| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 170851088 (Comments: 2) | thewildbirdhunter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Workin on it now commented 2025-08-24 19:32:17 UTC by thewildbirdhunter ♦1 |
| 170935520 (Comments: 2) | hwierzbicki (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi silversurfer! Per the wiki, every tennis court should be individually tagged and ideally the entire pitch (with fence) should be tagged as a recreation ground. --- "Draw the area of every single tennis court and add leisu... commented 2025-08-24 19:29:38 UTC by hwierzbicki ♦15 |
 | 170938311 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-24 19:29:30 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦122 |
 | 170696838 (Comments: 12) | mod22 (Discussed changesets: 6) | >If that is the reason for the change, then you should adapt your app to get along with the data as mapped in OSM, not the other way around. Sure, this approach is more than routine to us by now. That being said, if we detect some clear inc... commented 2025-08-24 19:28:21 UTC by mod22 ♦5 |
 | 170875522 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 336) | Jeg spørger igen, hvad er dit workflow? Du skaber altså mange problemer med den måde du flytter alle husene i et område med kun et par centimeter. Jeg tror jeg forstår hvorfor så mange huse, umiddelbart ur... commented 2025-08-24 19:26:27 UTC by drkt ♦42 |
 | 169253396 (Comments: 3) | aurekosc (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, j'ai fait de mon mieux sur cette base, merci. commented 2025-08-24 19:18:46 UTC by StC ♦310 |
| 167495408 (Comments: 1) | Hyebone (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Hyebone, I was doing some QA using osmose and I noticed that this changeset caused some warnings about buildings being inside other buildings. Which parts would you consider separate buildings, and which should be parts of a build... commented 2025-08-24 19:18:04 UTC by thebrad1111 ♦12 |
 | 109671914 (Comments: 1) | Jhowie_Nitnek (Discussed changesets: 183) | dag Jhowie, ik laat u antwoorden op deze note > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4927577 commented 2025-08-24 19:17:12 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦251 |
 | 170869117 (Comments: 19) | martin hamel (Discussed changesets: 7) | Excellent! Bonne fin de semaine! commented 2025-08-24 19:16:10 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦382 |
 | 170940886 (Comments: 1) | cayenne11 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Danke --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170940886 commented 2025-08-24 19:11:13 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 169890118 (Comments: 3) | AlesKubr (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, by a (fairly long) process of trials and errors we have collectively determined that the only way to manage routes with "leaves and stems" (that is, which double back on themselves) is to rely on relation ordering and to have eve... commented 2025-08-24 19:08:06 UTC by StC ♦310 |
| 170887242 (Comments: 4) | ddm-dolomitico (Discussed changesets: 14) | Michele, grazie anche in questo caso della segnalazione. Domani o al più martedì vedo quello che ho combinato e sistemo/ripristino le relazioni. commented 2025-08-24 19:00:55 UTC by ddm-dolomitico ♦15 |
| 170913883 (Comments: 1) | DrFlexer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Avending%3Dgas Das "Gebäude" würde ich aber noch entfernen und statt einem Node die gesamten Informationen auf den Umriss ziehen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-24 18:52:01 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
 | 170315500 (Comments: 1) | AnnaCatarina (Discussed changesets: 22) | Revierto tu cambio de `usage=industrial` a las Líneas TS, SH y H. Estas vías son de camino, así que deben llevar `usage=main` o `usage=branch`. Ya no usamos `usage=industrial` pues es redundante (ya tenemos `service=spur`). commented 2025-08-24 18:48:54 UTC by Ferrocarriles de México ♦47 |
| 162284133 (Comments: 1) | gallseife (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi :) Railway:ref ist für die Ril 100-Abkürzung und nicht für die Stellwerksart gedacht :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:railway:ref?uselang=de commented 2025-08-24 18:45:43 UTC by 351293 ♦89 |
| 162213358 (Comments: 2) | 351293 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi, ja genau, die Fulda-Limburg muss jetzt über die Weichen zum Hausbahnsteig. Legst Du das um? LG commented 2025-08-24 18:42:41 UTC by 351293 ♦89 |
 | 170774840 (Comments: 1) | GravelTrip (Discussed changesets: 1) | Co to za głupoty? Przejście dla zwierząt nie służy do ruchu pieszego. Wchodząc tam zostawiasz swój zapach i odstraszasz zwierzęta, które właśnie mają się przyzwyczaić do migracji przez to właśnie przejście. commented 2025-08-24 18:38:25 UTC by Szymson ♦389 |
| 170906251 (Comments: 3) | circle61815971 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nan tkt! c'est super stylé ce que tu fais ! Et pas de problème de le faire en 2 temps. commented 2025-08-24 18:37:25 UTC by XioNoX ♦25 |
 | 170893757 (Comments: 3) | René Stout (Discussed changesets: 8) | René is heb die woonerven verwijderd en er toegangfswegen voor parkeerplaatsen van gemaakt. access=private toegevoegd aan de parking zelf. Groet eggie commented 2025-08-24 18:30:12 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 170248053 (Comments: 1) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 16) | In this changeset, you changed an apartment building into residential landuse. I am not sure what you were trying to change here, but I have reverted this for now as it seems to be a building according to aerial and cadaster data. commented 2025-08-24 18:29:54 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 170893837 (Comments: 2) | René Stout (Discussed changesets: 8) | Het is nu aangepast naar voetpad. commented 2025-08-24 18:29:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 170895461 (Comments: 1) | melo_1 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Salut,potiraspunde la mesajul meu te rog? commented 2025-08-24 18:28:07 UTC by CONTAN ♦2 |
| 170935016 (Comments: 2) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 27) | Happy to help out, I noticed a couple other paths nearby that I added to the map. They looked like user generated trails/social trails so I added them as informal paths. If these are official trails, they could be changed from informal path to foot p... commented 2025-08-24 18:21:12 UTC by dannmer ♦26 |
| 170918556 (Comments: 9) | Fryderyk Przybycin (Discussed changesets: 7) | Widzę że na stronie GraphHoppera bezpośrednio jest opcję wyznaczania trasy dla szosówki, co więcej zdaje się działać sensownie, bo omija ten fragment i prowadzi przez osiedle: https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=50.322668%2C18.71541... commented 2025-08-24 18:15:50 UTC by dzamper ♦134 |
| 170896024 (Comments: 2) | Paolitosss (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ah ok scusami, sinceramente su Vespucci non ci ho mai fatto caso al commento dei changeset, su id di solito qualcosa scrivo, scriveró anche qui. Grazie per l'info! commented 2025-08-24 18:10:30 UTC by Paolitosss ♦8 |
| 170717297 (Comments: 4) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 45) | Wycofałem po sobie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170939250 commented 2025-08-24 18:08:50 UTC by dzamper ♦134 |
| 142716732 (Comments: 1) | Mevess (Discussed changesets: 25) | Bonjour, Sentier du Castor c'est vraiment le nom du sentier ou c'est plutôt celui d'un itinéraire ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617587697/history commented 2025-08-24 18:05:04 UTC by pyrog ♦357 |
| 170500193 (Comments: 1) | Emils Mikelsons (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sveiki, Nosaukumus tulkot nevajadzētu, ja tie nav oficiāli nosaukumi. OSM nenorāda tulkojumus, bet jau esošus nosaukumus (kas var būt tulkoti, bet tos mēs netulkojam paši). Piemēram, tūrisma mājas lapā vai uz informācij... commented 2025-08-24 18:03:35 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 170796953 (Comments: 3) | dendreier (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ok danke für die Hinweise. Ursprünglich habe ich nur die oberfläche von Weg 244321256 korrigiert. Im Anschluss jedoch eine Meldung im Review erhalten die mich dazu gebracht hat den Access zu definieren. Wenn das Unsinn war bitte ko... commented 2025-08-24 18:02:54 UTC by dendreier ♦3 |
 | 168502634 (Comments: 1) | sourserg (Discussed changesets: 1) | You changed the name of the way to indicate the difficulty, I do not think that this should be done. The difficulty of the via ferrata is given in the key via_ferrata_scale=* (here, only on one of the ways of the relation because the others are just ... commented 2025-08-24 17:54:48 UTC by DerMusikkritiker ♦2 |
| 170937689 (Comments: 1) | cayenne11 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi :) ich sehe, dass du hier vor ein paar Jahre den node von cellar_entrance zu historic building geändert hast. Damit bin ich nicht ganz einverstanden, da es für mich so aussieht als hätte Jo_Cassel damals ganz korrekt den Eing... commented 2025-08-24 17:49:58 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 170937434 (Comments: 1) | Desus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please move the node of the security camera to right or left side of the street. commented 2025-08-24 17:47:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170926300 (Comments: 1) | 7beren (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag 7beren.... Lijkt me oke, maar name=Hub hoort er niet op. (of het moet echt een naam Hub hebben? We taggen bv ook niet name=bankje name=brievenbus. name=grasveldje Mapse, eggie commented 2025-08-24 17:47:18 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 170935419 (Comments: 1) | Nassau Rudy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted due to prohibited source, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google commented 2025-08-24 17:44:53 UTC by InsertUser ♦452 |
| 170518604 (Comments: 1) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 16) | You added a fence here instead of what I assume is a driveway. This breaks routing for the road and footway that are now crossing a fence, so please be more careful. commented 2025-08-24 17:44:02 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 170928726 (Comments: 1) | Nassau Rudy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted due to prohibited source and duplication of existing ways. commented 2025-08-24 17:42:15 UTC by InsertUser ♦452 |
| 11161388 (Comments: 1) | elmuSSo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Czym są dodane tu ruiny? commented 2025-08-24 17:41:22 UTC by Maciej9 ♦34 |
| 170539236 (Comments: 1) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 16) | I have reverted this edit because it added a large amount of invalid fords breaking routing along all these roads. Please review your edits before adding so many features that don't exist. commented 2025-08-24 17:37:51 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 170937739 (Comments: 1) | FeetAndInches (Discussed changesets: 7) | Apparently RapiD also truncates changeset comments instead of warning you about the character limit :( Added addresses to the duplexes on Algonquin and Amelia Drives in Cedar Falls, IA. Each building shares a single house number, and each unit... commented 2025-08-24 17:35:22 UTC by FeetAndInches ♦10 |
| 170590542 (Comments: 1) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please actually fix issues with the roads that you add using Rapid, which is your responsibility if using semi-automated tools. You left the road with an incorrect layer value, overlapping buildings, overlapping a wall, impossible geometry, misaligne... commented 2025-08-24 17:29:13 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 170808324 (Comments: 3) | Jimmyisawkward (Discussed changesets: 5) | Not sure if tagging of wooded areas has been discussed, but it would be good to bring it up on Slack. commented 2025-08-24 17:28:00 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170685818 (Comments: 1) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Can you please elaborate on your edits here? What is this ditch that flows uphill and connects to trenches https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423368941 ? Why are there ditch culvert between trenches like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423368945 ,... commented 2025-08-24 17:19:40 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 170936208 (Comments: 2) | Parowiec Świecący (Discussed changesets: 3) | Poprawione. commented 2025-08-24 17:18:21 UTC by Parowiec Świecący ♦1 |
| 163420986 (Comments: 1) | Alec Coates (Discussed changesets: 7) | Alec, I'm honestly not picking on your edits, but I'm changing the alley behind Stowell Street back to `highway=service` and adding `service=alley`. I was going past this today, and it is a horrible skanky alleyway and no way a `highway=ped... commented 2025-08-24 17:13:45 UTC by phodgkin ♦64 |
| 170931337 (Comments: 1) | Jakob48 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Comment is wrong, should be: Naturflächen, Wege in ehemaliger Kiesgrube im Wald "Hirschbrunnen". Sri. commented 2025-08-24 17:00:41 UTC by Jakob48 ♦67 |
 | 170894253 (Comments: 3) | Rabina Poudyal (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thankyou so much for your correction!! I will take care of this while mapping from now commented 2025-08-24 16:59:09 UTC by Rabina Poudyal ♦1 |
| 170933845 (Comments: 2) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 45) | No z tą nawierzchnią i grade to trochę ciężko, bo zwłaszcza w tej części gliwickiej te ścieżki to takie niewiadomo co. Czasem lekko żwirowa ścieżka przez runo a czasem goła ziemia wyjeżdżona do gładkiego tak że ciężko nawet okreś... commented 2025-08-24 16:51:03 UTC by dzamper ♦134 |
| 170786373 (Comments: 1) | Torators (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sveiki, Latvijā mazciemus OSM apzīmē ar `place=hamlet` (nevis ar `place=village`, kas ir "pilnie" ciemi ar VZD robežām). Es izlaboju. Ņem vērā, ka Wikidata un citi avoti var būt novecojuši/nepareizi. Pilni VZD dati ir... commented 2025-08-24 16:39:26 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 170912787 (Comments: 2) | deltapir (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao, ho notato anche io questo changeset senza descrizione. Mi unisco alle richieste di chi mi ha preceduto, con le quali sono assolutamente d'accordo. Grazie per la tua collaborazione ! 👍 commented 2025-08-24 16:33:51 UTC by dp7 ♦32 |
| 35713259 (Comments: 2) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 45) | Raczej wszystko co płynie to w kierunku południowo-zachodnim, na odległość można to zobaczyć na izohipsach na stylach rowerowych na przykład commented 2025-08-24 16:31:28 UTC by dzamper ♦134 |
| 170925599 (Comments: 1) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, How do you know in this changeset and others that these are fords, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13094512758 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13094512977 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13094512859 and others ? They... commented 2025-08-24 16:30:31 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 120194486 (Comments: 1) | antpriv (Discussed changesets: 17) | What is the source of this data? Tagging is not correct: should be highway=proposed + proposed=trunk/motorway/... commented 2025-08-24 16:30:23 UTC by voschix ♦184 |
| 170924272 (Comments: 1) | Patch86UK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi PatchUK, are you sure this section is two-way? Upon surveying on 16 Aug, I found no entry signs at the bottom (see photo https://photos.app.goo.gl/dChxeqWjV1CnfvFr7) Combined with what's been said in the newsletters etc, this seems one-way, u... commented 2025-08-24 16:29:05 UTC by swinetown ♦27 |
| 170584531 (Comments: 1) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 56) | Super bedankt voor het toevoegen/aanvullen van die afvalcontainers. Ik vind het altijd vervelend om uit te zoeken welke tags ik nou moet gebruiken. Die bij de Oude Dreef wilde ik al een tijdje doen maar had er nog geen tijd voor gehad. commented 2025-08-24 16:25:43 UTC by lipuma ♦177 |
| 161928504 (Comments: 3) | sudo_man (Discussed changesets: 15) | J'ai finalement vérifié, c'est bien "Chemin de la Béraudière" sur place. commented 2025-08-24 16:19:13 UTC by Syl ♦980 |
| 169153695 (Comments: 2) | lorisobi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tja also vermerkt ist "kein Trinkwasser" nirgendwo - ich habe dementsprechend mal den drinking_water:legal auf yes gestellt, was die rechtliche Situation abbildet und die allgemeine Einschätzung drinking_water auf conditional, da die r... commented 2025-08-24 16:18:35 UTC by lorisobi ♦2 |
| 168881734 (Comments: 1) | VELODB (Discussed changesets: 22) | Bonjour VELODB, Je suis un petit peu surpris par la modification du panneau Côta Bella https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9935836466. On ne met (généralement) pas l'altitude dans le nom d'un poteau indicateur. Eta... commented 2025-08-24 16:12:27 UTC by Patchi ♦132 |
| 170565610 (Comments: 1) | Benoit84 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour Benoit84, Je ne suis pas tout à fait d'accord avec cette modification car on devrait indiquer ce qu'il y a sur le terrain. Or le nom du panneau "Les Fébrier" est bien indiqué sans 's' ... commented 2025-08-24 16:05:16 UTC by Patchi ♦132 |
| 163386990 (Comments: 1) | Ferrocarriles de México (Discussed changesets: 21) | El Boulevard Portuario no pertenece a los Ejes de Transporte, como se puede consultar en https://datosviales2020.routedev.mx/main En https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos Se indica que las vias "Trunk" ... commented 2025-08-24 16:04:05 UTC by ferog_v ♦24 |
| 170926978 (Comments: 1) | paj26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There is works access through the gate, so the access tag would be private rather than no. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-08-24 16:01:01 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,896 |
| 170933011 (Comments: 1) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wat er niet meer is kan uiteraard weg. Aan die willekeurige bosvormen heb je nog wel even werk zie ik. Mapse eggie commented 2025-08-24 15:59:32 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170931718 (Comments: 3) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hier kun je je vraag kwijt https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/150 commented 2025-08-24 15:56:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 124626513 (Comments: 1) | Matus_M (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapycom user report #2924818 - "nie Prehrštie, ale správne Priehrštie" Zdravím, neviete náhodou odkiaľ je vlastne ten názov? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5657427898/history/3 Nemalo by to po... commented 2025-08-24 15:56:06 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦27 |
| 170925298 (Comments: 5) | BlauweFietsKetting (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wanneer er geen bebording is dan highway=path. Dat tracktype kan dan nog wel, want dat wordt niet alleen meer voor tracks gebruikt. Een highway=path routeert ook voor fietsers. Mag je er niet fietsen dan bicycle=no (We doen ook wel vehicle=no, m... commented 2025-08-24 15:39:47 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170929998 (Comments: 1) | jurgenwh (Discussed changesets: 6) | heritage=2 hersteld... Gebouw fietsenstalling hersteld. Wanneer je iets niet begrijpt niet zomaar zaken verwijderen. Vraag het desnoods even op het forum. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-24 15:27:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 170565531 (Comments: 2) | Larmax (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi, It was supposed to be name=Askholm, but mueschel seems to have fixed it already. commented 2025-08-24 15:13:43 UTC by Larmax ♦284 |
| 170929939 (Comments: 1) | Kris74M (Discussed changesets: 59) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2560873130 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-08-24 15:10:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170907332 (Comments: 1) | Wycich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wieś ta jest już dodana do mapy jako osobny punkt, nie ma potrzeby dublowania danych commented 2025-08-24 15:07:26 UTC by bartgron ♦217 |
| 170928921 (Comments: 2) | jurgenwh (Discussed changesets: 6) | In dit draadje om import vragen. name= heb ik aangepast naar note=.. commented 2025-08-24 15:01:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 170929765 (Comments: 1) | Maruh24 (Discussed changesets: 3) | the locations of some this 70-1 bus route stops were tracked and added in this route library/platform/web https://wikiroutes.info/en/hochiminh-city?routes=81519 ; the official names of some bus stops you could find them in https://smart.tayninh.gov.v... commented 2025-08-24 15:01:08 UTC by Maruh24 ♦3 |
| 170924922 (Comments: 6) | 7Bee (Discussed changesets: 9) | 37-38 klopte ook niet helemaal en die ook hersteld commented 2025-08-24 14:59:02 UTC by dvdhoven ♦937 |
| 170904368 (Comments: 1) | Sophie Middleton_GB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579582322 is really a guest house and not just an occasional short term let? I didn't notice a guest house here the last time I walked past. commented 2025-08-24 14:54:15 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,412 |
| 170928487 (Comments: 1) | jbohmdk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Source is local knowledge and signage, something in the UI tripped me up and completed the changeset submission halfway through tagging the changeset. commented 2025-08-24 14:49:51 UTC by jbohmdk ♦7 |
| 170925345 (Comments: 1) | 7Bee (Discussed changesets: 9) | De LF route heb ik opnieuw gesorteerd commented 2025-08-24 14:46:25 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170758413 (Comments: 5) | Schnerrget (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich habe es geändert. commented 2025-08-24 14:46:03 UTC by Lokai ♦473 |
 | 170780242 (Comments: 1) | artzera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset introduced bunch of problems. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170928628 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170928589 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170928574 commented 2025-08-24 14:38:59 UTC by sahilister ♦31 |
 | 170880638 (Comments: 4) | Şafak05 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, "Հայրակ" adlandırması fonetik açıdan yerelleştirme ise bir yanlışlık göremiyorum. Fakat tarihteki başka bir yerleşimi referans gösteriyorsa incelenmelidir keza ermenice wikipedia bağlantısı, kendi... commented 2025-08-24 14:32:17 UTC by Şafak05 ♦1 |
| 170891609 (Comments: 3) | Carl Nowack (Discussed changesets: 6) | In Quebec, sidewalks are forbidden to cyclists by law. Adding bicycel=permissive would be reverted because of this. There is a discussion to convert all of the Quebec sidewalks into bicycle=dismount, but it is still waiting for a consensus: https://... commented 2025-08-24 14:32:01 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦382 |
| 138687520 (Comments: 1) | IreuN (Discussed changesets: 72) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254167442#map=19/50.289554/19.112335&layers=N Te ścieżki jeśli nie są przy drodze specjalnie tagujemy jako path. Po highway=footway znak c-16 nie można poruszać się rowerem. https://wiki.openstr... commented 2025-08-24 14:13:36 UTC by olo81 ♦685 |
| 170744518 (Comments: 4) | Beakerboy (Discussed changesets: 5) | It is not a popular climb. In fact it might be private land so they may have been trespassing. I plan on kayaking so I could photo the tower as well as the area with the GNIS coordinates to prove that the “impressive tower” is where I see... commented 2025-08-24 13:55:47 UTC by Beakerboy ♦4 |
| 170882007 (Comments: 1) | FrankOverman (Discussed changesets: 79) | Lig jij nu voor op de kaart van de gemeente? https://kaart.tilburg.nl/betaald-parkeren commented 2025-08-24 13:52:33 UTC by donux-nl ♦10 |
| 167818778 (Comments: 3) | PainWithChocolate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich würde auch bei der Querung der Königsallee keine bauliche Trennung sehen und halte daher 2 separate ways für unnötig und inkonsistent zum Rest der Stadt. commented 2025-08-24 13:50:12 UTC by Backpfeifenolga ♦8 |
| 170910998 (Comments: 1) | Pierrot3544 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour sur https://dondesang.efs.sante.fr/bretagne/maison-du-don-de-lorient-keryado, la Maison du don s'appelle Maison du don. Lorient ou Lorient Keryado, c'est juste la localisation, qui ne fait pas partie du nom (éventuellement... commented 2025-08-24 13:43:31 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 170924294 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 453) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse=grass commented 2025-08-24 13:42:24 UTC by olo81 ♦685 |
| 170101171 (Comments: 9) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 453) | A co ma przekop w ziemi do private? commented 2025-08-24 13:28:13 UTC by olo81 ♦685 |
| 170924255 (Comments: 1) | Duiven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De parkeerplaats staat al op de kaart als vlak. Ik haal je toevoeging weer weg. Een laadmogelijkheid zou... commented 2025-08-24 13:25:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169275320 (Comments: 6) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 453) | Drugiej nie znajduje. A dwie w jednej gminie to chyba niemożliwe. Daj linka do drugiej jeśli istnieje. https://pzgik.geoportal.gov.pl/prng/Miejscowosc/PL.PZGiK.204.PRNG.00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000082945-63789 commented 2025-08-24 13:21:27 UTC by olo81 ♦685 |
 | 170049923 (Comments: 1) | iSumeri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello iSumeri, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Iraq. I see you added some new highways as "highway=tertiary". Examples of highways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420387715 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way... commented 2025-08-24 13:12:04 UTC by little_maper ♦88 |
| 170922228 (Comments: 1) | Fabianbuecheler (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hallo Fabian, Kannst du mir bitte erklären, woher du deine Information für deine Änderung hast? Warst du vor Ort und hast im Chor mitgesungen? Bist du vorbei gelaufen und hast ein Schild gesehen? Oder das In... commented 2025-08-24 13:08:36 UTC by Metzor ♦380 |
 | 170899514 (Comments: 2) | Nyukusai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо TrickyFoxy, буду знать. commented 2025-08-24 13:06:45 UTC by Nyukusai ♦1 |
| 156924355 (Comments: 7) | Dillen GJ (Discussed changesets: 60) | Puik werk omdat je lokatie bepaling acurater is als van Geldmaat zelf ! (uitgaande van mijn eyes on ground waarneming te Bazaar Beverwijk) commented 2025-08-24 12:59:01 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦38 |
| 164951740 (Comments: 3) | GurVJ (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, effectivement c'est GeorgeKaplan qui a passé la route en highway=living_street. Il s'agit des zones 20 : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_de_rencontre?uselang=fr. Il y a des panneaux d'entrée (et de sorti... commented 2025-08-24 12:54:20 UTC by trial ♦897 |
 | 170891373 (Comments: 2) | nestorlora (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Daniel, Muchas gracias por el comentario y la información. No me había dado cuenta del detalle de los números 1 y 2 de la plaza. El callejero de Málaga no considera la zona verde al sur del vial como parte d... commented 2025-08-24 12:53:55 UTC by nestorlora ♦1 |
| 158457348 (Comments: 1) | Dom61 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ciao Dom61, posso sapere perché hai aggiunto su questo edificio layer=1? Visto, che hai scritto "errata corrige",non riesco capire. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145875957 commented 2025-08-24 12:51:32 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦300 |
| 170892899 (Comments: 3) | kintetsu (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hallo kintetsu, danke für deine Rückmeldung. Da ich noch einige weitere Änderungen für diskussionswürdig halte, habe ich mal eine Thread im Forum erstellt: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/useredits-mit-aus-meiner-sic... commented 2025-08-24 12:44:12 UTC by lollybyte ♦7 |
| 169632694 (Comments: 6) | Fabianbuecheler (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hallo Metzor, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht! Ich habe gerade eben den Namen von dieser Kirche verbessert, wo man bei den Ändeungssatz 170922228 zu sehen ist. Falls das doch falsch ist, den ich habe es durch J... commented 2025-08-24 12:43:56 UTC by Fabianbuecheler ♦47 |
| 170920261 (Comments: 2) | Jurrt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't use aerial imagery to reshape buildings. They are not perpendicular taken. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-08-24 12:39:23 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170873013 (Comments: 5) | BartekChom (Discussed changesets: 29) | Dziękuję, zobaczymy, jak wyjdzie w praktyce. commented 2025-08-24 12:39:07 UTC by BartekChom ♦33 |
| 170873292 (Comments: 1) | Cihad GÜNDOĞDU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Geleneksel isim yerine ulusal isim etiketi ile "Mezere" ismini eklemişsiniz. Bölgesel kullanılan bir isimse lütfen reg_name ile etiketleme yapınız. Daha fazla bilgi için: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:n... commented 2025-08-24 12:27:31 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170889045 (Comments: 2) | kintetsu (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hallo lollybyte, es ist durchaus nicht unüblich, landwirtschaftliche Flächen über Feldwege zusammenzuziehen. Gegenfrage: Gibt es im konkreten Fall einen Grund, wieso dies nicht getan werden sollte? commented 2025-08-24 12:20:30 UTC by kintetsu ♦30 |
| 170880851 (Comments: 1) | Cattor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't abbreaviate roads. Thanks. commented 2025-08-24 12:19:05 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170889845 (Comments: 2) | kintetsu (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hallo lollybyte, ich kann leider im Moment nicht mehr nachvollziehen, um welche Änderung es sich genau handelt. Im Prinzip sind die Grenzen zwischen Baumreihe und Wald oftmals fließend. Ich mache aus breiteren Baumreihen eher einen Wald ,... commented 2025-08-24 12:14:18 UTC by kintetsu ♦30 |
 | 170739192 (Comments: 1) | Yadusable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! All other train protection system has the prefix railway (for example railway:etcs, see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Arailway%3Aetcs) commented 2025-08-24 12:09:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170865712 (Comments: 3) | CSchwappi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich wollte gerade schreiben, name is name only, da habe ich gesehen, dass du mit v4 name entfernt hast ;-) Also ist alles so weit gut, nur schreibe bitte die Straße mit 'ß', ansosnen kommt wieder Mecker von irgendjemand.<... commented 2025-08-24 11:58:47 UTC by berndw ♦604 |
| 170621400 (Comments: 1) | s3p-scale-4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ref : s3p-scale-4@s3pweb.com ???? commented 2025-08-24 11:57:23 UTC by aytfadc ♦18 |
| 170919032 (Comments: 1) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 453) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2284170097 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-08-24 11:30:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170900933 (Comments: 1) | Tbydsucqııyu Ctdeq The Second (Discussed changesets: 2) | locality, quarter ve suburb etiketlerine sahip olan elementler resmi kaynaklarda gözükmemekte. Bunların doğru olduğuna emin misiniz? commented 2025-08-24 11:25:34 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170904846 (Comments: 1) | andrewpmk (Discussed changesets: 79) | This update removed names on sidewalks. I will put them back. commented 2025-08-24 11:18:59 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦382 |
| 170907204 (Comments: 1) | lleung (Discussed changesets: 5) | This access road to the cemetry is accessible to cars. I will revert. Thanks for your comprehension. commented 2025-08-24 11:16:42 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦382 |
| 170917583 (Comments: 1) | BlauweFietsKetting (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag BFK, Wegen die op privegrond liggen mogen gewoon op de kaart blijven. Wel met de juiste accesstags. Ze kunnen van belang zijn voor bv hulpdiensten. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170917583 MVG eggie commented 2025-08-24 11:14:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170916879 (Comments: 1) | ozls (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for spotting a missing convenience shop. Please do not edit building structures for edits like this. A simple floating node inside the building is the recommended way to tag shops. We fixed your... commented 2025-08-24 11:10:13 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,527 |
| 170819312 (Comments: 4) | DHCat14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo DHCat14, mir wäre es auch recht, wenn die Renderer der Karte einen Minikreisverkehr so darstellen würde, wie wir ihn gerne hätten und die Navis das entsprechend auswerten würden. Wir mappen aber nicht nur für den Ren... commented 2025-08-24 11:06:57 UTC by ghostrider44 ♦65 |
| 170914681 (Comments: 3) | rampenbestrijding (Discussed changesets: 5) | Het water op water heb ik weer verwijderd (foutmelding) en de tag voor jachthaven weer teruggezet. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-24 11:06:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170916685 (Comments: 1) | MeltingFires (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please decrease your edit area. Don't use name= to describe an object. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-08-24 11:00:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170916679 (Comments: 1) | MeltingFires (Discussed changesets: 3) | Daf MeldtingFires.. Zou je svp je gebied van je edits kunnen beperken tot bv een straat. Je veranderd wel heel veel mapwerk van andere mappers. bv eroway\taerodrome ? name=Windsock Wat bedoel je daar mee? Is dat de naam van het obj... commented 2025-08-24 10:59:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170917608 (Comments: 1) | Maruh24 (Discussed changesets: 3) | For English speakers, please use translate platform/web/app... for understanding the explanation, because of the script limitation on the explain part. commented 2025-08-24 10:57:14 UTC by Maruh24 ♦3 |
| 170916639 (Comments: 1) | MeltingFires (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-24 10:55:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169664142 (Comments: 1) | Amras05 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You deleted the names of buildings here> However, previous mapper mapped clusters of buildings. Buildings need to be mapped individually. I invalidate this task. commented 2025-08-24 10:51:22 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 133394898 (Comments: 1) | overflorian (Discussed changesets: 68) | Bonjour, Es-tu sûr que le tag ''railway=tram'' est approprié avec "landuse=railway" ? commented 2025-08-24 10:41:57 UTC by AurélienQ ♦131 |
| 170842685 (Comments: 1) | Mj007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-08-24 10:35:02 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170853529 (Comments: 1) | Maja337P (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-08-24 10:25:31 UTC by bartgron ♦217 |
| 170377434 (Comments: 3) | kapazao_import (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hola, no entiendo lo que comentas. Simplemente se corrigieron elementos que empezaban por CAP y falló un filtro con las clínicas. Si estas no estaban correctamente como CAP no es problema de mi edición, sino de quien pusiera d... commented 2025-08-24 10:21:45 UTC by kapazao ♦918 |
| 170914262 (Comments: 1) | rampenbestrijding (Discussed changesets: 5) | Je plakt hier water op water.. Dat geeft een foutmelding. Is het een leisure=marina. Dat is een transparant over water. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-24 10:21:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 166185447 (Comments: 1) | Skycaptnkragg (Discussed changesets: 1) | I, buy_osmand hereby affirms the great value of the ground_survey `check_dates` by good mapper, Skycaptnkragg. Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized. I, buy_osmand, Living man of the is... commented 2025-08-24 10:20:49 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 169958161 (Comments: 2) | moritz1522 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dazu gibt es kein ersichtliches Schild aber die Schranke versperrt im geschlossenen Zustand den kompletten Weg, so dass ein durchkommen nur noch durch „durchklettern“ bzw. „drüberklettern“ möglich wäre, damit w&... commented 2025-08-24 10:17:48 UTC by moritz1522 ♦1 |
| 167411232 (Comments: 7) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks! commented 2025-08-24 09:58:36 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170914543 (Comments: 1) | Infamiis (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-24 09:50:45 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170914355 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 73) | Sadly, there was nothing I could do to control the bounding box in JOSM, since ferry routes have to be a single way regardless of how long it is. commented 2025-08-24 09:41:18 UTC by ika-chan! ♦267 |
| 170899809 (Comments: 2) | ukinimod (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dziękuję za powiadomienie, zmieniłem na addr:place. Pozdrawiam! commented 2025-08-24 09:14:48 UTC by ukinimod ♦2 |
| 170761579 (Comments: 2) | CarlosGeldo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola Jordi, gracias por la observación. Ahora están los nombres coloquiales en la etiqueta loc_name. Un saludo! commented 2025-08-24 09:11:25 UTC by CarlosGeldo ♦2 |
| 170867340 (Comments: 1) | raffons (Discussed changesets: 7) | Attenzione! Anche iD devi averti segnalato che stavi interrompendo una relazione escursionistica!! Ho ripristinato la connessione che hai rotto. Ti informo che la relazione è un percorso escursionistico a catasto nazionale. Ti ... commented 2025-08-24 09:09:41 UTC by Jrachi ♦776 |
| 170887947 (Comments: 1) | Leon Godau (Discussed changesets: 3) | Percorso Kneipp commented 2025-08-24 09:04:36 UTC by Geremia666 ♦1 |
| 170897887 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. As far I can see, you adjusted (squared?) and mapped buildings. Since the Imagery is very clear, you can see both the roof and the walls of buildings. In those cases, similar as highrise buildings, ... commented 2025-08-24 09:02:52 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170574733 (Comments: 3) | CJY (Discussed changesets: 2) | Whilst applying the correction I found that pasting the prow_ref tag to the revised sections of the path was applied incorrectly by JOSM. Should be OK now. commented 2025-08-24 09:00:41 UTC by CJY ♦2 |
| 170887959 (Comments: 1) | Leon Godau (Discussed changesets: 3) | EN Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, a... commented 2025-08-24 08:59:33 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦122 |
| 170888847 (Comments: 2) | Befajomo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Prima, bedankt commented 2025-08-24 08:52:24 UTC by Befajomo ♦2 |
| 170911965 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949689017 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-08-24 08:40:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
 | 164928991 (Comments: 5) | Evgeniya_rocketdata (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi everyone, Evgeniya_rocketdata can you also check following 1) phone numbers. For example here phone is not correct: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12399606374 2) Operator is not correct https://www.openstree... commented 2025-08-24 08:28:24 UTC by Smajser ♦6 |
| 170911033 (Comments: 1) | comfyquiettree (Discussed changesets: 17) | The source tag under this changeset should be survey commented 2025-08-24 08:27:26 UTC by comfyquiettree ♦31 |
| 170911326 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 9) | Whoops, that's not quite what I wanted the reverter to do. I'll do the rest manually. commented 2025-08-24 08:24:41 UTC by pwbriggs ♦57 |
| 57890584 (Comments: 2) | FRichard44 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bonjour, C'est quelque chose que j'avais du récupérer via un signalement Osmose. Soit la valeur dans la donnée source était erronée, soit j'ai mal positionné entre un isolant et un pyl&oc... commented 2025-08-24 08:24:29 UTC by FRichard44 ♦17 |
| 170907053 (Comments: 1) | Ole (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo Ole, bitte setze kein foot=yes and highway=footway. highway=footway impliziert bereits, dass es sich um einen ausgewiesenen Fußweg handelt und foot=designated ist daher inbegriffen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29375282... commented 2025-08-24 08:16:59 UTC by limes11 ♦913 |
 | 170576682 (Comments: 1) | zhilayaghoubi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19471557. What is the mean of the tags type=تعویض_روغنی تعمیرگار=تعویض روغنی ? Please notice we use britisch English for keys and stand... commented 2025-08-24 08:13:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170901323 (Comments: 4) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 8) | 👍 Oke duidelijker kan niet commented 2025-08-24 08:13:23 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170806665 (Comments: 1) | Mackomick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contributions. Isn't this building a house, though? I know the other buildings surrounding are mostly just tagged as generic "buildings," but that's only because nobody's checked what kind of building they are ... commented 2025-08-24 08:09:21 UTC by pwbriggs ♦57 |
| 63219361 (Comments: 1) | Adrien G (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, La caméra ci-dessous est-elle vraiment à 220 m de hauteur ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5956429409/history Peut-être que l'attribut height était sensé se trouver sur le n&oel... commented 2025-08-24 08:08:43 UTC by fgouget ♦119 |
| 170889891 (Comments: 5) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Przyjrzę się. Czasem takie dachy są oznaczane jako osobny building=roof, co też jest jakimś wyjściem. commented 2025-08-24 08:07:16 UTC by Rogoyski ♦225 |
| 73547767 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 153) | Bonjour, Je doute que l'antenne relais ci-dessous fasse 248 m de haut. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6727109310/history Au vu des photos de terrain elle semble plutôt faire dans les 24 m mais dans ce cas il serait... commented 2025-08-24 08:00:22 UTC by fgouget ♦119 |
| 143412825 (Comments: 2) | GirafonFr (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, En effet, elle fait 0,5 mètre. commented 2025-08-24 07:58:55 UTC by GirafonFr ♦4 |
 | 170863106 (Comments: 1) | Constable7065 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not delete existing roads, even if it is access=private commented 2025-08-24 07:53:07 UTC by vasony ♦514 |
| 170744952 (Comments: 2) | Felix borges (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey @Felix borges! The building you edited looks like an apartment building to me. Can you confirm that you chose the correct building (and whether the business fills the entire building or is just located within it)? Thanks! commented 2025-08-24 07:50:43 UTC by pwbriggs ♦57 |
| 170777528 (Comments: 3) | D_rikito (Discussed changesets: 1) | There are actually several tags for this situation: starting with a natural source (natural = spring) to buildings for protecting springs (man_made = spring_box) [list is not exhaustive]. I would probably consider the protection of the spring to be t... commented 2025-08-24 07:49:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
 | 170880903 (Comments: 2) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 58) | I guessed you have your practice in mapping these stops. Maybe to document it in the BG wiki? commented 2025-08-24 07:35:26 UTC by rhhs ♦136 |
| 170686180 (Comments: 2) | Fatimah Abanur (Discussed changesets: 3) | This looks like a private driveway. Not sure if it connects through to the alleyway though. County iMap also does not display it. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2025-08-24 07:26:27 UTC by pwbriggs ♦57 |
| 170685881 (Comments: 2) | Fatimah Abanur (Discussed changesets: 3) | This moved a stop sign (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6611132085) out of position. Fixed! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170909401 commented 2025-08-24 07:21:55 UTC by pwbriggs ♦57 |
| 170885747 (Comments: 1) | icluf (Discussed changesets: 8) | merci pour la modif, ça correspond mieux au terrain. commented 2025-08-24 07:15:50 UTC by Laurent Granjon ♦1 |
| 170557975 (Comments: 1) | Dren ar Frankig (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/385278593. What is the mean of the tag Landerval = Hentig Landerval? commented 2025-08-24 07:11:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170685411 (Comments: 2) | Fatimah Abanur (Discussed changesets: 3) | @Glassman Looks like the church was recently marked as demolished[https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228764315/history/6] and in a construction site[https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422502654]. Also the moving company seems to have a lot of i... commented 2025-08-24 07:10:53 UTC by pwbriggs ♦57 |
| 170706104 (Comments: 2) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 133) | Jepp, das hat da nichts zu suchen. Habe es gelöscht. Danke für die Info. commented 2025-08-24 07:08:11 UTC by surveyor54 ♦653 |
 | 170907190 (Comments: 1) | Mindaugas Nižauskas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Laba diena. Sveikinu prisijungus. Nepanašu, kad čia „turgelis“? Kas čia yra? Maitinimo vieta? Man nežinant labiau panašu į restaurant/fast_food ar pan. Būtų gerai ir darbo laikas, kada žmonės gali atvažiuoti, nes na... commented 2025-08-24 07:03:34 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,970 |
| 150486436 (Comments: 2) | Konradowy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wygląda jak godziny otwarcia z tego kościoła https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375634426 ale z kąt się tu wzięły to nie wiem commented 2025-08-24 07:01:02 UTC by Konradowy ♦2 |
| 170901707 (Comments: 2) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ik zie ook geen duidelijk pad... Wanneer er veel gewandeld wordt dan ontstaan soms vanzelf paden. Een grijs gebied. Soms lopen ergens wandelrouterelaties en dan is het wel zaak om die looproute als highway=path met informal=yes te late... commented 2025-08-24 07:01:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169117780 (Comments: 5) | Mammi71 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Ref ist jetzt eingetragen. Die anderen Hinweise habe ich mir angeschaut, aber sind noch offen. commented 2025-08-24 06:45:26 UTC by martried ♦9 |
 | 170546651 (Comments: 2) | breno-au (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, thanks for the conditional tag fix :) My update and opening hours was based on my site survey on 2025-08-14, with photo available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lake_Mountain_resort_entry_gate_with_opening_hours_information.jpg... commented 2025-08-24 06:41:55 UTC by breno-au ♦20 |
| 170862532 (Comments: 1) | venelin98 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is there nothing left of the pharmacy? If it is now a vacant shop, it's better to choose "Празно е" (which adds disused: to the shop tag). If later a new shop moved in, it's easier to add it and the history of the node is p... commented 2025-08-24 06:31:09 UTC by rhhs ♦136 |
| 170613574 (Comments: 1) | BuschGH (Discussed changesets: 4) | Moin! Was ist der Sinn dahinter, Stellplätze, die scheinbar zu Gartenheim eG gehören (was übrigens nicht operator:type=private, sondern operator:type=cooperative ist), alle separat einzuzeichnen, obwohl die Stellplätze als solc... commented 2025-08-24 06:26:00 UTC by Nadjita ♦68 |
| 163686259 (Comments: 1) | DaveC46 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Pourquoi l'arbre ci-dessous a-t-il deux diamètres et deux hauteurs ? Sur les photos de terrain il ne semble y avoir qu'un tronc. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9052848873/history Cordialement, commented 2025-08-24 06:24:39 UTC by fgouget ♦119 |
| 170882264 (Comments: 1) | Danysan95 (Discussed changesets: 13) | please consider my remarks in note 4924888 commented 2025-08-24 06:21:55 UTC by Una tantum ♦8 |
 | 169542645 (Comments: 2) | Sparkis1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have fixed this by removing the name and changing it to access=employees. commented 2025-08-24 06:18:44 UTC by jesselawtonnz ♦4 |
| 170879074 (Comments: 2) | Xyberion (Discussed changesets: 44) | Ja, ik heb het aangepast. commented 2025-08-24 05:59:38 UTC by Xyberion ♦19 |
| 167515605 (Comments: 3) | HamiDesert (Discussed changesets: 7) | I've removed the name. commented 2025-08-24 05:17:33 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦684 |
| 131071966 (Comments: 2) | Stephan van Helden (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, danke für den Hinweis, schaue ich mir in den nächsten Tagen an. commented 2025-08-24 05:02:54 UTC by Stephan van Helden ♦14 |
| 170895678 (Comments: 1) | Begavil84 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Here you've deleted some retaining walls (why?) and moved some buildings imported from the regional technical map, which are correctly positioned (but out of alignment on some orthophotos like Bing). Those buildings shouldn't be moved. commented 2025-08-24 05:02:12 UTC by corfede ♦303 |
| 170898205 (Comments: 1) | Begavil84 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Good morning, I'd like to point out that I think it's a mistake to remove the detailed residential polygons and replace them with a huge residential polygon covering schools and everything else. You've also removed benches that I know ... commented 2025-08-24 04:54:14 UTC by corfede ♦303 |
| 170903461 (Comments: 1) | B972025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I, buy_osmand, Living man of the island known in the Book of Nations as, the Republik of Singapura, do hereby reaffirm his intentions written at a date timestamped prior as quoted verbatim, " 👀 This changeset is being watched by the #Living. ... commented 2025-08-24 04:36:58 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170806772 (Comments: 1) | Nicolasito García (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170906245 commented 2025-08-24 04:25:55 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,088 |
| 170799899 (Comments: 1) | flug32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey flug32, I find it highly doubtful that the new residential street lets the creek run across it. Using your Mapillary traces, I went and moved the creek so that it isn't glued to the new roads. In your images, it looked like it went under a t... commented 2025-08-24 04:19:32 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦45 |
| 170702320 (Comments: 1) | nopeinomicon (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't know if you missed this, but the bus number is already present and belongs only in the ref=* tag, not the name=* tag. Is there an app or website you're using that wasn't already prominently showing the ref=* value? While... commented 2025-08-24 04:02:27 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦45 |
| 169793973 (Comments: 1) | @philt3r (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've just uploaded some edits from my recent Broken Hill trip, and noticed a couple of edits here that looked odd. I'm not familiar with the Rapid editor, but I'm assuming the AI part of the editor is giving wrong information. https... commented 2025-08-24 03:31:25 UTC by mrpulley ♦204 |
| 169588796 (Comments: 1) | @philt3r (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've just uploaded some edits from my recent Broken Hill trip, and noticed a couple of edits here that looked odd. I'm not familiar with the Rapid editor, but I'm assuming the AI part of the editor is giving wrong information. https... commented 2025-08-24 03:31:19 UTC by mrpulley ♦204 |
| 168377595 (Comments: 5) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | I second that, please keep the history rather than recreating ways in the same location. I'd suggest checking here for why this is considered good practice https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history Also I'd advise r... commented 2025-08-24 02:51:04 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦41 |
| 170898572 (Comments: 1) | Annabel Elizabeth (Discussed changesets: 13) | Somewhat of a mixed bag here. Overall the sizes of buildings are accurate and off-nadir is being accounted for, but there's definitely some room for improvement. For example a few footprints should be more complex than rectangles and the SE foot... commented 2025-08-24 02:43:43 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170862370 (Comments: 1) | sahilverma (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted your changeset because it appears to be vandalism. Please do not engage in such actions. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170905018 commented 2025-08-24 02:24:42 UTC by KhubsuratInsaan ♦22 |
| 168274845 (Comments: 1) | Kamil Adam (Discussed changesets: 56) | Zdublowana nazwa, do poprawy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219280906 commented 2025-08-24 01:38:20 UTC by olo81 ♦685 |
| 170898450 (Comments: 1) | Annabel Elizabeth (Discussed changesets: 13) | You made good use of a secondary imagery source. Just remember to align to the primary source, GPS traces, or existing data depending on the context. The footprint here looks accurate. It could be slightly wider but that's a minor point. It also... commented 2025-08-24 01:33:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170861891 (Comments: 1) | Dalmanz22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. There were a numbe... commented 2025-08-24 00:26:39 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170903627 (Comments: 1) | neondev1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Not sure if the bus on-ramp should be tagged as highway=service or highway=motorway_link; I tagged it as service for now since there's a bus bay in the ramp. If someone could review that that would be great. commented 2025-08-24 00:12:20 UTC by neondev1 ♦2 |
| 170860613 (Comments: 2) | maikhanht (Discussed changesets: 2) | The school was already tagged, but your node was better placed so I merged the two. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170860613 commented 2025-08-24 00:07:42 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170860440 (Comments: 1) | jaymeister (Discussed changesets: 2) | It looks like you added duplicate ways in two fo the building you modified. I removed the duplicate ways. Let me know if you have any questions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2025-08-24 00:03:00 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170898300 (Comments: 1) | Annabel Elizabeth (Discussed changesets: 13) | You mapped a valid footprint, with an accurate shape, that has been appropriately squared and moved in the direction of its base to account for off-nadir imagery. A clear improvement. Thank you very much for taking my feedback onboard. A coupl... commented 2025-08-24 00:01:02 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170860145 (Comments: 1) | jaymeister (Discussed changesets: 2) | The original house looked better. I think the only problem is the imagery offset needed adjusting. You can do that in the editor by clicking on the background icon. Imagery offset is located towards the bottom of the list. --- ... commented 2025-08-23 23:56:41 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170860423 (Comments: 1) | ddo2002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The correct tag is building=*. I went ahead and added it back. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170860423 commented 2025-08-23 23:54:15 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170882024 (Comments: 2) | dasrecht (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, danke für die Hinweise. Habe ich so angepasst. commented 2025-08-23 23:54:04 UTC by dasrecht ♦3 |
| 170861085 (Comments: 2) | Traanh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looking at the county reconds, my guess is these are just service roads. Can you review and remove the parking aisle tag as needed? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170861085 ... commented 2025-08-23 23:51:35 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170765934 (Comments: 1) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 44) | La pista ciclabile che hai tracciato lungo Via Papiria non esiste. C'è una corsia ciclabile ed era già mappata. commented 2025-08-23 23:50:15 UTC by sorcrosc ♦416 |
| 170860694 (Comments: 1) | Traanh (Discussed changesets: 2) | The buildings still need the building= tag. I went ahead and added them back. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170860694 commented 2025-08-23 23:41:30 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170857913 (Comments: 1) | voidy1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: If the features don't align with the imagery, just adjust the imagery offset using the Background settings icon on the right side of the editor. the offset adjustment is located towards the bottom of the list. --- ... commented 2025-08-23 23:37:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170771181 (Comments: 1) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 44) | Qui ci sono cancellazioni sbagliate dei percorsi pedonali attorno alla rotatoria, che esistono. Li ho ripristinati. Inoltre l'eliminazione di crossing=zebra, sostituito da un generico crossing:markings=yes lo considero un peggioramento... commented 2025-08-23 23:33:52 UTC by sorcrosc ♦416 |
| 170888609 (Comments: 1) | Eymeinnysf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18655 commented 2025-08-23 23:30:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170819182 (Comments: 1) | wacseattle (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm curious, why did you remove the wikidata and wikipedia tags? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170819182 commented 2025-08-23 23:29:56 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170881601 (Comments: 1) | tobiasff3200 (Discussed changesets: 4) | natural=grassland beschreibt natürliche Graslandschaften, z.B. in der Savanne. commented 2025-08-23 23:27:30 UTC by Bienson ♦310 |
| 170771301 (Comments: 1) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 44) | Il tratto di strada al centro delle rotatoria è usato quando ci sono trasporti eccezionali, di solito barche. Ho ripristinato la mappatura precedente. commented 2025-08-23 23:21:44 UTC by sorcrosc ♦416 |
| 170715281 (Comments: 2) | waf_jeremymead (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for fixing it! (Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170782235, for anyone reading this in future) commented 2025-08-23 23:17:29 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 165471939 (Comments: 2) | C-sinensis (Discussed changesets: 1) | You also tagged some path with "fixme = to resurvey". Can you tell me more about what you expect ? Best regards, Djam. commented 2025-08-23 22:46:02 UTC by Djam ♦5 |
| 170862648 (Comments: 1) | JoeG (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, there appears to be a section here that has been broken. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.06782&lat=-35.26725&zoom=14 commented 2025-08-23 22:14:23 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
 | 162685386 (Comments: 2) | rahal2022 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://x.com/SaraAlmalki2014?s=09 https://www.instagram.com/qani.ffarm?igsh=MXJsNXIyNnk5b3FzZA== commented 2025-08-23 22:02:15 UTC by rahal2022 ♦3 |
| 162685029 (Comments: 2) | rahal2022 (Discussed changesets: 6) | ملعب الموطف ـAl-Mutaf Stadium commented 2025-08-23 21:59:01 UTC by rahal2022 ♦3 |
| 170900789 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13093153799 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-08-23 21:40:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170892740 (Comments: 3) | Loed Rongen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Losse eindje weer verbonden. Dassenburcht is geen geografische naam en kan denk ik ook beter niet op de kaart. Dat triggert wellicht ongewenste activiteiten. Vlak bos laten aansluiten. commented 2025-08-23 21:32:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170889920 (Comments: 2) | Loed Rongen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Alle losliggende eindjes aan elkaar geknoopt zodat het weer routeert. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170889920 Je fouten: warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway \t3 warnings:close_nodes:vertices \t1 warnings:... commented 2025-08-23 21:27:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170878942 (Comments: 4) | NieWnen-reverter (Discussed changesets: 3) | @theDM Nie stanowię głosu wszystkich, więc nie wiem, czy jest to wskazane, żebym podawał tutaj konkretną wartość. Możesz to na forum w tej dyskusji wrzucić, to mogę tam od razu tam podrzucić Overpassa, który mi się do te... commented 2025-08-23 21:25:34 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,109 |
| 169220117 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thank you for advising me with this. I do appreciate it. commented 2025-08-23 21:21:20 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦22 |
| 168035189 (Comments: 6) | knoefix (Discussed changesets: 8) | Vermurlich war version 5 von dir und ich hab etwas "nachgebessert". Falls ich es verschlimmbessert habe dann bitte melden oder direkt korrigieren. Grüße commented 2025-08-23 20:47:07 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,341 |
| 170893069 (Comments: 1) | MrAidenCraftFW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, auch hier: keine Anmerkungen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-23 20:40:10 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170889702 (Comments: 1) | MrAidenCraftFW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Keine Anmerkungen – das sieht gut aus. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen. Viele ... commented 2025-08-23 20:38:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170686388 (Comments: 9) | delineatorix (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hallo, danke dir für die Rückmeldung. Deine Anpassung war inhaltlich zumindest nachvollziehbar. Zum Vergleich: gerade habe ich eine Änderung zu "Rheinaue Lausward" zurückgedreht. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-23 20:34:31 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170851165 (Comments: 2) | amiga2000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, dein Kommentar hat auffällige Parallelen zu einem Kommentar vom 19. August 2025, 13:17 Uhr zu https://rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/duesseldorf/duesseldorf-stadt-will-den-namen-paradiesstrand-loeschen_aid-133170633 Daraus ergibt sich... commented 2025-08-23 20:32:03 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
 | 170243526 (Comments: 3) | aleph_null (Discussed changesets: 8) | good points, I guess the additional tags won't hurt since the area:highway key isn't yet widespread 👍️ commented 2025-08-23 20:21:01 UTC by stellarrrr ♦2 |
| 149088564 (Comments: 2) | nick26841 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Victor, I hope you are well. I was always curious about this. Having "All" set to "yes" and then having a "no" in one option, like foot access, seems confusing because "All" is not logically t... commented 2025-08-23 20:18:23 UTC by nick26841 ♦5 |
 | 170894408 (Comments: 1) | I Am Smiling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-23 20:15:09 UTC by Comino ♦120 |
| 169774613 (Comments: 1) | Rocca Gaspare (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Gaspare, ti scrivo per farti presente che la maggior parte dei percorsi qui, modificati da te, vengono visti da Osmose come percorsi con due nomi inseriti (The name tag contains two names), e così sembrerebbe infatti, per convenzione i pe... commented 2025-08-23 20:12:12 UTC by DomeF ♦5 |
| 170895270 (Comments: 1) | Maruh24 (Discussed changesets: 3) | some data of bus stops name of this 2 routes (intercity) in the old "Tay Ninh city" area you guys can also search them in smart Tay Ninh web https://smart.tayninh.gov.vn/tuyenxebus/bando commented 2025-08-23 20:08:43 UTC by Maruh24 ♦3 |
| 170747054 (Comments: 1) | Mau_Ns (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! You spotted buildings in the imagery but some of the footprints you mapped are inaccurate. Every footprint should represent only one building. Please complete the ID editor tutorial if you h... commented 2025-08-23 19:48:38 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170896778 (Comments: 1) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 148) | Before: https://viewer.geovisio.fr/viewer.html?focus=pic&pic=decd2fd7-a6e6-4710-9fb0-2eb58a0b79c4&xyz=185.73/0.02/80 Now: https://viewer.geovisio.fr/viewer.html?focus=pic&pic=dccaae07-69da-420a-962c-55f390810353&xyz=330.91/-8.7... commented 2025-08-23 19:36:48 UTC by M!dgard ♦795 |
| 170891230 (Comments: 1) | Trevor_1 (Discussed changesets: 184) | Hi, this changesets have several errors end needed to be reverted, if you have any doubts, please send a message or continue the discussion here or in any of the changesets involved. Please consult https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red... commented 2025-08-23 19:31:43 UTC by ferog_v ♦24 |
 | 170896445 (Comments: 1) | Tesupersnake (Discussed changesets: 1) | Дорога только либо для жестких внедорожников, либо для велосипедов горных. Когда я ехал, там было много луж и немало упавших деревьев commented 2025-08-23 19:28:19 UTC by Tesupersnake ♦1 |
| 136451440 (Comments: 1) | 2016_AM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo 2016_AM, dieser Änderungssatz enthält leider keinen Kommentar und der erfasste Knoten ist entweder unvollständig oder fehlerhaft. Bitte immer aussagefähige Kommentare angeben. Daher habe ich diesen Knoten ... commented 2025-08-23 19:24:15 UTC by redd ♦415 |
| 168005981 (Comments: 8) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | To chyba nie miejsce na porady prawne? Zakaz parkowania oznacza, że nie możesz tam wjechać i zaparkować. Jednak wjechać możesz, Parkowanie to zatrzymanie pojazdu na czas ponad 1 minutę, o ile nie wynika to z warunków ruchu drogowego. M... commented 2025-08-23 19:20:11 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,289 |
| 170839508 (Comments: 1) | danyvs0801 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! The footprints you mapped here represent buildings and have been appropriately squared, however they are generally slightly oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accuratel... commented 2025-08-23 19:06:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170705205 (Comments: 1) | kiwichickenmusician (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/7750343254. What is the mean of the tag ref:Ičo = 43404324? commented 2025-08-23 19:02:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 149951199 (Comments: 1) | BG_Architect (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great work! Thanks for mapping the bench. I was also thought about doing it a few years ago but never found the time commented 2025-08-23 18:44:39 UTC by MappingNomad ♦1 |
 | 170888492 (Comments: 1) | abdoox003 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, bienvenue sur OSM. Vous avez enlevé le nom de ce segment de la Rue 94, qui avait pourtant été vérifé sur place, comment expliquez-vous cette suppression? De plus, merci de rajouter des points ... commented 2025-08-23 18:38:36 UTC by ilias_ ♦229 |
| 170792120 (Comments: 1) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/13087282398. What is the mean of socket:typef = 2 socket:typef:output = 2 kW (unknown typef)? commented 2025-08-23 18:34:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170886557 (Comments: 2) | dowright27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! And thank you for the tip to include the day; good catch! Yes, the time was for Sunday. commented 2025-08-23 18:33:52 UTC by dowright27 ♦1 |
| 101366846 (Comments: 1) | totera (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ciao, ti scrivo solo perché inserita nel tuo gruppo di modifiche #101366846, sto parlando della chiesa di sant’antonio (Venarotta) , identificata erroneamente come “Edicola Votiva” (in realtà è una piccola chies... commented 2025-08-23 17:47:11 UTC by Maloss34 ♦8 |
 | 170892347 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 205) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4925787 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 19:24\tclosed\tok 4925788 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 19:24\tclosed\tok 4925789 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 19:24\tclosed\tok 4925791 (iD)\tfel... commented 2025-08-23 17:27:40 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170892154 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 205) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4925773 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 19:20\tclosed\tok 4925780 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 19:20\tclosed\tok 4925775 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 19:20\tclosed\tok 4925782 (iD)\tfel... commented 2025-08-23 17:22:19 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170891451 (Comments: 1) | Hanss81 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Op de hekken zou je ook nog access=private kunnen bijtaggen. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-23 17:19:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170891165 (Comments: 1) | Hanss81 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alle begin is moeilijk. Formeel is het niet doordlopend. Dat je er als onbevoegd niet mag komen is wat anders. Het zal niet routeren hier voor onbevoegden. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-23 17:19:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170890845 (Comments: 1) | Hanss81 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Hans Een highway=residential is een straat in een woonwijk. Ik heb er weer een track van gemaakt. De weg staat op access=private. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-23 17:17:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170891301 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 205) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4924312 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 18:59\tclosed\tok.. 4925754 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 18:59\tclosed\tok.. 4925761 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-23 18:59\tclosed\tok.. 4925768 (iD... commented 2025-08-23 17:16:37 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170890659 (Comments: 1) | Hanss81 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De access heb ik aangepast naar private. Het hek heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM... commented 2025-08-23 17:14:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 28350380 (Comments: 2) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 83) | No estoy seguro. En base de mi GPX del viaje, es posible que me gare ahi - por no muy probable. Para mi esta bien si lo borras commented 2025-08-23 17:14:31 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,211 |
| 170890570 (Comments: 1) | wadis srl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Upon adding your own business to the map, you erased an office named "Service du Registre des personnes morales". I tried to look it up and it seems to be still there, in the same building. There mi... commented 2025-08-23 16:52:05 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,527 |
| 170858581 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 61) | 1) While yes, Hindi is native to India, but it's not the sole language. Moreover, it is only the official language of the Central Government, alongside English, and not a constitutionally designated "national" language. The Constitutio... commented 2025-08-23 16:45:28 UTC by NLBRT ♦19 |
| 170320156 (Comments: 1) | Lt Koksu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, Na przyszłość proszę o większą uwagę podczas edycji, ponieważ (jak rozumiem przez przypadek) skasowałeś znacznik highway z dwóch fragmentów ulic Bartąskiej i Wilczyńskiego. Naprawiłem te błędy w tej edycji... commented 2025-08-23 16:41:08 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦721 |
 | 170889736 (Comments: 1) | skamtebord_alex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Replaced it a bit commented 2025-08-23 16:37:25 UTC by skamtebord_alex ♦1 |
| 167810374 (Comments: 1) | MEL_75 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I don't think that's how you mark up lines on the ground. commented 2025-08-23 16:37:25 UTC by heretofore ♦26 |
| 170880252 (Comments: 7) | Befajomo (Discussed changesets: 2) | De trap selecteren met de linkermuisknop.. dan dacht ik rechts klikken en kiezen voor alke tags zichtbaar. Dan kun je aanvullen of regels verwijderen. Ik gebruik een andere editor. Succes.. eggie.. Wanneer het niet lukt kijk ik va... commented 2025-08-23 16:36:37 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 163287226 (Comments: 2) | Carusiocled (Discussed changesets: 1) | Or a farmland boundary - not sure what the intention is here but it doesn't look right ! commented 2025-08-23 16:31:22 UTC by Russ McD ♦224 |
 | 166059944 (Comments: 5) | toponymia (Discussed changesets: 1) | The cases of multiple descriptions you found are mostly the two local (or at least one used close by) languages, plus English as a global alternative. The German translation seems a bit random - why not French or Spanish? Sure, ancient word... commented 2025-08-23 16:30:58 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 170416105 (Comments: 1) | timmito (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi! Ich kenne mich in Bad Soden nicht so aus. Aber nun kommt die Linie 803 (Relation 6485341) nicht mehr an ihrer Haltestelle im Bahnhof vorbei. Soll das so sein? Weiter frohes Mappen! Senihtu commented 2025-08-23 16:28:15 UTC by Senihtu ♦84 |
| 110470927 (Comments: 2) | dddos (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hallo Scout Jens, bitte den Ball flach halten. Da ist und war nix mit Google. Die Stadt Freiburg gibt das bezeichnete Gebäude(!) mit Hausnummer 80 an. Wenn Du weitere Informationen dazu hast: Du bist frei, diese Dinge einzupflegen! dddo... commented 2025-08-23 16:19:41 UTC by dddos ♦18 |
 | 170273239 (Comments: 1) | xuenhua (Discussed changesets: 1) | 日照—凤县公路不就是342国道吗，这能有什么好改的（ commented 2025-08-23 16:02:12 UTC by 残阳逐流 ♦9 |
 | 170835534 (Comments: 1) | Yurii Skvortsov (Discussed changesets: 310) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war commented 2025-08-23 16:00:10 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦300 |
 | 170879601 (Comments: 1) | Rublistoi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, Riblistoi. I've noticed that all of your changesets have the same comment "general tracing", which doesn't help to know what was changed. One of OSM's basic rules is to write good comments so that other mappe... commented 2025-08-23 15:54:04 UTC by AntMadeira ♦245 |
 | 170609428 (Comments: 5) | Flayer (Discussed changesets: 66) | Way better. Well done! commented 2025-08-23 15:51:52 UTC by idan22moral ♦1 |
| 168005780 (Comments: 7) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | Źródłem było: survey + geoportal property boundaries + orto (dla granicy w miejscu parkingu). commented 2025-08-23 15:40:06 UTC by Poprawiłem ♦4 |
| 170886160 (Comments: 2) | kubzon7 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Poprawione commented 2025-08-23 15:35:19 UTC by kubzon7 ♦20 |
| 163169498 (Comments: 1) | BG2ETV (Discussed changesets: 9) | 您好，沈阳站接入了沈大高速线第三线，请抽空更新与此相关的道岔信息，谢谢 commented 2025-08-23 15:22:26 UTC by DDD丶Samuel ♦10 |
| 170837089 (Comments: 2) | Dago2319 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET This edit + your subsequent edit 170868902 adding "crossing=yes" have been reverted. commented 2025-08-23 15:17:19 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,527 |
| 74057401 (Comments: 2) | bigbug21 (Discussed changesets: 109) | Hallo Wieland, danke für die aufmerksame Durchsicht. Tatsächlich scheint "access=no" hier zu weit zu greifen, vielmehr wäre wohl "access=private" angebracht. Viele Grüße Peter commented 2025-08-23 14:59:21 UTC by bigbug21 ♦149 |
| 160743898 (Comments: 1) | hatochan (Discussed changesets: 18) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538624848/history/2 2024年の編集にもかかわらず、情報源が「国土数値情報（公共施設データ）平成19年 国土交通省」なのはおかしいのではと思います。 おそら... commented 2025-08-23 14:51:59 UTC by 大山かなめ ♦58 |
| 170150277 (Comments: 2) | NVBW_Edit_Eifelkobold (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, ja die Schilderkombi Fuß-/Radweg mit Anlieger frei ist im Tagging nicht ganz eindeutig. Die Kombination mit access=conditional wird z.B. auch hier empfohlen: https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE?q=e&signs=DE:240,1020-30 ... commented 2025-08-23 14:46:26 UTC by NVBW_Edit_Eifelkobold ♦3 |
| 170847407 (Comments: 4) | noenoenoe123 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:tourism=viewpoint : tu peux éventuellement ajouter les directions du point de vue. commented 2025-08-23 14:43:43 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 157596290 (Comments: 1) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 49) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49797415/history/21 This street isn't signed as 'Saint.' https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.509729776633&lng=-0.12699710985027&z=17&pKey=1214950026423558&focus=photo&x=0.72... commented 2025-08-23 14:42:48 UTC by DaveF ♦1,573 |
 | 87463867 (Comments: 2) | Daniel de Góes Nepomuceno (Discussed changesets: 34) | Boa tarde Matheus. Está em obras já bem adiantadas, devem sair na próxima atualização das imagens de satélite. Abraço commented 2025-08-23 14:30:41 UTC by Daniel de Góes Nepomuceno ♦29 |
| 160791852 (Comments: 1) | dornweg (Discussed changesets: 14) | B38, Weinheimer Straße Abzweig L3408, z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347309990 Soweit ich die Stelle kenne, ist hier nur eine Fahrbahn mit drei Fahrstreifen ohne bauliche Trennung. Beim Fahren von Norden und beabsichtigtem Link... commented 2025-08-23 14:18:50 UTC by Bernhard W ♦80 |
| 167910298 (Comments: 1) | Gpoilvet (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hoi, de gangbare tagging voor gsm-masten in hoogspanningsmasten is zonder man_made=mast. operator=* is hier misleidend aangezien de mast zelf door Elia onderhouden wordt. Wat je met type=exchance bedoelt, is niet duidelijk: type=* wordt enkel gebruik... commented 2025-08-23 14:13:00 UTC by M!dgard ♦795 |
| 170878759 (Comments: 2) | Bubbleteagod (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted this changeset that added a city building to a ferry route in Brisbane commented 2025-08-23 14:12:24 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170110892 (Comments: 1) | Manuel Riguera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Benvido a OSM e gracias polas túas aportacións. Ten en conta que en casos coma este, no que un comercio pechou, non se debe borrar do mapa. Débese indicar co prefixo "disused:". Por exemplo quedaría:... commented 2025-08-23 14:07:10 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦341 |
| 170875433 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 862) | Don't worry he's making fun of those idiots who constantly whine about changeset sizes commented 2025-08-23 14:01:24 UTC by Sharko_J ♦76 |
| 170216719 (Comments: 1) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 76) | Sveiki, No kāda avota tu šeit iezīmēji takas? Piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421214349 (kas dabā neeksistē ar apgāztiem kokiem) vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421214358 (kas iezīmēta pāri sētai sl... commented 2025-08-23 13:35:33 UTC by HellMap ♦695 |
| 170854839 (Comments: 2) | ref14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | tysm this is my first time on this platform and i can make a few mistakes while using this map commented 2025-08-23 13:34:16 UTC by ref14 ♦1 |
| 170832407 (Comments: 2) | Eymeinnysf (Discussed changesets: 4) | kusura bakmayın lütfen arkadasım istedi ss alıp silecektim fakat unuttum silmeyi tekrardan kusura bakmayın commented 2025-08-23 13:34:05 UTC by f4phantom ♦1 |
| 170672447 (Comments: 2) | Zismac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey EleGlobe, thank you for reaching out! I appreciate you taking the time to inform me on current mapping practices; hence, I have updated the tags on the Takapūwāhia wharenui as per your suggestions. Additionally, I found the wharenui and whareka... commented 2025-08-23 13:29:48 UTC by Zismac ♦7 |
| 170792862 (Comments: 5) | SunnyIsland10 (Discussed changesets: 14) | About sidewalk=separate, it is indeed ambiguous, but I think the right tag to replace it with is sidewalk:right=separate Mitko, I added a pavement/bus platform here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424401897 Can you check my work and finish ... commented 2025-08-23 13:29:09 UTC by rhhs ♦136 |
| 170796622 (Comments: 2) | fmc_5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es gerade korrigiert. commented 2025-08-23 13:26:42 UTC by fmc_5 ♦1 |
| 170851469 (Comments: 16) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 269) | To wtedy powinny być mapowane, a nie ze nadają nazwy sobie na zapas albo robią plany, które potem się zmieniają. Dlatego argument o planach jest słaby. commented 2025-08-23 13:25:57 UTC by theDM ♦119 |
| 169196641 (Comments: 4) | 1-Byte (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for replying. I'm talking about the rather specific details you added to all the stations in this and adjacent changesets. I don' t think you got it all from the press, did you? commented 2025-08-23 13:19:14 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 170782195 (Comments: 2) | corfede (Discussed changesets: 14) | Sorry, that's a mistake. I've fixed it. Thanks for letting me know. commented 2025-08-23 13:10:22 UTC by corfede ♦303 |
| 163585540 (Comments: 2) | opendcc (Discussed changesets: 141) | This is a typo. I corrected it. commented 2025-08-23 13:03:33 UTC by opendcc ♦1,542 |
 | 170877083 (Comments: 1) | Naja Benyinbor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Naja, Welcome to OSM, and thanks for contributing to the map in Ghana. You are making valuable contributions. One thing you should note is that we don't use ALL UPPER CASE values in OSM, but rather Title Case. I reviewed and co... commented 2025-08-23 12:52:35 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦88 |
| 170860005 (Comments: 2) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 115) | Drogi z adresami lub linkami do projektu zostawiałem. Wandalizm to jest dodawanir dróg niezgodnie z definicja proposed, gdzie jest jasno napisane, że powinno być źródło przebiegu, który rzeczywiście ma powstać. Drogi... commented 2025-08-23 12:49:45 UTC by theDM ♦119 |
| 170676710 (Comments: 6) | D_i_m (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for fixing this up commented 2025-08-23 12:47:39 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 154170216 (Comments: 4) | Bixpix (Discussed changesets: 2) | oui c'est bien possible. On peut découper il me semble dans ID en faisant clic droit sur un point puis les ciseaux. N'hésitez pas à continuer à contribuer et à poser des questions si besoin commented 2025-08-23 12:43:12 UTC by Patchanka ♦390 |
| 170878197 (Comments: 1) | Vasiliev Vladyslav (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-08-23 12:30:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170340723 (Comments: 1) | pat-lachute (Discussed changesets: 9) | Please check and fix. JOSM/Validator might be helpful. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-74.20714&lat=45.68955&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%... commented 2025-08-23 12:26:52 UTC by kartler175 ♦563 |
| 168228213 (Comments: 5) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hallo Woodpeck, haben eben schon auf Deine erste Message geantwortet, und weiß nicht, was diese 2. Message soll! commented 2025-08-23 12:18:11 UTC by Pathumthani ♦32 |
| 168702211 (Comments: 7) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hallo Woodpack, da ich Foren ablehne, meine kurze Antwort hier. Die entscheidende Kommunikation fehlt hier. Ich weiß nicht, ob Du es hinnehmen würdest, wenn Deine Ausrufezeichen als "Geschrei" bezeichnet werden. Für mich ... commented 2025-08-23 12:15:07 UTC by Pathumthani ♦32 |
| 170865537 (Comments: 4) | Btian Paul Dorsam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tesekkurler! commented 2025-08-23 12:12:18 UTC by Btian Paul Dorsam ♦1 |
| 170186911 (Comments: 2) | Tony Locke (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks DaveF. commented 2025-08-23 12:08:35 UTC by Tony Locke ♦7 |
| 170818547 (Comments: 1) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is a temporary bypass during construction. I would not add it to the permanent OSM data. commented 2025-08-23 11:57:39 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦382 |
| 160327130 (Comments: 5) | MichaelCollinson (Discussed changesets: 90) | I see that you have fixed that area by using the new information, which is a good thing. But still I point you to the tags here: osm.wiki/Tag%3Atourism%3Dhotel#As_a_campus to use as a better choice for landuse=accommodation (used 12 time... commented 2025-08-23 11:45:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170870768 (Comments: 3) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 16) | Danke für den Hinweis, die hatte ich übersehen, weil sie nicht direkt an der Straße liegen. Werde ich gleich nachreichen! commented 2025-08-23 11:37:14 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦24 |
 | 169196710 (Comments: 1) | kekspetrovich (Discussed changesets: 3) | you forgot the 11955525570, dear. commented 2025-08-23 11:29:53 UTC by McKulkin ♦17 |
| 170812453 (Comments: 2) | TrueSpearmint (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHxdeZzM там же написано, что въезд только по пропускам motor_vehicle=private commented 2025-08-23 11:28:17 UTC by literan ♦6,755 |
| 170871845 (Comments: 1) | Eymeinnysf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merhaba. Bazı yolların etiketlerini secondary'den primary'e çevirmişsiniz. Değişikliklerinizin doğru olduğuna emin misiniz? Lütfen şu sayfaları inceleyiniz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging... commented 2025-08-23 11:26:46 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦67 |
| 170406455 (Comments: 2) | Orlovklg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted @Orlovklg нужны подробности о месте, которое вы хотели добавить. Страница в соцсетях или сайт были очень полезны commented 2025-08-23 11:23:08 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,036 |
| 169320498 (Comments: 4) | itamas80 (Discussed changesets: 13) | A Kálvin téri peronokat javítottam is. commented 2025-08-23 11:22:26 UTC by gymate ♦35 |
| 170825604 (Comments: 1) | UnknownApple12 (Discussed changesets: 3) | вроде это грот, и он уже отмечен commented 2025-08-23 11:22:01 UTC by literan ♦6,755 |
| 169195627 (Comments: 1) | kekspetrovich (Discussed changesets: 3) | Have you done the trail? Adding surface and smoothness info would be a plus. commented 2025-08-23 11:19:07 UTC by McKulkin ♦17 |
| 146886001 (Comments: 2) | CycleAlex (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, this location was flagged up by Sustrans (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/differences-between-osm-and-sustrans-mapping-of-the-uk-national-cycle-network/134337) as a place where the data in the Sustrans GIS on where they think NCN1 runs does... commented 2025-08-23 11:18:30 UTC by osmuser63783 ♦64 |
| 170873887 (Comments: 1) | Eymeinnysf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Lütfen geçmişi koruyunuz. Otogar binasını silmişsiniz. Binada değişiklik yapacaksanız mevcut nesneyi silmeden, nesnenein düğümlerini kaydırarak yapınız. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the... commented 2025-08-23 11:14:20 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦67 |
| 170758802 (Comments: 2) | hildgyorgy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, these are actually caravan zones with numbered pitches. That's why I thought not to use camp pitch. Even the icon of the camp pitch is a tent and that can be misleading. What do you suggest to properly indicate that this area is divided into... commented 2025-08-23 10:53:48 UTC by hildgyorgy ♦6 |
| 170377573 (Comments: 3) | Alexander5283 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Снимки Google нельзя использовать для рисования в OSM commented 2025-08-23 10:50:08 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,036 |
| 169047771 (Comments: 2) | Golub' (Discussed changesets: 1) | кавычки тоже не надо ставить commented 2025-08-23 10:48:07 UTC by literan ♦6,755 |
| 170872381 (Comments: 1) | Joachim Z (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-23 10:32:51 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170866605 (Comments: 1) | K@@s (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-23 10:31:12 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170803032 (Comments: 2) | Zeymedya Reklam Ajansı istanbul Reklam Ajanslari Dijital Pazarlama Ajansi Seo Ajansi Sosyal Medya Ajansi 360 Reklam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170871336 commented 2025-08-23 10:00:30 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170866545 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 347) | revert own changeset Wijzigingenset #170870831 commented 2025-08-23 09:50:07 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170866607 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 347) | revert own changeset Wijzigingenset #170870792 commented 2025-08-23 09:48:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170866719 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 347) | revert own changeset Wijzigingenset #170870751 commented 2025-08-23 09:47:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170869957 (Comments: 2) | PDGK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Została zmieniona tylko ich lokalizacja, nie wstawiałem ich. commented 2025-08-23 09:43:16 UTC by PDGK ♦2 |
 | 170856923 (Comments: 3) | ubahnverleih (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oh sorry, I will have a look how to group the edits with this tool. As I verified each match it was simple to apply them one by one. But I think it should be possible to group them. Or is anything other wrong with this tool? commented 2025-08-23 09:39:30 UTC by ubahnverleih ♦12 |
| 169199070 (Comments: 1) | TanujaPalivela (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Thanks for mapping. On this task, the high-rise buildings are incorrect mapped. You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more . Often all visible walls and roo... commented 2025-08-23 09:32:43 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170857007 (Comments: 1) | Amelia Harper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Amelia What sources are using for these edits as your US locale suggests you are not UK based and seem to be adding a lot of tourist accommodation. This appears to be a single apartment within a large building, the entire building, no... commented 2025-08-23 09:31:28 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,384 |
| 170526874 (Comments: 2) | Rangerdienst Landschaftspark Wiese (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi Johsin18 Ja, der Akatzienweg ist so gesperrt wie es in der Publikation angegeben ist (und jeweils steht schon an den Kreuzungen in die Zufahrtswege ein Fahr-/resp. Betretverbot, das jedoch um den Hinweis ergänzt ist, dass der Zutritt bis ... commented 2025-08-23 09:28:02 UTC by Rangerdienst Landschaftspark Wiese ♦3 |
| 170733817 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-23 09:26:11 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 17072808 (Comments: 3) | dachefte (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ok, I think I misunderstood things commented 2025-08-23 09:20:20 UTC by mdornseif ♦1 |
| 170268940 (Comments: 5) | Amelia Harper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Should this be reverted? commented 2025-08-23 09:09:59 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,384 |
| 170552046 (Comments: 5) | Timo Herker (Discussed changesets: 4) | Schaut gut aus, Danke. commented 2025-08-23 09:09:05 UTC by martinst ♦325 |
| 170868077 (Comments: 2) | PDGK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Poprawione commented 2025-08-23 09:05:42 UTC by PDGK ♦2 |
| 170868232 (Comments: 1) | One Miners (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-23 09:02:09 UTC by Comino ♦120 |
| 169386555 (Comments: 2) | G_Err (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh, good point. It seems I have used the wrong tag. I will change them to light:power when I get a chance. Thanks. commented 2025-08-23 08:56:19 UTC by G_Err ♦1 |
| 170867784 (Comments: 1) | Sapphire___ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Sapphire, In zo'n geval kun je het beste om import vragen via het forum van OSM in het draadje BAG importverzoeken. Dan komen de juiste afmetingen en data mee. https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43 Een ... commented 2025-08-23 08:55:12 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170436653 (Comments: 1) | D R Syfydrin (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hi, "gap=yes" is a tag that is not used in other places. What does it mean? commented 2025-08-23 08:46:42 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 170849584 (Comments: 3) | Sambalbij (Discussed changesets: 2) | Top! commented 2025-08-23 08:46:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170863955 (Comments: 1) | Hlav (Discussed changesets: 30) | It's nice that you edit OpenStreetMap, but I would ask you to limit changes in one set of changes to one region, then, for example, it wouldn't bother people interested in Poland, thank you commented 2025-08-23 08:43:59 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170867236 (Comments: 1) | Bicyclemind (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-23 08:41:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170852055 (Comments: 1) | Gummiphone (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Gummyphone.. Je vraagt feedback. Probeer plakken van landuse en/of grenzen te voorkomen. Wanneer je schuift met de kaart verplaats je ook ongemertkt opbjecten zoals adressen en bomen. Dat is hier ook gebeurd. Zie https://overpass-... commented 2025-08-23 08:24:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 73471023 (Comments: 1) | tubalpes (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72558969/history/2 : est-ce vraiment un musée ? Si oui, de quoi ? commented 2025-08-23 08:18:18 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦212 |
| 170739900 (Comments: 5) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 273) | Yeah, I will fix. commented 2025-08-23 08:11:27 UTC by Rogoyski ♦225 |
| 170278501 (Comments: 2) | Lena199 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Keine Reaktion, Weg wiederhergestellt und "access=private" gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170865300. commented 2025-08-23 08:11:17 UTC by aixbrick ♦850 |
| 170865025 (Comments: 1) | Cristoffs (Discussed changesets: 124) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13092006069 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-08-23 08:10:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170830351 (Comments: 3) | Gummiphone (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hier meer referentie info over wijken & buurten in Rotterdam: https://allecijfers.nl/gemeente-overzicht/rotterdam/ commented 2025-08-23 08:09:22 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦38 |
| 170854430 (Comments: 1) | StartSelectAdam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1131621528. You forgot the (main) key highway=service. I have already corrected this. commented 2025-08-23 07:59:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 134499665 (Comments: 2) | redrace (Discussed changesets: 57) | Danke! Hab ich soweit korrigiert! commented 2025-08-23 07:45:26 UTC by redrace ♦159 |
| 90124754 (Comments: 2) | Chenshi (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hat sich wohl erledigt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170258093 commented 2025-08-23 07:35:50 UTC by GerdP ♦2,762 |
| 170860470 (Comments: 1) | maikhanht (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11936159556 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-08-23 07:30:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
 | 78093970 (Comments: 2) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hey there, well spotted, maybe i got confused while adding the takeaway=only. But this was 5 years ago and today we have to check if it's still open (website is down). commented 2025-08-23 07:23:49 UTC by sheldonelectric ♦180 |
 | 170784704 (Comments: 1) | Tharhtetaung (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thanks for your addition! But please note that the key Building is unknown. Instead of Building=Stupa building=yes, write building=stupa. commented 2025-08-23 07:03:50 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170653985 (Comments: 5) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 106) | cyleway:both=no wurde nun restauriert. commented 2025-08-23 07:01:52 UTC by chris66 ♦382 |
| 98983108 (Comments: 3) | thiofrid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Theo, vielen Dank für deine ausführliche Erläuterung! VG Jan commented 2025-08-23 06:50:20 UTC by schueszel ♦15 |
| 169952769 (Comments: 2) | yoann_immergis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour yoann_immergis, Petite question de cohérence concernant la voie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25968915. Y a-t-il vraiment un pictogramme de vélo au sol et si oui pourquoi pas sur le tronçon suivant https://www.... commented 2025-08-23 06:44:25 UTC by Patchi ♦132 |
| 168238442 (Comments: 3) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 175) | Opgelost. Ik ben momenteel bezig om overduidelijke typefouten en/of foutieve tags langs te lopen en op te lossen (waar mogelijk), maar kijk niet altijd alle oudere changesets terug (sommige 10+ jaar oud). Dan komt er wel eens iets op iemands bordj... commented 2025-08-23 06:40:17 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170766320 (Comments: 1) | plamen (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1423835269. What is the mean of the tags AREA = 113.26865299906 PERIM = 45.354135842585 appcount = 0 cadbuild = 1 cadimm = 156 cadnum = 10135.2563.156.1 cadreg = 2563 ekatte... commented 2025-08-23 06:38:50 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170859393 (Comments: 1) | trung791997 (Discussed changesets: 1) | What's the source for these maxspeed edits? Do you have any documentation about the "NERF Map Editor?" commented 2025-08-23 06:35:39 UTC by citrula ♦897 |
| 170852760 (Comments: 1) | Gummiphone (Discussed changesets: 4) | Beste Een quarter heeft een andere definitie in vergelijking tot een neighbourhood. Een 'quarter' kan meerder 'neighbourhoods' bevatten. Zou je nog eens kunnen kijken naar het verwijderen van de buurtnamen? <... commented 2025-08-23 06:23:08 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170846974 (Comments: 3) | Germiyoshi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Das hilft schonmal. Optimal wäre zu wissen, wie die Beschilderung aus der anderen Richtung aussieht (das ist leider oft nicht einheitlich und macht es uns schwerer). Bis wir das wissen ... commented 2025-08-23 06:21:46 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 170852876 (Comments: 1) | Gummiphone (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Gummiphone, Het zal best anders kunnen zijn dan het was gemapt tot nu toe, maar........ Volgens mij is in een quarter nog plaats van neighbourhood https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dquarter en https://w... commented 2025-08-23 06:19:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 149024569 (Comments: 3) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 95) | 👍 commented 2025-08-23 06:07:11 UTC by emvee ♦378 |
| 170812203 (Comments: 1) | Julien39 (Discussed changesets: 99) | Bonjour Julien39, Je ne suis pas sur que la modification de la ligne maitre de bus 5 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9091034) et la ligne de bus 5 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9091032) à Saint-Raphaël soient corr... commented 2025-08-23 06:05:04 UTC by Patchi ♦132 |
 | 157818335 (Comments: 1) | J&T_anipmint (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18650 commented 2025-08-23 06:02:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 168378016 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This description was poorly worded. This edit was me finishing my rebuilding of the track ways to Eltham station. commented 2025-08-23 06:01:30 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦22 |
| 170854633 (Comments: 1) | iamthestenmand (Discussed changesets: 1) | Flyvepladsen er lukket. I dag ser området således ud: https://ibb.co/KzKgSJvd - revertet commented 2025-08-23 05:56:35 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,671 |
| 168379220 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This edit was me further attempting to reorder a relation to a correct order. commented 2025-08-23 05:51:09 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦22 |
| 170772341 (Comments: 1) | Elina Jeon (Discussed changesets: 2) | With this edit, & also the one for Paldo Market, could you please tell us where you got the name and address details from? You have only listed Bing Imagery as your source, which can't give you these details? Thanks! commented 2025-08-23 05:44:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170832520 (Comments: 1) | user_16522352 (Discussed changesets: 17) | 1. Please use at most `old_name=` , and add these to OpenHistoricalMap instead 2. This doesn't seem to have a confirmed location commented 2025-08-23 05:43:44 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,583 |
 | 170772492 (Comments: 1) | Elina Jeon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, & welcome to OSM! Unfortunately there's a bit of an issue with this CS as you have mapped a number of actual schools, not school buildings! Could you please edit them all to be building=school? Thanks! commented 2025-08-23 05:40:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170804001 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18649 commented 2025-08-23 05:28:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 168145130 (Comments: 2) | 目立たない (Discussed changesets: 11) | You've already been warned. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162726371 commented 2025-08-23 04:51:01 UTC by Lejun ♦490 |
| 170859239 (Comments: 1) | astersuperix (Discussed changesets: 1) | didn't work for some reason will try again commented 2025-08-23 04:35:24 UTC by astersuperix ♦1 |
| 169906902 (Comments: 1) | Atanas Angelov (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18648 commented 2025-08-23 03:46:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170826920 (Comments: 1) | srkbrmx (Discussed changesets: 3) | Isn't it at least a local name or a nickname? It's in common use afaik. commented 2025-08-23 03:45:47 UTC by kingkingHK ♦6 |
| 170825063 (Comments: 1) | typhoonom (Discussed changesets: 1) | 重覆加了，已經有了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529816026 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170825063 commented 2025-08-23 03:38:04 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,472 |
| 170827326 (Comments: 1) | Kacper Musiał (Discussed changesets: 1) | Przy edycji proszę uważać na inne obiekty ponieważ został przesunięty słupek pikietażowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3046267520 Przywróciłem go do pierwotnego położenia. commented 2025-08-23 03:37:18 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦513 |
| 169104848 (Comments: 2) | deanleggo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks commented 2025-08-23 03:16:06 UTC by deanleggo ♦3 |
 | 170857895 (Comments: 1) | Nien-En (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183001662 It is duplicated Linkou Junior High School, I will remove the landuse=education --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170857895 ... commented 2025-08-23 03:03:14 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,472 |
| 159976341 (Comments: 1) | mdonmap (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi. I am reverting this changeset because Pease is a well-defined area with a consistent name, and therefore belongs in OpenStreetMap as a place= node. If you think a different place= value should be used, please explain why. Please note that the def... commented 2025-08-23 02:47:13 UTC by AntiCompositeNumber ♦32 |
| 170856443 (Comments: 1) | UnGrosBrun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, la communauté Québecoise désire utiliser les noms francophones pour les opérateurs. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170857543 commented 2025-08-23 02:21:07 UTC by wolfy1339 ♦26 |
| 170135189 (Comments: 3) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 17) | Yeah, it's no problem really. It's my fault for not adding a lifecycle prefix. I did that now so it shouldn't happen again :D commented 2025-08-23 01:55:55 UTC by Potatoleum ♦2 |
| 170796728 (Comments: 2) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 50) | Thanks for reaching out. This is a new tag I'm just experimenting with. I'm not satisfied with my initial round of `landmark` values (they're too low) but the idea is to have a way to convey notability for maps and search. Open to feed... commented 2025-08-23 01:37:10 UTC by quincylvania ♦57 |
| 170797500 (Comments: 2) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 50) | Thanks for reaching out. This is a new tag I'm just experimenting with. I'm not satisfied with my initial round of `landmark` values (they're too low) but the idea is to have a way to convey notability for maps and search. Open to feed... commented 2025-08-23 01:36:42 UTC by quincylvania ♦57 |
| 169118742 (Comments: 1) | lukobe (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ways 1415684477 and 78 should be highway=footway and footway=sidewalk instead of highway=path. I've made the necessary changes commented 2025-08-23 00:47:44 UTC by Cookie Guru ♦6 |
| 170774821 (Comments: 2) | Fowler High Precision (Discussed changesets: 4) | PLease see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18647 commented 2025-08-23 00:40:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170592298 (Comments: 2) | King Kongin1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18646 commented 2025-08-23 00:12:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170743347 (Comments: 1) | Schank Group LLC (Discussed changesets: 3) | I have created a note to allow for discussion on this topic. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4924589 commented 2025-08-23 00:11:15 UTC by Ezra Jenks ♦7 |
| 170802811 (Comments: 2) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ahoj, ja nemením veci, ktoré som reálne nenavštívil. Čo sa týka príkladu č. 1 – áno, viem, že ten prechod na Ľavobrežnej je zrušený. Viem, že je tam z jednej str... commented 2025-08-22 23:28:04 UTC by Ajper ♦3 |
| 170846818 (Comments: 1) | FadedGiant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Related to your review request, the foot path (w630726452) that you tagged as "access=no" would be better tagged as "access=private", with an additional tag of "private=employees". Tagging it with "incline=down"... commented 2025-08-22 22:56:54 UTC by caseywittmier ♦9 |
| 170853952 (Comments: 1) | VLD280 (Discussed changesets: 8) | sidewalk:*=no is implied on highway=motorway_link. commented 2025-08-22 22:42:37 UTC by Udarian ♦445 |
| 169608990 (Comments: 1) | Udo Lorczyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wurde hier absichtlich "boundary=administrative" aus der Grenzrelation von Dossenheim rausgelöscht und "type=boundary" in "site" geändert? commented 2025-08-22 22:41:19 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦74 |
| 170641389 (Comments: 2) | Javnik (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dzięki, zająłem się tym :) commented 2025-08-22 22:15:02 UTC by Javnik ♦7 |
| 170853661 (Comments: 1) | Javnik (Discussed changesets: 10) | Uh, pierwszy mini-rewert i już coś nie tak, na szczęście obyło się bez większej wtopy (zapomniałem zaznaczyć 1 waya 😅) commented 2025-08-22 22:14:07 UTC by Javnik ♦7 |
| 170791319 (Comments: 2) | OutlawBunny (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj na OSM! Dzięki za zaangażowanie. Parę pytań/uwag co do edycji: 1. Równoległa na płd.-zach. od budowanego ronda z Szybką nie jest już przejezdna? Zdaje sobię sprawę, że jest w przebudowie, ale zmieniając tagi na "hi... commented 2025-08-22 22:13:05 UTC by Javnik ♦7 |
| 170851476 (Comments: 1) | Soeb00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-22 22:04:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170814682 (Comments: 1) | Tom Walker 78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | What is this place of worship? commented 2025-08-22 21:39:21 UTC by bartgron ♦217 |
| 149442877 (Comments: 1) | Mabap (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I wonder how you came to the surface of road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552912664 . It is not visible on imagery from 2023 and at survey this year (2025) there is barely any footway, at most a path in grass. So really how did you see a set... commented 2025-08-22 21:26:17 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 161806254 (Comments: 1) | Iveta_vas (Discussed changesets: 6) | Fulton Market is the name on street signs for this section, which you can see in Streetside imagery. It's also used on the official Chicago GIS maps: https://gisapps.chicago.gov/mapchicago commented 2025-08-22 21:01:31 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 170848240 (Comments: 2) | Institute for Justice (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you can identify the brand of the ALPR you might also find the DeFlock documentation about how to add manufacturer information helpful: https://deflock.me/report/id commented 2025-08-22 20:48:41 UTC by citrula ♦897 |
| 170728989 (Comments: 2) | irik (Discussed changesets: 36) | Poprawione, dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi! commented 2025-08-22 20:14:15 UTC by irik ♦45 |
 | 170838969 (Comments: 1) | AlexanderVolk8 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Привет! Спасибо за добавление объектов на карту. В будущем постарайтесь избегать правок с таким большим географическим разбросом об... commented 2025-08-22 20:09:43 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
| 130225271 (Comments: 2) | ALu68 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Du hast das angelegt. Bitte äußere Dich. Danke und Grüße commented 2025-08-22 19:58:43 UTC by Scout Jens ♦280 |
| 170846102 (Comments: 1) | BlauweFietsKetting (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-22 19:52:03 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 168570601 (Comments: 1) | Jiří Šimon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, jen chci upozornit, že čas se zadává specifickým způsobem (viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:opening_hours), jinak jsou pro programy nečitelné. Také si dávejte pozor na to abyste z budo... commented 2025-08-22 19:49:00 UTC by comfyquiettree ♦31 |
 | 144887733 (Comments: 2) | OSM19WVL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221681452/history/2 you have amenity=DWLLING What does that stand for? commented 2025-08-22 19:47:23 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170824729 (Comments: 1) | SimonBuchberger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10926207931 hast du jetzt einen bestehenden Hydranten mit der Straße verbunden. Ich möchte dich bitten, das zu unterlassen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-22 19:44:00 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170824922 (Comments: 1) | SimonBuchberger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, ich möchte meine Bitte noch einmal wiederholen: Hydranten werden nicht mit der Straße verbunden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-22 19:39:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170849654 (Comments: 1) | JLZIMMERMANN (Discussed changesets: 49) | j'ai rétabli en CD84 car c'est ainsi qu'il y a moins de risque d'erreur pour les requêtes tous les conseils départementaux se nomment ainsi en abrégé commented 2025-08-22 19:35:16 UTC by JLZIMMERMANN ♦116 |
| 148201078 (Comments: 1) | pittrichimica (Discussed changesets: 71) | Hi, here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268664173/history/2 You changed building from "yes" to "ss" What does that mean? (You did so on multiple other edits in this region). Marc. commented 2025-08-22 19:33:14 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170167929 (Comments: 2) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 49) | Sollte wahrscheinlich "Detail" heißen. Schau es Dir doch an. commented 2025-08-22 19:27:23 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦21 |
| 170821792 (Comments: 1) | Gonzo1192 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen: colour: Festwerte sind englisch definiert, hier also „red“ statt „Rot“. cou... commented 2025-08-22 19:26:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 169205239 (Comments: 3) | Atanas Angelov (Discussed changesets: 16) | Agreed, have submitted a report this evening. commented 2025-08-22 19:11:21 UTC by mstrbrid ♦42 |
| 170812134 (Comments: 1) | John-Carroll (Discussed changesets: 1) | Food trucks should be tagged as street_vendor=yes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3Dyes for more details on how to tag. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-08-22 19:11:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 168758657 (Comments: 1) | Atanas Angelov (Discussed changesets: 16) | Are cyclists permitted to go the other direction here?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152262096 commented 2025-08-22 19:09:52 UTC by mstrbrid ♦42 |
| 153635546 (Comments: 1) | youbab (Discussed changesets: 25) | Vous avez ajouté destination = Montargis;Paris;Chartres destination:int_ref = E 5; E 60 destination:ref = A 10 à plusieurs voies. Ça semble incorrect. commented 2025-08-22 19:05:53 UTC by sostock ♦4 |
| 170830839 (Comments: 3) | hmkaiser (Discussed changesets: 99) | Hallo, vielen Dank für die schnelle Anpassung. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-22 19:05:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170810096 (Comments: 1) | jacktz1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The landuse residential + residential=suburban would be better just as landuse=residential. A suburban is usually a much larger area. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170810096 |
| 170809846 (Comments: 1) | jacktz1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | It would help adding the type of business is located inside of the building such as amenity=casino. Also, it Casino the actual name of the business? Seems rather generic. --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-08-22 18:59:27 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170809912 (Comments: 1) | Thezkial (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809912 commented 2025-08-22 18:56:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170809398 (Comments: 1) | Thezkial (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809398 commented 2025-08-22 18:56:23 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170810323 (Comments: 1) | Thezkial (Discussed changesets: 3) | It looks more like a highway=service instead of a living street, which is very unusual in the US. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170810323 ... commented 2025-08-22 18:56:16 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170809196 (Comments: 1) | mparasa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding a name. Can you also add a tag to describe what kind of business The Heights Learning Center does? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809196 commented 2025-08-22 18:52:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170809587 (Comments: 1) | mparasa (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: Instead of adding a building inside of an existing building, just add a node for the business. Can you fix this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809587 commented 2025-08-22 18:51:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170808344 (Comments: 1) | hmerritt (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: when multiple business occupy a building, just add a node for each business. Can you restore the building to its original shape and add nodes for the business? --- Published using OSMCha: https://os... commented 2025-08-22 18:47:30 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
 | 170801784 (Comments: 2) | topodelapradera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, y gracias por la aclaración. commented 2025-08-22 18:44:25 UTC by topodelapradera ♦1 |
| 170808029 (Comments: 1) | Samson Kidane (Discussed changesets: 1) | If the church is the only occupant of a building, just tag the building outline. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170808029 commented 2025-08-22 18:44:20 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170805584 (Comments: 1) | sirwillphil (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170805584 commented 2025-08-22 18:38:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170780175 (Comments: 3) | VáclavS (Discussed changesets: 19) | route_marker mapy.cz nezobrazujú. Ale zobrazuje ho napríklad freemap.sk https://www.freemap.sk/#map=19/48.924899/20.542049&layers=X&osm-node=10180137408 commented 2025-08-22 18:35:12 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170802270 (Comments: 1) | Pepper Cross (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170802270 commented 2025-08-22 18:34:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170296177 (Comments: 4) | bhmaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Das könnte man jetzt divers diskutieren, ob der Betreiber derjenige ist, der das Ganze verantwortet - oder der, der die praktische Umsetzung durchführt. (Mir ist das tatsächlich egal und brauche den Operator nicht wirklich.) Der zwe... commented 2025-08-22 18:33:53 UTC by pyram ♦506 |
| 170800098 (Comments: 1) | Rome Zucati (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170800098 commented 2025-08-22 18:33:52 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170779699 (Comments: 3) | VáclavS (Discussed changesets: 19) | Vďaka :) commented 2025-08-22 18:33:30 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170841750 (Comments: 3) | IT Systems Consulting Inc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170847237 (illegal source). commented 2025-08-22 18:31:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170825212 (Comments: 4) | MMNTL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Duidelijk. Dank Eggie! commented 2025-08-22 18:30:42 UTC by MMNTL ♦2 |
| 170793002 (Comments: 1) | YesJaTakDaSiOui (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте, уточните пожалуйста, это "5-я поляна" или 6? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423942224 commented 2025-08-22 18:22:36 UTC by Grass-snake ♦236 |
| 170770354 (Comments: 2) | michieldevries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Eggie, met de studie jaren geleden kennis gemaakt met OpenStreetMap en raakte weer geïnteresseerd. Deze straat heeft inderdaad geen straatlantaarns. Groet, MIchiel commented 2025-08-22 18:20:49 UTC by michieldevries ♦1 |
| 170791792 (Comments: 3) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola James. Siento de verdad que nos digas esto. No es para nada la idea de que dejes de mapear si de verdad te interesa. Estamos para ayudarte y pasa con todos que necesitan asistencia al principio. TODOS. Pasa también que ha... commented 2025-08-22 18:18:15 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170843469 (Comments: 1) | abysonta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. With access on foot, cycle, horse and motor vehicle being allowed, it cannot be that access is by permission. With the rest of Brewer Way being residential I would assume this short section would also be residenti... commented 2025-08-22 17:57:19 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,896 |
| 169524343 (Comments: 3) | Bamamba85 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks Bamamba, but you're doing it again. See https://www.osm.org/way/1423871476 for another example. commented 2025-08-22 17:44:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170796739 (Comments: 1) | jschutz (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423958947 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines sh... commented 2025-08-22 17:40:39 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170350622 (Comments: 1) | Сергаван (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2025-08-22 17:35:44 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,036 |
| 170753934 (Comments: 1) | blot27 (Discussed changesets: 3) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13015737063 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines s... commented 2025-08-22 17:35:43 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170844171 (Comments: 1) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 1) | sidewalk:*=no is implied on motorway's and motorway_link's. commented 2025-08-22 17:32:02 UTC by Udarian ♦445 |
 | 170768436 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 862) | I completely missed that, but fixed it now. You can always search for things like this using overpass: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ane and from there load it to your editor of choice. commented 2025-08-22 17:27:58 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 147750453 (Comments: 1) | ti_rey_531 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo ti_rey, Du hast hier am Landecker diverse Wege nach DGM1 geändert, ohne auch mal einen Blick auf das absurde Tagging zu werfen, das vom User Biosphärenreservat Rhön stammt, wie bereits an anderer Stelle festgestellt. |
| 170833281 (Comments: 2) | webmaster Voorthuizen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Feedback Beter geen name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven \tToeristisch Informatie Punt (pipowagen) Denk dat Pipowagen evt onder description= kan. Wanneer je adresnodes aanpast heb je kans dat één adres uit de data is verdwen... commented 2025-08-22 16:42:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170841928 (Comments: 1) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | *chodziło o foot=yes commented 2025-08-22 16:41:28 UTC by driedfish ♦3 |
 | 170797438 (Comments: 1) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 12) | Trek ini terlalu banyak vertices, harap gunakan simplify tool. commented 2025-08-22 16:40:37 UTC by FajrAl ♦97 |
 | 170838994 (Comments: 5) | Wendi F (Discussed changesets: 28) | I just moved here and it looks like these roads haven't been updated in years, so you may see more changes as I explore since there's been a lot of development/new houses/neighbourhoods commented 2025-08-22 16:34:19 UTC by Wendi F ♦1 |
| 170488762 (Comments: 1) | Yari6889 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ottimo, grazie mille! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170488762 commented 2025-08-22 16:33:29 UTC by Mannivu ♦228 |
| 170611388 (Comments: 2) | Marco Filipazzi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ho sistemato anche il parcheggio perché era doppio rispetto all'area già indicata in precedenza --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170611388 commented 2025-08-22 16:33:12 UTC by Mannivu ♦228 |
| 170615967 (Comments: 1) | Beretz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ottimo, grazie mille! Come mappatura preliminare è più che ottima! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170615967 commented 2025-08-22 16:30:41 UTC by Mannivu ♦228 |
| 170692076 (Comments: 1) | LeoK_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Grazie, in effetti dalle immagini satellitari non compare --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170692076 commented 2025-08-22 16:29:46 UTC by Mannivu ♦228 |
| 170841010 (Comments: 1) | MattHodge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-22 16:29:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170692588 (Comments: 1) | LeoK_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Grazie per la modifica! Ho notato che nella trasposizione qualche tag è andato perso o è stato modificato (come per esempio access che da yes è diventato unknown). Li ho ripristinati. --- ... commented 2025-08-22 16:29:20 UTC by Mannivu ♦228 |
| 170749983 (Comments: 1) | TommyEnglish (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-22 16:13:49 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦122 |
| 170831477 (Comments: 4) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Prima... Veel mapplezier. eggie commented 2025-08-22 16:08:10 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170838570 (Comments: 1) | DullKnifeInDrawer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Dull.... Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adfesnode. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-22 16:06:05 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170833658 (Comments: 1) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Chris.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-22 15:58:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 52074517 (Comments: 1) | Aurimas Fišeras (Discussed changesets: 37) | Should add that it is also a campsite for tents. Searching for that category in Oruxmaps didn't show the place for me. commented 2025-08-22 15:57:19 UTC by Schmuppes ♦4 |
 | 168560661 (Comments: 1) | Erick tamba (Discussed changesets: 256) | Hi Erick, I was just wondering why you had *that* many changes on a few days and had a look at those buildings. That precision is a wee bit too much ;) Nodes are about once real-world centimeter apart and one building ends up having several hundre... commented 2025-08-22 15:55:32 UTC by mbethke ♦411 |
| 170832734 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 336) | Jeg har lagt mærke til at når du retter på huse i et område, at der er mange huse som ikke bliver rørt ved, men stadig tæller i dit changeset. Jeg er blevet nysgerrig, og vil gerne vide hvad dit workflow er, der k... commented 2025-08-22 15:37:09 UTC by drkt ♦42 |
| 170831688 (Comments: 1) | gerooktemakreel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Weet je ook het uitgebreide nummer? We taggen normaliter op de bestaande adresnodes bij. MVG, Eggie Namen... commented 2025-08-22 15:32:50 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 54369767 (Comments: 2) | TheParadoxMuse (Discussed changesets: 1) | The term "sidewalk" is not really appropriate for the paths across campus. The wiki says: "What is considered a sidewalk Generally any walkway running parallel to the road, which provides an alternative method of travel along the ro... commented 2025-08-22 15:24:04 UTC by aduxas ♦34 |
| 54375020 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 369) | The term "sidewalk" is not really appropriate for the paths across campus. The wiki says: "What is considered a sidewalk Generally any walkway running parallel to the road, which provides an alternative method of travel along the r... commented 2025-08-22 15:21:25 UTC by aduxas ♦34 |
| 170616222 (Comments: 2) | Balborum (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Lezurex I didn't know that. Thanks for looking out and letting me know :) commented 2025-08-22 15:14:26 UTC by Balborum ♦3 |
| 170617527 (Comments: 2) | Balborum (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Lezurex Fixed it. Sorry about that commented 2025-08-22 15:04:29 UTC by Balborum ♦3 |
| 170792105 (Comments: 2) | Sapphire___ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Recently I drove past it on my bicycle. I originally set out a course on Komoot, but I happened to see a Privatweg sign, prompting me not to enter that road. The road there starts asphalted, but then turns into a landweg that is not... commented 2025-08-22 14:55:42 UTC by Sapphire___ ♦1 |
| 170171382 (Comments: 1) | Malinovsky (Discussed changesets: 11) | `amenity=events_venue` nie oznacza samo w sobie stricte sali bankietowej, musiało zostać nieprecyzyjnie przetłumaczone commented 2025-08-22 14:51:01 UTC by dzamper ♦134 |
| 170769056 (Comments: 2) | Hopla57 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Vu. Il y a bien eu une radiation visible dans le BODACC : https://www.bodacc.fr/pages/annonces-commerciales-detail/?q.id=id:B202101941686 Cependant, un établissement (le même ?) a été créé à la su... commented 2025-08-22 14:38:56 UTC by Hopla57 ♦47 |
| 170742472 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | I am extremely skeptical that this is actually a landuse=forest area. And even if it were, the operator is in all caps, that needs fixing. Is that a double-space in the operator on Clark Park? --- ... commented 2025-08-22 14:27:00 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 170744206 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | parkview already exists as an amenity feature. please check a little closer before adding a new feature --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170744206 commented 2025-08-22 14:17:17 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 170792595 (Comments: 1) | sirsir (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoe werken belijningen? Er zijn wel haaientanden en een loonstrook waar de twee banen bij elkaar komen. Maar er is een fysieke baan scheiding hier commented 2025-08-22 14:16:42 UTC by sirsir ♦1 |
| 170613026 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 453) | Usunąłem już. commented 2025-08-22 14:13:01 UTC by tsp15 ♦52 |
| 170115036 (Comments: 1) | MountWutai (Discussed changesets: 8) | mostly reverted with this edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170833960 No need to invent some non-existent canals, to relocate some nodes or no create some unspecified crossings of roads and fences just to resolve some warnings! commented 2025-08-22 14:05:13 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170816030 (Comments: 1) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Is it really a general store? commented 2025-08-22 14:04:16 UTC by kingkingHK ♦6 |
| 170115027 (Comments: 1) | OgdenRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | partly reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170833960 No need to relocate node to due some stupid validation warnings! commented 2025-08-22 14:03:05 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170007881 (Comments: 1) | MountWutai (Discussed changesets: 8) | properly fixed in this edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170833960 commented 2025-08-22 14:02:27 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170759517 (Comments: 1) | ross-map (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi Could you please check this version 1 way which has no tags and correct or remove. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423811576#map=19/42.449322/13.881823 thanks commented 2025-08-22 13:56:34 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,446 |
| X | 170830055 (Comments: 1) | fullsoul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello fullsoul, thank you for contributing to HOT and thus to OSM. There are two things I'd like you to improve in your work: - please do not delete and then redraw objekts that only need moving. The rule here is called &quo... commented 2025-08-22 13:47:10 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
 | 12117349 (Comments: 1) | jonalta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi jonalta, I noticed you added a ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170188925) in Malaysia. Ferry routes generally start and end at an amenity=ferry_terminal but this route doesn’t appear to connect to a ferry terminal at either... commented 2025-08-22 13:46:56 UTC by aaronq227 ♦11 |
| 170782761 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 115) | whoops, this changeset wasn't meant to include the crossing stuff. fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/170832999 commented 2025-08-22 13:44:45 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦392 |
| X | 170800157 (Comments: 2) | rbtosm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello rbtosm, what fellow mapper ilias_ possibly wishes to say is: It does look like you forgot to upload your quests before moving to another place to survey using StreetComplete. This created a rather large bbox which then showed up i... commented 2025-08-22 13:38:57 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 170744593 (Comments: 3) | silversurfer83 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung. Gruss wies1 commented 2025-08-22 13:36:18 UTC by wies1 ♦154 |
| 156275749 (Comments: 2) | jakobend (Discussed changesets: 8) | Moin! Ich habe zwischen Barrien und Syke auch nur Gehweg+"Radverkehr frei" gefunden, frage mich aber, warum Du dann aus highway=footway ein hw=path gemacht hast. Laut wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanla... commented 2025-08-22 13:35:57 UTC by GerdP ♦2,762 |
| 170676257 (Comments: 2) | leobass (Discussed changesets: 13) | его попутно хорошо бы разбить на части, чтобы Бачуринскую улицу не пересекал commented 2025-08-22 13:32:47 UTC by literan ♦6,755 |
| 170809378 (Comments: 1) | Nellhunter (Discussed changesets: 2) | Malaghans Road is nowhere near here, either the location of this node or the address needs to change commented 2025-08-22 13:28:32 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦392 |
| 169895841 (Comments: 2) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 445) | Thanks! commented 2025-08-22 13:21:36 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,412 |
 | 170404194 (Comments: 1) | Tabea Schicktanz (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-08-22 13:18:58 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170784763 (Comments: 1) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 142) | Hi, Bad news: ANNCSU has an incompatible license with OSM called CC-BY 4.0, so you will have to revert the name changes you applied using this resource as base. Same goes for the addresses, to note that the positioning of the addresses is off... commented 2025-08-22 13:12:40 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,446 |
| 170831044 (Comments: 1) | -redacted- (Discussed changesets: 3) | This comment was meant to say "label bridge" commented 2025-08-22 13:06:53 UTC by -redacted- ♦4 |
| 165666881 (Comments: 2) | redfox_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dzień dobry ! I used to live in the area, and I added the tag “shop=cbd” because this place doesn't sell cannabis (if you're referring to the drug, in France, it's currently illegal), but rather products made from canna... commented 2025-08-22 12:55:14 UTC by redfox_ ♦12 |
| 170828742 (Comments: 3) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 commented 2025-08-22 12:54:17 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 166650146 (Comments: 1) | Agazzr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola: cuando el carril bus pertenece a otras vías (es decir, no está segregado físicamente), lo correcto es mapearlo mediante etiquetas en la vía principal (tal y como estaba hasta ahora). He cambiado el mapeado al estado ... commented 2025-08-22 12:50:41 UTC by Santi2222 ♦32 |
| 170763969 (Comments: 3) | nlitvinava_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | seems y'all were correct, and thank you for the prompt fix changeset in 170823353. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2025-08-22 12:49:16 UTC by Udarian ♦445 |
| 170826544 (Comments: 1) | OpenStreetBoy (Discussed changesets: 19) | Moin, du hast hier und auch schon in anderen Changesets das lcn=yes von einigen Wegen gelöscht, ist das dort nicht mehr ausgeschildert? Besten Gruß commented 2025-08-22 12:29:41 UTC by mgerken ♦73 |
| 170766832 (Comments: 2) | milet (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hallo, ich habe nicht gezielt Änderungen von dir Rückgängig gemacht sondern im ganzen Gebiet um Erlangen bearbeitet. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass in der Erlanger-Umgebung viele Löcher im Netz der unclassified-Straßen sind... commented 2025-08-22 12:29:30 UTC by milet ♦91 |
| 159878180 (Comments: 2) | Korgorr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Indeed, it's a ditch and not a stream — it's been corrected. Thanks for pointing it out! commented 2025-08-22 12:28:09 UTC by Korgorr ♦2 |
| 166056701 (Comments: 7) | sgalaxya71silver (Discussed changesets: 48) | Given that this place has two names, the new and the old, we should use both in separate tags. And it would be better to specify the village area as well. Do you have a photo or PDF file for the village area? commented 2025-08-22 12:27:46 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦422 |
| 170828354 (Comments: 1) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Chris, Je vraagt feedback Lijkt me oke. Dat zie je vaker dat die lokale url weer wijzigen. Ze doen het nu kennelijk op een andere manier. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 12:26:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170826431 (Comments: 1) | RZ Vitaal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je hebt de rendering van het gebouw verwijderd. Bedrijven taggen we bij op de adresnodes. Alleen een naam zal niets... commented 2025-08-22 12:16:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 159548715 (Comments: 3) | sgalaxya71silver (Discussed changesets: 48) | Keep going. You can even learn new tutorials from the OSM Wiki. There's always something new. commented 2025-08-22 12:15:40 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦422 |
| 162677542 (Comments: 3) | sgalaxya71silver (Discussed changesets: 48) | Wishing you good health. commented 2025-08-22 12:12:55 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦422 |
| 167172384 (Comments: 1) | OttoR (Discussed changesets: 65) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392089515/history/1 landuse=scree should be natural=scree! marc. commented 2025-08-22 12:06:03 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170122879 (Comments: 10) | Friendly_Ghost (Discussed changesets: 174) | Do you know the automated editing guidelines? You can find them in the wiki commented 2025-08-22 11:49:34 UTC by dieterdreist ♦849 |
| 170821767 (Comments: 1) | Tobsilette (Discussed changesets: 1) | Een heel mooi in kaart gebracht kanaal! commented 2025-08-22 11:44:00 UTC by michastubi ♦3 |
 | 170675078 (Comments: 1) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 28) | A tip on SABA use better/sharper imagery. This aerial is lined out on local grid. Do not use BING. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bes-eiland-saba-map-tag-discussie/134427 I did all the roads and building on the island on this grid. commented 2025-08-22 11:39:16 UTC by Allroads ♦427 |
| 170781834 (Comments: 2) | NTTrailsNTH (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Thanks for your comment - I'm a NT staff member and went out and walked the trail yesterday. I noted that there were signs on the path and also notes in OSM to say that there were closures to the footpath made in 2007. I'll make... commented 2025-08-22 11:37:14 UTC by NTTrailsNTH ♦1 |
| 170767402 (Comments: 1) | tkotnala_lyft (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi there, I reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170826288 because this area is an exhibition area, think fair grounds. It's main use is as a walking area for the red river ex so it's not a parking lot/sevice roads etc commented 2025-08-22 11:36:51 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦30 |
| 170794273 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-22 11:21:01 UTC by Comino ♦120 |
| 170806791 (Comments: 1) | Lucas Leiva de Castro (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-22 11:20:39 UTC by Comino ♦120 |
| 170406743 (Comments: 4) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-22 11:13:45 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170698627 (Comments: 1) | Wethma (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Check these issues A: Inaccurate mapping. Follow the rooflines more accurate. D: Connecting Nodes to other features. Do not connect node... commented 2025-08-22 10:58:02 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170823783 (Comments: 1) | Spicetree (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Better use the present addressnode, I merged your info. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-22 10:55:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
 | 170137035 (Comments: 1) | Wethma (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper. Please check the purpose of this project. Focus and map waterways and farmland areas. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-22 10:52:46 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170813154 (Comments: 1) | nwdgrp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You are NOT a church! Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170823946. For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-08-22 10:47:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170823651 (Comments: 1) | Przemyslaw | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-22 10:41:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170822705 (Comments: 1) | Eloitor (Discussed changesets: 1) | hola, disculpa brevetat, et passo ref:cadastre -> ref:ES:catastro si és una altra referència m'ho dius si us plau, salutacions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Lista_de_referencias_nacionales commented 2025-08-22 10:39:27 UTC by aTarom ♦783 |
| 170768417 (Comments: 1) | Drs246 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zdravím, do OSM sa väčšinou dávajú obmedzenia, ktoré budú trvať pol roka a viac, aby si ich stihli prebrať jednotlivé aplikácie. Takto sa môže stať, že si túto tý... commented 2025-08-22 10:35:34 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170819417 (Comments: 1) | Pesh Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Wrong business, no address -> SPAM. Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170823446 commented 2025-08-22 10:34:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170819092 (Comments: 1) | Pesh Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Wrong business, no address -> SPAM. Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170823345 commented 2025-08-22 10:32:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170823137 (Comments: 1) | Songül Yılmaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Songül Yılmaz Make Up ve Beauty Studio burada hizmet vermektedir. commented 2025-08-22 10:27:05 UTC by Wunjo Aydınlatma ♦6 |
| 169938169 (Comments: 2) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, thanks for the message! I reopened the paths. commented 2025-08-22 10:26:29 UTC by wildmaps ♦48 |
| 170744031 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 102) | The complete absence of blue signs. It is illegal to cycle on pavements in the UK - so the onus is very much on those who claim that cycling is allowed to provide evidence. You cannot simply assume that cycling is allowed because it intersects... commented 2025-08-22 10:13:41 UTC by Pete Owens ♦59 |
| 8279267 (Comments: 1) | martin0reg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Café ist leider schon seit Jahren geschlossen commented 2025-08-22 10:05:48 UTC by Tom-64 ♦1 |
| 170820856 (Comments: 2) | max_berg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Maar als je er gewoon kunt parkeren na betalen is het uiteraard niet access=private commented 2025-08-22 09:57:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170821204 (Comments: 1) | tomciokr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-22 09:51:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170713614 (Comments: 1) | Pascal1909 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi Pascal, kann man eigentlich beim Kreisverkehr von der nördlichen Gehsteigseite über die Gerhard-Kindlerstraße auf die südliche? Falls das geht, würde es das Fußgängerrouting verbessern, wenn man dort noch Gehwe... commented 2025-08-22 09:50:55 UTC by Metzor ♦380 |
| 170768572 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 102) | UK traffic law. It is illegal to cycle on pavement unless explicitly signed as shared use. (these are the blue circular signs with a white cycle and pedestrian) There are no such signs on this pavement. Nor is there any sign of it having been p... commented 2025-08-22 09:48:15 UTC by Pete Owens ♦59 |
| 170818289 (Comments: 4) | MMNTL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het zal strak na updates wel routeren voor wandelaar, want je hebt foot=yes toegevoegd. Wellicht beter foot=permissive van maken. access=no routeert uiteraard niet. Maaarrrrrrrr... Het noordelijke hek zit alleen vast op de afrastering. Er ... commented 2025-08-22 09:47:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170603497 (Comments: 3) | pmichaelis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ah, verstehe. Von den gpx-Tracks her passt DOP20 (und Mapbox) eigentlich immer ganz gut. Leider gibt es in Metzingen keinen ordentlichen Vermesspunkt. In Reutlingen passt es aber ziemlich gut: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5791582325 (Dort... commented 2025-08-22 09:43:05 UTC by Metzor ♦380 |
| 170820220 (Comments: 2) | max_berg (Discussed changesets: 3) | De BAG import uit 2024 heb ik teuggezet. Die kun je evt als building:part= aanpassen. Dan rendert het niet, maar gaan de BAGdata niet verloren. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 09:41:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170820483 (Comments: 1) | tomciokr (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-22 09:41:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170820107 (Comments: 1) | tomciokr (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-22 09:41:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170820004 (Comments: 1) | tomciokr (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-22 09:40:56 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170806546 (Comments: 1) | arnalielsewhere (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. When mapping waterways, please start at the source direction to the collector (river, lake, other stream) So the flow direction is correct. To change the flow direction: In Ideditor: right click on ... commented 2025-08-22 09:40:02 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170817382 (Comments: 1) | Janki Multidots (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Janki, I reverted this changeset as adding a relation to the street for a sales office is an incorrect method. Instead, you should add a new point or node at the sales office building or draw the outline of that building and add your tags to that.... commented 2025-08-22 09:29:50 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170820088 (Comments: 1) | Qrror (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nuorodą i Kultūros vertybių registrų svetainę: https://kvr.kpd.lt/#/static-heritage-detail/287bc15a-afc8-470f-8685-eff418b8c2ea/true commented 2025-08-22 09:27:46 UTC by Qrror ♦1 |
| 165001452 (Comments: 1) | Bálint (Discussed changesets: 49) | A demolished:railway címke együtt nincs használva. A disused:railway=rail és railway=abandoned egymásnak ellentmondásos. commented 2025-08-22 09:27:43 UTC by balint36 ♦209 |
| 170524542 (Comments: 2) | Xre90 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Moin, danke für den konstruktiven Kommentar, das Tool kannte ich noch nicht, ich bin dabei die Wege auszuessern. Beste Grüße commented 2025-08-22 09:17:23 UTC by Xre90 ♦11 |
| 168375818 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This edit was me readding a relation, more specificly a Heidelberg - Flinders Street relation. commented 2025-08-22 09:09:55 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦22 |
| 168375964 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This edit was when I removed the remaining incorrect relations. commented 2025-08-22 09:08:47 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦22 |
| 170682320 (Comments: 6) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 97) | Bom dia, Não é só em Portugal, mas sim em todo o lado. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route commented 2025-08-22 09:07:55 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦95 |
| 170817590 (Comments: 2) | ElizaGoGoes!! (Discussed changesets: 1) | Escape Room Egmond staat al op locatie op de kaart. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 09:07:08 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 168375908 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Fixing relations. commented 2025-08-22 09:07:08 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦22 |
| 170753588 (Comments: 3) | Milroy1812 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Following the comment from 25or6to4, I, buy_osmand, hereby fulfills the initial intention. Thank you Milroy1812, good mapper of the state of Texas, for your current and future works. 😳👍 Good, --- #RE... commented 2025-08-22 09:02:01 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 165618748 (Comments: 2) | Mike Gasteiger (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170818604 commented 2025-08-22 09:00:29 UTC by fs_LT ♦100 |
| 170680834 (Comments: 1) | bracl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you check the Wiki for the proper names of these bicycle charging sockets? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:* commented 2025-08-22 08:59:27 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 170481238 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 102) | Making corrections is one thing, but simply deleting another mappers tags within a few hours of those changes based on what appears to be a thinly disguised personal animosity is vandalism. Yes, of course I am aware that the speed limit was 2... commented 2025-08-22 08:59:21 UTC by Pete Owens ♦59 |
| 167522495 (Comments: 3) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi, I have receved no further feedback across any other worldwide changesets related to this project. It will be resumed. Please direct any further feedback to the fourm page,https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-partially-automated-edit-... commented 2025-08-22 08:49:16 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦36 |
| 170816367 (Comments: 1) | Cicuta33 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Cicuta.. Het is nu wel dubbel, want het adres staat al op het terrein. Geen probleem overigens. Ik heb de spatie uit de postcode gehaald. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 08:31:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170487720 (Comments: 1) | chippyyyyy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Thanks for mapping. Afte correcting the offset (lined the streets to their footprints) Many higher places are not correct placed on their footprints. Check this footage (examples are bigger, but in fact the same) how highrise build... commented 2025-08-22 08:31:25 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 154820433 (Comments: 3) | sudface (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ok , I'll change it back.. commented 2025-08-22 08:30:54 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,670 |
| 170813657 (Comments: 1) | nanzop (Discussed changesets: 31) | jak zwykle robi błędy i nie naprawia po sobie commented 2025-08-22 08:30:45 UTC by Yog Sot ♦267 |
| 170378371 (Comments: 4) | unique_identifier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hab die nodes nach dem neuen Schema getagged (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170817134) und meine presets geändert commented 2025-08-22 08:30:11 UTC by unique_identifier ♦4 |
| 170816170 (Comments: 1) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Are you sure it's still under construction, when a note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2327347) says it started almost 5 years ago? Aerial imagery doesn't seem to show construction, though it's not very clear. commented 2025-08-22 08:25:23 UTC by kingkingHK ♦6 |
| 170767065 (Comments: 2) | EryrEryri (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you Phil. That is very useful. commented 2025-08-22 08:20:13 UTC by EryrEryri ♦2 |
| 170801887 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Check this webpage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423988086/history#map=19/31.740194/130.709591 You mapped 1 large building with 2 small ones on the left side. These 2 mappings are the sidewall of the same building. Not to be m... commented 2025-08-22 08:16:28 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 169006094 (Comments: 4) | Anne Wittrick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Ivan, I have moved the monumental plaque to the correct side of the road. Thanks for you help. commented 2025-08-22 08:13:35 UTC by Anne Wittrick ♦1 |
| 169381481 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 44) | Grazie per la spiegazione e per aver ripristinato! commented 2025-08-22 08:09:07 UTC by f_gonella ♦31 |
| 170488091 (Comments: 3) | Vincent @ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Les relations qui matérialisent les itinéraires dans OSM sont composées d'une liste ordonnée de ways. Lorsqu'on fait des modifications, les éditeurs ont tendance à mettre les ways en désordre... commented 2025-08-22 08:01:03 UTC by StC ♦310 |
| 170801132 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You mapped here, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423983724/history#map=19/31.743243/130.695452 7 buildings, despite it is 1 building with 2 roof parts, and a round storage tanks The lowest objects are car pa... commented 2025-08-22 07:55:42 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170764876 (Comments: 1) | ujinevich (Discussed changesets: 31) | I, buy_osmand, do hereby invite Milroy1812, publicly identified to be actively mapping the state of Texas, to exact judgement on this edit. Milroy1812, good mapper, what is the judgement of this edit please? 😳⁉ --- ... commented 2025-08-22 07:53:21 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170798809 (Comments: 1) | PLiwer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, witaj w OSM! Fajnie, że dodałeś zidentyfikowany - najpewniej naocznie - CPR. Jako, że zauważyłem tę zmianę, postanowiłem dać kilka uwag: 1. Dodawaj źródło zmian - na ten przykład mogła by to być "wizjalokalna&quo... commented 2025-08-22 07:46:52 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦202 |
| 170793645 (Comments: 1) | wjfarnell (Discussed changesets: 1) | I, buy_osmand, do hereby verify that way/1423944430 that has been created by wjfarnell's hands ✍ is indeed `landuse=grass` 😳👍 Good, --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-08-22 07:45:16 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
 | 170804594 (Comments: 1) | R2bal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fiction removed. commented 2025-08-22 07:43:36 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,896 |
| 170803363 (Comments: 1) | MigRol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, MigRol. Gracias por los cambios. He hecho algunas pequeñas correcciones, nada importante. En cuanto a la etiqueta a utilizar para una tienda de sonido profesional, dado que no vende instrumentos musicales sino equipo... commented 2025-08-22 07:39:40 UTC by dcapillae ♦372 |
| 169005718 (Comments: 1) | Juliet225 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure=pitch commented 2025-08-22 07:30:25 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦13 |
| 170763690 (Comments: 2) | Paul van der Heijden (Discussed changesets: 8) | Paul Ik heb het aangepast naar bollard=rising Kan regulier verkeer hier wel uit? Aan de kant van de Wilhelminastraat staat een C1 bord. Op wegdeel motor_vehicle:backward=no toegevoegd + moped en mofa yes traffic_sign=NL:C1 ... commented 2025-08-22 07:29:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170766337 (Comments: 2) | Mortisian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Jepp, Habe das jetzt geändert. Erlaubter Zugang ist nun Öffentlich und die Öffnungszeiten sind nun "zu den Schulzeiten". Danke für dein Feedback. :) --- Published using OSMCh... commented 2025-08-22 07:23:33 UTC by Mortisian ♦2 |
| 170810764 (Comments: 2) | Karttakeisari (Discussed changesets: 2) | No pitää tosiaan. Heittelin vanhat ensin roskikseen, jotta sain tehtyä tiet kuntoon, mutta unohdin tietysti tehdä tämän uusiksi. Korjasin. commented 2025-08-22 07:21:34 UTC by Karttakeisari ♦2 |
| 170813248 (Comments: 1) | Déverine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci pour cette modification, je me suis permis de corriger deux choses : - j'ai enlevé le numéro du bâtiment vu qu'il est maintenant sous forme de point, un numéro ne doit être présent q... commented 2025-08-22 07:17:57 UTC by Syl ♦980 |
| 140975394 (Comments: 2) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 33) | 21 sept gaat de Pannehoef weer officieel open. Volgens mij zijn er nu al clubjes die terug gekomen zijn. Ik hou dat in de gaten. Bedankt voor de informatie, ik hou dat in de gaten. commented 2025-08-22 07:06:40 UTC by fietswim ♦4 |
| 170082003 (Comments: 3) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Extreme park si moze pisat, co sa mu zachce, ale nie je to oficialny zdroj. Je mozne pouzit tieto zdroje: - realne v terene najst cedulku s nazvom ulice, byva pripevnena na dome/plote na zaciatku a konci ulice, - oficialny zoznam ulic mesta ... commented 2025-08-22 07:02:12 UTC by t_ja ♦209 |
| 134381429 (Comments: 1) | EstherH (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo EstherH, Ik zie dat je hier een poging gedaan hebt om een bussluis toe te voegen. een stukje verder is deze bussluis gemapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/301724182 Zijn hier twee bussluizen of is dit mogelijk een... commented 2025-08-22 06:53:40 UTC by Tjuro ♦229 |
| 170779265 (Comments: 2) | Sir_Veyor (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ich habe es nachbearbeitet. Ich hatte zunächst nur die Geometrie aufgrund meiner GNSS-Messungen verbessert und musst heute früh nochmal genau nachschauen, welcher Weg für wen freigegeben ist commented 2025-08-22 06:51:24 UTC by Sir_Veyor ♦4 |
| 170811798 (Comments: 1) | MKB5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag MK , 'Some little things' zegt niemand iets. Graag concreet commentaar toevoegen bij de je uploads. Belona BV staat al op de kaart. De dubbele vermelding heb ik verwijderd. Alleen een naam doet trouwens niets in OSM. hors... commented 2025-08-22 06:36:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 168486911 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 399) | Merci de votre alerte Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-08-22 06:35:23 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦241 |
| 170797607 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel 19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170812160 commented 2025-08-22 06:33:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170729518 (Comments: 4) | Kraichgauner (Discussed changesets: 5) | Rückbau: habe die Änderungen zurückgenommen. Danke für die Hinweise. commented 2025-08-22 06:31:51 UTC by Kraichgauner ♦3 |
| 170810328 (Comments: 1) | Fedde89 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fedde... en dat zou dan ook Eindhoven Gerarduskerk header Eindhoven Gerarduskerk Sint Gerardusplein 25 5644NG Eindhoven moeten zijn en niet Sint Gerarduslaan. Ik heb een herïmportverzoek lopen op het forum. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-22 06:29:47 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170556631 (Comments: 2) | Ngô Đình Hoàng (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nhờ bạn kiểm tra tính đúng đắn, đầy đủ các thành phần của biển báo: from, via, to nhé. commented 2025-08-22 06:29:45 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170809874 (Comments: 1) | Fedde89 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Fedde, Even een vraag neergelegd bij de BAG importeurs over die adresnodes hier. Dat zou inderdaad Sint Gerardusplein moeten zijn, maar de adresnodes geven allemaal Sint Gerarduslaan aan in OSM. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ba... commented 2025-08-22 06:25:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170793142 (Comments: 1) | Randy 28502 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! Please don't any standard name ("House") to the objekts. commented 2025-08-22 06:25:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170809453 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_Ngaan (Discussed changesets: 14) | 19340229 biển báo này cũng mất thành phần, nhờ bạn kiểm tra lại. Cám ơn bạn. commented 2025-08-22 06:24:23 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170768590 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_Ngaan (Discussed changesets: 14) | relation 17408302 bị mất thành phần. Có gì bạn kiểm tra lại nhé. Cám ơn bạn. commented 2025-08-22 06:23:16 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 36351492 (Comments: 2) | 随风-125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您的很多交通转向限制疑似有误，如果您仍然不回复我，我会帮您删除掉 commented 2025-08-22 06:21:35 UTC by hahae ♦7 |
| 170793672 (Comments: 1) | emilybemily (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3835204410 (address) more than 100 meters. Please check this! commented 2025-08-22 06:21:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
 | 170799109 (Comments: 1) | Infinite Order (Discussed changesets: 4) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-22 05:55:41 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170798869 (Comments: 1) | Infinite Order (Discussed changesets: 4) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-22 05:55:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 167784247 (Comments: 4) | stadt-koeln-umac (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo zusammen, in anderen Städten sind die tags area=yes und highway=footway seeehr oft vorhanden. Ich würde hier auch keine Fußgängerzone draus machen, wenn diese in der Örtlichkeit nicht explizit beschildert ist. commented 2025-08-22 05:26:38 UTC by Rjian42195 ♦3 |
| 170784150 (Comments: 4) | Tijnvdh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nog even gekeken.. In deze changeset heb je het het bedrijf toegevoegd. Dat aanpassen heb je later gedaan. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170782317 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170782317 Daar had je het bes... commented 2025-08-22 05:21:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169893413 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 862) | @mueschel laut https://tldr.nettime.org/@leitmedium/115068427255737564 hängen jetzt die Schilder. Wir könnten also die Namen jetzt umdrehen. commented 2025-08-22 04:57:40 UTC by tordans ♦417 |
| 170701237 (Comments: 1) | UDA CARO JR (Discussed changesets: 3) | The footprint I flagged enveloes multiple buildigns. Each footprint should represent one building. Use shadows, colours and plots to discriminate between adjacent buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for... commented 2025-08-22 04:19:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170701251 (Comments: 1) | UDA CARO JR (Discussed changesets: 3) | These appear to only be walls. Look at the shadow cast by the feature on the East. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback f... commented 2025-08-22 04:16:09 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170702895 (Comments: 1) | UDA CARO JR (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in imagery but the footprints you mapped could be more accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like dat... commented 2025-08-22 04:13:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170808048 (Comments: 1) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 70) | review request was an accident commented 2025-08-22 04:02:11 UTC by cubbe8 ♦61 |
| 170744217 (Comments: 1) | Katia Melissa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Did you intend to tag this as a house, or was it a mistake? Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here ht... commented 2025-08-22 03:48:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170744384 (Comments: 1) | Katia Melissa (Discussed changesets: 4) | A valid highway that looks accuraetly tagged. The line should follow the centre of the highway, a few more nodes could have been added on the corners to make it more accurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM communi... commented 2025-08-22 03:46:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170744076 (Comments: 1) | Katia Melissa (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think the waestern footprint envelopes two buildings. Each footprint should represent one building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to ge... commented 2025-08-22 03:41:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170744013 (Comments: 2) | Katia Melissa (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think that the southern most footprint is mapped as well as the imagery allows. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170744013 commented 2025-08-22 03:40:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 169304828 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 199) | Fixed tag typo from "refd=" to "ref=" https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170807623 commented 2025-08-22 03:22:49 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,052 |
| 170791536 (Comments: 3) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola, sí. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791536 commented 2025-08-22 03:20:34 UTC by James2813 ♦10 |
| 170762731 (Comments: 3) | Jayden123142 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I expect the housenumber should be a number in the 400’s commented 2025-08-22 02:53:59 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
 | 170260924 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 106) | I, buy_osmand, stand to verify that this is acted to the request of anonymous as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4900580 😳 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2025-08-22 02:21:14 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170806019 (Comments: 1) | pjodhka90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, 20 and 22 Falconer Street building should be drawn as two separate houses commented 2025-08-22 01:43:06 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170752372 (Comments: 1) | Mau_Ns (Discussed changesets: 3) | Some of the footpritns you mapped here are quite accurate, but oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that ... commented 2025-08-22 01:33:54 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170752133 (Comments: 1) | Mau_Ns (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in imagery, but many of the footpritns you mapped here envelope either multiple buildings or entire plots. Each footprint should represent one building. Use shadows and colours and plots to discriminate b... commented 2025-08-22 01:31:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 89137527 (Comments: 2) | F5ZV (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bsr, Tous les cas que tu cites sont des "gués" Non pas des fossés mais des ruisseaux. Courts parce que leurs prolongements ne sont pas visibles de la piste ou du chemin traversés. Ils se raccordent sans doute &... commented 2025-08-22 00:23:26 UTC by F5ZV ♦8 |
| 169756746 (Comments: 3) | Raymond (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hallo stadt-koeln-umac, mal davon abgesehen, dass es nicht die eine Karte gibt, sondern viele verschiedene Karten, die auf OSM-Daten basieren: Mit dem loc_name hat das überhaupt nichts zu tun. Wie auch schon von Raymond vermutet, dürfte es ... commented 2025-08-22 00:11:08 UTC by timmito ♦173 |
| 170791254 (Comments: 1) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Quizás sea redundante nombrar el farmyard y agregar, además, el fundo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791254 commented 2025-08-22 00:08:14 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170798387 (Comments: 1) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola. Le pusiste forest a una casa con árboles. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170798387 commented 2025-08-22 00:04:10 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170772080 (Comments: 1) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 37) | po co? commented 2025-08-21 23:14:03 UTC by puchaczowsky ♦141 |
| 170787935 (Comments: 1) | MihaelIvanjek (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks for spotting that - I should have noticed and fixed it when I updated the bridge signs and restrictions. commented 2025-08-21 23:00:18 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 166545411 (Comments: 2) | Tech Dec (Discussed changesets: 45) | Thanks Mateusz. Not sure how or why I added that, when there was an existing wikidata tag (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5445742) on it already. commented 2025-08-21 22:58:32 UTC by Tech Dec ♦42 |
| 170785724 (Comments: 2) | SikeMo (Discussed changesets: 8) | No problem. Hopefully, I'll finish the rest in the next few days. Look forward to taking my family down there to ride. commented 2025-08-21 22:51:36 UTC by SikeMo ♦7 |
| 169341882 (Comments: 3) | WDC_CKennett (Discussed changesets: 1) | You could have read the documentation from links within the iD editor which you used, to understand the meaning of a tag before deleting or changing it. If you really didn't know what the effect of deleting the highway tag would be, you shouldn&... commented 2025-08-21 22:43:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170062552 (Comments: 3) | Joxit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yes or at least a lot smaller changeset size. Otherwise, if we look at OSM history or use OSMCha to revise edits, your changeset is listed for all the areas in the BBOX. commented 2025-08-21 22:34:22 UTC by PierZen ♦271 |
| 170746893 (Comments: 2) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 111) | Myślałem, że oznaczenie to jako „nieoznakowane" rozwiąże sprawę. commented 2025-08-21 22:32:35 UTC by Adam Haba ♦21 |
| 170746030 (Comments: 1) | sSmits (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag sSmits, highway=cycleway leidt tot een foutmelding. Bovendien ontbreekt het daarvoor benodigde verkeersbord. Ik zet de way terug naar residential, met de juiste access tags. commented 2025-08-21 22:24:02 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,386 |
| 44531497 (Comments: 1) | schadow1 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello schadow1, I noticed you added this ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460668263) that travels between two small islands, but does not have any ferry terminals. The OSM wiki page for ferries states that "Ferries are a for... commented 2025-08-21 22:23:38 UTC by maps_not_naps ♦4 |
| 170762936 (Comments: 1) | cut19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Since the flock device is usually mounted on a pole, it shouldn't be added to a landuse or sidewalk way. Can you fix these? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170762936 ... commented 2025-08-21 22:19:41 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170801657 (Comments: 1) | clay_c (Discussed changesets: 110) | Bravo, sir! commented 2025-08-21 22:18:46 UTC by stevea ♦309 |
| 170757372 (Comments: 1) | megcheu (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't think that this fits the wiki definition of an informal crossings. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=informal. If you agree, can you correct it? --- Published using OSMCha:... commented 2025-08-21 22:15:50 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170796028 (Comments: 1) | bieszczad (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-08-21 22:14:53 UTC by bartgron ♦217 |
| 170759055 (Comments: 1) | Amartya453 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. This is a unuseful... commented 2025-08-21 22:11:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170757998 (Comments: 1) | Amartya453 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you remove the tags amenity=cafe and cuisine=coffee_shop? You were correct when you first added them. Can you add them back? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170757998 ... commented 2025-08-21 22:10:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170658728 (Comments: 2) | StVeit_Maps (Discussed changesets: 39) | Ok lass es mich erklären: die Grafik auf der Website sollte nur eine beispielhafte darstellung sein und kein plan. Ich komme aus der Gegend und kann dir versichern dass das was du eingetragen hast keinen sinn hat. Un der node ist sinnlos da ja s... commented 2025-08-21 22:00:32 UTC by StVeit_Maps ♦14 |
| 170745623 (Comments: 2) | Felix borges (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170745623 commented 2025-08-21 21:59:40 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170746039 (Comments: 1) | Felix borges (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170746039 commented 2025-08-21 21:59:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170747214 (Comments: 1) | Felix borges (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170747214 commented 2025-08-21 21:59:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170743505 (Comments: 1) | Jaz1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: We don't use descriptive names, just tag it properly has you have is sufficient. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170743505 commented 2025-08-21 21:55:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170779664 (Comments: 4) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 153) | Thanks for writing back. About your other questions now. All the objects you added today are still in the database, so they will be available for searches. There are 3 reasons why you won’t see them immediately on the map. (Th... commented 2025-08-21 21:54:51 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,527 |
| 161011290 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 65) | Trying to fix tigerking fixme issues, what does [object object] mean? commented 2025-08-21 21:41:27 UTC by CoryS89 ♦2 |
| 170801467 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 205) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4922015 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:38\tclosed\tok 4922022 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:38\tclosed\tok 4922029 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:38\tclosed\tok 4922010 (iD)\tfel... commented 2025-08-21 21:39:27 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 61105911 (Comments: 1) | cowdog (Discussed changesets: 13) | Great work! This was super helpful!! commented 2025-08-21 21:37:42 UTC by watmildon ♦252 |
| 169505216 (Comments: 2) | benfatih (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your comment. Second time, i will pay more attention to fill the address and use english color names. commented 2025-08-21 21:28:14 UTC by benfatih ♦1 |
| 170800871 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 205) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4922034 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:17\tclosed\tok.. 4922041 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:17\tclosed\tok.. 4922035 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:17\tclosed\tok.. 4922036 (iD... commented 2025-08-21 21:27:35 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170800709 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 205) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4922007 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:11\tclosed\tok. 4921994 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:11\treopened\tok. 4922001 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:11\tclosed\tok. 4922002 ... commented 2025-08-21 21:27:08 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170797028 (Comments: 2) | easytarget-OSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke; dank U, goed om to weten Mvg, Owen commented 2025-08-21 21:16:01 UTC by easytarget-OSM ♦2 |
| 155826754 (Comments: 1) | Mariusz 2M (Discussed changesets: 44) | coś się zmieniło ws tej drogi? commented 2025-08-21 21:12:30 UTC by theDM ♦119 |
| 170799855 (Comments: 1) | antamauna (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-21 21:11:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170799903 (Comments: 2) | antamauna (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-21 21:11:06 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 169791889 (Comments: 5) | Ygramul (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hm, Mapillary ist allerdings auch schon 6 Jahre alt ... ich weiß noch, daß die Note sich eigentlich um die 16 t drehte, die aber schon eingetragen waren, ich da aber noch ein weiteres Schild sah und stattdessen das zusätzlich eingetr... commented 2025-08-21 21:02:18 UTC by Ygramul ♦81 |
| 170662263 (Comments: 3) | Shre_WD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Great---thank you for your response! commented 2025-08-21 21:00:15 UTC by Romwriter ♦198 |
| 150311894 (Comments: 3) | Bogomil Shopov - Бого (Discussed changesets: 4) | Аз съм ползвал landuse=industrial + industrial=scrap_yard за Надин, които се занимават със същата дейност. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:industrial%3Dscrap_yard commented 2025-08-21 20:51:38 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦684 |
| 163503213 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-21 20:46:55 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 169301172 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 44) | In realtà, la segnaletica proveniente da sud indica la SS16 per la direzione Ancona e la variante solo per il centro di SBT. Sinceramente sono combattuto se in questo caso si debba seguire il principio che la variante declassa la strada preced... commented 2025-08-21 20:46:35 UTC by f_gonella ♦31 |
 | 170494999 (Comments: 2) | vslatten (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ja, det var ein godt synleg sti då vi var der forrige veke. commented 2025-08-21 20:42:03 UTC by vslatten ♦2 |
| 162060354 (Comments: 1) | DirkHH69 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin, du hast hier ja dutzende archäologische Grabstätten eingetragen, teilweise sogar mit Kommentar "muss noch verifiziert werden". Wo hast du die Daten her? Für mich sieht das so aus, dass du die Daten nicht vor Ort ... commented 2025-08-21 20:34:45 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦319 |
| 170642783 (Comments: 2) | CartoGlobe (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Merci pour le conseil Bonne journée commented 2025-08-21 20:27:47 UTC by CartoGlobe ♦1 |
| 170798732 (Comments: 1) | Dawid Ja (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-21 20:20:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170797865 (Comments: 1) | easytarget-OSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wanneer iets aanwezig is als een meerpaal kan het gewoon op de kaart. OSM heeft ook een waterkaart. Daar staat zelfs de hele betonning in. https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=12.8&lon=5.02321&lat=52.32809&layers=TFTFFFTFFTFFFFFFFFFFFF<... commented 2025-08-21 20:20:50 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170773225 (Comments: 1) | d1rtyd1sater (Discussed changesets: 4) | этот тег лишний, это значение по умолчанию. подробнее у меня в профиле commented 2025-08-21 20:20:25 UTC by literan ♦6,755 |
| 170290901 (Comments: 4) | PDMMDP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again. This is a great idea and I would be happy to help! I cannot walk very far just now but hopefully this is just a temporary situation! I will very much be keeping this in mind though. Thank you! commented 2025-08-21 20:20:20 UTC by PDMMDP ♦1 |
| 169656191 (Comments: 6) | GermanTaxi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gern geschehen. Ih habe alle Deine Einträge entsprechend angepasst,: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170798628 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170798293 commented 2025-08-21 20:16:25 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 170797010 (Comments: 1) | GerLogan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je bijdrage lijkt me oke.. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-21 20:09:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 163359174 (Comments: 7) | YuiChan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ja, hatte ich gerade gesehen :) Danke für den Kommentar, sonst hätte ich das wahrscheinlich nie gefunden :D commented 2025-08-21 20:01:22 UTC by YuiChan ♦1 |
| 170784766 (Comments: 3) | max_berg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Okay Top! 👍 commented 2025-08-21 19:59:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170796987 (Comments: 1) | grzegorz75jan (Discussed changesets: 19) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13087500724 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-08-21 19:51:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170740379 (Comments: 3) | BeJotEl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gar kein Problem! Ich hab es wieder ergänzt :) Gab's einen Kräuterschnaps aufs Haus? commented 2025-08-21 19:49:11 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 166342585 (Comments: 1) | I7564 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zdravim, pristup autom sa znaci motorcar=nieco . Ale myslim, ze uz to mate dobre, motorove vozidla ste dali nie, a dalsi pouzivatel Vam pomohol a dal motorcycle=yes, takze motorky uz mozu. A aka "mapa nenaviguje"? V akom programe to ... commented 2025-08-21 19:44:01 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170777124 (Comments: 3) | Der Troisdorfer (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hallo Der Troisdorfer, wieso benötigen Garagen kein "building:levels", nur weil sie in der Regel immer nur 1 Etage haben ? "building:levels" ist bei Gebäuden nie verkehrt und sollte daher auch nicht gelöscht werd... commented 2025-08-21 19:43:45 UTC by Zrop ♦77 |
| 170683162 (Comments: 2) | DaDapperMapper (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi Muralito, After reviewing the data again, I can see how these are not significant roads and may not be useful additions. I have removed the roads, and will avoid adding private driveways in the future. Thanks! commented 2025-08-21 19:41:54 UTC by DaDapperMapper ♦15 |
| 170482879 (Comments: 4) | Der Troisdorfer (Discussed changesets: 41) | Danke. Ich habe noch ein paar in anderen Änderungssätzen von Dir gefunden, wäre schön wenn Du Dir die auch nochmal anschaust, siehe https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ajh Danke. Gruß Zrop commented 2025-08-21 19:41:25 UTC by Zrop ♦77 |
| 159479019 (Comments: 1) | hwierzbicki (Discussed changesets: 19) | You connected a dirt road to a highway and didn't set any access restriction so routers are sending traffic along it to get on and off the highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336975369/history commented 2025-08-21 19:38:47 UTC by blackboxlogic ♦459 |
| 170766441 (Comments: 1) | JennyLIUU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and thanks for improving OSM! Just a small thing for the next time. No need to create a separate building for restaurant. You can just create a point and label it as restaurant. commented 2025-08-21 19:36:17 UTC by Mashin ♦566 |
| 167551374 (Comments: 3) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 27) | Gracias por contestar. Eliminadas. Un saludo. commented 2025-08-21 19:36:11 UTC by MarinoBM ♦99 |
 | 170797015 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Pertsev (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D1%8F%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B8_(%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%91%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C) commented 2025-08-21 19:24:00 UTC by Andrew Pertsev ♦1 |
| 170781584 (Comments: 1) | SimonBuchberger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, am Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13086976847 Die Farbe wird immer englisch angegeben, also „red“ statt „rot“. Unklare Daten werden nicht mit „?“ o. ä. angegeben, sondern im Zweife... commented 2025-08-21 19:16:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170777235 (Comments: 1) | SimonBuchberger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, ich habe eine Anmerkung zu deinen Anpassungen. Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das l&o... commented 2025-08-21 19:12:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170779100 (Comments: 5) | easytarget-OSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke... veel plezier met mappen! Gr eggie commented 2025-08-21 19:07:14 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170796271 (Comments: 1) | Rp19 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Also removed the closed Bank of Scotland commented 2025-08-21 19:05:55 UTC by Rp19 ♦7 |
| 170565102 (Comments: 2) | jodd (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hallo! Da ist bei meinem Entfernen der Lifecycle-Präfixe ja ein bisschen was durcheinander geraten. Ist korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2025-08-21 19:04:46 UTC by jodd ♦121 |
| 170791185 (Comments: 3) | TommyEnglish (Discussed changesets: 3) | It duplicate some of my add commented 2025-08-21 18:56:31 UTC by TommyEnglish ♦2 |
| 170780534 (Comments: 1) | JDammer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das sieht gut aus – keine Anmerkungen. Bei Fragen bitte melden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-21 18:49:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170757284 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ein anderer Mapper hat deine Anpassungen bereits überarbeitet, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170760814 Bei Fragen bitte melden. Viele Grü&... commented 2025-08-21 18:48:26 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170795565 (Comments: 1) | Martin Ortuta (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, vďaka za upozornenie. Budem si na to dávať pozor. commented 2025-08-21 18:46:07 UTC by Martin Ortuta ♦1 |
| 79159271 (Comments: 1) | 55131er (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, was meintest du denn mit 64A68 ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240710478 Beide Hausnummern am gleichen Gebäude ? Dann sollten das zwei Knoten sein für die beiden Adressen Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-21 18:45:50 UTC by limes11 ♦913 |
| 170659597 (Comments: 2) | rimeraz (Discussed changesets: 7) | angepasst mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170795439 commented 2025-08-21 18:44:18 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170795076 (Comments: 1) | NittyGrittyInTheCity (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: the source used was MGP Pro 2025.07.23 commented 2025-08-21 18:35:48 UTC by NittyGrittyInTheCity ♦13 |
| 170676426 (Comments: 2) | Saranya Prasad (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for valuable feedback. We referred to OSM Bing Streetside imagery from 2022, and based on that, we assigned the lowered curb. commented 2025-08-21 18:33:36 UTC by Saranya Prasad ♦1 |
| 170775385 (Comments: 1) | CRIOSITY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aydınlıkevler mahallesi 2023 ADNK verisine göre bile 24,755 nüfusa sahip. Değişikliğin bir kısmını geri alıyorum. Lütfen etiketlemelere dikkat edin. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170794957 commented 2025-08-21 18:32:23 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170761424 (Comments: 1) | seopinnacleagency (Discussed changesets: 10) | I deleted the address (it's already on the building), the opening hours (incorrect format) and the description (spam). Please, please learn from your mistakes, so I don't have to waste my time as a volunteer correcting the garbage you�... commented 2025-08-21 18:31:03 UTC by rhhs ♦136 |
| 170725372 (Comments: 2) | KorraSato (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, Danke schön für den Rat. Ich habe geglaubt, dass man wörtlich wie auf den Stolpersteinen schreiben muss (immer Majuskeln). Herzlich. commented 2025-08-21 18:29:48 UTC by KorraSato ♦7 |
| 170753055 (Comments: 1) | RiyaNandy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! The key building=school only means that the building looks like a school. If you want to indicate a theatre school, for example, you should add the tag amenity=theatre_school. For details, please refer to the wiki at https://w... commented 2025-08-21 18:11:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 167152758 (Comments: 1) | Thibault M (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Je vais devoir annuler tes changements car tu as fait une double erreur: supprimer un tag important (emergency=moutain_rescue) pour la description de la structure pour le remplacer par un tag inapproprié (amenity=police). Je te... commented 2025-08-21 18:09:48 UTC by gendy54 ♦595 |
| 170691228 (Comments: 1) | valbzh22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je pense que c'est ce tag: fuel:cng=yes Il est utilisé pour le gaz naturel compressé (GNC) comme pour les gaz naturels pour véhicules (GNV) qui inclut le GNC et le gaz naturel liquéfié (GN... commented 2025-08-21 18:06:46 UTC by KorraSato ♦7 |
| 170792118 (Comments: 1) | sshaffer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1098387519. You changed the value of natural from forest to grass. Were all the trees that can still be seen on the aerial photographs felled? commented 2025-08-21 17:41:14 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170781905 (Comments: 1) | Der Troisdorfer (Discussed changesets: 41) | Test commented 2025-08-21 17:37:20 UTC by berndw ♦604 |
| 169278171 (Comments: 11) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 453) | Tylko z tymi szybami to też nie dodajemy całego terenu kopalni. Tylko jeden punkt w miejscu gdzie był szyb z odpowiednimi tagami. commented 2025-08-21 17:34:43 UTC by olo81 ♦685 |
| 170792108 (Comments: 1) | Donaldson Weston Lake Mary (Discussed changesets: 2) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-21 17:26:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 165354736 (Comments: 1) | Donaldson Weston Lake Mary (Discussed changesets: 2) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-21 17:26:27 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 158988821 (Comments: 4) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 110) | Indeed, that may be ambiguous. It seems there are still few motor_oils tagged in the world :) Thanks for the hint. commented 2025-08-21 17:23:35 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170789398 (Comments: 1) | Cart1082 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Cart1082, meinst du wirklich das Erfassen von "kein Radweg" oder "kein Gehweg" an Zufahrten hat einen Mehrwert? Grüße und weiterhin frohes mappen. Langläufer --- ... commented 2025-08-21 17:15:54 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,341 |
 | 170516027 (Comments: 2) | Friendly_Ghost (Discussed changesets: 174) | I gave up on that concept. Anyway, we have good review tools like better-osm-org, OSMcha and OSM changeset visualiser, so this shouldn't be much of a problem. I also discussed this already with the broader community on the forum and peop... commented 2025-08-21 17:13:36 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦642 |
| 170783221 (Comments: 2) | Crys64 (Discussed changesets: 5) | ok merci, je contrôlerai les éventuels itinéraires à l'avenir commented 2025-08-21 17:05:21 UTC by Crys64 ♦4 |
| 154757410 (Comments: 3) | Martin868 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Encore plus récemment. https://www.lecharlevoisien.com/2025/06/02/cote-a-godin-la-municipalite-change-de-strategie-pour-relancer-le-dossier/ commented 2025-08-21 17:00:12 UTC by Martin868 ♦64 |
| 157780856 (Comments: 5) | alan1209 (Discussed changesets: 30) | danke für den Update. commented 2025-08-21 16:54:09 UTC by chris66 ♦382 |
| 170771894 (Comments: 1) | Sveti Nikola (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-21 16:53:18 UTC by Comino ♦120 |
| 170758936 (Comments: 1) | hildgyorgy (Discussed changesets: 8) | pitches within a campsite are tourism=camp_pitch, not tourism=caravan_site ! commented 2025-08-21 16:31:41 UTC by hk51 ♦29 |
| 170758914 (Comments: 1) | hildgyorgy (Discussed changesets: 8) | pitches within a campsite are tourism=camp_pitch, not tourism=caravan_site ! commented 2025-08-21 16:31:26 UTC by hk51 ♦29 |
| 170758861 (Comments: 1) | hildgyorgy (Discussed changesets: 8) | pitches within a campsite are tourism=camp_pitch, not tourism=caravan_site ! commented 2025-08-21 16:31:09 UTC by hk51 ♦29 |
| 170766588 (Comments: 6) | Alexander da Costa Amaral (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ja, dann alles mit junction=yes belassen. Danke! commented 2025-08-21 16:21:10 UTC by thopf ♦81 |
| 167434387 (Comments: 2) | Stefan@MUC (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für den Hinweis - ja, tatsächlich scheint der besser geeignet, kannte ich noch gar nicht. Ich hab's mit Changeset #170788920 angepasst. commented 2025-08-21 16:19:32 UTC by Stefan@MUC ♦10 |
| 168559263 (Comments: 3) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | Zgadzam się, że pominięcie autostrady na to zasługuje, jednak ta droga to co najwyżej alternatywa Karmelkowej dla Muchoboru. commented 2025-08-21 16:18:45 UTC by pavvv ♦533 |
| 169520750 (Comments: 4) | RuthlessPedestrian (Discussed changesets: 1) | S'all good. :) Like I wrote above, it gets very tricky downtown. Buildings sometimes have multiple entrances, each with their own address, each with their own postal codes. Some buildings the ground and second floor spaces will have their own po... commented 2025-08-21 16:13:13 UTC by hoserab ♦200 |
| 170770595 (Comments: 2) | antamauna (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-21 16:12:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170779869 (Comments: 3) | kamil76w (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-08-21 16:12:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 169984646 (Comments: 3) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 151) | Hello ratrun, OK thank you for your quick feedback. We will then wait for the other feedback. Best regards, Patchi. commented 2025-08-21 16:00:54 UTC by Patchi ♦132 |
| 165342973 (Comments: 3) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ok, die Schilder stehen noch da, das Tagging ist also korrekt. Es dürfen dort keine Busse durchfahren. Ob sie das trotzdem tun weiß ich leider nicht. commented 2025-08-21 15:52:34 UTC by akino_germany ♦17 |
| 167638797 (Comments: 3) | CjMalone (Discussed changesets: 109) | Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. commented 2025-08-21 15:49:42 UTC by PierZen ♦271 |
| 168896503 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas to help local contributors to review. commented 2025-08-21 15:47:32 UTC by PierZen ♦271 |
| 170754678 (Comments: 3) | Tulatu (Discussed changesets: 1) | highway=construction n'est pas considéré comme routable dans la plupart des engins de calcul. Ce n'est pas mon algorithme, mais bien la plupart des algorithmes, comme OSRM qui est un des plus utilisés. access=no ... commented 2025-08-21 15:47:22 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦382 |
| 170773479 (Comments: 13) | FL0815H (Discussed changesets: 6) | Danke auch und sorry für die Umstände! commented 2025-08-21 15:47:17 UTC by FL0815H ♦2 |
| 170739834 (Comments: 2) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hallo Klaus, danke für den Hinweis, jetzt sehe ich es auch. Ist geändert! Ich bitte um Entschuldigung für den Fehler. Gruß Michael commented 2025-08-21 15:40:57 UTC by MichaelFS ♦58 |
| 170785599 (Comments: 1) | CampariSoda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Did we get a ski chalet or was this an attempt at mapping a house? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170785599 commented 2025-08-21 15:38:46 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,150 |
| X | 170772314 (Comments: 3) | M57 (Discussed changesets: 1) | please, smaller changesets, less continents. commented 2025-08-21 15:35:57 UTC by PierZen ♦271 |
| 170739963 (Comments: 2) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 45) | Danke Klaus, habe es revertiert. Gruß Michael commented 2025-08-21 15:32:30 UTC by MichaelFS ♦58 |
| 170785431 (Comments: 3) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 273) | I try. Mike commented 2025-08-21 15:25:53 UTC by HeiligerHein112 ♦11 |
| 165533055 (Comments: 2) | CK27 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! The tag myosmnote=villageMapping2024 is a wrong tagging in my data. I know that pcode means Myanmar Place Code. Do you know if there is related content about this on the OSM Wiki for Myanmar? commented 2025-08-21 15:24:28 UTC by CK27 ♦1 |
| 139211154 (Comments: 1) | shtm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ist das ein reiner Radweg oder dürfen da auch Fußgänger? Vielleicht kannst Du die Beschilderung ergänzen: Siehe hierzu: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ commented 2025-08-21 15:23:42 UTC by opendcc ♦1,542 |
| 170773360 (Comments: 1) | Michal Sv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Are you sure that the shop is at exactly this place? Maybe it's located at gas station? commented 2025-08-21 15:23:10 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
| 167396908 (Comments: 1) | Bob the Blob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Bob, Feldwege/highway=track mit surface=gravel/Schotter sind nicht tracktype=grade1, höchstens grade2. Grade1 gilt nur für Asphalt, Pflastersteine o. Beton. Schöne Grüße commented 2025-08-21 15:20:29 UTC by wermak ♦117 |
| 170764428 (Comments: 1) | DH_ude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo DH_ude un willkommen bei OSM! Bitte trage keine Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen ein, wenn keine ausgeschildert sind! Für highway=living_street siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living_street VG hsc666 commented 2025-08-21 15:14:46 UTC by hsc666 ♦467 |
| 160041675 (Comments: 3) | HeiligerHein112 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, I didn't check for the other users in that area, sorry! I fixed it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170785431#map=19/50.836480/8.770883 Marc. commented 2025-08-21 15:14:00 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170756883 (Comments: 1) | sergej zhiliackov (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted because this settlement already exist on the map with names in all languages. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/540348494 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170785112 commented 2025-08-21 15:05:33 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
| 167620021 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Firma für IT-Dienstleistungen im Bereich Fracht/Spedition. Habe jetzt als Büro gekennzeichnet. Evtl aber doch IT-Dienstleister? commented 2025-08-21 14:55:27 UTC by matze089 ♦28 |
| 115256375 (Comments: 1) | Kynthos33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour, que signifie # AIT 2021 ? c'est un évènement ponctuel ? les grilles ne sont pas définitives ? à plus commented 2025-08-21 14:52:16 UTC by Vinber ♦805 |
| 168326197 (Comments: 3) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Habe es jetzt als Büro eingetragen commented 2025-08-21 14:50:04 UTC by matze089 ♦28 |
| 170777910 (Comments: 2) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour, je ne sais pas si vous avez vu mais ce changeset est actuellement en discussion sur https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/highway-service-access/36807/2 Pierre de Geovelo commented 2025-08-21 14:49:38 UTC by pierre_geovelo ♦14 |
| 167620002 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Vermutlich Geschäftsstelle. s. https://www.ttbl.de/imprint. Habe es jetzt als Büro eingetragen. commented 2025-08-21 14:48:52 UTC by matze089 ♦28 |
| 167620109 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Habe jetzt Fast Food (Crepe) angegeben, obwohl sich das falsch anfühlt. commented 2025-08-21 14:48:15 UTC by matze089 ♦28 |
| 170782815 (Comments: 1) | Janssens Serrurier (Discussed changesets: 1) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Thanks for adding your business on the map. But… please do not use changeset titles for promotional content, this is considered as spam. Also please do not change the geometry of buildings or add fals... commented 2025-08-21 14:44:56 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,527 |
| 168729717 (Comments: 4) | SzPaula (Discussed changesets: 26) | Rendben, bár ez így meglehetősen szubjektív. Nem fogom visszajavítatni, ha valaki módosítja. commented 2025-08-21 14:44:40 UTC by SzPaula ♦12 |
| 135617733 (Comments: 2) | *abq* (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ja, die Beschilderung ist leider nicht ganz eindeutig. Die Bsnnwald verordnungen im Bereich RP Freiburg erlauben in der Regel nur das Betreten markierter Wanderwege. Von daher würde ich am Tagging nix ändern wollen. Was du draus machst f&uu... commented 2025-08-21 14:44:16 UTC by *abq* ♦136 |
| 170440668 (Comments: 2) | Andrijana14 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Rokas_osm Danke für die Hinweise. Du hast recht, in Fribourg ist mir ein Fehler bei den Levels unterlaufen, ich werde das auch nochmals prüfen / anpassen. Die Footway in den Bahnhöfen erfassen wir grundsätzlich... commented 2025-08-21 14:40:58 UTC by Andrijana14 ♦1 |
| 162568391 (Comments: 3) | smarties (Discussed changesets: 85) | Moin, die Ladesäulen sind nun einzeln drin, daher hätte man die refs an die Säulen mappen können. Grüße commented 2025-08-21 14:37:20 UTC by ma-rt-in ♦1,755 |
| 169197961 (Comments: 15) | Crys64 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bon, alors c'est envoyé sous la réf 170783221. Suis preneur de commentaires... commented 2025-08-21 14:34:03 UTC by Crys64 ♦4 |
| 170566616 (Comments: 4) | CONTAN (Discussed changesets: 1) | A OK O zi bună l‐a fel commented 2025-08-21 14:06:41 UTC by CONTAN ♦2 |
| 168602796 (Comments: 1) | Alexander da Costa Amaral (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bitte kein Zeugs einfach verschieben oder mappen, damits auf der osm.org Karte besser aussieht - Es gibt gefühlt 3.000 Renderer und für jeden müsstest du das anders verschieben :D commented 2025-08-21 14:04:36 UTC by Negreheb ♦277 |
| 170571687 (Comments: 4) | davidvanthorre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Thank you for your edit : I couldn't make it by my app on the phone (CoMaps). commented 2025-08-21 13:50:44 UTC by davidvanthorre ♦1 |
| 170777191 (Comments: 2) | RCSH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Your deletion (which I have now undone) also encompassed a large portion of a tertiary road called "1st Louth Street". Has this street been closed to the public? commented 2025-08-21 13:49:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,456 |
| 170773498 (Comments: 1) | FL0815H (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dieser Changeset wurde revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170778377 commented 2025-08-21 13:47:36 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170772399 (Comments: 3) | Alexander da Costa Amaral (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey, ich möchte dich ins Forum einladen, wo eine Diskussion gestartet wurde https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-von-objekten-der-kritischen-infrastruktur/134484/3 commented 2025-08-21 13:45:46 UTC by Negreheb ♦277 |
| 169056635 (Comments: 1) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tilsvarende som de andre stedene: Nedenfor kommentaren min her vil du se at det står listet opp 3 veier ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605401525 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605401531 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415385710 )... commented 2025-08-21 13:43:49 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 169055808 (Comments: 3) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Stemmer! Det er fortsatt duplikat, de to vegene ser du i lista rett nedenfor min kommentar. Altså https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370552727 (den gamle stien du gjerne kan beholde) og https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415382711 (ny sti som du... commented 2025-08-21 13:37:37 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 170752794 (Comments: 1) | Windowsfan (Discussed changesets: 1) | These appear to be fictional edits, so I'm reverting them. OSM is not a toy. If you want to create fictional maps, you might enjoy UMap: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/. commented 2025-08-21 13:31:08 UTC by willkmis ♦178 |
| 170274635 (Comments: 2) | cocostreet (Discussed changesets: 1) | You are right, seems to be a duplication. But I can not verify it on site. commented 2025-08-21 13:20:19 UTC by Osmwithspace ♦168 |
| 133065329 (Comments: 3) | pfhllnts (Discussed changesets: 18) | Well, it wasn't "shortly", but now it should be fixed. commented 2025-08-21 13:12:51 UTC by pfhllnts ♦17 |
| 170727385 (Comments: 1) | Bluemoon Pizzeria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, Musiałem cofnąć tę edycję, bo niechcący została w niej przeciągnięta droga (zielona linia). Pizzeria (niebieska kropka) też chyba została dodana w nie do końca poprawnym miejscu, bo na środku drogi wewnętrznej (choć fak... commented 2025-08-21 13:00:31 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,774 |
| 170715881 (Comments: 1) | Meyer Menü (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo. Willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe bei der Durchsicht der Änderungen in dieser Region auch Eure Änderung an einigen Gebäudeumrissen bemerkt. Ich habe dazu ein paar Hinweise. In NRW dürfen wir sowohl die Luftbilder des Landes als ... commented 2025-08-21 12:55:02 UTC by Muhmaker ♦126 |
| 170750832 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | Naprawione commented 2025-08-21 12:45:51 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170143414 (Comments: 1) | Nicola Delfino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao👋, come da messaggio privato che ti ho scritto, hai aggiunto una stazione duplicata che era già presente, potresti controllare i messaggi privati e guardare ai suggerimenti che ti ho mandato? Aspetterò ancora un paio di gi... commented 2025-08-21 12:42:31 UTC by AwFi ♦33 |
| 170770873 (Comments: 1) | Little Mountain Dental (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of your buisness (no building near bey). commented 2025-08-21 12:40:50 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170775137 (Comments: 5) | PiMaster314 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wanneer je goed kijkt heb ik dat pad gesplitst in tweeën bij die rondgang De Vergulde Valk. Daar liep het pad over de hoofdrijbaan. commented 2025-08-21 12:30:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169933661 (Comments: 1) | xinot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hyvää työtä kentän uusien virkistysrakennelmien merkitsemisessä! commented 2025-08-21 12:23:59 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦66 |
| 170774786 (Comments: 4) | PiMaster314 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks voor de tip!! Dit is erg handig. MVG commented 2025-08-21 12:23:41 UTC by PiMaster314 ♦3 |
| 170774661 (Comments: 1) | Fowler High Precision (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welcome to OSM! Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170776650. commented 2025-08-21 12:19:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170703031 (Comments: 12) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 322) | Ja, fehlendes oder falschen forward/backward ist sehr gerne ein Fehler. Bei anderen muß man auch nach der Fehlerart schauen... Manchmal können Wegesegmente fehlen oder zu viel sein. Letzeres kann auch passieren, wenn highway-Segment... commented 2025-08-21 12:11:28 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,049 |
| 147895479 (Comments: 1) | Karthoo (Discussed changesets: 77) | Auch findet sich eine Mitfahrbank als Car pooling, passt hier ebenfalls https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking besser? Grüße APneunzehn74 commented 2025-08-21 12:10:47 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦149 |
| 170773934 (Comments: 1) | Stegink08 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dag Stegink.. Op een paaltje zetten we geen motor_vehicle = no Dat geeft weer problemen met bv moped en mofa. Auto's worden per default gestopt door een paaltje. Ik heb het aangepast. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%... commented 2025-08-21 12:05:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 151527136 (Comments: 1) | Karthoo (Discussed changesets: 77) | Hallo, diese Car pooling Mitfahrbank in diesem Chargenset ist das vielleicht eine https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking wie im Wiki beschrieben? Grüße APneunzehn74 commented 2025-08-21 12:05:00 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦149 |
| 167151255 (Comments: 1) | bigbug21 (Discussed changesets: 109) | Hallo, diese Mitfahrbank in diesem Chargenset ist das vielleicht eine https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking wie im Wiki beschrieben? Grüße APneunzehn74 commented 2025-08-21 11:56:51 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦149 |
| 162365017 (Comments: 1) | redd (Discussed changesets: 87) | Hallo, ist diese Bank vielleicht eine Mitfahrbank wie hier im Wiki beschrieben? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking Grüße APneunzehn74 commented 2025-08-21 11:52:15 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦149 |
| 170739027 (Comments: 1) | fundamentalist (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день! Спасибо за правки. Хочу отметить, что в велодорожка уже была отмечена: где велосипедные полосы тэгами к пешеходной дорожке: b... commented 2025-08-21 11:49:58 UTC by CometSeeker ♦22 |
| 165174997 (Comments: 1) | apca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. А это так задумано было чтобы тротуар улетел на центр дороги или ошибка какая-то? commented 2025-08-21 11:49:28 UTC by Mikhail Kuzin ♦2 |
| 159857550 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Give way markings aren't crossing markings. commented 2025-08-21 11:36:56 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 164152489 (Comments: 3) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 256) | Dlaczego tu jest natural=wood? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371994543 commented 2025-08-21 11:32:02 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,289 |
| 160143796 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Give way markings (two parallel rows of dashes) aren't crossing markings. commented 2025-08-21 11:19:04 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170465717 (Comments: 2) | Arianit (Discussed changesets: 5) | ah, I didn't know that. thanks! commented 2025-08-21 11:12:44 UTC by Arianit ♦3 |
| 170754908 (Comments: 5) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 74) | Ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du bei unserer gemeinsamen Diskussion im Forum dabei wärst. So können wir gemeinsam herausfinden, was wir denken und fühlen, und uns vielleicht sogar einigen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/... commented 2025-08-21 10:56:33 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170761927 (Comments: 3) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Google earth is not a permitted source due to the license. It is paramount that you ensure the sources you use are allowed. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data? https://w... commented 2025-08-21 10:55:57 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦41 |
| 170586872 (Comments: 1) | MapeoAlmería (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, ya se te ha baneado varias veces por este tipo de ediciones y se te han explicado los motivos. Algunos usuarios estamos intentando corregir la zona, pero insistes en añadir elementos que no existen, rompes lo que ya hemos corregid... commented 2025-08-21 10:51:30 UTC by kapazao ♦918 |
| 170410484 (Comments: 2) | meg_map (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, und danke für den Hinweis. Die Änderung zur Einbahnstraße war keine Absicht und ein Fehler. Werde es korrigieren. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-21 10:37:25 UTC by meg_map ♦10 |
| 170762741 (Comments: 1) | SalvadorBiedma (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, Salvador. Para indicar que se encuentra en la primera planta, use «addr:floor=1» (corregido). Si tiene alguna dirección donde además necesite indicar la letra, puede combinar las etiquetas «addr:str... commented 2025-08-21 10:26:23 UTC by dcapillae ♦372 |
| 170760291 (Comments: 1) | 95927717 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo 95927717, kannst Du mir erklären, warum du aus den nebeneinanderstehenden Einzelgaragen auf dem Parkplatz der Quellentalklinik ein Multipolygon gemacht hast, das wohl ein Gebäude mit mehreren Garagen darstellen soll? Wenn ic... commented 2025-08-21 10:20:10 UTC by klik ♦28 |
| 170769559 (Comments: 1) | antamauna (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-21 10:10:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 169056960 (Comments: 2) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hmm? Jeg finner ikke natural taggen der nå lenger. commented 2025-08-21 10:09:28 UTC by wazabi ♦2 |
| 170392562 (Comments: 1) | Kyle Alden (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (se... commented 2025-08-21 10:08:55 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170695895 (Comments: 2) | seurish (Discussed changesets: 1) | my bad commented 2025-08-21 10:07:24 UTC by seurish ♦1 |
| 170728954 (Comments: 2) | onomatopoeia (Discussed changesets: 2) | I do take this moment to celebrate this❕❕🎉🎊 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170728954 commented 2025-08-21 10:04:30 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170766790 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Teil-Revert , Hydrant wurde 100 Meter verschoben. Bitte besser aufpassen!!! commented 2025-08-21 09:58:13 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 138161512 (Comments: 1) | shurakarpenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | «Картофельный кемпинг» — это реальное название кэмпинга или локальный мем? commented 2025-08-21 09:56:36 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
| 170755081 (Comments: 1) | ifhdj239149j (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi您好 OpenStreetMap為一即時的系統，一旦送出即在資料庫當中，甚至可能被用OpenStreetMap為資料來源服務取用。如有測試需求請用測試站 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170769107 commented 2025-08-21 09:54:20 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,472 |
| 170676563 (Comments: 6) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dziękuję za pomoc! commented 2025-08-21 09:45:53 UTC by driedfish ♦3 |
| 161983054 (Comments: 8) | VLD292 (Discussed changesets: 7) | I'm actually based in London rather than Manchester, but stayed there last weekend. I noticed some unusual behaviour planning running routes and while using StreetComplete/SCEE and decided to take a closer look. In the last year, there wa... commented 2025-08-21 09:29:49 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 143945011 (Comments: 1) | TripleBee (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! I noticed that, with this changeset, you added exit_to=* on motorway junctions nodes. Beware that exit_to=* is considered deprecated, as it is imprecise, in favor of destination=* tags. Regards. commented 2025-08-21 09:27:50 UTC by Penegal ♦26 |
| 170440799 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 1) | which kind of vehicles can be bought/rented here? "scooter" is ambiguous. commented 2025-08-21 09:13:13 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 170726051 (Comments: 1) | Portal Master (Discussed changesets: 1) | What is the source of this edit? There is no change in FHRS. Cheers Phil commented 2025-08-21 09:11:15 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,384 |
| 170663251 (Comments: 4) | EryrEryri (Discussed changesets: 3) | Helo, diolch! Dwi ddim yn credu ein bod yn gallu defnyddio’r map yma gan Gyngor Gwynedd am ei fod yn defnyddio data hawlfreintiedig gan yr Arolwg Ordnans - mae’n rhaid i ddata fod yn gydnaws â thrwydded OpenStreetMap (sef yr ... commented 2025-08-21 09:00:45 UTC by ceirios ♦58 |
| 170763784 (Comments: 1) | JordiG1694 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Jordy, Lijkt me oke. Ik heb wel die G13 tags verwijderd van het lijnelement. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-21 08:53:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 155150413 (Comments: 4) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 83) | pertang bij https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_rental geeft de wiki aan om wel de rental tag te gebruiken. Da's ook niet consequent.. en sorry voor uwe CS te spammen :D commented 2025-08-21 08:53:17 UTC by dentonny ♦123 |
| 170760883 (Comments: 8) | swirdz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik zal er permit van maken... Dan klopt er iets niet in het bordenbestand van de overheid. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-21 08:50:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 168882019 (Comments: 2) | Crys64 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dans un premier temps, j'ai tenté l'hypothèse que l'itinéraire reste sur le chemin de Gourzy partout où il existe encore, et sur la piste forestière sinon. Ca reste à vérifier/ajuster. commented 2025-08-21 08:49:56 UTC by StC ♦310 |
| 170763280 (Comments: 1) | Paul van der Heijden (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Paul... Geen versmalling , maar iets anders? Zo te zien is het een barrier=table Die kun je het best op die oversteek zetten. MVG eggie MVG eggie commented 2025-08-21 08:44:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169520946 (Comments: 1) | Google nature (Discussed changesets: 4) | Olá, Verifico que alterou o valor "ele". Posso questionar sobre qual a fonte usada? Obrigado. commented 2025-08-21 08:42:14 UTC by hvalentim ♦93 |
| 170764224 (Comments: 1) | Teus68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-21 08:37:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170763317 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 107) | He usado «shop=artificial_turf» para designar el establecimiento donde se vende césped artificial a falta de una etiqueta alternativa mejor establecida. commented 2025-08-21 08:13:08 UTC by dcapillae ♦372 |
| 170739969 (Comments: 1) | BSapp5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! Please note: an address is only complete if addr:housenumber and addr:street are present. commented 2025-08-21 08:11:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170631278 (Comments: 2) | McCio (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi. Why did you revert my edit without even mentioning it to me? commented 2025-08-21 08:07:12 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦642 |
| 170762578 (Comments: 1) | DD1GJ (Discussed changesets: 96) | Falscher Kommentar, Richtig: Syntax der Öffungszeiten korrigiert commented 2025-08-21 07:58:24 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 170720319 (Comments: 2) | miche101 (Discussed changesets: 67) | ja das ist ein wenig uneinheitlich ausgeschildert.. Also an jeder Einfahrt ein wenig anders.. müsste man nochmal anschauen.. Wenn ich rechts erinnere mussten die Straßen so gebaut werden wegen Brandschutzvorgaben... sonst wür... commented 2025-08-21 07:57:44 UTC by miche101 ♦144 |
| 170762568 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 369) | wrong comment: merge two nodes on the same psoition commented 2025-08-21 07:56:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170744800 (Comments: 1) | Will Gattiker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I have never actually come across a notation stating that you must meet a certain requirement in order to use a parking space. Nevertheless, I have changed your notation because there cannot be an equal sign in the key. commented 2025-08-21 07:54:14 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170760687 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Rene, danke für Den Engagement, aber Du machst leider zu viele Fehler, die dann in der Qualitätssicherung auffallen. Hier ist es z.B. die Syntax der Öffnungszeiten, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours |
| 170760370 (Comments: 1) | Luyckx_S (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi.. Je kunt zoiets het beste gewoon even hier vragen. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/139 gr eggie commented 2025-08-21 07:27:24 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170749494 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-21 07:27:15 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170709684 (Comments: 2) | Sisay Alemu (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi Kpedido, I was trying to indicate that this vending machine vends multiple items, including snacks, drinks, sweets and e-cigarettes. However, OSM does not accept multiple entries of the same key (e.g., vending = e-cigarettes and vending = food), a... commented 2025-08-21 07:22:03 UTC by Sisay Alemu ♦1 |
| 170759480 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Teilrevert 170759664 170759480 170757284 wg. verschobener Straßen, siehe obige Warnungen.Das nachträgliche korrigieren hatte weitere Fehler verursacht! commented 2025-08-21 07:18:45 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 89139680 (Comments: 1) | F5ZV (Discussed changesets: 10) | même question pour l'intersection de celui-ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835362672 avec les chemins commented 2025-08-21 07:10:36 UTC by frosm ♦1,134 |
| 170748230 (Comments: 1) | ཀᯩ͓͕༐͢ 𑇄᷏̑̑͡⃟⃝ꌓຼ̸̕ 𝝛нiunee 𖡄nkrateia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I can hardly see any buildings in the aerial photos, but rather trees at the locations. commented 2025-08-21 07:10:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170748108 (Comments: 1) | ཀᯩ͓͕༐͢ 𑇄᷏̑̑͡⃟⃝ꌓຼ̸̕ 𝝛нiunee 𖡄nkrateia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I can hardly see any buildings in the aerial photos, but rather trees at the locations. commented 2025-08-21 07:10:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170753129 (Comments: 2) | Patryk2710 (Discussed changesets: 102) | "lepsze zdjęcie niż kategoria, zdjęcie się wyświetla na OpenAEDMap" mapy.com mają gdzieś całe Wikimedia bo uparli się na Wikidata a dane Wikidata nie zawsze są dostępne a jeżeli już to nie zawsze mają fotę i to taką s... commented 2025-08-21 07:06:54 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦513 |
| 170721861 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Please don't change `=footway` + `indoor=yes` to `=corridor` . Many applications don't support the latter, and it doesn't solve `=steps` . Most `=corridor` are already double-tagged with `indoor=yes` , meaning it's quite meaningle... commented 2025-08-21 07:06:38 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,583 |
| 164978733 (Comments: 4) | HSL_PALAUTE (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hei, ja kiitos vastauksestasi! Noista kerrostalojen pihateiden läpireitityksistä (niissä tapauksissa, jolloin pihalla todella on "Ei läpikulkua" tai "Yksityisalue" -merkki) oli pitkä keskustelu OSM comunit... commented 2025-08-21 07:04:07 UTC by Tolstoi21 ♦23 |
| 170757846 (Comments: 1) | jacobwhall (Discussed changesets: 32) | https://www.reddit.com/r/rva/comments/27bcaj/richmonds_mcvcapitol_square_underground_tunnel/ commented 2025-08-21 07:04:03 UTC by jacobwhall ♦43 |
| 170751417 (Comments: 1) | Do_not_find (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You move the node https://www.osm.org/node/4226758890 (a bus stop) more 100 meters. Please check the position. If you need help: You are welcome. commented 2025-08-21 06:58:50 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170753250 (Comments: 1) | RiyaNandy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You move the node https://www.osm.org/node/11240409070 (a firehydrant) more than 100 meters. Please check the position! If you need help: You are welcome! commented 2025-08-21 06:55:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170757915 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert Hallo Rene Lübeck, willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz komplett zurückgesetzt, da Du ein großes Chaos verursacht hattest: verschobene Straßen, gelöschte Bushaltestelle, ... Siehe http... commented 2025-08-21 06:52:05 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 170587996 (Comments: 3) | Agaric (Discussed changesets: 16) | I just used the usual reference tool to check the results https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ commented 2025-08-21 06:44:44 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 170713161 (Comments: 4) | RuudBNL (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dan dus geen block maar een barrier=sump_buster osm.wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dsump_buster Een carter-killer (ook gebruikt voor landbouwsluis) Ik heb het aangepast. Groet eggie commented 2025-08-21 06:29:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 164263245 (Comments: 2) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 57) | landuse tree pit + natural shrubbery Is doorgevoerd commented 2025-08-21 06:23:13 UTC by Op'tRad ♦45 |
| 170749424 (Comments: 1) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-21 06:19:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170421256 (Comments: 12) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | @Mateusz - miałem zdublowany jeden cytat w komentarzu a teraz widać zdublowane aż dwa komentarze. Wprawdzie myszka mi świruje (Mouse Double Click) ale te podwójne komentarze pojawiły się raczej dopiero po moim drugim komentarzu. ... commented 2025-08-21 06:18:34 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦513 |
| 170748684 (Comments: 1) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Kijk even hoe ik het heb aangepast. parking_space is altijd één vakje.. De street_side tags zit om alles heen. Daar staan de eigenschappen op als orientation, capacity e.d. commented 2025-08-21 06:18:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170749616 (Comments: 1) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Deze zou je nog kunnen aanpassen zoals ik op het Engels Dorp heb gedaan. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-21 06:15:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170749157 (Comments: 2) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ik heb wat aangepast CTRL-F5 voor het effect. Het zijn nu parkeervakken (parking_space) met daaromheen een amenity=parking parking=street_side. Kijk even hoe het in elkaar zit. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side |
| 170685473 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 862) | Thanks. What tool did you use for that?? commented 2025-08-21 06:10:01 UTC by Agaric ♦16 |
| 170340742 (Comments: 1) | Mapman453 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, The HA PRoW reference isn't the formal name for these footpaths. As far as I'm aware very few footpaths have formal or local names. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-08-21 05:55:11 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,896 |
| 162524826 (Comments: 1) | setokynet (Discussed changesets: 5) | いつも全体的に何の情報を基にして編集されているのかわからないのですが、この編集で追加された、少なくとも4つのスポーツクラブは何故そこに置かれているのかわかりません。 |
| 170549774 (Comments: 2) | CJLIN (Discussed changesets: 3) | 已經由社群成員移除改為正確標示： https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170753852 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170549774 ... commented 2025-08-21 05:13:52 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,472 |
| 170755535 (Comments: 1) | analysisofspatialdata (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you accidentally dragged 8 Stocks Road node from its correct location. commented 2025-08-21 05:12:59 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170727454 (Comments: 3) | m_zahariev (Discussed changesets: 15) | Благодаря commented 2025-08-21 05:11:35 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦684 |
| 127286643 (Comments: 1) | CJLIN (Discussed changesets: 3) | 你好： 好像看起來怪怪的，比對其他地圖以及政府的公告資訊，應該不是公園吧？ 注意OpenStreetMap歡迎基於事實的編輯，但不能假冒事物，甚至為了遊戲關係加假公園 參考：http... commented 2025-08-21 05:09:00 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,472 |
| 170549674 (Comments: 1) | CJLIN (Discussed changesets: 3) | 你好： 好像看起來怪怪的，比對其他地圖以及政府的公告資訊，應該不是公園吧？ 注意OpenStreetMap歡迎基於事實的編輯，但不能假冒事物，甚至為了遊戲關係加假公園 參考：http... commented 2025-08-21 05:08:47 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,472 |
| 170753605 (Comments: 1) | Mahmoudnoreldin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the tree row is not present in satellite image and the footway appears incorrect. commented 2025-08-21 04:33:08 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170753536 (Comments: 1) | fridged006 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the building draw at 7-9 Wadham Parade is actually two separate houses commented 2025-08-21 04:25:55 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 167836355 (Comments: 6) | DKTR99921222 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ano, je to tak, ten nástroj za to nemůže a ty "škody" jsou pouze mým dílem díky tomu, že jsem se s tím nástrojem učil pracovat. A jestli to ještě není jasné, tak... commented 2025-08-21 03:39:16 UTC by DKTR99921222 ♦4 |
| 166756700 (Comments: 2) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 88) | Thanks! Yes that was my mistake, fixed now. commented 2025-08-21 02:59:30 UTC by aharvey ♦1,784 |
| 170547108 (Comments: 2) | mgb95 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catch. That was inadvertent. I'm not entirely sure how to undo it, but I'll try. If it's easy for you to do it, please feel free to do so. commented 2025-08-21 02:30:23 UTC by mgb95 ♦1 |
| 170548581 (Comments: 2) | alanmcd (Discussed changesets: 6) | The intended change applies to only a small parcel of the boundaries commented 2025-08-21 02:29:25 UTC by alanmcd ♦3 |
| 146224514 (Comments: 1) | leandro rajovitzky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Si es algo temporal no es lo mejor borrarla, primero porque igual demora en que los consumidores y las apps que usan los datos les llegue la actualizacion, y segundo porque ahora 18 meses despues sigue sin estar mapeada. Por otro lado se pierde el hi... commented 2025-08-21 02:16:08 UTC by muralito ♦2,047 |
| 170752817 (Comments: 1) | Webblittt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for updating these roads, do you know what road number has been assigned? If it's an A road it should be marked as primary, if it's a B road then secondary. If you know the number it you could add it under ref for all the section... commented 2025-08-21 02:12:12 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦82 |
| 170726379 (Comments: 1) | Support WFD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have you finished the iD tutorial? It's helpful! wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building commented 2025-08-21 02:08:25 UTC by citrula ♦897 |
| 170732061 (Comments: 1) | texlug (Discussed changesets: 2) | looks good to me! commented 2025-08-21 01:52:40 UTC by citrula ♦897 |
| 170732539 (Comments: 1) | texlug (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your contribution. This looks good to me. If you are able to use the gate at Bagdad on a bike you might want to add foot=permissive and bicycle=permissive access tags, as well. commented 2025-08-21 01:50:16 UTC by citrula ♦897 |
| 170644746 (Comments: 1) | RM23 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for adding the new PG County bus routes! Your work looks pretty good so far, but let me know if you need any help. commented 2025-08-21 00:18:25 UTC by andrewth1 ♦8 |
| 170717816 (Comments: 2) | alhambraparcmiami (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have manually reverted you changeset as, after a conversation with others on the OSMUS slack, and not getting anything back from you after multiple hours it seems that this changeset is SEO spam and thus it was undone. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-08-21 00:12:40 UTC by Udarian ♦445 |
| X | 170750642 (Comments: 2) | samuelzammit (Discussed changesets: 6) | And 109A instead of N82. commented 2025-08-20 23:42:28 UTC by samuelzammit ♦4 |
| 170701905 (Comments: 2) | JohnIbrahim20 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, is Waverly Orthopaedic Clinic really a hospital, or is there a better tag for this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170701905 commented 2025-08-20 23:42:19 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170704922 (Comments: 1) | Zakariya Mohamed (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. It looks like you ... commented 2025-08-20 23:35:38 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170698398 (Comments: 1) | dpcastrob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you spotted a building in the imagery but the footprint you mapped is not as accutrate as the imagery allows becasue it is oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population e... commented 2025-08-20 23:30:43 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170695759 (Comments: 1) | ATownBike (Discussed changesets: 2) | There appears to be two bike ways for the Tommy Thompson Parkway. User MulhollandWildcatCWU added them. Only one exists. I'd recommend keeping the one with the relation and removing the other. Can you do that or do you need help? ... commented 2025-08-20 23:21:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170695345 (Comments: 1) | ATownBike (Discussed changesets: 2) | ou tagged this as a bicycle road which should only happen if the road is signed. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes Also, the tag kerb extension ios typically a node where the curb extends out. --- |
| 170749642 (Comments: 2) | Js7h (Discussed changesets: 4) | Nachtrag: Das Verzeichnis zu finden in https://www.verkehr.steiermark.at/cms/ziel/155689159/DE/ folgt jener Version des GIS Steiermark; daher erscheint mir die Version GIS Steiermark bzw. obiger Seite die aktuelle zu sein. commented 2025-08-20 23:04:36 UTC by Js7h ♦3 |
| 170705335 (Comments: 2) | tomi002 (Discussed changesets: 7) | no niby jest tabliczka bliżej cyty oraz w 2024 niby też zaraz na tym właśnie odcinku przy tym hybrydowym przejciu dla pieszych w rowerowym, co zostało ogłoszone jednak nielegalnym ;d commented 2025-08-20 23:00:35 UTC by Yog Sot ♦267 |
| 159623707 (Comments: 2) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi there, I mapped this about a year ago and revisited it recently. I still need to go into this further, as I have yet to do on-the-ground research for this. That said, I have cut up some of the segments to reflect this, so I thought that I had done... commented 2025-08-20 22:53:28 UTC by Ktr101 ♦23 |
| 170608022 (Comments: 3) | Mashin (Discussed changesets: 39) | Alright, thank you for letting me know. These trails are not endorsed, but do exist on various mountain biking websites and such. You are totally correct - I do feel like a cycleway might more refer to urban greenways. Even though I agree these trail... commented 2025-08-20 22:49:51 UTC by Dean Batchelder ♦1 |
| 153897627 (Comments: 1) | Js7h (Discussed changesets: 4) | Relation "Rechberg Straße" wurde mittlerweilse verlegt, allerdings ist die Reihenfolge der Abschnitte nicht korrekt, dazu siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170749485#map=15/47.20461/15.64157 commented 2025-08-20 22:31:57 UTC by Js7h ♦3 |
| 170311383 (Comments: 1) | Just_Miha (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее ... commented 2025-08-20 22:26:48 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,036 |
| 170295751 (Comments: 1) | Kirall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не шалите commented 2025-08-20 22:25:00 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,036 |
| 170743375 (Comments: 2) | Jos Hebing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ik zie al waar het verschil ontstaat, de tag use_sidepath is in de browser niet beschikbaar commented 2025-08-20 22:23:04 UTC by Jos Hebing ♦6 |
| 170743484 (Comments: 4) | Jos Hebing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dat komt omdat paden die op slot staan veel minder duidelijk renderen op de standaardkaart. commented 2025-08-20 22:15:02 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 167506023 (Comments: 3) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | No a tie su oznacene ako sukromne. Tak ked uz to je ako parkovisko, nech to niekoho nelaka ako verejne parkovanie. Ak sa tam naozaj auta dostavaju cez travu, nemusime kreslit cestu. Dakujem commented 2025-08-20 22:06:38 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170746165 (Comments: 3) | Dani CS (Discussed changesets: 11) | La clave «faculty» se usa tanto en nodos como en áreas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:faculty. No necesita «area=yes». commented 2025-08-20 22:05:57 UTC by dcapillae ♦372 |
| 170747153 (Comments: 5) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ik heb charging point veranderd naar charging_station. Dan zal het symbool renderen. Moet wel zeggen dat de wiki steeds weer met wat nieuws komt en de kaartenmakers het denk ik niet bij kunnen houden met de rendering. commented 2025-08-20 21:55:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170746614 (Comments: 1) | Yentel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-20 21:51:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170232337 (Comments: 3) | Mardaterra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ningún problema. Cualquier duda que puedas tener siempre puedes contactar con el grupo de Galicia (https://t.me/osmgalicia), donde estarán encantados de colaborar. Un saludo, Jesús López OpenStreetMap Foun... commented 2025-08-20 21:36:16 UTC by jeslop ♦4,243 |
| 149028741 (Comments: 7) | Alec Coates (Discussed changesets: 7) | Apologies, I wasn't try to accuse you of anything. I just disagree with the assessment, opening a community discussion seems like a sensible move. commented 2025-08-20 21:35:21 UTC by Alec Coates ♦8 |
| 170126977 (Comments: 2) | Tomasz Paprodziad (Discussed changesets: 11) | Byłem i widziałem. Dom Kultury przeniesiony na północny zachód "Zameczek". commented 2025-08-20 21:30:37 UTC by Tomasz Paprodziad ♦8 |
| 166170173 (Comments: 3) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Automaticky importovat z katastra neviem ani ja (plugin do JOSM uz tusim nefunguje). Da sa importovat z inych zdrojov budov, ale tam tiez nie som spokojny s presnostou. Minimalne sa vsak da podlozit ako vrstva a obkreslovat rucne priamo v JOSM... commented 2025-08-20 21:28:57 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170716583 (Comments: 4) | jmaspons (Discussed changesets: 18) | I això em fa pensar en què vol dir "nom en català". "nom" i prou, potser, en general. commented 2025-08-20 21:28:26 UTC by quelgir ♦4 |
| 170665229 (Comments: 3) | sharp gift (Discussed changesets: 5) | Heh, sorry I didn't mean to insinuate anything or be so blunt in my question. I have been using the contact prefix for everything in Bexhill and just wondered if I was acting misguided, thanks. commented 2025-08-20 21:22:03 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦97 |
| 170747712 (Comments: 1) | su91 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-20 21:21:33 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170720251 (Comments: 3) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok dzieki za poprawki :) commented 2025-08-20 21:13:26 UTC by David_Serum ♦3 |
| 166685061 (Comments: 8) | EfreetSK (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dobre, dakujem. commented 2025-08-20 21:12:48 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 124725260 (Comments: 3) | priean (Discussed changesets: 6) | Otazka cie miesto servisu zrazu moze byt v dome parkovisko. No treba to tam preverit. commented 2025-08-20 21:05:24 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 149479643 (Comments: 1) | osmoid (Discussed changesets: 30) | Két szezonban volt nem működőnek jelölve az egyébként működő csap. Ez egy jó példája annak, hogy egy márciusban még nem üzemelő csapot miért nem kéne disus... commented 2025-08-20 21:01:53 UTC by BáthoryPéter ♦82 |
| 170746088 (Comments: 1) | Yoelpichula (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. El local no es el número de la dirección. El Local va como addr:unit=. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170746088 commented 2025-08-20 21:00:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 169671528 (Comments: 3) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 110) | Zdravim. Preco by C a D neboli spravne? A kde akoze koncia ked nie su po celej dlzke? Ved to vyzera zamerne tak postavene, ze je to cele jedno velke nastupiste. Elektrickove tak mozu byt dlhe ale autobusove nie? Nerozumiem v com je problem. ... commented 2025-08-20 20:57:43 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 164198543 (Comments: 1) | Loneship (Discussed changesets: 13) | Danke fürs eintragen! Ich hab mal die 5 GW auf 5 MW korrigiert. :) commented 2025-08-20 20:56:22 UTC by GorgorMith ♦12 |
| 170743711 (Comments: 1) | LukaJorjoliani (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted with respect to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17854258 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17854260 : structurally these are parts of a single building connected by a stylobate https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... commented 2025-08-20 20:50:46 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 167405887 (Comments: 9) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nie, na highway=service naozaj netrvam. Len mi to prislo vhodnejsie ked som sa tam pohyboval a videl som ako to tam vyzera. Tu znacku o obytnej zone som si asi ani nevsimol. commented 2025-08-20 20:50:10 UTC by ticho2 ♦18 |
| 65169595 (Comments: 3) | guillemmal (Discussed changesets: 24) | Listo! Gracias! commented 2025-08-20 20:49:15 UTC by muralito ♦2,047 |
| 170624042 (Comments: 3) | Maximvs_7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | In addition, I am now also using a cadastral map (WMS) taken from the Revenue Agency website (https://www.agenziaentrate.gov.it/portale/documents/20143/260417/Manuale+consultazione+cartografia_Documentazione+descrittiva+del+servizio+di+consultazione+... commented 2025-08-20 20:46:02 UTC by Maximvs_7 ♦1 |
| 169668114 (Comments: 3) | priean (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ak chcete tak to urobte, tych dojazdov je vsak dost vela po Bratislave a variantov tras bude dost. Len teda kym relaciu neozivite odstanenim tych prefixov disused: tak je zbytocne ich menit na trasy ktorymi nechodili. commented 2025-08-20 20:45:20 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 169671055 (Comments: 4) | priean (Discussed changesets: 6) | To je ale chyba mapy, asi zatial nevykresluje tuto hodnotu. To neznamena, ze sa ma kvoli mape (a ktorej? napr. OsmAnd ju zobrazoval) ohybat znacka. To je v OSM zakazane. Takze aky je dobry dovod? commented 2025-08-20 20:42:25 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 169578337 (Comments: 4) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 110) | Chapem, zapisal som len route_ref na zastavku, podla toho, ze bola v relacii linky. Ale nemenil som relaciu, ktora teda bola nespravna uz pred tymito zmenami. Dakujem za opravu. commented 2025-08-20 20:41:07 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 131973926 (Comments: 1) | Joao Duailibe (João Duailibe) (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello João Duailibe, I noticed you added this ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137054780), however I don’t see a ferry terminal at the north end of the route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137054782) in aerial ... commented 2025-08-20 20:34:50 UTC by maps_not_naps ♦4 |
| 170712665 (Comments: 1) | Ulyanov24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | неверная правка. Ознакомьтесь с классификацией дорог у меня в профиле. Откачу. commented 2025-08-20 20:30:52 UTC by literan ♦6,755 |
| 170710060 (Comments: 1) | edgard_m (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hvor har du navnet fra? Kilde tak! Jeg kan ikke finde noget om det nogen steder. commented 2025-08-20 20:30:03 UTC by b-holdet ♦325 |
| 137137215 (Comments: 1) | Rafal1984 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4920781 - czym jest ten słupek? jest tam tablica informacyjna? kod qr? numer słupka i tyle? commented 2025-08-20 20:29:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170742265 (Comments: 1) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Formeel is het een path, maar motor_vehicle=no geeft wel problemen met moped en mofa dus mofa en moped=yes toevoegen. Het langsliggende pad is een G12a Gr eggie commented 2025-08-20 20:27:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 105728196 (Comments: 1) | Arikarindokuta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4920778 ? commented 2025-08-20 20:27:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170743030 (Comments: 2) | Jos Hebing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Tagging van fietspaden: G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway commented 2025-08-20 20:23:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170727129 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Reverting because of unnecessary modification #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170746155 commented 2025-08-20 20:20:05 UTC by TinPetreković ♦110 |
| 170745183 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Reverting because of unnecessary modification #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170746100 commented 2025-08-20 20:18:26 UTC by TinPetreković ♦110 |
| 169600416 (Comments: 2) | Janderhamster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry for sounding harsh. I know you had the best of intentions. I'm more mad at Google Maps for just (maybe I'm wrong on this) making up names for places. commented 2025-08-20 20:15:24 UTC by ginnyTheCat ♦6 |
| 170295021 (Comments: 4) | KSP MUC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich habe die Wege wiederhergestellt und mit dem Tag access=no versehen. commented 2025-08-20 20:13:51 UTC by CaptainCrunch ♦25 |
 | 170729168 (Comments: 1) | Rene Sato (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-20 20:03:49 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦122 |
| 170691275 (Comments: 7) | Djack_UA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, thank you. Sorry again. I don't know how to divide a large multipolygon into smaller parts. Therefore, I will not adjust this polygon anymore. commented 2025-08-20 20:00:50 UTC by Djack_UA ♦3 |
| 170739657 (Comments: 5) | aparra09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buena, hablemos por ahí. Saludos commented 2025-08-20 19:59:22 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170738873 (Comments: 3) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die editor geeft denk ik suggesties.. maar daar hoef je geen gevolg aan te geven. Mapse commented 2025-08-20 19:50:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170741242 (Comments: 3) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Alle begin is moeilijk en osm kent wel een heel steile leercurve. Iedereen was ooit beginner. Mapse.. eggie commented 2025-08-20 19:47:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170739374 (Comments: 2) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Yes thanks! Ik had het inmiddels ook gevonden op de wiki. Als het goed is had ik de wijziging in de volgende edit ook weer ongedaan gemaakt. commented 2025-08-20 19:46:05 UTC by oko2708 ♦6 |
| 170703540 (Comments: 3) | LudovicG (Discussed changesets: 22) | office=yes ne peut être faux. Après effectivement j'avais vu qu'il n'y avait pas consensus. Le plus simple c'est de se connecter au forum avec son identifiant OSM et de demander si on peut converger. Si la discussion ... commented 2025-08-20 19:35:08 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 170581278 (Comments: 7) | Jos Hebing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Goed inzoomen dan zie je beter wat je doet. Dat onbedoeld verplaatsen komt omdat je iets per abuis geselecteerd hebt. Selecteren doe je met de linkermuisknop...maar schuiven ook. Op het moment dat je de kaart verschuift en die kaart schuift ... commented 2025-08-20 19:34:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169627550 (Comments: 1) | Hella Fred (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hella Fred, this is another of my change sets that you've deleted. I'd ask that you reverse your deletion so that OSM can reflect the truth on the ground. commented 2025-08-20 19:33:50 UTC by Toby H Ferguson ♦2 |
| 170712329 (Comments: 1) | GermanTaxi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, die Adresse ist bereits www.openstreetmap.org/way/327155083 zugeordnet. Die Adressdublette allein ist schon ein Problem. In OSM wird recht großzügig mit Adressen umgegangen; dennoch gilt grundsätzlich (mit meinen W... commented 2025-08-20 19:32:33 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 169177367 (Comments: 1) | Hella Fred (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hella Fred, I understand your concerns regarding this dataset and hence your deletion. However OSM's 'how we map' clearly states that we map what's on the ground and that we don't perform deletions unless we know somet... commented 2025-08-20 19:32:12 UTC by Toby H Ferguson ♦2 |
| 170703186 (Comments: 3) | LudovicG (Discussed changesets: 22) | j'imagine effectivement qu'il n'y a pas de panneaux de fin de zone de 30 aux débuts, et de début de zone de 30 aux fins, de la partie sans véhicule à moteur :-). Même si on voit de tout ! commented 2025-08-20 19:29:16 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 169784945 (Comments: 1) | Yffo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I have reverted this changeset as you made the road that runs through Örebro Resecentrum a zigzag by moving the bus stop nodes to the platforms. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170744157 commented 2025-08-20 19:26:51 UTC by _Madfly ♦15 |
| 170713577 (Comments: 1) | dodokamo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen: Wurde das alte Gebäude tatsächlich abgerissen? Wenn nein: dann bitte wiederherstellen. [Sehe ich das richtig, dass du das Gebä... commented 2025-08-20 19:12:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170683346 (Comments: 7) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Na bestudering van OSM documentatie en uitproberen van andere lifecycle schemes, uiteindelijk toch maar gekozen voor disused:highway=track. Waarschijnlijk zal deze weg op den duur toch verdwijnen. Toch vond ik de weergave op de kaart passender met... commented 2025-08-20 19:11:14 UTC by JR_Nl ♦7 |
| 170693749 (Comments: 2) | HaraldH2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo David ich habe die schräge vermutlich ehemalige Bahnlinie gelöscht. Der Radweg verläuft über den Weg commented 2025-08-20 19:08:17 UTC by HaraldH2 ♦1 |
| 170645867 (Comments: 1) | Sredoje (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sve izmene na administrativnoj granici su Vam obrisane. Granice u Srbiji dolaze iz RGZ-a i vec su unete, a imamo i sistem da se primeti kada se pokvare. Molimo ne menjajte vise administrativne granice. Vidim da se ne javljate ni drugim korisnicima, p... commented 2025-08-20 19:05:41 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦311 |
| 170154678 (Comments: 2) | jeka p (Discussed changesets: 112) | Hi! thanks - I'm glad it works! .... I will definetely need helt with that, but a bit later. I'm still working on my surveys during the trip. And I want to finish them first. commented 2025-08-20 18:55:44 UTC by jeka p ♦222 |
| 164900975 (Comments: 1) | Minion04 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Partially reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170742631): The roof of Fort den Haakweg 34 not simply "gabled". https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279010013 commented 2025-08-20 18:44:27 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦63 |
| 169474020 (Comments: 14) | Hobby Mapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ist es so schwer, im wiki access=private zu finden und die Erläuterung dazu zu verstehen? commented 2025-08-20 18:38:14 UTC by Protoxenus ♦318 |
| 87916258 (Comments: 2) | Lachgast (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hoi Marc, Bedankt voor het nakijken! Leuk, zo'n oude koe; tof om te zien hoe de manier van werken is veranderd met de jaren. Dit moet denk ik zijn geweest landuse=grass, ofschoon er dan overlap zou zijn geweest met de oude 3dshapes... commented 2025-08-20 18:37:39 UTC by Lachgast ♦121 |
| 170738790 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hoi.. Je vraagt feedback .. Lijkt me inderdaad zo beter. Je kunt zo'n basketballveldje ook als vlak intekenen. Dat is gebruikelijker. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 18:37:37 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169900824 (Comments: 4) | NunoCaldeira (Discussed changesets: 22) | hello +1, need to fix all other issue like this 2 nodes : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13045451926 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13045767654 commented 2025-08-20 18:30:41 UTC by didier2020 ♦92 |
| 166837845 (Comments: 1) | Rezasfd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello You have used tags that do not exist in Iran. If you return the wrong tag, you will be reported. commented 2025-08-20 18:26:38 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦422 |
| 170741359 (Comments: 1) | Damian05 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-08-20 18:21:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170597850 (Comments: 2) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 15) | Merhabalar, Sancaktepe Belediyesinin yapmış olduğu proje ile bölgedeki ilgili sokakların tamamına yönelik yayalaştırma çalışması yürütülmektedir. Bu tarz sokaklar için yaya yolu kullanımı doğrudur. ... commented 2025-08-20 18:15:56 UTC by Alikam ♦7 |
 | 166131977 (Comments: 1) | Johnny Carlsen (Discussed changesets: 48) | Landuse=2 What's that supposed to indicate? Best regards Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group commented 2025-08-20 18:07:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 140414905 (Comments: 1) | luisrobledomx1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892131870#map=15/25.34925/-102.78693 landuse=2 ?? What do you mean Best regards Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group commented 2025-08-20 18:06:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170196095 (Comments: 5) | DasKartenSchaf (Discussed changesets: 6) | Humph... I guess this requires some knowledge of how the cable cars work and what is needed to make them work again. But I lack it. I would put more attention on whether the condition is marked with a separate tag (whichever) or with a prefix. Wit... commented 2025-08-20 17:47:36 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170090583 (Comments: 2) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Ist korrigiert. Ich habe nochmals untersucht wie das geschehen kann. Mit dem IdEditor kann man leicht einen Punkt verschieben und ein benachbarter Punkt packt den. Ich wollte da im Arvenbüel gar nichts ändern, sondern nur was nachschauen. ... commented 2025-08-20 17:42:15 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦21 |
| 170281292 (Comments: 3) | BXBlack (Discussed changesets: 1) | En zoomant bien avec le calque Vue Satellite de Google Maps, on devine la barrière qui entoure le site de l'écluse des fontinettes. Donc impossible de traverser l'AA en empruntant cette écluse. A voir jusqu'ou les ... commented 2025-08-20 17:38:49 UTC by BXBlack ♦1 |
| 170612668 (Comments: 1) | Bagira19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Házszám végére nem szükséges a pont. Köszi, Tamás commented 2025-08-20 17:36:50 UTC by vasony ♦514 |
| 167055726 (Comments: 2) | Reitstoen (Discussed changesets: 1) | I used Strava Heatmap to add these paths. And usually I also try to verify by looking at aerial to see if it's visible there as well. Armchair mapping in this case. At the moment there isn't much Strava Heatmap at way 1391388874, and nei... commented 2025-08-20 17:33:06 UTC by Reitstoen ♦44 |
| 157179024 (Comments: 2) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hallo mcliquid, der Bach war etwas zu lang eingezeichnet. Auf der anderen Seite des Kamms ist eine fluchtende Erosionsrinne. Bach jenseits des Kamms ist gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170739039#map=16/47.33360/10.14267&... commented 2025-08-20 17:24:41 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦21 |
 | 169052401 (Comments: 1) | seav (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hotel commented 2025-08-20 17:21:41 UTC by Abbymaria ♦1 |
| 170713080 (Comments: 3) | gallseife (Discussed changesets: 34) | Danke für das Wiederherstellen. Der wurde Juli 23 eingeweiht, von daher ist es sehr unwahrscheinlich, hätten sie ihn bereits wieder entfernt. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-20 17:11:37 UTC by limes11 ♦913 |
| 170736700 (Comments: 1) | HH23 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag HH Wellicht ook voor moped en mofa? MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 17:10:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 166420491 (Comments: 2) | MarkTobiD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Micha, vielen Dank für die Korrektur. Ich war tatsächlich länger nicht vor Ort, aber bis vor 2024 ging der Wanderweg tatsächlich so entlang. Das war aber nur eine temporäre Behelfs-Umleitung. commented 2025-08-20 17:08:21 UTC by MarkTobiD ♦1 |
| 170737642 (Comments: 2) | demon_box (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ciao ivanbranco, si concordo cambio in note e per il resto a quanto ne so anche "Poren" è l'ennesima storpiatura, i locals mi dicono che si chiama proprio "Monte Porno". Grazie commented 2025-08-20 17:07:58 UTC by demon_box ♦364 |
| 170729443 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | There are two schools here sharing the same landuse area. Please don't tag the name on the overall area. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170729443 commented 2025-08-20 16:58:33 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 170729707 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | Isn't one of these the "High School Academy"? I thought the schools were separate entities... --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170729707 commented 2025-08-20 16:57:25 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 170736160 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hey, friend! Riverfront Park already exists! You may want to undo that change. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9606160 commented 2025-08-20 16:53:47 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 148472716 (Comments: 1) | rabon (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ciao rabon, ti segnalo che "Monte Porno" è la denominazione corretta (anche se può apparire insolita). "Monte Pornio" è soltanto una storpiatura presente su alcune mappe. Non so quante volte ho già... commented 2025-08-20 16:53:02 UTC by demon_box ♦364 |
| 170670885 (Comments: 2) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 142) | Ti chiedo scusa, non avevo visto il disused:amenity, sistemo subito commented 2025-08-20 16:51:09 UTC by damianeue ♦113 |
| 170737163 (Comments: 1) | NittyGrittyInTheCity (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: The source used was MGP Pro 2025.07.27 commented 2025-08-20 16:47:38 UTC by NittyGrittyInTheCity ♦13 |
| 170704813 (Comments: 1) | Sweet Chai (Discussed changesets: 3) | You improved the accuracy of this footprint but it is still inaccurate. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a d... commented 2025-08-20 16:35:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170735843 (Comments: 1) | Stefan Haeder (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin Stefan, kleine Tips, wie deine Arbeit noch besser aussehen kann: - Objekte die in der Realität nahezu rechtwinklig sind können wir auch rechtwinklig machen. Drücke dafür die Taste "Q" nach der Vergabe ... commented 2025-08-20 16:33:40 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 170579432 (Comments: 2) | ptravadactyl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Updated. Was set using Every Door and must have either been off on the imagery. commented 2025-08-20 16:29:53 UTC by ptravadactyl ♦1 |
| 170526627 (Comments: 3) | Evros1969 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ah, danke! Das sind dann quasi Werbetafeln. Dafür sind zum Beispiel diese Tags ganz gut: man_made=advertising advertising=billboard Gebäude sind es jedoch keine. Das müsstest du bitte umändern. commented 2025-08-20 16:24:59 UTC by söm4324 ♦45 |
| 170734543 (Comments: 2) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Charging_station? Meer gebruikelijk als hoofdtag en geeft ook een symbool. Kijk even in de wiki... brand ipv manufacturer ? commented 2025-08-20 16:21:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170479277 (Comments: 5) | HeilWolf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Herzlichen Dank für deine Anmerkungen, denen ich voll und ganz zustimme. Das OSM-Projekt ist inzwischen so groß geworden und hat so viele aktive Mapper, dass jede Weiterentwicklung einen enormen bürokratischen Aufwand hinter sich zieh... commented 2025-08-20 16:07:57 UTC by HeilWolf ♦4 |
| 170057288 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 2) | No i po kiego grzyba przywróciłeś secondary przez Most Staromiejski? Serio uważasz, że przeprawa z ograniczeniem do 8 ton jest istotna z punktu widzenia całego województwa? commented 2025-08-20 16:01:50 UTC by Szymson ♦389 |
| 170682852 (Comments: 2) | LakeHulun (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Thanks for reaching out. I was able to verify that there is a roadway here that supports thru traffic for driving access with the imagery cited. Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which... commented 2025-08-20 15:59:48 UTC by LakeHulun ♦5 |
| 170704452 (Comments: 1) | WoofDriver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please do not removed driveways if they do exist on the ground. Driveways are valid data and removing them in incorrect. Removing valid data is actually considered vandalism. They are not redundant, as you have not replaced the... commented 2025-08-20 15:58:14 UTC by MassCartog ♦139 |
| 170733232 (Comments: 1) | Zolitron (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi :) wenn du das änderst solltest du auch immer auf den obersten access-Wert achten. Den hast du nämlich vergessen zu löschen. Guck es dir vielleicht nochmal an. cheers --- ... commented 2025-08-20 15:56:54 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 170679811 (Comments: 2) | ArinosRiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Enock4seth, In this changeset I aligned roads using Esri World Imagery which is consistent with GPS traces and Strava traces in the area. Would you be able to further clarify what specific issue your seeing with the edits in this changeset?<... commented 2025-08-20 15:56:07 UTC by ArinosRiver ♦1 |
| 170704193 (Comments: 1) | Sweet Chai (Discussed changesets: 3) | You spotted buildings in the imagery but the footprints you've mapped are not as accurate as the imagery allows. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent... commented 2025-08-20 15:52:03 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170728050 (Comments: 1) | salmaelt1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You inadvertently dragged part of a building and a fence on Old Queen Street onto traffic lights on Broad Sanctuary. I've restored them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170733792 commented 2025-08-20 15:37:48 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170684947 (Comments: 1) | PaulNPeterson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Some of the features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it... commented 2025-08-20 15:37:37 UTC by MassCartog ♦139 |
| 170617400 (Comments: 5) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tabiki nasıl isterseniz commented 2025-08-20 15:37:27 UTC by dıscover ♦1 |
| 170730864 (Comments: 1) | DutchJohan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag DutchJohan, Je speeltuin staat al op de kaart als vlak. Ik het de dubbele vermelding verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 15:31:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170730977 (Comments: 1) | sv Parkhout (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback name=Kleedkamers heb ik aangepast naar description=... . MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 170698130 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | You seem aware that snapping the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths is generally not accurate. You deleted one of these footprints which makes the warning go away, but you did not address its root cause (f... commented 2025-08-20 15:26:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170732734 (Comments: 1) | Kormoran Niesulice (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-20 15:21:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170733045 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 521) | Patrz https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uporczywe-zmiany-drog-przypadek-usera-perimex/65355/ i https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/polnocna-obwodnica-milanowka-skad-sie-tu-wziela/130426 commented 2025-08-20 15:20:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170732907 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 521) | Patrz https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uporczywe-zmiany-drog-przypadek-usera-perimex/65355/ i https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/polnocna-obwodnica-milanowka-skad-sie-tu-wziela/130426 commented 2025-08-20 15:17:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170729074 (Comments: 1) | Pere Antoni (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yet another "fake" city added... PLEASE read the wiki about what a "city" is in OSM, thank you: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity especially this part "Use the place=city tag to identify the l... commented 2025-08-20 15:02:17 UTC by acubens71 ♦32 |
| 170697972 (Comments: 3) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | Okay. Personally I request review of changes I am unsure about. Sometimes I upload changes I am not certain about in one changeset/save and add the review requested tag to those. This allows others to filter for those changesets. Please upload... commented 2025-08-20 14:59:03 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170685805 (Comments: 1) | Exterprook58 (Discussed changesets: 7) | The operator is London Overground https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7147509522#map=19/51.648031/-0.052630 commented 2025-08-20 14:58:14 UTC by DaveF ♦1,573 |
| 170635526 (Comments: 5) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-20 14:57:56 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 169569416 (Comments: 1) | tagishsimon (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Simon, I've retagged this as "historic building" because it's not been an actual pub for years, but it historically was one, and the architecture is notable. The White House Kitchen, which currently occupies the building, is ta... commented 2025-08-20 14:52:01 UTC by lottie1040 ♦6 |
| 170717444 (Comments: 1) | Galaxy Movers Calgary (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I noticed you made a succession of changes to this house, to add what I presume is your moving company, based out of your home. With the mix of business and home tags you added, you ended up having effectively deleted the house itself. ... commented 2025-08-20 14:42:10 UTC by hoserab ♦200 |
| 170728122 (Comments: 2) | SalvadorBiedma (Discussed changesets: 3) | P. D. (corrección): Para etiquetar la oficina de una empresa de control de plagas, puede usar «craft=pest_control» u «office=pest_control»: osm.wiki/Tag:shop%3Dpest_control. La clave «shop» se reserva para e... commented 2025-08-20 14:40:21 UTC by dcapillae ♦372 |
| X | 170666958 (Comments: 1) | SL512 (Discussed changesets: 3) | That tree is at zero island! commented 2025-08-20 14:23:05 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,211 |
| 170606502 (Comments: 2) | R0adWarri0r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! There was a "fixme" to check if the transformerstation was still there. It is, but behind a wooden fence. "55254, Dong energy" is the info on the transformerstation, I'm guessing it's the station number. |
| 170438758 (Comments: 1) | Knochen Kotzer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, der gesamte Struck befindet sich bereits in einem Naturschutzgebiet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40950915). Ich denke, es ist daher nicht notwendig, die beiden Flächen (scrub + grassland) extra als nature_reserve zu markieren. commented 2025-08-20 13:58:43 UTC by andyblueg ♦6 |
| 170728393 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170728621 commented 2025-08-20 13:56:37 UTC by TinPetreković ♦110 |
| 170700411 (Comments: 2) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 166) | Todavía no commented 2025-08-20 13:47:21 UTC by AgusQui ♦582 |
| 170667102 (Comments: 1) | flip007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this playground already exists in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8079733 with more detail so I removed the one you added. commented 2025-08-20 13:42:52 UTC by Axel Flordal ♦7 |
| 170619596 (Comments: 1) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merhaba. Sitenin sınırlarını işaretlerken(way/1423050167) building=residential değil, landuse=residential kullanılmalı. commented 2025-08-20 13:36:14 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦67 |
| 170685186 (Comments: 3) | Clitheroe Warrior (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sounds good to me, thanks for checking :) commented 2025-08-20 13:36:11 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 170688895 (Comments: 3) | Martin Ligabue (Discussed changesets: 20) | That's on me, I misjudged which aerial map was used, reverting now, I'll try again later whn I'm on pc commented 2025-08-20 13:24:42 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦27 |
| 170725887 (Comments: 1) | Diş Hekimi Merve Gündüz KANAT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yolu yanlışlıkla mı konumlandırdınız? Hava görüntüsüne göre orada bina var. commented 2025-08-20 13:21:52 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170064542 (Comments: 2) | Penegal (Discussed changesets: 17) | Bonjour. Ah, tiens ? Erreur de ma part ; je pensais avoir remis les membres dans le bon ordre… Merci pour la correction ! commented 2025-08-20 13:17:57 UTC by Penegal ♦26 |
| 170691662 (Comments: 1) | Belisarius33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lütfen isimlendirme yaparken kısaltma kullanmayın. Teşekkürler. commented 2025-08-20 13:10:57 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170711271 (Comments: 1) | interaktivist (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wieso löschen? Was ist mit den Daten für den Nachfolger, "Shambala" - Yoga. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/718495466#map=19/51.434582/7.010250&layers=N commented 2025-08-20 13:01:26 UTC by vogelfreier ♦92 |
| 167571777 (Comments: 2) | MrLusignana (Discussed changesets: 8) | Grazie per avermi segnalato l'errore. Devo aver spostato il monumento per sbaglio quando ho modificato la strada/il sentiero adiacente. Mi scuso! Ho corretto la posizione. commented 2025-08-20 12:59:33 UTC by MrLusignana ♦7 |
| 170638605 (Comments: 1) | Battall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, il sınırlarına ilişkin veriye nereden ulaştınız? commented 2025-08-20 12:53:12 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170719184 (Comments: 2) | Oscar Nagel (Discussed changesets: 1) | added playground =seesaw commented 2025-08-20 12:50:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170669643 (Comments: 2) | MoistTangerine2 (Discussed changesets: 11) | "Landuse", not "building". commented 2025-08-20 12:47:44 UTC by MoistTangerine2 ♦15 |
| 170265007 (Comments: 3) | ChrisFromRV (Discussed changesets: 136) | Ich hab dieses Changeset revertiert, da sich ChrisFromRV nicht mehr dazu geäußert hat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170724455 commented 2025-08-20 12:43:19 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170599877 (Comments: 4) | mustwinelite (Discussed changesets: 2) | amend, paragraph 1 >> The following are facts, i have been blocked by you, and so has mustwinelite << commented 2025-08-20 12:41:42 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170720166 (Comments: 2) | Piotr Strębski (Discussed changesets: 181) | poprawione commented 2025-08-20 12:36:03 UTC by Piotr Strębski ♦179 |
| 170570557 (Comments: 1) | Alp Utku (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hava görüntüsünde 3 adet ayrı ev gözükmekte. Binalar yıkılıp yerine farklı bir bina mı yapıldı? Neden birleştirerek yeni bir bina oluşturdunuz? commented 2025-08-20 12:23:49 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170570210 (Comments: 1) | Alp Utku (Discussed changesets: 3) | Parkı silmek yerine yeniden konulmadırabilirsiniz. Hem böylece elementin geçmişini de korumuş olursunuz. Ayrıca lütfen açıklamayı doğru yapın. Teşekkürler. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_his... commented 2025-08-20 12:20:36 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦100 |
| 170672672 (Comments: 1) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ser bra ut, denne har fått både mtb:scale og class:bicycle:mtb slik jeg tror du ønsket. commented 2025-08-20 12:13:47 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 170722515 (Comments: 1) | RicoElectrico (Discussed changesets: 43) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345034680 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-08-20 12:13:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170672392 (Comments: 1) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ser at du har lagt inn class:bicycle:mtb = 0 class:bicycle:mtb:1 = 1 men den siste av disse vil ikke fungere (class:bicycle:mtb:1 er ikke en godkjent "tag"), og den førstnevnte vil i praksis heller ikke gjøre noe siden 0... commented 2025-08-20 12:12:45 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 170644109 (Comments: 2) | Jeff Ferrari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks buy_osmand. I might add: I made this edit due to the very high number of Lyft riders misrouting going to Marquis at Treetops… trying to help reduce driver frustration :) commented 2025-08-20 12:07:05 UTC by Jeff Ferrari ♦1 |
| 170615671 (Comments: 3) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Eklediğiniz otellerin faal olduğunu belirtmek için tourism=hotel etiketleri eklemeniz gerek. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=hotel commented 2025-08-20 12:05:57 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦67 |
| 170568316 (Comments: 2) | Hedaja (Discussed changesets: 32) | Thanks for noticing. Seems like I accidentally copied something. Fixed commented 2025-08-20 12:04:09 UTC by Hedaja ♦136 |
| 170720630 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 29) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395529318 |
| 158152736 (Comments: 1) | adrian87bp (Discussed changesets: 1) | El ayuntamiento es addr:city=Trescasas commented 2025-08-20 11:53:39 UTC by Arturo Francisco Barbero ♦51 |
| 166730858 (Comments: 4) | mountainscaper (Discussed changesets: 1) | In privato gli ho scritto 1 mese fa e ha totalmente ignorato, anche se ha continuato a pubblicare modifiche in altri sentieri. Per il revert mi stavo informando, sarebbe da fare con JOSM da quello che ho capito commented 2025-08-20 11:46:59 UTC by Davide Cozzi ♦1 |
| 170563971 (Comments: 1) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merhaba. Bitişik blokları tek bina olarak çizdiğiniz bir notta belirtildiği için şu binayı sildiğinizi söylemişsiniz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545915000 Binayı geri aldım. Bitişik bloklar, tek bina şekli... commented 2025-08-20 11:41:19 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦67 |
| 170583515 (Comments: 2) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Şu park yolunu neden sildiniz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206127544 commented 2025-08-20 11:40:15 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦67 |
| 158807385 (Comments: 2) | gaugau7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I will go check it next week, but I'm pretty sure there is a " private path " label on the trees at the southern entry of the path I'll keep updated commented 2025-08-20 11:39:55 UTC by gaugau7 ♦2 |
| 170577264 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170720353 commented 2025-08-20 11:29:23 UTC by IvaLedinščak ♦32 |
| 170378415 (Comments: 5) | fmc_9 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Der ist durch einen teils 2 Meter breiten Grünstreifen mit Bäumen und kleinen Büschen bau(m)lich getrennt, kann also extra erfasst werden. Natürlich inklusive der Baumreihe, Grünstreifens und der diversen Durchgänge. commented 2025-08-20 11:25:25 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 131172755 (Comments: 1) | ItsDurian (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Bandar Serenia shouldn't be ref=10 I think commented 2025-08-20 11:24:38 UTC by angys ♦378 |
| 170715554 (Comments: 1) | CielMC (Discussed changesets: 1) | The software's label is misleading, and they are unnecessary. But this is unnecessary. The buildings are simply numbered blocks. We are mostly using `addr:housename=` for the estate/facility name, to handle separately from the buildings. commented 2025-08-20 11:24:32 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,583 |
| 170715730 (Comments: 8) | TozzaEU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahh... Onze berichten kruisten elkaar.. Ik denk dat het nu goed is.. ook gezien je aanwijzingen. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 11:21:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170609888 (Comments: 2) | Takaoshi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dobra, już odwróciłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170719310 commented 2025-08-20 11:10:47 UTC by SzymonH ♦210 |
| 170719024 (Comments: 1) | ZekOwney (Discussed changesets: 13) | Correction : Ajout STEP Lonrai, Ajout STEP inconnue de SANDRE (liée à la prison ?) commented 2025-08-20 11:10:33 UTC by ZekOwney ♦17 |
| 170719158 (Comments: 1) | rokas_osm (Discussed changesets: 14) | This might need to be remapped as soon as the modernisation construction work is finished : https://www.bls.ch/de/unternehmen/projekte-und-hintergruende/bauprojekte/bahnhof-zell commented 2025-08-20 11:08:55 UTC by rokas_osm ♦8 |
| 169507345 (Comments: 1) | S1eK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Kennst Du Dich da aus? (ich nicht!) Dürfen hier wieder Autos fahren? Wenn ja dann sollte man auch das access=no löschen. Solange das da steht darf da eigentlich auch kein Fußgänger durch! Keine KFZ wäre motor_v... commented 2025-08-20 10:58:47 UTC by Senihtu ♦84 |
| 166496956 (Comments: 3) | geomaniX (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170718420 commented 2025-08-20 10:55:41 UTC by geomaniX ♦42 |
| 170702657 (Comments: 15) | Martijn1980 (Discussed changesets: 2) | OSM houdt je in ieder geval niet van de straat :) commented 2025-08-20 10:54:32 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170574798 (Comments: 1) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Eklediğiniz internet sitesindeki adres sorguladığında Dağ Holding'in sokağın diğer tarafında olduğu görünüyor. Yanlış yere eklenmiş. commented 2025-08-20 10:40:36 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦67 |
| 170673874 (Comments: 3) | Kieshiuz (Discussed changesets: 1) | A, matau, yra tie „gumbeliai“. Na tada gal ir gerai :-) Sėkmės commented 2025-08-20 10:28:21 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,970 |
| 170573957 (Comments: 3) | jmaspons (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ho he repassat tot i he corregit els errors a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170716173 Moltes gràcies per avisar! commented 2025-08-20 10:10:48 UTC by jmaspons ♦64 |
 | 170430680 (Comments: 1) | Becky Candy (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, the tag "healthcare:psychotherapist" doesn't exist. It's either healthcare=psychotherapist, or "health_specialty:psychotherapy" commented 2025-08-20 09:48:54 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 127655937 (Comments: 6) | mxkllnr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bitte um einen Nachweis (vor Ort Besichtigung oder ähnliches) für die Löschung. Hier die Faktenlage aus dem Bebauungsplan des Landkreises die zeigt, dass dieser Pfad sich in einer Waldfläche befindet für das eben keine Erlaub... commented 2025-08-20 09:47:36 UTC by mxkllnr ♦1 |
| 170712050 (Comments: 2) | MMFSoftwares (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Hinweis! In dem Änderungssatz hatte ich leider noch einen Knoten aus dem Kroatien-Urlaub drin. Das ist mir in der Map2Go-App nicht aufgefallen. commented 2025-08-20 09:46:07 UTC by MMFSoftwares ♦1 |
| 166378113 (Comments: 1) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Usunąłem nazwę opisową parkingu i zastąpiłem tagiem access. commented 2025-08-20 09:30:08 UTC by uprkos ♦49 |
| 166377897 (Comments: 2) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Usunąłem nazwy opisowe. commented 2025-08-20 09:25:21 UTC by uprkos ♦49 |
| 170596649 (Comments: 4) | Pan_Nug (Discussed changesets: 5) | Noted, thanks for your input. commented 2025-08-20 09:25:18 UTC by Pan_Nug ♦6 |
| 138160811 (Comments: 1) | Aury88 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ciao Aury88, ma queste way sono davvero drive-through? "un tipo di servizio da asporto fornito da un'azienda che consente ai clienti di acquistare prodotti senza lasciare l'auto" commented 2025-08-20 09:11:43 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,769 |
| 168746431 (Comments: 2) | Fifco1 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ďakujem za opravu. commented 2025-08-20 09:10:22 UTC by Fifco1 ♦16 |
| 154944886 (Comments: 1) | Cristian1989 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Cristian, non sono esperto di power mapping e sono curioso, come mai hai cambiato da power=line a power=minor_line? Leggo nella wiki: "Very high-voltage lines at more than 150 kV, or which form part of a [W] transmission ... commented 2025-08-20 09:09:14 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,769 |
| 170602245 (Comments: 2) | Pascal1909 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo Metzor. Guter Punkt, vielen Dank für deine Hinweise & Unterstützung! Grüße aus Rt Pascal commented 2025-08-20 09:05:30 UTC by Pascal1909 ♦8 |
| 170712110 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 29) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423511878<... commented 2025-08-20 09:01:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170690598 (Comments: 3) | Allytat2504 (Discussed changesets: 1) | For cropland, allowing for the margins is probably the right approach if they’re big margins, or if they contain vastly different things from what’s in the field (like trees or scrub). I’m used to mapping mostly sheep pasture, where... commented 2025-08-20 08:55:01 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 170706820 (Comments: 1) | edgard_m (Discussed changesets: 3) | Du skal benytte loc_name:en=Simons Lake for den engelske version af loc_name. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=da#Local_names_(loc_name) Hvor har du navnet fra? commented 2025-08-20 08:43:02 UTC by b-holdet ♦325 |
| 170670103 (Comments: 4) | DurainABC (Discussed changesets: 2) | D'accord, je comprends mieux. Merci pour les explications ! commented 2025-08-20 08:40:45 UTC by DurainABC ♦2 |
| 162312543 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 224) | Correct aangepast thx commented 2025-08-20 08:40:21 UTC by Jakka ♦1,821 |
| 170547042 (Comments: 1) | Rif-Q (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13075272866. What is the mean of the tag n = audy kids? Please notice the difference between a name and a description. A name only object is use less. If you need more information (and c... commented 2025-08-20 08:31:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170709216 (Comments: 1) | edgard_m (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej, du skriver at du angiver lokale navne. Vil du i så fald være så venlig at bruge tagget 'loc_name=*' på søerne. commented 2025-08-20 08:25:01 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,671 |
| 170687050 (Comments: 1) | Im Fokus (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ja ihr habt recht ... es war spät und ne lange Fahrt ... man kann/darf hier natürlich nicht nach Nordwesten abbiegen ... commented 2025-08-20 08:19:19 UTC by Ana Luisa ♦24 |
| 170707066 (Comments: 1) | Bene83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Bene83, willkommen bei OSM :) Bist du sicher, dass diese Grundstücksauffahrt einen gewidmeten Straßennamen hat? Du hast leider keine Quelle angegeben, deswegen kann ich nicht erkennen, woher die Info stammt. Viele Gr... commented 2025-08-20 08:03:25 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170677155 (Comments: 1) | coucaal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for refining this! Just FYI, in changest #170708973 https://osmcha.org/changesets/170708973 I fixed and refined the geometry and end tagging of the footways leading to the tennis courts to be more precise and consistent, and also added access ... commented 2025-08-20 07:58:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦40 |
| 170680116 (Comments: 1) | DurainABC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité de l'un (et probablement deux) itinéraire(s), en ne remettant pas les membres dans l'ordre. Il semble que Vespucci soit moins performant que JOSM ou iD sur l'ordre... commented 2025-08-20 07:57:21 UTC by StC ♦310 |
| 170697669 (Comments: 1) | Edit on the fly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Edit on the fly, danke für Deine Beiträge, aber bist Du dir sicher, dass es auf dem Parkareal "Weg: 69563667" 11 ausgewiesene Behindertenparplätze (capacity:disabled) gibt? VG pitfire commented 2025-08-20 07:41:26 UTC by pitfire ♦670 |
| 170707956 (Comments: 1) | Gleb_Artyomenko (Discussed changesets: 29) | clarification road geometry was fixed based, road name was added on Esri World Imagery #mapbox_linters commented 2025-08-20 07:29:10 UTC by Gleb_Artyomenko ♦29 |
| 170613305 (Comments: 1) | Bratkó József (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! I searched the key statistics (taginfo.osm.org) and the wiki (wiki.osm.org) and found no reference to assistance dogs. This does not surprise me, as such dogs are legally allowed in areas where dogs are otherwise prohibited. Nevertheless, I th... commented 2025-08-20 07:26:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170692336 (Comments: 1) | 7beren (Discussed changesets: 5) | 7beren, Hier mis ik nog een highway=crossing MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 07:24:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170692574 (Comments: 1) | 7beren (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag 7beren... Lijkt me oke zo. Groet eggie commented 2025-08-20 07:22:57 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170702505 (Comments: 2) | Martijn1980 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het wegdeel dat uit het lood lag bij de brug het ik teruggelegd. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170702505 commented 2025-08-20 07:20:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170691340 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:20:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170691271 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:56 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170691285 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:50 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170691222 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170690789 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170690618 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170688643 (Comments: 3) | CmdrPluisNL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Knooppunt 78 gesorteerd commented 2025-08-20 07:17:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170575658 (Comments: 4) | Atypique (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci en fait j'étais sur l'application organic-map et pas sur le sit de osm. Mais c'est bon j'ai modifié le Siret. Bonne journée commented 2025-08-20 07:15:34 UTC by Atypique ♦1 |
| 170664343 (Comments: 2) | sayido (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170707134 commented 2025-08-20 07:13:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170649513 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please don't remove non-"standard" names. Change them to other `*_name=` to show that. commented 2025-08-20 07:10:30 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,583 |
| 170578859 (Comments: 5) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 57) | Dat was een lange discussie en er greep er al één bij naar popcorn Frederik Ramm heeft mijns inziens het meest gelijk met, kort gezegd: Map what is on the ground. Ik las ook: dat het soms geaccepteerd wordt als het nog verband houd met ... commented 2025-08-20 07:10:20 UTC by Op'tRad ♦45 |
| 163499002 (Comments: 1) | Billy78945 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, See this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions It seems your are using the nametag for the description! We don't use name=highway for every highway or name=river for every river don't we?<... commented 2025-08-20 07:03:27 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 158842967 (Comments: 1) | Thurgau Tourismus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Kiesstrand war schon hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275509194 Ich habe die beiden Dinge zusammengeführt, und wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4919445 den Namen entfernt. commented 2025-08-20 06:52:31 UTC by habi ♦1,869 |
| 156985992 (Comments: 2) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hallo Marc, Ik ben dat stukje vergeten en herinner me niet meer waar het om ging, maar ik zal er nog eens naar kijken. Ik vermoed dat het was omdat ik constateerde dat de grintbakken op het Circuit Zandvoort als zand (natural sand?) gemapt stonden... commented 2025-08-20 06:46:48 UTC by Op'tRad ♦45 |
| 170690356 (Comments: 1) | vasmap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Bei Kindergärten, Schulen, Feuerwachen etc. kommen die Daten in der Regel an das Gelände und nicht an das Gebäude. In deinem Beispiel heißt das: a... commented 2025-08-20 06:32:41 UTC by rempshaener ♦828 |
| 170701782 (Comments: 2) | shax13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thank you for the comment. I am just getting started with mapping. Will look into it. :) commented 2025-08-20 06:13:27 UTC by shax13 ♦1 |
| 170449894 (Comments: 2) | onomatopoeia (Discussed changesets: 2) | To citrula, with your experience, please do indicate in writing, which will be the appropriate variant if `name` is unaccepted by local community https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Variants ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْك... commented 2025-08-20 06:09:30 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170687643 (Comments: 1) | BubaNL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-20 05:51:56 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170689765 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 94) | Is there a reason for you to make so much multipolygons? BTW someone else uploaded the buildings right before you, some of them are duplicated. commented 2025-08-20 05:27:02 UTC by Lejun ♦490 |
| 170701947 (Comments: 1) | Raven Scales (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the two buildings addressed relations should be redone as simple polygons with out the join commented 2025-08-20 05:18:51 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170701956 (Comments: 1) | Leo984567 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, there are two buildings at 316 and both are addressed as unit 1. I expect that one should be unit 2 commented 2025-08-20 05:03:17 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 169814461 (Comments: 3) | bluegibberish (Discussed changesets: 4) | Не люблю такую последовательность слов, но ладно. commented 2025-08-20 04:49:41 UTC by Grass-snake ♦236 |
| 170697618 (Comments: 1) | Elia Stellios (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this polygon appears to only cover part of the building footprint. commented 2025-08-20 04:45:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170685513 (Comments: 5) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wellicht is footway hier beter? Up to you. commented 2025-08-20 04:41:03 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170682748 (Comments: 3) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hoi.. Je zou eens naar editor josm kunnen kijken. Veel meer overzicht en een goede foutenanalyse. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-20 04:35:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170701452 (Comments: 1) | jake-low (Discussed changesets: 5) | Changeset comment got cut off. Was supposed to say: South San Francisco, CA: categorize footways around El Camino High School as either sidewalk or crossing commented 2025-08-20 04:35:12 UTC by jake-low ♦12 |
| 170697542 (Comments: 1) | JARRODLUCAS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, could you check if https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419093565#map=19/-37.875809/145.133717 should be moved to the right where there is a building with no address. I think this node might have been accidentally shifted. commented 2025-08-20 04:30:39 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170644162 (Comments: 1) | jtbaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | I, buy_osmand, has read the wiki and stand by jtbaker on his actions taken for the improvement of his local community. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Common_values AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕ ... commented 2025-08-20 04:12:50 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170699123 (Comments: 1) | AbnerR33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are inaccurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like ... commented 2025-08-20 03:29:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170698171 (Comments: 1) | Miguel Angel L (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in the imagery but generally mapped their footprints oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues l... commented 2025-08-20 03:12:35 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170698198 (Comments: 1) | Lizette Llamas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! The footprint shape looks appropriately unsquared. Please report the source(s) you used for the information you tagged on this footprint. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source Please keep this feedback in mind... commented 2025-08-20 03:07:47 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170698202 (Comments: 1) | dpcastrob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You've spotted buildings and constructions here ,but many are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like dat... commented 2025-08-20 03:01:21 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170698206 (Comments: 1) | AHvazquez (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Many of the footprints yo added here envelope multiple buildings. Each building should be mapped with its own footprint. Use plots, shadows, and colours to discriminate between adjacent buildings. Please keep this feed... commented 2025-08-20 02:41:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170698218 (Comments: 1) | Miguel Angel L (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! I think you enveloped 2 buildings using 1 footprint here. Each building should be represented by one footprint. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimat... commented 2025-08-20 02:38:06 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170698235 (Comments: 1) | AHvazquez (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You identified buildings in imagery and ingeneral appropriately squared them however the imagery allows for them to be more accurate as they are generally oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accuratel... commented 2025-08-20 02:34:47 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170697901 (Comments: 2) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | will consider ur observations for future mapping:) commented 2025-08-20 02:28:10 UTC by Johnatan Reyes ♦2 |
| 170697732 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | Why did you position the footprint in this way? Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https:... commented 2025-08-20 02:17:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170697671 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | A valid footprint. It could be a touch smaller; roofs tend to overhang walls. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can f... commented 2025-08-20 02:06:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170697653 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | Looks like you included some of the building's shadow in its footprint resulting in it being slightly oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and pr... commented 2025-08-20 02:03:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170681749 (Comments: 1) | r37 (Discussed changesets: 2) | A big thank you for the ground_survey❗❕ with this, other cyclists would be able to plan their routes prior and have a very smooth ride, rather than needing to find a detour mid way 😄😁 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-08-20 02:03:29 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170697663 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | A valid and accurate building footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/ |
| 170696721 (Comments: 1) | FerPapaqui (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. You generally correctly identified buildings in imagery, but they are ever so slightly oversized. I noticed you looked at various imageries, when a building appears the same on two imagery sources you can trace it using the higher res... commented 2025-08-20 01:58:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170696958 (Comments: 1) | pastelin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. You created overlapping footprints here becasue the orientation of the one I flagged is inaccurate. Zooming in and out can aid interpretation of shape and orientation. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Tha... commented 2025-08-20 01:46:38 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170592825 (Comments: 3) | taki3hira (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for the easy-to-understand video. I'll use it as reference for future mapping. commented 2025-08-20 01:30:09 UTC by taki3hira ♦15 |
| 170695946 (Comments: 1) | waggii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Overall the building footpritns you added are accurate, however the one I flagged actually envelopes 2 buildings. The landuse you tagged as farmland would more accurately be tagged as orchard. The track you added looka like it may not be a highway, b... commented 2025-08-20 01:10:24 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170661845 (Comments: 2) | Sparnonien (Discussed changesets: 7) | bonjour . je l'ai supprimé merci commented 2025-08-20 01:03:01 UTC by Sparnonien ♦5 |
| 167519410 (Comments: 1) | Bzyzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, Bzyzz. Thank you for your contributions! I saw that the node for the Prince Rupert train station might have accidentally been dragged a couple hundred meters into a residential area. I went ahead and undid that here: https://www.ope... commented 2025-08-20 01:02:58 UTC by clay_c ♦516 |
| 170061501 (Comments: 1) | StijnDP (Discussed changesets: 4) | ik ben wat hesitant om footpath te gebruiken omdat er vaak geen fysiek 'voetpad' bord aanwezig is. Path is generiek en laat fietsers ook toe. commented 2025-08-20 01:02:24 UTC by kabelhaai ♦40 |
| 170692894 (Comments: 3) | descilla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nur zur Info: Die kann man in JOSM mit dem Preset "Pferdesport" taggen (den man leider mit der Suchfunktion nicht findet wenn man nach "reit" sucht). commented 2025-08-20 00:52:00 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦783 |
| 170695954 (Comments: 2) | Sweet Chai (Discussed changesets: 3) | See my resolution in https://osmcha.org/changesets/170696301 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170695954 commented 2025-08-20 00:45:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 170695959 (Comments: 1) | Shaylim Miranda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. You correctly identified a building in the imagery, but mapped its footprint inaccurately becasue you did not account for the fact that a part of its roof is obscured by vegetation. See how I mapped it here https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2025-08-20 00:37:53 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 155044266 (Comments: 1) | sourcemaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi sourcemaster, ESRI's address database has this house numbered 2702, and the other houses on this side of the street have even numbers. Are you sure this house number should be 2701? I will be over here in a few days to survey ho... commented 2025-08-20 00:24:43 UTC by FeetAndInches ♦10 |
| 170645107 (Comments: 1) | pipigong (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The school does not only occupy the buildings but also the grounds. The school boundary can be found in the DCS Base Map. I have made the change. commented 2025-08-20 00:16:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,670 |
| 170506011 (Comments: 13) | buy_osmand (Discussed changesets: 53) | Correct, you have made your decline to the invitation publicly known. Good day. I'm just minding my own business to earn my 11oz of silver ☺ https://ministryofhealth.substack.com/p/43-the-currency-of-the-redeemed-living commented 2025-08-20 00:16:05 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170645673 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Cheers for pointing this out to me. I will fix this and other relations with this issue. Thanks again, Lachlan commented 2025-08-20 00:12:48 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦22 |
| 170602448 (Comments: 1) | GmTax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert SEO edits added to whole building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695564 commented 2025-08-19 23:59:46 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170602109 (Comments: 1) | GmTax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert SEO edits added to whole building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695564 commented 2025-08-19 23:59:46 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170601505 (Comments: 1) | GmTax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert SEO edits added to whole building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695564 commented 2025-08-19 23:59:45 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170543079 (Comments: 2) | ramoncap (Discussed changesets: 1) | I’ve made my suggested changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695530. Please say if you think they’re not correct, thanks commented 2025-08-19 23:58:21 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 170688949 (Comments: 1) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 199) | Trees are highly advanced technology❕🌳May you encounter a giant tree , of multiple stories high to be in awe❕❕ --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1706... commented 2025-08-19 23:52:41 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170679875 (Comments: 2) | seoboost (Discussed changesets: 3) | correction... the max and min age tags are correct commented 2025-08-19 23:17:06 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 170586893 (Comments: 2) | Skeed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah check! Ja zolang deze plek te vinden is voor anderen vind ik het allemaal best! Thanks :)! commented 2025-08-19 22:53:32 UTC by Skeed ♦2 |
| 154562996 (Comments: 1) | 8err (Discussed changesets: 8) | Prosim piste lepsie popisy sad zmien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-08-19 22:50:33 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170693552 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 269) | Poprawione, pomyłka ze strony budynków commented 2025-08-19 22:47:27 UTC by syntex ♦872 |
| 168430358 (Comments: 1) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Błędne, opisowe name. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168430358 commented 2025-08-19 22:37:53 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦513 |
| 158080398 (Comments: 5) | Jožo Schwarz (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ja verim, ze to uz coskoro oznacia ako cyklocestu, rozporujem len jej oznacenie ako cyklocestu 10 mesiacov dopredu :) Ano, ak uz je cesta schodna pre chodcov, nevidim problem v jej docasnom oznaceni ako highway=footway a ponechani znacky const... commented 2025-08-19 22:27:38 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170677130 (Comments: 1) | seoboost (Discussed changesets: 3) | You have duplicated the same number under phone and mobile commented 2025-08-19 22:19:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 154412820 (Comments: 5) | mars412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ach, die uralten Schätzchen aus den 80'ern 💡 Da die völlig überholt sind und sich von den neuen Wander-Wegweisern deutlich unterscheiden, kannst du solche auf abandoned=yes setzen. Wenn sie so dennoch weiter in OSM-Wa... commented 2025-08-19 22:16:10 UTC by DeFra85 ♦239 |
 | 159364284 (Comments: 1) | Armand_Rose (Discussed changesets: 6) | Slip roads/ramps are usually considered to "belong" to the through highway they exit and enter - that being the M1 in this case, which is classified as Trunk. commented 2025-08-19 22:15:28 UTC by Himké ♦72 |
| 170693371 (Comments: 1) | seoboost (Discussed changesets: 3) | You have duplicated the phone number with the same number under phone= and mobile= Looks like a phone number. commented 2025-08-19 22:14:39 UTC by nevw ♦2,012 |
| 166160854 (Comments: 1) | Matthew Hostak (Discussed changesets: 33) | Zdravim, ten nazov Manta Ray je tam naozaj po anglicky? commented 2025-08-19 22:12:34 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170458856 (Comments: 1) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 37) | Tu nie ma bramy. Skad ją wziales, przytargales na plecach ? commented 2025-08-19 22:03:30 UTC by David_Serum ♦3 |
| X | 170668811 (Comments: 2) | flatmoll (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thanks for pointing that out! I made these changes within a short period, but in different times, and for some reason the app I use stacked them together. Next time I'll sure use the OSM website to make changes in different regions. commented 2025-08-19 21:58:39 UTC by flatmoll ♦2 |
| 170006242 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 34) | What's the source of this name? I cannot find anything on the Internet with that name. commented 2025-08-19 21:57:26 UTC by SpinOff ♦298 |
| 167405598 (Comments: 3) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Je vela typov spomalovacov, treba si to pozriet na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming . Treba to rozlisovat, lebo nie vsetky spomaluju vsetky typy vozidiel. Napr. cushion nebrzi autobus (vozidla so sirokym rozchodom), ale auta an... commented 2025-08-19 21:52:23 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 169722154 (Comments: 5) | Bilykralik16 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Chapem ten pracovny nazov. Preto som to nedal do old_name, kedze sa to tak nikdy nevolalo. proposed:name bol docasny pokus, ale to plati pre buducnost, nie minulost. Zmenil som na was:name. Aka je lepsia znacka pre "pracovny nazov"? ... commented 2025-08-19 21:48:37 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 161435596 (Comments: 3) | GJCity (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for the quick response. It looks like the plugin I was using assumed the curb was a blocking barrier which caused the "issue". That was my mistake for not noticing that. The interns tagging scheme is a little odd so if you&... commented 2025-08-19 21:46:41 UTC by Baconcrisp ♦136 |
| 170086029 (Comments: 1) | Radosław Drożdżewski (Discussed changesets: 4) | Jak powstanie, to wtedy zmapujemy. Na razie usunąłem commented 2025-08-19 21:40:46 UTC by SpinOff ♦298 |
| 170516472 (Comments: 1) | BoxingArcher163 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Highway class and highway surface are different things. The line with highway=residential was correct, because it is used to reach the 93C building. I corrected it. commented 2025-08-19 21:23:24 UTC by SpinOff ♦298 |
| 170357437 (Comments: 6) | atticquilt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for your caretaking of the map and thoughtful guidance to our volunteers who are contributing their time and local knowledge to try to improve map data in their communities. We’re reviewing the items you suggested and appreciate the feed... commented 2025-08-19 21:19:28 UTC by atticquilt ♦3 |
| 170631026 (Comments: 1) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 151) | Closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4881922 commented 2025-08-19 21:07:36 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦176 |
| 170690935 (Comments: 3) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Oke.. dat is gelukt met building=office Die andere office=... hoort op de node bij de instelling. Office=government geeft ook een symbool. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-19 20:59:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170676822 (Comments: 4) | PW1996 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem.. Het komt omdat je met de linkermuis selecteert..maar ook schuift met de kaart. Na selectie..onbewust.. schuift niet de kaart maar de node. Mapse.. eggie commented 2025-08-19 20:52:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170691067 (Comments: 1) | Kazik [PL] (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-19 20:51:36 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170635350 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | poprawione commented 2025-08-19 20:25:48 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170688276 (Comments: 1) | Soarex (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Soarex.. Ik heb er weer een highway=path van gemaakt conform de voorgaande tagging. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-19 20:24:20 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170688290 (Comments: 1) | Sans123456789 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je plakt gewoon een rugdeel op een bestaande weg. Dat is niet correct. Ik heb de weg gesplitst op twee plaatsen en daar een brug van gemaakt. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-19 20:22:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170685180 (Comments: 2) | christophenglert (Discussed changesets: 24) | ja, in der Menüauswahl war im Textfeld schon 3-5 eingetragen, daher dachte ich: oh Vorauswahl ist immer gut, das nehm ich! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170685180 ... commented 2025-08-19 20:02:09 UTC by christophenglert ♦8 |
| 165339966 (Comments: 3) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 149) | Hallo Jeroen, Nu zie ik, dat de wijziging in Sint Jansstraat idd ouder en niet van jou is. Ik zal veranderen in de 'echte' naam Provinciale Weg. HG, Jan. commented 2025-08-19 19:31:10 UTC by janhals ♦12 |
| 159318300 (Comments: 4) | spaanse (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bedankt voor de terugkoppeling, dan ga ik eruit halen. commented 2025-08-19 19:12:50 UTC by dikkeknodel ♦286 |
| 170632320 (Comments: 1) | Juan TuTree (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your contribution. What's the source you used to locate these ALPRs? Please be careful to not attach the ALPRs to other features like sidewalks and roads - I fixed a couple of these for you. commented 2025-08-19 19:04:00 UTC by citrula ♦897 |
| 170600063 (Comments: 4) | fbausch (Discussed changesets: 15) | Die 62 war ja doppelt da ich sie paar Tage im Vorraus eingepflegt habe, den der Beginn der Umstrukturierung war ja erst am Montag. Deshalb wollte ich das überschneiden. commented 2025-08-19 19:03:27 UTC by Daniel22Ka ♦17 |
| 162775347 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 162) | Hello Claudius, I am really a little bit shocked about this: "Opened 2021" and "Check 2023" for a subway line, which is now (August 2025) completed by little over 50 %! I am going to update this in a few moments. Regards,... commented 2025-08-19 19:02:00 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦29 |
| 166026559 (Comments: 1) | EZMVD6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour ces améliorations. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625876134/history c'est voulu d'avoir dis que le cheminement piéton est sous le pont et non pas sur le pont ? car ce noeud est incohér... commented 2025-08-19 19:01:11 UTC by Marc_ch ♦281 |
| 170664657 (Comments: 2) | sayido (Discussed changesets: 2) | Done with https://www.osm.org/changeset/170687683 commented 2025-08-19 18:59:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170681310 (Comments: 1) | Woody365 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Dag Woody, Editor iD is niet echt geschikt om iets met routerelaties te doen. Inleggen lukt soms nog wel, maar bewerken gaat niet met editor iD . Hier lopen ook andere routerelaties en grote kans dat die 'stuk'gaan. Wanneer je... commented 2025-08-19 18:47:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170685066 (Comments: 1) | dkl184 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-19 18:41:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 72501477 (Comments: 2) | matchman (Discussed changesets: 20) | After 3 year of silence I changed it to natural=scrub commented 2025-08-19 18:37:56 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170661407 (Comments: 2) | noenoenoe123 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Par contre je ne sais pas ce que signifie exactement brand:wikidata et brand. Je te laisse finaliser la modification, je ne voudrais pas mettre n'importe quoi ! commented 2025-08-19 18:37:39 UTC by noenoenoe123 ♦3 |
| 170503400 (Comments: 3) | papizhulo (Discussed changesets: 1) | merci beaucoup :-) commented 2025-08-19 18:33:17 UTC by Patchanka ♦390 |
| 170671664 (Comments: 3) | Empybean (Discussed changesets: 1) | Na atsargiai su tuo rusišku softu :-) Zverikas jau dešimt metų crappina. commented 2025-08-19 18:29:16 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,970 |
| 170647032 (Comments: 5) | Alex Stephen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good to know, thanks @Glassman. commented 2025-08-19 18:27:38 UTC by pwbriggs ♦57 |
| 160696717 (Comments: 1) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hallo Makeena There is this discussion on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mb-downhillstrecken-als-highway-cycleway-getaggt/134276 After reading it I checked how Downhill-Tracks are mapped in Zürich. So I found out, that... commented 2025-08-19 18:20:11 UTC by nurdafur ♦228 |
| 170671036 (Comments: 1) | Qotola (Discussed changesets: 8) | reverted - everything was mapped precisely as it is, there's a gap in the pavement line and a part closer to the house https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170685783 commented 2025-08-19 18:17:54 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170637164 (Comments: 4) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | Poza tym routing nieogarniający multipolygonów to też problem, ale to w przypadku mojej innej zmiany chyba z tagiem access=yes. commented 2025-08-19 18:17:35 UTC by driedfish ♦3 |
| 170576097 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 862) | Bonjour, Désolé pour le boulot inutile sur ce changeset. Je vais faire des contrôles plus rigoureux à l'avenir. commented 2025-08-19 18:14:13 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦92 |
| 170676800 (Comments: 1) | Ticecream (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 18:12:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170676502 (Comments: 1) | PW1996 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 18:09:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170671166 (Comments: 1) | jwm2008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | motor_vehicle=no is for cases where cars are not allowed at all - does not seem to be the case here. I added smoothness=bad tag to try to help with your routing case. You might also have better luck adding an entrance node to the location you are try... commented 2025-08-19 18:05:45 UTC by citrula ♦897 |
| 169971392 (Comments: 1) | NIWE1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi NIWE1, the leisure=park tag is used for recreational parks, not car parking lots (amenity=parking). Since the parking lots were already mapped, I've removed the park areas you added. commented 2025-08-19 17:55:08 UTC by lmum ♦30 |
| 170638056 (Comments: 1) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | W jakim celu? commented 2025-08-19 17:54:19 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,109 |
| 33007036 (Comments: 1) | Luuuddooo (Discussed changesets: 18) | Salut Ludo, J'ai remarqué une petite erreur sur le tag osmc:symbol. La "bonne" valeur est yellow_bar Tu peux peux la tester ici : https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/osmc_symbols.html Cordialement,<... commented 2025-08-19 17:52:36 UTC by pyrog ♦357 |
| 170683540 (Comments: 1) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nie ma potrzeby dodawania `foot=yes` do drogi tego typu, to zbędny tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland commented 2025-08-19 17:48:40 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,109 |
| 170230560 (Comments: 3) | RIL91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, danke fürs Ergänzen der Eingänge Gruss wies1 commented 2025-08-19 17:43:57 UTC by wies1 ♦154 |
| 170652393 (Comments: 1) | Amihan_ir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-19 17:42:13 UTC by Comino ♦120 |
| 170672351 (Comments: 1) | Auto Peças Lopes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-19 17:41:19 UTC by Comino ♦120 |
| 170683155 (Comments: 1) | Dante_Garcia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Es correcto, ahi hay una tienda de articulos deportivos commented 2025-08-19 17:36:52 UTC by Jocy0983 ♦1 |
| 110081197 (Comments: 2) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 103) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170683167 commented 2025-08-19 17:27:38 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,412 |
| 170660944 (Comments: 1) | unova52 (Discussed changesets: 1) | For routing purposes, it's better to leave the sidewalk as connecting and ending at the road commented 2025-08-19 17:21:31 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 170583816 (Comments: 2) | snail044 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello cquest, thanks for your help! It happend when I added an area with inner relation and I don't know why. From that moment on I considered how to get the forest area back. commented 2025-08-19 17:18:41 UTC by snail044 ♦5 |
| 160368525 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | I see that you added layer=-2 to the sidewalk of Jermyn Street / Duke Street St James. It seem unlikely that it is actually subterranean, so I am guessing that you used Rabid's helpfult feature to let you hide a potential problem with a highway-... commented 2025-08-19 17:11:53 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170674066 (Comments: 1) | Jpnod (Discussed changesets: 2) | The crossing on Kinzie is definitely concrete. Please double check your changes commented 2025-08-19 17:11:09 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 164208705 (Comments: 6) | Đuro Jiří (Discussed changesets: 82) | Le jalon de la déviation est ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13082185600#map=19/43.678142/4.440934&layers=PN Sretan planinarski izlet i još jednom hvala. commented 2025-08-19 17:08:49 UTC by pyrog ♦357 |
| 160447835 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Was there any particular reason why you replaced sidewalk:both=separate with sidewalk=separate on Poland Street, Great Pulteney Street and Lexington Street? (Already fixed by another user) commented 2025-08-19 17:06:16 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170674450 (Comments: 1) | Jpnod (Discussed changesets: 2) | Both sidewalk-alley crossings are clearly concrete in Aerial and streetside imagery commented 2025-08-19 17:05:10 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 160209584 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Pedestrian only crossings of public roads in the UK are *never* marked with dashes. The dashed markings on Hulme Street either side of its junction with Cambridge Street are give way markings. They have nothing to do with the crossing other th... commented 2025-08-19 16:51:27 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170670114 (Comments: 8) | OlafJanssen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dus pas bij opening amenity=archive taggen of office=archive commented 2025-08-19 16:46:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170609101 (Comments: 1) | pyrog (Discussed changesets: 94) | https://gard.ffrandonnee.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/87/2025/07/arrete-st-gilles.pdf commented 2025-08-19 16:42:46 UTC by pyrog ♦357 |
| 169536155 (Comments: 1) | johnde56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed that some edits from a few months ago have been reverted (deletion of the sidewalk:both separate) tag as one example. I'm not sure if that was intentional because the tag was added back a few days later. Could you check that you ha... commented 2025-08-19 16:41:14 UTC by valaise ♦14 |
| 170646060 (Comments: 1) | jassisharma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170646060 commented 2025-08-19 16:39:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170641524 (Comments: 1) | oaomer1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It appears you added a building within a building which another user fixed. In cases like this, just add a node for the teen life center. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/17064152... commented 2025-08-19 16:37:30 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170634649 (Comments: 1) | Stratification (Discussed changesets: 1) | typically the maxspeed is added to the road. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170634649 commented 2025-08-19 16:32:37 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170408659 (Comments: 3) | hchchc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Il problema è che non hai sostituito" un sentiero, lo hai cancellato il sentiero senza preoccuparti di spezzare la relazione. Una cosa è un sentiero nel bosco ed un'altra è credere che un gps sia la verità ass... commented 2025-08-19 16:30:20 UTC by Jrachi ♦776 |
| 170596487 (Comments: 1) | Fekiha Alemu (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. I have reverted th... commented 2025-08-19 16:30:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170405454 (Comments: 2) | Shyshka (Discussed changesets: 51) | Дякую! commented 2025-08-19 16:27:23 UTC by Shyshka ♦42 |
| 170597877 (Comments: 1) | agl12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Islands in the sea also need the tag natural-coastline. The outline needs to have the ocean on the right hand side. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland Coastlines in OSM are very different from just about everything else... commented 2025-08-19 16:25:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,329 |
| 170409724 (Comments: 2) | VLD299 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello StC, I apologize for my mistake and will try to be more cautious of route connectivity while editing. Thanks for resolving the continuity issue. -Conor commented 2025-08-19 16:22:29 UTC by VLD299 ♦2 |
| 170669845 (Comments: 5) | Siard (Discussed changesets: 4) | Als het niks was kan weg... Soms heb je van de olifantenpaadjes die vanzelf ontstaan door gebruik. Die tag je met highway=path informal=yes path=desire commented 2025-08-19 16:18:45 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170669988 (Comments: 8) | RuudBNL (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Dagricultural commented 2025-08-19 16:16:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170013145 (Comments: 3) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 28) | Bonjour zorun. Merci pour l'invitation, ça fait déjà quelques années que je souhaite y participer, malheureusement sans y parvenir pour l'instant. J'espère donc une prochaine fois ! J'ai pr... commented 2025-08-19 16:09:38 UTC by Lisapple ♦44 |
| 170671289 (Comments: 4) | wegroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | So, if I want to make a conference room rental, should I do it different? I own 5 conferenco room rentals in Warsaw, so I want to do it right... commented 2025-08-19 16:07:00 UTC by wegroup ♦1 |
| 170670102 (Comments: 3) | RuudBNL (Discussed changesets: 6) | In dat geval dus motor_vehicle=yes en de maxwidth:physical=2 toevoegen. commented 2025-08-19 16:04:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170483294 (Comments: 2) | Gerold (Discussed changesets: 49) | Ich hab den Zeitplan grad nicht greifbar, die Straße wird aber komplett neu mit geändertem Verlauf gemacht. Vor Ende 2026 würde ich da nicht mit einer Freigabe des neuen Straße rechnen. Den zukünftigen Verlauf findet man au... commented 2025-08-19 15:40:34 UTC by Gerold ♦25 |
| 152479186 (Comments: 1) | iamsaurabhc (Discussed changesets: 2) | You have incorrectly classified this SH as secondary. You OLA editors should stop copying from google maps. commented 2025-08-19 15:38:32 UTC by Vis_M ♦19 |
| 170670189 (Comments: 2) | open_joe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo David, ja, sorry, ich mache das zum ersten Mal. Ich finde das Feld für den Haupt-Tag nicht. Ja, es ist z.Zt. ein Onlineshop ohne Ladengeschäft. Die Adresse ist der Firmensitz und die Kunden können aber Ihre Artikel dort... commented 2025-08-19 15:37:09 UTC by open_joe ♦1 |
| 170503642 (Comments: 1) | ₘₘ11056 (Discussed changesets: 1) | if this alternate isn't an official trail (like a ducked route around snow) please add informal=yes and a sac_scale= (if suitable). thanks for the update! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.o... commented 2025-08-19 15:24:41 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦107 |
| 170604972 (Comments: 3) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 115) | Plan powstania pełnej dokumentacji został przesunięty na 2027 rok. Decyzja środowiskowa dla zmapowanego wariantu została zaskarżona do SKO w Siedlcach, SKO ją oddalił, ale WSA uchyli decyzję SKO i teraz czekamy na ponowną decyzję SKO. <... commented 2025-08-19 15:24:28 UTC by SpinOff ♦298 |
| 166130616 (Comments: 1) | Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Dani Safa Adi Nugraha, I saw you added a ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385685043) near Kaligawe that isn’t connected to any ferry terminals. The OSM wiki page for ferries states that “The ferry route should ... commented 2025-08-19 15:22:06 UTC by maps_not_naps ♦4 |
| 155394948 (Comments: 1) | ElementoGEO (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello ElementoGEO, I saw you added the route=ferry tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226920744. I am wondering if you know if there are more ferry routes here? I see there are other ways this is connected to such as https://www.openstre... commented 2025-08-19 15:21:07 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦60 |
| 149366012 (Comments: 3) | t_ja (Discussed changesets: 13) | Neviem ako to suvisi s Overpass, ale ak su vsetky slovenske adresy na uzemi Slovenska a hranicu Slovenska mame v OSM spravne, tak asi nie je potrebny. Ja len aby sme tie adresy mali vsade konzistentne. Ak Dodka presvedcite aby to negeneroval, nemam ... commented 2025-08-19 15:20:47 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170587849 (Comments: 1) | RhinoJeep (Discussed changesets: 1) | for meadow restoration consider using the `closed:highway` lifecycle prefix and/or tagging access=no. the old trail will show up on satellite and gps heatmaps for many years and often get mapped as new trails again and again when they are deleted. |
| 170637090 (Comments: 1) | Keith Helbley (Discussed changesets: 12) | hi! the trail updates look to be a bit further off than the current Strava heatmap + 3DEP LiDAR data implies. was there an issue on the ground with the existing path? satellite is often misaligned around this part of the park --- ... commented 2025-08-19 15:16:04 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦107 |
| 170009913 (Comments: 3) | Przemek_Bo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your many edits in this area! commented 2025-08-19 15:07:19 UTC by セコイア ♦2 |
| 15189682 (Comments: 1) | rewelator (Discussed changesets: 3) | ta droga nadal jest planowana? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105480434/history commented 2025-08-19 15:02:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170644099 (Comments: 3) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Siguiendo el tema de Belén, en el SII por ejemplo dice incorrectamente "Huelén", que puede ser una confusión o un nombre original que ya no se usa. También hay otros fundos que en el sii aparecen como "reser... commented 2025-08-19 15:02:22 UTC by James2813 ♦10 |
| 170674816 (Comments: 1) | Freszy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-08-19 15:01:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 23953198 (Comments: 1) | Perimex (Discussed changesets: 86) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291344242/history - czy to są jakieś realne plany? kiedy to powstanie? commented 2025-08-19 14:55:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 24178281 (Comments: 1) | gormur (Discussed changesets: 73) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291344242/history - czy to są jakieś realne plany? kiedy to powstanie? commented 2025-08-19 14:55:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 65468602 (Comments: 1) | MrWebber (Discussed changesets: 60) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291344242/history - czy to są jakieś realne plany? commented 2025-08-19 14:55:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 165267908 (Comments: 1) | Geoinfo3BI (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hej hej, habt ihr mal eure Straßenmeisterei dort hingeschickt? Denn vor Ort IST ein ganz offizielles Straßennamenschild commented 2025-08-19 14:53:57 UTC by DeFra85 ♦239 |
| 154699200 (Comments: 1) | NT Formby paths (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why are there two Asparagus Trail relations commented 2025-08-19 14:52:56 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,384 |
| 170661883 (Comments: 3) | Meow56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes indeed, webhallen's been replaced by inet commented 2025-08-19 14:52:14 UTC by Meow56 ♦1 |
| 169923323 (Comments: 3) | jieff6_10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | je vois que vous avez procédé au changement il y a 8 jours, merci beaucoup :-) commented 2025-08-19 14:47:14 UTC by jieff6_10 ♦1 |
| 170671345 (Comments: 2) | dino_dos_morangos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, bem reparado, pensei que tinha alterado uma área feita por mim, obrigado pelo reparo e boas contribuiçoes! commented 2025-08-19 14:40:36 UTC by dino_dos_morangos ♦1 |
| 170513068 (Comments: 1) | PiaVespRoll (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-19 14:40:11 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
 | 170570981 (Comments: 1) | JMGonk (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-19 14:26:47 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170653112 (Comments: 3) | hqs-plus (Discussed changesets: 9) | Der Bunker an den Koordinaten ist offen und leer. commented 2025-08-19 14:25:46 UTC by hqs-plus ♦29 |
| 170559231 (Comments: 1) | Andreas Kohout (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-19 14:25:39 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170606864 (Comments: 1) | Yiyi (itwikipedia) (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-19 14:20:14 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170673201 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 14) | A korábban lekommunikálásra került BicApp alkalmazás érdekében a pilisben kapott még néhány szakasz bb365 tag-et a könnyebb visszakereshetőség érdekében, d... commented 2025-08-19 14:18:45 UTC by Fiorentina ♦3 |
| 170670622 (Comments: 3) | harrer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die Abschnitte sind noch nicht so lange in der Datenbank und sie wurden mit "access=no" (also quasi "gesperrt") aufgenommen ohne Fahrräder wieder explizit frei zu geben. Dies passiert grad. Du kannst dir die Abschnitte... commented 2025-08-19 14:18:39 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 170520838 (Comments: 4) | ffunk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, klar das ist möglich und auch geplant. Im Zuge von Aus- und Fortbildung sowie anlässlich der Erstellung von Einsatzkonzepten. Da wir jedoch rein ehrenamtlich organisiert sind war es wichtig zunächst Daten überhaupt im Feld ... commented 2025-08-19 14:11:15 UTC by ffunk ♦1 |
| 170669389 (Comments: 1) | 刘克清 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ, as-salāmu ʿalaykum, 👋😳 Good, --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170669389 commented 2025-08-19 14:11:02 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170671992 (Comments: 2) | joyclem (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thank you :) commented 2025-08-19 14:08:37 UTC by joyclem ♦13 |
| 170440813 (Comments: 1) | Andrijana14 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Andrijana14 Ich habe bemerkt, dass du in Fribourg auf den Gleisen 4/5 und 2/3 einige Footways hinzugefügt hast. Diese Footways sind leider nicht physikalisch : Sie verbinden den unteren Teil einer Treppe mit der Plattform eine Etage h&o... commented 2025-08-19 14:06:33 UTC by rokas_osm ♦8 |
| 170670192 (Comments: 1) | Siard (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alle begin is moeilijk .. Ik heb de paden en serviceroad weer losgemaakt van de landuse. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170670192 Editor iD heeft de neiging alles aan elkaar te plakken. De linker alttoets gebruiken tijde... commented 2025-08-19 14:01:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170283788 (Comments: 2) | Map_Team (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thierry Charlès merci de répondre aux messages 😉 https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=21628249 commented 2025-08-19 14:01:27 UTC by pyrog ♦357 |
| 170663617 (Comments: 2) | Stephen Michael Griffiths (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The highways were ok before your modifications which disconnected several highways, resulting in the warnings given above. It might be best to revert this changeset. Need help please just ask. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-08-19 14:00:58 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,896 |
| 170624372 (Comments: 1) | SPanthou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, D'après le cadastre ce chemin est publique. Je revert ce changement. Cordialement, Nicolas commented 2025-08-19 14:00:26 UTC by r2d ♦34 |
| 170616992 (Comments: 2) | wwwit (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dzięki. Poprawiłem commented 2025-08-19 13:47:37 UTC by wwwit ♦5 |
| 143234759 (Comments: 3) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 288) | I think I'm starting to understand it now. What a convoluted mess. Thanks for explaining commented 2025-08-19 13:46:44 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169108703 (Comments: 5) | Rawmance (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tasaisella ykkönen vaatii jotain painon vaihtoa etu ja takarenkaan välillä. Jos pystyy ajamaan satulassa ilman painonvaihtoa niin se kielii nollista. Luomulla voi paikoin joutua nousemaan polkemaan ylämäkeen mutta se liittyy ... commented 2025-08-19 13:45:35 UTC by Rawmance ♦2 |
| 170618124 (Comments: 2) | CoryS89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I see, I have set the roads to access=private. Thank you for your help. :) commented 2025-08-19 13:40:24 UTC by CoryS89 ♦2 |
| 170332964 (Comments: 27) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Dito. :-) commented 2025-08-19 13:40:21 UTC by North14 ♦9 |
| 170664935 (Comments: 3) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 127) | The Mapnik icon does look more Britishly appropriate, now that I've seen it. commented 2025-08-19 13:31:26 UTC by Pink Duck ♦155 |
| 170384875 (Comments: 4) | Mauro78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Si ho fatto le ho risistemate tutte una ad una. commented 2025-08-19 13:28:21 UTC by Mauro78 ♦1 |
| 169674285 (Comments: 3) | Herbal90 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Közben átállítottam az accesst erre a szakaszra is egy másik szerkesztéssel, nemsokára látszódnia kellene majd a csempéken is. commented 2025-08-19 13:24:35 UTC by Herbal90 ♦2 |
| 170667876 (Comments: 1) | AueCees (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Tip Probeer het gebied waar je iets aanpast wat kleiner te houden. Bij de supermarkt en het tankstation heb je nog oud... commented 2025-08-19 13:19:52 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170665895 (Comments: 1) | StereoSanctity (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 13:16:50 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170660321 (Comments: 1) | Wout van Koot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Beste Wout.. Gebouwen worden precies ingemeten geïmporteerd. Via het forum kun je om een update vragen. Op grond van een schuingenomen luchtfoto kun je geen gebouwen uitlijnen.... en nooit naar de daken kijken. Ik heb de gebouwen opnieuw ... commented 2025-08-19 13:15:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169215892 (Comments: 3) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 7) | C'est un vrai bravo, mais oui il y a un problème ou plutôt une suggestion d'amélioration : c'est juste un bout du ruisseau. Pour concaténer les bouts il faut une relation. Sur iD : en bas de ton chemin ... commented 2025-08-19 13:15:12 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 170659937 (Comments: 1) | Wout van Koot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 13:10:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170656151 (Comments: 1) | JanVanHoofddorp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 13:08:10 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170658878 (Comments: 1) | jdh009 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 13:07:05 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 169055978 (Comments: 1) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Det ser ut som det er to stier oppå hverandre her. Den ene har du gitt mtb:scale=1+ (som blir blå, men antyder "vanskelig blå"), mens den andre stien ikke har noen mtb:scale. det er lurt å rydde litt opp for &ari... commented 2025-08-19 13:06:03 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 164357969 (Comments: 2) | Philippe Vogel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oui, commented 2025-08-19 13:04:24 UTC by Philippe Vogel ♦1 |
| 170669617 (Comments: 1) | Carlos Brys (Discussed changesets: 45) | Pasé el número de la calle a la etiqueta alt_name=Calle 57 para respetar las convenciones de los nombres de las vías de circulación commented 2025-08-19 13:04:07 UTC by Carlos Brys ♦273 |
| 170271320 (Comments: 6) | PdxKicker (Discussed changesets: 3) | I am using mobile and didn't know if the comment went through or not. Sorry for multiple messages. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271320 ... commented 2025-08-19 12:57:17 UTC by PdxKicker ♦3 |
| 170668906 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 382) | Löst https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4918160 commented 2025-08-19 12:49:31 UTC by habi ♦1,869 |
| 167460562 (Comments: 1) | Karenjg (Discussed changesets: 2) | These roads were mapped in 2020 as service driveway kind. Why did you change them to residential, for what is a cemetery surfaced access route? commented 2025-08-19 12:42:55 UTC by Pink Duck ♦155 |
| 170648922 (Comments: 1) | KimN Pfister (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Kim Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. So wie du hier die Öffnungszeiten angepasst hast (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170648922), ist d... commented 2025-08-19 12:42:46 UTC by habi ♦1,869 |
| 170637378 (Comments: 1) | MaperDave (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, nie je nutné vytvárať aj bod, aj do plochy pridať, že sa jedná o pizzériu. Každý má iný preferovaný spôsob, ale použitie oboch naraz nie je správne. Ja uprednos... commented 2025-08-19 12:28:42 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170666118 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Fixed in changeset 170667491 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170667491 commented 2025-08-19 12:24:15 UTC by TinPetreković ♦110 |
| 170619959 (Comments: 1) | zemcoj (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdravím, názvy už boli na jednotlivých reláciách. Nie je nutné ich pridávať aj na jednotlivé čiary. commented 2025-08-19 12:23:58 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170651921 (Comments: 1) | kacper112 (Discussed changesets: 17) | name=Zakład Pogrzebowy to raczej nazwa opisowa i powinna zniknąć. Nazwę w name można dać jeżeli się ją zna a to że to zakład pogrzebowy określają tagi. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13081285136 commented 2025-08-19 12:19:05 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦513 |
 | 169934217 (Comments: 4) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 12) | Yes, I believe Wikipedia can be used as a reference and source of truth, though information shouldn't be copied from it directly. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia commented 2025-08-19 12:17:38 UTC by dankarran ♦93 |
| 170557281 (Comments: 1) | editor0110 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo lieber editor0110, lass uns doch vor Ort mal treffen um diesen Weg zu Besichtigen wenn der tatsächlich da ist. commented 2025-08-19 12:17:13 UTC by Wildschutz ♦4 |
| 170644413 (Comments: 3) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola James. Hay varios errores en OSM y los estamos corrigiendo, Pero =farm es la etiqueta correcta. saludos commented 2025-08-19 12:15:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,444 |
| 170618234 (Comments: 2) | Mohamed_Taha (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Patrik_B, Thank you for your message and the clarification about the custom imagery. My edit was to fix the crossing roads validation errors that you left after your edits, not to overwrite your updates. You can check my edits and your ed... commented 2025-08-19 12:05:28 UTC by Mohamed_Taha ♦14 |
| 170665120 (Comments: 1) | Geoworldconsult (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. We welcome you as a new mapper. We cannot expect that a new mapper maps everything in according to the requirements. Here I show you where your mappings are not in line with the mapping standards.... commented 2025-08-19 12:01:56 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170639532 (Comments: 1) | Sebastiansso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao e benvenuto su OSM! Ho avuto modo di revisionare questo tuo changeset ed ho notato che hai inserito o modificato dei dati che, a parer mio, potrebbero essere più chiari e completi se discussi, in particolare quelli dell'ospeda... commented 2025-08-19 11:57:14 UTC by EneaSuper ♦460 |
| 170664459 (Comments: 1) | k2101 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13081635708 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-08-19 11:41:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170663720 (Comments: 2) | GR-menneke (Discussed changesets: 35) | Neen, dit kan zeker niet, maar TW Geel is met het bestuur van stad Geel bezig om structuur trage wegen in overleg met aangelande te verplaatsen. commented 2025-08-19 11:33:19 UTC by GR-menneke ♦27 |
| 162726774 (Comments: 2) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, Stretch Longfellow! My name is Ravinder, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. I left one road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/660070833) with the driveway tag because it was already mapped as a driveway. I added th... commented 2025-08-19 11:21:23 UTC by rsitoni_Lyft ♦4 |
| 170462117 (Comments: 1) | Mstarseed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Mstarseed! Could you please provide information about the source of your mapping activity? I've noticed that some of your edits are hard to verify, and I’d like to know which source you used. --- ... commented 2025-08-19 11:13:46 UTC by Jurygr ♦2 |
| 170612909 (Comments: 5) | sharp gift (Discussed changesets: 5) | It's there now. I've separated the shop tags from the building tags and created two areas for Aldi and M&S. The area of the M&S matches roughly the press release count of 12000 sq ft (1115 sq m); but the shape/location may be a bit... commented 2025-08-19 11:12:28 UTC by spiregrain ♦203 |
| 170625153 (Comments: 2) | silversurfer83 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Moin Ja. Hab ich beim Bearbeiten schon gesehen, dass hier die Wiesen und place=localities in unmögliche Relationen gepackt wurden, die es unglaublich aufwändig machen hier etwas zu bearbeiten, wie zB landuse von highways zu trennen. ... commented 2025-08-19 11:11:17 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 158885900 (Comments: 2) | Nuern (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wie alt ist das Luftbild? Das Gebäude steht dort. commented 2025-08-19 11:10:15 UTC by Nuern ♦1 |
| 170404459 (Comments: 1) | celinathome (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individual. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-19 11:04:41 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170410087 (Comments: 4) | VladaC (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sorry for a video link but I could not find anything better than this: https://youtu.be/YQvoLBhFR1I?si=FOwrBj_pR4789Pab I can supply a photo and a pictogram of the socket for wiki in about two weeks but not now. commented 2025-08-19 10:54:50 UTC by VladaC ♦36 |
| 164117508 (Comments: 11) | Wildschutz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, lieber woodpeck, lieber rempshaener. Gerne können wir uns vor Ort ein Bild davon machen. commented 2025-08-19 10:50:28 UTC by Wildschutz ♦4 |
| 170154044 (Comments: 1) | kasztelan111 (Discussed changesets: 104) | Są jakieś plany budowy tych ulic czy to nazwy nadane na zapas? commented 2025-08-19 10:46:22 UTC by theDM ♦119 |
| 170604829 (Comments: 5) | Jakaka2222 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ik heb ivm navigatie nog 2 knooppunten 06 toegevoegd. Met name, die bij de zuidelijke afslag is belangrijk, zonder dit knooppunt zal een routeplanner voor een route 07-06-10, je eerst naar de zuidelijke 06 sturen en dan pas naar 10. Maar ook de... commented 2025-08-19 10:39:39 UTC by dvdhoven ♦937 |
| 170404548 (Comments: 1) | Oriejella (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. Please do not include the shadow of a building into your mapping. Best regards commented 2025-08-19 10:38:12 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170325761 (Comments: 2) | dy24 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Izmaiņas atcēlu - ceļa nepareiza pārklasifikācija. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170325761 commented 2025-08-19 10:37:51 UTC by Pilsetkartetajs ♦13 |
| 101380586 (Comments: 1) | gorozdos (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dakujem. Ak je to teda klub, treba aj pridat prislusne znacky, napr. club=sport, sport=canoe. Zadanie len nazvu na budovu nestaci, nedava to ziadnu informaciu o aky typ objektu ide. To co ste urobili je len nazov budovy, bez toho aby tam nejak... commented 2025-08-19 10:35:30 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,636 |
| 170624657 (Comments: 3) | heiclaud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Rückmeldung :) Nu sieht's plausibler aus. Happy mapping commented 2025-08-19 10:32:44 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,524 |
| 170641929 (Comments: 3) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bez iemesla vairākas reizes salauzta pareizi iezīmēta relācija. Izmaiņas atcēlu, kā to jau izdarīja cits kartētājs iepriekš. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2025-08-19 10:30:43 UTC by Pilsetkartetajs ♦13 |
| 170658425 (Comments: 1) | KonradGSD (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-19 10:23:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170657697 (Comments: 2) | maciekjg (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-19 10:23:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170172503 (Comments: 1) | od@KA30AG41 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Du hast in diesem Changeset auch Wegweiser zugefügt. Mindestens einer davon, an dem ich auch vorbeigeradelt bin, ist eigentlich ein route_marker und für Fahrräder. Da sollte also noch bicycle=yes dazu. Bei dem einen habe ich e... commented 2025-08-19 10:20:12 UTC by nurdafur ♦228 |
| 170600548 (Comments: 1) | mustwinelite (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=35867&type=part&key=13 commented 2025-08-19 10:16:35 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170509160 (Comments: 9) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 148) | in terms of next steps, I would suggest writing a detailed proposal based on the advice here: https://osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines so that the issues above can be discussed in detail commented 2025-08-19 10:14:56 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦392 |
| 170655939 (Comments: 1) | emmattttttt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Heya, thanks for your contributions to Kendal recently. Adding hundreds of buildings which are wonky and not split correctly (semis/terraces) is not actually that helpful for the map, as someone will have to come along and split them up and square th... commented 2025-08-19 10:14:54 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 93316305 (Comments: 2) | Radbubi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo, das war in der Tat ein Versehen, der Plätz hätte von mir eigentlich gar nicht bearbeitet werden sollen, da ich ihn gar nicht kenne. Daher kann ich auch nicht sagen, ob der aktuelle Tag besser ist oder der aus Version #1. Gr&uum... commented 2025-08-19 10:08:47 UTC by Radbubi ♦14 |
| 170660440 (Comments: 1) | robbie_morrison (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, prior name was "TA" not "HA" as logged. commented 2025-08-19 10:08:37 UTC by robbie_morrison ♦2 |
| 170638951 (Comments: 3) | 0x7700e6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Actually, just found out this can be applied to a majority of buildings with 90 degree corners. My edits looks so much better now, thank you. commented 2025-08-19 10:06:52 UTC by 0x7700e6 ♦1 |
| 170591917 (Comments: 3) | marksnso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо, исправил commented 2025-08-19 10:05:30 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,036 |
| 145147102 (Comments: 2) | anne_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello, Merci pour ta vigilance et ta proposition d'ajout sur le wiki :) Nous utilisons ce tag chez geovelo régulièrement dans les cas où il y a plusieurs paramètres présents : présence d... commented 2025-08-19 09:50:53 UTC by anne_geovelo ♦21 |
| 170659733 (Comments: 1) | pfhllnts (Discussed changesets: 18) | @bxlforever Please review and express your opinion on moving the tram stop a bit southwest commented 2025-08-19 09:48:26 UTC by pfhllnts ♦17 |
| 127374929 (Comments: 1) | Zizozu (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, " - Lycée Dupuy-de-Lôme" dans les noms n'a pas lieu d'être, le CDI c'est le CDI, il est situé dans le lycée, lycée nommé par ailleurs. commented 2025-08-19 09:46:20 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 169870611 (Comments: 2) | h0rr0rrdrag0n (Discussed changesets: 3) | Спасибо за правку! Да, UUID был не тот — я взял его из списка своих загруженных фото, а оказывается надо было из URL для фото с общей карты (н... commented 2025-08-19 09:38:41 UTC by h0rr0rrdrag0n ♦11 |
| 170657172 (Comments: 1) | rampenbestrijding (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag rampenbestrijding. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-19 09:26:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 155406971 (Comments: 1) | Bruno1460 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Bonjour, est-ce que l'itinéraire "Entre collines et Canal – Boucle de 20 Km" a un marquage sur le terrain ? je pose cette question car le passage de l'écluse semble compliqué. il y a par ex un u... commented 2025-08-19 09:26:18 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,270 |
| 170623219 (Comments: 5) | fabil7h (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin @rempshaener! Ich habe mir die verlinkten Artikel und weitere Quellen durchgelesen. Das hatte ich vorher leider übersehen. Der „name“ ist nun bereinigt (siehe Changeset 170658251). Falls es noch weiteres gi... commented 2025-08-19 09:25:45 UTC by fabil7h ♦1 |
| X | 170638215 (Comments: 1) | Mario Endrigo ramos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Mario Endrigo ramos, it looks like there is something wrong with your Organic Maps app, it created hundreds of empty changesets in recent days. Could you please try to reset the local map editing storage in the app by typing "... commented 2025-08-19 09:14:16 UTC by map per ♦1,306 |
| 170640942 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 21) | Dag kOSMofant, Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed en de manier waarop ook. Dit is wel een heel korte periode. Beetje op het randje. Voor een week zou ik het zelf niet afsluiten met conditional-tagging. Er zijn immers routers die dan ... commented 2025-08-19 09:07:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170377199 (Comments: 8) | buy_osmand (Discussed changesets: 53) | You three have truly disrupted my appetite to eat. I shall cool off and not return for the longest while again for the second time .. such a heart wrenching experience to give your time and energy to mapping your own nation's map.. I've cau... commented 2025-08-19 09:00:34 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170505416 (Comments: 4) | Mikhail Kuzin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pascal We've reworked the split algorithm a bit, made it more like ID. And I've edited the neighboring intersection. Could you take a look at this changeset in terms of the correctness of saving history and other things. I&... commented 2025-08-19 08:56:48 UTC by Mikhail Kuzin ♦2 |
| 166447313 (Comments: 1) | matsumi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Приветствую! Пожалуйста, не проставляйте этажи у домов по каким-то косвенным признакам, как тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104013586/history Там вся... commented 2025-08-19 08:53:16 UTC by basilisk ♦17 |
| 157506875 (Comments: 1) | LeFourbe (Discussed changesets: 2) | You could have kept old_name=Géant Casino or was:brand=Géant Casino as it ma be still known under the old name. commented 2025-08-19 08:48:42 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 170574021 (Comments: 3) | noenoenoe123 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Je peux te confirmer que ce Géant Casinon est devenu Carrefour, et donc je maintiens que c'est le noeud osm.org/node/11868781870 qui est à mettre à jour (et ton nouveau noeud à supprimer). Voir https://actu.fr/bre... commented 2025-08-19 08:43:16 UTC by trial ♦897 |
 | 170590862 (Comments: 1) | ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI, Thank you for your contribution to improving the road network on OpenStreetMap. I noticed in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170590862 That you changed some roads to “operational&... commented 2025-08-19 08:38:57 UTC by salma_z ♦18 |
| 170654414 (Comments: 1) | Pierre Guillou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci ! commented 2025-08-19 08:37:02 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 170653408 (Comments: 4) | ralrei (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry, Test war mir nicht aufgefallen. Sah nach Vandalismus oder einem Versehen aus. Ist mir aber neu, dass man zu Testzwecken falsche Daten in die offizielle Karte zeichnet. commented 2025-08-19 08:33:05 UTC by ralrei ♦21 |
| 170655238 (Comments: 1) | johnmama (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 08:24:20 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170646267 (Comments: 1) | JanFi (Discussed changesets: 50) | Merci Jan, ik stond net op het punt om hetzelfde te doen! commented 2025-08-19 08:14:57 UTC by Ruben Van de Velde ♦33 |
| 170646122 (Comments: 1) | Eli gh se g a egg co hey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes with https://www.osm.org/changeset/170654970 commented 2025-08-19 08:12:08 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 30457804 (Comments: 1) | FreedSky (Discussed changesets: 57) | Is there really a ferry here? commented 2025-08-19 08:11:35 UTC by rene78 ♦452 |
| 170645271 (Comments: 1) | FrozenTomb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! You can also add the gate (as a node on the street) with the key barrier. For Details see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:barrier commented 2025-08-19 08:08:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170603904 (Comments: 6) | basilisk (Discussed changesets: 3) | Моя вина: в арку я и не заглянул. Просто глянул, что на месте кафешка, а должен был быть веломагазин. Чаще же просто на одной площади тупо м... commented 2025-08-19 08:02:52 UTC by basilisk ♦17 |
| 170523784 (Comments: 4) | diodaix (Discussed changesets: 5) | Of course! We can use kodewilayah.id as source, it's free for use commented 2025-08-19 07:55:08 UTC by diodaix ♦7 |
| 156017582 (Comments: 1) | NaSH (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312438862#map=19/45.634253/-1.037902 you are using landuse=gravel, but also you are using surface=gravel. Please note that landuse=gravel is not a recognised value according to the wiki. ... commented 2025-08-19 07:46:25 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 163901795 (Comments: 2) | AnatoleFrance (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour Matthieu, Merci beaucoup pour votre retour. Cela fait maintenant quelques mois que je suis sur OSM mais je suis toujours en apprentissage du bon fonctionnement de cet outil et je suis donc à l'écoute de tous les reto... commented 2025-08-19 07:41:08 UTC by AnatoleFrance ♦7 |
| 169768799 (Comments: 1) | _lele_ (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ciao. Benvenuto nella mappa più bella del mondo. Ma anche quella che ha regole travisate e scombinate di continuo... Vedo che gai aggiunto i valori di default su alcune highway. Se non sai cos'è un default, ti invito a leg... commented 2025-08-19 07:36:15 UTC by Jrachi ♦776 |
| 170495743 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zmieniłem lokalizację przystanku na faktyczną: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170652928 commented 2025-08-19 07:35:10 UTC by SzymonH ♦210 |
| 97305341 (Comments: 1) | LängengradLuigi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Servus, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28222103 bei dem weg ist dir ein Fehler reingerutscht, beide Seiten "cycleway:left=no" (und rechts) :D Ich habs mal geändert. commented 2025-08-19 07:24:17 UTC by Negreheb ♦277 |
| 170648375 (Comments: 1) | silverbullet (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, was genau "testest" du hier? Denke bitte auch daran, einen Punkt als Dezimaltrenner zu verwenden, kein Komma. Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen :) David commented 2025-08-19 07:23:58 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 125205245 (Comments: 5) | taketaketake (Discussed changesets: 36) | 付け加えると、誰かによって県道が全て結合されていたため交差点部で分離をしました。 その時にはmaxspeed = 40;50がすでに書き込まれていました。 私が新規でmaxspeedを記入したと勘... commented 2025-08-19 07:21:24 UTC by taketaketake ♦17 |
| 170649461 (Comments: 1) | Pebbi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OSM :) Was ist das für ein Gelände? Ein Themepark (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=theme%20park?uselang=de) ist es sicherlich nicht. Ich helfe dir gern, da ein passendes Tagging zu f... commented 2025-08-19 07:21:19 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170650581 (Comments: 1) | YouMePhoto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, die Adresse ist nicht korrekt eingetragen, bitte korrigieren Viele Grüße David https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:* commented 2025-08-19 07:18:49 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170647054 (Comments: 1) | person33333333333123333333333333333333123333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! If you have any information about why the bridge is closed and how long it will remain closed, it would be helpful to leave a note (key note). commented 2025-08-19 07:18:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170651169 (Comments: 1) | Niemandin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Niemandin, willkommen bei OSM :) kannst du dir die Position nochmal genau anschauen? Das Cafe liegt doch sicher nicht auf dem Fußweg oder im Grünstreifen sondern eher im Gebäude? Viele Grüße un... commented 2025-08-19 07:16:35 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170651406 (Comments: 1) | Nomis101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Nomis101, willkommen bei OSM :) cool dass du dir so viel Arbeit machst mit dem Eintragen der Firmen hier. Bitte beachte aber, dass Namen in OSM nicht abgekürzt werden sollten, siehe Wiki [1]. Abgekürzte Namen können ü... commented 2025-08-19 07:14:20 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170651097 (Comments: 1) | ernie77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and welcome to editing! Typically when updating companies with multiple locations, name is just the name and branch is supposed be spesific location. So name=McDonald's and branch=Mäntsälä for example commented 2025-08-19 06:48:13 UTC by thautal ♦39 |
| 170573309 (Comments: 1) | Sergey Fedorov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Anyone knows why the ladder is not rendered on the map? commented 2025-08-19 06:41:47 UTC by Sergey Fedorov ♦1 |
| 170181499 (Comments: 1) | user_16522352 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Please discuss with others before adding back these names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170649572 commented 2025-08-19 06:39:22 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,583 |
| 170623300 (Comments: 3) | Kratom1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170635905 commented 2025-08-19 06:15:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 164100980 (Comments: 1) | Emdier (Discussed changesets: 6) | 您好, 不建议使用 name 表示楼号, 而建议用 ref 或 addr:housenumber. 也不建议写入通名(座, 号楼). commented 2025-08-19 06:12:01 UTC by YPGGUUY ♦30 |
| 170622326 (Comments: 3) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 240) | eggie, bedankt voor de correcties commented 2025-08-19 06:09:24 UTC by dvdhoven ♦937 |
| 170404947 (Comments: 4) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Vdaka za opravu 👏 commented 2025-08-19 06:02:12 UTC by t_ja ♦209 |
| 170647487 (Comments: 1) | agrifolia (Discussed changesets: 5) | Really solid additions and data updates here — thank you for your efforts at editing OSM! commented 2025-08-19 05:46:51 UTC by stevea ♦309 |
| 170043727 (Comments: 3) | almirku (Discussed changesets: 3) | ок commented 2025-08-19 05:26:38 UTC by Uralla ♦61 |
| 170632388 (Comments: 4) | burrscurr (Discussed changesets: 25) | For context, I changed two things: - Changed type=was:route to type=route (because the route seems to still be active) - Removed the sections in Dresden because, according to the Flixbus website, the bus only stops in Rostock, Dessau, Halle... commented 2025-08-19 05:24:16 UTC by burrscurr ♦81 |
| 164176556 (Comments: 4) | 7tonin (Discussed changesets: 10) | Voici le complément et le développement de cette expérience. Comme c'est la 189ème contribution du fil, voici le lien direct : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/rendu-de-carte-et-mise-en-danger/36419/189 commented 2025-08-19 05:23:13 UTC by 7tonin ♦16 |
 | 170636034 (Comments: 1) | amedranovich (Discussed changesets: 5) | hola, quizá no quedó bien entendido porque no debemos usar edificios de casas en áreas de terrenos. son dos cosas distintas. seguramente estás pensando, pero no "veo" los terrenos en el mapa y necesito ver... commented 2025-08-19 05:12:29 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,584 |
| 170583637 (Comments: 3) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 175) | Currently, there are 483 occurrences ref:bgt:id and your 49 bgt_id. commented 2025-08-19 05:05:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170545199 (Comments: 1) | tassiewatch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Output for chargers has its own tagging rather than adding it into the "name". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=charge_point commented 2025-08-19 04:45:16 UTC by tastrax ♦1,155 |
| 170409650 (Comments: 1) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 35) | 😳👍Good, --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170409650 commented 2025-08-19 04:38:27 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170637903 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 16) | ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ, as-salāmu ʿalaykum, i've intention to mark this changeset as good on OsmCha but was notified," resource not found" https://osmcha.org/changesets/170637903 so, here it go... commented 2025-08-19 04:05:48 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170490601 (Comments: 1) | Austin2000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for making these fixes, and my condolences if you were impacted by the flooding. I went ahead and fixed the road connectivity for the Big Sandy/Round Mouintain intersection, but I have a couple questions if you're on the ground in this ar... commented 2025-08-19 03:06:47 UTC by citrula ♦897 |
| 151579591 (Comments: 1) | AaronFitz (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset was reverted due to presence of NO TRESPASSING sign https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170645170 commented 2025-08-19 01:36:11 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦566 |
| 164657683 (Comments: 1) | Laraemily22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Por favor, não altere o mapa com tags inválidas. Revertido. commented 2025-08-19 01:24:05 UTC by smaprs ♦380 |
| 170614182 (Comments: 4) | W Craig Coffman (Discussed changesets: 3) | I was more making light that no reasonable or prudent cyclist would ride on a narrow bridge sidewalk in the first place, but while we're at it... Oklahoma law under §47-11-1202 defines bicycles as a vehicle, and Oklahoma City Code 32-578 pr... commented 2025-08-19 00:32:21 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,150 |
| 170601778 (Comments: 1) | GmTax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, you've added this onto the building as a whole. I've reverted it, if you wish to add your business, please add it as a node within the bounds of the building. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-08-19 00:29:57 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170558297 (Comments: 3) | W Craig Coffman (Discussed changesets: 3) | OK, you might want to doublecheck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755367124 commented 2025-08-19 00:27:35 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,150 |
| 170606602 (Comments: 3) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 256) | jak to jest rewert czegoś to warto podać czego commented 2025-08-19 00:22:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170607746 (Comments: 17) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 115) | Jak się miesza różne zmiany a opisuje tylko jedne - to nie ma co się oburzac że ktoś chciał wycofać opisaną a załapały się inne ale z http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=170606602 można zerknąć zresztą, wid... commented 2025-08-19 00:22:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170477930 (Comments: 3) | Aikonhill (Discussed changesets: 17) | Roads and paths should not be deleted, as they will lose their history. In a very rare event where a road or path needs to be deleted – rather than edited – please don't delete it without adding the new one, as this is live da... commented 2025-08-18 23:48:40 UTC by MorahT ♦24 |
| 169770443 (Comments: 1) | JspMB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gràcies per la teva contribució. És millor no esborrar el local i dexar-lo buit amb shop=vacant. Així es conserva l'històric del local. Es podria esborrar si el local desapareix, com p.e. desapareix l&... commented 2025-08-18 23:47:48 UTC by Jose Luis Infante ♦475 |
| 170461199 (Comments: 1) | Maradona11 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi, Do you know if you can exit the centre via https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13070375209 ? From the aerial imagery it looks like you should be able to walk out to the car park. Thanks. commented 2025-08-18 23:12:23 UTC by TheSwavu ♦556 |
| 160459080 (Comments: 1) | Sasank Chaganti (Discussed changesets: 5) | You've marked these crossings as not having tactile paving, although it's abundantly clear from the aerial imagery that it is present (it's buff blister paving, used at uncontrolled crossings in the UK). Recording this data accu... commented 2025-08-18 23:02:50 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 160476640 (Comments: 1) | Sasank Chaganti (Discussed changesets: 5) | Don't add non-existent fords, or blindly accept the first suggestion which makes editor warnings go away. It's unlikely that Princess Street would ford the River Medlock, not least because of the ~5 metre difference in height between the ro... commented 2025-08-18 22:58:17 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 169176045 (Comments: 1) | bob1984 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Haha oops xD Love it. commented 2025-08-18 22:55:42 UTC by TheBox193 ♦1 |
| 163962068 (Comments: 1) | Superbee980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Teil-Revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170642771 , siehe auch Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4676656 commented 2025-08-18 22:48:53 UTC by rohieb ♦110 |
| 160489535 (Comments: 2) | Sasank Chaganti (Discussed changesets: 5) | Now fixed, with the footway split and tagged as a bridge, which is what you should have done had you need prioritised hiding an editor warning over actually trying to get it right. commented 2025-08-18 22:48:21 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 168938996 (Comments: 1) | F10sh (Discussed changesets: 13) | This was discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4822816 (and I'd love to see more source=* tags in changesets 😉) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source commented 2025-08-18 22:33:13 UTC by rohieb ♦110 |
| 170578923 (Comments: 3) | rimeraz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Thanks for reply. There are what I would describe as cycle barriers on either end of the path. That is two fences that overlap but with a large gap for a person to pass. I would interpret the barriers as discouraging the path but not bloc... commented 2025-08-18 22:07:37 UTC by kitsee ♦100 |
| 170575237 (Comments: 2) | Anaximandre (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2920857542/history/2 commented 2025-08-18 22:00:40 UTC by MatthieuMartin ♦93 |
| 170611131 (Comments: 1) | mein-albtrauf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo mein-albtrauf! Schön, dass du hier bei OpenStreetMap mitmachst! Herzlich willkommen, auch wenn du schon länger mitmachst, aber bisher hat noch niemand einen deiner Änderungssätze kommentiert, wenn ich es richtig sehe.... commented 2025-08-18 21:56:25 UTC by Metzor ♦380 |
| 124228011 (Comments: 1) | Itzik Arzoni (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Itzik Arzoni, Thank you for your contribution to OSM. In this adit you have added a "foot=no" tag to road 66 from Megiddo to Megiddo junction. What is the source of this tagging/ Is there a road sign that says so? |
| 164862259 (Comments: 1) | Dindia (Discussed changesets: 11) | Removing the foot=no tag is acceptable only if there is no road sign on the ground that prohibits pedestrians. Otherwise, this edit goes against the fundamental principles of good practice. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_prac... commented 2025-08-18 21:38:38 UTC by zstadler ♦1,064 |
| 154091489 (Comments: 2) | memories_den_rob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hii, Good question. I found the names in an physical map inside the bicycle renting shop that I couldn't find online. If you have better information feel free to update OSM. Thanks, Rob commented 2025-08-18 21:32:30 UTC by memories_den_rob ♦3 |
| 170636155 (Comments: 2) | WiFox (Discussed changesets: 3) | Widzę, że poprzednie opisy też masz bogate. Znajdę błąd i poleci wszystko z takim samym szacunkiem jakim darzysz innych. commented 2025-08-18 21:21:52 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦513 |
| 169773248 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 453) | To jest automatyczny komentarz, dodany przez bota, który sprawdza edycje. Ktoś przed tobą zrobił babola. Już poprawione. commented 2025-08-18 21:10:09 UTC by olo81 ♦685 |
| 170576656 (Comments: 3) | Sebastiaan (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is not relevant for mountain scrambling routes which have little to no trail visibility. Completely removing the original source information makes it very difficult to trace back the source of the data, which can be very helpful in many circumst... commented 2025-08-18 21:02:33 UTC by brendan714 ♦12 |
| 170135467 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 453) | Zostawiłeś landuse=commercial co nie jest prawdą. commented 2025-08-18 20:54:40 UTC by olo81 ♦685 |
| 170638388 (Comments: 1) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 115) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-08-18 20:34:14 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170083320 (Comments: 2) | on_thebus009 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My bad, must have been a mouse slip. commented 2025-08-18 20:31:47 UTC by on_thebus009 ♦1 |
| 158945429 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Będę uważał. Pozdrawiam. commented 2025-08-18 20:28:22 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 158590457 (Comments: 1) | T_Tim01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pourquoi changer le numéro de rue ? Sur le site il est au 11 et non au 9. Le bâtiment n'a pas non plus de nom, c'est le nom du club. Et le numéro d'adresse se met usuellement non sur le bâtiment mais &ag... commented 2025-08-18 20:21:41 UTC by trial ♦897 |
| 170638766 (Comments: 1) | evgenykatyshev (Discussed changesets: 62) | My bad. I finally found a photo with waterfall here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170638962 commented 2025-08-18 20:18:25 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
| 159321843 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Przepraszam, że odpowiadam tak późno. Bardzo dziękuję za informacje. Adres firmy znalazłem w internecie na stronie firmy i prawdopodobnie, bezmyślnie skopiowałem. Faktycznie w Sosenkach-Jajkach nie ma nazwanych ulic. commented 2025-08-18 20:16:40 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 170636942 (Comments: 1) | Rijk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Rijk, Je vraagt feedback. Wanneer er geen pad meer is kan het uiteraard weg. Paden die nog herkenbaar zijn op luchtfoto's taggen weg meestal als disused:highway=path . Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-18 20:14:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170623206 (Comments: 2) | jengelh (Discussed changesets: 138) | Es bräuchte auf einer Strecke mit durchgehendem Wendeverbot zwei Restrictions pro Way. Das ist ziemlich idiotisch. Und Wege werden gerne in kleine Happen geteilt, weil sich irgendein surface=, sidewalk=, maxspeed= oder turn:lanes-Wert jede paar... commented 2025-08-18 20:14:55 UTC by jengelh ♦121 |
| 160076050 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dziękuję za informację. Postaram się. :-) commented 2025-08-18 20:06:27 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 160146113 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dziękuję za konstruktywną uwagę i informację. :-) commented 2025-08-18 20:04:56 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 169767886 (Comments: 2) | DPD- (Discussed changesets: 1) | A discapito del nome, non si tratta di una piazza, bensì del cortile dell'adiacente oratorio (Oratorio San GIovanni Paolo II). Tuttavia il nome completo è "Piazza degli AnimaSogni". Ho inserito il numero civico in quanto ... commented 2025-08-18 20:04:16 UTC by DPD- ♦1 |
| 164896946 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Drogi Kocie :-) Sprawdzę. Z reguły opieram się na zdjęciach i cieniowaniu WMS. commented 2025-08-18 20:02:14 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 167495071 (Comments: 3) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Często na zdjęciach lotniczych np. drogi są w niektórych odcinkach niewidoczne. Ponad drogi lesne na cieniowaniu WMS są słabo widoczne. Czasami rysuję, zwłaszcza przebiegi dróg leśnych, jako wypadkowa informacji ze zdjęć, cien... commented 2025-08-18 19:57:50 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 170616172 (Comments: 1) | Macst (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Macst, "Odos" (ΟΔΟΣ, οδος in Greek) means "street", so it doesn't need to be added to the street name. Also, int_name should be updated. I've mapped the same... commented 2025-08-18 19:54:57 UTC by sm4rk0 ♦5 |
| 170638082 (Comments: 1) | Tom van Dijk (Discussed changesets: 15) | Heeft every door wel een beetje bijzonder getagt. Nou ja... commented 2025-08-18 19:52:44 UTC by Tom van Dijk ♦28 |
| 170601199 (Comments: 1) | ToffeHoff (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi ToffeHoff, you added an atm here with an unusual operator: operator=Your Is this maybe a typo and you meant operator=YourCash? Regards, lyctkel commented 2025-08-18 19:38:38 UTC by lyctkel ♦336 |
| 170628758 (Comments: 3) | Frimmer (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi Jrachi, Thank you for your remark! It was right on spot. Have already corrected the dataset. Attila commented 2025-08-18 19:32:45 UTC by Frimmer ♦9 |
| 170637309 (Comments: 1) | Taya Snijder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted Berlin name vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170637380 commented 2025-08-18 19:31:13 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 168243686 (Comments: 5) | Kielwanderer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, verstehe. Dadurch, dass du nur den Parkplatz-Tag (amenity=parking) entfernt hast, geht aus den Daten aktuell nicht hervor, was der aktuelle Status dieser Fläche ist. Ist der Parkplatz aktuell noch in Betrieb? Ist er gesperrt abe noch da? Ist... commented 2025-08-18 19:30:48 UTC by Discostu36 ♦210 |
| 129328720 (Comments: 4) | webfil (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dans le SIG de la Ville de La Tuque, le chemin de Parent (route 25 ou R0461) est en effet de classe 1, mais c'est aussi vrai pour le chemin R0806 (qui relie la R1009 à Senneterre), la R0403 (route 1) de Rivière-aux-Rats à so... commented 2025-08-18 19:26:38 UTC by webfil ♦35 |
| 170511817 (Comments: 3) | Amul (Discussed changesets: 11) | Done! You are welcome! commented 2025-08-18 19:18:09 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170636679 (Comments: 1) | Frederik Ramm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted Berlin name vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170636809 commented 2025-08-18 19:13:47 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170620947 (Comments: 2) | DataFoxOSM23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die 'Cycleroute 85-86 habe ich geändert. Jetzt ist oneway:bicycle=yes kein Ploblem. https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18.0/51.7388/3.8452 Gr eggie commented 2025-08-18 19:13:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170561297 (Comments: 1) | pplaymoo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola pplaymoo, gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap. Con respecto a este área https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385139034#map=18/41.631053/-4.775249 tal vez no sepas que no se admite publicidad en OSM. https://wiki.open... commented 2025-08-18 19:08:40 UTC by MarinoBM ♦99 |
| 170626421 (Comments: 1) | SalvadorBiedma (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ya estaba en el mapa. commented 2025-08-18 18:55:07 UTC by dcapillae ♦372 |
| 170630637 (Comments: 1) | MonsterSnowGoon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci de rajouter des données ferroviaires dans osm. Il ne faut pas utiliser `railway=junction` pour tous les points désignés sauf s'il s'agit réellement d'une jonction ferroviaire. Voir http... commented 2025-08-18 18:54:09 UTC by wolfy1339 ♦26 |
| 170615262 (Comments: 1) | heywhatsthat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/12573156333 more than 100 meters. Please check the position. commented 2025-08-18 18:52:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 168683750 (Comments: 3) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Salve McCio, Le regole per la definizione delle caratteristiche degli edifici 3d le trovi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building Per ragruppare le parti di un edifici... commented 2025-08-18 18:52:01 UTC by Map47 ♦39 |
| 170582992 (Comments: 2) | gnlpfth (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hi, die betroffenen Wege sind korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis! commented 2025-08-18 18:49:17 UTC by gnlpfth ♦74 |
| 170621960 (Comments: 7) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-18 18:48:22 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170614202 (Comments: 4) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-18 18:48:03 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170626415 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-18 18:46:50 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170568475 (Comments: 3) | Jooniebug (Discussed changesets: 1) | Done! You are welcome! commented 2025-08-18 18:45:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170622529 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 364) | naprawione commented 2025-08-18 18:44:06 UTC by Barroszt ♦259 |
| 170540325 (Comments: 1) | Jules117 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding it to the street instead of as separate geometry! I've been doing a lot of this sort of clean-up lately. Please spread the word! commented 2025-08-18 18:16:53 UTC by BPTT ♦87 |
| 170266479 (Comments: 1) | Sebastiaan (Discussed changesets: 3) | It is not appropriate to grade Canadian climbing routes with UIAA grades. We have no idea what UIAA grades or SAC scale grades mean. In Canada we use the Yosemite Decimal System (YDS) for grading. Rating this as UIAA grade 4 will likely be co... commented 2025-08-18 18:10:08 UTC by brendan714 ♦12 |
| 170610588 (Comments: 2) | espressocapital (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170634025 commented 2025-08-18 18:06:46 UTC by iandees ♦729 |
| 170610678 (Comments: 2) | espressocapital (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170634025 commented 2025-08-18 18:06:46 UTC by iandees ♦729 |
| 170577167 (Comments: 4) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 862) | Re 2) The same is true for the definition of a trunk in many countries. That means, a "highway:motorway" tag might be a too narrow scope. I suggest to put this up for discussion in the (global, not US) forums, get some feedback, adap... commented 2025-08-18 17:59:51 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 162667874 (Comments: 2) | LAZACARTO (Discussed changesets: 4) | OK Ok je vous laisse juge de mes contributions, et le plaisir de les corriger ou preciser si vous le souhaitez. Amicalement commented 2025-08-18 17:41:58 UTC by LAZACARTO ♦4 |
| 170373906 (Comments: 3) | AdrienHegy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merci pour l'explication, en effet je n'avais pas remarqué ce cas de la "double section simple" entre deux Z. C'est un joli dilemme, d'un côté des relations plus compliquées pour une informa... commented 2025-08-18 17:27:09 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦151 |
| 170623109 (Comments: 1) | Kratom1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-18 17:19:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 168993587 (Comments: 3) | Quixlian (Discussed changesets: 15) | La fuente que citas (https://www.sct.gob.mx/carreteras/direccion-general-de-servicios-tecnicos/datos-viales/2024/), no indica directamente dónde inicia, solo dice que inicia en México (km 0.0) el siguiente punto T. C. México - Cu... commented 2025-08-18 17:18:25 UTC by ferog_v ♦24 |
| 169255333 (Comments: 4) | moloko67 (Discussed changesets: 5) | hallo kre777, vielen Dank, das werde ich dann entsprechend ändern. Beste Grüße Frank commented 2025-08-18 17:07:31 UTC by moloko67 ♦5 |
| 170406548 (Comments: 1) | Annabel Elizabeth (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Annabel, well done, it's clear to me that you are begining to grasp the concept of correcting a footpritn's position when mapping using imagery captured at an angle. There are a few inaccuracies in this changeset I have mapped these foot... commented 2025-08-18 16:27:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦833 |
| 162097178 (Comments: 6) | mr:spock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Erledigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170626086 commented 2025-08-18 16:25:41 UTC by Hb- ♦303 |
| 169639640 (Comments: 4) | borticus (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Redprintblueprint interesting, thanks for the tip! If you would like, feel free to add it to the map - I'm currently focusing on Flock Safety cameras in my mapping quest, trying to decide how wide I want to cast my net but driving around makes ... commented 2025-08-18 16:24:07 UTC by borticus ♦1 |
| 170132758 (Comments: 4) | ZeLonewolf (Discussed changesets: 148) | 27.7 ft off commented 2025-08-18 16:18:19 UTC by TheNightRider ♦26 |
| 170621003 (Comments: 1) | freemapsman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-08-18 16:13:37 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170614844 (Comments: 1) | jacek roslonek (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-18 16:13:35 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170623368 (Comments: 1) | Jagsz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-18 16:13:32 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170589661 (Comments: 1) | Noha307 (Discussed changesets: 4) | nice details! commented 2025-08-18 16:12:18 UTC by Hans Thompson ♦109 |
| 170603439 (Comments: 1) | Zh9567 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Hi Zh9567, I think a 'hamlet' is a place with just a few houses. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12879284819 is definitely a village. Bye Rene commented 2025-08-18 16:04:38 UTC by rene78 ♦452 |
| 170501575 (Comments: 6) | JoaoPaixao (Discussed changesets: 6) | Entretanto reparei que criste um objecto coicidente com o edifício da igreja e apagaste o edifício que já existia. Referia-me a colocar o place_of_amenity no mesmo edificio da igreja (building=church) commented 2025-08-18 16:03:35 UTC by luisforte ♦132 |
| 170624893 (Comments: 1) | SOSOwner (Discussed changesets: 10) | ...because: https://stephensonsofessex.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/48/2025/08/23-TT-31-8-25.pdf commented 2025-08-18 15:53:10 UTC by SOSOwner ♦10 |
| 170534590 (Comments: 3) | W Craig Coffman (Discussed changesets: 3) | I see that it shows 8th as a bridge as you say & gives me credit for the change. Not sure how I managed that (not intentional). Clearly it is not. commented 2025-08-18 15:44:38 UTC by W Craig Coffman ♦3 |
| 161559392 (Comments: 1) | LivingWithDragons (Discussed changesets: 40) | In this changeset, you added shop=vacant to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9190174887 but left it tagged with healthcare=vaccination_centre . Has the Vaccination Centre closed? If so, the healthcare=* and related tags should be removed. commented 2025-08-18 15:43:41 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦283 |
| 136750939 (Comments: 2) | OrcaDan (Discussed changesets: 20) | That was a data entry error. Thank you for finding it and making the correction. commented 2025-08-18 15:32:24 UTC by OrcaDan ♦14 |
| 169906065 (Comments: 1) | Atanas Angelov (Discussed changesets: 16) | These are not busways. Look at the wiki. Stop vandalising the OSM database. commented 2025-08-18 15:22:16 UTC by DaveF ♦1,573 |
| 170577202 (Comments: 1) | torus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo torus, steht da an den Gebäuden aber wirklich "Ehemaliger ..." dran? Ich hätte vermutlich einfach eher das `old_name` zu `name` geändert und `historic=yes` impliziert ja gewissermaßen etwas "Ehemaliges" commented 2025-08-18 15:21:56 UTC by Harald Hartmann ♦829 |
 | 170619270 (Comments: 1) | Shadidaraa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170622520 commented 2025-08-18 15:06:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169995833 (Comments: 8) | johnysvo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Domluvené `description` jsem revertnul do předchozích stavů: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170620828 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170621449 commented 2025-08-18 14:52:59 UTC by zby-cz ♦13 |
| 159576975 (Comments: 3) | Mister Kanister (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ok, thanks! commented 2025-08-18 14:52:21 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170621449 (Comments: 1) | zby-cz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revertované descriptions - dle domluvy v diskusi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169995833 Dva changesety - minulý - odebírá nově přidané `description` https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170... commented 2025-08-18 14:51:24 UTC by zby-cz ♦13 |
| 170620828 (Comments: 1) | zby-cz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revertované descriptions - dle domluvy v diskusi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169995833 Dva changesety - tento - odebírá nově přidané `description` - následující - revertuje h... commented 2025-08-18 14:50:55 UTC by zby-cz ♦13 |
| 170621085 (Comments: 1) | Shadidaraa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted political vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170621265 commented 2025-08-18 14:43:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 164805516 (Comments: 1) | angys (Discussed changesets: 104) | Hi angys, I noticed you added a ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376686817) in Malaysia. OSM guidelines suggest ferry routes start and end at an amenity=ferry_terminal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). In ... commented 2025-08-18 14:39:44 UTC by aaronq227 ♦11 |
| 170350614 (Comments: 3) | Valenting01 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Oh okay, merci ! :) (Cela dit, comme me l'a fait remarqué @GeorgeKaplan, ça fait peut-être un peu doublon d'avoir deux "public_transport=platform", donc si ça te va je peux adapter les points en "... commented 2025-08-18 14:38:48 UTC by rezemika ♦10 |
 | 169885303 (Comments: 2) | ChristianB77 (Discussed changesets: 11) | also, I'd suggest preserving the ways with tags like 'was:bridge=yes' (and probably check_date=dd/mm/yy) - otherwise it's hard to find the info in the history and, since those bridges are visible on the satellite images, someone m... commented 2025-08-18 14:33:28 UTC by one_half_3544 ♦45 |
| 167547424 (Comments: 2) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello, Please read the comment in your changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170588620 commented 2025-08-18 14:27:57 UTC by MassCartog ♦139 |
 | 170299862 (Comments: 2) | Kayo_33 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi! Thanks for reviewing! I thought I did add the building outline, but alas. Updated in changeset #170620147 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170620147) commented 2025-08-18 14:24:10 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦14 |
| 170046326 (Comments: 3) | marktechratp (Discussed changesets: 4) | Avec plaisir. commented 2025-08-18 14:16:04 UTC by ilias_ ♦229 |
 | 170430528 (Comments: 4) | Hidden Mountain (Discussed changesets: 10) | Тоже почитал разного, понял, что расхождение оценки по этой шкале это нормально. Соглы, тогда тоже буду придерживаться таких же критерие... commented 2025-08-18 14:00:13 UTC by PiroOwl ♦7 |
| 170405294 (Comments: 2) | GerritHoberg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Check this page for the corrections I made. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170618627 Best regards commented 2025-08-18 14:00:13 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170612920 (Comments: 2) | Dan4800 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dobrý den, děkuji za upozornění, příště doplním. commented 2025-08-18 13:57:48 UTC by Dan4800 ♦1 |
| 169970630 (Comments: 9) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 119) | Ja, so ist der "übliche" Weg. commented 2025-08-18 13:55:41 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 170618133 (Comments: 1) | JZ-POW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo. Je kunt een fietsenstalling ook als vlak mappen. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-18 13:49:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170616799 (Comments: 1) | JZ-POW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-18 13:37:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170616470 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 15) | I have create a website on car parking multiplayer mod apk. It's very easy and good game for any player. If you are interested this game so click on this link https://cpmodezone.com/ and download here for PC and IOs commented 2025-08-18 13:36:53 UTC by tabishali ♦1 |
| X | 170569059 (Comments: 1) | Mor000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-18 13:30:52 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦122 |
| X | 170566615 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 862) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-18 13:30:44 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦122 |
| 170561067 (Comments: 1) | Zebl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-18 13:30:24 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦122 |
| 96423761 (Comments: 1) | Martin Witte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Martin, ist zwar schon 4 Jahre her, aber kannst du mir eventuell sagen, um was für ein Denkmaö es sich hier handelt? Und befindet es sich wirklich *in* dem Gebäude? commented 2025-08-18 13:27:28 UTC by wielandb ♦135 |
| 170594722 (Comments: 3) | BlueOceanCost (Discussed changesets: 1) | Se precisan fuentes para el barrio Ambientalista. ¿de donde sale ese nombre? commented 2025-08-18 13:26:24 UTC by muralito ♦2,047 |
| 170170983 (Comments: 4) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 118) | Keine Ursache. Ich freue mich über qualifizierte Nachfragen, weil ich ja doch auch immer mal etwas übersehe. commented 2025-08-18 13:25:39 UTC by Scout Jens ♦280 |
| 170405310 (Comments: 1) | kscx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You often include the shadow next to a building in your mapping. These are no part of a building. Keep that in mind at next mappings. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-18 13:23:23 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170616213 (Comments: 1) | Shadidaraa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi I have reverted this changeset since it broke a lot of boundaries and created wrong entities. Please, be more careful while editing the map. Happy mapping! commented 2025-08-18 13:18:00 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦205 |
| 170605415 (Comments: 1) | zemcoj (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdravím, používajte lepšie komentáre k sadám zmien. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-08-18 13:17:42 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170604338 (Comments: 1) | zemcoj (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdravím, meno cyklotrasy sa dáva len na reláciu cyklotrasy, nie aj na jej členov. commented 2025-08-18 13:16:34 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170535349 (Comments: 1) | martinrepicky (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravím, mtb trasy sa do máp pridávajú pomocou relácií. commented 2025-08-18 13:13:55 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170404181 (Comments: 1) | sal d (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I reviewed your work here as well. Also, many duplicated buildings. Check the bottom line of IDeditor for a message in blue telling how much hidden features there are. Zoom in further to see the buildings Best regards commented 2025-08-18 13:10:52 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170567177 (Comments: 1) | TomasCasnocha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, čo má daný bod reprezentovať? commented 2025-08-18 13:04:38 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170570992 (Comments: 1) | Radovan Semancik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please use this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nudisminstead of name tag. commented 2025-08-18 13:01:41 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170498380 (Comments: 2) | dsaldias (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, si Esam Latam es el grupo corporativo actualmente adquirio UPI la Universidad Politecnica Internacional e ISPI el Instituto Superior Politecnico Internacional La paginal web de esam latam es: https://esamlatam.com/ Categoria d... commented 2025-08-18 13:00:57 UTC by dsaldias ♦2 |
| 170406151 (Comments: 1) | sal d (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. I am afraid that you have a bad start. Sorry to say, but your mappings are not as what we might expect. Issues : building nodes connected to each other. Buildings not squared. Many buildings are duplicated (... commented 2025-08-18 12:54:39 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170498286 (Comments: 2) | dsaldias (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, si la UPI es Universida Politecnica Internacional, IPI ni idea que es :) commented 2025-08-18 12:52:54 UTC by dsaldias ♦2 |
| 170605895 (Comments: 4) | Thorsky24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh, thanks for the information and for your help! Will make some extra modifications, then to explicitly allow it. I see the rules seem to differ for the Netherlands, but since the territory is so close to the border, I guess explicitly stating it�... commented 2025-08-18 12:52:46 UTC by Thorsky24 ♦1 |
| 168005667 (Comments: 5) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | Tak, będzie otagowany ogólnie jako commercial całego terenu. commented 2025-08-18 12:38:38 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,289 |
| 62617564 (Comments: 3) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 108) | OK. Ich bin da erst gewesen und die Fontänen waren nicht in Betrieb. So kamen mir die eingetragenen Punkte willkürlich vor. Nicht böse sein. War nur eine Frage. Grüßle, Jens commented 2025-08-18 12:33:52 UTC by Scout Jens ♦280 |
| 170607113 (Comments: 1) | FrancoisCott (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋😳 commented 2025-08-18 12:33:09 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170397510 (Comments: 4) | jemily1 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Genial! El caso es que, la calle situada al sur de la Plaza del ATS Juan Pamblanco sale marcada como 'Desconocida', pero también me sale marcada cuando busco la Calle de las Fiestas Populares y Tradicionales. Pero tiene sentido lo qu... commented 2025-08-18 12:33:03 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,653 |
| 170612428 (Comments: 1) | Duimstok (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-18 12:27:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170607539 (Comments: 3) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 40) | I understand the issue. However, in the Montreal region and in Quebec in general, we put access tags for new edits and older highways will be updated too as time goes by. commented 2025-08-18 12:25:05 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦382 |
| 170607274 (Comments: 2) | yelisey90 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Yup, and this is described by sidewalk=no tagging. A (theoretical) router may be set to ignore roads with such tagging. But otherwise, people are free to walk on the rightmost lane of the road, keeping close to the side. commented 2025-08-18 12:24:50 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170407938 (Comments: 1) | mkms25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for mapping. I am sorry to say, but these mappings need to be improved. Clustered buildings need to be split into individual buildings. Buildings which does not meet their footprint need to be adjusted. Best regards and keep mappin... commented 2025-08-18 12:24:19 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 168857693 (Comments: 1) | [at]AJYTO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Penutupan jalan setelah stasiun cimekar. Akses hanya untuk penduduk yang kenal kenal aja. 🙄 commented 2025-08-18 12:12:06 UTC by [at]AJYTO ♦5 |
| 170566213 (Comments: 2) | Peats00r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi Eggie, Thanx! Ik ga er eens naar kijken. Ik heb behalve dit restaurant nog verder niets gewijzigd. Ik woon daar in de buurt en wist da het recent is veranderd van eigenaar. En via de sessie op WHY2025 maar op het idee gekomen om dit direct... commented 2025-08-18 12:09:02 UTC by Peats00r ♦1 |
| 168357814 (Comments: 1) | SteveinKY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Steve - unfortunately this edit broke the boundary of Louisville. I was able to fix it, so no action required. The iD (web-based) editor will not warn when a boundary relation is malformed, and so you shouldn't use it for boundary work. commented 2025-08-18 12:07:49 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦566 |
| 163441105 (Comments: 5) | Shohreh (Discussed changesets: 44) | Oui, je vois qu’ils ont été ajouté environ une heure après mon message. commented 2025-08-18 12:05:06 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦8 |
| 169888986 (Comments: 6) | Антон-1983 (Discussed changesets: 51) | А по поводу бел. мовы в name по правилам надо писать именно на ней названия. Тут на карте ещё вроде работает какой-то автоматический перевод... commented 2025-08-18 12:04:51 UTC by HantDX ♦16 |
| 170612705 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 382) | Knotenpunkte der Garagen hatten auch addr:*-Tags commented 2025-08-18 11:58:45 UTC by habi ♦1,869 |
| 170256948 (Comments: 3) | Kiharu1410 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah thanks commented 2025-08-18 11:56:12 UTC by Tewuzij ♦17 |
| 170521635 (Comments: 5) | Ma_sza (Discussed changesets: 1) | got it! commented 2025-08-18 11:46:00 UTC by Ma_sza ♦1 |
| 170602533 (Comments: 1) | HansjMr (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi HansjMr, can you please add proper roles to a relation members of the administration boundaries that you are editing in this area (inner- outer) commented 2025-08-18 11:44:53 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦205 |
| 170608116 (Comments: 4) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 256) | Chciałem wiedzieć z ciekawości, bo domów nie wywalałem. I tak wywaliłeś moje zmiany wtedy. Ja sprawdzam drogi też na Ortofotomapie, a jak są nadane adresy na danej ulicy, to takich ulic nie wywalam. commented 2025-08-18 11:30:40 UTC by theDM ♦119 |
| 170609971 (Comments: 1) | Kochbunker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-08-18 11:21:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170609334 (Comments: 1) | emmattttttt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hiya, did you know you can press the ‘Q’ key when a building is selected, to automatically make its corners square? It can help with drawing accurate building outlines. :) commented 2025-08-18 11:16:09 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 167982611 (Comments: 2) | Антон-1983 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ок. Удалил дубликат. Оставил правильное место commented 2025-08-18 11:00:31 UTC by Антон-1983 ♦33 |
| 170488383 (Comments: 1) | Rekan_20 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-08-18 10:57:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170504338 (Comments: 1) | Yildirim33 (Discussed changesets: 18) | fa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments Please read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-08-18 10:56:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 165203493 (Comments: 3) | vjethro (Discussed changesets: 2) | I was looking around on the new aerial layer. And asked myself, when forest, scrub, grassland, bare_rock, scree, blockfield. If this is tagged, why is that not tagged the same, it looks the same. So I more asked your opinion, because your are locally... commented 2025-08-18 10:53:14 UTC by Allroads ♦427 |
| 95813364 (Comments: 1) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 256) | Masz jakieś info czy ta pętla jest budowana czy to tylko propozycja? commented 2025-08-18 10:52:57 UTC by theDM ♦119 |
| 159672101 (Comments: 2) | Tymeker (Discussed changesets: 17) | Przepraszam, uwaga była po edycji, niemniej DB nie działa od... 2018 roku ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4841854# commented 2025-08-18 10:52:04 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,774 |
| 170516448 (Comments: 1) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 31) | Od 15 grudnia br. będą czynne, ale nie mogłem się już doczekać, więc ustawiłem je wcześniej ;) A stację we Wręczycy zaktualizowałem do dzisiejszego stanu commented 2025-08-18 10:51:24 UTC by RafaBoski ♦9 |
| 170434293 (Comments: 3) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Dezza, thank you very much for getting in touch. Since there isn't a designated entry/exit for the parking area, and the lack of a designated parking aisle with on-the-ground markings, I would say that it wasn't an ideal represe... commented 2025-08-18 10:45:15 UTC by Gorger ♦33 |
| 170268496 (Comments: 2) | ThomasSchweizer (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bedoeld was deze straat in Amsterdam. Naam verwijderd. commented 2025-08-18 10:44:39 UTC by jb54osm ♦181 |
| 170499710 (Comments: 1) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 43) | changeset 1000 commented 2025-08-18 10:44:30 UTC by Tomas09 ♦45 |
| 170608720 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Wg https://spl.pl/deklaracja-dostepnosci/ parking dla pacjentów jest przed ogrodzeniem, więc zgodnie z projektem studium parking za przychodnią jest najprawdopodobniej dla pracowników MON. commented 2025-08-18 10:36:29 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦202 |
| 170598456 (Comments: 1) | Yiyi (itwikipedia) (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-18 10:29:35 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170276891 (Comments: 3) | Mariusz 2M (Discussed changesets: 44) | Super, dzięki commented 2025-08-18 10:29:22 UTC by syntex ♦872 |
| 170293549 (Comments: 2) | indigomc (Discussed changesets: 30) | Morning, sorry about that. Thanks for putting it right. commented 2025-08-18 10:29:03 UTC by indigomc ♦189 |
| 170607472 (Comments: 2) | WinebyPaul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Verwijderd in changeset #170608013 commented 2025-08-18 10:18:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170598151 (Comments: 1) | gio_k5 (Discussed changesets: 0) | mostly reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170607815: the name is assigned to the main road, see https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal commented 2025-08-18 10:16:18 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170598255 (Comments: 1) | gio_k5 (Discussed changesets: 0) | reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170607815: the name is confirmed by https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal commented 2025-08-18 10:15:08 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170607316 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Dodatkowo zmieniłem przy Rokitnickiej w brownfield, gdyż jest oznaczony naocznie jako teren rozbiórki. commented 2025-08-18 10:04:46 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦202 |
| 170505885 (Comments: 1) | surprizpw (Discussed changesets: 1) | rv - there is nothing in laws or signs to prohibit walking on this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170607274 commented 2025-08-18 10:01:50 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170595581 (Comments: 4) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo Negreheb, stimme dir zu, die Erfassung ist zur Zeit ambivalent. Ich sehe nur viele Kartenapps, die die an Straßen-getaggten Sidewalk-Angaben nicht nutzen, während alle die separat erfassten abbilden. Ergo bin ich für eine separa... commented 2025-08-18 09:42:57 UTC by North14 ♦9 |
| 170565749 (Comments: 1) | siwangi02 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please be sure to direct the flow to the river on the east. Ad intermittent as well to the rivers. Best regards commented 2025-08-18 09:36:11 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 142749113 (Comments: 1) | Autopistero20502020 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hola Autopistero20502020: Gracias por tus aportaciones a OpenStreetMap. En las relaciones de ruta de carretera no deben incluirse los enlaces, tal como está recogido en la wiki. " Link roads (highway=*_link) from and to the route. S... commented 2025-08-18 09:31:34 UTC by MarinoBM ♦99 |
| 160489100 (Comments: 1) | Sasank Chaganti (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, I see you added crossings at the intersection of Princess Street and Charles Street as unmarked crossings. As they are obviously signal controlled crossings and marked, I was wondering why you chose to do this. The purpose of this task is suppose... commented 2025-08-18 09:26:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 164944948 (Comments: 2) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 166) | zou zo maar kunnen; ik pas het aan. commented 2025-08-18 09:21:45 UTC by Martin Borsje ♦749 |
| 170576226 (Comments: 1) | noelbov (Discussed changesets: 35) | You can't put the rue du Chapelain on a node with the (bidirectional) chaussée de Bruxelles, because (1) that's simply not where it is and (2) it would imply that you can turn left from the rue du Chapelain into the chaussée d... commented 2025-08-18 09:20:34 UTC by Vollis ♦16 |
| 170382137 (Comments: 2) | __yoshita__ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A few remarks. Please do not collect multiple buildings and tag it as 1 building. Square each rectangular building with the Q key. Solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your work. Bes... commented 2025-08-18 09:15:18 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170364549 (Comments: 1) | madhulikaJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your work. 3 waterway crossings had to be identified and mapped ! Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-18 09:15:07 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170587519 (Comments: 1) | Geoworldconsult (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while it is still selected. Don't ignore the warnings on the issue triangle, and solve them before uploading your mappings. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-18 09:13:49 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 170570650 (Comments: 1) | Rubi Shrestha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not map wood areas. Not part of the project. Your view is limited to your task square, but the wood area covers a much bigger area. Not to be mapped in Ideditor, Now you mapped woodland areas within a ... commented 2025-08-18 09:04:32 UTC by Frans S ♦9,872 |
| 160818923 (Comments: 2) | subham_lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Sharp gift! My name is Shubham and I’m mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. I didn’t notice the ponds earlier—sorry for that. Corrected the issue: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170603588. According to Lyft-owned aeri... commented 2025-08-18 08:59:28 UTC by subham_lyft ♦1 |
| 121992659 (Comments: 1) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 99) | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4901570 ? commented 2025-08-18 08:58:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 141983019 (Comments: 2) | twz123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It is the office of a mobile home care service that is open to customers, e.g. for consultations. commented 2025-08-18 08:58:22 UTC by twz123 ♦4 |
| 170339892 (Comments: 3) | Tossal Redó (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aclaro varias cosas de este conjunto de cambios: - En el tramo de Camino de Borja que empieza por Avenida de Orihuela hasta Camino de la Alcoraya (en el punto en el que el camino gira a la derecha) hay placas con la denominación Calle ... commented 2025-08-18 08:55:33 UTC by jemily1 ♦65 |
| 170484999 (Comments: 4) | GrooveBox (Discussed changesets: 19) | No no, you've done nothing wrong. the NGED project stretches to the east coast and down to Cornwall as well. i'm just focusing on Wales to start with but this last grid has proven to me this process is still too manual and I need to automat... commented 2025-08-18 08:53:52 UTC by kitsee ♦100 |
| 170602537 (Comments: 2) | RobertTXL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adres mooring=yes hersteld https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=haven+oudeschild&objectId=0448020000000001&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=119371.9805198534&geometry.y=561956.88547742&zoomlevel=11.19... commented 2025-08-18 08:53:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170601473 (Comments: 1) | fobar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yep, it seems that it went through this time commented 2025-08-18 08:52:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,897 |
| 170521720 (Comments: 1) | Temur Zoidze (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, please don't use the "name:XX" tags to add transliterations and duplicates of the name of a village in 195 (!) different languages. The tag should be used only if there is an actual name in this language. commented 2025-08-18 08:50:41 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 170603346 (Comments: 1) | wies1 (Discussed changesets: 126) | Fehler bei der Source Angabe Richtig: GWR Swisstopo 2ß25 commented 2025-08-18 08:46:17 UTC by wies1 ♦154 |
| 170587404 (Comments: 1) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo, die Tags an einem "charge_point" sollten keinen "charge_point"-Präfix haben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point Außerdem gibt es keinen "socket:ccs", das wir... commented 2025-08-18 08:44:40 UTC by mueschel ♦6,619 |
| 170585915 (Comments: 1) | Lvcivs_Pavlvs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mapuj w zakresie lokalnym, a nie tak jak tutaj po kilka domków wgłąb paru państw. Dodatkowo pisz normalne opisy zmian, zwłaszcza dla tak dużych obszarów: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian ... commented 2025-08-18 08:42:23 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦202 |
| 170602792 (Comments: 1) | schlesiener (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-08-18 08:41:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170326426 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 17) | Wat hersteld, maar het lijkt onbegonnen werk. natural=water heeft ook de tag waterway meegekregen en overal een wirwar. commented 2025-08-18 08:40:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170326706 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ben hier even bezig geweest om wat te herstellen, maar het is onbegonnen werk. eggie commented 2025-08-18 08:31:03 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 27567597 (Comments: 7) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | I see what you mean but no one will find the memorial in OSM by typing Marian Bublewicz ... You can not expect from people in other country's to type Mariana Bublewicza commented 2025-08-18 08:26:51 UTC by Op'tRad ♦45 |
| 169615859 (Comments: 3) | Gernsheim_85 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Für diese Fahrzeuge sollte allerdings die Gewichtsbeschränkung auf 1.5t ausreichen. :) Vielleicht kannst du den Kollegen den Hinweis geben, dass sie in ihrem Navi/Routingprogramm das einfach entsprechend einstellen sollen, bzw. falls es nic... commented 2025-08-18 08:24:41 UTC by tyr_asd ♦441 |
| 170602059 (Comments: 1) | Kołodziej (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-08-18 08:20:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 158144399 (Comments: 1) | bao luo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Grazie bao luo! Ti segnalo alcune modifiche successive che ho fatto sperando di dare una mano: Forse il nome corretto è semplicemente "Casa dell'acqua" - ho quindi aggiornato per togliere il "- gratuito" ... commented 2025-08-18 08:02:55 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦27 |
| 170561704 (Comments: 1) | Mohammadreza Imanlou (Discussed changesets: 1) | سلام مسیرهای روی نقشه رو خراب کردید. لطفا با دقت ویرایش کنید. commented 2025-08-18 07:54:22 UTC by Hadi Omid ♦50 |
| 170600410 (Comments: 1) | LuanNT2k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sản phẩm và dịch vụ chất lượng, uy tín commented 2025-08-18 07:40:41 UTC by LuanNT2k ♦1 |
| 170585258 (Comments: 2) | ItsEgo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, thank you! Just did this for the sake of time management, but will provide more information on the upcoming adds or changes. Best wishes! commented 2025-08-18 07:31:30 UTC by ItsEgo ♦1 |
| 4932469 (Comments: 2) | Malin (Discussed changesets: 6) | "Vážsky kanál" by mohlo byť skôr v loc_name ako alt_name, ale čo sa mňa týka, nedával by som to tam vôbec. commented 2025-08-18 07:30:02 UTC by Malin ♦5 |
| 12081212 (Comments: 1) | stargoose (Discussed changesets: 2) | Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 170461166 (Comments: 2) | Quixlian (Discussed changesets: 15) | 👋 commented 2025-08-18 07:25:27 UTC by Quixlian ♦18 |
| 170598960 (Comments: 1) | stargoose (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag stargoose. Al die accesstags zijn al default op een paaltje. Ik zal ze verwijderen. access=no en motor_vehicle=no geeft anders problemen. Het is immers een bromfietspad. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-18 07:24:51 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170593340 (Comments: 1) | Andrea Barbera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback BECIS stond al op de kaart. Ik heb één vermelding verwijderd. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Com... commented 2025-08-18 07:20:57 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170586850 (Comments: 1) | Scherpehuys (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Het is beter om de vermeldingen op de gebouwen te plaatsen. Een B@B wordt getagd met tourism=guest_house guest_house=bed_and_breakfast Ik zal de vermeldingen in ieder geval op het gebouw plaatsen. MVG egg... commented 2025-08-18 07:10:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,117 |
| 170595836 (Comments: 1) | yer123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋😳 commented 2025-08-18 07:08:37 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 163965094 (Comments: 3) | Ryccardo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ho trovato le informazioni su https://www.ginabiancheria.com/it/contattaci e corretto l'elemento in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170598767 commented 2025-08-18 07:03:20 UTC by Danysan95 ♦117 |
| 170594679 (Comments: 1) | asoltys (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-18 06:58:01 UTC by Comino ♦120 |
| 170496742 (Comments: 4) | 12pjw34 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for clarifying. The combination of access=no and foot=yes makes sense here. access=yes was not explicitly provided for any of these originally, but perhaps the editor you're using marked it as such by default. commented 2025-08-18 06:57:52 UTC by Lumbercrack ♦3 |
| 170130231 (Comments: 3) | icluf (Discussed changesets: 8) | Super pour les photos, les miennes commencent à dater et je n'ai pas tout trouver à l'époque. Le schéma indique les lames, pas leur orientation par rapport au nord (on pourrait l'ajouter aussi mais &c... commented 2025-08-18 06:52:41 UTC by pyrog ♦357 |
| 170184034 (Comments: 1) | Vegpet (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - deletion of roads servicing other properties https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170598180 commented 2025-08-18 06:48:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 121494537 (Comments: 2) | Fraetech (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, 3GZB and 4GZB are the "names" of the mobile antennas installed for the "New Deal Mobile" program here in France. They mean 3G/4G "Zone Blanche". I used them about two - three years ago, but not since, because they... commented 2025-08-18 06:47:45 UTC by Fraetech ♦2 |
| 170591406 (Comments: 1) | Avery04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You can divide the railway and add a life cycle prefix (my interpretation of pipped off) to the corrected part. Please visit our wiki at osm.wiki with a huge railway section. commented 2025-08-18 06:40:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170591546 (Comments: 1) | Avery04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13076859598. What is the mean of the tag "railway feature" = "Four Mile Run". Please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org with a huge railway section. commented 2025-08-18 06:35:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 112254046 (Comments: 3) | Geofreund1 (Discussed changesets: 141) | schon repariert Gruß Geofreund1 commented 2025-08-18 06:31:28 UTC by Geofreund1 ♦287 |
| 170592015 (Comments: 1) | Muhgellan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4335856113. You change the cuisine value from sandwich to mexican. Have you seen the shop, or is this just a correction based on general knowledge? In the first case, you can also delete... commented 2025-08-18 06:31:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170592265 (Comments: 1) | King Kongin1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your SPAM entry. commented 2025-08-18 06:25:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,731 |
| 170582972 (Comments: 2) | Tsu-Yi Su (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, Noted, thank you for the information. Please invalidate task and I will update accordingly. Thanks again! commented 2025-08-18 06:09:01 UTC by Tsu-Yi Su ♦6 |
| 169721948 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 256) | Dear mapperue, It was just noticed that you recently edited the city of Tatabánya in Hungary for its boundaries. With this changeset (osm.org/changeset/169721948), you accidentally (?) removed the routing attributes of several st... commented 2025-08-18 06:03:57 UTC by osminng ♦15 |
| 170584844 (Comments: 1) | Outdoorrookie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ja, alles dicht gemacht commented 2025-08-18 06:00:32 UTC by lionfish16 ♦1 |
| 170579361 (Comments: 1) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170545203 (Comments: 1) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170545194 (Comments: 3) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170545217 (Comments: 1) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170545275 (Comments: 2) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
| 170577804 (Comments: 1) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,175 |
 | 170334827 (Comments: 3) | silasjelley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great! Thank you for quick response and valuable contributions! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170334827 commented 2025-08-18 05:47:57 UTC by aq123 ♦16 |
| 170327904 (Comments: 2) | yaswanth_d (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi phoenixsaigon1698, Thank you for your message and for highlighting the time-based restriction. However, the time-based restriction is not configured as per the OSM wiki guideline. I made the correction. Please feel free to check. commented 2025-08-18 05:44:30 UTC by yaswanth_d ♦2 |
| 170519616 (Comments: 4) | René1966 (Discussed changesets: 1) | A67-A67 - dank je wel en excuus voor de verwarring commented 2025-08-18 05:44:17 UTC by René1966 ♦1 |
| 170589937 (Comments: 1) | Dr Centerline (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello. In this changeset you appeared to have added the tag building=house to relations 10322762, 12037189, and 2807121, which are train routes between Chicago and New York. I don't think that makes sense so I have deleted those tags in changes... commented 2025-08-18 05:42:23 UTC by jhuang97 ♦12 |
| 170584600 (Comments: 1) | Durifon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut et bienvenue sur OSM ! J'ai bien vu ta contribution et je te propose de l'améliorer. En général on évite d'utiliser la clé `name` pour y coller une description de l'éléme... commented 2025-08-18 05:33:44 UTC by Lejun ♦490 |
| 170592297 (Comments: 1) | GrabSG_SyazwanM (Discussed changesets: 2) | 😳👍 Good, --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170592297 commented 2025-08-18 05:26:42 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 170587458 (Comments: 2) | aryal231105 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170595078 commented 2025-08-18 05:16:38 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,899 |
| 170564945 (Comments: 1) | agaligher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you post a link to the imagery you are using? Your fairway seems a little bit problematic and wildly crosses bunkers (according to more standard sat imagery). Thanks. commented 2025-08-18 04:52:30 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170593529 (Comments: 2) | GrabSG_SyazwanM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Public correction on the presumption paragraph 2: "Thereby, requiring their paid corporate persons to thoroughly apply `restriction=no_u_turn` relations on >> every road intersection <<. Please do feel free to correct my statement.&q... commented 2025-08-18 04:44:45 UTC by buy_osmand ♦112 |
| 169955043 (Comments: 1) | hoanganh2911 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Rất cám ơn bạn đã edit và contribute cho OSM VN. Tuy nhiên để cho việc record và kiểm tra dữ liệu được tốt hơn bạn hãy ghi chú chi tiết hơn những thay đổi đã th... commented 2025-08-18 03:59:27 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170477013 (Comments: 1) | tuanpb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Rất cám ơn bạn đã chỉnh sửa vài changeset đầu tiên cho OSM VN. Bạn hãy vào profile của mình để xem qua hoặc học chỉnh sửa OSM trên learnosm.org nhé. commented 2025-08-18 03:54:30 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170557031 (Comments: 1) | Ngô Đình Hoàng (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rất cảm ơn và trân trọng những đóng góp của bạn cho dữ liệu OSM VN nhưng hãy giúp cộng đồng thêm một bước nữa bằng cách mô tả chi tiết những gì ... commented 2025-08-18 03:45:27 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170588620 (Comments: 1) | ANDREW_K_IN_MA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thanks for leaving a changeset comment. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists... commented 2025-08-18 02:33:54 UTC by MassCartog ♦139 |
| 169614535 (Comments: 3) | Konfarter (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1. brak konkretnych planów w tej materii, co więcej, niedawno RK uzyskał odpowiedź od MI że takie plany nie istnieją, UMWM chciałoby obsługiwać ale samo remontować nie zamierza (https://www.rynek-kolejowy.pl/wiadomosci/mi-bez-konkretn... commented 2025-08-18 01:10:58 UTC by kstdz ♦6 |
| 170183099 (Comments: 4) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 18) | I occasionally check with https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=146.08876&lat=-37.13979&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_node... commented 2025-08-18 01:09:20 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,670 |
| 170568939 (Comments: 1) | Simgames (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170590899 Unsinnige opening_hours, internet_access=wlan wo kein öffentlicher Internetzugang verfügbar ist. Außerdem bitte keine Edits über halb Europa ausbreiten. commented 2025-08-18 00:52:19 UTC by Bienson ♦310 |
| 170542929 (Comments: 1) | spencerguo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Instead of mulch, I think surface=woodchips is the standard tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface. Looks good otherwise commented 2025-08-17 23:56:55 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 170563313 (Comments: 2) | iSenpaiHN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, it is called "Express Coin Laundry" commented 2025-08-17 23:53:13 UTC by iSenpaiHN ♦1 |
| 170423113 (Comments: 3) | Nostradumbass (Discussed changesets: 3) | Might have been an accident, I made a lot of edits to the marina in the last few days and it seems to have slipped through. I plan on visiting the marina again soonish and surveying & verifying all the dispensers/benches/tables/etc, so I might no... commented 2025-08-17 22:57:15 UTC by Nostradumbass ♦2 |
| 170552234 (Comments: 1) | Johann-Nikolaus Andreae (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hiya, this post box is a duplicate of one which is already mapped. I’ve deleted it (in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170589310), but can you please be more careful not to add duplicate stuff to the map? Thanks, and happy editing :) commented 2025-08-17 22:52:45 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 152538190 (Comments: 1) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Find ich erst mal gut, die Rheinallee 88 hier an die Industriefläche zu taggen. osm.org findet damit aber leider nichts unter der Suche nach "rheinallee 88 mainz" das ist nicht so optimal. Ich hab jetzt noch nicht tiefer gesucht, hast ... commented 2025-08-17 22:30:02 UTC by dreua ♦120 |
| 170588379 (Comments: 1) | Łukasz Wasiak (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-08-17 22:11:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 170581745 (Comments: 3) | TheUKHighStreet (Discussed changesets: 17) | Found it. https://uk.representclo.com/pages/represent-retail-store-manchester commented 2025-08-17 22:10:50 UTC by TheUKHighStreet ♦16 |
| 168957968 (Comments: 1) | Parcanman (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi there. I don't think this edit worked the way you hoped it would. The direction of the road should match the way it was drawn. You can reverse it using the right click menu or the "v" key. The way it's currently tagged with one... commented 2025-08-17 22:03:11 UTC by BPTT ♦87 |
| 170588240 (Comments: 1) | Łukasz Wasiak (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-17 22:00:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,275 |
| 148318041 (Comments: 1) | Ewrt1 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170588311 commented 2025-08-17 22:00:44 UTC by Ewrt1 ♦48 |
| 170555588 (Comments: 3) | gmbo (Discussed changesets: 94) | Ich habe wohl im Josm-Fenster etwas hineinkopiert was in den Editor solle. ist herausgelöscht. Vielen Dank für die Aufmerksamkeit. commented 2025-08-17 21:59:50 UTC by gmbo ♦46 |
| 169425316 (Comments: 1) | Aaro Hart (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, living street should be marked by a corresponding traffic sign. By your description I'm not sure if the decision was made based on this information. commented 2025-08-17 21:54:39 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦499 |
| 170582529 (Comments: 2) | muralito (Discussed changesets: 67) | #MOHAMED commented 2025-08-17 21:47:22 UTC by MOHAMEDHAMLV ♦1 |
| 170587819 (Comments: 1) | Jakaka2222 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bron vergeten sorry: Satellietportaal, PDOK luchtfoto, ontwerp commented 2025-08-17 21:43:24 UTC by Jakaka2222 ♦5 |
| 170575416 (Comments: 1) | Pellinger-Hof (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, wozu soll dieser Knoten hier dienen? Er befindet sich innerhalb von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287306110 mit Name "Reitanlage Am Höthkopf". Eigentlich ist es besser, eine Reitanlage nur einmal zu mappen, also nicht gleich... commented 2025-08-17 21:40:03 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦783 |
| 170327595 (Comments: 10) | bdiscoe (Discussed changesets: 55) | There is my list of ~8000 fairways left to fix, but then there is a list of changes that have been made in the last 24 hours that gets generated every day. This secondary list ranges from 0 to 50 course elements to review and is reviewed nightly so t... commented 2025-08-17 21:37:16 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |