| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 179226509 (Comments: 1) | JhowieNitnek (Discussed changesets: 188) | misschien nog een water=river met water=river area maken zodat de meanders zichtbaar zijn? commented 2026-03-01 22:51:13 UTC by Joske1020 ♦25 |
 | 175312474 (Comments: 1) | Dr Centerline (Discussed changesets: 9) | I saw the note on the road here. Very interesting! Seems like a perfect thing to capture in a name:etymology or name:etymology:wikidata tag! commented 2026-03-01 22:36:32 UTC by watmildon ♦291 |
 | 179110148 (Comments: 3) | knarlyhurricane (Discussed changesets: 2) | They're not needed in Australia, as we have full mapping of those as relations and those are used when geocoding. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179110148 commented 2026-03-01 22:32:13 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,486 |
 | 178477864 (Comments: 8) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 19) | sur ggle streetview (image 2024) le resto semble s'appeler l'iode, mais c'est incohérent avec le site web : je te laisse vérifier et corriger si besoin commented 2026-03-01 22:25:32 UTC by Yunan973 ♦91 |
| 179229272 (Comments: 1) | Ampersand Fitness (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-01 22:18:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 179211808 (Comments: 4) | moritz2k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Habe es korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179229239 commented 2026-03-01 22:17:14 UTC by moritz2k ♦1 |
 | 178852199 (Comments: 3) | Michał Kuptel (Discussed changesets: 2) | od kiedy to doświadczenie commented 2026-03-01 22:13:54 UTC by Yog Sot ♦428 |
 | 179229151 (Comments: 1) | Luisa Córdoba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-01 22:12:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179217164 (Comments: 1) | Michallll97 (Discussed changesets: 1) | na pewno wszystkie te drogi są juz zbudowane? commented 2026-03-01 22:12:23 UTC by Yog Sot ♦428 |
 | 132866415 (Comments: 1) | Pravaz 2GT6 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salut, est ce que cet arrêt de bus https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9274374661 est volontairement placé ici ? commented 2026-03-01 22:09:41 UTC by liums ♦6 |
 | 170941337 (Comments: 1) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hallo, bitte verklebe landuses wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424656439 nicht mit der Straße. Selbst wenn nicht dieselben Punkte verwendet werden, macht das das Editieren sehr mühsam und generiert z.B. in Osmose Fehlermeldunge... commented 2026-03-01 22:08:22 UTC by wolfbert ♦123 |
 | 179200674 (Comments: 1) | anydiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | прямо во дворе? commented 2026-03-01 22:06:01 UTC by 4004 ♦1,938 |
| 179131325 (Comments: 2) | munnniisss (Discussed changesets: 2) | Декантер там уже есть, так что видимо второе, поправил commented 2026-03-01 22:04:35 UTC by 4004 ♦1,938 |
 | 172910704 (Comments: 1) | Onzd (Discussed changesets: 10) | שלום עופר אני מניח שאין פה מערה, אז לא נכון לתייג ככה commented 2026-03-01 22:02:47 UTC by hatul ♦439 |
| 179131202 (Comments: 1) | munnniisss (Discussed changesets: 2) | спасибо за правку. с виду там будто не 3 этажа? commented 2026-03-01 22:02:09 UTC by 4004 ♦1,938 |
 | 179004935 (Comments: 2) | vellare (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. I marked the place where people practice horse riding. Riding a horse in a circle. It's called a hippodrome or something. I've been there too. Now it seems to be abandoned. The owners left because of the war commented 2026-03-01 21:55:49 UTC by vellare ♦1 |
| 171468483 (Comments: 1) | Daniel LE Jackson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Daniel, bei allen 62 von Dir eingetragenen Meilensteinen zwischen hier und Change Set 171472425 sollte bei distance=* als Dezimaltrennzeichen statt "," ein "." stehen. commented 2026-03-01 21:52:57 UTC by wolfbert ♦123 |
 | 179057820 (Comments: 2) | Papweer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks commented 2026-03-01 21:49:26 UTC by Papweer ♦1 |
| 178845762 (Comments: 2) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hm, ich glaube städtisches Leitsystem trifft das am besten. Trage ich bei Gelegenheit mal nach, danke für den Hinweis. commented 2026-03-01 21:49:23 UTC by stirps ♦27 |
| 179110149 (Comments: 1) | toster234 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Preferowane jest pozostawienie punktu z prefixem 'disused' np. 'disused:amenity=restaurant'. W ten sposób użytkownicy aplikacji StreetComplete czy EveryDoor będą widzieli, że należy sprawdzić, co nowego się w tym mie... commented 2026-03-01 21:46:56 UTC by Rogoyski ♦247 |
| 150840226 (Comments: 2) | avolson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Not to mention your edits are a bit sloppy in that the fairway is crossing over the green. It should never do that. commented 2026-03-01 21:36:59 UTC by b-jazz ♦814 |
| 179218929 (Comments: 1) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 81) | what exactly did you fix? commented 2026-03-01 21:26:18 UTC by synthfi ♦11 |
| 178991731 (Comments: 2) | confuduck (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo kadiwa, danke für den Hinweis. Das kann ich nachvollziehen und werde in Zukunft darauf achten. Grüße zurück! commented 2026-03-01 21:18:35 UTC by confuduck ♦1 |
| 167743511 (Comments: 1) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hier auch: Wäre es dann nicht information=route_marker und bicycle=yes ? commented 2026-03-01 21:11:07 UTC by DeFra85 ♦290 |
 | 179226448 (Comments: 4) | JackArock (Discussed changesets: 9) | Nee.. want graphhopper geeft de voorkeur aan verharde wegen als die in de buurt liggen. In osm router kun je dat niet instellen. commented 2026-03-01 21:10:24 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 167743127 (Comments: 1) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 74) | Wäre es dann nicht information=route_marker und bicycle=yes ? commented 2026-03-01 21:10:18 UTC by DeFra85 ♦290 |
| 133791457 (Comments: 1) | defire (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo defire, kannst du zu diesem Hinweis was sagen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5147132 ? Ist der Hydrant nur aus Versehen auf's Feld gerutscht? commented 2026-03-01 21:08:44 UTC by söm4324 ♦54 |
| 179223889 (Comments: 10) | JackArock (Discussed changesets: 9) | ah. dus dat duurt nog even.. wel lang voordat ook graphhopper dat doorheeft, want die werkt ook nog niet, evenals de andere routers. commented 2026-03-01 21:07:18 UTC by JackArock ♦6 |
| 179225269 (Comments: 1) | otto07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Otto :) bei Verrücken der Kirche im Nordosten ist dir ein node auf die Wohngebietsfläche gesprungen. Ungünstig. Eine Bitte: Achte auf deine Änderungssatzkommentare und darauf, dass du nicht Änderungen an zw... commented 2026-03-01 20:57:57 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 179224931 (Comments: 1) | GenGap (Discussed changesets: 12) | Moin :) level=1 bedeutet 1. OG. Bist du dir da sicher? Oft ist das EG ja leicht erhöht gebaut, weshalb ja auch die Treppe da ist. Da wäre dann level=0 angebracht. cheers --- Publis... commented 2026-03-01 20:55:43 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 177395134 (Comments: 1) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 291) | Ciekawostka: wg https://www.osiedle-mlodych.pl/o-firmie/galeria/ i https://www.iwaw.pl/obiekt.php?id=osiedle-marokanska budynki Libijskiej zarówno jednorodzinne, jak i ten wielorodzinny tworzą osiedle Lasek. Można sprawdzić, czy naz... commented 2026-03-01 20:53:06 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦371 |
| 178326125 (Comments: 2) | NikoNomas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry but I do not follow all of the technical details of what you describe above, and please excuse my ignorance, but I don't understand how all of that relates to me attempting to add the locale "Bike & Roll" - https://www.openst... commented 2026-03-01 20:44:59 UTC by NikoNomas ♦2 |
 | 179121143 (Comments: 3) | Iwebmaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | No, nessun raddoppio di ciclabile. Forse si voleva inserire pista dedicata alla navetta elettrica? Attendo contatti da utente o interventi in questi cambiamenti(changeset). commented 2026-03-01 20:44:28 UTC by LucianoC63 ♦3 |
| 179224492 (Comments: 2) | Una tantum (Discussed changesets: 14) | Sistemato https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179226226 commented 2026-03-01 20:41:04 UTC by Mannivu ♦258 |
 | 179156896 (Comments: 3) | Gregory Kirkendall (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you have visited it yourself then no further source is necessary and you can use source=survey. It would probably be best to add a lifecycle prefix like "abandoned:" to the main key of the features so that it doesn't get add... commented 2026-03-01 20:39:14 UTC by InsertUser ♦476 |
| 178936997 (Comments: 2) | NikoNomas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Five Below (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13592432401) is on the ground floor (international floor 0). Ross (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301241459) is located directly above Five Below, on first and second elevated floors, or intern... commented 2026-03-01 20:35:27 UTC by NikoNomas ♦2 |
| 179223359 (Comments: 3) | JackArock (Discussed changesets: 9) | Nogmaals.. het is een informal=yes olifantenpad.. niet bedoeld voor motorvoertuigen al zou het wel kunnen. Voor jezelf zou je routering mogelijk maken door de instelling te veranderen naar voetganger of fietser. .. en onverhard vermijden uit te sc... commented 2026-03-01 20:34:08 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
 | 177654878 (Comments: 4) | YanikB (Discussed changesets: 28) | voir www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179224032 Corrige infos contradictoires bases géospatiales vs CEHQ et convention Baie-James vS Rivière Vincelotte ET Rivière Laforge > début Laforge seuil sortie bassin Fontages e... commented 2026-03-01 20:32:24 UTC by PierZen ♦283 |
 | 178951001 (Comments: 4) | Olgerts V (Discussed changesets: 3) | After discussion in OSM's chat, and since your approach seems to be the best what is currently possible with existing tooling, I would like to retract my request of you stopping: please proceed with creation of route=road at will. Link to... commented 2026-03-01 20:30:38 UTC by markalex- ♦13 |
| 108245747 (Comments: 2) | JhowieNitnek (Discussed changesets: 188) | Broekmeanders is een artificele beek dus stream is het ook niet commented 2026-03-01 20:25:04 UTC by JhowieNitnek ♦184 |
| 179225422 (Comments: 1) | tyfi (Discussed changesets: 422) | The western campus border is the city line, so I glued those together. commented 2026-03-01 20:23:06 UTC by tyfi ♦438 |
| 179188162 (Comments: 1) | Mika Schulz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Hydranten haben keine Namen. Eventuell kann man sie nach description verschieben, noch besser wäre aber, sie ersatzlos zu löschen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-01 20:18:32 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,366 |
| 179225174 (Comments: 1) | Kamil Kalata (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ortofotomapy czasowe użyte w tym zestawie zmian składały się ze zdjęć wykonanych w dniach 13 września 2023 roku oraz 21 czerwca 2024 roku. commented 2026-03-01 20:16:01 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦66 |
| 162472033 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 70) | Thanks for tidying up! commented 2026-03-01 20:10:41 UTC by watmildon ♦291 |
| 38307084 (Comments: 1) | jdalco (Discussed changesets: 2) | obliterated railroad right of ways need to be added to open historical map commented 2026-03-01 20:09:22 UTC by Natfoot ♦82 |
| 108383053 (Comments: 1) | JhowieNitnek (Discussed changesets: 188) | dit is geen kanaal. een kanaal is volgens osm een grote artificiële waterweg, en anders (bij drainage) een sloot of een afwateringskanaal. Ik zal het oplossen. commented 2026-03-01 20:06:03 UTC by Joske1020 ♦25 |
| 179220107 (Comments: 2) | Schlumpfhasenbär (Discussed changesets: 23) | gelöscht... Gut das du aufpasst.... :-) Schönen Abend noch! commented 2026-03-01 20:04:12 UTC by Schlumpfhasenbär ♦24 |
| 179083959 (Comments: 7) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 135) | wollte jetzt nicht negativ klingen oder so... Aber eben bei diesen Fahrplanfeldern finde ich halt wirklich keinen nutzbaren Aspekt.. Dass man die Fahrplanfelder weglassen und Streckennummern korrekt erfassen könnte behalte ich mal im H... commented 2026-03-01 20:03:11 UTC by Piagno ♦125 |
| 149304878 (Comments: 1) | ms-h (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo ms-h, ich habe diesen Changeset größtenteils rückgängig gemacht. Die Geometrie des Gymnasiums wurde nämlich deutlich verschlechtert, vorher war sie ziemlich einwandfrei. Außerdem sollen einzelne Objekte wie Re... commented 2026-03-01 19:53:08 UTC by kadiwa ♦70 |
| 179216863 (Comments: 1) | martin_bighomer (Discussed changesets: 1) | revert -> Lebenszyklus für abgerissene Gebäude Hallo martin_bighomer, vielen Dank für Deine Ortskenntnisse. Die abgerissenen Gebäude sind immer noch auf aktuellen Luftbildern sichtbar. Beim Löschen besteht die Gefah... commented 2026-03-01 19:36:19 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,406 |
| 179131904 (Comments: 1) | Charles Foulon (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bonjour Charles, Vous avez déplacé https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466627188 plus au sud pour l’aligner avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466627190. Certes à l’époque, je n&rsq... commented 2026-03-01 19:35:03 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦80 |
| 179216509 (Comments: 1) | lat2001 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi :) bitte die Wege (highway=track und ähnliche) nicht mit landuse=* verbinden. Danke. Grüße aus Korbach silversurfer83 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/cha... commented 2026-03-01 19:29:51 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 179207608 (Comments: 3) | Waldamsel (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo, das Wiki ist an dieser Stelle eindeutig, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bridge: „Im Zusammenhang mit dem Tag man_made= kann der Key bridge=*, um den Brückentyp anzugeben, auch an Flächen verwendet werden.“<... commented 2026-03-01 19:21:48 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,366 |
| 179198269 (Comments: 2) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 135) | Danke, habe sie entfernt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179222897 commented 2026-03-01 19:08:24 UTC by Piagno ♦125 |
| 179004555 (Comments: 2) | Jarek 🚲 (Discussed changesets: 119) | Makes sense. We do need some better way to indicate the consistent use of a lane for parking though... I think I remember that there is some means of tagging this properly but I haven't had the time to really look into it. commented 2026-03-01 19:02:31 UTC by Nate Wessel ♦60 |
| 179219726 (Comments: 1) | rebeccanara (Discussed changesets: 2) | the feature added in this changeset is on land on the latest imagery (Esri World Imagery) even though it is tagged as man_made=pier so logically it should be at least partially over water. Thus it would be wonderful if you would double check the posi... commented 2026-03-01 19:00:55 UTC by Udarian ♦664 |
| 158436509 (Comments: 2) | -=|MisterY|=- (Discussed changesets: 23) | fixed, thanks! commented 2026-03-01 18:59:57 UTC by -=|MisterY|=- ♦22 |
 | 179133159 (Comments: 1) | sergej zhiliackov (Discussed changesets: 9) | Википедия с этим не согласна)) commented 2026-03-01 18:58:49 UTC by FUZZY_42 ♦25 |
| 179219624 (Comments: 1) | rebeccanara (Discussed changesets: 2) | Generally names are not supposed to be used for descriptions and this changeset seems to do so. Also I was wondering what your source for this changeset is as I do not see evidence of any of these features on the latest imagery in this area(Esri Worl... commented 2026-03-01 18:56:35 UTC by Udarian ♦664 |
| 174528634 (Comments: 1) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 19) | Je suis déçu. Je suis passé tout à l’heure et rien n’a bougé. commented 2026-03-01 18:51:02 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦80 |
 | 179222112 (Comments: 1) | Houseofmusicians (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-01 18:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179201054 (Comments: 1) | Der Brummbär (Discussed changesets: 2) | Das Format für Telefonnummern ist hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone. Also die führende Null bei der Ortsnetzkennzahl weglassen. commented 2026-03-01 18:48:03 UTC by george1201 ♦282 |
 | 179186480 (Comments: 2) | michal_tulach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Deletions appear legit, previous building traces were rubbish commented 2026-03-01 18:46:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,552 |
| 179201621 (Comments: 1) | Der Brummbär (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Brummbär. Willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe eine Anmerkung zu deiner Änderung. Um ein Geschäft als geschlossen zu kennzeichnen, gibt es den Lebenszyklus-Präfix, beschrieben auf der Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/D... commented 2026-03-01 18:43:28 UTC by george1201 ♦282 |
| 178941238 (Comments: 1) | sauerland-radfahrer (Discussed changesets: 27) | Moin, sehe ich richtig, dass du den Radweg wieder hinzugefügt hast in dem Änderungssatz? Ich hatte ihn ursprünglich entfernt, da dieser nicht mehr existiert. (Liegt innerhalb einer Baustelle/abgerissen; die neue Brücken-/St... commented 2026-03-01 18:25:11 UTC by AlbertUnruh ♦2 |
| 178301092 (Comments: 1) | Bandino (Discussed changesets: 3) | Salut, Pour info : j'ai repéré pas mal de doublons dans les ajouts d'adresses (ex : Rue de la Vigne, déjà renseignée en "AssociatedStreet"). Est-ce que l'on enlève les relations po... commented 2026-03-01 18:15:30 UTC by karr4s ♦54 |
| 179218810 (Comments: 1) | Michi_07 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hallo, das Ziehen von zusätzlichen footway auf platform habe ich so bisher noch nicht gesehen. Ist irgendwo beschrieben, dass man das tun soll? Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-01 18:08:49 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,366 |
 | 179196555 (Comments: 1) | Neethu P G (Discussed changesets: 363) | Hi Neethu. Please keep the changesets within smaller bboxes. Edit a street in Mexico and save the changes. Then edit a street in Sydney. It helps a lot people who are "taking care or bboxes". Thanks. commented 2026-03-01 18:05:53 UTC by muralito ♦2,122 |
| 179216368 (Comments: 1) | Michi_07 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hallo, darf ich fragen, warum deine einzige Änderung im Umdrehen der Richtung besteht? Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-01 18:04:43 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,366 |
 | 179220502 (Comments: 1) | Reborn Autoparts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-01 18:03:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179201352 (Comments: 1) | Michi_07 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hallo, bitte Sachen nicht ändern, nur weil sie dem eigenen Geschmack nicht entsprechen. Es ist üblich, dass turning_circle als gemeinsamer Knoten für abgehende Wege genutzt wird. Es wäre doch schade, wenn das jeden zweiten... commented 2026-03-01 18:01:49 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,366 |
| 179200371 (Comments: 1) | barley383 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ho, ça faisait quelques années que je me disais qu'il fallait que je me fasse un tour les lignes pour relever les vitesses max et les ajouter à OSM. Il a eu plus rapide que moi ! Bon courage à toi ! commented 2026-03-01 17:39:11 UTC by Virgile1994 ♦42 |
 | 179194135 (Comments: 2) | Nevolin Dmitriy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Приветствую! Логика была направлена на ПО и сервисы, которые лучше едят латиницу. Могу ошибаться в целом и общем, но не нарочно. Может вы п... commented 2026-03-01 17:37:15 UTC by Nevolin Dmitriy ♦1 |
| 171580826 (Comments: 2) | Showmazter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, hat keinen Namen, kein Straßenschild vorhanden. commented 2026-03-01 17:33:43 UTC by Showmazter ♦1 |
 | 178861890 (Comments: 2) | Khit Thit Thwé (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178975103 commented 2026-03-01 17:33:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178857577 (Comments: 2) | Cris010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178957297 commented 2026-03-01 17:33:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178868878 (Comments: 2) | Zulfi mARKETING (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179219452 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-01 17:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178858065 (Comments: 2) | NickZooku (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178859563 commented 2026-03-01 17:33:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178852547 (Comments: 2) | ON-LINEmedia T (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179219448 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-01 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178852093 (Comments: 2) | sphinx krakow (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179219447 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-01 17:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178851620 (Comments: 2) | awittpro (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179219445 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-01 17:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178852012 (Comments: 2) | awittpro (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179219445 commented 2026-03-01 17:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178845714 (Comments: 2) | Green America Tree & Landscaping (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179219443 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-01 17:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
 | 178845503 (Comments: 2) | Shasiru (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179219442 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-01 17:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 179213473 (Comments: 1) | europium152 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-01 17:26:46 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179218395 (Comments: 1) | Grasreithof (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-01 17:09:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179196946 (Comments: 3) | Nzau (Discussed changesets: 74) | OK pour l’extraction. À publier aussi sur le forum en parallèle, car je veux bien m’y coller uniquement sur les environs de mon territoire. commented 2026-03-01 17:06:50 UTC by Axelos ♦110 |
 | 179186233 (Comments: 4) | wwjd2022 (Discussed changesets: 13) | It is great that Lithuania is mapped in an excellent way. In some other countries and especially other continents the rapid editor data can be helpful, at least that is what I think 🙃. Have a great Sunday evening! commented 2026-03-01 17:04:37 UTC by wwjd2022 ♦6 |
| 176775932 (Comments: 2) | Reuce (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die beiden Poller sind vom Typ bollard=flexible. Er ist also aus weichem Kunststoff, um Verletzungen zu verhindern. commented 2026-03-01 17:00:32 UTC by Reuce ♦1 |
 | 179075442 (Comments: 1) | MOTILAL KHAREL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179218082 commented 2026-03-01 16:59:15 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 134678771 (Comments: 1) | FeWoRupprecht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast damals die keys für die Ferienwohnungsvermietung direkt am Haus getaggt. Es mag die überwiegende Nutzung sein, aber das Gebäude umfasst auch noch andere Einrichtungen (Bistro,Cafe,shop). Ich schlage deshalb vor, die Verm... commented 2026-03-01 16:50:55 UTC by urk ♦31 |
 | 179148348 (Comments: 1) | HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Revert of 179096219 commented 2026-03-01 16:40:41 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
 | 178766462 (Comments: 2) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 41) | Защото е написано на шльокавица. Не се пише ритейл, а retail. Ако искате да го изпишете на английски използайте name:en. На български правилната ... commented 2026-03-01 16:31:02 UTC by Termininja ♦8 |
| 14920773 (Comments: 1) | erwin6330 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wo kommt der angebliche Name "Nösslach" (bei Huben linksufrig) her? In TIRIS gegenwärtig "Achenaltarm" benannt. commented 2026-03-01 16:09:01 UTC by kuhni74 ♦424 |
| 179117814 (Comments: 1) | PSA Payment Services Austria GmbH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Den Bankomaten gibt es noch nicht. Soll aber in den nächsten Wochen soweit sein. Die exakte Position wird hier auch nicht stimmen. Hab ihn mal als proposed geändert und ein fixme für die Position angehängt commented 2026-03-01 16:01:29 UTC by XimeX ♦90 |
| 179186709 (Comments: 1) | JMRosenfeld (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please correct the tagging of the footway. The access=private is sufficient. Besides, this is in a gated milliitary area. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179186709 ... commented 2026-03-01 16:01:00 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 179186743 (Comments: 1) | JMRosenfeld (Discussed changesets: 4) | I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish, the steps are already tagged as private so the tag foot=private makes no sense. Please remove. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2026-03-01 15:57:52 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 179137113 (Comments: 2) | Silviopen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ti ringrazio per il chiarimento, non conoscevo questo aspetto. commented 2026-03-01 15:51:12 UTC by Silviopen ♦2 |
| 137654688 (Comments: 2) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 267) | done commented 2026-03-01 15:02:20 UTC by ma-rt-in ♦1,762 |
| 125302283 (Comments: 1) | ofirvedalit (Discussed changesets: 4) | אפיקי נחל or אפיקי נחל? commented 2026-03-01 15:01:04 UTC by Sanniu ♦626 |
| 179212157 (Comments: 1) | VKTRSLMN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-01 14:54:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179188098 (Comments: 1) | Elefant aus Wuppertal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hei, also am Donnerstag gegen 18:30 Uhr war die neue Verlängerung des Tunnels und auch der Aufzug alles Baustelle und abgesperrt... Dazu war jetzt auch ein Artikel hier in der Lausitzer.... Ich vermute, man wird noch ein "paar" Tage... commented 2026-03-01 14:53:57 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,129 |
| 179108413 (Comments: 2) | Alan Bragg (Discussed changesets: 90) | Thank for the comment. The estimated 390,000 pools in the Phoenix area are of two common types: geometrical and free form. Kidney shaped pools are common. I was using several representative shapes and re-sizing and orienting them to get a good approx... commented 2026-03-01 14:50:54 UTC by Alan Bragg ♦154 |
| 179203499 (Comments: 2) | Maladignia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt! commented 2026-03-01 14:09:34 UTC by Maladignia ♦1 |
| 154245601 (Comments: 2) | OSMDoudou (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Thanks for reporting. The notation with '/' is visible on websites mentioning the lawyers but I verified on the buildings and it's noted with'.', so I adapted that way. commented 2026-03-01 13:54:01 UTC by OSMDoudou ♦19 |
| 175920212 (Comments: 1) | Kwantsin (Discussed changesets: 1) | 请问来源是？ commented 2026-03-01 13:41:46 UTC by jack walker2 ♦11 |
| 179187166 (Comments: 2) | threefoursixninefour (Discussed changesets: 15) | Vielen Danke für Ihre Nachrict und dafür, dass Sie mich an den Default für Absperrungen erinnert haben. Jetzt habe ich access=yes an alles hinzugefügt; wenn nötig, jemand, der die Winterbeschränkungen besser kennt, kan... commented 2026-03-01 13:40:06 UTC by threefoursixninefour ♦11 |
 | 179178658 (Comments: 2) | Tadasuki (Discussed changesets: 2) | 感谢，我会参考标注指南修正我的编辑 commented 2026-03-01 13:35:55 UTC by Tadasuki ♦2 |
| 179154379 (Comments: 1) | menorman (Discussed changesets: 3) | With regard to this node where you added a highway=crossing tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8346414748 I cannot see any crossing on aerial imagery. If there is no formal crossing at places like this, then you do not need to add ... commented 2026-03-01 13:34:16 UTC by CRCulver ♦211 |
| 179206881 (Comments: 2) | meeuw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi @Geim, ik heb er geen plannen mee, hier fietsen mag in ieder geval niet meer (zie de borden). Ik heb er niet heel goed op gelet maar volgens mij staan deze fietsroutes niet met bordjes aangegeven en heb ik geen idee hoe ze dit bedacht hebb... commented 2026-03-01 13:31:19 UTC by meeuw ♦2 |
 | 179179229 (Comments: 1) | fabiojs (Discussed changesets: 2) | A ponte da Rua Nossa Senhora Aparecida não foi colapsada, mas apenas interditada. Então vou reverter a mudança de colapsada para interditada. E hoje, 01/03 possivelmente será liberada. commented 2026-03-01 13:26:29 UTC by Gabriel de Oliveira Aparecido ♦2 |
 | 179184501 (Comments: 8) | thomas930 (Discussed changesets: 2) | For Issue 1, if most of you feel uncomforted, I can delete all my work on house number based on my announced citation. I will not delete the object as I draw them from Satellite Map. I have already indicated "aerial imagery" as one of my so... commented 2026-03-01 13:19:40 UTC by thomas930 ♦3 |
| 177526153 (Comments: 1) | RLCO (Discussed changesets: 3) | Attention : cette zone de travaux est active, et vérifiée sur le terrain. L'imagerie BD Ortho IGN précède le début des travaux, c'est pourquoi elle n'y est pas visible. commented 2026-03-01 13:18:41 UTC by quentinsto ♦3 |
 | 177271595 (Comments: 2) | timichal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I understand about the orthophotos, but transport on the line to Svojšín is indeed scheduled similarly to previous years: see https://www.spravazeleznic.cz/documents/50004227/184392685/k186.pdf/e826db2c-6be7-41f9-9b16-f8d90550d4de, ... commented 2026-03-01 13:18:09 UTC by timichal ♦1 |
| 174471156 (Comments: 1) | HirschKauz (Discussed changesets: 34) | Pöse .. 6 Ausrufezeichen in der Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5183576 ;-) commented 2026-03-01 13:14:23 UTC by tux67 ♦2,019 |
| 179201878 (Comments: 4) | Mariusthefifth (Discussed changesets: 1) | format opening_hours Taratoer aangepast commented 2026-03-01 13:11:39 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179207468 (Comments: 1) | 1d0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-01 13:06:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177959687 (Comments: 1) | xoroc (Discussed changesets: 11) | Your changesets are missing a source. Some items can not be quickly verified. For example, HIT-HOT does not exist according to the official documentation: https://ethz.ch/en/campus/getting-to-know/cafes-restaurants-shops/gastronomy/restaurants-and-ca... commented 2026-03-01 13:00:16 UTC by Makeena ♦50 |
| 179195572 (Comments: 2) | Samuel BT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Appreciate your comment. I will follow. Thank you! commented 2026-03-01 12:58:14 UTC by Samuel BT ♦1 |
| 138216999 (Comments: 1) | Nicolas Brouilly (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bonjour Nicolas Brouilly, Juste pour information, vous avez ajouté beaucoup de pistes cyclables, alors qu'il s'agissait de bandes cyclables. Je m'occupe des corrections. Pour plus d'infos, voir la page ... commented 2026-03-01 12:54:04 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦21 |
| 172774143 (Comments: 1) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonjour, cette modification était fausse, la rue Dénoyez est bien piétonne. Si vous vous basez sur des traces GPS, c'est une mauvaise indication (le trafic pour desservir la rue est autorisée mais la rue est né... commented 2026-03-01 12:50:29 UTC by Britzz ♦253 |
| 179167554 (Comments: 1) | Rene Widdau (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, du hast hier den Defi gelöscht, ohne eine Quelle deiner Information anzugeben. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments Was war der Grund? Gruß tux67 --- ... commented 2026-03-01 12:49:46 UTC by tux67 ♦2,019 |
| 179203229 (Comments: 3) | liloy84 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kwaad kan het niet. We taggen het wel bv op een tweerichting fietsroronde of paralleflfietspad als aanwijzing voor een volgende mapper die oneway=yes onterecht wil taggen. Groet, eggie commented 2026-03-01 12:47:13 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179177115 (Comments: 1) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 103) | Hi, I found 60 signals with a "railway:signal:minor:state" tag. Some of them also have a "railway:signal:minor:states" tag. Could you check & fix that? commented 2026-03-01 12:24:57 UTC by mueschel ♦6,938 |
 | 46093994 (Comments: 1) | Thunder08 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, where do you have the address Palackeho 35/1 from? On building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56305186 . commented 2026-03-01 12:23:35 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,803 |
| 178548905 (Comments: 3) | Yanivdu (Discussed changesets: 11) | תודה, שיחזרתי את החלק המחוק. בבקשה להיזהר, במיוחד בשביל ישראל שהוא חשוב מאוד. commented 2026-03-01 12:20:40 UTC by hatul ♦439 |
| 179136483 (Comments: 3) | RafaelKiendler128 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke @Luzandro Fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179201641 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179201641 commented 2026-03-01 12:17:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 173805826 (Comments: 2) | sebastienserre (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour @pyrog, Je ne sais plus ce que j'ai voulu signaler mais si je l'ai fait, c'est suite a une constatation sur place lors d'une sortie VTT commented 2026-03-01 12:12:04 UTC by sebastienserre ♦3 |
| 179167704 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 128) | Are you sure about the two left-turn-only relations? I can't see anything in the pics I took during my surveys. Can't see any restrictions in recent bus videos either. commented 2026-03-01 12:09:14 UTC by kingkingHK ♦105 |
| 179202605 (Comments: 1) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, in France "BDOrtho IGN" is the best imagery available. Your changes are offset, please fix them with BDOrtho IGN. commented 2026-03-01 12:03:57 UTC by Syl ♦1,033 |
| 179168888 (Comments: 2) | Yan Bakhmat (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ok, I will make the corrections, thanks for the comments. commented 2026-03-01 11:59:27 UTC by Yan Bakhmat ♦3 |
| 179164858 (Comments: 1) | bulatoff (Discussed changesets: 3) | поле name - для имен собственных, а не описаний типа "грейдер" commented 2026-03-01 11:58:17 UTC by literan ♦6,995 |
| 179200248 (Comments: 3) | Paweł Srebro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dodaję poprawiony zrzut ekranu https://postimg.cc/SnBn3qhW commented 2026-03-01 11:57:13 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦609 |
 | 178566538 (Comments: 1) | Copymaster86 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please take the width of a track into consideration when you map a trace. This trace https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1478710702/history#map=16/-17.93324/49.09883 is mostly <2 mtr wide, thus not an unclassi... commented 2026-03-01 11:54:00 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179204720 (Comments: 1) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 42) | didn't find the changeset that deleted this section, so I mapped it again commented 2026-03-01 11:53:47 UTC by Makeena ♦50 |
| 130607568 (Comments: 1) | eumiro (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hallo, der assembly point X (10291567610) heißt nicht wirklich X, oder? commented 2026-03-01 11:51:16 UTC by wolfbert ♦123 |
| 97931713 (Comments: 1) | messfix (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, ich würde die Numerierung der Stationen in ref oder description verschieben. Die Teile heißen nicht wirklich so, oder? commented 2026-03-01 11:48:21 UTC by wolfbert ♦123 |
| 179170956 (Comments: 2) | TCF85 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, Danke für das sachlich richtige Feedback! Ich wollte die Hydranten in meiner Gemeinde hier mal eintragen, allerdings habe ich darin noch keine Erfahrung. commented 2026-03-01 11:42:08 UTC by TCF85 ♦1 |
| 179198079 (Comments: 3) | Schlumpfhasenbär (Discussed changesets: 23) | alles klar :) genieß den Sonntag --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179198079 commented 2026-03-01 11:34:34 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 158132974 (Comments: 1) | xoroc (Discussed changesets: 11) | don't delete ways, they have to be kept as disused or similar for future reuse, history etc. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179204081 commented 2026-03-01 11:33:10 UTC by Makeena ♦50 |
| 179203784 (Comments: 1) | tyr_asd (Discussed changesets: 54) | see also https://www.op-online.de/region/langen/radschnellweg-bruecke-zwischen-langen-und-egelsbach-wieder-befahrbar-91866806.html commented 2026-03-01 11:27:00 UTC by tyr_asd ♦463 |
| 179149532 (Comments: 2) | KiddiKai (Discussed changesets: 11) | Moin! Am westlichen Ende, wo der Radweg in den Kreisverkehr mündet, steht ein DE:237,1012-31 (Radweg Ende). Daraus habe ich bicycle=designated geschlossen. Ich war leider unter Zeitdruck und konnte insbesondere das östliche Ende nich... commented 2026-03-01 10:56:20 UTC by KiddiKai ♦15 |
| 148222445 (Comments: 7) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Nö, war auch falsch. Am Gutenbergplatz hatte ich auch den gleichen Fehler gemacht, zudem ich auch nicht weiß, wie viele Halte davon in Mainz auch eingetragen sind. commented 2026-03-01 10:53:28 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦255 |
| 179202020 (Comments: 2) | Wess-bzr (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications commented 2026-03-01 10:47:05 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 177497586 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hallo Michael Spitzenberger, ich stolpere gerade wieder über einen Änderungssatz von dir. Hier hast du einigen Straßen den Ortsnamen Sufferloh gegeben. Diese Straßen haben keinen Namen. In diesem Teil des Ortes werden die... commented 2026-03-01 10:46:29 UTC by Rainero ♦609 |
| 128289124 (Comments: 1) | AndySchulte (Discussed changesets: 118) | Hi, woher kommt der Stadtteil „Großkuchen“ in Langenlonsheim? commented 2026-03-01 10:45:37 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦415 |
| 179196325 (Comments: 1) | planplan38 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! Merci d'avoir repositionné le point d'adresse, qui doit effectivement se situer entre la propriété et le domaine public. J'ai corrigé le bâtiment dont la ... commented 2026-03-01 10:40:30 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 178788448 (Comments: 2) | enzo_immergis (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour FrançoisR, Je pensais vous avoir déjà répondu. Merci beaucoup pour votre signalement. Un autre contributeur a déjà réparé mes erreurs. J'essaierai d'augmenter mo... commented 2026-03-01 10:33:07 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦21 |
| 178756208 (Comments: 1) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 7) | wrong mapping. read this document please https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification rverting commented 2026-03-01 10:22:44 UTC by literan ♦6,995 |
| 179189987 (Comments: 1) | s:s (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Postfilialen werden nach dem Schema "Postfiliale im Einzelhandel" eingetragen. Siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office#%22Postfiliale%22_im_Einzelhandel Weiterhin frohes Mappen u Gru&... commented 2026-03-01 10:18:25 UTC by surveyor54 ♦668 |
| 179201341 (Comments: 1) | Carrillo Funeral Home - North Fort Worth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-01 10:15:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 179201241 (Comments: 1) | Spletni Uspeh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-01 10:12:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 179173748 (Comments: 2) | Aurimas Fišeras (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hi, Time zone (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16819468/history) – only JOSM validation fix by removing (stray?) wikipedia:ar tag. Country borders – Osmose validation (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?source... commented 2026-03-01 10:12:44 UTC by Aurimas Fišeras ♦50 |
| 179146540 (Comments: 2) | Michi_07 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, alles klar, vielen Dank! Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-01 10:07:23 UTC by Michi_07 ♦6 |
| 179200445 (Comments: 6) | Oxoid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Deze tekst hoorde er niet bij plakken in ID. Tip; linker Alt toets vasthouden en ID plakt niet :) commented 2026-03-01 10:05:54 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179146469 (Comments: 2) | Michi_07 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, ich habe dort eine Position leicht angepasst. Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung! Viele Grüße und einen schönen Tag noch commented 2026-03-01 10:04:54 UTC by Michi_07 ♦6 |
| 179109414 (Comments: 1) | PowerMapper77 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This looks like an undiscussed import and the source is not accessible without log in. Please explain. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179109414 commented 2026-03-01 10:04:20 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 179147904 (Comments: 2) | Michi_07 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, ich war vor einigen Tagen dort vor Ort, die Hausnummern habe ich leider nicht gesehen, aber die Häuser an der westlichen Seite sind fertig, die beiden auf der östlichen Seite sind noch in Bau. Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-01 10:02:05 UTC by Michi_07 ♦6 |
 | 173585190 (Comments: 5) | KingVik (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello zstadler, Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to fix that yet because I’ve been a bit busy. I am currently leading the Africa Map Cup due I’ve added this task to my to‑do list. If you can go ahead and fix it, that would be... commented 2026-03-01 10:01:03 UTC by KingVik ♦21 |
 | 179200712 (Comments: 1) | Frontline Express (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-01 09:54:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179197792 (Comments: 1) | camelino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-01 09:50:56 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179167947 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please use `*:yue-Latn=` for romanization without commonly recognized and used status, not `*:en=` commented 2026-03-01 09:42:29 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 178851071 (Comments: 2) | MihaelIvanjek (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi! Thank you for pointing this out - it seems I wrote "conditional" instead of "articulated" accidentally. Here's the fix: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179200073 commented 2026-03-01 09:33:03 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦23 |
| 178856776 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 116) | Hi, what does 'phv' mean? This looks like a spelling mistake. commented 2026-03-01 09:07:34 UTC by mueschel ♦6,938 |
| 179196155 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please don't undisussed bulk change from `old_name=` to other `*name=` , and accuse others of vandalisms. You are only accusing yourself together. Use OpenHistoricalMap. commented 2026-03-01 09:06:39 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 179090666 (Comments: 3) | Ogmios (Discussed changesets: 44) | Mit changeset/179147875 sind nun die Punkte node/13606354050 und node/13606354051 an genau der gleichen Position wie node/13602277571 erzeugt worden. 1. Damit liegen drei Punkte exakt übereinander. 2. Der Ernst-August-Stollen hat d... commented 2026-03-01 09:05:34 UTC by Hb- ♦339 |
| 179196073 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 11) | There's no `=peak` if it has become flattened with the surroundings entirely. Only `place=locality` , and it should be on OpenHistoricalMap instead. commented 2026-03-01 09:05:14 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 166159127 (Comments: 4) | Patchi (Discussed changesets: 37) | Bonjour Enzo, Pour le remplacement de bicycle=designated par mtb=designated je suis beaucoup plus réservé. Tout d'abord le MTB est un sous groupe de bicycle, ceci qui veut dire que si bicycle=yes et bien mtb=yes (c&#... commented 2026-03-01 09:01:53 UTC by Patchi ♦144 |
| 179199146 (Comments: 4) | thomas930 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Did you check whether others have politely commented on you already? You will see how well your report do for yourself. commented 2026-03-01 09:00:48 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 179197177 (Comments: 2) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 135) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179199146 Please read your own changesets if you know how to comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179184501 commented 2026-03-01 08:59:34 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 178945241 (Comments: 1) | Trayo612 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Trayo612, du hast hier als einzige Änderung die Rufnummer vom internationalen zum nationalen Format geändert. Das ist nicht richtig. Rufnummern bitte immer im Internationalen Format angeben!! Bitte wieder ändern. VG Uwe commented 2026-03-01 08:53:54 UTC by uvi ♦147 |
 | 179196728 (Comments: 1) | Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (Discussed changesets: 15) | jika saluran irigasi, gunakan tag waterway=drain commented 2026-03-01 08:52:27 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
 | 179194320 (Comments: 1) | Kingenious (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kingenious, welcome to OSM. Please use Title Case for names instead of BLOCK LETTERS. commented 2026-03-01 08:52:16 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦139 |
| 179186688 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-03-01 08:29:38 UTC by Comino ♦313 |
| 178605297 (Comments: 18) | Greg_Rose (Discussed changesets: 61) | I'm glad you realise your mistake now. As I mentioned earlier, there are neighbourhoods within these suburbs that are yet to be mapped. A lot of them can be seen as bus stop names. Akin to using street names as bus stop names in other parts ... commented 2026-03-01 08:28:35 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦139 |
| 177668487 (Comments: 1) | Andiw12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Changeset ini saya revert. Mari diskusi dengan komunitas OSM Indonesia mengenai tagging yang sesuai. commented 2026-03-01 07:52:49 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 177633575 (Comments: 2) | Andiw12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Saya harus mengembalikkan hasil edit ini karena tagging yang kurang sesuai, pembuatan relasi yang kurang susuai, dan komentar changeset sebagai "tes peta." commented 2026-03-01 07:47:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179170992 (Comments: 2) | Stalker61 (Discussed changesets: 100) | Привет. Да ничего страшного. Посмотрю конечно. Мне не в тягость. Сегодня закончу восстанавливать Р-243 и гляну. Я вообще в осадок выпал, что ... commented 2026-03-01 07:47:39 UTC by Stalker61 ♦307 |
| 126657337 (Comments: 1) | krsch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, there is no הכרמים street near https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185671687. Can you name it? commented 2026-03-01 07:46:31 UTC by Sanniu ♦626 |
| 177235846 (Comments: 5) | nickvet419 (Discussed changesets: 83) | The neighborhood predates the historic district designation (and the name Asia on Argyle), and a historic district is not really a neighborhood per se. I split https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q138509081 from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2564147 so th... commented 2026-03-01 07:40:34 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦601 |
| 179155058 (Comments: 1) | croche-eraser (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Sorry to say that your changes still seem to cause self-intersection of area outlines. Please see the latest problems here:- https://tinyurl.com/5cej8ev6 I've not made any corrections to those problems. Regards Bernard commented 2026-03-01 07:38:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,105 |
| 150402876 (Comments: 1) | 44Leandro44 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo 44Leandro44, wir finden keinerlei andere Belege für den Namen "St. Leander Pfalz". Könntest du uns sagen, wo du den Namen her hast? Gruss, johsin18 commented 2026-03-01 07:26:30 UTC by johsin18 ♦169 |
| 177048615 (Comments: 2) | brendan77 (Discussed changesets: 9) | No bikes or anything at this station, though, because it's Tesla-only. Just confirmed at Tesla's "Find Us" map, https://www.tesla.com/findus . If you only check Destination Charger > Other EV, this one doesn't show up but ... commented 2026-03-01 07:11:43 UTC by TheNightRider ♦49 |
| 174641965 (Comments: 2) | 7beren (Discussed changesets: 15) | No. It is the same. I will delete the node. commented 2026-03-01 06:58:39 UTC by 7beren ♦5 |
| 161226968 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 49) | You deleted a bunch of buildings in this location (and many places elsewhere) and readded them when it would have been better to just modify the geometry of the existing buildings you deleted. It's good practice to just modify the geometry of ex... commented 2026-03-01 06:58:11 UTC by Frank Peng ♦170 |
 | 162778261 (Comments: 1) | Adrie Sonke (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, all the waterway seem to be drawn in the wrong direction through this area, Waterway are to be drawn in the direction of the waterflow....that is downhill. commented 2026-03-01 06:52:49 UTC by nevw ♦2,156 |
| 179195583 (Comments: 1) | Carrillo Funeral Home - Dallas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-01 06:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 167768961 (Comments: 1) | Cristoffs (Discussed changesets: 138) | Tego budynku nie ma od kilkunastu lat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396156221 Co to za źródło? commented 2026-03-01 05:54:45 UTC by VA00 ♦624 |
 | 178843741 (Comments: 2) | Edithkw (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178975036 https://osm.org/changeset/179103635 commented 2026-03-01 05:33:24 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178842810 (Comments: 2) | Jordamsearle (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195375 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178841044 (Comments: 2) | menageparfait (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195374 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178840028 (Comments: 2) | menageparfait (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178840667 commented 2026-03-01 05:33:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178837422 (Comments: 2) | Strony internetowe Kacper Głodowski (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195373 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178836379 (Comments: 2) | Bloomer Septic Service (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195372 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178835069 (Comments: 2) | 16041631 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195371 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178833693 (Comments: 2) | 16678167 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195369 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178833505 (Comments: 2) | Weaver’s Fresh Food and Drink (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195368 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178833231 (Comments: 2) | Small Engine Service (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195366 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178832785 (Comments: 2) | Lone Maple Feed & Harness (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195365 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:03 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178828914 (Comments: 2) | 19786823 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195364 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-01 05:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 179094505 (Comments: 1) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-03-01 05:23:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179094348 (Comments: 1) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-03-01 05:22:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179093535 (Comments: 1) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-03-01 05:22:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179093362 (Comments: 1) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-03-01 05:22:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179093981 (Comments: 1) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-03-01 05:22:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179093779 (Comments: 1) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-03-01 05:22:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 173349595 (Comments: 10) | BarnaulRomanTV (Discussed changesets: 6) | Вы прикалываетесь? На ваших фото нет ни намёка на офис агенства. Нет ни вывески, ни графика, ни офиса, ничего. На карту OSM мы не вносим вирту... commented 2026-03-01 05:22:26 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,279 |
| 179077517 (Comments: 1) | krajnikOSP (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-03-01 05:12:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179078195 (Comments: 1) | Wash Pan - Dawid Miśkiewicz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-03-01 05:12:33 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179194279 (Comments: 1) | Vinicius Moraes (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert of 179098308 commented 2026-03-01 03:55:32 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
 | 179002714 (Comments: 1) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 19) | I noticed you changed the Singapore-Indonesia border back to its previous state. Since we discussed this in changeset/175054892, I wanted to ensure we're on the same page. My recent edit (changeset/175293862 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?chang... commented 2026-03-01 03:43:05 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179100276 (Comments: 1) | the100daysummer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 179099292 commented 2026-03-01 03:40:40 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179193829 (Comments: 1) | Higashimado (Discussed changesets: 9) | In this changeset I removed many alt_name tags that weren’t being used as true alternate names: 1. For Chinese alt_name values, these tags should represent names written in different characters, not simply the same name without generic n... commented 2026-03-01 03:16:09 UTC by Higashimado ♦15 |
 | 179108306 (Comments: 1) | Rancho:El Tres De Oro⁷⁷⁷ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:179193548 commented 2026-03-01 03:12:12 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178313852 (Comments: 1) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Similarly, these would be better as driveways than generic service roads commented 2026-03-01 02:41:24 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦153 |
| 163731883 (Comments: 1) | ZF GU (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您将名称修改为了“车辆馆” 那请问“文法学院 外语学院”去哪了呢 commented 2026-03-01 02:36:18 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 179060567 (Comments: 1) | GIS MCC (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hiya, layer=1 on the garage is wrong, it should be drawn as to not overlap with the house commented 2026-03-01 02:35:42 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦153 |
| 179149991 (Comments: 1) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hiya - this would be better marked as a driveway commented 2026-03-01 02:32:07 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦153 |
| 179142643 (Comments: 1) | NaoiseMcG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 179075245 commented 2026-03-01 02:23:32 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179152350 (Comments: 1) | BenWhere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Your edit looks good. I'll send you some info on OSM in a message. I am currious why the tag man_made=pier was removed from the north east most dock? It looks like part of a pier. --- Publish... commented 2026-03-01 01:56:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 179192190 (Comments: 1) | eneskaplanavtr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-01 00:57:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178785832 (Comments: 4) | Vinicius Moraes (Discussed changesets: 6) | Curitiba tem o anel viário em torno do Centro, com a função de desviar os deslocamentos entre uma região e outra da região central - então realmente o objetivo é jogar quem vem de Santa Felicidade para... commented 2026-03-01 00:46:13 UTC by Vinicius Moraes ♦4 |
 | 179190823 (Comments: 1) | supsup (Discussed changesets: 10) | Sorry for the completely nonsensical comment on teh changeset - I hit enter in JOSM by mistake and a previous changeset comment from the other side of the world applied. I had a reminder to revisit this area, because when I was there two years a... commented 2026-02-28 23:40:47 UTC by supsup ♦11 |
| 179190730 (Comments: 1) | Arthzin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 23:36:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178978346 (Comments: 1) | Lungo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Guten Tag, der Pfad existiert und darf deshalb nicht gelöscht werden ("on the ground"-Regel), siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F commented 2026-02-28 23:32:08 UTC by whb ♦651 |
| 179144643 (Comments: 1) | Moepmoep (Discussed changesets: 13) | Die neue Position des Knotens (Wörtelstraße 34) und die eingetragene Adresse (Friedrichstraße 53) passen nicht zusammen. commented 2026-02-28 23:22:51 UTC by george1201 ♦282 |
| 176387530 (Comments: 6) | Aigars_S (Discussed changesets: 1) | Burvīgi - un aicinām arī pievienoties OpenStreetMap Latvijas kopienas čatam https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/ :) commented 2026-02-28 23:14:41 UTC by richlv ♦422 |
| 158726897 (Comments: 1) | karayama (Discussed changesets: 8) | 哥我建议你别画军区之类的敏感内容 commented 2026-02-28 23:11:08 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 97693462 (Comments: 2) | Clem0908 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonjour, merci pour cette précision :) Il me semble ne pas avoir suivi l'évolution de ces tags, d'où l'erreur commented 2026-02-28 22:57:38 UTC by Clem0908 ♦15 |
 | 139103623 (Comments: 1) | gwadagp971 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, je trouve curieux l'ajout d'une aide de camping car ici car il n'y a aucune signalisation en ce sens. S'il est vrai que le parking peut être un endroit intéressant avec la douche/robinet, les poubelles, carbe... commented 2026-02-28 22:54:34 UTC by Niquarl ♦6 |
| 179188538 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 356) | Dag A67-A67, Over ONLY & SONS: Liguster 202 is het managementkantoor van de Mall. Ook vaak gebruikt als contactadres voor toekomstige / kleine / tijdelijke winkels. In het echt zit Only and Sons op Jasmijn 20. Ik heb jouw extra gegevens... commented 2026-02-28 22:47:51 UTC by jb54osm ♦204 |
 | 175602552 (Comments: 1) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 13) | Deleted relation 19927055 - 2 members both inners. commented 2026-02-28 22:44:09 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,748 |
| 147073603 (Comments: 1) | Jack the Ripper (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi! This changeset changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9130493 from "maxspeed=30 mph" to "maxspeed=3025 mph", which I'm assuming is some sort of typo? Seems like it'd be hard to get up to that speed on that little ... commented 2026-02-28 22:28:06 UTC by PeterCooperJr ♦17 |
| 32741250 (Comments: 3) | flaimo (Discussed changesets: 4) | After a year, this time looking at Aesculus hippocastanus trees for my nerdy tree statistics: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ivanbranco&oldid=2958848 I noticed this tree: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3658154622... commented 2026-02-28 22:17:28 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,837 |
| 179173908 (Comments: 1) | HelloCleveland (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and thanks for editing OSM! Just in this case this is not correct. "Park" in OSM is considered as public area with maintained greenery and used for leisure activities. You can read more about the description here: https://wiki.open... commented 2026-02-28 22:00:32 UTC by Mashin ♦597 |
| 158350558 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 202) | Cześć, czy bocznica jeszcze istnieje? Przy LK66 można zauważyć stosy starych podkładów. commented 2026-02-28 21:56:16 UTC by Wally_PL ♦1 |
| 179187360 (Comments: 6) | Bolbuyk (Discussed changesets: 16) | Inderdaad... Zag het, maar ik kijk meer algemeen. Die tags stonden er al op. Zodra je dan ergens aan zit staat jouw naam erop. Die tags zijn echter veel ouder zie ik nu. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179187360 Wellic... commented 2026-02-28 21:48:51 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 166668234 (Comments: 1) | Cyril5C (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Cyril5C, just curious, what happened to this tree? was mapped as tree, then tree_stump, then tree again. But the height and circumference value remained the same (they should be changed if a new tree was planted). Also, the circum... commented 2026-02-28 21:42:35 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,837 |
| 119421415 (Comments: 3) | Chemnitzer13 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Sorry, that is no explanation. There is no rule the tags need to be on a node, not an area. See e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations#Overview . commented 2026-02-28 21:35:32 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,803 |
| 169362883 (Comments: 1) | porcelainkatana (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset removed the building tag from these buildings. I've fixed the tagging such that the military areas have been specified by the naval base and military base areas and reverted the buildings to building:yes commented 2026-02-28 21:26:52 UTC by Shrinks99 ♦17 |
| 162004840 (Comments: 8) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 267) | Wie gesagt, es geht um die innenliegenden, zusätzlichen Eckpunkte, siehe changeset/162004840#c1560236 commented 2026-02-28 21:18:12 UTC by Hb- ♦339 |
| 179040107 (Comments: 4) | m_p_13 (Discussed changesets: 159) | Okej, to ma sens! Myślałem, że to jakaś oficjalna nazwa. Jak tak to rzeczywiście mniejsza. commented 2026-02-28 21:16:29 UTC by Szkodnix ♦1 |
 | 179187508 (Comments: 1) | MadelineMaddie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-28 21:15:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179092301 (Comments: 1) | Bootlace1049 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hoi Bootlace, Volgens mij is dit pad zelfs niet meer in gebruik. Ik was er vandaag en kon het niet terug vinden. Overigens keek ik hier omdat ik het vlonderpad ook goed wilde leggen, maar dat heb jij al gedaan. commented 2026-02-28 21:11:51 UTC by Bolbuyk ♦11 |
| 179175001 (Comments: 1) | albigdd (Discussed changesets: 6) | Die Gebäude sind noch in allen aktuellen Luftbildern erkennbar. Damit niemand die ohne Ortskenntnis übers Luftbild einträgt, sollten solche abgerissenen Gebäude stattdessen für einige Jahre mit dem "demolished:" pre... commented 2026-02-28 21:10:12 UTC by Tatfahren ♦327 |
| 177480560 (Comments: 1) | chrizy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Salut chrizzy, Juste pour info, bicycle=designated n'est pas conseillé sur la voirie. Il s'agit d'une clé implicite. Je fais un peu de ménage dans le coin. A bientot, Enzo commented 2026-02-28 21:10:06 UTC by Nzau ♦150 |
| 179081397 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 6) | The node was created on accident so it has since been deleted in another changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179187284 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-28 21:06:24 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦23 |
| 169835822 (Comments: 1) | Cleoramx1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut Cleoramx1, Je vois que tu as ajouté pas mal d'infos sur différents chemins agricoles (highway=track). Le souci c'est que certains tags ne sont pas obligatoires, et déjà implicites. Par exem... commented 2026-02-28 21:04:02 UTC by Nzau ♦150 |
| 179049284 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 6) | The node was created on accident so it has since been deleted in another changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179187031 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-28 20:59:20 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦23 |
| 179186032 (Comments: 1) | Advocatenkantoor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag A kantoor, Svp geen name=Advocatenkantoor Burgum laadpaal Beter operator=.... gebruiken. De hoofdtag is amenity=charging_station Mvg eggie commented 2026-02-28 20:46:11 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 170606990 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 28) | Salut pierre_geovelo, Pas sur non plus de cette contribution :/ J'ai fait quelques modifications. Au plaisir d'en discuter, Enzo commented 2026-02-28 20:46:03 UTC by Nzau ♦150 |
| 179183821 (Comments: 1) | NSBOX (Discussed changesets: 2) | Согласно правилам сообщества, тэги name (стандарнтый name, не name:xx) должны заполняться на бел. языке. Насколько я понимаю, это относится и к ос... commented 2026-02-28 20:45:52 UTC by HantDX ♦50 |
| 179186585 (Comments: 1) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 166) | *EDIT. Istnieje, źle spojrzałem, ale i tak duplikuje ten nadany na budynku. commented 2026-02-28 20:45:40 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,217 |
| 171320013 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 28) | Salut pierre_geovelo, Je ne comprends pas trop ta modif ? J'ai justement enlevé le bicycle=yes parce qu'il n'a rien à faire là (accès implicite). Sinon on peut vite se retrouver à mettre... commented 2026-02-28 20:41:14 UTC by Nzau ♦150 |
| 179167142 (Comments: 1) | OSM-user-472946 (Discussed changesets: 5) | review_requested \tyes Dag OSM-user-472946, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode. MVG, eggie commented 2026-02-28 20:21:29 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
 | 179173972 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmap666777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Se folosesc diacritice obligatoriu. Setul de imagini Bing este mai vechi de 10 ani. Foloseste ESRI Standard sau Mapbox. commented 2026-02-28 20:19:16 UTC by rarad74 ♦427 |
| 179177838 (Comments: 1) | abiding-wok (Discussed changesets: 2) | review_requested \tyes Lijkt me oke zo, MVG eggie commented 2026-02-28 20:18:33 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179185310 (Comments: 1) | Advocatenkantoor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-28 20:15:11 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 177027356 (Comments: 1) | Martin K (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't forget to add the "access = no" tag if it's still not open commented 2026-02-28 20:12:58 UTC by GuyFrom2007 ♦20 |
| 179185482 (Comments: 2) | captain_slow (Discussed changesets: 51) | Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5185420 commented 2026-02-28 20:12:48 UTC by captain_slow ♦76 |
| 178791936 (Comments: 7) | Koreller (Discussed changesets: 21) | Oups, tu as raison, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:location n'a pas green, du coup quand j'ai lu green, j'ai pensé à une couleur. commented 2026-02-28 20:11:46 UTC by trial ♦1,097 |
 | 179184972 (Comments: 1) | NunoCaldeira (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello, Thank you for adding all those detials! Please note that natural=tree can only be used on the trees themselves, not on the area that the tree is standing on. I have fixed this already, so don't worry. Thanks and happy mapping! commented 2026-02-28 20:08:33 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦53 |
| 177327772 (Comments: 3) | Ryu-uyR (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't believe there is a feature; just select and drag the nodes to the right location. Nodes can be added, buy double clicking on the way then dragged to match the image. I agree that it requires more work, but it save the history of the obje... commented 2026-02-28 20:02:38 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 179105950 (Comments: 4) | Jonaes (Discussed changesets: 12) | Danke! commented 2026-02-28 19:46:25 UTC by burrscurr ♦94 |
| 179183439 (Comments: 3) | Cybermanx (Discussed changesets: 7) | top, grazie mille farò prossimamente, intanto ho dato luce al centro che mi dava fastidio lasciare incompleto l'obiettivo che mi ero fissato commented 2026-02-28 19:27:39 UTC by Cybermanx ♦10 |
 | 178771761 (Comments: 3) | Jacci_hu (Discussed changesets: 7) | I think we fixed most of the issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179183947 commented 2026-02-28 19:21:49 UTC by qstep ♦45 |
| 153569226 (Comments: 2) | artos42 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Nie ma śladów commented 2026-02-28 19:21:28 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦854 |
| 178144194 (Comments: 3) | Jacob Axford (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the quick reply. If the footpath no longer physically exists then deleting it was the right thing to do. Mentioning the physical removal of the footpath and change of ues from pub to house in the original changeset description wo... commented 2026-02-28 19:20:23 UTC by tomhukins ♦261 |
| 179170539 (Comments: 5) | JannisOSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nee.. dat is de cache van je scherm. Er staat nu helemaal geen naam meer op het gebouw. Landal Gulpen staat al op het terrein. Dat is voldoende. Een paar keer ctrl-f5 toetsen. Groet, eggie commented 2026-02-28 19:19:38 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 118103458 (Comments: 1) | Strangeaeons (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5185020 Jakie jest źródło tych nazw? Dębowa - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9554663658 to na pewno nie duplikat tego: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9487470355 ? commented 2026-02-28 19:08:05 UTC by kubahahaha ♦432 |
| 179053710 (Comments: 1) | zoomolgabis (Discussed changesets: 1) | If they still exist they're perfectly valid for mapping. commented 2026-02-28 19:04:06 UTC by InsertUser ♦476 |
 | 178976834 (Comments: 1) | gnkgia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Do you have a source for the prison camp boundaries and the specific sub-facilities? I'm not questioning the existence of the camp or its general location, however there doesn't seem to be any physical barriers along the boundary you drew. ... commented 2026-02-28 18:46:12 UTC by theman7777 ♦4 |
| 179182260 (Comments: 1) | mafklapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag MK, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Spatie verwijderd uit postcode. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-28 18:33:14 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 172295464 (Comments: 1) | dragosandreipirghie (Discussed changesets: 6) | ref=`71 ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431986802 commented 2026-02-28 18:26:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
 | 178276740 (Comments: 2) | 3Loader3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi. Well, it's a narrow old stone bridge that was bypassed many many years ago. As far as I could see it was completely overgrown at one end but it was possible to squeeze onto it, although it goes nowhere. Since then the local community have do... commented 2026-02-28 18:10:38 UTC by 3Loader3 ♦2 |
| 14264466 (Comments: 2) | Carsten Güse (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Uwe, anhand meiner GPX-Tracks in Altendorf konnte ich erkennen, dass ich da nicht direkt vor Ort war im Sandweg. Ich habe den Fußweg also nur aus Luftbildern gemappt. Wenn du vor Ort warst kannst du das wesentlich besser abschätzen. ... commented 2026-02-28 18:08:18 UTC by Carsten Güse ♦5 |
| 179015410 (Comments: 3) | alessandrocarmeli (Discussed changesets: 140) | Dopo il tuo intervento, la relation 2638882 era rotta, ho dovuto aggiungere la way 1482733696, vedi la history: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xjk4ura5nA8oW5vNN40HMLTTKOgKkqhC&usp=drive_fs commented 2026-02-28 18:08:00 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦149 |
| 178919592 (Comments: 2) | Norbert Banhalmi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179181056 commented 2026-02-28 18:01:37 UTC by qstep ♦45 |
| 178919460 (Comments: 2) | Norbert Banhalmi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en! Szerkesztésedben az épület házszámára raktad a vállalkozásod. Átraktam saját POI-ra mind itt, mind Bécsben, valamint a reklám jelle... commented 2026-02-28 18:00:16 UTC by qstep ♦45 |
| 179146933 (Comments: 2) | Aroru (Discussed changesets: 5) | Saya kena rate limit. Semua objek yang ingin saya kembalikan masih di pc saya. Rolllback ditunda dulu. commented 2026-02-28 17:51:40 UTC by Aroru ♦4 |
| 178813058 (Comments: 3) | Parowiec Świecący (Discussed changesets: 5) | Przyroda nie lubi pustki, więc może za jakiś czas otworzy się tam inna stacja paliw pod inną marką. A jak się nie otworzy i wyburzą budynki, to będzie można skasować. Oznaczanie niedawno zamkniętego sklepu lub innego obiektu prefiksem ... commented 2026-02-28 17:47:36 UTC by maro21 ♦823 |
| 168556068 (Comments: 2) | N1m0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! It's kind of tricky to define but it's a real shop. You can see some items of their website: https://arcaneumshop.com/shop commented 2026-02-28 17:46:32 UTC by N1m0 ♦1 |
| 179179416 (Comments: 1) | BrookeP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi - these highways are best classified as driveways. The wiki asks that minor roads are not residential. commented 2026-02-28 17:39:28 UTC by no details provided here ♦30 |
| 178810607 (Comments: 2) | TSWOB (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178811623 commented 2026-02-28 17:33:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178811186 (Comments: 2) | TSWOB (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178811623 commented 2026-02-28 17:33:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178828745 (Comments: 2) | 500373774 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180228 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178827015 (Comments: 2) | Rock Run Events (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180226 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178824627 (Comments: 2) | กุ้งเต้นกุ้งทอด (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180224 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178819698 (Comments: 2) | Jérôme Nivard (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180220 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178822200 (Comments: 2) | 500384268 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180222 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178815246 (Comments: 2) | jw2clean (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178891090 commented 2026-02-28 17:33:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178815436 (Comments: 2) | maya business club (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180219 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178814391 (Comments: 2) | davconstructionllc (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178828710 commented 2026-02-28 17:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178812241 (Comments: 2) | Screen Enclosures by Colonial Construction (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180215 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178806290 (Comments: 2) | advancedawnings (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180208 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178809634 (Comments: 2) | GrungyGirl (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180209 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178811239 (Comments: 2) | Hawker Group - Arthur Leichner (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180210 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178804035 (Comments: 2) | Charlotte Ann Rhee MD (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180206 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-28 17:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178803587 (Comments: 2) | johntottenlaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178891068 commented 2026-02-28 17:33:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178888851 (Comments: 1) | jemm (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi, it's not common to prefix the gtfs codes with a country code. Usually it is added at the end, mostly combined with a region of operator information. See e.g. this list of tags that are used in other places: https://taginfo.openstree... commented 2026-02-28 17:31:48 UTC by mueschel ♦6,938 |
| 159248473 (Comments: 10) | DabMK (Discussed changesets: 27) | I removed the references to military and aeronautical use. At present, there is no indication of this anymore, except for a sign stating that the area is state-owned and prohibiting access to motor vehicles. I restored it to natural=grassland,... commented 2026-02-28 17:30:36 UTC by GCerretani ♦8 |
| 177773666 (Comments: 1) | sanjanasharma_lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | Referencing ‘Town Line’: There is no evidence this is an officially named road. The sign marks the town boundary, not a street name. Please avoid adding or inventing names that are not supported by survey or authoritative data. commented 2026-02-28 17:30:10 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦138 |
| 179179936 (Comments: 1) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 85) | There is no evidence this is an officially named road. The sign marks the town boundary, not a street name. Please avoid adding or inventing names that are not supported by survey or authoritative data. commented 2026-02-28 17:29:25 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦138 |
| 179057192 (Comments: 3) | G4rden3r (Discussed changesets: 24) | Okay, dankeschön :) commented 2026-02-28 17:27:07 UTC by kadiwa ♦70 |
| 173724012 (Comments: 3) | perlus5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, regreso sobre este tema. ¿Podrías decirme algo al respecto? Saludos commented 2026-02-28 17:02:55 UTC by msevilla00 ♦145 |
| 179173378 (Comments: 2) | mfortini (Discussed changesets: 2) | Io vedo ancora un nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13607352976#map=19/44.845237/11.628143 commented 2026-02-28 16:53:10 UTC by mfortini ♦2 |
| 179178584 (Comments: 1) | tyfi (Discussed changesets: 422) | Previously, the adjacency was approximate, and some overlap was apparent. This was less semantically correct. commented 2026-02-28 16:51:51 UTC by tyfi ♦438 |
| 179146474 (Comments: 1) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 172) | Thank you for this change! commented 2026-02-28 16:51:22 UTC by roptat ♦101 |
| 179155849 (Comments: 2) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Np commented 2026-02-28 16:33:37 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦7 |
| 179177416 (Comments: 1) | kabirhossain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 16:27:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178055874 (Comments: 1) | sjhuda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your helpful work improving the map. Might https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:opening%20hours=closed?uselang=en-GB make more sense than the "opening_hours=off" here? commented 2026-02-28 16:26:37 UTC by tomhukins ♦261 |
| 41029636 (Comments: 1) | Patxirrindulari (Discussed changesets: 6) | Die Pfade way/433150298 und way/433160971 zum 'Traunspitzl' sind mit access:no eingetragen. Gibt es dafür einen Grund oder war das ein Versehen? Grüße kre777 commented 2026-02-28 16:23:11 UTC by kre777 ♦16 |
| 177630756 (Comments: 2) | landfahrer (Discussed changesets: 45) | Je viens de finir, je te laisse regarder et modifier si tu l'estimes en fonction de la remarque suivante : pour 3 îles dans le lit de la rivière, j'ai créer une relation river avec intermittent=yes, attribut qui pourr... commented 2026-02-28 16:02:33 UTC by Yunan973 ♦91 |
| 178818200 (Comments: 1) | R-MEDIA (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179176152 Proszę o dodanie obiektu w formie OSOBNEGO punktu commented 2026-02-28 15:54:57 UTC by bartgron ♦541 |
| 179081790 (Comments: 1) | R-MEDIA (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179176104 Proszę o dodanie obiektu zgodnie z zasadami OSM, czyli jako osobny punkt, ponieważ obiekt nie zajmuje całego budynku. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-02-28 15:53:44 UTC by bartgron ♦541 |
| 179081736 (Comments: 2) | R-MEDIA (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179176010 Pozdrawiam commented 2026-02-28 15:50:45 UTC by bartgron ♦541 |
| 179166088 (Comments: 1) | Lyym (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for updating this water tap - it doesn't seem to be functioning, though. Pressing the button didn't dispense any water when I checked earlier today. commented 2026-02-28 15:46:17 UTC by jayaddison ♦3 |
| 179171916 (Comments: 2) | Mehmet Talha Gümüş (Discussed changesets: 1) | In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks agai... commented 2026-02-28 15:33:41 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179175072 (Comments: 1) | June Thio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 15:27:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179174887 (Comments: 1) | June Thio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 15:24:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179123762 (Comments: 1) | R-MEDIA (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zmiana do wycofania. Jeżeli na ternie budynku znajduje się jakiś klub sportowy, to należy go dodać jako nowy punkt w miejscu, gdzie faktycznie się znajduje, a nie nadawać nazwę punktu całemu budynkowi. commented 2026-02-28 15:23:26 UTC by cytryn ♦135 |
| 179101518 (Comments: 2) | reCo2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | nein, hat sich nichts geändert. Habe das Duplikat entfernt commented 2026-02-28 15:11:35 UTC by Luzandro ♦984 |
| 178760073 (Comments: 7) | Tacsipacsi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ezek szerint a tisztelt városatyák nem ismerik a helyesírást. ☹ Ettől még persze az OSM-nek azt kell követnie, ahogy ők leírták, köszönöm a korrekciót! (A Wikipédi... commented 2026-02-28 15:09:57 UTC by Tacsipacsi ♦2 |
| 179174246 (Comments: 1) | June Thio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 15:09:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 173900706 (Comments: 4) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 356) | Nouja, als het straks (bijna) klaar is (de tijdelijke situatie) nog maar eens kijken dan. commented 2026-02-28 14:52:14 UTC by IIVQ ♦144 |
| 179173368 (Comments: 1) | selinnaslnnn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-28 14:45:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 174755384 (Comments: 1) | jonboeke (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi jonboeke, you used some unusual values for amenity=* and shop=* here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57845290 Do I understand it right, that there are a restaurant and a hairdresser in that building? commented 2026-02-28 14:32:36 UTC by os-emmer ♦351 |
 | 179156455 (Comments: 2) | AlmacenBellaVista (Discussed changesets: 3) | El nombre en "addr:street" tendria que corresponderse con el "name" en la calle. Sino, es indicativo de que alguno de los dos esta incorrecto. commented 2026-02-28 14:31:02 UTC by muralito ♦2,122 |
 | 179060068 (Comments: 2) | Alvarado2510 (Discussed changesets: 316) | Saludos y buen día, estoy cambiando algunos segemntonde carretera a Path, basándome en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath , considero que es el más apropiado para informar que estos caminos están en co... commented 2026-02-28 14:30:22 UTC by Alvarado2510 ♦129 |
 | 178325826 (Comments: 1) | HoangQuanHDFPV (Discussed changesets: 10) | một đoạn đầu là ngõ 19 nguyễn văn lộc là đúng rồi, tôi không hiểu vì sao bạn lại xóa đi commented 2026-02-28 14:29:07 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦36 |
| 178838309 (Comments: 1) | amituofo948 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper. In general, you mapped correctly a lot of buildings; however, quite many buildings are mapped as a plot with the building on it. Just map the buildings. Not the yard. And don't combi... commented 2026-02-28 14:29:07 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179156462 (Comments: 1) | AlmacenBellaVista (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Los telefonos para que tengan utilidad 100% tienen que escibirse en el formato internacional. "+598 93 770 354" vendria a ser en este caso. commented 2026-02-28 14:26:22 UTC by muralito ♦2,122 |
| 179156180 (Comments: 2) | Eduardo17172 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ruta 41* commented 2026-02-28 14:25:28 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦12 |
| 178995107 (Comments: 3) | Fjana (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello, This really doesn't make sense as a "proposed" feature. See the caveats on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed for more details about what sort of "proposed" things make sense in OSM. I'd sugge... commented 2026-02-28 14:22:21 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,685 |
| 179168008 (Comments: 1) | Godfred_uew (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Godfred_uew, it seems you enjoy using UPPER CASE a lot, but note that this is against OSM convention. You can look everywhere else on the map and notice that you are the only one doing that. The name=* tag should always be in the title case... commented 2026-02-28 14:06:13 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦139 |
| 179172010 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 591) | miało być: podjazd commented 2026-02-28 14:04:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 127721300 (Comments: 2) | kartler175 (Discussed changesets: 139) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5184929 commented 2026-02-28 13:58:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 179170454 (Comments: 1) | Romee Hoeksma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Romee.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-28 13:48:13 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179164484 (Comments: 1) | Cogwheel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-28 13:38:50 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 175338146 (Comments: 1) | Asror Tajriba (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other or other features. Check the instructions under Buildings: 'Try to avoid the overlapped building and glued to each other.' Best regards commented 2026-02-28 13:37:16 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179168029 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 128) | Rendering can abuse and add `=earth_bank` + `anthropogenic=yes` commented 2026-02-28 13:35:50 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 179168373 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 128) | Good catch. Improved / fixed with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179170787 commented 2026-02-28 13:30:30 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦119 |
| 179124098 (Comments: 1) | NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential for this instead. I have update and simplified most of the ways you have added here as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway. commented 2026-02-28 13:25:11 UTC by Enock4seth ♦610 |
| 178708253 (Comments: 1) | ymkwmo (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-02-28 13:17:20 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179165530 (Comments: 1) | NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, is TL an abbreviation? commented 2026-02-28 13:13:47 UTC by Enock4seth ♦610 |
| 147264332 (Comments: 3) | Sforzando9500 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for your understanding. Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179170266 commented 2026-02-28 13:13:08 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,764 |
| 179126494 (Comments: 1) | NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF, thanks for mapping and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please STOP using Bing Maps Aerial imagery for adding new data in this area. Bing is very out-of-date. Kindly use Esri World Imagery or Mapbox Satellite which are much newer ... commented 2026-02-28 13:10:49 UTC by Enock4seth ♦610 |
| 76871653 (Comments: 3) | Verkehrskarte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cheers! It doesn't seem to be there any more, or present in current Translink datasets (although I do see it on a much older dataset on the OSNI site). Seems that it is no longer in use. commented 2026-02-28 13:07:42 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦75 |
| 177209744 (Comments: 1) | tartiflettedunet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Qu'est-ce qui vous fait dire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487057851 est privé? je n'y ai jamais vu aucun panneau ni colture. commented 2026-02-28 13:07:27 UTC by NikoJorj ♦13 |
| 169471077 (Comments: 3) | u1905 (Discussed changesets: 8) | to skasowałem tym razem ja commented 2026-02-28 12:58:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 167855536 (Comments: 2) | kenken234 (Discussed changesets: 23) | IIRC, this was used as GRC boundary. Since there's no relation attached to the way and there exist an updated one relation/11033362; I think it's safe to remove it. commented 2026-02-28 12:49:21 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179159684 (Comments: 2) | KlausG (Discussed changesets: 50) | Ja, stimmt, ich habe hier versehentlich noch das gleiche Luftbild angegeben, dass ich mit den Änderungen weiter südlich genutzt hatte..., wenn sich der Kommentar darauf bezieht... commented 2026-02-28 12:31:32 UTC by KlausG ♦18 |
| 178232865 (Comments: 2) | RJ-Gouda (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Tjuro, Ik had mij niet gerealiseerd dat monument een andere betekenis heeft in OpenStreetMap. Historic=yes is dan de juiste tag. Met vriendelijke groet RJ commented 2026-02-28 12:29:31 UTC by RJ-Gouda ♦3 |
| 179168438 (Comments: 1) | centralvafamilydentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 12:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178758499 (Comments: 3) | sparnonien (Discussed changesets: 2) | pour information voici une utilisation à Gas addr:country=FR addr:housenumber=28 addr:street=Rue Jean Moulin amenity=animal_boarding animal_boarding=dog;cat contact:facebook=https://www.facebook.com/people/La-maison-de-L... commented 2026-02-28 12:23:57 UTC by sparnonien ♦2 |
| 177492115 (Comments: 1) | SMSgeo (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-02-28 12:02:09 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 167686466 (Comments: 7) | Cristoffs (Discussed changesets: 138) | https://github.com/praszuk/josm-plbuildings-plugin/issues/5 commented 2026-02-28 11:54:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 179167112 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 52) | Actually, I made 222 changes. Sorry! commented 2026-02-28 11:42:56 UTC by Tewuzij ♦29 |
| 179166806 (Comments: 1) | geomaniX (Discussed changesets: 17) | Da hat GoMap die Änderungen einfach hochgelu, bevor ich den Änderungssatzkommentar fertig hatte. Es sollte eigentlich heißen: "Geschäft wg. Schließung am 31.03.2026 mit Schließungsnote versehen; Tagging der La... commented 2026-02-28 11:42:26 UTC by geomaniX ♦53 |
 | 179164832 (Comments: 8) | Manos Roudas (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2026-02-28 11:41:23 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179118825 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 28) | Bonjour, cet arret de bus n'existe pas sur le terrain. Merci de ne pas ajouter aveuglement des POI non vérifés sur le terrain. Vous auriez au moins dû réaliser que l'arrêt sur ce côté de ... commented 2026-02-28 11:38:43 UTC by yxoc ♦50 |
| 179101671 (Comments: 1) | LOL_flor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. bitte wirf einen Blick ins Wiki, wie Tiergehege üblicherweise getagged werden - oder vergleiche auch mit anderen Zoos. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dzoo Generell müssen Dinge... commented 2026-02-28 11:35:15 UTC by mueschel ♦6,938 |
| 179157684 (Comments: 7) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 80) | Thanks for taking the time, but what exactly is the spam? We are a company that does private boat tours with skipper and crew to the islands. And the truth is that we do that on luxury crafts, which I removed so none feels offended. What else should ... commented 2026-02-28 11:31:40 UTC by Manos Roudas ♦2 |
| 171190049 (Comments: 1) | XianMag (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Xian, la quota delle cime dovrebbe essere inserita all'interno del tag ele=* e non su name=* commented 2026-02-28 11:24:15 UTC by matteobott ♦9 |
| 150410698 (Comments: 3) | HubMiner (Discussed changesets: 49) | Would you be fine with shop=storage_solutions_for_garages ? Avoids confusing with shop=storage_rental Maybe office=company would be viable? It seems they are contracted to do jobs, rather than operating shop where one walks in and buys furnitu... commented 2026-02-28 11:11:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
 | 179039656 (Comments: 1) | QDARK0218 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179165966 commented 2026-02-28 11:05:55 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 176745186 (Comments: 1) | Safrano (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Why do you tag roads in a residential area as service roads? This is what the OSM highway wiki Indonesia says: highway \tservice \tway \tAccess roads in parking lots and around commercial buildings, industrial ... commented 2026-02-28 11:04:28 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 162959368 (Comments: 3) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 333) | Nein, sind sie nicht! Beim Bearbeiten von Grenzen und in Vorbereitung/Nachbereitung von Ersetzen von Geometrien ist das zwingend erforderlich zum einen wegen Filtermöglichkeit und um nach der Bearbeitung kein taglose Linien zu hinterlassen die m... commented 2026-02-28 11:01:47 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,129 |
| 179061704 (Comments: 1) | matimati1213 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:179165683 commented 2026-02-28 10:58:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 116041211 (Comments: 2) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 103) | I apologize, but this is a four-year-old edit based on old screenshots, and others edited it after me. I really don't know what the specific error is. commented 2026-02-28 10:56:01 UTC by HaPe-CZ ♦105 |
| 178932368 (Comments: 2) | ordinatous (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour je n'avais pas vu le commentaire. J'ai ouvert un sujet sur le forum concernant ces pistes de fond et les relations. Cdlt. commented 2026-02-28 10:52:27 UTC by ordinatous ♦8 |
| 178792425 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 46) | was ist das den nun am ende der Dragonerstraße? Rad+ Fußweg oder Fahrradstraße? commented 2026-02-28 10:49:04 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,510 |
| 177795884 (Comments: 1) | snippet (Discussed changesets: 4) | Just letting you know I recently https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178405682 removed the path tag. It was a path once, but is now abandoned and revegetated commented 2026-02-28 10:48:46 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179112887 (Comments: 2) | Дороги_54 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👋 Не рисуйте дороги поверх существующих. Уточняйте, разрезайте существующие. И будьте внимательнее, вы испортили дорогу около Масло... commented 2026-02-28 10:47:45 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 179111546 (Comments: 1) | Дороги_54 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179165376 commented 2026-02-28 10:44:46 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 179070396 (Comments: 1) | Дороги_54 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179165376 commented 2026-02-28 10:44:46 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 161188857 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | 37120625 maxspeed correct at western end, haven't checked the rest commented 2026-02-28 10:43:28 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 131590920 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 1134422226, 803274794, 187919554, 1101389172 maxspeed correct 132605108 maxspeed correct (didn't check 132605107). 498183594 previously surveyed maxspeed 60, you changed to 100, survey Nov 2025 confirmed maxspeed 60 476432064 maxspeed 5... commented 2026-02-28 10:37:41 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 133960071 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 10:26:50 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
 | 178385507 (Comments: 2) | Vaporeon2801 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 修正ありがとうございます。 commented 2026-02-28 10:26:13 UTC by Vaporeon2801 ♦3 |
| 131630395 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 4298725 maxspeed correct 1000969102 not checked commented 2026-02-28 10:21:12 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 178116118 (Comments: 1) | Labeeb Ahmed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A few remarks: This is a 'building' only project. Please stick to that. When you want to map highways, Use the tags as described in this wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging... commented 2026-02-28 10:16:52 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179148017 (Comments: 1) | Edawyt3425 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Stosuj się, proszę, do reguł nazywania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-28 10:15:56 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179146752 (Comments: 1) | Olaf56807R2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Stosuj się, proszę, do reguł nazywania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-28 10:15:22 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179062106 (Comments: 1) | Stoose (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in changeset id:179164426 commented 2026-02-28 10:12:35 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179062081 (Comments: 1) | Stoose (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in changeset id:179164124 commented 2026-02-28 10:02:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179125365 (Comments: 1) | Ksusha Zhegolko (Discussed changesets: 8) | неверно. Вход в метро разрешен его клиентам. Верну тег. commented 2026-02-28 10:02:48 UTC by literan ♦6,995 |
| 179128519 (Comments: 1) | Max22223 (Discussed changesets: 1) | не понимаю, зачем вы здания нарисовали такой формы. Исправил на корректную. commented 2026-02-28 10:00:51 UTC by literan ♦6,995 |
| 119689104 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | This section of highway is still maxspeed 50. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178527132 commented 2026-02-28 09:58:46 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179019368 (Comments: 1) | QDARK0218 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179163848 commented 2026-02-28 09:58:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178195690 (Comments: 1) | danli (Discussed changesets: 4) | so zur info. Man kann die Ladestation als fläche als amenity=charging_station mappen und dann die einzelnen Ladesäulen als man_made=charge_point :-) commented 2026-02-28 09:58:19 UTC by stillhart ♦184 |
| 178127111 (Comments: 2) | GrabVN_HHanh (Discussed changesets: 9) | Không biết bạn đi qua đây ngày nào mà lại tạo lối đi này commented 2026-02-28 09:50:07 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦36 |
| 157648985 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 09:49:53 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 157648867 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | Maxspeed correct for 22729556 (apart from northern end, part of 80 zone for 1322381000) 1322380999 is maxspeed 80, apart from northern end (50) (not 100) 644933368 maxspeed 80 644933367 eastern end 80, remainder correct 644933369 correct<... commented 2026-02-28 09:47:27 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 178757818 (Comments: 1) | flixwito (Discussed changesets: 1) | Halo, perubahan ini saya balikkan. Untuk pemula disarankan memetakan wilayah kecil dahulu. commented 2026-02-28 09:45:03 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179026469 (Comments: 1) | Useme_4728 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 179025913 commented 2026-02-28 09:44:47 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178996119 (Comments: 16) | BrummsLee (Discussed changesets: 19) | Super Sven, danke... 👍 So viel Arbeit wollte ich mit meiner Bearbeitung eigentlich niemanden aufhalsen! commented 2026-02-28 09:44:25 UTC by BrummsLee ♦37 |
| 98702463 (Comments: 3) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 80) | Така е, по кадастър съвпадат. Но снимката показва друго, а и техния сайт. Променям номера. commented 2026-02-28 09:38:27 UTC by Fraxi ♦274 |
| 179132025 (Comments: 9) | KiwiWasGone (Discussed changesets: 9) | Andere "wijken" beter dan "Elst-Noord": * https://www.nieuwbouwinelst.nl/de-pas/locatie/bereikbaarheid * https://elsterclopedie.marithaime.nl/wiki/Boerderij_Rijzenburg commented 2026-02-28 09:35:29 UTC by emvee ♦395 |
| 179151432 (Comments: 1) | edtahac (Discussed changesets: 3) | в названиях следует избегать аббревиатур, поправлю https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%89%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F... commented 2026-02-28 09:34:02 UTC by literan ♦6,995 |
| 161294089 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 09:31:35 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179055542 (Comments: 2) | itrivi (Discussed changesets: 41) | Este elemento https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079190090 que tenía una referencia y se indica que se llame bosque de Gomérez no sé por que le has quitado el nombre y lo has llamado de otra forma, que además como comento ... commented 2026-02-28 09:28:44 UTC by kapazao ♦995 |
| 172772665 (Comments: 1) | uknown-gryphus (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435013052 looks more like abandoned pillars from some construction planned long ago than a highway currently under construction commented 2026-02-28 09:27:48 UTC by TheLNL ♦12 |
| 179077325 (Comments: 1) | f_husni (Discussed changesets: 7) | Changeset ini bukan hanya ada di Tangerang Selatan, namun juga area Dukuhbenda di Brebes. commented 2026-02-28 09:27:44 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179158322 (Comments: 1) | Bayu Adi Styawan (Discussed changesets: 20) | Silakan ikut berdiskusi di changeset/178496473. Walaupun sudah Anda ubah, tetap akan diubah oleh seseorang. commented 2026-02-28 09:15:54 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179017272 (Comments: 1) | Charlie998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 179017119 commented 2026-02-28 09:13:56 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179118705 (Comments: 1) | pavelito (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 179017119 commented 2026-02-28 09:13:51 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179162628 (Comments: 1) | Gregory A Buford (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 09:09:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179043314 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_br93 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, please always ensure that default name tag is also duplicated as matching name:<lang> tag (name:he in this case) commented 2026-02-28 09:09:23 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,004 |
| 179044021 (Comments: 2) | Daniel_br93 (Discussed changesets: 3) | You are also welcome to take a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel where you'll find other local conventions. commented 2026-02-28 09:06:46 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,004 |
| 179157233 (Comments: 1) | SOLEHATUL MAJID (Discussed changesets: 1) | Halo selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Untuk pemula, silakan ikuti tutorial interaktif di editornya, tekan tombol H. Sepertinya editan ini malah membuat jalan di Desa Ngepringan hanya boleh jadi satu arah saja. commented 2026-02-28 09:06:10 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179023313 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 67) | Revert of 179016133 commented 2026-02-28 09:02:55 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 175054892 (Comments: 8) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 16) | Very fair point. I ended up not deleting the boundary as I realised it is an enclave within Indonesia's waters and not within Malaysia's commented 2026-02-28 09:02:10 UTC by peanuthole ♦5 |
| 179160661 (Comments: 2) | 27OuM1687O9ugtu5crv4 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke. Kandy bukan nama pemilik. commented 2026-02-28 08:58:46 UTC by 27OuM1687O9ugtu5crv4 ♦2 |
| 107464483 (Comments: 2) | velowunder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Auf MapBS, der offiziellen Seite der Stadt Basel, gibt es - wie du schreibst - die Rosentalstrasse 33 und 35 nicht mehr. Von daher lauten die neuen Adressen Sandgrubenstrasse. Das ist demnach korrekt. commented 2026-02-28 08:52:20 UTC by velowunder ♦1 |
| 171772055 (Comments: 4) | SportsnatureBugeySud (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, Nous sommes retombé sur l'itinéraire qui est problématique : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19587346 Ce n'est pas un itinéraire de réseau de carrefours, mais plusieurs. |
| 134003855 (Comments: 2) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Resurveyed Nov 2025 - definitely still maxspeed 40 for 95705823, 387687426, 96095197. Other roads previously maxspeed 20 has since been reduced to maxspeed 10. Updated at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178261553 commented 2026-02-28 08:34:48 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 146881278 (Comments: 3) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Resurveyed Nov 2025 - definitely still maxspeed 20 for this driveway commented 2026-02-28 08:29:47 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 118529041 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 08:27:55 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 129985322 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 534731418, 548708178 maxspeed correct Ramps not surveyed Nov 2025, but likely to reduce speed at top part of ramp commented 2026-02-28 08:26:54 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 164807118 (Comments: 1) | Andi Rapp (Discussed changesets: 1) | poderia esclarecer qual foi a razão para alterar o nome da paragem de “Praça do Comércio” para “Praça do Comércio (ônibus 728 pra Belém)”? A designação das paragens... commented 2026-02-28 08:23:22 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦213 |
| 135280232 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 293705778 - northern past maxspeed 60, southern part maxspeed 80. Updated at www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176738803 443028968 likely to be 80, but I didn't survey southern end so I've left this alone. I also didn't survey 4430289... commented 2026-02-28 08:22:50 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 131357003 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | I've left these maxspeeds alone. At survey Nov 2025 was part of construction site for Coffs Harbour Bypass, maxspeeds will need reviewing after bypass opens. commented 2026-02-28 08:16:42 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179161387 (Comments: 1) | haselhorstmelanie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 08:15:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179161252 (Comments: 1) | haselhorstmelanie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 08:12:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179019476 (Comments: 1) | QDARK0218 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179161329, 179118846 commented 2026-02-28 08:11:28 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178650767 (Comments: 4) | RJ Lerng (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, I will delete the tag from the node. Thanks for your input! RJ commented 2026-02-28 08:10:58 UTC by RJ Lerng ♦1 |
| 178694468 (Comments: 2) | Jerry1178 (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG here: Unfortunately Changeset comments cannot be redacted by the DWG! Objects can be redacted, but that is not the case here. Best regards Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group commented 2026-02-28 08:09:24 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,862 |
| 146011785 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Nancy Bird Walton Drive: maxspeed 50 986835176 (not 80), 1237939580 (not 60). 697181012 and 697181014 northern halves 80 (not 60), southern halves 50 (not 60) 697181013 maxspeed correct Exit ramp 608018806 maxspeed 110 (not 100) Ocean ... commented 2026-02-28 08:04:37 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179105761 (Comments: 10) | markalex- (Discussed changesets: 9) | Don't know about Potlatch, never seen it even in screenshots. But iD is definitely superior to JOSM for casual stuff - you just start editing, no need to download something, sync something, etc. And IT people are famously lazy)) commented 2026-02-28 07:57:09 UTC by markalex- ♦13 |
| 179154720 (Comments: 1) | croche-eraser (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, There's another self intersection to Way: 899504108 which, (with the other self intersections), seems to suggest that the building-part Way: 1459296545 was dragged. I've not done any correction here. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-02-28 07:52:28 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,105 |
| 179079796 (Comments: 1) | Giuseppe4ne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Giuseppe4ne, this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=14.99293&lat=41.67069&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&... commented 2026-02-28 07:52:25 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| 178934800 (Comments: 2) | Alessio Alfei (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Alessio, this error still exits: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=12.99814&lat=42.08351&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges Can we get your feedback here? Guido commented 2026-02-28 07:49:58 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| 128460517 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | No maxspeed sign seen for ways 85480771, 321445116, 443174872, 443174873, 85396895 - previously surveyed as maxspeed 50, but as I can't confirm I've left maxspeed alone. I've left roundabout 85396903 alone as well commented 2026-02-28 07:36:08 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179036488 (Comments: 5) | Parowiec Świecący (Discussed changesets: 5) | Byłem wczoraj, sprawdziłem i nie było żadnego znaku na wjeździe. Więc tak jak to teraz poprawiłeś, uznałbym, że jest ok. Dzięki! commented 2026-02-28 07:35:14 UTC by YomanNH ♦474 |
| 179160152 (Comments: 1) | Pavellllpavell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 07:27:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 128459223 (Comments: 2) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 85386175, 1044377931 (Muldoon Street) previously surveyed maxspeed 50, you changed to 60. Survey Nov 2025 confirms maxspeed 50. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176262329 No maxspeed signs seen for 85386161, 85480779, 1044377933, 1... commented 2026-02-28 07:26:44 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179159623 (Comments: 2) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 40) | You even didn't read what i tell you. There isn't a tag named parking. For parking acces street you must use parking_aisle. commented 2026-02-28 07:20:52 UTC by rarad74 ♦427 |
| 128459033 (Comments: 2) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Maxspeed 50 (not 60) for Oxley Street (443174274, 85396893, 443174275) and Cowper Street (85396898, 443174271, 443174276) Roundabout 85396892 maxspeed 50 Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176262329 commented 2026-02-28 07:19:35 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
 | 179129699 (Comments: 5) | jbmktg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @Timmy_Tesseract https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179158815 commented 2026-02-28 07:02:49 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
 | 179159408 (Comments: 1) | NINETY boutique hotel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 06:51:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 125637651 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 386410347 maxspeed correct 115306154 no maxspeed sign at survey Nov 2025 so unable to confirm maxspeed. commented 2026-02-28 06:51:25 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 130229132 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 260047151 maxspeed previous 90, you changed to 100. Survey Nov 2025 confirmed maxspeed 90. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176262329 Way 1123238714 maxspeed 110 correct Change of maxspeed between these two is a little to north.... commented 2026-02-28 06:42:53 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 178798706 (Comments: 3) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-02-28 06:37:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178798641 (Comments: 3) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-02-28 06:37:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 125681543 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Way 170055592, 170055915, 170055917, previously surveyed as 50, you changed to 60, survey Nov 2025 confirms maxspeed is 50. Way 170055414 (roundabout) maxspeed is 50 (not 60) Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179007813 Ways 17... commented 2026-02-28 06:30:45 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 178955222 (Comments: 3) | JamesonTC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Awesome, thanks for confirming! commented 2026-02-28 06:18:24 UTC by pwbriggs ♦170 |
 | 179103285 (Comments: 2) | NKA (Discussed changesets: 145) | Thanks commented 2026-02-28 06:16:30 UTC by NKA ♦254 |
| 131589434 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 06:11:19 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 130269392 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct, although location of change of maxspeed is a little further north (updated at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179007813) commented 2026-02-28 06:08:24 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179127462 (Comments: 1) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hast du einen tracktype hierzu? commented 2026-02-28 06:07:11 UTC by Geo-Tobi ♦308 |
| 129724207 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Malpas Street (New England Highway) - previously surveyed as maxspeed 50, you changed to 70. Survey Nov 2025 confirms maxspeed is 50. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176165200 (ways 98290444, 628566415, 762382437, 762382439, 76238244... commented 2026-02-28 06:02:00 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 140826187 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 532653326- maxspeed correct 597879545 - only northern section is maxspeed 80, remainder is maxspeed 100. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178527132 commented 2026-02-28 05:46:52 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179157927 (Comments: 1) | Atticus Injury Law PC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 05:36:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178801984 (Comments: 2) | Farmers Insurance - Justin Hixon (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178891023 commented 2026-02-28 05:33:16 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178795011 (Comments: 2) | Allecoudent_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179157902 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-28 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
 | 178796000 (Comments: 2) | Mbr Dubai LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178814208 commented 2026-02-28 05:33:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178794929 (Comments: 2) | 19131005 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179157901 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-28 05:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178792656 (Comments: 2) | 500384150 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179157900 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-28 05:33:09 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178790576 (Comments: 2) | GrungyGirl (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179157894 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-28 05:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 161327815 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 05:25:38 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 179114875 (Comments: 2) | Manos Roudas (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam at the expense of a legitimate business in Glyfada. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179157684 commented 2026-02-28 05:19:14 UTC by ika-chan! ♦334 |
| 179081936 (Comments: 1) | stratos008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset was reverted because it replaced well-mapped ways with those with missing valid tags. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179157410 commented 2026-02-28 04:57:51 UTC by ika-chan! ♦334 |
| 177987446 (Comments: 2) | countrymouse (Discussed changesets: 4) | It looks like this node has been deleted now. I had checked only address formatting without checking the appropriateness of the other pre-existing tags. Thank you for addressing this issue! commented 2026-02-28 04:52:18 UTC by countrymouse ♦1 |
| 178336084 (Comments: 4) | luke_unknown (Discussed changesets: 3) | That is to say, do edits in Canada in a separate changeset, rather than including them within the same one. commented 2026-02-28 04:40:29 UTC by Circular Elevation ♦3 |
| 179153739 (Comments: 1) | 67emre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Exista un sistem cu nod-uri ce poarta denumrea zonelor/cartierelor in tot Bucurestiul. Exista deja Iancului. Nu se deseneaza suprapus zone rezidentiale peste zona rezidentiala a Bucurestiului cu nume de cartiere. Asa o sa facem o cacialma de d... commented 2026-02-28 04:25:35 UTC by rarad74 ♦427 |
| 179156781 (Comments: 1) | Kim Carpin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-28 04:12:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179110351 (Comments: 5) | Mora3000 (Discussed changesets: 6) | I am random since I pull from here https://notesreview.org/ -- Closed businesses are often easy to help with since I can research. Will try to remember to write more in comments commented 2026-02-28 04:05:06 UTC by Mora3000 ♦2 |
| 173945606 (Comments: 2) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ok, let's delete it commented 2026-02-28 03:39:57 UTC by w_djatmiko ♦10 |
| 179155170 (Comments: 1) | ampak (Discussed changesets: 5) | Good job adding more buildings just make sure they align with gps traces although I doubt there are any there! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179155170 ... commented 2026-02-28 03:33:54 UTC by Alexis Giraud-Courtney (CoMaps) ♦16 |
| 179024147 (Comments: 1) | Kinga | Edycje (Discussed changesets: 59) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-02-28 03:22:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179022909 (Comments: 1) | Kinga | Edycje (Discussed changesets: 59) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-02-28 03:22:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179021126 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 448) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2026-02-28 03:22:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179018062 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 448) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2026-02-28 03:22:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 179020538 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 448) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2026-02-28 03:22:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 177923442 (Comments: 4) | Tomaussie_17 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Tomaussie, I definitely understand where you are coming from. There seems to be some anomalies in the road/path design vs signage of the same. In the Kingston and Greater Dandenong areas there are a number of areas where a wider and... commented 2026-02-28 02:53:02 UTC by HighRouleur ♦67 |
| 179148625 (Comments: 1) | uy73jd (Discussed changesets: 1) | This doesn't look like a motorway since it doesn't have limited access. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2026-02-28 02:26:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 179110817 (Comments: 1) | SeanCityNavy (Discussed changesets: 1) | You tagged the way as a track, which implies used by 4WD vehicles. highway=path is what we typically call a trail. Just checking to make sure you got the right type of way. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2026-02-28 02:23:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 179155561 (Comments: 1) | HAALAND_ (Discussed changesets: 9) | 实际应该是盛达弘璟小区 实在抱歉 commented 2026-02-28 02:16:48 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 179155529 (Comments: 1) | HAALAND_ (Discussed changesets: 9) | 误删 已重新添加 commented 2026-02-28 02:16:08 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 179155527 (Comments: 1) | HAALAND_ (Discussed changesets: 9) | 误删 已重新添加 commented 2026-02-28 02:15:12 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 179155534 (Comments: 1) | HAALAND_ (Discussed changesets: 9) | 嘶 ..又认错了 我的问题抱歉 commented 2026-02-28 02:10:49 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 175747100 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 463) | Według streetview tam nie jest teren zabudowany. Jeśli nie zmieniono oznakowania, to dalej jest źle. commented 2026-02-28 00:56:44 UTC by olo81 ♦709 |
| 179081983 (Comments: 1) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 26) | Notiz war https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4421956 commented 2026-02-28 00:09:11 UTC by rohieb ♦157 |
| 179144783 (Comments: 2) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 162) | Hi, Sorry, I made a mistake. I just deleted those item=* commented 2026-02-28 00:06:55 UTC by Olyon ♦132 |
| 151169089 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 137) | Errr No. Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. In principle the surface parking would be part of the mall too. I'd put a simple way around the hole outside of the block and put the tags on that .. depending on the... commented 2026-02-28 00:05:10 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,748 |
| 179082365 (Comments: 1) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 26) | Der Nachvollziehbarkeit halber, die Diskussion dazu war in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5090940 commented 2026-02-28 00:03:51 UTC by rohieb ♦157 |
 | 179101013 (Comments: 3) | josepgomi (Discussed changesets: 1) | According to the National Geographic Institute, the name is "Andorra la Vella" https://www.ign.es/iberpix/visor/ commented 2026-02-28 00:00:14 UTC by josepgomi ♦1 |
| 179118372 (Comments: 1) | [a-C*]Wyatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OSM! The multipolygon grass relation is in error ... the outer ways cannot share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.57355&lat=-37.70232&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standar... commented 2026-02-27 23:52:43 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,748 |
| 179012410 (Comments: 1) | m@rio (Discussed changesets: 139) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8391974446 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-02-27 23:42:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,329 |
| 178898345 (Comments: 3) | Germini (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nach den Bildern würd ich sagen: optimal 👍🏻 commented 2026-02-27 23:19:55 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 15016376 (Comments: 1) | Ben Siesta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut Ben, Merci pour ta contribution, simplement pour te demander de faire attention a justifier tes modifications (laisser un commentaire). Merci d'avance, joyeuse cartographie ! commented 2026-02-27 23:15:11 UTC by Nexinor ♦3 |
| 171531671 (Comments: 4) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hey wikilux. Danke für die Charger :-) Kleine Info, die gesamte fläche ist eine charging station und die einzelne Ladestationen sind dann "Ladepunkte". Auf deutsch etwas verwirrend, ja :-) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2026-02-27 23:03:59 UTC by stillhart ♦184 |
| 179074461 (Comments: 2) | LiudmilaBareika (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry please disregard apparently my memory is failing, I even surveyed the final alignment for panoramax. I should have checked the images before i reverted. The north alignment was temopary while the road was under construction. the road now goes s... commented 2026-02-27 23:00:44 UTC by kitsee ♦131 |
| 178496473 (Comments: 4) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hai Gaung Tebono, Saya memperhatikan beberapa perubahan klasifikasi baru-baru ini pada jalan sekunder di sekitar area Ngawi (node/1565413690) yang ingin saya ketahui lebih lanjut. Misalnya, jalan (way/151571138 dan way/675342640) ditingkatkan ... commented 2026-02-27 22:56:53 UTC by Hightide10 ♦11 |
 | 179074677 (Comments: 2) | codywindrose (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yeah! The whole atoll. I have never been there though. I see you quite a lot in object history around here, I think you did stuff like added addresses and points of interest? I try to not change too much about points of interest because I really have... commented 2026-02-27 22:48:09 UTC by codywindrose ♦2 |
| 179126009 (Comments: 3) | db-ak (Discussed changesets: 43) | to pięknie bardzo commented 2026-02-27 22:45:54 UTC by Yog Sot ♦428 |
| 178425132 (Comments: 2) | Nicolac38 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I also noticed you formatted height tags as 1m60. Would you mind reformatting those to height = 1.60 m ? This is the standard formatting style for height tags, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height for documentation. commented 2026-02-27 22:45:13 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦655 |
| 177084003 (Comments: 1) | TorCguy (Discussed changesets: 28) | Please stop spamming highway=unclassified everywhere. There is no reason for way 18940244 to be anything other than residential. It literally only has houses on it. commented 2026-02-27 22:42:39 UTC by rivermont ♦237 |
| 177789288 (Comments: 1) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 19) | Middle Rocks are very existent (more so than South Ledge, which only pokes above water at low tide) and part of Malaysia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Rocks commented 2026-02-27 22:12:07 UTC by peanuthole ♦5 |
| 179110202 (Comments: 1) | PowerMapper77 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey PowerMapper77, I assume the data you added with this (and the once for the other states) was an import and you haven't reviewed them one by one? If so, such imports need to follow the Import Guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki... commented 2026-02-27 22:11:33 UTC by aighes ♦34 |
| 179054975 (Comments: 1) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi It's not a place of worship anymore - this church is damaged since 1946. Please, be more careful next time commented 2026-02-27 22:06:47 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦854 |
| 179150261 (Comments: 2) | Iloveyouhamburgers (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ik heb de accesstagging aangepast. Die accesstagging is best lastig. Hier wat tips hoe een fietspad te taggen. G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a G13: moped=no, mo... commented 2026-02-27 21:54:43 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179150836 (Comments: 1) | tyfi (Discussed changesets: 422) | By "semantics" I'm mostly referring to connectedness such as (1) parking aisles connecting to parking areas at their boundaries and (2) a paved footway connecting to the gazebo it leads to. I also added some trees 🌳 commented 2026-02-27 21:47:35 UTC by tyfi ♦438 |
| 160398317 (Comments: 4) | AndreaDp271 (Discussed changesets: 8) | fai fai commented 2026-02-27 21:47:24 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦142 |
| 177761173 (Comments: 4) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 81) | There are underground corridors that enable travelers to walk from Saint-Lazare all the way to Opera, as displayed on the RATP map https://www.ratp.fr/plans. However I think there are really two hubs : 1. Saint-Lazare railway stations + Haussm... commented 2026-02-27 21:40:05 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,188 |
| 179150378 (Comments: 1) | Willow_Zero (Discussed changesets: 1) | forgot to add source https://www.newpaltzchurch.org/ commented 2026-02-27 21:28:03 UTC by Willow_Zero ♦1 |
| 178548030 (Comments: 4) | Tokke_1111 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for clarifying. Best regards, On behalf of the NeisBot commented 2026-02-27 21:17:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179088561 (Comments: 1) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 20) | 😍 commented 2026-02-27 21:09:50 UTC by stillhart ♦184 |
| 178141462 (Comments: 1) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 20) | 😍 commented 2026-02-27 21:06:14 UTC by stillhart ♦184 |
| 178785613 (Comments: 5) | Aroru (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ternyata tersangkut juga ya di changeset/178962374. Changeset revert-nya terlalu besar, jadi saya tidak bisa membantu. Jangan kehilangan semangat. Mungkin lain kali didiskusikan dulu dengan komunitas OSM Indonesia perihal kegiatan impor via Telegram.... commented 2026-02-27 21:03:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179149710 (Comments: 1) | tyfi (Discussed changesets: 422) | This also connects up some isolated drain segments I added many moons ago commented 2026-02-27 21:03:36 UTC by tyfi ♦438 |
| 179136939 (Comments: 1) | KR Kgn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте, в OSM принято указывать полные названия статусной части без сокращений (например, вместо "Весенний пер." нужно указыва... commented 2026-02-27 20:58:42 UTC by Grass-snake ♦266 |
| 179145761 (Comments: 2) | Glanc Cleaner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opis (tag description) został usunięty - OSM to nie miejsce do reklamowania swoich usług. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-02-27 20:56:38 UTC by bartgron ♦541 |
| 179100595 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 44) | The unnecessarily created node has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179102054. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-27 20:53:06 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦9 |
| 179104407 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 44) | The unnecessary source:hgv tag has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149329#map=18/41.779063/-71.441876. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-27 20:51:11 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦9 |
| 50274354 (Comments: 4) | terpind (Discussed changesets: 1) | Odstranjeno. commented 2026-02-27 20:50:53 UTC by JanezPavelZebovec ♦19 |
| 179101100 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 44) | The unnecessary source:hgv has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149258. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-27 20:47:09 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦9 |
| 179101885 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 44) | The unnecessary source:hgv has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149161. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-27 20:45:32 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦9 |
| 179112398 (Comments: 1) | chootman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on th... commented 2026-02-27 20:44:35 UTC by MassCartog ♦320 |
 | 179148755 (Comments: 2) | Johand199 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Should have reverted it on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179148996 commented 2026-02-27 20:39:15 UTC by Johand199 ♦2 |
| 179066168 (Comments: 7) | BunnyAlive (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aktuell soweit alles klar. Ich werde mich noch mehr mit der Dateneingabe bei OSM beschäftigen ;-). commented 2026-02-27 20:22:53 UTC by BunnyAlive ♦1 |
| 179145886 (Comments: 3) | anonuser6345 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the review and fixes! commented 2026-02-27 20:16:54 UTC by anonuser6345 ♦1 |
| 179146602 (Comments: 1) | Fl4k76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej Tänkte bara kolla om du även kollade tunnelbaneplanet, då kiosken var taggad med level=-1 commented 2026-02-27 20:16:13 UTC by Snusmumriken ♦155 |
| 170215420 (Comments: 1) | Xre90 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hallo Xre90, du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13059686037 und anscheinend noch an einigen anderen Orten https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2liH operator:wikidata=248377441 erfasst. Was genau heißt diese Zahl? commented 2026-02-27 19:42:46 UTC by os-emmer ♦351 |
| 179144492 (Comments: 1) | Щаковый ник (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179146559 commented 2026-02-27 19:38:49 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 176752248 (Comments: 2) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 39) | Ups, wird gleich angeschaut und ggf. korregiert. Ich habe mich wohl vorhin zu sehr auf die Relationen fokussiert ;) Danke für den Hinweis! commented 2026-02-27 19:34:24 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦46 |
| 179144074 (Comments: 2) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Honest, I was seeing how far it'd go. I'll revert back to preset circle with 8 or 12 nodes commented 2026-02-27 19:18:35 UTC by I-76 ♦55 |
| 179114856 (Comments: 2) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thank You, corrected commented 2026-02-27 18:59:45 UTC by dima monsky ♦6 |
 | 178711863 (Comments: 5) | mat (Discussed changesets: 33) | Oui on est daccord sur la définition du mot, le sujet est que les définitions ne parlent pas de transit justement (a part l'interprétation fr) Voir ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway Si un lieu dans le w... commented 2026-02-27 18:56:18 UTC by Violaine_Do ♦193 |
| 179129327 (Comments: 4) | ArLan67 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Helemaal prima. Dank voor de feedback! Goed weekend! commented 2026-02-27 18:45:25 UTC by ArLan67 ♦2 |
| 178946529 (Comments: 1) | StaleZombie (Discussed changesets: 2) | This edit turned the entire city of Grand Island, Nebraska into a big building. I reverted this in 179144224. Presumably you wanted to add a specific building for Nebraskaland Distributors? commented 2026-02-27 18:37:02 UTC by jhuang97 ♦14 |
| 179143563 (Comments: 1) | igab4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-27 18:18:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179107671 (Comments: 6) | superoci (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt! commented 2026-02-27 18:11:36 UTC by superoci ♦2 |
| 179111421 (Comments: 2) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, I apologize for any errors I've made. Feel free to revert or overwrite any mistakes, and let me if there's anything I can do to help fix the errors. I don't think I changed the sidewalk alignment much in this particular c... commented 2026-02-27 18:11:23 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦8 |
| 179142426 (Comments: 1) | Sara Bayramova (Discussed changesets: 1) | . commented 2026-02-27 18:08:35 UTC by Sara Bayramova ♦1 |
| X | 177947262 (Comments: 2) | ferog_v (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola Cristian disculpa ¿a que te refieres con calle? commented 2026-02-27 18:06:47 UTC by ferog_v ♦25 |
| 179093183 (Comments: 3) | JBible92 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello JBible92 Phil from The Data Working Group here. For the avoidance of doubt we cannot use Google Maps as a source in OSM, not to check, verify or justify an edit. The correct nane is what is on the sign, not what someone has told you. If ... commented 2026-02-27 18:02:08 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,597 |
 | 179106345 (Comments: 1) | surveyor_jr (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please don't just dump data from other sources into OSM! If you want to import data, please read and follow our import guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines commented 2026-02-27 17:59:26 UTC by mueschel ♦6,938 |
| 179069933 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 253) | Hi, "name:zh_zhuyin" doesn't exist. The proper tag is "name:zh-Bopo" - which already exists on the objects you edited. commented 2026-02-27 17:58:01 UTC by mueschel ♦6,938 |
 | 179097847 (Comments: 4) | Thomas Parrott (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks @silversurfer83 Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179140997 commented 2026-02-27 17:57:38 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179018645 (Comments: 2) | Borut Kantušer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please, stop deleting names. Stop deleting data if you don't know what you are doing, Please, ask for help. Thank You. commented 2026-02-27 17:52:11 UTC by gpstracks ♦100 |
| 179085281 (Comments: 1) | Borut Kantušer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please, stop deleting names. Stop deleting data if you don't know what you are doing, Please, ask for help. Thank You. commented 2026-02-27 17:51:49 UTC by gpstracks ♦100 |
| 178674333 (Comments: 3) | Glocke-Oelde (Discussed changesets: 16) | Moin! Das wäre super, das einmal abklären zu lassen. Ggf. muss dann der Weg über den Platz angepasst werden. VG geomaniX commented 2026-02-27 17:50:48 UTC by geomaniX ♦53 |
| 179107126 (Comments: 2) | AngelB (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks commented 2026-02-27 17:47:38 UTC by AngelB ♦2 |
| 178995249 (Comments: 1) | ASMustis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. OpenStreetMap'in yol sınıflandırması resmi yol sınıflandırmasından farklı. Örneğin yakındaki başka bir yol ile karşılaştırırsak, etiketini değiştirdiğiniz yolların Çorlu-Çerkezköy yolu ile ay... commented 2026-02-27 17:42:24 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦231 |
| 179131191 (Comments: 1) | Manhattan_MG (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai enlever le name=* mais j'ai laissé le reste revert partiel dans 179142252 commented 2026-02-27 17:39:45 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 179102696 (Comments: 3) | Godfred_uew (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, Unfortunately that is not how you should be mapping them. Since the limit / extent of these neighborhoods are not clear, adding them as random areas (polygons) is not useful. Here is what to do, add a node (point) somewhere in the center ... commented 2026-02-27 17:39:30 UTC by Enock4seth ♦610 |
| 179142121 (Comments: 1) | sleep enjoyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-27 17:36:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179131472 (Comments: 1) | Rspad08 (Discussed changesets: 4) | revert partiel dans 179142125 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179131472 commented 2026-02-27 17:35:54 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 178762897 (Comments: 2) | Bbcaparas (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178817086 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178773659 (Comments: 2) | Leotheshadowhunter (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178807161 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178783873 (Comments: 2) | 500374057 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179018851 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178782747 (Comments: 2) | PlumbSmart Plumbing (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178783413 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178778064 (Comments: 2) | Allecoudent_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178795011 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178782198 (Comments: 2) | Albattar 53 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179142072 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 17:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178779020 (Comments: 2) | Borderwicks (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179142071 (Delete all added tags) commented 2026-02-27 17:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178772068 (Comments: 2) | myocpodiatrist (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179142066 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 17:33:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178778016 (Comments: 2) | ME Productions (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179142070 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 17:33:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178777402 (Comments: 2) | Laboratorio clinico roma (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179142069 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 17:33:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178766751 (Comments: 2) | Focuslogic IT Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178853334 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:06 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178769486 (Comments: 2) | lightningpoolservice (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179142064 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 17:33:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178763602 (Comments: 2) | New Vision Seamless Gutters (Discussed changesets: 1) | ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178853253 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178764947 (Comments: 2) | Dr Josef Thurner Ästhetische Plastische Chirurgie (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178770408 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178761269 (Comments: 2) | Gold King at Hickory (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179142062 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-27 17:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178757127 (Comments: 2) | morpheonco (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178758436 commented 2026-02-27 17:33:01 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 179131770 (Comments: 1) | Rspad08 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, si ce bâtiment a bel et bien brûlé, vous pouvez ajouter le tag destroyed:building au lieu de building revert dans 179141870 commented 2026-02-27 17:32:07 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 179130942 (Comments: 1) | Rspad08 (Discussed changesets: 4) | revert dans 179141654 commented 2026-02-27 17:25:18 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 173286411 (Comments: 4) | pkoby (Discussed changesets: 55) | Alright, sorry for not commenting back till now. I agree that a lot of the sections aren't "park"; I added them in reference to MontCo parks boundaries, but that doesn't seem to transfer 1:1 to OSM in this case. I have been throug... commented 2026-02-27 17:24:03 UTC by pkoby ♦119 |
| 179061691 (Comments: 1) | Jojolaglandouille (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour jojolaglandouille, Ne considère pas ce message comme une critique mais plutôt comme une suggestion pour cohérence avec ce qu'on l'on fait en général en France. Mettre plusieurs zones l... commented 2026-02-27 17:22:21 UTC by zorglubu ♦353 |
| 179141428 (Comments: 1) | Frank Castle 2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-27 17:21:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179110785 (Comments: 1) | carlosguerrero_lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | can you please take another look at where ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39349857 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11113189 meet as the angle they come together at seems rather sharp and thus unlikely, If you send me a screen shot of the... commented 2026-02-27 17:07:34 UTC by Udarian ♦664 |
| 179131226 (Comments: 1) | Rspad08 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! Merci pour votre contribution. J'ai enlevé le nom sur la maison car il s'agit pas du nom du bâtiment en plus d'être une information privée. Vous pouvez vous fair... commented 2026-02-27 17:05:37 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 179131470 (Comments: 1) | Lisouille107 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap et merci pour votre contribution. J'ai enlevé les attributs avec le nom car ces objets n'en possèdent pas. Vous pouvez vous faire une carte personnalisée en utilisant Umap ou Fram... commented 2026-02-27 16:52:28 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 179131312 (Comments: 4) | Rob Hooft (Discussed changesets: 8) | Too many options ;-) commented 2026-02-27 16:51:30 UTC by Rob Hooft ♦4 |
 | 179080557 (Comments: 1) | spektrum3714 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179140202 where the comment is: "Remove testdata" commented 2026-02-27 16:47:24 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 179081117 (Comments: 1) | spektrum3714 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179140185 where the comment is: "Remove testdata" commented 2026-02-27 16:47:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 179133662 (Comments: 2) | spektrum3714 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179140146 where the comment is: "Remove testdata" commented 2026-02-27 16:46:43 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 177068551 (Comments: 1) | Outdoorrookie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Für water=pond ist area=yes impliziert, also musst du das nicht extra hinzufügen :) commented 2026-02-27 16:44:40 UTC by habi ♦2,038 |
| 179102462 (Comments: 2) | MJpi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you very much for your comments. I have tried to check the square construction very carefully with the tool, checking thoroughly, but I will review the error. Thank you very much! commented 2026-02-27 16:37:05 UTC by MJpi ♦1 |
| 178941833 (Comments: 2) | Aroru (Discussed changesets: 5) | Maaf karena melakukan impor terlalu instan, lain kali akan saya ikuti petunjuk commented 2026-02-27 16:36:32 UTC by Aroru ♦4 |
| 179049560 (Comments: 1) | BeardMD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, los números de teléfono ya se encuentran en contact:mobile, no es necesario duplicar la información en contact:phone, no? Los vuelvo a dejar en su correspondiente contact:mobile solo. Si hay algún problema que ... commented 2026-02-27 16:30:03 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
 | 179100446 (Comments: 1) | Mphatso Taliana (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. FYI. Please vi... commented 2026-02-27 16:13:33 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
 | 179100924 (Comments: 1) | Simon Peter Makobi (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Just a remark. Highways in rural areas are not to be tagged as residential. Use "unclassified" instead. Reminder: Please be sure to square ... commented 2026-02-27 16:09:24 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179101551 (Comments: 1) | Mphatso Taliana (Discussed changesets: 2) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-02-27 16:07:44 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179101774 (Comments: 1) | Innocent Ntambo (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-02-27 16:06:28 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179101955 (Comments: 1) | Timekumpembedza hhbe (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-02-27 16:04:22 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179102254 (Comments: 2) | Luke Barrett (Discussed changesets: 2) | Explanation can be found in this document which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit Best regards and keep mapping! Frans S ... commented 2026-02-27 15:59:50 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179105473 (Comments: 1) | ben vickers 1 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. FYI. Please vi... commented 2026-02-27 15:45:47 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179126738 (Comments: 1) | NeemaAlphonce (Discussed changesets: 9) | You uploaded duplicated infrastructure! Please stop doing so! I fixed it manually. commented 2026-02-27 15:44:50 UTC by ratrun ♦274 |
| 179127328 (Comments: 1) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:43:31 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 179127399 (Comments: 2) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:43:17 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 179128713 (Comments: 3) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:43:04 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 179128833 (Comments: 3) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:42:55 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 179119664 (Comments: 1) | Totot jato trava (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dá se zde odevzdat jakékoliv sklo, například i zrcadla, nebo jen skleněné láhve? Stejně tak jakýkoliv plast, včetně stavebních plastů, nebo jen plastové obaly a láhve? commented 2026-02-27 15:42:39 UTC by mapperue ♦235 |
| 179129075 (Comments: 2) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:42:34 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
 | 179070881 (Comments: 1) | AnssiMoi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179137274 commented 2026-02-27 15:42:18 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179129386 (Comments: 1) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:42:11 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 179129434 (Comments: 1) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:42:03 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 179129579 (Comments: 1) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:41:55 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 179108261 (Comments: 1) | BYU Mapper15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. FYI. Please vi... commented 2026-02-27 15:41:39 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179131278 (Comments: 1) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response commented 2026-02-27 15:41:37 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 178963042 (Comments: 3) | Jelv (Discussed changesets: 11) | Heb verzocht een en ander aan te passen. Voor nu kloppen jouw aanpassingen dus. Zo gauw ik een foto zie waarop een Bitcoin-sticker op de deur of bij de kassa zit en de tekst op de website is veranderd, pas ik de tags weer aan. commented 2026-02-27 15:41:02 UTC by Comino ♦313 |
| 165817442 (Comments: 4) | JMRosenfeld (Discussed changesets: 4) | restored in changeset 179137247# commented 2026-02-27 15:40:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 170356912 (Comments: 1) | Reitstoen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Is this really a path? It crosses a marsch with no sign of any path from the aerial photos (which of course could be out of date). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421834993 commented 2026-02-27 15:31:52 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 179062121 (Comments: 1) | Stoose (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in changeset id:179136279 commented 2026-02-27 15:19:30 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 173380727 (Comments: 2) | Eric Royer (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok désolé, d'habitude je vérifie et je travaille sur BD Ortho IGN mais ça à du passé à travers, merci commented 2026-02-27 15:14:42 UTC by Eric Royer ♦1 |
| 179108508 (Comments: 1) | BYU Mapper 14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Revie... commented 2026-02-27 15:14:42 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 179105416 (Comments: 1) | Passion Baumpflege (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo "Passion Baumpflege" und Willkommen bei OSM. Deinen Eintrag habe ich mit dem Typ Gartne- u. Landschaftsgärtner (craft=gardener) erweitert und als Punkt (POI) gesetzt. Du kannst den POI gern noch mit Webseite, Telefon oder &Ou... commented 2026-02-27 15:08:56 UTC by schoka ♦55 |
| 179134330 (Comments: 2) | AbinayaSivakumar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the feedback. I understand and will keep future changeset comments neutral and factual. commented 2026-02-27 15:07:48 UTC by AbinayaSivakumar ♦1 |
| 179135120 (Comments: 1) | regina hernandez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-27 14:54:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 170256408 (Comments: 2) | Taltos02 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I just saw Konzum bought MirAcolo.. commented 2026-02-27 14:51:16 UTC by Janjko ♦88 |
| 178823470 (Comments: 4) | schabanel (Discussed changesets: 21) | Je ne suis pas certain de comprendre le conflit de classification ici. La source du point supprimé était fausse car concernait les anciens tags (l'agence postale), la source du bâtiment n'est clairement pas le cadastre d... commented 2026-02-27 14:47:23 UTC by schabanel ♦20 |
| 141733995 (Comments: 2) | Viima (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello and thank you for you question. There is likely a traffic sign that indicates that there is a parking area. I do not know why there is also a footway area. The heating=fee likely refers to the heating poles available at the site and to t... commented 2026-02-27 14:35:57 UTC by Viima ♦24 |
| 179133761 (Comments: 1) | Esteban Trujillo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-27 14:21:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179119967 (Comments: 1) | vrg (Discussed changesets: 24) | To nie jest właściwy opis zestawu zmian - patrz tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-27 14:20:21 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179130960 (Comments: 5) | olcastle (Discussed changesets: 6) | Done. commented 2026-02-27 14:15:22 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,767 |
| 179128886 (Comments: 1) | miecio9999999 (Discussed changesets: 5) | To nie jest właściwy opis zestawu zmian - patrz tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-27 14:14:42 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
 | 178704345 (Comments: 1) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178704402 (Comments: 2) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178980564 (Comments: 1) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178704073 (Comments: 1) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178562852 (Comments: 2) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178637181 (Comments: 1) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178701190 (Comments: 3) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178703486 (Comments: 1) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178704136 (Comments: 1) | abtal1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451 commented 2026-02-27 14:12:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179132414 (Comments: 1) | sal256 (Discussed changesets: 6) | To nie jest właściwy opis zestawu zmian - patrz tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-27 14:11:49 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179131184 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 34) | I think the problem here is that Lewis J. Smith Park, which encompasses the pool and roller hockey, is absorbed into McMoran park currently. This may be on the official map as such, but I figure the former should be recognized as an area. The borders... commented 2026-02-27 14:09:20 UTC by I-76 ♦55 |
 | 179132120 (Comments: 1) | MgA1000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 345 of your last 411 changes were deletions. This is quite... commented 2026-02-27 13:46:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 179081680 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:40 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081707 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:40 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081725 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:40 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081693 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:40 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081639 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081661 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081621 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081543 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081553 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081592 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081564 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081528 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081605 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081650 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081395 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081451 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081408 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081516 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081479 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081484 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081429 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081443 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081500 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081358 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081339 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081369 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081327 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081313 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081387 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081288 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:36 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081301 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:36 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081281 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:36 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081264 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:36 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081244 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:36 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081202 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:35 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081172 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:35 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081176 (Comments: 3) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:35 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081232 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:35 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081184 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:35 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081210 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:35 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179079947 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:35 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179081192 (Comments: 2) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:35 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178983475 (Comments: 4) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:34 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179078488 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:34 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179076272 (Comments: 1) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:34 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| X | 178983500 (Comments: 3) | Roboost (Discussed changesets: 46) | Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390 commented 2026-02-27 13:43:34 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 179131459 (Comments: 1) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Worked but no conflation commented 2026-02-27 13:24:54 UTC by I-76 ♦55 |
| 179131455 (Comments: 1) | Thomas Parrott (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-27 13:24:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179121003 (Comments: 2) | blongeon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, le CIO est un service public qui est hebergé dans le même immeuble que KPMG. Il me paraissait problématique d'indiquer le même code GPS pour un service public et pour un établissement de conseil aux entr... commented 2026-02-27 13:11:47 UTC by blongeon ♦1 |
| 175351112 (Comments: 3) | Donlooba411 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Salut @Donlooba411 ! Merci pour ta réponse. Pas d'accord pour la supprimer d'OSM ! Elle existe et c'est vérifiable : j'y suis retournée et je l'ai trouvée. D'ailleurs ce jeu de piste est tr... commented 2026-02-27 12:58:48 UTC by Patchanka ♦423 |
| 178904310 (Comments: 4) | SteffenBrauer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kein Problem und erst mal herzlich willkommen hier. Ja, Du kannst das selbst auch wieder ändern, also die Tags am alten FwHs löschen und am neuen FwHs eintragen. Wenn Du das dann alles korrekt eingetragen hast, dann kannst Du Deine Hi... commented 2026-02-27 12:58:38 UTC by klik ♦39 |
 | 179130035 (Comments: 1) | Carlos404 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179130035 commented 2026-02-27 12:50:44 UTC by Carlos404 ♦11 |
| 179129997 (Comments: 1) | Carlos404 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179129997 commented 2026-02-27 12:48:47 UTC by Carlos404 ♦11 |
| 178758418 (Comments: 5) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Marc__marc Thank you for your feedback and sharing your knowledge. I am going to restore [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418834283] and [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418834285] and tag them with (was:highway=path) and (description=Po... commented 2026-02-27 12:46:49 UTC by ajmat ♦16 |
| 179129726 (Comments: 1) | Carlos404 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179129726#map=19/6.392602/2.397575 commented 2026-02-27 12:42:06 UTC by Carlos404 ♦11 |
| 179129415 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 430) | Just 1 new roundabout used by 7 routes like the SS16, and long distance flixbuses causing the perverted BBox size. Sorry. commented 2026-02-27 12:34:54 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,471 |
| 176185937 (Comments: 3) | Michael Axlin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Readded. However. I don't understand why it isn't enough with speed on the road. I mean, you don't put speed tags on land next to a big road to cover the case if gps jump...!?! commented 2026-02-27 12:31:13 UTC by YraFyra ♦56 |
| 179129225 (Comments: 1) | allthelead (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-27 12:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179105263 (Comments: 1) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 18) | Havde det ikke været bedre at rulle changesættet helt tilbage? Lige nu står vejen med Google som kilde via image=* commented 2026-02-27 12:16:37 UTC by b-holdet ♦346 |
| 178938800 (Comments: 3) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | In my opinion, all changesets of this contributor should be reverted. commented 2026-02-27 12:16:10 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179128743 (Comments: 1) | Carlos404 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179128743 commented 2026-02-27 12:15:12 UTC by Carlos404 ♦11 |
| 179128678 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 182) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179128728 commented 2026-02-27 12:14:43 UTC by TinPetreković ♦268 |
| 179127930 (Comments: 2) | Boyan Alexiev (Discussed changesets: 30) | Да не е №2? За тази сграда - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117065730, която е от същата страна на дюнерите, но по-нагоре, съм виждал №2А. Май на рекламен на... commented 2026-02-27 12:06:34 UTC by Fraxi ♦274 |
| 179101731 (Comments: 2) | ruof32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:179128376 commented 2026-02-27 12:05:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179076868 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 14) | En général, on fait plutôt building=construction + construction=* dans ce cas-là. commented 2026-02-27 12:02:08 UTC by Ltrlg ♦144 |
| 153034135 (Comments: 2) | joyclem (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bonjour, En effet, je n'ai pas du mettre à jour mes données. Votre proposition me parait être bien, je vous laisse le faire :) commented 2026-02-27 11:57:48 UTC by joyclem ♦14 |
| 179118423 (Comments: 2) | Un tempo per Te (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok thanx I will correct this issue commented 2026-02-27 11:55:36 UTC by Un tempo per Te ♦1 |
| 115071770 (Comments: 2) | Kalepom (Discussed changesets: 70) | Ne sachant pas quoi faire, j'ai juste supprimé le panneau disparu sans toucher aux deux autres. commented 2026-02-27 11:53:02 UTC by Syl ♦1,033 |
| 179124596 (Comments: 1) | volgerr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag volgerr, Alleen access=private is voldoende. Mvg eggie commented 2026-02-27 11:44:51 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179077097 (Comments: 2) | JeremySoudan74 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179127343 commented 2026-02-27 11:41:32 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179127180 (Comments: 1) | ZEN Cakes Miami (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-27 11:39:51 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179119898 (Comments: 2) | Thomas Parrott (Discussed changesets: 3) | How does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483741762 fit in? It makes the changeset spread over two continents. commented 2026-02-27 11:23:56 UTC by 9_tab ♦17 |
| 179117271 (Comments: 1) | Schwarzwald Tourismus - agenturbergwerk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Agentur Bergwerk, die Grundeigentümerin hat sich auch beim FOSSGIS e.V. beschwert. Das Gerichtsurteil kann übrigens unter https://www.landesrecht-bw.de/bsbw/document/NJRE001630549 nachgelesen werden. Ich habe dem Zufahrtsweg wieder ei... commented 2026-02-27 11:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,552 |
| 179119899 (Comments: 1) | SurlyRider (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bei Arbeiten an Gebäudeumrissen in Niedersachen sind mittlerweile die ALKIS-Daten die beste Grundlage. Dort sind die maßgeblichen Außenmauern dargestellt. Damit hätte dann auch dieses Gebäude way/1483741777 am richtigen P... commented 2026-02-27 11:15:21 UTC by Hb- ♦339 |
| 179105012 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi. Die Karten fürs Katasterverzeichnis sind ja auf OSM in den Ebenen abrufbar. Zur Kontrolle gehe ich dann noch auf die Ebene Hesse DOP20 (also Satelittenaufnahme). Grüße zurück. commented 2026-02-27 11:14:05 UTC by matze089 ♦34 |
| 179117407 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well. Regards, Prasanna Devi commented 2026-02-27 11:11:21 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦16 |
| 179089469 (Comments: 1) | connie_lm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, may I ask what "cad data" means as a source? Your geometry tweaks are very off from what is shown on aerial imagery (see the area around the Eagle Centre Substation and Osmaston Road). commented 2026-02-27 11:09:16 UTC by Aethonatic ♦38 |
| 179104581 (Comments: 1) | Yürü Ya Kulum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Eklemek istediğiniz öğeleri yanlış etiketlerle eklemişsiniz. shop=outpost etiketi teslimat noktaları için kullanılıyor. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=outpost historic=monument etiketi de anıtlar i&c... commented 2026-02-27 11:08:25 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦231 |
| 179029023 (Comments: 1) | Apophis67 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo gut, dass Sie bei OSM mitmachen. Die umgangssprachlich genannten Spielstraßen sollten ohne genau Angabe der Vmax gezeichnet werden. Die maximal zulässige Geschwindingkeit ist die Schrittgeschwindigkeit, die ist leider nich... commented 2026-02-27 10:58:40 UTC by Lokai ♦492 |
| 179098470 (Comments: 2) | Kazik_N (Discussed changesets: 4) | Przepraszam za brak opisu źródła. Zacznę je dodawać. W tym przypadku źródłem lokalizacji i wysokości była to Mapa topo 1:10 000 ukł. 65. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=2F8EBC6... commented 2026-02-27 10:49:09 UTC by Kazik_N ♦1 |
| 179080656 (Comments: 5) | Markt Holzkirchen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gerne! Mir fiel noch ein, dass Navis unterschiedliche Update-Intervalle haben. OsmAnd zum Beispiel läd OSM-Daten immer am 1. eines Monats runter, bearbeitet sie und stellt die dann den (normalen, nicht-Abo) Benutzern ein paar Tage spä... commented 2026-02-27 10:34:48 UTC by ToniE ♦1,250 |
| 164273988 (Comments: 1) | riwnodennyk (Discussed changesets: 11) | Теги museum = open_air та museum:type = open_air не мають сенсу без tourism = museum commented 2026-02-27 10:33:36 UTC by mike140 ♦370 |
| 178352229 (Comments: 1) | Masyas (Discussed changesets: 11) | 不要“Tagging for the renderer”，看：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer commented 2026-02-27 10:12:46 UTC by Adventurize ♦9 |
| 179074868 (Comments: 2) | kate_rocketdata (Discussed changesets: 200) | Добрый день! Название исправили, будем иметь ввиду, спасибо! commented 2026-02-27 10:11:37 UTC by kate_rocketdata ♦123 |
| 179123407 (Comments: 1) | wall2wallcleaningservices (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-27 10:09:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179121805 (Comments: 2) | muyrety (Discussed changesets: 3) | I found some on their facebook page, updated commented 2026-02-27 10:01:25 UTC by muyrety ♦1 |
| 178858583 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 14) | Pour ce genre de cas, il est utile d’ajouter landuse=brownfield. commented 2026-02-27 09:59:20 UTC by Ltrlg ♦144 |
| 178742110 (Comments: 3) | DutchMaverick (Discussed changesets: 2) | Top! commented 2026-02-27 09:44:39 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 87448143 (Comments: 2) | AndySchulte (Discussed changesets: 118) | Hi Protoxenus, danke für den Hinweis. ich habe es korrigiert. Gruß Andy commented 2026-02-27 09:43:18 UTC by AndySchulte ♦104 |
| 179116491 (Comments: 3) | smathes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kein Stress. Wenn es nicht drin stände, wäre es auch kein Weltuntergang :joy: Danke für deinen Beitrag hier! Falls du ein wenig mehr Ideen haben möchtest, was man in Fulda machen könnte schau mal im Wiki bei uns... commented 2026-02-27 09:39:37 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦29 |
| 179121927 (Comments: 1) | Valldauramaria (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-27 09:36:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179051213 (Comments: 1) | Domi1504 (Discussed changesets: 1) | wiadomo cos kiedy budowa i czy juz potwierdzone? commented 2026-02-27 09:34:17 UTC by voltairovicz ♦242 |
| 178795709 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 14) | amenity=school (ou education=school) n’implique pas building=*, il faut les deux (changeset/179121826). commented 2026-02-27 09:33:16 UTC by Ltrlg ♦144 |
| 178987794 (Comments: 1) | Chris Brompton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Chris, could you confirm if this really is a drinking water tap? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=drinking_water or should it be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_tap From experience, I woul... commented 2026-02-27 09:30:54 UTC by dzidek23 ♦69 |
| 178852918 (Comments: 3) | chamdam (Discussed changesets: 29) | Oui, les trois branches superflues(*) de la D 56 n'ont pas lieu d'être. (*) dans OSM on ne met des chaussées séparées que si elles le sont physiquement, là c'est de la peinture sur une grand surfac... commented 2026-02-27 09:30:36 UTC by trial ♦1,097 |
| 177618071 (Comments: 3) | JOB34 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Your changeset is not aligned with the current situation of the building (a part was demolished years ago) nor the new pedestrian area I will correct it commented 2026-02-27 09:27:45 UTC by MaxR_6429 ♦25 |
| 179121316 (Comments: 1) | Valldauramaria (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-27 09:24:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178786330 (Comments: 2) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 14) | Oh, j’ai vu l’image sur Panoramax. Corrigé. commented 2026-02-27 09:17:09 UTC by Ltrlg ♦144 |
| 178151097 (Comments: 9) | nono303 (Discussed changesets: 1) | We do not map for the renderer. I am perfectly aware that some OSM data consumers do not render ele-only peaks, but that is no reason for using wrong name-tags. commented 2026-02-27 09:15:44 UTC by kuhni74 ♦424 |
| 178960791 (Comments: 2) | gosgtan (Discussed changesets: 10) | En l'absence de motif, je revert ta modif. commented 2026-02-27 09:07:02 UTC by Arflha ♦30 |
| 144315518 (Comments: 2) | JoseppeO (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ciao, inizialmente avevo fatto così per una coerenza tra i file PDF e quanto mostrato da Google Maps. Effettivamente in ambito urbano è ridondante considerato come vengono mostrati i nomi sulla mappa. Lavorando come autista ti pos... commented 2026-02-27 09:05:51 UTC by JoseppeO ♦3 |
| 178766841 (Comments: 1) | Jeff_49 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci ! commented 2026-02-27 09:05:25 UTC by Ltrlg ♦144 |
| 178244873 (Comments: 2) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 203) | Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. Ist wieder hergestellt. commented 2026-02-27 09:03:38 UTC by Ropino ♦408 |
| 177299668 (Comments: 2) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 203) | Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. Ist wieder hergestellt. commented 2026-02-27 09:03:19 UTC by Ropino ♦408 |
| 179118043 (Comments: 1) | Jaxxnes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Strakke actie. Dat zal zeker helpen. Ik heb wel adresnode Prins Bernhardstraat 1 teruggeplaatst. Je edits htt... commented 2026-02-27 08:53:11 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 176670155 (Comments: 2) | onterof (Discussed changesets: 7) | Danke! commented 2026-02-27 08:52:27 UTC by onterof ♦18 |
| 178958250 (Comments: 3) | Nathan Runyan (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nathan%20Runyan is there a sign that says 15 mph here? If not, do you know if it was previously a 15-mph zone, i.e. why was it tagged as 15 mph? Please let me know! commented 2026-02-27 08:52:05 UTC by pwbriggs ♦170 |
| 162447699 (Comments: 3) | Stephen Males (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ah, cool, I thought that may be the case. Thanks for clarifying. I take it that the flats are addressed to the laneways? If that's the case, I would probably support tagging the laneways as highway=living_street. FYI, This tag has a specific def... commented 2026-02-27 08:51:00 UTC by radiotrefoil ♦120 |
| 179114899 (Comments: 1) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 171) | Is it not `trail_visibility=no` , `disused=yes` , `abandoned:highway=` , or scrambling? commented 2026-02-27 08:40:33 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 179068990 (Comments: 3) | mat (Discussed changesets: 33) | Marc, ça marche aussi avec JOSM, mais peut-être tu as essayė de trouver l'erreur quand l'erreur était déjà corrigée ? Toni commented 2026-02-27 08:40:16 UTC by ToniE ♦1,250 |
| 177518281 (Comments: 1) | Metauro (Discussed changesets: 7) | Restoring construction status. It appears the changeset transitioned this bridge to a standard highway without the benefit of local knowledge or ground truth. Unfortunately, this led to immediate routing issues and safety concerns. I have reapplied t... commented 2026-02-27 08:39:44 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179097949 (Comments: 1) | C'est chic hairbeauty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buongiorno, ha aggiunto questo punto con solo il nome ma senza specificare di che tipo di attività o cosa sia, dal nome suppongo un parrucchiere però avrei bisogno di una sua conferma. Può anche specificare se il target clienti &... commented 2026-02-27 08:36:17 UTC by George Sears ♦81 |
| 179106342 (Comments: 2) | JackArock (Discussed changesets: 9) | Het laatste stukje heb ik aangepast naar path .. informal=yes Het zal vast niet de bedoeling zijn dat hier regulier autoverkeer overgaat. tracktype=grade5 toegevoegd surface=ground commented 2026-02-27 08:36:04 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179092571 (Comments: 1) | stone666 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't upload personal test edits. This is considered vandalism. commented 2026-02-27 08:30:22 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
 | 169189803 (Comments: 2) | yum091 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Uh, yes, seems I forgot to remove the abandoned tag... commented 2026-02-27 08:29:40 UTC by yum091 ♦2 |
| 179073252 (Comments: 1) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Should use `=busway` (despite Carto not rendering) commented 2026-02-27 08:29:38 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 179047142 (Comments: 3) | JWenWa (Discussed changesets: 3) | I added this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179118819, could you look over those changes to endure they look correct? Thanks! commented 2026-02-27 08:25:02 UTC by pwbriggs ♦170 |
| 179095262 (Comments: 1) | Barbearia Sa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-02-27 08:24:53 UTC by Comino ♦313 |
| 179101958 (Comments: 3) | AlbertCohen (Discussed changesets: 5) | nein, es sollte wieder alles korrigiert sein commented 2026-02-27 08:20:49 UTC by Luzandro ♦984 |
| 179079349 (Comments: 1) | QuintenP (Discussed changesets: 3) | Even ter info, in Nederland worden alle adressen geimporteerd uit de BAG als node. Daarom is er besloten om adressen niet op de gebouwen zelf te zetten. Ik zal het dubbele adres weer verwijderen. Groetjes Wanderer commented 2026-02-27 08:05:35 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦53 |
| 179092117 (Comments: 1) | Jancini (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Jancine, Realiseer je wel dat bezorgdiensten die ook op OSM navigeren nu niet routeren. Vaak wordt op die toegangswegen de tag access=permissive gebruikt ipv private. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-27 08:05:32 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179090635 (Comments: 1) | Jancini (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback noexit=yes heb ik verwijderd. Dat klopt niet als er een vervolg is. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community <... commented 2026-02-27 08:03:10 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179092240 (Comments: 1) | Marly_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-27 08:00:38 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 169953016 (Comments: 1) | macdale (Discussed changesets: 60) | Neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419960381 commented 2026-02-27 08:00:18 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 169503091 (Comments: 1) | macdale (Discussed changesets: 60) | Neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417529273 commented 2026-02-27 07:56:03 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 179107624 (Comments: 1) | GYMPODS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I've removed the leisure=fitness_centre tag from the building as it's main use is apartments. You are correct to place the fitness_centre POI within the building outline, as it's one of the building's many uses. Regards... commented 2026-02-27 07:54:48 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,105 |
| 168145470 (Comments: 1) | misko903 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Zdravím na Bingu nevidím žiadne z týchto ciest https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1409784113; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1409784112; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429407054 Ste si istý, že sú na ... commented 2026-02-27 07:54:32 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 173769486 (Comments: 2) | segi (Discussed changesets: 28) | opravené commented 2026-02-27 07:50:47 UTC by segi ♦41 |
| 170389349 (Comments: 2) | segi (Discussed changesets: 28) | opravené commented 2026-02-27 07:49:54 UTC by segi ♦41 |
| 179107492 (Comments: 3) | GYMPODS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks Bernard commented 2026-02-27 07:49:54 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179116518 (Comments: 1) | JMGonk (Discussed changesets: 6) | Note on Obj3cts: it is really hard to categorize. They sell apothecaries, baked goods, books, coffee, flowers, and various gift type things. From the street the first impression is of a cafe. commented 2026-02-27 07:21:05 UTC by JMGonk ♦6 |
 | 179088801 (Comments: 1) | Fmj1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id:179115524 commented 2026-02-27 07:09:56 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179110167 (Comments: 1) | Rizkiibal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Halo, selamat datang di OSM. Untuk cara memetakan yang benar, silakan ikuti tutorial interaktifnya, ya! commented 2026-02-27 06:51:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179089745 (Comments: 5) | Pentaonia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dankeschön für die Korrektur. Viele Grüße commented 2026-02-27 06:47:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179088996 (Comments: 1) | Fmj1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id:179115370 commented 2026-02-27 06:42:14 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 159669585 (Comments: 2) | Volker74 (Discussed changesets: 3) | It's a long time ago that I was there. If I remember correctly, it is a private area now. commented 2026-02-27 06:24:07 UTC by Volker74 ♦1 |
| 179073269 (Comments: 5) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 123) | Danke. Schönen sonnigen Tag draußen. commented 2026-02-27 06:23:40 UTC by george1201 ♦282 |
| 179114130 (Comments: 2) | FlockH8R (Discussed changesets: 1) | I screwed this up inadvertently when trying to scroll, I can't find how to revert it, sorry! commented 2026-02-27 06:09:53 UTC by FlockH8R ♦1 |
| 178970690 (Comments: 2) | mainstreetdentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:179114209 , 179114339 commented 2026-02-27 06:09:33 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
 | 179012085 (Comments: 1) | AlejandroR27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:179113688 commented 2026-02-27 05:39:17 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179087328 (Comments: 1) | 树栎_tttsp (Discussed changesets: 1) | 货运火车站请勿使用public_transport=station commented 2026-02-27 05:34:04 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦38 |
| 178751741 (Comments: 2) | MTZELY (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178805281 commented 2026-02-27 05:33:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178748882 (Comments: 2) | rovmont (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178791609 commented 2026-02-27 05:33:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178748014 (Comments: 2) | Oregon Photo Booth Rental Company (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179113581 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here. commented 2026-02-27 05:33:18 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178749053 (Comments: 2) | aussiehybridsolar (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178802061 commented 2026-02-27 05:33:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178746157 (Comments: 2) | 500370708 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113578 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178746369 (Comments: 2) | 500383561 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113579 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178743855 (Comments: 2) | 500378139 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113576 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178742273 (Comments: 2) | Chilly's Discount Liquor (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113575 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178741850 (Comments: 2) | 500371772 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113574 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178741705 (Comments: 2) | 15435955 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113573 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178739617 (Comments: 2) | TODAY TRAVEL (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113572 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178739084 (Comments: 2) | 500373829 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113571 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178738886 (Comments: 2) | 500365740 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113570 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178738700 (Comments: 2) | 15012802 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113569 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-27 05:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178738205 (Comments: 2) | Patti McMullan Puyallup (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178739150 commented 2026-02-27 05:33:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178980160 (Comments: 1) | Thomabre (Discussed changesets: 6) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179113382 commented 2026-02-27 05:25:50 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179112947 (Comments: 1) | austinroofingandsheetmetal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-27 05:09:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179112743 (Comments: 1) | Leo Lapuerta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-27 05:03:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178988333 (Comments: 1) | edaasd (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset id:179112766 commented 2026-02-27 05:02:27 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179105274 (Comments: 2) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 49) | Also, please respond when other mappers and I comment on any of your changesets asking about your map edits. I left comments on a number of your changesets asking about your map edits, and you have not responded to them. It is crucial that you respon... commented 2026-02-27 04:36:02 UTC by Frank Peng ♦170 |
| 179047616 (Comments: 1) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 166) | Revert of 179002731 commented 2026-02-27 04:31:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 177277365 (Comments: 4) | Beager (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for the clarification! commented 2026-02-27 04:20:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,822 |
| 149202761 (Comments: 2) | Caleb NHVR (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hey Bob, thank you for your message. The changeset only intended to introduce bridge structures (only bridge=yes). I believe the speed limit tags were a legacy of a previous iteration of Gwydir Highway, and the ways I created are v1 as I split the hi... commented 2026-02-27 04:01:29 UTC by Caleb NHVR ♦14 |
| 151704466 (Comments: 1) | CloudbaseGlider (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I have been adding gliding clubs to OSM. To 'conform' to OSM tags .. I have removed 'clubhouse' from the name of one of the buildings and added tags for club, sport and website. The aim is to make them all searc... commented 2026-02-27 03:57:55 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,748 |
| 179059643 (Comments: 5) | talbertdoi (Discussed changesets: 1) | IshikawaJunさん お疲れさまです。 ご対応ありがとうございます。 こちらでも状況を確認しました。問題ありません。 お手数おかけしました。 commented 2026-02-27 03:43:49 UTC by あじさか ♦15 |
| 179016988 (Comments: 1) | 米沙商店 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте, локальный язык следует добавить в тег "name" (name:zh). commented 2026-02-27 03:07:27 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 178980159 (Comments: 1) | 米沙商店 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте, локальный язык следует добавить в тег "name" (name:zh). commented 2026-02-27 03:03:53 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 178876575 (Comments: 3) | CzechAddress (Discussed changesets: 7) | Autocorrection :) commented 2026-02-27 01:53:53 UTC by CzechAddress ♦2 |
| 179059302 (Comments: 3) | 022 (Discussed changesets: 14) | This issue was resolved with changeset #179110019. commented 2026-02-27 01:47:34 UTC by 022 ♦29 |
| 179009848 (Comments: 6) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Unfortunately as for now these images that I shared are the only evidence that I have regarding possible construction, so I can hardly identify the geometry, extension and nature of it. Best regards, Oscar Medinilla commented 2026-02-27 01:33:10 UTC by oscarm_lyft ♦3 |
 | 179084342 (Comments: 1) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 102) | Saludos Los Nombres Oficiales (INE) NO INCLUYEN TILDES. Si quieres agregar tildes esta muy bien pero NO quitando el nombre sin Tildes, osea quedaria con las etiquetas name=XXXX y alt_name=XXXX Gracias commented 2026-02-27 01:28:50 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,233 |
| 22546448 (Comments: 2) | chrsmsk (Discussed changesets: 20) | nein, doch nicht, Görings Hütte wurde hier 1934 neu gebaut, sh. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B6th commented 2026-02-27 01:23:39 UTC by kuhni74 ♦424 |
| 9684282 (Comments: 1) | Walter Schlögl (Discussed changesets: 70) | dieser Name kann nur ein Verortungsfehler im Franz.Kat. sein, der aus der ÖK50 zurecht gelöscht wurde, der Selbhorn-Gipfel ist weiter südlich, ein zusätzliches Silbhorn ist nahezu auszuschließen commented 2026-02-27 00:57:30 UTC by kuhni74 ♦424 |
| 179059953 (Comments: 1) | TAPCOcu (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you acidentally dragged a node for overhead power lines. It has been fixed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179059953 commented 2026-02-27 00:41:51 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 178482938 (Comments: 2) | Heiler2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola parte de nuestra quebrada la cantera se encuentra bajo las casas soló se alcanza a ver en algunos sectores en su trayecto. commented 2026-02-27 00:40:51 UTC by Heiler2026 ♦1 |
| 173070270 (Comments: 2) | NuSarnia_Demetrius (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have requested help cleaning up this import in a thread on the community forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/help-with-cleaning-up-import-in-sarnia/141866 commented 2026-02-27 00:04:13 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦364 |
| 177812201 (Comments: 1) | Rego98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hát, Kétegyháza telje4sen szét lett kutyulva. Köszi. commented 2026-02-26 23:42:05 UTC by balint36 ♦227 |
| 154955795 (Comments: 2) | Lars_TheViking (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello Erick Araujo, It looks like you are referring to the highway=construction road segments that were present at around -23.0039883, -43.3199413 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-23.004186/-43.320171&layers=N), and I see that you h... commented 2026-02-26 23:38:40 UTC by Lars_TheViking ♦16 |
| 168867389 (Comments: 7) | Filip009 (Discussed changesets: 68) | Tak som to teda zaktualizoval podla tych stranok, aj so zeleznicou v budove. Dakujem za informacie. commented 2026-02-26 23:31:44 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,803 |
| 178951923 (Comments: 2) | C-Team605 (Discussed changesets: 4) | På kortoverblik.dk kan der vises et kort over området. Har zoommet ind og valgt "Vejnavn mindre". https://kortoverblik.dk/spatialmap?mapheight=772&mapwidth=1231&label=&ignorefavorite=true&profile=sdfik... commented 2026-02-26 23:10:40 UTC by Jørn-osm ♦78 |
| 179107634 (Comments: 1) | refocus536 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 23:09:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179106672 (Comments: 3) | superoci (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke.. duidelijk.. commented 2026-02-26 23:09:32 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178954402 (Comments: 2) | molensteen (Discussed changesets: 35) | dank voor de tip eggie commented 2026-02-26 22:52:06 UTC by molensteen ♦33 |
| 179030599 (Comments: 9) | Hopla57 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hopla, c'est fait ! commented 2026-02-26 22:49:08 UTC by Hopla57 ♦59 |
| 179107157 (Comments: 1) | 500385075 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 22:48:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 178920476 (Comments: 1) | NuevaG-Digital (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola NuevaG-Digital. Muchas gracias por tus contribuciones, te saluda Porfirio Páiz. ¿Me gustaría confirmar si la estructura que estaba representada por estos elementos ha sido demolida y no existe más? ya qu... commented 2026-02-26 22:48:20 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦127 |
| 178920493 (Comments: 1) | NuevaG-Digital (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola NuevaG-Digital. Muchas gracias por tus contribuciones, te saluda Porfirio Páiz. ¿Me gustaría confirmar si la estructura que estaba representada por estos elementos ha sido demolida y no existe más? ya qu... commented 2026-02-26 22:47:23 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦127 |
| 179106110 (Comments: 1) | ch100 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, building=detached has about 8x more usage than house=detached in Australia, it's probably better to stick with that vs building=house and house=detached. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2026-02-26 22:43:54 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,486 |
| 179107042 (Comments: 1) | 500385073 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 22:42:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 179106767 (Comments: 1) | Mayuri008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good commented 2026-02-26 22:40:33 UTC by Mayuri008 ♦1 |
| 179106906 (Comments: 1) | 500384876 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 22:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179106776 (Comments: 1) | 15171819 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 22:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179106498 (Comments: 1) | 500384989 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 22:21:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179106335 (Comments: 1) | 500385040 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 22:18:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179105941 (Comments: 1) | 500373789 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 22:03:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179016351 (Comments: 1) | Helen Mei (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Helen Mei, First of all, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Welcome to our community! I noticed that in this changeset, you created a "direction sign" with the following tags: name=direction sign place=haml... commented 2026-02-26 21:58:41 UTC by jacobwhall ♦47 |
| 179105828 (Comments: 1) | SP-open-all (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 21:57:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179095164 (Comments: 2) | pkoby (Discussed changesets: 55) | I added a tag for name pronunciation to the Schuylkill River relation. The changeset covers the whole river. commented 2026-02-26 21:57:14 UTC by pkoby ♦119 |
| 179105784 (Comments: 1) | dlegg73 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite. commented 2026-02-26 21:54:41 UTC by dlegg73 ♦12 |
| 167976934 (Comments: 4) | PluMGMK (Discussed changesets: 17) | Interesting, thanks! I had noticed that there was lovely new Mapbox imagery for Cork a while back, but I don't think it had occurred to me to look for this on it… I'll have a look! commented 2026-02-26 21:47:07 UTC by PluMGMK ♦16 |
| 179018095 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_CartoVeil (Discussed changesets: 1) | please modify areas closer in proximity, so the bounding box does not affect the entire state commented 2026-02-26 21:44:11 UTC by dmjab13 ♦84 |
| 176962131 (Comments: 3) | NXN (Discussed changesets: 10) | Chodzi o to, że noexit=yes nie blokuje przejazdu, to tylko informacja, że droga nie ma kontynuacji dla walidatorów/mapujących i trzeba to zastąpić bramą, albo urwać w tym miejscu drogę i wtedy na końcówkach węzłów dać... commented 2026-02-26 21:38:32 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,217 |
| 179103864 (Comments: 2) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 18) | Har rettet det tilbage for at undgå evt. licensbøvl fra google maps: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179105263 commented 2026-02-26 21:37:16 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦30 |
| 177538991 (Comments: 1) | Olaf56807R2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:31:56 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 177443767 (Comments: 1) | Olaf56807R2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:31:49 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 177652827 (Comments: 1) | Olaf56807R2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:31:37 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179054864 (Comments: 1) | Olaf56807R2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:31:24 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179054935 (Comments: 1) | Olaf56807R2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:31:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179093921 (Comments: 1) | Olaf56807R2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:31:04 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179064837 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_GeoRelay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please try to keep changesets somewhat geographically consistent, this changeset has minor changes in York, PA, as well as unrelated changes in Raleigh, NC, leading to an unnecessarily large bounding box. commented 2026-02-26 21:30:25 UTC by ItsAlyx ♦4 |
| 179096043 (Comments: 1) | Yanek_33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:30:03 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179104891 (Comments: 1) | Rafael Migoto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 21:27:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 166147442 (Comments: 3) | StrikeMind (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the quick response! Looks good to me. That tag will just make it clear to other mappers that it's really demolished while still shown on most aerial imagery. The feature can be removed entirely once most aerial imagery services are up... commented 2026-02-26 21:26:52 UTC by jandar22 ♦35 |
| 178917259 (Comments: 1) | Edawyt3425 (Discussed changesets: 21) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:26:38 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179104946 (Comments: 1) | Carlos404 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179104946#map=19/6.386093/2.313873 commented 2026-02-26 21:26:26 UTC by Carlos404 ♦11 |
| 179048118 (Comments: 1) | Edawyt3425 (Discussed changesets: 21) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:26:21 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 179096360 (Comments: 1) | Edawyt3425 (Discussed changesets: 21) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-02-26 21:26:13 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 169653662 (Comments: 7) | tnsuarez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Perfect! Thank you! And for real, OSM is goated haha commented 2026-02-26 21:19:21 UTC by tnsuarez ♦1 |
| 179104680 (Comments: 1) | Carlos404 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179104680#map=19/6.418979/2.340073 commented 2026-02-26 21:18:22 UTC by Carlos404 ♦11 |
| 179104474 (Comments: 1) | Teletaxis Ponferrada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 21:15:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179104448 (Comments: 1) | Carlos404 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179104448#map=19/6.392602/2.397575 commented 2026-02-26 21:11:00 UTC by Carlos404 ♦11 |
| 179103620 (Comments: 1) | robibrojek (Discussed changesets: 23) | Cześć, tagu service i name nie używamy w ten sposób. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:service?uselang=pl https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2026-02-26 21:10:00 UTC by stasiu512 ♦266 |
| 179104108 (Comments: 1) | Carlos404 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179104108#map=19/6.386093/2.313873 commented 2026-02-26 21:01:40 UTC by Carlos404 ♦11 |
| 179083219 (Comments: 1) | adriensd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour la précision de l'école et l'ajout de l'arbre J'ai retiré la plupart des attributs sur le cabanon de jardin dans le changeset 179103693 commented 2026-02-26 20:51:39 UTC by Mevess ♦88 |
| 178822227 (Comments: 5) | silly_goose (Discussed changesets: 8) | Should be fixed. I'm very sorry for the inconvenience; thanks for the comment! :) commented 2026-02-26 20:45:15 UTC by silly_goose ♦8 |
| 179101371 (Comments: 1) | ovaryaction (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello ovaryaction Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards. Please refer to the following wiki page that focuses on deletions of trails but is applicable in this case. https://wiki.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-02-26 20:44:38 UTC by eerib ♦238 |
| 179101305 (Comments: 1) | ovaryaction (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello ovaryaction Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards. Please refer to the following wiki page that focuses on deletions of trails but is applicable in this case. https://wiki.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-02-26 20:44:37 UTC by eerib ♦238 |
| 179057872 (Comments: 2) | Antonio Eugenio Burriel (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hola aTamrom, muchas gracias por la corrección, no sé cómo se me ha colado esa etiqueta. commented 2026-02-26 20:35:58 UTC by Antonio Eugenio Burriel ♦33 |
| 175580887 (Comments: 2) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hallo Hb-, gut möglich, dass sich die Punkte versehentlich am Anpassen der landuses eingeschlichen haben. Danke für die bereits erfolgte Korrektur. commented 2026-02-26 20:31:20 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦65 |
| 179102733 (Comments: 1) | 500372164 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 20:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179101993 (Comments: 1) | TheUKHighStreet (Discussed changesets: 22) | Meant to link to the note. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4776532 commented 2026-02-26 19:59:32 UTC by TheUKHighStreet ♦21 |
| 179097772 (Comments: 3) | Martin Kra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your reply. commented 2026-02-26 19:57:48 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 177887189 (Comments: 1) | Денис400 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Пожалуйста, не рисуйте фиктивные дороги. Добавляйте сами остановки или рисуйте полигоны дорог. Но не имитируйте дороги линиями https://w... commented 2026-02-26 19:55:27 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 179097464 (Comments: 2) | Znaika (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hallo. Ha, es ist mir wieder irgendwie passiert. Danke. VG commented 2026-02-26 19:39:34 UTC by Znaika ♦162 |
| 179051758 (Comments: 1) | Znaika (Discussed changesets: 40) | Und auch hier: keine Anmerkungen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-02-26 19:32:48 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,366 |
| 179100575 (Comments: 1) | xisto_04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 19:21:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178319697 (Comments: 2) | Calasanz (Discussed changesets: 10) | Añado que ni la Ley de Comarcalización de Aragón (https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOA-d-2006-90038) ni la de creación de la comarca de La Ribagorza (https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2002-11910) afirman nada ... commented 2026-02-26 19:18:13 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,751 |
| 179082189 (Comments: 1) | Calasanz (Discussed changesets: 10) | Como ya se ha explicado otras veces, los municipios de La Franja toman su nombre de las leyes de comarcalización. En este caso, se toma como buena la denomianción "Puente de Montañana / Pont de Montanyana" según ... commented 2026-02-26 19:06:56 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,751 |
| 178874905 (Comments: 1) | Saratov209 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-02-26 19:06:55 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 179099661 (Comments: 1) | Jorge H Araujo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 18:57:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179071454 (Comments: 1) | seopinnacleagency (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you! :) commented 2026-02-26 18:56:17 UTC by rhhs ♦203 |
| 179099344 (Comments: 1) | Shawn Brubacher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 18:51:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177509158 (Comments: 1) | dddokokio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179099069 commented 2026-02-26 18:39:14 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 59844227 (Comments: 1) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 173) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8381821 Apologies, an old edit. :) Could I check what guid=27 means? It's an exceptionally rare tag. commented 2026-02-26 18:36:53 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,028 |
| 179092523 (Comments: 2) | fndoder (Discussed changesets: 15) | Я уже несколько раз сталкивался с тем, что стираю снесенные дома, а другие пользователи используют старые снимки и мапят их заново. П... commented 2026-02-26 18:33:20 UTC by fndoder ♦114 |
| 177903712 (Comments: 1) | asdfyxcv0104 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo asdfyxcv0104, willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithilfst die OSM-Daten aktuell zu halten. In diesem Fall hat das leider nur halb geklappt, denn du hast das Café Cade doppelt angelegt, vermutlich als du die Öffnu... commented 2026-02-26 18:30:09 UTC by Rainero ♦609 |
| 178960079 (Comments: 2) | GeoConor (Discussed changesets: 6) | Cool. I can't remember if I had created these custom or picked the tags! Will I remove the special characters? :-) C. commented 2026-02-26 18:29:27 UTC by GeoConor ♦2 |
| 179088051 (Comments: 1) | gpx4me (Discussed changesets: 1) | Geschlossene Restaurants werden normalerweise nicht gelöscht sondern zu disused:amenity=restaurant old_name=* geändert, so dass die Historie erhalten bleibt. Wenn dann ein neues Restaurant einzieht kann der Node weiterverwendet we... commented 2026-02-26 18:27:01 UTC by martinst ♦352 |
| 179098308 (Comments: 1) | João Pedro Bandeira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 18:24:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179098121 (Comments: 1) | Lorenzo Fraga (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 18:21:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179048902 (Comments: 5) | NetzerDoron (Discussed changesets: 1) | תודה רבה! הרוב תקין עכשיו. כמה הערות המשך: א. שכחת את ה-note עבור https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482952791 . ה-note מכיל מידע מיפוי ולא מידע לצרכן ב. לשיקו... commented 2026-02-26 18:18:17 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦715 |
| 179092371 (Comments: 2) | Pioneertown Mountains Preserve (Discussed changesets: 1) | Deletion reverted. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for an explanation. If the trail is unmaintained but does exist then it needs to remain on the map; any dangers or other characteristics should be re... commented 2026-02-26 18:17:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,552 |
| 162531479 (Comments: 1) | ti_rey_531 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo ti_rey, Du hast hier nach einem veralteten Luftbild die Kiesgrube bei Widdershausen verschlimmbessert, und die Attribute ohne Überprüfung vor Ort geändert. Der von mir dort als landfill getagge Teil ist eine Deponie fü... commented 2026-02-26 18:16:24 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦91 |
| 179091192 (Comments: 1) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 49) | De correcte manier om de laatste zaterdag van de maand aan te geven is Sa[-1], zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=nl#Summary_syntax Ik heb het verbeterd. commented 2026-02-26 18:04:36 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,093 |
| 178798203 (Comments: 2) | GatunLake (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi jptolosa, Thank you for reaching out, I agree with you and will change this back commented 2026-02-26 17:53:18 UTC by GatunLake ♦3 |
 | 178576703 (Comments: 5) | andi9876 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hello andi9876, I appreciate your openness to community feedback, I am working on communicating with some local mappers and will get back to you regarding their perspectives on the matter. Hope you have a nice day! commented 2026-02-26 17:50:34 UTC by aaronq227 ♦27 |
| 172335826 (Comments: 1) | Momo-Maurice(CD84) (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour Momo-Maurice(CD84), Je viens de voir que cette piste cyclable est en travaux. Pour éviter toute confusion (not. pour les calculateurs d'itinéraires), il est conseillé de mettre highway=construction puis constr... commented 2026-02-26 17:50:11 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦21 |
| 179025042 (Comments: 5) | teodordt (Discussed changesets: 1) | I see that but this information is already marked in two different ways. There is no need to have it marked a third way which is why I suggest to just leave it unnamed. commented 2026-02-26 17:47:14 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦815 |
| 178732002 (Comments: 2) | pgjp17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178763598 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:25 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178720433 (Comments: 2) | 6simplex Butler (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178753889 https://osm.org/changeset/178766637 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:25 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178712622 (Comments: 2) | قطعات الکترو موتور افتخاری (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178759216 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:25 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178735683 (Comments: 2) | 500377320 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095514 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178735151 (Comments: 2) | 500379368 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095512 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178732782 (Comments: 2) | Kentucky Customs & Upfitting (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095507 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178733270 (Comments: 2) | Dripping Diamonds (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095510 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178732983 (Comments: 2) | 500381613 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095508 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178731414 (Comments: 2) | HAUBOLD Fahrrad & Service (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095503 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:21 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178731922 (Comments: 2) | 500314830 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095505 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:21 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178730888 (Comments: 2) | Ninja Physio (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095502 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178730285 (Comments: 2) | ASouleimani (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178734624 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178728715 (Comments: 2) | Integrity Comfort Solutions (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095495 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178724637 (Comments: 2) | Önder Nakliyat ve Depolama (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095492 (Delete all added tags) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178721645 (Comments: 2) | lawscustomhomesconstruction (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178728301 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178721113 (Comments: 2) | coakleylaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178982419 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178719820 (Comments: 2) | Vibora-Padel-Club-Oman (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178720671 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178716499 (Comments: 2) | naturesedgetherapy (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095491 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178715877 (Comments: 2) | Graveur am Schillerhaus (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095488 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178715112 (Comments: 2) | Hirschi Iron (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178734088 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178712500 (Comments: 2) | Tanzanian Pioneers (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178713956 commented 2026-02-26 17:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178712058 (Comments: 2) | LAKE TOUR SVITAVA (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095481 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 17:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
 | 178416863 (Comments: 5) | joserrg12 (Discussed changesets: 2480) | I had an additional thought regarding this. Since construction is currently on hold and there are broken trunk segments along Corredor Norte between way 1473718363 and way 1454813047, the road does not currently function as a high-performance, state ... commented 2026-02-26 17:32:01 UTC by LakeTana ♦10 |
| 178998277 (Comments: 2) | BakoyeRiver (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Rarad74, thank you for your input, Upon further review, this does align with GPX tracks, as well as imageries such as Mapbox that align with the tracks. I will be more mindful of this moving forward. commented 2026-02-26 17:23:40 UTC by BakoyeRiver ♦4 |
| 178636590 (Comments: 1) | cvwilson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your edit cvwilson. However I've reverted this deletion – I think you may have misunderstood the purpose of mapping "under construction" elements. The deleted ways were tagged with construction elements, e.g. hi... commented 2026-02-26 17:16:39 UTC by LateNightTone ♦66 |
| 179094241 (Comments: 1) | Putnam Plumbing Plumbers in St George Utah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 17:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177908129 (Comments: 4) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 463) | I opis zestawu zmian nic nie mówi o likwidacji sklepu commented 2026-02-26 17:05:47 UTC by olo81 ♦709 |
| 177983387 (Comments: 1) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Bala Cynwyd has been placed at the nexus of the universe! commented 2026-02-26 17:03:45 UTC by I-76 ♦55 |
| 179093502 (Comments: 1) | NEOHF101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 17:00:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179067493 (Comments: 1) | lawose (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's a good idea to include the street names on sidewalks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179067493 commented 2026-02-26 16:56:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,369 |
| 178886169 (Comments: 1) | LackyKL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. А почему не смещаете (не выравниваете) снимок подложки под уже имеющиеся данные? Вы только ухудшаете данные недостоверным ... commented 2026-02-26 16:54:21 UTC by Stalker61 ♦307 |
| 135687947 (Comments: 5) | stadt-Due-Lengsfeld (Discussed changesets: 4) | Vor Ort verlaufen Neanderlandsteig und Düsseldorfer Weg über diesen Pfad (außerdem eine alte ehemalige Wandermarkierung mit Kreis erkennbar), auch kein informeller Trampelpfad, da nördlich eine extra genaue Treppe hinunterfü... commented 2026-02-26 16:36:57 UTC by Hmmbeere ♦2 |
| 176165460 (Comments: 5) | Vmosnokia31 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you, I'll look into in. commented 2026-02-26 16:30:37 UTC by Vmosnokia31 ♦4 |
| 179085270 (Comments: 3) | ikheetpieter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke.. maar ik bedoel eigenlijk dat hgv=no op het wegdeel hoort en niet op de man_made=bridge Gr eggie commented 2026-02-26 16:30:08 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179034222 (Comments: 4) | Langenselbolder (Discussed changesets: 2) | Alles OK. Der Kollege https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/maybeyes hatte es schon bereinigt. Viele Grüße commented 2026-02-26 16:25:12 UTC by surveyor54 ♦668 |
| 179079502 (Comments: 1) | hecktor (Discussed changesets: 32) | Offensichtlich falsch verschobene landuse Fläche in folgendem Changeset wieder korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179092124 commented 2026-02-26 16:24:47 UTC by Piz Pachific ♦95 |
| 179091905 (Comments: 1) | bmerino (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 16:21:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179088451 (Comments: 1) | MKristof1121 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en! Házszámoknál nem szoktunk pontot rakni, elég a szám. Viszont itt nincs szükség címre, egy térnek nincs pontos címe, csak egy neve. Tov&aa... commented 2026-02-26 15:56:59 UTC by qstep ♦45 |
| 179077922 (Comments: 1) | lisanouri (Discussed changesets: 11) | De nuevo revierto cambios ver https://t.me/osmcat/71868 no consigo contactar con el usuario commented 2026-02-26 15:50:48 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 170924294 (Comments: 24) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 463) | Trudno było coś poprawić co się zjebało skoro dostałem bana po zgłoszeniu przez olo i nie miałem możliwości edycji. commented 2026-02-26 15:46:40 UTC by C2oc4 ♦215 |
| 118655578 (Comments: 2) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 463) | Nie, już usunięto commented 2026-02-26 15:44:18 UTC by C2oc4 ♦215 |
| 179090305 (Comments: 1) | bcails (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 15:42:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179090088 (Comments: 1) | Oakley's Wine Bar & Bistro (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 15:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 175262952 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 463) | Dobrze. commented 2026-02-26 15:39:41 UTC by C2oc4 ♦215 |
| 179089475 (Comments: 1) | Vermont Hire (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 15:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 158986731 (Comments: 2) | kaartense (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello Erick Araujo, Thank you for reaching out. I'm aware of the past discussions and the back and forth regarding the use of the highway=busway tag. At some point, it was decided to stop using it because it was not (and still is n... commented 2026-02-26 15:23:19 UTC by kaartense ♦16 |
| 178989615 (Comments: 2) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi. I tried to revert this changeset >8400 objects. Were already removed by another mapper. So this is cleared. Best regards commented 2026-02-26 15:21:24 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 177586463 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello Wey2go, We noticed that the 'oneway' tag was recently applied. Could you please let us know the reason for selecting this tag? We want to make sure it wasn't applied accidentally. Way id: w261518711 Thank you in advance for... commented 2026-02-26 15:16:38 UTC by Sergei Amuzinski ♦3 |
| 173513135 (Comments: 1) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 114) | I have fixed various mistakes introduced by these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179089114 commented 2026-02-26 15:12:21 UTC by tomhukins ♦261 |
| 178605215 (Comments: 3) | 5m4u9 (Discussed changesets: 112) | Thanks for the discussion, I went ahead and reclassified Antofagasta Ave. to trunk and added hgv=no in this changeset(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178605215), as well as reclassifying the designated truck route to secondary and addi... commented 2026-02-26 15:06:19 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦84 |
| 133952481 (Comments: 1) | jejo mo (Discussed changesets: 15) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5180615 ? Colours are quite surprising here commented 2026-02-26 14:54:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 171575557 (Comments: 1) | Hervé TUC (Discussed changesets: 36) | Bonjour Hervé TUC, Ici je vois que tu as changé en bande cyclable : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275443654/history#map=18/43.955542/4.798622 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002564318/history#map=19/43.957862/4.8048... commented 2026-02-26 14:53:17 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦21 |
| 178929802 (Comments: 3) | sbachinin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, some just have a "area=yes", but not a building tag. You can add some descriptions, but better use a common tag. Either "note", if it is information for mappers, or "description" if it might also be useful for ... commented 2026-02-26 14:45:17 UTC by mueschel ♦6,938 |
| 178980392 (Comments: 5) | d0vak1n (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja l'elimino jo, però en principi sí que hauries de tenir permisos: tothom pot afegir, modificar i eliminar coses. commented 2026-02-26 14:34:43 UTC by Jo sóc jo ♦5 |
| 179087533 (Comments: 1) | 500384516 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 14:33:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178971112 (Comments: 1) | Kec_Bongas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Boleh dijelaskan arti Blok Kibuyut? Apakah ini semacam RW? commented 2026-02-26 14:22:36 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179022937 (Comments: 1) | Prokilm RW06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Halo, selamat datang di OSM. Untuk penambahan dan perubahan data di OSM, dilarang ada data pribadi seseorang seperti nama pemilik rumah. commented 2026-02-26 14:20:13 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 143813780 (Comments: 2) | Zverik (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hey Gregor, thanks for correcting me! I've removed the childcare: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11335476972 commented 2026-02-26 14:18:21 UTC by Zverik ♦174 |
| 178982822 (Comments: 4) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 15) | I made the change I think is correct here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179086901 commented 2026-02-26 14:16:57 UTC by ion_chi ♦56 |
| 178137127 (Comments: 3) | AAFmapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok the Symphony of Lights will be discontinued soon so we can observe the situation and delete it. commented 2026-02-26 14:10:46 UTC by kingkingHK ♦105 |
| 179054946 (Comments: 3) | Rotilom (Discussed changesets: 13) | This should now be fixed! Thanks! commented 2026-02-26 14:06:16 UTC by Rotilom ♦15 |
| 177806278 (Comments: 1) | ForRussia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте! Если у вас возникают вопросы к источникам, не стоит бежать править карту, напишите вопрос к пакету правок. Источник был ... commented 2026-02-26 14:00:19 UTC by Константин Гам ♦759 |
| 179083970 (Comments: 1) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 111) | ruch stołeczny commented 2026-02-26 14:00:04 UTC by Yog Sot ♦428 |
| 178094253 (Comments: 11) | rfrojen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Info on that here: https://operations.osmfoundation.org/policies/tiles/ commented 2026-02-26 13:59:22 UTC by MassCartog ♦320 |
| 179085497 (Comments: 1) | fssoul (Discussed changesets: 1) | mikro-mapping yang bagus commented 2026-02-26 13:58:54 UTC by FajrAl ♦184 |
| 179081028 (Comments: 2) | SalvisJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, Yes, culvert was built last Summer. Road is unpaved to provide access to real estate. commented 2026-02-26 13:50:12 UTC by SalvisJ ♦1 |
| 179051706 (Comments: 1) | alexandov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Buenos dias. Una cosa son los edificios (building) y otra son los predios que contienen los edificios. Acabo de corregir la mezcla que hizo. En todo caso, es normal entre quienes comienzan. Saludos y gracias commented 2026-02-26 13:48:29 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 178938579 (Comments: 3) | wies1 (Discussed changesets: 154) | Im OSM-Forum war gestern die Rede von `addr:`-Tags. Da habe ich https://taginfo.openstreetmap.ch/keys/addr%3Apostcode#values für die Schweiz angeschaut, und die (in diesem Fall) fünfstellige PLZ ist mir aufgefallen. commented 2026-02-26 13:40:56 UTC by habi ♦2,038 |
| 176976799 (Comments: 5) | LucasFUB (Discussed changesets: 1) | merci beaucoup commented 2026-02-26 13:30:43 UTC by frosm ♦1,160 |
| 178542112 (Comments: 4) | mechka (Discussed changesets: 5) | Мерси, сега разбирам commented 2026-02-26 13:27:27 UTC by mechka ♦5 |
| 178127730 (Comments: 1) | Furkan Gokcel (Discussed changesets: 1) | REPORTED commented 2026-02-26 13:11:10 UTC by yitimox ♦15 |
| 179083910 (Comments: 1) | Mpasternaklaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 13:03:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178954060 (Comments: 2) | čaro (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nie, došlo k omylu na mojej strane, Čaro commented 2026-02-26 12:54:31 UTC by čaro ♦1 |
| 175524210 (Comments: 2) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 需再確認位置，跑到馬路上 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524210 commented 2026-02-26 12:50:57 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 175524215 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 需再確認位置，跑到大門口了 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524215 commented 2026-02-26 12:49:42 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 178047585 (Comments: 4) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ha - well, the current state can be seen at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/2954c6ef-1c9b-4322-97b0-9da37777c139~1.jpg . One of the 166 references has been stickered over, one hasn't (or perhaps the sticker fell off or was removed). commented 2026-02-26 12:49:13 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,685 |
| 175524218 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 需再確認位置，並非建築內 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524218 commented 2026-02-26 12:49:07 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 179083330 (Comments: 1) | textifypic007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 12:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179083242 (Comments: 1) | BoltMarketing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 12:45:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 175524223 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 位置需再確認，跑到農田裡 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524223 commented 2026-02-26 12:44:03 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 179030706 (Comments: 6) | Paul van der Heijden (Discussed changesets: 15) | Dit is wel een handig bestand om te raadplegen. Het verkeersbordenbestand van de overheid. https://wegkenmerken.ndw.nu/kaart/wegvakken/lijst?kaartlagen=BRT,SPEED_LIMIT,TRAFFIC_SIGN&zichtbaar-gebied=4.60577,51.66619,4.63494,51.67984&maxsne... commented 2026-02-26 12:43:45 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 175524225 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 位置需再確認，跑到校園外 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524225 commented 2026-02-26 12:43:30 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 175524230 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 位置需再確認，跑到廠區門口 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524230 commented 2026-02-26 12:42:42 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 175524236 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 位置需再確認，跑到校門口了 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524236 commented 2026-02-26 12:41:56 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 175524269 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 需再確認位置，不在校園內 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524269 commented 2026-02-26 12:39:46 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 141358777 (Comments: 2) | Coirib (Discussed changesets: 17) | Yea, looks good to me. Went ahead and removed the fixme from the Binbane - Tievebrack - Letterkenny 110kV line. The power poles used here look like the kind that carry 3 cables and two communication lines commented 2026-02-26 12:39:32 UTC by Coirib ♦16 |
| 177041773 (Comments: 1) | Man in Mayo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Addresses on this lane still show as "Humbert Mall". Where did you get "Humbert Lane" from? We can add both names if necessary. If there is a street sign, then that can be the main name. commented 2026-02-26 12:39:31 UTC by OscarBrownbread ♦6 |
| 174819615 (Comments: 2) | LySioS (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hello, Ça me parait bien, tu peux aussi rajouter la clé https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:small_electric_vehicle Suivant ce que dit l'arrêté, la clé `dismount` (cycliste autorisé mais pied... commented 2026-02-26 12:38:57 UTC by LySioS ♦139 |
| 175524270 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 需再確認位置，跑到農田裡 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524270 commented 2026-02-26 12:37:51 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 179044682 (Comments: 2) | NeisRevert (Discussed changesets: 4) | @MappingMore Thank you for your comment. In case you didn’t notice, the reverted changeset has already been referenced in the changeset tags here. Best regards, Pascal commented 2026-02-26 12:31:22 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179082777 (Comments: 1) | deivh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 12:30:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179078455 (Comments: 1) | lefrog06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179082328. You ignored that there is an existing lane mapping on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411141749 representing the turning lane (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:la... commented 2026-02-26 12:26:51 UTC by aixbrick ♦887 |
| 179062911 (Comments: 3) | JoniBarTeam (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ok, obrigado. commented 2026-02-26 12:15:01 UTC by luisforte ♦138 |
| 179081814 (Comments: 4) | Paul van der Heijden (Discussed changesets: 15) | Oke... Die naam heb ik laten staan. Het door elkaar renderen is opgelost. Ook het eilandje is nu te zien. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-02-26 12:13:14 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179081758 (Comments: 1) | hanimyon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 12:03:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 141720076 (Comments: 1) | FERINA365 (Discussed changesets: 72) | Het is lang geleden. Maar de muur (Way: 1030605185) om de storage tanks (Node: 11217401634, 11217401635, 11217401636) heeft in de note dat deze LN2 tanks beschermt. Echter de tanks hebben als content LNG, dat komt zo te zien niet overeen? commented 2026-02-26 11:57:34 UTC by Kees 59 ♦51 |
| 172161835 (Comments: 2) | TrondSBuskerudbyen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei. Ja, det er åpnet her. Bare jeg som har glemt å oppdatere alt sammen. Det ble mye endringer i Drammensområdet, men sykehus togspor og -stasjon på samme tid. Bare oppdatere hvis du vil. Så du åpnet GS-veien n&ae... commented 2026-02-26 11:55:57 UTC by FennecusZerda ♦18 |
| 179080785 (Comments: 1) | pelvis1665 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mistyped comment. Correction: Corrected, ways, nodes, buildings, added nodes, areas. commented 2026-02-26 11:37:43 UTC by pelvis1665 ♦1 |
| 179078875 (Comments: 1) | QuintenP (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-26 11:37:24 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 131854948 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 591) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3537112 commented 2026-02-26 11:36:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 179078964 (Comments: 1) | QuintenP (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Quinten, warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway \t1 Probleem opgelost. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-26 11:36:17 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179060379 (Comments: 2) | Edkowski (Discussed changesets: 5) | "Zgodnie z MPZP teren ten jest klasyfikowany jako działka orna (użytek rolny),a nie droga czy ciąg komunikacyjny" nie zmienia to faktu że podjazd tam istnieje więc może być zmapowany commented 2026-02-26 11:31:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 178589625 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 18) | re: Park Street Mini Park I walk past this park quite often when going to the shops and the bulk of the park is between Bedford and Coghlan, not Bedford and Olive. The website seems to reflect this: it indicates that a playground is at ... commented 2026-02-26 11:25:17 UTC by lamms ♦9 |
 | 177326178 (Comments: 1) | Pirogovsky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Паш, привет Проход я вернул на место -- хоть он и идет по территории частных участков, я по нему проходил два раза + он был корректно отмеч... commented 2026-02-26 11:23:31 UTC by ks1v ♦24 |
| 178821077 (Comments: 1) | JeremySoudan74 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, J'ai vu que vous aviez modifié les noms de certaines remontées à Chamonix en rajoutant leur préfixe juste avant. Le format correct dans "name=" est simplement le nom propre de l'insta... commented 2026-02-26 11:16:06 UTC by Anonix35 ♦67 |
| 179058419 (Comments: 1) | Edkowski (Discussed changesets: 5) | do tego czy coś moż być mapowanie nie ma to nawet najmniejszego znaczenia czy teren jest prywatny a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1186055482 jest zaznaczona jako access=private czyli z ograniczonym dostępem commented 2026-02-26 11:15:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 179059229 (Comments: 1) | ArjanO (Discussed changesets: 19) | De link in website werkt niet voor mij, timed out met de melding "Secure Connection Failed" Zoeken op internet vindt https://www.afiklmem.com/en/epcor/epcor-home. Op deze site kom ik echter het ingevoerde telefoonnummer na een... commented 2026-02-26 11:14:03 UTC by Kees 59 ♦51 |
| 175524283 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 需再確認位置，不在校園內 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524283 commented 2026-02-26 11:07:02 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 175524293 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 需再確定位置，不在校園內 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524293 commented 2026-02-26 11:06:07 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 179070315 (Comments: 1) | Camoscio Sibillini (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao Camoscio Sibillini, visto che la maggior parte delle applicazioni basate su OpenStreetMap non utilizzano i dati in tempo reale, l'indicazione è di mappare chiusure temporanee se il periodo previsto è di almeno 6/9 mesi (ved... commented 2026-02-26 11:03:31 UTC by totera ♦328 |
| 178894575 (Comments: 2) | LegrandJ (Discussed changesets: 44) | Certes mais ce sont des travaux de deux ans et la route entière est démolie pour être reconstruite avec terre plein central commented 2026-02-26 10:54:16 UTC by BarathéonR ♦3 |
| 178879873 (Comments: 2) | Ningen716 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Остановки физически уже присутствуют в лице установленных знаков "Остановка трамвая", ведется ли на них постоянная посадка и высад... commented 2026-02-26 10:49:19 UTC by Ningen716 ♦1 |
| 178935260 (Comments: 4) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 182) | Chyba można to zostawić jak teraz jest zmapowane. Rowerzysta może prowadzić rower chodnikiem i na przejściu włączyć się do ruchu pod prąd na ul. II Brygady. Jednocześnie żaden routing nie powinien zezwalać rowerzystom na wjazd w u... commented 2026-02-26 10:43:09 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,011 |
| 179031652 (Comments: 1) | Camping Confort (Discussed changesets: 1) | send private message https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch commented 2026-02-26 10:32:34 UTC by Jakka ♦1,845 |
| 179071785 (Comments: 2) | connectiondentalcare (Discussed changesets: 1) | The location appears to be incorrect. It should be listed here instead: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/39.037292/-77.029210 Could you please update your entry accordingly? Thank you. commented 2026-02-26 10:32:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178848599 (Comments: 2) | so-rose (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi ❤️🔥, sorry for the confusion. I didn't read the Vespucci manual well enough - still getting used to the workflows. Appreciate the heads-up. In this case I went for a guided hike on Pigeon island, and did a GPS track of one ... commented 2026-02-26 10:30:31 UTC by so-rose ♦1 |
| 178545112 (Comments: 2) | mаrаf24 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Poprawię note, teraz jest tam mała tabliczka o zakazie wejścia. commented 2026-02-26 10:28:03 UTC by mаrаf24 ♦12 |
| 150677707 (Comments: 2) | Shyshka (Discussed changesets: 54) | В документації також прописано, що highway=crossing має бути: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Tag:footway=crossing#%D0%AF%D0%BA_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8 commented 2026-02-26 10:27:57 UTC by Chieftl ♦62 |
| 179077695 (Comments: 1) | Wim Labie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 10:24:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179075256 (Comments: 1) | valentin_voev (Discussed changesets: 2) | Защо сте направил тази промяна? Точно за блокове в квартали е прието в българската OSM общност да има "бл." пред номерата. https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-02-26 10:24:28 UTC by Fraxi ♦274 |
| 166403904 (Comments: 3) | DiaouligRu (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ah, m..., je me suis fait avoir avec l'historique. Bon comme il ne contribue plus, ça ne sert pas à grand chose de le lui dire. Lui aussi ajoutait les noms en breton, avec un beau commentaire en plus : https://www.openstreetmap.... commented 2026-02-26 10:20:29 UTC by trial ♦1,097 |
| 179077385 (Comments: 1) | allprooverheaddoor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 10:15:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179066259 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 128) | If it's fine to be that close to the Developments surely it's not too tight to e.g. Hsin Kuang Centre. But I'll wait for more details on Discord first. commented 2026-02-26 10:05:27 UTC by kingkingHK ♦105 |
| 131205779 (Comments: 8) | taihoku (Discussed changesets: 21) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19842 commented 2026-02-26 10:03:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,552 |
| 177937352 (Comments: 7) | taihoku (Discussed changesets: 21) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19842 commented 2026-02-26 10:03:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,552 |
| 179041147 (Comments: 2) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Team, Apologies for the mistake. I have reverted the edit. Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will be more careful when editing the existing data in the future. Regards Arya PG commented 2026-02-26 10:02:02 UTC by apgosm ♦3 |
| 179039596 (Comments: 3) | JakobHtz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke :) commented 2026-02-26 09:58:35 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 70935431 (Comments: 1) | wellmer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Du hast hier ein paar Wege ohne Anbindung in die Landschaft gezaubert. Existieren die so einfach losgelöst? Gruß Protoxenus commented 2026-02-26 09:53:05 UTC by Protoxenus ♦331 |
| 178133653 (Comments: 5) | RichiWe (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und danke für deine Rückmeldung. Mit fehlt die Erfahrung wie solche Geologischen Dinge richtig getaggt werden. Daher kann ich nicht sagen, was hier richtig ist. Was deine Quellen angeht: wenn ich das richtig verstanden ... commented 2026-02-26 09:50:21 UTC by Markus366 ♦191 |
| 179075381 (Comments: 1) | MuseumVD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. Er was al een adresnode hier. Daar heb ik de info nu mee samengevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-26 09:45:00 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 134053967 (Comments: 1) | arturp (Discussed changesets: 34) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5181343 commented 2026-02-26 09:42:13 UTC by kubahahaha ♦432 |
| 179074512 (Comments: 1) | PeterPavol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Názov ulice sa do adresy dáva keď je tam naozaj ulica a orientačné číslo, garáže majú zvyčajne len súpisné číslo bez ulice a orientačného. commented 2026-02-26 09:34:07 UTC by Dodko ♦1,305 |
| 179048968 (Comments: 1) | AlestePruden (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179074735 commented 2026-02-26 09:29:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178978212 (Comments: 4) | stadt-duisburg_dui3 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bitte ignorieren Sie die vorherigen Nachrrichten. Leider kann ich diese nicht zurück rufen. Ich habe gesehen, das Sie die ref L237 angegeben haben. Ich habe noch einen Straßenschlüssel ergänzt, den es durchaus für diesen Abs... commented 2026-02-26 09:23:25 UTC by stadt-duisburg_dui3 ♦5 |
| 179051004 (Comments: 2) | Aurimas Fišeras (Discussed changesets: 39) | Tiesiog neatkreipiau dėmesio... Sutvarkiau. commented 2026-02-26 09:16:18 UTC by Aurimas Fišeras ♦50 |
| 179012348 (Comments: 1) | ChRogel (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi ChRogel, this changeset has damaged the forest relation 9983417: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-4.10144&lat=48.01385&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_wa... commented 2026-02-26 09:05:20 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| 178768185 (Comments: 1) | borishag (Discussed changesets: 45) | Shop will continue to operate for at least 6 more months https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179074446 commented 2026-02-26 09:03:47 UTC by borishag ♦160 |
| 179072452 (Comments: 1) | Andreea Abu-Daher (Discussed changesets: 3) | Buna, Este a nu stiu cata oara cand pui aberatii pe harta. Nu exista nicio strada Vintila Voda acolo. Este Bulevardul Mircea Voda. Te rog nu mai pune informatii incorecte pe harta! commented 2026-02-26 08:56:56 UTC by rarad74 ♦427 |
| 179073066 (Comments: 2) | AE35 (Discussed changesets: 59) | polygonen vil jeg sige er College for det hele commented 2026-02-26 08:54:40 UTC by AE35 ♦45 |
| 179073856 (Comments: 1) | micheleOSM3 (Discussed changesets: 24) | I forgot the comment in the changeset: Moved name=* to description=* see discussion on talk: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stage-and-name-in-long-distance-hiking-routes-and-superroutes/141480 commented 2026-02-26 08:50:25 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦149 |
| 179035568 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 62) | A split is needed at the intersection with Johnston Street based on street signs; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179073711 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-26 08:48:17 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦56 |
| 179072416 (Comments: 1) | gfic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tego typu opisy należy umieszczać w znaczniku description, znacznik name przeznaczony jest na nazwę własną obiektu. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw%C4%85 commented 2026-02-26 08:47:19 UTC by cheatach ♦36 |
| 179036704 (Comments: 1) | edaasd (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset id:179073780 commented 2026-02-26 08:46:56 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179073484 (Comments: 1) | The Cleaning Authority Vancouver Camas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 08:42:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178935954 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 71) | Hei, huomasimme että olet tässä ja useammassa muussakin muutoskokoelmassasi järjestelmällisen oloisesti lisännyt pihateille (highway=service) kulkurajoitteita access=private. Reittioppaan kannalta tämä on hiema... commented 2026-02-26 08:39:36 UTC by HSL_PALAUTE ♦24 |
| 179036462 (Comments: 1) | edaasd (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset id:179073438 commented 2026-02-26 08:38:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179032881 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 62) | A split is needed at the intersection with Camelia Road Northwest based on the position of the street sign, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179073103 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-26 08:31:57 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦56 |
| 179072989 (Comments: 1) | Olga Lomako (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fixed road geometry according to Esri World Imagery #mapbox_missing_roads commented 2026-02-26 08:28:06 UTC by Olga Lomako ♦3 |
| 179072800 (Comments: 1) | leolapuertamd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 08:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179033075 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 62) | Changed tag from maxunladenweight to hgv:destination based on street signs, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179072819 commented 2026-02-26 08:23:36 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦56 |
| 126942133 (Comments: 2) | fallonni (Discussed changesets: 2) | That is definitely a mistake - there is no general access through to the playing fields from this road. I assume I mistakenly included the full road when editing! Will fix now commented 2026-02-26 08:19:41 UTC by fallonni ♦1 |
| 179030777 (Comments: 3) | Alan Shek (Discussed changesets: 4) | However it's misleading, showing the `=marked` flaw. Those yellow stripes are not statutory, meaning they have no legal effects. They should not be confused with signalized, or white ones. commented 2026-02-26 08:18:09 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 179072503 (Comments: 1) | facenbodyca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 08:15:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179072428 (Comments: 1) | FMgraphiste (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 08:15:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179031205 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Okay, dann werde ich alle Wege mit dem Tag highway=service mit vehicle=private ergänzen. VG commented 2026-02-26 08:12:27 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦16 |
| 177575490 (Comments: 4) | forcella (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi forcella, this error still exits. Can you please fix this? Kind regards Guido commented 2026-02-26 08:05:45 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| 178959361 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hi Lisapple, your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.91237&lat=45.89721&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabr... commented 2026-02-26 08:03:46 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| 179051932 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hi Lisapple, your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.91237&lat=45.89721&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabr... commented 2026-02-26 08:03:11 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| 178850022 (Comments: 1) | Jaro8616 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Jaro8616, vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge! Zu den neuen "Wegen" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1481310861 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1481310862 habe ich allerdings eine Anmerkung: Das sind keine eigenständi... commented 2026-02-26 07:57:38 UTC by Romwriter ♦207 |
 | 179054318 (Comments: 1) | Bushala (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please don't place new highways on top of existing highways, as it disrupts routing. I've removed several duplicated highways in this region. Corrections should be made to any exsting features. Re... commented 2026-02-26 07:53:47 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,105 |
| 179057181 (Comments: 2) | True Soft (Discussed changesets: 1) | I already added a page, and also the company's permission to be used by OSM( https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-stops-and-routes-of-sibiu-romania-city-public-transport/141645 ). About the stop naming convention, they usually name the o... commented 2026-02-26 07:52:36 UTC by True Soft ♦1 |
| 179061413 (Comments: 1) | CAKA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, el tag high=556 m por ejemplo en https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13599643967/history según IGNráster (~990m) no es valor de elevación, qué significa? Saludos commented 2026-02-26 07:49:13 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 178949874 (Comments: 5) | seopinnacleagency (Discussed changesets: 13) | So it is ArtPro, will fix it. Sorry again! commented 2026-02-26 07:41:10 UTC by seopinnacleagency ♦2 |
| 178669858 (Comments: 6) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 298) | Začal som aj diskusiu https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/C98qOLirfnI a padli tam zaujímavé návrhy. commented 2026-02-26 07:36:20 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 177307611 (Comments: 5) | C_1965 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ich bin von Richtung NW nach SO durchs Wohngebiet gelaufen, unter Missachtung des Durchgangsverbots -:). An den Zugängen stehen tatsächlich die Verbotsschilder. Deswegen habe ich alle Wege auf access=private gesetzt. Auch die zwischen 2G... commented 2026-02-26 07:35:55 UTC by george1201 ♦282 |
 | 178942807 (Comments: 9) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 43) | Gud commented 2026-02-26 07:30:30 UTC by Laell ♦1 |
| 179045951 (Comments: 2) | fredlenoir (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bonjour, en effet ! c'est un oubli de ma part. belle journée, commented 2026-02-26 07:29:59 UTC by fredlenoir ♦19 |
| 179059058 (Comments: 1) | brendenb04 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in changeset id:179070932 commented 2026-02-26 07:29:48 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179049348 (Comments: 1) | TAWNYBITTERN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed the two duplicated highway sections. I've corrected the existing highway name. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-02-26 07:23:44 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,105 |
| 179069473 (Comments: 1) | czbo (Discussed changesets: 1) | press "q" while the building is selected to square the buildings so they don't end up an unusual shape. Thank you for contributing in the area! commented 2026-02-26 06:56:24 UTC by kylor ♦29 |
| 169367985 (Comments: 4) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 13) | In this case there is only one mapped way around the whole thing ... with all of the tags on that. No relation. If the individual segments require separation then add separate ways as building:part. Still no relation. commented 2026-02-26 06:55:41 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,748 |
| 179051683 (Comments: 1) | edaasd (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset id:179069829 commented 2026-02-26 06:54:07 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 171905685 (Comments: 1) | BMM994 (Discussed changesets: 126) | Hi, about block https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11835171512 - are you sure that it is a street and not on the side track road? commented 2026-02-26 06:52:55 UTC by Sanniu ♦626 |
| 178982455 (Comments: 1) | Wleka02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179069560 commented 2026-02-26 06:43:47 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179069174 (Comments: 1) | ZK Painting Ltd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 06:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178532050 (Comments: 5) | Alagris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Matthias, ich kann Deine Gedanken nachvollziehen, wenn man bei OSM nur an Karten denkt. OSM ist aber eine neutrale Geodatenbank - unabhängig vom Anwendungsfall. Davon gibt es sehr unterschiedliche. Karten sind nur ein Anwendungsbeispiel.... commented 2026-02-26 06:22:11 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦790 |
| 175135057 (Comments: 2) | jakecopp (Discussed changesets: 44) | No that is certainly an error. Thanks for catching that - will fix it later tonight. commented 2026-02-26 06:19:54 UTC by jakecopp ♦48 |
| 173528352 (Comments: 2) | kiwi75 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi, this is indeed the reason. It's a dangerous path that is not always open to traffic due to the river, and has no official markings or traffic signs. To me it makes sense that drivers are not routed through that road to go eg from Xiropigado ... commented 2026-02-26 06:06:10 UTC by kiwi75 ♦6 |
| 179018960 (Comments: 1) | beetle120 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the cycle path on the river and the path along South Wharf Drive don't exist due to current construction works. You can see this on the Esri World Imagery aerial view. I'll delete the paths added through the construction zone. commented 2026-02-26 05:58:43 UTC by RSota ♦8 |
 | 151465066 (Comments: 1) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 57) | Nice mapping! You may find it interesting to know that this weird feature is a type of air beacon called an VORTAC. Super neat thing. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427479737/history#map=19/-7.969863/-14.397361 https://maproulette.or... commented 2026-02-26 05:45:45 UTC by watmildon ♦291 |
| 178707476 (Comments: 2) | victor654 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178763072 commented 2026-02-26 05:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178698091 (Comments: 2) | saeed1362 (Discussed changesets: 4) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178753515 commented 2026-02-26 05:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178707874 (Comments: 2) | victor654 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178750018 commented 2026-02-26 05:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178690696 (Comments: 2) | saeed1362 (Discussed changesets: 4) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178753515 commented 2026-02-26 05:33:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178697151 (Comments: 2) | DrSawen (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178711725 commented 2026-02-26 05:33:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178707153 (Comments: 2) | Smart Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179067813 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-26 05:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178701745 (Comments: 2) | iMarketSEO (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179067811 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-26 05:33:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178700532 (Comments: 2) | FlockUz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178700914 commented 2026-02-26 05:33:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178696276 (Comments: 2) | Cormon (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179067809 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-26 05:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 179030064 (Comments: 1) | G_Meredith (Discussed changesets: 19) | There is already a railway=station tag, please don't duplicate. commented 2026-02-26 05:01:45 UTC by DaveF ♦1,610 |
| 179047102 (Comments: 1) | JWenWa (Discussed changesets: 3) | 1. highway=service shouldn't be removed. It's what tells data consumers that "this line represents a road." highway=service is used in conjunction with service=driveway for a driveway. I added highway=service back. 2. Is th... commented 2026-02-26 04:55:22 UTC by pwbriggs ♦170 |
| 179020496 (Comments: 1) | Cimera2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Cimera2, thank you for making these changes. I've noticed two issues: 1. On the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275008614. The value "indistinct" is not a valid value for the key "highway". It should remain as &q... commented 2026-02-26 04:40:58 UTC by sanddune ♦6 |
| 178780192 (Comments: 9) | swall83 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Servus swall83, ich habe mit dem changeset https://osm.org/changeset/179066306 dieses changeset zurückgesetzt. Ich habe bei der Überprüfung vor Ort keine Schilder für Texas- bzw. Pullacher-Kreisel gesehen. Die... commented 2026-02-26 04:33:18 UTC by thobrist ♦8 |
| 136643161 (Comments: 1) | AKLAB (Discussed changesets: 16) | I thought you may find it interseting that this feature is actually used for air navigation and is called a VORTAC beacon. Great mapping! Keep it up! https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/54174 commented 2026-02-26 03:46:45 UTC by watmildon ♦291 |
| 179065306 (Comments: 1) | KayleeDevlin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-26 03:27:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179064122 (Comments: 1) | B Sai Deepthi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Please do not attach serviceway nodes to the Suburban Rail Loop ways commented 2026-02-26 03:10:02 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦80 |
| 179064555 (Comments: 1) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 10) | no offence, but 安大略;安大略 seems to be too repetitive; feel free to revert this edit commented 2026-02-26 02:40:55 UTC by hahae ♦23 |
 | 178899649 (Comments: 2) | lalluby6782 (Discussed changesets: 9) | La calle que se llamaba 1477 ahora es Carre y la 1479 es Giacomelli. El segmento que aparecia etiqueado como 1477 está marcado como Pasaje Peatonal en el mapa, planos municipales y en la calle con carteles, pero parecen circular autos y tiene ... commented 2026-02-26 02:10:57 UTC by lalluby6782 ♦5 |
| 179063614 (Comments: 1) | ForestFurnace (Discussed changesets: 37) | Boalsburg, PA: Changing East Kay Street from access:private to access:permissive. It is a privately owned road but looks like a standard asphalt residential road connecting the Kaywood neighborhood and the neighborhood to the east. I didn't see ... commented 2026-02-26 01:39:41 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦52 |
| 179045488 (Comments: 1) | Tiff2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please leave a brief changeset comment, besides the hashag explaining what this edit does. for example Added building. also, you can square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- ... commented 2026-02-26 01:15:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 179057228 (Comments: 1) | Jack2028069 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Could I possibly ask that you make more descriptive changeset descriptions? It makes tracking changes and QA job easier when you do. I understand writing a report of your own changes may be much less fun then mapping itself but doing th... commented 2026-02-26 00:58:01 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦10 |
 | 178965700 (Comments: 1) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 57) | Reverted - this changeset incorrectly created three United Kingdom relations, one for each overseas territory. The Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands are already part of the British Overseas Territory relation, please don't make such sign... commented 2026-02-26 00:54:48 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦184 |
| 178683095 (Comments: 1) | freesey (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo freesey, beachte immer das Copyright! Hier hast du das Bild (Deep-Link) einfach von dieser Webseite ( https://www.hotelhorizont.de , erstes Hintergrundbild ganz oben) genommen. Zitat aus deren Impressum: "Alle ... commented 2026-02-26 00:30:52 UTC by Map-Peter ♦345 |
| 179054680 (Comments: 1) | TalalQ8 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Coastlines are broken after this change. Please, read natural=coastline for the correct mapping. commented 2026-02-26 00:23:49 UTC by vng_me ♦139 |
| 179035553 (Comments: 1) | Mehmet Bey (Discussed changesets: 11) | Merhaba "Mehmet Bey" (ya da eski kullanıcı adınızla "Sinem Yazgı") uid:22152243 . Problemli gördüğüm birçok değişikliğinize geçmişte birden çok yorum yazdım. Hiçbirine cevap ve... commented 2026-02-26 00:07:47 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦231 |
| 179061824 (Comments: 1) | Naseem Maternity Hospital (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-26 00:00:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179061720 (Comments: 1) | Naseem Maternity Hospital (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 23:51:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 162981658 (Comments: 3) | tjasz (Discussed changesets: 1) | cool, thanks for confirming! commented 2026-02-25 23:26:34 UTC by pwbriggs ♦170 |
| 179000349 (Comments: 3) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 76) | 100% agree. Just wanted to make sure there weren't data quality issues you were aware of. Happy mapping! commented 2026-02-25 23:25:52 UTC by pwbriggs ♦170 |
| 179010973 (Comments: 2) | stoosm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the tips! commented 2026-02-25 23:22:51 UTC by stoosm ♦1 |
 | 179043477 (Comments: 1) | 올리버 (Discussed changesets: 3) | There is no reason for deleting the name. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179061084 commented 2026-02-25 23:09:40 UTC by KennyDap ♦70 |
| 179060792 (Comments: 2) | UDK Azur (Discussed changesets: 1) | modification effectuée, j'ai changé la description commented 2026-02-25 23:03:23 UTC by UDK Azur ♦1 |
 | 179006757 (Comments: 1) | AlbertoAlvarez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2026-02-25 23:03:08 UTC by Comino ♦313 |
| 179060880 (Comments: 1) | 500384411 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 23:00:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178631102 (Comments: 1) | Mabema1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola Mabema 1, para conformar los horarios de apertura se utiliza un guión corto "-". Revisa tus ediciones. https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/es/map/#zoom=6&lat=39.55&lon=0.68&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=15/41.50522/-5.74683... commented 2026-02-25 22:51:23 UTC by MarinoBM ♦128 |
| 179057426 (Comments: 2) | Bienson (Discussed changesets: 32) | POI already exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2130669275/ commented 2026-02-25 22:50:46 UTC by Bienson ♦407 |
| 179060537 (Comments: 1) | 500384467 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 22:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178739239 (Comments: 3) | SimonPoole (Discussed changesets: 54) | Because the relevant tags were empty. commented 2026-02-25 22:26:23 UTC by SimonPoole ♦359 |
| 178813959 (Comments: 1) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 65) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-02-25 22:10:44 UTC by maro21 ♦823 |
| 178975010 (Comments: 3) | Metsavana (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, no worries. In general, it is best not to survey/tag things in winter that are impossible to determine. But if you are local and you know the surface, then that's fine. On aerial, these look like typical dirt informal paths. Ground is... commented 2026-02-25 22:06:31 UTC by HellMap ♦837 |
| 144915572 (Comments: 3) | Aonikenk (Discussed changesets: 2) | J'essaierai d'aller voir sur place prochainement. En attendant, j'ai supprimé le nom et l'immatriculation. commented 2026-02-25 22:00:32 UTC by jcr83 ♦227 |
| 179059053 (Comments: 1) | Eliana Marcela Galeano Bermudez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-25 21:45:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179052322 (Comments: 3) | Edkowski (Discussed changesets: 5) | Cześć, ty tej drogi nie oznaczyłeś, a ją usunąłeś. Takich metod nie stosujemy przy istniejących drogach. Drogę oczywiście przywróciłem. Pozdrawiam. commented 2026-02-25 21:42:36 UTC by stasiu512 ♦266 |
| 179058867 (Comments: 1) | dlegg73 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-09-17 commented 2026-02-25 21:37:29 UTC by dlegg73 ♦12 |
| 178957106 (Comments: 3) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 74) | Spannend. Hier hab ich mal gerade in die historie geguckt. Das outline hatte nie eine addresse seit Version 1. Waren die vielleicht hier auf nodes und ich habe den vergessen zu mergen oder so? Na egal - ich trage die mal nach. |
| 179058460 (Comments: 1) | Holtiscool (Discussed changesets: 1) | More Will Be Done Further Up Line Towards Minehead Tomorrow - 21:22 25/02/26 commented 2026-02-25 21:22:46 UTC by Holtiscool ♦1 |
| 178407134 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_br93 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You requested a review. Thank you for the map contributions :) You forgot to modify two of the segments: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157019190 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544119840 When a road has m... commented 2026-02-25 21:22:31 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦715 |
| 178498409 (Comments: 3) | mbyte (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi mbyte, in der angegebenen Dsikussion wurde das Thema diskutiert und die überwiegende Meinung war, im Falle von Weißglas oder white glass recycling:glass:color-clear zu verwenden. Die Diskussion wurde dort von mir am 12.10.2024 zu... commented 2026-02-25 21:20:53 UTC by lyctkel ♦358 |
| 179048698 (Comments: 1) | jlcc78 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Este cambio incumple las directrices de etiquetado españolas: osm.wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Comunidad_Valenciana Los topónimos en esta zona de España deben de escribirse en catalán y no en una for... commented 2026-02-25 21:20:37 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,751 |
| 179058320 (Comments: 1) | Two Rivers Boatworks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 21:18:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179056239 (Comments: 3) | Edkowski (Discussed changesets: 5) | Witaj, Rozumiem Twoją argumentację dotyczącą punktów odniesienia w terenie. Moim celem nie jest "wymazywanie " rzeczywistości, ale ochrona prywatności i bezpieczeństwa. Musiałem podjąć radykalne kroki,poniewa... commented 2026-02-25 21:16:37 UTC by Edkowski ♦2 |
| 178598905 (Comments: 1) | eretyhh (Discussed changesets: 15) | Харківська державна академія фізичної культури - це не Харківська державна академія культури, яка зазначена в документі з посилання. То... commented 2026-02-25 21:11:10 UTC by Toli99 ♦2 |
| 178976007 (Comments: 5) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 212) | Die kann man akzeptieren. commented 2026-02-25 21:05:30 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,193 |
| 179057311 (Comments: 2) | grey83 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Adresnode hersteld.. Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode. commented 2026-02-25 20:52:23 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179051791 (Comments: 1) | -_-* (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179057426 commented 2026-02-25 20:47:27 UTC by Bienson ♦407 |
| 179057242 (Comments: 1) | Em Smart Vending (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 20:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179034959 (Comments: 1) | Marwis00 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Polecam sprawdzać, czy JOSM nie skraca listy źródeł. Nie wszystko się zmieściło i zabrakło źródła nazwy. Przykładowo wg https://eon.pl/-/media/Przetargi/PZ-10956/RPZ-Kasprowicza-OSD-zakres-prac-stacja-i-linie.ashx ostatnie dwa... commented 2026-02-25 20:44:05 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦371 |
| 179019419 (Comments: 1) | Shagalovo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте, ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с классификацией дорог: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway Тег embankment=yes используется для обозначе... commented 2026-02-25 20:23:43 UTC by Grass-snake ♦266 |
| 102234879 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 298) | Jasne, aj nazov kniznice vidite na Ortofoto... https://halic.biblib.sk/ commented 2026-02-25 20:14:59 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,803 |
| 179055678 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Villa Trompenberg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De dubbele vermelding van het hotel heb ik verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-25 20:11:08 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178914929 (Comments: 2) | captain_slow (Discussed changesets: 51) | Oh, vielen Dank. Das ist mir irgendwie durch die Lappen gegangen :-) commented 2026-02-25 20:09:38 UTC by captain_slow ♦76 |
| 179049206 (Comments: 1) | Natalie458 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Natalie, welcome to osm! I saw some issues with your change and corrected them. A swimming pools isn't natural water, but leisure=swiming_pool. Square/rectangle building should have squared corners, pressing 'Q' key when they are... commented 2026-02-25 20:00:36 UTC by wireguy ♦557 |
| 178563766 (Comments: 2) | m_artzt (Discussed changesets: 2) | After looking at this again I agree. The slight right would be for the left-most lane as that HOV lane splits and a slight right at that point is where I-405n HOV continues, and left would be I-5 S HOV. I’m still new to the map editing so I... commented 2026-02-25 19:59:34 UTC by m_artzt ♦1 |
| 179050685 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 135) | Офф... такива са. Това е търговска площ на "Top house" според https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.637682783567&lng=23.321911093333&z=17.116605057249508&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&dateFrom=2... commented 2026-02-25 19:58:31 UTC by Fraxi ♦274 |
| 179055416 (Comments: 1) | dlegg73 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2026-02-07. commented 2026-02-25 19:54:39 UTC by dlegg73 ♦12 |
| 178974785 (Comments: 8) | Alexey_ND (Discussed changesets: 30) | In case of a small number of nodes on a straight section. When we download a small fragment of the map (for example for editing), information about many lines inside is not loaded because there are no nodes in this place. for HellMap What d... commented 2026-02-25 19:51:54 UTC by Alexey_ND ♦19 |
| 179038155 (Comments: 2) | FHS_maps (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I've reverted your edits because they appear to be low-quality, which seems to be a common pattern among a majority of your changesets. One example is that a wall adjacent to the Swansea City Bus Station was randomly connected to the left... commented 2026-02-25 19:48:56 UTC by Aethonatic ♦38 |
| 179008681 (Comments: 2) | MHD (Discussed changesets: 29) | Nein, nur doppelt die Adresse am Gebäude reicht. commented 2026-02-25 19:46:52 UTC by MHD ♦18 |
| 179054673 (Comments: 1) | ccl_on_osm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-25 19:41:55 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178925235 (Comments: 1) | Trod Skunk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. I left a message on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162981658 asking about those. commented 2026-02-25 19:39:45 UTC by pwbriggs ♦170 |
| 170981015 (Comments: 1) | ptravadactyl (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, wondering if you can take a look at a note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5181306 Since you added Tommy Roberts Memorial Stadium and Jerry Hood Field with this changeset. commented 2026-02-25 19:30:16 UTC by cuzi ♦149 |
| 179007367 (Comments: 2) | larsenvd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Due to a lack of response and the fact that ski lifts that clearly make no sense are shown here (as well as my research online), I am forced to assume this is all fictitious and will revert all associated changesets. larsenvd, if you provide some con... commented 2026-02-25 19:27:41 UTC by Omnific ♦225 |
| 179050674 (Comments: 1) | jlcc78 (Discussed changesets: 47) | En este changeset se ha eliminado un nodo con 15 años de historial y múltiples etiquetas que alguien añadió en su día. En el territorio valenciano hay más cuevas de est tipo registradas, por lo que se ha perd... commented 2026-02-25 19:22:38 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,751 |
| 178987779 (Comments: 3) | Lejun (Discussed changesets: 82) | I can follow this reasoning but still need to maintain that the comment you used is grossly misleading and also that simply deleting a tag on this scale should be discussed with the community first. cheers --- |
| 179052352 (Comments: 1) | ac6998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | *Was supposed to say east bound, just for the record commented 2026-02-25 19:18:18 UTC by ac6998 ♦1 |
| 179005923 (Comments: 1) | Chrissy81 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Gude :) im Sinne von keep the history wäre es besser den node nicht zu löschen sondern entweder ein lifecycle prefix zu setzen oder statt shop=bicycle einfach shop=vacant zu setzen. Die nicht mehr benötigten Eigenschaften wie &O... commented 2026-02-25 19:17:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 179014653 (Comments: 4) | Vinny's Workshop (Discussed changesets: 3) | > I don't exactly know what counts as a "motorway" in Poland then please, do not change roads to highway=motorway in Poland commented 2026-02-25 19:16:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 179051416 (Comments: 1) | AidanaM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I noticed that you changed name:ru=улица Кабанбая to name:kk=улица Кабанбая. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22750875 Since “улица” is Russian, I just wanted to ask whether you are sure... commented 2026-02-25 19:15:19 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179047763 (Comments: 1) | Monkeydonia Isfunny (Discussed changesets: 2) | Same again, please see my comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179047084#c1560664 commented 2026-02-25 19:10:11 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179047084 (Comments: 1) | Monkeydonia Isfunny (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I noticed that several barrier=toll_booth objects include the toll price in the name tag (e.g. “Μετωπικός Μέστης 2,75€”). Since prices can change a... commented 2026-02-25 19:09:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179002649 (Comments: 2) | TalalQ8 (Discussed changesets: 8) | would u please help to adjust this. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179002649 commented 2026-02-25 19:09:10 UTC by TalalQ8 ♦5 |
| 179046054 (Comments: 1) | Metsavana (Discussed changesets: 3) | This does not look like a handlebar holder type parking, this looks like typical frame-supporting stands. commented 2026-02-25 19:06:57 UTC by HellMap ♦837 |
| 179011674 (Comments: 3) | shelter_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke, ja, jetzt ist es wieder da commented 2026-02-25 18:55:08 UTC by Strubbl ♦573 |
| 179051055 (Comments: 1) | jlcc78 (Discussed changesets: 47) | No es cierto que la denominación del pico del Montgó (Cap Gros del Montgó) se denomine "Montgó", a secas, en castellano. "Montgó" es toda la montaña. Por favor, deja de inventarte denom... commented 2026-02-25 18:50:02 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,751 |
| 179050784 (Comments: 1) | jlcc78 (Discussed changesets: 47) | ¿Podrías aportar textos en castellano en los que sea habitual traducir la parte específica del topónimo "Barranc de la Cova Tallada" y que aparezca como "Barranco de la Cueva Tallada"? commented 2026-02-25 18:48:03 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,751 |
| 179049103 (Comments: 1) | jlcc78 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Este cambio incumple las directrices de etiquetado españolas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Comunidad_Valenciana Recuerdo que este usuario ya ha sido bloqueado en otras ocasiones por vandali... commented 2026-02-25 18:39:04 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,751 |
| 179010635 (Comments: 1) | Szymq4x (Discussed changesets: 1) | To że droga jest prywatna nie oznacza że ma jej nie być na mapie. Mapujemy rzeczywistość i jeśli coś istnieje w rzeczywistości, znajduje się również na mapie. Przywróciłem tą drogę, dodałem tag access=private (który... commented 2026-02-25 18:10:43 UTC by bartgron ♦541 |
| 179038628 (Comments: 3) | FHS_maps (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179050054 commented 2026-02-25 18:08:16 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 179049332 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 430) | Looks like a 6th partition is needed, Via Bugiardi a good candidate as a lead along which to split this wood with at least 100 more inner areas to map. commented 2026-02-25 18:02:45 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,471 |
| 176180375 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hallo Michael Spitzenberger, was ist denn die Quelle für den Namen Kirchtal für mehrere Straßen in diesem Änderungssatz? Ich wundere mich, weil diese Straßen keinen Namen haben. Viele Grüße, Rain... commented 2026-02-25 17:54:04 UTC by Rainero ♦609 |
| 179014992 (Comments: 4) | jaybomb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Additionally these outlines are close to but not quite square whereas most buildings in NZ have largely 90 degree corners. Please use the Square option (short cut S) in the ID editor --- Published using ... commented 2026-02-25 17:53:35 UTC by ralley ♦629 |
| 178976657 (Comments: 3) | Lukashot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Od mlynskiej to jest strefa zamieszkania a pozniej w prawo do 31a to prywatna. Chce zeby tedy nawigacje pokazywaly bo od nadrzecznej jest lipa commented 2026-02-25 17:49:23 UTC by Lukashot ♦2 |
| 179049032 (Comments: 1) | SD Mapman (Discussed changesets: 34) | Note when I say the routes weren't good I meant that the relations were poor quality, was not discussing the physical routes themselves commented 2026-02-25 17:48:47 UTC by SD Mapman ♦63 |
| 178983256 (Comments: 2) | Lukashot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Skopany po calosci? commented 2026-02-25 17:47:30 UTC by Lukashot ♦2 |
| 178688971 (Comments: 2) | saeed1362 (Discussed changesets: 4) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178753515 commented 2026-02-25 17:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178689262 (Comments: 2) | saeed1362 (Discussed changesets: 4) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178753515 commented 2026-02-25 17:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178666930 (Comments: 2) | Blessed Properties (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178669841 commented 2026-02-25 17:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
 | 178689297 (Comments: 2) | MaLaK Bn (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178708622 commented 2026-02-25 17:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178672961 (Comments: 2) | bamesabzco (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179048461 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-25 17:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178687039 (Comments: 2) | Pawlak Clinic - Europejskie Centrum Kliniczne (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178687822 commented 2026-02-25 17:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178675296 (Comments: 2) | painandsleepdoctor (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178689773 commented 2026-02-25 17:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178668457 (Comments: 2) | Jesper Songer (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178669254 commented 2026-02-25 17:33:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178667410 (Comments: 2) | marquisfinecabinetry (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179048459 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 17:33:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178665463 (Comments: 2) | Johna Petersen (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179048454 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 17:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178979938 (Comments: 1) | Palesa Candice (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for updating these. Should these two identical schools be merged into one object? From aerial imagery they appear to be separate, but perhaps your local knowledge can assist here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296800407 https... commented 2026-02-25 17:30:04 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦361 |
| 163100254 (Comments: 1) | Hugo7777 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dobrý deň, môžete uviesť zdroj názvu ulice "Koliba Gardens"? commented 2026-02-25 17:25:07 UTC by Illio ♦91 |
| 179004090 (Comments: 1) | Nilde75 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Buongiorno. Chiedo gentilmente il perchè sono state cambiate le classificazioni alle strade. Saluti commented 2026-02-25 17:15:46 UTC by gpstracks ♦100 |
| 179047559 (Comments: 1) | 500384615 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 17:15:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178981276 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 71) | Also why remove a 'fixme=resurvey', if you didn't actually change the path at all? The additions seem mostly fine, but small reverts might be useful to avoid losing data. Miksi poistit myös 'fixme=resurvey'-tagin,... commented 2026-02-25 17:01:17 UTC by カシオペア ♦5 |
| 176615511 (Comments: 5) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 103) | No surprise there :D But the project is significantly delayed. That's why I'm asking if the change is still valid. I don't live solely in the virtual world either. commented 2026-02-25 17:01:14 UTC by HaPe-CZ ♦105 |
| 178609337 (Comments: 3) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thanks! commented 2026-02-25 16:52:25 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179042695 (Comments: 1) | Erwin Stam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-25 16:48:14 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 167234349 (Comments: 2) | Filip009 (Discussed changesets: 68) | Zdravím, názov bol pridaný v tretej verzii danej cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301914539/history/3 commented 2026-02-25 16:46:29 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 179045575 (Comments: 1) | GiselleDeSousa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-25 16:46:20 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179045716 (Comments: 1) | GiselleDeSousa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag GiselleDeSousa, Speeltuintjes hebben in de regle geen straatnaam. MVG commented 2026-02-25 16:45:52 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179045814 (Comments: 1) | Advance tire shop LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 16:39:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 172200626 (Comments: 2) | saintam1 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello, it's just to indicate that the paths are suitable for cycling, and there are no signs forbidding it there commented 2026-02-25 16:39:15 UTC by saintam1 ♦163 |
| 179004415 (Comments: 1) | Nilde75 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ciao, le tue modifiche hanno rotto delle "relation", adesso le sto mettendo a posto. commented 2026-02-25 16:33:05 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦149 |
| 179045067 (Comments: 1) | Quantum Integral Healing Arts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 16:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179033570 (Comments: 1) | m_p_13 (Discussed changesets: 159) | – Budowę już zmapowałem kilka dni temu. – Proszę nie mapować na podstawie anonimowych uwag bez sprawdzenia w innym źródle. W tym przypadku https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4875448 należy sprawdzić na miejscu czy jest t... commented 2026-02-25 16:22:01 UTC by maro21 ♦823 |
| 178892780 (Comments: 2) | no matter what I put down as the display name it said it was already taken (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice. commented 2026-02-25 16:18:50 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 174247786 (Comments: 3) | Carto Diem (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai homogénéisé dans votre sens, considérant que vous connaissez mieux le coin que moi. commented 2026-02-25 16:16:28 UTC by Eric S ♦37 |
| 179041600 (Comments: 3) | sammisattic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-02-25 16:13:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179041718 (Comments: 3) | sammisattic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-02-25 16:12:48 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178941574 (Comments: 1) | bartunkova_lucka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 179044499 commented 2026-02-25 16:12:28 UTC by 007Transformer ♦24 |
| 178921623 (Comments: 1) | 和家 李 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179044343 commented 2026-02-25 16:07:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179044233 (Comments: 1) | Medina Health Care (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 16:06:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179037909 (Comments: 1) | diacriticalhit (Discussed changesets: 1) | need to revert this commented 2026-02-25 15:58:12 UTC by diacriticalhit ♦5 |
| 179029201 (Comments: 1) | Kinga | Edycje (Discussed changesets: 59) | A ta aktualizacja na jakiej podstawie? Jakie jest źródło adresu 37? Adres tutaj już jest 37-47: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200937990 W użytym przez ciebie podkładzie z adresami jest dokładnie tak jak było zmapowane. commented 2026-02-25 15:54:38 UTC by maro21 ♦823 |
| 179043514 (Comments: 1) | 500373333 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 15:51:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178908502 (Comments: 1) | Alt7706 (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2026-02-25 15:50:42 UTC by maro21 ♦823 |
| 179041548 (Comments: 1) | Rsjjesus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vandalism commented 2026-02-25 15:42:38 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,767 |
| 179007344 (Comments: 1) | NRV_Privacy_Advocate (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just to note, changesets spanning massive bounding boxes aggregating changes from multiple very geographically separate areas https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179007344 are strongly discouraged on OSM, as they make browsing and reviewing them... commented 2026-02-25 15:41:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦81 |
| 179002817 (Comments: 2) | NRV_Privacy_Advocate (Discussed changesets: 2) | In changeset #179040841 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179040841 for all ALPRs in the Blacksburg/Christiansburg area, I've corrected the `wikipedia` links added here to `manufacturer:wikipedia`, as well as fixed other instances of the ... commented 2026-02-25 15:40:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦81 |
| 160353637 (Comments: 1) | W-HEC (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, je ne connais pas les lieux mais j'ai un souci avec cette relation que tu es le dernier à avoir modifié : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15745990 Les attributs indiquent que c'est une zone sans mur s... commented 2026-02-25 15:33:24 UTC by Yunan973 ♦91 |
| 164827613 (Comments: 1) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hello, Why did you remove all english and greek names? commented 2026-02-25 15:31:15 UTC by George Karidis ♦8 |
| 165074265 (Comments: 1) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hello, Why did you remove all the english names? commented 2026-02-25 15:29:38 UTC by George Karidis ♦8 |
| 156790706 (Comments: 5) | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (Discussed changesets: 21) | Fix: Previously, wiki stated that oneway=yes should only be taken into account for vehicles, and that foot traffic should use foot:forward and foot:backward keys. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot:forward (oneway:foot is also mentio... commented 2026-02-25 15:29:22 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦499 |
| 109893348 (Comments: 2) | Fabe56 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Salut, désolé pour le délai. Je ne crois pas que les casier VintedGo existait il y a 4 ans. Dans mon souvenir c'était vraiment juste boite d'envoi, évident d'aller au comptoir. J'ai corrigé... commented 2026-02-25 15:22:00 UTC by Fabe56 ♦45 |
| 178989522 (Comments: 2) | scarapella (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thank you very much for pointing that out. I know the pattern well, but it doesn't stop me from making mistakes. So I appreciate the assistance. I found and cleaned up a few other of the same mistakes as well https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-02-25 15:20:21 UTC by scarapella ♦47 |
| 179040201 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 182) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179041734 commented 2026-02-25 15:16:30 UTC by TinPetreković ♦268 |
| 179041858 (Comments: 1) | 500378922 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 15:15:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179041606 (Comments: 1) | chanti_zen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sources: street view, aerial view, local knowledge commented 2026-02-25 15:13:19 UTC by chanti_zen ♦1 |
| 179040841 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach (Discussed changesets: 9) | In part, a followup to changeset #179002817 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179002817 to correct the `wikipedia` links added therein to `manufacturer:wikipedia` (assuming we want to leave them at all and not just rely on the preferred `manufa... commented 2026-02-25 15:01:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦81 |
| 179041009 (Comments: 1) | 500384467 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 14:57:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179040875 (Comments: 1) | Nic’s Naks and Games (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 14:57:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178962343 (Comments: 2) | Naana44ghazisari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179040604 commented 2026-02-25 14:48:25 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179034910 (Comments: 1) | Tris_1220 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, ich habe old_name=Schönbrunner Schlossstraße auf alt_name geändert old_name wäre für einen ehem. historischen Namen, aber die Straße hat nie so geheißen alt_name ist für alternati... commented 2026-02-25 14:38:20 UTC by Luzandro ♦984 |
| X | 178947319 (Comments: 5) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 43) | Two new topics in the wiki discussion: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Automated_edits_to_remove_leisure=pitch_+_sport=golf commented 2026-02-25 14:30:08 UTC by Hypsometric ♦56 |
| 177567806 (Comments: 2) | MOB_XL (Discussed changesets: 4) | En fait elle est defacto oneway pour la partie entre le 2 et 34 mais aucun panneau ! j'ai corrigé avec oneway:bicycle=no Par contre cette partie : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238600634#map=19/50.834613/4.367249&layers=N ... commented 2026-02-25 14:01:10 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦126 |
| 178914330 (Comments: 1) | ordinatous (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, piste:grooming \tclassic+skating le caractère de séparation de valeur multiple est ";" et non "+" Cordialement, Marc commented 2026-02-25 13:56:42 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,483 |
| X | 178962374 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3862) | I foremost agreed with the reversion of all imported landuse data made under my account's name. However the reversion also affected several non imported changeset made with the browser built in editor in which has no relation with the gre... commented 2026-02-25 13:50:45 UTC by Aroru ♦4 |
| 177568696 (Comments: 2) | MOB_XL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Est-ce que les changements sont réellements effectif ou il s'agit d'une projection ? (on map la réalité sur OSM, on peut éventuellement ajouter proposed) mais j'ai de sérieux doute su... commented 2026-02-25 13:49:48 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦126 |
| 179028941 (Comments: 2) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 157) | Hi, I just improved the geometry of roads from current Bing Aerial Imagery (I can see I didn't put Bing to sources of this changeset, sry). I fixed a lot of ways by redrawing it (delete all nodes of the way except first 2, then draw the rest ... commented 2026-02-25 13:44:22 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦235 |
| 171771506 (Comments: 1) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 111) | "dojazd do posesji będzie możliwy" - czyli powinno być construction=minor. commented 2026-02-25 13:43:49 UTC by YomanNH ♦474 |
| 168241812 (Comments: 1) | Eric-Chambly (Discussed changesets: 23) | Bonjour, je viens de remarquer un nombre incalculables d'erreurs sur Hayange suite à ce groupe de modifs. C'est un peu embêtant de devoir repasser derrière à chaque fois. commented 2026-02-25 13:41:23 UTC by Théodu57 ♦2 |
| 178157517 (Comments: 2) | OKTMighty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Were you able to figure anything out? commented 2026-02-25 13:38:38 UTC by Xvtn ♦487 |
| 174067809 (Comments: 2) | Halfdeaf007 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Were you able to figure anything out? commented 2026-02-25 13:38:27 UTC by Xvtn ♦487 |
| 179037575 (Comments: 1) | unenTT (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178372730 commented 2026-02-25 13:35:54 UTC by unenTT ♦4 |
| 178372730 (Comments: 1) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset is reverted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179037575 commented 2026-02-25 13:35:18 UTC by unenTT ♦4 |
| 178809554 (Comments: 2) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi trial! Thank you for your participation. I’m grateful for that! Best regards, Maksim! commented 2026-02-25 13:30:11 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦27 |
| 178762763 (Comments: 2) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi notmyproblem1! Thank you for your feedback. I made a minor change on the roundabout, I divided two entrances into roundabout traffic since they had a common entry point. Best regards, Maksim! commented 2026-02-25 13:29:39 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦27 |
| 163956165 (Comments: 1) | brianh (Discussed changesets: 116) | Hi, Could you check the non-standard colour here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12691337121/ :) commented 2026-02-25 13:28:07 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,028 |
| 179037079 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 62) | Deleted accidentaly created node, fixed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179037180 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-25 13:28:01 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦56 |
| 179034592 (Comments: 2) | Dayan Mayor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Should be fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179035657 commented 2026-02-25 13:17:25 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179008095 (Comments: 1) | Katherine Vaughn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179036665 commented 2026-02-25 13:12:43 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 166381123 (Comments: 3) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 122) | those ways are unfinished mapping of landuse and can be later used to finish it. commented 2026-02-25 13:03:39 UTC by *Martin* ♦657 |
| 179014927 (Comments: 2) | lambalicious (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hay que tener ojo con las partes en que las ciclovías son solo para bicicletas y cuando admiten peatones. Usted conoce mejor el sector que yo, pero a simple vista se notan partes en que las vías peatonales quedan cortadas por ciclov&iac... commented 2026-02-25 12:40:25 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
 | 179034992 (Comments: 1) | evgenykatyshev (Discussed changesets: 72) | On the ground, three buildings have official plates with the same number 79. But there is a shop with a plate with the number 79a in one of them. Another building has a sticker with ბ letter over its official plate. So I decided to use these contro... commented 2026-02-25 12:34:06 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦231 |
| 179027485 (Comments: 1) | CoffeecatDE (Discussed changesets: 7) | Steht er nicht mehr da? Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass der Tisch nur im Sommer da steht. Oder halt immer mal wo anders. commented 2026-02-25 12:32:28 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦29 |
| 57298258 (Comments: 1) | Viliam Šebora (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ahoj, chodniky, ktore nevedu popri ceste nemozu mat footway=sidewalk. Opravil som napr. tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570747233 a inde. commented 2026-02-25 12:29:23 UTC by Tomas_J ♦333 |
| 178302222 (Comments: 5) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Sammyhawkrad, My intention was not to remove useful data, but to prevent incorrect tagging from remaining in the database, and I completely understand your point. We are also having ongoing internal discussions on where a revert is preferab... commented 2026-02-25 12:21:39 UTC by World_Winner ♦17 |
| 167864487 (Comments: 2) | Langenselbolder (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! Sollte der Tag gelöscht worden sein, dann war das ein versehen. Als ich das geändert habe war das keine Straße, sondern ein Feldweg. JETZT ist alles anders und die aktuelle Beschreibung paßt. LG! commented 2026-02-25 12:18:53 UTC by Langenselbolder ♦2 |
| 179015477 (Comments: 2) | lambalicious (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ahí pillé una foto en internet y lo arreglé. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179015477 commented 2026-02-25 12:15:50 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 159464261 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 288) | Cześć, czy ten plac budowy wciąż istnieje: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033229366 commented 2026-02-25 12:14:41 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦854 |
| 179033858 (Comments: 1) | Akumulatory Specpart PSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 12:12:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178990804 (Comments: 1) | Fandy_1998 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Korrektur: Zugang nur für Besucher / Kunden des Freibades und Restaurants. commented 2026-02-25 12:08:52 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,028 |
| 178956607 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 591) | oj, coś mi się pomerdało poprawiłem, dzięki za zauważenie commented 2026-02-25 12:08:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 178992179 (Comments: 1) | Fandy_1998 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, das kann hier nicht sein. Der Fahrradständer ist hier konkret für die Feuerwehr. Wie man vor Ort (aber auch in Mapillary) gut sehen kann, ist noch nicht mal die Zufahrt zum Radständer legal, da wir hier ein VZ 250+1026-33 haben.... commented 2026-02-25 12:06:53 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,028 |
| 178750176 (Comments: 1) | Vinny's Workshop (Discussed changesets: 3) | incorrect change, it's not a highway commented 2026-02-25 12:06:08 UTC by zuicz ♦299 |
| 179028257 (Comments: 1) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 72) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429965902/history do grade3? commented 2026-02-25 12:04:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 179027449 (Comments: 1) | physi (Discussed changesets: 53) | Du hast keine Quelle angegeben .. aber ich vermute dir ist nicht bekannt, das hier zur Zeit 2 Schulen am Standort sind? Die GHS Kirschhecke schließt 2027, das Berufskolleg Rheydt-Mülfort für Wirtschaft und Verwaltung ist schon grö... commented 2026-02-25 12:03:42 UTC by tux67 ♦2,019 |
| 179033531 (Comments: 1) | deivh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-25 12:03:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178842346 (Comments: 1) | kiradessous (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, kiradessous! What evidence can you provide about the renaming of a residential building? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178842346 commented 2026-02-25 11:58:38 UTC by mikita_paloika ♦1 |
| 153758405 (Comments: 1) | Leoss (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, mal abgesehen davon, dass die Läden immer noch existieren, auch wenn sie anders genutzt werden oder leer stehen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik Gruß Protoxenus commented 2026-02-25 11:51:04 UTC by Protoxenus ♦331 |
| 179002067 (Comments: 2) | Yunus onal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:179032957 commented 2026-02-25 11:47:50 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 176902722 (Comments: 10) | Fijord (Discussed changesets: 51) | > Bezüglich Hairstylist Pierre habe ich keine Änderungen vorgenommen [...] Doch, hast du: Klicke bei https://overpass-api.de/achavi/? changeset=176902722 auf den blauen Punkt, da siehst du dass du `shop=hairdresser` hinzugefü... commented 2026-02-25 11:44:55 UTC by habi ♦2,038 |
| 179022032 (Comments: 3) | klgtrading (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-02-25 11:35:48 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179021967 (Comments: 3) | klgtrading (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-02-25 11:35:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178870069 (Comments: 4) | Koreller (Discussed changesets: 21) | Moi aussi j'aime beaucoup la version 'fermée' à défaut de trouver une parade genre 'barrier=wall' pour le coté fermé. Il y a quelques semaines, j'ai eu la chance d'avoir une... commented 2026-02-25 11:33:13 UTC by divaddivag ♦138 |
| 179027358 (Comments: 2) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 182) | Dane drogowe na liniach `highway` tutaj wystarczają do wymuszenia odpowiednich kierunków jazdy bez dodatkowych relacji. Jeżeli chcesz mapować znaki, to można dodać w miejscu ich posadowienia dodać dodatkowy punkt z tagowaniem `traffic_si... commented 2026-02-25 11:26:54 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,011 |
 | 178971645 (Comments: 1) | Verra Banza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 179031717 commented 2026-02-25 11:22:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 175656979 (Comments: 2) | vrg (Discussed changesets: 24) | Osiedle było budowane i oddawane do użytku etapami, stąd było podzielone na dwa obszary, żeby jedno można było zmienić na residential już wcześniej. Teraz można połączyć i opis o etapach usunąć. commented 2026-02-25 11:12:43 UTC by vrg ♦13 |
| 179021729 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 80) | Revert of 178984113 commented 2026-02-25 10:46:45 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178968355 (Comments: 1) | Fd206 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179029425 commented 2026-02-25 10:33:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178875717 (Comments: 1) | offirla (Discussed changesets: 3) | שלום אופיר ותודה על כל התיקונים במפה. בבקשה לתת תיאור נכון לעריכה ולא לקרוא לכולן „שינויים שביצעתי”. במקרה הזה למשל אפשר לכתוב הי... commented 2026-02-25 10:32:47 UTC by hatul ♦439 |
| 179027625 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 40) | You must learn to use ID. ID is ten time easyer to use and was made by dedicated openstreetmap programmers. We dont have time to check what you do on the map. Then if you stiil want to use Go Map, please dont edit anymnore here. Thanks. commented 2026-02-25 10:22:06 UTC by rarad74 ♦427 |
| 179028702 (Comments: 1) | containerandpackaging (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 10:18:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179028630 (Comments: 1) | Antomaga (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-25 10:15:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178993695 (Comments: 2) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 58) | Nur die Änderungen der bus_stop nodes wieder auf den Stand vorher neben der Fahrbahn wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179026910 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179028371, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-02-25 10:12:50 UTC by cowboyxup ♦32 |
| 178971585 (Comments: 7) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 58) | Nur die Änderungen der bus_stop nodes wieder auf den Stand vorher neben der Fahrbahn wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179026910 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179028371, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-02-25 10:11:49 UTC by cowboyxup ♦32 |
| 179028254 (Comments: 1) | stefan_anec (Discussed changesets: 2) | Beste, Zaken die niet kloppen en dus niet correct zijn niet toevoegen aan OSM. Ook niet als je dat later wil reverten. De editor van osm is niet geschikt om zaken uit te testen. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-02-25 10:07:33 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178979221 (Comments: 1) | umattngheup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179028260 commented 2026-02-25 10:05:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178975194 (Comments: 1) | JanCierny (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, spravili prístavbu a spojili dve budovy školy do jednej? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482447623 commented 2026-02-25 09:55:24 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 178957248 (Comments: 1) | čaro (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zdravím, neviem, či je to najšťastnejšie tagovanie pre barrier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier A zároveň, či je daná jaskyňa aj kanálovým poklopom https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2026-02-25 09:50:07 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 179027583 (Comments: 1) | Saguaro Asphalt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 09:48:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177653251 (Comments: 1) | Rainbowfly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, est-ce que cette route est ré-ouverte ? commented 2026-02-25 09:44:34 UTC by mat ♦60 |
| 179011543 (Comments: 1) | mrkusypl (Discussed changesets: 4) | Cześć, te nakazy skrętu w osm są niepotrzebne. Nakaz skrętu jest tutaj wymuszany jezdniami jednokierunkowymi. Wycofuję zbędne dane. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179027358 commented 2026-02-25 09:42:50 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,011 |
| 177761093 (Comments: 1) | Libor Fiala FM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravím, svätý obrázok je https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=tree%20shrine commented 2026-02-25 09:41:03 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 179026367 (Comments: 2) | stefan_anec (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #179027204 commented 2026-02-25 09:39:40 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179024202 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | This building has been redrawn incorrectly. You can review OSM guidelines for creating adjacent buildings with a proper structure. Repeating this incorrect structure creates inconsistent data. commented 2026-02-25 09:39:33 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 175937000 (Comments: 2) | Ale_Zena_IT (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hello, thank you for the notification. I checked again 100 bus_stop around the changeset and I can't see any relevant error. there are some official abbreviations that could lead to a not local thinking to an error, like Loc. (abbreviatio... commented 2026-02-25 09:39:15 UTC by Ale_Zena_IT ♦178 |
| 178490357 (Comments: 1) | Heo Tham An (Discussed changesets: 4) | Trên thực tế nút giao không ký tự bằng số, vui lòng đặt tên theo thực tế commented 2026-02-25 09:38:55 UTC by ZioDragon ♦23 |
| 179026761 (Comments: 1) | Mcguiresoutdoors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 09:33:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178984355 (Comments: 1) | Libor Fiala FM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravím, nemapujeme pre renderer, takže keď to chcete ako atrakciu, nahláste to priamo na mapy.com. commented 2026-02-25 09:30:28 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 178995832 (Comments: 3) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 12) | Tábla alapján még a fő úton is sok helyen utca van kiírva. NTA alapján írtam be, de ez a tábla is utcát említ: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1075866437374798 commented 2026-02-25 09:29:34 UTC by qstep ♦45 |
| 179025129 (Comments: 2) | Speed Seed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Faktycznie, już poprawione commented 2026-02-25 09:21:03 UTC by Speed Seed ♦1 |
| 179026133 (Comments: 1) | Mey-Mey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 09:18:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178987743 (Comments: 1) | Matúš Jančík (Discussed changesets: 9) | Vďaka za doplnenie, nevedel som odhadnúť kadiaľ trasa vedie :) commented 2026-02-25 09:18:44 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 178996936 (Comments: 1) | Николай Кейдо (Discussed changesets: 13) | Nie usuwamy dodanych już drzew, żeby zamienić je na obszar. Wycofane commented 2026-02-25 08:59:51 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦35 |
| 178989782 (Comments: 4) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi. Are you familiar with this command? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter This should undo all mappings uploaded in that changeset If this don’t work well, you can give a search command for this cha... commented 2026-02-25 08:57:36 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 175898285 (Comments: 1) | jcr83 (Discussed changesets: 20) | concernant l'épave d'avion je ne pense pas qu'il s'agisse du Rockwell Commander 114 qui correspond plutôt à https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7900664387 commented 2026-02-25 08:57:01 UTC by Aonikenk ♦3 |
| 178924737 (Comments: 1) | blandchipsss (Discussed changesets: 4) | another tip: after drawing an area, you can press Q on your keyboard to 'square' the building, so that it's a proper rectangle shape commented 2026-02-25 08:52:44 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦449 |
| 178367246 (Comments: 8) | Александр Синявский (Discussed changesets: 19) | Есть нюанс. :) Газон и/или тротуар на частной земле станет парковкой только в том случае, если собственники земли проголосуют об этом на о... commented 2026-02-25 08:50:27 UTC by Александр Синявский ♦14 |
| 178980236 (Comments: 1) | sekai128 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, Ik kwam op deze POI door een telefoonnummer syntax checker (aangepast). Maar het viel mij op dat de website doorlinkt naar https://www.di-mina.nl/. Samen met dit artikel https://indebuurt.nl/doetinchem/bedrijvigheid/ondernemer-uitgelicht/v... commented 2026-02-25 08:50:22 UTC by Kees 59 ♦51 |
| 178932236 (Comments: 2) | blandchipsss (Discussed changesets: 4) | please use changeset comments to describe your edits. It looks like you deleted a number of important tags and changed the university to a high school. Without no changeset comment or explanation, it is likely that someone will just revert st... commented 2026-02-25 08:49:53 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦449 |
| 179009378 (Comments: 8) | marhof81 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je krijgt altijd antwoord van het Kadaster en/of de Gemeente. Vandaar dat je het beter zelf kunt doen. Het zou zelfs kunnen dat hier een verkeerd straatnaambord is opgehangen. Succes, eggie commented 2026-02-25 08:39:40 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179016322 (Comments: 3) | arthuranderson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi eerib, thanks for your clean up w/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179023605 Best regards, Pascal commented 2026-02-25 08:34:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
 | 179012675 (Comments: 1) | rip_notkods123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear rip_notkods123, please provide better changeset comments than just "."! Also, consider using the "q" key in your map editor to help you make your buildings square if they are square in reality. You may also want to ma... commented 2026-02-25 08:27:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,552 |
| 178660413 (Comments: 4) | RISE Physical Therapy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for your reply. The mentioned description has already been updated or removed. commented 2026-02-25 08:25:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 179023833 (Comments: 1) | Wanderfalter (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Wanderfalter, danke für Deinen Beitrag, aber es fehlt: healthcare=podiatrist. Mit diesem Schlüssel werden Einrichtungen gekennzeichnet, die Teil des Gesundheitswesens sind. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:hea... commented 2026-02-25 08:23:29 UTC by pitfire ♦721 |
| 165836769 (Comments: 3) | idith (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks a lot! commented 2026-02-25 08:17:49 UTC by Sanniu ♦626 |
| 178557340 (Comments: 1) | offirla (Discussed changesets: 3) | שלום! אחת ההנחיות ב-OSM היא שהשם צריך להיות השם האמיתי ולא שם תיאורי. דוגמה לשם תקין: חיפה, בית אורן, המשביר לצרכן דוגמה לשם לא תקין: ב... commented 2026-02-25 08:13:34 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦715 |
| 178966868 (Comments: 1) | henryj150 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in changeset id:179023416 commented 2026-02-25 08:04:45 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179009128 (Comments: 1) | Jimster86 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola bienvenido a osm, no entiendo muy bien lo que has querido hacer pero parece una prueba quizás. En cuanquier caso no tiene sentido y lo voy a revertir. Te aconsejo que te inicies por cosas sencillas como añadir POI's y con algu... commented 2026-02-25 08:04:34 UTC by lololailo ♦72 |
| 178966882 (Comments: 1) | henryj150 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in changeset id:179023172 commented 2026-02-25 07:56:40 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178661857 (Comments: 3) | espressocapital1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-02-25 07:54:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178661789 (Comments: 3) | espressocapital1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Spam commented 2026-02-25 07:54:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178967410 (Comments: 1) | henryj150 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in changeset id:179023047 commented 2026-02-25 07:53:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178872544 (Comments: 1) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 206) | hej to jakie w takim razie jest polaczenie z drugą jezdnią w tym miejscu? commented 2026-02-25 07:49:31 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦92 |
 | 178887022 (Comments: 1) | AlhassaneDiallo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi AlhassaneDiallo, your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-8.73665&lat=11.44331&zoom=11&baselayer=... commented 2026-02-25 07:49:25 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| 178909061 (Comments: 1) | AlhassaneDiallo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi AlhassaneDiallo, your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-8.73665&lat=11.44331&zoom=11&baselayer=... commented 2026-02-25 07:49:20 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| X | 178946423 (Comments: 3) | vogelfreier (Discussed changesets: 101) | I thought the same thing. Take a look at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2026-02-25 07:48:20 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦790 |
| 178659882 (Comments: 2) | Maryam Rasheed (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178752844 commented 2026-02-25 07:40:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178661013 (Comments: 2) | saherrrr (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178708246 commented 2026-02-25 07:40:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178663282 (Comments: 2) | brotherstailors (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179022651 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 07:40:39 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178662648 (Comments: 2) | Ari Wiradana (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178662995 commented 2026-02-25 07:40:37 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178662156 (Comments: 2) | myocpodiatrist (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179022649 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-25 07:40:37 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178661656 (Comments: 2) | Robert Hawthorne (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179022644 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 07:40:35 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 164443644 (Comments: 1) | Ori Levenglick (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I can't find the היצירה street there, can you mark it as you familiar with the place? commented 2026-02-25 07:38:44 UTC by Sanniu ♦626 |
| 178677625 (Comments: 5) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 22) | It has meanwhile been fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20251115/history#map=18/44.484298/12.074667 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178946395#map=18/44.484264/12.074702 Guido commented 2026-02-25 07:34:45 UTC by gscholz ♦2,884 |
| 178659803 (Comments: 2) | Amaima_86 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178752844 commented 2026-02-25 07:34:43 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 163665005 (Comments: 5) | Peter Matejovsky (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ďakujem! Áno presne niečo také som myslel, skúsim to takto urobiť. Vďaka aj za ukážku, veľmi to pomohlo to vidieť názorne v praxi commented 2026-02-25 07:34:33 UTC by EfreetSK ♦17 |
| 178972022 (Comments: 2) | moshikosh (Discussed changesets: 8) | hi i do not know about the actual changes. i only know that the bridge is active and buses are driving there. i do not know what happend with the old road, so i cant remove it. thanks commented 2026-02-25 07:31:26 UTC by moshikosh ♦7 |
| 172254465 (Comments: 1) | rza31 (Discussed changesets: 40) | 感谢您补充嘉善建筑。但是您使用的卫星图有点老了，木业大道（木雕城往北建设区域）那段工厂的话建筑已经是住宅区了。 commented 2026-02-25 07:28:04 UTC by フーヴァー リー ♦18 |
| 126148296 (Comments: 2) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 130) | Das habe ich vor 3 jahren gemacht, was soll ich da heute noch dazu sagen? Einfach ndern, wenn was falsch ist. commented 2026-02-25 07:24:14 UTC by wegavision ♦70 |
| 178930934 (Comments: 4) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Аз лично се съмнявам, че името е "Баничарница", дори и да има табела. По-скоро вероятно става дума за нарицателно име. Вижте за справк... commented 2026-02-25 07:22:40 UTC by Fraxi ♦274 |
| 178967803 (Comments: 3) | Flora Holderbaum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @MappingMore commented 2026-02-25 07:19:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178984321 (Comments: 1) | nickpetrou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, OpenStreetMap is a live map with real map data, and not a place for testing with fictional data. commented 2026-02-25 07:10:43 UTC by ika-chan! ♦334 |
| 177717102 (Comments: 2) | Fijord (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hallo Habi, vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis und die Links. Ich schätze deine Hintergrundinformationen, insbesondere da du als Strahlenschutverantwortlicher tätig bist – deshalb ist mir dein Feedback wichtig 😊 Aktuell ist... commented 2026-02-25 07:07:37 UTC by Fijord ♦60 |
| 179010436 (Comments: 1) | C-Team605 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hvorfor nedklassificerer du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358622554 Ifølge wiki'en, så er highway=unclassfied ikke en del af bybilledet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Tag:highway=unclassified?uselang=da commented 2026-02-25 07:06:57 UTC by b-holdet ♦346 |
| 178568485 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hey, congrats on your changeset #10,000! 🥳 commented 2026-02-25 07:06:13 UTC by pwbriggs ♦170 |
| 179021474 (Comments: 1) | RobotFK (Discussed changesets: 23) | Source, Lokales wissen und Website commented 2026-02-25 07:04:03 UTC by RobotFK ♦26 |
| 178024869 (Comments: 1) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 19) | Oh, okay then. (The "splitting" of CA 56 confused me; this seemed to clear things up for me.) I went ahead and added Ted Williams Fwy back to the CA 56 relations and removed Carmel Valley Rd from them. commented 2026-02-25 06:57:48 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦188 |
| 171848681 (Comments: 4) | DaveTO (Discussed changesets: 4) | And it is also tagged as an informal diet footway. If you have suggestions for how to tag it more clearly, please go ahead and make the changes. I don't see how it could be made any more specific. commented 2026-02-25 06:55:23 UTC by DaveTO ♦15 |
| 178244425 (Comments: 5) | NxPFoto (Discussed changesets: 13) | Kein Ding. Bis zum nächsten Mal ;) commented 2026-02-25 06:53:37 UTC by NxPFoto ♦11 |
| 178927025 (Comments: 2) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi sanchi, Thank you for reverting the changeset. I mistakenly deleted the link, and I understand the connectivity based on the road markings. I will be more aware of this in similar situations. commented 2026-02-25 06:46:53 UTC by Kaduna ♦28 |
| 178939007 (Comments: 2) | gwiazdakosza (Discussed changesets: 5) | rzeczywiście, moja pomyłka. wybacz, będę bardziej ostrożny i uważny commented 2026-02-25 06:35:44 UTC by gwiazdakosza ♦2 |
| 179006845 (Comments: 1) | roaringhearloss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:179020264 commented 2026-02-25 06:25:18 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 72100304 (Comments: 1) | Katyacarter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, waterways are always drawn in the direction of the water flow...downhill https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterways commented 2026-02-25 06:24:16 UTC by nevw ♦2,156 |
| 179020136 (Comments: 1) | tyfi (Discussed changesets: 422) | The "North" directional prefix is also fine here, but I don't see it in open county GIS data so omitted it. I didn't bother checking if TIGER still had it, probably does. Did STL county drop its locator grid? commented 2026-02-25 06:22:00 UTC by tyfi ♦438 |
| 170733895 (Comments: 5) | w99-canvec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Korrektur der Daten @limes11 Viele Grüße, Pascal commented 2026-02-25 06:21:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178966118 (Comments: 1) | FDPL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179020014 commented 2026-02-25 06:16:53 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178999380 (Comments: 1) | C-Team605 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Broen hedder 'Bryggebroen' https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379073131 commented 2026-02-25 06:12:07 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,767 |
| 178970938 (Comments: 1) | Ballpoint (Discussed changesets: 3) | Been told it should have joined as it was before edit, have rejoined path and road again. commented 2026-02-25 06:10:59 UTC by Ballpoint ♦3 |
| 178970917 (Comments: 2) | Ballpoint (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ahh shoot! Thanks fortera! I won't make any more changes like this. commented 2026-02-25 06:08:44 UTC by Ballpoint ♦3 |
| 178996533 (Comments: 1) | Timzingemmanuel1o1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, waterways are drawn in the direction that water flows...always downhill toward the sea or an inland lake. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterways commented 2026-02-25 06:00:19 UTC by nevw ♦2,156 |
| 179016756 (Comments: 1) | Shagalovo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте, спасибо за Ваш вклад в OSM. Немного поправил + удалил названия улиц "ул. Полевая" и "ул. Прощальная", которые не смог ... commented 2026-02-25 05:47:29 UTC by Grass-snake ♦266 |
| 178900016 (Comments: 1) | Sammyhawkrad (Discussed changesets: 20) | Revert of 178895298 commented 2026-02-25 05:41:25 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178657459 (Comments: 2) | PhattyMatty (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178676101 commented 2026-02-25 05:35:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178615027 (Comments: 2) | Wolfengo (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178636444 commented 2026-02-25 05:35:30 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178659178 (Comments: 2) | axonsystems (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018859 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:28 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178658466 (Comments: 2) | Maryam Matinisadr (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018858 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:26 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178650055 (Comments: 2) | Salon Thairapy 22 LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018856 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:24 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178652092 (Comments: 2) | Fat Joe’s Burgers & Brew (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018857 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:24 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178649530 (Comments: 2) | 500380360 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018854 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178650000 (Comments: 2) | 500366418 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018855 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178649267 (Comments: 2) | 500369197 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018853 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178649143 (Comments: 2) | 500365754 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018852 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178649029 (Comments: 2) | Silnet Media (Discussed changesets: 7) | ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178686900 commented 2026-02-25 05:35:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178648710 (Comments: 2) | 500374057 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018851 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178647959 (Comments: 2) | 500381862 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018847 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178648530 (Comments: 2) | 22635464 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018848 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178642010 (Comments: 2) | Patti McMullan (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018845 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178628938 (Comments: 2) | Mobile Pizza (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178672734 commented 2026-02-25 05:35:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178628902 (Comments: 2) | Mobile Pizza (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178776268 commented 2026-02-25 05:35:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178623157 (Comments: 2) | Oli Property (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178647224 commented 2026-02-25 05:35:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178628834 (Comments: 2) | Mobile Pizza (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178672811 commented 2026-02-25 05:35:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178618501 (Comments: 2) | Maineclean Solutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018842 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178617812 (Comments: 2) | Invicta Environmental Pest Defense (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018840 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178611489 (Comments: 2) | Paula Napier (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018838 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-25 05:35:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178908021 (Comments: 1) | Khromiy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179018410 commented 2026-02-25 05:19:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 177742583 (Comments: 2) | ZuTam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood, and thanks. commented 2026-02-25 05:06:22 UTC by ZuTam ♦1 |
| 179017993 (Comments: 1) | Leslie Predmore (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-25 05:03:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178883792 (Comments: 1) | Mark Grenfell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179018043 commented 2026-02-25 05:02:50 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 179017964 (Comments: 1) | RFlagg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-25 05:00:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 178889635 (Comments: 1) | Moslim Uddin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179017774 commented 2026-02-25 04:50:21 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178980882 (Comments: 1) | typhoonom (Discussed changesets: 3) | 你好 我是山伏天 在我們還沒確定路線方向時 請勿公開我們探勘的陡行徑 在我們確認與整合地勢後 開發的山徑會架繩擴大上指示 之後確認才會公開 謝之 commented 2026-02-25 04:49:56 UTC by 山伏天 ♦1 |
| 178972510 (Comments: 1) | RobertCarleski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2026-02-25 04:44:26 UTC by jmarchon ♦439 |
| 55095647 (Comments: 1) | Folken (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Folken, offiziell (laut Geodaten BS) gibt es die Adressen a/b/c nicht, nur "59". Ich war vor Ort und auch an den Häusern stehen die nicht (nicht mal die 59 selbst). Weisst du da mehr? commented 2026-02-25 04:42:26 UTC by johsin18 ♦169 |
| 165311724 (Comments: 1) | Ivanbrago (Discussed changesets: 1) | 请不要在name标签里添加非当地语言! Пожалуйста, не добавляйте в именную табличку надписи на языках, отличных от местного! commented 2026-02-25 02:47:58 UTC by HAALAND_ ♦19 |
| 160771978 (Comments: 1) | Dblcut3 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Please don't glue/attach landuse to roads and railways. It makes it an absolute mess to update! commented 2026-02-25 02:37:03 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,087 |
| 178248421 (Comments: 1) | snake21 (Discussed changesets: 61) | please don't attach landuse to roads. commented 2026-02-25 02:29:33 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,087 |
| 178999050 (Comments: 1) | 事由补差 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 建议：请把这些已经在卫星图上难以辨认的铁路要素移至OpenHistoricalMap，谢谢 commented 2026-02-25 02:11:20 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦19 |
| 178976458 (Comments: 1) | Topiours (Discussed changesets: 3) | 感谢您的贡献 commented 2026-02-25 02:03:38 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦19 |
| 179012282 (Comments: 1) | larsenvd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please provide a source on this. commented 2026-02-25 01:57:28 UTC by Omnific ♦225 |
| 179012534 (Comments: 1) | larsenvd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please provide a source on this. commented 2026-02-25 01:57:21 UTC by Omnific ♦225 |
| 178355618 (Comments: 1) | Iamahumanjustlikeyou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lake Tobin is mapped as a multipolygon with all it's tags ... intermittent=yes natural=water salt=yes tidal=no water=lake You should not duplicate these tags on all the outers that form the relation. Those individual ways gener... commented 2026-02-25 01:52:25 UTC by nevw ♦2,156 |
| 132815432 (Comments: 6) | arnalielsewhere (Discussed changesets: 7) | Possibly this could be tagged as amenity=taxi + taxi_vehicle=auto_rickshaw (see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxi_vehicle) commented 2026-02-25 01:33:52 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦169 |
| 178251263 (Comments: 2) | Esson Paz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good morning. It looks like you accidentally dragged some building nodes here and mixed up tags of several different objects. Based on the tag changes that you made it seems that you tried to move a computer repair shop from a building in Berk... commented 2026-02-25 01:24:09 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦169 |
| 179012531 (Comments: 1) | Lê Tuấn Minh (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thông tin thêm: QL.32 đã được cắm mốc sang Đường tránh thị xã Nghĩa Lộ, không còn đi qua khu vực trung tâm nội thị của Nghĩa Lộ nữa commented 2026-02-25 01:12:37 UTC by Lê Tuấn Minh ♦7 |
| 178909215 (Comments: 2) | AlejandroGarcia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahh impecable, lo voy a revisar para tenerlo en cuenta. Muchas gracias. commented 2026-02-25 01:10:31 UTC by AlejandroGarcia ♦1 |
| 179013571 (Comments: 2) | Lê Tuấn Minh (Discussed changesets: 5) | Xin nhắc lại: các bạn đừng chỉnh đường này thành Đường tỉnh 174 nhé, Đường tỉnh 174 chỉ giới hạn từ khu vực Nghĩa Lộ đến trung tâm xã Hạnh Phúc, tỉnh L&agr... commented 2026-02-25 01:07:03 UTC by Lê Tuấn Minh ♦7 |
| 179006517 (Comments: 1) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 80) | 💀💀 commented 2026-02-25 01:05:27 UTC by Yog Sot ♦428 |
| 178865759 (Comments: 4) | 5r22 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sounds reasonable to me. Thanks for the alternative sources, they should be quite helpful :) Have a good one, Kyle commented 2026-02-25 00:59:01 UTC by 5r22 ♦1 |
| 175020879 (Comments: 1) | PanhandleMapGroup (Discussed changesets: 4) | This looks like an automated edit of some sort. I've seen several of these nodes now that have the website tag value be messed up and look like this: "/url?q=http://citycafeamarillo.com/&opi=79508299&..." instead of simply &quo... commented 2026-02-25 00:43:39 UTC by b-jazz ♦814 |
| 179012529 (Comments: 1) | Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hello, This is a large bounding box because in this edit you merely clicked on automatic "suggestions" in iD (fed by the name-suggestion-index) on various places, and also on long-distance railway relations. Since you are an e... commented 2026-02-25 00:34:53 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,756 |
| 174224213 (Comments: 1) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 13) | Relation relation 19795228 deleted - conflicts with address nodes. separation of buildings only has role 'inners'. commented 2026-02-24 23:47:32 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,748 |
| 178677455 (Comments: 2) | yonsantiyon (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello Frans S, Thank you very much for your feedback and for correcting the issues. I truly appreciate it. I sincerely apologize for the serious offset that occurred. I did not realize that my adjustments would move all the buildings un... commented 2026-02-24 23:28:05 UTC by yonsantiyon ♦3 |
| 163079231 (Comments: 2) | Toygar Alak (Discussed changesets: 11) | ???? commented 2026-02-24 23:21:56 UTC by yitimox ♦15 |
| 157854628 (Comments: 1) | Silva1989 (Discussed changesets: 28) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10073014/history this one had no disused:type=route_master is it intentional that it was also changed? commented 2026-02-24 23:16:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 179011678 (Comments: 1) | The Cleaning Authority Tucson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 23:06:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179011693 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oops, completely forgot about the edits I made in Hamilton. My bad. commented 2026-02-24 23:06:42 UTC by Aethonatic ♦38 |
| 179009659 (Comments: 3) | zjustin28 (Discussed changesets: 1) | In OSM, unsanctioned trails are tagged as informal, informal=yes. Additionally, If the trails have posted signs such as no trespassing they can also be tagged as access=private. I'm going to revert this changeset since it does not comply with ou... commented 2026-02-24 23:06:00 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 119296206 (Comments: 1) | JOYCE MARY (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9635326329/history - are you sure about this village here? Is other data added in this edit as broken as this descriptive water name put as a village? commented 2026-02-24 22:53:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 179011289 (Comments: 1) | Fat Cow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 22:51:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178838786 (Comments: 1) | Puzzleduckz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Several of these paths are tagged as PROWs. What was the reason for adding access=private? Any new signage or obstruction? commented 2026-02-24 22:47:35 UTC by ndrw6 ♦80 |
| 179010701 (Comments: 1) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 13) | Error corrected. I've already removed the cluster of buildings. Sorry. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179010701 commented 2026-02-24 22:46:02 UTC by pedr0faria ♦8 |
| 179011108 (Comments: 1) | 18288604 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 22:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
 | 178940503 (Comments: 2) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 13) | Error corrected. I've already removed the cluster of buildings. Sorry. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178940503 commented 2026-02-24 22:45:04 UTC by pedr0faria ♦8 |
| 178941443 (Comments: 1) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 13) | I already deleted it. It was a mistake. sorry --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178941443 commented 2026-02-24 22:31:16 UTC by pedr0faria ♦8 |
| 179010731 (Comments: 1) | Lawrenceburg Home Boutique (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 22:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178988887 (Comments: 1) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 13) | error. Please delet. idont know... --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178988887 commented 2026-02-24 22:22:05 UTC by pedr0faria ♦8 |
| 178988892 (Comments: 1) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 13) | error. sorry --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178988892 commented 2026-02-24 22:20:33 UTC by pedr0faria ♦8 |
| 178971929 (Comments: 4) | polux98489748956 (Discussed changesets: 2) | on est tous passé par là :) si tu as des questions, n'hésites pas. si tu veux, tu peux m'envoyer un message privé si nécessaire commented 2026-02-24 22:09:56 UTC by Marc_ch ♦296 |
| 164568635 (Comments: 5) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 128) | Ok, danke. Habe keine Ortskenntnis, nur den Hinweis gesehen und mich gewundert. Mal schauen ob sich noch wer meldet commented 2026-02-24 22:03:30 UTC by limes11 ♦1,010 |
| 178971748 (Comments: 2) | polux98489748956 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, the tower is build, about to finish soon. commented 2026-02-24 21:56:16 UTC by polux98489748956 ♦2 |
| 178236655 (Comments: 1) | Kurt34 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo Kurt, Haben die Holzkunstwerke wirklich alle ein Namensschild drunter? Daran erinnere ich mich gar nicht... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name Vielleicht subject:wikidata=* Viele Grü&... commented 2026-02-24 21:51:58 UTC by Metzor ♦402 |
| 175208362 (Comments: 4) | antonio000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! I don't think the to the metre accuracy for bus stop positions is terribly important. I'm certainly not going to walk all the routes with a GPS to pinpoint them. :-) But whether a bus stopping position has public_transp... commented 2026-02-24 21:43:28 UTC by kitsis ♦2 |
| 179008480 (Comments: 3) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ja alles klar. Ich war auch nochmal so frei und habe paar Kleinigkeiten korrigiert in dem Bereich, auch das use_sidepath.... commented 2026-02-24 21:43:04 UTC by flex16 ♦57 |
| 178993229 (Comments: 4) | rdelvaca (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi Je kunt evt deze 'tool' gebruiken.. openingsuren-tool http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ Het resultaat even copy past commented 2026-02-24 21:42:32 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179001442 (Comments: 4) | Pablo Rubilar (Discussed changesets: 1) | El lugar es el exacto, tengo imágenes y ruta en gps para compartir commented 2026-02-24 21:41:03 UTC by Pablo Rubilar ♦1 |
| 179009298 (Comments: 1) | ambachtelijk hoeveroomijs 20 verschillende soorten ijsautomaat altijd open (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 21:39:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179000376 (Comments: 1) | cubone123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Witaj! Chciałbym Ciebie zapytać, czy przejście dla pieszych na ulicy Szkolnej (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13596103146) w ogóle istnieje. Na zdjęciach lotniczych nie widzę go, a zadeklarowałeś, że to na ich podstawie to przej... commented 2026-02-24 21:38:00 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦66 |
| 179000239 (Comments: 1) | cubone123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Witaj! Cieszę się, że postanowiłeś dołączyć do OpenStreetMap! Chciałbym jednak zwrócić Tobie uwagę na kilka błędów. 1. Oznaczyłeś drogę biegnącą przez wieś (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32942740, https://ww... commented 2026-02-24 21:33:59 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦66 |
| 179009192 (Comments: 1) | Cheswick Oakmont (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 21:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178858316 (Comments: 3) | quadrupleberry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, that was my mistake. That’s definitely a village green! commented 2026-02-24 21:33:39 UTC by quadrupleberry ♦1 |
| 179008962 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Смольников (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 21:27:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179008955 (Comments: 1) | Mona's Pet X-ing At Highview (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 21:27:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178634676 (Comments: 3) | Oberlausitzer42 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo Michael! Bist du bitte mal so nett und greifst hier regulierend ein? Es macht keinen Spaß mehr. Ich hatte es gerade erst vor 2 Tagen wieder korrigiert. So geht das nun schon eine ganze Weile hin und her... https://www.opens... commented 2026-02-24 21:27:12 UTC by BrummsLee ♦37 |
| 179008199 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 98) | forgot to add road name at the end there, the end of the changeset comment was intended to be "at i95 and SR 860 Miami Gardens Drive." commented 2026-02-24 21:22:20 UTC by Udarian ♦664 |
| 178986335 (Comments: 1) | bargendel57 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ברוכים הבאים ותודה על התרומה! ניתן ומומלץ לישר את זווית הבניין ע"י לחיצה ימנית עליו ואז Square או בקיצור המקלדת Q עוד הנחיות שימושי... commented 2026-02-24 21:21:38 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦715 |
| 179008498 (Comments: 1) | 500384615 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 21:12:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178874270 (Comments: 10) | Bolbuyk (Discussed changesets: 16) | Mooi bijgewerkt. Groeten, Bolbuyk commented 2026-02-24 21:12:35 UTC by Bolbuyk ♦11 |
| 179008394 (Comments: 1) | The Insurance Exchange (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 21:09:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179007973 (Comments: 2) | Pedro_10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm correcting a mistake. There was a bug on my PC in JOSM and I've been copying many buildings that don't exist. I wanted to agree. commented 2026-02-24 21:06:05 UTC by Pedro_10 ♦1 |
| 179007243 (Comments: 1) | aki007 (Discussed changesets: 9) | first time I've really done anything with turn lanes. I'd appreciate if someone could have a look at my edit commented 2026-02-24 20:56:59 UTC by aki007 ♦15 |
| 143717914 (Comments: 1) | Marcelo Andres (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hola Marcelo. Si los terrenos están pegados; dibujarlos pegados. Lo hice yo. saludos commented 2026-02-24 20:41:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 175374665 (Comments: 2) | segi (Discussed changesets: 28) | dík, opravené commented 2026-02-24 20:40:02 UTC by segi ♦41 |
| 178916399 (Comments: 1) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 49) | De tag sport=fencing was correct. De waarde hoort in het Engels te zijn, dus fencing i.p.v. schermen. commented 2026-02-24 20:36:50 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,093 |
| 179007297 (Comments: 1) | Jackson Building Supply (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 20:36:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179007239 (Comments: 1) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hier sind noch ein paar Symbole auf den Wegweisern. Muss ich mir noch mal anschauen. commented 2026-02-24 20:32:51 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦29 |
| 178980052 (Comments: 4) | Thomabre (Discussed changesets: 6) | Das ist die Frage. Der Grundriss ist rechteckig, nur das Dach hat zwei Kuppel. Die Wikipedia Verknüpfung stelle ich noch her commented 2026-02-24 20:28:48 UTC by Thomabre ♦2 |
| 178990231 (Comments: 1) | Kinga | Edycje (Discussed changesets: 59) | Widzę, że dodajesz sporo adresów. Zachęcam, żeby nie robić tego z nieurzędowych źródeł (źródła też brakuje w opisie zmian), bo często to buble. Nie wiem jak w przypadku innych, ale ten jest nieprawi... commented 2026-02-24 20:27:20 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,217 |
| 173331896 (Comments: 1) | kayle (Discussed changesets: 25) | Neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442437981 commented 2026-02-24 20:23:08 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 173527473 (Comments: 2) | segi (Discussed changesets: 28) | díki, opravené. commented 2026-02-24 20:21:52 UTC by segi ♦41 |
| 179006736 (Comments: 1) | Greg Mahoney - State Farm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 20:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178963199 (Comments: 2) | Baxter Genea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Recuperado nodo estadístico eliminado por usuario novel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179006850 commented 2026-02-24 20:21:20 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦264 |
| 178504427 (Comments: 1) | DareDJ (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi, Can you please write more detailed changeset comments about what your changes are? Fixed logical issue on all changesets isn't very helpful when trying to look through history. Thanks, Phoebe commented 2026-02-24 20:19:09 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦49 |
| 173345058 (Comments: 1) | Mirecnet (Discussed changesets: 141) | Neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442514329 commented 2026-02-24 20:18:39 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 179000765 (Comments: 3) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 135) | Исках да вкарам адреси. Но като не съм абсолютно убеден в статуса на сградите, по-добре е да го поотложа... Наистина най-добре ти да ги види... commented 2026-02-24 20:15:09 UTC by Fraxi ♦274 |
| 171988044 (Comments: 1) | spikej555 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks good! Good job! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171988044 commented 2026-02-24 20:10:45 UTC by crazycolbster ♦12 |
| 178961913 (Comments: 1) | letihu (Discussed changesets: 91) | Hallo letihu, ich habe die Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht aus folgenden Gründen: 1. die Daten sind redundand und über die administrativen Grenzen bereits festgelegt. Es ist einfacher zu pflegen und daher hier in... commented 2026-02-24 20:09:24 UTC by BlackyP8 ♦27 |
| 178576687 (Comments: 3) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 67) | Le problème, c'est que ce sont des références circulaires. Les wiki citent OSM. OSM cite les wikis... commented 2026-02-24 20:03:55 UTC by Eric S ♦37 |
| 178644768 (Comments: 4) | dmfr (Discussed changesets: 29) | Feito commented 2026-02-24 20:03:44 UTC by topolusitania ♦230 |
| 174496730 (Comments: 1) | firstcalljewel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this the official account for First Call Jewl? lol. Looks good! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174496730 commented 2026-02-24 20:03:30 UTC by crazycolbster ♦12 |
| 178677259 (Comments: 1) | Maty_SK (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdravím, čo to je za návestidlo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13572785006 commented 2026-02-24 20:01:45 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 179005475 (Comments: 1) | DyArt1980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-24 20:01:37 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178685267 (Comments: 1) | Chris Taylor-Guest (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bridges without names have been given incorrect names in this changeset. commented 2026-02-24 20:01:02 UTC by honapak ♦6 |
| 172572928 (Comments: 4) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 391) | Yes, it's indeed a single (I spoke to the person managing the campsite today.) I then merged the info from both nodes into a polygon that also covers the building containing the campsite amenities. commented 2026-02-24 19:57:43 UTC by bikepiper ♦20 |
| 179004695 (Comments: 1) | sistemas cba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap. El render tarda un rato para actualizarse, y ese tiempo varía en los niveles de zoom. La ddición/actualizacón del mapa está realizada. Les invitamos/recomiendo entrar a este ... commented 2026-02-24 19:53:46 UTC by Diego Krein ♦43 |
| 175131834 (Comments: 1) | citizenfive (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! We're excited to have you here! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175131834 commented 2026-02-24 19:52:36 UTC by crazycolbster ♦12 |
| 179005633 (Comments: 1) | Mobile Works Audio & Detailing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 19:51:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177703804 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 161) | The name is correct. Thanks for adding it! I didn't think about doing so. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177703804 commented 2026-02-24 19:50:18 UTC by crazycolbster ♦12 |
| 178993046 (Comments: 1) | Maty_SK (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdravím, signal_box je stavadlo alebo stanovište. Nemyslím, že sa jedná o jedno z nich. predtým to bolo nastavené ako výhybňa crossover, čo bolo správne. commented 2026-02-24 19:48:16 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 175045222 (Comments: 2) | Maty_SK (Discussed changesets: 6) | Súhlasím, tu sa ešte nič nestavia. commented 2026-02-24 19:45:22 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 179004594 (Comments: 1) | AhmetCK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-24 19:40:53 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179005244 (Comments: 1) | Vivarium Coffee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 19:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179004317 (Comments: 1) | Jarek 🚲 (Discussed changesets: 119) | Oops, incomplete. Continued in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179004555 and I also added commented with reasoning there commented 2026-02-24 19:35:00 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦364 |
| 178932642 (Comments: 1) | oldmanbogey15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, could you check these golf areas? Some of them have strange tags like "name_Org2" or strange names. Thanks! commented 2026-02-24 19:33:57 UTC by mueschel ♦6,938 |
| 179002816 (Comments: 2) | Hiskidnl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tip .. Let er op dat je de paden doorverbind met ander wegen of paden. Het zal anders niet routeren. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-24 19:32:48 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179002242 (Comments: 1) | ilovesoup (Discussed changesets: 1) | I deleted the node again, since you already added it in your previous changeset. So that there are no duplicates in the map. My changeset: https://www.osm.org/changeset/179004982 commented 2026-02-24 19:32:17 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦22 |
| 178820890 (Comments: 1) | George McMann (Discussed changesets: 7) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127501566 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines sh... commented 2026-02-24 19:29:28 UTC by b-jazz ♦814 |
| 179000958 (Comments: 1) | MaykThewessen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De naam van de centrale komt nu 2x voor op de kaart. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-24 19:23:38 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179004534 (Comments: 1) | Chosen Towing & Recovery (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 19:21:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 138518599 (Comments: 1) | Nate Wessel (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hey Nate, FYI I set lanes on Dundas back to 4 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179004555, see comments there for reasoning commented 2026-02-24 19:20:17 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦364 |
| 143706444 (Comments: 2) | SUPER HEROS 67 (Discussed changesets: 7) | ENG : Hey, Yes, I added buildings to the “Quarmannel Circuit” because they are part of that circuit. SUPER HEROS 67 FR : Hey, Effectivement, j'ai rajouter des bâtiments au "Circuit du Qua... commented 2026-02-24 19:19:32 UTC by SUPER HEROS 67 ♦29 |
| 178997942 (Comments: 1) | matsvdg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-24 19:18:47 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 163114938 (Comments: 3) | Custodio Márquez García (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gracias por la información. Estaría bien enlazar algo con la laguna para que se tenga una referencia, ya que genera dudas. Un saludo commented 2026-02-24 19:03:59 UTC by kapazao ♦995 |
| 179003758 (Comments: 1) | Walter W Schultz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 18:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178969518 (Comments: 1) | unvisited3z72 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! When you upload changes, please use the changeset comment field to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added address numbers to buildings" or "Added toilets from survey." Here are some more e... commented 2026-02-24 18:53:33 UTC by impiaaa ♦459 |
| 178523682 (Comments: 1) | gasdriver_de (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hallo gasdriver_de, wenn ich es richtig sehe, hast du die Querung https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8767403622/history/5 von crossing=unmarked zu crossing=island geändert. crossing=island wird mittlerweile nicht mehr verwendet, stattdess... commented 2026-02-24 18:50:50 UTC by burrscurr ♦94 |
| 179003399 (Comments: 1) | 10097499 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 18:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179000933 (Comments: 1) | Joshua Pranger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OSM.. Probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Mvg eggie commented 2026-02-24 18:47:20 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179001227 (Comments: 1) | Joshua Pranger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Joshua.. Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Mvg eggie commented 2026-02-24 18:45:42 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178985809 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 420) | thanks :) commented 2026-02-24 18:45:17 UTC by Piagno ♦125 |
| 178200274 (Comments: 3) | Морковкин (Discussed changesets: 1) | В общем-то их можно было оставить, вполне допустимо их рисовать. Прадва, некоторым такие дорожки не нравятся, но раз вы же их и нарисовали,... commented 2026-02-24 18:44:49 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 178997976 (Comments: 1) | SJ30Y (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dag SJ Probeer svp op de adresnode bij te taggen. Mvg eggie commented 2026-02-24 18:43:53 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 179002911 (Comments: 1) | rGRAYphotog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 18:36:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179002731 (Comments: 1) | hgnanh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 18:30:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 179000000 (Comments: 1) | Andreasl01 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 179 mil woo commented 2026-02-24 18:30:35 UTC by kylor ♦29 |
| 178978866 (Comments: 2) | Thomabre (Discussed changesets: 6) | Die St. Anna Str. ist seit 4 Jahren auf Höhe Hausnummer 25 durch eine Baustelle gesperrt. Diese Sperre soll laut Stadtratsbeschluss bestehen bleiben. Eine Durchfahrt für KFZ ist nicht möglich commented 2026-02-24 18:19:52 UTC by Thomabre ♦2 |
| 179000133 (Comments: 1) | Good Mechanical Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 17:27:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177499078 (Comments: 1) | randomhacks (Discussed changesets: 5) | hi there, thanks for trying to tidy up the paths around Machynlleth! I've merged the way here as its duplicated with the track which has the relevant PRoW tags on it already. https://osm.org/way/1468995135 In general OSM tries to m... commented 2026-02-24 17:19:15 UTC by ohmanger ♦42 |
| 178950256 (Comments: 1) | Kevlar643 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Descriptive name like name=Residence are not used. Tags can do the trick. I removed the name tag --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178950256 commented 2026-02-24 17:15:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 178981454 (Comments: 1) | Thomabre (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thomabre, ich sehe das du neu bei OSM bist, kennst du schon die änderungssatz-kommentare? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments. Das macht es anderen leichter nachzuvollziehen welche änderung du vorgenommen hast... commented 2026-02-24 17:14:49 UTC by qkaz ♦6 |
| 178981684 (Comments: 1) | Thomabre (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thomabre, ich sehe das du neu bei OSM bist, kennst du schon die änderungssatz-kommentare? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments. Das macht es anderen leichter nachzuvollziehen welche änderung du vorgenommen hast... commented 2026-02-24 17:14:37 UTC by qkaz ♦6 |
| 178982015 (Comments: 1) | Thomabre (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thomabre, ich sehe das du neu bei OSM bist, kennst du schon die änderungssatz-kommentare? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments. Das macht es anderen leichter nachzuvollziehen welche änderung du vorgenommen hast... commented 2026-02-24 17:14:09 UTC by qkaz ♦6 |
| 178999375 (Comments: 1) | crankywatts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 17:09:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178962259 (Comments: 1) | GyDomonkos (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren ... commented 2026-02-24 16:48:49 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,366 |
| 178827587 (Comments: 1) | Deepika M (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Accurate mapped. Here are a few multi story buildings which need to be mapped over the rooflines and moved to their footprint. Check this footage please. https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL ... commented 2026-02-24 16:47:43 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 178997306 (Comments: 1) | mykhal (Discussed changesets: 1) | (.. well, not exactly "revert" in wikipedia/wikidata/mediawiki sense) commented 2026-02-24 16:37:43 UTC by mykhal ♦3 |
| 178973168 (Comments: 1) | vietnam321 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Tôi nhắn lại vào changeset bạn chỉnh sửa ở khu vực Nghĩa Lộ nhé mà vừa nãy mình nhắn nhầm vào changeset khác của bạn, mình là người địa phương ở... commented 2026-02-24 16:36:46 UTC by Lê Tuấn Minh ♦7 |
| 178989607 (Comments: 1) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 13) | error --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178989607 commented 2026-02-24 16:34:39 UTC by pedr0faria ♦8 |
| 176100134 (Comments: 1) | Piene (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Piene Hier hat sich der Fehlerteufel eingeschlichen. Der way/464355899 hatte zuvor ein cycleway:left-track. Das war korrekt. Folgende Straßenstücke haben nicht 'cycleway:both' sondern nur 'cycleway:right'... commented 2026-02-24 16:26:13 UTC by kre777 ♦16 |
| 178964148 (Comments: 1) | freakRHO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Probablemente estas confundiendo el tipo de establecimiento, que se llame "bar" en muchos paises, incluido Uruguay, no tiene que ver con que se le ponga amenity=bar que es segun esta definicion: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:... commented 2026-02-24 16:23:36 UTC by muralito ♦2,122 |
| 178974145 (Comments: 1) | vietnam321 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Chào bạn, mình là người địa phương ở khu vực Nghĩa Lộ, tỉnh Lào Cai và đã khảo sát nhiều nơi ở khu vực Nghĩa Lộ và những khu vực xung quanh và mì... commented 2026-02-24 16:18:44 UTC by Lê Tuấn Minh ♦7 |
| 178997019 (Comments: 1) | Al's Transmission Service (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 16:18:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 134654014 (Comments: 1) | user_5589 (Discussed changesets: 59) | yes commented 2026-02-24 16:16:04 UTC by mudpuppy ♦1 |
| 178996644 (Comments: 1) | 500368350 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 16:06:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178996175 (Comments: 1) | fmc_3 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ergänzung Changesetkommentar: ...und Parkhindernisse in Elisen- und Steinstraße erfasst. commented 2026-02-24 15:57:56 UTC by fmc_3 ♦14 |
| 178979189 (Comments: 8) | Brusje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Denk ook dat het nu klopt Groet, eggie commented 2026-02-24 15:57:17 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178995933 (Comments: 1) | 500167833 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 15:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178995849 (Comments: 1) | Pierrot2144 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 15:51:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178995801 (Comments: 1) | ASMustis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 15:51:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 58799621 (Comments: 2) | socketpair (Discussed changesets: 2) | (.. also ping original https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315089439/history/1 author @Kilkenni ) commented 2026-02-24 15:44:21 UTC by mykhal ♦3 |
| 178354832 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 41) | Променям https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476144687 от =yes на =construction, защото не се вижда от спътниковите снимки да има сграда там. commented 2026-02-24 15:40:08 UTC by Fraxi ♦274 |
| 107379335 (Comments: 2) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 22) | Effectivement cela date et mon souvenir s'estompe. Il s'agissait d'une étape sur la voie verte proche. Je pencherais plutôt pour la deuxième solution avec quand même possibilité de prendre son petit d&e... commented 2026-02-24 15:39:34 UTC by l3BAM ♦70 |
| 178991034 (Comments: 1) | Ikbal Harun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Halo 👋, sama seperti komentar saya di sini https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178993500#c1560100 , wiharanya dipetakan 2 kali, malah yang sebelumnya tag-nya lebih lengkap. commented 2026-02-24 15:39:01 UTC by wirabdillah ♦3 |
| 117301822 (Comments: 1) | Günter-CW (Discussed changesets: 31) | Die Tags access=yes und access=permissive kennzeichnen ein Merkmal als zugänglich für alle Verkehrsträger. Dies ist fast nie der Fall, und stattdessen sollten genauere Tags verwendet werden. Für weitere Einzelheiten siehe Wiki. |
| 177939456 (Comments: 2) | threefoursixninefour (Discussed changesets: 15) | I've re-added ref=A67 to the carriageways within the service areas; motorway service areas in the Netherlands are considered part of the numbered road. commented 2026-02-24 15:31:28 UTC by JeroenvanderGun ♦192 |
| 178993500 (Comments: 1) | Ikbal Harun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Halo, Wihara tersebut sudah dipetakan sebagai building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026904629 . Kenapa harus ditambahkan node baru lagi ya? Kalau way tersebut masih kurang akurat, sebaiknya tag-nya ditambahkan ke buildingnya, jangan buat node b... commented 2026-02-24 15:30:36 UTC by wirabdillah ♦3 |
| 178994522 (Comments: 1) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 17) | Interestingly, the old 50mph limit signs have not been removed adjacent to Galgate Bridge, so there is a different speed limit going north than the limit going south. I've left the lower limit in place, as I suspect the old signs will be removed... commented 2026-02-24 15:20:33 UTC by Dezza ♦25 |
| 175524296 (Comments: 1) | 聽見AED (Discussed changesets: 660) | 位置需再確認，跑到校門口了 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524296 commented 2026-02-24 15:11:52 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,242 |
| 178978963 (Comments: 1) | Repasus (Discussed changesets: 1) | En textos en español (name:es) se usa de manera correcta "A Guarda": https://www.abc.es/espana/galicia/abci-guardia-civil-incauta-mas-2500-petardos-venta-ilegal-guarda-201808141954_noticia.html; https://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2008/01... commented 2026-02-24 15:07:36 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,751 |
| 178937675 (Comments: 2) | CeesKoek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je hebt helemaal gelijk, niet bij nagedacht. Bedankt. commented 2026-02-24 15:05:57 UTC by CeesKoek ♦1 |
| 178978669 (Comments: 1) | sergej zhiliackov (Discussed changesets: 9) | Нижний, вообще-то commented 2026-02-24 15:01:56 UTC by yelisey90 ♦413 |
| 178913559 (Comments: 4) | poopqqq (Discussed changesets: 1) | yeah, sure. you can just copy other lines and paste it, or you can also use the visual editor. Thank you! commented 2026-02-24 14:59:40 UTC by hahae ♦23 |
| 178993474 (Comments: 1) | Rollies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 14:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 175987790 (Comments: 1) | Pepe Sánchez de Wu (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola Pepe Sánchez de Wu, Se han añadido considerablemente las etiquetas foot=no en las carreteras de Córdoba. Si bien las restricciones peatonales en la Avenida de Circunvalación Agustín Tosco coinciden con l... commented 2026-02-24 14:56:42 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦84 |
| 178971950 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The same building geometry issue continues after prior clarification. Adjacent buildings must use shared nodes or correct structure. Further repetition may require review. commented 2026-02-24 14:53:56 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178993225 (Comments: 1) | Holy Smokes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 14:51:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178966792 (Comments: 1) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hello. You've created 7 new countries with the same name United Kingdom. This is obviously incorrect. Reverted. -- Best regards, Alexey commented 2026-02-24 14:50:50 UTC by azakh-world ♦288 |
| 178990148 (Comments: 3) | thijsbek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! Dat is inderdaad per ongeluk gegaan. commented 2026-02-24 14:47:27 UTC by thijsbek ♦2 |
| 178731175 (Comments: 1) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 34) | Sveiki, kas šajā vietā ir mainījies? Pēdējo reizi te vēl bija uz sāniem iebraucams https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1146228850708870&focus=photo . Vai tagad šeit ir zāle vai kas cits? commented 2026-02-24 14:45:10 UTC by HellMap ♦837 |
| 178948587 (Comments: 2) | Yesofcourse (Discussed changesets: 2) | Az épület alatt ott valójában egy út megy el, bent az épület alatt található a telefon. commented 2026-02-24 14:40:10 UTC by Yesofcourse ♦1 |
| 178992291 (Comments: 1) | Louther (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. No hacemos duplicados por esas razones. Los navegadores deberían corregir eso. No se hace a nivel de mapa. Saludos commented 2026-02-24 14:35:11 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 178880696 (Comments: 9) | welzheimerwald (Discussed changesets: 56) | Bonjour Marc, ich habe mich nicht über die Kritik lächerlich gemacht (sorry, kurz mit deepl übersetzt, keine Ahnung obs stimmt), sondern über die rechthaberische Art des Verfassers. Seine Aussage „aber aktuell sind die al... commented 2026-02-24 14:31:46 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦92 |
| 178992091 (Comments: 1) | Eagle Automotive and Transmission (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 14:30:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178729099 (Comments: 1) | STBuilder (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is not a detached house, this is an apartment building. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Ddetached commented 2026-02-24 14:29:32 UTC by HellMap ♦837 |
| 178953116 (Comments: 2) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-24 14:23:58 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178970398 (Comments: 2) | lambalicious (Discussed changesets: 6) | Moví los semáforos detrás de los cruces también. commented 2026-02-24 14:22:44 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 178970463 (Comments: 1) | lambalicious (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. El only left es redundante. No hace daño, pero no hace falta agregarlo, ya que es la única opción físicamente viable en ese cruce. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2026-02-24 14:17:12 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 178987499 (Comments: 2) | Styvooo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci pour la suggestion commented 2026-02-24 14:16:26 UTC by Styvooo ♦1 |
| 160355016 (Comments: 12) | jukkatp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olen nyt samaa mieltä kanssasi. Alun perin tulkitsin tuon jalkakäytäväksi, mutta se onkin muu väylä, josta kaupunki käyttää nimitystä puistokäytävä. Vieressä oleva Kiikku on liiken... commented 2026-02-24 14:14:17 UTC by jukkatp ♦1 |
| 178469561 (Comments: 3) | Hendrik Helsper (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zu 2 und 3: Das Problem ist hier, was hier de-jure ausgeschildert ist und was de-facto tatsächlich gemeint ist und für OSM spielt Letzteres eher die Rolle als Ersteres. Eine Fußgängerstraße mag ja zwar rechtlich keine B&... commented 2026-02-24 14:14:02 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦255 |
| 178989740 (Comments: 1) | Louther (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. A qué lado? las direcciones se ponen sobre las casas, no la calle misma. La moví al poniente. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178989740 ... commented 2026-02-24 14:13:21 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 178988199 (Comments: 1) | c1234h (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De relatie van de vaarroute heb ik hersteld. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-24 13:52:09 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
 | 178737672 (Comments: 5) | ibanez (Discussed changesets: 15) | I understand to some degree. But if then we would follow the logic that it needs more work for the renderer we might as well not put buildings at all, just urban area/rural area, or not put any level of detail. I am not so experienced... commented 2026-02-24 13:50:06 UTC by pomodoren ♦2 |
 | 178989878 (Comments: 1) | lantern45 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 13:42:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178889078 (Comments: 10) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 103) | "Ok, jak to mám zlepšit, aby to nebylo chaotické?" .. zahodit to a začít lépe, návod je. A časem to dojde i tomu belgičanovi nebo holanďanovi a Ananasu, že jejich koncept "all in one"... commented 2026-02-24 13:42:38 UTC by HaPe-CZ ♦105 |
| 178889060 (Comments: 8) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 103) | Anas masuris .. proč ho do toho tahat? Zase nějakej přizvanej kamarádek, kterej hraje na stejnou notu jako ty? Je to trapné si takto sjednávat podporu, navíc od cizinců, jen aby jsi byl s nimi kamarád jo? Zamysl... commented 2026-02-24 13:40:03 UTC by HaPe-CZ ♦105 |
| 178945637 (Comments: 2) | Veterini (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, effectivement j'ai parfois ce message que j'ignore habituellement. J'ai du aller trop vite cette fois ci. Merci à toi pour la correction commented 2026-02-24 13:38:15 UTC by Veterini ♦1 |
| 178982185 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 936) | Thank you ;) commented 2026-02-24 13:33:01 UTC by f_gonella ♦46 |
| 178376750 (Comments: 3) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 14) | Non en effet : way/1476281456 plutôt. commented 2026-02-24 13:22:33 UTC by Ltrlg ♦144 |
| 178988483 (Comments: 1) | kartler175 (Discussed changesets: 139) | proper multipolygon member roles completed commented 2026-02-24 13:13:44 UTC by kartler175 ♦573 |
| 178647904 (Comments: 2) | Vi2727 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @mueschel Hello, sorry. It was meant to indicate how long the restriction applies, but I set it up incorrectly. I should have removed it now. commented 2026-02-24 13:12:45 UTC by Vi2727 ♦0 |
| 178988038 (Comments: 1) | JaKuKu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 13:06:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178977394 (Comments: 3) | ad new cosmetics - ad Beauty GmbH - Experte zur dauerhaften Haarentfernung (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, I am a new mapper and still learning the rules. I am not a 'SEO spammer', but the owner/representative of this local business (ad new cosmetics) and wanted to add it to the map. I apologize if I accidentally deleted existing features... commented 2026-02-24 12:46:28 UTC by ad new cosmetics - ad Beauty GmbH - Experte zur dauerhaften Haarentfernung ♦2 |
| 178974002 (Comments: 2) | ad new cosmetics - ad Beauty GmbH - Experte zur dauerhaften Haarentfernung (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, I am a new mapper and still learning the rules. I am not a 'SEO spammer', but the owner/representative of this local business (ad new cosmetics) and wanted to add it to the map. I apologize if I accidentally deleted existing features... commented 2026-02-24 12:44:37 UTC by ad new cosmetics - ad Beauty GmbH - Experte zur dauerhaften Haarentfernung ♦2 |
| 178979196 (Comments: 1) | 事由补差 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 感谢您们对沪昆线沿线旧铁路做出的贡献，欢迎您加入osm中文社群，QQ290278518 commented 2026-02-24 12:40:10 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦19 |
| 178986734 (Comments: 1) | Sedir Life Şark Odası Sedir İmalatı (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 12:39:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178986670 (Comments: 1) | deivh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 12:36:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178931950 (Comments: 1) | sssonic21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178986638 commented 2026-02-24 12:34:13 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178242425 (Comments: 1) | Victor Dps (Discussed changesets: 14) | Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093167942 Ne s'agit-il pas plutôt d'une cheminée d'usine ? J'ai regardé l'ouvrage de référence sur les fortifs de Cambrai et il n'y a... commented 2026-02-24 12:25:08 UTC by Arflha ♦30 |
| 137831671 (Comments: 1) | Victor Dps (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bonjour, La porte Royale et la citadelle sont du XVIe siècle, le tag "historic:civilization"="medieval" me semble inadapté. commented 2026-02-24 12:14:19 UTC by Arflha ♦30 |
| 175661092 (Comments: 3) | able-macaroni-pacemaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Alexb60 Thank you! commented 2026-02-24 12:06:21 UTC by able-macaroni-pacemaker ♦1 |
| 178970206 (Comments: 2) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | ok commented 2026-02-24 12:05:58 UTC by masoudghorbani ♦14 |
| 178924138 (Comments: 2) | ffg5087 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 178983384 commented 2026-02-24 11:45:04 UTC by ajmat ♦16 |
| 178925625 (Comments: 7) | Slavyanin50 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1. This is self-contradictory to use `tourism=attraction` 2. There's not one "the trail". There can be many routes, where others are free to climb or cut through. commented 2026-02-24 11:43:40 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 178928943 (Comments: 1) | j16sdiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1. Unprefixed `website=` is used for unique pages of the feature specifically, eg branches, where `brand:website=` will be used for domain of brands 2. Almost all roads don't have `website=` 3. This is for the project, not the road when ... commented 2026-02-24 11:42:09 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,762 |
| 178984113 (Comments: 1) | Lilalolina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 11:39:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 170353081 (Comments: 4) | StefDeGreef (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Julcnx, sorry for late reply, lots of work on my side. I totally understand the issues. As you're very active on Thai OSM, I let you judge the relevant course of action. I would understand if you remove the track I've added on the Thai s... commented 2026-02-24 11:16:35 UTC by StefDeGreef ♦13 |
 | 178822504 (Comments: 2) | KempsValley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi soliMM, This was an accident, and I have restored this node. Thanks for letting me know! commented 2026-02-24 11:00:13 UTC by KempsValley ♦1 |
| 178917658 (Comments: 1) | מגבית (Discussed changesets: 8) | hi, about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13591456717 - there is no אצ''ל street around. If there is one, can you map it? commented 2026-02-24 10:39:56 UTC by Sanniu ♦626 |
| 178906703 (Comments: 6) | rbuffat (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ciao Renè , sono Pozzo il referente per la sentieristica del CAI e della Sosecp per il territorio del VCO . I percorsi da te identificati sono oggetto della revisione in atto con IPLA (regione Piemonte) alcuni cartelli andranno rimossi e in ... commented 2026-02-24 10:35:05 UTC by DAVIDE POZZO ♦4 |
| 178939211 (Comments: 1) | rfefe989 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178981154 commented 2026-02-24 10:32:28 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 176517406 (Comments: 4) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 298) | Ahh okay. Thanks for the explanation. It’s too easy to not notice an existing relation on iD. commented 2026-02-24 10:32:22 UTC by wa_wheatbelt ♦7 |
| 178879621 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM15 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Здравствуйте. Спасибо большое за исправление. Невнимательно указала. Прошу прощения commented 2026-02-24 10:09:58 UTC by Ozon OSM15 ♦15 |
| 178965271 (Comments: 1) | Isabella Carrillo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178980103 commented 2026-02-24 10:09:07 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
 | 178776841 (Comments: 2) | NossobRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello BerryTrails! Thank you for restoring the connection with your local knowledge. Happy mapping! commented 2026-02-24 10:06:44 UTC by NossobRiver ♦2 |
| 178979651 (Comments: 1) | APS Environmental (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 10:00:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178878349 (Comments: 4) | marc__marc (Discussed changesets: 50) | thanks for your review commented 2026-02-24 09:54:30 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,483 |
| 178979323 (Comments: 1) | Primebuildersaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 09:51:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177480353 (Comments: 1) | Манаков Cергей Александрович (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее. |
| 178973727 (Comments: 1) | Im Fokus (Discussed changesets: 19) | depperterweise gleich wieder ein Fehler in der Änderungsbeschreibung. Also nun aber richtig: Spiek, nicht Spieck commented 2026-02-24 09:44:49 UTC by Im Fokus ♦26 |
| 163065657 (Comments: 1) | Ökkel (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bitte beim Rück-Umzug der Hundefriseurin nicht nur den node/4425323510 verschieben, sondern gerne auch die addr:street usw. ändern. Erledigt mit changeset/178978951 commented 2026-02-24 09:40:09 UTC by Hb- ♦339 |
| 176854616 (Comments: 1) | LümmelMaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass das Gartenhäuschen eine Hausnummer hat. Kannst du vor Ort gucken, welches Gebäude wirklich die 27 dran stehen hat und dann zwei von den dreien un-taggen? commented 2026-02-24 09:36:40 UTC by wungasaurus ♦16 |
| 178775758 (Comments: 1) | harg (Discussed changesets: 29) | thanks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5172272 commented 2026-02-24 09:29:35 UTC by Harry Wood ♦106 |
| 178882861 (Comments: 2) | Iamahumanjustlikeyou (Discussed changesets: 2) | note that the waterways may have been pointing the wrong direction before you edited the area as many are. commented 2026-02-24 09:25:32 UTC by nevw ♦2,156 |
| 178947580 (Comments: 1) | LMF_manna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178977922 commented 2026-02-24 09:14:05 UTC by 007Transformer ♦24 |
| 178940943 (Comments: 1) | Steve_p78 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178977623 commented 2026-02-24 09:06:26 UTC by 007Transformer ♦24 |
| 178976676 (Comments: 1) | The Cleaning Authority Olympia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 08:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178395799 (Comments: 3) | Plumf (Discussed changesets: 421) | L'erreur osmose est lié à la différence de valeur entre route et route_master. Pour iD, les valeurs sont suggérées par NSI et ne prennent en compte que partiellement le contexte local, et il y a en plus des ... commented 2026-02-24 08:43:49 UTC by mga_geo ♦291 |
| 177654738 (Comments: 2) | AvdK_Hiker (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you for pointing me to that discussion, very interesting. However, it seems that the discussion is still ongoing. When a conclusion is drawn, yes, this route can be "nomalised". My focus on this route has been to update the route r... commented 2026-02-24 08:34:55 UTC by AvdK_Hiker ♦6 |
| 178964691 (Comments: 1) | isabella kitty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178976372 commented 2026-02-24 08:34:35 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178932419 (Comments: 1) | SpecializedRider (Discussed changesets: 13) | These tailings dams could be years away so I have changed the tagging to proposed:man_made=tailings_pond commented 2026-02-24 08:33:21 UTC by tastrax ♦1,188 |
| 178961387 (Comments: 1) | Alklanet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space Use amenity=parking_space to map a single parking space on a parking lot. Je hoeft niet nog eens grote vlakken toe te voegen, maar evt wel de aparte vakken. Voorbeel... commented 2026-02-24 08:27:52 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178955313 (Comments: 1) | Chris6673 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 178975895 commented 2026-02-24 08:24:08 UTC by 007Transformer ♦24 |
| 164178114 (Comments: 1) | benewig (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, gibt es mittlerweile womöglich neue Informationen über die Brücke? offiziell ist es nicht mehr als Baustelle gelistet und eine K-Straße wird wohl kaum wegen einer Brücke 1 Jahr gesperrt sein https://baustellen.sachsen... commented 2026-02-24 08:17:56 UTC by sembelst134 ♦26 |
| 178932724 (Comments: 1) | Worldtraveller11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178975535 commented 2026-02-24 08:13:52 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 170307678 (Comments: 1) | Viktoren29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, fakt sa záhradkárska osada volá "Futbalové ihrisko"? commented 2026-02-24 08:11:04 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,080 |
| 178949740 (Comments: 1) | soflor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao soflor, come puoi verificare da tutte le fonti (https://www.comuneancona.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/AllegatoA-Stradario-UfficialeA-GGIORNATO-01.10.2020.pdf, https://www.comuneancona.it/cartografia/VIARIO.xls, https://sit.comune.ancona.it/port... commented 2026-02-24 08:10:59 UTC by totera ♦328 |
| 178056723 (Comments: 3) | GfCiS (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you. As this is a trunk road, iD implies "unknown" accessibility for foot/bike/horse. It is nice to tag bicycle=yes. Besides there is an alternative motorroad=no to indicate this trunk road is viable for all traffic. commented 2026-02-24 08:09:17 UTC by YPGGUUY ♦34 |
| 178971370 (Comments: 1) | ZHAOQIHANG (Discussed changesets: 1) | 不要重复添加相同的元素。 commented 2026-02-24 08:01:37 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦38 |
| 167316995 (Comments: 4) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 72) | Ale https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278052750/history chyba nie jest poprawione? commented 2026-02-24 08:01:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 178948520 (Comments: 9) | cascer1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hier een voorbeeld van micromapping, waar iemand de moeite heeft genomen ook nog alle vakken in te tekenen.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.882394/4.490506 commented 2026-02-24 07:53:49 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178787433 (Comments: 2) | sanjanasharma_lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Wolfy1339, My name is Sanjana, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for your careful review and for correcting the issues resulting from my recent edit. I sincerely appreciate your attention to detail. You are absol... commented 2026-02-24 07:50:38 UTC by sanjanasharma_lyft ♦8 |
| 176869452 (Comments: 1) | Sarrebourg Urbanisme (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, Pour les commentaires, pourriez vous décrire ce que vous avez fait https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications L'argument d'autorité (conseil municipal) n'en ... commented 2026-02-24 07:45:28 UTC by Vinber ♦822 |
| 178962717 (Comments: 3) | Debanhi_F (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @ajmat commented 2026-02-24 07:37:52 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178966793 (Comments: 3) | EZOFIS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks @ajmat I have also reverted the other changeset of this user. commented 2026-02-24 07:37:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178966809 (Comments: 2) | EZOFIS (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178974445 where the comment is: "Remove spam" commented 2026-02-24 07:36:09 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 55045311 (Comments: 1) | Yktan Eszett (Discussed changesets: 7) | revert s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5171144 commented 2026-02-24 07:36:08 UTC by Luzandro ♦984 |
| 178964187 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 142) | Unfortunately you are right. I was hoping that it was some caching issue. commented 2026-02-24 07:34:15 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦815 |
| 178888233 (Comments: 1) | Conch Luxury Private Pool Suites (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178973576 commented 2026-02-24 07:22:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178913630 (Comments: 1) | Isabella Carrillo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178973082 commented 2026-02-24 06:54:43 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 176800000 (Comments: 1) | Mike409 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, das Hotel ist seit 16 Jahren erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40808806/history/1 Würdest Du das Duplikat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13429413243 bitte wieder entfernen? commented 2026-02-24 06:52:54 UTC by pyram ♦516 |
| 178965315 (Comments: 2) | nogz7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178965446 commented 2026-02-24 06:39:28 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178969859 (Comments: 2) | nogz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I also noticed this account: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nogz7 Could you please clarify whether multiple accounts are being used here? Also, could you please respond to the comments on the referenced changeset? ... commented 2026-02-24 06:37:57 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178965446 (Comments: 1) | nogz7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I also noticed this account: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nogz Could you please clarify whether multiple accounts are being used here? Also, could you please respond to the comments on the referenced changeset? <... commented 2026-02-24 06:37:01 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178948483 (Comments: 2) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 184) | Ich habe mir erlaubt, es wieder einzutragen.(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178971940) commented 2026-02-24 06:12:14 UTC by rene78 ♦470 |
| 178916149 (Comments: 1) | Jobczynski (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id:178971729 commented 2026-02-24 06:02:42 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178551412 (Comments: 2) | Wanderer_und_Radfahrer_Anton (Discussed changesets: 38) | Keine Antwort. Änderung vorgenommen. commented 2026-02-24 05:41:32 UTC by MichS ♦164 |
| 178608383 (Comments: 2) | Markolsen619 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178633132 commented 2026-02-24 05:34:57 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178593905 (Comments: 2) | CSR_Solucoes (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178610585 commented 2026-02-24 05:34:56 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178604859 (Comments: 2) | Skupujemyautanet (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178660647 commented 2026-02-24 05:34:56 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178589259 (Comments: 2) | BRAUTLIEBE (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178648740 commented 2026-02-24 05:34:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178590011 (Comments: 2) | m0eho (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178617435 commented 2026-02-24 05:34:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178579150 (Comments: 2) | damian214222 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178729633 commented 2026-02-24 05:34:53 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178570362 (Comments: 2) | Andrew Ho (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178579787 commented 2026-02-24 05:34:53 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178569376 (Comments: 2) | کلینیک زیبایی دکتر سعید قزلباش (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178569474 commented 2026-02-24 05:34:52 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178901161 (Comments: 1) | Steve_p78 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178970743 commented 2026-02-24 05:17:53 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178603719 (Comments: 2) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 43) | Nothing reliable came up in searching for "CTLM". Do those other maps show who the operator is? I assume CTLM is the name of a building or business? commented 2026-02-24 04:47:34 UTC by Hypsometric ♦56 |
| 178970194 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo17172 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Elimine la ruta proyectada debido a que este sector ya se ha urbanizado y además junto a Vicente Zorrilla se proyecta construir un parque en el futuro commented 2026-02-24 04:46:01 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦12 |
| 178938615 (Comments: 2) | Asad Jefferson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19838 commented 2026-02-24 04:42:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,822 |
| 178895653 (Comments: 1) | foxxfun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178970090 commented 2026-02-24 04:34:40 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178952027 (Comments: 2) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 43) | You commented there already. In case anyone else has input on these tags that the wiki says not to use on golf=*, the link to a forum post is below with further explanation. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/golf-features-tagged-incorrectl... commented 2026-02-24 04:21:02 UTC by Hypsometric ♦56 |
| 178969676 (Comments: 1) | The Institute for Comprehensive Spine Care (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 04:15:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178969655 (Comments: 1) | Joshua Provost (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 04:15:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178229093 (Comments: 2) | あじさか_import (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your comment. These edits were conducted in accordance with the MLIT PLATEAU manual import procedure (JA:MLIT_PLATEAU/imports_outline/manual). I will also make sure to take the general Import Guidelines into account in future work... commented 2026-02-24 04:12:34 UTC by あじさか_import ♦4 |
| 178893712 (Comments: 1) | Miterev Dmitry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178969445 commented 2026-02-24 04:00:28 UTC by ajmat ♦16 |
| 171527480 (Comments: 1) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | 「int_name」を削除するのはやめてください。 「int_name」は国際表示名として現地に示されているデータです。 「int_name」は英語とは限りません（このことは osm.wiki/JA:Key:name にも書いてあ... commented 2026-02-24 03:52:18 UTC by hayashi ♦17 |
| 178916783 (Comments: 1) | Ahmedsalama968 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178929411 commented 2026-02-24 03:49:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178918657 (Comments: 1) | dw-6677 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178939030 commented 2026-02-24 03:48:32 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178881530 (Comments: 1) | lainyt60 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178928055 commented 2026-02-24 03:47:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178900715 (Comments: 1) | LED112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178927901 commented 2026-02-24 03:46:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178919987 (Comments: 1) | Igorzo (Discussed changesets: 26) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178940460 commented 2026-02-24 03:43:53 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 178915990 (Comments: 1) | Jobczynski (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178941562 commented 2026-02-24 03:42:31 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 178916334 (Comments: 1) | <>{ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178939626 commented 2026-02-24 03:41:42 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 169702017 (Comments: 1) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | 「int_name」を削除するのはやめてください。 「int_name」は国際表示名として現地に示されているデータです。 「int_name」は英語とは限りません（このことは osm.wiki/JA:Key:name にも書いてあ... commented 2026-02-24 03:33:48 UTC by hayashi ♦17 |
| 177571644 (Comments: 1) | ggs290-import (Discussed changesets: 5) | Instead of deleting then adding the buildings back, it is better to just update the existing outline. Doing so will keep the history intact. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/17757... commented 2026-02-24 03:08:40 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 178968572 (Comments: 1) | Belibalon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 03:06:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177580060 (Comments: 1) | Danut Stefan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Se pare că în această editare, precum și în altele, clădirile trebuie să fie pătrate. Pentru a pătra clădirea, selectați conturul, apoi tastați pur și simplu „q”. Încercați să potriviți linia acoperișului ... commented 2026-02-24 03:05:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 178968312 (Comments: 1) | Belibalon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 02:48:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178968173 (Comments: 1) | Belibalon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 02:39:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178968064 (Comments: 1) | Little Yellow Bird (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 02:30:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178968052 (Comments: 1) | Little Yellow Bird (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-24 02:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178966902 (Comments: 1) | M1M4P4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por mejorar el area. Solo hay un error, la pista en óvalo es el circuito para bicis, y el area completa es algo así como un stadium de ciclismo. Ya lo corregí. commented 2026-02-24 02:20:52 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,643 |
| 178967926 (Comments: 1) | Dayana Ontiveros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-24 02:18:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178946889 (Comments: 2) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 43) | There has been a forum post created 3 hours ago for this: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/golf-features-tagged-incorrectly-according-to-the-wiki-and-obscure-tags/141786/1 commented 2026-02-24 02:14:11 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦10 |
| 175516639 (Comments: 1) | DT360boi (Discussed changesets: 2) | No cameras present in this location as of 06Feb2026. I believe they were part of a mobile traffic light for road construction work, as several temporary traffic lights with cameras were observed along US67 between McCamey and San Angelo. commented 2026-02-24 02:05:02 UTC by TX-K ♦2 |
| 176013118 (Comments: 1) | Nosbig (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera is not present. I drove past there today and it's not there. This appears to be an accidental duplicate of the camera a couple hundred yards east. commented 2026-02-24 02:00:31 UTC by Barashnev ♦1 |
| 175469607 (Comments: 1) | DT360boi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Could not locate a camera here or anywhere within 250ft of it. I believe this camera may have been removed, or perhaps incorrectly marked. commented 2026-02-24 01:59:43 UTC by TX-K ♦2 |
| 178946738 (Comments: 1) | Obanazawa Kuri (Discussed changesets: 8) | 距离上次你对学校多边形关系的所有子元素路径添加 education= 值才过去了2个月，为何相同类型的重大编辑错误会反复出现在你的变更内容中？ commented 2026-02-24 01:53:34 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦33 |
| 177484027 (Comments: 3) | Tarafenc (Discussed changesets: 3) | El problema con un uso del suelo tan extenso como este es que probablemente haya zonas comerciales y minoristas, lo que requiere una relación para poder añadirlo con precisión. --- Pu... commented 2026-02-24 01:29:02 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 178949070 (Comments: 1) | FJUT-ST (Discussed changesets: 1) | w/1442293878 与 w/1442293879 是2025年12月完成沥青路面铺装的 地面 道路，且有围挡阻止社会车辆驶入。你是如何认定此段道路为已开放的 下穿隧道 的？ commented 2026-02-24 01:22:23 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦38 |
| 178966949 (Comments: 1) | m86 (Discussed changesets: 34) | It looks like I accidentally dragged a bus stop node and snapped it to a landuse way commented 2026-02-24 01:22:07 UTC by m86 ♦21 |
| 150770528 (Comments: 2) | CENTSOARER (Discussed changesets: 21) | see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines commented 2026-02-24 01:13:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 156947439 (Comments: 2) | Peter Muret (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oh, diese Anmerkung von dir hab ich übersehen. Danke, ja den Link hast du mir glaub ich schon mal zukommen lassen. commented 2026-02-24 01:03:36 UTC by Peter Muret ♦25 |
| 173301159 (Comments: 1) | ポポ77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I know this is a old edit, but instead of deleting the old feature, just adjust the polygon and add/corrects the tags. That saves the history of the object. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2026-02-24 01:02:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,780 |
| 159325492 (Comments: 3) | Peter Muret (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. Meine Quellen waren auch nur die ofiziellen GPX Dateien des Heers. Wie ich sehe hast du es schon geändert, Danke. commented 2026-02-24 00:59:42 UTC by Peter Muret ♦25 |
| 178794970 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to East Legacy Lane --- Published us... commented 2026-02-24 00:57:11 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178962034 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to West Fillmore Street --- Publishe... commented 2026-02-24 00:56:56 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178963279 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to Irving Avenue --- Published using... commented 2026-02-24 00:54:24 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178963404 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to East Las Colinas Boulevard --- Pu... commented 2026-02-24 00:54:08 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178964287 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to The Station Boulevard. building=yes should remain as this is a building. The la... commented 2026-02-24 00:53:40 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178964400 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to Northstar Road --- Published usin... commented 2026-02-24 00:51:57 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178964495 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to Lexington Avenue --- Published us... commented 2026-02-24 00:51:44 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178964579 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to North Harwood Street --- Publishe... commented 2026-02-24 00:51:31 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178965068 (Comments: 1) | Christa M (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please make sure that you are expanding street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations For example, this should be expanded to Midtown Boulevard --- Published u... commented 2026-02-24 00:51:17 UTC by QuiLe ♦47 |
| 178942677 (Comments: 1) | jamesks (Discussed changesets: 119) | Hello James, I have seen that you're editing near my shire, if it is possible please add more accuracy (more nodes) and typology to the tracks to avoid adding it later. Best regards. commented 2026-02-24 00:50:38 UTC by cronoser ♦103 |
| 173026979 (Comments: 1) | Marcelo Chaves (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ao apagar as ciclovias separadas nas avenida Paraná e Santos Dumont, substituindo elas pela etiqueta cycleway;right=track nas linhas principais dessas vias, faltou remover bicycle=use_sidepath das vias principais. Sem isso, OSRM e Valhalla aca... commented 2026-02-24 00:47:29 UTC by ftrebien ♦181 |
| 178965726 (Comments: 1) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 10) | sorry, accidentally pushed some other changes in this changeset; some changes are changes to footways in U of T, and handrails commented 2026-02-24 00:13:37 UTC by hahae ♦23 |
| 178965927 (Comments: 1) | ForestFurnace (Discussed changesets: 37) | https://oldausterlitz.org/what-to-see/ commented 2026-02-24 00:07:44 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦52 |
| 178934129 (Comments: 1) | M_Kucha (Discussed changesets: 85) | Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178965835 commented 2026-02-23 23:50:02 UTC by Bienson ♦407 |
| 178960652 (Comments: 4) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 236) | Son edificios diferentes, que lo más probable es que este unidos mediante esos patios que se ven. La dirección de la Iglesia es Cantournet 705 mientras que el Monasterio según SII Cienfuegos 410-450 aunque parece que hay direccio... commented 2026-02-23 23:45:21 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦12 |
| 178937907 (Comments: 1) | Corinna H (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Corinna H, willkommen in OSM. Ich habe eine Frage zu deiner Änderung: Warum darf ich als Fußgänger nicht am Fahrbandrand einer Landesstraße laufen? Die STVO verbietet es doch nicht, oder? commented 2026-02-23 23:39:52 UTC by george1201 ♦282 |
| 178947144 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 43) | Yes, as the page I linked says, "documentation of tagging on the Wiki is not the final arbiter of 'correct' tagging." commented 2026-02-23 23:38:35 UTC by impiaaa ♦459 |
| 178965528 (Comments: 1) | dlegg73 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2026-02-15 commented 2026-02-23 23:31:02 UTC by dlegg73 ♦12 |
| 178917926 (Comments: 1) | Jalal Kh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please ignore this change I did it by mistake commented 2026-02-23 23:18:35 UTC by Jalal Kh ♦1 |
| 178964981 (Comments: 1) | hbrod535 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-23 23:09:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178964808 (Comments: 1) | Dale Thompson DC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 23:00:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178964146 (Comments: 1) | Shady Rays Pawn Shop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 22:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 176518507 (Comments: 2) | Britzz (Discussed changesets: 59) | it was a physical survey but i used only street complete so maybe i didn't even try to correct the geometry, i don't remember if the roundabout was open to traffic or not commented 2026-02-23 22:23:55 UTC by Britzz ♦253 |
| 178960728 (Comments: 1) | Styvooo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tu mettrais affinement géométrie et type de pylônes THT (ou RTE), ce serait plus clair ;-). commented 2026-02-23 22:14:38 UTC by trial ♦1,097 |
| 143333247 (Comments: 3) | paulbrunner (Discussed changesets: 50) | Salut Habi, merci fürs Aufräumen und das sorgfältige Zusammenführen! :) Gruss zurück aus Züri, Paul commented 2026-02-23 22:07:51 UTC by paulbrunner ♦65 |
| 178963353 (Comments: 1) | bmerino (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 21:57:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178963327 (Comments: 1) | 500384405 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 21:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178963186 (Comments: 1) | 500383620 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 21:51:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178960021 (Comments: 7) | IIVQ (Discussed changesets: 53) | Daar staat toch ook letterlijk dat het perron een area kan zijn? En een area is preciezer dan een way om een gebied aan te geven. We hebben hierover ook een lang topic op het forum, en daar zijn vrijwel alle mappers het met je oneens als je de... commented 2026-02-23 21:45:01 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,093 |
| 171127825 (Comments: 1) | SuperStreetAEDs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mit dieser Änderung wurde der AED node/13103445090 in die Kreisstraßen-Master relation/2054262 und in die K17 relation/89084 aufgenommen. Warum? Vorsorglich wieder entfernt. commented 2026-02-23 21:43:42 UTC by Hb- ♦339 |
 | 178932018 (Comments: 1) | momi999 (Discussed changesets: 2) | שלום סימון שבילים הוא באמצעות יחס ולא עם נקודות אטרקציה ולכן הנקודות נמחקו. אם יש סימון בשטח אז ניתן לסמן את השביל במפה. תודה commented 2026-02-23 21:29:51 UTC by hatul ♦439 |
| 72308991 (Comments: 1) | IVan_f1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте, подскажите, а что это за "Полевая улица"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704886822 Не смог найти её, по моим данным это продолжение Сад... commented 2026-02-23 21:23:22 UTC by Grass-snake ♦266 |
| 178956918 (Comments: 1) | Seaz01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por la adición. Esto está terminado o en construcción? saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178956918 commented 2026-02-23 21:23:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 178819956 (Comments: 1) | dkywxkidxjirs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Deze kringloopwinkel stond al in Openstreetmap, als toekomstige winkel i.p.v. bestaande winkel. Ik heb de dubbeling verwijderd. commented 2026-02-23 21:13:38 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,093 |
| 178952721 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The operator tag should reflect the official full name as displayed. Please avoid shortening personal names. commented 2026-02-23 20:53:14 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178953264 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:51:09 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178953243 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:50:24 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178953214 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:49:42 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178953185 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:49:07 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178953155 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The operator tag should reflect the official full name as displayed. Please avoid shortening personal names. commented 2026-02-23 20:48:19 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 159688957 (Comments: 1) | XioNoX (Discussed changesets: 26) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10905020876, complète tes sites web ;-) https://vyv-enfance.fr/creches/creche-les-ptits-loups-de-mer commented 2026-02-23 20:47:18 UTC by trial ♦1,097 |
| 178651824 (Comments: 2) | AngelB (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks commented 2026-02-23 20:42:59 UTC by AngelB ♦2 |
| 178960732 (Comments: 1) | ASK-Solutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-23 20:35:26 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178958758 (Comments: 1) | dkywxkidxjirs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tip... Probeer bij te taggen op de adresnodes zelf. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-23 20:34:37 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178953044 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:34:09 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178958148 (Comments: 1) | SP26 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag SP Tip Probeer de paden los te houden van de landuse. Ik he e.e.a. losgemaakt. Geef concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-23 20:33:45 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178959008 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:31:20 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178959196 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:28:54 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178959349 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:27:13 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178952909 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:26:31 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 170966612 (Comments: 1) | Minion04 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hallo! Kleine Anmerkung: wirklich die Gebäudetypen vor Ort gecheckt? Das hier stimmte jedenfalls nicht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359971934. Ist nur ein Dach vor der Haustür, keine Garage (die ist rechts daneben!). Ich ändere ... commented 2026-02-23 20:26:27 UTC by goodidea ♦117 |
| 178959371 (Comments: 1) | Simon Salmon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Je info heb ik samengeviegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-23 20:25:53 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178952860 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:25:28 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178960366 (Comments: 1) | AM Clark (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 20:24:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178952820 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:24:44 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178958104 (Comments: 1) | Rybuurt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-23 20:23:34 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178959085 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:23:30 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178952767 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:22:15 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178960356 (Comments: 1) | tomas_picha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 20:21:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178952663 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:19:50 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178960249 (Comments: 1) | 18849420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 20:18:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178952517 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:17:50 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178952446 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:16:38 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178952305 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The height tag should only be applied to actual building areas. Using height on standalone nodes outside buildings is invalid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:11:13 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178953431 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 20:10:25 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178959668 (Comments: 1) | Collector's Palace Coin & Jewelry LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 20:03:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178959626 (Comments: 1) | 500382861 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 20:00:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178959593 (Comments: 1) | Renesans Mental (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 20:00:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178953735 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | The operator tag should reflect the official full name as displayed. Please avoid shortening personal names. commented 2026-02-23 19:58:22 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178769666 (Comments: 2) | Telesreal (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for the heads-up. I'm still learning the best practices for OSM and I apologize for the oversight. I will study the guidelines you provided before attempting new imports. I want to make sure my contributions aling with the com... commented 2026-02-23 19:58:00 UTC by Telesreal ♦1 |
| 178959489 (Comments: 1) | 500365347 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 19:57:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178959364 (Comments: 1) | Mahli Marketing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 19:51:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177807711 (Comments: 2) | kaasbroodje (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, yes the documents are publicly available on the STA website under Ferrovie/Normativa di esercizio. I should've added the source right away, sorry. https://www.sta.bz.it/smartedit/documents/download/260118_fl45_clean.pdf commented 2026-02-23 19:50:26 UTC by kaasbroodje ♦3 |
| 178640781 (Comments: 4) | ReyDerayos24 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ok, gracias por la información. Un saludo. commented 2026-02-23 19:43:08 UTC by ReyDerayos24 ♦4 |
| 178890592 (Comments: 1) | Olgerts V (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Just wanted to let you know, while I think this change (secondary -> primary) is probably correct, please be careful when relying on official documents for such changes, especially city/municipality ones. They have their own classificat... commented 2026-02-23 19:41:55 UTC by HellMap ♦837 |
| 178954847 (Comments: 2) | Kapikapi1975 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ten przy wejściu do świetlicy też jest nie w tej lokalizacji co trzeba na mapie commented 2026-02-23 19:39:57 UTC by bartgron ♦541 |
| 166425425 (Comments: 1) | fourT2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao fourT2 Ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12846780737 eine Kapelle? Aufgrund der swisstopo Luftbilder ist das leider nicht ganz klar. Aber nur `name=Kapelle` ist leider auch ziemlich falsch :) Gruss aus Bern, Habi PS: I... commented 2026-02-23 19:34:03 UTC by habi ♦2,038 |
| 178948944 (Comments: 1) | Schottjer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Schottjer, in OSM empfiehlt es sich, abgerisse Gebäude mit dem Präfix demolished: zu taggen (hier dann demolished:building=yes). Andernfalls kann es passieren, dass ein anderer Mapper auf Basis nicht tagesaktueller Luftb... commented 2026-02-23 19:32:25 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦65 |
| X | 178926422 (Comments: 1) | jsgblom (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi there, was this meant to be upoaded to OSM? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178926422 commented 2026-02-23 19:31:07 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,898 |
| 178939518 (Comments: 1) | ArtemSkachko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день Какого рода заведение вы хотели добавить? commented 2026-02-23 19:24:08 UTC by empty_child ♦385 |
| 178938397 (Comments: 3) | Asad Jefferson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks @qstep commented 2026-02-23 19:21:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178679554 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 19:16:00 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178952995 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 19:12:34 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178513889 (Comments: 4) | Marc1152 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Verstehe. Ja, das komische Verhalten von CoMaps an der Stelle ist mir auch aufgefallen. Mit ging es lediglich um die willkommene Gelegenheit, ein Kleinwenig zu üben und die Auswirkungen auf CoMaps etwas kennenzulernen. commented 2026-02-23 19:10:49 UTC by Marc1152 ♦1 |
| 178673092 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 19:10:44 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178740014 (Comments: 3) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks, Oscar. Much appreciated. commented 2026-02-23 19:01:08 UTC by atticquilt ♦11 |
| 170500046 (Comments: 1) | Brigadeleiter (Discussed changesets: 5) | "Disused" meint eher: langfristig ungenutzt. Die deutsche Übersetzung ist unpassend. Solange der untere Abschnitt nicht befahren werden kann (auch wegen der Brücke Coschützer Straße), ist "disused" die bessere... commented 2026-02-23 19:01:03 UTC by granitschädel ♦23 |
| 178724802 (Comments: 2) | WhichOnesPink (Discussed changesets: 2) | Construction is at least partially complete, as residents have begun requesting waste collection services from my employer. commented 2026-02-23 18:57:34 UTC by WhichOnesPink ♦1 |
| 178589525 (Comments: 8) | Lyon-St-Clair (Discussed changesets: 95) | Sur https://data.explore.star.fr/explore/dataset/mkt-information-documents-td/files/3fb72585a433b2494fc7feeba0bfdce9/download/ on a DEUX parcours possibles : - un Nouvoitou<=>Rennes; - un Corps-Nuds<=>Rennes. C'est le second... commented 2026-02-23 18:56:03 UTC by mga_geo ♦291 |
| 178948379 (Comments: 1) | Yesofcourse (Discussed changesets: 2) | Üdv! Több hiba is van a szerkesztésedben: - Erre a relációra ráraktál egy "Játszótér" nevet, valószínűleg véletlen: https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-02-23 18:37:54 UTC by qstep ♦45 |
| 178933423 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Mohrenhausen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine kleine Anmerkung: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken ... commented 2026-02-23 18:32:23 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,366 |
| 178950474 (Comments: 1) | Oxy Pizza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en. Javítottam a hibákat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178956397 commented 2026-02-23 18:27:06 UTC by qstep ♦45 |
| 178511821 (Comments: 1) | Python5393 (Discussed changesets: 2) | błędna nazwa - poprawiłem commented 2026-02-23 18:24:05 UTC by Bartek444 ♦41 |
| 178942237 (Comments: 1) | DorianDražićKaralić (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverting the entire changeset as the surface tags were deleted on accident #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178956254 commented 2026-02-23 18:21:42 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦23 |
| 178955275 (Comments: 1) | The Cleaning Authority Colorado Springs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 18:00:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178881545 (Comments: 3) | geraunz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Das wird nicht daran liegen. Bis vor 2 Monaten war hier nur highway=construction gemapped, ohne access. brouter ist leider keine gute App, wenn es um die Auswertung von osm-Daten geht. commented 2026-02-23 17:59:08 UTC by limes11 ♦1,010 |
| 178929192 (Comments: 1) | herr_taschenbier (Discussed changesets: 8) | Gleichzeitig shop=bakery und disused:shop=yes? commented 2026-02-23 17:48:11 UTC by Bienson ♦407 |
| 178948701 (Comments: 1) | Robotnikmajowy (Discussed changesets: 123) | W jakim celu został wykonany duplikat adresu Klifowa 1A na wjeździe do parkingu podziemnego? commented 2026-02-23 17:47:43 UTC by Szymson ♦475 |
| 176235936 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 161) | I'm suggesting to you to add it as alt_name, not that alt_name already existed. To my knowledge, no one actually has an address of Heartland Expwy; it's always something like Highway 385. The name Heartland Expwy is more of a generic name, ... commented 2026-02-23 17:47:17 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦99 |
| 142149445 (Comments: 2) | adlid (Discussed changesets: 6) | I don’t recall sorry, feel free to change to be more appropriate commented 2026-02-23 17:43:38 UTC by adlid ♦30 |
| 178954284 (Comments: 1) | LSR365 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 17:36:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178832303 (Comments: 3) | FahRadler (Discussed changesets: 76) | Hi FahRadler, your changes are being discussed in the thread https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nouveaux-imports-reseau-hydrographique-du-canada-canvec-et-source-possiblement-ia/141778 Could you tell us what is the source of the data you ha... commented 2026-02-23 17:32:10 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦364 |
| 178953132 (Comments: 1) | 500361082 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 17:12:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178953192 (Comments: 1) | syam-osm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-23 17:12:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178427475 (Comments: 1) | rwa4132 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing! I noticed you doing something that is not good practice: Please don't use the tags as the name, for example naming a grassland "grass". More info on the wiki: https://wiki.opens... commented 2026-02-23 17:12:30 UTC by neuhausr ♦341 |
| 175802353 (Comments: 2) | vrg (Discussed changesets: 24) | plus obszary landuse nakładają się na siebie commented 2026-02-23 17:07:24 UTC by olo81 ♦709 |
| 176760865 (Comments: 3) | letihu (Discussed changesets: 91) | "country" bedeuted auf deutsch "Land". Bei Adressen in Deutschland müsste das addr:country=DE sein. Oder hat das abtrünnige Ostlutter sich für unabhängig erklärt? ;) Ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher, o... commented 2026-02-23 17:06:44 UTC by os-emmer ♦351 |
| 178952849 (Comments: 1) | GrowPlugins (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 17:03:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178771898 (Comments: 1) | vrg (Discussed changesets: 24) | Budowa osiedla jeszcze nie ruszyła! commented 2026-02-23 17:03:20 UTC by olo81 ♦709 |
| 178882074 (Comments: 1) | spiesr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thanks for adding the public wildlife areas! We've typically been spelling them out instead of using abbreviations (e.g. "Game Production Area" instead of GPA), but otherwise good work! commented 2026-02-23 17:01:02 UTC by SD Mapman ♦63 |
| 178952667 (Comments: 1) | GuKe43 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Korrekter Standort des Geldautomaten commented 2026-02-23 17:00:51 UTC by GuKe43 ♦2 |
| 178952355 (Comments: 1) | GuKe43 (Discussed changesets: 2) | An Stelle von Spar ist jetzt Müller commented 2026-02-23 16:59:59 UTC by GuKe43 ♦2 |
| 178952587 (Comments: 1) | 500380255 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 16:57:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178952188 (Comments: 1) | literally ash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-23 16:48:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178948508 (Comments: 1) | Thom_La (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tot de rotonde Strandweg heb ik access=no verwijderd. Het traject iets aangepast mbv de BGT en laatste luchtfoto. Gr eggie commented 2026-02-23 16:25:13 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178945420 (Comments: 2) | 87141319 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178950192 where the comment is: "🔄 Revert of unintended geometry change" commented 2026-02-23 15:57:43 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 176430944 (Comments: 6) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 288) | Zgodnie z waszymi sugestiami przywróciłem na tym fragmencie secondary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178949359 commented 2026-02-23 15:40:36 UTC by Szymson ♦475 |
| 178940827 (Comments: 2) | Wundermittel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, danke für die bereits erfolgte Änderung. Es war aber die Beschreibung (description) und nicht der Name Eures Shops gemeint. Viele Grüße Pascal commented 2026-02-23 15:39:57 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178933185 (Comments: 1) | jamesks (Discussed changesets: 119) | Hola, los name acabados en "... - btt" son quizás "mtb:name"? por ejemplo: "Cerro De La Cueva - btt"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482146782/history commented 2026-02-23 15:38:41 UTC by aTarom ♦905 |
| 170997950 (Comments: 5) | titivi (Discussed changesets: 4) | C'est bien ce que dit aussi le CS que j'ai cité ;-). commented 2026-02-23 15:37:36 UTC by trial ♦1,097 |
| 178947447 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 15:37:12 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178947387 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 15:37:02 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178947262 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 15:36:49 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178944067 (Comments: 8) | Thom_La (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke.. dan kan access=no eraf. Het zal ander niet routeren. Ik weet niet tot hoever dat al gepend is? commented 2026-02-23 15:36:08 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178822043 (Comments: 1) | DorianDražićKaralić (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tags that were accidentally added to the node have since been deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178948578 @OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-23 15:30:04 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦23 |
| 178944435 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 62) | Fixed truck route based on street signs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178948734 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-02-23 15:26:39 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦56 |
| 178947626 (Comments: 1) | MovingRock76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hiya, thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I’ve undone these changes as the ford was already correctly mapped here: it’s a public right of way, so needs to be mapped. The impassability of it was already tagged with variou... commented 2026-02-23 15:14:41 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,003 |
| 177086705 (Comments: 3) | NaufalFarras (Discussed changesets: 6) | For clarification: I edited that segment by selecting multiple ways and adding tag values (notably ref=* and highway*) at once. By doing so, I accidentally copied oneway=yes to that two way road. There was no PBF or whatever it's called. That�... commented 2026-02-23 14:56:37 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦8 |
| 178943321 (Comments: 1) | amosharper (Discussed changesets: 16) | Whoops, looks like this touched one of the members of the Hastings/St Leonards residential area multipolygon - sorry for large bounding box. commented 2026-02-23 14:49:02 UTC by amosharper ♦42 |
| 178944886 (Comments: 1) | EgUPR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-23 14:48:25 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178923726 (Comments: 1) | Sarmiento78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. No hay un cartel que dice "Callejón" justo afuera? recuerdo que alguien mencionó esto una vez en el chat. Eso primaría sobre el plan regulador. Saludos --- Published u... commented 2026-02-23 14:31:40 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 178889002 (Comments: 8) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 103) | a dál ještě ... ? commented 2026-02-23 14:27:43 UTC by HaPe-CZ ♦105 |
| 178940561 (Comments: 1) | jvpump (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравейте! Хубаво е, че сте добавили сградите. Моля да упоменете все пак като източник АГКК -явно данните са внесени оттам. И по принцип ... commented 2026-02-23 14:25:29 UTC by Fraxi ♦274 |
| 178946138 (Comments: 1) | 500359874 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 14:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178945903 (Comments: 1) | 500381716 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 14:18:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178945707 (Comments: 1) | 500384166 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 14:12:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178945536 (Comments: 1) | Kurt Caroselli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 14:09:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178945500 (Comments: 1) | georgefit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 14:06:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178891333 (Comments: 2) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Danke! commented 2026-02-23 13:50:16 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦16 |
| 178890625 (Comments: 2) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ja, die Wege sind für zweispurige KFZ breit genug. Größtenteils erlauben diese sogar Gegenverkehr. Deine anderen Kommentare in dieser Mail schaue ich mir in den kommenden Woche an. VG commented 2026-02-23 13:46:52 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦16 |
| 178899476 (Comments: 2) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 85) | Thanks for sharing the photo and the on-the-ground confirmation. I’ve reverted the changeset. The signage appears to be a recent addition, as I didn’t observe it during my survey (also typically while running) or in available street-level... commented 2026-02-23 13:46:15 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦138 |
| 178939130 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 13:34:02 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 168112333 (Comments: 1) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hi, die Änderungen kann ich beide nicht ganz nachvollziehen. - Galluswarte: ein Bahnhof bietet ja mehr als nur Abstellfläche für Züge (falls du das mit "Zuglagerung" meinst). Bspw. können Züge dort w... commented 2026-02-23 13:31:47 UTC by Jonaes ♦14 |
| 87513677 (Comments: 1) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 41) | In dem Änderungssatz hattest du mal foot no, bicycle no für die Straße eingetragen. Die sind doch auf der Straße garnicht verboten. Hab die tags jetzt wieder entfernt. commented 2026-02-23 13:21:46 UTC by flex16 ♦57 |
| 178942679 (Comments: 1) | Thomas_61 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thomas, Lijkt me oke. https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=83764.35&geometry.y=412855.96&zoomlevel=9.73 MVG eggie commented 2026-02-23 13:18:43 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178943014 (Comments: 1) | Sedir Life Şark Odası Sedir İmalatı (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 13:15:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178942963 (Comments: 1) | petalsweetcleaning (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 13:15:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178549752 (Comments: 5) | n0b1l (Discussed changesets: 3) | Das Rendering stellt auch nichts anderes dar als das was der Passant sieht: Ein fertiges Gleis auf dem sich Züge bewegen. commented 2026-02-23 13:11:06 UTC by GarryX3D ♦22 |
| 178942762 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 236) | Nota resuelta #5177620 commented 2026-02-23 13:05:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,816 |
| 178932044 (Comments: 1) | momi999 (Discussed changesets: 2) | שלום! המפה הציבורית לא מיועדת לנקודות אישיות. נא להימנע מזה commented 2026-02-23 13:05:42 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦715 |
| 178910374 (Comments: 1) | tachyooon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178942409 commented 2026-02-23 12:58:53 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 178942025 (Comments: 1) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 85) | Due to time constraints this work is likely not perfect and is only an incremental improvement. I removed some personal bookmarks. I removed some descriptive names, transferring them to either descriptions or more specific tags. ... commented 2026-02-23 12:57:51 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦715 |
| 178942037 (Comments: 2) | lilybereikbaar (Discussed changesets: 1) | name=steiger thuis heb ik verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-23 12:57:18 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178942409 (Comments: 1) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178942409 commented 2026-02-23 12:56:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 167103051 (Comments: 2) | Jay May (Discussed changesets: 166) | Hello... It's been a couple of months, so it will be hard to remember now. I recall having searched for something in the Internet. I don't know what you call "automatic transliterations" commented 2026-02-23 12:47:19 UTC by Jay May ♦156 |
| 178915819 (Comments: 1) | Aischtal-One (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bitte beachten Sie die OSM-Regeln: osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-02-23 12:32:30 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 178911946 (Comments: 2) | Bienson (Discussed changesets: 32) | Bitte beachten Sie die OSM-Regeln: osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-02-23 12:31:55 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 178911588 (Comments: 2) | Impecco (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bitte beachten Sie die OSM-Regeln: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-02-23 12:31:25 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 178913504 (Comments: 5) | Zajcek100 (Discussed changesets: 4) | @Mateusz Konieczny - dokładnie to miałem na myśli :) commented 2026-02-23 12:29:59 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦814 |
| 178563159 (Comments: 3) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 191) | I could not verify the acceptance of Bitcoin from their website. commented 2026-02-23 12:03:06 UTC by Comino ♦313 |
| 161062632 (Comments: 3) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 182) | Ogarnięte - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178940305 Dzięki raz jeszcze :) commented 2026-02-23 12:01:02 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,011 |
| 148363797 (Comments: 1) | Toygar Alak (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, viaduct is a bridge composed of several small spans for crossing a valley or a gorge. This is not a viaduct, so can you fix the bridge tag on 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsü commented 2026-02-23 12:00:56 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦234 |
| 178921744 (Comments: 1) | Catguy2025 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id:178940179 commented 2026-02-23 11:58:14 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 175443166 (Comments: 2) | Guntram_Navis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für den Hinweis. Habe es gändert. commented 2026-02-23 11:56:50 UTC by Guntram_Navis ♦1 |
| 1681874 (Comments: 1) | Andy Street (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, you added diameter=12 in on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14823541 and diameter=10 in on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14823541 but those share a segment at the sud of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3408726708 can y... commented 2026-02-23 11:54:36 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,483 |
| 178770183 (Comments: 1) | haabee (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. This is an area with a few quarries. You changed the tag from 'service' highway into 'tertiary' highway. I disagree with that. It is not a through-going highway connecting villages etc. I ... commented 2026-02-23 11:53:50 UTC by Frans S ♦10,454 |
| 178870818 (Comments: 1) | HarmanSajjan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for adding this information to OpenStreetMap. Please please feel free to add more for the surrounding places! Many of us are working with satellite data and do not know about the local information, so this is very very valuable. I p... commented 2026-02-23 11:44:16 UTC by Seyruun ♦12 |
| 178920577 (Comments: 1) | Yadiel Francisco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178939428 commented 2026-02-23 11:43:58 UTC by ajmat ♦16 |
| 178921723 (Comments: 1) | Catguy2025 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id: 178939368 commented 2026-02-23 11:43:14 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 178898413 (Comments: 1) | Amor_fu2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178939361 commented 2026-02-23 11:41:15 UTC by 007Transformer ♦24 |
| 178938359 (Comments: 1) | Voorstad_EM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi.. Beetje muggezifterij. Website altijd met http beginnen. https://hackerspacenijmegen.nl/Hackerspace_Nijmegen Format openingstijden gaf een foutmelding. Ik heb het aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-23 11:40:54 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178938345 (Comments: 1) | luukhermans4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback .. Lijkt me oke als dit de naam van het gebouw is. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-02-23 11:36:58 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178928644 (Comments: 1) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Nee, dit is zeker geen gras. Ik heb het teruggezet naar shrubbery. commented 2026-02-23 11:36:57 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦53 |
| 130351723 (Comments: 6) | mizoslav (Discussed changesets: 6) | Týmto chcem poďakovať dobrej duši, že chybu odstránil. Plánovanie cykloturistického výletu cez sedlo Butorky je možné na akomkoľvek bicykli. Zároveň chcem vyjadriť poľutovanie nad moj... commented 2026-02-23 11:34:22 UTC by mizoslav ♦1 |
| 178897461 (Comments: 1) | gleyowww (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 178931315 commented 2026-02-23 11:27:27 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 178773226 (Comments: 2) | thomaskees (Discussed changesets: 1) | Na wunderbar. Da erkennt man, wer Profi ist und wer herumdilettiert. Sehr herzlichen Dank! Thomas commented 2026-02-23 11:26:14 UTC by thomaskees ♦1 |
| 178886096 (Comments: 1) | cats_and_stuff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178927455 commented 2026-02-23 11:25:45 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 178897988 (Comments: 1) | DesperadoAV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178926805 commented 2026-02-23 11:24:42 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 178884116 (Comments: 1) | Concacmacluoi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178926266 commented 2026-02-23 11:20:05 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 177238599 (Comments: 3) | pingsler (Discussed changesets: 52) | Nachdem sich keiner die Mühe des kompletten Reverts gemacht, habe ich die Straße auf tertiary hochgestuft. commented 2026-02-23 11:17:27 UTC by opendcc ♦1,560 |
| 178907606 (Comments: 1) | Steve_p78 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178925729 commented 2026-02-23 11:15:35 UTC by whitepanda ♦17 |
| 178936604 (Comments: 5) | Voorstad_EM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Evt kun je wel precies over het gebouw twee units building:part=yes intekenen. De buidling=yes laat je dan intact. building:part rendert niet, maar daar kun je wel info in kwijt zoals hoogte e.d. Maar dus niet de naam en de functie. Dat ho... commented 2026-02-23 11:15:11 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178935177 (Comments: 2) | itineris (Discussed changesets: 73) | Ahogy érzed. Bár épp a kettősség miatt nekem mindkettő official. :) commented 2026-02-23 11:08:19 UTC by itineris ♦403 |
| 178936443 (Comments: 1) | Voorstad_EM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag Voorstad, Verwijderde adres heb ik hersteld.. Graag adresnodes intact laten. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-23 11:03:09 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 177000155 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 67) | Cześć zakaz był prawidłowy, ale poprawiłem tagi w taki sposób aby relatify łapało te drogi. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178937609 commented 2026-02-23 10:58:47 UTC by stasiu512 ♦266 |
| 178916880 (Comments: 1) | fedc (Discussed changesets: 141) | è presente una curva appena entri in galleria dalla rotonda (Via Lazzaro Spallanzani x Via Venti Settembre) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=728454076654728&focus=photo quindi mi sembra impossibile che sia dritta.. commented 2026-02-23 10:52:16 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦168 |
 | 178920654 (Comments: 1) | kev34160 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 178929990 commented 2026-02-23 10:51:25 UTC by ajmat ♦16 |
| 178599993 (Comments: 2) | lankapuhelin (Discussed changesets: 7) | Kiitokset kommentista! Hyvä tietää liikennemerkistä. Aion kysyä merkin aiheellisuudesta kaupungilta ja palaan tähän vastauksen saatuani. Epäilen merkin virallisuutta ja asettamisperusteita. commented 2026-02-23 10:44:35 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦76 |
| 178868307 (Comments: 1) | NoelB (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1481461837/ This line is marked as both power and telecom. commented 2026-02-23 10:41:22 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,028 |
| 178866448 (Comments: 3) | PacoHerreno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Frank, danke für die Antwort. Dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910004885 wurde mit diesem Changeset die Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4337095946 hinzugefügt. Dadurch verläuft der Weg jetzt anders, was ve... commented 2026-02-23 10:38:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178936665 (Comments: 1) | Ben Browne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-23 10:36:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 150747328 (Comments: 2) | znrgl (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo mcgyver, danke für das Kommentar. Da ich nicht vor Ort nachsehen kann, bitte ich dich, die Änderung selbst vorzunehmen. Das ist generell der elegantere Weg – wenn du siehst, dass mein Edit nicht mehr der Realität entspricht... commented 2026-02-23 10:36:22 UTC by znrgl ♦6 |
| 178882858 (Comments: 1) | gonzalito8793 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 178936175 commented 2026-02-23 10:30:19 UTC by ajmat ♦16 |
| 178804137 (Comments: 2) | Vika_Nosovich (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hi, A67-A67! Thank you for your comment and request. We will take note of the information. Best, Vika_Nosovich. commented 2026-02-23 10:29:21 UTC by Vika_Nosovich ♦47 |
| 178881881 (Comments: 1) | SHAHZAIB Sasoli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178927738 commented 2026-02-23 10:28:05 UTC by ajmat ♦16 |
| 178524173 (Comments: 2) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 148) | (Replied on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178522105, let’s keep discussion there) commented 2026-02-23 10:20:21 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,003 |
| 178522105 (Comments: 3) | JonLynch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hiya, thanks for your reply and sorry for the slowness of mine. Firstly, thanks for taking the time to try and improve the map to help people stay out of trouble. It’s good to have more local knowledge in the map :) I think the co... commented 2026-02-23 10:20:16 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,003 |
| 178902007 (Comments: 1) | Steve_p78 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178935642 commented 2026-02-23 10:15:45 UTC by MappingMore ♦71 |
| 177330210 (Comments: 2) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 191) | You're welcome. commented 2026-02-23 10:14:39 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦391 |
| 178086814 (Comments: 3) | Timo Herker (Discussed changesets: 7) | Da gehen Leute, sieht man auf Strava, Spuren sieht man auch auf den Luftbildern. Ich bin da auch mal langgelaufen. Es bildet sich halt keine krasse Spur aus, weil es etwas beliebig ist, wo man auf der Wiese geht. Ich vermute, dass sich die Spur etwas... commented 2026-02-23 10:13:53 UTC by syncronic ♦41 |
| 178523002 (Comments: 3) | iMacThere4iAm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Super, thanks for checking :) commented 2026-02-23 10:09:10 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,003 |
| 178698203 (Comments: 1) | iMacThere4iAm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Nice work! commented 2026-02-23 10:07:22 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,003 |
| 178918077 (Comments: 1) | Carmen McConaghy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178927448 commented 2026-02-23 10:00:57 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178885702 (Comments: 1) | Yuki562 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 178926714 commented 2026-02-23 09:59:47 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178921301 (Comments: 1) | DIEGOJAIMES (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 178926341 commented 2026-02-23 09:58:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178932882 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 09:57:12 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178925925 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 09:57:00 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178915192 (Comments: 1) | Yulianna AP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:178926230 commented 2026-02-23 09:56:21 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178924101 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 09:56:16 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178924879 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 09:56:16 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178921861 (Comments: 1) | umaapa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in changeset id:178925799 commented 2026-02-23 09:55:00 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178902303 (Comments: 1) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 38) | KPMG, если быть точным, не то чтобы ушла, а отозвала бренд. Компания осталась и переименовалась в https://kept.ru/ добавлю их commented 2026-02-23 09:53:58 UTC by literan ♦6,995 |
 | 178913441 (Comments: 1) | لعهمل (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id 178925591 commented 2026-02-23 09:51:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦14 |
| 178898262 (Comments: 1) | Steve_p78 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178934169 commented 2026-02-23 09:49:01 UTC by 007Transformer ♦24 |
| 178821105 (Comments: 4) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 111) | to wszystko jasne dzięki :) commented 2026-02-23 09:43:54 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦92 |
| 178934169 (Comments: 1) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 178898262 commented 2026-02-23 09:43:04 UTC by 007Transformer ♦24 |
| 178933916 (Comments: 1) | Ulii (Discussed changesets: 5) | Навіщо до addr:street додавати назву садівничого товариства? commented 2026-02-23 09:42:33 UTC by mike140 ♦370 |
| 178901196 (Comments: 3) | RaNo99 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Okej. Pytam, bo teren ten jest określany jako Rokowiec. I tak jest w TERYT. Także ostatnio nazwano tak ulicę. commented 2026-02-23 09:41:21 UTC by k2101 ♦18 |
| 178934078 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 420) | Related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5177408 commented 2026-02-23 09:38:03 UTC by habi ♦2,038 |
| 178932991 (Comments: 1) | Thomas-Munichways (Discussed changesets: 6) | Kommentar Missgeschick beim hochladen. Bei der Blumenstraße ist seit kurzem Tempo 30 ohne zeitweise Einschränkungen. (Quelle Mapillary 2025). commented 2026-02-23 09:33:47 UTC by Thomas-Munichways ♦11 |
| 178933454 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 420) | No, closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5176956 commented 2026-02-23 09:21:32 UTC by habi ♦2,038 |
| 164440005 (Comments: 3) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 191) | Sorry, falscher Note. Hier der richtige: https://osm.org/note/5158524 commented 2026-02-23 09:18:34 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦391 |
| 148613866 (Comments: 2) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 191) | Siehe Diskussion in Note: https://osm.org/note/5158576 commented 2026-02-23 09:17:44 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦391 |
| 178423117 (Comments: 3) | Naundorfer (Discussed changesets: 27) | Wenn es dort einen erheblichen Anstieg von Unfällen gibt sollte man ggf. darüber nachdenken, Warnschilder aufzustellen. Wenn man Wege aus den Daten löscht die es eigentlich gibt, dann löscht man damit auch die Möglichkeit, au... commented 2026-02-23 09:16:42 UTC by dieterdreist ♦890 |
| 178908282 (Comments: 1) | Juanmi81 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hola. Sé que es bastante difícil en este caso pero una de las buenas prácticas en OSM es conservar el historial, y bueno has borrado los edificios que ya había que yo puse. De todas formas, se ha perdido un poco de info... commented 2026-02-23 09:10:20 UTC by Pipeton ♦37 |
| 178857597 (Comments: 1) | Fabiano Peddis (Discussed changesets: 10) | Compare nello stradario https://www.comune.olbia.ot.it/it/page/14580 commented 2026-02-23 09:06:18 UTC by aboc ♦20 |
| 178931737 (Comments: 2) | twingall1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks agai... commented 2026-02-23 09:00:46 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,970 |
| 178927800 (Comments: 1) | Yaw That (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Yaw That and welcome to OSM. In this changeset you have not only added new buildings, you have also deleted a lot of old ones. The next time you do that, please make sure this is reflected in your changeset comment (e.g. "added new buildin... commented 2026-02-23 08:59:31 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,552 |
| 178918806 (Comments: 5) | twingall1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the prompt reply This may help: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier commented 2026-02-23 08:56:20 UTC by DaveF ♦1,610 |
| 178903165 (Comments: 2) | Iodoc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aangepast naar alleen rechtdoor commented 2026-02-23 08:55:40 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178903822 (Comments: 4) | S_Bouwmans (Discussed changesets: 8) | Een monument naar memorial aangepast. pomp en zwerfkei ook aangepast. Niet alles rendert. MVG eggie commented 2026-02-23 08:47:15 UTC by eggie ♦43,944 |
| 178930028 (Comments: 1) | The Cleaning Authority Phoenix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 07:48:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 177763695 (Comments: 1) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 43) | Please do not add a duplicate address to a POI if it is already registered in the building. commented 2026-02-23 07:42:10 UTC by Dodko ♦1,305 |
| 178889095 (Comments: 3) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 103) | ano, ten pás tam takový skutečně je, škoda, že stejná všímavost není použita i jinde commented 2026-02-23 07:36:28 UTC by HaPe-CZ ♦105 |
| 58213849 (Comments: 1) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 172) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5562878497 le numéro de téléphone est invalide, n'ayant pas trouvé le numéro correct, je vous laisser le renseigner si souhaité Cordialement, Marc commented 2026-02-23 07:31:50 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,483 |
| 85659572 (Comments: 1) | didimosi (Discussed changesets: 50) | Bei dieser Änderung ist in die Naturraumgrenze way/429093416 die Hausnummer node/7551994621 aufgenommen worden. Wieder entfernt mit changeset/178929524 commented 2026-02-23 07:30:18 UTC by Hb- ♦339 |
| 151283136 (Comments: 1) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 184) | Bei dieser Änderung ist in die Naturraumgrenze way/429093416 der node/11901985215 aufgenommen worden. Wieder entfernt mit changeset/178929524 commented 2026-02-23 07:29:49 UTC by Hb- ♦339 |
| 175462585 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Bei dieser Änderung ist in die Naturraumgrenze way/429093416 der node/3073297645 aufgenommen worden. Wieder entfernt mit changeset/178929524 commented 2026-02-23 07:28:15 UTC by Hb- ♦339 |
| 88464443 (Comments: 1) | hesdrib (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4943623703 si tu en as l'occasion il faut vérifier si c'est toujours ouvert car j'ai l'impression que non. par ailleurs le numéro de téléphone &eacut... commented 2026-02-23 07:23:40 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,483 |
| 178929237 (Comments: 1) | oneclickdigital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 07:21:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 94535957 (Comments: 3) | cquest (Discussed changesets: 66) | Je pensais que la ref=A2J6W1 (comup chez dataNOVA) était liée à la boîte d'envoi (jaune) et le cidex porte bien sa propre ref:cidex=304. Je ne comprends pas. Il faut garder la balise ref intacte ? commented 2026-02-23 07:09:10 UTC by LudovicG ♦135 |
| 178397913 (Comments: 1) | Naundorfer (Discussed changesets: 27) | Der nächste Abschnitt zum Schneider-Weg musste von den Waldeigentümern aufwändig "rückgebaut" werden. Dieser Abschnitt ist ebenfalls stark erodiert. Das ist alles eine negative Folge des ungeregelten Begängnisses... commented 2026-02-23 06:55:05 UTC by Naundorfer ♦7 |
| 178422927 (Comments: 1) | Naundorfer (Discussed changesets: 27) | In der Sächsischen Schweiz gab es 2025 einen erheblichen Anstieg bei Kletter- und Wanderunfällen, teils mit schweren Verletzungen oder einem tödlichen Ausgang. Ursachen waren auch die fehlerhafte Routenplanung per App und damit hö... commented 2026-02-23 06:47:10 UTC by Naundorfer ♦7 |
| 178423224 (Comments: 1) | Naundorfer (Discussed changesets: 27) | In der Sächsischen Schweiz gab es 2025 einen erheblichen Anstieg bei Kletter- und Wanderunfällen, teils mit schweren Verletzungen oder einem tödlichen Ausgang. Ursachen waren auch die fehlerhafte Routenplanung per App und damit hö... commented 2026-02-23 06:43:42 UTC by Naundorfer ♦7 |
| 178854853 (Comments: 5) | doms2a (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the feedback! I fixed the name/description. Well I would say it's more like an outdoor park decoration kind of thing. It's an artificial beach area I think they also put an anker somewhere. I just didn't find any POI type t... commented 2026-02-23 06:37:27 UTC by doms2a ♦2 |
| 178927394 (Comments: 1) | dhanu12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (8 changesets) shows that 308 of your last 344 changes were deletions. This is quite... commented 2026-02-23 06:16:11 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178893381 (Comments: 1) | Milan Tero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Regarding the location and description, I think there's been a mistake here. Is this defibrillator really here? If so, could you describe the location in more detail? If not, I'd be grateful if you could provide the correct location. commented 2026-02-23 06:08:27 UTC by chnuessli ♦124 |
| 178537302 (Comments: 2) | DiegoMIM (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178629603 commented 2026-02-23 05:34:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178567690 (Comments: 2) | Surf’s Up (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178667103 commented 2026-02-23 05:34:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178567306 (Comments: 2) | JPMotorservices (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178926628 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-23 05:34:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178554608 (Comments: 2) | Modernize It LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178926625 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-23 05:34:03 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178559381 (Comments: 2) | Hervé Laborieux Ostéopathe DO (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178926627 (Restore previous tags) commented 2026-02-23 05:34:03 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178552036 (Comments: 2) | Nick Climer (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178575485 commented 2026-02-23 05:34:01 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,107 |
| 178542037 (Comments: 2) | Digi KP (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178926623 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-23 05:34:00 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 178536349 (Comments: 2) | L & K Industries (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178926621 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-02-23 05:33:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,153 |
| 5683545 (Comments: 1) | andrewpmk (Discussed changesets: 83) | The pin code is L1V 0G7 commented 2026-02-23 05:24:44 UTC by Promod Mathew ♦1 |
| 178926034 (Comments: 1) | paulmitchellsalondebary (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 05:09:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178484162 (Comments: 4) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 32) | Thank you very much hlfan, for pointing toward the basemap. I truly appreciate it and will keep in mind to refer to it in similar situations. The normalized GPS traces are mostly in alignment with the basemap, except some minor deviation around t... commented 2026-02-23 04:43:43 UTC by Tinetto ♦11 |
| 174871119 (Comments: 2) | Cornell516 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi os-emmer, This was a typo on my part. I meant to specify the actual wikidata value (Q129361). I went ahead and fixed the tag. commented 2026-02-23 03:47:14 UTC by Cornell516 ♦2 |
| 177399516 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Thanks for pointing this out, I forgot to undo this yesterday. Will do it now. commented 2026-02-23 03:43:11 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦27 |
| 178923128 (Comments: 1) | ChehrehBargi (Discussed changesets: 63) | دیدی دستکاری در ویرایش دیگران چقدر میتونه راحت باشه، و ناراحت کننده و وقت گیر من تمایلی به ادامه این کار ندارم، فقط خواستم ببینی بقیه هم ... commented 2026-02-23 03:26:23 UTC by masoudghorbani ♦14 |
| 169401805 (Comments: 4) | fmc_5 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hallo Ihr 2, Meine Bilder waren zwar kurz nach Errichtung des Parkverbotes da (wohne ja nur 3 Minuten entfernt), aber im September gab es auch weitere neue Bilder durch Euch (Louisa) ;) Danke fürs weitere anpassen. LG Stefan commented 2026-02-23 03:16:29 UTC by StefanHRT ♦405 |
| 178923987 (Comments: 1) | Ninan Sajeeth Philip (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-02-23 03:16:13 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178910477 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 03:00:51 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909507 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 03:00:10 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909613 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 03:00:05 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909696 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 03:00:00 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909722 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:56 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909778 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:49 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909822 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:45 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909855 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:40 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909884 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:35 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909946 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:30 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910035 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:25 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910047 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:18 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910130 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:13 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910253 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:07 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910286 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:59:03 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910322 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:59 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910371 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:54 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910411 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:50 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910440 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:45 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910485 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:40 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910524 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:36 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910547 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:31 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910570 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:26 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910638 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:20 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910660 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:14 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910719 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:09 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910734 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:58:04 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910751 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:59 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910773 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:53 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910783 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:47 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910796 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:42 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910888 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:37 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912135 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:32 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912164 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:26 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912175 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:18 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912193 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:14 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912277 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:09 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912297 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:57:04 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912389 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:56:59 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912426 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:56:54 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912488 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:56:49 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912555 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:56:44 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178912592 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:56:36 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909990 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | This revert removed verified speed limit data based on Iranian urban traffic law. The information has been restored. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:52:02 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910868 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Targeted revert removed verified height restriction of the multi-storey parking; restoring it. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:37:54 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178910219 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | Targeted revert removed verified edits of Mashahir Garden; restoring them. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:25:55 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 178909313 (Comments: 1) | masoudghorbani (Discussed changesets: 131) | These branch edits were reverted as they conflicted with verified data. Awaiting DWG review. commented 2026-02-23 02:14:29 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦565 |
| 177985387 (Comments: 3) | DwightTee (Discussed changesets: 4) | I hope this helps, but in general you want to do things like ensure that -- even though they aren't roads -- that the Equestrian trails have a node at intersections with other trails, and that the end of them is at another trail or a parking lot... commented 2026-02-23 01:53:25 UTC by c0nsumer ♦15 |
| 178922021 (Comments: 1) | PowerMapper77 (Discussed changesets: 3) | After looking through some of these it seems like a decent amount of these are duplicates of some form of already mapped features. Can you please look back through this changeset and fix the duplicates. Happy Mapping, Udar. commented 2026-02-23 01:42:03 UTC by Udarian ♦664 |
| 178719807 (Comments: 2) | fade68911 (Discussed changesets: 1) | а, вы его добавили. В любом случае не нужно ради такого двигать границы санотория commented 2026-02-23 01:32:54 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,405 |
| 178922176 (Comments: 1) | umaapa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-02-23 01:06:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,697 |
| 178921543 (Comments: 1) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 80) | charge:coditional do charge* commented 2026-02-23 00:28:47 UTC by stasiu512 ♦266 |
| 178906367 (Comments: 3) | Alpha1976 (Discussed changesets: 13) | If mapper continues to make changes without meaningful comments while there is no reply to your messages for quite some time - there is an option of sending a report to the OSM moderators through his profile, so that they can look at the situation. T... commented 2026-02-23 00:05:55 UTC by Tomas_J ♦333 |
| 104557579 (Comments: 2) | gadacz (Discussed changesets: 48) | the same for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1534620266/history commented 2026-02-22 23:59:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |