| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 176302475 (Comments: 1) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Fahrradinfrastruktur, die keine bauliche Trennung zur Fahrbahn hat, soll in OSM nicht als separater Weg eingetragen werden. Auch sonst habe ich bei der Kreuzung Berner Heerweg/August-Krogmann-Straße das Gefühl, dass das Radverkehrsmapping ... commented 2025-12-23 22:44:33 UTC by kadiwa ♦57 |
 | 176094477 (Comments: 2) | Oussama A (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi VLD0251, Thank you for this remark. I usually double check using Google maps, local sources (social media), but you are right, I'll pay more attention to this in the fiture. Regarding the "At", it's not commun in this... commented 2025-12-23 22:41:15 UTC by Oussama A ♦1 |
| 169678882 (Comments: 7) | SteMue (Discussed changesets: 13) | eine aktuelle MB E-Klasse ist z.B. 1.880 mm breit, die S-Klasse 1.954 mm, ein VW Golf 1.789 mm, ein BMW X5 2.004 mm und ein Fiat 500 alt: 1.320 mm, neu 1.627 mm. Ein 2,30 breites Standardfahrzeug ist z.B. so was: https://kudashop.de/mb-actros-mp-iv-s... commented 2025-12-23 22:22:31 UTC by fmc_1 ♦10 |
 | 176281139 (Comments: 1) | ColinPerry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM! I see that you have added the tag "name:en"="Thackery St.", presumably to indicate that "Street" can be abbreviated. On OSM we generally spell out those abbreviations, so "Thackery Street"... commented 2025-12-23 22:20:05 UTC by schobbish ♦15 |
| 162034767 (Comments: 2) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Changeset partially reverted because it deleted valid lane guidance for Patton Drive. This changeset merged the Patton Drive ways from the Walmart parking lot to North Franklin Street, causing incorrect lanes and turn:lanes tagging. This error would ... commented 2025-12-23 22:16:57 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
 | 176287553 (Comments: 5) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 69) | A te znaki nie są zaprojektowane też w taki sposób aby w razie wypadku/kolizji czy nawet zagęszczenia ruchu nie ograniczyć bardziej prędkości? Nawet w przypadku małego remontu myślę że są w stanie chwilowo ograniczyć prędkość. N... commented 2025-12-23 22:10:22 UTC by stasiu512 ♦216 |
| 176237689 (Comments: 2) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 15) | Sounds good, I can recalibrate my tertiary classification from here on out. commented 2025-12-23 22:04:47 UTC by Yushclay ♦17 |
| 161807846 (Comments: 4) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 15) | I also reconnected the ways to their respective nodes that you deleted in this changeset in a follow-up changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174662094 commented 2025-12-23 22:00:43 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176287403 (Comments: 2) | eigenval (Discussed changesets: 3) | Relacja usunięta w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176327952 - dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi commented 2025-12-23 21:59:19 UTC by eigenval ♦5 |
 | 176319813 (Comments: 3) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 54) | Ja, sonst beschwert sich iD, dass die zu nahe an node/9316381617 liegt. Und -1 weil ich nicht den Anschein erwecken will, dass der andere über der Brücke liegt. commented 2025-12-23 21:57:44 UTC by hlfan ♦83 |
 | 176161940 (Comments: 1) | josepgomila6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. Veig que continues insistint a eliminar etiquetes sense justificació vàlida. Et recomano que expliquis que pretens aconseguir a la comunitat i mirem de buscar solucions correctes. Altrament, caldrà demanar que et bloquegin ... commented 2025-12-23 21:55:03 UTC by jmaspons ♦74 |
 | 176324672 (Comments: 1) | Doroszlai Attila (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Attila, please stop misusing the tag "name". I'm sure, that there is not such official name as "GreenWay Čerpacia stanica Gallon Považský Chlmec (P)", if I visit this place. Instead, use the "name=Green... commented 2025-12-23 21:53:27 UTC by t_ja ♦230 |
 | 176320251 (Comments: 1) | schermpeter (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me zo kloppen. Dan is het verder zaak om het water toe te voegen en evt de oevers. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-23 21:50:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
 | 176297757 (Comments: 1) | Paul-François (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19993694 : c'est une relation de/vers, ici il n'y a ni l'un ni l'autre, donc sans objet (le passage piéton est sur la voie. Pont chinois : deux remarques, - c'est u... commented 2025-12-23 21:49:23 UTC by trial ♦1,005 |
| 176322316 (Comments: 12) | Dennis Knollenburg RAV Flevoland (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke... maar de busbaan aan de oostzijde is wel verbonden met de bovenlaag. dat heb je zelf gedaan. Ik heb het punt verplaatst naar waar de busbaan naar beneden duikt. commented 2025-12-23 21:43:40 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176325514 (Comments: 1) | Krzysztof26799 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-23 21:43:33 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 174794939 (Comments: 1) | gFido (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-23 21:42:11 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176327119 (Comments: 1) | gFido (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-23 21:41:55 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176327263 (Comments: 1) | Mappigator (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi, Geen paden vastmaken aan de landuse svp. Ik heb het losgemaakt. De kaart wordt anders onwerkbaar voor anderen. Linker alttoets gebruiken bij intekenen voorkomt dat plakken. gr eggie commented 2025-12-23 21:41:34 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176327161 (Comments: 1) | Mappigator (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi, Het adres heb ik weer teruggezet. Volgende keer alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen van de adresnode. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-23 21:38:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176194810 (Comments: 4) | didier2020 (Discussed changesets: 62) | Mise à jour visible sur WMT : https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=386891&type=relation&map=14.0/48.6288/2.8227 commented 2025-12-23 21:37:13 UTC by pyrog ♦384 |
| 176283280 (Comments: 3) | Đuro Jiří (Discussed changesets: 88) | Here you change this week a roof into a carport ;-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916031011 commented 2025-12-23 21:35:48 UTC by Sandal man ♦401 |
| 176261871 (Comments: 1) | Emeka Abazie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM! I'm marking this as Bad due to issues in addr:street, opening hours, and phone number. Please see the OSM wiki (https://osm.wiki) for details on how to properly format these tags. Additionally, do not use the description t... commented 2025-12-23 21:33:49 UTC by schobbish ♦15 |
| 176259585 (Comments: 1) | 10 Day Smiles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM! I'm marking this as Bad due to issues in addr:street, opening hours, and phone number. Please see the OSM wiki (https://osm.wiki) for details on how to properly format these tags. Additionally, do not use the description t... commented 2025-12-23 21:33:09 UTC by schobbish ♦15 |
| 176326754 (Comments: 2) | Mappigator (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ik heb het even aangepast, want dat gaat niet met editor iD . Er loopt hier een routerelatie. Groet eggie commented 2025-12-23 21:32:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 162596452 (Comments: 2) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 15) | You also deleted valid retail building geometries from New River Valley Center and redrew the entire building. What is the point of deleting those valid buildings and redrawing them from scratch? There's no need to do that. Just modify the exist... commented 2025-12-23 21:30:49 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176259239 (Comments: 1) | groomelewisville (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM! I'm marking this as Bad due to multiple issues in the address tags, opening hours, and phone number (phone number has been automatically fixed). Please see the OSM wiki (https://osm.wiki) for details on how to properly for... commented 2025-12-23 21:30:12 UTC by schobbish ♦15 |
 | 176062528 (Comments: 3) | MountAgou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi MountAgou, Thanks for the reply! I completely understand what you were saying by mentioning ways way/224100277 and way/1283859123, however, this segment is extremely short and merging in one way for 29 meters it would make more confu... commented 2025-12-23 21:26:18 UTC by BrackoNe ♦117 |
| 176324607 (Comments: 2) | RuleVR (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hier het draadje en anders de vraag nog maar eens voorleggen aan het forum. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hoe-elektrische-snel-laadpleinen-zodanig-mappen-dat-ze-goed-onderscheidbaar-vindbaar-zijn-in-vergelijk-met-individuele-laadstations/1... commented 2025-12-23 21:26:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 167598825 (Comments: 2) | WilliamHarrison (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hey @Jose Luis Infante Could you clarify the intersection or let me know which traffic signal was deleted? commented 2025-12-23 21:25:16 UTC by WilliamHarrison ♦18 |
| 176325563 (Comments: 1) | MartenMrfc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Marten.. Het lijkt me prima zo. Mapse eggie commented 2025-12-23 21:19:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176325332 (Comments: 1) | karolymaller (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution commented 2025-12-23 21:17:25 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176323844 (Comments: 8) | jcavl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alle begin is moeilijk. Het Heemlandje heb ik op een place=locality gezet en de meadow verwijderd. Hier land landuse op landuse. commented 2025-12-23 21:14:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
 | 176326348 (Comments: 1) | geduxazz (Discussed changesets: 5) | How did You manage to add a random point so far away 😭 commented 2025-12-23 21:08:41 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦34 |
| 162366141 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello iismitch 55, what was the point of reworking this mall? You deleted valid mall building geometries and redrew them from scratch. Please don't do that. It's against good practice on OSM. If you really want to "rework" buildin... commented 2025-12-23 21:06:38 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 162366017 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello iismitch 55, what was the point of reworking this mall? You deleted valid mall building geometries and redrew them from scratch. Please don't do that. It's against good practice on OSM. If you really want to "rework" buildin... commented 2025-12-23 21:06:12 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176322769 (Comments: 3) | Fr@ns (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank je. commented 2025-12-23 21:03:19 UTC by Fr@ns ♦1 |
| 169832033 (Comments: 3) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 40) | En cette saison, il y a des crêches un peu partout. capacity=1 plus un âne et un bœuf je crois^^. commented 2025-12-23 20:44:21 UTC by trial ♦1,005 |
| 29839496 (Comments: 1) | KartoGrapHiti (Discussed changesets: 77) | Ist die Bergstraße zwischen Schaufenberg und Burgring tasächlich eine Einbahnstraße? In Mapillary sieht man keine entsprechende Beschilderung. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4351973 commented 2025-12-23 20:33:22 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦257 |
| 162253702 (Comments: 1) | VBH17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I recently drove on the tollway in both directions, and the speed limits remain posted at 60 mph like the main lanes. Some of the signs seemed pretty old, too. Where did you get this information? It seems unlikely that they would raise and then lower... commented 2025-12-23 20:28:02 UTC by kitto33 ♦7 |
 | 167165718 (Comments: 1) | fabiotofy (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ciao, perché hai messo il name "Sentiero dell'amicizia" su n way invece di creare una relation per il sentiero? commented 2025-12-23 20:26:51 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
| 162365570 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello iismitch 55, what was the point of reworking this mall? You deleted valid mall building geometries and redrew them from scratch. Please don't do that. It's against good practice on OSM. If you really want to "rework" buildin... commented 2025-12-23 20:24:36 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
 | 176202028 (Comments: 2) | 蕉饼电脑 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Pingtan is de facto not administrated by Fuzhou (despite being de jure a part of Fuzhou). According to the rules of OpenStreetMap, Pingtan should be excluded from Fuzhou. However, the rest of the OSMChina community has determined that Pingtan shou... commented 2025-12-23 20:23:07 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦30 |
| 168768262 (Comments: 3) | BerbiceRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh, it was my mistake, I didn't check history properly. Sorry for my comment and for causing you inconvenience! commented 2025-12-23 20:18:28 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦341 |
| 176039259 (Comments: 1) | cakeam (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wydaje się zbędne. commented 2025-12-23 20:17:06 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,052 |
| 176026458 (Comments: 1) | cakeam (Discussed changesets: 3) | PL:zone20 byłoby dla znaku B-43; jeśli tutaj jest D-40, to raczej PL:living_street. commented 2025-12-23 20:16:23 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,052 |
 | 176253461 (Comments: 2) | joy3221 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176324819 using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm-revert commented 2025-12-23 20:16:03 UTC by nevw ♦2,099 |
 | 176312873 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 7) | AI inversat sensurl aiurea. Se bat cap in cap. LAsa-l asa cum era, ca era corect!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! commented 2025-12-23 20:15:10 UTC by rarad74 ♦335 |
| 176016009 (Comments: 1) | cakeam (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wydaje się zbędne. commented 2025-12-23 20:13:14 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,052 |
| 176190076 (Comments: 1) | Sigo (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bonjour, ce changeset (dont le commentaire n'est pas très utile pour les autres contributeurs) a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre, semble-t-il en prolongeant une chemin au-delà de... commented 2025-12-23 20:12:46 UTC by StC ♦385 |
 | 175713193 (Comments: 1) | christianwang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. I noticed you have added residential areas as your first edit. Some of these do not appear to be properly named (based on the corresponding road names), and the areas you have added overlap existing ones. Please do not overlap residential area... commented 2025-12-23 20:12:06 UTC by finn-hound ♦11 |
| 176320634 (Comments: 1) | s6o6l6o (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176324740 Pozdrawiam i proszę o nie niszczenie mapy commented 2025-12-23 20:10:44 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176321039 (Comments: 4) | MartenMrfc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dat gebeurt direct. Even CTRL-F5 een paar keer .. Je schermcache leegmaken. commented 2025-12-23 20:02:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176324425 (Comments: 1) | rarad74 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Nu se pun strazi ca rezidential road in parcari. Nu locuieste nimeni acolo. Service road se pun. Service road raman. commented 2025-12-23 20:02:15 UTC by rarad74 ♦335 |
| 173726757 (Comments: 2) | vbertola (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks for spotting this! It looks like the same object, but the position of 603833919 is definitely wrong. Maybe the statue was moved? (603833919 is 16 year old) commented 2025-12-23 20:01:35 UTC by vbertola ♦7 |
| 176304571 (Comments: 1) | Gehrke (Discussed changesets: 24) | Es werden noch einige Straßen in der Gemeinde umbenannt, kann ich die auch im vorraus anpassen, oder soll ich lieber bis Jahresende warten? Die ersten Schilder wurden wohl schon montiert, da wo ich am Samstag geprüft habe fehlen aber noch ... commented 2025-12-23 19:56:34 UTC by Tatfahren ♦307 |
| 176285523 (Comments: 6) | JohnnyWvD (Discussed changesets: 14) | Nee.. dat bord doet niets in OSM. Ik heb (zie boven) hgv =no toegevoegd aan de Vuursteenberg. Gebruikers van een app voor vrachtverkeer zullen dus niet routeren hier. In OSM routeert het dus niet voor vrachtverkeer (hgv=no) https://wiki.opens... commented 2025-12-23 19:54:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176285064 (Comments: 3) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 175) | no to mamy problem bo okazuje się, że dodawanie adresów na obrysach budynków to wg OSM Wiki nie tylko nie jest błędem, ale nawet i jest podobno preferowanym sposobem na terenie Polski… https://wiki.openstreetmap... commented 2025-12-23 19:52:02 UTC by dzamper ♦182 |
| 176285376 (Comments: 5) | JohnnyWvD (Discussed changesets: 14) | Oke.. duidelijk... Tja... Ook al klopt het in OSM.. sommige mensen hebben nu eenmaal een bord voor hun hoofd en negeren alles. In OSM routeert het niet. commented 2025-12-23 19:51:39 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176323849 (Comments: 1) | Mjisbgshjsiyj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 431 of your last 438 changes were deletions. This is quite... commented 2025-12-23 19:46:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176196019 (Comments: 4) | Kouldream (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi.. Er bestaan voor garmin een speciale OSM kaart voor velomobielen. Je zou het het de maker PeeWee32 even kunnen vragen. Die vind je wel op het forum. Zie draadje Nieuwjaarsborrel. commented 2025-12-23 19:28:02 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176254493 (Comments: 2) | seascorpio82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I would love to help. I will get on this! commented 2025-12-23 19:25:01 UTC by seascorpio82 ♦1 |
| 170177730 (Comments: 1) | tvbrene (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ich glaube hier ist irgendwas beim upload schiefgelaufen, hier sind einige leere nodes entstanden, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13058815451/history Kannst du das vielleicht nochmal prüfen? commented 2025-12-23 19:17:53 UTC by Tatfahren ♦307 |
 | 176027008 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 30) | The use of road 10 it allowed only a few days in a year, at very specific hours. You change the permission from PRIVATE to YES. This is incorrect. Please revert the change. commented 2025-12-23 19:13:22 UTC by Dindia ♦29 |
| 175644413 (Comments: 6) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Wycofane commented 2025-12-23 19:11:23 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦838 |
 | 176021044 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 30) | The use of road 10 it allowed only a few days in a year, at very specific hours. You change the permission from PRIVATE to YES. This is incorrect. Please revert the change. commented 2025-12-23 19:11:21 UTC by Dindia ♦29 |
 | 176322827 (Comments: 1) | R4v3nB14ck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi R4v3nB14ck, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 82% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 59 building(s) - 1 natural(s) - 35 source(s)... commented 2025-12-23 19:10:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
 | 173765029 (Comments: 9) | OrDal (Discussed changesets: 27) | @Taya_S I saw some relations do it for the whole country, e.g. relation/13834513. So, I did the same for Syria as well. I’m not familiar with OSM’s preferred approach regarding such topics. If an approach such in relation/12931502 is a... commented 2025-12-23 19:10:19 UTC by ASMapper ♦5 |
 | 176313075 (Comments: 1) | Paul Morrison ESX (Discussed changesets: 2) | (Review requested) Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Access tags like foot=no in OSM are intended to reflect the legal position. In the UK, pedestrians use highways by absolute right, unless there is a traffic order and sign (TSRGD diagram 625.... commented 2025-12-23 19:09:46 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 168966738 (Comments: 1) | VBNechtzeit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo VBNEchtzeit! Ich habe den von euch angelegten Knoten entfernt und mit dem an der "echten" Position von Hampi's Stop Shop verbunden (und den Verkauf von Tickets mit aufgenommen). Seid ihr bitte so nett und achtet bei... commented 2025-12-23 19:08:42 UTC by kmpoppe ♦99 |
| 149040345 (Comments: 1) | ds8x (Discussed changesets: 2) | I just noticed that the "bank" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265437036 (see note tag and https://locators.bankofamerica.com/co/fortcollins/atm-fort-collins-111015.html) that was merged into a building is only an ATM, and probably s... commented 2025-12-23 19:00:38 UTC by gpserror ♦228 |
 | 161090310 (Comments: 1) | Julmira (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144990869/history has shop = kios that was added in this edit Was it supposed to be shop=kiosk ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=kiosk ) ? Something else? commented 2025-12-23 18:57:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176288992 (Comments: 3) | Tommy Kuehn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi thanks for the reply! I was referring to the driveways not the road. If a road doesn't exist any longer you definitely can remove it from the map. commented 2025-12-23 18:49:57 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 176309616 (Comments: 1) | FF Neukieritzsch (Harti) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Zu deinen Änderungen habe ich ein paar kleine Anmerkungen: - Am Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13397733217: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden, Landnutzung... commented 2025-12-23 18:49:07 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176320857 (Comments: 1) | AlexRoelenga (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-23 18:46:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176318246 (Comments: 1) | sven de wit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-23 18:43:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 172395898 (Comments: 1) | CapitaineMoustache (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour, du coup est-ce qu'on peut marquer que les deux piscines à l'intérieur ne sont plus accessibles ? commented 2025-12-23 18:43:41 UTC by Syl ♦1,016 |
| 176317604 (Comments: 1) | ApelGringo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-23 18:42:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176258297 (Comments: 2) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 154) | Hallo, Der Tag healthcare:speciality=occupational bedeutet eine Spezialisierung in Arbeitsmedizin. Hier handelt es sich aber um Ergotherapien bzw. Physiotherapeuten und das wird mit mit healthcare:speciality=occupational_therapy getaggt. commented 2025-12-23 18:33:53 UTC by thetornado76 ♦176 |
| 176316422 (Comments: 1) | Firestone design (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das sieht bis hierhin schon ganz gut aus, nur eine Kleinigkeit fehlt. Bislang hat nur das Gebäude einen Namen, es fehlt die Anga... commented 2025-12-23 18:33:24 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176261522 (Comments: 3) | tobkab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, okay; wenn du Lust hast und es dir zutraust, könntest du dir das Schulgebäude vornehmen. Die Gebäudeumrisse stellen in der Regel auf das ab, was den Boden berührt ("Fußabdruck"). Daher werden Däc... commented 2025-12-23 18:20:01 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 175927920 (Comments: 3) | MaartenTheMapper (Discussed changesets: 12) | Er staan inderdaad veel fouten in de NSI. De meldingen in de iD-editor zijn ook geen foutmeldingen, maar suggesties. Dat kunnen ook verkeerde suggesties zijn. commented 2025-12-23 18:12:26 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,041 |
 | 176048259 (Comments: 8) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 33) | Так. Сокращатель ссылок сломан. В первых фигурных скобках про x должен быть commented 2025-12-23 17:58:51 UTC by empty_child ♦372 |
| 813033 (Comments: 2) | plexi32 (Discussed changesets: 15) | this is already 17years old, the fixme is on the end node of the way. Clarification is needed how the way continues (length and exact location). Meanwhile I would also suggest to check the way type here. commented 2025-12-23 17:57:46 UTC by plexi32 ♦12 |
 | 176319972 (Comments: 1) | Tuplanolla (Discussed changesets: 2) | The commit message was truncated for being too long. Here is the complete summary. Fixed some drunkard edits. Perfectly fine trails were removed without first tagging them with `was:highway=path` for different seasons. Some ways were folded ba... commented 2025-12-23 17:54:56 UTC by Tuplanolla ♦2 |
| 176025135 (Comments: 3) | Taxi Mapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | * no *right* turn in #3 above commented 2025-12-23 17:50:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 87555538 (Comments: 1) | Walter_Grassroot (Discussed changesets: 66) | 您好，您的这笔编辑中对一些政府部门增加了不符合事实的building=yes标签，我已经删去了。iD编辑器预设的某些地物类型会自动勾选了building=yes，需要根据实际情况酌情删除后再上传。 commented 2025-12-23 17:32:41 UTC by 真中あお ♦38 |
 | 162274978 (Comments: 1) | Валентин Ян (Discussed changesets: 43) | Не треба до ліній додавати type=multipolygon - це атрибут лише зв'язків commented 2025-12-23 17:20:41 UTC by mike140 ♦361 |
| 171338874 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 20) | User michael60634 downvoted this commit in retaliation, nothing is wrong with it. commented 2025-12-23 17:15:27 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 170413635 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 20) | User michael60634 downvoted this commit in retaliation, nothing is wrong with it. commented 2025-12-23 17:15:24 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 170355088 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 20) | User michael60634 downvoted this commit in retaliation, nothing is wrong with it. commented 2025-12-23 17:15:21 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 176257108 (Comments: 1) | Charbi1988 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Chari, willkommen bei OSM. Danke dass du uns hilfst, die Karte zu verbessern. operator=Dauerparkplatz? Heißst der Betreiber des Parkplatzes wirklich so? Die Tankstelle ist als Punkt erfasst. Die Attribute sollten nicht doppel... commented 2025-12-23 17:10:42 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,465 |
 | 176316601 (Comments: 1) | leobhat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Th... commented 2025-12-23 16:56:22 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦103 |
| 175372595 (Comments: 7) | josepgomila6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Un detalle, name:<lg>, no es el nombre oficial de un sitio, si no el nombre en ese idioma. Londres no es el nombre oficial de London, es la manera de decir London en español. Si un nombre no se utiliza nada en una lengua, puede pa... commented 2025-12-23 16:54:45 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦242 |
 | 176101454 (Comments: 2) | BakoyeRiver (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello samuelzammit, Thank you for the information provided! There is imagery from 2025-12-22, and it shows vehicles actively moving on the flyover. With this imagery, I have opened the construction here. Happy mapping! commented 2025-12-23 16:53:00 UTC by BakoyeRiver ♦3 |
| 176155235 (Comments: 1) | nacador (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo nacador, woher nimmst du die Information, dass die Straße Lattenkampstieg heißt? Generell sollte man am besten an jedem Changeset eine Quelle angeben, wenn man neue Informationen einträgt (vor allem aus Lizenzgründen). ... commented 2025-12-23 16:45:01 UTC by kadiwa ♦57 |
| 174923005 (Comments: 2) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 346) | In mijn wijzigingen hier heb ik de brug in beide richtingen opengezet. Later kwam ik er achter dat de noordelijke helft inderdaad nog niet open is. Omdat de oude weg al is verwijderd en daarmee de doorgaande weg tijdelijk is afgesloten, is een... commented 2025-12-23 16:44:29 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,041 |
| 176033078 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 9) | In the absence of a response I finally fixed it. In your wiki page it says "responding within 24 hours is treated as a top priority", what happened? commented 2025-12-23 16:33:05 UTC by Syl ♦1,016 |
| 176316182 (Comments: 1) | Tactist (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Wat is de bron van je toevoegingen. Wanneer dit een bulkimport is uit een databestand is dit niet zomaar toegestaan.... commented 2025-12-23 16:28:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 174382109 (Comments: 2) | hellflower (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you! commented 2025-12-23 16:25:08 UTC by hellflower ♦6 |
| 176314522 (Comments: 1) | g43g34g34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-23 16:23:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 170103569 (Comments: 4) | enzo_immergis (Discussed changesets: 5) | D'ailleurs est-ce que tu aurais plus d'info sur le way/142073370 ? Il semble s'arrêter en plein milieu d'un champ. Mais il semble bien exister : https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=17.69/43.925719/4.82011... commented 2025-12-23 16:17:15 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦12 |
| 176226801 (Comments: 1) | Shekhar Prasad Bhatt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Your mappings are below the quality HOTOSM expects. Please strengthen your mapping skills. Quality prevails above quantity. Best regards commented 2025-12-23 16:15:54 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176313822 (Comments: 3) | Liskwartier (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ah.. mooi zo.. Ik heb de info samengevoegd van beide kunstwerken. Het staat nu alleen bij de kruising. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-23 16:14:46 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176313182 (Comments: 5) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 11) | Beste Niko, Het enige wat ik doe is valideren en evt helpen. Iemand demotiveren is niet mijn bedoeling. Jij beweert dat er geen fietspad is dat 5 dec jl is geopend. Het je het artikel bekeken? Wanneer ben je hier geweest? ... commented 2025-12-23 16:13:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 162891547 (Comments: 1) | zwombie (Discussed changesets: 17) | 👋plz check the expwy again to sure it not looks like messy and path overlap commented 2025-12-23 16:12:31 UTC by yzuio ♦7 |
| 175724736 (Comments: 1) | Shekhar Prasad Bhatt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Each building need to be mapped individually ! You collect many buildings and map them as one building. Invalidated. commented 2025-12-23 16:10:31 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176270269 (Comments: 8) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 23) | >> [...] aber bereits Gehwege gemapped waren [...] In der Regel nur dort, wo sie baulich getrennt sind oder es anderweitig schwer würde direkt die Straße zu erreichen. Das ist auch weitestgehend in Aachen so umgesetzt, funktionier... commented 2025-12-23 16:03:02 UTC by aixbrick ♦881 |
| 176315144 (Comments: 1) | RezGolf (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi RezGolf, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 8 highway(s) Could you please confirm if these... commented 2025-12-23 15:59:21 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 175755896 (Comments: 1) | arnalielsewhere (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Arnalie. Thanks for mapping on this project. A few remarks. A rectangular building needs only 4 nodes to map. Mostly you used 5. (1 alongside a wall) You often forgot to square the buildings you mapped. Please follow the roofli... commented 2025-12-23 15:55:23 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176313487 (Comments: 1) | DirkS02 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Dirk .. Wanneer een bedrijft verhuist zal toch het adres achter blijven? Dat heb je nu verwijderd. Het adres heb ik teruggezet. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-23 15:53:05 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 173615418 (Comments: 4) | stimoroll (Discussed changesets: 22) | widzę że więcej takich pustych relacji https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19741620 commented 2025-12-23 15:48:22 UTC by olo81 ♦696 |
| 176289811 (Comments: 2) | geosteven (Discussed changesets: 4) | I am not copying street names based on Bing Maps. Street names are based upon personal experience running the roads in this area via CityStrides. commented 2025-12-23 15:41:21 UTC by geosteven ♦3 |
 | 165293443 (Comments: 3) | fedoroff net (Discussed changesets: 21) | ок commented 2025-12-23 15:33:12 UTC by fedoroff net ♦20 |
| 176300623 (Comments: 1) | kreidler-rider (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi kreidler Freund :) willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank zu vervollständigen. Kleiner Hinweis: Das Feld "name" ist bitte nur für echte Namen gedacht. Bei Spielplätzen steht dies... commented 2025-12-23 15:30:34 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 176313396 (Comments: 2) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 11) | De toegangsweg heb ik teruggezet als highway=service Gr eggie commented 2025-12-23 15:22:43 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176275611 (Comments: 1) | 3Loader3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13395673093/ Should the address be Devonshire Street, not Pine Street? Yeah, I know, Irish addresses. :) commented 2025-12-23 15:17:36 UTC by VictorIE ♦980 |
| 174131391 (Comments: 1) | esistderfred (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Kartierungskollege, könntest du dir diese Straße bitte nochmal ansehen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447068978 highway=road ?? Und du zeichnest sie direkt durch eine Wand? commented 2025-12-23 15:14:42 UTC by Sandal man ♦401 |
 | 176291246 (Comments: 1) | FrancisEmmanuelCalingo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, FrancisEmmanuelCalingo. I noticed that you added the population to some villages in Azores, but the values are not correct. Mind you that Wikipedia values are related to parishes (freguesias in Portugal), not places. Regards, A... commented 2025-12-23 14:56:14 UTC by AntMadeira ♦258 |
 | 176143503 (Comments: 3) | Ceyhansen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba @Ceyhansen , Hepsinin aynı işyeri olduğunu düşünmüştüm. Durum söylediğiniz gibi ise yapılması gereken başka bir işlem yok. Siz zaten eklemişsiniz. Açılış derken, OpenStreetMap kullanan b... commented 2025-12-23 14:53:46 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦191 |
| 176230887 (Comments: 1) | Simon Carmouze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.. They have to be mapped individually. Best regards commented 2025-12-23 14:53:44 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 175975709 (Comments: 1) | dikkeknodel (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hallo Zie mijn DM over dit project. Hier heb je o.a 2 gebouwen gemist die een node aan een weg hebben gekoppeld en 7 gebouwen met een layer=1 . (Meestal wordt de layer toegevoegd om een fout te verbergen. Goede toepassingen zijn oa. poorten waa... commented 2025-12-23 14:46:58 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176271647 (Comments: 1) | willsandy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, j'ai supprimé la boutique que vous avez ajouté car elle est fermée définitivement depuis plusieurs mois et car elle était déjà présente : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4656445... commented 2025-12-23 14:45:38 UTC by Syl ♦1,016 |
| 176180846 (Comments: 1) | evod (Discussed changesets: 23) | Was sagst dazu, die ganze highway=tertiary entlang der 18er-Verlängerung ab der Stadionbrücke herabzustufen? commented 2025-12-23 14:42:41 UTC by hlfan ♦83 |
| 176308992 (Comments: 1) | Vstromtour (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-23 14:27:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176271706 (Comments: 2) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hoi Wanderer, was bewust omdat ze anders niet gerenderd worden, heb je daar nog een oplossing voor? commented 2025-12-23 14:18:37 UTC by Taurus3 ♦10 |
| 138773113 (Comments: 1) | flatroy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, can you add also street name with house number to facilitate search? commented 2025-12-23 14:07:09 UTC by Sanniu ♦590 |
| 144969836 (Comments: 1) | Katz K (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, can you add also a street names with addresses to make it available to search? commented 2025-12-23 13:59:50 UTC by Sanniu ♦590 |
| 176188181 (Comments: 4) | LinusderLöscher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus LinusderLöscher, ich verstehe, warum der Waldbesitzer das gern so hätte, denn das Thema haben wir in der OSM öfter :) . Als Zusatzinfo: Die Ruine, der Weg und auch die Häuser unterhalb sind in der amtlichen basemap zu finde... commented 2025-12-23 13:49:10 UTC by Negreheb ♦309 |
| 176307734 (Comments: 1) | meongseolin (Discussed changesets: 44) | 南京地铁电气化情况 commented 2025-12-23 13:43:23 UTC by meongseolin ♦40 |
 | 175628745 (Comments: 2) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ok I will do so in future. commented 2025-12-23 13:33:50 UTC by ADHBEKB ♦1 |
 | 176298914 (Comments: 4) | AmukoEye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Оп... как-то видимо случайно. Вроде ранее за мной не наблюдалось. Спасибо вам! commented 2025-12-23 13:15:36 UTC by AmukoEye ♦1 |
| 176299212 (Comments: 2) | Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 178) | danke, erledigt commented 2025-12-23 13:13:38 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,171 |
| 176282750 (Comments: 2) | Phil2604 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Bien vu c’est une coquille de frappe que je viens de corriger. Merci de votre vigilance bienveillante. commented 2025-12-23 13:05:33 UTC by Phil2604 ♦2 |
 | 168558176 (Comments: 8) | JustACyclist (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks a lot! I will look into maybe reporting this to SC. commented 2025-12-23 12:52:50 UTC by JustACyclist ♦1 |
 | 176077194 (Comments: 2) | Saamat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, You may find it here: https://www.stat.gov.tm/population-census This is a page for the 2022 census and stats of Turkmen population in Turkmenistan. It's documents you have to download. The one the most important for us is the "... commented 2025-12-23 12:49:03 UTC by Saamat ♦1 |
| 176261454 (Comments: 6) | DerekvB (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dan gebruikt het Kadaster 088-nummers op een ongebruikelijke manier denk ik: https://www.kadaster.nl/over-ons/het-kadaster/contact/bezoekadressen Hier staan alle bezoekadressen met hun telefoonnummers. Alleen het hoofdkantoor De Grift Apeldoor... commented 2025-12-23 12:46:03 UTC by lipuma ♦178 |
 | 176290812 (Comments: 1) | Dwaze_TNP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, how & where can i edit this ? i contributed via the CoMaps app. Best Regards commented 2025-12-23 12:45:42 UTC by Dwaze_TNP ♦1 |
| 176216039 (Comments: 7) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 282) | Nie powinno być nigdzie unclassified, to jest porządna droga i stanowi objazd w razie zamknięcia S6. commented 2025-12-23 12:42:46 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦298 |
| 176304208 (Comments: 1) | LFSW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ваш редактор сейчас очень хорош, и я желаю вам всего наилучшего в будущем! commented 2025-12-23 12:26:06 UTC by Taksine ♦138 |
| 176275891 (Comments: 3) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Și scările merg spre mijlocul parcării în vest. Măcar folosește editorul tău, OpenStreetMap ar fi prima sursă cartografică care știe parcarea aceea corect! commented 2025-12-23 12:24:52 UTC by openstreetmapbuddy ♦2 |
| 176285979 (Comments: 1) | ornak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hej. W OSM nazwą drogi może być tylko oficjalna nazwa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic W przypadku nazw używanych przez lokalną ludność, można rozważyć życie tagu lo... commented 2025-12-23 12:13:15 UTC by SpinOff ♦348 |
| 143614107 (Comments: 4) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 197) | Jednak znalazłem: rzeczywiście to miała być szkoła, ale jest budynek jest w stanie surowym. Ma zostać przekształcony na mieszkania: https://bilgoraj.com.pl/pl/11_wiadomosci/37124_turobin-wynajem-mieszkan-w-przystepnych-cenach-spoleczna-inicjat... commented 2025-12-23 12:08:43 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦838 |
 | 176285779 (Comments: 3) | TheDJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | For reference to others, the OSM relation in question is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17973382 and discussion started at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17973382/history/6 commented 2025-12-23 11:58:54 UTC by TheDJ ♦1 |
| 176252478 (Comments: 5) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 31) | Ich vermute aber der Dr. google hat das auch aus Basemap und nicht vor Ort geprüft commented 2025-12-23 11:51:26 UTC by vikiawv ♦33 |
| 176297654 (Comments: 1) | lavasho (Discussed changesets: 2) | additional source: https://www.lechzuers.com/de/live-infos/strassenbericht commented 2025-12-23 11:51:16 UTC by lavasho ♦1 |
| 155610318 (Comments: 1) | Igorzo (Discussed changesets: 14) | i codici sentiero andrebbero sulle relation e non sulle way. Il commento "SOTA" non è informativo su quello che hai fatto. commented 2025-12-23 11:50:56 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
| 155610063 (Comments: 1) | Igorzo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Scusami, ma perché continui a mettere i nomi dei sentieri sulle way? Dovrebbero essere sulle relation. Inoltre commenti come "UUOUOUO" sono inappropriati, i commenti dovrebbero informare i mappatori su quello che hai fatto. commented 2025-12-23 11:47:17 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
| 176253894 (Comments: 1) | Kaissner (Discussed changesets: 5) | Okay but you didn't have to delete existing data and re-add a new element with the same geometry, you can simply retag them instead (talking about the grass patches). commented 2025-12-23 11:36:18 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦243 |
| 176301001 (Comments: 1) | akaryan (Discussed changesets: 6) | bollard=fixed regel verwijderd commented 2025-12-23 11:33:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176295836 (Comments: 3) | karolymaller (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-23 11:32:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176200765 (Comments: 3) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 44) | dlatego, że inny użytkownik zwrócił uwagę że zgodnie z wytycznymi OSM winno rozwijać się skróty commented 2025-12-23 10:54:11 UTC by Aight 2009 ♦15 |
| 166990430 (Comments: 4) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ha! Yeah, well, I'm all for tags and keys that are so self-documenting that you don't have to look anything up in the OSM wiki. Of course, people will say, "We've always done it this way," but since OSM is an ever-evolving pr... commented 2025-12-23 10:38:27 UTC by TheNightRider ♦37 |
| 174114411 (Comments: 1) | siddharta sanarelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, sto per cancellare le way tracciate in questo changeset. Per ferrovie proposte si intende opere finanziate e in progettazione avanzata. Purtroppo gli studi di fattibilità sono troppi rispetto a quanto poi si va a realizzare. Buon mapp... commented 2025-12-23 10:33:15 UTC by AwFi ♦45 |
| 176213938 (Comments: 1) | chamdam (Discussed changesets: 26) | c'est toi qui a remis le tracé du 38 par l'avenue de Serres ? Le hic c'est que la déviation est prolongée au delà du 4/01 commented 2025-12-23 10:32:57 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦122 |
 | 176298383 (Comments: 1) | Daniel ECD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Daniel ECD, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 36 building(s) Could you please confirm if ... commented 2025-12-23 10:29:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176297295 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dzięki za poprawę adresacji :) commented 2025-12-23 10:23:54 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦838 |
| 176292306 (Comments: 1) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | Wouldn't it be more efficient in this case to remove the availability times from the website and enter them in a readable format? Then the user wouldn't have to go to the trouble of frantically trying to find this information. commented 2025-12-23 10:15:41 UTC by the_third_man ♦14 |
| 176213035 (Comments: 1) | Fedorrr (Discussed changesets: 4) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-12-23 10:07:47 UTC by dypa ♦156 |
| 176275640 (Comments: 1) | DerSchmopf (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, hat sich der Hinweis damit erledigt ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4820198 Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-23 09:56:56 UTC by limes11 ♦979 |
| 175372570 (Comments: 5) | josepgomila6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reversió per esborrament d'informació https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176299469 commented 2025-12-23 09:56:52 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦242 |
| 175372646 (Comments: 1) | josepgomila6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reversió per esborrament d'informació https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176299469 commented 2025-12-23 09:56:52 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦242 |
| 175372622 (Comments: 1) | josepgomila6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reversió per esborrament d'informació https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176299469 commented 2025-12-23 09:56:52 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦242 |
| 175372677 (Comments: 1) | josepgomila6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reversió per esborrament d'informació https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176299469 commented 2025-12-23 09:56:52 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦242 |
| 176222429 (Comments: 1) | Lokai (Discussed changesets: 31) | Das dürfte die richtige Pos. sein (höchster pkt der Umgebung). Lt älteren TK25 Name korrekt. Ich hatte 2016 nur die ele korrigiert. Pos kam 2014 von user grungebass. commented 2025-12-23 09:52:31 UTC by FahRadler ♦123 |
| 176201713 (Comments: 3) | sm4rk0 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Назив је био на енглеском, па сам само превео на српски, али после сам видео званични назив на српском и грешком променио све осим једног. ... commented 2025-12-23 09:51:42 UTC by sm4rk0 ♦12 |
| 176237686 (Comments: 3) | Dirk Brouwer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt! Groeten, Dirk commented 2025-12-23 09:50:10 UTC by Dirk Brouwer ♦1 |
| 176298629 (Comments: 1) | ArchangelEkim (Discussed changesets: 14) | Note some of the opened intersections were confirmed from Aerial Drone Footage form this channel: https://www.youtube.com/@colindobson4045 commented 2025-12-23 09:38:12 UTC by ArchangelEkim ♦17 |
| 175815845 (Comments: 1) | marcoecaibo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Il tratto way/376083375 non è più da ripristinare, vedi Nota irrisolta #5004100 e Nota irrisolta #5004096, che senso ha mettere una nota "Sentiero pericoloso causa frana nel tratto compreso tra Via Faiedola e località Tazzol... commented 2025-12-23 09:36:30 UTC by Una tantum ♦21 |
| 176289094 (Comments: 1) | Vortexia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-23 09:25:57 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176297375 (Comments: 1) | MetroBot (Discussed changesets: 1) | 18号线和13号线在龙泽西的连接配线可能存在问题 commented 2025-12-23 09:20:57 UTC by MetroBot ♦8 |
| 176295651 (Comments: 1) | darabiderm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please move the node to a building and check the opening_hours value (only open on Monday?). commented 2025-12-23 09:10:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 175438889 (Comments: 3) | kalmika07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Parfait, merci pour la vidéo et la réponse rapide ! Je vais réorganiser un peu les chemins pour éviter que quelqu'un d'autre ne vienne redéplacer la piste cyclable. Bonne journée, Enzo commented 2025-12-23 09:02:01 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦12 |
| 176258742 (Comments: 2) | Andreeeee (Discussed changesets: 8) | @Dodko, zaujimave ze OSM nehlasil nejaky konflikt... Nevadi, hlavne ze je to tam :-) commented 2025-12-23 08:46:26 UTC by Andreeeee ♦14 |
| 175872030 (Comments: 1) | travaudat (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, I've noticed that you've been adding an "ID." prefix to the front of the bus stop ids. In the future, could you enter in only the numeric part to ensure it matches the GTFS data? This will help routing software match the OS... commented 2025-12-23 08:40:57 UTC by Unikitty ♦1 |
| 176296384 (Comments: 1) | WackyAapie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Please comment your edits properly. Some more observations? Greetz, eggie commented 2025-12-23 08:39:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176287483 (Comments: 4) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19202 commented 2025-12-23 08:30:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176288796 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:32 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176288485 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:32 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176289041 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:32 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176288668 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:32 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176290839 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:32 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176288601 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:32 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176287291 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176288050 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176288280 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176287882 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176287848 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176287806 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176287132 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176287267 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176287102 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176286036 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176285898 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176286514 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176286963 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176286755 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176284545 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176283350 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176283815 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176284811 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176285852 (Comments: 1) | dschug (Discussed changesets: 26) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071 commented 2025-12-23 08:24:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
 | 176293034 (Comments: 1) | qwer101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176295629 commented 2025-12-23 08:09:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 171659738 (Comments: 1) | laciucar (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zdravo laciucar, Samo da proverim da li je int_name na ovom nodu pogrešan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13129976961 Svi nazivi su "1903." samo je int_name "Franjo Sistek", pa pretpostavljam da je ... commented 2025-12-23 07:42:14 UTC by MaliMrav ♦68 |
| 125630763 (Comments: 2) | bernardo60 (Discussed changesets: 8) | I came across this way on a bike ride which was not on the map and I just rode along it for a few meters. I don't know where it continues. commented 2025-12-23 07:18:52 UTC by bernardo60 ♦66 |
| 176187727 (Comments: 2) | medurix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao dp7, mi sembrava di non aver rimosso alcuna traccia ma di averne creata una nuova non ancora mappata. Tuttavia grazie dell'indicazione, sicuramente la terrò a mente durante le prossime attività. Si, l'inserimento &egra... commented 2025-12-23 07:13:52 UTC by medurix ♦1 |
| 164057264 (Comments: 6) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please do not delete existing roads or elements on OSM and then redraw them from scratch. It is against good practices on OSM to do that. It's better to modify the existing roads and elements instead of deleting them! Please help preserve the hi... commented 2025-12-23 07:07:04 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
 | 176290834 (Comments: 1) | BigBlackPantheon (Discussed changesets: 2) | 1. Please don't trolltag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trolltag). Use `proposed:building=*`. 2. "Proposed Campus Extension of The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology at Clear Water Bay" is a `description=`, not a `... commented 2025-12-23 07:04:27 UTC by kingkingHK ♦52 |
| 176204208 (Comments: 1) | BigBlackPantheon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don't trolltag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trolltag). Use `proposed:building=*`. commented 2025-12-23 07:04:00 UTC by kingkingHK ♦52 |
| 176287570 (Comments: 1) | Seppiedupi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merged info with addressnode. Please use the present addressnode commented 2025-12-23 07:00:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176287759 (Comments: 1) | Seppiedupi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Hi please use the present addressnode gr eggie commented 2025-12-23 06:57:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176288125 (Comments: 1) | Seppiedupi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-23 06:56:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
 | 176248690 (Comments: 2) | genebeveridge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, I've reviewed the deletions and believe they are appropriate. commented 2025-12-23 06:53:20 UTC by genebeveridge ♦1 |
 | 176293221 (Comments: 1) | KbggTArgPUkyDCXz53wj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Note that the building is mixed_use and includes Oakridge Physio which is already present in OSM (and other businesses) at street level, but they have their own addresses. I'm not sure if it should be a single mixed user building with mul... commented 2025-12-23 06:37:18 UTC by KbggTArgPUkyDCXz53wj ♦1 |
| 176190253 (Comments: 1) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 175) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3634063943 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-12-23 05:46:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176274102 (Comments: 1) | Julian_1_2_3_4_5 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Guten Morgen! Diese Schranke versperrt dem Nachtnus n71 seinen Weg. Sicher kennst Du diese Gegend besser als ich. Ich kenne nur die Karte. Fehlt an der Schranke ein bus=yes weil der Bus sie öffnen kann? oder ist die Schranke ebenerdi... commented 2025-12-23 05:36:16 UTC by Senihtu ♦110 |
| 176291575 (Comments: 1) | 焱霁阳 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 勘误：武陵区-德山 commented 2025-12-23 05:13:54 UTC by 焱霁阳 ♦1 |
 | 164846616 (Comments: 2) | kenken234 (Discussed changesets: 20) | It has been confirmed by a member of Parliament that a bridge will be built across the canal https://www.facebook.com/share/1SLT2ba93z/ commented 2025-12-23 05:13:42 UTC by kenken234 ♦37 |
| 176117560 (Comments: 1) | Ed Kaiser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Yeah, all the media attention about Flock cameras recently has led to an influx of things mapped as ALPRs that really are just regular traffic cameras, or other non-surveillance infrastructure. Thank you for helping to clean that up! I... commented 2025-12-23 04:56:32 UTC by pwbriggs ♦109 |
| 176290497 (Comments: 2) | Eduardo17172 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Seleccionar y abrir en modo incognito para ver video commented 2025-12-23 04:16:18 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦5 |
 | 173187715 (Comments: 1) | ithianm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola ithianm Veo que estás mapeando en Colombia, y particularmente ríos, qué bien. Te quería decir que los ríos y quebradas si llegan a un lago, laguna o represa, el flujo (way en waterway) debe mostrar c&... commented 2025-12-23 03:40:48 UTC by AngocA ♦220 |
| 175552136 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hola Lolj Al mapear ríos, recuerda lo que te había dicho de hacerlo en el sentido del flujo del agua, hacia "agua abajo". Aquí te quedó hacia arriba https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456283176/history<... commented 2025-12-23 03:35:47 UTC by AngocA ♦220 |
| 174297250 (Comments: 1) | luisma1795 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola luisma1795 Veo que estás contribuyendo en Colombia, qué bien. Quería comentarte que el mapeo de ríos tiene que asegurar que no hay bucles y todos sus ramales bajan. Veo que hiciste un bucle en este https://www.... commented 2025-12-23 03:31:52 UTC by AngocA ♦220 |
| 173330296 (Comments: 1) | Haz_94 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Haz_94 I see you are mapping in Colombia, improving some rivers. However, you mapped a segment in the opposite direction to one river it already exists. Please make sure to download all the data when mapping in Tasking Manager. https:/... commented 2025-12-23 03:25:22 UTC by AngocA ♦220 |
| 176282025 (Comments: 3) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | As multiple mappers and myself have each reached out to this contributor multiple times on multiple of their changesets over the past month (including four days ago regarding a number of breaking changes to East/West AJ) the great majority of which h... commented 2025-12-23 03:24:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 176281215 (Comments: 3) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | As multiple mappers and myself have each reached out to this contributor multiple times on multiple of their changesets over the past month (including four days ago regarding a number of breaking changes to East/West AJ) the great majority of which h... commented 2025-12-23 03:24:14 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 176289055 (Comments: 1) | hd_scania (Discussed changesets: 62) | I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176289492 for the following reasons: 1. You have a history of messing with osm data in an attempt to fix a problem with your router. 2. Misunderstanding on how router... commented 2025-12-23 03:11:19 UTC by kingkingHK ♦52 |
| 176028326 (Comments: 1) | cas79 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi cas79, welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're glad to have you. In this changeset, you left the buildings not quite attached, but in the imagery it looks to me like the buildings are connected. If the buildings are physically connected on ... commented 2025-12-23 03:04:59 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦65 |
| 176023866 (Comments: 1) | Mapping Misfits (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Mapping Misfits, why did you add the traffic calming nodes along the crossing way instead of along the road way, when the hump affects vehicle traffic? commented 2025-12-23 03:00:06 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦65 |
| 176022948 (Comments: 1) | Mapping Misfits (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Mapping Misfits, why did you delete this driveway? It appears to have been mapped correctly. commented 2025-12-23 02:56:40 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦65 |
| 176264135 (Comments: 2) | awhchk (Discussed changesets: 3) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176289291 1. Vehicles from Kai Fuk Road westbound can not go to Shing Kai Road, so it should be kept as `=motorway_link`. 2. The extent of tunnel area is already conveyed with `motorroad=`. commented 2025-12-23 02:52:16 UTC by kingkingHK ♦52 |
 | 176247917 (Comments: 1) | P J D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). You have deleted a residential road. If it is based on your local knowledge, please do me... commented 2025-12-23 02:25:22 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦612 |
| 147941826 (Comments: 5) | km2bp (Discussed changesets: 226) | koment po 2 latach w sam raz! To drzewo to nie pomnik ;d Ale ma teraz pare innych pominiętych detali ;} commented 2025-12-23 02:19:20 UTC by Yog Sot ♦380 |
| 176286811 (Comments: 1) | moltes74 (Discussed changesets: 4) | C'est un peu dommage d'introduire un faux virage sur l'autoroute alors que le placement=right_of:1 permet justement de mapper simplement, d'avoir un bon rendu naïf, tout en étant précis. commented 2025-12-23 01:28:37 UTC by Marc Mongenet ♦30 |
 | 174131788 (Comments: 4) | Adventurize (Discussed changesets: 4) | You guys deleted ALL the old place nodes? How dare you! commented 2025-12-23 01:23:14 UTC by Tewuzij ♦28 |
| 175907242 (Comments: 1) | Aeuri (Discussed changesets: 5) | What makes these changes unsubstantiated? How a road serves in the local road network can be explained by its connectivity with destinations/other roads (its usage as an arterial, collector, etc.) and traffic counts. commented 2025-12-22 23:58:10 UTC by Joseph R P ♦390 |
| 176167083 (Comments: 4) | Comunicação Misericórdia Vila Franca de Xira (Discussed changesets: 1) | No Openstreetmap não podemos usar abreviaturas. Dr tem de ser Doutor, Eng tem de ser engenheiro, prof tem de ser professor. Não fazemos distinções entre licenciados, bachareis, doutorados ou professor catedrático. D... commented 2025-12-22 23:42:07 UTC by Ed_slv ♦5 |
| X | 174647646 (Comments: 2) | Łukasz Wasiak (Discussed changesets: 11) | This created problems in https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Åsunden,_Västergötland#Identitet please do not just remove stuff to deem obsolete without checking why it was created in the first place or just search on wikipedia... commented 2025-12-22 23:30:02 UTC by HuggeK ♦3 |
| 176285210 (Comments: 1) | Eijilazarus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you've added these as just name=Sump, what are these actually meant to be? The name tag is for signed names, not descriptive names. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/17628... commented 2025-12-22 23:18:22 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,445 |
| 158269974 (Comments: 1) | Torgau2020 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Who got the brilliant idea to remove the old relation which had a wikidata tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174647646 and not link it in this new one? commented 2025-12-22 23:09:04 UTC by HuggeK ♦3 |
| 176270527 (Comments: 1) | Alexandre148025 (Discussed changesets: 63) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité de deux itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2025-12-22 22:47:40 UTC by StC ♦385 |
| 176200700 (Comments: 1) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Opis zmian nic nie mówi. Nazwa jest błędna - akcent nad 'a' powinien być w drugą stronę. commented 2025-12-22 22:47:10 UTC by uprkos ♦80 |
| 140287878 (Comments: 3) | Nod5t5 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Danke. Ich habe jetzt versucht, das im Wiki besser zu erklären ( animal=horse_walker ). commented 2025-12-22 22:45:28 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦860 |
| 176230041 (Comments: 2) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ja bym prosił o napisanie PW do użytkownika. Jak to nie poskutkuje, to do DWG. Nie ma co się bawić w komentarze, jak użytkownik nas wszystkich zlewa. Wystarczy wam zabawy z kolejnym kontem, który bawi się w teoretyczne interpretacje stan... commented 2025-12-22 22:42:21 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦335 |
 | 173763951 (Comments: 5) | ODI76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tegnap megnéztem: még mindig Ág utca van a táblán. commented 2025-12-22 22:40:13 UTC by ODI76 ♦1 |
| 176121477 (Comments: 2) | DannyMcD (Discussed changesets: 91) | Hey Jarek, Thanks for the suggestions. I think an automated solution would be best for updating sidewalk:left/sidewalk:right/sidewalk:seperate, once all sidewalks have been added. Going from OSM sidewalk Geometry -> Tags is fairly easy, the d... commented 2025-12-22 22:35:35 UTC by DannyMcD ♦103 |
| 176236886 (Comments: 1) | Poparzony (Discussed changesets: 2) | To niezłe drzewa xD commented 2025-12-22 22:33:09 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176112693 (Comments: 2) | Wandergecko (Discussed changesets: 6) | Danke! Sorry wegen der Hausnummers. Soweit ich mich erinnere, war dasas durcheinander, 1x eine Markierung nur mit Nr und "ehemaligem Name" oder so im Hinterhaus, und das Vorderhaus mit Shop aber ohne Nr - ?? Sonst bin ich beim Lö... commented 2025-12-22 22:23:54 UTC by Wandergecko ♦4 |
| 176266560 (Comments: 1) | Losowy Pan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176284500 Nie dodajemy fikcji do map. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-22 22:18:05 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176276947 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 282) | Cześć, te note z głównego ciągu chyba można już usunąć commented 2025-12-22 22:14:39 UTC by stasiu512 ♦216 |
| 176216186 (Comments: 2) | awhchk (Discussed changesets: 3) | 2. The street naming isn't very useful, and it's quite unique to HK. `street:name=` should be enough for gazetted street, and `=motorway_link` can be named by interchanges. commented 2025-12-22 22:03:00 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,688 |
| 176233289 (Comments: 2) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 190) | Danke für den Hinweis! NEIN, das war keine Absicht, sorry Ich hoffe, ihn wieder hergestellt zu haben. commented 2025-12-22 22:01:29 UTC by Ropino ♦396 |
| 176254421 (Comments: 3) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 31) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5101808 commented 2025-12-22 21:59:31 UTC by vikiawv ♦33 |
| 176252259 (Comments: 3) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 31) | Falscher link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13394721417 commented 2025-12-22 21:53:47 UTC by vikiawv ♦33 |
| 176276477 (Comments: 1) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 89) | There's no camera in the middle of the roadway intersection. As such this edit reverted in full. commented 2025-12-22 21:49:03 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 175218318 (Comments: 24) | Dodko (Discussed changesets: 41) | Vyzera, ze OSRM, GraphHopper ani Valhalla, co su dostupne priamo z OSM, tie tagy nevedia spracovat. Ak to niektore routingy chapu tak ma zmysel tie tagy pouzivat. Na zvazenie je k akemu datum nastavovat podmienku. O 0:00 to nie je prejazdne, o 23:... commented 2025-12-22 21:28:22 UTC by mapko ♦110 |
| 176281636 (Comments: 1) | florijn11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi... Dit is oke.. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-22 21:27:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 172636979 (Comments: 4) | moltes74 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alors pour ce tronçon on est typiquement dans le cas de ma question, car il y a deux voies dans un sens et une dans l'autre, les deux sens étant séparés par une ligne blanche continue. Je vais modifier en adaptant la ... commented 2025-12-22 21:14:38 UTC by moltes74 ♦1 |
| 176282489 (Comments: 1) | pyspam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich habe leider aus versehen eine falsche Beschreibung von Changeset angegeben. Park + Kita wurde überarbeitet. Source: Ortskenntnis und Hamburg DK5 (HH LGV DK5 2025) commented 2025-12-22 21:13:17 UTC by pyspam ♦3 |
| 176281440 (Comments: 1) | florijn11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi Florijn.. Een motor_way... dat zal toch niet? Die tag haal ik even weg. Ik pas even wat aan. .. ook dat plantsoentje waar de weg splitst. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176281440 Groet, eggie commented 2025-12-22 21:10:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176269781 (Comments: 2) | Grimson (Discussed changesets: 6) | In deze layer rendert het bv wel. Dus niet te veel kijken naar alleen de standaardkaart https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176269781#map=19/53.327093/5.998573&layers=H commented 2025-12-22 21:02:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176268210 (Comments: 3) | Wilcooo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Het gebouw heb ik hersteld.. Zo staat het bij de BAG bekend. De onderdoorgang heb ik getagd met covered=yes layer=1 is niet nodig. Een buildin:part ook niet. Dar rendert niet op een kaart. Dat wordt gebruikt om de verschillende structuren (ver... commented 2025-12-22 20:57:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176280548 (Comments: 1) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 26) | pass bitte auf, ich glaube, du schrottest gerade Wanderrouten... z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17616034 knatschige Grüße... :( commented 2025-12-22 20:42:05 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,110 |
| 175802117 (Comments: 1) | Niiepce (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi Niiepce, warum ist office=research (d.h. Forschungsunternehmen oder -institut) hier unpassend, wenn dies ein Teil der Gebäude des Deutschen Krebsforschungszentrum ist? Evtl. wäre anstatt des unüblichen Tags building=... commented 2025-12-22 20:37:17 UTC by Steine42 ♦9 |
| 176280856 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 20) | Note I fixed power line mistake in next commit commented 2025-12-22 20:24:46 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 176278295 (Comments: 10) | Tom van Rijn (Discussed changesets: 4) | motor_vehicle=no heb ik verwijderd van het paaltje. Het zal per default niet routeren voor motorvoertuigen muv moped en mofa. Wanneer je motor_vehicle=no gaat taggen dan routeert het niet meer voor moped en mofa. Dat zijn immers motorvoertuigen... commented 2025-12-22 20:16:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 172154443 (Comments: 2) | cartomatto (Discussed changesets: 35) | Ciao ne abbiamo già parlato https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172119129#map=14/44.98172/7.31709 Come ha segnalato @ivanbranco nella wiki si dice che _il nome è il luogo di posa_ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI... commented 2025-12-22 20:13:58 UTC by cartomatto ♦32 |
| 173581770 (Comments: 1) | Zwiadowca21 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Te ulice nie mają nazw https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5100287 commented 2025-12-22 20:10:35 UTC by kubahahaha ♦420 |
| 176266449 (Comments: 3) | TrickyFoxy (Discussed changesets: 48) | думаю, да. это Трольвей или еще ктото старинные названия расставлял commented 2025-12-22 20:10:11 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| 176269589 (Comments: 1) | joe248 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi there :) the Hermes "post office": Is that located in the tea shop or the clothing shop? I ask because I believe there are no hermes operated places out there. Operator is nearly always some gas station oder shop and thus i... commented 2025-12-22 20:07:55 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 173800768 (Comments: 2) | Daniil Musatov (Discussed changesets: 11) | А вот тут вроде бы не задвоились, это разные объекты: рельефы с портретами учёных на уровне нескольких метров и декоративные статуи на кр... commented 2025-12-22 20:04:19 UTC by Daniil Musatov ♦17 |
| 176102125 (Comments: 2) | Angel Miklashevsky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Готово. commented 2025-12-22 20:03:56 UTC by Angel Miklashevsky ♦1 |
| 120721188 (Comments: 2) | Ibot123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Die kommen von der Nummernierung als dort Baustelle war und das ist 3 Jahre her. Ich habe es letztens bei den anderen ä gesehen als ich dort vorbei gewandert bin. commented 2025-12-22 20:03:36 UTC by Ibot123 ♦2 |
 | 175961982 (Comments: 6) | Open@2025 (Discussed changesets: 9) | What is your problem ? Who are you ? Are you mad 😡? Don't comment my changesets Okay commented 2025-12-22 20:02:28 UTC by Open@2025 ♦3 |
| 176241547 (Comments: 1) | benguuuuu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks. commented 2025-12-22 20:01:44 UTC by b-jazz ♦787 |
| 175893577 (Comments: 2) | helianthis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oops my bad! This is on the frontage road pointing in the south direction, right before the entrance to the complex i believe. commented 2025-12-22 20:01:15 UTC by helianthis ♦1 |
| 175001539 (Comments: 2) | Daniil Musatov (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ладно, убедили - буду ставить пробелы (уже начал). commented 2025-12-22 19:59:25 UTC by Daniil Musatov ♦17 |
| 176258534 (Comments: 1) | MieszkoWita (Discussed changesets: 1) | zrobiłeś błędy, nie rozwiązałeś ostrzeżeń przed zapisem. Naprawiłem to w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176279886 Zacznij wykonywać swoje zmiany na mniejszym obszarze i częściej zapisuj. commented 2025-12-22 19:56:55 UTC by Yog Sot ♦380 |
| 176024761 (Comments: 3) | VLD322 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello Logan, No problem - and thanks for getting back to me. commented 2025-12-22 19:50:08 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 154013579 (Comments: 1) | avitrano (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3993336 was still open, I've closed it for you ;-) commented 2025-12-22 19:48:01 UTC by rohieb ♦135 |
| 176278551 (Comments: 1) | nicola_yubo (Discussed changesets: 3) | attento che la direzione delle panchine è in gradi, non in sedicesimi, hai modo di correggere? commented 2025-12-22 19:47:16 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦35 |
| 174678757 (Comments: 2) | Daniil Musatov (Discussed changesets: 11) | Похоже, часть правок из Every Door продублировалась, точки задвоились, а эти ещё и не к той линии прицепились. Сейчас постараюсь исправить, ту... commented 2025-12-22 19:43:51 UTC by Daniil Musatov ♦17 |
| 176244790 (Comments: 1) | Daria99z (Discussed changesets: 1) | и зачем вы поверх дороги еще одну нарисовали? откат commented 2025-12-22 19:43:02 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| 176274950 (Comments: 3) | Mani NJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi - Thanks for the feedback. I am good as long as the road is marked to prohibit public access. My intent is not vandalism but to protect my family from unexpected / unauthorized delivery trucks running through my private driveway causing grave dang... commented 2025-12-22 19:31:15 UTC by Mani NJ ♦1 |
 | 176232973 (Comments: 3) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 30) | Izskatās, ka redaktorā tulkojums latviski lietots ar "bruģis" = `sett` un ar "bruģakmens" = `paving_stones`. Tas gan nav pareizs tulkojums vai vismaz ļoti mulsinošs. (Tīri precīzi "bruģis" ir ceļa seguma ... commented 2025-12-22 19:24:13 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 176278473 (Comments: 1) | Kaushik_US (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello again, sock puppet accounts are not allowed on OSM. Also knowingly misusing the tagging system, removing the feature type, and incorrectly using the name tags considered vandalism. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism Inf... commented 2025-12-22 19:24:08 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 176061075 (Comments: 2) | LakeNumto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi BrackoNe, In order to keep this discussion in one thread, the issues in this changeset have been addressed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176062528. Thanks! commented 2025-12-22 19:23:16 UTC by LakeNumto ♦2 |
| 176060375 (Comments: 2) | VolgaRiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi BrackoNe, In order to keep this discussion in one thread, the issues in this changeset have been addressed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176062528. Thanks! commented 2025-12-22 19:21:32 UTC by VolgaRiver ♦1 |
| 176052847 (Comments: 2) | CanterburyPlain (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi BrackoNe, In order to keep this discussion in one thread, the issues in this changeset have been addressed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176062528. Thanks! commented 2025-12-22 19:20:13 UTC by CanterburyPlain ♦2 |
| 176277540 (Comments: 5) | Tom van Rijn (Discussed changesets: 4) | De bebouwde kom doet het ook weer. :) Paar keer ctrl f5 voor het effect commented 2025-12-22 19:19:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176054871 (Comments: 2) | LakeNumto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi BrackoNe, In order to keep this discussion in one thread, the issues in this changeset have been addressed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176062528. Thanks! commented 2025-12-22 19:18:51 UTC by LakeNumto ♦2 |
| 176089713 (Comments: 2) | CanterburyPlain (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi BrackoNe, In order to keep this discussion in one thread, the issues in this changeset have been addressed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176062528. Thanks! commented 2025-12-22 19:17:48 UTC by CanterburyPlain ♦2 |
| 176025950 (Comments: 2) | VLD323 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello rskedgell, thank you for bringing these to our attention. While reviewing this changeset, we noticed that separate sidewalks were added along residential roads which, to our understanding, is not preferable to the London mapping community. I&rs... commented 2025-12-22 19:16:59 UTC by VLD282 ♦7 |
| 175779715 (Comments: 3) | N9713 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Alles klar, danke fürs Melden. :) commented 2025-12-22 19:04:14 UTC by chris66 ♦433 |
| 176158152 (Comments: 2) | amakarevich_lyft (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Udarian, My name is Artem, and I'm the OSM Policy Lead at Lyft. Thanks for bringing this up. It looks like something is broken in preview mode. Please try using this link with preview: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?panel... commented 2025-12-22 19:01:55 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦28 |
| 176275806 (Comments: 1) | daviddavidd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Zou het pand ook geen adres meer hebben? Het adres heb ik voorlopig hersteld. MVG, Eggie Namens d... commented 2025-12-22 18:56:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176228148 (Comments: 2) | Interteutones (Discussed changesets: 83) | Hallo, ob da ein Bus verkehrt kann ich nicht sagen. Sollte nun wieder befahrbar sein. commented 2025-12-22 18:54:57 UTC by Interteutones ♦51 |
| 176269380 (Comments: 1) | VlIvYur (Discussed changesets: 58) | rv wrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13279188501 - it can be clearly seen in aerial imagery, if you use https://nt0.napr.gov.ge/NGCache?x={x}&y={y}&z={z}&l=ORTHO_GEORGIA_4 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176277845 commented 2025-12-22 18:54:31 UTC by yelisey90 ♦219 |
| 166529354 (Comments: 1) | Chizevefhlen (Discussed changesets: 4) | I've changed these back from farmland to meadow, as I surveyed here just a month before your changes and these were all very clearly meadows, and are visible as meadows on aerial imagery too. Unless you have information about a change of landuse... commented 2025-12-22 18:52:19 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦152 |
| 175264098 (Comments: 4) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 15) | That makes sense! Yeah like in the diary piece from the changeset comment, I think painted centerlines are generally a good metric in CA, because the standard is to add one if the road gets a certain level of traffic. But they tend to be less good in... commented 2025-12-22 18:44:31 UTC by willkmis ♦193 |
| 89056957 (Comments: 3) | Arctic gnome (Discussed changesets: 54) | "Western/Northern Mature Area" also struck me as odd, and I recall a few years back, digging through the city's website for any mention of those names but not finding any. And I recall mentioning it, but not going further because it&#... commented 2025-12-22 18:36:52 UTC by Viajero Perdido ♦246 |
| 176104912 (Comments: 5) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 40) | Merci beaucoup Marc. Effectivement, c'était une belle erreur de ma part de penser que j'allais pouvoir mettre à jour toutes les lignes en une seule fois, mais devoir découper les routes pour coller aux trajets ligne ... commented 2025-12-22 18:33:29 UTC by Lisapple ♦56 |
| 176275703 (Comments: 1) | ppeb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! This looks good to me. Thanks for your contribution and for following the correct opening hours and phone formats. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... commented 2025-12-22 18:32:52 UTC by schobbish ♦15 |
| 171644976 (Comments: 8) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good. commented 2025-12-22 18:32:01 UTC by fghj753 ♦63 |
| 176248460 (Comments: 1) | Airat Giliazov (Discussed changesets: 2) | У терминалов не бывает названий. commented 2025-12-22 18:29:06 UTC by Глеб ♦144 |
| 175981884 (Comments: 1) | timretout (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it would be preferable if buildings were not imported from mapwithai / microsoft buildingfootprints when they still need to be split further - for example semidetached and terraced houses as is the case here. Thanks. commented 2025-12-22 18:24:31 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦152 |
| 94789599 (Comments: 1) | Urednik2020 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Здраво-живо Уредниче! Само да проверим да ли се ова улица стварно зове Пролетарска, или је то штампарска грешка? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88496230<... commented 2025-12-22 18:09:39 UTC by sm4rk0 ♦12 |
| 176269661 (Comments: 3) | mindedie (Discussed changesets: 10) | Taip, viskam galioja. Mažiems keliukams, kur reikia simbolizacijai, arba braižant, arba skaičiuojant dedamas automatinis buferis, pačių geometrijų dalinti/skaidyti nereikia. Laukas ar ortofoto metais dirbtas (todėl panašus į farmland),... commented 2025-12-22 18:06:01 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,010 |
| 176258669 (Comments: 2) | AnnaYushkevich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Udarian. Yes, you're right about the building levels (it is 49). I believe there are other businesses there as well. If you have more information about them, please feel free to add them. Thank you so much! Best regards, Anna commented 2025-12-22 17:54:22 UTC by AnnaYushkevich ♦1 |
| 176275544 (Comments: 1) | miledda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sur le rendu de cette carte, une erreur apparait au-dessus de l'église (la "Stretta di a Ghjesgia" coupe le "Traversa di Zevacu" et remonte sur 100 ou 200 m avant de revenir à son point de départ. Cette e... commented 2025-12-22 17:52:48 UTC by miledda ♦1 |
| 146667590 (Comments: 3) | ASMapper (Discussed changesets: 10) | It seems this object was recently deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173765029 If you have any contributions as to why this object should or shouldn't be restored, please comment there. commented 2025-12-22 17:39:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176263793 (Comments: 1) | injuryattorneyfla1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | A few comments about this changeset: - Next time please leave a changeset comment that better describes what you did in the changeset, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments - this changeset also adds du... commented 2025-12-22 17:34:29 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176254732 (Comments: 1) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 184) | lines is deprecated, changed it to route_ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lines commented 2025-12-22 17:32:58 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,995 |
| 176274091 (Comments: 1) | Samuel4200 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Please note that cameras should be placed exactly where they physically are, by looking at the satellite imagery. Additionally, are you are that this is actually "Flock Safety" brand camera and not some other? commented 2025-12-22 17:21:46 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 154501592 (Comments: 2) | Fraetech (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Oui il s'agit d'un chemin au niveau du sol environnant, entouré de deux talus. N'hésitez pas à faire les corrections nécessaires ! Bonne soirée, Fraetech commented 2025-12-22 17:14:58 UTC by Fraetech ♦3 |
| 172907217 (Comments: 1) | Martaietn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Please note that "address=" is NOT a valid OSM tag. Invalid data must be corrected. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172907217 ... commented 2025-12-22 17:07:46 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 175159647 (Comments: 1) | Martaietn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. It looks like the phone number you entered is invalid. It doesn't have all the digits. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175159647 ... commented 2025-12-22 17:04:43 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 176246667 (Comments: 1) | Martaietn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Please note that location description must not be stuffed into the name= tag. We have branch= tag for that. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1762466... commented 2025-12-22 17:01:56 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
 | 176215160 (Comments: 2) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 43) | I will definitely consider. Thank you. commented 2025-12-22 16:44:05 UTC by Jobigutenburg ♦15 |
| 173292082 (Comments: 5) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | I have reverted this changeset for now. I ask Sheikh Salah to first start a forum discussion before making widespread changes to highly contentious objects around Israel. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176272534 commented 2025-12-22 16:42:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176235728 (Comments: 1) | dluppus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just as a tip: The buildings you've added have a rather irregular shape which isn't well seen on OSM since they are IRL more rectangular (this building is particularly egregious since you've left a cutting into the building, something ... commented 2025-12-22 16:41:08 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦243 |
| 175559804 (Comments: 2) | MFS93 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the feedback - I will be more diligent with this in the future. commented 2025-12-22 16:38:31 UTC by MFS93 ♦1 |
| 175414183 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 175414129 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 175413846 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 175414004 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 175413687 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 175413949 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 175170599 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 175413693 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 173291901 (Comments: 1) | Sheikh Salah (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486 commented 2025-12-22 16:17:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
 | 176227410 (Comments: 1) | LambariGaba (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted for possible vandalism commented 2025-12-22 16:13:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,663 |
| 176270903 (Comments: 1) | OrchidA (Discussed changesets: 7) | Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery. commented 2025-12-22 16:06:31 UTC by OrchidA ♦7 |
| 176040612 (Comments: 6) | Filippo Arnaldi (Discussed changesets: 3) | I agree that a revert is the proper way to proceed. commented 2025-12-22 16:05:46 UTC by mueschel ♦6,771 |
| 116670693 (Comments: 5) | Wulz (Discussed changesets: 15) | I'd just like to remove the trails that aren't marked on the ground. The Alpe Adria Trails are all marked on the ground. The JKAT trails are also marked on the ground, or at least the CAI will mark them. These are the JKAT trails that the C... commented 2025-12-22 16:03:14 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
| 176268505 (Comments: 1) | Itomic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you added several tags here that shouldn't be in OSM, e.g. "source:maxspeed:named_numbered" or "source:maxspeed:app" Could you check and fix this? commented 2025-12-22 16:00:34 UTC by mueschel ♦6,771 |
 | 140856198 (Comments: 1) | traveleditor (Discussed changesets: 50) | سلام اینجا اسمش چاچکام هست نه رودبار نقیب ده متاسفانه این اسم به اشتباه ثبت شده commented 2025-12-22 15:53:39 UTC by rafigh_je ♦1 |
| 174867518 (Comments: 2) | vrg (Discussed changesets: 20) | Chciałbym prosić o nie przyklejanie obszarów do dróg. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mania-sklejania-obszarow-z-drogami/76563 commented 2025-12-22 15:44:28 UTC by olo81 ♦696 |
| 176237587 (Comments: 2) | kamlukasz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Na terenie nic się nie dzieje. Brak jakichkolwiek oznaczeń, tabliczek, informacji na budynku i terenie, że to jednostka wojskowa. Budynek wygląda na pusty. commented 2025-12-22 15:38:06 UTC by kamlukasz ♦1 |
| 164333391 (Comments: 2) | ghostrider44 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo wuff57, nachdem im Forum über Sinn und Unsinn solcher Streckenrelationen bzw. auch anderen Routen diskutiert wurde und man nach einer zutreffenden Gliederung suchte, war ich auch der Meinung, dass einige von mir angelegte bzw. in meinem... commented 2025-12-22 15:27:20 UTC by ghostrider44 ♦68 |
| 176262799 (Comments: 1) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | According to the description, the defibrillator is in the office. Is the office really accessible to everyone in the building from 8 am to 11 pm? Or should access be set to private? The office could be locked and therefore inaccessible. commented 2025-12-22 15:25:28 UTC by the_third_man ♦14 |
| 124822643 (Comments: 1) | Naphi (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, selon https://www.baiedequiberon.bzh/napoleon-express-le-train-touristique-entre-auray-et-pontivy, et c'est logique, le train ne part par en dehors d'une gare mais de la gare d'Auray... ou de Lambel-Carmors de https://www.gar-... commented 2025-12-22 15:19:44 UTC by trial ♦1,005 |
| 176266626 (Comments: 1) | eyw27 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Por favor, no cambie la jerarquía viaria sin consultar antes la información disponible en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%A1laga#Road_hierarchy. Hace algún tiempo se hizo un esfuerzo por pone... commented 2025-12-22 15:18:23 UTC by dcapillae ♦385 |
| 176256041 (Comments: 1) | evkalina (Discussed changesets: 17) | Revertido changeset por eliminar nodo estadístico, borrando su historial https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176268800 commented 2025-12-22 15:17:28 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦242 |
| 175359662 (Comments: 1) | CHS5290 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. We welcome you as new mapper. We cannot expect that your mappings will be in line with the HOTOSM quality standards. But you made some serious issues. Clustered buildings and tag it as 1 building. Inaccurate mappe... commented 2025-12-22 15:11:58 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176265926 (Comments: 1) | NielsH80 (Discussed changesets: 3) | warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway \t1 komt omdat je trottoir niet aan de rijbaan vastzat. Opgelost. Tip Je zou ook nog kunnen kijken of die noexit=yes op die toegangsweg langs de brandweerkazerne nog klopt. Wellicht kun je nu met de fiet... commented 2025-12-22 15:03:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175954109 (Comments: 1) | Anton Cheloshkin (Discussed changesets: 7) | Здравствуйте! По данным обьективного контроля, на 21 декабря, дорога ещё НЕ открыта и достраивается. Пожалуйста, не надо открывать дор... commented 2025-12-22 15:02:18 UTC by Константин Гам ♦747 |
| 92059329 (Comments: 2) | Grola (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bonjour, je te remercie pour ton message mais ne retrouve pas ma source... Heureuses fêtes de fin d'année. commented 2025-12-22 14:58:36 UTC by Grola ♦4 |
| 176251341 (Comments: 11) | NielsH80 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Het is in ieder geval oké zo. Mapse eggie commented 2025-12-22 14:56:21 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176267405 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 224) | #kaart 2025 commented 2025-12-22 14:53:06 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 176267282 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 224) | #kaart 2025 commented 2025-12-22 14:52:53 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 173352847 (Comments: 6) | MarcieLLo-KR (Discussed changesets: 4) | OK - zrozumiałem i będę tak robić w przyszłości. commented 2025-12-22 14:47:05 UTC by MarcieLLo-KR ♦4 |
| 176262020 (Comments: 2) | MarcieLLo-KR (Discussed changesets: 4) | OK - zrozumiałem i będę tak robić w przyszłości. commented 2025-12-22 14:46:21 UTC by MarcieLLo-KR ♦4 |
 | 176265977 (Comments: 2) | Diez Cañones (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, Has borrado https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9520125/history. ¿Fue intencional? Atentamente, Andy commented 2025-12-22 14:44:43 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,591 |
| 176261863 (Comments: 2) | ISAIASLIMA (Discussed changesets: 2) | O mesmo vale para tag access=no commented 2025-12-22 14:39:45 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,193 |
| 161393950 (Comments: 3) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 27) | Danke! Habe den Rest korrigiert. Denke, es ist jetzt so in Ordnung. commented 2025-12-22 14:35:31 UTC by BB-plan ♦10 |
| 176210840 (Comments: 2) | StantonPfarri25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Genau aus diesem Grund habe ich es ja auch zu einer Relation mit allen Infos (from, to, via) zusammengefasst) commented 2025-12-22 14:34:01 UTC by fs_LT ♦112 |
| 176191309 (Comments: 3) | Crohns (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank for the reply! yah Its not really made clear to new users, but OSM uses the tagging system rather then removing data. So if something exist on the ground even if its private/informal/illegal/unauthorized it should still remain in the OSM databa... commented 2025-12-22 14:33:14 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 152315348 (Comments: 1) | rafastryk (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-22 14:23:00 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176259984 (Comments: 1) | rafastryk (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-22 14:22:44 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 170992870 (Comments: 1) | Kochbunker (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-22 14:20:49 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176262115 (Comments: 1) | Kochbunker (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-22 14:20:37 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176263609 (Comments: 1) | Heiner Einer (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-12-22 14:19:31 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176265402 (Comments: 1) | KAMAROKRP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie używaj samych wielkich liter do opisu adresów, obiektów itp. commented 2025-12-22 14:13:21 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 169369877 (Comments: 1) | Yorvik Prestigitator (Discussed changesets: 88) | Whats the diffence between amenity=townhall and amenity=community_centre+community_centre=village_hall? commented 2025-12-22 14:12:25 UTC by CjMalone ♦236 |
| 176264077 (Comments: 2) | mchagascouto (Discussed changesets: 1) | My deletions were intentional commented 2025-12-22 14:09:38 UTC by mchagascouto ♦1 |
 | 176265070 (Comments: 1) | Enock4seth (Discussed changesets: 24) | Oop!! I hit "Enter" instead of "Shift" Deleted non-existing roads, removed assumed maxspeed=30 from roads commented 2025-12-22 14:04:17 UTC by Enock4seth ♦589 |
| 176160900 (Comments: 1) | Hasiowaty (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-12-22 14:01:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176226862 (Comments: 2) | schermpeter (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ok, bedankt. commented 2025-12-22 13:57:43 UTC by schermpeter ♦2 |
| 176142709 (Comments: 4) | Michel SIS 04 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Très bien c'est noté. Merci pour ces informations. commented 2025-12-22 13:51:22 UTC by Michel SIS 04 ♦2 |
| 152935714 (Comments: 1) | Fuffy Beer (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978580063 – this way is for protected area boundary[1], as indicated by tags for the parent relation, and protected area boundary is not coincident with landuse/park boundary. So I'll restore it. Us... commented 2025-12-22 13:50:17 UTC by Pikse ♦224 |
| 176067309 (Comments: 1) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hi, could you check these edits? "psv=no" contradicts "oneway:bus=no". commented 2025-12-22 13:49:32 UTC by mueschel ♦6,771 |
| 174391574 (Comments: 2) | jVF5nUXy6w (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi @Duja! This name is on a sign leading to it and at the very top with the signature "Acin Cot 503 m" commented 2025-12-22 13:37:30 UTC by jVF5nUXy6w ♦2 |
| 176263883 (Comments: 1) | unen (Discussed changesets: 4) | December 2025 :) commented 2025-12-22 13:34:14 UTC by unen ♦23 |
| 170997403 (Comments: 1) | osmann (Discussed changesets: 7) | Salut, Je crois que c'est toi qui a ajouté la pente à ces ways. Mesurée comment ? 6 % ça me parait beaucoup. A mon avis (à vue d'oeil, confirmé par geoportail pour le 1er way cité) c'... commented 2025-12-22 13:33:51 UTC by josmougn ♦245 |
| 176155413 (Comments: 1) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 104) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13389469602 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-12-22 13:23:42 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176251374 (Comments: 3) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 55) | Tak wiem, ale Pan Admin światowy coś zwleka z zablokowaniem tego konta i kazał najpierw pisać mu komentarze z pytaniami pod wątpliwymi zmianami commented 2025-12-22 13:14:33 UTC by snikers89 ♦16 |
| 175668029 (Comments: 1) | Slayerok1927 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Доброго дня! Дякую за уточнення карти. Хочу зазначити, що згідно правил номера будинків з літерами пишуться через дефіс, наприклад 18-А, 2... commented 2025-12-22 13:09:21 UTC by neviksasha ♦5 |
 | 175692818 (Comments: 1) | Dankos (Discussed changesets: 3) | But, these are no official maps, mate. I think it would be useful to add the Arabic name for this country; because this language is well-known there. Also, do you know that many places names in this country has origins from Arabic language and others... commented 2025-12-22 12:48:24 UTC by Ahmed500000 ♦11 |
| 148254595 (Comments: 1) | worker12 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Worker, laut https://www.kematenintirol.at/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Gemeindezeitung-98.pdf geht hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35373148 seit dem Frühjahr ein neuer Radweg durch. Du hast dort ein Radfahrverbot erfasst. Ist ... commented 2025-12-22 12:34:43 UTC by Hungerburg ♦415 |
| 174208516 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3829) | Could you revert this changeset? The discussion with the IT community is clear. These relations must be deleted commented 2025-12-22 12:27:09 UTC by Cortix ♦20 |
| 176191680 (Comments: 1) | IDGU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi IDGU, welcome to OSM. Note that streets do not need address tags (addr:city, addr:street, addr:*). Adding just the name, if known, is enough. commented 2025-12-22 12:22:27 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦115 |
 | 176250853 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 12) | I removed some of the names you added with this changeset, because in fact they are descriptive names. Please, if you cannot check the meaning of the inscription on time, just leave it unsigned(and this quest uncompleted) for another mapper. http... commented 2025-12-22 12:18:57 UTC by Fraxi ♦205 |
| 176250431 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 12) | You might not be a Bulgarian, but I'd like to note some issues on this changeset: -you named https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12919157490 as "Акумпатори". May be you have seen on a sign "Акумулатори"... commented 2025-12-22 12:14:52 UTC by Fraxi ♦205 |
 | 175228542 (Comments: 1) | にふぇーでびるんるん (Discussed changesets: 1) | The roads around OIST parking building are not one-way. (Ways: 1454368836 and 443247096) commented 2025-12-22 12:13:23 UTC by pinetree29 ♦1 |
| 175587719 (Comments: 1) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hallo Thomas, ich habe vor einiger Zeit diese Relation angelegt als die ersten Wege legalisiert wurden. Danach habe ich weitere Wege ergänzt. Deine Idee, die Relation zu entfernen und Wege als bicycle=yes zu kennzeichnen finde ich gut. A... commented 2025-12-22 12:09:43 UTC by _torsten_ ♦100 |
| 176251116 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 55) | Jakie jest źródło tych zmian? W tym miejscu nie ma przystanków autobusowych. commented 2025-12-22 12:07:05 UTC by snikers89 ♦16 |
| 176251160 (Comments: 1) | yumeshiro (Discussed changesets: 55) | Jakie jest źródło tych zmian? W tym miejscu nie ma przystanków autobusowych. commented 2025-12-22 12:06:03 UTC by snikers89 ♦16 |
| 176249594 (Comments: 1) | kabir-ih (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, for the name updates that you're applying can you please be sure to add the name of source? Typically, this would be added for other mappers to understand the history of the object. commented 2025-12-22 12:03:34 UTC by Mapiate ♦35 |
| 176257574 (Comments: 3) | Chiel van de Logt (Discussed changesets: 4) | No problem... Bedankt voor je reactie. Het zal zo routeren in LiveNav. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-22 11:58:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 117981069 (Comments: 4) | famosm (Discussed changesets: 16) | Es gibt Schlüssel, bei denen eine Doppelpunktvariante populärer ist, aber level gehört nicht dazu: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/level/indoor:level Und es ist auch kein Trend zu erkennen, dass sich das ändern w&u... commented 2025-12-22 11:54:42 UTC by Tordanik ♦8 |
| 175434034 (Comments: 17) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 25) | 1. If there's not a signposted or official extent, it should not be added 2. I don't understand what your "x in/at/on/of y" is referring to commented 2025-12-22 11:52:52 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,688 |
| 175833632 (Comments: 1) | Ironforester (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, ist hier noch gesperrt? Die Brücke wurde ja freigegeben. commented 2025-12-22 11:47:25 UTC by chris66 ♦433 |
| 176122203 (Comments: 2) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yeah I changed it back. commented 2025-12-22 11:43:28 UTC by thebeastmodo1 ♦4 |
 | 176246939 (Comments: 1) | colty45 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 請注意勿把路徑和行政區界線、河川等相連 commented 2025-12-22 11:36:55 UTC by catdreamer ♦139 |
| 176001456 (Comments: 1) | ITBeyond-Michelle (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi ITBeyond-Michelle, These roads remain in situe and were set to access = No so I would like to revert your changeset please as it appears to have caused other osmose issues. The exclusion zone shows that you are not permitted and there is signific... commented 2025-12-22 11:35:16 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦420 |
| 176203297 (Comments: 1) | MapMenMan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117076477/history 1. The road is tagged with sidewalk=left. Be careful of such tags when adding footways. 2. The end node of the roadway needs to tagged noexit=yes or join with the footway to avo... commented 2025-12-22 11:21:46 UTC by VictorIE ♦980 |
| 173880741 (Comments: 1) | Marting77 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Every single change in this changeset is a degradation of what was there before. Private roads converted to residential roads, driveways added where they don't actually exist. Roads deleted then re-added in less accurate positions. This needs... commented 2025-12-22 11:15:44 UTC by ChrisCopsey ♦1 |
 | 176082371 (Comments: 1) | One Use (Discussed changesets: 1) | Καλησπέρα, καλώς ήρθατε στο OpenStreetMap και να είστε καλά ... commented 2025-12-22 11:13:14 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦132 |
| 176238437 (Comments: 10) | RuleVR (Discussed changesets: 3) | Editen.. volgens mij alleen simpele zaken.. bv een winkel toevoegen e.d. commented 2025-12-22 11:08:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 75295228 (Comments: 1) | de vries (Discussed changesets: 49) | Dag de vries, In Barneveld zijn achter de Wesselseweg 63 een tweetal gebouwen met elkaar verkoopt geraakt. Kun je daar nog even naar kijken. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.62212&lat=52.14955&zoom=19&... commented 2025-12-22 11:00:30 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,404 |
| 175800917 (Comments: 1) | KarlaIbrahić (Discussed changesets: 16) | The roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176257286 commented 2025-12-22 10:58:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦212 |
| 176254052 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ai facut harta asta swaiter. Lasi toate strazile neconectate. Daca nu te opresti sau schimbi editorul , te vor opri cei de la Data Working Group. Ignori in continuare s apui comentarii. Ignori sfaturile pe care ti l-em dat. Aici nu esti la tine acasa... commented 2025-12-22 10:56:58 UTC by rarad74 ♦335 |
| 176243142 (Comments: 1) | BenjaminDemaille (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Benjamin, La rue de Coulmiers est bien une zone de rencontre. Pourquoi avoir modifié les attributs ? Je corrige. Bonne continuation Benoît commented 2025-12-22 10:54:47 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦199 |
| 176047990 (Comments: 3) | SIG_Ville_Anglet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci, pour vos corrections. Je vois vos messages que maintenant. Bonne journée. commented 2025-12-22 10:50:44 UTC by SIG_Ville_Anglet ♦1 |
| 176126772 (Comments: 2) | _dsm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, Udarian, Thanks for clarifying, I’ll consider this info next time! Best, _dsm commented 2025-12-22 10:41:51 UTC by _dsm ♦6 |
| 175749168 (Comments: 1) | hegau-hiker (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457427371 hattest du ohne highway-Wert erfasst. Ich habe ihm ein hw=path spendiert. Im Luftbild ist davon nicht viel zu sehen. Führt der E1 hier tatsächlich so wie von dir einge... commented 2025-12-22 10:31:22 UTC by limes11 ♦979 |
| 175174704 (Comments: 1) | Relics (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Relics, and thank you for your contributions. How does one review a changeset as large as this one? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175174704 commented 2025-12-22 10:26:48 UTC by thompsondt ♦4 |
| 175402422 (Comments: 1) | CeliaCandebat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not cluster multiple buildings and tag them as 1 building. Best regards commented 2025-12-22 10:09:59 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 161953137 (Comments: 1) | Mattgt933 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12544612552#map=19/61.803917/-147.961001 Is "Loading Bay" really its name? Or is it a description? Also you are using landuse on a node which is highly uncommon. It should be used on a way. commented 2025-12-22 10:08:33 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,829 |
| 176244773 (Comments: 1) | Char_Vad (Discussed changesets: 2) | Are you sure about the access tags here, which have the effect that no transport mode is permitted (including pedestrians and cyclists) and also (redundantly) no motor vehicle is permitted? The Mapillary imagery from 2023-06 would suggest the ... commented 2025-12-22 10:08:18 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 176254339 (Comments: 1) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 142) | Änderungssatz Kommentar Korrektur: Naturschutzgebiet " Piepenbruchsiepen" eingepflegt commented 2025-12-22 10:05:21 UTC by surveyor54 ♦665 |
| 176093624 (Comments: 1) | NTTrailsLSE (Discussed changesets: 27) | Please check https://osm.org/note/5100860 commented 2025-12-22 09:53:34 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦374 |
| 176248352 (Comments: 1) | Airat Giliazov (Discussed changesets: 2) | Он не отсутствовал, просто был не совсем верно обозначен - не в фактическом месте, а в торце этого дома со стороны ул. Сибгата Хакима. Л... commented 2025-12-22 09:45:18 UTC by fndoder ♦106 |
| 176105588 (Comments: 7) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 121) | Сега не ме пита commented 2025-12-22 09:43:30 UTC by Fraxi ♦205 |
| 176190547 (Comments: 1) | Britzz (Discussed changesets: 55) | Bonjour Britzz, Je n'étais pas au courant que la piste cyclable du bas de la rue de Montreuil avait été supprimée. C'est bien ce que tu as constaté sur le terrain ? Au plaisir Beno&ici... commented 2025-12-22 09:34:05 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦199 |
| 176136423 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 8) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176252794 commented 2025-12-22 09:27:24 UTC by TinPetreković ♦212 |
| 176220619 (Comments: 2) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Uneori, se mai întâmplă să nu se alinieze corect. Totuși, e centimetric, altfel trebuie să zoomez la modu’ în care văd doar 2 cm, ceea ce uneori e greu. Știu că acesta este cel mai respectat servicii cartografic din lum... commented 2025-12-22 09:07:37 UTC by openstreetmapbuddy ♦2 |
| 176177834 (Comments: 1) | Mmm88mmM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mmm88mmM, добрый день Бассейны лучше тегировать согласно вики (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Swimming_and_bathing) commented 2025-12-22 09:05:58 UTC by empty_child ♦372 |
| 152604112 (Comments: 5) | flex16 (Discussed changesets: 5) | yes, but what kind of action is needed? in the current form it is utterly useless commented 2025-12-22 09:00:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 168539825 (Comments: 12) | Sieradzkiewsie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Podaj adres mail to ci wyśle commented 2025-12-22 08:59:01 UTC by Sieradzkiewsie ♦1 |
| 176006033 (Comments: 4) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 271) | Okey, dzięki bardzo za zerknięcie commented 2025-12-22 08:55:11 UTC by voltairovicz ♦237 |
| 171446859 (Comments: 1) | LAZACARTO (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour LAZACARTO, Est-ce vraiment sur que le poteau indicateur "Boscodon" (et pas Boscondon) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12151256907 n'existe plus du tout ? Ou est-ce que le poteau "Boscodon" se trouve maint... commented 2025-12-22 08:47:41 UTC by Patchi ♦140 |
| 176205625 (Comments: 2) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 125) | feel free to map platform as area if overlapping ways are a big problem for you but this deletion made things worse, just to make QA error go away (deleting all data would bring it even lower!) commented 2025-12-22 08:39:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176205299 (Comments: 1) | Mbalazs81 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Szia! Ha felkerül a házszám a bejáratra, a belső pontok törölhetőek, pl.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13369147158 Vagy ami még jobb, legközelebb csak húzd oda a meglé... commented 2025-12-22 08:37:42 UTC by gabro00 ♦331 |
| 176242373 (Comments: 1) | mainstreetphysiciangroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-22 08:03:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 164819516 (Comments: 2) | samuel_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Salut Sebastien, ok pour la modif et merci pour le suivi ! commented 2025-12-22 08:01:48 UTC by samuel_geovelo ♦10 |
| 175837464 (Comments: 4) | mircozorzo (Discussed changesets: 60) | Grazie! commented 2025-12-22 07:55:21 UTC by mircozorzo ♦27 |
| 176211441 (Comments: 2) | The Wise Moth of Indigo Tower (Discussed changesets: 7) | Cheers mate commented 2025-12-22 07:49:42 UTC by The Wise Moth of Indigo Tower ♦6 |
 | 176194199 (Comments: 1) | farah rafat alyaseen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please don't add fiction to OSM because OSM is a live worldwide database from which hundreds of maps are compiled. You may one day have to rely on one of those maps. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-22 07:39:57 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 176193878 (Comments: 1) | farah rafat alyaseen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Removed commented 2025-12-22 07:36:37 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 176194016 (Comments: 1) | farah rafat alyaseen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fiction crossing removed commented 2025-12-22 07:36:14 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 176194173 (Comments: 1) | farah rafat alyaseen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Duplicated highway removed commented 2025-12-22 07:31:46 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 176187307 (Comments: 4) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 331) | Ich habe es noch mal verändert, so dass nur 2 Bereiche übrig sind. Die sind zwar nicht mit einem Zaun abgetrennt, aber die Spannungsebene ist hier wichtig. Siehe Open Infrastructur Map Der Liegenschaftskataster ist nicht frei, wir or... commented 2025-12-22 07:26:02 UTC by geozeisig ♦233 |
| 176236354 (Comments: 1) | JohnnyWvD (Discussed changesets: 14) | Tip.. Een bord kun je toevoegen aan de tagging van de weg met traffic_sign=NL:C15 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-22 07:11:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176199576 (Comments: 1) | Jamie Ashworth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19198 commented 2025-12-22 07:01:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 173264712 (Comments: 4) | cciirraa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Odlično ako je bolje. Ovo je prva staza koju sam postavio. Vidim da se domaćini trude pa sam se i ja aktivirao da dam svoj doprinos :) Eto taj Šot vrh treba preimenovati. Što se staze tiče mislim da je ok osim da se malo precizni... commented 2025-12-22 06:53:14 UTC by cciirraa ♦1 |
| 176160292 (Comments: 1) | Satyajit Ray (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Satyajit Ray, I think your changes must have broken something, because now the Madrid relation can't be found on Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html?q=R5326784 Please double check what's wrong and... commented 2025-12-22 06:51:28 UTC by vricciardulli ♦28 |
| 176236262 (Comments: 2) | Jereon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voorlopig heb ik je wijzigingen teruggedraaid met Wijzigingenset #176247074 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-22 06:51:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176232388 (Comments: 3) | zaneto (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ciao, in realtà non so se è causa tua, nel senso che è vero che il problema è avvenuto dopo la tua modifica, ma non è comprensibile il motivo. Potrebbe anche essere un problema dell'editor. Non preoccuparti,... commented 2025-12-22 06:46:40 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
| 176215393 (Comments: 1) | pipolab (Discussed changesets: 7) | motor_vehicle=no, vous êtes sûr ? On peut au moins accéder à Chatel l'été. Peut-être au moins 'destination', je pense. commented 2025-12-22 06:45:18 UTC by yvecai ♦79 |
| 126177048 (Comments: 1) | Almawiki (Discussed changesets: 6) | Polska dla Polaków commented 2025-12-22 06:43:58 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦34 |
| 152483229 (Comments: 2) | Boogier (Discussed changesets: 5) | because when I was there that part of the path overgrew and disappeared/was not passable commented 2025-12-22 06:13:55 UTC by Boogier ♦5 |
 | 176147583 (Comments: 1) | 桑伯迪 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Why did you add disused:railway=station, but didn't remove railway=station? These 2 tags conflict with each other. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176147583 ... commented 2025-12-22 05:19:42 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 176174580 (Comments: 1) | 桑伯迪 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Why did you delete railway=station and train=yes tags here? commented 2025-12-22 05:16:41 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 176223694 (Comments: 1) | 桑伯迪 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Why did you delete public_transport=station here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176223694 commented 2025-12-22 05:14:09 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 176223814 (Comments: 1) | 桑伯迪 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Why did you delete street address, network and railway=station tags? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176223814 commented 2025-12-22 05:12:54 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 176223976 (Comments: 1) | 桑伯迪 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Why did you delete railway:ref=98 tag? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176223976 commented 2025-12-22 05:11:32 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 176241395 (Comments: 1) | ゆかわ (Discussed changesets: 2) | 施設種別の変更も願います。 commented 2025-12-22 04:16:56 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦38 |
| 155990332 (Comments: 1) | PortalNomad (Discussed changesets: 1) | duplicated, deleted commented 2025-12-22 04:13:17 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦209 |
| 176242383 (Comments: 1) | hallows1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This tag is not generally necessary as the boundaries of the districts are already mapped. Pokolbin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6059206 Cessnock: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6058958#map=13/-32.83349/151.36709 Nu... commented 2025-12-22 04:02:17 UTC by nevw ♦2,099 |
| 176241718 (Comments: 1) | ゆかわ (Discussed changesets: 2) | 『name は名称だけ』 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:名称#name は名称だけ 『JA:Key:disused:*』 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:disused:* commented 2025-12-22 03:52:55 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦38 |
| 176197644 (Comments: 1) | Argyris91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Road relations in Greece can only contain the mainline of the route as members, not facilities such as toll buildings. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route for more details. commented 2025-12-22 03:44:27 UTC by ika-chan! ♦313 |
| 176240904 (Comments: 1) | dsmntr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bitte als disused:shop=* oder disused:amenity=* (oder shop=vacant) stehen lassen - solange das Ladenlokal noch existiert. commented 2025-12-22 03:21:14 UTC by Bienson ♦367 |
| 176203094 (Comments: 6) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yes - split the way and remove the oneway tag as needed. commented 2025-12-22 03:16:33 UTC by Glassman ♦5,663 |
| 176242137 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | I made a typo in both the comment and the source. The correct URL is https://osm.org/changeset/176165267. commented 2025-12-22 03:12:31 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦153 |
| 176165267 (Comments: 6) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | Alright, will do! commented 2025-12-22 03:09:17 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦153 |
| 176074942 (Comments: 4) | Beerron (Discussed changesets: 3) | Подправил границы парковки по снимкам ESRI. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451008262 commented 2025-12-22 02:49:56 UTC by Beerron ♦3 |
| 176236592 (Comments: 1) | dsmntr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, Die Geschäfte/Büros liegen im Gebäude, nicht in der Wand. POIs sollten ungefähr zentral platziert werden, nicht am Eingang. commented 2025-12-22 02:46:52 UTC by Bienson ♦367 |
| 174866226 (Comments: 4) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Also note that roads should not run through buildings unless there is a road tunnel going underneath buildings or a road bridge going over buildings. Sections of road going underneath buildings should be tagged with tunnel=yes, and sections of road g... commented 2025-12-22 02:02:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176211907 (Comments: 5) | TateMorrison1010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Was looking at old Sentinel imagery, latest shows what looks like bare ground where the house was. Thanks all. commented 2025-12-22 01:57:05 UTC by nevw ♦2,099 |
| 176159951 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 64) | Hello Sungod2306, The video linked below was recorded approximately one month after the release of the Trolldom film and depicts the trail intact, with only two boards removed. This observation is consistent with photographs taken from across ... commented 2025-12-22 01:31:39 UTC by eerib ♦220 |
| 161440816 (Comments: 1) | TateMorrison1010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I notice you have accidentally dragged a couple of nodes here. Do you want me to fix them? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161440816 commented 2025-12-22 01:16:42 UTC by nevw ♦2,099 |
| 175740817 (Comments: 2) | jSeke (Discussed changesets: 12) | tapadh leibh airson ur comhairle, ma thachras sin cuiridh mi Tiriodh sa Ghàidhlig a-righist cuideachd. commented 2025-12-22 01:13:54 UTC by jSeke ♦16 |
| 70946725 (Comments: 1) | Franz-Peter Scherer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Franz-Peter Scherer, das ist hier ein Wohnhaus. Wenn darin ein Architekt sein Büro hat, trägt man dafür einen separaten PIO ein. Man benennt nicht das Wohnhaus nach dem Büro. Der Name des Gebäudes hat eine andere Fun... commented 2025-12-22 01:08:29 UTC by Akkurator ♦299 |
| 176218740 (Comments: 1) | LambariGaba (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have reverted this edit because it appears to vandalize the map. If you disagree, please leave me a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176218740 commented 2025-12-22 00:55:20 UTC by Glassman ♦5,663 |
| 176073498 (Comments: 3) | RezGolf (Discussed changesets: 3) | These (4) changesets on one of the top golf courses in the country were littered with some extensive bad mapping. Some really well defined sandtraps were deleted and replaced with harsh, blocky low-node-count ways. Existing, golf course elements (wi... commented 2025-12-22 00:15:46 UTC by b-jazz ♦787 |
| 175665758 (Comments: 2) | zwombie (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hallo Roger, ja habe ich, ich bin persönlich mehrfach dort lang gelaufen und geradelt commented 2025-12-22 00:11:48 UTC by zwombie ♦9 |
| 156628547 (Comments: 2) | zwombie (Discussed changesets: 17) | very well possible, fel free to change it, I do not remeber having taged the buildings so specificaly and caravanq is most certainly misspelled commented 2025-12-22 00:09:11 UTC by zwombie ♦9 |
| 171422250 (Comments: 1) | W3NET0wns (Discussed changesets: 29) | Czemu skasowałeś area:highway? commented 2025-12-22 00:06:20 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦838 |
| 176237446 (Comments: 1) | mdjaviergarcia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Se mapean cosas que hay en terreno, no anotaciones personales. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176237446 commented 2025-12-21 23:40:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 176025032 (Comments: 4) | gomedia91 (Discussed changesets: 40) | I've restored the tertiary road that appears to have been incorrectly deleted commented 2025-12-21 23:28:39 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦152 |
| 175986584 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | Oh, okay. Should I delete this polygon, too? commented 2025-12-21 23:19:52 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦153 |
| 176236239 (Comments: 1) | test0022012 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi test0022012; Please leave a comment describing your changes to facilitate understanding and follow-up Thank you for your contribution commented 2025-12-21 23:15:55 UTC by VLD0251 ♦11 |
| 176136569 (Comments: 9) | gallseife (Discussed changesets: 37) | Abgedreht :) commented 2025-12-21 23:10:55 UTC by gallseife ♦49 |
| 176113974 (Comments: 4) | AJV02 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hartelijk dank! Helder, en dat van de gebouw omtrekken waar ik een adresnode had moeten selecteren, dat snap ik en dat vind ik nog wel ergens (als zoiets weer speelt). Groet! commented 2025-12-21 22:42:20 UTC by AJV02 ♦1 |
| 173925523 (Comments: 2) | moltes74 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ce changement a laissé les tags sur les lanes dans un état incohérent, je répare. commented 2025-12-21 22:27:49 UTC by Marc Mongenet ♦30 |
| 176236904 (Comments: 1) | kamlukasz (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 22:27:28 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176236742 (Comments: 1) | kamlukasz (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 22:27:22 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176236604 (Comments: 1) | kamlukasz (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 22:27:14 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176236583 (Comments: 1) | kamlukasz (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 22:27:02 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176236350 (Comments: 1) | kamlukasz (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 22:26:57 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176196560 (Comments: 6) | fkrautscheid (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, ich fürchte, so etwas lässt nicht richtig gut abbilden. Wenn schon, dann eher description. Bei note soll der/die nächste Mapper auf etwas hingewiesen werden; das ist hier eigentlich nicht der Fall. Dann lass es doch ein... commented 2025-12-21 22:21:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 174389097 (Comments: 1) | moltes74 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Cette modification laisse des données dans un état incohérent concernant les lanes (par ex. lanes=2; turn:lanes=none|none|slight_right. Je remets tout ça en bon état. commented 2025-12-21 22:19:55 UTC by Marc Mongenet ♦30 |
| 176234026 (Comments: 2) | mapko (Discussed changesets: 64) | Ahoj. Diky, nespravne som precital vykres. To Brodno patri na skorsi vyjazd. (Tam som nechal Zilina-Brodno, aj ked vykres hovori nieco ine.) Opravil som tu chybu co som spravil. commented 2025-12-21 22:18:58 UTC by mapko ♦110 |
| 176209145 (Comments: 1) | Jtom64 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, keine Anmerkung. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-21 22:17:54 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 169521027 (Comments: 1) | _Lx_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | edit reverted commented 2025-12-21 22:17:02 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦209 |
| 176208797 (Comments: 1) | Jtom64 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, ich habe mir deine Anpassung angeschaut. Das sieht gut aus. Eine kleine Anmerkung: Wenn du dich dafür entscheidest, bei einzelnen Nodes innerhalb des Gebäudes auch die Adresse redundant zu erfassen – was man machen kan... commented 2025-12-21 22:16:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176214988 (Comments: 1) | linox2903 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich vermute, du bist über eine Fehlermeldung beim Hochladen gestolpert. Das liegt daran, dass du einen Weg versehentlich verschoben... commented 2025-12-21 22:13:28 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176222524 (Comments: 1) | Danny Lacey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thanks for you contribution to OSM. A couple of questions: 1. Is this actually where the AED is located? The map point is inside a building that doesn't match you location description? 2. Did you put your own name and ph... commented 2025-12-21 22:03:57 UTC by TheSwavu ♦574 |
| 176210432 (Comments: 1) | Centrum Pomocy Psychologicznej UnicSystem Dawid Stasiak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opis zestawu zmian ani OSM to nie miejsce na reklamę - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 22:02:53 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176201016 (Comments: 2) | M_9999 (Discussed changesets: 8) | As seen on osmi https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.02208&lat=-27.47595&zoom=18 commented 2025-12-21 22:00:25 UTC by nevw ♦2,099 |
| 176236671 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 371) | Comment moet zijn slingerhekje toegevoegd commented 2025-12-21 21:52:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176234809 (Comments: 1) | Hans Zorn (Discussed changesets: 4) | De naam staat weer op de adresnode conform afspraken binnen OSM. Adres ook verwijderd. Er is een adresnode. Het Kadaster werkt niet met samengestelde adressen. Dat doen bedrijven dan overigens weer zelf los van het officiële adres. |
| 176233306 (Comments: 1) | SpookyTim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-21 21:23:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 168192373 (Comments: 1) | XioNoX (Discussed changesets: 22) | barrier=full-height_turnstile pour le passage piéton entre l'Espace François Quéré et le Troisième éperon. commented 2025-12-21 21:19:45 UTC by trial ♦1,005 |
| 176209575 (Comments: 4) | Bauboo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Probeer het volgende week maar eens.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=50.910676%2C5.736813%3B50.91062%2C5.737752#map=17/50.909416/5.739251 Er zijn ook routers die private negeren... zeker als er een ... commented 2025-12-21 21:12:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
 | 176235413 (Comments: 1) | Kerploonk (Discussed changesets: 16) | *Speed limits* commented 2025-12-21 21:11:09 UTC by Kerploonk ♦19 |
| 175974091 (Comments: 2) | JFFTU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Guten Abend, ich bin über https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Germany#12/52.3806/13.2856 hierdrauf gestoßen... An JFFTU Hier bei OSM arbeitest du mit Live-Daten! Änderst du was, ist es defakton sofort in der Da... commented 2025-12-21 21:10:09 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,110 |
| 175998573 (Comments: 2) | Paul-François (Discussed changesets: 5) | Et pour Vannes, que ce soit deux bâtiments, ce n'est pour autant qu'une agence, sachant que Morbihan Accession occupe les mêmes locaux (pour de bonnes raisons). Et le bâtiment ne porte pas ce nom. building=service : B&a... commented 2025-12-21 21:07:03 UTC by trial ♦1,005 |
 | 176052399 (Comments: 1) | Денис Мусин (Discussed changesets: 1) | здравствуйте, спасибо за правки. пожалуйста, не удаляйте правильно заданные адреса - адресация по умолчанию на бел мове, русское названи... commented 2025-12-21 21:03:49 UTC by 4004 ♦1,929 |
| 175124392 (Comments: 1) | ZldYe (Discussed changesets: 52) | Dag, Mijn vraag: Wat doet je denken dat de bosgebieden ten noorden van de kazerne militair oefenterrein zijn? Alle bronnen geven aan dat onder meer de landgoederen Hoog Moersbergen, Mollebos en Driebergse Bos in eigendom zijn bij Utrech... commented 2025-12-21 21:02:11 UTC by nilodo ♦16 |
| 176212457 (Comments: 4) | Hans Zorn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wanneer adres , naam en functie gekoppeld is werkt het echt het beste in OSM. commented 2025-12-21 21:02:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176206927 (Comments: 1) | Fedde89 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hoi, Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me prima zo. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-21 20:48:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
 | 145270656 (Comments: 2) | ginnyTheCat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yea idk what I was doing there. I think I mixed it up with source:maxspeed=sign. Whoops, thx for catching that. commented 2025-12-21 20:37:28 UTC by ginnyTheCat ♦8 |
| 176180029 (Comments: 1) | nyan_yu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap. La boulangerie s'occupe que le rez-de-chaussée du bâtiment. C'est pourquoi d'une manière générale il vaut mieux NE PAS mettre les données d'un com... commented 2025-12-21 20:37:16 UTC by trial ♦1,005 |
| 176194826 (Comments: 6) | Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bedankt voor het oplossen! commented 2025-12-21 20:29:52 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,041 |
| 176200264 (Comments: 1) | tyil (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi Je vraagt feedback.. Wanneer je gras op bos legt zie je het door elkaar renderen. Ik heb het bos van het gras gehaald. Je ziet nu aan het begin van de 'laan' nog bos op gras. CTRL-F5 voor het effect en dan zal het wel weer ver... commented 2025-12-21 20:19:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176200137 (Comments: 1) | Mark0075 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for helping to improve building coverage in OSM! As you're making use of rapid's suggested buildings, I wanted to let you know that they are not suitable for import in all situations, for example where there are semidetached or t... commented 2025-12-21 20:13:05 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦152 |
| 176212630 (Comments: 2) | Hans Zorn (Discussed changesets: 4) | typo duplikaat commented 2025-12-21 20:07:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176232762 (Comments: 1) | TranslatorPS (Discussed changesets: 26) | Jeszcze większe dzięki za te inne linie ❤️ commented 2025-12-21 20:07:01 UTC by marazzer ♦58 |
| 176222311 (Comments: 1) | thunderberry (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, noch einmal der Hinweis auf die Namen. Bitte erfasse diese nicht. Ich werde beizeiten alles, was nach Personennamen klingt, löschen. Den Rest schiebe ich nach description. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-21 19:55:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176137411 (Comments: 4) | emoro59 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Faccio il revert, così puoi fare le modifiche quando puoi. commented 2025-12-21 19:48:18 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
| 176159905 (Comments: 2) | d3mol3k (Discussed changesets: 109) | Cześć - tak to celowy zabieg - tworzymy relację dla obu kierunków - z Leszna w stronę Cybulic i druga w kierunku przeciwnym. Pozostały do uzupełnienia tagi ref, description i source po dodaniu danych na mapie GITD Canard. Zauważyłe... commented 2025-12-21 19:41:40 UTC by d3mol3k ♦181 |
| 176221650 (Comments: 1) | tracker998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Tracker, es macht wirklich keinen Sinn Radwege auf Parkplatznebenfahrgassen zu erfassen. Auch Fußwege wären eine seltene Ausnahme und das Nicht-Vorhandensein Muss nicht explizit erfasst werden. --- ... commented 2025-12-21 19:37:45 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,465 |
| 176106214 (Comments: 2) | benguuuuu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Interesting, I wonder if that happened when I came back in with a saved JSOM session...maybe it re-uploaded or something so it stacked. If you can update, otherwise I'll get to it. commented 2025-12-21 19:34:39 UTC by benguuuuu ♦5 |
| 175125329 (Comments: 1) | antonicholewinski (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 19:29:38 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 175566230 (Comments: 1) | antonicholewinski (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 19:29:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176230206 (Comments: 1) | antonicholewinski (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-21 19:29:25 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176231527 (Comments: 1) | Salmonings (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Salmonings, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 3 name(s) Could you please confirm if these... commented 2025-12-21 19:14:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 175974487 (Comments: 3) | gtalbot (Discussed changesets: 4) | Excellent merci! Je vais voir sur osmose si on peut désactiver la vérifications. commented 2025-12-21 18:57:31 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦454 |
| 176180901 (Comments: 1) | luisfelipetavaresferro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für deine Änderungen in OSM! Ich habe eine Nachfrage dazu: Die neue Grenze des Schulgeländes der Modeschule und Außenlinie des Gebäudes, die du hier gezeichnet hast, passt nicht zu aktuellen Luftbildern (aus ... commented 2025-12-21 18:46:26 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦436 |
| 176214830 (Comments: 3) | Zrop (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hallo, ja, auf die Fläche gesehen schon. Den Anfangsteil des way nicht aufzuteilen, ist eher die Regel als die Ausnahme, da die Einmündungen über den Linienzug abstrahiert werden. Einzige mir bekannte und verbreitete Ausnahme... commented 2025-12-21 18:42:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 154183549 (Comments: 3) | Giertje64 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, Ik ben inmiddels iets 'verder' en heb ook eens (alleen maar) gekeken hoe één en ander gemapt staat in Walibi - in ieder geval waren daar enkele dezelfde mappers bezig, maakt verder niet uit. Ik stel vast dat die attrac... commented 2025-12-21 18:28:42 UTC by Op'tRad ♦53 |
| 176197770 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Здравей! wikidata тага се поставя на точно един OSM елемент. Поради тази причина са създадени релации за всяка улица и върху съответната релац... commented 2025-12-21 18:27:09 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦758 |
| 176229221 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 21) | The node that was accidentally created was deleted in changeset/176229535 since it served no real purpose. commented 2025-12-21 18:21:51 UTC by JakovBušić ♦29 |
| 176084665 (Comments: 5) | firepanda11 (Discussed changesets: 5) | You are mostly correct. I think the easiest way to look at this road is it is private property unless you've been invited by somebody. Despite being private property it is not strictly enforced. There aren't private property signs up and pe... commented 2025-12-21 18:18:48 UTC by firepanda11 ♦4 |
| 176152824 (Comments: 1) | Frinklek (Discussed changesets: 4) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459699998 FYI, I fixed up the 12th green. If there is no fringe around the green, the fairway shouldn't surround the green, but should instead butt up next to it and share the nodes at the border of ... commented 2025-12-21 18:17:38 UTC by b-jazz ♦787 |
| 163675830 (Comments: 4) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 46) | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality commented 2025-12-21 18:06:08 UTC by kuhni74 ♦404 |
| 176156563 (Comments: 1) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hocam şuraya access:no yapmışsın galiba ama arabalar geçiyor oradan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458708056 commented 2025-12-21 17:55:38 UTC by tg4567 ♦36 |
| 173047044 (Comments: 1) | Mohan Lanka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13204703275/history has shop = chicken_shop that was added in this edit shop=chicken_shop ? is it seling living chickens, raw chicken meat as food, products for chickens like animal feed? Something else? commented 2025-12-21 17:51:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176204671 (Comments: 1) | ShakyIsles (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, I rhink https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19984750 looks like a riding arena and not like a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding), similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291253239 (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian). commented 2025-12-21 17:50:48 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦860 |
| 176219181 (Comments: 7) | scarapella (Discussed changesets: 12) | I was curious about the relative use of the different canoe portage conventions, so I did a little digging. There are currently 88 waterways with canoe=portage https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hCX and 1289 highways with canoe=portage. |
| 176196925 (Comments: 2) | Interteutones (Discussed changesets: 83) | Danke für den Hinweis. War ein versehen meinerseits. Habe es korrigiert. Grüße I commented 2025-12-21 17:43:24 UTC by Interteutones ♦51 |
| 176218157 (Comments: 1) | Oussama A (Discussed changesets: 6) | You changed the name:ar tag from وادي الفقير to واد الفقير without providing any source It would be more appropriate to keep the original name and add وادي الفقير as alt_name:ar commented 2025-12-21 17:41:31 UTC by VLD0251 ♦11 |
| 176200832 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 200) | Oh, alright then. I guess I'll just have to wait then. commented 2025-12-21 17:31:00 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦153 |
| 175270903 (Comments: 1) | Olflo30 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-21 17:29:23 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176226344 (Comments: 1) | PT2023 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Super, dziękuję :) commented 2025-12-21 17:16:37 UTC by Szymson ♦452 |
| 175230835 (Comments: 1) | Akrimullah (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. In JOSM keep the ctrl ... commented 2025-12-21 17:06:41 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176003609 (Comments: 2) | gtalbot (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Sorry about not commenting this change. It was an oversight on my part. I made the change based on a recommandation from "OSMOSE" that flagged the presence of "oneway=yes" on roundabouts as a error that needed fixing. |
| 1 (Comments: 55) | Steve (Discussed changesets: 5) | I was there (20 years late tho) commented 2025-12-21 16:54:34 UTC by mactavishfr ♦3 |
| 175223146 (Comments: 1) | Ginandra Reny (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. Most buildings are fair rectangular. sometimes covered a bit by trees. Map them as a rectangular, and folllow the rooflines including the extensions etc. Square each building with the Q key while selected. |
| 175439277 (Comments: 1) | Asror Tajriba (Discussed changesets: 8) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. In JOSM Keep the ctr key down to when you map c... commented 2025-12-21 16:52:53 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 175238448 (Comments: 1) | Naumam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-21 16:52:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
 | 176096261 (Comments: 2) | dingoy29 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hi! Yes, you're absolutely right. The name:ru=only_right_turn tag is definitely not needed there. It's my mistake. It should be there building=yes commented 2025-12-21 16:49:44 UTC by dingoy29 ♦23 |
| 176184133 (Comments: 3) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Zostaw trochę node-ów dla innych 😂 Zmiana dobra, wszystko jest okej --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176184133 commented 2025-12-21 16:39:40 UTC by marazzer ♦58 |
| 176179458 (Comments: 1) | sm4rk0 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Исправка: не треба додати сегмент у релацију. iD је то већ урадио. commented 2025-12-21 16:38:56 UTC by sm4rk0 ♦12 |
| 176211689 (Comments: 3) | fthierygeo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vielen Dank für die Erläuterung. “Open Access” ist in der Regel für osm nicht ausreichend, da eine Quellennennung gefordert wird, die wir lediglich in den osm-Daten, nicht aber in daraus abgeleiteten Werken garantieren k&ou... commented 2025-12-21 16:31:12 UTC by limes11 ♦979 |
| 17998142 (Comments: 2) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 171) | Finally catching up: possibly! The notion of the tag is to delineate a plant community not the dominant_taxon key, where "Picea" would be an appropriate value. This was very much a bit of experimental tagging trying to find relativel... commented 2025-12-21 16:25:54 UTC by SK53 ♦866 |
| 176023063 (Comments: 4) | Wandergecko (Discussed changesets: 6) | Vielen Dank. Bei mir sieht der Standardwert nicht ausgegraut aus, sondern so, als wäre bei einem Pfad alles explizit als "yes" gesetzt außer Motorfahrzeuge. Bisher habe ich mehr mit den "Hilfen" oben gearbeitet, nich... commented 2025-12-21 16:09:02 UTC by Wandergecko ♦4 |
| 176164427 (Comments: 2) | AnmiTaliDev (Discussed changesets: 1) | @mueschel, Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't know commented 2025-12-21 15:57:50 UTC by AnmiTaliDev ♦1 |
| 176214922 (Comments: 1) | Jubaran (Discussed changesets: 2) | house \tposchodovy_dom name \tSukromny dom toto aplikácie nepoznajú, treba dávať len schválené značky použite len building=detached https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Ddetached commented 2025-12-21 15:41:39 UTC by Dodko ♦1,282 |
| 176214998 (Comments: 1) | Jubaran (Discussed changesets: 2) | Názov Slepá ulica aplikácie nepoznajú, na konci ulice umiestnite značku https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noexit%3Dyes commented 2025-12-21 15:39:23 UTC by Dodko ♦1,282 |
| 176194323 (Comments: 1) | prevo102 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Otváracie hodiny musia byť v angličtine, inak to aplikácie nepoznajú pomôcka je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ commented 2025-12-21 15:35:39 UTC by Dodko ♦1,282 |
| 174211857 (Comments: 1) | 02826029060144502929130510688614624 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Warum hast du hier die Wege mit der Postleitzahl Grenze verbunden, und dort überall "highway=crossing" hinzugefügt? z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13281417768 --- Published us... commented 2025-12-21 15:35:10 UTC by Tatfahren ♦307 |
| 39340218 (Comments: 2) | FahRadler (Discussed changesets: 73) | Hat sich erledigt. Die Daten wurden von mir geändert. Die GPS Höhe entsprach der der amtl. Karte. Zudem hast du die Gipfel nicht urspr. eingetragen. commented 2025-12-21 15:22:01 UTC by Lokai ♦486 |
| 176205952 (Comments: 1) | hendradap (Discussed changesets: 1) | tekan tombol Q untuk mengotakkan bangunan commented 2025-12-21 15:17:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦140 |
| 176221006 (Comments: 1) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 43) | Thank you! I only noticed that this could be a problem this weekend, when the name of a London Borough with name tags which included name=* (in English) and name:fr=* but not name:en=* was presented to me in French. I assume that this was infl... commented 2025-12-21 15:03:32 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 176177129 (Comments: 2) | neverdance (Discussed changesets: 6) | Fixed commented 2025-12-21 15:00:52 UTC by neverdance ♦4 |
| 155868749 (Comments: 2) | Ugo de barros (Discussed changesets: 1) | fait ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176221418 commented 2025-12-21 14:56:28 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,288 |
| 176175976 (Comments: 3) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 43) | This is the final one. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176221006 commented 2025-12-21 14:48:18 UTC by Jobigutenburg ♦15 |
| 175687656 (Comments: 3) | Sander Sõnaj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! revisited today, connected these 2 paths + the service road that one of the path led to. Might later extend the parking lot area around the houses, but the road network is already correct. commented 2025-12-21 14:44:53 UTC by Sander Sõnaj ♦2 |
| 176110347 (Comments: 4) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 247) | Super! Thanks! commented 2025-12-21 14:28:01 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦454 |
| 176080016 (Comments: 1) | mkarau (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, mkarau; Thank you very much for your help in updating the OSM maps in the United Arab Emirates. I noticed that you added some tags, such as the layer tag. This modification is illogical because the value you added here (w1190118766, w50040... commented 2025-12-21 13:56:28 UTC by mona_mohsen ♦2 |
| X | 176213473 (Comments: 1) | Hervella (Discussed changesets: 4) | you forgot to save your changes in Spain before moving on to Cuba, which made a huge changeset. Also, you should use the international format (+34) for phone numbers. commented 2025-12-21 13:43:26 UTC by ilias_ ♦403 |
| 176153939 (Comments: 1) | Slayerok1927 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Проїз на парковці, тим паче на парковці з позначеними дорожньою розміткою місцями для парковки, варто позначати service=parking_aisle на додаток д... commented 2025-12-21 13:29:58 UTC by Gregory UKR ♦48 |
| 176216201 (Comments: 1) | kniederkr (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi kniederkr :) Thanks for improving the data in Athens :) I'm writing to you, as you mentioned "review_requested"and you wrote that "don't know how to tag hotel and cafe at once". My suggestion would be to... commented 2025-12-21 13:28:44 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦132 |
| 176216966 (Comments: 1) | muyrety (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Probeer als het kan daar op bij te taggen. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-21 13:23:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176208778 (Comments: 1) | Basstoelpel (Discussed changesets: 48) | Moin Basstoelpel, ich bin seit Wochen schrittweise dabei in Bennigsen auf Basis zwischenzeitlich freigegebener Daten von Niedersachsen DOP20 und GeoBasis-DE/LGLN 2025 Lageverbesserungen an Gebäuden/Straßen sowie addr.-Daten zu erfassen.... commented 2025-12-21 13:20:32 UTC by werbuli ♦14 |
| 176216853 (Comments: 1) | dcenkuwibeks (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bitte einmal auf technische Fehler prüfen, ist meine erste größere Änderung in JOSM. Danke :-) commented 2025-12-21 13:06:48 UTC by dcenkuwibeks ♦4 |
| 176206717 (Comments: 3) | Ev1dence (Discussed changesets: 80) | Bet tev no paša sākuma nekas nav jādzēš. Neatkarīgi no tā, vai tu zīmē kaut ko šeit vai citur atpakaļ, nevajag pirms tam neko masveidā dzēst. Var dzēst, ja elementi vairs sen neeksistē vai ir pilnīgi nepareizi. Bet &... commented 2025-12-21 13:01:46 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 174516592 (Comments: 2) | Kurt34 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Schade, dass du nicht antwortest... Ich habe es nun geändert. commented 2025-12-21 12:45:35 UTC by Metzor ♦397 |
| 176211661 (Comments: 3) | Toaby (Discussed changesets: 3) | No problem.. Nog een tip.. In OSM geen spatie in de postcode. Mapse, eggie commented 2025-12-21 12:44:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176215095 (Comments: 1) | mustmiekieke (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Must.. Je vraagt feedback. Wanneer het pad niet bestaat dan kan het uiteraard weg. Paden die dichtgroeien taggen we vaak eerst met disused:highway=path Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-21 12:31:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176214623 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. You leave alot of streets unconnected. Please pay atention, or use an app which you can/know how to use. commented 2025-12-21 12:18:49 UTC by rarad74 ♦335 |
| 176084689 (Comments: 4) | Eddy64 (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, thanks to your alert @Neisbot, ok now https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176211911 commented 2025-12-21 12:18:49 UTC by Vinber ♦819 |
| 176132638 (Comments: 1) | Manitax (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Manitax. Willkommen bei OSM. Schön das du uns hilfst die Karte zu verbessern. Default-Accesswerte brauchst du nicht explizit setzen (bicycle=yes, foot=yes, horse=yes ist auf Feldwegen normal). Auch mit access=no sparsam umgehen. htt... commented 2025-12-21 12:15:49 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,465 |
| 176212016 (Comments: 2) | NadraHagen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fietspad hersteld.. Overbodige tagging verwijderd. access=private getagd. Al die losse P's verwijderd. Een hek kun je evt op een node zetten verbonden met de weg. barrier=gate access=private. Mapse, eggie commented 2025-12-21 12:15:20 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 170743060 (Comments: 1) | ITSB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Merci pour vos contributions. Afin de mieux comprendre les modifications effectuées, pourriez-vous utiliser un commentaire plus adapté lors de vos prochaines éditions ? Ce ... commented 2025-12-21 12:14:06 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦50 |
| 165706578 (Comments: 1) | Brentar (Discussed changesets: 21) | You added several reedbeed areas as islands (inner areas) in lake relation, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290242536 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290240794. On maps by the Land Board these are not mapped as islands. They draw ... commented 2025-12-21 12:13:25 UTC by Pikse ♦224 |
| 167494716 (Comments: 2) | BrummsLee (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo und danke für den Hinweis! Natürlich ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler beim "Umbau" des Kreisverkehrs. Da habe ich vergessen die Straße zu splitten. Hab es gleich korrigiert. Schönen 4. Advent! commented 2025-12-21 12:13:18 UTC by BrummsLee ♦23 |
| 176214003 (Comments: 1) | dcenkuwibeks (Discussed changesets: 5) | Änderung nach lokalem Aushang, bitte mal schauen, ob ich was technisch übersehen habe. Die Verlegung der 23 und 31 nach Billstedt hatte ich vergessen, die sind in folgendem Änderungssatz drin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17... commented 2025-12-21 12:10:06 UTC by dcenkuwibeks ♦4 |
| 176152436 (Comments: 2) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 247) | I see the wiki explains that cuttings should not count as layer -1, so you are right. Seems weird that layers do not follow the terrain though. Forget what I said in the two other changesets too. Thanks! commented 2025-12-21 12:05:25 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦454 |
| 176169415 (Comments: 2) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 247) | I see the wiki explains that cuttings should not count as layer -1, so you are right. Seems weird that layers do not follow the terrain though. Forget what I said in the two other changesets too. Thanks! commented 2025-12-21 12:04:40 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦454 |
| 176208750 (Comments: 1) | Boerke_M (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-21 11:59:43 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176201027 (Comments: 1) | roodborstje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-21 11:58:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 171635764 (Comments: 1) | Gerwin1711 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hoi, osm tag start_date. Kijk even hoe een datum invult. Overigens, april, niet mei. Groet commented 2025-12-21 11:55:00 UTC by Op'tRad ♦53 |
| 139597673 (Comments: 1) | bmaggi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, ARZON n'est pas la "ref" (comup) de la post_box. Avez-vous la possibilité d'y repasser ? D'après l'opendata La Poste (datanova), il s'agirait plutôt de "A1C2Z9". commented 2025-12-21 11:51:58 UTC by LudovicG ♦113 |
| 176179267 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM15 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Здравствуйте. Прошу прощения. Не переключилась между фоновым изображением и добавила неверно. Буду внимательней. commented 2025-12-21 11:48:30 UTC by Ozon OSM15 ♦7 |
| 176200968 (Comments: 1) | Ariki Dassori (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Buenos días. Una cosa es la estructura que está dentro de un recinto, y otra cosa es el recinto mismo. Dejé la Iglesia como estaba y dibujé la estructura por separado. Saludos --- ... commented 2025-12-21 11:47:07 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 175615244 (Comments: 1) | Vahigopi15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should have their corners squared. Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-21 11:39:38 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176146770 (Comments: 1) | Arne30 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Arne, Was ist mit den Fußwegen? gibt es die nicht mehr? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176146770 commented 2025-12-21 11:38:59 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,465 |
| 176087800 (Comments: 1) | Peca013 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Uradiću revert pošto ova promena nije u skladu sa načinom na koji se označavaju autobuske stanice u Srbiji. Za više informacija možete da stupite u kontakt sa OSM zajednicom u Srbiji. commented 2025-12-21 11:36:35 UTC by MaliMrav ♦68 |
| 176183288 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 86) | imo/afaik `area:highway` doesn't feel useful commented 2025-12-21 11:34:29 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦81 |
| 153035915 (Comments: 1) | VedrusFedor (Discussed changesets: 1) | А почему вы нарисовали на карте медицинский дефибриллятор в лесу? commented 2025-12-21 11:28:32 UTC by Calibrator ♦14 |
| 176206111 (Comments: 1) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 30) | Šī ietve https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426224052 bija iezīmēta pareizi - tā turpinās pēc pieturas līdz iebrauktuvei https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=805287218590445&focus=photo commented 2025-12-21 11:23:55 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 176110893 (Comments: 1) | Kemalkok07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. İnşa halinde diye çizdiğiniz yollar Temmuz 2025 tarihli uydu görüntülerinde görünmüyor. Yeryüzünde henüz bir inşa çalışması başlamadıysa, plan aşamasındaki bu yolları hig... commented 2025-12-21 11:23:42 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦191 |
| 176110091 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 21) | Wrong hgv restrictions accidentally made in this changeset, were removed in changeset 176212416. #OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-21 11:06:47 UTC by JakovBušić ♦29 |
| 176208037 (Comments: 2) | La Poste - DEX NA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre retour constructif. Effectivement, les véhicules peuvent y circuler mais l'accès vers la rue Jean Monnet n'est pas encore possible, et les travaux sont terminés pour l'un des bâti... commented 2025-12-21 10:46:49 UTC by La Poste - DEX NA ♦1 |
| 175451892 (Comments: 1) | 159Alex951 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for mapping on this task. A remark. You regularly just draw a rectangle over complex buildings with extensions, etc. Please map them more accurately, following the rooflines. Best regards commented 2025-12-21 10:42:57 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176211480 (Comments: 2) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 21) | The scope of work includes the construction of two (2) 680-foot side boarding platforms with standard passenger amenities, a parking lot with an adjacent plaza and bus turnaround, a platform approach, an at-grade pedestrian crossing, communicat... commented 2025-12-21 10:41:41 UTC by ieguy3 ♦21 |
| 176209357 (Comments: 1) | WoutDW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Even if the intentions are good, there are a few problems with this changeset. First, it is better to upload changes per area (Kortrijk area as one single change, Leuven area as a single change) and not in bul... commented 2025-12-21 10:34:04 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,678 |
 | 174552662 (Comments: 2) | 98Ujm (Discussed changesets: 31) | Sorry, I don’t know. I inherited all those tags from the previous editor without checking on their meaning. commented 2025-12-21 10:22:46 UTC by 98Ujm ♦20 |
| 176199845 (Comments: 1) | canofcatfood (Discussed changesets: 6) | I think the Kingaroy Heights Park and Environmental Area you have drawn looks very good. commented 2025-12-21 10:12:35 UTC by nevw ♦2,099 |
| 176201035 (Comments: 1) | chamdam (Discussed changesets: 26) | merci pour les retouches, n'étant pas sur place et vu le côté aléatoire de l'info voyageurs TAM/LiO par moment c'est pas évident. commented 2025-12-21 10:10:16 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦122 |
| 175535194 (Comments: 2) | Mav Chew (Discussed changesets: 1) | Another issue * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. Best regards commented 2025-12-21 10:08:34 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
 | 176157210 (Comments: 4) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Będę ruszał jeszcze dużo 😈 (ktoś musi) commented 2025-12-21 10:06:05 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦34 |
| 176201507 (Comments: 1) | Raildriver32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:etcs should not be used on relations. Relations are special objects used to group various parts of a railway line. Relations do not contain railway-specific dat... commented 2025-12-21 09:55:14 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,678 |
| 176209283 (Comments: 1) | Karikatuur (Discussed changesets: 1) | - Remapped house numbers according to https://eservices.minfin.fgov.be/ecad-web/#/ - Moved Stadsloket Hoboken to correct location and used a node commented 2025-12-21 09:38:00 UTC by Karikatuur ♦1 |
| 176208097 (Comments: 1) | DaanLT (Discussed changesets: 59) | What an amazing job you've done for my neighbourhood, legend. commented 2025-12-21 09:37:52 UTC by Jeigmz ♦2 |
| 176075836 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well. Regards, Prasanna Devi Madasamy commented 2025-12-21 09:34:46 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦11 |
| 176208177 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. Please do not draw lines without correct tags. Use ESRI images or Mapbox. Bing are old. Add comment for edits. commented 2025-12-21 09:28:22 UTC by rarad74 ♦335 |
| 176208631 (Comments: 2) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 21) | the circulation element shows they shove everyone to the 91 freeway. commented 2025-12-21 09:18:11 UTC by ieguy3 ♦21 |
| 175669642 (Comments: 1) | Sophie Labassa (Discussed changesets: 2) | bonjour oups ici vous avez transformé tout le village en station de transfert de déchets https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=waste_transfer_station Un accident est vite arrivé ^^ Je corrige <... commented 2025-12-21 09:15:25 UTC by Patchanka ♦418 |
| 175894640 (Comments: 3) | PT2023 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No to trzeba poprawić na unsigned_ref commented 2025-12-21 09:14:24 UTC by Szymson ♦452 |
| 175671335 (Comments: 1) | Sophie Labassa (Discussed changesets: 2) | bonjour merci pour les mises à jour. Attention par contre, on ne met pas de nom si l'objet n'en a pas (ici par exemple il ne faut pas mettre comme nom "terrain de basket" qui est simplement la description de l... commented 2025-12-21 09:10:10 UTC by Patchanka ♦418 |
| 176128671 (Comments: 2) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 32) | Спасибо за помощь. Впредь буду пользоваться шаблонами. Там ещё больше корректной информации по сетевым магазинам. Дополнил из шаблона. commented 2025-12-21 09:04:57 UTC by Calibrator ♦14 |
| 176206974 (Comments: 1) | awhchk (Discussed changesets: 3) | The slip roads are made `=motorway` for the existing status (cf TMCLK, TKOLTT) commented 2025-12-21 09:03:19 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,688 |
| 176207943 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 21) | they downgraded main from grand to ontario. honestly just as bad as the 91 freeway is through corona. seems their arterial logic doesn't make sense either commented 2025-12-21 08:44:31 UTC by ieguy3 ♦21 |
| 175800265 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 623) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457764711/history - może cię to zainteresować commented 2025-12-21 08:42:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176187775 (Comments: 1) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Skąd informacja że to jest w budowie? commented 2025-12-21 08:41:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176187925 (Comments: 2) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 12) | wycofane jako że opis edycji wskazuje na jej błędność https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176207957 commented 2025-12-21 08:41:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176187693 (Comments: 2) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 12) | jak nie nie ruszyła fizyczna budowa to nie jest do mapowania jako budowa, edycja wycofana https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176207915 commented 2025-12-21 08:39:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176182825 (Comments: 1) | baucd2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1. Please discuss this first before changing all of them. They are 25kV_ac KCR sizes, built as mainline national rail, and functions as suburban trains. The existing compromise is to use `route=subway` on the `railway=rail` 2. The `route=` alread... commented 2025-12-21 08:38:22 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,688 |
| 146329070 (Comments: 3) | LorenzoBassi_SICAI_Team (Discussed changesets: 26) | Ciao Lorenzo e grazie delle info. Ti segnalo alcune migliorie per i tag della relation. Prendo spunto dal sentiero escursionistico Sentiero Italia CAI, di cui qui un esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?relation=6933796 U... commented 2025-12-21 08:01:31 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
 | 124163531 (Comments: 2) | vichada (Discussed changesets: 51) | I actually don't see a reason for the fixme=yes ... In the currently available imagery, it looks no more or less "uncertain" than many of the objects mapped in the area... commented 2025-12-21 07:51:48 UTC by vichada ♦51 |
 | 176128010 (Comments: 1) | DENNIS MUSAU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please use building=yes instead of BUILDING=yes. commented 2025-12-21 07:27:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176190544 (Comments: 1) | amplejev1987 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Atkreipčiau dėmesį, kad šitos žolės yra visiškai nenaudingi duomenys, mes juos dabar pasižymime papildomai landcover=grass, kad būtų galima išmesti iš profesionalių žemėlapių, bet su laiku ištrinsime ir ... commented 2025-12-21 07:14:44 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,010 |
| 176155941 (Comments: 3) | Grass-snake (Discussed changesets: 62) | Спасибо за ответы! commented 2025-12-21 06:37:18 UTC by GlobalScan ♦9 |
| 176120561 (Comments: 4) | Nataniel Płusa (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-21 06:32:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176116454 (Comments: 2) | sivolk (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3037788583 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-12-21 06:32:44 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176116766 (Comments: 6) | sivolk (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2334230470 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-12-21 06:32:36 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 48375235 (Comments: 1) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi, surely the fences don't go through the buildings? commented 2025-12-21 06:32:13 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 176202543 (Comments: 1) | G00DG0LLY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice: An address is not a name. An address is not part of the street, it is part of the main building. Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/changeset/176205075 commented 2025-12-21 06:27:44 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176063266 (Comments: 2) | Misescapadaspornavarra-com (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Misescapadaspornavarra-com, this error still exits, can I get your feedback here? Guido commented 2025-12-21 06:23:39 UTC by gscholz ♦2,831 |
| 176204522 (Comments: 1) | willkmis (Discussed changesets: 18) | Add weekend variant to D96 and add stops to relation in Bethesda commented 2025-12-21 05:42:23 UTC by willkmis ♦193 |
| 176099775 (Comments: 2) | Piotr Proszowski (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-21 05:24:33 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176092319 (Comments: 1) | WWP Sierpc (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-21 05:12:41 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176088251 (Comments: 1) | isocial (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-21 05:12:35 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176090931 (Comments: 1) | nanzop (Discussed changesets: 34) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-12-21 05:12:29 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 148663376 (Comments: 3) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 9) | Think this sorts them all out: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176203918 commented 2025-12-21 04:39:58 UTC by shinterro ♦11 |
| 176202200 (Comments: 1) | F3Upchuck (Discussed changesets: 1) | osm is not the place for this political discourse https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176203869 commented 2025-12-21 04:30:17 UTC by John Kastner ♦53 |
| 176168773 (Comments: 1) | Paul Broom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. "How busy the bar is" would dictate when it closes, not when it opens.. The listed hours were taken from their website https://www.solasbar.com/location/solas-bar/ If those hours are old, they should've removed them from t... commented 2025-12-21 03:33:35 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,477 |
| 176163579 (Comments: 4) | Ash739 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The name is what I'm asking about, because if Extension isn't what is signed or part of the actual name, it shouldn't be included. commented 2025-12-21 03:28:50 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,445 |
| 176195297 (Comments: 1) | dsmntr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, Bitte keine random Werte für social_facility:for erfinden. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:social%20facility:for?uselang=de phone-Tag bitte im internationalen Format eintragen (führendes +49 anstatt 0) commented 2025-12-21 03:27:10 UTC by Bienson ♦367 |
| 176178994 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 86) | Improved with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176203026 commented 2025-12-21 03:12:55 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦81 |
| 166534222 (Comments: 1) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 127) | See note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5099138 ; Now that Route 6 is open (at least for this area), what is the status of those seemingly duplicate sliproads? Probably `was:highway=*` rather than `highway=construction`? commented 2025-12-21 03:06:53 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦81 |
 | 134428674 (Comments: 1) | igovorko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pozdrav, vidim da si označio ovaj put blizu Stobreča https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159243693/history/1 kao "private" za motorna vozila (što je ok), ali "permissive" za ostalo (dakle bicikli, pješice, i ... commented 2025-12-21 03:03:16 UTC by Matija Nalis ♦122 |
| 175535091 (Comments: 1) | Super-Jhempi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you deleted a no longer existing building which is good, but you did not reuse the existing building data correctly, because the footpritns now represent different ones than they did before. Look for a pattern, could a significant portion of exis... commented 2025-12-21 03:01:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 175847430 (Comments: 1) | lbuonanno@vauban (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you merged a POI representing a settlement to a building footprint. These features are not directly physically linked e.g. if this building were to no longer exist or if it moved that doesn't mean the settlement would too. I undid this. <... commented 2025-12-21 02:25:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 176201884 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 23) | Oops, in the changeset comments I meant to say "highway number (41>49)" because it's on Highway 49, though very close to Highway 41. commented 2025-12-21 01:46:43 UTC by TheNightRider ♦37 |
 | 176028732 (Comments: 3) | RLakhani (Discussed changesets: 30) | The rest I've changed them to residential areas. commented 2025-12-21 01:35:19 UTC by Jacksonville ♦26 |
| 18528769 (Comments: 1) | Natali1994 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2507821918/history has FIXME = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-21 01:35:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
 | 176184481 (Comments: 1) | Kay Delcross (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think I inadvertently set a bunch of them as ER instead of EIIR. From the Mapillary image, this looks like it's one of the new style boxes and looks like it does have a cypher so it'd likely be EIIR. commented 2025-12-21 01:34:02 UTC by dankarran ♦99 |
| 176159277 (Comments: 2) | alejandroscf (Discussed changesets: 4) | La rotonda no permite el paso peatonal, si no recuedo mal, no hay pasos de peatones ni acera. En las vías de acceso que si que hay acera en algunos tramos, ¿tal vez trunk_link o indicar las claves access correspondientes? commented 2025-12-21 01:16:02 UTC by alejandroscf ♦41 |
| 149739394 (Comments: 1) | meisoof (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi meisoof, These are bus LANES and should not be mapped separately unless there is a physical barrier between them and the rest of the road. You continue create separate roadways where they do not exist. Please review the OSM wiki https://wik... commented 2025-12-21 00:51:02 UTC by joel56dt ♦188 |
| 176117525 (Comments: 1) | Interactiondesigner (Discussed changesets: 15) | This is China, Only Chinese names can be written in "name=". Please write the English name in "name:en". commented 2025-12-21 00:43:12 UTC by Taksine ♦138 |
| 176194614 (Comments: 1) | esraa bahr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19196 commented 2025-12-21 00:27:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 176181245 (Comments: 1) | mai-3ali (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19195 commented 2025-12-21 00:17:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 176197700 (Comments: 1) | khadejahabdullah95 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19194 commented 2025-12-21 00:02:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 176186715 (Comments: 1) | hertipau (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, The opening hours you added are false, I corrected them here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176200511 best regards commented 2025-12-21 00:01:25 UTC by Hendrik Helsper ♦4 |
| 175991927 (Comments: 1) | Eraque22 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't move connections to the merge point. This changeset removed valid routes due to excessive intersection movement --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... commented 2025-12-20 23:57:27 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,144 |
| 176191941 (Comments: 2) | PiotrWierzbicki22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19193 commented 2025-12-20 23:37:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 175733570 (Comments: 2) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 346) | Hallo, De Kruidvat is de derde winkel vanaf het zuiden, niet de eerste. Dat is nummer 51. Openstreetmap geeft de daadwerkelijke wereld weer, geen papieren werkelijkheid. Als de gegevens van de Kruitvat zelf niet overeenkomen met de werk... commented 2025-12-20 23:22:39 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,041 |
| 169873075 (Comments: 1) | anautiyal_lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset reversed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419418835 and ignored impossible_oneway warnings --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169873075 ... commented 2025-12-20 23:14:17 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,144 |
| 176158707 (Comments: 1) | canofcatfood (Discussed changesets: 6) | These were tagged natural=wood which I have put back. The areas you have named are not the proper boundaries of the park and include parts of residents yards. Are you able to map the boundaries of the environmental park correctly and leave the woo... commented 2025-12-20 23:07:22 UTC by nevw ♦2,099 |
| 156034174 (Comments: 1) | Voxberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | In deze wijziging wordt de vervoerder ten onrechte aangepast van Keolis naar RRReis. RRReis is een merk, geen vervoerder. Ik heb het hersteld. commented 2025-12-20 23:07:21 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,041 |
| 171162077 (Comments: 1) | alokchauhan_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset reversed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187457715/history and ignored ID warnings for impossible_oneway --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171... commented 2025-12-20 23:04:56 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,144 |
| 175903829 (Comments: 4) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Znalazłem. Rozdzieliłem oznaczenie użytku eko i łąki jako rodzaju zagospodarowania, bo nie pokrywają 1:1. Muszę się tam jeszcze tylko wybrać by sprawdzić czy i jaka część łąki jest podmokła - na pewno nie cała. commented 2025-12-20 22:38:24 UTC by uprkos ♦80 |
| 176153378 (Comments: 5) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 30) | Nevienā likumā nav šādi teikts. Un pat, ja būtu, OSM kartē tikai to, kas faktiski eksistē nevis to, kam būtu jābūt. Es augstāk jau ieliku linku, kur CSN ir norādīts, kas ir un kas nav dzīvojamā zona. Un arī ieliku linkus gan vis... commented 2025-12-20 22:28:59 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 167743129 (Comments: 3) | R102 (Discussed changesets: 15) | i tu jesteś w błędzie , powinna być maksymalna wysokość całego budynku razem z wieżą ( bez anten ) powinno być 90 metrów Nad Trzebiatowem góruje niepodzielnie od wielu wieków wieża kościoła pod wezwaniem Macier... commented 2025-12-20 22:18:21 UTC by taxi301 ♦90 |
| 130998951 (Comments: 2) | t0n3t (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonsoir, je ne sais pas comment ça est arrivé, mais je constate que sur la boite à lettres (node/5373121304) l'opérateur est toujours ok. S'il s'agit d'une autre boite, je ne suis pas capable de la l... commented 2025-12-20 22:07:50 UTC by t0n3t ♦2 |
| 172416645 (Comments: 2) | Pontius (Discussed changesets: 6) | I'd guess it is an ecofriendly home goods shop. I'll update the tags. commented 2025-12-20 21:59:00 UTC by Pontius ♦39 |
| 165505280 (Comments: 3) | Mastrick_Mapper (Discussed changesets: 18) | Yeah, I'm not sure quay fully makes sense here either. I might just remove the embankment and leave it unadorned for now, which matches other areas I've seen like this. commented 2025-12-20 21:54:41 UTC by jwheare ♦2 |
| 174602156 (Comments: 2) | Валентин Ян (Discussed changesets: 43) | і причому зроблено на тяп-ляп, шопопало.. але аби зробить калейдоскоп. Коли замапиш весь Київ так потім будеш кожній будівлі ставить landuse? commented 2025-12-20 21:52:47 UTC by KKS ♦227 |
| 175503961 (Comments: 1) | Conrad_Longmore (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Just for info, you can check for gaps in relations by a site such as e.g. http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=19918287 and http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=19918287 . Best Regards, Andy commented 2025-12-20 21:52:26 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,591 |
| 176191083 (Comments: 4) | Molker (Discussed changesets: 33) | For this relation RAB 144 Gleiwitz-Krakau were ca. 30 km in construction, mainly cutting trees, and some movement of the top soil. I removed the 29 as well. commented 2025-12-20 21:47:50 UTC by Molker ♦23 |
| 176187674 (Comments: 1) | alx (Discussed changesets: 3) | это скорее loc_name (если ещё в ходу) или old_name commented 2025-12-20 21:45:52 UTC by HantDX ♦43 |
| 176197635 (Comments: 1) | john mcjohnathon (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://imgur.com/a/aicppKH source commented 2025-12-20 21:44:45 UTC by john mcjohnathon ♦1 |
| 172794301 (Comments: 1) | shifattest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, questa strada non esiste o mi sbaglio? Cosa volevi fare? commented 2025-12-20 21:38:11 UTC by eagle314 ♦4 |
| 175162655 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197483 commented 2025-12-20 21:34:56 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175161670 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197483 commented 2025-12-20 21:34:56 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175157688 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197483 commented 2025-12-20 21:34:56 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175194252 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197483 commented 2025-12-20 21:34:56 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 174906893 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197483 commented 2025-12-20 21:34:55 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 174904622 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197483 commented 2025-12-20 21:34:55 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 176144496 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391 commented 2025-12-20 21:31:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 176058475 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391 commented 2025-12-20 21:31:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175719085 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391 commented 2025-12-20 21:31:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 176148984 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391 commented 2025-12-20 21:31:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175358560 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391 commented 2025-12-20 21:31:06 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175208851 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391 commented 2025-12-20 21:31:06 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175357540 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391 commented 2025-12-20 21:31:06 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175707949 (Comments: 1) | ВЕЛИЗАРИЙ (Discussed changesets: 17) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391 commented 2025-12-20 21:31:06 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 176052464 (Comments: 1) | sintaung (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Currently, the NCN1 here is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/254838#map=11/57.6573/-3.2677 , and the EV1 is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2763769#map=12/57.6646/-3.2667 . Should more of the ways that are in NCN1 also be in E... commented 2025-12-20 21:22:25 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,591 |
| 176155137 (Comments: 1) | DaniMatev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравейте! Можете да коригирате годината от датата на проверка(check_date). Също така, препоръчително е когато съборените сгради съществува... commented 2025-12-20 21:21:22 UTC by Fraxi ♦205 |
| 176179161 (Comments: 2) | Itay Grudev (Discussed changesets: 3) | Имах предвид https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness#Smoothness под третата колона ("Usable by") commented 2025-12-20 21:10:16 UTC by Fraxi ♦205 |
| 169173193 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 80) | Don't blindly delete important parts of relations without respecting notes and instructions about the current local situation if you don't have any local knowledge! commented 2025-12-20 20:56:45 UTC by Makeena ♦47 |
 | 175961691 (Comments: 1) | Martin K (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dobrý den, je tento úsek opravu označen jako I/35? Geoportál ŘSD jej označuje jako nájezd na dálnici (a tedy nikoliv silnici 1. třídy). Můžu vás případně poprosit o nějaký zdr... commented 2025-12-20 20:49:54 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦230 |
| 176180604 (Comments: 1) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 288) | Wyrazy współczucia dla sąsiadów commented 2025-12-20 20:42:12 UTC by IreuN ♦80 |
| 175538178 (Comments: 1) | CanopyFalls (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I think you added some non-buildings here. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution... commented 2025-12-20 20:38:02 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 176170038 (Comments: 1) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 30) | Vai šim posmam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831170641 tagad ir uzliktas veloceļa zīmes? Jo vēl augusta beigās nebija. Cik zinu, te vienmēr ir bijis iztrūkstošs posms. commented 2025-12-20 20:26:29 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 176163511 (Comments: 4) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 78) | sound good commented 2025-12-20 20:17:55 UTC by cubbe8 ♦70 |
| 164122224 (Comments: 1) | ÖA-RAW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo ÖA-RAW, da die Herbstdult längst vorbei ist, habe ich den Mariahilfplatz wieder in den Normalzustand zurückversetzt. Wenn man solche temporäre Veranstaltungen kartiert, bitte hinterher wieder auf den Normalzustand ... commented 2025-12-20 20:12:24 UTC by Rainero ♦602 |
| 176152772 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 197) | Jest to normalnie droga krajowa 44, konkretnie DK44c, kilometraż do 1+400. Niczym się nie różni od dalszej części obwodnicy. https://drogi.gddkia.gov.pl/mapy/mapa-informacji-drogowej commented 2025-12-20 20:08:56 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦298 |
| 175891052 (Comments: 3) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 137) | Hmm, jednak prześwit między Mleczną a sufitem jest spory i dużo większy niż tunel obok. Ziemia jest ale też nie od samej krawędzi, ta ścieżka moim zdaniem jest typowo na moście bo idzie się po betonie przy barierce commented 2025-12-20 20:08:39 UTC by zuicz ♦294 |
| 176186955 (Comments: 3) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 30) | `traffic_signals:direction` luksoforiem uz ceļiem tiek lietots, lai norādītu, kurš galvenais luksofors attiecas kuram braukšanas virzienam transportlīdzekļu un gājēju navigācijai. Ar to nenorāda atkārtotus un papildus luksofor... commented 2025-12-20 20:07:15 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 175312896 (Comments: 2) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 10) | No reply, so I filled in the gap again in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194664 . commented 2025-12-20 19:58:55 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,591 |
| 176186330 (Comments: 3) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 30) | Tad punkts ir jānomaina uz pareizām birkām, kā piemēram `amenity=events_venue` ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Devents_venue ) . Pēc https://visit.jelgava.lv/lv/sv-trisvienibas-tornis/vestures-ekspozicijas skatoties, ... commented 2025-12-20 19:54:10 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 176044344 (Comments: 1) | NTTrailsLSE (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello, There's still a bit of a gap in section 2 of the London LOOP: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3308902#map=15/51.40058/0.08141 . Previously it ran on this alighnment: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hBx . Best Regards, Andy |
| 176081949 (Comments: 2) | Pooh01 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Dzięki za czujność - wrzuciłem building=supermarket i zapomniałem o shop. Poprawione! commented 2025-12-20 19:47:25 UTC by Pooh01 ♦24 |
| 176194169 (Comments: 1) | vipwebdesign (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merged info with addressnode. Please select the present addressnode Greetz, eggie commented 2025-12-20 19:44:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 173922195 (Comments: 2) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 153) | Thanks. I fixed it now. commented 2025-12-20 19:42:55 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦230 |
| 176158667 (Comments: 1) | PiotrWierzbicki22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194151 commented 2025-12-20 19:41:02 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176158793 (Comments: 1) | PiotrWierzbicki22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194116 commented 2025-12-20 19:39:35 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176191751 (Comments: 1) | PiotrWierzbicki22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194081 commented 2025-12-20 19:38:22 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176193284 (Comments: 2) | Eef de Vries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb man_made pier teruggezet als vlak met area=yes en retaining_wall verwijderd. Evt. kun je die apart toevoegen. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-20 19:37:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176191871 (Comments: 1) | PiotrWierzbicki22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194028 commented 2025-12-20 19:36:50 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 175927810 (Comments: 2) | TornadoFang (Discussed changesets: 12) | Es besteht durchaus die Möglichkeit, dass dies zutrifft. Ich kann mich allerdings nicht daran erinnern. Ich bemühe mich stets, das zu vermeiden. commented 2025-12-20 19:33:03 UTC by TornadoFang ♦7 |
| 175848948 (Comments: 1) | eportal@vauban (Discussed changesets: 1) | A task boundary is just a conceptual boundary; if a feature like one of the buildings you mapped here crosses it just map the entire building. If it's a larger feature like a landuse are or highway map just beyond the task boundary so that other... commented 2025-12-20 19:32:10 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 175848809 (Comments: 1) | sviolette@vauban (Discussed changesets: 2) | A task boundary is just a conceptual boundary; if a feature like one of the buildings you mapped here crosses it just map the entire building. If it's a larger feature like a landuse are or highway map just beyond the task boundary so that other... commented 2025-12-20 19:32:02 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 96084022 (Comments: 1) | patman37 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Tourne à gauche plus important (résidentiel) que l'allée suivant (Allée Golda Meyer, voie de parking), est-ce bien raisonnable ? commented 2025-12-20 19:26:42 UTC by trial ♦1,005 |
| 176128100 (Comments: 1) | Janusz121 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-20 19:24:50 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 80316398 (Comments: 2) | utvonalfelmeresek (Discussed changesets: 44) | Nem tudom már mi volt 6 évvel ezelőtt, gondolom a pozíció lehet pontosítandó, mert a mapillary-s képek nem elég egyértelműen mutatják a helyet: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?... commented 2025-12-20 19:24:33 UTC by utvonalfelmeresek ♦22 |
| 176193643 (Comments: 1) | Janusz121 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-20 19:24:25 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 165034478 (Comments: 1) | Ville de Saint-Martin de Seignanx (Discussed changesets: 3) | bonjour j'ai l'impression qu'il y a eu un "couac" lors de l'enregistrement des horaires ici... Chaque jour est dans un tag différent... - opening_hours - opening_hours:signed - opening_hours:url |
| 176149646 (Comments: 1) | AliKarabulut1956 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Merhaba. Yerleşim yerlerinin içindeki yollara highway=track etiketi koymanızın yanlış olduğunu düşünüyorum. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track#How_to_decide commented 2025-12-20 19:18:40 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦191 |
| 175753044 (Comments: 2) | Sergejs Zikins (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sveiki vēlreiz, Privāti ar Jūsu kolēģi aprunājām par avotiem un autortiesībām, bet priekš OSM šeit ir tik un tā jānorāda avots un licence. Tā kā pagājis jau laiks bez atbildes, tad pagaidām šo izmaiņu atce... commented 2025-12-20 19:17:29 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 176175822 (Comments: 1) | AliKarabulut1956 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Merhaba. Değişiklik açıklamalarınıza neleri değiştirdiğini yazabilir misiniz? "." koymanız değişikliğinizde neler olduğu hakkında hiçbir fikir vermiyor. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_c... commented 2025-12-20 19:14:44 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦191 |
| 176009572 (Comments: 1) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 8) | Valid deletion, all footpritns added represent buildings, if you could map the slightly smaller going forward that'd be great. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from oth... commented 2025-12-20 19:11:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 176009393 (Comments: 1) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 8) | Your deletion of the round footprint on the left was valid, becasue it represented vegetation. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176009393 commented 2025-12-20 19:10:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 175817684 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Olugbenga Fajuyitan (Discussed changesets: 2) | This footprint likely repersents a building, but it's oversized. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175817684 commented 2025-12-20 19:08:45 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 175817320 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Olugbenga Fajuyitan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them w... commented 2025-12-20 19:08:10 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 9723841 (Comments: 2) | rurseekatze (Discussed changesets: 35) | Kannst du mir sagen, was section bedeutet? commented 2025-12-20 19:06:10 UTC by Znaika ♦130 |
| 176105157 (Comments: 2) | comfyquiettree (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ahojky, díky za přidání layer - předpokládala jsem, že když je otagován tunnel, tak bude i správně layer. Přijde i ovšem, že odstr. bridge je zde správný krok. Minimá... commented 2025-12-20 18:58:35 UTC by comfyquiettree ♦37 |
| 176010217 (Comments: 1) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, several of these footprints represent yards. If you think something is a building with a complex shape, then double check that it is in fact a building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your con... commented 2025-12-20 18:52:47 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 175563322 (Comments: 9) | AF HAF KARTOGRAF (Discussed changesets: 27) | Prague has 112 cadastral areas, not 108. commented 2025-12-20 18:46:52 UTC by AF HAF KARTOGRAF ♦68 |
| 174258087 (Comments: 5) | CharlotFR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pour info, il existe Panoramax comme alternative à Google Street View et c'est compatible avec ODBL/OSM https://explore.panoramax.fr/?s=fp;s2;p4916f76b-7ea1-4875-856b-593baf1afef8;c0.03/-6.81/30;m17/46.311747/-0.477848) commented 2025-12-20 18:46:19 UTC by Cayenne17 ♦20 |
| 160399183 (Comments: 1) | BevinBash (Discussed changesets: 1) | I ended up getting unjustly fired... Never do more for a corporation than they'd be willing to do for you. Unfortunately, I gave them more than they ever intended to give to me, and I regret my naivety more than I could convey. commented 2025-12-20 18:39:15 UTC by BevinBash ♦1 |
| 162583847 (Comments: 1) | le_geo_urb (Discussed changesets: 24) | Bonjour, Aujourd'hui, j'ai ouvert une note sur cette parcelle car je ne voyais pas les bâtiments. En effet, les bâtiments y sont toujours, je trouve dommage d'autant anticiper les travaux puisque ce changeset date de 10 ... commented 2025-12-20 18:35:20 UTC by Cdrik_69 ♦29 |
| 176114535 (Comments: 6) | Jtom64 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, kein Problem, aller Anfang ist schwer! Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-20 18:32:51 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176173345 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 86) | It turns out, vehicles can do a (special) u-turn to turn towards the Prince Edward Road East bridge. afaik there are basically no intersections in HK where a non-dedicated u-turn is required to get to a destination. Earlier I did not know/noti... commented 2025-12-20 18:31:02 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦81 |
| 176183723 (Comments: 1) | thunderberry (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, das "Unterflur" gehört nicht in den Namen und passt nicht zu fire_hydrant:type Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-20 18:30:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176070674 (Comments: 1) | Hedgie8 (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted - blind following of iD suggestions which are often faulty, e.g. not all Bank of Georgia branches are branded as Solo, TBC payment terminals actually accept coins etc. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176192029 commented 2025-12-20 18:28:55 UTC by yelisey90 ♦219 |
| 176184058 (Comments: 1) | thunderberry (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, wie bereits geschrieben: Hydranten haben keine Namen. Da hier auch weiterhin im Raum steht, dass es sich um die Namen natürlicher Personen handelt, behalte ich mir die Löschung vor. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-20 18:27:46 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176187421 (Comments: 2) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Wydanie ZnRID to nie rozpoczęcie budowy - wykonawca nie wszedł jeszcze na plac budowy i żadne prace w terenie się nie zaczęły. commented 2025-12-20 18:27:33 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦717 |
| 176191858 (Comments: 1) | kadiwa (Discussed changesets: 7) | Anmerkung: Es gibt bestimmt irgendein korrektes Taggingschema, um Haltestellen als Flächen oder als Linien zu kartieren, aber ich wüsste nicht wie. Das, was hier eingetragen war, ergab auf jeden Fall keinen Sinn. commented 2025-12-20 18:25:43 UTC by kadiwa ♦57 |
| 176187254 (Comments: 1) | Hedgie8 (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted - blind following of iD suggestions which are often faulty, e.g. not all Bank of Georgia branches are branded as Solo, TBC ATMs actually accept coins etc. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176191893 commented 2025-12-20 18:24:43 UTC by yelisey90 ♦219 |
| 176182381 (Comments: 1) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 84) | Thank you. commented 2025-12-20 18:17:25 UTC by gschetrit ♦1 |
| 176088019 (Comments: 3) | lucygrse (Discussed changesets: 5) | J'ai vu que ces tags ne sont plus utilisés. Je comprend la suppression mais cela aurait été plus clair avec un commentaire. Merci :) commented 2025-12-20 18:08:26 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 175293704 (Comments: 3) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi willkmis, feel free to follow your rationale, it's better than the previous road hierarchy that was here. But yeah, 2-3 weeks ago, I was trying to find a good template to standardize the road classification in San Diego County and I had set n... commented 2025-12-20 17:53:46 UTC by Yushclay ♦17 |
| 176190824 (Comments: 1) | jodd (Discussed changesets: 24) | Erledigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176190824 commented 2025-12-20 17:52:11 UTC by jodd ♦122 |
| 176083373 (Comments: 1) | Paul Racanière (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, La ligne de bus Noctilien N11: Château de Vincennes → Pont de Neuilly (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1086442#map=17/48.845690/2.427839) GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector permet de visualiser la discontinuité avec le li... commented 2025-12-20 17:38:02 UTC by michel60 ♦94 |
| 176190357 (Comments: 1) | binmo (Discussed changesets: 2) | scrub for now* commented 2025-12-20 17:37:41 UTC by binmo ♦2 |
| 176155492 (Comments: 1) | OrdepH22 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, all footprints you mapped here represent buildings, thanks for moving the one to also align with imagery. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommen... commented 2025-12-20 17:32:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 175772215 (Comments: 1) | TornadoFang (Discussed changesets: 12) | Moin, ich habe deine tags der Ladestation geeändert bzw. ergänzt - könntest du als Muster für die Ladestation am Netto-Parkplatz verwenden. commented 2025-12-20 17:30:07 UTC by werbuli ♦14 |
| 175375740 (Comments: 2) | CanopyFalls (Discussed changesets: 3) | No worries, glad to hear! Was going a bit insane trying to find out what was wrong. commented 2025-12-20 17:29:27 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦27 |
| 175720534 (Comments: 1) | kevjs1982 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Kevjs, what do you constitute as a highway=living_street? To me, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293856219 appears to be a standard driveway. commented 2025-12-20 17:13:38 UTC by Aethonatic ♦21 |
| 175761208 (Comments: 1) | Lemon Myrtle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped: * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings int... commented 2025-12-20 17:09:51 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176088047 (Comments: 3) | lucygrse (Discussed changesets: 5) | Et mettre des sources ! commented 2025-12-20 17:05:50 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
 | 176075577 (Comments: 2) | Chrysoberyl5A- aireen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Should be fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176121116 commented 2025-12-20 16:57:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176187014 (Comments: 1) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176188731#map=13/49.97350/19.04355 Taka zmiana kategorii musi zostać przedyskutowana na forum. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-20 16:53:26 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
 | 176150252 (Comments: 1) | NETH-JAN (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, siempre que tengas el nombre del "barrio" puedes añadirlo, así ayuda mucho a los que quieren identificar un barrio en específico más allá de las calles. los barrios en el centro del mismo con un &quo... commented 2025-12-20 16:40:23 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,617 |
| 175528758 (Comments: 1) | Johannes Titor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. Best regards commented 2025-12-20 16:39:54 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176147614 (Comments: 1) | NETH-JAN (Discussed changesets: 2) | hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el mapa en Bolivia! commented 2025-12-20 16:37:10 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,617 |
| 176105842 (Comments: 2) | etgg (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi there, the areas tagged to the east were labelled heath hence the changes , but have changed back to grassland now. Thanks, commented 2025-12-20 16:33:59 UTC by etgg ♦18 |
| 175435406 (Comments: 1) | Aprillia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please follow next time the rooflines more accurately. You often draw just a rectangle over an object, ignoring corners and extensions. Best regards commented 2025-12-20 16:31:25 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 174061645 (Comments: 1) | RomaKasian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Навіщо там secondary? На знімках це схоже на звичайний track commented 2025-12-20 16:28:13 UTC by mike140 ♦361 |
| 175645484 (Comments: 1) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 44) | W osm nie używamy skrótów w nazwach, więc ta poprawka, niestety, jest błędna. commented 2025-12-20 16:24:33 UTC by Yunkers ♦410 |
 | 175970285 (Comments: 4) | ljc_jlyb (Discussed changesets: 22) | Thanks for that commented 2025-12-20 16:24:25 UTC by ljc_jlyb ♦44 |
| 176187114 (Comments: 1) | khadejahabdullah95 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi khadejahabdullah95, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 96 building(s) - 96 name(s) Coul... commented 2025-12-20 16:13:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 155575584 (Comments: 1) | KanjiasDev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Du hattest den Namen BOC vergessen einzutragen, habe ich heute mal nachgeholt. commented 2025-12-20 16:10:26 UTC by chris66 ♦433 |
| 164817286 (Comments: 2) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 102) | Oups. Bonjour Simon, Je regarde cette note réactivée https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4977055 Il y a beaucou de B54. Je vois qu’on n’était pas très constant (méla... commented 2025-12-20 16:01:12 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦50 |
| 176181756 (Comments: 1) | Giopogib (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Giopogib Benvenuto in OSM! In merito al tuo recente edit su questo edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460030928 ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti... commented 2025-12-20 15:44:07 UTC by demon_box ♦376 |
| 176181553 (Comments: 1) | Corsa5 (Discussed changesets: 154) | их, не успел :) так держать !! commented 2025-12-20 15:28:53 UTC by pfg21 ♦132 |
 | 176184967 (Comments: 1) | israaaljaloudi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please leave a comment describing your changes to facilitate understanding and follow-up. Thank you for your contribution. commented 2025-12-20 15:24:17 UTC by VLD0251 ♦11 |
 | 176179479 (Comments: 1) | مراجع محمد الفاخري (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please leave a comment describing your changes to facilitate understanding and follow-up. Thank you for your contribution commented 2025-12-20 15:23:06 UTC by VLD0251 ♦11 |
| 176139228 (Comments: 1) | Hilbert S (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hilbert De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-20 15:21:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176139838 (Comments: 1) | Hilbert S (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Hilbert, Feedback: Het gebouw staat nu op commercial... Wanneer dat niet klopt kun je er ook gewoon yes van maken. Bedoel je dat. Het is wel een lange naam? MVG eggie commented 2025-12-20 15:20:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176169153 (Comments: 1) | Wonderful Alligator (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hoi.. Je vraagt feedback. Je zou specifiek kunnen taggen. Dus building=shed ipv yes MVG eggie commented 2025-12-20 15:17:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176180838 (Comments: 1) | NeedForComplete (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-20 15:14:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176171081 (Comments: 3) | OvdLeur (Discussed changesets: 11) | De notitie is bedoeld om foutieve wijzigingen naar bicycle=use_sidepath te voorkomen. En zo te zien is deze dus wel nodig... De tag note is bedoeld voor andere mappers, niet voor eindgebruikers. commented 2025-12-20 15:10:42 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,041 |
| 176172455 (Comments: 1) | MeruBT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, "pharmacy" is a generic term and should not be used as a name please only enter the official, verifiable name or leave the field blank. thank you for your contribution commented 2025-12-20 15:09:31 UTC by VLD0251 ♦11 |
| 176181011 (Comments: 1) | Thunichgud (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Thunichgud, die vorher eingetragene Farbe #0098a1 wurde von der HVV-Webseite genommen. Zu finden z. B. in diesem SVG: https://cloud.geofox.de/icon/linename?name=U4&outlined=true&fileFormat=SVG&height=14&appearance=COL... commented 2025-12-20 14:59:26 UTC by kadiwa ♦57 |
| 175815272 (Comments: 2) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Also, are you positive way/1457853950 exists? The southern entry of the culvert has no visible trace in aerial footage commented 2025-12-20 14:32:42 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦678 |
| 176180729 (Comments: 1) | vipwebdesign (Discussed changesets: 3) | Het bedrijf stond al op de kaart. De verder info heb ik samengevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-20 14:14:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176150432 (Comments: 2) | gschetrit (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've reconnected it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176182381 commented 2025-12-20 14:12:57 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦678 |
| 176177505 (Comments: 1) | Tarqq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-20 14:12:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 169773928 (Comments: 1) | 2912clover (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I assume you added these beaches for Pokemon Go? https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413 I have reverted all your changesets, please only add beaches where there is a beach. Please do not vandalise OS... commented 2025-12-20 14:10:37 UTC by ntzm ♦44 |
| 176109525 (Comments: 3) | RoseBTCmap (Discussed changesets: 3) | thanks for the quick response happy mapping commented 2025-12-20 14:05:03 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 175715692 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi there I noticed that you added landuse in this changeset and connecetd it to the sourrounding highways. This used to be done "in the olden days" of OSM but it is not good practice today. Please don't glue landuse to hi... commented 2025-12-20 14:04:31 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 175087492 (Comments: 2) | Tom Ameye (Discussed changesets: 101) | Good question. I have completed the map, but this part along the Molenbeek is not publicly accessible as far as I know. commented 2025-12-20 14:01:03 UTC by Tom Ameye ♦60 |
| 170757173 (Comments: 3) | Siva SaiKrishna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry for raising the issue. I corrected my mistake, as Grama Panchayat is found to be separate from Sachivalayam. commented 2025-12-20 14:01:01 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦612 |
| 90223985 (Comments: 1) | mabeileiok (Discussed changesets: 1) | 看样子又把O当成测试网站了，记录。 commented 2025-12-20 13:35:17 UTC by Taksine ♦138 |
| 176139885 (Comments: 2) | Muttonmoelle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks a lot for the advice. I'll make sure to change this commented 2025-12-20 13:33:35 UTC by Muttonmoelle ♦1 |
| 175868216 (Comments: 2) | nmaruichi (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:razed:railway には、確かに必須に書かれています。 色々調べてみると、元の編集には問題があると思います。 まず、この razed:railway キーの wikiページに... commented 2025-12-20 13:26:41 UTC by nmaruichi ♦7 |
| 175193880 (Comments: 4) | ivandhfr (Discussed changesets: 2) | The links you provided weren’t my edits, though. I just checked this particular changeset, and I can confirm that the buildings have tiny gaps between them, even though they appear connected in Carto. Thanks for the tip, by the way. commented 2025-12-20 12:53:54 UTC by ivandhfr ♦3 |
| 175461638 (Comments: 2) | Fan map 2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ou, już zmieniam, byłem pewien że dobrze zastosowałem lifecycle prefix. Ogólnie zmapowane stacje "stacjonarne" (bo istniały również wirtualne strefy zwrotu) to były zwykłe stojaki rowerowe, które zostały... commented 2025-12-20 12:35:30 UTC by Fan map 2 ♦14 |
| 176178796 (Comments: 1) | Henry572 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Siehe auch https://www.duesseldorf.de/aktuelles/news/detailansicht/newsdetail/der-ersatzneubau-der-gemeinschaftsgrundschule-vennhauser-allee-ist-eingeweiht commented 2025-12-20 12:30:16 UTC by Henry572 ♦126 |
| 176178049 (Comments: 1) | Henry572 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Siehe auch https://ris-duesseldorf.itk-rheinland.de/sessionnetduebi/vo0050.asp?__kvonr=100938 commented 2025-12-20 12:26:05 UTC by Henry572 ♦126 |
| 156531223 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 98) | Has the bridge construction been completed? The Strava heat map shows activiity but that could just mean that the bridge was open to pedestrian/bike traffic during construction commented 2025-12-20 12:23:20 UTC by dannmer ♦30 |
| 175581525 (Comments: 2) | Bierphysik (Discussed changesets: 21) | jop, danke für den hinweis commented 2025-12-20 12:22:38 UTC by Bierphysik ♦94 |
 | 176171955 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 915) | Hi, I agree that especially for short operator names there might be the risk of conflicts. However, the scheme without 'operator' is by far the most common scheme. However, if there is some discussion you have my full support for &quo... commented 2025-12-20 12:19:16 UTC by mueschel ♦6,771 |
| 176152602 (Comments: 1) | cf100clunk (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please check https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-116.30614&lat=49.10096&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments... commented 2025-12-20 12:16:34 UTC by kartler175 ♦568 |
| 176091807 (Comments: 3) | GlobalScan (Discussed changesets: 8) | Здравствуйте. Ок. Исправил "addr:hamlet" на "addr:city", раз уж такая традиция). И убрал тег "population" с границы деревни, исправил числ... commented 2025-12-20 12:13:36 UTC by GlobalScan ♦9 |
| 176177736 (Comments: 1) | mai-3ali (Discussed changesets: 2) | -2185- commented 2025-12-20 12:07:32 UTC by mai-3ali ♦1 |
| 175673031 (Comments: 5) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 33) | I'm not very comfortable with date namespaces. The chosen format, TAG:DATE-DATE, is both imprecise (no month, no day) and unusable for querying and data processing. Furthermore, we already have start_date:namespace for that. However, on r... commented 2025-12-20 12:04:38 UTC by Arflha ♦22 |
| 176172410 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi again: I made some edits to this block so you can see how it's usually mapped. We normally don't add addresses to shop and entrance nodes if the building they are in already has an address. Only on staircase entrances we add the entrance... commented 2025-12-20 12:04:07 UTC by rhhs ♦173 |
| 168887293 (Comments: 2) | BradBretelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please do. I intended to move it to the corner below number 134, where the shop is. I thought I cancelled the update. commented 2025-12-20 12:02:11 UTC by BradBretelle ♦2 |
| 176161137 (Comments: 7) | bkleipool (Discussed changesets: 8) | Je kunt ook evt aanhaken in dit 'draadje' uit 2023 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/announcement-openairportmap/8675/80 commented 2025-12-20 12:01:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175323187 (Comments: 1) | Zaki Racaniere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should have their corners squared. * Buildings should not overlap other buildings and features. Keep o... commented 2025-12-20 11:50:26 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176150436 (Comments: 2) | Les2randonneurs (Discussed changesets: 1) | deleted --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176150436 commented 2025-12-20 11:49:28 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 175558419 (Comments: 1) | SimoCattaben (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings shou... commented 2025-12-20 11:46:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176047873 (Comments: 5) | Rob8622 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi.. Op de standaardkaart zit vaak je cache nog in de weg. Dan CTRL-F5 paar keer toetsen. Andere layers zijn niet direct uptodate en dat kan wel een weekje of langer duren. Dat geldt ook voor afgeleide apps als OSM en Komoot. Dan is he... commented 2025-12-20 11:41:25 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175940538 (Comments: 1) | cnvery (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello, For the record, names in Australia are in English by default. There is no need to add "English translations" by duplicating the exact same data. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017037544/history You added "n... commented 2025-12-20 11:40:36 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,678 |
| 101585268 (Comments: 1) | Michal_01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ahoj, zavoru na node 6932246603 si umiestnil nespravne - nie je priamo na krizovatke. Zablovala sa tym cesta na vsetky smery. Opravil som. commented 2025-12-20 11:37:47 UTC by Tomas_J ♦317 |
| 175433630 (Comments: 1) | Aprillia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-20 11:37:08 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176172441 (Comments: 3) | GregTman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik stuur het even door naar een van de OV mappers. commented 2025-12-20 11:35:39 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 166100527 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 125) | hey mateusz, yes it's a typo, fixed now commented 2025-12-20 11:31:50 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦429 |
| 164878282 (Comments: 4) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 125) | thanks! sorry i missed that very last sentance somehow. done now: https://osm.org/changeset/176176211 commented 2025-12-20 11:30:14 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦429 |
| 176087172 (Comments: 2) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 16) | Szia! Köszi az észrevételt! Ebben az esetben akkor címkézhetem úgy, hogy building:use=boulder? Mert erre vonatkozó opciót nem találtam a legördülő listában. |
| 176170733 (Comments: 2) | KirstenPNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted by changeset #176175926 due to wrong interpretation access=no on roads. commented 2025-12-20 11:21:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175268748 (Comments: 3) | CoyKoi (Discussed changesets: 32) | done finally. had to wait for AT to delete the old stops from the GTFS trips - https://osm.org/changeset/176174998 - https://osm.org/changeset/176175825 - https://osm.org/changeset/176175650 commented 2025-12-20 11:19:41 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦429 |
| 176170868 (Comments: 1) | KirstenPNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted by changeset #176175838 due to wrong interpretation access=no on roads. commented 2025-12-20 11:19:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176170934 (Comments: 1) | KirstenPNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Van welk punt is de Hollandiaweg private? MVG eggie commented 2025-12-20 11:17:41 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 148288004 (Comments: 1) | devanshsinghiitbhu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11697055500/history has shop = sweet that was added in this edit shop=sweet ? What kind of shop, if any is here? is it shop=confectionery ? or is something else matching? See https://wiki.ope... commented 2025-12-20 11:17:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 148234180 (Comments: 1) | Divyansh_seth_IITBHU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11693100773/history has shop = sweet that was added in this edit shop=sweet ? What kind of shop, if any is here? is it shop=confectionery ? or is something else matching? See https://wiki.ope... commented 2025-12-20 11:16:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176135940 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 12) | This office still exists! the sign is in Latin script, though, not in Cyrillic commented 2025-12-20 11:15:36 UTC by rhhs ♦173 |
| 176171005 (Comments: 2) | KirstenPNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted by changeset #176175739 commented 2025-12-20 11:15:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176135936 (Comments: 2) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 12) | You also incorrectly changed the opening hours of the alcohol shop... :( commented 2025-12-20 11:13:12 UTC by rhhs ♦173 |
| 176139354 (Comments: 2) | victorelgueta (Discussed changesets: 14) | Buenos días, vale, entendido. commented 2025-12-20 10:59:29 UTC by victorelgueta ♦11 |
| 176169241 (Comments: 2) | cnvery (Discussed changesets: 42) | Edits are spread out, with some in the United Kingdom, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Please keep changesets local. commented 2025-12-20 10:53:27 UTC by Aethonatic ♦21 |
| X | 159191712 (Comments: 2) | Tracerneo (Discussed changesets: 1) | To answer your question re. =toys: Absolutely not. It's a miniature store, not a toy store. More appropriate tag may be shop=model It is mentioned in https://miniatures.org/sites/miniatures.org/files/MJ15Gazettevol43no5.pdf (Miniature Gazette... commented 2025-12-20 10:49:06 UTC by Tracerneo ♦1 |
| 175796975 (Comments: 1) | Matthieu HUGOT (Discussed changesets: 4) | Il y aussi un sens de circulation pour les piétons ? commented 2025-12-20 10:44:07 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦243 |
| 176160117 (Comments: 2) | wandelzot (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Wandelzot, Dergelijke "massawijzigingen" bespreek je beter vooraf even met de Belgische community. Er zijn verschillende manieren om in contact te komen, het chatkanaal is de meest rechtstreekse, zie https://openstreetmap.be/contact.... commented 2025-12-20 10:35:02 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦419 |
| 176174267 (Comments: 1) | lenoxys (Discussed changesets: 1) | Le truc c'est que si je ferme l'accès de la route de la Hilliere, c'est tout la route qui est fermée au véhicule motorisé et pas qu'un seul segment. commented 2025-12-20 10:34:48 UTC by lenoxys ♦1 |
| 176149662 (Comments: 1) | wandelzot (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hoi, voor bulk-edits zoals deze vragen we voorafgaand overleg, omdat het te makkelijk is er schade mee aan te richten. Deze zullen dus worden teruggedraaid. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits commented 2025-12-20 10:34:31 UTC by M!dgard ♦808 |
| 176152210 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 319) | Powinieneś się zapytać tego użytkownika skąd w ogóle wziął info o otwarciu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176145737 commented 2025-12-20 10:26:47 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦838 |
| 175520095 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 33) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. * Bu... commented 2025-12-20 10:24:43 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176173681 (Comments: 1) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 152) | Also some addresses in Kortrijk were set to Ghent which, in light of the earlier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176160001, reeks of vandalism commented 2025-12-20 10:20:37 UTC by M!dgard ♦808 |
| 176160001 (Comments: 1) | wandelzot (Discussed changesets: 8) | Vandalisme teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176173549 commented 2025-12-20 10:16:44 UTC by M!dgard ♦808 |
| 157289583 (Comments: 2) | sqrt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Eingetragen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32354671/history/18 commented 2025-12-20 10:10:16 UTC by sqrt ♦2 |
| 175720461 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Brunner DE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176172614 commented 2025-12-20 09:54:19 UTC by whb ♦639 |
| 175667138 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Brunner DE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176172409 commented 2025-12-20 09:53:51 UTC by whb ♦639 |
| 175061785 (Comments: 1) | SHB2000 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Have the M1 signs gone up yet? My voice recording from 17 November has this as still A1 (I haven't been back since then). commented 2025-12-20 09:37:24 UTC by mrpulley ♦234 |
| 176154358 (Comments: 3) | R0bbert (Discussed changesets: 13) | 👍 Thank you commented 2025-12-20 09:34:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
 | 176171943 (Comments: 1) | Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (Discussed changesets: 44) | Glædelig jul og ja, jeg kan også være doven og genbruger og genanvender derfor mine tekster til rettelse og ændrings loggen. commented 2025-12-20 09:33:42 UTC by Jacob Rosendal Kristensen ♦8 |
| 176170387 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 15) | Are you sure about the `ele=`? Out-of-copyright maps say otherwise. commented 2025-12-20 09:33:33 UTC by kingkingHK ♦52 |
| 176011534 (Comments: 1) | fmc_3 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Stimmt hier "parking:right:psv:conditional" wirklich? 'psv' schließt Taxis mit ein, die damit rund um die Uhr dort parken dürfen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102612746 commented 2025-12-20 09:26:45 UTC by mueschel ♦6,771 |
| 176156486 (Comments: 1) | TejashreeD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176160091 commented 2025-12-20 09:19:46 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176156630 (Comments: 2) | TejashreeD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176160091 Thanks, impiaaa commented 2025-12-20 09:19:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176168803 (Comments: 2) | randomaper (Discussed changesets: 4) | там же даже на сайте видно, что они мясом торгуют commented 2025-12-20 09:15:52 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| X | 175894283 (Comments: 2) | Осетр (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175907421 commented 2025-12-20 09:14:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| X | 175153149 (Comments: 2) | au-btcmap‑onboarding (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175154787 commented 2025-12-20 09:13:50 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| X | 175287211 (Comments: 2) | Heismuron (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175326266 commented 2025-12-20 09:13:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 175997160 (Comments: 1) | Biblioteca Navarrete (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, what does "wine_tourism" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place. commented 2025-12-20 09:10:45 UTC by mueschel ♦6,771 |
| 173616870 (Comments: 1) | fräbrawu (Discussed changesets: 25) | Gab es einen Grund warum du hier das building:part in der Kirche gelöcht hast, oder war das ein Versehen? z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044775809 commented 2025-12-20 08:43:16 UTC by Tatfahren ♦307 |
| 176131744 (Comments: 2) | TenantDen_Rentals (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176169850 commented 2025-12-20 08:40:49 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 175808457 (Comments: 2) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | Once again, same issue as in most of your other recent changesets--the outer way tagged as a generic building in this changeset was already part of a (much more comprehensively tagged) building multipolygon. Many editors (like JOSM) would imme... commented 2025-12-20 08:31:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 175558713 (Comments: 1) | umildner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ist das richtig so das man nur bis zur Treppe gehen darf und danach wieder umdreht? (diese hat access=private gesetzt). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456323486 Der Name klingt auch verdächtig, ist der tatsächlich, neben den unte... commented 2025-12-20 08:28:20 UTC by Tatfahren ♦307 |
| 176158608 (Comments: 1) | melo_1 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Salutare! Apreciez că te-ai apucat să realiniezi drumurile și să mai adaugi clădiri/anexe de clădiri în zona Hângu, NT - dar te rog nu mai șterge clădirile vechi, deja adăugate. Poți lua legătura cu mine și mă ocup eu să le ... commented 2025-12-20 08:28:15 UTC by Ionut Paduretu ♦13 |
| 175766718 (Comments: 2) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | Same issue here--the outer way tagged as a generic building in this changeset was already part of a (much more comprehensively tagged) building multipolygon. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCh... commented 2025-12-20 08:25:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 167841440 (Comments: 3) | Harry Preiß (Discussed changesets: 1) | Leider wurde das nicht angepasst. Bevor ich jetzt mit mapillary danach Suche frag ich aber erst mal: gibt es dort tatsächlich Verbotsschilder? In Teilen wurde das wegen routingproblemen wieder gelöscht, der Großteil ist aber no... commented 2025-12-20 08:23:47 UTC by Tatfahren ♦307 |
| 176131834 (Comments: 2) | TenantDen_Rentals (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. See https://www.osm.org/changeset/176169850 commented 2025-12-20 08:19:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 175766843 (Comments: 3) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | I certainly understand that this is a pretty complex situation for a new mapper to figure out. As such, it is a good idea to tread especially carefully around such unusually complicated mapping situations, and be wary of changing things until you ful... commented 2025-12-20 08:18:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 175766539 (Comments: 3) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | Given many of your other changesets share the same basic issue, I'd really advise consulting the OSM wiki to help you understand how building tagging works in OSM, particularly the simple buildings schema: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_B... commented 2025-12-20 08:04:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 176169214 (Comments: 1) | pauljmillsallstate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:01:20 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176168885 (Comments: 1) | Dr SMB Man (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:01:19 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176167873 (Comments: 1) | barrylbowkerallstate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:01:17 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
 | 176167691 (Comments: 1) | Serena Village Punta Cana (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:01:16 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176166470 (Comments: 1) | bradenwilsonallstate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:01:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176165680 (Comments: 1) | Serena Village Punta Cana (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:01:09 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176165386 (Comments: 1) | Serena Village Punta Cana (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:01:05 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176164105 (Comments: 1) | Keri Esmon: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:01:01 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
 | 176160205 (Comments: 1) | salud norte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:00:58 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176158980 (Comments: 1) | Arlandia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-20 08:00:51 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176049932 (Comments: 1) | alejandrofenollar (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi alejandrofenollar, this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "La Ñora" and "Los Polvorines": https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-1.18811&lat=37.99208&zoom=15&baselayer=... commented 2025-12-20 07:37:37 UTC by gscholz ♦2,831 |
| 176098217 (Comments: 1) | NTTrailsLSE (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, I've removed the tracks Way: 1459514803, Way: 1459569939, Way: 1459569941 and Way: 1459514802 as they duplicated existing highways. Such duplications could disrupt routing so could you please check for duplications before uploading. smaller ... commented 2025-12-20 07:32:56 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 174478608 (Comments: 8) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | Also, if I understand you correctly that you are mapping on behalf of or for a benefit of a client, or your mapping is otherwise connected to what you are paid to do, this is allowed but you will want to carefully consult OSM's Organized Editing... commented 2025-12-20 07:29:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 176142769 (Comments: 2) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | Just to clarify, the changset was reverted per the above; please see my comments on changeset #176142278 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176142278 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: ... commented 2025-12-20 07:16:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 167416548 (Comments: 1) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 128) | Hier wurde surface auf asphalt geändert, aber tracktype auf grade2 belassen. Das ist nun ein mismatch. Bitte um Korrektur. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269711907 commented 2025-12-20 07:16:19 UTC by Geo-Tobi ♦304 |
| 176142639 (Comments: 2) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | Just to clarify, the changset was reverted per the above; please see my comments on changeset #176142278 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176142278 Also, please be sure to take a second to provide a useful changeset summary per the OSM ... commented 2025-12-20 07:15:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 176155525 (Comments: 3) | Timinator2911 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi... Clear... thx for response. Greetz.. eggie commented 2025-12-20 07:13:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 155530230 (Comments: 7) | Erelen (Discussed changesets: 23) | Yes, everything looks correct now. The turn has been fixed properly and the update is already visible in Organic Maps. Thanks. commented 2025-12-20 07:13:11 UTC by FiveWho ♦7 |
| 176142278 (Comments: 5) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 11) | As others have previously reminded you a couple times now, OSM is a production database relied on in some form by perhaps billions of people across the world, so it is important to take at least basic care when making changes that could disrupt the m... commented 2025-12-20 07:07:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦65 |
| 172775062 (Comments: 1) | Razvan Ionita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Razvan Ionita, this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=25.53219&lat=45.05576&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%2... commented 2025-12-20 07:04:19 UTC by gscholz ♦2,831 |
| 174710731 (Comments: 1) | quikee (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch commented 2025-12-20 06:49:54 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦38 |
| 148640736 (Comments: 1) | KaraRaki (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10147356681/history has shop = concept_store that was added in this edit shop=concept_store ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https... commented 2025-12-20 06:25:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 171441416 (Comments: 1) | Guylby (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13118989771/history has shop = concept_store that was added in this edit shop=concept_store ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https... commented 2025-12-20 06:25:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 146039245 (Comments: 1) | cartido (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5431523102/history has shop = concept_store that was added in this edit shop=concept_store ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https:... commented 2025-12-20 06:25:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 60824606 (Comments: 1) | JacobMinam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5767540426/history has tourism = tower that was added in this edit what was meant by tourism=tower ? Would man_made=tower + tourism=attraction work ? commented 2025-12-20 06:12:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176155291 (Comments: 2) | Der Wilderer (Discussed changesets: 73) | Ich habe nur Kraftfahrzeuge auf Agricultural gelassen. Vorher war alle, Fußgänger, Kraftfahrzeuge, Fahrradfahrer und Reiter Reiter auf agricultural. Denn Fußgänger; Fahrradfahrer und Reiter dürfen ja da lang. Leider stehen ... commented 2025-12-20 05:42:47 UTC by Der Wilderer ♦61 |
| 176038515 (Comments: 2) | Ostrymiecz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-20 05:42:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176042467 (Comments: 2) | Fabcio (Discussed changesets: 47) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-12-20 05:42:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176042028 (Comments: 2) | Fabcio (Discussed changesets: 47) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-12-20 05:42:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 161364386 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 30) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2025-12-20 05:07:16 UTC by mrpulley ♦234 |
| 176144899 (Comments: 1) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 25) | Guten Morgen! Irgendetwas scheinst Du mit diesem Changeset an Relation 2775884 ( Bus 9: Elisabethkirche => Erlenring => Universitätsklinikum UKGM) verändert zu haben. An der Haltestelle Elisabethkirche liegen Platform und sto... commented 2025-12-20 04:59:42 UTC by Senihtu ♦110 |
| 176155550 (Comments: 1) | Gino-52 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Guten Morgen! In diesem changeset hast Du way 212051163 wieder mit service=driveway getaggt. Wir sollten das nicht immer hin und her ändern sondern uns einigen. s=d ist meiner Auffassung nach eine reine Grundtückszufahrt (so lese i... commented 2025-12-20 04:45:18 UTC by Senihtu ♦110 |
| 151392909 (Comments: 1) | G D Sneha (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283536434/history has shop = biryani_shop that was added in this edit shop=biryani_shop ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://w... commented 2025-12-20 04:16:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 172656144 (Comments: 1) | manojkiccha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132192379/history has al = Karikala Cholan Salai that was added in this edit What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be ... commented 2025-12-20 03:49:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
 | 176163428 (Comments: 1) | InsertUser (Discussed changesets: 34) | That shoud ahve said "Traced building from imagery". commented 2025-12-20 03:22:25 UTC by InsertUser ♦466 |
| 173642430 (Comments: 9) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 204) | relacja https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9353917/history była sobie na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34614333 i innych kawałkach Wisły - zanim tą relację route=waterway przerobiłeś na niepowiązaną trasę rowerową czy to by... commented 2025-12-20 02:59:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 159042368 (Comments: 3) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 92) | OK, I will ask then on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158975037 - I hoped that you may be familiar with the area, but if that does not apply then sorry for bothering you have a nice day! commented 2025-12-20 02:30:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 158975037 (Comments: 1) | tessabricot (Discussed changesets: 1) | You added shop=general_stores to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18271843/history What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it shop=general? Multiple shop=general? Is any of values from shop=* matching well? commented 2025-12-20 02:29:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 141464716 (Comments: 3) | Cardiff_Electric (Discussed changesets: 38) | To zdejmę to fixme=yes jako niejasne commented 2025-12-20 02:21:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176161437 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | Also, what's with that one-lane freeway located between the two carriageways of the 215? Is that a lane widening? HOV lanes? An "express" lane (as described on Wikipedia, for non-locals to drive with fewer exits)? A tollway? Something ... commented 2025-12-20 00:51:55 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦153 |
| 176155279 (Comments: 3) | larveyhong (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem. Thanks for helping to keep the map up to date - and for making me aware of a brewery I need to "research" next time I'm near Dorking. commented 2025-12-20 00:47:23 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 176160818 (Comments: 1) | OrchidA (Discussed changesets: 7) | Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Kartaview commented 2025-12-20 00:22:24 UTC by OrchidA ♦7 |
| 176153235 (Comments: 1) | Dr MichaelABaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't delete features which clearly exist. This track is clearly visible in Bing's aerial imagery and OS Open Maps Local (October 2025). It is also recorded in the OS Open Roads dataset. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-12-20 00:10:23 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 176121676 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_GeoMasker (Discussed changesets: 1) | San Jose is missing plenty of crossings, and the community has organized this MR challenge to map them: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/3199 It would be helpful if you could please mark your progress here! commented 2025-12-19 23:16:48 UTC by impiaaa ♦450 |
| X | 176094456 (Comments: 1) | shayanalinejad (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 You added a point with coordinates 0,0, which is obviously an error commented 2025-12-19 23:03:54 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 128732726 (Comments: 1) | Balaabirami (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ciao, lungo questa strada non esiste marciapiede, considerato che il limite della strada è 70 km/h non ci può essere nemmeno senza essere separato da un guardrail. Si tratta di un errore di import? Sto sistemando il routing della zona e... commented 2025-12-19 22:57:40 UTC by matteobott ♦6 |
| 153719179 (Comments: 11) | AnnaCatarina (Discussed changesets: 27) | Dziękuję bardzo, jutro przeniosę to na mapę. commented 2025-12-19 22:47:29 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦39 |
| 151564114 (Comments: 3) | okolobasik (Discussed changesets: 18) | Наприклад: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9702813 - це під'їзд №10 будинку 4к2. На street view видно навіть табличку з написом "Під'їзд 10". А ви додал... commented 2025-12-19 22:30:03 UTC by mike140 ♦361 |
| 174579169 (Comments: 2) | lukobe (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hmm, good question. I was thinking "discouraged" but that might not be quite right either... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#:~:text=Some%20mappers%20used%20this%20tag%20for%20safety%20reasons%20even%20when%20the%20access%20i... commented 2025-12-19 22:22:09 UTC by lukobe ♦6 |
| 161462065 (Comments: 1) | Bartosz Ogrodnik (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sam sobie uwagę zgłosiłeś :D https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5097236 commented 2025-12-19 22:13:47 UTC by kubahahaha ♦420 |
| 176158488 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | This is "Attempted to fix tags (P2)" commented 2025-12-19 22:10:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦153 |
| 163820212 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Please save and upload your changes in one area before moving on to another. commented 2025-12-19 22:03:09 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 162891977 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | The oneway=yes tag on those highway carriageways has been restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176158410. Please elaborate on why you tagged valid one-way roads as not one-way. commented 2025-12-19 21:59:30 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 170667311 (Comments: 7) | vmicho (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hello vmicho, I just happened to see your comments. Looking at the wiki, I would say map per is right: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attraction and especially the section "notes": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attr... commented 2025-12-19 21:55:43 UTC by Rainero ♦602 |
| 175037070 (Comments: 1) | wizivay45 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его commented 2025-12-19 21:42:22 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 176135487 (Comments: 1) | AustinMaps (Discussed changesets: 4) | Is Aston Hills actually a suburb, or just the name of that residential development? You haven't mentioned a source other than aerial imagery, something like this really needs one. --- Published using... commented 2025-12-19 21:12:27 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,445 |
| 176156432 (Comments: 1) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 104) | Do końca życia będziesz tak dziubdział, że co miedza i kretówka to nowy zestaw wysyłasz. Jeszcze się dzień nie skończył a już nawaliłeś 24 edycje po parę maks parę węzłów, linii i wysyłasz to co parę minut czy nawet m... commented 2025-12-19 21:09:48 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦583 |
| 176045976 (Comments: 1) | ann-andrejchenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте, подскажите, для Вас принципиальна последовательность названий (улица Магистральная, улица Набережная, улица Озёрная, ули... commented 2025-12-19 21:03:59 UTC by Grass-snake ♦251 |
| 169213960 (Comments: 6) | Cristian SF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Boa tarde, Cristian. Infelizmente, isso acontece e não dá para confiar em órgãos que não são os responsáveis oficiais pela publicação dos limites oficiais. Já vi outros casos de li... commented 2025-12-19 21:03:42 UTC by Fidelis Assis ♦36 |
| 175793700 (Comments: 2) | TrickyFoxy (Discussed changesets: 48) | Please provide a link to the official documents where this zone is defined. I can believe in its existence, but you clearly made a mistake in using tags. commented 2025-12-19 20:57:01 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 85913945 (Comments: 1) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 39) | There's a note concerning the name of a waterway added in this changeset. I've pasted the text of the note below, seems to me that the note author is correct that the name is incorrect but wanted to check first. "Here, the stre... commented 2025-12-19 20:52:45 UTC by dannmer ♦30 |
| 175682642 (Comments: 1) | Arlo James Barnes (Discussed changesets: 71) | Just to let you know, I'll fix it, but the edits to the parking garage at the Santa Fe County Administrative Complex, 240 Grant Ave, were incorrect. The entrance/exit to the lower and upper levels are separate, the lower level to the west... commented 2025-12-19 20:45:16 UTC by Aeuri ♦3 |
| 176147649 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, thanks for your edits! But are you sure about this one? Texaid is a brand for textile recycling so I would be surprised if they suddenly start recycling green waste. It would be the first time such waste is recycled in Sofia commented 2025-12-19 20:44:26 UTC by rhhs ♦173 |
| 175997193 (Comments: 1) | Michel SIS 04 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2025-12-19 20:36:57 UTC by StC ♦385 |
| 175994743 (Comments: 3) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 84) | Tad vienu atstājam alt_name. Ja nav domstarpību, var brīvi izvēlēties, kuru :) commented 2025-12-19 20:28:14 UTC by richlv ♦410 |
| 103567915 (Comments: 3) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 623) | Ogólnie, jeśli dobrze pamiętam- to był taki notoryczny wandal, że od pewnego momentu wszystkie jego zestawy były wycofywane, bez sprawdzania, co w nich jest. commented 2025-12-19 20:13:14 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,337 |
| 176154220 (Comments: 2) | mapko (Discussed changesets: 64) | Ahoj, doplnil som este access=private. Toto by malo postacovat. commented 2025-12-19 20:08:49 UTC by mapko ♦110 |
| 176152265 (Comments: 2) | Oksana_Oksana (Discussed changesets: 2) | In this case, it seems the reported issue is false positive. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map update! Best Regards, Pascal commented 2025-12-19 20:07:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176134103 (Comments: 2) | Oksana_Oksana (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/176152265 commented 2025-12-19 20:05:45 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,613 |
| 176112720 (Comments: 2) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 114) | Oh, joy. In other words, is_in=* is dead, long live is_in=* ? I'm sure that works very well in more sensible countries where the postal and administrative boundaries align. It would certainly make life easier for the Nominatim maintainers... commented 2025-12-19 20:01:04 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 173709773 (Comments: 3) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 623) | Proszę opisz sytuację bardziej szczegółowo. Droga jest połączeniem czego z lotniskiem? Brak odpowiedzi jest wystarczającym powodem, ponieważ wiele razy podałem już powody za tertiary tutaj i nie zanegowałeś żadnego z nich w ... commented 2025-12-19 19:59:40 UTC by pavvv ♦595 |
| 176152458 (Comments: 1) | Yorkville Eye Professionals (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 19:58:56 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176145623 (Comments: 1) | Flooring Elegance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 19:58:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176027985 (Comments: 1) | Ray hansen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Ray, looks like this and the other two cameras you added are likely test nodes and aren't physically present? Could you confirm and delete them? Thanks for keeping an eye out for ALPRs! commented 2025-12-19 19:55:30 UTC by HashFerret ♦11 |
| 176073612 (Comments: 3) | grantslatton (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh, I see what you're saying. Not sure exactly how this should be. But I thought the single white line was just a lane marker? I read the dotted line as "warning, exit only ahead" and the solid single white line as "exit only immi... commented 2025-12-19 19:45:35 UTC by pwbriggs ♦109 |
| 162246700 (Comments: 7) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 50) | Just a quick message for your thoughts on the above? commented 2025-12-19 19:44:53 UTC by FoldForever ♦1 |
| 176072164 (Comments: 3) | grantslatton (Discussed changesets: 2) | Not separating ways without a barrier has been a long standing rule in OSM. While I believe the issue is with Tesla, I do believe bring it up on Slack or the community forum, c.osm.org, is appropriate. commented 2025-12-19 19:30:39 UTC by Glassman ♦5,663 |
| 175860590 (Comments: 2) | LevanGo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks for the tip commented 2025-12-19 19:18:08 UTC by LevanGo ♦7 |
| 162511445 (Comments: 1) | Ryan E Howell (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tulsa Parks Authority is showing this as Tuckabache Trail, ending at Riverparks Westbank Trail as of today. commented 2025-12-19 19:14:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,293 |
| 175966488 (Comments: 1) | saraswathi89 (Discussed changesets: 1111) | Hello! Why did you add motor_vehicle=yes to Széchenyi lánchíd? This is not the case, as evidenced by the signs on both ends. General vehicle traffic is prohibited by vehicle=no in accordance with the sign prohibiting all v... commented 2025-12-19 19:06:23 UTC by leveskockaa ♦65 |
| 176151790 (Comments: 1) | moise4life (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Wat was je bedoeling? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-19 18:58:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176062603 (Comments: 1) | kautkas (Discussed changesets: 21) | As mentioned before, please do not change minor roads into driveways if they are within cadastral road lines and not through private property and access multiple properties, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271489614 . If you don't bel... commented 2025-12-19 18:56:22 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 176146264 (Comments: 1) | kautkas (Discussed changesets: 21) | As mentioned before, please don't set invalid access values in public cemeteries - there are not legal restrictions in Spriņģu kapi. commented 2025-12-19 18:50:10 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 176144967 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 319) | Oficjalnie to wciąż S1. Czy w terenie dali tabliczki z S52? commented 2025-12-19 18:50:05 UTC by Yunkers ♦410 |
| 176152381 (Comments: 2) | efecelikcan3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I deleted them intentionally. There were too many buildings on the map that didn't actually exist. commented 2025-12-19 18:48:28 UTC by efecelikcan3 ♦1 |
| 175971629 (Comments: 1) | Shekhar Prasad Bhatt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners a... commented 2025-12-19 18:44:50 UTC by martien-176 ♦364 |
| 175965764 (Comments: 1) | JPH3rdy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. The majority of your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. A few of them need tracing the shape more accurately. Zoom in so that... commented 2025-12-19 18:42:19 UTC by martien-176 ♦364 |
| 176141572 (Comments: 1) | Trần Sung (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hiện nay cấp huyện đã không còn, do đó cấp xã nên để là “district” chứ không phải “subdistrict” nữa. commented 2025-12-19 18:33:47 UTC by Tommybara ♦101 |
| 176119109 (Comments: 1) | GrannySmugg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey GrannySmugg, thanks for the edits to sidewalks and crossings! When adding sidewalks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459700663 please also make sure to update roadways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299599352 to have sidewalk:both=... commented 2025-12-19 18:33:18 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦347 |
| 176142084 (Comments: 1) | injuryattorneyfla1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | why did you remove the way that used to represent the building, the building tag should have been added back instead of being removed. commented 2025-12-19 18:25:04 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176142000 (Comments: 2) | injuryattorneyfla1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | why did you remove building=yes as this does seem to be a building, you also remove the height tag which if not correct should have been fixed instead of being removed, that tag is there as this building was initially added as part of the 2016 Miami ... commented 2025-12-19 18:24:16 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176152351 (Comments: 1) | justinsenemy (Discussed changesets: 6) | This area is constantly changing due to ongoing construction. If updating this area, an in-person survey is needed until new aerials are released. commented 2025-12-19 18:23:25 UTC by justinsenemy ♦3 |
| 175797809 (Comments: 1) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi! I was just discussing with your colleague about this area in changeset 175501870 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175501870). I surveyed this area in-person recently, and the road added has since been permanently removed. This area is und... commented 2025-12-19 18:21:11 UTC by justinsenemy ♦3 |
| 176145431 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 319) | Ograniczenie tonażowe zostało w kierunku Oświęcimia. W drugą stronę już go nie ma. commented 2025-12-19 18:20:59 UTC by Yunkers ♦410 |
| 146188423 (Comments: 1) | MacDony (Discussed changesets: 37) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3700721927 is a give_way, not a stop. commented 2025-12-19 18:19:44 UTC by Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦612 |
| 176074410 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM7 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Добрый день, спасибо за замечание. Видимо, не выпрямились углы commented 2025-12-19 18:15:47 UTC by Ozon OSM7 ♦4 |
| 175813421 (Comments: 3) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi anotherToad, just letting you know if you haven't seen, we're discussing road classification (including of Yonge Street) in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/southern-ontario-road-classification-ongoing-thread/139281 - please join in... commented 2025-12-19 18:10:52 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦347 |
| 175612259 (Comments: 2) | Amir Rubinstein (Discussed changesets: 3) | added commented 2025-12-19 18:01:17 UTC by Amir Rubinstein ♦3 |
| 176109952 (Comments: 1) | Mora3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I'd go with craft=pest_control. On the wiki, the See Also suggest using the craft key. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176109952 commented 2025-12-19 18:00:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,663 |
| 176142170 (Comments: 2) | injuryattorneyfla1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | also it the changeset comment on this change is not the best, "-" does not tell me anything about what you did in this changeset. for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-12-19 17:40:05 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 175415747 (Comments: 3) | rui228 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Obrigado! commented 2025-12-19 17:27:21 UTC by dmfr ♦65 |
| 176002591 (Comments: 2) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 115) | Mentioned in the Derby (evening) Telegraph on Tuesday 16 December 2025. https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/derby-news/derby-gets-new-derbion-square-10707183 The garden area is larger than I mapped it and I will update after Christmas if you have n... commented 2025-12-19 17:20:37 UTC by Dave Venables ♦170 |
| 175888096 (Comments: 2) | Wandern La Palma (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ich hab es wieder zurück geändert. commented 2025-12-19 17:16:01 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,995 |
| 176147382 (Comments: 1) | Landkreis Prignitz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hei, ...also irgendwas stimmt hier noch nicht: schaut mal: https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=16.0/53.1481/12.1874 Die Route 80-87 und 82-87 sind in Lage doppelt, es gibt Wegesgmente, die nicht dazu gehören... A... commented 2025-12-19 17:12:23 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,110 |
| 175999817 (Comments: 2) | fmc_5 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Danke für den Hinweis. :-) commented 2025-12-19 17:01:33 UTC by fmc_5 ♦5 |
| 176117370 (Comments: 2) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 121) | Thank you! I realized when is the problem. commented 2025-12-19 17:00:52 UTC by Fraxi ♦205 |
| 160360394 (Comments: 2) | Meagan B (Discussed changesets: 8) | hey there! thanks for noticing this :) the fixme is related to the address number - local officials haven't decided if it will be 11919 or 11921 commented 2025-12-19 16:54:01 UTC by Meagan B ♦9 |
| 176068040 (Comments: 2) | thom_bike_bln (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Alex, vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Ich hatte eigentlch gute Absichten das so zu taggen, hatte die Wikiseite dann aber nicht gefunden und es vergessen ... ;-) Ist jetzt gebookmarkt und ich habe die Abstellfläche wie vorgeschlagen getag... commented 2025-12-19 16:49:35 UTC by thom_bike_bln ♦14 |
| 175464329 (Comments: 1) | Alic L (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Buildings should have their corners squared. Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-19 16:48:07 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176044070 (Comments: 1) | CoffeecatDE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Die hier von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen waren nur zum Testen? Falls ja, kannst du es bitte wieder in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurückversetzen? Danke und Grüße commented 2025-12-19 16:47:28 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176043531 (Comments: 1) | CoffeecatDE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Die hier von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen waren nur zum Testen? Falls ja, kannst du es bitte wieder in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurückversetzen? Danke und Grüße commented 2025-12-19 16:47:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176043389 (Comments: 1) | CoffeecatDE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Die hier von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen waren nur zum Testen? Falls ja, kannst du es bitte wieder in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurückversetzen? Danke und Grüße commented 2025-12-19 16:47:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176043287 (Comments: 1) | CoffeecatDE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Die hier von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen waren nur zum Testen? Falls ja, kannst du es bitte wieder in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurückversetzen? Danke und Grüße commented 2025-12-19 16:47:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 175784141 (Comments: 4) | HappyK3C3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you very much for your feedback and suggestion. Ah I see, I will check in JOSM then. commented 2025-12-19 16:36:58 UTC by HappyK3C3 ♦1 |
| 176146705 (Comments: 1) | Niccat (Discussed changesets: 1) | I see you are a new mapper, welcome to OSM! Please familiarize yourself with OSM's guidelines, particularly: Do not use data from another mapping service. See this wiki page for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_othe... commented 2025-12-19 16:35:41 UTC by kohiwonomu ♦2 |
| 175298585 (Comments: 1) | Galarkun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to othe... commented 2025-12-19 16:33:25 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176018624 (Comments: 1) | Robin Simonklein (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, est-ce que tu pourrais rajouter des commentaires sur tes changeset merci wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques commented 2025-12-19 16:33:02 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 134048929 (Comments: 2) | fx99 (Discussed changesets: 82) | If you look at their homepage you should notice that fabric is not the right key. commented 2025-12-19 16:31:50 UTC by fx99 ♦131 |
| 172845711 (Comments: 3) | Bernard 88 95 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour. Merci pour les infos sur les travaux. La 1ere phrase signifie que le commentaire de changeset "04102025 1" n'est pas très informatif : c'est utile d'expliquer brièvement la raison des modificatio... commented 2025-12-19 16:27:01 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,175 |
| 176144284 (Comments: 1) | Jarek 🚲 (Discussed changesets: 113) | Oops, sorry, I see now that "Sette Productions" came from a much older changeset. However it remains the case that it was in the wrong place for its address (even numbers are north side of the street), and 148 Yorkville has actually ... commented 2025-12-19 16:17:31 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦347 |
| 145479500 (Comments: 4) | Bernard 88 95 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Super, merci ! J'ai résolu les notes et déplacé l'accès aux quais par l'extérieur du batiment. commented 2025-12-19 16:16:27 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,175 |
| 175688842 (Comments: 6) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 18) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shelter - "shelter=yes: A shelter exists, which may or may not be mapped separately" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter - "shelter=yes: Ein Unterstand ist vorhanden. ... commented 2025-12-19 16:14:54 UTC by Zrop ♦121 |
| 175763559 (Comments: 6) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 18) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shelter - "shelter=yes: A shelter exists, which may or may not be mapped separately" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter - "shelter=yes: Ein Unterstand ist vorhanden. ... commented 2025-12-19 16:14:40 UTC by Zrop ♦121 |
| 176104727 (Comments: 5) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 18) | hab ich, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shelter - "shelter=yes: A shelter exists, which may or may not be mapped separately" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter - "shelter=yes: Ein Unterstand ist... commented 2025-12-19 16:14:09 UTC by Zrop ♦121 |
| 176068944 (Comments: 2) | AntSom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Seyruun, You're welcome. Have a great rest of your day. commented 2025-12-19 16:10:26 UTC by AntSom ♦10 |
| 175651817 (Comments: 1) | Riyadi Wibowo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings . Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-19 16:08:36 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176146869 (Comments: 1) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 125) | Błąd opisu - powinno być "nawierzchnia" commented 2025-12-19 16:02:44 UTC by Adam Haba ♦31 |
| 176019157 (Comments: 1) | Firefishy (Discussed changesets: 42) | gah! you beat me to it fixing this note about HSBC! https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2675194 :-) commented 2025-12-19 15:58:40 UTC by Harry Wood ♦104 |
| 117512216 (Comments: 1) | escribis (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bonjour, une note a été ouverte sur une caméra que tu as cartographiée sur ce changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4816883 Peut-tu donner ça position exacte pour confirmer qu'elle existe enco... commented 2025-12-19 15:54:37 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 175964365 (Comments: 1) | LorenzoDvz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Pour taguer les bout de pelouse, il faut utiliser landuse=grass et non leisure=park sinon ça indique que c'est l'équivalent d'un parc communal. commented 2025-12-19 15:39:37 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 175647022 (Comments: 1) | Riyadi Wibowo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. <... commented 2025-12-19 15:39:36 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176131246 (Comments: 1) | Calasanz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola, la elevación (813) no coincide con el IGN (799) en esas coordenadas, es necesaria la necesidad de elevación en este elemento? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1241971862/history Saludos commented 2025-12-19 15:35:49 UTC by aTarom ♦856 |
| 175781364 (Comments: 1) | Bootprint (Discussed changesets: 23) | hey, thanks. is there a pedestrian crossing too? commented 2025-12-19 15:30:33 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦347 |
| 176143223 (Comments: 2) | Campasun (Discussed changesets: 1) | In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. I have checked the mentioned elements and can confi... commented 2025-12-19 15:23:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 175251110 (Comments: 1) | yanivzelig (Discussed changesets: 12) | מישהו מחק את התוואי של שביל גולני באזור חריש עד מגידו. אתה עשית? ואם כן, למה? commented 2025-12-19 15:16:27 UTC by Yitzchak M ♦55 |
| 176101229 (Comments: 1) | keymakr_operator_2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, in this changeset a turning circle was already present. If you're adding the highway around the barrier for the turning circle, then you can adjust the existing highway geometry so it's not replicated with another object. Additionally, ... commented 2025-12-19 15:15:40 UTC by Mapiate ♦35 |
| 175777139 (Comments: 1) | NateDaGreat (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hey Nate, when adding sidewalks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457613663 please also make sure to update roadways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35797445 to have sidewalk:both=separate (or sidewalk:left/sidewalk:right if sidewalk is ... commented 2025-12-19 15:13:35 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦347 |
| 176143762 (Comments: 1) | لوازم ماهیگیری ترکی (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-19 15:08:56 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176142070 (Comments: 1) | 613 Electric Inc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-19 15:08:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176141911 (Comments: 1) | majoor404 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Er stond al een speelplaats ingetekend als node. Die was nu overbodig en heb ik verwijderd. MVG, Eggie N... commented 2025-12-19 15:05:21 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175678060 (Comments: 1) | nicola_yubo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Nicola, ho già mappato questo defibrillatore (stazione Vetra M4) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13338529120 Del mio, rispetto al tuo, cambia il tipo access=*, magari lo cambiamo Come sistemiamo? commented 2025-12-19 15:00:23 UTC by matteobott ♦6 |
| 176106830 (Comments: 2) | R4v3nB14ck (Discussed changesets: 5) | La zona de agua de la pergola es una "fuente", bastante amplia que parece estanque. en la zona de tortugas son estanques de agua, no fuentes, literalmente hay tortugas. supongo que te refieres al que dice "tortugas" ... commented 2025-12-19 14:53:50 UTC by R4v3nB14ck ♦2 |
| 176143916 (Comments: 1) | T med ett g (Discussed changesets: 1) | New to editing. Should the adress be added separately on Bergskroken 3? commented 2025-12-19 14:50:38 UTC by T med ett g ♦1 |
| 176102770 (Comments: 2) | R4v3nB14ck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ahí hice un arreglo parcial. Las salas son room=classroom. Pueden ser expresadas como un área o como un nodo. Las dejé como nodos porque es más fácil por ahora. Además su número no es un nomb... commented 2025-12-19 14:38:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 176111875 (Comments: 4) | R4v3nB14ck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Entiendo perfectamente, gracias. Saludos. commented 2025-12-19 14:35:25 UTC by R4v3nB14ck ♦2 |
| 176089029 (Comments: 1) | keymakr_operator_1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, are you sure this service road is named Pinnacle Peak Way? In KyFromAbove Aerial Imagery (2022-2024) and Bing Maps Aerial imagery layers it appears to be a parking lot. Slightly north of this location is a new housing development under constructi... commented 2025-12-19 14:24:56 UTC by Mapiate ♦35 |
| 173616654 (Comments: 1) | 残阳逐流 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 网友您好，感谢您一直以来对osm的贡献。不过，我冒昧地建议一下：最好不要在iD编辑器使用天地图的自定义图层。 这是因为iD编辑器在上传时会自动在变更集记录使用过的图层，包括您... commented 2025-12-19 14:16:09 UTC by 真中あお ♦38 |
| 176141802 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 575) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176137863 została wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176141802 commented 2025-12-19 14:00:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176137863 (Comments: 4) | forestus (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176137863 została wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176141802 commented 2025-12-19 14:00:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
 | 176137366 (Comments: 1) | sab27 (Discussed changesets: 9) | I included the wrong changeset comment in this changeset. This is not in Chad, but in Venezuela. It should just read #mapyourgrid added powertowers, extended line commented 2025-12-19 13:58:00 UTC by sab27 ♦19 |
| 176141722 (Comments: 1) | mrf8004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks and happy mapping! commented 2025-12-19 13:55:53 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦46 |
 | 176108310 (Comments: 1) | sab27 (Discussed changesets: 9) | I included the wrong details in this changeset. This is not in Chad, but in Burkina Faso - it should just read #mapyourgrid commented 2025-12-19 13:55:40 UTC by sab27 ♦19 |
| 176130322 (Comments: 2) | Krushnagaikwad (Discussed changesets: 1) | This comment was generated by my bot. The description appears to be factual and non-promotional, so this is a false positive. Apologies for the inconvenience. commented 2025-12-19 13:53:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176135809 (Comments: 1) | Siem_Hw (Discussed changesets: 16) | The vast majority of buildings here represent buildings visible in the imagery, there was a small missalignment to Bing of some buildings which I corrected. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to ge... commented 2025-12-19 13:43:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 165261798 (Comments: 1) | MTB_Gordon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for mapping these! commented 2025-12-19 13:37:26 UTC by CNeal ♦3 |
| 176046073 (Comments: 1) | FMC-Henri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Eigentlich ist "footway=sidewalk" auf solchen Abschnitten korrekt, also auch wenn sie nicht "parallel" sind: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-sidewalk-stubs/119025 Falls es bei der Datenprozessierung stö... commented 2025-12-19 13:34:48 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦436 |
| 176128696 (Comments: 2) | _Sela_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, hai ragione, ho controllato su map.geo.admin e viene indicato "Via". Strano perché il numero civico 21 e 21a sono "Piazza San Francesco". Ripristino l'indirizzo. Grazie della segnalazione commented 2025-12-19 13:32:55 UTC by _Sela_ ♦1 |
| 176139843 (Comments: 5) | tyil (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hier zie je wat je edits waren https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176139843 commented 2025-12-19 13:25:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 169595378 (Comments: 1) | nbuettler (Discussed changesets: 13) | In OSM werden kurzzeitige Sperrungen nicht kartiert. Und wenn du schon etwas sperrst, dann bist du auch in der Pflicht, die Sperrung wieder zu entfernen, wenn sie nicht mehr besteht. Gruß Protoxenus commented 2025-12-19 13:24:05 UTC by Protoxenus ♦326 |
| 158582351 (Comments: 1) | sidro* (Discussed changesets: 1) | Beschäftige dich doch mal mit den Prinzipien von OSM, u.a.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_nicht_das_Name-Tag,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben Gruß Protoxenus commented 2025-12-19 13:18:48 UTC by Protoxenus ♦326 |
| 175720542 (Comments: 4) | Office de tourisme de Mussidan-Villamblard (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok avec le bon lien https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176085955 ! commented 2025-12-19 13:16:52 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,288 |
| 176137238 (Comments: 3) | tyil (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks! Ik zal bij volgende cameras hier op te letten. commented 2025-12-19 13:04:41 UTC by tyil ♦2 |
| 176138363 (Comments: 1) | Keri Esmon: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 13:04:06 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176112203 (Comments: 1) | R4v3nB14ck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola. Mapeamos estructuras individuales. Aquí la mayoría son aglomeraciones de edificios. más parece una edición para rellenar espacios vacíos que para reflejar la realidad. Vamos a intentar arreglarlo. Por favor te... commented 2025-12-19 12:56:53 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 176139146 (Comments: 2) | ChristoffelB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Op de ventweg is wel een maxspeed van 30 getagd. commented 2025-12-19 12:50:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 138422824 (Comments: 4) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 86) | @Bear-in-a-box: I just asked you to tag horse walkers with animal=horse_walker and not wirh leisure=horse_riding (horse riding centre) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037064 commented 2025-12-19 12:46:20 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦860 |
| 172801757 (Comments: 2) | draconic_mapper (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Mateusz. Thanks for spotting this mistake. I fixed it. commented 2025-12-19 12:45:58 UTC by draconic_mapper ♦8 |
| 176138783 (Comments: 1) | ChristoffelB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Werkelijk een maxspeed van 30 op een fietspad? foot en bicycle=designated hoeft niet op een fietspad. MVG, ... commented 2025-12-19 12:43:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176139289 (Comments: 1) | Jens V (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ik heb per ongeluk de twee bomenrijen hier verwijderd. Dit is een foutieve digitalisatie van mij. Kan dit worden hersteld naar de vorige toestand aub? commented 2025-12-19 12:42:39 UTC by Jens V ♦9 |
| 176048797 (Comments: 3) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 69) | Jedynie też w przyszłości będzie trzeba poprawić pewnie ten łącznik do ronda, bo ja go robiłem trochę na oko i ze zdjęć. takich z ziemi. Niestety w systemach informacji przestrzennych tez jeszcze nie naniesiona jest ta droga. commented 2025-12-19 12:41:09 UTC by Norbert Wołowiec ♦5 |
| 176131674 (Comments: 1) | Văn Phú Đà Lạt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 12:27:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176026327 (Comments: 3) | Rupert Swarbrick (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks, I'll leave myself a private note to survey this in person at some point to determine this for sure. commented 2025-12-19 12:26:25 UTC by ExoMal ♦41 |
| 176114549 (Comments: 1) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hej, widzę, że dalej trwa tu budowa, więc dodawanie foot=designated i bicycle=designated jest błędem. Z całą pewnością nie ma tu znaków, z których wynikałoby takie mapowanie. Tagi te będzie można dodać dopiero gdy zakończy... commented 2025-12-19 12:24:49 UTC by YomanNH ♦428 |
| 176081253 (Comments: 3) | Hilbert S (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ahhh... duidelijk! Gr eggie commented 2025-12-19 12:22:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176131265 (Comments: 1) | MAP CONTIBUTER (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 12:19:58 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176118684 (Comments: 1) | Mora3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 12:14:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176114858 (Comments: 1) | 500376190 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 12:13:08 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176138155 (Comments: 1) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 44) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog/57996/546 commented 2025-12-19 12:07:07 UTC by marazzer ♦58 |
| 176135740 (Comments: 2) | Ha_Iwan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Info verplaatst naar adresnode commented 2025-12-19 12:04:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176107036 (Comments: 2) | Fra00 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Ti segnalo anche questa, passante per lo stesso punto: https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=16751540 commented 2025-12-19 12:01:14 UTC by dp7 ♦61 |
| 176136572 (Comments: 1) | Sahar Shadi (Discussed changesets: 6) | 13288521747 also looks like a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2048246044, which had already been entered with a more precise position and more properties. commented 2025-12-19 12:00:48 UTC by Steine42 ♦9 |
| 176136039 (Comments: 1) | SoVGGC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hiya. Thanks for trying to improve the map. I’ve had to revert this changeset (and your following one which deleted the bridleway) as the bridleway does exist as a right of way, and hence should be on the map. The reversion is here: http... commented 2025-12-19 11:43:06 UTC by gurglypipe ♦961 |
| 175197115 (Comments: 2) | pertile (Discussed changesets: 24) | Thanks, I changed it with ref:AR:H:FU commented 2025-12-19 11:29:04 UTC by pertile ♦70 |
| 176022810 (Comments: 2) | Franck31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci pour ce retour, en éffet je viens de regarder et découvrir IGN MNT LIDAR HD ! c'est assez énorme comme visuel, je vais m'ajuster avec ça. commented 2025-12-19 11:28:35 UTC by Franck31 ♦1 |
| 175213532 (Comments: 2) | pertile (Discussed changesets: 24) | Fixed! Thanks. commented 2025-12-19 11:28:26 UTC by pertile ♦70 |
| 175978211 (Comments: 3) | mgafMUAT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Sí, efectivamente, no todo mapeo tiene una representación en el render. Pero las vías que van pegadas a la calle se deben mapear como parte de la calle. Se pueden eventualmente mapear por separado, pero al ser este u... commented 2025-12-19 11:19:51 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
 | 173330321 (Comments: 1) | fasttrack2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is "supermarket" really a part of the name? It seems like "shop=supermaket" is already describes this. commented 2025-12-19 11:15:16 UTC by Layft Greater ♦180 |
| 176133215 (Comments: 2) | Wijkstrad (Discussed changesets: 3) | fixed warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway \t2 commented 2025-12-19 10:59:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176090045 (Comments: 1) | Wijkstrad (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Wijkstraat. Graag concreet commentaar bij je edits. Wat meer toegevoegd zegt niets. Beter de woningen loshouden van de landuse. Al die tuinen toevoegen is niet gebruikelijk, maar fout is het ook niet. warnings:close_nodes:vertices \... commented 2025-12-19 10:54:02 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175912303 (Comments: 1) | free_ice_tea (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao free_ice_tea Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Gruss aus Bern, habi commented 2025-12-19 10:53:04 UTC by habi ♦1,984 |
| 170690854 (Comments: 1) | Sahar Shadi (Discussed changesets: 6) | 13077494619 appears to be a duplicate of node 13063305745, which user kpedido has already entered. Presumably, the position of 13077494619 is more accurate. commented 2025-12-19 10:52:55 UTC by Steine42 ♦9 |
| 176103085 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 288) | Racja, oneway=yes zostało z poprzedniej tymczasowej organizacji ruchu. Zmieniłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176134541 commented 2025-12-19 10:46:47 UTC by syntex ♦891 |
| 171682874 (Comments: 1) | Sahar Shadi (Discussed changesets: 6) | 13130807910 appears to be a duplicate of node 4375669877, which already existed in OSM with a more precise location and additional properties. commented 2025-12-19 10:39:40 UTC by Steine42 ♦9 |
| 173376206 (Comments: 2) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 963) | Je irai voir pour corriger l'erreur. Merci commented 2025-12-19 10:36:59 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦243 |
| 176046116 (Comments: 1) | AbsentBeyond (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks a lot for your contributions. Please keep in mind to keep your changes local, and to upload your changes before you move on to another region/country/continent. This makes it easier to keep track of and review edits. See https://wiki.opens... commented 2025-12-19 10:35:40 UTC by BBJIB ♦16 |
| 171416326 (Comments: 1) | Sahar Shadi (Discussed changesets: 6) | 13116653749 looks like a duplicate of 13114553188, which you entered yourself the day before. The more precise location is probably 49.4668106 8.5540447. commented 2025-12-19 10:30:51 UTC by Steine42 ♦9 |
| 176133166 (Comments: 1) | Trey Cantey: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 10:27:24 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176130990 (Comments: 1) | vikingmat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 10:27:21 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176128890 (Comments: 1) | Eilan Digital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 10:27:19 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176114113 (Comments: 1) | Teusavet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 10:27:05 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 175952891 (Comments: 2) | Minibig (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Je vous remercie pour votre commentaire ! J'ai mis à jour la page Instagram du restaurant. Merci encore pour votre contribution commented 2025-12-19 10:23:11 UTC by Minibig ♦1 |
| 176127475 (Comments: 3) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | It's not the community's job to fix companies' mistakes. commented 2025-12-19 10:21:22 UTC by the_third_man ♦14 |
| 176131705 (Comments: 1) | Janne van Zaale (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted by changeset #176132968 Dart staat al op de kaart MVG eggie commented 2025-12-19 10:09:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176130908 (Comments: 13) | Janne van Zaale (Discussed changesets: 3) | Prinsentheater staat nog als niet ge opend. commented 2025-12-19 10:07:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175964221 (Comments: 4) | Justientje (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep... Het lijkt zo simpel, maar niet als je af en toe iets wil aanpassen. Het kost tijd om het onder de knie te krijgen. Je kunt ook een opmerking op de kaart plaatsen. Dan pikt een ervaren mapper het wel op. Zelf proberen is natuurlijk o... commented 2025-12-19 10:04:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 5153099 (Comments: 1) | bgruen (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/804147892/history what you wanted to express by that FIXME=yes ? commented 2025-12-19 09:53:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 67165058 (Comments: 3) | Something B (Discussed changesets: 42) | I will remove it then, as others will likely not know either commented 2025-12-19 09:52:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176075049 (Comments: 1) | statelyelms (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459443374 There is already a train station tag. commented 2025-12-19 09:46:38 UTC by DaveF ♦1,594 |
| 175761819 (Comments: 1) | rfh shbrn (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-12-19 09:35:25 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 175646480 (Comments: 1) | Riyadi Wibowo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task. Please don't connect nodes of buildings to each other. Best regards, commented 2025-12-19 09:29:16 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 175434565 (Comments: 1) | c8c8c8c8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please tag buildings as building=yes. Try to follow the rooflines more accurately. You often ignore extensions and draw just a rectangle. Best regards. commented 2025-12-19 09:21:45 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 175913270 (Comments: 1) | free_ice_tea (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao free_ice_tea Solange das Gebäude noch auf den swisstopo Luftbildern (und im Katasterplan Bern) zu sehen ist, ist es oftmals besser, statt das Gebäude einfach zu löschen, dem einen sog. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Leb... commented 2025-12-19 09:20:47 UTC by habi ♦1,984 |
| 170266633 (Comments: 3) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 31) | thanks! commented 2025-12-19 09:19:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 175995906 (Comments: 3) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, My name is Santosh & I am the mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for noticing the issue and correcting it. Regarding my edits: I removed the segment because there was no physical separat... commented 2025-12-19 09:14:08 UTC by sbedwal_Lyft ♦12 |
| 156225180 (Comments: 3) | akita_rari (Discussed changesets: 1) | みなさん、こんにちは。 この変更セットのコンビニについてですが、変更セット: 137676073 で一度削除されています。 ・実在しないファミリーマート (履歴) https://www.openstreetmap.org/n... commented 2025-12-19 09:06:51 UTC by Mappin' Jack Flash ♦247 |
 | 176105112 (Comments: 2) | Guy Maurel KONAN (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, I’m correcting this; it’s an error. Thank you. commented 2025-12-19 08:51:00 UTC by Guy Maurel KONAN ♦1 |
| 175631712 (Comments: 1) | Yourez (Discussed changesets: 2) | есть amenity=game_feeding исправил commented 2025-12-19 08:43:00 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| 176110160 (Comments: 19) | Siebren W (Discussed changesets: 2) | Klopt, de landeigenaren krijgen een vergoeding. Maar kunnen op bepaalde momenten ook beslissen niet meer mee te werken. commented 2025-12-19 08:41:50 UTC by Siebren W ♦2 |
| 175953782 (Comments: 1) | DAVIDOUMA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please use building=yes instead of Building=Yes! commented 2025-12-19 08:40:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176092152 (Comments: 2) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi! Stimmt, der Einstieg zum Tauchspot ist am Denkmal. Danke! commented 2025-12-19 08:30:26 UTC by ayxis ♦63 |
| 176125047 (Comments: 2) | DaanLT (Discussed changesets: 59) | sure - greetings from Lithuania (Europe) :) commented 2025-12-19 08:28:26 UTC by DaanLT ♦113 |
| 176097208 (Comments: 2) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi! Jep, viele Punkte sind sehr alt. Ich wusste nicht, dass es sich um einen Blindimport handelt. Es hat mich gestört, dass überall sport=scuba_diving herumliegen, die Lagebedingt meistens Tauchspots sein müssen (im Gewässe... commented 2025-12-19 08:28:18 UTC by ayxis ♦63 |
| 176110473 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 33) | habe highway=driveway zu highway=service korrigiert --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176110473 commented 2025-12-19 08:21:30 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,465 |
| 176087050 (Comments: 2) | marktechratp (Discussed changesets: 10) | Au plaisir ! merci pour le retour commented 2025-12-19 08:17:38 UTC by marktechratp ♦5 |
| 176087981 (Comments: 2) | marktechratp (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ok , merci pour l'info au plaisir commented 2025-12-19 08:16:48 UTC by marktechratp ♦5 |
 | 129219694 (Comments: 1) | Kezang Dendup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975449797/history has shop = general_stores that was added in this edit shop=general_stores ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it shop=general? Multiple shop=general? Is any of values from https://wiki... commented 2025-12-19 08:04:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 162616825 (Comments: 1) | Divyanshu kunwar (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1360659705/history has shop = general_stores that was added in this edit shop=general_stores ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it shop=general? Multiple shop=general? Is any of values from https://wik... commented 2025-12-19 08:04:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 92236398 (Comments: 1) | joost schouppe import (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please make sure to add animal:horse_walker next time commented 2025-12-19 07:58:50 UTC by Bear-in-a-box ♦56 |
| 173880795 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Please don't tag motorway links that are actually one-way as not one way. Those motorway links or freeway ramps are clearly one-way. commented 2025-12-19 07:49:39 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 97098843 (Comments: 1) | RobbyVN (Discussed changesets: 6) | please make sure to add tag "animal:horse_walker" commented 2025-12-19 07:48:04 UTC by Bear-in-a-box ♦56 |
| 173883647 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Why did you tag actual one-way motorway links as not one-way? Those are clearly one-way. Those errors you made have been corrected by another mapper. commented 2025-12-19 07:45:09 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 173928690 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | The alignment of the road you mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445983866) is off from the actual alignment of the road seen in aerial imagery. The road curves going to the house, not going in a straight line. Please map and align roads goin... commented 2025-12-19 07:42:22 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176017133 (Comments: 3) | sinusnombre (Discussed changesets: 1) | ah verstehe commented 2025-12-19 07:41:45 UTC by rohieb ♦135 |
| 176037064 (Comments: 4) | Bear-in-a-box (Discussed changesets: 57) | Guys, I don't want to be rude. These tags etc..., this is very complex for me. I will not remember it. So maybe you could change it yourself? instead of writing long comments, why not just change the tags? this is not to be meant in a rud... commented 2025-12-19 07:38:32 UTC by Bear-in-a-box ♦56 |
| 174150337 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | What do you mean that you "gated" this driveway? You just changed this service road to a driveway. commented 2025-12-19 07:36:04 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 174510040 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Why did you change the direction of those one-way roads as going the opposite direction of the actual one-way restriction of those roads on the ground? You don't want to make routing software direct drivers to go on the wrong side of a divided r... commented 2025-12-19 07:16:11 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176126064 (Comments: 2) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 175) | https://www.kanalfrederikshavn.dk/vis/nyhed/politisk-enighed-boernehuset-trindelvej-i-skagen-lukkes commented 2025-12-19 07:15:56 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,740 |
| 176037993 (Comments: 1) | ikkanhetbestekenen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please take a little time to learn how to properly use/add to the OSM database. Many guides are available. Way: 1459227951 and Way: 1459227952 have been deleted as they duplicate existing highways causing disruptio... commented 2025-12-19 07:11:03 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 175784654 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | @idkwhatname2use This isn't about California State Routes 7 and 9. This edit concerns a new 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲, which could be designated either I-7 or I-9 (but (probably) not both). My motivation for adding Future I-7/9 to... commented 2025-12-19 07:09:54 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦153 |
| 176126021 (Comments: 1) | Matt Moles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 07:09:07 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176110275 (Comments: 1) | Shelter Cove Marina & Campground (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-19 07:08:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176112828 (Comments: 2) | Bovi887 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Leo Slager, Dat klopt inderdaad niet, scherp! Dank voor het aanpassen. commented 2025-12-19 07:05:55 UTC by Bovi887 ♦3 |
| 176098495 (Comments: 2) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 43) | Bad wikidata and wikipedia on Прорыв блокады Ленинграда, fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176126368 commented 2025-12-19 07:05:49 UTC by dypa ♦156 |
| 176105332 (Comments: 1) | KristenR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-19 06:57:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176105247 (Comments: 1) | nigna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-19 06:57:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176115187 (Comments: 1) | Murre90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think you accidentally deleted the node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/385732559/history/) for Sveden commented 2025-12-19 06:43:44 UTC by Jaska Korhonen ♦2 |
| 173929308 (Comments: 5) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | In this changeset, you glued several roads to a suburb boundary. Please don't glue roads to administrative or suburb boundaries. commented 2025-12-19 06:39:54 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176124998 (Comments: 1) | khag7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Changeset comment and source are incorrect. My mistake. Comment should read "adding detail to Charles Evans cemetery; Gates, fences, paths, buildings" and source is satellite imagery and personal knowledge commented 2025-12-19 06:36:32 UTC by khag7 ♦4 |
| 176103451 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 137) | Musiałeś skasować betonowy przejazd kolejowy, jedyny odcinak na którym pozostały szyny, który pieczołowicie wczoraj wrysowałem? Sporo się przy tym napracowałem :-( commented 2025-12-19 06:20:16 UTC by VA00 ♦619 |
| 176039615 (Comments: 3) | ilias_ (Discussed changesets: 24) | Then why you're commenting me my every changesets..? commented 2025-12-19 06:16:21 UTC by Open@2025 ♦3 |
| 175946693 (Comments: 2) | grizart23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19190 commented 2025-12-19 06:15:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 176085828 (Comments: 1) | СергейК159 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день, при простроении маршрута с адреса Свизистов 3 до Левченко 6Б навигатор ведет длинным маршрутом, хотя проезд через новый путе... commented 2025-12-19 06:13:43 UTC by СергейК159 ♦1 |
| 176112280 (Comments: 1) | LYNX4546 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for adding extra details to Our Lady's Primary. You accidentally set the whole area as a building, I've reverted that now. Also, we prefer to map phone numbers in international format, but they get automatically fix... commented 2025-12-19 06:10:30 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦355 |
| 176124256 (Comments: 1) | Jimmy05 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kindly take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset and please try to group similar changes together in a single changeset. Thank you for cooperating, Happy Mapping! commented 2025-12-19 06:08:34 UTC by OSM Contributer ♦11 |
| 123290645 (Comments: 1) | fylip22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, Pourquoi ce "not:operator:wikidata" sur la post_box ? Ce n'est pas La Poste qui gère cette post_box ? commented 2025-12-19 05:52:21 UTC by LudovicG ♦113 |
| 135224615 (Comments: 1) | le sanglier (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Pourquoi ce "not:operator:wikidata" ? Ce n'est pas La Poste qui gère cette post_box ? commented 2025-12-19 05:50:50 UTC by LudovicG ♦113 |
| 176063808 (Comments: 2) | lowkeycarts212 (Discussed changesets: 3) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19189 commented 2025-12-19 05:43:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 118727943 (Comments: 1) | Jacques Foucry (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Pourquoi ce "not:operator:wikidata=Q373724" ? Il ne s'agit pas d'une post_box gérée par la Poste (même sur terrain du Super U) ? commented 2025-12-19 05:43:15 UTC by LudovicG ♦113 |
| 176119005 (Comments: 2) | crms1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19188 commented 2025-12-19 05:37:50 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 169198151 (Comments: 1) | Wulz (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi Wulz, I have walked various sections of the trail and there are no signs on the ground that can be traced back to the codes and names of this "relation". “Relations” must meet certain requirements in order to be mapped;... commented 2025-12-19 04:59:01 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
| 176076917 (Comments: 4) | Pachangas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply. Oh yes I was definitely attempting to remove this trail from the map, for the reasons I cited (I didn't realize that was considered "vandalism" in OSM nomenclature). It's clearly a user-built trail, an... commented 2025-12-19 04:32:07 UTC by Pachangas ♦1 |
| 174705155 (Comments: 5) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 15) | Geotiff government this area on mu profile btw commented 2025-12-19 03:57:13 UTC by w_djatmiko ♦8 |
| 176120893 (Comments: 1) | FeetAndInches (Discussed changesets: 8) | See the discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4962437 commented 2025-12-19 03:55:55 UTC by FeetAndInches ♦11 |
| 176080494 (Comments: 2) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Quite certain it's not for the Chinese (as the name of an tourist spot). The English name could be reviewed. My view is that it is an established common name for the tourist attraction (see the press cutting at the separate OSM notes) commented 2025-12-19 03:54:59 UTC by Cypp0847 ♦7 |
| 175454301 (Comments: 1) | gomedia91 (Discussed changesets: 40) | I've partially reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176120320 - why did you delete 100 parking spaces from the car park? commented 2025-12-19 03:23:12 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦152 |
| 176026661 (Comments: 2) | Lili178 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Également c'est très important de rajouter les sources de tes modifications ! comme "survey", "knowledge", "BD Ortho IGN", etc... Ça nous indique où tu as eu l'information de tes ... commented 2025-12-19 01:50:21 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 175940019 (Comments: 1) | m4rc2a (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Magst du bitte für zukünftige Änderungen eine sinnvollere Zusammenfassung als "Automatisch erzeugte Zusammenfassung" verfassen? Hinweise dazu findest du im Artikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_com... commented 2025-12-19 01:34:17 UTC by rohieb ♦135 |
| 160175479 (Comments: 2) | karr4s (Discussed changesets: 17) | En effet. Merci de la correction. ;) commented 2025-12-19 01:19:27 UTC by karr4s ♦45 |
| 176117319 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | this is still within the road commented 2025-12-19 01:04:36 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176117311 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | this is still in the middle of the road/parking lot, and now that camera:mount=pole has been added it makes the positioning highly unlikely unless the parking lot has been completely rebuilt since around February of this year, as there is no good rea... commented 2025-12-19 01:02:55 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 173817708 (Comments: 1) | nagatha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello nagatha, Can you map Aspari 1 and Aspari 2 grama sachivalayams to the points you added ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260623357 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260623356 ) commented 2025-12-19 00:45:47 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦612 |
| 159245451 (Comments: 1) | MaliMrav (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ова ТОИ је већ додата, али грешком у Смедереву: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12006381761 па ћу их спојити у једну... commented 2025-12-19 00:36:39 UTC by sm4rk0 ♦12 |
| 176018950 (Comments: 2) | pierre_mo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Après avoir vérifier plusieurs de tes changesets, j'ai revert l'entièreté de tes modifications car les noeuds était mal tagué comme celui-ci par exemple, et mal placé, dupliqué ou just... commented 2025-12-19 00:36:09 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 176109871 (Comments: 7) | The Real McQueen Lake (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am having second thoughts about the *names* of these trails. I wonder if they are surveyable on the ground. If not, maybe the names need removing. If they are surveyable, some abbreviations might need expanding ("McQueen Lk Blue XC Tr"). commented 2025-12-19 00:32:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,500 |
 | 172312196 (Comments: 1) | Mike Ortega (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, it seems you deleted intentially several microbus expreso routes, the route relation for NIC-2 and other routes as well. Please stop it and correct your errors. commented 2025-12-19 00:28:27 UTC by Nia-gara ♦7 |
| 176071155 (Comments: 1) | Mora3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176071155 commented 2025-12-19 00:04:04 UTC by Glassman ♦5,663 |
| 176070963 (Comments: 1) | Mora3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | #TIP: when adding units to a building with multiple businesses, add each business as a node. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176070963 commented 2025-12-19 00:03:35 UTC by Glassman ♦5,663 |
| 175636865 (Comments: 10) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hola, Mañana miro a ver si me reinstalo Telegram y lo comentamos, que desde que cambié de teléfono estoy muy desconectado de los debates de la comunidad. commented 2025-12-18 23:42:10 UTC by Arturo Francisco Barbero ♦53 |
 | 176030637 (Comments: 2) | Techtips3000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ofc and almost everytime I get to complete my work correctly. But since I have the Goal to Mark all of the Streets and I do a lot of them in the past I do sometimes oversee this mistakes. Happy Mapping :) commented 2025-12-18 23:10:20 UTC by Techtips3000 ♦2 |
| 175948725 (Comments: 3) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 197) | Obwodnica Łomży również była oznaczona jako trunk do czasu otwarcia drugiej nitki commented 2025-12-18 23:08:22 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦838 |
| 176114589 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:58:21 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112963 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:57:26 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112849 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:56:55 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112829 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:56:31 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112791 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:56:20 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112778 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:55:33 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112754 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:55:22 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112643 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:55:02 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112578 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:54:30 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112553 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:54:15 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112533 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:54:04 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
 | 147694324 (Comments: 1) | damjang (Discussed changesets: 57) | Perché hai tolto il fixme "relation to be deleted because it is not a route physically marked on the ground (see "signed" on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking)" Quali segni hai rilevato sul terreno e dove sono?... commented 2025-12-18 22:53:20 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦123 |
| 176112517 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:51:23 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112435 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road (i95 at that), I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:51:11 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112207 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:49:10 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112180 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:48:58 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112135 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:48:42 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112109 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:48:29 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112098 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:47:49 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112061 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:47:17 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176112051 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:47:04 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111636 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:46:20 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111618 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:46:07 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111600 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:45:53 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111553 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:45:10 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111494 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:42:44 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111412 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:39:15 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111431 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:39:08 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 175593721 (Comments: 2) | HellMap (Discussed changesets: 83) | The 8th cycle of LĢIA/LVM aerial is now available for East Latvia from 2024 (and middle Latvia from 2023 since last year). But you have to register and sign a license individually to get (proper) access. See towards the end of: https://osmlatvija.zu... commented 2025-12-18 22:37:50 UTC by HellMap ♦798 |
| 126877875 (Comments: 2) | tobji (Discussed changesets: 10) | The bus stop had no information, which has since been filled in by imports. It is resolved now. commented 2025-12-18 22:37:16 UTC by tobji ♦15 |
| 176111376 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:36:00 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111343 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:35:24 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111333 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:35:10 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111285 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:34:51 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111275 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:33:19 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111252 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:33:03 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111239 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:32:38 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111208 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:32:25 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111191 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:31:46 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111183 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:31:34 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 163464713 (Comments: 2) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 205) | Good catch, and good question. I didn't add it directly, but it came from the way it was split/extracted from. I think it may have been because one hotel was a node within a different hotels building area? https://www.openstreetma... commented 2025-12-18 22:31:09 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,072 |
| 176111131 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:27:55 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176096375 (Comments: 1) | Cabvibe (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-18 22:27:06 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176111097 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:26:44 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111057 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:26:34 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176096588 (Comments: 1) | Cabvibe (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nie dajemy reklam do opisów zestawów zmian ani do OSM w ogóle: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-18 22:26:22 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176111030 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:26:20 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176111014 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the parking lot, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:26:08 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176096667 (Comments: 1) | Cabvibe (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nie dajemy reklam do opisów zestawów zmian ani do OSM w ogóle: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-18 22:26:02 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176110993 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:22:18 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176110975 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:21:33 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176110944 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:20:51 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176110920 (Comments: 1) | djk2080 (Discussed changesets: 48) | The ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road, I doubt that the position is correct, please check what the correct position is and fix it happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-12-18 22:20:28 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
| 176096351 (Comments: 3) | Jackie Mauro (Discussed changesets: 2) | I'm sorry you've had issues with trespassing. I'm not going to debate what you are seeing on the ground. But I don't believe putting up signs and barricades are ineffective because a map exists. OpenStreetMap is a geospatia... commented 2025-12-18 22:18:08 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 176063678 (Comments: 1) | lowkeycarts212 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176115337 Będzie zgłoszenie i ban commented 2025-12-18 22:07:15 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176063575 (Comments: 1) | lowkeycarts212 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176115308 Za taką nazwę pójdzie zgłoszenie i będzie ban commented 2025-12-18 22:06:29 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176114431 (Comments: 4) | grelus (Discussed changesets: 72) | No nieźle na siebie wpadliśmy :P Ucieszyłem się, widząc naocznie ukończone ciągi i w końcu siadłem je narysować. commented 2025-12-18 22:00:38 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦335 |
| 175887203 (Comments: 3) | Kavish Kardile (Discussed changesets: 2) | One of this way/1458293108 you mapped look like a parcel of land, more like scattered landuse=residential. commented 2025-12-18 21:59:58 UTC by FajrAl ♦140 |
| 176052988 (Comments: 1) | Sukoon Massage (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176115046 Proszę o dodanie Salonu Masażu w osobnym punkcie w obrębie budynku, ponieważ salon masażu nie obejmuje CAŁEGO budynku, a jedynie lokal na najniższym piętrze. Po... commented 2025-12-18 21:58:59 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 175960935 (Comments: 1) | RezGolf (Discussed changesets: 3) | I've reverted your changes to Cypress Point as they were destructive and littered the course with duplicate course features along with contributed bad mapping practices. Please read up the golf_course wiki before making any further changes. ... commented 2025-12-18 21:48:52 UTC by b-jazz ♦787 |
| 175725928 (Comments: 12) | Open@2025 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Any answer? commented 2025-12-18 21:47:54 UTC by ilias_ ♦403 |
| 176114490 (Comments: 1) | Carto_Ferret (Discussed changesets: 44) | Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery. commented 2025-12-18 21:44:27 UTC by Carto_Ferret ♦46 |
| 134782012 (Comments: 1) | XioNoX (Discussed changesets: 22) | Le Barracuda & SPA n'occupe pas tout le bâtiment, il y a aussi notamment un espace de travail partagé https://www.wojo.com/fr-FR/espaces-de-travail/wojo-brest-la-marina commented 2025-12-18 21:41:54 UTC by trial ♦1,005 |
| 176112106 (Comments: 1) | Jackie Mauro (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again. Please don't remove valid data from OSM. It clear you read my last message, since you responded right away, updating the features access tags. But again you removed them. Please read this page to understand why this action is... commented 2025-12-18 21:40:53 UTC by MassCartog ♦271 |
| 175942117 (Comments: 1) | RB4325 (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248229983, et al When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outl... commented 2025-12-18 21:39:24 UTC by b-jazz ♦787 |
| 135091885 (Comments: 3) | tantomontemontetanto (Discussed changesets: 1) | And thanks even more for fixing it! And even more for mapping road in the first place! commented 2025-12-18 21:31:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
 | 175416364 (Comments: 11) | MK 1 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Thank you! commented 2025-12-18 21:03:07 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦20 |
| 175634985 (Comments: 7) | LovenOutdoors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! commented 2025-12-18 21:00:43 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦20 |
| 176049986 (Comments: 4) | Александр Синявский (Discussed changesets: 13) | ))) По мере возможности. Просто тип покрытия гораздо удобнее, быстрее и большим количеством людей может быть указан через StreetComplete по ... commented 2025-12-18 20:54:56 UTC by Александр Синявский ♦10 |
| 147306646 (Comments: 1) | Ipintza (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122417337/history has underground = 3 that was added in this edit What was meant by this? commented 2025-12-18 20:54:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176112717 (Comments: 1) | AJV02 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-18 20:48:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176111551 (Comments: 1) | alexandrugh2019 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Te rog sa folosesti pe viitor imaginile Mapbox, deoarece sunt cele mai recente si sunt mai bine centrate. O seara buna. commented 2025-12-18 20:47:38 UTC by rarad74 ♦335 |
| 130802112 (Comments: 2) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 49) | Looking at the tagging shop=yes, probably because I couldn't find the shop type while on the phone. Looking online, it seems they've closed, so I mark the shop as disused. commented 2025-12-18 20:43:27 UTC by Robot8A ♦75 |
| 175366141 (Comments: 2) | jogemu (Discussed changesets: 39) | Pravděpodobně seřaďovací návěstidlo (railway:signal:shunting) pro Bohdíkov. Je těžké soudit pouze na základě satelitních snímků. https://osm.org/node/13345552063 commented 2025-12-18 20:27:19 UTC by jogemu ♦46 |
| 176107564 (Comments: 1) | hirtem (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo Hirtem, wenn Gebäude aus OSM einfach gelöscht werden, kann es passieren, dass ein anderer Mapper dieses auf Basis von Luftbildern erneut kartiert. Daher ist es ratsam, ein abgerissene Gebäude von buildung=* nach demolish... commented 2025-12-18 20:26:23 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦48 |
| 166282218 (Comments: 1) | SoyJosueVerde (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12839051432/history has shop = bodega that was added in this edit shop=bodega ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openst... commented 2025-12-18 20:23:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176111418 (Comments: 1) | vipwebdesign (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OSM, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-18 20:18:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175306813 (Comments: 3) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Der Verweis auf die generische private Werbe-Webseite wurde entfernt. Ebenso das allgemein official_name=Notfalltreffpunkt. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-18 20:16:38 UTC by limes11 ♦979 |
| 175849145 (Comments: 1) | knguyen@vauban (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you dragged a node of a highway creating overlapps. If you make an accidental action press the undo button or use `ctrl+z`. I undid the change here. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for... commented 2025-12-18 20:14:45 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 176090142 (Comments: 3) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 6) | For the first fix, the correct changeset link is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176110652 #OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-18 20:14:33 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦66 |
| 176094294 (Comments: 1) | Archeologie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Volgens de website die je hebt toegevoegd stond de Pieckepoort op het huidige Wilhelminaplein en niet in de Binnenstad commented 2025-12-18 20:06:15 UTC by Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier ♦2 |
| 175925721 (Comments: 4) | Alba Clara (Discussed changesets: 2) | parce que sur taginfo on a 913 government=archive et 9 government=archives. commented 2025-12-18 20:03:12 UTC by Alba Clara ♦1 |
| 176109309 (Comments: 1) | milof (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, some of the deletions you made here seem appropriate, because some of the existing building footprints did not accurately represent buildings, however you also deleted a marketplace POI in the process. Worry not; I restored it. just take care whe... commented 2025-12-18 19:58:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 175939408 (Comments: 1) | liamhogan (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458602858, et al When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outline... commented 2025-12-18 19:54:59 UTC by b-jazz ♦787 |
| 176089699 (Comments: 3) | stromnov (Discussed changesets: 1) | natural=wood это древесные насаждения. Благоустройство отмечают именно его деталями - газон, дорожки, лавочки и т.п. только если будете пра... commented 2025-12-18 19:51:54 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| 176103719 (Comments: 2) | leendertva (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dankjewel! commented 2025-12-18 19:45:14 UTC by leendertva ♦1 |
 | 52416755 (Comments: 2) | Puxan (Discussed changesets: 6) | I don't remember this fixme. According to the changelog, a hospital and a residential area were mapped, but they weren't visible in the images from that time or earlier. I suppose my intention back then was to check later if the hospital ap... commented 2025-12-18 19:43:22 UTC by Puxan ♦186 |
| 175930229 (Comments: 3) | edqxzv9b (Discussed changesets: 1) | No worries, we all learn as we go! commented 2025-12-18 19:41:20 UTC by jm428 ♦25 |
| 175861087 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 38) | Orientation changed by accident on Whitecap Boulevard fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176090573 #OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-18 19:39:35 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦66 |
| 176083176 (Comments: 1) | Dimon (Discussed changesets: 2) | не надо помечать стройками то, что еще не строят commented 2025-12-18 19:38:39 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| 176084967 (Comments: 1) | Dimon (Discussed changesets: 2) | там еще ничего не строят. Заменил на proposed commented 2025-12-18 19:38:03 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| 176065209 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 21) | Wrong hgv restriction that was made in this changeset was fixed in changeset 176110650. #OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-18 19:37:15 UTC by JakovBušić ♦29 |
| 167139231 (Comments: 1) | CMMaia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Boa noite, A feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287157278 que alterou estava corretamente mapeada, e portanto gostaria de perceber o motivo para a alteração. A forma como o Parque Central da Maia estava mapeado &ea... commented 2025-12-18 19:35:17 UTC by dmfr ♦65 |
| 176062377 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 21) | Wrong hgv restriction that was accidentally made in this changeset was fixed in changeset 176110556.#OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-18 19:33:40 UTC by JakovBušić ♦29 |
| 176097081 (Comments: 2) | max_richter (Discussed changesets: 1) | name=Beach pole verwijderd. commented 2025-12-18 19:31:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 162982726 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 575) | spróbowałem trochę bardziej go wycofać w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176110482 commented 2025-12-18 19:30:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176013139 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 21) | Wrong hgv restriction accidentally made in this changeset was fixed in changeset 176110466. #OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-18 19:30:49 UTC by JakovBušić ♦29 |
| 176012928 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 21) | Wrong restriction accidentally made in this changeset was fixed in changeset 176110390 . #OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-18 19:28:44 UTC by JakovBušić ♦29 |
| 176109574 (Comments: 1) | Hauseink (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. Ik heb een officetag toegevoegd en de info samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-18 19:27:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176012710 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 21) | Wrong hgv restriction that was made in this changeset was corrected in 176110212 commented 2025-12-18 19:26:02 UTC by JakovBušić ♦29 |
| 176110229 (Comments: 1) | SkiesMK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wanting to know if it is good practice to connect sidewalks to intersection when there is no direct paved sidewalk. Look at South Park Dr. & Woodbridge Dr. for example commented 2025-12-18 19:25:01 UTC by SkiesMK ♦1 |
| 158295024 (Comments: 1) | ZinaidaZ (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2324747561/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:17:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 134931485 (Comments: 1) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 117) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10814063564/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:17:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 77088419 (Comments: 1) | zvolsky (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2302938695/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:17:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 152816667 (Comments: 1) | komaares (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11988526269/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:17:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 168382170 (Comments: 2) | aTarom (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi, it comes from version 5 (V6 only added "addr:country"), which had a “fix_me”. I changed it to “fixme” to make it more visible. Do you think it would be better to remove it? commented 2025-12-18 19:07:15 UTC by aTarom ♦856 |
| 138126867 (Comments: 2) | philippec (Discussed changesets: 65) | Noodcentrale took a list of AEDs and mapped them without any knowledge nor surveying. I should have made notes from them all, but I painstakingly tried to solve them. This is an AED we are not sure of existende neither place. I will delete it. commented 2025-12-18 19:05:44 UTC by philippec ♦750 |
| 160168199 (Comments: 1) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 117) | in which way https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6539074/history is broke? I see that this edit added fixme=broken to it, but it is not obvious how it is broken (except that it likely should not have been mapped in OSM in the first place) commented 2025-12-18 19:04:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176108784 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 92) | the reason this is so geographically large is because I opened the route to look at it, didn't do anything with it, closed it and iD applied some auto formatting, it was not intentional. commented 2025-12-18 19:04:15 UTC by Udarian ♦602 |
 | 36406452 (Comments: 2) | andi9876 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi. I don't know too, not have any info about that. commented 2025-12-18 19:03:41 UTC by andi9876 ♦298 |
| 171226702 (Comments: 2) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 407) | and yes, FIX_ME was there previously - but if it is contentless, then maybe better to get rid of it? commented 2025-12-18 19:02:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 20565929 (Comments: 1) | bgruen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2671943289/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:01:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 120708651 (Comments: 1) | nilodo (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9724895464/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:00:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 35410706 (Comments: 1) | d003232 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3842824035/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:00:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 118985227 (Comments: 1) | Mtngy (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9610991628/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:00:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 16773779 (Comments: 1) | Schmidtle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2368140110/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:00:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 10979297 (Comments: 1) | hellraiser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1674676697/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 19:00:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 126078992 (Comments: 2) | user_5589 (Discussed changesets: 58) | No idea what the fixme tag is about. All I was doing was running through tagging errors highlighted by iD and sorting them out where its suggestions were appropriate. In that case it was getting rid of the block capitals in the fixme ta... commented 2025-12-18 18:58:59 UTC by user_5589 ♦58 |
| 176034625 (Comments: 3) | Yurii_l (Discussed changesets: 1) | кто-то их расставляет, а вы их убираете, значит )) в приложении EveryDoor например, отдельные поля посвящены автоматическому копированию а... commented 2025-12-18 18:58:47 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| 176008658 (Comments: 1) | zoeiuga (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonsoir, Ce panneau publicitaire semble être un doublon de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12328834344 Est-ce bien celui-ci ? https://explore.panoramax.fr/?focus=pic&map=19.18/45.1938337/5.725034&pic=14220ee5-c45e-46... commented 2025-12-18 18:57:35 UTC by pyrog ♦384 |
| 176044399 (Comments: 1) | JEHO87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, eine Anmerkung zu deinen Änderungen: Gebäudenummern sind in der Regel kein "name" , sondern "ref". In OSM wird nicht abgekürzt, d. h. wenn schon, dann bitte als "Gebäude" ausschreiben.... commented 2025-12-18 18:57:18 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 175605654 (Comments: 1) | Thierry Beuret (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13358471501/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:54:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 175151227 (Comments: 1) | Christophe MAÏTAN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13333691439/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:54:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 160347263 (Comments: 1) | Hopla57 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12430539583/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:54:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 21572852 (Comments: 1) | sfrank (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2777385616/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:54:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 115101281 (Comments: 1) | Dario CT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9348919840/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:54:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 41006861 (Comments: 1) | ButterflyOfFire_ (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4319244707/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:54:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 146050988 (Comments: 3) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 59) | getting back to it - tracktype=grade1 conflicts with surface=dirt which one of them is accurate? commented 2025-12-18 18:54:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176049473 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Lenz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Eine Anmerkung zu diesem Änderungssatz: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das l&oum... commented 2025-12-18 18:54:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176083915 (Comments: 1) | FFWBavendorf (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hallo, eine Anmerkung zu diesen Hydranten: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den ... commented 2025-12-18 18:51:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176019201 (Comments: 3) | A-dg6 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hm. Dacht ik het eens goed te doen… :/ De gebruikte editor is namelijk *gemaakt* om makkelijk busroutes te bewerken. Nou ja, het zal wel. commented 2025-12-18 18:46:25 UTC by A-dg6 ♦12 |
| 175769621 (Comments: 1) | acubens71 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Merci pour ces contributions dans le Bugey... C'est un peu une galère ces grands polygones CORINE LandCover... commented 2025-12-18 18:45:41 UTC by MDe ♦14 |
| 175709185 (Comments: 1) | Vojtěch Mikeš (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap is not place for mapping utterly gone and not longer existing railway features, gone without any traces whatsoever https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ is a good place for mapping them commented 2025-12-18 18:43:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 175953856 (Comments: 1) | zoeiuga (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonsoir, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13377941389 Cet objet n'est pas vraiment un poteau directionnel. C'est plutôt un panneau d'information. Le tag name est "descriptif". D'aprè... commented 2025-12-18 18:43:38 UTC by pyrog ♦384 |
| 176099105 (Comments: 1) | Piotr Proszowski (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lasy lasami jednak w tej edycji użyłeś podkładu Bing który bywa przesunięty więc i las trochę niedorobiony. Staraj się też rysować po pniach a nie po liściach. W Polsce używamy podkładu geoportalu a pozostałe jako dodatkowy po... commented 2025-12-18 18:43:17 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦583 |
| 176096370 (Comments: 1) | mikiscom (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo, zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962340701: Der Weg ist so weit (rund 25 m) von der Straße entfernt, dass „separate“ und use_sidepath hier nicht mehr greifen. (Da an dem Nebenweg Vz 240 ausgewiesen ist, müsste dan... commented 2025-12-18 18:32:17 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
 | 164840458 (Comments: 1) | CK27 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12749314865/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:31:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 30598581 (Comments: 1) | Männedorf (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3485281324/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:31:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 145285336 (Comments: 1) | gunnar1m (Discussed changesets: 78) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11431846482/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:31:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 5204446 (Comments: 1) | mplusplus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/814516995/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:31:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 52275875 (Comments: 1) | CartoCharles (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1277151631/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:31:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 114485836 (Comments: 1) | Javierru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9305774071/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:31:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 175954930 (Comments: 2) | zoeiuga (Discussed changesets: 4) | Le nom est "descriptif" : ce n'est pas adapté dans OSM. Il faut utiliser des tags dédiés et à défaut le tag note ou fixme. fishing=permit que sur cette zone, sur toutes les berges de l'Is&... commented 2025-12-18 18:31:04 UTC by pyrog ♦384 |
| 138037848 (Comments: 3) | complete_gth (Discussed changesets: 52) | probably some autosuggestion incident :) thanks for fixing it! commented 2025-12-18 18:31:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 175951730 (Comments: 8) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 575) | Nie, ponieważ ta osoba chwaliła się dodawaniem edycji z Google Maps + dodawaniem celowo błędnych danych. commented 2025-12-18 18:27:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176108259 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 124) | + przeniesienie adresów na obszary commented 2025-12-18 18:25:48 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦335 |
| 22991647 (Comments: 3) | Garstig (Discussed changesets: 4) | thanks! Especially for so old edit commented 2025-12-18 18:25:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 57449967 (Comments: 1) | _Garrison_ (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2919112180/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:20:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 16021079 (Comments: 1) | andrewpmk (Discussed changesets: 81) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1748259867/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:20:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 152446504 (Comments: 1) | TheMonroeMapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/774799539/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:20:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 171515438 (Comments: 1) | ilikeeditingandcontributing (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13121747306/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:19:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 141796633 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 159) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3457347136/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:19:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
 | 118469710 (Comments: 1) | Nicolas Chavent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5366831723/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:15:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 33712142 (Comments: 2) | OMNIBUS (Discussed changesets: 6) | wait, I see it - and in this case https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964660779/history wetland is mapped so I will delete that node commented 2025-12-18 18:14:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 62404208 (Comments: 2) | francine andromaque gagne (Discussed changesets: 1) | is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5892999214/history a shop selling charcoal fuel? commented 2025-12-18 18:13:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 63256611 (Comments: 2) | racky (Discussed changesets: 6) | In this case you added name=Blanchisserie is it shop=laundry ? Is it having own name? commented 2025-12-18 18:12:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 63356073 (Comments: 1) | Doche (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5970004124/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:11:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 62374788 (Comments: 1) | Guy Maurel KONAN (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5890700795/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:11:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 62345686 (Comments: 1) | Coulio nigno zié (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5887991070/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:11:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 61933803 (Comments: 1) | AGUETON (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5852249712/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:11:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 61902066 (Comments: 1) | kowao bruce (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5849899586/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:11:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 61960985 (Comments: 1) | AristideK (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5853850088/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:11:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
 | 8459066 (Comments: 1) | cucu (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1327837853/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? commented 2025-12-18 18:11:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176020926 (Comments: 2) | A-dg6 (Discussed changesets: 16) | De halte is opgeheven in de oosterlijke richting, maar niet richting het station, hoewel deze halte niet is opgenomen in de dienstregeling voor de 86/87 gek genoeg. commented 2025-12-18 18:07:17 UTC by A-dg6 ♦12 |
| 165861540 (Comments: 4) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonjour. La meilleure approche est de consulter la documentation disponible sur osm.wiki. La page sur highway=track contient [un guide d'aide à la prise de décision](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track#decide). Gr... commented 2025-12-18 18:03:06 UTC by webfil ♦36 |
| 104448803 (Comments: 1) | brianboru (Discussed changesets: 115) | Hello Brian, In relation to this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5095889 is there a reason for the `so=residential` tag added to some of the houses in this changeset or is it simply a mistake? Kind regards, Kits commented 2025-12-18 17:56:04 UTC by kitsee ♦120 |
| 176088281 (Comments: 2) | Lexy Realty Group (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. See https://www.osm.org/changeset/176106364 commented 2025-12-18 17:37:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 170766116 (Comments: 1) | Gilbert84 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hola, era justo al revés: una área residencial no debe llevar nombre, y el nodo borrado era un elemento estadístico (tiene referencia del INE), por lo que ha de permanecer separado. No te preocupes por esto, ya está... commented 2025-12-18 17:36:26 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦242 |
| 176097650 (Comments: 1) | Øystein H (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei, ser at du har endra bl.a. Kirkegata fra highway=secondary til highway=primary, hva er grunnen til det? Iht. wiki er fylkesveger med fire sifre secondary, kun de med to/tre sifre er primary (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norway/Highways). O... commented 2025-12-18 17:24:49 UTC by norgis ♦14 |
| 136076021 (Comments: 2) | trenki (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, it is the grading, where in .it they use the "Schall" variant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_ferrata?useskin=vector#Grading commented 2025-12-18 17:15:21 UTC by trenki ♦1 |
| 165481361 (Comments: 1) | Wollebrunn (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, du hast die Tiefgaragenzufahrt als building=garage eingetragen, da ja das Gebäude selber keine Garage ist, wäre ein passenderer Tag dafür building=parking_entrance. Habs aktualisiert. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-18 17:12:20 UTC by Herr Bause ♦5 |
| 38814440 (Comments: 1) | t2425b (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hat die vor 9 Jahren vorgeschlagene Radinfrastruktur noch irgendeine Bedeutung? Das Tagging ist auch etwas unglücklich. proposed wäre besser als prefix verwendet. proposed:cycleway commented 2025-12-18 17:11:03 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,465 |
| 176097229 (Comments: 1) | Krzysiek5757 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Co to znaczy „usunięcie zbędnych oznaczeń”? Przecież te obiekty nadal istnieją? commented 2025-12-18 16:55:07 UTC by dzamper ♦182 |
 | 174643533 (Comments: 1) | yamada-as (Discussed changesets: 6) | مرحباً، لقد أدخلت اسم عربي في خانة الاسم يرجى استبداله بالاسم المحلي المستخدم في هذه المنطقة commented 2025-12-18 16:50:47 UTC by VLD0251 ♦11 |
| 176103090 (Comments: 3) | Thunderstruck (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem.. commented 2025-12-18 16:50:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175031482 (Comments: 3) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 137) | 1) Semafory nanosi się zawsze na tor, do którego się odnoszą 2) Od dawna miała być wprowadzona poprawka do NSI, żeby nie poprawiało automatycznie "PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe" - niedawno była standaryzacja `operator=*` <... commented 2025-12-18 16:22:56 UTC by Anas masuris ♦154 |
| 175414695 (Comments: 2) | fudoreaper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oh good! Yes OSM now looks better than before, closer to its actual alignment. Still not quite sure about pedestrian crossings, maybe we can update in the spring or after a survey (but harder to survey in winter) commented 2025-12-18 16:10:50 UTC by fudoreaper ♦5 |
| 163284307 (Comments: 2) | PPete2 (Discussed changesets: 46) | correct, "2" has been ment, thank you! commented 2025-12-18 16:02:29 UTC by PPete2 ♦139 |
| 175427952 (Comments: 1) | Menir_PMI (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. When a building on the edge of a task continues on the adjacent task, please map the whole building rather than halt at the edge. Best regards commented 2025-12-18 16:00:55 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176099880 (Comments: 4) | Roengoer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Het lijkt dan 'verkeerd', maar het ligt juist goed. commented 2025-12-18 15:58:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176060740 (Comments: 3) | fudoreaper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks for you reply. I think it can wait until one of us is able to visit the park in person to confirm. commented 2025-12-18 15:56:26 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦65 |
| 132125310 (Comments: 6) | MRCento (Discussed changesets: 2) | Se non ci sono più tracce della tranvia non è più qualcosa di attuale e va quindi fuori dall'idea di OSM, che difatti nella pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic... commented 2025-12-18 15:50:41 UTC by AwFi ♦45 |
| 176101707 (Comments: 2) | Roengoer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Het adres heb ik teruggeplaatst.. Mapse commented 2025-12-18 15:48:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175572810 (Comments: 1) | Asror Tajriba (Discussed changesets: 8) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-18 15:43:22 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176098972 (Comments: 1) | Roengoer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Volgens mij is niet alles goed gegaan. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176098972 Svp niet naar de dakran... commented 2025-12-18 15:39:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176101102 (Comments: 1) | Oxeelix (Discussed changesets: 14) | References decision for this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4905230 commented 2025-12-18 15:31:12 UTC by Oxeelix ♦9 |
| 176095634 (Comments: 2) | Tea Kettle 1984 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kruispunt hersteld commented 2025-12-18 15:29:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175718175 (Comments: 1) | EdGB91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thanks for your changes, might I recommend using the square up tool in id editor to make houses have nice square corners, (shortcut q) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1757181... commented 2025-12-18 15:27:06 UTC by Mex ♦77 |
| 175601170 (Comments: 1) | Scott Reeves (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. PLease do not map simple buildings as a multipolygon . These tags are to be used where a building has a courtyard inside it. And, square each building with the Q key while selected. Best regards commented 2025-12-18 15:23:50 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 176091831 (Comments: 2) | allegropower (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok commented 2025-12-18 15:19:54 UTC by allegropower ♦1 |
| 162233656 (Comments: 1) | waielbi (Discussed changesets: 5) | Vous avez ajouté la post_box B0H0E0 à la BOC8S2. BOC8S2 existe encore ? Est-ce une double post_box ? commented 2025-12-18 15:04:23 UTC by LudovicG ♦113 |
| 175764573 (Comments: 22) | Matthieu HUGOT (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merci aussi à toi pour les infos/suivi officiel commented 2025-12-18 15:03:29 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦50 |
| 175858931 (Comments: 1) | Vitley (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is a private facility. There is no public access except to customers. Even if there were then it would be access=permissive, not foot=yes. commented 2025-12-18 14:53:01 UTC by InsertUser ♦466 |
| 176088180 (Comments: 1) | Dhanvantari Hospital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-18 14:46:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176086756 (Comments: 1) | Anzalone Drilling Pumps LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-18 14:46:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176086440 (Comments: 1) | Salex Benoit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-18 14:46:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176085743 (Comments: 1) | puragenactivcarb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-18 14:46:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 175858982 (Comments: 1) | Vitley (Discussed changesets: 3) | `foot=yes` indicates that everyone has the legal right to access a place on foot. This is a private jetty, there is no public access. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access commented 2025-12-18 14:43:18 UTC by InsertUser ♦466 |
| 176094848 (Comments: 1) | AskerGarry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-18 14:43:07 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176089988 (Comments: 3) | Oxford Innovation Space (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for confirming - I've restored the building in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176098426 commented 2025-12-18 14:40:55 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,706 |
| 176040410 (Comments: 2) | Lubomir Kukuca (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok, vdaka. commented 2025-12-18 14:39:41 UTC by Lubomir Kukuca ♦1 |
| 176047488 (Comments: 1) | ALu68 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hi there. Why are you destroying routing again? Yopu did this already TWICE! Some kind of map sabotage? I've already fixed the routing here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175955864 I cannot even test the new design (routers t... commented 2025-12-18 14:37:23 UTC by vmicho ♦84 |
| 176074548 (Comments: 1) | Eric Sofen (Discussed changesets: 8) | New York commented 2025-12-18 14:29:19 UTC by giftifada12 ♦1 |
| 176086141 (Comments: 3) | bpiotrowicz86 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Raczej bicycle=yes, tak jak oznaczamy na ciągach pieszo-rowerowych na poziomie ziemi. Również pamiętam, że kładka miała być pieszo-rowerowa (dla podziału, by nikt normalny nie jechałby w nowootwartym już tunelu), ale pewnie przepisy ... commented 2025-12-18 14:27:38 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦335 |
| 176000821 (Comments: 1) | Matteo Scomparin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Matteo, la posizione di questo agriturismo è un po' strana, si trova a bordo strada. La posizione è corretta? commented 2025-12-18 14:08:49 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,806 |
| 176035511 (Comments: 1) | FrankiiB (Discussed changesets: 3) | This change deleted a bunch of roads, I've reverted this change and will look to fix the issue, looks like you were trying to fix a dragged node, and instead removed the whole road. --- Published usi... commented 2025-12-18 13:50:01 UTC by Mex ♦77 |
| 175981860 (Comments: 1) | Werner_Wanderfreund (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Werner :) du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Im großen und ganzen sieht es ganz ok aus. Ein paar Fragen bzw. Anmerkungen hätte ich jedoch: - Quelle "offizielle GPX": Was... commented 2025-12-18 13:40:01 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 176095451 (Comments: 1) | coatix (Discussed changesets: 2) | see https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/11636 commented 2025-12-18 13:35:06 UTC by coatix ♦10 |
| 176095441 (Comments: 1) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 271) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog/57996/517 commented 2025-12-18 13:32:20 UTC by voltairovicz ♦237 |
| 176050838 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 575) | Hi, Mateusz! I think that amenity=audiologist makes sense, because other major healthcare facilities are tagged with amenity=*. Adding healthcare=audiologist to amenity=audiologist would be useful, but mere deletion of correct tag? commented 2025-12-18 13:29:35 UTC by Something B ♦149 |
| 176093192 (Comments: 2) | FC070 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Het adres heb ik hersteld en het bedrijf op de nieuwe locatie toegevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-18 13:23:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
 | 161562494 (Comments: 2) | themartinix (Discussed changesets: 25) | Ok; merci pour votre correction :-)... regards, Martin commented 2025-12-18 13:06:55 UTC by themartinix ♦19 |
| 176084602 (Comments: 2) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 56) | Thanks for the information. TEC unfortunately still shows the old data. Map data is now fixed. commented 2025-12-18 13:02:27 UTC by multimob ♦82 |
| 147407108 (Comments: 2) | fra0000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, yes thanks I changed the tag :) commented 2025-12-18 12:52:03 UTC by fra0000 ♦1 |
| 176072261 (Comments: 2) | mednajat (Discussed changesets: 1) | either vandalism or an error. reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176093735 commented 2025-12-18 12:51:23 UTC by ilias_ ♦403 |
| 176078103 (Comments: 1) | AnteŽunić (Discussed changesets: 26) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed along with the incorrect tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176093433 commented 2025-12-18 12:46:36 UTC by TinPetreković ♦212 |
| 176008396 (Comments: 3) | Пащук Н (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-18 12:46:18 UTC by Пащук Н ♦1 |
| 175704740 (Comments: 1) | da_real (Discussed changesets: 2) | Im Naturschutzgebiet Wahner Heide dürfen nur Wege betreten werden, die mit einem Holzpfahl mit rotem Ende versehen sind (oder im Wegeplan auf den öffentlichen Schildern als betretbar eingetragen sind). Bei keinem deiner jüngst eingetra... commented 2025-12-18 12:35:10 UTC by yves klein ♦25 |
| 175930956 (Comments: 2) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 346) | Bedankt. Ik heb het aangepast. commented 2025-12-18 12:26:26 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,041 |
| 146290138 (Comments: 3) | gosgtan (Discussed changesets: 9) | Oui ça date en effet..! Ok ça marche je vais remettre à comme c'était initialement en attendant. commented 2025-12-18 12:10:52 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦187 |
| 176069660 (Comments: 4) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 125) | Serio? Znowu to samo? Tydzień temu pisałem, żebyś nie usuwał bezmyślnie obiektów, żeby je za chwilę dodać ponownie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175751457. Wielokrotnie byłeś już o tym informowany, ale jak widać uwagi o... commented 2025-12-18 11:59:46 UTC by YomanNH ♦428 |
| 176091362 (Comments: 1) | NANDINIJADHAV (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Please stop editing in Denmark - to many errors and not correct mapping. Here there is hedge where you map a highway over. I will soon info- OSM DWG if you not stop. I have been writting seravels message in the changesets - seems not... commented 2025-12-18 11:58:16 UTC by AE35 ♦44 |
| 176058206 (Comments: 1) | AnteŽunić (Discussed changesets: 26) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176091594 commented 2025-12-18 11:57:39 UTC by TinPetreković ♦212 |
| 176091051 (Comments: 1) | NANDINIJADHAV (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Please don't map highway=residential when it's a service way plus you also map a footway/steps as highway=residential. Maybe you should stop mapping in this MapRoulette challenge? commented 2025-12-18 11:48:25 UTC by AE35 ♦44 |
| 176090866 (Comments: 1) | NANDINIJADHAV (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi again This is not highway=residential - please use highway=service for these kinds of roads. best regards commented 2025-12-18 11:42:15 UTC by AE35 ♦44 |
| 176089956 (Comments: 1) | NANDINIJADHAV (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi again This service road is not map so well. Please map when you see the path/road on the imagery commented 2025-12-18 11:39:01 UTC by AE35 ♦44 |
| 176052967 (Comments: 1) | AnteŽunić (Discussed changesets: 26) | Nodes that were accidentally created have been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176090595 commented 2025-12-18 11:33:52 UTC by TinPetreković ♦212 |
| 176084347 (Comments: 1) | Cabvibe (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tu jak w poprzedniej edycji nazwa niby ma z obiektu stworzyć ... warsztat. Jakieś dziwne hashtag-i. Co to jest za źródło streetlevel imagery. Poprzednicy tez zostawili w source UM Katowice a śmiem wątpić by aktualnym źr&oacu... commented 2025-12-18 11:30:13 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦583 |
| 175977160 (Comments: 2) | Infinite00 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, ich werde in einer Woche vor Ort sein und das prüfen. Vorerst nehme ich den Weg erst mal raus. Danke für den Hinweis! commented 2025-12-18 11:22:56 UTC by Infinite00 ♦3 |
| 154718746 (Comments: 2) | mk2k22 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, I believe the lettering grade is commonly used in Slovenia and neighboring countries. You could probably also use the value 2 instead of B here. commented 2025-12-18 11:22:36 UTC by mk2k22 ♦37 |
| 122944021 (Comments: 2) | lenny32 (Discussed changesets: 18) | You're right, I'll correct it. commented 2025-12-18 11:21:22 UTC by lenny32 ♦66 |
 | 176037486 (Comments: 1) | Pia Luisa Licaros (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1454589568, https://www.osm.org/way/1454589571. What is the mean of the tag 20.12 = 20.12? commented 2025-12-18 11:16:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176089742 (Comments: 1) | NANDINIJADHAV (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi again Please only map if you can see a road - here there is no road . it's in the garden. Instead skip the MapRoulette task. And again please use the SDFI Aerial Imagery as your source and not the ESRI World imagery. Best regard... commented 2025-12-18 11:16:33 UTC by AE35 ♦44 |
| 176000825 (Comments: 3) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 204) | Dzięki! commented 2025-12-18 11:14:57 UTC by YomanNH ♦428 |
| 176083147 (Comments: 2) | Cabvibe (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reklama, reklama już od rana. Człowieku, reklamę wklejasz do komentarza ? Firma zajmuje cały budynek ??? a oprócz tego kompletnie brakuje znaczników które pozwoliły by odbiorcom danych zidentyfikować ten obiekt jako ... commented 2025-12-18 11:13:25 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦583 |
| 171377855 (Comments: 1) | jeka p (Discussed changesets: 115) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426713146/history has via_ferrata_scale = B that was added in this edit What via_ferrata_scale = B means? It is not listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:via%20ferrata%20scale commented 2025-12-18 11:10:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 163898717 (Comments: 1) | ncerni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194188097/history has traffic_calming = 30 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-18 11:09:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176088025 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 915) | For the record, I was not aware that the phone key supports providing multiple numbers separated by semicolon. commented 2025-12-18 11:08:43 UTC by VJMK ♦7 |
| 176089293 (Comments: 1) | NANDINIJADHAV (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi there You are using and an old image - ESRI World (10 years old) which is not up-to-date. You should the SDFI Aerial Imagery instead - which are from 2025 -much better and you can see the roads more clearly now. Best regards commented 2025-12-18 11:05:56 UTC by AE35 ♦44 |
| 176043472 (Comments: 1) | Filippo Arnaldi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1459250264 (One of nearly a hundred objects). What is the mean of the tags artificial = F cod = R45500400108000000 id = 6435010 natura = 1 ogr_fid = 25088 origine = 2 sottopass... commented 2025-12-18 10:51:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176086844 (Comments: 3) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 15) | Elle était sur un gros mat, je suis sûr à 99 %. Ça ferait très moche sinon^^. Elle était clairement là pour éviter les nombreux vols sur les c... commented 2025-12-18 10:43:09 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦50 |
| 176081367 (Comments: 2) | Daham (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hmm, wahrscheinlich lohnt es sich, dafür noch bis nächstes Jahr zu warten, bis alles endgültig fertig ist. Dann ist der Eindruck besser - ich vermute mal, daß da zB noch ein Geländer hinkommt, dann sieht es mehr wie eine Br&... commented 2025-12-18 10:40:23 UTC by Daham ♦12 |
| 176045964 (Comments: 1) | Hacker3k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, are you saying that the library is not active? If so then we wouldn't really map it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459277814 commented 2025-12-18 10:40:07 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦355 |
| 175966993 (Comments: 3) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Je kan in ieder geval het groen wat in de openbare ruimte staat mappen. Van privétuinen blijven we over het algemeen af. commented 2025-12-18 10:31:51 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦34 |
| 122948969 (Comments: 2) | brianboru (Discussed changesets: 115) | finger trouble - just delete commented 2025-12-18 10:26:15 UTC by brianboru ♦159 |
| 176048823 (Comments: 6) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | we will take a look how we can improve the quality without canibalizing the user experience. thank you for your valuable input. commented 2025-12-18 10:18:25 UTC by chnuessli ♦121 |
| 129646874 (Comments: 2) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | I deleted the mentioned node. we will take a look how we can improve the quality without canibalizing the user experience. thank you for your valuable input. commented 2025-12-18 10:17:35 UTC by chnuessli ♦121 |
| 147037370 (Comments: 1) | perenniallylate (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87845044/history has roof = flat that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=flat was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ke... commented 2025-12-18 10:16:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 143369311 (Comments: 1) | EST19 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536428964/history has roof = flat that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=flat was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/K... commented 2025-12-18 10:16:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 127029105 (Comments: 1) | MaxAttack (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242785057/history has roof = flat that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=flat was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/K... commented 2025-12-18 10:16:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 65814687 (Comments: 1) | BowralMapper (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658395424/history has roof = flat that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=flat was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/K... commented 2025-12-18 10:15:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176079526 (Comments: 1) | Thejos16 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-18 10:12:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 172278932 (Comments: 1) | Julien39 (Discussed changesets: 103) | J’ai un doute sur la largeur que t’as renseigné qui correspond ni aux documents d’exploitation que j’ai sous la main, ni à la page Wikipedia que t’as liée. Tu t’es basé sur quoi ? commented 2025-12-18 10:05:24 UTC by Lejun ♦504 |
| 176086502 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 16) | See earlier similar edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160395320 commented 2025-12-18 10:01:37 UTC by sahshoor ♦24 |
| 176012708 (Comments: 2) | krawieck (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dzięki za pomoc! :) commented 2025-12-18 09:58:37 UTC by krawieck ♦1 |
| 176014508 (Comments: 2) | Modern Barbershop and Salon (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176086478 commented 2025-12-18 09:54:29 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,613 |
| 175463917 (Comments: 4) | BBJIB (Discussed changesets: 11) | besten dank :) commented 2025-12-18 09:54:26 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 176014631 (Comments: 2) | COST CUTTERS at Webster (Discussed changesets: 1) | ❌ Fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/176036570 commented 2025-12-18 09:53:58 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,613 |
 | 176014691 (Comments: 2) | Hatcha (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/176019635 commented 2025-12-18 09:53:21 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,613 |
| 176003075 (Comments: 2) | COST CUTTERS (Discussed changesets: 1) | ❌ Fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/176036876 commented 2025-12-18 09:52:24 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,613 |
| 175998567 (Comments: 2) | Prime Storage (Discussed changesets: 1) | ❌ Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176040511 commented 2025-12-18 09:51:44 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,613 |
| 163437691 (Comments: 4) | Ana Luisa (Discussed changesets: 41) | jetzt sollte es passen commented 2025-12-18 09:47:30 UTC by Ana Luisa ♦26 |
| 173337094 (Comments: 5) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hallo, ich habe versucht deine Anmerkungen einzuarbeiten. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-18 09:42:43 UTC by SG86 ♦13 |
| 176084447 (Comments: 1) | vietinbank (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176085830 commented 2025-12-18 09:38:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176070915 (Comments: 1) | tenefati (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi tenefati, house number 3 is on the other side of the street .. what is correct now - the location of the store or the newly added adress? Gruß tux67 --- Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2025-12-18 09:37:24 UTC by tux67 ♦2,003 |
| 175862981 (Comments: 1) | Begemott (Discussed changesets: 2) | В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-12-18 09:33:17 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 176076686 (Comments: 3) | Dogtopia of Farragut (Discussed changesets: 1) | ❌ Fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/176079645 commented 2025-12-18 09:28:57 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,613 |
| 175414554 (Comments: 1) | ReecoeB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again I adjusted a lot of inaccurate mapped buildings. See my comments on another changeset And... Quality prevails above quantity Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-12-18 09:28:15 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 174949474 (Comments: 1) | Begemott (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👋 В name не нужно писать тип заведения. Это понятно из других тегов commented 2025-12-18 09:26:26 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175184768 (Comments: 1) | Ilmir888 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-12-18 09:23:42 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 59235316 (Comments: 1) | oliviap_telenav (Discussed changesets: 11) | Navin Court is the incorrect name which you re-assigned it. Navin Place is the correct name which you changed it from. Further evidence can be seen from this real estate listing. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AT8YLwMRSp8 commented 2025-12-18 09:23:18 UTC by firepanda11 ♦4 |
| 176025578 (Comments: 3) | Aylinka (Discussed changesets: 1) | And also fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176085011 commented 2025-12-18 09:22:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176019397 (Comments: 2) | netixgr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Should be corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176058904 commented 2025-12-18 09:18:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 175560436 (Comments: 1) | Reyhaneh Z (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Thanks for mapping A remark. * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. * Please accurately outline all buildings. best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-12-18 09:11:21 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 174896497 (Comments: 2) | Sergey99910 (Discussed changesets: 1) | а, вы уже добавили заметку, окей https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5061945 commented 2025-12-18 09:11:14 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 166724592 (Comments: 3) | Pebimo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hab passende Straßenbilder gefunden. Hat ein Tor am Abzweig der B 237 aufgestellt. Tor ist nun erfasst und Weg auf private. commented 2025-12-18 09:07:32 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 106609202 (Comments: 3) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 124) | cool! many thanks, man! commented 2025-12-18 09:06:43 UTC by Bear-in-a-box ♦56 |
| 175414777 (Comments: 1) | ReecoeB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper. Your mapping does not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM. Often, your mappings don't reflect the real shape of a building. Don't you use a mouse? It is very difficult to dr... commented 2025-12-18 09:00:34 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 129679587 (Comments: 3) | Zenon (Discussed changesets: 5) | I see, but numbering isn't a problem here, I'm talking about those lines starting/ending completely outside of the golf field, this doesn't change with time... :) commented 2025-12-18 08:58:14 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦366 |
| 176024839 (Comments: 3) | MXC48 (Discussed changesets: 1) | En principe c'est déjà fait, il y a un outil qui repère ces petites erreurs de format (et les doublons) https://confusedbuffalo.github.io/phone-report/ Je l'utilise à peu près quotidiennement... commented 2025-12-18 08:56:21 UTC by cquest ♦284 |
| 172878096 (Comments: 2) | gd-wg (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello, yes should be tracktype 4 not 4. Editing failure, sorry. commented 2025-12-18 08:52:26 UTC by gd-wg ♦7 |
| 175693407 (Comments: 1) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi there :) you asked for review in this and the previous changeset. Here's my 2c Looks good. You gave your sources and took care tracing the objects. The pool has been set to private as prescribed. Well done. Should ... commented 2025-12-18 08:36:30 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 157431697 (Comments: 2) | stempifleig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes. I've correted it commented 2025-12-18 08:26:44 UTC by stempifleig ♦1 |
 | 162997215 (Comments: 1) | RoliM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253618031/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype commented 2025-12-18 08:18:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 150503600 (Comments: 1) | dottir34 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143960877/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype commented 2025-12-18 08:18:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 173511899 (Comments: 1) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255621488/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype commented 2025-12-18 08:18:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 132308009 (Comments: 1) | kzmrzzg (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973160650/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype commented 2025-12-18 08:18:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 172386044 (Comments: 1) | CarlFriedrich (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432518373/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype commented 2025-12-18 08:18:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 156570037 (Comments: 1) | arthurd_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824983448/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype commented 2025-12-18 08:12:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176019093 (Comments: 7) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 104) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13381882450 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-12-18 07:42:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176041219 (Comments: 1) | Wandergecko (Discussed changesets: 6) | Moin, hab mal das Wiki befragt. Grundsätzlich dürfte deine Art der Erfassung ausreichend sein. Grüße commented 2025-12-18 07:35:19 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 176022836 (Comments: 1) | Brendar with an 'R' (Discussed changesets: 2) | I reverted it because it bended roads improperly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176080601 commented 2025-12-18 07:33:41 UTC by zyxzyx ♦21 |
| 175998341 (Comments: 3) | Precision IVF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted this changeset in whole because it has nonsensical data in a nonsensical place and also messed up a church geometry. It's not a hospital, the listed address is nowhere near the POI position (which itself is in a seemingly random spot wi... commented 2025-12-18 07:31:52 UTC by DFW-Backyard7 ♦5 |
| 175668232 (Comments: 3) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176080283 commented 2025-12-18 07:24:17 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 176074880 (Comments: 1) | Chrysoberyl5A- aireen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-18 07:24:08 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176073924 (Comments: 1) | Chrysoberyl5A- aireen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-18 07:23:59 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176069139 (Comments: 1) | mow3en4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-18 07:20:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176068958 (Comments: 1) | the_code_king (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-18 07:20:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176070584 (Comments: 1) | ashley9405 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11924611464 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-18 07:18:55 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176059909 (Comments: 1) | adel fouad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-18 07:18:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 175904949 (Comments: 2) | bernardo60 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks FajrAI - this is a useful suggestion, and I am aware that many contributors assume that an unpaved road must be a track. On the other hand, I noticed that many contributors in Bali tag a way as "residential", only because it passes a... commented 2025-12-18 07:15:56 UTC by bernardo60 ♦66 |
| 176071369 (Comments: 1) | S@DB0Y (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Short hint for the value of the key service_times. Is the service held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case, you forgot the day abbreviation Su. By the way, we write the time in 24-hour notation and do not abbrev... commented 2025-12-18 07:09:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176079122 (Comments: 1) | Michael Browning: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-18 07:01:58 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 175994278 (Comments: 1) | DEX004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplicated highway sections removed. commented 2025-12-18 06:56:50 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 176049528 (Comments: 1) | kdziedzic (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-18 06:48:26 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 176046028 (Comments: 1) | kdziedzic (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-18 06:48:17 UTC by bartgron ♦486 |
| 173085464 (Comments: 1) | KipatchiBestOf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Pour info https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1030794225667048 commented 2025-12-18 06:48:09 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦243 |
| 175987208 (Comments: 1) | jetbridge guy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19186 commented 2025-12-18 06:47:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 173648456 (Comments: 8) | Paschberg (Discussed changesets: 18) | Dear Jacopo, sorry I didnt ask exactly. I ment things like that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662418569#map=16/53.78001/-1.43239 **** But thats in UK And as some french say: "The britsh, are they mad?" . In british... commented 2025-12-18 06:45:49 UTC by Paschberg ♦12 |
| 176078557 (Comments: 1) | PavMax (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted my changeset 176077627 uploaded by accident commented 2025-12-18 06:30:16 UTC by PavMax ♦2 |
| 164401148 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 64) | Re-opened yesterday, a bit later than anticipated. I switched everything back to what it was before. Still significant constructions works occurring with temporary detours expected for a few more months. commented 2025-12-18 06:28:07 UTC by eerib ♦220 |
| 176069267 (Comments: 3) | adigis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ahh, of course! 🤦♂️ Thanks for clarifying Happy mapping! commented 2025-12-18 06:27:40 UTC by pwbriggs ♦109 |
| 171359176 (Comments: 4) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | I changed this residential road to a service road in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176078354 commented 2025-12-18 06:23:40 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176077627 (Comments: 1) | PavMax (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset is a mistake and I uploaded it accidentally. Trying to revert it. commented 2025-12-18 06:18:53 UTC by PavMax ♦2 |
| 172806817 (Comments: 1) | eiclu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Warum hast du das den entfernt? Ich finde der construction Key war korrekt hier? :) commented 2025-12-18 06:17:32 UTC by coatix ♦10 |
| 176034202 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 575) | Hej, w numerach telefonów powinien być również numer kierunkowy kraju. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:phone?uselang=pl commented 2025-12-18 06:15:21 UTC by YomanNH ♦428 |
| 176073455 (Comments: 1) | N’DAO Shoreditch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM usually only maps a feature once so I've removed the building, please see:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Regards Bernard, commented 2025-12-18 05:55:15 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,037 |
| 154789526 (Comments: 4) | brownperson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you've added house numbers without street names, making it useless for automatic search. Can you update with appropriate street names, please? commented 2025-12-18 05:54:16 UTC by Sanniu ♦590 |
| 161302745 (Comments: 1) | the_battledroid (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1350871871/history what was meant by tourism=church ? that it is a tourism attraction? commented 2025-12-18 05:51:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 108027 (Comments: 5) | Spindoc Bob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spindoc Bob - what was the license and source of data imported here? commented 2025-12-18 05:50:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 161897448 (Comments: 1) | map editor zzzzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355170258/history has shop = pakoda that was added in this edit shop=pakoda ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstre... commented 2025-12-18 05:18:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 170671719 (Comments: 1) | kavoosi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13081814473/history has shop = taxi that was added in this edit shop=taxi ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreet... commented 2025-12-18 05:17:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 163076055 (Comments: 1) | rdelach (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288402163/history has shop = thrift that was added in this edit shop=thrift ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstree... commented 2025-12-18 05:15:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176056213 (Comments: 2) | Aerond (Discussed changesets: 49) | Oj, måste blivit fel tag när den skapades. Fixat nu, tack för infon. commented 2025-12-18 04:51:54 UTC by Aerond ♦68 |
| 176004668 (Comments: 1) | jdarski (Discussed changesets: 3) | To nie zmienia faktu, że od serwisowej zawrotki jest łącznica prowadząca bezpośrednio na S7 i powinna być motorway_link zgodnie z zasadami mapowania łącznic. commented 2025-12-18 04:47:51 UTC by theDM ♦159 |
| 175783849 (Comments: 2) | jaredjared (Discussed changesets: 2) | you're right. that was my mistake It looked strange so i had assumed it was an error. I will go ahead and fix it. commented 2025-12-18 04:35:59 UTC by jaredjared ♦2 |
| 175606759 (Comments: 2) | jaredjared (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-18 04:33:31 UTC by jaredjared ♦2 |
| 176017635 (Comments: 1) | KuLiG998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-18 04:22:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176001081 (Comments: 1) | plokij (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-18 04:22:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 175998350 (Comments: 1) | JerzyUrban (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175601903 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-12-18 04:22:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176005154 (Comments: 1) | Marcin09 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-18 04:22:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176015387 (Comments: 1) | drmicrosolutions (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-18 04:22:37 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176015134 (Comments: 1) | drmicrosolutions (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-18 04:22:33 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176015084 (Comments: 1) | drmicrosolutions (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-18 04:22:26 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 176011715 (Comments: 1) | pozmieniaczmap (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-12-18 04:22:21 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,005 |
| 152607664 (Comments: 1) | B22789 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11976641352/history has shop = environmental_services that was added in this edit shop=environmental_services ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is a... commented 2025-12-18 04:00:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 126223042 (Comments: 1) | muhammadAbd (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10026882143/history has shop = سوق_الكهربا that was added in this edit shop=سوق_الكهربا ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is any... commented 2025-12-18 03:56:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
 | 48320324 (Comments: 1) | dominique hoavonon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4829693224/history has shop = moto_repair that was added in this edit Is this place repairing cars? Or repairing motorcycles? Or both of them? Maybe one of existing shop values are fitting here and would b... commented 2025-12-18 03:50:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 171246633 (Comments: 4) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 171) | Yeah, I agree that it’s a weird misnomer in this context. Basically all we need is a top-level feature tag to apply to whatever area we tag as access=private. Modeling it as a nature preserve inside a nature preserve seems counterintuitive. Tha... commented 2025-12-18 03:46:29 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦593 |
| 175905455 (Comments: 1) | cnvery (Discussed changesets: 42) | Apakah kantor node/13375216913 ini dapat diverifikasi? Letaknya di Kelenteng Perkumpulan Hwie Tiauw Ka. Is this office node/13375216913 verifiable? it's located in Perkumpulan Hwie Tiauw Ka Temple. commented 2025-12-18 03:32:24 UTC by FajrAl ♦140 |
| 176060859 (Comments: 1) | fondolucy (Discussed changesets: 16) | Why do you remove the drains from the map? You can check the Taiwan Government open data map NLSC Open Data Map for the drain system commented 2025-12-18 02:57:38 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,545 |
| 176073312 (Comments: 1) | samho1234567 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Source: http://pnr.sz.gov.cn/xxgk/gggs/content/post_12553422.html commented 2025-12-18 02:55:26 UTC by samho1234567 ♦28 |
| 157676669 (Comments: 1) | no1lakersfan2007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't just click resolve on errors and issues unless you understand it. Splitting up streams just to hid an error when it is still completely wrong and shouldn't exist in the first place is incorrect: Example: https:... commented 2025-12-18 02:43:29 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,072 |
| 176014106 (Comments: 2) | Rdeipenau (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola Rdeipenau, le envié mensaje por privado y ahora por acá, usted hizo una eliminación masiva de calles y que otros usuarios tuvieron que revertir sus cambios, le vuelvo a decir lo mismo que en el mensaje anterior, antes de bor... commented 2025-12-18 02:29:07 UTC by serock ♦78 |
| 176038341 (Comments: 1) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, so of the footprints you added here represent buildings, but around half do not. cross reference Mapbox in this area using check the shortcuts `?` to se how to toggle imagery in ID. See how I mapeed some of these in https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2025-12-18 02:20:11 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,176 |
| 175960650 (Comments: 1) | pierre_mo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vu que ça a été taguer comme ça sur Grenoble, est-ce que tu pourrais corriger tes autres modifications avec les même tag que sur ce noeud. Soit amenity=bicycle_parking bicycle_parking=floor small_electri... commented 2025-12-18 02:05:39 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 168962553 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Those overclassified roads around this school have been downgraded in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176072651. Those roads don't need to be tagged as unclassified roads. commented 2025-12-18 01:59:26 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176051763 (Comments: 1) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 69) | ale stara droga została usunieta czy tylko zaslepiona dla aut? commented 2025-12-18 01:57:24 UTC by Yog Sot ♦380 |
| 176021185 (Comments: 2) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 70) | ♡❤︎♡ commented 2025-12-18 01:52:40 UTC by Yog Sot ♦380 |
| 175782475 (Comments: 1) | Truck-thin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Truck-thin, I've reverted the demolished railway sections added in this changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176072502 Former rail beds can be mapped in OSM where they are still visible features of the modern landsca... commented 2025-12-18 01:50:53 UTC by ezekielf ♦88 |
| 168962611 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176072478 commented 2025-12-18 01:43:10 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176064399 (Comments: 2) | Mathisle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ist klar – war ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler. Danke für die Korrektur! commented 2025-12-18 01:15:15 UTC by Mathisle ♦1 |
| 175843131 (Comments: 1) | MENSTRU (Discussed changesets: 4) | En plus du tag toilets=yes qu'il faut rajouter, tu peux mettre toilets:access=customers pour indiquer que l'accès est que pour la clientèle et donc sous-entend que les protections aussi. Comme ça pas besoin de de... commented 2025-12-18 01:10:31 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 175843451 (Comments: 1) | MENSTRU (Discussed changesets: 4) | Comme décrit dans le wiki, un tag toilets:menstrual_products nécessite un tag toilets=yes pour déjà indiquer qu'il y a des toilettes à cet endroit. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:toilets:menstrua... commented 2025-12-18 01:04:42 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 168962241 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | I downgraded those unclassified roads around this school to service roads and parking aisles in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176071866. Please elaborate on why you changed valid service roads and driveways around schools to unclassified ro... commented 2025-12-18 00:55:37 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 175899056 (Comments: 1) | MENSTRU (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, ce n'est pas possible de créer un noeud sans tag descriptif général comme amenity=toilets, natural=*, etc... Et généralement les tags descriptifs se suffisent à eux même donc pas bes... commented 2025-12-18 00:54:33 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 175844272 (Comments: 1) | MENSTRU (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Le tag toiles:menstrual_products s'utilise uniquement sur les noeuds amenity=toilets. C'est décrit dans la page wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:toilets:menstrual_products --- ... commented 2025-12-18 00:51:53 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 176026268 (Comments: 3) | A-dg6 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Oké, ik zal de halte toevoegen aan lijn 193. commented 2025-12-18 00:44:52 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,404 |
| 175782875 (Comments: 7) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | Yeah, backward compatibility for software that hasn't been updated in almost 20 years. It's deprecated. commented 2025-12-18 00:42:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,293 |
| 176035033 (Comments: 1) | FEEBLEBEETLE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. The traffic signal there is correct - if you want to add an ALPR, please move it to the phyiscal location and map the direction. Let me know if you need help doing this! Happy mapping commented 2025-12-18 00:26:39 UTC by citrula ♦977 |
| 176063856 (Comments: 1) | Nomira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Ergänzung! Da das hier dein erster Changeset ist, ist die Erklärung wohl, dass du beim ersten Mal das Hochladen vergessen hast. Ein Hinweis für die Zukunft: Am besten sollte man jedes Mal, wenn man neue Daten ... commented 2025-12-18 00:13:26 UTC by kadiwa ♦57 |
| 175872431 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | To answer your question regarding classification here—I wouldn't overthink it. It probably makes more sense to tag a short road leading to a few smallish gated communities as unclassified/residential. The NHS designation is here automatica... commented 2025-12-18 00:06:16 UTC by Joseph R P ♦390 |
| 175817089 (Comments: 2) | johnny67sixseven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19184 commented 2025-12-17 23:58:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,258 |
| 175692751 (Comments: 1) | snake21 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hello, Arlington Boulevard should not be tagged as a motorway. While it is limited-access, through this segment, it has a relatively low speed limit (45 mph), an arterial road-like median, sidewalks, and very tight ramps. The best classification for ... commented 2025-12-17 23:58:27 UTC by Joseph R P ♦390 |
| 176068823 (Comments: 2) | SaelBiritiba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please give more detailed changeset comments, especially when removing so many buildings that still exist on current imagery. Thanks, Clifford Snow, DWG, OpenStreetMap Foundation commented 2025-12-17 23:15:34 UTC by Glassman ♦5,663 |
| 173168186 (Comments: 1) | santasa (Discussed changesets: 9) | This conflicts with the information in Croatian Cadastral Geoportal, which seems to be more complete. Please join discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/granica-hr-bih-bivsa-vojna-baza-aerodrom-zeljava/139411 to resolve this dispu... commented 2025-12-17 22:43:53 UTC by Matija Nalis ♦122 |
| 176069265 (Comments: 1) | Mapping Misfits (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, thanks for the edit. But why did you tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118510963 as a one way only road? commented 2025-12-17 22:37:47 UTC by pwbriggs ♦109 |
| 174384471 (Comments: 1) | themnn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo themnn, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Du hast angeklickt, dass jemand deine Änderungen anschauen soll - das hab ich bei einigen gemacht. Alles gut soweit, danke! Hier hast du bei der Staatsstraße an ein paar Stücke... commented 2025-12-17 22:28:41 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦274 |
| 175780485 (Comments: 1) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Zmiana jest niepoprawna. Według wiki, nawet jeśli ulica ma tylko nazwisko patrona, w OSM dodajemy także imię: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic commented 2025-12-17 22:20:41 UTC by SpinOff ♦348 |
| 175546351 (Comments: 3) | andrzej-pl (Discussed changesets: 21) | No to podmienię na building=school i building:use=public. Większy problem z tą zmianą wynikał z przedstawiania nieistniejącej jednostki jako aktywnej. commented 2025-12-17 22:17:55 UTC by VJMK ♦7 |
| 86937588 (Comments: 4) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 171) | Now down to 333 - thanks! commented 2025-12-17 22:06:53 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,591 |
| 175844917 (Comments: 3) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Użytkownik @uprkos zwrócił Ci uwagę, że Twoja zmiana jest niepoprawna, podając odnośnik do dokumentacji. Dlaczego nie przywróciłeś poprawnego stanu? commented 2025-12-17 22:04:58 UTC by SpinOff ♦348 |
| 176068108 (Comments: 1) | DWebb1980 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This camera has already been reported and it shows up on another map version. It faces north on Frederica Road and is a pole mounted Flock camera. commented 2025-12-17 21:36:51 UTC by DWebb1980 ♦2 |
| 176068166 (Comments: 1) | DWebb1980 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Location is approximate. Could not get it exact on the map. It’s faces South on Frederica Road and is a pole mounted Flock camera. commented 2025-12-17 21:34:15 UTC by DWebb1980 ♦2 |
| 175924310 (Comments: 3) | Mex (Discussed changesets: 14) | Yeah, quite a few go through buildings. I should be back there sometime next week, and will try to get those added then. commented 2025-12-17 21:19:24 UTC by decmap ♦3 |
| 175978509 (Comments: 1) | Aarslev (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hej Aarslev Jeg kan se at du konsekvent sletter veje, der tilføjes omkring Aarslevgaard. I den seneste tid har du nok oplevet en del ekstra aktivitet med vejene, og det kommer sig af, at der i øjeblikket er iværksat en [kam... commented 2025-12-17 21:17:47 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦27 |
| 176043300 (Comments: 1) | kdziedzic (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-17 21:15:02 UTC by stasiu512 ♦216 |
| 176026405 (Comments: 1) | ko25 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, auch diese Bearbeitung habe ich mir angeschaut. Ich vermute, es handelt sich um eine Saugstelle, an der per Saugleitung und Saugkorb Wasser entnommen wird? Dann wäre das emergency=suction_point water_source=pond ... commented 2025-12-17 21:13:58 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 176064368 (Comments: 2) | BGHiker (Discussed changesets: 1) | The specific area edited is within the Fountain Hills McDowell Mountain Preserve. No physical address unless you use the trailhead address. commented 2025-12-17 21:10:44 UTC by BGHiker ♦1 |
| 176006916 (Comments: 2) | zoeiuga (Discussed changesets: 4) | J'ai revert la modification --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176006916 commented 2025-12-17 21:10:14 UTC by Futur3r ♦239 |
| 157814855 (Comments: 2) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Cześć, nie wiem czy są określone zasady co do mapowania tego, moim zdaniem wiele z tych stopów faktycznie w godzinach nocnych ma znaczenie, nie mówiąc już o sytuacji uszkodzenia sygnalizacji. commented 2025-12-17 21:09:58 UTC by stasiu512 ♦216 |
| 176026074 (Comments: 1) | ko25 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe keine Anmerkung, das sieht gut aus. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen. Viele ... commented 2025-12-17 21:09:50 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,213 |
| 171800309 (Comments: 5) | Anazaar (Discussed changesets: 31) | Jedna droga jest dobrze zrobiona, to po co zmieniałeś to kilka razy. Jakim to trzeba być ancymonem, by to robić commented 2025-12-17 21:03:58 UTC by DariaDX ♦3 |
| 176000512 (Comments: 1) | nimat223322 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello nimat223322 and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I'm a bit puzzled by this edit - you've said that this isn't a building any more yet has 3 levels?. Also I don't understand why your comment above is "Ordnance Sur... commented 2025-12-17 20:59:36 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,591 |
| 176036679 (Comments: 1) | Pucciotrex30 (Discussed changesets: 50) | La rotatoria da te mappata non è stata inaugurata ieri ma nel 2024. L'articolo si riferisce a un altro incrocio lungo la SS81, oltre 10 km più a sud: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/42.612985/13.761642 commented 2025-12-17 20:58:42 UTC by totera ♦314 |
| 167712705 (Comments: 4) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hallo, akino_germany! Dich zu grüßen halte ich für höflich, denn ich schätze Deine Beiträge zur Datenbank sehr. Bis jetzt sind wir uns ja auch immer noch einig geworden. Und doch: Nein, ICH ändere da ... commented 2025-12-17 20:45:52 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦139 |
| 176066836 (Comments: 1) | Ugsea (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравствуйте, спасибо за ваше редактирование! Пожалуйста, в будущем уделяйте время написанию корректных комментариев к наборам измен... commented 2025-12-17 20:45:18 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦46 |
| 175252013 (Comments: 2) | thautal (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hei, kiitos muistutuksesta! Jossain vaiheessa mennyt ilmeisesti sekaisin mielessäni ja tottumuksesta vaan jatkanut iloisesti väärällä tagilla commented 2025-12-17 20:42:22 UTC by thautal ♦49 |
| 133834982 (Comments: 3) | Đuro Jiří (Discussed changesets: 88) | Got it thank you ! commented 2025-12-17 20:36:32 UTC by K12230LF ♦49 |
| 176003410 (Comments: 2) | Webpapst (Discussed changesets: 6) | Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176045158 commented 2025-12-17 20:26:55 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176013479 (Comments: 2) | netixgr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176058904 commented 2025-12-17 20:25:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176018217 (Comments: 2) | stygio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176018326 commented 2025-12-17 20:24:17 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176063021 (Comments: 1) | ELAAX IT-Service (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176063021 commented 2025-12-17 20:04:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,749 |
| 176019705 (Comments: 3) | Gspthebest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Should be corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176065568 Thanks, SenteInterdite commented 2025-12-17 20:02:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176063443 (Comments: 1) | amplejev1987 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Šitos aikštelės NĖRA pažymėtos kelio ženklu „P“, tai jos neturėtų būti žymimos kaip amenity=parking. commented 2025-12-17 20:01:36 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,010 |
| 174258269 (Comments: 1) | Zol87 (Discussed changesets: 67) | These points were not subway entrances. commented 2025-12-17 20:01:23 UTC by nickvet419 ♦98 |
| 176053993 (Comments: 1) | Mitalos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, acaba bu projenin dokümanları var mıdır? Metro İstanbul, İBB veya başka bir kaynakta böyle bir projeye rastlayamadım. commented 2025-12-17 19:58:09 UTC by marmara_editor ♦11 |
| 175220202 (Comments: 7) | Archer470 (Discussed changesets: 8) | No one has provided any proof otherwise. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/harrassment-from-data-working-group-moderators-and-yamatoshiya/139433 commented 2025-12-17 19:45:05 UTC by Archer470 ♦2 |
| 176052268 (Comments: 1) | Your local degoogler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-17 19:41:23 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176036948 (Comments: 1) | maksimileeuhn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-17 19:39:07 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176059269 (Comments: 1) | Advanced Cleaning Service (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-17 19:37:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176053364 (Comments: 1) | Everybitfit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-17 19:37:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176051985 (Comments: 1) | Dogtopia of Lake St Louis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-17 19:37:38 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176048510 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS at Rochester (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-17 19:37:29 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176044353 (Comments: 1) | primestoragetoronto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-17 19:37:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176041461 (Comments: 1) | boldmovingandstorage (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-17 19:37:14 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176037151 (Comments: 1) | primestorageburnaby (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-17 19:36:59 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 145881633 (Comments: 1) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 86) | Heb net ontdekt dat postcode van Loncin, 4431 is, en niet 4430 (Ans). Postcode relatie stond al enkele jaren fout: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145881633 Aangepast in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176064805 commented 2025-12-17 19:33:18 UTC by abs8_josm ♦6 |
| 176024198 (Comments: 1) | A-dg6 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Alle 6 de routerelaties hebben nu een foutmelding. De editor iD waar je mee werkt kan niet omgaan met het wijzigen van routerelaties. De nieuwe halte wordt achter aan de route vast geplakt en staat dan niet op de juiste plaats in de route. A... commented 2025-12-17 19:32:54 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,404 |
| 174487616 (Comments: 4) | AdrenoBear (Discussed changesets: 1) | No worries, I know how that goes. Big part of why my OSM and Wikipedia contributions end up being sporadic as well. Would you like to collaborate on mapping these out? This is getting a little out of scope of the changeset discussion but feel free to... commented 2025-12-17 19:23:05 UTC by Kinsio ♦26 |
| 176057458 (Comments: 1) | RoseArrow (Discussed changesets: 4) | Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite. commented 2025-12-17 19:16:05 UTC by RoseArrow ♦5 |
| 176047287 (Comments: 1) | Trachukd (Discussed changesets: 1) | не надо дубли делать, вы уже нанесли эту "пекарнюдонербистро" один раз commented 2025-12-17 19:06:38 UTC by literan ♦6,920 |
| X | 176002709 (Comments: 1) | MaprailMike (Discussed changesets: 1) | how does this changeset span 3 continents commented 2025-12-17 18:56:29 UTC by dmjab13 ♦63 |
| 166545579 (Comments: 2) | ryunezm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, that was a mistake. I just fixed. Thanks for noticing 🤙 commented 2025-12-17 18:48:12 UTC by ryunezm ♦1 |
| 176022523 (Comments: 1) | jhu-avenidas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! This is a database used by maps around the world. If you need to test something, please use the development server: https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org . The tags on OSM objects all mean things that the community has a... commented 2025-12-17 18:47:10 UTC by impiaaa ♦450 |
| 176004716 (Comments: 1) | Aianov (Discussed changesets: 22) | Зачем вы удалили все данные и заммапили их заново? commented 2025-12-17 18:46:14 UTC by Ruslan Fatih ♦45 |
| 176000462 (Comments: 1) | Aianov (Discussed changesets: 22) | Зачем вы удалили все данные и заммапили их заново? commented 2025-12-17 18:46:03 UTC by Ruslan Fatih ♦45 |
| 175977229 (Comments: 1) | Aianov (Discussed changesets: 22) | Зачем вы удалили все данные и заммапили их заново? commented 2025-12-17 18:45:41 UTC by Ruslan Fatih ♦45 |
| 176059465 (Comments: 1) | Pr166 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Feedback. Lijkt me prima zo. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-17 18:41:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176025652 (Comments: 2) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thanks for your comment. Think I have decoupled all of them now, and be more aware for future edits commented 2025-12-17 18:35:59 UTC by kOSMofant ♦10 |
| 175749035 (Comments: 1) | osm19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there. Please, please stop arbitrarily grouping landuse areas. This serves no purpose and it makes the areas impossible to work with. On top of that the slim sections around greenfields are plainly wrong. I'm also sending you this mes... commented 2025-12-17 18:32:53 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦647 |
| 175779272 (Comments: 1) | Hartz Beltza (Discussed changesets: 26) | Mesedez, kale bati izena aldatzen diozun BETI, gogoratu hari lotutako helbideak ere aldatzea (addr:street) commented 2025-12-17 18:06:49 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦242 |
| 163095054 (Comments: 2) | lankapuhelin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hmm openstreetmapin periaatehan on, että kartoitetaan juttuja, mitä on oikeasti olemassa maastossa. Tämä autokoulun lähtöpaikka -tyyppinen merkki ei välttämättä sellainen ole? commented 2025-12-17 18:06:39 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦74 |
| 176059727 (Comments: 3) | Hallie Masseba (Discussed changesets: 7) | Top! En er is nog een onderscheid. Path routeert ook voor fietsers en footway niet. Veel doorsteken in wijken zijn vaak path.. want ook bedoeld voor fietsers. Mapse commented 2025-12-17 18:03:46 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175596272 (Comments: 1) | Серый Еж (Discussed changesets: 2) | А куда у вас уплыли дома по адресу Гаражный проезд 23 к1 и 23 к2? commented 2025-12-17 17:57:45 UTC by Nine-tailed ♦20 |
| 175959329 (Comments: 5) | cantas (Discussed changesets: 1) | @property0029 "bazı yerlerin adı "İTÜ" ile başlarken bazılarınınki başlamıyor. Tamamen merakımdan soruyorum, neden böyle ve acaba openstreetmap'te de o hâliyle olsa daha mı mantıklı olur? Belki isimler... commented 2025-12-17 17:50:37 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦191 |
| 175990385 (Comments: 2) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 963) | Une erreur merci commented 2025-12-17 17:36:03 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦243 |
 | 176050594 (Comments: 2) | nlrodekruis5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted the edit in the Netherlands commented 2025-12-17 17:32:27 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦34 |
| 176057299 (Comments: 1) | KenelmPJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-17 17:21:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176047948 (Comments: 2) | Aianov (Discussed changesets: 22) | Если вы будете удалять данные и создавать точно такие же от своего имени я буду присылать репорты на вандализм commented 2025-12-17 17:20:27 UTC by Ruslan Fatih ♦45 |
| 175930465 (Comments: 3) | property0029 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merhaba. Yorumumun yanlış anlaşıldığını düşünüyorum. İstenmeyen şey "bir okulun Milli E.B. yerine Millî E.B. tarafından işletilmesi" değil. İstenmeyen şey, hatalı nesnelerin tek tek kontrol edilmeden, o... commented 2025-12-17 17:17:19 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦191 |
| 139202947 (Comments: 2) | oz1lln (Discussed changesets: 13) | God gammeldavs typo ;-) God jul commented 2025-12-17 17:16:26 UTC by oz1lln ♦3 |
 | 175890286 (Comments: 1) | Ctrl+shiftF5 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hola Ctrl+shiftF5. La etiqueta de `highway=proposed` no puede ser utilizada aleatoriamente. En realidad no suministra a nadie de algún dato útil. Tanto así que en la página que se refiere a esa etiqueta [highway=propose... commented 2025-12-17 17:15:00 UTC by JAAS ♦89 |
| 176058244 (Comments: 6) | Pr166 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Je zou kunnen overstappen naar de betere editor JOSM.. voordat je te veel went aan editor iD. Die heeft een goede validator en waarschuwt al bij een verkeerde upload. Hij lijkt heel ingewikkeld, maar dat valt op den duur wel mee. Ik ... commented 2025-12-17 17:10:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 174462275 (Comments: 2) | elmira_lyft (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, kitto33, Thank you for pointing that out! That is a very helpful clarification, and we really appreciate you taking the initiative to make those specific corrections based on your local knowledge. It definitely helps ensure the map is as a... commented 2025-12-17 16:47:25 UTC by elmira_lyft ♦3 |
| 173880129 (Comments: 7) | elmira_lyft (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, kitto33, Thank you for your patience while we worked on these updates. We have now implemented the changes based on your suggestions to ensure full accuracy across all highways. The tags have been updated in the following changeset... commented 2025-12-17 16:46:26 UTC by elmira_lyft ♦3 |
| 160364205 (Comments: 1) | Armando Hasanbelliu (Discussed changesets: 24) | errato rimosso attraversamento commented 2025-12-17 16:42:07 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦136 |
| 176039401 (Comments: 10) | Pr166 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hoi eggie, brug staat er. heb het water verlengd, maar eigenlijk zouden de twee waterstukken prima samengevoegd kunnen worden (idem met een enkele bosgebieden). Dat lukt nu echter niet. commented 2025-12-17 16:28:05 UTC by Pr166 ♦7 |
| 176035952 (Comments: 1) | Bayu Nabiil (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping here. A remark.Please do not include the shadow into a mapping. Best regards commented 2025-12-17 16:19:51 UTC by Frans S ♦10,213 |
| 159456128 (Comments: 3) | Region Westlausitz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ok, danke für Info. Für mich klingt es anhand der Doku eher nach access=private, aber ich meinetwegen... "Kein Zugang für die breite Öffentlichkeit, Benutzung nach individueller Erlaubnis. Oft auf Werksgeländen...&... commented 2025-12-17 16:06:58 UTC by sembelst134 ♦8 |
| 173291613 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | This borough/suburb relation that you broke in this changeset has been fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174636140. Would you care to explain what motivated this change? commented 2025-12-17 16:06:41 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176036927 (Comments: 2) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks voor je hulp! :) commented 2025-12-17 16:01:50 UTC by Taurus3 ♦10 |
| 176043404 (Comments: 2) | voschix (Discussed changesets: 69) | Errore mio - volevo solo cambiare da cycleway a footway, ma ho tolto tutto. Questa stretta striscia di asfalto è presente sul lato est di Via San Pio X fra le due rotonde, é utilizzabile in bici, ma non è una cycleway. Farò... commented 2025-12-17 15:52:38 UTC by voschix ♦191 |
| 175131545 (Comments: 1) | risker516 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I have started a thread in the forum for discussion on road classification in southern Ontario https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/southern-ontario-road-classification-ongoing-thread/139281 - we're starting to discuss what the crite... commented 2025-12-17 15:51:08 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦347 |
| 175357071 (Comments: 1) | porcelainkatana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Generally the usual way of tagging GO stations is that we have a node (or an area) representing the entire station, with station metadata like codes (e.g. ref:go_transit=LA), and then the station/ticket building can be separate and tagg... commented 2025-12-17 15:39:53 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦347 |
| 174652113 (Comments: 4) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | This incorrect map edit has been fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174702103. Please do not change valid suburb boundaries into roads. This is not acceptable on OSM, and it damages the map. commented 2025-12-17 15:37:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 175302263 (Comments: 2) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 371) | Hoi Kees.. Vast wel. Ik heb hier dacht ik alleen een startende mapper geholpen. Ik heb geen lokale kennis hier. Een bedrijf dat was verhuisd. Up to you! Groet.. eggie Ligt me niet helemaal meer bij. commented 2025-12-17 15:33:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 162393354 (Comments: 4) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176055918 commented 2025-12-17 15:31:42 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 175742533 (Comments: 1) | TMomä (Discussed changesets: 5) | Korjattu alueiden keskinäistä topologiaa. Tälle polulle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990506793 pitäisi vielä tehdä päivitys. Lienee nykyään jotain muuta kuin polku, eihän muuten tuonne pysäk... commented 2025-12-17 15:21:46 UTC by houtari ♦54 |
| 176052007 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the source for the addition of this apartment building? Aerial imagery of this location shows no apartment building here. Did this apartment building recently get built here? commented 2025-12-17 15:20:05 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176055037 (Comments: 2) | Pr166 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176055037 horse=no hoeft ook niet op een wandelpad. Allemaal default. commented 2025-12-17 15:16:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176045628 (Comments: 3) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | done commented 2025-12-17 15:14:08 UTC by chnuessli ♦121 |
| 176045223 (Comments: 2) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | I deleted defibrillator:location as well because that was not the correct location. commented 2025-12-17 15:10:23 UTC by chnuessli ♦121 |
| 175516328 (Comments: 2) | property0029 (Discussed changesets: 4) | > gereksiz multipoligon oluşturduğunuzun farkında mısınız? Farkında değilim? dönüştürdüğünüz otopark (11285145) 5 sene önce oluşturulmuş ve siz dönüştürene kadar v1'... commented 2025-12-17 15:09:45 UTC by property0029 ♦6 |
| 176049208 (Comments: 2) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | access=yes seems legit during opening_hours. access is a little bit of a discussion in combination with AED. See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/access-no-auf-defibrillatoren-in-der-schweiz/118013 commented 2025-12-17 15:08:11 UTC by chnuessli ♦121 |
| 176008168 (Comments: 2) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 10) | Jakieś domy w Trzciance https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459060422 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459060420 commented 2025-12-17 15:03:20 UTC by VJMK ♦7 |
 | 174856891 (Comments: 2) | mohamedd_ahmed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Alsalehq80, Thank you for your comment. The road was marked as under construction based on the latest Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-11-28. If you have more up-to-date or local information confirming that the road is fully o... commented 2025-12-17 15:00:39 UTC by mohamedd_ahmed ♦3 |
| 175557983 (Comments: 1) | AustinAkaHadiRender (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi AustinAkaHadiRender, Thanks for your contributions! I wanted to kindly suggest a couple of best practices that help make edits easier for the whole community to understand and review: • Please try to keep the changeset size reasonable ... commented 2025-12-17 14:56:10 UTC by salma_ayman ♦20 |
| 175850938 (Comments: 1) | Marticorena ProLAS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, c'est plutôt l'attribut que le logo :) est-ce qu'il utilise tout le batiment ? bonne carto Marticorena commented 2025-12-17 14:47:34 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,288 |
| 176045567 (Comments: 1) | julessgds (Discussed changesets: 9) | Salut, les adresses ne sont pas nécessaires, sauf cas très particulier. à plus commented 2025-12-17 14:44:13 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,288 |
| 176024985 (Comments: 3) | pudoeco (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok, no hay problema. Saludos commented 2025-12-17 14:38:35 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 175010705 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! UK-USA (Discussed changesets: 35) | Source is also Bing too. commented 2025-12-17 14:25:04 UTC by ika-chan! ♦313 |
| 176052749 (Comments: 1) | Luzandro (Discussed changesets: 83) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5094793 commented 2025-12-17 14:15:53 UTC by Luzandro ♦962 |
| 175932213 (Comments: 1) | unbiased_outcome (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi unbiased_outcome, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458550296 link=* isn't a documented value, maybe you could use source=* in such cases. Also the highway name was correct before, as Italian guidelines: https://wiki.ope... commented 2025-12-17 14:11:32 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,806 |
| 176048791 (Comments: 1) | Fonsrae (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Fonsrae.. Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Mvg eggie commented 2025-12-17 14:03:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176049510 (Comments: 1) | Berenboot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Berenboot.. Die prijs varieert toch doorlopend. Dit lijkt me weinig zinvol al is het goed bedoeld. Mvg eggie commented 2025-12-17 14:01:43 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175730459 (Comments: 2) | El Chilly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I have no memory of making this edit, nor any reason I would have needed to. I cannot find way to undo. My apologies. Please advise and thank you. commented 2025-12-17 13:55:34 UTC by El Chilly ♦1 |
| 175694813 (Comments: 6) | ZioDragon (Discussed changesets: 35) | Nói chung tôi chỉ muốn góp ý với bạn là nên đổi trạng thái sang hoàn thiện nếu nó thực sự hoàn thiện rồi, còn vẫn đang trong tình trạng x&... commented 2025-12-17 13:52:19 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦28 |
| 176050369 (Comments: 2) | bxl-forever_repair (Discussed changesets: 21) | You are welcome. … Hint: Commenting on someone’s edit marks the changeset as faulty. Mappers with a lot of changeset comments are seen as bad mappers. By commenting here above you’ve in fact… lowered my rep... commented 2025-12-17 13:49:31 UTC by bxl-forever_repair ♦52 |
| 176041380 (Comments: 1) | Jimmy Arnouts (Discussed changesets: 1) | * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property commented 2025-12-17 13:44:24 UTC by Jakka ♦1,831 |
 | 95189578 (Comments: 1) | Vivero La Amistad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8189283221/history has shop = Vivero that was added in this edit shop=Vivero ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstr... commented 2025-12-17 13:23:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 170274912 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 132) | The problem with that is machines are stupid about expanding abbreviations, and that doesn't change with the key. That's the chief concern with name tags. commented 2025-12-17 13:16:00 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,293 |
| 176029277 (Comments: 5) | Rukkhadevata (Discussed changesets: 22) | 已修复 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13367011/history/9 commented 2025-12-17 13:05:58 UTC by Rukkhadevata ♦37 |
| 168161517 (Comments: 2) | Honalock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I have redacted all the personal names you have added to the map. As stated above, personal information does not belong on our map. Best regards, Taya Snijder, On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group commented 2025-12-17 13:05:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176025811 (Comments: 1) | Cris Moreno Silva (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. ¿Qué hay ahí realmente? porque no se ve un parque propiamente tal. gracias --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176025811 commented 2025-12-17 13:03:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 176046560 (Comments: 1) | Tributos Matureia Paraíba (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá, para linhas de energia com tensões 220/380V ou 13800 kv use "minor_line" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176046560 commented 2025-12-17 12:54:50 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,193 |
| 175927218 (Comments: 1) | Shekhar Prasad Bhatt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Press Q to square the building commented 2025-12-17 12:53:30 UTC by FajrAl ♦140 |
| 176013175 (Comments: 1) | AnteŽunić (Discussed changesets: 26) | Some tags that were in conflict with posted signs have been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176049241 commented 2025-12-17 12:51:06 UTC by AnteŽunić ♦10 |
| 176043615 (Comments: 1) | Mr bafo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, rigtig meget af det som bliver tilføjet OSM sker på baggrund af luftfotos, set fra den vinkel er der her en sti/vej som ikke er tegnet. Det havde været bedre at tagge stien som privat/fjernet. Ved at slette den kan den blive t... commented 2025-12-17 12:43:18 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,740 |
| 175823723 (Comments: 1) | Marcelm005 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4849766973 to be clockwise rather than anticlockwise commented 2025-12-17 12:36:13 UTC by ntzm ♦44 |
| 175974316 (Comments: 4) | RafaelCHILE (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Probablemente hay varios videos en Youtube, pero también hay una wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/). Pero puede ser un poco agobiante al principio. Lo que te recomendamos es que entres al chat de Telegram de la comunidad chilena de ... commented 2025-12-17 12:34:38 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,664 |
| 176009165 (Comments: 2) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 963) | Merci. J'oublie souvent le bon format, mais grâce à Osmose, je corrige toujours sauf si un autre contributeur l'a fait avant moi J'ai aussi eu beaucoup de difficulté pour le parking avec 30 minutes gratuites... commented 2025-12-17 12:26:58 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦243 |
| 176000263 (Comments: 1) | SnickersXD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, reminder that #hotosm-project-37395 is for building mapping only. Thanks! commented 2025-12-17 12:23:20 UTC by FajrAl ♦140 |
| 171760933 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi! How a parking https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6680868209 can be a "no parking area"? commented 2025-12-17 12:20:26 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 171760980 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi! Are there really two bakeries that close to one another or is this just a duplicate? commented 2025-12-17 12:18:47 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 175983184 (Comments: 1) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 184) | Lebih baik batas administrasi dibuatkan geometri baru; tidak menggunakan/menumpang geometri jalan, selokan, atau air sungai. commented 2025-12-17 12:16:31 UTC by FajrAl ♦140 |
| 176041504 (Comments: 2) | RKhabib (Discussed changesets: 7) | sorry I forgot to do it, thank you commented 2025-12-17 12:15:49 UTC by RKhabib ♦3 |
| 176047212 (Comments: 1) | bkleipool (Discussed changesets: 8) | *RWY06 commented 2025-12-17 12:14:00 UTC by bkleipool ♦6 |
| 176047665 (Comments: 1) | bkleipool (Discussed changesets: 8) | *RWY24 commented 2025-12-17 12:13:47 UTC by bkleipool ♦6 |
| 176047638 (Comments: 1) | AnteŽunić (Discussed changesets: 26) | According source:hgv tag was added to changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176006872 commented 2025-12-17 12:11:06 UTC by AnteŽunić ♦10 |
| 175959572 (Comments: 4) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | Please see: This entry seems reasonable to me. We take the focus on defis, not the world world around it, a missing container wouldn't be in our focus and we trust local osm communities/mappers to improve the map as well. The normal app/website ... commented 2025-12-17 12:08:10 UTC by chnuessli ♦121 |
| 176033359 (Comments: 4) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | This entry seems reasonable to me. We take the focus on defis, not the world world around it, a missing container wouldn't be in our focus and we trust local osm communities/mappers to improve the map as well. The normal app/website user isn... commented 2025-12-17 12:07:01 UTC by chnuessli ♦121 |
| 176047347 (Comments: 1) | AnteŽunić (Discussed changesets: 26) | According source:hgv tags were added o changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176005266 commented 2025-12-17 12:07:01 UTC by AnteŽunić ♦10 |
| 163921159 (Comments: 1) | TedIsAwesome (Discussed changesets: 16) | И зачем вы делаете отношения из одного участника и даже не убираете теги с линий, которые включили в отношнение? commented 2025-12-17 12:01:08 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,241 |
| 175594504 (Comments: 5) | ShsbsbxnxjU (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nice, vielen Dank! commented 2025-12-17 12:01:07 UTC by ShsbsbxnxjU ♦1 |
| 176031104 (Comments: 1) | dioastya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kalau lahan, tidak perlu tag building=* commented 2025-12-17 12:00:06 UTC by FajrAl ♦140 |
| 171808710 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi! Why did you remove the address from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4686460792 , but didn't move it on any of the of the buildings, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548881944 ? commented 2025-12-17 11:56:36 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 171808897 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi! Be careful with such changes. Previous person was not correct to place the kindergarten tags on the node of the road, but you've moved that node in such a way, that the road was colliding with the building. The correct approach would be to m... commented 2025-12-17 11:53:22 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 176045589 (Comments: 3) | dieudonneblijd39393 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Wellicht beter bij het HOT maps project blijven. Realiseer je dat al je wijzigingen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart komen.... commented 2025-12-17 11:48:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 153451588 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 319) | Dobra, wywaliłem to, bo tam lanes=2 było już dane, więc pewnie ktoś zapomniał usunąć turn:lanes. Możesz sprawdzić po mnie ale powinno być git commented 2025-12-17 11:45:38 UTC by IreuN ♦80 |
| 176045959 (Comments: 1) | spiregrain (Discussed changesets: 51) | actually, not from survey, from NLS - OS 1:1,250/1:2,500 National Grid maps, 1947-1963 commented 2025-12-17 11:31:26 UTC by spiregrain ♦221 |
| 176013618 (Comments: 1) | tangentphy (Discussed changesets: 1) | This one is debatable, as proper names for hangars would be "Hanger 12" etc. The "Former" on the sign also suggests it's a descriptive label, ie it can be "Old Royal Air Force Hangar" and "舊皇家空軍飛機... commented 2025-12-17 11:29:35 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,688 |
| 176044163 (Comments: 3) | KrlnNldr (Discussed changesets: 1) | typo Op de luchtfoto is... commented 2025-12-17 11:24:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 168163139 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi! You've changed the name:en of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5513652915#map=19/34.972886/139.100782 to just "S". If you'll fix it, just write the name of the sculpture, there's no need for neither word "sculpture... commented 2025-12-17 11:20:51 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 176012318 (Comments: 3) | HJGroenVRFR (Discussed changesets: 38) | klopt helemaal was ik even te snel met aanpassen van de weg naar toegangsweg dan neemt die alles niet over pas het aan commented 2025-12-17 11:20:42 UTC by HJGroenVRFR ♦24 |
| 176043187 (Comments: 2) | Abroekhu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Het stukje 'fietspad' heb ik weer aangepast naar G11. Het zal anders niet routeren hier. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-17 11:15:40 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 147361551 (Comments: 2) | Denyve (Discussed changesets: 6) | no answer, no proof that there are "autoweg" signs or signs that would disallow bikes. From my own experience, there are none. So i reverted. commented 2025-12-17 11:15:32 UTC by Bear-in-a-box ♦56 |
| 175822280 (Comments: 1) | Oxeelix (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-17 11:13:18 UTC by aigne ♦1 |
| 143813059 (Comments: 6) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 86) | Are the signs in place? please send a confirmation picture. until then, please do no change the reality on the ground commented 2025-12-17 11:11:19 UTC by Bear-in-a-box ♦56 |
| 172040172 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi! You didn't add name:en here commented 2025-12-17 11:08:32 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 151147410 (Comments: 2) | AndreaDp271 (Discussed changesets: 7) | io ho usato il preset automatico di iD per "accesso per i veicoli di soccorso/emergenza" c'è anche la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access commented 2025-12-17 11:04:53 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦136 |
| 172050482 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi! You didn't add name:en, just moved the point a couple of meters commented 2025-12-17 11:04:35 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 176040010 (Comments: 1) | Amine SOUINIDA (Discussed changesets: 8) | Merci de ne pas utiliser un titres erroné comme مدرسة ابتدائية alors que tu modifies une rue et non pas une école. Merci également de ne pas nommer les rues en majuscules RUE 12 mais plutôt Rue 12. commented 2025-12-17 11:02:08 UTC by ilias_ ♦403 |
| 176040312 (Comments: 1) | Amine SOUINIDA (Discussed changesets: 8) | Merci d’utiliser le format +212 et d’utiliser phone au lieu de contact:phone. Merci également de répondre aux commentaires et aux messages. commented 2025-12-17 11:01:07 UTC by ilias_ ♦403 |
| 175969737 (Comments: 4) | emergency99 (Discussed changesets: 111) | Der Name ist eh nur Hilfe für Mapper (und ob über oder via in einer Klammer steht, es wird schon jeder der es braucht wissen was das heißt. Und diese Info ist auch im via Tag! Wenn dieses Tool oder ein es verwendender Mapper etwas aus... commented 2025-12-17 11:00:35 UTC by emergency99 ♦293 |
| 176020063 (Comments: 2) | Travel-t (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alles klar, ich wusste nicht dass sich dies auf den Stolperstein bezog commented 2025-12-17 10:48:27 UTC by Travel-t ♦1 |
| 176017403 (Comments: 8) | voschix (Discussed changesets: 69) | "way/1272431845: I added bicycle=permissive as it is wide enough for bicyles, and is a safer option for cyclists. It's also in continuation from a signed segregetated foot-cycle-way to the West" I understand your choice, but I d... commented 2025-12-17 10:38:45 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦136 |
| 156504239 (Comments: 1) | EinEngener (Discussed changesets: 132) | Am Spielplatz Sieglanger sind 1. area=yes, piste:type=sled 2. piste:type=sled 3. playgroun=sledding getaggt; für den Hügel würde IMHO 3. genügen und 1. & 2. könnten weg commented 2025-12-17 10:29:07 UTC by fs_LT ♦112 |
| 170597965 (Comments: 1) | OSM-Kreis-Viersen9 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Schade, daß ich von mir nach Luftbildern (NRW iDOP) gezeichneten Gebäude einfach löscht. Es zeigt Baufortschritt beim IST-Stand commented 2025-12-17 10:14:25 UTC by Znaika ♦130 |
| 176035255 (Comments: 1) | luky89 (Discussed changesets: 5) | zdar, podla mna to bolo spravene dobre, mal si len skratit plot, zbytocne si to skomplikoval s polygonom a teraz to dobre nie je..ostatne zmeny sa zdaju ok commented 2025-12-17 10:13:13 UTC by Klerik7 ♦470 |
| 176003266 (Comments: 1) | rashomon (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola Rashomon, según el Catálogo Oficial de Carreteras, el tramo que has incorporado a la relación de Carretera no pertenece a la A-11, sino a la N-122. Me parece que esto es adelantarse a los acontecimientos de lo que en un fut... commented 2025-12-17 10:12:34 UTC by MarinoBM ♦118 |
| 175166346 (Comments: 5) | Majid19822025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your reply. It already has been changed. commented 2025-12-17 10:10:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 51139366 (Comments: 2) | abbst (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133035284 commented 2025-12-17 10:06:49 UTC by berndw ♦636 |
| 176021561 (Comments: 3) | MarinoBM (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello gscholz I'm still working on updating the trails in this area. The resolved:crossings in this edition weren't enough. resolved:crossing_ways:highway-waterway=36 resolved:crossing_ways:railway-waterway=2 warnings:crossing_w... commented 2025-12-17 09:57:21 UTC by MarinoBM ♦118 |
| 170566896 (Comments: 2) | FliWaTüt (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133035284 commented 2025-12-17 09:50:02 UTC by berndw ♦636 |
| 175819821 (Comments: 3) | property0029 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Selamlar, teşekkürler açıklama için. Destek ve fikir alışverişi için eğer üye değilsen iletişim kanallarına bekleriz :) commented 2025-12-17 09:49:29 UTC by unen ♦23 |
| 117050283 (Comments: 2) | mkesko86 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133035284 commented 2025-12-17 09:49:24 UTC by berndw ♦636 |
| 133035284 (Comments: 3) | CaptainCarte (Discussed changesets: 40) | Eventuell wäre eine Diskussion im OSM-Forum dazu sinnvoller als in einzelnen alten Changesets commented 2025-12-17 09:48:46 UTC by berndw ♦636 |
| 175744596 (Comments: 1) | silverbullet (Discussed changesets: 8) | Lies bitte die Nachricht die ich dir geschickt habe. Hier ist auf beiden Seiten der Straße(n) jeweils nur eine Baumreihe in der Realität und nicht zwei. commented 2025-12-17 09:36:55 UTC by RandomThighsEnjoyer ♦6 |
| 175113286 (Comments: 2) | Batik27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour K122230LF Merci pour votre retour. Non ce n'était pas voulu. Je suis encore débutante sur Openstreet maps L'esplanade des anciens, qui est une placette en dessous de la chapelle de Notre Dame du Reun (erreur ... commented 2025-12-17 09:35:29 UTC by Batik27 ♦1 |
| 175837764 (Comments: 2) | Johann200104 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for pointing that out. I will bear it in mind in future. commented 2025-12-17 09:30:40 UTC by Johann200104 ♦2 |
| 176039867 (Comments: 1) | timstreetmap (Discussed changesets: 5) | source ist falsch, sorry commented 2025-12-17 09:19:38 UTC by timstreetmap ♦5 |
| 175501870 (Comments: 2) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi justinsenemy, My name is Shubham and I’m Ravinder’s teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for sharing your insights. Regarding my edits, they were made based on older aerial imagery, and at the time I di... commented 2025-12-17 09:14:25 UTC by subham_lyft ♦4 |
| 176039094 (Comments: 1) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag Gijsbert, Scherp gezien. Ik heb de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-17 09:07:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 175837001 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi Baloo Uriza, Thank you very much for your valuable insights. We don't have detailed backgrounds to accurately map the waterways and other underlying systems. That's why we avoid changing the geometry of such ways and instead focus ... commented 2025-12-17 09:03:07 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦11 |
| 176021068 (Comments: 1) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | The location description for such a large area is very sparse. It would be highly desirable to find specific information about the AED's installation location. Best regards commented 2025-12-17 08:50:11 UTC by the_third_man ♦14 |
| 172092452 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | 👋 Do you know if those two camp sites are different? If not it's worth deleting one of them commented 2025-12-17 08:43:37 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 175367743 (Comments: 1) | Chuckton (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please just specify the surface of the path e.g. surface=sand, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface commented 2025-12-17 08:42:54 UTC by cuzi ♦140 |
| 172092929 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | 👋 You didn't change the name:en here commented 2025-12-17 08:42:27 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 175367214 (Comments: 1) | Chuckton (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sidewalks in OpenStreetMap are paths alongside a street, paths that run parallel to the carriageway. So these are not sidewalks, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=sidewalk commented 2025-12-17 08:41:24 UTC by cuzi ♦140 |
| 163006080 (Comments: 1) | NJarek (Discussed changesets: 7) | Cześć! Dzięki za wkład w mapowanie terenów stoczniowych. Mam pytanie, czy ten budynek powstał jakoś niedawno: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363293228 ? Pytam, bo nie ma go na najnowszym podkładzie Esri z początku tego roku. Pozdra... commented 2025-12-17 08:34:04 UTC by czebureks ♦142 |
| 175941996 (Comments: 1) | つぼい (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Why did you change the forest to a retail area and renamed it to a plateau? commented 2025-12-17 08:31:28 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 172274807 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 13) | 👋 Is it on a private territory? If it is so, it might be worth tagging with the access tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access commented 2025-12-17 08:26:19 UTC by sosquqer ♦14 |
| 173731848 (Comments: 2) | bicyclett (Discussed changesets: 23) | ok, thanks. it is fixed now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037692 commented 2025-12-17 08:21:03 UTC by bicyclett ♦21 |
| 176036635 (Comments: 1) | Jan-Jaap Stam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-17 08:17:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176035568 (Comments: 1) | Molenwijk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-17 08:15:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,988 |
| 176027618 (Comments: 1) | 아아아이우에오 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037408 commented 2025-12-17 08:09:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176029049 (Comments: 1) | harin1998@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I have deleted this buiding, as it does not exist on the ground. Please make sure that your additions match satellite imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037383 commented 2025-12-17 08:08:20 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176028387 (Comments: 1) | Samchully (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037355 commented 2025-12-17 08:07:24 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176029227 (Comments: 1) | Samchully (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037355 commented 2025-12-17 08:07:24 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176028391 (Comments: 1) | Samchully (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037355 commented 2025-12-17 08:07:24 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176028370 (Comments: 1) | Samchully (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037355 commented 2025-12-17 08:07:24 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176027959 (Comments: 1) | Samchully (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037355 commented 2025-12-17 08:07:23 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176028357 (Comments: 1) | Samchully (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037355 commented 2025-12-17 08:07:23 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,681 |
| 176026582 (Comments: 1) | TheFighter137 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, Attention sur l'ajout des numéros de téléphone qui créent des doublons phone=* + contact:phone=* J'ai corrigé. commented 2025-12-17 08:02:54 UTC by cquest ♦284 |
| 176012159 (Comments: 1) | Senjed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice for a valid address you need addr:housenumber and addr:street. commented 2025-12-17 07:46:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176013847 (Comments: 1) | John Dork (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-12-17 07:40:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 176015555 (Comments: 1) | Landis Homes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. And please move the address to the ma... commented 2025-12-17 07:37:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,496 |
| 175692310 (Comments: 1) | Pablo Ess (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pablo Ess, this changeset has left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=12.74809&lat=47.27084&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standar... commented 2025-12-17 07:32:58 UTC by gscholz ♦2,831 |
 | 38331473 (Comments: 2) | dkunce (Discussed changesets: 5) | would it be fine to remove amenity=office as office= is present already? commented 2025-12-17 07:09:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 37010515 (Comments: 2) | TheOutpost (Discussed changesets: 9) | would it be fine to remove amenity=office as office= is present already? commented 2025-12-17 07:09:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 141217661 (Comments: 1) | baba_sigmatiq (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11188277256/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office commented 2025-12-17 07:08:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
 | 72829355 (Comments: 1) | Chemicus (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6323407526/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office commented 2025-12-17 07:08:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 153476329 (Comments: 1) | LLAQWA (Discussed changesets: 99) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10132873379/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office commented 2025-12-17 07:08:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 175957853 (Comments: 1) | lille2000 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo lille, Cool, danke fürs Eintragen. Das ist ein Thema, bei dem ich mich gar nicht auskenne... Viele Grüße Metzor commented 2025-12-17 07:08:30 UTC by Metzor ♦397 |
| 175981713 (Comments: 1) | LouisS34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi LouisS34, this changeset has left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=3.32756&lat=43.48159&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&... commented 2025-12-17 07:05:59 UTC by gscholz ♦2,831 |
| 124406810 (Comments: 3) | alex_lofi (Discussed changesets: 31) | created https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5094528 then thanks for a reply! commented 2025-12-17 06:59:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 28926547 (Comments: 3) | sorbovit (Discussed changesets: 31) | a, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327967095/history się w sumie pojawił już wcześniej a tu była tylko kosmetyczna zmiana wartości commented 2025-12-17 06:57:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 175942193 (Comments: 2) | Panzergruppe (Discussed changesets: 3) | 我恢复了这个您删除的轮廓，至于另一个您新建的和它是什么关系，希望您能做出回应 commented 2025-12-17 06:37:37 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦568 |
| 175431704 (Comments: 1) | xokYBsoFxH (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bitte keine Dinge löschen, die real vorhanden und korrekt getaggt sind. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176034631 commented 2025-12-17 06:23:19 UTC by Metzor ♦397 |
| 175431512 (Comments: 8) | xokYBsoFxH (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bitte keine Dinge löschen, die real vorhanden und korrekt getaggt sind. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176034631 commented 2025-12-17 06:23:19 UTC by Metzor ♦397 |
| 175666836 (Comments: 4) | SIDLER22 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nem nagyon láttam. Házakra meg mindkét változatot láttam már kiírva. De majd a napokban elmegyek mégegyszer arra, hátha tudom egyértelműsíteni. commented 2025-12-17 06:15:40 UTC by SIDLER22 ♦6 |
| 176029307 (Comments: 1) | Fan Day Nation (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176034232 where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits" commented 2025-12-17 06:08:37 UTC by NeisRevert ♦385 |
| 176029292 (Comments: 2) | Fan Day Nation (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176034221 where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits" commented 2025-12-17 06:08:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦385 |
| 176028570 (Comments: 2) | maksimileeuhn (Discussed changesets: 2) | In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. I have checked the mentioned elements and can confi... commented 2025-12-17 05:54:50 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 175972105 (Comments: 3) | dartkichaut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Il reste la relation 5825944 commented 2025-12-17 05:53:10 UTC by mga_geo ♦279 |
| 175995210 (Comments: 3) | Micjur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke, bartgron 👍 commented 2025-12-17 05:52:55 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 175996263 (Comments: 3) | oliwia_duras (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke, bartgron 👍 commented 2025-12-17 05:52:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,767 |
| 176019646 (Comments: 1) | Alpha Graphics Hartford (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-12-17 05:51:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,795 |
| 176032036 (Comments: 1) | brindagurumoorthy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your contribution! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176032036 commented 2025-12-17 04:54:17 UTC by QuiLe ♦20 |
| 176029269 (Comments: 2) | Ken Hall (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think this happens a lot when trying to add defibrillators as there appears to be no warning from the app if you place a duplicate accidentally and most of the maps that don’t actually render the defibrillators so the person trying to map the... commented 2025-12-17 04:51:29 UTC by nevw ♦2,099 |
| 175926668 (Comments: 1) | vaddu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2025-12-17 04:25:35 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦612 |
| 175947973 (Comments: 1) | lazarowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). I realized that you used non English (Polish?) names for your edits. Please use English f... commented 2025-12-17 04:18:55 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦612 |
 | 175595056 (Comments: 8) | 市川ゆり子 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Replacing wrong tags with more wrong tagging is hardly an improvement. Map changes should be individually reviewed unless there has been previous discussion of the edit in line with the automated edits code of conduct. Transmuting nonsense into more ... commented 2025-12-17 03:35:27 UTC by InsertUser ♦466 |
| 162958757 (Comments: 4) | 이환홍 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 감사합니다. commented 2025-12-17 03:04:16 UTC by 이환홍 ♦1 |
| 176025882 (Comments: 1) | Qizhen Ruan (Discussed changesets: 5) | please survey before editing, this is a raised crossing that is marked funny commented 2025-12-17 01:54:56 UTC by cubbe8 ♦70 |
| 176006273 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Thanks for the fix. I split the South Mullen Road way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18393395) at the point where both directions of the road divide approaching the roundabout, so the section of the road from the roundabout to where both directio... commented 2025-12-17 01:30:17 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 176012429 (Comments: 1) | Panzergruppe (Discussed changesets: 3) | 朋友您好，感谢您的贡献，只是关于 place 节点的值标注，目前的社区共识是行政村、自然村标为 village、自然村标为 hamlet，城市内的社区标为 quater，街道标为 suburb，希望您能稍稍留意 |
| 175858820 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Those incorrect map edits you made have been fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176027760. Please do not change valid administrative or suburb boundaries into roads. This is not acceptable on OSM. They shall remain as administrative or ... commented 2025-12-17 00:54:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
 | 176024362 (Comments: 3) | Ferchasa (Discussed changesets: 2) | y con el detalle que estas mapeando las manzanas, lo que va como landuse=residencial es todo lo que esta adentro de las parcelas (ahora como que lo has mapeado al cordon de la vereda). el cordon de la vereda se mapea como barrier=kerb, y las veredas ... commented 2025-12-17 00:44:23 UTC by muralito ♦2,097 |
| 176021583 (Comments: 3) | Romeorun (Discussed changesets: 1) | I fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176027760. The user who changed this suburb boundary line to an unclassified road is named TransAct-AS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TransAct-AS. I will keep monitoring user TransAct-AS, a... commented 2025-12-17 00:37:25 UTC by Frank Peng ♦100 |
| 175975790 (Comments: 1) | Onuralp Ateş (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Ege Bölgesi ilişkisinin(https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2094170) sınırlarını düzenlerken galiba yanlışlıkla bazı öğeleri silmişsiniz. Sildiğiniz öğelerden ötürü, ilişkinin bütü... commented 2025-12-17 00:31:01 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦191 |
| 176011945 (Comments: 1) | Baron Harkonnen (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi. I disagree with mapping this historic site as power plant as it hasn't produced electricity in more than 100 years. IMO it should be mapped as historic site only. commented 2025-12-17 00:20:46 UTC by muralito ♦2,097 |
| 175997058 (Comments: 3) | WPF Westfield (Discussed changesets: 2) | Understood, but it does exist on the ground, has recently been used even if there's no permitted right of way as evidenced by Strava Heat Maps, and the tagging (with rskedgell's correction) does indicate that public use is not permitted. Th... commented 2025-12-17 00:06:12 UTC by amosharper ♦38 |
| 162910706 (Comments: 1) | yesidlargov (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12616606834/history has building:name = Cedro Negro that was added in this edit Is building:name for building name? In such case it would be much better to put it into name tag. If this object merges buili... commented 2025-12-17 00:02:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,071 |
| 176016857 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 114) | Thanks for catching this, should have double-checked it when making my changes earlier. commented 2025-12-16 23:58:32 UTC by amosharper ♦38 |