104 (Comments: 1) | Jakaka2222 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag Jakaka... Volgens mij sluiten de relatiedelen netjes aan. Gr eggie commented 2025-06-19 15:18:35 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167829944 (Comments: 2) | Trần Xuân (Discussed changesets: 1) | Right, understood. I took from Vietnamese Assembly source (https://quochoi.vn/tintuc/Pages/tin-hoat-dong-cua-quoc-hoi.aspx?ItemID=94603). Is this one good? commented 2025-06-19 15:17:53 UTC by Trần Xuân ♦1 |
| 163680810 (Comments: 3) | cavixsd (Discussed changesets: 9) | W tej nowej edycji porobił trochę baboli ale lokalizacyjnie obiekty się praktycznie zgadzały. Powiedzmy węzeł dodany na szczycie masztu przeniosłem na podstawę. Maszty po poprzednikach przywróciłem do stanu poprzedniego. Te nowe przer... commented 2025-06-19 15:17:19 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167819090 (Comments: 1) | foxywolf156 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for contribution! Please use name tag only for actual place name and not for amenity explanation. If name is not known - just don't add it. commented 2025-06-19 15:12:54 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 167828045 (Comments: 2) | tim147 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tim De adressen heb ik weer verwijderd. Gr eggie commented 2025-06-19 15:04:22 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167692530 (Comments: 2) | GreyCountyGIS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, this account is managed by Grey County GIS staff. We are updating road information on OSM from authoritative road data. Grey County GIS has chosen to support the OSM platform and will be updating road information moving forward. commented 2025-06-19 14:59:24 UTC by GreyCountyGIS ♦1 |
| 167645602 (Comments: 1) | cavixsd (Discussed changesets: 9) | Proszę przeczytaj i zastosuj się do https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-06-19 14:55:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167772688 (Comments: 3) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 149) | restore it so that it shows again as a restaurant on the map, but setting its opening hours to "off". OK commented 2025-06-19 14:41:32 UTC by Christian Materne ♦1 |
| 167778240 (Comments: 3) | vietnam321 (Discussed changesets: 12) | And also, is there a way to import OSM data into OHM? I would feel safe to delete boundaries only when I could archive it there commented 2025-06-19 14:36:48 UTC by Tewuzij ♦8 |
| 167767113 (Comments: 3) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 101) | Nein, StreetComplete fragt explizit nach oneway-Tag, wenn keiner eingetragen ist und der Weg einen geringen width-Wert hat. commented 2025-06-19 14:28:20 UTC by Bienson ♦291 |
| 167828803 (Comments: 1) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-06-19 14:20:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167757629 (Comments: 2) | markisraki742 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wszystkie zestawy zmian użytkownika są opisane kropką. Zgłosiłbym, by poszedł blok od DWG dla nauczki. commented 2025-06-19 14:13:43 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 34384331 (Comments: 5) | larsvemund (Discussed changesets: 2) | det er egentlig bare å finne polygonet/multipolygonet "Vardåsen naturreservat" (altså https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863100098 ) og sette samme tag på den. hvorvidt det skal være bicycle=no eller bicycle... commented 2025-06-19 14:08:28 UTC by anderfo ♦111 |
| 167821840 (Comments: 1) | الهلالي قسورة العرب (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, I would like to point out that you have repeatedly deleted Amazigh names (in Tifinagh or latin) in this area. These names are part of the local linguistic heritage and are important for OSM's inclusive mapping. I urge you to cease this... commented 2025-06-19 13:57:13 UTC by TnWarrior ♦2 |
| 167811959 (Comments: 1) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 44) | too big changeset area --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167811959 commented 2025-06-19 13:42:34 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦45 |
| 167811845 (Comments: 1) | DanBrady (Discussed changesets: 1) | too big changeset area --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167811845 commented 2025-06-19 13:41:53 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦45 |
| 167653807 (Comments: 6) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 93) | Het laatste stuk is ook niet ingetekend. Zodra daar aan gebouwd wordt komt die erbij als highway=construction natuurlijk. Wat ingetekend is, is af. Hij staat duidelijk op access=private, waardoor navigatiesoftware hem niet gebruikt, en kaarten hem to... commented 2025-06-19 13:41:29 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦642 |
| 167823884 (Comments: 4) | ImagiCart (Discussed changesets: 2) | Denk dat het zo wel kan, want in de parktijk 'kruisen' auto's ook binnenlangs. commented 2025-06-19 13:38:53 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167817167 (Comments: 7) | bikemaper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wiki jest dobrym źródłem wiedzy i gdyby coś zostało ustalone na forum, to też będzie zapisane na wiki, ale na forum też można np. zapytać jak zmapować trudniejsze rzeczy lub przedyskutować edycje na dużą skalę. commented 2025-06-19 13:24:25 UTC by pavvv ♦467 |
| 167739080 (Comments: 2) | Hopla57 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Salut, Bien vu, je n'avais pas pensé à Panoramax. Après, les photos ne sont pas bien ajustées et il reste des choses à faire sur la zone. À+ commented 2025-06-19 13:19:23 UTC by Hopla57 ♦44 |
| 167823646 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 827) | Thanks, didn't catch the typo commented 2025-06-19 13:09:31 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
| 167736864 (Comments: 2) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Supaplex, thank you for reverting the changeset. While I have referred the wiki for information on classification based on shields, during the reevaluation of my changes I also found the dedicated note about The Zhongshan Elevated Road. I have inc... commented 2025-06-19 13:01:09 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦29 |
| 167818565 (Comments: 1) | pafgoku (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. I don't understand what you mean in this changeset. This road is one way (south-->north) in the first segment. Please explain, thanks commented 2025-06-19 12:57:05 UTC by dp7 ♦31 |
| 167824068 (Comments: 3) | daankerk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke, dat zal nu vast wel lukken. Ik heb de node iets naar achteren geplaatst. Hij stond buiten het gebouw al lijkt dat op een foto niet zo. Groet eggie commented 2025-06-19 12:53:10 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167656982 (Comments: 2) | Fabianbuecheler (Discussed changesets: 47) | Bezeichnung vom Parkplatz wieder entfernt commented 2025-06-19 12:48:37 UTC by aw_LT ♦12 |
| 167657181 (Comments: 2) | Fabianbuecheler (Discussed changesets: 47) | der Name wurde wieder entfernt, sofern es da eine Firma gibt, bitte auf separatem Node taggen commented 2025-06-19 12:48:08 UTC by aw_LT ♦12 |
| 167824194 (Comments: 1) | daankerk (Discussed changesets: 2) | De gebouwomtrek heb ik hersteld. Die dakranden tellen niet mee met de vorm van het gebouw in het Kadaster. daar zit geen gebouw onder. Bij herïmport wordt anders toch je wijziging overschreven. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-19 12:47:41 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 119067792 (Comments: 2) | Глеб (Discussed changesets: 51) | пожалуйста, уточните объект. вероятно, я подразумевал, что этот тег не имеет смысла. С тем же успехом можно писать natural=no commented 2025-06-19 12:42:28 UTC by Глеб ♦134 |
| 167823989 (Comments: 2) | Vonder23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb de BAG adresnode hersteld. Die was verwijderd zag ik en opnieuw aangemaakt. commented 2025-06-19 12:41:59 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167821976 (Comments: 1) | Ali Dingemans (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Er stond hier al een picnictafel op de kaart. Staan er soms twee? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-19 12:07:20 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167821589 (Comments: 1) | hughrawlinson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Het is geen adresnode.. dus de hele node mag weg. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-19 12:04:36 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167816987 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …” commented 2025-06-19 11:58:10 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167816669 (Comments: 3) | Azbestcik (Discussed changesets: 176) | Budowa gazociągu w lesie zakończyła się jakoś na początku tego roku. Jak tylko się pojawiałem w tym lesie to jak było to możliwe starałem się mapować zgodnie z obecnym stanem. Byłem wczoraj i żadne prace nie mają miejsca. Masz rację ... commented 2025-06-19 11:55:06 UTC by Azbestcik ♦185 |
 | 167810260 (Comments: 1) | Михаил_13_13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | только не копируйте данные со сторонних карт commented 2025-06-19 11:52:57 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
 | 155643413 (Comments: 1) | Andriy Pavlyuk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Доброго дня! У цьому пакеті правок Вами було переміщено вершину гори Мала Кепута і додано на її колишнє місце гору з назвою «Кепута»... commented 2025-06-19 11:52:29 UTC by Yu_llis ♦10 |
| 167781895 (Comments: 2) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Thank you for pointing this out, as I meant to tag the entire path under the reservoir as historic, but only remembered to do a small part near the Windsor Dam before saving. I will go ahead and tackle this in the coming days, as I meant to do so bef... commented 2025-06-19 11:51:28 UTC by Ktr101 ♦22 |
| 167821747 (Comments: 1) | LegrandJ (Discussed changesets: 42) | ⚠️ Votre changement a été effacé. La communauté belge d’OSM a décidé en 2024 que les noms (rues, arrêts de bus…) doivent être écrits en version bilingue dans les com... commented 2025-06-19 11:49:25 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,463 |
| 167767430 (Comments: 1) | kendalroy (Discussed changesets: 1) | good job! commented 2025-06-19 11:43:59 UTC by wriothesley_main ♦1 |
| 167821529 (Comments: 1) | lukubuku (Discussed changesets: 21) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356603352 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-06-19 11:30:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167821425 (Comments: 1) | WiFox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-06-19 11:30:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167784900 (Comments: 1) | Adim169 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ciao, quando cambi i nomi delle vie le attività mappate con indirizzo con il vecchio nome della via rimangono "senza" indirizzo perché i nomi non coincidono più Per favore controlla sempre che non ci siano indirizzi ... commented 2025-06-19 11:30:43 UTC by George Sears ♦63 |
| 167776963 (Comments: 1) | Olaf Skwarski (Discussed changesets: 8) | Co znaczy "wjazd", jak dokonałeś zmian na prawie 400 obiektach? Łomianki są owszem wjazdem do Warszawy, ale to nie znaczy, żeby tak nazywać tak obszerny zestaw zmian. Który, swoją drogą, ostrzegł, że chciałeś wgrać nieko... commented 2025-06-19 11:28:01 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 167821197 (Comments: 1) | jb54osm (Discussed changesets: 33) | Prima de tijdelijke weg. commented 2025-06-19 11:26:25 UTC by Leo Olijerhoek VRHM ♦7 |
| 167538313 (Comments: 21) | Leo Olijerhoek VRHM (Discussed changesets: 39) | Updates van het plein adhv satellietfoto's 16-6-2025: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167821197#map=18/52.140876/4.486206&layers=N commented 2025-06-19 11:21:27 UTC by jb54osm ♦173 |
| 167818529 (Comments: 1) | Mika83AC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und willkommen bei OSM, bitte geschlossene Einrichtungen nicht einfach löschen, sondern ein https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167821298 nutzen, speziell wenn das Ladenlokal noch existiert. Ich habe das umgesetzt: https://www.op... commented 2025-06-19 11:21:00 UTC by aixbrick ♦835 |
| 167550386 (Comments: 4) | 9r8k (Discussed changesets: 2) | Grazie per l'offerta ma sono stato a Roma solo per vacanza e per visitare un'amica chi viene da Roma. In bocca al lupo per la gruppa OSM di Roma! Sarebbe un po' triste se non ci fossero abbastanza persone chi si interessano di OSM in u... commented 2025-06-19 10:53:33 UTC by 9r8k ♦3 |
| 165554354 (Comments: 1) | Derkoenig (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hallo DerKienig, Habe ich deine Abbiegebeschränkung richtig korrigiert? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19053712/history Gruß Metzor commented 2025-06-19 10:51:50 UTC by Metzor ♦364 |
| 167819920 (Comments: 1) | ila1312 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag ila... Wat is je bron in deze? Alle tagging komt uit de data van ProRail. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-19 10:50:36 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167819704 (Comments: 1) | ila1312 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-19 10:46:46 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 147271018 (Comments: 1) | Centrum Edukacji Ekologicznej w Czechowicach-Dziedzicach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Określeń typu ,,Przepust wodny'' nie należy dawać w name, ewentualnie w description. commented 2025-06-19 10:46:21 UTC by VA00 ♦580 |
| 167816093 (Comments: 1) | Joeswe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-19 10:37:28 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167816088 (Comments: 1) | BerndMF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-19 10:33:24 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 156936039 (Comments: 5) | 캔디레인 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Have you posted to imports@openstreetmap.org mailing list as required? Note that undiscussed imports can be reverted by anyone, at any time, without warning or further reason to do so (just "not discussed import" is good enough) commented 2025-06-19 10:23:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
 | 167809925 (Comments: 1) | HtikeEasy CoLtd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't edit the entire buildings. You don't occupy all of it. commented 2025-06-19 10:23:19 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,532 |
| 79786177 (Comments: 2) | drspa44 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I don't know if there is any trace remaining of this particular segment. This part was mapped solely using Out of copyright OS Map, Hertfordshire XXXIX.NE, Revised: 1896, Published: 1899 commented 2025-06-19 10:12:57 UTC by drspa44 ♦3 |
| 167483405 (Comments: 5) | Adam Hauner (Discussed changesets: 3) | All is fine, fixed now. Unfortunately iD is a very bad editor, we instruct all local mappers to not take any of its "advice". Good luck! commented 2025-06-19 10:07:42 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,948 |
| 167810769 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be “… "Murhardstraße" …” commented 2025-06-19 10:05:07 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 165998410 (Comments: 3) | geologist877 (Discussed changesets: 1) | if value for shop was set, then amenity=fixme may be removed I will do it commented 2025-06-19 10:02:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 143724013 (Comments: 1) | EsthersGeo (Discussed changesets: 11) | v3 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574835459/history/3 commented 2025-06-19 10:00:53 UTC by Enock4seth ♦548 |
| 143706312 (Comments: 1) | EsthersGeo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, do not remove useful tags added by local mappers and add duplicates as in the case of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574835459/history v2 I have restored commented 2025-06-19 10:00:21 UTC by Enock4seth ♦548 |
| 165432616 (Comments: 2) | Jörg Roßdeutscher (Discussed changesets: 15) | Moin Hauke, hm… SCEE (damit arbeite ich) bietet die Wegequalität abhängig von der Oberfläche an, nicht absolut, und auch entsprechend bebildert. Es gibt daher für „exzellenden Asphalt“ eine anders bebilderte Aus... commented 2025-06-19 09:58:37 UTC by Jörg Roßdeutscher ♦14 |
| 116146009 (Comments: 2) | Mauls (Discussed changesets: 126) | is there any trace remaining of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764899747 nowadays? Or at time of mapping? is it mapped solely based on old maps? commented 2025-06-19 09:56:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167657021 (Comments: 3) | gion274 (Discussed changesets: 12) | ciao, ho realizzato che probabilmente ti riferivi non alla relaziome ma al nodo 12917614637. Nella destination la wiki dice di riportare quello che è scritto nel cartello (quindi abbreviazioni incluse e rispetto delle maiuscole/minuscole) e ne... commented 2025-06-19 09:52:28 UTC by gion274 ♦27 |
| 163820885 (Comments: 1) | Dwain Zwerg (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin, baust du die Buslinien in Horner Rennbahn auch wieder zurück? Den Ersatzverkehr hast du ja auch gelöscht. VG G4rden3r commented 2025-06-19 09:44:35 UTC by G4rden3r ♦25 |
| 167737489 (Comments: 3) | robbert-t (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb het nu als conditional tag toegevoegd, hopelijk houden de routers daar rekening mee. commented 2025-06-19 09:30:07 UTC by DwarfNebula_ ♦21 |
| 167815285 (Comments: 2) | ihareg (Discussed changesets: 13) | Have you checked this one in particular? commented 2025-06-19 09:27:58 UTC by yelisey90 ♦134 |
| 141386903 (Comments: 1) | Olaf der Mapper (Discussed changesets: 36) | die Postadresse von Unterstmatt ist 77815 Bühl commented 2025-06-19 09:10:19 UTC by townlion ♦250 |
| 160683127 (Comments: 2) | User5848 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Guido, I apologize for not responding earlier. I saw your message 6 months ago, but unfortunately I wasn’t able to check and fix the errors at that time due to personal reasons. I’m truly sorry for the delay and for the issues c... commented 2025-06-19 08:56:36 UTC by User5848 ♦11 |
| 167815018 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 373) | https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55415216 habe ich auch grad noch angepasst. commented 2025-06-19 08:53:31 UTC by habi ♦1,833 |
| 159571336 (Comments: 2) | User5848 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Landuse=grass olarak düzeltilmiştir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337702099 commented 2025-06-19 08:49:35 UTC by User5848 ♦11 |
| 163215828 (Comments: 2) | User5848 (Discussed changesets: 5) | In this change, I noticed that the Ankara node was missing from the map. Since another user had changed the Ankara city node to a fire station, I wanted to revert that change. However, because I did it manually instead of using the osm-revert tool, I... commented 2025-06-19 08:46:38 UTC by User5848 ♦11 |
| 167785530 (Comments: 1) | rbal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, something went wrong here. All of this data are duplicates of existing features. This happens if you load a geojson or similar file into JOSM and then try to upload it. You have to load data directly from the API or Overpass - every other w... commented 2025-06-19 08:45:42 UTC by mueschel ♦6,553 |
 | 164600523 (Comments: 2) | User5848 (Discussed changesets: 5) | The reason for this change was that I wanted to add the Turkish name "Lefkoşa" to the north side, since it is located on the north side of Northern Cyprus. Since Southern Cyprus is located on the south side, I wanted to add the Greek name ... commented 2025-06-19 08:40:16 UTC by User5848 ♦11 |
| 167812892 (Comments: 1) | Schulten Opleidingen & Certificeringen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Alleen een naam doet niet in OSM. Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen. Voorlopig office=educational_institution toegevoegd met website en phone. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-19 08:32:00 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 161990160 (Comments: 1) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:39 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 161989878 (Comments: 1) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:39 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 161990273 (Comments: 1) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:39 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 161990012 (Comments: 1) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:39 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 161990386 (Comments: 2) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:39 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 161989651 (Comments: 1) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:38 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 161989518 (Comments: 1) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:38 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 161989547 (Comments: 1) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:38 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 161989572 (Comments: 1) | avidmohajerani1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167813842 commented 2025-06-19 08:25:38 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 140179718 (Comments: 1) | staytuned (Discussed changesets: 54) | "please note that railway=razed is consumed by openrailwaymap and should thus not be deleted despite on-ground rule" that is incorrect tagging for renderer, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Incorrect_tagging_for_t... commented 2025-06-19 08:16:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167325218 (Comments: 2) | Aurimas Fišeras (Discussed changesets: 35) | Su pastato multipoligonu buvo kažkas negerai (kas tiksliai nepamenu). Klaidą rodė Osmose, todėl perdariau į paprastą building + ant viršaus uždėtus building:part. Reikšmių ranka nekoregavau, tiesiog copy/paste iš &... commented 2025-06-19 08:01:58 UTC by Aurimas Fišeras ♦47 |
| 167797917 (Comments: 7) | ImagiCart (Discussed changesets: 2) | Haha dankje. ;) commented 2025-06-19 07:58:26 UTC by ImagiCart ♦2 |
| 162574809 (Comments: 1) | davidbgr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Buenas, he visto (no solo en este changeset) que haces mucho abuso de highway=service, service=alley, en todo el norte palentino. Los callejones, sobre todo en zonas rurales, no son apenas comunes. Lo primero que has de mirar, dando igual si l... commented 2025-06-19 07:50:06 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦174 |
| 167799501 (Comments: 1) | donux-nl (Discussed changesets: 26) | Dag donux.. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me helemaal oke. MV G eggie commented 2025-06-19 07:28:12 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 147726592 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 383) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre alerte Cela a été corrigé dans nos outils Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-06-19 07:15:01 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦227 |
| 145567088 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 383) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre alerte, nous avons corrigé en effet ce problème Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-06-19 07:12:31 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦227 |
| 167742269 (Comments: 3) | ilx (Discussed changesets: 3) | PS zu: > jetzt bekomme ich hier meldungen das sich das routing ändert. Oder meinst du das Routing, was vorher tatsächlich durch die fehlende TR merkwürdig war war?: https://imgur.com/a/tJnWZFj https://www... commented 2025-06-19 07:09:34 UTC by ilx ♦3 |
| 167796956 (Comments: 1) | Taktaal (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi Taktaal.. Please comment your edits properly. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-06-19 07:09:28 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167790393 (Comments: 4) | Steedy42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alternatively add back just one staircase element naming it "access to Tiflis Boutique"; or editing Tiflis Boutique, adding entry details.) Ill leave final judgement up to you commented 2025-06-19 07:08:17 UTC by Steedy42 ♦1 |
| 167790984 (Comments: 1) | Pura Vida Bitcoin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Pura Vida Bitcoin, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https:/... commented 2025-06-19 07:03:45 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 161535556 (Comments: 1) | CouscousMerguez (Discussed changesets: 8) | Un bâtiment est démoli et je l'avais supprimé de la carte. Il a été rétabli (ID du chemin 1352689082) selon le cadastre dans ce groupe de modifications. Mais aujourd'hui, c'est toujours un c... commented 2025-06-19 07:03:33 UTC by Manuuu ♦2 |
| 167805490 (Comments: 1) | Gover Property Management (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Gover Property Management, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read:... commented 2025-06-19 07:03:05 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 41715672 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 383) | Bonjour, le node date d'il y'a plusieurs années et n'a pas été mis à jour depuis, et nous avons adapté depuis les bons formats Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-06-19 06:56:47 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦227 |
| 58233272 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 383) | Bonjour, le node date d'il y'a plusieurs années et n'a pas été mis à jour depuis, et nous avons adapté depuis les bons formats Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-06-19 06:56:38 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦227 |
| 166727770 (Comments: 1) | BoFaKon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo BoFaKon, Ist das richtig so? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19172345/history#map=19/47.722869/9.070342&layers=N https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=17/47.72300/9.07008/standard&lonlats=9.071274,47.72258;9.069633... commented 2025-06-19 06:55:36 UTC by Metzor ♦364 |
| 167810456 (Comments: 1) | s8evq (Discussed changesets: 53) | Adding hammock and benches, public_bookcase commented 2025-06-19 06:49:20 UTC by s8evq ♦186 |
| 167808922 (Comments: 1) | Taktaal (Discussed changesets: 31) | Could you have a look at this? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Your comments give no information about what you did. commented 2025-06-19 06:42:53 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦642 |
| 167740805 (Comments: 1) | dball37 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi dball, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for contributing, so far your edits are really good, but I do have a couple things I want to make sure I mention - Moving the building: If you switch through the different imagery layers, you'll ... commented 2025-06-19 06:13:28 UTC by AlexMQ ♦3 |
| 167807758 (Comments: 1) | NicFromNewy (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks! but these two restrictions from/to the same way aren't needed (if they were we'd need them on every single road at an intersection). https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19267503 https://www.openstreetmap.org/rela... commented 2025-06-19 06:08:00 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167702488 (Comments: 10) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 41) | Alternative: Diese detaillierten Infos nicht am Knoten der Tankstelle, sondern an dem der Pumpe einzutragen. Dann können auch die Standard-Tags "fee" und "charge" benutzt werden. Wurde an dieser OMV-Tankstelle auch schon so e... commented 2025-06-19 05:51:32 UTC by rene78 ♦443 |
| 167806420 (Comments: 1) | nniro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, when mapping a house, draw the outline accurately of the house itself instead of the block. Pressing Q will square the sides. commented 2025-06-19 05:49:58 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
 | 167775927 (Comments: 1) | Hamois (Discussed changesets: 1) | This hotel was already mapped, and you added it again at the wrong location. I deleted it and added the website to the other location node commented 2025-06-19 04:49:22 UTC by rhhs ♦115 |
| 167766770 (Comments: 2) | menganito (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi Edwin, Thanks for pointing this out. Makes sense, as bitcoin is not a form of payment but a currency. I will keep that in mind if I ever come across a bitcoin enabled shop again. It's also states here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2025-06-19 04:28:58 UTC by menganito ♦16 |
| 167805574 (Comments: 1) | Rachel2010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | > StreetComplete asked me which floor this shop was on, however coming back to it this info appears to be already tagged? I'm not familiar enough with indoor tags to know what's going on here. We have two tags for floor level, htt... commented 2025-06-19 04:00:49 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167715580 (Comments: 2) | SurveyGua (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sejujurnya kami tidak paham cara bekerja kolom editor pada openstreetmap ini. Jadi kemungkinan menghapus tersebut karena ketidaksengajaan. Mohon bantuan anda apabila anda bisa memperbaikinya dari sisi anda. Kami hanya berupaya menampilka... commented 2025-06-19 03:35:10 UTC by SurveyGua ♦1 |
| 167241990 (Comments: 1) | fropi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Why was the motorway tag removed? commented 2025-06-19 03:23:17 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,066 |
| 145588867 (Comments: 1) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Geometria z czapy. Brak przepustów. Sypie błędami przy weryfikacji. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167805399 commented 2025-06-19 02:48:46 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167786070 (Comments: 1) | pledge_concoct (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I'm pretty sure it's not only bad idea but also against the law to map this. Please remove asap! commented 2025-06-19 02:44:38 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 167805178 (Comments: 1) | chath_tsu (Discussed changesets: 5) | (per note 4799320) commented 2025-06-19 02:29:53 UTC by chath_tsu ♦2 |
| 152048220 (Comments: 3) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | W poprzednim wycofaniu ocalało skopane boisko (to że przecina się z budynkiem który olałeś jest małostkowe). Na twojej twórczości opanuje reverter do perfekcji. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167804906 commented 2025-06-19 02:06:59 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167781369 (Comments: 1) | allgear__noidea (Discussed changesets: 3) | can you provide any further information on why this is access=no? What kind of signage is present on the ground? commented 2025-06-19 02:05:54 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167804440 (Comments: 1) | shane1799 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 如同先前留言提醒，要寫上有意義的編輯摘要，敘述做出的變動，而非無意義的文字 FYR osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMC... commented 2025-06-19 02:05:36 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,418 |
| 167802050 (Comments: 2) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Although looking at this change are you sure it's correct? In general I think the preference is to have the network set at a lower level than simply "Transport for NSW". The regional trains are a different network to the metro t... commented 2025-06-19 02:02:55 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 134682345 (Comments: 1) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Błędny obszar zamieszkania, przecięcia z budynkami, podwórkami itp. Czyli byle udawało, że wygląda. Boisko typu nieokreślonego przecinające się z budynkiem. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167804595 commented 2025-06-19 01:50:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 152303346 (Comments: 1) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Błędny obszar zamieszkania, przecięcia z budynkami, podwórkami itp. Czyli byle udawało, że wygląda. Boisko typu nieokreślonego przecinające się z budynkiem. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167804595 commented 2025-06-19 01:50:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 153376738 (Comments: 1) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Błędny obszar zamieszkania, przecięcia z budynkami, podwórkami itp. Czyli byle udawało, że wygląda. Boisko typu nieokreślonego przecinające się z budynkiem. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167804595 commented 2025-06-19 01:50:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 140279212 (Comments: 1) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Błędny obszar zamieszkania, przecięcia z budynkami, podwórkami itp. Czyli byle udawało, że wygląda. Boisko typu nieokreślonego przecinające się z budynkiem. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167804595 commented 2025-06-19 01:50:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167804495 (Comments: 1) | Kevin Kofler (Discussed changesets: 13) | Address should be Währinger Straße 52. It is correct in the tags, just the commit message was wrong. commented 2025-06-19 01:44:25 UTC by Kevin Kofler ♦74 |
| 167784784 (Comments: 1) | JSR1781 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, the grass multipolygon has an inner touching the outer ring at the top right corner. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.73818&lat=-34.01152&zoom=19 commented 2025-06-19 01:32:09 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
| 167760803 (Comments: 3) | Bistromath (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yes. This is a highway on-ramp like on the other side of Autoroute Felix-Leclerc commented 2025-06-19 01:21:40 UTC by Bistromath ♦3 |
| 145619415 (Comments: 4) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Korekta komentarza. Byłeś informowany o błędzie cieku wodnego. Ciek wodny nie płynie pod górkę wzdłuż Krakowskiej w stronę Brzeska. Nie przecina się bezpośrednio z drogą bo tam jest przepust. Błędna geometria. Jeżel... commented 2025-06-19 01:17:33 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 154577807 (Comments: 2) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Ten człowiek edytuje bez czytania Wiki oraz ma w głębokim poważaniu wszelkie napomnienia. Informacje w poprzednich komentarzach do wielu zmian oraz w tej bezpośrednio. Bród nie jest brodem. Ciek wodny nie płynie pod górkę oraz ni... commented 2025-06-19 00:57:23 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 163974917 (Comments: 1) | ptrider (Discussed changesets: 4) | You forgot to add "natural=coastline," the island sunk. LOL. commented 2025-06-19 00:34:30 UTC by FajrAl ♦77 |
| 167773170 (Comments: 1) | terenprywatny (Discussed changesets: 1) | OSM służy do dodawania informacji które istnieją w rzeczywistości. Nie usuwa się dróg które istnieją realnie. W przypadku gdy droga przebiega przez teren prywatny, dodaje się tag access = private czyli dosłownie dostęp =... commented 2025-06-18 23:12:23 UTC by bartgron ♦133 |
| 167519976 (Comments: 1) | Achmad455 (Discussed changesets: 1) | sudah betul sebelumnya tag wikidata untuk Kecamatan Teluknaga, bukan Desa Babakan Asem. commented 2025-06-18 23:09:25 UTC by FajrAl ♦77 |
| 167591449 (Comments: 1) | Rif-Q (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hanya saran, untuk selanjutnya pemilihan citra satelit lebih baik gunakan Esri. commented 2025-06-18 22:55:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦77 |
| 167776679 (Comments: 1) | Indonesia@1997 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Halo, pastikan area yang kamu sunting dalam area lokal saja. Tiap ingin pindah tempat yang agak jauh, klik Save dahulu. commented 2025-06-18 22:33:55 UTC by FajrAl ♦77 |
| 167797479 (Comments: 1) | gmbo (Discussed changesets: 92) | Danke für den Hinweis, wird gleich korregiert. commented 2025-06-18 22:05:23 UTC by gmbo ♦44 |
| 167757051 (Comments: 1) | Relics (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The correct way to tag driveways is highway=service + service=driveway. driveway=residential is not documented. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway commented 2025-06-18 22:03:51 UTC by Mashin ♦555 |
| 167797279 (Comments: 4) | RuudN (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb de tagging aangepast zodat het niet van harte routeert voor iets op wielen. access=no verwijderd. informal=yes , path=desire toegevoegd. Dus een olifantenpaadje. Het pad door die tuin heb ik verwijderd. Daar is geen pad (meer) |
| 167710059 (Comments: 2) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ok, now I see there is a sign there that allows bikes. But I still think it's a bad idea on the part of the DOT or whoever is allowing bikes on the road when there is a cycle path to the side. commented 2025-06-18 21:29:55 UTC by Malcolm Maas ♦2 |
| 167711924 (Comments: 1) | RivalgoAV (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ciao Caro! Ho visto che hai modificato la linea "di demarcazione", ti voglio avvisare che quella linea si usa nei boschi (guarda wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline ), quindi ti prego di rimuovere il tag. grazie.... commented 2025-06-18 21:20:20 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
| 167799418 (Comments: 1) | Resist2020 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The red pins are NOT Monero excepted but "already implemented". Please read the orginal DFX post. https://x.com/DFX_swiss/status/1934891650414711181 Happy mapping, Edwin commented 2025-06-18 21:03:56 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 167795503 (Comments: 1) | Rowemu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Changeset area too big --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167795503 commented 2025-06-18 21:02:34 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦45 |
| 167797305 (Comments: 1) | RuudN (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je pad loopt dwars door een tuin. Ik zie op de luchtfoto geen pad overigens. access=no (verboden toegang en foot=yes kan weg. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-18 21:02:19 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167737838 (Comments: 1) | johnassel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, Das sind alles von highway=path bereits implizierte Tags. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167800101 commented 2025-06-18 21:01:35 UTC by Bienson ♦291 |
| 167777252 (Comments: 1) | jonnyx93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset area too big --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167777252 commented 2025-06-18 21:01:30 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦45 |
| 167563684 (Comments: 1) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 11) | Curious about your source for adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1394917098 ? commented 2025-06-18 20:49:57 UTC by Famlam ♦305 |
 | 137271588 (Comments: 1) | Mar Mar (Discussed changesets: 29) | That's some nice square wood commented 2025-06-18 20:46:03 UTC by stillhart ♦151 |
| 164340190 (Comments: 1) | Juan MAS (Discussed changesets: 14) | El Senado es un solo edificio. Para distinguir partes de edificio se utiliza "parte de edificio" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164340190 commented 2025-06-18 20:41:18 UTC by AlvaroRC ♦6 |
| 167478058 (Comments: 1) | Stavros2000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Καλησπέρα Σταύρο :) Είδα πως θες κάποιος να κοι... commented 2025-06-18 20:40:44 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦120 |
| 150039053 (Comments: 4) | RBB-RK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gerne, danke für die Rückmeldung! commented 2025-06-18 20:24:52 UTC by redd ♦383 |
| 167754309 (Comments: 1) | Студия музыки «Аплодисменты» (Discussed changesets: 1) | зачем вы тут все переломали? не надо править карту в нетрезвом виде. Откат всех правок commented 2025-06-18 20:20:07 UTC by literan ♦6,674 |
 | 167797970 (Comments: 1) | DaDapperMapper (Discussed changesets: 14) | Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-04-24 commented 2025-06-18 19:55:37 UTC by DaDapperMapper ♦14 |
| 148898348 (Comments: 3) | mol_an (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've extended the waterway in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167797936 and removed the `fixme:type=fix` commented 2025-06-18 19:52:49 UTC by habi ♦1,833 |
| 166135488 (Comments: 2) | fos design (Discussed changesets: 3) | Byłem w terenie. Zdecydowanie wyraźna na tyle by oznaczyć. commented 2025-06-18 19:47:56 UTC by fos design ♦2 |
| 167763810 (Comments: 4) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 258) | Naprawione ;) commented 2025-06-18 19:46:51 UTC by Szymson ♦363 |
| 167793619 (Comments: 1) | DieserLars (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo Lars, (check_date:shelter 2025-06-18). Die Buslinie gib es nicht mehr, oder ist die Haltestelle wieder aktiviert? vG pitfire commented 2025-06-18 19:45:43 UTC by pitfire ♦658 |
| 167786835 (Comments: 1) | Britzz (Discussed changesets: 49) | vous avez indiqué que la cloture du jardin Chérifa a une hauteur de 15 metres ! commented 2025-06-18 19:40:06 UTC by yxoc ♦47 |
| 167767253 (Comments: 5) | breugel01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep... gewoon doen.. hakuna matata commented 2025-06-18 19:24:15 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167712682 (Comments: 1) | Waldhüter (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hallo Waldhüter, ich habe bei einer Bearbeitung in Hilpoltstein gerade gesehen, dass du die "Gredl" augenscheinlich wieder komplett als railway=abandoned angelegt hast. Wenn ich es nicht völlig falsch verstanden habe, so... commented 2025-06-18 19:23:17 UTC by bigbug21 ♦147 |
| 167796761 (Comments: 1) | rybmat (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dzięki! :) commented 2025-06-18 19:21:29 UTC by YomanNH ♦303 |
| 142281639 (Comments: 3) | klnkengi (Discussed changesets: 34) | Guten Abend zusammen, Ich verfolge ja gelegentlich CS-Diskussionen per https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Germany#5/51.035/10.491 Da ich die Arbeit von @klnkengi sehr schätze habe ich mit das mal genauer angeschaut..... commented 2025-06-18 19:21:19 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,037 |
| 162305395 (Comments: 2) | Frankst (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gekümmert, scheint jetzt wieder offen zu sein :) commented 2025-06-18 19:21:15 UTC by Frankst ♦5 |
| 167612217 (Comments: 2) | YourLocalBrit (Discussed changesets: 1) | I had a look and have found some C roads (Class III) are unpaved maintained and a very small stretch of the A848 (Class I) in Salen is unpaved for about 100 metres before it's ending at the pier. This is the only B Road (Class III) that is u... commented 2025-06-18 19:19:02 UTC by YourLocalBrit ♦1 |
| 53433556 (Comments: 4) | breugel01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag breugel, Vooral in het begin is alles lastig.. zeker om zo'n editor onder de knie te krijgen. Probeer het eerst zelf.. Al doende leert men. Wanneer iets verkeerd gaat is dat geen ramp. Dan vinkje het hokje aan met review reque... commented 2025-06-18 19:17:44 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167779538 (Comments: 1) | aslibayrak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Açıklamaya "background girildi" yazmışsınız. İşaretlediğiniz alanda bir bina mı var, yoksa bina inşaatı mı? Uydu görüntüsünde bir şey görünmüyor. Bina inşaatı ise building=ye... commented 2025-06-18 18:59:10 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦49 |
| 167687236 (Comments: 1) | Teo Cata (Discussed changesets: 5) | Salut. De ce ai sters tag-ul de residential; de pe Chiajna? A disparut culoare gri a poligonului rezidential. commented 2025-06-18 18:58:12 UTC by rarad74 ♦272 |
| 167795724 (Comments: 1) | TheField (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-18 18:56:19 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167795563 (Comments: 1) | Lonneke Mank (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-18 18:55:12 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 163008826 (Comments: 2) | Mehmet Bey (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Woodpeck. Lojman in Turkish means “a house provided or given by an organization to its officials or workers for free or for a small rent.” “Kaymakamlık” is the administrative unit of a "ilçe"(ma... commented 2025-06-18 18:48:17 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦49 |
| 166421925 (Comments: 5) | gymate (Discussed changesets: 19) | Minden vasúti vágányt külön vonalként kell felvenni, igen. A közút esetében is fizikai elválasztás esetén szokás külön irányokat felvenni, pé... commented 2025-06-18 18:42:34 UTC by leveskockaa ♦61 |
| 167789699 (Comments: 2) | FallsChurch1914 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, I just realised it's your first entry: Welcome to OSM! commented 2025-06-18 18:41:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167791967 (Comments: 1) | Gerhard24 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hallo Gerhard24, cycleway=designated (also left und right) ist kein weit verbreiter Wert mit klarer Bedeutung. Gibt es hier einen bessere Wert mit dokumentierter Bedeutung der die situation vor Ort beschreibt? Auf Luftbildern sieht es nach cyc... commented 2025-06-18 18:10:57 UTC by FroschForscher ♦49 |
| 167788072 (Comments: 7) | Jakaka2222 (Discussed changesets: 7) | ... de gereedschapskisten... de presets downloaden van ontwikkelaars. Bv https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/josm-presets-voor-nl/72017 commented 2025-06-18 18:02:23 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 166986053 (Comments: 3) | oeoeoe (Discussed changesets: 7) | also, are you sure that cyclists are banned there? commented 2025-06-18 17:31:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167791826 (Comments: 1) | pepijngbr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Ons monument (gedenkplaats) is in het Engels een memorial. Ik heb het aangepast. area yes doet niets met histori... commented 2025-06-18 17:24:32 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 166627245 (Comments: 2) | handini (Discussed changesets: 1) | my apologies commented 2025-06-18 17:04:15 UTC by handini ♦1 |
| 167790380 (Comments: 5) | Salaheddinekclub (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yep, don't worry, what matters is what you see when you're editing. The rest will appear/disappear very soon, maximum a few hours. commented 2025-06-18 17:03:06 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
| 167741227 (Comments: 5) | Graf-Karto (Discussed changesets: 9) | Den Rettungspunkt habe ich auf dem Schirm, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4320102 commented 2025-06-18 16:59:53 UTC by berndw ♦580 |
| 167765754 (Comments: 1) | ompatekar (Discussed changesets: 13) | Which "source"? Since when are market roads residential? Show some quality. Stop senselessly reverting community edits. commented 2025-06-18 16:58:37 UTC by Vis_M ♦15 |
| 167788313 (Comments: 1) | Marc B V (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao Marc B V, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. Quindi hai 2 opzioni: ... commented 2025-06-18 16:48:00 UTC by demon_box ♦357 |
| 167790269 (Comments: 1) | JamJar II (Discussed changesets: 18) | Source was survey. commented 2025-06-18 16:28:59 UTC by JamJar II ♦12 |
| 167775382 (Comments: 1) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 193) | Szia! addr:subdistrict, addr:suburb: Miért, minek találsz ki újabb cím elemeket, ezeket valahol használják Budapesten? A valóságot térképezzük, nem az ide&aacut... commented 2025-06-18 16:28:35 UTC by infeeeee ♦513 |
| 158646418 (Comments: 2) | peanuthole (Discussed changesets: 1) | It was in fact for the bridge! Thank you for correcting it and bringing this to my attention so I don't make the same mistake again commented 2025-06-18 16:28:18 UTC by peanuthole ♦2 |
 | 167670123 (Comments: 4) | Hullysse (Discussed changesets: 1) | guyane.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/55-Wakapou.pdf commented 2025-06-18 16:24:18 UTC by Hullysse ♦1 |
| 167776806 (Comments: 1) | Salaheddinekclub (Discussed changesets: 3) | Si Salaheddine, as I said, I'm pretty sure that's a nightclub not a restaurant. commented 2025-06-18 16:21:24 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
| 167459930 (Comments: 1) | NorwayHouseMap (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi NorwayHouseMap, I had a question about the edits you made in this area. Is this the preferred naming schema for address information in this area? From what I understand the address information is its own tagging scheme. Looking forwa... commented 2025-06-18 16:12:31 UTC by AntSom ♦3 |
| 167746211 (Comments: 1) | Figandhoneycatering (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Are there any restaurant premises at this address? If not, I think it should be tagged as craft=caterer, not amenity=restaurant. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft=caterer Thanks. commented 2025-06-18 15:55:46 UTC by gmar5 ♦66 |
| 167785979 (Comments: 1) | Folenjeux (Discussed changesets: 1) | plus surface commerciale ne veut pas dite que le bâtiment est démolit ... Enlever ce qui n'est plus bon comme codage reste est toujours valable commented 2025-06-18 15:40:16 UTC by Jakka ♦1,812 |
| 167670108 (Comments: 4) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hola, respecto a la carretera no veo en esos enlaces referencia que me hagan pensar que esa carretera sea terciary, pero bueno, el tema carreteras no lo domino la verdad. En cuanto a la rambla, hace tiempo que no paso por esa rambla concretamente ... commented 2025-06-18 15:27:29 UTC by lololailo ♦69 |
| 166809403 (Comments: 11) | ssummoner1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Átírtam, vagyis vissza: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167787109#map=12/46.3283/20.2321 commented 2025-06-18 15:17:37 UTC by ssummoner1 ♦22 |
| 167777417 (Comments: 1) | Bombero31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por aportar información local, en el campo del nombre entiendo que no se está rellenando correctamente en la app? por ejemplo este "name"="Tapa Redonda Basura"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/... commented 2025-06-18 14:46:09 UTC by aTarom ♦765 |
| 167640116 (Comments: 7) | ArthµrC2016 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Je comfirme par exemple le panneau 14 n'est plus la j'irai vérifier commented 2025-06-18 14:31:12 UTC by ArthµrC2016 ♦7 |
| 167772697 (Comments: 2) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 258) | Za 3 miesiące commented 2025-06-18 14:24:20 UTC by Szymson ♦363 |
| 165497720 (Comments: 2) | hectodium (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi hectodium, I see you are using BING as background. Bing is outdated and is shifted from reality in many places. It is better to use the current PDOK. .. and even better the PDOK Quick Ortho 2025 (In editor Josm) that is the easiest. |
| 167782943 (Comments: 2) | Eegee0 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Prima, bedankt. commented 2025-06-18 14:15:00 UTC by Eegee0 ♦2 |
| 167679825 (Comments: 1) | manjurawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | You missed two lanes, the lane restrictions and the turn restrictions on the through;right lane. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167679825 commented 2025-06-18 13:59:11 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,097 |
| 167719878 (Comments: 3) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 121) | I clean also sixty six other buildings with the same tags :) commented 2025-06-18 13:56:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
 | 167744677 (Comments: 1) | ToebyBryant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice we use the key highway instead of road, Road, ROAD!! commented 2025-06-18 13:52:05 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167781348 (Comments: 1) | Dembel_rs (Discussed changesets: 1) | По гуглу рисовать нельзя commented 2025-06-18 13:51:33 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 167514032 (Comments: 2) | DungenessDesert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi AkuAnakTimur, Thank you for pointing that out. I have restored the connection to what it was before. Have a great day! commented 2025-06-18 13:50:49 UTC by DungenessDesert ♦1 |
 | 167746463 (Comments: 1) | dcskobuffs (Discussed changesets: 39) | Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-06-11. commented 2025-06-18 13:47:20 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦53 |
| 167782955 (Comments: 1) | ArthµrC2016 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bonjour, J'ai remarqué que vous avez supprimé plusieurs lampadaires qui sont toujours présents sur place, vous avez aussi modifié les refs de certains lampadires. Pourriez-vous expliquer vos modifications? <... commented 2025-06-18 13:45:23 UTC by HugoC01 ♦32 |
| 167740375 (Comments: 7) | Lenuji (Discussed changesets: 1) | Au plaisir! commented 2025-06-18 13:42:42 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦337 |
| 167735794 (Comments: 1) | KMetzner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo! Meinst Du eventuell Zahlungsweisen mit den folgenden Tags DKV = yes E100 = yes Eurowag = yes Romac Fuels = yes UTA = yes Verbio card = yes Benutze Werte kann man sich unter https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=payme... commented 2025-06-18 13:38:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167662448 (Comments: 1) | SkulkDev (Discussed changesets: 2) | Mostly good but turn lanes do count as lanes and a split should happen when the number of lanes changes. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167662448 ... commented 2025-06-18 13:31:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,097 |
| 167778285 (Comments: 1) | Gaurav Chaubey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Might want to update or remove source:maxspeed when you change maxspeed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167778285 commented 2025-06-18 13:17:11 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,097 |
| 167743129 (Comments: 1) | R102 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Cześć, skąd zmiana wysokości z 90m na 50m? Z moich informacji wynika, że wieża kościoła w najwyższym punkcie ma 90m. commented 2025-06-18 13:16:54 UTC by Michaall99 ♦48 |
| 146984447 (Comments: 5) | gebux (Discussed changesets: 47) | Mach was du willst. Ich bin nur von den Daten im BEV-Kataster ausgegangen. commented 2025-06-18 13:14:28 UTC by gebux ♦81 |
| 166819263 (Comments: 4) | Alex_Mapper (Discussed changesets: 6) | No próprio shopping :D Na entrada já tem o novo nome Tal como o resto do changeset, foi survey commented 2025-06-18 13:11:46 UTC by Alex_Mapper ♦24 |
| 167736926 (Comments: 2) | Trần Thanh Tuấn (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi there, Đà Lạt city has officially been dissolved per our administrative reforms. In fact, all district-level subdivisions are all gone too. So the Đà Lạt city node is gone as well. In Đà Lạt’s plac... commented 2025-06-18 13:10:57 UTC by Trần Thanh Tuấn ♦11 |
 | 167738397 (Comments: 1) | maclean nyasulu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please use lowercase! Have a look on https:/wiki.osm.org for a better description of a pitch commented 2025-06-18 13:10:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167780392 (Comments: 1) | tars4815 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-06-18 12:59:54 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,838 |
| 167773449 (Comments: 1) | shane1799 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 這並非一棟建築 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396177541 應該是好幾棟，旁邊你繪製的建築也是類似狀況 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167773449... commented 2025-06-18 12:58:01 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,418 |
| 167775320 (Comments: 1) | shane1799 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 你好 是否能使用更具描述性的文字來總結你的編輯摘要？ FYR https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... commented 2025-06-18 12:54:20 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,418 |
| 167777392 (Comments: 1) | shane1799 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 你好 是否能使用更具描述性的文字來總結你的編輯摘要？ FYR https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/cha... commented 2025-06-18 12:53:25 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,418 |
| 167756411 (Comments: 1) | Никита Билоус (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted - the paths exists and is walkable with an effort (although yes, it's quite overgrown) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167780384 commented 2025-06-18 12:33:01 UTC by yelisey90 ♦134 |
| 167777082 (Comments: 1) | j3ns (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag j3ns, Ik vermoed dat kerb in sommige routers strafpunten oplevert. Er rijdt toch niemand over dat eiland zelf heen. Eigenlijk zou de weg gesplitst moeten worden, maar er lopen daar 'tig' OV routes en dat maakt het gecompliceer... commented 2025-06-18 12:30:18 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167776995 (Comments: 1) | BoFaKon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Grüß dich, - Das Mapillary Bild passt hier nicht zur Lokation des Weges: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396191737 - Wieso wurde hier der Übergang entfernt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314810044 & https://www.opens... commented 2025-06-18 12:29:10 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,838 |
| 167730246 (Comments: 1) | Accrocamp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour ! Merci pour votre contribution, J'ai simplement mis à jour le champ opening hours avec les bons diminutif pour les noms de jours. En effet, ceux-ci doivent comporter uniquement deux lettres. Je vous laisse modifier sur ... commented 2025-06-18 12:28:21 UTC by Roue-doudou ♦47 |
| 167585426 (Comments: 1) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811471 ? commented 2025-06-18 12:23:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167584911 (Comments: 1) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811472 ? commented 2025-06-18 12:23:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167584741 (Comments: 1) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 19) | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811473 ? commented 2025-06-18 12:22:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 150709908 (Comments: 4) | BAK365 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Brücke scheint nicht so lang zu sein, dass die 2min extra brauchen ;) commented 2025-06-18 12:21:54 UTC by GartenStuhl ♦103 |
| 167779866 (Comments: 1) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 62) | Dyskusja: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog-w-woj-pomorskim/111839/221 commented 2025-06-18 12:21:50 UTC by czebureks ♦94 |
| 167612747 (Comments: 1) | bob3bob3 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811474 ? commented 2025-06-18 12:21:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167751566 (Comments: 1) | box_911 (Discussed changesets: 5) | can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811475 ? commented 2025-06-18 12:20:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167527182 (Comments: 2) | saman83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted in changeset 167696716 commented 2025-06-18 12:20:21 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
| 167668550 (Comments: 2) | saman83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted in changeset 167696739 commented 2025-06-18 12:19:51 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
| 167668578 (Comments: 2) | saman83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted in changeset 167696758 commented 2025-06-18 12:19:27 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
| 167668741 (Comments: 2) | saman83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted in changeset 167696273 commented 2025-06-18 12:18:59 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
| 167702272 (Comments: 1) | saman83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted in changeset 167704940 commented 2025-06-18 12:18:13 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
| 167702548 (Comments: 2) | saman83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted in changeset 167704987 commented 2025-06-18 12:17:28 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
| 167702962 (Comments: 1) | saman83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted in changeset 167705012 commented 2025-06-18 12:16:52 UTC by zstadler ♦1,055 |
| 167764462 (Comments: 2) | TheHolyCessna (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon commented 2025-06-18 11:51:38 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
| 167716846 (Comments: 1) | Mw96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the edit - for general reference, there is no need to specify oneway=no; that is the default assumption. commented 2025-06-18 11:31:36 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 167777512 (Comments: 1) | fghj753 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Difference from yesterday's osm.org/changeset/167754914 is that this time i included nodes that were not part of any crossing-way. Overpass query: [out:json][timeout:25]; {{geocodeArea:Helsinki}}->.searchArea; // Step 1: Get all ... commented 2025-06-18 11:21:40 UTC by fghj753 ♦49 |
| 167771861 (Comments: 2) | stadt-koeln-umac (Discussed changesets: 11) | Gerne etwas anderes eintragen. Wichtig ist nur, dass es nicht im Stadtplan als Weg erscheint! Danke! commented 2025-06-18 11:14:34 UTC by stadt-koeln-umac ♦6 |
| 167772021 (Comments: 2) | stadt-koeln-umac (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo Zrop, das ist bereits geändert, aber wohl noch nicht aktualisiert! Gruß commented 2025-06-18 11:10:51 UTC by stadt-koeln-umac ♦6 |
| 167772552 (Comments: 1) | stadt-koeln-umac (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo stadt-koeln-umac, bei dieser Fläche handelt es sich auch nicht um eine Verkehrsberuhigte Straße "highway=living_street". Gruß Zrop commented 2025-06-18 11:06:13 UTC by Zrop ♦71 |
| 167772113 (Comments: 1) | stadt-koeln-umac (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo stadt-koeln-umac, auch bei dieser Fläche handelt es sich nicht um eine Verkehrsberuhigte Straße "highway=living_street" sondern um einen Gehweg. Gruß Zrop commented 2025-06-18 11:05:32 UTC by Zrop ♦71 |
| 167774532 (Comments: 1) | Goof1994 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Goof, Hier heb ik het pad losgemaakt van de landuse. Je edits .. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167774532 MVG eggie commented 2025-06-18 10:51:31 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 165055575 (Comments: 2) | BaboucheVerte (Discussed changesets: 18) | Salut, en effet ... merci de ta vigilance ! commented 2025-06-18 10:49:45 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦34 |
| 167774263 (Comments: 1) | Goof1994 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-18 10:47:49 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 65995099 (Comments: 1) | Marco_Fix (Discussed changesets: 12) | way 660219472 la strada si chiama Frazione Banna, ma penso che non abbia nome. Quello è solo il nome della frazione e non della strada afferente. commented 2025-06-18 10:32:49 UTC by canfe ♦1,116 |
| 167532179 (Comments: 2) | Stahlmann (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Flo, bitte analog auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167442960 für die auseinandergehende Definition im Wiki beachten. In diesem spezifischen Fall könnte noch über die frei stehenden Gebäude, die jedoch ... commented 2025-06-18 10:25:40 UTC by Stahlmann ♦40 |
| 167442960 (Comments: 2) | Stahlmann (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die Seite selbst (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential%3Drural), beschreibt :rural als "residential=rural is a subtag of landuse=residential and is used to specify residential areas with low-rise residential buildings (buil... commented 2025-06-18 10:19:50 UTC by Stahlmann ♦40 |
| 167091093 (Comments: 1) | Cageythree (Discussed changesets: 6) | Die Benennung der Straßen entspricht nicht der offiziellen Benennung. Die alte B241 (Ortsdurchfahrten) heißt voraussichtlich bis Ende 25 noch B241, bevor sie dann in eine Kreisstraße umbenannt wird. Die neue B241 (Orts... commented 2025-06-18 10:14:49 UTC by raffie78 ♦6 |
| 167134225 (Comments: 1) | PKautz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Die Benennung der Straßen entspricht nicht der offiziellen Benennung. Die alte B241 (Ortsdurchfahrten) heißt voraussichtlich bis Ende 25 noch B241, bevor sie dann in eine Kreisstraße umbenannt wird. Die neue B241 (Orts... commented 2025-06-18 10:14:06 UTC by raffie78 ♦6 |
| 167162757 (Comments: 1) | PKautz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Die Benennung der Straßen entspricht nicht der offiziellen Benennung. Die alte B241 (Ortsdurchfahrten) heißt voraussichtlich bis Ende 25 noch B241, bevor sie dann in eine Kreisstraße umbenannt wird. Die neue B241 (Orts... commented 2025-06-18 10:13:47 UTC by raffie78 ♦6 |
| 159995133 (Comments: 1) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 25) | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811306 ? commented 2025-06-18 10:09:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167696282 (Comments: 3) | Edward Lundin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah, ok. I will check other sources and possibly redo the change. Thanks. commented 2025-06-18 09:59:44 UTC by Edward Lundin ♦1 |
| 163021673 (Comments: 4) | Negjana (Discussed changesets: 67) | ETCS is in operation for testing purposes but not yet for general use, that will happen in August, also ETCS on Südbahn will go into operation from Frohnleiten to Spielfeld-Straß. For me it is logical to keep it as under construction until... commented 2025-06-18 09:54:42 UTC by Negjana ♦28 |
| 136116763 (Comments: 2) | zorae (Discussed changesets: 50) | Ein paar der Pflanzkübel wurden für Bauarbeiten entfernt: Diese habe ich jetzt aus OSM gelöscht. Die Übrigen sollten noch größtenteils richtig sein. commented 2025-06-18 09:52:49 UTC by zorae ♦23 |
| 163451101 (Comments: 4) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 34) | Grazie commented 2025-06-18 09:52:34 UTC by f_gonella ♦23 |
| 98228358 (Comments: 1) | Simon Vuillemin (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour Simon, Tu avais ajouté des pistes cyclables de part et d'autre de l'Avenue Henri Brisson (https://www.osm.org/way/27866653). Elles vont du pont jusqu'à la Place Gabriel Péri. Comme je ne voyais pa... commented 2025-06-18 09:52:12 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,135 |
| 162777345 (Comments: 3) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 34) | Grazie commented 2025-06-18 09:52:11 UTC by f_gonella ♦23 |
| 167759894 (Comments: 1) | MorahT (Discussed changesets: 5) | thanks! commented 2025-06-18 09:52:09 UTC by RedAuburn ♦219 |
| 157560465 (Comments: 1) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi wildmaps, please check your imports better. By example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321717952 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321717929 (see also https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.40911&... commented 2025-06-18 09:50:30 UTC by pyram ♦501 |
| 136966866 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 34) | Thanks, learned from my mistake! commented 2025-06-18 09:50:13 UTC by f_gonella ♦23 |
| 97707638 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 34) | Corretto a suo tempo, grazie per la segnalazione commented 2025-06-18 09:47:34 UTC by f_gonella ♦23 |
| 115015008 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 34) | Corretto a suo tempo, grazie per la segnalazione commented 2025-06-18 09:47:21 UTC by f_gonella ♦23 |
| 167766746 (Comments: 2) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 16) | + jeszcze poprawka mojego błędnego tagowania tutaj: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167773732 commented 2025-06-18 09:45:34 UTC by Marek-M ♦898 |
| 167725897 (Comments: 2) | gianni55 (Discussed changesets: 7) | I percorsi che io faccio in Ebike e che poi mappo nelle parti mancanti sono tranquilli senza alcun problema nel percorrerli e i corsi d'acqua di cui parli sono spessi asciutti o con piccoli rivoli d'acqua facilmente oltresassabili con la Eb... commented 2025-06-18 09:38:59 UTC by gianni55 ♦1 |
| 167767465 (Comments: 1) | barkleesanders (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier. commented 2025-06-18 09:38:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 156926525 (Comments: 1) | 7daz7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao! Hai controllato se i ristoranti (e i bagni) esistono realmente? nelle immagini aeree più recenti non ci sono, solo su Esri ci sono. Grazie commented 2025-06-18 09:29:19 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦39 |
 | 167739384 (Comments: 1) | Saeedj30 (Discussed changesets: 1) | سلام چرا یک تلفن را وسط خانه های مسکونی قرار دادی؟ لطفا قبل از مشارکت راهنمای کامل را مطالعه کنید. commented 2025-06-18 09:19:13 UTC by NotAvailable ♦12 |
| 167686624 (Comments: 2) | Leo Slager (Discussed changesets: 158) | Hoi Gert-Jan, Allereerst nemen we je dat helemaal niet kwalijk. Het overkomt zelfs ervaren mappers. En ik repareer ze graag :-) Intussen had ik uitgezocht hoe de routes terug naar de A4 lopen, dus ik ga nu alle Flixbussen weer aanpassen. ... commented 2025-06-18 09:11:46 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,187 |
| 167582046 (Comments: 2) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 14) | Und wozu denkst Du sind diese Verbindungstunnel installiert worden? Selbstverständlich ist die Notfallsituation nicht ausgewiesen, da die Nutzung ausschließlich über Notfallpläne der Rettungskräfte erfolgt. Im Gegensatz zu... commented 2025-06-18 09:03:35 UTC by LaLinea ♦5 |
| 167763495 (Comments: 3) | CreCrePL (Discussed changesets: 58) | Right, typo finally corrected. Thanks commented 2025-06-18 09:03:10 UTC by CreCrePL ♦29 |
| 167744742 (Comments: 3) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 15) | Tagged as selling maps in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167771810, thanks commented 2025-06-18 09:01:40 UTC by gurglypipe ♦862 |
| 166920019 (Comments: 3) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia! Köszönöm az észrevételt és hogy jelezted a problémát, és hogy javítottad a dolgot. A lev listán tegnap menő beszélgetésre reagálva hamarosan ki... commented 2025-06-18 08:16:56 UTC by Fiorentina ♦2 |
| 167665594 (Comments: 2) | Obanazawa Kuri (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dear rene78, The pedestrian ways there are not fairly precise, so I deleted them and planned to draw them again later. Thanks for your notice. Obanazawa Kuri commented 2025-06-18 08:13:46 UTC by Obanazawa Kuri ♦2 |
| 167011743 (Comments: 1) | Cricri93160 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, N'hésitez pas à clôturer les notes une fois que vous les avez traité commented 2025-06-18 08:13:15 UTC by atchisson ♦8 |
| 167568292 (Comments: 1) | onkelfelix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo onkelfelix, ich habe gesehen, dass Du in der Gegend ein paar Änderungen an Wegen gemacht hast. Ein paar Sachen sind mir aufgefallen und da du anscheinend noch recht frisch bei OpenStreetMaps bist, wollte ich Dir noch ein paar Tipps d... commented 2025-06-18 08:08:04 UTC by disc24 ♦25 |
| 167725770 (Comments: 1) | robbre (Discussed changesets: 19) | Dag robbre, Dat was een heel puzzeltje. Wanneer je polygonen onderbreekt maakt editor iD er multpolygonen van. Die heb ik verwijderd en de plugonen weer gesloten. Van dat enorme grasvlak heb ik een leisure=sports_centre gemaakt. Er ligt... commented 2025-06-18 08:06:36 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 120901827 (Comments: 3) | Stalker61 (Discussed changesets: 95) | Ок, я ошибся в авторстве. Насчет "глупо" или нет, держите свои мысли при себе. commented 2025-06-18 07:58:35 UTC by Takuto ♦49 |
| 167759908 (Comments: 1) | Paul Martin Suckow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution. Please don't add any abbrevation specially on street names. commented 2025-06-18 07:51:06 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167519010 (Comments: 2) | mona_magdy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, Siarhei Salauyou; I wanted to thank you for your contribution to improving the quality of road maps for the United Arab Emirates in OSM, and to inform you that I work within a team that updates and improves the quality of road maps on OSM b... commented 2025-06-18 07:50:48 UTC by mona_magdy ♦11 |
| 118273787 (Comments: 1) | 阿越視聽室 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 類別挑選錯誤，應該選擇幼兒園amenity=kindergarten 另外依據Overture資料加上後甲幼兒園名稱 commented 2025-06-18 07:34:11 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,418 |
| 155608759 (Comments: 3) | Monolo23 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Muchas gracias por la rapidez, al ver el survey con conocimiento local siempre extremo las precauciones de no estropear nada, un placer trabajar así commented 2025-06-18 07:26:13 UTC by aTarom ♦765 |
| 167761070 (Comments: 1) | CrumbedTommyRuff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, is the dog park going to be rebuilt with the same name? If so, a lifecycle prefix might be best, maybe construction:leisure=dog_park https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix --- ... commented 2025-06-18 07:22:43 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167760046 (Comments: 1) | Ruangsak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Ruangsak, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.bt... commented 2025-06-18 07:15:00 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 167761743 (Comments: 1) | bbutter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the contribution! In addition to a name, POIs should also have tags that describe what they represent. For example, a restaurant would have its name tagged, but also a tag indicating that it is a restaurant-- otherwise data consu... commented 2025-06-18 07:14:02 UTC by pwbriggs ♦34 |
| 167690497 (Comments: 3) | Jonas9876 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mit dem Rennrad würde ich aber auch sowohl gravel als auch compacted meiden. Der Unterschied ist in der Praxis minimal. Fahre aber schon seit 2010 fast nur noch Trekkingrad. commented 2025-06-18 07:12:32 UTC by GerdP ♦2,751 |
| 167701527 (Comments: 1) | Giuseppe Masilli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao. Trovo curioso il passaggio di un percorso escursionistico all'interno di una tubazione interrata! Forse dovresti disegnare una way (sentiero?) che passa sul terreno sotto cui passa la tubazione? Ivo commented 2025-06-18 07:04:32 UTC by Jrachi ♦761 |
 | 167767252 (Comments: 1) | Micheal Kal (Discussed changesets: 22) | forgot to add #osmuganda commented 2025-06-18 07:00:50 UTC by Micheal Kal ♦8 |
| 167668811 (Comments: 2) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 166) | Я был 15-го вечером: все съезды работали. commented 2025-06-18 06:55:38 UTC by neo-plan ♦97 |
| 167708814 (Comments: 1) | Seniorgeorg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zu private Detail. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167766958 commented 2025-06-18 06:50:26 UTC by Peer van Daalen ♦63 |
| 167730674 (Comments: 9) | knoefix (Discussed changesets: 7) | hab mich nur über die Zeichennummer gewundert. Ansonsten kenne ich hambüten nur Oberflächlich commented 2025-06-18 06:45:05 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,299 |
| 167708705 (Comments: 2) | Seniorgeorg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zu private Detail. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167766763 commented 2025-06-18 06:44:17 UTC by Peer van Daalen ♦63 |
| 167766475 (Comments: 1) | Micheal Kal (Discussed changesets: 22) | forgot to add #osmuganda commented 2025-06-18 06:39:39 UTC by Micheal Kal ♦8 |
| 167680829 (Comments: 3) | Jonas9876 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Alles gut, danke fürs genaue Prüfen. Es war das Problem, dass auf outdooractive der weg als Schotter deklariert war (und damit nicht als Rennrad route nutzbar war) und ich mir sicher war, dass das nicht der Fall ist. Aber Pflaster ist eigen... commented 2025-06-18 06:30:00 UTC by Jonas9876 ♦2 |
 | 167072452 (Comments: 2) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18355 commented 2025-06-18 06:02:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167757349 (Comments: 2) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 101) | Genau, danke für den Hinweis, wird heute bereinigt. VG commented 2025-06-18 06:02:10 UTC by chris66 ♦359 |
| 167730581 (Comments: 2) | AJlekceu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Понял, спасибо. commented 2025-06-18 05:48:41 UTC by AJlekceu ♦1 |
| 167072193 (Comments: 2) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166949997 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166950055 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166885668 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166885702 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166885648 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166949507 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166949965 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166885621 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166885565 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166885599 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166885132 (Comments: 2) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166884884 (Comments: 2) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166885503 (Comments: 1) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166884741 (Comments: 2) | Shawnster (Discussed changesets: 19) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 commented 2025-06-18 05:47:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167738791 (Comments: 1) | guguli00000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't add such info to the map. I reverted it commented 2025-06-18 05:36:23 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦107 |
| 167753093 (Comments: 1) | RFuser11 (Discussed changesets: 53) | Привет. Ты дорисовал полигон attraction=big_wheel вокруг точки attraction=big_wheel. Получилось, что в этом месте два колеса обозрения. Надо бы оставить что-... commented 2025-06-18 05:25:10 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦107 |
| 167726515 (Comments: 1) | Smallville_l (Discussed changesets: 2) | 你好，openstreetmap并非一个可以任意胡乱绘制地图的网站，你应当注意到你加的标签已经有了，请勿重复添加 commented 2025-06-18 05:22:45 UTC by Taksine ♦103 |
| 167686106 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 102) | I'm not sure it's best to cut out the atrium like this as a building inner. It's tricky because it is open air on the NE end, but completely covered by a clear roof and still contains escalators and ground, level 1, level 2 walkways ar... commented 2025-06-18 05:10:42 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167721485 (Comments: 3) | osm_poi_matchmaker (Discussed changesets: 33) | Köszönöm, de igen, kézzel vettem ki az újakat eltérőeket. Az AVIA számára visszajeleztem, hogy pár elem nem stimmel. A többi kút megvolt, nem volt nagy változás a bej... commented 2025-06-18 05:04:46 UTC by osm_poi_matchmaker ♦26 |
| 167719880 (Comments: 4) | osm_poi_matchmaker (Discussed changesets: 33) | Köszönöm szépen a visszajelzéseiteket, régi adatforrást használtam, van egy új URL, ahonnan elérhetőek a friss adatok, Máté már dolgozik rajta, én is most pr... commented 2025-06-18 05:03:12 UTC by osm_poi_matchmaker ♦26 |
| 167739852 (Comments: 1) | adam999 (Discussed changesets: 4) | To może trzeba skasować plac budowy? commented 2025-06-18 04:50:20 UTC by VA00 ♦580 |
| 165396769 (Comments: 1) | X86353 (Discussed changesets: 1) | overwritten with decade old information https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167764017 commented 2025-06-18 04:49:13 UTC by MetalCascade ♦12 |
| 167721813 (Comments: 1) | HOM420 (Discussed changesets: 3) | RE: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167721813 The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect (partially overlap) each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of t... commented 2025-06-18 04:41:43 UTC by b-jazz ♦636 |
| 166515815 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi Sylabowy Kot, thank you for getting in touch via commenting on the changeset since I am, along with other members of the TomTom mapping team, directly notified that way. Cross-checking your notes with TomTom proprietary data sources, I cannot... commented 2025-06-18 04:10:09 UTC by Ky_AT ♦14 |
| 167715873 (Comments: 1) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 13) | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route_master the route_master relation should have the route relations as members not the first bus stop. The network should probably match the network of the routes commented 2025-06-18 03:22:37 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167760605 (Comments: 1) | Browntown1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. This looks good to me, but is the street name "Lago Vista" (no suffix) or "Lago Vista Boulevard"? commented 2025-06-18 02:30:08 UTC by citrula ♦835 |
| 167760686 (Comments: 1) | BigLeo9101 (Discussed changesets: 2) | you added `not:operator:wikidata=Q8039932` to the building - this is probably because you rejected the suggested name and added the expanded version commented 2025-06-18 02:21:10 UTC by citrula ♦835 |
| 167761342 (Comments: 1) | RSydes (Discussed changesets: 13) | The new map: https://usfs-public.app.box.com/s/dvcovha6njpqq7ra2guhs0gkqzs60s2p commented 2025-06-18 02:03:30 UTC by RSydes ♦17 |
| 167696342 (Comments: 1) | Doraaaaa:) (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - apparent vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167761271 commented 2025-06-18 01:50:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167696072 (Comments: 1) | Doraaaaa:) (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - apparent vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167761271 commented 2025-06-18 01:50:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167697859 (Comments: 2) | Doraaaaa:) (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - apparent vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167761271 commented 2025-06-18 01:50:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167696736 (Comments: 1) | Doraaaaa:) (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - apparent vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167761271 commented 2025-06-18 01:50:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167696937 (Comments: 1) | Doraaaaa:) (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - apparent vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167761271 commented 2025-06-18 01:50:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167712924 (Comments: 2) | toreporti (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167761167 commented 2025-06-18 01:42:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166797381 (Comments: 1) | toreporti (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167761167 commented 2025-06-18 01:42:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167105984 (Comments: 1) | toreporti (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167761167 commented 2025-06-18 01:42:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167138205 (Comments: 1) | Fugly16 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Got a source for these? commented 2025-06-18 01:41:35 UTC by jleedev ♦298 |
| 167718089 (Comments: 2) | yazanarouri (Discussed changesets: 3) | 4212 is significantly closer to Brisbane, this definitely seems incorrect. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167718089 commented 2025-06-18 01:19:23 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167720870 (Comments: 2) | yazanarouri (Discussed changesets: 3) | Does North Toowoomba East actually exist? I can find North Toowoomba and East Toowoomba, but nothing combining the two of them. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167720870 ... commented 2025-06-18 01:17:22 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 153237622 (Comments: 1) | Нечтобытотакнет (Discussed changesets: 9) | Что это? commented 2025-06-18 01:05:49 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 138953592 (Comments: 2) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 38) | It is not. Fixed. Thanks for catching; not sure how this slipped past me! commented 2025-06-18 01:05:47 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦92 |
| 153237419 (Comments: 1) | Нечтобытотакнет (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167760655 commented 2025-06-18 01:03:41 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 153237431 (Comments: 1) | Нечтобытотакнет (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167760655 commented 2025-06-18 01:03:41 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 153237383 (Comments: 1) | Нечтобытотакнет (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167760655 commented 2025-06-18 01:03:40 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 167700636 (Comments: 1) | Sauvik Das (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi what's your reason for adding these addr:postcode and addr:country nodes around the place? There are a bit meaningless without any other address information and can be derived from existing boundaries. commented 2025-06-18 00:45:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,680 |
| 167523379 (Comments: 2) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi vmeurisse, Thank you for reaching out, sharing the image, and reverting the changeset. Upon further review, I have realized that the section is captured quite recently in Panoramax. I will make sure to check other available imagery sources in my e... commented 2025-06-18 00:34:12 UTC by Kaduna ♦19 |
| 166396107 (Comments: 6) | Vodevil_Mark (Discussed changesets: 3) | It doesn't matter whether there will be a toll=yes tag there, since it is impossible to either exit or enter the road on Byczyna. However, if you consider it necessary, you can return the tag. As for the toll=no tag, in fact, this is unnecessary... commented 2025-06-17 23:59:13 UTC by Vodevil_Mark ♦3 |
| 139364694 (Comments: 2) | CjMalone (Discussed changesets: 108) | Another? This changeset was so long ago, but it doesn't look like I added any bus stops in it, just added the refs. I don't know of NaPTAN including planned bus stops, but it does include stops without active routes, and it in... commented 2025-06-17 23:54:52 UTC by CjMalone ♦233 |
| 167755281 (Comments: 2) | Tashani Williams (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, if you're working with Ellie Moon on these and you're pulling from Google Maps, please stop for a minute. We can't copy data from Google Maps. commented 2025-06-17 23:41:30 UTC by iandees ♦723 |
 | 129375835 (Comments: 1) | IngridFotso (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Ingrid, what's the meaning of denotation=talus? thanks commented 2025-06-17 23:38:16 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,689 |
| 167638362 (Comments: 3) | Nikos Kapelonis1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Καλως ήρθες Νίκο :) Να είσαι καλά που θες να βελ&t... commented 2025-06-17 23:26:41 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦120 |
| 137801038 (Comments: 1) | roippo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Roberto, come mai a questo albero hai impostato altezza=0? commented 2025-06-17 23:22:52 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,689 |
| 167694341 (Comments: 1) | zuzak (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks, this looks good to me. I added a tide_guage to this as well as this part of the Clyde is tidal. Otherwise the tagging looks good to me. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:monitoring:tide_gauge. Cheers Chris commented 2025-06-17 23:09:27 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 167426878 (Comments: 1) | NickOrion21 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167759071 commented 2025-06-17 22:59:36 UTC by dadavid ♦410 |
| 167426825 (Comments: 1) | NickOrion21 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167759071 commented 2025-06-17 22:59:35 UTC by dadavid ♦410 |
| 167759001 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The user who marked them as private has been marking privately owned roads as access=private, though often these roads are legally open to the public. They have ignored my comment and comments by 2 others informing them of this. This isn't al... commented 2025-06-17 22:56:57 UTC by jm428 ♦15 |
| 167669232 (Comments: 1) | Linfietst (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for adding the track. Edit looks great, I added some access tags to the tree trunck. The only other thing that I can see is that it would be good to know how the track crosses the stream and mark this properly. But... commented 2025-06-17 22:52:42 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦369 |
| 167103051 (Comments: 1) | Jay May (Discussed changesets: 159) | Hello Jay May, can you share the precise reasoning how a simple hamlet named "СТ Урожай" accrued the tags: int_name=Egin Jïnaw int_name:prefix=bağbandıq qoğamı name=Егін Жинау name:kk=Егін Жи... commented 2025-06-17 22:51:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,413 |
 | 167587797 (Comments: 1) | MohamadAli Halwani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi MohamadAli Halwani, welcome to osm :) i think the english name you added to addr:housenumber should probably be moved to the name:en tag. See the wiki [1] for details. greetings David [1] https://wiki.openstr... commented 2025-06-17 22:49:21 UTC by dadavid ♦410 |
| 167640931 (Comments: 1) | adprmdi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to osm :) unfortunately, i reverted this edit as it isnt really a valid element (just a node with a generic name). if you want to continue working on osm, the wiki [1] is a good starting point :) I hope you hav... commented 2025-06-17 22:44:35 UTC by dadavid ♦410 |
| 167406214 (Comments: 2) | donovaly (Discussed changesets: 34) | When I remember correctly iD told me that I should add "network:wikidata" as well as "train=yes". I read here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:train "This tag is mainly used for trains which are not a tram=*,... commented 2025-06-17 21:54:46 UTC by donovaly ♦37 |
| 167728895 (Comments: 3) | Adim169 (Discussed changesets: 6) | dalla wiki mi risulta che possa essere usato anche sulle aree, in ogni caso quale sarebbe l'alternativa corretta? commented 2025-06-17 21:50:03 UTC by George Sears ♦63 |
| 167756339 (Comments: 1) | Salaheddinekclub (Discussed changesets: 3) | This seems more like a nightclub than a restaurant. commented 2025-06-17 21:49:14 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
| 167736701 (Comments: 1) | Kaleka6996 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Skoro nic się nie zmieniło, po co to przejście dla pieszych na płocie? Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167757662 commented 2025-06-17 21:45:15 UTC by bartgron ♦133 |
| 158813213 (Comments: 1) | arakeen (Discussed changesets: 2) | I changed name=The Vicarage to addr:housename=The Vicarage, now it renders correctly with the housename and housenumber both showing commented 2025-06-17 21:44:04 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦67 |
| 160595865 (Comments: 1) | arakeen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just a note - if a long footpath has multiple surfaces you should split the way, I corrected a footpath here that was tagged with surface=asphalt when in fact the entire length from Pie Gardens to Delmer End Lane was mostly dirt and grass. commented 2025-06-17 21:43:48 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦67 |
| 167749632 (Comments: 1) | enable_15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey enable_15, This is an object which was surveyed (not added from aerial imagery) by a user who likes to add additional detail. This might be correct (solely inaccurate) data, though it is not always flawless (first part can be checked by lo... commented 2025-06-17 21:43:29 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦672 |
| 167503922 (Comments: 2) | user_5589 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Le problème ? Platanus n'est pas une espèce. C'est un genre. Le genre est le niveau supérieur à l'espèce. Il existe de nombreuses espèces chez Platanus. Par exemple, Platanus orientalis et Plat... commented 2025-06-17 21:36:43 UTC by user_5589 ♦50 |
| 153666363 (Comments: 6) | Broken Butler (Discussed changesets: 3) | And to be honest I did not think either my edits or the state before then were still relevant at this point, since it's been a year and I kinda expected things to have changed anyway by now so should just be edited/improved by local people on th... commented 2025-06-17 21:30:41 UTC by Broken Butler ♦3 |
| 167070746 (Comments: 12) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 28) | Okay, thanks! commented 2025-06-17 21:29:48 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦33 |
| 167691594 (Comments: 2) | Vas111 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi, not sure. I will merge it back commented 2025-06-17 21:22:35 UTC by Vas111 ♦84 |
| 167630769 (Comments: 1) | SkulkDev (Discussed changesets: 2) | Mostly good but really should be split where the number of lanes does. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167630769 commented 2025-06-17 21:11:31 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,097 |
| 167665481 (Comments: 2) | Adim169 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ho provveduto a rimuovere l'indirizzo dal multipolygon io stesso. commented 2025-06-17 21:06:09 UTC by George Sears ♦63 |
| 167178619 (Comments: 2) | Morich Wuffert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und danke für deinen netten Kommentar zu meinem ersten Edit. :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167178619 commented 2025-06-17 20:58:19 UTC by Morich Wuffert ♦1 |
| 164906440 (Comments: 10) | ViewStreet (Discussed changesets: 5) | It would be great to know where the documentation is for the rule. Thanks. commented 2025-06-17 20:55:40 UTC by ika-chan! ♦242 |
| 167524382 (Comments: 4) | WanakaLake (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, Thank you for clarifying further towards the specifics in the tagging combinations for “building = roof “ features that include “ layer = 1 “. Reading further, it seems that this would be the accurate tagging th... commented 2025-06-17 20:46:28 UTC by WanakaLake ♦4 |
| 167552425 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 178) | Same here haha. It might've just been a relic of expressway-based trunk tagging. commented 2025-06-17 20:44:51 UTC by Joseph R P ♦332 |
| 167754914 (Comments: 1) | fghj753 (Discussed changesets: 35) | For future reference, here’s the Overpass QL I used to select those kerb=* nodes. First, it limits to nodes tagged only with kerb=* (so we don’t touch kerb tags used alongside bus stops or platforms) - this follows the advice in wiki (htt... commented 2025-06-17 20:38:14 UTC by fghj753 ♦49 |
| 167670019 (Comments: 4) | Krezut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bardzo prosze, zapomianłem jeszcze o fryzjerze: Studio Fryzjerskie "Angel" Dagmara Pałka commented 2025-06-17 20:27:07 UTC by Krezut ♦1 |
| 167697814 (Comments: 1) | MerijntjeB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag Merijntje.. Top.. Wanneer het echt een trap is gebruiken we highway=steps. en dan incline =up of down. Ik zie overigens geen trap op de luchtfoto. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-17 20:15:56 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167712097 (Comments: 1) | merlot09 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe grundsätzlich zum Erfassten keine Anmerkungen, nur eine kleine Prüfbitte: Auf Bahnsteigen sind Überflurhydranten eher selten, häufiger sind fire_... commented 2025-06-17 19:55:36 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
| 167629188 (Comments: 2) | SzybkieDrogi (Discussed changesets: 53) | Widzę, że ignorujesz komentarze, więc sam poprawiłem błędy, które zrobiłeś. commented 2025-06-17 19:48:59 UTC by YomanNH ♦303 |
| 167676058 (Comments: 7) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 166) | если прям именно "Автобаза" - то я соглашусь, этот тег уместен. Но здесь - не автобаза https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHWsf89v commented 2025-06-17 19:47:47 UTC by literan ♦6,674 |
 | 156744872 (Comments: 2) | Santanaloba53 (Discussed changesets: 63) | Hola Santaloba53, Vi que reabrieron este largo tramo de la autopista Pedernales que atraviesa la provincia sureña de Pedernales. Según todos los datos disponibles, la Carretera Enriquillo/RD-44 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/... commented 2025-06-17 19:24:19 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦53 |
| 167741367 (Comments: 2) | Asteliks (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hej, masz całkowitą rację – sam zacząłem kiedyś robić dokładnie coś takiego, ale niestety ktoś „sprytniejszy” cofnął cały mój wkład, bo uznał, że obszar nie uwzględnia wszystkich zasobów, a do tego dup... commented 2025-06-17 19:23:43 UTC by Asteliks ♦50 |
| 167714423 (Comments: 1) | BigLeo9101 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/709079486. Please remember that builing=church only means that this building looks like a church. If there is actually a church with services there, then add amenity = place_of_worship commented 2025-06-17 19:04:53 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167743716 (Comments: 1) | sandof (Discussed changesets: 2) | too big area for one changeset --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167743716 commented 2025-06-17 19:04:23 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦45 |
| 167743701 (Comments: 1) | sandof (Discussed changesets: 2) | too big area for one changeset --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167743701 commented 2025-06-17 19:04:09 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦45 |
| 167194734 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 83) | Reverted because of unnecessary node #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167752102 commented 2025-06-17 18:49:43 UTC by IvaLedinščak ♦30 |
| 167742995 (Comments: 1) | jarogers16 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be carefull! You move a crossing node (https://www.osm.org/node/188132775/history) more than 100 meters. I move the node back! commented 2025-06-17 18:44:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167747205 (Comments: 2) | Pitbiker (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Pitbiker, du hast hier die Deutschland-Relation bearbeitet. War das ein Versehen? Ich habe deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt. Viele Grüße David commented 2025-06-17 18:41:04 UTC by dadavid ♦410 |
| 167193652 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 83) | Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167751685 commented 2025-06-17 18:38:15 UTC by IvaLedinščak ♦30 |
| 167747086 (Comments: 1) | Pitbiker (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167751652 commented 2025-06-17 18:37:09 UTC by dadavid ♦410 |
| 166385094 (Comments: 5) | Trockennasenaffe (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hört sich gut an. Dann ist das ja soweit geklärt. Danke an Euch fürs mitmachen in der Sache hier. Peer commented 2025-06-17 18:31:34 UTC by Peer van Daalen ♦63 |
| 167749265 (Comments: 1) | Sockerich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Sockerich, willkommen bei OSM :) du hattest um eine Überprüfung deiner Änderung gebeten: Sieht gut aus :) nur die Telefonnummer wäre besser im Internationalen Format, also +49 615... Viele Grü&sz... commented 2025-06-17 18:28:50 UTC by dadavid ♦410 |
| 167749316 (Comments: 1) | kleinf97 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi kleinf97 :) passt name=Dr. Willi Stiehler hier nicht eher? name=Zahnarzt ist ja eher eine Beschreibung. Viele Grüße :) David https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen commented 2025-06-17 18:25:21 UTC by dadavid ♦410 |
| 167734062 (Comments: 1) | Vlad Mash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! When you adding new roads please be sure that they are connected to other roads to produce usable network for navigation. Specifically here one of steps ends connects to an area representing ... commented 2025-06-17 18:12:31 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 156701756 (Comments: 1) | pagliarini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cuidado, nesta edição vc deletou varios pontos e a relação de delimitação de alguns bairros. commented 2025-06-17 18:07:19 UTC by BladeTC ♦123 |
| 166646247 (Comments: 5) | StooJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! I like when changeset discussion goes well :) commented 2025-06-17 18:01:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
 | 163982112 (Comments: 5) | abdurohman (Discussed changesets: 8) | а ну хотя в последнем ченджсете все таки вижу что добавили подробности, ну ведь можно значит) спасибо! commented 2025-06-17 18:00:55 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦330 |
| 167739786 (Comments: 3) | hylke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahh.. oke.. laat het maar zo. Ik heb nog wel de spatie uit de postcode gehaald. Mvg eggie commented 2025-06-17 17:53:03 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167749538 (Comments: 1) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 16) | + 10 lutego, drzewa, słupki drogowe, brakujące parkingi rowerowe, ławki commented 2025-06-17 17:45:16 UTC by Bartekkmee ♦2 |
| 167743430 (Comments: 1) | Bernard PH1M (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. name=Zitbank heb ik verwijderd. Geen name= gebruiken voor beschrijvingen. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 167705980 (Comments: 1) | mpadco (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM, the reason is that software has a hard time undoing abbreviations. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167705980 commented 2025-06-17 17:02:26 UTC by Glassman ♦5,205 |
| 167717654 (Comments: 3) | Marvk (Discussed changesets: 3) | O.k. Danke commented 2025-06-17 16:46:31 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,299 |
| 167742475 (Comments: 1) | Nolan_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, J'ai vu que vous avez modifié des routes à Grande-Synthe en les passant comme des highway=construction parce qu'elles étaient fermées pour des travaux temporaires (quelques semaines). Il n'es... commented 2025-06-17 16:42:05 UTC by Alexb60 ♦9 |
| 167283164 (Comments: 3) | mstrbrid (Discussed changesets: 8) | You're right, but it does have implications for the design of the way. Often the shared ways are pavements (sidewalks) and are designed for pedestrian use. They are then frequently condoned for cycling by adding signage, but not necessarily rede... commented 2025-06-17 16:26:28 UTC by mstrbrid ♦23 |
| 167734098 (Comments: 3) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 202) | Tak samo nie byłem pewien czy teren firmy lepiej oznaczyć jako industrial, czy landuse=farmyard commented 2025-06-17 16:09:03 UTC by kubahahaha ♦391 |
| 140218507 (Comments: 1) | benoitdd (Discussed changesets: 25) | Salut Benoît, une note indique que la faculté de droit ne se trouve pas là, enfin pour le moment. sur le site web, il est indiqué que le campus sera prêt pour 2027 : https://www.univ-orleans.fr/fr/deg/decouvrir-0/pres... commented 2025-06-17 15:56:12 UTC by enezeg ♦27 |
| 167718702 (Comments: 2) | osm_poi_matchmaker (Discussed changesets: 33) | Github issue: https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker/issues/148 commented 2025-06-17 15:54:34 UTC by infeeeee ♦513 |
| 163502387 (Comments: 3) | Lyon-St-Clair (Discussed changesets: 84) | Je viens finalement de le passer en planned:, il n'y a pas encore de chantier ici. commented 2025-06-17 15:44:02 UTC by Syl ♦947 |
| 167699738 (Comments: 3) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 408) | Hi As you can see from my changes I map exclusively the territory where I live with a different logic and according to which it is necessary first of all to fix the highways already made and still missing because there are still too many buildings... commented 2025-06-17 15:41:52 UTC by PaoloLombardi ♦58 |
| 167700290 (Comments: 3) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 408) | Hi Thanks for your suggestion. I also found some landuses with almost 2000 nodes but I managed to "subdivide" them into smaller areas. I happened to join smaller ones instead because the layout is undoubtedly cleaner. But anyone... commented 2025-06-17 15:32:55 UTC by PaoloLombardi ♦58 |
 | 167743769 (Comments: 1) | D=SW (Discussed changesets: 9) | تحديث أحياء مكة المكرمة حسب https://umaps.balady.gov.sa/، مع حذف التعديلات غير الدقيقة وصعوبة تصحيحها، مع التقدير لجهود المساهم السابق. commented 2025-06-17 15:29:18 UTC by D=SW ♦9 |
| 164396326 (Comments: 5) | ExoticApple57 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merci pour ces infos : ne comprenant pas pourquoi, si cet établissement existait toujours, il n'avait pas de numéro finess, j'ai écrit à l'ARS pour en savoir plus. Je viens d'avoir leurs explications... commented 2025-06-17 14:58:15 UTC by Yunan973 ♦69 |
| 167742041 (Comments: 1) | Damian05 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-06-17 14:51:19 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167733428 (Comments: 4) | Haj@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | thaannkk youu ! and sorry for the trouble again commented 2025-06-17 14:39:37 UTC by Haj@ ♦1 |
| 166306880 (Comments: 3) | hu9o (Discussed changesets: 14) | Je reviens avec autre chose : le tag opening_hours semble avoir mal vécu le déménagement :D commented 2025-06-17 14:39:05 UTC by LudovicG ♦63 |
| 167412802 (Comments: 4) | Terra Nostra Mediterránea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, te animo a que sigas editando, puedes empezar editando la zona que conoces añadiendo elementos sencillos primero y guiandote con la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page Esta página es la referencia que todos usamo... commented 2025-06-17 14:37:26 UTC by lololailo ♦69 |
| 167740019 (Comments: 1) | inechcomtv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I think you pasted the tags in the wrong place. commented 2025-06-17 14:34:08 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
| 167739104 (Comments: 2) | mobileGEO (Discussed changesets: 6) | Mach ich. Danke für die rasche Sichtung. commented 2025-06-17 14:21:52 UTC by mobileGEO ♦4 |
| 167655684 (Comments: 1) | tadzik92 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Widzę, że w obu liniach ZaT do Dworca jeszcze pozostało kilka nieusuniętych elementów relacji na Jagiellońskiej i Focha commented 2025-06-17 14:12:11 UTC by kubzon7 ♦17 |
| 167680619 (Comments: 1) | hei_ssr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi hei_ssr, I have completed the drawing of bus route of KMB 98C. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167739903 You may refer to Patrickov's Tips for adding bus routes https://www.openstreetmap.org/use... commented 2025-06-17 14:01:25 UTC by samho1234567 ♦23 |
| 167734212 (Comments: 2) | brainwad (Discussed changesets: 7) | The painted markings are a different, lower meaning (they imply "___ gestattet"). See the Swiss tagging guidelines for the correspondence between tags and signs: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features#Cycle_and_Foot_Wa... commented 2025-06-17 13:56:35 UTC by brainwad ♦16 |
| 147565748 (Comments: 5) | Skywaltuh (Discussed changesets: 26) | Rozmawiałem już z administratorem na ten temat , permisję mam. Co do 1 podpunktu = widać, tylko lata orki i rabunkowej pracy człowieka doprowadziły do złagodzenia nasypów grodziska, nie do zniszczenia jak w przypadku grodów koło... commented 2025-06-17 13:56:09 UTC by Skywaltuh ♦16 |
| 167739249 (Comments: 1) | yaroslavrepin2013 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The data is taken from 2gis/Данные взяты из 2гис commented 2025-06-17 13:52:40 UTC by yaroslavrepin2013 ♦1 |
| 167722029 (Comments: 1) | Joshua Zajac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a publicly accessible business, or a private residence? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167722029 commented 2025-06-17 13:46:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,097 |
| 87707225 (Comments: 2) | Suerlaenner (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo, Das Anschlussgleis bis zum Zaun des Abfallbetriebes, als auch der Anschluss der BW sind mit Sh2-Scheiben (Schutzhalt) versehen und somit faktisch stillgelegt. commented 2025-06-17 13:33:46 UTC by Suerlaenner ♦8 |
| 167476899 (Comments: 6) | unqsh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ďakujem za upozornenie. commented 2025-06-17 13:32:41 UTC by unqsh ♦1 |
| 167737597 (Comments: 1) | Softmap (Discussed changesets: 4) | have you discussed this unreviewed import with community? Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ? See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-import-in-algeria/104175/6 commented 2025-06-17 13:08:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 144965351 (Comments: 1) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 107) | #mapycom user report #2846039 - "Hlavná rozvodná šachta BVS" - ako by ste to otagoval? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230095732 commented 2025-06-17 13:00:52 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦20 |
| 167572520 (Comments: 3) | TSt15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, nur wenn Objekte tatsächlich einen Eigennamen haben. Das ist hier offensichtlich nicht der Fall. Sonst wären die Wege in den Wäldern alle als Waldweg benannt. MFG commented 2025-06-17 12:59:55 UTC by MichS ♦152 |
| 167737237 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Chadwick (Discussed changesets: 24) | footway=link is appropriate for routing, but it also tends to be rendered. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dlink It's hard to map this kind of long, walkable traffic island / mid-road footway refuge prettily, and i... commented 2025-06-17 12:58:36 UTC by Andrew Chadwick ♦54 |
| 167737453 (Comments: 1) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dobrý deň, ďakujeme, že ste nás kontaktovali. V čase otvorenia turistických chodníkov po ukončení sezónnej uzávery (od 01.06.2025) bude pohyb návštevníkov v Monkovej do... commented 2025-06-17 12:56:57 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦20 |
| 167736613 (Comments: 1) | Llana_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-17 12:55:16 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167730991 (Comments: 1) | 1an1an (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-17 12:40:35 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167576034 (Comments: 1) | usbircan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, Yol isimlendirmelerinde tabelada yazdığı şekilde kısaltma yapılmadan yazılması gerekli. "Lilyum Sokağı" ya da "Lilyum Sokak" yol tabelasında hangisi ile belirtilmiş ise o şekilde kaydedilmesi gerekli. commented 2025-06-17 12:25:37 UTC by Burak Önder ♦2 |
| 167711363 (Comments: 1) | RyanGlen5302 (Discussed changesets: 1) | hey, don't forget source:addr=Kendall County on these, we want to make it clear that these are authoritative --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167711363 commented 2025-06-17 12:17:28 UTC by jcarlson ♦111 |
| 167494009 (Comments: 3) | Bad Driburger Touristik GmbH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vielen Dank, dazu habe ich die Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4810057 eröffnet. commented 2025-06-17 12:04:49 UTC by bielebog ♦268 |
| 166650730 (Comments: 1) | GPMapper (Discussed changesets: 52) | Dear, please correct the administrative boundaries of this center. This site belongs to a governorate Harub and was placed within the borders of another governorate. These borders are incorrect and accurate. Many observations have been put in place t... commented 2025-06-17 11:56:31 UTC by MOHAMMED07 ♦6 |
| 165636343 (Comments: 3) | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2025-06-17 11:51:16 UTC by NumisK ♦8 |
| 167591497 (Comments: 3) | LySioS (Discussed changesets: 22) | Merci pour la réponse. Avez-vous une idée de la cause de cet affichage bizarre. Je me demandais justement si je faisait une erreur, mais j'en suis moins sûr maintenant. commented 2025-06-17 11:49:45 UTC by Pan ♦50 |
| 165373582 (Comments: 2) | redfox_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour redfox_, N'ayant pas eu de réponse de ta part depuis plusieurs jours, je voulais t'informer que nous allons procéder au revert du changeset 165506264 dans lequel tu supprime une grande partie de la cartographie ... commented 2025-06-17 11:35:58 UTC by AnatoleFrance ♦5 |
| 167694893 (Comments: 2) | Rok73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mach das gerne. Entschuldige bitte meine fehlerhafte Bearbeitung. commented 2025-06-17 11:35:15 UTC by Rok73 ♦1 |
| 167187008 (Comments: 1) | IDOOH3 (Discussed changesets: 394) | Hi, Du hast hier (schon wieder) die falsche Adresse eingetragen. Außerdem ist das kein "adding", sonden eine Änderung. Manchmal schadet es nicht, sich Gedanken zu machen, wenn etwas schon anders in den Daten vorhanden ist ;) S... commented 2025-06-17 11:11:15 UTC by pyram ♦501 |
| 167732701 (Comments: 1) | Iga | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 57) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2588916011 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-06-17 11:00:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167693702 (Comments: 2) | jov2000 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Извините, пожалуйста. commented 2025-06-17 10:52:40 UTC by jov2000 ♦2 |
| 167384662 (Comments: 2) | NKA (Discussed changesets: 139) | toll=* ble erstattet med to noder med highway=toll_gantry. Det er ikke feil å bruke toll=*, men det vanlige i Norge er å bruke highway=toll_gantry. commented 2025-06-17 10:44:42 UTC by NKA ♦247 |
| 167692547 (Comments: 7) | Suhail Ahamad (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem, happy mapping! commented 2025-06-17 10:33:28 UTC by uknown-gryphus ♦36 |
| 167726834 (Comments: 1) | filbleu-keolistours (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, d'après la métropole, ces abris vélo non sécurisés sont financés par le SMT et font bien partie du réseau Fil Bleu (ils ont d'ailleurs le même picto que les abris sécuri... commented 2025-06-17 10:22:15 UTC by Vétérini ♦7 |
| 162996925 (Comments: 2) | The_ABM (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi AMB I wonder if you are familiar with this? You closed the Montesorilaan for two-wheelers at the 'bus lock'. The background photo BING is completely outdated. Please use PDOK ortho 2025. You have reversed all the things that I h... commented 2025-06-17 10:13:34 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167723923 (Comments: 1) | EGOLonline (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert, Windräder mit Lebenszyklus razed, damit sie nicht wieder von Luftbildmappern eingetragen werden. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf commented 2025-06-17 10:10:01 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,272 |
| 167266210 (Comments: 12) | speedbird36 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oké, bedankt voor het dubbelchecken. Het lijkt erop dat het nu afgerond kan worden. commented 2025-06-17 10:09:35 UTC by speedbird36 ♦1 |
| 167559770 (Comments: 2) | CarlosGeldo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Jordi: Gracias por la aclaración. Voy a desacer los cambios y los dejaré según el IGN. Un saludo! commented 2025-06-17 09:57:00 UTC by CarlosGeldo ♦1 |
| 167657345 (Comments: 1) | Stefan5639 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wegen 'review_requested': Hab die Änderung wieder zurückgesetzt, weil du mehrere Orte versehentlich verschoben hast. Eigentlich wolltest du nur eine Bahnverbindung einzeichnen, oder? Viele Grüße map ... commented 2025-06-17 09:54:12 UTC by map per ♦1,292 |
| 167728129 (Comments: 1) | SimonPoole (Discussed changesets: 47) | This was in Safenwil not Niederlenz commented 2025-06-17 09:44:39 UTC by SimonPoole ♦339 |
| 167728157 (Comments: 1) | SimonPoole (Discussed changesets: 47) | This was in Safenwil not Niederlenz commented 2025-06-17 09:43:52 UTC by SimonPoole ♦339 |
| 167726018 (Comments: 1) | FirefighterInOBK-112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wurde das alte Gebäude komplett abgerissen oder wird es für andere Zecke genutzt? Bei dem neuen Gerätehaus wurde wohl die gesamte Grundstücksfläche als Gebäude eingetragen. commented 2025-06-17 09:30:28 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,272 |
| 167682459 (Comments: 1) | prov13d (Discussed changesets: 1) | Because of 'review_requested': The edit looks good, thanks! commented 2025-06-17 09:23:22 UTC by map per ♦1,292 |
| 167726398 (Comments: 1) | Waldkoerperschaft Buching-Trauchgau (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Waldkoerperschaft Buching-Trauchgau, willkommen bei OSM und Danke für die Eintragung der Sperrung. Allerdings ist OSM kein "Verkehrsfunk" für so kurze Sperrungen. Die Dauer sollte mindestens 6 Monate betragen, wobei ... commented 2025-06-17 09:16:17 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,272 |
| 167402571 (Comments: 2) | Joan Denchev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Абсолютно правилно, не съм забелязъл, че има отделна точка за бензиностанциите. Сега ще го редактирам. Благодаря за обърнатото внимание :... commented 2025-06-17 09:12:17 UTC by Joan Denchev ♦1 |
| 167726550 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia, többen szóltak, hogy valótlan dolgokat szerkesztes. Ezen túl több száz changesetst készítesz ami miatt kezelhetetlenek a módosításaid. Ezeket kézzel visszavontam, d... commented 2025-06-17 09:11:36 UTC by grin ♦112 |
| 167726510 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia, többen szóltak, hogy valótlan dolgokat szerkesztes. Ezen túl több száz changesetst készítesz ami miatt kezelhetetlenek a módosításaid. Ezeket kézzel visszavontam, d... commented 2025-06-17 09:11:36 UTC by grin ♦112 |
| 167726444 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia, többen szóltak, hogy valótlan dolgokat szerkesztes. Ezen túl több száz changesetst készítesz ami miatt kezelhetetlenek a módosításaid. Ezeket kézzel visszavontam, d... commented 2025-06-17 09:11:36 UTC by grin ♦112 |
| 167726294 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia, többen szóltak, hogy valótlan dolgokat szerkesztes. Ezen túl több száz changesetst készítesz ami miatt kezelhetetlenek a módosításaid. Ezeket kézzel visszavontam, d... commented 2025-06-17 09:11:35 UTC by grin ♦112 |
| 167726205 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia, többen szóltak, hogy valótlan dolgokat szerkesztes. Ezen túl több száz changesetst készítesz ami miatt kezelhetetlenek a módosításaid. Ezeket kézzel visszavontam, d... commented 2025-06-17 09:11:35 UTC by grin ♦112 |
| 167725490 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia, többen szóltak, hogy valótlan dolgokat szerkesztes. Ezen túl több száz changesetst készítesz ami miatt kezelhetetlenek a módosításaid. Ezeket kézzel visszavontam, d... commented 2025-06-17 09:11:34 UTC by grin ♦112 |
| 167725412 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia, többen szóltak, hogy valótlan dolgokat szerkesztes. Ezen túl több száz changesetst készítesz ami miatt kezelhetetlenek a módosításaid. Ezeket kézzel visszavontam, d... commented 2025-06-17 09:11:34 UTC by grin ♦112 |
| 167725160 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia, többen szóltak, hogy valótlan dolgokat szerkesztes. Ezen túl több száz changesetst készítesz ami miatt kezelhetetlenek a módosításaid. Ezeket kézzel visszavontam, d... commented 2025-06-17 09:11:33 UTC by grin ♦112 |
| 167215860 (Comments: 2) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia! Egy állami cégnél dolgozom, friss, valós útvonalfelmérés alapján töltöm fel az adatokat, de még új vagyok, igyekszem felülvizsgálni a beérkezett ... commented 2025-06-17 09:01:14 UTC by Fiorentina ♦2 |
| 167727265 (Comments: 1) | TeamWithMe (Discussed changesets: 1) | warum Bänke in Tübingen und Deutschnofen im gleichen CS der nun riesig ist? Bitte Die CS klein halten. commented 2025-06-17 08:53:54 UTC by fs_LT ♦56 |
| 167316499 (Comments: 7) | mfxbe (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2025-06-17 08:52:55 UTC by map per ♦1,292 |
| 167257252 (Comments: 3) | BRD-ZDP (Discussed changesets: 2) | dzięki wielkie za poprawki! commented 2025-06-17 08:50:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| X | 167712238 (Comments: 1) | Loybilu (Discussed changesets: 6) | too big area, bad changeset --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167712238 commented 2025-06-17 08:40:43 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦45 |
| 167724494 (Comments: 1) | AlexioM1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Привет. natural=beach — это геологическое образование. leisure=beach_resort — это место развлечения. Если есть возможность, уточните. commented 2025-06-17 08:39:38 UTC by Глеб ♦134 |
| 167585145 (Comments: 1) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 14) | Defekt korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167727260 commented 2025-06-17 08:33:46 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,838 |
| 167682451 (Comments: 1) | borishag (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hoi Borishag, Ik zie dat ik hier een foutje gemaakt heb. Geen idee hoe dat gekomen is, maar de openingstijden zijn correct. Mijn excuses. Om je algemene vraag te beantwoorden: ik ben van mening dat geen openingstijden beter zijn dan openingstij... commented 2025-06-17 08:24:09 UTC by Herrieman ♦66 |
| X | 167707835 (Comments: 5) | Loybilu (Discussed changesets: 6) | No worries. Everyone can make mistakes and it's good if it can make us better. commented 2025-06-17 08:17:57 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 166253721 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 271) | Przez wyjechanie mam na myśli wyjazd od strony parkingu. Nie byłem świadomy wjazdu, który dodałeś- a czekaj, dopiero widzę, że to dodał kto inny https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388200900 No to ładnie... commented 2025-06-17 08:10:26 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 167656362 (Comments: 2) | Berend Veldkamp (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ik zou zweren dat het een glas container was, maar kan me natuurlijk vergissen, ik had hem pas later thuis ingevoerd nl. Iig zag het er nu anders uit dan op Streetview (opening aan de andere kant), dus er is wel _iets_ veranderd. Iemand moet er nog m... commented 2025-06-17 08:05:00 UTC by Berend Veldkamp ♦7 |
| 167536812 (Comments: 4) | Kulizoli (Discussed changesets: 11) | Szuper, köszi! Jobbak így az infók a teljes területen, nem csak az RCC-n, ezt is köszi! commented 2025-06-17 08:00:38 UTC by Kulizoli ♦2 |
| 167685679 (Comments: 1) | RoseOrRobot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, noch einen Hinweis Entschuldige bitte, aber wird länger ;-) Es ist zwar nicht unbedingt Konsens in der Community, aber vielleicht denkst du mal drüber nach. Du hast die Adresse der Fleischers an den POI gehangen und... commented 2025-06-17 07:55:42 UTC by berndw ♦580 |
| 167683461 (Comments: 2) | UD0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Super! Vielen lieben Dank! Werde es an einen Kollegen weiterleiten zum Einbetten. LG commented 2025-06-17 07:54:04 UTC by UD0 ♦1 |
| 163487519 (Comments: 1) | moturowiec (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nałożyłeś na siebie dwie drogi. Trasy rowerowe to nie ścieżki rowerowe. Trasy rowerowe dodajemy jako relacje do już istniejącej sieci dróg. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:route?uselang=pl commented 2025-06-17 07:53:07 UTC by olo81 ♦665 |
| 167722465 (Comments: 1) | metolefc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, "Tężnia solankowa" to nie nazwa :) commented 2025-06-17 07:41:41 UTC by YomanNH ♦303 |
| 167692496 (Comments: 2) | Geofreund1 (Discussed changesets: 139) | "warum hast du nicht auch noch bridge:name=Hindenburgbrücke am Straßen-Way getaggt?" Darum: "The bridge:name=* and similar tags can be used to specify the name of an implicit bridge where name=* is already used for the... commented 2025-06-17 07:39:38 UTC by Geofreund1 ♦285 |
| 166602626 (Comments: 4) | Tiziano_Bz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Buongiorno, si hai ragione ho modificato e mi scuso per l'errore. commented 2025-06-17 07:36:22 UTC by Tiziano_Bz ♦1 |
| 167719931 (Comments: 2) | yazanarouri (Discussed changesets: 3) | I reverted this change. commented 2025-06-17 07:30:58 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
| 161096595 (Comments: 1) | pastry (Discussed changesets: 1) | zmieniłeś na kostkę a tu jest asfalt commented 2025-06-17 07:26:27 UTC by taxi301 ♦84 |
| 167661705 (Comments: 2) | Stratula (Discussed changesets: 7) | Принято. Поправлю. commented 2025-06-17 07:23:42 UTC by Stratula ♦14 |
| 167640667 (Comments: 4) | Buurmanenbuurmanopreis (Discussed changesets: 4) | I will place a note. We have a website (https://www.schiphol.nl/nl/projecten/alle-projecten-op-schiphol/bus/) with information but it doesn't have that much detail you need. The drawings are not public but I'am allowed to share. commented 2025-06-17 07:16:46 UTC by Buurmanenbuurmanopreis ♦2 |
| 165720959 (Comments: 3) | DrNRC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yeah, I remember thinking that it'd be a pain to edit when I walked them a while ago! If you do end up splitting further, try to keep the way history in the most prominent (longest, maybe?) way, and I'd suggest including an incline tag on t... commented 2025-06-17 07:11:35 UTC by mstrbrid ♦23 |
| 167663040 (Comments: 1) | Golden Axolotl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Имах предвид demolished:building да замени building. Коригирах го. commented 2025-06-17 06:58:09 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦656 |
| 167662373 (Comments: 1) | Luke197 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/12917890014. What is the mean of the tag naturalna = tree? Did you mean natural=tree? Please notice also a name is no description (or species) commented 2025-06-17 06:56:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| X | 167711437 (Comments: 2) | Loybilu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sorry. I’ve made some cleanup on the substance value. But for sure I should have split this one as the salt complex in Namibia is a coherent group. commented 2025-06-17 06:51:08 UTC by Loybilu ♦6 |
| 167710640 (Comments: 2) | Loybilu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sorry guys, I’ve made some minor cleanup on the substance value (mostly typos, incoherent qualifications and so) on a small number of objects each time. I’ve worked case by case not thinking global boundaries were a problem. I will find a... commented 2025-06-17 06:44:23 UTC by smilou ♦5 |
| 167693583 (Comments: 2) | bitfix (Discussed changesets: 7) | Danke für die Antwort! Ich habe jetzt einen neuen way für den Zaun gemacht. Der Zaun ist nicht geschlossen, d.h. nehme ich an, dass man das nicht ein einem way mappen kann. Grüße Georg commented 2025-06-17 06:39:17 UTC by bitfix ♦7 |
| 167078167 (Comments: 22) | 2kdt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo @DD1GJ, das ist richtig, ändert aber immer noch nichts an der Tatsache das einige Hydranten falsch sind und dies den Nachbarwehren angezeigt werden. Wie schon geschrieben, haben wir jetzt dann Führungssitzung, hier darf dann das g... commented 2025-06-17 06:14:04 UTC by 2kdt ♦1 |
| 167707259 (Comments: 2) | BenZackBumm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo daganzdaanda, dank dir für dein Feedback. Ich wusste das noch nicht. In der Tat wurden alle Hausnummern vor Ort erfasst. Meine Mutter wohnt dort, ihr Nachbar hat dies in meinem Auftrag getan. Den BayernAtlas Link habe ich nur zur V... commented 2025-06-17 05:59:11 UTC by BenZackBumm ♦1 |
| 167645424 (Comments: 1) | VáclavS (Discussed changesets: 12) | Zdravím, cestu je potrebné rozdeliť a následne pridať do relácie, alebo rozdeliť a potom z prebytočnej časti reláciu odstrániť. Rozdelenie sa robí pravým klikom na daný bod a potom ... commented 2025-06-17 05:54:25 UTC by Filip009 ♦939 |
| 167701496 (Comments: 1) | EABCOR13 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I reverted these edits because you are adding ways with no tags on top of existing roadways. I encourage you to do the built-in editor tutorial, and take a look at the wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ ) If you explain what you are trying... commented 2025-06-17 05:44:15 UTC by citrula ♦835 |
| 167721135 (Comments: 1) | Tommybara (Discussed changesets: 27) | Correct url: https://quochoi.vn/tintuc/Pages/tin-hoat-dong-cua-quoc-hoi.aspx?ItemID=94623 commented 2025-06-17 05:25:28 UTC by Tommybara ♦82 |
| 167720694 (Comments: 1) | Tommybara (Discussed changesets: 27) | Correct url: https://quochoi.vn/tintuc/Pages/tin-hoat-dong-cua-quoc-hoi.aspx?ItemID=94623 commented 2025-06-17 05:25:17 UTC by Tommybara ♦82 |
| 167720141 (Comments: 1) | Tommybara (Discussed changesets: 27) | Correct url: https://quochoi.vn/tintuc/Pages/tin-hoat-dong-cua-quoc-hoi.aspx?ItemID=94623 commented 2025-06-17 05:25:10 UTC by Tommybara ♦82 |
| 167677168 (Comments: 1) | Splendidindia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi OP The convention in India is to keep name tag as English while keeping the corresponding local name in the respective name:language tag. Can you please avoid renaming all roads and especially also not remove the original information? ht... commented 2025-06-17 05:13:12 UTC by kasa kai ♦4 |
| 167203557 (Comments: 2) | happilymappingrway (Discussed changesets: 23) | I am trying to show the difference between the Patriarchate administration and the church which is on the compound. I was not finished with deciding the best way to transfer tags froms prior entries. I am open to suggestions. Should the church entran... commented 2025-06-17 05:09:01 UTC by happilymappingrway ♦7 |
| 167719304 (Comments: 3) | Ozora Solar (Discussed changesets: 1) | I also mapped the building and tagged as building=yes commented 2025-06-17 04:52:09 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
| 160674306 (Comments: 2) | Rigi03 (Discussed changesets: 20) | No response so tahgged as grass and amend relation commented 2025-06-17 04:45:10 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167710312 (Comments: 1) | Spacegirl_jsc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Building numbers are probably more suited for ref= than name=. What do you think? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref commented 2025-06-17 04:43:17 UTC by citrula ♦835 |
| 167710403 (Comments: 2) | Brittany Cole (Discussed changesets: 1) | Those are actually play equipment for the dogs. I promise, I am there every day and that is the location. I cross referenced with google maps satellite view as well. commented 2025-06-17 04:42:56 UTC by Brittany Cole ♦1 |
| 167672639 (Comments: 1) | Iam a Good Developer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplicated highways removed commented 2025-06-17 04:36:05 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167718249 (Comments: 1) | Eduard Schindler (Discussed changesets: 2) | Does this business have a storefront or office? It looks like the address might just be for a PO box? commented 2025-06-17 04:16:43 UTC by citrula ♦835 |
| 167717687 (Comments: 1) | Joe B Pendejo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. You added this as a zoo - not sure if you realize, but these edits are visible to everyone. I have retagged it for you. commented 2025-06-17 04:11:23 UTC by citrula ♦835 |
| 167630699 (Comments: 5) | Matteo Calosi (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ok, probabilmente le tue valutazioni sono più corrette. Le CTR in questo caso sono un po' strane, in effetti il punto 2224.4 sembra la selletta e non la vetta, mentre la vetta non è quotata. Forse sarebbe meglio mettere una nota pe... commented 2025-06-17 03:34:50 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦99 |
| 167702625 (Comments: 1) | Garten100 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Garten100, bitte keine Objekte löschen die eindeutig vor Ort existieren. Wege mit Zugangsbeschränkung werden in OSM nicht gelöscht sondern mit access-Tags versehen. Ich habe alle Löschungen in Changeset 167719369 re... commented 2025-06-17 03:29:29 UTC by martinst ♦317 |
| 167655228 (Comments: 5) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 5) | I suppose it doesn't have to be but there's 2 reasons I'd say I do: 1) I don't know how to split it up automatically in JOSM. 2) The wiki page for this project is updated each week with the changeset link so you can ... commented 2025-06-17 03:23:51 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦21 |
| 159952037 (Comments: 2) | Siobkhan (Discussed changesets: 15) | спасибо за замечание, но, к сожалению, качество снимка не позволило судить однозначно. на будущее учту commented 2025-06-17 03:13:19 UTC by Siobkhan ♦18 |
| 167717852 (Comments: 1) | SwanPek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dsport might be a more appropriate tag for this --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167717852 commented 2025-06-17 02:52:47 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167588949 (Comments: 1) | urfinvaltum (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18346 commented 2025-06-17 02:52:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889442 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166888991 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889476 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889561 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889504 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889059 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889567 (Comments: 2) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889212 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889230 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889033 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166889430 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887930 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887909 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887874 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887781 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887727 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887657 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887511 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887238 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166888956 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166888947 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886833 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166887206 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886978 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886950 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886928 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886900 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886705 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886502 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166882094 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886209 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166886425 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881980 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881913 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881749 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881482 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881418 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881070 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166880898 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881065 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881172 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166881294 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718816 commented 2025-06-17 02:39:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166879007 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166654811 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166654787 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166654732 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166654715 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166654676 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166654556 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166654530 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166654480 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166119380 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166119311 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166119289 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166119151 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166119141 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166119093 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166119082 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166119057 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118941 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118799 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118741 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118554 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118543 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118534 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118486 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118441 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118394 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118388 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118283 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118259 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118224 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118195 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118149 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118112 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166118062 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166117941 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166117771 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166117745 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166117724 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166117653 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166040295 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166040250 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166040092 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166040065 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166040026 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166040012 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039794 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039733 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039817 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039903 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039911 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746 commented 2025-06-17 02:34:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039555 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039519 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039453 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039428 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039410 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039055 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166038954 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039038 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039338 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039230 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039198 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166039166 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166036916 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166038849 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166038784 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166038740 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166038436 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166038421 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166038349 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166038327 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166037624 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166037201 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166036655 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165992029 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166016408 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166016360 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166016290 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 166016150 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165992329 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165992308 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165992259 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991896 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991701 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:31:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991011 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991607 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991522 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991282 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991183 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991165 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165991101 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165989216 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165990917 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165990889 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165990226 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165990000 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165988761 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165989167 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165988691 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165988593 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165988572 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705 commented 2025-06-17 02:30:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167597314 (Comments: 1) | Charliewl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cao tốc Cà Mau - Đất Mũi hiện chưa được khởi công xây dựng và hoạt động chính thức,vì vậy đường này đã được ẩn dưới dạng proposed Cao tốc n&agrav... commented 2025-06-17 02:27:16 UTC by Trần Sung ♦4 |
| 165982509 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165982650 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165982556 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165982466 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165982217 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165981944 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165981899 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165981851 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165976126 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165975038 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165974900 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165974753 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165974619 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165974400 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165971174 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165459779 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438842 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438921 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165439308 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165439278 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165439241 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165439069 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165439065 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165439039 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438989 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438959 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438941 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438555 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438760 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438719 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438614 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438562 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438517 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438472 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438461 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438447 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438440 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438224 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438436 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438431 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438423 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438412 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438402 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438334 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438320 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438295 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438176 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438203 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438187 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438157 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616 commented 2025-06-17 02:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438093 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438129 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438115 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438067 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438105 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438098 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438047 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438086 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438032 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437944 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438000 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438010 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165438016 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437858 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437918 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437585 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437628 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437700 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437785 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437936 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437923 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437820 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437505 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437537 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437371 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437437 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437474 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437265 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437303 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437187 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437255 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437238 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165436930 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437017 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437098 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437121 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165436954 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165437082 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165436396 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165436640 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165436673 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165436828 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165434969 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165435583 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165435959 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165436148 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165435044 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165427748 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165434713 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165427694 (Comments: 1) | thetim0 (Discussed changesets: 242) | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718578 commented 2025-06-17 02:22:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167435825 (Comments: 1) | ZOOM-FR (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - node with no details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718404 commented 2025-06-17 02:11:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167713618 (Comments: 1) | U42 (Discussed changesets: 2) | That's a big survey commented 2025-06-17 01:44:36 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
 | 166029417 (Comments: 1) | alibelsalinasr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Qual sentido de adicionar uma área totalmente aleatória? É importação? Estão conferindo com as imagens de satélite? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2025-06-17 01:42:12 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,174 |
| 166052807 (Comments: 1) | NadiaBritez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Por que remover a tag "wood"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166052807 commented 2025-06-17 01:39:06 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,174 |
| 163521458 (Comments: 1) | sirnigelgresley (Discussed changesets: 5) | Emu Mountain Road should be classified as motorway as there are motorway restrictions between Walter Hay Drive and Sunshine Motorway commented 2025-06-17 01:24:10 UTC by Scottie0001 ♦44 |
| 167717440 (Comments: 2) | BRWNC (Discussed changesets: 1) | I deleted your coarse landuse boundary as it already mapped correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820233155#map=18/-34.572499/150.750857 commented 2025-06-17 01:18:17 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
 | 167672887 (Comments: 1) | Torey360 (Discussed changesets: 35) | la ciclovía es separada con algo físico o forma parte de la calle? 🤔 commented 2025-06-17 01:13:22 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,571 |
| 167716477 (Comments: 1) | AlienChex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, there has been recent discussion about changing roadway classifications on our community forum. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/recent-road-hierarchy-retagging-nsw-sydney/131206/4 commented 2025-06-17 01:03:58 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
| 167596482 (Comments: 3) | Inapropro (Discussed changesets: 2) | Only section I would consider not part of the base within the airport boundaries the hazardous cargo pad and related taxiways or the airport control tower but looking at zoning https://geoportal.hawaii.gov/datasets/cchnl::zoning-5/about, I'm pre... commented 2025-06-17 00:51:53 UTC by Falkons ♦10 |
| 167596556 (Comments: 4) | Inapropro (Discussed changesets: 2) | I can see that for this edit specifically and will revert it and try to figure out how to label the specified areas from before within the military zone. Will comment on the other on why it is not military though. commented 2025-06-17 00:18:23 UTC by Inapropro ♦2 |
| 167694584 (Comments: 1) | rui228 (Discussed changesets: 33) | https://www.aldi.pt/ website spells it as "ALDI", not "Aldi", hence that's what I chose when unifying the tagging. Do you want to discuss and/or change it (for all the stores, not just this one)? commented 2025-06-16 23:02:22 UTC by mikedld ♦24 |
| 167070033 (Comments: 4) | donovaly (Discussed changesets: 34) | > In D ist es recht inkonsistent. Eigentlich nicht, wenn wir beide von Route-Relationen und nicht von Stop-Area-Relationen reden. > bei den Nodes für die HPs, die ich erstellt habe, willst du das diese Node nicht Mitglied der... commented 2025-06-16 22:48:44 UTC by ToniE ♦1,225 |
 | 166203199 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 383) | Bonjour, attention aux noms de rue, qui ne contiennent pas d'indications comme « Bât. C » commented 2025-06-16 22:47:25 UTC by Stereo ♦359 |
 | 157056611 (Comments: 3) | jbruechert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke dir. Das mit den ÖBB habe ich bisher genommen. Nur verstehe ich nicht, warum ein Bahnhof wie Skopje dort nicht drin ist. Überhaupt finde ich keine IBNRs für Nordmazedonien. commented 2025-06-16 22:39:17 UTC by donovaly ♦37 |
| 165425601 (Comments: 2) | donovaly (Discussed changesets: 34) | This was a mistake. I remember I had to split the path and then maybe forgot to check the level settings. I fixed it now commented 2025-06-16 22:36:48 UTC by donovaly ♦37 |
| 167197713 (Comments: 2) | donovaly (Discussed changesets: 34) | Wieso löschst du die Relation? Mir geht es um die Verknüpfung von Wissen. Es gibt einen Wikipedia-Artikel, also ist es relevant. Leute wohnen in der gegend, wollen wissen, wo eine bahnlinie mal lang ging. Und überhaupt, warum st&oum... commented 2025-06-16 22:13:45 UTC by donovaly ♦37 |
| 167677511 (Comments: 4) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 56) | dodaję miejsca parkowania , potem na miejscu dodam parkomaty i godziny commented 2025-06-16 22:09:16 UTC by taxi301 ♦84 |
| 167700108 (Comments: 2) | YSavitski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie było tematu faktycznie rok temu jakiś budynek tam powstawał. Miłego tygodnia :) commented 2025-06-16 22:08:07 UTC by bartgron ♦133 |
| 167714537 (Comments: 1) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 29) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-06-16 22:01:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167701394 (Comments: 2) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 29) | zapomniałem o addr:place i powpisywałem wszystko w addr:street, i teraz od nowa poprawiać 200 adresów 😭 commented 2025-06-16 21:56:08 UTC by RafaBoski ♦8 |
| 166232670 (Comments: 1) | MatthewAJackson (Discussed changesets: 3) | Do you know if anyone's hiked to these in recent history? commented 2025-06-16 21:52:59 UTC by mappingman2 ♦3 |
| 167665118 (Comments: 2) | Michael712 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Moin, Danke für den Hinweis. Das liegt vermutlich an der 20er Zone, da nun der Parallelweg eine kürzere Fahrtzeit hat. Im Schützengraben fehlt aber definitiv auch was, da sind mindestens drei traffic calmings, die noch nicht eing... commented 2025-06-16 21:39:22 UTC by Michael712 ♦19 |
| 167592360 (Comments: 2) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 166) | Zover ik kan zien is staat wheelchair er nog steeds maar inderdaad source=survey heb ik verwijderd want de locatie is iets gewijzigd en alle tags dus niets meer van de survey over. Zoals ik op het forum schreef, om het me zelf makkelijk te mak... commented 2025-06-16 21:29:19 UTC by emvee ♦366 |
| 86535600 (Comments: 2) | RobinNoodles (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello AngocA, This account is no longer active so I’ll do my best to answer your questions on their behalf. It looks like the dragged node in changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167071198 was a mistake made by a d... commented 2025-06-16 21:06:04 UTC by Baconcrisp ♦135 |
| 167674638 (Comments: 1) | leonacostaok (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-06-16 21:04:34 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 167690108 (Comments: 1) | kuckstein (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Kuckstein, danke für den Eintrag. Ein paar Kleinigkeiten: Bei den Wochentagen bitte englische Abkürzungen verwenden. Diese werden von Drittapps konsequent ausgelesen. Mo/We/Th kannst du zusammenfassen Mo, We, Th 11:00-18... commented 2025-06-16 20:58:02 UTC by limes11 ♦877 |
| 167700583 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 408) | Don't touch please! Now is not important to add powerline objectts. We need before to add highways and it's more important. Thanks. commented 2025-06-16 20:44:29 UTC by PaoloLombardi ♦58 |
| 167635707 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 229) | Thank you! commented 2025-06-16 20:42:53 UTC by nivek101 ♦1 |
| 167701200 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 408) | Don't touch please! I'm mapping on the field. Thanks! commented 2025-06-16 20:41:08 UTC by PaoloLombardi ♦58 |
| 167712302 (Comments: 1) | Nieciszów_pl (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-06-16 20:40:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167644386 (Comments: 1) | dom-666 (Discussed changesets: 62) | hi, what is the source of these footways? commented 2025-06-16 20:40:42 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 167711741 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 176) | Id\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4806080\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-06-16 22:16\tclosed\tok 4806087\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-06-16 22:16\tclosed\tok 4806082\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-06-16 22:16\tclosed\tok 4806089\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-06-16... commented 2025-06-16 20:26:42 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,334 |
| 167711814 (Comments: 1) | BladeTC (Discussed changesets: 41) | correção: Parte 6B commented 2025-06-16 20:22:29 UTC by BladeTC ♦123 |
| 167700759 (Comments: 1) | nixetus (Discussed changesets: 1) | не злоупотребляйте access-тегами. Подробнее см. у меня в профиле commented 2025-06-16 20:22:17 UTC by literan ♦6,674 |
| 167653905 (Comments: 1) | vrrdv (Discussed changesets: 6) | ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с правилами адресации, чтобы не делать ошибки: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов commented 2025-06-16 20:18:25 UTC by literan ♦6,674 |
| 167708591 (Comments: 3) | MarcosdeE (Discussed changesets: 6) | -- Nevermind; got it work. I apologize if I caused any inconvenience. commented 2025-06-16 19:54:38 UTC by WilliamHarrison ♦15 |
| 167663774 (Comments: 1) | sw_uwu (Discussed changesets: 14) | netter Changeset-Kommentar commented 2025-06-16 19:54:24 UTC by Sykkel (Ossfin) ♦1 |
| 75055194 (Comments: 3) | PanierAvide (Discussed changesets: 18) | Après vérification il s'agit bien de mémoriaux, en l’occurrence du "Mémorial départemental de la guerre d'Algérie et des combats de Tunisie et Maroc", sous la forme de 3 stèle... commented 2025-06-16 19:49:37 UTC by PèreForez ♦13 |
| 167318025 (Comments: 1) | pazzazzo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour pazzazzo, je suis passé hier en bus rue Malbec et je confirme que contrairement à ce qui m'avait été signalé sur boites-a-livres.fr la boite est toujours là, je l'ai donc restaurée. commented 2025-06-16 19:45:17 UTC by symac ♦9 |
| 167696879 (Comments: 1) | Friede B (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Friede B Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Wenn ich https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167696879 anschaue, hast du nix mit `hw=service` geän... commented 2025-06-16 19:42:18 UTC by habi ♦1,833 |
| 167709849 (Comments: 2) | Rogier Receveur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Feedback.. Is Mille Fleurs Apartments de naam van het hotel? We kennen ook tourism=apartment https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dapartment MVG eggie commented 2025-06-16 19:33:49 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167703900 (Comments: 1) | alcedo*atthis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-16 19:29:28 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167700086 (Comments: 1) | pahlavi_temecula (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi there :) are there two identical Puma Cafeterias in this place? cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167700086 commented 2025-06-16 19:08:24 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167680771 (Comments: 1) | MariusEbe (Discussed changesets: 54) | Warum? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167680771 commented 2025-06-16 19:07:12 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167678303 (Comments: 1) | MariusEbe (Discussed changesets: 54) | bad choice of sources https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167678303 commented 2025-06-16 19:05:47 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 137885617 (Comments: 1) | streckengaenger21 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo streckengaenger21, Du hast vor 2 Jahren die Relation der stillgelegten Trasse der Ulstertalbahn bearbeitet. Ich bin aktuell in dieser Gegen tätig und werde in Kürze alle Trassensegmente, die heute vollständig überbau... commented 2025-06-16 18:53:13 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦52 |
| 167692733 (Comments: 1) | Rickspe (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Rick! Welke luchtbeelden heb je hier gebruikt? Met de quick ortho 8cm zie ik een beetje een uitlijningsverschil - maar dit kan aan mij liggen: https://l.pltbg.nl/f079e8.jpg commented 2025-06-16 18:51:36 UTC by jxpsert ♦86 |
| 151543552 (Comments: 3) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 110) | Hallo ticki_52, magst du bitte die Wiki-Seite verlinken, wo das so steht? Ich vermute, du hast da etwas falsch verstanden oder die Wiki-Seite bedarf einer Überarbeitung. Es ist in der Tat richtig, POIs nicht am Gebäude zu erfa... commented 2025-06-16 18:51:14 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,142 |
| 167661211 (Comments: 2) | Endres Pelka (Discussed changesets: 49) | Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit, korrigiert! Ich hatte zuerst gar nicht darauf geachtet, wo genau die Zeichen stehen: Hauptsache vor der Einfahrt auf die Kreisfahrbahn :) commented 2025-06-16 18:46:47 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦390 |
| 167680493 (Comments: 1) | Grisu_Neuss (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Da die Straße in Wirklichkeit ja scheinbar weit weg und woanders ist, sieht das plausibel aus Viele Grüße aus dem Neusser Süden commented 2025-06-16 18:46:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
| 160611912 (Comments: 5) | tv0 (Discussed changesets: 27) | This is such an interesting topic and it would be great to have more discussion on the forum. commented 2025-06-16 18:44:49 UTC by tv0 ♦16 |
| 166988145 (Comments: 1) | vootza (Discussed changesets: 22) | Пожалуйста, будьте внимательны - вы всем зданиям в этом районе проставили roof:colour = gray, roof:shape=pyramidal, когда это явно не соответствует действи... commented 2025-06-16 18:43:32 UTC by Takuto ♦49 |
| 167670034 (Comments: 3) | andrzej_aa (Discussed changesets: 6) | masz racje, zmieniła się organizacja, byłem, ale jak zwykle zrobili to w nieuprawniony sposób i zgaduj zgadula commented 2025-06-16 18:38:29 UTC by Yog Sot ♦216 |
| 167697726 (Comments: 1) | Nathalie2102 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395746029 passt der Umriss nicht zu den Gebäuden, wie sie auf dem Luftbild erkennbar si... commented 2025-06-16 18:32:50 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
| 167676925 (Comments: 4) | RainerHa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zur Info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F commented 2025-06-16 18:28:10 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,299 |
| 167702396 (Comments: 1) | saman83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | reverted commented 2025-06-16 18:26:52 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 167594549 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 6) | Acabo de escribir en otro changeset, pero no son claros los mensajes. commented 2025-06-16 18:18:27 UTC by AngocA ♦184 |
| 167593345 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. Hemos visto que hacer bastantes contribuciones en el mapa, principalmente por el lado de Santander. Se necesita mucho. Sin embargo, el comentario de los changeset no es claro, si me parece que pones letras aleatorias. Procura describir las c... commented 2025-06-16 18:18:02 UTC by AngocA ♦184 |
| 167705008 (Comments: 1) | Waldhüter (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hallo Waldhüter, ein letztes Mal wende ich mich an Dich mit der Bitte, Dich unbedingt an den Diskussionen zu aufgegebenen Bahnstrecken zu beteiligen. Du solltest inzwischen mehrere Nachrichten auf verschiedenen Kanälen erhalten haben. Es ma... commented 2025-06-16 18:08:49 UTC by Mammi71 ♦248 |
| 167705992 (Comments: 1) | Waldhüter (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hallo Waldhüter, ein letztes Mal wende ich mich an Dich mit der Bitte, Dich unbedingt an den Diskussionen zu aufgegebenen Bahnstrecken zu beteiligen. Du solltest inzwischen mehrere Nachrichten auf verschiedenen Kanälen erhalten haben. Es ma... commented 2025-06-16 18:08:27 UTC by Mammi71 ♦248 |
| 167705864 (Comments: 1) | jmapb (Discussed changesets: 49) | Human error uploading changeset -- comment should be "update and align pois", source should be "survey;local knowledge;nyorthos;bing aerial;business websites" commented 2025-06-16 17:48:04 UTC by jmapb ♦401 |
| 167544818 (Comments: 5) | Kulizoli (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ok, nem sürgős, csak ne felejtődjenek így. Sajnos sok szerkesztő van aki az első próbálkozás után feladja. commented 2025-06-16 17:40:48 UTC by infeeeee ♦513 |
| 167704691 (Comments: 2) | Endres Pelka (Discussed changesets: 49) | Poprawione commented 2025-06-16 17:34:41 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦390 |
| 167577141 (Comments: 1) | Jon Hanson (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Jon, I hope this message finds you well. Could you please clarify the reasoning behind removing the information for the Denver Museum of Nature and Science from the building and integrating it into a new node? This change has resu... commented 2025-06-16 17:34:12 UTC by VLD170 ♦9 |
| 167644159 (Comments: 5) | LudojadTygrysi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wszystkiego najlepszego. Pozdrawiam. commented 2025-06-16 17:31:28 UTC by LudojadTygrysi ♦1 |
| 167662875 (Comments: 3) | ChristianB-112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo ChristianB-112, vielen Dank für die schnelle Rückmeldung! Gruß Svalbard commented 2025-06-16 17:31:10 UTC by Svalbard ♦153 |
| 167597224 (Comments: 1) | apelio1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for the contribution - a couple suggestions: access=no will exclude horses (and bicycles). removing access= and adding vehicle=no might be better here. consider adding barrier=debris (or another barrier= value) to a node where the dozer... commented 2025-06-16 16:58:27 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦100 |
| 167702660 (Comments: 1) | NikitPyr (Discussed changesets: 1) | здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. вы проверили на местности, там действительно 1а? commented 2025-06-16 16:53:16 UTC by 4004 ♦1,882 |
| 167703359 (Comments: 1) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 29) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-06-16 16:51:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167693888 (Comments: 3) | antidood1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem.. commented 2025-06-16 16:30:30 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167701662 (Comments: 1) | whereskarlo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi ... The hairdresser is already mapped. Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution. Greetz.. eggie commented 2025-06-16 16:30:05 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 159770688 (Comments: 1) | maurice2010 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hallo Maurice2010, Du hast hier in Schifferstadt diverse Punkte und Linien ohne jegliche Tags hinterlassen, was überhaupt keinen Sinn macht. Den Punkt 11727637584 zum Beispiel (nahe der Haltestelle Stadtwerke) hast Du schon 3x bearbeitet, aber e... commented 2025-06-16 16:26:48 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦52 |
| 167658974 (Comments: 3) | Andreas Binder (Discussed changesets: 93) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12917696827 commented 2025-06-16 16:08:39 UTC by Andreas Binder ♦254 |
| 41300315 (Comments: 1) | devot (Discussed changesets: 5) | Is the cave accessible or closed/private property? commented 2025-06-16 16:04:42 UTC by OSMScout ♦1 |
| 167656551 (Comments: 1) | HobbieWoman (Discussed changesets: 3) | As I've mentioned twice already (once in http://osm.org/changeset/167156687), you can't be crossing fairway lines with other golf features. Not to mention the fact that you are drawing a fairway where another fairway already exists. Please ... commented 2025-06-16 15:56:42 UTC by b-jazz ♦636 |
| 143573706 (Comments: 4) | Skywaltuh (Discussed changesets: 26) | druga sprawa, to teraz tak czytając ogół, można dojść do wniosku, że Pan to jakiś niedoszły Strażnik Teksasu - Zachodniopomorskiego, bo nigdzie indziej nie widzę takiej zawziętej (na lata 2023-2024) obrony obiektów zach.pom.... commented 2025-06-16 15:55:32 UTC by Skywaltuh ♦16 |
| 167062607 (Comments: 1) | Milibiakus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, auch hier noch einmal die Bitte, Hydranten nicht mit Straßen zu verbinden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-06-16 15:49:12 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
| 167695627 (Comments: 1) | Hoeve Witteborg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, De format van phone= heb ik aangepast naar +31........... internationaal. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-16 15:39:31 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 140181717 (Comments: 5) | Skywaltuh (Discussed changesets: 26) | Wszelkie komentarze powyżej są nieważne, albowiem rok temu (jak szybko idzie ten czas) pisałem na discordzie, Co do chodnika, jeśli wróci Pan pio2 to chciałbym zauważyć, że wśród starych lokalsów taka nazwa się uta... commented 2025-06-16 15:36:44 UTC by Skywaltuh ♦16 |
| 164436451 (Comments: 4) | arrhurr (Discussed changesets: 4) | wysłałem W z błaganiem o przeczytanie commented 2025-06-16 15:17:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167620882 (Comments: 5) | arrhurr (Discussed changesets: 4) | zachęca do robienia mniejszych edycji: część sensowna była ale zmiksowana z psuciem commented 2025-06-16 15:16:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167693853 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 83) | Removing restrictions from a roundabout #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167699052 commented 2025-06-16 15:00:40 UTC by TinPetreković ♦48 |
| 163688832 (Comments: 3) | mikestalker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Перепрошую і дякую. commented 2025-06-16 14:50:07 UTC by mikestalker ♦1 |
| 164672894 (Comments: 2) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks! Sorry im not sure what happened there :( commented 2025-06-16 14:44:17 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦30 |
| 167591350 (Comments: 1) | rletelier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Borró un barrio. Ya no existe? o fue un error? saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167591350 commented 2025-06-16 14:39:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,334 |
| 167652956 (Comments: 1) | MarioFunch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. Cancellando una way hai creato un buco nella relazione del percorso N7 Ivo commented 2025-06-16 14:34:35 UTC by Jrachi ♦761 |
| 167694000 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 383) | Ça rime pas à grand chose de dire qu'un EHPAD est ouvert 24h/24... Revert --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167694000 commented 2025-06-16 14:16:01 UTC by lmagreault ♦166 |
| 167665149 (Comments: 1) | MarkLammers21 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bedankt voor het toevoegen. Er zitten wel wat fouten in deze wijziging: - Het gaat hier om een gepland pad. De correcte tag is dan highway=proposed. De tag highway=construction wordt pas gebruikt vanaf het begin van de werkzaamheden. - Bij een ... commented 2025-06-16 14:13:13 UTC by A67-A67 ♦919 |
| 167638207 (Comments: 1) | ADIGERNAPOLI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1395435227. What is the mean of the tag wilayah = desa sungai terap ? commented 2025-06-16 14:11:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167696480 (Comments: 1) | crisboon (Discussed changesets: 12) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-06-16 14:11:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167416433 (Comments: 2) | Meagan B (Discussed changesets: 7) | confirmed, should be 'ref' not 'name' commented 2025-06-16 14:08:53 UTC by Meagan B ♦8 |
| 164862225 (Comments: 3) | theophrastos (Discussed changesets: 43) | ok, danke für die schnelle Antwort. Ich kenne die Diskussion noch nicht, aber hört sich für leider auch nicht schlüssig an. Ein paar Gegenargumente: - highway=primary_link wird im Gegensatz zu highway=residential ü... commented 2025-06-16 14:01:27 UTC by redd ♦383 |
| 167665856 (Comments: 1) | ncalhoon (Discussed changesets: 1) | hey there! thanks for adding local info to the map! just FYI: in OSM, we spell out all parts of a roadway, like "Lane". happy mapping! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2025-06-16 13:59:51 UTC by jcarlson ♦111 |
| 167693609 (Comments: 4) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 166) | :)) commented 2025-06-16 13:52:21 UTC by Shamazu ♦12 |
| 167657498 (Comments: 1) | Stephen_Co_Antrim (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19258695. This is the replacement for the tag boundary[10]=Lacroagh. commented 2025-06-16 13:51:12 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167695571 (Comments: 1) | Reviliuspb (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-06-16 13:50:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167670908 (Comments: 2) | Anton Cheloshkin (Discussed changesets: 4) | It's done all over the country? https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Anton%20Cheloshkin/history?after=167670908#map=10/52.1122/5.2127 commented 2025-06-16 13:45:09 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167669222 (Comments: 3) | yarnlion (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nope not a problem, just thought they might be a mistake. Thanks for adding buildings! commented 2025-06-16 13:31:35 UTC by iandees ♦723 |
| 64620022 (Comments: 1) | Ijon_Tichy (Discussed changesets: 13) | highway=residential commented 2025-06-16 13:30:43 UTC by Marles77 ♦1 |
| 165152327 (Comments: 2) | Pēteris Caune (Discussed changesets: 2) | Paldies, jā, tā būs precīzāk. Es liku "forest" ar domu, ka tas ir cilvēku veidots, nevis savā vaļā audzis mežs, bet pant_nursery atbilst labāk. commented 2025-06-16 13:17:42 UTC by Pēteris Caune ♦3 |
 | 167684552 (Comments: 1) | Brata Yudha (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I commented with a standard message how your mappings are. Here, you can see the adjustments I made on a number of mapped buildings. Mostly. Collected multiple buildings and wrongly mapped high buildings. https://overpass-api.de/a... commented 2025-06-16 13:14:54 UTC by Frans S ♦9,629 |
| 167567048 (Comments: 2) | gwselke (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, danke für den Hinweis zu Best Practice! commented 2025-06-16 13:11:04 UTC by gwselke ♦2 |
| 164852218 (Comments: 1) | Vaishali Patil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Vaishali Patil Thank you for mapping! I have added highway connectivity in (21.8021117, 88.2820829),way 808300101. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-06-16 13:06:28 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦4 |
| 134420370 (Comments: 3) | WaWei (Discussed changesets: 23) | Danke, traffic_sign könnte man noch setzen. commented 2025-06-16 13:05:28 UTC by wolfbert ♦100 |
| 167684146 (Comments: 1) | Brata Yudha (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (se... commented 2025-06-16 13:02:20 UTC by Frans S ♦9,629 |
 | 165867412 (Comments: 1) | hermann106 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi hermann106, thank You for your contribution. I restored couple of buildings removed by you while working on Fix Intersecting Building challenge. Additionally, I performed the edits in all the tasks marked by you as Fixed without any edits done. Be... commented 2025-06-16 12:58:58 UTC by BR_pebble ♦97 |
| 122244957 (Comments: 3) | Tom Delmas (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour Tom, Merci pour ton retour et la modification ! Oui j'ai vu que tes photos Panoramax étaient utilisées pour documenter et c'est vraiment nickel. Et j'utilise les filtres de la visionneuse pour m'aider &... commented 2025-06-16 12:57:25 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,135 |
| 164998172 (Comments: 1) | Abdul-Nayar Rabiatu Sungumu (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Abdul-Nayar Rabiatu Sungumu I have fixed validation error Self crossing ways for building way 1353789012. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-06-16 12:53:45 UTC by Sammamish ♦4 |
| 167690735 (Comments: 1) | ompatekar (Discussed changesets: 13) | Can't you read my previous comment? Stop this disruption! commented 2025-06-16 12:40:28 UTC by Vis_M ♦15 |
| 167664811 (Comments: 2) | RandomLipeño (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Thanks! I'm very motivated to keep improving the mapping quality (though survey or aerial) of my city :D commented 2025-06-16 12:27:48 UTC by RandomLipeño ♦3 |
| 167669338 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3820) | Wiederhergestellt in 167690977, um der Community Gelegenheit zu geben, die Edits genauer zu untersuchen. commented 2025-06-16 12:21:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,413 |
| 162990157 (Comments: 1) | Ji Li (Discussed changesets: 3) | This was already mapped [here](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12512826096) in the correct location. I'll move the non-duplicated tags over and delete this node. commented 2025-06-16 12:18:08 UTC by Nate Wessel ♦59 |
 | 167530176 (Comments: 1) | Maeva974 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Re :) pour la casse d'écriture des noms https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Respectez_les_conventions_d'%C3%A9criture_pour_l'attribut_name Bonne carto commented 2025-06-16 12:08:18 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,244 |
| 167676940 (Comments: 1) | Maeva974 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour Maeva974 ! merci pour ces contributions ! Pour le nom "Cabinet médecin" cela ressemble plutôt à une description. Le nom doit vraiment être spécifique https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki... commented 2025-06-16 12:06:44 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,244 |
| 167689941 (Comments: 2) | joris990 (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted by changeset #167690543 Geef concreet aan wat je doet en doe dat niet in één changeset in heel Tilburg. Waarom verwijder je adresnodes? Graag reactie mvg eggie commented 2025-06-16 12:02:39 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167655981 (Comments: 2) | Benj35230 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, je suis désolé pour cette erreur de ma part, je pensais bien faire en voulant corriger les erreurs. J'ai normalement remis comme à l'origine. N'hesiter pas à me dire si j'ai oublié de le... commented 2025-06-16 12:02:06 UTC by Benj35230 ♦1 |
| 167653699 (Comments: 3) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 15) | I think the POI is in the right place. It was probably the door you saw — it’s a gig bar which is only open in the evenings, so unless you were surveying then it won’t have been obvious. Marked as open again in https://www.op... commented 2025-06-16 11:53:27 UTC by gurglypipe ♦862 |
| 167224765 (Comments: 2) | Kilencfarku Macska (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sajnos nem egyértelmű. E-közműn Kodály, Lovas és Hóman u. is szerepel körülötte. A helyszínen az íves oldalon Huszár u. van kitéve táblán. Ha arra já... commented 2025-06-16 11:41:23 UTC by Kilencfarku Macska ♦3 |
| 167685957 (Comments: 2) | Klenje (Discussed changesets: 4) | yep, I forgot to split it, sorry about that commented 2025-06-16 11:39:22 UTC by Klenje ♦4 |
| 167672550 (Comments: 2) | schilling5628 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Moin, es kann wohl möglich sein, dass die Route schneller ist, da es auf der Ochtruper Straße/Mühlentor einen kurzen 30er-Abschnitt wegen der angrenzenden Schule gibt. Ich schriebe gerade übers Handy, schaue mir das heut Abend al... commented 2025-06-16 10:52:46 UTC by schilling5628 ♦2 |
| 167687298 (Comments: 1) | Cristoffs (Discussed changesets: 119) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12919054925 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-06-16 10:51:20 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 166701131 (Comments: 5) | Klavsse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Burvīgi, liels paldies par precizējumu un kartes uzlabojumiem. commented 2025-06-16 10:41:11 UTC by richlv ♦384 |
| 167678180 (Comments: 2) | Mark-x (Discussed changesets: 1) | It was already reverted by another user: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167684389 commented 2025-06-16 10:40:24 UTC by Strubbl ♦545 |
| 167686704 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 57) | Nie ruszałem Modlińskiej 6D, bo sytuacja jest niejasna - zrobiłem notkę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4808368 commented 2025-06-16 10:35:23 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 167684348 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 512) | Słusznie i prawidłowo. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167684348 commented 2025-06-16 10:09:48 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦424 |
| 167665766 (Comments: 1) | AnaVrbica (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverting an accidental node creation #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167685384 commented 2025-06-16 09:57:51 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦10 |
| 167664216 (Comments: 3) | Pauline020 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik zie dat je nog geen welkomst hebt ontvangen van de Dutch OSM Community.. Bij deze alsnog ... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM... commented 2025-06-16 09:49:33 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167505062 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 29) | Reverted because no reliable source was found #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167684916 commented 2025-06-16 09:46:58 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦10 |
| 167474087 (Comments: 1) | Pauline020 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Pauline... Het stukjes pad zate niet aan elkaar. Wel vast aan de landuse. Dat routeert niet. Ik heb het hersteld. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-16 09:41:38 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167609161 (Comments: 3) | sundew (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hallo OpenStreetBoy! Das ist nicht ganz richtig, was du schreibst. Und über das PTV2-Schema wurde schon sicher ein Jahrzehnt lang heftigst diskutiert. Ein Kompromiss findet sich im wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:publi... commented 2025-06-16 09:41:05 UTC by sundew ♦73 |
| 167684473 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 373) | https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/355_all.osm.zip; https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/missing/355.geojson commented 2025-06-16 09:35:48 UTC by habi ♦1,833 |
| 167684329 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 373) | https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/355_all.osm.zip; https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/missing/355.geojson commented 2025-06-16 09:35:46 UTC by habi ♦1,833 |
| 167642648 (Comments: 4) | Stratula (Discussed changesets: 7) | Вы меня убедили. Учту в дальнейшем. commented 2025-06-16 09:34:23 UTC by Stratula ♦14 |
| 166917640 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia! Átállítottál ezzel a módosításcsomaggal egy utat kerékpárútnak, de ez nem tükrözi a valóságot, és problémákat fog okozni a... commented 2025-06-16 09:29:58 UTC by leveskockaa ♦61 |
| 167684006 (Comments: 1) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 41) | La Zaida* commented 2025-06-16 09:25:07 UTC by Robot8A ♦67 |
| 167605344 (Comments: 4) | PandaDEV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Super, danke! commented 2025-06-16 09:06:55 UTC by Lirum Larum ♦8 |
| 167682948 (Comments: 1) | kotkirobiamrr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-06-16 09:00:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167660656 (Comments: 2) | KX675 (Discussed changesets: 21) | 2. Those `building=` should be connected with each other, not left alone close by commented 2025-06-16 08:58:57 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,532 |
| 167682108 (Comments: 1) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 41) | #InundaciónAguasvivas #OsmEs commented 2025-06-16 08:55:37 UTC by Robot8A ♦67 |
| 167680127 (Comments: 1) | Andreas Willadsen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correct tagging: highway=construction construction=cycleway commented 2025-06-16 08:54:20 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,640 |
| 167466329 (Comments: 4) | anastasia_ (Discussed changesets: 44) | да, верно, спасибо большое! поправила commented 2025-06-16 08:52:37 UTC by anastasia_ ♦38 |
| 167163958 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia! Átállítottál ezzel a módosításcsomaggal egy utat kerékpárútnak, de ez nem tükrözi a valóságot, és problémákat fog okozni a... commented 2025-06-16 08:46:58 UTC by leveskockaa ♦61 |
| 108713223 (Comments: 3) | rodolfovargas (Discussed changesets: 76) | All that data was a data import, not consulted neither agree with the local community. If you are able, please remove from the database all the wrong data in these or similar Changesets. Thanks and Best Regards... commented 2025-06-16 08:45:44 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,193 |
| 167174568 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia! Átállítottál ezzel a módosításcsomaggal két utcát is kerékpárútnak, de ez nem tükrözi a valóságot, és problém&aacut... commented 2025-06-16 08:36:18 UTC by leveskockaa ♦61 |
| 167654034 (Comments: 1) | ioniulisnâ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Nu mai adauga drumuri si autostrazi care inca nu sunt finalizate si date in lucru. !!! commented 2025-06-16 08:33:33 UTC by rarad74 ♦272 |
 | 167556046 (Comments: 1) | AguilaBJP24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dreligious_administration. Also please use (british) English for the keys. commented 2025-06-16 08:22:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167670160 (Comments: 1) | jpennycook (Discussed changesets: 108) | StreetComplete, whyyy did you packed such a differently located nodes in such a big, single bundle. commented 2025-06-16 08:03:42 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 167680130 (Comments: 1) | alphaagencyvn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167680499 commented 2025-06-16 08:00:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦978 |
| 167525411 (Comments: 6) | Trailguru100 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Noch ein kleines Detail, weil du Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7912019169 verschoben hast. Ich hab das absichtlich genau so eingetragen. Wenn man vor den Latschen steht, denkt man, hier gibt es keinen Weg. Man muss sich tatsächlich... commented 2025-06-16 07:57:47 UTC by syncronic ♦32 |
| 167598328 (Comments: 1) | La Palme (Discussed changesets: 5) | bonjour j'ai l'impression qu'ici le nom est incomplet... ? Comment se nomme cette zone ? "Zone industrielle des 2 Pins" ? "Zone artisanale des 2 Pins" ?... commented 2025-06-16 07:57:07 UTC by Patchanka ♦381 |
| 167598233 (Comments: 1) | La Palme (Discussed changesets: 5) | bonjour comme déjà indiqué par @blef, les émojis n'ont pas leur place dans les tags OSM ! Je comprends que vous essayez de faire de la symbologie avec, cela s'appelle taguer pour le rendu et c'est une... commented 2025-06-16 07:55:10 UTC by Patchanka ♦381 |
| 167583790 (Comments: 1) | Lokalfuerst (Discussed changesets: 91) | Hallo Lokalfuerst, steht bei Way 35818676 wirklich ein Verkehrszeichen 237? Nur dann ist highway=cycleway korrekt. Bei Way 145495926 stimmt das Tagging auch noch nicht. Zum richtigen Tagging siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... commented 2025-06-16 07:50:18 UTC by martinst ♦317 |
| 162915432 (Comments: 2) | tuan_gsm (Discussed changesets: 12) | chắc là quên edit chỗ đó commented 2025-06-16 07:38:57 UTC by tuan_gsm ♦14 |
| 167388234 (Comments: 4) | JürgenPeters (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Jürgen, die Ergänzung der Hausnummer 64/64a kam von dir, in diesem Changeset hier. Schau dir mal die Versionen 1, 2 und 3 hier an: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254571358/history Da wird es klar. <... commented 2025-06-16 07:32:31 UTC by limes11 ♦877 |
 | 167512896 (Comments: 2) | HR440 (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted commented 2025-06-16 07:31:32 UTC by nyampire ♦190 |
| 167272163 (Comments: 2) | Глеб (Discussed changesets: 51) | Вернул commented 2025-06-16 07:28:30 UTC by Глеб ♦134 |
| 167540350 (Comments: 5) | JürgenPeters (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo JürgenPeters, nein, die Nutzung wird nicht durch den osm-Eintrag legitimiert. Wenn Nutzer einer Drittapp dies behaupten, sind sie schlicht im unrecht. Genau zu diesem Zweck gibt es access-tags. Und vernünftige Drittapps werten ... commented 2025-06-16 07:27:51 UTC by limes11 ♦877 |
| 167658416 (Comments: 3) | sw1481 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the clarification! You can make it easier for others if you give a hint about things like this in the changeset comment ("mobile home park shut down c. 2010" or so) in the future. Happy mapping! commented 2025-06-16 07:27:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,413 |
| 167146685 (Comments: 2) | Глеб (Discussed changesets: 51) | Вернул commented 2025-06-16 07:26:07 UTC by Глеб ♦134 |
| 167635024 (Comments: 1) | HOM420 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, greens shouldn't be mapped inside of fairway/rough ways, the fairway/rough should be mapped as a multipolygon, with anything inside of it marked as an inner of that multipolygon. How this is currently mapped says that the green is also the r... commented 2025-06-16 07:25:44 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167107471 (Comments: 2) | Глеб (Discussed changesets: 51) | Вернул. commented 2025-06-16 07:24:48 UTC by Глеб ♦134 |
| 167645461 (Comments: 1) | iksvd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Qualsiasi cosa tu abbia fatto qui, certamente la stazione ferroviaria sembra avere bisogno di essere completamente rifatta. Attualmente il tetto della stazione ha una self-intersection, ma la forma generale è buona per il cestino dei ... commented 2025-06-16 07:24:45 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,431 |
| 167671269 (Comments: 1) | Yougs68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear Yougs68, the "changeset comment" is an important part of quality control in OSM. When someone deletes a lot of things, like you did here, we look at the changeset comment for a justification - why were these things deleted, did they no... commented 2025-06-16 07:24:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,413 |
| 167511490 (Comments: 1) | Trailguru100 (Discussed changesets: 9) | das ist nicht "abandoned". Das ist trail_visibility=horrible. Da gehen Leute lang, man sieht Spuren und Markierungen. commented 2025-06-16 07:23:42 UTC by syncronic ♦32 |
| 152827461 (Comments: 2) | b-holdet (Discussed changesets: 66) | Jeg tror at navnet Amisøen er officielt nok, da den ligger opad Amfivej, mens det andet er lokalt. Er der så ikke bare at give den: loc_name=Surfersøen commented 2025-06-16 07:22:28 UTC by b-holdet ♦313 |
| 167145099 (Comments: 1) | HOM420 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, is there actually a railway buffer stop on the edge of a bunker here? commented 2025-06-16 07:21:06 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167558279 (Comments: 3) | digistrorf (Discussed changesets: 3) | If it's the same object and they were mapped as a node before and are remaining a node, it's best practice to move the node, not delete and recreate. This was done for most of the existing campsites that have been updated. Thanks for... commented 2025-06-16 07:09:52 UTC by fortera_au ♦485 |
| 167511072 (Comments: 3) | Trailguru100 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Da war ein Baum über den Weg gefallen und der wurde dann nach einiger Zeit durchgesägt. Das habe ich auch so vermerkt. Ansonsten ist der Steig durchgehend frei, man muss sich nirgendwo durch Latschen zwängen, d.h. die Latschen werden w... commented 2025-06-16 07:05:28 UTC by syncronic ♦32 |
| 167572115 (Comments: 1) | John Stanworth (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hello, please be more careful with your edits. Apparently you had offset a section of Buxton Road far past its actual location. commented 2025-06-16 06:51:12 UTC by Aethonatic ♦9 |
| 167598764 (Comments: 2) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 229) | Alright, nevermind. Seems like your edit is an attempt at fixing the issue I've described which was apparently caused by previous edits. Sorry, I'll revert my revert. commented 2025-06-16 06:46:56 UTC by Aethonatic ♦9 |
| 167668154 (Comments: 1) | PabloArgE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por editar, por favor añade comentarios en los conjuntos de cambios para facilitar a otros compañeros las revisiones, en este changeset se han movido un par de picos, por ejemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/72... commented 2025-06-16 06:46:43 UTC by aTarom ♦765 |
| 167677739 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 373) | Nö, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806484 erledigt :) commented 2025-06-16 06:40:46 UTC by habi ♦1,833 |
| 167677646 (Comments: 1) | lumbchu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Additionally moved the location of the building commented 2025-06-16 06:37:01 UTC by lumbchu ♦1 |
| 167427138 (Comments: 2) | BRD-ZDP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dziękuję za wiadomość, poprawione. commented 2025-06-16 06:34:49 UTC by BRD-ZDP ♦2 |
| 53983104 (Comments: 2) | sarxos (Discussed changesets: 8) | When I was there shortly before making the map changes, one could easily trace the railway through the forest. There are traces of embankments and depressions where rails and railway ties were removed. If someone is lucky, they might even come across... commented 2025-06-16 06:22:58 UTC by sarxos ♦11 |
| 167661471 (Comments: 1) | Skabrera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ostras, has eliminado los restos de las paredes de Sant Adjutori? Las medí con precisión centimétrica hace tres años, ya no existen los restos o me equivoque en alguna medida? Saludos commented 2025-06-16 06:19:51 UTC by aTarom ♦765 |
| 159175488 (Comments: 1) | aqofjhsdlgjm (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您好： 你能夠解釋為何改變大甲區的屬性，以及移除台中市公車157線的公車路線屬性？ --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/15... commented 2025-06-16 06:07:21 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,418 |
| 167668079 (Comments: 1) | Viavia1001001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ERRATUM (dans le texte): L'itinéraire de randonnée passe passe par la rive *DROITE* depuis le gîte d'étape le Cabiolon. commented 2025-06-16 05:59:36 UTC by Viavia1001001 ♦1 |
| 167666859 (Comments: 3) | RobHoogland09 (Discussed changesets: 8) | leuk dat mappen maar idd fouten zijn snel gemaakt! Dank voor meekijken. commented 2025-06-16 05:54:04 UTC by RobHoogland09 ♦4 |
| 141633544 (Comments: 1) | Etzharai (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hola, por favor es necesario que corrijas los terrenos que creaste por Trebujena y alrededores. No se deben unir las áreas a las vías de esa forma y tampoco crear terrenos gigantes que engloben diferentes tipos de terrenos y otro... commented 2025-06-16 05:42:42 UTC by kapazao ♦905 |
| 165137348 (Comments: 2) | Pokotoco (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional. commented 2025-06-16 05:41:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦856 |
| 68528238 (Comments: 1) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 56) | I love this changeset so much. commented 2025-06-16 05:39:25 UTC by watmildon ♦242 |
| 167629311 (Comments: 2) | Garnwenshared (Discussed changesets: 1) | There were problems with ways with the same position and gaps in hedges were missing. commented 2025-06-16 05:34:28 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167601752 (Comments: 3) | Hung Tran 9x0 (Discussed changesets: 6) | oki bạn. luôn tham khảo guide của Lyft nhé commented 2025-06-16 05:31:21 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦209 |
| 167562211 (Comments: 2) | MadestCat (Discussed changesets: 21) | Moin! Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ja, das ist ein dummer Copy Paste Fehler. Er wurde zum Glück schon korrigiert. Grüße commented 2025-06-16 05:22:25 UTC by MadestCat ♦11 |
| 166565359 (Comments: 1) | Pierre 21000 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonsoir, Pourquoi avez-vous modifié l'attribut network ? Le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rennes/Transports_en_commun indique que la valeur correcte est FR:STAR. Pouvez-vous corriger ? Merci d'avance Marc commented 2025-06-16 04:58:02 UTC by mga_geo ♦245 |
| 167641261 (Comments: 4) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 318) | OSM stimmt mit der Webseite überein. Nur eins könnte noch verbessert werden: ref=Energie ist zu lang, es sollten max 5 Zeichen sein. commented 2025-06-16 04:45:14 UTC by geozeisig ♦222 |
| 167653528 (Comments: 1) | Kiharu1410 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mình sẽ lùi lại sửa đổi này của bạn vì: (1) Nghị quyết về việc sắp xếp phường chưa có chính thức, (2) Việc lập phường mới diễn ra đồng thời với việc bỏ qu... commented 2025-06-16 04:40:46 UTC by Tommybara ♦82 |
| 167671462 (Comments: 1) | CertifiedPro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. I am reverting this edit because you dragged a sidewalk across the map, and appear to have added your business in a location that differs from your own website. Please do the built-in editor tutorial and take a look at the wiki ( http... commented 2025-06-16 03:45:15 UTC by citrula ♦835 |
| 167673247 (Comments: 1) | olo81 (Discussed changesets: 96) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2284169997 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-06-16 02:40:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 167670220 (Comments: 1) | maximum_stressdynamic_pressure (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, nice job mapping up in Richmond Hill! Just wanted to mention that postal codes of buildings and other points are more commonly tagged as addr:postcode=*. postal_code=* is more commonly used for tagging streets or towns in cases where a wh... commented 2025-06-16 02:19:19 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦320 |
| 32395319 (Comments: 1) | prantolima (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, al observar en Imágenes aéreas de Esri Mundial, en este conjunto de cambios, quedaron quedaron algunas quebradas naturales iniciando en ascenso y luego cruzando un filo para descender por gravedad, que es lo que realmente funciona... commented 2025-06-16 02:16:55 UTC by JLOSM ♦35 |
| 167634682 (Comments: 1) | DLZ2024 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Should have stated that it is located in Novesta Township, MI. not Evergreen. commented 2025-06-16 01:54:27 UTC by DLZ2024 ♦5 |
| 167671265 (Comments: 1) | Magentacoder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Sadleir Street is the correct spelling. I have corrected it. commented 2025-06-16 00:44:45 UTC by nevw ♦1,969 |
| 167671221 (Comments: 1) | Ryan Watern (Discussed changesets: 11) | There was a issue where the polygon was split and not showing on the right side. Issue should be fixed now. commented 2025-06-16 00:08:26 UTC by Ryan Watern ♦4 |
| 167669968 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 57) | W ramach zmiany dodałem też bramy pobliskim obszarom, które miały zmapowane ogrodzenia. commented 2025-06-16 00:06:47 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 167640004 (Comments: 2) | someonex (Discussed changesets: 1) | What happened to Organic Maps? Another strangely big bundle of just a few nodes. commented 2025-06-16 00:01:34 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 152522891 (Comments: 2) | Caleb NHVR (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi Mateusz, I'll aim to have a look into this one. In the meantime, this resource regarding a large upgrade of Pacific Motorway - close to Darhi Milgirr Road, could have suitable information. Cheers. https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-tr... commented 2025-06-15 23:32:16 UTC by Caleb NHVR ♦10 |
| 167545312 (Comments: 1) | Marzena_14 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Witaj! Latarnie dodaje się: 1. Nie do drogi tylko obok (w miejscu ich faktycznego położenia) 2. Nie w ten sposób (zamiast nazwy trzeba dać tag highway=street_lamp). Proszę o poprawę, w przeciwnym razie "latarnie" zo... commented 2025-06-15 23:14:07 UTC by bartgron ♦133 |
| X | 167631970 (Comments: 2) | wvdp (Discussed changesets: 150) | If you have to load a totally different area in JOSM for your changes category, just upload your changes and open a new session. It's not funny if there's such a large bbox across the oceans just because there're US military bases ever... commented 2025-06-15 22:29:41 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦96 |
| 167659641 (Comments: 1) | krauzze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Почему удалили? commented 2025-06-15 22:25:23 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦954 |
| 167641213 (Comments: 1) | piorun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj! Dwie drobne informacje potrzebne w przyszłym mapowaniu: 1. Nie dodajemy punktów POI (sklepów, szkół tańca czy salonów urody) do obrysu budynku. 2. Wszelkie informacje na temat tagowania znajdziesz tutaj:... commented 2025-06-15 22:18:16 UTC by bartgron ♦133 |
| 167616430 (Comments: 1) | Waldhüter (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, dein Kommentar passt nicht zum bearbeiteten Gebiet. Was hat Vöhrenbach in BW mit Floß in der Oberpfalz zu tun? Was haben nicht mehr vorhandene Eisenbahngleise mit Flächennutzung zu tun? Woher stammen die Daten übe... commented 2025-06-15 22:14:43 UTC by Ropino ♦385 |
| 167669412 (Comments: 1) | Valérie Tardif (Discussed changesets: 5) | Comment should have been: adjusted building geometry, placed addresses and entrances, adjusted access restrictions commented 2025-06-15 22:12:58 UTC by Valérie Tardif ♦4 |
| 167667973 (Comments: 1) | Everteal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merde la source c'est pas survey, mais 'complete-tes-commerces'. commented 2025-06-15 21:54:10 UTC by Everteal ♦1 |
| 167667862 (Comments: 1) | Welsh Mullet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just realised the crossing of the a456 by an access road at Nant-hir has actually moved about 250m south west. I do have that on the gps data, I just lazily "un-under construction-ed" the road that was already on the map. Will have to corre... commented 2025-06-15 21:44:08 UTC by Welsh Mullet ♦1 |
| 167647744 (Comments: 2) | Dan Hatton (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oof. In that case I'm going to have to revert a *lot* of my recent changesets. Still, all a good learning experience. (For the rest of this post, I'm kind of thinking out loud - don't feel under any obligation to answer my ann... commented 2025-06-15 21:41:09 UTC by Dan Hatton ♦8 |
| 167633680 (Comments: 2) | Niederpruem (Discussed changesets: 36) | ok, akzeptiert. commented 2025-06-15 21:28:53 UTC by Niederpruem ♦29 |
| 167663057 (Comments: 2) | tisoft_media (Discussed changesets: 2) | Der Fußweg geht über ein privat Grundstück. Bisher war das kein Problem und wurde oft genutzt. Aber die aktuelle Mieterin der Wohnung im Erdgeschoss hat sich beim Hauseigentümer beschwert, dass alle anderen Mieter Balkon/Terrasse... commented 2025-06-15 21:16:26 UTC by tisoft_media ♦1 |
| 167663283 (Comments: 2) | Mid_ream (Discussed changesets: 1) | please don't edit in ukraine AND new zealand in the same changeset commented 2025-06-15 21:05:35 UTC by ilias_ ♦210 |
| 167666808 (Comments: 3) | RobHoogland09 (Discussed changesets: 8) | De tag stond al op een node. commented 2025-06-15 20:59:54 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167667074 (Comments: 3) | RobHoogland09 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wonderlijk... Wegbeheerder heeft een G11 bord (fietspad) en een G7 bord (wandelpad) op de zelfde paal gezet. https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.407547201&lng=4.681098461&z=19 Zou het inderdaad ma... commented 2025-06-15 20:53:53 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167666412 (Comments: 4) | RobHoogland09 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Nou... up to you.. Ik geef alleen maar tips. :) Maar top dat je het oppikt. mapse eggie commented 2025-06-15 20:48:22 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167667328 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …” commented 2025-06-15 20:45:27 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167667125 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …” commented 2025-06-15 20:45:15 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167666630 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …” and also, minus “… – part 2” commented 2025-06-15 20:44:38 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167664868 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …” commented 2025-06-15 20:43:26 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167664307 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …” commented 2025-06-15 20:43:05 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167663933 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …” commented 2025-06-15 20:42:44 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167663566 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 59) | Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …” commented 2025-06-15 20:42:31 UTC by domiden ♦57 |
| 167659860 (Comments: 5) | liamrocker (Discussed changesets: 36) | Alles klar. Dann passts ja auch. commented 2025-06-15 20:39:57 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167651236 (Comments: 2) | Helfer124! (Discussed changesets: 5) | horse=no wieder entfernt, Poller eingetragen und zu highway=path geändert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167667240 commented 2025-06-15 20:38:28 UTC by Bienson ♦291 |
| 167667009 (Comments: 1) | RobHoogland09 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hier is het wel gelukt. Je mag overigens op een highway=path wel foot=yes laten staan en evt bicycle=yes of no taggen. Gr eggie commented 2025-06-15 20:38:27 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167628713 (Comments: 2) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 29) | O dwa zera za dużo haha commented 2025-06-15 20:37:23 UTC by RafaBoski ♦8 |
| 167650783 (Comments: 1) | Helfer124! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167667131 Implizierte Tags müssen nicht hinzugefügt werden. commented 2025-06-15 20:36:24 UTC by Bienson ♦291 |
| 167650993 (Comments: 1) | Helfer124! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167667131 Kein Parkplatz commented 2025-06-15 20:35:32 UTC by Bienson ♦291 |
| 167651082 (Comments: 1) | Helfer124! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167667131 Kein Parkplatz commented 2025-06-15 20:35:29 UTC by Bienson ♦291 |
| 167651161 (Comments: 1) | Helfer124! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167667131 Kein Parkplatz commented 2025-06-15 20:35:25 UTC by Bienson ♦291 |
| 167666149 (Comments: 3) | RobHoogland09 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Oke... rustig aan met aanpassen... Het werkt overigens wel omdat foot=yes de =no zal overrulen, maar we proberen die combinaties te ontmoedigen. Mapse eggie commented 2025-06-15 20:33:19 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167665993 (Comments: 1) | dennis78map (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello dennis78map, CoMaps and OsmAnd use the same OpenStreetMap database, so please don't add new places with both apps in parallel as it results in duplicates. Thanks and best regards map per commented 2025-06-15 20:24:06 UTC by map per ♦1,292 |
| 167663459 (Comments: 1) | RobHoogland09 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Rob.. Je tagt access=no Verboden Toegang. De combinatie access=no met andere accesstags zijn bijna altijd fout. Wie zou hier niet mogen komen.. terwijl je er wel mag fietsen en wandelen? Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?ch... commented 2025-06-15 20:18:33 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167630820 (Comments: 4) | Kecsege (Discussed changesets: 11) | Nem tudom mikor tudok újra arra járni, hogy megnézzem. Ha ezt így hibásnak gondolod, elfogadom. commented 2025-06-15 20:08:42 UTC by Kecsege ♦14 |
| 167651641 (Comments: 3) | Dan Hatton (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Dan OSM derives the relationship from level 10 being inside a level 6 or 8 inside a level 4 up to being inside a level 2 UK. Cheers Phil commented 2025-06-15 20:00:53 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,367 |
| 167650856 (Comments: 5) | Dan Hatton (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Dan I was atlking about your additions to the higher admin boundaries. Reverting does just create a new version. We (the data working group) can redact but we only do that for thing that need tags be not seen. The review requeste... commented 2025-06-15 19:53:24 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,367 |
| 167628430 (Comments: 1) | DAG NGL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Proszę o tworzenie poprawnych nazw zestawów zmian https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-06-15 19:53:16 UTC by zuicz ♦274 |
| 149740776 (Comments: 2) | Tetryk (Discussed changesets: 29) | Usunąłem przystanki, w WTP już ich nie ma, ale jak jest z peronami to nie wiem. commented 2025-06-15 19:51:31 UTC by Tetryk ♦55 |
| 120981080 (Comments: 1) | Hack-o-lantern (Discussed changesets: 13) | FYI, this added building parts (cool) for Regal Road Public School, but didn't include a building so nothing actually rendered. Building parts must live within a building! :) Have fixed this for this building. commented 2025-06-15 19:45:40 UTC by Shrinks99 ♦13 |
| 166462572 (Comments: 2) | solcarlus5 (Discussed changesets: 13) | bilan de la concertation à voir ici : https://caenlamer.fr/concertations/desserte-portuaire commented 2025-06-15 19:34:37 UTC by solcarlus5 ♦2 |
| 160019066 (Comments: 2) | ProximaJanko (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello? commented 2025-06-15 19:14:41 UTC by vmicho ♦72 |
| 167645847 (Comments: 1) | lutzfu (Discussed changesets: 5) | ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-06-15 19:02:54 UTC by Tatfahren ♦268 |
| 167648025 (Comments: 1) | lutzfu (Discussed changesets: 5) | ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-06-15 19:01:03 UTC by Tatfahren ♦268 |
| 167646134 (Comments: 1) | lutzfu (Discussed changesets: 5) | ? commented 2025-06-15 19:00:22 UTC by Tatfahren ♦268 |
| 167663648 (Comments: 1) | PrzemekF (Discussed changesets: 46) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-06-15 18:50:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
 | 166984995 (Comments: 1) | Simsim00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners a... commented 2025-06-15 18:50:53 UTC by martien-176 ♦334 |
| 167663698 (Comments: 1) | Allison P (Discussed changesets: 130) | Trying a new approach where I map all the crossings first, then the sidewalks. I'm hoping it will reduce the time spent switching between continuing different ways. commented 2025-06-15 18:47:10 UTC by Allison P ♦1,134 |
| 167663539 (Comments: 1) | sozius (Discussed changesets: 1) | Position Wegweiser Neckarhälden korrigiert commented 2025-06-15 18:45:03 UTC by sozius ♦1 |
| 120471488 (Comments: 1) | SilverKnight (Discussed changesets: 13) | A EM 511 no distrito de Viseu começa na EN 229 (Antas) e termina na EM 601 (proximidades de Prova). O troço em referência, corresponde à ER 326 commented 2025-06-15 18:17:33 UTC by rui228 ♦30 |
| 154247609 (Comments: 2) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 149) | Poprawiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167662442 Ta edycja była związana wyłącznie z geometrią drogi ale faktycznie wygląda na dwukierunkową dla rowerów. commented 2025-06-15 18:02:39 UTC by Marek-M ♦898 |
| 140667118 (Comments: 1) | adas (Discussed changesets: 68) | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4659215 ? commented 2025-06-15 18:01:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167660858 (Comments: 1) | MrAnderson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Mr Anderson :) thank you for fixing typos in the database. Much appreciated. I'd like to point out, that there are always some slightly annoyed people out there, when the changeset bounding box covers most of the globe. There... commented 2025-06-15 18:00:20 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167661904 (Comments: 1) | RSydes (Discussed changesets: 13) | Minor correction to the changeset summary: actually, it was from the first time I went; the second (the actual last) time, I turned back because the trail became to overgrown commented 2025-06-15 17:53:38 UTC by RSydes ♦17 |
| 141651234 (Comments: 8) | Hikerandy (Discussed changesets: 4) | For the "pathless" marking, one needs to go into the iD editor, click on the object of interest and in "Edit feature" look at the box "Trail Visibility", where one option is "No: pathless, excellent orientation skil... commented 2025-06-15 17:50:02 UTC by Hikerandy ♦3 |
| 165071150 (Comments: 1) | RowerzystaAmator (Discussed changesets: 1) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806176 ? commented 2025-06-15 17:48:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 162261539 (Comments: 3) | kuba743 (Discussed changesets: 25) | service jest poprawne tylko wtedy gdy nie jest budowana kontynuacja, a w tym przypadku jest budowana commented 2025-06-15 17:48:02 UTC by puchaczowsky ♦138 |
| 126229926 (Comments: 2) | micheleOSM3 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ok, se per te segni sono buoni, togli pure il disused da disused:osmc:symbol, tuttavia è un sentiero dismesso dal CAI, pertanto disused:operator dovrebbe rimanere. Ciao e buon mapping. commented 2025-06-15 17:37:59 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦99 |
| 167647121 (Comments: 5) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 512) | akurat w ogóle nie znam sytuacji w tej okolicy, a jest możliwość, że ta edycja była poprawna. po prostu musisz zrobić propozycję na forum i przedstawić argumenty i być może edycja zostanie wdrożona. tymi multikontami nic nie zdział... commented 2025-06-15 17:24:43 UTC by pavvv ♦467 |
| 167369719 (Comments: 4) | LovelyPL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dzięki za tak szczegółowy komentarz. Akurat ta droga to jest jakaś droga między polami - dodatkowo zarośnięta, widać, że tam nawet traktory ostatnio nie jeżdżą, choć pewnie by przejechały - jak to traktory :) Zdjęcia nie mam.... commented 2025-06-15 17:15:06 UTC by LovelyPL ♦2 |
| 167631269 (Comments: 1) | net123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте, проверьте пожалуйста названия улиц в СНТ Березка-2, по данным ФИАС там названия идут цифрами (1-я улица, 2-я улица, …). commented 2025-06-15 17:07:07 UTC by Grass-snake ♦220 |
| 167652547 (Comments: 1) | Fideles Mercadinho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fideles Mercadinho, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https:... commented 2025-06-15 17:05:01 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 167658768 (Comments: 1) | seiko2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Nach gestriger Begehung commented 2025-06-15 16:56:20 UTC by seiko2 ♦5 |
| 167631850 (Comments: 3) | Drahtochse (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke dir :) commented 2025-06-15 16:55:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167657671 (Comments: 1) | Bryan Sabbag (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Please add an address only on the main building. commented 2025-06-15 16:35:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167588803 (Comments: 4) | m_zahariev (Discussed changesets: 11) | Отговорих ти на твоето съобщение в темата за А1 в skyscraper, там съм сложил цитат от документа на МОСВ commented 2025-06-15 16:29:51 UTC by m_zahariev ♦9 |
| 167601438 (Comments: 2) | FUZZY_42 (Discussed changesets: 58) | На взгляд по высоте будет где-то 4 этажа. commented 2025-06-15 16:17:17 UTC by FUZZY_42 ♦20 |
 | 167575385 (Comments: 8) | Erelen (Discussed changesets: 21) | Also, you completely ignored sign for combined cycle- and footway (here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.253682389352&lng=19.841365636634&z=17&pKey=425667063493363&focus=photo&x=0.2795284038444516&y=0.5179497222696728&am... commented 2025-06-15 16:15:52 UTC by Srdjan023 ♦39 |
| 159063656 (Comments: 3) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Super, danke :-) commented 2025-06-15 16:09:08 UTC by jodd ♦120 |
| 162256918 (Comments: 1) | VRS-Auskunft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Guten Abend, mir ist aufgefallen, dass ihr am Mittelbahnsteig aus ref=1;2 ref=1;2;3 gemacht habt. Was ist der Grund dafür? viele Grüße Eifelkobold commented 2025-06-15 16:07:56 UTC by Eifelkobold! ♦79 |
| 143922606 (Comments: 1) | Рыженко Леонид Игоревич (Discussed changesets: 18) | я бы наверное track оставил, основной маршрут через 3рутки, через бурлацкое ездят меньше, дорога используется реже и в основном лесовозами commented 2025-06-15 16:00:53 UTC by skadi ♦8 |
| 102249477 (Comments: 2) | Fabian_P (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich holz das dann mal ab :) bitte Abbiegebeschränkungen nur da setzen, wo sie wirklich nötig sind. commented 2025-06-15 15:53:00 UTC by FraukeLeo ♦280 |
| 167581854 (Comments: 1) | sarukwa (Discussed changesets: 6) | I now realise that the access=destination tags should be changed to motor_vehicle=destination, because foot and bicycle through traffic is allowed. I will do this later. commented 2025-06-15 15:45:05 UTC by sarukwa ♦9 |
| 167464499 (Comments: 2) | Joseph Michael Ware (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the heads-up! I'll update everything I've changed to match the naming convention. commented 2025-06-15 15:43:32 UTC by Joseph Michael Ware ♦1 |
| 167576739 (Comments: 3) | Carterthefarter7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I went ahead and changed it from a power line to a track. I also renamed Seaview Drive NW to Northwest Seaview Drive to match what the county has. Let me know if that is wrong. commented 2025-06-15 15:33:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,205 |
| 167644335 (Comments: 4) | stefvanschie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi.. denk het ook. Mapse.. eggie commented 2025-06-15 15:33:33 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167600107 (Comments: 6) | Rainer Dorsch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you tell which routers work properly with the way you suggest? commented 2025-06-15 15:30:47 UTC by Rainer Dorsch ♦2 |
| 167566335 (Comments: 1) | eyw27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, can you comment why you upgraded this section of road? commented 2025-06-15 15:30:34 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦320 |
| 165629291 (Comments: 4) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 17) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Набережные_Челны commented 2025-06-15 15:22:05 UTC by CometSeeker ♦21 |
| 167655690 (Comments: 1) | deneb48 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, pour info cette soumission de changements fait suite à la discussion https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/process-de-passage-a-30km-h-sur-une-commune/7516/13?u=deneb48 Je me suis limité ici au passage à maxspeed=30 p... commented 2025-06-15 15:22:05 UTC by deneb48 ♦5 |
| 167652271 (Comments: 1) | MapperCat (Discussed changesets: 2) | per a noms locals no oficials, hi ha el tag loc_name --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167652271 commented 2025-06-15 15:00:40 UTC by blacx ♦78 |
| 143677186 (Comments: 1) | waseempasha (Discussed changesets: 6) | How are these residential roads? This is pure disruption from OLA editors who keep nonsensically reverting all these community edits on roads commented 2025-06-15 14:59:07 UTC by Vis_M ♦15 |
| 167517938 (Comments: 3) | user_7031 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, sieht gut aus, danke dir. Viele Grüße commented 2025-06-15 14:47:31 UTC by rempshaener ♦693 |
| 167555157 (Comments: 1) | Phookle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure that this way is surface=asphalt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109964012 When tagging SoCal from aerial imagery, I specifically used the tag surface=paved when the road surface seemed to differ from nearby asphalt road... commented 2025-06-15 14:32:31 UTC by CRCulver ♦189 |
| 167536040 (Comments: 2) | Fabe56 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi, I'm not sure about this! On the west side of Sherbrooke Street, the infrastructure not suggest any crossing possibility (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=772056961680333&focus=photo&lat=45.5497828&lng=-73.5549653&z=17&... commented 2025-06-15 14:20:58 UTC by Fabe56 ♦43 |
| 161830466 (Comments: 1) | ThéoPMP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour ThéoPMP, ce magasin Auchan est fermé depuis un moment. Il a donc été mis en disused:shop=supermarket l'auchan. Tu as remis shop=supermarket ce qui ne me semble pas correct. Par exemple, le navigateur Os... commented 2025-06-15 13:54:23 UTC by rainerU ♦274 |
| 167651500 (Comments: 1) | twardzik (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę. |
| 167555353 (Comments: 1) | Hasini_Yarru (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, thanks for mapping. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. One can get fooled b... commented 2025-06-15 13:33:37 UTC by martien-176 ♦334 |
| 167651559 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 512) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4801316 commented 2025-06-15 13:31:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167630748 (Comments: 1) | Wlad32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Чому ви позначили територію як будівля? Виправте це. А також не потрібно мапити кожну присадибну ділянку окремим полігоном. commented 2025-06-15 13:20:19 UTC by michael_ua ♦209 |
| 167636554 (Comments: 1) | Bienenmaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wenn das ein Verkaufsautomat ist muss das wie folgt gemappt werden. amenity=vending_machine vending=honey Damit man das passend bezahlen kann noch zum Beispiel payment:coins=yes Mehr Details dazu im Wiki z.B. auch welche M&uum... commented 2025-06-15 13:18:30 UTC by 5R-MFT ♦75 |
| 167582757 (Comments: 1) | Ayati (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners a... commented 2025-06-15 13:18:13 UTC by martien-176 ♦334 |
| 167630613 (Comments: 1) | Wlad32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you add huge water rectangle? I reverted this changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167651012 commented 2025-06-15 13:17:43 UTC by michael_ua ♦209 |
| 167605427 (Comments: 1) | Siem_Hw (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator. --- #REVIEW... commented 2025-06-15 13:12:11 UTC by martien-176 ♦334 |
| 167609830 (Comments: 1) | AndrzejIT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Przesunąłeś węzły dróg, ścieżek i landuse'ów przez co przecinały ulice/budynki i inne obiekty. Sprawdzaj przed wysłaniem zmian, ostrzeżenia edytora. commented 2025-06-15 13:07:16 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,043 |
| 167611207 (Comments: 1) | Aachal312 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator. --- #REVIEW... commented 2025-06-15 13:05:15 UTC by martien-176 ♦334 |
| 167612035 (Comments: 1) | Izza Majeed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. Accurate building fo... commented 2025-06-15 13:02:35 UTC by martien-176 ♦334 |
| 164724194 (Comments: 1) | Marcel Staufenberg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gude Marcel :) was genau hast du denn an dieser Stelle erfasst? Ist hier vielleicht ein unterirdischer Wasserspeicher mit 300hl Volumen und einem Storz A Anschluss für die Feuerwehr? Guck mal hier: https://wiki.openstree... commented 2025-06-15 13:00:52 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,364 |
| 167441092 (Comments: 7) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 21) | Yes, that makes sense although that relation needs editing. NCN61 ends officially at Rye House, not Hoddesdon. I'll have a go sorting that. Off to ride the route tomorrow. commented 2025-06-15 13:00:18 UTC by Adam Edwards ♦13 |
| 167634293 (Comments: 1) | Ellie Moon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding addresses to these schools! Something to consider for future changes: In OSM we usually prefer to put addresses on specific buildings or points inside buildings, since multiple buildings on a school campus can have different address... commented 2025-06-15 12:51:37 UTC by iandees ♦723 |
| 127378847 (Comments: 2) | Julizzi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Georg, ich habe heute zufälligerweise OpenStreetMap geöffnet und deinen Kommentar gesehen. Wie du wahrscheinlich anhand meines Profils gesehen hast, bin ich absolut kein Experte und habe es daher so "Simpel" gema... commented 2025-06-15 12:43:45 UTC by Julizzi ♦1 |
| 167649272 (Comments: 1) | XPromus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Do note that, due to a construction site, some of the footpaths are not usable at the moment and are not the usual surface, but they should return to their usual state after the construction work is finished. commented 2025-06-15 12:43:24 UTC by XPromus ♦1 |
| 167479510 (Comments: 1) | dikkeknodel (Discussed changesets: 35) | Kun je bij informele paden zoals je zandpaadje ook informal=yes toevoegen? commented 2025-06-15 12:37:40 UTC by Famlam ♦305 |
| 167639585 (Comments: 3) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 15) | Yup joules has expended. The way I walked I didn't spot the bit round the corner. Did wonder about the odd shaped shop on my next lap. commented 2025-06-15 12:35:21 UTC by SmithyScotland ♦11 |
| 167215203 (Comments: 1) | dikkeknodel (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi dikkeknodel, kun je even kijken naar way 752307335? Er zit nu een vacuum tussen het water en dit bosje en dat was wrs niet je intentie commented 2025-06-15 12:34:11 UTC by Famlam ♦305 |
| 167611699 (Comments: 1) | diodaix (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please check my correction of your three ways with NAMOBJ only. See https://www.osm.org/changeset/167649002 commented 2025-06-15 12:31:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167633476 (Comments: 1) | dom-666 (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hello! Please have a llok on https://www.osm.org/way=291836801. What is the mean of the tag space = void? commented 2025-06-15 12:04:53 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167646613 (Comments: 2) | G_P_J (Discussed changesets: 315) | Poprawione. commented 2025-06-15 12:04:31 UTC by G_P_J ♦387 |
| 162168937 (Comments: 3) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 318) | Verstehe. Trotzdem danke für's rückgängig machen. commented 2025-06-15 12:04:30 UTC by gs3§zba ♦54 |
| 167647143 (Comments: 1) | Oguz015111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bu değişiklikte Google Maps kaynak gösterilerek veri eklendiği görülmektedir. Telif hakkı nedeniyle bu kaynak OpenStreetMap’te kullanılamaz. Bu nedenle ilgili değişiklik geri alınmıştır. Lütfen yalnızca OSM kural... commented 2025-06-15 11:49:43 UTC by Eren00 ♦7 |
| 167610614 (Comments: 2) | user2137 (Discussed changesets: 1) | wycofane jako edycja drogi wysokiej klasy (zmiana kategorii) bez uprzedniej dyskusji, do zrobienia na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167647121 commented 2025-06-15 11:42:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167636825 (Comments: 1) | ctd11w (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bing Maps Aerial це дуже застарілі знімки, використовуйте Esri commented 2025-06-15 11:20:05 UTC by kamasytrix ♦23 |
| 167637075 (Comments: 1) | ctd11w (Discussed changesets: 2) | Добрий день, не потрібно кожну зміну вносити окремим редагування якщо ви редагуєте якийсь невеликий *квартал*, також житлова зона робить... commented 2025-06-15 11:14:48 UTC by kamasytrix ♦23 |
| 162653071 (Comments: 3) | Zentbeer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Graag gedaan! Sowieso leuk om een mede-mapper in de buurt (neem ik aan iig - ik woon in Schothorst-zuid) te zien :-) commented 2025-06-15 11:08:51 UTC by Matthijs Kooijman ♦9 |
| 167627245 (Comments: 1) | metti69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12915442570. What is the mean of آدرس = بعثت ۴ اینستاگرام = https://www.instagram.com/salamatgym ساعات فعالیت = 07-22 شهر = سبزوار م... commented 2025-06-15 11:07:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167604826 (Comments: 1) | 준오헤어 마곡역점 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12914138796. What is the mean of junohair = juno 미용실 = 준오헤어 ? Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhairdresser#Hair_and_beauty_sa... commented 2025-06-15 11:04:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,313 |
| 167645450 (Comments: 1) | Anastasiia_Pytsko (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli ... commented 2025-06-15 11:00:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 112035895 (Comments: 3) | wielandb (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ah, das macht Sinn. Danke fürs Nachschauen! commented 2025-06-15 10:53:12 UTC by burrscurr ♦75 |
| 31373533 (Comments: 1) | R0bst3r (Discussed changesets: 69) | Guten Tag, ist der Baum nun eine Eiche oder ein Kastanie? commented 2025-06-15 10:41:02 UTC by Josef73 ♦272 |
| 167454481 (Comments: 1) | Marwadohi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. There are a few issue though. 1. Buildings sharing nodes with neighboring buildings. Please avoid this, if buildings need to be adjusted or improved later ... commented 2025-06-15 10:39:27 UTC by martien-176 ♦334 |
| 167643779 (Comments: 1) | Editor-osm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. building=industrial teruggezet. e... commented 2025-06-15 10:38:39 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167533661 (Comments: 1) | c_cipollini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi c_cipollini, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea... commented 2025-06-15 10:37:43 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
 | 167588489 (Comments: 1) | DougCripto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi DougCripto, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.... commented 2025-06-15 10:36:55 UTC by Comino ♦58 |
| 167541509 (Comments: 2) | lelek_anabolek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вот примерно вот так я это вижу https://sadrium.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/heather-and-sheep-700x519.jpg commented 2025-06-15 10:12:52 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦14 |
| 167619744 (Comments: 1) | elesmod (Discussed changesets: 3) | U+201E „, U+201D ”, poza tym nie stosujemy nazw opisowych — jeśli jest shop=bakery, to „sklep z pieczywem” jest zbędne, wystarczy name=Bogacki (ewentualnie z cudzysłowami jeśli występują na szyldzie)... commented 2025-06-15 10:12:28 UTC by gscscnd ♦998 |
| 167620485 (Comments: 1) | elesmod (Discussed changesets: 3) | building=retail jest nieaktualne? commented 2025-06-15 10:09:11 UTC by gscscnd ♦998 |
| 167622812 (Comments: 1) | elesmod (Discussed changesets: 3) | Jeśli nie ma tam jawnych zakazów jazdy rowerem lub wierzchem, to domyślnie lepszym tagiem jest highway=path. commented 2025-06-15 10:08:30 UTC by gscscnd ♦998 |
| 167440885 (Comments: 1) | Virgile1994 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bonjour Virgile, Pour info, en créant un rond-point, tu as malheureusement créé un trou dans une relation de randonnée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14182895#map=19/45.019223/5.650803), c'est désor... commented 2025-06-15 10:08:05 UTC by NicolasGrosjean ♦10 |
| 114827849 (Comments: 3) | Matteo Calosi (Discussed changesets: 7) | Grazie per la risposta; ho rimosso i tag da quel nodo. Buon mapping, Marco commented 2025-06-15 10:05:30 UTC by MarcoR ♦515 |
| 167641010 (Comments: 1) | baumgrenze (Discussed changesets: 4) | merci! commented 2025-06-15 10:04:06 UTC by kuhni74 ♦355 |
| 167642372 (Comments: 1) | Ellvanes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-06-15 09:30:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 163835221 (Comments: 1) | Andre Engels (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hallo Andre, ik zie dat je in Gemeente Venray veel via luchtfoto's op de kaart hebt gezet. Helaas zijn de luchtfoto's ingehaald door de werkelijkheid. commented 2025-06-15 09:29:20 UTC by Roelieboelie ♦36 |
| 78252417 (Comments: 1) | Rom1 (Discussed changesets: 62) | Salut Romain, En regardant la carte Cyclosm je vois un trait bleu sur un trottoir… Tu es certain que l’aménagement est accessible aux vélos ? Je ne crois pas avoir vu de signalisation a cet endroit. https://ww... commented 2025-06-15 09:22:25 UTC by Axelos ♦101 |
| 167638635 (Comments: 7) | Jan Olieslagers (Discussed changesets: 95) | https://dataforsyningen.dk/map/2776 commented 2025-06-15 09:21:28 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,640 |
| 167620640 (Comments: 1) | Heimwerkerking_05 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, weswegen hast du den Weg zwischen den Häusern entfernt? Auf dem Luftbild ist dieser als highway service jedoch erkennbar. Die Tags, die angebracht waren, waren richtig. Gruss wies1 commented 2025-06-15 09:19:16 UTC by wies1 ♦143 |
| 160956544 (Comments: 1) | mackerski (Discussed changesets: 31) | very nicely mapped 👌 commented 2025-06-15 09:15:07 UTC by stillhart ♦151 |
| 167571140 (Comments: 1) | dennis78map (Discussed changesets: 2) | Добро пожаловать! 👋 Спасибо за улучшение Колпинского района! commented 2025-06-15 09:13:50 UTC by dypa ♦111 |
| 167313109 (Comments: 2) | Sim100v (Discussed changesets: 5) | I will do a survey this summer and will update the statue details commented 2025-06-15 09:12:44 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦243 |
| 67484272 (Comments: 2) | pangoSE (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thanks for looking into this. Feel free to remove the tags and perhaps let's make a note that ask for confirmation on the ground? commented 2025-06-15 09:09:48 UTC by pangoSE ♦409 |
 | 120130080 (Comments: 2) | P-E_LRX (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello I am aware of this. I believe once the community gets the land title as community land they will be interested in Conservancy model again. Isiolo county has seen delay or political unwill to give communities thier land title... commented 2025-06-15 09:04:36 UTC by P-E_LRX ♦7 |
| 166794699 (Comments: 1) | eightlix (Discussed changesets: 4) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-06-15 09:02:49 UTC by dypa ♦111 |
| 167636400 (Comments: 1) | GioDemu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Proxy Delhaize Ma Campagne is already on the map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/282464794 I wish to raise your attention that "Organic Maps" is not recommended for OSM editing. The main reas... commented 2025-06-15 09:01:49 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,463 |
| 166725880 (Comments: 1) | adaholding (Discussed changesets: 2) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-06-15 08:59:55 UTC by dypa ♦111 |
| 167019835 (Comments: 1) | Herr T (Discussed changesets: 3) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-06-15 08:58:32 UTC by dypa ♦111 |
| 166939042 (Comments: 1) | Альберт Балтачев (Discussed changesets: 10) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-06-15 08:57:30 UTC by dypa ♦111 |
| 167377215 (Comments: 1) | OSMANIA666 (Discussed changesets: 4) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-06-15 08:56:17 UTC by dypa ♦111 |
| 167627855 (Comments: 1) | Adaroma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Adorama, Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your valuable contributions. OSM has a standard for recording opening hours and service times, which you can find here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. You used it correctly... commented 2025-06-15 08:52:13 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦87 |
| 166162358 (Comments: 2) | baumgrenze (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke Tippfehler commented 2025-06-15 08:48:19 UTC by baumgrenze ♦11 |
| 133095711 (Comments: 2) | rheinwanderer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hab es wieder geändert, sonst vergesse ich das commented 2025-06-15 08:39:06 UTC by limes11 ♦877 |
| 167640450 (Comments: 1) | Ellvanes (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-06-15 08:30:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,863 |
| 77677460 (Comments: 2) | micccey (Discussed changesets: 22) | Lieber Herr Möhrmann, vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Ich möchte Ihnen ein paar kleine Tipps für die OpenStreetMap geben: Zunächst ist einen Änderungssatz zu kommentieren nicht die beste Variante, um den Wunsch ei... commented 2025-06-15 08:28:40 UTC by micccey ♦23 |
| 167639934 (Comments: 1) | Buurmanenbuurmanopreis (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag BeB Wa eer een weg een andere weg kruist maak dan altrijd een verbiningsnode. Nu krijg je foutmeldingen. Crossing ways. Verder lopen over die busbanen talloze OV routerelaties. Die zullen denk ik ook aangepast moeten worden. Dat gaat niet... commented 2025-06-15 08:25:00 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167640153 (Comments: 1) | springkraut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jane Austen's last days - House commented 2025-06-15 08:21:41 UTC by springkraut ♦1 |
| 167639320 (Comments: 2) | Buurmanenbuurmanopreis (Discussed changesets: 4) | Edotor JOSM is wel geschikt om routerelaties te bewerken. editor josm stap voor stap https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 MVG eggie commented 2025-06-15 08:14:59 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 158035446 (Comments: 9) | Supt_of_Printing (Discussed changesets: 99) | Thanks the tracks look closer to my visit from last year, but the Port Dock platform is longer and much more to the south east. Shame there aren't any sat images from the last year! See my note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/446109... commented 2025-06-15 08:09:33 UTC by ne17sg ♦4 |
| 167638770 (Comments: 1) | Buurmanenbuurmanopreis (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-15 08:02:12 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167630972 (Comments: 1) | E314c (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-15 08:01:00 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 6342483 (Comments: 1) | Meghanand (Discussed changesets: 1) | if you are by any chance still visiting this area - can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806433 ? Construction was finished, right? commented 2025-06-15 07:50:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 155406751 (Comments: 1) | Supt_of_Printing (Discussed changesets: 99) | You have downgraded residential roads that other mappers have added; and named from authoritative sources as "alley". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley These are clearly residential roads. Needs re... commented 2025-06-15 07:47:10 UTC by CloCkWeRX ♦343 |
| 48870128 (Comments: 1) | stevens (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806417 ? Have you since been there? I bet that it is not existing anymore, maybe you are capable of checking this? commented 2025-06-15 07:41:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 6033722 (Comments: 1) | nhmapguy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806418 ? commented 2025-06-15 07:39:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 20684398 (Comments: 1) | Peter Dobratz (Discussed changesets: 12) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806419 ? commented 2025-06-15 07:38:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 20667943 (Comments: 1) | Peter Dobratz (Discussed changesets: 12) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806421 ? commented 2025-06-15 07:38:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 167509639 (Comments: 4) | frado (Discussed changesets: 1) | me queda claro commented 2025-06-15 07:37:50 UTC by frado ♦1 |
| 166541390 (Comments: 3) | davidbgr (Discussed changesets: 4) | ¡Gracias! commented 2025-06-15 07:29:07 UTC by Jan Olieslagers ♦200 |
| 167559644 (Comments: 17) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 318) | Die Basisnetzwerke wurden ja schon sehr kontrovers diskutiert und es kann zu keinem Beschluss. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wie-umgehen-mit-radwegenetzen-in-routenrelationen/ commented 2025-06-15 07:14:45 UTC by geozeisig ♦222 |
| 167637711 (Comments: 1) | The Grand Monarch - Hotel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Address: The Grand Monarch - Hotel, Dewas Rd, near Narayana e-Techno School, Mahalaxmi Nagar, Nagziri, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh 456010 Phone: 077239 99157 commented 2025-06-15 06:45:47 UTC by The Grand Monarch - Hotel ♦1 |
| 167637537 (Comments: 1) | sejtam (Discussed changesets: 1) | I found no way to specify that access is for motorcycles only. (no distinction between cars and otorcycles). The width should make sure cars cannot use it, but do mapping utilities take that into account? Note that while the SDE highway is a toll ... commented 2025-06-15 06:35:11 UTC by sejtam ♦1 |
 | 164877285 (Comments: 2) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 122) | Unfortunately, when you are fixing incorrect worldwide mapping, there's always going to be side-effects :-( commented 2025-06-15 06:17:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167551654 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167637082 commented 2025-06-15 06:10:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167552579 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636996 commented 2025-06-15 06:07:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167552455 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636968 commented 2025-06-15 06:05:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167552376 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636968 commented 2025-06-15 06:05:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167552222 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636968 commented 2025-06-15 06:05:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167551661 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636936 commented 2025-06-15 06:04:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 165270528 (Comments: 2) | ncleanser (Discussed changesets: 17) | I reverted this changeset because mapper did not argue Why his changes are legit and to me they are just making the data worse. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636371 commented 2025-06-15 05:38:52 UTC by Metzor ♦364 |
| 165691739 (Comments: 1) | JamesCPrentice (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, I see you added layer= tags to houses on West Hill Road. Do you realise that layer=-10 or any minus layer is underground? Thus I've removed the layer=-? tags. commented 2025-06-15 05:38:32 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,828 |
| 167550839 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636158 commented 2025-06-15 05:26:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167550732 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636158 commented 2025-06-15 05:26:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167550671 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636158 commented 2025-06-15 05:26:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167539490 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 59) | DWG revert at User's request https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636158 commented 2025-06-15 05:26:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167476013 (Comments: 7) | Bruno413 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Vielen Dank. commented 2025-06-15 05:23:33 UTC by Bruno413 ♦7 |
| 167611791 (Comments: 1) | Landenwhipplesmacker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18340 commented 2025-06-15 05:17:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦31,689 |
| 167495495 (Comments: 3) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 53) | Thanks! commented 2025-06-15 05:10:53 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦656 |
| 167532726 (Comments: 2) | Cat2006 (Discussed changesets: 11) | +1 for keeping the crossing. "informal" might be a better tag for it though. commented 2025-06-15 05:10:11 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦656 |
| 167626017 (Comments: 4) | SamBouwer (Discussed changesets: 1) | (bij volgende edits) commented 2025-06-15 04:47:52 UTC by SamBouwer ♦1 |
| 167121980 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 83) | Reverted because of unnecessary node #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167634924 commented 2025-06-15 03:31:44 UTC by IvaLedinščak ♦30 |
| 167613282 (Comments: 2) | vlakos555 (Discussed changesets: 72) | Vďaka za upozornenie. Opravil som to. commented 2025-06-15 03:08:18 UTC by vlakos555 ♦47 |
| 167384941 (Comments: 1) | innovativestructures (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I was reviewing your changeset and I noticed that you only wrote "-" in the changeset comment field. In the future, please do use meaningful changeset comments-- as “-” does not help ot... commented 2025-06-15 02:51:04 UTC by pwbriggs ♦34 |
| 167634213 (Comments: 1) | CooperR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Should've also added: "Added Operator." Oh well. commented 2025-06-15 02:26:39 UTC by CooperR ♦2 |
| 167567888 (Comments: 1) | TsumugiWenders (Discussed changesets: 13) | 紬ちゃん、絵を描くの頑張っててえら〜い♡ ……でもでも、細かいとこ、ちゃんと見てる〜？ヒカリ、ちょっとだけ手伝っちゃおっかな〜……って、あれ？また疲れちゃ... commented 2025-06-15 01:56:54 UTC by 橘ヒカリ ♦34 |
| 167514249 (Comments: 1) | alpr_1984 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for posting all of these readers! Your contributions help to raise awareness that many readers are being installed in SE KS and SW MO. Nice work! :) I've started posting the readers that I spot in SW MO. commented 2025-06-15 00:46:59 UTC by jrklein ♦2 |
| 166631294 (Comments: 2) | Söderman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jag ber om ursäkt för att jag missade Ditt meddelande förrän nu. Namnet till trots innehåller ”Myndigheternas skrivregler” regler som bör förstås som allmängiltiga för det svenska spr&ar... commented 2025-06-14 23:39:25 UTC by Söderman ♦1 |
| 167627045 (Comments: 1) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 30) | Split necessary for node limits commented 2025-06-14 23:08:29 UTC by Makeena ♦32 |
| 166757120 (Comments: 2) | extra5gold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! I know there are more in Branson that I’ll have to confirm on my next trip. There are also articles about them being installed in Nixa. commented 2025-06-14 23:00:30 UTC by extra5gold ♦1 |
| 161228475 (Comments: 2) | ig4map (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi ivanbranco, thx! This is a sunflower field with a creative and colorful sign that reads "PHUKET." The sign with vibrant, abstract patterns and is placed prominently in the foreground. The sunflowers in the background add to the sc... commented 2025-06-14 22:18:56 UTC by ig4map ♦30 |
 | 167169634 (Comments: 4) | hatul (Discussed changesets: 31) | I just looked on the satellite images and there some ruins are clearly visible commented 2025-06-14 22:04:05 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 167577239 (Comments: 2) | rtw0_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | To ciekawe, nigdy jeszcze tak nie miałem. W Organicu edycje są błyskawiczne (bo i tak go używam na co dzień do nawigacji, więc jak jest coś do dodania to jest szybciej niż przez dedykowane edytory). Te edycje były nawet parę godzin od siebi... commented 2025-06-14 22:02:42 UTC by rtw0_ ♦1 |
| 167600106 (Comments: 1) | Adrianna Zięborak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie ma tam sklepu, nie dodaje się takich rzeczy do płotu. Wycofane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167630535 commented 2025-06-14 21:59:54 UTC by bartgron ♦133 |
| 163863213 (Comments: 1) | hakaka (Discussed changesets: 2) | It is possible to walk much further north a long stretch through the forest avoiding the main road commented 2025-06-14 21:58:50 UTC by John “Brian” Peterson ♦1 |
| 126447845 (Comments: 2) | Vis_M (Discussed changesets: 3) | No, it was just edits from personal capacity. Thank you! commented 2025-06-14 21:47:48 UTC by Vis_M ♦15 |
| 167473997 (Comments: 1) | mat (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ce n'est pas du tout un chemin de terre, mais bel et bien bitumé. Je vous invite à vérifier et revert cette modification. commented 2025-06-14 21:37:07 UTC by Topographix ♦1 |
| 167629104 (Comments: 3) | smh3005 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag smh, 'k Geloof je direct. Evt kun je een afdakje apart intekenen met building=roof en layer=1 Veel plezier met mappen. MVG eggie commented 2025-06-14 21:32:47 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167628814 (Comments: 1) | dom-666 (Discussed changesets: 62) | what was the reason for deletiong? commented 2025-06-14 21:00:46 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 167162416 (Comments: 1) | ompatekar (Discussed changesets: 13) | "as per the source"?? What source. Stop this shameful reverting of community edits. commented 2025-06-14 20:59:09 UTC by Vis_M ♦15 |
| 167628963 (Comments: 1) | smh3005 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-06-14 20:58:03 UTC by eggie ♦40,507 |
| 167610573 (Comments: 2) | dom-666 (Discussed changesets: 62) | This changeset was reverted because it performed unagreed and undiscussed political/religious changes. commented 2025-06-14 20:57:45 UTC by yrtimiD ♦961 |
| 167168715 (Comments: 1) | ompatekar (Discussed changesets: 13) | What source? STOP reverting community edits without discussion. You OLA editors are shamelessly undoing all of the community edits. Stop. commented 2025-06-14 20:54:22 UTC by Vis_M ♦15 |
| 167160196 (Comments: 1) | ompatekar (Discussed changesets: 13) | That is not a "residential road". STOP reverting community edits without discussion. MDRs should be classified as secondary roads per osm.wiki/India/Tags/Highway and osm.wiki/Kerala-MDR . commented 2025-06-14 20:35:54 UTC by Vis_M ♦15 |
| 167589140 (Comments: 1) | untriex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, podla popisu v tejto sade zmien malo byt presnejsie specifikovane, o aku zabranu sa jedna. Ale realna zmena je, ze z cyklistickej zabrany si spravil blizsie "neurcenu" zabranu, co je presny opak popisu. Prosim oprav si to. commented 2025-06-14 20:26:44 UTC by t_ja ♦203 |
| 166112025 (Comments: 1) | fleopaul (Discussed changesets: 1) | what you meant by fixme:type=faience ? commented 2025-06-14 20:26:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |
| 157579508 (Comments: 1) | Przemek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 16) | znak nakazu skrętu w prawo z Gościnnej w Panewnicką co prawda istnieje, ale jedynie w formie znaku świetlnego – zaświeca się on jedynie gdy z uwagi na ruch wzdłuż Panewnickiej kolejka od strony Gościnnej zbytnio urośnie commented 2025-06-14 20:18:48 UTC by dzamper ♦106 |