| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 168934361 (Comments: 1) | KhalidKashmiri (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dzięki za przywrócenie. commented 2025-07-14 20:37:19 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,060 |
 | 163130982 (Comments: 6) | mga_geo (Discussed changesets: 67) | les lignes scolaires ne sont désservis qu'en période scolaire. Plus ou moins logique qu'ils disparaissent en été. L'arrêt a été déplacé au niveau du sentier : https:/... commented 2025-07-14 20:34:36 UTC by trial ♦870 |
 | 168929346 (Comments: 1) | FastTom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Tom :) darf ich dir die aktuelle Dokumentation zu Ladestationen ans Herz legen? Ggf. kannst du diese dann noch einmal anpassen, da du sie mutmaßlich kennst. Grüße silversurfer83 https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-07-14 20:32:05 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
 | 168894893 (Comments: 4) | cgracia88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I work for an Amazon DSP, I’m a delivery driver. I got injured on the job where I tore three ligaments in my foot out here in Kalihi Valley. So they wanted me to work on volunteer work for “Task Manager” and then I learned that I ne... commented 2025-07-14 20:27:23 UTC by cgracia88 ♦1 |
| 168906926 (Comments: 1) | Sharky1337 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi :) in diesen Fällen wäre es in meinen Augen sehr angebracht zu spezifizieren, ob der Zugang öffentlich oder nicht öffentlich ist Grüße silversurfer83 --- ... commented 2025-07-14 20:23:36 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
 | 168559459 (Comments: 4) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | OK, ik zie het. Norbert Fonteynestraat is zo'n voorbeeld in dit gebied. commented 2025-07-14 20:09:04 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 168922569 (Comments: 2) | EGoodr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please also place the flock camera at the physical location of the camera, not on the street intersection. I have moved it to the location that I think it is based on imagery, but don't know for sure. Please check my work! commented 2025-07-14 20:08:25 UTC by citrula ♦857 |
 | 164600523 (Comments: 3) | User5848 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sorry that I have been busy recently, but name=* tags cannot detect cardinal directions: it's not a technical capability on OpenStreetMap. The name change you made could not be justified in any reasonable way, mainly because of the reasons provi... commented 2025-07-14 20:00:07 UTC by ika-chan! ♦245 |
| 168889377 (Comments: 3) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 90) | To tylko informacja bo może dzięki temu będzie trochę mniej takich rzeczy a przy okazji jakieś doświadczenie. Takich i podobnych obiektów jest nie do przeliczenia. Włączyłem też podkład obrysów budynków i dla t... commented 2025-07-14 19:58:11 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦465 |
 | 69696 (Comments: 1) | smuldal (Discussed changesets: 1) | NiceNice and a half commented 2025-07-14 19:54:30 UTC by JaySch ♦6 |
| 6969696 (Comments: 1) | X@v (Discussed changesets: 1) | NiceNiceNice and a half commented 2025-07-14 19:54:12 UTC by JaySch ♦6 |
 | 69696969 (Comments: 3) | akiro-t (Discussed changesets: 1) | NiceNiceNiceNice commented 2025-07-14 19:53:53 UTC by JaySch ♦6 |
| 6969 (Comments: 3) | Andy Street (Discussed changesets: 7) | NiceNice commented 2025-07-14 19:53:31 UTC by JaySch ♦6 |
| 69 (Comments: 4) | zool (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nice commented 2025-07-14 19:53:21 UTC by JaySch ♦6 |
 | 161215105 (Comments: 1) | LakeHulun (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi LakeHulun, it looks like you accidentally dragged the Campbell Road. In my opinion, highway=residential is not correct in this case. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1350028436 Several roads drawn by your former colleagues also n... commented 2025-07-14 19:44:23 UTC by rab ♦566 |
| 168898285 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 122) | Hi, I think that a trailhead is not a trail riding station and especially not an equestrian center (leisure=horse_riding) as it is described in the wiki. Here is an example of an equestrian centre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228517621#m... commented 2025-07-14 19:41:32 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦756 |
| 168933119 (Comments: 1) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 90) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400561464 |
| 168891696 (Comments: 1) | robinkgray (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. You seem to have changed the name of these waterways to the city they are located in. This is not correct. Maybe you can describe what you are trying to do here so we can point you in the right direction? https://www.openstreet... commented 2025-07-14 19:37:44 UTC by citrula ♦857 |
| 168925520 (Comments: 1) | A-Rth-Urp-Hil-Ipdenu (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi! Nice work. Just a little note. The wiki regarding the definition (in OSM terms) and use of service=driveway ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway ) defines it as "a minor service road leading to a specific property&quo... commented 2025-07-14 19:32:52 UTC by IpswichEdits ♦25 |
| 168739033 (Comments: 4) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 144) | Tak, to miałem na myśli, ale droga na dalszą milę jest lepsza przez Metalowców lub Bystrzycką czy Balonową, a nie Bajana. commented 2025-07-14 19:26:33 UTC by pavvv ♦498 |
| 168930933 (Comments: 2) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. If the road ends at the city limit simply end the road at the city limit, but removing the land track and driveway features ... commented 2025-07-14 19:26:05 UTC by MassCartog ♦126 |
 | 162373230 (Comments: 3) | sezar bd (Discussed changesets: 3) | HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi, bunu ve alttaki değişiklik setini revertlememiz daha doğru olmaz mı? Geçmişi olan nokta silinip tekrar eksik bir şekilde tekrar eklenmiş. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162372484 commented 2025-07-14 19:25:52 UTC by keyyushi ♦6 |
| 168559744 (Comments: 13) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 593) | Moje pytanie jest, czy jesteś w stanie pokazać 2 punkty na obrzeżach miasta (a następnie przechodzące przez centrum zamiast obwodnicy), gdzie główna i najlepsza trasa pomiędzy nimi prowadzi przez Sienkiewicza, Drobnera i Dubois? commented 2025-07-14 19:24:49 UTC by pavvv ♦498 |
 | 168900146 (Comments: 5) | soshial (Discussed changesets: 14) | too complicated, if you want I can give you instructions for using orthophotos in iD or JOSM commented 2025-07-14 19:21:49 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦103 |
 | 168930368 (Comments: 1) | Carpathians (Discussed changesets: 25) | Is horse=no here correctly? commented 2025-07-14 19:14:37 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦138 |
| 168930656 (Comments: 1) | Carpathians (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hey is the name by the parking correct? Greetings commented 2025-07-14 19:13:31 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦138 |
| 168929905 (Comments: 1) | Too Tall Paul (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you are removing in this and other changesets are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the groun... commented 2025-07-14 19:08:51 UTC by MassCartog ♦126 |
| 168931399 (Comments: 1) | Too Tall Paul (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you are removing in this and other changesets are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the groun... commented 2025-07-14 19:08:42 UTC by MassCartog ♦126 |
| 168910645 (Comments: 1) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 92) | Coś to jest nie za dobrze zmienione. Wschodnia jezdnia jest zbudowana. commented 2025-07-14 19:03:25 UTC by YomanNH ♦309 |
| 168848326 (Comments: 1) | Rogoyski (Discussed changesets: 61) | Tak lokalne zmiany lepiej opisywać po polsku, a przynajmniej źródło, bo tak przetłumaczone trudniej znaleźć - uchwała jest po polsku, więc nawet obcokrajowcowi było by na rękę mieć szybciej inputa po którym znajdzie uchwał... commented 2025-07-14 19:02:42 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦130 |
 | 168703601 (Comments: 1) | Marco_1231 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Weil Migros Do it ist nicht mehr da ist, wurde das Ladenlokal durch mich in ein leerstehendes Lokal geändert "disused:shop: doityourself" mit dem alten Namen hinterlegt: old_name: Do it + Garden Migros Bitte nicht einf... commented 2025-07-14 18:59:39 UTC by bresomch ♦12 |
| 168760834 (Comments: 2) | olimago (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thanks for your alert. It was a mistype, i meant batteries. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168931447#map=19/45.848219/3.531297 commented 2025-07-14 18:48:16 UTC by olimago ♦6 |
| 168879162 (Comments: 5) | klaus555 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Treppe ergänzt. Routen schaue ich mir an, wenn ich das dort das nächste Mal vorbeikommen commented 2025-07-14 18:33:46 UTC by limes11 ♦892 |
| 164735848 (Comments: 1) | Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 173) | Hi Nakaner :). Der Aufzug zum U-Bahnhof Rathaus Steglitz scheint nicht verbunden und nicht Teil der Relation. Ist der noch nicht in Betrieb? Ich war schon länger nicht mehr dort. Viele Grüße commented 2025-07-14 18:33:10 UTC by kartograph ♦31 |
 | 167027398 (Comments: 2) | vasony (Discussed changesets: 40) | Bocsánat, a link helyesen: https://osm.org/node/12875549804 commented 2025-07-14 18:32:40 UTC by gymate ♦34 |
| 168398844 (Comments: 3) | konjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Die Beschilderung sagt "Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei", aber der Mietvertrag des Grillplatzes erlaubt die Nutzung zum Be- und Entladen. Daher motor_vehicle=destination gesetzt. commented 2025-07-14 18:30:32 UTC by limes11 ♦892 |
| 168447547 (Comments: 2) | Atanas Angelov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Have now updated to better represent access: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168930634 commented 2025-07-14 18:28:04 UTC by mstrbrid ♦28 |
 | 168927894 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 10) | Creating a historical boundary, and then make a note "THIS IS NOT A HISTORICAL BOUNDARY". What kind of contribution is this? commented 2025-07-14 18:18:27 UTC by Tommybara ♦91 |
 | 164476408 (Comments: 1) | 255Nechi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the official English spelling of the street (what's on the street sign) actually "CXhalom Yossef"? commented 2025-07-14 18:17:43 UTC by mkopinsky ♦55 |
| 156104497 (Comments: 4) | sauerland-radfahrer (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hallo sauerland-radfahrer, es gibt zu diesem Multipolygon grade eine Diskussion im Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/versteht-jemand-dieses-multipolygon/132699 Ich bin mir unsicher, ob du Multipolygone richtig verstanden hast.... commented 2025-07-14 18:15:59 UTC by os-emmer ♦340 |
| 168889569 (Comments: 5) | maaxy_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dziekuje bardzo za wytkniecie bledow. Nauczyles mnie czegos nowego :) Zycze milego tygodnia! commented 2025-07-14 18:09:02 UTC by maaxy_ ♦4 |
| 158910500 (Comments: 14) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 144) | > Propozycja to nie metoda. I oczywiście takie zasady należałoby omówić w społeczności OSM dla całego kraju. I najlepiej jakoś zatwierdzić. Wiem. Po prostu zauważyłem, że we Wrocławiu taka reguła bardzo dobrze odzwierci... commented 2025-07-14 18:02:22 UTC by pavvv ♦498 |
 | 168773799 (Comments: 4) | MrManor (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ked af at være påholdende, men der bor ældre borgere i kvarteret der har problemer med at få Flextrafik til at hente dem, når de skal til hospitalet eller andet. Flextrafik henviser selv til at de benytter OSM. Tak f... commented 2025-07-14 18:00:26 UTC by MrManor ♦5 |
| 165720184 (Comments: 8) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 170) | Dzięki za informację. W Czechach było to ważne do 2016 roku. Od tego czasu ciężarówka to każdy pojazd, który jest zarejestrowany jako ciężarówka, więc obejmuje to nie tylko samochody dostawcze, ale także pickupy i komb... commented 2025-07-14 17:58:36 UTC by 🇨🇿 Roman Horník ♦20 |
 | 168836779 (Comments: 3) | rexbron (Discussed changesets: 1) | So I think there's two questions: - What was meant in your edit? - What should be tagged in OSM? An OpenStreetMap preset project has included "City of Toronto" and Q172 when a park operator is entered as something like... commented 2025-07-14 17:55:52 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦322 |
| 164006507 (Comments: 5) | sabas88 (Discussed changesets: 76) | Beh, In Piazza Brin (a La Spezia) non sono esistenti, nemmeno in Viale Italia (Maggiolina) manco è nella strada, c'è da capire se gli ha importati a cavolo mcheck, ma è bannato quindi non si potrà contattare. per fare... commented 2025-07-14 17:54:56 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦51 |
| 168929037 (Comments: 1) | VoltEdge Electrical Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 17:45:57 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168543058 (Comments: 1) | tesp (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hei, eikö Kuralankaartelle sopisi paremmin highway=tertiary, kun yhdistää trunk-tien ja toisen tertiary-tien? commented 2025-07-14 17:39:05 UTC by Larmax ♦271 |
| 168922907 (Comments: 1) | EmilioNYC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1414670580 . What is the mean of the tag religion=* ?Did you mean religion=none?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion commented 2025-07-14 17:34:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 165887092 (Comments: 1) | Ryan Watern (Discussed changesets: 14) | I added Ohio Avenue based on a photo of a stop sign at the intersection of Memes Street, but am not sure how far the road extends commented 2025-07-14 17:33:33 UTC by Arlo James Barnes ♦101 |
| 168928090 (Comments: 1) | PardusPanteri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maltepe'ye yaptığınız eklemeler için tebrik etmek isterim. Katkılarınızın devamı dileğiyle 👏🏻👏🏻 commented 2025-07-14 17:24:42 UTC by Eren00 ♦8 |
| 168760196 (Comments: 2) | C1tizenfour (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Effectivement j'ai dû faire l'erreur de supprimer des parkings accolés aux bornes de vélo en libre service. Je vais les rajouter. Je suis aller voir sur le terrain directement. J'ai une photo de chaqu... commented 2025-07-14 17:16:54 UTC by C1tizenfour ♦1 |
| 168927375 (Comments: 1) | mountainview2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi mountainview2, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment fi... commented 2025-07-14 17:06:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168818741 (Comments: 1) | PerpetualHiker (Discussed changesets: 17) | Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Maxar Satellite Imagery via MGP Pro 2025-07-02; Mapillary commented 2025-07-14 17:05:16 UTC by PerpetualHiker ♦19 |
 | 168927160 (Comments: 1) | Catastro_fico (Discussed changesets: 1) | El horario cambia mucho, he puesto el horario de verano actual. Según la web el local tiene el número 26, sin embargo la puerta está donde he puesto el nodo. commented 2025-07-14 16:59:57 UTC by Catastro_fico ♦1 |
 | 168864005 (Comments: 1) | mohammadi-mahdii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please habe a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12901499838. What is the mean of the tags waste = mixed;پسماند_تر_تفکیک_شده_،پسماند_خشک_تحویل_غرفه_یا_نوماند شمارره = 10 Please n... commented 2025-07-14 16:58:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168926570 (Comments: 1) | fmc_3 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I had a confict in a Flixbus-relation. I hope I did the resolving how it is supposed. Sorry for the big changeset boundary box. The intended changes where all done in Berlin-Charlottenburg. commented 2025-07-14 16:55:09 UTC by fmc_3 ♦3 |
 | 168866509 (Comments: 1) | Yu-Chang (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1414406190. What is the mean of the tag 建築物編號 = A26? commented 2025-07-14 16:54:32 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168895597 (Comments: 1) | Yu-Chang (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1414545147. What is the mean of the tag 建築物編碼 = A11? commented 2025-07-14 16:53:17 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168926484 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 416) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-07-14 16:41:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
 | 168403175 (Comments: 1) | Charlotte DIAZ ANILLO (Discussed changesets: 2) | the footprins you added here are likely temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. You corectly modified the residential area to avoid overlap with the footprints you added. --- Published using OSMCh... commented 2025-07-14 16:29:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
 | 168877411 (Comments: 2) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 18) | Der Note Bockshörndlstraße 14/7 ist ein versehen was mir passiert ist, da ich die Adresse der Hausnummer 11 kopiert und zur Nummer 4 geändert habe. Bei der Adresse die ich danach eingefügt habe, habe ich den Fehler anscheinend be... commented 2025-07-14 16:26:53 UTC by vikiawv ♦15 |
| 168403507 (Comments: 1) | Charlotte DIAZ ANILLO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Charlotte, the footprint you added my represent a temporal yurt and perhaps should not have been added. It has been rounded correctly but is oversized. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution.... commented 2025-07-14 16:21:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168403145 (Comments: 1) | Marie-Christine DESCHAMP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Marie. The footprints you mapped here are valid and appropriately squared. The western one is inaccurate the Easterone is almost accurate but is slightly too long see how I mapped them in Changeset: 168925772. Please keep this feedback in mind wh... commented 2025-07-14 16:19:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168879904 (Comments: 2) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ich sollte es nun ausgebessert haben. Jetzt steht der nicht-verifizierbare Name nur noch als Notiz drinnen. Danke fürs drüberschauen ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168925656 commented 2025-07-14 16:17:49 UTC by vikiawv ♦15 |
 | 168885082 (Comments: 2) | archie (Discussed changesets: 264) | Rätt placering och skylt? Kan det bli bättre? commented 2025-07-14 16:16:05 UTC by archie ♦1,305 |
| 168878655 (Comments: 1) | wilfisher (Discussed changesets: 24) | Thank you! commented 2025-07-14 16:11:50 UTC by valaise ♦11 |
| 168393003 (Comments: 2) | TheoWgt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo FroschForscher, das ist richtig. Ich bin noch "Lernender" hier. Hatte keine passendere Zuordnung gefunden. Ich werde die Korrektur versuchen. Danke für Deinen Hinweis commented 2025-07-14 16:08:07 UTC by TheoWgt ♦1 |
| 119611530 (Comments: 1) | boe_rdi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, gibt's bei den Wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232589691 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038703110 tatsächlich eine Begrenzung auf 3 km/h? commented 2025-07-14 16:00:08 UTC by wolfbert ♦109 |
| 168756645 (Comments: 3) | beddy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for drawing my attention to MapRoulette. I would consider complaining about lack of a direction= tag here to be a “false positive” in Osmose terms. After all, if this tag were necessary, one wouldn't need to rely on slow MapRo... commented 2025-07-14 15:53:25 UTC by CRCulver ♦191 |
| 168919036 (Comments: 2) | CaptainCarte (Discussed changesets: 32) | Danke für den Hinweis. Kann ich die Tage machen. commented 2025-07-14 15:52:52 UTC by CaptainCarte ♦12 |
| 168798709 (Comments: 2) | 2019XCR (Discussed changesets: 2) | I'm not sure how I moved the fairway and green as I had no idea I could do that until you mentioned it. I moved it back to where it should be. Thanks for letting me know. commented 2025-07-14 15:47:01 UTC by 2019XCR ♦2 |
| 168924224 (Comments: 1) | Anders L (Discussed changesets: 4) | I was there, so source: Survey commented 2025-07-14 15:42:56 UTC by Anders L ♦2 |
| 168913348 (Comments: 3) | Linie29 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Aha, OK! Es scheint aber trotzdem nicht richtig getaggt zu sein, da eine Deckenstromschiene lt. OSM Wiki electrified=contact_line ist. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:electrified%3Dcontact_line "Specifies that a railway ... commented 2025-07-14 15:31:18 UTC by thopf ♦78 |
| 165207680 (Comments: 1) | Stefan Ribeiro (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, bei der Angabe der Telefonnummer wird das internationale Format verwendet: + 49 381 ... anstelle von 0381.... Gruß Protoxenus commented 2025-07-14 15:22:47 UTC by Protoxenus ♦315 |
| 168082159 (Comments: 6) | rolfdieter (Discussed changesets: 12) | Wasn Zufall :) Bin da heute morgen auch wieder mal mit KFZ nach Flechtdorf hoch und konnte einen Blick werfen. Mal die Stadt fragen, was hier der Plan ist. Danke dir für's kontrollieren. commented 2025-07-14 15:15:55 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
 | 168922766 (Comments: 1) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 235) | Bron: https://www.deventer.nl/verkeer-en-vervoer/werkzaamheden-aan-wegen-en-wijken/bouw-kop-handelskade commented 2025-07-14 15:13:15 UTC by dvdhoven ♦921 |
| 168888228 (Comments: 1) | Harzer123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi there :) what is the intention behind "line=no". You set this tag on several objects, for example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103911832 --- Published using OSMCha: http... commented 2025-07-14 15:06:13 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168907269 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 10) | If you keep creating nonsense "historic boundaries" like this again, I'm afraid I'm gonna have to report you to the Volunteer Team. commented 2025-07-14 15:00:29 UTC by Tommybara ♦91 |
| 125704247 (Comments: 4) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 195) | Dann mache ich auch `unisex=no` ein `male=yes` Happy mapping, habi commented 2025-07-14 14:51:31 UTC by habi ♦1,846 |
| 168849710 (Comments: 4) | Yamski (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey Pascal! Wasn't sure this was you or not. Love your tools! I agree with everything you say. I'm a "mega active" mapper, mostly due to golf course cleanup over the last few years. I was already cleaning up the edits from ... commented 2025-07-14 14:45:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦663 |
| 160295319 (Comments: 3) | timmito (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ich hab die Buslinien jetzt entsprechend gekürzt. Danke für die Antwort! commented 2025-07-14 14:42:44 UTC by Senihtu ♦74 |
| 168913882 (Comments: 2) | Roger Fischer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Habi, Danke für deine Antwort. Ich habe den Weg gerade für den VelObserver fotografiert und hier sind ja Velo- und Fussweg klar getrennt. Und eine Kreuzung vorher ist der Radweg auch bereits eingezeichnet. Beim VelObse... commented 2025-07-14 14:41:29 UTC by Roger Fischer ♦1 |
 | 168617776 (Comments: 3) | Theodreee (Discussed changesets: 1) | To be honest I am still trying to get the gist of vehicle access for residents only. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values states that "'access only for residents' is motor_vehicle=private", but I ... commented 2025-07-14 14:26:19 UTC by ika-chan! ♦245 |
| 156391535 (Comments: 5) | Naturpark Ammergauer Alpen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo martinst, danke für deinen Hinweis, der Parkplatz ist weiterhin gebührenpflichtig. commented 2025-07-14 14:25:12 UTC by Naturpark Ammergauer Alpen ♦5 |
| 168631572 (Comments: 1) | seattlefyi (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hey! Thanks for this! At what point should we mark this area as construction for Radiator Springs and remove the river of america and the (now old) Tom Sawyer Island? commented 2025-07-14 14:24:16 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦23 |
| 168814366 (Comments: 1) | Tergestinus (Discussed changesets: 1) | occhio a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071924456 commented 2025-07-14 14:23:44 UTC by alessandrocarmeli ♦236 |
| 168919734 (Comments: 1) | andershl (Discussed changesets: 95) | Keramikruten er stadig fyldt med huller commented 2025-07-14 14:23:37 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,647 |
 | 168781694 (Comments: 1) | Geo_9276 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Th... commented 2025-07-14 14:23:23 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦97 |
| 168904401 (Comments: 2) | 2137xd (Discussed changesets: 15) | Nigdzie nie zaznaczyłem ronda jako skrzyżowania bezkolizyjnego - jedynie drogi prowadzące do ronda oraz wiadukt nad nim i tunel pod nim. Rozumiem, że mogłeś się przyczepić do relacji z Al. Prymasa Tysiąclecia w kierunku Al. Jerozolimskich na... commented 2025-07-14 14:03:22 UTC by 2137xd ♦11 |
 | 63715165 (Comments: 1) | priyanika (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Se dibujan los edificios tal como son, no solo polígonos arriba de las casas. No hacemos dibujos esquemáticos. saludos commented 2025-07-14 13:48:35 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 168652696 (Comments: 4) | 12071942 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Stephanie, shop=massage käme evtl. in Frage?! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage Ich fürchte, was ganz genau passendes wird man nicht finden. ;-) Evtl. noch mit massage=... verfeinern. https://wiki.o... commented 2025-07-14 13:42:40 UTC by disc24 ♦26 |
| 168917309 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 416) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244227221 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-07-14 13:31:25 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168917355 (Comments: 1) | YuliyaSurta (Discussed changesets: 51) | Also fixed road geometry. commented 2025-07-14 13:21:57 UTC by YuliyaSurta ♦51 |
| 168708661 (Comments: 2) | fmc_9 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo mueschel, danke für den Hinweis. Wir stellen unser Mapping um auf source:cycleway:left:width. Die bestehenden Tags massen-updaten wir in den nächsten Tagen. PS: Die Mapping-Arbeit ist Teil von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... commented 2025-07-14 13:17:51 UTC by tordans ♦410 |
| 168848663 (Comments: 1) | yinef12012 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Full street names are expected without abbrevation, also description tag is not an appropriate venue for ad copy. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168848663 |
| 168916634 (Comments: 1) | lukbas (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684053254 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-07-14 13:11:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168010903 (Comments: 5) | gt3400 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Okay, danke. Wollte nur einen Edit-War verhindern :-) commented 2025-07-14 13:09:34 UTC by kuhni74 ♦363 |
 | 168898867 (Comments: 3) | hunter_y (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI 1. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property 2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F If the paths are visible on the ground it's best to use some combin... commented 2025-07-14 13:01:43 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
 | 168365201 (Comments: 9) | LakeThingvalla (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, at least some years ago the "via" member was not supported by some data consumers, for that reason I mapped a lot of these restrictions as no_left_turn. I would expect that was fixed nowadays but it seems that it hasn't happened ... commented 2025-07-14 12:51:34 UTC by muralito ♦2,022 |
 | 134860625 (Comments: 6) | Joni Gritzner (Discussed changesets: 6) | סבבה, תודה על ההערה שמח שיש מי שעובר על הדברים מידי פעם commented 2025-07-14 12:40:20 UTC by Joni Gritzner ♦3 |
| 165723586 (Comments: 1) | John KNC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi John, There is an untagged way (part of a relation) across what looks like a field and fenced off pub garden. Does such a path really exist on the ground, or should the paths running north then west from the SE corner be part of the Augusti... commented 2025-07-14 12:37:58 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦8 |
| 168893225 (Comments: 1) | Matx_29 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola. highway=busway es para vías segregadas. Por favor consultar a la comunidad o a la wiki para estos cambios. Asímismo, sidewalk son veredas. Cmabié esos caminos a corridor, que es lo que hay en el terminal Alameda. Por ... commented 2025-07-14 12:36:22 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 168895989 (Comments: 3) | TereseWilcock123456789 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi are you making these edits on behalf of Isaac Regional Council? We need to be careful when incorporating copyrighted materials into OSM to ensure it can be licensed under OSM's license. Generally we need a waiver letter to incorporate ... commented 2025-07-14 12:32:53 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 168914628 (Comments: 1) | imanmh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 12:24:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168662067 (Comments: 2) | Josef K (Discussed changesets: 20) | Olá aselvadeasfalto, Não foi propriamente revertida, foi sim alterada em dois aspectos: (1) o pátio das escolas (highways=pedestrian, area=yes) voltou a ser uma área simples em vez de um multipolígono.... commented 2025-07-14 12:24:14 UTC by Josef K ♦46 |
| 97926211 (Comments: 5) | alice23 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke commented 2025-07-14 12:21:38 UTC by gt3400 ♦22 |
| 168890374 (Comments: 1) | Reporter80 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-14 12:18:29 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168889989 (Comments: 2) | Timodegier (Discussed changesets: 1) | Door de wijziging staat de shop twee keer op de kaart en is huisnummer 7 verwijderd van de kaart. ik pas het even aan. commented 2025-07-14 12:15:16 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168895247 (Comments: 1) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola. Dejé los edificios por separado. Aun cuando estén juntos, se dibujan por separados. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168895247 commented 2025-07-14 12:15:06 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 168914004 (Comments: 1) | hamiltont_nova_Import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi hamiltont_nova_Import, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: No primary map features!? Could y... commented 2025-07-14 12:10:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168914015 (Comments: 1) | hamiltont_nova_Import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi hamiltont_nova_Import, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: No primary map features!? Could y... commented 2025-07-14 12:10:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168914024 (Comments: 1) | hamiltont_nova_Import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi hamiltont_nova_Import, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: No primary map features!? Could y... commented 2025-07-14 12:10:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 162674457 (Comments: 1) | kuba743 (Discussed changesets: 27) | ale jest w budowie – więc chyba mogłoby zostać `motorway_link`? 🤔 commented 2025-07-14 12:08:41 UTC by dzamper ♦112 |
| 168913878 (Comments: 1) | hamiltont_nova_Import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi hamiltont_nova_Import, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 building(s) Could you please c... commented 2025-07-14 12:08:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 6839220 (Comments: 1) | harry_br (Discussed changesets: 1) | die treppe hat keinen Anschluss - bitte anpassen commented 2025-07-14 12:03:10 UTC by townlion ♦256 |
| 168886256 (Comments: 2) | l1neme0w (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lijkt mij een privé zaak die beter niet op de kaart kan staan. Stel je voor dat het uitgaanspubliek daar brand gaat stichten. Ik stel dan ook voor om dit weer te verwijderen van de kaart. commented 2025-07-14 12:00:26 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 161025637 (Comments: 3) | Lulucmy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Je pense qu'il faudrait supprimer ce point et signaler ce problème à la mairie. Il s'agit obligatoirement d'une erreur. commented 2025-07-14 11:55:01 UTC by jcr83 ♦222 |
| 168912845 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 416) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244878098 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-07-14 11:51:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168913017 (Comments: 1) | badifire (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-07-14 11:51:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 151824328 (Comments: 1) | riopradipto (Discussed changesets: 1) | not generally accessible anymore, it's a business now commented 2025-07-14 11:50:48 UTC by cumbrekumpel ♦1 |
| 168886140 (Comments: 2) | pluqstudio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-14 11:50:08 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168882513 (Comments: 1) | Osa7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-14 11:48:08 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| X | 168308309 (Comments: 6) | Marian Mika (Discussed changesets: 23) | skúmam to z rôznych strán, už aj cez osmcha.org, ale vôbec netuším čo by tento "fantómový" changeset mohol byť. napadá ma, čo by urobil revert tohto changesetu. aspoň aby nez... commented 2025-07-14 11:47:09 UTC by Marian Mika ♦22 |
| 168859868 (Comments: 1) | Hans de Kleine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-14 11:45:23 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 164393364 (Comments: 6) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 50) | najpierw powołujesz się na art 33, że rower musi jechać ddr, która wyznaczona jest w kierunku, którym się porusza, a potem twierdzisz, że jezdnia ronda prowadzi w tym kierunku, ale w ogóle pomijasz błąd logiczny, że DDR,... commented 2025-07-14 11:42:22 UTC by Yog Sot ♦238 |
| 168436493 (Comments: 1) | bbdr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, die Eckgrundstücke in Wr. Neustadt besitzen alle 2 Identadressen mit entspr. Orientierungsnummern, auch wenn meistens nur eine davon vor Ort beschildert ist, siehe https://kataster.bev.gv.at/#/center/16.22503,47.8072/zoom/19.1... commented 2025-07-14 11:38:21 UTC by Luzandro ♦910 |
| 168842375 (Comments: 3) | Rado20010205 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please give a reaction in the Dutch forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-voor-blinden-en-slechtzienden/132685 commented 2025-07-14 11:38:01 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168904067 (Comments: 3) | Asteliks (Discussed changesets: 20) | > ale oznacza, że jeśli droga dla rowerów istnieje na danym odcinku, to rowerzysta powinien tak zaplanować trasę, żeby z niej skorzystać. Nie, to jest twoja interpretacja, której Art. 33. PoRD zaprzecza ;) bicyc... commented 2025-07-14 11:35:02 UTC by Yog Sot ♦238 |
| 168898318 (Comments: 2) | fajijfpeiwkvok (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted. (vandalism) #168898318, #168898313, #168898310, #168898302 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168912335 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2025-07-14 11:31:41 UTC by Mappin' Jack Flash ♦225 |
| 168873953 (Comments: 1) | Sv8x (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hoi Sv8x, Door het schuiven met de kaart heb je in Leiden N aanzienlijke schade aan de kaart veroorzaakt. Dat kun je hier zien: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168873953 Ik heb de kaart weer gerepareerd. TIP: twee ... commented 2025-07-14 11:17:23 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168911368 (Comments: 1) | arthocremovals (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 11:16:19 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 147170944 (Comments: 1) | Mose53 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao Mose53, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862771522/ come mai questo edificio ha altezza=0? Un errore? grazie e buon mapping commented 2025-07-14 11:11:30 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,700 |
| 161601550 (Comments: 2) | Rouben&Marina (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ripristino situazione precedente per mancata risposta dopo sei mesi. commented 2025-07-14 11:08:07 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,700 |
| 168524706 (Comments: 2) | Mannivu (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hi, thanks for letting me know about this issue. I am pretty sure I didn't touch that segment when doing this edit; anyway should be fixed now. commented 2025-07-14 11:06:38 UTC by Mannivu ♦215 |
 | 168910694 (Comments: 1) | Saint Javelin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 11:03:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168830798 (Comments: 3) | Brazil Singh (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Oscar, The reason to move the nodes is because I inspected all the imagery, and I saw they were not aligned with the nodes. So I moved little bit so that it can be aligned, even though it is also not perfect. Next time, I will try to do in smaller... commented 2025-07-14 11:01:40 UTC by Brazil Singh ♦5 |
| 168908293 (Comments: 1) | andershl (Discussed changesets: 95) | Det ser tosset ud: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19351326 commented 2025-07-14 10:55:27 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,647 |
| 168893191 (Comments: 6) | KhalidKashmiri (Discussed changesets: 6) | Racja, powinienem był zweryfikować na taginfo. Tym samym pod wieczór przeniosę na linie. commented 2025-07-14 10:49:02 UTC by KhalidKashmiri ♦6 |
| 167572478 (Comments: 3) | mstrbrid (Discussed changesets: 9) | I'll have a look later today, but I strongly suspect that it's a mapping error by Atanas. Although not designated 1-way, the end of Dulcie rd there does work as an effective mini rotary preventing gridlock where parked cars have made it too... commented 2025-07-14 10:48:20 UTC by mstrbrid ♦28 |
| 168909906 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 170) | Rondo rysowałem całkowicie na oko, więc jeśli ktoś ma lepszy podkład lub ślad GPS, to zapraszam do poprawy commented 2025-07-14 10:41:57 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦712 |
| 168847433 (Comments: 1) | Anthuil (Discussed changesets: 7) | Your edit unfortunately damaged some building outlines. Please do not trace buildings from (distorted) aerial imagery. In Belgium, buildings should follow numerical imagery provided by governments. For Wallonia, the available layer is ... commented 2025-07-14 10:39:57 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 163446527 (Comments: 1) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 45) | I see that you have mapped traffic lanes on several sections of road in this area as separate ways, which is usually only correct where there is physical carriageway separation over an extended distance. We have tags like lanes=* + lanes:forward=* + ... commented 2025-07-14 10:35:45 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,478 |
| 160189637 (Comments: 3) | taketaketake (Discussed changesets: 34) | 失礼しました。履歴から辿ったつもりでしたが見誤ってしまったようです。 refについては根拠が見当たらなかったのでこちらで適正に修正作業をすることにしました。 commented 2025-07-14 10:07:36 UTC by fūrai-bō ♦3 |
| 168649688 (Comments: 1) | Pelanch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Light-rail n'a rien à voir avec un métro léger. Cela signifie que c'est une voie ferrée spécialement aménagée pour pouvoir accueillir des trains à une certaine vitesse, tout en é... commented 2025-07-14 09:52:12 UTC by AurélienQ ♦125 |
| 168524683 (Comments: 2) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 593) | To może z innej strony: czy już każdy router potrafi po nim prowadzić? Zasadniczo poza tym nie mam zastrzeżen do highway=platform (w odróżnieniu od railway=platform). commented 2025-07-14 09:44:12 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,272 |
| 168904790 (Comments: 1) | HAPKOMAHcer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cześć. Czy sprawdziłeś w terenie, jakie faktycznie są nazwy sklepów? To jest sieć franczyzowa, sklepy mogą mieć różne nazwy, co chyba sam potwierdzasz stosując te dziwne wartości tagu branch. Może network=Chorten było... commented 2025-07-14 09:42:16 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,272 |
 | 160313691 (Comments: 1) | xsisetx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12426177367/history has shop = tienda that was added in this edit shop=tienda ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openst... commented 2025-07-14 09:41:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168907087 (Comments: 1) | C76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das ist falsch - habe mich verklickt - bitte Löschen. commented 2025-07-14 09:40:09 UTC by C76 ♦1 |
| 168904858 (Comments: 1) | Bartishio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168907319 commented 2025-07-14 09:39:28 UTC by IreuN ♦68 |
| 168883208 (Comments: 1) | Bistromath (Discussed changesets: 13) | This segment is passable for bicycle and foot traffic, A lot of joggers pass through there everyday. However, it does not seem to be ccessible by cars. Did they remove the bollards and/or opened the tunnel back? commented 2025-07-14 09:37:51 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦354 |
| 168898298 (Comments: 1) | Sawyer777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM! Thanks for your edits, here I just noticed two small things. * for simple stairs we typically don't create building:part area, but rather draw a simple line tagged as highway=steps. https://wiki.openstreet... commented 2025-07-14 09:18:49 UTC by Mashin ♦562 |
| 168837111 (Comments: 3) | drazde (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ok, pomeriggio vado a Jesolo, allora vedo e sistemo. Saluti commented 2025-07-14 09:09:03 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦284 |
| 167857715 (Comments: 2) | Kilencfarku Macska (Discussed changesets: 6) | Szia Tamás! Ellenőriztem: Bár ez terepen sehol nem jelzik, a park egyik felét (hrsz 2556) valóban hivatalosan így hívják, javítottam. Köszönöm az észrevé... commented 2025-07-14 09:04:53 UTC by Kilencfarku Macska ♦6 |
| 168005282 (Comments: 2) | PropertyVIEW® (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hello! Sure! Well noted. We advised the team to do it. commented 2025-07-14 09:03:29 UTC by PropertyVIEW® ♦7 |
| 168572991 (Comments: 2) | Kloof (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por el apunte. Las elevaciones que añadí vienen del GPS de mi móvil, así que es posible que no sean del todo precisas en altitud. Si el ráster del IGN tiene datos más fiables, por supuesto, se p... commented 2025-07-14 08:59:49 UTC by Kloof ♦2 |
| 168866572 (Comments: 1) | Lockstar (Discussed changesets: 60) | Transperth's Spatial Data tells who's operating with those bus routes around areas in Perth and its regional areas. https://www.transperth.wa.gov.au/About/Spatial-Data-Access commented 2025-07-14 08:47:41 UTC by shinjiman ♦20 |
| 168796601 (Comments: 1) | michalgy (Discussed changesets: 9) | Cześć, rzeczywiście jest tu znak, który uzasadniałby dodanie bicycle=designated? A jeśli jest, to jaki? Bo highway=footway + bicycle=designated wygląda jak mapowanie niezgodne z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pie... commented 2025-07-14 08:45:21 UTC by YomanNH ♦309 |
| 164810806 (Comments: 2) | Paolo pn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao, è un errore di mappatura, ho appena rimosso la chiave. Grazie per la segnalazione. commented 2025-07-14 08:42:10 UTC by Paolo pn ♦2 |
| 166694798 (Comments: 3) | qrisztly (Discussed changesets: 4) | Har nu fjernet den store campingplads. commented 2025-07-14 08:40:36 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦82 |
| 167939377 (Comments: 3) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 21) | Revertiert, da keine Antwort von LaLinea und Hausnummern vor Ort nicht vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168903877 commented 2025-07-14 08:14:25 UTC by Rainero ♦583 |
| 168890586 (Comments: 1) | Phef2137 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zmiana została wycofana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168894122 Jaki był powód zamiany granicy administracyjnej w tak uwielbiany przez wielu temat jak highway=trunk inny, niż trolling? commented 2025-07-14 08:13:34 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦130 |
| 168409039 (Comments: 7) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 290) | Zakończenie drogi rowerowej schodami nie oznacza, że na całym odcinku nie obowiązuje z niej korzystanie — Kodeks Ruchu Drogowego nie przewiduje takiego wyjątku. Jeśli droga dla rowerów biegnie równolegle do jezdni, to zgodni... commented 2025-07-14 08:09:59 UTC by Asteliks ♦53 |
| 168690494 (Comments: 5) | fmc_6 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ist ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168903305 commented 2025-07-14 07:56:49 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,862 |
 | 167679913 (Comments: 1) | Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (Discussed changesets: 4) | hallo. pada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395662059#map=19/-7.610772/110.643085 anda mengedit jalan tetapi jalan di sekitarnya menjadi tidak tersambung dengan jalan utama nya. sedikit sharing, jika ingin mengedit sesuati pastikan jalan di sekit... commented 2025-07-14 07:52:41 UTC by f_husni ♦42 |
| 167983943 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Hughes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Andrew, what is the reasoning behind topologically joining the culvert to the Hume Freeway near Greta Road? commented 2025-07-14 07:48:01 UTC by AntBurnett ♦17 |
| 168902639 (Comments: 1) | Dawg Wantsome (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 07:42:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168822568 (Comments: 1) | user_16522352 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Please don't do mass undiscussed changes of `old_name*=` to `name=` and other `*_name=` commented 2025-07-14 07:38:11 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,543 |
 | 168414147 (Comments: 2) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | Please go ahead and revert @Puxan, these buildings dont exist at all and there is no explanation for them --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168414147 ... commented 2025-07-14 07:37:43 UTC by Kateregga1 ♦17 |
| 168902316 (Comments: 1) | Dawg Wantsome (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 07:33:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168893928 (Comments: 1) | Eggyn0mus (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, please correct opening_hours https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12998194241 commented 2025-07-14 07:31:01 UTC by Filip009 ♦944 |
| 168857272 (Comments: 1) | user_16522352 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Please don't add historical names with no relevance in existing public use as `name=` in OSM. Add them to OpenHistoricalMap. commented 2025-07-14 07:30:46 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,543 |
| 168622381 (Comments: 1) | Iwo Grajoszek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Czy aby na pewno na całym odcinku tor powinien być oznaczony jako disused? Prace prowadzone są bliżej dawnego PDTu a po drodze przy al. Prymasa mamy Zakład Energetyki Trakcyjnej i Torów, który na 99% nie został na 3 tygodnie odci... commented 2025-07-14 07:30:03 UTC by domi_nick ♦6 |
 | 168573323 (Comments: 2) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | Changeset to be reverted --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168573323 commented 2025-07-14 07:22:09 UTC by Kateregga1 ♦17 |
| 168573447 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | Residential Road in the middle of nowhere, not connected to any other road, changeset to be reverted --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168573447 ... commented 2025-07-14 07:19:15 UTC by Kateregga1 ♦17 |
| 168885735 (Comments: 2) | GArUnE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Foi uma alteração acidental. Faço pequenas alterações mesmo para melhorar o mapa. Rui commented 2025-07-14 07:08:40 UTC by GArUnE ♦1 |
| 168574326 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | Changeset to be reverted, fixtional forests that are not visible in the satellite imagery --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168574326 commented 2025-07-14 07:08:18 UTC by Kateregga1 ♦17 |
| 168577088 (Comments: 2) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | Changeset to be reverted, the mapper created many fixtional very tiny non existed small buildings each with 300 nodes. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168577... commented 2025-07-14 07:06:50 UTC by Kateregga1 ♦17 |
| 168577111 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | Changeset to be reverted, tiny non existed small builings mapped each with 300 nodes --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168577111 commented 2025-07-14 07:04:36 UTC by Kateregga1 ♦17 |
| 168898503 (Comments: 1) | NSPSP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OSM. In this changeset you accidentally dragged this fence node 670m to a footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8200436876/history/2 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/82004... commented 2025-07-14 06:52:22 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦28 |
| 168263899 (Comments: 1) | osm_sense (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo osm_sense, DaisyDuck erwähnte Deine Eintragung im Forum. Ich habe dort darauf reagiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/steinverbauung-im-fluss-zur-geschwindigkeitsreduktion/131679/30 Viele Grüße Ro... commented 2025-07-14 06:44:32 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦724 |
| 160935057 (Comments: 2) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi sef43, thank you for reaching out. TomTom proprietary GPS traces show no vehicle movement in the last month between nodes 327216001 and 327216037, suggesting the road segment is not yet operational. Moreover, A28: Ersatzneubau einer Brücke... commented 2025-07-14 06:35:19 UTC by Kaduna ♦20 |
| 168900411 (Comments: 1) | espressocapital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 06:27:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168889901 (Comments: 3) | hamiltont_nova_Import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional. commented 2025-07-14 06:19:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,396 |
| 168889893 (Comments: 2) | hamiltont_nova_Import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional. commented 2025-07-14 06:19:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,396 |
| 168620390 (Comments: 1) | hamiltont_nova_Import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168889901 commented 2025-07-14 06:18:23 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,396 |
| 168899738 (Comments: 1) | precisionsandi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 06:03:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168697471 (Comments: 2) | Mati_informatyk (Discussed changesets: 3) | already corrected, it was deleted by mistake commented 2025-07-14 05:55:43 UTC by taxi301 ♦85 |
 | 167215293 (Comments: 3) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 105) | Szia! Pontosan ugyanezt mondom, amit te. Eddig volt önálló pont a falurész központjában: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6282467219 Látszik a módosításcsomagodban, h... commented 2025-07-14 05:48:16 UTC by Bandi_ ♦8 |
| 168337892 (Comments: 1) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, is the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411081335 - roundabout? commented 2025-07-14 05:47:19 UTC by Sanniu ♦571 |
| 168899333 (Comments: 1) | Wiseguysbarbers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 05:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168897332 (Comments: 1) | MobiusModding (Discussed changesets: 1) | the change looks okay, just https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414558740 should be highway=service + service=driveway rather than unclassified which is generally for a public road rather than a driveway leading to a house. Not sure what you me... commented 2025-07-14 05:15:37 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
 | 168898468 (Comments: 1) | Yan Aung Htut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Yan Aung Htut, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment fi... commented 2025-07-14 05:06:25 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168879228 (Comments: 3) | mataharimau (Discussed changesets: 11) | Sorry, the museum is still there. You replaced most polygons with a relation. While I personally think that this makes changing the map harder in the future it is a viable approach, I suppose. Still some residential polygons got deleted. commented 2025-07-14 04:46:38 UTC by rene78 ♦447 |
| 168898030 (Comments: 1) | curtsingerelectric (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-14 04:30:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168862621 (Comments: 6) | aaei924 (Discussed changesets: 14) | 1. 안내지도의 문제점 지적에 관해 1-1. 안내지도는 진짜 업데이트가 안 된 것인가? 도로명 지정 고시가 도로의 최신 개통 추세를 따라가지 못하는 점은 인정합니다만, 안내지도는 고시... commented 2025-07-14 03:44:32 UTC by aaei924 ♦20 |
| 168894701 (Comments: 2) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, thanks for checking! I've got another project to work on so feel free to take over. Have fun! Max commented 2025-07-14 03:25:57 UTC by maxwellward ♦2 |
| 159631066 (Comments: 3) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 105) | I'm not sure and I see what you mean as it is likely part of the bicycle route but apart from that it doesn't seem to have any other features that would indicate it's a cycleway or shared path, it looks and functions more as a walkway,... commented 2025-07-14 02:40:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 166752306 (Comments: 1) | pole pole (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Pole Pole, There are a few things that I see could be done better in this changeset. It was a good idea to copy and paste footprints; this could have been applied to the inner and outer ways of the multipolygons too. Read this diary https://www.op... commented 2025-07-14 02:25:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168895475 (Comments: 1) | TereseWilcock123456789 (Discussed changesets: 4) | the waterway needed to be split here so that the section could be removed, I checked over this in JOSM and repaired the boundary relation commented 2025-07-14 02:20:23 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 168860199 (Comments: 1) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 17) | I changed these to better match what the transport agency use as it's more akin to the route name rather than the "MODE: FROM => TO" format. commented 2025-07-14 01:22:23 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 168667548 (Comments: 1) | Micharl (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is incorrect. Please refer to: https://gis.data.mass.gov/maps/5088c1b6af16420e98f1165d051d60df Under state specific guidelines, Massachusetts has a classification standard. MassGIS F-Class 2 = highway=trunk MassGIS F-Class 3 ... commented 2025-07-14 01:10:17 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦109 |
| 168822780 (Comments: 1) | kore_welle (Discussed changesets: 5) | Take care to ensure that your highways follow the centre of the road visible in imagery, especially in dense populated areas becasue they could overlap other features which have not been mapped yet. I haven't check thouroughly but your tagging o... commented 2025-07-14 01:05:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168822850 (Comments: 1) | kore_welle (Discussed changesets: 5) | Highways and landuse areas should not share nodes: hold alt while mapping to prevent this. The highways I flagged overlap but do not share a common node: the junction is invalid and routing software will not recognise it as such. Take care that you c... commented 2025-07-14 00:54:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168835974 (Comments: 1) | Filip Flajzar (Discussed changesets: 1) | you can use bridge=boardwalk rather than bridge=yes for a boardwalk. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge=boardwalk commented 2025-07-14 00:53:44 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 168822626 (Comments: 1) | kore_welle (Discussed changesets: 5) | Invalid building tagging; I addressed it. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you a... commented 2025-07-14 00:50:07 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
 | 168706806 (Comments: 4) | aakkkaa (Discussed changesets: 8) | хм, ладно, удалю кусок от 9б. странно они его повели, однако, хотя по полю проще commented 2025-07-14 00:49:26 UTC by 4004 ♦1,888 |
| 155804787 (Comments: 1) | Thomas_vlieghe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes the foot tag was "no" because pedestrians are not allowed to walk along the western side of the bridge. The no pedestrian sign at the bottom of the steps indicates this https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=330705058471263 The step... commented 2025-07-14 00:46:31 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 168665188 (Comments: 1) | Minigeek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I recommend that these be updated as driveways/parking, not regular service roads. commented 2025-07-14 00:29:52 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦109 |
| 168893009 (Comments: 4) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 117) | Mój błąd, źle spojrzałem :) commented 2025-07-14 00:11:14 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,060 |
| 168874925 (Comments: 1) | Iwo Grajoszek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Te zmiany niestety są niepoprawne. Wycofałem i poprawiłem. Nie dodawaj działającej sygnalizacji jak jeszcze nie istnieje tym bardziej duplikując węzły, które już to oznaczały w stanie proposed. Czekałem z tym do ponie... commented 2025-07-14 00:04:51 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,060 |
| 168753218 (Comments: 4) | acubens71 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Okay, I'm sorry, I must admit that this wasn't nice of me to say you were a bot, I shouldn't have reacted on a whim. Nonetheless it believe it would be appropriate to check what the regular contributions from the user are before... commented 2025-07-14 00:02:46 UTC by acubens71 ♦31 |
| 168687849 (Comments: 1) | Panio (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, approaches to roundabouts use the ordinary road types, and not the "_link" variants. commented 2025-07-13 23:11:52 UTC by ika-chan! ♦245 |
| 168727641 (Comments: 1) | hujkhol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please use descriptive changesets comments. I ask this because we recently dealt with a mapper who left bad changeset comments while making problematic edits, and made numerous accounts to get around the blocks. --- ... commented 2025-07-13 22:59:58 UTC by ika-chan! ♦245 |
| 168870359 (Comments: 1) | JEK-Melih (Discussed changesets: 1) | Haritada gözükmediği her zaman orada olmadığı anlamına gelmez. Bing ile bakarsanız orada havuz bulunmakta. Geri alıyorum. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168893018 commented 2025-07-13 22:37:18 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦4 |
| 168892790 (Comments: 1) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-07-13 22:31:45 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 167177901 (Comments: 1) | Cdut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Du scheinst da ausversehen einen Fussweg verzerrt zu haben, bitte versuche das in Zukunft zu vermeiden https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168892879 commented 2025-07-13 22:29:48 UTC by nleanba ♦20 |
| 168865085 (Comments: 1) | mamiysr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, Site içerisindeki yol için isim yazmanıza gerek yok. Akkent Sitesi olarak bir apartment complex (landuse=residental, residental=apartments) alanı çizebilirsiniz ve adını Akkent Sitesi koyabilirsiniz. ht... commented 2025-07-13 22:23:02 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦4 |
| 168888792 (Comments: 1) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 33) | Edits in Hürstwald except bugfixed rail commented 2025-07-13 22:12:13 UTC by Makeena ♦35 |
| 168891966 (Comments: 1) | Cy0nyx_PL (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-07-13 22:01:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168891861 (Comments: 1) | MaciejSs (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-07-13 21:50:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168886905 (Comments: 1) | sebaver01 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. no usamos contracciones en OSM. Por favor usar las palabras completas. Avenida en vez de Av. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168886905 commented 2025-07-13 21:48:31 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 168822091 (Comments: 1) | kore_welle (Discussed changesets: 5) | See my resolution in Changeset: 168891669. Accuracy is important when mapping; quality is much more desirable than quantity. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. You can see how I mapped these footprints in the affore mentioned... commented 2025-07-13 21:36:21 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168854720 (Comments: 1) | Schank Group LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | This should be tagged as Permissive access=permissive bicycle=permissive foot=permissive highway=path horse=no motor_vehicle=no name=Boardwalk Trail commented 2025-07-13 21:31:36 UTC by Ezra Jenks ♦6 |
| 168885781 (Comments: 1) | NicoCampi69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. El tag building= es para estructuras, no para los recintos completos. commented 2025-07-13 21:27:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 168822395 (Comments: 1) | kore_welle (Discussed changesets: 5) | The building footprints you added were incorrectly tagged with the value river: I resolved the invalid tagging error. The footprints you mapped were inaccurate. The project you're working on requests the mapping of highways and waterways; please... commented 2025-07-13 21:27:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168891282 (Comments: 1) | grochuu (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-07-13 21:21:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
 | 168700844 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168891384 commented 2025-07-13 21:20:36 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168700552 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168891384 commented 2025-07-13 21:20:36 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168700434 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168891384 commented 2025-07-13 21:20:35 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168700319 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168891384 commented 2025-07-13 21:20:35 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168700463 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168891384 commented 2025-07-13 21:20:35 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168699676 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168891384 commented 2025-07-13 21:20:35 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168700170 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168891384 commented 2025-07-13 21:20:35 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 166705185 (Comments: 1) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi kannst du mal hier schauen ? Danke https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4854004 commented 2025-07-13 20:53:36 UTC by limes11 ♦892 |
| 168403237 (Comments: 1) | tgdl (Discussed changesets: 1) | You correctly identified buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are inaccurate (oversized). You reduced the accuracy of some existing footprints. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. Please keep this feedback in... commented 2025-07-13 20:45:49 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168361808 (Comments: 4) | KlopanRin (Discussed changesets: 17) | It matters insofar as all these interactions and utterances are public, and new OSM contributors might shy away from joining a project that appears to have unhinged people run wild. commented 2025-07-13 20:36:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,430 |
 | 165147756 (Comments: 1) | raphaelmirc (Discussed changesets: 38) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452501196 essa via não deveria ter sido transformada em track commented 2025-07-13 20:32:04 UTC by erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,973 |
| 168889902 (Comments: 1) | fuguru (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-07-13 20:30:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168273134 (Comments: 4) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 107) | nice ;) commented 2025-07-13 20:22:45 UTC by vmicho ♦76 |
| 168174765 (Comments: 3) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hallo, ich habe den Namen "Trampolin" gelöscht. Viele Grüße commented 2025-07-13 20:17:48 UTC by SG86 ♦9 |
| 168889317 (Comments: 1) | masakratownik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', &#... commented 2025-07-13 20:11:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 164815535 (Comments: 1) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 72) | dlaczego zmiana na greenfield? przecież to są tereny zalewowe a nie przyszłe inwestycyjne commented 2025-07-13 20:09:56 UTC by grelus ♦153 |
| 164203713 (Comments: 2) | Toni Serra (Discussed changesets: 80) | Possiblement a la carretera hi figura "Tunel de Bono", ara no ho se, vaig canviar el nom perque és el que figura a la cartografia de l'ICGC. Salut. commented 2025-07-13 19:59:43 UTC by Toni Serra ♦7 |
| 88873897 (Comments: 3) | AhmadHB (Discussed changesets: 31) | Let that Persian-speaking <1% exist peacefully. They just want to know the name of that store. commented 2025-07-13 19:55:06 UTC by KlopanRin ♦27 |
| 168888225 (Comments: 2) | MarsellusR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! M. commented 2025-07-13 19:46:58 UTC by MarsellusR ♦1 |
| 168042162 (Comments: 1) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 166) | Hallo wermak, nicht alle *_link an Ein- und Ausfahrten von Kreisverkehren sind falsch und gehören entfernt. Wenn eine tatsächliche Auffahrt an einen Kreisverkehr anschließt, dann gehört da auch *_link an die Auffahrt. Siehe: http... commented 2025-07-13 19:45:19 UTC by Mammi71 ♦253 |
| 168876927 (Comments: 1) | adrianmg13 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hola adrian, Nombrar un bosque (wood) y unos matorrales (scrub) con el nombre de la montaña o de la sierra no es correcto. La montaña ya tiene su propia etiqueta (natural=peak) y, tanto el Tossal Redó como el Tossal... commented 2025-07-13 19:29:18 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,628 |
| 168887622 (Comments: 1) | charl3s (Discussed changesets: 176) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12997923519 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-07-13 19:22:27 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168887402 (Comments: 1) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-07-13 19:22:20 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168841242 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 184) | Alrighty then. I'll change it back. commented 2025-07-13 19:19:41 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦51 |
| 168883146 (Comments: 1) | HRoy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Moin :) zwei Kleingkeiten, die öfter auftauchen: Neigung kannst du direkt "X%" eintragen. Wenn es in Pfeilrichtung des Weges bergab geht, dann "-X%". Das Datum der letzten Überprüfung wird, wie jede... commented 2025-07-13 19:08:52 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168812730 (Comments: 1) | Corey Fonseca (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Corey, another little tip: If something is pretty square in reality you can square the OSM object by using the "Q"-key on your keyboard. Try it with this roof of yours :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414151526 chee... commented 2025-07-13 19:05:04 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168575367 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 44) | It's alright! I went ahead and re-added it to the boundary relation. commented 2025-07-13 18:46:17 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦51 |
| 168878455 (Comments: 3) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ich habe die Änderung zurückgesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168886413 commented 2025-07-13 18:43:21 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦12 |
| 168880741 (Comments: 1) | NewChest (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, Thanks for adding missing houses. However, I want to inform you that we never trace building structures from aerial imagery in Belgium. Governments provide detailed numerical imagery showing the correct outline of every bu... commented 2025-07-13 18:38:30 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 168729023 (Comments: 2) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 87) | Rozwiń myśl, bo droga spełnia wymagania pod kątem m. in. bezkolizyjności i dostępu, a także łączy się z innym trunk. commented 2025-07-13 18:31:11 UTC by theDM ♦91 |
| 168878457 (Comments: 2) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 9) | du hast recht. den separaten radweg habe ich beim bearbeiten in SCEE übersehen. Danke für wiederherstellen. commented 2025-07-13 18:29:35 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦12 |
| 132425482 (Comments: 5) | matheusgomesms (Discussed changesets: 12) | uma boa commented 2025-07-13 18:27:12 UTC by erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,973 |
| 167079471 (Comments: 3) | Didi131 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi :) dann muss es irgendwo ein techn. Problem gegeben haben, da hier in dieser Diskussion ja keine Antwort von dir vorhanden ist und in meinem DM-Postfach ist auch keine Nachricht von dir. Aber egal, zur Sache: Danke, dass du dich meld... commented 2025-07-13 18:15:33 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 158433537 (Comments: 3) | Kioska Journo (Discussed changesets: 9) | No problem! I found it doing a big change from railway=preserved to railway:preserved=yes commented 2025-07-13 18:15:24 UTC by IIVQ ♦136 |
| 168884940 (Comments: 1) | Alexmol (Discussed changesets: 22) | Actualização de postos de carregamento, não de antenas commented 2025-07-13 18:04:23 UTC by Alexmol ♦92 |
| 168881845 (Comments: 2) | barte (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. Still a work in progress. commented 2025-07-13 17:44:29 UTC by barte ♦2 |
| 168623083 (Comments: 1) | Electos (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, and thank you for your building additions to Daliat el Carmel. It appears that you're not creating buildings with right angles. Please note that pressing Q will create 90 degrees angles and this is usually desired. Second, i... commented 2025-07-13 17:44:07 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦623 |
| 168751664 (Comments: 2) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 50) | 👍 commented 2025-07-13 17:39:56 UTC by AurélienQ ♦125 |
| 165296927 (Comments: 1) | wkLeon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, why was the node for Goodsprings merged with the boundary? This completely removes the label from appearing on the map. commented 2025-07-13 17:39:18 UTC by Joseph R P ♦353 |
| 168874877 (Comments: 1) | gncrK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Klasę dróg oznaczamy tagiem highway:class:pl i tyle. commented 2025-07-13 17:31:48 UTC by pavvv ♦498 |
| 168881981 (Comments: 1) | Vipero86 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-07-13 17:31:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168576649 (Comments: 1) | valtin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Merci de votre contribution à OpenStreetMap ! Cet edit ajoute beaucoup d'adresses invalides (manque de tag 'addr:street', mauvais usage de 'addr:unit' pour indiquer les bis et ter qui devraient &... commented 2025-07-13 17:14:33 UTC by Everteal ♦2 |
| 163705205 (Comments: 2) | Ratushniak (Discussed changesets: 1) | This edit contains some flaws, I have fixed them commented 2025-07-13 16:47:05 UTC by anti-caveman ♦15 |
| 168865273 (Comments: 3) | LovelyPL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Jakiś czas temu w nocy wyłapałem komunikat o zamknięciu mostu na drugim końcu Polski i go zamknąłem na mapie a brakowało paru godzin do faktycznego zamknięcia to się larum podniosło, że za wcześnie a już parę ruchów edycyjnych t... commented 2025-07-13 16:40:01 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦465 |
| 168840867 (Comments: 2) | Peter Elderson (Discussed changesets: 108) | Thanks! I seem to have copied part of a hiking route into the tags. I'm suprprised JOSM didn't complain about unusual tags. I'll repair it. commented 2025-07-13 16:39:10 UTC by Peter Elderson ♦149 |
| 166749135 (Comments: 1) | Tonyfarms (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi again here you deleted a cemetery. Why that? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166749135 commented 2025-07-13 16:27:21 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168871663 (Comments: 1) | Hanniii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi nochmal Hanniii, danke für's Eintragen von dem Stand. Ich hab das Tagging etwas verbessert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414426092 "landuse=farmyard" wird hauptsächlich für kompletten Bauernhö... commented 2025-07-13 16:23:15 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦255 |
| 168873549 (Comments: 3) | Corey Fonseca (Discussed changesets: 2) | You're welcome. The wiki has documentation on many things. Maybe this page helps as a starter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a have a good one commented 2025-07-13 16:22:28 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 166403971 (Comments: 1) | Vodevil_Mark (Discussed changesets: 4) | Czy ustawienie na punktach nadmiarowego tagu toll:bus to sabotaż? Way ma ustawionego tego taga! commented 2025-07-13 16:16:47 UTC by Mariusz Dykierek ♦28 |
| X | 81618931 (Comments: 1) | Florimondable (Discussed changesets: 59) | hello, can you explain why you added on "name=North Sea / Nordsee / Noordzee / Nordsøen / Nordsjøen / Mer du Nord" when there's name:* in multiple languages? or alt_names. commented 2025-07-13 16:10:52 UTC by NunoCaldeira ♦554 |
| 167122945 (Comments: 2) | Seelenfresser82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168880507 commented 2025-07-13 16:07:59 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168680768 (Comments: 2) | Jhowie_Nitnek (Discussed changesets: 182) | Hi, I don't know what you mean, I added on the Princes Elisabeth Island not the North Sea commented 2025-07-13 16:03:21 UTC by Jhowie_Nitnek ♦181 |
| 163167923 (Comments: 4) | abester (Discussed changesets: 22) | fixed it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168880187 do not connect highways and waterways if there is not really a ford there. commented 2025-07-13 16:00:37 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 116864051 (Comments: 1) | Weiden (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Weiden, Wege die so existieren einfach zu löschen entspricht nicht wirklich dem Vorgehen auf OSM. Wenn die Wege privat sind, dann sollten sie stattdessen mit access=private gekennzeichnet werden. Das Löschen führt letzt... commented 2025-07-13 16:00:30 UTC by Hedaja ♦135 |
| 168835523 (Comments: 2) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 55) | Ah, thanks for catching that. That was supposed to be name:wanman as tagged in the duplicated lake I deleted in this changeset. According to ISO 639-3 it should be name:wbt so I'll change it to that. Best regards, Taya Snijder commented 2025-07-13 15:56:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168879388 (Comments: 1) | Psztomol (Discussed changesets: 76) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782728217 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-07-13 15:51:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 105692887 (Comments: 1) | slymarekivan (Discussed changesets: 27) | Tvar tych luk by bolo nacim opravit. Pochybujem, ze ESRI World Imagery ich ukazuje ako perfektne kruhy, navyse vsetky s rovnakym polomerom! Tato pripominka plati aj pre ine luky v okoli, ktore ste do mapy pridali. commented 2025-07-13 15:43:35 UTC by laznik ♦80 |
| 164867187 (Comments: 13) | Sofia_111 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The plans will be, yeah commented 2025-07-13 15:35:00 UTC by Sofia_111 ♦2 |
| 168878749 (Comments: 1) | AlexTheOne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bing map aerial is outdated commented 2025-07-13 15:29:23 UTC by AlexTheOne ♦1 |
| 168876904 (Comments: 2) | Jaka Kranjc (Discussed changesets: 5) | I don't know where inside it is located and the wiki gave this as an option. commented 2025-07-13 15:25:15 UTC by Jaka Kranjc ♦6 |
| 168848644 (Comments: 1) | yinef12012 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, why did you delete a dental office here? The amount of edits all across the US looks like some commercial project. Please read and follow the https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines and the https://w... commented 2025-07-13 15:19:26 UTC by mueschel ♦6,574 |
| 168877578 (Comments: 1) | scareddragon (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-07-13 15:10:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168863636 (Comments: 1) | Der Troisdorfer (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hallo Norbert! Schön wieder mal von Dir zu hören! Aber kannst Du mir sagen was Du mit den Schlüssel (siehe https://www.osm.org/node/12996988076) meinst: neu = Crataegus monogyna 'Stricta' no = 3735 ? commented 2025-07-13 15:09:55 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168876809 (Comments: 1) | Psztomol (Discussed changesets: 76) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. "Wola Cygowska": https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-07-13 14:51:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 129256385 (Comments: 2) | Elias Sjögreen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lite sent svar, men jag tror* (2 år sedan nu, så lite osäker) att jag tänkte att dessa vägar var avsedda för lekcyklarna som fanns att låna i parkleken och därmed mappade jag dom som cykelväg. Nu i efte... commented 2025-07-13 14:46:31 UTC by Elias Sjögreen ♦1 |
| 168875630 (Comments: 1) | noahdoersing (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Autocompletion has messed up the changeset description, should just be "Update".) commented 2025-07-13 14:16:12 UTC by noahdoersing ♦3 |
| 168870195 (Comments: 1) | Hanniii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Hanniii, herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Danke, dass du die Karte aktualisierst und verbesserst! Bist du dir bei der Hausnummer ganz sicher? Ich glaube, das war schon richtig so, wenn von Nord nach Süd durchgezählt wi... commented 2025-07-13 14:05:04 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦255 |
| 168785252 (Comments: 2) | alsper78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Chiedo scusa e ti ringrazio, vedo che hai già corretto. Mi sono confuso con il confine Italia-Svizzera commented 2025-07-13 13:43:35 UTC by alsper78 ♦1 |
| 164393251 (Comments: 1) | Henri Pradeau (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour! Vous a changé quelques pieces de ce ligne de chemen de fer en railway=preserved. Ce tag est deprecé, maintenant on utilise railway:preserved=yes : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:preserved Je l'ai d&eac... commented 2025-07-13 13:25:12 UTC by IIVQ ♦136 |
| 167502493 (Comments: 4) | NatalieVvln (Discussed changesets: 1) | Да, к сожалению ПКК запрещают коммерческое использование - и поэтому не разрешен в осм. Ваш редактор, возможно, базируется на российско... commented 2025-07-13 13:20:33 UTC by 4004 ♦1,888 |
| 168872470 (Comments: 1) | os-emmer (Discussed changesets: 48) | Der Kommentar ist falsch. Es hätte "Eintragen Imbiss" heißen sollen. commented 2025-07-13 13:06:23 UTC by os-emmer ♦340 |
| 168868463 (Comments: 3) | meg_map (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dann muss es erstmal so bleiben, bis jmd vorbei kommt und guckt commented 2025-07-13 13:04:21 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
 | 168842961 (Comments: 1) | Harzer123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi there any reason why you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/268486847 from railway=stop to railway=station? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168842961 ... commented 2025-07-13 12:29:35 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 167971101 (Comments: 5) | Flayer (Discussed changesets: 63) | Thanks, good to know. commented 2025-07-13 12:16:51 UTC by Flayer ♦41 |
| 168713757 (Comments: 7) | Mark from Krefeld (Discussed changesets: 11) | @Znaika Das ist halt falsch. Wie ich oben gesagt habe: access=agricultural (oder forestry) sind in (über) 99% der Fälle falsch gesetzt. Die genannten VZ beziehen sich ausschließlich auf Fahrzeuge (laut StVo auch auf Fahrr&au... commented 2025-07-13 12:07:48 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 149915743 (Comments: 3) | mappinglander (Discussed changesets: 21) | evet, HGM'de öyle yazıyor. Sitedeki notları tarayınca bir şey çıkmadı. o zaman HGM'den geçirmişim 🤦♂️ commented 2025-07-13 12:07:09 UTC by mappinglander ♦99 |
| 168857156 (Comments: 1) | eclipzea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between email and website. The domain for the email is catalystcannabis.co (without minus and only co) and for the website is catalyst-cannabis.com (with minus and com). Unfortunately, I cannot check t... commented 2025-07-13 11:59:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168856916 (Comments: 2) | topolusitania (Discussed changesets: 80) | Gracias. Los datos em mi tabla, estan asi: Nome\t Número Tipo\t Latitude\t Longitude\tAltitude Município\tInício funcionamento Vila Real de S.António... commented 2025-07-13 11:42:58 UTC by topolusitania ♦219 |
| 168756234 (Comments: 1) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 7) | ⚡️ so fast commented 2025-07-13 11:40:44 UTC by stillhart ♦155 |
| 124547444 (Comments: 5) | VA00 (Discussed changesets: 142) | juz dalem height tak troche dla beki, ale i tak to slabe bo wieza wysokosci metra to rownie dobrze mozna babki z piasku tagowac tower height=0.1... to ozdobne slupki i tyle, przeciez nie tagujesz rzezby lwa na bramie jak ktos sobie gipsowy pazdzierz ... commented 2025-07-13 11:25:23 UTC by stary kalosz ♦5 |
| 168813834 (Comments: 3) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 285) | A w tagu note jest napisane, że takiej informacji nie ma. Spodziewam się, że taka informacja jest i z tego powodu utworzono uwagę. commented 2025-07-13 11:15:37 UTC by pavvv ♦498 |
| 168860145 (Comments: 2) | Steffen Schneider (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke sehr. Interessanterweise war das ein paar Jahre lang falsch. ;) commented 2025-07-13 11:12:55 UTC by Steffen Schneider ♦1 |
| 146984447 (Comments: 6) | gebux (Discussed changesets: 47) | Ich habe das jetzt überarbeitet und hoffe, das trifft die Lage einigermaßen. commented 2025-07-13 11:12:29 UTC by wolfbert ♦109 |
| 168850470 (Comments: 1) | WendyPaalvast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-13 10:53:33 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
 | 168783567 (Comments: 1) | FavourTaiwo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. A remark. It is not necessary to map every single piece of farmland. Just map the circumstance and the canals (not the individual ditches) See also the comments in the comment section of the projec... commented 2025-07-13 10:35:15 UTC by Frans S ♦9,821 |
| 168816295 (Comments: 1) | ThomasDoorn95 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-13 10:33:07 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168866851 (Comments: 1) | UrbanAlchemist (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-13 10:30:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168866773 (Comments: 1) | Autoprofis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-13 10:30:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168811828 (Comments: 1) | wrnalert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-13 10:28:51 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168805650 (Comments: 1) | Rob Hoekstra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-13 10:26:32 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168784490 (Comments: 1) | MariusKompas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-13 10:24:17 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168784050 (Comments: 2) | carlitoon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Carlitoon, Alle begin is moeilijk. In NL taggen we de bedrijfsgegevens op de address-node en niet op het gebouw. Ik zie dat 2 andere mappers de data al hebben overgebracht naar die address-node, dus je hoeft niets meer aan te passen. commented 2025-07-13 10:21:54 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168002682 (Comments: 1) | MC79 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ahoj, FYI konečně máme podklad, se kterým by se ta pěšina - serpentina nahoru k Shillerově rozhledně dala uspokojivě zpřesnit - viz: https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c4241 a https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c4183#mfe1f... commented 2025-07-13 10:16:05 UTC by VladaC ♦33 |
| 168866021 (Comments: 1) | Psztomol (Discussed changesets: 76) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3832392345 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-07-13 10:10:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168856249 (Comments: 1) | Skywave (Discussed changesets: 30) | Dag Skywave, In je commentaar geef je aan dat de middenweg open is. In de changeset verwijder je de highway van die weg en dus zit de hele zaak op slot. Alle routerelaties van het OV zijn nu kapot. Dus mijn grote vraag: Hoe kunnen de busse... commented 2025-07-13 10:09:11 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
 | 168865225 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 99) | Използвани и снимки от Bing и Mapillary commented 2025-07-13 09:41:35 UTC by Fraxi ♦130 |
| 168864449 (Comments: 1) | Psztomol (Discussed changesets: 76) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9580156027 https://www.op... commented 2025-07-13 09:20:45 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168638917 (Comments: 1) | tandr88 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Szia! Mi szerepel az utcatáblán? Tamás commented 2025-07-13 08:40:04 UTC by vasony ♦500 |
| 168765665 (Comments: 1) | gnoye (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello , I have a question You mapped canals here from south west - north east. Also canals west-east without connecting them to the canal southwest - north east. I think, difficult to see, that there should be a culvert to make it possible that... commented 2025-07-13 08:27:21 UTC by Frans S ♦9,821 |
| 165830440 (Comments: 4) | Engelhaft (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you cannot mark it as a parcel shop then such a tag would be closest to what it is, thanks. commented 2025-07-13 08:14:23 UTC by Engelhaft ♦1 |
| 167841078 (Comments: 2) | Gumball3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Achso, ich wollte noch schreiben, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley hier siehst du, was bei OSM mit "alley" gemeint ist :) commented 2025-07-13 08:14:09 UTC by Negreheb ♦263 |
| 168558888 (Comments: 1) | gerdesk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a guest house or campsite? The website does not mention anything about camping. commented 2025-07-13 08:13:53 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦82 |
| 168859240 (Comments: 2) | Umka_007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for your private message. commented 2025-07-13 08:12:57 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
 | 168855889 (Comments: 2) | KennyDap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional. commented 2025-07-13 08:12:16 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168841672 (Comments: 1) | Gwenedad (Discussed changesets: 1) | #DeletionsCheck Hi, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions. Could you please confirm if these deletions were i... commented 2025-07-13 08:11:22 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 167959548 (Comments: 1) | Gumball3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey Gumball3000, ich kann verstehen, dass man den Zaun eintragen will mit "access=no" aber das ist eher dafür gedacht, wenn da NIEMAND hin kann oder darf. Ich nehme aber an, dass die Bewohner hier schon aufs Grundstück dürfen... commented 2025-07-13 08:08:01 UTC by Negreheb ♦263 |
| 167628486 (Comments: 1) | Gumball3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Servus Gumball3000, hier hast du ein Gebäude gelöscht - welches du nacher zwar wieder eingetragen hast, aber mit weniger Infos als vorher, dafür mit doppelter Adresse. Ich würde das wieder rückgängig machen. Der Name auf... commented 2025-07-13 08:05:35 UTC by Negreheb ♦263 |
| 167825496 (Comments: 1) | Gumball3000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Servus, du hast hier die Straße umbenannt und den parkplatz ebenfalls, das ist leider Falsch. Vielleicht wolltest du ja einfach nur eine private Notiz machen oder so? "Delivery Drivers Nightmare - The Worst Street" aber das geh&ou... commented 2025-07-13 08:02:39 UTC by Negreheb ♦263 |
| 159237547 (Comments: 1) | yangseojun (Discussed changesets: 2) | footpritns of individual buildings should be tagged with building=* and so likely beyond the scope of the project you were working on. Try to see if a simple shape will suffice when mapping buildings before more unique options. Please keep this feedb... commented 2025-07-13 08:02:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168796239 (Comments: 1) | Nicola Labbrozzi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Nicola and welcome to OSM. Note the warnings in your edit set "warnings:impossible_oneway:highway" & "warnings:outdated_tags:incomplete_tags". You've created impossible routing for vehicles with a smalll drivewa... commented 2025-07-13 07:46:57 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,435 |
 | 168860844 (Comments: 2) | Skinsense (Discussed changesets: 1) | Skinsense Laser & Medical Aesthetics offer professional skin care and related aesthetic services to both men and women. commented 2025-07-13 07:36:25 UTC by Skinsense ♦1 |
| 168861058 (Comments: 1) | Ponderosopine (Discussed changesets: 7) | Updated, not upper commented 2025-07-13 07:10:00 UTC by Ponderosopine ♦8 |
| 168795493 (Comments: 1) | K9itkg@b (Discussed changesets: 1) | درود، لطفا در ویرایش دقت بفرمایید! باتشکر commented 2025-07-13 07:07:56 UTC by xYashaRx ♦180 |
| 168738183 (Comments: 4) | Theo777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Τότε ας ονομάσουμε την βουνοκορφή ως "Ψαλίδα"... commented 2025-07-13 06:50:47 UTC by Theo777 ♦1 |
 | 168857761 (Comments: 2) | map_them_all (Discussed changesets: 3) | *applies to the section between commented 2025-07-13 05:21:14 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦367 |
| 168392980 (Comments: 1) | PanhandleMapGroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, Welcome to OSM! It appears you are a relatively new mapper. I thought I'd offer some corrections to your edits. It appears you changed the building type for Way 839751732 from cathedral to church. Was there a reason for this? Also, i... commented 2025-07-13 04:16:06 UTC by Always_Dreamin ♦4 |
| 168849021 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 47) | I also vaguely remember there might be relevant discussions before. With this section of road having `share_taxi=no`, perhaps the ring outside the airport is not intended. (iirc this road was made just to connect to the newly opened railway st... commented 2025-07-13 03:49:25 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦39 |
| 162722705 (Comments: 2) | Bmmederos3333 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I previously asked you why you have moved the node for Hialeah as much as you did and you have not gotten back to me on this in 5 months so I am assuming vandalism in this case, so I am reverting. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168857... commented 2025-07-13 03:31:32 UTC by Udarian ♦411 |
| 162722682 (Comments: 1) | Bmmederos3333 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I previously asked you why you have moved the node for Hialeah as much as you did and you have not gotten back to me on this in 5 months so I am assuming vandalism in this case, so I am reverting. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168857... commented 2025-07-13 03:31:32 UTC by Udarian ♦411 |
| 168649091 (Comments: 7) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 47) | 1. I'm talking about northbound which is bypassed by `=primary` Hill Rd Flyover. Seems a close comparison. 2. You keep discussing CPBR only, but is it really comparable? For reference only, the bypassed CWBR is officially a District Distrib... commented 2025-07-13 03:06:18 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,543 |
| 168719617 (Comments: 2) | RupertJames (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi there, there was not a name for the new trail. If it was recently named, then that should be the correct name now. commented 2025-07-13 02:27:53 UTC by RupertJames ♦5 |
| 167779514 (Comments: 1) | Moinsdix (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Moinsdix, You added "F25" to new cycleways that make part of the new cycle highway F25. However, these cycle paths don't have a name. They are linked to each other via a cycle route relation > https://www.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2025-07-13 01:29:54 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦245 |
| 160688730 (Comments: 9) | Władysław Komorek (Discussed changesets: 208) | osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer 1.Czytaj ze zrozumieniem. 2. Zapoznaj się z tematem ze zrozumieniem, bo widzę że nie masz zielonego pojęcia na temat mapowania grobów, zaczynając odgrzebywać stare tematy jak j... commented 2025-07-13 01:26:20 UTC by Władysław Komorek ♦93 |
| 166859991 (Comments: 1) | Tom1010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The footprint I flagged envelopes two buildings. It's easier to see this in bing. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859991 commented 2025-07-13 01:22:49 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166859199 (Comments: 1) | Haïdane Garcin (Discussed changesets: 2) | You are identifying buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are generally oversized. Take care to not include the shadow in the footprint. I think this oversizing contributed to the mapping of shared nodes and overlapping between foot... commented 2025-07-13 01:17:07 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164178107 (Comments: 1) | lfoguenne (Discussed changesets: 2) | Generally the buildings you mapped are valid and appropriately squared, but oversized. Take care to not include the shadow in the footprint and keep in mind that roofs tend to overhang building walls. --- ... commented 2025-07-13 01:01:23 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 167791117 (Comments: 1) | p99 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Löschen ist hier der falsche Weg, wenn Dir construction=* nicht gefällt, bietet sich proposed:highway=* bzw. planned:highway=* an. Wenn Du neuere Informationen hast, als den Bebauungsplan, dann bitte als Quelle verlinken. Danke. commented 2025-07-13 00:50:49 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦59 |
| 159483751 (Comments: 1) | LuxuryCoop (Discussed changesets: 19) | Overall a good contribution. The footpritns are generally valid and accurate. The highways and residential areas have been modified to avoid data overlap issues.--- Highways should follow the centre of the road in the imagery. The round footprint you... commented 2025-07-13 00:43:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 159717588 (Comments: 1) | Judeah Galon (Discussed changesets: 5) | There is a building here but the footprint you mapped is several times the size of the building. Accuracy of mapping matters. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience th... commented 2025-07-13 00:04:30 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166717659 (Comments: 1) | Sturm br (Discussed changesets: 22) | Oi, tudo bem? to corrigindo alguns erros de curvas agudas e sempre estou encontrando um padrão na via de acesso a rotatorias mapeadas por você, é legal deixar que cada via seja uma linha independente por questões de boas pr... commented 2025-07-12 23:52:31 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦60 |
| 168292353 (Comments: 1) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | This was an unnecessary and quite low quality edit. Please take a look at the placement=* tag and refrain from moving junction nodes away from the actual junctions. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published usi... commented 2025-07-12 23:33:47 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,117 |
| 168854301 (Comments: 1) | Psztomol (Discussed changesets: 76) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/643555154 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-07-12 22:51:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168776761 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Just a few things that might be of use: 1. You may want to add `public_transport:version=2` to the route relations so that editors and error checking tools can better understand which pt version is being used. (https://wiki.open... commented 2025-07-12 22:33:05 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦28 |
| 168834056 (Comments: 1) | Kerim1575 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, Lütfen büyük değişiklik seti yapmaktan kaçınalım. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2025-07-12 21:55:39 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦4 |
| 168819153 (Comments: 1) | geosteven (Discussed changesets: 2) | though Place comes before East as well --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168819153 commented 2025-07-12 21:33:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,117 |
| 168766466 (Comments: 3) | Murali3 (Discussed changesets: 9) | please respond commented 2025-07-12 21:31:08 UTC by Udarian ♦411 |
| 142381261 (Comments: 3) | stadtlohne (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo stadtlohne, ich war heute vor Ort und habe den Straßentyp korrigiert, aber weshalb steht hier das Verkehrsschild DE:250? Die Anwohner kommen nicht mit ihren Fahrzeugen zu ihren Häusern. commented 2025-07-12 21:22:03 UTC by skorpion62 ♦73 |
| 168816371 (Comments: 2) | Hungerburg (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hello there and welcome! These tags are on a POI that features in a scientific paper: ref:Wenger should be self-explaining - it is a reference to the name of the author of the paper and cites/quotes a shorthand to the resource there. ele:Wenge... commented 2025-07-12 21:20:03 UTC by Hungerburg ♦410 |
| 168818841 (Comments: 3) | auditor98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sure. OSM has a lot of tags - not all of them are applicable to every object. The editor tries to show you the ones that are most relevant for the type of object you have selected, but it doesn't mean that all of them are mandatory. Regar... commented 2025-07-12 21:02:29 UTC by citrula ♦857 |
| 165159925 (Comments: 1) | Czaszyn (Discussed changesets: 79) | W Komendzie SOK jest jakiś aparat telefoniczny, którym można zadzwonić po SOK? commented 2025-07-12 21:00:17 UTC by Rogoyski ♦221 |
| 168843100 (Comments: 1) | Laz627 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you move this node to its correct location? You have placed it in the middle of a sidewalk. Thanks, Joel commented 2025-07-12 20:56:58 UTC by joel56dt ♦170 |
| 168848252 (Comments: 1) | yinef12012 (Discussed changesets: 3) | please don't duplicate data next time, the business has already been moved into the building, please check before duplicating next time. commented 2025-07-12 20:55:06 UTC by Udarian ♦411 |
| 168820181 (Comments: 1) | 近江商人 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19345794 does not look like a horse riding arena (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412930874 does not look like an equestrian centre; the whole thing is probably th... commented 2025-07-12 20:37:09 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦756 |
| 168750966 (Comments: 1) | IvicaBanovac (Discussed changesets: 47) | Reverted because node was created. #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168851491 commented 2025-07-12 20:30:38 UTC by KarlaIbrahić ♦45 |
| 168850886 (Comments: 1) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 9) | Parkering, og bygningspolygoner rettet i vestbyen. commented 2025-07-12 20:07:25 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦12 |
| 168843184 (Comments: 1) | Karl2710 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Moin, ich habe hier deinen changeset gesehen. Wenn du highway=give_way oder stop als note in den way rein machst, macht es sinn da auch ein direction=forward/backward - also die richtung in die das Schild gilt relativ zur richtung des wege... commented 2025-07-12 19:53:23 UTC by flohoff ♦2,364 |
| 168756468 (Comments: 1) | SantanaVII (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, des commentaires plus explicites seraient appréciés. En l'occurrence, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre et il est difficile de deviner l'intention. Je ... commented 2025-07-12 19:48:30 UTC by StC ♦254 |
| 167738831 (Comments: 3) | EM_OSM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, when you know the area of a place you can map it as area, else you can use a node in the middle of the estimated area. You can learn a lot from the wiki. In this case about fuel stations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fue... commented 2025-07-12 19:37:16 UTC by kapazao ♦909 |
| 168849902 (Comments: 1) | atchisson (Discussed changesets: 3) | noizay * commented 2025-07-12 19:34:39 UTC by atchisson ♦11 |
 | 167319822 (Comments: 1) | 2weiklang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! In Latvia streets only have names where the cadastre specifies them. This one should have no name (noname=yes tag), which I added. commented 2025-07-12 19:21:13 UTC by Pilsetkartetajs ♦10 |
| 168327524 (Comments: 1) | vakulya (Discussed changesets: 39) | Szia! Árpádházi Szent Erzsébet utcának mi a forrása, mindenhol térnek hivatkozzák és kötőjellel. Tamás commented 2025-07-12 19:09:37 UTC by vasony ♦500 |
| 168079687 (Comments: 3) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 117) | Jak chcesz, to mogę udostępnić zrektyfikowany podkład - nie dodawałem (chyba) małej architektury, lamp i części obszarów commented 2025-07-12 19:02:03 UTC by Anas masuris ♦118 |
| 167783089 (Comments: 1) | Térképszerkesztő (Discussed changesets: 31) | itt van az elnevezés: https://mikrodat.gyongyos.hu/app/cms/api/honlap/getfile/244f6c0a-0081-11ee-95c2-5b497678973b/168_utcan%C3%A9v.pdf commented 2025-07-12 18:50:05 UTC by vasony ♦500 |
 | 168810493 (Comments: 4) | Donut Master 🍩 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Thanks again! commented 2025-07-12 18:50:02 UTC by Donut Master 🍩 ♦22 |
| 168735042 (Comments: 3) | HJGroenVRFR (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hij is al aangepast zie ik. Op de 8cm-beelden lijkt dat inderdaad een voetpad net als bij de weg ernaast. Die lijkt ergens rond 2022/2023 daar erin gekomen te zijn. Toen ik deze straten intekende was dat nog een doorgang voor het bouwverkeer zo te zi... commented 2025-07-12 18:48:15 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦650 |
| 168847807 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Dzięki ci dobry człowieku. W końcu wlazłem na ten przystanek albo on na mnie i zrobiłem foty. Nim bym sam zgłębił czy ma być z 04 czy bez to by zeszło z tydzień. Wiem, że gdzieś widziałem jakieś wskazówki czy dodawać ... commented 2025-07-12 18:46:21 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦465 |
| 161193747 (Comments: 2) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 953) | Il y a surtout un supermarché dd trop commented 2025-07-12 18:45:23 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦225 |
| 68975542 (Comments: 2) | Mike Parfitt (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi Adrian, Given that both ends of Shillingford Lane join public highways, then unclassified is the better tag. Mike commented 2025-07-12 18:34:42 UTC by Mike Parfitt ♦13 |
| 167772019 (Comments: 1) | reggelicola (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Mi az utcanév forrása? Tamás commented 2025-07-12 18:33:23 UTC by vasony ♦500 |
| 168837964 (Comments: 1) | FFeuerwehrBannberscheid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen: - Das Feld „couplings“ bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchans... commented 2025-07-12 18:33:04 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168846332 (Comments: 2) | JVSRamos (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem, I'll revise the description. commented 2025-07-12 18:30:00 UTC by JVSRamos ♦1 |
| 164281310 (Comments: 2) | labtex02309 (Discussed changesets: 1) | sorry, mistake from osmand. fixed it commented 2025-07-12 18:12:56 UTC by labtex02309 ♦1 |
| 168404130 (Comments: 2) | Fahem Ben yarou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Don't worry about having deleted those footprints; I restored them. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404130 commented 2025-07-12 18:09:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166857442 (Comments: 1) | lau16nn7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The footprints you're adding are valid, appropriately squared, and fairly accurate, though sometimes slightly oversized. You mapped with bing imagery which is older at time of mapping and so the footprints do not align with ESRI. I recomment off... commented 2025-07-12 18:08:43 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168811113 (Comments: 1) | Iceberg84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Benvenuto in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. Quindi hai 2 opzioni: ... commented 2025-07-12 18:00:38 UTC by demon_box ♦359 |
| 168572199 (Comments: 2) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 18) | Okay danke für den Hinweis. Ich werde es alsbald fertigstellen commented 2025-07-12 17:59:09 UTC by vikiawv ♦15 |
| 136639781 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 149) | second URL should be https://www.corko.net/news/autumn-league-2-garretstown-wood-ballinspittle-tuesday-september-6th-results-and-report Best recent picture is likely this one https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1199185162220307&set=a... commented 2025-07-12 17:53:26 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦675 |
| 168846475 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 43) | Oops, the source should also include "Esri World Imagery" for confirmation of the approximate location. commented 2025-07-12 17:50:08 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦53 |
| 168402958 (Comments: 1) | Matthieu PASQUIER (Discussed changesets: 1) | Valid footprints but the imagery allows for them to be more accurate. Pease remember to square them with q. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or... commented 2025-07-12 17:49:09 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168121440 (Comments: 5) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 196) | It happens. It's all endless links. If you see something like that where a coastline is tagged as node and is blatantly wrong - don't hesitate to correct. commented 2025-07-12 17:47:12 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,044 |
| 115313212 (Comments: 3) | Ich2PunktNull (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ok, danke! commented 2025-07-12 17:46:05 UTC by wolfbert ♦109 |
| 166859766 (Comments: 1) | eeemeraude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vakid and quite accurate footprint. Please remember to square footprints when appropriate. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859766 commented 2025-07-12 17:37:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 167823877 (Comments: 1) | bhmaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo bhmaps, Du warst hier ganz fleißig am Daten ergänzen. Allerdings ist es nicht richtig, an den Eingängen "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:flats" zu ergänzen. In D gibt es keine Unteradressen f&u... commented 2025-07-12 17:04:29 UTC by pyram ♦505 |
| 168085594 (Comments: 1) | StijnRR (Discussed changesets: 40) | Beste Stijn, betreft de beek Hoevewijerloop. In GRB zie ik dat de naam Hoeverwijerloop is. Ook in de inventaris van de waterwegen van GIS Limburg is het Hoeverwijerloop. Idem in Loket Onroerend Erfgoed, Vlaamse Landmaatschappij,... commented 2025-07-12 17:03:34 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 168844302 (Comments: 1) | berndw (Discussed changesets: 72) | Typo Vz 240 ;-) commented 2025-07-12 17:01:41 UTC by berndw ♦591 |
| 168844785 (Comments: 1) | berndw (Discussed changesets: 72) | Typo Vz 240 commented 2025-07-12 17:01:24 UTC by berndw ♦591 |
| 168457169 (Comments: 5) | Sparnonien (Discussed changesets: 2) | oui !!! à ce jour il est possible de passer en vélo et à pied et je rouvrirai la rue après travaux . je ne connais pas la date malheureusement. belle soirée à vous commented 2025-07-12 16:53:20 UTC by Sparnonien ♦1 |
| 165782962 (Comments: 1) | technicat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey technicat, a restaurant closing doesn't cause a building to no longer exist. In the future, please only delete the relevant tags instead of the entire way (and you can use the shop=vacant tag) commented 2025-07-12 16:46:41 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦36 |
| 168402761 (Comments: 1) | Maëlle Garda (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think the northern footprint envelopes multiple buildings. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402761 commented 2025-07-12 16:39:01 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168403608 (Comments: 1) | mariem04 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Though the imagery allows them to be mapped more accurately all the round footprints you added here are valid i.e. they represent round buildings in the imagery. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2025-07-12 16:37:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
 | 165414285 (Comments: 1) | Esabela (Discussed changesets: 12) | Task 38 #17823: Tokar floodings Hello, @Esabela , please map buildings individually and not entire groups of courtyards. Thank you, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2025-07-12 16:35:18 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦97 |
| 168402844 (Comments: 1) | Fahem Ben yarou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! These footprints do represent buildings in the imagery but they could be more accurate. Remember to square footprtins when appropriate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If... commented 2025-07-12 16:27:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168402847 (Comments: 1) | mariem04 (Discussed changesets: 3) | These footprints could be more accurate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you at... commented 2025-07-12 16:26:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 159483385 (Comments: 1) | 지구여행가 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The footprints I flagged here have odd and inaccurate shaped. check to see if a building's footprint could be accurately mapped using simple shapes before considering more unique options. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in fu... commented 2025-07-12 16:22:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 159482757 (Comments: 1) | 지구여행가 (Discussed changesets: 2) | You correctly identified that this is a T shaped building --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482757 commented 2025-07-12 16:19:49 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
 | 168843068 (Comments: 1) | Natsu_ (Discussed changesets: 20) | 公共汽车208路(惠州市)更新。 commented 2025-07-12 16:18:43 UTC by Natsu_ ♦19 |
| 159482984 (Comments: 1) | 지구여행가 (Discussed changesets: 2) | You correctly identified buildings in the imagery here but the footprints could be more accurate. I flagged two footprints which I though were well mapped. It looks like you mapped using alternate imagery or an offset leading to a missalignment with ... commented 2025-07-12 16:18:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166857599 (Comments: 1) | maézed (Discussed changesets: 2) | A valid and appropriately shaped footprint. If it were a little smaller it'd be excellent. Keep in mind that pitched roofs tend to overhang building walls somewhat. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or ... commented 2025-07-12 16:12:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166857505 (Comments: 1) | maézed (Discussed changesets: 2) | These footpritns are valid and you distinguished between round and square buildings well but they could be more accurate. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. please remember to square (q) your footprints. The southern most foo... commented 2025-07-12 16:10:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168402696 (Comments: 1) | mariem04 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The footprints I flagged are likely temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback ... commented 2025-07-12 16:05:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168839500 (Comments: 1) | Denay Samosa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi again. This 'shop' is not verifiable by anyone visiting the location. I know it to be a residential house, not a shop with any publicly accessible premises. Temporary objects like vehicles should not be mapped either. Hope that ... commented 2025-07-12 16:02:54 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦95 |
| 168716062 (Comments: 1) | MaseRayL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you added a couple of strange 'rv:..." tags. Could you explain what they mean? commented 2025-07-12 15:59:28 UTC by mueschel ♦6,574 |
| 168403109 (Comments: 1) | Marilyne Depem (Discussed changesets: 7) | The Eastern footprint represents a building while the western one represents a likely garden. Beware that walls can cast shadows similar to buildings; use context clues to help you determine which is which. --- ... commented 2025-07-12 15:56:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168403281 (Comments: 1) | Marilyne Depem (Discussed changesets: 7) | The western footprint is oversized, the southern one is a garden not a building and the eastern one is actually square not round; you can tell becasue of the roof colour. Buildings with blue roofs in this area do not tend to be round. Determine how t... commented 2025-07-12 15:54:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168403555 (Comments: 1) | Marilyne Depem (Discussed changesets: 7) | You were doing the right thing by modifying the residential area and improved its geometry, but it and a highway share nodes with buildings. Hold alt while mapping to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank ... commented 2025-07-12 15:51:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168403794 (Comments: 1) | Marilyne Depem (Discussed changesets: 7) | The footprint I flagged contains multiple buildings. Map one building per footprint. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback... commented 2025-07-12 15:50:06 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168404037 (Comments: 1) | Marilyne Depem (Discussed changesets: 7) | These footprints are generally the correct shape but are oversized. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappe... commented 2025-07-12 15:49:10 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168404547 (Comments: 1) | Marilyne Depem (Discussed changesets: 7) | You created shared nodes between footprints and the area. Read mt project comments to see how to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community... commented 2025-07-12 15:48:13 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168404283 (Comments: 1) | Marilyne Depem (Discussed changesets: 7) | The shape of the footpritns you added here appears correct. THe footprint I flagged is actually a tree; you can tell becasue it overlaps a square building's footprint so a building could not fit there. --- ... commented 2025-07-12 15:47:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 159483108 (Comments: 1) | aracho (Discussed changesets: 3) | You improved the map data here by replacing oversized building footprints. The ones you added could still be more accurate, please remember to square footprints when appropriate. --- Published using OSMCh... commented 2025-07-12 15:33:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 159453048 (Comments: 1) | Ndiu (Discussed changesets: 3) | These footprints do not accuratelly represent the shape of buildings in the imagery. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback... commented 2025-07-12 15:31:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168840938 (Comments: 1) | HAPKOMAHcer (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-07-12 15:31:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 159452042 (Comments: 1) | Ndiu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! these footpritns are oversized outlining yards and gardens as well as the buildings. Take care to map only the buildings and one footprint per building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your... commented 2025-07-12 15:28:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168673725 (Comments: 3) | alstond981 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you, I appreciate your response! commented 2025-07-12 15:25:46 UTC by Joseph R P ♦353 |
| 168404337 (Comments: 1) | Inès Tribot Laspière (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! The round buildings in the SW and the Western most square footprint are well mapped. More like that in future please. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404337 |
| 168403046 (Comments: 1) | elksa (Discussed changesets: 1) | welcome to OSM. PLease upload your work every 5-15 minutes rather than uploadign each footprint individually. This saves time saving and uploading your work and makes it easier for others to review it. A good changeset should have a logical theme and... commented 2025-07-12 15:12:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168402930 (Comments: 1) | Antoine Jacquemet (Discussed changesets: 1) | You idenitifed square buildings in the imagery but their footprints could be more accurate. Please read my project comments. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402930 ... commented 2025-07-12 15:07:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168822488 (Comments: 3) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 10) | You reverted other mappers’ contributions just because of your “obsession” with “historic” boundaries. And the “products” you left are hundreds of broken boundaries that people have to fix for you. commented 2025-07-12 15:05:57 UTC by Tommybara ♦91 |
| 168839570 (Comments: 1) | Ziemowit Zabawa (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zmiany analogicznie jak w zestawach zmian 145943552 oraz 151553048. commented 2025-07-12 15:03:12 UTC by Ziemowit Zabawa ♦29 |
| 168839644 (Comments: 1) | Ziemowit Zabawa (Discussed changesets: 15) | Uzasadnienie analogicznie jak w zestawie zmian 163607696. commented 2025-07-12 15:00:36 UTC by Ziemowit Zabawa ♦29 |
| 168822982 (Comments: 2) | Tommybara (Discussed changesets: 29) | It is nonsense bc I don’t see any difference between your “Tỉnh Cao Bằng cũ” and the current Cao Bằng provincial boundaries, so I don’t really see the point of having “Tỉnh Cao Bằng cũ”. So is “T... commented 2025-07-12 14:56:36 UTC by Tommybara ♦91 |
| 168838462 (Comments: 1) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Na temat nazw miałeś już coś mówione i nadal robisz po swojemu. Znajdź sobie inne name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:name Swoją edycją name zepsułeś czyjąś edycję. Wycofuję. https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-07-12 14:54:17 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦465 |
| 167069934 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Palma Ojeda (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hola. Los nombres de los puentes van en bridge:name=, no en el name= saludos commented 2025-07-12 14:48:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 167946711 (Comments: 3) | mircozorzo (Discussed changesets: 55) | Perfetto, grazie a te. Avrei sistemato io, ma sono ancora agli inizi e temevo di fare danni. commented 2025-07-12 14:44:21 UTC by civ41 ♦5 |
| X | 168755260 (Comments: 4) | Roette2000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the tip. I will do this. And yes, "bleachers" is what i meant to add and fits very nicely! commented 2025-07-12 14:33:53 UTC by Roette2000 ♦1 |
| 168832778 (Comments: 1) | feige677 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo feige677, du hats in diesem Änderungssatz den Parkplatz an die Straße "geklebt". Dies halte ich für suboptimal, da somit suggeriert wird, der Parklatz gehe bis zur Mitte der Straße (die ja nur als Linie und nicht... commented 2025-07-12 14:29:55 UTC by uvi ♦133 |
| 168838036 (Comments: 1) | Viktorvi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Viktorvi, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. ... commented 2025-07-12 14:26:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 122298107 (Comments: 2) | bielebog (Discussed changesets: 105) | Just corrected with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168838372 Used https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dnine_mens_morris instead of "mill" Thanks for spotting this commented 2025-07-12 14:23:31 UTC by bielebog ♦269 |
| 168636745 (Comments: 1) | Pere Antoni (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, You are creating duplicate elements of existing places and the tag is also inappropriate (this is clearly not a city). commented 2025-07-12 14:20:27 UTC by acubens71 ♦31 |
| 135993574 (Comments: 1) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 38) | Building is demolished and replaced with the Ralph S. O'Connor Building for Engineering Science. commented 2025-07-12 14:19:06 UTC by Lonestarmapper ♦1 |
| 168837776 (Comments: 1) | YuliyaSurta (Discussed changesets: 51) | Also changed road class. commented 2025-07-12 14:06:08 UTC by YuliyaSurta ♦51 |
| 168833858 (Comments: 2) | rmammouth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, you're correct, I made the change by mistake. I just reverted it. commented 2025-07-12 13:59:35 UTC by rmammouth ♦1 |
| 168750324 (Comments: 2) | JAKeys (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! I think I've fixed the footbridge. commented 2025-07-12 13:29:26 UTC by JAKeys ♦1 |
| 168818536 (Comments: 1) | Pella_Locations_Import (Discussed changesets: 6) | Here again addr:full should be expanded to individual fields. Opening hours should be conflated. commented 2025-07-12 13:28:52 UTC by Mashin ♦562 |
| 168817999 (Comments: 1) | Pella_Locations_Import (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, here again, (in addition to add:full tag) this: "+1 203-846-['9', '4', '5', '0']" is not a valid value for telephone number. It should be +1 203-8469;+1 203-8464;+1 203-8465;+1 203-8460 <... commented 2025-07-12 13:27:37 UTC by Mashin ♦562 |
| 168818593 (Comments: 1) | Pella_Locations_Import (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, Sorry where was this import discussed? The problem I see here that addr:full is not good way how to add address to POI. Especially it should not replace good address data that was already parsed to addr:* subfields. commented 2025-07-12 13:22:19 UTC by Mashin ♦562 |
| 165897908 (Comments: 1) | didierbf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, il y a beaucoup de problèmes de continuité dans cet itinéraire, dont une boucle (deux itinéraires pour aller d'un point A à un point B). Avez-vous la possibilité d'y jeter un coup d&... commented 2025-07-12 13:18:14 UTC by StC ♦254 |
 | 168784291 (Comments: 2) | OSMchik (Discussed changesets: 33) | По ошибке, скорее всего. Спасибо за правку! commented 2025-07-12 13:16:17 UTC by OSMchik ♦20 |
| 165576131 (Comments: 1) | Map_Team (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, des commentaires plus concrets seraient utiles pour comprendre ce que vous avez fait. Il me semble que ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, mais votre co... commented 2025-07-12 13:08:07 UTC by StC ♦254 |
| 168819389 (Comments: 2) | cgmimm23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thankyou commented 2025-07-12 13:07:55 UTC by cgmimm23 ♦1 |
| 168424600 (Comments: 15) | amalash (Discussed changesets: 2) | For info, the DWG got a nudge which mentioned this changeset discussion (not, I hasten to add, a complaint about it directly). I think a forum thread might make more sense (it'd be a bit more visible and allow easier linking) so I've creat... commented 2025-07-12 13:00:59 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168255290 (Comments: 1) | ThomasDu (Discussed changesets: 32) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé en plusieurs endroits la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2025-07-12 12:55:53 UTC by StC ♦254 |
 | 168709149 (Comments: 1) | meowWoof (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-07-12 12:38:14 UTC by Frans S ♦9,821 |
| 167837114 (Comments: 1) | DKTR99921222 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Servus. Nieco zle na predchadzajucom changesete? commented 2025-07-12 12:32:09 UTC by vmicho ♦76 |
| 167796371 (Comments: 1) | Jo_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-07-12 12:31:28 UTC by Frans S ♦9,821 |
| 168832096 (Comments: 1) | Sparty0 (Discussed changesets: 174) | Minęło pięć dni od ostatniej wymiany zdań. Patrząc na kolejne edycje widzę, że nadal masz problem ze zrozumieniem oraz nie zmieniasz sposobu edycji https://postimg.cc/8J0c9jPP https://postimg.cc/gXJrgvpT Skoro jestem dla cie... commented 2025-07-12 12:18:07 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦465 |
| 168747000 (Comments: 4) | RRIbarruri (Discussed changesets: 20) | сделал commented 2025-07-12 12:01:46 UTC by literan ♦6,699 |
| 163141697 (Comments: 1) | based_kronberger (Discussed changesets: 17) | Why did you change an osm_id for Schmitten im Taunus??? commented 2025-07-12 11:57:26 UTC by LeoMarin ♦1 |
| 168833526 (Comments: 1) | DimaLebedev (Discussed changesets: 2) | Clarification: Fixed road geometry according to BDOrtho IGN #mapbox_linters commented 2025-07-12 11:55:46 UTC by DimaLebedev ♦2 |
| 168833491 (Comments: 1) | Valario127 (Discussed changesets: 2) | *Yeles commented 2025-07-12 11:55:00 UTC by Valario127 ♦2 |
| 166862864 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 393) | Bonjour, Ce SIRET (39998309700011) a été ajouté à 14 laboratoires de la région parisienne alors qu'il correspond à un laboratoire situé à Vaires-sur-Marne. Les SIRET corrects d&ea... commented 2025-07-12 11:50:20 UTC by karr4s ♦31 |
| 168829339 (Comments: 2) | adejot (Discussed changesets: 12) | Poprawione. commented 2025-07-12 11:48:51 UTC by adejot ♦9 |
| 168832910 (Comments: 2) | adejot (Discussed changesets: 12) | Poprawione. commented 2025-07-12 11:48:21 UTC by adejot ♦9 |
 | 156061276 (Comments: 2) | LarsChristianGamborg (Discussed changesets: 5) | Opened again end of November 2024. https://www.mittloerenskog.no/e6-pakjoringen-har-endelig-apnet-for-trafikk/s/5-129-105139 commented 2025-07-12 11:47:21 UTC by EvenEvneNeve ♦1 |
| 162240973 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 393) | Bonjour, Ce SIRET (32066338800017) correspond à un magasin Linvosges situé à Gérardmer et est clôturé. Néanmoins, il a été ajouté à 16 établissements un peu partout... commented 2025-07-12 11:46:41 UTC by karr4s ♦31 |
| 168832813 (Comments: 1) | DimaLebedev (Discussed changesets: 2) | Clarification: Fixed road geometry, removed oneway according by NRW Orthophoto (RGB) #mapbox_linters commented 2025-07-12 11:35:56 UTC by DimaLebedev ♦2 |
| 168779640 (Comments: 2) | Warin61 (Discussed changesets: 155) | This one just stuck out. I tried to contact the original mapper and have not response for serval weeks and so .. deleted. If you know of others it would be worthwhile to contact the author and see what they say .. if no response after several wee... commented 2025-07-12 11:34:46 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,666 |
| 168832416 (Comments: 1) | YuliyaSurta (Discussed changesets: 51) | Also fixed road geometry. commented 2025-07-12 11:22:57 UTC by YuliyaSurta ♦51 |
| 168821306 (Comments: 1) | Kristy Perez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello1 Please be careful! You moved two nodes more than 100 meters (crossing other streets and buildings). I move the botth nodes back to the original position. Please check the situation. commented 2025-07-12 11:20:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 113974011 (Comments: 4) | Mashin (Discussed changesets: 38) | I believe that if the multipolygon relation has only a single member (which is the outer way) then is should be deled and the tags moved to the closed way. commented 2025-07-12 11:20:15 UTC by Mashin ♦562 |
| 166586380 (Comments: 4) | osmaccount (Discussed changesets: 7) | k-und-u.com leitet ja auf die neue URL um. Ist die Frage ob es Sinn macht sowas bei einem geschlossenen Geschäft zu updaten, aber ich denke es schadet auch nicht. Entschuldige wenn ich Verwirrung gestiftet habe. commented 2025-07-12 11:19:09 UTC by osmaccount ♦5 |
| 168829315 (Comments: 1) | Smiles On Chapel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, You need to add a new node and add the tags to that instead of adding your business details to an admin boundary. I have reverted this changeset. commented 2025-07-12 11:18:13 UTC by nevw ♦1,980 |
| 168782607 (Comments: 1) | DSiezenga (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-12 11:11:00 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
 | 168831320 (Comments: 1) | Ggaggi77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Novi sad, "Karika Plus" DOO za veleprodaja vijčane robe, šrafova, matica, lanaca, ležajeva (FKL, SKF i td.) brusnog i reznog alata i HTZ opreme. Ne vršimo prodaju na komad! commented 2025-07-12 11:07:46 UTC by Ggaggi77 ♦1 |
| 168787849 (Comments: 2) | Vika26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | спам про "возбуждает" тоже вычищен commented 2025-07-12 11:06:25 UTC by literan ♦6,699 |
| 168764177 (Comments: 1) | TheAmzingTaco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-12 11:05:35 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168800713 (Comments: 1) | GCWMR (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-07-12 11:05:08 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,862 |
| 168826028 (Comments: 1) | datensafe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Bitte keine bereits bestehenden Punkte für die Einträge verwenden, sondern die Hydranten auf der entsprechenden Seite neben die Straße setzen. commented 2025-07-12 11:03:39 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,288 |
| 168742869 (Comments: 1) | Flsh_mcqnn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please check my correction of http://www.osm.org/node/12992368741. I changed the key ax to phone commented 2025-07-12 11:02:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168752034 (Comments: 2) | skatebikermaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag skatebikermaps, De Python Rollercoaster staat al op de kaart en daar op de weide hoort dus niet een dubbele vermelding te staan. Ik pas het even aan. commented 2025-07-12 11:01:44 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168796106 (Comments: 2) | あじさか (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the comment! Understood. I’ll keep only the main Wikipedia tag and remove the other language tags. commented 2025-07-12 11:00:58 UTC by あじさか ♦3 |
| 168762012 (Comments: 4) | Canard164 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No, I didn’t know this website. Thank you for this link. Have a nice day! commented 2025-07-12 11:00:54 UTC by Canard164 ♦3 |
 | 165270572 (Comments: 2) | ZevsGromov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Deleted one of the hotels commented 2025-07-12 11:00:08 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦119 |
| 161219787 (Comments: 2) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Also: "highway=path" ist selber kontrovers, die Logik dahinter teilweise widersprechend und/oder realitätsfremd und m.M.n. hätte es im jetzigen Zustand nie akzeptiert werden sollen (selbst Carto rendert diese als Radwege). Auch we... commented 2025-07-12 10:59:21 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦197 |
| 168790166 (Comments: 5) | Poggs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please ref:GB (because country codes are in upper letters, language codes are in lower letters ) :) commented 2025-07-12 10:58:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168744774 (Comments: 1) | Veracious Vivek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-12 10:56:56 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168598878 (Comments: 3) | skliarovskyi (Discussed changesets: 9) | I've changed the number back commented 2025-07-12 10:53:37 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦119 |
| 168783664 (Comments: 3) | tuan_gsm (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hoặc là anh chắc chắn có hính ko còn biển cấm nữa thì xoá luôn. Còn nếu nó chỉ báo lỗi là thiếu thành phần thì không nên xo&aa... commented 2025-07-12 10:49:46 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦232 |
| 168739801 (Comments: 2) | keven1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | dag Keven1, Alle begin is moeilijk en fouten maken we allemaal. Zo is het in NL niet gebruikelijk om netwerk en operator op een bushalte te taggen. De bushalte is en blijft eigendom van de gemeente en kan door meerdere busmaatschappijen ... commented 2025-07-12 10:44:53 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
 | 168820164 (Comments: 1) | FavourTaiwo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good work. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168820164 commented 2025-07-12 10:42:33 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦97 |
| 168787063 (Comments: 2) | tuan_gsm (Discussed changesets: 19) | fix luôn cho nhanh bên đó không có check comment commented 2025-07-12 10:41:57 UTC by tuan_gsm ♦23 |
| 168828347 (Comments: 1) | Tjuro (Discussed changesets: 39) | Je hebt de surface van de sidewalk (separate) verwijderd. We willen de surface van de sidewalk weten toch? commented 2025-07-12 10:37:01 UTC by Ebruinsma ♦4 |
| 168737009 (Comments: 2) | JelleRaap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi Jelle, Het is goed om te weten dat de gebouwen in NL rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster. Fouten in dit systeem van de overheid kun je hier melden: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?them... commented 2025-07-12 10:34:52 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168767531 (Comments: 1) | 309_308_307 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Danke :) commented 2025-07-12 10:29:52 UTC by dreua ♦119 |
| 168736005 (Comments: 1) | DanielsGrafik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi DanielsGrafik, De omvang van je changset omvat zo ongeveer half Nederland en een groot deel van Duitsland. Met het verschuiven van de kaart heb je in Duinrell, Wassenaar een enorme schade veroorzaakt. Gelukkig was het toch eenvoudig t... commented 2025-07-12 10:19:10 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 155774410 (Comments: 4) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 144) | To powinniśmy oznaczać tory tramwajowe jako highway=tram? Pisałem na Discordzie jak tramwaje są o wiele bardziej podobne do pociągów niż do autobusów, jeśli chodzi o tagi OSMowe. Platform we Wrocławiu częściej mapuje si... commented 2025-07-12 10:17:49 UTC by pavvv ♦498 |
| 167640078 (Comments: 3) | CPK-PrB (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.google.nl/maps/@51.5987005,4.7166691,3a,45.5y,332.35h,90.66t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sHaEdhR3dLbIujooxZYRwOg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-0.6... commented 2025-07-12 10:12:29 UTC by CPK-PrB ♦10 |
| 168588976 (Comments: 3) | Crow187 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aber dann löschen wir den Weg nicht so einfach und zerstören Relationen! Du hättest das nicht mehr existierende Wegestück auf removed:highway=path setzen können (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_pref... commented 2025-07-12 10:11:58 UTC by DeFra85 ♦236 |
| 168791029 (Comments: 2) | voschix (Discussed changesets: 65) | Thanks. Already corrected. Spotted it myself. commented 2025-07-12 10:09:24 UTC by voschix ♦180 |
| 142853733 (Comments: 1) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 76) | Bonjour, Ceci n'est pas une traversée autorisée : il n'y a aucun équipement de sécurité ni avertissement d'aucune sorte. C'est plus que délicat de la maintenir dans la base laissan... commented 2025-07-12 10:09:08 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦90 |
| 168416847 (Comments: 12) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 290) | Kryterium jest takie, że droga ma być bezkolizyjna i dłuższa niż 5 km. Więcej detali oraz toczy się dyskusja na forum. commented 2025-07-12 10:06:53 UTC by pavvv ♦498 |
| 168808021 (Comments: 1) | tvmino (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/4538574204. What is the mean of the tag v6p1 = v6s ? commented 2025-07-12 10:04:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168829444 (Comments: 1) | 51tomek (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-07-12 10:00:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 120271705 (Comments: 2) | Guillaume Castagnino (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, Alors il s’agit probablement d’une typo. Cela fait 3 ans, ça n’est pas sur ma zone habituelle de contribution, j’étais en vacances (en plus vespucci c’est pas mon outil préfér&ea... commented 2025-07-12 09:59:21 UTC by Guillaume Castagnino ♦8 |
| 168776955 (Comments: 2) | ChristianA (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hej. That is probably some error in the parsing of the upstream data (NVDB) that is converted into OSM-files for importing. I will manually fix the roads as soon as I can. commented 2025-07-12 09:58:00 UTC by ChristianA ♦42 |
| 166637772 (Comments: 1) | KlubAnDouarSantel (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. The only thing I can find that kind of describes it is this: https://www.toutendroit.com/article-crapen-lomeven-774153/ Could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be Grapen Lomeven?... commented 2025-07-12 09:56:49 UTC by VLD549 ♦287 |
| 168667671 (Comments: 3) | Hervé TUC (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello Hervé TUC, In the rare case that two companies have the same address. You can copy the address info to a new node. This however generally does not happen, ether the new company takes over the old address or one of the two i... commented 2025-07-12 09:56:20 UTC by Tjuro ♦222 |
| 168661333 (Comments: 3) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 51) | OpenStreetMap policy is clear on this. Please refer to this wiki page. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F OpenStreetMap is used by emergency services like BC Wildfire Service, Search & Rescue Asso... commented 2025-07-12 09:46:20 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
 | 168430708 (Comments: 2) | takimo1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, I think there is a typo. STreet --> Street. commented 2025-07-12 09:44:05 UTC by VLD549 ♦287 |
| 168799795 (Comments: 1) | Frans S (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/way/359173825. Shouldn't the tag belong to one of the relations? whereby the one object relation would not be necessary anyway. commented 2025-07-12 09:36:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 167465434 (Comments: 1) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 207) | linia nadal kursuje w wakacyjne słoneczne soboty i niedziele https://ztp.krakow.pl/kmk/komunikaty/1498-2025 https://ztp.krakow.pl/kmk/komunikaty/1443-2025 commented 2025-07-12 09:33:24 UTC by Bartek444 ♦8 |
| 168667550 (Comments: 2) | Hervé TUC (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi, I didn't pay attention, thanks ! commented 2025-07-12 09:32:16 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦31 |
| 161149239 (Comments: 2) | Linie29 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Servus. Sorry, ja das passiert mir manchmal wenn ich über Overpass Turbo die Straßen selektiere und dann nicht drauf schaue ob dann alle Relationen wieder vollständig sind. Ich werd da zukünftig genauer drauf schauen. commented 2025-07-12 09:25:37 UTC by Linie29 ♦41 |
| 149427933 (Comments: 2) | milof (Discussed changesets: 13) | A to cislo nemusi byt na vsetkych budovach. Okrem toho, to asi supisne cislo nebude, kedze supisne 140 v Bratislava-Nove mesto je inde. commented 2025-07-12 09:21:22 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,572 |
| 168742769 (Comments: 1) | Ebruinsma (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert StreetComplete vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168828347 commented 2025-07-12 09:20:22 UTC by Tjuro ♦222 |
| 168799822 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 10) | Redraw the ward/commune-level administrative units for this area instead of deleting them. Please act like a responsible map editor. commented 2025-07-12 09:16:37 UTC by asatoku ♦3 |
| 165276056 (Comments: 3) | OSMchik (Discussed changesets: 33) | скорее всего был сломанный мультиполигон commented 2025-07-12 08:59:10 UTC by literan ♦6,699 |
| 163949558 (Comments: 11) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 144) | Fakt, przypominam sobie znaki na Gądowiance. Czyli mamy 3 polecane drogi na lotnisko, a Strzegomska jest 3 w kolejności. commented 2025-07-12 08:48:43 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,272 |
| 140371071 (Comments: 1) | Klerik7 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Zdravim, preco vymaz nazvov ciest ako Frenkiho cesta (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339740580/ )? Len preto, ze nie su v ZBGISe? Tam asi vela lokalnych nazvov a nazvov cesticiek nebude. Ale je pravda, ze povodny autor ich tiez vykukal z Bingu... commented 2025-07-12 08:42:21 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,572 |
| 153543276 (Comments: 2) | SerendipitousPossum (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, if I recall correctly, it was unlocked. There is also a bus shelter with a toilet in the building by the road. commented 2025-07-12 08:40:57 UTC by SerendipitousPossum ♦3 |
| 140469028 (Comments: 2) | kavousion (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hab diese Änderung in CS 168825854 zurückgesetzt commented 2025-07-12 07:58:29 UTC by map per ♦1,298 |
| 168791413 (Comments: 1) | Captain7571 (Discussed changesets: 1) | اسم یک شهرک روی یک کوچه! مطمئنی؟ commented 2025-07-12 07:47:46 UTC by NotAvailable ♦13 |
| 168803300 (Comments: 1) | brianh (Discussed changesets: 111) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18440 commented 2025-07-12 07:42:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 168795764 (Comments: 2) | m_zahariev (Discussed changesets: 14) | Има наклон, и аз съм слизал по тази пътечка. commented 2025-07-12 07:41:06 UTC by Fraxi ♦130 |
 | 168786007 (Comments: 2) | Povilas3 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Prieš tris savaites pro ten išvažinėjau, ten absoliučiai nieko nebuvo, ir dabar jau padarytas naujas pravažiavimas per mišką? commented 2025-07-12 07:37:02 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 |
| 168732576 (Comments: 2) | fmc_6 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Geht es euch nur um die Aktualität (Immer das Neueste) oder auch um die Qualität (Lesbarkeit Verkehrszeichen)? commented 2025-07-12 07:28:22 UTC by fmc_6 ♦4 |
| 168824906 (Comments: 1) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 20) | apel o pomoc w edycji łomży dla chętnych. dużo tu do roboty ;) commented 2025-07-12 07:21:36 UTC by Bartekkmee ♦3 |
| 168700481 (Comments: 2) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 207) | Poprawię po weekendzie commented 2025-07-12 06:53:10 UTC by kubahahaha ♦396 |
 | 67812258 (Comments: 1) | stouille84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, je ne comprend pas pourquoi vous avez crée cette attraction, il me semble que le osm.org/node/7243098585 est suffisant commented 2025-07-12 06:29:15 UTC by Niquarl ♦1 |
| 49725864 (Comments: 5) | -karlos- (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ist ne Weile her, ja. War nur ein Versuch, falls du vielleicht mal in der Nähe bist oder häufiger mal vorbeikommst. Fixme ist dran und ein Hinweis gesetzt. Wird sich schon irgendwann ergeben, ist ja nichts weltbewegendes an der Stelle ;) commented 2025-07-12 06:25:48 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168760147 (Comments: 2) | iso-lator (Discussed changesets: 11) | Poprawione commented 2025-07-12 06:22:39 UTC by iso-lator ♦7 |
| 168805346 (Comments: 2) | SidiAmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional. #HappyMapping commented 2025-07-12 06:21:03 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
 | 168814919 (Comments: 3) | Piotr Kublicki (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for your map updates. #HappyMapping commented 2025-07-12 06:20:26 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168817670 (Comments: 4) | Fowler High Precision (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/168823538 where the changeset comment is: Remove spam commented 2025-07-12 06:19:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦212 |
| 168575152 (Comments: 1) | Lanmou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Instead of adding a new node, please just update the node that already exists. changeset reverted. commented 2025-07-12 05:48:07 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,044 |
| 168655504 (Comments: 1) | Salt Water by David Myers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM. Your edits have deleted the Dai Nagoya Building object. That's not good, so I reverted and put a separate amenity node. When adding an amenity, if you're not sure about editing the OSM, just add a node. commented 2025-07-12 05:31:26 UTC by okadatsuneo ♦73 |
 | 168799230 (Comments: 1) | likhithakotari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted to remove duplicated highway. commented 2025-07-12 05:30:46 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,856 |
| 168820240 (Comments: 1) | The Hardwood Flooring Pros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-12 03:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 164094244 (Comments: 1) | Lusnoor (Discussed changesets: 12) | These building footpritns are valid but inaccurate; they are generally oversized and should be squared (q). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094244 commented 2025-07-12 03:29:02 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164335455 (Comments: 1) | GHGHGHGHGH (Discussed changesets: 2) | all round buildings are valid and fairly accurate. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164335455 commented 2025-07-12 03:27:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| X | 168819893 (Comments: 1) | SL512 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello SL512, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions! I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in... commented 2025-07-12 03:23:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168719349 (Comments: 2) | oddfoxx (Discussed changesets: 1) | I went ahead and fixed this for you. commented 2025-07-12 03:23:05 UTC by citrula ♦857 |
| 168819727 (Comments: 1) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 74) | hmm, not sure how that happened. sorry about that. commented 2025-07-12 03:06:19 UTC by b-jazz ♦663 |
| 166859427 (Comments: 3) | SurfeurGras (Discussed changesets: 2) | I flagged some accurate and valid footprints. PLease map more like that in future. Thank you for yout contribution. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859427... commented 2025-07-12 02:43:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166859558 (Comments: 1) | SurfeurGras (Discussed changesets: 2) | appropriate highway modificaion. I flagged footpritns that envelope multiple buildings. The L shaped building in the East is quite accurate. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/16685... commented 2025-07-12 02:41:47 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168818232 (Comments: 1) | Pella_Locations_Import (Discussed changesets: 6) | this is in the middle of an intersection. commented 2025-07-12 01:54:44 UTC by citrula ♦857 |
| 168818427 (Comments: 1) | Pella_Locations_Import (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welcome to OSM! Note that there is already a node for Pella Windows and Doors in the correct position. Imports should check for existing objects and add or correct information when necessary. commented 2025-07-12 01:52:10 UTC by MikeN ♦354 |
| 145856498 (Comments: 1) | lorenzs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Lorenz, bent u zeker dat het nieuwe gebouw nr 77 is? Dit bestaat niet op lara/GRB. Het gebouw aan de overkant is blijkbaae 77. commented 2025-07-12 01:50:46 UTC by kabelhaai ♦22 |
| 168818706 (Comments: 1) | Pella_Locations_Import (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18439 commented 2025-07-12 01:48:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 168808789 (Comments: 1) | CJ Arthus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por los aportes. Hago la revision que pediste. Cuando agreges elementos que se supone que son rectangulos o cuadrados, conviene que tambien quede la forma cuadrada en el mapeo. Para eso, segun el editor, tiene una funcion ... commented 2025-07-12 01:40:59 UTC by muralito ♦2,022 |
| 168766507 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 1) | They need "name:ja" Japanese name key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Repeating_name_with_language_specific_tag commented 2025-07-12 01:27:04 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦11 |
| 164090438 (Comments: 1) | Lusnoor (Discussed changesets: 12) | You did well to delete invalid footprints that enveloped multiple buildings, but the footprints you added could have been more accurate and squared (q). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. I... commented 2025-07-12 01:24:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164177642 (Comments: 1) | Claire_Run (Discussed changesets: 3) | You made a good decision to not square all of the corners of the SE footprint. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177642 commented 2025-07-12 01:22:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164177990 (Comments: 1) | Claire_Run (Discussed changesets: 3) | You correctly identified buildings in imagery. Some of these footprints are oversized. You correctly identified the shape of the L shaped building. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2025-07-12 01:19:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164180112 (Comments: 1) | Samu Dark Angel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Most buildings here are valid but inaccurate becasue they are oversized and have not been squared. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164180112 commented 2025-07-12 01:18:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164324998 (Comments: 2) | CaroleKaHa (Discussed changesets: 2) | scratch last. Hold ctrl. to prevent the creation of common nodes. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164324998 commented 2025-07-12 01:17:26 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164325143 (Comments: 1) | CaroleKaHa (Discussed changesets: 2) | You identified buildings in imagery. You deleted valid footprints which could have been modified instead. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164325143 commented 2025-07-12 01:16:24 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166858331 (Comments: 1) | Romane Dubois—Lagny (Discussed changesets: 1) | some of these footprints are well mapped when looking at bing which was used to map them. I recommend aligningit to ESRI so that features are properly aligned. See my project comment. --- Published using ... commented 2025-07-12 01:13:13 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166859574 (Comments: 1) | LOuisO (Discussed changesets: 1) | The footprints I flagged are oversized and sometimes envelope multiple buildings. Map footprints slightly smaller than the roof since it likely overhangs the walls somewhat. --- Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2025-07-12 01:10:25 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166860909 (Comments: 1) | Jaaade B (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's good that you're using multiple sources to aid your interpretation; I recommend that you offset the imagery source before digitising to keep features correctly aligned with one another. In this case the buildings are several meters Wes... commented 2025-07-12 01:02:34 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168745988 (Comments: 1) | bektes03 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, alt_name etiketi alternatif olarak kullanılan isim için kullanılır burada da Bektaşköy, Bektaş bu kısma uyuyor. O yüzden o kısmı geri değiştirdim. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168818280 commented 2025-07-12 01:00:45 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦4 |
| 168765155 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 184) | Alrighty. The portion between Charleston and Sahara is notably wider than the portion between Sahara and Vegas Valley and traverses residential areas. Plus, if I recall correctly, the bus route portion of Charleston continues onto Sahara for a little... commented 2025-07-12 00:43:59 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦51 |
| 168808777 (Comments: 1) | StephanONL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Teruggedraaid vanwege bron die niet is toegestaan. Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4850452 commented 2025-07-12 00:41:25 UTC by A67-A67 ♦932 |
| 168402655 (Comments: 1) | M_boyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | The buildings you added here are likley temporal yurts and should not be mapped as they will likely not be there for long. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the O... commented 2025-07-12 00:40:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168813179 (Comments: 1) | Xaruss18 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979366533 https://www.open... commented 2025-07-12 00:32:33 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168801236 (Comments: 1) | Gienioochgienio (Discussed changesets: 14) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-07-12 00:32:32 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168813046 (Comments: 1) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2289952484 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-07-12 00:32:28 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168802326 (Comments: 1) | StepanZyrianov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Что такое Полка? commented 2025-07-12 00:22:56 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦984 |
| 168787405 (Comments: 1) | tb33 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-07-12 00:22:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168797309 (Comments: 1) | Dawid_P (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-07-12 00:22:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168797867 (Comments: 1) | Dawid_P (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-07-12 00:22:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168790121 (Comments: 1) | grochuu (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-07-12 00:22:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 159484189 (Comments: 1) | Monicalee (Discussed changesets: 1) | You correctly differentiated between round and square buildings. The round building has been appropriately rounded but the square buildings have not been squared and tend to have odd shapes. I recommend watching the missing maps beginer mistakes yout... commented 2025-07-12 00:20:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| X | 168816090 (Comments: 1) | Ana Becerra (Discussed changesets: 2) | next time please try and keep the geographic size of you change set down, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets it would be wonderful if next time you left a more informative change set... commented 2025-07-12 00:18:07 UTC by Udarian ♦411 |
| 166860694 (Comments: 1) | pablo2042 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The footprint I flagged should be L shaped. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860694 commented 2025-07-12 00:09:07 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166860560 (Comments: 1) | pablo2042 (Discussed changesets: 2) | You identified buildings in the imagery and appropriately squared them. The ones I flagged are oversized and sometimes envelope multiple buildings. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2025-07-12 00:08:09 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168758464 (Comments: 1) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 90) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201772019 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-07-12 00:02:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 166858558 (Comments: 1) | leaykn (Discussed changesets: 2) | I do not believe the features I tagged represent buildings visible in imagery but rather yards or parts of them. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858558 commented 2025-07-11 23:52:35 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168744053 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-07-11 23:52:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168736226 (Comments: 1) | makisz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12971243906 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-07-11 23:52:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168732587 (Comments: 1) | Kris74M (Discussed changesets: 56) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413780835 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-07-11 23:52:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 168737575 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 416) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229427625 https://www.open... commented 2025-07-11 23:52:06 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 166858121 (Comments: 1) | leaykn (Discussed changesets: 2) | The geometry of the footpritns you mapped here is generally good, though could be a more accurate at times. Check Changeset: 168817115 to see how I mapped some of these features. Keep in mind that pitched roofs tend to overhang the walls of buildings... commented 2025-07-11 23:50:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 167515107 (Comments: 7) | hayashi (Discussed changesets: 12) | 長文の返信有り難うございます。 前回のあなたからの回答では「JA:Key:name」と「JA:多国語の名称」してくださいとだけ回答されたので、それらから「int_name」を削除する理由が見つ... commented 2025-07-11 23:39:48 UTC by hayashi ♦11 |
| 168707465 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 416) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245272553 https://www.open... commented 2025-07-11 23:32:25 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 166863202 (Comments: 1) | Cotack (Discussed changesets: 1) | The Western Footprint is well mapped more like this in future please. Check Changeset: 168816457 to see how I mapped these buildings. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166863202 |
| 168800303 (Comments: 1) | torque83 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hej, mam prośbę - nazywaj swoje zestawy zmian tak, żeby opisywało to co zostało zmienione. commented 2025-07-11 22:51:52 UTC by IreuN ♦68 |
| 166859212 (Comments: 1) | MAUuD (Discussed changesets: 3) | These footprints are valid but inaccurate. Take care to not include the shadow of a building in its footprint as that makes it oversized. The footprint you deleted is also valid. --- Published using OSMCh... commented 2025-07-11 22:49:25 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166859058 (Comments: 1) | MAUuD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Footprints quite well mapped but could be more accurate. Please read my project comment to see how to modify features after tagging and squaring them. Thanks for your contribution. --- Published using OSM... commented 2025-07-11 22:46:35 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166858219 (Comments: 1) | MAUuD (Discussed changesets: 3) | These footprints are both valid and quite accurate. The northern one is very well mapped. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858219 commented 2025-07-11 22:42:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168816184 (Comments: 1) | rohieb (Discussed changesets: 40) | Die südliche Einfahrt habe ich von highway=track auf highway=service + service=driveway geändert, da es sich hier nicht um einen Wirtschaftsweg handelt, sondern um eine Zufahrt zu einem Haus. commented 2025-07-11 22:40:24 UTC by rohieb ♦108 |
| 168402713 (Comments: 1) | Margaux Larchet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you're generally identifying buildings in the imagery and you improved some of the footpritns here, however some are inaccurate. for example the one in the SE. I previously improved the accuracy of this footprint but the one you repla... commented 2025-07-11 22:30:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166859691 (Comments: 1) | Haïdane Garcin (Discussed changesets: 2) | You correctly identified buildings in imagery but generally mapped them oversized. See my project comment. Please do not add layer tags to 'resolve' overlapping features issues caused by inaccurate geometry. --- ... commented 2025-07-11 22:25:58 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166859603 (Comments: 1) | PaulineKiwi (Discussed changesets: 2) | I flagged some footprints where you mapped only one side/part of the roof. Bear in mind that you are looking from above so you will see roofs. Depending on the orientation of the building and its roofshape it may have light and dark areas. Identify f... commented 2025-07-11 22:20:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166860352 (Comments: 1) | PaulineKiwi (Discussed changesets: 2) | The vast majority of footprints are accurate here, but the round ones are not appropriately shaped. Generally these footprtins are inaccurate becasue you have included the building's shadow in its footprint. Accurate footpritns lead to better po... commented 2025-07-11 22:15:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168814104 (Comments: 1) | ZOZO75 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi ZOZO75, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. Th... commented 2025-07-11 22:06:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168403013 (Comments: 1) | laggoun (Discussed changesets: 3) | You apear to have generally identified buildings in imagery but you have not mapped them accurately. Please focus on making quality contributions that others can build upon. You generaed shared nodes between a building and highway hold alt to prevent... commented 2025-07-11 21:59:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168403391 (Comments: 1) | laggoun (Discussed changesets: 3) | The vast majority of footpritns in the North here are temporal yurts and should not be mapped as they will likely not be there for long. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403391... commented 2025-07-11 21:56:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 167631336 (Comments: 2) | Davlak (Discussed changesets: 29) | Vedo ora anche la fermata Magliana cambiata da railway=halt a railway=station. Come anche Fiera di Roma, Parco Leonardo, Palmiro Togliatti, Tor Sapienza e Tor di Nona. Secondo le mie ricerche nessuna di queste è una stazione, non hanno deviato... commented 2025-07-11 21:51:09 UTC by dieterdreist ♦842 |
| 168404148 (Comments: 1) | laggoun (Discussed changesets: 3) | The square footprints are invalid and inaccurate. You correctly identified round buildings in imagery but they are generally oversized; roofs tend to overhang walls somewhat. Good job modifying the highway to prevent it from overlapping the building... commented 2025-07-11 21:45:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 143204588 (Comments: 4) | jogemu (Discussed changesets: 38) | Upon closer inspection, I reverted most of the ways back to highway=residential. However, being within landuse=residential was not the decisive factor. You should be able to find plenty of highway=unclassified in cities and smaller residential areas.... commented 2025-07-11 21:44:13 UTC by jogemu ♦45 |
| 168581636 (Comments: 3) | gigi2037 (Discussed changesets: 45) | https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=12.52904&lat=41.91728&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes prova con osm inspector erano stazioni non... commented 2025-07-11 21:44:05 UTC by gigi2037 ♦19 |
| 168403209 (Comments: 1) | lmaitre (Discussed changesets: 2) | footprints correctly identified and well mapped, but they should not share nodes with landuse areas nor highways. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data. See my resolution in Changeset: 168815108 --- ... commented 2025-07-11 21:43:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168403009 (Comments: 1) | lmaitre (Discussed changesets: 2) | You correctly identified buildings in the imagery but they are generally slightly oversized. Roofs that you see in aerial imagery tend to overhang the walls of buildings somewhat. --- Published using OSMC... commented 2025-07-11 21:38:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 166795784 (Comments: 1) | Outdoorrookie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Auf die neue Buswendeschleife läuft mittig von Südosten ein Feldweg zu. Dieser Feldweg trägt Routen-Relationen. Diese Relationen funktionieren nur, wenn sie auf ein Ende eines OSM-Weges treffen. Die Busschleife hätte also geteilt ... commented 2025-07-11 21:21:26 UTC by Hb- ♦290 |
| 164324949 (Comments: 1) | LauraB_88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | A generall improvement of map data but some footpritns are still not as accurate as the imagery allows them to be. You correctly deleted footpritns which represented temporal yurts. --- Published using OS... commented 2025-07-11 21:21:02 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168098562 (Comments: 1) | cr85 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, pouvez-vous svp être plus précis dans vos commentaires ? Cela aiderait à comprendre ce qui se passe quand, comme moi, on cherche à comprendre pourquoi un itinéraire pédestre a été... commented 2025-07-11 21:20:25 UTC by StC ♦254 |
| 164325125 (Comments: 1) | LauraB_88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | You improved the accuracy of all building footprints here and added valid and accurate footprints. Well done! Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that ... commented 2025-07-11 21:19:02 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168403533 (Comments: 1) | Clara Lafon (Discussed changesets: 1) | A valid but oversized footprint. Please see my project comment about accurate footprint mapping. See Changeset: 168814513 for how I mapped it. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmc... commented 2025-07-11 21:15:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 167969462 (Comments: 1) | Jean-Pierre Rondeau (Discussed changesets: 32) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là - un cas classique d'ajout d'un nœud à un way au-delà de son point de jonction avec un ... commented 2025-07-11 21:09:52 UTC by StC ♦254 |
| 166858686 (Comments: 1) | Manon Marseille (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you improved these footprints by squaring them but they share nodes with other features. Please watch the missing maps beginer mistakes videos for demos on how to resolve such issues. --- Publi... commented 2025-07-11 20:57:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168402809 (Comments: 1) | Guillaume Danjou (Discussed changesets: 1) | You correctly identified round buildings from the correct imagery source, however they are generally oversized. Please see my project comments to see how to scale features to make them an accurate size. --- ... commented 2025-07-11 20:54:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164094794 (Comments: 1) | Lusnoor (Discussed changesets: 12) | You correctly identified buildings but the footprints you digitise are inaccurate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback f... commented 2025-07-11 20:48:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164178720 (Comments: 1) | Antoine02 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Well done you imprvoed the accuracy of these footprints by appropriately squaring them. They could still be more accurate. Generally the footprint can be a bit smaller than the roof. --- Published using O... commented 2025-07-11 20:48:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 4920887 (Comments: 1) | kleiner_Thomas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Leider ist die Sparda Bank ausgezogen commented 2025-07-11 20:21:34 UTC by Josef73 ♦273 |
| 168727083 (Comments: 1) | cantece (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello! Thank you for adding waterways! You can use the "USGS 3D Elevation Map" and "National Map Topographic" base layers to get better alignment of the streams. commented 2025-07-11 20:20:10 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦18 |
| 166190066 (Comments: 4) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ešte by som skúsil prieskum na mieste, či tam fakt nie je v okolí nejaká nová náučná tabuľa. commented 2025-07-11 20:03:57 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦24 |
 | 167696780 (Comments: 1) | 1Mmarek (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, there are no longer any traces of the railway sections you added on the ground, so they shouldn't be added. commented 2025-07-11 19:37:38 UTC by Samuele Battarra ♦61 |
| 168746791 (Comments: 2) | OSMchik (Discussed changesets: 33) | Здравствуйте! Исправил commented 2025-07-11 19:28:31 UTC by OSMchik ♦20 |
| 151663432 (Comments: 4) | SonOfZenMaster (Discussed changesets: 12) | Szia, Igen, az üveg gyűjtőt elvitte a MOHU idén év elején. Törlöm s ha vissza kerül ( időpontot nem írtak mikor) újra felvehető, Off topic: Zugló önkormányzata t&o... commented 2025-07-11 19:23:21 UTC by SonOfZenMaster ♦5 |
| 168582995 (Comments: 1) | Murali3 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello You've written "added tags" in the changeset comment here, but that doesn't really help other OSM mappers understand what you changed and what the source was. It would be great if you could use a bit more detail! B... commented 2025-07-11 19:20:59 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168811343 (Comments: 1) | kabelhaai (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4686334 commented 2025-07-11 19:18:28 UTC by kabelhaai ♦22 |
| 168744151 (Comments: 4) | wies1 (Discussed changesets: 121) | Supi, danke für die schnelle Korrektur :) commented 2025-07-11 19:13:59 UTC by os-emmer ♦340 |
| 168762191 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 51) | No worries. Getting these Indigenous names into OSM is really great work! commented 2025-07-11 19:06:05 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168797861 (Comments: 1) | Jakub_Gorski (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hej, to jest duplikat już istniejących parkingów - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167751763 commented 2025-07-11 19:05:46 UTC by Omikorin ♦3 |
| 168752205 (Comments: 1) | Iola Gardens llc (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: farmland is based on where the crops are grown, not on property boundaries. In this case the farm house and some of its buildings are show as farmland. Those are usually tagged as landuse=farmyard. Can you review this edit? --- |
| 147985933 (Comments: 3) | gncrK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Powiem ci, że to było na tyle dawno temu, że już nie pamiętam co wtedy było gdy to robiłem. Wtedy chyba zaczynała się budowa osiedla, a według planów sądziłem, że od razu tamte fragmenty będą budowane, zarówno drogowe jak... commented 2025-07-11 19:00:42 UTC by gncrK ♦1 |
| 168810717 (Comments: 1) | SantanaVII (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dear SantanaVII, thank you for your contributions to OSM. Could you be a little more specific with your changeset comments, and in the future explain what you corrected, instead of just writing "correction"? See also: https://wiki.openstree... commented 2025-07-11 19:00:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,430 |
 | 168720707 (Comments: 2) | HamiDesert (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi rarad74, thanks for making those updates! commented 2025-07-11 18:59:00 UTC by HamiDesert ♦7 |
| 168617875 (Comments: 2) | dx125 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Oh, da bin ich irgendwie verrutscht ;-) "name=Klimastation Neuenhammer" berichtigt. Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2025-07-11 18:56:20 UTC by dx125 ♦126 |
| 92387519 (Comments: 4) | SanJuanRidge (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/168810519 commented 2025-07-11 18:51:52 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦344 |
| 166641756 (Comments: 3) | habi (Discussed changesets: 375) | > Die Velostation am Bahnhof in Bern ist z.B. mit capacity=200 getaggt (osm.org/node/824801815), auf deren Website unter https://www.bern.ch/velostation-bern steht "Velostation Bern: 2'660 Veloabstellplätze mit 24-Stunden-Zugang am ... commented 2025-07-11 18:50:56 UTC by habi ♦1,846 |
| 157514641 (Comments: 6) | Mond00 (Discussed changesets: 76) | ist auch korrigiert commented 2025-07-11 18:42:52 UTC by Mond00 ♦76 |
| 168739878 (Comments: 1) | eireidium (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927228930/history This path is gone at least 20 years. Hence mapped as abandoned:highway=footway commented 2025-07-11 18:37:08 UTC by VictorIE ♦911 |
| 22113602 (Comments: 1) | radmar (Discussed changesets: 19) | Co niby trzeba przeliczyć w temacie przepompowni https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279223583 ? :D commented 2025-07-11 18:30:50 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦130 |
| 168663659 (Comments: 1) | Majed Maktari (Discussed changesets: 1) | I see you changed the phone number including it's formatting. The +1 should be included in phone numbers on OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone I know in the US we don't typically see the +1, but it's technically ... commented 2025-07-11 18:28:53 UTC by jgon6 ♦120 |
| 168652885 (Comments: 1) | LordElwood (Discussed changesets: 2) | Isn't this a single building? I have seen it go up, and I'm pretty sure it's a single structure. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168652885 commented 2025-07-11 18:22:08 UTC by jgon6 ♦120 |
| 168808819 (Comments: 1) | xyzxyz15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi xyzxyz15, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. ... commented 2025-07-11 18:17:02 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 167285870 (Comments: 3) | pedalhoppy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi pedalhoppy, Respectfully, I wouldn't exactly call this name "common". Now I'm not a cyclist, but I've heard of and know where e.g. Sideshow Bob is. However, I've *never* heard the name "Shlooshway". I... commented 2025-07-11 17:57:19 UTC by hoserab ♦194 |
| 144096320 (Comments: 1) | Pineappleswordtail16 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good changeset comment, size and theme. In future where practicable please state the sources of the information. Aerial imagery was probably used to identify the roads and align map them but the speed limit signs are not directly visible in the aeria... commented 2025-07-11 17:48:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 168807648 (Comments: 1) | JeremiahLee (Discussed changesets: 1) | This was a mistake based on bad UI of the app. Should be undone. commented 2025-07-11 17:48:39 UTC by JeremiahLee ♦1 |
| 168805925 (Comments: 1) | Tim Miller of Finland (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Tim Miller of Finland, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the co... commented 2025-07-11 17:46:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168300057 (Comments: 1) | PcMouse1 (Discussed changesets: 18) | how did you manage to get that layer to work? i'm curious and it keeps giving me "Error: Parameter Layers is missing" commented 2025-07-11 17:39:11 UTC by Rhodez ♦9 |
| 168740081 (Comments: 1) | Magivate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for starting to update the speeds on some of the roads. I have already updated the road segments impacted by the new school zone speed limits around the city but have not done a larger update of the general speed limit on all roads. If you use... commented 2025-07-11 17:34:41 UTC by JessAk71 ♦117 |
| 168793508 (Comments: 1) | sanjanasharma_lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Sanjana, FYI I have deleted this turn restriction because it's not necessary. The 'to' element in the relation you added is already a one-way road that only allows traffic from the 'from' element to turn right. I ha... commented 2025-07-11 17:21:18 UTC by hoserab ♦194 |
| 140773555 (Comments: 2) | phodgkin (Discussed changesets: 34) | I thought that was probably the case, but best to get local knowledge. Fixed! commented 2025-07-11 17:20:21 UTC by phodgkin ♦62 |
| 75413900 (Comments: 1) | hvalentim (Discussed changesets: 36) | Posto Meteorológico foi tagado como landuse=commercial, tourism=attraction, suspeita-se que com intenção de mapear para o render, tags foram corrigidas. commented 2025-07-11 17:19:17 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦195 |
| 168798945 (Comments: 1) | Victor Samuelsson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vad exakt är "ditt uppdrag"? commented 2025-07-11 17:18:18 UTC by simer_lkpg ♦9 |
| 168714627 (Comments: 1) | Jesse-R (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hier gebeuren een aantal vreemde dingen: - De failliete vervoerder Blue Amigo wordt weer toegevoegd aan de waterbuslijnen. Dit was eerder dit jaar veranderd naar Aqualiner. - De Driehoeksveer wordt toegevoegd aan de concessie Personenvervoer ov... commented 2025-07-11 17:06:35 UTC by A67-A67 ♦932 |
| 168711963 (Comments: 4) | 2019XCR (Discussed changesets: 2) | I didn't see you referenced the 16th hole. Thanks for fixing that. I did most of 1-9 and fixed those. I plan on going through the rest of the back 9 this weekend. I worked on Deerfield Golf Club (Brockport NY) a few years back and I honestly f... commented 2025-07-11 17:00:54 UTC by 2019XCR ♦2 |
| 168794330 (Comments: 1) | TuscParks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, next time instead of deleting data from OSM, just correct the way type. If this is a driveway, change it to a driveway type, and tag it private. commented 2025-07-11 16:37:21 UTC by MassCartog ♦126 |
| 168749415 (Comments: 2) | Matthew0903 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Carpark corner node resolved in below changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168768992 Footpath nodes resolved in below changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168805368 For bicycle access tags, see comments... commented 2025-07-11 16:37:16 UTC by MorahT ♦23 |
| 168748479 (Comments: 3) | Matthew0903 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for confirming. While it's wide enough to be a shared path, I can't see any physical signs, ground markings or other information (such as the Swindon Travel Choices/Wichelstowe websites, etc.) indicating bicycles have access righ... commented 2025-07-11 16:34:45 UTC by MorahT ♦23 |
| 168617025 (Comments: 1) | nmeum (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is a "false one-way street" with a no-entry sign located at the intersection of Berdingstraße and Brackebuschstraße (preventing entry into Brackebuschstraße from Berdingstraße). However, the recommendations for ... commented 2025-07-11 16:33:47 UTC by nmeum ♦1 |
| 168485385 (Comments: 1) | Arie den Boon (Discussed changesets: 14) | I flagged a few footprints that look like they envelope multiple buildings. I mapped some of these in chageset 168805126 so you can see my interpretation. ---Take care to not include the walls of buildings in the size and shape of the footprint in Bi... commented 2025-07-11 16:30:57 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
| 164039662 (Comments: 3) | Flaon (Discussed changesets: 2) | no to kasuję healthcare=pharmacy commented 2025-07-11 16:30:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
 | 161019272 (Comments: 2) | relaemanila (Discussed changesets: 46) | Good evening. Yes, Mega Paraw is indeed a travel agency (as experienced) that uses this route to transport passengers to Nabaoy and to Boracay. I will try to change the type of relation to a public transport relation. commented 2025-07-11 16:25:34 UTC by relaemanila ♦52 |
| 168519532 (Comments: 1) | BasCor (Discussed changesets: 3) | Deze POI stond al in Openstreetmap. Daarom verwijderd. commented 2025-07-11 16:17:33 UTC by A67-A67 ♦932 |
| 166019538 (Comments: 1) | ForstBW 920 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo forst_bw, das bedeutet nicht, dass das als footway gemapped werden sollte. Bitte erst mal die entsprechenden Abschnitte im wiki lesen. Viele Grüße, Reiner commented 2025-07-11 16:15:54 UTC by *abq* ♦135 |
| 131799606 (Comments: 2) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 953) | (see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4850232 ) commented 2025-07-11 15:53:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168079750 (Comments: 1) | Aicka Mae (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits! The tag landuse=farmland is intended for low growing crops like rice or corn. For areas mostly planted with coconuts you can use landuse=orchard + trees=coconut_palms, no need to add a descripton in t... commented 2025-07-11 15:50:03 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦152 |
| X | 168803504 (Comments: 1) | ToniE (Discussed changesets: 227) | soundtrips -> round-trips commented 2025-07-11 15:48:15 UTC by ToniE ♦1,233 |
| 168800715 (Comments: 4) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 145) | Hallo! Vor meiner Änderung gab es den Knoten doppelt an der selben Stelle. Daher habe ich Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12989346224 gemerged mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/43641823#map=19/52.025266/8.513235,... commented 2025-07-11 15:47:47 UTC by ratrun ♦233 |
| 168803437 (Comments: 1) | IrynaStaradub (Discussed changesets: 14) | Not added road. Added one way tag of the road. commented 2025-07-11 15:46:50 UTC by IrynaStaradub ♦14 |
| 168779298 (Comments: 1) | Grzegorz2491 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Jesteś pewien że droga polna przy ścieżce rowerowej wzdłuż wału jest zrobiona z kostki brukowej? Powinno być surface=ground i grade3/4. commented 2025-07-11 15:19:31 UTC by Eye1024 ♦10 |
| 168801109 (Comments: 1) | YuliyaSurta (Discussed changesets: 51) | Wrong source was mentioned. Used National Agriculture Imagery Program and USGS 3D Elevation Program as evidence. commented 2025-07-11 14:55:42 UTC by YuliyaSurta ♦51 |
| X | 168800513 (Comments: 1) | Chacalaca (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is a follow up to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168800376#map=19/45.554602/-73.554580 commented 2025-07-11 14:43:54 UTC by Chacalaca ♦1 |
| 168796836 (Comments: 1) | SIA "4SPA" (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jūs aizmirsāt pārvietot punktu uz jauno adresi. Ja šādi atstāsiet, tad adrešu bots nomainīs atpakaļ uz veco adresi. commented 2025-07-11 14:35:07 UTC by somehundred ♦101 |
| 156588518 (Comments: 4) | waldhans (Discussed changesets: 87) | P.S. Die Parkplätze auf den Karten werden mit (P) angezeigt commented 2025-07-11 14:16:05 UTC by Znaika ♦112 |
| 168798454 (Comments: 1) | Sandra von Gneisenau Salon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-11 14:04:17 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 144459666 (Comments: 1) | Мири (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for your contribution in Turkmenistan ! How do you know that this building is number 541 on its street? commented 2025-07-11 14:03:45 UTC by Koreller ♦48 |
| 160814065 (Comments: 2) | Leo Slager (Discussed changesets: 159) | Yes. Opening is expected at 11 october. commented 2025-07-11 14:01:10 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 166469045 (Comments: 3) | jlgay38 (Discussed changesets: 1) | so culvert at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512899586 is wrong and should be replaced with mapping a bridge, right? commented 2025-07-11 13:58:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168781781 (Comments: 1) | Go N Bananas Family Fun Center (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please help me, what exactly was so incorrect that you had to delete the building instead of correcting it? commented 2025-07-11 13:47:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168788590 (Comments: 2) | Hidden Mountain (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ага, самый бесящий неадекват среди местных мапперов commented 2025-07-11 13:40:38 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦16 |
| 168385533 (Comments: 2) | Erwin (VRG) (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ik heb de classificatie tertiary op dit stuk teruggezet commented 2025-07-11 13:25:02 UTC by the-wouter ♦23 |
| 168795312 (Comments: 1) | Ernie C (Discussed changesets: 14) | I deleted a Shell station I shouldn't have. I fixed it in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168796625 commented 2025-07-11 13:24:14 UTC by Ernie C ♦12 |
| 168795785 (Comments: 1) | Pritee02AshokHalder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pritee02AshokHalder, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comm... commented 2025-07-11 13:17:17 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168612507 (Comments: 3) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 103) | TurnRestrictions sind nun ergänzt. commented 2025-07-11 13:13:17 UTC by chris66 ♦367 |
| 167938311 (Comments: 1) | ramshi04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Ramshi. I noticed that you replaced amenity=college with landuse=education. Please note that amenity=college did already imply landuse=education, as stated on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcollege. Please do not delete existin... commented 2025-07-11 13:07:02 UTC by KhubsuratInsaan ♦10 |
| 167858753 (Comments: 1) | Ben2007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour merci pour les ajouts. J'ai un petit doute sur le parc aquatique à l'intérieur d'un bâtiment... ?? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12927611102 Est-ce une erreur de positionnement du point ou ... commented 2025-07-11 13:06:14 UTC by Patchanka ♦385 |
| 168781619 (Comments: 1) | Sotavento (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, wurde die Antenne komplett entfernt oder ist die nur außer Betrieb? commented 2025-07-11 12:59:12 UTC by geow ♦447 |
| 168744162 (Comments: 1) | PQ027 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por editar, se han quedado un par de etiquetas como: add:street2 addr:housenumber2 en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413831180/history es mejor colocar en nodos independientes la información de cada portal, es ... commented 2025-07-11 12:58:03 UTC by aTarom ♦775 |
| 131954474 (Comments: 1) | domi_nick (Discussed changesets: 10) | Czyli https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3388123054/history jest do skasowania jako trwale zamknięty? commented 2025-07-11 12:56:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 161413588 (Comments: 1) | Stef-NWB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sol der brücke wieder mal befahrbar werden oder gehen alle bussen permanent eine andere route fahren? commented 2025-07-11 12:47:55 UTC by sef43 ♦9 |
| 168791888 (Comments: 1) | 666L CHURROS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the information. I had planned to relocate the venue in September but let’s do it now, then. Just one thing, please never add fake addresses to places, that just corrupts the addressing system. If the point is located in A... commented 2025-07-11 12:35:32 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 167689572 (Comments: 4) | Pedra (Discussed changesets: 6) | Grazie a te, attrazione è più adeguato rispetto a "monumento" commented 2025-07-11 12:27:04 UTC by Pedra ♦5 |
| 149500922 (Comments: 2) | der neue (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo Michael, danke für den Hinweis, ich habs entsprechend korrigiert. Viele Grüße Manfred commented 2025-07-11 12:19:42 UTC by der neue ♦6 |
| 48673781 (Comments: 1) | Ralphie Raccoon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4849890 ? commented 2025-07-11 12:18:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 69670026 (Comments: 1) | dudone (Discussed changesets: 94) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4849889#map=15/53.00729/-1.51240 ? commented 2025-07-11 12:18:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 139261466 (Comments: 1) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 24) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4849892#map=15/52.69386/-2.76897&layers=N ? commented 2025-07-11 12:16:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168793109 (Comments: 1) | Energyg542 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-11 12:15:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168746928 (Comments: 2) | fmc_8 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich vermisse außerdem traffic_mode, da rechts parkende Kfz vorhanden sind. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168746928 commented 2025-07-11 12:14:13 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦11 |
| 168792501 (Comments: 1) | fmc_7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Auf Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156346067 scheint ein Schreibfehler zu sein. Andere Tags, wie bspw. tactile_paving brauchst du nicht zu erfassen. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.or... commented 2025-07-11 12:11:55 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦11 |
| 168779920 (Comments: 4) | ThoughtsMatter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Den Eindruck hatte ich, bin aber absolut kein OSM-Profi. Wenn da jetzt noch nur eine (:-D) Tür drin ist, hätte aber aus meiner Sicht alles seine Richtigkeit. commented 2025-07-11 12:01:05 UTC by ThoughtsMatter ♦1 |
| 168784697 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 103) | DWG has photo of "Privat – Ingen adgang" sign where track branches off Århusvej. commented 2025-07-11 12:00:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,430 |
| 168786229 (Comments: 1) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 43) | Comentario del conjunto de cambios: Añadir nombres multilíngües name:es y name:ca commented 2025-07-11 11:35:33 UTC by Robot8A ♦69 |
| 168786379 (Comments: 1) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 43) | Comentario del conjunto de cambios: Añadir nombres multilíngües name:es y name:ca commented 2025-07-11 11:35:31 UTC by Robot8A ♦69 |
| 168143476 (Comments: 2) | gwselke (Discussed changesets: 3) | Děkuji za upozornění, Kubo! Prověřím to (po dovolené). commented 2025-07-11 11:33:09 UTC by gwselke ♦3 |
| 168732431 (Comments: 1) | fmc_6 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Aktuelles Mapillary Bild gilt auch hier. Auch wenn die Aussage gleich ist, wäre https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2597246357279953 besser geeignet. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... commented 2025-07-11 11:24:54 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦11 |
| 168790011 (Comments: 1) | quadrosmiglcrosbypllctx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-11 11:09:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168743806 (Comments: 4) | Dave Stret (Discussed changesets: 5) | hi there, no worries, i figured it was something like that. Your changeset comment made your intentions clear, which is very helpful and made it easy to fix :) in your editor, you can for example add the tag access=private to the part of ... commented 2025-07-11 11:08:20 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
 | 168758534 (Comments: 1) | Ammar Alotoom (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, please do not add test data to osm.org. I have reverted your edits. In some cases, the testing environment at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org can be an alterantive https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168790004 commented 2025-07-11 11:05:21 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
| 168789477 (Comments: 1) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 3) | I have made the change as an exception since there is geometric separation of road axes, and navigational guides would fail to notify the lane change in time. commented 2025-07-11 10:59:07 UTC by World_Winner ♦3 |
| 168748660 (Comments: 1) | m0rphU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, hier ist / war keine Lücke in der Höchstgeschwindigkeit. Die Höchstgeschwindigkeit variiert je nach Fahrtrichtung. Deshalb wurde bereits maxspeed:forward und maxspeed:backward gesetzt. Ein maxspeed zusätzlich ist deshalb ni... commented 2025-07-11 10:30:16 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,862 |
| 167086121 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_HHanh (Discussed changesets: 5) | pls help me check the restriction relation/19203195 correct or not? commented 2025-07-11 10:29:16 UTC by tuan_gsm ♦23 |
 | 168782184 (Comments: 1) | ReDokoMapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please do not upload test data to openstreetmap.org. I have reverted your edits. You may in some cases use https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ for testing, if you are developing a new editor for example. Cheers David htt... commented 2025-07-11 10:28:21 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
| 168788131 (Comments: 1) | taewookeum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi taewookeum, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field... commented 2025-07-11 10:26:57 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168763884 (Comments: 2) | Autopistero20502020 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Pues ya se sabe: se han abierto los dos tramos sin nomenclatura, con señalización provisional. La numeración de las salidas sí que es la definitiva, siguiendo la kilometración de la A-30. commented 2025-07-11 10:25:54 UTC by dsaneus ♦16 |
| 168778529 (Comments: 6) | Glocke-Oelde (Discussed changesets: 15) | Aus dem Grund habe ich nur den Wegepunkt gesetzt ohne Tags zu ändern. So kann OSM-basierte Routenführung weiterhin da durch und ich habe damit aber die Möglichkeit in unserer Software die Durchfahrt für unsere Zusteller zu sperren... commented 2025-07-11 10:21:45 UTC by Glocke-Oelde ♦14 |
| 168736090 (Comments: 2) | patzi (Discussed changesets: 23) | Nach Foto aus https://www.goslarsche.de/lokales/erste-fahrradstrasse-landkreis-goslar-671541.html noch keine Fahrradstraße somit nur bicycle=yes --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... commented 2025-07-11 10:12:38 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,315 |
| 168628878 (Comments: 1) | kharismaanindia (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi kharismaanindia, Looking at this changeset, it looks like you deleted some parts of the street and the footway that goes into this complex. Any particular reason for doing so? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168628878 commented 2025-07-11 09:46:45 UTC by CJJ2501 ♦18 |
| 168757021 (Comments: 2) | Kraeson (Discussed changesets: 1) | I accidentally created the path incorrectly commented 2025-07-11 09:15:00 UTC by Kraeson ♦1 |
| 168743732 (Comments: 1) | Cesca Brint (Discussed changesets: 2) | Unless pedestrian access is explicitly prohibited with a traffic sign and associated traffic order, it is not illegal to walk on any public road in the UK. Access tags in OSM reflect the legal position, not an opinion on whether or not it might be sa... commented 2025-07-11 09:13:12 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,478 |
| 168650292 (Comments: 2) | JvS-68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank voor je welkom en mail met tops Leo. M vr gr, Johan commented 2025-07-11 09:11:01 UTC by JvS-68 ♦1 |
| 168662660 (Comments: 1) | tg4567 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Spätes update - aber routing sagt Ja ;) Rot alt - Grün neu. https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1045515,1082252 commented 2025-07-11 09:10:26 UTC by flohoff ♦2,364 |
| 168784727 (Comments: 1) | carlitoon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-11 09:09:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168780450 (Comments: 1) | yzuio (Discussed changesets: 1) | 明天也要加油哦！ commented 2025-07-11 09:09:31 UTC by monhiko ♦34 |
| 168761707 (Comments: 1) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 157) | Moin, good catch hier - hab erst ein wenig gerätselt aber auf den Ampeln fehlten die forward/backwards ;) Scheint auch bei oneways einen unterschied zu machen - sehr seltsam. Vermutlich ein Bug im OSRM. https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1... commented 2025-07-11 09:06:49 UTC by flohoff ♦2,364 |
| 168784638 (Comments: 1) | Simona Magnani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-11 09:06:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 144141153 (Comments: 3) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 84) | OK, thanks. Done in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168784528 commented 2025-07-11 08:59:32 UTC by Casey_boy ♦83 |
| 168777566 (Comments: 1) | Refteck Solution (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removing the highway=trunk tag from part of the Westbound carriageway of the A232 Barclay Road doesn't strike me as being particularly professional. If this hadn't been fixed promptly, it would have caused problems for OSM-based routing sof... commented 2025-07-11 08:57:45 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,478 |
| 140321605 (Comments: 3) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 123) | shop=office_equipment ? There is quite a lot of confusion with office/shop tagging so maybe more verbosity would be a good idea? Or maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doffice should be documented at wiki as perfectly fine valu... commented 2025-07-11 08:44:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 167509405 (Comments: 5) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 263) | Faktycznie import powinien dawać wskaźnik levels. Nie pamiętam, czy jak ja wgrywałem bryły wtyczką BuildingsPL, to czy wskoczyły te wartości. Chyba nie, bo patrząc na to, że w twoim zestawie zmian doszły adresy dla pawilonów, to mus... commented 2025-07-11 08:40:11 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦130 |
| 168762764 (Comments: 1) | ryjówka (Discussed changesets: 2) | O, to ci ciekawostka! 👍 commented 2025-07-11 08:34:26 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦130 |
 | 168126531 (Comments: 1) | GrabTH_Thamolvan (Discussed changesets: 6) | This area has been converted to the student residence with multiple buildings since 2024, and the existing imagery does not apply to this area's current development. commented 2025-07-11 08:12:23 UTC by ppnplus ♦12 |
| 168640767 (Comments: 2) | Jorisbo (Discussed changesets: 187) | Hallo Johsin, i changed it, regards Joris commented 2025-07-11 07:08:56 UTC by Jorisbo ♦144 |
| 164059217 (Comments: 4) | TereseWilcock123456789 (Discussed changesets: 4) | ok thanks, the boundary has changed here aproximately 2 years ago commented 2025-07-11 07:07:03 UTC by TereseWilcock123456789 ♦3 |
| 147973163 (Comments: 2) | Gemeinde Schwangau (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the correction and the clarification regarding motor_vehicle=designated. I appreciate you taking the time to fix the tag and explain the correct usage. commented 2025-07-11 07:06:34 UTC by Gemeinde Schwangau ♦1 |
| 33898324 (Comments: 1) | nickbarker (Discussed changesets: 6) | HI, This does not look to form a single route? Might be a collection of ways that a government website uses to generate a route? commented 2025-07-11 07:02:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,666 |
| 168768831 (Comments: 5) | small_dragon (Discussed changesets: 1) | well, for context, i used the city data available from https://www.welland.ca/Maps/PropPages/streets/Claremount-Circle.htm to try and mark the building numbers more accurately instead of the inaccurate noting that is there. the existing denotation ma... commented 2025-07-11 07:01:58 UTC by small_dragon ♦1 |
| 168748622 (Comments: 1) | Karnivor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Do you have the name in Georgian? If so, please add it to the name field instead of English one. I already added English name to the specific field. commented 2025-07-11 07:00:48 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦119 |
| 167696201 (Comments: 1) | DenchikBorovoy2011 (Discussed changesets: 3) | не надо рисовать вымышленные "тоннели" под путепроводами. почитайте, что такое тоннель. исправлю. commented 2025-07-11 06:54:26 UTC by literan ♦6,699 |
| 168778126 (Comments: 1) | Refteck Solution (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-11 06:34:32 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168739029 (Comments: 1) | Tania Y Yang (Discussed changesets: 1) | 這應該不是整棟都是GBA吧，如果只有一部分，宜用點來代表餐廳 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168739029 commented 2025-07-11 06:12:28 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,446 |
| 168775091 (Comments: 2) | TereseWilcock123456789 (Discussed changesets: 4) | just deleting nodes to realign a boundary. I'm not finished yet but it's not a mistake commented 2025-07-11 05:54:54 UTC by TereseWilcock123456789 ♦3 |
| 168773047 (Comments: 1) | cotruststaxes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-11 05:28:23 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168718767 (Comments: 1) | sbohrer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I'd just like to inform you that Esri World Imagery has the most up-to-date data in the Williamson County area as of right now. You can change the aerial imagery layer by pressing B (or clicking the la... commented 2025-07-11 05:24:19 UTC by mewhenthe ♦3 |
| 94200152 (Comments: 2) | ququruzka (Discussed changesets: 32) | L'ajout de name:fr à partir de name est inutile pour un pays dont la langue officielle est le français (cas de la France) commented 2025-07-11 05:21:04 UTC by pyrog ♦337 |
| 168768699 (Comments: 1) | Rukkhadevata (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello. It has been agreed in the Korean community that the name should include the word '특별시' (and '광역시', '도', '시' etc) Please refer https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/85627 commented 2025-07-11 04:51:30 UTC by honnip ♦5 |
| 157299587 (Comments: 1) | Dima01243 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Теги addr:country и addr:city являются избыточными, так как объекты внутри административных границ наследуют от них свои атрибуты. Не стоит их доб... commented 2025-07-11 04:33:23 UTC by SvM ♦22 |
| 159520761 (Comments: 1) | ArgyleZombie (Discussed changesets: 12) | Did QT's headquarters expand or move? commented 2025-07-11 04:27:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,117 |
| 168755842 (Comments: 1) | Chlxrb123* (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reverted this changeset because it dragged highways out of position. This could have disrupted routing. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-07-11 04:12:04 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,856 |
| 167636062 (Comments: 5) | rkdclgh (Discussed changesets: 12) | 네 확인했습니다. 충분한 의견 개진 및 도출된 합의 사항 없이 성급하게 바꿨다는 점에 동의하며, 불요한 논란을 일으키지 않기 위해 해당 부분 관련하여 추가적인 편집 및 수정은 하고 ... commented 2025-07-11 03:38:07 UTC by rkdclgh ♦8 |
 | 106985310 (Comments: 2) | guillemmal (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hola si quieres editarlas adelante! Me pase en una imagen de sentinel de muy baja calidad! Cambia como te parezca mejor! Cero drama! commented 2025-07-11 02:25:08 UTC by guillemmal ♦44 |
 | 168760723 (Comments: 1) | rositaibañezchoque (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, bienvenida al mapa! Vi que cambiaste la categoría de una calle de barrio a "carretera" y luego cambiaste el césped a "bosque", obviamente son errores muy comunes que muy probablemente es porque aú... commented 2025-07-11 02:24:58 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,574 |
| 164877868 (Comments: 1) | Jay0410 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why does this line have no other tags besides name? Also, the only source I can find for this is https://www.elections.ca/map_02.aspx?lang=e&p=06_ON&t=/1Dis/35010&d=35010, of which the existing boundary seems to already use: https://www.o... commented 2025-07-11 01:36:25 UTC by democat ♦3 |
| 168759397 (Comments: 1) | hoserab (Discussed changesets: 42) | ... and split up 20th Street north of 33rd, to reflect the island in the middle that prevents traffic from turning left into/out of the parking lot at the "Marda Loop Centre" retail area. Seems my change summary got cut off/I accidentally s... commented 2025-07-11 00:27:12 UTC by hoserab ♦194 |
| 168716459 (Comments: 2) | nmac85 (Discussed changesets: 45) | OK will try to avoid this in future. commented 2025-07-11 00:24:26 UTC by nmac85 ♦7 |
| 162908444 (Comments: 2) | UAFAB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, j'ai retiré, l'occupation n'est plus d'actualité et je ne pense pas que les occupations successives durent assez longtemps pour être cartographiées. commented 2025-07-11 00:17:28 UTC by m-ezd ♦9 |
| 168450812 (Comments: 1) | febaac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Este lugar esta marcado como si fuera un edificio donde se imparten clases universitarias, sin embargo aquí se encuentran parte de las oficinas administrativas de la UDELAR. commented 2025-07-11 00:04:03 UTC by febaac ♦1 |
| 168762219 (Comments: 1) | greenBauble (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не, вы всё правильно в первый раз сделали. Не нужно ещё раз обводить. Просто карта не успела перерисоваться. commented 2025-07-11 00:04:01 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦984 |
| 168753717 (Comments: 1) | dsmntr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168764802 commented 2025-07-10 23:59:18 UTC by Bienson ♦298 |
| 168762741 (Comments: 1) | dsmntr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168764791 commented 2025-07-10 23:58:32 UTC by Bienson ♦298 |
| 168417505 (Comments: 2) | jnheng03 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - suspected sock-puppet https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168764774 commented 2025-07-10 23:57:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 168417398 (Comments: 1) | jnheng03 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - suspected sock-puppet https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168764774 commented 2025-07-10 23:57:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 168417476 (Comments: 1) | jnheng03 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - suspected sock-puppet https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168764774 commented 2025-07-10 23:57:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 163769386 (Comments: 1) | GR-menneke (Discussed changesets: 33) | houthakkersstraat: was 1-richting. Nu gesloten voor iedereen behalve buurtbewoners. access=no ? commented 2025-07-10 23:40:24 UTC by kabelhaai ♦22 |
| 168717791 (Comments: 3) | SomeoneElse2 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hah, yes, I can see how that could happen. Thanks for fixing it (For anyone else who reads this, it was fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168764186) commented 2025-07-10 23:28:32 UTC by gurglypipe ♦873 |
| 167109893 (Comments: 2) | Zarrink (Discussed changesets: 1) | because they form the main part of the highway, they don't merge into other lanes commented 2025-07-10 23:19:12 UTC by Zarrink ♦1 |
| 168483559 (Comments: 2) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 149) | It seems to be National Water Monitoring Station RS15B020300. I can't find other details, but this background map might be familiar: http://www.epa.ie/hydronet commented 2025-07-10 22:51:27 UTC by VictorIE ♦911 |
| 168735115 (Comments: 4) | Steven-DK (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you have added all the shop information to the address node itself. In Denmark address nodes should not be manually edited or tagged with additional amenities since they are automatically updated on a regular basis. Instead create a sep... commented 2025-07-10 22:40:42 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦82 |
| 38024412 (Comments: 1) | Elwood (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo Elwood, du hast hier mit dem lapidaren Kommentar "Update" die Kleingartenanlage Treue Seele ersatzlos gelöscht. Als Quelle hast du "Geoportal Berlin" genannt, welcher Datensatz genau? Verschiedene Dokumente zeigen... commented 2025-07-10 22:15:33 UTC by Polarbear ♦941 |
 | 51447862 (Comments: 1) | BikeRoad (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thanks for the update. It was noticed! https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/UrbanRoaming/diary/407060 commented 2025-07-10 22:01:12 UTC by UrbanRoaming ♦4 |
| 71825168 (Comments: 6) | wambacher (Discussed changesets: 114) | Hi, dann muß die Stadt schnellstens die Straßenschilder richtig machen. Da steht Landstraße. Gruß, Z. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4671312 commented 2025-07-10 21:52:00 UTC by Znaika ♦112 |
| 168740157 (Comments: 2) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 57) | To była oczyszczalnia dla ośrodka. W uzbrojeniu terenu widać kanalizację. Jak byłem na miejscu to też była tabliczka która o tym mówiła commented 2025-07-10 21:38:46 UTC by Feskil ♦22 |
| 168715374 (Comments: 1) | Ewrt1 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Reverted, adding a fixed version soon https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168762176 commented 2025-07-10 21:38:21 UTC by Ewrt1 ♦46 |
| 168762051 (Comments: 1) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 24) | *Codice di Avviamento Postale 57037 commented 2025-07-10 21:33:02 UTC by wildmaps ♦42 |
| 110004266 (Comments: 2) | VincentVE (Discussed changesets: 23) | Beste Vincent, ik merk op dat de 3 lvl10's die nu bestaan eigenlijk deelgemeenten zijn. Het zouden dus lvl9's moeten zijn. Ze werden toegevoegd na 1961 dus vanaf dan bestond het concept deelgemeente. De deelgemeente Gent zou ... commented 2025-07-10 21:28:01 UTC by kabelhaai ♦22 |
| 168750052 (Comments: 2) | Martaietn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you so much for your reminder! I will add it as agreed. commented 2025-07-10 21:20:08 UTC by Martaietn ♦1 |
| 168724407 (Comments: 2) | EuleKC (Discussed changesets: 3) | One day, San Andreas and New Madrid will go off at the same time, and this *will* be downstream of California. Go to the Santa Monica pier, put on your roller skates, and coast downhill all the way to St. Louis! :) When I map a conservation ar... commented 2025-07-10 21:19:31 UTC by EuleKC ♦2 |
| 168632506 (Comments: 1) | Alina RU (Discussed changesets: 1) | The organized editing guidelines your firm added to the OSM wiki state that you will add the following to your changesets "#propertyview" I see that some of your have it and others do not. Please make sure to follow the practice your compan... commented 2025-07-10 21:17:38 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 141020928 (Comments: 1) | la_1500 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo! Gibt es zu diesen Reihenhäusern eine Quelle? Weil im Moment sieht es vor Ort wie ein einziges Haus im Rohbau aus. commented 2025-07-10 21:13:32 UTC by rohieb ♦108 |
| 168752373 (Comments: 1) | Doritos2020 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12992811159 correctly represents a riding center (www.thejranch.com), this is ok. But all the areas that you have mapped and tagged with leisure=horse_riding or leisure=track + sport=horse_racing ... commented 2025-07-10 20:55:08 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦756 |
| 168613952 (Comments: 2) | Андрей Кирилов (Discussed changesets: 11) | ок commented 2025-07-10 20:49:14 UTC by Андрей Кирилов ♦11 |
| 161472424 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Excuseer, mijn emailadres is niet meer up to date. Daardoor kon ik geen berichten lezen. Ik wijzig hier dus niks meer. commented 2025-07-10 20:42:55 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 167921241 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Ik zal contact opnemen in het Matrixkanaal. commented 2025-07-10 20:40:27 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 143263943 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Mijn emailadres voor OSM is buiten gebruik en daardoor kon ik geen berichten meer lezen. Ik ben dan ook geblokkeerd omdat ik mijn berichten nu moet inhalen en beantwoorden. Ik kan dus nu geen details bekijken. commented 2025-07-10 20:36:07 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 140384976 (Comments: 3) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Dit is 8 maanden geleden bewerkt en aangepast door gebruiker Eebie. commented 2025-07-10 20:32:39 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 168754548 (Comments: 1) | wille (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hola. Las escuelas publicas son operator:type=public no government. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:operator:type?uselang=es commented 2025-07-10 20:32:24 UTC by muralito ♦2,022 |
| 106506670 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Sorry, I don't know. It could be. At the moment I can't check the "luchtfoto". commented 2025-07-10 20:30:26 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 126983447 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hello Woodpeck, I remember that there were a lot of problems with this software MapComplete at that time. These problems have been resolved since this year 2025. commented 2025-07-10 20:27:03 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 118527759 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Ik lees dit bericht nu pas omdat mijn emailadres gewijzigd is. MapComplete heeft deze fouten gemaakt. Tegenwoordig vergelijk ik MapComplete met OSM recente luchtfoto en OSM GRB. commented 2025-07-10 20:24:19 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 168740940 (Comments: 1) | Garffo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lanes should be mapped with tags. Not separate ways. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168740940 commented 2025-07-10 20:20:41 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069 |
| 163122805 (Comments: 2) | ff5722 (Discussed changesets: 90) | Hi, I saw it in a planning map which I can't find anymore, but it's also described here: 2号线南起南廓寺，北至三阳川新区，线路全长21.3km，估算投资37.54亿元，计划于2030年前竣工 http://www.crsc... commented 2025-07-10 20:19:35 UTC by ff5722 ♦215 |
| 168760046 (Comments: 2) | FeuerwehrEppsteinLisa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bitte keine Hydranten mit Straßen verbinden. Hydranten haben keine Adressen. Bei fire_hydrant:position bitte „lane“ statt „street“ hinterlegen. Bei water_source bitte „main“ statt „wasserleitun... commented 2025-07-10 20:18:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168717933 (Comments: 3) | Nüsschen (Discussed changesets: 29) | Freut mich. Ist das denn da dieser Reit und Zuchtstall Witthaut, wie ich das vermutet habe? commented 2025-07-10 20:17:01 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦756 |
| 168755426 (Comments: 1) | FeuerwehrEppsteinLisa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, du hattest hier Punkte eines Gebäude und eines Parks verschoben. Ich habe daher deinen Änderungssatz zurückgesetzt. Bitte erfasse deine Änderungen erneut. Viele Grüße commented 2025-07-10 20:14:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168747404 (Comments: 1) | FeuerwehrEppsteinLisa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, bitte für die Position "lane" statt "street" verwenden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-07-10 20:06:39 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168614449 (Comments: 1) | Андрей Кирилов (Discussed changesets: 11) | Привет! Хотел обратить твое внимание, что post_box:type повсеместно lamp (если ты редактируешь через ID, то надо выбирать тип "Почтовый ящик ... commented 2025-07-10 20:06:03 UTC by bigopenmac ♦55 |
| 168747636 (Comments: 1) | FeuerwehrEppsteinLisa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. - Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Edit... commented 2025-07-10 20:02:09 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168668748 (Comments: 2) | VLD298 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello rskedgell, The "foot=no" tag was added to maintain consistency with the adjacent cycleway sections, which already had this tag. I see that you have made a few tag adjustments already, but if you would also like to remove the f... commented 2025-07-10 19:52:32 UTC by VLD298 ♦3 |
| 168754354 (Comments: 1) | ptr_here (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, This is a small house and there is already an active restaurant here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2403723652 Are there 2 restaurants in this building? I suspect the one you tried to add today replaces the existing one. |
| 168659259 (Comments: 2) | VLD298 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi rskedgell, I have updated the crossing:markings tag as you suggested. Thank you for the feedback. -VLD298 commented 2025-07-10 19:33:32 UTC by VLD298 ♦3 |
| 168688154 (Comments: 3) | m_zahariev (Discussed changesets: 14) | Много зависи. Между Ружинци и Монтана има издадено РС още миналата година, но няма никакви дейности на терен. commented 2025-07-10 19:25:47 UTC by foreigner037 ♦48 |
| 168756598 (Comments: 1) | Michael Kurowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Zu deiner Anpassung an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147081014: Das bringt nicht viel, zumal das maxspeed=5 falsch ist. Daher: Bitte... commented 2025-07-10 19:23:28 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168754375 (Comments: 1) | SCVV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos en name= (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name) Saludos commented 2025-07-10 19:19:32 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 168755125 (Comments: 1) | SCVV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. El tag ref= es como para otra cosa. Lo está usando más como para describir lo que agrega. Para eso se usa description=. En este caso quizás ref= puede ser charlie, ya que es la tercera salida. Pero la palabra &quo... commented 2025-07-10 19:17:34 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 163982781 (Comments: 2) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 593) | Bariera była pewnie odsunięta z powodu wycinki. commented 2025-07-10 19:14:22 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,272 |
| 168751437 (Comments: 1) | Garffo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. You are correct, we only use separate ways if there is physical separation, like a wall or median. You can tag the passing lane with the lanes:forward/lanes:backward key as described on the wiki |
| 168531005 (Comments: 4) | BER319 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Vespucci ist mehr oder weniger der kleine Bruder von JOSM. Den verwende ich, weil ich immer gleich alles vor Ort eintrage. Leider fehlen eben ein paar Kleinigkeiten. Mittlerweile merkt er aber wenn ich etwa Unstimmigkeiten an Relationen ändern m... commented 2025-07-10 18:54:20 UTC by BER319 ♦106 |
| 168718259 (Comments: 3) | seb1842 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Donc depuis la rue des Maluettes, il est interdit de rejoindre la rue de Lazenay, parce que Carrefour commented 2025-07-10 18:51:44 UTC by seb1842 ♦1 |
| 168741041 (Comments: 1) | _krajdawid_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12992261075#map=19/49.884128/20.772615&layers=N drogi nie są połączone co powoduje błąd. Proszę sprawdzać swoje edycje, zwracać uwagę na symbol trójkąta w prawym dolnym rogu oraz reagowa... commented 2025-07-10 18:51:33 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦465 |
| 168644966 (Comments: 4) | Smileworks Aesthetic Training HUB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for removing the mentioned description @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168647338 The removed boundary-tag has been reverted @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168734135 commented 2025-07-10 18:47:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168281109 (Comments: 2) | Buraddo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello, DN, DJ, DC are part of the official name/ref of the road and signify the institution that administrates the road. DN=Drum Național (national road)=administered by the national road company DJ=Drum Județean (county road)=administered... commented 2025-07-10 18:44:49 UTC by Buraddo ♦145 |
| 168755264 (Comments: 1) | adamsc (Discussed changesets: 47) | Dopiero co tam byłem eh xd commented 2025-07-10 18:43:37 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,060 |
| 168751021 (Comments: 1) | 0kapiiier0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja ci dam niewielkie zmiany itp. pseudo opisy zmian. Masz lekturę https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596 --- |
| 154643125 (Comments: 2) | 8as71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 2009 is the date the seedling started to grow at home. 2012 is the date the seedling was planted infront of the Darwineum. commented 2025-07-10 18:38:05 UTC by 8as71 ♦1 |
| 168593132 (Comments: 2) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 152) | Gdzieś takie rozwiązania już spotkałem i nie chciałem utracić danych na linii i obszarze. Chyba to można interpretować tak samo jak `highway=pedestrian+area=yes` i dodatkowo obiekty liniowe `highway=pedestrian` wewnątrz takiego obszar... commented 2025-07-10 18:22:08 UTC by Marek-M ♦905 |
| 146625907 (Comments: 2) | ataevayaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | I changed it to building=yes please let me know if that 20 was intentional commented 2025-07-10 18:11:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168670976 (Comments: 2) | IllusiveBat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Apologies. I would have done this correctly the first time but I just started using OSM on Desktop and not StreetComplete. Thanks for the fix! commented 2025-07-10 18:02:38 UTC by IllusiveBat ♦1 |
| 168668827 (Comments: 3) | alpimd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kein Problem, habe ich zurückverschoben Viele Grüße commented 2025-07-10 17:42:22 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168741058 (Comments: 1) | BlutgruppeNutella (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, ich glaube das hier ist nicht richtig. Die ist nicht nur disused - also unbenutzt - sondern die ist ja wirklich entfernt - also razed. Und das mit dem layer -1 ist auch eher seltsam oder?!? Die ist ja jetzt nicht unter den Geb&... commented 2025-07-10 17:40:03 UTC by flohoff ♦2,364 |
| 168753640 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib5 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168753837 commented 2025-07-10 17:23:14 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168753537 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib5 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168753837 commented 2025-07-10 17:23:14 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168753650 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib5 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168753837 commented 2025-07-10 17:23:14 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168753622 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib5 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168753837 commented 2025-07-10 17:23:14 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168704467 (Comments: 1) | nmac85 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Same issue here. The rough and bunker ways shouldn't intersect each other. The rough needs to go around the bunker. commented 2025-07-10 17:21:10 UTC by b-jazz ♦663 |
| 114738901 (Comments: 1) | Sirji printers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9323642706/history has shop = online_service that was added in this edit is it shop operating online without presence here? (in such case it should be deleted) Is it office of such company? (in such... commented 2025-07-10 16:59:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168704522 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 838) | Changing a tag that has been in use for more than a decade and is used 130k times is very difficult - you need to update all the tools that use the tag, update the memory of all the mappers that remember the old tag, change all the editors... In gene... commented 2025-07-10 16:55:40 UTC by mueschel ♦6,574 |
| 168738554 (Comments: 1) | Ayesha@3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12992199582/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-07-10 16:55:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168702569 (Comments: 1) | Mudadla Pallavi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12989953808/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-07-10 16:55:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168740990 (Comments: 1) | Tejaswi _katta (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168740990 is it tree or bus stop or what? commented 2025-07-10 16:55:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168752194 (Comments: 1) | Bhargavi Mamillapalli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12992780393/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-07-10 16:54:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168725230 (Comments: 2) | JoshuaSh (Discussed changesets: 1) | That was an accident. It looks like someone else has already fixed it. commented 2025-07-10 16:39:30 UTC by JoshuaSh ♦2 |
| 168744761 (Comments: 1) | olehz (Discussed changesets: 205) | Супер! commented 2025-07-10 16:26:51 UTC by Myazyk ♦575 |
| 168745623 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751371 commented 2025-07-10 16:18:23 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745828 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745837 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745850 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745864 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745899 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745912 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745919 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745781 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:55 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745799 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:55 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745820 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:55 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745655 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:55 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745684 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:55 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745703 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:55 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745716 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:55 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745728 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:55 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745556 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745584 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745504 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168745537 (Comments: 1) | fu eerib4 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344 commented 2025-07-10 16:17:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 164496500 (Comments: 1) | Jožo Schwarz (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zdravim, odkial je ten nazov Oeserov rad? Je tam taky napis? Lebo podla VZN to ma byt Oeserova ulica, pozrite https://bratislava.sk/vzn/06-2024 . commented 2025-07-10 16:06:40 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,572 |
| 168724224 (Comments: 1) | ntableman (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: it is best to follow the roof outline when adding a building then square it by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Since this appears to be one building with two residences, just draw the building and add two nodes, one for ea... commented 2025-07-10 15:52:56 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168711739 (Comments: 2) | Foxglove Group Real Estate (Discussed changesets: 2) | Plus you could also add at website tag, website= and phone, phone=+1-123=456-7890 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168711739 commented 2025-07-10 15:48:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 167815160 (Comments: 2) | Ernie C (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ah, I see. I'll delete the other number 37 which is double. Thanks. commented 2025-07-10 15:44:41 UTC by Ernie C ♦12 |
| 167860085 (Comments: 2) | Ernie C (Discussed changesets: 14) | Because of a fire they moved (temporarily). See: https://mvsjanssen.nl/nieuws/tijdelijke-locatie-kantoor/ commented 2025-07-10 15:34:23 UTC by Ernie C ♦12 |
| 168711203 (Comments: 1) | KWasser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi :) danke, dass du hier aufpasst und Adressen aktuell hälst. Eine Bitte: Adressen sollten idR *entweder* nur am Gebäude *oder* als einzelner Punkt im Gebäude erfasst werden. Bei der 3A hast du die Adresse doppelt erfass... commented 2025-07-10 15:31:10 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
 | 168737557 (Comments: 1) | smithingatmosphere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello there :) thank you for your work. It is greatly aprreciated. there are 3 things I would like you to know or take a look at: - this highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413806942 has been drawn above another highway. Gener... commented 2025-07-10 15:28:21 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168682984 (Comments: 1) | fwilmet69 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merci pour la mise à jour commented 2025-07-10 15:26:03 UTC by Gonéo ♦221 |
 | 163620537 (Comments: 2) | Lyon-St-Clair (Discussed changesets: 85) | thanks commented 2025-07-10 15:25:56 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦107 |
| 168682591 (Comments: 1) | fwilmet69 (Discussed changesets: 6) | bien vu, merci pour la correction commented 2025-07-10 15:22:33 UTC by Gonéo ♦221 |
| 168682226 (Comments: 1) | fwilmet69 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merci pour la mise à jour. Le oneway=no est la valeur par défaut. Il n'est pas faux, mais il n'est pas nécessaire de l'ajouter sur la voie de service. commented 2025-07-10 15:21:23 UTC by Gonéo ♦221 |
| 168682139 (Comments: 1) | fwilmet69 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Il serait utile de préciser les accès, probablement foot=yes et éventuellement bicycle=yes commented 2025-07-10 15:18:23 UTC by Gonéo ♦221 |
| 168682066 (Comments: 1) | fwilmet69 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tu as demandé une relecture pour ce changeset : je ne vois rien à redire. Merci pour la correction commented 2025-07-10 15:13:35 UTC by Gonéo ♦221 |
| 168682006 (Comments: 1) | fwilmet69 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Quelques questions et remorques sur ce changement. 1. La partie la plus à l'ouest était auparavant marquée piétonne. Elle devient une zone de rencontre ? 2. Est-ce qu'il y a un double sens cyclable tout le ... commented 2025-07-10 15:11:30 UTC by Gonéo ♦221 |
| 168724315 (Comments: 2) | fmc_7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ich würde bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962936970 erwarten, dass das traffic_sign getagged wird, da es ein Bussonderfahrstreifen ist. commented 2025-07-10 15:02:35 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦11 |
| 168728743 (Comments: 1) | fmc_7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hier hätte erwartet, dass du den Cycleway Track nicht als eigene Geometrie erstellst, sondern den Footway umbaust zu einem getrennten Geh- und Radweg mit VZ 241. Es entspricht einem gemeinsamen Weg im Seitenraum. commented 2025-07-10 14:57:12 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦11 |
| 168240318 (Comments: 1) | ארץ ישראל היפה מאוד 2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thanks for your interest in this park. This building is a picnic shelter, not a house. No one can live here. You can see in Bing Streetside imagery that there are no walls, only a roof over a concrete slab floor and a picnic table inside. In gene... commented 2025-07-10 14:56:42 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦567 |
| 168391193 (Comments: 3) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 290) | dziękuję commented 2025-07-10 14:48:03 UTC by stasiu512 ♦163 |
| 168739249 (Comments: 3) | ivvinci (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nell'editor selezioni il nodo e premi CTRL + backspace, poi salvi la modifica ;) commented 2025-07-10 14:43:20 UTC by MarcoR ♦517 |
| 168687816 (Comments: 3) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 157) | Ja - deshalb meine ich ja - das geht maschinenlesbar mit kerb=lowered - Dann musst du da kein LLM bemühen zu interpretieren was dein note meint ;) commented 2025-07-10 14:28:39 UTC by flohoff ♦2,364 |
| 168661637 (Comments: 3) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 264) | Nie jest bezkolizyjny na południowej jezdni. commented 2025-07-10 14:08:03 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦285 |
| 168664043 (Comments: 1) | SunnyIsland10 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2022-06-29 commented 2025-07-10 14:04:48 UTC by SunnyIsland10 ♦27 |
| 168745113 (Comments: 1) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 55) | ZKM* commented 2025-07-10 13:59:07 UTC by stasiu512 ♦163 |
| 160091603 (Comments: 1) | Dave Stret (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168744750 commented 2025-07-10 13:51:09 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
| 167226724 (Comments: 1) | Dave Stret (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168744750 commented 2025-07-10 13:51:09 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
| 168001470 (Comments: 1) | Dave Stret (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168744750 commented 2025-07-10 13:51:09 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
| 162346594 (Comments: 1) | Dave Stret (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168744750 commented 2025-07-10 13:51:09 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
| 168744453 (Comments: 1) | bbqman (Discussed changesets: 38) | source: bing commented 2025-07-10 13:49:08 UTC by bbqman ♦32 |
| 168744294 (Comments: 1) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 20) | Cześć, po raz kolejny proszę mapowanie ciągów pieszo-rowerowych bez fizycznego rozdzielenia jedną linią. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery commented 2025-07-10 13:48:47 UTC by stasiu512 ♦163 |
| 168743435 (Comments: 1) | NoFlockingWay (Discussed changesets: 2) | are the square brackets around the operator and operator:wikidata tag intentional or is that a mistake that happenend due to copy/paste? david commented 2025-07-10 13:37:05 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
 | 168743024 (Comments: 1) | mbct (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. What did you intend to do here? I am not sure; The square landuse=industrial does not match up to aerial imagery and even if it did its not supposed to be connected to the road. Greetings David commented 2025-07-10 13:32:42 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
| 168723562 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello Eerib, You might want to check these two paths. They seem to be overlapping with other paths now. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413399437 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273242438 Best regards, Taya Snijder commented 2025-07-10 13:32:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168688007 (Comments: 3) | db-ak (Discussed changesets: 32) | rzeczywiście, dla te bloczki głupie xD Inne sprawa, że nie zakazują, znaki DDR dalej stoja i wystarczy obejśc po miejscami juz zadeptanym trawniku commented 2025-07-10 13:25:43 UTC by Yog Sot ♦238 |
| 168661600 (Comments: 11) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 264) | Jeśli mówimy o tym parkingu między jezdniami to dodałem tam restrykcje zakazu skrętu, które są wywołane przez linię krawędziową. Po drugiej stronie jezdni dodałem wjazd na plac więc w sumie może być to kolejna droga wewnęt... commented 2025-07-10 13:25:39 UTC by stasiu512 ♦163 |
| 168742105 (Comments: 1) | YuliyaSurta (Discussed changesets: 51) | Also changed road class. commented 2025-07-10 12:49:24 UTC by YuliyaSurta ♦51 |
| 168323081 (Comments: 6) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 290) | Niby tak. commented 2025-07-10 12:34:56 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦285 |
| 167526489 (Comments: 3) | DonSmon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Die Leitplanke kann als barrier=guard_rail als Punkt an passender Stelle den Pfad behindern. Wie gesagt: Wir erfassen, was da ist. Wenn da ein offensichtlich genutzter Weg ist, kann er erfasst werden. (Es gibt einige, die der Meinung sind, da... commented 2025-07-10 12:26:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168652324 (Comments: 1) | DaisyDuck (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mersi für die Aktualisierung! commented 2025-07-10 12:15:56 UTC by habi ♦1,846 |
| 168670279 (Comments: 3) | Ekaterina0603 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Хорошо, поправил commented 2025-07-10 12:08:20 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦984 |
| 168709748 (Comments: 2) | Balaji0404 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry for the unfortunate mistake and I will make sure this kind of mistakes wont happen further. Thank you for your kind feedback. commented 2025-07-10 12:00:11 UTC by Balaji0404 ♦1 |
| 159270601 (Comments: 1) | cucu (Discussed changesets: 27) | From Neusitz towards the south, I removed the maxspeed again, after visisting. For the part further North, I didn't drive it, but maybe it can also be removed? Further South, there is now a new section with maxspeed 80 (but maybe those tempor... commented 2025-07-10 11:58:31 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,178 |
| 168731478 (Comments: 2) | Mysteriarch (Discussed changesets: 4) | Geen probleem - ik dacht dat ik mogelijk iets gemist had ofzo ha. Meestal vul ik zo geen belangrijke straten in op OSM commented 2025-07-10 11:54:35 UTC by Mysteriarch ♦4 |
| 168048259 (Comments: 1) | Mathilde Stage PVD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci pour vos contributions ! pourriez vous détailler un peu le contenu de vos modifications. Modifs ne dit pas le contenu de ces modifications. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_m... commented 2025-07-10 11:52:46 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,248 |
| 168739210 (Comments: 1) | TPiha (Discussed changesets: 1) | The Veg Point is replaced by Sairme. commented 2025-07-10 11:46:56 UTC by TPiha ♦1 |
| 168721556 (Comments: 1) | nsnassimos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello welcome to osm, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dflowline commented 2025-07-10 11:42:38 UTC by MassCartog ♦126 |
| 168314652 (Comments: 2) | ESándor (Discussed changesets: 11) | Szia Balázs! Beszéljünk erről a következő találkozónkkon. Sándor commented 2025-07-10 11:32:18 UTC by ESándor ♦5 |
| 168690004 (Comments: 2) | myxor (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, danke für dein Feedback. Alternative Vorschläge: seasonal=easter oder event:type=bonfire event:name=Osterfeuer event:opening_hours=… commented 2025-07-10 11:21:49 UTC by myxor ♦5 |
| 168667691 (Comments: 2) | Larmax (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hi, the tag should've been name=Herneniemi. Thanks for pointing that out! commented 2025-07-10 11:20:59 UTC by Larmax ♦271 |
| 168714198 (Comments: 2) | FristyFox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi FristyFox, Alle begin is moeilijk en van je fouten leer je het meest. Den Heuvel heb je gewijzig in highway=path, met als gevolg dat motorvoertuigen niet meer over deze weg kunnen navigeren. Ik zet het weer terug naar residential... commented 2025-07-10 11:00:54 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168613776 (Comments: 2) | Ze0zohk1 (Discussed changesets: 68) | Hallo redd, ja, tracktype wird primär für highway=track verwendet, aber nicht ausschließlich. Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype#How_to_map Bin nicht der einzige der das so mappt :-) Warum ich das so ... commented 2025-07-10 10:52:37 UTC by Ze0zohk1 ♦287 |
| 168714022 (Comments: 1) | Exosss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-10 10:46:38 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168693637 (Comments: 2) | mvanrenselaar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt voor de tips commented 2025-07-10 10:46:09 UTC by mvanrenselaar ♦1 |
| 168674509 (Comments: 1) | GrabMY_nazhifazman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi nazhifazman, there are quite a few iD warnings in this changeset and https://openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/168674380. Maybe you can check them again. If those are roads within the building maybe you can give them "layer=-1&... commented 2025-07-10 10:46:04 UTC by rene78 ♦447 |
| 142347352 (Comments: 2) | Ze0zohk1 (Discussed changesets: 68) | Die Frage geht wohl an den falschen Änderungssatz. Erfasst wurde Spiekplatz hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123068825 Ich gehe dennoch von einem Tippfehler aus und habe den Namen entfernt commented 2025-07-10 10:46:01 UTC by redd ♦390 |
| 168706319 (Comments: 2) | QuoVadis1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Dat is vast niet de naam van het gebouw. Ik heb de naam en overige info toegevoegd aan de address-node. commented 2025-07-10 10:45:58 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 123068825 (Comments: 1) | hanxna (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi hanxna, bei der Erfassung des Namens "Spiekplatz" gehe ich von einem Tippfehler aus und hab es gelöscht. Falls doch anders, bitte nochmal überprüfen. vielen Dank, redd commented 2025-07-10 10:45:18 UTC by redd ♦390 |
| 168698505 (Comments: 1) | MeukDump (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-10 10:37:31 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
 | 168734627 (Comments: 1) | Bodi_varshitha (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you have changed this pedestrian crossing traffic light to be regular traffic light (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals) while i couldn't reliably verify which type of signals those are, i'd like to point out that y... commented 2025-07-10 10:35:01 UTC by fghj753 ♦53 |
| 157569435 (Comments: 4) | Mond00 (Discussed changesets: 76) | Und was ist mit den restlichen, von dir fehlerhaft eingetragenen, Strommasten? Müssen wir die Nodes einzeln aufzählen? commented 2025-07-10 10:34:45 UTC by Edelsalami ♦106 |
| 149331125 (Comments: 1) | Apirnus (Discussed changesets: 26) | Tere, ega sa ei mäleta, kas https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11772485033 on tõesti fooridega ülekäik? Ma pole sealtkaudu ammu liikunud, aga enda teada ma ei mäleta et seal nagu foorid oleks. Küsin sellepärast, k... commented 2025-07-10 10:12:38 UTC by fghj753 ♦53 |
| 168705482 (Comments: 1) | torapa (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi! Can you explain why you reduced precision on the motorway? These segments were aligned precisely using geodesic data. Please do not touch motorways in the Montreal area before asking. Thanks! commented 2025-07-10 10:06:25 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦354 |
| 168730172 (Comments: 2) | kasztelan111 (Discussed changesets: 101) | w porządku poprawię to, to jest akurat trochę kwestia przyzwyczajenia gdyż w niemalże całej reszcie kraju słowa typu "rondo", "plac", "skwer" pisze się z wielkiej litery commented 2025-07-10 10:06:06 UTC by kasztelan111 ♦51 |
| 168733549 (Comments: 1) | Bodi_varshitha (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, are you able to confirm why you added "ciment stone" to addr:unit? I see you already added building:material=stone which is the correct way to tag it commented 2025-07-10 10:05:32 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦32 |
| 168733197 (Comments: 1) | Bodi_varshitha (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you absolutely sure this building's walls are made of metal, because that's what building:material=metal means. You may have wanted to add roof:material=metal, which means roof is made of metal. Also, if... commented 2025-07-10 09:56:57 UTC by fghj753 ♦53 |
| 168716170 (Comments: 1) | benoitdd (Discussed changesets: 28) | Merci, Benoit. commented 2025-07-10 09:53:02 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦97 |
| 168718551 (Comments: 1) | lizardvolk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, but make sure that pedestrian access is connected to the rest of the road network, otherwise routing may be broken. I will fix this. commented 2025-07-10 09:51:45 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦354 |
| 168733895 (Comments: 1) | Peter Angelos Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-10 09:48:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168508161 (Comments: 7) | dhx1 (Discussed changesets: 21) | The fields I mentioned previously "data about antenna polarisation, elevation, frequency, height, manufacturer, power rating, reference codes, start dates, tower type/construction and names" but really anything copied from other datasets is... commented 2025-07-10 09:47:17 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 151017618 (Comments: 3) | infeeeee (Discussed changesets: 18) | Bárcsak összevonva lett volna, de nem, csak simán törölve lett mert valaki azt hitte duplikátum, ezzel elveszett minden adat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168128847 Szóval ez a külön jel... commented 2025-07-10 09:37:21 UTC by infeeeee ♦526 |
| 163837122 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 393) | Bonjour, Merci pour l'alerte, nous avons supprimé les Siret Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-07-10 09:37:09 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦234 |
| 168464727 (Comments: 5) | steglitz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich verstehe jetzt, was du meinst. Das sollte jetzt repariert sein. commented 2025-07-10 09:31:58 UTC by steglitz ♦1 |
| 168732756 (Comments: 1) | greenangelcleaning (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-10 09:28:20 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168650839 (Comments: 2) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thank you for noticing the error. Fixed. commented 2025-07-10 09:21:16 UTC by addr: ♦19 |
| 168575947 (Comments: 1) | Mintego (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi Mintengo, hier existiert sehr wohl ein Coop. Er hat vor einigen Wochen geöffnet. Bitte überprüfe deine Edits gründlich, insbesondere bei Löschungen. Ich habe diese Änderung revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-07-10 09:01:53 UTC by perenniallylate ♦17 |
| 168518035 (Comments: 2) | Electos (Discussed changesets: 5) | hi, are circles like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412475186 - roundabouts? commented 2025-07-10 09:01:25 UTC by Sanniu ♦571 |
| 110763686 (Comments: 1) | seawolff (Discussed changesets: 12) | Weißt du ob der Hinweis von anonym korrekt ist, da du die Wege hinzugefügt hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4611742 commented 2025-07-10 08:58:32 UTC by cuzi ♦118 |
| 68598715 (Comments: 3) | Victorrrr (Discussed changesets: 2) | По этой ссылке в комментариях к публикации немного юмора https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenerifehikingclub/posts/297370260895178 commented 2025-07-10 08:51:12 UTC by Victorrrr ♦2 |
| 150759626 (Comments: 1) | Le_Sharkoïste (Discussed changesets: 31) | All of these have been reverted meanwhile. I agree in the sence that these are not railway=station. One of them was retagged as railway=yard; maybe it is worth adding the ones that were deleted as that kind of object. commented 2025-07-10 08:49:57 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,178 |
| 68537866 (Comments: 1) | Victorrrr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Оригинальное название пещеры неизвестно. Это название родилось как шутка во время посещения пещеры в 2018 году. Светлана Дрожжинова нахо... commented 2025-07-10 08:45:36 UTC by Victorrrr ♦2 |
| 167962633 (Comments: 1) | KHALIDA AMANI BT MUHAMMAD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, just to let you know that the potential flood risk area is not suitable to add into OpenStreetMap. And the tagging will confuse people into mistaking it as an actual waterbody. Please remove it. Thanks. commented 2025-07-10 08:45:33 UTC by Zh9567 ♦17 |
| 162757064 (Comments: 3) | eastender (Discussed changesets: 32) | Fair enough, I have revisited the site several times. A new plate has now been inserted and I've updated the node on OSM. commented 2025-07-10 08:40:41 UTC by john paul jones & gringo ♦19 |
| 168608008 (Comments: 2) | cassette8778 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ce ar trebui să fac pentru a-mi repara greșelile? commented 2025-07-10 08:39:17 UTC by cassette8778 ♦1 |
| 168730340 (Comments: 1) | winterrr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi winterrr, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. ... commented 2025-07-10 08:36:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168051913 (Comments: 3) | Rupert Swarbrick (Discussed changesets: 3) | The box outside Culbowie Lodge seems like a private post-box, belonging to the Lodge. It may have an old Collection Plate inserted or even a made-up one. I don't know, but you've seen it so you know best. https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/... commented 2025-07-10 08:35:24 UTC by john paul jones & gringo ♦19 |
| 168728058 (Comments: 2) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 20) | Poprawny link do CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168730256 commented 2025-07-10 08:27:28 UTC by Marek-M ♦905 |
| 168355509 (Comments: 6) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 107) | There is some guidance in the OSM wiki on how to map constructions work: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction > Zusätzlich kann construction=minor für Baustellen (z.B. Fahrbahnverbreiterung oder -erneuerung) auf... commented 2025-07-10 08:19:14 UTC by philipgriggs ♦2 |
| 166670482 (Comments: 1) | anonimowy0000 (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12858705793 na pewno można w tym miejscu naładować rower lub auto elektryczne? commented 2025-07-10 08:13:52 UTC by Aim311_ ♦115 |
| 120942167 (Comments: 1) | Pfälzer669 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hallo Pfälzer669, bei Sitzbänken ist als Material bei OSM das der Sitzfläche ausschlaggebend, nicht das der kompletten Kostruktion. Liebe Grüße, Jens commented 2025-07-10 08:08:03 UTC by townlion ♦256 |
| 168640667 (Comments: 3) | Denis_Helfer (Discussed changesets: 64) | Tant que les outils ne géreront pas ça mieux, c'est inévitable. De temps en temps je tombe sur de la casse que j'ai faite moi-même :-) commented 2025-07-10 08:06:19 UTC by StC ♦254 |
| 164054294 (Comments: 3) | anonimowy0000 (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3374209 skąd info, że to jest park? Po wjechaniu w drogę do zabudowań jakichś domków letniskowych z tabliczkami teren monitorowany, całkiem sprawnie, na sygnale przyjeżdża security! commented 2025-07-10 08:03:31 UTC by Aim311_ ♦115 |
| 168505158 (Comments: 1) | hatochan (Discussed changesets: 15) | 駐車場と思われる地物で、タグが不可解な箇所がいくつかあります https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412361623 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412361626 また、東松山市を含むこの一帯は、Bingが3... commented 2025-07-10 07:58:32 UTC by 大山かなめ ♦55 |
| 164523591 (Comments: 4) | anonimowy0000 (Discussed changesets: 24) | W Trzciance pododawałeś wiele dróg, które są w planach jako w budowie, a np. aktualnej budowy ul. Jana Sobieskiego, gdzie jest budowane "mega rondo" już pominąłeś, a w bezpośredniej okolicy budowy dodałeś drogi i atr... commented 2025-07-10 07:50:00 UTC by Aim311_ ♦115 |
| 167645424 (Comments: 2) | VáclavS (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ďakujem za návod – musím na tom ešte popracovať 😊 commented 2025-07-10 07:45:43 UTC by VáclavS ♦11 |
| 168382183 (Comments: 1) | r3to (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao r3to Ich bin hier weil du `review_requested=yes` gemacht hast. Abgesehen davon, dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411382232/history/1 L-förmig etwas zu lang geraten ist, sieht das doch tiptop aus und sollte das Fussgäng... commented 2025-07-10 07:31:39 UTC by habi ♦1,846 |
| 166582929 (Comments: 1) | anonimowy0000 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Cześć. Było dobrze. Zmiana neighbourhood na suburb została wycofana. commented 2025-07-10 07:26:31 UTC by Aim311_ ♦115 |
| 168678456 (Comments: 3) | Dirk_Hom (Discussed changesets: 10) | Moin Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Ohne Beschilderung ist es immer schwierig für andere den Namen zu verifizieren. Wenn du aber sagst, dass der Weg unter diesem Namen bekannt isr, dann könnte das dafür spreche... commented 2025-07-10 07:22:08 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168726749 (Comments: 1) | Pavel0451 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Альтернативный вариант — просто ставить точку со вторым адресом внутрь полигона здания. Вроде бы это лучше воспринимается навигатор... commented 2025-07-10 07:20:06 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦119 |
| 167801776 (Comments: 2) | anonimowy0000 (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12924837186 W tym miejscu ile razy w miesiącu odbywają się imprezy? Scena jest wykonana z betonu, czy to przyczepa? commented 2025-07-10 07:14:18 UTC by Aim311_ ♦115 |
| 167582997 (Comments: 1) | anonimowy0000 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Cześć kiedy zacznie się budowa tego osiedla? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395025284 commented 2025-07-10 07:09:49 UTC by Aim311_ ♦115 |
| 157399191 (Comments: 4) | basxto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke, dann ist das klar. Es gibt Scherzkekse, die die Namen tatsächlicher Bewohner an Gebäude taggen und als Quelle das Klingelschild nutzen – das hätte mit „Schildchen am Haus“ ja gemeint sein können :) commented 2025-07-10 07:08:13 UTC by FraukeLeo ♦283 |
| 168727118 (Comments: 1) | Local Roots AC and Plumbing LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-10 07:00:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 167480482 (Comments: 2) | janhals (Discussed changesets: 22) | Dag Baggeraar, bedankt voor het signaleren van deze fout. Ik heb het veranderd. Groet Jan. commented 2025-07-10 06:50:41 UTC by janhals ♦11 |
| 140994523 (Comments: 1) | Stefano Giampietro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. I tag di accesso sono pensati per le way. Sulle relazioni puoi usare il tag state=close Ivo commented 2025-07-10 06:30:52 UTC by Jrachi ♦769 |
| 100211115 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 220) | vermoed foute klik aangepast commented 2025-07-10 06:26:00 UTC by Jakka ♦1,815 |
| 168583644 (Comments: 3) | BHSPitMonkey (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 commented 2025-07-10 06:24:55 UTC by zby-cz ♦8 |
| 168711853 (Comments: 2) | fmc_7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413560053 Dieser Weg wird in TILDA nicht als Getrennter Geh- Radweg erkannt werden. Dafür muss ergänzt werden: - traffic_mode:right=foo - is_sidepath=yes Bitte auch ergänzen: ... commented 2025-07-10 06:07:31 UTC by tordans ♦410 |
| 168667722 (Comments: 2) | makebelieve (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank voor het bericht! Hartelijke groeten, Jense commented 2025-07-10 06:03:41 UTC by makebelieve ♦1 |
| 95825115 (Comments: 1) | DiaouligRu (Discussed changesets: 19) | La traduction "br" Rue de l'Aubépine vous attend :) commented 2025-07-10 05:54:12 UTC by LudovicG ♦68 |
| 168712896 (Comments: 1) | luisaew (Discussed changesets: 2) | Weißt du noch, wie viele Stellplätze es sich um Behindertenparkplätze sich handeln? Ich habe die Aufteilung größtenteils rückgängig gemacht, da die Einzeichnung der Parkbuchten einfacher und praktischer ist als es... commented 2025-07-10 05:34:38 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦197 |
| 49238369 (Comments: 1) | HERI HUTABARAT (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4894990022 - is name:en=Aaaaaaaa real? Probably no commented 2025-07-10 05:28:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
 | 134122003 (Comments: 13) | RLakhani (Discussed changesets: 17) | Corrected road priorities are essential for ensuring smoother traffic flow, reducing accidents, and improving road safety. When road priorities are clearly marked and followed, it minimizes confusion among drivers and enhances overall transportation ... commented 2025-07-10 05:28:25 UTC by nosagi ♦1 |
| 168488929 (Comments: 2) | Andi00787 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nochmals zur Funktionsweise von OSM: Du kannst als Eigentümer einschränkende Beschilderung aufstellen, die dann anschließend in OSM erfasst wird. Revertiert in Changeset: 168723390. commented 2025-07-10 05:13:51 UTC by martinst ♦319 |
| 168720033 (Comments: 1) | Angad Chhikara (Discussed changesets: 1) | #NameCheck Hello and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified. Some of these names caught my attention a... commented 2025-07-10 05:09:27 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168719115 (Comments: 1) | Sanrend75 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #NameCheck Hello and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified. Some of these names caught my attention a... commented 2025-07-10 05:07:37 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168720152 (Comments: 3) | SHSsouthwestbroward (Discussed changesets: 1) | as mentioned above, this commit adds an unsupported feature type to OSM mapped with existing tagging that has different meanings so it has too be reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168722732 commented 2025-07-10 04:51:18 UTC by Udarian ♦411 |
| 168680215 (Comments: 1) | Sravya_Tummuru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fiction removed and highway placement reinstated. commented 2025-07-10 04:36:18 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,856 |
| 168721918 (Comments: 1) | AranzaGH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buenas noches, estaba probando como funciona esta página y al parecer no puedo borrar los cambios una vez subidos jajs, agradecería si alguien logra eliminar mis dos cambios por favor. commented 2025-07-10 04:35:00 UTC by AranzaGH ♦1 |
| 167556351 (Comments: 1) | tuan_gsm (Discussed changesets: 19) | cái nào cấm có thời hạn nhớ lưu vào một changeset trong google sheet để hết thời hạn revert lại normal nhé. commented 2025-07-10 04:28:24 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦232 |
| 168545157 (Comments: 1) | SD 永田 (Discussed changesets: 5) | この道路は2車線道路ではありません。以前も申し上げましたが、現状にそぐわない身勝手な編集はお止めください。 commented 2025-07-10 04:21:21 UTC by postown ♦6 |
| 168631470 (Comments: 8) | iamiandyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Absolute legend mate, I appreciate your assistance in this! commented 2025-07-10 04:12:42 UTC by iamiandyi ♦1 |
| 168720480 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 51) | I'm not really sure. I just went with what was being distributed via social media and the traditional news media. I could be very wrong with the pronunciation. https://thetyee.ca/News/2025/06/24/Can-You-Tell-Me-How-Get-Street/ http... commented 2025-07-10 03:58:06 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168689983 (Comments: 1) | GOJIDAN (Discussed changesets: 6) | This edit downplays Indian administration in Arunachal Pradesh and misrepresents the disputed status of the region. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168689983 commented 2025-07-10 02:53:09 UTC by hotsizler305 ♦1 |
| 168713500 (Comments: 1) | IoanaD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alo, ce faci? Distrugi harta marcand terenurile drept cladiri commented 2025-07-10 02:50:09 UTC by Sorain ♦6 |
| 167840006 (Comments: 3) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 51) | Added name:hur:pronunciation=sh-MUS-quee-um-AW-sum in CS#168720480 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168720480 Local news confirm this pronunciation. https://globalnews.ca/news/11252350/trutch-street-renamed-sx%CA%B7... commented 2025-07-10 02:39:27 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 161080735 (Comments: 1) | eKickbike (Discussed changesets: 6) | What is the source for the elevation of this peak? commented 2025-07-10 02:38:51 UTC by CRCulver ♦191 |
| 168656542 (Comments: 1) | jcbherrman (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi jcbherrman, Thank you for your contributions. I'm wondering why you decided to add a node for "downtown washington". As far as I know, there is no official neighborhood with this name, and thus there cannot be a defined center po... commented 2025-07-10 01:59:45 UTC by andrewth1 ♦5 |
| 168719932 (Comments: 1) | evilworld (Discussed changesets: 6) | I think I made a mistake with Peter Pan’s Flight. There were two buildings on top of each other, and I have deleted the one classified as a building with no name. Now I don't know if that was okay or not. commented 2025-07-10 01:55:10 UTC by evilworld ♦4 |
| 168512959 (Comments: 4) | Jota Cartas (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ok, vou eliminar a relação Sintra (vila) 19323791 , e ficam só as relações importadas do INE: Vila de Sintra(038622) e Sintra (subúrbio) (022713) commented 2025-07-10 01:48:25 UTC by Jota Cartas ♦3 |
| 167851334 (Comments: 2) | libremn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! commented 2025-07-10 01:34:39 UTC by libremn ♦1 |
| 142787728 (Comments: 1) | khaieeee (Discussed changesets: 7) | You "lit" edits are being reverted because they are literally nonsense and strongly opinionated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reply. commented 2025-07-10 01:30:30 UTC by DUGA ♦549 |
| 168648421 (Comments: 1) | ptinours (Discussed changesets: 1) | Y a-t-il vraiment un "arrêt de bus" sur les rails ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12987650201 Par ailleurs, le "nom" ne devrait pas décrire l'objet. commented 2025-07-10 01:29:51 UTC by Pan ♦51 |
| 164960633 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 76) | The Golden Gate Bridge is not comparable to the Coronado Bridge; the Golden Gate Bridge is part of a large freeway section of US 101, whereas the Coronado Bridge is a short spur off of Interstate 5 that consists entirely of itself. commented 2025-07-10 00:33:23 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦52 |
| 168693070 (Comments: 2) | arnalielsewhere (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks Frans! commented 2025-07-10 00:14:58 UTC by arnalielsewhere ♦3 |
| 168715682 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 117) | Dzięki! Przy okazji jest taki plugin jak undelete, może się przydawać w takich sytuacjach do przywracania konkretnego obiektu :P https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/Undelete commented 2025-07-10 00:07:48 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,060 |
| 168718438 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 88) | for the spots were I was uncertain I left them without any construction tagging and will go back in the near future to determine which parts are under construction; so essentially work still needed. commented 2025-07-09 23:55:43 UTC by Udarian ♦411 |
| 168697445 (Comments: 1) | baatuhannkayaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Küçükçekmece Belediyesi'nden amenity=townhall etiketini neden kaldırdınız? Ayrıca ortasına hastane koymuşsunuz. Orası artık hastane mi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905357569 https://www.openstr... commented 2025-07-09 23:48:30 UTC by keyyushi ♦6 |
| 168711241 (Comments: 1) | Seafront Apartment Ardeşen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, 377496329 ID'li yolun adı "Seafront Apartment Ardeşen" mi yoksa tatil yerini haritalandırırken yanlışlıkla onu da mı isimlendirdiniz? Ayrıca tatil yerini yanlışlıkla Ardeşen (1725592) ve Konaktepe (1721775... commented 2025-07-09 23:45:21 UTC by keyyushi ♦6 |
| 168606036 (Comments: 2) | ivanma (Discussed changesets: 5) | That's because I selected "covered but not inside option" in StreetComplete. ATMs are located under the roof/arch attached to the building, so they can't be considered fully inside or outside. commented 2025-07-09 23:42:45 UTC by ivanma ♦6 |
| 168708938 (Comments: 1) | KAYA006 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Selamlar, Bazı elementleri silip tekrar haritalandırmışsınız. Bunu neden yaptınız? commented 2025-07-09 23:26:18 UTC by keyyushi ♦6 |
| 167356582 (Comments: 10) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 6) | That one is at the service center of the dealership. The Department of Energy, EV Connect, PlugShare, Apple, Google, and us all have it over the building. I suspect that its inside the service center. commented 2025-07-09 23:10:24 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦23 |
| 162494783 (Comments: 1) | ilTeo1982 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check https://osm.org/changeset/168717656 commented 2025-07-09 22:58:40 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦344 |
| 168477268 (Comments: 1) | Daniele Bracchi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Daniele, Ho visto che hai marcato questo sentiero con bicycle=no con la dicitura "impraticabile", ma questo attributo si usa solo quando c'è un divieto, e non per indicare la difficoltà. Di fatto, il sentiero ... commented 2025-07-09 22:36:21 UTC by amadvance ♦72 |
| 102190892 (Comments: 1) | mathavan2307 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check https://osm.org/note/4846889 commented 2025-07-09 22:35:13 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦344 |
| 168665561 (Comments: 1) | quinten501 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-09 22:33:06 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168716864 (Comments: 1) | Alexmol (Discussed changesets: 22) | Por engano o título e source estão errados. São actualizações de antenas, source: Comunidade Cellmapper PT commented 2025-07-09 22:21:56 UTC by Alexmol ♦92 |
| 168655640 (Comments: 1) | Hans Wildenberg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-09 22:20:27 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 86603814 (Comments: 1) | e_barreira (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check https://osm.org/note/4846881 commented 2025-07-09 22:20:06 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦344 |
| 168716359 (Comments: 1) | McCio (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ciao McCio,in questo caso è migliore usare disused:shop=electronics, oppure https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant commented 2025-07-09 22:17:48 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦284 |
| 168640283 (Comments: 4) | craakash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Als je verder wilt gaan, kun je dan het laatste deel van het fietspad naar de Schipholweg ook intekenen ? commented 2025-07-09 22:13:14 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 110142471 (Comments: 1) | Karun Mook (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check https://osm.org/note/4846879 commented 2025-07-09 22:11:54 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦344 |
| 168407589 (Comments: 2) | Dave Laird (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry about that! Noted. I was using the Toronto Latest Orthoimagery and the Strava heatmap, but both myst be out of date.Nothing beats an IRL survey! Cheers. commented 2025-07-09 22:09:41 UTC by Dave Laird ♦1 |
| 57610990 (Comments: 1) | b_adams (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check https://osm.org/note/4846876 commented 2025-07-09 22:07:59 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦344 |
| 168671720 (Comments: 2) | FoeNyx (Discussed changesets: 9) | Please check https://osm.org/note/4846874 commented 2025-07-09 21:59:44 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦344 |
| 168541526 (Comments: 1) | mainsprinter (Discussed changesets: 4) | FYI, ich habe den hier (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168541526) um 90m verschoben Knoten (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9195752312) soeben wieder zurückgeschoben, siehe: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16871... commented 2025-07-09 21:42:07 UTC by unni-geo ♦30 |
| 168715598 (Comments: 1) | mapper83490 (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully as it has been identified as vandalism. Please refer to: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can have t... commented 2025-07-09 21:41:29 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168715557 (Comments: 1) | mapper83490 (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully as it has been identified as vandalism. Please refer to: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can have t... commented 2025-07-09 21:41:23 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168715540 (Comments: 1) | mapper83490 (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully as it has been identified as vandalism. Please refer to: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can have t... commented 2025-07-09 21:41:15 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168715434 (Comments: 1) | mapper83490 (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully as it has been identified as vandalism. Please refer to: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can have t... commented 2025-07-09 21:41:08 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168673529 (Comments: 2) | spookypgh (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for checking and correcting. I was doing this on my phone and it was acting wonky. I should only do this on an actual computer. Thanks again! commented 2025-07-09 21:40:05 UTC by spookypgh ♦2 |
| 168715728 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Lanik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Daniel Lanik, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment fie... commented 2025-07-09 21:36:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168699592 (Comments: 2) | lxosm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sinto muito, obrigado pela correção! commented 2025-07-09 21:36:31 UTC by lxosm ♦1 |
| 168558838 (Comments: 2) | map-dynartio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравей ! Да, действително, има няколко тройни стълба на линията 220 кВ. До колкото знам, за по-лесна картография, този тип стълбове могат да... commented 2025-07-09 21:30:22 UTC by map-dynartio ♦2 |
| 168698349 (Comments: 4) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 117) | A dobra, już wiem, która to ścieżka xd Powinienem był zostawić i oznaczyć podobnie jak tamta przy słupkach - zaraz nadrobię commented 2025-07-09 21:25:49 UTC by Anas masuris ♦118 |
| 168602689 (Comments: 1) | pascaltippelt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check https://osm.org/note/4846839 commented 2025-07-09 21:24:51 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦344 |
| 168663797 (Comments: 1) | Nouveaut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, You have accidentally removed building=yes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159875482. Every building should have a building=* tag, otherwise it will not be rendered as a building on the maps. I have restored it in https://www.openstreet... commented 2025-07-09 21:10:36 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦756 |
| 168156467 (Comments: 1) | TWHB (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hoi, De tekst 'Wisselbaan A9' is een omschrijving i.p.v. een straatnaam. Deze hoort daarom thuis in de tag description i.p.v. name. Op de Gaasperdammerweg was de correcte straatnaam Gaasperdammerweg zelfs overschreven door Wisselbaan A9.... commented 2025-07-09 21:10:13 UTC by A67-A67 ♦932 |
| 160646647 (Comments: 3) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 290) | No cóż. Historia wersji wyraźnie sugeruje że wspomniana linia powstała właśnie tej edycji, poprzez podzielenie tej linii: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292304506 i że ten podział był właśnie w celu dodania tagów tunnel=ye... commented 2025-07-09 20:53:21 UTC by dzamper ♦112 |
| 167781895 (Comments: 3) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 22) | I really don't mind having the historic river course in OSM but this has to be additional to the flowlines through the reservoir. I had to go through and re-add a lot of the deleted data. I would kindly ask that you familiarize yourself with the... commented 2025-07-09 20:47:52 UTC by quincylvania ♦54 |
| 168155059 (Comments: 2) | TWHB (Discussed changesets: 57) | Excuses, De inlogpagina verwees me door naar de verkeerde opmerking. commented 2025-07-09 20:46:04 UTC by A67-A67 ♦932 |
| 168652955 (Comments: 1) | Drevviken65 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Går det att lägga till namnet på mataffären du lade till? Svårt att bedöma annars om det är en faktisk unik butik eller bara en dubblett av ICA annars. commented 2025-07-09 20:29:22 UTC by simer_lkpg ♦9 |
| 168463254 (Comments: 1) | Railwayfan2005 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Thanks, that looks fine to me. commented 2025-07-09 20:28:26 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦375 |
| 168607496 (Comments: 2) | Drevviken65 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Även lite konstigt att du tar bort Skogåshallens byggnad för att därefter lägga till Skogåshallen som en punkt. commented 2025-07-09 20:26:06 UTC by simer_lkpg ♦9 |
| 168712667 (Comments: 1) | Gucio10 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ścieżka błędnie połączona z granicą administracyjną. Tu nie ma oficjalnie żadnego mostku/kładki – to zwykły jaz, w dodatku nigdzie nie prowadzi. Błędne/również nadmiarowe tagowanie. Zmianę niestety wycofałem... commented 2025-07-09 20:23:22 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,060 |
| 123383828 (Comments: 2) | random tree (Discussed changesets: 8) | You are right. S.th. went wrong there. I will remove the height until I can borrow a measuring device again in the future to gauge the height correctly. commented 2025-07-09 19:55:17 UTC by random tree ♦4 |
| 168696126 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 290) | No właśnie wydaje mi się, że 7 miesięcy temu dyskusji nie było. commented 2025-07-09 19:48:05 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦285 |
| 168689255 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 290) | Aktualnie obowiązująca definicja tego nie rozróżnia. commented 2025-07-09 19:47:12 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦285 |
| 168683949 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 117) | Ja bym nie dawał tutaj żadnego ref, bo PKS też raczej nim nie jest. commented 2025-07-09 19:43:57 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,060 |
| 168414244 (Comments: 2) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks, I don't know much about horse mapping. commented 2025-07-09 19:35:49 UTC by quincylvania ♦54 |
| 168711808 (Comments: 1) | rancidgoat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Deleted West end of High Street. I mistakenly wrote east in my original edit. commented 2025-07-09 19:35:22 UTC by rancidgoat ♦1 |
| 168669532 (Comments: 2) | JochenB (Discussed changesets: 60) | Oh, yes it ist correct. Thank you! commented 2025-07-09 19:32:49 UTC by JochenB ♦94 |
| 99804895 (Comments: 3) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 107) | Ok, tak ked to Cesi takto pouzivaju. Len teda je nevyjasnena ta otazka, ci su horarne stale funkcne. commented 2025-07-09 19:29:35 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,572 |
| 168677183 (Comments: 2) | Ezra Jenks (Discussed changesets: 9) | Cool thx. commented 2025-07-09 19:29:06 UTC by Ezra Jenks ♦6 |
| 168711557 (Comments: 1) | Foxglove Group Real Estate (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-09 19:27:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
 | 168708301 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 443) | This failed with "cannot upload changeset: 520 <none> at /home/ajtown/src/osm-revert-scripts/lib/Progress.pm line 104.", which isn't great. The changeset comment was supposed to be "Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry... commented 2025-07-09 19:27:13 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168692971 (Comments: 1) | Tiskel-Patryk (Discussed changesets: 4) | Jaka nawigacja? Dane się mogą odświeżać od kilku godzin do kilku dni (w nawigacjach online). Ogólnie te dodane tagi są zbędne więc zmianę wycofałem. `access=no` z założenia blokuje wszystkim, o ile inny tag nie nadpi... commented 2025-07-09 19:26:30 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,060 |
| 168157426 (Comments: 1) | TWHB (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hoi, In Nederland taggen we POI's zoals datacentra op de adresnodes, niet op de gebouwen. Ik heb de POI's verplaatst. commented 2025-07-09 19:25:20 UTC by A67-A67 ♦932 |
| 167829367 (Comments: 6) | DKTR99921222 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dakujeme za info. Ano ten Importer by sa mal opravit, ale nie je v nasich moznostiach. Tiez revertovat to nechceme vsetko (okrem toho je tych sad zmien prilis vela), nove Z-Boxy by sme mohli ponechat, len tam opravit tie udaje a pridat nieco ako &... commented 2025-07-09 19:20:17 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,572 |
| 162322630 (Comments: 3) | Malinovsky (Discussed changesets: 9) | Skwer Manifestu Lipcowego? Szanowny Panie propaguje Pan komunizm? Co na to Instytut Pamięci Narodowej? To miejsce nie ma nazwy, proszę o likwidację tego żartu. commented 2025-07-09 19:17:13 UTC by mark2525 ♦16 |
| 167837475 (Comments: 1) | DKTR99921222 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Kedy planuje obnovit tie vymazane Z-Boxy ? commented 2025-07-09 19:15:25 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,572 |
| 162562965 (Comments: 1) | duilio branda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cosa vorrebbe dire dan? commented 2025-07-09 19:13:56 UTC by nick1993 ♦20 |
| 167350842 (Comments: 1) | Fallenz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fallenz, Estradas com nomes descritivos como "Estrada Para Boa Esperança" devem ser evitados. Na tag name=* deve ir apenas nomes próprios. Leia mais a respeito em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3... commented 2025-07-09 19:12:35 UTC by santamariense ♦821 |
| 168692999 (Comments: 1) | kdpy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Droga nie spełnia wymagań do kategorii trunk. Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168711062 commented 2025-07-09 19:11:44 UTC by bartgron ♦182 |
| 168687346 (Comments: 1) | Dominik03032022 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkung zu deiner Ergänzung: Das Feld „couplings“ bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen&ldquo... commented 2025-07-09 19:09:38 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168667123 (Comments: 1) | Stiefend (Discussed changesets: 3) | Der Pumptrack war bereits vorhanden commented 2025-07-09 19:09:08 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,862 |
| 168669975 (Comments: 1) | alpimd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, auch hier: keine Anmerkung. Viele Grüße commented 2025-07-09 19:05:26 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 166588814 (Comments: 1) | VMurin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Kampinmäki/Kampinpolku, ei löydy virallista tietoa nimistä. Ovatko paikallisia nimiä reiteille? Silloin tagi loc_name=* commented 2025-07-09 19:01:01 UTC by Muokkaaja ♦16 |
| 168668381 (Comments: 1) | alpimd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das sieht gut aus – keine Anmerkungen! Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen. Viele ... commented 2025-07-09 19:00:21 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168703353 (Comments: 1) | Cтac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Удалил тег name, так как у этого дома нет имени собственного, только адрес. addr:city внутри города сейчас заполнять нет необходимости, горо... commented 2025-07-09 19:00:10 UTC by fndoder ♦94 |
| 168682829 (Comments: 1) | Breit S (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Aus dem First auf dem Luftbild schließe ich, dass es sich um ein eigenes Gebäude handelt. Das wäre dann: building=service utility=power power=subs... commented 2025-07-09 18:56:49 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168709586 (Comments: 1) | 007vk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert. Hallo 007vk, willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe Deine Änderung rückgängig gemaxht, weil Du einen wichtigen Schlüssel von der Mannheimer Stadtgrenze gelöscht hattest. Was wolltest Du hinzufügen? Viele Gr&u... commented 2025-07-09 18:55:45 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,288 |
| 157593919 (Comments: 2) | Mond00 (Discussed changesets: 76) | korrigiert commented 2025-07-09 18:55:20 UTC by Mond00 ♦76 |
| 167332690 (Comments: 1) | Fallenz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fallenz, Bem-vindo ao OSM. Vi que tu elevou diversas estradas nesta região para primary. Segundo regra estabelecida pela comunidade, para ser primary tem que ser pavimentada e ser rota principal de uma cidade de 20 mil ha... commented 2025-07-09 18:44:02 UTC by santamariense ♦821 |
| 168703682 (Comments: 2) | pms63 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich hatte einen guten Lehrer! commented 2025-07-09 18:29:29 UTC by pms63 ♦1 |
| 162935219 (Comments: 1) | Carlos Monteiro 30 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá Carlos Monteiro 30, Bem-vindo ao OSM. Vi que tu deletou algumas linhas como esta [1] provavelmente por ter achado que não fazia sentido. Porém, elas fazem. São linhas "imaginárias" que de... commented 2025-07-09 18:28:41 UTC by santamariense ♦821 |
| 124097210 (Comments: 2) | deduce technologies (Discussed changesets: 3) | @deduce technologies : what was the source of this data? commented 2025-07-09 18:26:08 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168676936 (Comments: 1) | sanjanasharma_lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Turn lanes are tagged based off the segment terminating at the node where the turns apply. Further, "none" only works as a turn lane value if "no" is the access value for the same lane. --- #REVIEWED... commented 2025-07-09 18:25:51 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,117 |
| 139048025 (Comments: 1) | frog24-48 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo frog24-48, die Straßennummer (K 751) gehört nur ins "ref", nicht ins "name". Da kommt nur der Straßenname rein, und wenn sie keinen hat, wird das Tag nicht gesetzt. Ich ändere das mal. commented 2025-07-09 18:19:10 UTC by FraukeLeo ♦283 |
| 168653772 (Comments: 1) | user_7031 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi user_7031, danke für die Änderung. Deiner Statisitk zufolge bist du ja ein erfahrener Mapper. Da du aber review_requested=yes angegeben hast, hier mein Feedback: Es ist recht unwahrscheinlich, dass jemand den Operator aufgrund de... commented 2025-07-09 18:13:42 UTC by MrMoehritz ♦197 |
| 168658045 (Comments: 1) | Aldeia da Pontemieiro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1413295629. What is the mean of the tag parque_literario = Parque Literário? Are you aware that we use keys (and values) in British English? commented 2025-07-09 18:08:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
 | 168708350 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 357) | wrong comment: correct contact information commented 2025-07-09 18:01:32 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 158278471 (Comments: 1) | Brent_Allen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding these details!! commented 2025-07-09 18:00:06 UTC by watmildon ♦246 |
| 168675804 (Comments: 2) | Ebruinsma (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je hebt gelijk. ik pas het aan. Bedankt voor het meekijken. commented 2025-07-09 17:57:12 UTC by Ebruinsma ♦4 |
| 168708082 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 443) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 168631271, 168631326, 168631334, 168631918, 168648673, 168675005, 168676597, 168676615, 168680892, 168680909, 168680937, 168693810, 168693861, 168693935. commented 2025-07-09 17:53:21 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168676597 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:20 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168708079 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 443) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 168631271, 168631326, 168631334, 168631918, 168648673, 168675005, 168676597, 168676615, 168680892, 168680909, 168680937, 168693810, 168693861, 168693935. commented 2025-07-09 17:53:20 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168631326 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:20 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168648673 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168693861 (Comments: 2) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168631918 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168631334 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168680892 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:18 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168680937 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:18 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168693935 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:18 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168680909 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:17 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168676615 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:17 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168631271 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:16 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168675005 (Comments: 1) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:16 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168693810 (Comments: 2) | deduce Tech (Discussed changesets: 14) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:15 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,390 |
| 168705496 (Comments: 1) | Cmbc0883 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplicates the existing Rogers Stadium area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377018861 commented 2025-07-09 17:53:10 UTC by MerlinPendragon ♦30 |
| 168707582 (Comments: 1) | gasibey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi gasibey, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. T... commented 2025-07-09 17:46:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168685463 (Comments: 1) | stimme-logistik (Discussed changesets: 32) | Da fehlten Verbindungen - korrigiert commented 2025-07-09 17:46:12 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168707451 (Comments: 1) | redd (Discussed changesets: 76) | Die Beschränkungen habe ich desem Artikel der Stadt entnommen https://www.stuttgart.de/service/aktuelle-meldungen/2025/juni/radverkehr-profitiert-von-neuer-fahrradstrasse-am-bahnhofsplatz-in-bad-cannstatt.php (zweites Foto) commented 2025-07-09 17:37:12 UTC by redd ♦390 |
| 168617679 (Comments: 2) | s banerian (Discussed changesets: 5) | yep commented 2025-07-09 17:35:12 UTC by s banerian ♦2 |
| 168667309 (Comments: 1) | Stiefend (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sportvereine werden mit club=sport eingetragen. commented 2025-07-09 17:32:48 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,862 |
| 168667421 (Comments: 1) | Stiefend (Discussed changesets: 3) | Die drei Becken waren schon vorhanden: way 778620364 way 778620365 way 778620366 commented 2025-07-09 17:30:07 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,862 |
| 161981685 (Comments: 1) | Frédéric Brière (Discussed changesets: 4) | Vraiment cool tes mises à jour! J'importe les adresses de Sherbrooke et ça m'évite d'importer des adresses/bâtiments qui n'existent plus. commented 2025-07-09 17:26:10 UTC by jfd553 ♦55 |
| 168691499 (Comments: 1) | YOT-TAK-YOT (Discussed changesets: 17) | не надо вешать адреса на ворота. Адрес это свойство здания commented 2025-07-09 17:18:56 UTC by literan ♦6,699 |
| 167695628 (Comments: 1) | tkotnala_lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | This did not open until today. Please do not rely on aerial imagery to remove construction as that may be severely outdated. Also, OSM has a policy against using imagery without a license. commented 2025-07-09 17:18:37 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦93 |
| 168680547 (Comments: 2) | Seaside83 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Just wanted to say that I always see your edits in Sacramento, and came across this changeset while looking for something else. I appreciate all the work you put in to make the map better! --- Published u... commented 2025-07-09 17:11:04 UTC by spatialia ♦20 |
| 168679640 (Comments: 1) | kendalroy (Discussed changesets: 2) | As a note, it's OK for the trees to be individually mapped, even if the forest polygon is mapped. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168679640 commented 2025-07-09 17:08:42 UTC by spatialia ♦20 |
| 166112952 (Comments: 3) | fabien lzu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fabien, why have you joined the waterways you tagged as canals here to the water=river area of the river, and not to the river way itself? Most waterways in OSM start life as open ways with some never recieving a water=river area so based on my un... commented 2025-07-09 17:07:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦649 |
 | 168622708 (Comments: 2) | Maple_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thanks for reaching out. I had intended to add the tag as “name:ps”, but instead added the full language name. I have updated the tag with the correct syntax. Have a nice day! commented 2025-07-09 17:02:06 UTC by Maple_ ♦2 |
| 168624284 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 44) | Because "County Road x" (where x is a number) is a highway designation, not an actual name. Sometimes, the county routes have an actual name tagged in their "alt_name," which I used as their actual name. commented 2025-07-09 16:56:11 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦51 |
| 168697215 (Comments: 1) | universedestroyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | колледж связи уже отмечен, не нужно дублировать ну и мнения о шаурме тоже не надо вносить ) commented 2025-07-09 16:54:41 UTC by literan ♦6,699 |
| 119296440 (Comments: 3) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 109) | Ok top, merci de ta réponse rapide :D commented 2025-07-09 16:54:28 UTC by Arflha ♦15 |
| 167771515 (Comments: 1) | Thatgirl304 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, please do not revert my reversions without responding to the concerns I spelled out in a comment under your previous changesets, including this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165607704 OpenStreetMap relies on effective collab... commented 2025-07-09 16:44:09 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦52 |
| 168675691 (Comments: 1) | Addis B (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: drive-through ways typically do not have a name, aka descriptive name. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168675691 commented 2025-07-09 16:42:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 167965733 (Comments: 2) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo, Till_E, Mail an Dich ist auf dem Weg! Grüße aus Herborn Andreas commented 2025-07-09 16:34:27 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦125 |
| 168649762 (Comments: 1) | NoFlockingWay (Discussed changesets: 2) | It appears you dragged some nodes on landuse polygons when adding the flock device. I have reverted this and two subsequent changesets because of the damage done. The rest of your edits look ok. --- Publi... commented 2025-07-09 16:33:23 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168371317 (Comments: 2) | aakkkaa (Discussed changesets: 8) | Здравствуйте. Спасибо, буду знать. Я сделал это по примеру переулка Фолюш, где тоже знак жилой зоны. commented 2025-07-09 16:31:45 UTC by aakkkaa ♦4 |
| 168616114 (Comments: 1) | Schank Group LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, and thanks for your contributions. Another user Ezra Jenks has pointed out that some or all of these trails are still frequently (possibly illegally?) used by the public. However your private access tags remain in place. https://www.openstreetmap... commented 2025-07-09 16:17:30 UTC by Xvtn ♦470 |
| 168666744 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 44) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mountain-west-automated-road-route-road-name-changes/132498 Please join! commented 2025-07-09 16:06:06 UTC by SD Mapman ♦42 |
 | 167546704 (Comments: 2) | BroharrisCanal (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more r... commented 2025-07-09 15:57:00 UTC by BroharrisCanal ♦2 |
| 167789256 (Comments: 1) | baiense74 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Olá baiense74, Estive revisando esta edição. No geral está bom. Apenas com a ressalva de que a marcação de vias como highway=tertiary se restringe às vias importantes locais, que são as c... commented 2025-07-09 15:38:51 UTC by santamariense ♦821 |
| 168698072 (Comments: 1) | alessandrocarmeli (Discussed changesets: 133) | Ciao, sembra che la tua ultima modifica abbia "rotto" nel senso che hai eliminato un pezzo a 3 relation (nella zona di via Roma): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2925532 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2925533 https:/... commented 2025-07-09 15:10:32 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦103 |
| 137436019 (Comments: 2) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hallo Werner, Het is ondertussen al meer dan twee jaar geleden dat ik hier voor het laatst ben geweest. Ik kan mij de specifieke details niet meer herinneren. Gelijk heb jij dat `Herdenkingsmonument` zeer waarschijnlijk overbodig is. V... commented 2025-07-09 14:45:53 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168626436 (Comments: 3) | samon53 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for correcting my typo. commented 2025-07-09 14:44:03 UTC by DaveF ♦1,566 |
| 167089465 (Comments: 1) | pittrichimica (Discussed changesets: 67) | Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044479985 : hoe kom je aan de maxspeed=33 (km/h)? commented 2025-07-09 14:41:57 UTC by BAGgeraar ♦57 |
| 159786532 (Comments: 4) | martin_schnurer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Potom by tam skorej bolo pridať oneway=yes a oneway:bus=no :) commented 2025-07-09 14:31:06 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦24 |
| 167624749 (Comments: 3) | joshnolan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Appreciate your review! I'm indeed using aerial imagery correctly, with a fixed offset of (-1,-0.25) for the whole city when using the Bing imagery. Thanks for the second eye! I've used Mapillary (and some dedication haha). I invite you ... commented 2025-07-09 14:16:44 UTC by joshnolan ♦1 |
| 6841645 (Comments: 1) | t_ja (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ahoj, viem, že to bolo dávno, ale nepamätáš sa prečo, resp. či ešte je tu zákaz vjazdu? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93099542 commented 2025-07-09 14:11:01 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦24 |
| 168594536 (Comments: 3) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 7) | 😉👍 commented 2025-07-09 14:06:34 UTC by b-holdet ♦317 |
| 136365242 (Comments: 1) | stocazzo4t34q4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ciao, ma la fermata dell'autobus dove si trova? non penso che si trovi dentro a un parco, graize :) commented 2025-07-09 14:02:23 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦51 |
| 144880110 (Comments: 1) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 33) | mh, moving address from building, però tocchi pure le fermate bus? come mai? commented 2025-07-09 13:59:48 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦51 |
| 161424464 (Comments: 3) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 393) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre alerte et pour votre aide. Nous avons nettoyé tous les siret en question. Désolé pour le désagrément Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-07-09 13:53:54 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦234 |
| 168187262 (Comments: 2) | RomanCzerkies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Benoît, Merci beaucoup pour ton retour. J'ai voulu ajouter de la cohérence avec la Route de la Ceinture du Lac Daumesnil (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11832583#map=17/48.830928/2.413881) Sur place, c&... commented 2025-07-09 13:49:51 UTC by RomanCzerkies ♦2 |
| 168454587 (Comments: 5) | Yuval Aboulafia (Discussed changesets: 10) | agree, thanks commented 2025-07-09 13:42:33 UTC by yrtimiD ♦984 |
| 166809403 (Comments: 12) | ssummoner1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Működni fognak most már geofabrikon a light_rail címkéjű vasútvonalak: https://github.com/geofabrik/osmi_pubtrans3/pull/10#event-18544949202 Merged 🎉🎉 commented 2025-07-09 13:41:55 UTC by ssummoner1 ♦22 |
| 168684976 (Comments: 1) | Ghaaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, nur weil ich zufällig gerade gesehen habe das du hier info boards editierst. Der "Titel" oder die "Überschrift" des Infoboards sollte eher in board:title nicht in name. name ist wirklich nur f&uum... commented 2025-07-09 13:33:27 UTC by flohoff ♦2,364 |
| 168597766 (Comments: 1) | ArjanJager (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dat pad lag er al maar dan een paar meter verderop. Ik heb de oude versie verwijderd. commented 2025-07-09 13:28:27 UTC by goedegazelle ♦241 |
| 139866244 (Comments: 5) | Mrborkander (Discussed changesets: 2) | I recently biked through here, so the photos are available here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1207689734465017&focus=photo / https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=732016132572944&focus=photo . It is indeed still the typical 301+84... commented 2025-07-09 13:21:04 UTC by HellMap ♦676 |
| 168421391 (Comments: 1) | mdonmap (Discussed changesets: 10) | Why did you shift the Refuge boundary to mean high tide? NWRs extend to mean low. commented 2025-07-09 13:05:22 UTC by dru1138 ♦11 |
| 168610633 (Comments: 11) | K_Sakanoshita (Discussed changesets: 5) | 実際、建物の庇やルーフ、建物同士を繋げる廊下など、壁や屋根が繋がっている例は多々あります。 これらは同じ壁や屋根を共有していますが、同じノードを共有しつつ、エリア... commented 2025-07-09 13:04:16 UTC by K_Sakanoshita ♦12 |
| 168631746 (Comments: 4) | tatsiana-krauchanka (Discussed changesets: 5) | I truly appreciate knowing that my work is helpful. It means a lot to our team! Best regards, tatsiana-krauchanka commented 2025-07-09 12:59:42 UTC by tatsiana-krauchanka ♦3 |
| 168686826 (Comments: 3) | Tomas Straupis (Discussed changesets: 76) | Ačiū. Jo su orto ten nemaža dalis nekažką yra. Tai dedu iš akies :) commented 2025-07-09 12:58:51 UTC by DaanLT ♦106 |
| 168694405 (Comments: 1) | visionarymarketing814 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi visionarymarketing814, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the co... commented 2025-07-09 12:57:14 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168694419 (Comments: 1) | greenenergymech (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-09 12:51:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 166249526 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hyvä huomio, kiitos commented 2025-07-09 12:44:52 UTC by liljaadeliina ♦39 |
| 161288200 (Comments: 1) | PseudoMortus (Discussed changesets: 1) | This restaurant is now closed, forgot to update here. Should I create a new ticket or will this comment suffice? commented 2025-07-09 12:37:10 UTC by PseudoMortus ♦1 |
| 168693718 (Comments: 1) | Natsu_ (Discussed changesets: 20) | 公共汽车939路更新。 commented 2025-07-09 12:32:16 UTC by Natsu_ ♦19 |
| 159724553 (Comments: 2) | pia31ma (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't know either commented 2025-07-09 12:26:17 UTC by KlopanRin ♦27 |
| 168664070 (Comments: 1) | Hegedűs Lajos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdvözöllek az OSM közösségben! Az általad hiányolt kereskedelmi egységeket nem elég elnevezni, de a térképelemen címkézni kell a funkciót is. A gazdabol... commented 2025-07-09 12:19:06 UTC by feket ♦36 |
| 82317153 (Comments: 1) | Xaver1002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, du hast hier [1] fixme=Testeingabe eingetragen, kann das weg oder gibt es den Überflurhydranten hinterm FwH tatsächlich? :) Viele Grüße David https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7304139780 commented 2025-07-09 11:53:18 UTC by dadavid ♦421 |
| 168056064 (Comments: 1) | Németh Attila (Discussed changesets: 11) | Szia! Attól még, hogy egy járda sövénnyel el van választva az úttesttől, lehet járda. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks Járdán/gyalogúton felesle... commented 2025-07-09 11:48:49 UTC by ITineris ♦372 |
| 168691278 (Comments: 1) | jeanniecleaning (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-09 11:39:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168648654 (Comments: 1) | le-samourai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-09 11:37:06 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168691226 (Comments: 1) | Natsu_ (Discussed changesets: 20) | 公共汽车B931路升级M143路。 东纵路平环地铁站路段施工结束恢复原位。 坪山区新建道路完善。 commented 2025-07-09 11:36:26 UTC by Natsu_ ♦19 |
| 168517044 (Comments: 2) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 55) | They are disappearing :( ... hopefully because people found a better way to make a living commented 2025-07-09 11:31:11 UTC by rhhs ♦123 |
| 168642176 (Comments: 2) | aldexdepalex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alle begin is moeilijk: Je hebt hier ook de adres gegevens verwijderd van de kaart, en dat is natuurlijk niet de bedoeling. Ik zal de adres-node herstellen. commented 2025-07-09 11:30:59 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 167215860 (Comments: 9) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 13) | Rendben, köszi nagyon! commented 2025-07-09 11:23:11 UTC by Fiorentina ♦2 |
| 168688706 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 46) | Onko tuo parempi nimi? commented 2025-07-09 11:12:01 UTC by Larmax ♦271 |
| 168682754 (Comments: 3) | paul_sncf_connect (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the effort. I saw that you have made a lot of great contributions recently! commented 2025-07-09 11:07:48 UTC by TheNewCivilian ♦6 |
| 168636297 (Comments: 1) | Wesselverbouwexpert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-09 11:06:42 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168632638 (Comments: 2) | Tandartspraktijk Zijdelward (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alleen een naam doet niets op de kaart. Ik heb amenity=dentist toegevoegd. commented 2025-07-09 11:01:22 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168684337 (Comments: 1) | Koduru_Dedeepya _131526 (Discussed changesets: 2) | #NameTag Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem ... commented 2025-07-09 10:51:24 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168631807 (Comments: 1) | Dadde Wiek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-09 10:48:09 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168685091 (Comments: 1) | Soczek2752 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Jesteś jak złoto. Znów coś z naciskiem na coś poprawiłeś a czasem dla odmiany klepniesz update. Już ci pisałem coś na ten temat. Skończy się to wysłaniem do DWG i będzie ci przykro. --- ... commented 2025-07-09 10:45:24 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦465 |
| 168622846 (Comments: 1) | prinshoek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-09 10:32:13 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168508534 (Comments: 1) | LudovicG (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, pour les parkings en bord de rue, je vous recommande d'ajouter "parking=street_side" ou "parking=lane" en fonction des cas, sinon ils sont affichés de très loin sur les cartes commented 2025-07-09 10:32:06 UTC by atchisson ♦11 |
| 168653991 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 357) | Thanks, that's indeed a better way to tag this situation. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168653991 commented 2025-07-09 10:28:20 UTC by s8evq ♦188 |
| 168665147 (Comments: 6) | tomzis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke für die Mühe und die Info. Schöne Grüße commented 2025-07-09 10:24:42 UTC by tomzis ♦1 |
| 168620146 (Comments: 1) | Hujaki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-09 10:21:51 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168617277 (Comments: 1) | ingmapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Leo Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-07-09 10:20:10 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,234 |
| 168558409 (Comments: 5) | Pawelaa (Discussed changesets: 20) | @szalona_entropia Masz na mysli forum tutaj?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#Zestawienie_dr%C3%B3g_2 commented 2025-07-09 10:19:59 UTC by Pawelaa ♦4 |
| 166381780 (Comments: 1) | Lunamiou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pluto beau est à côté, le labo est bien ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168687901 commented 2025-07-09 10:16:42 UTC by atchisson ♦11 |
| 112480436 (Comments: 2) | Yod4z (Discussed changesets: 28) | sorry id bug some time ^^ corrected commented 2025-07-09 10:05:39 UTC by Yod4z ♦26 |
| 168686508 (Comments: 1) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Based on OSM Wiki and visual observation via Bing Streetside it can be seen that the tag "building=yes" in addition to other tags does not suit these objects --- Published using OSMCha: https://... commented 2025-07-09 10:03:29 UTC by squeaker_andrus ♦2 |
| 168466685 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 44) | You created version 1 of that relation... commented 2025-07-09 09:58:45 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦559 |
| 168255568 (Comments: 2) | Barry Carmody (Discussed changesets: 2) | Apologies Victor, inadvertently deleted with a no longer existing by-road. Now fixed. commented 2025-07-09 09:54:38 UTC by Barry Carmody ♦1 |
| 168656054 (Comments: 6) | arnaufolch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Les normes d'etiquetatge d'OSM indiquen que un natural=peak no és açò, sinó el cim d'una muntanya. Este punt tampoc no és un coll ni un mountaint_pass. Per tant, considere que hauria d'eliminar-s... commented 2025-07-09 09:54:36 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,628 |
| 167912142 (Comments: 3) | FraukeLeo (Discussed changesets: 25) | Vorort existiert zumindest nördlich um Wallbach die Beschilderung so wie sie im OSM Wiki dokumentiert ist (also Verkehrsschild 250 und VZ 1026-36): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=agricultural Das erwähnte Schild 260 h... commented 2025-07-09 09:38:37 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 167846932 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686181 commented 2025-07-09 09:37:58 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 167933934 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686181 commented 2025-07-09 09:37:58 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 167933882 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686181 commented 2025-07-09 09:37:58 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 167847773 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686181 commented 2025-07-09 09:37:58 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168188921 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:37 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168187684 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:37 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168188123 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:37 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168188146 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:37 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168008912 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:36 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168100980 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:36 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168016134 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:36 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168015863 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:36 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168013559 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:36 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168013402 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686036 commented 2025-07-09 09:35:36 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168669334 (Comments: 2) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:34:02 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168599909 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:34:02 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168503267 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:34:01 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168597383 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:34:01 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168597901 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:34:01 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168502788 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:34:00 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168503069 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:34:00 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168502808 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:34:00 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168502765 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:33:59 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168501857 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168685923 commented 2025-07-09 09:33:59 UTC by xkillah ♦73 |
| 168685668 (Comments: 1) | Navguy (Discussed changesets: 2) | This street cannot be "translated" into Basque. Its real and original name is restored. commented 2025-07-09 09:32:49 UTC by Navguy ♦2 |
| 168563255 (Comments: 2) | Matssi (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oups ! Effectivement, j'ai fait via StreetComplete sans vérifier... commented 2025-07-09 09:32:35 UTC by Matssi ♦5 |
| 168641993 (Comments: 2) | HopeyMaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thank you so much for the feedback. I really appreciate the effort you put into it. It's unfortunate that I do not have a mentor to assist me, I just watched the recording from the last UN Mappers webinar. I am very eager to l... commented 2025-07-09 09:28:52 UTC by HopeyMaps ♦1 |
| 168670094 (Comments: 1) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 194) | Szia! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12546271150 crossing_ref helyett manapság a crossing:markings-ot használjuk, sokkal részletesebben le lehet írni felfestéseket: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... commented 2025-07-09 09:27:06 UTC by infeeeee ♦526 |
| 168646403 (Comments: 2) | Mbg79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. I agree with your input. I found this tip on a reddit forum. We have now tried changing it to driveways, but couldnt figure out the whole procedure you refered to, with highway=service, then service=driveway. Will look into that. Thank yo... commented 2025-07-09 09:25:29 UTC by Mbg79 ♦1 |
| 167774850 (Comments: 6) | andrew85 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ha pedig a jogszabály alkalmazását preferálod, javaslom a közigazgatásban való elhelyezkedést, ott még fizetnek is érte :) commented 2025-07-09 09:23:14 UTC by balint36 ♦207 |
| 168684974 (Comments: 1) | bhavana123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #NameTag Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem ... commented 2025-07-09 09:21:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168642434 (Comments: 10) | TeamDELKO (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok merci pour les exemples, ça va m'aider. Merci pour votre aide, je découvre vraiment l'outil et l'univers de la cartographie, d'où mes interrogations un peu redondantes... commented 2025-07-09 09:17:40 UTC by TeamDELKO ♦6 |
| 168590124 (Comments: 1) | DuzceMebis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Just a test edit? commented 2025-07-09 09:15:53 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168674933 (Comments: 1) | gnoye (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Gnoye. Don't run the validator tool before you upload your work ? It shows errors like not using the right tag for layer at a bridge and not connected waterways Best regards commented 2025-07-09 09:15:03 UTC by Frans S ♦9,821 |
| 168591548 (Comments: 1) | douxreveurs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Just a test edit? commented 2025-07-09 09:15:01 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
 | 168599857 (Comments: 1) | 212COM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just a test? commented 2025-07-09 09:14:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168657647 (Comments: 1) | Shweta Pochiraju (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168657553 commented 2025-07-09 09:13:43 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168657553 (Comments: 1) | Shweta Pochiraju (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168657647 commented 2025-07-09 09:13:35 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168662385 (Comments: 1) | JUNIOR BAGGIO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168662332 commented 2025-07-09 09:12:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168662332 (Comments: 1) | JUNIOR BAGGIO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168662385 commented 2025-07-09 09:12:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168680850 (Comments: 1) | Wanderer130 (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) That looks fine, thanks for updating it. commented 2025-07-09 09:10:18 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,478 |
| 168684088 (Comments: 1) | CAM-Gerlach (Discussed changesets: 3) | *And also add/merge complete address tagging --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168684088 commented 2025-07-09 09:10:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦26 |
| 168664868 (Comments: 2) | HFoc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Als reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168684577 commented 2025-07-09 09:08:35 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168684236 (Comments: 1) | Koduru_Dedeepya _131526 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Koduru_Dedeepya _131526, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the ... commented 2025-07-09 09:06:59 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168684459 (Comments: 1) | Natsu_ (Discussed changesets: 20) | 公交线路M447路改M369路，路线关系中删除福田区、龙华区的成员。 commented 2025-07-09 09:05:41 UTC by Natsu_ ♦19 |
| 167517435 (Comments: 3) | andrew85 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ahogy mondod. Van olyan, ahol nem táblázzuk, mégis alkalmazzuk (mondjuk az autópálya kezdete táblával mégis táblázunk valamilyen módon). De ez a helyesen ellátott c&i... commented 2025-07-09 09:02:16 UTC by balint36 ♦207 |
| 168684311 (Comments: 1) | Ryan Watern (Discussed changesets: 14) | The old northbound lane bridge is also slated for demolition, but for now it’s still there and when demo is close to completion the bridge will be removed if someone else didn’t remove it by then. commented 2025-07-09 09:01:20 UTC by Ryan Watern ♦6 |
| 168681273 (Comments: 1) | gnoye (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello Gnoye. A small detail. A bridge ought to be tagged with layer=1 instead of level=1 Best regards commented 2025-07-09 08:56:25 UTC by Frans S ♦9,821 |
| 168630174 (Comments: 2) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 5) | G'day, Thank you for the feedback....and the tips are sure useful and for quick edits... Have a great day ahead and great weekdays commented 2025-07-09 08:43:30 UTC by BholeKiBhasam ♦3 |
| 168515417 (Comments: 2) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 18) | In OSM werden für gewöhnlich keine Ortsbezeichnungen als Straßenname eingetragen. Die sollten noch vom Basemap.at import stammen. Aber falls du lokal knowledge hast, ist deine Meinung da sicherlich korrekter. commented 2025-07-09 08:42:42 UTC by vikiawv ♦15 |
| 168443213 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 16) | I didn't survey it, but the address on their website matches and you can make out their logo on the gas station on Bing Streetside commented 2025-07-09 08:38:18 UTC by cuzi ♦118 |
| 167370515 (Comments: 3) | NVBW_Edit_7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Rainer, Danke für den Link! Immer spannend, was für überraschende Welten sich einem über OSM öffnen :-) Ich habe name gelöscht und durch eine ordentliche description ersetzt. Viele Grü&szl... commented 2025-07-09 08:17:01 UTC by Metzor ♦369 |
| 168651700 (Comments: 1) | ItsLouisAnderson (Discussed changesets: 7) | the more i look at this, the more errors i notice, please just use the road nodes and trace the boundaries accordingly in major cities. commented 2025-07-09 08:05:00 UTC by doggosmile ♦3 |
| 168619996 (Comments: 3) | Davidos64bot (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour cela me laisse très perplexe... Déjà sur l'usage de ce tag adresse ailleurs que le reste de l'adresse (n°, rue...), une adresse pouvant être affectée à un bâtiment ou à... commented 2025-07-09 07:58:51 UTC by Patchanka ♦385 |
| 151963612 (Comments: 3) | spiregrain (Discussed changesets: 46) | Corrected in changeset 168681504. If you come across a few similar errors, feel free to correct them. If it looks like I've systematically made this error in loads of places, please let me know, and I'll fire up JOSM at the weekend... commented 2025-07-09 07:53:28 UTC by spiregrain ♦198 |
| 166062578 (Comments: 2) | bennyboon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gibt es Schilder, die den Weg als Fahrradweg ausweisen? Wenn nicht, könnte bicycle=yes besser passen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated --- Published using OSMCha:... commented 2025-07-09 07:42:30 UTC by Osmwithspace ♦163 |
| 165599047 (Comments: 1) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 8) | Passt denke ich. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165599047 commented 2025-07-09 07:33:55 UTC by Osmwithspace ♦163 |
| 168544690 (Comments: 3) | w1ngfoot (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed Mi Sueno. Thanks for the info! commented 2025-07-09 07:25:33 UTC by pwbriggs ♦41 |
| 168680528 (Comments: 1) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 38) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168383668 commented 2025-07-09 07:25:05 UTC by ayxis ♦55 |
| 168383668 (Comments: 3) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 38) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168680528 commented 2025-07-09 07:24:56 UTC by ayxis ♦55 |
| 168622422 (Comments: 1) | s banerian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oops, looks like you accidentally moved a node in a road, I didn't catch that earlier. Reverting that node change. Thanks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168679902 commented 2025-07-09 07:08:21 UTC by pwbriggs ♦41 |
| 151233568 (Comments: 3) | Rijk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kijk maar naar de tags die ik heb toegevoegd. OSM is een database. Met dit soort tags kan een kaartenmaker een kaart maken met bijvoorbeeld alleen zaken uit WW2. commented 2025-07-09 07:06:13 UTC by Op'tRad ♦33 |
| 168618349 (Comments: 4) | s banerian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks! commented 2025-07-09 07:04:19 UTC by pwbriggs ♦41 |
| 168557648 (Comments: 2) | GEO2day (Discussed changesets: 5) | Спасибо за внесение исправления commented 2025-07-09 06:59:47 UTC by dypa ♦120 |
| 168637518 (Comments: 1) | GEO2day (Discussed changesets: 5) | Здравствуйте, вы продублировали данные по адресу для https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150373875. Пожалуйста остановите автоматический импорт и решите про... commented 2025-07-09 06:59:30 UTC by dypa ♦120 |
| 168593346 (Comments: 3) | OSMchik (Discussed changesets: 33) | Спасибо за оперативное внесение изменений! При возможности проверю на местности наличие детских площадок. commented 2025-07-09 06:57:57 UTC by dypa ♦120 |
| 168651832 (Comments: 1) | Hung Tran 9x0 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Note rất chi tiết. Rất cám ơn bạn. Hi vọng có dịp gặp bạn ỏ Hà Nội giao lưu OpenStreetMap và Mapillary. commented 2025-07-09 06:55:11 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦232 |
| 168647645 (Comments: 1) | hoanganh2911 (Discussed changesets: 3) | các loại đường thuộc khu công nghiệp nên để service bạn nhé. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice commented 2025-07-09 06:52:23 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦232 |
| 168644953 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 393) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre alerte. Effectivement, c'est une erreur de notre part, nous avons fait la correction nécessaire Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-07-09 06:43:08 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦234 |
| 168669544 (Comments: 2) | LPerry2UW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM and congrats on your first edits! (Yes, smaller changesets help reviews.) Looked at a few changes, and they look pretty good! I went ahead and added some type tags (bank, post office), expanded some abbreviated street names and so... commented 2025-07-09 06:36:26 UTC by seattlefyi ♦372 |
| 168581442 (Comments: 4) | olo81 (Discussed changesets: 99) | Możesz zmienić. Z tego co wczoraj patrzyłem to jeszcze coś jest nie tak z routingiem na tych drogach dla osrm. Ciężko stwierdzić co. commented 2025-07-09 06:27:34 UTC by olo81 ♦671 |
 | 168673738 (Comments: 1) | AlexFromLinux (Discussed changesets: 1) | #NameCheck Hello and welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified. Some of these names caught my attention a... commented 2025-07-09 06:23:42 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168618343 (Comments: 1) | WilliamHarrison (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi WilliamHarrison, your change was correct in principle, but it broke the bicycle routes. I have fixed that again. johsin18 commented 2025-07-09 06:19:04 UTC by johsin18 ♦159 |
 | 150126179 (Comments: 1) | Malaalaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | I noticed when doing some sanity checks on OSM data that the West Guji relation seems to be invalid. Would you or someone familiar with the area be able to fix it? Thanks! commented 2025-07-09 06:13:17 UTC by Ian Wagner ♦7 |
| 129594635 (Comments: 3) | Mar Mar (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thank you for the quick reply! commented 2025-07-09 05:55:40 UTC by PcMouse1 ♦61 |
| 168676264 (Comments: 2) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18426 commented 2025-07-09 05:43:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 167767594 (Comments: 1) | Stefan HEINZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Stefan, der Zufahrtsweg hängt in der Luft und ist nicht mit dem Straßennetz verbunden. Ist das auch wirklich ein neuer paralleler Weg, oder Teil des vorhandenen nördlichen Tracks? commented 2025-07-09 05:40:50 UTC by Luzandro ♦910 |
| 168450863 (Comments: 1) | Sikhah Arum (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Sikhah Arum, Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I would request you to follow the community editing guideline when you upload the changesets. Please add appropriate comments that represent your edits/changes in the data. |
| 168575148 (Comments: 1) | Paul Todd (Discussed changesets: 5) | 方便的话可以顺便看一下道路等级，我感觉嘉善郊区道路等级都有点偏高 commented 2025-07-09 05:09:06 UTC by Phybbyemu ♦9 |
| 168676214 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676318 commented 2025-07-09 04:49:18 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168676176 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676318 commented 2025-07-09 04:49:18 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168676205 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676318 commented 2025-07-09 04:49:18 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168676166 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676318 commented 2025-07-09 04:49:17 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168676161 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676318 commented 2025-07-09 04:49:17 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168676255 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676305 commented 2025-07-09 04:48:33 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168676237 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676305 commented 2025-07-09 04:48:32 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168676231 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676305 commented 2025-07-09 04:48:32 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168676226 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676305 commented 2025-07-09 04:48:32 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675926 (Comments: 1) | RidePenang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-09 04:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168675734 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675876 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:52 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675745 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675876 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:52 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675711 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675876 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:51 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675722 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675876 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:51 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675729 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675876 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:51 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 167589183 (Comments: 1) | wilsonmere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are we sure highway=primary is the correct classification of Gunpowder Rd? It should be reserved for "a major highway linking large towns" which doesn't seem correct here commented 2025-07-09 04:25:46 UTC by steveman1123 ♦4 |
| 168675809 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675862 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:22 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675803 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675862 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:22 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675792 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675862 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:21 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675781 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675862 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:21 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675753 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675862 commented 2025-07-09 04:25:20 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675256 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675514 commented 2025-07-09 04:07:59 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675198 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675514 commented 2025-07-09 04:07:58 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675183 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675514 commented 2025-07-09 04:07:58 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675191 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675514 commented 2025-07-09 04:07:58 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675240 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675514 commented 2025-07-09 04:07:58 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675284 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675495 commented 2025-07-09 04:06:59 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675279 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675495 commented 2025-07-09 04:06:59 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675264 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675495 commented 2025-07-09 04:06:59 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675273 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675495 commented 2025-07-09 04:06:59 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168675262 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675495 commented 2025-07-09 04:06:58 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168486157 (Comments: 3) | MacksX (Discussed changesets: 3) | Det kan ju vara att det stod att den klarade max 138 kV, men att man ändå kör mer normala 132 kV. Jag har ingen koll på vad man faktiskt kör i ledningarna. 132 kV ser ju mer normalt ut, så för mig behöver... commented 2025-07-09 03:52:42 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦601 |
| 168658879 (Comments: 1) | HoangQuanHDFPV (Discussed changesets: 4) | Anh hãy thêm cột alt_name: Song Hành Xa Lộ Hà Nội nữa nhé. Vì rất nhiều số nhà ở đây còn dính với tên đường cũ này. Rất cám ơn anh. commented 2025-07-09 03:25:16 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦232 |
| 168666079 (Comments: 1) | HoangQuanHDFPV (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tên đường trên VietmapLive và OSM thì không có liên quan gì đâu anh nhé. Anh có thể liên hệ trực tiếp bên Vietmap để cập nhật. commented 2025-07-09 03:23:55 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦232 |
| 168673431 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674389 commented 2025-07-09 03:02:03 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168673420 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674389 commented 2025-07-09 03:02:03 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168673426 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674389 commented 2025-07-09 03:02:03 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168673416 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674389 commented 2025-07-09 03:02:03 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168673471 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674379 commented 2025-07-09 03:01:26 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168673458 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674379 commented 2025-07-09 03:01:25 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168673468 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674379 commented 2025-07-09 03:01:25 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168673448 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674379 commented 2025-07-09 03:01:24 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672508 (Comments: 1) | Bin Xiao (Discussed changesets: 1) | 中文名字為國巨龜山廠 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168672508 commented 2025-07-09 02:53:12 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,446 |
| 150517438 (Comments: 2) | Jota Cartas (Discussed changesets: 11) | Viva António Madeira, Desculpe só responder agora, mas os mails da OSM estavam a ir todos para SPAM. Já fiz a alteração no Castelo de Óbidos conforme indicado. Cumprimentos, João Lemos commented 2025-07-09 02:41:54 UTC by Jota Cartas ♦3 |
| 168467423 (Comments: 2) | upliftingcat (Discussed changesets: 2) | I did not hear back from you so I changed the roads I mentioned in the previous comment back to their original names. commented 2025-07-09 02:30:44 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168665133 (Comments: 3) | Resist2020 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry I'm not sure where you're getting 9% from. The link you provide for `currency:XBT` shows 7.35% with a combination of `building=*`. This key is fairly small in terms of sample size though, only having around 17,000 uses. Checkin... commented 2025-07-09 02:24:23 UTC by CorruptComputer ♦66 |
| 168627812 (Comments: 1) | arbeit52 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: when edits in distant areas, save and upload before editing in a distant place. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168627812 commented 2025-07-09 02:03:37 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168661847 (Comments: 2) | Jota Cartas (Discussed changesets: 11) | yes, you are wright. I was trying to create the historical parish boundary of Agualva-Cacém, and I was having some difficulties. I think everything is fine now. commented 2025-07-09 02:03:03 UTC by Jota Cartas ♦3 |
| 168626114 (Comments: 1) | s banerian (Discussed changesets: 5) | #TIP: when a business closes, remove the business tags but leave the address, it is likely to be reused. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168626114 commented 2025-07-09 02:00:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168617566 (Comments: 1) | s banerian (Discussed changesets: 5) | #TIP: square houses by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168617566 commented 2025-07-09 01:56:02 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168575858 (Comments: 2) | Schorr (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'd highly recommend to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel page as your starting guide. If you have any questions - feel free to ask local or global community in forums or telegram groups (links are in wiki page) commented 2025-07-09 01:51:26 UTC by yrtimiD ♦984 |
 | 168673134 (Comments: 1) | Bilal Jaber (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Bilal Jaber, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment fiel... commented 2025-07-09 01:48:02 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 165637232 (Comments: 1) | stanchen_osm (Discussed changesets: 3) | 您好： 健行路線關聯於魯地圖上屬於“建議路線”性質，可以從風格樣式中選擇開啟或關閉，並不會改變路徑的實質名稱。 許多縱走路線因為山徑的彼此連接中間會經過一些公路... commented 2025-07-09 01:39:21 UTC by 狄惠貴 ♦4 |
| 167995594 (Comments: 2) | phoenixsaigon1698 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Ừa đoạn này thấy có xe quay đầu được lê Lợi -> Lê Lợi (hướng đi Nguyễn Huệ). Đồng thời không có biển cấm quay đầu commented 2025-07-09 01:28:11 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦232 |
| 168672648 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672775 commented 2025-07-09 01:10:26 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672645 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672775 commented 2025-07-09 01:10:26 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672639 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672775 commented 2025-07-09 01:10:25 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672621 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672775 commented 2025-07-09 01:10:25 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672602 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672775 commented 2025-07-09 01:10:24 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672620 (Comments: 1) | Ewrt1 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Also changed branding of areas commented 2025-07-09 01:09:22 UTC by Ewrt1 ♦46 |
| 168672673 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672753 commented 2025-07-09 01:09:17 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672678 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672753 commented 2025-07-09 01:09:17 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672652 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672753 commented 2025-07-09 01:09:16 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672659 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672753 commented 2025-07-09 01:09:16 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672027 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. 168672120 168672116 168672111 168672099 168672091 168672063 168672035 168672027 commented 2025-07-09 00:47:03 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672035 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. 168672120 168672116 168672111 168672099 168672091 168672063 168672035 168672027 commented 2025-07-09 00:46:56 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672063 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. 168672120 168672116 168672111 168672099 168672091 168672063 168672035 168672027 commented 2025-07-09 00:46:49 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672091 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. 168672120 168672116 168672111 168672099 168672091 168672063 168672035 168672027 commented 2025-07-09 00:46:38 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672099 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. 168672120 168672116 168672111 168672099 168672091 168672063 168672035 168672027 commented 2025-07-09 00:46:32 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672111 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. 168672120 168672116 168672111 168672099 168672091 168672063 168672035 168672027 commented 2025-07-09 00:46:25 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672116 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. 168672120 168672116 168672111 168672099 168672091 168672063 168672035 168672027 commented 2025-07-09 00:46:14 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168672120 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. 168672120 168672116 168672111 168672099 168672091 168672063 168672035 168672027 commented 2025-07-09 00:46:07 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168670575 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 44) | For clarification, a freeway connection isn't required for a road to be primary—just criteria to consider—especially because Sahara Ave directly connects to many other important roadways along its route. D.I. Road and 5th Street for ... commented 2025-07-09 00:43:33 UTC by Joseph R P ♦353 |
| 168617250 (Comments: 1) | Lodahl Family (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: We spell out street names in OSM, the reason is that software has a hard time expanding abbreviated names. I noticed you added a few abbreviations. If you could expand them that would be much appreciated. --- ... commented 2025-07-09 00:41:28 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168610392 (Comments: 5) | ArizonaMapper (Discussed changesets: 29) | As previously mentioned, the canal is one conceptual object and thus should have one area representing the area it takes up. It is also significantly easier when edits to one part of the canal do not generate a changeset comment the geographic size o... commented 2025-07-09 00:36:46 UTC by Udarian ♦411 |
 | 168419145 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hola Lolj Genial que agregues detalles de ríos y quebradas. Te quería comentar que puedes ver estas contribuciones en waterwaymap.org. Ahí también puedes ver los "bucles" que uno puede generar al poner ... commented 2025-07-09 00:30:18 UTC by AngocA ♦197 |
| 155556384 (Comments: 3) | MarvinMep (Discussed changesets: 20) | MarvinMep, obrigada pelo esclarecimento. commented 2025-07-09 00:14:27 UTC by Raquel Dezidério Souto ♦16 |
| 168647436 (Comments: 2) | BarryMyles (Discussed changesets: 14) | "a" ?!? commented 2025-07-08 23:51:55 UTC by BarryMyles ♦10 |
| 168669478 (Comments: 2) | Adam Lanza (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18425 commented 2025-07-08 23:37:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 168669454 (Comments: 1) | Adam Lanza (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - sock puppet & vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168671455 commented 2025-07-08 23:37:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 168669429 (Comments: 1) | Adam Lanza (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - sock puppet & vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168671455 commented 2025-07-08 23:37:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 168669223 (Comments: 1) | Adam Lanza (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - sock puppet & vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168671455 commented 2025-07-08 23:37:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 168669254 (Comments: 1) | Adam Lanza (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - sock puppet & vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168671455 commented 2025-07-08 23:37:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134 |
| 166325436 (Comments: 2) | acidyellow (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo! Danke für den Hinweis. Da ist noch ein Schild an der Straßenecke. Am Gebäude selbst ist aber nichts zu sehen. Ich habe den Eintrag jetzt entfernt. commented 2025-07-08 22:56:33 UTC by acidyellow ♦1 |
| 162677542 (Comments: 1) | sgalaxya71silver (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hello Your action in correcting the name of this park is almost correct. After all, you should have created the name in the whole relationship and deleted the previous name. The full name of this park is Shohadaye karkhanasan park. سلام... commented 2025-07-08 22:44:01 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦418 |
| 168669693 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. (168669536, 168669632, 168669693) commented 2025-07-08 22:41:08 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168669632 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. (168669536, 168669632, 168669693) commented 2025-07-08 22:41:03 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168669536 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. Most recent changesets have been fully reverted. (168669536, 168669632, 168669693) commented 2025-07-08 22:40:56 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168668887 (Comments: 1) | democat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks much better now. Thank you for the edit. commented 2025-07-08 22:35:25 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦636 |
| 167956676 (Comments: 8) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Agreed on operator, thanks for merging these! I noticed the `frequency` tag didn't transfer, all DCFC stations such as superchargers are `frequency=0` to distinguish them from AC stations, `frequency=60` in the USA. commented 2025-07-08 21:30:39 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦23 |
| 149773937 (Comments: 6) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 109) | > Tussenpunten op rechte wegen zijn onnodige punten. Dat klopt wel, en het is inderdaad niet nuttig om te veel punten te zetten. Maar in dit geval hier zijn de punten toch wel echt een meerwaarde op hoge zoomniveaus, dus ik heb deze ... commented 2025-07-08 21:23:10 UTC by M!dgard ♦784 |
| 168627615 (Comments: 1) | DwightTee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi DwightTee, thanks for your contributions! I've reviewed your edits and for the most part they look good. A couple of suggestions: - The "name" tag should be used only for the actual name of the trail, and not as a description. Th... commented 2025-07-08 21:13:57 UTC by jake-low ♦11 |
| 168625858 (Comments: 1) | DwightTee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi DwightTee, thanks for improving the map of this campground! I reviewed your edits and they look good. One suggestion: in the future, instead of using the "name" field to describe the type of building (in this case a barn), you can use th... commented 2025-07-08 21:09:40 UTC by jake-low ♦11 |
| 168579579 (Comments: 4) | gigi2037 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Capito se guardi quando dai il nome alla fermata ce quel tag che ti chiede quale linea si ferma li possono essere più di uno ciao commented 2025-07-08 21:09:05 UTC by gigi2037 ♦19 |
| 145434547 (Comments: 2) | augil (Discussed changesets: 16) | hello, the main crop planted in these fields usually are, 98% of the time, hay. this hay gets replaced with short, lawn-grass during spring time and if i remember correctly, the term "meadow" can also refer to farmlands who grow grass &... commented 2025-07-08 20:36:43 UTC by augil ♦21 |
 | 165092245 (Comments: 2) | MaestroKissaki (Discussed changesets: 5) | Saludos, uso JOSM y mapas normalmente Mapbox, Bing. JOSM agrega automáticamente la fuente del mapa que uso. (disculpa lo tardío de la respuesta commented 2025-07-08 20:36:10 UTC by MaestroKissaki ♦5 |
| 168622471 (Comments: 3) | Luisma_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Cómo se determina? conociendo el lugar supongo. En las fotos satelitales se notan cuando son de asfalto o de concreto, pero no siempre, y ante la duda usamos "paved", que es el genérico. Ahora, si efectivamente ha... commented 2025-07-08 20:22:58 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,358 |
| 168666775 (Comments: 1) | Designli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-08 20:18:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168517656 (Comments: 3) | ArchaicRoster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je confirme que tout va bien désormais. Merci ! commented 2025-07-08 20:09:00 UTC by StC ♦254 |
| 168666048 (Comments: 1) | Lejun (Discussed changesets: 73) | #UnmappedSmallTownCA commented 2025-07-08 20:08:38 UTC by Lejun ♦482 |
| 168664100 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 117) | Ta linia nie ma numeru/oznaczenia. Zapis "Oznaczenie linii komunikacyjnej: U" oznacza, że jest to kurs użyteczności publicznej. Tak jest np. w PKS Grójec, że wszystkie dofinansowywane linie mają taki zapis, a ewentualny numer je... commented 2025-07-08 20:01:28 UTC by Konrad95 ♦6 |
| 168069918 (Comments: 1) | Philippe9517 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour Philippe9517, Pourquoi avoir supprimer les trottoirs que j'avais ajouté ? Ce n'est pas le seul changeset où tu as effacé des trottoirs. commented 2025-07-08 19:49:20 UTC by yargil ♦7 |
| 168661087 (Comments: 2) | WWMapper101 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Of course, thank you for your comment and thanks for fixing it. Will keep this in mind now when I'll do some more commented 2025-07-08 19:35:50 UTC by WWMapper101 ♦31 |
| 168638789 (Comments: 1) | SaritahLuisa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hier habe ich ebenfalls etwas rückgängig gemacht, alle Änderungen an der Bahnstrecke Ulm-Wendlingen. commented 2025-07-08 19:25:58 UTC by FroschForscher ♦56 |
| 168638367 (Comments: 1) | SaritahLuisa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo SaritahLuisa willkommen bei OSM, du hast hier beim Verschieben der Karte versehentlich einen Bordstein samt zugehörigem Weg verschoben und mit einem Stück Grass verklebt. Das habe ich rückgängig gemacht. iD sol... commented 2025-07-08 19:23:42 UTC by FroschForscher ♦56 |
| 168645349 (Comments: 1) | db-ak (Discussed changesets: 32) | tak na prawdę, to tam tak winno być niby... ale MIR nigdy nie umiał w oznakowanie i jest miszmasz ;] Trochę zmianiłem i dodałem niewidome wypustki na wypadek gdyby wpadła jednokreskowa siła uderzeniowa ;] commented 2025-07-08 19:08:10 UTC by Yog Sot ♦238 |
| 168621906 (Comments: 1) | 7n4xbe0e (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi :) es sieht so aus, als wären dies die Gärbehälter einer Biogasanlage: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Ddigester Grüße --- Published usin... commented 2025-07-08 18:55:17 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168583154 (Comments: 2) | charl3s (Discussed changesets: 176) | He made a mistake due to fatigue. He's corrected it now. Thank you for your attention. commented 2025-07-08 18:54:10 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦465 |
| 168481120 (Comments: 3) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 85) | Hey Map47, Thanks for the links. It would be nice to integrate that kind of information directly into OSM. I don't always check OSMI afterwards. I can imagine that there are more fun things for other mappers than checking areas and things of ... commented 2025-07-08 18:51:20 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦10 |
| 168657191 (Comments: 4) | TheTreeofPasts (Discussed changesets: 16) | > два тротуара с одной стороны дороги, получается? странно как-то. Согласен, те что ближе к дому нужно перетегать в дорожки, поправлю commented 2025-07-08 18:49:54 UTC by TheTreeofPasts ♦5 |
| 168663265 (Comments: 1) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 235) | Source: https://www.gelderlander.nl/bronckhorst/prorail-sluit-onbewaakte-overweg-ruurlo-waar-paar-maanden-geleden-nog-een-busje-werd-gehalveerd~ac992b2b/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fsomda.nl%2F commented 2025-07-08 18:38:49 UTC by dvdhoven ♦921 |
| 168623844 (Comments: 1) | 7n4xbe0e (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Meine Meinung: Wenn du dir mit den Brücken und Durchlässen sicher bist sieht das gut aus :) cheers --- ... commented 2025-07-08 18:36:49 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,417 |
| 168343923 (Comments: 1) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 20) | Cześć, DDPiR nie rozdzielamy na dwie linie jeśli nie są fizycznie rozdzielone. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery Czemu ma służyć ta restrykcja - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19309252? commented 2025-07-08 18:21:36 UTC by stasiu512 ♦163 |
| 165820199 (Comments: 2) | Peter Bremer (Discussed changesets: 15) | Dit betreft onder andere https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383644563 commented 2025-07-08 18:17:35 UTC by BAGgeraar ♦57 |
| 168662543 (Comments: 1) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 235) | Commentaar moet zijn: Kruising Raadhuisweg/Burgemerdaam/Lageweg/Mr. lang verhaal is een rotonde geworden commented 2025-07-08 18:17:08 UTC by dvdhoven ♦921 |
| 168589966 (Comments: 8) | mylokalesuche (Discussed changesets: 4) | Vielen Dank für das Feedback. Ich habe die Eintragungen rückgängig gemacht. commented 2025-07-08 18:15:56 UTC by limes11 ♦892 |
| 168602898 (Comments: 2) | Philip Newton (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! WIP is "work in progress". I was building the outside of the multipolygon for the forest step by step. But I can't save a line without tags, so I tagged it as a WIP. I've now completed the outer line and removed the ... commented 2025-07-08 18:13:39 UTC by Philip Newton ♦1 |
| 70509437 (Comments: 1) | Noam (Moovit) (Discussed changesets: 4) | I was wondering why you added access=foot but not bicycle, for instance. There is no way to get there without trespassing. RI114 just upstream of this section has access=no all but motor vehicles. I think this section should also be off limit for p... commented 2025-07-08 18:04:33 UTC by aduxas ♦32 |
| 168572379 (Comments: 1) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 258) | Warum wurde der Sportpark Oberhafen geändert? commented 2025-07-08 17:29:58 UTC by Inanias ♦2 |
| 168621607 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:29:45 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168621866 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:29:39 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168651735 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:29:31 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168651875 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:29:26 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168652361 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:29:17 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168652410 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:29:10 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168652537 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:28:49 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168652635 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:28:43 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168652750 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:28:37 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 168652838 (Comments: 1) | FU eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Vandalism Account. All changesets have been fully reverted. (168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607) commented 2025-07-08 17:28:20 UTC by eerib ♦177 |
| 145221226 (Comments: 1) | K_Sakanoshita (Discussed changesets: 5) | hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4845115 ? commented 2025-07-08 17:19:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 145204360 (Comments: 1) | iminorin (Discussed changesets: 1) | hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4845115 ? commented 2025-07-08 17:19:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 158769039 (Comments: 1) | Aphaia_JP (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12313875404/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-07-08 17:18:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168357368 (Comments: 5) | Trail_Caretaker (Discussed changesets: 34) | I'd have to ask again on in the server if third-party signage is enough verification for a trail name. I don't see why it wouldn't count, in this case, if they are more permanent installations rather chalk writing on rocks or the like.... commented 2025-07-08 17:17:17 UTC by Joseph R P ♦353 |
| 168655367 (Comments: 1) | Thaigonmendes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thaigonmendes, Percebi que você tem insistido em reclassificar estas vias como tertiary. Por que na sua concepção elas deveriam ser tertiary? Tertiary são para vias coletoras, dentro de localidades com mais de... commented 2025-07-08 17:10:34 UTC by santamariense ♦821 |
| 136407876 (Comments: 1) | DiogoBaptista98 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Olá Diogo! O "STT Student Hall" será na verdade "CTT Student Hall"? Alguns mapas identificam o telhado desse edifício como um local de eventos chamado "CTT Rooftop". commented 2025-07-08 17:09:21 UTC by dmfr ♦54 |
| 167879584 (Comments: 4) | Numac (Discussed changesets: 28) | Zoom all the way in to this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=12937737794 And you'll see that there is an incursion into the area defined as "rough". commented 2025-07-08 16:59:37 UTC by b-jazz ♦663 |
| 168656428 (Comments: 1) | Lodahl Family (Discussed changesets: 2) | HI, thanks for your edits. Please don't add names to private homes, though. Thanks! commented 2025-07-08 16:54:27 UTC by Omnific ♦205 |
| 167361110 (Comments: 2) | Dren ar Frankig (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you, I will keep this in mind. commented 2025-07-08 16:49:11 UTC by Dren ar Frankig ♦9 |
| 168630426 (Comments: 1) | enumclaw_utility_biker (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, please be a bit more careful. You accidentally turned an entire major road into a bike rack. commented 2025-07-08 16:45:39 UTC by Omnific ♦205 |
| 168627910 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 44) | Okay, I'll revert this, too. commented 2025-07-08 16:44:25 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦51 |
| 168634565 (Comments: 1) | enumclaw_utility_biker (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, please don't stack roads. Use the cycleway tags to indicate what kind of cycleway is on the road: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway. Let me know if you have questions! commented 2025-07-08 16:43:28 UTC by Omnific ♦205 |
| 168584782 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 44) | I noticed a bit too late... I'll manually check every road route relation in the county and remove the duplicates. commented 2025-07-08 16:43:24 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦51 |
| 168463266 (Comments: 2) | jumbanho (Discussed changesets: 17) | My pleasure, I'm slowly trying to add all the sidewalks to St. Paul. commented 2025-07-08 16:42:05 UTC by jumbanho ♦148 |
| 127260324 (Comments: 2) | Alan Bragg (Discussed changesets: 85) | name dropped, nevermind commented 2025-07-08 16:33:32 UTC by gdt ♦39 |
| 156835437 (Comments: 4) | RubenKelevra (Discussed changesets: 61) | Deinen Vorwurf, ich sei nicht vor Ort gewesen, weise ich zurück. Ich habe die Änderungen genau deshalb vorgenommen, weil ich mir vor Ort ein detailliertes Bild gemacht und die aktuelle Beschilderung geprüft habe. Solche Unterstellungen... commented 2025-07-08 16:12:05 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦59 |
| 168556152 (Comments: 3) | Peter Plandol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hab's mal angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168657890 commented 2025-07-08 16:10:35 UTC by FroschForscher ♦56 |
| 167163031 (Comments: 1) | mf2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Du hast hier einige Gebäude vorschnell als fertig gebaut gemappt. Die Bauphase ist beendet wenn alle Gewerke beendet sind, also das Gebäude bezugsfertig ist. Das kannst du daran erkennen, dass die ersten Möbelwagen vor der Tür ste... commented 2025-07-08 16:08:22 UTC by Berlin53 ♦62 |
| 24815272 (Comments: 4) | mkbdc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Już poprawione, chłopaku. Sprawdź, zanim skomentujesz. commented 2025-07-08 16:06:29 UTC by YomanNH ♦309 |
| 168603910 (Comments: 3) | chart2006 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your private message and for confirming that the deletions were intentional. However, the fact that a path or way is not public does not necessarily justify its deletion. In OpenStreetMap, we use access tags to indicate whether a... commented 2025-07-08 16:03:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168657470 (Comments: 2) | adejot (Discussed changesets: 12) | Poprawione. commented 2025-07-08 16:03:24 UTC by adejot ♦9 |
| 168619104 (Comments: 3) | f0restr1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional. However, your changeset has been reverted, as mentioned above. commented 2025-07-08 15:52:59 UTC by NeisReview ♦940 |
| 168622190 (Comments: 2) | NSchwarz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo NSchwarz, du hast den Radweg zu einem Gehweg mit "Radverkehr frei" korrigiert. Ich hab noch ein paar weitere Korrekturen vorgenommen 1) Das gilt auch auf der Brücke. 2) Dieser Weg ist somit kein Radweg sondern e... commented 2025-07-08 15:38:55 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,315 |
| 168610980 (Comments: 1) | Dfarr (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413051513 The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect (partially overlap) each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feat... commented 2025-07-08 15:24:56 UTC by b-jazz ♦663 |
| 168655129 (Comments: 1) | HS Rawal (Discussed changesets: 7) | ok commented 2025-07-08 15:24:08 UTC by DeepaR ♦7 |
| 157234139 (Comments: 1) | てさお (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12207990301/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-07-08 15:23:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168549171 (Comments: 1) | piksel169 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej, już raz zwracałem się do Ciebie pod zestawem zmian z informacją, że w OpenStreetMap nie skracamy nazw ulic. Dla przypomnienia: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic Nawet gdyby zmiana b... commented 2025-07-08 15:22:19 UTC by Fan map 2 ♦5 |
| 168655166 (Comments: 1) | HS Rawal (Discussed changesets: 7) | ok commented 2025-07-08 15:07:20 UTC by DeepaR ♦7 |
 | 168585968 (Comments: 1) | Erchad LERY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/129223718. What is the mean of the tags copieur = Toshiba eni speechi = 2 tni - defectueux = 2 Please notice we use british English for the keys. Don't add any private ... commented 2025-07-08 15:01:12 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 164055631 (Comments: 1) | LUIS ÊNIO (Discussed changesets: 5) | LUIS ÊNIO, Percebi uma prática sua indo na contramão das convenções adotadas no OSM. Só deve ser duplicada a geometria de uma via, com uma geometria em cada sentido se, e apenas se, houver barreira f&ia... commented 2025-07-08 15:00:40 UTC by santamariense ♦821 |
| 168641761 (Comments: 1) | Arifabee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Part of Jalan topas raya commented 2025-07-08 14:46:49 UTC by Silvlvia ♦1 |
| 159627692 (Comments: 4) | Alexandros Georgiou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Τώρα πρόσεξα ότι ένα ρολόι δαπέδου στις εκβολές τ&eta... commented 2025-07-08 14:37:11 UTC by jimkats ♦71 |
| 168536007 (Comments: 1) | OneNKode (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kedves OneNKode! Üdvözöllek az OSM közösségben! A "javítás" megjegyzéssel ellátott szerkesztésed első ránézésre rombolásnak tűnik. Az &ea... commented 2025-07-08 14:36:29 UTC by feket ♦36 |
| 167853378 (Comments: 7) | Kurtii (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Und nicht vergessen für welche Aktivität die Wegemarkierung ist: hiking=yes commented 2025-07-08 14:33:13 UTC by DeFra85 ♦236 |
| 168538554 (Comments: 2) | Gattatina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao ho guardato con StreetSide e si vede una colonnina gialla sul marciapiede con il DAE, ho aggiornato di conseguenza Ciao J. commented 2025-07-08 14:31:06 UTC by Jacopo ♦29 |
| 34673400 (Comments: 1) | Zain Ahmad Hashmi (Discussed changesets: 30) | Vandalising OSM by adding entirely fictitious and legally implausible weight restrictions does not "improve" anything. commented 2025-07-08 14:14:52 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,478 |
| 168616891 (Comments: 1) | smokyjo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I revert your change set. The standard key for every path, footway, service street, road, street is *highway* ! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org for a better description of your type of streets! commented 2025-07-08 14:04:08 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,410 |
| 168539707 (Comments: 1) | Icefreak (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm not sure this is accurate. The US Postal Service generally requires private letterboxes to be adjacent to the road in rural areas, and this looks like the dead center of a pasture. Could you please clarify what is going on here? ... commented 2025-07-08 13:56:43 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,117 |
| 34673202 (Comments: 1) | Zain Ahmad Hashmi (Discussed changesets: 30) | Liar. commented 2025-07-08 13:50:04 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,478 |
| 168610467 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 43) | FWIW, technically the source should include "Mapillary Traffic Signs" because I took the precise location from there (via Osmose) after checking it was consistent with the approximate location from my survey. commented 2025-07-08 13:39:15 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦53 |
| 117652384 (Comments: 3) | 30A (Discussed changesets: 3) | grazie, ciao commented 2025-07-08 13:28:39 UTC by civ41 ♦5 |
| 61641011 (Comments: 2) | Skybunny (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hey there. I can't find a/the source for why I changed it. (I grant this was 7 years ago.) What I DID find was yeah, your source, Pierce county GIS, that says Kitson. I'm going to change this one back. commented 2025-07-08 13:10:22 UTC by Skybunny ♦20 |
| 167840514 (Comments: 5) | ynx (Discussed changesets: 22) | хотите сказать, что их бетоном сверху залили? commented 2025-07-08 13:01:20 UTC by 4004 ♦1,888 |
| 168645201 (Comments: 1) | Rank Audits (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If your business is only on the 3rd floor of Nena House, it would be better to add it as either a node (point), with the additional tags level=3 and addr:floor=3rd Floor. As it stands, you have overwritten tags... commented 2025-07-08 13:00:48 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,478 |
| 168637956 (Comments: 1) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 34) | +1 commented 2025-07-08 12:56:15 UTC by theDM ♦91 |
| 168184769 (Comments: 2) | Przemek_Bo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi jpennycook. My sources do not explicitly specify the construction status of Whitehill Lane - way 1410049365 and way 1410049366. So as per your suggestion, I've restored the construction status of those ways in this changeset (https://www.o... commented 2025-07-08 12:55:50 UTC by Przemek_Bo ♦2 |
| 166004855 (Comments: 5) | ExoticApple57 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, Merci Charles pour ton retour, j’avais tenté très rapidement mais je l’avais trouvé assez complexe, je réessaierai à l’occasion. Bonne journée, commented 2025-07-08 12:49:33 UTC by ExoticApple57 ♦5 |
| 127241890 (Comments: 1) | Jenseblume (Discussed changesets: 48) | wo kommt der wenig signifikante Name "Höhe" her?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10086764080 commented 2025-07-08 12:45:47 UTC by kuhni74 ♦363 |
 | 168139985 (Comments: 1) | rackee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping . A remark. When you map a waterway/road to the edge of a task that continues further on an adjacent task, please map the track a bit over the edge of the task. Another mapper on the adjacent task will see it and can con... commented 2025-07-08 12:38:21 UTC by Frans S ♦9,821 |
| 168443900 (Comments: 3) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 94) | in vijf minuten! knap! commented 2025-07-08 12:18:03 UTC by threeof4 ♦11 |
| 168551124 (Comments: 1) | Kubostrel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! In Latvia streets only have names where the cadastre specifies them. This one should have no name (noname=yes tag), which I added. commented 2025-07-08 12:12:33 UTC by Pilsetkartetajs ♦10 |
| 168084716 (Comments: 4) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 12) | With pleasure. It’s usually the trafic signs that indicate whether a street is classified as a pedestrian zone or not. In Paris, there are very few errors in the OSM database regarding this type of classification. Benoît commented 2025-07-08 12:06:05 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦180 |
| 142602396 (Comments: 1) | kenhara (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11263811588/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-07-08 11:50:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 166252660 (Comments: 1) | Alt9800 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12836765959/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-07-08 11:47:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168465123 (Comments: 1) | angys (Discussed changesets: 102) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12976050211/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-07-08 11:47:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 165611883 (Comments: 2) | JassKurn (Discussed changesets: 47) | Yes, and you've reminded me that I've got to update it. Water started flowing into the quarry to the east, and land to west was washed into quarry. At time I mapped it the area was flooded but receding, so didn't add water. The... commented 2025-07-08 11:37:43 UTC by JassKurn ♦154 |
| 168058289 (Comments: 6) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 24) | For the F thing, for example in iD: - create a new object - click a node on an existing node of a nearby way (the tool now which line you want to follow) - click on a consecutive point of that way (now it know in what direction to follow) |
| 168639928 (Comments: 1) | JhayP_tattoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola JhayP_tatoo, Has añadido de manera incorrecta una web sobre tatuajes en un parque. ¿Tienes un negocio de tatuajes y quieres añadirlo? Si nos explicas en qu´lugar concreto está, podremos añadirlo de... commented 2025-07-08 11:25:10 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,628 |
| 168644608 (Comments: 1) | A_Ku (Discussed changesets: 62) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12987503318 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-07-08 11:20:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦6,980 |
| 167801045 (Comments: 2) | Zrop (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hallo stadt-koeln-rutha, weil der tag für das markieren von inoffizielle Namen von Straßen/Wegen vorgesehen ist. Dieser Weg hat aber keinen Namen. Gruß Zrop commented 2025-07-08 11:19:36 UTC by Zrop ♦73 |
| X | 168543214 (Comments: 2) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay unos 6000 nodos, de ellos 2342 duplicados, sin etiquetas y sin formar parte de vias In this changeset there are about 6000 nodes, of which 2342 are duplicates, without labels and not part of ways. ---<... commented 2025-07-08 11:17:35 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 168601959 (Comments: 1) | avary07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please DO NOT change again Strada Tabacari. DJ104D not come into that roudabout. It conntinues forward. The part that comes into that roundabpout is a limited acces street. Thank you. commented 2025-07-08 11:09:55 UTC by rarad74 ♦278 |
| 147498567 (Comments: 2) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 161) | 't is ook niet mijn gewente om een fietspomp pal in het midden van de weg te zetten, meestal zet ik ze mbv luchtfoto's exact juist... Vreemd, geen idee wat er hier is gebeurd. Ik heb de POI verwijderd commented 2025-07-08 10:52:04 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦445 |
| 168620030 (Comments: 2) | VLD292 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Can you link to the MapRoulette Challenge you were using? Is the challenge telling you to remove directional traffic signals for pedestrian? commented 2025-07-08 10:49:10 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦354 |
| 168005981 (Comments: 2) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 593) | Na jakiej podstawie twierdzisz, że ograniczenia foot i vehicle są takie same? commented 2025-07-08 10:43:46 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,272 |
| 168620370 (Comments: 1) | VLD292 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please keep traffic signals on pedestrian crossings and cycleway crossings. It makes it possible to add penalties in OSRM and other routing engines. Almost all intersections with traffic signals in the Montreal area that have been updated have them. ... commented 2025-07-08 10:43:10 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦354 |
| 168005667 (Comments: 2) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 593) | commercial nie stosuje się tylko dla firm komercyjnych, jego definicja została jakiś czas temu znacznie rozszerzona. commented 2025-07-08 10:42:53 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,272 |
| 168005780 (Comments: 2) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 593) | Czy wiesz, gdzie przyjmują interesantów? Z moich odwiedzin wynikało, że właśnie w tym budynku. Ale jeśli w każdym, to przywrócę tagowanie jak było poprzednio. commented 2025-07-08 10:41:45 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,272 |
| 168628095 (Comments: 2) | LukeyBear (Discussed changesets: 5) | Die kaputte geometrie wurde hier bereits behoben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168640851 commented 2025-07-08 10:38:27 UTC by 0xb7767000 ♦12 |
| 168642661 (Comments: 1) | redroselandscaping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-08 10:31:08 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168642284 (Comments: 1) | balkonbewohner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich versuche das gleich mal zu reverten; hier sollten eigentlich nur Änderungen von Birgel drin sein. commented 2025-07-08 10:24:26 UTC by balkonbewohner ♦2 |
| 168587662 (Comments: 3) | Andre Hahnenberg (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung. Ich beziehe mich auf zwei Punkte: Zum einen wäre es schön, wenn du die Hydranten und die Straßen “entkleben” könntest. Zum anderen steht noch die Frage i... commented 2025-07-08 10:19:34 UTC by rempshaener ♦731 |
| 168642039 (Comments: 1) | Dr Katarzyna Parkot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-07-08 10:15:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168517830 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay 44 edificios de unos 60 centimetros, formados cada uno por 312 nodos muchos de ellos duplicados. This changeset contains 44 buildings, each approximately 60 centimeters in diameter, each consisting of 312 nodes, many... commented 2025-07-08 10:07:52 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 168518330 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay 4 edificios de unos 60 centimetros, formados cada uno por 60 nodos This changeset contains 4 buildings, each approximately 60 centimeters in diameter, each consisting of 60 nodes --- #R... commented 2025-07-08 10:04:58 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 168580297 (Comments: 1) | félix06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Félix, merci pour ta contribution, mais je ne suis pas certain qu'il soit judicieux de tracer 2 ways séparés se chevauchant. On reste dans le cas d'une bande cyclable sur trottoir, donc highway=footway + footway... commented 2025-07-08 10:02:35 UTC by patadune ♦5 |
| 168519075 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay 26 edificios de unos 60 centimetros, formados cada uno por 312 nodos muchos de ellos duplicados. This changeset contains 26 buildings, each approximately 60 centimeters in diameter, each consisting of 312 nodes, many... commented 2025-07-08 09:59:57 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 168638977 (Comments: 2) | Ahrdie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Tux67, guter Punkt, ich war letztes Jahr hier und da haben wir auf dem rechten Teil der unteren Wiese auch Zelte stehen gehabt. Wahrscheinlich müsste man die Rasenfläche in eine westliche und eine östliche aufteilen. Ich meine d... commented 2025-07-08 09:53:27 UTC by Ahrdie ♦3 |
| 168561097 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay 35 edificios de unos 60 centimetros, formados cada uno por 377 nodos muchos de ellos duplicados. Se ha mapeado un area como landuse=farmland que no parece corresponder a dicha etiqueta This changeset contains 35 b... commented 2025-07-08 09:52:09 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 168564682 (Comments: 1) | DomDombes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Erreur sur le tag ref:FR:SIRET. Corrigé. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168564682 commented 2025-07-08 09:49:39 UTC by lmagreault ♦171 |
| 168563899 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay 10 edificios de unos 60 centimetros, formados cada uno por 377 nodos muchos de ellos duplicados. This changeset includes 10 buildings, each about 60 centimeters tall, each consisting of 377 nodes, many of them dupli... commented 2025-07-08 09:40:57 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 168561811 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay 10 edificios de unos 60 centimetros, formados cada uno por mas de 180 nodos muchos de ellos duplicados. Tambien se ha mapeado landuse=forest que no se corresponde con ningún límite This changeset includ... commented 2025-07-08 09:39:23 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 167977219 (Comments: 4) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 87) | Dzięki, za weryfikację w terenie! commented 2025-07-08 09:36:51 UTC by stasiu512 ♦163 |
| 147987113 (Comments: 5) | Dalfsenaartje (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bij Camping Ommerland is een pumptrack. Ik zie op hun website dat ze zelf ook het woord pumptrackbaan gebruiken, maar een track is natuurlijk al een baan - het is dubbelop. Ik zou 'baan' weglaten. Het verdient trouwens aanbeveling in alle m... commented 2025-07-08 09:30:42 UTC by Op'tRad ♦33 |
| 167937857 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Hallo osm-pt-account, Du hast den Routen-Typ auf "bus" umgestellt. Wir haben es hier aber mit einem "Anruf-Sammel-Taxi"(AST) zu tun, das mit "share_taxi" getaggt wird. Das ursprüngliche Tagging war schon ... commented 2025-07-08 09:25:41 UTC by marcoSt ♦118 |
| 166107962 (Comments: 3) | Dasc3er (Discussed changesets: 2) | so fixme and fixme:type can be now simply removed, right? commented 2025-07-08 09:21:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 168637807 (Comments: 2) | UNIGLOB_KB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Poprawny adres tej lokalizacji to Ozorkowska 8. Pracuję tutaj :). Ogólnie to na ten ulicy adresy są pomieszane cześć budynków należy do "Tymianki" a część do "Strykowa" commented 2025-07-08 09:20:08 UTC by Drakon79 ♦1 |
| 168563341 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay 23 edificios de unos 60 centimetros, formados cada uno por 377 nodos muchos de ellos duplicados In this set of changes there are 23 buildings of about 60 centimeters, each formed by 377 nodes, many of them duplicated... commented 2025-07-08 09:13:38 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 168561591 (Comments: 1) | Michaellcassian (Discussed changesets: 17) | En este set de cambios hay 39 edificios de unos 60 centimetros, formados cada uno por 377 nodos muchos de ellos duplicados In this set of changes there are 39 buildings of about 60 centimeters, each formed by 377 nodes, many of them duplicated... commented 2025-07-08 09:10:01 UTC by Puxan ♦184 |
| 168564465 (Comments: 3) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 290) | W zasadzie to limit jest uzgodniony na 5 km a nie 5000 m – a po zaokrągleniu do pełnych km by się łapało ;)) commented 2025-07-08 09:06:34 UTC by dzamper ♦112 |
| 168624382 (Comments: 1) | Giulia Siemoni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. E Benvenuta nella mappa più bella del mondo! Ti ringrazio per avere iniziato a contribuire. Ma devo chiederti se sei sicura di alcune modifiche che hai fatto: 1) in tre relazioni hai sostituito source=survey:CAI con |
| 168637944 (Comments: 1) | ouchdinw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for drawing new cycle tracks—which we will assume have been built very recently. Please try to spend some time learning how to edit OSM properly before engaging in massive redrawings of infrastructure. I am afraid you are doing i... commented 2025-07-08 08:49:10 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 168637386 (Comments: 1) | ouchdinw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Thanks and welcome to OSM. We have two questions about this: 1. You claim that the one-way street was introduced in 2022. On this picture taken in July 2024, there is no indication about one-way signs here: https://www... commented 2025-07-08 08:45:26 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 168637291 (Comments: 1) | YuliyaSurta (Discussed changesets: 51) | Also changed road class. commented 2025-07-08 08:29:58 UTC by YuliyaSurta ♦51 |
| 168610874 (Comments: 2) | fmc_9 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ok danke, hab cycleway:right:source:width & cycleway:right:traffic_sigh=none ergänzt. Die anderen Sachen sollten vielleicht erst wenn es aktuelle Mapillary Bilder für den ganzen Abschnitt gibt, eingetragen werden. commented 2025-07-08 08:19:22 UTC by fmc_9 ♦1 |
| 168636907 (Comments: 1) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 54) | typo: chadd->check commented 2025-07-08 08:19:20 UTC by lyctkel ♦335 |
| 168578013 (Comments: 1) | Magnolia bar&beach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thanks for adding the place. But image you've provided is placed on yoy private Google Drive and it isn't available for public. I deleted it. commented 2025-07-08 08:01:58 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦119 |
| X | 168396583 (Comments: 4) | mylokalesuche (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for pointing this out and for reverting the changeset – much appreciated. You're right, this changeset was the result of a test that unintentionally pushed invalid data to (0,0). That was not our intention, and we apologiz... commented 2025-07-08 07:44:06 UTC by mylokalesuche ♦2 |
| 168569563 (Comments: 1) | Blauer Pfeil (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, nur zur Info: in diesem Changeset hast du die Gemeinde Grenze von Grindelwald irgendwie und sicherlich unabsichtlich kaputt gemacht. Ist in der Zwischenzeit behoben, also auch keine Aktion deinerseits erforderlich. commented 2025-07-08 07:31:14 UTC by SimonPoole ♦341 |
| 168485397 (Comments: 5) | TeamDELKO (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merci Syl. Normalement j'ai effectué des recherches "DELKO + nomville" des garages fermés et il n'y avait que ces 4 là. J'abuse peut être mais je tente : j'ai créé un sujet... commented 2025-07-08 07:30:13 UTC by TeamDELKO ♦6 |
| 168485264 (Comments: 4) | TeamDELKO (Discussed changesets: 6) | Génial ! commented 2025-07-08 07:28:01 UTC by TeamDELKO ♦6 |
| 168433299 (Comments: 4) | TeamDELKO (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok ça marche, merci. commented 2025-07-08 07:27:49 UTC by TeamDELKO ♦6 |
| 168433438 (Comments: 4) | TeamDELKO (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merci Syl ! commented 2025-07-08 07:27:18 UTC by TeamDELKO ♦6 |
| 148849802 (Comments: 2) | moonraver (Discussed changesets: 31) | zdravim,dal som ju prec,zavora tam uplne postacuje commented 2025-07-08 07:10:21 UTC by moonraver ♦38 |
| 168612846 (Comments: 1) | Laetitia Grussu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert, "Beschriftung" entfernt. Hallo Laetitia, Willkommen bei OSM. Das Projekt ist keine Marketing-Plattform für Immobileienentwicklung. Wenn AVENTOS spezielle Karten für ein Exposé benötigt, dann verwe... commented 2025-07-08 06:56:50 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,288 |
| 168559686 (Comments: 1) | DylaniaCat (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks for your edits - here are some hot tips on adding phone numbers ( )'s and leading zeroes in area codes are not required. I have just updated some recent edits. commented 2025-07-08 06:42:36 UTC by tastrax ♦1,147 |
| 168632446 (Comments: 1) | Yakobi (Discussed changesets: 19) | Я откатил ваши правки, потому что вы снова сдивнули дом по нерпавильно привязанному снимку. Сейчас буду просить вас забанить. I've rev... commented 2025-07-08 06:31:48 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦119 |
| 167997847 (Comments: 8) | GR-menneke (Discussed changesets: 33) | En bedankt om er nog eens langs te fietsen ;-) commented 2025-07-08 06:26:22 UTC by GR-menneke ♦25 |
| 168277523 (Comments: 1) | Komet (Discussed changesets: 14) | Quelle zwar unpassend wg. CC BY-ND, aber Punkte wurden bereits oder werden noch diese Woche von Komet vor Ort überprüft. commented 2025-07-08 06:22:25 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,288 |
| 168254592 (Comments: 1) | Komet (Discussed changesets: 14) | Revert nach Rücksprache mit Komet wg. unpassender Lizenz CC BY-ND commented 2025-07-08 06:19:39 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,288 |
| 168259162 (Comments: 1) | Komet (Discussed changesets: 14) | Revert nach Rücksprache mit Komet wg. unpassender Lizenz CC BY-ND commented 2025-07-08 06:18:53 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,288 |
| 168632595 (Comments: 1) | Majd ALMASRI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Majd ALMASRI, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment fie... commented 2025-07-08 06:16:28 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,322 |
| 168553907 (Comments: 3) | GHC411 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Now updated Wiki page to correct name. commented 2025-07-08 06:00:13 UTC by GHC411 ♦1 |
| 168626306 (Comments: 1) | AUTTP (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168631991 commented 2025-07-08 05:49:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168626285 (Comments: 1) | AUTTP (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168631991 commented 2025-07-08 05:49:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168626232 (Comments: 1) | AUTTP (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168631991 commented 2025-07-08 05:49:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168626031 (Comments: 1) | AUTTP (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168631991 commented 2025-07-08 05:49:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168626004 (Comments: 1) | AUTTP (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168631991 commented 2025-07-08 05:49:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168626277 (Comments: 1) | AUTTP (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168631991 commented 2025-07-08 05:49:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,011 |
| 168628362 (Comments: 1) | Bustycat (Discussed changesets: 11) | 不太算完全錯誤，而是歷史遺跡，以前因為程式關係，會標示oneway=-1，但漸漸被棄用 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168628362 commented 2025-07-08 05:47:34 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,446 |
| 168597922 (Comments: 2) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 92) | 👍 commented 2025-07-08 05:37:17 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦78 |
| 157185179 (Comments: 4) | gszkr (Discussed changesets: 26) | czyli https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10923638605/history jest do skasowania? commented 2025-07-08 05:26:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 |
| 165372488 (Comments: 1) | HPG_64 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ein derartig großes Scrub Gebiet über im Wesentlichen Autobahnen zu legen macht keinen Sinn, insbesondere da schon Teilgebiete detaillierter gemappt sind. Bitte aufspalten oder löschen! commented 2025-07-08 04:51:10 UTC by fx99 ♦127 |
| 168630351 (Comments: 1) | selillium (Discussed changesets: 24) | Source is Bing/extrap Oopsie-woopsies. commented 2025-07-08 04:34:11 UTC by selillium ♦24 |
| 168466506 (Comments: 2) | LopDesert1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Animeee__, Thank you for your input. I will defer to your knowledge that it is a footway. commented 2025-07-08 04:21:55 UTC by LopDesert1 ♦2 |
| 168628814 (Comments: 2) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 85) | No worries. commented 2025-07-08 03:34:18 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 167455937 (Comments: 2) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 11) | ok commented 2025-07-08 03:23:23 UTC by w_djatmiko ♦5 |
| 168292444 (Comments: 4) | Rachel2010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7373994785 is not T2 that was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6552009371 I've reverted that change. commented 2025-07-08 02:47:38 UTC by aharvey ♦1,734 |
| 168599178 (Comments: 1) | hoanganhlami33 (Discussed changesets: 39) | theo mình đọc thì maxweightrating:hgv mới dc sử dụng đúng wiki hơn là maxweight:hgv commented 2025-07-08 02:21:41 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦232 |
| 159828124 (Comments: 6) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 38) | Likewise, there is no way to read the minds of the "OSM community" when the docs are fragmented and at times at odds with themselves. 7 years ago I brought in the data a few blocks at a time, hardly a mass import. And only for my own small ... commented 2025-07-08 01:51:42 UTC by chef bama ♦10 |
| 168329674 (Comments: 3) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thank you. commented 2025-07-08 01:47:05 UTC by VictorIE ♦911 |
| 166895005 (Comments: 2) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi Xeff, thank you for your comment. I accidentally deleted one way too many. Thanks a lot for reverting it! I'll be more careful next time. commented 2025-07-08 01:29:24 UTC by wildmaps ♦42 |
| X | 168576603 (Comments: 8) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thank you for providing the details on what caused the issue! :) We all make mistakes, and that's okay. Happy mapping! commented 2025-07-08 01:14:10 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦102 |
| 168524617 (Comments: 4) | Le_Sharkoïste (Discussed changesets: 31) | I would've if people like you stopped moaning about big changeset bboxes commented 2025-07-08 00:58:15 UTC by Le_Sharkoïste ♦64 |
| 158787612 (Comments: 1) | quattrobergman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what's your source of info for this bridge? Last I checked it was pedestrian only. Are vehicles under 3 tons now permitted? commented 2025-07-08 00:54:22 UTC by jmapb ♦405 |
| 155215192 (Comments: 2) | Anonymous897234 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Well, the city is being physically recreated, starting next week. To the larger question of why keep it on the map the rest of the year? Few reasons (just my opinion): It's easier than recreating from scratch; folks like to look at it the... commented 2025-07-08 00:45:30 UTC by Anonymous897234 ♦7 |
| 168568594 (Comments: 2) | Mzaki (Discussed changesets: 8) | thanks commented 2025-07-08 00:41:35 UTC by Mzaki ♦2 |
| 168581253 (Comments: 1) | prullmw (Discussed changesets: 3) | You can change the road east of the fence to highway=path or highway=track. A path is for people while a track is typically used by farm vehicles. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... commented 2025-07-08 00:05:50 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168581071 (Comments: 2) | prullmw (Discussed changesets: 3) | BTW street side imagery just says private driveway, no exit. Can you review this edit? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168581071 commented 2025-07-08 00:04:35 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168581033 (Comments: 1) | prullmw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Private usually means that the local government does not own or maintain the road. For that you can add the tag ownership=private. If the road has a no trespassing sign then the access=private is appropriate. --- ... commented 2025-07-08 00:02:23 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168619892 (Comments: 1) | Columbiawebb (Discussed changesets: 2) | If they have been closed and unlikely to come back, you can just delete the business. If the address was added, leave it since it will likely be reused. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... commented 2025-07-07 23:59:53 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 168565623 (Comments: 1) | Columbiawebb (Discussed changesets: 2) | When tagging a closed business, I just add opening_hours=closed --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168565623 commented 2025-07-07 23:58:29 UTC by Glassman ♦5,240 |
| 138271816 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 241) | Ahoj, priechod node 9968249527 (a ine) nema ostrovcek, opravil som. commented 2025-07-07 23:42:48 UTC by Tomas_J ♦288 |
| 168589398 (Comments: 1) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 24) | Various edits in different areas – large changeset due to forgetting to enable automatic new changesets in JOSM commented 2025-07-07 23:40:15 UTC by wildmaps ♦42 |
| 108312822 (Comments: 1) | Rado209 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ahoj, vseobecne popisne nazvy (knizna budka) nepatria do name. commented 2025-07-07 23:37:56 UTC by Tomas_J ♦288 |
| 164424505 (Comments: 2) | AdamLanzaTheAprilFoolsVideoEditor3903HD (Discussed changesets: 7) | Nice commented 2025-07-07 23:23:56 UTC by AUTTP ♦2 |
| 164426089 (Comments: 2) | AdamLanzaTheAprilFoolsVideoEditor3903HD (Discussed changesets: 7) | Nice commented 2025-07-07 23:23:45 UTC by AUTTP ♦2 |
| 168609794 (Comments: 1) | Fod (Discussed changesets: 19) | Please save your changes more frequently and avoid making such large changeset areas. Thank you commented 2025-07-07 23:04:32 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦57 |