| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 171559127 (Comments: 2) | ElPiraTAUP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah, disculpa, lo agrupar lo hiciste muy bien. Gracias! commented 2025-09-15 05:29:57 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,900 |
 | 66282676 (Comments: 4) | Digne (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb voor de zuiverheid alleen de data elementen die 100% niet waar zijn weggehaald. Met in de object aanpassings verklaring een verzoek tot nader onderzoek commented 2025-09-15 05:29:51 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦40 |
 | 171885646 (Comments: 2) | GUFSZ (Discussed changesets: 39) | Wenn Du mir genauer verrätst welche, dann ja. commented 2025-09-15 05:27:20 UTC by GUFSZ ♦164 |
 | 128287825 (Comments: 1) | Aprelevka Boy (Discussed changesets: 10) | Здравствуйте. У вас регулярно повторяющаяся ошибочка. В name были внесены названия улиц, без слова улица. Например name=Луговая, вместо name=Лу... commented 2025-09-15 05:24:35 UTC by solenoid jam ♦179 |
 | 171832094 (Comments: 2) | GBURPro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aux personnes concernées, Nous vous contactons en notre qualité de représentants légaux de BNP Paribas S.A (ci-après " BNP Paribas "). Notre équipe de sécurité nous a inform&... commented 2025-09-15 05:23:18 UTC by GBURPro ♦1 |
 | 171945516 (Comments: 1) | theortegafirm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-09-15 05:21:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171843924 (Comments: 4) | SpeedMcCool (Discussed changesets: 9) | UnusualWorld, I am seeing this for the first time, and it is clear from this comment that you do not understand what tag I was adding. Please, revert your reversion and I will do my best to ensure future changesets do not span large areas (which, as ... commented 2025-09-15 04:50:33 UTC by SpeedMcCool ♦15 |
| 171855452 (Comments: 4) | UnusualWorld (Discussed changesets: 6) | The tag being updated was not "wikidata" but rather "name:etymology:wikidata". Therefore, the linked entity should be the namesake of the feature rather than the feature itself. The only example you gave of incorrect data was &quo... commented 2025-09-15 04:12:04 UTC by Gabe DeFreitas ♦8 |
| 171914652 (Comments: 7) | Protoxenus (Discussed changesets: 129) | Auch ich schließe mich silversurfer83 an. :-) commented 2025-09-15 04:09:49 UTC by pitfire ♦680 |
| 171944070 (Comments: 1) | Ryan Watern (Discussed changesets: 15) | Not sure how "for bridge" got added lol but its tags for the construction site. commented 2025-09-15 04:07:10 UTC by Ryan Watern ♦7 |
 | 171943845 (Comments: 1) | Fernada Guaman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fernada Guaman, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment f... commented 2025-09-15 03:56:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
 | 167635853 (Comments: 3) | binmo (Discussed changesets: 1) | It would be sensible to merge them and include the covered=yes just to mention that there is shelter in that area. Agree it would be efficient merge. commented 2025-09-15 03:29:25 UTC by binmo ♦1 |
| 171913749 (Comments: 1) | Jannoying (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, You have deleted the tags that described a power pole here. Can you review this as a power pole appears in imagery. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171913749 commented 2025-09-15 03:03:55 UTC by nevw ♦2,022 |
| 171913320 (Comments: 1) | Jannoying (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, you have attached an overhead cable to a road hump here. Let me know if you are unable to fix. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171913320 commented 2025-09-15 03:00:17 UTC by nevw ♦2,022 |
| 171908687 (Comments: 1) | Jannoying (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, you seem to have dragged some nodes here. Let me know if you are unable to fix. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171908687 commented 2025-09-15 02:55:32 UTC by nevw ♦2,022 |
 | 171898656 (Comments: 2) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry, my mistake. commented 2025-09-15 02:37:21 UTC by nvh12 ♦1 |
 | 171942243 (Comments: 2) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18733 commented 2025-09-15 02:22:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171942228 (Comments: 1) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338 commented 2025-09-15 02:18:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171942193 (Comments: 1) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338 commented 2025-09-15 02:18:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171942171 (Comments: 1) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338 commented 2025-09-15 02:18:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171942093 (Comments: 1) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338 commented 2025-09-15 02:18:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171942112 (Comments: 1) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338 commented 2025-09-15 02:18:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
 | 171942127 (Comments: 1) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338 commented 2025-09-15 02:18:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171942151 (Comments: 1) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338 commented 2025-09-15 02:18:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
 | 171838419 (Comments: 2) | shortcut6108 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Well noted. Thanks for pointing this out. I've updated few ref for pitches in the Stanley Ho sports centre. Please take a look if these complies with the naming scheme. commented 2025-09-15 02:03:04 UTC by shortcut6108 ♦1 |
| X | 171926926 (Comments: 3) | cnvery (Discussed changesets: 34) | 您好： 是否能够至少切割为三个或四个编辑变动让其他编辑看得时候能轻易审核？如此大的变辑变动会吓到其他人，而的确吓到人 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2025-09-15 01:54:08 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,480 |
| X | 171855852 (Comments: 4) | GISLOUIE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ive removed the NAMRIA based boundaries. I'll also reach out to the LGU to see if they can share their boundary data so we can add it back properly commented 2025-09-15 00:58:03 UTC by GISLOUIE ♦1 |
 | 171940085 (Comments: 1) | MarksPL (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-15 00:46:33 UTC by stasiu512 ♦175 |
| 171940435 (Comments: 1) | alicew02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Alice, the vast majority of footprints here represent buildings, though most of the circular footprints actually represent vegetation i.e. bushes and trees, due to their colour. Zooming in and out tends to aid imagery interpretation. The NW... commented 2025-09-15 00:35:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 166124886 (Comments: 1) | ZenPhil (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi, was ref=TQ 3133 8823 actually signed on this substation? I removed it because I thought it was incorrect to have a grid reference set as the ref, but there seems to be several substations tagged like this in London and Southend, so if it was wron... commented 2025-09-15 00:28:36 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦87 |
 | 171899799 (Comments: 2) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 177) | por otro lado como sabes que ahora el 25 va por necochea azopardo hasta brasil? commented 2025-09-15 00:28:20 UTC by i2004 ♦141 |
| 171938673 (Comments: 1) | RedLily (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you mapped this footprint based on only one half of a pitched roof and did not appropriately square the footprint. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_... commented 2025-09-15 00:15:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171906766 (Comments: 1) | no details provided here (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429686756 really a building? It does not look like one on bing and others. commented 2025-09-15 00:02:48 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦801 |
| 171752992 (Comments: 1) | aspoon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cycle lanes that are part of the road should be mapped using the cycleway=lane tag, not mapped as separate cycleways disconnected from the road. Additionally, shared use paths should replace any existing sidewalks/footways, not be mapped separate fro... commented 2025-09-15 00:01:16 UTC by jake_penguins ♦7 |
| 147223485 (Comments: 4) | NTAshridgeEstatePaths (Discussed changesets: 6) | @NTAshridgeEstatePaths Please do reply to these changeset comments. When I submit this comment you will get sent an email you will get sent a link to this changeset. Click through that and you can comment yourself (write a comment in the box and cl... commented 2025-09-14 23:55:41 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 171907379 (Comments: 1) | Arktorus (Discussed changesets: 14) | This is generally a high quality contribution. There are some minor inaccuracies here and there, but on the whole it looks like you took care to accurately map the buildings here. You updated the river to match the imagery. Please consider th... commented 2025-09-14 23:49:29 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 148160630 (Comments: 3) | NTAshridgeEstatePaths (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, You've deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1215964867 (see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2bEM ) here. Although it's in the trees, it is still somewhat visible in imagery, so if you want to prevent anyone re-adding it I strong... commented 2025-09-14 23:47:35 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
 | 171856563 (Comments: 2) | Zarrink (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! The tag is needed on ways for the overlay that displays railway operators on OpenRailwayMap. commented 2025-09-14 23:45:10 UTC by Zarrink ♦2 |
 | 171456433 (Comments: 1) | kiwi75 (Discussed changesets: 7) | kiwi75, not all of the numbers from the Register of National Roads (1998) are used in practice, such as the ΕΟ102 and ΕΟ111. Such numbers belong to "ref:esye"=*. I know I got to update the documentation at ht... commented 2025-09-14 23:41:26 UTC by ika-chan! ♦278 |
| 171412997 (Comments: 3) | NTAshridgeEstatePaths (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, You'd deleted the tracks / footpaths here and I've restored them, because your deletion may cause someone to re-add it from imagery (where it is clearly visible), and if they do that they will not add access tags. I have added ... commented 2025-09-14 23:38:10 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 167225787 (Comments: 3) | NTAshridgeEstatePaths (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, You'd deleted the private track here (which was tagged as a private track). I've restored the private track because your deletion may cause someone to re-add it from imagery (where it is clearly visible), and if they do that they... commented 2025-09-14 23:33:22 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 167225932 (Comments: 3) | NTAshridgeEstatePaths (Discussed changesets: 6) | Like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171412889 this also deleted a public right of way. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#17/51.77428/-0.53272/H/P shows that. If it genuinely has been rerouted or closed by the local authori... commented 2025-09-14 23:30:29 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 171412889 (Comments: 4) | NTAshridgeEstatePaths (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello NTAshridgeEstatePaths, As some people have already said, you'd deleted a number of public rights of way. The one here can be seen at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#16/51.8328/-0.6079/O/P (the green overlays on that map ... commented 2025-09-14 23:26:30 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 171938814 (Comments: 1) | epoillac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hab den Namen falsch erinnert: Das Gebiet heißt tatsächlich "Kläne Esch". commented 2025-09-14 23:11:29 UTC by epoillac ♦1 |
| 171933904 (Comments: 1) | Oscar Felipe Hoyos Carvajal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you generally identified buildings visible in imagery and correctly tagged and squared the vast majority of them, however some are not as accurate as the imagery allows e.g. the footprints in the North, and a significant ammount share common node... commented 2025-09-14 23:03:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171856357 (Comments: 1) | une abeille (Discussed changesets: 25) | 😃😃🚲🚲🎉🎉🎉 commented 2025-09-14 22:58:34 UTC by chinook17 ♦31 |
 | 171924846 (Comments: 1) | Ariz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Ariz, gracias por colaborar en mejorar los datos de OpenStreetMap. No sé a qué mapas te refieres con esa confusión de localidades. En OSM está correcto y no es necesario poner la dirección a las calles, pues... commented 2025-09-14 22:41:52 UTC by MarinoBM ♦103 |
 | 171855820 (Comments: 9) | RLakhani (Discussed changesets: 23) | Again when you accuse people of lying or decieving, you are doing nothing to solve the issue, but make it worse. I have asked you to come to PM, you have not messaged. This is a town. Youc an argue about its classification but you are being ob... commented 2025-09-14 22:41:38 UTC by Jacksonville ♦17 |
| 171409267 (Comments: 4) | The Vyne (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello "The Vyne", and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I wonder if there's been a bit of a miscommunication about "permissive access" here? Something that the general public have a legal right to access (e.g. a public footpath) ... commented 2025-09-14 22:34:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
 | 171774732 (Comments: 1) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 98) | Sobre esta edição peço que verifique o grupo OSM pt no Discord. Atenciosamente commented 2025-09-14 22:34:21 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦200 |
 | 171923624 (Comments: 2) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 79) | Sveiciens! Ok, vairs nelīmēšu. commented 2025-09-14 22:14:49 UTC by Anrijs Terauds ♦48 |
| 171830737 (Comments: 2) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 79) | Sveiks, klientu centrs ir pārcēlies uz jauno māju pāri ielai. commented 2025-09-14 22:12:46 UTC by Anrijs Terauds ♦48 |
 | 170749485 (Comments: 1) | Js7h (Discussed changesets: 5) | Verlauf gefixt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171938220#map=12/47.1647/15.6669) commented 2025-09-14 22:11:28 UTC by Js7h ♦4 |
| 171562549 (Comments: 14) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hmm, my bad I also forgot to apply the mechanical=yes tag to this edit. I will also include this in future comments. But due to the description and size of the changeset (and the lack of source=survey) I thought it would be obvious. Also the OTG w... commented 2025-09-14 21:44:42 UTC by wombatmaper ♦76 |
| 171938035 (Comments: 1) | JulesGabrielVerne (Discussed changesets: 92) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429820183 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-09-14 21:41:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171928519 (Comments: 2) | Josepvc (Discussed changesets: 32) | Además, no es cierto la página web https://www.retocima.es/cas15.htm afirme que este punto se llame "Coll de Santa Águeda". Sencillamente es una descripción de una subida ciclista que llega a un punto cercano a l... commented 2025-09-14 21:39:26 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,682 |
 | 171894834 (Comments: 2) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 118) | It is corrected commented 2025-09-14 21:35:56 UTC by Eebie ♦135 |
| 171936770 (Comments: 1) | tekvet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! The vast majority of footprints you mapped here represent buildings; I think that two do not. They could be more accurate, and all buildings I saw in the imagery likely had square footprints. Consider that you are looking at the roofs... commented 2025-09-14 21:25:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171884651 (Comments: 3) | Rodrigo Rega (Discussed changesets: 29) | Perfecto, sendo así logo está claro, non tiña nin idea de que dous castros puidesen estar tan preto, pero si. Saúdos. commented 2025-09-14 21:15:41 UTC by Monchinho ♦65 |
| 166028259 (Comments: 5) | JakubRogalski (Discussed changesets: 1) | @JakubRogalski Dotarłem tutaj poprawiając pasy startowe w Polsce. To jest w sumie ostatni przypadek, który został :) Ogólnie to `aeroway=runway` nie powinno być tagowane jako obszar, a linia, gdzie w tym przypadku ... commented 2025-09-14 21:12:42 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 170289577 (Comments: 6) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 225) | Thanks a lot for the photograph! commented 2025-09-14 21:09:35 UTC by cdavila ♦27 |
 | 171934625 (Comments: 4) | Myazyk (Discussed changesets: 254) | так це не району назва, а назва ларьків commented 2025-09-14 21:01:44 UTC by kamasytrix ♦36 |
| 171932190 (Comments: 5) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Oke... dan geen roundabout.. commented 2025-09-14 20:54:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171935451 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | All footprints you mapped here represent buildings. You improved the accuracy of an existing footprint; well done. When appropriate, please remember to square footprints after moving their nodes. Thank you for your contribution. Resolved by; C... commented 2025-09-14 20:48:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171918362 (Comments: 3) | janhals (Discussed changesets: 24) | Oke... echt duidelijk is het niet.. Maar met pedestrian zal het in ieder geval niet routeren voor parkeerplaatszoekers in osm. Up to you als local mapper. commented 2025-09-14 20:47:20 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171891861 (Comments: 4) | vp21 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Czemu nie może być? Na Wiki nie ma nic napisane o tym, że musi być taki sam znak jak stosuje GDDKiA. W dodatku jest napisane, że znacznik ten może się znaleźć również na drogach trunk czy primary commented 2025-09-14 20:38:33 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦738 |
 | 169977269 (Comments: 3) | felipeacsi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Felipe, no noté este comentario, recién lo veo... Gracias por la observación. siempre trato de cuadrarlas. A veces lo hacía al final de una edición y quizás quedaron sin cuadrar. Ahora trato de ir cua... commented 2025-09-14 20:37:14 UTC by felipeacsi ♦1 |
 | 171902512 (Comments: 1) | Roxy5958 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Lütfen 171785407 ID'li değişiklik setinize yapmış olduğum yorumu okuyun. +90 kısmını kaldırmayın https://osm.org/changeset/171785407 Tekrar düzenledim: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171935948 commented 2025-09-14 20:31:58 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171935662 (Comments: 1) | Patryk Piotrowski (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-09-14 20:30:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
 | 171776771 (Comments: 2) | StefDeGreef (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thank you for reminder ! commented 2025-09-14 20:28:04 UTC by StefDeGreef ♦11 |
| 171803434 (Comments: 1) | Shuuk Ollie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for contributing. Try not to delete roads/paths/buildings that still exist on the ground. Instead change access and other tags and other tags to prevent routing through them. It's a common mistake. I have resolved the is... commented 2025-09-14 20:26:53 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦81 |
| 171934087 (Comments: 1) | kenVaiphei (Discussed changesets: 3) | Good job modifying the exisitng footprints here rather than deleting and remapping. You may want to map footprints slightly smaller than the roof you see to give yourself a buffer for the change in shape that occurs during squaring. Thank you for you... commented 2025-09-14 20:25:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171934350 (Comments: 1) | biketeur (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo biketeur, auch hier hast Du wieder Gebäude von “building=terrace” in “building=house” umgetaggt. Einige der Gebäude sind aber keine Einfamilienhäuser sondern Mehrfamilienhäuser. Was ist Deine Qu... commented 2025-09-14 20:23:07 UTC by Zrop ♦83 |
| 171923678 (Comments: 3) | UncNeon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cevabınız için teşekkür ederim. commented 2025-09-14 20:19:20 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
 | 168466442 (Comments: 1) | wsmmga (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. I am very concerned about what you are doing. You are changing official Spanish names to English names. The official language of all Colombian territory is the Spanish language. commented 2025-09-14 20:15:15 UTC by afgb1977 ♦24 |
| 171933687 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, you appropriately moved the highway to prevent data overlaps and make the relative position of features more accurate. The vast majority of footprints here represent individual footprints, but two in the South with complex shapes envelope... commented 2025-09-14 20:13:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171701833 (Comments: 1) | chriz_osm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo chriz_osm, vielen Dank für das Lösen des Rätsels von T-AB-680. Diese Bezeichnung spukte bereits vor einigen Jahren durch die Datenbank, siehe die Versionshistorie von AB-L-2114. Das Zusammenlegen der beiden Punkte mag zwar... commented 2025-09-14 20:11:59 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,324 |
| 171934600 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Skop (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycz... commented 2025-09-14 20:01:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171934701 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse2 (Discussed changesets: 61) | Yes it has! commented 2025-09-14 19:56:55 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦460 |
| 167678867 (Comments: 4) | Anthérop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oui effectivement après quelques recherches, il semble que les les L11 et L19 passent par cet arrêt. Je pense que la suppression était une erreur. On pourra faire un revert du revert ! ;) On est OK pour remettre l'arrêt... commented 2025-09-14 19:53:24 UTC by schabanel ♦15 |
| 171932949 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, this is overall a good cahngeset, but the arrow head shaped building in the NW is likely just a rectangular building and just looks that way becasue the imagery was taken at an angle. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical... commented 2025-09-14 19:52:16 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171904279 (Comments: 1) | Richardt59 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The name of the node seems to point to a legal requirement to protect eagles but not a specific area. See https://www.fws.gov/law/bald-and-golden-eagle-protection-act Can you review this edit to determine if the node should be in OSM? We only ... commented 2025-09-14 19:46:17 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171932989 (Comments: 1) | E11497 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag E... Lijkt me correct zo. Mapse commented 2025-09-14 19:46:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171933732 (Comments: 1) | E11497 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hoi, Je vraagt feedback.. Wanneer een naam niet officieel is uitgegeven, maar wel wordt gebruikt door de 'lokalen' dan kun je beter loc_name=...... taggen. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-14 19:43:05 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
 | 171914896 (Comments: 4) | Martin Ligabue (Discussed changesets: 23) | per ogni posto prima mi guardo informazioni su facebook, siti web e altro che trovo, il feed facebook mi sembrava non troppo male, e la città coincideva, quindi l'ho dato per buono. per overkids come avevo detto l'avevo confuso con u... commented 2025-09-14 19:42:49 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦30 |
| 171931479 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, you are generally identifying buildings. A few of the buildings you mapped are almost as accurate as the imagery allows. Consider that you are looking at the roofs of buildings which likely overhang the walls somewhat. You created invalid shared ... commented 2025-09-14 19:40:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171514142 (Comments: 2) | Meinreal (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171934103 commented 2025-09-14 19:39:16 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171933693 (Comments: 1) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hoi .. Lijkt me oke als dat C12 bord aan beide kanten staat. bicycle en foot=yes is default op wegen, maar kwaad kan het natuurlijk niet. Die forward en backward zal ergens vandaan komen. Inconsistente bebording. Het waren tags uit 2023 ... commented 2025-09-14 19:38:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 170537847 (Comments: 1) | Meinreal (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171934079 commented 2025-09-14 19:38:27 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 170366448 (Comments: 1) | Meinreal (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171933950 commented 2025-09-14 19:34:59 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 170366378 (Comments: 1) | Meinreal (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171933921 commented 2025-09-14 19:33:53 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171930370 (Comments: 6) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Ik kijk even.... moment commented 2025-09-14 19:31:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 170366321 (Comments: 1) | Meinreal (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171933836 commented 2025-09-14 19:31:17 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
 | 171547494 (Comments: 4) | sampeto (Discussed changesets: 3) | As fas as I know it even starts at Flüelen (Allmendstrasse, Reussstrasse, Industriestrasse) and then WOV in the direction of Klausenpass or Umfahrungsstrasse in the direction of Erstfeld. But there are construction sites on every corner at t... commented 2025-09-14 19:29:41 UTC by sampeto ♦34 |
| 171666723 (Comments: 1) | Oler4 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich habe folgende kleine Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen: - Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor... commented 2025-09-14 19:28:55 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 169786969 (Comments: 2) | StC (Discussed changesets: 23) | Bonjour, l'itinéraire jacquaire entre Sarreguemines et Hérapel apparaît toujours dans Waymarkedtrails. Sur quellle carte a-t-il disparu ? commented 2025-09-14 19:27:17 UTC by StC ♦324 |
| 171916811 (Comments: 1) | gfsbk (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo gfsbk, du hast hier foot=yes eingetragen. im Tag "note" steht aber "nur Langlaufloipe, im Sommer als (gesperrter) Trampelpfad deutlich erkennbar" --- Published using OSMCha: http... commented 2025-09-14 19:21:33 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,374 |
| 171048077 (Comments: 1) | Dornbacher (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, bitte vorsichtig sein mit Korrekturen von alten Orthofotos. Der Verlauf von An der oberen Alten Donau war von mir schon an den neuen Baufortschritt angepasst. commented 2025-09-14 19:21:19 UTC by evod ♦96 |
| 171930102 (Comments: 1) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Resolved by https://osmcha.org/changesets/171933411 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171930102 commented 2025-09-14 19:20:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171930543 (Comments: 3) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | See how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171933411 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from o... commented 2025-09-14 19:19:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171472318 (Comments: 5) | JigAma (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ça marche. À ma connaissance, il est convenu sur OSM de laisser les noms tant qu’ils sont visibles sur le bâtiment (car ça permet de se repérer év... commented 2025-09-14 19:17:51 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦11 |
 | 171736917 (Comments: 1) | Zsolti-kun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Ezt visszavontam mert teljesen össze vissza tologattad a határral együtt az utcákat. Dorog/Esztergom határa az aktuális szabályozási terv alapján van most megrajzolva. Ha ... commented 2025-09-14 19:11:41 UTC by vasony ♦524 |
| 171929843 (Comments: 1) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, in a couple of places you created shared nodes between buildings that share nodes: hold alt to prevent the creation of shared nodes. Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or resident... commented 2025-09-14 19:05:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171891969 (Comments: 1) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lieber User Openminded320, willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Du bist nun einige Tage aktiv, und alle deine Änderungssätze sind mit "Update" beschriftet. Das ist für den Rest der Community nicht sehr hilfreich, da n... commented 2025-09-14 18:57:58 UTC by Polarbear ♦943 |
 | 171845657 (Comments: 2) | DoToDo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый вечер. Сотрудники открывающихся ПВЗ сообщают нам эти адреса, если на карте их еще нет, или они добавлены с ошибками. commented 2025-09-14 18:51:50 UTC by DoToDo ♦1 |
| 171922791 (Comments: 2) | Jejko02 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hej, Wczoraj otwarto nowy odcinek drogi wojewódzkiej DW 935, ale tylko na fragmencie od węzła Wodzisławska do ronda przy ul. Sportowej. Wspomniany przez Ciebie węzeł Grota-Roweckiego co prawda został już wybudowany, jednak wjazd ... commented 2025-09-14 18:50:57 UTC by Jejko02 ♦1 |
 | 171849467 (Comments: 1) | amanmisc12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice, thanks for updating this area commented 2025-09-14 18:47:51 UTC by PlaneMad ♦451 |
 | 169499466 (Comments: 12) | drutten84 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kul att du vill rätta till det! Bra om du läser på. Om du har frågor och tror att jag kan hjälpa dig, så kontakta mig gärna. commented 2025-09-14 18:34:34 UTC by archie ♦1,335 |
 | 171930169 (Comments: 1) | Hansekogge48 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-09-14 18:29:38 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
| 171911575 (Comments: 2) | chinook17 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Je comprends! J'ai corrigé mon erreur. :) commented 2025-09-14 18:23:36 UTC by chinook17 ♦31 |
| 171870712 (Comments: 3) | Toms K1600 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alles klar :) Steht da irgendwo ein Schild, dass der Schrein so heißt, wie du es eingetragen hast? Oder heißt die Linde so und der Name sollte an die Linde? Auf dem verlinkten Bild kann ich am Schrein leider keinen Namen erke... commented 2025-09-14 18:15:20 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 167753658 (Comments: 1) | CorinnaV (Discussed changesets: 1) | die strasse ist wieder befahrbar, hat nur eine kurze stelle mit einer fahrbahnverengung zwischen Roth und pruppach. https://www.bayerninfo.de/de/baustellenkalender?bounds=49.276094%2C11.073101%2C49.271561%2C11.088727&datetimeFrom=2025-08-3... commented 2025-09-14 18:11:09 UTC by JohnDoe435968 ♦1 |
| 171562971 (Comments: 3) | NGL-engel (Discussed changesets: 94) | Danke für deine sorgfältige Überprüfung! Da war einiges durcheinander, auch auf den zahlreichen Websites dazu und der Beschilderung vor Ort offenbar. Die Namen, wie du sie gesetzt hast stimmen, und der Rest jetzt auch. Grü... commented 2025-09-14 17:58:55 UTC by ChillyDL ♦101 |
| 171930550 (Comments: 1) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 116) | source=survey commented 2025-09-14 17:55:28 UTC by Piagno ♦97 |
| 171900608 (Comments: 3) | Im Fokus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo, nur ein kurzer Hinweis noch zu TIM-online: Das ist für uns nur nachrangig von Interesse; es zählt letztlich, was vor Ort ausgewiesen ist. Danke und viele Grüße commented 2025-09-14 17:55:10 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
 | 171930441 (Comments: 1) | Kyzuda (Discussed changesets: 1) | ya ini dibutuhkan commented 2025-09-14 17:54:02 UTC by Kyzuda ♦1 |
 | 171923631 (Comments: 1) | nickkiho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Saludos, por favor NO agregues la etiqueta place=isolated_dwelling, para edificaciones cerca de vias. Si deseas agregar edificaciones de forma más rápida y precisa te sugiero que uses el editor Rapideditor,org solo para edificaciones. |
| 171329176 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 64) | Okay, I've since downgraded it (and portions of Hughes Park Drive) back to primary. Thanks! commented 2025-09-14 17:44:57 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦79 |
| 171918372 (Comments: 1) | Stefan378 (Discussed changesets: 2) | W tej edycji jest parę błędów. Na zrzutach ekranów https://postimg.cc/gallery/QCVW89J widać ich więcej w oknie sprawdzania poprawności ale to dlatego, że część jest fałszywa i czasem wynika z niepełnego pobrania obszaru oraz... commented 2025-09-14 17:41:58 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦525 |
| 171909100 (Comments: 1) | OFWimNorden (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Zu www.openstreetmap.org/node/13142279379: Das fire_hydrant:position=lane passt nur selten zu Überflurhydranten. Bis auf wenige Ausnahmen (Fußgängerzonen etc.... commented 2025-09-14 17:41:28 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 171751299 (Comments: 4) | Wilfried Jansky (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the eye-opening links. From now on I will write expressive descriptions. commented 2025-09-14 17:39:09 UTC by Wilfried Jansky ♦2 |
| 171909024 (Comments: 1) | OFWimNorden (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das Gebäude trägt jetzt den Namen „Heilpädagogische Kinder-und Jugendheime Rotenburg“. Was fehlt ist eine... commented 2025-09-14 17:30:32 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 171920199 (Comments: 2) | HopefulTrails (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there. If there isn’t a nearby place with similar features to copy tags from, I’ve used ChatGPT to suggest fitting ones. A service road with a ‘mine’ tag, suggested by ChatGPT, seemed reasonable at the time, as they are dis... commented 2025-09-14 17:23:08 UTC by HopefulTrails ♦1 |
| 171923380 (Comments: 2) | BartekGa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dokladnie, musiałem tapnąć w Vespuccim, już wywaliłem ;) commented 2025-09-14 17:09:47 UTC by BartekGa ♦6 |
| 171919535 (Comments: 4) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 159) | Dzięki za wskazanie. Poprawiłem Radom jak i pozostałe 47 z 48 w Polsce (ostatnie zostawiłem póki co do wyjaśnień, bo jest to nietypowe wodne). commented 2025-09-14 17:08:39 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 171922553 (Comments: 1) | isJambo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The pub is already mapped as an outline of the premises, Way: The Regal (1204234283). I've removed the POI as it's duplication of data. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-09-14 17:07:02 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
| 171909868 (Comments: 1) | Joanna_UPWR (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap nie służy do dodawania prywatnych notatek. commented 2025-09-14 17:03:36 UTC by maro21 ♦723 |
| 171927948 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 208) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4961687 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-09-14 18:53\tclosed\tok 4961688 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-09-14 18:53\tclosed\tok 4961689 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-09-14 18:53\tclosed\tok commented 2025-09-14 16:55:36 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,473 |
| 171927424 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 208) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4961674 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-09-14 18:42\tclosed\tok.. 4961681 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-09-14 18:42\tclosed\tok.. 4961675 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-09-14 18:42\tclosed\tok.. 4961682 (iD... commented 2025-09-14 16:51:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,473 |
| 171260425 (Comments: 2) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 98) | Rzeczywiście. Wygląda na to że szalona dodał ten tag razem ze zmianą kategorii stąd pojawił się problem. Nie będę w stanie poprawić w najbliższym czasie ale jak tylko znajdę chwilę (i nie zapomnę) to poprawię. commented 2025-09-14 16:30:49 UTC by Yunkers ♦390 |
| 171860041 (Comments: 4) | PoppaShell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah, good to know. And yes, that is unfortunate, as I also assume the permissible sources will be too dated to keep up with the adoption pace of Flock and other ALPR/surveillance cameras out there. But I will survey those permissible sources to check ... commented 2025-09-14 16:29:14 UTC by PoppaShell ♦1 |
| 171557178 (Comments: 1) | DodoGTA (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-09-14 16:28:19 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
 | 171754129 (Comments: 1) | chabe01 (Discussed changesets: 92) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-09-14 16:28:09 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
| 171849627 (Comments: 1) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-09-14 16:27:57 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
| X | 171869015 (Comments: 1) | astest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-09-14 16:27:20 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
| 171924898 (Comments: 1) | edihoo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-09-14 16:27:09 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
| 171531607 (Comments: 3) | James pand (Discussed changesets: 1) | yes i'll review it commented 2025-09-14 16:24:01 UTC by James pand ♦1 |
| 171922866 (Comments: 1) | E11497 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag E... Al die accesstags zijn default. Voor de hulpdiensten kan beter emergency=yes worden getagd ipv permit. Ik pas even wat aan. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard MVG eggie commented 2025-09-14 16:23:25 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171681913 (Comments: 3) | FahRadler (Discussed changesets: 71) | Thank you indeed! It is nice to agree :) commented 2025-09-14 16:23:14 UTC by Jan Olieslagers ♦208 |
| 171916215 (Comments: 1) | HVeeman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-14 16:19:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171913911 (Comments: 1) | 3ziei00b (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-14 16:18:45 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171884145 (Comments: 4) | BVBVB (Discussed changesets: 2) | 😀 commented 2025-09-14 16:08:27 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
 | 169837881 (Comments: 1) | FACUOS (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, Once again don't just keep pressing buttons inside StreetComplete if you are not sure of what you are doing commented 2025-09-14 16:08:15 UTC by Enock4seth ♦563 |
| 171925656 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 376) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes with https://www.osm.org/changeset/171925656. commented 2025-09-14 16:05:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 169884105 (Comments: 1) | FACUOS (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, I have reverted this changeset others. Do not upload data to OpenStreetMap if you don't know what you are doing. commented 2025-09-14 16:01:01 UTC by Enock4seth ♦563 |
| 171704277 (Comments: 1) | Colosseum Fan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merhaba. Yurt binasını ve yurdu tanımlamak için kullandığınız etiketlerin doğru olduğuna emin misiniz? Lütfen bir etiketi kullanmadan önce eklemek istediğiniz etiketin daha önceden başka bir adla kullanılıp kullan... commented 2025-09-14 16:00:16 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦83 |
| 171582849 (Comments: 1) | h4rdhelm3t (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen! FÖMI ortofotó az nagyon pontos, de 10 éves. Berajzoltál a Vizafogó parkban egy átlós gyalogutat, ami a frissebb Esri World-ön nem látszik, való... commented 2025-09-14 15:57:55 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 171155944 (Comments: 3) | Emil1887 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Die Fahrbahn bis zur Fertigstellung vollständig gesperrt. Die Fahrbahn ist also auch genauso da, wie sie nicht da ist ; ) Der Radweg wird mit der Asphaltierung hergestellt. commented 2025-09-14 15:57:29 UTC by Emil1887 ♦1 |
| 171924036 (Comments: 1) | datendelphin (Discussed changesets: 8) | Referenz für wie lange die Unterführung gesperrt bleibt: https://www.zentralplus.ch/news/diese-unterfuehrung-bleibt-bis-im-fruehling-gesperrt-2802333/ commented 2025-09-14 15:45:24 UTC by datendelphin ♦331 |
| 171660040 (Comments: 1) | FACUOS (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, welcome to OSM, unfortunately you kept deleting and adding tags that you don't seem to understand. If you are not sure of what you are doing don't upload to OpenStreetMap. Also pay attention to JOSM validation messages before hitting up... commented 2025-09-14 15:45:05 UTC by Enock4seth ♦563 |
 | 78415372 (Comments: 2) | Alazar-AddisMap (Discussed changesets: 4) | Awaiting for your update? I tried updating this Adwa Victory Memorial museum area but access tag and the unfinished bus route links on Eden Street and Cunningham Street prevented me from updating this area in accordance with Esri World Imagery... commented 2025-09-14 15:45:01 UTC by OSM_GEO_Validator ♦5 |
| 171704098 (Comments: 1) | Colosseum Fan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Başka bir değişikliğinizin(changeset/171605393) yorum kısmında bu konu size iletilmiş. Ancak yine de ada "BAİBÜ" kısaltmasını eklemişsiniz. Ayrıca ben de size özel mesajla adların kısaltılarak yazılmaması gerekti... commented 2025-09-14 15:43:24 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦83 |
| 171924507 (Comments: 1) | Nottingham Tree Surgeons (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-09-14 15:42:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 7772653 (Comments: 3) | GeorgFausB (Discussed changesets: 17) | Mich hatte nur das "1900" irritiert, 125 Jahre her, da war ja noch Kaiser ... Mit administrativen Grenzen mache ich sonst nichts und glaubte, dass es dafür Importe aus behördlichen Quellen gäbe. commented 2025-09-14 15:42:20 UTC by urk ♦12 |
| 171687860 (Comments: 1) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 171) | Hallo wermak, schau dir mal folgende Seiten an: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-VVS-Analysis.html#bus_578 https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-VVS-Analysis.html#bus_592 Laut Chronik hast du am 9.9.2025 an ... commented 2025-09-14 15:33:22 UTC by ghostrider44 ♦66 |
| 165928652 (Comments: 2) | teddyumd (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Yes, I am a local contributor. What questions do you have? In the last year or so, the government has changed a lot of the streets which also changed the public transportation systems. Zewditu St is a two way street, but public transportat... commented 2025-09-14 15:17:35 UTC by teddyumd ♦1 |
| 170934172 (Comments: 1) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. I don't see the part 'childcare' on the site, and it is in English. Should we map it though as the way you suggested? Thank you in advance! commented 2025-09-14 15:15:33 UTC by VLD549 ♦294 |
| 170547391 (Comments: 1) | kammah (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide some sort of link that shows it to be 100 jaar Kon. Zeil- en Roeivereniging Neptunus? Why the '100 jaar'? Is that the way it needs to be mapped? Shouldn't it just be Konin... commented 2025-09-14 15:12:56 UTC by VLD549 ♦294 |
 | 171849803 (Comments: 2) | rahal2022 (Discussed changesets: 7) | كما أؤكد بأن الحدود لا تغير بحسب رأي أو خبر بسيط وإنما حسب بيانات واضحة تبين مكان الحدود وأين تبدأ وتنتهي ! commented 2025-09-14 15:09:49 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦715 |
| 171922893 (Comments: 1) | CyberCatBlues (Discussed changesets: 1) | And by doing it right, I am replacing the nodes with actual building areas, so I wanted to make sure the addresses would still show up. So far, looks good. commented 2025-09-14 15:09:48 UTC by CyberCatBlues ♦1 |
 | 171563257 (Comments: 4) | B972025 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thank you for fixing it. 🙂 commented 2025-09-14 15:09:10 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦576 |
| 171913369 (Comments: 1) | OttoR (Discussed changesets: 67) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/261686624. What is the mean of the tag bgt_tags = wegdeel_vlak-rijbaan lokale weg---? commented 2025-09-14 15:03:55 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 36265108 (Comments: 1) | teddyumd (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Buddy, Do you have any source to support access=destination on Cunningham Street? as i didn't find any clue / update in news or Street-level imagery? The access tag and the unfinished bus route links on Eden Street and Cunningha... commented 2025-09-14 15:03:31 UTC by OSM_GEO_Validator ♦5 |
| 171899032 (Comments: 1) | xrosarinox (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hola. Al ser doble sentido de circulación, se debería añadir "oneway=no" para dejar en claro que esta vía ya se relevó, además de cumplir con el estandarizado local. Ya lo corregí. htt... commented 2025-09-14 15:01:59 UTC by mweper ♦420 |
| 171597678 (Comments: 1) | Hamalik (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2025-09-14 14:57:13 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,066 |
| 171577057 (Comments: 1) | ref60 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 У этой части здания вроде меньше пяти этажей commented 2025-09-14 14:53:50 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,066 |
| 171365073 (Comments: 2) | bolée (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear woodpeck, Apologies for the previous email. I inadvertently replied directly to the email notification instead of posting on the changeset group, as I did not realize that was the correct channel. Further to my last message, I was ... commented 2025-09-14 14:47:39 UTC by bolée ♦1 |
| 158726867 (Comments: 1) | melody_Tej (Discussed changesets: 15) | Questa modifica anziché rimuovere un errore precedente (l'allungamento della strada pubblica dentro l'azienda in corrispondenza delle strade interne aziendali) ha spostato l'allungamento in corrispondenza di un'altra strada... commented 2025-09-14 14:45:09 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦127 |
| 171920162 (Comments: 2) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 159) | Odpowiedź tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164481892 commented 2025-09-14 14:33:08 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 164481892 (Comments: 3) | Azbestcik (Discussed changesets: 181) | Odnośnie starej wieży, to nie wiem za bardzo o czym mówisz, ale jeśli się taka nawet gdzieś znajduje, to raczej kwestia zmapowania starej wieży, a nie drogi kołowania, czy pasa. Resztę wypłytowania pasów masz teraz inacz... commented 2025-09-14 14:31:32 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
 | 171920974 (Comments: 1) | PEN_CHO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi PEN_CHO, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 8 highway(s) - 1 building(s) - 1 natural(s) ... commented 2025-09-14 14:29:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171912840 (Comments: 5) | alessandrocarmeli (Discussed changesets: 137) | Si tranquillo so già tutto Per esempio il bar l’ho aggiunto da questo https://www.instagram.com/castelbarteana?igsh=eTQxZGZmajhyZDFo commented 2025-09-14 14:22:48 UTC by alessandrocarmeli ♦239 |
| 171920074 (Comments: 1) | Atrotters (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-09-14 14:20:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171820191 (Comments: 3) | neluj (Discussed changesets: 2) | La méthode est correcte. C'est le commentaire du changeset qui m'a surpris car il ne décrit pas la modification. Sinon c'est bon commented 2025-09-14 14:17:38 UTC by Gonéo ♦226 |
| 171841439 (Comments: 4) | kabantecno (Discussed changesets: 6) | Да можно. source=Bing проставлять не нужно. Еще можно уточнять какое конкретно здание например building=house но не обязательно building=yes более чем дос... commented 2025-09-14 14:16:40 UTC by s777n ♦281 |
| 171766574 (Comments: 2) | Im Fokus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo Andy, korrigiert ist das Ganze schon und ich war zudem der festen Überzeugung, auch eine Erläuterung an dieser Stelle hier hinterlassen zu haben, bis Kollege rempshaener eine Nachfrage zu den Adress-POIs stellte. Ich habe diese... commented 2025-09-14 14:15:24 UTC by Im Fokus ♦24 |
| 171450810 (Comments: 2) | GeraldineTaveirne (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, i have a picture but I didnt see where i could upload it. commented 2025-09-14 14:12:26 UTC by GIS_Melle ♦1 |
| 171633688 (Comments: 2) | wdgwdg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, You did not reply to this comment. But I found out that you made another changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171772522 intended as a fix. I made some additional fixes, it should be okay now. commented 2025-09-14 14:11:53 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,544 |
 | 171913931 (Comments: 4) | Amineee__ (Discussed changesets: 32) | Maybe take into account what I'm telling you, instead of replying "👍"? I told you many times: 1. Please don't map the roof of the buildings. Look at this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14297255... commented 2025-09-14 14:07:18 UTC by ilias_ ♦249 |
| 171888830 (Comments: 4) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | duplikat poprawiony, opis zmian też :) commented 2025-09-14 14:05:59 UTC by Barroszt ♦303 |
| 171872505 (Comments: 2) | Cyrille37 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Aya Samir, I changed to secondary because of: - it's "ref=RR607" that make it a secondary road as specified in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco/Roads#RR_Regional_roads - Roads network 2025 update as linke... commented 2025-09-14 14:00:52 UTC by Cyrille37 ♦49 |
| 170585068 (Comments: 1) | Azbestcik (Discussed changesets: 181) | Podtrzymywanie historii jest ważne. Podmieniamy geometrię istniejących bez usuwaniach ich, więc nie usuwaj obiektów, żeby je ponownie dodać, skoro to jedno kliknięcie w porządnym edytorze, żeby taką geometrię podmienić. Tago... commented 2025-09-14 14:00:05 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 171892605 (Comments: 2) | mdgm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Super, merci! commented 2025-09-14 13:46:47 UTC by mdgm ♦6 |
| 171726720 (Comments: 1) | Kovács Ervin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen! Frissen lebontott épületeket nem jó egyből törölni, ameddig nincs friss műholdkép, amin már látszik, hogy tényleg le lettek bontva. Jöhet ut&aac... commented 2025-09-14 13:42:03 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 171832658 (Comments: 2) | Piotr Strębski (Discussed changesets: 182) | poprawione! commented 2025-09-14 13:33:29 UTC by Piotr Strębski ♦180 |
| 171607431 (Comments: 2) | sportybobcat (Discussed changesets: 4) | Einfach ändern, fertig.. ps: es gibt genügend Objekte die definitiv grobe Fehler enthalten. Oder existiert bei ihnen die Wissenslücke, das Flachglas in Glasrecyclingcontainern verboten ist, da es die Charge unbrauchbar macht? |
| 171877497 (Comments: 7) | Mannivu (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ho provato ora usando https://brouter.damsy.net/latest/#map=17/45.50724/9.63699/standard e mi sembra funzioni correttamente commented 2025-09-14 13:22:23 UTC by Mannivu ♦241 |
| 171851674 (Comments: 1) | bzotyka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen! Az út törlése ilyen esetben nem jó megoldás, mert jöhet utánad valaki, aki visszarajzolja majd műholdképről. Ilyenkor az út magán rés... commented 2025-09-14 13:17:57 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 33113537 (Comments: 3) | wemken (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Holger, Danke für die Antwort, ich habe es erst einmal geändert, aber ich kläre es gerade im Zusammenarbeit mit ChillyDL noch einmal ab. Danke für die nette Rückmeldung, Gruß Angela commented 2025-09-14 12:38:52 UTC by NGL-engel ♦104 |
 | 171400861 (Comments: 6) | aziz2424 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Clarifying and rephrasing my previous comment: The Waze app show that the sections of road 60, that were deleted in this edit, are being used at this moment by multiple cars. I'd like to ask you to refrain from further editing rela... commented 2025-09-14 12:38:29 UTC by zstadler ♦1,069 |
| 171914659 (Comments: 2) | DomKor (Discussed changesets: 17) | fonte commented 2025-09-14 12:16:38 UTC by DomKor ♦13 |
 | 171864026 (Comments: 1) | Simoi@9000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/13140472126. What is the mean of the tags cột: = loa phát thanh công cộng type: = pole Please notice we use british English for the keys. I will remove the colon on t... commented 2025-09-14 12:10:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171913649 (Comments: 1) | Jannoying (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Jannoying, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field.... commented 2025-09-14 12:06:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171868557 (Comments: 1) | Binnette (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/5453794122. What is the difference between snorkeling = yes sport = snorkeling ? commented 2025-09-14 12:04:08 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171893179 (Comments: 3) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 18) | Beim anderen Platz gibt es die Zahl 40 die offensichtlich auch von der Webseite stammt und der Name deutet auch drauf hin dass das zwei Teile des selben Platzes sind. Wenn das so ist sollte man ein Multipolygon aus beiden Flächen machen und pass... commented 2025-09-14 11:48:32 UTC by giggls ♦108 |
 | 171878465 (Comments: 1) | شومینه لوکس ایران (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please use english keys for your business. And notice your business is n't part of the street. commented 2025-09-14 11:23:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171911279 (Comments: 1) | Netmaper (Discussed changesets: 67) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9774612812 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-09-14 11:10:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171907511 (Comments: 3) | DullKnifeInDrawer (Discussed changesets: 4) | No problem.. In the Netherlands all buildings have unique addressnodes. Doubletagging results in duplicated addresses. Such an app is limited. Greetz eggie commented 2025-09-14 11:03:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
 | 103276392 (Comments: 4) | zstadler (Discussed changesets: 121) | גם אני לא יודע מה יש בשטח עכשיו. אני גם לא מכיר את ההיסטוריה של סימוני השבילים. אני ממפה סימוני שבילים רק על סמך מה שאני רואה בשטח. commented 2025-09-14 11:02:29 UTC by zstadler ♦1,069 |
| 171463462 (Comments: 1) | Fred3sa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Avez-vous consulté le wiki d'OSM depuis vos modifications sur le barrage de Vaugris ? Un barrage doit être cartographié avec waterway=dam, et non building=* Il peut y avoir des bâtiments su... commented 2025-09-14 11:02:19 UTC by Mevess ♦76 |
| 171579997 (Comments: 4) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 35) | Is there any reason not to change the information as suggested? I am happy to assist you with this. commented 2025-09-14 10:59:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
 | 115753888 (Comments: 1) | Daniel CM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hvor er kilden på, at vejen ned langs den vestlige side af Jernbanegade 12 skal være access=private? Vejen er del af en vandrerute-relation. Har ændret det tilbage. Sig til, hvis du ved at dette er forkert. commented 2025-09-14 10:55:20 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦97 |
| 171017279 (Comments: 1) | relaxxe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You have entered several solar installations using the unusual keys capacity_mw, cluster_id, constructed_after, constructed_before. After consulting the wiki https://wiki.osm.org (especially https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Apl... commented 2025-09-14 10:53:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 170897471 (Comments: 1) | Fred3sa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Annulé dans 171910392 commented 2025-09-14 10:43:38 UTC by Mevess ♦76 |
| 170960761 (Comments: 3) | Fred3sa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Annulé dans 171910248 commented 2025-09-14 10:42:59 UTC by Mevess ♦76 |
| 171887952 (Comments: 2) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 22) | Привет. area:highway заметил, прошу прощения. Остальное принял к сведению, спасибо commented 2025-09-14 10:40:57 UTC by empty_child ♦350 |
 | 171753871 (Comments: 1) | JOAO_PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL CORRENTINA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oi João, tudo bem? Primeiramente, bem-vindo ao OSM! Temos uma comunidade brasileira muito ativa, e estamos felizes com que a Prefeitura de Correntina esteja melhorando o mapa diretamente! A gente viu algumas coisinhas que podem s... commented 2025-09-14 10:30:58 UTC by matheusgomesms ♦61 |
| 171714861 (Comments: 1) | Black Tusk (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you added a 'road number' tag here - shouldn't that be 'ref'? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391144697 commented 2025-09-14 10:14:14 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 171895972 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 80) | Nie wiem czy taka nazwa jest poprawna. Wprawdzie wszyscy mówią, że chodzą do Pijarów, ale tak samo licealiści chodzą do Staszica, Batorego, Czackiego, itp. a jednak tych nazw nie używamy jako alt_name. Ja bym użył czegoś w rodz... commented 2025-09-14 10:13:01 UTC by frydzio ♦63 |
| 171906922 (Comments: 1) | J0S3PH (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://gliwice.eu/aktualnosci/inwestycja-drogowo-kolejowa-w-labedach/wielkie-zmiany-w-labedach-od-1-wrzesnia Na dole strony jest przedstawiona mapa z objazdem i ruchem w okolicy commented 2025-09-14 10:12:20 UTC by J0S3PH ♦1 |
| 171902552 (Comments: 2) | Andrea Del Sarto (Discussed changesets: 60) | così come hai messo non corrisponde alla realtà viaria commented 2025-09-14 10:06:04 UTC by scarburato ♦1 |
| 171906593 (Comments: 1) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 243) | Nummer Korte B moet zijn 30 ipv 52 commented 2025-09-14 09:58:01 UTC by dvdhoven ♦941 |
| 171908274 (Comments: 1) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 243) | Commentaar moet zijn: Drachten, gegevens Xenos van Zuidkade 10 verwijderd, brand gegevens overgezet naar Noordkade 10 commented 2025-09-14 09:57:27 UTC by dvdhoven ♦941 |
| 171727524 (Comments: 1) | skumarchandela_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | The parking aisle that was removed in this changeset, I suspect you intended to break it into two pieces, not remove it? I visited and the parking aisle is still there like in the public aerial images, just needed to be broken in two pieces. commented 2025-09-14 09:54:30 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦35 |
| 171760837 (Comments: 1) | Yan Bakhmat (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello @Yan Bakhmat. Thank you for trying to contribute. However, you have made the same incorrect change twice(the other one:changeset/167468136). Hatay and Antakya aren't exactly the same region names; they cover different areas. Therefore, I h... commented 2025-09-14 09:46:36 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦83 |
| 171892837 (Comments: 2) | Karen Anne Hinchliffe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I'm not sure how to do that? I saw an option to delete and used that. I'll have another go although I'm surprised that someone would add it again? Thank you for your advice. commented 2025-09-14 09:38:33 UTC by Karen Anne Hinchliffe ♦1 |
| X | 169776475 (Comments: 5) | Berlin53 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Bin hier fündig geworden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Droad#Zuordnung_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_zum_Netzwerk . Nun ist die B 1 kein Netzwerk (deswegen Superroute) aber die Namensgebung könnte man übernehmen: Bundesstra&szli... commented 2025-09-14 09:34:11 UTC by Berlin53 ♦63 |
| 171885610 (Comments: 1) | GD1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | are you sure this isn't a temporary feature? commented 2025-09-14 09:21:04 UTC by Amul ♦7 |
 | 171882111 (Comments: 1) | Iceman1415 (Discussed changesets: 6) | survey by neko14: https://streetcomplete.app/p/304779.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/304780.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/304781.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/304782.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/304783.jpg https://street... commented 2025-09-14 09:20:31 UTC by Iceman1415 ♦6 |
| 171883334 (Comments: 1) | Iceman1415 (Discussed changesets: 6) | survey by neko14: https://streetcomplete.app/p/304777.jpg commented 2025-09-14 09:17:01 UTC by Iceman1415 ♦6 |
| 171731521 (Comments: 1) | Iceman1415 (Discussed changesets: 6) | survey by neko14: https://streetcomplete.app/p/261106.jpg commented 2025-09-14 09:16:27 UTC by Iceman1415 ♦6 |
| 171736271 (Comments: 1) | Iceman1415 (Discussed changesets: 6) | survey by neko14 https://streetcomplete.app/p/282190.jpg commented 2025-09-14 09:15:16 UTC by Iceman1415 ♦6 |
| 171900348 (Comments: 1) | Iceman1415 (Discussed changesets: 6) | survey by neko14: https://streetcomplete.app/p/288236.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/304775.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/304776.jpg commented 2025-09-14 09:14:18 UTC by Iceman1415 ♦6 |
| 171817185 (Comments: 1) | Iceman1415 (Discussed changesets: 6) | survey by neko14: https://streetcomplete.app/p/288235.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/288236.jpg commented 2025-09-14 09:12:56 UTC by Iceman1415 ♦6 |
| 171892977 (Comments: 1) | ynx (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355942979 это все ворота?) commented 2025-09-14 09:06:21 UTC by literan ♦6,781 |
| 171905035 (Comments: 1) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 162) | может на commercial исправить? commented 2025-09-14 09:04:05 UTC by literan ♦6,781 |
| 161829864 (Comments: 3) | ZeroGravityCoffee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vielen Dank für die Klarstellung! commented 2025-09-14 09:03:11 UTC by ceyu ♦38 |
| 171899097 (Comments: 1) | tastrax (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thanks ;-) commented 2025-09-14 09:01:38 UTC by greyim ♦22 |
| 171905072 (Comments: 3) | aziz2424 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The road numbers on Google Maps are wrong. In any case, their maps have copyrights on them and copying from them is prohibited. I am from the area and know the roads. The old road 60 is now road 348 and is mostly closed off with gates. The m... commented 2025-09-14 09:01:16 UTC by hatul ♦383 |
| 168090246 (Comments: 1) | Chebu_rek (Discussed changesets: 1) | при повторении подобных правок (с рощей, удалением тегов с мачт) вас будет ждать блокировка commented 2025-09-14 09:00:13 UTC by literan ♦6,781 |
 | 171900669 (Comments: 1) | lpf452 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2025-09-14 08:58:29 UTC by jack walker2 ♦3 |
| 171871847 (Comments: 2) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 51) | No problem at all. commented 2025-09-14 08:53:24 UTC by Paul Berry ♦126 |
| 171887991 (Comments: 1) | CH'97 (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for resolving the note and updating the map. The only suggestion I would make is that you replace the current access=no tag (no access for any transport mode) with foot=private and ... commented 2025-09-14 08:50:29 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,601 |
| 171814702 (Comments: 2) | Paul Schuchard - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171832621 commented 2025-09-14 08:44:35 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171904262 (Comments: 1) | ZireaelDWii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-14 08:44:32 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171815798 (Comments: 2) | skylarmediaon (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905611 commented 2025-09-14 08:44:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171819835 (Comments: 2) | Bodyrevivalnp (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171832536 commented 2025-09-14 08:43:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171820751 (Comments: 2) | phillipsconnect (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905579 commented 2025-09-14 08:43:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171823486 (Comments: 2) | Rich Plack - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171832318 commented 2025-09-14 08:42:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171830043 (Comments: 2) | Edgewater Dental Arts (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171832078 commented 2025-09-14 08:42:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171903040 (Comments: 1) | Sndr3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-14 08:41:47 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171832123 (Comments: 2) | mehmednaim (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171849311 commented 2025-09-14 08:41:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171832751 (Comments: 2) | aadcoca (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905515 commented 2025-09-14 08:40:48 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171858591 (Comments: 2) | Terry Sparks - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171862507 commented 2025-09-14 08:40:13 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171860550 (Comments: 2) | Performance Tower Hire (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905477 commented 2025-09-14 08:39:47 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171875029 (Comments: 2) | James Lewis Electrical (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171876797 commented 2025-09-14 08:39:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171887966 (Comments: 2) | Golden Shield Life Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905427 commented 2025-09-14 08:38:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171902615 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Fort Worth - Downtown (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171903415 commented 2025-09-14 08:37:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171728130 (Comments: 2) | Hyperion Home Remodel & Contracting (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/171905297 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-09-14 08:35:26 UTC by NeisRevert ♦239 |
| 171728996 (Comments: 2) | Doug White: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171733814 commented 2025-09-14 08:34:38 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171761866 (Comments: 3) | La Habra Concrete Corp (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905218 commented 2025-09-14 08:33:23 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 160324393 (Comments: 2) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 31) | I presume they're judging based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:usage%3Dmain: "a railway with higher traffic and higher speed than branch lines, often double tracked and/or electrified, may be high speed, usually longer than a br... commented 2025-09-14 08:30:54 UTC by astro_furball ♦5 |
| 171765604 (Comments: 2) | Laxmeesh Mike Nayak (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171768216 commented 2025-09-14 08:30:01 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171895362 (Comments: 1) | FACUOS (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello FACUOS, the building here was already well mapped, and there was no need to delete it and replace it with what you mapped. Your changes have been reversed as a result. Best, Sam commented 2025-09-14 08:29:11 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦97 |
| 171771035 (Comments: 2) | Gonzalo Duran (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905039 commented 2025-09-14 08:29:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171772980 (Comments: 2) | iykykloungenyc (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905013 commented 2025-09-14 08:28:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171775530 (Comments: 2) | Maike Kreusch (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/171776075 commented 2025-09-14 08:27:37 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171777914 (Comments: 2) | Integratedequities (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171904950 commented 2025-09-14 08:26:27 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171778190 (Comments: 3) | Jeremy Normand - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171781096 commented 2025-09-14 08:25:49 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171784656 (Comments: 2) | Alex Tsekhanovsky (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171792690 commented 2025-09-14 08:25:24 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171811379 (Comments: 3) | Saint Raphael Roofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171813160 commented 2025-09-14 08:24:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171668688 (Comments: 2) | advantagehpe (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171670670 commented 2025-09-14 08:23:35 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171669849 (Comments: 2) | advantagehpe (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171673053 commented 2025-09-14 08:23:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171893479 (Comments: 1) | Graham_Johnson (Discussed changesets: 4) | (Review requested) The outline of the path looks fine, as it's from your own GPX file. However you probably don't need to add an access=no tag here. If horses and bicycles are prohibited and it's pedestrian only, you coul... commented 2025-09-14 08:21:52 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,601 |
| 171671194 (Comments: 2) | airwaydentalmore (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171673020 commented 2025-09-14 08:21:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171671241 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Davis (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171672927 commented 2025-09-14 08:21:00 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
 | 171672374 (Comments: 2) | Car Rental Palawan (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171781891 commented 2025-09-14 08:20:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171673705 (Comments: 3) | oaktreeresidence (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171674827 commented 2025-09-14 08:19:56 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171675018 (Comments: 2) | Alexlucky0102 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171686024 commented 2025-09-14 08:19:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
 | 171202349 (Comments: 1) | LM_1 (Discussed changesets: 5) | "Protipovodňová opatření" není vlastní jméno, tedy nepatří do name= commented 2025-09-14 08:18:59 UTC by martin-kokos ♦35 |
 | 171680057 (Comments: 2) | IKA001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171904690 commented 2025-09-14 08:18:41 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171680955 (Comments: 2) | portcityfamilycosmeticdentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171685632 commented 2025-09-14 08:17:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 164643848 (Comments: 6) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 200) | Ok. Sounds like I am going to have to mark more of your low quality edits for review. commented 2025-09-14 08:17:03 UTC by martin-kokos ♦35 |
| 171714589 (Comments: 2) | premiervascularny (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171904635 commented 2025-09-14 08:16:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171719792 (Comments: 2) | ARCE NACARIO: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171720751 commented 2025-09-14 08:16:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171540431 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Bellevue (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171556214 commented 2025-09-14 08:12:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171550760 (Comments: 3) | Early-Image (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171564041 commented 2025-09-14 08:11:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171554121 (Comments: 2) | Kawsar Hosain (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171574608 commented 2025-09-14 08:11:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171558106 (Comments: 2) | Kawsar Hosain (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171570913 commented 2025-09-14 08:10:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171576476 (Comments: 3) | Dogtopia of Columbus - Dublin (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171581420 commented 2025-09-14 08:10:22 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171576554 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Canton (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171581278 commented 2025-09-14 08:09:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171583982 (Comments: 3) | Disayana (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/171584568 commented 2025-09-14 08:09:04 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171595684 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Chesterfield (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171599401 commented 2025-09-14 08:08:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171599268 (Comments: 3) | Dogtopia of Carriage Crossing (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171615918 commented 2025-09-14 08:07:25 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171610206 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Dedhams (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171615826 commented 2025-09-14 08:06:38 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171616873 (Comments: 2) | afixsecurityguardservices (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171620072 commented 2025-09-14 08:06:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171640604 (Comments: 2) | Jo-be-co (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/171642161 commented 2025-09-14 08:05:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171653130 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Daybreak (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171654046 commented 2025-09-14 08:04:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171654143 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Cypress (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171745860 commented 2025-09-14 08:03:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171660838 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Decatur (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171670840 commented 2025-09-14 08:02:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171664751 (Comments: 2) | drschinpharardentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171670612 commented 2025-09-14 08:02:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171865409 (Comments: 3) | FlySwatter (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Max, danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich kann die Begründung zur Löschung nachvollziehen, allerdings habe ich den Eindruck, dass einige der entfernten Wege durchaus sinnvoll gemappt waren. Durch das Tagging war erkennbar... commented 2025-09-14 07:57:42 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171874945 (Comments: 3) | Grimson (Discussed changesets: 5) | No problem.... kwaad kan het niet. Ik heb volgens mij niets gecorrigeerd. Zie het als tip. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-14 07:44:24 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171896226 (Comments: 1) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Dag Karel... Netjes ingetekend. Ik heb De accesstags voor een bromfietspad NL:G12a toegevoegd conform het verder verloop van het fietspad. Mocht het geen G12a fietspad zijn laat het dan even weten. G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 |
| 171814521 (Comments: 1) | saint645 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Why to remove the name? Now navigator app may miss the street name commented 2025-09-14 07:27:59 UTC by Sanniu ♦576 |
| 171901179 (Comments: 1) | martienos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag martien Nooit een welkomst berich ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog .. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Format phone altijd +31 voor Nederland. Ik ... commented 2025-09-14 07:17:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171901956 (Comments: 1) | Roelof Pieter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Roelof, Generally cuisine=coffee_shop is used in combination with amenity=cafe. This would apply to any Starbucks branch for example. In UK English gebruiken we voor wat wij een coffeeshop noemen shop=canabis https://wiki.openstr... commented 2025-09-14 07:14:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171901250 (Comments: 1) | OpportunityAstronaut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-14 07:08:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
 | 171902595 (Comments: 1) | Road Ranger (Discussed changesets: 1) | ERRATA: Not updating, only added official name of the village. commented 2025-09-14 07:06:12 UTC by Road Ranger ♦1 |
| 171887970 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 10) | Danke commented 2025-09-14 07:03:08 UTC by opendcc ♦1,546 |
| 171884761 (Comments: 1) | RobChafer (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, You inadvertently squared up the long boundary line Way: 449518772. I've reinstated it to the original position so all is well. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-09-14 06:41:31 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
| 171533602 (Comments: 1) | ZLima12 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Thank you for doing reverting this. commented 2025-09-14 06:34:10 UTC by Aeuri ♦2 |
| 171896520 (Comments: 1) | wolframfriele (Discussed changesets: 1) | Korrekt wäre hier wohl: disused:highway=path commented 2025-09-14 06:29:21 UTC by martinst ♦326 |
 | 170760421 (Comments: 2) | googlenaut (Discussed changesets: 133) | Cause overlaping building should be building:part not just building. Nothing broken. Nothing deleted. commented 2025-09-14 06:28:59 UTC by googlenaut ♦47 |
| 171900886 (Comments: 1) | KaiPankrath (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, the buildings you added here are generally valid but oversized. This led to issues where some footprints overlapped other unmapped buildings visible in the imagery. Unless you're sure that a building shares a wall with another it's best... commented 2025-09-14 06:25:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171901456 (Comments: 2) | Gregory Peony (Discussed changesets: 7) | Accidental comment on my own changeset. OSMCha failed to load the target changeset. commented 2025-09-14 06:24:23 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171871447 (Comments: 1) | drutten84 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej Du har genom ett antal changesets försökt att detaljrita golfklubbens område. Dessvärre verkar du inte förstå hur en multipolygon-relation fungerar. Det här är resultatet: https://tools.geofabr... commented 2025-09-14 05:53:52 UTC by archie ♦1,335 |
| 171898730 (Comments: 2) | manjita pandey (Discussed changesets: 5) | See how I mapped the footpritns here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171900733 commented 2025-09-14 05:21:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171860652 (Comments: 2) | Lejun (Discussed changesets: 77) | Oops, my bad! Thank for your review! commented 2025-09-14 05:21:10 UTC by Lejun ♦497 |
| 171900402 (Comments: 1) | katya75 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you identified buildings in imagery but most footpritns you map are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in ... commented 2025-09-14 05:20:30 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171857564 (Comments: 2) | JARED YOEL CANARE GUZMAN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por todas las ediciones en el mapa. Por favor, cuando guardes los cambios, lo mejor es escribir un resumen del cambio, no importa el tamaño, puede ser "estación policial o nombre calle, etc"..... commented 2025-09-14 04:57:40 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,590 |
| 171899921 (Comments: 1) | katya75 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, There's reason to believe that all footprints you've mapped here represent buildings, however they are generally oversized; please map the footprints slightly smaller than the pitched roofs you see in imagery. Thank you for your contrib... commented 2025-09-14 04:48:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 38158778 (Comments: 2) | continuus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Photographie de la plaque de voie "Le valla" : https://maps.app.goo.gl/TmRKvpa7WgVLQSPy8 commented 2025-09-14 04:41:33 UTC by continuus ♦4 |
| 171850385 (Comments: 1) | Yacine Boussoufa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, can you please check the highway classification of your new way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417856545#map=19/43.173348/13.684269&layers=VN ? From the topology of the roundabout I believe that it is not connected to the round... commented 2025-09-14 04:40:36 UTC by ratrun ♦249 |
| 171898499 (Comments: 1) | Vibhi356 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, when mapping square features please right click and select square, or press q after tagging to square the corners of features. I resolved this in Changeset: 171898709 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you... commented 2025-09-14 02:41:26 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171893514 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, you have generally identified buildings in the imagery and mapped them quite accurately. They'd be even more accurate if you map the footprint slightly smaller than the roof you see. You created some invalid shared nodes between buildings... commented 2025-09-14 02:27:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171888500 (Comments: 1) | Rhamear (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi again! When you saved this changeset you added what's called a "node drag", where one of the nodes that was under your mouse while panning the map got moved accidentally. It's easy to do – especially in dense areas l... commented 2025-09-14 02:24:14 UTC by iandees ♦736 |
| 171894067 (Comments: 2) | Kushii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Kushii. Please don't map fantasy features in OSM. Thanks. Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group. commented 2025-09-14 02:12:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
 | 171864206 (Comments: 1) | NZ Maps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, please don't add layer=-1 just to silence the validator warnings. The correct solution is to fix the overlapping building and road. You can do this very quickly in the editor by selecting the building and pressing `M` on your keyboar... commented 2025-09-14 02:12:06 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦404 |
| 171897099 (Comments: 2) | cardboardBox (Discussed changesets: 1) | I thought it was being knocked down but whoops, just renovated. I put it back. commented 2025-09-14 01:58:22 UTC by cardboardBox ♦1 |
| 171897448 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! The footprint you added here represents a building in the imagery, well spotted! I think this building is actually square becasue the shadow it casts is straight. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898153 I... commented 2025-09-14 01:49:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171897457 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! The footprint you added here represents a building in the imagery, well spotted! It is however oversized and should be squared. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898110 When mapping buildings, please trace... commented 2025-09-14 01:43:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171897086 (Comments: 1) | Vibhi356 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! All footprints you added here represent buildings in the imagery but they should be squared and sometimes you only used one half of the roof to map them. Condider the roof shape and how the scene is lit. See how I mapped the northern ... commented 2025-09-14 01:38:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171895637 (Comments: 1) | greyim (Discussed changesets: 19) | doesnt show up on rendering? commented 2025-09-14 01:32:42 UTC by greyim ♦22 |
| 171896722 (Comments: 1) | savant1821 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi savant1821, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field... commented 2025-09-13 23:36:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171602226 (Comments: 1) | MarkZhang2026 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi there! its good practice to leave changeset comments so its more clear to other local editors what is changing. it can be simple like *added bicycle parking* , *added benches* , etc. Happy mapping! -Fen commented 2025-09-13 23:30:31 UTC by Fen <3 ♦6 |
 | 171782797 (Comments: 1) | Mirditor22 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Concerns has been raised about this changeset, which used an editing practice similar to a blocked user (slip road layout by the roundabout not reflecting reality). Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/report-vandalism-or-concerns-about-e... commented 2025-09-13 23:21:36 UTC by ika-chan! ♦278 |
 | 171806148 (Comments: 1) | Mirditor22 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Concerns has been raised about this changeset, which has editing practices similar to a blocked user. Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/report-vandalism-or-concerns-about-edits-here/4223/217. --- ... commented 2025-09-13 23:20:20 UTC by ika-chan! ♦278 |
| 171881236 (Comments: 1) | Variags (Discussed changesets: 1) | здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. я поправил точку, повесил тег магазина инструмента и крепежа (как наиболее близкий, если у вас продажа ... commented 2025-09-13 23:03:04 UTC by 4004 ♦1,901 |
 | 171787571 (Comments: 4) | Anil Basnet (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ok do as per your choice. commented 2025-09-13 22:57:37 UTC by Anil Basnet ♦53 |
| 171799240 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 22:51:35 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦220 |
| 171799224 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 22:51:32 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦220 |
| 171799221 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 22:51:28 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦220 |
| 171799210 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 22:51:26 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦220 |
| 171799204 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 22:51:24 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦220 |
| 171799198 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 22:51:20 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦220 |
| 171799184 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 22:51:15 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦220 |
| 171617744 (Comments: 1) | O_ema (Discussed changesets: 2) | dont forget there is also mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=210170211639069&focus=photo commented 2025-09-13 22:50:12 UTC by 4004 ♦1,901 |
| 171751543 (Comments: 1) | MR GIS (Discussed changesets: 1) | شكرا جزيلاً لك على جهودك الطيبة commented 2025-09-13 22:39:00 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦715 |
| 171878999 (Comments: 4) | frydzio (Discussed changesets: 11) | Najlepsze są te schodki od strony al. PW na trawniczki między budynkami :D Nie wiadomo, czy mapować je jako steps czy dwa razy kerb, jak prowadzą w sumie donikąd. commented 2025-09-13 22:34:26 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦220 |
| 171855403 (Comments: 1) | Mirditor22 (Discussed changesets: 6) | The way the motorway exit is placed and tagged is fine: please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:placement%3Dtransition on how it works. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171895681 commented 2025-09-13 22:24:32 UTC by ika-chan! ♦278 |
 | 171515928 (Comments: 2) | karitotp (Discussed changesets: 57) | Thanks for pointing this out. It was an slip while mapping different projects. commented 2025-09-13 22:17:02 UTC by karitotp ♦124 |
| 171895139 (Comments: 1) | evunia (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-09-13 22:11:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 169998928 (Comments: 2) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 24) | Niesamowicie (nie)treściwy opis zmiany "wycofanie wandalizmu" Na czym polegał ten wandalizm, czego dotyczył ??? Sensowniejszy opis ułatwił by innym bytowanie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze... commented 2025-09-13 22:10:57 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦525 |
| 160791705 (Comments: 2) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 118) | It is corrected commented 2025-09-13 21:58:28 UTC by Eebie ♦135 |
| 171752702 (Comments: 1) | MangoTheCorgo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I have reverted this changeset for the following reasons: 1. The renaming was only done for the alternative name, in which the renaming is partially complete, but causes discrepancies. 2. Name of the road was correctly labeled according... commented 2025-09-13 21:54:32 UTC by mewhenthe ♦5 |
| 171880014 (Comments: 3) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, alles kein Problem, Hydranten sind auch nicht gerade ein einfaches Thema. Falls die Saugstelle so wie hier https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%B6schwasserbrunnen#/media/Datei:L%C3%B6schwasserbrunnen_bei_Trebel.jpg aussieht, wäre... commented 2025-09-13 21:46:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 171894481 (Comments: 1) | burrscurr (Discussed changesets: 28) | Korrektur zur Quelle: eigentlich Luftbild + lokales Wissen commented 2025-09-13 21:39:45 UTC by burrscurr ♦84 |
| 171325176 (Comments: 1) | alessandrocarmeli (Discussed changesets: 137) | Posso conoscere motivo della rimozione dei boschi? commented 2025-09-13 21:33:45 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦305 |
 | 171776085 (Comments: 3) | M Americus (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, if the path exists then I revert your edit. thanks. commented 2025-09-13 21:15:22 UTC by hatul ♦383 |
| 170693528 (Comments: 1) | faleh aldosri (Discussed changesets: 4) | هل الاسم الصحيح هو"غار قراده" commented 2025-09-13 21:05:28 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦715 |
| 171804613 (Comments: 2) | Jan0815 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vielen Dank fürs ausführliche Anschauen. Ich habe alle Punkte angepasst (Ich denke nun ist es korrekt) und eine Hecke als Barrier ergänzt. Vielleicht hilfts ja. Schönes Wochenende! commented 2025-09-13 20:55:38 UTC by Jan0815 ♦1 |
| 171885676 (Comments: 1) | frantzius2177 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Die Häuser sind abgerissen und die Garagen stehen noch? An der Trave 40 und 42. Sehr merkwürdig. commented 2025-09-13 20:48:08 UTC by letihu ♦801 |
| 171892890 (Comments: 1) | PrzemekF (Discussed changesets: 47) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286572032 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-09-13 20:41:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171819951 (Comments: 1) | Emil1887 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Emil1887, die Fahrradstraße existiert noch nicht. Die Bauarbeiten haben erst angefangen. Ich habe ein Revert deiner Änderung gemacht. Bitte in Zukunft erst Änderungen eintragen, falls es auch tatsächlich passi... commented 2025-09-13 20:23:14 UTC by eserte ♦148 |
| 171842923 (Comments: 4) | Frieder Knabe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Frieder, ich hab noch etwas nachgearbeitet... aus deinem area=yes habe ich ein area:highway=service + service=emergency_access gemacht. Außerdem sind/waren in Briescht viele Flächen mit Straßen wir sagen "ve... commented 2025-09-13 20:19:22 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,055 |
| 171889194 (Comments: 1) | DutchUsername (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-13 20:15:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 156767409 (Comments: 1) | TonyS999 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, was adding not:brand:wikidata=Q922344 (i.e. not Morrisons) to the petrol station named Morrisons an error, or is this actually not a Morrisons petrol station? commented 2025-09-13 20:15:53 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦87 |
| 169943904 (Comments: 1) | KotKotKat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonsoir, Merci pour vos contributions sur l'agglomération messine Pourriez vous utiliser les tags contact:housenumber et contact:street sur les commerces pour éviter les doublons avec les noeuds adresses ? L'utilisati... commented 2025-09-13 20:14:45 UTC by jbcharron ♦112 |
| 171090518 (Comments: 3) | あじさか (Discussed changesets: 5) | You're welcome, and thank you for your response and explanation of your workflow. I have taken a look at the Japan GSI seamlessphoto layer in this area and think that you made a good decision to use it to obtain footprint shapes; the way the sce... commented 2025-09-13 20:14:18 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171835421 (Comments: 2) | xman456 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thank you so much-i was a little confused. i dont see them on the map now. they are FLOCK cameras. commented 2025-09-13 20:08:59 UTC by xman456 ♦1 |
| 170416422 (Comments: 1) | cdevers (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please stop changing roads to prohibit foot traffic unless there is a legal restriction in place. commented 2025-09-13 20:06:53 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦119 |
| 170976845 (Comments: 2) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 149) | Oeps, bedankt voor de melding. Enkel het adres was verkeerd. commented 2025-09-13 20:04:44 UTC by M!dgard ♦797 |
| 171507003 (Comments: 1) | cdevers (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please stop changing roads to prohibit foot traffic unless there is a legal restriction in place. The presence of sidewalks already indicates pedestrian access, so edits should reflect official, verifiable rules—not assumptions. commented 2025-09-13 20:04:12 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦119 |
| 171854351 (Comments: 1) | Sim713 (Discussed changesets: 1) | please don't use descriptive names like "Grassy area" - not every object needs a name! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only commented 2025-09-13 19:56:15 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 170466935 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 24) | I dlaczego to wycofujesz? Przecież to ty dokonujesz wandalizmu... commented 2025-09-13 19:38:54 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
 | 171759299 (Comments: 1) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zdravím, ako sa píše na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fitness%20station "The tag fitness_station=* is added to describe the type of exercise equipment within a leisure=fitness_station." Prosím neoz... commented 2025-09-13 19:36:50 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,016 |
| 171878355 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 24) | Świetnie, oby tak dalej. Nie dość, że ignorujesz komentarze, nie podajesz źródeł to bawisz się reverterem jak zabawką przywracając błędy. Po co tak robić? commented 2025-09-13 19:34:22 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 171747883 (Comments: 4) | MikeHameln (Discussed changesets: 3) | Radfahren und Fußweg. Schilder sind noch nicht angebracht. commented 2025-09-13 19:30:19 UTC by MikeHameln ♦1 |
| 158119535 (Comments: 1) | agam_hershko (Discussed changesets: 1) | אתה בטוח שיש פה נקודת מים? commented 2025-09-13 18:46:19 UTC by Dindia ♦25 |
| 171867047 (Comments: 1) | ececorlu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, Q tuşuna basarak bina geometrilerinin köşelerini dik hale getirebilirsiniz. commented 2025-09-13 18:40:05 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171846945 (Comments: 1) | Todeskuh (Discussed changesets: 26) | Achtung Herzinfarkt für dich ;) Du hast die Sache mit dem building:part verbockt. Wenn man ein Gebäude mit building:part in seine Einzelteile zerlegt braucht man ein normales building, dass lückenlos mit mehreren building:part ausge... commented 2025-09-13 18:18:00 UTC by 0xb7767000 ♦15 |
| 171753166 (Comments: 1) | lilith hotaro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, all footprints you mapped here represent buildings in the imagery. They could be more accurate if you genearally mapped them smaller because pitched roofs tend to overhang building walls. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape acc... commented 2025-09-13 18:09:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171751064 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, every footprints you added here represents a building in the imagery but they could be more accurate and should have been squared. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population esti... commented 2025-09-13 18:00:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171751393 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the NE footprint envelopes multiple buildings. Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snap... commented 2025-09-13 17:57:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 162046968 (Comments: 1) | nerr543 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-13 17:57:13 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 167363101 (Comments: 1) | nerr543 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-13 17:57:03 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171884927 (Comments: 1) | nerr543 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-13 17:56:53 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171880035 (Comments: 2) | Roelof Pieter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi Eggie. Ik moest even begrijpen wat je bedoelde, maar ik snap 'm nu. Logisch. Bedankt voor de aanwijzing. Zal ik doen. Grtz, Roelof commented 2025-09-13 17:56:48 UTC by Roelof Pieter ♦1 |
| 171751603 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Anya, Assuming you were asking if the western most footprint here represents a building my answer is that, yes, it does, and I think that all the footprints you added here represent buildings. It is obscured by vegetation, but there is evid... commented 2025-09-13 17:53:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171886150 (Comments: 1) | G_P_J (Discussed changesets: 321) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13141195096 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-09-13 17:41:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171840073 (Comments: 1) | kabantecno (Discussed changesets: 6) | Поправил commented 2025-09-13 17:31:46 UTC by s777n ♦281 |
| 171885752 (Comments: 1) | MTB Rijk van Nijmegen (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag MTB RvN De namen van fietsroutes zitten al op de relatie. MTB Shimano Groesbeek We zetten dus geen naam op het wegdeel zelf behalve als het stukje weg echt die naam heeft. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-13 17:29:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171839732 (Comments: 1) | kabantecno (Discussed changesets: 6) | Поправил commented 2025-09-13 17:28:34 UTC by s777n ♦281 |
 | 171880440 (Comments: 1) | Sylv3st3r (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! Thanks for contributing to the map. Before you start mapping, always make sure that the background is aligned to the rest of the features already on the map. To align the background in iD, go into the background settings by clicking on the ico... commented 2025-09-13 17:27:13 UTC by cassette8778 ♦2 |
| 171839440 (Comments: 1) | kabantecno (Discussed changesets: 6) | Поправил commented 2025-09-13 17:27:02 UTC by s777n ♦281 |
| 164067755 (Comments: 1) | Nancray (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et merci de votre intérêt pour le projet OpenStreetMap. J'ai trouvé et corrigé quelques erreurs dans vos contributions comme l'ajout d'une société de taxi au milieu de nulle part. En cas... commented 2025-09-13 17:10:52 UTC by Lejun ♦497 |
| 97856905 (Comments: 3) | MSmolarz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ich glaube ich habe die bereits korrigiert. Grüße Chris :) commented 2025-09-13 16:49:14 UTC by chris66 ♦400 |
| 168281691 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 301) | Na północnym krańcu trunk mógł się kończyć dalej. commented 2025-09-13 16:37:52 UTC by theDM ♦134 |
 | 169015395 (Comments: 1) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 13) | Please don't add natural=peak to mountain passes, those are completely different entities. Please don't disconnect natural=peak from the natural=ridge, the former are part of the latter (with some minor exceptions, of course) commented 2025-09-13 16:23:39 UTC by one_half_3544 ♦46 |
| 171868144 (Comments: 1) | Ouss_5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ouss, please, stop your bullshit, I discussed this in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171795836 Discuss it with me first, please. Check the official document I sent at the end. commented 2025-09-13 16:20:10 UTC by ilias_ ♦249 |
| 171703896 (Comments: 5) | RFuser11 (Discussed changesets: 56) | ок. Спасибо за рекомендацию commented 2025-09-13 16:07:28 UTC by RFuser11 ♦43 |
| 171798295 (Comments: 5) | RFuser11 (Discussed changesets: 56) | спасибо за ваши комментарии и отдельно за ваше мнение. Оно очень важно. Постараюсь вносить правки в более размеренном темпе commented 2025-09-13 16:06:13 UTC by RFuser11 ♦43 |
| 170379528 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_Dang (Discussed changesets: 7) | Tên bạn viết sai nhé. Ngách 61 nằm trong ngõ 241, biển tên đường như tôi đã viết là ngách 241/61. Tôi không hiểu sao bạn lại sửa tên lung tung như ... commented 2025-09-13 16:00:34 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦9 |
| 171853986 (Comments: 1) | Oscar Felipe Hoyos Carvajal (Discussed changesets: 2) | None of your mappings was squared: After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners. All your mappings were oversized. The humanitarian teams use the size of ... commented 2025-09-13 15:56:55 UTC by Kraan46 ♦24 |
| 171876621 (Comments: 1) | Ovidiu C (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-13 15:31:06 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171796591 (Comments: 2) | Damian05 (Discussed changesets: 46) | To nie pomyłka, ten user bardzo do siebie wziął do serca zachowywanie historii :D commented 2025-09-13 15:24:36 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦738 |
| 171489569 (Comments: 1) | Schorsch2025 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Da hier Rechtsformen explizit hinzugefügt wurden eine info aus dem Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:operator > Die Rechtsform des Unternehmens kann weggelassen werden, da OSM kein Handelsregister ist. Für "... commented 2025-09-13 15:14:50 UTC by FroschForscher ♦75 |
| 171859283 (Comments: 1) | mcdonaldsworker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM! Glad to see a new editor. (One thing I’ll mention here is that the school names you’re adding are already tagged on the school grounds area, so don’t need to be added again.) Thanks again, there’s a little ... commented 2025-09-13 15:10:04 UTC by seattlefyi ♦375 |
| 171751800 (Comments: 3) | DankJae (Discussed changesets: 11) | amended [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171880332] commented 2025-09-13 15:09:42 UTC by DankJae ♦18 |
| 171833841 (Comments: 5) | rompe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für die Korrektur! Ich wäre nächste Woche ohnehin noch einmal über die Änderungen gegangen, schon weil ich bestimmt meine eingezeichneten Wege noch begradigen muss. Aber wie die 30er Zone zu behandeln ist, hätt... commented 2025-09-13 14:57:04 UTC by rompe ♦5 |
| 171874157 (Comments: 1) | Grimson (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Grimson.. Ik heb layer=-1 verwijderd en yes aangepast naar building_passage Groet eggie commented 2025-09-13 14:35:33 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171817272 (Comments: 1) | Jamima (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/13137729851. What is the mean of the tags should i go there? = humanitarian aid supportNet = Humanitarian aid where to go? = humanitarian aid commented 2025-09-13 14:34:57 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171874963 (Comments: 2) | olecky (Discussed changesets: 13) | Right, thanks. I didn't notice that each of the containers is a separate POI. Deleted with: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171878516 commented 2025-09-13 14:33:40 UTC by olecky ♦15 |
| 171872498 (Comments: 2) | jazzy76jeff (Discussed changesets: 1) | fixed company tagging commented 2025-09-13 14:33:02 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
 | 171852477 (Comments: 1) | NFZANMNIM (Discussed changesets: 148) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/297290339. What is the mean of the tag w = Delgerkhaan, Khentii aimag, Mongolia ? commented 2025-09-13 14:30:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171875640 (Comments: 1) | aacomm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Anche qui la restrizione è corretta, se le indicazioni sono errate non è colpa del database https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171877497 commented 2025-09-13 14:09:28 UTC by Mannivu ♦241 |
| 163305428 (Comments: 1) | Chenshi (Discussed changesets: 31) | Moin! Du hast hier ohne Nachfrage an diversen highway=* das tag zone:traffic entfernt. Ich frage mich, ob es dafür irgendeinen guten Grund gab? Es ist nämlich viel Arbeit, die alle richtig zu erfassen. commented 2025-09-13 14:06:25 UTC by GerdP ♦2,767 |
| 171798356 (Comments: 1) | joooo_aah (Discussed changesets: 2) | operator=Arverio Bayern operator:wikidata=Q1152124 <-DB Vertrieb brand=Deutsche Bahn brand:wikidata=Q9322 <-Deutsche Bahn Bitte nochmal prüfen, die operator Daten passen nicht zusammen. commented 2025-09-13 14:05:47 UTC by FroschForscher ♦75 |
 | 171872818 (Comments: 2) | xkillah (Discussed changesets: 9) | yes, cycleway interrupts at the bus stop and there is no cycleway at this segment commented 2025-09-13 14:02:20 UTC by xkillah ♦77 |
| 171864862 (Comments: 1) | Mittul Shah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5971791871 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-09-13 13:57:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171823734 (Comments: 1) | Schorsch2025 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welches Schild hängt hier das es Kunden verbietet zu reiten? Es sollte sich grundsätzlich kein Zugangsregelungen ausgedacht werden sondern nur vor Ort ausgeschilderte Zugangsregelungen gesetzt werden. FroschForscher commented 2025-09-13 13:56:06 UTC by FroschForscher ♦75 |
| 171825881 (Comments: 1) | Schorsch2025 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Schorsch2025, ist das hier ein Metzgereigeschäft. Kann ich da (während der Öffnungszeiten) hereingehen und Fleisch kaufen. Oder ist es nur der Geschäfts/Firmensitz von einem exklusiven Onlinehändler. Im letzte... commented 2025-09-13 13:51:32 UTC by FroschForscher ♦75 |
| 171413404 (Comments: 1) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 40) | Perché hai modificato l'ordinale in minuscolo? Secondo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade vanno scritti in maiuscolo commented 2025-09-13 13:42:51 UTC by Mannivu ♦241 |
| 171867882 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 24) | Jakie źródło? Na orto tego nie widać. commented 2025-09-13 13:41:42 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 171875485 (Comments: 1) | aacomm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Questa restrizione era corretto, se qualcosa non funziona nelle indicazioni non è di certo questa relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171875809 commented 2025-09-13 13:34:06 UTC by Mannivu ♦241 |
| 171874379 (Comments: 1) | aacomm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Grazie, probabilmente non l'avevo aggiornato dopo aver aperto le altre strade --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171874379 commented 2025-09-13 13:32:58 UTC by Mannivu ♦241 |
| 170704326 (Comments: 1) | kacper112 (Discussed changesets: 18) | nie oznaczaj wszystkiego jako las. takie mniejsze zagajniki to natural=wood commented 2025-09-13 13:00:34 UTC by lukubuku ♦22 |
| 171871727 (Comments: 1) | Keith_Op (Discussed changesets: 1) | Accidentally moved Hard Labor creek connector ~10-15’. Didn't realize until after I saved and can't figure out how to revert. Sorry about that. commented 2025-09-13 12:39:25 UTC by Keith_Op ♦1 |
| 171871322 (Comments: 2) | Knilessew (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dank Compleet overheen gekeken. Dank verder, ben nog een beetje zoekende in de verschillende opties en standaarden hier, maar dat komt vanzelf goed. commented 2025-09-13 12:38:17 UTC by Knilessew ♦1 |
| 171071766 (Comments: 1) | JosephRösch (Discussed changesets: 9) | Poller sind keine verkehrsrechtliche Anordnung, insbesondere verbieten sie Kfz nicht irgendwo lang zu fahren. Sie stellen lediglich eine bauliche Einschränkung dar, aufgrund derer z.B. normalbreite PKW oder LKW dort nicht mehr lang fahren kö... commented 2025-09-13 12:35:55 UTC by maestro_alubia ♦32 |
| 171869544 (Comments: 1) | Joppa Wuite (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-13 12:18:10 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171869669 (Comments: 3) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Voorbeeld echt park met naam https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.782884/4.678298 commented 2025-09-13 12:17:52 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171867770 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 24) | Dlaczego to rozdzieliłeś? Było poprawnie. commented 2025-09-13 12:17:21 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 171646932 (Comments: 4) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 178) | Proponuję nie robić nic do póki nie podejmiemy decyzji czy podwyższyć DTŚ w ramach kryterium ważnościowego commented 2025-09-13 12:13:00 UTC by pavvv ♦550 |
| 155060486 (Comments: 2) | s1m0n379 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Buongiorno Andrea, scusa per la risposta tardiva, ma volevo riverificare fisicamente. Confermo la presenza di una sbarra con cartello di divieto d'accesso all'inizio del segmento sterrato (da via del cassinello in direzione Fornasette). commented 2025-09-13 12:05:06 UTC by s1m0n379 ♦2 |
 | 114632979 (Comments: 3) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 134) | You can see here how the empty nodes of the grass areas had tags added https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114632979 commented 2025-09-13 11:58:59 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦691 |
| 171871405 (Comments: 1) | K4nciasty (Discussed changesets: 52) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. "Świętego Huberta": https://www.openstreetma... commented 2025-09-13 11:51:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171821840 (Comments: 1) | MichaelP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich habe hier noch ein paar Korrekturen vorgenommen. Dadurch das der kurze Weg zwischen der Barbarastraße und der L254 gelöscht wurde, hing das Ende des Feldwegs und der vereinsamte Poller in der Luft. Ich habe beides behoben... commented 2025-09-13 11:41:02 UTC by berndw ♦616 |
| 171858285 (Comments: 2) | Thermostopqc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I think something went a bit wrong here - you accidentally changed the whole industrial area as a shop. Please try again, and just add a point where your premises are. Also, I'd suggest that you don&#... commented 2025-09-13 11:37:23 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 136596129 (Comments: 1) | Danddy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tu sa o ziadnu duplicitu nejedna. Tie studnicky su tam 2, s roznymi nazvami, z roznych obdobi. Stacilo si pozriet fotografie z miesta. Ziadam o vratenie do povodneho stavu. commented 2025-09-13 11:29:31 UTC by jansokoly ♦3 |
| 157587819 (Comments: 1) | vnthn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Was sollte das denn bedeuten? access:conditional = yes@(2025+ Sep 00:00-00:00 open) commented 2025-09-13 11:27:45 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,374 |
| 171870098 (Comments: 1) | giopera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Scusate, volevo mettere CTR ma dopo una conversazione sul retro gaming ho scritto CRT come se fosse un televisore a tubo catodico commented 2025-09-13 11:25:41 UTC by giopera ♦1 |
| 171748280 (Comments: 3) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 10) | Das mag für wikipedia gelten, OSM hat andere Regeln, wobei diese nicht extrem hart zu werten sind. Es kann eine kleine Siedlung z.B. regional bedeutend sein, da muss man abwägen. Was aber auf keinen Fall geht, einfach flächendeckend kl... commented 2025-09-13 11:18:33 UTC by opendcc ♦1,546 |
| 171804127 (Comments: 1) | anastasia_ (Discussed changesets: 46) | можно еще amenity=training + training=sport добавить и лучше такие большие правки не делать, отдельными чейнджсетами вносить commented 2025-09-13 11:12:24 UTC by literan ♦6,781 |
| 171651772 (Comments: 3) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 108) | Die erweiterten Öffnungszeiten scheinen ja laut Bild nur ohne Service zu sein, also können wir opening_hours:self_service verwenden. Dazu noch 2 authentication tags: authentication:app=yes authentication:none:conditional = y... commented 2025-09-13 11:10:06 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 171745143 (Comments: 2) | nkimmel (Discussed changesets: 12) | שוחזר: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171869725 commented 2025-09-13 11:02:01 UTC by NeatNit ♦32 |
| 171864590 (Comments: 1) | grelang (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, rückgängig gemacht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171869501. Die Straße ist aufgrund von Schäden an zwei Stützbauwerken gesperrt, was durch "access=no" korrekt abgebildet ist. Die Bauarbeiten... commented 2025-09-13 11:01:08 UTC by aixbrick ♦854 |
| 171838203 (Comments: 1) | lukubuku (Discussed changesets: 24) | Książęce* commented 2025-09-13 10:56:13 UTC by lukubuku ♦22 |
| 171855139 (Comments: 1) | SomeRailfan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Please don't change geometry on highway transitions. These are following the wiki and are standardized for the whole Montreal region (Quebec soon) and aligned on theoritical gore. I will revert. Thanks! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta... commented 2025-09-13 10:55:18 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦403 |
| 171868491 (Comments: 1) | Magic326 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-13 10:48:12 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171867281 (Comments: 2) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Zou er gewoon de landuse =grass taggen als dat van toepassing is. gr eggie commented 2025-09-13 10:47:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 170068636 (Comments: 2) | Kalkulixi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Du hast recht. Das ist mir nicht aufgefallen. Eine der Spuren war zu der Zeit temporär befahrbar. Verbindung gabs glaube ich nur Vehrter Landstraße in Richtung Osten. Bin aktuell in Schweden, kann es also nicht überprüfen, wie es... commented 2025-09-13 10:40:55 UTC by Kalkulixi ♦1 |
| 171792391 (Comments: 7) | marcrnt (Discussed changesets: 7) | Falls du mitdiskutieren willst, bist du herzlich eingeladen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/datenquelle-erlaubt-wenn-durch-dieses-unternehmen-aktualisiert/135597 commented 2025-09-13 10:36:38 UTC by Metzor ♦383 |
| 170516448 (Comments: 2) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 32) | cierpliwości, jeszcze trzy miesiące, na razie muszą pobyć jako disused ;) commented 2025-09-13 10:07:25 UTC by zuicz ♦279 |
| 171837555 (Comments: 2) | philopsil (Discussed changesets: 9) | nur der Teil südlich der Graf Staufenberg-Straße war explizit als Gehweg beschildert --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171837555 commented 2025-09-13 09:57:33 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,374 |
| 171630410 (Comments: 6) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 118) | I to ma biec innym śladem, a nie przebudowa istniejącego śladu? commented 2025-09-13 09:43:05 UTC by theDM ♦134 |
| 16819169 (Comments: 3) | KX675 (Discussed changesets: 23) | You’re asking about a changeset made 12 years ago and apparently I couldn’t recall the circumstances. I guess MTR did advertise B1-B4 exits at some point before they were replaced with a simple B. FYI B1-B4 are shown in the Buildings Depa... commented 2025-09-13 09:40:25 UTC by KX675 ♦1 |
| 171628689 (Comments: 3) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 118) | cytat z definicji: 1. W przypadku narysowania takiej drogi zawsze podaj źródła potwierdzające, że ta droga rzeczywiście ma zostać zbudowana i że taka ma być jej geometria. 2. Jeśli jest więcej niż jeden wariant budowy to za w... commented 2025-09-13 09:19:36 UTC by theDM ♦134 |
| 171662785 (Comments: 1) | loganlidno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Você cita a lei como fonte de informação, mas onde está o arquivo mostrando o contorno? No OSM não deve-se adicionar duplicações, atualize se houver um elemento existente, que no caso seria esse h... commented 2025-09-13 09:18:43 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,182 |
| 164337056 (Comments: 2) | Skarolinaa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Patrząc na tego użytkownika i chociażby fikcyjny parking "liściasty" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078066952/history/2 to śmiało można usuwać wątpliwe obiekty, jak ten sklep. commented 2025-09-13 09:15:09 UTC by YomanNH ♦339 |
| 171850771 (Comments: 1) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Alle woonstraten zijn inderdaad residential... soms living_street bij woonerfbebording. Doorgaande straten hoger. Bij de import in 2007 vanuit de data van AND (donatie van kaartenmaker over heel nederland) kenden we alleen nog de smaak van... commented 2025-09-13 09:13:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171852048 (Comments: 2) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Opgelost met klein stukje highway=path ipv footway. commented 2025-09-13 09:03:17 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171796404 (Comments: 1) | quietvvv (Discussed changesets: 1) | вул. Шевченка, 11, а не 9... commented 2025-09-13 08:53:53 UTC by RazR83 ♦1 |
| 171727773 (Comments: 8) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 75) | support hatte ich doch schon bestätigt und nutze ich auch bereits bei Radrouten commented 2025-09-13 08:51:47 UTC by Pathumthani ♦33 |
| 171367143 (Comments: 6) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 22) | revertato. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171864956 commented 2025-09-13 08:49:31 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦76 |
| 171863618 (Comments: 1) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Lijkt me oke. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tactile_paving Kan zowel op een node als op een wegelement. Gr eggie commented 2025-09-13 08:46:22 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 27789427 (Comments: 1) | Chenshi (Discussed changesets: 31) | Moin, es ist lang her (2014), aber weißt du noch, ob due den Straßennamen "Birkenhof" aufgrund einer entsprechenden Beschilderung getaggt hast? Tatsächlich gibt es (mittlerweile?) ein Straßenschild "Drangstedter ... commented 2025-09-13 08:34:27 UTC by urk ♦12 |
| 171853157 (Comments: 1) | Waldrenner (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi :) bei Ladestationen ist der Stecker oder die Buchse wesentlich interessanter als "motor_car" oder "hgv". Wenn ich den passenden Stecker habe und die Ladestation genug Leistung liefert, lade ich da alles, was ich will ;)... commented 2025-09-13 08:29:54 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171860865 (Comments: 1) | Frank Hein 666 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi :) du solltest in diesem Fall eine Warnung des Editors bekommen haben, bevor du auf "Speichern" drückst. Der Weg und der Bach kreuzen sich. Wenn der Weg mittels Brücke über den Bach geht: Jeweils am Anfang... commented 2025-09-13 08:18:06 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171704147 (Comments: 2) | hambre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, war ein Versehen. Die Baustelle ist für Fußgänger und Radfahrer weiterhin passierbar. Ich habe die Relation wiederhergestellt. commented 2025-09-13 08:16:07 UTC by hambre ♦2 |
| 171861115 (Comments: 1) | 2137xd (Discussed changesets: 19) | No i po co dałeś construction na zachodniej części węzła jak tam wszystko jest gotowe tylko zostało wyłączone z ruchu? commented 2025-09-13 08:14:00 UTC by Szymson ♦394 |
| 171847522 (Comments: 1) | norvig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Can you please add some footway for the bridge? commented 2025-09-13 07:51:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171824368 (Comments: 2) | Teo_10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao. Come hai fatto a tracciare questo sentiero? Il percorso che vedo sulla Strava Heatmap è differente. Ciao, Andrea --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171824368 ... commented 2025-09-13 07:50:28 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,446 |
| 171862544 (Comments: 1) | Glove5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Glove5, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. Th... commented 2025-09-13 07:46:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 2873907 (Comments: 1) | keinseier (Discussed changesets: 5) | Moin aus Wildeshausen! Ich war in letzter Zeit in der Gegend mit dem Rad unterwegs, um die neuen Radwegweiser zu erfassen. Auf meinen Fotos finde ich nirgendwo einen Hinweis auf diese Skate&Rail Routen. Waren die mal ausgeschildert? Wenn ja, w... commented 2025-09-13 07:42:18 UTC by GerdP ♦2,767 |
| 171862537 (Comments: 1) | JakubS (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429454540 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-09-13 07:40:44 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171783977 (Comments: 3) | AlanFR4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please remember that keys should be in British English and spaces should be avoided. In your case, the keys phone and phone:emergency would be appropriate. commented 2025-09-13 07:26:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171860661 (Comments: 1) | Ted Pottage (Discussed changesets: 12) | Access visit by #SurreyCoalition staff and members commented 2025-09-13 06:58:52 UTC by Ted Pottage ♦24 |
| 171769790 (Comments: 2) | Aloade (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, c'est noté commented 2025-09-13 06:33:30 UTC by Aloade ♦7 |
| 171788026 (Comments: 1) | ruarimac24 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I just wanted to point out, in case you missed it, that there are several problems in this changeset as noted in the warnings above. I've removed several sections of duplicated cycleway which could have impacted on routing. I've not loo... commented 2025-09-13 06:16:57 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
| 171858562 (Comments: 2) | mothbelly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Whoops. Sorry about that. Thanks for letting me know! I'll fix this up soon when I'm at a computer so I don't accidentally make it worse somehow... I realised that I added the reference to the wrong bus stop (other side of the r... commented 2025-09-13 05:08:35 UTC by mothbelly ♦1 |
| 171532412 (Comments: 2) | Danil Moiseenko (Discussed changesets: 19) | Здравствуйте. Я понял, спасибо за замечание. commented 2025-09-13 04:21:38 UTC by Danil Moiseenko ♦16 |
| 171850116 (Comments: 1) | Baldest Doodler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, there's a bunch popping up. I added 3 on the southwest side of town commented 2025-09-13 03:54:17 UTC by d3phunk37 ♦1 |
| 171856827 (Comments: 1) | Calamity_Engine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Calamity_Engine, Welcome to OSM, and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. I'd like to point out that because our street names here are a little unusual, we have a wiki page with specific guidance: https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 03:31:42 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦46 |
| 169108352 (Comments: 2) | HerryCFPL (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm very sorry, I only saw your message now. I don't know why, but the system's emails have been classified as spam. What you said is very correct, I will correct it immediately. I should have accidentally made a mistake when I ... commented 2025-09-13 03:29:47 UTC by HerryCFPL ♦2 |
| 160152319 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 10) | Several months later, as a more experienced mapper, I now realize that this changeset was in error: micro-mapping of parking stalls is a real thing. Sorry! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171857575 commented 2025-09-13 03:06:48 UTC by pwbriggs ♦62 |
 | 171158569 (Comments: 2) | Quixlian (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hola CENTSOARER, Sabemos que el sistema de clasificación está diseñado para reflejar la estructura del sistema vial en su totalidad, por lo tanto, una avenida puede ser importante localmente, pero si no conecta con otras v... commented 2025-09-13 02:30:58 UTC by Quixlian ♦19 |
| 164049056 (Comments: 1) | dcsohl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, What was your thought process for mapping this as a mini roundabout? Did you survey it? I am just confused cos to my eye from driving though here it just seems like a standard mass roundabout with a significant (>6") raised central... commented 2025-09-13 02:18:46 UTC by RedEyedVireo ♦21 |
| 169799448 (Comments: 2) | PaPaMooSe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, If I don't get a response on this soon I am going to be left with no choice but to revert this edit as the edit to the nashua river is defiantly incorrect. I do belive that this was a mistake and if you would like help fixing this or ... commented 2025-09-13 02:10:26 UTC by RedEyedVireo ♦21 |
| 171845729 (Comments: 3) | Anthrosen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Which website did you use? If any object in your view belongs to a relation, you can select an object (like a tram stop), scroll down to the "Relations" section, and type the route's name or ref. commented 2025-09-13 02:01:17 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦79 |
| 171850387 (Comments: 1) | Circuit360 (Discussed changesets: 2) | First edit jitters, I get it. So the north building is Circuit360? What kind of business is this? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171850387 commented 2025-09-13 01:14:20 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171850458 (Comments: 1) | Circuit360 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is the email address still circuit360okc@gmail.com? Is the phone number still +1 813 444 5879? Also be aware that the name tag should only contain the name, not the branch. There's a branch tag for that. --- ... commented 2025-09-13 01:10:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171854290 (Comments: 1) | norrellb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the update! You can find more that hasn't been updated recently in the StreetComplete app on Android and iOS. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2025-09-13 01:09:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171738692 (Comments: 1) | Higashimado (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您好！ G239已经有了相应的关系(8086432) 建议将新239关系合并至老关系中防止冲突 commented 2025-09-13 00:54:58 UTC by yzuio ♦3 |
| 171855882 (Comments: 1) | ftrebien (Discussed changesets: 36) | Os changesets desfeitos são os seguintes: 171052036, 171052013, 171051990, 171051954, 171051856, 171051842, 171051821, 171051810, 171051796, 171051786, 171051772, 171051734, 171051715, 171051698, 171051678, 171051665, 171051654, 171051642, 170... commented 2025-09-13 00:37:27 UTC by ftrebien ♦169 |
| 164906440 (Comments: 11) | ViewStreet (Discussed changesets: 8) | Εγώ έρχομαι μετά από καιρό, επειδή τώρα το πρόσεξα, να &rh... commented 2025-09-13 00:36:53 UTC by jimkats ♦74 |
| 171805308 (Comments: 1) | dechandler (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Include the tag addr:city=Tacoma when adding addresses to buildings and businesses. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171805308 commented 2025-09-13 00:24:26 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171765876 (Comments: 2) | Simon1595 (Discussed changesets: 4) | User is blocked pending acknowledgement of changeset comments ~ OSM Data Working Group commented 2025-09-13 00:16:29 UTC by mizmay ♦1 |
 | 82316808 (Comments: 1) | NKA (Discussed changesets: 140) | En røys med småveier har fått maxspeed=50 her. Fint om du rydder opp selv. Eksempel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782207245 commented 2025-09-12 23:56:08 UTC by gormur ♦120 |
| 171806018 (Comments: 2) | Thebro7her (Discussed changesets: 1) | Scusami, ma non sapevo. Grazie ne terrò presente per i prossimi update. commented 2025-09-12 23:20:17 UTC by Thebro7her ♦1 |
| 171835881 (Comments: 2) | HashFerret (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wonder if we can use https://deflock.me/map#map=12/40.738933/-111.860218 commented 2025-09-12 22:50:29 UTC by mvexel ♦145 |
| 171811375 (Comments: 1) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 11) | this parking seems to be for the court house so I am unsure if access=private is correct in this case, can you prove that this is only for employees or something, or could it also be for those that are defendants etc because then it may not be privat... commented 2025-09-12 22:47:53 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171811272 (Comments: 1) | Metauro (Discussed changesets: 5) | based on on the aerial imagery this looks like more of a parking you pay for not for any particular business so I am unsure if private is the best value. commented 2025-09-12 22:45:22 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171740319 (Comments: 1) | Iwaku (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was the one who added the Tram Tag, i will gladly understand if that was incorrect, however, when i saw that road, i saw Rails (now unused) in the road indicative of a past use as a tram way commented 2025-09-12 22:13:41 UTC by CharliStarry ♦1 |
| 171822794 (Comments: 1) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, Why did you retag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/959770729 from a riding arena (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian) to an equestrian centre (leisure=horse_riding)? To me, this area looks like a riding arena, so the previous tagging was correc... commented 2025-09-12 22:09:16 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦801 |
| 171851712 (Comments: 1) | inserteunnombreaqui (Discussed changesets: 2) | waos.... estoy cansado XD commented 2025-09-12 21:23:55 UTC by inserteunnombreaqui ♦6 |
| 171843146 (Comments: 4) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Yep.. Andere layers renderen shrubbery wel. commented 2025-09-12 21:00:03 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171847911 (Comments: 1) | Rhamear (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding details to the map. Two important things to point out: 1. Please don't copy from Google Maps. It's against their terms of service and against the rules of OSM. It looks like the details for at lea... commented 2025-09-12 20:57:06 UTC by iandees ♦736 |
| 171642939 (Comments: 1) | the_jandroid (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ah cool, ich kannte bisher nur die am Gasteig :) commented 2025-09-12 20:56:04 UTC by Rainero ♦590 |
| 171843775 (Comments: 5) | Frieder Knabe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Sven, danke dir für die Links 👍 – die kenne ich, die Waldbrand-App ist tatsächlich bei uns im Fablab mit entstanden. Die Bearbeitungen, bzw. der aufgefallene Fehler mit den fehlenden oder unvollständigen Na... commented 2025-09-12 20:52:38 UTC by Frieder Knabe ♦2 |
| 171796788 (Comments: 1) | Waldrenner (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi :) zu deinen Ladesäulen: Stand der Diskussion bei OSM ist, dass zwei Ladesäulen in einer Ladestation zusammengefasst werden, so wie mehrere Zapfsäulen eine Tankstelle ergeben. Vergleiche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.... commented 2025-09-12 20:52:35 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171850629 (Comments: 1) | El ArquiPachuca (Discussed changesets: 9) | QUEDO BONITO commented 2025-09-12 20:49:49 UTC by El ArquiPachuca ♦12 |
| 171817330 (Comments: 1) | GEWOBA Denker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Guten Tag, diesen Änderungssatz sowie den Änderungssatz 171820451 habe ich vorläufig rückgängig gemacht. Ich bitte um eine Begründung für die Änderungen. Beste Grüße, Romwriter commented 2025-09-12 20:43:29 UTC by Romwriter ♦199 |
| 171798528 (Comments: 1) | Waldrenner (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi :) ist dort nun etwas anderes? Oder wie sieht das Ladenlokal nun aus? cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171798528 commented 2025-09-12 20:38:36 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171800482 (Comments: 1) | Roxy5958 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bazı silinen yollar hava görüntüsünde hala gözüküyor. Yolların olmadığına emin misiniz? Yollardan biri: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850752402 commented 2025-09-12 20:33:37 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171845392 (Comments: 1) | Waldrenner (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi :) dieser Weg hat nun access=no agricultural=yes bicycle=yes motor_vehicle=agricultural das ist nicht gut. Kannst du dir das nochmal ansehen und ggf. mal mit der Beschilderung vergleichen? Grüße<... commented 2025-09-12 20:31:57 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171508314 (Comments: 1) | Waskowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Waskowski und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Du hast das "Rathaus Babelsberg" als "Rathaus" eingetragen. Bei OpenStreetMap kartieren wir die Dinge so, wie sie jetzt gerade sind. Dies ist kein Rathaus mehr, in ... commented 2025-09-12 20:31:21 UTC by hfs ♦66 |
| 171657410 (Comments: 2) | Wild Coast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was there last week, not sure when it happened. commented 2025-09-12 20:23:25 UTC by Wild Coast ♦1 |
| 171814219 (Comments: 1) | Vigilence (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429164939 is not a horse riding centre (leisure=horse_riding), it looks like a horse riding arena, similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958775278#map=19/47.524219/7.536824&layers=P (leisure=pitch ... commented 2025-09-12 20:22:41 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦801 |
| 171830011 (Comments: 1) | senkus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lütfen yolları kısaltma olmadan ekleyin. commented 2025-09-12 20:14:14 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171834665 (Comments: 1) | f4phantom (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yollar fiziksel olarak bir engel ile ayrılmış mı? Neden o şekilde haritalandırdınız? Ayrıca var olan yolu kaldırmak yerine tekrar düzenleyebilirsiniz hem de böylece elementin geçmişini korumuş olursunuz. https://wi... commented 2025-09-12 20:10:20 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171848705 (Comments: 1) | N_Inman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi N_Inman, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. T... commented 2025-09-12 20:07:05 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171828903 (Comments: 4) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 36) | ya, I did hope it was only a description typo ;D thx commented 2025-09-12 19:58:27 UTC by Yog Sot ♦286 |
| 157592381 (Comments: 3) | Frédéric Brière (Discussed changesets: 5) | Super, merci! 👍 commented 2025-09-12 19:58:18 UTC by jfd553 ♦58 |
| 168862137 (Comments: 1) | Soozcat (Discussed changesets: 2) | haha, it took a while for somebody to notice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414386787 (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4952611). But please don't map made-up things in the future, we don't want to start a trend of vandalism. commented 2025-09-12 19:48:57 UTC by pwbriggs ♦62 |
| 150754248 (Comments: 1) | Choubi 24 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, J'ai supprimé les chemins qui n'ont aucune existence sur le terrain. Pour faire des cartes personnalisées, merci d'utiliser uMap :) commented 2025-09-12 19:37:06 UTC by gendy54 ♦597 |
| 162076341 (Comments: 2) | jaap de vries (Discussed changesets: 131) | Hoi Jaap, zou je mijn vraag kunnen beantwoorden? commented 2025-09-12 19:25:39 UTC by dikkeknodel ♦286 |
| 164520731 (Comments: 1) | qwertz100 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Baustelle noch nicht fertig? commented 2025-09-12 19:05:39 UTC by chris66 ♦400 |
| 171178694 (Comments: 2) | Fijord (Discussed changesets: 48) | (der account war wohl an der gesamten Straße dran) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171178694 commented 2025-09-12 19:04:36 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 163829425 (Comments: 6) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 50) | Wege mit natural=ridge sind m.E. auch dann für ein schnelles Erfassen der Topographie sinnvoll, wenn ein Renderer Höhenlinien und Schummerung bietet. Der Kamm liefert eine gut erfassbare Information, welcher Teil der Topogrsphie "oben&... commented 2025-09-12 19:03:36 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦23 |
| 171816040 (Comments: 1) | Cornelia Keßler (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi hier war die Schreibweise, die du eingetragen hast schon als "official_name" erfasst. Das deutet stark darauf hin, dass es auf den Schildern vor Ort so steht, wie hier unter "name" erfasst war. Bitte frag in solch... commented 2025-09-12 19:03:34 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171544785 (Comments: 1) | lycc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo lycc, ich stolpere gerade über das Gelände des Pferdemarktes und es sieht so aus, als wärest du hauptverantwortlich für diese detaillierte Erfassung. Ich hätte zunächst Fragen: Wenn ich die Web... commented 2025-09-12 18:57:38 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171799415 (Comments: 4) | DocDirk (Discussed changesets: 4) | There's no need for bicycle=no as highway=footway auto negates bicycles commented 2025-09-12 18:54:47 UTC by DaveF ♦1,579 |
| 171800309 (Comments: 4) | Anazaar (Discussed changesets: 31) | Opowiadasz farmazony. Tu chodzi o to, że nigdzie nie ma tak, że nagle kończy się droga o wyższej kategorii na rondzie. Każda droga musi łączyć się z inną drogą o równej lub wyższej kategorii. Są od tego wyjątki, ale na pewno nie... commented 2025-09-12 18:51:30 UTC by pavvv ♦550 |
| 171791761 (Comments: 1) | dktue (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi da du hier kein VZ angegeben hast muss ich mal nachfragen: Auf dem letzten vorhandenen Straßenbild, welches zugegebenermaßen schon gut 4 Jahre alt ist, ist am Zugang zur Weiherstr. KEIN VZ zu erkennen, welches Fahrräder ver... commented 2025-09-12 18:48:50 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171786655 (Comments: 1) | Frank Hein 666 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Frank :) bitte nicht persönlich nehmen und auch nicht als Kritik. Ich versuche nur zu helfen :) ALso: Wir haben den Grundsatz "keep the history" und deshalb wäre hier der korrekte Weg geseen, den vorhandenen We... commented 2025-09-12 18:43:43 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171655340 (Comments: 1) | Haeape1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Según las guías de mapeo de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk_link), las vías marcadas como "link" (de cualquier categoría), no se deben marcar con el tag "name=*" si... commented 2025-09-12 18:40:10 UTC by Facalderonm ♦38 |
| 165555471 (Comments: 2) | atervn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moi, Joo, ihan oikeassa olet, pahoittelut tästä. Ehkä ajatettelin tuossa, että koska tuossa on tuo jalkakäytävä piirretty niin tielle voisi laittaa tuon foot=no. Mutta tosiaan ainakin tuolla Varalankadun p&au... commented 2025-09-12 18:39:46 UTC by atervn ♦2 |
| 171610126 (Comments: 1) | Haeape1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola, según la guía de mapeo de Colombia (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear), en el país NO se usa el tag "highway=motorway", siendo la más alta "highway=trunk". As&i... commented 2025-09-12 18:35:32 UTC by Facalderonm ♦38 |
| 154618516 (Comments: 2) | MicDK (Discussed changesets: 68) | Hej Niels, Du har helt ret. Jeg kan i dag ikke huske eksakt, hvorfor jeg taggede hastigheden forkert. Bare at jeg kørte gennem Birkende og opdagede en eller anden fejl i forbindelse med ensretningerne omkring kirken. Tak for rett... commented 2025-09-12 18:30:41 UTC by MicDK ♦67 |
 | 171760431 (Comments: 1) | GLOWBOSS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. The experience will be even better for users if the map also shows details like the... commented 2025-09-12 18:14:00 UTC by Comino ♦140 |
| 143499941 (Comments: 2) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 112) | Neviemn. Mozno ZBGIS alebo INSPIRE data? commented 2025-09-12 18:12:17 UTC by *Martin* ♦647 |
| 171470711 (Comments: 2) | Mohamadbidad (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/171471587 commented 2025-09-12 18:03:49 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171470697 (Comments: 2) | blueridgeautoga (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171479980 commented 2025-09-12 18:02:54 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171471657 (Comments: 2) | JenAtoZPartyRental (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171844688 commented 2025-09-12 18:02:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171483199 (Comments: 2) | atlantavideoprod1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171576455 commented 2025-09-12 18:01:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171484746 (Comments: 2) | Iron_Miller (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171844644 commented 2025-09-12 18:00:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171507141 (Comments: 1) | Madina2828282 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Аквапарк в многоэтажке? commented 2025-09-12 17:49:31 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,066 |
| 171838185 (Comments: 1) | Alexei-1984 (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted - names are already present in the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171844199 commented 2025-09-12 17:49:25 UTC by yelisey90 ♦166 |
| 171838476 (Comments: 1) | Alexei-1984 (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted - names are already present in the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171844199 commented 2025-09-12 17:49:25 UTC by yelisey90 ♦166 |
| 171646461 (Comments: 2) | Cato_d_Ae (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ja, das ist auf jeden Fall besser, die Option hat mir noch in StreetComplete gefehlt, danke fürs Anpassen. Gruß Cato commented 2025-09-12 17:48:16 UTC by Cato_d_Ae ♦1 |
| 171811705 (Comments: 2) | vardio (Discussed changesets: 1) | יש שם חלל ענק לא נכנסתי commented 2025-09-12 17:45:42 UTC by vardio ♦1 |
| 167511776 (Comments: 1) | smarties (Discussed changesets: 86) | Hi, ich staune über deinen Fleiß, was die Benennung der Wassergräben in der Region betrifft. Wo bekommt man diese Daten her? Die Gräben sind ja nicht beschildert. Oft sind es zwei Nummern, eine davon in Klammern: Was ist die Bede... commented 2025-09-12 17:45:37 UTC by urk ♦12 |
| 122405129 (Comments: 4) | Martinbike_rnk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Laut Strava heatmap werden inzwischen einige der fraglichen Wege wieder massiv begangen. Habe einen Hinweis erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4958852 commented 2025-09-12 17:30:47 UTC by whb ♦627 |
| 170454304 (Comments: 1) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 288) | Pasibus już otwarty, ma drive-thru commented 2025-09-12 17:17:47 UTC by qaz789 ♦20 |
| 145855568 (Comments: 2) | PluMGMK (Discussed changesets: 12) | Must be... I'm guessing I had circuits=4 on an earlier rev and forgot to change it. The real problem is that I was too lazy to map the individual circuits, which I've been meaning to rectify for well over a year now! 😦 commented 2025-09-12 17:09:35 UTC by PluMGMK ♦11 |
| 171754943 (Comments: 2) | yawp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Neghreheb, Danke für den Hinweis! Ist schon lange her dass ich etwas bearbeitet habe, muss mich erst wieder einlesen. LG! commented 2025-09-12 17:00:28 UTC by yawp ♦1 |
| 161928938 (Comments: 1) | benoitdd (Discussed changesets: 30) | Les travaux ont l'air d'avoir avancé et les données modifiées. Tu peux vérifier la conformité ? commented 2025-09-12 16:58:33 UTC by Lejun ♦497 |
| 171841984 (Comments: 1) | Patchanka (Discussed changesets: 41) | voir discussion ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171832094 commented 2025-09-12 16:52:13 UTC by Patchanka ♦399 |
 | 171804435 (Comments: 1) | Mike Ortega (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Mike Ortega, He estado siguiendo desde lejos (estoy en Guatemala) los avances de la Carretera Litoral del Pacífico con mucha expectativa. He notado que recientemente ha pasado de ser una carretera en `construcción` a ser una... commented 2025-09-12 16:49:58 UTC by JAAS ♦82 |
| 171841138 (Comments: 2) | SomeoneElse2 (Discussed changesets: 61) | I've added an untagged way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429277102 and added it back to each of the relations. This possibly wasn't the most efficient way of doing it, but it did work. Unfortunately, the iD editor is not good at sp... commented 2025-09-12 16:47:29 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦460 |
| 171792958 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmap_user27496017 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Phone number should be input without dashes. I've fixed here commented 2025-09-12 16:42:39 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦179 |
| 171839206 (Comments: 1) | Damian05 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-09-12 16:41:14 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171799292 (Comments: 2) | plamen (Discussed changesets: 35) | Yes, should be building:levels. commented 2025-09-12 16:28:57 UTC by plamen ♦73 |
| 171826781 (Comments: 1) | whb (Discussed changesets: 37) | Danke schön fürs Korrigieren der Adressen an den Gebäuden. commented 2025-09-12 16:11:48 UTC by AlexSpritze ♦20 |
| 171786411 (Comments: 1) | dcskobuffs (Discussed changesets: 41) | Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery. commented 2025-09-12 16:10:20 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦64 |
| 171763081 (Comments: 5) | Mikhail Kuzin (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://i.postimg.cc/h47DvVq4/2025-09-12-21-55-55.png Two slashes actually change the tag, and therefore it is not used in the render, which suggests the structure of the roads. I use it the same way as comments in programming, temporarily ... commented 2025-09-12 15:59:02 UTC by Mikhail Kuzin ♦3 |
| 171821424 (Comments: 1) | Deftus (Discussed changesets: 1) | закрыт мост на ремонт!!!! commented 2025-09-12 15:55:59 UTC by Deftus ♦1 |
| 171813366 (Comments: 1) | Metauro (Discussed changesets: 5) | have you checked if any of the parking at this highschool is for student parking, because if there is access=private doesn't seem like the correct tag for the situation. commented 2025-09-12 15:54:05 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171813637 (Comments: 1) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 17) | these are clearly residential roads, just because there is parking along the road does not mean that it is a service road. commented 2025-09-12 15:51:48 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171795039 (Comments: 8) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 122) | Dzięki, tylko od razu drobna uwaga z góry, żeby przy złączaniu zachować ten z dłuższą historią :P commented 2025-09-12 15:50:43 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 171814188 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 10) | have you checked if any of the ap0rking lots at this highschool allow student parking because it any do then access=private would be inaccurate. commented 2025-09-12 15:49:08 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 145813242 (Comments: 4) | JamJar II (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ha - so it does (I didn't spot that). I'd just remove the "footway=sidewalk" altogether. commented 2025-09-12 15:48:14 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 171799019 (Comments: 2) | Bąbel (Discussed changesets: 267) | Po co dublujesz adresy? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4414401692 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429064344 commented 2025-09-12 15:45:51 UTC by Szymson ♦394 |
| 171817279 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 10) | are you sure that this parking is not for LoanDepot Park, because if it is then I am not sure that access=private would be appropriate. commented 2025-09-12 15:41:36 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171832699 (Comments: 1) | Pauwel02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Tip... Probeer het gebied van je edits wat kleiner te houden, MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-12 15:41:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171823735 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 10) | if you look at the imagery this is a oneway commented 2025-09-12 15:28:11 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171827727 (Comments: 1) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at their website I do not think that access=no is warranted https://hachidoggrooming.com/ commented 2025-09-12 15:25:50 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171503963 (Comments: 2) | Zilvervisje (Discussed changesets: 21) | Straatnaam heb ik verwijderd commented 2025-09-12 15:21:32 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 146137699 (Comments: 2) | Mareček (Discussed changesets: 5) | @Klerik7 Opravené, dostali sme report od používateľa #mapycom commented 2025-09-12 15:16:32 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦30 |
| 170793035 (Comments: 6) | IIVQ (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hello IIVQ, Looks good for me! Thank you and best regards, Patchi. commented 2025-09-12 15:14:19 UTC by Patchi ♦135 |
| 171828631 (Comments: 1) | M1TAXI (Discussed changesets: 4) | lol, nie są skończone i nie są otwarte xD commented 2025-09-12 15:04:50 UTC by Yog Sot ♦286 |
| 171302155 (Comments: 1) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 168) | Tusinde tak! Hilsen Lars - Fanø MTB commented 2025-09-12 15:04:03 UTC by Lars Reinholdt Christensen ♦1 |
| 168491181 (Comments: 3) | fudoreaper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for a quick fix! And congrats on following up on comment, especially if you were unaware they exist at all! commented 2025-09-12 14:54:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171836080 (Comments: 1) | TheCornCollector (Discussed changesets: 9) | Kleine correctie in changeset beschrijving: de gebouwen in kwestie zijn voornamelijk schuurtjes niet alle gebouwen. commented 2025-09-12 14:51:02 UTC by TheCornCollector ♦7 |
| 171581756 (Comments: 1) | Jean-Pierre Rondeau (Discussed changesets: 36) | Bonjour Jean-Pierre, J'ai constaté quelque-chose qui n'allait pas dans tes contributions liés aux arrêts, en effet, tu as pour habitude, de mettre un node [highway=bus_stop] + [public_transport=platform] sur les c... commented 2025-09-12 14:48:25 UTC by Valenting01 ♦10 |
| 170146551 (Comments: 1) | iatur (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-09-12 14:43:06 UTC by dypa ♦131 |
| 169991218 (Comments: 1) | pesec (Discussed changesets: 87) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-09-12 14:39:29 UTC by dypa ♦131 |
| 169822248 (Comments: 1) | terminalof (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-09-12 14:37:42 UTC by dypa ♦131 |
| 171442528 (Comments: 2) | Simonxl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Simonxl, deine Änderungen im Gipfelbereich wurde von mir rückgängig gemacht. Bitte aber meinen Hinweis bzgl. Luftbilder zukünftig beachten. Gruß Bergfrei commented 2025-09-12 14:35:25 UTC by bergfrei ♦44 |
| 171799659 (Comments: 3) | Art4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke commented 2025-09-12 14:30:12 UTC by aixbrick ♦854 |
| 171771522 (Comments: 1) | Abulfazl Safdari (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2bws. What is the mean of the tag ض = residential. Did you mean building = residential? commented 2025-09-12 14:28:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171809622 (Comments: 1) | Kraklord (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Kraklord, can you verify if you placed the ATM at the right position? commented 2025-09-12 14:28:09 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦97 |
| 169812830 (Comments: 1) | d7pek (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-09-12 14:27:51 UTC by dypa ♦131 |
| 171738395 (Comments: 1) | kuporod (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-09-12 14:27:08 UTC by dypa ♦131 |
| 171085235 (Comments: 2) | man-nurmburg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo man-nurmburg, hier wurde festgestellt, dass es das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425316628 nicht mehr gibt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4955397 Du hast es aber vor zwei Wochen neu erfasst. War das ein Fehler bz... commented 2025-09-12 14:12:02 UTC by pyram ♦508 |
| 171834477 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 450) | The ridiculously large bounding box is because the TPEP is drawn as one way: osm.org/way/94759467 . Actual edit was along the road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70947577#map=15/54.17595/-1.81546&layers=H commented 2025-09-12 14:07:36 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 171831473 (Comments: 1) | mecknr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is there a reason you removed the "Spider Social Trail"? Looks like there is a good amount of activity there in the last 12 months that indicates it actually exists on the ground. You have a new account and might ... commented 2025-09-12 13:53:06 UTC by MassCartog ♦152 |
| 171636462 (Comments: 2) | Sasummsumm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah ok :D. Aber in dem Fall wird das nicht nur als Parkplatz genutzt vom Besitzer, sondern auch als Holzplatz oder so, schätze ich. Also nicht wirklich ein dezidierter Parkplatz. Dachte mir, wenn der eh keinem was nützt, ist die Info üb... commented 2025-09-12 13:48:12 UTC by Sasummsumm ♦1 |
| 171833204 (Comments: 1) | zabop (Discussed changesets: 7) | Details on solar park: https://i.imgur.com/mFKuTKC.jpeg commented 2025-09-12 13:47:56 UTC by zabop ♦16 |
| 170615606 (Comments: 7) | santon (Discussed changesets: 37) | Fair enough. Personally, I'm just wary of using that tag. It seems like it could quickly become a slippery slope toward tagging lots of things as attractions. commented 2025-09-12 13:47:09 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦97 |
| 171690260 (Comments: 6) | keepright! ler (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ooh, now I get it, the main issue is the clockwise/anticlockwise confusion! commented 2025-09-12 13:42:37 UTC by keepright! ler ♦36 |
| 171823391 (Comments: 2) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 51) | Your comment seems misguided, the changeset here is not about through-traffic restrictions. If there are such restrictions, the correct tag you could add is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vehicle%3Ddestination This changeset is... commented 2025-09-12 13:33:49 UTC by multimob ♦75 |
| 171832728 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 349) | comment reshaped from bgt omtrekgericht commented 2025-09-12 13:28:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171831251 (Comments: 1) | joris_oorschot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-12 13:24:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171593587 (Comments: 1) | Peter Olesen (Discussed changesets: 1) | No need for the description "Byens Poter is a Pet Supplies store." since that is already implied by the shop=pet tag. commented 2025-09-12 13:24:01 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦97 |
| 171828975 (Comments: 1) | Jes31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-12 13:22:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171688810 (Comments: 3) | f4phantom (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merhabalar, ben Çorum-Osmancık Yolunda bulunan bazı hatalar için düzenlemelere gerek duyuyorum. Ben bu yoldan bilmiyorum kaç kere geçtim ama şuan hala yapımı devam eden bir yol. Bahsettiğiniz gibi secondary'... commented 2025-09-12 13:20:54 UTC by f4phantom ♦3 |
| 171638623 (Comments: 1) | flides (Discussed changesets: 1) | Stien (Linjestreng: 1427985811) slutter ikke til vejen i den vestlige ende. Er det med vilje (kan man ikke gå ud på vejen)? commented 2025-09-12 13:18:06 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦97 |
| 171085571 (Comments: 3) | VladMorb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! We use British English for our keys and definitely avoid spaces in the key. Incidentally, the key ref:FR:NAF has already been used 41,047 times. In my opinion, it is questionable whether a classification of the number of employees should be co... commented 2025-09-12 13:08:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171815269 (Comments: 1) | Camille Jeannin (Discussed changesets: 26) | Bonjour, Contrairement à ce suggère l'éditeur iD, il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter crop=grape sur les parcelles de vignes. Ce tag est redondant car par définition la vigne produit du raisin. |
| 126044455 (Comments: 3) | Yaaaaaaaa (Discussed changesets: 51) | Encore moi pour le même changeset : rue du Rempart, il y a plusieurs node pour le numéro de maison "82" (exemple 10015550432 et ceux autour). Vus les numéros en face et autour, je pense qu'il y a un problème. commented 2025-09-12 12:46:18 UTC by LudovicG ♦76 |
| 171829870 (Comments: 1) | rle32795 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Crossing type sourced from local knowledge. commented 2025-09-12 12:35:47 UTC by rle32795 ♦25 |
| 75573389 (Comments: 4) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 200) | Szia! Kecskehegy városrészhez mi a forrásod? Régi térképeken, helytörténeti oldalakon se látom, hogy tényleg létezne-e ilyen nevű városrész. Palota&uacu... commented 2025-09-12 12:23:00 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 171343139 (Comments: 4) | nig82 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hola nig82, es una buena práctica en OSM responder a los comentarios y hacer uno mismo las correcciones cuando es advertido. En vista de tu habitual inacción he procedido a hacer las correcciones. Con la gran cantidad de errores que ... commented 2025-09-12 12:18:32 UTC by MarinoBM ♦103 |
| 161571109 (Comments: 2) | dbsus (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo Michael, danke für den Hinweis. Das ist wahrscheinlich "durchgerutscht". Ist korrigiert. Dem dritten Fahrkartenautomaten im blauen Erscheinungsbild (Bus, S, U usw.) konnte kein Branding zugeordnet werden. Grü&szli... commented 2025-09-12 12:06:15 UTC by dbsus ♦12 |
| 171779612 (Comments: 3) | victorelgueta (Discussed changesets: 9) | Si, estoy en el chat de telegram. commented 2025-09-12 12:01:21 UTC by victorelgueta ♦6 |
| 171828134 (Comments: 1) | MichałNowak (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-09-12 12:01:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 154705298 (Comments: 1) | TLIcGCxsJUGm0GIIL28i (Discussed changesets: 2) | Guten Tag, stimmt das bicycle=no hier wirklich? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174904021/history Viele Grüße whb commented 2025-09-12 11:53:20 UTC by whb ♦627 |
| 154138637 (Comments: 1) | TLIcGCxsJUGm0GIIL28i (Discussed changesets: 2) | Guten Tag, stimmt das bicycle=no hier wirklich? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40237306/history Viele Grüße whb commented 2025-09-12 11:51:40 UTC by whb ♦627 |
| 171823520 (Comments: 1) | DnaX (Discussed changesets: 30) | Grazie! commented 2025-09-12 11:43:17 UTC by AwFi ♦36 |
| 171824588 (Comments: 1) | Korneeldebaene (Discussed changesets: 2) | Don’t forget to keep tags in sync. 30 km/h is the default urban speed in Brussels whereas 50 km/h is the exception. "source:maxspeed" is used for that purpose. You can not just change the maxspeed tag and ignore the rest. ... commented 2025-09-12 11:42:30 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,544 |
| 171826057 (Comments: 1) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Je zou over een paar dagen het effect wel zien. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=52.0317207&lon=5.5335413&zoom=20 gr eggie commented 2025-09-12 11:33:20 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171827225 (Comments: 1) | luschi (Discussed changesets: 103) | fixed name, tunnel:name + bridge:name along Strada Statale 47 della Valsugana commented 2025-09-12 11:32:30 UTC by luschi ♦419 |
| 171777502 (Comments: 1) | AlexSpritze (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich habe dann noch die Straßennamen bei den Adressen entsprechend korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171826781 commented 2025-09-12 11:22:36 UTC by whb ♦627 |
| 156545569 (Comments: 1) | Lucinux85500 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, pour la rue Lancelot du Lac il manque : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43450940 (vérifié sur le cadastre). commented 2025-09-12 11:08:14 UTC by trial ♦922 |
| 171330127 (Comments: 1) | Testoofficial (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Testoofficial, willkommen bei OSM und danke für Deine Beiträge. Frage, warum änderst Du die Fläche des Löschzug Seelscheid vollumfänglich in ein Gebäude. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=... commented 2025-09-12 10:54:22 UTC by pitfire ♦680 |
| 171806154 (Comments: 1) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 381) | Hi, could you check your recent edits? It's "turn:lanes", not "turn_lanes". commented 2025-09-12 10:44:22 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 171813837 (Comments: 1) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 40) | Correction: Edited the Hermosa-San Simon-Duhat-Balintawak Transmission Line (currently Hermosa-Duhat-Balintawak Transmission Line). commented 2025-09-12 10:41:26 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦26 |
| 171784694 (Comments: 2) | martin_34kaiser (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi and thanks for your correction. I will try to take care of that difference in the future. BR commented 2025-09-12 10:37:31 UTC by martin_34kaiser ♦1 |
| 171788984 (Comments: 1) | Josh Grossman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Please be careful and listen to warning and errors in the id editor before saving. This changest breaks geometry. Thanks! I will have to revert. Please recreate a new changeset without errors in geometry. commented 2025-09-12 10:22:32 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦403 |
| 171789892 (Comments: 2) | Leahcvar1234 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I am reverting. Please add back the restaurant separately. commented 2025-09-12 10:18:44 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦403 |
| 171788918 (Comments: 2) | Leahcvar1234 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I will revert this changset. commented 2025-09-12 10:16:51 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦403 |
| 171823083 (Comments: 1) | STRANNIK_MINSK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Адреса и улицы должны писаться по опред. образцу и на бел. мове. commented 2025-09-12 10:09:33 UTC by HantDX ♦17 |
| 171784990 (Comments: 2) | Ced_Th (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ced_Th: We have a question for your local knowledge. This part had 2 lanes: one for cars and a bus lane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813425808 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672465093 You changed it as a single-lane road. N... commented 2025-09-12 10:04:14 UTC by multimob ♦75 |
| 125382039 (Comments: 2) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 122) | Dojazd jest przez ul. Tadeusza Kościuszki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/213860617 commented 2025-09-12 09:55:59 UTC by Anas masuris ♦127 |
| 171822504 (Comments: 1) | Negreheb (Discussed changesets: 24) | Sardigna, not sicily 🤦 commented 2025-09-12 09:52:14 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 171821217 (Comments: 1) | Iván Caparrós (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola, para los "s/n" en addr:housenumber, disponemos del tag "nohousenumber"="yes" dispones de más información en osm.wiki/ES:Key:nohousenumber y https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nohouse... commented 2025-09-12 09:47:39 UTC by aTarom ♦795 |
| 171817430 (Comments: 1) | GeoManiack (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo GeoManiack, willkommen bei OSM und danke für das Eintragen Deines lokalen Wissens. Allerdings bietet OSM unfassendere Möglichkeiten. Ich Habe Deine "Touristenatraktion" in eine Gedenktafel umgeändert und mit weit... commented 2025-09-12 09:36:49 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,324 |
| 156863796 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Baloo Uriza, I apologize for missing placement tags. Thank you for your insights. Best regards, Surander commented 2025-09-12 09:35:55 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦6 |
| 158205452 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Baloo Uriza, Thank you very much for explaining why you split the roads that I added. We will update our best practices mapping with these kinds of examples. Best regards, Surander commented 2025-09-12 09:31:14 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦6 |
 | 171718950 (Comments: 2) | JudaeanDesert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello muralito, Thank you for input. I will defer to your knowledge here and update the tagging. Have a good day. commented 2025-09-12 09:27:28 UTC by JudaeanDesert ♦1 |
| 171816614 (Comments: 1) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Nee...... Elk Kadaster plaatst op haar manier de nodes. Bezorgdiensten als DHL, PostNL e.d. zijn juist weer blij als alle adressen op een hoopje bij de hoofdingang liggen. Dan komt de routering beter uit. Vooral bij grote appartementsgebouwen.<... commented 2025-09-12 09:25:45 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171819944 (Comments: 1) | Thom RDSec (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thom.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaan de adresnode. Ik zal ook het oude adres herstellen. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-12 09:17:33 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171819696 (Comments: 1) | Thom RDSec (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Thom, Verhuizen kan, maar een adres zal dan toch echt hier hetzelfde blijven. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171819696 MVG eggie commented 2025-09-12 09:14:31 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171734164 (Comments: 1) | GeoManiack (Discussed changesets: 2) | gelöscht, da bereits vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38807356 commented 2025-09-12 09:10:25 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,324 |
 | 171809265 (Comments: 1) | I Am Smiling (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-09-12 09:08:21 UTC by Comino ♦140 |
| 118655043 (Comments: 3) | b-holdet (Discussed changesets: 72) | Det gør jeg. Ville bare tjekke, om du måske vidste noget andet om denne eller danske skovbegravelsespladser generelt, som lå bag den eksisterende tagging. commented 2025-09-12 08:53:56 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦97 |
| 171782218 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 872) | dankeschön commented 2025-09-12 08:48:16 UTC by pingsler ♦9 |
| 171795836 (Comments: 9) | Ouss_5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The Centre National d'Etudes et de Recherches Routières classified it as a national road, not a motorway, literally in 2025. See page 47 https://map.comptoir.net/maroc-reseau-routier-2025-01/docs/Atlas%20Routier%202024%20A3%20Janv%... commented 2025-09-12 08:46:29 UTC by ilias_ ♦249 |
| 171462278 (Comments: 2) | CasGroenigen (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hoi Leo, Ik snap wat je bedoelt, maar ik weet niet zeker of ik het hiermee eens ben. Alhoewel OSM "Map what's on the ground" toepast is dit best een vage uitdrukking, en kan je als community tot op zekere hoogte natuurli... commented 2025-09-12 08:36:16 UTC by CasGroenigen ♦44 |
| 171799788 (Comments: 3) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ah ja logisch ook natuurlijk. Dankjewel :) commented 2025-09-12 08:32:08 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 171815937 (Comments: 4) | Bdewit (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi, Tja dat Nieuw Groenhove is een gepasseerd station. Op de N3 staat op de bebording bij de afslag ook Wilgenwende. Daarom verwonderde het mij dat het park alsnog omgedoopt wordt. De naam staat nu alleen nog op de polygoon van het park... commented 2025-09-12 08:20:33 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 170894531 (Comments: 3) | Saaste (Discussed changesets: 1) | It is now fixed! commented 2025-09-12 08:13:15 UTC by Saaste ♦1 |
| 171815739 (Comments: 2) | Bdewit (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb deze doorgelezen. Dank voor de info!! commented 2025-09-12 08:11:37 UTC by Bdewit ♦2 |
 | 169007378 (Comments: 1) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 16) | This does really not render well on CyclOSM rendering due to this waterway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499633829 Is this really a waterway? commented 2025-09-12 08:11:28 UTC by b_mortgat ♦5 |
| 171796772 (Comments: 1) | Damian05 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Cześć, jakaś dziwna edycja Ci tutaj wyszła z tym węzłem: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/12903162341 - zamieniłeś sklep abc przy Chrobrego na automat DHL BOX przy Długosza (odległość między punktami to 1400m). To chyba jest jak... commented 2025-09-12 08:04:42 UTC by Marek-M ♦930 |
| 144859855 (Comments: 2) | AndySchulte (Discussed changesets: 115) | Hallo, Ich danke dir für deinen Hinweis. commented 2025-09-12 07:59:45 UTC by AndySchulte ♦100 |
| 171805272 (Comments: 2) | BVBVB (Discussed changesets: 2) | openingstijden aangepast commented 2025-09-12 07:43:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171572051 (Comments: 1) | Niconil (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2025-09-12 07:17:56 UTC by StC ♦324 |
| 171803353 (Comments: 2) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 120) | The data is from my contacts at the guesthouses. The exact location was explored, partly through the pictures I received from the operators. This is the case, for example, with 13137029632, where you can see the house on the aerial photo. Okay, &l... commented 2025-09-12 07:17:55 UTC by wegavision ♦66 |
| 171800387 (Comments: 1) | Yaroslava Tyler Morehouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please don#T existing objects from the map. You can add acces=private for private streets. I have already done it. commented 2025-09-12 07:06:06 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171797301 (Comments: 1) | Nononoeducationalpirpouses (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please move the camera on the correct side of the street. commented 2025-09-12 07:02:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171796848 (Comments: 1) | Piper Leigh Berry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please move restaurant The Manufactory to the correct building. (it isn't part of the street) commented 2025-09-12 07:00:55 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171814690 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 385) | Only resolved https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4957061 commented 2025-09-12 06:59:56 UTC by habi ♦1,883 |
| 161265386 (Comments: 1) | owo13owo (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure=pitch commented 2025-09-12 06:59:23 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦17 |
| 171797010 (Comments: 1) | Tyler Medley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I remove your speedlimit of 545 mph or 877.1 kmh. It's a bit too oversized for an asphalt road. commented 2025-09-12 06:58:17 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171800891 (Comments: 1) | MaxMaps337 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6738898866 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-09-12 06:48:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 161773087 (Comments: 1) | セコイア (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure=pitch commented 2025-09-12 06:40:05 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦17 |
| 171806768 (Comments: 1) | Totokid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/10010986741, https://www.osm.org/node/10010986742 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the nodes back to the original position. commented 2025-09-12 06:31:45 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171756636 (Comments: 6) | hangy (Discussed changesets: 4) | Erstmal danke .. btw. - die Anzeige der Lizenzierung klappt zumindest bei der historic map auch ohne explizite Angabe commented 2025-09-12 06:31:20 UTC by tux67 ♦1,961 |
| 171321100 (Comments: 1) | Own Oh (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531608394 psv.ie appears to be a private busines,s unconnected to the Carriage Office commented 2025-09-12 06:25:35 UTC by VictorIE ♦933 |
| 171724347 (Comments: 1) | Phybbyemu (Discussed changesets: 10) | 嘉善县为何作为浙江省关系subarea成员？ commented 2025-09-12 06:19:35 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦8 |
| 171777197 (Comments: 2) | Rafcio202 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Widzę też, że cała działa została otagowana jako budynek. Ewidetnie trzeba to poprawić. commented 2025-09-12 06:17:43 UTC by JakubS ♦13 |
| 171696212 (Comments: 1) | Biochembob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! I was just curious how you were aware of the new segment between US 41 and US 60 opened to traffic and was designated as KY 3690? commented 2025-09-12 06:13:48 UTC by OrdinaryScarlett ♦13 |
| 171497125 (Comments: 2) | Max1234-ITA (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ciao, ho eseguito il revert dei toponimi da me inseriti. -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171679082 Buon proseguimento! Max commented 2025-09-12 06:13:13 UTC by Max1234-ITA ♦16 |
| 171607210 (Comments: 2) | Max1234-ITA (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ciao, ho eseguito il revert dei toponimi da me inseriti. -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171679082 Buon proseguimento! Max commented 2025-09-12 06:13:08 UTC by Max1234-ITA ♦16 |
| 171679082 (Comments: 2) | Max1234-ITA (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ciao, ho eseguito il revert dei toponimi da me inseriti. -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171679082 Buon proseguimento! Max commented 2025-09-12 06:13:03 UTC by Max1234-ITA ♦16 |
| 171619895 (Comments: 6) | Max1234-ITA (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ciao, ho eseguito il revert dei toponimi da me inseriti. Buon proseguimento! Max commented 2025-09-12 06:12:54 UTC by Max1234-ITA ♦16 |
| 167216625 (Comments: 1) | javbw (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch commented 2025-09-12 05:58:20 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦17 |
| 146384781 (Comments: 1) | postown (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch commented 2025-09-12 05:45:11 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦17 |
| 171552100 (Comments: 1) | Begavil84 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Begavil, you've been naming all the streets in towns across Puglia for months, even changing things that locals (including me) added just days earlier. May I know the source of your changes? commented 2025-09-12 05:44:51 UTC by corfede ♦307 |
| 171554842 (Comments: 1) | Begavil84 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Begavil, three months ago, a user changed the name of the ex SS91 and set that information to "old." What are the reasons for reversing that change today? commented 2025-09-12 05:41:29 UTC by corfede ♦307 |
| 171611905 (Comments: 10) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 153) | Thank you for pointing me on your proposal on the forum on that matter. I think that I understood most of it, but probably not well enough to explain how the combination of the tags area:highway / (area+highway) make sense according to your defini... commented 2025-09-12 05:24:31 UTC by ratrun ♦249 |
| 171803156 (Comments: 1) | londonmatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The church building is alreaddy mapped so I've added you new tags to it. OSM policy is "One feature, one OSM element", please see:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Regards Bernard. commented 2025-09-12 05:19:11 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
| 171754279 (Comments: 1) | Talip carad (Discussed changesets: 1) | You added a traffic sign. And you wrote "football field" in your changeset comment. Please write real comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-09-12 05:12:57 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦83 |
| 171740144 (Comments: 2) | morti3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi silversurfer 83, danke für den Hinweis, habe ich ergänzt. Gruß morti3 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171740144 commented 2025-09-12 05:10:25 UTC by morti3 ♦1 |
| 171795177 (Comments: 1) | DaveEnglishTeacher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM maps ground truth, what is physically present at a place, and it must be verifiable to others who pass by. So I wonder, is there actually a language school here or is it an office in the bungalow? I can see ... commented 2025-09-12 05:02:09 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
 | 171801731 (Comments: 1) | Jordan Chen (Discussed changesets: 1) | 已經有加full-name=快速公路五股土城線了 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171801731 commented 2025-09-12 04:59:13 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,480 |
| 171805750 (Comments: 1) | Jaller (Discussed changesets: 9) | Wow You work very hard, there are many landuse of rural area to map in Taiwan --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171805750 commented 2025-09-12 04:57:12 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,480 |
| 165529193 (Comments: 1) | soapynoscopy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12793777298/history I see that you edited a post office. Did the post office move? There is another one mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4538352289 commented 2025-09-12 04:54:56 UTC by VictorIE ♦933 |
| 171739636 (Comments: 1) | sayu23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por querer mejorar el mapa. Quitaste la etiqueta que dice que el camino es de doble sentido (de circulación), no pasa nada ya lo arraglé. Los otros valores que añadiste son implícit... commented 2025-09-12 04:34:44 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,590 |
| 168992177 (Comments: 3) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 153) | Der »way« an sich war richtig, nur das highway=primary an diesem war falsch. Verursacht durch Änderungssatz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168954710 Um es abzukürzen – hab’s repariert. |
| 171737078 (Comments: 1) | Ufones de Aliste (Discussed changesets: 1) | ¡Hola! Acuérdate de añadir títulos/comentarios en tus changesets para que la comunidad de OSM sepa el que estás editando. commented 2025-09-12 04:08:43 UTC by marcmarti ♦3 |
| 164044736 (Comments: 1) | deichzerleger (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo deichzerleger, Kannst du vielleicht mal bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4956801 vorbeischauen? Dort geht es um die (angeblich falsche) Position des hier von dir bearbeiten Orts. Ich war allerdings noch nie dort und kann daher nichts d... commented 2025-09-12 03:54:02 UTC by Tatfahren ♦288 |
| 171809261 (Comments: 1) | Indiaosm (Discussed changesets: 2) | कवठा बदनापूर commented 2025-09-12 02:49:50 UTC by Indiaosm ♦2 |
 | 171750706 (Comments: 2) | TxShiroxT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Saludos, estoy seguro, era una parada informal que ocupaban el espacio legitimo de metrobus y buses de paso, estacionaban en rayado rojo. Los buses de valle/coche le arrebataron el punto, y esta en tema legal ahora ellos commented 2025-09-12 02:30:57 UTC by TxShiroxT ♦1 |
| 171807266 (Comments: 1) | alexswilliams (Discussed changesets: 2) | Accidentally put two changes into one changeset. The original change that has had its source/description lost is: - Add further detail to Buxton McDonalds; sourced from a survey 2025-09-11, and gpx traces from my etrex uploaded to osm. commented 2025-09-12 01:25:02 UTC by alexswilliams ♦2 |
| 171807987 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 450) | The ridiculously large bounding box is because the TPEP is drawn as one way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94759467 . Actual edit was along the trail at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3878675#map=13/54.17067/-1.78562&layers=H . commented 2025-09-12 01:22:03 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 171666589 (Comments: 2) | Mawsons Lake (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for all of this advice - I'm learning about all these new features. I've made multiple changes/reversions to that original edit commented 2025-09-12 01:17:18 UTC by Mawsons Lake ♦3 |
| 166546525 (Comments: 4) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 18) | I have a very strong opinion that a clear corridor or embankment isn't grounds for a closed railway to be present in OSM, but that's a discussion for another time :) I went ahead and added building=train_station and abandoned=yes to ... commented 2025-09-12 01:16:13 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦87 |
| 171803854 (Comments: 1) | hayvenhurst-x (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171807656 commented 2025-09-12 00:50:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171805311 (Comments: 1) | bitsushi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-09-12 00:43:45 UTC by Comino ♦140 |
| 171438780 (Comments: 1) | dussaujot89 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour dusaujot89, J'ai vu que vous avez corrigé les routes sur la futur route LISA comme je vous l'avez suggéré en ajoutant le bon tag. C'est très bien. Mais vous avez coupé les routes existan... commented 2025-09-11 23:57:29 UTC by Le Petit Léo ♦8 |
| 171792628 (Comments: 2) | unzow (Discussed changesets: 19) | Well spotted; actually forgot to switch to shop=beauty - fixed now. commented 2025-09-11 23:49:20 UTC by unzow ♦21 |
| 171799396 (Comments: 1) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, it looks like this actually loops around to meet the main road again. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171799396 commented 2025-09-11 22:59:26 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,341 |
| 171801167 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 4) | The driveway also only connects to the sidewalk, and not to the road. Uber editors have continuously made these mistakes while editing in Australia recently, please review all your recent edits and ensure these issues are fixed. --- |
| 171432803 (Comments: 2) | Caleb NHVR (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks fortera, the note did cause some confusion when looking at vehicle access along Majors Road. Cheers, Caleb commented 2025-09-11 22:48:02 UTC by Caleb NHVR ♦11 |
| 170575435 (Comments: 1) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi und vielen Dank für deinen Edit. Das der überdachte Bürgersteig hier jetzt seperat gemappt ist ist tatsächlich ziemlich gut und macht was her. Für solche Gebäudepassagen solltest du aber covered=yes verwenden s... commented 2025-09-11 22:43:21 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 170575627 (Comments: 1) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, normalerweise ist es nicht notwendig solche direkt an den Fahrbahnen anliegenden Bürgersteigen seperat zu mappen, es soll aber so okay sein. Wenn du aber solche Bürgersteige mappst, dann nimm bitte von der Straße die entspreche... commented 2025-09-11 22:34:34 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 171788269 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 177) | puede haber fusion de la 23 con la 115 segun bondis a todo ritmo commented 2025-09-11 22:31:15 UTC by i2004 ♦141 |
| 171710934 (Comments: 2) | Ken Weaver (Discussed changesets: 2) | I didn't hear back from you so I changed the street back to the original configuration --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710934 commented 2025-09-11 22:27:28 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 164761697 (Comments: 5) | Omega933 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sprawa z dostępem od północy jest według miejscowych skomplikowana. Dodałem odpowiednie tagi. commented 2025-09-11 22:24:15 UTC by SpinOff ♦305 |
| 171777245 (Comments: 3) | jlov3001 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hi, the 10 small rectanges like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428966604, that you tagged with tourism=trail_riding_station, are problably just the 10 sandpaddock described on https://hippischcentrumlathum.nl/accommodatie/ and not trail riding... commented 2025-09-11 22:23:02 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦801 |
| 118725167 (Comments: 1) | englu (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hej. Pamiętasz dlaczego oznaczyłeś tę ścieżkę jako highway=footway? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042172384 Są tam jakieś ograniczenia dla ruchu rowerzystów? commented 2025-09-11 22:20:20 UTC by SpinOff ♦305 |
| 169429897 (Comments: 3) | aurekosc (Discussed changesets: 5) | Je viens de changer le niveau (0, car c’est au niveau du sol). Pour mettre de l’eau au moulin : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel > For some grade separated crossings it may how... commented 2025-09-11 22:15:46 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦11 |
| 171181293 (Comments: 1) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi und vielen Dank für deinen Edit. Sind das hier tatsächlich Parkbuchten? Auf dem Luftbild sieht es eher so aus als würde hier eher auf der Fahrbahn geparkt werden. Das würde dann für parking=lane statt parking=street_... commented 2025-09-11 22:07:19 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 171803940 (Comments: 1) | Paul Flo Williams (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks commented 2025-09-11 22:07:06 UTC by UtterClutter ♦25 |
| 171792135 (Comments: 3) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 178) | Nie ma sprawy. Dokładnie, poza brakiem pokazywania ich na mapie to nie kierują do adresów przy takich drogach. Dlatego bardzo ważne jest, aby ustawiać poprawne kategorie. Track to droga na pole lub do lasu, a niestety wiele osób bł... commented 2025-09-11 22:00:56 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦738 |
| 171301939 (Comments: 1) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, hier das gleiche mit dem Radweg, Musste auch hier leider wieder löschen und habe dein Changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171804845 revertet. Soweit ich erkennen kann hast du in diesem Changeset nichts auß... commented 2025-09-11 21:59:08 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 171205167 (Comments: 2) | Thosewhoknow (Discussed changesets: 5) | May I see a source for this? The OSM wiki states that they are 'power=line' if they’re carried by 'power=tower' nodes. commented 2025-09-11 21:54:27 UTC by Thosewhoknow ♦3 |
| 171303172 (Comments: 1) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, hier das gleiche mit dem Radweg, bitte aufpassen. Musste auch hier leider wieder löschen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-09-11 21:49:49 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 169621807 (Comments: 7) | aurekosc (Discussed changesets: 5) | Je me disais aussi, je ne suis pas fou, c’est OSM qui l’est : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418113522/history Y a pas ta modif dans l’historique :o commented 2025-09-11 21:45:52 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦11 |
| 171758549 (Comments: 1) | gregcrago (Discussed changesets: 40) | This actually isn't a waterbody of any sort, though it does look like it on aerial imagery-- that's part of why on the ground verification is important for OSM. This is actually a large black tarp with tires placed on it. It collects water ... commented 2025-09-11 21:41:39 UTC by colorful-corvid ♦6 |
| 171305077 (Comments: 1) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, auch hier bitte unbedingt aufpassen. Auch hier hast du den Radweg seperat gemappt hinzugefügt obwohl er bereits an der Fahrbahnlinie umfangreich gemappt war. Auch hier gab es nun durch deinen Edit zwei "Radwege" an gleiche... commented 2025-09-11 21:40:25 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 171803044 (Comments: 3) | Paul Flo Williams (Discussed changesets: 3) | You can also see UPRNs for buildings that no longer exist, so you have to be careful to avoid these. For example, in Peacehaven, plenty of single houses on a plot have been demolished and two put in its place. The UPRN tool may well show 3 UPRNs in t... commented 2025-09-11 21:38:43 UTC by Paul Flo Williams ♦2 |
| 171679781 (Comments: 2) | MonteDesert (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Totor, Thank you for your input, I had added a oneway=yes previously, but removed it right after. I will keep in mind that the separation of lanes is temporary. commented 2025-09-11 21:37:30 UTC by MonteDesert ♦2 |
 | 171686118 (Comments: 2) | KarooDesert (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, Thank you for informing me of the concerns that you have with the edits made here. Looking at Mapillary Imagery, I do see another entry/exit for the vehicle inspection office (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=46.090943533448&lng=... commented 2025-09-11 21:34:00 UTC by KarooDesert ♦4 |
| 170189455 (Comments: 1) | emmaps (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nu er vejene tagget med både maxspeed=30 og maxspeed:advisory=30 Det giver jo ikke mening. Der er ingen kilde i dit changeset. Har de faktisk ændret hastighedsgrænsen fra de blå 30 kmh vejledene skilte til rigtig... commented 2025-09-11 21:28:14 UTC by Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦603 |
| 141323724 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 128) | I am sorry for all the work you've had to do. Just can you try to use less 'snarky' block messages, and message me the reason for 10rex's block and the email address to 10rex? -Hayvenhurst41 commented 2025-09-11 21:25:19 UTC by hayvenhurst-x ♦2 |
| 171597339 (Comments: 2) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Viele Grüße und schön das du mitmappst commented 2025-09-11 21:23:45 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 171801364 (Comments: 2) | MatCr (Discussed changesets: 1) | PS: Ho visto che in alcune ref dei pba, forse non in questo changeset, hai anche messo la P nel codice. A me pare che quella P sia della permissività e non del codice stesso... ma potrei anche sbagliare. commented 2025-09-11 21:23:15 UTC by AwFi ♦36 |
| 141045464 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 128) | I am sorry for these vandilizations and will not creating any more socks in the future. I understand if you block me, just please don't revert my edits without looking at them first. Also, I still don't know why I was banned. As you ... commented 2025-09-11 21:22:53 UTC by hayvenhurst-x ♦2 |
| 171782028 (Comments: 1) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi und vielen Dank für deinen Edit. Diese Kreuzung ist verkehrsrechtlich kein Kreisverkehr sondern nur rund mit rechts vor links und genau deswegen hatte ich das erst vor kurzem mit junction:circular gataggt. Habe die Kreuzung daher jetzt ... commented 2025-09-11 21:18:05 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 170722996 (Comments: 3) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Außerdem hast du in diesem Fall keine Oneway Angabe gemacht. Damit würde ein Navigationssystem hier Radfahrer auf dieser Seite als Geisterfahrer fahren lassen commented 2025-09-11 21:01:43 UTC by geisthugo123 ♦91 |
| 171803263 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 349) | commentaar moet zijn node verschoven. commented 2025-09-11 20:58:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171794080 (Comments: 2) | SimplyLivingNow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you!! commented 2025-09-11 20:44:04 UTC by SimplyLivingNow ♦1 |
| 171754569 (Comments: 1) | ynx (Discussed changesets: 24) | одноэтажные пристройки к многоэтажам это building:part, а не отдельные здания.. Я одно здание тут переделал, хорошо бы, если у вас тоже получило... commented 2025-09-11 20:18:48 UTC by literan ♦6,781 |
| 171789541 (Comments: 1) | sydtrudel2008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome! Nice to see other folks adding info about local businesses here :) One question though...in addition to adding the businesses, you seem to have moved the node representing Saint-Lambert itself??? I'm not sure what repercussions t... commented 2025-09-11 20:17:04 UTC by Hugues Ross ♦12 |
| 1 (Comments: 53) | Steve (Discussed changesets: 4) | suppp commented 2025-09-11 20:00:28 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦76 |
| 171801177 (Comments: 1) | NRmapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi NRmapper, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 88 building(s) Could you please confirm if th... commented 2025-09-11 19:58:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171679335 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 54) | I may have forgotten to add `embankment=yes` commented 2025-09-11 19:50:21 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,596 |
| 171630367 (Comments: 3) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 31) | Is the address in 'contact' not the physical one? And the one in 'postal' the one to contact the farm? You can leave the tags, but they aren't really useful without any tool using this information. commented 2025-09-11 19:38:10 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 171694576 (Comments: 3) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 35) | I can't find any license statement on this site. Do you have a written statement that this data can be copied to OSM? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines commented 2025-09-11 19:31:39 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 153581430 (Comments: 3) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 51) | Great, thanks commented 2025-09-11 19:05:49 UTC by eteb3 ♦123 |
| 171764292 (Comments: 2) | lukbas (Discussed changesets: 20) | Cześć Andy. Czasem, gdy obiekt, np. szkoła wymaga dużo zmian aby doprowadzić do standardu OSM piszę zbiorową uwagę. Mógłbym robić pojedyncze zmiany i kolejno zapisywać, ale to chyba mija się z celem, gdy obiekt nie zmienia parametr... commented 2025-09-11 19:02:32 UTC by lukbas ♦17 |
| 171799213 (Comments: 1) | Aidan_T (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-11 18:58:28 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 169108532 (Comments: 3) | lukbas (Discussed changesets: 20) | Skonkretyzuj, jakie dane, jakiego obiektu (obiektów) poprawiłeś. commented 2025-09-11 18:56:02 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171799013 (Comments: 2) | Frills (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dit was overigens geen BAG adresnode.. Dus no problem. commented 2025-09-11 18:55:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 169656055 (Comments: 1) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, please use fewer nodes for your ways with irrigation=pivot. I have to come thru after you, and reduce them to a 30cm threshold. There is nothing in an agricultural area which is more precise than 30cm. commented 2025-09-11 18:55:22 UTC by bdiscoe ♦52 |
| 171664970 (Comments: 3) | lukbas (Discussed changesets: 20) | Taki komentarz byłby jak najbardziej na miejscu. commented 2025-09-11 18:55:20 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171792648 (Comments: 1) | Martin Larry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-11 18:51:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171750842 (Comments: 3) | Buttons Cheely (Discussed changesets: 33) | don't think so - turning left at that entrance works fine in OSRM now. commented 2025-09-11 18:38:34 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171652724 (Comments: 2) | H-M-T (Discussed changesets: 3) | I changed all the name=NUMBER to addr:housenumber=NUMBER. Don't use the name=* for a description! I also remove a few invalid addr:housnumber from highways. Best regards Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data W... commented 2025-09-11 18:15:23 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,804 |
| 171793939 (Comments: 1) | Great Carmania MS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I didn't see any street Davis Road near by, you website has an error, the aerial image shows no building. Did you get the point right? commented 2025-09-11 18:07:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171697135 (Comments: 4) | Anonymous897234 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please feel free to ask for some feedback in the forums, but my hunch is that the general gist is that this is too much for OSM. commented 2025-09-11 18:06:41 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 171790322 (Comments: 3) | BooShooter (Discussed changesets: 1) | The one south on 27 is next to Northland Mini Storage south of N Ranger Station Rd. commented 2025-09-11 17:54:27 UTC by iandees ♦736 |
| 171710664 (Comments: 2) | Ken Weaver (Discussed changesets: 2) | It's also a good to add a tag to describe the business of Lux AutoHouse. In the editor, just search for the type of business to add the tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2025-09-11 17:53:56 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 168530688 (Comments: 1) | zluuzki (Discussed changesets: 119) | FYI, this changeset with church which has been gone for years. https://www.osm.org/note/4956347 commented 2025-09-11 17:51:01 UTC by bdentremont ♦56 |
| 171736888 (Comments: 1) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 25) | Здравствуйте! Пожалуйста не смешивайте адрес по комплексу и адрес по улице. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Набережные_Челны Исправил в пакете 1717966... commented 2025-09-11 17:42:29 UTC by CometSeeker ♦23 |
| 171796183 (Comments: 1) | tangue (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi tangue, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. Th... commented 2025-09-11 17:38:15 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 146502079 (Comments: 1) | b-holdet (Discussed changesets: 72) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241566404 Man skal *enten* markere den ene bane some tunnel *eller* den anden som bro. Ikke begge dele. Ifølge: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge?uselang=en-GB commented 2025-09-11 17:29:08 UTC by cyclist789 ♦36 |
| 171791617 (Comments: 4) | GPS Renting (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you. have a great day ahead! commented 2025-09-11 17:25:03 UTC by GPS Renting ♦1 |
| 171776361 (Comments: 1) | furkankahraman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Belirtilen alanda bisiklet sürmenin yasak olduğunu belirten bir işaret bulunuyor mu? Bisikletlinin bisiklet yolu olmadığında en sağ şeriti kullanma hakkı var. commented 2025-09-11 17:22:10 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171457594 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 105) | Resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171791746 I see, thanks for that commented 2025-09-11 17:20:47 UTC by gurglypipe ♦915 |
| 171791153 (Comments: 1) | kartler175 (Discussed changesets: 134) | Dans la très grande majorité des cas, ce ne sont pas des doublons. L'éditeur JOSM est moins flexible à ce sujet, mais nous avons le choix de considérer ces avertissements ou pas. J'insère dans OSM ... commented 2025-09-11 17:13:52 UTC by pat-lachute ♦6 |
| 171791163 (Comments: 1) | kartler175 (Discussed changesets: 134) | Dans la très grande majorité des cas, ce ne sont pas des doublons. L'éditeur JOSM est moins flexible à ce sujet, mais nous avons le choix de considérer ces avertissements ou pas. J'insère dans OSM ... commented 2025-09-11 17:13:39 UTC by pat-lachute ♦6 |
| 171785407 (Comments: 1) | Roxy5958 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Telefon numaralarındaki +90 kısmını silmeyin lütfen. Türkiye alan kodu o. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171795071 commented 2025-09-11 17:05:35 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
 | 146043580 (Comments: 3) | GEOCAL NC (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-09-11 17:04:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171785349 (Comments: 1) | Nicholas Appiagyei (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I recommend using Bing aerial imagery as Esri World Imagery is very out-dated and misaligned with existing data. Also one building per changeset can be more buildings per changeset. Write good changeset comments that describe what you have m... commented 2025-09-11 16:51:43 UTC by Enock4seth ♦563 |
| 170064239 (Comments: 4) | TymZ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Soetwas würde ich prinzipell nicht eintragen, vorallem da es nicht überprüfbar ist. Wir mappen grundsätzlich nichts, was nicht vom Öffentlichen Grund oder von Luftbildern aus sichtbar ist. Ich mappe auch den Bunker ... commented 2025-09-11 16:46:22 UTC by vikiawv ♦22 |
| 171788354 (Comments: 1) | Dr Dt Mustafa Akcan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Açılış saati pazartesiden cumartesiye kadar 09.30-15.00, pazar günü ise 09.30-15.00 mi? commented 2025-09-11 16:42:44 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171709371 (Comments: 3) | çokamaçokgizliOSM (Discussed changesets: 2) | O şekilde haritalandırmışsınız da o yüzden sormuştum. commented 2025-09-11 16:36:16 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171785354 (Comments: 2) | friendsacademylibrary (Discussed changesets: 1) | The building is both called Kumar Wang Library and contains a library. commented 2025-09-11 16:35:03 UTC by friendsacademylibrary ♦1 |
| 158783868 (Comments: 1) | Sal73x (Discussed changesets: 77) | Hi Buddy, How about spatial accuracy of way 165070364? Referring to Esri World Imagery as entire Addis Ababa city data is somewhat sync with it. ---------------------------------------- Hola amigo ¿Qué t... commented 2025-09-11 16:31:01 UTC by OSM_GEO_Validator ♦5 |
| 158799100 (Comments: 2) | Sal73x (Discussed changesets: 77) | Hola amigo, ¿Estás seguro de la existencia y la conexión de la vía 1331152593 y de la construcción de la vía 1331152599? Los automóviles y camiones son visibles en https://www.mapillary.c... commented 2025-09-11 16:23:37 UTC by OSM_GEO_Validator ♦5 |
| 171792438 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 376) | Wrong comment: Add via node to u-turn restriction. commented 2025-09-11 16:05:48 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 167699353 (Comments: 3) | josmougn (Discussed changesets: 72) | je crois que c'était un oubli volontaire de ma part, inconsciemment j'ai du avoir peur de casser le DSC dans osm, tant l'aménagement sur place est mal foutu et difficile à transcrire. La petite portion n'es... commented 2025-09-11 16:04:20 UTC by josmougn ♦236 |
| 171790723 (Comments: 2) | pat-lachute (Discussed changesets: 10) | Es-tu certain qu'il y avait une ancienne voie ferrée à cet endroit ? Je ne crois pas. commented 2025-09-11 15:52:42 UTC by pat-lachute ♦6 |
| 165861540 (Comments: 2) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 3) | P.S. : Pour hiérarchiser des chemins forestiers en fonction de leur qualité de roulement, il est possible d'utiliser l'attribut highway=track, avec les co-attributs tracktype et smoothness. commented 2025-09-11 15:49:41 UTC by webfil ♦36 |
| 171766959 (Comments: 2) | naomap (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour. J'avoue m'être un peu emballé en découvrant l'outil Complète tes commerces. Je corrige : Antoine. commented 2025-09-11 15:45:45 UTC by naomap ♦61 |
| 160852047 (Comments: 4) | ZeLonewolf (Discussed changesets: 149) | Relations are just a collection of member ways. I'm not sure what you're asking. commented 2025-09-11 15:34:13 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦567 |
| 171785489 (Comments: 2) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Bedankt voor de controle eggie! commented 2025-09-11 15:24:01 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 171478512 (Comments: 2) | Simon1595 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in 171789157 since no response. commented 2025-09-11 15:13:50 UTC by NM$L ♦86 |
| 171787307 (Comments: 1) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Looks more like it goes through the gate on the west side of that building rather than under it --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171787307 commented 2025-09-11 15:11:18 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦4 |
| 171536827 (Comments: 1) | AED123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there AED123, In this changeset and two others just before it, you appear to have added three different AEDs all within a few metres of each other: * https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13123190301 * https://www.openstreetmap.org/n... commented 2025-09-11 15:10:52 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦285 |
| 171398751 (Comments: 1) | Jerome Lacombe 3M (Discussed changesets: 2) | bonjour, les bouts de rues (Rosset et Foch) qui restent en zone de rencontre plutôt qu'en zone piétonne c'est pas un peu incohérent avec le reste ? commented 2025-09-11 15:09:51 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦110 |
| 171786824 (Comments: 1) | Gero Gerke (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hallo, bitte keine Gebäude nach Luftbild "fixen", wenn ALKIS verfügbar ist. Das Gebäude war bereits nach ALKIS gemappt. Gruß commented 2025-09-11 15:09:12 UTC by aixbrick ♦854 |
| 171702868 (Comments: 2) | Bienenberm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, ich habe die Wege - teilweise - mit dem Fahrrad (Tourenrad) abgefahren. Von Norden kommend ist der Weg vielleicht Grad 4, ab Graben nur noch zerfahrenes Sandfeld - viel Fahrradschieben. Der Abzweig nach Süden ist 150 m lang max. Grad 4... commented 2025-09-11 15:04:45 UTC by Bienenberm ♦3 |
| 171636576 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171779624 Segments were merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171779624#map=16/42.39032/-82.95843&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:59:06 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171629443 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171787662 Segments merged back together http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171787662 commented 2025-09-11 14:58:35 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171602774 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171787329 Segments merged back together http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171787329 commented 2025-09-11 14:57:49 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171600049 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171786971 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171786971#map=18/42.405000/-82.932761&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:57:24 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599933 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171786777 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171786777#map=14/42.40409/-82.93276&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:57:11 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599743 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171785824 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171785824#map=16/42.41142/-82.93848&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:56:55 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599253 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171785544 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171785544 commented 2025-09-11 14:56:39 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599138 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171785239 Segments merged back together http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171785239 commented 2025-09-11 14:56:23 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599002 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171783041 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171783041 commented 2025-09-11 14:56:02 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171597681 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171782421 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171782421 commented 2025-09-11 14:55:46 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171560002 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171782204 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171782204 commented 2025-09-11 14:55:27 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559917 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171781853 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171781853 commented 2025-09-11 14:55:09 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559822 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171781107 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171781107#map=17/42.414168/-82.926931&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:54:49 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559727 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171780741 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780741 commented 2025-09-11 14:54:22 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559485 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171780658 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780658 commented 2025-09-11 14:53:41 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559352 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171780549 Segments merged back together http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780549 commented 2025-09-11 14:53:13 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171558929 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780446#map=16/42.41418/-82.92693&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:52:34 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171558530 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171780157 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780157#map=17/42.412917/-82.927839&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:51:46 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171755072 (Comments: 1) | ElysiumTaxis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Muchas gracias por sus ediciones. Si bien se entiende perfecto lo que intenta hacer agregando nodos con direcciones para corregir el nombre de las calles, no es una buena práctica el estar editando incorrectamente para que otros maper... commented 2025-09-11 14:51:35 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,473 |
| 171787240 (Comments: 3) | Spinner1991 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Trottoirs die in het niets eindigen routeren niet. commented 2025-09-11 14:48:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171703133 (Comments: 1) | mazmapperz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Te rog sa adaugi diacritice la denumirile diverse pe care le adaugi. Multumim pentru intelegere. commented 2025-09-11 14:38:11 UTC by rarad74 ♦288 |
| 170527043 (Comments: 1) | stelan1999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you have moved a bench into a building. I suspect this was done accidentally. Could you please move it back to its correct location? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6888682615 Hallo, Sie haben eine Bank in ein Gebäude versch... commented 2025-09-11 14:33:27 UTC by baby-banana ♦2 |
| 168416999 (Comments: 1) | Hansiepanzie (Discussed changesets: 3) | I think you might have broken this track (that was): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93572903/history commented 2025-09-11 14:27:54 UTC by EdLoach ♦172 |
| 171787855 (Comments: 1) | meisoof (Discussed changesets: 11) | *Park commented 2025-09-11 14:27:41 UTC by meisoof ♦7 |
| 171783510 (Comments: 2) | mossie61 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed duplicated tagging commented 2025-09-11 13:59:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171786026 (Comments: 1) | Simoi@9000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Simoi@9000, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field... commented 2025-09-11 13:57:03 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171778360 (Comments: 7) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ik heb het aangepast naar fietspad in de tunneltjes. De maxheight laten staan. motor_vehicle en maxspeed verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-11 13:55:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171782938 (Comments: 1) | Martin Ligabue (Discussed changesets: 23) | scusate per la dimensione del cs, pensavo la dividesse da sé, lol, f commented 2025-09-11 13:54:50 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦30 |
| 171775256 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 872) | I'm familiar with JOSM, but less so with Level0. I have used it for one of my favourite changesets - The move of a statue from Euston Station to up near Middlesborough. With Level0 I could just punch in the ICBM coordinates. commented 2025-09-11 13:54:26 UTC by spiregrain ♦207 |
| 171614967 (Comments: 2) | öreg (Discussed changesets: 66) | Ich gehe davon aus, dass in Deutschland sind in überwiegender Mehrheit christlich. commented 2025-09-11 13:34:51 UTC by öreg ♦18 |
| 171761810 (Comments: 1) | evanpeterjones (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you tagged the landuse area around it and the neighboring business, but no worries, I did a little homework and moved that information to the correct building. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Publish... commented 2025-09-11 13:32:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171764887 (Comments: 2) | öreg (Discussed changesets: 66) | Ich bin gestern mit dem Rad langefahren und mit meinem Smartphone aufgenommen. Nördlich des Weges ist allerdings meadow, oder natural grassland. commented 2025-09-11 13:30:39 UTC by öreg ♦18 |
| 171732430 (Comments: 3) | moshikosh (Discussed changesets: 4) | ok, will wait till someone scout this area commented 2025-09-11 13:19:12 UTC by Sanniu ♦576 |
| 171768971 (Comments: 1) | thehousewashere (Discussed changesets: 1) | You can just use the unit designator without "suite" in the address. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171768971 commented 2025-09-11 13:16:45 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171405136 (Comments: 1) | Xandrex (Discussed changesets: 11) | Salut Xandrex, Je trouve qu'on perd en information quand on supprime la séparation piste cyclable / chemin piéton dans des situations comme ici où les deux sont assez nettement séparés, qu'on trouve une... commented 2025-09-11 13:14:45 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,153 |
| 122102160 (Comments: 2) | Mlik Point (Discussed changesets: 13) | According to VicTraffic data source, it's not possible to change road names from "Of" to "Off". commented 2025-09-11 13:14:43 UTC by Mlik Point ♦7 |
| 171780876 (Comments: 1) | ManiekP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-09-11 13:11:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171777449 (Comments: 1) | tegabo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you made edits across a pretty big geographic area. It's best to keep them local so that they're easier to review and don't alert people across the country :) commented 2025-09-11 13:11:36 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦4 |
| 171780350 (Comments: 2) | Philippe White (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merci pour ta relecture ! Avant d'ajouter ces liaisons on va vérifier sur le terrain s'il y a bien une interruption de la bordure. J'ai un doute. On fera la modif si cela existe vraiment. commented 2025-09-11 13:10:51 UTC by Philippe White ♦4 |
| 171568056 (Comments: 2) | Colbertson (Discussed changesets: 26) | Fixed. Added "sidewalk:right/left=seperate" to the roads. commented 2025-09-11 12:55:43 UTC by Colbertson ♦114 |
| 166430587 (Comments: 5) | Cristoffs (Discussed changesets: 127) | Bardzo wątpliwe źródło, nie nadaje się do OSM bez dodatkowej weryfikacji. Szczególnie jak jest sprzeczne z orto itd. Spośród 5 budynków tylko jeden istnieje w stanie zarośniętej zawalonej ruiny, po kolejnym został... commented 2025-09-11 12:52:03 UTC by VA00 ♦599 |
| 154173936 (Comments: 1) | mapowicz_pl (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zerkniesz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4611205 ? commented 2025-09-11 12:32:57 UTC by YomanNH ♦339 |
| 171778291 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dit lijkt me niet geloofwaardig. commented 2025-09-11 12:30:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171778409 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 12) | Vanwaar deze wijziging? Hoe kan een stukje fietspad opeens een unclassified zijn met motor_vehicle -no Welk bord staat hier? gr eggie commented 2025-09-11 12:30:24 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171778497 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 12) | Waarom maak je van een fietspad een highway unclassified met motor_vehicle-no Auto verkeer kan daar niet eens komen? Je tags houden ook moped en mofa tegen. Het is een bromfietspad. GRaag reactie eggie commented 2025-09-11 12:29:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 166023055 (Comments: 1) | LaTêteDansLeGuidon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour LaTêteDansLeGuidon Parfaite cette nouvelle voie verte ! 👍 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385050845 et suite) J'ai même pu localiser le panneau C115 avec tes photos sur Panoramax ; merci ! J'ai ajout&... commented 2025-09-11 12:24:46 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,153 |
| 171780268 (Comments: 1) | ThePigeonCompany15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | What on earth is this changeset comment all about? commented 2025-09-11 12:22:24 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,283 |
| 171781054 (Comments: 1) | DPD-Joure (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag HJSC de leisure=pitch is het speelveld zelf. Ik heb het aangepast naar sports_centre. Dit pitch ligt daar als veld in. CTRL-F5 voor het effect te versnellen. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-11 12:21:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171637151 (Comments: 2) | Denis_Helfer (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hello, Sorry, it was a mistake. demo=demolished_building. Corrected. Thanks for the notice. commented 2025-09-11 12:14:11 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦95 |
| 171746176 (Comments: 2) | Elefant aus Wuppertal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke dir für deinen Kommentar :) Ja, mich haben vor allem die Aufzüge interessiert. Brilon Wald liegt zugegeben ziemlich abgelegen, das muss man sich schon extra vornehmen, um da vorbeizukommen. Aber der Vorteil war, es wa... commented 2025-09-11 12:11:12 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦1 |
| 171775563 (Comments: 3) | ieoua (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Eggie, bedankt voor de hulp! Dank voor de tips, die zal ik de volgende keer in de praktijk brengen :-) Groet! commented 2025-09-11 12:06:52 UTC by ieoua ♦1 |
| 163978418 (Comments: 1) | nb77 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Добрий день! Хотів спитати мету додання аєропорту на мапу. Ви ж розумієте що це не простий обєкт, прошу видалити зміни внесені вами. commented 2025-09-11 12:01:05 UTC by Nnifria ♦1 |
| 171772450 (Comments: 1) | Ahmedstreets (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Ahmedstreets, Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions. There are a few things you need to be aware of as you contribute to OSM. First, we use Title Case for names but not UPPER CASE. Secondly, the addr:street is rese... commented 2025-09-11 11:55:26 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦97 |
| 170132069 (Comments: 9) | Danil (Discussed changesets: 15) | Rencana sekarang dimulai dengan melengkapi koordinat desa/kelurahan/nagari/nagori/pekon/lembang/dll di wikidata lalu per kabupaten (via OpenRefine) diubah ke TSV atau GeoJson untuk dimerge dengan node village existing (via JOSM) agar history nodenya ... commented 2025-09-11 11:54:26 UTC by Danil ♦28 |
| 171779658 (Comments: 4) | 9292-DM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dank voor de controle en toevoegingen. Ziet er goed uit zo. commented 2025-09-11 11:51:56 UTC by 9292-DM ♦2 |
| 171540670 (Comments: 3) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 171) | Danke dir! commented 2025-09-11 11:43:55 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
 | 170764936 (Comments: 1) | samuelzammit (Discussed changesets: 10) | Please check the alignment of the roads eg Triq il fortizza tal Mosta. it is offset to the South. I fixed several datum points from PA server e.g. the roundabout. Note the satellite maps are often badly offset and not consistently so you need to chec... commented 2025-09-11 11:36:55 UTC by mikefalzon ♦6 |
| 171391747 (Comments: 1) | Flayer (Discussed changesets: 68) | Hi, is the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426363366 - roundabout? commented 2025-09-11 11:29:49 UTC by Sanniu ♦576 |
| 171775639 (Comments: 2) | mijlpaal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb wat accesstags verwijderd. Die zijn allemaal default. commented 2025-09-11 11:24:54 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171635934 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset Segments were merged back together and wrong restrictions were removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171779133#map=14/42.38705/-82.95744&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 11:18:02 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 165390166 (Comments: 2) | Bathyscapher (Discussed changesets: 115) | Hello kuhin74, you are very right, sorry. Thank you for noticing :) commented 2025-09-11 11:11:26 UTC by Bathyscapher ♦23 |
| 171121303 (Comments: 4) | AmOosm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aha, skaidrs. Jā, tad tas būs ED gļuks. P.S. Es gan te drošvien liktu bollard šiem. commented 2025-09-11 11:08:26 UTC by HellMap ♦708 |
| 167020707 (Comments: 2) | Milibiakus (Discussed changesets: 3) | @Mateusz Konieczny No, its really a hydrant that gets its water from groundwater. Here in Germany, they are called "Löschwasserbrunnen". They are not a hydrant in a classical way, more like a suction point for our fire pumps and a a... commented 2025-09-11 11:02:16 UTC by Milibiakus ♦1 |
| 171755352 (Comments: 4) | 小智智 (Discussed changesets: 68) | I also did the same to some other stations, such as Tottenham Court Road, a while ago. Those I left separate are those where there is a clear boundary on the ground between areas of responsibility, where the parts can be operated separately, ... commented 2025-09-11 10:58:42 UTC by 小智智 ♦54 |
| 171775464 (Comments: 2) | Spinner1991 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het speeltuintje heb ik verwijderd. Dat stond al op de kaart. commented 2025-09-11 10:53:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171626122 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171777770 Segments were merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171777770#map=17/42.399704/-82.963700&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 10:50:18 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171764684 (Comments: 6) | Marek_P (Discussed changesets: 24) | nie zgodzę się. Prędkości to jeden z wielu elementów. Poza tym uzupełnienie tagów przejść dla pieszych, ciągi drzew, niektóre znaki drogowe, pasy ruchu, przystanki autobusowe, chodniki i tak dalej. I to tylko w tym jednym... commented 2025-09-11 10:44:05 UTC by Marek_P ♦21 |
| 171602512 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171777252 Segments were merged back together and wrong restrictions were removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171777252#map=15/42.39744/-82.94638&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 10:37:04 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171771787 (Comments: 1) | cucu (Discussed changesets: 29) | Cool danke! commented 2025-09-11 10:34:47 UTC by redd ♦424 |
| 168617624 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 8) | historic:civilization=komunist skąd pomysł na taki tag? W Polsce PRL nie było komunizmu (m.in. za sprawą silnego ochronnego wpływu KK) tak jak w ZSRR, tylko socjalizm. Skąd pewność, że basen nie powstał za Niemca, te tereny do 1945 roku... commented 2025-09-11 10:31:04 UTC by Aim311_ ♦129 |
| 171624970 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171776537 Segments were merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171776537 commented 2025-09-11 10:30:00 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171751344 (Comments: 5) | Private Chalets (Discussed changesets: 2) | Super danke. Noch eine Frage: Bei einem Haus (ApartHotel) vermieten wir zwei getrennte Einheiten mit unterschiedlichen Namen. Kann ich einfach zwei Hotels auf ein Haus/ eine Adresse machen? Lg danke Hubertus commented 2025-09-11 10:18:29 UTC by Private Chalets ♦1 |
| 171603175 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171775592 Segments were merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171775592 commented 2025-09-11 10:05:42 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171350171 (Comments: 1) | Tourismusverband Zell-Gerlos - Zillertal Arena (Discussed changesets: 4) | Servus, hier haben sich zusätzlich zum Namen (da ist euch ein kleines "Z" reingeruscht) auch noch die Seite und Nummer usw. geändert laut https://www.restaurant-tuxer.at/ commented 2025-09-11 10:04:59 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 171772503 (Comments: 1) | Odzież uliczna Sklep WARRIORSHOP_PL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, cofnąłem edycję, bo brak było typu sklepu oraz nie wiem czy naprawdę zajmował cały budynek. Przeczytaj proszę https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487/1 i spróbuj dodać... commented 2025-09-11 10:04:08 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,777 |
| 171350223 (Comments: 1) | Tourismusverband Zell-Gerlos - Zillertal Arena (Discussed changesets: 4) | Servus, hier sind die Tags von name und die contact:website übersehen worden beim aufräumen, wenn es den Gasthof nimmer gibt, ist das ja auch alles weg. Wenn ihr das noch nachzieht, wär das super. Alles gute! commented 2025-09-11 10:03:25 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 171350280 (Comments: 1) | Tourismusverband Zell-Gerlos - Zillertal Arena (Discussed changesets: 4) | Servus, hier werden sich auch Öffnungszeiten, Nummer und Webseite geändert haben, oder? Seite hab ich keine gefunden auf die schnelle, aber laut https://www.zillertalarena.com/zell/der-ort/essen-trinken/detail/infrastructure/spitz-bua-bar-r... commented 2025-09-11 10:00:16 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 171771732 (Comments: 1) | Troy Asset Management (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The business doesn't occupy the whole building, so I've reverted the building tags. I added the tag office=financial to your POI. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-09-11 09:58:07 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
| 171346931 (Comments: 1) | Tourismusverband Zell-Gerlos - Zillertal Arena (Discussed changesets: 4) | Servus, schön, dass ihr auch mitmacht. Von Schneeberger ist online nichts mehr zu finden, ich nehme an, dass der Gynäkologe auch nicht mehr dort ist? Online ist er nämlich zu finden. Zur Boutique: Bei einem Laden ist es ja ... commented 2025-09-11 09:56:36 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 136635435 (Comments: 2) | mapping_dave (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Chris, das ist vermutlich aus versehen passiert. Korrigieren es gerne. :-) Gruß, David commented 2025-09-11 09:54:45 UTC by mapping_dave ♦4 |
| 171770903 (Comments: 2) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Yay! In iD kan je het er ook op slepen, zo blijkt. Weer wat geleerd. commented 2025-09-11 09:45:18 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 171772666 (Comments: 1) | K4nciasty (Discussed changesets: 52) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385026424 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-09-11 09:41:16 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 161768408 (Comments: 1) | zabik (Discussed changesets: 1) | dude u supposed to tag them maxspeed=25 mph not maxspeed=25 please fix it thanks commented 2025-09-11 09:36:36 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦76 |
| 170866588 (Comments: 2) | Enock4seth (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi, I continue to delete and reuse where possible https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gh/2023-May/000649.html several useless cluster of ways (some unconnected, path-unclassified-path) in Ghana by multiple remote mapping groups, and yes... commented 2025-09-11 09:15:25 UTC by Enock4seth ♦563 |
| 171761776 (Comments: 2) | quintinethan (Discussed changesets: 1) | This road is closed and a new underpass to be built. https://bigbuild.vic.gov.au/projects/level-crossing-removal-project/projects/webster-street-dandenong commented 2025-09-11 09:10:32 UTC by nevw ♦2,022 |
| 159623614 (Comments: 1) | xrt (Discussed changesets: 52) | Bonjour, parmi ce groupe de modifications figurent plusieurs modifications de poches de stationnement qui ont été rattachées à la route à côté de laquelle elles se trouvent. Pouvez-vous m&... commented 2025-09-11 09:08:43 UTC by Lucie_MAITRE ♦2 |
| 171022719 (Comments: 5) | Yannvyv3cvl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dans ce cas il existe un seul nœud. Les versions 1, 2, 3 sont des vues historiques de l'état du nœud dans le passé, et a ce titre elles ne peuvent plus être modifiées. commented 2025-09-11 09:05:10 UTC by Dani CS ♦66 |
| 171772237 (Comments: 1) | kjarzylo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-09-11 09:00:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 170102513 (Comments: 9) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 58) | O exemplo da wiki, aínda que está en "Comparison of life cycle concepts", está na sección "Date namespace" (btw, quedou en draft, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Proposal_talk:Date_namespace, bota un ollo &aa... commented 2025-09-11 08:55:16 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦185 |
| 171515138 (Comments: 3) | mijlpaal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke... duidelijk. Mapse eggie commented 2025-09-11 08:48:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171538466 (Comments: 6) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mooi zo.. ....Het routeert weer in OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.28932%2C4.91797%3B52.286613%2C4.917208#map=17/52.287991/4.917197 Groet eggie commented 2025-09-11 08:47:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171760029 (Comments: 3) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 121) | Po prostu "nowe adresy" - miejsca zmian nie musisz dodawać, jest przecież widoczne na mapie! commented 2025-09-11 08:41:42 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171771555 (Comments: 1) | Latentalumo (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinn... commented 2025-09-11 08:40:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171610985 (Comments: 2) | Mark Whitby (Discussed changesets: 1) | I re-added the water bubbler commented 2025-09-11 08:40:56 UTC by nevw ♦2,022 |
| 168048817 (Comments: 1) | Bengsy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Bengsy Du hast hier die Adresse von euch geändert. In OpenStreetMap ist aber die geographische Lage wichtiger, als die erfassten Adress-Daten, und das Büro ist so immer noch im Breitsch und nicht im Holligerhof. Ich habe dein ... commented 2025-09-11 08:36:54 UTC by habi ♦1,883 |
| 165805506 (Comments: 2) | HeinerSchaefer (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hello Charles, I hope I've done this because it was signed like this. If you have better information feel free to change it. Regards, Heiner commented 2025-09-11 08:35:52 UTC by HeinerSchaefer ♦21 |
| 170105932 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 8) | Proszę, byś stosował się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:33:14 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171126371 (Comments: 3) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 105) | Right, thanks for surveying. The fact that the church access road was previously 5mph would surely mean that (a) it’s a private road (I don’t believe 5mph speed limits exist or are valid on any public road) and (b) if the 5mph sig... commented 2025-09-11 08:33:13 UTC by gurglypipe ♦915 |
| 170357581 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 8) | Proszę, byś stosował się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:33:07 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 170616738 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 8) | Proszę, byś stosował się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:32:56 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171471162 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 8) | Proszę, byś stosował się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:32:45 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171756955 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 8) | Proszę, byś stosował się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:32:39 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171757112 (Comments: 1) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 114) | Proszę, byś stosował się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:32:00 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171463988 (Comments: 1) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 114) | Proszę, byś stosował się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:31:51 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 170618863 (Comments: 1) | Polciu (Discussed changesets: 33) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:28:28 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171142742 (Comments: 1) | Polciu (Discussed changesets: 33) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:28:14 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171762884 (Comments: 1) | Polciu (Discussed changesets: 33) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:28:00 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171764243 (Comments: 1) | AlenaKS (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-09-11 08:27:31 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171312299 (Comments: 1) | lukbas (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:26:38 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171762147 (Comments: 1) | Jamie Sylver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jamie I have redraw the apartments so that the individual buildings are mapped as is conventional in osm. Because there are two apartment buildings at #29, I put a new node near the letter boxes for the address instead of duplicating the addres... commented 2025-09-11 08:24:57 UTC by nevw ♦2,022 |
| 171685192 (Comments: 1) | öreg (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-09-11 08:23:41 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171612681 (Comments: 1) | öreg (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-09-11 08:23:22 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171645933 (Comments: 1) | öreg (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-09-11 08:23:10 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 170740123 (Comments: 2) | JosV (Discussed changesets: 48) | goto geopunt.be , search for Boljewistenplein, Oudenburg and you will find. commented 2025-09-11 08:22:01 UTC by JosV ♦4 |
| 171769918 (Comments: 1) | rs@6 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Proszę, byś stosował się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-11 08:20:04 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171726937 (Comments: 1) | Ferienhof Oberer Gollmitzer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus, cool, dass ihr mitmacht und Daten ergänzt. Bei der height ist allerdings nicht gemeint, auf welcher Höhe das Gebäude steht, sondern wie hoch das Gebäude selbst ist. Das sieht im 3D-Renderer dann sicher gut aus, wenn wir hi... commented 2025-09-11 08:15:29 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 168983557 (Comments: 1) | letihu (Discussed changesets: 89) | Hallo letihu, Du hast den östlichen Teil des Pfades in Verlängerung der Straße Am Gutshof als privat gekennzeichnet, den westlichen Teil unverändert gelassen (= nicht privat). Ich bin dort vor kurzem entlang gegangen und habe ... commented 2025-09-11 08:13:25 UTC by Steube ♦42 |
| 169605236 (Comments: 3) | SilentScreamer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die naam is toch echt wel aanwezig in de BAG: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?objectId=0193100000015745&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=201806.974&geometry.y=504202.1505&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pa... commented 2025-09-11 08:13:01 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,389 |
| 171750542 (Comments: 1) | Private Chalets (Discussed changesets: 2) | Servus, schön, dass ihr mitmacht. Warum habt ihr denn hier den building=yes tag gelöscht? :) Alles gute commented 2025-09-11 08:09:12 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 171601771 (Comments: 1) | biofuzzy1971 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus biofuzzy1971, ist das einfach nur kein Hostel mehr, oder wurden die Gebäude abgerissen? Auf den Luftbildern sind dei Gebäude nämlich noch zu sehen, drum frag ich :) Alles gute! commented 2025-09-11 08:01:03 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 155405387 (Comments: 1) | -=|MisterY|=- (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, please have a look at: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4956205 Sombody thinks that this object added by you in 2024 is not mapped correctly, thanks commented 2025-09-11 08:00:59 UTC by PPete2 ♦126 |
| 171744155 (Comments: 6) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | basisbewerkingen iD https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/#basisbewerkingen-met-id commented 2025-09-11 07:56:12 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171741623 (Comments: 1) | Quinnhilla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcolme to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4950470545. Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at ht... commented 2025-09-11 07:49:05 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171749273 (Comments: 1) | AlphaDesignSEO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I assume you want to map the layout of the church. The standard procedure for this is called indoor mapping and is described in the wiki at https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging. Could you please adjust your change according... commented 2025-09-11 07:35:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171766674 (Comments: 1) | Pucciotrex30 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Ciao! Grazie mille per la modifica. Sì, per le route ci vorrà un attimo di pazienza viste le numerose linee autobus che passano. Appena ho un attimo di tempo posso occuparmene se non arriva qualcuno prima commented 2025-09-11 07:18:35 UTC by Gabriele Dri ♦27 |
 | 171725933 (Comments: 3) | snavee17 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Poolanaveen, Thank you for contacting us and for helping to improve the quality of OSM maps in the UAE. Regards mona_magdy commented 2025-09-11 07:16:59 UTC by mona_magdy ♦12 |
| 171763497 (Comments: 1) | E J Roberts - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-09-11 07:16:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
 | 171768228 (Comments: 1) | TandinsheRA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi TandinsheRA, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment fiel... commented 2025-09-11 07:16:33 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171685513 (Comments: 2) | Hindediou (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merci beaucoup ! commented 2025-09-11 07:14:21 UTC by Hindediou ♦2 |
| X | 171441074 (Comments: 1) | ☭烈焰狂狮☭ (Discussed changesets: 1) | 此变更集与前一变更集 (171389922) 因故不包含任何修改，且默认不可见。 commented 2025-09-11 07:13:59 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦14 |
| 171767910 (Comments: 1) | privateedit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi privateedit, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment fiel... commented 2025-09-11 07:06:33 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171116797 (Comments: 2) | rokas_osm (Discussed changesets: 15) | Lift should be commissioned on 13.09.2025 commented 2025-09-11 06:53:22 UTC by rokas_osm ♦9 |
| 171767169 (Comments: 1) | Taxeo (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-09-11 06:50:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171733352 (Comments: 2) | Ethan Colley (Discussed changesets: 21) | NSW Planning Portal Spacial Viewer, and the basemap of that website. commented 2025-09-11 06:48:36 UTC by Ethan Colley ♦8 |
| 161104042 (Comments: 1) | Flavio_Crawe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao. Hai assegnato a dei sentieri quelli che presumo siano il nome dato dai biker. Non conosci il tag mtb:name? Ivo commented 2025-09-11 06:41:37 UTC by Jrachi ♦784 |
| 171743928 (Comments: 2) | julsta (Discussed changesets: 5) | Obrazki mapy są przechowywane w pamięci przeglądarki w celu szybszego ładowania. Po edycji po ok. 5 minutach możesz odświeżyć te tzw. kafelki klawiszami `Ctrl+F5` (w niektórych przeglądarkach będzie to inny skrót). https://... commented 2025-09-11 06:30:18 UTC by Marek-M ♦930 |
| 170296211 (Comments: 2) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, aceman444! I changed the tags based on the data from the OSM Wiki at the link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=motor It is said that the tag "highway=raceway" is more suitable for linear objects. Based on this a... commented 2025-09-11 06:03:39 UTC by squeaker_andrus ♦3 |
| 171752508 (Comments: 1) | CultBTW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hvorfor bliver du ved med at tegne ikke eksisterende stier? commented 2025-09-11 05:37:29 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,685 |
| 171607837 (Comments: 2) | Zwiadowca21 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Bez względu na to czy są otwarte wszystkie pasy czy też nie jest to droga ekspresowa S3. commented 2025-09-11 05:27:23 UTC by Zwiadowca21 ♦5 |
| 171607775 (Comments: 2) | Zwiadowca21 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ale oznaczyłem godziny otwarcia=off. Czyli jako zamknięta commented 2025-09-11 05:25:13 UTC by Zwiadowca21 ♦5 |
| 171665990 (Comments: 2) | Mawsons Lake (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the advice, I've now squared those corners commented 2025-09-11 05:20:16 UTC by Mawsons Lake ♦3 |
| 171650458 (Comments: 3) | Polty (Discussed changesets: 1) | So, if the road is closed half the year, it's probably not part of the secondary network, or even the tertiary one. It should probably be tagged residential. commented 2025-09-11 05:16:34 UTC by mat ♦53 |
| 171757952 (Comments: 1) | jhmapo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Good start to your mapping, that's actually two houses, I've amended. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-09-11 04:57:13 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
| 171731457 (Comments: 2) | Vonter (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello. Thanks for pointing out the error. Looks like that should have been in the `name` tag as "Shristhi Village". I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171763717 commented 2025-09-11 04:32:22 UTC by Vonter ♦74 |
| 171665188 (Comments: 2) | Mawsons Lake (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for your advice (I'm a beginner), and I've now made the landuse change commented 2025-09-11 04:16:11 UTC by Mawsons Lake ♦3 |
| 171334218 (Comments: 1) | i2004 (Discussed changesets: 63) | La infraestructura de la parada sigue ahí, por lo tanto lo correcto es dejarla como disused:highway=bus_stop en vez de eliminarla commented 2025-09-11 03:55:53 UTC by AgusQui ♦588 |
| 171756454 (Comments: 2) | muralito (Discussed changesets: 68) | claro, pero no hay foto aerea actual que la muestre, ¿o si? commented 2025-09-11 03:24:46 UTC by muralito ♦2,057 |
| 171737236 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 118) | Nice work! commented 2025-09-11 03:23:00 UTC by aharvey ♦1,790 |
| X | 171751210 (Comments: 1) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 4) | you can add service=driveway to specify the type of service road and also driveway=pipestem to mark it as a shared driveway. commented 2025-09-11 03:08:46 UTC by aharvey ♦1,790 |
 | 171477317 (Comments: 2) | CharliePlett (Discussed changesets: 21) | These numbers are only used internally. There is no ground signage. I debated if I actually wanted to add them, but the folks on the AARoadsWiki Discord encouraged me to add them. You can find the ones I added in this document. https://www.gfd... commented 2025-09-11 02:46:11 UTC by CharliePlett ♦22 |
| 171753345 (Comments: 1) | Gabi Claire gambill (Discussed changesets: 1) | test comment. 👋😆 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171753345 commented 2025-09-11 02:33:10 UTC by buy_osmand ♦127 |
| 171728454 (Comments: 1) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 16) | I went ahead and tagged the stairs as bridge=yes where it overlaps with the section below it. Layer tags on overlapping ways don't really do much without a bridge=* or tunnel=* tag. commented 2025-09-11 02:10:34 UTC by pontificator_extraordinaire ♦15 |
| 171610739 (Comments: 2) | pontificator_extraordinaire (Discussed changesets: 6) | wrong changeset commented 2025-09-11 02:10:23 UTC by pontificator_extraordinaire ♦15 |
| 171760435 (Comments: 1) | Trần Thanh Tuấn (Discussed changesets: 23) | Source: https://web.facebook.com/share/p/1FuY6nkCSS/ commented 2025-09-11 01:29:15 UTC by Trần Thanh Tuấn ♦13 |
| 171277489 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 190) | Roads are classified based on their connectivity rather than their designation, especially since highway designations are often arbitrary in the scope of navigation and tend to reflect which entity maintains the road more than anything (particularly ... commented 2025-09-11 01:29:07 UTC by Joseph R P ♦368 |
| 171759214 (Comments: 1) | FE112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, willkommen bei OSM :) Hier fehlt noch ein amenity=fire_station; das war an dem node vorher auch dran. Das building=fire_station ist auch korrekt, aber es könnte ja jetzt zb auch anders genutzt werden, daher ist der amenity Tag wichtig :)... commented 2025-09-11 01:13:09 UTC by dadavid ♦505 |
| 171722745 (Comments: 2) | Gangadi Anusha (Discussed changesets: 1092) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-09-11 00:59:31 UTC by Gangadi Anusha ♦9 |
| 148485068 (Comments: 1) | emiigon (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hola, revertí el cambio efectuado a la calle Puán de Azul, ya que según señalética y ordenanzas es con acento (tal como figuraba) y no sin, como tu modificación. saludos commented 2025-09-10 23:48:16 UTC by Camello_AR ♦17 |
| 60984749 (Comments: 1) | David Crochet (Discussed changesets: 32) | Bonjour, Une discussion est en cours sur le forum concenrant ce (vieux...) changeset et la suppression de la V41, pourriez vous y jeter un oeil ? Merci ! https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/disparition-itineraire-cyclable-v41/36247/... commented 2025-09-10 23:46:41 UTC by Harvesterify ♦44 |
| 171423782 (Comments: 4) | i2004 (Discussed changesets: 63) | ahh commented 2025-09-10 23:43:03 UTC by i2004 ♦141 |
| 171756417 (Comments: 1) | Matt_COB (Discussed changesets: 1) | On OSM, we use the fully expanded suffix for street names ("Berry Branch Ln" should be "Berry Branch Lane", for example) Let me know if you need help fixing this! commented 2025-09-10 23:19:30 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171757659 (Comments: 1) | ChillisFan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. highway=residential is a necessary tag and describes the type of road this is. I readded it for you. commented 2025-09-10 23:16:53 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 34821455 (Comments: 1) | jordan365 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Здравей, от къде намери инфо за този Драгойчев камък? Знам, че близо до ж.к. Лъгът в Троян има защитена местност „Драгойчев камък“ commented 2025-09-10 22:43:05 UTC by ignisf ♦14 |
| 171744210 (Comments: 1) | George S (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, how do you know that the trail is abandoned? commented 2025-09-10 22:36:09 UTC by Mashin ♦571 |
| 171413805 (Comments: 3) | AH9999 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Phil from the DWG here. What sources did you use to double check? commented 2025-09-10 22:28:33 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,388 |
| 171757656 (Comments: 1) | y1da00px6p6u1u17255lczhb712c56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://mastodon.social/@y7q4g4w58aqddw0177ek8ru16lkc4c/115182293598147598 commented 2025-09-10 22:25:12 UTC by y1da00px6p6u1u17255lczhb712c56 ♦1 |
| 171753713 (Comments: 1) | JOAO_PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL CORRENTINA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, I came across your edits in the Correntina, Brazil area. I noticed that you removed some roads such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376999447 and replaced it with new roads https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426903583, https://www... commented 2025-09-10 21:55:05 UTC by Hightide10 ♦9 |
| 171746442 (Comments: 1) | Blue_on_the_time (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please add meaningful changeset comments. "ф" does not qualify. commented 2025-09-10 21:55:00 UTC by zabop ♦16 |
| 171749417 (Comments: 1) | Stefanoesmeris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Stefanoesmeris, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment f... commented 2025-09-10 21:46:23 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171663540 (Comments: 2) | Kurioskuro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nein etwas weiter oben wäre so ein Trinkbrunnen mit Knopf. Bei den Sitzmöglichkeiten commented 2025-09-10 21:36:01 UTC by Kurioskuro ♦1 |
| 170429563 (Comments: 2) | MarkkuK (Discussed changesets: 2) | Toinen, mitä jäin ihmettelemään, oli tuo Santaradan vanhan ratalinjauksen poistaminen. Sinällään se ehkä voisi hyvin olla tagina nykyisessä pyörätiessä, joka kulkee aika tarkkaan sitä l... commented 2025-09-10 21:30:52 UTC by ssundell ♦57 |
| 171748556 (Comments: 2) | pinka2332 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 21:17:17 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171748452 (Comments: 1) | pinka2332 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 21:16:44 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171748399 (Comments: 1) | pinka2332 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 21:16:29 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171748282 (Comments: 1) | pinka2332 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian Oprócz tego nie ma sensu podawania do publicznej wiadomości dokładnego miejsca swojego zamieszkania commented 2025-09-10 21:14:39 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171748074 (Comments: 1) | pinka2332 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 21:13:28 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171747948 (Comments: 1) | pinka2332 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 21:13:22 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171747800 (Comments: 2) | pinka2332 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 21:13:12 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171750433 (Comments: 1) | Ak654321 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Geri alındı. Bu yol mevcutta sadece birkaç mahalleye hizmet ediyor. Çevreyolunun yapılması durumunda primary kategorisine alınabilir lakin şu anda buna gerek yok. commented 2025-09-10 21:08:11 UTC by marmara_editor ♦7 |
| 170353367 (Comments: 1) | Jazko Huida (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moi! Sen verran ehkä kommentoisin, että noita kulkuoikeusmerkintöjä ei välttämättä tarvitse kaikkia merkitä. Esimerkiksi tässä tapauksessa, kun kyseessä on highway=path, lähtökohta... commented 2025-09-10 21:07:21 UTC by ssundell ♦57 |
| 171743178 (Comments: 1) | julsta (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 20:54:00 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171735547 (Comments: 3) | Selim temel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Şu an ücretli olarak seçtim seçeneği ve güncelledim commented 2025-09-10 20:53:56 UTC by Selim temel ♦1 |
| 171749048 (Comments: 2) | Frank Hein 666 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, ich komme mit dem Programm irgendwie nicht parat. Habe es heute zum ersten mal ausprobiert, weil viele Wege in meiner Heimat auf Openstreetmap noch nicht eingetragen sind und habe die Punkte versehentlich hochgeladen. An dieser Stelle ist eine... commented 2025-09-10 20:46:11 UTC by Frank Hein 666 ♦1 |
| 171108252 (Comments: 6) | UtterClutter (Discussed changesets: 24) | Often, F5 simply doesn't cut it. With Brave, I use CTRL+Shift+R commented 2025-09-10 20:45:52 UTC by UtterClutter ♦25 |
| 171525819 (Comments: 1) | Muhmaker (Discussed changesets: 31) | Sehr aufmerksam, danke. commented 2025-09-10 20:44:14 UTC by Im Fokus ♦24 |
| 171732456 (Comments: 3) | the_jandroid (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thank you for your message, no problem. Do not hurry. This can be fixed later, when somebody with JOSM edits the area and gets the warning. I really appreciate that you are adding the protected areas. Thanks commented 2025-09-10 20:42:12 UTC by Strubbl ♦560 |
| 162444562 (Comments: 1) | epxmap (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, why did you change these cycleway sections into sidewalks? Has something changed here? I have reverted the changeset for now. commented 2025-09-10 20:41:59 UTC by HellMap ♦708 |
| 171735754 (Comments: 1) | 0e37f3f9-011a-4758-a3af-8e48bb682153 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 20:38:43 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 146938314 (Comments: 2) | Rublistoi (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, you seem to be correct, it maches Royal Mail adress finder. commented 2025-09-10 20:35:26 UTC by Rublistoi ♦2 |
| 160455769 (Comments: 5) | raphaelmirc (Discussed changesets: 40) | Portaria isso mesmo que não tem nada a ver a minha edição com a igreja que você mapeia, talvez por eu ter mapeado boa parte da cidade você esteja vendo esse comentário de outro mapeamento que não e o map... commented 2025-09-10 20:19:24 UTC by raphaelmirc ♦41 |
| 171665693 (Comments: 1) | Chibrwulk (Discussed changesets: 2) | не надо это делать. Эти теги только если нет "ребра" дороги, линии. Откачу. commented 2025-09-10 19:59:05 UTC by literan ♦6,781 |
| 160455776 (Comments: 3) | raphaelmirc (Discussed changesets: 40) | Você veio tão direto em querer impor seu ponto de vista que acabou até escrevendo várias coisas erradas. Perguntei qual foi sua intenção ao adicionar a tag #maproulette, mas percebo que não compreende n... commented 2025-09-10 19:49:05 UTC by nascimentoesio ♦2 |
| 171749224 (Comments: 1) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 98) | Zmieniłem też tagowanie cpru tylko zapomniałem dopisać do komentarza :/ commented 2025-09-10 19:41:38 UTC by Yunkers ♦390 |
| 171712820 (Comments: 1) | MK yayıncılık (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tüm harfleri büyük yazmanıza gerek olmadığını düşünüyorum. MK Yayıncılık olması bir problem teşkil ediyor mu? commented 2025-09-10 19:41:20 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171703008 (Comments: 1) | dmho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Du hast hier aber "fee=yes" gelöscht und nicht "highspeed=yes". commented 2025-09-10 19:39:06 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
| 59785810 (Comments: 3) | opendcc (Discussed changesets: 142) | Vielen Dank! commented 2025-09-10 19:38:00 UTC by MK2705 ♦6 |
| 171709754 (Comments: 2) | redd (Discussed changesets: 91) | Änderungen in Fulda habe ich nun geprüft und sind in Ordnung. Dort sind nun mehrere Verklebungen von Straße und Fläche aufgelöst commented 2025-09-10 19:36:58 UTC by redd ♦424 |
| 171750839 (Comments: 1) | kabantecno (Discussed changesets: 6) | Здравствуйте. Вы рисуете по спутниковым снимкам бинг. Они очень старые и в большинтсве случае какие-то другие снимки будут более новыми. ... commented 2025-09-10 19:34:21 UTC by s777n ♦281 |
| 171739284 (Comments: 1) | Emilian2907 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, das Wiki gibt vor: "Kurz- und mittelfristige Sperrungen sollten ausschließlich über bedingte Zugangsregelungen gelöst werden, siehe DE:Conditional_restrictions." Ich hatte hier bereits "access:conditional=no @ (2... commented 2025-09-10 19:34:09 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,916 |
| 171670993 (Comments: 1) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 128) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13130498735. What is the mean of the tag descs = INE-BO 4240604836-D ? commented 2025-09-10 19:31:48 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171752409 (Comments: 1) | lamplanne (Discussed changesets: 2) | All footprints you mapped here represent buildings in imagery. The Western group of buildings is generally more accurate than the Eastern group which is oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building f... commented 2025-09-10 19:31:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171731723 (Comments: 1) | Jehato (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yeni bir bina oluşturmak yerine önceki binayı düzenleyebilirsiniz. Hem böylece elementin geçmişini de korumuş olursunuz. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history commented 2025-09-10 19:28:17 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171733707 (Comments: 1) | markokara (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please follow naming rules. Write Turkish names for name=* tags in Türkiye. You can add English names with name:en=* tag. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization “The default name (occupying the &ls... commented 2025-09-10 19:26:12 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171746618 (Comments: 1) | H-M-T (Discussed changesets: 3) | Lütfen bir önceki değişiklik setine yazmış olduğum yorumu okuyun. Ayrıca landuse=residental olan alanlar yerleşim yerini belirtiyor onları kaldırmayın. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171653343 commented 2025-09-10 19:20:51 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171723397 (Comments: 1) | Żyżunio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jakie źródło? No i to raczej nie powinno być w `name`, a prędzej `ref` jak te co już były. commented 2025-09-10 19:15:42 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 171731239 (Comments: 1) | DreiFarben (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi :) auch wenn es dir schon mindestens zwei mal nahegelegt wurde: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix Warum? Darum: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history Auch OsmAnd erlaubt das feiner... commented 2025-09-10 19:13:34 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 115877582 (Comments: 3) | defikarte_app (Discussed changesets: 68) | Ich habe den Defi an den wahrscheinlich einstellen Ort bewegt, jedenfalls dort wo die Telefonnummer stimmt. commented 2025-09-10 19:10:54 UTC by habi ♦1,883 |
| 171728153 (Comments: 1) | 95927717 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi :) POI wie Geschäfte und Firmen sollten am besten getrennt vom Gebäude erfasst werden. Also entweder als einzelner node an der Stelle, wo quasi das Wichtigste des POI zu finden ist oder die gesamte Betriebsfläche erfassen. PO... commented 2025-09-10 19:07:00 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 163274839 (Comments: 2) | defikarte_app (Discussed changesets: 68) | Das kann ich mir erklären. Wir hatten in einer Version der App mal einen Bug der die GPS Location nicht überprüft, resp. nachgezogen hat. commented 2025-09-10 19:06:51 UTC by chnuessli ♦109 |
| 171708966 (Comments: 1) | 95927717 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi :) du hast hier alle neuen Zufahrten mit dem Umriss des Hofes verbunden. Tu sowas bitte nicht. Wege und landuse sollten nicht verbunden werden. Die Zufahrten im hinteren Hofbereich sollten vielleicht auch noch "service=driveway&... commented 2025-09-10 19:03:16 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171679469 (Comments: 2) | gncrK (Discussed changesets: 9) | Oh, thanks for the information, it was supposed to be the ‘name’ tag. I've already corrected it. commented 2025-09-10 18:59:23 UTC by gncrK ♦3 |
| 171750716 (Comments: 1) | JonaClaudio (Discussed changesets: 1) | The footpritns you added here all appear valid but some are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you... commented 2025-09-10 18:56:23 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171670081 (Comments: 1) | SimranChangani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! If you do not want to mark each street lamp individually as a separate point, simply set the key lit=yes. commented 2025-09-10 18:55:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171750720 (Comments: 1) | PiumaLuna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! some of the footprints you added are very accurate and I could not have done a better job myself, others however are oversized and are not squared when they should be. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately.... commented 2025-09-10 18:53:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171706866 (Comments: 1) | GraceRobinson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey welcome to OSM! These ways through parking lots were actually mapped correctly. Check out other examples if you are unsure about how to map things. Thanks! commented 2025-09-10 18:49:56 UTC by MassCartog ♦152 |
| 171750725 (Comments: 1) | Innocent_Toepper (Discussed changesets: 1) | The vast majority of building footprints you mapped here are really accurate. Remember to exclude the shadow a building casts from its footprint shape and map the footprint slightly smaller than the roof you see in imagery. Good job on improving the... commented 2025-09-10 18:49:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171672637 (Comments: 2) | trigpoint (Discussed changesets: 71) | Yes, a typo, adjacent keys. Fixed. Thank you commented 2025-09-10 18:48:02 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,388 |
 | 171714270 (Comments: 1) | jxgdxghx (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please make the buildings squared (right-click on building). Thank you. commented 2025-09-10 18:46:34 UTC by StarTrek2 ♦12 |
| 171648576 (Comments: 1) | Malinovsky (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szanowny Panie Malinovsky w tym miejscu nie jest budowana droga a wyłącznie zjazd z ul. Dworcowej na tereny inwestycyjne. Przebieg już zaprojektowanej drogi lokalnej jest inny niż Pan sobie wyobraża. Pana praca w znacznej części jest do natych... commented 2025-09-10 18:43:33 UTC by mark2525 ♦22 |
| 171621964 (Comments: 1) | Tampere_joli (Discussed changesets: 9) | Onko tässä kävelyn kieltävät liikennemerkit? Huomasin samalla että koko hervanan valtaväylä on foot=no, vaikka tietääkseni kävelyä kieltäviä liikennemerkkejä ei ole ku... commented 2025-09-10 18:43:24 UTC by Sakari_N ♦77 |
| 171748617 (Comments: 1) | flaviaBle (Discussed changesets: 2) | The vast majority of footprints you mapped here are valid however one may be enveloping two buildings and another may infact represent a barrier like a fence or wall (I flagged these). Otherwise remember to square footpritns when appropriate. |
| 167668079 (Comments: 4) | Viavia1001001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, merci pour l'info commented 2025-09-10 18:40:41 UTC by MDe ♦12 |
| 171747479 (Comments: 9) | nve-makes-maps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke.... maar dat tourism=chalet is geen beschrijving van een gebouw maar de functie... De buildingtag heb ik verwijderd van het vlak. Dat was niet correct. Die functie levert geen gebouw op. Maar ik ben wel eens dat er een beter tag zo... commented 2025-09-10 18:37:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171748602 (Comments: 1) | geopaules (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi all of the footpritns you mapped represent buildings though some are slightly oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps.... commented 2025-09-10 18:35:38 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748587 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | This looks like an improvement from your previous contributions. Some of these building footprints are very accurate and I could not have mapped them better myself. Others are slightly oversized or have needlessly complex shapes. Try mapping ... commented 2025-09-10 18:33:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171741531 (Comments: 1) | matdev (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-09-10 18:32:21 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
 | 171013947 (Comments: 4) | brinnnnnn (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, reverted. commented 2025-09-10 18:28:01 UTC by scabiosa_trenta ♦11 |
| 171748571 (Comments: 1) | RCD49 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Good job spotting these footprints! Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/ ... commented 2025-09-10 18:26:19 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748547 (Comments: 1) | lamplanne (Discussed changesets: 2) | The footprintd you added here are all valid and quite accurate. The shapes are correct but they tend to be oversized. Try mapping the footpritns slightly smaller than the roof you see in the imagery. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to ex... commented 2025-09-10 18:24:43 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171641635 (Comments: 1) | Gruppe-913 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi :) bei Firmen ist es hilfreicher, wenn für die Firma entweder die gesamte Betriebsfläche oder nur ein einzelner Punkt genutzt wird. Den FIrmennamen ohne weitere Details an den Gebäudeumriss zu schreiben ist die schlechteste L... commented 2025-09-10 18:22:48 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,592 |
| 171748546 (Comments: 1) | Noortjevdam (Discussed changesets: 2) | See how I mapped some of the footprints here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171750127 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon.... commented 2025-09-10 18:22:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748513 (Comments: 1) | sg17843 (Discussed changesets: 7) | The footprints you mapped here are generally valid and accurate, consider mapping them slightly smaller than the roof. See how I mapped a couple of the buildings here in Changeset: 171749837 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA |
| 124446875 (Comments: 3) | Jgaordhelagenornres (Discussed changesets: 28) | Super, vielen Dank! lg commented 2025-09-10 18:11:53 UTC by Woazboat ♦83 |
| 171748496 (Comments: 1) | Farbfernseher91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The footprints here are generally valid but a good proportion are oversized and include the building's shadow in the footprint's size. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid popula... commented 2025-09-10 18:08:21 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 159543527 (Comments: 3) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 75) | Vielleicht für Rad-Routen!!! Auf 100 km Wanderweg kannst du gerne 1000-1500 Stück für einen einzelnen Weg aufnehmen commented 2025-09-10 18:07:41 UTC by DeFra85 ♦245 |
| 171749032 (Comments: 1) | elgra (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted due to vandalism Wijzigingenset #171749548 commented 2025-09-10 18:07:19 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171749074 (Comments: 1) | elgra (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted due to vandalism Wijzigingenset #171749476 commented 2025-09-10 18:06:06 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171748424 (Comments: 1) | ryansnooker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you identified buildings here but the footprints you mapped are not as accurarte as they could be and the footprints should have been squared. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid pop... commented 2025-09-10 18:05:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171749114 (Comments: 1) | elgra (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted commented 2025-09-10 18:05:06 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171749232 (Comments: 1) | elgra (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted due to vandalism by #171749375 commented 2025-09-10 18:04:37 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171748419 (Comments: 2) | chrisble (Discussed changesets: 1) | If I understand you correctly then please add these hashtags to your changeset comment when you save/upload to keep track of the mapathon stats. It is not reasonable to apply them to the project as a whole becasue there is much activity not associate... commented 2025-09-10 18:03:49 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748155 (Comments: 1) | RCD49 (Discussed changesets: 10) | These look like valid and accurate footprints to be. good job identifying the Southern one since it looks like a tree is obscuring its shadow. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from... commented 2025-09-10 17:59:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748247 (Comments: 1) | remimage (Discussed changesets: 13) | Valid footprints, though ever so slightly oversized. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://o... commented 2025-09-10 17:56:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748254 (Comments: 1) | Noortjevdam (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Noort, you identified and mapped the buildings here quite well, though they could be slightly smaller and you enveloped two buildings with the footprint I flagged. Pay attention to shadows to better tell where one building ends and another begins.... commented 2025-09-10 17:55:05 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171743536 (Comments: 1) | syenit (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-09-10 17:53:22 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171744259 (Comments: 1) | DPD-Joure (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. Svp niet dubbel taggen. Ik haal één naam weer weg. MVG, Eggie Namens d... commented 2025-09-10 17:52:37 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171743042 (Comments: 1) | Anna Savoniuk (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 17:52:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171746841 (Comments: 1) | julsta (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 17:52:01 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171748267 (Comments: 1) | Danica42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Danica, you identified buildings in imagery, but the footprints could be more accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps.... commented 2025-09-10 17:51:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171743582 (Comments: 1) | Viktoriia Vitruk (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 17:51:08 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 169836330 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 121) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 17:50:33 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171746177 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 121) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 17:50:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171748286 (Comments: 1) | flaviaBle (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Flavia, you identified buildings in the imagery and mapped most of them quite well but there are a couple with rather unique shapes that should be square. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpri... commented 2025-09-10 17:49:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 163949404 (Comments: 2) | CAI-AP (Discussed changesets: 2) | ...oppure seleziona l'edificio e premi Q sulla tastiera, se ti rimane più comodo. Con M puoi invece spostarlo e con R puoi ruotarlo. Ciao ! commented 2025-09-10 17:48:17 UTC by dp7 ♦44 |
 | 171748095 (Comments: 1) | Ramazan Shazadaev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Ramazan Shazadaev, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the commen... commented 2025-09-10 17:47:01 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171748130 (Comments: 1) | Farbfernseher91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Farb, you identified buildings in the imagery and shaped them correctly but the imagery allows for some of them to be more accurate; generally they are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building ... commented 2025-09-10 17:46:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171605020 (Comments: 2) | dmfr (Discussed changesets: 17) | It's an error, just fixed it. Thank you! commented 2025-09-10 17:45:20 UTC by dmfr ♦56 |
| 171748151 (Comments: 1) | lena_re (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Lena, you added a valid and accurate footprint here. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https:... commented 2025-09-10 17:43:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171743313 (Comments: 1) | WELT-Verbesserer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Zu den Parkplätzen mit amenity=parking_space: Dieses Tagging dient der Ergänzung von amenity=parking, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parki... commented 2025-09-10 17:42:09 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 171740985 (Comments: 6) | OneWheelMapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Tak for et nede på jorden svar 😄 Bruger nok lige lidt tid på at prøve at fikse så mange fejl jeg kan i mit lille fuck up her, og så skal jeg nok bruge forummet i fremtiden før jeg går igang med et sto... commented 2025-09-10 17:38:53 UTC by OneWheelMapper ♦5 |
| 171747128 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, you identified and mapped some buildings accurately here, however others inappropriately share nodes with others, have not been appropriately shaped or envelope multiple buildings visible in imagery. I flagged some footprints here I think could b... commented 2025-09-10 17:33:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171686350 (Comments: 3) | aTarom (Discussed changesets: 27) | Sorry, I discovered that the issue was from the changeset before yours. I tried to fix it now. As far as i know there is no need to draw anything other that ocean coasts/ocean islets in the correct direction. But there are no harm in doing it. commented 2025-09-10 17:32:41 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦608 |
| 171642801 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 123) | Fixed it! commented 2025-09-10 17:23:59 UTC by Omnific ♦206 |
| 111716174 (Comments: 5) | mappolaf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Super, danke für deine Antwort! Wenn das Schild mittlerweile entfernt wurde und sogar das Metallgitter angebracht wurde, dann passt es ja genau wie es hier eingetragen ist mit "Trinkwasser" :-) commented 2025-09-10 17:23:37 UTC by Jan-Trinkwasser ♦2 |
| 171745050 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | This footprit is in fact square. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a m... commented 2025-09-10 17:17:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171742553 (Comments: 1) | august32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you correctly identified, tagged and squared building footprints. Most are quite accurate but the imagery allows for some to be more so. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population... commented 2025-09-10 17:17:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171696812 (Comments: 5) | TomHagen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jestem Gryficzninem od urodzenia i tu poszedłem na pewniaka ;), bo to zawsze była Sportowa, a tu taka niespodzianka. Sprawdzę przy najbliższej okazji. commented 2025-09-10 17:10:45 UTC by TomHagen ♦1 |
| 171744993 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | You generally identified buildings in the imagery here but they imagery allows their footpritns to be mapped more accurately. Zoom in and out to aid your interpretation and consider the roof shape of the buildings you're mapping. When map... commented 2025-09-10 17:06:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171743907 (Comments: 1) | rs@6 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 16:52:48 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171742646 (Comments: 1) | julsta (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-10 16:52:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 171743028 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | You added valid and accurate footpritns here. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.o... commented 2025-09-10 16:51:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171743052 (Comments: 1) | Flynn Marquardt (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please, do you mind to stop fixing the borders? I'm working as well with lower level boundaries in Asturias, and we're overwritting each other. I will fix them all afterwards. In case you detect something wrong left behind, please wait a... commented 2025-09-10 16:51:21 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦185 |
| 171744557 (Comments: 1) | Måns Dahl (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, you identified buildings here, but the imagery allows them to be more accurate. Zoom in and out to better interpret the imagery. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estima... commented 2025-09-10 16:45:11 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 152246925 (Comments: 5) | stepha380 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, est-ce que depuis cela a évolué ? commented 2025-09-10 16:42:50 UTC by K12230LF ♦16 |
| 160937013 (Comments: 4) | Fred1717 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Gerne, ich kann mich morgen mal darum kümmern. commented 2025-09-10 16:41:32 UTC by Fred1717 ♦4 |
| 171546117 (Comments: 1) | bartfpl (Discussed changesets: 8) | I think that entrance https://osm.org/node/12844762288 is placed at level=0. Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/171745578. Please let me know if you think that level should stay = 1. commented 2025-09-10 16:38:04 UTC by Alexey Vazhnov ♦165 |
| 164419043 (Comments: 3) | Brummelwuff (Discussed changesets: 19) | Weiterhin gesperrt. Endet im Südwesten in der Baustelle, wird wohl noch bis die Rampe fertig ist gesperrt bleiben. commented 2025-09-10 16:37:59 UTC by Brummelwuff ♦83 |
| 171727079 (Comments: 2) | openstreetmap_user27496017 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Thanks for adding relevant informaton about places. Just a little note: please add phone number with the country code. I'll fix here. commented 2025-09-10 16:34:46 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦179 |
| 171692392 (Comments: 2) | rza31 (Discussed changesets: 36) | 你好，你使用的是「ID」。在「JOSM」中，building=no 和 area=yes 在驗證器中被標記為非必要，並會在修復時自動刪除。 commented 2025-09-10 16:19:33 UTC by rza31 ♦59 |
| 171743658 (Comments: 1) | EnriqueG07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you generally correctly identified buildings in the imagery and tagged them correctly, but they could be more accuate. I have some feedback for you so that you can improve your future contributions. The circular building you added actuall... commented 2025-09-10 16:18:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171376079 (Comments: 10) | OneWheelMapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Spørg hvis du er i tvivl, ellers hold dig i udgangspunktet til retningslinierne. commented 2025-09-10 16:16:28 UTC by kortgodt ♦110 |
| 171738491 (Comments: 2) | Kraan46 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Sorry, only reading this comment already feels like a waste of time and delays progress. I know how to map a building with the available imagery quality. This is not motivating at all. commented 2025-09-10 16:14:51 UTC by Kraan46 ♦24 |
| 171731317 (Comments: 2) | s1m0n379 (Discussed changesets: 4) | ciao, ti ringrazio per la precisazione! ti spiego cosa ho fatto in breve: ho aggiunto la ciclopedonale perchè non era segnalata sulla mappa (l'ho provata fisicamente pedalando e registrando con garmin), guardando dall' app di komoot ... commented 2025-09-10 16:13:56 UTC by s1m0n379 ♦2 |
| 171738181 (Comments: 3) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | De 'geit-die-bijt' noemen m'n kleinkinderen dat dierenkampje. :) commented 2025-09-10 15:56:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171086117 (Comments: 6) | pfg21 (Discussed changesets: 21) | когда правок в пакете сотни и тысячи. какой либо комментарий написать трудно. commented 2025-09-10 15:54:52 UTC by pfg21 ♦129 |
| 171663900 (Comments: 3) | gd-wg (Discussed changesets: 14) | Done! commented 2025-09-10 15:53:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171679237 (Comments: 4) | Una tantum (Discussed changesets: 11) | Si tratta di una fonte con lavatoio posta all'esterno del paese in corrispondenza di una sorgente, con funzione originaria più "tecnica" che decorativa. E' stata restaurata recentemente e non ci sono cartelli di acqua non p... commented 2025-09-10 15:50:41 UTC by dp7 ♦44 |
| 171652304 (Comments: 1) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 128) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/5401610667. What is the mean of the tag Minedu = Minedu 81450018? commented 2025-09-10 15:44:05 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171665356 (Comments: 1) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 128) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/191884427. What is the mean of the tag max = 30? commented 2025-09-10 15:41:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171638464 (Comments: 1) | pingsler (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/249123916. What is the mean of the tag none = DE:urban? commented 2025-09-10 15:40:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171741864 (Comments: 1) | Practical | Excellence in Finance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM... Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. Probeer in het vervolg de bestaande adresnode te gebruiken. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-10 15:37:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 163708704 (Comments: 11) | Rik68mi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sì, poi sono mappate male anche varie strade purtroppo; ci si mettono anche i lavori della MM4. commented 2025-09-10 15:36:34 UTC by Rik68mi ♦1 |
| 171679646 (Comments: 7) | Una tantum (Discussed changesets: 11) | Grazie per la risposta e per i dettagli. Non preoccuparti per gli errori, ci sta e li faccio anch'io ! 😉 Quanto alla farfalla, probabilmente avevi premuto inavvertitamente T o Y sulla tastiera (o tasto dx del mouse), ribaltando gli oggetti... commented 2025-09-10 15:33:39 UTC by dp7 ♦44 |
| 164014723 (Comments: 3) | Kartibu (Discussed changesets: 7) | ich hab mal angefangen, eine Fährroute einzutragen. Ob das so stimmt? mal sehen. evtl fällt mir ja noch was besseres ein. Weiter viel Freude am mappen! commented 2025-09-10 15:33:38 UTC by Senihtu ♦95 |
| 171662532 (Comments: 1) | Niken PMI (Discussed changesets: 3) | Halo Mba Niken, saya izin kasih saran🙏, buat tagging ID desa boleh banget mba pake key ref:ID:kemendagri=* atau ref:ID:BPS=* , soalnya akan sangat membantu buat menunjang infrastruktur data desa kita dengan nulisnya lengkap dalam satu tag. Trims ^... commented 2025-09-10 15:26:47 UTC by diodaix ♦9 |
| 171741988 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #171742031 commented 2025-09-10 15:26:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171741942 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted by changeset #171741979 commented 2025-09-10 15:25:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171741637 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted by changeset #171741689 commented 2025-09-10 15:20:17 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171741184 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted commented 2025-09-10 15:19:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171740710 (Comments: 1) | julsta (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian wycofany ze względu na mnogość błędów różnego rodzaju: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171741595 Pozdrawiam commented 2025-09-10 15:18:42 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171741231 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted commented 2025-09-10 15:18:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 158074243 (Comments: 2) | skumarchandela_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, Baloo Uriza! My name is Sumit and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. You are absolutely right. I shouldn’t add name on the whole way. My apologies. I will be more attentive when pus... commented 2025-09-10 15:17:53 UTC by skumarchandela_lyft ♦6 |
| 171741275 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted by changeset #171741529 commented 2025-09-10 15:17:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171741352 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted by changeset #171741470 commented 2025-09-10 15:15:47 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171740718 (Comments: 2) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Even ter info: Het vernielen van een database kan zowel strafrechtelijke sancties (zoals gevangenisstraf en boetes op basis van artikel 350a Wetboek van Strafrecht) als bestuursrechtelijke sancties (boetes en dwangsommen van de Autoriteit Per... commented 2025-09-10 15:09:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171740096 (Comments: 1) | Zazio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Zazio Il ne faut supprimer les chemins privés mais ajouter la tag access=private sur les chemins concernés Bonne journée commented 2025-09-10 15:09:38 UTC by HugoC01 ♦42 |
| 171740376 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted due to vandalism by changeset #171741002 commented 2025-09-10 15:06:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171740505 (Comments: 1) | Osama bin Laden 911 (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted du to vandalism by changeset #171740933 commented 2025-09-10 15:04:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
 | 166914824 (Comments: 4) | themi97 (Discussed changesets: 19) | I don't know what's wrong at your end but to me all of the entrances are showing except the one for IKEA which I added commented 2025-09-10 15:02:42 UTC by themi97 ♦9 |
| 171740724 (Comments: 1) | Braadpan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Toelichting review_requested: dit is mijn eerste edit die relaties (routes) aanpast. Ik heb alles zorgvuldig nagekeken in JOSM en volgens mij kloppen de aanpassingen zo, maar een extra paar ogen erop kan geen kwaad, lijkt me. Verder is highway=bridle... commented 2025-09-10 15:00:26 UTC by Braadpan ♦7 |
| 118655578 (Comments: 1) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 456) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9589237240 "Punkt noclegowy dla Ukraińców przy OSP Siewierz" nadal istnieje? commented 2025-09-10 14:40:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 143882865 (Comments: 3) | Cenyr (Discussed changesets: 5) | ist weg :-) Änderungssatz #: 171739734 commented 2025-09-10 14:38:53 UTC by Senihtu ♦95 |
| 170900133 (Comments: 1) | LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. According to Onze taal, it should be IJzer, both i and j capitalized. I believe here in OSM it should be according to those rules. See: https://onzetaal.nl/taalloket/ijsland-ijsland Could you elabo... commented 2025-09-10 14:38:21 UTC by VLD549 ♦294 |
| 169555114 (Comments: 3) | gueggeli (Discussed changesets: 5) | Mersi für die Korrektur! Happy mapping, habi commented 2025-09-10 14:35:46 UTC by habi ♦1,883 |
| 171728765 (Comments: 3) | Mildtrashpanda (Discussed changesets: 1) | The alignment on the second load of houses you added looks fine. Basically you need to align property boundaries to the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay, as that’s a source of ground truth about alignment. The aerial imagery can be offset by up ... commented 2025-09-10 14:34:00 UTC by gurglypipe ♦915 |
| 166297163 (Comments: 6) | Metlinec (Discussed changesets: 2) | Владимир, спасибо, что подправили. commented 2025-09-10 14:31:49 UTC by Metlinec ♦1 |
| 171702119 (Comments: 3) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Główny powód to brak renderu na carto (domyślnym stylu mapy) z powodu lobbowania przez samych deweloperów. Jeżeli uda się przejąć na mapy wektorowe, to może zrobimy dyskusję wśród społeczności, żeby zacząć u... commented 2025-09-10 14:24:39 UTC by pavvv ♦550 |
| 171737470 (Comments: 1) | k2101 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428689582<... commented 2025-09-10 14:22:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 163479782 (Comments: 2) | 35bf6131de (Discussed changesets: 1) | Actually, I'm not sure where the bookshop PoI came from—I was only trying to add the New Theatre https://newtheatre-peterborough.com/ commented 2025-09-10 14:19:13 UTC by 35bf6131de ♦1 |
| 171737711 (Comments: 1) | luisforte (Discussed changesets: 16) | Error that originated large bbox solved in changeset #171738517 commented 2025-09-10 14:15:06 UTC by luisforte ♦133 |
| 171642928 (Comments: 8) | Cyrille37 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Cyrille37, We will see if it is possible for our team to make such adjustments, and if available, we will adjust them. Thanks. Regards, nona mostafa commented 2025-09-10 14:06:04 UTC by nona mostafa ♦61 |
| 171729948 (Comments: 4) | Senihtu (Discussed changesets: 41) | Wessen Schuld das war ist mir egal (solange ich es nicht war). Hauptsache, der der es flickt weiß was er tut. (ich hoffe zu wissen, was ich tue...) weiter Freude am mappen! commented 2025-09-10 14:04:38 UTC by Senihtu ♦95 |
| 171690052 (Comments: 1) | edvac (Discussed changesets: 16) | A 26 metros al este había ya una pareada mapeada. ¿La que añadiste en este cambio será duplicada? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171690052 ... commented 2025-09-10 13:57:13 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦347 |
| 139831589 (Comments: 1) | notzfc (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin! Als ich heute den offiziellen Gleisplan der LPA (https://bekanntmachungen.luebeck.de/dokumente/d/568/inline) mit den OSM-Daten verglich bemerkte ich die fehlende Verbindungsschiene https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1197731176. Offensichtlich... commented 2025-09-10 13:56:45 UTC by wolfshafen ♦20 |
| 171703611 (Comments: 4) | Fundación Endémica (Discussed changesets: 1) | Si, estoy pasando el mapa para impresión y luego dejaré todos los nombres de lugares que faltan aquí. commented 2025-09-10 13:46:09 UTC by Fundación Endémica ♦1 |
| 171736908 (Comments: 1) | Braadpan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Even toelichten gezien de historie van een aantal van de verwijderde paden: hertaggen als disused lijkt me hier niet nodig, aangezien geen van de verwijderde paden nog herkenbaar is als pad. De kans op opnieuw intekenen lijkt me daarom verwaarloosbaa... commented 2025-09-10 13:43:40 UTC by Braadpan ♦7 |
| 171726208 (Comments: 2) | DimaLebedev (Discussed changesets: 3) | clarification: Added missing roads and relations according to Bing Maps Aerial and Bing Streetside #mapbox_linters --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171726208 commented 2025-09-10 13:39:41 UTC by DimaLebedev ♦3 |
| 171736381 (Comments: 1) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Source: local knowledge commented 2025-09-10 13:27:51 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 154299658 (Comments: 4) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 118) | sure, updated commented 2025-09-10 13:02:18 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦404 |
| 115955947 (Comments: 4) | grin (Discussed changesets: 28) | Pince: man_made=cellar_entrance, bánya (vízszintes tárója): man_made=adit Ugyanakkor egy kőfejtőben is lehet barlangbejárat (sőt, számosat úgy találtak meg, hogy bányász&... commented 2025-09-10 12:49:09 UTC by ITineris ♦385 |
| 171317633 (Comments: 1) | Blütenkirsche (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, Bei Rahnhorst trägt man üblicherweise nur addr:place=Rahnhorst ein. Meist gibt es keine Strasse mit dem Namen weil der Ort bereits den Namen trägt. Die Hausnummer ist dann dem Ort zugeordnet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2025-09-10 12:37:10 UTC by mtmail ♦153 |
| 165564693 (Comments: 11) | themi97 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Just a quick note: the Cyprus guidelines were written by themi97. I’m not sure whether they were discussed with the mapping community beforehand. commented 2025-09-10 12:28:54 UTC by Layft Greater ♦172 |
| 171498362 (Comments: 4) | OneWheelMapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hvis cykelstien er i direkte forbindelse med vejen bør den som udgangspunkt markeres som cycleway=track på selve vejen. commented 2025-09-10 12:26:44 UTC by kortgodt ♦110 |
| 171705661 (Comments: 1) | JOAO_PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL CORRENTINA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Olá JOAO_PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL CORRENTINA, Bem-vindo ao OSM. Por que você deletou todas essas ruas? santamariense commented 2025-09-10 12:24:15 UTC by santamariense ♦823 |
| 163993891 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 872) | OK, wie in der Note geschrieben wollte ich eh mal hinfahren um zu schauen ob die wirklich so laut sind... ;-) commented 2025-09-10 12:22:06 UTC by chris66 ♦400 |
| 165791160 (Comments: 4) | Layft Greater (Discussed changesets: 56) | yes a number was missing. commented 2025-09-10 12:21:48 UTC by Layft Greater ♦172 |
| 151871147 (Comments: 1) | Holsch (Discussed changesets: 1) | bicycle=no bedeutet, dass jetzt Radfahren verboten ist. Was ist die source dieses Eintrags? Stehen an beiden Enden des Wegs permanente Verbotsschilder? commented 2025-09-10 12:08:52 UTC by yves klein ♦23 |
| 171006496 (Comments: 2) | Senihtu (Discussed changesets: 41) | Laut PTv2 (genauer https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/HE/DE-HE-RMV-Analysis.html) sollte eine Rouet mit der ersten stop_position beginnen und mit der letzten stop_position enden. Die Fahrgäste fahren ja nicht mit in die Wendeanlage. commented 2025-09-10 12:04:09 UTC by Senihtu ♦95 |
| 170123312 (Comments: 7) | ghaefele (Discussed changesets: 14) | Abgesehen von der in diesem CS betreffenden Gegend, wäre es schön wenn ihre eure Ansicht bzgl. Relevanz zur Aufnahme eines Gipfels/Sattles auch im Forum teilt, danke: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wann-soll-man-gipfel-und-bergsat... commented 2025-09-10 12:04:01 UTC by PPete2 ♦126 |
| 171683041 (Comments: 2) | MVG_MLI (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sehr merkwürdig, nach dem Import aktuelle karte, können wir unsere Georeferenzierung nicht mehr so über den HBF führen wie vorher. commented 2025-09-10 12:03:27 UTC by MVG_MLI ♦2 |
| 160390233 (Comments: 6) | kuhni74 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Abgesehen von der in diesem CS betreffenden Gegend, wäre es schön wenn ihre eure Ansicht bzgl. Relevanz zur Aufnahme eines Gipfels/Sattles auch im Forum teilt, danke: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wann-soll-man-gipfel-und-bergsat... commented 2025-09-10 12:03:23 UTC by PPete2 ♦126 |
| 171730377 (Comments: 1) | keepright! ler (Discussed changesets: 22) | Merci! commented 2025-09-10 12:03:16 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦403 |
| 103156336 (Comments: 2) | mario98 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fixed commented 2025-09-10 11:55:46 UTC by mario98 ♦3 |
| 171422920 (Comments: 2) | OneWheelMapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | husk ligeledes lysreguleringer når du kortlægger cykelsti i eget trace. commented 2025-09-10 11:47:57 UTC by kortgodt ♦110 |
| 158439782 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Baloo Uriza, My name is Surander, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for sharing your local insights and for removing our edits. Best regards, Surander commented 2025-09-10 11:44:09 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦6 |
| 165263111 (Comments: 1) | Oreg2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! mit diesem Changeset hast Du die Kecskemet Allee in Kecskemet-Allee umbenannt. In Hesse ALKIS wird der Name ohne Bindestrich geschrieben. Bist Du aus der Gegend und weißt, das es auf den Straßenschildern mit Bindestrich ste... commented 2025-09-10 11:32:10 UTC by Senihtu ♦95 |
| 171632368 (Comments: 2) | Aleksander | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 26) | OK, widzę że poprawione - poprzedni mój komentarz nieaktualny. commented 2025-09-10 11:25:44 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦416 |
| 168340732 (Comments: 1) | Joekm (Discussed changesets: 3) | War das Löschen eines Fußweges eines Gebäudes sowie die Verschiebung einer Einfahrt, sodass dieser die Straße kreuzt, wirklich nötig? commented 2025-09-10 11:24:39 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦211 |
| 171690459 (Comments: 1) | Evington (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I have adjusted hgv to destination as trucks can enter but should not cut through. Cheers commented 2025-09-10 11:20:14 UTC by Mashin ♦571 |
| 168349974 (Comments: 1) | Joekm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wenn's ein Wohngebäude ist, warum hattest du den Gebäudetyp (building=apartments d.h. Mehrfamilienhaus) entfernt? commented 2025-09-10 11:19:32 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦211 |
| 171619901 (Comments: 1) | Joekm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Habe deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht, weil einerseits hatte dieser keinen Mehrwert (Weg wurde schon längst als gesperrt eingegeben und Barrieren wurden an den Enden ebenfalls eingetragen) und andererseits hatten diese auch mehre... commented 2025-09-10 11:18:09 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦211 |
| 171707913 (Comments: 1) | fmc_7 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hallo, worauf basiert denn die Information, dass die Pettenkoferstraße nur noch für Taxis freigegeben ist? Wäre dann nicht auch der gesamte Anwohnerverkehr ausgeschlossen und es würde bspw. keinen Parkraum mehr geben? (Als ich... commented 2025-09-10 11:17:37 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦407 |
| 171635696 (Comments: 1) | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (Discussed changesets: 50) | [Français en dessous] I think something went wrong at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427966242: The right primary road should connect to the junction center, not the footway crossing. I’ve fixed the issue for you: https... commented 2025-09-10 11:16:52 UTC by keepright! ler ♦36 |
| 171703869 (Comments: 1) | OneWheelMapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Når du kortlægger cykelstier separat husk belægning samt at slette sti fra vej. commented 2025-09-10 11:14:50 UTC by kortgodt ♦110 |
| 171581253 (Comments: 1) | Flynn Marquardt (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you very much. commented 2025-09-10 10:56:55 UTC by PengualaHeadphones ♦22 |
| 171729244 (Comments: 1) | Frut02 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Elk begin is moeilijk. Je kunt bedrijven toevoegen aan de bestaande adresnodes. Ik heb de info samengevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-10 10:56:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171729050 (Comments: 1) | Frut02 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De kas zal geen adres hebben. 104 zit al op een woonhuis. Ik heb het adres verwijderd. MVG, Eggie Namens de... commented 2025-09-10 10:54:07 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171726029 (Comments: 3) | NetSabeare (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo eggie. Dank voor de verduidelijking, ik zal er om denken. Groetnis, NetSabeare commented 2025-09-10 10:40:22 UTC by NetSabeare ♦7 |
| 171724824 (Comments: 1) | Cameroncounseling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. You business isn't a street crossing! commented 2025-09-10 10:39:43 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 123413440 (Comments: 1) | tobim91 (Discussed changesets: 20) | revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171728627 Der Fahrscheinautomat im Freiburger Hauptbahnhof hatte spätestens im Jahr 2021 bwegt-Branding bekommen. Stattdessen hast du mit diesem mechanischen Edit das falsche brand=... commented 2025-09-10 10:37:56 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,157 |
| 171666013 (Comments: 1) | MWpg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Did you intend to remove the name of the dog park? You can find that name on the city of winnipeg website, so it seems like it is correct. commented 2025-09-10 10:35:17 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦35 |
| 167619066 (Comments: 1) | kjon (Discussed changesets: 157) | reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171728099 Die Fahrscheinautomaten hatten schon im Jahr 2021 bwegt-Branding bekommen. Stattdessen hast du mit diesem mechanischen Edit das falsche brand="Deutsche Bahn" ergänzt.... commented 2025-09-10 10:34:37 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,157 |
| 161386501 (Comments: 5) | whiterisk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo whiterisk Die Daten des SAC sind genau sowenig ohne Einwilligung nutzbar wie eure (siehe eure Nutzungsbedingungen). Klärt dies bitte mit dem SAC ab und dokumentiert dies im OSM wiki, ansonsten müssen wir die entsprechenden &Aum... commented 2025-09-10 10:28:09 UTC by SimonPoole ♦347 |
| 167811740 (Comments: 1) | uftyv (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I wanted to make you aware that this changeset added several dozen nodes without any tags. It might be worth reviewing to confirm the changeset saved as expected. commented 2025-09-10 10:16:24 UTC by Mapiate ♦28 |
| 171404264 (Comments: 3) | LudovicG (Discussed changesets: 23) | I guess we can tag this like delivery services of restaurants, i.e. delivery:partner=Interflora. commented 2025-09-10 10:13:22 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 171664391 (Comments: 1) | Niken PMI (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you used some uncommon tags here, could you explain what they mean? hazard = see_hazard vulnerability = yes commented 2025-09-10 10:10:08 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 171725833 (Comments: 2) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ah oké, ja merkte nu dat ik dan toch iets vergeet, maar liever geen JAVA op mijn computer. Volgende keer beter opletten :) commented 2025-09-10 10:08:37 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 171679487 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM15 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Тут нет здания, непрозрачная стена вокруг мусорного контейнера https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171727748 commented 2025-09-10 10:08:36 UTC by dypa ♦131 |
| 133307414 (Comments: 1) | eddie28 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Changeset: 133307414 done 2023-03-04 commented 2025-09-10 10:07:50 UTC by sloerunner ♦7 |
| 171726096 (Comments: 1) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | review_requested \tyes Oke... commented 2025-09-10 10:02:31 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171723308 (Comments: 5) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ah super handig, ga ik opslaan, dankjewel! commented 2025-09-10 10:00:39 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 171725009 (Comments: 2) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Oeps, aangepast :) commented 2025-09-10 09:59:52 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 171722195 (Comments: 4) | aboc (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ok, la wiki indica anche "Il tipo più frequente di collegamento taglia l'angolo di un incrocio, lasciando una piccola "isola" triangolare tra esso e la carreggiata/corsia", potrebbe essere ambiguo commented 2025-09-10 09:59:36 UTC by aboc ♦10 |
| 171721942 (Comments: 1) | user_8y978a (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao. Qual e' la fonte di questo nome? Grazie, Andrea commented 2025-09-10 09:48:11 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,446 |
| 170915553 (Comments: 3) | smsm1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Np I don't user every door, so... I try to do better with https://mapcomplete.org commented 2025-09-10 09:47:21 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦450 |
| 171726220 (Comments: 2) | Mariana Pesoa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, bom dia :) Sim, parece-me que por agora sim. Verifiquei isso em junho quando voltei a passar de bicicleta no local e confirmei com alguns artigos (ex.: https://lisboaparapessoas.pt/2023/10/17/avenida-de-berna-ciclovia-peticao-meio-milh... commented 2025-09-10 09:44:35 UTC by Mariana Pesoa ♦1 |
| 171706507 (Comments: 1) | Sadrettin (Discussed changesets: 3) | hocam köprüde ufak bir hata olmuş, düzelttim: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171726354 commented 2025-09-10 09:39:02 UTC by tg4567 ♦34 |
| 170211374 (Comments: 8) | joachim-n (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok. We still have the name on the footpath I've added as a way. One other thing that bothers me is that only some of the benches & flower beds show on the standard render -- the pedestrian area seems to be obscuring some of them, but only... commented 2025-09-10 09:21:40 UTC by joachim-n ♦5 |
| 171707938 (Comments: 1) | padvinder (Discussed changesets: 226) | Dag Padvinder, Er is hier geen sprake van een track.. Dat is zo te zien omgeploegd. Zet je svp accesstag op die paden? MVG eggie commented 2025-09-10 09:19:14 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171706880 (Comments: 2) | Dafo43 (Discussed changesets: 56) | fixed now commented 2025-09-10 09:13:49 UTC by Dafo43 ♦35 |
| 171721380 (Comments: 3) | Wout Verkamman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nou... een echt pad wel, maar de oorspronkelijke mapper staat bekend om gewoon vanuit z'n leunstoel alle paden in te tekenen en dan helaas ook zonder accesstags. Hij is al vele malen daarop aangesproken. Zou het in dit geval weg laten.... commented 2025-09-10 09:12:54 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171306088 (Comments: 2) | thopias (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Christoph, vielen Dank für Deine Antwort und Erläuterungen. Gerne greife ich Deine Argumente auf. Vor Ort hängen Schilder mit der Bezeichnung Hünerstraße. Gerne kann ich als Beleg ein aktuelles Foto des Wegnamens z... commented 2025-09-10 09:06:22 UTC by thopias ♦0 |
| 171696806 (Comments: 1) | kabantecno (Discussed changesets: 6) | Здравствуйте. Удалил вашу правку. Чтобы добавить бар недостаточно добавить имя зданию. Вместо этого нужно создать точку и добавить ей ... commented 2025-09-10 08:58:27 UTC by s777n ♦281 |
| 170769868 (Comments: 4) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 63) | We should map what's on the ground. If it has actually started, we should map it as started, even if it's not official. Like if someone built a house without building permission, we should map it even though it's not officially there. commented 2025-09-10 08:50:50 UTC by rhhs ♦144 |
| 171483230 (Comments: 4) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Guten Tag, deine Antwort bezieht sich auf eine Frage, die ich nicht gestellt habe. Es ging nicht um den Zollhofgarten oder die Odessastraße, sondern um diese etwa 300 Meter entfernte Straße (siehe oben), welche du gelöscht hat... commented 2025-09-10 08:38:02 UTC by whb ♦627 |
| 171537908 (Comments: 3) | TibiCsillagda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Elérhetőségem: Tóth Tibor, 7285. Kára, Kossuth 13. +36303812151 mr.tothtibor@gmail.com commented 2025-09-10 08:31:44 UTC by TibiCsillagda ♦1 |
| 171722412 (Comments: 2) | vietnamaccessamerica (Discussed changesets: 1) | Y'all stopped doing this for a good while. Why now again? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171722834 commented 2025-09-10 08:29:34 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,151 |
| 171606411 (Comments: 10) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 30) | Lügen über OSM-Bearbeitungen? Schauen Sie bei der Firma vorbei, überprüfen Sie meine Arbeit und Sie werden eine Bestätigung erhalten. Dieses Misstrauen ist völlig unbegründet. Happy mapping commented 2025-09-10 08:27:34 UTC by Comino ♦140 |
| 171284692 (Comments: 7) | kapazao (Discussed changesets: 68) | Sí, por lo general la gente acostumbra a usarlo de esa forma, pero como te comento el hecho de usar place=* ya implica el area=yes y no es necesario, es sobrante, como añadirlo en la mayoría de elementos de área, pero no t... commented 2025-09-10 08:22:39 UTC by kapazao ♦921 |
| 171624826 (Comments: 2) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Udarian, Thank you for your comments. I referred the following resources and tagged as private according to the community guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=employees?uselang=en https://help.openstreetmap.org/questi... commented 2025-09-10 08:19:37 UTC by Nar_ach ♦10 |
| 34807738 (Comments: 1) | Jojo4u (Discussed changesets: 64) | Hallo Jojo4u, es ist leider schon fast 10 Jahre her, aber Du hast in diesem CS u.a. den Kaufpark Freiberg bearbeitet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376432772/history Ich versuche gerade, Deine Bearbeitungen nachzuvollziehen, da sie m.E. Fehler... commented 2025-09-10 08:18:26 UTC by Mammi71 ♦260 |
| 171624551 (Comments: 2) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Udarian, Thank you for your comments. I referred the following resources and tagged as private according to the community guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=employees?uselang=en https://help.openstreetmap.org/questi... commented 2025-09-10 08:17:52 UTC by Nar_ach ♦10 |
| 171624257 (Comments: 2) | Metauro (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Udarian, The service road within the parking lot already carries the access=private tag, which was prompted by an OSMOSE flag and brought to our attention. The available Mapillary imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=114014654075833&am... commented 2025-09-10 08:11:44 UTC by Metauro ♦6 |
| 171698252 (Comments: 1) | Ignacio Padilla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. Your business isn't a park. commented 2025-09-10 08:08:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171692340 (Comments: 1) | Danysan95 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ciao Danysan95. Questa way 1428313003 non credo sia una serra, stando alle immagini satellitari più recenti. Nelle foto meno recenti sembrerebbe soltanto un telo di copertura stagionale. In ogni caso, per il momento mi sono limitato a sostitui... commented 2025-09-10 08:06:54 UTC by dp7 ♦44 |
| 171717280 (Comments: 1) | Jtjtjtjt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-10 08:04:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171295112 (Comments: 2) | whitepanda (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Leo Slager, Thank you for making the corrections and your valuable feedback. I added the newly constructed geometry to the map and edited the bus routes according to the new geometry as well. I will be more aware about continuity and the or... commented 2025-09-10 07:34:34 UTC by whitepanda ♦7 |
| 171719580 (Comments: 1) | werser22 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Werser.. Je vraagt feedback.Het is moeilijk om een met bomen bedekt water uit te lijnen. De BING foto is vaak verouderd en ligt er op veel plaatsen naast. Gebruik svp de PDOK actueel of een nog recenteren Dat water is allemaal ingem... commented 2025-09-10 07:31:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171706899 (Comments: 1) | dw93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, I've reverted this change and added access=private to define the roads as private. I strongly recommend you read both of these wiki articles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F https://... commented 2025-09-10 07:30:29 UTC by Unarmored5156 ♦55 |
| 171718958 (Comments: 2) | Brandweer_Erik (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard commented 2025-09-10 07:18:25 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171717071 (Comments: 1) | Paul Flo Williams (Discussed changesets: 3) | The house previously marked a house as 30 Downsway is actually 571 Falmer Road. I have corrected this. commented 2025-09-10 07:16:36 UTC by UtterClutter ♦25 |
| 168398087 (Comments: 1) | Sebastian Bleser (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Sebastian, Du hast lobenswerterweise eine große Zahl von Hydranten eingetragen, Danke dafür. Mir ist im Rahmen meiner Qualitätskontrolle aufgefallen, dass alle Deine Hydranten mit "water_source=groundwater" e... commented 2025-09-10 07:13:07 UTC by klik ♦31 |
| 124169960 (Comments: 1) | chnuessli (Discussed changesets: 38) | Ciao chnuessli Die Telefonnummer des Defi verweist auf https://kuenzlerimpuls.ch/, die sind im 16B auf der anderen Strassenseite. Ich habe den Defi dorthin bewegt. Gruss, habi commented 2025-09-10 07:08:01 UTC by habi ♦1,883 |
| 171481286 (Comments: 2) | Grzexs (Discussed changesets: 9) | poprawilem, zamienilem chodnik z rowerem na CPR commented 2025-09-10 07:02:09 UTC by MaciekMma ♦63 |
| 171718393 (Comments: 2) | ntaa14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ada bang langsung datang aja!! commented 2025-09-10 06:56:28 UTC by ntaa14 ♦1 |
| 135727984 (Comments: 3) | stadt-Due-Lengsfeld (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, ich habe Ihr Anliegen bereits an die entsprechende Stelle weiter geleitet. Wir sind in diesem Fall , als Vermessungsamt nur die ausführende Stelle. Auftraggeber ist das Garten-,Friedhofs-, und Forstamt. Der zuständige Sachbearbeit... commented 2025-09-10 06:55:52 UTC by stadt-Due-Lengsfeld ♦2 |
| 171714966 (Comments: 2) | Codarax (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wegen aangepast conform BGT omtrekgericht en Quick Ortho 2025 commented 2025-09-10 06:44:14 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171713040 (Comments: 1) | jnbn05 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I made several alterations to your added footpaths mainly to conform to OSM best practice. There were many crossing but unjoined highways, (footpaths crossing over existing highways unjoined), all fixed. Many plac... commented 2025-09-10 06:26:19 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
 | 171133362 (Comments: 1) | Abn_976 (Discussed changesets: 26) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425574824#map=21/-12.7303205/45.1974160&layers=V You use landuse=beach in addition to natural=beach. Why? landuse=beach is not a valid tag according to the wiki. Vous utilisez landuse=beach en p... commented 2025-09-10 06:19:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,804 |
| 171604935 (Comments: 3) | Una tantum (Discussed changesets: 11) | Quando in chat dicevi "ho controllato ora non c'è nulla con quel valore wikidata" cosa vuoi dire? Vedi https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30028833 commented 2025-09-10 06:16:11 UTC by Una tantum ♦14 |
| 107562066 (Comments: 2) | Jojo222 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Opravil som duplicitne vyznaceny cyklochodnik na chodnik. commented 2025-09-10 06:11:30 UTC by Tomas_J ♦302 |
| 171302842 (Comments: 2) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Спасибо что поправили. Постараюсь не портить commented 2025-09-10 06:08:11 UTC by kosmgeolan ♦2 |
| 171297447 (Comments: 2) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравствуйте. Спасибо за информацию. Исправлено commented 2025-09-10 06:03:00 UTC by kosmgeolan ♦2 |
| 171716546 (Comments: 1) | bcm5645 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-09-10 06:00:56 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171688699 (Comments: 3) | Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (Discussed changesets: 39) | Is opnieuw geïmporteerd. commented 2025-09-10 05:51:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171526752 (Comments: 2) | greensnail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tak. Już to zrobiłem. Fixed commented 2025-09-10 05:49:08 UTC by greensnail ♦1 |
| 171710133 (Comments: 2) | mmusch92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Resolution: see how I mapped the southern highway in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171714549 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710133 commented 2025-09-10 04:14:25 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171713629 (Comments: 1) | stragu (Discussed changesets: 11) | resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4625375 commented 2025-09-10 04:06:38 UTC by stragu ♦27 |
| 171713266 (Comments: 2) | Ricken Lazlo Hale (Discussed changesets: 3) | I flagged a highway here which should have been connected to an existing one. It's important to do this becasue routing algorythms require that highways are connected to function. You can see how I connected them here https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2025-09-10 03:38:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171712863 (Comments: 1) | Ricken Lazlo Hale (Discussed changesets: 3) | All highways you added here look valid accurate and appropriately tagged. Tip: check other imagery sources if the primary one has cloud cover like it does here. Please focus your efforts on highways that link settlements. Thank you for your contribut... commented 2025-09-10 03:01:03 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171713252 (Comments: 1) | Pewter10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Pewter10, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. ... commented 2025-09-10 02:59:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171712256 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 201) | Thank you for adding all of the path details from my notes! I will look into the StreetComplete app. commented 2025-09-10 02:55:23 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦49 |
| 171710706 (Comments: 1) | Raedalus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thank you for submitting a custom changeset comment! Just bear in mind that id you're contributing as part of a project don't strip the hashtags becasue these are used to track proejct stats. You corectly identified highways... commented 2025-09-10 02:43:07 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171712623 (Comments: 1) | Ricken Lazlo Hale (Discussed changesets: 3) | You spotted highways in imagery. You correctly assessed the width of the western two highways but the eastern one is in fact wide enough for a car evidenced by the tracks on the ground. For the puropses of this project please consider whether the hig... commented 2025-09-10 02:30:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171706416 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 190) | Alright then, thanks for the information! commented 2025-09-10 02:26:23 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦79 |
| 171712092 (Comments: 1) | Daritay7 (Discussed changesets: 6) | When mapping highways, please trace their shape accurately. Accurate highways aid navigation and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the width of the highway. The lines you trace to represent highways should follow their ce... commented 2025-09-10 02:23:57 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171711940 (Comments: 1) | Daritay7 (Discussed changesets: 6) | This residential area could be extended north. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.... commented 2025-09-10 02:22:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171683710 (Comments: 1) | nileshbarawkar (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hey @nileshbarawkar, are you really sure that U-turn is possible and allowed here? My edit was based on survey and found that there is no scope for u turn here. commented 2025-09-10 02:22:19 UTC by Arjun kp ♦2 |
| 171711300 (Comments: 2) | Daritay7 (Discussed changesets: 6) | See how I tagged them here https://osmcha.org/changesets/171711518 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171711300 commented 2025-09-10 02:19:35 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171709044 (Comments: 2) | averym615 (Discussed changesets: 1) | see how I mapped these residential areas and place points here https://osmcha.org/changesets/171712273 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171709044 ... commented 2025-09-10 02:11:06 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 156693884 (Comments: 1) | COBAddressing (Discussed changesets: 4) | highway=secondary is not for driveways commented 2025-09-10 02:10:00 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,090 |
| 171711760 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 201) | This is awesome, thanks CurlingMan commented 2025-09-10 01:29:41 UTC by mbeyerle ♦46 |
| 170246323 (Comments: 1) | DawsZed (Discussed changesets: 8) | For self storage places, the name should be added to the larger landuse area or as a node if there is more than one building. commented 2025-09-10 01:10:25 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,058 |
| 171710798 (Comments: 1) | Daritay7 (Discussed changesets: 6) | The tagging of the highway you added looks valid, but I would continue it southward instead of east becasue that looks like the 'main line' of the highway. --- Published using OSMCha: https://os... commented 2025-09-10 01:07:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171711061 (Comments: 1) | Daritay7 (Discussed changesets: 6) | You correctly identified a highway here but it appears wide enough for a car to travel on and could be slightly more accurate. When mapping highways, please trace their shape accurately. Accurate highways aid navigation and prevent issues like data o... commented 2025-09-10 01:04:09 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171293775 (Comments: 1) | Daitruxdd (Discussed changesets: 9) | Is "116 Bayard Street" the actual name? Please provide a source for the name and update accordingly if that isn't the actual name. I advise you to read up on the name wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:... commented 2025-09-10 01:01:12 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,058 |
| 171711226 (Comments: 1) | jtracey (Discussed changesets: 57) | Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4888474 commented 2025-09-10 00:53:40 UTC by jtracey ♦168 |
| 171697295 (Comments: 1) | Jaller (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks a lot. I will be more careful about that. commented 2025-09-10 00:52:19 UTC by Pan ♦55 |
| 171664452 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 365) | Hi, this looks misaligned/poorly drawn, and possibly incorrectly tagged. Can you please review and correct this. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171664452 commented 2025-09-10 00:36:08 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,341 |
| 171710574 (Comments: 1) | Shannon Neusch (Discussed changesets: 1) | You are idenitfying groups of buildings but on a few occasions you tagged areas as place= rather than adding a POI with that tag. The area should be tagged as residential landuse. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM com... commented 2025-09-10 00:35:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171710746 (Comments: 1) | Daritay7 (Discussed changesets: 6) | You correctly tagged the highway you added. PLease follow the centre of highways when mapping them; use more nodes the more the highway curves and try to keep the line data within the width of the road. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to... commented 2025-09-10 00:31:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171710258 (Comments: 1) | Chrissy05 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This highway could be slightly more accurate but it's certainly wide enough for a car. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapat... commented 2025-09-10 00:21:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171710289 (Comments: 1) | slcsean30 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You have correctly identified settlements and highways. The settlements have been correctly tagged but could be at times slightly more accurate (smaller). These highways are more likely uncassified; residential highways are only typic... commented 2025-09-10 00:20:21 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171710305 (Comments: 1) | Friends of MSF KU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! you correctly identified settlements and highways but the residential areas here are incorrectly tagged. The area should be tagged as a residential area and a POI should be tagged with the place value e.g. hamlet. Highways and residen... commented 2025-09-10 00:14:43 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171710325 (Comments: 1) | Egglescake (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! The residential area and place tag look accurate, but the highways you added could be more accurate since highways should follow the centre of paths. Add more nodes on corners and curves. Thank you for your contribution. If you want t... commented 2025-09-10 00:10:26 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171710358 (Comments: 1) | aposes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Do not conect highways and residential areas, hold alt in ID to prevent this. The residential area you mapped in the north is likely a cemetary. Place tags look appropriate. Highways should follow the centre of the road; use more node... commented 2025-09-10 00:06:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171709386 (Comments: 1) | Maysam Elghazali (Discussed changesets: 1) | These residential areas look valid and the place in the NE is correctly mapped. Please take care to map as accuartely as you can; in some areas the residential areas you mapped overlap existing building footpritns. Thank you for your contribution. If... commented 2025-09-09 23:58:53 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 165353794 (Comments: 1) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 159) | Hey, you introduced `shop=tanning_salon` in node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12779868055 The accepted tagging is `shop=beauty`+`beauty=tanning`, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:beauty I've updated the tagging commented 2025-09-09 23:33:59 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦450 |
| 171666681 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 365) | Hi, this is drawn quite poorly, are you able to redraw this to follow the roadways a bit more accurately? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171666681 commented 2025-09-09 23:09:51 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,341 |
| 171663575 (Comments: 3) | drakeerv (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem! Awesome job on adding all these buildings etc. Anthon is looking great! commented 2025-09-09 22:56:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦62 |
| 171669757 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 365) | Hi, is this section actually part of Harrison Avenue, and does this section actually have a speed limit of 50km/h? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171669757 commented 2025-09-09 22:50:43 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,341 |
| 171656649 (Comments: 2) | çokamaçokgizliOSM (Discussed changesets: 2) | 222 güzergahının Ordu Bulvarı kısmını (bildiğim için) düzelttim diğer yerlerde herhangi bir değişiklik yapmadım. commented 2025-09-09 22:42:55 UTC by çokamaçokgizliOSM ♦2 |
| 171685874 (Comments: 1) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, you've ended this at the footpath, not the road, on the southern end. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171685874 commented 2025-09-09 22:23:49 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,341 |
| 171650651 (Comments: 2) | vdrumman (Discussed changesets: 1) | The property is owned by a friend, and is no longer used as an airport despite its appearance, thanks. commented 2025-09-09 22:21:58 UTC by vdrumman ♦1 |
| 171608236 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Olsson_34432 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej och välkommen till OpenStreetMap! Hela byggnaden är inte 38C. I så fall får adressen sättas på individuella ingångar. Jag lägger in det som jag tror det är. commented 2025-09-09 22:11:34 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦608 |
| 171702656 (Comments: 1) | Todeskuh (Discussed changesets: 26) | Danke! commented 2025-09-09 22:08:11 UTC by 0xb7767000 ♦15 |
| 171694067 (Comments: 1) | FerroCarrilOSM (Discussed changesets: 8) | `ref=CPKC` es incorrecto. Para eso tenemos el campo `operator` y ya está puesto. commented 2025-09-09 22:05:07 UTC by Ferrocarriles de México ♦49 |
| 171707884 (Comments: 1) | AShiloh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Some areas were bright white or flat grey and hard to tell if they were buildings or flat paved surfaces. commented 2025-09-09 21:48:54 UTC by AShiloh ♦1 |
| 171652066 (Comments: 1) | PingMars (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you also add a tag to describe the type of business. The editor allows a search for tags. And the wiki at wiki.openstreetmap.org can also help --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... commented 2025-09-09 21:43:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171650111 (Comments: 1) | Pewter10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | turning loop isn't needed when you actually draw the loop. Can you remove it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171650111 commented 2025-09-09 21:30:28 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171612198 (Comments: 1) | floreli (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Leave the address node when removing the business. Hopefully a new business will take over the same address making it easier for the next mapper. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2025-09-09 21:28:39 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171610235 (Comments: 1) | athenianpenguin (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: check out the ESRI World Imagery. Select the background icon then select ESRI World Imagery for more current views. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171610235 ... commented 2025-09-09 21:26:47 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171610180 (Comments: 1) | athenianpenguin (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time with abrevations --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171610180 commented 2025-09-09 21:24:51 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171519071 (Comments: 1) | DudiTheBurkman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia! Ezeket miért toltad odébb? gondolom véletlenül. Legközelebb óvatosabban. Visszavonva. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171707208 commented 2025-09-09 21:18:30 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 171519006 (Comments: 1) | DudiTheBurkman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia! Ezeket miért toltad odébb? gondolom véletlenül. Legközelebb óvatosabban. Visszavonva. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171707208 commented 2025-09-09 21:18:30 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 171519030 (Comments: 1) | DudiTheBurkman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia! Ezzel a szerkesztéssel egész Biatorbágyot parkká alakítottad. Legközelebb óvatosabban. Visszavonva. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171707118 commented 2025-09-09 21:15:08 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 170462417 (Comments: 2) | Mini Camping Damhuis (Discussed changesets: 1) | oke dank u commented 2025-09-09 21:04:31 UTC by Mini Camping Damhuis ♦1 |
| 164472967 (Comments: 1) | Carl Nowack (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Carl! I added gbfs ids to all Bixi station as `ref` this week. Did it manually, did you use some tool to conflate? Just want to figure out if there is a better way to maintain the list commented 2025-09-09 20:51:51 UTC by skfd ♦282 |
| 171702664 (Comments: 2) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Mile widziane, to jest coś co można łatwo przeoczać. Re : Pominania niektórych linii : Może być że nie miałę ich ładowane w JOSMie albo coż. Każdym razie, też poprawiłem te linie. commented 2025-09-09 20:46:21 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦211 |
| 167109087 (Comments: 2) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 37) | pomyłka, w JOSM następna pozycja. już poprawiłem na hydrant z rurociągu miejskiego commented 2025-09-09 20:35:50 UTC by Bartek444 ♦14 |
| 169561828 (Comments: 2) | frabu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ich habe es jetzt repariert (171705852). commented 2025-09-09 20:35:01 UTC by sostock ♦5 |
| 171703267 (Comments: 6) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nog even aangepast naar name=ROC Nijmegen Locatie Marterstraat Zo staat het op de gevel. https://www.roc-nijmegen.nl/locaties/marterstraat commented 2025-09-09 20:30:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171697533 (Comments: 1) | Koreller (Discussed changesets: 17) | 👋 Don't forget to use ESRI images. They are fresher in Russia commented 2025-09-09 20:21:38 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,066 |
| 171652110 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428098234 is not a horse riding centre (leisure=horse_riding), it is a horse riding arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076563747 (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian). See also https://wiki.openstreet... commented 2025-09-09 20:16:38 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦801 |
| 171369615 (Comments: 3) | naiqi (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hola buenas tardes, El puesto en terreno de Comida rápida lo agregué yo mismo según recuerdo, y fue eliminado por los motivos que describí en la edición (no volveré a poner un título tan largo,... commented 2025-09-09 20:12:02 UTC by naiqi ♦5 |
| 53138128 (Comments: 3) | CUSPC (Discussed changesets: 5) | Confermo, ora li vedo correttamente, ottimo. commented 2025-09-09 20:05:14 UTC by Dardy ♦32 |
| 170963705 (Comments: 3) | Constable7065 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Visszavonva ebben az esetben. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171704581 commented 2025-09-09 20:03:06 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 167506023 (Comments: 4) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dnes som si konecne pri ceste okolo spomenul obzriet si to, a ano, naozaj je tam brana. Zakreslil som ju, ale velmi sa mi nechce kreslit cez tu branu nejaku cestu a pripajat to k tym driveways, lebo na tu cast nabrazia auta ani nemaju povoleny... commented 2025-09-09 19:51:24 UTC by ticho2 ♦19 |
| 171642366 (Comments: 7) | rweverwijk (Discussed changesets: 3) | typo key>value commented 2025-09-09 19:50:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171653343 (Comments: 1) | H-M-T (Discussed changesets: 3) | Lütfen yolları kısaltma olmadan ve kelimelerin sadece ilk harfi büyük olacak şekilde haritalandırın. Ayrıca caminin adı "Oyun Yeri Cami" mi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361562045 commented 2025-09-09 19:46:06 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 167777365 (Comments: 2) | defikarte_app (Discussed changesets: 68) | Die Öffnungszeiten erscheinen mir plausibel aufgrund einer Turnhalle. Vermutlich wird nach dem letzten Training dann die Halle abgeschlossen. commented 2025-09-09 19:35:57 UTC by chnuessli ♦109 |
| 171674121 (Comments: 4) | xkillah (Discussed changesets: 9) | idk commented 2025-09-09 19:34:36 UTC by xkillah ♦77 |
| 164970069 (Comments: 2) | defikarte_app (Discussed changesets: 68) | Ja das war ein User-Input. Das wird nicht vorgegeben über unser Formular. commented 2025-09-09 19:32:50 UTC by chnuessli ♦109 |
| 171702704 (Comments: 1) | MateuszD998 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-09-09 19:21:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171456067 (Comments: 1) | allthepotatoes (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera was just moved commented 2025-09-09 19:16:52 UTC by allthepotatoes ♦1 |
| 171695135 (Comments: 3) | rweverwijk (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik heb mij reverts nog even teruggedraaid Ik denk dat sleutel achter seveso bere in UK English kan. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seveso MVG eggie commented 2025-09-09 18:58:14 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171466080 (Comments: 4) | DKK_DK (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://parqo.dk/ commented 2025-09-09 18:41:18 UTC by b-holdet ♦329 |
| 171700328 (Comments: 1) | Knerbert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Eigenlijk is bicycle=yes default en hoef je dus niet toe te voegen. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community<... commented 2025-09-09 18:38:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171687973 (Comments: 6) | Baryeqx (Discussed changesets: 1) | dwukreskowość ftw! commented 2025-09-09 18:29:15 UTC by Yog Sot ♦286 |
| 167259600 (Comments: 3) | AH9999 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Unfortunately, we can't use Google Streetview for licensing reasons (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google ), and any data added as a result of that will need to be reverted and redacted. Was that the source that you used for the chang... commented 2025-09-09 18:29:06 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,434 |
| 171690949 (Comments: 2) | Sandal man (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ups, tens tota la raó, estic confós mirant un mapa diferent. El tornaré a canviar. commented 2025-09-09 18:13:59 UTC by Sandal man ♦394 |
| 171293110 (Comments: 1) | Daitruxdd (Discussed changesets: 9) | Is the name really "705 Joyce Kilmer Avenue" or is that just the placeholder? If you don't have an actual name, please leave it blank. Name is only a name and not an address. commented 2025-09-09 18:13:18 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,058 |
 | 171519484 (Comments: 1) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 118) | Hi gscholz, The area of the river changes frequently - this shape is very roughly a "normal" size of the river, somewhere between its peak in late spring and its minimum in the autumn / winter. It could perhaps be tagged as intermitt... commented 2025-09-09 18:01:20 UTC by Tómas Ingi ♦82 |
| 171603844 (Comments: 2) | MarkLammers21 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Ik heb de tagging hersteld. commented 2025-09-09 17:57:26 UTC by A67-A67 ♦973 |
| 92240069 (Comments: 1) | Waymom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was there a consensus within the local (or even global) community on transforming landuse multipolygons into ways (flat) ? commented 2025-09-09 17:57:06 UTC by jfd553 ♦58 |
| 171636212 (Comments: 5) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 376) | Personally, I would be delighted if we had more consistent naming rules, but with over 91,000 uses and three projects (according to Taginfo), a change is relatively unlikely. commented 2025-09-09 17:53:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171688682 (Comments: 1) | Tombula (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke :) commented 2025-09-09 17:37:57 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,374 |
| 171627219 (Comments: 1) | Mokka2024 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13127683294/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-09-09 17:37:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171342525 (Comments: 1) | spencerandhill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13113938862/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) commented 2025-09-09 17:37:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 168343410 (Comments: 1) | NewtonmoreCup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I was wondering why the brand:wikidata tag has now been prefixed with not: The value is correct for the brand. Adrian commented 2025-09-09 17:28:49 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦10 |
| 151753947 (Comments: 1) | Camille Jeannin (Discussed changesets: 26) | Bonjour. Il semble que, par ce groupe de modifications, vous ayez modifié les bretelles de sortie et d’insertion (highway=motorway_link) pour les faire connecter à l’autoroute (highway=motorway), non pas là o&u... commented 2025-09-09 17:28:41 UTC by Penegal ♦27 |
| 171677303 (Comments: 1) | Jonny_23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich fange mal mit dem einfacheren Teil an, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393482055: Das amenity=fire_station sollte an das Gelände, nicht nur an das Gebäude.... commented 2025-09-09 17:25:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 169418733 (Comments: 2) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 954) | Merci. Il y a 4 pistes de sécurité routière dans la CUA. Geo80 a fait un reportage pour Beaurains. Malheureusement, cela ne vaut pas le brevet du cycliste comme Pro Vélo le fait en Belgique pour apprendre aux... commented 2025-09-09 17:23:35 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦227 |
| 162064201 (Comments: 2) | TeeEn (Discussed changesets: 1) | wait, maybe this edit only split this road? commented 2025-09-09 17:23:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 117621048 (Comments: 1) | UrbanUnPlanner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8963458/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign |
| 125667110 (Comments: 1) | andryxa071 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9993356658/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign |
| 142138835 (Comments: 1) | Revnoplex (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11238024061/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign<... commented 2025-09-09 17:22:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171682671 (Comments: 1) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, in this and other changesets, you have set review_requested=yes. Since you only added ‘wikidata’, what exactly should be reviewed? Best regards commented 2025-09-09 17:13:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 171687809 (Comments: 1) | beate (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Der Fehler wurde nicht von dir verursacht. Schau mal bitte auf die südöstliche Gebäudeecke: Dort schneidet das Gebäude die Straße. Versuche es ruhig... commented 2025-09-09 17:09:55 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
 | 171049674 (Comments: 1) | Balli Abokor (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Balli Abokor, I noticed you reclassified residential and secondary ways to trunk in Somalia. The OSM wiki states the trunk classification is reserved for high importance roads (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk). These... commented 2025-09-09 17:03:29 UTC by aaronq227 ♦14 |
| 171686018 (Comments: 6) | Jeroen Muris (Discussed changesets: 15) | Duidelijk, dank. En ik zal er in de toekomst aan proberen te denken! commented 2025-09-09 16:55:54 UTC by Jeroen Muris ♦10 |
| 164582907 (Comments: 4) | mosaico (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das sind a bissl "spanische Dörfer" für mich. Ich habe mich bei openstreetmap noch nie mit Bildern beschäftigt. Ich verstehe also nicht den Zusammenhang von SALZBURGWIKI und openstreetmap. Auch Mag. Meyer meint, dass es nich... commented 2025-09-09 16:54:16 UTC by mosaico ♦1 |
| 171627252 (Comments: 1) | ZPKWM (Discussed changesets: 7) | Czy można zamykać uwagę? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4842886 commented 2025-09-09 16:41:52 UTC by VA00 ♦599 |
| 171639985 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171695794 commented 2025-09-09 16:37:46 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171676295 (Comments: 1) | Miguering (Discussed changesets: 1) | No corresponde a una reserva natural, simplemente es un jardín con arboles y unas cañas de bambu. commented 2025-09-09 16:37:44 UTC by Juanmi81 ♦1 |
| 171639046 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171695583 commented 2025-09-09 16:32:28 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171654391 (Comments: 1) | Max Ciaone (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ciao Max Ciaone, per le strisce pedonali sarebbe opportuno utilizzare crossing:markings=zebra, anziché il più generico crossing:markings=yes commented 2025-09-09 16:24:08 UTC by totera ♦298 |
| 113629670 (Comments: 1) | Yps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, die Angabe access=agricultural verbietet auch Fußgängern den Zutritt zu den Wegen. Je nach dem welche Schilder an den Wegen angebracht sind kann man vehicle=agricultural; forestry verwenden. Ich nehme auf Grund des taggings ... commented 2025-09-09 16:13:36 UTC by Lokai ♦475 |
| 171636271 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171694565 commented 2025-09-09 16:10:54 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171635024 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171693595 commented 2025-09-09 15:49:56 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171651997 (Comments: 2) | Aim311_ (Discussed changesets: 67) | Tak. Musi być zapewniony dojazd do poszczególnych pól i pomocniczo w celu utrzymania ekspresówki. Dobre miejsce na rolki, czy inna aktywność na wyasfaltowanym uboczu. commented 2025-09-09 15:44:16 UTC by Aim311_ ♦129 |
| 168894970 (Comments: 3) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 20) | Sorry Phil, I'd misread the changeset! Apologies for the confusion. commented 2025-09-09 15:42:38 UTC by leocassarani ♦2 |
| 171634744 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171693055 commented 2025-09-09 15:38:16 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171634458 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171692765 commented 2025-09-09 15:33:13 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171568118 (Comments: 2) | randomaper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok commented 2025-09-09 15:22:23 UTC by randomaper ♦1 |
| 156658300 (Comments: 4) | dom74 (Discussed changesets: 12) | slt , je n'ai que 2 photos avec les panneaux rencontrer sur ma rando , je les ai mise sur mon drive tu me dira si c'est ok pour toi : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/17QMvuoMlp79LNBJ7RL_e5juKjacH6AV2?usp=sharing commented 2025-09-09 15:19:35 UTC by dom74 ♦7 |
| 171486621 (Comments: 4) | worldqafix (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sorry, I didn't notice the change was recent. You're right about the outdated data on Mapillary. Just a thought: additional data, even if outdated, could be helpful. While we should always prioritize correctness—for example, t... commented 2025-09-09 15:11:30 UTC by worldqafix ♦9 |
| 170807581 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 64) | According to streetlevel imagery, not all street signs in the area display directional prefixes. Therefore, adding them would be a violation of the "on-the-ground" rule. This doesn't even count the fact that some streets' directio... commented 2025-09-09 15:01:06 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦79 |
| 171652787 (Comments: 1) | HeiligerHein112 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hallo ich habe zu diesem Thema nun eine Diskussion in der Community eingeleitet https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hausnummern-bestehend-aus-einer-zahl-und-einem-buchstaben-richtige-eintragen/135438 Darauf möchte ich hinw... commented 2025-09-09 15:00:56 UTC by wies1 ♦161 |
| 164396936 (Comments: 2) | bob3bob3 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Must have been too much coffee. Will fix a bit later today using maxspeed:type:AU as well. Tnx much. commented 2025-09-09 14:53:29 UTC by bob3bob3 ♦54 |
| 134182557 (Comments: 1) | Massimilianosantini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Massimiliano vedo che nel 2023 hai marcato Via Strada Nuova come access=destination. Non trovo riscontro nelle foto di streetside del 2018. C'è stato un cambiamento in questo intervallo? commented 2025-09-09 14:49:34 UTC by Jacopo ♦37 |
| 162990355 (Comments: 3) | Jordi MF_import (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ho acabo de trobar per casualitat Salutacions! commented 2025-09-09 14:48:52 UTC by Sandal man ♦394 |
| 16390869 (Comments: 1) | lecafou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5085686/history has maxspeed:source = FR:urban that was added in this edit is maxspeed:source intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed <... commented 2025-09-09 14:48:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 163320268 (Comments: 5) | Municipalité de Villeret (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've changed the issues found in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171690695, happy mapping! commented 2025-09-09 14:47:11 UTC by habi ♦1,883 |
| 160886410 (Comments: 1) | Nzau (Discussed changesets: 71) | Hello, il y a 3 autres notes qui sont apparues pour indiquer des bâtiments en construction. Je ne sais pas quelles vues aériennes tu avais utilisé pour tracer les bâtiments, je n'en trouve aucune qui permet de voir tes ... commented 2025-09-09 14:44:32 UTC by K12230LF ♦16 |
| 171661664 (Comments: 1) | DavidPinzonhispa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola DavidPinzonhispa, gracias por colaborar con OSM. Antes de seguir lea: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios Sus comentarios actuales no identifican los cambios que ha realizado, lo que pe... commented 2025-09-09 14:31:14 UTC by jeslop ♦4,244 |
| 171687377 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 872) | the typo has been corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171689740 commented 2025-09-09 14:27:06 UTC by stasiu512 ♦175 |
| 171688961 (Comments: 1) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 38) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13131012386 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-09-09 14:21:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171689262 (Comments: 1) | YuliyaSurta (Discussed changesets: 54) | Wrong action was mentioned. Changed road class. commented 2025-09-09 14:18:41 UTC by YuliyaSurta ♦54 |
| 170888824 (Comments: 2) | Monchinho (Discussed changesets: 40) | Ola, Rodrigo. Si, efectivamente o petróglifo está na pena que se pode apreciar. Un pouco máis ao sur está o lugar de Pena do Oso, topónimo do que colle o nome o petróglifo oficialmente mentres non se estude a... commented 2025-09-09 14:17:38 UTC by Monchinho ♦65 |
| 171689126 (Comments: 1) | B972025 (Discussed changesets: 14) | I mean I noticed there was such a footpath which connected the Rail Corridor and Bukit Merah bus interchange. Just walked past there this evening :) commented 2025-09-09 14:16:09 UTC by B972025 ♦13 |
| 171509759 (Comments: 2) | f4phantom (Discussed changesets: 4) | tamam peki. commented 2025-09-09 14:10:02 UTC by f4phantom ♦3 |
| 166063762 (Comments: 2) | neverdance (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tks for your notice. An unexpected system crash caused these issues. I'll fix it. commented 2025-09-09 14:08:53 UTC by neverdance ♦3 |
| 171596773 (Comments: 2) | UtterClutter (Discussed changesets: 24) | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations commented 2025-09-09 14:05:14 UTC by UtterClutter ♦25 |
| 171684576 (Comments: 3) | zorrigas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Disculpas. Los nombres a los que me refería fueron agregados por otro mapero. No obstante, esos caminos "Fundo Loreto" también parecen ser descriptivos. Mas rato le doy una mirada más profunda a ese sector.<... commented 2025-09-09 13:55:14 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,473 |
| 170085135 (Comments: 3) | ordinatous (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, sorry I didn't see your comment, it was a mistake btw destination and direction. Sorry. commented 2025-09-09 13:52:20 UTC by ordinatous ♦4 |
| 171679640 (Comments: 3) | tux67 (Discussed changesets: 129) | Danke für deine schnelle Antwort! Ja, das "NSG" im Namen sieht man noch ab und zu und dann meist regional gehäuft. Die Variante mit der Unterscheidung zw official_name und name finde ich gut. Wobei ich persönlich wohl (aus Fa... commented 2025-09-09 13:45:12 UTC by Edelsalami ♦111 |
| 171417898 (Comments: 3) | 7beren (Discussed changesets: 13) | Je ziet winkels met source=BAG. Maar je ziet ook bakken winkels die geen source=BAG hebben. Hoe zit dat precies? commented 2025-09-09 13:41:12 UTC by 7beren ♦3 |
| 171687046 (Comments: 1) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 162) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2946790441 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-09-09 13:40:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 170613395 (Comments: 3) | jonnymccullagh (Discussed changesets: 18) | I checked this site again on Friday. The whole block is leveled. commented 2025-09-09 13:24:43 UTC by jonnymccullagh ♦12 |
| 171674376 (Comments: 2) | styreen (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddolphin dolphin? commented 2025-09-09 13:18:28 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171508240 (Comments: 1) | Matteo_Bertuzzi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/36403156. What is the mean of the tag Stile Architettonico = Moderno anni '80? Did you mean https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:building:architecture ? commented 2025-09-09 13:17:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171683930 (Comments: 1) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Yep... prima. commented 2025-09-09 13:11:05 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171678431 (Comments: 6) | nokfi (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hier ook nog even in OSRM https://map.project-osrm.org/?z=18¢er=53.236728%2C6.543190&loc=53.237420%2C6.542959&loc=53.235399%2C6.544322&hl=en&alt=0&srv=2 commented 2025-09-09 13:05:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 166458172 (Comments: 2) | Aloade (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, merci pour le retour, mais ce tronçon est bizarrement fait, il y a plusieurs soucis que j'ai relevé : - en amont (osm.org/node/12296039915) la piste cyclable remplace le trottoir, il n'y a pas d'... commented 2025-09-09 13:03:11 UTC by Aloade ♦7 |
| 171620785 (Comments: 2) | Константин Гам (Discussed changesets: 292) | Thank you, I fix it commented 2025-09-09 13:02:27 UTC by Константин Гам ♦726 |
| 171602723 (Comments: 4) | smeee_again (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das wäre sehr nett, vielen Dank für die Hilfe! commented 2025-09-09 12:51:27 UTC by smeee_again ♦1 |
| 171683428 (Comments: 1) | Magjul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/108119884. What is the mean of the tags crossing:markings=no description=not part of lakeside dr. name=driveway ? Does this path not exist up to the node https://www.o... commented 2025-09-09 12:51:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 67699648 (Comments: 6) | Gianfranco2014 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Tanto meglio. Grazie ! commented 2025-09-09 12:47:50 UTC by voschix ♦185 |
| 168482729 (Comments: 2) | mike moro (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks! Got it, didn't know that. commented 2025-09-09 12:45:54 UTC by mike moro ♦5 |
| 122703439 (Comments: 2) | ig4map (Discussed changesets: 16) | reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171684529 because of huge inaccuracy, as well as this changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122703081 commented 2025-09-09 12:44:13 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦339 |
| 160804409 (Comments: 1) | bgfs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, why do you think, the path 1347387507 needs layer=-1? commented 2025-09-09 12:41:18 UTC by urk ♦12 |
| 171305880 (Comments: 5) | MVG_MLI (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok vielen Dank für die Info. commented 2025-09-09 12:40:55 UTC by MVG_MLI ♦2 |
| 171654713 (Comments: 3) | nokfi (Discussed changesets: 7) | Nokfi... als er geen apart voetpad is ingetekend dan niet het fietspad op slot zetten met foot=use_sidepath. Fietspaden routeren gewoon voor wandelaars. Groet.. eggie commented 2025-09-09 12:38:37 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171602998 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171684301 commented 2025-09-09 12:37:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171683363 (Comments: 2) | Senihtu (Discussed changesets: 41) | Nicht nötig, war eigentlich meine Arbeit, dies zu erledigen. :) commented 2025-09-09 12:37:33 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦211 |
| 170708203 (Comments: 8) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 23) | Habe nun ein Schild gefunden, dass es sich um einen Abstellplatz für nicht genutzte Wohnmobile handelt. War auf dem Einfahrtstor, allerdings hatte ich das noch nie gesehen, da es fast immer offen steht und die Zettel dann nicht ersichtlich sind. commented 2025-09-09 12:28:33 UTC by vikiawv ♦22 |
| 171600855 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171683756 commented 2025-09-09 12:26:51 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 153966255 (Comments: 1) | زايد محمد القحطاني (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102350255/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and... commented 2025-09-09 12:24:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
 | 116321824 (Comments: 1) | Ruru AOR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402321309/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and ... commented 2025-09-09 12:23:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
 | 133910045 (Comments: 1) | DirkZA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30649947/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and m... commented 2025-09-09 12:23:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 155719054 (Comments: 1) | Aurrekoetxea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111650374/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and ... commented 2025-09-09 12:23:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 160755186 (Comments: 1) | Kasane__122 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832491825/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and ... commented 2025-09-09 12:15:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 154880379 (Comments: 1) | 西田艾莉 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12094809559/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used a... commented 2025-09-09 12:14:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 168952117 (Comments: 1) | melo_1 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13001219511/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used a... commented 2025-09-09 12:14:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 138440178 (Comments: 1) | Saradas00 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11002355262/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used a... commented 2025-09-09 12:14:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171677257 (Comments: 1) | throwaway753 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding details here. However, please do not use tags such as "layer=1" on buildings if the purpose is to evade validator warnings. In this edit, as long as in yesterday’s edit, you created a long footway acros... commented 2025-09-09 12:13:24 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,544 |
| 171678799 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 385) | Sorry, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12363334793 hätte nicht hier reingehört... commented 2025-09-09 12:12:05 UTC by habi ♦1,883 |
| 171630353 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 7) | As mentioned before, please only edit the names if you think they are wrong. Don't delete the feature directly. commented 2025-09-09 12:05:47 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,596 |
| 171032805 (Comments: 2) | Kiana_Kaslana (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171682662 commented 2025-09-09 12:04:51 UTC by Kiana_Kaslana ♦13 |
| 171681075 (Comments: 1) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | 👍 commented 2025-09-09 11:55:20 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 155796815 (Comments: 6) | sundew (Discussed changesets: 46) | Zur Orientierung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness/Gallery commented 2025-09-09 11:53:39 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,374 |
| 171600482 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split and wrong restriction limits#OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171681989 commented 2025-09-09 11:50:52 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 162886833 (Comments: 1) | world_explorer1231 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wow, this is a HUGE changeset! (We try to keep them much smaller whenever possible). Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49782685 is called "Wurzenpass" on the Slovene side? commented 2025-09-09 11:44:29 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦177 |
| 171600177 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split and sign removal #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171681492 commented 2025-09-09 11:41:51 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171645716 (Comments: 1) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 30) | ah... sorry. you change it to a woods. Why this particular shape in the middle of forests and woods? regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171645716 commented 2025-09-09 11:35:13 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,473 |
| 171667237 (Comments: 4) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ah right, volgens mij werkt dat niet CoMaps (de app die ik gebruik). Ik kan daar in ieder geval niet het type aanpassen. Dus kan niet van “address” “shop” maken (of wat de correcte term ook is). Ik heb bij nummer acht nu ook e... commented 2025-09-09 11:34:42 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 171645627 (Comments: 1) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello. Is this a mistake? I understand the appearing of little ponds, but this... regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171645627 commented 2025-09-09 11:33:53 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,473 |
| 171599390 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171680906 commented 2025-09-09 11:30:00 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171653971 (Comments: 1) | quadero (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. El puente no es en realidad curvo. Es la deformación de las fotos en terrenos escarpados. Mirar el viaducto del Malleco: aparece entero curvo en las fotos. Fue solucionado por otro mapero. Saludos --- |
| 158378065 (Comments: 2) | HABmaps (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hola AgusQui, vi las imágenes sugeridas disponibles y son mas claras, empecé a usarlas sobre CABA commented 2025-09-09 11:24:58 UTC by HABmaps ♦5 |
| 130756383 (Comments: 1) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 381) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126232715 Er du sikker på, at Luserende løber på denne side af vejen? Ifølge SDFI Screenmap ligger den under jorden på vestsiden af vejen. commented 2025-09-09 11:22:30 UTC by cyclist789 ♦36 |
| 139428871 (Comments: 1) | Ralph Urbach (Discussed changesets: 2) | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11088698576 is not attached to any pipes and takes water directly from moist soil (=groundwater) or is maybe app presenting it a wrong way? maybe source of piped water is groundwater,... commented 2025-09-09 11:14:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 167227204 (Comments: 4) | carolinek22 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Would you mind switching it back from access=private? That would keep the tagging consistent with how “Private Way” is treated in Massachusetts. Thanks! commented 2025-09-09 10:55:28 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦119 |
| 165540081 (Comments: 1) | Julien39 (Discussed changesets: 102) | bonjour, Est-il possible de savoir d'où sort cette géométrie ENS ? L'ENS de ce site est sensiblement plus étendue. https://maps.vaucluse.fr/index.php/view/map?repository=zpens&project=dia#5.168867,43.77... commented 2025-09-09 10:50:53 UTC by JLZIMMERMANN ♦117 |
| 171671465 (Comments: 1) | viktoriia_frolova (Discussed changesets: 1) | road geometry was fixed and turn restrictions were added based on Esri World Imagery (2022) commented 2025-09-09 10:37:26 UTC by viktoriia_frolova ♦1 |
| 171674402 (Comments: 1) | Leo78! (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-09 10:34:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171638624 (Comments: 1) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ankara Tren Garının Celal Bayar Bulvarına bakan kısmında yer alan yapı ATG ye ait diye biliyorum yani Ankara YHT garının o yüzden Ankara Gar ından kaldırdım yanlışım varsa düzeltin lütfen commented 2025-09-09 10:15:13 UTC by dıscover ♦2 |
| 171670581 (Comments: 2) | Max1234-ITA (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ciao, sì, può essere, dalle foto aeree non si capisce sempre bene... e con Ortezzano oggi le cose son complicate! :-) commented 2025-09-09 10:13:56 UTC by Max1234-ITA ♦16 |
| 171559216 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171677207 commented 2025-09-09 10:11:10 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171643187 (Comments: 4) | bicyclett (Discussed changesets: 22) | Im ersten Satz des letzten Kommentars fehlt "fehlt" am Ende ;-) commented 2025-09-09 10:00:59 UTC by tux67 ♦1,961 |
| 168836534 (Comments: 4) | Lockstar (Discussed changesets: 61) | Fixed on changesets 171675905 and 171676614. commented 2025-09-09 09:59:02 UTC by shinjiman ♦22 |
| 171674167 (Comments: 2) | snavee17 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-09-09 09:56:46 UTC by snavee17 ♦1 |
| 171584324 (Comments: 5) | StreetCompleter86 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi Ik heb het al aangepast zodat het routeert voor autoverkeer. Die notes die je kunt plaatsen zijn eigenlijk niet bedoeld voor jezelf als herinnering, maar bestemd voor medemappers die het vervolgens gaan aanpakken of je een tip geven hoe het aa... commented 2025-09-09 09:54:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 162886156 (Comments: 1) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 158) | Mobilitätslinie: Ist der Planfeststellungsbeschluss bereits erfolgt? Oder ist es nur ne grobe Planung? In dem Fall sollte die Linie aus OSM entfernt werden.. commented 2025-09-09 09:49:40 UTC by chris66 ♦400 |
| 171584211 (Comments: 4) | StreetCompleter86 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke... up to you. Ik valideer alleen maar. Mapse eggie commented 2025-09-09 09:48:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171559079 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171676056 commented 2025-09-09 09:45:33 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171583877 (Comments: 2) | StreetCompleter86 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag eggie, ok, genoteerd en bedankt! MVG SC86 commented 2025-09-09 09:40:30 UTC by StreetCompleter86 ♦3 |
| 170001943 (Comments: 3) | veredicta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ja ich habe alles richtiggestellt. Wenn Sie die Änderung nicht sehen genügt es den cache zu leeren oder auf Windows Strg + R zu drücken. Vg Michaeö commented 2025-09-09 09:36:18 UTC by wildmaps ♦56 |
| 171653697 (Comments: 3) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | Zostanie to naprawione, nie zauważyłem po prostu commented 2025-09-09 09:34:25 UTC by Barroszt ♦303 |
| 171633647 (Comments: 3) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 243) | Done.. commented 2025-09-09 09:29:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171631990 (Comments: 5) | frank_v_s (Discussed changesets: 18) | De aparte fietspaden heb ik verwijderd... De drie fietsrouterelaties verlegd naar de Noorderstraat zelf. Fietssuggestiestroken toegevoegd en maxspeed 30. commented 2025-09-09 09:28:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 169169548 (Comments: 2) | kuhni74 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hallo Peter! Nein bin ich nicht, aber ich habe die Quellen für meine Klassifikationen klar benannt, und die sagt u.a., dass das oberste Gratstück zur Kreuzspitze durchaus fordernder und T4 ist (https://www.hikr.org/tour/post194227.html). Wa... commented 2025-09-09 09:27:47 UTC by kuhni74 ♦381 |
| 171593486 (Comments: 4) | 1998alexkane (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hi, ich könnte jetzt mit einem Luftbild kontern, da ist der Radweg so wie erfasst erkennbar. ;-) Die rote Pflasterung war mal der Radweg. Radfahrer sind dort nur noch geduldet, da keinerlei Schilder dort stehen, es ist also kein bicyc... commented 2025-09-09 09:23:45 UTC by berndw ♦616 |
| 171656035 (Comments: 1) | Dušan Kreheľ (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zdravím, pri kreslení budov, ktoré sú hranaté prosím používajte klávesovú skratku na zahranatenie "Q" alebo pravý klik na budovu a následne vybrať možnosť &quo... commented 2025-09-09 09:21:53 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,016 |
| 171284196 (Comments: 2) | lukaswewue (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi @wombatmaper, thanks for the feedback. I added places I was missing in Organic Maps during my vacation. In the online Editor ID, it was possible for me to specify that key. I made the change. commented 2025-09-09 09:12:56 UTC by lukaswewue ♦1 |
| 77927153 (Comments: 2) | Saxonyking (Discussed changesets: 7) | Noch ist keine Ausschilderung vorhanden. Mit Fertigstellung des Ausbaus der Wegeführung wir diese erfolgen. Dies wird aber noch Jahre dauern. commented 2025-09-09 09:11:59 UTC by Saxonyking ♦19 |
| 171580913 (Comments: 1) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ich stimme mit mehreren deiner Änderungen nicht überein: (1) Die Zuwegung zum Verdener Schleppjadgverein & Hotel Niedersachsenhof habe ich zurück auf Service Road geändert. Es gibt keine weitere Wohnbebauung und auch eine e... commented 2025-09-09 09:11:27 UTC by OpenStreetBoy ♦28 |
| 160008269 (Comments: 2) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Det må enten være fra SDFI Screenmap eller fra skiltene rundt omkring Kulsbjerg. Måske er Vårmose Sø midten af Vårmose? Jeg ved det ikke. Du må gerne rette det tilbage. commented 2025-09-09 09:03:35 UTC by cyclist789 ♦36 |
| 171673208 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 385) | Und noch ein paar Pools dazu... commented 2025-09-09 09:00:40 UTC by habi ♦1,883 |
| 156139203 (Comments: 3) | Sebastian Rock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the update, that Google image is from May of 2025, i.e. not available at the time of my edit. commented 2025-09-09 09:00:06 UTC by Sebastian Rock ♦1 |
| 171673047 (Comments: 1) | Ex_libris (Discussed changesets: 3) | Giving it some more thought I am inclined to give it a T2 rating as it involves some parts where hiking shoes come in useful commented 2025-09-09 08:55:26 UTC by Ex_libris ♦2 |
| 171599683 (Comments: 1) | MARCO MIGLIORANZI (Discussed changesets: 1) | ciao Marco, le indicazioni dei percorsi escursionistici vanno inseriti nelle relazione non nelle way, come da linee guida CAI-OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI buona mappatura commented 2025-09-09 08:49:35 UTC by Andrea Del Sarto ♦70 |
| 171637044 (Comments: 2) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi! Thanks for the clarification. I'll revert my edit. Best regards, Maksim. commented 2025-09-09 08:41:46 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦22 |
| 166952896 (Comments: 1) | STV87 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hej STV87. Jeg kan se at du i dette ændringssæt bruger "parking_space=normal" på samme linjestreng som amenity=parking. Dette er en uklar måde at tagge på. Man kan komme i tvivl om hvorvidt det er en par... commented 2025-09-09 08:39:36 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦16 |
| 171667650 (Comments: 4) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Dat zou zomaar kunnen, want de BAG plaatst die nodes willekeurig en medemappers gaan er dan mee schuiven. Ik het de kaaswinkel teruggezet. Hier de BAG import zoals het Kadaster het ziet. Dat klopt vaak niet. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/l... commented 2025-09-09 08:28:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171655580 (Comments: 1) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Dag Karel.. Lijkt me oke als het vrij parkeren is daar. MVG eggie commented 2025-09-09 08:19:40 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171656981 (Comments: 2) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Zo gaat de routering anders.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.538119%2C5.914915%3B52.538883%2C5.920504#map=17/52.535891/5.919002 commented 2025-09-09 08:15:06 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171471984 (Comments: 2) | Britzz (Discussed changesets: 51) | j'avais, a priori, remis tous les tronçons dans la relation mais ne m'étais pas soucié de l'ordre, en effet. Merci pour cette intervention. commented 2025-09-09 08:03:29 UTC by Britzz ♦237 |
| 170718599 (Comments: 1) | YE25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | בבקשה לא לפרסם נקודות פרטיות שלא מעניינות את כל המשתמשים. תודה. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171671207 commented 2025-09-09 08:02:33 UTC by hatul ♦383 |
| 171607036 (Comments: 8) | MDD R'dam (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb de school verwijderd en het adres voorlopig intact gelaten. Het Rotterdam Designcollege zou volgens de website op de Beukelsdijk 145 zitten. Wellicht een nevenlocatie. https://www.rotterdamdesigncollege.nl/contact Mavo Del... commented 2025-09-09 07:56:25 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 146458080 (Comments: 4) | diwesser (Discussed changesets: 3) | and yes, it is a a full scale https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=ATYL that will be used few times at most but at least will be detectable as some kind of shop (or is it maybe company office rather than shop where you can w... commented 2025-09-09 07:53:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171605613 (Comments: 1) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi, warum hast du den "Klein Hutberger Weg" (way 6279792) von residential auf unclassified geändert. durch die beidseitige Bebauung ist es klar eine Anwohnerstraße. commented 2025-09-09 07:44:48 UTC by OpenStreetBoy ♦28 |
| 168020364 (Comments: 1) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hallo BB-Plan, der Heideweg ist eine Zufahrtsstraße (service) und keine Wohnstraße (residential). Daher habe ich das wieder in highway=service zurück geändert. Viele Grüße Roger Wilco commented 2025-09-09 07:41:49 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦751 |
| 171665342 (Comments: 1) | CandyK NK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think you made this amendment at the wrong place, so I've reverted it. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-09-09 07:37:57 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
| 171668713 (Comments: 1) | TouringTest (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks! I have not edited it as I lack any local knowledge at all of that area commented 2025-09-09 07:24:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171657142 (Comments: 3) | OneWheelMapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Smart, så behøver man ikke gætte hvor fundamentet ligger 😁, tak commented 2025-09-09 07:23:39 UTC by OneWheelMapper ♦5 |
| 171669340 (Comments: 1) | Alliegaytor (Discussed changesets: 3) | comment didn't go through: fix driveway from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171667028; restore dragged node source: bing commented 2025-09-09 07:20:37 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦46 |
| 171524980 (Comments: 1) | hertipau (Discussed changesets: 4) | gelöschten Stolperstein sicherheitshalber wieder hergestellt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1774835180/history commented 2025-09-09 07:11:11 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,324 |
| 170103528 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 58) | Si, perdón. Non creei unha nota de OSM, se non, unha nota de vídeo con OsmAnd. Ao ver no histórico que o nome viña de lonxe, pero non atopar ningunha evidencia (street views antigos), quiteino deixando a razón no ch... commented 2025-09-09 06:58:47 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦185 |
| 80435826 (Comments: 1) | pl65 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4953815 ? commented 2025-09-09 06:50:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171643581 (Comments: 5) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Wanneer je na aanpassing de node selecteert kun je zien welke key's je heb toegevoegd. Ik zelf kijk met een analysetool achavi. Mijn aanpassingen.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171667710 mapse commented 2025-09-09 06:45:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171640899 (Comments: 1) | Asiamah_Oppong_Gideon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Gideon, tagging a building with building=yes is enough. Don't add name=Building because the name tag is reserved for actual names (e.g. Jubilee House, Aseda House). Best, Sam commented 2025-09-09 06:43:41 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦97 |
| 171643339 (Comments: 3) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Top.. 👍 commented 2025-09-09 06:40:53 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171643968 (Comments: 2) | Moiety (Discussed changesets: 23) | Dankjewel! commented 2025-09-09 06:36:55 UTC by Moiety ♦17 |
| 171666655 (Comments: 1) | Oler4 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin aus Wildeshausen und willkommen bei OSM! Du hast hier einen Hydranten als Knoten einer Straße (highway=*) erfasst. Ich habe die bisher - falls überhaupt - nur als alleinstehende Knoten möglichst genau an der Stelle erfasst, wo... commented 2025-09-09 06:33:19 UTC by GerdP ♦2,767 |
| 171667338 (Comments: 1) | charliemikeprotectionaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-09-09 06:30:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
| 171640783 (Comments: 1) | F y (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello F y, tagging a building with building=yes is enough. Don't add name=Building because the name tag is reserved for actual names (e.g. Jubilee House, Aseda House). Best, Sam commented 2025-09-09 06:30:15 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦97 |
| 145150579 (Comments: 1) | sewesew (Discussed changesets: 13) | takie zmiany powinno się na forum zaproponować przed ich wykonaniem na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 commented 2025-09-09 06:29:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171667324 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 526) | patrz też https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zamkniete-przejscia-graniczne-z-bialorusia-kategorie-drog-do-granicy/102551/88 i https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zamkniete-przejscia-graniczne-z-bialorusia-kategorie-drog-do-granicy/102551 commented 2025-09-09 06:29:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 165061936 (Comments: 1) | HoepSv (Discussed changesets: 1) | is it really fire hydrant with water coming directly from ground, rather than piped? Or is it some mistake? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12761921763/history commented 2025-09-09 06:17:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 171659931 (Comments: 1) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 31) | Merci <3 commented 2025-09-09 06:13:41 UTC by tyr_asd ♦443 |
| 166726108 (Comments: 2) | Mountain_Hiker (Discussed changesets: 1) | To elaborate, ford=yes should be treated like bridge=yes or tunnel=yes. The entirety of a highway that features a bridge should not be tagged with bridge=yes, but rather the way should be broken into sections and only the section involving th... commented 2025-09-09 06:10:56 UTC by ericrw_ ♦4 |
| 171643375 (Comments: 1) | Mohammad Amirabdollahi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mohammad Amirabdollahi, You have edited this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337654839 and boundary relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6557987 which creates overlapping/intersecting issues. Could you please check ... commented 2025-09-09 06:08:06 UTC by soliMM ♦38 |
| 158443408 (Comments: 3) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 231) | Hi, I forgot to say that yes I agree the path line looks very strange. It's also joined to many other land features which is poor mapping. commented 2025-09-09 06:01:20 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,915 |
| 171630072 (Comments: 2) | Henrik | Lünecom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Hufkratzer, viele Dank für die Hinweise, ich habe es entsprechend angepasst commented 2025-09-09 05:53:21 UTC by Henrik | Lünecom ♦1 |
| 171664315 (Comments: 1) | CameraEye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi CameraEye, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field.... commented 2025-09-09 05:52:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,627 |
 | 169238612 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 169238401 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 169238775 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 169238842 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 169239148 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 169238164 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 169237519 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 169237888 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 169237690 (Comments: 1) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in multiple languages https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171666105 commented 2025-09-09 05:49:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171658747 (Comments: 1) | leroyNL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Dit soort persoonlijke informatie wordt niet opgenomen in OSM en zal worden verwijderd. MVG, Eggie ... commented 2025-09-09 05:48:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171657012 (Comments: 1) | GMeta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-09 05:46:45 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171400020 (Comments: 2) | Ludivette (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Hugo, Ces 'chemins' ne sont pas à référencer du tout car ils n'existent pas (cf carte IGN / géoportail). commented 2025-09-09 05:33:58 UTC by Ludivette ♦1 |
| 171644850 (Comments: 1) | hatochan (Discussed changesets: 19) | こんにちは。 建物等を新しい状況に更新した点については、特段の問題は見当たりませんが 以下の2点で不可解または好ましくない編集が見られます。 不可解：解体済みとタ... commented 2025-09-09 05:20:15 UTC by 大山かなめ ♦60 |
| 170191754 (Comments: 1) | ArthurDelannoy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Pourquoi conserver le acccess=permit sur le giratoire et la bretelle d'accès ? commented 2025-09-09 05:16:23 UTC by mat ♦53 |
| 171519650 (Comments: 5) | Felis Pimeja (Discussed changesets: 66) | Исправил междупутье и чуть подвинул платформу. commented 2025-09-09 03:53:16 UTC by Alexey Lukin ♦31 |
| 171387923 (Comments: 3) | Kiana_Kaslana (Discussed changesets: 7) | Besides, its also running on 2 guiderails, monorail where? commented 2025-09-09 02:57:35 UTC by Kiana_Kaslana ♦13 |
| 170420791 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_Dang (Discussed changesets: 7) | Đường vừa được điều chỉnh lý trình, nhập vào đường Đặng Đại Độ. Bạn vui lòng cập nhật thông tin: https://thanhnien.vn/tphcm-dat-ten-moi-cho-60-tuyen-duong-185250724100127187.htm commented 2025-09-09 02:53:09 UTC by Tommybara ♦94 |
| 127056609 (Comments: 1) | Anton Khorev (Discussed changesets: 37) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10077762669 🤔 commented 2025-09-09 02:34:28 UTC by mini-me ♦265 |
| 171661782 (Comments: 1) | Patrickov (Discussed changesets: 29) | Sorry iD forced me to tag way 206804333 to get my edits uploaded. commented 2025-09-09 02:29:12 UTC by Patrickov ♦106 |
 | 171521882 (Comments: 7) | Michel Castano (Discussed changesets: 10) | Update: Data working group from OSM wrote this: I have reverted the edits now. It can take a few minutes for the map to update. Hopefully everything should be reverted now. Thanks! commented 2025-09-09 02:01:55 UTC by Michel Castano ♦2 |
| 171508786 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.nps.gov/pore/planyourvisit/tomales-bay-boat-in-camping.htm > There are no designated campsites along Tomales Bay. Instead, there are a number of beaches on which one may camp, if one has a boat-in camping permit. Deleted... commented 2025-09-09 01:33:24 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171506971 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171660439 I moved the campground to a different location based on the pictures on the NPS website. I believe that the location it was originally is private cabins not operated by the NPS commented 2025-09-09 01:03:05 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171506627 (Comments: 1) | marnib (Discussed changesets: 1) | I added a more specific website link. Thanks for your contribution commented 2025-09-09 00:46:57 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171641704 (Comments: 1) | Kalepom (Discussed changesets: 66) | Bonjour, Etes-vous sûr que le restaurant La Récré a réouvert ? Il est fermé définitivement aux dernières nouvelles depuis au moins 1 an. De plus, pour le shop=vacant rajouté, le point e... commented 2025-09-09 00:40:42 UTC by jcnl44 ♦16 |
| 169686124 (Comments: 1) | Corey Fonseca (Discussed changesets: 3) | I checked out this path. In fact, it is for rainwater runoff drainage. Not a path. Also, it's on private land, owned by Crossharbor Capital Partners LLC and as such not intended as a path. commented 2025-09-09 00:39:44 UTC by aduxas ♦36 |
| 171444849 (Comments: 2) | Elwell (Discussed changesets: 3) | If we can't use the positions directly, i should have enough photos of the river to roughly determine coordinates and will upload to a flickr album when home next week. Have already visually verified the light sequence of the piles upriver from ... commented 2025-09-09 00:17:34 UTC by Elwell ♦2 |
| 171636695 (Comments: 1) | H Casey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Old roads rarely are straight up deleted unless they were added incorrectly, or completely razed. Instead we often do a prefix code to indicate they exist, but were states of disrepair. This is sometimes useful for hikers and for people to no... commented 2025-09-09 00:03:44 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦81 |
| 64029116 (Comments: 1) | CorazonDelator (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hola. Podes revisar estos caminos? Por ejemplo, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174585361 la imagen aerera no muestra nada, a lo mucho track, pero te diria que si fuera por la imagen aerea lo borraria... commented 2025-09-08 23:29:57 UTC by muralito ♦2,057 |
| 171513664 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | I merged this trailhead with the other POI for the same trailhead nearby --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171513664 commented 2025-09-08 23:25:59 UTC by jake-low ♦38 |
| 171513674 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | I fixed a typo in this trailhead's name ("Alum Cave Trailhead Trailhead") --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171513674 commented 2025-09-08 23:25:36 UTC by jake-low ♦38 |
| 171514109 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | FYI, it looks like this changeset accidentally included a couple of redundant trailhead nodes. I've edited them again to fix this. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514109<... commented 2025-09-08 23:11:02 UTC by jake-low ♦38 |
| 171514231 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | FYI, I've removed this trailhead since it doesn't meet OSM's definition (a place where someone could start a hike or journey), since it's deep in the wilderness at the USFS/NPS boundary. This was an issue with the source dataset, ... commented 2025-09-08 23:05:13 UTC by jake-low ♦38 |
| 89848071 (Comments: 3) | ottwiz (Discussed changesets: 285) | Jelenleg ez a sport=football_tennis a legnépszerűbb címke erre, de használják a sport=futnet-et is páran. Egyik sincs ledokumentálva. > While the term football tennis is still commonly used, the wo... commented 2025-09-08 23:03:27 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 171655218 (Comments: 1) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 40) | no non esiste, non so neanche come faccia a essercene uno lì commented 2025-09-08 22:30:18 UTC by Cybermanx ♦4 |
| 171446985 (Comments: 3) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 40) | Ah, ok. Non era una critica. Così da bing è difficile da vedere cos'è... Grazie per il tuo contributo. Un saluto commented 2025-09-08 22:21:01 UTC by wildmaps ♦56 |
| 155767674 (Comments: 3) | ddm-dolomitico (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bene, grazie mille! commented 2025-09-08 22:17:04 UTC by wildmaps ♦56 |
| 171594913 (Comments: 2) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 381) | Not sure what happened, but I have fixed it. commented 2025-09-08 22:13:14 UTC by Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦603 |
| 171653630 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-08 22:03:50 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 171653639 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 415) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-09-08 22:03:01 UTC by bartgron ♦260 |
| 146222331 (Comments: 1) | Optic_Fiber (Discussed changesets: 6) | ciao caro! non si mappa la colonnina con owner=, risolvo io non ti preouccpare ! commented 2025-09-08 21:54:30 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦76 |
| 161027877 (Comments: 2) | JohnnyWonder (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo David. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Ich habe versucht meine offensichtlichen Fehler zu korrigieren. Schau bitte gerne noch einmal drüber ob das nun so richtig ist. Grüße! commented 2025-09-08 21:51:51 UTC by JohnnyWonder ♦2 |
| 90452801 (Comments: 1) | Michel Sandon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, vous avez ajouté beaucoup aires de repos (highway=rest_area) sur des ... sentiers ! C'est plutôt le genre d'installation que l'on trouve sur une autoroute. Qu'avez-vous réellement voulu cartographier ?... commented 2025-09-08 21:51:12 UTC by r2d ♦35 |
| 171562119 (Comments: 2) | KindredCoda (Discussed changesets: 18) | Yes, I will rectify this issue. -Coda commented 2025-09-08 21:34:04 UTC by KindredCoda ♦9 |
| 171655645 (Comments: 2) | camerawoman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, I will use the expanded comment going forward! commented 2025-09-08 21:18:27 UTC by camerawoman ♦1 |
| 170927379 (Comments: 2) | vinc17 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Désolé. Je pense que c'est alors un gros bug de StreetComplete, qui était censé changer uniquement lane et lane_markings. À moins que ce soit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171054735 qui ai... commented 2025-09-08 21:04:51 UTC by vinc17 ♦1 |
| 171655597 (Comments: 1) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 47) | Deleted duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13000000101 commented 2025-09-08 20:42:43 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦109 |
| 132398293 (Comments: 7) | Brummelwuff (Discussed changesets: 19) | Anfrage per Mail an Stadt Münster zur Klärung raus - abwarten commented 2025-09-08 20:40:32 UTC by limes11 ♦927 |
| 167066910 (Comments: 2) | Freek_ (Discussed changesets: 24) | The last time I was there it was stil under construction. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2363966533998089 I will have a look around next weekend. commented 2025-09-08 20:33:32 UTC by Freek_ ♦18 |
| 171649655 (Comments: 2) | Kabooshki (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, they have a solar panel with a branch-shaped antenna on top of a pole. They have been on campus for quite a few years at this point. commented 2025-09-08 20:32:56 UTC by Kabooshki ♦3 |
| 171306971 (Comments: 6) | pawka007 (Discussed changesets: 36) | W/g wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrack drogi obsługujące nie tylko pola na najniższym poziomie najlepiej mapować jako service. Co do dróg lokalnych... kilka tyg. pewien edytor namieszał z tłumaczeniem tag&oac... commented 2025-09-08 20:27:35 UTC by Aim311_ ♦129 |
| 171310903 (Comments: 2) | Руслан234323 (Discussed changesets: 9) | это прямо запрещено правилами осм commented 2025-09-08 20:17:10 UTC by skadi ♦10 |
| 171031059 (Comments: 1) | Руслан234323 (Discussed changesets: 9) | нельзя верить сторонним картам, 2гис те еще блбесы. проверяем ножками, по открытым снимкам или не трогаем commented 2025-09-08 20:15:13 UTC by skadi ♦10 |
| 171505995 (Comments: 1) | RentManagerWeb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mall parcel is inclusive of multiple addresses; if this address is the property management office, then the property management office should be tagged. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2025-09-08 20:03:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171654332 (Comments: 1) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 159) | https://www.facebook.com/PowiatPruszkowski/posts/pfbid0Tbtm8ayqccGCiTdikmW7cibza2jBgZkJ5ujZ6CBR6KeZTEhzx4NiPnicrL2oDSwtl commented 2025-09-08 20:01:21 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,133 |
| 171641000 (Comments: 1) | Meredith McLaughlin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3342210427 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-09-08 20:00:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 153951566 (Comments: 1) | GustavoE (Discussed changesets: 33) | Cual es la fuente del nombre Cerro Potrerillos? Saludos commented 2025-09-08 19:55:32 UTC by damandak ♦1 |
| 171647359 (Comments: 2) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 171) | Ist korrigiert. commented 2025-09-08 19:46:14 UTC by wermak ♦119 |
| 171653617 (Comments: 1) | Austin Lamb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/2531462949 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position commented 2025-09-08 19:45:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171651167 (Comments: 1) | castellum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode MVG, Eggie Namens de O... commented 2025-09-08 19:40:53 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 164316571 (Comments: 3) | granpasso811 (Discussed changesets: 15) | interessante il sito, grazie commented 2025-09-08 19:40:49 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦76 |
| 171653248 (Comments: 1) | kekelbdu69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai corrigé la route que t'as déplacé sans faire exprès ;) commented 2025-09-08 19:36:45 UTC by HugoC01 ♦42 |
| 171557972 (Comments: 3) | dluppus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ganz einfach: name=* weglassen, wenn es keinen echten Namen gibt. commented 2025-09-08 19:34:01 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦211 |
| 171605370 (Comments: 1) | Arkadiy Flitman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lütfen iD Editörün vermiş olduğu uyarıları dikkate alın. Yolu yanlışlıkla taşımışsınız. Düzelttim: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171653268 commented 2025-09-08 19:31:24 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 171605393 (Comments: 1) | Colosseum Fan (Discussed changesets: 3) | "| BAİBÜ" kısmını eklemenize gerek yok. Lütfen eklemeyin. Düzenledim: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171653134 commented 2025-09-08 19:29:01 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦160 |
| 162505544 (Comments: 5) | mhu283 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry, hatte ich übersehen, das ist natürlich immer die beste Quelle. Schau soxh noch mal auf das Tagging der Masten, da hat ein anderer User die teilweise mehrfach getaggten communication:(operator name)=yes zu communication:operator=(oper... commented 2025-09-08 19:20:18 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦72 |
| 171651697 (Comments: 1) | Foxiak (Discussed changesets: 63) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-09-08 19:01:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 169208207 (Comments: 5) | الجزائر المحروسة بالله (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fizzie-DWG user edits have not yet been reverted commented 2025-09-08 18:56:08 UTC by ⵟⴰⴳⵔⴰⵡⵍⴰ ♦12 |
| 169241360 (Comments: 5) | المنتصر (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fizzie-DWG user edits have not yet been reverted commented 2025-09-08 18:53:28 UTC by ⵟⴰⴳⵔⴰⵡⵍⴰ ♦12 |
| 171650703 (Comments: 1) | Konrad95 (Discussed changesets: 2) | * jako źródło powinno być: https://kozienice.kiedyprzyjedzie.pl , https://kozienice.pl/metrobus.html commented 2025-09-08 18:51:00 UTC by Konrad95 ♦7 |
| 171650006 (Comments: 1) | Blue_on_the_time (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. Please describe what you are doing in the changeset comment field. "i" is not a sufficient enough description. commented 2025-09-08 18:47:40 UTC by zabop ♦16 |
| 171566199 (Comments: 7) | ChrisWray (Discussed changesets: 1) | I believe you should be good now. I also went and fixed the house outlines. Feel free to work on the rest. The City of Pasco has a good database of house numbers. https://maps-cityofpasco.hub.arcgis.com/apps/389edcfba6324ad48c147aa1d25c6878/explore commented 2025-09-08 18:43:22 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 151684284 (Comments: 4) | wermworm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Compreendo o ponto. Eu sei que existe ali o ringue, apenas coloquei o nome que aparece no Google Maps. Mas percebo o problema! commented 2025-09-08 18:37:22 UTC by wermworm ♦1 |
| 42087707 (Comments: 6) | pawka007 (Discussed changesets: 36) | A to już różnie, szczególne na podlasiu. Tu to dawno było nie pamietam. Z zasady zmieniam jak znam lokalne obciążenie drogi i cel. Nie ważne czy leśna. Waga jest zawsze wg wytycznych wiki commented 2025-09-08 18:30:01 UTC by pawka007 ♦8 |
| 167416372 (Comments: 6) | mobileGEO (Discussed changesets: 8) | ist erledit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171650176 commented 2025-09-08 18:16:09 UTC by fdemmer ♦11 |
| 141849218 (Comments: 1) | Alexandre Fontaine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Alexandre, Sur cette voie verte tu as passé la valeur de la clé bicycle de designated à yes. C'est une erreur a priori et je voudrais t'expliquer pourquoi. bicycle=yes dit effectivement que les cyclistes o... commented 2025-09-08 18:15:08 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,153 |
| 171642796 (Comments: 1) | NEConstruction (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I checked their website and it still says that the restaurant is open. Is there a reason for deleting it? commented 2025-09-08 18:14:51 UTC by Mashin ♦571 |
| 170621003 (Comments: 2) | freemapsman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dzięki bardzo. Przyjęte do wiadomości :) commented 2025-09-08 18:12:38 UTC by freemapsman ♦1 |
| 171649649 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 277) | guset_house should read as guest_house! commented 2025-09-08 18:09:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,804 |
| 42718312 (Comments: 2) | agab29 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, effectivement; sans-doute un clic en trop qui m'a échappé. Je l'ai supprimé. Merci pour l'info. commented 2025-09-08 18:05:12 UTC by agab29 ♦2 |
| 165928332 (Comments: 1) | Mamutinka (Discussed changesets: 89) | Oj chyba coś poszło nie tak. Edycje początkującego do wycofania? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384284170 commented 2025-09-08 18:03:11 UTC by Aim311_ ♦129 |
| 171633689 (Comments: 1) | vp21 (Discussed changesets: 31) | w końcu ktoś dokończył moją próbę połączenia Gorzowa z Drezdenkiem i w końcu nie ma takiej wielkiej białej plamy, dzięki! commented 2025-09-08 18:03:02 UTC by gncrK ♦3 |
| 171641672 (Comments: 1) | Zinoex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-08 17:58:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 151393734 (Comments: 2) | Reibert (Discussed changesets: 3) | Привіт, так, розлита. commented 2025-09-08 17:56:21 UTC by Reibert ♦3 |
| 165537550 (Comments: 1) | Kaeell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Kaeel, Cette voie (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288036983) et bien piétonne et la piste était déjà décrite ici (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288036995) et se poursuit en bande cyclable &agra... commented 2025-09-08 17:47:23 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,153 |
| 171454947 (Comments: 3) | Toni Serra (Discussed changesets: 87) | La conclusión es clara: la forma de nombrar es la misma para todo tipo de ruta, sea de carretera o de senderismo. En la etiqueta "name" no es correcto poner la referencia junto al nombre. La etiqueta "name" es para el nomb... commented 2025-09-08 17:44:58 UTC by MarinoBM ♦103 |
| 171619454 (Comments: 2) | 2giraffe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello silversurfer, I have absolutly no idea how this has happened-i just moved the bus station. Hope this wont happen again. Thank you for correcting it. Kind regards, 2giraffe commented 2025-09-08 17:32:18 UTC by 2giraffe ♦1 |
| 171603869 (Comments: 2) | mrkusypl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej, szczerze mówiąc dopiero teraz się dowiaduje od ciebie, że przenieśli szkołę do Jagatowa. Nie mam żadnych informacji co może teraz być w starym budynku, a na social mediach szkoły nic nie ma. commented 2025-09-08 17:25:55 UTC by mrkusypl ♦1 |
| 162860553 (Comments: 2) | spughetti (Discussed changesets: 64) | Hey eggie, Interessant, bedankt! commented 2025-09-08 17:20:23 UTC by spughetti ♦113 |
| 171608524 (Comments: 3) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks! Nice work improving all these features! commented 2025-09-08 17:14:47 UTC by MassCartog ♦152 |
| 171568166 (Comments: 6) | JanisLo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Jā, daudzus gadus atpakaļ nēmos ar vektora datu importiem lielu uz mazu pilsētu ēkām. Lielākai laikam bija Liepāja. rusjanis kontu dzēsu, bet pēc tam pardomāju un bija par vēlu. Kas attiecas par ceļiem arī tur man ir kļūdas, jo cen... commented 2025-09-08 17:12:30 UTC by JanisLo ♦2 |
| 171532303 (Comments: 2) | dan980 (Discussed changesets: 10) | I guess I edited the tag name instead of the value. Usually JOSM gives me warnings about these errors, but this time I must have missed it. I removed the tag, thank you commented 2025-09-08 17:06:17 UTC by dan980 ♦27 |
| 171644053 (Comments: 5) | Cyrille37 (Discussed changesets: 20) | J'avais résisté à ce type de modif depuis des mois, et je n'ai pas tenu aujourd'hui :-) J'essaye de m'en souvenir pour la suite. Bien à toi. commented 2025-09-08 17:03:06 UTC by Cyrille37 ♦49 |
| 158639691 (Comments: 5) | asdfgh1234 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dzięki za wyjaśnienie. commented 2025-09-08 16:59:34 UTC by Rogoyski ♦227 |
| 171469538 (Comments: 4) | Walter542018 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Roger, ich habe bei den Eigentümern nachgefragt: Reiten Die Reitwanderwege sind falsch eingetragen. Es gibt keine Erlaubnis der Eigentümer auf Ihrem Hofgelände zu reiten oder durchzureiten. Feldweg Der Feld... commented 2025-09-08 16:56:52 UTC by Walter542018 ♦3 |
| 171586141 (Comments: 3) | Hochwanner (Discussed changesets: 4) | There is no hiking route whatsoever. The trail, barely visible, ends at the fence of the Alm meadow. The meadow itself is of course passable - which warrants mapping as a meadow, not as a trail. commented 2025-09-08 16:47:05 UTC by Hochwanner ♦4 |
| 170966279 (Comments: 1) | joujijade (Discussed changesets: 2) | Doublon avec celle du square Ferdinand Bruno ? commented 2025-09-08 16:44:55 UTC by VitalieS ♦137 |
| 171514641 (Comments: 2) | elvee@AT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! I should have flagged that for human review because I was on the fence. They have it on their website despite not being accessible by road, which seemed odd! https://www.nps.gov/places/000/bridger-lake-trailhead-6k4.htm commented 2025-09-08 16:44:49 UTC by elvee@AT ♦1 |
| 171629045 (Comments: 2) | jd_gis (Discussed changesets: 1) | 你能解释为何要将嘉科纳基地改成收费亭？这边应当仍以军用机场运作 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171629045 commented 2025-09-08 16:43:02 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,480 |
| 171489376 (Comments: 1) | Cleantech Innovation Park GmbH (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427277530 kann das highway=living_street nicht passen. Zum einen ist das auf Unternehmensgeländen eher selten, zum anderen passt die Höchstgeschwindigkeit dann nicht - bei living_street gilt... commented 2025-09-08 16:40:03 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 162783140 (Comments: 1) | RemiParmentelat (Discussed changesets: 5) | S'il vous plaît, ne collez pas les ruisseaux aux frontières. Même si théoriquement le ruisseau est la frontière, en pratique il bouge mais pas la frontière, et quand les deux éléments sont co... commented 2025-09-08 16:39:28 UTC by LouisXIV ♦33 |
| 171515660 (Comments: 4) | dandreis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear demon_box, I apologize for the harsh response. Thank you for your support. commented 2025-09-08 16:38:09 UTC by dandreis ♦1 |
| 171635942 (Comments: 3) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 116) | Hier sieht man auch das Quelldatum, das ist vom 2024: https://map.geo.bs.ch/?lang=en&baselayer_ref=Grundkarte%20farbig&tree_groups=Luftbilder%2COrthofotos%2CSatellitenbilder&tree_enable_SI_Swissimage2024=true&map_x=2612737&map_... commented 2025-09-08 16:34:36 UTC by Piagno ♦97 |
| 171608274 (Comments: 2) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have re installed the building commented 2025-09-08 16:29:58 UTC by Goappr Studios ♦5 |
| 171629402 (Comments: 1) | Cleantech Innovation Park GmbH (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, das emergency=fire_water_pond ist immer nur ein Zusatztag. Damit es erst einmal ein Teich wird, muss noch natural=water water=pond ergänzt werden. Das area=yes muss wieder raus. Viele Grüße commented 2025-09-08 16:29:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 171608377 (Comments: 2) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have re installed the building commented 2025-09-08 16:26:26 UTC by Goappr Studios ♦5 |
| 171629081 (Comments: 1) | Cleantech Innovation Park GmbH (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, für eine Sprinklerzentrale gibt es meines Wissens noch keine Tags. Das building=service dürfte entsprechend erst einmal reichen Was wieder raus muss: emergency=fire_water_pond (das ist kein Löschteich) und der name (Be... commented 2025-09-08 16:24:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 171608510 (Comments: 2) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have re installed the building commented 2025-09-08 16:23:46 UTC by Goappr Studios ♦5 |
| 171608476 (Comments: 2) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have re installed the 2 building commented 2025-09-08 16:19:39 UTC by Goappr Studios ♦5 |
| 171643039 (Comments: 1) | FAKKIUZ (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ciao, non è necessario usare come nome "Stazione di ricarica e-bike", dato che queste informazioni vengono date automaticamente dai tag inseriti. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2025-09-08 16:17:21 UTC by Mannivu ♦241 |
| 171628522 (Comments: 1) | Cleantech Innovation Park GmbH (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen: Geometrie: Um rechtwinklige Gebäude auch in OSM rechtwinklig zu bekommen, das Gebäude markieren und „Q“ drücken &... commented 2025-09-08 16:09:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦885 |
| 171601224 (Comments: 5) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 155) | o nie, kolorek na carto się nie zmienia xD @Filetinteger, sporo wiesz jak na mapującego od 5 kwietnia xD commented 2025-09-08 16:02:23 UTC by Yog Sot ♦286 |
| 171641728 (Comments: 1) | ACC5840 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think this should be a cafe actually. Oops. Not sure how to change that... commented 2025-09-08 15:54:33 UTC by ACC5840 ♦1 |
| 171636790 (Comments: 1) | cranik (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-09-08 15:52:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171636621 (Comments: 2) | Jaszczur90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-09-08 15:52:21 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171588839 (Comments: 2) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 162) | A czy w Polsce jest to Schnellstrasse? Czy będzie docelowo częścią jednej spójnej sieci, która zawsze łączy się z drogą o równej lub wyższej kategorii? No nie. commented 2025-09-08 15:35:34 UTC by pavvv ♦550 |
| 171636868 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 147) | Reverting because of a malfunction on revert #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642349 commented 2025-09-08 15:34:54 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171642023 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 147) | Reverting because of a malfunction on the revert #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642130 commented 2025-09-08 15:30:24 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171558245 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642023 commented 2025-09-08 15:28:29 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171641764 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 147) | Reverting because of a malfunction on the revert #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171641942 commented 2025-09-08 15:26:56 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171582879 (Comments: 2) | Philet2137 (Discussed changesets: 15) | tak wiem zażarto=wałem. POzatym to jest trunk. Prosze zobaczyć dyskusję na śląsku z Payvem commented 2025-09-08 15:24:54 UTC by Philet2137 ♦10 |
| 168986987 (Comments: 2) | burrscurr (Discussed changesets: 28) | Danke für den Hinweis! (korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171641737) commented 2025-09-08 15:22:57 UTC by burrscurr ♦84 |
| 171630261 (Comments: 3) | Brandweer_Erik (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bedankt voor de tip, ik ben nog beginnend met OSM bewerken. Ik ga er mee aan de slag. commented 2025-09-08 15:14:48 UTC by Brandweer_Erik ♦2 |
| 171558162 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171641287 commented 2025-09-08 15:13:45 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171581625 (Comments: 2) | Philet2137 (Discussed changesets: 15) | dobra nie wiedzialem jak to nazwać ALE TO JEST QRVA TRUNK. czego nie rozumiesz. Każda bezkolizyjna 2 pasmówka nie będąca autostradą TO TRUNK. commented 2025-09-08 15:11:39 UTC by Philet2137 ♦10 |
| 171634969 (Comments: 1) | listenheardiagnostics (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Welcome to OSM. If the building still exists on the ground (has not been demolished) then you should just remove the tags and keep the building outline. Could you go back through your changes and correct this? replace or restore building... commented 2025-09-08 15:06:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦152 |
| 171554915 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171640651 commented 2025-09-08 15:01:51 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171603148 (Comments: 4) | Michel Castano (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thank you very much for letting me know about this issue. I truly appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I created a small Python script that was intended only to update the speed limits on ways that were missing this information. However... commented 2025-09-08 14:59:01 UTC by Michel Castano ♦2 |
| 171576658 (Comments: 2) | Philet2137 (Discussed changesets: 15) | dobra zachgodnia czesc odpuszcze, ale od węzła z A1 jest to bezkolizyjna 2 pasmówka, IDEALNA pod kateogrie trunk xddd commented 2025-09-08 14:58:57 UTC by Philet2137 ♦10 |
| 171640376 (Comments: 1) | IrynaStaradub (Discussed changesets: 18) | Correct hashtag is #mapbox_missing_roads commented 2025-09-08 14:58:51 UTC by IrynaStaradub ♦18 |
| 171636593 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 376) | thanks for fixing commented 2025-09-08 14:58:17 UTC by Enock4seth ♦563 |
| 171598369 (Comments: 2) | Enock4seth (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi, Ooops! thanks for catching, fixed now. commented 2025-09-08 14:55:55 UTC by Enock4seth ♦563 |
| 167785362 (Comments: 1) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 97) | Salut Simon, J'ai rallongé cette portion car on voit la trace bien chauffer sur Strava : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396245137 Charles commented 2025-09-08 14:55:37 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,153 |
| 171554442 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171640051 commented 2025-09-08 14:52:14 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 170936288 (Comments: 2) | ja+ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ciao nic10, per gli aggiornamenti ho fatto un sopralluogo sul posto e ho utilizzato le immagini aeree per i dettagli dei percorsi. I sentieri più recenti però non sono ancora visibili nelle foto aeree, quindi potrebbero essere imprecisi... commented 2025-09-08 14:50:44 UTC by ja+ ♦4 |
| 171540162 (Comments: 3) | Francoisepro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, please revert the changes. Thanks for your understanding commented 2025-09-08 14:50:33 UTC by wolfy1339 ♦31 |
| 171554274 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171639579 commented 2025-09-08 14:44:17 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171389631 (Comments: 11) | bhartinegi_lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | Situation normal for Lyft... commented 2025-09-08 14:42:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171553927 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171639293 commented 2025-09-08 14:39:34 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171632219 (Comments: 1) | Matt DaKine (Discussed changesets: 16) | Cześć! Co miałeś na myśli poprzed znacznik elevation? Oznacza on raczej poziom nad poziomem morza (jest to odradzany znacznik, w tym celu powinno się używać znacznika ele). Pozdrawiam, Dawid commented 2025-09-08 14:39:26 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦738 |
| 171633539 (Comments: 1) | Matt DaKine (Discussed changesets: 16) | Cześć! Ze względu na to, że projekt OSM jest tworzony przez małą społeczność (zdecydowanie mniejszą niż np. Google Maps), wiele obiektów (POI) wisi na mapie mimo ich zniknięcia w rzeczywistości lata temu. Jak rozumiem, poprzez ... commented 2025-09-08 14:36:53 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦738 |
| 171634362 (Comments: 1) | Matt DaKine (Discussed changesets: 16) | Cześć! Widzę, że dużo danych dodajesz na podstawie wizji i wiedzy lokalnej, co bardzo się ceni :) Pozwala to na dokładniejsze zmapowanie obiektów. Pozwoliłem sobie jednak lekko poprawić oznaczenia. Skasowałem inscription=brak oraz na... commented 2025-09-08 14:33:48 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦738 |
| 171635162 (Comments: 2) | Matt DaKine (Discussed changesets: 16) | "jazdy koniem"... jazdy konno oczywiście :P commented 2025-09-08 14:29:34 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦738 |
| 157553931 (Comments: 1) | Jacksonville (Discussed changesets: 8) | I saw that you have created https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18131866 but it can not be admin_level=7. Can you doublecheck this attribute? commented 2025-09-08 14:29:03 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦211 |
| 171516254 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171638640 commented 2025-09-08 14:27:19 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171516084 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171637751 commented 2025-09-08 14:10:02 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171565150 (Comments: 4) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 40) | reading this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Circular_and_widened_road_features Traffic routed in a circle, with a large, non-traversable centre island. However the circular traffic must yield for at least one, some or each entering ro... commented 2025-09-08 14:08:02 UTC by toponomastica_comune_arenzano ♦13 |
| 171614712 (Comments: 3) | uknown-gryphus (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for pointing that out! It has already been corrected. commented 2025-09-08 14:05:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171515864 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171637478 commented 2025-09-08 14:05:15 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171515741 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636868 commented 2025-09-08 13:54:08 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 170722297 (Comments: 1) | caboulot (Discussed changesets: 5) | Modification FAUSSE ! il s agit d une boutique de Vente de Souvenir et non d un Espace Coiffure ! De plus l'Espace Coiffure n existe plus depuis plusieurs mois !!! commented 2025-09-08 13:54:03 UTC by sceric ♦1 |
| 171515538 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636700 commented 2025-09-08 13:51:00 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171613699 (Comments: 1) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 40) | The poles may still be present even after the old power line cables are cut. commented 2025-09-08 13:50:54 UTC by PengualaHeadphones ♦22 |
| 171634332 (Comments: 1) | aurelius9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba @aurelius9. Arasında fiziksel engel( refüj, bariyer vb.) bulunmayan yollar ayrı çizilmemeli. Tek bir çizgi ile çizilmeli. Uydu görüntülerinde 714. Sokak'ta şeritleri ayıran bu tür herhang... commented 2025-09-08 13:47:21 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦83 |
| 171511291 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636480 commented 2025-09-08 13:47:04 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 165567954 (Comments: 1) | Antoine chatelain (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonjour Antoine, J'ai regardé cette nouvelle piste cyclable (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382145398) et j'ai observé que l'aménagement existait en l'état depuis au moins 2019. Mais il sembl... commented 2025-09-08 13:45:13 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,153 |
| 171623815 (Comments: 1) | taxi301 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-09-08 13:42:41 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171630458 (Comments: 2) | Mamutinka (Discussed changesets: 89) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604112084 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-09-08 13:42:34 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171578905 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/13512595, https://www.osm.org/relation/13514267. What is the mean of UArea = 15.17 UPopulation2025 = 62483 ? commented 2025-09-08 13:29:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171505602 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171635405 commented 2025-09-08 13:28:12 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171634575 (Comments: 2) | Olaf L (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks. ben vrij nieuw met de edits nog, dank voor je hulp! was me niet bewust dat er meerdere edits nodig waren. commented 2025-09-08 13:24:36 UTC by Olaf L ♦1 |
| 169952769 (Comments: 5) | yoann_immergis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Et aussi un petit changement sur la page wiki bicycle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle pour une harmonisation du panneau B52 avec le C115 (car ici aussi le traffic_sign=FR:C115 est bien indiqué à ajouter sur la voie) commented 2025-09-08 13:23:26 UTC by Patchi ♦135 |
| 160426965 (Comments: 1) | W-HEC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, j'essaye de comprendre quelle source tu as utilisé exactement pour ce niveau de détail, ça m'intéresse (si un jours j'en ai besoin) commented 2025-09-08 13:21:38 UTC by Sylv1_Durif ♦15 |
| 171633885 (Comments: 1) | markokara (Discussed changesets: 2) | Havuz eklerken konsolosluğun etiketlerini de muhtemelen yanlışlıkla silmişsiniz. Hatalı değişikliklerinizi düzelttim. Bilginize. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171634776 commented 2025-09-08 13:17:45 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦83 |
| 171615248 (Comments: 1) | tomi002 (Discussed changesets: 8) | walczysz o te rowery? ;d Ale tym razem faktycznie oznakowanie już jest? xD commented 2025-09-08 13:16:22 UTC by Yog Sot ♦286 |
| 171483311 (Comments: 1) | Grzexs (Discussed changesets: 9) | swietne, ze tez to sie uchowalo :) commented 2025-09-08 13:16:11 UTC by MaciekMma ♦63 |
| 171616124 (Comments: 1) | Kołodziej (Discussed changesets: 2) | ale skoro plac budowy, to nie farmland ;] commented 2025-09-08 13:15:28 UTC by Yog Sot ♦286 |
| 171626476 (Comments: 1) | rollinghomesrvrepair (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171634663 commented 2025-09-08 13:15:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,894 |
| 171557808 (Comments: 2) | Pawe G (Discussed changesets: 1) | W ogóle to ja to skopałem bo miejsce które chciałem zaznaczyć jest nie w tym miejscu. Już się biorę za poprawianie. Dziękuję za czujność i pozdrawiam --- Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2025-09-08 13:12:39 UTC by Pawe G ♦1 |
| 171504125 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171634454 commented 2025-09-08 13:09:46 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171427501 (Comments: 1) | junior20 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dear junior20, Could you share the reasons for doing this changeset? I find that this changeset is inaccurate and doesn't reflect reality. 1) Hong Lim Park has been tagged as forest. Although Hong Lim Park has some trees and... commented 2025-09-08 13:06:23 UTC by B972025 ♦13 |
| 171501710 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171634147 commented 2025-09-08 13:03:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171626981 (Comments: 7) | dzidek23 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7370359269 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-09-08 13:02:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,410 |
| 171612236 (Comments: 2) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 177) | noveades para la 46 https://x.com/CiudadDeBondis/status/1964120568090792396 commented 2025-09-08 12:50:26 UTC by i2004 ♦141 |
| 171499689 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171633333 commented 2025-09-08 12:46:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171626474 (Comments: 2) | Schmitz Jérôme (Discussed changesets: 1) | O.k. ich ändere das ab. commented 2025-09-08 12:42:17 UTC by Schmitz Jérôme ♦1 |
| 171632150 (Comments: 1) | Joost_B (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Joost..., maar wat wat je wijziging hier? MVG eggie commented 2025-09-08 12:30:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171036840 (Comments: 2) | dottir34 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for referencing official information! But why can't a National Highway be a primary? The above referenced wiki page (for Vietnam) says that primaries are "National Highways", while trunks are "High-quality National H... commented 2025-09-08 12:29:21 UTC by dottir34 ♦4 |
| 171628692 (Comments: 2) | JZ-POW (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je info samengevoegd met de adresnode commented 2025-09-08 12:28:53 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171499384 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171632215 commented 2025-09-08 12:24:04 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 166461103 (Comments: 2) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, C'était une erreur de manipulation dans GoMap. Je viens de corriger. Merci beaucoup pour votre vigilence. commented 2025-09-08 12:12:27 UTC by foehn ♦7 |
| 171492517 (Comments: 4) | marw8891 (Discussed changesets: 5) | faktycznie. dzięki, mogłeś odpowiedzieć, ze zrobiłeś od razu ;d Miłego dnia commented 2025-09-08 12:11:12 UTC by Yog Sot ♦286 |
| 171598993 (Comments: 3) | Lol3556 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci pour la réponse. Donc name=Unité de soins de longue durée Prat Er Mor short_name=ULSD Prat er Mor operator=EPSM Bretagne Sud ref:FR:FINESS=560012122 social_facility=nursing_home ? Cf. https://wiki.openstr... commented 2025-09-08 12:07:10 UTC by trial ♦922 |
| 170716488 (Comments: 2) | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (Discussed changesets: 50) | Je ne sais pas... Il faudrait aller vérifier. Je ne prévois pas passer dans ce coin par contre. Vous pouvez mettre un fixme ou une note et poser la question à quelqu'un du coin. :-) commented 2025-09-08 11:54:50 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦403 |
| 171630589 (Comments: 1) | Kapis (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fuentes: http://www.xeraco.cat/wp-content/publicacions_propies/01.pdf commented 2025-09-08 11:48:02 UTC by Kapis ♦11 |
| 171499188 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171630435 commented 2025-09-08 11:44:05 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171497847 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171630273 commented 2025-09-08 11:40:01 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171611390 (Comments: 1) | dexterh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Pasa lo mismo en varias calles en el país. Se pone como name= la más usada y el resto como alt_name=. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171611390... commented 2025-09-08 11:22:54 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,473 |
| 160895054 (Comments: 1) | Generator (Discussed changesets: 2) | Das ist ja von außen nirgends zu sehen, dass das Haus "Haus Wilhelm und Grete Lanz" heisst. Das wirkt, als würden hier private Daten veröffentlicht werden, ich werde den Namen erstmal löschen. Alles gute :) commented 2025-09-08 11:11:22 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 165890694 (Comments: 1) | Generator (Discussed changesets: 2) | Warum hast du das denn bei dem ganzen Haus hinzugefügt? SEAD ist eh als Punkt gemapped (hast du auch gefunden) und SEAD ist ja nicht im kompletten Gebäude. commented 2025-09-08 11:07:50 UTC by Negreheb ♦293 |
| 164280870 (Comments: 4) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 47) | No na pewno na jezdni południowej pełnoprawny motorroad jest aż do Plejady bo znaki w Gliwicach i Zabrzu blokują. W drugą stronę jest motorroad schrödingera zależy gdzie się wjedzie ;) commented 2025-09-08 10:50:44 UTC by dzamper ♦139 |
| 171435642 (Comments: 1) | Constable7065 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Leírásodnak megfelelően volt jelölve minden, módosítascsomag visszavonva. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171627622 commented 2025-09-08 10:47:13 UTC by infeeeee ♦571 |
| 170405823 (Comments: 2) | Thibault Rommel (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hey Ik ben in verlof, ik bekijk het volgende week. commented 2025-09-08 10:45:41 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦80 |
| 171560456 (Comments: 1) | Apenot (Discussed changesets: 4) | А чому видалив назви? commented 2025-09-08 10:44:28 UTC by Myazyk ♦592 |
| 171375636 (Comments: 2) | Myazyk (Discussed changesets: 254) | Теж так вважаю commented 2025-09-08 10:43:06 UTC by Myazyk ♦592 |
| 169984646 (Comments: 4) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 153) | Hi Patchi and raturn, Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation and didn't see the messages I apologize for the duplicate way, my mistake. The duplicate had wrong tags so I will delete them Sorry for the inconvenience commented 2025-09-08 10:38:18 UTC by yoann_immergis ♦2 |
| 170967388 (Comments: 4) | HurdenShipCanal (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for informing me about the concerns involving the edits here. From Esri World Imagery, it appeared there was construction here that was not applied to the tertiary roadway tags accurately as it was, thus why there was confusion over the fea... commented 2025-09-08 10:37:27 UTC by HurdenShipCanal ♦4 |
| 171626729 (Comments: 1) | Kisarazu Funya (Discussed changesets: 1) | 其实是针布厂，笔误致歉。 commented 2025-09-08 10:30:21 UTC by Kisarazu Funya ♦4 |
| 171400023 (Comments: 3) | AndySchulte (Discussed changesets: 115) | Moin Roger, danke für deinen Hinweis – und vollkommen richtig: Die beiden Nodes 4872231789 und 4872231790 standen fälschlicherweise mit "2c" drin. Das war mir beim Prüfen nicht aufgefallen, deshalb habe ich sie j... commented 2025-09-08 10:22:20 UTC by AndySchulte ♦100 |
| 171269200 (Comments: 1) | Sylvie PORTES (Discussed changesets: 2) | rebonjour attention ici vous avez ajouté une ludothèque mais vous avez indiqué que c'est un lieu évènementiel (du genre qu'on loue pour un mariage, une fête). Il faut bien choisir la cat&ea... commented 2025-09-08 10:13:41 UTC by Patchanka ♦399 |
| 171253170 (Comments: 4) | bob3bob3 (Discussed changesets: 25) | They have all been fixed by one of my mapping colleagues. I think I got confused by the Australian Guidelines wiki using "AU" as part of a post office key (post_office:type:AU=*), but as a value in maxspeed:type Tnx for your ... commented 2025-09-08 10:12:28 UTC by bob3bob3 ♦54 |
| 171447526 (Comments: 5) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you so much! We appreciate your efforts and commitment to delivering a high-quality map! Happy mapping:) commented 2025-09-08 10:11:40 UTC by YuliyaShustava_lyft ♦55 |
| 171556436 (Comments: 2) | Interteutones (Discussed changesets: 79) | Ja, das war ein Versehen. Danke für den Hinweis! Gruß I commented 2025-09-08 10:09:29 UTC by Interteutones ♦45 |
| 171623559 (Comments: 2) | millowitsch (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hallo Pitfire, okay, verstehe ich. Fand das bisherige Tagging fand ich persönlich halte auch "zu wenig" bzw. unzureichend. commented 2025-09-08 10:07:27 UTC by millowitsch ♦2 |
| 171268590 (Comments: 1) | Sylvie PORTES (Discussed changesets: 2) | bonjour merci pour ces contributions. Petite remarque : dans OSM, on évite le tout en majuscule/tout en minuscule, on évite aussi les abréviations, et on n'oublie par les accents :-) https://www.openstreetm... commented 2025-09-08 10:01:16 UTC by Patchanka ♦399 |
| 171571399 (Comments: 1) | Benjamin Geese (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Benjamin Geese, Namen sind keine Beschreibungen. name=* wird verwendet, um den Eigennamen von Dingen anzugeben. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen VG pitfire commented 2025-09-08 09:56:41 UTC by pitfire ♦680 |
 | 171404435 (Comments: 1) | OliveraM (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please check the names you added. There are many wrong language codes like po, ua, jp, sp, tu, in Also, please add only those names which actually exist in the given language. There's no need for transliterations or plain copies of... commented 2025-09-08 09:53:28 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 170983009 (Comments: 3) | Lyon-St-Clair (Discussed changesets: 88) | Merci. J'ai corrigé les tags. commented 2025-09-08 09:52:59 UTC by frodrigo ♦51 |
| 171624426 (Comments: 1) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 58) | Fix: https://osm.org/changeset/171624854 commented 2025-09-08 09:51:29 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦185 |
| 171621935 (Comments: 1) | jasonultimatum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-08 09:50:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 169978930 (Comments: 4) | Szerkesztő (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nem kaptam reakciót sem erre, sem az üzenetre, amit írtam, így - egy nap késéssel - a korábbi címkézést visszaállítottam. Felhívom figyelmedet (mondjuk &uacut... commented 2025-09-08 09:45:48 UTC by balint36 ♦211 |
| 171620981 (Comments: 1) | Hindediou (Discussed changesets: 3) | salut, ce n'est pas téléphone la clé, c'est phone :) à toi commented 2025-09-08 09:45:32 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,254 |
| 171498663 (Comments: 1) | eixuein (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, that's exactly what the tunnel=building_passage is for. Well done commented 2025-09-08 09:42:35 UTC by dzidek23 ♦61 |
| 170039643 (Comments: 3) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 75) | ustalony czyli to pieśń przyszłość. Proszę nie mapuj obiektów które w rzeczywistości nie istnieją, bo będę zmuszony robić ci całościowe reverty. Szanujmy mapę! commented 2025-09-08 09:38:22 UTC by JulesGabrielVerne ♦111 |
| 171557554 (Comments: 4) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 19) | Oh yes. From now on, I will check more carefully my imports. It is here an error from the source. Until now I had not issue. OK. Thanks. I wiil delete this. commented 2025-09-08 09:32:52 UTC by l3BAM ♦67 |
| 154684661 (Comments: 1) | Andreas - Holbæk Kommune (Discussed changesets: 5) | Præstebrovej har nu både maxspeed=40 og maxspeed:advisory=40 På både Bing og Mapillary fra 2021 kan man se blå maxspeed:advisory=40 skilte, selvom det vestlige først starter ved Præstebrovej 44. |
| 165313275 (Comments: 2) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 7) | Grazie commented 2025-09-08 09:26:47 UTC by rumbrummer ♦15 |
| 170493086 (Comments: 3) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 200) | They will indeed shoot you xD haha. Awesome work commented 2025-09-08 09:21:29 UTC by Jimiiee ♦133 |
| 171595189 (Comments: 1) | sivan00 (Discussed changesets: 58) | שלום סיוון תודה על התיקונים אבל בעריכה של מבואת פארק תמנע שברת את היחס של שביל ישראל. תוכל להוסיף את היחס והשבילים החסרים? אם אתה לא י... commented 2025-09-08 09:19:45 UTC by hatul ♦383 |
| X | 171616817 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 365) | Hi, May you split your edit into at least two changesets? It will make reviewing the changesets much easier. Supaplex Data Working Group commented 2025-09-08 09:15:03 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,480 |
| 170969869 (Comments: 2) | fresseng (Discussed changesets: 1) | Right. Only one sign is there, forbidding cycling. commented 2025-09-08 09:14:46 UTC by fresseng ♦1 |
| 157687396 (Comments: 2) | stglei (Discussed changesets: 1) | Es sind die Wanderwege nicht korrekt eingezeichnet. Eigentlich gibt es da überhaupt keinen Weg. Dieser Abschnitt wird von Wanderern und Radfahrern nur als Abkürzung genommen. commented 2025-09-08 09:14:25 UTC by stglei ♦1 |
| 171621904 (Comments: 1) | lumixen (Discussed changesets: 1) | This one is very popular and was intentionally vandalized some time ago - see also this Strava heatmap snapshot as of 2025: https://drive.proton.me/urls/AMJSCV8M4C#IcwULzDpkeL1 commented 2025-09-08 08:51:17 UTC by lumixen ♦4 |
| 169171481 (Comments: 2) | lymkwi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, J'avoue ne pas avoir sorti mon mètre pour mesurer sur place; j'ai cru voir une gauge étroite et une plus grande qui m'avait l'air de taille standarde (1435) en comparaison. Si le contexte du lieu et de l&... commented 2025-09-08 08:49:37 UTC by lymkwi ♦2 |
| 170792869 (Comments: 1) | TooM (Discussed changesets: 1) | 贵人阁周边道路类型错误 已经一条通往虎跑景区的道路轨迹有误 commented 2025-09-08 08:29:03 UTC by dilidilip ♦1 |
| 171619253 (Comments: 1) | Loud Flag (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-09-08 08:22:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171606387 (Comments: 7) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Had gekund... of even op het forum vragen. De meeste mappers vinden het te lastig. Die routes bewerken is een aparte tak van sport. Zelf vind ik het af en toe ook nog steeds lastig. ... maar het Hanzestedenpad doet het weer :) commented 2025-09-08 08:19:14 UTC by eggie ♦41,512 |
| 171408928 (Comments: 3) | The Vyne (Discussed changesets: 6) | The Hidden Realm is closed due to safety and not accessible to anyone. It will not be reopening. commented 2025-09-08 08:15:45 UTC by The Vyne ♦2 |
| 166118780 (Comments: 1) | Erik vd S (Discussed changesets: 22) | Er is een note waarin staat dat het pad (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385621233) niet bestaat, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4880684. Kunt u dit even kort in de note uitleggen? commented 2025-09-08 08:15:18 UTC by lyctkel ♦338 |
| 171603143 (Comments: 1) | Plant_thief (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. The café is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13028550205 If the new location is the correct one, the old node can be moved. Otherwise, this duplicate should be deleted. Thanks. commented 2025-09-08 08:02:25 UTC by gmar5 ♦73 |
| 160545772 (Comments: 1) | W-HEC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, je travaillais autour de la gare de Nîmes quand j'ai remarqué qu'il y a beaucoup de nodes qui sont exactement au même endroit (et même level) mais qui ne sont pas merge. Est ce que c'est volontaire ? Par e... commented 2025-09-08 07:56:14 UTC by Sylv1_Durif ♦15 |
| 171444607 (Comments: 8) | NEWHerfs (Discussed changesets: 4) | Perfekt, danke! commented 2025-09-08 07:43:12 UTC by NEWHerfs ♦2 |