| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 170084840 (Comments: 1) | Alucard2006 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. If you use the "add place" function it will be added to a community-built global data base. Please only add places like for example convenience stores and agrarian shops that really exist. For personal bo... commented 2025-10-15 19:45:11 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦162 |
 | 171440326 (Comments: 2) | rarad74 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello. Probably by mistake and not intentionally. I thought that was the administrative area of Sibiu. commented 2025-10-15 19:45:04 UTC by rarad74 ♦302 |
 | 173109773 (Comments: 1) | roozbehetech (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why is this place not showing on the map yet? commented 2025-10-15 19:36:58 UTC by roozbehetech ♦2 |
 | 150695470 (Comments: 1) | alapeyre (Discussed changesets: 3) | J'ai ajusté l'emprise en tenant compte de la réalité d'usage des habitants : la parcelle d'entrée à gauche était initialement exclue, mais à terme tous les habitants font partie du ... commented 2025-10-15 19:33:08 UTC by JLZIMMERMANN ♦120 |
 | 173315231 (Comments: 1) | MrTec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Usunąłeś nazwę Moko-tuff. Było to celowe czy przypadkowe? Jest tam jakaś inna nazwa czy miejsce jest w ogóle bez nazwy? Co do drugiego punktu nie powiela się nazwy w tagu loc_name, jeśli ta nazwa występuje już w tagu name. A godzi... commented 2025-10-15 19:26:32 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
 | 173334164 (Comments: 1) | DiRe12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je hebt algemeen access=permissive (voor iedereen geldend) toegevoegd, maar ook specifiek. Specifiek is beter.. Dus dan kun je van foot=yes beter foot=permissive maken. Verder beter geen paden aan de landuse vastplakken. Aan de zuidzijde heb j... commented 2025-10-15 19:20:51 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173334706 (Comments: 1) | mfkneinnl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Goed om zaken actueel te houden. oneway=no hoef je niet toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen. Dat is default. MV... commented 2025-10-15 19:16:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
 | 170601452 (Comments: 2) | Matus_M (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ďakujem za upozornenie a opravu. nabudúce už použijem spomínanú pomôcku commented 2025-10-15 19:15:43 UTC by Matus_M ♦7 |
 | 173289983 (Comments: 2) | JiahuiY (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thank you for your comment. There are some issues that I need to explain and clarify 1. I did remove the sidewalk on the west side of barnes street not just because it didn't exist in the aerial image. And when I passed by bison dr Every day, I ... commented 2025-10-15 19:06:35 UTC by JiahuiY ♦3 |
 | 173291185 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Und den Haken "Überprüfungsbitte" vielleicht etwas seltener und bei kritischen Fällen setzen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 18:59:37 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173145992 (Comments: 2) | Ekeefoof (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ist er auch, aber mit Zusatzzeichen für Reiter frei. commented 2025-10-15 18:58:41 UTC by Ekeefoof ♦13 |
| 173333218 (Comments: 1) | Jan Allersma (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Jan, review requested.. Lijkt me oke zo. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-15 18:54:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 170432699 (Comments: 2) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hm, asi pomätenie zmyslov. Opravím. commented 2025-10-15 18:50:42 UTC by Tomas_J ♦307 |
 | 137478800 (Comments: 2) | kubriel (Discussed changesets: 2) | I will delete it commented 2025-10-15 18:49:17 UTC by Znaika ♦121 |
 | 173333125 (Comments: 1) | Atul505 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Atul505, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work an... commented 2025-10-15 18:46:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
 | 173333059 (Comments: 1) | Haritron (Discussed changesets: 9) | I meant to say using the source [Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-06-15] --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173333059 commented 2025-10-15 18:32:36 UTC by Haritron ♦9 |
| 173292482 (Comments: 1) | caboulot (Discussed changesets: 6) | J'ai fait des photos Mapillary depuis les bords de Saône pendant l'incendie commented 2025-10-15 18:24:31 UTC by HugoC01 ♦43 |
 | 161394916 (Comments: 2) | Bächli (Discussed changesets: 6) | Wir bin die Strecke mit dem E-Bike gefahren am 28.12.2024 mit der Gopro. Von der Bruggen Feldstrasse herkommend bei minusgrad Nebel und Schneebedeckter Fahrbahn. Ich habe das Video gleich betrachtet und keine Verbotstafeln gesehen. Bin dieses Jahr 3 ... commented 2025-10-15 18:24:23 UTC by Bächli ♦4 |
| 173048292 (Comments: 1) | solcarlus5 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bonjour, Techniquement, le parc est la partie de gauche. Idéalement, il faudrait diviser le landuse en deux, au niveau du mur qui sépare le parc du jardin de la maison. J'aurais bien voulu le faire moi-même mais je ne suis... commented 2025-10-15 18:23:15 UTC by karr4s ♦44 |
| 172972941 (Comments: 2) | Pomorze Zachonie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Niesamowite :) commented 2025-10-15 18:21:15 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦539 |
| 173303729 (Comments: 1) | sapphir (Discussed changesets: 13) | standardowo budynek zachowuje kąty proste. Ten budynek jest większy i ma inny kształt. Poprawiłem. commented 2025-10-15 18:17:05 UTC by Bartek444 ♦19 |
| 173302325 (Comments: 5) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 5) | thank you!! 🫡 commented 2025-10-15 18:16:08 UTC by skfd ♦283 |
| 173262622 (Comments: 1) | sapphir (Discussed changesets: 13) | droga pieszo rowerowa to nie cycleway czy na pewno wrysowana przez Ciebie cycleway kończy się w rowie? Na jakiej podstawie tak wrysowałeś? Abu skorzystać z tej trasy powinna się łączyć z innymi drogami. Czy w terenie nie ma połączeni... commented 2025-10-15 18:12:02 UTC by Bartek444 ♦19 |
 | 173305603 (Comments: 1) | Пичкуров (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте, обращаю внимание: - тип дороги указывается в зависимости от важности, здесь highway=residential или unclassified вполне достаточно: h... commented 2025-10-15 18:06:04 UTC by Grass-snake ♦244 |
 | 173254873 (Comments: 2) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hi, thanks for catching those and for reaching out to ask about them! They are present in the source dataset and not intended to be uploaded to OSM. I've removed those tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173332231 and additionally ch... commented 2025-10-15 18:02:04 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦111 |
| 173327519 (Comments: 2) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, da gibt es einen Renderer der mir den Kreisverkehr teilweise mit zwei Spuren dargestellt hat, obwohl lanes=1 und junction=roundabout gesetzt waren. Ich schaue gerade, was der Fehler sein könnte. Ich lasse das oneway=yes zunächst bestehe... commented 2025-10-15 18:01:32 UTC by vanagaudi ♦27 |
| 137805539 (Comments: 2) | Bächli (Discussed changesets: 6) | Danke für die Diskussion. Das allgemeine Verbotsschild ist weiter weg von der Hauptstrasse Richtung West. Die Verzweigung Richtung Autostrasse, Rettungszufahrt. Auch auf Swisstopo sieht man kein roten Punkt. Dieser zeigt ein allgemeines Fahrverb... commented 2025-10-15 17:58:55 UTC by Bächli ♦4 |
| 173292153 (Comments: 1) | Pomorze Zachonie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zestaw zmian błędny, wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173332191 commented 2025-10-15 17:58:41 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173330319 (Comments: 1) | Pomorze Zachonie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zmiany powinny być podzielone na mniejsze zestawy zmian commented 2025-10-15 17:54:29 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173329089 (Comments: 1) | Pomorze Zachonie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Do drzew nie dodajemy takich opisów commented 2025-10-15 17:54:07 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173327555 (Comments: 2) | Aq2p88u (Discussed changesets: 1) | De camping heb ik verplaatst naar het vlak. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-15 17:52:25 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173097480 (Comments: 1) | asitambuke (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo asitambuke, du scheinst neu bei OSM zu sein. Bauwerke wie Garagen werden üblicherweise mit building=garage getaggt, statt im Namensfeld Garage einzugeben. Durch die Tags wird semantisch klar, was dieses Bauwerk ist und es ka... commented 2025-10-15 17:48:42 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦31 |
| 173331316 (Comments: 1) | Zorororo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary commented 2025-10-15 17:36:58 UTC by Zorororo ♦5 |
 | 171799396 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-15 17:35:10 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦7 |
| 173331098 (Comments: 1) | Damian-R (Discussed changesets: 8) | To nie jest residential... commented 2025-10-15 17:33:47 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173324828 (Comments: 5) | Kulleke (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi.. laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek. Gewoon gaan mappen. Mvg.. eggie commented 2025-10-15 17:29:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173330642 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalisme teruggedraaid https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173331051 commented 2025-10-15 17:26:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 173330613 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalisme teruggedraaid https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173331051 commented 2025-10-15 17:26:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 173330675 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalisme teruggedraaid https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173331051 commented 2025-10-15 17:26:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 173330586 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalisme teruggedraaid https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173331051 commented 2025-10-15 17:26:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
 | 125014279 (Comments: 1) | Linhares (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/14468764. What is the mean of the tags FUNAI:ADR = Goiânia FUNAI:AREAETNO = I FUNAI:AREA_HA = 38000 FUNAI:CDOC = Port Decl FUNAI:CODAREA = 4602 FUNAI:DATADOC = 1996-10-... commented 2025-10-15 17:24:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 171801167 (Comments: 3) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-15 17:23:04 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦7 |
| 173094249 (Comments: 2) | Krzywas (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted these changes for now. Please feel free to import them again with proper tags, and following our Import Guidelines. commented 2025-10-15 17:19:30 UTC by mueschel ♦6,683 |
| X | 173309460 (Comments: 1) | coteyka (Discussed changesets: 19) | I'm so sorry for this changeset, i accidentally edited one natural=wood polygon commented 2025-10-15 17:16:41 UTC by coteyka ♦11 |
| X | 171751210 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-15 17:14:10 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦7 |
| 173291096 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:13:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173291032 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:13:49 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173290979 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:13:30 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173290782 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:13:23 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173290626 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:13:13 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173290581 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:13:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173290513 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:13:00 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173290429 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:12:43 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173290095 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:12:18 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173290049 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:12:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289970 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:12:04 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289907 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:11:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289863 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:11:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289814 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:11:37 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289757 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:11:24 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289688 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:11:01 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289609 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:10:53 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289569 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:10:46 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289515 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:10:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289470 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:10:35 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 171685874 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-15 17:10:33 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦7 |
| 173289432 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:10:29 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
 | 172915075 (Comments: 1) | druidexe1985 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I reverted this changeset: It contains only 1000 nodes without any tag commented 2025-10-15 17:10:27 UTC by mueschel ♦6,683 |
| 173289379 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:10:22 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173218395 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | Please note: I have removed the house number from the tag {{addr:street}} commented 2025-10-15 17:10:13 UTC by the-wouter ♦27 |
| 173289322 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:10:12 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289253 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:10:04 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289177 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:09:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173298323 (Comments: 1) | Undearius (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dJS. What is the mean of the key Upper_Number? If you want to draw a separate node for each address, please read up on addr:interpolation (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Addresses#Buildi... commented 2025-10-15 17:09:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173289126 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:09:49 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289055 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:09:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288961 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:09:36 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
 | 173324846 (Comments: 1) | TBonanno (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao TBonanno Per favore, non inserire i codici postali sulle cime delle montagne, non ha senso ! Ti ho già scritto in precedenza, per favore controlla i commenti sui changeset ! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173233981 |
| 173288898 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:09:30 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288751 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:09:23 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288696 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:09:17 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288619 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:09:08 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288543 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:59 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288499 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288445 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288347 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:39 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288252 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:33 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288171 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:26 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173288111 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:17 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173287995 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173287902 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:08:04 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173287249 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:07:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285939 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:07:48 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285857 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:07:39 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285789 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:07:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285672 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:07:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285617 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:07:05 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285517 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:06:58 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285323 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:06:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285176 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:06:32 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285089 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:06:26 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173285002 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:06:17 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173284832 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:06:09 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173284659 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:05:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173284599 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:05:43 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173284524 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:05:34 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173284430 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:05:17 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173284321 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:05:01 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173284122 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 17:04:48 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173283982 (Comments: 1) | DoNiJuRoMaJa (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung: Das Feld „coupĺings“ bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschl... commented 2025-10-15 17:01:59 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173289926 (Comments: 1) | jcrm07 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, was ist denn der "Bürgerservice" - sicher keine Stadt. VG commented 2025-10-15 16:59:06 UTC by limes11 ♦955 |
| 171373687 (Comments: 1) | yves klein (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo es gibt hier Kritik an deinem Eintrag https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5006891 Existiert diese Plattform hier und ist von außen erkennbar ? Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 16:57:02 UTC by limes11 ♦955 |
| 173315694 (Comments: 1) | Damian-R (Discussed changesets: 8) | O, nowość, kolejny budynek nagle wyburzono? commented 2025-10-15 16:55:02 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173315887 (Comments: 1) | Damian-R (Discussed changesets: 8) | Był dobry budynek to musiałeś go usunąć i dodać swój z geometrią na podstawie linii dachów? Tak nie robimy. commented 2025-10-15 16:54:42 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173247904 (Comments: 2) | laurentbecker1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Re bonjour, Je n'avais pas fait attention en répondant que vous étiez novice. Merci de cette première contribution, et même si elle n'est pas parfaite! Je ne sais pas si vous aviez vu le panneau que je citai... commented 2025-10-15 16:50:54 UTC by mavOsaure ♦40 |
| 173315618 (Comments: 1) | Damian-R (Discussed changesets: 8) | I co w tej dokumentacji wyczytałeś? Że wyburzyli budynek. Bzdury totalne commented 2025-10-15 16:48:45 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173295261 (Comments: 1) | Andrea Del Sarto (Discussed changesets: 61) | Ciao Andrea, posso chiederti come mai hai abbassato la scala da E a T ? commented 2025-10-15 16:47:50 UTC by dp7 ♦54 |
| 173315161 (Comments: 1) | Damian-R (Discussed changesets: 8) | Po kiego grzyba usunąłeś building=yes? commented 2025-10-15 16:44:41 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173316047 (Comments: 1) | Damian-R (Discussed changesets: 8) | Chłopie coś Ty narobił... Nazwa zupełnie bez sensu, gdzie jest tag building=yes? Teraz to się będzie renderować jako obszar... commented 2025-10-15 16:43:38 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
 | 172442677 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-15 16:43:26 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦7 |
| 173315459 (Comments: 1) | Damian-R (Discussed changesets: 8) | Tutaj tag name również jest zbędny commented 2025-10-15 16:41:44 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
 | 172657628 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-15 16:39:57 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦7 |
| 173315324 (Comments: 2) | Damian-R (Discussed changesets: 8) | access=yes również zbędne, to jest wartość domyślna commented 2025-10-15 16:39:51 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 171327558 (Comments: 1) | Кірыла (Discussed changesets: 14) | Можешт испарвить пожалуйста почтовые ящики https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112793494 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13086769477 имеют одинаковый ref:belpost = 1345 commented 2025-10-15 16:35:23 UTC by bigopenmac ♦64 |
| 172975235 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-15 16:34:30 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦7 |
 | 169131584 (Comments: 3) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 53) | I think you're right that "surface" is the key word here, as that's what your feet/wheels interact with and what ultimately determines whether the suitability of the bridge for travel (it's also the only thing that's tri... commented 2025-10-15 16:32:40 UTC by Dan200 ♦6 |
| 169025140 (Comments: 1) | Bru7ax (Discussed changesets: 8) | Можешь разобраться с ящиками этими? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5071909992 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2154081964 у них сейчас отмечен одинаковый ref:belpost=5917 commented 2025-10-15 16:25:15 UTC by bigopenmac ♦64 |
| 173328363 (Comments: 1) | hashhar (Discussed changesets: 3) | Access Granted only school boundry commented 2025-10-15 16:23:11 UTC by Alla SantoshPavanKumar ♦2 |
 | 173326409 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 238) | Un resolved Permission needed From your border commented 2025-10-15 16:19:37 UTC by Alla SantoshPavanKumar ♦2 |
| 173326527 (Comments: 1) | Loodgietersbedrijf Utrecht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. Ik heb craft=plumber toegevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-15 16:12:17 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173325344 (Comments: 1) | Kulleke (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bomen zijn oke. commented 2025-10-15 15:55:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173322876 (Comments: 2) | soewhatman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Things like "Church" and "Residence" commented 2025-10-15 15:54:57 UTC by MassCartog ♦197 |
| 172306184 (Comments: 2) | NxPFoto (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke für den Hinweis! :) commented 2025-10-15 15:51:03 UTC by NxPFoto ♦3 |
| 173325183 (Comments: 1) | Kulleke (Discussed changesets: 3) | Je trekt de grakvalkken over de fietspaden heen. Binnen de bebouwde kom kun je die paden beter vrijlaten. In de bossen ligt dat weer anders. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-15 15:45:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 170452875 (Comments: 2) | VLD277 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Good morning Benoit, Thank you for reaching out regarding my edits on la rue Didot and making the necessary corrections. I am always striving to improve and your feedback is appreciated. Sincerely, Susan (VLD277) commented 2025-10-15 15:37:38 UTC by VLD277 ♦13 |
| X | 173325965 (Comments: 1) | Khangdhrhhd (Discussed changesets: 16) | Block given for vandalism of China control's South China Sea and the whole China relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18846 commented 2025-10-15 15:35:41 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,505 |
| 172386684 (Comments: 1) | FixH (Discussed changesets: 4) | Rechtfertigt der aktuelle Planungsfortschritt wirklich eine Eintragung hier? Es gibt aktuell zu keiner konkreten Trasse einen politischen Beschluss oder eine Bestrebung, sie zur Genehmigung einzureichen, lediglich eine Diskussionsgrundlage. commented 2025-10-15 15:26:42 UTC by SandGetriebe ♦1 |
| 172157535 (Comments: 2) | nkay23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thank you for the warm welcome and for taking the time to review my edits. I'm really sorry, I'm new to OSM editing and wasn’t aware of the copyright restrictions around using sources like the Herts CC webmap. I appreciate you poi... commented 2025-10-15 15:24:22 UTC by nkay23 ♦1 |
 | 172784937 (Comments: 2) | Zouhair Errahby (Discussed changesets: 1) | They re villages (AKA douar). Not a city. I work in this place and those are small villages with over 100-200 people in each village. What i mark is the centre of the village. The village is sparked over the area. Please accept modification so it can... commented 2025-10-15 15:22:33 UTC by Zouhair Errahby ♦1 |
| 173320460 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre alerte, nous avons fait les corrections de notre côté Cordialement, commented 2025-10-15 15:14:06 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦253 |
 | 169116866 (Comments: 4) | Mhei22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olen samaa mieltä. Tässä tapauksessa maanomistajalla olisi mahdollisuus estää kulku koko alueen läpi. Kun hän ystävällisesti on jättänyt meille pyöräilijöille mahdollisuuden kä... commented 2025-10-15 15:12:50 UTC by Okahkonen ♦3 |
| 173286472 (Comments: 3) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 22) | Good to know! Is the method documented anywhere? I'm asking because I've been adding lots of housenumbers just north of here, mainly from out-of-copyright NLS-hosted maps and from lots of direct in-person surveys for postwar buildings and... commented 2025-10-15 15:03:38 UTC by spiregrain ♦210 |
| 172634141 (Comments: 2) | JigAma (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, après avoir reconsulter plusieurs source, je pense que je me suis trompé. Cependant, après vérification sur le site de Wavrin, il n'y a aucun arrêté municipaux interdisant la circulation &agra... commented 2025-10-15 15:01:50 UTC by JigAma ♦8 |
| 173321030 (Comments: 1) | mzioma (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hej. Mam wrażenie, że te zasady dotyczyły tylko węzłow drogowych a w kwestii zwykłych skrzyżowań jest dowolność, dlatego nie mówię że to jest poprawnie bądź niepoprawnie commented 2025-10-15 14:55:36 UTC by voltairovicz ♦218 |
| 173311670 (Comments: 2) | Slimec di Lanzini Simone (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, grazie per la modifica. Ti faccio solo notare che con la modifica che hai fatto hai aggiunto un nome all'edificio, non all'azienda. Ma nessun problema, sistemo io --- Published using OSMCh... commented 2025-10-15 14:40:27 UTC by Mannivu ♦244 |
| 172950205 (Comments: 3) | JOB34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je ne m'y connais pas super bien non plus et je ne sais pas comment trouver l'historique. J'ai l'impression que sans faire exprès, tu as déplacé légèrement tous les points et supprimer la marquis... commented 2025-10-15 14:39:15 UTC by AntoineL29 ♦2 |
 | 172336977 (Comments: 2) | GrabVN_Dang (Discussed changesets: 8) | Tôi thấy khá khó chịu khi những người như bạn không chịu tìm hiểu và kiểm chứng những chỉnh sửa mới của người khác. commented 2025-10-15 14:16:59 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦11 |
 | 173322480 (Comments: 1) | Layft Greater (Discussed changesets: 58) | note 4699672 Marked as unclassified & updated surfaces of roads in the area based on aerial commented 2025-10-15 14:03:22 UTC by Layft Greater ♦176 |
| 173269815 (Comments: 1) | Xiaomi HyperOS 12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста не пишите имена заглавными буквами https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Не_пишите_ВСЕМИ_ЗАГЛАВНЫМИ и не добав... commented 2025-10-15 14:01:54 UTC by s777n ♦304 |
| 164197737 (Comments: 1) | dada24 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi dada24, Please use international phone format in the future without signs - and / ! It's easy to call someone from Android OSM App. I corrected Porto and Riva Best Regards Znaika commented 2025-10-15 14:00:19 UTC by Znaika ♦121 |
| 173321090 (Comments: 1) | DaDapperMapper (Discussed changesets: 16) | Correction: Comment is "Added road just southwest of Kirri Bat #adt" commented 2025-10-15 13:41:38 UTC by DaDapperMapper ♦16 |
 | 173300131 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 190) | me ayudas a ordenar los recorridos de las lineas 10 70 24 39 46 168 29 53 93 74 porque tengo medio desordenados los recorridos a la altura de martin garcia y tambien de la 152 197 33 64 29 53 a la altura de almirante brown commented 2025-10-15 13:32:33 UTC by i2004 ♦161 |
| 173320981 (Comments: 1) | burn2theground (Discussed changesets: 2) | Forgot to mention in change, but this was to add address and business info to pre-existing building. commented 2025-10-15 13:32:10 UTC by burn2theground ♦2 |
| 164679150 (Comments: 2) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 88) | …err osmi problem commented 2025-10-15 13:25:33 UTC by nevw ♦2,049 |
| 173282669 (Comments: 2) | seewäldler (Discussed changesets: 15) | Stimmt, das muss dann auch noch geändert werden, habs grad gemacht. commented 2025-10-15 13:18:32 UTC by seewäldler ♦175 |
| 173265700 (Comments: 2) | oldnab (Discussed changesets: 1) | C'est original : une "boîte à livres chrétiens" Voir ce lien panoramax : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#focus=pic&pic=41c17f38-7ffc-4417-ac0d-fe53d3acc030 Qui marche, alors que le lien https:/... commented 2025-10-15 13:06:28 UTC by oldnab ♦2 |
| 167952693 (Comments: 2) | hofame (Discussed changesets: 2) | A giugno mi sono trovato una transenna in mezzo. Vedi foto: https://photos.app.goo.gl/TEvJm2AuuEcgmmzX8 Stessa cosa salendo da sotto. Non so se c'è ancora. commented 2025-10-15 12:53:18 UTC by hofame ♦1 |
| 173296513 (Comments: 9) | ZLima12 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Ref: DWG Ticket#2025101510000281 commented 2025-10-15 12:43:32 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦573 |
| 173318542 (Comments: 1) | Stomy Jose (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-15 12:39:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
 | 173317670 (Comments: 1) | vellare (Discussed changesets: 6) | Руины здания (1442329062), v1 НЕПОТРІБНО ЦЕ ВКАЗУВАТИ В НАЗВІ!!!!!!! commented 2025-10-15 12:28:36 UTC by kamasytrix ♦43 |
| 173237063 (Comments: 2) | Константин Гам (Discussed changesets: 298) | * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aroad_marking%3Dsolid_stop_line commented 2025-10-15 12:26:45 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,129 |
| 173315073 (Comments: 6) | Brondata Keolis Nederland (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik vind het fijn dat ik überhaupt reactie krijg! ;-) Het zal me niet weerhouden in elk geval. Groet, Martijn commented 2025-10-15 12:23:11 UTC by Brondata Keolis Nederland ♦1 |
| 173007799 (Comments: 5) | Seetroll (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello, sorry for my unfortunate country extensions, and thank you for your help with your changes or reversals. However, I'm wondering why the country selection in the addresses is then available in JOSM? Thank you very much. commented 2025-10-15 12:00:52 UTC by Seetroll ♦26 |
 | 173130752 (Comments: 1) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 8) | 始めまして、坂ノ下と申します。 changesetを見ると大量の削除が行われていますが、これはコメント通り「最終編集が古く、空中写真と大きく乖離する地物を削除」を実施されたで... commented 2025-10-15 11:56:42 UTC by K_Sakanoshita ♦14 |
| 173257863 (Comments: 2) | Arcas88 (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking on the website of that hotel that's what is set as the phone number, some have some rlly weird phone numbers but they seem to work commented 2025-10-15 11:51:03 UTC by Arcas88 ♦2 |
| 173298018 (Comments: 2) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 9) | А, понял, два адреса у дома commented 2025-10-15 11:50:26 UTC by MrYadro ♦37 |
| 173315358 (Comments: 1) | Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (Discussed changesets: 13) | review_requested \tyes Dag Marco Op het hek zou je ook nog accesstags kunnen zetten en/of evt locked=yes of no MVG eggie commented 2025-10-15 11:39:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
 | 172740402 (Comments: 3) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 263) | Podobne je to s plánovanou cyklostezkou v okolí Uherského Ostrohu: „Pokud vede cyklostezka po koruně protipovodňové ochranné hráze nebo po břehu toku, požadujeme, aby byla vybudovaná s dos... commented 2025-10-15 11:37:35 UTC by mapperue ♦231 |
 | 173315587 (Comments: 1) | AdrianGC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-15 11:30:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173293600 (Comments: 3) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dank je. Het clubhuis had ik even gemist. Inderdaad is één keer taggen voldoende, maar de naam stond hier al op de velden. Vandaar dat ik het had aangepast. commented 2025-10-15 11:26:10 UTC by Rene1974 ♦7 |
| 173311314 (Comments: 2) | MusicForMellons (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice, Dankjewel! commented 2025-10-15 11:23:19 UTC by MusicForMellons ♦1 |
| 85458902 (Comments: 2) | nlehuby (Discussed changesets: 40) | Bonjour, effectivement, ça semble être un nom identique sans rapport avec la marque de restaurants, j'ai fait la correction pour ceux qui existent encore. Merci de votre vigilance. commented 2025-10-15 11:22:14 UTC by nlehuby ♦112 |
| 173158577 (Comments: 1) | A Australian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number. For freecall numbe... commented 2025-10-15 11:08:48 UTC by tastrax ♦1,164 |
| 172743682 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 155) | Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173313579 commented 2025-10-15 10:35:23 UTC by IvaLedinščak ♦38 |
| 172740405 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 155) | Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173312912 commented 2025-10-15 10:21:15 UTC by IvaLedinščak ♦38 |
| 172819772 (Comments: 1) | Семён Семёнов (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dHQ. What ist the mean of the tag funnel=yes? commented 2025-10-15 10:21:06 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
 | 173221692 (Comments: 1) | MUGISHA Balaka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please notice the spelling of the key highway (instead of higway, iIwill correct this) commented 2025-10-15 10:07:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173250002 (Comments: 4) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 7) | okej poprawiłem oneway na całej obwodnicy i węźle przy AZE, w strefie handlowej tj ul. Polska jest teraz unclassified, a ul. Francuska jest service. Jeśli chodzi o ul. Kolejową, obecnie jest ona tylko residential i to ślepa bo nie ma tam dojaz... commented 2025-10-15 10:05:53 UTC by Multidragon ♦5 |
| 161078661 (Comments: 1) | Sai_Dontukurti (Discussed changesets: 2) | So what brings #Youthmappers to Manchester? Did you visit? Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-15 09:54:48 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,399 |
| 173271495 (Comments: 4) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 7) | ok dodałem te wszystkie maxspeedy commented 2025-10-15 09:53:01 UTC by Multidragon ♦5 |
| 172974647 (Comments: 1) | RedAuburn (Discussed changesets: 162) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889916461. What is the mean of the tags pub_cat = yes pub_cat:name=Penny ? Regardless of whether this is a useful entry, business:pet=cat business:pet:name=Penny |
| 156265879 (Comments: 3) | map per (Discussed changesets: 91) | Das Gebiet gibt es definitiv noch. Also kein Handlungsbedarf. commented 2025-10-15 09:39:11 UTC by Arminus ♦42 |
| 173270271 (Comments: 2) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 7) | poprawione commented 2025-10-15 09:35:23 UTC by Multidragon ♦5 |
| 173299982 (Comments: 1) | David White professor (Discussed changesets: 14) | There is no sign here with the admission price. Would you like to update the node to show the actual information? Also move it to the correct location. commented 2025-10-15 09:34:17 UTC by lostmike ♦66 |
 | 173264435 (Comments: 1) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Please don't merge different sections blindly. Eg some are `indoor=yes` to be distinguished from `covered=yes` commented 2025-10-15 09:15:53 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,618 |
| 173259126 (Comments: 3) | Abaluni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-15 09:12:34 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦39 |
| 172139460 (Comments: 2) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 19) | You should not ask the last user. It's not the one responsible. commented 2025-10-15 08:59:23 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,618 |
| 173231636 (Comments: 3) | De C (Discussed changesets: 20) | This is not sufficient. 8 Waterloo Rd is `=8 Waterloo` . not the same. `=No.8 Clear Water Bay Rd` needs to be discussed. commented 2025-10-15 08:58:36 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,618 |
| 173308932 (Comments: 1) | epslabs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-15 08:54:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
 | 173308859 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 107) | Използван за малко и Bing Streetside... commented 2025-10-15 08:50:24 UTC by Fraxi ♦155 |
| 173308428 (Comments: 1) | Salihandro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-15 08:42:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173280506 (Comments: 3) | karlol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Rückmeldung. Bitte dann nicht den Node löschen, sondern ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix nutzen. Das habe ich nun gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173308059. Die... commented 2025-10-15 08:31:17 UTC by aixbrick ♦864 |
| 167692496 (Comments: 4) | Geofreund1 (Discussed changesets: 142) | Tut sich da noch was? commented 2025-10-15 08:18:36 UTC by Geofreund1 ♦289 |
| 173271711 (Comments: 4) | amosharper (Discussed changesets: 15) | Example not:name=* additions, from 13 years ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/13267861 commented 2025-10-15 08:14:19 UTC by amosharper ♦33 |
| 173288486 (Comments: 1) | Hekopath (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Hekopath, willkommen bei OSM. Schön dass du uns hilfst die Karte zu verbessern. StreetComplete ist dazu der ideale Einstieg. Bitte aber gedankenlos alle Fragen von SC abarbeiten. Das Erfassen der nicht vorhandenen Beleuchtung auf Wald-... commented 2025-10-15 08:12:23 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,401 |
 | 173307072 (Comments: 1) | kenken234 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Forgot i made edits around Bishan as well in this changeset commented 2025-10-15 08:05:00 UTC by kenken234 ♦34 |
| 173293343 (Comments: 3) | Sander H (Discussed changesets: 85) | Het duurt nog maanden voordat hier iemand kan komen nu het nog een gesloten bouwterrein is, dat is ook niet de bedoeling. Laat dan de wegen gewoon achterwege. Je hoeft geen voorschot te nemen op de verre toekomst. commented 2025-10-15 08:01:10 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦677 |
| 173306168 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 114) | No es una importación. Edición manual para añadir barreras y números de portal conforme a Catastro, PNOA Spain y CDAU. commented 2025-10-15 07:42:02 UTC by dcapillae ♦382 |
| 173289433 (Comments: 2) | Losta38 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, C'est noté je corrige tout ça commented 2025-10-15 07:31:18 UTC by Losta38 ♦1 |
 | 173200852 (Comments: 1) | Sergej011 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravo Sergej011, Dobrodošao u OSM zajednicu. Vidim da si napravio nekoliko promena na Altini. Samo nastavi, dobri maperi su uvek dobrodošli. Ipak, imam nekoliko sugestija: 1. Obriši naziv stadiona &qu... commented 2025-10-15 07:28:22 UTC by MaliMrav ♦52 |
| 162001600 (Comments: 2) | Zarr (Discussed changesets: 15) | I had based it on the aerial imagery / the right-in / right-out configuration of the north leg of the intersection. It can probably be undone if there isnt any local signage. commented 2025-10-15 07:26:19 UTC by Zarr ♦13 |
| 173288375 (Comments: 1) | Lyon-St-Clair (Discussed changesets: 90) | Je viens d'y passer en vélo ce matin, non, ce n'est pas un cul de sac, le passage est connecté, bitumé. Il y a un panneau "Céder le passage" avec la nouvelle piste cyclable. commented 2025-10-15 07:26:16 UTC by Gustry ♦2 |
| 173214950 (Comments: 2) | Gustry (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je ne suis pas sur de comprendre le message. Je n'ai pas touché la rue du Mas Rouge dans ce changeset. Peut-être une typo sur la rue du Mas de Brousse, dont j'ai enlevé le tag cul du sac dans ce changeset, car ce ... commented 2025-10-15 07:25:01 UTC by Gustry ♦2 |
| 127692513 (Comments: 2) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 16) | An update that the URL in the source tag is no longer incorrect as it no longer includes ";streetlevel imagery" in the URL. When I created this changeset, the URL in the source tag previously included ";streetlevel imagery" in the... commented 2025-10-15 07:19:56 UTC by Frank Peng ♦27 |
| X | 173299452 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey there, I have a nice tip for you: keep your changesets local. Trust me, it will save you a lot of trouble and make your reviewers happy. Here’s what you need to do: • stick to one area at a time (like a city, a distric... commented 2025-10-15 07:15:16 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,940 |
| 173288054 (Comments: 3) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Mir ging es nur um den Typo, da mir der Name ungewöhnlich erscheint. Und eine Buslinie im Westerwald korrekt zu erfassen, ist etwas schwierig, da die schon mal Schlenker in die Dörfer machen. Ich werde aber weiterhin versuche... commented 2025-10-15 07:11:02 UTC by berndw ♦623 |
 | 173017175 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please do not map national roads that do not exist, as you did at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19691913. Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/National_Roads for the list of known national roads. commented 2025-10-15 07:04:46 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 173289855 (Comments: 1) | PatrickMRandall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! But you add the ALPR camera to a bridge, not to a point that is close to the road on the left or right. commented 2025-10-15 07:03:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173269181 (Comments: 2) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Bienson, wenn Namen keine Beschreibungen sind, wie soll bitte dann die jeweilige Örtlichkeit kenntlich gemacht werden? Wir als Friedhöfe Dortmund - Eigenbetrieb der Stadt Dortmund - benötigen diese Ergänzungen für un... commented 2025-10-15 06:59:27 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦1 |
| 140284015 (Comments: 2) | Colin Smale (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hi Paul, Thanks for your observation! The deletion was correct. Llangwm was a separate community until 2022, when it was merged with Llantrisant Fawr. I meant to delete it when I made that edit, but I must have missed it and someone else go... commented 2025-10-15 06:59:07 UTC by Colin Smale ♦322 |
| 173304427 (Comments: 1) | MATHI RESIDENCY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-15 06:57:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173274470 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173304340 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen commented 2025-10-15 06:50:52 UTC by Bienson ♦331 |
| 173265192 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173304340 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen commented 2025-10-15 06:50:50 UTC by Bienson ♦331 |
| 173274088 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173304340 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen commented 2025-10-15 06:50:45 UTC by Bienson ♦331 |
| 169231295 (Comments: 2) | sapphir (Discussed changesets: 13) | Cześć, nazwa powinna być tylko nazwą własną. Wszystkie pozostałe szczegóły powinny iść do 'description'. Również typ obiektu (pensjonat, pizzeria, sklep itp.) nie powinien być częścią nazwy. Widzę, że d... commented 2025-10-15 06:50:36 UTC by uprkos ♦56 |
| 173264461 (Comments: 1) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Hallo, wenn ich es richtig sehe, ging es um das Tag "oneway=no". Hinweis: bei fünf der acht geänderten Wege erscheint jetzt in StreetComplete prompt wieder die Frage "Ist dies eine Einbahnstraße? In welche Richtung?&... commented 2025-10-15 06:47:48 UTC by Buffty ♦18 |
| 173297854 (Comments: 1) | Kellie Marks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You seem to be having problems finding your way to an address. If you need this for a drawing, do not enter it in the data. Check whether the address is entered correctly (at the main building, not on the way to the house). If you nee... commented 2025-10-15 06:46:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 91714457 (Comments: 2) | User1 - Lightcyphers (Discussed changesets: 150) | but that's not a roof... commented 2025-10-15 06:45:22 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦350 |
| 173300222 (Comments: 1) | rios2212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You only add a node without any description. a typical surveillance camera node has the following keys (all values are example). camera:type=fixed man_made=surveillance manufacturer=Flock Safety manufacturer:wikidata=Q1... commented 2025-10-15 06:37:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
 | 172557025 (Comments: 3) | chrsmsk (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bsp. Der aufgelassenen Pfad südlich des Schwendterjochs ist grad an der Grenze, man kann ihn noch gehen ohne größere Probleme , aber er verschwindet zunehmend weil die Forststrasse gebaut wurde. Falls dort Windwurf etc. dazukommt, wi... commented 2025-10-15 06:34:04 UTC by chrsmsk ♦20 |
| 167788314 (Comments: 1) | Vyacheslav 89 (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer ? :)) commented 2025-10-15 06:31:16 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦350 |
| 173303538 (Comments: 1) | jacklynnemarderpsychotherapy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-15 06:30:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173235918 (Comments: 2) | kirmonkey (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi. Yes, the PROW is what I'd consider 'permanently blocked'. It was fenced and tied up by the property owner. (the PROW went down their driveway etc. etc.) What I did in this case was walk back west about 40m and take t... commented 2025-10-15 06:30:28 UTC by kirmonkey ♦6 |
| 173301203 (Comments: 1) | GasaiYuno (Discussed changesets: 58) | Please be aware of the spelling of "Block". commented 2025-10-15 06:29:42 UTC by samho1234567 ♦26 |
| 173037544 (Comments: 3) | timmito (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hallo timmito, da hast du recht, das tut mir Leid. Ich habe amenity=school vom Gebäude wieder entfernt und die Kontaktinformationen für das Schulgelände übernommen. Vielen Dank für die hilfreichen Links. Ich hoffe, so passt e... commented 2025-10-15 06:29:30 UTC by stadtnavi Herrenberg ♦1 |
| 69500362 (Comments: 2) | James Derrick (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi, A lot has happened in in five years, but this section is about 50% complete now, with major work moving further east due to house builder activity: https://lhcrt.org.uk/news-page/ None of this section is in water, so at best waterway... commented 2025-10-15 06:28:51 UTC by James Derrick ♦79 |
| 84074207 (Comments: 1) | Vyacheslav 89 (Discussed changesets: 12) | здравствуйте, а подскажите плиз, а откуда инфа про "кластеры" и их номера в орнитологическом парке (например этот объект - https://www.openstr... commented 2025-10-15 06:24:33 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦350 |
| 172993068 (Comments: 2) | Emilio L (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ok, I wasn't aware of that! Thank you very much for your comment! commented 2025-10-15 06:17:49 UTC by Emilio L ♦5 |
| 173243526 (Comments: 1) | hypamaps (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've removed several duplicated highway sections, re-warnings above commented 2025-10-15 05:59:05 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,941 |
| 173247528 (Comments: 4) | 617-boston-movers (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thanks, user_5359! commented 2025-10-15 05:56:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,589 |
| 173284400 (Comments: 1) | Morariu Oana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correct, validated. commented 2025-10-15 05:53:15 UTC by mihaicoli ♦1 |
| 173281731 (Comments: 4) | Radu Silveanu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bună ziua, am găsit cu greu modul în care Open Street Map clasifica drumurile dar am găsit. Am greșit, nu mai fac. Mulțumesc pentru că mi-ați spus și îmi cer iertare pentru problemele create. O zi cât mai bună vă doresc. commented 2025-10-15 05:52:08 UTC by Radu Silveanu ♦2 |
| 173096213 (Comments: 2) | melody_Tej (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Romwriter, Thank you for reverting the changeset. I will be more aware of edit histories in my future edits. commented 2025-10-15 05:45:38 UTC by melody_Tej ♦17 |
| 173187036 (Comments: 7) | schoka (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ich habe es im Forum gesehen, danke dir. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-15 05:41:38 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173301984 (Comments: 1) | lonestartruckdrivingacademy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-15 05:39:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173240721 (Comments: 1) | hypamaps (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, Some of the warnings above need to be corrected. commented 2025-10-15 05:25:08 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,941 |
| 167860285 (Comments: 2) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi Mxdanger for pointing this out. I have made the corrections and I will be more aware of the member ordering in relations. commented 2025-10-15 05:14:33 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦31 |
 | 173266907 (Comments: 2) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi muralito, Thank you for reaching out. The Maproulette instruction was to split the geometry at node 1759328137 which I separated, the others were additional edits in the area. I removed the one-way tag initially, but then I realized there wa... commented 2025-10-15 05:12:45 UTC by Gorger ♦37 |
| 173301047 (Comments: 2) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://vvta.org/flex/needles/ commented 2025-10-15 04:50:34 UTC by ieguy3 ♦4 |
| 173117161 (Comments: 1) | KPM12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Holes shouldn't have "names" typically. There are rare exceptions, but the hole is not named "1". It has a reference number of "1" and that's how you know which hole it is. Please don't add names in the fu... commented 2025-10-15 04:31:21 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
| 172893297 (Comments: 2) | anti-caveman (Discussed changesets: 19) | В этом проекте Донбасс есть Украина поетому для улиц и еще некоторых обьектов единственным языком картографирования есть украиснкий |
| X | 169692454 (Comments: 2) | David White professor (Discussed changesets: 14) | I think I fixed all these commented 2025-10-15 03:26:37 UTC by David White professor ♦6 |
| 173251304 (Comments: 3) | seattlefyi (Discussed changesets: 35) | According to the aquariums own website on the “Calendar and Hours” page they are “CURRENTLY CLOSED FOR RENOVATIONS”, that reads more like construction to me commented 2025-10-15 03:25:46 UTC by Udarian ♦499 |
| 46963186 (Comments: 1) | T R SEBASTIAN (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5006592 - is it actually existing? commented 2025-10-15 03:25:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173291527 (Comments: 1) | Daitruxdd (Discussed changesets: 10) | Is "114 Bayard Street" the actual name of this or is it just the address? As mentioned before, a name is only a name and not an address. What source did you use for the name? commented 2025-10-15 03:06:23 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,062 |
| 148164492 (Comments: 1) | TJS (Discussed changesets: 7) | what you mean by "name=Royal (Proposed)" for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16966794/history ? what is its actual current name? commented 2025-10-15 03:01:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173000462 (Comments: 1) | mikko_tamura (Discussed changesets: 18) | Do you plan to cleanup mapping created at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/15.47452/120.35687&layers=N (these weird squares)? it is result of https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/11068/ that it seems that you have created commented 2025-10-15 02:55:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173236785 (Comments: 2) | BlissMaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: The flock device should be on a stand alone node. I like to look for a poles shadow to place them. Can you remove from the road? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173236785 |
| 118933217 (Comments: 3) | bob3bob3 (Discussed changesets: 27) | There's almost 8,000 place=farm in AU. It's probably a little to late to change. By the way, just because something doesn't render, doesn't mean that you should tag it otherwise. commented 2025-10-15 02:31:39 UTC by TheSwavu ♦564 |
| 172592171 (Comments: 4) | X_223- (Discussed changesets: 5) | 您好，我能从您最近的编辑中看到您确实对云南大学呈贡校区的重做做出了很大贡献，没有完全食言。之后如果需要动这么大的工程，可以删一点改一点，没有必要一次性推倒重来，这样真... commented 2025-10-15 02:22:56 UTC by shu0410 ♦31 |
| 173287361 (Comments: 1) | Artur Biega (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-15 02:22:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173292839 (Comments: 1) | Pomorze Zachonie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-15 02:22:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173288384 (Comments: 1) | endriu1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-15 02:22:45 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173289336 (Comments: 2) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 181) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1273400606... commented 2025-10-15 02:22:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173291169 (Comments: 3) | WTGZ_ (Discussed changesets: 99) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992254 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-15 02:22:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173255219 (Comments: 2) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 123) | danke :) commented 2025-10-15 02:14:51 UTC by Piagno ♦109 |
| 171926973 (Comments: 35) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | Y'know, maybe my eyes are trained to see Carto rendering with these three SEPARATE things (leisure=nature_reserve as boundary, natural=wood where they are, leisure=park if/as such manicured areas / "human sculpted land") exist, and may... commented 2025-10-15 02:07:25 UTC by stevea ♦312 |
| 173232412 (Comments: 1) | asushach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cадик (building=kindergarten) почему-то попал на район. Откатил. commented 2025-10-15 02:01:55 UTC by Zkir ♦8 |
| 164781472 (Comments: 1) | Jadher A (Discussed changesets: 5) | Por favor, corrija o mapeamento do estacionamento e evite duplicar as etiquetas em varios predios, se tem varios predios soltos pode add em um ponto central ou somente no predio central ou mapear toda a area com as etiquetas se precisar de ajuda ... commented 2025-10-15 01:54:27 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦65 |
| 172667535 (Comments: 2) | toyama_tokanawa (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/457412131#map=19/54.974170/73.395039 commented 2025-10-15 01:53:31 UTC by Mikhail Kuzin ♦4 |
| 164744959 (Comments: 1) | Jadher A (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oi, não se faz micromaping de estacionamento assim, tenha mais cuidado siga os exemplos da Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space commented 2025-10-15 01:49:42 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦65 |
| 173250216 (Comments: 1) | IceBotYT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! I saw this one the other day. Added additional tags to the camera. commented 2025-10-15 01:42:34 UTC by S-zation ♦114 |
| 173161417 (Comments: 2) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Disculpame, pero no llegué hasta ahí todavía. commented 2025-10-15 01:26:04 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦14 |
| 173294151 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 190) | https://x.com/VivamosVL/status/1978234129712898243 commented 2025-10-15 00:58:54 UTC by i2004 ♦161 |
| 173163069 (Comments: 2) | cccr210 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I intentionally removed the building tag for the barangay halls, as I normally see them as a whole area instead of one building. But I will fix that problem for now, and if the missing tag is qualifiable, I will do that so. Thank you for pointing tho... commented 2025-10-15 00:53:26 UTC by cccr210 ♦4 |
| 173296587 (Comments: 2) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | For Onatru, the official name is 'Onatru Farm Park and Preserve'. The park is cut in half by the road, but they are both part of the same park, so the names should be consistent. https://www.lewisborony.gov/media/23571 commented 2025-10-15 00:26:01 UTC by matthewfecica ♦5 |
| 173296868 (Comments: 2) | fortera_au (Discussed changesets: 41) | Please discuss this with the community on the most recent changeset regarding that object (other than this one), or on the community forum. commented 2025-10-15 00:22:59 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,365 |
| 173265236 (Comments: 1) | tczprka (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-15 00:22:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173273038 (Comments: 2) | kamil76w (Discussed changesets: 11) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-15 00:22:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173275092 (Comments: 10) | kamil76w (Discussed changesets: 11) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-15 00:22:34 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 169975769 (Comments: 2) | David White professor (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks. I appreciated this comment and tried to stop using the "Name" field in the way you described. I make updates via Organic Maps, which limits the types of fields that one is allowed to enter. The upshot is that it can provide exact ge... commented 2025-10-15 00:17:41 UTC by David White professor ♦6 |
| 173220162 (Comments: 2) | abhunter41 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Humm further... The larger area (way 1367194501) carries the tag shop=* and barnd information. I think this is correct, The relation than duplicates this shop information. Then the seperat building ways duplicate the brand info... commented 2025-10-15 00:11:22 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,674 |
 | 173290434 (Comments: 3) | rlaracol (Discussed changesets: 35) | Si tienes razón, me he expresado mal, voy a ceñirme a lo que se puede mejorar, la mayoría de polígonos de edificios no calzan con el edificio de la imagen, aún haciendo la proyección, de hecho pareciera que e... commented 2025-10-15 00:02:00 UTC by Lenny Andreu ♦12 |
| 173296695 (Comments: 1) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868 commented 2025-10-14 23:41:26 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,365 |
| 173296685 (Comments: 1) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868 commented 2025-10-14 23:41:26 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,365 |
| 173296664 (Comments: 1) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868 commented 2025-10-14 23:41:26 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,365 |
| 173296757 (Comments: 1) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868 commented 2025-10-14 23:41:26 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,365 |
| 173296564 (Comments: 1) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868 commented 2025-10-14 23:41:25 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,365 |
| 173296574 (Comments: 1) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868 commented 2025-10-14 23:41:25 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,365 |
| 173296649 (Comments: 1) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868 commented 2025-10-14 23:41:25 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,365 |
| 173295555 (Comments: 1) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 39) | 🐝 commented 2025-10-14 23:09:40 UTC by iandees ♦746 |
| 153480879 (Comments: 4) | Tyler806 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, I removed osm.org/way/1298676047 in changeset 173253101 commented 2025-10-14 22:54:14 UTC by jmapb ♦418 |
| 173009718 (Comments: 5) | GatunLake (Discussed changesets: 2) | O sentido da via é único, da rotatória em direção à ponte. Os cones que você deve ter visto provavelmente indicam operações excepcionais dos agentes de trânsito no local, normalmente... commented 2025-10-14 22:52:28 UTC by Pt873 ♦53 |
 | 173070681 (Comments: 2) | RiverBearings (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello J00SECI. I made the upgrade to primary to agree with the main route of the NIC-62 to the portions of Carretera Litoral del Pacífico that were changed to primary by others. Since only parts of Carretera Litoral del Pacífico are upg... commented 2025-10-14 22:33:35 UTC by RiverBearings ♦75 |
| 173250469 (Comments: 5) | Teevolve (Discussed changesets: 3) | You need to work with the author of your tool to implement a fix on their side. OSM has strict, well documented, standards on how to map everything from roads to golf courses to zoos. This isn't an OSM problem, it's a golf simulator problem... commented 2025-10-14 22:32:38 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
| 172948051 (Comments: 3) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 4) | I've no idea what "Starley Network" is - can you link to it? What is the link to the NCN5 that you can see? In my comment above I've linked to two superroute relations that both claim to be NCN5, in this changeset you'... commented 2025-10-14 22:30:50 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173258510 (Comments: 2) | RSR2003 (Discussed changesets: 3) | It is useless https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173295900 commented 2025-10-14 22:30:25 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦90 |
 | 74154948 (Comments: 4) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 135) | This is annoying me now. Five cables! https://dublinportmp2.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CP1770-ATK-01-ZZ-M2-CE-2721-Proposed-ESB-Network.pdf commented 2025-10-14 22:15:27 UTC by VictorIE ♦947 |
| 173257307 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 13) | This isn't a service road. commented 2025-10-14 22:04:49 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 162500409 (Comments: 5) | tyr_asd (Discussed changesets: 49) | > automated convenience store yes, interestingly, the butcher a couple houses down the road here was recently converted into a cashierless store: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5923097627 The tagging is much better, though: `sel... commented 2025-10-14 22:03:17 UTC by tyr_asd ♦447 |
| 173256092 (Comments: 2) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 14) | And of course, you have now damaged all bus route relations passing this roundabout, as you didn't remove needed segments out of the relations (what needs to be done now when you split the roundabout into parts). commented 2025-10-14 21:38:48 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
 | 173048700 (Comments: 1) | Вальдимар (Discussed changesets: 125) | Hello Вальдимар, I noticed you modified the junction at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396303940, using Esri World Imagery. I previously mapped this junction using Vantor satellite imagery from 2025-07-24, as Esri World Imagery is... commented 2025-10-14 21:33:39 UTC by maps_not_naps ♦6 |
| 173191033 (Comments: 2) | mkuentzl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Adjusted. commented 2025-10-14 21:31:41 UTC by mkuentzl ♦2 |
 | 173287627 (Comments: 1) | Bitmap Adoption (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-14 21:25:58 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173130551 (Comments: 4) | Misiek_G (Discussed changesets: 29) | Witaj, W takiej sytuacji na razie nie będę się już tego tykać. Zostawiam ci jednak wolną rękę i jeżeli uważasz wycofanie zmian za słuszne - zrób to. Na przyszłość postaram się inaczej podchodzić do istniejących już ob... commented 2025-10-14 21:21:02 UTC by Misiek_G ♦9 |
 | 173137112 (Comments: 2) | utvonalfelmeresek (Discussed changesets: 43) | Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173294372 commented 2025-10-14 21:20:58 UTC by infeeeee ♦593 |
| 173190984 (Comments: 2) | AndreyNumerus1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Acum am realizat ce am facut. A fost o greseala. Am avut ca scop sa conturez 2 terenuri si sa le trec la propietatea Farmland pentru un tutorial YT referitor la generarea hartiilor pentru Farming Simulator 25 care functioneaza prin acest progr... commented 2025-10-14 21:16:48 UTC by AndreyNumerus1 ♦1 |
| 173294091 (Comments: 1) | Zack MR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, added vet hospital, but forgot to do it in this change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173294222 commented 2025-10-14 21:15:20 UTC by Zack MR ♦1 |
| 173247066 (Comments: 2) | pan_borsuk (Discussed changesets: 68) | Automatic translation: This was the wrong link to the retagged building, the correct one is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095542473 Tłumaczenie automatyczne: To był nieprawidłowy link do budynku oznaczony ponownie, prawi... commented 2025-10-14 21:04:56 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦824 |
| 173176041 (Comments: 4) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 26) | Понял, исправлюсь в будущих правках commented 2025-10-14 20:59:17 UTC by empty_child ♦354 |
| 173197563 (Comments: 3) | dieter60 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich danke Dir! commented 2025-10-14 20:38:46 UTC by Romwriter ♦203 |
| 173245157 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Poprawiłem commented 2025-10-14 20:32:38 UTC by syntex ♦881 |
| 173247356 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Poprawiłem commented 2025-10-14 20:32:21 UTC by syntex ♦881 |
| 173241213 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Poprawiłem commented 2025-10-14 20:31:59 UTC by syntex ♦881 |
| 173238860 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Poprawiłem commented 2025-10-14 20:31:22 UTC by syntex ♦881 |
| 171279341 (Comments: 4) | the13thsense (Discussed changesets: 26) | please respond commented 2025-10-14 20:27:04 UTC by Udarian ♦499 |
| 173246677 (Comments: 1) | the13thsense (Discussed changesets: 26) | I am unsure if access=private applies to this road from Main Highway to way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156956870 as that service road seems to be part of the school and thus the question becomes is that service road for use by parents picking... commented 2025-10-14 20:26:41 UTC by Udarian ♦499 |
| 173291904 (Comments: 1) | Commonwealth Minuteman 66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera is located in the street and replaced the traffic signals? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173291904 commented 2025-10-14 20:22:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,184 |
| 173277675 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tag access = yes jest zbędny commented 2025-10-14 20:17:08 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173277451 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tagi access = yes i min_age = 0 są zbędne commented 2025-10-14 20:16:07 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173277192 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tag access = yes jest zbędny commented 2025-10-14 20:13:51 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173276940 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | W tagu colour kolor nie może być po polsku, tylko po angielsku i z małej litery commented 2025-10-14 20:12:40 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173275220 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Proszę o poprawę kształtu bieżni ponieważ jest ona prostokątna commented 2025-10-14 20:10:03 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173274939 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-14 20:09:30 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173274616 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Proszę o poprawę tych parkingów zgodnie z Ortofotomapą wysokiej rozdzielczości commented 2025-10-14 20:08:05 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173291210 (Comments: 1) | Monstrofil (Discussed changesets: 20) | Додайте не тільке назву, а приставу вулиця провулок commented 2025-10-14 20:04:41 UTC by kamasytrix ♦43 |
| 173274148 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Po co te wszystkie "place zabaw"? Tutaj wystarczy jeden plac zabaw i ewentualnie dodanie poszczególnych elementów placu jako punktów commented 2025-10-14 19:55:39 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 173221779 (Comments: 1) | Azbestcik (Discussed changesets: 182) | Cześć, Jakie jest źródło tej ścieżki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441859514 Nie widziałem jej podczas spaceru. commented 2025-10-14 19:35:29 UTC by Tomasz Buchholz ♦28 |
| 173278074 (Comments: 1) | gracznikt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tag, którego użyłeś jest kompletnie bez sensu, i lepiej jest nic nie dodawać, niż robić coś takiego. Poza tym do oznaczenia zbiorników używamy innych tagów. commented 2025-10-14 19:22:49 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦16 |
| 102099842 (Comments: 1) | orhygine (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Sur ce changeset tu as modifié ce terrain : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809844485 en le passant de farmland à construction. Sur l'Ortho Express 2025 il n'y a aucune construction, juste de l'herbe.... commented 2025-10-14 19:20:26 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦40 |
| 173286799 (Comments: 1) | Waveif (Discussed changesets: 1) | Po co robić tutaj multipolygon? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19715213 Przecież to spokojnie może funkcjonować jako jeden obszar. commented 2025-10-14 19:07:05 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173240058 (Comments: 2) | Traffikant (Discussed changesets: 5) | oha, gerade hier an dieser schrecklichen Stelle - wie passend, aber es war "no" gemeint, der Weg führt ja von der Detmelder zur Aachener und wieder zurück zur Detmolder Str. Danke für den Hinweis und die vielen Bilder! commented 2025-10-14 19:06:32 UTC by Traffikant ♦4 |
| 173174988 (Comments: 1) | maori74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo maori74, abgerissene Gebäude sollten lieber mit demolished:building=... getaggt werden, statt sie zu löschen. Dies verhindert, dass andere OSM-Benutzer auf Basis (veraltete) Satellitenbilder ein Gebäude wieder karti... commented 2025-10-14 19:00:20 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦31 |
| 170830686 (Comments: 1) | Bertyocx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Bertyocx, eigentlich ist es nicht notwendig Fußwege an Straßen extra zu mappen. An den Straßen in dem Wohngebiet war bereits der Tag sidewalk eingetragen. wenn Du nun meinst die Fußwege extra mappen zu müssen... commented 2025-10-14 18:59:04 UTC by Gino-52 ♦71 |
| 156661357 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo JGiesen123, bei Weg 1149708337 hast Du den Fehlerhaften Access-Tag mittlerweile selbst korrigiert. Bei dem anderen Weg hab ich die Fehlerhafte Änderung zurück gerollt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173290123 |
| 173289458 (Comments: 1) | leeuw01 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Lijkt me oke zo. Het gezondheidscentrum heeft wellicht ook een adres. Wanneer dat een identiek adres is kun je datzelfde adres toevoegen. Groet.. eggie commented 2025-10-14 18:53:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 156660975 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo JGiesen123, ich hab Deine Änderung zurück gerollt. Dieser Tag ist implizit für sämtliche Straßen in Deutschland gültig wo Bürgersteige existieren. Ein Nutzen erschließt sich mir nicht, diese redu... commented 2025-10-14 18:49:08 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦75 |
| 156661086 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo JGiesen123, die Änderung am Node wurde von mir zurück gerollt, wegen falscher Anwendung des Access-Tags, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values https://www.openstreetmap.org/c... commented 2025-10-14 18:42:12 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦75 |
| 171328691 (Comments: 2) | anshanin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello. Thank you. Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173289764 commented 2025-10-14 18:42:04 UTC by anshanin ♦20 |
| 173277730 (Comments: 3) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 543) | At least the ones that match are candidates for clearing the name without loss of information. But there are errors too, I had noted w.1425467008 (and 3 adjacent) where one field has BN1 2xx and the other BN2 1xx. And setting your query to &quo... commented 2025-10-14 18:38:37 UTC by Cebderby ♦304 |
| 156660952 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Diese Änderung wurde von mir zurückgerollt, da Du die access-Regeln falsch angewendet hast. Access-Regeln sind eine legale Beschränkung die es hier nicht gibt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173289563 In Deutschl... commented 2025-10-14 18:37:23 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦75 |
| 156660817 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo JGiesen123, Ein Tor ermöglicht einen Zugang für einen gewissen Personenkreis, damit ist eine generelle Zugangsbeschränkung fehlerhaft. Ich habe Deine Änderung zurückgerollt: https://www.openstre... commented 2025-10-14 18:32:36 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦75 |
| 166171576 (Comments: 4) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 36) | In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173289272 gemacht. commented 2025-10-14 18:25:32 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 156660699 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo JGiesen123, diese Änderung ist falsch und wurde mittlerweile rückgängig gemacht. Bitte lies https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access Money quote: "Access tags pre-eminently describe l... commented 2025-10-14 18:23:31 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦75 |
| 145381413 (Comments: 1) | OpenStreetMap_Editor_Appleton (Discussed changesets: 1) | hey, is it a national flag or what? please reply, thanks =D commented 2025-10-14 18:22:46 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦101 |
| 156660263 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo JGiesen123, ich hab dieses Changeset zurückgerollt, access-regeln gelten für "alle". Ein Privatweg ist nicht unzugänglich für alle, sondern der Zugang ist auf einen Personenkreis beschränkt. Dami... commented 2025-10-14 18:19:04 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦75 |
| 165816393 (Comments: 2) | pps345 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Since the center points of the cantons can be calculated from the present data, it is not necessary to add them to OSM. They were removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173255219 If (and only if) there's a physical feature pres... commented 2025-10-14 18:18:39 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 156660180 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo JGiesen123, ich hab dieses Changeset zurückgerollt, access-regeln sind rechtliche Beschränkungen, nicht dafür "zugewachsene Wege" zu markieren. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173288686 Stat... commented 2025-10-14 18:12:57 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦75 |
| 173288269 (Comments: 1) | leeuw01 (Discussed changesets: 8) | review_requested \tyes Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173288269 Even van links naar rechts -Bij healthcare doctor ontbreekt amenity=doctors. Het zal anders niet renderen. -Adres nr 3A is z'n A kwijt? |
| 173284329 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Danke. Habs geändert. Hoffe es passt irgendwie. Ich glaube über StreetComplete ist es einfacher einzutragen. commented 2025-10-14 18:11:56 UTC by matze089 ♦31 |
 | 173093239 (Comments: 2) | dav23r (Discussed changesets: 3) | yes, my bad. commented 2025-10-14 18:06:47 UTC by dav23r ♦1 |
| 165836656 (Comments: 1) | Achim Schmitt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215036660/ wurde von track auf cycleway geändert. Welche Beschilderung ist an dem Weg aufgestellt bitte? Gruß commented 2025-10-14 18:06:39 UTC by Lokai ♦478 |
| 173255329 (Comments: 1) | votkostya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Such an edit is a vandalism. I've reverted it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173287836 commented 2025-10-14 17:47:18 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦188 |
| 173286288 (Comments: 2) | robvanderploeg (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #173287587 commented 2025-10-14 17:41:23 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173258419 (Comments: 2) | scai (Discussed changesets: 28) | Yes, I fully agree. It is a contradiction after all and thus it should get fixed :) commented 2025-10-14 17:40:24 UTC by scai ♦273 |
| 171538990 (Comments: 2) | mathis57 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, j'ai normalement fait la correction dans un nouveau groupe de modification. commented 2025-10-14 17:38:39 UTC by mathis57 ♦5 |
| 172246321 (Comments: 2) | mathis57 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Salut, Je note et je ferai la màj concernant tout ça, merci de ton retour :) commented 2025-10-14 17:35:02 UTC by mathis57 ♦5 |
| 173076431 (Comments: 3) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 324) | Du hast die Pipeline schon "gerazed". Die verschwindet wahrscheinlich auch in den nächsten Tagen, daher ist sie schon weg, oder? commented 2025-10-14 17:33:33 UTC by EM311 ♦20 |
| 173115545 (Comments: 12) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | > How could we count these L1+2 Russian and English speakers? good starting point would be checking when English/Russian was taught in schools and how many people are alive from that years it will overestimate prevalence of Russian (... commented 2025-10-14 17:29:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173280233 (Comments: 1) | Ayah El-Taher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. In addition, the start and end of a s... commented 2025-10-14 17:25:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173257384 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 543) | and thanks for adding it! tagfiddling like this is quite trivial to do and can be easily done remotely (I edited it from Poland) while adding shop would not be so easy :) commented 2025-10-14 17:23:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 172166976 (Comments: 7) | camilleMa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pas de problème, je pense avoir corrigé les problèmes plus tôt commented 2025-10-14 17:23:02 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 160386215 (Comments: 1) | JGiesen123 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hey kannst Du bitte erklären warum Du foot=no setzt bei sidewalk=right, und vor Ort keinem Schild das Zutritt verbietet? Das ergibt sich aus der Situation vor Ort für mich überhaupt nicht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/w... commented 2025-10-14 17:18:20 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦75 |
| 167163617 (Comments: 2) | katpatuka (Discussed changesets: 119) | I'm using zhwiki as source where it shows as [帮达镇](https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/帮达镇) and 邦达镇 is a redirect to it. If that is incorrect please change it on zhwiki. commented 2025-10-14 17:15:25 UTC by katpatuka ♦198 |
| 171330810 (Comments: 5) | Interteutones (Discussed changesets: 80) | Das stimmt, aber der tag noexit=yes kommt nicht an die Stelle des Schildes, sondern an die letzte node des Weges sofern der Weg die in den Links genannten Bedingungen erfüllt. :) commented 2025-10-14 17:13:51 UTC by Bierphysik ♦91 |
| 173189535 (Comments: 6) | Hodgepig (Discussed changesets: 2) | Knowing every house and having enough friends round the village to ask them their postcodes sounds like a good approach and shouldn’t be legally problematic at all. The problems potentially arise when people mass-copy postcodes into OSM,... commented 2025-10-14 17:03:10 UTC by gurglypipe ♦936 |
 | 173234521 (Comments: 1) | erwan5503 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vous avez mis amenity=fountain. C’est ceci : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fountain?uselang=en Vraiment une fontaine en pleine nature ? Je crois qu’il y a une erreur → peut-être ceci &eac... commented 2025-10-14 17:00:23 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,573 |
| 173281617 (Comments: 2) | Radu Silveanu (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK. O sa citesc. Multumesc. Presupun ca esti nervos sau scrii in viteza. Toate cele bune. commented 2025-10-14 16:55:53 UTC by Radu Silveanu ♦2 |
| 31938849 (Comments: 3) | Jose Riha (Discussed changesets: 73) | Hm, je to de facto, asi preto to renderer nepodporuje, ale príde mi to lepšie než highway=pedestrian, po dopravnom ostrovčeku sa väčšinou nechceš prechádzať :). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/T... commented 2025-10-14 16:53:20 UTC by Tomas_J ♦307 |
| 173283405 (Comments: 1) | Richard Sell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Richard, você poderia dizer qual o documento utilizado para afirmar que essa rua é "reconhecida" localmente? Caso não haja manifestação, essa edição será revertida, por desrespeitar as ... commented 2025-10-14 16:47:04 UTC by Tomio ♦27 |
| 173164417 (Comments: 5) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | As for the designation of living street. The closests one I'm aware of is Pike Place next to the Pikes Place Market in Seattle. Pedesrians, cyclyists and cars are all using the street. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:h... commented 2025-10-14 16:42:27 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 173226030 (Comments: 1) | Designer1 (Discussed changesets: 429) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441878752 Please don't use the "lollipop" style of mapping golf course elements as you've done in the URL above. You need to create proper multipolygon relations in order to map featur... commented 2025-10-14 16:41:05 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
| 173278674 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 304) | aha, access_control i dual_carriageway również można usunąć jako duplikaty commented 2025-10-14 16:40:06 UTC by pavvv ♦559 |
 | 173284737 (Comments: 1) | JuanGonzalez25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola JuanGonzalez25, bienvenido y gracias por tu contribución Para facilitar la colaboración y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que realizaste. Los c... commented 2025-10-14 16:37:25 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173279778 (Comments: 2) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 34) | Ou https://www.prixmiam.com/magasins/prixmiam-lanester/... commented 2025-10-14 16:33:03 UTC by trial ♦944 |
| 85016221 (Comments: 2) | mcompte (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola; com veus, aquesta edició la vaig fer fa 5 anys ja! Quan ho vaig fer, les obres estaven en marxa (no és que siguin projectades aquestes carreteres). Hi va haver moviments de terra. Fa anys que les obres es van aturar i actualment e... commented 2025-10-14 16:30:34 UTC by mcompte ♦2 |
| 173278699 (Comments: 1) | Heart of Sardinia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-14 16:11:35 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173277737 (Comments: 2) | Mex (Discussed changesets: 11) | that's ok, they were pretty easy to fix commented 2025-10-14 16:05:15 UTC by Mex ♦73 |
| 172794078 (Comments: 3) | Marsgame (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wieder hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173283095 commented 2025-10-14 15:56:22 UTC by Tatfahren ♦292 |
| 173164389 (Comments: 2) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | I can update to the next higher road. It is a legal street verified with the county database, as I explained. There is only 1 house on the street, so its basically a driveway/living street with a street name. The street name is required to receive ma... commented 2025-10-14 15:55:46 UTC by Dispatch_Cloud ♦3 |
| 173234863 (Comments: 1) | ChristianHasel (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Christian, die Frage kann ich dir leider nicht beantworten, dazu bin mit iD zu wenig vertraut. Aber die fehlenden/überschüssigen Wegabschnitte hab ich mit JOSM (meinem bevorzugten Editor) ergänzt bzw. entfernt. http... commented 2025-10-14 15:45:06 UTC by wolfgang8 ♦60 |
| 173093048 (Comments: 2) | OurtheCanal (Discussed changesets: 3) | Greetings Buraddo, Thanks for the information and confirming the demolition of this structure. I will defer to your edits here. commented 2025-10-14 15:39:42 UTC by OurtheCanal ♦3 |
| 173274253 (Comments: 4) | evgenykatyshev (Discussed changesets: 65) | Got it now. That's deletion via EveryDoor. I'll fix commented 2025-10-14 15:16:24 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦188 |
| 173280459 (Comments: 1) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 174) | Howdy :) check mal diesen "way": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90458560 Denke, da hast du dich verklickt, oder? Außerdem ein Hinweis: Versuch bitte mehr Objekte zu erhalten statt sie neu zu zeichnen. Manchmal ... commented 2025-10-14 15:10:21 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,639 |
| 173237786 (Comments: 5) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 4) | Térképezői szokás, ki hogy szeret címeket megadni, én azt szoktam, ha lehet akkor az épületre, ha több cím van egy épületen akkor a bejáratokra (itt én oda rakn&aac... commented 2025-10-14 15:01:31 UTC by infeeeee ♦593 |
| 149713420 (Comments: 2) | jakTTU2020 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Is this US 271 Bus route or US 271 Business? If it's a business route, it should have business spelled out to avoid ambiguation. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149713420 |
| 166579953 (Comments: 2) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 34) | Exact, mais j'ai mis à jour la boutique (franchisée) aussi parce qu'elle n'apparaît pas dans https://www.chopeetcompagnie.fr/trouver-chope-et-compagnie-cave-biere et le site https://chopeetcompagnie-lorient.fr/ n�... commented 2025-10-14 14:48:55 UTC by Lisapple ♦49 |
| 173279465 (Comments: 1) | leeuw01 (Discussed changesets: 8) | .. en zodra ze gaan bouwen maak je er landuse=construction van.. commented 2025-10-14 14:48:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173275367 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Why are you still adding filter roads that do not exist, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442140617? Stop it please. Only map what actually exists. commented 2025-10-14 14:46:45 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 173158690 (Comments: 5) | kupteri (Discussed changesets: 9) | Olen samaa mieltä arvionne kanssa, katso uusimmat säännöt linkistä. Näyttää siltä, että ne rajoittuvat taistelu- ja ampuma-alueelle. commented 2025-10-14 14:36:31 UTC by Ulle G ♦1 |
 | 171494423 (Comments: 1) | MoneyBadger (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is a changeset comment https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/why-was-my-post-flagged-as-spam/136842/5 commented 2025-10-14 14:36:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 173274974 (Comments: 1) | Vodevil_Mark (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi there :) as people have mentioned before: Please cite your sources when you change things. Your comment isn't helpful and you're jumping across all of Europe which makes it harder to check. Which leads me to: http... commented 2025-10-14 14:35:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,639 |
| 173274871 (Comments: 3) | leeuw01 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Je kunt evt een vlak maken met landuse=grass Wanneer het niet onderhouden wordt en ze gaan binnenkort bouwen dan landuse=greenfield. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-14 14:32:33 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173275021 (Comments: 4) | leeuw01 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Yep.. rustig aan. Het hoeft niet af vandaag 😀 commented 2025-10-14 14:29:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173254887 (Comments: 1) | MountSuckling (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks a lot for the discussion! commented 2025-10-14 14:29:09 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 173276543 (Comments: 1) | кинотеатр Богучар (Discussed changesets: 1) | Чтобы добавить кинотеатр недостаточно добавить имя к зданию. Нужно еще и добавить теги самого объекта. В случае с кинотеатрами\\магазина... commented 2025-10-14 14:24:22 UTC by s777n ♦304 |
| 164225218 (Comments: 1) | Felipe Barreiros (Discussed changesets: 2) | areas residencial ou com edificios não devem ser mapeados como areas verdes commented 2025-10-14 14:16:29 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦65 |
| 173019037 (Comments: 1) | mapfel (Discussed changesets: 4) | Teilweise revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173278068 siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173023627 commented 2025-10-14 14:15:53 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 173215579 (Comments: 2) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 53) | You have a valid point here. We are currently discussing the tags for public transport in Belgium, because the legacy way of having "operator" and "network" tags on every line but also every stop should perhaps be changed. commented 2025-10-14 14:14:18 UTC by multimob ♦77 |
| 164223339 (Comments: 1) | Felipe Barreiros (Discussed changesets: 2) | edificios devem ser mapeados individualmente commented 2025-10-14 14:13:15 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦65 |
| 166719766 (Comments: 1) | DoloresReis (Discussed changesets: 19) | arvores devem ser mapeadas como pontos não como areas verdes commented 2025-10-14 14:11:17 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦65 |
| 173277380 (Comments: 1) | leeuw01 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Je edits... Je kunt dan van dat vlak een grasveld maken landuse=grass commented 2025-10-14 14:09:31 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 171800986 (Comments: 8) | UtterClutter (Discussed changesets: 30) | removed postal code from name field (already tagged as postal_code) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173277730 commented 2025-10-14 14:09:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173019921 (Comments: 1) | mapfel (Discussed changesets: 4) | Teilweise revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173277386 siehe auch osm.org/changeset/173023627 commented 2025-10-14 14:06:58 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 173275175 (Comments: 1) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | Alle begin is moeilijk Zeker OSM in het begin. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de juiste adresnode. Er zit nog een adres op het gebouw. Een school tag je met amenity=school. Dat heb ik toegevoegd. Beter geen adresgegevens op gebouwomtrekken.<... commented 2025-10-14 14:03:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173276125 (Comments: 1) | leeuw01 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Info samengevoegd. shop=yes omgezet naar deli Probeer op de adresnodes bij te taggen. Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken in OSM. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-14 13:58:18 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173022831 (Comments: 1) | mapfel (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173276872 siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173023627 commented 2025-10-14 13:58:00 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 172842644 (Comments: 2) | jamesks (Discussed changesets: 113) | You also appear to have removed footpaths from OSM which appear on the Public Rights of Way overlay as public footpaths. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540698481 These should be mapped on OSM, even if they don’t appear on... commented 2025-10-14 13:56:26 UTC by gurglypipe ♦936 |
| 173275437 (Comments: 2) | leeuw01 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Snackbar samengevoegd met nr 59 commented 2025-10-14 13:56:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172841589 (Comments: 1) | jamesks (Discussed changesets: 113) | Why have you removed a lot of the public footpath network around North Stainmore/Argill? The Public Rights of Way overlay shows them as public footpaths, so even if they’re not regularly used (and don’t show up on Strava Heatmap), then sh... commented 2025-10-14 13:49:07 UTC by gurglypipe ♦936 |
| 173237893 (Comments: 1) | mbroadston (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello welcome to OSM. roads that are not accessible or private land is not valid reasons to removed them from OSM. Please read to understand the reason and the correct method to map these: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_... commented 2025-10-14 13:48:15 UTC by MassCartog ♦197 |
| 173274583 (Comments: 1) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tip, Niet name= gebruiken bij laadpalen We bv brand. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station ... Bij de pomp Dit zal niet de naam van de pomp zijn. Dus hier ook geen name= gebruiken... evt... commented 2025-10-14 13:47:12 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
 | 173226646 (Comments: 1) | lukasdrap (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, thanks for your edits! At the moment, these signals don't render on OpenRailwayMap because they are missing descriptive tags. here's a local example of how it should be rendered: https://openrailwaymap.app/#view=15.69/-36.848366... commented 2025-10-14 13:46:00 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦415 |
| 173242349 (Comments: 2) | Narendran Thanikavel (Discussed changesets: 5) | low quality* commented 2025-10-14 13:44:25 UTC by MassCartog ♦197 |
| 173272356 (Comments: 1) | FlieaTom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich habe das Changeset rückgängig gemacht, da die Höhenbeschränkung die Kaisermühlenstraße unter der Autobahnauffahrt betrifft, wo sie schon vorhanden war. Du hast sie dagegen bei der Autobahnauffahrt gese... commented 2025-10-14 13:41:39 UTC by Luzandro ♦937 |
| 173243725 (Comments: 2) | Narendran Thanikavel (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted Change. Narendran Thanikavel, please read through your changeset comments for feedback to help improve your mapping. Please read the wiki before using features. commented 2025-10-14 13:39:13 UTC by MassCartog ♦197 |
| 173225176 (Comments: 3) | Thundafox (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ich wüsste nicht, dass es da eine Warnung von ID gibt. Ich vermute mal du hast eine Warnung bekommen, weil ich die highway=platform in highway=footway umgewandelt hatte damit der Fußweg durchgängig ist. Als du die dann wieder raus... commented 2025-10-14 13:38:20 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,401 |
| 173244307 (Comments: 1) | Narendran Thanikavel (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello welcome to OSM. You are using the landuse\tresidential incorrectly. This changeset has ben reverted. Please read and understand features before you use them: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential commented 2025-10-14 13:30:55 UTC by MassCartog ♦197 |
| 173274209 (Comments: 5) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ik heb nr 10 hersteld en van nr 28 de postcode aangepast. Slepen lijkt logisch, maar beter niet doen. Ik gebruik vaak het trucje om de bedrijfsinfo te kopieren min het adres en dat combineer ik dan met het nieuwe adres. Zodra je gaat 'rommele... commented 2025-10-14 13:29:14 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173244450 (Comments: 1) | Narendran Thanikavel (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi welcome to OSM. When you are making outlines try to match what you see on the ground. Also if there are right angle corners, right click on them and select "square", or press the Q key to square the sides. Looks like you have a ne... commented 2025-10-14 13:28:34 UTC by MassCartog ♦197 |
| 173259508 (Comments: 2) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | Adresnode 10 hersteld commented 2025-10-14 13:25:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173273410 (Comments: 2) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dat kan dus niet, het is vrij beperkt maar wel een fijne app om 'even snel' aanpassingen te doen. Ik had verwacht dat het invullen van het adres dit zou mappen. commented 2025-10-14 13:22:13 UTC by Duncement ♦3 |
| 173273548 (Comments: 1) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | Deze heb ik ook samengevoegd met het bestaande adres. commented 2025-10-14 13:18:32 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 170326426 (Comments: 2) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ik wil mijn excuses aanbieden voor wat ik heb veroorzaakt. commented 2025-10-14 13:17:22 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦11 |
| 173145695 (Comments: 4) | maferikotupi (Discussed changesets: 46) | Il manquait une info à mon commentaire, ces points existaient déjà : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7319085412 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10153087493 commented 2025-10-14 13:16:56 UTC by josmougn ♦240 |
| 170326706 (Comments: 2) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ok wil excuses hiervoor aanbieden voor wat ik heb veroorzaakt. commented 2025-10-14 13:15:52 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦11 |
| 170335127 (Comments: 2) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ik stop. Van mij zult u en de andere geen overlast meer ervaren. commented 2025-10-14 13:14:49 UTC by jasperelderhorst ♦11 |
| 173260221 (Comments: 3) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | 👍 commented 2025-10-14 13:07:51 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
 | 172353995 (Comments: 2) | 3xp10r3r (Discussed changesets: 1) | The information I have is incomplete so I have removed it, sorry about that. commented 2025-10-14 13:02:34 UTC by 3xp10r3r ♦1 |
| 173215120 (Comments: 4) | nols420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alles klar, sollte in #173273944 gefixed sein. Danke für die Hilfe ;) commented 2025-10-14 12:57:17 UTC by nols420 ♦1 |
| 173263287 (Comments: 1) | Virkom (Discussed changesets: 2) | Отличный прогресс! commented 2025-10-14 12:51:45 UTC by bigopenmac ♦64 |
| 173123337 (Comments: 2) | sirish19 (Discussed changesets: 10) | sirish19さん こんにちは、初めまして ゴルフコースの編集を行なったようですが、本操作ですでに描かれている地物をすべて削除してから新しい地物を描いていないでしょうか？ OS... commented 2025-10-14 12:41:57 UTC by Ryo-a ♦2 |
 | 173266065 (Comments: 1) | Ezraso (Discussed changesets: 1) | תודה על התרומה! שתי הערות. א. לא מדובר באטרקציה תירותית. ב. נא לא להשתמש בשמות תאוריים הנחיות מלאות: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel |
| 173271979 (Comments: 1) | ingobell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tanto en los mapas de Google como de Apple, aparece el nombre correcto (aunque google tiene mal el codigo postal) commented 2025-10-14 12:38:04 UTC by ingobell ♦1 |
| 173267293 (Comments: 1) | HP Brown Sauce (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There are several warnings given above regarding this changeset. You dragged some highways out of alignment, which I've corrected. they were the 7 crossing_ways:highway-highway. There also seem to be s... commented 2025-10-14 12:36:33 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,941 |
| 173216682 (Comments: 3) | m_zahariev (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ами, щом още има хора на терен значи не е предаден. commented 2025-10-14 12:32:00 UTC by foreigner037 ♦58 |
| 173175143 (Comments: 1) | Mikhail Korovin (Discussed changesets: 1) | 这一块哪来的温泉？足浴这么表示的？ commented 2025-10-14 12:24:09 UTC by Taksine ♦115 |
| 173172569 (Comments: 3) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 8) | 訂正 削除している競技場タグ「leisure=pitch」 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch が付与されたウェイは、 landuse=recreation_ground も leisure=schoolyard も相応わしくない、極めて雑... commented 2025-10-14 12:21:05 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦26 |
| 173261596 (Comments: 1) | keepsafesecurity (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you have placed this business at two locations near each other. Is this intentional? commented 2025-10-14 12:14:50 UTC by nevw ♦2,049 |
| 173221628 (Comments: 3) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | każda wspólnota mieszkaniowa to teren prywatny xD No ale okej, alkoholicy tez mają prawo wiedzieć, że wstęp może byc im zabroniony gdy nawigują w mapycz drogę dojścia do płaza ;] commented 2025-10-14 12:14:35 UTC by Yog Sot ♦317 |
| 131536886 (Comments: 1) | Fantastic Fabian (Discussed changesets: 6) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005583 ? commented 2025-10-14 12:12:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173268807 (Comments: 1) | mbzdega (Discussed changesets: 1) | fajnie, ze sie bawisz w te nazwy ulic, ale polecam wskazywać źródła danych aby dało się zweryfikowac czy możesz mieć rację. Poza tym w tym zestawie zmian zrobiłeś bajzel, bo ci się źle poklikało i nie sprawdziłeś przed zapisem ... commented 2025-10-14 12:10:09 UTC by Yog Sot ♦317 |
| 173249574 (Comments: 2) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 7) | uczę się dopiero, ja rozumiem że interchange to węzeł drogowy, ok poprawę te oneway=-1 na yes commented 2025-10-14 12:09:02 UTC by Multidragon ♦5 |
| 173271468 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 38) | Total changes: 330 commented 2025-10-14 12:07:21 UTC by Tewuzij ♦23 |
| 173271049 (Comments: 1) | rahmagranite (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-14 12:00:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 62671558 (Comments: 1) | djakk (Discussed changesets: 13) | Salut, je crois que tu es bon pour remettre une couche ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21007730 commented 2025-10-14 11:59:27 UTC by trial ♦944 |
| 173234254 (Comments: 2) | Ayoub2049 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok thank you for advice, will do commented 2025-10-14 11:57:57 UTC by Ayoub2049 ♦1 |
| 173223209 (Comments: 3) | Patryk Piotrowski (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zestaw zmian: 173270546 - poprawiono adresy. commented 2025-10-14 11:47:34 UTC by Patryk Piotrowski ♦13 |
| 173270408 (Comments: 1) | Tisc3469 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Tisc3469, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work a... commented 2025-10-14 11:46:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173211092 (Comments: 1) | paolo caialbenga (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Paolo, per l'inserimento dei percorsi escursionistici vanno seguite le linee guida CAI/OSM che puoi trovare qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI La creazione è stata comunicata alla SEC CAI regionale e in Regione Pie... commented 2025-10-14 11:46:19 UTC by Andrea Del Sarto ♦73 |
 | 50155053 (Comments: 1) | __temm__ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dD1. What is the mean of 크기=1.93m*1.16m. Did you miss the key waterway=weir? And the value ist width * height? 안녕하세요! https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dD1를 확인해 주세... commented 2025-10-14 11:42:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173266844 (Comments: 2) | RonPot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Eggie, Ok, begrijp het. groeten, Ron commented 2025-10-14 11:41:06 UTC by RonPot ♦1 |
| 173220376 (Comments: 1) | Tuftolog (Discussed changesets: 1) | שלום, אין להוסיף שמות תאוריים כגון "מערה". או "ברז מים". הנחיות מלאות: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel commented 2025-10-14 11:38:09 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦634 |
| 108050117 (Comments: 4) | Sasa Uncanin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Sasa. Thank you to clarify it. Best regards, Znaika commented 2025-10-14 11:37:25 UTC by Znaika ♦121 |
| 173270086 (Comments: 1) | chargrillwakeforest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi chargrillwakeforest, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow ... commented 2025-10-14 11:36:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 172957380 (Comments: 4) | Nivseg (Discussed changesets: 1) | טופל ב-https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173270233 commented 2025-10-14 11:36:22 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦634 |
| 167178265 (Comments: 1) | artix4090 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Are you sure this campground is free? Reviews on other websites do not confirm that... commented 2025-10-14 11:32:56 UTC by okainov ♦15 |
| 148137807 (Comments: 1) | OldWeirdWoman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Are you sure the camping was free? commented 2025-10-14 11:29:35 UTC by okainov ♦15 |
| 173221820 (Comments: 2) | NAK-ISP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have also a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13230186513. What is the mean of the tags красне красне=школа синє синє=садок ? commented 2025-10-14 11:27:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173267726 (Comments: 1) | amos katompa (Discussed changesets: 16) | You may want to use the building tool (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools) for houses or alternatively press "Q" to orthagonalise the ways as most of the buildings are comprised of right angles commented 2025-10-14 11:20:34 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦49 |
| 162544415 (Comments: 1) | thopf (Discussed changesets: 22) | Interessant, woher kommt die Information eines 16,7Hz Kabels in den BBT? commented 2025-10-14 11:18:25 UTC by BigG_76 ♦1 |
| 166864947 (Comments: 12) | PulisakZ (Discussed changesets: 50) | No, problem and Karijoki is Bötom in Swedish - a new thing I learned today. Just let me know if you encounter any other interesting questions. I'll be glad to help out. commented 2025-10-14 11:12:09 UTC by houtari ♦52 |
| 173267388 (Comments: 2) | Jeroen Kransen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Eggie, ik dacht dat ik ze zo klein mogelijk had gehouden, maar ik zal voortaan echt de grens van het minimale zoeken. Ik volgde deze aanwijzingen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=nl commented 2025-10-14 11:05:50 UTC by Jeroen Kransen ♦2 |
| 173180250 (Comments: 1) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33645167 Zbędne reguły dostępu. commented 2025-10-14 11:05:00 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,036 |
| 173201816 (Comments: 1) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414455439 Jeśli obecnie ta droga nie prowadzi do domostw, to powinna pozostać highway=service. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018484583 Zgubiony segment. Zmiana z unclassified na resid... commented 2025-10-14 11:01:23 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,036 |
| 173267332 (Comments: 3) | Madorian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yep... bij mij alles slechter.. maar het vergeten wordt steeds beter. commented 2025-10-14 11:00:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173213661 (Comments: 1) | i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/389212391, https://www.osm.org/way/1441824297. What is the mean of the tag RUNTIME = QUALIFICATIONS? commented 2025-10-14 10:57:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173266902 (Comments: 2) | RonPot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Landuse hersteld commented 2025-10-14 10:41:14 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172306156 (Comments: 12) | Kiharu1410 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Can't blame them though, they're probably just trying to free up money for things like education, roads, and all that. commented 2025-10-14 10:38:32 UTC by Kiharu1410 ♦3 |
| 173187051 (Comments: 3) | JiahuiY (Discussed changesets: 12) | Are they actually intended for public use? Or do they just not put up barriers? There are water main ends sticking up on the path for example. commented 2025-10-14 10:31:06 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦39 |
 | 173267089 (Comments: 2) | ikromovam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Лучше делать меньше, но качественней, что бы потом за вами не перерисовывать commented 2025-10-14 10:28:59 UTC by addr: ♦27 |
| 171666013 (Comments: 5) | MWpg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-14 10:19:57 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦39 |
| 173219364 (Comments: 1) | Harzklub-BadGrund (Discussed changesets: 2) | Das Tagging ist falsch. Es muss eine "Objektart" bleiben. highway=path würde sich anbieten, wenn es noch als Pfad nutzbar ist. Die Sperrung eintragen access=no! foot=yes entfernen, denn es erlaubt die Nutzung als Fußgä... commented 2025-10-14 10:17:23 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,401 |
| 168439907 (Comments: 4) | Waaslander (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hello Woodpeck, Could I have your mailadres? I don't see how i can post here images. I can already answer briefly that in general most Farys pipelines are based on cadaster information. Where necessary markers like here help bridge knowle... commented 2025-10-14 10:14:43 UTC by Waaslander ♦59 |
| 120250335 (Comments: 1) | tastrax (Discussed changesets: 31) | HI, place=farm on a node does not render, possibly with a name it will. My personal preference is to tag a way for the homestead as building=farm possibly with a name from DCS Base Map. The farm name is probably the same but as a node it conta... commented 2025-10-14 10:05:27 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,674 |
| 173262565 (Comments: 1) | sapphir (Discussed changesets: 13) | Jako źródło wskazałeś "osm notes". Zapewne chodzi o https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4861968. Tam jest informacja o "wspólnej ścieżce rowerowej z chodnikiem", a Ty dodałeś highway=cycleway, czyli drogę dla... commented 2025-10-14 10:00:07 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173251396 (Comments: 10) | Madorian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Haantjebak heb ik als alt_name ingevoerd, want.... Wat is wat? Omdat de heuvel in een veel bezocht stuifzandgebied ligt, is de heuvel de laatste jaren geslonken. Tot in de jaren 50 stond op de heuvel een uitkijktoren. De namen Haantjebak en... commented 2025-10-14 09:57:27 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173210827 (Comments: 1) | druidexe1985 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Something went wrong with this import. All the objects don't have any valid tag. The mandatory link to the documentation of the import is missing. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines commented 2025-10-14 09:49:53 UTC by mueschel ♦6,683 |
| 173257435 (Comments: 2) | Reckless32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, it is closed permanently, we were there today. commented 2025-10-14 09:46:12 UTC by Reckless32 ♦1 |
| 173249810 (Comments: 3) | Deftax (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dzięki za radę - może rzeczywiście usunięcie całości to nie był najlepszy pomysł commented 2025-10-14 09:45:38 UTC by Deftax ♦4 |
| 172740819 (Comments: 9) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 19) | voici la photo : https://sig.af3v.org/index.php/view/media/getMedia?repository=rep1&project=veloroutes&path=media%2Fphotos%2F615-Barrie%CC%80re+2.jpeg commented 2025-10-14 09:26:53 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦177 |
| 168325714 (Comments: 2) | DerF1Freak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, Der Abschnitt zwischen Schulstraße 9 und 8/14 ist ein Fahrradweg/Fußweg. Es ist mit dem Auto nicht möglich von der Schulstraße 8 direkt auf die B5 zu fahren. Da mir dies in der Navigation aber so vorgeschlagen wurd... commented 2025-10-14 09:22:17 UTC by DerF1Freak ♦1 |
| 173262681 (Comments: 2) | Johan1946 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Er is bij mijn weten hier geen rest_area met voorzieningen (wlan?). Wel een parkeerstrook schuin aan de overzijde en die staat al op de kaart. Voorlopig verwijder ik je bijdrage. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-14 09:05:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173262167 (Comments: 1) | sapphir (Discussed changesets: 13) | Co to za punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13232356687 ? ;) commented 2025-10-14 08:57:35 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173211100 (Comments: 2) | Reisinformatiegroep (Discussed changesets: 84) | Thnx for your message and I will ignore the iD editor suggestions for public transport commented 2025-10-14 08:55:34 UTC by Reisinformatiegroep ♦47 |
| 173260789 (Comments: 1) | xkdx (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-14 08:51:36 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173251152 (Comments: 3) | Madorian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oke.. no problem. Je zou eens naar een reguliere editor kunnen kijken. Die apps zijn heel beperkt en kunnen niet goed met adresnodes omgaan. Je krijgt dan dubbele adressen. In OSM Nederland hoef je adressen aan te maken. Mapse eggie commented 2025-10-14 08:48:19 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173243874 (Comments: 1) | hashhar (Discussed changesets: 3) | I've edited the road to tag it as Pedestrian Street (highway=pedestrian) as per your fixme :) commented 2025-10-14 08:48:00 UTC by kasa kai ♦26 |
| 173262019 (Comments: 1) | BobWithAnR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Bob, De niet meer geldige afslagbeperking heb ik verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-14 08:46:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 158731856 (Comments: 2) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 19) | Salut, alors en effet j'ai mis à jour en fonction de la mise en oevre du plan de la ville, donc je n'ai pas eu de retour terrain à ce moment là. Le sens de circulation est bon, si on se réfère au orthophot... commented 2025-10-14 08:43:10 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦177 |
| 173261640 (Comments: 1) | SteftheGr8er (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM.. Bedankt voor je bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-14 08:42:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 170959576 (Comments: 1) | postown (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:building%3Dsports_hall https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:building%3Dschool commented 2025-10-14 08:37:10 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦26 |
| 173250848 (Comments: 1) | Felix the Fastest (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Felix the Fastest, auch hier ist: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway=signal%20box?uselang=de#Aufgegebene_Stellwerke. Zurückgebaute Stellwerke Füge razed:railway=signal_box hinzu. Für N... commented 2025-10-14 08:35:51 UTC by pitfire ♦693 |
| 173257990 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 28) | Gebruik voor de website-tag van filialen de filiaalpagina: https://www.kwik-fit.nl/vestigingen/leeuwarden/sixmastraat-11 Als je wil linken naar de algemene website, kun je brand:website gebruiken. commented 2025-10-14 08:31:41 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦677 |
| 173233981 (Comments: 1) | TBonanno (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao TBonanno La cima del Monte Petrano è già mappata, nel punto corretto poco più a Nord-Ovest di dove l'hai posizionata tu. Inoltre, i tag ADDR non hanno molto senso su un elemento naturale come una vetta. Se l'... commented 2025-10-14 08:29:22 UTC by dp7 ♦54 |
| 173250924 (Comments: 1) | Felix the Fastest (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Felix the Fastest, bitte keine Namensfelder für weiter Informationen nutzen. Das Gebäude ist bereits mit disused:railway=signal_box erfasst. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name Gleiches gilt... commented 2025-10-14 08:22:16 UTC by pitfire ♦693 |
| 172933507 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Drogi dojazdowe nie powinny mieć nazwy o ile nie mają one innej nazwy niż sąsiednie drogi główne. Edycja do wycofania. commented 2025-10-14 08:20:19 UTC by Marek-M ♦943 |
| 167730958 (Comments: 2) | Michal Jamrich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, sukromne servisce cesty v areali Milexu si pomenoval "Piestanska" (napr. Way: Piešťanská (262444897)). Podla ZBGIS tieto cesty nazov nemaju. Aky je zdroj (okrem 'local knowledge') tejto informacie? Je na mies... commented 2025-10-14 08:19:47 UTC by Tomas_J ♦307 |
| 168582544 (Comments: 3) | Zaneo (Discussed changesets: 12) | This area did not "designed for practising a particular sport". Because those white lines are line powder. Japanese students have played multiple sports on ground in school. (e.g. soccer, baseball or running) commented 2025-10-14 08:17:49 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦26 |
| 173047990 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | I recommend that you only map ways that exist according to Bing or Esri. If you are actually surveying Greece, please set source=* to "Survey (YYYY-MM-DD)". commented 2025-10-14 08:15:14 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
 | 173205191 (Comments: 1) | HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you for your corrections. And thank you for your advice on making changements. commented 2025-10-14 08:15:11 UTC by Henk Sufitrail ♦1 |
| 173261309 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 352) | Commentaar moet zijn ... landuse=construction aangepast commented 2025-10-14 08:13:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 154753986 (Comments: 1) | bellatrix_8 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Konumdan tam emin değilim. Muhtemel yanlış konumlandırdım. Sizler kontrol etmişsiniz. Bence mevcut konum kalmalı. Bu yer için, o bölgeye uğradığım anda tam konum belirlemeye çalışırım. Eğer konumda hata varsa tekrar... commented 2025-10-14 08:04:18 UTC by bellatrix_8 ♦2 |
| 173250739 (Comments: 3) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 16) | (BTW, would be great to have you on there, as you're one of the most experienced and knowledgeable mappers in the area that's currently active :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2025-10-14 08:03:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦48 |
| 171822794 (Comments: 5) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you. commented 2025-10-14 08:01:08 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦26 |
| 173260639 (Comments: 1) | aki007 (Discussed changesets: 7) | First time I'm touching a coastline. First time I'm touching administrative boundaries. I've checked bing, esri and sentinel-2 imagery and followed esri. I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes on this. I only did a small section for... commented 2025-10-14 07:56:33 UTC by aki007 ♦8 |
| 172167764 (Comments: 3) | okadatsuneo (Discussed changesets: 19) | >amenity=schoolのwikiにも「leisure=pitchを運動場のタグ付けに使う」と文章で記載されています。 タグはイギリス英語であり、英語版では「leisure=pitch is used for individual sports pitches. Where an in... commented 2025-10-14 07:55:07 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦26 |
| 173242145 (Comments: 1) | brbrpatapim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173260473 commented 2025-10-14 07:47:12 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173260070 (Comments: 1) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | Je oplaadpaal ligt midden in de straat. Wellicht kun je je wijzigingen controleren met een reguliere web editor als bv iD. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-14 07:43:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173259866 (Comments: 1) | Duncement (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag Duncement Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode. Svp bijtaggen op de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-14 07:40:28 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173242086 (Comments: 2) | brbrpatapim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173259837 Also, how is this connected to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5004597 ??? commented 2025-10-14 07:36:34 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
 | 173257915 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 13) | Please, please make smaller changesets. Since you've requested a review in this changeset a lot of mappers from central Europe which look for those have been alerted about this. commented 2025-10-14 07:32:48 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173186257 (Comments: 2) | iontonti (Discussed changesets: 1) | U pravu si, hvala, popravih commented 2025-10-14 07:32:08 UTC by iontonti ♦1 |
| 173242293 (Comments: 1) | brbrpatapim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173259959 commented 2025-10-14 07:31:55 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173259540 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 391) | Änderungen aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151822609, sorry copy-paste-Fehler... commented 2025-10-14 07:26:20 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 106258869 (Comments: 2) | overflorian (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hello, ravi de te retrouver ici après t'avoir croisé ! On a bien des photos Panoramax à cet endroit-là mais impossible de lire le numéro de référence. Je suis d'accord avec toi, le form... commented 2025-10-14 07:22:58 UTC by overflorian ♦51 |
| 151822609 (Comments: 4) | Halbtax (Discussed changesets: 28) | Ich habe den grössten Teil der Änderungen (an Gebäuden) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173259540 revertiert. Dies, damit ich https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173242086 korrigieren kann. commented 2025-10-14 07:21:11 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173242627 (Comments: 1) | Socramit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You move three node more than 100 meters. Please check all nodes from your change set. commented 2025-10-14 07:16:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173082615 (Comments: 2) | maramutze2018 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Moin, habe die Relation auf die Etappe geändert. Auf A2 und A4 habe ich nicht geachtet, sind aber wahrscheinlich nicht verlegt worden. commented 2025-10-14 07:09:18 UTC by maramutze2018 ♦5 |
| 173102217 (Comments: 4) | JLZIMMERMANN (Discussed changesets: 50) | the idea is the same than in sport leisure=sports_centre [out] leisure=pitch [in] commented 2025-10-14 07:03:21 UTC by JLZIMMERMANN ♦120 |
| 170051621 (Comments: 1) | zhanna-map-maker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello zhanna-map-maker, I removed this area because the Theresienwiese was already mapped with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23655360. Best regards map per commented 2025-10-14 06:55:14 UTC by map per ♦1,315 |
| 173231534 (Comments: 2) | Turtlehats (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kits, I was trying to map a provisional route for a walking event. I was referred to this platform by an organiser of a previous event. I think possibly my mistake was making the changes part of the public map rather than just a personal v... commented 2025-10-14 06:51:24 UTC by Turtlehats ♦1 |
| 173256905 (Comments: 1) | ZuzannaJózefowicz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-14 06:51:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173256872 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-14 06:51:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173158778 (Comments: 2) | Tex2002ans (Discussed changesets: 10) | Yes, thanks for spotting that. I fixed it in next changelog: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173207717 commented 2025-10-14 06:49:33 UTC by Tex2002ans ♦15 |
| 167434196 (Comments: 1) | Hélène OT La Vallée du Kiwi (Discussed changesets: 18) | bonjour au vu du commentaire, si le terrain n'existe plus il faudrait carrément supprimer l'objet et pas simplement son nom. Dites-moi si vous avez besoin d'aide. bonne journée commented 2025-10-14 06:49:22 UTC by Patchanka ♦407 |
| 172407136 (Comments: 2) | scai (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Mateusz! Done, thanks for the hint! commented 2025-10-14 06:47:42 UTC by scai ♦273 |
| 172652080 (Comments: 1) | Hélène OT La Vallée du Kiwi (Discussed changesets: 18) | bonjour c'est encore moi ^^ attention l'image ajoutée renvoie vers une page non disponible ! A corriger ou à supprimer commented 2025-10-14 06:45:52 UTC by Patchanka ♦407 |
| 172334765 (Comments: 1) | Hélène OT La Vallée du Kiwi (Discussed changesets: 18) | bonjour est-ce que par hsard, ces toilettes ne seraient pas ceux qui sont déjà enregistré dans OSM ici ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3027468361 commented 2025-10-14 06:43:13 UTC by Patchanka ♦407 |
| 172165774 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Clayton Harris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Do you know is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103568293 still under reconstruction? commented 2025-10-14 06:36:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173214361 (Comments: 1) | ZioDragon (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005156 ? (and thanks for all mapping!) commented 2025-10-14 06:35:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
 | 100551657 (Comments: 1) | 1021 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914223426/history what should be fixed here? commented 2025-10-14 06:34:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
 | 173216977 (Comments: 2) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 170) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172469911 commented 2025-10-14 06:29:18 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,709 |
| 172901581 (Comments: 1) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005137 ? commented 2025-10-14 06:22:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173197335 (Comments: 1) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4411266657/history ? commented 2025-10-14 06:22:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 172457522 (Comments: 1) | dugolf60 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005135 ? commented 2025-10-14 06:21:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 172493327 (Comments: 1) | dugolf60 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005134 ? commented 2025-10-14 06:21:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 172439652 (Comments: 1) | dugolf60 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005133 ? commented 2025-10-14 06:20:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173201004 (Comments: 1) | Sam0487 (Discussed changesets: 1) | r/18917358 is broken w/1441723765 interacts with w/543029646 commented 2025-10-14 06:20:34 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦14 |
| 173250946 (Comments: 1) | nelm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hej, vær venlig ikke at røre ved adressepunkterne. Det er en kommunal beslutning om et adressepunkt skal ændres/slettes. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser commented 2025-10-14 06:20:26 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,709 |
| 173251240 (Comments: 1) | Madorian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Adres compleet gemaakt commented 2025-10-14 06:07:28 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 170697573 (Comments: 2) | notalking (Discussed changesets: 1) | бляха муха, а я везде его использовал.. т.к. он предлагается, а не нерегулируемый... спасибо за замечание. commented 2025-10-14 06:03:32 UTC by notalking ♦1 |
| 173250925 (Comments: 1) | finnamon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Lijkt me oke. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-14 06:01:52 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173249595 (Comments: 1) | Bluedev93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-14 05:59:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173246682 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Verheijen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-14 05:58:19 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173020869 (Comments: 1) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 38) | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZvXZgPG9Jo można z tego skorzystać też. commented 2025-10-14 05:55:49 UTC by tomzyl ♦37 |
| 173216506 (Comments: 1) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 170) | https://www.assens.dk/om-os/nyt-fra-assens-kommune/nyheder-og-pressemeddelelser/forvent-laengere-rejsetid-ved-glamsbjerg-fra-mandag-den-3-marts commented 2025-10-14 05:54:08 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,709 |
| 163952369 (Comments: 1) | Bocian999 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229982414 - Lidl planowany (tak jak to opisałeś), czy w budowie, co wynika z landuse=construction? commented 2025-10-14 05:51:16 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173226525 (Comments: 3) | Hans Henrik Krohn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Præcis. commented 2025-10-14 05:40:12 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,709 |
| 173090272 (Comments: 3) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, noted on your remarks on placement tags. We will communicate your request to the project managers. Thank you for making the corrections here. commented 2025-10-14 05:35:08 UTC by Byenin ♦36 |
| 173090977 (Comments: 3) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, noted on your remarks on placement tags. We will communicate your request to the project managers. Thank you for making the corrections here. commented 2025-10-14 05:34:02 UTC by Byenin ♦36 |
| 173084254 (Comments: 3) | Shel_Sri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Mappin' Jack Flash, I have made the edit thinking that combining the two nodes would enhance routing and eliminate additional voice instructions by apps using OSM data for navigation, unless the small offset was due to a precise micromapp... commented 2025-10-14 05:27:29 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦5 |
| 173049776 (Comments: 3) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, noted on your remarks on placement tags. We will communicate your request to the project managers. Thank you for making the corrections here, also in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173090977 and https://www.opens... commented 2025-10-14 05:27:17 UTC by Tinetto ♦6 |
| 171177700 (Comments: 5) | hejmichel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also es sah aus wie Kohle. Richtig bestätigen kann ich es auch nicht. commented 2025-10-14 05:25:56 UTC by hejmichel ♦1 |
| 173234439 (Comments: 2) | hertipau (Discussed changesets: 5) | Das stimmt wohl, so steht es auf ihrer Internetseite. Aber vor Ort stellt sich das so da, dass die Apotheke sich in Hausnummer 383 befindet, und rechts daneben ein weiteres Ladenlokal auf Hausnumer 381. Laut ALKIS sind das zwei getrennte Gebäude... commented 2025-10-14 05:11:30 UTC by hertipau ♦4 |
| X | 173241739 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edits-to-name-tags-of-ecuador-relation/136829 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173255056 commented 2025-10-14 04:32:37 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 172983711 (Comments: 6) | MountSuckling (Discussed changesets: 7) | I have made the updates, have a nice day. commented 2025-10-14 04:25:32 UTC by MountSuckling ♦6 |
| 173206847 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo Saverin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good day. What sources are you using to add access tags here and in various other recent edits? If you have local knowledge or if you're using ground-level imagery of these places please mention this in your changesets. Legal access=desti... commented 2025-10-14 04:21:44 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦162 |
| 173254442 (Comments: 1) | brightj (Discussed changesets: 12) | And some cairns, since trail is hard to see under leaves in fall commented 2025-10-14 04:11:24 UTC by brightj ♦20 |
| 173233509 (Comments: 1) | DrFlexer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sehe ich das richtig das Du für die Bahnsteignummern den key ref verwendet hast? Statt ref müsste local_ ref verwendet werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public%20transport=stop%20position?uselang=de commented 2025-10-14 03:32:05 UTC by Kartibu ♦10 |
| 169831512 (Comments: 2) | NIWE1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Also, please square the buildings with the "Q" shortcut. commented 2025-10-14 03:23:02 UTC by Adam Franco ♦164 |
 | 173243186 (Comments: 1) | Atavoidirc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Atavoidirc, you changed the original Wikipedia article to a redirect link, i.e en:UTC−01:00 → en:UTC-01:00. Please review your edit. commented 2025-10-14 02:52:27 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦106 |
| 173248674 (Comments: 1) | edonasmajli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. The object you modified represents the park - by changing it to woods, you removed the park information. You should make a new one to represent the woods. Let me know if you have any questions ... commented 2025-10-14 02:13:54 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 173251247 (Comments: 1) | Fan7787 (Discussed changesets: 22) | if it isn't starting construction until 2032, it doesn't belong on OSM (yet) commented 2025-10-14 02:07:47 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 173251576 (Comments: 1) | marasigankayla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the footpritns you added here do not represent buildings, but rather 'roof furniture' like walls. Cross reference Bing to see the disparity beween the shadow length cast by the buildings and these features on the roof. Read my project c... commented 2025-10-14 01:56:24 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173245608 (Comments: 1) | filipbryyyyl (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-14 00:56:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173245121 (Comments: 1) | Judyta Filipiak (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173234729 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173235793 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:45 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173237545 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173249871 (Comments: 1) | kubzon7 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12121184912 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173206548 (Comments: 3) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 85) | Hey, for what it's worth thanks for trying I appreciate it! commented 2025-10-14 00:46:49 UTC by stevethomp ♦1 |
| 173251818 (Comments: 1) | Foxscotch (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is an uncomfortably large changeset, but there was literally no sidewalk info beforehand, and I had trouble deciding where to break it up. I just wanted to acknowledge that lol commented 2025-10-14 00:45:15 UTC by Foxscotch ♦1 |
| 173231555 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 181) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229992042 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:21 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173229578 (Comments: 1) | Patryk Piotrowski (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173223808 (Comments: 1) | sapphir (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173225248 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173251714 (Comments: 1) | Captain Cub (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed covered parking by River Hollow Road. commented 2025-10-14 00:38:48 UTC by Captain Cub ♦1 |
| 173195087 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello there, is there any reason you deleted that address node that was, from what I gathered, correct? In the meantime I have re-added the address node. Thank you. commented 2025-10-14 00:26:52 UTC by UnusualWorld ♦7 |
| 142526159 (Comments: 1) | epestone (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Climbing#Approach says: "The tag path=climbing_access should be used for paths dedicated to access climbing crags, not for general hiking." commented 2025-10-14 00:22:14 UTC by brightj ♦20 |
| X | 173240989 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Could you please not make large bounding boxes like this one? Please edit in only one country per edit. Thank you. commented 2025-10-13 23:57:21 UTC by UnusualWorld ♦7 |
| 173238285 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Chow (Discussed changesets: 1) | The lanudse here should not include building footprintsm and could be more accurate. Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features#Common_landuse_key_values_-_rural_and_agricultural_land for reference of exisiting tagging schemes. Please kee... commented 2025-10-13 23:56:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| X | 173250417 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse2 (Discussed changesets: 65) | What I had to do to edit the SR was to load the SR into iD by editing it from the website, then moving to https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/53.3102525/-1.8310127 where both stages 1 and 2 are. From stage 2 (which was a member of the SR) I could ... commented 2025-10-13 22:55:26 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦470 |
| 173227283 (Comments: 2) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 190) | Si, no hay problema commented 2025-10-13 22:49:34 UTC by AgusQui ♦606 |
| 173110354 (Comments: 4) | i2004 (Discussed changesets: 65) | Revertido. commented 2025-10-13 22:45:53 UTC by AgusQui ♦606 |
| 160117969 (Comments: 6) | mavOsaure (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merci de ta proposition: ça parait une bonne solution en attendant qu'un contributeur hypermotivé mappe le parking souterrain complet! commented 2025-10-13 22:20:24 UTC by mavOsaure ♦40 |
| 173086752 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | Ceci n 'est pas le nom de l'agence. Merci de ne pas transformer OSM pour plaire à vos clients. La réalité sur le terrain prévaut. Operator=Yannick Guillaume, peut-être. commented 2025-10-13 21:56:25 UTC by trial ♦944 |
 | 172910124 (Comments: 3) | Arber V (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for confirming this highway is open. I’ll remove the access=no tag. commented 2025-10-13 21:53:40 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦16 |
| 173248741 (Comments: 1) | AkinBZH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci pour l'ajout, mais l'entreprise N'est PAS sur le pas de porte. Vous confondez l'adresse (qui est à la bonne place) et l'entrepise (qui est dans le bâtiment). commented 2025-10-13 21:48:04 UTC by trial ♦944 |
| 173246187 (Comments: 1) | Philet2137 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173249071 commented 2025-10-13 21:43:58 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
| 172723942 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Skala bzdurnych edycji jest tak duża, że chyba można hurtem wycofać je wszystkie bez weryfikacji. commented 2025-10-13 21:36:08 UTC by uprkos ♦56 |
| 173232947 (Comments: 1) | TBonanno (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao TBonanno, addr:city e addr:postcode andrebbero usati insieme a addr:street e addr:housenumber per formare un indirizzo completo; ma gli indirizzi si usano laddove ha senso, cioè sugli ingressi a edifici o proprietà nel punto dove &... commented 2025-10-13 21:36:07 UTC by totera ♦302 |
| 143334997 (Comments: 1) | ShakyIsles (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi ShakyIsles, in this changeset you named way 7632531 "Park Edge Terrace". Do you remember what the source reference was for this? Thanks commented 2025-10-13 21:34:47 UTC by CoyKoi ♦231 |
| 147152323 (Comments: 3) | GBF-Faschina-Damüls (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh nein, die Nachricht ist mir untergegangen. Ja, hast recht, im Bearbeiter-Tool fallen solche Fehler leider oft nicht auf und ich bemerke sie oft erst, wenn die Änderungen Online sind. Alles sehr zeitaufwendig, wenn dir was auffällt bitte ... commented 2025-10-13 21:30:26 UTC by GBF-Faschina-Damüls ♦1 |
| 173178639 (Comments: 1) | 5802499c (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Here you have a) removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182156241 although this object should probably represent a building and have a building tag, b) mapped 2 nested horse riding centres (https://www.openstreet... commented 2025-10-13 21:28:05 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦824 |
| 172933105 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Prawdopodobnie kolejne fikcyjne przystanki. commented 2025-10-13 21:27:22 UTC by uprkos ♦56 |
| 172975525 (Comments: 2) | dcskobuffs (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hello tuxnux, thanks for reaching out! These edits were made based on painted arrows visible in the cited Vantor Satellite Imagery dated 2025-09-30. Apple has an agreement with Vantor Hub (previously Maxar) to use their more recent imagery to edi... commented 2025-10-13 21:19:57 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦66 |
| 173248109 (Comments: 1) | gimbenson (Discussed changesets: 1) | 안녕하세요 gimbenson, 환영합니다! 귀하의 기여에 감사드립니다! 협력을 쉽게 하기 위해 다른 사람들이 귀하의 편집을 이해할 수 있도록 변경한 내용에 대한 짧은 설명을 추가하는 것이 ... commented 2025-10-13 21:16:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 172993735 (Comments: 1) | Petró Tamás (Discussed changesets: 15) | Kedves Tamás! Valóban megszűnt, én jelentettem a kozkutak oldalán. Helyette van nem messze tőle egy új ivókút. Koordinátája: N47 33.122 E21 37.660 commented 2025-10-13 21:11:18 UTC by iTSiPoK ♦1 |
| 173154359 (Comments: 1) | AlwynWellington (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hello, You've removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863329639#map=20/51.3219246/-0.5583903 (which was part of a cycle route) here. Has that parallel cycleway really been removed? Must cyclists now either push their bikes on the pavement... commented 2025-10-13 20:40:11 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦470 |
| 173131856 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | Hallo mueschel Ich gehe davon aus, du hast die Diskusion gelesen. in diesem Fall ging es nicht um ownership=private sondern darum diesen Weg unsichtbar zu machen. Da der Weg eine Sackgasse ist, laut Eigentümer auch nicht sic... commented 2025-10-13 20:27:33 UTC by berndw ♦623 |
 | 173198000 (Comments: 1) | NxStep (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, What does https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4354750993 (“Parada, caballos” / “Horse transport”) stand for? This node was originally tagged with highway=bus_stop and was later changed to leisure=horse_riding. However, t... commented 2025-10-13 20:23:45 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦824 |
| 172768510 (Comments: 4) | Leporids (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-13 20:19:25 UTC by Leporids ♦1 |
| 173138783 (Comments: 2) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Thank you for the feedback. I will note this for future mapping. Please invalidate the task and it will be fixed and aligned. Thank you again! commented 2025-10-13 20:13:18 UTC by magneticred ♦1 |
| 173146249 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 425) | Ty jesteś największym szkodnikiem. commented 2025-10-13 20:12:31 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173198989 (Comments: 2) | Freeviv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, danke für den Hinweis, habe ich geändert. 😊 commented 2025-10-13 20:10:25 UTC by Freeviv ♦2 |
| 173224264 (Comments: 3) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Gracias a ti por responder. En OpenStreetMap no está permitido usar datos de guentes que no nos hayan dado permiso. Obviamente, no tenemos permiso de Google para copiar o usar sus datos. Tenemos permiso explícito para usar datos de algu... commented 2025-10-13 20:09:52 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,691 |
| 173245419 (Comments: 1) | mufasamufasa (Discussed changesets: 1) | excluir essa informação commented 2025-10-13 20:01:43 UTC by mufasamufasa ♦1 |
| 173211915 (Comments: 1) | Lavellan (Discussed changesets: 1) | нет, это не почтовые отделения commented 2025-10-13 19:56:27 UTC by literan ♦6,831 |
| 172372725 (Comments: 2) | bacon4streetmaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed everything that appears to be a duplicate --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172372725 commented 2025-10-13 19:56:10 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦116 |
| 171967447 (Comments: 1) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 174) | Hallo wermak, leider kann ich deine Änderungen im Ortsgebiet Stetten a.k.M. nicht nachvollziehen. Einzelne Gehwege wurden fast schon willkürlich entfernt. Außerdem wurden Gebäude, die vor mehr als einem Jahr abgebrannt ... commented 2025-10-13 19:49:57 UTC by flobo593 ♦3 |
| 172961278 (Comments: 5) | inechcomtv (Discussed changesets: 3) | حسنًا، فقط من فضلك، لا تُضِف كلمة "نسمة" إلى population، اكتب الرقم فقط. ولا تُضِف عدد السكان إلى population:date... فهذا الحقل مخصّص للتاريخ. commented 2025-10-13 19:47:45 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 173242258 (Comments: 1) | Narendran Thanikavel (Discussed changesets: 5) | what is "boom"? commented 2025-10-13 19:46:05 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 141469400 (Comments: 1) | k127 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hello k127, can you help at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5000322 commented 2025-10-13 19:38:21 UTC by FroschForscher ♦80 |
| 173223931 (Comments: 2) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola gracias. Lo tendré en cuenta. Un saludo. commented 2025-10-13 19:35:58 UTC by jorafa051194 ♦2 |
| 173149809 (Comments: 1) | Popelka94 (Discussed changesets: 1) | tagging von fahrradstraßen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes ich berichtige es. Grüße Langläufer --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... commented 2025-10-13 19:24:11 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,401 |
| 173003434 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Will you please stop mapping "abandoned" roads that have been demolished in reality, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436424183? That stuff is for OpenHistoricalMap, not our project. commented 2025-10-13 19:21:43 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 173231435 (Comments: 1) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola jorafa, Gracias por mejorar OSM, pero en este conjunto de datos hemos detectado que había añadido el nombre de un hotel y de una gasolinera en edificios. Esto ha sido incorrecto porque dicha información ya está... commented 2025-10-13 19:15:53 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,691 |
| 173183888 (Comments: 1) | Harzklub-BadGrund (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Harzklub. Willkommen bei OSM. Du hat ein paar ungereimtheiten hinterlassen. Wenn "freigegeben worden" wieso dann access=no? Wenn es wieder ein begehbarer Pfad (highway=path) ist dann muss abandoned:highway=path weg ... commented 2025-10-13 19:13:29 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,401 |
| 173242790 (Comments: 1) | charl3s (Discussed changesets: 193) | Mógłbyś bardziej konkretnie opisywać swoje zmiany? Patrz zasady: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 19:13:04 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 162771372 (Comments: 1) | J3ckV (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, could you share the source of those changes? I wonder if there's much change since 8 months ago. commented 2025-10-13 19:08:42 UTC by dzidek23 ♦62 |
| 172964652 (Comments: 1) | avenue2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | any chance you know (or can update) the trail visibility? I only see maybe a small section visible from satellite, and nothing obvious shows up on strava or 3dep. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2025-10-13 18:53:51 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦116 |
| 173063956 (Comments: 2) | VLD289 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi rskedgell, Thanks for reaching out! I have re-added the ref tags and will keep this feedback in mind going forward. -VLD289 commented 2025-10-13 18:48:33 UTC by VLD289 ♦1 |
| 173239259 (Comments: 1) | JeffPy (Discussed changesets: 1) | AFAIK, this mural no longer exists, because the building along which it had been painted, has been razed. This is very clearly stated in the object on the map, and in the changeset description. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4591422703<... commented 2025-10-13 18:43:06 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,573 |
| 173190976 (Comments: 2) | mkuentzl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke! Wird angepasst. commented 2025-10-13 18:37:00 UTC by mkuentzl ♦2 |
| 172883599 (Comments: 1) | beatpoet (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, I've removed amenity=pub from the Hoops Inn as it's still being refurbished, the tag should only be re-added once it officially reopens. The website says this will be in early 2026. commented 2025-10-13 18:23:45 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦94 |
| 171528518 (Comments: 1) | trailschneck (Discussed changesets: 57) | Eine Notiz hier sagt, dass man die Toiletten nicht löschen möge und auf der Website der Stadt ist hier auch eine öffentliche Toilette vorhanden. Was war der Anlass zur Löschung? commented 2025-10-13 18:17:55 UTC by dreua ♦121 |
| 136099452 (Comments: 4) | George S (Discussed changesets: 17) | This shows some of paths (I think the yellow dashed lines) https://www.adirondackrock.com/vol2_166-173.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqc8F7DtRSLmideaNEX_yq1DyoCgeKkEJthwhgXz1gIJ9FUhcGq commented 2025-10-13 18:13:34 UTC by George S ♦8 |
| 173236003 (Comments: 1) | FF Jaderberg_Wasserstellenwart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung: Die Wohnfläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441929537 liegt jetzt auf der Brachfläch... commented 2025-10-13 18:10:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
 | 172982942 (Comments: 3) | ParmaCanal (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Novelgomez, I reclassified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241478625 to path since residential and paths are normally for neighborhood roads, which is what these roads appear to be. Based on policy regarding secondaries (https://wiki.... commented 2025-10-13 18:02:47 UTC by ParmaCanal ♦2 |
| 170758161 (Comments: 5) | BibiOSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Si, effettivamente per le auto ha senso mettere privato. commented 2025-10-13 17:49:41 UTC by mtorchiano ♦3 |
| 114230476 (Comments: 1) | kook543 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej! Hur kom du fram till nya hastighetsgränser som skiljer sig från den skyltade? Kan klart ha hänt en del på fyra år men nu skiljer sig OSM från NJDB, och jag tänker att NJDB borde väl innehålla den... commented 2025-10-13 17:36:30 UTC by Hidoo00 ♦75 |
| 173212996 (Comments: 2) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 123) | oh cool, gute Idee, merci :) commented 2025-10-13 17:29:56 UTC by Piagno ♦109 |
| 165582779 (Comments: 2) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 143) | grazie per il check commented 2025-10-13 17:27:48 UTC by damianeue ♦114 |
| 173238801 (Comments: 1) | ـــــــــــــ (Discussed changesets: 1) | سلام، خوش آمدید و از مشارکت شما تشکر می کنیم! برای اینکه همکاری راحت تر شود و دیگران تغییرات شما را بهتر بفهمند، بهترین کار این است که ی... commented 2025-10-13 17:16:59 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 171069297 (Comments: 1) | RomanMinárik (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdravim, cyklocesta ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263243624 nie je na hradzi? Preco ste to po celej dlzke odstranili? Cyklocesta od rieky ku hradu uz bola zakreslena, pridanie paralelnej cesty ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425252... commented 2025-10-13 16:59:54 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
| 173225598 (Comments: 1) | Cebderby (Discussed changesets: 43) | I agree with you, not sure why user UtterCutter changed to Saint. Having driven this road it is definitely labelled St. Francis Farm. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 16:49:34 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦101 |
| 173204948 (Comments: 1) | guillemmal (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hola. Usar una frontera nacional como parte de un polígono natural ya me causa ruido, aunque no sé si necesariamente está mal, pero el tamaño de ese bare_rock no puede estar bien. Basta un simple "sobrevuelo" ... commented 2025-10-13 16:49:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 173231387 (Comments: 2) | Cebderby (Discussed changesets: 43) | I am entirely familiar with it. I suggest you read the page you link to, including the parts you don't agree with. eg paragraph 2 not just paragraph 1. commented 2025-10-13 16:46:57 UTC by Cebderby ♦304 |
| 156923786 (Comments: 1) | Mariho (Discussed changesets: 6) | Niet seasonal ? commented 2025-10-13 16:33:33 UTC by philippec ♦744 |
| 173116790 (Comments: 4) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 168) | Yes, I know. As I said in my previous comment: I removed those irrelevant tags again. commented 2025-10-13 16:27:39 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦453 |
| 173203435 (Comments: 1) | nitemoon (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello. I have reverted your edits because they were based on outdated aerial imagery sources. These buildings were part of a middle school that moved one block north. I've been to these sites in person, and you can verify these changes for yours... commented 2025-10-13 16:16:43 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 160489977 (Comments: 1) | Manojkumar Yerraguntla (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Just wondering why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344694712/history/1 and a few others are tagged as layer -1? Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-13 16:07:50 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,399 |
| 76773673 (Comments: 1) | Merzof (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi Merzof Any idea still why you added 5 79 Oxford Roads with different postcodes? Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-13 15:57:08 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,399 |
| 173232784 (Comments: 2) | deime (Discussed changesets: 2) | Typo.. Probeer op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Het is even zoeken soms. commented 2025-10-13 15:44:27 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173233945 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 391) | Adresse auf Migrolino-Gebäude aus https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/351_all.osm.zip :) commented 2025-10-13 15:31:17 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173216464 (Comments: 1) | FRANCESCA913 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. OpenStreetMap non e' il posto giusto dove inserire i propri percorsi. Ciao, Andrea commented 2025-10-13 15:26:15 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,456 |
| 160175955 (Comments: 3) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 21) | I have removed this footway because after going for a walk I found it is a private area. It is certainly artificial but its not intelligent. Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-13 15:25:23 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,399 |
| 159634256 (Comments: 1) | Sai_Dontukurti (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello I am puzzled as to why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338100284 is on layer -1? Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-13 15:18:15 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,399 |
| 164625242 (Comments: 1) | topius (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ciao topius In this changeset you've added the tagless way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375549660 I've seen this happen for myself with Go Map!!, too when (mis)clicking. I've remove the way in https://www.openstreetmap.... commented 2025-10-13 15:15:07 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 106277343 (Comments: 5) | uwe-shwbl (Discussed changesets: 17) | Perfekt. Vielen Dank. commented 2025-10-13 15:03:03 UTC by uwe-shwbl ♦22 |
| 172486209 (Comments: 2) | CaptainCarte (Discussed changesets: 37) | Well, the in/out Nodes could be tagged with inlet/outlet. I'm not really sure if it is a spillway in the first place or just a constant drain (altough the definitionbetween those are a bit flexible) commented 2025-10-13 14:54:56 UTC by CaptainCarte ♦16 |
| 166653871 (Comments: 3) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 53) | On the [chat](https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$17603452323692MDzkh:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=kde.org&via=matrix.domainepublic.net), people tended towards not treating this line differently than other pre-metro systems. ... commented 2025-10-13 14:49:48 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,260 |
| 173201265 (Comments: 2) | Kawsar Hosain (Discussed changesets: 5) | I left them a DM since there hasn't been any reaction yet --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173201265 commented 2025-10-13 14:47:21 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,639 |
| 173229337 (Comments: 1) | Reporter80 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Reporter. Voor de rendering van de namen kunnen de pois iets meer uit elkaar. Ik heb ze iets uit elkaar gezet. Denk nog wat meer. Up to you. Groet eggie commented 2025-10-13 14:41:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173125383 (Comments: 1) | manuei1994 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, du hast beim Badesteg der Therme angegeben, dass Boote dort festmachen können. Bist du dir da sicher? :) commented 2025-10-13 14:39:32 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,940 |
| 173230005 (Comments: 1) | mjayne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-13 14:34:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173227255 (Comments: 3) | deime (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay... merged! thx. commented 2025-10-13 14:33:02 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173162337 (Comments: 1) | guillemmal (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hola. Hay varios services e incluso unclassifieds acá que me dan la impresión de ser tracks. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173162337 ... commented 2025-10-13 14:29:38 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 173227350 (Comments: 1) | Chris Dekker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback: warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway \t Je pad heeft geen verbinding aan de zuidkant met het al bestaa... commented 2025-10-13 14:27:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173162983 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 155) | Le Parc confirme. Merci de la modification ! Comme je n'édite pas très souvent, j'en profite : on est géoparc mondial unesco également, depuis 2024. Est-ce qu'il y a une classe spécifique pour ajouter... commented 2025-10-13 14:26:16 UTC by Parc naturel régional Normandie-Maine ♦2 |
| 173230334 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 106) | * source=The Waltham Forest (Parking Places, Loading Places and Waiting, Loading and Stopping Restrictions) Order 2025 commented 2025-10-13 14:25:17 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 173230448 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 106) | * source=The Waltham Forest (Parking Places, Loading Places and Waiting, Loading and Stopping Restrictions) Order 2025 commented 2025-10-13 14:25:08 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
 | 173171663 (Comments: 3) | JohnW11 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Done! commented 2025-10-13 14:16:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 171051932 (Comments: 1) | loser1k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately barrier=yes isn't very effective for blocking routers as it is prottey vague, it nay be gate or a stile which are passable. After a survey I have updated them to barrier=fence. |
| 163979594 (Comments: 2) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Jo, du har vist ret. Der står at material=rock skal undgås. Det skal jeg prøve at huske. Tak skal du have. commented 2025-10-13 14:12:46 UTC by cyclist789 ♦37 |
| 173177273 (Comments: 1) | jamesks (Discussed changesets: 113) | Are you sure things like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441615066 are actual paths, and not just one Strava user’s dog walking route? commented 2025-10-13 14:10:28 UTC by gurglypipe ♦936 |
| 173188763 (Comments: 2) | aaei924 (Discussed changesets: 18) | 관심가져 주셔서 감사합니다. 주신 링크를 살펴보았사온데, 하시고자 하는 말씀이 무엇인지 조금 자세히 알려주셨으면 합니다. 이 바뀜집합의 내용과 관련이 있는 것인가요? commented 2025-10-13 13:58:30 UTC by aaei924 ♦27 |
| 173072489 (Comments: 3) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 339) | Dank voor de uitleg en de handige link! commented 2025-10-13 13:55:28 UTC by Acetamide ♦2 |
| 173227047 (Comments: 1) | inechcomtv (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't add "نسمة" to the population. Only the number. And population:date shouldn't be a duplicate of the population, it's actually the date at which the population was calculated. commented 2025-10-13 13:49:11 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 173136348 (Comments: 1) | Ben Schwarzmeier (Discussed changesets: 1) | 来旅游的是吧？谁叫你这么写了😅 commented 2025-10-13 13:45:26 UTC by Taksine ♦115 |
| 172622023 (Comments: 2) | moosieloosie (Discussed changesets: 1) | No response, so I've reinstated the woods that appear on imagery. commented 2025-10-13 13:31:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,941 |
| 173223286 (Comments: 1) | MR ROBIN DEFOE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you explain what your intention is with this tagging to an existing highway node, please? As such, it doesn't make any sense. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-10-13 13:28:48 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,941 |
| 158583697 (Comments: 3) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 79) | Obszar zabudowy zajmuje część dz. 44 (przy Chopina 119) oraz część dz. 49 (przy Świerkowej 12) - poprawione. commented 2025-10-13 13:25:29 UTC by cyganka ♦19 |
| 173226946 (Comments: 1) | CAT Degree College (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-13 13:09:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173224206 (Comments: 3) | Crewman182 (Discussed changesets: 2) | maybe I was wrong, after some browsing I found out the park seems to be new, the offices are gone and that indeed the location of the SAP office was off - I updated it to the correct building commented 2025-10-13 13:06:46 UTC by Crewman182 ♦2 |
| 173224766 (Comments: 3) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 4) | И адресът на Кам-маркет-а не може да е с №710Б(както беше). №170 е номерът на блока отсреща... commented 2025-10-13 13:06:09 UTC by Fraxi ♦155 |
| 173220292 (Comments: 1) | 8462368 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-13 13:00:18 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173220587 (Comments: 1) | 8462368 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-13 13:00:10 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172952843 (Comments: 1) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 104) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:59:12 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173220650 (Comments: 1) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 104) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:59:05 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173221291 (Comments: 1) | user_17585027 (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-13 12:58:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172746484 (Comments: 1) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:57:28 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173222275 (Comments: 1) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:57:05 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 152188757 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:54:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173168784 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:54:13 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173169413 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:54:03 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173176750 (Comments: 2) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:53:54 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 171963404 (Comments: 2) | Verkehrsgemeinschaft Mittelthüringen GmbH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Harald Hartmann. Dass ich diesen Eintrag in die Master-Relation gepackt habe, war mir gar nicht bewusst. Allerdings fährt die Linie 203 von Masserberg nach Suhl nicht am Wochenende, sondern montags bis freitags alle 2 Stunden. Ist m. E. al... commented 2025-10-13 12:49:23 UTC by Verkehrsgemeinschaft Mittelthüringen GmbH ♦1 |
| 167494309 (Comments: 1) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 19) | Salut Mathias, Pour les voie piétonne avec un panneau B54 le bicycle=designated est peut un peux trop fort. (circuler à l’allure du pas ce n'est pas ma définition de designated ) Que dirais tu de mettre un bicycl... commented 2025-10-13 12:40:54 UTC by simon_geovelo ♦91 |
| 173224060 (Comments: 1) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 111) | Частично върната https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173225616 commented 2025-10-13 12:36:02 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 172954715 (Comments: 2) | firefoxinspace (Discussed changesets: 32) | Die Ein-/Ausfädelung ist während der Hauptverkehrszeit mit Einschränkungen verbunden, sodass kein ungebremster Vorgang möglich ist. Die Fuß- und Radwege entlang der T-Kreuzungen sind auch nicht höhenfrei. Noch dazu gibt... commented 2025-10-13 12:30:21 UTC by firefoxinspace ♦31 |
| 172516265 (Comments: 1) | mmich31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Suite à cette modif pour remplacer Repetto par K-Way tu n'as pas supprimé les tags mineurs : website, description, horaires, etc... Je m'en occupe ;) Et la boutique n'a pas encore ouvert je crois commented 2025-10-13 12:29:50 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦40 |
| 173160789 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets. However, based on the Vantor satellite imagery (via Vantor Hub, dated 2025-10-06), and (Esri World Imagery), it is clear that vehicles are moving ... commented 2025-10-13 12:19:50 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 171985522 (Comments: 1) | DenchikBorovoy2011 (Discussed changesets: 6) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 12:19:09 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 173015409 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets and With no evidence of addition oneway tag . Added the roads using an old imagery (Bing) Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436497... commented 2025-10-13 12:19:00 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 173224600 (Comments: 1) | Digitalbti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-13 12:18:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173161060 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets with no evidence of the addition oneway tag. Modified the roads using old imagery (Bing) Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14364641... commented 2025-10-13 12:17:52 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 171906698 (Comments: 1) | mickleon (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 12:17:10 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 173161553 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets with no evidence of the addition oneway tag. And added other roads using old imagery (Bing) Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14415... commented 2025-10-13 12:17:05 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 165891373 (Comments: 7) | Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (Discussed changesets: 30) | Gerne. Beim November-Stammtisch bin ich wahrscheinlich nicht da (vorausgesetzt, der findet am 6.11. statt), aber den Dezember-Stammtisch würde ich mir dann einplanen. commented 2025-10-13 12:06:53 UTC by Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz ♦44 |
| 173172885 (Comments: 2) | cliveb (Discussed changesets: 7) | I’ve updated the tags. Thanks commented 2025-10-13 12:06:24 UTC by cliveb ♦3 |
 | 173222361 (Comments: 1) | Parons (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-13 12:03:48 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173220946 (Comments: 1) | Dueros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-13 12:03:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173222321 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Με ποιο σκεπτικό έγιναν οι αλλαγές σε highway=trunk; What is the justification for... commented 2025-10-13 11:51:52 UTC by PeachyOne ♦26 |
| 164256740 (Comments: 1) | andrea il greco bovina (Discussed changesets: 4) | rispetto a https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9150823#map=17/44.340509/11.378886&layers=N : da mia survey del 12 ottobre 2025, il tratto di sentiero tra il Ponte di via Zena (way 1363052136) e il bivio per la Torre dell'Erede (nodo 15597... commented 2025-10-13 11:51:03 UTC by Una tantum ♦19 |
| 173222705 (Comments: 1) | Haags Happie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi Haags Happie Je vraagt feedback. 'Paar kleine aanpassingen! ' zegt niemand iets. Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je doet. Bv betaalmogelijkheden aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-13 11:48:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173084980 (Comments: 2) | Maha Sharara (Discussed changesets: 1) | החזרתי את השינויים שעשית: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173223194 בבקשה תסביר מה ניסית לעשות לפני שאתה מנסה שוב, תודה commented 2025-10-13 11:48:04 UTC by NeatNit ♦35 |
| 171499207 (Comments: 8) | fmc_6 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ich danke dir! commented 2025-10-13 11:46:47 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦26 |
| 173217749 (Comments: 1) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi notabear, Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van nodes met alles dat er aan vast zit. Ook zijn je edits lastig te valideren. Beperk svp het gebied van je edits. Mapse, eggie commented 2025-10-13 11:44:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 65466087 (Comments: 1) | Tozzo (Discussed changesets: 20) | La way 127946696 non esiste, survey del 12 ottobre 2025, il castello si erge su un promontorio da quel lato, la strada dovrebbe andare in verticale arrampicandosi sulla parete rocciosa, ma proprio non esiste commented 2025-10-13 11:41:31 UTC by Una tantum ♦19 |
| 173221162 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Από που κι ως που ο δρόμος αυτός https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441856003 φαίνετ&alph... commented 2025-10-13 11:37:58 UTC by PeachyOne ♦26 |
| 173197829 (Comments: 2) | Map_HeRo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Du hast natürlich Recht, so ist das nix ;-). Schon verbessert, danke für den Hinweis. Gruß Mikke commented 2025-10-13 11:37:49 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦74 |
| 173199361 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | On i tak nie odpowiada na komentarze. Przywróciłem prawidłową nazwę. commented 2025-10-13 11:36:15 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173221780 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ποιά είναι η λογική που μετατράπηκε το https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484377971 σ&... commented 2025-10-13 11:32:07 UTC by PeachyOne ♦26 |
| 173107962 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Wycofałem zmiany. commented 2025-10-13 11:30:14 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
 | 173174511 (Comments: 1) | Guy Maurel KONAN (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please have alook on https://www.osm.org/node/13227504173. What is the mean of the tag CODE_ADRES = 00203? commented 2025-10-13 11:27:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 164439854 (Comments: 3) | David Jazbec (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ja, das stimmt, allerdings scheint es ein „neutraler/nicht religiöser Friedhof“ zu sein, ich habe religion=no gesetzt, place of worship passt commented 2025-10-13 11:23:24 UTC by FirefighterCGH ♦25 |
| X | 173114086 (Comments: 2) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 168) | Feel free to join them commented 2025-10-13 11:18:05 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦453 |
| 173138938 (Comments: 2) | Zack Bowden (Discussed changesets: 39) | Good point, thanks for catching me out on that, my bad :P :D commented 2025-10-13 11:16:54 UTC by Zack Bowden ♦6 |
| 172878665 (Comments: 1) | m_shevtsov (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 11:07:50 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 173023627 (Comments: 3) | mapfel (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für dein Verständnis! Dieser Changeset ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173221586 teilweise zurückgesetzt worden. commented 2025-10-13 11:07:27 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 172586101 (Comments: 1) | NordFisherman (Discussed changesets: 2) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 11:06:19 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 172873732 (Comments: 2) | ilias_ (Discussed changesets: 20) | Yes commented 2025-10-13 11:04:36 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 166740401 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 31) | Здравей Termininja, В Борисовата градина няма още 10 парка като way/1368130113. landuse=grass (или proposed;landuse=grass) би било по-правилно. Поздрави, Митко commented 2025-10-13 11:02:38 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 172975242 (Comments: 2) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 150) | Different systems may use different codes from ISO 3166 to refer to this object, hence I included them all. Codes from ISO 3166-3 are unusual but in the case of Metropolitan France, FXFR refers to a territory that still exists present-day rather than... commented 2025-10-13 10:53:47 UTC by JeroenvanderGun ♦184 |
| 173160720 (Comments: 1) | みむみむ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1441542590. What is the mean of the tag paera=yes? Please note that the key area is not used in the key building because it is already included in the term. commented 2025-10-13 10:46:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 165353044 (Comments: 1) | AlexisL_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour AlexisL_, La bande cyclable que tu as voulu cartographiée rue de la Girafe était déjà cartographiée (voir les attributs de la rue de la Girafe). Pour cartographier, il faut absolument se r&eacu... commented 2025-10-13 10:41:57 UTC by AlbaireN ♦21 |
| 173198128 (Comments: 1) | MistyPigeon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding this, and welcome to OSM! commented 2025-10-13 10:39:35 UTC by spiregrain ♦210 |
| 155825812 (Comments: 2) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 40) | Zurückgesetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173219783 Danke für dein Verständnis! commented 2025-10-13 10:34:23 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 173101789 (Comments: 1) | Byron Williams (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the entire Gulf of Saint-Malo has been marked as an islet, this seems incorrect, can you review it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12913145/history Cheers commented 2025-10-13 10:32:26 UTC by aTarom ♦815 |
| 172485213 (Comments: 2) | Own Oh (Discussed changesets: 52) | Yes, good point, thanks. commented 2025-10-13 10:15:00 UTC by Own Oh ♦23 |
| 171310094 (Comments: 3) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 40) | Zurückgesetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173218723 Danke für dein Verständnis! commented 2025-10-13 10:11:22 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 173215844 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 155) | Fixed in changeset 173218187 openstreetmap.org/changeset/173218187 commented 2025-10-13 09:57:51 UTC by TinPetreković ♦170 |
| 173217955 (Comments: 1) | مرکز تخصصی زیبایی دکتر هما شریفی (Discussed changesets: 1) | خیلی صبور تو مشاوره دادن و دلسوز هستین..مممنونم commented 2025-10-13 09:57:17 UTC by Arezoo momtaz ♦1 |
| 173218105 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 391) | Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4999141 erledigt, die im Changeset-Kommentar erwähnte Notiz ist hier ein copy-paste-Fehler... commented 2025-10-13 09:57:02 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173130886 (Comments: 1) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 24) | Pousuwaj bzdurne cudzysłowy z nazw osiedli. Być może coś zrobiłeś dobrze, więc nie chcę wycofywać całego zestawu zmian. commented 2025-10-13 09:52:21 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173216250 (Comments: 1) | Reporter80 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Reporter, Better create separate nodes. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-10-13 09:48:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173157200 (Comments: 2) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 24) | Z Osiedlem Na Wzgórzach tak samo. commented 2025-10-13 09:47:47 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173217081 (Comments: 1) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola jorafa051194, bienvenido y gracias por tu contribución. Para facilitar la colaboración y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que realizaste. Los co... commented 2025-10-13 09:46:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173190909 (Comments: 1) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 24) | W tym zestawie zmian usunąłeś istniejące wiaty przystankowe. Nie pierwszy raz usuwasz istniejące obiekty. Wycofałem. commented 2025-10-13 09:44:21 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 170120284 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 10) | Od 2010 r. polską nazwą miasta jest Iwano-Frankiwsk: https://www.gov.pl/web/ksng/55-posiedzenie-komisji-standaryzacji-nazw-geograficznych-poza-granicami-rp Nie wiem jak się ma zmiana nazwy w `name:pl` na Stanisławów (która... commented 2025-10-13 09:25:10 UTC by dzamper ♦152 |
| 173176180 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo Jasper, Ik zie dat jij hier een object dat je zelf hebt toegevoegd verwijderd en hebt vervangen door een nieuw object met identieke tags. Ik zie ook dat je dit meerdere keren hebt gedaan. Wat is hier de reden voor? Welke bronn... commented 2025-10-13 09:25:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172428490 (Comments: 5) | SWN-MP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, nachdem ich nun aus dem Urlaub zurück bin, melde mich mal wieder. Die Daten werden nur ein Mal die Woche (Donnerstag auf Freitag) übernommen. Dies wird mit der recht großen Datenmenge begründet (denke, das ist nachvo... commented 2025-10-13 09:24:37 UTC by SWN-MP ♦1 |
| 172929255 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Większość zmian tego użytkownika jest do wycofania, nanosi bzdury, a na komentarze nie odpowiada. commented 2025-10-13 09:22:27 UTC by uprkos ♦56 |
| 173145345 (Comments: 1) | rubynator (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Your changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 09:19:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,589 |
| 171212161 (Comments: 1) | Adventurize (Discussed changesets: 3) | 你编辑的毛病很多。为什么要这么画？ commented 2025-10-13 09:18:52 UTC by Taksine ♦115 |
| 130085542 (Comments: 1) | knoerk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Your changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 09:18:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,589 |
| 173146501 (Comments: 1) | knoerk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Your changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 09:18:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,589 |
| 173202439 (Comments: 1) | Tasmanian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Its best practice to "square the building" using the Q key in the ID editor. There is also brillian imagery here so please take the time to get the best outline that matches the building. commented 2025-10-13 09:17:40 UTC by tastrax ♦1,164 |
| 172646453 (Comments: 4) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | No, ja czytałem dokumentację odnośnie pasów skrętu i tak jak pisałeś jest prawidłowo, więc poprawiłem commented 2025-10-13 09:16:26 UTC by Feskil ♦27 |
| 173114636 (Comments: 2) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | Noo, właśnie nie wiedziałem czy traktować to jako rampę, czy jeszcze jako ulicę. Czy pas do skrętu nie liczy się jako druga jezdnia? commented 2025-10-13 09:15:12 UTC by Feskil ♦27 |
| 164466484 (Comments: 4) | Janeczek4567 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Także w EMUiA granica między Chróściną a Starym Grodkowem przebiega na północ od Osiedla Zacisze. Janeczek4567 nie odpowiada. Biorę się za poprawianie. commented 2025-10-13 09:15:09 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦398 |
| 172706492 (Comments: 4) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | Też jest B-1 prywatne postawiony commented 2025-10-13 09:14:03 UTC by Feskil ♦27 |
| 173213254 (Comments: 3) | Johan3822 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem... commented 2025-10-13 08:47:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173209929 (Comments: 3) | DeTimster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke... Bedankt voor je 'reply'. De tagging is van een ervaren mapper. Het is eigenlijk de Duitse manier van fietspaden taggen. Daar gelden andere regels, want op een cycleway mag je niet wandelen en ook niet paardrijden. bicycl... commented 2025-10-13 08:44:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173211601 (Comments: 1) | kasa kai (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167924592 commented 2025-10-13 08:43:11 UTC by kasa kai ♦26 |
| 167924592 (Comments: 1) | KUNGFUPAND (Discussed changesets: 4) | Changes modified and fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173211601 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173211521 commented 2025-10-13 08:41:39 UTC by kasa kai ♦26 |
| 167924783 (Comments: 1) | KUNGFUPAND (Discussed changesets: 4) | Changes modified and fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173213391 commented 2025-10-13 08:40:44 UTC by kasa kai ♦26 |
| 167925127 (Comments: 1) | KUNGFUPAND (Discussed changesets: 4) | Changes modified and fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173213908 commented 2025-10-13 08:40:01 UTC by kasa kai ♦26 |
| 173213908 (Comments: 1) | kasa kai (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167925127 commented 2025-10-13 08:39:35 UTC by kasa kai ♦26 |
| 173213391 (Comments: 1) | kasa kai (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167924783 commented 2025-10-13 08:39:04 UTC by kasa kai ♦26 |
| 173211521 (Comments: 1) | kasa kai (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173211521 commented 2025-10-13 08:38:21 UTC by kasa kai ♦26 |
| 172483580 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 304) | W materiałach na stronie kontraktu jest taka nazwa, np. tu: https://s7plonsk-czosnow.pl/galeria/zdjecia-z-ziemi-o2.html commented 2025-10-13 08:37:34 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦293 |
| 173197754 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hoi, review_requested \tyes De foutmelding is hier sports_centre in sports_centre. Meestal negeer ik het. Soms kan het niet anders. Een 'validator' wil wel altijd de sport zien. Zijn er meer sporten dan kun je sport=... commented 2025-10-13 08:35:02 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173129137 (Comments: 1) | Kamirol (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cześć, obszarom (osiedlom) takich domków nie dajemy nazw. Tym bardziej, że ta nazwa osiedla wynika raczej z nazwy ulicy, przy której domki zostały wybudowane a nie z tablicy z nazwą przy wjeździe na osiedle (wtedy bardziej pasuje ... commented 2025-10-13 08:26:27 UTC by Marek-M ♦943 |
| 173113838 (Comments: 1) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 52) | Kleiner Hinweis bezüglich URLs: Du hast hier das www entfernt. Die Website leitet aber auf www.dieci.ch weiter. URLs in OpenStreetMap sollten möglichst direkt und ohne Weiterleitungen sein. Insofern war die vorherige Version korrekt. commented 2025-10-13 08:24:37 UTC by Lezurex ♦227 |
| 173172511 (Comments: 1) | Rollon14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Rollon14, Peux-tu préciser comment est fermé le bunker ? SC a mis l'accès en NoExit, ce qui n'est pas accepté par Osmose car il existe une continuité de chemins. D'avance merci :... commented 2025-10-13 08:16:59 UTC by ZekOwney ♦20 |
 | 167198139 (Comments: 1) | natalia2005 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hola. no había revisado antes tu contribución. cuidado con la etiqueta 'name'. esta es para los nombres propios de los objetos, no para descripciones. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres commented 2025-10-13 08:13:23 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,903 |
| 173116628 (Comments: 1) | natalia2005 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hola y bienvenida a OSM. de qué se trata, este edificio? tiene una función que puedas explicar, así que lo ponemos correctamente en la base de datos. voy a mejorar su geometría. commented 2025-10-13 08:10:47 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,903 |
| 171512013 (Comments: 1) | qrisztly (Discussed changesets: 7) | Har slettet navn på cykelreparationsstation. Feltet er ikke til generiske beskrivelser. commented 2025-10-13 08:10:01 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦104 |
| 173185261 (Comments: 3) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173213064 commented 2025-10-13 08:01:33 UTC by Fraxi ♦155 |
| 173154189 (Comments: 1) | Simone_ilpollo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao Simone, I nome del strads tra I fonte e sul segna... https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/16/16tozw31jxb2sdwpmoy0z622v5id5pcjl-p637526392-full/1991fc3b5ae?width=3072&height=2304&crop=false&q=70 Buona Mappatura commented 2025-10-13 07:54:59 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,448 |
| 172610704 (Comments: 2) | Siamor1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank je wel ik zal hem doornemen commented 2025-10-13 07:49:21 UTC by Siamor1 ♦1 |
| 173113438 (Comments: 1) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 119) | Thanks for the fix! commented 2025-10-13 07:48:22 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,260 |
| 173184995 (Comments: 2) | Martijn14 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-13 07:40:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173141355 (Comments: 1) | _pkal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je geeft aan dat er bij Scheidemakershof Kasseien liggen, Sett zie ook wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=sett?uselang=nl . Op deze locatie liggen geen kasseien maar BKK straatstenen, ik heb dit veranderd . Graag opletten bij een... commented 2025-10-13 07:38:47 UTC by jaap de vries ♦666 |
| 173174945 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | I love free software but since anyone can just vandalize some of it, I rather support big tech in some cases. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 07:37:45 UTC by Anonymous36863 ♦3 |
| 173201446 (Comments: 1) | Johan3822 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-13 07:20:33 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173210449 (Comments: 1) | X_223- (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi X_223-, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 building(s) Could you please confirm if these... commented 2025-10-13 07:03:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 171799189 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | I checked the history of the changed way, and it turns out that the street _does_ have a bus bay, and I used aerial imagery to determine which side(s) of it the bus bay is on. commented 2025-10-13 07:02:41 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 172994505 (Comments: 3) | AndySchulte (Discussed changesets: 116) | I have corrected that, thank you for pointing it out. commented 2025-10-13 07:01:05 UTC by AndySchulte ♦102 |
| 172836422 (Comments: 2) | Viima (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Your assumption is correct. Henceforth, I am going to use the "destination:display" key. Thank you for the suggestion. commented 2025-10-13 07:00:11 UTC by Viima ♦19 |
| 172543641 (Comments: 8) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Prinzipiell halte ich die Nutzung von ref:DE-RP in Analogie zu anderen Bundesländern für richtig und gut. Dass weitere Unterteilungen ebenfalls mit einem : abgegrenzt werden, ist leider tatsächlich Usus, wem auch immer wir das zu verda... commented 2025-10-13 06:54:57 UTC by limes11 ♦955 |
| 173205909 (Comments: 1) | Kevin_07-18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. These descriptions (and maybe more?) look like they are copied from Google. Please don't do that in the future - it's not compatible with OSM's license. Read more here: https://w... commented 2025-10-13 06:51:51 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 172924602 (Comments: 3) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Allora si reverta e basta? commented 2025-10-13 06:51:49 UTC by George Sears ♦70 |
| 173099035 (Comments: 2) | Gicorada (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, using Level0 I didn't realize the geographical size, my changesets usually are local commented 2025-10-13 06:49:38 UTC by Gicorada ♦5 |
| 173206191 (Comments: 1) | rubiniums (Discussed changesets: 5) | Way 128610567: Statt name=455 wäre ref=455 korrekt. commented 2025-10-13 06:48:02 UTC by martinst ♦333 |
| 172999682 (Comments: 6) | nona mostafa (Discussed changesets: 33) | Ok thanks commented 2025-10-13 06:35:53 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 173203382 (Comments: 1) | Onekinnygee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I must reverted your changeset, because the camera isn't on the street (it is left or right from the street) Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance for a better description of your object. commented 2025-10-13 06:31:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173200451 (Comments: 2) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 7) | Poprawiłem te kilka adresów. W jaki sposób można sprawdzić czy przed zatwierdzeniem zmian nie popełniło się jakichś błędów? commented 2025-10-13 06:19:25 UTC by Multidragon ♦5 |
| 171966055 (Comments: 1) | PaulB2412 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo PaulB2412, herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Ich wollte Dir den Hinweis geben, dass Du hier einen Rewe-Supermarkt neu hinzugefügt hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/no... commented 2025-10-13 06:03:09 UTC by hfs ♦67 |
| 173026882 (Comments: 22) | 쥰쥰쥰 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 앞서 말했듯 하늘에 떠있는 수많은 인공위성들의 위성 사진들은 검열 처리도 없이 상업적으로 잘만 판매되고 있는 상황이라 지도 하나 잡아봐야 어떻게 되지도 않습니다. 현실적으로 공개... commented 2025-10-13 06:02:40 UTC by rhtb0 ♦253 |
| 173208828 (Comments: 1) | Johnbeal_00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-13 06:00:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173207728 (Comments: 1) | opDavi1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1348096768. What is the mean of the tag guest_house=guest_house? (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:guest_house). commented 2025-10-13 05:43:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173208493 (Comments: 1) | 2moflovect (Discussed changesets: 1) | Почему их видно на определенном масштабе? Что нужно исправить? commented 2025-10-13 05:43:03 UTC by 2moflovect ♦1 |
| 173145696 (Comments: 2) | maferikotupi (Discussed changesets: 46) | je décale, c'est à côté commented 2025-10-13 05:40:05 UTC by maferikotupi ♦33 |
 | 173117284 (Comments: 3) | Magick93 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Short answer: Did you know https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm? commented 2025-10-13 05:24:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 154640056 (Comments: 2) | artos42 (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304799852/history - a tych? commented 2025-10-13 05:23:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 154607965 (Comments: 1) | artos42 (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304654266/history - czy są jakiekolwiek pozostałości w terenie tego obiektu? commented 2025-10-13 05:23:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173194940 (Comments: 1) | Jackie Webb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.. The AED is positioned within the garage outline. Which looks like it's not accessible to the public, as access+yes implies? Can you please correct your map position and tags to something logical? If not then... commented 2025-10-13 05:14:04 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,941 |
| 173205770 (Comments: 3) | 쥰쥰쥰 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 꼭 GPS를 기반으로만 편집하지 않습니다. gps는 보조 수단일 뿐입니다. commented 2025-10-13 05:06:48 UTC by rhtb0 ♦253 |
| 173204152 (Comments: 1) | 쥰쥰쥰 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 버스정류장 명칭은 지울 필요가 없어 보입니다. commented 2025-10-13 04:57:57 UTC by rhtb0 ♦253 |
| 158572761 (Comments: 1) | junyeah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Jun, I removed the ford tags, that were probably added by mistake. Cheers, Totor commented 2025-10-13 04:36:19 UTC by Totor ♦67 |
| 173199895 (Comments: 1) | stevethomp (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted this and several other changes on this course over the last 24 hours that violate rule #1 of golf course mapping: golf course areas (fairways, greens, roughs, tees, etc) should not intersect each other. The previous versions of these holes w... commented 2025-10-13 04:30:03 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
| 173146045 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 425) | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:My_little_brother_did_it commented 2025-10-13 04:07:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173026089 (Comments: 1) | Hans Thompson (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, the last change has made the building disappear from the map rendering. You might consider adding tags like building=hotel or tourism=hotel to see which will make it reappear. commented 2025-10-13 03:44:45 UTC by kevinp2 ♦21 |
| 173200752 (Comments: 1) | unyny (Discussed changesets: 521) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441722332<... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173200011 (Comments: 1) | Soczek2752 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173197608 (Comments: 1) | Mechowskyy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173204072 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 124) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2411952763 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:42 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173200263 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173200459 (Comments: 1) | Endres Pelka (Discussed changesets: 52) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256522636... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 172815608 (Comments: 1) | 130597 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is it a real place? commented 2025-10-13 03:07:50 UTC by warudo ♦1 |
| 173182273 (Comments: 1) | Henk Sufitrail (Discussed changesets: 1) | You changed the leisure=nature_reserve tag to natural=water tag. You flooded some parts of the city. :) I have reverted your incorrect changes. And please briefly describe what you did in your changeset comments. See: https://wiki.openstreetm... commented 2025-10-13 02:49:47 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172232293 (Comments: 1) | S-zation (Discussed changesets: 31) | If you are adding these as a result of notes, please close the notes. commented 2025-10-13 02:43:50 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,062 |
| 173204580 (Comments: 1) | David clv crro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi David clv crro, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your ... commented 2025-10-13 02:18:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 172467360 (Comments: 1) | RiiRiee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please, what is the meaning of these dense grids of footways and service roads? For example, here, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334960642 the ways you have added bear no resemblance to reality. It seems like you are adding these ways for some k... commented 2025-10-13 01:18:49 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦94 |
| 173156009 (Comments: 5) | wadenick (Discussed changesets: 5) | OK I _think_ I might have corrected the fairway / putting green relationship on hole 1 here. Would you let me know if I've got it right? I'm mapping another local course and ready to get those relationships right. commented 2025-10-12 23:58:30 UTC by wadenick ♦5 |
| 173202735 (Comments: 1) | wadenick (Discussed changesets: 5) | Paging @b-jazz ... I tried relationships on these four holes on a new course mapping mission here. I'm going to stop now until I hear if I've got the details right or not. commented 2025-10-12 23:50:10 UTC by wadenick ♦5 |
| 172628252 (Comments: 2) | deryağ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cevap yazmadığınız için değişikliğinizi geri aldım. Değişikliğiniz deneme amaçlı değil gerçek ise buradan cevap yazarak belirtebilirsiniz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202742 commented 2025-10-12 23:46:10 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172946958 (Comments: 2) | Antoine Feike (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202346 commented 2025-10-12 23:16:26 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 171505714 (Comments: 5) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 61) | Dzięki commented 2025-10-12 23:12:04 UTC by czebureks ♦118 |
| 173191199 (Comments: 1) | doğatekinnn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Farklı nesneleri(bazı binaları, bir mahalle etiketini, bir çeşmeyi) silmişsiniz. Değişikliğinizi gerçeğe aykırı olduğu için geri aldım. Bilginize. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202297 commented 2025-10-12 23:11:33 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
 | 151615430 (Comments: 1) | ljubop (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! It seems to me you have used "name" tags incorrectly in this change. This cemetery does not actually has a name. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things (section ... commented 2025-10-12 23:05:55 UTC by Self-Perfection ♦168 |
| 173169446 (Comments: 2) | leDespicable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202141 commented 2025-10-12 23:00:06 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 173167832 (Comments: 1) | X_223- (Discussed changesets: 5) | 节点“陈梓强刷新点”(13227328734)如何为旅游景点？ commented 2025-10-12 22:57:28 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦14 |
| 173197797 (Comments: 3) | Sim8081 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah okay, das macht das ganze natürlich noch einfacher. Danke. commented 2025-10-12 22:39:35 UTC by Sim8081 ♦1 |
| 165755768 (Comments: 2) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hi domiden, Was bedeutet die Quelle "Bayern ALKIS" in diesem changeset und diversen anderen? Die ALKIS Parzellarkarte ist nicht mit OSM kompatibel, und die anderen OpenData Angebote der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung sind es *n... commented 2025-10-12 22:31:53 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 165762014 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo domiden, du hast hier Gemarkungsgrenzen eingetragen, und dabei die Quelle Bayern ALKIS Verwaltungsgrenzen benutzt. Leider dürfen wir die OpenData Produkte aus Bayern momentan noch nicht verwenden. Dazu gibt es einen langen T... commented 2025-10-12 22:19:49 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦266 |
| 173170015 (Comments: 2) | Quasimodo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Bienson, und sogar von dir dankenswerterweise wieder angepasst. Ich war mir tatsächlich nicht ganz sicher bei der Aktion und habe wieder was gelernt. Danke! commented 2025-10-12 22:11:58 UTC by Quasimodo ♦4 |
| 172903200 (Comments: 3) | tagishsimon (Discussed changesets: 8) | "There should be only one railway=station element for each station (refer to One feature, one OSM element)". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26479890 https://dat... commented 2025-10-12 22:08:47 UTC by DaveF ♦1,586 |
| 173183335 (Comments: 1) | Paul Lundwall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines commented 2025-10-12 22:08:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 171481897 (Comments: 1) | Magar Sushma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines commented 2025-10-12 22:07:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173044016 (Comments: 3) | okainov (Discussed changesets: 4) | @okainov With all due respect, limiting it to “some part of Europe” is still far too broad. commented 2025-10-12 22:06:32 UTC by Ansofter ♦2 |
| 173177936 (Comments: 1) | LeoDelCarto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines commented 2025-10-12 22:06:23 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 172454690 (Comments: 1) | Andreea Tulvan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines commented 2025-10-12 22:04:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173200269 (Comments: 1) | gigi91 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also highway=cycleway ist nicht korrekt, da kein ausschließlicher Fahrradweg. Vom Süden bis https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9169908507 ist es definitv ein highway=service, da Zufahrtsweg zu den Garagen https://www.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-10-12 21:57:26 UTC by Bienson ♦331 |
| 168032329 (Comments: 2) | QuigleyJones (Discussed changesets: 15) | preconstruction, slated for demolition commented 2025-10-12 21:46:36 UTC by QuigleyJones ♦7 |
| 173164592 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please stop adding national roads (network=GR:national) that do not exist: the list of national roads are at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/National_Roads. The ring road relation that you added is not a national road, so I had to remove i... commented 2025-10-12 21:44:44 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 171303988 (Comments: 3) | kalot47 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Estos edificios están abiertos, lo que pasa que sin mucha actividad. Efectivamente pertenecen a la Generalitat Valenciana, pero esto no se debería reflejar en el "name". Más info: https://www.lavanguardia.com/loc... commented 2025-10-12 21:36:40 UTC by dmlls ♦10 |
| 171353245 (Comments: 2) | Almorca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Toda la razón. commented 2025-10-12 21:24:04 UTC by Almorca ♦9 |
| 143690544 (Comments: 1) | happymapper (Discussed changesets: 27) | I'd definitely suggest adding "designation=core_path" where relevant, as per https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/designation=core_path . commented 2025-10-12 21:22:34 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 171303833 (Comments: 1) | kalot47 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi @kalot47, did you perhaps delete this node accidentally? The "Fundación ELLIS Alicante" still exists and is located where the node was. commented 2025-10-12 21:18:17 UTC by dmlls ♦10 |
| 173198935 (Comments: 2) | Cybermanx (Discussed changesets: 4) | revert at https://osm.org/changeset/173200089 commented 2025-10-12 21:14:23 UTC by Cybermanx ♦7 |
 | 173094936 (Comments: 3) | Kraan46 (Discussed changesets: 21) | I mapped the footprint smaller than the roof, becasue the roof has a unique shape. I though this was due to it overhanging the walls. Perhaps you saw or considered something I had not. I placed the POI between the two groups of buildings I thi... commented 2025-10-12 21:08:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173139696 (Comments: 7) | Vl-Sher (Discussed changesets: 7) | И трек выложу, и тропу по нему нарисую. commented 2025-10-12 20:59:18 UTC by Vl-Sher ♦5 |
| 173145707 (Comments: 3) | uYerh (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't know what are presets in Osmand but you can add a cafe [amenity=cafe] + [kids_area=yes] if this is mainly a cafe with kids area. And if it's mainly a playroom for children, then [leisure=indoor_play]. commented 2025-10-12 20:55:59 UTC by maro21 ♦739 |
| 173196470 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! Thank you for your contributions! Naming streets in Bulgarian, without "ул." or "street" and quotation marks is the usual practice. See:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%... commented 2025-10-12 20:53:35 UTC by Fraxi ♦155 |
| 162292619 (Comments: 1) | HappyMapper2020 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've reverted these changes. Being drivable does not mean it is legally allowed. Those ways had a source:motor_vehicle tag referencing a local law that establishes their correct value. This law is still in effect, so, driving on them is still fo... commented 2025-10-12 20:27:33 UTC by ftrebien ♦171 |
| 173131477 (Comments: 4) | mapitero (Discussed changesets: 6) | No OSM, nós sempre mapeamos as restrições legais, mesmo quando os moradores locais desrespeitam a lei. Em fevereiro, o HappyMapper2020 mudou motor_vehicle=no para motor_vehicle=yes sem mudar source:motor_vehicle, gerando confus&a... commented 2025-10-12 20:24:21 UTC by ftrebien ♦171 |
| 173125721 (Comments: 2) | Hervé TUC (Discussed changesets: 33) | Salut Oui je m'amuse, je ne sais plus combien il y en avait quand j'ai commencé, mais aujourd'hui il en reste un petit million dans toute la France. J'avance, j'avance... commented 2025-10-12 20:23:16 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦40 |
| 172942394 (Comments: 3) | MatzeTh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung. Gemeint ist mit fire_hydrant:diameter ausschließlich die Nennweite der Zuleitung. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-12 20:23:08 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 172165368 (Comments: 5) | Kraan46 (Discussed changesets: 21) | I like to explain the why, but I will try to be as brief as possible in future. I comment on changesets sometimes, becasue they are more specific than tasks. You yourself have commented on others' changesets. Not everyone contributes via ... commented 2025-10-12 20:21:57 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173114874 (Comments: 2) | CALMAMED (Discussed changesets: 1) | Naprawione commented 2025-10-12 20:19:07 UTC by bartgron ♦281 |
 | 173198093 (Comments: 1) | Skywolf333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I also, merge the same village points together because they are referring to the same village with the name in Chinese or the name in Burese. Also, applied the location of the same village in Burese because they located in Myanmar. commented 2025-10-12 20:15:12 UTC by Skywolf333 ♦1 |
| 173160607 (Comments: 2) | davejruk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: Not sure what imagery you used, but ESRI World Imagery is the most current and shows both buildings. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2025-10-12 20:06:07 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 171390879 (Comments: 1) | מבני הנביאים (Discussed changesets: 3) | תודה על כל התוספות בישראל מסמנים שמורת טבע עם \t boundary=protected_area ואין צורך להוסיף leisure commented 2025-10-12 20:06:06 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
| 173192752 (Comments: 1) | DanieScarb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-12 19:46:21 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173194526 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-12 19:45:21 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173194087 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-12 19:45:05 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 172858683 (Comments: 3) | sandstorm (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4998830 mentions that there's no building being built on the western part. What do you make of this? commented 2025-10-12 19:31:06 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173195654 (Comments: 1) | Bąbel (Discussed changesets: 268) | Pytam po raz kolejny - dlaczego zdublowałeś adres Skalskiego 13? commented 2025-10-12 19:24:51 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173186082 (Comments: 1) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 3D打印, you are continuing to add Chinese script names in Indian-administered territory. Please use only name:zh fields for Chinese script. Thank you. commented 2025-10-12 19:23:22 UTC by Kautilya3 ♦40 |
| 173179881 (Comments: 1) | Stef-Cris (Discussed changesets: 4) | Salut. Pe langa ca nu pui comentariii la ce editezi pe harta si trebuie sa ne uitam ce faci, cu ce drept pui tu informatii despre adresa unui actor / personaj pubilc pe harta? I-ai cerut macar acordul? Asa ceva nu se pune pe nicio harta publica. Este... commented 2025-10-12 19:22:50 UTC by rarad74 ♦302 |
| 172878933 (Comments: 1) | Pfad-Finder (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ścieżką, którą usunąłeś (obecnie to linia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435710951) jeszcze 2 lata temu biegł szlak nordic walking, zdjęcie: https://mapa-turystyczna.pl/photo/133784/nearby zrobione w miejscu 52.3028014, 15.2680194... commented 2025-10-12 19:14:44 UTC by englu ♦192 |
 | 172856226 (Comments: 5) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 53) | The Geoportal is not accurate for Velebit in some cases. HGSS maps are the latest verified and published mountain maps in Croatia. Zoranićev vrh is the correct name; West Babin vrh is to the north. The HGSS map is the correct one in this case. |
| 173195065 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-12 18:51:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 172964672 (Comments: 1) | LukeDH (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ciao. I nomi delle cascine vanno nel tag place, e non sugli edifici. Ciao, Andrea --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172964672 commented 2025-10-12 18:49:03 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,456 |
| 173177030 (Comments: 2) | DenisKachinskiy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks I will update it commented 2025-10-12 18:46:56 UTC by DenisKachinskiy ♦1 |
| 173194101 (Comments: 2) | mtekla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, du som vet får gärna tagga om den. commented 2025-10-12 18:27:02 UTC by mtekla ♦2 |
| 173160886 (Comments: 1) | Fan7787 (Discussed changesets: 22) | I removed the La Pryor Bypass because I can't find any evidence of it existing. commented 2025-10-12 18:23:55 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 171559559 (Comments: 1) | seering4 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Moin, ist der Weg an der Kupfermühle vorbei tatsächlich zugangsbeschränkt? Hier führt die Wanderroute 16 der Aktivregion Alsterland vorbei. Wie kommen die Gäste zum Restaurant? Besten Dank für eine Antwort. ;-) commented 2025-10-12 18:20:47 UTC by wachsihh ♦1 |
| 167737692 (Comments: 2) | mystery2008 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Здравствуйте, нет конечно, я использовал этот тег, тк видел уже на карте такое обозначение схожей линии U в где-то в Карелии, и потому что э... commented 2025-10-12 18:10:48 UTC by mystery2008 ♦12 |
| 173168290 (Comments: 1) | NUR7813 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lütfen bir daha bu şekilde toplu silme işlemi yapmayın. Toplu düzenleme ve silme işlemleriyle ilgili kuralları buradan inceleyebilirsiniz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice commented 2025-10-12 17:42:14 UTC by TheGreenOne ♦6 |
| 173163856 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 13) | These aren't highway=service because they aren't for vehicle access, you can see the bollards and curbs on streetside. commented 2025-10-12 17:25:39 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 173098092 (Comments: 1) | Lukas48 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Ich habe einige Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen. ref und fire_hydrant:diameter In das Feld „ref“ kommt die Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewiesen ist. Die Zahl nach dem „H“ i... commented 2025-10-12 17:18:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 172587746 (Comments: 3) | EddyMoi56d74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola EddyMoi56d74. Muchas gracias por tu respuesta. Te comparto un enlace a la wiki de OpenStreetMap que documenta el uso correcto de las etiquetas que has modificado: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:population |
| 173191995 (Comments: 1) | Dogtopia of South Lafayette (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-12 17:12:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 28112915 (Comments: 1) | Suerlaenner (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bei Ramsbek ist der Bach den du als Eltmecke eingetragen hast in den offiziellen Karten Nord-Rhein-Westfahlens als Hannabecke eingetragen bis eben die Hannabecke mit der Eltmecke zusammenfließt. Hast du oben mit Eltmecke begonnen und bei dem Z... commented 2025-10-12 17:12:27 UTC by Kersti Nebelsiek ♦9 |
| 173171405 (Comments: 2) | EugeniyKH (Discussed changesets: 17) | Вижу, уже поменяли. Только часть там узковата, не пролезет авто commented 2025-10-12 17:11:13 UTC by EugeniyKH ♦13 |
| 173191943 (Comments: 1) | cielak42 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Szczegóły geometrii muszą poczekać na nowe zdjęcia lotnicze. commented 2025-10-12 17:08:54 UTC by cielak42 ♦26 |
| 173092165 (Comments: 2) | Kersti Nebelsiek (Discussed changesets: 9) | Der andere Name war auch in der Karte zu sehen, aber eben nur bis Etmecke und Hannabecke zusammengeflossen sind, dann steht zumindest in den offiziellen Karten die Hannabecke als Name. Ich hatte vermutet, daß da jemand oben an der Etmec... commented 2025-10-12 16:58:44 UTC by Kersti Nebelsiek ♦9 |
| 173184639 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 27) | Trzeba naprawdę być smutnym człowiekiem, żeby psuć dane OSM, zamiast zapytać społeczność, jak można rozwiązać problem w swojej aplikacji... commented 2025-10-12 16:50:27 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,148 |
| 53384781 (Comments: 1) | FreedSky (Discussed changesets: 58) | Freedsky, it has been a long time, but I am not sure where this border line is coming from. I think the border of Tsosib Sumgyil should be the same as that of China-India border here. Do you disagree? commented 2025-10-12 16:15:54 UTC by Kautilya3 ♦40 |
| 173130829 (Comments: 1) | f4phantom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merhaba. node/2071263560'un man_made=monitoring_station etiketini aeroway=aerodrome olarak değiştirmişsiniz. Hem havaalanı zaten mevcut(way/183771833) ve alanda aeroway=aerodrome etiketi bulunuyor. Hem de bir hava durumu istasyonu düğ&... commented 2025-10-12 16:11:42 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173101537 (Comments: 2) | seewäldler (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hallo! Ja, das fand ich auch komisch, aber das Feld ist so wie die anderen Häfler Spielplätze ausgeschildert. Ich glaube die Stadt hat da die gleichen Schilder für alles vom Sandkasten bis zum fussbaldfeldgrossen Bolzplatz für... commented 2025-10-12 15:55:02 UTC by seewäldler ♦175 |
| 173169930 (Comments: 1) | Jens Adamskie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, hierzu eine Anmerkung: In den Namen sollen allgemein bekannte Namen. Der Teil „12-40“ gehört nicht dazu. Nummern von Einheiten, Bestandteile von Funkrufkennungen etc. sollten in „ref“ aufgenommen werden. ... commented 2025-10-12 15:50:27 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173167682 (Comments: 1) | Jens Adamskie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich habe einige Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen. ref und fire_hydrant:diameter In das Feld „ref“ kommt die Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewie... commented 2025-10-12 15:47:02 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173185351 (Comments: 1) | earthpassenger01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi earthpassenger01, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow you... commented 2025-10-12 15:06:51 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173143276 (Comments: 7) | hossader (Discussed changesets: 3) | fajne linki, dzięki! commented 2025-10-12 15:02:40 UTC by MaciekMma ♦68 |
| 173150053 (Comments: 1) | YourLocalEnbyMapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | There seems to be an issue with the changeset, as I never intended to edit anything in the top part of it commented 2025-10-12 15:00:21 UTC by YourLocalEnbyMapper ♦1 |
| 172032966 (Comments: 13) | pat-lachute (Discussed changesets: 12) | @pat-lachute, Valhalla will be able to support this precision in a bit. Still, it'd be best if you edit those ways to be described by a handful of nodes. You can have a look at some roundabouts, they often only have the intersection nodes, so it... commented 2025-10-12 14:53:43 UTC by Nils Nolde ♦2 |
| 173178950 (Comments: 1) | Alexei-1984 (Discussed changesets: 6) | fixed or reverted many of the changes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173184789 commented 2025-10-12 14:44:37 UTC by yelisey90 ♦176 |
| 173183996 (Comments: 1) | frackture (Discussed changesets: 1) | merci de respecter les terrains privés pour toute question n'hésitez pas à me contacter par mail gardeanimaux83@gmail.com commented 2025-10-12 14:34:17 UTC by frackture ♦1 |
| 172449812 (Comments: 1) | Andreea Tulvan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for mapping. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. However, you incorrectly tagged a few buildings with a layer=-1. Layer is typically used when some things (like a bridge and a road) are on to... commented 2025-10-12 14:29:48 UTC by martien-176 ♦357 |
| 173130323 (Comments: 1) | f4phantom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merhaba. way/1411782047'de highway=construction duruyor, sadece construction=trunk etiketini silmişsiniz. Unuttunuz mu? Yoksa başka bir nedeni mi var? (Muhtemelen) way/90514110'i bölmüşsünüz. Fakat yolu bö... commented 2025-10-12 14:29:17 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173179770 (Comments: 1) | Finthus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-12 14:26:32 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173166802 (Comments: 4) | necator71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | That is beginners mistake from my part then, thank you for the instruction, and for removing duplicate roads commented 2025-10-12 14:21:29 UTC by necator71 ♦1 |
| 172446338 (Comments: 3) | NyxxHD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ergebnis der Diskussion im Forum: * BS Energy will sich den Gleisanschluss als mögliche Option für zukünftige Lieferungen von Brennmaterial zum HKW offenhalten. * Wenn es Hinweise gibt, dass da zumindest einmal jährlich ein... commented 2025-10-12 14:07:58 UTC by rohieb ♦115 |
| 173172940 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 27) | Dlaczego wciąż próbujesz to błędnie zmieniać? Zrozum, że jeśli masz jakąś swoją aplikację, to w niej musisz to obsłużyć, a nie psuć dane OSM. commented 2025-10-12 13:30:02 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,148 |
| 171349996 (Comments: 1) | Rove (Discussed changesets: 12) | Salve, ho notato che in questo gruppo di modifiche hai eliminato tutto un sentiero che parte dal Pian della Pecora e arriva al Passo Caldenno. Questo sentiero è stato creato con una ruspa circa 1 anno fa soprattutto per le Mountain bike ed &e... commented 2025-10-12 13:27:28 UTC by Aaaa002 ♦2 |
| 173166114 (Comments: 1) | nona mostafa (Discussed changesets: 33) | Your changes were reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173172484 commented 2025-10-12 13:23:22 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 173172484 (Comments: 1) | Younes_Agadir (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't get into an edit war with nona mostafa, the interchange is still into construction, so please stop removing the contruction tags. This video was published yesterday, and they're far from being done. https://www.youtube.com/w... commented 2025-10-12 13:22:52 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 171325043 (Comments: 1) | danielza (Discussed changesets: 7) | שלום דניאל רצתי שם לפני כמה ימים וראיתי שהסינגל הוא תערובת של סינגל פיראטי, דרכי עפר ועקבות מטושטשים של אופניים. לא שביל מסודר ולדעתי ... commented 2025-10-12 13:15:48 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
| 161256611 (Comments: 2) | 431c57 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Keine Ahnung. Scheint ein Fehler zu sein. Vllt. meinte isced.level? Dann wäre es aber „5“. Level=1 würde passen. Mausgerutscht im Drop-Down. Generell bin ich mir jetzt nach nochmaligem Nachlesen mit „amenity=c... commented 2025-10-12 13:06:47 UTC by 431c57 ♦17 |
| 173171501 (Comments: 1) | ladoga (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. In einer Relation hast du Straßen gleichen Namens zusammengefasst. Üblich ist dies für größere Straßen (Bundesstraße etc.) als &bdqu... commented 2025-10-12 13:03:47 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173031276 (Comments: 2) | Mikko-Pentti Einari Eronen (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173031421 commented 2025-10-12 12:53:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173031587 (Comments: 3) | roberthcohenmd (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173033108 commented 2025-10-12 12:51:22 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173034274 (Comments: 2) | Shaun Kiernan: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173050068 commented 2025-10-12 12:51:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173176290 (Comments: 2) | 2938476529387 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dziękuję, zmiany zostały wprowadzone! commented 2025-10-12 12:50:38 UTC by 2938476529387 ♦1 |
| 173037313 (Comments: 2) | Anh Ngữ BUD (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173179256 commented 2025-10-12 12:50:17 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173078652 (Comments: 2) | Youthful Images (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173093375 commented 2025-10-12 12:48:39 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173081450 (Comments: 2) | treeva01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173179074 commented 2025-10-12 12:48:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173085179 (Comments: 2) | pinkrabbitrestoration (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173095204 commented 2025-10-12 12:47:36 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173089834 (Comments: 2) | Ligaro Support (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173091377 commented 2025-10-12 12:46:38 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173103735 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Orlando - Apopka (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173111763 commented 2025-10-12 12:45:47 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173129184 (Comments: 2) | dogtopiaofstamford (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173178908 commented 2025-10-12 12:45:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173131257 (Comments: 2) | Anatoly Ripa (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173176304 commented 2025-10-12 12:44:36 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173173198 (Comments: 1) | Mario26mario (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-12 12:43:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| X | 173146962 (Comments: 2) | Juanin23 (Discussed changesets: 10) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178841 where the changeset comment is: Remove testdata commented 2025-10-12 12:43:51 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 173173103 (Comments: 1) | Mario26mario (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-12 12:43:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173146296 (Comments: 2) | Juanin23 (Discussed changesets: 10) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178820 where the changeset comment is: Remove testdata commented 2025-10-12 12:43:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| X | 173147147 (Comments: 2) | Juanin23 (Discussed changesets: 10) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178789 where the changeset comment is: Remove testdata commented 2025-10-12 12:43:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
 | 173171892 (Comments: 2) | Awara Rasool (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173178713 commented 2025-10-12 12:41:50 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173131054 (Comments: 1) | TheB1GLebowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1437089086. What is the mean of the tag Lowes Entrance @ 601 = Lowes Entrance @ 601 Lowes Entrance @ Rockford Street =\tLowes Entrance @ Rockford Street By the way: You draw ... commented 2025-10-12 12:41:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 172778613 (Comments: 2) | Artarkserks (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178566 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 12:38:56 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 173177922 (Comments: 1) | JPJ&C (Discussed changesets: 4) | Info samengevoegd met adresnode commented 2025-10-12 12:37:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173178374 (Comments: 1) | JPJ&C (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag JP Probeer svp op de adresnodes bij te taggen, eggie commented 2025-10-12 12:36:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173166243 (Comments: 1) | MOTYANCHIK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от Яндекса на использование его карт в целях уточнения других карт (например... commented 2025-10-12 12:36:13 UTC by Grass-snake ♦244 |
| 173177599 (Comments: 1) | JPJ&C (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag JP Poi op gebouw geplaatst. Wat is het adres? commented 2025-10-12 12:35:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173177130 (Comments: 1) | Hashley G (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please start reading my messages and use the correct tags!!! commented 2025-10-12 12:34:13 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173168812 (Comments: 1) | Konrad95 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wycofałem tę zmianę, a następnie przesłałem prawidłową: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173176589 Przepraszam za zamieszanie commented 2025-10-12 12:20:59 UTC by Konrad95 ♦8 |
| 173176138 (Comments: 2) | MapChris3000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Waar je nu 28-3 hebt geplaatst zijn alle verdere nummers 26. Het adres op pand 12-3 heb ik hersteld commented 2025-10-12 12:15:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173116358 (Comments: 4) | hangy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wer denkt sich sowas aus für eine öffentliche Ladestation? Diese Stecker passen in eine Menge Geräte die bei 36 Volt einfach in Rauch aufgehen würden... Einen gängigen Namen kann ich nicht finden. Die beiden kleinen st... commented 2025-10-12 12:13:58 UTC by mueschel ♦6,683 |
 | 151247638 (Comments: 1) | Rolex06 (Discussed changesets: 4) | duplicated, already there https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4201921589 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151247638 commented 2025-10-12 12:11:54 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,505 |
| 173176187 (Comments: 1) | MapChris3000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag MapChris Svp geen format van adressen veranderen. Het is import vanuit het Kadaster (BAG) en het werkt zoals het werkt in deze format. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-12 12:08:51 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173172218 (Comments: 1) | themi97 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi themi97, please use either highway=proposed + proposed=footway or proposed:highway=*, right now data consuers will treat these as actual footways, ignoring proposed=yes tag. Thanks! --- Published using... commented 2025-10-12 12:04:49 UTC by mos_next_door ♦23 |
| 173176902 (Comments: 1) | SOSOwner (Discussed changesets: 13) | And that's the Chelmsford Shuttles practically done! Took only 3 years for someone to actually update the routes... commented 2025-10-12 12:04:44 UTC by SOSOwner ♦13 |
| 173017026 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | I recommend that you do not map proposed bypasses in Greece that are not yet approved and ready for construction: we see a lot of proposals in the news, but many don't see the light of day. commented 2025-10-12 12:03:19 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 173118591 (Comments: 1) | declanmar (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1437037055. The building doesn't exists, but the shop exists? commented 2025-10-12 12:03:09 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173175416 (Comments: 2) | tijlhart2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building:part%3Dyes commented 2025-10-12 11:47:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173060073 (Comments: 2) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | I also wish that you do not map ways that have been demolished, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436727127. That is for OpenHistoricalMap, not for our project. commented 2025-10-12 11:36:07 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 173173433 (Comments: 1) | rdfrs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, I merged your info with the present addressnode. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-10-12 11:35:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173048475 (Comments: 3) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 386) | 'name:kmal' didn't exist until a few days ago and 'ref:kmal' was used a lot less than 'ref:KMAL'. commented 2025-10-12 11:34:43 UTC by mueschel ♦6,683 |
| 173174868 (Comments: 1) | Hashley G (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-12 11:32:44 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173110970 (Comments: 3) | CoBoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | You don’t need to send the document. If those names are visible for anyone passing by, that is okay. I suggest you add the names on the various buildings, if you want. Just make sure that if the name is different in French and Dutch,... commented 2025-10-12 11:18:24 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,573 |
| 173156118 (Comments: 2) | Liongrass (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Comino, Thank you for noticing. You're right, the business is closed and I meant to remove all tags. I will attempt again! commented 2025-10-12 11:11:19 UTC by Liongrass ♦13 |
| 172769407 (Comments: 1) | Sredoje (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ponovo smo ti izbrisali izmenu. Imao si dve blokade, samo trazimo da nam se javis, da se dogovorimo sto konstantno menjas ovo. Molim te nemoj bez konsultacija sa zajednicom. -- We reverted your change again. You already had 2 blockades, we just... commented 2025-10-12 11:04:55 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦314 |
| 171652417 (Comments: 3) | MDe (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you. Actually disused=yes is used for about 2/3 of the trenches in Germany, so that seems to be proper solution. The disused:XXX-scheme is more modern but aims mostly at situations where reactivation of objects is plausible. <... commented 2025-10-12 11:04:07 UTC by limes11 ♦955 |
| 173159147 (Comments: 2) | kelianor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо! Буду знать :) commented 2025-10-12 11:03:29 UTC by kelianor ♦1 |
| 147825743 (Comments: 2) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 122) | Oh sorry, da hab ich wohl was übersehen. commented 2025-10-12 11:02:18 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,401 |
| 173125409 (Comments: 2) | Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 176) | Ja, ich habe heute noch weitere Details erfasst und hätte die Note dann schließen können (jetzt erledigt). commented 2025-10-12 10:59:08 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,160 |
| 173079784 (Comments: 3) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 28) | Ik denk dat je POI's en gebouwen door elkaar haalt. Apps als Every Door en ook de iD-editor op OSM.org maken het bewerken laagdrempelig, maar maken het minder duidelijk wat je precies aan het doen bent. Bij de iD-editor zie je onderaan wel een l... commented 2025-10-12 10:58:24 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173170613 (Comments: 1) | pitfire (Discussed changesets: 39) | Text im Änderungssatz ist NONSENS Simple Bearbeitung Hinweis Nr. 5002025 & Erledigter Hinweis Nr. 5002024 :-( commented 2025-10-12 10:50:22 UTC by pitfire ♦693 |
| 172934414 (Comments: 2) | TimbyT (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features commented 2025-10-12 10:20:35 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 172929358 (Comments: 1) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19684976. What is the mean of the tags codigo_via = 5501 last_update = 2011-01-01 length = 1118 pr_final = 21+1118 pr_inicial = 0 ref:igac = 5501 ref:mt = 5501 tramo = ... commented 2025-10-12 10:13:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173171409 (Comments: 1) | MarkLammers21 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Dag Mark Zo kan het natuurlijk wel als duidelijk is dat het niet voor de fiets bedoeld is. Wellicht surface=grass ipv unpaved MVG eggie commented 2025-10-12 10:13:08 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 171289513 (Comments: 3) | UtterClutter (Discussed changesets: 30) | That looks better now, thanks: the building footprint is showing up. commented 2025-10-12 10:09:58 UTC by Paul Flo Williams ♦6 |
| 173171256 (Comments: 1) | Hashley G (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Hashley G, Please read our Wiki on how to "Verifying Existing Merchants". https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Verifying-Existing-Merchants Happy mapping, Edwin Comino https://btcmap.org/tagg... commented 2025-10-12 10:09:27 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 133139326 (Comments: 2) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 302) | The purple arrows are apparently used as part of a national network of loops. Make of that what you will. commented 2025-10-12 10:05:15 UTC by b-unicycling ♦252 |
| 173150074 (Comments: 2) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 27) | Zaraz to skoryguję, bo jeszcze oddany do użytku będzie BW 1920 04 commented 2025-10-12 10:00:05 UTC by Anas masuris ♦136 |
| 173163820 (Comments: 1) | Elya_Kozharina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Это Китай. Если вы не знаете точное китайское название, пожалуйста, не пишите его. Спасибо. commented 2025-10-12 09:53:43 UTC by Taksine ♦115 |
| 165607516 (Comments: 1) | Houderl (Discussed changesets: 5) | I am sorry. What? The road is in fact built there, if you are too lazy to go there yourself you may visit https://mapy.com/en/zakladni?x=12.8032058&y=49.4680972&z=15 to verify. Why would you out of nowhere just permanently delete the road I p... commented 2025-10-12 09:44:52 UTC by Histmy ♦1 |
| 172716338 (Comments: 3) | pb&je89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I do not recommend it either, but to access shops on the roadside, we must keep foot access. Thanks! commented 2025-10-12 09:42:10 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦429 |
| 173169798 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-12 09:21:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 172544403 (Comments: 1) | itsash88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | cześć, linii autobusowych nie dodaje się osobnymi liniami, tylko tworzy relację połączenia na istniejących liniach dróg. To wszystko jest do porawy commented 2025-10-12 09:12:35 UTC by grelus ♦162 |
| 172519400 (Comments: 1) | guidro88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | cześć, linii autobusowych nie dodaje się osobnymi liniami, tylko tworzy relację połączenia na istniejących liniach dróg. To wszystko jest do porawy commented 2025-10-12 09:12:05 UTC by grelus ♦162 |
| 173160860 (Comments: 1) | igorpashkov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2025-10-12 08:46:17 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173165440 (Comments: 4) | p321 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dank je. Jouw informatie en oplossing wordt gewaardeerd. commented 2025-10-12 07:35:49 UTC by p321 ♦2 |
| 172931430 (Comments: 2) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 28) | Dank voor de correctie. Was me niet bewust van dat ik die ook verwijderd had (was ook niet de bedoeling) maar zal er in de toekomst beter op letten commented 2025-10-12 07:26:46 UTC by kOSMofant ♦5 |
| 164274017 (Comments: 1) | DDD丶Samuel (Discussed changesets: 13) | 请不要将未开通的铁路站点标记为已建成开通，请妥善使用 [Lifecycle prefix](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) commented 2025-10-12 07:24:38 UTC by XD346 ♦31 |
| 173161982 (Comments: 4) | p321 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb 79 weer teruggezet. Dat nummer zou andersverdwenen zijn van de kaart. Bezetten hier twee bedrijven een zelfde nummer? Ik zal je nog een welkomstmail per PB sturen met handige tips en tricks. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-12 07:23:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173165612 (Comments: 1) | X_223- (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi X_223-, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 highway(s) - 1 waterway(s) Could you pleas... commented 2025-10-12 07:14:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173098665 (Comments: 1) | De C (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1436939832. What is the mean of the tag buiding:min = 4? Did you mean building:min_level? commented 2025-10-12 07:07:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173165280 (Comments: 1) | Viktor Sokyrko (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-12 07:00:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 172944281 (Comments: 6) | mtb_93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your useful tips. I'll try to do the best I can with the info I have. commented 2025-10-12 06:49:37 UTC by mtb_93 ♦1 |
| 173123572 (Comments: 1) | Hooza (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch commented 2025-10-12 06:48:09 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦26 |
| 173036129 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 106) | * USRNs, not UPRNs! commented 2025-10-12 06:32:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 173127006 (Comments: 1) | Brazzelli Roberto (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ciao Braz! In una relazione hiking, cioè per pedoni, il ruolo backward (e anche forward) non hanno senso. A meno che non ci siano dei tratti di strada dove i pedoni sono obbligati per legge a seguire una sola direzione! Ivo commented 2025-10-12 06:28:53 UTC by Jrachi ♦790 |
| 173153570 (Comments: 1) | JB932948 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The pub is already mapped as Way: Sussex Arms (311904776) and Relation: The Sussex Arms (8757463). Thus I've added your data to the building outline. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-10-12 06:24:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,941 |
| 173121817 (Comments: 3) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks so much! Our community has many of these issues. As a dispatcher, trying to help my neighbors fix them. Im only just learning but its making a real impact. commented 2025-10-12 06:02:42 UTC by Dispatch_Cloud ♦3 |
| 172815323 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Omaha-Millard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172852371 commented 2025-10-12 05:22:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,589 |
| 172821558 (Comments: 2) | Estellia Aesthetic (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172828580 commented 2025-10-12 05:21:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172828932 (Comments: 3) | Acre Wood Dental - Round Rock (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172856574 commented 2025-10-12 05:20:51 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172832713 (Comments: 2) | Jerzy Wycisk fizjoterapeuta (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163475 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:20:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172840676 (Comments: 2) | dogtopiaofoldbridge (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172856111 commented 2025-10-12 05:19:21 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172853514 (Comments: 2) | lunarequest (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172853559 commented 2025-10-12 05:19:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172888612 (Comments: 2) | usa_d4acpk8m (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173163454 commented 2025-10-12 05:17:58 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172888858 (Comments: 2) | usa_d4acpk8m (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173163448 commented 2025-10-12 05:17:22 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172913211 (Comments: 2) | Burnside Express Collision - Greenwood (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173163432 commented 2025-10-12 05:16:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172910872 (Comments: 1) | Fun Bags Cornhole Lounge (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163411 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:15:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172940077 (Comments: 2) | Fun Bags Cornhole Lounge (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163406 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:14:44 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172955360 (Comments: 2) | 4esthetics Lounge (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172992418 commented 2025-10-12 05:13:40 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
 | 172964799 (Comments: 2) | Supreme Car Rent (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172965518 commented 2025-10-12 05:13:13 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172981008 (Comments: 2) | medellino (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163369 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:12:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172985887 (Comments: 2) | Troy M Moore (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173017271 commented 2025-10-12 05:10:39 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172988377 (Comments: 2) | instituteofchildpsychology (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163334 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:09:57 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172989135 (Comments: 2) | TN Computer Medics (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173022160 commented 2025-10-12 05:09:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173010777 (Comments: 2) | Kyzar AC Repair Boynton Beach (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173020905 commented 2025-10-12 05:08:52 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173012058 (Comments: 2) | Kyzar AC Repair Port St Lucie (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173020864 commented 2025-10-12 05:08:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173026126 (Comments: 2) | SK Quality Roofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173033562 commented 2025-10-12 05:08:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173026317 (Comments: 2) | SK Quality Roofing- (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173033486 commented 2025-10-12 05:07:45 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173120501 (Comments: 3) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 16) | Long-term, seems this should be converted to the modern PTv2 schema to make it easier to work with, more widely consumable and follow current best practice, though as that's a major change to existing practice and should presumably be done in co... commented 2025-10-12 05:04:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦48 |
| 166876885 (Comments: 1) | MichaelSmith836213 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 不知来源如何，实际上 highway=residential 才是更常见的用法，具体参考如广州大学城、香港理工大学及欧洲各大学等的案例 commented 2025-10-12 04:55:43 UTC by Higashimado ♦3 |
| 173161802 (Comments: 1) | Mahian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mahian, Thank you for your contributions and welcome to OSM! Everything looks good with your edit and is of high quality. Since you are a new mapper I have a few resources if you need assistance with future edits. Resources ca... commented 2025-10-12 03:57:24 UTC by PcMouse1 ♦66 |
 | 173161359 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 19) | labubu commented 2025-10-12 02:44:13 UTC by Sharko_J ♦89 |
| 173029414 (Comments: 4) | JBeverley (Discussed changesets: 1) | The vast majority of buses stop at the location of the physical bus stop sign, which is where the bus stop should be marked on the map, and where passengers would be waiting. All of the stop_positions marked on the map that I've seen in the Denv... commented 2025-10-12 02:13:01 UTC by JBeverley ♦1 |
| 172261416 (Comments: 3) | anthaas (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks for your reply. Re imagery: Of course I think that there are inaccuracies when looking at the imagery used for mapping the footprints. I you view my changeset one of the buildings differs by a factor of two, though most are probably a ... commented 2025-10-12 02:00:54 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173155489 (Comments: 1) | njberks (Discussed changesets: 2) | RE: the area around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13205320063 When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fair... commented 2025-10-12 01:37:55 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
| 173160441 (Comments: 1) | skladasljkd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi skladasljkd, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your wor... commented 2025-10-12 01:27:21 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173159178 (Comments: 2) | SOSOwner (Discussed changesets: 13) | (Ignore the larger than normal changeset area. Some additional routes had modified operator tags. Roads mentioned in the changeset are in or around Beaulieu Park.) commented 2025-10-11 23:42:11 UTC by SOSOwner ♦13 |
 | 169433670 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 169435530 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169433707 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169428497 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169430748 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169433128 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169433533 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169320594 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169320530 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169320648 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169320673 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169376887 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169377183 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169377242 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 169320935 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169396270 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169428394 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169428409 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169178423 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169277256 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169178623 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 169085812 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168903429 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168903497 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168989177 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168990095 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168993882 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168993932 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168993968 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168994075 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168994315 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168864954 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168896881 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168896948 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168898828 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168897662 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168894891 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168898611 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168895032 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168895181 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168899083 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168898762 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168902943 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168898648 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168899055 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| X | 168864767 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173123813 (Comments: 2) | pppc (Discussed changesets: 1) | i don't saw this in map either by searching the chinese restaurant name or in web version commented 2025-10-11 23:30:15 UTC by pppc ♦1 |
| 168858995 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168859220 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858788 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858849 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858900 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858375 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857353 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857990 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168857249 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857254 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857338 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858472 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858287 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168826136 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168852719 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168852784 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168852815 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168853583 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168854184 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168854232 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168856321 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857039 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168857110 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168825650 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168825592 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168825524 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168819906 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168819769 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168819558 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168819359 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168818457 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168818408 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168818358 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168818323 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168816451 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168781891 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168781356 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168781189 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168781119 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168780436 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168779177 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168778868 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168778768 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168778373 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168778013 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168765253 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168765170 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764959 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764922 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764876 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764739 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764722 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764602 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168763130 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168722528 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168736800 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168737091 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168737729 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764556 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168763231 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168762612 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168762630 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168762740 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168762879 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168763000 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168581342 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168721696 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168604184 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168722290 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168581389 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168721472 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168603770 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168604295 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168721598 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168581228 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168649150 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168648801 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168648993 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168515256 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167434613 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167470238 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168581025 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167514365 (Comments: 3) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168561069 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168514681 (Comments: 2) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168560586 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168515525 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168515332 (Comments: 2) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167434160 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:13 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173156681 (Comments: 1) | Semillero LATAM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Si bien las casas están todas bien dibujadas aparentemente, hay unas uno metros delante de otras, varias están desalineadas. Para corregir eso puedes tirar una línea provisoria que conecte los frontis y las partes tr... commented 2025-10-11 22:53:34 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 173144980 (Comments: 1) | Paul Flo Williams (Discussed changesets: 7) | With thanks commented 2025-10-11 22:53:32 UTC by UtterClutter ♦36 |
| 160896603 (Comments: 2) | adas (Discussed changesets: 71) | Możesz rzucić okiem na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4860583? Nie znalazłem nigdzie takiej nazwy, commented 2025-10-11 22:34:50 UTC by uprkos ♦56 |
| 173157953 (Comments: 1) | SuborbitalPigeon (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173157953 commented 2025-10-11 22:31:15 UTC by SuborbitalPigeon ♦30 |
| 171068073 (Comments: 1) | RomanMinárik (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdravim, aky chodnik tu chybal? Napr. popri Kmetovej od krizovatky s Vinicky na sever ziadny chodnik nie je (aspon v 2/2025), je tam len cyklocesta. Odvtedy nejaky pristavali? Taktiez ta cyklocesta popri Dubikovej je velmi divna. Je fyzicky od... commented 2025-10-11 22:18:56 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
| 146358921 (Comments: 1) | slymarekivan (Discussed changesets: 30) | Zdravim, na mnohych miestach je tento cyklochodnik zdielany s schodcami, takze nebolo potrebne pridavat novu ciaru (kedze nie je fyzicky oddeleny od chodnika pre pesich). Stacilo zmenit vlastnosti povodneho chodnika. Opravil som. commented 2025-10-11 22:18:49 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
| 169858336 (Comments: 5) | c674a (Discussed changesets: 1) | La maggior parte dell'area è de-facto formata da parti di terra mista cemento (con il passare del tempo poi la vegetazione ha preso il sopravvento) in quanto sono stati demoliti parecchi edifici, per questo la ratio che avevo usato era qu... commented 2025-10-11 22:08:55 UTC by c674a ♦1 |
| 172896880 (Comments: 1) | dasha_polsha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Почему вы удалили трубопроводы? commented 2025-10-11 22:04:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,129 |
| 153401397 (Comments: 1) | RRIbarruri (Discussed changesets: 22) | Не может улица называться улица Весенняя. это не по-русски. commented 2025-10-11 21:58:53 UTC by Глеб ♦137 |
| 173081072 (Comments: 7) | Florian Reichartshausen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, eine Möglichkeit wäre vielleicht fire_hydrant:style =round. Das wäre das Gegenstück zu fire_hydrant:style=rectangle, was in München recht weit verbreitet ist. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-11 21:36:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 173014056 (Comments: 1) | Timo_G (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, frag am besten hier nach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117014611 Er wird sich wohl erinnern, wo diese Ladestation steht. VG commented 2025-10-11 21:33:53 UTC by limes11 ♦955 |
| 172893875 (Comments: 1) | WindOfHope (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Тут два монумента или это дубликат? commented 2025-10-11 21:30:53 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,129 |
| 173156557 (Comments: 1) | Graptemys (Discussed changesets: 19) | Found an article about it: https://www.chmafm.com/welcome/landmark-visitor-info-building-in-aulac-torn-down-by-dti-after-unanswered-enquiries-from-tantramar-2/ commented 2025-10-11 21:29:01 UTC by Graptemys ♦33 |
| 172966433 (Comments: 1) | nlogidzon68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Название Spal точно верное? https://osm.org/node/4346181057 commented 2025-10-11 21:28:32 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,129 |
| 172891542 (Comments: 1) | Nortaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Обратите внимание, что вы рисуете по старым снимкам Bing. Используйте более свежие снимки ESRI commented 2025-10-11 21:27:22 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,129 |
| 172984336 (Comments: 3) | TMomä (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tämä ja muut hyvät käytännöt mm. tuo aiemmin mainittu "don't map for the renderer" löytyvät täältä ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice commented 2025-10-11 21:26:37 UTC by houtari ♦52 |
| 173156261 (Comments: 1) | Deftax (Discussed changesets: 8) | Jeżeli chodzi o zagospodarowanie terenu, to będę usuwać "duży" obszar mieszkalny i zastępować go wieloma mniejszymi (tak jak powinno być), więc jeśli chodzi o ten duży obszar to przez następny ok. tydzień mogą tam być r&oacut... commented 2025-10-11 21:24:19 UTC by Deftax ♦4 |
| 169979576 (Comments: 1) | LordMadsen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi LordMadsen, danke für's eintragen. Eine Fußpflege ist doch aber kein Arzt? commented 2025-10-11 21:15:04 UTC by Polarbear ♦944 |
| 173077362 (Comments: 1) | TMomä (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mikähän rakennelma mahtaa olla kyseessä? Ilmakuva ja MML:n maastokartta antaisi viitteitä että olisi jokin muu kuin man_made=tar_kiln, eli tervahauta joksi tuo on nyt merkattu. commented 2025-10-11 21:14:20 UTC by houtari ♦52 |
| 172240828 (Comments: 1) | Marvin de Hont (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello, I would say you partially improved/updated the residential areas here by including buildings and residential areas in settlements, however a significant proportion of both residential areas includes water from the river which shouldn't ge... commented 2025-10-11 20:50:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173096301 (Comments: 2) | rlaracol (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hola rlaracol, hay muchos cercos que intersectan con casas, que en algunos casos probablemente no existen o son muros. Además en muchos casos el polígono no se corresponde con la forma de la casa. Saludos. commented 2025-10-11 20:43:39 UTC by jptolosa ♦214 |
| 173144775 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 608) | Tak to wygląda: https://polska-org.pl/11721898,foto.html Więcej betonu niż zieleni, więc nie park commented 2025-10-11 20:42:33 UTC by maro21 ♦739 |
| 173094581 (Comments: 1) | Kraan46 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Please consider the context, landuse, errosion, vegetation and other features when mapping residential areas. Here much of the Western part of the selltlment is flooded in the most recent imagery, either due to a high water level or river bank errosi... commented 2025-10-11 20:41:34 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 15928950 (Comments: 2) | pnorman (Discussed changesets: 12) | I don't have my 2013 photos on my current server, but my vague recollection is that's because the name was 169th Street. I re-checked with 2015 Mapillary images and the name is not 169th Place NE or 169th Street Northeast. I conside... commented 2025-10-11 20:40:34 UTC by pnorman ♦318 |
| 173132663 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | I didn't add this tag. commented 2025-10-11 20:38:06 UTC by mueschel ♦6,683 |
| 173121513 (Comments: 1) | OnlyAppleCanDo (Discussed changesets: 5) | 你好，南湾路大部为双向六车道道理，暂时达不到快速公路的标准。 commented 2025-10-11 20:34:26 UTC by LokNeko ♦14 |
| 173146287 (Comments: 1) | pixelpete (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1437155048 is probably just an arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163661282, not a riding center. commented 2025-10-11 20:30:44 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦824 |
| 169733887 (Comments: 2) | djoot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej, Jag var där och de sa att det går bra att betala kontant :). Kommer inte ihåg om jag gjorde det eller inte dock... Alla ställen som jag lagt till är efter personliga besök där jag har fråg... commented 2025-10-11 20:30:19 UTC by djoot ♦1 |
| 173143277 (Comments: 1) | hossader (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ta zmiana zduplikowala adresy. Dodales adres na budynkach, jednoczesnie pozostawiajac taki sma adres przed budynkiem. commented 2025-10-11 20:22:38 UTC by MaciekMma ♦68 |
 | 173139849 (Comments: 1) | Raudel Roque Rodríguez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-11 20:17:56 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173152309 (Comments: 2) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Now i read again an you segmented the wood part, not the park. Sorry. commented 2025-10-11 20:07:45 UTC by rarad74 ♦302 |
| 172716867 (Comments: 3) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | Oh and it would be fine to add the namespace to the other tags as well if we could be sure they referred to the razed feature and not a potential current feature tagged on the same entity. Namespacing `information` is safe since it's supposed to... commented 2025-10-11 19:58:50 UTC by quincylvania ♦65 |
| 173118970 (Comments: 2) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- ... commented 2025-10-11 19:43:25 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 173152760 (Comments: 1) | marekmich (Discussed changesets: 34) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13226531612 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-10-11 19:40:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173118825 (Comments: 1) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway for the definition of highway=tertiary. Edit reverted. I'll send you more info in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2025-10-11 19:35:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 173142954 (Comments: 1) | xKmiloSx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wycofano: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173152676 commented 2025-10-11 19:34:08 UTC by czebureks ♦118 |
| 173118294 (Comments: 1) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | LIDAR does show this as a road, though it could be overgrown. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173118294 commented 2025-10-11 19:32:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 173049793 (Comments: 2) | ycukor (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Belarus Згодна зь вікі, футпас пачаткова ўжо мае bicycle=yes. Чышчу ад бязсэнсоўнага :) commented 2025-10-11 19:31:03 UTC by ycukor ♦2 |
| 173109136 (Comments: 1) | Iwaskilled (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: flock devices should not be connected to ways, like sidewalks. I usually look for a poles shadow when adding things like this. I went ahead and unglued the device. --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-10-11 19:28:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 173151604 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 48) | I think this restriction was left over from the temporary closure of westbound Randolph Road in 2021-2022. I have on hand a track from 2025-08-02 that shows that I took the turn in question; I think that's sufficient evidence that it's no ... commented 2025-10-11 19:16:29 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦67 |
| 173148063 (Comments: 2) | mosaico (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh, Entschuldigung, ja natürlich, ich wollte den Siezenheimer Steg wieder sichtbar machen, nachdem der neue Steg heute eröffnet wurde. Dank.e. commented 2025-10-11 19:09:08 UTC by mosaico ♦2 |
| 137947007 (Comments: 8) | habi (Discussed changesets: 391) | Ich habe die Grenzen von Wohnoase Mos an den Rändern etwas angepasst siehe Karte und Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173147313. Falls ich noch etwas verbessern kann, sagt mir bitte Bescheid. Ich denke, hier bin ich jetzt soweit... commented 2025-10-11 18:55:59 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦16 |
| 173150946 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | scusatemi per il big changeset commented 2025-10-11 18:46:37 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦101 |
| 173145406 (Comments: 1) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi review_requested \tyes: This way it's okay. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine Greetz, eggie commented 2025-10-11 18:41:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 152889929 (Comments: 1) | Ashwini S Kumar (Discussed changesets: 7) | Building shapes far to big - 3x or 5x bigger than imagery. Please narrow shapes. commented 2025-10-11 18:40:40 UTC by miluethi ♦315 |
| 173126077 (Comments: 3) | Treinfan (Discussed changesets: 3) | I now have added names, sourcing wikipedia (easiest reference). For a few junctions I couldn't find a name, so I have removed those. commented 2025-10-11 18:33:13 UTC by Treinfan ♦1 |
| 171795003 (Comments: 1) | StrikeMind (Discussed changesets: 4) | goodbye sternberger 🫡🪦 commented 2025-10-11 18:27:32 UTC by JustSomeMapper ♦5 |
| 166114240 (Comments: 1) | Ali-K2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 多谢编辑。对于这种森林请用简单多边形，不要使用关系 commented 2025-10-11 18:24:20 UTC by EnumMapper ♦51 |
| 173137197 (Comments: 1) | Demir Berke Soltay (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-10-11 18:22:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173125334 (Comments: 1) | archer8472 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Archer, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small... commented 2025-10-11 18:19:04 UTC by Metzor ♦386 |
| 173118667 (Comments: 1) | Fan7787 (Discussed changesets: 22) | "future" but you have deleted a highway that currently exists. Can you explain this edit in more detail? commented 2025-10-11 18:18:27 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 172663022 (Comments: 2) | Neet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Geen idee wat de uiteindelijke situatie gaat worden, maar er gaan wel huizen gebouwd worden en dit hebben ze bestraat. commented 2025-10-11 18:13:14 UTC by Neet ♦1 |
| 172858095 (Comments: 2) | didier2020 (Discussed changesets: 60) | Ok forget it, apparently he has already started revetring... commented 2025-10-11 18:05:59 UTC by Bierphysik ♦91 |
| 173147172 (Comments: 2) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 123) | Kein Problem, war schnell gemacht :) commented 2025-10-11 18:00:43 UTC by Piagno ♦109 |
| 168226566 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 40) | Poprawiłem tagowanie, ale mam duże wątpliwości co do prawdziwości tych danych. Jakie jest źródło danych o przebiegu granicy? commented 2025-10-11 17:59:36 UTC by SpinOff ♦314 |
| 169572924 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 40) | Jakie jest źródło nazw "Krzemienie Karmelowe" i "Kartofel"? commented 2025-10-11 17:49:58 UTC by SpinOff ♦314 |
| 172244058 (Comments: 10) | GUFSZ (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ok dein Ton klingt immer noch "pissed" aber bitte. Und sorry, aber scheinbar hast du dir das CS hier keine Sekunde angesehen um mein Anliegen nachzuvollziehen. Aber bitte sehr. Von meiner Seite ist alles gesagt. commented 2025-10-11 17:45:24 UTC by Bierphysik ♦91 |
| 169919515 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 40) | Map_Rivers ma historię dodawania do mapy fikcyjnych rzeczy. Przy braku odpowiedzi od razu bym takie edycje wycofywał. commented 2025-10-11 17:41:49 UTC by SpinOff ♦314 |
| 173051489 (Comments: 1) | josh09dmello (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, something went wrong with this import. Did you read and obey the Import Guidelines? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines Regarding the tagging: - 'name:alt' should be 'alt_name' - "o... commented 2025-10-11 17:40:44 UTC by mueschel ♦6,683 |
| 172368159 (Comments: 1) | Smaug7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Smaug7, Welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. Because of our slightly unusual street names here in Utah, we have a specific page on the wiki about it (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions). Spe... commented 2025-10-11 17:37:11 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦47 |
| 171308388 (Comments: 1) | AUPA_EG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour l'AUPA. Vous avez fait une erreur, il n'y a pas de voie verte sur la route de Violesi (pas pour le moment en tout cas). commented 2025-10-11 17:32:52 UTC by Adava Pays d'Aix ♦14 |
| 173025710 (Comments: 3) | AndreaDp271 (Discussed changesets: 6) | hi, its a test for a proposal page commented 2025-10-11 17:31:23 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦131 |
| 173147729 (Comments: 1) | cpm01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Business is a: Thrift Shop for children's goods. Clothing, Toys, sports equipment Prams, etc Category Toy Store doesn't really fit Further Occupys 2 bays in strip mall & I am unable to... commented 2025-10-11 17:28:56 UTC by cpm01 ♦2 |
| 173144205 (Comments: 1) | cpm01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok a thing no Category I can find that fits. It's a business that is a fun play space for kids. has a website, ph#, & such info but under Category "Playground" no such information can be included.<... commented 2025-10-11 17:24:56 UTC by cpm01 ♦2 |
| 173147115 (Comments: 1) | Map-Contributor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Amazing thanks commented 2025-10-11 17:17:32 UTC by RushMM ♦3 |
| 170751548 (Comments: 1) | padvinder (Discussed changesets: 229) | Heb jij met deze changeset de gebouwen van Doggersvaart 2/4 weer ingetekend? Ik meen dat ik die al weggehaald had. Die gebouwen zijn dit voorjaar/afgelopen zomer gesloopt. commented 2025-10-11 17:16:59 UTC by Larshei ♦14 |
| 173147140 (Comments: 1) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Nog even opgezocht.. Bij fitness is de tag leisure=fitness_centre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre commented 2025-10-11 17:07:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 136389010 (Comments: 2) | Gianfilippo96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ops, ha perfettamente senso, in effetti. Mi spiace. commented 2025-10-11 16:55:53 UTC by Gianfilippo96 ♦1 |
| 173143120 (Comments: 6) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Oke.. in dat geval kun je de info op de gebouwomtrek overzetten naar adresnode 29 en die 29a haal je leeg. Daar stond die voetbalvereniging op. Evt pas je m aan leisure=fitness commented 2025-10-11 16:55:22 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173012418 (Comments: 3) | balka41 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay.. enjoy mapping. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-11 16:52:27 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173139694 (Comments: 1) | cykloabc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Prechod pre chodcov ste presunuli do budovy. Na značku shop treba použiť len dohodnuté kľúče inak to aplikácie nepoznajú. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bicycle Aj otvárací ča... commented 2025-10-11 16:50:33 UTC by Dodko ♦1,240 |
| 173116620 (Comments: 1) | Teevolve (Discussed changesets: 3) | I reverted this change as there were several problems with it. * You broke up the fairway on the first hole into two line strings and then combined them with a multipolygon. There isn't any reason to do this. It should remain as a single... commented 2025-10-11 16:49:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
 | 166726853 (Comments: 1) | WT Hundu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi WT Hundu. While mapping some waterways, I noticed very small residential areas in a larger residential area here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389490341/history#map=19/7.342733/9.705768 This is not usually correct. Then I noticed that they... commented 2025-10-11 16:38:09 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦15 |
| 161040770 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi you added a name and ref= to the road in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15678090/. There is a note saying this is wrong, can you take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4797669 commented 2025-10-11 16:04:17 UTC by cuzi ♦128 |
| 173141052 (Comments: 1) | Lobo69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-11 15:49:56 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173108752 (Comments: 1) | Davidos64bot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you change the Basic Fit from 24/7 to some made-up opening hours even though the tagged Panoramax image and even the link you added both show 24/7? commented 2025-10-11 15:42:39 UTC by sykul ♦64 |
| 173069345 (Comments: 4) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | access:conditional=no @ (2025 Oct 06-2025 Dec 19) toegevoegd commented 2025-10-11 15:33:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 144013573 (Comments: 1) | ReinerWermes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, nur zur Info: Öffnungszeiten werden in OSM mit Englischen Wochentages-Namen geschrieben. statt: "Di-Fr 09:30-18:00; Sa 08:00-14:00" muss es heißen "Tu-Fr 09:30-18:00; Sa 10:00-13:00". Der Fehler ist korr... commented 2025-10-11 15:15:55 UTC by jmsbert ♦164 |
| 173141071 (Comments: 1) | Lobo69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Lobo.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-11 15:06:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173140372 (Comments: 2) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Check! commented 2025-10-11 15:05:46 UTC by Rene1974 ♦7 |
| 173139247 (Comments: 1) | JuMi37 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for this, the changes look good. It is advised to upload changes separately. Per theme and/or per area. Next time, if you want to change a speed limit on one area, add the surface type elsewhere... commented 2025-10-11 15:05:02 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,573 |
| 173122228 (Comments: 1) | Rowe99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=toilets?uselang=en#Toilets_within_places For toilets within places, simply add toilets=yes, no need for a separate node. commented 2025-10-11 15:04:51 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 168849021 (Comments: 12) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Actually, looking at recent news, it seems to me the park-and-ride aspect/attractiveness is being diminished: e.g. https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%E6%B8%AF%E8%81%9E/article/20250828/s00002/1756317494666/%E6%B8%AF%E9%90%B5%E6%B3%8A%E8%BB%8... commented 2025-10-11 14:54:59 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦53 |
| 173089636 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | Please stop adding the operator to the name and housenumbers to street names. I'll revert this incorrect changeset. commented 2025-10-11 14:51:05 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173090890 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | This change adds POI information to a building. We tag POI's on addresses, which had already been done. I'll revert this change. Please stop making these kind of changes. commented 2025-10-11 14:48:38 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173082352 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | Please stop making these incorrect changes. commented 2025-10-11 14:47:14 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173138980 (Comments: 6) | JosM34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Accesstags toegevoegd conform NL:C1 commented 2025-10-11 14:45:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173081015 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | In this changeset the name is changed from the actual name to the operator, the housenumber is added to the addr:street-tag and the phone number is added double. I'll revert this incorrect changeset. commented 2025-10-11 14:45:42 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173091344 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | In this changeset the name is changed from the actual name to the operator and the phone number is added double. I'll revert this incorrect changeset. commented 2025-10-11 14:43:38 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173105150 (Comments: 4) | Francoisepro (Discussed changesets: 3) | See here: it could be correct/legit to add the footway=sidewalk tag here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Cycleway_and_footway_on_sidewalk commented 2025-10-11 14:29:02 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦429 |
| 173140111 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 114) | Corregida dirección. commented 2025-10-11 14:28:07 UTC by dcapillae ♦382 |
| 173139196 (Comments: 3) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | OP het gebouw... Je kunt die nodes gewoon naar elkaar toeschuiven en dus combineren. Editor iD plakt alles aan elkaar. commented 2025-10-11 14:27:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173137240 (Comments: 1) | Steinn Mortensen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej, hvis du mener der er fejl i adresserne, skal du rette henvendelse til Egedal kommune, kommunen er adresseansvarlig. Adressepunkterne bliver automatisk opdateret, så din ændring vil blive tilbageført. commented 2025-10-11 14:16:07 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,709 |
| 171436143 (Comments: 1) | Yod4z (Discussed changesets: 30) | Attention a la typo de l'exploitant "Enedis" :) commented 2025-10-11 14:12:56 UTC by jbcharron ♦120 |
| 172280827 (Comments: 1) | Jean-Pierre Rondeau (Discussed changesets: 38) | Bonjour, Je me permet de corriger une erreur que vous avez faites, une ligne électrique Enedis a été taggé à tort avec power=line de plus il est préférable de nommer le nom de l'exploitant sous... commented 2025-10-11 14:11:06 UTC by jbcharron ♦120 |
| X | 172968285 (Comments: 1) | Neethu P G (Discussed changesets: 361) | You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"?? commented 2025-10-11 14:08:08 UTC by InsertUser ♦460 |
| 112815029 (Comments: 4) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 95) | Sure, especially since the proper conditional speed is already on the following segment eastbound. commented 2025-10-11 14:02:12 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,184 |
| 173125319 (Comments: 10) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Top, dankjewel. Ik knutsel rustig verder. Mapcomplete had ik inderdaad al gebruikt voor de ondergrond van sportvelden. commented 2025-10-11 13:31:05 UTC by Rene1974 ♦7 |
| 173103694 (Comments: 1) | OnlySamBlyat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Просьба не херачить казахскую латиницу в name:en commented 2025-10-11 13:23:33 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦34 |
| 172332855 (Comments: 2) | imulle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Habi Der Polestar Hub in Bern wird geschlossen und wird in Zukunft am Standort Münsingen in der Aaretal Garage als Teil der Carplanet Gruppe neu aufgebaut. Die Umbau-Arbeiten beginnen in den nächsten Wochen. Gruess imulle commented 2025-10-11 12:58:36 UTC by imulle ♦1 |
| 173135568 (Comments: 1) | SQ9ATK (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinn... commented 2025-10-11 12:50:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 168023728 (Comments: 1) | itr_me (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12947604721 How come this, and many other street lights are marked operator=ESB Networks ? 1. I understand that the ESB sold off its street lighting business. 2. I understand that Dublin ... commented 2025-10-11 12:47:29 UTC by VictorIE ♦947 |
| 173073388 (Comments: 3) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ja ich hatte einige hinterlegt. Ich kümmere mich um alle, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173073478. commented 2025-10-11 12:47:07 UTC by stirps ♦5 |
| 169326709 (Comments: 1) | MrValicekNR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravim, po tej cyklotrase mozu chodit aj chodci a tuto informaciu ste stratili ked ste len zmenili footway na cycleway. Opravil som. commented 2025-10-11 12:45:13 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
| 173073478 (Comments: 2) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ich antworte hier auch mal stellvertretend auf deine anderen Kommentare: Bei den U-Turns hatte ich auch ein bisschen Bedenken; Die wo sich die Straßen zur Kreuzung hin splitten würde ich belassen, weil es einfach nicht Sinn ergibt, dort zu... commented 2025-10-11 12:44:27 UTC by stirps ♦5 |
| 173128273 (Comments: 3) | Lully (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, merci pour la confirmation. commented 2025-10-11 12:42:15 UTC by Syl ♦994 |
| 173023412 (Comments: 3) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, The conversations about this sort of mapping are still ongoing; it's definitely worth having a look in the forum. Cheers, Andy commented 2025-10-11 12:40:58 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173131919 (Comments: 2) | ItaliA1delSole (Discussed changesets: 10) | As the hectometer signs tell, this is carriageway q of the A2 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.47351063242101&lng=5.405032087436666&z=19.05258447839492&pKey=925815374868766&focus=photo&x=0.7189064769115833&y=0.4832... commented 2025-10-11 12:30:06 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173073454 (Comments: 1) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin, auch diese Turn restrictions sind unsinn IMHO. Das es keinen Sinn macht dort zu wenden - D'accord - Aber ich sehe nicht woran du das verbot ableitest. Es stehen dort keine Schilder. Flo commented 2025-10-11 12:25:51 UTC by flohoff ♦2,384 |
| 173094803 (Comments: 2) | Ligaro Support (Discussed changesets: 3) | amenity=office verwijderd commented 2025-10-11 12:16:53 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172902854 (Comments: 2) | ZenPhil (Discussed changesets: 26) | cheers Kits that's incredibly useful, will use that commented 2025-10-11 12:08:28 UTC by ZenPhil ♦24 |
| 171904080 (Comments: 4) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 47) | Aus diesem Grund wird eigentlich verlangt, dass solche systematischen Änderungen vorher diskutiert werden. Dann wären solchen Fehlerquellen vielleicht aufgefallen. Jetzt wurden über Monate teilweise viele Tausend Objekte am Tag bearbei... commented 2025-10-11 12:04:31 UTC by milet ♦93 |
| 173081080 (Comments: 3) | josterburg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dann werde ich das mal auf "residential" ändern. Da gibt es sicher keine Einigkeit im Wiki oder Forum drüber, aber "apartments" ist für mich eher ein größeres mehrstöckiges Miethaus (wie die Nummer 2... commented 2025-10-11 12:03:27 UTC by IngoWo ♦20 |
| 173081257 (Comments: 3) | josterburg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, das macht Sinn :-) . Schliesst aber nicht aus, dass das Haus in der Klopstockstraße eine weitere Hausnummer an dem anderen Eingang hat. Da würde ich die Nummer lieber nicht an das ganze Haus packen, sondern einen separaten Node fü... commented 2025-10-11 11:58:27 UTC by IngoWo ♦20 |
| 172930411 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 28) | Omschrijvingen zoals 'kringloopwinkel' horen niet in de name-tag. De name-tag is bedoeld voor de naam zelf, dus RataPlan. commented 2025-10-11 11:57:04 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173024878 (Comments: 2) | jfd553 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for fixing the issue. I recently mapped long ridges connecting a group of peaks named Mount Saskatchewan*. I tagged them with natural=ridge and name=Monts Saskatchewan ridges. I may have inadvertently copied/pasted these values onto a fe... commented 2025-10-11 11:56:14 UTC by jfd553 ♦60 |
| 173016779 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 28) | In deze wijziging wordt het adres van het kantoor van Sweco verkeerd veranderd. Dit gebouw is Soestdijkseweg Zuid 50. Het landhuis is De Holle Bilt 22. Ik heb het hersteld. commented 2025-10-11 11:49:46 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 172618917 (Comments: 4) | RogHell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vereinheitlichen dürfte wenig Sinn ergeben solange verschiedene Varianten völlig valides Tagging darstellen: Morgen wird es schon wieder jemand anders machen. Im Nachbarort ist es wieder gelöst. usw. Ein Auswerter kommt sowieso mit ver... commented 2025-10-11 11:47:03 UTC by milet ♦93 |
| 173132837 (Comments: 1) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 38) | Źródło: https://bip.lubuskie.pl/system/obj/59309_Zalaczniki_do_uchwaly_nr_374.5329.23_zm._uchwale_ws._nadania_numerow_drogom_powiatowym_i_gminnym.pdf commented 2025-10-11 11:45:37 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 173132747 (Comments: 1) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 38) | Źródło: https://bip.lubuskie.pl/system/obj/59309_Zalaczniki_do_uchwaly_nr_374.5329.23_zm._uchwale_ws._nadania_numerow_drogom_powiatowym_i_gminnym.pdf commented 2025-10-11 11:44:27 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 172957950 (Comments: 1) | OSM-Kreis-Viersen7 (Discussed changesets: 9) | NRW iDOP Bilder zeigen das neu gebaute Haus commented 2025-10-11 11:31:40 UTC by Znaika ♦121 |
| 172506260 (Comments: 2) | JScharf (Discussed changesets: 1) | The reason I did that is actually because it’s what we call the approach. It’s mowed at a shorter height than the fairways. commented 2025-10-11 11:31:35 UTC by JScharf ♦1 |
| 173104613 (Comments: 1) | ANTOIN33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Очень странное название пляжа. Это его официальное название? Есть таблички с таким названием на местности? commented 2025-10-11 11:10:21 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦188 |
| 171104758 (Comments: 8) | JimMartin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great work! The cycling route is mapped now. If you enjoy mapping, you can check out maproulette.org, with some nice challenges. commented 2025-10-11 11:08:38 UTC by the Sandinator ♦2 |
| 173125146 (Comments: 1) | tglubenov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравейте! Може да използвате и по-новите и добри снимки на МЗХ. Ето повече инфо: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/136356 commented 2025-10-11 11:00:12 UTC by Fraxi ♦155 |
| 173106118 (Comments: 1) | Boggedy (Discussed changesets: 44) | For info this broke a couple of relations - I've fixed the ones I've found in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173131453 commented 2025-10-11 10:57:34 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173051481 (Comments: 1) | se7q38 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin se7q38, warum werden denn diese Schnittpunkte benötigt? Gruß Roger Wilco commented 2025-10-11 10:37:00 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦760 |
| 173121093 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 190) | te agrege el nuevo recorrido de la 333 osea la nueva zona que va a pasar commented 2025-10-11 10:28:54 UTC by i2004 ♦161 |
| 171880449 (Comments: 2) | Box4ll (Discussed changesets: 1) | vielen Dank :) Ich versuche es besser nächtes Mal zu machen. commented 2025-10-11 10:19:38 UTC by AasOsloNorge ♦1 |
| 173065103 (Comments: 1) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 21) | и зачем вы это сделали? это торговый центр, значит земля используется для торговли commented 2025-10-11 10:17:27 UTC by literan ♦6,831 |
| 173129349 (Comments: 1) | Olixelo (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-11 10:00:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 172678315 (Comments: 3) | Cèparlà (Discussed changesets: 8) | Effectivement c'est en partie visible sur l'ortho 2022. L'aménagement est bien tordu, une fois en piste une fois en bande, une fois derrière le trottoir. Ça ne ressemble pas à un aménagement qualitati... commented 2025-10-11 09:59:37 UTC by Gonéo ♦238 |
| 173125239 (Comments: 1) | chiche (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравейте! Бихте могли да добавите таг за самия бизнес. commented 2025-10-11 09:56:59 UTC by Fraxi ♦155 |
| 161907218 (Comments: 3) | tbiondo (Discussed changesets: 1) | interessante, non lo sapevo commented 2025-10-11 09:53:05 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦101 |
| 171265474 (Comments: 3) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 89) | scusami commented 2025-10-11 09:52:04 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦101 |
| 173128902 (Comments: 1) | Kamirol (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-10-11 09:50:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173128843 (Comments: 1) | Taksine (Discussed changesets: 33) | 这两个POI不大准确，它们不是废墟，故进行修改。 commented 2025-10-11 09:46:13 UTC by Taksine ♦115 |
| 173066952 (Comments: 1) | Bobropiton (Discussed changesets: 61) | так это же deprecated тег https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=facility?uselang=ru commented 2025-10-11 09:41:37 UTC by literan ♦6,831 |
| 173065761 (Comments: 4) | TRWFacty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Módosításcsomag visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173127801 commented 2025-10-11 09:18:01 UTC by infeeeee ♦593 |
| 101907160 (Comments: 1) | cartomatto (Discussed changesets: 32) | Non mettere Rudere come valore del name. Non è un nome proprio. Altrimenti daremmo il nome panchina a tutte le panchine. Così pure ruins per building non va se guardi la wiki. Ho messo abandoned:building=yes commented 2025-10-11 09:13:00 UTC by canfe ♦1,136 |
| 173105576 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Nie zmieniaj tego, co jest dobrze wpisane. Numer przystanku jest wzięty z oficjalnych danych ZTP w Krakowie, to raz, a dwa, zgodnie z odpowiednimi przepisami przystanek po tej stronie ulicy musi być parzysty. Numer ref z czapy nie jest. commented 2025-10-11 08:50:40 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦37 |
| 173049358 (Comments: 2) | Jorge Valencia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, thank for the advice commented 2025-10-11 08:49:36 UTC by JorgeV ♦1 |
| 173065336 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436754424 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13205411757 I've changed the site to landuse=religious and the shrine to historic=wayside_shrine (unfortunately there isn't a better tag at... commented 2025-10-11 08:41:40 UTC by VictorIE ♦947 |
| 173124616 (Comments: 3) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 342) | Super :-) Jeg lavet en forespørgsel hvor jeg henviste til denne kryds og dig https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dynamiske-ruderanlaeg/136716 commented 2025-10-11 08:36:05 UTC by LarsBG ♦79 |
| 173122009 (Comments: 1) | Benecke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page: https://wi... commented 2025-10-11 08:33:39 UTC by Sandal man ♦395 |
| 173126056 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-11 08:30:56 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173124649 (Comments: 6) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | De foutmelding kwam omdat een verbindingsnode met de gebouwomtrekken ontbrak midden in het gebouw. Dat bestaat uit twee delen. Ik heb het aangepast. commented 2025-10-11 08:29:57 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173069643 (Comments: 2) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | access=conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 29-2025 Dec 19) toegevoegd Construction verwijderd. Na datum gaat de weg automatisch weer open. Svp geen construction taggen voor 'korte' periodes. De routering raakt anders zoek. MV... commented 2025-10-11 08:25:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173088279 (Comments: 3) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 96) | Wydawało mi się, że było napisane, że stosuje się to jako całościowy prefix we wszystkich tagach podobiektu, więc się nie upewniałem już w wiki. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. JOSM niestety nie pokazuje tego szablonu domyślnie. <... commented 2025-10-11 08:11:40 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦252 |
 | 172970189 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172970161 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172972069 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173024866 (Comments: 2) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969846 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172971995 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969750 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172971971 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172972522 (Comments: 4) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969324 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969547 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969637 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969417 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968970 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968547 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969281 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969263 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969237 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968879 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969011 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968996 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968802 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968782 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968690 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968622 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968524 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968429 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968257 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968449 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968274 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968355 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968097 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968112 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 172968156 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968190 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968499 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968309 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968038 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968002 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967939 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968055 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173115544 (Comments: 7) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Paar keer CTRL-F5 (cache leegmaken) om het effect te zien. commented 2025-10-11 07:57:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172967862 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967668 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967722 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967769 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967785 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967831 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967879 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967896 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967922 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967605 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967498 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967532 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967557 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967574 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967634 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167167295 (Comments: 3) | Honzaiky (Discussed changesets: 3) | Díky za upozornění a opravu. Asi jsem to opomněl přetagovat... 🤔 commented 2025-10-11 07:38:15 UTC by Honzaiky ♦3 |
| 173079290 (Comments: 1) | adrianbmw (Discussed changesets: 5) | There is no such element on the ground. commented 2025-10-11 07:34:12 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦15 |
| 173100804 (Comments: 1) | bitcoin chalchuapa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-11 07:01:09 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 150911474 (Comments: 2) | Layft Greater (Discussed changesets: 58) | Yes, these are residential. There are some categories vehicles that can access those streets TotG applies. commented 2025-10-11 06:55:41 UTC by Layft Greater ♦176 |
| 160474802 (Comments: 1) | Carlo Melito (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sarà un errore perché non mi pare ci sia un bar in mezzo alla strada ;) commented 2025-10-11 06:54:45 UTC by baprischka ♦29 |
| 173005407 (Comments: 2) | GatunLake (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá Pt873, obrigado por entrar em contato. Vou me ater às suas edições. Tradução automática Hi Pt873, thank you for reaching out, I will defer to your edits. commented 2025-10-11 06:49:55 UTC by GatunLake ♦2 |
| 133616306 (Comments: 3) | Gruemscheler (Discussed changesets: 3) | ich dachte an "to be continued" oder "to be checked". Bei der Variante continued, hätte ich mich gefragt, in welche Richtung überhaupt verlängert werden soll, da an beiden Enden die Wege bereits weitergezeichnet sin... commented 2025-10-11 06:45:39 UTC by Piagno ♦109 |
| 173099218 (Comments: 1) | Haags Happie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-11 06:44:44 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173121014 (Comments: 1) | ajyong (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please use the key highway for streets, not to repeat the information of addr:street. commented 2025-10-11 06:33:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173121139 (Comments: 1) | ajyong (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please do not add “building” to the plot if there is a building anywhere. Draw the individual buildings. commented 2025-10-11 06:24:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173114847 (Comments: 2) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Je edits om nog ens na te lopen.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173114847 commented 2025-10-11 06:20:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 125951444 (Comments: 1) | Vonter (Discussed changesets: 28) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092941900 this drain is not visible in aerials, is it underground ? or is it outdated info ? commented 2025-10-11 06:08:45 UTC by TheLNL ♦9 |
| 173070503 (Comments: 5) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | Het stukje fietspad tussen v Heeswijkstraat 81 87 moet wel oneway=no zijn, want anders is geen fietsroutering mogelijk. Dat zijstraatje komt uit op een doorgetrokken streep. Check mijn wijzigingen svp, maar als je iets weer wil veranderen nee... commented 2025-10-11 06:06:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 125248093 (Comments: 3) | urbalazs (Discussed changesets: 51) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-10-11 05:34:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173069538 (Comments: 2) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | reverted by changeset #173121562 commented 2025-10-11 05:21:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173070313 (Comments: 1) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | RR Hoe kom je van de Horst als fietser naar de Van Heeswijskstraat? Je komt een oneway=yes fietspad tegen. Hier klopt het e.e.a. niet. Ga eens op een fiets zitten in gedachten en probeer dat eens uit en kijk dan naar de tagging van de paden.... commented 2025-10-11 05:15:18 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 110884484 (Comments: 1) | maxerickson (Discussed changesets: 32) | Looks like the address 1207 is for the Post Office to the East, while 1189 is the Gas Station. commented 2025-10-11 05:14:55 UTC by Kovirii ♦37 |
| 173121308 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM6 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Good Changesat --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173121308 commented 2025-10-11 05:09:37 UTC by Kovirii ♦37 |
| 173102655 (Comments: 1) | Lost in Time and Space (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for adding this. It looks like you might have missed a digit on the phone number though. Can you double check and fix it? Thanks commented 2025-10-11 04:13:39 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦342 |
| 172898050 (Comments: 2) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 104) | "tagowanie jako wojewódzkiej na tym odcinku wystarczy" highway=secondary nie oznacza że to droga wojewódzka skąd ten pomysł? commented 2025-10-11 04:02:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 146091444 (Comments: 1) | atsialiak_lyft (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you for adding the roads and their names! :) commented 2025-10-11 04:00:06 UTC by Kovirii ♦37 |
| 141983019 (Comments: 3) | twz123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | sounds like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility with some extra tags would fit? Or maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office ? commented 2025-10-11 03:44:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173045181 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | The filter roads at 38.851669,21.336762 were removed because Esri World Imagery disproves its existence. What is the source for all those filter roads you've added? commented 2025-10-11 03:31:39 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 111666009 (Comments: 3) | AndersAndersson (Discussed changesets: 150) | thanks for answering! I asked for clarification as some other restaurants where I asked such question turned out to not stock wider supply of products, only some specialty food (so restaurant selling also say wine/jam of own production/etc). |
| 171194154 (Comments: 7) | nick-28 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Still, what is the point and meaning of house=residential ? what this tag adds? have you used it to note that this specific house is used for residential purposes? (rather than abandoned or repurposed) commented 2025-10-11 03:17:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173118199 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 543) | chodzi o skasowanie nieistniejącej lampy, nie łącznik commented 2025-10-11 03:05:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173118264 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 543) | prawdziwe źródło: Geoportal commented 2025-10-11 03:04:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 171700679 (Comments: 1) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please don't use roads as boundary members. This changeset connected a tunnel to the road that crosses it. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171700679<... commented 2025-10-11 03:04:29 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 173096578 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please, will you please stop adding junction layouts that do not exist in real life, like what you did at 38.413403,22.838091 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436929596? Please explain why are you continuing to add non-existent junction ... commented 2025-10-11 02:55:14 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 173078061 (Comments: 1) | Emilio L (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, please, don't delete a hotel node and add its info to the hotel building. The hotel is not only the building, it's the whole grounds. Tag the whole grounds as landuse=commercial, the building as building=hotel, and keep the info on the ... commented 2025-10-11 01:45:59 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 171429569 (Comments: 1) | Canyon Runner (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, Could you confirm where you got the shape for the park from? It looks like it came from the county tax parcels, which is an acceptable source, but I just want to confirm before adding it to the source tag. commented 2025-10-11 01:44:55 UTC by ZLima12 ♦262 |
| 173117413 (Comments: 1) | imadmajor (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, merci de ne pas ajouter des résidences en utilisant le tag tourism=apartment. Comme tu peux le lire sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=apartment, ce tag est en réalité pour les appartements à la l... commented 2025-10-11 01:43:59 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 173116934 (Comments: 1) | wordbird (Discussed changesets: 8) | (an attempt to correct relations / land cover not displaying in area) commented 2025-10-11 01:08:17 UTC by wordbird ♦9 |
| 172984985 (Comments: 2) | Dmitry747 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2025-10-11 00:45:23 UTC by Dmitry747 ♦1 |
| 168287495 (Comments: 1) | Brareu68 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Why did you move Big River Isuzu, Nissan and Toyota? commented 2025-10-11 00:45:08 UTC by digistrorf ♦6 |
| 171951141 (Comments: 1) | Carlos244 (Discussed changesets: 1) | bridges should not connect to roads they cross commented 2025-10-11 00:28:51 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 122841770 (Comments: 1) | slymarekivan (Discussed changesets: 30) | Zdravim. Ked mate vodu v tuneli pod zemou s layer=-1, nie su cesty nad nou mostami. A naozaj tam ta Jelsina tecie pod zemou? A ako moze mat dalsi pritok z pola s rovnakym nazvom? commented 2025-10-11 00:09:40 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
| 168223516 (Comments: 1) | David Kříž (Discussed changesets: 18) | Dakujem, chapem co ste tu chceli dosiahnut, ale len dokreslenim jednej cesty to nevyriesite. Bolo treba este spravne znizit spravne pocet jazdnych pruhov na ceste 513, z ktorej ste oddelili novy odbocovaci pruh (nestaci len zmenit na lanes=2, ... commented 2025-10-11 00:07:31 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
| 170698007 (Comments: 1) | sovereign_linhktg (Discussed changesets: 30) | Fake bridge --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170698007 commented 2025-10-10 23:51:18 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 171398116 (Comments: 2) | Arpit_agg (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173116544 commented 2025-10-10 23:44:48 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 173014245 (Comments: 1) | sakudo (Discussed changesets: 12) | Not a fix --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173014245 commented 2025-10-10 23:38:39 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 173027664 (Comments: 4) | Jman12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cool project. Thanks! By poking around I found also this one, but its data hasn't been updated in a year. https://osmcamera.dihe.de/ commented 2025-10-10 23:27:39 UTC by Mashin ♦576 |
| 173081379 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 263) | Dakujem, celkom dobre, len usek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436755528 nema mat 3 jazdne pruhy ale len 2, kedze odbocovaci pruh este nema plnu sirku. commented 2025-10-10 23:25:58 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
| 172984196 (Comments: 1) | Dmitry747 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Awesome, thanks for the edit! Based on aerial imagery, it looks like that 3rd lane is a center turn lane, like it is south of the segment you edited. I added some more tags to indicate a center lane, but let me know if that's not the case anymor... commented 2025-10-10 23:24:35 UTC by pwbriggs ♦76 |
| 173070480 (Comments: 1) | VeryFakeName (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Reverted for fake ... commented 2025-10-10 23:23:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 173068501 (Comments: 1) | ljhljh235 (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, if you switch to the ESRI World imagery, you can see one completed house and the construction of another. Just select the background icon in the editor and select the ESRI World imagery. --- Publishe... commented 2025-10-10 23:18:24 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 165128407 (Comments: 1) | Henten Človek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zdravim, preco je ten chodnik na moste tvoreny 5 usekmi, ked maju vsetky rovnake vlastnosti? Stacil by jeden. commented 2025-10-10 23:09:39 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
 | 100000000 (Comments: 134) | Lamine Ndiaye (Discussed changesets: 10) | close to 1 billion? commented 2025-10-10 23:02:49 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 1000000 (Comments: 5) | nin2jardin (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1m commented 2025-10-10 23:00:57 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 67 (Comments: 1) | zool (Discussed changesets: 6) | 67 commented 2025-10-10 22:59:49 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 172968840 (Comments: 1) | Geopublisher (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do you have more information about this? The road signs are "Tuna-Hästberg". The official mapping authority are also spelling it that way. commented 2025-10-10 22:59:27 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦616 |
| 69 (Comments: 6) | zool (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nice commented 2025-10-10 22:58:58 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 420 (Comments: 2) | Welshie (Discussed changesets: 84) | nice number commented 2025-10-10 22:58:14 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 171739146 (Comments: 1) | krzysztofedycje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jeśli ciągi piesze przecinają się z drogami, dajemy punkt na ich przecięciu. Nie nakładamy linii na siebie bez przecięć. Kolejna sprawa to przejście dla pieszych z wyspą, które było poprawnie naniesione. Na tym przejściu, rozdz... commented 2025-10-10 22:57:15 UTC by olo81 ♦687 |
| 173112701 (Comments: 1) | qumil (Discussed changesets: 61) | Nie wiem jak skomplikowana była ta przebudowa ale ta edycja wygląda na całkowicie błędną. Poprawiłem skrzyżowanie wg danych w BDOT, które wyglądają na podobne do Twojej edycji. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173115287... commented 2025-10-10 22:33:50 UTC by Marek-M ♦943 |
| 170131844 (Comments: 2) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 85) | Thanks for letting me know! commented 2025-10-10 22:15:57 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
| 173112030 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-10 21:42:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173110893 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-10 21:42:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 101594545 (Comments: 1) | Florek89 (Discussed changesets: 39) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4945061 Mam wątpliwości co do uwagi, bo brzmi jak nazwa opisowa, ale jak piszesz, że na pewno poprawne to podrzucam, bo może jesteś w stanie to potwierdzić/zaprzeczyć. commented 2025-10-10 21:35:36 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,148 |
| 165152434 (Comments: 2) | Srdjan023 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Обзиром да се указани проблем игнорише неколико недеља, а од старта није испоштована предвиђена процедура јавне расправе пре импортова... commented 2025-10-10 20:43:26 UTC by brdrsrsu ♦6 |
| 173111864 (Comments: 1) | Maperooney (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi.. I merged your info wth the present addressnode. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-10 20:33:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173111646 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 11) | Note: more than 7 mapwithai-derived features in this changeset. The JOSM plugin had trouble with tags when uploading to an existing changeset. commented 2025-10-10 20:29:27 UTC by pwbriggs ♦76 |
| 170747221 (Comments: 2) | Cèparlà (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, effectivement sur cette zone les vitesses dont très mal indiquées . Le pont est bien a 50km/h. Voilà qui est mis à jour! Cordialement commented 2025-10-10 20:24:41 UTC by Cèparlà ♦6 |
| 173026260 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thank you for your comments. I'll review them in detail and, if necessary, reverse them. Best regards. commented 2025-10-10 20:16:01 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦18 |
| 173105319 (Comments: 1) | Fresno99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/6885165759, https://www.osm.org/node/11365101510more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the nodes back to the original position. commented 2025-10-10 20:11:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173109598 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Po raz kolejny: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-10 20:03:01 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173110065 (Comments: 2) | VolkanAykul (Discussed changesets: 2) | Geçmiş değişikliklerinizi incelerken aynı yeri geçmişte de sildiğinizi gördüm. İlgili değişikliğiniz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113778965 O değişikliğinizde de tarafınıza "Map what'... commented 2025-10-10 20:02:34 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 168978215 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Patrząc na to, co ten użytkownik tworzy, to pewnie nie jest to ulica Żołnierska... commented 2025-10-10 20:02:29 UTC by YomanNH ♦365 |
| 173107544 (Comments: 1) | John Sobiech (Discussed changesets: 1) | You only added a website and description to an address node, but did not note that there is also a business there. And no, website and description isn't engouh. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://w... commented 2025-10-10 20:01:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173110340 (Comments: 1) | Djann (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep Gelukt! oneway=no is trouwens default en hoef je niet te taggen. Hier is het wellicht verstandig om het te laten staan. Dat voorkomt dat een medemapper er weet oneway=yes van maakt. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 20:00:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173110801 (Comments: 1) | Harperrxx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Did you see this area: https://www.osm.org/way/145614349. I assume you create duplicate information. commented 2025-10-10 19:57:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 172703284 (Comments: 1) | ehrm (Discussed changesets: 1) | While this is an unregistered slum, it's been given a xenophobic colloquial name as political propaganda and has made its way here on OSM data. This needs to be changed to something more generic and less hateful. commented 2025-10-10 19:56:54 UTC by ehrm ♦1 |
| 173109780 (Comments: 1) | Dmitriy Mozgo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Что это за название такое интересное? :) commented 2025-10-10 19:44:46 UTC by HantDX ♦28 |
| 173109609 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-10 19:41:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173110584 (Comments: 1) | Thibault Rommel (Discussed changesets: 52) | *update omgeving Sint-Jozefskerk commented 2025-10-10 19:38:37 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦81 |
| 173082985 (Comments: 1) | ithianm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, una «Plazoleta de Eventos» no es un centro ecuestre (leisure=horse_riding). ¿Es un edificio? ¿Quizás algo como https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building=grandstand o https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... commented 2025-10-10 19:37:47 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦824 |
| 172916173 (Comments: 3) | Paul-François (Discussed changesets: 2) | On est d'accord. Raison de plus de considérer les halles des années 60 comme un bâtiment en construction et onn comme des halles sans horaires d'ouverture, ce n'est pas juste de la peinture ! commented 2025-10-10 19:25:58 UTC by trial ♦944 |
| 173109214 (Comments: 3) | Djann (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep gewoon in dat stukje de regels verwijderen. iD is een lastige editor soms. Die maakt anders van no>yes. Dus alle tags zichtbaar kiezen en dan de regels verwijderen van de tweewielers. Succes, eggie commented 2025-10-10 19:24:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173091789 (Comments: 2) | mampir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не е нарочно :) Моята програма OsmAnd~ ги изтри, без да ме пита. Ще ги оправя. commented 2025-10-10 19:20:13 UTC by mampir ♦1 |
 | 173086560 (Comments: 1) | Administration Communale de Kehlen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moien, a wëlkomm op OpenStreetMap! Ech wënschen Iech vill Erfolleg a Spaass beim Mappen an Ärer Gemeng. BG commented 2025-10-10 19:10:54 UTC by Stereo ♦360 |
| 173108125 (Comments: 1) | DKlaasen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag DKlaasen, Wellicht beter highway=footway gebruiken. pedestrian gebruiken we voor voetgangersgebieden.. Bv in winkelgebieden. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 19:09:56 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173103951 (Comments: 1) | Reine-claude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci pour la mise à jour. Tu as demandé une revue pour le changeset. D'après le wiki tu pourrais ajouter cycleway:left:lane=pictogram s'il y a des pictos vélo pour rappeler le double-sens cyclable. commented 2025-10-10 18:58:01 UTC by Gonéo ♦238 |
| 172762310 (Comments: 1) | roozbehetech (Discussed changesets: 2) | خدمات سیم پیچی الکتروموتور و ژنراتور commented 2025-10-10 18:55:14 UTC by roozbehetech ♦2 |
| 172998439 (Comments: 1) | pidugu konda reddy (Discussed changesets: 783) | Hi Pidugu, just a tip—no need to include your bio (or arguably, data sources) in your changset comment—that's what the bio of your OSM profile and the Source field of the changeset are for, respectively (and neither of which contains... commented 2025-10-10 18:45:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦48 |
| 173093144 (Comments: 1) | mixdm (Discussed changesets: 17) | это мой дом commented 2025-10-10 18:41:32 UTC by CibAG ♦1 |
| 170123370 (Comments: 2) | icaro98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ご指摘ありがとうございます。 早急に確認いたします。 なお、メールチェックを怠り返答が遅くなってしまいました。失礼いたしました。 commented 2025-10-10 18:39:42 UTC by icaro98 ♦1 |
| 173052397 (Comments: 1) | paulhell (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for updating the dentist closure, you dropped the building tag so I've restored that back. Cheers, Alex commented 2025-10-10 18:25:20 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦101 |
| 173096805 (Comments: 1) | MF20AC (Discussed changesets: 2) | na przyszłość, nie łącz granic ewidencyjnych z drogami commented 2025-10-10 18:24:11 UTC by Yog Sot ♦317 |
| 173052776 (Comments: 1) | paulhell (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. A useful bit of history, I recognise Meads name from the Wilton Court Hotel he also funded. commented 2025-10-10 18:21:24 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦101 |
| 173098649 (Comments: 2) | emoerup (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello Frans S Thanks for your feedback. I was concentrating on the residential area. I saw that the buildings were not mapped. But I thought it was ok, and didn't try to see if I had access to map them. Kind regards Erik - em... commented 2025-10-10 18:15:52 UTC by emoerup ♦4 |
| 173047537 (Comments: 3) | jumplondon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I posted a thread on the community forum to continue this discussion - it raises enough questions that I don't think the comments section of the changeset can be a productive place to discuss them or document the answers. https://community.... commented 2025-10-10 17:59:47 UTC by jumplondon ♦1 |
| 172882578 (Comments: 5) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 608) | @Philet2137 >Tu chodzi o stan formalny. W OSM construction dotyczy stanu w terenie, bo też jest to podstawowa zasada OSM. @voltairovicz: "Ale tu nie chodzi o to, żeby chodzić teraz po budowie" Nie trzeba ch... commented 2025-10-10 17:57:59 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,309 |
| 173106581 (Comments: 1) | Donnut (Discussed changesets: 1) | This change I made is wrong. I thought the mosque was bigger, but the additional area is the square in front of the mosque. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173106581 ... commented 2025-10-10 17:52:19 UTC by Donnut ♦1 |
 | 169906176 (Comments: 4) | FouadYammine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reproducing seeds is the main activity of this farm. But I didnt find even the regular 'farm' type. commented 2025-10-10 17:51:51 UTC by FouadYammine ♦1 |
| 172880593 (Comments: 5) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 127) | Nie wykluczam, że na Skyscrapercity masz wątek poświęcony LK372, trzeba poszukać commented 2025-10-10 17:48:47 UTC by Anas masuris ♦136 |
| 173104433 (Comments: 6) | prinshoek (Discussed changesets: 2) | keurig commented 2025-10-10 17:47:21 UTC by prinshoek ♦1 |
| 173100658 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ya un signe où il y a écrit rue aeria sport ? commented 2025-10-10 17:44:25 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 173097509 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 31) | И добавен intermittent=yes към поток в другия край на държавата :). commented 2025-10-10 17:39:42 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 173086509 (Comments: 2) | geow (Discussed changesets: 46) | Danke, sehr aufmerksam 🖖 Fast alles richtig gemacht Locker sind nicht mein Spezialgebiet 😉Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker ist zur Referenzieung auch noch die PLZ erforderlich. commented 2025-10-10 17:37:50 UTC by geow ♦450 |
| 173055985 (Comments: 3) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Правилно помня, в рамките на околовръстното е забранено да се движат каруци. Неофициално знаем какво е положението, не мисля че има нужда... commented 2025-10-10 17:37:39 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 173105615 (Comments: 1) | bandsonly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. "Ek Kütüphane Binası" olarak adlandırdığınız bina uydu görüntülerinde görünmüyor. Doğru yere eklediğinize emin misiniz?Bu bina yeni mi inşa edildi? commented 2025-10-10 17:36:26 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172295508 (Comments: 10) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 79) | no, stan ma istotne znaczenie jak w 1940 istniała droga, w 2040 będzie droga a teraz jest ścieżka, to do zmapowania w OSM jest ścieżka commented 2025-10-10 17:28:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 172883446 (Comments: 3) | gscscnd (Discussed changesets: 26) | Dzięki za błyskawiczną poprawę :) commented 2025-10-10 17:25:11 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦747 |
| 173101757 (Comments: 1) | Tordem (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Burada gerçekten bir anıt var mı? Yoksa, mola noktanızı kaydetmek isterken yanlışlıkla mı oluşturdunuz? Hello. Is there really a monument here? Or did you create it by mistake while trying to save your rest stop point?... commented 2025-10-10 17:21:37 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173097845 (Comments: 1) | chiche (Discussed changesets: 3) | Адреса на блока е отбелязан върху самата сграда, не е необходимо да го дублирате. commented 2025-10-10 17:17:23 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 173090507 (Comments: 1) | operation_mogul (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128702266... commented 2025-10-10 17:14:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173093790 (Comments: 5) | madu21 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436917795<... commented 2025-10-10 17:14:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173099053 (Comments: 2) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 6) | 👍 commented 2025-10-10 17:13:46 UTC by notabear ♦2 |
| 173099511 (Comments: 1) | technician_lyft (Discussed changesets: 15) | thank you so much for this commented 2025-10-10 17:09:18 UTC by Udarian ♦499 |
| 172382342 (Comments: 3) | DOMGG (Discussed changesets: 5) | Proszę: https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/ Zdjęcia są wykonywane co kilka dni. Oczywiście czasem są chmury i nic nie widać. commented 2025-10-10 17:02:42 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,309 |
| 172963782 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | ciao Bibo, anche qui vale la stessa cosa, sono tutti doppioni, le stazioni sono già mappati da tanti anni... commented 2025-10-10 16:56:31 UTC by dieterdreist ♦863 |
| 172883066 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 608) | Czy w ogóle jest sens dodawać takie rwane fragmenciki construction? Moim zdaniem lepiej poczekać, aż budowa się rozkręci i dodać całość. Aktualność czegoś takiego wynosi max kilka dni. Póki co mieliśmy pochmurne dni, zapewn... commented 2025-10-10 16:53:43 UTC by voltairovicz ♦218 |
| 169922971 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 38) | I have blocked you commented 2025-10-10 16:47:44 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 172865470 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 38) | Nie będę się rozpisywać przy 4 zmianach. commented 2025-10-10 16:45:23 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 172915045 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 38) | Było przedyskutowane na Discordzie polskiej społeczności OSM - ta droga ma mieć primary, ponieważ nie powinno zostawiać się luk w primary. Routery też biora penalty za zmainę z primary na secondary. commented 2025-10-10 16:44:08 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 169801349 (Comments: 3) | achyutha (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the explanation! I have reverted this changeset, effectively restoring the alley as it was before. This way, the history is preserved. Feel free to reclassify it as a footpath based on your verification and resources. https://www.op... commented 2025-10-10 16:32:00 UTC by cuzi ♦128 |
| 172829171 (Comments: 3) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 181) | Cześć, dzięki za dokładne sprawdzenie mojej edycji - zdarzają mi się (jak każdemu) błędy :) Co do pierwszego to tak, faktycznie iD mi zmieniło w ostatniej chwili kolejność podpowiedzi. Co do punktów kontroli, to przy... commented 2025-10-10 16:28:44 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦747 |
| 173099381 (Comments: 1) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag notabear, Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode en één fast food verwijderd op hetzelfde punt. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 15:54:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173099012 (Comments: 1) | Haags Happie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Gebruik svp Deprecated. Use currency:XBT=* ipv https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:bitcoin MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 15:50:22 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172801849 (Comments: 2) | Comenald (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der kommentierte Pfad ist tatsächlich auch auf dem Luftbild zu sehen. Allgemeiner hatte ich mir zu dem Zeitpunkt folgendes dabei gedacht: - wahrscheinlich ist mehr richtig als falsch und ich erziele damit in Summe eine Verbesserung - die A... commented 2025-10-10 15:47:00 UTC by Comenald ♦1 |
| 173096460 (Comments: 1) | Maperooney (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-10 15:46:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 150008448 (Comments: 1) | EnumMapper (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hello EnumMapper, I see that you added a bunch of sidewalks to the map. However in many places they are not connected to the other sidewalks and the roads around them. This makes it so that routers send pedestrians along unnecessary detours (e... commented 2025-10-10 15:27:54 UTC by draconic_mapper ♦2 |
 | 172039895 (Comments: 2) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 96) | South Korea uses the junction names to describe the located area. ¿Why can't North Korea do the same? commented 2025-10-10 15:06:38 UTC by BigKev97 ♦83 |
| 41662747 (Comments: 5) | brunfbart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Datensatz fällt (zumindest 9 Jahre später) nicht unter die Erklärung der Website, sondern wird über die Seite als "OpenData" unter CC BY 4.0 zur Verfügung gestellt, etwa hier: https://www.bast.de/DE/Publikatione... commented 2025-10-10 14:51:35 UTC by x a ♦9 |
| 173098778 (Comments: 1) | aktivnutzer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nachsatz: es gibt keine ausgeschilderte Beschränkung. commented 2025-10-10 14:50:56 UTC by aktivnutzer ♦3 |
| 173091456 (Comments: 1) | 454962315 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists ... commented 2025-10-10 14:45:05 UTC by MassCartog ♦197 |
| 173097033 (Comments: 1) | asitambuke (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo asitambuke, abgerissene Gebäude sollten lieber mit `demolished:building=...` getaggt werden, statt sie zu entfernen. Das Gebäude wird dann nicht mehr gerendert und es verhindert, dass andere Mapper ein Gebäude auf Basis vo... commented 2025-10-10 14:41:58 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦31 |
| 173082085 (Comments: 1) | Mehmet KERİMOĞLU (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bu ağaçlandırma sahalarının gerçekten bir adı var mı? Yoksa siz ad boş kalmasın diye mi yazdınız? Adı yoksa name=* etiketi boş kalmalı. Burası henüz ağaçlandırılmadı ise alanı çizmeniz de do... commented 2025-10-10 14:32:54 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 170424539 (Comments: 1) | Emilio L (Discussed changesets: 13) | A commercially used area is not a building. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial commented 2025-10-10 14:30:07 UTC by Papa-online ♦28 |
| 173067180 (Comments: 2) | tday44 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I went ahead and tried fixing this up for you... took some searching along the road to find the compacted gravel section, and added asphalt as the surface to the paved parts. Made a multipolygon to create an outline for the picnic area. ... commented 2025-10-10 14:25:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,184 |
| 173092507 (Comments: 1) | Jerzy Jeżewski (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-10 14:14:29 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173096900 (Comments: 1) | Nadja15 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Se denna kartanteckning för motivation till varför jag ändrade tillbaka: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4966142 commented 2025-10-10 14:08:50 UTC by Nadja15 ♦15 |
| 173072169 (Comments: 1) | DLoop (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks like you added the address to the road, I added the transfer building and put it on that. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173072169 commented 2025-10-10 14:01:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,184 |
 | 160619491 (Comments: 2) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 96) | Error del nombre de apellido. commented 2025-10-10 13:58:17 UTC by BigKev97 ♦83 |
| 169087230 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Aweech! My name is Sumit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft and Lalit’s Teammate. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Yes, you are right, in this case Lyft-owned aerial imagery is outdated. I apologize for the incorr... commented 2025-10-10 13:57:30 UTC by skumarchandela_lyft ♦11 |
| 173043349 (Comments: 2) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, Udarian My name is Shubham and I’m Ravinder’s teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your feedback. Regarding my edits: I classified the way as residential because it appeared to be located at the front ... commented 2025-10-10 13:43:41 UTC by subham_lyft ♦3 |
| 173038779 (Comments: 2) | subham_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Udarian My name is Shubham and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. About my edits: The recent road I added is supported by Lyft-owned aerial imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N_bsXbrxEU537l_SPqjFZwZ8-S-u2OX3/view?usp=sharing) ... commented 2025-10-10 13:27:19 UTC by subham_lyft ♦3 |
| 130124891 (Comments: 2) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 78) | Merci pour les suggestions. J'ai fait les modifs, mais j'ai retenu brand=Mouvement Emmaüs suggéré par iD et plus fréquent. N'hésite pas à faire ce type de modification par toi-même !<... commented 2025-10-10 13:27:02 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,155 |
| 173045937 (Comments: 2) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 15) | Sorry, but I also forgot to mention my concern about fake junction layouts as well. The DWG has asked us to try and urge you change your editing practices, but this is something that I cannot handle alone due to so many real life issues. commented 2025-10-10 13:24:40 UTC by ika-chan! ♦291 |
| 172118369 (Comments: 1) | syahmin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. There is no need to map paths leading to buildings which can be seen from the through going highway. (and they are no unclassified highways) Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-10-10 13:22:36 UTC by Frans S ♦9,909 |
| 173094534 (Comments: 1) | SoulCover (Discussed changesets: 1) | source=survey;aerial imagery commented 2025-10-10 13:14:31 UTC by SoulCover ♦1 |
| 173092422 (Comments: 1) | cMartin (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ich nochmal :) ich seh grad, dass du den Schlüssel "design" einsetzt. Dieser ist im Wiki dokumentiert, jedoch als Zusatz für Strommasten, weshalb ich ihn in diesem Zusammenhang nicht nutzen würde. https://wik... commented 2025-10-10 13:08:00 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,639 |
| 173076003 (Comments: 1) | Roberitzy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Está corrcta esta edición? el local se cambió de dirección? porque cambió el nombre de la calle y la numeración, pero el punto quedó donde mismo. saludos commented 2025-10-10 13:06:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 173092491 (Comments: 2) | Gerstbroodje (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wel spatie in postcode verwijderd commented 2025-10-10 13:04:52 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173043543 (Comments: 4) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 14) | In Quebec, when we validate and complete the data in a specific area like this one, we are adding very precise data, so very short segments are often created. This is not an error. Thanks! commented 2025-10-10 13:02:47 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦429 |
| 173085507 (Comments: 5) | GeoBash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thx, Conform je beschrijving ingetekend. commented 2025-10-10 13:01:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173091540 (Comments: 1) | cMartin (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi :) im Forum wurde zuletzt etwas über MTB-Trails diskutiert und wie wir sie erfassen wollen. Noch sind wir uns nicht einig, jedoch habe ich die Diskussionen so interpretiert, dass diese Strecken nicht als "highway=cycleway" er... commented 2025-10-10 12:53:26 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,639 |
| 173089115 (Comments: 1) | thehighfliers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You business isn't part of a boundary! I revert you r SPAM entry. see https://www.osm.org/changeset/173093506 commented 2025-10-10 12:51:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 172124147 (Comments: 1) | Sharon Orengo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please tag the residential areas with a node and the kind of settlement as requested in the instructions. Please do not include a courtyard between a few buildings and map it as 1 building Best regards and keep... commented 2025-10-10 12:48:50 UTC by Frans S ♦9,909 |
| 173091377 (Comments: 1) | Ligaro Support (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 commented 2025-10-10 12:46:08 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172123090 (Comments: 1) | Oli G (MSF-G) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not forget to mark a settlement with a mark (hamlet, village etc) as requested in the instructions. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-10-10 12:42:04 UTC by Frans S ♦9,909 |
| 172524963 (Comments: 1) | Chris Denomy (Discussed changesets: 29) | This also introduced a gap in the coast path, which I fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172802429 . commented 2025-10-10 12:38:53 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦470 |
| 172526874 (Comments: 1) | Chris Denomy (Discussed changesets: 29) | It looks like this introduced a gap https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dpc in Wales_Coast_Path_Llyn_Coastal_Path 1820886 . I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173092758 . commented 2025-10-10 12:38:09 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦470 |
| 173077690 (Comments: 3) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 342) | Perfekt, tak for info. Jeg undlader adressedata fremover, det går både hurtigere og giver en mere ensartet mapping. Arbejder indtil videre i iD, hvilket fungerer udmærket, selvom jeg kan forstå at josm har flere funktioner. commented 2025-10-10 12:36:05 UTC by qrisztly ♦5 |
| 172804633 (Comments: 1) | Farzell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Имя только для собственных имен. Например “Александровский дворец” или “Магнит”. А вот местные названия, номера домов или тип... commented 2025-10-10 12:29:11 UTC by s777n ♦304 |
| 173072485 (Comments: 3) | steve_jobs (Discussed changesets: 1) | It works! https://www.osm.org/search?query=Topaz+Plaza+1981%2C+Davidson commented 2025-10-10 12:24:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 172863876 (Comments: 2) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 114) | Corregido. Gracias por avisar. commented 2025-10-10 12:10:43 UTC by dcapillae ♦382 |
| 173048529 (Comments: 2) | letsridebikes (Discussed changesets: 41) | Apologies, think that was a mistake on my part. Partially reverted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173090678#map=19/51.379536/-2.363897 commented 2025-10-10 11:52:51 UTC by letsridebikes ♦65 |
| 170132508 (Comments: 1) | Stephen Males (Discussed changesets: 21) | Newleaf Parade is marked as one-way, but TfNSW buses are apparently still travelling the other direction. The current imagery doesn't appear to indicate one-way traffic. Please Check. commented 2025-10-10 11:45:31 UTC by donmac703 ♦6 |
| 153487598 (Comments: 1) | Mouette85 (Discussed changesets: 3) | hi Mouette85, I NOTICED YOU HAVE ADDED A HAIRSTYLIST IN CAPITAL LETTERS, we do not usually do it (save very short abbreviations), as we try to record the world neutrally. commented 2025-10-10 11:43:12 UTC by fmc_1 ♦5 |
| 169369915 (Comments: 1) | Thingummy (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi. I was looking at Sutton Gault, a location I'm familiar with. I notice that in this changeset you deleted the road bridge across the Old Bedford River: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31698238/history/3 I doubt the bridge is actual... commented 2025-10-10 11:40:21 UTC by Ian Jackson ♦2 |
| 173088147 (Comments: 1) | TimGram (Discussed changesets: 4) | Top, dank je. commented 2025-10-10 11:26:23 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦677 |
| 173046307 (Comments: 1) | Chanbasha2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've just noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436669796 - does it actually match what is actually on the ground here? It does not look like it from the imagery. Best Regards, Andy commented 2025-10-10 11:25:33 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173081542 (Comments: 1) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 9) | Not necessary. You are just creating misaligned roads here. TomTom should not be pushing this challenge. commented 2025-10-10 11:23:57 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦677 |
| 173087202 (Comments: 1) | aarraabbeellaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM :) It seems there is some copypasta with a google docs link which snuck in the access tags. I did a quick check on the parking spots only on Kohila tänav, i don't know if there's more of them elsewhere. Can you... commented 2025-10-10 11:16:14 UTC by tshikaboom ♦6 |
| 173088452 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 124) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436894547<... commented 2025-10-10 11:10:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 169301172 (Comments: 4) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 46) | Grazie mille, ne terrò conto! commented 2025-10-10 11:10:21 UTC by f_gonella ♦35 |
| 173066968 (Comments: 4) | TimGram (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Tim, Ik zie dat je nooit een welkomstmail hebt ontvangen van de Dutch Community.. Bij deze alsnog...Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggi... commented 2025-10-10 11:09:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 171186538 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 46) | Grazie, ripristinato classificazione. commented 2025-10-10 11:08:34 UTC by f_gonella ♦35 |
| 173071478 (Comments: 3) | TimGram (Discussed changesets: 4) | Naamlabels zijn verwijderd https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173088147 commented 2025-10-10 10:53:19 UTC by TimGram ♦3 |
| 173035845 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ciao Bibo, anche qui hai inserito un doppione della stazione Quattro Venti, generalmente è molto improbabile che manchino stazioni nel territorio di Roma, in questo caso l'abbiamo dal 2011: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101289622 Q... commented 2025-10-10 10:49:41 UTC by fmc_1 ♦5 |
| 171752009 (Comments: 3) | jajanja3 (Discussed changesets: 25) | So unfortunately if you look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:city , it should be used for towns too. In the UK addr:city usually uses the 'post town', which Gillingham is. So a village next to Gillingham would still use addr... commented 2025-10-10 10:45:57 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦94 |
| 168479096 (Comments: 1) | gigi2037 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ciao Gigi, ho notato che hai modificato la Stazione di Santa Palomba da public_transport=station in stop_position (e mi trovi d'accordo), segnalo che sarebbe da modificare anche railway=station in railway=stop (ho fatto ora la modifica). Purtrop... commented 2025-10-10 10:42:01 UTC by fmc_1 ♦5 |
| 173087324 (Comments: 1) | qumil (Discussed changesets: 61) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11393132908 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-10 10:41:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173087355 (Comments: 1) | qumil (Discussed changesets: 61) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11050719485 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-10 10:40:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173086294 (Comments: 1) | SerdarP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarını reklam amaçlı kullanmayınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-10 10:38:40 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173086245 (Comments: 1) | SerdarP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarını reklam amaçlı kullanmayınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-10 10:38:18 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172990686 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | Buongiorno Bibo, ti segnalo che non mancavano questi stazioni, ora sono doppi. Forse non hai visto le stazioni perché non sono rappresentati da nodi ma da aree (è migliore perché consente di capire l'estensione, la d... commented 2025-10-10 10:33:23 UTC by fmc_1 ♦5 |
| 173070140 (Comments: 2) | TimGram (Discussed changesets: 4) | Typfouten gecorrigeerd https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173087183 commented 2025-10-10 10:32:08 UTC by TimGram ♦3 |
| 172650953 (Comments: 3) | BerbiceRiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you very much! Have a great day commented 2025-10-10 10:21:14 UTC by brdrsrsu ♦6 |
| 173053700 (Comments: 1) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 53) | Imielin Rynek zniknął (znowu?) Relatify czasami usuwa losowo przystanki, zwłaszcza jak mają stary schemat tagowania - highway=bus_stop na jezdni i highway=platform jako linia na peronie (np. Katowice Sądowa). Imielin Rynek ma już właściwy,... commented 2025-10-10 10:19:38 UTC by zuicz ♦282 |
| 172908963 (Comments: 2) | 8462368 (Discussed changesets: 4) | P.S. Ich habe den Rad- und den Gehweg hier außerdem zu einer gemeinsamen path-Linie jeweils mit Detailattributen für den Geh- und den Radweganteil zusammengelegt. Hier gibt es aber verschiedene Mapping-Varianten - deine war also nicht unbe... commented 2025-10-10 10:08:53 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦423 |
| 173062529 (Comments: 1) | GIGAS25 (Discussed changesets: 2) | What does note=7 mean? commented 2025-10-10 10:07:42 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦188 |
| 172936688 (Comments: 6) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Sehr gut, dann sind wir uns doch zumindest in der Sache einig. Weiterhin frohes Mappen! commented 2025-10-10 10:06:58 UTC by travelling_salesman ♦9 |
| 173068331 (Comments: 3) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 50) | bicycle:backward=use_sidepath toegevoegd tussen fietspad aansluitingen. Groet eggie commented 2025-10-10 09:59:22 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172845687 (Comments: 2) | Guy Kazakov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes you're right the elevators should connect different levels but previously the connections were to the parallel road at the same level and not the correct road at level 0. edit as you see fit commented 2025-10-10 09:58:46 UTC by Guy Kazakov ♦1 |
| X | 173077008 (Comments: 1) | STWSK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changesets should ideally be kept small and localized, please! They're much more informative and less globally visible if you do that. This change combines parking in Switzerland with garages in Saskatchewan, Canada, so it would have been... commented 2025-10-10 09:49:27 UTC by Andrew Chadwick ♦60 |
| 172774697 (Comments: 1) | sandstorm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao sandstorm https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4998830 mentions that there is *no* building here in construction. Can you tell us more about the `knowledge`where you got the outline from? Greetings, habi commented 2025-10-10 09:39:17 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173084582 (Comments: 1) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 202) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-10-10 09:37:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173083759 (Comments: 1) | JaKiLa1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag JaKiLa1, De winkel staat al op de kaart. Ik heb je bijdrage verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 09:36:50 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173083795 (Comments: 1) | Mamutinka (Discussed changesets: 92) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431821117 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-10-10 09:31:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173083503 (Comments: 1) | Szelma Tattoo Wrocław (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-10 09:31:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173058402 (Comments: 1) | retti68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wie im in der Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4997751 beschrieben. Ist dieser 'Viehsteig' auch in anderen Kartenwerken drin und wird regelmässig begangen. https://nakarte.me/#m=15/47.21402/12.13255&l=O/Sr |
| 151534924 (Comments: 1) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 16) | This changeset incorrectly connected a bridge to the road it crosses. Please don't use roads as area relation members. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2025-10-10 09:08:59 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 173083440 (Comments: 1) | RDiach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Привіт RDiach, ласкаво просимо і дякуємо за ваш внесок! Щоб полегшити співпрацю та допомогти іншим зрозуміти ваші зміни, найкраще додат... commented 2025-10-10 09:06:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 147449539 (Comments: 1) | Carlos_Sánchez (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bridges should not connect to roads they cross. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147449539 commented 2025-10-10 08:54:21 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 154692517 (Comments: 1) | Mykhailo Sindieiev (Discussed changesets: 1) | The bridge should not be connected to the road it crosses. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154692517 commented 2025-10-10 08:52:13 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 165375268 (Comments: 4) | Peri3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Un saludo commented 2025-10-10 08:37:50 UTC by Peri3 ♦1 |
| 123155689 (Comments: 4) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 69) | Ich habe 9864070317 "zur Sicherheit" auch gelöscht. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173081874 commented 2025-10-10 08:20:25 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 173078195 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 13) | There's obviously something there given the `highway=` drawn to the `=peak` commented 2025-10-10 08:06:07 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,618 |
| 173032125 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 13) | I don't understand what's "disappearing", and you are still creating many more dragged points. Don't upload such mishaps. They do more harm than any good. commented 2025-10-10 08:01:06 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,618 |
| 172894145 (Comments: 1) | 특전포병 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 부대 삭제한 이유가 있나요? commented 2025-10-10 07:54:57 UTC by 록시너기 ♦1 |
| 173070268 (Comments: 1) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ik heb rcn route 20-44 hersteld. Was nog best een klusje. Wat je met ID toevoegt aan een route komt altijd onderaan te staan en dat is meestal niet de goede plek. In dit geval dus ook niet. De routedelen moesten ook nog de role forward krijgen,... commented 2025-10-10 07:39:49 UTC by dvdhoven ♦945 |
| 166608727 (Comments: 2) | Zilvervisje (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ahhh die zebra is in juni weer teruggekomen. 'k Zie het al. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-10 07:38:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173050948 (Comments: 4) | jOE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für deine ausführliche Diskussion im Forum! commented 2025-10-10 07:12:24 UTC by jOE ♦1 |
| 172956488 (Comments: 3) | dzonigis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Super, hvala. Ako želiš, možeš da se priključiš zajednici OSM Srbija preko Telegram kanala osm_sr, ili preko foruma: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64. commented 2025-10-10 07:10:45 UTC by MaliMrav ♦52 |
| 173047679 (Comments: 2) | _PBl_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-10-10 06:53:51 UTC by _PBl_ ♦2 |
| 172717528 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | I'm wondering why information=* is set to proposed:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as ref, description, operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, website, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal? commented 2025-10-10 06:52:55 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,940 |
| 172717338 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | I'm wondering why information=* is set to demolished:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal? commented 2025-10-10 06:52:29 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,940 |
| 172717248 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | I'm wondering why information=* is set to abandoned:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as covered, description, operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal? commented 2025-10-10 06:52:07 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,940 |
| 172716995 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | I'm wondering why information=* is set to was:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal? commented 2025-10-10 06:51:36 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,940 |
| 173070015 (Comments: 2) | Zinzmi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Zinzmi, Hat sich die Beschilderung hier etwa geändert? Bisher wer der Weg an der Straße als reiner Radweg beschildert (das hast du ja mittlerweile wieder so eingetragen). Der zurückgesetzte Weg war aber an allen drei Zugä... commented 2025-10-10 06:45:51 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,401 |
| 172971985 (Comments: 4) | fghj753 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Thanks y'all! Isn't there a script that should do the semi- or even automatic imports? What happened to that? commented 2025-10-10 06:41:33 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦15 |
| 173069380 (Comments: 2) | Mark-Andrew (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, Du hast recht. Hatte ich gestern nacht übersehen. Habe es wieder korrigiert. commented 2025-10-10 06:40:53 UTC by Mark-Andrew ♦4 |
| 169125995 (Comments: 4) | TommyRobloxOfficial (Discussed changesets: 14) | Proszę przywrócić DGP. Skasowałeś ją bez żadnych podstaw. Wygląda to na wandalizm. commented 2025-10-10 06:38:50 UTC by Interswd ♦37 |
| 172809810 (Comments: 5) | wadenick (Discussed changesets: 5) | Check out the "follow line" feature under Tools. Really handy if you have to re-use points on an existing way. And since you asked, I spotted this overlap tonight: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13194759713 commented 2025-10-10 06:29:42 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
| 173077041 (Comments: 1) | Bitmap Adoption (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-10 06:24:28 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173077004 (Comments: 1) | campbelltree (Discussed changesets: 1) | Forgot to mention this is based on note #4707855; I'm used to it showing up in closed:note commented 2025-10-10 05:37:35 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 172996175 (Comments: 1) | likooo (Discussed changesets: 2) | 将近70公里的山路啊？好体力 commented 2025-10-10 04:50:27 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦14 |
| 173026793 (Comments: 2) | felixthefreak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution. Is "Consign Design" furniture shop still here, or was it replaced? commented 2025-10-10 04:50:18 UTC by pwbriggs ♦76 |
| 160837978 (Comments: 1) | leonieegslr (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12465522755 - what is here? Their office in nor marked building? Meeting spot? commented 2025-10-10 04:45:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 76251606 (Comments: 1) | Mechtal (Discussed changesets: 35) | wycofałem tą edycję - mimo prób kontaktu nie widać poprawy błędnych edycji https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173076011 commented 2025-10-10 04:42:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 172935358 (Comments: 2) | Ozge Inan (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173075718 commented 2025-10-10 04:25:47 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 172831984 (Comments: 1) | Midstream09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset incorrectly connected a bridge to the road it crosses --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172831984 commented 2025-10-10 04:22:51 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 172797894 (Comments: 2) | Evros1969 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hllo söm4324 danke für deine Korrekturen und Umbauten der Pfarrkirche St Martin. Das hast du für mich gut bearbeitet, sieht gut aus auf 3D. In die Zukunft werde ich das Shema building udd building=part besser beherrschen dank deiner Ra... commented 2025-10-10 04:22:09 UTC by Evros1969 ♦13 |
| 173075307 (Comments: 2) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 101) | This changeset was too large and split by JOSM on upload so added the above comment to both changesets. commented 2025-10-10 04:20:58 UTC by nevw ♦2,049 |
| 173075314 (Comments: 1) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 101) | There was a tiny remnant of Jardine National Park mapped on osm but this bit was not on CAPAD 2024 so is deleted. Other tiny remnants of Jardine NP in CAPAD 2024 are not mapped in osm anyway. commented 2025-10-10 04:16:23 UTC by nevw ♦2,049 |
| 173074323 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 16) | I did not remove Industrial Park Road, the VT CRC roads (Research Center/Kraft/Pratt Drive), Southgate Drive, Beamer Way, Washington Street, Kent Street, and Alumni Mall from the Smart Way Bus (SW) route relation because doing so would take a lot of ... commented 2025-10-10 04:05:17 UTC by Frank Peng ♦27 |
| 171522571 (Comments: 1) | cabildo was (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Cabildos. He visto que has estado mapeando ríos y quebradas, eso está muy bien. Solo te quería contar que waterway representa el flujo del agua, y esta siempre es aguas abajo: conecta con otro río o quebrada o ... commented 2025-10-10 04:00:20 UTC by AngocA ♦199 |
| 172683623 (Comments: 1) | Federico Explorador (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hola Federico. Veo que has estado mapeando meandros. Si bien un meandro parece que no se moviera el agua, de alguna forma debe tener un flujo. Por eso, al usar la etiqueta waterway (flujo de agua) para mapear meandros, se deben conectar con ot... commented 2025-10-10 03:43:07 UTC by AngocA ♦199 |
| 173072338 (Comments: 1) | Nate Wildermuth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Could you give a source for the names you used here? The name tag should only be used for common, widely-used names and not used to describe things. commented 2025-10-10 03:21:39 UTC by MassCartog ♦197 |
| 173070546 (Comments: 10) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 190) | Si, estoy al tanto commented 2025-10-10 02:57:57 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦14 |
| X | 173021435 (Comments: 1) | Baron Harkonnen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please save in between edits in completely different areas. commented 2025-10-10 02:04:13 UTC by InsertUser ♦460 |
 | 128244501 (Comments: 9) | NunoCaldeira (Discussed changesets: 23) | https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/fixme=validate%20geometry%20using%20the%20maproulette%20task#chronology - at current rate it will be completed by 2040, but admittedly it is being reviewed and going down commented 2025-10-10 01:59:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 166488397 (Comments: 1) | غيثمحمدخربشه (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18834 commented 2025-10-10 01:53:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173064939 (Comments: 1) | Robert_pl12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18833 commented 2025-10-10 01:45:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173065310 (Comments: 2) | Banana_men (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18832 commented 2025-10-10 01:42:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173073236 (Comments: 1) | Alex Paré (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pour plus d'infos voir: https://www.bromont.net/utilisation-des-sentiers-officiels-du-domaine-naturel-du-lac-gale-et-respect-de-la-servitude-de-conservation/ commented 2025-10-10 01:40:23 UTC by Alex Paré ♦2 |
| 166513565 (Comments: 1) | Somnath Darkunde (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nothing fixed. just moved a node slightly --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166513565 commented 2025-10-10 01:38:24 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 166685449 (Comments: 1) | Somnath Darkunde (Discussed changesets: 5) | nothing fixed --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166685449 commented 2025-10-10 01:21:56 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 172684554 (Comments: 2) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Der Tag check_date ist laut OSM-Wiki da sinnvoll, wo sich Daten ggf. des Öfteren ändern können wie Öffnungszeiten oder Leerzeiten eines Briefkastens. Auch umfasst check_date, das ein Objekt VOLLSTÄNDIG, also alle Tags davon, ... commented 2025-10-10 01:18:13 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦136 |
| 173071839 (Comments: 1) | Rodrigo Rega (Discussed changesets: 32) | Added boards. Source: note #3665124, #3665125 commented 2025-10-10 00:02:18 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦354 |
| 173066449 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 23:36:54 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 171858285 (Comments: 3) | Thermostopqc (Discussed changesets: 2) | (machine translation into French/traduction automatique en français) Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! Je pense qu'il y a eu un problème : vous avez accidentellement transformé toute la zone indust... commented 2025-10-09 23:33:51 UTC by TagaSanPedroAko ♦526 |
| 172340084 (Comments: 2) | Andrsur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Да, я только узнал, но я там был и данные все равно верные commented 2025-10-09 23:06:57 UTC by Andrsur ♦1 |
 | 173018998 (Comments: 1) | Derek Morr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Accidentally damaged the S150 road by merging bridges and roads. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173071022 commented 2025-10-09 23:06:57 UTC by Derek Morr ♦5 |
| 173016838 (Comments: 9) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 24) | Entsprechend deiner Ausführungen sind also die Endstücke, derzeit als Secondary oder Primary gekennzeichnet, zu Motorway Link zu ändern. Gleichzeitig ist (in diesem Fall) der Tag zone:traffic=DE:rural oder alternativ motorway=no hinzuz... commented 2025-10-09 22:46:29 UTC by vanagaudi ♦27 |
| 173019696 (Comments: 5) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Fa, lo ví hace 4 meses en su primer parada en el Garrahan, igual tiene lógica commented 2025-10-09 22:34:04 UTC by AgusQui ♦606 |
| 173065894 (Comments: 1) | MC Cliste (Discussed changesets: 13) | Je me permets de rappeler qu'il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter "crop=grape" contrairement à ce que suggère l'éditeur car par définition la vigne produit du raisin. Et il y a enco... commented 2025-10-09 22:31:08 UTC by acubens71 ♦37 |
| 173053932 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 423) | Reverted commented 2025-10-09 22:24:59 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173036260 (Comments: 1) | irish34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. commented 2025-10-09 22:24:55 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 173023532 (Comments: 1) | Sifen Wakitola (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: What you might be seeing is the imagery offset has changed since this was first maped. To adjust the offset, select the background icon in the editor, the towards the bottom, move the imagery to match to the existing background -... commented 2025-10-09 22:24:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 173037277 (Comments: 1) | Foxscotch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding all of the sidewalks. it one of my favoriate things to do. If you are interested in adding more detail, check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide. I'll ... commented 2025-10-09 22:21:47 UTC by Glassman ♦5,433 |
| 173069694 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 451) | Actually a few trees, and some hedges in Towthorpe commented 2025-10-09 22:06:24 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 172943433 (Comments: 2) | Magick93 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello 5359! Great catch! Those tags must have come over from QGIS when the public source data was split into smaller manageable chunks. The ID tag is simply a sequential number for each file/chunk, and the size tag indicates the number of elements... commented 2025-10-09 22:02:47 UTC by Magick93 ♦37 |
| 173064293 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 272) | To nie duplikat - istnieje zarówno Wysoka, część Gdyni, jak i Wysoka, część Gdańska. commented 2025-10-09 21:51:09 UTC by czebureks ♦118 |
| 172872456 (Comments: 2) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Si, lo vi, es mejor poner "Ex Correo Central" honestamente commented 2025-10-09 21:50:14 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦14 |
| 137664132 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 302) | Hi, This is the former Moor Park Golf Course. Sold off about 10 years ago. I've marked it abandoned:leisure=golf_course https://www.independent.ie/farming/a-whole-new-ball-game-in-meath/31603469.html commented 2025-10-09 21:45:55 UTC by VictorIE ♦947 |
| 173061170 (Comments: 1) | Texas Auto Part (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173069054 commented 2025-10-09 21:26:03 UTC by citrula ♦959 |
| 148267495 (Comments: 3) | d3mol3k (Discussed changesets: 107) | poprawię zaraz :) commented 2025-10-09 21:08:52 UTC by dzamper ♦152 |
| 168139613 (Comments: 3) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 19) | vielen Dank für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Das Vorgehen ist zwar auf den ersten Blick etwas umständlicher, aber mit etwas Routine geht es dann doch recht schnell. Gruß jmsbert, commented 2025-10-09 20:58:23 UTC by jmsbert ♦164 |
| 172727266 (Comments: 1) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Teniendo 1 solo ramal no tiene sentido poner ref=1-B, no hay otro ramal para diferenciar, con poner ref=1 alcanza. Después en name=* se indica el nombre completo del ramal. commented 2025-10-09 20:57:07 UTC by AgusQui ♦606 |
 | 171519484 (Comments: 3) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 119) | Hi, The Bing and Esri imagery shows the rivers essentially completely filling the areas. The Intermittent tag could well be applicable here. In that case I think one would have to be careful to mark the minimal size separately, since th... commented 2025-10-09 20:51:43 UTC by Tómas Ingi ♦82 |
| 173067211 (Comments: 1) | lilauid (Discussed changesets: 1) | 我誤上傳了這個變更，請幫忙撤銷。 commented 2025-10-09 20:43:07 UTC by lilauid ♦1 |
| 172947141 (Comments: 1) | wkLeon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fixed the very close points warning. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172947141 commented 2025-10-09 20:36:43 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173067123 (Comments: 1) | mookie_the_cat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Looks all good to me! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173067123 commented 2025-10-09 20:33:29 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173064084 (Comments: 5) | michal_f (Discussed changesets: 13) | Wielkość jak zwykle jest dyskusyjna. Uznaję, że centralny obszar parku jest wystarczająco duży, by zastosować właśnie takie rozwiązanie. Odpowiedź na Twoje pytanie właściwie nasuwa się sama. Używam prostych tagów, stosowanych po... commented 2025-10-09 20:27:24 UTC by michal_f ♦11 |
| 173027501 (Comments: 2) | Daniel Hulse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed node problems in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173067420#map=14/37.41191/-122.12262&layers=C Fixed accidental use of cycleway:left instead of cycleway:right here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173062375#map=16/37... commented 2025-10-09 20:26:18 UTC by Daniel Hulse ♦1 |
| 173025813 (Comments: 3) | Mapikids (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks :) commented 2025-10-09 20:25:44 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,639 |
| 172482197 (Comments: 1) | don-h (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao don-h Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Ich habe die von dir hier eingegebene Telefonnummer ins international Format konvertiert, da "wir" diese ... commented 2025-10-09 20:25:32 UTC by habi ♦1,914 |
| 172215781 (Comments: 2) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 58) | Bedankt voor de opmerking en de reparatie. commented 2025-10-09 20:25:25 UTC by lyctkel ♦343 |
| 173064661 (Comments: 1) | pixelpete (Discussed changesets: 10) | You forgot to update your changeset comment :) --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173064661 commented 2025-10-09 20:21:10 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173066611 (Comments: 3) | Cybermanx (Discussed changesets: 4) | Per precisare, con SOSPENDERE intendo un atto documentato formale, non il mero annuncio sul sito del tram/dichiarazione dell'assessore. Io nelle ordinanze ho sempre letto di modifiche della circolazione delle vie, ma mai una citazione agli sp... commented 2025-10-09 20:08:31 UTC by Cybermanx ♦7 |
| 172981853 (Comments: 1) | impiaaa (Discussed changesets: 25) | This is a failed upload; reverted in 173066845 commented 2025-10-09 20:05:51 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173015883 (Comments: 3) | GRi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Danke :) commented 2025-10-09 20:04:44 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,639 |
| 171407353 (Comments: 1) | kubash (Discussed changesets: 17) | Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-09 19:59:34 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 165788805 (Comments: 1) | Compositor (Discussed changesets: 28) | שלום, צריך לקשר ישירות לקובץ התמונה ולא לדף בויקישיתוף. כלומר: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/Byzantine_Watch_Tower_at_the_Nejmeh_Ridge.jpg ולא https://commons.wiki... commented 2025-10-09 19:58:58 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
| 165492379 (Comments: 2) | Martin Ligabue (Discussed changesets: 24) | it was imported badly by Embarto, they already made bad imports in the past, here I just merged the two features without checking for the validity of the data. I have no idea what the meaning might be... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1279... commented 2025-10-09 19:58:49 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦31 |
| 165816569 (Comments: 3) | pps345 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonsoir Peter, Merci pour ton retour. Je ne vois rien sur la première page qui dit qu'il y aurait quelque chose à cet endroit. par conséquent il n'est pas correct de dire qu'il y a une attraction touristique ... commented 2025-10-09 19:58:44 UTC by Marc_ch ♦282 |
| 173065279 (Comments: 1) | Banana_men (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-09 19:56:40 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172150201 (Comments: 3) | berjk (Discussed changesets: 38) | As for searching, searching with Nominatim for names given in `alt_name:de` works just as fine as for names given in `name:de`, so no need to be concerned with that. Still, whatever name is deemed to be the most common contemporary variant (I ... commented 2025-10-09 19:56:26 UTC by dzamper ♦152 |
| 155086669 (Comments: 1) | Avraham Chitrit (Discussed changesets: 1) | למה למחוק את התמונה ולשנות את השם לשם לא נכון? בוטל commented 2025-10-09 19:53:56 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
| 173064777 (Comments: 1) | TomN22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback... Tip Probeer de BAG adresnode intact te laten. Gewoon de bedrijfsinfo veranderen. Ik heb de BAG data teruggezet... commented 2025-10-09 19:50:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173064924 (Comments: 1) | DLoop (Discussed changesets: 2) | County road numbers aren't names or alt names, they're refs. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173064924 commented 2025-10-09 19:49:35 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,184 |
| 171454021 (Comments: 4) | segi (Discussed changesets: 24) | Vďaka. prešiel som to dúfam že som už všetko opravil. Ak ešte na niečo natrafíš daj vedieť. commented 2025-10-09 19:26:02 UTC by segi ♦37 |
| 172618665 (Comments: 2) | SonOfZenMaster (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia! Köszönöm. :) commented 2025-10-09 19:25:18 UTC by SonOfZenMaster ♦6 |
| 173007924 (Comments: 3) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 56) | Bonjour, Ce sont des chemins utilisés pour le fauchage. Ils sont bien présent sur les talus, ca forme des replats sur la pente. Ces replats me semblent inintéressant à cartographier, et je ne connais pas d'autre fa... commented 2025-10-09 19:24:03 UTC by AurélienQ ♦137 |
| 168440238 (Comments: 1) | a3n-abds (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Qu'est ce qui a motivé ce changeset ? Je ne suis pas tout à fait certain que cette piste réouvre un jour... commented 2025-10-09 19:19:27 UTC by AurélienQ ♦137 |
| 162325636 (Comments: 1) | Wolfgang Holtz (Discussed changesets: 24) | Zu deiner Frage: "warum ist hier auf halber Höhe des Deiches eine "zusätzliche künstliche Böschung"?" Auf der Linie verlief die ehemalige Freihafen Zollgrenze und hier stand u.a. ein Zaun. Seit der letzt... commented 2025-10-09 19:13:03 UTC by pyspam ♦2 |
| 172984036 (Comments: 1) | Black_Diamond (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks - couldn't tell what street it was on from the station :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172984036 commented 2025-10-09 18:54:05 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 172994097 (Comments: 2) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 149) | Name macht ja auch keinen Sinn in dem Fall commented 2025-10-09 18:44:49 UTC by thetornado76 ♦171 |
| 173046232 (Comments: 1) | Kunsthaus Michel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OSM! Wollt ihr eventuell etwas mehr als nur den Namen (wer oder was seid, Kontaktmöglickeiten) hinzufügen? commented 2025-10-09 18:44:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173063959 (Comments: 1) | raptorrescue (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinn... commented 2025-10-09 18:40:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173063181 (Comments: 1) | Robert_pl12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | A gdzie jest znak zakazu? Bo na pewno nie w rzeczywistości commented 2025-10-09 18:40:51 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173045327 (Comments: 1) | BitPinhall (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:40:44 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173052659 (Comments: 1) | BitPinhall (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:40:16 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173063125 (Comments: 1) | Robert_pl12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Przecież ta droga istnieje normalnie commented 2025-10-09 18:38:12 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173063745 (Comments: 1) | Robert_pl12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Co to za głupoty z tym usunięciem linii promu? commented 2025-10-09 18:36:31 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173015836 (Comments: 1) | jessrinehart (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:32:35 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173022710 (Comments: 1) | jessrinehart (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:32:28 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173015811 (Comments: 1) | jessrinehart (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:31:50 UTC by Comino ♦184 |
| 173054205 (Comments: 8) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-09 18:24:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 171997212 (Comments: 1) | Päivikki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moi, onko tähän rakennettu tällainen kävelytie, kun ei missään ilmakuvissa tai streetside-kuvissa näy? commented 2025-10-09 18:19:45 UTC by Sakari_N ♦84 |
| 169947609 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 263) | Zdravim, preco body motorway_junction na niecom, co nie je dialnica? commented 2025-10-09 18:18:52 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,672 |
 | 135953564 (Comments: 1) | Cephas Mũtai (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Cephas, Thank you for contributing to OSM data. I have notice you have mapped quite a number schools but with a wrong tag i.e. you have tagged the boundary of the school as a building instead of using the that on individual buildings. K... commented 2025-10-09 18:16:51 UTC by Walter Mayeku ♦10 |
| 173042455 (Comments: 3) | 0svald (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, thanks for clarifying. Edu õpingutega. commented 2025-10-09 18:16:01 UTC by fghj753 ♦58 |
| 173000491 (Comments: 2) | Ralftora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ignore the last request, i was informed this was EKA Architecture students' homework. commented 2025-10-09 18:09:40 UTC by fghj753 ♦58 |
| 173033910 (Comments: 2) | HBruch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for bringing this to my attention, kind regards. commented 2025-10-09 18:07:54 UTC by HBruch ♦1 |
| 67017187 (Comments: 2) | Benek123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I could not find these ruins at all in October 2025. pms63 commented 2025-10-09 17:52:53 UTC by pms63 ♦3 |
| 172627372 (Comments: 2) | VLD322 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for reaching out to me. I appreciate the positive contributions you have made in this area. If I recall correctly, this was one of my first interactions with your edits. Upon reviewing the quality of your other work, I revisited this and ma... commented 2025-10-09 17:50:37 UTC by VLD322 ♦1 |
| 173014505 (Comments: 3) | tegabo (Discussed changesets: 2) | You also realigned a way in this changeset. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173014505 commented 2025-10-09 17:32:19 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173027323 (Comments: 1) | DeflockEmily (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey there, don't see anything particularly wrong with this change. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173027323 commented 2025-10-09 17:31:25 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173060880 (Comments: 1) | tshikaboom (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks commented 2025-10-09 17:20:54 UTC by fghj753 ♦58 |
| 155007433 (Comments: 2) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 119) | Sorry for the late response. The way had a self intersection, and also was not properly connected to the crossing service ways. It looked like a total error. The same issue we can now see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15... commented 2025-10-09 17:13:32 UTC by gscholz ♦2,785 |
| 154972468 (Comments: 1) | nicola_yubo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi nicola_yubo, can you please edit the way properly, it is not connected to the crossing service ways. Kind regards Guido commented 2025-10-09 17:12:48 UTC by gscholz ♦2,785 |
| 173057937 (Comments: 1) | PiretS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tere, Piret. Kui sa tead, et oled parasjagu samas piirkonnas midagi muutmas, siis ei ole mõtet iga paari minuti tagant muudatusi eraldi changesetina üles laadida, vaid lisa need ühe suurema üleslaadimisena. iD värvib ü... commented 2025-10-09 17:06:11 UTC by fghj753 ♦58 |
| 173052668 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 38) | No ale chyba nie będę się rozpisywać przy zmianie tylko jednego tagu jednego obiektu. commented 2025-10-09 17:04:02 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 173059420 (Comments: 1) | Mehmet Ali ERAT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Bir yolun highway=residential etiketini highway=living_street olarak değiştirmişsiniz. (iD editörde bir nesneyi seçtiğinizde sol alt köşede o nesnenin etiketlerini görebilirsiniz.) iD editörde yazan şey bazen... commented 2025-10-09 17:01:23 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173059616 (Comments: 2) | Vonter (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello commented 2025-10-09 16:58:02 UTC by Vonter ♦75 |
| 172723788 (Comments: 2) | tartiflex (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, Les clés ref:FR:CDxx font référence aux conseil départementaux, en l'occurrence ici celui de Haute-Savoie (74) pour ref:FR:CD74. Voir ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Liste_des_r... commented 2025-10-09 16:57:04 UTC by tartiflex ♦13 |
| 171841543 (Comments: 6) | ramthelinefeed (Discussed changesets: 47) | What tends to happen elsewhere is that you'd have a superroute for the "named route" (see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16327216 ) which has only relations as components - in my example https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-09 16:54:18 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 134319749 (Comments: 2) | JochenB (Discussed changesets: 61) | Ich vermute eher, es war ein "Einfüge"-Fehler. Statt nur die Tags einzufügen hat es den ganzem Weg eingefügt. Die Shortcuts dind sehr ähnlich. Danke für den Hinweis, habe es gelöscht! commented 2025-10-09 16:53:41 UTC by JochenB ♦95 |
| 172982675 (Comments: 4) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Frage ist halt ob jeder abgesenkte Bordstein auch eine Querungsmöglichkeit ist, viele davon sind ja auch einfach für Ausfahrten vorhanden. Man kann sich ja auch drüber streiten ob man Leute nicht lieber über offizielle Wege schick... commented 2025-10-09 16:36:29 UTC by stirps ♦5 |
| 173055573 (Comments: 1) | KrabbeJ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tip... Gebruik de Quickortho 25 cm Dan zie je alle wegen al liggen. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 16:32:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173057722 (Comments: 1) | torisugari (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-10-09 16:28:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 173055686 (Comments: 1) | KrabbeJ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag KrabbeJ Wanneer deze steraat nog niet opgeleverd is dan beter taggen met highway=construction construction=residential MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 16:25:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173025677 (Comments: 1) | G_Meredith (Discussed changesets: 17) | Have all of those trees actually been cut down? commented 2025-10-09 16:23:02 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 172994489 (Comments: 2) | map per (Discussed changesets: 91) | Good catch, deleted the accidentally uploaded 'tid' value commented 2025-10-09 16:11:00 UTC by map per ♦1,315 |
 | 168465123 (Comments: 3) | angys (Discussed changesets: 104) | what "watson" is? Is it some type of shop? commented 2025-10-09 15:42:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,092 |
| 171046178 (Comments: 1) | HostileSpark (Discussed changesets: 2) | FYI what you see on the City of Calgary MyProperty map is just the former Adelaide Street right-of-way label. The street itself, and portions of 9th and 11th Streets, were demolished 5-6 years ago to accommodate the Green Line LRT, and they are never... commented 2025-10-09 15:35:39 UTC by hoserab ♦206 |
| 169379597 (Comments: 4) | vietnam321 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ok nếu vậy bạn cứ để tên ngõ 102 cho đúng thực tế vậy 👍 commented 2025-10-09 15:03:17 UTC by vietnam321 ♦9 |
| 173041636 (Comments: 1) | Aleksander | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 27) | Skąd ta data 2025-10-20? commented 2025-10-09 14:50:05 UTC by Szymson ♦417 |
| 173050187 (Comments: 1) | Chris van Buijten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-09 14:41:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172915617 (Comments: 9) | xcazin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oui, je n'ai pas précisé, je n'ai jamais commandé de livres sur Amazon, et ce n'est pas parce que je n'ai jamais commandé de livres, même sur internet. Car je passe volontairement par des vraies l... commented 2025-10-09 14:38:33 UTC by trial ♦944 |
| 173040144 (Comments: 1) | Larazo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De dubbel getagde naam heb ik verwijderd MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-09 14:38:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173046462 (Comments: 1) | marktechratp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Le point en question que tu as edit n'est pas le tribunal administratif, c'est la mahkama du pacha. Le tribunal administratif est l'immeuble plus en bas a gauche. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167628017 commented 2025-10-09 14:24:28 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 172160406 (Comments: 4) | berjk (Discussed changesets: 38) | The German name Preßburg was the primary name used for the city until 1919. commented 2025-10-09 14:10:08 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦217 |
| 164927102 (Comments: 3) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 128) | Thing is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery_point seems to be about whether a postal address is a deliverable unit. Not the actual co-ord of mail drop/collect. Adding an amenity=letter_box might help, but then it's separate from th... commented 2025-10-09 14:10:06 UTC by Pink Duck ♦158 |
| 173022892 (Comments: 1) | Bienerer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E&... commented 2025-10-09 13:56:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,039 |
| 167577025 (Comments: 1) | Loshu (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1394995446/history seems to be tagged as a "community_centre=community_hall" which seems odd? Regards, Andy commented 2025-10-09 13:52:29 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173044258 (Comments: 3) | Niklaus Weiss (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thank you for your comment and the constructive discussion. Indeed, not all institutions fall under this category, as certain competencies are vested in federal agencies. However, two of the three branches of democratic authority do. The designation ... commented 2025-10-09 13:45:29 UTC by Niklaus Weiss ♦6 |
| 173042821 (Comments: 3) | Arcas88 (Discussed changesets: 3) | all fixed commented 2025-10-09 13:43:52 UTC by nevw ♦2,049 |
| 173009809 (Comments: 2) | ERU_Mentz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Manuel, für unser barrierefreies Routing verknüpfen wir immer bis an die Steigkante, das steht für den Einstieg in Bus/Bahn/... und unterstützt unser internes Routing. Welches Luftbild ich letztlich im Hintergrund habe, ist ... commented 2025-10-09 13:41:02 UTC by ERU_Mentz ♦3 |
| 173051549 (Comments: 1) | Valario127 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fuente: https://x.com/oscar_puente_/status/1976211397437423719/video/2 commented 2025-10-09 13:32:33 UTC by Valario127 ♦3 |
| 172964135 (Comments: 2) | OttoR (Discussed changesets: 68) | It's work in progress. If it is regardign BGT tags; they will be removed. commented 2025-10-09 13:09:58 UTC by OttoR ♦64 |
| 171125862 (Comments: 5) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 77) | Danke für die Info. Ich denke, wir zwei sind die einzigen Mapper, die da aktiv sind, da sehe ich keinen weiteren Handlungsbedarf. Ansonsten hatte ich Kontakt mit dem Naturpark Wildeshauser Geest. Die haben die fehlenden Knotenpunkt-Einschieber i... commented 2025-10-09 13:06:28 UTC by GerdP ♦2,777 |
| 173040308 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | thank u commented 2025-10-09 12:53:46 UTC by MaciekMma ♦68 |
| 166371284 (Comments: 1) | Tenasuhvari (Discussed changesets: 4) | hi, thanks for contribution! in future please base objects of the buildings not where the roof is situated on the satellite, but where the buildings stands on the ground, otherwise the position will be incorrect like here, where it's obvious it&... commented 2025-10-09 12:52:21 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦350 |
| 173048869 (Comments: 1) | Islingtonian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Det er en rigtig dårlig ide at redigere i et konstruktionsområde med Ortofotos der er 1&1/2 år gamle. commented 2025-10-09 12:42:00 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,709 |
| 173048851 (Comments: 1) | Clínica Veterinária Medcani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-09 12:39:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 167324110 (Comments: 2) | TranslatorPS (Discussed changesets: 23) | Nope. The kb in ref:kb is short for Komunikacja Beskidzka. Thanks for fixing the uppercase ref:KMAL and ref:KMK tags though, I've been meaning to get back to those. commented 2025-10-09 12:32:20 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦37 |
 | 172589760 (Comments: 1) | tezzyyyy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173048479 commented 2025-10-09 12:27:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172586920 (Comments: 1) | tezzyyyy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173048479 commented 2025-10-09 12:27:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172586008 (Comments: 1) | tezzyyyy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173048479 commented 2025-10-09 12:27:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172167234 (Comments: 2) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Tak - ale mają lada chwila ponownie otworzyć 3269Lpo bypassie: https://www.kronikatygodnia.pl/artykul/50010,s17-w-budowie-mieszkancy-gminy-labunie-odcieci-od-swiata-zablokowano-trzy-drogi-naraz commented 2025-10-09 12:15:38 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173036417 (Comments: 1) | kaufmannstylstrup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dit POI har fået adresse defineret som en relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19694046 commented 2025-10-09 12:15:13 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,709 |
| 172842997 (Comments: 1) | qrisztly (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174004696. What is the mean of the tag ref:cvr = 30202503 ? Did you mean ref:DK:cvr? commented 2025-10-09 12:11:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 172918085 (Comments: 2) | GlobEX ONE Cloud (Discussed changesets: 2) | please respond commented 2025-10-09 12:08:28 UTC by Udarian ♦499 |
| 173046536 (Comments: 1) | Katta Saikiran (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Katta Saikiran, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your ... commented 2025-10-09 12:00:38 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,952 |
| 173018755 (Comments: 4) | EdGB91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Don't worry about the dragged nodes, a lot of people do that while they're getting used to the web-based iD editor. It's usually easy to spot and fix. Adding the roads from the developer's map is a problem, becau... commented 2025-10-09 11:46:14 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 163490802 (Comments: 1) | ThomasA (Discussed changesets: 23) | Der er næppe 5 forskellige ladestandere på denne tankstation. Bemærk at der kun bør være en "amenity=charging_station" for hver ladestation med forskellige egenskaber. Hvis der er mere end en stander pr. lades... commented 2025-10-09 11:39:41 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦22 |
| 172539469 (Comments: 2) | McLout (Discussed changesets: 1) | Так звісно. Там під'їзди з різних сторін будинку. commented 2025-10-09 11:38:25 UTC by McLout ♦1 |
| 173016959 (Comments: 3) | grelus (Discussed changesets: 71) | ;o okej, to zdaje sie być istotną barierą, dziekuje za zrozumienie commented 2025-10-09 11:36:59 UTC by Yog Sot ♦317 |
| 173033155 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi. Thank You. But There is still restriction on a stretch of road a few hundred meters immediately after exit 56 direction east. commented 2025-10-09 11:26:23 UTC by akotys ♦1 |
| 172934987 (Comments: 2) | victorelgueta (Discussed changesets: 13) | Entendido, gracias. commented 2025-10-09 11:25:58 UTC by victorelgueta ♦10 |
| 172013926 (Comments: 1) | Jhowie_Nitnek (Discussed changesets: 185) | I gues you meant: type=provides_feature not type=type=provides_feature ;-) commented 2025-10-09 11:15:36 UTC by trial ♦944 |
| 173040936 (Comments: 3) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | You genuinely added lots of details to this area. It is a shame your edits are such a mixture of fake and real features. Othwerise not everything would have needed to be reverted. commented 2025-10-09 11:10:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 173040667 (Comments: 2) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:50 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 173040547 (Comments: 2) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172781132 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172757302 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172740058 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172712777 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172696808 (Comments: 2) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172696573 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172240453 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172151238 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172101177 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172124371 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,444 |
| 172954625 (Comments: 2) | dmfr (Discussed changesets: 21) | It's an error, thank you for letting me know! commented 2025-10-09 10:58:41 UTC by dmfr ♦59 |
| 172999165 (Comments: 1) | Bosin_Time (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1436404663. What is the mean of the tag Объезд Центрального рынка в городе Таганрог = Объезд центрального рынка в город... commented 2025-10-09 10:51:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173034945 (Comments: 3) | ZzMak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, ik reageerde op het verkeerde onderwerp. Ja, zit in het gebouw https://maps.app.goo.gl/zTFve1itoxjfacYA9 Hier zijn ook nog enkele die niet Organics Maps staan. https://m.cityappalmelo.nl/locaties/openbaar-toilet-6374c25a8... commented 2025-10-09 10:48:21 UTC by ZzMak ♦1 |
| 172932204 (Comments: 1) | ฐิติพร การบัญชี (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/1319854424. What is the mean of the tag 8สำนักงานบัญชี? commented 2025-10-09 10:47:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,091 |
| 173033118 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 342) | Adressepunkterne må der ikke ændres på: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser Tilføj evt. en relation som vist her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19693912 commented 2025-10-09 10:46:12 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,709 |
| 172457467 (Comments: 2) | Fasha4 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Są to drogi w planowanym Obwodzie Utrzymania Dróg (OUD), który ma być zbudowany w ramach budowy S11. Źródłem są plany sytuacyjne z koncepcji programowej tej inwestycji. Zrektyfikowana mapa jest dostępna tutaj: https://ma... commented 2025-10-09 10:36:53 UTC by Fasha4 ♦15 |
| 173024123 (Comments: 3) | Enyace (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke das du nochmal rüberschaust, das es dann die shared lane nichtmehr braucht wusste ich noch nicht, in der Bahnhofstraße hast du vollkommen recht, da habe ich nicht bedacht das der Radweg an der Ecke Breite Straße endet. Ich ... commented 2025-10-09 10:28:44 UTC by Enyace ♦2 |
| 173006419 (Comments: 2) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 2) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173042199 commented 2025-10-09 10:23:44 UTC by kingkingHK ♦19 |
| 173041400 (Comments: 1) | Mechowskyy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dodałem również istniejącą nieformalnie część wsi. commented 2025-10-09 10:05:13 UTC by Mechowskyy ♦2 |
| 173024206 (Comments: 2) | Enyace (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin! Seit ungefähr einem Jahr ist die gesamte Straße "Trift" vom thaerplatz bis zum Kreisel eine ausgeschilderte Fahrradstraße, die Schutzstreifen gibt es nichtmehr. Liebe Grüße. --- ... commented 2025-10-09 09:57:58 UTC by Enyace ♦2 |
| 173039713 (Comments: 1) | angdev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da open data Comune di Lecce risulta area cani per sgambamento commented 2025-10-09 09:31:04 UTC by angdev ♦1 |
| 172989517 (Comments: 2) | tmp44 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Cześć, dzięki, poprawię commented 2025-10-09 09:29:37 UTC by tmp44 ♦1 |
| 170791561 (Comments: 1) | Кріц (Discussed changesets: 5) | Доброго дня Уточніть будь ласка, яке джерело даних? commented 2025-10-09 09:26:53 UTC by Monstrofil ♦27 |
| 173007943 (Comments: 2) | Business Rocket (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thank you for your message and your correction. My intention was not to modify the data on an address or a building. A rookie mistake on your platform. Sorry for this rookie error, I'll try to be careful from now on. My g... commented 2025-10-09 09:24:48 UTC by Business Rocket ♦1 |
| 163577609 (Comments: 3) | Đuro Jiří (Discussed changesets: 83) | ok, merci je n'avais pas vu le _ee de streetcomplete et je viens de voir ta pratique, j'aurais pu me douter ! encore merci du retour ! bonne journée commented 2025-10-09 09:12:14 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,262 |
| 172962761 (Comments: 4) | rui228 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Ok. Understood. commented 2025-10-09 09:07:57 UTC by rui228 ♦32 |
| 172948741 (Comments: 1) | ludopera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ludovic, Attention à bien utiliser les valeurs suggérées par l'outil pour le renseignement de l'essence. Ex avec l'objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12612653157#map=19/45.154959/5.727544 o&ugrav... commented 2025-10-09 09:03:22 UTC by SIG Echirolles ♦5 |
| 173012044 (Comments: 1) | jlov3001 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Dag jlov. Het is verder goed gegaan. Je historic=monument het ik omgetagd naar =memorial. Een monument is bv de Tajmahal in India. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 09:03:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 173036150 (Comments: 1) | julessgds (Discussed changesets: 7) | 👋 vu :) commented 2025-10-09 08:45:13 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,262 |
| 173037527 (Comments: 1) | Ula | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 14) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-10-09 08:41:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 169945863 (Comments: 1) | sgrubsmyon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Auf den neuen Luftboldern ist hier ein Gebäude zu erkennen! commented 2025-10-09 08:37:54 UTC by redrace ♦161 |
| 173025950 (Comments: 1) | OlgaDm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Доброго дня, прохання якщо редагуєте адреси, вносьте зміни згідно останього вікі osm.wiki/Uk:Адреси де адреси з 1А, 3Б потрібно писати 1-А, 3-Б. Дя... commented 2025-10-09 08:27:43 UTC by kamasytrix ♦43 |
| 161328311 (Comments: 2) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 150) | Bij "retired year" staat er 2024 met een bron, die bron is een tabel van de FOD Economie die zegt dat deze generator definitief buiten dienst gesteld is. Geen idee wat dat betekent voor de situatie op het terrein. commented 2025-10-09 08:23:18 UTC by M!dgard ♦804 |
| 173037273 (Comments: 1) | Brindemort (Discussed changesets: 1) | Piccola specifica; StreetView è aggiornato solo nella parte inferiore della piazza! commented 2025-10-09 08:22:24 UTC by Brindemort ♦1 |
| 172768981 (Comments: 2) | even666 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hab die fehlerhafte Info erst einmal entfernt. Wenn du weißt, wie viele Etagen das Gebäude hat, sag Bescheid oder trag es gerne selber ein. commented 2025-10-09 08:17:06 UTC by söm4324 ♦48 |
| 173033217 (Comments: 1) | Arabika99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie usuwaj faktycznie istniejących dróg - jeżeli jest to droga prywatna, dodaj znacznik "access=private". commented 2025-10-09 08:10:07 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173000917 (Comments: 2) | nona mostafa (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thanks for sharing that with us. Feel free to revert it commented 2025-10-09 08:05:34 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 172932308 (Comments: 4) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks ilias_ for fixed them!! commented 2025-10-09 07:57:13 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 171231872 (Comments: 1) | kiwichickenmusician (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-10-09 07:50:06 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172327133 (Comments: 1) | kiwichickenmusician (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-10-09 07:49:54 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173034874 (Comments: 1) | kiwichickenmusician (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-10-09 07:49:42 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172954397 (Comments: 2) | Anastasia Kourou (Discussed changesets: 1) | the official business address is 176b Westbourne Grove you can see the offical website https://www.paolita.co.uk/contact/ commented 2025-10-09 07:35:34 UTC by Anastasia Kourou ♦1 |
| 173033983 (Comments: 3) | ZzMak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rabobank verplaatst naar ander gebouw. Adresnode De Werf hersteld . commented 2025-10-09 07:27:17 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 171572501 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 368) | Please make sure that we just call these driveways instead of service roads, even though service roads are the same thing, it's just better to call them driveways. Thank you commented 2025-10-09 07:24:01 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦3 |
| 172948625 (Comments: 1) | Raphael Z-IoT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Raphael, der Weg war auch vor Deiner Änderung für Fahrräder freigegeben. Es ist ein normaler Track, bei dem kein explizites Verbot für Fahrräder eingetragen ist. Deine Änderung ist daher eigentlich überf... commented 2025-10-09 07:06:41 UTC by disc24 ♦30 |
| X | 172041688 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 368) | Please check this CS as you have mapped a service road inside a shopping mall? commented 2025-10-09 07:06:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173030470 (Comments: 2) | Arcas88 (Discussed changesets: 3) | All fixed now to changeset 16 commented 2025-10-09 06:56:54 UTC by nevw ♦2,049 |
| 173023294 (Comments: 4) | Groenev (Discussed changesets: 1) | De opmerking in Zweden kan wellicht beter in het Zweeds of Engels. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4996786#map=14/55.84397/13.57730 MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 06:46:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 149321992 (Comments: 2) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 67) | Ja - ist es - siehe auch mapillary. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.89651939999996&lng=8.365727800000059&z=19.24339938691478&pKey=664199622969082&focus=photo&x=0.8048422863400213&y=0.39990255208536696&zoom=0 |
| 170807581 (Comments: 7) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | I've already stated my concerns and objections to their removal; please read above to find them. Thanks. commented 2025-10-09 06:40:23 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 172779881 (Comments: 1) | Carpaticum (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-09 06:35:33 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173033052 (Comments: 1) | Carpaticum (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-09 06:35:25 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172041468 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 368) | Removed roads going through the west City Mall; it is entirely impossible to label parking aisles going through a parking garage, hence why the whole thing has just been tagged as multi-story. Thanks. commented 2025-10-09 06:32:25 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦3 |
| 173022775 (Comments: 2) | Sjoerd3847859 (Discussed changesets: 2) | De omgeving heb ik aangepast naar de actuele situatie. Voor nu even brug toegevoegd en het woonerf aangepast naar residential. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.59621,6.106768,19/?datastrip=20250914_PNEO-04 commented 2025-10-09 06:26:25 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 167117452 (Comments: 1) | NicoSa (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo NicoSa, kannst du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272567859/history nochmal anschauen. Wie kann der Weg für Fußverkehr nur conditional sein aber für Radverkehr offen, sogar designated? VG commented 2025-10-09 06:17:50 UTC by tordans ♦420 |
| 163900605 (Comments: 1) | nao000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:地物ひとつにOSM要素はひとつ commented 2025-10-09 06:17:24 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦26 |
| 172891160 (Comments: 4) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 9) | ok. Not all modules are working for me today((.thanks for the corrections commented 2025-10-09 06:13:50 UTC by kosmgeolan ♦6 |
| 173022888 (Comments: 1) | Sjoerd3847859 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Soerd.... Een naam, extra eigenschappen kunnen wel, maar er horen geen adresgegevens op de gebouwomtrek. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 06:08:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,970 |
| 172990698 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 13) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-09 05:54:35 UTC by rboda ♦3 |
| 172445706 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 13) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-09 05:54:07 UTC by rboda ♦3 |
| 172446805 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-09 05:53:24 UTC by rboda ♦3 |
| 172692525 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour, Attention, même avec JOSM, certaines modifications inversent l'ordre des ways dans une partie de relation. C'est le cas pour la relation r7091938. Pouvez-vous corriger ? Marc commented 2025-10-09 05:49:43 UTC by mga_geo ♦263 |
| 172957326 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956561 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956699 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956720 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956894 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956980 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957143 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957206 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957400 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957575 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957842 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956128 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956478 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955802 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956495 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956007 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955852 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955263 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955306 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955198 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955503 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955586 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955689 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955444 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955730 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955408 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955377 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955349 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954998 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954954 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954851 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955159 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954825 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954747 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954795 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954228 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172953712 (Comments: 4) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954364 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954531 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954559 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954585 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954602 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173023937 (Comments: 2) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo, meines Wissens nach habe ich via Osmose Seite Schreibweisen von der Region Oberbayern angepasst wo es eine Fehlermeldung gab. Ich ändere es wieder. commented 2025-10-09 05:11:02 UTC by Michael Spitzenberger ♦4 |
| 172984094 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 13) | Can you explain what you are trying to do? Mass deletions, and dragged points. commented 2025-10-09 04:21:38 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,618 |
| 172943151 (Comments: 1) | DesertTrip (Discussed changesets: 2) | I am confused as to why the original three homes, (that were the subject of several news articles in 1908 as the three original historic homes in the development) were expanded to include two homes built MANY years later that are not historic at all ... commented 2025-10-09 03:54:13 UTC by DesertTrip ♦2 |
| 172254974 (Comments: 3) | DDD丶Samuel (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for your suggestions! At present, only comprehensive inspection trains have been put into service on the Guangzhou-Zhanjiang High-Speed Railway. Once the official opening date is determined and passenger trains start operating, These inform... commented 2025-10-09 03:45:56 UTC by DDD丶Samuel ♦11 |
| 172982407 (Comments: 1) | ParmaCanal (Discussed changesets: 4) | Que crees que haces nisiquiera eres de este pueblo para estar editando si no sabes no edites commented 2025-10-09 02:36:38 UTC by Novelgomez ♦2 |
| 172946415 (Comments: 1) | JuuuuuuRu (Discussed changesets: 1) | 不好意思，你好像把整棟住宅建築改成獸醫院。還是這真得是佔24層樓的大型獸醫院？ --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172946415 commented 2025-10-09 02:34:00 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,505 |
| 172037804 (Comments: 17) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 11) | Since the previous geometry which drew from aerial imagery better follows the median of the two traces, I would like to restore it. What do you think? commented 2025-10-09 02:27:30 UTC by ZLima12 ♦262 |
| 172942359 (Comments: 2) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 9) | Хорошо, спасибо за информацию. Соглашусь с Вами commented 2025-10-09 01:42:02 UTC by kosmgeolan ♦6 |
| 172881152 (Comments: 2) | lowbattery001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you so much for fixing that! I was using OSM on a mobile browser like a fool. :/ commented 2025-10-09 01:14:17 UTC by lowbattery001 ♦1 |
| 172899243 (Comments: 5) | Mercanto123 (Discussed changesets: 17) | jest, skoro ludzie wydeptali, co widac również na różnych ortomapach, ale nie masz wprawionego oka tak w mojej opinii. commented 2025-10-09 00:58:11 UTC by Yog Sot ♦317 |
| 167818665 (Comments: 1) | Charter7124 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nothing there commented 2025-10-09 00:57:19 UTC by af1312 ♦2 |
| 171591725 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 11) | Apparently we also delete the correct building=yes tag of Chilton House and replace it with landuse=residential. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173027549 commented 2025-10-09 00:50:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 173023135 (Comments: 1) | stevethomp (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please be careful with golf course edits. You set obvious fairways as "rough" or "green" instead of properly setting them to "fairway". Thanks. commented 2025-10-09 00:44:45 UTC by b-jazz ♦737 |
| 171592381 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 11) | Has 99 Bikes moved or closed? Your changeset deleted it, but the comment makes no reference to this. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12878802190/history commented 2025-10-09 00:43:59 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 172357873 (Comments: 4) | CanopyFalls (Discussed changesets: 1) | That would be my guess. These cycle routes like NCN67 seem a little pointless. They often just kick cyclists out into roads with little to no notice and I don't know if it's worth actually keeping them mapped. This one here doesn't eve... commented 2025-10-09 00:39:04 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦1 |
 | 172917709 (Comments: 2) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 31) | file and start editing commented 2025-10-09 00:33:11 UTC by Allroads ♦435 |
| 170571716 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 11) | By deleting the highway=* tag, unfortunately you have effectively made this path invisible to data consumers, including renderers and routing software. The footway=* tag only really makes sense when combined with highway=footway (or similar), see the... commented 2025-10-09 00:30:05 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 173027152 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Literówka w nazwie nowej ulicy, naprawiłem commented 2025-10-09 00:25:04 UTC by syntex ♦881 |
| 172975668 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 11) | Gates and other barrier nodes shouldn't generally be mapped at intersection nodes. Although the sidewalk way is badly aligned, I doubt that anyone walking along the pavement of Harlington Road West between Clymping Dene and Hounslow Road has to ... commented 2025-10-09 00:13:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 136978218 (Comments: 1) | atika nubla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not copy and paste features unless they truly have the same shape. commented 2025-10-09 00:06:07 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 77777507 (Comments: 1) | Nurmianti (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't copy and paste features, unless they truly have the same shape. commented 2025-10-09 00:03:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173025916 (Comments: 1) | BTC DENTAL (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted your addition of a business and bitcoin tags to a roadway. Please add the dental practice details to the building you operate from instead. commented 2025-10-09 00:00:48 UTC by nevw ♦2,049 |
| 172713371 (Comments: 1) | Olivia A Gordy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please take care when mapping beyond task boundaries in an active project; it seems like you added some duplicate building footprints due to this. don't worry I resolved them. commented 2025-10-08 23:56:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 172975342 (Comments: 1) | Clitheroe Warrior (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-08 23:53:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173025723 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Tu l'as déjà ajoutée en tant que point, pas besoin de la rajouter une deuxième fois en tant que area commented 2025-10-08 23:41:31 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 172698964 (Comments: 3) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Спасибо. Произошло недопонимание мной поставленной задачи, поэтому Вы правы, этим объектам тут не место и их следует удалить и не наноси... commented 2025-10-08 23:37:07 UTC by ReiT ♦1 |
| 172936991 (Comments: 1) | mupoozry (Discussed changesets: 3) | Would service=alley also apply to these roads? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley commented 2025-10-08 23:31:59 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,637 |
| 172994586 (Comments: 1) | M_Kucha (Discussed changesets: 82) | Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173026515 commented 2025-10-08 23:30:25 UTC by Bienson ♦331 |
| 173025669 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 190) | cambios a partir del lunes en la 707 y 333 aqui te paso https://www.quepasaweb.com.ar/las-lineas-707-y-333-modifican-sus-recorridos-a-partir-del-lunes/ commented 2025-10-08 23:22:50 UTC by i2004 ♦161 |
| 173025618 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Mais arrête de mettre des tags au hasard?? Pourquoi tu mets source=kaat ground survey?? T'es avec la team Kaart?? Tu sais ce que ça veut dire au moins? commented 2025-10-08 23:19:52 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 77182489 (Comments: 1) | diahputri (Discussed changesets: 2) | [ENG] Hi, I see it's been a while since you mapped this, but did you actually know that the buildings you mapped in this area are houses or were you just using aerial imagery? You enveloped multiple buildings in individual footprints, so I'... commented 2025-10-08 23:17:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 141459525 (Comments: 1) | Herr_Baer (Discussed changesets: 1) | In der Gewässerdatenbank des Landesanglerverbandes Brandenburg wird dieses Gewässer geführt als Kiessee bei Leegebruch mit der Gewässernummer: P 14-117. Siehe hier: https://www.lavb.de/gwsmaps/ oder hier: https://www.alleang... commented 2025-10-08 22:59:49 UTC by Peter Maiwald ♦7 |
| 173020404 (Comments: 1) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 165) | skoro `lane_markings=no` to po co tag `lanes` ? commented 2025-10-08 22:51:37 UTC by Yog Sot ♦317 |
| 173024795 (Comments: 1) | Yankovski (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-08 22:41:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,634 |
| 173020813 (Comments: 2) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | C pas moi j'essaie de le changer commented 2025-10-08 22:28:02 UTC by Hdidanox ♦3 |
| 173025176 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Kool smoothie est un fast food, pas un restaurant. Encore une fois merci de te renseigner sur comment utiliser OSM avant de faire tes edits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta... commented 2025-10-08 22:27:40 UTC by ilias_ ♦310 |
| 172274864 (Comments: 1) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 956) | Bonjour, j'ai remis le tag Voie de bus, je rappelle que ce n'est pas une bonne pratique de tag dans le but explicite d'influencer le rendu ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Taguer_pour_le_rendu ) C'est à la co... commented 2025-10-08 21:59:20 UTC by JigAma ♦8 |