| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 180230020 (Comments: 1) | ascending_slugcat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the contributions! Unfortunately, I'm going to have to revert this because part of your change drags Fennell Ave and West 5th St off course, along with some other ways :(. Thanks for taking time out of your day to contribut... commented 2026-03-22 03:50:34 UTC by cswilson252 ♦5 |
 | 149961854 (Comments: 3) | bwbuz (Discussed changesets: 52) | Diese irreführende Angabe ist 2019 ins Wiki gekommen. Wozu die vergangene Beschilderung von der zuletzt durchfahrenden Kreuzung anzeigen? Wichtig ist die nächste Kreuzung. Auf normalen Handybildschirmen verdeckt OsmAnd die Angaben ... commented 2026-03-22 03:42:52 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
 | 179374552 (Comments: 8) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 168) | Adding these names to alt_name=* with name=* being left blank will cause validation errors ("Alternative name without Name"). commented 2026-03-22 03:37:39 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦200 |
| 179060952 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 168) | To connect the tertiary roads at either end of that very specific road segment. commented 2026-03-22 03:36:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦200 |
| 139013563 (Comments: 1) | jake-low (Discussed changesets: 7) | Do you happen to know if it's still open to people walking and biking? If so, I'd like to change it to highway=path. commented 2026-03-22 03:27:51 UTC by pesticides ♦37 |
 | 178330676 (Comments: 1) | Abo3zoz (Discussed changesets: 1) | نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن شخصية / عشوائية / غير صحيحة للخريطة commented 2026-03-22 03:12:52 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦735 |
| 179512970 (Comments: 1) | HAWE30 (Discussed changesets: 1) | نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة commented 2026-03-22 02:55:02 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦735 |
 | 180148763 (Comments: 1) | murattas6 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Sokakların ve caddelerin adını yazarken baş harflerini büyük yazmanız daha iyi olur. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Capitalisation Örneğin "1194. Sokak" şeklinde. İyi günler... commented 2026-03-22 02:53:11 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦233 |
 | 179976028 (Comments: 1) | JEYZAR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180232490 commented 2026-03-22 02:53:06 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
 | 179937934 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Correa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in changeset id:180232443 commented 2026-03-22 02:49:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
 | 180215390 (Comments: 4) | Darnight14 (Discussed changesets: 11) | 刚看了一下高德里面有在门口拍的照片，隐约露出了一块，南北两片假草坪中间夹了几条黄蓝红绿，应该是给幼儿园小孩用的跑道 commented 2026-03-22 02:48:23 UTC by 渤海西岸 ♦33 |
 | 180232376 (Comments: 1) | THAT'S RUFF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-22 02:45:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 177473349 (Comments: 18) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 98) | Yeah, I just mentioned memorial_name=* because it’s in use and matches federal terminology. I forgot that honorary_name=* is more common. But this would all need to be sorted out in a broader discussion, not here. commented 2026-03-22 02:34:04 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦604 |
| 179963600 (Comments: 2) | Journal Square (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180232285 commented 2026-03-22 02:31:21 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179863758 (Comments: 1) | murattas6 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Lütfen gerçek dışı bilgiler eklemeyiniz. Kullandığınız OrganicMaps uygulamasında yer imi oluşturma özelliği mevcut. Parkı kendinize özel bir adla kaydetmek istiyorsanız uygulamanın yer imi özelliğini ... commented 2026-03-22 02:15:52 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦233 |
| 180200848 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180231981 - Keine Fußgängerzone commented 2026-03-22 02:03:26 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180069274 (Comments: 2) | jhaluska80 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks for noticing. I try to map to the best of my abilities. Hopefully it makes for a map people feel confident using and feel good contributing to. commented 2026-03-22 01:39:56 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦96 |
 | 179988131 (Comments: 3) | Viinod (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kotturu is already mapped as neighborhood (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13661030807) Kotturu junction is already mapped ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3984135243) Barma colony is already mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1366... commented 2026-03-22 01:37:21 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
 | 179959358 (Comments: 1) | BLASSTER44 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id:180231701 commented 2026-03-22 01:37:08 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 155556773 (Comments: 2) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 12) | Was trying to find the original way It was copied from when doing land coverage edits in the area. I also found it technically correct, but not a fan of how it was rendered in this use. I have removed the intermittent canal and renamed the grassland... commented 2026-03-22 01:23:12 UTC by j0hn33y ♦15 |
| 180231262 (Comments: 1) | jleedev (Discussed changesets: 23) | Revert of changeset/177083702 commented 2026-03-22 00:56:16 UTC by jleedev ♦303 |
| 177083702 (Comments: 2) | Snare King (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/180231262 commented 2026-03-22 00:56:05 UTC by jleedev ♦303 |
 | 179949100 (Comments: 7) | سامي ايت علي ولحسن (Discussed changesets: 4) | You're selectively reading the wiki. The full quote you keep citing literally says loc_name is for when the local name is "deemed to be too much of a slang name or otherwise unofficial-sounding." "Chari3 Chjar" is a colloquia... commented 2026-03-22 00:55:21 UTC by ilias_ ♦417 |
| 180011018 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 941) | Oh, actually, radiology is part of urgent care, but, that's by the by. commented 2026-03-22 00:55:16 UTC by matthewsheffield ♦19 |
 | 180144523 (Comments: 1) | kost-vic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Зачем добавлять в название родника название деревни? commented 2026-03-22 00:44:19 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,429 |
 | 180231012 (Comments: 1) | anacosstaaalves (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-22 00:39:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
 | 131001117 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥_import (Discussed changesets: 29) | This multipolygon is now fixed. No share segments. I have also combined ways so now only 3 members - reduced data bloat. commented 2026-03-22 00:39:23 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,771 |
| 162489351 (Comments: 1) | Jyrtyps (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, historical railways can be added to OpenHistoricalMap! See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground for more info! :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180230883 commented 2026-03-22 00:26:36 UTC by cswilson252 ♦5 |
| 180230702 (Comments: 1) | ALTRIOSRailGuy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1072195562 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-22 00:20:25 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179266000 (Comments: 2) | kmenard (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have added the ref back as you have not responded with evidence that this is no longer a Florida state road and I my self (along with others I asked for help with this) could not find any such evidence. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-03-22 00:17:16 UTC by Udarian ♦677 |
| 180230412 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 79) | I already fixed the dragged node in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180224885 , that lead to this changeset disconnecting the road and rail lines from the level crossing vertex, I have fixed that in changeset https://www.openstreetm... commented 2026-03-22 00:14:41 UTC by Udarian ♦677 |
| 180220211 (Comments: 1) | StartChat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello welcome to OSM. This feature is not a public road, it is tagged as a private driveway. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground... commented 2026-03-22 00:05:14 UTC by MassCartog ♦335 |
| 180228610 (Comments: 1) | Brandomoney (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/110635845 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of ... commented 2026-03-21 23:59:04 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180227828 (Comments: 1) | Johnny514 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9740292361 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-21 23:59:00 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180223820 (Comments: 3) | MattMillerCR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7165187797 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-21 23:58:56 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 180225479 (Comments: 1) | Johanna Medfors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9842117239 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-21 23:58:55 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180223268 (Comments: 1) | Maria Luiza Nunes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13663746160 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-21 23:58:37 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 180221494 (Comments: 1) | Traxx186 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9186854346 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-21 23:58:30 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180218189 (Comments: 1) | Houderl (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7932343576 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-21 23:57:46 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 180215945 (Comments: 1) | maifeeulasad (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9864362620 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-21 23:57:34 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 176067488 (Comments: 2) | Cro_it (Discussed changesets: 1) | Made both bays into ways and added building=shed. One is just put over a parking space so I just needed to change the parking spaces tag, that was satisfying. commented 2026-03-21 23:50:44 UTC by codywindrose ♦4 |
| 180219619 (Comments: 1) | gmaass (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Georg, wenn du Gehwege an der Straße separat erfasst, musst du die sidewalk-Eigenschaften an der Straße ändern. Aus sidewalk=both wird dann sidewalk=separate, falls du beide Bürgersteige separat als eigene Wege eingetra... commented 2026-03-21 23:47:23 UTC by george1201 ♦290 |
| 180228696 (Comments: 1) | mlysle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10282580757 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-21 23:33:22 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179015806 (Comments: 1) | HoustonBikeGuide (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset moved the whole apartment complex way --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179015806 commented 2026-03-21 23:32:15 UTC by democat ♦26 |
 | 180226659 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 224) | Hola Agus, tengo entendido que el límite del barrio Parque San Martín no es oficial, de todas formas no lo quise eliminar y lo puse en admin_level=14. No estoy de acuerdo en ponerlo como admin_level=9. Que decís de hacer con ello... commented 2026-03-21 23:28:02 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦29 |
 | 151151783 (Comments: 2) | swaree (Discussed changesets: 13) | Fet, gràcies per l'avís Jordi commented 2026-03-21 23:24:36 UTC by swaree ♦12 |
 | 180221836 (Comments: 4) | Hnsptrs (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bedankt, ga proberen er rekening mee te houden.. commented 2026-03-21 23:18:09 UTC by Hnsptrs ♦3 |
| 168903806 (Comments: 1) | Zebralon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Zebralon, bei einem Revert fiel mir dieser Änderungssatz auf. War das ein Test? Auf keinem Luftbild ist dort ein Wohngebiet zu erkennen und lauter gleiche Hausnummern sind auch seltsam. Viele Grüße, Rainer commented 2026-03-21 23:03:35 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
 | 180208007 (Comments: 2) | Bromind (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonsoir, ça doit être l'option que j'ai sélectionner dans streetcomplete, qui ne convient pas pour la France. Il s'agit d'une zone de rencontre. Cordialement, Martin commented 2026-03-21 22:54:26 UTC by Bromind ♦1 |
| 177001559 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180229102 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-21 22:49:06 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
 | 180225845 (Comments: 1) | mapko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Zdravim, ten posun uice Dropia v Petrzalke bude nejaky omyl: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180225845 Revertnem to? commented 2026-03-21 22:40:25 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,819 |
| 168171258 (Comments: 2) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 145) | Danke für korrigieren. Werde es mir merken. commented 2026-03-21 22:39:11 UTC by surveyor54 ♦671 |
| 180227998 (Comments: 2) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hey Udar, Frequency=0 is a wiki documented value for DC power. Tesla Superchargers are all DC EV fast chargers so 0 would apply and be valid. commented 2026-03-21 22:38:43 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦29 |
 | 180227335 (Comments: 1) | ALFIOCIABA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sentiero di spartiacque appenninico si chiama 00 non 300, come mai questa modifica? commented 2026-03-21 22:38:29 UTC by trektor ♦2 |
| 177972560 (Comments: 1) | MAHDY_ALRSHEEDE (Discussed changesets: 2) | نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة commented 2026-03-21 22:38:22 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦735 |
| 177972699 (Comments: 1) | MAHDY_ALRSHEEDE (Discussed changesets: 2) | نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة commented 2026-03-21 22:37:43 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦735 |
| 177020481 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180228702 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-21 22:37:19 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
 | 179419169 (Comments: 1) | MapowiczniAK (Discussed changesets: 9) | Witam, gdzie znalazłeś plany przebiegu tej przeprawy? Można prosić o jakiś link? Sam tego szukałem, ale nie mogłem nic znaleźć. Z góry dzięki. commented 2026-03-21 22:35:04 UTC by Florek89 ♦62 |
 | 180209345 (Comments: 2) | KucseraAnett (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jelenleg nem tudok forrást adni, csak azt tudom hogy minden parádi lakos nagyalmási forrásként ismeri. Béke forrásként valószínűleg azért lett feltüntetve mert a B&eac... commented 2026-03-21 22:29:43 UTC by KucseraAnett ♦1 |
| 180014884 (Comments: 2) | APneunzehn74 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Danke, hab's korrigiert. Und nein ist kein destination, der Platz ist explizit für PKW also motorcar=designated. commented 2026-03-21 22:12:20 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦161 |
| 180225267 (Comments: 2) | skipper6586 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik heb het nu uitgelijnd. Nooit naar de daken kijken. commented 2026-03-21 21:58:41 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180225493 (Comments: 1) | skipper6586 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag skipper, Gebruik allee officiële straatnamen. Dus geen beschrijvingen. Ik heb amenity=parking_entrance toegevoegd op een node. Kijk zelf even of er access=private bij moet. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-21 21:51:16 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177035156 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180227632 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-21 21:48:49 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179360917 (Comments: 1) | Zol87 (Discussed changesets: 71) | i'm confused. aren't the shell chargers actually tesla chargers?? commented 2026-03-21 21:47:32 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 180226510 (Comments: 3) | Apfelchips (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2026-03-21 21:46:02 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
 | 180170865 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 236) | klopt soms ne verkeerde klik sorry commented 2026-03-21 21:42:25 UTC by Jakka ♦1,846 |
| 180159390 (Comments: 2) | Halfix (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, way/300208527 sah für mich aus, als ob die Grünfläche inherent zum Gebäude way/141628101 gehört und damit habe ich sie in das landuse residential integriert – subjektiver Eindruck. way/300208508 war bi... commented 2026-03-21 21:41:07 UTC by Halfix ♦36 |
 | 170053345 (Comments: 1) | seichan1028 (Discussed changesets: 3) | warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway = 8! be careful please, okay? commented 2026-03-21 21:34:36 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦376 |
| 177057853 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180227029 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-21 21:32:37 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180226749 (Comments: 2) | Josblom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adres verwijderd commented 2026-03-21 21:28:02 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180226836 (Comments: 1) | Rehmedis Rehabilitacja Warszawa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-21 21:24:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 174199985 (Comments: 3) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 37) | Naja du kannst dir ja dieses grüne Hinweisschild nochmal genau durchlesen. Ansonsten wäre ich hier einfach bei highway=footway to be honest. Ich finde, dass Radfahrer eigentlich auf einem Friedhof nichts zu suchen haben. Die Friedhofssatzun... commented 2026-03-21 21:23:41 UTC by flex16 ♦70 |
| 171235540 (Comments: 1) | Mégabyze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Attention, ce parking n’a bien que 12 places (six supports) comme c’était marqué avant, pas 24. J’ai corrigé. commented 2026-03-21 21:22:32 UTC by baprischka ♦36 |
| 180218763 (Comments: 2) | Clmclmclm (Discussed changesets: 1) | dans cette partie commented 2026-03-21 21:11:17 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
 | 179495380 (Comments: 4) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 45) | btw, just started mapping supercharger in the north america. I hope I don't fuck it up. :-) commented 2026-03-21 21:10:39 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 180079880 (Comments: 1) | ForestFurnace (Discussed changesets: 38) | Thanks, ForestFurnace! Appreciate your diligent work on the map in the Centre Region. commented 2026-03-21 21:06:58 UTC by mbeyerle ♦48 |
| 179908609 (Comments: 1) | TheIndra (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hoi, review_requested \tyes De tag cycling=pump_track ontbreekt nog... Zie de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycling%3Dpump_track Draw a path way and add: leisure=track cycling=pump_track spo... commented 2026-03-21 21:02:08 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179777077 (Comments: 1) | Krzynio (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hej. W JOSM oraz w innych edytorach, przed wyslaniem zestawu zmian pojawia Ci się okienko gdzie możesz podać opis swoich zmian. Obecne "update data", kßóire dodajesz do każdego zestawu zmian, nie daje żadnej informacji o t... commented 2026-03-21 20:55:13 UTC by SpinOff ♦366 |
 | 176767111 (Comments: 4) | Brían (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vespucci does not seem to have a hotkey to higlight changed/edited objects. (nor does Go Map!! editor) Before uploading changes, entries on the list of the created, changed and deleted elements can be selected and the actual changes inspected.... commented 2026-03-21 20:49:30 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦706 |
| 180221413 (Comments: 4) | Hnsptrs (Discussed changesets: 4) | Paden die niet gekoppeld waren gerepareerd. Landuse overlap bij die samenvoegde percelen gerepareerd. Je zou eens naar editor josm kunnen kijken. Die heeft een goede foutenanalyse bij upload. Je krijgt dan direct een seintje. Gr eggie commented 2026-03-21 20:47:57 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177485211 (Comments: 8) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Es wäre tatsächlich am saubersten die Straßen neu mit erlaubter Quelle zu erfassen. Mapbox zeigt sie ja recht gut. Den Namen muss man vor Ort feststellen. commented 2026-03-21 20:41:03 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179771090 (Comments: 1) | salmSALM (Discussed changesets: 10) | نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة commented 2026-03-21 20:36:10 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦735 |
| 180153645 (Comments: 2) | Noframe (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ich war gestern vor Ort. Bis auf die Bauplätze im NW ist alles fertig. Und es sieht nicht mehr nach Baugebiet aus. Die Nr. 1 wir nächste Woche in ALKIS erscheinen 😀 commented 2026-03-21 20:31:15 UTC by Noframe ♦4 |
| 180213462 (Comments: 1) | limonata (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-21 20:26:58 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179144053 (Comments: 5) | AU5V (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour José, Pour le moment, je n'irai pas au-delà de la suppression que j'ai faite entre Lescoff et la Baie des Trépassés. La suppression que j'ai faite est justifiée pour 2 raisons : 1. i... commented 2026-03-21 20:25:43 UTC by AU5V ♦3 |
| 180101763 (Comments: 4) | faulercycler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke, wir brauchen das, was auf dem Schild beim verlassen des OT Viehstrasse in Richtung Tor steht. Kannst du den beschaffen? Den (Standard) Zustand des Tores dokumentieren wir mit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:open bzw. open:co... commented 2026-03-21 20:15:29 UTC by tux67 ♦2,024 |
| 180184343 (Comments: 4) | MattMillerCR (Discussed changesets: 2) | also why did you remove the amenity, website and phone tags from way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295187753 as that website seems to still be up? Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-03-21 20:15:12 UTC by Udarian ♦677 |
| 180223104 (Comments: 1) | geomaniX (Discussed changesets: 19) | Achherrje... Da wollten wohl meine Finger wohl anders, als mein Kopf. Vielen Dank fürs aufpassen! Sven commented 2026-03-21 20:14:57 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,141 |
| 165187809 (Comments: 16) | ssummoner1 (Discussed changesets: 18) | But also, there is NO reason deleting needed relation at all. commented 2026-03-21 20:10:52 UTC by balint36 ♦231 |
| 180026839 (Comments: 1) | m8324 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt hiervoor. Ik ben aan het kijken want er bestaan enkele onlogische situaties. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489948605 highway=construction zonder construction=* → welke type straat zou dat zijn. Met motor_vehicle=no + bicy... commented 2026-03-21 20:07:58 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 177064998 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180220887 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-21 19:58:33 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
 | 178974700 (Comments: 1) | Yehudah777 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Тег place=suburb лишний и неуместен. И вешать на этот полигон place=neighbourhood тоже не стоит, т.к уже есть точка с этим тегом. Откатил. commented 2026-03-21 19:46:06 UTC by FUZZY_42 ♦30 |
| 179661965 (Comments: 2) | RJ-Gouda (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi lyctkel, Thanks for the feedback! And the resources describing the recommended mapping practises. I will favorite those to refer to when I am adding/updating types of waste collection. Best regards, RJ-Gouda commented 2026-03-21 19:40:12 UTC by RJ-Gouda ♦4 |
| 176632110 (Comments: 2) | fparri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Come si fa in questi casi di solito? Si usa name:pronunciation? commented 2026-03-21 19:39:49 UTC by fparri ♦2 |
 | 180082432 (Comments: 5) | smsm1 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks for the info on the tool, @smsm1! commented 2026-03-21 19:30:11 UTC by IpswichEdits ♦30 |
| 180222880 (Comments: 1) | WaddleIsGood77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please let me know if I added this wrong. I put abandoned=yes so am pretty sure that is correct. commented 2026-03-21 19:29:53 UTC by WaddleIsGood77 ♦2 |
 | 180021267 (Comments: 4) | BakoyeRiver (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, I didn't know about Vantor imagery. In Bucharest we already have imagery from summer 2024 and i think it was the most recent... commented 2026-03-21 19:24:32 UTC by rarad74 ♦441 |
| 180087129 (Comments: 2) | 旧加卷 (Discussed changesets: 9) | 根据我所了解到的情况，是的 4个名称为 Марина 的POI同时指向“玛丽娜宾馆” 有多家名称为 Марина 的咖啡店实际上不存在 node/4324240608 node/3062724707实为餐厅 存在两个名... commented 2026-03-21 19:13:05 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦38 |
| 179725793 (Comments: 2) | Patrick Harper (Discussed changesets: 11) | I've reverted all changes to the Mancunian Way following community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-we-prioritise-official-truth/142448 Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180221456 commented 2026-03-21 19:02:08 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
| 172486764 (Comments: 1) | keesm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Volgens: https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.76572,5.356420,18/?datastrip=20260302_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO lijkt gebouw: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Zandstraat%2C+kerkdriel&objectId=02631000000... commented 2026-03-21 18:56:14 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦48 |
 | 180030161 (Comments: 2) | AngelB (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks commented 2026-03-21 18:47:19 UTC by AngelB ♦3 |
| 87097282 (Comments: 2) | ivan calamelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | si. esiste. ciao commented 2026-03-21 18:46:01 UTC by ivan calamelli ♦1 |
| 180118966 (Comments: 3) | karkor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke commented 2026-03-21 18:44:59 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 180173784 (Comments: 2) | The Invisible Freak (Discussed changesets: 14) | OK, ich habe die zugehörigen Pfarren ergänzt commented 2026-03-21 18:42:36 UTC by The Invisible Freak ♦13 |
 | 173977326 (Comments: 2) | AE35 (Discussed changesets: 60) | Sure - please remove when you know this path is not there anymore. best regards commented 2026-03-21 18:41:52 UTC by AE35 ♦46 |
| 180218377 (Comments: 2) | Kairos masajes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, Kairós Masajes. Gracias por los cambios. Las descripciones en OSM deben ser neutras, no promocionales (corregido): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising He añadido una etiqueta &la... commented 2026-03-21 18:38:28 UTC by dcapillae ♦397 |
 | 180104515 (Comments: 2) | Yuri Melnik (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thank you for review. At this street they changed the roundabout to u-turns traffic lights and moved the pedestrian crossing to new traffic light as well commented 2026-03-21 18:37:07 UTC by Yuri Melnik ♦1 |
| 180132078 (Comments: 2) | Layft Greater (Discussed changesets: 61) | yes intentional sorry cannot split in the app by location commented 2026-03-21 18:34:27 UTC by Layft Greater ♦187 |
| 180183076 (Comments: 2) | WaddleIsGood77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you! I’m new to OSM, have only made a couple edits but I’m traveling here and wanted to fix up the map a bit. Thanks for the tip! commented 2026-03-21 18:31:19 UTC by WaddleIsGood77 ♦2 |
 | 180204031 (Comments: 2) | Boyan Alexiev (Discussed changesets: 32) | Обединих ги. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180220469 commented 2026-03-21 18:20:15 UTC by Fraxi ♦292 |
| 179922367 (Comments: 3) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi BrummsLee, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-03-21 18:19:42 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
 | 179985469 (Comments: 3) | borovac (Discussed changesets: 68) | Hi borovac, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-03-21 18:19:03 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 180050508 (Comments: 2) | Przemysław Borys (Discussed changesets: 5) | to nie jest czasem ogólny opis korytarza którym się idzie raczej niż konkretna ścieżka? commented 2026-03-21 18:16:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 178321550 (Comments: 1) | Przemysław Borys (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475645947/history w jaki sposób ta trasa jest wyznaczone lub widoczna w terenie? commented 2026-03-21 18:15:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180053853 (Comments: 2) | Przemysław Borys (Discussed changesets: 5) | dodatkowo, name= jest na nazwę nie opis commented 2026-03-21 18:14:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180179875 (Comments: 3) | sa62 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Така е улицата трябва да се намести в близкото бъдеще. Просто ми се искаше да потвърдиш, понеже си бил там. Благодаря! commented 2026-03-21 18:14:17 UTC by Fraxi ♦292 |
| 178760347 (Comments: 3) | Przemysław Borys (Discussed changesets: 5) | 1) czy tam jest jakkolwiek ścieżka? pewnie nie i to co najwyżej jest highway=no 2) jaka licencja tego źródła danych jest 3) czy to jest konkretna trasa czy jakiś ogólny przybliżony korytarz ? commented 2026-03-21 18:13:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180116547 (Comments: 2) | AgathaS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! Wow, that's a large number, but I'm not sure about that. What I did initially was map the delimited area by adding paths and then, later, I revised it. So it's possible I deleted some paths I added earlier because they weren't... commented 2026-03-21 18:10:31 UTC by AgathaS ♦1 |
| 179957841 (Comments: 3) | Patrick Harper (Discussed changesets: 11) | Agreed, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180220049. Thanks @kitsee for the source commented 2026-03-21 18:06:25 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
| 167319090 (Comments: 2) | LarsBG (Discussed changesets: 71) | Enig det var lige gået hurtig nok. Jeg har tilføjet lidt flere detaljer commented 2026-03-21 18:06:17 UTC by LarsBG ♦81 |
| 179747050 (Comments: 3) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 121) | Die fragliche Kachel: https://opendata.lgln.niedersachsen.de/doorman/noauth/alkis_wms?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=FALSE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=ALKIS&STYLES=&CRS=EPSG:3857&WIDTH=1024&HEIGHT... commented 2026-03-21 18:05:37 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 180214236 (Comments: 1) | Simon Salmon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Simon. Probeer als het kan op de adresnode bij te taggen. Nu is het adres ook incompleet. Gr eggie commented 2026-03-21 18:03:21 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179805865 (Comments: 3) | trigpoint (Discussed changesets: 76) | Makes sense, thanks 👍 commented 2026-03-21 18:03:05 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
| 180214358 (Comments: 1) | Mark Open (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi.. ..parking=lane sta je op de hoofdrijbaan. Dat is hier niet het geval. Bij parkeervakken tag je naast amenity=parking.. parking=street_side orientation=parallel Groet, eggie commented 2026-03-21 18:01:19 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180135471 (Comments: 2) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thanks, fixed now, with an obvious typo such as this you are welcome to go ahead and make the correction yourself commented 2026-03-21 18:00:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
 | 180178647 (Comments: 1) | thopf (Discussed changesets: 27) | Achtung hier gibt es ein Problem nach dieser Änderung mit dem Routing nördlich der Korrektur Höhe Dr. Heschl-Weg stadtauswärts bis Webling Verteilerkreis. Hier wird nicht über Kärntnerstraße geroutet. Bitte kontrol... commented 2026-03-21 18:00:16 UTC by Erwin Wailland ♦1 |
| 180166961 (Comments: 5) | PWeder (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag Pauliine, Het fietspad had ik al aangepast. Groet, eggie commented 2026-03-21 17:42:42 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180076123 (Comments: 3) | Robin van der Linde (Discussed changesets: 33) | Heb het nu gecorrigeerd, hadden niet aan de weg gesnapt moeten zijn. commented 2026-03-21 17:41:08 UTC by Robin van der Linde ♦13 |
| 180218734 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1_repair (Discussed changesets: 6) | Scusatemi per il big cs, lo so, stavo provando a caricare solamente firenze... e invece... scusatemi per il big cs ragazzi SORRY FOR THE BIG CHANGESET commented 2026-03-21 17:35:43 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦182 |
| 180131421 (Comments: 2) | ivanruiz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Buenas, sí se ha tratado de un error, en la próxima edición lo corrijo. Muchas gracias y un saludo. commented 2026-03-21 17:35:11 UTC by ivanruiz ♦2 |
| 172527864 (Comments: 2) | Team Baumpartner (Discussed changesets: 1) | gerne kann man uns auch eine E-Mail senden: info@baumpartner.at commented 2026-03-21 17:33:48 UTC by Team Baumpartner ♦1 |
| 180213553 (Comments: 2) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=* Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry. commented 2026-03-21 17:33:30 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180213410 (Comments: 2) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=* Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry. commented 2026-03-21 17:33:30 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179818607 (Comments: 2) | Damaris Royalty Realtor at Keller Williams Gulfport (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218650 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179812818 (Comments: 2) | Dr Jroundi Hatim (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218646 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179805250 (Comments: 2) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | 👍 Thank you for removing the text by https://osm.org/changeset/179806186 commented 2026-03-21 17:33:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179806053 (Comments: 2) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/180058291 commented 2026-03-21 17:33:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179805182 (Comments: 2) | reaperdoder (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179810512 commented 2026-03-21 17:33:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179802187 (Comments: 2) | Kylllly (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179802655 commented 2026-03-21 17:33:17 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179801612 (Comments: 2) | itsystemsconsulting (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218641 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179800803 (Comments: 2) | Lago Laura (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218638 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179794720 (Comments: 2) | Wendy Williams-Lacour: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218636 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179791863 (Comments: 2) | EnergyLink International (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218631 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179791733 (Comments: 2) | VijayRaghavendraT (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218629 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179791640 (Comments: 2) | selectautogreenville (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218626 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
 | 180079791 (Comments: 6) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 145) | Tam w krzakach jest stara tarcza manewrowa od bocznicy (odcięta od sieci) z tego co wiem xd Natomiast jeśli już się zabierzesz za aktualizację stacji w tym rejonie, to zachęcam do skorzystania z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Ope... commented 2026-03-21 17:32:13 UTC by Anas masuris ♦170 |
| 180181694 (Comments: 4) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Nevermind, I see that there are 916 or so. Removed. Hopefully solved commented 2026-03-21 17:30:48 UTC by I-76 ♦62 |
| 180116496 (Comments: 4) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 162) | Hi, thanks for that, next time I will change the visibility together with reporting it to you. V commented 2026-03-21 17:29:35 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦240 |
| 176214506 (Comments: 5) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 145) | Zmieniłem na "Muzeum Inżynierii i Techniki". Jeśli jeszcze będzie coś do skorygowania, to piszcie :) commented 2026-03-21 17:28:15 UTC by Anas masuris ♦170 |
| 180087462 (Comments: 3) | 309_308_307 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Danke für den Verweis zur Seite. Gut zu wissen, dass der Weg zur Zeit gesperrt ist, dann meide ich die Strecke bis Mai. commented 2026-03-21 17:26:05 UTC by Lokai ♦495 |
| 180116610 (Comments: 2) | Badojo (Discussed changesets: 120) | netko je već ucrtao prije (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178982531) pa sam pretpostavio da je to točno. Ja sam sredio ref tagove i relacije pa ae lagano doda access=no ako nije otvoreno commented 2026-03-21 17:24:18 UTC by Badojo ♦160 |
| 177153385 (Comments: 2) | Vi2727 (Discussed changesets: 4) | @Lostmonkey Hej jeg satte den som turistattraktion fordi man kunne booke det til at komme ud til fårene til nogle arrangementer men burde havde ændret det nu. commented 2026-03-21 17:20:44 UTC by Vi2727 ♦2 |
| 179885156 (Comments: 2) | Krzysztof Ćwiok (Discussed changesets: 1) | @kubahahaha dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi, poprawiłem daj znać czy jest ok bo jestem tu nowy w poprawianie mapy. commented 2026-03-21 17:19:51 UTC by Krzysztof Ćwiok ♦1 |
| 135421660 (Comments: 2) | Plaintelive (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ciao, ho corretto i tag Grazie commented 2026-03-21 17:18:47 UTC by Plaintelive ♦7 |
| 179916384 (Comments: 2) | loser1k (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I believe that you're correct, I wasn't aware of the correct procedure for paths/roadways that are now inaccessible. commented 2026-03-21 17:18:26 UTC by loser1k ♦1 |
| 179982755 (Comments: 3) | Ryzren (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi denke schon, dass das möglich ist. Im Wiki darf jeder Dinge ändern ;) commented 2026-03-21 17:08:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 61889419 (Comments: 2) | Mannivu (Discussed changesets: 44) | Ops, colossale svista commented 2026-03-21 17:07:58 UTC by Mannivu ♦260 |
| 180025575 (Comments: 2) | st3phan76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo "Urk" :) Besten Dank für den Tipp. Das ist gut zu wissen, dass es so rum besser ist. ThX commented 2026-03-21 17:07:37 UTC by st3phan76 ♦1 |
| 180154660 (Comments: 2) | Flynn_ (Discussed changesets: 40) | Thanks! commented 2026-03-21 17:06:29 UTC by Flynn_ ♦9 |
| 179903840 (Comments: 2) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 168) | We gaan eens kijken; weet niet wat er gebeurd is. commented 2026-03-21 17:05:53 UTC by Martin Borsje ♦753 |
| 180207931 (Comments: 1) | mapmanMUC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the improvements, what does the tag "footway"="footway" mean? Cheers commented 2026-03-21 17:04:27 UTC by aTarom ♦919 |
| 180215166 (Comments: 1) | einnutzer72 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hallo, ich habe Fragen/Anmerkungen: - Wieso hast du die Sirene gelöscht? - Wo hast du den Import bzw. die Massenbearbeitung der Mobilfunkantennen angekündigt? - Die Aufnahme der Standortbescheinigungsnummer und der Frequenz in &... commented 2026-03-21 16:57:43 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
 | 161653414 (Comments: 1) | xorly (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravím, doplňoval jsem nějaké chybějící informace v okolí a všiml si tohoto chodníku - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353507593 Chtěl bych se zeptat na základě jakých info... commented 2026-03-21 16:47:21 UTC by MakroCZ ♦1 |
| 180200947 (Comments: 1) | Znaika (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo, so richtig konsequent ist es nicht, nur die Hausnummer auf "was:" zu setzen. Zumal die Adresse (inkl. Hausnummer) offiziell ohnehin am Grundstück hängen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-21 16:46:39 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
 | 180206411 (Comments: 4) | engri (Discussed changesets: 2) | engri, por favor, cuando haga cambios intente separar registros nuevos, de eliminados y de editados, así es más fácil evaluar y no perder cambios utiles --- Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2026-03-21 16:35:49 UTC by Lenny Andreu ♦15 |
| 180141230 (Comments: 2) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi A67-A67, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-03-21 16:35:25 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 180212794 (Comments: 1) | Vital1957 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Vital1957 From the aerial imagery the building I just added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491271953) does *not* look like a church/chapel. I thus removed this tag. Please leave a comment here and cite a source it it's rea... commented 2026-03-21 16:30:23 UTC by habi ♦2,059 |
| 180191179 (Comments: 2) | davras (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20033 commented 2026-03-21 16:16:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 177107804 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180212964 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-21 15:33:42 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180193626 (Comments: 1) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 36) | The building you added near the station of Carpi has been completely demolished, so I'm going to remove it --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180193626 commented 2026-03-21 15:22:45 UTC by balle0 ♦1 |
 | 174391574 (Comments: 4) | jVF5nUXy6w (Discussed changesets: 3) | @Duja, @jVF5nUXy6w Thanks for the clarification regarding the sign. However, I would like to propose the removal of the name 'Acin čot' from the name tag. Historically, this peak has always been nameless (an elevation point only)... commented 2026-03-21 15:01:01 UTC by mmns ♦10 |
| 179489434 (Comments: 2) | Andy Krosta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unsinn entsorgt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180211479 Das Areal ist abgesperrt und nocht öffentlich zugänglich. commented 2026-03-21 14:54:43 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,141 |
| 180210531 (Comments: 1) | Steven Splinter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7868937921, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7868937926 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move th... commented 2026-03-21 14:45:42 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179735011 (Comments: 1) | Peppek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die Straße heißt im östlichen Teil "Im Winkel", genauso wie in den Adressen der nebenstehenden Häuser. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=598727117917211&focus=photo , erledigt mit changeset/180210642 c18021064... commented 2026-03-21 14:33:56 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 180210091 (Comments: 1) | kiritimati_c7g (Discussed changesets: 6) | *fix traffic signals and cneter triskett rd commented 2026-03-21 14:20:45 UTC by kiritimati_c7g ♦6 |
| 180208747 (Comments: 1) | montemartello (Discussed changesets: 1) | Attenzione,hai cancellato informazioni. commented 2026-03-21 14:15:51 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦342 |
| 180207743 (Comments: 1) | wouternieuwerth (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dag Wouter, review_requested \tyes Lijkt me oke. Soms het het wel handig om eerst disused:highway=track te mappen ipv te verwijderen omdat anders medemappers het weer gaan intekenen. disused gebruiken voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. MVG |
| 180044732 (Comments: 1) | Tonytaotao (Discussed changesets: 1) | 请勿把区域标成建筑 commented 2026-03-21 14:01:30 UTC by Taksine ♦152 |
| 180207059 (Comments: 2) | JET Pimentel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Además, Zenteno Puede ser por el militar (José Ignacio). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180207059 commented 2026-03-21 13:56:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
 | 178517680 (Comments: 2) | OSM-VTYMRP (Discussed changesets: 9) | Poistin näistä ref=* tagit (kun kävin näitä muutenkin suomesta läpi) Tässä on myös yhdellä tiellä lanes=1.75, josta JOSM validaattori herjasi. Kaistamäärän pitäisi olla... commented 2026-03-21 13:40:16 UTC by Sakari_N ♦124 |
| 179103131 (Comments: 5) | fedc (Discussed changesets: 142) | Ciao fedc, Sembra proprio che tu abbia ridisegnato https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27316986/history come https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483538254. Sarebbe meglio se potessi mantenere la cronologia. Cordiali saluti, Andy commented 2026-03-21 13:34:27 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,696 |
| 176668257 (Comments: 1) | tungstentt (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, I see you changed my ref=* -> unsigned_ref* changes back to ref=*. I changed them again the ref=* to unsigned_ref* according to the finnish community discussion about the topic: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ref-tunniste-ns-... commented 2026-03-21 13:30:28 UTC by Sakari_N ♦124 |
| 180152939 (Comments: 1) | gmbo (Discussed changesets: 98) | Da werden sich sicher eine Menge Leute darauf stürzen, das gerade zu biegen: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.22685&lat=51.47735&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=intersectio... commented 2026-03-21 13:13:48 UTC by kartler175 ♦574 |
| 180028812 (Comments: 1) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello, Looking at the Kingfisher Way in Arlesey http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1494247 it's still not clear whether it uses the road parallel to the A507 or the footpath? Best Regards, Andy commented 2026-03-21 13:10:52 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,696 |
| 180199275 (Comments: 1) | Gayatri pillay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11333081223 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-21 13:04:03 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180195049 (Comments: 1) | hollobon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this. commented 2026-03-21 12:52:58 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| 180198147 (Comments: 1) | 5SH0eB5AA9yjZWZHprk7a571yYk149 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why have you deleted these tags? What is your source? Also, please write a meaningful changeset comment - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-03-21 12:51:03 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| 180198727 (Comments: 1) | 5SH0eB5AA9yjZWZHprk7a571yYk149 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why have you deleted the address tags from these objects without explanation? What is your source for this? Also, please write a meaningful changeset comment - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-03-21 12:49:20 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| 180151929 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 73) | Hello, I have noticed that you've lately been editing in Sweden, Norway and Russia but using Finnish changeset comments. This is discouraged, and instead use comments preferably in English. Also, don't use the same changeset coment every ti... commented 2026-03-21 12:47:00 UTC by themapper53 ♦7 |
| 180200377 (Comments: 1) | Xeroctic (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've replaced the amenity=retail tag with building:use=retail as this is the documented tag for the current function of a building originally built as something else. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180206469 commented 2026-03-21 12:46:06 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| 178544661 (Comments: 2) | Abdullah Abdulrhman (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello, While cleaning up the edits made by the user KHALIDALOMRI, I merged some road segments, including this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465488963/history The tag traffic_calming = 10 was already present on one of the se... commented 2026-03-21 12:39:45 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦735 |
| 180016436 (Comments: 1) | Heikki Kerppilä (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moi, Jos tiennumeroa ei ole merkitty maastoon (tai se on merkitty niin heikosti että sitä ei voi pitää navigointiin kelvollisena), kuuluisi käyttää unsigned_ref=* tagia ref=* tagin sijaan. Keskustelua ... commented 2026-03-21 12:35:24 UTC by Sakari_N ♦124 |
| 180046974 (Comments: 2) | 一鸣 张 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 你好，张一鸣同学，感谢你来到OSM，但是似乎其中有一些用地是否适合现在画到OSM，需要一定讨论，不一定合适，比如你在流亭机场航站楼旁边画的一个商业金融用地或者是预定的公园绿地... commented 2026-03-21 12:12:26 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦584 |
| 179026836 (Comments: 1) | giadamantione (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao, ti scrivo perché avevi aggiunto (probabilmente per errore) alcuni elementi inesistenti, tra cui questo percorso pedonale: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482821467. Per intenderci, avevi collegato il livello in trincea dell'ingre... commented 2026-03-21 12:09:42 UTC by Busaiolis ♦14 |
| 180063620 (Comments: 1) | Mike Steglich (Discussed changesets: 4) | foot=customers wäre besser. access=customers würde theoretisch alle Verkehrsarten für die Kunden zulassen. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180063620 ... commented 2026-03-21 12:05:09 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 180010632 (Comments: 1) | swmhlea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Du hast hier die Baustelle "Sauerlacher Straße" in Deisenhofen wieder als highway=residential (statt construction) und auch die Straßenbegleitenden Fußwege als nutzbar hinterlassen. Die sind alle bis Ende Nov... commented 2026-03-21 12:03:51 UTC by ToniE ♦1,256 |
| 175631341 (Comments: 1) | Phantastic! Mapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, Disiento con los polígonos de "brownfield que has puesto alrededor de esta área de La Almozara" en especial los que has colado en torno a etopia. Creo que habría que eliminarlos y revisar los del entorno. &ique... commented 2026-03-21 11:57:00 UTC by msevilla00 ♦146 |
| 180203639 (Comments: 1) | slovak_scouser (Discussed changesets: 9) | landuse, parking spaces, entrances, details (i accidentally uploaded the changeset with no comment) commented 2026-03-21 11:55:37 UTC by slovak_scouser ♦1 |
| 180201025 (Comments: 2) | Abelinoss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gezien. Dankjewel! commented 2026-03-21 11:50:03 UTC by Abelinoss ♦1 |
| 180203308 (Comments: 1) | Vibha_Lakra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Vibha_Lakra, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 landuse(s) - 1 natural(s) Could you p... commented 2026-03-21 11:48:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 174552788 (Comments: 1) | Bierphysik (Discussed changesets: 23) | Das oneway=yes bezog sich auf die Radfahrer, nicht die Fußgänger. Also bitte nicht löschen, sondern, wenn überhaupt, dann oneway:bicycle=yes VG commented 2026-03-21 11:43:27 UTC by limes11 ♦1,020 |
| 180176417 (Comments: 4) | DWacht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, habe es angepasst, da ich den Feldweg kenne. Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-21 11:36:56 UTC by limes11 ♦1,020 |
| 180202338 (Comments: 1) | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 (Discussed changesets: 185) | 另外一提，simple_revert 应该是没法用了不然我也不至于这么去用 https://imgur.com/a/5aeharp commented 2026-03-21 11:33:45 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦584 |
| 180047541 (Comments: 2) | hhh777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 朋友你好，你似乎不小心把一个点拖到其他位置去了，你需要注意一下以后在编辑中的时候注意放大了以后确定自己的鼠标左键没有拖动什么东西，或者说这种事情保存的时候一般都会有很... commented 2026-03-21 11:30:30 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦584 |
| 178802592 (Comments: 1) | Shreyas Bharule (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1481028148/history has building = 78 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2026-03-21 11:26:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 175773922 (Comments: 1) | lapsly (Discussed changesets: 2) | Local knowledge here, this one is present on G Street view but it is not located here anymore. I suspect it is the one facing SSE down Mathis Rd, which is not visible on G Street view. commented 2026-03-21 11:10:24 UTC by Keith_Op ♦3 |
| 178969581 (Comments: 1) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 22) | Thanks for the update! I did further update it, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ik-zie-in-steden-steeds-meer-autoluwe-gebieden-ontstaan-en-of-uitbreiden-hoe-dit-structureel-in-osm-oppakken/142438/19 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2026-03-21 11:07:18 UTC by emvee ♦399 |
| 177148952 (Comments: 2) | Katarina Hermannova (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also please quote the source of your data in each changeset, using the 'source' tag on the changeset or each added object. commented 2026-03-21 11:02:03 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,819 |
| 180179372 (Comments: 1) | Oberlausitzer42 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo Oberlausitzer42! Würdest du die Bearbeitungen nun bitte endlich einmal so lassen, wie sie waren? Dein "Haus Stille (unbewohnt)" hatte ich schon in die Beschreibung verschoben. Da ist es gut aufgehoben. Ansonsten kommt in Na... commented 2026-03-21 10:47:06 UTC by BrummsLee ♦41 |
| 180168625 (Comments: 2) | grelang (Discussed changesets: 9) | Das stimmt.nich nachvollziehbar warum das jemand macht. Zumal auch noch ohne conditional tagging. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions Einmal vergessen upzudaten oder gegen den Baum gefahren und der weg ist über mo... commented 2026-03-21 10:40:53 UTC by tux67 ♦2,024 |
| 180175039 (Comments: 1) | Christoph Lotz (Discussed changesets: 47) | Thanks! commented 2026-03-21 10:38:20 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,819 |
| 180171064 (Comments: 1) | sipoye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, this changeset removes a large number of multilingual name tags (name:ru, name:pl, and in some cases even name:uk) across many objects. Could you please explain: - What source or guideline was used for these deletions? - Wh... commented 2026-03-21 10:05:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 180189569 (Comments: 1) | vergissmiNET (Discussed changesets: 2) | danke!!! commented 2026-03-21 10:04:34 UTC by kuhni74 ♦428 |
| 142995153 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 137) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180171064 commented 2026-03-21 10:03:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 180139675 (Comments: 1) | Alex Burbon (Discussed changesets: 1) | не вся территория представляет собой строительную площадку, слишком грубо отметили. Откачу в этой части commented 2026-03-21 10:02:06 UTC by literan ♦7,027 |
| 180144283 (Comments: 1) | Ozon_OSM11 (Discussed changesets: 5) | зачем вы отрисовываете кусок крыши давно снесенного здания? commented 2026-03-21 10:00:56 UTC by literan ♦7,027 |
 | 179626752 (Comments: 5) | Nelson Mwova (Discussed changesets: 1) | I can't see any change on the objects added by this project for the past week. I also didn't get any response from any of the other mappers involved in the project. Could you forward this to the other team members and make them awa... commented 2026-03-21 09:55:19 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 180172784 (Comments: 2) | Damian3456 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Przypadkowo, już dodałem. commented 2026-03-21 09:48:18 UTC by Damian3456 ♦1 |
| 180196049 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 141) | + modele 3D commented 2026-03-21 09:47:53 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦388 |
| 180167112 (Comments: 1) | CENTRALHUB (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi, I found a strange "osmsync = yes" tag on 50 rivers. Was this added by mistake? commented 2026-03-21 09:45:44 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 180168907 (Comments: 1) | grelang (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo, das widerspricht der Zeitungsmeldung unter https://www.aachener-zeitung.de/lokales/region-aachen/simmerath/b266-ist-jetzt-von-seifenauel-bis-roesberg-gesperrt/142233618.html und dieser Meldung: https://www.aseag.de/aktuelles/detail/aktuelle... commented 2026-03-21 09:42:52 UTC by aixbrick ♦894 |
| 180146604 (Comments: 1) | improperaffo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please, stop removing OSM objects, if you don't know their purpose and/or function. PTv2 asks for a platform and a stop position, it's not PTv1. Thank you. commented 2026-03-21 09:42:34 UTC by d_berger ♦193 |
| 180168476 (Comments: 1) | M-NCPPC_Import (Discussed changesets: 29) | This import went wrong. All the objects contain many tags that shouldn't appear in OSM like "ROOF_TYPE". Height of buildings with nanometer precision are also pretty useless. This should be reverted and redone following all of the I... commented 2026-03-21 09:40:33 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 180153795 (Comments: 3) | DwarfNebula_ (Discussed changesets: 27) | b. Die outers zijn het voetgangersgebied. Zal allemaal niet met jouw edits van doen hebben. commented 2026-03-21 09:39:24 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180170563 (Comments: 1) | Serj40in (Discussed changesets: 1) | зачем вы удаляете инфу о соцсетях компании, таких как VK, instagram? это вандализм commented 2026-03-21 09:30:08 UTC by literan ♦7,027 |
| 180163033 (Comments: 1) | Spixi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Warum? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes Der nächste der das anpackt bekommt eine (unnötige) validator warnung und die Info das es keinen namen gibt ist verloren .. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA<... commented 2026-03-21 09:09:30 UTC by tux67 ♦2,024 |
 | 180100103 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoinplett (Discussed changesets: 5) | A mobile car wash somewhere on a lawn/park is not allowed on OSM. Please delete the POI. commented 2026-03-21 09:08:52 UTC by Comino ♦323 |
| 180181997 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hi, thanks for adding detail here, but you seem to have added several duplicate phone numbers that were already mapped using the contact: scheme e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10553314712 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266493096 ... commented 2026-03-21 08:54:25 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦364 |
| 134429551 (Comments: 1) | frekfrekfrek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, inutile de faire un truc compliqué comme ceci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15674677#map=19/48.359050/-4.563864 Un parking comporte les voies dédiées au parking comme vous l'avez partiellement fait. Un... commented 2026-03-21 08:16:04 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 177511938 (Comments: 7) | Ekaterina Nov G (Discussed changesets: 4) | The geometry is fixed but the hotel tags are back, you'll want to delete those commented 2026-03-21 08:11:04 UTC by tguen ♦107 |
| 180180135 (Comments: 1) | santosh113 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-21 07:25:09 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
 | 180190056 (Comments: 1) | MK 1 (Discussed changesets: 35) | 2/2 and there is a speed limit od 70 kmph, and that is not motorway. There is a proposal to be built new highway next to way Veles-Katlanovo. commented 2026-03-21 06:59:49 UTC by MK 1 ♦30 |
 | 180187969 (Comments: 2) | ProfElitYchet (Discussed changesets: 1) | "Office building" ок commented 2026-03-21 06:55:43 UTC by ProfElitYchet ♦1 |
| 180180148 (Comments: 2) | Bertjedoemawa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Stuk Hermelijn verwijderd. Dat is een groenstrook. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.60538,5.327731,18/?datastrip=20260302_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO commented 2026-03-21 06:48:11 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180180208 (Comments: 2) | Bertjedoemawa (Discussed changesets: 6) | reverted by changeset #180189082 commented 2026-03-21 06:30:17 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180186451 (Comments: 2) | anh nguyen nn (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted this changeset. commented 2026-03-21 06:28:00 UTC by nevw ♦2,173 |
| 180188918 (Comments: 1) | PipTheDev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-21 06:27:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179777748 (Comments: 2) | Nearest Green Distillery (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180188170 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 06:02:35 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179775094 (Comments: 2) | 500382522 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180188169 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 06:02:34 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
 | 180182958 (Comments: 1) | VisibleSouth (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi VisibleSouth, The D152, up to the junction with RD151 and RD481 is named the Leopards Hill Road. It gets its name from the old Leopards Hill Ranch. The homestead of the ranch, now a clinic, was at the base of the hill (Leopards Hill) at the... commented 2026-03-21 06:02:23 UTC by ftcat ♦212 |
| 179774984 (Comments: 3) | Sunrise computer and Network LLC Abu Dhabi (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180188134 where the comment is: "Remove spam" commented 2026-03-21 06:01:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 180148411 (Comments: 1) | pyrog (Discussed changesets: 101) | Bonjour, Je viens de refaire la continuité de deux relations bus r19752839 et r19752840. Elles ne sont pas citées dans ce changeset, oubli de téléchargement de la zone ? Marc commented 2026-03-21 05:43:43 UTC by mga_geo ♦294 |
| 180183133 (Comments: 2) | flowio (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-21 05:33:20 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180173275 (Comments: 2) | 500376405 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-21 05:33:19 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180177954 (Comments: 2) | 500380450 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-21 05:33:19 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180170655 (Comments: 2) | 10006977 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-21 05:33:18 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179774958 (Comments: 2) | 500382315 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180187195 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179770024 (Comments: 2) | morpheonco (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180187194 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 05:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179768812 (Comments: 2) | 500385097 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180187189 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 05:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 180119427 (Comments: 5) | zlyntud (Discussed changesets: 14) | Untuk kewenangan dalam menetapkan status jalan nasional sepenuhnya berada di tangan Kemen PU (dulu PUPR), bukan Kemenhub (dalam hal ini Ditjen Perhub Darat). Ditjen hanya menetapkan nomor rute dalam keputusannya, sementara PU menetapkan status jalan ... commented 2026-03-21 04:22:28 UTC by AlphaStars ♦2 |
| 180185314 (Comments: 1) | Ben Freeze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-21 04:21:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 137370859 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 38) | Relation roles corrected commented 2026-03-21 03:53:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,771 |
| 137464827 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 38) | Relation roles corrected commented 2026-03-21 03:53:24 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,771 |
| 137442201 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 38) | Roles in relation 15980981 corrected. commented 2026-03-21 03:49:13 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,771 |
| 180183834 (Comments: 1) | AlexPCastuera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-21 02:27:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180183480 (Comments: 1) | Agata1972 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-21 02:00:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180183390 (Comments: 1) | rafaelacsdejesus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-21 01:54:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179921730 (Comments: 1) | Abdullah Al Mamun Shourov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Revert of 179921655 commented 2026-03-21 01:44:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180141082 (Comments: 2) | pseek (Discussed changesets: 4) | コメントありがとうございます。 編集するにあたり、国土数値情報は当方はソースとしてはおりません。 メモの欄は、14年ほど前にこのデータを編集した方の表記と思われます... commented 2026-03-21 01:15:55 UTC by pseek ♦4 |
 | 180182963 (Comments: 1) | B252697 (Discussed changesets: 35) | The building and facility is already there, but it is undergoing enhancements work till Q2 2026, which should be soon! Around April to June https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/temporary-arena-kallang-world-aquatics-championships-enhancem... commented 2026-03-21 01:12:33 UTC by B252697 ♦43 |
| 180180822 (Comments: 1) | KiaaTiX (Discussed changesets: 199) | Hello, and thanks for this… update. I see you are adding a lot of data related to energy production and infrastructure, but the only description of your changesets is "update" without any source. Is this an import? <... commented 2026-03-21 00:59:16 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 180173226 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Wieso hast du den Bushaltestellen-Punkt mit dem Wohngebiet verbunden? commented 2026-03-21 00:54:19 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180173070 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Ach, ist der Name des Gebäudes "Grabmale Hibbeln GmbH"? commented 2026-03-21 00:53:14 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180172140 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Ach, ist der Name des Gebäudes "Steinmetz Ihrig"? commented 2026-03-21 00:48:42 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180171979 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Wieso sind die Tore nicht mit den Wegen verbunden? commented 2026-03-21 00:46:32 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180163195 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | building:levels=1 und addr:country=DE wurden gelöscht und nicht wieder hinzugefügt - addr:street wurde falsch verkürzt wieder hinzugefügt. Zu phone=* und fax=*: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone#Wie_ma... commented 2026-03-21 00:42:53 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180162918 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Wieso löschst du erst einmal alle Tags von dem Gärtnerei-Gebäude, nur um sie danach (unvöllständig) wieder einzutragen? commented 2026-03-21 00:40:37 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 172951501 (Comments: 3) | kenken234 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi kenken234, Ok! Will consider updating based on my personal knowledge / experience of the area commented 2026-03-21 00:33:22 UTC by B252697 ♦43 |
| 179918303 (Comments: 1) | EternAlmox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180182491 commented 2026-03-21 00:29:03 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179515625 (Comments: 2) | StadtLandFluss27 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Guten Abend, ja der Titel ist tatsächlich ungewöhnlich, steht aber so tatsächlich als Überschrift auf der Infotafel. Inscription würde ich intuitiv nicht für richtig halten, da hier ja nichts graviert wurde sondern es... commented 2026-03-21 00:18:16 UTC by StadtLandFluss27 ♦2 |
| 180180162 (Comments: 1) | Joaquinpegil (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Joaquinpegil, Gracias por mejorar OSM. Tengo una duda sobre la siguiente via: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218791303/ He visto que la has cambiado de "track" (pista) a "path" (senda). ¿El Ayuntamiento la ... commented 2026-03-20 23:29:35 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,763 |
 | 178131849 (Comments: 2) | Kerguelen Mapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97816026 - and on bridge this looks clearly invalid commented 2026-03-20 23:25:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
 | 180181437 (Comments: 1) | visadis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-20 23:21:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180179733 (Comments: 1) | thaynara flores (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9077763795 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-20 23:13:37 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180181037 (Comments: 1) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9680979424 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-20 23:13:36 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180181175 (Comments: 1) | Gaelan Steele (Discussed changesets: 1) | (er, chain) commented 2026-03-20 23:02:15 UTC by Gaelan Steele ♦1 |
| 151147459 (Comments: 1) | EkMapa (Discussed changesets: 2) | I am adding buildings in the same area. Thanks for your contribution. I wonder did you use AI/machine learning to generate building outlines or do it yourself? Almost all the buildings are not squared, and there are some strange artifacts and inac... commented 2026-03-20 22:56:24 UTC by Wookey ♦23 |
| 180164413 (Comments: 1) | martinlangerwat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, du hast hier neue Flächen gemappt und mit leisure=horse_riding als "Reitanlagen" getaggt, die nicht wie Reitanlagen im Sinne der Beschreibung dieses Tags im WIki aussehen. Diese Flächen gehören vermutlich zur "Rei... commented 2026-03-20 22:48:54 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦878 |
| 179759866 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoinplett (Discussed changesets: 5) | Private Members Club not allowed on OSM. A publicly accessible physical address is an absolute must. Please delete this POI. Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-03-20 22:47:38 UTC by Comino ♦323 |
| 179755933 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoinplett (Discussed changesets: 5) | Company name and address is missing. Incomplete node. Please update. Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-03-20 22:43:34 UTC by Comino ♦323 |
| 179600760 (Comments: 2) | Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 185) | Ich werde die Sperrung Anfang Juli (Beginn nächste Bauphase) löschen. Die Syntax ohne Jahreszahl wird besser unterstützt (z.B. von GraphHopper, dort optinales Features und bezieht sich auf den Zeitpunkt des Imports). commented 2026-03-20 22:39:13 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,205 |
| 179969784 (Comments: 7) | smsm1 (Discussed changesets: 12) | > it's for staff and signed in visitors only. So what? It's still an entity in its own right. Add access=* to indicate who can shop there. > Could map it separately however as a generally mapper from the public it'... commented 2026-03-20 22:21:19 UTC by DaveF ♦1,616 |
| 179996214 (Comments: 4) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 20) | I've reverted this changeset and some of the other incorrect crossings, based on an in-person survey. Streetside images, taken today, are referenced. commented 2026-03-20 22:14:53 UTC by spiregrain ♦229 |
| 180169926 (Comments: 1) | SchnuSchnu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, kurze Frage. Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6213889800#map=19/50.277852/9.370229 gibt es Schukosteckdosen, warum dann bicycle=no ? Gruß surveyor54 commented 2026-03-20 22:12:21 UTC by surveyor54 ♦671 |
| 180128752 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong weight restriction tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179857. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-20 22:07:27 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180127878 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong weight restriction tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179776. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-20 22:05:14 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180122357 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179725. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-20 22:02:37 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180122221 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179583#map=19/42.262167/-71.463326. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-20 21:57:44 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 175617730 (Comments: 2) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 141) | Co ciekawe, na tej stronie nadal nie zaktualizowali statusu sprawy. Może azbest na placu budowy ich spowolnił. commented 2026-03-20 21:49:16 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦388 |
| 177115209 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180179058 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 21:42:09 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180179079 (Comments: 1) | crushtheserpent (Discussed changesets: 16) | also added demolished:building tags where necessary commented 2026-03-20 21:38:14 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦20 |
| 180178979 (Comments: 1) | Standish Farm Supply (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 21:36:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 177131155 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180178641 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 21:34:38 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180102310 (Comments: 1) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Moin :) gib mal bitte eine Quelle an. Danke --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180102310 commented 2026-03-20 21:32:52 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
 | 180175599 (Comments: 1) | boocha34 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Please urgently improve your changeset comments; "fixing stuff" or "auditing $PLACENAME" is not a good changeset comment. commented 2026-03-20 21:32:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 172882528 (Comments: 1) | boocha34 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Dear boocha34, would you please comment on the alt_name in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13196374343 - is that supposed to be a joke or is there a source for this? commented 2026-03-20 21:30:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 180084405 (Comments: 1) | BeeBuzz01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi again :) the benches both look good --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180084405 commented 2026-03-20 21:29:04 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 180084468 (Comments: 1) | BeeBuzz01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there BeeBuzz01 :) thanks for taking the time to contribute to this project. You asked for a review of this changeset: - looks solid :) some things to change or consider: - capacity=* is currently only defined for numbe... commented 2026-03-20 21:28:25 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 179223012 (Comments: 2) | Openstreetmaplover2026 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Dear OpenStreetMapLover2026, please take note of the above comment. You have been active since, but you haven't fixed this issue yet! commented 2026-03-20 21:27:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 179972103 (Comments: 1) | UI Facilities Information (Discussed changesets: 2) | This hasn't pushed to google maps yet....must I do something to help push this? commented 2026-03-20 21:22:13 UTC by UI Facilities Information ♦1 |
| 180176940 (Comments: 3) | Subbeh (Discussed changesets: 4) | Lijsterweg ook losgemaakt van de landuse grass commented 2026-03-20 21:21:14 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180151538 (Comments: 1) | Sha10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, quelle source ? Pour moi c'est une parcelle cultivée qui va passer en la poursuite de la rue de la Corderie au nord (avec fermeture de la rue Guyomard au sud) et création de maisons (pluriel). Source : cadastre commented 2026-03-20 21:17:29 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 180151293 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 469) | Ce POI existe déjà https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13061420926 commented 2026-03-20 21:07:25 UTC by sykul ♦82 |
| 180176029 (Comments: 4) | NickvZelm (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yep.. Zou het even proberen. Je krijg als het goed is een ander symbool. Maar ik weet dat sommige combinaties dan weer niet renderen. Na veranderen paar keer CTRL-F5 Je cache leegmaken. Dan zie je effect. commented 2026-03-20 21:04:07 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177143547 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180176850 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 20:53:39 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180163494 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 9) | these are level updates from comaps commented 2026-03-20 20:47:37 UTC by synthfi ♦17 |
| 179904613 (Comments: 1) | skil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233990834 war als Gebäude (building=yes) getaggt und es sieht auf den Luftbildern auch aus wie ein Gebäude. Jedes Gebäude sollte ein building=* Tag haben, sonst wird es auf den Karten nicht als... commented 2026-03-20 20:42:00 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦878 |
| 142409638 (Comments: 1) | nyanpsyche (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11253756637/history has shop = equestrian that was added in this edit shop=equestrian ? Maybe shop=sports + sport=equestrian would work here equally well or better? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/... commented 2026-03-20 20:41:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 134038107 (Comments: 1) | yawfle (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10757201006/history has shop = equestrian that was added in this edit shop=equestrian ? Maybe shop=sports + sport=equestrian would work here equally well or better? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/... commented 2026-03-20 20:41:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 175939269 (Comments: 1) | KelsonV (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13376960525/history has shop = equestrian that was added in this edit shop=equestrian ? Maybe shop=sports + sport=equestrian would work here equally well or better? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/... commented 2026-03-20 20:41:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180175510 (Comments: 1) | luca_hofmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen: - Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerweise leer, da es sich um die &... commented 2026-03-20 20:38:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
| 180177049 (Comments: 1) | Earthworks Landscape Materials (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 20:36:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179556606 (Comments: 3) | AdamVista (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dear AdamVista, aerial imagery does not show any construction going on here. It is possible that imagery is outdated but you will have to provide sources that show there is actual construction going on. commented 2026-03-20 20:33:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 180158052 (Comments: 1) | Nils Bittner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Nur eine Anmerkung: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beh... commented 2026-03-20 20:32:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
| 180130398 (Comments: 1) | Wiktoria Jędrzejczyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-03-20 20:30:31 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180173491 (Comments: 10) | NickvZelm (Discussed changesets: 5) | Owja zo heette het gebouw toen ik begon met beweerken. Zie ook op hun website dat "De voorde" op het pand staat bij de ingang. https://hoevenkliniek.nl/locaties/utrechtseweg/ commented 2026-03-20 20:30:28 UTC by NickvZelm ♦2 |
| 180176508 (Comments: 2) | Subbeh (Discussed changesets: 4) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. gr eggie commented 2026-03-20 20:29:21 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179898945 (Comments: 1) | AdamVista (Discussed changesets: 4) | Der AdamVista, a "proposed" highway cannot come from satellite imagery, you need to specify the source of the information. commented 2026-03-20 20:28:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 180176314 (Comments: 1) | 500387405 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 20:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180170009 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 119) | sorry, new value is also not a standard one though without a typo commented 2026-03-20 20:14:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180165047 (Comments: 5) | Michi_07 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Notiz: Ich habe nun den ursprünglichen Zustand wiederhergestellt. Viele Grüße und einen schönen Abend noch commented 2026-03-20 20:07:01 UTC by Michi_07 ♦16 |
 | 152431424 (Comments: 1) | AKBarbershop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11964946044/history has shop = barbershop that was added in this edit shop=barbershop ? Maybe following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hairdresser%3Dbarber would be a good idea and shop=hairdresse... commented 2026-03-20 20:05:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179549052 (Comments: 3) | Simon Shuvo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Simon Shuvo, Thank you for responding and adding in construction tags. commented 2026-03-20 20:05:27 UTC by aaronq227 ♦30 |
| 154696365 (Comments: 1) | jarema90 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany, ponieważ nakładały się dwa strumienie. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-03-20 20:04:23 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180176000 (Comments: 1) | 500387266 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 20:03:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180175891 (Comments: 1) | 500381985 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 20:00:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180095898 (Comments: 1) | OknoSerwisPoznan - serwis naprawa regulacja szklenie okien serwis rolet poznań (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany. Proszę o zapoznanie się z https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487 przed dodaniem swojej firmy. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-03-20 19:59:10 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180175806 (Comments: 1) | 500385827 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 19:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178848641 (Comments: 1) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi, warum die Umklassifizierung? Ich konnte die Wiki-Definition, an der du das festmachst, nicht finden. LG commented 2026-03-20 19:42:58 UTC by gnlpfth ♦81 |
| 180175314 (Comments: 1) | Anurag Thakur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 19:42:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180153015 (Comments: 1) | atytet66 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-20 19:41:34 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180152965 (Comments: 1) | atytet66 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-20 19:41:11 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180152757 (Comments: 1) | atytet66 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-20 19:40:54 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180152737 (Comments: 1) | atytet66 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-20 19:40:47 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180152698 (Comments: 1) | atytet66 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-20 19:40:31 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180152637 (Comments: 1) | atytet66 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-20 19:40:17 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180127765 (Comments: 2) | drzewik1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Napisałem ci ledwo 3 dni temu, żeby ograniczać zapisywany zestaw zmian do bardziej lokalnego obszaru jeśli chodzi o drobnostki, a takie przypadki jak ten powinny być jeszcze lepiej opisane. Widać, że nie przeczytałeś. Jest to ostatnie ostrze... commented 2026-03-20 19:35:05 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦388 |
| 180174314 (Comments: 1) | Mihari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. La maxima es 80 en la caletera a la altura del centro de justicia (Avenida Viel). Está bien eso? Es una calle llena de entradas y salidas. Dónde está el cartel? Saludos commented 2026-03-20 19:31:12 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179236963 (Comments: 1) | Lenonn84 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your work! I've noticed you recently added some bike lanes that you mapped as bike paths. Please note that, for bike ways to be mapped as separate ways and tagged as cycle paths, they have to be not inherentl... commented 2026-03-20 19:24:59 UTC by chath_tsu ♦28 |
| 180145760 (Comments: 2) | Rambling Banjo (Discussed changesets: 2) | That makes sense. Now that I've looked into it, there is documentation on the wiki regarding this practice. I appreciate the feedback. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2026-03-20 19:21:57 UTC by Rambling Banjo ♦3 |
| 180099945 (Comments: 1) | Avotra Fanantenana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check the tags you added here - several of them should not appear in OSM, e.g. enumerator latitude longitude altitude gps_precision id community Please use only those tags that are available in your editor as p... commented 2026-03-20 19:01:13 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 180007891 (Comments: 1) | Erime619 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check the tags you added here - several of them should not appear in OSM, e.g. enumerator latitude longitude community Please use only those tags that are available in your editor as presets! commented 2026-03-20 19:00:41 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
 | 179785192 (Comments: 1) | Pry02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You're using tags like 'nombre' or 'invasora' here. This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or a... commented 2026-03-20 18:58:04 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 180173334 (Comments: 1) | NickvZelm (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Nick. In osm nederland is het gebruikelijk om op de adresnode bij te taggen. Dus niet op het gebouw. Mvg eggie commented 2026-03-20 18:46:45 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177062560 (Comments: 3) | Teddy73 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo, ich habe im Foren-Thread darauf geantwortet. VG Teddy commented 2026-03-20 18:43:09 UTC by Teddy73 ♦34 |
| 179989467 (Comments: 1) | LouArt008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | SVP ne pas changer arbitrairement les formes des maisons. Les images aériennes ne sont pas une source valable sur OSM pour les bâtiments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings Votre modif... commented 2026-03-20 18:35:21 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 179418485 (Comments: 3) | 15334419 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Mhm commented 2026-03-20 18:21:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 180149155 (Comments: 1) | heiman191 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't make locations obviously not towns `=town` commented 2026-03-20 18:21:20 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,806 |
| 179817744 (Comments: 1) | Perpignan Mediterranee Tourisme-Rivesaltes 1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Attention, l'hôtel était déjà présent. Rajoutez les infos aux points déjà présent. Je fusionne le doublon commented 2026-03-20 18:21:00 UTC by LySioS ♦143 |
| 177174577 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180172069 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 18:17:19 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179882248 (Comments: 1) | mixdm (Discussed changesets: 19) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489005887 это здание на самом деле уже снесено. commented 2026-03-20 18:16:52 UTC by HantDX ♦55 |
| 179815664 (Comments: 1) | Perpignan Mediterranee Tourisme-Rivesaltes 1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Merci pour ces ajouts. En ce qui concerne les étoiles des resto, hôtels, elles ne se rajoutent pas dans le nom mais dans une valeur spécifique. Dans l'éditeur en ligne, il faut descendre dans la p... commented 2026-03-20 18:14:20 UTC by LySioS ♦143 |
| 180165804 (Comments: 1) | AdamElbourne (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, thanks for adding the mall. I didn't know it wasn't on the map. I've removed the node and recreated it as a relation of all the buildings part of the mall. commented 2026-03-20 18:11:10 UTC by DwarfNebula_ ♦44 |
| 179977923 (Comments: 1) | AngryPen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Angry! there were some hidden characters in the phone number, maybe from pasting? I've removed them. Thanks for the info, keep mapping! commented 2026-03-20 18:05:57 UTC by wireguy ♦559 |
| 177197789 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, it looks like your changes here have accidentally enlarged the building footprint to also encompass the parking area which doesn't match the latest imagery. I have gone ahead and updated the building to match the latest imagery. Please be... commented 2026-03-20 18:01:27 UTC by JessAk71 ♦125 |
| 179879228 (Comments: 2) | DL1EKC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Map-Peter, weil der Laden von Samstag bis Montag geschlossen ist. commented 2026-03-20 18:00:15 UTC by DL1EKC ♦2 |
| 180145858 (Comments: 1) | Brann Sullivan Trial Lawyers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Congratulations on your first OpenStreetMap edit! Here are some helpful tips for future additions to the map: 1. Phone number should be formatted in international format (starting with +1). 2. opening_hours has a specific syntax ... commented 2026-03-20 17:59:43 UTC by skquinn ♦812 |
| 173368565 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, it looks like you may have accidentally added a building tag to this area, the entire area is not a building so it should not have a building tag, instead it should have the poi type tag to represent the business such as a specific amenity. I ... commented 2026-03-20 17:56:07 UTC by JessAk71 ♦125 |
| X | 179823046 (Comments: 3) | digitalfootprints (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm not sure what the Organic Maps interface shows, but using the name field for a general description of the object is generally discouraged. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only commented 2026-03-20 17:51:47 UTC by InsertUser ♦479 |
| 177188094 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180170953 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 17:49:22 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180170845 (Comments: 1) | Madres Modern Mexican (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180164860 (Comments: 2) | 15334419 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 17:33:24 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180161046 (Comments: 2) | Cornerstone Flooring LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 17:33:23 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179754936 (Comments: 2) | lyn2334343 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179762315 commented 2026-03-20 17:33:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179768647 (Comments: 2) | 500385818 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170916 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179768044 (Comments: 2) | 500386264 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170914 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179764545 (Comments: 2) | tituslivius (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement. commented 2026-03-20 17:33:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179762705 (Comments: 2) | Eplucon GmbH (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179771792 commented 2026-03-20 17:33:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179761143 (Comments: 2) | hanamigroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170911 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179760853 (Comments: 2) | Treasure Coast Canvas And Upholstery (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170908 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179760650 (Comments: 2) | 16736354 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170907 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179748869 (Comments: 2) | OneTouch Appliance Repair (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for removing the text by https://osm.org/changeset/179749277 commented 2026-03-20 17:33:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179748700 (Comments: 2) | Michaal Moris (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170904 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:03 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179742331 (Comments: 2) | Murillo Paschoal (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170903 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 180065041 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3867) | Hallo. Diese Namen auf Polisch, die ich auf alt_name geandert habe (z.b. Tylża, Wystruć), wird benutzt haufiger als die russischen Namen dieselber Orte (z.b. Sowieck). Warum haben Sie meine Anderung vollstandig ruckgangig gemacht? commented 2026-03-20 17:20:57 UTC by xdddddddxdxdxd ♦25 |
| 180170033 (Comments: 1) | 500386733 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180169893 (Comments: 1) | Paint Doctors & Epoxy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:12:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180169776 (Comments: 1) | 500385912 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:09:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180056307 (Comments: 2) | sleep enjoyer (Discussed changesets: 3) | @MappingMore The revert was not complete, the traffic lights that were modified were replaced by new nodes unlinked from their previous edit histories, and have not been restored. Do you recognize this pattern, or do you know this mapper? commented 2026-03-20 17:06:18 UTC by ftrebien ♦183 |
| 180169520 (Comments: 1) | 500375280 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:03:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179766786 (Comments: 5) | Auszeithaus Altental (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rechtsabbiegeverbot hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180169169 Bezüglich G Maps hätte ich vorgeschlagen das LKA Baden-Württemberger um Hilfe zu beten, die scheinen aber auch ihre Probleme mit dem Dienst ... commented 2026-03-20 16:58:41 UTC by FroschForscher ♦118 |
| 177782225 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, this changeset seems to have added business tags to this building which is incorrect since this building houses many businesses (more than 6) so the best thing to do is to make a node for the new business where its located instead of adding th... commented 2026-03-20 16:44:30 UTC by JessAk71 ♦125 |
| 167579082 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, this changeset seems to have added the restaurant as a building which is incorrect since its located inside the already correctly mapped building, it should have an amenity restaurant tag and be mapped as a node here. I have updated this for y... commented 2026-03-20 16:40:58 UTC by JessAk71 ♦125 |
| 177210914 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180168179 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 16:38:14 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179957984 (Comments: 1) | Heterodyne (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please follow the tagging mentioned in this wiki osm.wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa To measure the width of a road in ID editor First draw a line between the shoulders of a track . Then You can press [Ct... commented 2026-03-20 16:35:11 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 180134049 (Comments: 1) | Mom Tomahawk (Discussed changesets: 12) | This should be noname=yes; refs are not names. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180134049 commented 2026-03-20 16:31:04 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,395 |
| 177219456 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180167661 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 16:24:44 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180167801 (Comments: 1) | Queen Annes Lace (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 16:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180164745 (Comments: 2) | Noel de Ruijter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-20 16:23:56 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180083437 (Comments: 1) | slovak_scouser (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You mapped a through-going road as a track. Check the route of a trace before you decide how to tag it. This should be tagged as an unclassified highway. I changed it. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2026-03-20 16:19:24 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 177259758 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180167185 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 16:13:35 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180167435 (Comments: 1) | A35K (Discussed changesets: 15) | sources=Survey commented 2026-03-20 16:13:00 UTC by A35K ♦45 |
| 180166252 (Comments: 1) | MartijnKeus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-20 16:08:56 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180132081 (Comments: 1) | Rainero (Discussed changesets: 105) | Sorry, Fehler meinerseits, hier wurde changeset/177253515 zurückgesetzt. commented 2026-03-20 16:05:31 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180150900 (Comments: 1) | PDMMDP (Discussed changesets: 3) | Just in case you're not aware but Mapbox satellite imagery in this area and many others is the most up to date (looks like within the past year) and has the solar farm. commented 2026-03-20 15:58:58 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,299 |
| 180162734 (Comments: 1) | Chrisricketts82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on th... commented 2026-03-20 15:52:11 UTC by MassCartog ♦335 |
| 179889852 (Comments: 3) | HC Batenburg (Discussed changesets: 4) | HC Batenburg is door de DWG geblokkerd, maar heeft nu gevraagd om deze blokkade ongedaan te maken. Daar ga ik mee akkoord, maar heb wel de voorwaarde gesteld dat hij zich hier moet melden met zakelijke antwoorden en dat ook het forum een optie is ... commented 2026-03-20 15:41:59 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179889957 (Comments: 2) | HC Batenburg (Discussed changesets: 4) | HC Batenburg is door de DWG geblokkerd, maar heeft nu gevraagd om deze blokkade ongedaan te maken. Daar ga ik mee akkoord, maar heb wel de voorwaarde gesteld dat hij zich hier moet melden met zakelijke antwoorden en dat ook het forum een optie is ... commented 2026-03-20 15:41:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179893263 (Comments: 2) | HC Batenburg (Discussed changesets: 4) | HC Batenburg is door de DWG geblokkerd, maar heeft nu gevraagd om deze blokkade ongedaan te maken. Daar ga ik mee akkoord, maar heb wel de voorwaarde gesteld dat hij zich hier moet melden met zakelijke antwoorden en dat ook het forum een optie is ... commented 2026-03-20 15:41:41 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179893850 (Comments: 3) | HC Batenburg (Discussed changesets: 4) | HC Batenburg is door de DWG geblokkerd, maar heeft nu gevraagd om deze blokkade ongedaan te maken. Daar ga ik mee akkoord, maar heb wel de voorwaarde gesteld dat hij zich hier moet melden met zakelijke antwoorden en dat ook het forum een optie is ... commented 2026-03-20 15:41:28 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 180160804 (Comments: 1) | Reich Dániel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv az OSM-en! Opcionálisan megadható még office=logistics, building=warehouse és egyéb címkék, lásd a wiki oldalakat. Mik ezek pontosan? Raktárépületek vagy csak irod&aa... commented 2026-03-20 15:37:12 UTC by qstep ♦67 |
| 178169012 (Comments: 1) | TB@HOTMAIL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for clarifying this for me! commented 2026-03-20 15:22:23 UTC by moonpenny ♦2 |
| 178789982 (Comments: 1) | Exporter7281 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a duplicate of the one several feet up the road in changeset 174626392? One may need to be deleted unless there are two there now; would not be the first redundancy in this city. commented 2026-03-20 15:12:54 UTC by moonpenny ♦2 |
| 180163979 (Comments: 1) | 500386532 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 15:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180163709 (Comments: 1) | RS Sports Cards (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:54:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180103384 (Comments: 2) | Zaneo (Discussed changesets: 15) | Nope, my mistake: both the circular area and west side feature are indeed hedge-like. Even so, I'd suggest considering natural=shrubbery with shrubbery:density=medium - it's up to you. commented 2026-03-20 14:51:57 UTC by jayaddison ♦12 |
| 180163291 (Comments: 1) | 500387125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:45:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180163141 (Comments: 1) | 500386716 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:42:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180162981 (Comments: 1) | 500386998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:39:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180149294 (Comments: 1) | mechka (Discussed changesets: 8) | EveryDoor е доста по-удобен за такива промени, спрямо CoMaps https://every-door.app/ commented 2026-03-20 14:37:49 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦838 |
| 180162852 (Comments: 1) | 500386707 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:36:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179920246 (Comments: 4) | A-dg6 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Oke.. duidelijk. commented 2026-03-20 14:32:36 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180161500 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmapbuddy (Discussed changesets: 42) | Is interdicted to copy data from other maps! Especially google and waze commented 2026-03-20 14:31:25 UTC by rarad74 ♦441 |
| 180151690 (Comments: 3) | reny_koevoets (Discussed changesets: 4) | Kijk.. dicht bij het vuur 😀 commented 2026-03-20 14:30:05 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180154767 (Comments: 4) | Johan Stuart (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi Johan Je icoontje wordt nu weer een verrekijker. Dan komt door dr tag bird_hide. Groet, eggie commented 2026-03-20 14:26:16 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 176935688 (Comments: 2) | rokas_osm (Discussed changesets: 17) | Example foot: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=46.786588%2C7.083585%3B46.785934%2C7.080104#map=19/46.785944/7.080574 bicycle broken too. commented 2026-03-20 14:25:42 UTC by vmicho ♦85 |
| 180155209 (Comments: 4) | reny_koevoets (Discussed changesets: 4) | No problem.. commented 2026-03-20 14:22:36 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180159954 (Comments: 1) | barnesy07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2786282621 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-20 14:07:25 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 180159618 (Comments: 1) | Onni Martikainen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13662647858 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-20 14:07:20 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180156462 (Comments: 1) | qmetaram (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9301049133 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-20 14:07:11 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180150470 (Comments: 1) | Cris3271 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1558411140 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-20 14:06:45 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180144098 (Comments: 2) | Conn Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10236532415 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-20 14:06:26 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 180142656 (Comments: 1) | She knows beauty salon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4938267654 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-20 14:06:10 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 176886946 (Comments: 2) | iqbalna09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | fixed in changeset/180161306 commented 2026-03-20 14:03:42 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 129021667 (Comments: 2) | maikeljeferei202 (Discussed changesets: 8) | fixed in changeset/180161156 commented 2026-03-20 13:59:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 180160810 (Comments: 1) | 500383360 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 13:54:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 147085844 (Comments: 2) | GrabID_Ghifari Agustama (Discussed changesets: 2) | fixed in changeset/180160756 commented 2026-03-20 13:49:33 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 164390360 (Comments: 1) | haprager (Discussed changesets: 9) | need more information as to why you think it needs to be routed along US 20 in the fixme? commented 2026-03-20 13:40:59 UTC by Natfoot ♦106 |
| 180155592 (Comments: 1) | googlenaut (Discussed changesets: 135) | I am afraid this MapRoulette quest was solved without looking carefully. Adding covered=yes to the service road may fool the validator but does not match reality. Had you inspected the real situation more carefully, you would have noticed tha... commented 2026-03-20 13:29:26 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 180036708 (Comments: 2) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thanks for the heads-up, I forgot to remove the amenity=place_of_worship. Thanks for spotting! commented 2026-03-20 13:27:20 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 178645157 (Comments: 1) | nicojp (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. The track mapped with the tag "path" is by default unpaved. No need to add that tag additionally. Best regards commented 2026-03-20 13:14:35 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 178911540 (Comments: 1) | KatuPiku2027 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180158603 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 12:59:42 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180154684 (Comments: 1) | MZabik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, rozumiem, że to Twoja uwaga? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5212191 commented 2026-03-20 12:55:47 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,800 |
| 178980774 (Comments: 1) | Jerry_8765 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 12:55:08 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 178986782 (Comments: 1) | Monkey_D_Luffy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 12:54:53 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 178986919 (Comments: 1) | Jammy_1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180158375 --- #REVIE... commented 2026-03-20 12:54:24 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 178987954 (Comments: 1) | Shinchan_S25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180158290 --- #REVIE... commented 2026-03-20 12:52:18 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179016433 (Comments: 1) | Powerman_123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 12:50:32 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179017016 (Comments: 1) | Doraemon_S19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180158194 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 12:50:14 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179017290 (Comments: 1) | Abc@2003 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180158103 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 12:48:09 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180154857 (Comments: 1) | Johan Stuart (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wanneer het eiland werkelijk een naam heeft kan die naam er op. Wanneer het een broedeiland is dan niet na,e, maar description gebruiken. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-20 12:46:27 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179017296 (Comments: 1) | Nanna2468 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check updates on your edits --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-03-20 12:45:43 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179017421 (Comments: 1) | Useme_4728 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180157965 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 12:44:51 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180155893 (Comments: 1) | sv-pro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, Díky za doplnění a upřesnění. Jen detail: ne všechny tagy je potřeba smazat: čistička je pořád průmyslová budova, a rozhledna je pořád s výhledem (ačkoliv je to... commented 2026-03-20 12:41:38 UTC by Piskvor ♦454 |
| 179017490 (Comments: 1) | Kitty_363 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180157739 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 12:37:42 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180155533 (Comments: 1) | reny_koevoets (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Reny Probeer een winkel bij te taggen op de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-20 12:31:51 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177932704 (Comments: 1) | Vi2727 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Regarding a charge point (man_made=charge_point) you added: I have added a charging station (amenity=charging_station), as individual charge points are not meant to be mapped without one. A charging station can contain multiple charge points. ... commented 2026-03-20 12:26:00 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦121 |
| 180157046 (Comments: 1) | Donald Roman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 12:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
 | 179875659 (Comments: 1) | goose335 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 已經有回退了 還沒有真得變更施工請勿事先畫上未來建設 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179875659 commented 2026-03-20 12:09:18 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,257 |
| 180148198 (Comments: 1) | Aim311_ (Discussed changesets: 75) | cieszę się, że ogarnałeś relacje inner/outer ;D Zrobiłem pare mian też dodatkowych tu masz wms z BDL jak masz wątpliwości czy cos jest lasem czy nie: https://mapserver.bdl.lasy.gov.pl/arcgis/services/WMS_BDL/MapServer/WmsServer?... commented 2026-03-20 12:05:43 UTC by Yog Sot ♦441 |
| 180147648 (Comments: 1) | premiumnutsdaily (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The feature is not the whole building so I've made it a POI. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-03-20 12:02:35 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,119 |
| 180136386 (Comments: 1) | Taksine (Discussed changesets: 44) | 请在回退后做出必要的提示，例如在你退掉的 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180125475 中最好是用直接的不费猜的方式来介绍它已经被退了。是的，这里是有很多有争议的编辑，但你不去说明... commented 2026-03-20 11:58:27 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦584 |
| 180125475 (Comments: 2) | 情人头一回54 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Taksine 在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180136386 中进行了回退 commented 2026-03-20 11:55:31 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦584 |
| 180063425 (Comments: 1) | Zaneo (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi - thanks for contributing to the map; I think your edit might have reduced the routability of this path for pedestrians, though. I could be mistaken, but I seem to remember this being a relatively wide section of pedestrian-access path that leads... commented 2026-03-20 11:48:06 UTC by jayaddison ♦12 |
| 180154472 (Comments: 1) | Johan Stuart (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Johan, Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-20 11:37:23 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180154526 (Comments: 1) | Merveille Yadogo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 11:36:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180152830 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 464) | Also ts2526a commented 2026-03-20 11:25:28 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,696 |
| 180151884 (Comments: 1) | Erwin Wailland (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo! Die Radweg-Anknüpfung und die Zufahrt zu den Gewerbegebäuden einfach zu löschen, entspricht nicht der Situation vor Ort. Ich habe es wieder eingezeichnet. LG. commented 2026-03-20 11:25:03 UTC by thopf ♦85 |
| 120351046 (Comments: 1) | Johan Stuart (Discussed changesets: 4) | Natuurgebied bestaande uit ondiep water, slik, riet en grasland. Er komen veel vogels voor zoals Grutto's, Watersnippen, Kluten, Wintertalingen en Bergeenden. commented 2026-03-20 11:24:56 UTC by Johan Stuart ♦2 |
| 180150800 (Comments: 1) | ciee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Please decrease your edit area. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-03-20 11:22:41 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180153114 (Comments: 2) | MTijn (Discussed changesets: 12) | De andere steiger had je ook verwijderd. Die heb ik teruggezet. Het is toch een steiger. vissen is de functie. commented 2026-03-20 11:21:29 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180122005 (Comments: 2) | Thundafox (Discussed changesets: 11) | Behoben, Dach bekommt layer=1 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180122005 commented 2026-03-20 11:20:07 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 180153695 (Comments: 1) | Soós Péter (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reménytelen. :) Kilátópont sincs? Pedig nagyon szép innen a panoráma, szívesen megmutatnám, ha esetleg még nem láttad. commented 2026-03-20 11:17:55 UTC by später77 ♦4 |
| 180151571 (Comments: 3) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 168) | Just because OSM is a geographical database, and information like addresses should never be written several times. commented 2026-03-20 11:01:22 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 180132171 (Comments: 1) | santamonicaeliteroofers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:180152775 commented 2026-03-20 10:59:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 176543333 (Comments: 1) | d3mol3k (Discussed changesets: 115) | cześć! dlaczego usunąłeś drogę rowerową z Dobrzycy do Piły (fragment)? Coś tam zostało zlikwidowane? commented 2026-03-20 10:53:58 UTC by grelus ♦168 |
| 177438289 (Comments: 5) | Teddy73 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo Gaessje, ich bin über https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-von-gebaude-geometrien-etc-durch-nutzer/142460/9 auf diesen Änderungssatz aufmerksam geworden. Kannst du Gebäude mit OSM-ID benennen, die abgerissen... commented 2026-03-20 10:50:37 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,205 |
| 177228943 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180151654 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-20 10:49:30 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 175420387 (Comments: 1) | Pepe Sánchez de Wu (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hola! Estoy revisando etiquetas de acceso en distintos lugares y en el puente monteagudo se ve en la foto (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=820189932252647) que tiene veredas peatonales, por lo que la vía del puente no debería tener ... commented 2026-03-20 10:35:46 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦144 |
| 179968556 (Comments: 1) | YDei00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, por qué has borrado esos pasos? Y más problemáticamente, por qué has movido los nodos? La calle está bien torcida. commented 2026-03-20 10:29:57 UTC by Pipeton ♦39 |
 | 180150744 (Comments: 1) | Josh Batey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 10:12:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 175783222 (Comments: 1) | Pepe Sánchez de Wu (Discussed changesets: 13) | Buen día! Consulto porque el bulevar Perón tiene veredas al costado de la calle y paradas de colectivo. El agregado de foot=no no se condice con esta situación impidiendo el ruteo para peatones por esta calle. Me parece que deber... commented 2026-03-20 10:11:15 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦144 |
| 178850997 (Comments: 2) | Bilykralik16 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ano, mění, ale body pak nevykresluje samotná OSM. Proto není řešením změna původního bodu stanice/zastávky na místo zastavení, ale případné přidání nov&e... commented 2026-03-20 10:05:58 UTC by Bilykralik16 ♦11 |
| 167015705 (Comments: 1) | Didcreez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour. J'étais intrigué par le tracé autour d'Enedis situé Ancienne route d'Avignon. En me rendant sur place, j'ai vu qu'en fait tout est en surface. Le tag level=-1 n'a pas lieu d'&... commented 2026-03-20 09:56:54 UTC by bestinthewest ♦3 |
| 168845959 (Comments: 2) | Bilykralik16 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Namátkou třeba Praha, Brno, Paříž, Berlín... Ohledně správnosti dle OSM wiki: place=town pro města, place=suburb pro jeho velké oblasti s názvem a vlastní identitou, dále place=quarter pro ... commented 2026-03-20 09:56:46 UTC by Bilykralik16 ♦11 |
| 180149947 (Comments: 1) | Free Tour en Estambul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 09:54:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180149867 (Comments: 1) | Prowesssoft (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 09:51:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179795506 (Comments: 2) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted in changeset/180149790 commented 2026-03-20 09:47:28 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 180045599 (Comments: 2) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted in changeset/180149718 commented 2026-03-20 09:45:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 179973082 (Comments: 1) | zlyntud (Discussed changesets: 14) | tag distance dalam OSM itu dalam satuan meter commented 2026-03-20 09:37:32 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 180085803 (Comments: 1) | Plantão01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180149053; 180149262 commented 2026-03-20 09:32:50 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180149107 (Comments: 1) | royvanv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Beste Het bedrijf staat hier al getagd. Nu is het dubbel. Ik haal één vermelding weer weg. commented 2026-03-20 09:30:23 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180145701 (Comments: 1) | JJ_P (Discussed changesets: 1) | In this massive changeset, you removed the name of the BBC Music Studios building - did you mean to do that? I'm looking forward to seeing the results come through on https://demo.f4map.com/ soon. commented 2026-03-20 09:30:08 UTC by spiregrain ♦229 |
| 180148060 (Comments: 1) | MTijn (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dag MTijn. De waterway heb ik losgemaakt van de brug MVG eggie commented 2026-03-20 09:27:09 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180148438 (Comments: 2) | royvanv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Adres hersteld.. bedrijf verplaatst commented 2026-03-20 09:22:40 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180023931 (Comments: 1) | JayEmm89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180148852 commented 2026-03-20 09:21:49 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 180129590 (Comments: 1) | PrUsT2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. La formattazione dei numeri di telefono era corretta prima della tua modifica. Il prefisso è 0323 non 032. Il formato da seguire è sempre prefisso internazionale + spazio + prefisso + spazio + numero. Ciao, Andrea -... commented 2026-03-20 09:18:06 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,509 |
| 98622729 (Comments: 1) | Maria Hoeblinger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich habe das rückgängig gemacht. Wir unterscheiden zwischen addr:street für echte Straßennamen (i.A. auf Schildern) und addr:place, wenn es nur Hausnummern pro Ortschaft gibt. Die basemap kennt diese Unterscheidung nicht, ... commented 2026-03-20 09:15:47 UTC by wolfbert ♦135 |
| 172235198 (Comments: 1) | AlaskaDave (Discussed changesets: 62) | see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=caldera commented 2026-03-20 09:06:08 UTC by kuhni74 ♦428 |
| 180147691 (Comments: 1) | howardbrown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 08:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180109215 (Comments: 1) | ashtray455 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in changeset id:180147692 commented 2026-03-20 08:51:53 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180131002 (Comments: 2) | davras (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo David! Wenn ich danach suche, erscheint https://github.com/bbl-dres/property-inventory als Hinweis. Kannst du für einen Moment stoppen, Daten in OpenStreetMap zu importieren, bis "wir" mehr wissen dazu? Gruss, (a... commented 2026-03-20 08:49:59 UTC by habi ♦2,059 |
| 180100529 (Comments: 1) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180147213 commented 2026-03-20 08:45:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 173030231 (Comments: 2) | Timmy_Tesseract (Discussed changesets: 32) | Haven't visited the peak of this particular hill. Where did you learn about this mine? Really interesting to learn how extensive mining activities around this area used to be in the past. commented 2026-03-20 08:44:50 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦175 |
| 180125158 (Comments: 1) | davras (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo davras Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Mit fällt auf, dass du mit `created_by=osm_elevation_browser` eine Software zu benutzen scheinst, die... commented 2026-03-20 08:37:43 UTC by habi ♦2,059 |
| 153640131 (Comments: 1) | phantasma097 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28777353/ I'm wondering if this is something other than Ardcolm Drive. 1. There seems to be a housing estate in Castlebridge called Ardcolm Drive. 2. It doesn't sound like a typi... commented 2026-03-20 08:13:44 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 180111528 (Comments: 1) | AgathaS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in changeset id:180145840 commented 2026-03-20 08:08:18 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180027797 (Comments: 1) | Nahaliuk (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180145399 commented 2026-03-20 07:58:17 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
 | 179453676 (Comments: 1) | pedr0faria (Discussed changesets: 14) | The task was well mapped. I simplified some objects that were mapped with too many nodes, using SHIFT+Y in JOSM. Once again, thank you for your participation! commented 2026-03-20 07:37:47 UTC by James_OWORNTE ♦1 |
| 179027413 (Comments: 1) | lawrencebanks (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hello! Next time you map a new business opening in place of an old one, please reuse the node of the old business (in this case, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6447258236) so that the history (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6447258236/... commented 2026-03-20 07:33:58 UTC by leveskockaa ♦68 |
| 180143568 (Comments: 2) | BDijkslag (Discussed changesets: 2) | Voorlopig teruggedraaid en aangepast naar disused:highway Witruimte verwijderd commented 2026-03-20 07:33:06 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180143520 (Comments: 2) | BDijkslag (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #180144278 commented 2026-03-20 07:21:32 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180133153 (Comments: 1) | Telluris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-20 07:12:17 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180103038 (Comments: 2) | deadmix (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted ! second times you try to seo spam OSM ! this time we checked and there is no legal registred company here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180144168 commented 2026-03-20 07:12:14 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦127 |
| 180073572 (Comments: 1) | Vera_skidanovaa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Я исправил новые построенные здания - взял контуры зданий из ЕГРН (кадастр). Пожалуйста пользуйтесь снимками Esri. commented 2026-03-20 06:45:19 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,283 |
| 180073617 (Comments: 1) | Vera_skidanovaa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, при редактировании, используйте спутниковые снимки Esri, они намного свежее чем Bing, которым пользовались вы. Спр... commented 2026-03-20 06:40:37 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,283 |
| 180126918 (Comments: 1) | nitro_jesus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for reading the Wiki!! Love that. commented 2026-03-20 05:34:46 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 180128342 (Comments: 2) | Woodsense LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 05:33:14 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180129371 (Comments: 2) | Lawrenceburg Home Boutique (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 05:33:14 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180127204 (Comments: 2) | 500384166 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 05:33:13 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179727226 (Comments: 2) | Dennis UDA (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179727309 commented 2026-03-20 05:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179732415 (Comments: 2) | Michaal Moris (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179748700 commented 2026-03-20 05:33:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 151668669 (Comments: 1) | ElectroDriver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5208299 ? commented 2026-03-20 05:33:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179717846 (Comments: 2) | cravenbailbondsohio (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180140271 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-20 05:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
 | 179728355 (Comments: 2) | Tafoor (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/180140272 commented 2026-03-20 05:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 177762975 (Comments: 1) | sathibabu_srm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSM... commented 2026-03-20 05:30:39 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177566596 (Comments: 1) | Basha kandukuru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180140118#map=19/14.191511/78.6334... commented 2026-03-20 05:29:11 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177563502 (Comments: 1) | Mana ooru mall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Your deletion is not clear, as the road is clearly visible in Bing imagery ... commented 2026-03-20 05:27:12 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177389053 (Comments: 1) | trajectory (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 05:25:53 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177459999 (Comments: 1) | ar_Mahalakshmi * (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139944 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 05:24:17 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179017509 (Comments: 1) | Teddy_4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139813 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 05:20:02 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179017850 (Comments: 1) | Dustybun_st (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 05:16:18 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179017667 (Comments: 1) | Bheem@12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139707 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 05:15:44 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179018484 (Comments: 1) | AirDrop 296 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). No name for land use. You need to make another shape for place. --- ... commented 2026-03-20 05:11:57 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179018574 (Comments: 1) | Useme_4728 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139486 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 05:07:47 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179045416 (Comments: 1) | venkat1992 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139413 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 05:04:51 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177786856 (Comments: 1) | Proudcrab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). No point object for land --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-03-20 04:57:07 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177831730 (Comments: 1) | Jangam Sanjay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Mapping should not consider shadows seen in satellite images. You should map only top vie... commented 2026-03-20 04:56:09 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177846687 (Comments: 1) | Harsha Chitti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Map should not consider shadows of buildings, only the top view. Please check your edits ... commented 2026-03-20 04:54:49 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177993064 (Comments: 1) | Sravan Chemikala (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). User proper capitalisation for values. Start small with one or two feature edits. revie... commented 2026-03-20 04:51:43 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 177996264 (Comments: 1) | Hemanthg7657 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). You have duplicate residential highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473546388#map=18... commented 2026-03-20 04:49:37 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179990486 (Comments: 3) | Ra_colate (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi DaveF, there was a small offshoot with the highway segment, causing a building-highway intersection error. While fixing that, I accidentally removed the layer tag. Thank you for pointing this out. I’ll double-check my similar previous edits ... commented 2026-03-20 04:44:57 UTC by Ra_colate ♦20 |
| 178789116 (Comments: 1) | Dipika Satam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 04:41:21 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179129670 (Comments: 1) | Appana Sai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 04:40:33 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179134748 (Comments: 1) | Megha_sai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180138534 --- #REVIE... commented 2026-03-20 04:39:51 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179158391 (Comments: 1) | VARUN23@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180138009 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 04:29:33 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179238096 (Comments: 1) | Puppypeo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180138009 --- ... commented 2026-03-20 04:26:28 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180104596 (Comments: 1) | Kroactic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 04:22:28 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180135549 (Comments: 1) | Bathula Avinash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-20 04:20:21 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179944146 (Comments: 1) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 11) | Partially Revert of 179916828 commented 2026-03-20 04:00:46 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180136548 (Comments: 2) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 37) | they didn't annex the parkway/parking strip for some reason commented 2026-03-20 03:46:09 UTC by ieguy3 ♦37 |
| 180116797 (Comments: 1) | ACE_PANTA (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您好，欢迎加入 OSM 中国社区~ 注意“建筑”和“用地”，对用地要删除 building=* 哦 commented 2026-03-20 03:23:30 UTC by Higashimado ♦23 |
| 180034633 (Comments: 1) | crgbsly (Discussed changesets: 4) | Are there name for these two stores? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180034633 commented 2026-03-20 03:19:57 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,257 |
 | 180107411 (Comments: 1) | Urquidi79Arq (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, en una anterior edición dijiste que hay dos escuelas en el mismo terreno. adela zamudio y prada como son 2 escuelas en un mismo espacio es mejor dejar el área total sin nombre y cada punto con cada nombre. busqu&eacu... commented 2026-03-20 02:57:48 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,654 |
| 180135801 (Comments: 1) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 121) | note/5137421 commented 2026-03-20 02:51:58 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 180064102 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 136) | Slippery slope: if any road that branches away from `=*` can be considered a `=*_link`, then almost every road can be considered a link. Would `=unclassified` work? commented 2026-03-20 02:44:53 UTC by kingkingHK ♦268 |
| 180135682 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 37) | it was annexation of camelback road commented 2026-03-20 02:31:56 UTC by ieguy3 ♦37 |
| 180092565 (Comments: 1) | AllenWang6212 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 沒有地址的話，像是沒有匯入的地址點位，就不用硬加上去 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180092565 commented 2026-03-20 02:25:23 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,257 |
| 180135442 (Comments: 1) | billchenchina (Discussed changesets: 1) | 抓到活的在线的billchen了喵（不过其实甚至可以画地下连起来这样它在routing里面就不会是两条断头路了 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180135442<... commented 2026-03-20 02:14:42 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦584 |
| 180135481 (Comments: 1) | ganchan183 (Discussed changesets: 3) | if yh:WIDTH is correct, you can transfer it to widely used OSM tag following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Width_of_streets --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180135... commented 2026-03-20 02:12:52 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦584 |
| 179955222 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 211) | Okay, I guess that makes sense. Unrelated, but a long time ago, I downgraded Desert Inn Road west of Rainbow Boulevard to secondary. A few days ago, I upgraded Sky Vista Drive to primary because: a) It is the westernmost arterial (for now) of some... commented 2026-03-20 02:08:18 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦200 |
| 180134840 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 37) | jackrabbit trail was annexed. forgot to include it in the last update for this area commented 2026-03-20 01:19:39 UTC by ieguy3 ♦37 |
| 179588503 (Comments: 1) | B1llyB0nes (Discussed changesets: 1) | I did not spot any ALPR device in that intersection. What is there is a standard traffic camera. Be sure to reference the deflock.me for images on existing ALPRs. What's most commonly found on intersections like these are the white Genete... commented 2026-03-20 01:18:27 UTC by NG218 ♦9 |
| 180120907 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Keine Fußgängerzone commented 2026-03-20 01:15:42 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180120170 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Keine Fußgängerzone https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=pedestrian commented 2026-03-20 01:14:25 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180118899 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Der eingezeichnete Weg liegt jetzt teilweise außerhalb des tatsächlichen Weges commented 2026-03-20 01:10:44 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180035062 (Comments: 1) | AgathaS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Revert of 180034079 commented 2026-03-20 01:06:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180095483 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180134584 - Gebäude und Friedhofsfläche wurden unnötigerweise zum Multipolygon geändert commented 2026-03-20 01:02:18 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180094784 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Weiterhin unnötiges Multipolygon + überlappende Flächen commented 2026-03-20 00:58:20 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180094650 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180134543 - doppelte und nicht auf den Grenzen laufende Mauer wieder entfernt commented 2026-03-20 00:57:29 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180062818 (Comments: 1) | JackWoodgate (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id:180134519 commented 2026-03-20 00:56:49 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180094514 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180134474, da Fläche in unsinniges Multipolygon geändert wurde commented 2026-03-20 00:53:03 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 180094196 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Wieso hast du die Friedhofsgrenze mit der Stromleitung verbunden? commented 2026-03-20 00:48:22 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 179849379 (Comments: 2) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks for this. commented 2026-03-20 00:47:58 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦10 |
| 180058291 (Comments: 2) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180133797 commented 2026-03-20 00:10:08 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180016706 (Comments: 1) | nsut (Discussed changesets: 11) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180133635 commented 2026-03-20 00:00:34 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 179609274 (Comments: 1) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 14) | HI The roles in relation 20304766 are incorrect.. The outside has been given the role 'inner' and the inside has been given the role 'outer'. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=178.16222&lat... commented 2026-03-19 23:54:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,771 |
| 179384147 (Comments: 3) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 452) | Tylko ja myślałem że to będzie bardziej lokalnie robione, a nie że pół Polski ma te tagi, miejscami od dwóch lat. No ale ok, następnym razem syncnę się na discordzie, żeby się upewnić że dany rejon jest już zmapowany i tag... commented 2026-03-19 23:52:02 UTC by SpinOff ♦366 |
| 179999735 (Comments: 1) | Заболотна А (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180133469 commented 2026-03-19 23:48:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
 | 180082530 (Comments: 1) | cajg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180133260 commented 2026-03-19 23:37:51 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 177245114 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, What feature is relation Rotorua Central Mall (20086689), v1 trying to map? An indoor corridor? A building? A shop? It is tagged for all 3 ... I think it should be mapping the shop=mall as Each building has ... commented 2026-03-19 23:35:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,771 |
| 180133011 (Comments: 1) | idcomunicacao (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 23:21:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179583204 (Comments: 1) | Jivesas (Discussed changesets: 13) | Nice work on all these edits around NW Vic Jiveas!!!! commented 2026-03-19 23:12:29 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦428 |
| 179240795 (Comments: 1) | se7q38 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Durch diese "Berichtigung" gibt es statt einem Parkhaus am Klinikum jetzt fälschlicherweise drei. Außerdem wurde ein Großteil der tags, die das Parkhaus hatte, mit der Relation gelöscht. Ich bitte darum, das zu korrigi... commented 2026-03-19 22:41:44 UTC by N9713 ♦17 |
| 177253515 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180132081 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 22:28:31 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 177311528 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180131969 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 22:26:36 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 177325666 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180131614 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 22:13:02 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 177340578 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180131409 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 22:05:29 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178957779 (Comments: 5) | michikommader (Discussed changesets: 2) | Meine Intention dahinter, addr:housenumber zuzuweisen, war, dass bspw. Mapy (https://mapy.com/de/turisticka?l=0&source=osm&id=1191345276&x=10.5622991&y=52.3150148&z=18) dann die DLR-internen Gebäudenummern als "Hausnumme... commented 2026-03-19 22:05:25 UTC by michikommader ♦3 |
| 180131366 (Comments: 1) | 500386668 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 22:00:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178993590 (Comments: 1) | cwodwrth (Discussed changesets: 2) | 5.23 has been decommissioned and is now Taxiway J commented 2026-03-19 21:48:11 UTC by scs411scs ♦1 |
| 180023812 (Comments: 4) | Cartografo1968 (Discussed changesets: 14) | ok. la acabo de reponer. gracias. commented 2026-03-19 21:43:54 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 180130535 (Comments: 1) | 500378474 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 21:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180130426 (Comments: 1) | 10116091 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 21:24:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180130347 (Comments: 1) | user063628292 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 21:21:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 177343050 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180130252 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 21:21:28 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180130166 (Comments: 1) | Decadent Gifts & Gallery (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 21:18:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 177353172 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180129768 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 21:12:38 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180079871 (Comments: 1) | belljaf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi belljaf, I notice you've altered the parish boundaries for Alwoodley and Harewood, however the data you have used are the electoral wards of Leeds City Council, which are completely different. See the difference here: - Alwoodley parish: h... commented 2026-03-19 21:02:19 UTC by JezCrow ♦167 |
| 180119103 (Comments: 1) | Victoire5660 (Discussed changesets: 1) | aaa n'est pas un bon commentaire ;-). De plus si vous voulez ajouter les adresses, il est vivement conseiilé : de ne mettre ni commune ni code postal (inutiles, ils sont déduits de la position, de faire des rues entières,... commented 2026-03-19 21:00:29 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 180118798 (Comments: 2) | Lys_andre (Discussed changesets: 1) | de plus on ne peut pas dire que c'est un amphithéâtre au sens antique, c'est à dire un théatre avec une forme spéciale : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:theatre:type%3Damphi commented 2026-03-19 20:52:10 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 180128115 (Comments: 1) | TheIndra (Discussed changesets: 8) | review_requested \tyes Lijkt me oke. gr eggie commented 2026-03-19 20:45:44 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179327153 (Comments: 1) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 131) | ik vind https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15729595 verdacht (vind er niks over op het internet). Ja je hebt de naam van dat natuurinrichtingsrapport, maar degene die verantwoordelijk was voor de hydrologie heeft enkel de kaartlagen bij de bronne... commented 2026-03-19 20:45:37 UTC by Joske1020 ♦36 |
| 177365742 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180128852 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 20:40:51 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 128910247 (Comments: 1) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 119) | Ez a kettő kimaradt anno, de én nem merek nekiállni megrajzolni :) Budapest-Déli Református Egyházmegye Budapest-Északi Református Egyházmegye commented 2026-03-19 20:40:26 UTC by qstep ♦67 |
| 177387604 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180128666 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 20:33:46 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180128551 (Comments: 1) | Muzz17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Notes 4861220 and 4861216 commented 2026-03-19 20:28:03 UTC by Muzz17 ♦4 |
 | 180128474 (Comments: 1) | cMb3FJrpoSAb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-19 20:27:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180128230 (Comments: 1) | Sourabh Nandgaonkar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 20:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180128111 (Comments: 1) | Sounds Classic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 20:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178185802 (Comments: 1) | PappaSde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo PappaSde, ich habe mir mal den Änderungssatz angesehen, weil du die entsprechende Option beim hochladen angegeben hast. Was war denn das Ziel der Änderung? Der Änderungssatzkommentar ist für mich nicht ganz ein... commented 2026-03-19 20:06:07 UTC by Robert46798 ♦194 |
| 180127553 (Comments: 1) | Michelle Skinner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2309334410 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-19 20:05:23 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180127585 (Comments: 1) | Edible Arrangements (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:57:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180102842 (Comments: 1) | pientielsiu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao pientielsiu Benvenuto in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. Quindi hai 2 o... commented 2026-03-19 19:57:04 UTC by demon_box ♦387 |
| 180127365 (Comments: 1) | 500381930 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180115581 (Comments: 2) | Vervoordeldonk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Landuse losgemaakt van grens en dubbele vermelding sportclub verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-19 19:52:11 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180127268 (Comments: 1) | 500386509 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:48:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180127123 (Comments: 1) | Fabric Frenzy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:45:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
 | 179964345 (Comments: 1) | Hung159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Vui lòng sửa tuyến bus, hiện tại nó đã bị lỗi commented 2026-03-19 19:34:09 UTC by ZioDragon ♦25 |
 | 180125613 (Comments: 1) | maksovskij_348 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please leave comments in English or Georgian so other local editors can understand your changes. Also, the bus stop name should be in Georgian. commented 2026-03-19 19:34:03 UTC by Jk488 ♦16 |
| 180126568 (Comments: 1) | 500386167 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180126400 (Comments: 1) | 500386670 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 175976246 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 68) | Hi Can you give some background on the alt name for this feature: Way History: Boogiewoodro (1082392053)? It contains profanity. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-03-19 19:22:42 UTC by RVR015 ♦28 |
| 180098028 (Comments: 3) | Adikso (Discussed changesets: 5) | Na podstawie tego, że miały "lok." w housenumber, a powinny w unit \\s*/?\\s*lok(?:al)?\\s*\\.?\\s* commented 2026-03-19 19:19:22 UTC by Adikso ♦35 |
| 180104019 (Comments: 1) | Roman99983 (Discussed changesets: 1) | и зачем тут надпись "дом"? откачу commented 2026-03-19 19:16:27 UTC by literan ♦7,027 |
| 163666641 (Comments: 2) | os-emmer (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hansa-Flex is a chain of shops, that are specialised in selling hydraulic components. They Sell hoses, fittings and other related stuff. They also have some pneumatic (air pressure) components. But the focus is hydraulics. The products bought here ar... commented 2026-03-19 19:13:03 UTC by os-emmer ♦353 |
| 179827849 (Comments: 7) | Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456 commented 2026-03-19 18:48:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179828127 (Comments: 9) | Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456 commented 2026-03-19 18:47:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179827246 (Comments: 8) | Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456 commented 2026-03-19 18:47:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179985655 (Comments: 18) | Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456 commented 2026-03-19 18:47:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179887197 (Comments: 1) | PLGedit (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. I think this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489066596 was wrongly added to superroute relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7884303 commented 2026-03-19 18:46:23 UTC by qstep ♦67 |
| 180116698 (Comments: 1) | BreadEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравейте! Благодаря за редакциите! Името на училището обаче вече е отбелязано върху самата площ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135457909 Не е нужно... commented 2026-03-19 18:36:01 UTC by Fraxi ♦292 |
| 107949424 (Comments: 1) | FS Patagonia (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hola. ¿De dónde se sacaron los nombres de las calles rurales? commented 2026-03-19 18:34:19 UTC by Ciro03 ♦1 |
| 179969035 (Comments: 1) | Leajrrrr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 180124649 commented 2026-03-19 18:30:37 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 180123907 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 141) | Brakowało też jednego budyneczku. commented 2026-03-19 18:09:01 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦388 |
 | 180122117 (Comments: 1) | LICHUMBERTO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3057802210 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-19 18:00:41 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 169966024 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 157) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419710431 Should this read ref:IE:smr=LA018-008---- That is, there is a missing 'L'? commented 2026-03-19 17:58:58 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 141505031 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 318) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820275131 Could you check the ref:IE:smr=* for the tower house? commented 2026-03-19 17:45:56 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 148263028 (Comments: 1) | craghead (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257923809 Could you check the ref:IE:smr ? :D :giggle: commented 2026-03-19 17:43:06 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 180100196 (Comments: 1) | gially86 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hai intersecato gli edifici (occhio ai nodi che devono diventare grigi per indicare che sono uniti e che non si intersecano, inoltre guarda gli avvisi che ti da il programma prima di inviare l'edit) --- ... commented 2026-03-19 17:35:31 UTC by Antonino_Faro ♦5 |
| 180122408 (Comments: 2) | ItaliA1delSole (Discussed changesets: 24) | link 2: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.017510000000016&lng=9.132443800000033&z=18.36026451865086&pKey=1259520746220045&focus=photo&x=0.08948381570927061&y=0.4628983911307271&zoom=3 commented 2026-03-19 17:34:06 UTC by ItaliA1delSole ♦11 |
| 180118282 (Comments: 2) | 500382435 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 17:34:05 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180108439 (Comments: 2) | Ron’s Complete Auto Body (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 17:34:04 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179714366 (Comments: 2) | 500371997 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180122439 commented 2026-03-19 17:33:54 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179711106 (Comments: 2) | Lake Forest Pack & Ship (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122458 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:53 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179710504 (Comments: 2) | Skalitzky Culvert (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122456 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:52 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179708944 (Comments: 2) | Kanaaapp (Discussed changesets: 8) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122453 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:50 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179708758 (Comments: 2) | Kanaaapp (Discussed changesets: 8) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122451 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:49 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179708658 (Comments: 2) | Kanaaapp (Discussed changesets: 8) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122449 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:47 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179708509 (Comments: 2) | Kanaaapp (Discussed changesets: 8) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122446 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:46 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179708398 (Comments: 2) | Kanaaapp (Discussed changesets: 8) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122445 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:44 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179708222 (Comments: 2) | Shady Spring Dental Care Bluefied (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122444 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:43 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179708093 (Comments: 2) | Kanaaapp (Discussed changesets: 8) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122443 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:42 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179707649 (Comments: 2) | Express Lawn Care & Landscaping (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122441 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:41 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179706847 (Comments: 2) | 500371997 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122439 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:40 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179706727 (Comments: 2) | 500386242 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122438 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:37 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179706577 (Comments: 2) | 500385947 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122437 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:35 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179706287 (Comments: 2) | 500386077 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122434 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:34 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179705969 (Comments: 2) | AdpropMarketing (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179735770 commented 2026-03-19 17:33:33 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179704712 (Comments: 2) | Disk Baterias 24H (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179718020 commented 2026-03-19 17:33:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179704127 (Comments: 2) | 500385837 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122432 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:30 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179703763 (Comments: 2) | 500385325 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122430 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179703332 (Comments: 2) | 500380859 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122428 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:25 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179702569 (Comments: 2) | B&B Het Hemelsveld (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179714521 commented 2026-03-19 17:33:22 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179702021 (Comments: 2) | 500384946 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122426 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179701215 (Comments: 2) | 500385662 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122420 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179700222 (Comments: 2) | 500360688 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122417 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179693342 (Comments: 2) | LikeGugl (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122414 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179689107 (Comments: 2) | Rob Ault (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122413 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179686913 (Comments: 2) | B&B Het Hemelsveld (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement. commented 2026-03-19 17:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
 | 179681205 (Comments: 2) | Sukoon Coworking Space (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122403 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179680542 (Comments: 2) | Epax Solar GmbH (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179739999 commented 2026-03-19 17:33:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179677935 (Comments: 2) | hkmcincinnati (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179813253 commented 2026-03-19 17:33:03 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 180116434 (Comments: 1) | RikBreukelman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-19 17:29:50 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180121929 (Comments: 1) | 500383422 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 17:24:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180104541 (Comments: 1) | gially86 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hai intersecato gli edifici --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180104541 commented 2026-03-19 17:24:12 UTC by Antonino_Faro ♦5 |
| 179946068 (Comments: 1) | Максим Баранаускас (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revert of 179945147 commented 2026-03-19 17:15:54 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 146046820 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 318) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602724922/ Should this be ref:IE:smr=MO012-005---- ? :) commented 2026-03-19 17:13:03 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 180080195 (Comments: 1) | Klutz Cargo (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted this change. The correct course of action to is to change it to a path, and update the access tag to private which I did. I also added the fences and gates. OSM maps private roads all the time, if we just delete them people may re... commented 2026-03-19 17:09:17 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦96 |
| 180120302 (Comments: 1) | Liskwartier (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag Liskwartier, Is het niet gewoon access=private.. zowel op de poort als op het wegdeel. Mvg eggie commented 2026-03-19 17:00:11 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180070970 (Comments: 2) | ntzm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Adding FHRS IDs from https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhodot/ This change also included some other changes that I forgot to mention though commented 2026-03-19 16:59:31 UTC by ntzm ♦53 |
 | 161160762 (Comments: 2) | miklosakos (Discussed changesets: 13) | Dear martianfreeloader, thanks for the notice, and sorry for the late answer. Today I took a walk there, and I hold my opinion that they are garden allotments, although not very significant ones. See my remarks at the unresolved note pin. commented 2026-03-19 16:54:09 UTC by miklosakos ♦3 |
| 179936498 (Comments: 1) | RØSHØ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Are you sure this is the residential area and not the administrative boundary of Monte Mignone as there is an awful lot of farmland included in the area. Let us know as right now the tagging is flagged as incorrect to include a free... commented 2026-03-19 16:48:11 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,479 |
| 180063944 (Comments: 2) | PouLS_PL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Poza tym co to dokładnie za źródło "streetlevel imagery". Proszę doprecyzować. commented 2026-03-19 16:35:38 UTC by Szymson ♦479 |
| 180118651 (Comments: 1) | RomaKasian (Discussed changesets: 3) | sorry about wrong comment bcoz vespucci interface update i actually changed access to yes commented 2026-03-19 16:30:59 UTC by RomaKasian ♦2 |
| 180118937 (Comments: 2) | RomaKasian (Discussed changesets: 3) | i actually added footway commented 2026-03-19 16:29:45 UTC by RomaKasian ♦2 |
| 174834171 (Comments: 2) | szigyi222 (Discussed changesets: 6) | A helytelen módosítást a pontnál visszaállítottam. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180119334 commented 2026-03-19 16:24:33 UTC by balint36 ♦231 |
 | 179859844 (Comments: 1) | Mister_R2 (Discussed changesets: 29) | No kāda ortofoto tieši tu šo esi zīmējis? Šeit gandrīz viss ir nobīdīts par pārdesmit metriem, izskatās, ka uz ļoti šķībo Bing. Līdz šim viss bija iezīmēts precīzi pēc 7/8 LVM ortofoto. commented 2026-03-19 16:21:31 UTC by HellMap ♦847 |
| 177599806 (Comments: 2) | Mister_R2 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Šeit veikals divreiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339243889, šeit stāvvieta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472984150, šeit DUS https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487120155, šeit rotaļu laukums https://www.opens... commented 2026-03-19 16:17:48 UTC by HellMap ♦847 |
| 180094730 (Comments: 1) | camminatoreseriale (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ciao, come mai un edit così "massiccio" su queste strade? Dopotutto esse conducono in un luogo specifico, proprio come le altre della ZI Morigallo... commented 2026-03-19 16:17:06 UTC by EneaSuper ♦480 |
| 180114133 (Comments: 2) | Mike Glover (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mike Glover, please don't remove roads in areas behind gates, these are valid features if they still exist. "Restricted and gated area" is not a valid reason to remove them from OSM. Please use OSM access tags instead, thanks. commented 2026-03-19 16:17:03 UTC by MassCartog ♦335 |
| 180118527 (Comments: 1) | Thomas Trailers and Equipment (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 16:09:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179954248 (Comments: 1) | DLRN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Прошу прощения. Убирал с карты снесённые, этот случайно зацепил. commented 2026-03-19 16:05:42 UTC by Carto_Graph ♦64 |
| 179308006 (Comments: 10) | Patrick Harper (Discussed changesets: 11) | Perhaps more importantly, I would say that the presence of contradictory signs would generally make any stricter conditions imposed by the legislation unenforceable. So in practical terms here, the signage on the ground wins. commented 2026-03-19 15:58:30 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦302 |
| 180115850 (Comments: 1) | sibellephoto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. I am sure you had good intentions, however, changing the building itself is not the correct way. Don’t worry, we have fixed your edit. The photo agency is on the map here: https://www.openstreetmap.o... commented 2026-03-19 15:57:24 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 180115685 (Comments: 2) | (Engel)bert Bos (Discussed changesets: 15) | Gebouwen uitgelijnd mbv de BGT en wat infra toegevoegd commented 2026-03-19 15:55:28 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180053884 (Comments: 1) | viniwe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good point, but once something is already there on the ground, regardless of the access permissions, it’s allowed to stay. I’ve restored it. commented 2026-03-19 15:53:01 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,042 |
| 180093826 (Comments: 1) | Duški Kubov (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ahoj, kontajnery sa separovany odpad sa maju po spravnosti znacit ako amenity=recycling + recycling_type=container, vid OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=recycling Priklad na inspiraciu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/nod... commented 2026-03-19 15:50:11 UTC by t_ja ♦242 |
| 180117297 (Comments: 1) | cabotpsychologicalservice (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 15:45:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179771022 (Comments: 5) | Patrick Harper (Discussed changesets: 11) | BTW, source linked in source:highway anyway failed to indicate that this 1968 document was not revoked since then how do you know that it still applies? If you would be mapping official status in tag separate from highway remember to provide s... commented 2026-03-19 15:43:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180117252 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 599) | see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-we-prioritise-official-truth/142448 commented 2026-03-19 15:40:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180113140 (Comments: 3) | Vervoordeldonk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Als bovenstaand aangepast commented 2026-03-19 15:35:38 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 169700688 (Comments: 2) | Tom Ameye (Discussed changesets: 105) | Ik had dat wat aangepast in functie van de percelen die in eigendom zijn van het ANB. Welke percelen eigendom zijn van het ANB kan je zien op https://belevingskaart.natuurenbos.be/?zoomtoobject=175&findinlayer=18 Voel je vrij om het aan te pas... commented 2026-03-19 15:23:55 UTC by Tom Ameye ♦62 |
| 180116194 (Comments: 1) | Drake Law London (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 15:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178555730 (Comments: 3) | GurVJ (Discussed changesets: 9) | C'est pourtant ce que dit la requête overpass https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2mtx commented 2026-03-19 15:01:11 UTC by mga_geo ♦294 |
 | 180115359 (Comments: 1) | AllAroundVape Admin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 15:01:05 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179232015 (Comments: 5) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 117) | I strongly disagree with your claim that people use bicycle=dismount "in most cases seems to be to fool cycle routers to include illegal routes". Although some ambiguity exists in the use of the "bicycle" tag, there are wel... commented 2026-03-19 14:57:32 UTC by tomhukins ♦264 |
| 179708276 (Comments: 1) | Kanaaapp (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ahoj, vdaka, je super ked si firmy pridavaju informacie do mapy, dakujeme, idealne keby tak robili vsetci :). Len mala drobnost - pole "fixme" treba nabuduce nechat prazdne, lebo to sluzi na poznamky ze v mape treba nieco upresnit ci skontr... commented 2026-03-19 14:55:51 UTC by ticho2 ♦34 |
| 180111289 (Comments: 1) | Jesper Mortensen (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/747675738 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of ... commented 2026-03-19 14:46:17 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 177420609 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180111188 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 14:44:41 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 167889442 (Comments: 1) | da-werbung (Discussed changesets: 10) | Die Vorfahrt-Gewähren Schilder sollten nicht auf dem Kreuzungspunkt stehen. Hab es berichtigt commented 2026-03-19 14:43:43 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 163873808 (Comments: 2) | BrummsLee (Discussed changesets: 22) | O.k zu dem Zeitpunkt war da noch kein Kreisverkehr eingezeichnet, d.h. der Mapper hat die die Schilderin den Kreisverkehr gezogen. commented 2026-03-19 14:42:28 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 180112962 (Comments: 1) | Lishhgoyo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there Lishhgoyo, when I look at the aerial imagery, I don't see the regular building shapes that you have drawn here. In fact in many areas where you have drawn a building I see trees, and frequently when there are buildings, they look much s... commented 2026-03-19 14:37:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 180100116 (Comments: 1) | WaddenSeaMapping (Discussed changesets: 11) | hallo WaddenSeaMapping, Ik waardeer het zeer dat je alle wadden zo mooi detailleerd en up-to-date houdt, maar zou je mischien iets voorzichtiger willen zijn bij het bewerken van de kaart? Ik heb in een relatief korte tijd al twee keer kapotte ... commented 2026-03-19 14:27:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 178981276 (Comments: 4) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 73) | This changeset reverted in changeset 180112628. commented 2026-03-19 14:26:54 UTC by themapper53 ♦7 |
| 180107941 (Comments: 1) | Davide Dinosio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. Faccio fatica a capire il senso di queste modifiche. Mi puoi dire cosa volevi fare? Grazie, Andrea --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180107941 commented 2026-03-19 14:25:57 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,509 |
| 180112292 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 379) | fixed no tag node commented 2026-03-19 14:24:58 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
 | 180106634 (Comments: 1) | sr24cap (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Asi como los dibujaste saltan las herramientas de QA, o sea no esta bien y no lo van a mostrar como se pretende las herramientas que muestran edificios en 3D. Te va a convenir leer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings commented 2026-03-19 14:22:41 UTC by muralito ♦2,133 |
| 180106358 (Comments: 1) | sjaak4321 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De toren staat al als uitkijktoren gemapt op de kaart. De dubbele toevoeging verwijderd. MVG, Eggie Namens ... commented 2026-03-19 14:16:30 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177737097 (Comments: 1) | deHolger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bitte kein oneway=yes auf roundabout - das ist bereits implizit im roundabout enthalten. commented 2026-03-19 14:16:08 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 170894826 (Comments: 1) | Lepuse (Discussed changesets: 37) | 您好，中国大陆为什么要使用繁体字（正体字）？ commented 2026-03-19 14:11:17 UTC by HerryCFPL ♦7 |
| 180094473 (Comments: 1) | ciee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, warum hast du den Link von der Forschungsbrauerei gelöscht? Der geht noch und stimmt doch weiterhin commented 2026-03-19 14:07:28 UTC by Strubbl ♦574 |
| 165621602 (Comments: 3) | PCtrlV (Discussed changesets: 3) | Je vous invite à me contacter en privé pour définir un entretient téléphonique pour corriger ces erreurs d'éditions et en éviter de nouvelles. Cordialement, Yves commented 2026-03-19 13:50:51 UTC by pyrog ♦415 |
| 180049521 (Comments: 3) | Jvitegem (Discussed changesets: 33) | Het lijkt te gaan om 1 losse node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13658353962 commented 2026-03-19 13:48:24 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
 | 179143804 (Comments: 3) | Brian Kinnard (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again Please connect paths to each other when they are supposed to be connected. You often stop within a meter of a path close to another one. Be more accurate, please. When you map a path, you regulary makes a sharp turn to return throug... commented 2026-03-19 13:44:01 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 179384976 (Comments: 2) | dev1nius (Discussed changesets: 1) | @AlexSpritze Das ist korrekt. Einer unserer Fahrer war vor Ort. commented 2026-03-19 13:40:33 UTC by dev1nius ♦1 |
| 178605521 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 42) | thanks for your edits! one of these signs is not rendering propertly, see https://openrailwaymap.app/#view=18.4/-37.815463/144.966662&style=signals could you please confirm if this is a CBTC sign? if yes, we need to apply the same tags as ... commented 2026-03-19 13:39:44 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦468 |
| 180108502 (Comments: 1) | Cotelabarca (Discussed changesets: 11) | Buenos aportes. Entre imágenes de satélite Bing Maps y ESRI hay diferencia espacial y temporal. Esto no le resta precisión a la digitalización. Continua aportando. commented 2026-03-19 13:39:17 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 180107531 (Comments: 1) | Jhamille Moreira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8343422593 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-19 13:39:05 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180108444 (Comments: 1) | Olo Zfx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1301041958 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-19 13:39:05 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180107164 (Comments: 2) | SabrinaBUNDA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13018957557 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-19 13:39:00 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 180105837 (Comments: 1) | Awinograce (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3704900872 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-19 13:38:52 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180101556 (Comments: 1) | Bacosambu99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11406500788 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-19 13:38:41 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180095306 (Comments: 1) | zmarekz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4010646837 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-19 13:38:24 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180094788 (Comments: 1) | AdrianP41 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/617733493 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of ... commented 2026-03-19 13:38:17 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180062328 (Comments: 1) | Gaessje (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hallo, durch die veränderte Geometrie am kleinen Kreisel haben nun alle Bus-Routen, die dadurch führen Lücken oder überflüssige Stummel. Magst die Teilstücke im Kreisel noch an die Aus/Einfahrten anpassen? Gr&uu... commented 2026-03-19 13:36:03 UTC by onterof ♦23 |
| 180108381 (Comments: 1) | AutoScratch - Birmingham (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 13:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| X | 179908888 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 44) | If I remember right, these were outliers in a larger data set. commented 2026-03-19 13:15:56 UTC by Hypsometric ♦57 |
| 179657053 (Comments: 2) | Floriandediges (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je vois que vous avez ajouté access=no sur une relation multipolygone immense. Ce tag ne me paraît pas approprié et crée des erreurs. Qu'est-ce qui vous a motivé à faire cela ? Bonne journ&... commented 2026-03-19 13:14:48 UTC by Le Petit Léo ♦20 |
| 178190851 (Comments: 1) | njmccarthy11 (Discussed changesets: 4) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. your changesets are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. ----------... commented 2026-03-19 13:10:49 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 179983924 (Comments: 3) | Eero T (Discussed changesets: 2) | Selvä, kiitos tiedosta commented 2026-03-19 13:06:03 UTC by themapper53 ♦7 |
| 180096134 (Comments: 4) | bobbert123 (Discussed changesets: 16) | wat gek, dat had ik in de tag goed gezet, maar niet daarboven bij 'drinkbaar'. heeft ie dan niet overgenomen blijkbaar. nu staat ie goed commented 2026-03-19 12:59:56 UTC by bobbert123 ♦16 |
| X | 179937608 (Comments: 1) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, why this new relation? It seems a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/304751, which already has a full border. Please consider removing this duplicated relation. commented 2026-03-19 12:57:07 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦40 |
| 145846629 (Comments: 1) | TFI71 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Burde disse "uformelle" stier hen til vandvejsadgangpunkter måske hellere være 'footway=link'? Altså hvis de ikke ses i virkeligheden, men er tilføjet af hensyn til ruteberegning. commented 2026-03-19 12:55:58 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦121 |
| 180061286 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 118) | Revert of 180060287 commented 2026-03-19 12:44:20 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180106498 (Comments: 1) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 152) | The erroneous armchair mapping was also in changeset 177558392. commented 2026-03-19 12:39:01 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,019 |
| 180102740 (Comments: 1) | ucukor (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490512773#map=19/53.909422/27.587056 Насколько знаю, если highway=crossing, crossing=* уже имеется как точка, то не надо ещё мапить crossing=* на том же ... commented 2026-03-19 12:34:39 UTC by HantDX ♦55 |
| 180105537 (Comments: 1) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | Por favor, lea los comentarios: no use «wikidata» ni «wikipedia» par a las marcas; use «brand:wikidata» y «brand:wikipedia». Las descripciones promocionales se eliminarán. No use descripci... commented 2026-03-19 12:34:00 UTC by dcapillae ♦397 |
| 180087758 (Comments: 1) | fred80gps (Discussed changesets: 3) | I think place=hamlet is perfect tag for kampong. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Malaysia/Other_tagging_aspects commented 2026-03-19 12:32:13 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 180042120 (Comments: 1) | IKYuda (Discussed changesets: 7) | Harap wilayah suntingan dalam lingkup daerah kemudian save. commented 2026-03-19 12:27:44 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 180105742 (Comments: 1) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 23) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180105742 commented 2026-03-19 12:20:32 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180072796 (Comments: 1) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thank you! commented 2026-03-19 12:13:43 UTC by jayaddison ♦12 |
| 180016121 (Comments: 2) | IanAD123 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also, you might wonder how do people know what has changed in the area, there's a handy tool for that: https://tyrasd.github.io/latest-changes/#12/52.5833/-0.2682 commented 2026-03-19 12:08:13 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 180071797 (Comments: 1) | LandskapsLars (Discussed changesets: 3) | Jeg anbefaler at du bruker mer beskrivende kommentarer av endringer enn bare "Stuff". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-03-19 12:00:15 UTC by JakubS ♦27 |
| 180076660 (Comments: 1) | LandskapsLars (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-03-19 11:58:46 UTC by JakubS ♦27 |
| 179648420 (Comments: 1) | Bakker Joop (Discussed changesets: 5) | ..shop=tailor bestaat ook en rendert wel. Groet, eggie commented 2026-03-19 11:57:52 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 115833208 (Comments: 1) | pantufla (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hello. Are you sure this is a desert here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018767752 commented 2026-03-19 11:57:20 UTC by qstep ♦67 |
| 180093958 (Comments: 1) | AlexeyKass (Discussed changesets: 6) | Здравствуйте. Данная правка вносим множество несоответствий и ошибок. Выравнивайте пожалуйста спутниковую подложку перед редактир... commented 2026-03-19 11:48:48 UTC by pesec ♦309 |
| 177898120 (Comments: 1) | kamillz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hej kamillz De enkelte ladestandere bør tagges som man_made=charge_point mens den samlede ladestation, der kan have flere ladestandere, er amenity=charging_station Jeg plejer at tegne amenity=charging_station som en polygon, men ... commented 2026-03-19 11:42:10 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦35 |
| 180081710 (Comments: 1) | Zaneo (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thanks for the updates - the shape one of the ways seems unexpected after the edits; could you take a look? It is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434879816 commented 2026-03-19 11:41:44 UTC by jayaddison ♦12 |
 | 179752192 (Comments: 1) | mappOG (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, could you check these edits? There are 8 ways with many foreign tags: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2mt5 commented 2026-03-19 11:35:37 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 177974474 (Comments: 2) | njmccarthy11 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I forgot to mention that you first need to draw a line over the shoulders of the track of which you want to measure the width. Best regards commented 2026-03-19 11:34:40 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 179726812 (Comments: 1) | VLD322 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, could you check these crossings? "crossing:lines" is not used in other places, and the combination doesn't make sense: crossing:lines = no crossing:markings = lines commented 2026-03-19 11:26:45 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179718522 (Comments: 1) | judithmurage (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, could you check the points you added recently? - 'bed' should be 'beds' - 'toilet' should be 'toilets' - 'healthcare:speciality' should be used with the values documented in the Wi... commented 2026-03-19 11:24:23 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179895982 (Comments: 1) | volgspot (Discussed changesets: 12) | Beste volgspot, Wat is je bron voor het plaatsen van deze hoogzitten. Er zijn wat twijfels over de hoogzitten rondom Haaksbergen. Zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nieuwe-mapper-verwijdert-data-uit-osm/99681/62 MVG eggi... commented 2026-03-19 11:19:14 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180042294 (Comments: 4) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 42) | Die Gleise nicht (außer die wurden letztens bemalt) - ich mein die Mitglieder von r27116, in denen die von dir bearbeiteten Routen wiederum Mitglieder sind. commented 2026-03-19 11:16:57 UTC by hlfan ♦91 |
| 178965315 (Comments: 4) | nogz7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | @santamariense Please create a DWG report for the user. I am unable to revert all the changes with my current tools. Thanks! commented 2026-03-19 11:11:52 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 180033267 (Comments: 1) | Servando S Tio III (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 180033190 commented 2026-03-19 11:08:22 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180102400 (Comments: 1) | Misuki (Discussed changesets: 1) | I added some extra nodes to the sidewalk so I can later specify the surfaces properly. commented 2026-03-19 11:07:26 UTC by Misuki ♦1 |
| 178642509 (Comments: 1) | Jordi MF_import (Discussed changesets: 16) | El Conservatori Superior «Joaquín Rodrigo» és una altra institució. Actualment, es troba al carrer de Ricardo Muñoz Suay. Crec que cal eliminar les addicions associades a aquest conjunt de canvis. commented 2026-03-19 11:06:52 UTC by terpnos ♦1 |
| 180094666 (Comments: 6) | Mapperwj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lastig met luchtfoto's te checken. Met Obliek van Slagboom en Peter zie ik in een open stuk een soort hut. Dat zal geen hoogzit zijn. Je zult zelf het beste weten wat het zijn. Wanneer het hutten betreft dan kan het object geta... commented 2026-03-19 11:01:12 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180056861 (Comments: 1) | WestFoxID (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180102277 commented 2026-03-19 11:00:35 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180085504 (Comments: 1) | zhr0913 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to the OpenStreetMap community! Consider writing changeset comments: without any comment it is very difficult to review modifications. Here you could for instance have said “Adding height to building and surface to ... commented 2026-03-19 10:59:25 UTC by Martin Constantino–Bodin ♦127 |
| 180064532 (Comments: 1) | Antonio Angelozzi (Discussed changesets: 1) | l'area è solo dismessa o ospita un cantiere di costruzione? commented 2026-03-19 10:49:01 UTC by LorenzoPesci ♦70 |
| 152215418 (Comments: 1) | Ferviarg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola! quería comentarte sobre los puentes peatonales. Por ejemplo en el boulevard san juan. Yo veo en las imágenes que son veredas que son parte de la calle. No sería mejor etiquetar la calle como sidewalk=both/right/left? Porque... commented 2026-03-19 10:45:07 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦144 |
| 178348355 (Comments: 2) | bluestarfish (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Another remark. There’s no need to map every short section of trail that branches off from another trail and leads to a few huts, especially if those huts are visible from the other trail. Best regards commented 2026-03-19 10:43:56 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 179959574 (Comments: 1) | Cristoffs (Discussed changesets: 139) | Czy na pewno cały odcinek drogi jest o nawierzchni asfaltowej? commented 2026-03-19 10:40:31 UTC by Rach_UMK ♦5 |
| 180100728 (Comments: 1) | Arsenii09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | *агрогородок Снитово commented 2026-03-19 10:33:21 UTC by Arsenii09 ♦1 |
| 174218767 (Comments: 1) | Pepe Sánchez de Wu (Discussed changesets: 13) | Buen día! Quería comentar sobre el agregado de restricciones y las veredas. Lo que se ve en las fotos del puente y del boulevard san juan es que tiene las veredas como parte de la calle. No hay un puente separado para la senda peatonal... commented 2026-03-19 10:29:26 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦144 |
| 180059914 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 75) | Changed 40T/56' restriction to 18T/30' based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180100504 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-19 10:18:19 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦69 |
| X | 179850453 (Comments: 2) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 74) | This was supposed to be two changesets, but it looks like JOSM didn't close the first. Apologies! commented 2026-03-19 10:17:57 UTC by whammo ♦92 |
| 180097288 (Comments: 1) | Staphorster (Discussed changesets: 9) | Feedback Dag Staphorster. Denk dat dit inderdaad beter is. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-19 10:11:22 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 158360164 (Comments: 2) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 102) | Sometimes im not sure what is only a advertising text and what is the name because u don't speak french. So better let put the name who knows it. Other possibility is i just pass quickly and not time to add it because name too long and... commented 2026-03-19 09:57:55 UTC by 5R-MFT ♦85 |
| 177689232 (Comments: 4) | Daccordi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke Carsten für die Korrektur. Am Ende der Fahrradbahn bei der Industriestrasse, hatte ich vergessen die Anbindung an die Industriestrasse auch in der Relation Fahrradbahn zu ergänzen / zu korrigieren. Da habe ich jetzt noch nachgetragen.... commented 2026-03-19 09:56:37 UTC by Loth ♦18 |
| 179981688 (Comments: 1) | WFDaniel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Salut. Nu mai folosi imaginile bing in zona Buzaului si in general. Sunt cele mai vechi si sunt prost pozitionate de cele mai multe ori. Utilizeaza ESRI standard. Cladirile desenate de tine dupa imaginile Bing sunt deplasate. O zi buna! commented 2026-03-19 09:46:12 UTC by rarad74 ♦441 |
| 166580831 (Comments: 2) | gnlpfth (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hallo, die Form Weg + Parzelle ist tatsächlich die offizielle Addresse. Also wenn dann voranstellen. Weg und Parzelle in addr:unit zu parken wäre denkbar, aber dann ist die Trennung der Adressebenen hin, dafür hat man add... commented 2026-03-19 09:37:46 UTC by gnlpfth ♦81 |
| 178912588 (Comments: 1) | Brian Kinnard (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please solve the issues / warnings shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings. About the tagging of highways, traces as narrow as <2 mtr are not an unclassified highway. Use the tag: path. T... commented 2026-03-19 09:34:03 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 180098131 (Comments: 1) | Cabot Psychological Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 09:30:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 165210934 (Comments: 3) | dafadllyn (Discussed changesets: 29) | Are they selling some specific type of stuff or everything from fridges and toasters through smartphone and shoes to spices, windows, homewares and pens? commented 2026-03-19 09:19:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179462571 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi am Altenauer Weg sind nur unter der Brücke Radwege. commented 2026-03-19 09:10:08 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 180096479 (Comments: 3) | Cheezum (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #180096886 Neem svp contact op met de lokale OV mapper of met de OV mappers op het forum. https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43 Het is niet juist om van residential allemaal busways te maken. dat geeft... commented 2026-03-19 09:03:39 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179804472 (Comments: 2) | alokchauhan_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Roydon Olive, I’m Alok, a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thanks for reaching out. Based on Lyft-owned aerial imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YJpMEQm6Rk6IA6Nnun5rIg-FtmNTAgXV/view?usp=sharing) from October 2025, construction a... commented 2026-03-19 08:49:39 UTC by alokchauhan_Lyft ♦4 |
| 180094805 (Comments: 2) | Dirk Leon Schut (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoe vaak staat dat paaltje gewoon in het wegdek. Alleen als het markt is? commented 2026-03-19 08:48:14 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180052385 (Comments: 3) | bobbert123 (Discussed changesets: 16) | eggie, ik denk dat ie pomp aardig goed staat nu mvg Bob commented 2026-03-19 08:46:22 UTC by bobbert123 ♦16 |
| 178378927 (Comments: 2) | pandamahoniowa (Discussed changesets: 9) | Powinno być poprawione tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180095776 commented 2026-03-19 08:36:24 UTC by pandamahoniowa ♦7 |
| 180094936 (Comments: 1) | Mapperwj (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #180095687 due removing lots of data commented 2026-03-19 08:34:22 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177438949 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180095422 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-19 08:33:49 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 83690969 (Comments: 3) | Sultanstrail (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Tomas, Thank you for your kind message. You are right about this track. I tried to delete it but it seems locked and I could not delete it. I do not know how to fix this problem. You can delete is if you can. Best regards, Sedat commented 2026-03-19 08:32:40 UTC by Sultanstrail ♦2 |
| 179953471 (Comments: 4) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | geändert. commented 2026-03-19 08:21:16 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 180080457 (Comments: 2) | En Zwo Oh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Perfekt, danke vielmals :-) commented 2026-03-19 08:19:12 UTC by En Zwo Oh ♦1 |
| 177307611 (Comments: 13) | C_1965 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ob die Antworten im Forum nun eine repräsentative Meinung widerspiegeln, sei mal dahingestellt, aber ich war durchaus überrascht, dass es keine einzige Gegenansicht gab. Damit hätte ich nicht gerechnet. Wobei ich mir auch nicht sicher ... commented 2026-03-19 08:18:24 UTC by MarkusHD ♦179 |
| 176606680 (Comments: 1) | anonym33 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ciao anonym33 Gemäss https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pistes würde ich Pisten generell keinen Namen vergeben, der nur eine Zahl ist, sonder diese Zahl in `ref` oder `piste:ref` verpacken. Gruss, habi commented 2026-03-19 07:59:55 UTC by habi ♦2,059 |
| 179906208 (Comments: 2) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | abgeändert. commented 2026-03-19 07:59:36 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 180046489 (Comments: 2) | Vincio11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, chiedo scusa, non sapevo la questione delle geometrie e dei civici. Le geometrie erano molto interconnesse e non riuscivo ad ottenere il risultato corretto senza stravolgere anche quelle vicine. Starò più attento la prossima vo... commented 2026-03-19 07:53:57 UTC by Vincio11 ♦1 |
| 180033807 (Comments: 1) | eeweitongyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id 180094309 commented 2026-03-19 07:50:49 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 178625661 (Comments: 1) | EftimiSto1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, ho annullato questa modifica perché sono stati eliminati tutti i nomi dalle fermate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180094162 Dal changeset non capisco se sia una cosa intenzionale oppure un difetto di mapcomplete, quindi... commented 2026-03-19 07:44:42 UTC by Mannivu ♦260 |
| 179954294 (Comments: 4) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Alles klar. Vielen Dank für die Aufklärung und Unterstützung. VG commented 2026-03-19 07:43:13 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 8390094 (Comments: 3) | Michael_Stellichte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, die Planetenorte sind auf dem 'Radweg' markiert. Damit werden die Abstände innerhalb unsere Planetensystems im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes erfahrbar. Ich müsste noch mal nachschauen, ob die Markierungen in der Zwischenzeit... commented 2026-03-19 07:38:06 UTC by Michael_Stellichte ♦1 |
| 180064437 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 79) | Revert of 180039017 commented 2026-03-19 07:32:05 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180077221 (Comments: 1) | Dirk Leon Schut (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-19 07:24:32 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180071606 (Comments: 1) | Lisanne1408 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback .. source=BAG hersteld MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-19 07:22:58 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180092406 (Comments: 1) | Andrzej Jarmoniuk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag Andrzej Jarmoniuk, Een officetag heb ik toegevoegd ivm rendering. Format phone aangepast +31 Gr eggie commented 2026-03-19 07:20:34 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180079862 (Comments: 2) | Dirk Leon Schut (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik heb het weer routeerbaar gemaakt. en het fietsverbod verwijderd. Ook een paar voetgangersverbindingen gemaakt. Apart ingetekende trottoirs levert anders enorme omwegen op. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-19 07:05:39 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180092868 (Comments: 1) | spam46200 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Źródłem godzin otwarcia jest dodana w tym zestawie zmian strona internetowa. commented 2026-03-19 06:57:28 UTC by spam46200 ♦11 |
 | 180049753 (Comments: 1) | AlhassaneDiallo (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi AlhassaneDiallo, your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-10.51017&lat=11.97902&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabr... commented 2026-03-19 06:36:00 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 180061375 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 118) | Revert of 180060054 commented 2026-03-19 06:35:36 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180005037 (Comments: 1) | AlhassaneDiallo (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi AlhassaneDiallo, your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-9.36482&lat=10.71872&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabri... commented 2026-03-19 06:35:04 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 180000710 (Comments: 1) | AlhassaneDiallo (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi AlhassaneDiallo, your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-9.36482&lat=10.71872&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabri... commented 2026-03-19 06:34:58 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 179238270 (Comments: 1) | Hiedy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180091865 --- ... commented 2026-03-19 06:34:37 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179239360 (Comments: 2) | Baghi@47 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180091630 --- ... commented 2026-03-19 06:27:46 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180033932 (Comments: 4) | Rubenke (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hier nog een forumdraadje.. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hoe-kan-natuurmonumenten-het-beste-omgaan-met-ongewenste-paden/93583?page=2 commented 2026-03-19 06:23:17 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179242535 (Comments: 1) | Shijuka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180091395#map=19/14.389876/79.9554... commented 2026-03-19 06:22:49 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179303329 (Comments: 1) | Arja Apuroop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-19 06:19:59 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179729583 (Comments: 1) | Deekshitha12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-03-19 06:19:14 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 179733538 (Comments: 2) | renuuu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check subsequent updates --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-03-19 06:17:55 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180045737 (Comments: 1) | tmvlk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180091179 commented 2026-03-19 06:17:13 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179738357 (Comments: 1) | Sunil muddana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). It would be good if you can add number of charging bays. --- ... commented 2026-03-19 06:15:28 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
| 180019624 (Comments: 2) | sai_sahithya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check subsequent updates including mine https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180090629<... commented 2026-03-19 06:04:10 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦708 |
 | 180090468 (Comments: 1) | Dongchuni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 06:00:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
 | 180078226 (Comments: 1) | SedemOSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | That’s a big survey commented 2026-03-19 05:56:37 UTC by ilias_ ♦417 |
| 180039901 (Comments: 1) | 子豪 陈 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 不确定你能看得到我说话吗，但我的判断是你看不到。 commented 2026-03-19 05:53:04 UTC by Taksine ♦152 |
| 180089701 (Comments: 1) | dghdhngdfjkdn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13335150899, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5279568149 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move t... commented 2026-03-19 05:51:44 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180074872 (Comments: 1) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 81) | Revert of 180070218 commented 2026-03-19 05:47:38 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180035596 (Comments: 1) | Natyyyyy1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset 180089750 commented 2026-03-19 05:42:09 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180075479 (Comments: 2) | Rock Run Events (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 05:33:40 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180075210 (Comments: 2) | 500374057 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 05:33:39 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180071171 (Comments: 2) | 500383561 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 05:33:39 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179672845 (Comments: 2) | Regent Restoration Denton (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089548 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:34 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179668337 (Comments: 2) | hkmbirmingham (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179813230 commented 2026-03-19 05:33:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179663715 (Comments: 2) | ED Performance (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179663913 commented 2026-03-19 05:33:30 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179662032 (Comments: 2) | Maclean Of Duart Enterprises (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089546 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179661041 (Comments: 2) | Dallas Mastic (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179661563 commented 2026-03-19 05:33:26 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179660525 (Comments: 2) | 15283313 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089540 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:26 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179660387 (Comments: 2) | 500384388 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089539 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:25 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179660273 (Comments: 2) | 500385523 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089537 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:24 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179658704 (Comments: 2) | Panaderia y Tienda Guadalajara 3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089533 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179660083 (Comments: 2) | 500385112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089534 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179657957 (Comments: 2) | 500381413 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089528 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179657505 (Comments: 2) | 500382012 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089526 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179657762 (Comments: 2) | 500383852 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089527 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179657352 (Comments: 2) | 500385601 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089525 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:18 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179657005 (Comments: 2) | 10108521 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089523 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179656741 (Comments: 2) | 500385256 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089522 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179656506 (Comments: 2) | AirTec Heating (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089521 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179656211 (Comments: 2) | 500385324 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089520 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179656066 (Comments: 2) | 500385375 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089519 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179655734 (Comments: 2) | 500384017 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089516 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179655551 (Comments: 2) | 500377824 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089515 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179654459 (Comments: 2) | 500374490 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089513 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:09 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179652573 (Comments: 2) | Alpha Movers (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement. commented 2026-03-19 05:33:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179859693 (Comments: 2) | vietnam321 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Chào bạn. Không phải là mình dùng thẻ tên trước sáp nhập, mà những tên này là tên của đô thị theo nguồn mà mình đã dẫn t... commented 2026-03-19 05:20:48 UTC by vietnam321 ♦13 |
| 179981524 (Comments: 1) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi ajmat, Was this revert triggered by my comment on the original changeset, or did you stumble on it by yourself? I would have given the user a little more time to reply before to revert the edit. I know it becomes more complicated with time,... commented 2026-03-19 04:49:18 UTC by Totor ♦75 |
| 179913446 (Comments: 2) | TWENTY123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Twenty123, Your edit has been reverted by another mapper: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179981524 Don't let this discourage you from trying again, maybe with smaller changes at first. If you need any help don't hesi... commented 2026-03-19 04:44:24 UTC by Totor ♦75 |
| 180085491 (Comments: 1) | Loch Memorial Reserve (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think you added a duplicate defibrillator here and I have deleted the duplicate. Let me know if there are in fact two of them at this location. commented 2026-03-19 04:19:38 UTC by nevw ♦2,173 |
| 179905419 (Comments: 1) | pvwheatley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please note that private driveways should still be mapped on OSM, as we have a practice of "map whats on the ground", regardless of if it is private or public property. Private driveways should instead be given the tag of acce... commented 2026-03-19 04:12:40 UTC by maxwellward ♦13 |
| 178980159 (Comments: 2) | 米沙商店 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you explain the reason for using the same email address and phone contact information across different POIs? commented 2026-03-19 03:57:22 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦38 |
| 179543424 (Comments: 1) | lebedits (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hey, looks like you have 7 warnings flagged by the editor on this changeset (roads disconnected from the main road network, roads crossing each other and buildings). Please try to resolve those before uploading, unless the warnings are inaccurate. I&... commented 2026-03-19 03:51:14 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 180080302 (Comments: 1) | Th3eit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. And address isn't "demolished" so don't add demolished prefixes to those tags. I've added them back on the building. Thanks! commented 2026-03-19 03:46:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 179922518 (Comments: 1) | Jeampier 6633 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180085875 commented 2026-03-19 03:02:30 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 178508065 (Comments: 1) | vogelfreier (Discussed changesets: 102) | Hey, I've corrected the buildings here as they didn't match very well with reality. You can use OSMUK cadastral parcels to see where the terraced houses should be split. Also, building=house + house=terrace should be used instead of buildin... commented 2026-03-19 03:01:43 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
 | 180085356 (Comments: 1) | jonierstiven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13657210683 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-19 02:55:01 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179912555 (Comments: 1) | ckesca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:180085695 commented 2026-03-19 02:48:56 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180066276 (Comments: 1) | NETH-JAN (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, selecionaste erróneamente el tipo de área, debió ser "barrio", el que seleccionaste es uno propio del Reino Unido y no hay algo parecido en Bolivia. Lo mejor es añadir un punto en el centro de todo e... commented 2026-03-19 02:38:38 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,654 |
| 179498329 (Comments: 2) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 13) | 👀 commented 2026-03-19 01:54:18 UTC by tguen ♦107 |
| 180083760 (Comments: 1) | HenryEK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Again, please use `route_ref=` instead of abusing `network=`. commented 2026-03-19 01:49:03 UTC by kingkingHK ♦268 |
| 180049847 (Comments: 2) | ariesyy (Discussed changesets: 1) | 感谢指出 commented 2026-03-19 01:24:26 UTC by ariesyy ♦1 |
| 136918299 (Comments: 2) | treestryder (Discussed changesets: 29) | <shrug> The output was likely fat fingered. I must have been in a hurry, because at the time the practice was to use the official name of the Supercharger, "New Springfield, OH - Mahoning Valley Service Plaza" in this case (... commented 2026-03-19 01:12:22 UTC by treestryder ♦185 |
| 179884078 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Revert of 179882859 commented 2026-03-19 00:50:48 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179965539 (Comments: 1) | impiaaa (Discussed changesets: 27) | Partially Revert of 179882859 commented 2026-03-19 00:50:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 156498299 (Comments: 1) | ERIC JAOUEN (Discussed changesets: 22) | Pensez à bien inclure le name=* lors de l’ajout de commerce pour vos futures contribution. Art Danse Studio. Celui-ci est bien visible sur la devanture. commented 2026-03-19 00:16:54 UTC by Brickelt963 ♦8 |
| 180064971 (Comments: 1) | Cotelabarca (Discussed changesets: 11) | Buenos aportes. Continua con la misma motivación. commented 2026-03-19 00:08:57 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 180065247 (Comments: 1) | Cotelabarca (Discussed changesets: 11) | Buenos aportes. Elegiste una zona compleja de edificios. Dibuja con la mejor geometría los edificios. Continua con tus aportes. commented 2026-03-19 00:05:49 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 158360166 (Comments: 2) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 102) | Le commerce a été supprimé au profit de son doublon + récent. commented 2026-03-19 00:05:13 UTC by Brickelt963 ♦8 |
| 180076510 (Comments: 1) | Alejandro Martinez F (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buenos aportes. Por favor considere ESCUADRAR (tecla Q) para mejorar la geometría de los edificios. Continue con sus aportes. commented 2026-03-19 00:00:58 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 180062181 (Comments: 1) | Cotelabarca (Discussed changesets: 11) | Buenos aportes. Considere aplicar ESCUADRAR (tecla Q) para mejorar la geometría de los edificios. Continue con sus aportes. commented 2026-03-18 23:56:44 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 180061669 (Comments: 1) | Cotelabarca (Discussed changesets: 11) | Muy buenos aportes. Continua contribuyendo a OpenStreetMap. commented 2026-03-18 23:53:39 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 180076136 (Comments: 1) | rmendozar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buenos aportes. Considere que ALTURA (height) de los edificios, pueden ser obtenidos de mejor manera con mediciones, por ejemplo UAV. Con el dato de NIVELES (building:levels) es suficiente. Continua con tus aportes. commented 2026-03-18 23:50:46 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 180079713 (Comments: 1) | Tatiana_9 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Muy buenos aportes. Continua con tus aportes. commented 2026-03-18 23:44:58 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 180063815 (Comments: 1) | Cotelabarca (Discussed changesets: 11) | Muy buenos aportes. Lo único, aplicar ESCUADRAR en edificios geométricos. Continua con tus aportes. commented 2026-03-18 23:40:22 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 180024248 (Comments: 2) | TheRealMattRogers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for letting me know! I have made the correction on the home address to S 4th Drive. I appreciate the help for a first-time editor! :) commented 2026-03-18 23:38:41 UTC by TheRealMattRogers ♦1 |
| 180082944 (Comments: 1) | Dentaserv Dental Clinic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 23:33:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180057465 (Comments: 1) | Kancelaria podatkowa ibiuro24 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:opening_hours commented 2026-03-18 23:21:12 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦417 |
| X | 180061357 (Comments: 1) | FHS_maps (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello again, You added a few unsquared buildings to Wales and... "Epstein's Secret Bunker" and "Epsteins Cellar" on that island. I'm not sure that any of these are part of the hotosm task you're workin... commented 2026-03-18 23:09:45 UTC by ceirios ♦97 |
| 172764531 (Comments: 1) | alami8 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13189415555/history has shop = hypermarket that was added in this edit shop=hypermarket ? Why not shop=supermarket? Is there some difference? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=supermarket commented 2026-03-18 23:05:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 176860366 (Comments: 1) | Violante Agostino (Discussed changesets: 1) | It seems you removed the house numbers from a lot of objects and made the addresses be a separate point. Why? commented 2026-03-18 23:04:13 UTC by xankco ♦1 |
| 180079860 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 119) | as posted ABOVE your comment commented 2026-03-18 22:52:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180037998 (Comments: 1) | DMisterS644 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I changed the road back to an alley. According to the OSM WIki, that is the correct tag for the way. I'll send you a message with more info about OSM and a link to the wiki. Let me know if you have any questions. --- ... commented 2026-03-18 22:43:51 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 180038288 (Comments: 1) | DMisterS644 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I removed the address node you added because the house already is tagged with the same address. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180038288 commented 2026-03-18 22:42:43 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 180072462 (Comments: 1) | willy_wonka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, can you please use a more descriptive changeset description than just "improvements"? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some more information --- Published usin... commented 2026-03-18 22:37:38 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,493 |
| 137247150 (Comments: 1) | Mareček (Discussed changesets: 6) | 'permit' value means that basically everyone gets the permit, just needs to ask for it at some authority. That probably isn't the case here, if it is a private property of the school, it does not give drive through permits to general p... commented 2026-03-18 22:26:22 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,819 |
| 145145665 (Comments: 1) | Grintovec (Discussed changesets: 9) | You still haven't fixed these invalid "fixes" in Bratislava, as explained in other changesets. commented 2026-03-18 22:24:14 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,819 |
| 179416618 (Comments: 2) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 45) | clearly wrong, I'm sorry. commented 2026-03-18 21:38:54 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 180077465 (Comments: 1) | L0De (Discussed changesets: 1) | "drobne aktualizacje" to nie jest dobry opis zestawu zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-18 21:36:54 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦831 |
| 177866760 (Comments: 1) | maciejnet (Discussed changesets: 5) | "opole" to nie jest dobry opis zestawu zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-18 21:35:52 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦831 |
| 180078368 (Comments: 1) | maciejnet (Discussed changesets: 5) | "aktualizacja" to nie jest dobry opis zestawu zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-18 21:35:39 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦831 |
| 179819586 (Comments: 12) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | I don't think so. Thank you for the revert! commented 2026-03-18 21:23:15 UTC by riiga ♦92 |
| 180079146 (Comments: 1) | Luke Barrett (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6346970772 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-18 21:14:33 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180079345 (Comments: 1) | 500383420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 21:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180079189 (Comments: 1) | 500384183 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 21:09:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 177475807 (Comments: 9) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 452) | Można ten link do githuba? commented 2026-03-18 21:08:34 UTC by maro21 ♦832 |
| 180037805 (Comments: 1) | Aswini Mahendran (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Th... commented 2026-03-18 21:03:47 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦181 |
| 180079029 (Comments: 1) | 500386178 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 21:03:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 177472234 (Comments: 1) | Mtrelaguite (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Mtrelaguite ! Félicitations et merci pour avoir ajouté votre commerce sur OSM ! Je me suis permis de retoucher vos contributions (vous aviez par mégarde déplacé la Rue de la Gaieté et le bur... commented 2026-03-18 20:50:51 UTC by CapitaineMoustache ♦48 |
| 177497586 (Comments: 2) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180078642 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 20:47:25 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 146808446 (Comments: 1) | SNT_Geolocalisation (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243979120/history has shop = épicerie that was added in this edit shop=épicerie ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from htt... commented 2026-03-18 20:46:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180078264 (Comments: 1) | rgmamani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9867065296 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-18 20:41:30 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180000000 (Comments: 7) | joshua abaho3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Congrats on submitting Changeset 180000000!! 🎉🎉🎉 commented 2026-03-18 20:40:00 UTC by DawsZed ♦22 |
| 180066430 (Comments: 2) | giggie (Discussed changesets: 12) | Danke für den Hinweis zu den Haupttags. Tatsächlich schreibt auch das OSM-Wiki davon, dass barrier-Tags nicht auf Flächen angewendet werden sollen, das war mir so bislang nicht bekannt. Ich passe es entsprechend an. commented 2026-03-18 20:38:38 UTC by giggie ♦7 |
| 179974810 (Comments: 1) | ITALIANO_ADAMO (Discussed changesets: 1) | surface=sand/gravel/stones nie będzie poprawnie interpretowane przez aplikacje. Lepiej dać bardziej ogólne określenie lub podzielić drogę na mniejsze odcinki i każdemu dać inną nawierzchnię. commented 2026-03-18 20:23:44 UTC by maro21 ♦832 |
| 179966950 (Comments: 3) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 186) | W edycji były edytowane dwa obiekty: przeciągnięty przypadkiem węzeł - może zdarzyć się każdemu, częściej początkującym. Druga edycja to dodanie nawierzchni drodze, która nie budzi wątpliwości. Byłem w trakcie naprawy przeciąg... commented 2026-03-18 20:22:33 UTC by maro21 ♦832 |
| 179974469 (Comments: 4) | NGL-engel (Discussed changesets: 102) | Wo du Recht hast, hast du recht. Danke commented 2026-03-18 20:19:25 UTC by NGL-engel ♦113 |
| 179606116 (Comments: 1) | zebda78 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 commented 2026-03-18 20:16:33 UTC by catonano ♦28 |
| 179995286 (Comments: 2) | Escapade6850 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It would also be nice to know what is now at the old location too if any :) commented 2026-03-18 20:15:43 UTC by Enock4seth ♦615 |
| 180061418 (Comments: 2) | HenriSaucisse (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hola! claro, es solo el nombre del club pero no de la cancha. gracias por la corrección. commented 2026-03-18 20:09:55 UTC by HenriSaucisse ♦8 |
| 180065213 (Comments: 1) | giggie (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi :) falls du mal am Sportgelände vorbei kommst, könntest du mal gucken was mit dem Minigolf und dem Spielplatz ist. Auf den letzten Luftbildern ist da nämlich nichts mehr zu erkennen, was das angeht. Grüße |
| 180062025 (Comments: 2) | SLMapper (Discussed changesets: 23) | thank you! oh I see, you placed the pedestrian traffic signals on separate nodes and making them distinct nodes, resolves ambiguity. The wiki also mentions to tag crossing=no on the vehicle traffic lights (likely to not get repeated calculatio... commented 2026-03-18 20:05:51 UTC by SLMapper ♦43 |
 | 178736209 (Comments: 3) | K1RB1L1TY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sory if the message came of as rude or anything, it didnt mean to be this way, after all but this is just my personally opinoin commented 2026-03-18 20:03:50 UTC by K1RB1L1TY ♦1 |
| 180077138 (Comments: 1) | 500383974 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 20:03:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180076996 (Comments: 1) | 500385217 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 20:00:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179819309 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179819250 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 180077000 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 293) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 179811072, 179811762, 179811960, 179812020, 179812075, 179812133, 179812177, 179812231, 179812294, 179812363, 179812403, 179812448, 179812513, 179812572, 179812631, 179812679, 179812715, 179... commented 2026-03-18 19:55:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179819356 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179819420 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179819510 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818724 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818769 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818818 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818870 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818922 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818968 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179819047 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179819097 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179819147 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179819202 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818262 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818328 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818393 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818447 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818503 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818556 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818598 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818686 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818640 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818202 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818149 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:53 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817928 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817546 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817577 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817657 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817716 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817773 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817824 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817871 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817984 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818038 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179818086 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:52 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817053 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817104 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817165 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817231 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817280 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817341 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817399 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817446 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179817509 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816993 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816741 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816374 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816794 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816644 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816856 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816596 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816540 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816496 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816428 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816912 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816950 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816689 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816321 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816263 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816199 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816136 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816074 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179816029 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815975 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815932 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815870 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:49 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815364 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815816 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815771 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815723 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815676 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815626 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815564 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815509 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815473 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815416 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:48 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815064 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814864 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814908 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814947 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814983 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815022 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815112 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815162 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815207 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815250 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179815303 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:47 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814335 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814821 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814746 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814705 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814668 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814615 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814286 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814560 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814512 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814430 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814387 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:46 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814198 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814162 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814100 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179814048 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813987 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813941 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813880 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813829 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813787 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813748 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:45 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813578 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813241 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813295 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813355 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813408 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813467 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813687 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813624 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813546 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813078 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813190 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813141 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179813001 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812950 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812908 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812839 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812787 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812715 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812513 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:42 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812448 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:42 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812403 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:42 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812363 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:42 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812679 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:42 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812572 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:42 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812631 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:42 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179811960 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:41 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812133 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:41 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812177 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:41 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812231 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:41 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812294 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:41 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812075 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:41 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179812020 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:41 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179811762 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:40 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 179811072 (Comments: 1) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import commented 2026-03-18 19:55:40 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,014 |
| 180076910 (Comments: 1) | 15576678 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 19:54:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 29153722 (Comments: 1) | ClaudeMarani (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour. Vous citez Wikipedia comme source pour le nom "Nouveau Canal de Mardyck", mais cette page ne donne pas de source elle-même. L'autre nom sur cette page est "Dérivation de Mardyck". Cependant, les cartes I... commented 2026-03-18 19:54:13 UTC by Kurt PM Lapere ♦12 |
| 180076328 (Comments: 1) | 500384233 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 19:36:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179899212 (Comments: 1) | toyama_tokanawa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, could you check the tags you added? There's a spelling mistake "sufrace" instead of "surface". commented 2026-03-18 19:29:37 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 180025491 (Comments: 4) | camelino (Discussed changesets: 4) | De site verwijst idd door naar een andere meer recente site. Zal de meest recente toevoegen. commented 2026-03-18 19:28:49 UTC by camelino ♦3 |
| 179923325 (Comments: 1) | Осмаппер26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1268699 граница района поломана commented 2026-03-18 19:23:51 UTC by mini-me ♦268 |
| 177511766 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180075788 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 19:21:42 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179996267 (Comments: 1) | Brice Andrianarisoa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, could you have another look at these boundaries? I notice that the outer boundary is somehow similar to the one of Manamisoa, but it doesn't fit properly - shouldn't they be equal? Also, there are several "shape...&quo... commented 2026-03-18 19:16:23 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 177533486 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180074219 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 19:15:14 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180048668 (Comments: 1) | Максим Баранаускас (Discussed changesets: 2) | вы добавили на всю длину улицы теги, что якобы на ней разметка движения по полосам для поворота. очевидно, что это не так, такая разметка н... commented 2026-03-18 19:15:05 UTC by literan ♦7,027 |
| 180063775 (Comments: 1) | gially86 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao, occhio che hai intersecato gli edifici tra loro e collegato alla strada uno di questi --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180063775 commented 2026-03-18 19:13:31 UTC by Antonino_Faro ♦5 |
| 180000535 (Comments: 1) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 33) | Wow, der Festplatz sieht jetzt echt klasse aus! Danke für die viele Arbeit, die Du Dir damit gemacht hast. commented 2026-03-18 19:12:50 UTC by GeoMH ♦3 |
| 180074592 (Comments: 4) | sa62 (Discussed changesets: 9) | С cycleway=track се означава че е отделена с физическа преграда. Връщането на промени става най-лесно с https://revert.monicz.dev commented 2026-03-18 19:12:39 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦838 |
| 180073349 (Comments: 1) | Sörenlange (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, noch einmal etwas ausführlicher: - Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerweise leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE... commented 2026-03-18 19:10:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
| 180070077 (Comments: 1) | Sörenlange (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, hier wäre zu korrigieren. - couplings - power - colour: entweder „red“ – oder nichts, weil Unterflurhydranten keine Farbe haben Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-18 19:05:31 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
| 176268441 (Comments: 1) | Nellywood (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравствуйте, тегом highway=living_street обозначаются улицы, обозначенные знаками 5.21 и 5.22 "Жилая зона. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=living_street Е... commented 2026-03-18 19:04:58 UTC by Grass-snake ♦275 |
| 180069789 (Comments: 1) | Sörenlange (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, hier passt das power=DN 100 nicht. Viele Grüße commented 2026-03-18 19:02:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
| 180069574 (Comments: 1) | Sörenlange (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkung zu diesem Hydranten: Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerweise leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlü... commented 2026-03-18 19:01:59 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
| 179660496 (Comments: 4) | kaiyuen (Discussed changesets: 1) | This isn't updated yet. commented 2026-03-18 18:58:28 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 180006355 (Comments: 1) | document-cat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for plotting these. Do consider using the Cadastral data layer to ensure they are properly aligned with existing data in the map (you can move alignment layers to match). commented 2026-03-18 18:58:23 UTC by no details provided here ♦35 |
| 180067630 (Comments: 4) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3867) | and thanks for cleaning up that name:de ! I was unsure where to start with that one commented 2026-03-18 18:57:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180053449 (Comments: 1) | document-cat (Discussed changesets: 2) | These buildings seem to overlap? Presume this wasn't like this on site - can you check? Thank you. commented 2026-03-18 18:56:28 UTC by no details provided here ♦35 |
| 179324452 (Comments: 1) | Veganarchocommunist (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's best practice to use sentence case not block capitals for shop names unless this is how it is displayed on site. commented 2026-03-18 18:54:09 UTC by no details provided here ♦35 |
| 180030926 (Comments: 2) | _RIZZMASTEREK_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | stacja kolejowa "Warszawa Zamienie" nie istnieje i jest kompletną fikcją, zgadza się? commented 2026-03-18 18:53:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180074883 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 599) | wycofuje https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180030926 commented 2026-03-18 18:52:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180061355 (Comments: 4) | SensualMassage (Discussed changesets: 1) | hahaha sorry i thought u tried to confirm from google and failed. thanks commented 2026-03-18 18:50:49 UTC by SensualMassage ♦1 |
| 179749277 (Comments: 1) | OneTouch Appliance Repair (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is this marked on a sign at this building? Is it a place customers would go to to drop off appliances? commented 2026-03-18 18:48:06 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 179720681 (Comments: 9) | herbinator (Discussed changesets: 10) | Heel bijzonder want in mijn organic app was het wel aangepast maar het lijkt dan niet automatisch te worden geupload. Heb het nu vanuit de browser gedaan commented 2026-03-18 18:46:49 UTC by herbinator ♦9 |
| 177757583 (Comments: 1) | Getpin_Com (Discussed changesets: 15) | аптека не існує - Івано-Франківськ, вул. Шевченка 46 commented 2026-03-18 18:45:09 UTC by Chieftl ♦63 |
| 180073691 (Comments: 1) | jeshua medina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13659027969 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-18 18:41:29 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180070882 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 350) | thanks! commented 2026-03-18 18:40:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180074373 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 599) | fixes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180067630 commented 2026-03-18 18:39:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180071494 (Comments: 1) | Bubble FTW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please do not add names to things that do not have names. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions commented 2026-03-18 18:38:08 UTC by impiaaa ♦461 |
| 180072673 (Comments: 1) | Konfarter (Discussed changesets: 7) | Krasińskiego 16* commented 2026-03-18 18:33:44 UTC by Konfarter ♦6 |
| 180072747 (Comments: 1) | Konfarter (Discussed changesets: 7) | Krasińskiego 16* commented 2026-03-18 18:33:34 UTC by Konfarter ♦6 |
| 180074111 (Comments: 1) | Konfarter (Discussed changesets: 7) | Krasińskiego 16* commented 2026-03-18 18:33:24 UTC by Konfarter ♦6 |
| 179725885 (Comments: 3) | jb_seattle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487825283 really called 318th Street as well? If it has a designation at all, I'd expect it to be 103rd Avenue, since it's a north-south street. commented 2026-03-18 18:33:02 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 180073506 (Comments: 1) | boocha34 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-03-18 18:28:16 UTC by I-76 ♦62 |
| 179876349 (Comments: 1) | terriblememory (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good, thanks for all the edits! If you have any questions, https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ is a great resource, or you can leave a message here. Thanks again and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-03-18 18:15:22 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 143916639 (Comments: 2) | smarties (Discussed changesets: 94) | Jetzt ist der 1 km lange Abschnitt von der Schlosspassage bis zum Pumpwerk durchgängig als way/574433046 dargestellt und kommentiert. Ist das wirklich nur in einem Jahr hergestellt worden? Der Beschreibungstext ist optimierungsfähig,... commented 2026-03-18 18:12:47 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 180033400 (Comments: 2) | Adikso (Discussed changesets: 5) | I left it by accident. Removed it now. commented 2026-03-18 18:12:20 UTC by Adikso ♦35 |
| 180072868 (Comments: 1) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 18:00:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179971053 (Comments: 3) | LDiekmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply, and thanks for the understanding. The normal recommendation from the OSM community is exactly what It sounds like you are doing already. Make the ground reality match what you would like to see on the map. When the trail no logg... commented 2026-03-18 17:59:50 UTC by MassCartog ♦335 |
| 180071556 (Comments: 1) | birdrz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good, thanks for the contributions! If you have any questions about OpenStreetMap, please feel free to reach out to other local mappers here or at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ Welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-03-18 17:55:55 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 180009651 (Comments: 4) | sleep enjoyer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Obrigado por remover as calçadas duplicadas. Me avise se você pretende restaurar os 43 semáforos removidos, senão eu restauro. 36 deles identificavam onde havia também travessia de pedestre controlada por semá... commented 2026-03-18 17:53:44 UTC by ftrebien ♦183 |
| 177541611 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180072120 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 17:53:41 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
 | 180032578 (Comments: 5) | one_half_3544 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Если хребет означает высшую точку в пересечении с рекой, то значит река течет вверх. Поэтому, на мой взгляд, лучше разорвать хребет, выдел... commented 2026-03-18 17:52:22 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦39 |
| 180071288 (Comments: 2) | Martin aus BB (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok, werde ich in Zukunft beachten. Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe leider nichts gefunden wo den Kommentar nochmal ändern kann. commented 2026-03-18 17:45:14 UTC by Martin aus BB ♦1 |
| 177573485 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180071627 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 17:39:57 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179631232 (Comments: 2) | Tourist-Information Grainau (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179758153 commented 2026-03-18 17:33:13 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179649603 (Comments: 2) | Start Again Counseling (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180071779 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179648249 (Comments: 2) | The Cleaning Authority at Woodburn (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180071776 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 17:33:09 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179635239 (Comments: 2) | GeorgeLucas0815 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179636793 commented 2026-03-18 17:33:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
 | 179627994 (Comments: 2) | Seher Evi (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179628971 commented 2026-03-18 17:33:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179628971 (Comments: 2) | Seher Evi (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180071771 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-18 17:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179622322 (Comments: 2) | moleremovalsacramento (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180071769 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 17:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 177111279 (Comments: 1) | Hanspeter Schmidt (Discussed changesets: 13) | Why have you added the same name to both `name:de` and `old_name:de`? Shouldn't it be one or the other? + https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-03-18 17:30:16 UTC by dzamper ♦205 |
| 179968242 (Comments: 2) | pluton_od (Discussed changesets: 11) | fluffycupcakes, thanks for the comment! Yes, the changeset got duplicated due to poor mobile internet connection. I've reverted this changeset in 180071454. No more duplicates. commented 2026-03-18 17:29:03 UTC by pluton_od ♦57 |
| 179964769 (Comments: 1) | MATNC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:180071519 commented 2026-03-18 17:28:52 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180061755 (Comments: 1) | Sander H (Discussed changesets: 88) | Laat het importeren van die panden in de zuidwesthoek van de Energiecampus maar even voorlopig. Ik heb geen idee waarom die al in aanbouw zijn in de BAG, maar het grondwerk is nog niet eens begonnen. commented 2026-03-18 17:20:55 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦722 |
| 180071075 (Comments: 1) | Pawar1101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pawar1101, thanks for your contribution! When adding buildings, it's generally best to "square" them after drawing using the Q key (in the iD editor). This fixes any slightly off angles and creates a cleaner and more accurate... commented 2026-03-18 17:19:48 UTC by maxwellward ♦13 |
| 176727327 (Comments: 5) | Adam Lanza 2020 (Discussed changesets: 14) | You're Welcome commented 2026-03-18 17:18:49 UTC by Bubble FTW ♦3 |
| 171942151 (Comments: 3) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks commented 2026-03-18 17:18:33 UTC by Bubble FTW ♦3 |
| 179112887 (Comments: 13) | Дороги_54 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Попробуйте обратиться к разработчикам или в техподдержку Росдормониторинга (я не имею к ним никакого отношения). Все данные в OSM есть, с т... commented 2026-03-18 17:14:52 UTC by Grass-snake ♦275 |
| 177576484 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180070747 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 17:14:41 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 158439485 (Comments: 1) | CraigPe (Discussed changesets: 3) | I don't think things like "Tributary H-2.2" are names - they're internal identifiers (possibly refs), but definitely not commonly known or used by the average person to refer to these waterways, as the `name` tag would suggest. Fo... commented 2026-03-18 17:14:28 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦37 |
| 139184075 (Comments: 2) | Lytter1 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Rettet commented 2026-03-18 17:14:07 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,782 |
| 180021718 (Comments: 2) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 145) | Rozumiem zamysł, ale nadal natural=wood nie służy do oznaczania zieleńców o klimacie (vibe, atmosferze) lasu xd Jeśli chodzi o określenie wysokości, to chyba ele=* albo można dać krawężnik (barrier=kerb) ze strzałkami skiero... commented 2026-03-18 17:14:07 UTC by Anas masuris ♦170 |
| 179915851 (Comments: 2) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | Nice commented 2026-03-18 17:13:44 UTC by Bubble FTW ♦3 |
| 177584261 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180070225 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 17:07:22 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180070255 (Comments: 1) | nixon yesid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 17:03:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 57355942 (Comments: 13) | cepesko (Discussed changesets: 48) | Sehr gut, sieht auf jeden Fall so viel besser aus! Viel präziser muss es als "mountain range" gar nicht sein. Danke und Gruß Mikke commented 2026-03-18 17:01:41 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦95 |
| 173146710 (Comments: 1) | surreymapadict (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, just a note to say I've corrected a few housenames in your previous changesets - where a building has a name, you should use addr:housename= instead of name=. Secondly, where a bridge has a name, you should not change the name of the roa... commented 2026-03-18 17:01:16 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
| 180030695 (Comments: 2) | oceano582 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Por otro lado, por favor no agrupar casas en los dibujos. lo que es separado se dibuja por separado. No aglomeramos estructuras. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180030695... commented 2026-03-18 16:50:21 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 180031500 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jeldres (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por tu ediciones. Solo dos comentarios 1) por favor escribir con capitalización nomrmal. No solo con minúsculas y 2) por favor no usar contracciones. (Av. Psje.) no tiene sentido en un medio digital. usar el n... commented 2026-03-18 16:46:40 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 180008175 (Comments: 1) | LümmelMaster (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin LümmelMonster, wie ich sehe verwendest Du recycling:glass_bottles:colour. Danke! Es ist nicht wirklich gut dokumentiert, aber des alphabetische Sortieren der Farben macht es mir einfacher hier (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ke... commented 2026-03-18 16:45:54 UTC by lyctkel ♦360 |
| 180068399 (Comments: 1) | komu1102 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I reviewed your changeset, it looks fine --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180068399 commented 2026-03-18 16:41:11 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦20 |
| 180033885 (Comments: 1) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 107) | Estimado. No digo que este sea el caso, pero ojo con este tipo de correcciones. Hay varios cassos en Chile en que las calles simplemente están mal escritas y así fueron registradas. Revisar a veces la realidad en terreno. saludos ... commented 2026-03-18 16:34:18 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 171146996 (Comments: 2) | gmbo (Discussed changesets: 98) | Ist wirklich nur einspurig die Baustelle. Wird noch mindestens Sommer 2026 dauern. https://www.bochum.de/Pressemeldungen/21-August-2025/Bauarbeiten-der-Rigolen-auf-der-Alleestrasse-beginnen Ich hoffe, dass das dann wirklich fertig wird. Wir hab... commented 2026-03-18 16:34:06 UTC by gmbo ♦49 |
| 180066839 (Comments: 1) | syarifabdllh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12944669235 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-18 16:30:19 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180068186 (Comments: 1) | ANIKETLOKHANDE (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for your edits. I noticed you're adding lots of unneccessary nodes to your buildings that don't change anything withint the building's geometry. Could you please explain why are you adding those excessive nodes? commented 2026-03-18 16:29:33 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦20 |
| X | 179962761 (Comments: 2) | Josh_White (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180068218 commented 2026-03-18 16:20:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 180053573 (Comments: 6) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3867) | xdddddddxdxdxd, Du kannst nicht einfach einen DWG-Edit revertieren, nur weil Du irgendwas "für eine Regel hältst", siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20014 - wir tragen ein name:de ein, wenn der Name in aktivem Gebrau... commented 2026-03-18 16:18:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 180067935 (Comments: 1) | gontnhtumo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi gontnhtumo, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 highway(s) - 13 landuse(s) - 7 natural(s)<... commented 2026-03-18 16:17:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180030852 (Comments: 1) | Yhor (Discussed changesets: 8) | A private to private connection should still just be private, not no. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180030852 commented 2026-03-18 16:17:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,395 |
| 180030968 (Comments: 1) | Yhor (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wonder if there's a FOSS version of something like that. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180030968 commented 2026-03-18 16:15:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,395 |
| 177603566 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180067489 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 16:15:37 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180053475 (Comments: 3) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3867) | Ich habe die zwei Bushaltestellen jetzt wieder entfernt. Du hättest so lange Geduld haben sollen, anstatt meine komplette Bearbeitung rückgängig zu machen. Zu der Frage, ob Memel und Tilsit ein name:de verdienen oder doch nur ein old_n... commented 2026-03-18 16:14:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 177618475 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180066809 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 16:03:54 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180066832 (Comments: 1) | Uwe-G-Wohlgemut-2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20015 I very much doubt that bus lines near some random town are going to tell you much about German names in Kaliningrad. commented 2026-03-18 16:00:51 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 144631412 (Comments: 2) | LateNightTone (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hi, yes it's correct – you can see on GRAFCAN imagery that it is on top of the tunnel section of Avenida Nelson Mandela, and ends directly above where the latter enters the tunnel. If it's an issue with the proximity of the service ro... commented 2026-03-18 15:54:14 UTC by LateNightTone ♦69 |
| 180065808 (Comments: 1) | maja28z36837937980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for your edits. Please square the buildings that you're drawing when they are actually rectangular. You can square buildings with "Q" button in iD. I fixed geometry for 3 of your buildings in my changeset (https://www.... commented 2026-03-18 15:48:02 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦20 |
| 179924098 (Comments: 1) | AjonKellyGeo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180066066 commented 2026-03-18 15:38:45 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179874555 (Comments: 4) | ◪ Jarv (Discussed changesets: 46) | I cycled past this morning, there were no signs of any ducks. I've removed the tag. Best Regards, Matt commented 2026-03-18 15:37:27 UTC by matt_ellery ♦78 |
| 180065186 (Comments: 1) | JippeVRHM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag Jippe.. Ik heb motor_vehicle=no verwijderd. Dat hoort niet op een paaltje. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-18 15:37:16 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180063303 (Comments: 1) | hrittich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-18 15:33:32 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179914693 (Comments: 6) | Allroads (Discussed changesets: 45) | Wat voegt de tag dan toe bovenop wat op de wikipagina van footway=alley straat omschreven? Je loopt nu in je eentje een tag te pushen met een heel onhandige naam (want het omgekeerde van service=alley die een heel duidelijke betekenis heeft), ... commented 2026-03-18 15:31:37 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦722 |
| 180004198 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The unnecessary split has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180065664#map=17/42.520872/-70.922611. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 15:30:55 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180064026 (Comments: 1) | komu1102 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, thank you for your edits. I believe in this case the part of the building that you drew with a diagonal line was actually a straight vertical line just like in the rest of the building, correct me if I am wrong. The building footprint also sho... commented 2026-03-18 15:25:46 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦20 |
| 180063523 (Comments: 2) | agilenewt21 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sorry for the confusion. commented 2026-03-18 15:24:04 UTC by agilenewt21 ♦13 |
| 180033569 (Comments: 3) | FerroElSanty (Discussed changesets: 1) | no existe, reportado por spam. commented 2026-03-18 15:23:55 UTC by JanRivarola ♦1 |
| 180065089 (Comments: 2) | agilenewt21 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sorry for confusion! commented 2026-03-18 15:23:41 UTC by agilenewt21 ♦13 |
| 179978012 (Comments: 4) | IOTec EIRL (Discussed changesets: 3) | ok, gracias commented 2026-03-18 15:23:33 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179954206 (Comments: 1) | PulisakZ (Discussed changesets: 55) | Revert of 179950027 commented 2026-03-18 15:21:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180064767 (Comments: 1) | mabehere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 15:15:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179960762 (Comments: 1) | Nastia-m (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:180064874 commented 2026-03-18 15:15:30 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180022338 (Comments: 2) | ReyDerayos24 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hecho. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180064596#map=19/39.617201/-3.945008 Saludos commented 2026-03-18 15:08:51 UTC by ReyDerayos24 ♦9 |
| 179562276 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 66) | deletion should not be the option here even if it was gone. Abandoned can be used even if there are signs track was there. If you are only arm chair mapping via imagery. the key is that is on track MOW equipment on this spur and really should be tag... commented 2026-03-18 15:08:01 UTC by Natfoot ♦106 |
| 179938538 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Correa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180064448 commented 2026-03-18 15:07:39 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 180059282 (Comments: 1) | trollface7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11078831160, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7564900634 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move t... commented 2026-03-18 15:06:22 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180054287 (Comments: 2) | CT JACY DE ASSIS MANHÃ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3015088546 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-18 15:06:00 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180051089 (Comments: 1) | thejohhny (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11008636734 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-18 15:05:48 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 180043575 (Comments: 1) | Wubishet Girma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5769584380 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-18 15:05:34 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180040133 (Comments: 2) | Crisis Mundial (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3104285933 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-18 15:05:18 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180039017 (Comments: 1) | chickrocksusa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2846663732, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4971238093, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6450632092 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happen... commented 2026-03-18 15:05:18 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180063579 (Comments: 1) | 11daf (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please leave comments in English or Georgian so other local editors can understand your changes commented 2026-03-18 15:02:56 UTC by Jk488 ♦16 |
| 180061295 (Comments: 1) | six_serven (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vandalism. Reverted in changeset 180064207 commented 2026-03-18 15:02:51 UTC by JassKurn ♦170 |
| 180060823 (Comments: 1) | six_serven (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vandalism. Reverted in changeset180064161 commented 2026-03-18 15:02:04 UTC by JassKurn ♦170 |
| 180027756 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong and unnecessary tags on the Appleton street have since been removed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180064160. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 15:00:33 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179396182 (Comments: 4) | charlie-kirk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Try clearing your cache. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cache commented 2026-03-18 14:59:59 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 85519465 (Comments: 4) | bjoern_m (Discussed changesets: 30) | Nun auch in D: wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE_talk:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#railway=power_supply_widerspr%C3%BCchlich_definiert commented 2026-03-18 14:57:39 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 180046311 (Comments: 1) | navsolo (Discussed changesets: 1) | I will prefice this with this is a minor nit pick and you can feel free to ignore this but, when I first read this changeset comment (without knowing you are part of the amazon logistics team) I thought that this was a changeset where someone didnt l... commented 2026-03-18 14:51:27 UTC by Udarian ♦677 |
| 179503032 (Comments: 2) | Vanox (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bei Metzgerei Rimmele passen die Öffnungszeiten auch nicht zu denen auf der Webseite. commented 2026-03-18 14:44:28 UTC by LingM ♦3 |
| 180032343 (Comments: 1) | NittyGrittyInTheCity (Discussed changesets: 18) | I think the greenery has too much vertices, consider simplifying? commented 2026-03-18 14:43:09 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 176710037 (Comments: 3) | UnusualWorld (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks, I started cleaning up some data, moving the english genus from the species tag to the correct genus:en tag. I noticed a problem in some nodes: genus and genus:en reference to two different genuses. An example here: https://www.o... commented 2026-03-18 14:42:01 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,864 |
| 179939691 (Comments: 2) | Petró Tamás (Discussed changesets: 16) | Igen, konkrétan erről a kútról is már letakarítottam egyszer, amikor az összes többiről is Budapesten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168623930 commented 2026-03-18 14:41:45 UTC by infeeeee ♦649 |
| 179435237 (Comments: 2) | Martin Constantino–Bodin (Discussed changesets: 33) | Bien vu ! Je change ☺ J'ajoute les liens Wikidata, tant qu'à faire. commented 2026-03-18 14:38:19 UTC by Martin Constantino–Bodin ♦127 |
| 168559393 (Comments: 1) | osmusr4711 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi osmusr4711, I can't agree on the "Celtic Trails" branding and the one-way tag on this path (and the ones above). This is the feeder from P2 to Flowtrail. Please make a statement on your changes :) commented 2026-03-18 14:37:35 UTC by ne-lux ♦2 |
| 180031492 (Comments: 3) | dnchvw (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180062849 commented 2026-03-18 14:35:38 UTC by Fraxi ♦292 |
| 180061076 (Comments: 1) | YesYay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-18 14:30:26 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177620936 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180061548 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 14:29:10 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180053850 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 84) | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180052696 (junction is genuinely staggered). commented 2026-03-18 14:26:03 UTC by ika-chan! ♦341 |
| 179985079 (Comments: 1) | Eero T (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hei, kun lisäät rakennuksia, muista tehdä kulmista suorakulmaiset painamalla Q-kirjainta. commented 2026-03-18 14:24:21 UTC by themapper53 ♦7 |
| 180026754 (Comments: 2) | LySioS (Discussed changesets: 27) | It's a good question. I used to write "dels", but everytime I come across in the public dataset of french adresses, it's written D. Since it's a catalan word and not a french one, i don't know what to think. Here,... commented 2026-03-18 14:18:17 UTC by LySioS ♦143 |
| 180006759 (Comments: 3) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | @Grupo Safamotor, puedes contestar alguno de los changesets? Es importante que leas lo que te indican sobre publicidad en descripciones. commented 2026-03-18 14:16:43 UTC by aTarom ♦919 |
| 180046557 (Comments: 1) | Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (Discussed changesets: 17) | Setiap membuat relasi multipoligon, tiap garis punya perannya; garis luar (outer), garis dalam (inner), mohon diisi. commented 2026-03-18 14:09:53 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 180052049 (Comments: 2) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 186) | Proszę o dodanie właściwych tagów i niedodawanie opisów mających charakter reklamy commented 2026-03-18 14:08:08 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 180060054 (Comments: 2) | JackWoodgate (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've added access=private to these tracks and paths in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180061600 commented 2026-03-18 14:07:52 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| 177656123 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180060933 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 14:04:16 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180051090 (Comments: 2) | hansi_flex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke dir für den Hinweis! Sehr praktisch... commented 2026-03-18 13:55:27 UTC by hansi_flex ♦1 |
| 177112284 (Comments: 1) | murmeldin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Schon mal gut, dass hier keine Punkte verschoben wurden. Der Ansatz dürfte kaum greifen, siehe note/5119751 commented 2026-03-18 13:54:16 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 179964320 (Comments: 1) | QDARK0218 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180060735 commented 2026-03-18 13:49:46 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179996698 (Comments: 1) | vatlark (Discussed changesets: 3) | dawg this changeset should not span multiple countries. commented 2026-03-18 13:49:40 UTC by dmjab13 ♦87 |
| 180060262 (Comments: 1) | Alphonce Okoth (Discussed changesets: 1) | I fixed your building's geometry, as those seem to be rectangular buildings, however you haven't squared them. You can square buildings with "Q" button in iD, when the building is selected. --- ... commented 2026-03-18 13:47:44 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦20 |
| 180012342 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 136) | The gore sections shouldn't be parallel. They reflect how they are angled. It's not realistic to make it parallel, then suddently angled at the tip. commented 2026-03-18 13:42:07 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,806 |
| 173177118 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 29) | Bonjour, est-ce que vous avez pu vérifier la présence de la borne de recharge sur le terrain ? Elle n'est pas visible sur Google Street View en juillet 2025 et n'apparaît pas sur le site de l'opérateur. commented 2026-03-18 13:28:13 UTC by NathanBnm ♦36 |
| 179950236 (Comments: 2) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 4) | I had mentioned it in the forum. Interestingly, the improvement is there even w/o commented 2026-03-18 13:24:56 UTC by 9_tab ♦24 |
| 167436116 (Comments: 1) | Kimono My House (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the whole woodland now called 'Tawd Vale Scout Camp' or can its usage be differentiated from the local woodland names Ten Acre Wood/Delf Wood/Box Plantation etc? commented 2026-03-18 13:18:32 UTC by no details provided here ♦35 |
| 174764928 (Comments: 1) | djsa (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, I've checked today if I could find https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451319596, but couldn't find it. To the best of my knowledge, this might have been the old path (> 10 years ago) through Egenhovenbos before the Dijle was reroute... commented 2026-03-18 13:15:04 UTC by toeklk ♦48 |
| 179771213 (Comments: 1) | Pitoti65 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buon pomeriggio Pitoti65, il percorso escursionistico da te inserito (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20312284) ha ref 400, ma nel settore è già presente un percorso con tale ref. le opzioni sono: - unirlo con l&... commented 2026-03-18 13:09:50 UTC by Andrea Del Sarto ♦82 |
| 179919776 (Comments: 2) | branco-josm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Discussion continued here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adding-the-type-of-tree-species-genus/96432/5 commented 2026-03-18 13:09:46 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,864 |
| 178403122 (Comments: 2) | Tomscience (Discussed changesets: 1) | RÚIAN id nesouvisí s velvyslanectvím https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180058978 commented 2026-03-18 13:07:25 UTC by Piskvor ♦454 |
| 165754866 (Comments: 1) | Seat Ibiza (Discussed changesets: 70) | When editing in Lower Saxony please feel free to use the official Niedersachsen DOP20 imagery. This may help to reduces issues like note/5119751 because of mismatching angles of the roads at the junction node/26153497. For sure Bing ha... commented 2026-03-18 13:05:53 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
 | 174428214 (Comments: 1) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 19) | https://revert.osmz.ru/12281 commented 2026-03-18 13:04:44 UTC by Layft Greater ♦187 |
| 180034642 (Comments: 1) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 14) | In this changeset, you have replaced barrier=kerb ways mapped by @cebderby with highway=footway + footway=sidewalk ways. The sidewalks should be added behind the kerb line (further from the centre line of the street and closer to the buildings... commented 2026-03-18 12:57:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| 177676535 (Comments: 2) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | zusätzlich: changeset/180058214 commented 2026-03-18 12:56:27 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180045884 (Comments: 1) | mathysGil2774 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Le stade s'appelle Easi Arena (et non pas easy arena) et il était déjà sur la carte : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256567898 L'orthographe du nom est confirmée par Wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia... commented 2026-03-18 12:52:34 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 165050386 (Comments: 1) | manchasgolem (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dicha ruta ya no opera commented 2026-03-18 12:48:20 UTC by M4teoAC ♦1 |
| 179950117 (Comments: 1) | Cristhianz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Un elemento no pude tener nombre "casa". Se refiere al nombre propio del elemento o negocio. commented 2026-03-18 12:46:01 UTC by rodolfovargas ♦69 |
| 179938677 (Comments: 3) | osm_fede (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ciao. Duplicare un civico su due ingressi diversi dovrebbe essere un errore in Italia, questo si. Ma ogni attività commerciale ha un indirizzo, riportato pure sugli eventuali scontrini/fatture, ed è una informazione utile per un data... commented 2026-03-18 12:42:40 UTC by Goffredo ♦68 |
| 180053819 (Comments: 2) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | ¿Podría explicar por qué usa esos nombres? No aparecen en la cartelería de los establecimientos que está añadiendo? Gracias. commented 2026-03-18 12:40:27 UTC by dcapillae ♦397 |
| 180055472 (Comments: 2) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hola. Use «brand:wikidata» para la marca. No use «wikidata». Las descripciones promocionales no tienen cabida en OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising. Los más probable es... commented 2026-03-18 12:38:17 UTC by dcapillae ♦397 |
| 173859848 (Comments: 1) | jhaluska80 (Discussed changesets: 28) | corrected school phone number in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180057612 commented 2026-03-18 12:34:36 UTC by wireguy ♦559 |
| 179889093 (Comments: 6) | PouLS_PL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nie wnikam, czy lokalni tramwajarze łamią prawo jadąc 70 km/h, czy nie, ja tylko podaję prawne ograniczenie. Oczywiście mogą obowiązywać dodatkowe ograniczenia narzucone przez GAiT, ale jest to droga publiczna więc ustawowe ograniczenie do 5... commented 2026-03-18 12:30:59 UTC by PouLS_PL ♦1 |
| X | 161859227 (Comments: 7) | Linie29 (Discussed changesets: 82) | Die Relationen sind auch wegen dem geänderten Verlauf in Hartberg nicht mehr aktuell. Am "einfachsten" wäre es komplett neue Relationen zu erstellen (theoretisch könnte man auch die zwei pro Richtung zusammenlegen aber so vie... commented 2026-03-18 12:27:31 UTC by Linie29 ♦46 |
| 180052696 (Comments: 2) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi ika-chan!, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you commented 2026-03-18 12:26:49 UTC by Kaduna ♦30 |
| 180055167 (Comments: 1) | Marcel Hermens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Inleggen van routerelaties gaat nog wel met iD, maar zodra je het wl aanpassen blijkt iD minder geschikt. Wanneer je ... commented 2026-03-18 12:24:36 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180045677 (Comments: 1) | yasmine_elhaddioui (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM. Dans votre modification vous avez aussi créé un étrange point : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13657879087 craft=agricultural_engines Définition = Le lieu de trava... commented 2026-03-18 12:15:27 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 180016310 (Comments: 9) | ronery-mapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | As long as it doesn't remove the name I'm fine with it. commented 2026-03-18 12:14:30 UTC by ronery-mapper ♦7 |
| 180025012 (Comments: 1) | Toddders (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you've made two changes here that are quite far away from each other in the same changeset. As a result the bounding box for your changeset is very large. It's generally best practice to use one changeset for each area you'r... commented 2026-03-18 11:54:44 UTC by strawberryjam4 ♦1 |
| 180002936 (Comments: 9) | Thatoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Rien tout simplement : un panneau d'affichage libre n'a pas de nom propre. Oui, iD ou JOSM permettent de contribuer plus facilement (sur PC). Ou SCEE et Vespucci sur téléphone (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SCEE, http... commented 2026-03-18 11:54:21 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 177685793 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180054521 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 11:54:17 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179971851 (Comments: 3) | klauz84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm not sure what the right tag would be for this, so it might be worth asking on https://community.openstreetmap.org/ for suggestions. commented 2026-03-18 11:40:24 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| 180049394 (Comments: 1) | AnjaliChoudhari (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I recommend squaring them after you drew them. (Unless the building is not a square of course.) In iD you can use the mouse menu, there's an option, or press the shortcut 'Q'. :) commented 2026-03-18 11:39:42 UTC by Seyruun ♦14 |
| 139924994 (Comments: 1) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 123) | Hi flierfy, du hast den way https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1198413978 eingetragen, aber der ist weder Teil einer Relation noch hat er Tags. Kannst du mal schauen, ob der weg kann? Anscheinend hat er keine Relevanz mehr. Grü... commented 2026-03-18 11:35:45 UTC by AlexSpritze ♦33 |
| 178469561 (Comments: 4) | Hendrik Helsper (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zu 3 Dann bin ich einverstanden, dass es kein 'highway=busway' ist. Ich würde es dann aber als 'highway=pedestrian' taggen, denn das ist es ja nachwievor (analog zur Ludwigstraße, wo es ja auch eine de-facto Fahrbahn... commented 2026-03-18 11:29:45 UTC by Hendrik Helsper ♦16 |
| 180046809 (Comments: 1) | Antoniopuerto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Antonio. Bienvenido a OSM Chile y gracias por tus ediciones. SIn embargo te veo agregando y desagregando tags a los caminos del interior del puerto. Ahora les sacaste el tag de limitación de acceso y los dejaste de libre de circulac... commented 2026-03-18 11:29:29 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 180044217 (Comments: 4) | Makkinga (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yep... met behoud van de oude adresnode. Er zijn wel trucjes om de bedrijfsinfo te kopiëren. Die leer je vanzelf wel. CTRL-F5 voor het effect. De cache laat de praktijk nog zien. Gr eggie commented 2026-03-18 11:26:58 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180043749 (Comments: 3) | Makkinga (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je toevoeging was correct. oneway:bicycle=no ontbrak nog. Het routeert nu voor alle tweewielers. Wanneer het openstaat voor bestemmingsverkeer dan is de juiste tag motor_vehicle=destination. Dan zal het ook niet routeren voor regulier ... commented 2026-03-18 11:25:07 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179937177 (Comments: 1) | Hanspeter Schmidt (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo Hanspeter Schmidt, bitte lies doch einmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments und versuche, künftig etwas bessere Changeset-Kommentare als nur "update" zu verwenden. Danke! commented 2026-03-18 11:19:29 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 180053270 (Comments: 1) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 11:09:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180053076 (Comments: 2) | deadmix (Discussed changesets: 2) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Plumber was remapped as a node instead of pretending this huge building is solely for the plumber. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13658518300 commented 2026-03-18 11:07:33 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 179320278 (Comments: 2) | PowerMapper77 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the information. Always learning. We will be conducting a review of all of our uploads in a few days. commented 2026-03-18 11:07:29 UTC by PowerMapper77 ♦1 |
| 176723381 (Comments: 2) | jamierocks (Discussed changesets: 1) | never mind, just found this :) https://www.linkedin.com/posts/shrewsbury-high-school-gdst_girlsschool-shrewsbury-shropshire-activity-7196925751252656128-ALGG/ commented 2026-03-18 11:05:32 UTC by ohmanger ♦43 |
| 180050020 (Comments: 3) | Kancelaria podatkowa ibiuro24 (Discussed changesets: 3) | zapoznałem sie z tym artykułem i wszystko jest tak jak tam napisane ale wykorzystamy to narzedzie ktore jest tam wymioenione commented 2026-03-18 11:00:45 UTC by Kancelaria podatkowa ibiuro24 ♦3 |
| 180028331 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 75) | Fixed 40T/56' restriction to 18T/30' based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180052799 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 10:55:41 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦69 |
| 128236714 (Comments: 1) | GarryX3D (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi GarryX3D, in diesem Änderungssatz gibt es den way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108122256 der weder Tags hat noch zu einer Relation gehört, also ziemlich blank ist, aber anscheinend doch eine Funktion haben könnte. |
| 180029041 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 75) | Fixing 40T/56' restriction to 18T/30' based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180052541 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 10:51:45 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦69 |
| 180048854 (Comments: 2) | Kancelaria podatkowa ibiuro24 (Discussed changesets: 3) | wszystko zostało dodane zgodnie z instrukcją. integralna częścią nazwy biura jest ibiuro24 commented 2026-03-18 10:50:50 UTC by Kancelaria podatkowa ibiuro24 ♦3 |
| 180049070 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoinplett (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-03-18 10:43:48 UTC by Comino ♦323 |
| 179202120 (Comments: 1) | hadhuey (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo, "winter_service:cycling:net" ist ein merkwürdiges Tag an einer Straße. Der Begriff "cycling" wird in OSM nur an Sportanlagen verwendet. Für normale Wege müsste es entweder "cycleway" oder &... commented 2026-03-18 10:39:18 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 180034416 (Comments: 1) | Bendinko (Discussed changesets: 15) | review_requested \tyes Lijkt me oke MVG eggie commented 2026-03-18 10:36:45 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180051809 (Comments: 1) | Lamls (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-18 10:36:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180045182 (Comments: 1) | Jebox (Discussed changesets: 10) | review_requested \tyes Dag Jebox, Wanneer er geen G7 staat zou het heel goed kunnen. Heb nog wel foot=yes toegevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-18 10:36:03 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177901232 (Comments: 1) | njmccarthy11 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. You tagged most (approx. 160) paths in part as highway=unclassified. Check this wiki where you can use this tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa A major requirement is the... commented 2026-03-18 10:34:40 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 180050266 (Comments: 2) | Hoefje Nietteweten (Discussed changesets: 1) | typo oneway:bicycle=no toegevoegd en ook voor mofa en moped. Verkeersbord G12a verwijderd of staat dat er nog wel? MVG eggie commented 2026-03-18 10:32:34 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
 | 179976013 (Comments: 1) | Kumara18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 179975888 commented 2026-03-18 10:22:14 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 142303477 (Comments: 10) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 67) | Kempy vypadají typicky například takto : https://ibb.co/p65K6WPY Je to malý skalný převis pod který neprší, součást je nějaký nábytek ze dřeva a jiné zařízen... commented 2026-03-18 10:21:30 UTC by Tomas_J ♦340 |
| 179937505 (Comments: 3) | sabas88 (Discussed changesets: 77) | Capito, grazie del chiarimento 🙂 commented 2026-03-18 10:06:40 UTC by EneaSuper ♦480 |
| 180000001 (Comments: 2) | NTTrailsLSE (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi NTTrailsLSE, Firstly, what a shame you missed the 180000000 changeset ;) I was curious as to who was late for the round number and came here. I noticed you are using what3words in your edits. Are you aware of this: https://wi... commented 2026-03-18 10:05:15 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 177714861 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180049404 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 09:57:44 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179989667 (Comments: 3) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 63) | Thx. commented 2026-03-18 09:56:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦616 |
| 180049611 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 426) | And then tagged correctly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180049674 commented 2026-03-18 09:52:03 UTC by habi ♦2,059 |
| 179939175 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Correa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180049515 commented 2026-03-18 09:51:10 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 180044096 (Comments: 1) | RemiHou (Discussed changesets: 7) | Salut, le nom c'est "U Express", branch=U Express Lorient brand=U Express brand:wikidata=Q2529029 name=U Express - shop=supermarket shop=convenience commented 2026-03-18 09:50:11 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 165806217 (Comments: 1) | Bernhard_r (Discussed changesets: 5) | HI Bernhard_r, so do you confirm this is not a "sorbus aucuparia" but a Betula (birke)? I ask because you changed the genus, name and species tags but you left the old genus:de/species:de tags, pointing to another genus. thank... commented 2026-03-18 09:40:16 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,864 |
| 100 (Comments: 8) | sxpert (Discussed changesets: 2) | Me to, but only because we marked the 180000000 changeset 2026-03-18 commented 2026-03-18 09:33:21 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 179918247 (Comments: 1) | RenePiccolotto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Rene Wenn das Gebäude noch auf den (swisstopo) Luftfotos zu sehen ist, ist es besser, dieses mit einem sog. Lebenszyklus-Präfix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Präfix) zu markieren. Das verhindert, dass ... commented 2026-03-18 09:32:39 UTC by habi ♦2,059 |
| 1 (Comments: 58) | Steve (Discussed changesets: 5) | Just came to check if this one is still here ;) Especially now when we went past 180,000,000 changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180000000 commented 2026-03-18 09:31:18 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 180041770 (Comments: 2) | DomFlc (Discussed changesets: 1) | In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180048025 zusammengeführt. Da ich nicht erkennen konnte, welcher `operator` und welche `description` richtig ist, habe ich die Werte grad alle entfernt. commented 2026-03-18 09:26:41 UTC by habi ♦2,059 |
| 180043731 (Comments: 2) | Makkinga (Discussed changesets: 4) | Als bovenstaand aangepast. We scherp om oneway:bicycle=no toe te voegen. Dat had een voorgaande mapper verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-18 09:24:23 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180000383 (Comments: 3) | Inplace Studio (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id: 180047698 commented 2026-03-18 09:21:56 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 179360495 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 318) | Hi, Double-mapped building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483108713/ commented 2026-03-18 09:16:44 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 179976906 (Comments: 3) | KD Pest Control (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id: 180047308 commented 2026-03-18 09:16:33 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 180043842 (Comments: 1) | Timgrtv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-18 09:10:13 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180043767 (Comments: 1) | Makkinga (Discussed changesets: 4) | idem... Toegang mofa en moped? commented 2026-03-18 09:09:25 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180045926 (Comments: 1) | Streetflyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is a private path through a garden. My original comment was incorrect. I have therefore removed the “pass through” permission. commented 2026-03-18 08:47:57 UTC by Streetflyer ♦1 |
| 180031856 (Comments: 1) | dnchvw (Discussed changesets: 1) | По същия начин като с другото училище. Има вече отбелязан адрес https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244948034 Не е нужно да се добавя адрес върху самите сград... commented 2026-03-18 08:24:29 UTC by Fraxi ♦292 |
| 175012676 (Comments: 1) | Troy Hartwig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Note the wiki description of tourism=camp_pitch : "The pitch must be located within an area tagged tourism=camp_site ". In other words, all these standalone “camp_pitch” should probably be created as “camp_site” inst... commented 2026-03-18 08:19:15 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦121 |
| 162726562 (Comments: 3) | il Vaz (Discussed changesets: 7) | 👍 commented 2026-03-18 08:14:43 UTC by michi68 ♦1 |
| 177728297 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180044458 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 08:08:07 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
 | 179354092 (Comments: 1) | omar_KABOS (Discussed changesets: 0) | Hi, is it some test? This is common map, not local playground, please revert these changes. commented 2026-03-18 07:57:27 UTC by Sanniu ♦639 |
| 179856640 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 73) | Wrong hgv restriction that was made in this changeset was fixed in 180043735. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 07:51:49 UTC by JakovBušić ♦69 |
| 179825188 (Comments: 2) | Jožo Schwarz (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ahoj, na miestach, kde je trasa značená ako highway=cycleway je trasa síce na jednej asfaltovej ploche, ale fyzicky oddelená parkovacím pásom. Medzi parkovacím pásom a pásom pre cyklistov je e&... commented 2026-03-18 07:50:06 UTC by Jožo Schwarz ♦14 |
| 176737266 (Comments: 4) | demanuel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Indeed it's not signed very well (and it's not *done* well, either - there's zero foot traffic, but no, we need to have two options, each half-baked) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Strakonick%C3%A1_ulice,_pohled_od_%C4%8Derpac... commented 2026-03-18 07:49:06 UTC by Piskvor ♦454 |
| 179989423 (Comments: 1) | hhss88 (Discussed changesets: 0) | Bonjour, Vos 2 premiers ajouts ont déjà été corrigés par un contributeur, Jakka. Je ne sais pas s'il vous a contacté. L'ajout de fausses informations est considéré comm... commented 2026-03-18 07:43:03 UTC by juminet ♦104 |
| 179988679 (Comments: 1) | Luludrx (Discussed changesets: 0) | Bonjour, Est-ce que cette attraction existe vraiment ;-) ? Sinon, pouvez-vous la retirer, svp? Merci et bonne continuation sur OSM! Happy mapping, juminet commented 2026-03-18 07:38:05 UTC by juminet ♦104 |
| 179976327 (Comments: 1) | Hassan_Reza_0 (Discussed changesets: 0) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180043765 commented 2026-03-18 07:36:34 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 130984388 (Comments: 2) | Leif Lodahl (Discussed changesets: 70) | Rettet i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180042505 commented 2026-03-18 07:00:13 UTC by b-holdet ♦350 |
 | 180036512 (Comments: 1) | Agnes Jackson Cesardouglas Hoang (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Agnes Jackson Cesardouglas Hoang, with this way :1489841497 you created a duplicate geometry for the coast. Also there are many errors inside the polygon. Can I ask you to delete one of the duplicate geometries for the coast and fix the geometr... commented 2026-03-18 06:57:04 UTC by borovac ♦117 |
| 158553150 (Comments: 2) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Die Straße ist zwar für den allgemeinen motorisierten Verkehr gesperrt, ist aber immer noch Straße mit Verbindungscharakter für andere Fahrzeuge wie Fahrräder und Busse (gerade, da hier bis zu fünf Buslinien fahren und... commented 2026-03-18 06:49:28 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦257 |
| 179923343 (Comments: 1) | beatriz gambali (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180041837 commented 2026-03-18 06:46:18 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 180030887 (Comments: 1) | Koffieboer (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dag Koffieboer, access=private zal alles dekken. Daar hoeft geen foot=private bij. Die regel zou wegkunnen. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-18 06:40:35 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 173517778 (Comments: 1) | Юлия95 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Пожалуйста не добавляйте дороги параллельно уже существующим, т.е. не дублируйте дороги когда они уже есть на карте. Во-вторых, в качеств... commented 2026-03-18 06:39:32 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,283 |
| 179963221 (Comments: 3) | Léna-Monpays (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @bxl-forever https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179976284 commented 2026-03-18 06:36:52 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 180029415 (Comments: 2) | Prins6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Toegangsweg teruggezet met highwaytag en name=Eigen Terein / Private Property verwijderd. Het is niet getagd als openbare weg. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-18 06:32:03 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179916305 (Comments: 1) | TamLin (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Can I point out that you've made many duplicate nodes at the ends of linear features. I've removed several in the last few days. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-03-18 06:24:49 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,119 |
| 180030720 (Comments: 1) | Joe Gullo Digital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-18 06:24:29 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| X | 179795852 (Comments: 2) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 9) | admin_level=2 itu digunakan untuk batas administrasi negara. Harap pahami pedoman tag di https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Admin_level. Saya harus revert perubahan ini. commented 2026-03-18 06:20:00 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 180019600 (Comments: 1) | Urquidi79Arq (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, muchas gracias por mejorar todos los lugares que editaste en Cochabamba! No hay mucha información publicada de las empresas municipales y peor sus páginas web... commented 2026-03-18 06:09:18 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,654 |
| 180007101 (Comments: 2) | cosphi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Danke für deine Nachricht. Ich wohne in der Nähe diese Wohngebietes und könnte auch beim durchlaufen einen GPS-Tack aufnehmen - aber ich glaube dass das nicht besser wird als die DOP20 Karte. commented 2026-03-18 05:55:58 UTC by cosphi ♦7 |
| 179977785 (Comments: 1) | Geo_Jon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:180039656 commented 2026-03-18 05:52:44 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180009303 (Comments: 1) | Miguelon_pimpon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset 180039263 commented 2026-03-18 05:42:23 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180036156 (Comments: 1) | HenryEK (Discussed changesets: 3) | 1. Please don't use descriptive names. Use `route_ref=` https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13657534656 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13657534642 2. Please don't attach bus stops to the road. That's `public_transport=stop_positi... commented 2026-03-18 05:36:37 UTC by kingkingHK ♦268 |
| 180029782 (Comments: 2) | 500361082 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-18 05:33:20 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179613516 (Comments: 2) | hkmmilwaukee (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179632882 commented 2026-03-18 05:33:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179604079 (Comments: 2) | 500383427 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039151 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179603112 (Comments: 2) | Baum's Boots & More (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039150 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179602386 (Comments: 2) | 500379029 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039147 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179602698 (Comments: 2) | 500383121 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039148 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179602340 (Comments: 2) | High Value Signs (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039146 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179601105 (Comments: 2) | Country Lawn & Garden (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039141 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179600646 (Comments: 2) | 15789254 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039140 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
 | 144220668 (Comments: 2) | sikmir (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, that's old carved slab. commented 2026-03-18 05:19:47 UTC by sikmir ♦11 |
| 179969431 (Comments: 1) | Юрий Батуринец (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180038700 commented 2026-03-18 05:19:12 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 179945058 (Comments: 3) | Shel_Sri (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi iandees, By visual appearance I reclassified as residential, but I didn’t realize it was inside a parking polygon at that time. I have made the corrections, thank you for pointing this out. commented 2026-03-18 05:13:04 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦8 |
| 180038281 (Comments: 1) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 29) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083454 commented 2026-03-18 05:09:20 UTC by pesticides ♦37 |
 | 180037770 (Comments: 1) | MrBogh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13608743341 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-18 05:08:33 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180038222 (Comments: 1) | Rogan Art (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 05:06:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180028821 (Comments: 1) | OSMJon22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Jon, thanks for requesting a review and leaving a detailed, helpful changeset comment! it looks like this changeset entirely deleted the driveway and its nodes, instead of splitting the way and tagging it appropriately, as you've prope... commented 2026-03-18 05:00:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦111 |
| 178969801 (Comments: 2) | PedestrianMapping_MapObscura (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the feedback! I’ll make sure to add those where appropriate commented 2026-03-18 04:55:36 UTC by PedestrianMapping_MapObscura ♦3 |
| 84099730 (Comments: 1) | pasukanoren (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kenapa menggunakan tag school:type_idn=*? commented 2026-03-18 04:52:06 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 180005824 (Comments: 1) | Urquidi79Arq (Discussed changesets: 3) | gracias por aclarar, la ultima vez que pasé por ahi solo vi el nombre zamudio. qué lio tener 2 o como encontré hasta 5 "escuelas" en una misma infraestructura. no encuentro la lógica porque separar, sino ... commented 2026-03-18 04:42:27 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,654 |
| 179768883 (Comments: 1) | Lc4590 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lc4590, Is this defibrillator inside the Fourth & Vine Building? And are there 2 separate units, one on floor 1 and one on floor 5? Thanks, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-03-18 04:34:48 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 179907929 (Comments: 1) | Torey360 (Discussed changesets: 51) | hmmm... a ene/2026 en las imágenes mapbox no hay ningún trabajo en esta sección. se ve la ultima estación concluida y lso arbustos sobre la via antigua... qué fuente usaste? visita en el lugar? commented 2026-03-18 04:17:32 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,654 |
| 178715986 (Comments: 1) | mike140 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Доброго Дня ти замінив natural=grassland на farmland це неправильно Раніше ця територія була розплідником дерев Держлісгоспу- зараз ця терито... commented 2026-03-18 04:17:06 UTC by anti-caveman ♦34 |
| 178387099 (Comments: 1) | alyapuspita (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wow. Untuk pelinggih, bisa gunakan historic=wayside_shrine commented 2026-03-18 03:56:46 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 179941557 (Comments: 3) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hi InsertUser, thank you for notifying me about this. It was an accident and I have made the corrections now. commented 2026-03-18 03:53:01 UTC by Byenin ♦42 |
| 180035564 (Comments: 1) | Luz Elena 23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7988374904, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8931201875 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move th... commented 2026-03-18 03:43:48 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179931839 (Comments: 3) | Jebel_Hafeet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi DaveF, thank you for your feedback. I restored the alignment of the road and aligned the building footprints. I will take great care on alignment issues on my future edits. commented 2026-03-18 03:39:21 UTC by Jebel_Hafeet ♦2 |
| 179984394 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Nein - weiterhin unnötiges Multipolygon commented 2026-03-18 03:08:38 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 179981993 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 14) | Acknowledged. Going forward will take care of those tags now only we got this update. Thank you. Regards Prasanna Devi Madasamy commented 2026-03-18 02:54:12 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦18 |
| 179988127 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 14) | Acknowledged. Going forward will take care of those tags now only we got this update. Thank you. Regards Prasanna Devi Madasamy commented 2026-03-18 02:43:40 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦18 |
| 179930562 (Comments: 1) | rmx90210 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please try to keep edits within a reasonable geographic area. It can make it difficult to decipher changelogs of local areas. commented 2026-03-18 02:06:38 UTC by Rambling Banjo ♦3 |
| 178678261 (Comments: 6) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 80) | > This has to be resolved. it may require data consumer starting to support also genus tags (maybe also taxon?) commented 2026-03-18 01:23:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179446629 (Comments: 1) | trailrunner13 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, I noticed you've tagged a few locations with the same tags on the lot and the building. Please don't do this, it's against OSM guidelines. osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Also I don't think this counts as... commented 2026-03-18 00:50:55 UTC by tguen ♦107 |
| 180030061 (Comments: 1) | Moregon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Is this name written on a sign? What type of feature is it (shop, etc.)? commented 2026-03-18 00:38:25 UTC by pwbriggs ♦196 |
| 179982911 (Comments: 2) | saraswathi89 (Discussed changesets: 1112) | Acknowledged. Going forward will take care of those tags now only we got this update going forward will take care. Thank you Regards, Saraswathi M P commented 2026-03-18 00:19:43 UTC by saraswathi89 ♦2 |
| 179839102 (Comments: 1) | TorCguy (Discussed changesets: 30) | As I have asked several times before, please stop using 'ref' tag for the state road tagging in North Carolina. The proper tag is 'unsigned_ref' commented 2026-03-18 00:08:05 UTC by rivermont ♦239 |
| 179883833 (Comments: 1) | TorCguy (Discussed changesets: 30) | What is NCCH Orthos? You are adding it as a source on tons of features commented 2026-03-18 00:07:03 UTC by rivermont ♦239 |
| 177739356 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180032257 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-18 00:02:55 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179733788 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Baloo Uriza, My name is Surander, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. I have corrected the way in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179926704#map=18/36.031... commented 2026-03-17 23:58:08 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦13 |
| 180032445 (Comments: 1) | arpadgabor (Discussed changesets: 1) | wrong source, this is the source: https://gis.primariaarad.ro:7743/PMA/Maps/Manager/Index/2 commented 2026-03-17 23:53:15 UTC by arpadgabor ♦1 |
| 180001400 (Comments: 1) | kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changing the name is not the correct way to handle stages of decay please look in to life cycle prefixes on the OSM wiki --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1800... commented 2026-03-17 23:45:22 UTC by ralley ♦639 |
| 164390739 (Comments: 3) | unqsh (Discussed changesets: 3) | OK, thanks. commented 2026-03-17 23:30:59 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,819 |
| 179968663 (Comments: 1) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 48) | dziękuje, miło, że nie musiałem robic tego sam, ale wejdz w temat relacji inner i outer proszę. narysowałeś tez area od nowa, a nie faktycznie przywróciłeś. Przywraca się revertem pełym/częściowym lub undelete Licz... commented 2026-03-17 23:26:47 UTC by Yog Sot ♦441 |
 | 180030905 (Comments: 2) | HyperionIX (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fixed commented 2026-03-17 23:23:33 UTC by HyperionIX ♦1 |
| 180016423 (Comments: 2) | letsridebikes (Discussed changesets: 44) | see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bt-telephone-kiosk-data-inadvertently-wiped-by-streetcomplete/142413 commented 2026-03-17 22:42:00 UTC by letsridebikes ♦73 |
| 179995010 (Comments: 1) | letsridebikes (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reported bug https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6776 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bt-telephone-kiosk-data-inadvertently-wiped-by-streetcomplete/142413 commented 2026-03-17 22:41:13 UTC by letsridebikes ♦73 |
| 180030888 (Comments: 1) | dkronz6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/176011467 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of ... commented 2026-03-17 22:38:41 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 177902618 (Comments: 1) | Vivek Gupta Milpitas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maybe should be scrubbed entirely given the stated source of Google Maps, per OSM policy? commented 2026-03-17 22:35:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦111 |
| 177923593 (Comments: 2) | Vivek Gupta Fremont (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maybe it should be deleted entirely, though, given the stated source of Google Maps in violation of OSM policy... commented 2026-03-17 22:33:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦111 |
| 180027187 (Comments: 1) | sa62 (Discussed changesets: 9) | 2 неща по тази промяна, свързани с паркингите. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489951156 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489951153/. В първия случай е добре да се свърже у... commented 2026-03-17 22:13:28 UTC by Fraxi ♦292 |
| 177780525 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180029650 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-17 22:10:59 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179875571 (Comments: 4) | fdamm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Es ist spät. Der letzte Kommentar kann gelöscht werden. commented 2026-03-17 22:07:13 UTC by fdamm ♦1 |
| 167934011 (Comments: 1) | homero89 (Discussed changesets: 2) | please check for duplicates before importing... commented 2026-03-17 22:02:27 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 180015557 (Comments: 3) | Sarys (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi... nou eigenlijk niet. Alle gebruikers hebben dit probleem bij iets nieuws toevoegen. Maar een bestaande adresnode bewerken gaat dan weer wel? Sommigen passen het later aan met een reguliere editor op de pc. Je zou het eens kunnen opw... commented 2026-03-17 21:54:04 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 64481287 (Comments: 1) | Sidapo (Discussed changesets: 8) | node/6060490877/history has stone_type = khachkar that was added in this edit What is here? Boulder with carved khachkar ? In such case stone_type=khachkar makes sense and should not be marked as deprecated Or it is it a carved slab?... commented 2026-03-17 21:50:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 130259694 (Comments: 1) | Sidapo (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10273977710/history has stone_type = khachkar that was added in this edit What is here? Boulder with carved khachkar ? In such case https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:stone_type%3Dkhachkar make... commented 2026-03-17 21:50:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180029542 (Comments: 1) | Midwest Wellness Lounge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 21:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179908364 (Comments: 4) | imjustmappin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there :) there are some debatable things going on here: - sidewalkd crossing driveways don't need a highway=crossing node, at least that's what I took from the forum discussions. - you nestled several landuses here. ... commented 2026-03-17 21:38:35 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 177815568 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180028895 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-17 21:34:17 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 172889038 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612672784/ "name=Historic Winch" seems like an odd name for a commercial area. commented 2026-03-17 21:27:29 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 179984262 (Comments: 1) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 12) | This path is not passable, it is blocked on both ends to prevent access. commented 2026-03-17 21:24:15 UTC by I am Vigo ♦1 |
| 180028673 (Comments: 1) | ash3212 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9341246080 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-17 21:21:29 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 175489164 (Comments: 1) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 9) | HI Pernycek, ist das Museum wieder geöffnet? laut wiki hat es 2020 geschlossen. Auch der User im Hinweis meint es ist geschlossen. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_der_Johann_Strauss_Dynastie commented 2026-03-17 21:21:06 UTC by mapperich ♦53 |
| 180027110 (Comments: 1) | Александр Шушко (Discussed changesets: 1) | Разве? Имеется же в виду Мир как World, а не Peace, значит на бел. языке будет Свет, а не Мір. commented 2026-03-17 21:16:06 UTC by HantDX ♦55 |
| 179920875 (Comments: 2) | Fidelis Assis (Discussed changesets: 40) | When updating the limits of an administrative relation, one must download all members of the parent relations of a small changed way to check if nothing else was broken. Sometimes, the small updated way is also part of very large relations (ex. timez... commented 2026-03-17 21:08:21 UTC by Fidelis Assis ♦40 |
| 179981675 (Comments: 1) | Waldis2009 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Здравствуйте! В ваших правках очень много ошибок: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8039217 поломана граница https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489651000 некорректны... commented 2026-03-17 21:02:41 UTC by mini-me ♦268 |
| 174266785 (Comments: 1) | Navigatus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Thank you for the supercharger! I updated this supercharger slightly. I suggest to check the wiki about charging_stations https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station The guidelines have changed a lot i... commented 2026-03-17 21:02:35 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 177542749 (Comments: 2) | DanGregory (Discussed changesets: 22) | Inconclusive, I gather, viz: "landuse=farmland - An area of farmland used for tillage (cropland). This tag is sometimes also used for pasture or meadow." I think farmland nicely covers everything. We also have the interesting question of la... commented 2026-03-17 21:00:34 UTC by DanGregory ♦6 |
| 180014712 (Comments: 1) | Satoshi Team (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2026-03-17 20:49:41 UTC by Comino ♦323 |
| 175862885 (Comments: 2) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 121) | Ono aj zalezi, ako dlho je to docasne, ci to stihnu pouzivatelia aj vyuzit. Toto klzisko tu bolo 4 mesiace, tak to uz podla mna bolo celkom zaujimave pre OSM. Ale uz skoncilo, dam ho prec. commented 2026-03-17 20:47:50 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,819 |
| 180027296 (Comments: 2) | Christian Zehaczek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9901616138 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-17 20:46:08 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 178965209 (Comments: 9) | NGL-engel (Discussed changesets: 102) | Danke, Zuhören geht schonmal, nur reden und Kamera bekommen ich nicht auf die schnelle hin ... commented 2026-03-17 20:36:10 UTC by NGL-engel ♦113 |
| 180026996 (Comments: 1) | HyperionIX (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-17 20:30:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 156137963 (Comments: 1) | die HOCHKÖNIGIN - Mountain Resort (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, schön dass du so enthusiastisch bei OSM dabei bist. Bitte sei dabei aber etwas vorsichtiger. In dieser Änderung hast du Hotelterrassen als Parks eingetragen, Gebäude mit Höhen von über 800 Metern eingetragen, nicht &uu... commented 2026-03-17 20:29:10 UTC by Heilige Maria ♦1 |
| 165593728 (Comments: 9) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 123) | Ah sorry, I wasn't the one to be answering this xd But I want to know that as well commented 2026-03-17 20:28:11 UTC by Anas masuris ♦170 |
| 173500610 (Comments: 8) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Danke für's Nachsehen vor Ort. commented 2026-03-17 20:27:54 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦72 |
| 179920128 (Comments: 1) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 13) | thanks for fix! commented 2026-03-17 20:27:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 133515997 (Comments: 2) | murble (Discussed changesets: 20) | I believe it should actually be শাহীবাগ so probably Hindi. commented 2026-03-17 20:25:36 UTC by murble ♦28 |
| 179984551 (Comments: 10) | LovelyPL (Discussed changesets: 8) | ale jak prowadza do lasu i na pole i się kończą ślepo to jest to highway=track, może highway=service commented 2026-03-17 20:23:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
 | 180020234 (Comments: 1) | RAOINBEN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4284071571 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-17 20:21:24 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180018272 (Comments: 1) | gontnhtumo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2967234874 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-17 20:21:08 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
 | 180015819 (Comments: 2) | Alisher02 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11093656410, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9735573040 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move t... commented 2026-03-17 20:20:59 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180014983 (Comments: 1) | JLMLH365 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6605488244, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8236460242 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move th... commented 2026-03-17 20:19:45 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179189212 (Comments: 2) | NGL-engel (Discussed changesets: 102) | Danke fürs korrigieren commented 2026-03-17 20:15:19 UTC by NGL-engel ♦113 |
| 179866116 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 69) | dzięki! BDOTa się nie spodziewałem commented 2026-03-17 20:15:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179831973 (Comments: 3) | NGL-engel (Discussed changesets: 102) | Stichwort Zugänglichkeit: Viele Wege im westlichen und südlichen Wald sind mit „traffic_sign=DE:260” gekennzeichnet. Das soll laut dem Verkehrszeichen Tool https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs= mit „motor_vehicle=no&r... commented 2026-03-17 20:13:36 UTC by NGL-engel ♦113 |
| 167091462 (Comments: 3) | ERU_Mentz (Discussed changesets: 4) | it does not seem changed commented 2026-03-17 20:10:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 180026089 (Comments: 1) | crushtheserpent (Discussed changesets: 16) | I also removed recently added duplicate info from a Home Depot. Most of the information was already present in another way that is the outline of the entire store complex, not just the building. commented 2026-03-17 19:58:01 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦20 |
 | 169639526 (Comments: 1) | Abdulhameed Isah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13032418055/history has shop = printing_and_photocopying that was added in this edit shop=printing_and_photocopying ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.ope... commented 2026-03-17 19:56:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 176023181 (Comments: 4) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hmm https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Black_Dragon1701 sagte 4 Ampeln und hatte das such so mit SC eingetragen commented 2026-03-17 19:56:03 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 179540367 (Comments: 2) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hallo Openminded320, Hattest du meine ersten Fragen oben zu deinem Änderungssatz gelesen? Gruß von Stephan commented 2026-03-17 19:38:25 UTC by stephan75 ♦68 |
| 179641354 (Comments: 2) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 30) | Petite relance pour que vous puissiez corriger rapidement 😉 commented 2026-03-17 19:37:45 UTC by jbcharron ♦161 |
| 179953285 (Comments: 3) | Xuth666 (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem, you’ve got up to speed fast! I’ve just submitted a few more tweaks to what you’ve done today, but nothing major. One thing to note is that driveways for houses should be tagged as access=private as they&rsq... commented 2026-03-17 19:26:39 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,019 |
| 177857554 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180024969 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-17 19:16:34 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179878877 (Comments: 3) | Thomas Goyne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, I'll fix it! commented 2026-03-17 19:05:14 UTC by cuzi ♦151 |
| 179828732 (Comments: 4) | Toto2642 (Discussed changesets: 12) | J'ai l'impression que ça amène _un chouïa_ plus de précision, mais bon c'est pas non plus la panacée c'est sûr 😅 Comme tu sens 🤷 Bonne semaine BTW ! 🌼 commented 2026-03-17 19:04:29 UTC by Toto2642 ♦11 |
| 180018596 (Comments: 4) | gially86 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Grazie a te ovviamente :) commented 2026-03-17 19:04:14 UTC by gially86 ♦1 |
| 170758818 (Comments: 1) | Debal Das (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up the SEO spam and fixed the mess of address tagging as best I was able (given that none of the many POIs around this had proper address tags, I could not easily determine local OSM addressing convention): https://www.openstreetmap.org/chang... commented 2026-03-17 18:53:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦111 |
| 177881154 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180024113 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-17 18:49:57 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 177898279 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180023332 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-17 18:46:40 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 180017483 (Comments: 1) | DoToDo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Здравствуйте! Принятая схема оформления закреплена на вики, прошу ознакомиться: https://osm.wiki/RU:Набережные_Челны Исправил в 180023966. commented 2026-03-17 18:44:55 UTC by CometSeeker ♦26 |
 | 179943075 (Comments: 2) | JFL-75 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi Fran S, thanks for your alert. I always check the validation tool before validating a tile. Could you indicate the task # you are talking about. I would like to see the reason why something wrong happened. Regards. commented 2026-03-17 18:44:07 UTC by JFL-75 ♦6 |
| 180023696 (Comments: 1) | 500384947 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 18:39:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179775132 (Comments: 1) | mdroads (Discussed changesets: 32) | The road alignments here prior to your changeset were up-to-date. The new alignments are more visible in the Esri imagery which is dated Feb 22, 2025. commented 2026-03-17 18:24:44 UTC by Joseph R P ♦414 |
| 180021218 (Comments: 4) | 73616e646572 (Discussed changesets: 6) | De hoogtes zal ik binnenkort toevoegen, ook voor het gebruik via ShadeMap. commented 2026-03-17 18:20:01 UTC by 73616e646572 ♦2 |
| 180020816 (Comments: 2) | ReyDerayos24 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hecho, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180022488 Saludos commented 2026-03-17 18:10:52 UTC by ReyDerayos24 ♦9 |
| 179988478 (Comments: 3) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 255) | Ah ok, I just tried doing a route and it seems to work - thanks Bernard! commented 2026-03-17 18:06:11 UTC by pmuk ♦1 |
| 179993073 (Comments: 1) | niki88z (Discussed changesets: 18) | За такива екзотични имена е полезно да се добавя и name:etymology:wikidata=* :) commented 2026-03-17 17:55:42 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦838 |
| 179991027 (Comments: 1) | drzewik1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Nie rób czegoś takiego jak "drobne poprawy na terenie całej Polski". Staraj się robić mniejsze zestawy zmian, bardziej lokalnie. Jeśli ma wyjść coś większego niż miasto, to powinno być lepiej opisane. Tak to w innych miast... commented 2026-03-17 17:53:58 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦388 |
| 180000306 (Comments: 2) | Inplace Studio (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=* Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry. commented 2026-03-17 17:33:17 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179594718 (Comments: 2) | 500377372 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020676 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-17 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179583976 (Comments: 2) | The Fine Line Automotive Detailing Studio (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020672 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-17 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179583841 (Comments: 2) | tellatabi (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020668 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-17 17:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179582086 (Comments: 2) | bloody_paisen86 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020656 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-17 17:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179575885 (Comments: 2) | filfilmke (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020655 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-17 17:33:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179996675 (Comments: 2) | Bustycat (Discussed changesets: 14) | > 區道/鄉道屬於積年累月爛問題 我沒意見 AS-IS即可 SOLVED commented 2026-03-17 17:33:06 UTC by assanges ♦33 |
| 179572371 (Comments: 2) | ruscoexteriors (Discussed changesets: 1) | ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179944647 commented 2026-03-17 17:33:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179562616 (Comments: 2) | travel pesona belitung (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/180020642 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here. commented 2026-03-17 17:33:03 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 180020594 (Comments: 1) | EvanSiroky (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source: https://southgaterecandpark.gov/wp-content/uploads/Southgate-Facilities-Map-2022.pdf commented 2026-03-17 17:32:30 UTC by EvanSiroky ♦63 |
| 177973020 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180019526 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-17 17:28:01 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179967522 (Comments: 4) | lkmn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Poprawiłem commented 2026-03-17 17:17:04 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179864200 (Comments: 2) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 45) | Why? These are more or less equivalent, and were only recently deprecated. hence should stay for a while so consumer apps can catch up. socket:tesla_supercharger_ccs=14 socket:tesla_supercharger_ccs:output=150 kW it's why I a... commented 2026-03-17 17:13:51 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 179889678 (Comments: 3) | vilof (Discussed changesets: 1) | Super, vdaka! :) commented 2026-03-17 16:58:45 UTC by ticho2 ♦34 |
| 177979205 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/180018512 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-17 16:55:09 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179953842 (Comments: 1) | kobejim2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for going back to clean up. Much appreciated. I did find a couple of near-fixes that you should be careful of going forward. See the area around https://openstreetmap.org/node/10274269213 for an example of a fairway still crossing a green. ... commented 2026-03-17 16:50:30 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179964932 (Comments: 3) | molinamos (Discussed changesets: 3) | I've never looked that close before. thanks for pointing it out. commented 2026-03-17 16:50:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 179927648 (Comments: 1) | Esther_Rims (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please make sure fairways and greens don't intersect/overlap. Same can be said for the various other golf areas as well (tees, bunkers, water hazards, etc) commented 2026-03-17 16:43:36 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 174835603 (Comments: 2) | is-zUser (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sorry, an der Stelle hatte ich mich auf das (veraltete!) Luftbild verlassen. Danke für die Korrektur. commented 2026-03-17 16:41:58 UTC by is-zUser ♦37 |
| 180013541 (Comments: 2) | Sjottie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Pad doorverbonden Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180013541 commented 2026-03-17 16:37:45 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 178732926 (Comments: 1) | detective-fiasco (Discussed changesets: 17) | Zdravím, omlouvám se, nezkontroloval jsem si, zda-li jsou mapové podklady aktuální. Tato úprava změnila stav zpět na stav před rekonstrukcí. Nyní už je vše opět v pořádku commented 2026-03-17 16:32:53 UTC by detective-fiasco ♦23 |
| 180016932 (Comments: 1) | 500380215 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 16:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180010799 (Comments: 1) | siewo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Die Ergänzung von bicycle und foot "yes" ist in dem Fall unnötig. Siehe dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany commented 2026-03-17 16:30:11 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,042 |
| 180010006 (Comments: 1) | Thomas Oudsen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-17 16:22:18 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180008164 (Comments: 1) | rymeamine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenu·e dans OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489774878#map=19/47.798475/-3.318806 (par exemple) est une voie privée (on le voit sur la couche cadastre : fait partie de la parcelle de la maison). hig... commented 2026-03-17 16:15:59 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 180008012 (Comments: 1) | melLH56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, bienvenu·e dans OpenStreetMap, reste encore basin=infiltration en trop. commented 2026-03-17 16:09:53 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 180007940 (Comments: 1) | jd010910 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rebonjour, air ici s'écrit aire (une aire). Mais surtout c'est un nom description, à ne pas mettre dans name, dans name on ne met que des noms propres. addr:city addr:postcode addr:street n'apportent pas grand ch... commented 2026-03-17 16:07:02 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 180007615 (Comments: 1) | jd010910 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap. Ici visiblement une erreur : vous (ou tu, comme tu veux) avez remplacé une zone résidentielle par une grande aire de jeux ! commented 2026-03-17 16:02:58 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 179827272 (Comments: 1) | AntiCompositeNumber (Discussed changesets: 11) | fixed area to just the park area and not the entire parcel owned by the town which included cemetery and transfer station. commented 2026-03-17 16:02:12 UTC by dkwolf ♦7 |
| 88204761 (Comments: 1) | cx05 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why was this additional house number created? Because of a door to a garage? commented 2026-03-17 16:01:31 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 180009024 (Comments: 1) | Lorenzo_jln (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5962889967 : crossing:markings=zebra serait plus précis. Sur PCRS raster (fond d'écran plus précis mais un peu plus vieux) on voit aussi qu'il ... commented 2026-03-17 15:51:12 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 179818917 (Comments: 3) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 230) | Dzięki za wyjaśnienie W takim razie wycofam ten zestaw zmian ale usunę nazwy ze ścieżek. Zostawię railway=abandoned tam, gdzie ścieżka faktycznie biegnie po dawnym nasypie kolejowym, i jeszcze to dopracuję. commented 2026-03-17 15:41:28 UTC by P_kawa ♦18 |
| 180014152 (Comments: 1) | CyberViet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 15:39:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180014060 (Comments: 1) | Warnow Moments (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 15:36:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 142139248 (Comments: 1) | KoiAndBlueBird (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, there is access tags and also camp_site=basic to indicate that there is nothing there. I changed it accordingly here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180013586 But I would also be quite happy for the node to go away al... commented 2026-03-17 15:26:38 UTC by supsup ♦15 |
| 180010537 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit, fixed in changeset/180013549 commented 2026-03-17 15:25:25 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 180009727 (Comments: 2) | Lily Rivera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7655138779 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-17 15:23:28 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180010180 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit and missed a segment, fixed in changeset/180013418 commented 2026-03-17 15:23:22 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 179721125 (Comments: 2) | frokor_import (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ok, thanks. Fixed those I have added. commented 2026-03-17 15:23:12 UTC by frokor_import ♦1 |
| 180013230 (Comments: 1) | 500385405 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 15:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180005886 (Comments: 1) | math007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo and welkom. Bedankt voor je bijdrage en voor de duidelijke beschrijving. Maak er de volgende keer aub twee aparte uploads van: één voor de huizen in één gebied en een aparte upload voor de wegen aan de andere... commented 2026-03-17 15:18:45 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 180009692 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit, fixed in changeset/180013217 commented 2026-03-17 15:18:36 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 178050814 (Comments: 1) | Matthieu HUGOT (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, idem c'est plutot une piste cyclable avec séparation piéton ? commented 2026-03-17 15:18:27 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦193 |
| 180009928 (Comments: 1) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Changeset comment should actually say "Updated Faleza Tulcea" commented 2026-03-17 15:18:13 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦14 |
| 180009003 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit fixed in changeset/180012901 commented 2026-03-17 15:16:25 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 180009384 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit fixed in changeset/180013059 commented 2026-03-17 15:15:04 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 180006433 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit, fixed in changeset/180012644 commented 2026-03-17 15:06:45 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 175439249 (Comments: 1) | Matthieu HUGOT (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, concernant la piste rue Roger salengro à Hulluch, on est plutôt sur un highway = cycleway + traffic_sign = FR:C113 + segregated = yes Il n'y a pas de statut de voie verte sur cette piste commented 2026-03-17 15:06:31 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦193 |
| 176411949 (Comments: 4) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 119) | Per lo piu' si fa che • si prende l'area e ci mette landuse=residential (o, se si tratta solo di 1 o 2 case, allora landuse=farmyard). Ci sono anche subtag di residential=* che si puo' usare per precisare la tipologia dell&... commented 2026-03-17 15:01:15 UTC by GBAB ♦114 |
| 102820953 (Comments: 5) | StopConsuming_StartProducing (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello, I am going through backcountry=yes that do not have a tourism=camp_site. I changed the tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180012144 I think either it should be deleted or it should be properly tagged. Inteligent renderer... commented 2026-03-17 14:57:31 UTC by supsup ♦15 |
| 179893974 (Comments: 2) | trailschneck (Discussed changesets: 63) | Adressen taugt man ja auch entweder mit einem Adresstag oder entsprechenden Einträgen zum Gebäude und nicht in irgendwelchen Betreibereinträgen. Sonst passiert genau das hier. Hab einen Adresstag zugefügt. commented 2026-03-17 14:57:16 UTC by trailschneck ♦52 |
| 179767724 (Comments: 4) | kamillz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Den må have været smuttet i farten commented 2026-03-17 14:55:13 UTC by kamillz ♦4 |
| 179820419 (Comments: 1) | IanAD123 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ian, would you know if this pipeline is still in use? and if so is this still fuel commented 2026-03-17 14:53:36 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 180009514 (Comments: 1) | six serven (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/180011487 commented 2026-03-17 14:45:07 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,623 |
| 179988826 (Comments: 2) | Икчпук (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, A67-A67! OMG! Sorry I got confused with the names and deleted them. I'll try to be more careful. Peace and have a nice day! commented 2026-03-17 14:39:53 UTC by Икчпук ♦4 |
| 179640007 (Comments: 3) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 30) | The wrong tags are still there: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22Cbicycle_parking%22%3D*+global&R commented 2026-03-17 14:36:43 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 180011165 (Comments: 1) | Brian MacPherson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 14:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179947804 (Comments: 3) | UnknownV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buenísimo, gracias commented 2026-03-17 14:36:31 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 117406845 (Comments: 1) | DiaouligRu (Discussed changesets: 24) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252660418 : salut, il vaut mieux supprimer la namite (name=lavoir) que de la propager en breton ! commented 2026-03-17 14:33:23 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 179820194 (Comments: 1) | IanAD123 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Ian, you must be local to add this kind of detail the parish. Would you be able to add paths, gates and more detail to the churchyard? commented 2026-03-17 14:32:05 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 179974821 (Comments: 3) | Arktorus (Discussed changesets: 18) | Esri commented 2026-03-17 14:30:20 UTC by Arktorus ♦7 |
| 179999088 (Comments: 1) | Tomasz Mleczek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Według Państwowego Rejestru Nazw Geograficznych to zbiornik nosi nazwę Pilzno https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=908E9E53-85E3-49CF-8237-2FB0717DECA5 Proponuję skontaktować się z gminą... commented 2026-03-17 14:30:19 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦616 |
| 180010689 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Barion (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-17 14:27:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180005936 (Comments: 1) | Ale_CA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Transformó un jardín infantil en un árbol. Asumo que se trató de un error. Fue Corregido. gracias --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180005936 ... commented 2026-03-17 14:25:19 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179589204 (Comments: 1) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bonjour, ne devrait on pas passer ce chemin en voie verte highway = path accessible au riverain et agriculteur ? Il y a bien un panneau voie verte d'un coté et B7b de l'autre. commented 2026-03-17 14:23:47 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦193 |
| 180008489 (Comments: 2) | FrancoPuga (Discussed changesets: 1) | Además ya estaban dibujadas. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180008489 commented 2026-03-17 14:22:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 180010217 (Comments: 1) | meli victoria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-17 14:18:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179820129 (Comments: 1) | IanAD123 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi IanAD123, Thanks for spotting the changed road name. commented 2026-03-17 14:16:09 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 179969360 (Comments: 1) | CrstblM (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola. Esa no es la forma de ningún edificio que esté ahí. Ya fue corregido a farmyard. por favor atención con esas coas. gracias --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... commented 2026-03-17 14:10:23 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 175886910 (Comments: 1) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hallo, Zufahrten zu Haltestellen sollten mMn. kein highway=busway sein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway#What_is_not_a_busway https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_Rapid_Transit commented 2026-03-17 14:02:15 UTC by Luzandro ♦985 |
| 179952536 (Comments: 1) | uk_mapfan_2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's not correct because it's not open railway=platform require area tag due to a bug in OSM-Carto. Reverting. commented 2026-03-17 14:01:35 UTC by DaveF ♦1,616 |
| 179952485 (Comments: 1) | ItsSimonT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, is some of this estate already occupied? commented 2026-03-17 14:01:10 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 176272181 (Comments: 1) | j numminen (Discussed changesets: 50) | Saimme sen suuntaista palautetta että Postiljoonintaival -kadun kevyen liikenteen väylä olisi jälleen suljettu kävely- ja pyöräliikenteenltä. Onko sinulla mahdollisesti tällaisesta tietoa tai havaintoja? |
| 180008856 (Comments: 1) | 2310Barber (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 13:48:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 170656100 (Comments: 1) | Jojoasante4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jojoasante4, Firstly, thanks for contributing to the OSM. It's great to see people adding to the map. Could you tell me how did you get the current layout. Those streets are not yet visible on available imagery so it must have been ... commented 2026-03-17 13:48:27 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 159917629 (Comments: 4) | Ekaterina Nov G (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, The building is reverted back. Is it correct? commented 2026-03-17 13:32:30 UTC by Ekaterina Nov G ♦3 |
| 159917601 (Comments: 4) | Ekaterina Nov G (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, The building is reverted back. Is it correct? commented 2026-03-17 13:29:09 UTC by Ekaterina Nov G ♦3 |
| 175965040 (Comments: 1) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bonjour, on est bien sur une voie verte ? en aérien on voit une séparation vélo dans les deux sens qui indiquerait plutot une piste cyclable bidi. Présence d'un panneau voie verte ? J'ai mis un bicycle yes su... commented 2026-03-17 13:28:14 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦193 |
| 179977324 (Comments: 1) | Brenda Cortes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Agregó otras tres veces lo que ya estaba una vez. Además, por favor, escribir con capitalización normal. saludos commented 2026-03-17 13:25:45 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179909855 (Comments: 2) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 140) | I guess this would be explanation as to what has happened: https://www.retailgazette.co.uk/blog/2024/07/tapi-buys-carpetright/ commented 2026-03-17 13:22:43 UTC by dzidek23 ♦82 |
| 180005527 (Comments: 2) | Cartaligula (Discussed changesets: 3) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar het erf. commented 2026-03-17 13:21:33 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180000147 (Comments: 2) | Rilapp (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4233040710 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-17 13:20:33 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179997067 (Comments: 1) | Ezra Edwards (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5256956355 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-17 13:20:22 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 141437157 (Comments: 1) | m_p_13 (Discussed changesets: 160) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4467274 commented 2026-03-17 13:04:37 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,800 |
| 180000511 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006724. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 13:03:03 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180000206 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006642#map=17/42.531141/-70.918626. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 13:01:41 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180006642 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | This changeset is the correction of the wrong tag from the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180000206. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 13:01:19 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179990989 (Comments: 2) | Monsieur_J (Discussed changesets: 14) | Autant pour moi. J’ignorerai ça, j’y ferai attention car je pense que c’est un automatisme de GoMap quand on ferme un way commented 2026-03-17 12:58:04 UTC by Monsieur_J ♦5 |
| 180004677 (Comments: 1) | Grupo Safamotor (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hola. Gracias por los cambios. Algunas pequeñas correcciones: - Usamos guiones para las fechas, p. ej.: 2026-03-17 - Para introducir el código wikidata de la marca, usamos «brand:wikidata»: https://wi... commented 2026-03-17 12:52:18 UTC by dcapillae ♦397 |
| 180004710 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006133. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 12:50:08 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180004376 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006048. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 12:48:19 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179998620 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The redundant and incrrect tags have since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180005918. commented 2026-03-17 12:45:40 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179998668 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The redundant and incrrect tags have since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180005918. commented 2026-03-17 12:45:38 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180002413 (Comments: 3) | Juke9573 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nou.. Veel plezier met mappen. Houd je niet in 😀 commented 2026-03-17 12:38:07 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180005325 (Comments: 1) | cpalogic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 12:36:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 161332224 (Comments: 3) | user_5589 (Discussed changesets: 60) | You can thanks a import from Bulgaria that was using the values in cm... so we looked at some other outliers. commented 2026-03-17 12:30:37 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 179969573 (Comments: 4) | cpa8 (Discussed changesets: 5) | C'est tout bon cette fois ! commented 2026-03-17 12:28:15 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 179998492 (Comments: 3) | 73616e646572 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nou eigenlijk als je een aanwijzing geeft aan medemappers zou je nog beter note= kunnen gebruiken. description is voor eindgebruikers. Good practice https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice name=... gebruiken ... commented 2026-03-17 12:26:07 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179099712 (Comments: 4) | Dengue Barra Mansa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Entendi, agradeço a orientação. Tem coisas que no próprio mapa da prefeitura está desatualizado, eles devem ter se baseado em algum outro mais antigo de repente. Nesse caso do bairro, deve ser alguma sublocalidade d... commented 2026-03-17 12:18:28 UTC by Dengue Barra Mansa ♦1 |
| 176674421 (Comments: 5) | HugoC01 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Effectivement... Tu as raison commented 2026-03-17 12:11:03 UTC by HugoC01 ♦52 |
| 179449876 (Comments: 4) | sly (Discussed changesets: 10) | Aller, tu m'as convaincu... et comme une discussion ici sur un changeset n'est pas très pratique, je ré-utilise le sujet sur le forum OSM-fr ici : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/massifs-montagneux-de-france/2743/5 pour ouvri... commented 2026-03-17 12:09:12 UTC by sly ♦16 |
| 178889634 (Comments: 2) | salgo60 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Tackar det är mer skit bakom spakarna och manuel hantering Jag har inte blivit kompis med OSM editorn tycker inte relationen dyker upp så jag kan koppla ihop grejerna naturreservatet skall vara en relation som bestå... commented 2026-03-17 12:08:04 UTC by salgo60 ♦16 |
| 179706364 (Comments: 1) | Tseodoric (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, while acknowledging that Arpitan/Francoprovençal can be spoken in these regions, it would seem unlikely that you would know all these names 1st hand knowledge. Could you please disclose from where or how you are sourcing these nam... commented 2026-03-17 12:05:44 UTC by SimonPoole ♦366 |
| 179964177 (Comments: 5) | herbinator (Discussed changesets: 10) | Oke duidelijk.. Nee.. zo'n museum floept niet naar een andere locatie. 😀 Het zou best in te bouwen zijn, maar zover is het nog niet. commented 2026-03-17 11:58:48 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179953702 (Comments: 2) | Vandana@28 (Discussed changesets: 5) | acknowledge. going forward will take care commented 2026-03-17 11:52:38 UTC by Vandana@28 ♦2 |
| 179976523 (Comments: 1) | EVG941 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Por favor no agregar información provada ni nombres descriptivos. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179976523 commented 2026-03-17 11:52:33 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179888379 (Comments: 1) | potnyast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 180002462 commented 2026-03-17 11:50:58 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 179952185 (Comments: 2) | pidugu konda reddy (Discussed changesets: 787) | Acknowledged. Going forward will take care of those tags now only we got this update going forward will take care. Thank you commented 2026-03-17 11:40:41 UTC by pidugu konda reddy ♦6 |
| 177955605 (Comments: 1) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 40) | Ma il CAP non è 38122? commented 2026-03-17 11:33:58 UTC by aboc ♦21 |
| 179999072 (Comments: 1) | Rocksint (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Beter geen motor_vehicle=no taggen op een paaltje. Dat geeft weer problemen met moped en mofa. horse=yes is ook ... commented 2026-03-17 11:27:24 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 180000682 (Comments: 1) | MarieeParisienne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 11:24:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 180000579 (Comments: 1) | Dom pogrzebowy Służew (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 11:24:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 169107977 (Comments: 2) | Flayer (Discussed changesets: 75) | OK, Done. commented 2026-03-17 11:18:07 UTC by Flayer ♦48 |
| 179783068 (Comments: 2) | MaunaLoaMountain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello mweper, thank you for your input and local knowledge. I have changed access=private onto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4150214346). commented 2026-03-17 11:18:00 UTC by MaunaLoaMountain ♦1 |
| 180000465 (Comments: 1) | Colbertson (Discussed changesets: 30) | oops, was using upload selection and didnt quite select all of the previous changeset commented 2026-03-17 11:17:22 UTC by Colbertson ♦143 |
| 179999816 (Comments: 1) | Dom pogrzebowy Służew (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 11:06:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179585342 (Comments: 3) | Natur- und Geopark Steirische Eisenwurzen (Discussed changesets: 4) | @Wildsharky: bitte um Erklärung, ansonsten könnte man deinen Revert wieder revertieren. commented 2026-03-17 11:05:37 UTC by PPete2 ♦142 |
| 179949710 (Comments: 3) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 215) | 👍 commented 2026-03-17 10:57:55 UTC by rene78 ♦472 |
| X | 179963939 (Comments: 2) | Damir Bojev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179999246; 179999473 commented 2026-03-17 10:56:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179935181 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Correa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in changeset id: 179999020 commented 2026-03-17 10:52:28 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 174651723 (Comments: 2) | IliamnaLake (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Layft Greater! IliamnaLake is no longer on the team, so I will be handling this on their behalf. The ways were reclassified (http://openstreetmap.org/way/1366518639) for classification consistency. Did the same for (http://openstreetma... commented 2026-03-17 10:52:24 UTC by AraucaRiver ♦2 |
| 179913147 (Comments: 1) | Kali's Kiss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Made you tattoo parlor a separate Point of interest from the entrance address and added shop=tattoo to make it visible on the map. cheers commented 2026-03-17 10:51:54 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,479 |
| 179860625 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 79) | thanks ian. these people are forced to contribute to OSM by their uni professor, so i've reverted the rest of the poor quality edits commented 2026-03-17 10:49:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦468 |
| 179953904 (Comments: 7) | jj000 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Zou je buiten dat ik hier zeker geen voorstander van ben omdat het zaken onnodig complex maakt en het een wir war aan paden kruisingen en stoepen wordt. En wat is er tegen om het gewoon zo te houden? Maar als je het dan toch zo graag doet, iig de ju... commented 2026-03-17 10:45:33 UTC by Rubenke ♦50 |
| 179972340 (Comments: 1) | sscotty71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi sscotty71 Don't know for whom you made these wetland tags on viewpoints, renamed a street as seeming some walking route and used generic names like scene 1, 2, 3, 4 but these have no place on Openstreetmap. I have undone them. If these... commented 2026-03-17 10:42:21 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,479 |
| 178013245 (Comments: 1) | Franamberes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Buenas, no debemos introducir elementos ya inexistentes en OSM, para eso está OHM, donde puedes incluir las fechas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad commented 2026-03-17 10:38:59 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦271 |
| 179944638 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Correa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in changeset id 179997844 commented 2026-03-17 10:33:02 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 179995798 (Comments: 1) | ToniE (Discussed changesets: 229) | Sorry, ist Linie 212 commented 2026-03-17 10:18:00 UTC by ToniE ♦1,256 |
| 167258169 (Comments: 4) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 111) | Great. I completely agree. Suggested changes have been made. RB👋 commented 2026-03-17 10:15:30 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦109 |
| 179922427 (Comments: 1) | Uswah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:179996380 commented 2026-03-17 10:10:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 140837427 (Comments: 2) | SIG Agglo Montargis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179996089 commented 2026-03-17 10:04:30 UTC by habi ♦2,059 |
| 179993459 (Comments: 1) | darrellisrunning (Discussed changesets: 2) | oneway=no heeft inderdaad geen functie hier. commented 2026-03-17 10:00:07 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179993422 (Comments: 2) | CC2016 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Départ de randonnées guidées velo, pédestre , minibus, kayak au milieu d’une forêt au bord d’une rivière avec parking commented 2026-03-17 09:56:13 UTC by CC2016 ♦1 |
| 179995099 (Comments: 1) | Cerrajeros Gipuzkoa Merke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 09:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179755895 (Comments: 2) | Holly123456789 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the advice, I learned that after I'd already mapped out a few buildings so some may have been left un-squared. Will remember in the future :) commented 2026-03-17 09:51:48 UTC by Holly123456789 ♦1 |
| 179993356 (Comments: 1) | darrellisrunning (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. Zeker om OSM te doorgronden. foot=yes hoeft niet op fietspaden. .. net als bicycle=yes Dat is... commented 2026-03-17 09:46:20 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179877177 (Comments: 1) | Aarav588 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Aarav 588, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in the United Arab Emirates. I noticed that you added the 'ref' tag for some streets, for example: (w1465312042, w216080808, w95097247) I checked the Mapillary tracks to ... commented 2026-03-17 09:45:14 UTC by mona_magdy ♦21 |
| 179907539 (Comments: 1) | Ramil1992_General (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179994595 commented 2026-03-17 09:44:42 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 114275493 (Comments: 2) | syncronic (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo Martin, ich glaube nicht. Das ist nur eine Geschiebesperre. Der Pfad scheint so zu verlaufen, wie in der ÖK50 commented 2026-03-17 09:42:14 UTC by syncronic ♦42 |
| 179877238 (Comments: 1) | Aarav588 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Aarav 588, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in the United Arab Emirates. I noticed that you added the 'ref' tag for some streets, for example: (w139375947, w139375946, w307759093, w307759111, w139375945, w139375944) |
| 179856665 (Comments: 7) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 82) | Е, естествено, хубаво е да бъдат начертани и сгради, в които се помещават магазини, както тук Митко е направил. Но има и ненужни неща. commented 2026-03-17 09:32:50 UTC by Fraxi ♦292 |
| 179970561 (Comments: 1) | Hamandi2004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179993947 commented 2026-03-17 09:31:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179940893 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 71) | Veo que en ambos casos se trataría igualmente de elementos históricos, sin validez o utilidad actual, por lo que aplicaría de nuevo el criterio de mandarlo a OHM. commented 2026-03-17 09:30:13 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦271 |
| 179959461 (Comments: 2) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert of 179922358 commented 2026-03-17 09:17:37 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 177060355 (Comments: 3) | se7q38 (Discussed changesets: 9) | @Nakaner ich hatte es damals auch nicht verstanden und deshalb in www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177061308 nachgefragt da findest du eine Begründung. commented 2026-03-17 09:16:18 UTC by JanWendt ♦2 |
| 179970410 (Comments: 1) | I am Vigo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id 179992234 commented 2026-03-17 09:09:19 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 179992036 (Comments: 1) | EasyKoni (Discussed changesets: 4) | Mohon untuk menambahkan komentar perubahannya sebelum diunggah. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map!!/Submitting_Changes commented 2026-03-17 09:06:48 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 179614228 (Comments: 2) | Lucas1749 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Your edits #179614228 and #179614816 have been reverted. Please make sure that you're making edits are based on actual ground features. commented 2026-03-17 09:06:10 UTC by Higashimado ♦23 |
| 179991872 (Comments: 1) | Cuddpressure (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 09:03:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 141644 (Comments: 1) | Zdeno (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ahoj, k tomuto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4582674) mam otazku: resurvey access - je sem skutocne vstup aj vjazd sukromny v celej dlzke useku? commented 2026-03-17 09:03:21 UTC by Tomas_J ♦340 |
| 178497185 (Comments: 6) | Pikse (Discussed changesets: 11) | That's a disruptive editing campaign by Ótzï fón GlüϷgor/Otzie von Glühgor, and their new sockpupper account Иван2026. I now reported it to DWG. commented 2026-03-17 09:02:56 UTC by Pikse ♦228 |
| 179884280 (Comments: 1) | hhhm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179992019 commented 2026-03-17 09:01:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179987667 (Comments: 4) | dedaats (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke Kevin, Pas je het zelf weer aan naar een track met surface grass De tracktype dan ook weer aanpassen. Veel plezier met mappen, eggie commented 2026-03-17 08:58:29 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179792974 (Comments: 5) | Kartenfreund-AC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nein, eine solche zentrale Stelle gibt es nicht. OSM ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt, an dem jeder mitarbeiten kann. Regeln (oder eher Empfehlungen) werden von der Community beschlossen. Für das korrekte Taggen von Straßen und Wegen empfeh... commented 2026-03-17 08:55:58 UTC by aixbrick ♦894 |
| 179991362 (Comments: 1) | ArtPotion (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您好！欢迎来到 OSM 中国社区~ 您可以参阅中国标注指南进行编辑：osm.wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97 注意到您修改了韶关市内大量道路的道路等级，请问您是否有... commented 2026-03-17 08:53:48 UTC by Higashimado ♦23 |
| 167567828 (Comments: 1) | lp_ontour (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wann wird dieser Fahrradschuppen way/1272032352 gebaut werden? commented 2026-03-17 08:52:03 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 160109118 (Comments: 2) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 67) | Hi, they provide services and also sell things (see the assortment based on their web page below). I was just passing along, so I do not know more. There are some 17 hydraulics shops in osm now :) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=hydraulic... commented 2026-03-17 08:48:54 UTC by Tomas_J ♦340 |
| 179973155 (Comments: 1) | XXTENTATION (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi XXTENTATION, the name=* tag is used for official or recognised name of places. Using descriptions such as "field" is discouraged. Similarly, operator=* also takes a name. Physical tags such as amenity=bank or leisure=pitch describe what ... commented 2026-03-17 08:43:56 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦147 |
| 179849498 (Comments: 1) | Monymehsi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Duplicated highway removed, bridges removed. commented 2026-03-17 08:42:42 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,119 |
| 179618667 (Comments: 1) | Devanshi_Malik (Discussed changesets: 30) | This import has been reverted in the following changesets: 179990924,179990920,179990917,179990916,179990913,179990909,179990908 Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19969 commented 2026-03-17 08:37:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179990924 (Comments: 1) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 81) | The following changesets have been reverted: 179618667, 179600712, 179600705, 179600704, 179600699, 179600695, 179583670, 179583665, 179583660, 179583657, 179583648, 179583644, 179583637, 179583633, 179583625, 179583623, 179583622, 179583615, 1795836... commented 2026-03-17 08:35:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 162202943 (Comments: 2) | Caster89 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sorry thanks slipped, it meant to be building:part=yes and building:level=4. I removed the part however as the church was to complicated for me to define better using parts so eft it as it was commented 2026-03-17 08:30:51 UTC by Caster89 ♦5 |
| 179872430 (Comments: 1) | Monymehsi (Discussed changesets: 2) | An extensive duplicated highway was removed. commented 2026-03-17 08:30:36 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,119 |
| 179983692 (Comments: 1) | Yolynz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您好！欢迎来到 OSM 中国社区~ 您可以参阅中国标注指南进行编辑：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97 注意到您将大学路更改为了 highway=trunk 即... commented 2026-03-17 08:27:48 UTC by Higashimado ♦23 |
 | 179874063 (Comments: 1) | Kiran Bhatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplicated highway removed. commented 2026-03-17 08:25:13 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,119 |
| 179988912 (Comments: 4) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 48) | Le même dégât au 12 rue du Grand-Bureau https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2110709636/history et au 6 rue du Grand-Bureau https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2110709962/history commented 2026-03-17 08:23:34 UTC by 9_tab ♦24 |
| 179627922 (Comments: 1) | jayvardhansinghsisodia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Duplicated highways removed. commented 2026-03-17 08:20:53 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,119 |
| 171131687 (Comments: 1) | ChrystèleTAD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13103572574/history has telecom = 0559661460 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2026-03-17 08:19:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179583415 (Comments: 1) | jayvardhansinghsisodia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Duplicated highway sections removed. commented 2026-03-17 08:18:48 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,119 |
| 177193838 (Comments: 4) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 37) | Den kann ich dir zeigen :joy: Aber ja, das könnte man wirklich anpassen. Ich glaube, wir sollten bei solchen Stellen, vlt auch einen Kommentar mit einer Begründung adden. Nicht, dass jemand es dann wieder abändert (wie ich: "Oh... commented 2026-03-17 08:17:49 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦40 |
| 177850282 (Comments: 6) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 37) | Die Kieselsteine können auch etwas kleiner sein als auf dem Bild. Abgrenzung gravel/compacted ist meiner Meinung nach, ob die Schotterscheine größten Teils festgefahren ist. commented 2026-03-17 08:16:25 UTC by flex16 ♦70 |
| 178443798 (Comments: 3) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 37) | Die hattest du ja schon gesetzt. Danke! commented 2026-03-17 08:14:30 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦40 |
| 166539292 (Comments: 3) | m_fuhrmann (Discussed changesets: 37) | Habe es gefixt. commented 2026-03-17 08:13:30 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦40 |
| 179514291 (Comments: 1) | Faizuddin AbdulGani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplicated highway removed. commented 2026-03-17 07:59:53 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,119 |
| 129367281 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 469) | Bonjour, oui c'est une erreur que nous avons bien pris en compte depuis. Merci de votre alerte. Bonne journée commented 2026-03-17 07:46:49 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦289 |
| 166572607 (Comments: 2) | CMC56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | L'ancien petit cours d'eau a repris son lit et l'étang asséché fait place a une esplanade enherbée avec des passerelle et petit sentier et jeux d'installés. commented 2026-03-17 07:39:00 UTC by CMC56 ♦1 |
| 179941978 (Comments: 1) | TheHolyCessna (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489413840 exists? The track at the gate goes to the west. At the other end it looks like the car park is accessed by the driveway off Lydia Street. Thanks. commented 2026-03-17 07:32:32 UTC by TheSwavu ♦611 |
| 179884051 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for the feedback. I feel like this sort of topic has been discussed many times before, of whether to have many individual changesets or fewer but limited in scope. My conclusion is that there are various suitable tools to analyse his... commented 2026-03-17 07:29:58 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦364 |
| 179962325 (Comments: 1) | Omega (Bitcoin Ikorodu) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-03-17 07:29:43 UTC by Comino ♦323 |
| 179961231 (Comments: 2) | 騎貢丸上學 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Good afternoon Supaplex! Currently, there are no sharrow or shared lane markings on the pavement at this location. Therefore, cycleway:both=no was set to reflect the lack of dedicated infrastructure. However, bicycles are still legally allowed to... commented 2026-03-17 07:18:10 UTC by 騎貢丸上學 ♦2 |
| 176127475 (Comments: 5) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 82) | Changed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179986879 commented 2026-03-17 07:15:42 UTC by chnuessli ♦126 |
| 179985782 (Comments: 1) | nthc1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-17 06:57:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179883615 (Comments: 1) | Emersade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179984773 commented 2026-03-17 06:45:57 UTC by rajdhani ♦27 |
| 168013970 (Comments: 1) | captaininler (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2179900058/history has pedestrian = yes that was added in this edit Was it supposed to mark legal pedestrian access? In such case - foot=yes is the normal tag for it, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... commented 2026-03-17 06:44:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 173778543 (Comments: 1) | aussiegeek (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13257017613/history has pedestrian = yes that was added in this edit Was it supposed to mark legal pedestrian access? In such case - foot=yes is the normal tag for it, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2026-03-17 06:44:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179904897 (Comments: 1) | khag7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13650119808/history has pedestrian = yes that was added in this edit Was it supposed to mark legal pedestrian access? In such case - foot=yes is the normal tag for it, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2026-03-17 06:43:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 153854974 (Comments: 1) | artos42 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Jak rozumiem z tego przebiegu nic nie jest teraz widoczne w terenie? commented 2026-03-17 06:43:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 137997879 (Comments: 5) | polarfuchs2000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | > The viewpoint is attractive to tourists for its views, but the memorials themselves are not a main destination and have no historical protection. historic=memorial is used also for entirely regular memorials without historical protection commented 2026-03-17 06:42:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 53658642 (Comments: 1) | Isaev_Maxim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102246406/history has building:part = 4 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2026-03-17 06:39:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179954676 (Comments: 2) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | so ist es! commented 2026-03-17 06:36:36 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 179952973 (Comments: 2) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | für den Teilabschnitt, ja. commented 2026-03-17 06:33:59 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 179465836 (Comments: 4) | CIMDigital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your reply here. Your added description was not factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Feel free to add your business again. commented 2026-03-17 06:32:52 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179883786 (Comments: 2) | NeisRevert (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thank you for your reply here. Your added description was not factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Feel free to add your business again. commented 2026-03-17 06:32:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179953213 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | steht auch so in der bei amazon erhälzlichen Karte "Hauptfriedhof - Wanderungen - Wege - Wissenswertes " commented 2026-03-17 06:31:45 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 179952134 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | ...die Zusätze in Klammern habe ich rausgenommen. commented 2026-03-17 06:29:56 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 179890780 (Comments: 4) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | wo ist hier das Problem commented 2026-03-17 06:28:23 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 179975157 (Comments: 5) | lncvyz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for fixing @jm428 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179977014 commented 2026-03-17 06:26:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179915544 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM15 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Здравствуйте. Прошу прощения. Все исправила. commented 2026-03-17 05:50:32 UTC by Ozon OSM15 ♦18 |
| 179950986 (Comments: 1) | Bustycat (Discussed changesets: 14) | 直接寄私訊吧，在這裡罵人是沒有用的 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179950986 commented 2026-03-17 05:47:24 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,257 |
| 179973088 (Comments: 2) | 500374808 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-17 05:33:21 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179971969 (Comments: 2) | 500384835 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-17 05:33:21 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179962139 (Comments: 2) | 500384615 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-17 05:33:20 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179962324 (Comments: 2) | 500384796 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-17 05:33:20 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179976882 (Comments: 2) | KD Pest Control (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=* Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry. commented 2026-03-17 05:33:17 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179554846 (Comments: 2) | Forge H (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179982392 commented 2026-03-17 05:33:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179554689 (Comments: 2) | Forge H (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179982392 commented 2026-03-17 05:33:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179554499 (Comments: 2) | Forge H (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179554689 commented 2026-03-17 05:33:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179553534 (Comments: 2) | Forge H (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179982392 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-17 05:33:09 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179551494 (Comments: 2) | Waschsalon Stuttgart Washpoint (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179982387 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-17 05:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179550579 (Comments: 2) | Dubrovnik Heights (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179553063 commented 2026-03-17 05:33:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179546935 (Comments: 2) | Daniel Joshua jdj (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179982385 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here. commented 2026-03-17 05:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179544622 (Comments: 2) | Burgzauber (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179549355 commented 2026-03-17 05:33:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 170999393 (Comments: 4) | ATownBike (Discussed changesets: 13) | ah. I added new imagery if you want to use it. commented 2026-03-17 05:22:15 UTC by Natfoot ♦106 |
| 179922580 (Comments: 1) | Panorama_Caruaru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 179979039 commented 2026-03-17 05:15:13 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 173625388 (Comments: 9) | Endres Pelka (Discussed changesets: 55) | I było ustalone, że granic parafii nie "podczepiamy" do innych granic commented 2026-03-17 05:13:36 UTC by WieKo68 ♦174 |
| 179885648 (Comments: 1) | NeutralDisposition (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179981597 commented 2026-03-17 05:13:16 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| X | 179865376 (Comments: 2) | coatix (Discussed changesets: 4) | ok! :) commented 2026-03-17 05:12:49 UTC by coatix ♦40 |
| 179750926 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi fortera_au, Thank you for providing the feedback. I have made the corrections and removed the curve in the connecting road segment. commented 2026-03-17 04:57:04 UTC by Ky_AT ♦18 |
| 179761311 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi fortera_au, Thanks for this feedback and the reminder. I will take extra caution against outdated/old imagery sources. Changeset reverted to its previous state. commented 2026-03-17 04:40:03 UTC by Ky_AT ♦18 |
| 179967099 (Comments: 1) | ash3212 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12526374426, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8493184200 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move t... commented 2026-03-17 04:24:19 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179972718 (Comments: 1) | PeteyDC (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11363188673, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2937924554 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move t... commented 2026-03-17 04:22:15 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179797481 (Comments: 2) | SouthWestTrains1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I've cleaned up all the buildings here, including removing the tags that were incorrectly copied from existing buildings, namely ref:GB:uprn= , addr:postcode= & addr:street= . commented 2026-03-17 04:22:00 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
| 179976786 (Comments: 1) | Jarvis11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/409892940 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted. commented 2026-03-17 04:20:08 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179978849 (Comments: 1) | Carlos Franco (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9026306734 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-17 04:19:32 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179978455 (Comments: 1) | msejdr (Discussed changesets: 2) | The segment with culverts are not likely to follow the stream geometry, and are usually just that part going under a road. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179978455 ... commented 2026-03-17 04:15:53 UTC by GOwin ♦867 |
| 179978413 (Comments: 1) | msejdr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks good! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179978413 commented 2026-03-17 04:13:36 UTC by GOwin ♦867 |
| 179921700 (Comments: 3) | IsStatenIsland (Discussed changesets: 13) | I'm not questioning your sources. And I know that prefix tag is in some use, but I'm generally against about mapping features before they physically exist. My concern is that if the tags aren't updated later, we're left with in... commented 2026-03-17 04:11:12 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,524 |
| 179952701 (Comments: 1) | SouthWestTrains1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, please take more care when tracing buildings. Some things that you can do to improve: - don't add 'House' in the name field, this is incorrect. - use 'Q' to square buildings. They will look better and be more accur... commented 2026-03-17 04:07:35 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
| 179922644 (Comments: 1) | Hola Yukan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179979343 commented 2026-03-17 04:04:12 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 178389048 (Comments: 2) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi GinaroZ, I checked with recent TomTom internal GPS traces and the data supports that the route is carrying traffic from B9993 to A9. Please let me know if it’s not the case if you are from the area, since I cannot verify with images.<... commented 2026-03-17 04:03:29 UTC by Gorger ♦42 |
| 173912155 (Comments: 2) | Sebasawk (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi pwbriggs, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-03-17 03:56:03 UTC by Sebasawk ♦18 |
| 136674814 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 362) | Landuse=construction definitie van 3 jaar terug nog actueel of kan deze weg A67-A67 ? commented 2026-03-17 03:41:07 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦48 |
| 179909320 (Comments: 1) | L28F422 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Revert of 179909230 commented 2026-03-17 03:40:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179978344 (Comments: 1) | nayarasilva (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-17 03:03:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179104012 (Comments: 1) | Windsor Essex Strong Towns (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, I saw your note on the Lower Peninsula relation. I'm not sure what the issue is, the Lower Peninsula is a distinct named geographic feature that people want to show on maps. There are dozens of natural=peninsula features of similar siz... commented 2026-03-17 02:34:37 UTC by quincylvania ♦86 |
| 179974944 (Comments: 1) | lncvyz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Various changes around Bell Boulevard: - Added more information to 18-25 212th Street, which houses PS 169 and Bell Academy - Added Bell Academy point alongside PS 169 - Adjusted outlines of several buildings commented 2026-03-17 01:59:03 UTC by lncvyz ♦2 |
| 179976969 (Comments: 1) | Fa_bio (Discussed changesets: 1) | como faço pra baixar isso? commented 2026-03-17 01:57:03 UTC by Fa_bio ♦1 |
| 179923702 (Comments: 1) | molinamos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179923702 commented 2026-03-17 01:51:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 179923606 (Comments: 1) | molinamos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179923606 commented 2026-03-17 01:50:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 156078849 (Comments: 3) | UW Maddie (Discussed changesets: 41) | Thank you for the response, explanation, and fixes! commented 2026-03-17 01:31:31 UTC by Cookie Guru ♦13 |
| 179954368 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Der Name des Weges ist also "Hainbuchenallee (historischer Wegename)"? commented 2026-03-17 01:19:52 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 179846415 (Comments: 1) | mircozorzo (Discussed changesets: 61) | Was there a way for this change to have been split into several localized changes so that it does not span the whole globe? commented 2026-03-17 01:16:16 UTC by NG218 ♦9 |
| 179952311 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Der Name des Weges ist also "Eichenweg (historischer Wegename)"? commented 2026-03-17 01:12:19 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 179510339 (Comments: 1) | Jeremy T Blake (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486374280 et al Thanks for helping map golf courses. There are some problems with your edits however and your mapping process needs to be fixed going forward so you don't continue to step on the effo... commented 2026-03-17 00:20:11 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179737095 (Comments: 1) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | You appear to be tagging "Hills Hoist" washing lines as carpet hangers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179737095 commented 2026-03-17 00:14:36 UTC by ralley ♦639 |
| 178325920 (Comments: 4) | Silvoney Constancio (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá Caros Colegas, Acabei notando também e não tem como não notar, pois o CEP não deve ir junto com o nome da rua. Cada um tem o seu campo. Na tag name=* deve ir o nome e na tag postal_code=* deve ir o... commented 2026-03-17 00:14:32 UTC by santamariense ♦847 |
| 175789078 (Comments: 3) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 248) | Ik had dat zelfs aangeven in de voorgaande change #161973549 dat deze weg een fietspad geworden is, en je veranderd het zo weer terug commented 2026-03-17 00:12:10 UTC by Rubenke ♦50 |
| 179914617 (Comments: 1) | Samreddy (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset appears to just be fantasy mapping/vandalism --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179914617 commented 2026-03-17 00:00:53 UTC by ralley ♦639 |
| 179886909 (Comments: 1) | BlakeQin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not add a generic name to every object, the name field is for proper names only --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179886909 commented 2026-03-16 23:39:33 UTC by ralley ♦639 |
| 179858240 (Comments: 2) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Additionally you created a park where one already was mapped an used the incorrect generic name "Park" --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179858240 |
| 179886519 (Comments: 2) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | You have also changed a bus stop to a cafe, leaving some of the bus stop tags amongst other errors. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179886519 commented 2026-03-16 23:21:45 UTC by ralley ♦639 |
 | 179924000 (Comments: 2) | Wilfred Jones (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Topius for the correction. commented 2026-03-16 23:14:18 UTC by Wilfred Jones ♦1 |
| 177997640 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179972936 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 23:01:57 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179835798 (Comments: 2) | Ross Ortiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | are two sucursal commented 2026-03-16 22:56:46 UTC by Ross Ortiz ♦1 |
| 179718457 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20306278/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20306277/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20306276/history commented 2026-03-16 22:44:53 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 179718168 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20306231/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20306230/history commented 2026-03-16 22:44:09 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 179898826 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | Einfach die Flächen normal eintragen, ohne Multipolygon commented 2026-03-16 22:42:57 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 168188636 (Comments: 1) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 393) | Ang. punktet: Art by Me Aarhus (12956610506): Det ser ud til, at du tagger alle sådanne gør-det-selv-keramikbutikker som 'leisure=ceramics_painting'. Er en tagging som generelt anbefales til denne slags steder, eller er det blo... commented 2026-03-16 22:27:47 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦121 |
| 179973364 (Comments: 1) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 15) | A vonalak megállói egyelőre nem pontosak, ezt később javítom. commented 2026-03-16 22:06:08 UTC by qstep ♦67 |
| 179972365 (Comments: 2) | NE2 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Good catch. Yes, they should, and I will fix it. commented 2026-03-16 22:01:43 UTC by NE2 ♦3 |
| 178018274 (Comments: 2) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179972936 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 21:50:40 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179877646 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179973000. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-16 21:50:39 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179972809 (Comments: 1) | 500384736 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 21:45:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179585990 (Comments: 1) | Kramer24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Kramer24, der Weg 1486867798 (an der Reithalle) hat noch keine Eigenschaften bekommen, würden Sie das bitte prüfen und ergänzen? LG BlackyP8 commented 2026-03-16 21:35:44 UTC by BlackyP8 ♦29 |
| 179950238 (Comments: 4) | BrummsLee (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ah, danke für deine Rückmeldung! Puh, da bin ich jetzt aber froh, daß meine Bearbeitung nicht komplett falsch war. Danke für die Ergänzungen! Einen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=circular hatte i... commented 2026-03-16 21:32:10 UTC by BrummsLee ♦41 |
| 166631642 (Comments: 2) | gebux (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi GanKonMalade, I entered the paths on 22.5.2025. Two days earlier, on the 20.5.2025 the 'Office de Tourisme la Palud-sur-Verdon' deleted a bunch of paths&tracks, which were restored on 9.6.2025 by https://www.openstreetmap.org/c... commented 2026-03-16 21:26:40 UTC by gebux ♦88 |
| 134853736 (Comments: 3) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 432) | it was confusing me xo thanks for answering and fixing it! i admire your contributions with awe i can learn a lot of you! I try to improve natural areas like the LIFE nature projects or other EU-funded stuff commented 2026-03-16 21:11:26 UTC by Joske1020 ♦36 |
| 100558798 (Comments: 3) | r00tcz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Supr, děkuji za odpověď, občas lidi fakt používaj těžké hodnoty sac_scale příliš liberálně.. > davat sac_scale=strolling/hiking na tyhle obycejne cesty Prazskou zeleni je jako davat lit=no na pes... commented 2026-03-16 21:09:22 UTC by BestestGuy ♦8 |
| X | 179904962 (Comments: 2) | supsup (Discussed changesets: 11) | yeah, I was actually not aware of the JOSM function "Upload selection" until now, will use it for similar things from now on. commented 2026-03-16 21:03:10 UTC by supsup ♦15 |
| 179251511 (Comments: 1) | سامي ايت علي ولحسن (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, only use wood for dense thickets. for a school, it's more accurate to tag individual trees (natural=tree) Happy mapping! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179251... commented 2026-03-16 21:01:23 UTC by VLD0251 ♦46 |
| 176016627 (Comments: 3) | SamuraiArmada (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for the feedback JezCrow! I'll take your advice into consideration! commented 2026-03-16 20:54:03 UTC by SamuraiArmada ♦4 |
| 179915588 (Comments: 2) | GenGap (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello, ich sehe es hier so, dass der Zaun einzig und allein dafür da ist, das Rückhaltebecken einzuzäunen. Ist für mich ein Objekt. Aber verstehe auch, warum 2 getrennte Objekte sinnvoller sein können. Gibt aber auch n... commented 2026-03-16 20:50:28 UTC by GenGap ♦10 |
| 179302713 (Comments: 1) | marek kleciak (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi marek kleciak, Thank you for making alignments to the area. I noticed you added in trunk ways around Tribhuvan Rajpath that previously had construction tags and this appears to be under construction in Esri World Imagery. I was wondering if you... commented 2026-03-16 20:50:13 UTC by aaronq227 ♦30 |
| 179954255 (Comments: 6) | betelgeza1971 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ilość błędów w tej edycji mnie powala commented 2026-03-16 20:47:04 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 178211645 (Comments: 1) | mapeandobr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá mapeandobr, Notei que adicionaste "Rotatória" como nome de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474901556/history Na verdade, se não tem nome próprio, deve-se deixar em branco. Seria o mesmo qu... commented 2026-03-16 20:46:16 UTC by santamariense ♦847 |
| 179916564 (Comments: 2) | GenGap (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, place=locality passt hier eher nicht. Ist schon wirklich die Kreuzung, die so heißt. Aber loc_name ist hier passender, danke. LG :) commented 2026-03-16 20:44:57 UTC by GenGap ♦10 |
| 178045319 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179970801 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 20:40:30 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178050896 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179970730 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 20:37:14 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178097677 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179970530 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 20:35:01 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178114039 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179970117 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 20:26:54 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179953899 (Comments: 1) | betelgeza1971 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Proszę o nierobienie zmian "w cały świat" i o niepsucie mapy commented 2026-03-16 20:26:26 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179918258 (Comments: 1) | Johnnyyy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin, hast du bitte mal eine Quellenangabe für diese Änderung? Grüße silversurfer83 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179918258 ... commented 2026-03-16 20:25:20 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 179879198 (Comments: 2) | Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (Discussed changesets: 24) | można dodawać name;de do gmin co mają niemiecką nazwę commented 2026-03-16 20:24:28 UTC by xdddddddxdxdxd ♦25 |
| 179945094 (Comments: 1) | lat2001 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi :) schau dir bitte dieses Objekt noch einmal an: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489432670 Grüße silversurfer83 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... commented 2026-03-16 20:22:51 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 179970010 (Comments: 1) | xhriswaltontexas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 20:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179954081 (Comments: 3) | betelgeza1971 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-03-16 20:18:08 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179952926 (Comments: 1) | etgg (Discussed changesets: 25) | Heya, areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489465296 look like meadow, rather than cropland, so should probably be tagged as landuse=meadow meadow=pasture (you can see animals grazing on this area in aerial imagery). See https://wiki.... commented 2026-03-16 20:16:54 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,019 |
| 178185660 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179969672 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 20:09:36 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178189234 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179969354 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 20:06:30 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179962804 (Comments: 1) | Lgnap (Discussed changesets: 1) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11987311699 Please be careful not to add information that already exists. I checked with my local copy of Organic Maps: this motorcycle shop was visible. commented 2026-03-16 20:05:04 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 179957403 (Comments: 3) | De Pepernoot (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2026-03-16 20:03:10 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179864866 (Comments: 1) | Coup2boule (Discussed changesets: 2) | rue de theplug???? commented 2026-03-16 20:00:23 UTC by ilias_ ♦417 |
| 179865073 (Comments: 1) | Coup2boule (Discussed changesets: 2) | what's nf en y? commented 2026-03-16 20:00:03 UTC by ilias_ ♦417 |
| 179964128 (Comments: 1) | AryanSharma342342 (Discussed changesets: 1) | please separate changes in north korea and those in algeria commented 2026-03-16 19:59:03 UTC by ilias_ ♦417 |
| 179894059 (Comments: 3) | cpa8 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Salut, c'est pas déconnant, la doc du tag building=residential indique qu'il faut privilégier des attributs plus précis si possible. La doc du tag building=apartments indique que des commerces peuvent être pr&e... commented 2026-03-16 19:53:21 UTC by cpa8 ♦11 |
| 179965964 (Comments: 1) | raviczanin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestawy zmian należy opisywać - zgodnie z zasadami: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-16 19:52:40 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦831 |
| 179966026 (Comments: 1) | direx (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-03-16 19:52:06 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦831 |
| 178225780 (Comments: 3) | Black_Dragon1701 (Discussed changesets: 1) | O.k sorry, dann stelle ich deine version wieder her. commented 2026-03-16 19:51:30 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 179954214 (Comments: 2) | betelgeza1971 (Discussed changesets: 4) | por https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179954255 commented 2026-03-16 19:50:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,621 |
| 179920326 (Comments: 6) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 48) | Przejrzałem wszystkie swoje edycje, dorysowałem area we właściwej geometrii tam gdzie wg aktualnego orto rzeczywiście są znajdują. commented 2026-03-16 19:47:03 UTC by uprkos ♦90 |
| 179651254 (Comments: 1) | ottwiz (Discussed changesets: 289) | There was no on-site survey - it's a mistake - I'm always converting task boundaries from Simple Tasking Manager as GPX files in JOSM so with highlighted color i can see the border of where I'm mapping - but it seems i forgot to remove... commented 2026-03-16 19:43:47 UTC by ottwiz ♦395 |
| 179919099 (Comments: 1) | NasuFoito (Discussed changesets: 12) | здесь откачено много корректных адресов, по улицам :) commented 2026-03-16 19:42:25 UTC by literan ♦7,027 |
| 178200814 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179968557 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 19:40:06 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179875566 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tags for the park have since been removed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179968300. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-16 19:32:23 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179903536 (Comments: 2) | DANDO MOTORAZOS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Solamente era una prueba para ver como funcionaba en Osmand GPS. commented 2026-03-16 19:32:06 UTC by DANDO MOTORAZOS ♦2 |
| 179964992 (Comments: 1) | ANdurtzu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Alooooo!!! Ti-am mai scris si in alta editare. Nu mai folosi imaginile BING ca sunt foarte vechi si nu mai reprezinta actualitatea din teren. Nu mai desena petice de teren arabil ca nu o sa mai fie in acelasi perimetru si forma de la an la an. Se mod... commented 2026-03-16 19:22:43 UTC by rarad74 ♦441 |
| 179889024 (Comments: 2) | Jakaka2222 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ik zat er al een beetje over te twijfelen aangezien een stukje verderop zie: https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.90578,5.961907,16/?datastrip=20260307_SVNEO-03&sensorname=SuperView-NEO er wel duidelijk werkzaamheden zijn. En het land is oo... commented 2026-03-16 19:21:40 UTC by Jakaka2222 ♦11 |
| 178222416 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179967907 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 19:19:46 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178246312 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179967842 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 19:17:26 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 177734816 (Comments: 1) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Please do not create or assume names for features (e.g., “Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn”). Only add names when they can be verified from a street sign, official trail map, or municipal GIS source. If a road or track does not have a veri... commented 2026-03-16 19:16:58 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦141 |
| 179966387 (Comments: 2) | MrMark79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | fixed format openingstijden commented 2026-03-16 19:08:03 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179962985 (Comments: 1) | TearingLayer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-16 19:04:22 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 178279023 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179966788 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 18:55:08 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178304551 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179966417 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 18:43:50 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179966435 (Comments: 1) | 500384753 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 18:42:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179953788 (Comments: 1) | paddyjk19 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Why are you adding golf greens then deleting? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179953788 commented 2026-03-16 18:42:02 UTC by RushMM ♦9 |
| 179944572 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 73) | Miksi muutit parking_aislet drivewayksi? commented 2026-03-16 18:35:05 UTC by TuomoSe ♦2 |
| 160440885 (Comments: 3) | Hanys1871 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Edycję zrobił Vbeno ponad rok temu. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159995523 A tę dziwną sytuację zauważył wspomniany przez Ciebie mapujący Hanys1871 i zadał to pytanie. Ale jak najbardziej, przy kolejnej edycji obszaru... commented 2026-03-16 18:34:13 UTC by Stone_X ♦19 |
| 178315735 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179966200 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 18:34:10 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178716314 (Comments: 3) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Der erste Kommentar war richtig! commented 2026-03-16 18:32:21 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178324737 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179965592 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 18:31:28 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178325786 (Comments: 3) | rusjanis (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ēkas nav, bet ortofoto redzamas - tās kāds var atkal iezīmēt, ja atstāt kartē tukšu vietu. Daudz vietās tā pa jaunu tiek sazīmētas nojauktas ēkas, ceļi un viss kas. Žogs ir gar ietvi, bet tikai līdz dienvidu sienai. Mapil... commented 2026-03-16 18:08:33 UTC by HellMap ♦847 |
| 179964158 (Comments: 1) | unknown246 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Changeset 178160938 was reverted. Ignore above comment. commented 2026-03-16 17:51:38 UTC by unknown246 ♦11 |
| 179461786 (Comments: 7) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 117) | Of course the sensible way to represent pavements is simply to (correctly) apply the sidewalk tag to the highways that they are part of. commented 2026-03-16 17:50:40 UTC by Pete Owens ♦77 |
| 179920121 (Comments: 1) | IVRInovação (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you explain what you tried to map here? All these ways have many foreign tags and no common ones. commented 2026-03-16 17:48:05 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179958572 (Comments: 1) | Ekrenz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Make sure to square your buildings. If you use iD-Editor, you can do that by pressing Q. It saves a lot of avoidable work commented 2026-03-16 17:46:57 UTC by genityves ♦4 |
| 178160938 (Comments: 2) | unknown246 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted. commented 2026-03-16 17:45:34 UTC by unknown246 ♦11 |
| 179963751 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 141) | + mikromapowanie garaży Budynki są źle zmapowane - pełno dziwnych ścieżek przechodzących przez budynki. Do oddzielnej weryfikacji. commented 2026-03-16 17:36:33 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦388 |
| 179963530 (Comments: 1) | Saint Arnold Brewing Company (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 17:33:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179947703 (Comments: 2) | LakshmySudeep (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-16 17:33:13 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179539830 (Comments: 2) | AdamVista (Discussed changesets: 4) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179582051 https://osm.org/changeset/179584132 commented 2026-03-16 17:33:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179541697 (Comments: 2) | Bacchus Holiday Homes (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179543061 commented 2026-03-16 17:33:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179542202 (Comments: 2) | Bacchus Holiday Homes (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179543061 commented 2026-03-16 17:33:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179531267 (Comments: 2) | Check Umzug (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179533849 commented 2026-03-16 17:33:03 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179528693 (Comments: 2) | Super Media Advertising & Packaging Company (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179963682 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-16 17:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 175250819 (Comments: 3) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | erledigt commented 2026-03-16 17:32:22 UTC by Stefano_1973 ♦14 |
| 179758209 (Comments: 1) | Ian ghosty Curnow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Make sure to square your buildings when mapping new ones. If you use iD-Editor, you can do that by pressing Q while selecting the building. commented 2026-03-16 17:30:31 UTC by genityves ♦4 |
| 179960422 (Comments: 1) | müllers (Discussed changesets: 43) | Und wo genau wurden hier jetzt "Kontaktdaten ergänzt"?! Bitte sachlich und treffende Beschreibung des Changesets wählen ;-) commented 2026-03-16 17:28:23 UTC by Harald Hartmann ♦835 |
| 179209217 (Comments: 2) | DerSchmopf (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for letting me know, it's fixed now. commented 2026-03-16 17:27:23 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦5 |
| 179875903 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 211) | The correct tag for any sort of community within a larger community would be neighborhood, quarter, or suburb. "Community" is also a very vague word and thus would not make a good tag in OSM. You could essentially say that it already does e... commented 2026-03-16 17:25:09 UTC by Joseph R P ♦414 |
| 179963117 (Comments: 1) | Che Damian Hardy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 17:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178330924 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179962439 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 17:17:01 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179870738 (Comments: 3) | Railwayfan2005 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Indeed, the OSM editor does suggest changing the tags — but it’s only a suggestion. If the tag change could always be applied with certainty then it would have been applied automatically without you having to approve it. Please do check s... commented 2026-03-16 17:15:11 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,019 |
| 179961392 (Comments: 3) | pro optik Würselen (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for the notice. I have revised the description to a neutral wording. commented 2026-03-16 17:10:50 UTC by pro optik Würselen ♦1 |
| 179956366 (Comments: 2) | roro-t (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nein, das ist 28805. Der ist im Grünstreifen und hat inzwischen auch einen Namen. 28808 ist ist dem Bürgersteig, fast an der Fahrspur. commented 2026-03-16 17:08:48 UTC by roro-t ♦5 |
| 179877434 (Comments: 2) | NorthYorkshire (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks! A long but rewarding process when the map starts to look nice and green. commented 2026-03-16 17:08:04 UTC by NorthYorkshire ♦4 |
| 179905298 (Comments: 4) | szkwok (Discussed changesets: 3) | 2. You broke a `=service` road. Just avoid connecting them. commented 2026-03-16 17:04:15 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,806 |
| 179890196 (Comments: 1) | Meggapott (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Meggapott, ich habe hier deine Änderung an der Höchstgeschwindigkeit der Apfelstraße gesehen und habe eine Anmerkung dazu. Die Höchstgeschwindigkeit 30 gilt dort nur für bestimmte ausgeschilderte Zeiträume.<... commented 2026-03-16 16:57:20 UTC by Muhmaker ♦138 |
| 124881194 (Comments: 2) | peedy-fit (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ja, tatsächlich. Habe ich da tatsächlich eine er 7000 Eichen in den Wald verschoben? Das tut mir Leid. Kannst du es korrigieren? Ich kenne mich mit OSM nur solala aus. Vielen Dank. commented 2026-03-16 16:51:37 UTC by peedy-fit ♦1 |
| 176761888 (Comments: 7) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 168) | Despite this, I feel like physical construction is still an important part of road classification. Route 210 & Alvernon feature several grade separated interchanges in my opinion. commented 2026-03-16 16:51:14 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦149 |
| 179961415 (Comments: 1) | 500382905 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:48:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179961013 (Comments: 1) | 500365933 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:42:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 113148333 (Comments: 4) | xrt (Discussed changesets: 58) | Merci surtout "grâce" à un import d'arbres en Bolivie dont les valeurs en cm se sont retrouvées sans conversion en m, d'où des vérifications de valeurs a priori suspectes. commented 2026-03-16 16:40:17 UTC by trial ♦1,132 |
| 179958582 (Comments: 1) | R0m0l (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dag R0m0l name Wibra verwijderd op het oude adres. Klopt brand Etos nog wel bij de nieuwe wibra? MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 16:35:12 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 178588127 (Comments: 2) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 80) | Szkoda, ze na discorda nie pisałes, to czysty przypadek, że patrze tak daleko w historie xD Coś jest nie tak, czyli błąd ręcznego mergowania danych. Jak to zawsze bywa, nie zawsze się udaje jak trzeba. commented 2026-03-16 16:33:43 UTC by Yog Sot ♦441 |
| 179913009 (Comments: 1) | ItaliA1delSole (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ciao ItaliA1delSole, vedo che fai modifiche in tutta Italia quindi immagino tu non abbia visitato personalmente i luoghi, posso chiederti che fonti utilizzi per le tue modifiche? commented 2026-03-16 16:32:21 UTC by totera ♦334 |
| 179960345 (Comments: 1) | 500380512 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179960053 (Comments: 1) | 500383542 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:21:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179959852 (Comments: 1) | CarrTech: Smart Autobody Solutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:18:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179959602 (Comments: 1) | Baum’s Boots & More (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179760441 (Comments: 2) | ChamblyCanal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Dimitar155. I appreciate your explanation for the reversion of my edit. Thanks and happy mapping! commented 2026-03-16 16:15:26 UTC by ChamblyCanal ♦1 |
| 179699859 (Comments: 3) | Duški Kubov (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ok, to beriem, ja som siel len podla toho "paved". :) Ak tie podvaly netvoria suvisly povrch ale su medzi nimi medzery, mozno by stalo za to zvazit surface=stepping_stones. Ak suvisle su, tak surface=concrete. "paved"... commented 2026-03-16 16:11:30 UTC by ticho2 ♦34 |
| 177378443 (Comments: 2) | halibutwig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, La borne dispose d'une prise électrique du même type que celles qu'on trouve dans les logements. On peut donc y charger un vélo électrique, même si ce n'est pas prévu pour, non ? commented 2026-03-16 16:10:28 UTC by halibutwig ♦1 |
| 179926076 (Comments: 4) | thriswallors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unfortunately there are many remaining trails that I suspect don't exist, as well as some buildings that certainly don't exist. However, I haven't verified on the ground, so I'm reluctant to remove them. commented 2026-03-16 16:10:06 UTC by thriswallors ♦1 |
| 179931848 (Comments: 1) | chuson805 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bạn chưa biết tên thì đừng đặt là "Trường học 1", "Trường học 2" nhé commented 2026-03-16 16:01:11 UTC by Vmosnokia31 ♦7 |
| 163678057 (Comments: 1) | Ducminhduongcb (Discussed changesets: 6) | First edit ever!!! commented 2026-03-16 15:57:17 UTC by Ducminhduongcb ♦5 |
| 179927372 (Comments: 2) | chuson805 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Các tòa Singapore School bạn phải ghi là "Tòa 1", "Tòa 2" v.v. ĐỪNG ghi "Singapore school 2", tránh lặp lại với Khuôn viên trường/School ground. commented 2026-03-16 15:55:07 UTC by Vmosnokia31 ♦7 |
| 179911021 (Comments: 2) | ydrgbjo (Discussed changesets: 29) | ... und vielleicht könntest du ja auch mal versuchen, etwas aussagekräftigere Änderungssatzkommentare nieder zu schreiben ... commented 2026-03-16 15:51:33 UTC by UT93 ♦89 |
| 179958439 (Comments: 1) | hauke-stieler (Discussed changesets: 43) | Siehe auch changeset/172053426 commented 2026-03-16 15:46:57 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦328 |
| 179958329 (Comments: 1) | hauke-stieler (Discussed changesets: 43) | Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172053426 commented 2026-03-16 15:45:43 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦328 |
| 172053426 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 52) | FYI: Da ich keine Antwort erhalten habe, habe ich die Änderungen zurückgedreht. Siehe Kommentar oben und Verlinkte Karten auf https://www.hamburg.de/freizeit/ausfluege/wandern/wandern-fischbeker-heide-306580 commented 2026-03-16 15:45:30 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦328 |
| 179922656 (Comments: 1) | CalvinLewis26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM! The outline of the building should show where the base of the building is. This is more difficult when the aerial imagery shows the imagery at an angle, because you'll end up with a much larger footprint th... commented 2026-03-16 15:42:57 UTC by jm428 ♦41 |
| 179957741 (Comments: 1) | Kate's Hallmark Shop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 15:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179948865 (Comments: 1) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 145) | CS Korrektur: NSG "Waldseenbereich Theresia" Tagging ergänzt. commented 2026-03-16 15:36:39 UTC by surveyor54 ♦671 |
| 179949005 (Comments: 3) | Remco21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voorlopig aan gepast naar highway=residential Mocht er een G13, 12a of 11 staan laat het dan even weten. Het fietspad naar woning nr 121 heb ik omgezet naar driveway MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 15:35:01 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179957547 (Comments: 1) | Weber Sports (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 15:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178130008 (Comments: 3) | PStieler (Discussed changesets: 17) | Please also note that many paths are marked as surface 'unpaved or earth.' Nevertheless, these are paths connected to the buildings, so accordingly they are of higher quality than tracks. commented 2026-03-16 15:33:30 UTC by PStieler ♦6 |
| 167838774 (Comments: 1) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 40) | Z jakiego powodu została stworzona ścieżka 724570405 skoro nigdzie nie prowadzi? commented 2026-03-16 15:28:03 UTC by Gucio10 ♦4 |
| 179934325 (Comments: 1) | chuson805 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👋Chào bạn, bạn phải ghi Số nhà ở vào phần Address, không ghi địa chỉ tòa vào Tên/Name. Số tầng phải ghi vào Levels, không ghi vào Name. Bạn không n&e... commented 2026-03-16 15:27:01 UTC by Vmosnokia31 ♦7 |
| 179947150 (Comments: 1) | BarryTech (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-16 15:26:54 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179956987 (Comments: 1) | Electric11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 15:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179956947 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 4) | @maxi_ hier ist auch ein rotes M auf dem Hydrantenschild commented 2026-03-16 15:17:13 UTC by qkaz ♦9 |
| 179944301 (Comments: 4) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 162) | Thank you a lot. commented 2026-03-16 15:15:59 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦240 |
| 178095871 (Comments: 1) | Heo Tham An (Discussed changesets: 6) | Heya! The road is completely closed for construction? If its being reconstructed / upgraded but is passable still, then it should be tagged as construction=minor https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:construction%3Dminor highway=constr... commented 2026-03-16 15:10:38 UTC by dottir34 ♦7 |
| 179956363 (Comments: 1) | GLOW Medspa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 15:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179956022 (Comments: 1) | ThePlatinumPavilion (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 15:00:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179644644 (Comments: 2) | davidapc00 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Estimado. Editar este tipo de cosas es muy complejo. Como le indicamos en el mail de Bienvenida, puede unirse al chat de la comunidad para discutir cómo hacer este tipo de cosas, varios maperos le ayudarán Si tiene problemas con algo... commented 2026-03-16 14:57:44 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179955895 (Comments: 1) | 500382959 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 14:57:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
 | 179925100 (Comments: 3) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 79) | Thanks for the reply @iandees Best regards, Pascal commented 2026-03-16 14:51:10 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179937233 (Comments: 3) | Ebersried (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Dankeschön commented 2026-03-16 14:48:46 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179910410 (Comments: 2) | StarWagon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, thank you Max, that is definitely a better tag Cheers commented 2026-03-16 14:47:49 UTC by StarWagon ♦2 |
| 179911939 (Comments: 3) | Клініка Лілу (Discussed changesets: 1) | @ajmat Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179937052 would be ve... commented 2026-03-16 14:47:17 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179903178 (Comments: 3) | ptaff (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oh I see, thanks for the info! commented 2026-03-16 14:43:54 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦469 |
| 179952370 (Comments: 1) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ik heb wat syntaxfouten in de openingstijden opgelost, vooral de ';' miste tussen de verschillende tijden. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179955153 commented 2026-03-16 14:39:30 UTC by Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier ♦4 |
| 150970210 (Comments: 1) | okuk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ikke sikker på jeg fik gjort det her korrekt. Ændringen må gerne fjernes commented 2026-03-16 14:34:17 UTC by okuk ♦2 |
| 150950548 (Comments: 1) | okuk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ikke sikker på jeg fik gjort det her korrekt. Ændringen må gerne fjernes commented 2026-03-16 14:34:11 UTC by okuk ♦2 |
| 100339208 (Comments: 2) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 432) | Hi ivanbranco Followed your suggestion and applied the species: prefix. Oddly with the recently added wikidata/pedia JOSM plugin it jumped me to Q721 which has the comment that the tag is a zoo, At any rate the plant if entering in the brow... commented 2026-03-16 14:32:14 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,479 |
| 179899511 (Comments: 1) | GeneHunt (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335264565/ There are some landuse and buildings objects here that are double-mapped. commented 2026-03-16 14:28:49 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 179496423 (Comments: 2) | Alex_Hells (Discussed changesets: 1) | по п.1 - прошу прощения, видимо не до конца разобрался с функционалом. по п.2 поставил для перестраховки, адресация идет по микрорайону commented 2026-03-16 14:22:39 UTC by Alex_Hells ♦1 |
| 179908475 (Comments: 2) | Niederpruem (Discussed changesets: 43) | Stand: 16.3.2026, das Haus steht komplett leer. Kein Hotel Poock und kein Restaurant Toto mehr. Ist aber mal früher dort gewesen. Wenn Ihr das in der History haben wollt, dann könnt ihr das gerne so eingeben. commented 2026-03-16 14:22:03 UTC by Niederpruem ♦36 |
| 179865438 (Comments: 4) | markalex- (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted and retagged as disused at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179954275 commented 2026-03-16 14:20:19 UTC by markalex- ♦21 |
| 179954051 (Comments: 1) | Capla Automotive Protection Lab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 14:18:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179521593 (Comments: 6) | Tomek Bogusz (Discussed changesets: 2) | tak commented 2026-03-16 14:17:16 UTC by Tomek Bogusz ♦1 |
| 179849053 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 73) | The segments that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179954121 commented 2026-03-16 14:16:27 UTC by TinPetreković ♦274 |
| 179923876 (Comments: 3) | davidapc00 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Y otro tema. UNa cosa es la estación y otra es la entrada a la Estación. Ahora lo que acaba de hacer es duplicar la está ción Santa Ana. Voy a corregir eso. Gracias --- Publish... commented 2026-03-16 14:14:03 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179062575 (Comments: 1) | UrbanUnPlanner (Discussed changesets: 20) | Nodes 92310197, 13599781835 and 13599779741 have yes' as value for lit, might that be a typo? commented 2026-03-16 14:08:41 UTC by Kees 59 ♦66 |
| 174786359 (Comments: 1) | Esraa Almamoon Mohammed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Despite this task being mapped 4 months ago, I want to react to your mappings. Often you map a yard as a building. And clustered buildings, Walled objects, without a roof are not to be mapped as a building. <... commented 2026-03-16 14:07:26 UTC by Frans S ♦10,523 |
| 178977030 (Comments: 2) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 204) | Hi, ich bin eher an den Grenzen bis admin_level=8 dran. 9+10 mache ich nur teilweise.... Du kannst gern ergänzen oder auch meine Änderungen verbessern/korrigieren. VG commented 2026-03-16 13:52:23 UTC by Ropino ♦410 |
| 179594343 (Comments: 2) | Mike Steglich (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Langläufer, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Es handelt sich tatsächlich um die ganz normalen Wege im Zoo. Ich werde die Wege - wie von Dir vorgeschlagen - in den nächsten Tagen ändern. Beste Grüße... commented 2026-03-16 13:52:22 UTC by Mike Steglich ♦2 |
| 179938117 (Comments: 2) | germini313 (Discussed changesets: 3) | OK, don’t bother, we have Mapillary picture of this area and it looks like a café. We moved it to its correct location and added the door. commented 2026-03-16 13:44:15 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 179952487 (Comments: 1) | B252697 (Discussed changesets: 35) | I walked past just a few days ago over the last weekend and saw the footpaths which I noticed was not displayed on OSM commented 2026-03-16 13:40:04 UTC by B252697 ♦43 |
| 179951355 (Comments: 1) | Skya Somalia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 13:12:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179949759 (Comments: 1) | Panlosos (Discussed changesets: 6) | Cześć, jesteś pewny że pas rowerowy dociera aż w okolice posesji 26? Jest to pas dwukierunkowy? Jakie właściwie jest tam oznakowanie pionowe? commented 2026-03-16 13:12:07 UTC by stasiu512 ♦272 |
| 152649178 (Comments: 2) | LateNightTone (Discussed changesets: 43) | If you're looking at this on demo.fmap.com, there are various rendering issues with how multiple building:parts interact, it's quite unpredictable - in the end I gave up as the figures in the tags should be about right, but the renderer mak... commented 2026-03-16 13:10:54 UTC by LateNightTone ♦69 |
| 179821081 (Comments: 3) | sa62 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Коригирах го и добавих шаблон за този бранд шкаафове. Надявам се скоро да се появи в редактора. commented 2026-03-16 13:04:44 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦838 |
| 179944303 (Comments: 1) | MüBri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to osm, Please have a look here.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:defibrillator:location?uselang=nl For the right location use Dutch or English. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-03-16 13:00:52 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179950697 (Comments: 1) | bigbullyturfut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 12:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179920233 (Comments: 1) | Msaib (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello. We are really trying to help you, but we do need you to respond and engage the local community. For various versions you treated the silos like squares, then i took the time to round them and make it right. Now you delete everything and add th... commented 2026-03-16 12:56:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179295678 (Comments: 2) | TAMTAM17 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Guido, Yes, of course, I’ll try my best to restore it all. Before my modifications, there were already quite a few errors, maybe they are related as well. Thanks for the feedback in any case :) commented 2026-03-16 12:53:40 UTC by TAMTAM17 ♦1 |
| 179921129 (Comments: 1) | rhevia (Discussed changesets: 11) | reemplazado por nodo antiguo, reubicado y con nuevos tags. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179921129 commented 2026-03-16 12:47:50 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179921181 (Comments: 1) | rhevia (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola. Por favor no borrar elementos a los que haya que hacerles correcciones y luego agregarlos en otra edición. Se puden modificar y así no se pierde el historial. Por favor no incurrir en esa práctica. saludos ... commented 2026-03-16 12:46:11 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179921520 (Comments: 1) | Msaib (Discussed changesets: 6) | Does the park pass under the silos? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179921520 commented 2026-03-16 12:44:42 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179941688 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello, reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179950060. The northern road is only for leaving the parking lot. There is no direct connection with the southern one. That is clearly visible on NRW Orthophotos. Regards commented 2026-03-16 12:44:01 UTC by aixbrick ♦894 |
| 179921720 (Comments: 1) | rhevia (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola. Por favor revisar las correcciones que te hacemos. que se ve que corregimos y luego repites lo mismo. Un loteo con un puñado de casas no es necesariamente un área residencial resún OSM. Los loteos, cuando están fuera... commented 2026-03-16 12:40:17 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179949108 (Comments: 2) | ReinderH (Discussed changesets: 8) | De weg heb ik weer losgemaakt van de landuse residential. Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alt toets te gebruiken. Relaties kun je alleen maar goed verwijderen met editor josm. Een weg eerst verwijderen maakt ook de relatie stuk. ... commented 2026-03-16 12:35:00 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179574150 (Comments: 1) | Ghazikadii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Ghazikadii, benvenut* su OSM! Dalle immagini di Bing sembra un grosso edificio a più piani, inoltre ci sono molte macchine parcheggiate intorno. Sei sicuro sia una "house" (casa indipendente che ospita una sola famiglia)?... commented 2026-03-16 12:29:24 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,864 |
| 179531317 (Comments: 10) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 136) | Socrates method. I point towards the extremes and then hopefully can deduce The Real Thing. Re "remove inside lines", supposedly routers should treat pedestrian areas as routable even when there are no foot paths inside of them, but ... commented 2026-03-16 12:28:17 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦128 |
| 179115371 (Comments: 5) | katpatuka (Discussed changesets: 124) | To my knowledge the story behind is like this: a road is upgraded under the name of a 省道(S) or 县道(X), but never make it across the county boundaries because the local gov doesn't want the road surface be ruined by through traffic (overlo... commented 2026-03-16 12:26:44 UTC by Nitori_Anna ♦1 |
| 179940157 (Comments: 1) | tiparraco2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, los bares en españa se etiquetan amenity=pub y los pubs amenity=bar, al revés de lo que sugiere la etiqueta. Puedes comprobarlo en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=bar https://wiki.openstree... commented 2026-03-16 12:26:03 UTC by kapazao ♦999 |
| 179947862 (Comments: 1) | ReinderH (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die routerelatie heb ik weer hersteld. Wanneer je routerelaties wilt bewerken dan overstappen naar editor JOSM Editor iD kan daar niet mee omgaan. editor josm stap voor stap https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voo... commented 2026-03-16 12:25:46 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179924168 (Comments: 1) | rhevia (Discussed changesets: 11) | No tiene mucha pinta de viaducto. Pasé varios de los targs al camino que pasa por ahí. El concepto de separar la vía que pasa por el puente del puente mismo es para otras cosas... Por favor incorporarse al chat de la comun... commented 2026-03-16 12:22:39 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179946488 (Comments: 2) | ReinderH (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wandelroute loopt nu via het olifantenpaadje. commented 2026-03-16 12:17:31 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179944531 (Comments: 4) | Breit S (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oh ja dort hast du Recht, da ist mir ein Fehler passiert. Wurde wieder geändert. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. VG. commented 2026-03-16 12:15:59 UTC by Breit S ♦5 |
| 179945560 (Comments: 1) | rhevia (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola. El tag building es para las estructuras. No para el recinto completo. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179945560 commented 2026-03-16 12:10:35 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 168675902 (Comments: 2) | Breit S (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Mir war nicht bewusst, dass die gleiche Benennung Name sowie Ref zu Komplikationen führen kann. Mir war wichtig die Gebäude zweifelsfrei und sofort erkennbar wie das Gebäude heisst B18 ode... commented 2026-03-16 12:07:17 UTC by Breit S ♦5 |
| 179942047 (Comments: 2) | Dennis Dee (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dank voor je tips (ook op de andere commits). Ik zal de tips ter harte nemen bij volgende wijzigingen. Dennis commented 2026-03-16 12:04:24 UTC by Dennis Dee ♦1 |
| 179943106 (Comments: 1) | Breit S (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shelter_type vermutlich besser eignen als building=shed und den Namen würde ich ebenfalls weglassen, er wird ja nicht den Eigennamen "Pavillon" tragen. commented 2026-03-16 12:03:08 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦161 |
 | 179617814 (Comments: 2) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 11) | Why did you reverted my changeset? It was already corrected. commented 2026-03-16 12:01:18 UTC by Chawagorn Toomma ♦1 |
| 179445163 (Comments: 7) | ljouglet (Discussed changesets: 3) | Parfait s’il n’y a plus d’erreur. Les cyclistes sont les grands gagnants ! Merci pour le lien, il est très bien pour visualiser l’ensemble rapidement. On me l’avait déj&agra... commented 2026-03-16 12:00:35 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦83 |
| 179438989 (Comments: 2) | Jorisbo (Discussed changesets: 206) | Hallo redd, nein, ist mit der hand gemacht. grusse Joris commented 2026-03-16 11:46:35 UTC by Jorisbo ♦160 |
| 178355125 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179947059 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 11:45:06 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179945060 (Comments: 2) | Rican1970 (Discussed changesets: 1) | De rest ook aangepast naar Frankrijkweg conform kadaster bgt https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=40242.46&geometry.y=387436.98&zoomlevel=12.21 commented 2026-03-16 11:43:51 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 178373338 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179946400 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-16 11:36:34 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179945722 (Comments: 1) | ReinderH (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Reinder, Ik heb van footway (officieel wandelpad met G7 bord) een highway=path gemaakt met informal=yes en path=desire Dan zijn de tags voor zo'n paadje. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 11:35:23 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179944389 (Comments: 2) | li_lucarini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vedo ora che è un bioparco sociale (dal sito che hai allegato all'elemento parco). Penso che non sia *anche* il nome dell'edificio, per cui lo rimuoverei. grazie ancora per le modifiche commented 2026-03-16 11:29:01 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,864 |
| 179942641 (Comments: 1) | Dennis Dee (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Dennis, Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Dit adres is volgens mij niet hier. Dit is de Siciliëboulevard. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 11:24:16 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179943230 (Comments: 1) | Dennis Dee (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oke .. , maar een adres zal dan nog gewoon bestaan. Voortaan beter alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen van een adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 11:20:02 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 178597748 (Comments: 1) | Vi2727 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please do not add access=yes to highways. It allows too many vehicles (cars, busses, snowmobiles, etc). commented 2026-03-16 11:18:02 UTC by Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦618 |
| 179943685 (Comments: 1) | Dennis Dee (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Dennis De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode. swimming_pool heb ik ook aangepast naar sports_centre. swimming_pool is een tag voor de bak met water. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 11:16:59 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179586573 (Comments: 2) | InfosReseaux (Discussed changesets: 23) | Oh no, that's phases=* I fix this, thanks for noticing commented 2026-03-16 11:10:51 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦166 |
| 176271190 (Comments: 2) | olo81 (Discussed changesets: 102) | ogarnę to commented 2026-03-16 11:08:23 UTC by C2oc4 ♦216 |
| 179751242 (Comments: 3) | Mike Steglich (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wenn das ein "öffentlicher" Weg im Zoo ist, würde ich foot=customers vorschlagen. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179751242 commented 2026-03-16 10:52:08 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,538 |
| 48773495 (Comments: 7) | rmikke (Discussed changesets: 60) | At the time of the change adding missing wikidata keys was important and there were so many of them missing that we just assumed that wikipedia keys are correct to get the job done quickly. It's not like we added much work for people correcting ... commented 2026-03-16 10:47:29 UTC by rmikke ♦114 |
| 179943744 (Comments: 1) | ANTOHH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-16 10:45:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179860682 (Comments: 1) | jj000 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Waarom voeg je allemaal voetpaden toe die eigenlijk stoepen zijn en daarom weinig tot geen meerwaarde hebben omdat ze direct aan de weg liggen ipv Use_Sidewalk toe te voegen aan de wegen? Dit is rommelig en maakt routing erg ingewikkeld. Sowieso zou ... commented 2026-03-16 10:44:55 UTC by Rubenke ♦50 |
| 179101147 (Comments: 2) | AmineAusAlbuquerque (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Hendrik, einverstanden :) Du hast mehr Erfahrung in OSM als ich. Für die Zukunft weiß ich dann bescheid Grüße zurück Amine commented 2026-03-16 10:33:15 UTC by AmineAusAlbuquerque ♦2 |
| 179914538 (Comments: 1) | MartinMis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vyzera to dobre. Este by sa mozno zislo "vyrezat" to z luky ktora je okolo, a pridat parkovisko pred cvicakom. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179... commented 2026-03-16 10:25:14 UTC by ticho2 ♦34 |
| 179916063 (Comments: 1) | armnzahid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 179942146 commented 2026-03-16 10:19:53 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 179540178 (Comments: 1) | marton_tud (Discussed changesets: 26) | Vyzera to dobre. Ako skusenemu maperovi ti to asi bolo jasne, ale zaskrtol si "review requested", takze nech sa paci. :) Este mozno pridat povrch na usek cyklocesty na moste, ale to uz je detail. --- #RE... commented 2026-03-16 10:11:14 UTC by ticho2 ♦34 |
 | 179917993 (Comments: 2) | Elixir98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 179941407 commented 2026-03-16 10:06:52 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 179938259 (Comments: 1) | germini313 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Duplicate information. Reverted. commented 2026-03-16 09:57:25 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 179938050 (Comments: 1) | germini313 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please do not add municipalities or post codes on addresses. We do not do this anymore in Belgium. The entire country is already covered with areas to compute this data automatically. OSM is and should remain a well-ordered database. Your e... commented 2026-03-16 09:56:58 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,787 |
| 179940272 (Comments: 1) | partnerinaging (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 09:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179939051 (Comments: 2) | Nozzit (Discussed changesets: 8) | Die noordelijke track klopte ook niet.. Daar heb ik horse_riding van gemaakt over het hele terrein. Wellicht kunnen de namen wel van de bakken af. Beetje overkill. CTRL-F5 voor het effect gr eggie commented 2026-03-16 09:43:03 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179888008 (Comments: 1) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset id: 179939592 commented 2026-03-16 09:42:02 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 179893892 (Comments: 1) | m0rphU (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hab es wieder entfernt. maxspeed ist hier unterschiedlich je Fahrrichtung und forward/backward ist bereits korrekt gesetzt. commented 2026-03-16 09:26:00 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,042 |
| 179891327 (Comments: 2) | victorelgueta (Discussed changesets: 16) | vale vale, es que habían unos bien mal dibujados. Pero vale lo haré así de ahora en adelante. commented 2026-03-16 09:24:49 UTC by victorelgueta ♦12 |
| 179927547 (Comments: 1) | pesec (Discussed changesets: 92) | Здравствуйте. На сколько мне известно, в Тюмени платный период в зонах платных парковок везде с 9:00 до 18:00 по будним дням (кроме круглосуто... commented 2026-03-16 09:24:37 UTC by GlobalScan ♦10 |
| 179429906 (Comments: 5) | taxi301 (Discussed changesets: 122) | Now I will pay more attention to the charging station, only recently I have a hybrid with a CCS socket commented 2026-03-16 09:22:44 UTC by taxi301 ♦91 |
| 179935708 (Comments: 3) | Nozzit (Discussed changesets: 8) | No problem... In het begin is veel abacadabra. Dan zul je steeds de wiki moeten raadplegen. commented 2026-03-16 09:14:58 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179935395 (Comments: 3) | Nozzit (Discussed changesets: 8) | Oke.. duidelijk commented 2026-03-16 09:12:22 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179933056 (Comments: 3) | rutgerkra (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ah.. dan woonexpress node ontdoen van de bedrijfsinfo en evt op de juiste adresnode bijtaggen. Die adresnodes 26 kun je samenvoegen. Editor id plakt automatisch commented 2026-03-16 09:11:17 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179934758 (Comments: 3) | Nozzit (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dat klopt. alleen nu stond de locatie over het hele terrein. Die toevoeging heb ik verwijderd. commented 2026-03-16 09:09:17 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179937723 (Comments: 1) | Nozzit (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag nozzit. Svp geen name gebruiken voor beschrijvingen. Gr eggie commented 2026-03-16 09:07:38 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179933117 (Comments: 2) | rutgerkra (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ah super, dankjewel. Zal dit in de toekomst ook doen. Bedankt! commented 2026-03-16 09:07:27 UTC by rutgerkra ♦2 |
| 179117814 (Comments: 3) | PSA Payment Services Austria GmbH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Update: Die Installation wird auf Wunsch der Gemeinde weiter nach hinten verschoben. Die Befüllung und Inbetriebnahme ist aktuell für 30.04.2026 eingeplant. commented 2026-03-16 09:03:39 UTC by PSA Payment Services Austria GmbH ♦1 |
| 179936165 (Comments: 1) | ANdurtzu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salut. Te rog NU mai folosi imaginile bing. Au peste 12 ani vechime. Foloseste ESRI standard sau Mapbox. Nu are rost sa desenezi aiurea campurile cultivate, deoarece perimetrele lor se vor modifica de la an la an si raman aiurea desenate pe harta.... commented 2026-03-16 08:50:05 UTC by rarad74 ♦441 |
| 179935714 (Comments: 1) | Kriskraskriebel (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hoi, review_requested \tyes Lijkt me allemaal ike. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 08:35:54 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179432126 (Comments: 6) | yoann_immergis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Malheureusement certaines photos ne chargent pas de notre côté :/ Est-il possible de les mettre sur l'instance OSM-FR ? L'instance IGN est plutôt dédiée aux collectivités (et les per... commented 2026-03-16 08:35:39 UTC by enzo_immergis ♦24 |
| 179756246 (Comments: 1) | Wikiscout (Discussed changesets: 7) | Servus, bitte keine Namen für solche Fußwege vergeben. Mehr Infos dazu findest du im Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name Ich passe das mal an. :) Alles gute commented 2026-03-16 08:27:13 UTC by Negreheb ♦323 |
| 179935032 (Comments: 1) | Nozzit (Discussed changesets: 8) | Alle begin is moeilijk. Voor kerdiensten gebruik je service_times https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times Dus niet openingstijden. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 08:18:58 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179934890 (Comments: 1) | Nozzit (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Nozzit. Svp geen name= gebruiken bij een beschrijving. Ik pas het aan naar description. Dit is niet de naam van het veld. MVG eggie commented 2026-03-16 08:16:57 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179819225 (Comments: 7) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 121) | Für's Gebäude ist jetzt landuse=retail gesetzt. commented 2026-03-16 08:14:52 UTC by Hb- ♦357 |
| 179856883 (Comments: 1) | Hélène Caucheteux (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM! Vous avez ajouté un magasin nommé "Magasin Japan Koi". Comme vous n'avez mis que le nom, il risque de ne pas apparaitre sur la carte, et sera manquant des applications utilisant les do... commented 2026-03-16 08:14:12 UTC by juminet ♦104 |
| 179934746 (Comments: 1) | Nozzit (Discussed changesets: 8) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De naam van de school staat nog wel op het terrein. Klopt dat wel? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-16 08:12:43 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179745941 (Comments: 1) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi. Just curious why you reverted my deletion. commented 2026-03-16 08:11:33 UTC by xyaonline ♦1 |
| 179762202 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179397345 (Comments: 2) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179807150 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179717992 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179398848 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179716344 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179721314 (Comments: 3) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179391685 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179396575 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179396465 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179396135 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179391899 (Comments: 1) | 2GT9Schwilgue (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207 commented 2026-03-16 08:11:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179890005 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | ok. vielen dank für die Korrektur im Plan. commented 2026-03-16 08:11:21 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 179396320 (Comments: 1) | charlie-kirk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935029 commented 2026-03-16 08:06:40 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179396358 (Comments: 1) | charlie-kirk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935029 commented 2026-03-16 08:06:40 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179395980 (Comments: 1) | charlie-kirk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935029 commented 2026-03-16 08:06:40 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179396283 (Comments: 1) | charlie-kirk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935029 commented 2026-03-16 08:06:40 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179394953 (Comments: 1) | charlie-kirk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935029 commented 2026-03-16 08:06:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179395881 (Comments: 1) | charlie-kirk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935029 commented 2026-03-16 08:06:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179396292 (Comments: 1) | epstein_FN_evan burger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934955 commented 2026-03-16 08:04:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179396246 (Comments: 1) | epstein_FN_evan burger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934955 commented 2026-03-16 08:04:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
 | 179395079 (Comments: 1) | epstein_FN_evan burger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934944 commented 2026-03-16 08:04:18 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179395936 (Comments: 1) | epstein_FN_evan burger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934944 commented 2026-03-16 08:04:18 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179395600 (Comments: 2) | epstein_FN_evan burger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934944 commented 2026-03-16 08:04:18 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179395004 (Comments: 1) | epstein_FN_evan burger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934944 commented 2026-03-16 08:04:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179395052 (Comments: 1) | epstein_FN_evan burger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934944 commented 2026-03-16 08:04:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179892360 (Comments: 4) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 141) | tag entfernt. commented 2026-03-16 08:02:59 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦61 |
| 179911964 (Comments: 1) | pasq_fr (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi pasq_fr, this changeset has damaged the "Ateliers des Capucins" building seriously: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-4.49863&lat=48.38777&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=dupli... commented 2026-03-16 08:01:25 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 179893133 (Comments: 1) | SimonPoole (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi SimonPoole, this changeset has left behind a damaged glacier relation: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.79518&lat=46.46049&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_... commented 2026-03-16 07:56:40 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 179774711 (Comments: 3) | Stay Texas Hospitality Group (Discussed changesets: 1) | @MappingMore Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179808537 would... commented 2026-03-16 07:56:11 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179695429 (Comments: 3) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | @Wildsharky Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179927858 would ... commented 2026-03-16 07:54:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179698958 (Comments: 3) | Abuke123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Wildsharky Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179734278 wo... commented 2026-03-16 07:53:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179888731 (Comments: 1) | Aldeyde (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Aldeyde, this changeset has left behind a damaged boundary relation for "Monte Sole": https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.20333&lat=44.29076&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=dup... commented 2026-03-16 07:51:58 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 179934302 (Comments: 1) | americanstoragesunbury (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 07:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179881363 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 42) | I've looked over them all. They should be in order now. commented 2026-03-16 07:48:28 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦30 |
| 179715389 (Comments: 2) | Orlppor (Discussed changesets: 2) | 抱歉，一般穿过村庄的路都顺手这么给画了，如有破坏请您再进行修改，感谢 commented 2026-03-16 07:39:28 UTC by Orlppor ♦2 |
| 179933856 (Comments: 1) | OscarVera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-16 07:36:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
 | 155747972 (Comments: 1) | chaim255 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151524541 - you've changed name tag without changing the name:he - they should be the same here. And you've changed only Hebrew name, not the English one, is it deliberate? commented 2026-03-16 07:35:51 UTC by Sanniu ♦639 |
 | 179726109 (Comments: 1) | HussainAkn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179788820 commented 2026-03-16 07:31:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179718513 (Comments: 1) | rapha rr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 179751482 commented 2026-03-16 07:30:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179689292 (Comments: 1) | xyaonline (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 179745941 commented 2026-03-16 07:29:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179703831 (Comments: 1) | owennson (Discussed changesets: 100) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179744310 commented 2026-03-16 07:28:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179933394 (Comments: 1) | map_unending (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-16 07:27:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179724437 (Comments: 1) | koperasi desa merah putih pondokkubang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179740903 commented 2026-03-16 07:27:17 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 168944081 (Comments: 2) | samho1234567 (Discussed changesets: 31) | 我在註釋中已表明：連城新天地的官方名稱為繁體字 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800275817 https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1973719415062279896 commented 2026-03-16 07:27:14 UTC by samho1234567 ♦30 |
| 179696832 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted changeset id:179928285 commented 2026-03-16 07:26:33 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179692436 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in changeset id : 179928086 commented 2026-03-16 07:25:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179674498 (Comments: 2) | Kennybenny12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179735937 commented 2026-03-16 07:24:36 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179932987 (Comments: 1) | mottiger (Discussed changesets: 24) | + source: local knowledge commented 2026-03-16 07:23:54 UTC by mottiger ♦44 |
| 179694847 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in changeset id:179927915 commented 2026-03-16 07:23:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179699784 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in changeset id:179754032 commented 2026-03-16 07:21:34 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179700368 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in changeset id:179753818 commented 2026-03-16 07:20:05 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179303418 (Comments: 1) | TAMTAM17 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi TAMTAM17, this changeset has created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-5.26411&lat=35.17236&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Stand... commented 2026-03-16 07:20:02 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 179309867 (Comments: 1) | TAMTAM17 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi TAMTAM17, this changeset has created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-5.26411&lat=35.17236&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Stand... commented 2026-03-16 07:19:44 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 179699674 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in changeset id:179753618 commented 2026-03-16 07:19:10 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179704229 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in changeset id:179753194 commented 2026-03-16 07:18:22 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179701951 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in changeset id:179799165 commented 2026-03-16 07:17:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179704305 (Comments: 1) | taxi777 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted in changeset id:179733939 commented 2026-03-16 07:14:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179757055 (Comments: 1) | XVI01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 179927181 commented 2026-03-16 07:12:25 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
 | 179750039 (Comments: 1) | أبو نهاد المضمد (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 179800001 commented 2026-03-16 07:11:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦137 |
| 179924580 (Comments: 3) | VU THI HANG (Discussed changesets: 1) | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179925100 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. ... commented 2026-03-16 06:37:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 171207963 (Comments: 1) | Дымков Артём Денисович (Discussed changesets: 44) | дорожки в парке в Москве сейчас не называются "Владимирский тракт", равно как и Московская область не называется Московской губерн... commented 2026-03-16 06:36:44 UTC by literan ♦7,027 |
| 178516175 (Comments: 2) | Tre_brock (Discussed changesets: 6) | Was there any particular reason that you wanted to delete separately mapped sidewalks? commented 2026-03-16 06:35:18 UTC by jhuang97 ♦18 |
| 179925101 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 79) | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179925101 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. ... commented 2026-03-16 06:34:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179652454 (Comments: 1) | Tre_brock (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Tre, I would prefer if you did not delete sidewalks like this, see my comment under changeset 178516175. commented 2026-03-16 06:34:59 UTC by jhuang97 ♦18 |
| 179924873 (Comments: 3) | Elaine Angelo (Discussed changesets: 1) | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179925101 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. ... commented 2026-03-16 06:34:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179911611 (Comments: 3) | jeryBL (Discussed changesets: 1) | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179911819 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. ... commented 2026-03-16 06:31:10 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,065 |
| 179895883 (Comments: 1) | 林博仁 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 如果該地沒有地址的話，可以不用加地址相關的標籤 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179895883 commented 2026-03-16 06:09:35 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,257 |
| 179929671 (Comments: 1) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 13) | The comment should say "updated POI" commented 2026-03-16 06:03:39 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦14 |
| 179809857 (Comments: 2) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 466) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790665995/history#map=19/50.410261/19.052371 commented 2026-03-16 05:55:43 UTC by olo81 ♦713 |
| 179928945 (Comments: 1) | BLASSTER44 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-16 05:48:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 172957321 (Comments: 1) | epoillac (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin aus Wildeshausen! Du hast hier mehrmals landuse=* bzw leisure=park Flächen mit highway=* Wegen verbunden. Waren das Versehen? Eigentlich sollen die ja nicht miteinander verbunden werden. commented 2026-03-16 05:47:16 UTC by GerdP ♦2,821 |
| 179872823 (Comments: 1) | kobejim2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Can you please go back and clean up all your fairways. They should not intersect or overlap with the green like you've done many times of the last few changes. Thanks. commented 2026-03-16 05:40:31 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179517636 (Comments: 2) | Bikram Kumar Singh (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179928509 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here. commented 2026-03-16 05:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179507101 (Comments: 2) | Alphadico (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179507356 commented 2026-03-16 05:33:03 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179506840 (Comments: 2) | Alphadico (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179507101 commented 2026-03-16 05:33:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179797546 (Comments: 1) | RezGolf (Discussed changesets: 6) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488525955 When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shoul... commented 2026-03-16 05:27:10 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179817785 (Comments: 1) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 466) | Było dobrze. Nazwa opisowa do poprawy. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2026-03-16 05:23:42 UTC by olo81 ♦713 |
| 179822414 (Comments: 1) | Taylor Gibson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Be careful marking out "rough" areas. They shouldn't extend deep into the trees. They also shouldn't intersect/touch other golf areas (like fairways and tees). Thanks. commented 2026-03-16 05:14:39 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
 | 179926411 (Comments: 2) | Oriam González Fundora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tienes, toda la razón, Ya está realizado el cambio!!. Gracias. commented 2026-03-16 05:06:49 UTC by Oriam González Fundora ♦1 |
| 168239711 (Comments: 1) | otowm (Discussed changesets: 1) | existe alguma rua mesmo?, não tem nenhuma imagem de satelite que comprove commented 2026-03-16 05:03:16 UTC by O Fim ♦21 |
| 179927070 (Comments: 1) | Happy Labor LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 04:51:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179649220 (Comments: 1) | Shrikanttt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179926860 commented 2026-03-16 04:47:38 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179926767 (Comments: 1) | Happy Labor LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 04:40:04 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179924765 (Comments: 3) | f_husni (Discussed changesets: 8) | node/6645443820 berada di Kabupaten Tangerang. commented 2026-03-16 04:05:43 UTC by FajrAl ♦219 |
| 179077325 (Comments: 2) | f_husni (Discussed changesets: 8) | halo, iya betul sudah saya cek memang benar ada beberapa di dukuhbenda, kemungkinan saya salah klik changeset comment di editor saya. terimakasih sudah mengingatkan. happy mapping! commented 2026-03-16 04:04:26 UTC by f_husni ♦46 |
| 179744579 (Comments: 2) | pesec (Discussed changesets: 92) | Хорошо commented 2026-03-16 04:03:23 UTC by pesec ♦309 |
| 179732383 (Comments: 2) | pesec (Discussed changesets: 92) | Здравствуйте. поправил commented 2026-03-16 04:01:24 UTC by pesec ♦309 |
| 179734558 (Comments: 2) | pesec (Discussed changesets: 92) | Здравствуйте. Попытался отразить схему движения на этом сложном перекрестке с разделением на отдельный ветки. Попробую проще. commented 2026-03-16 03:41:53 UTC by pesec ♦309 |
 | 179923755 (Comments: 1) | AhmedHussien (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6841253704 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-16 03:40:41 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179586727 (Comments: 2) | DoubleA (Discussed changesets: 57) | I'll give you till this Friday to reply back, otherwise I'll revert it Saturday NZT. commented 2026-03-16 03:00:01 UTC by EleGlobe ♦12 |
| 176201400 (Comments: 1) | ATownBike (Discussed changesets: 13) | according to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway cycleway is still appropriate. this is also more important as this is part of USBRS 10 commented 2026-03-16 02:46:20 UTC by Natfoot ♦106 |
| 179923816 (Comments: 1) | mikeOSMandPlus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Submited 3 times if this node still get rejected I will fucking move back to Google Map. commented 2026-03-16 02:40:11 UTC by mikeOSMandPlus ♦1 |
| 179923884 (Comments: 1) | Bulldog Digital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 02:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179821732 (Comments: 1) | beatpoet (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, just a note to say you shouldn't add footpath numbers in 'ref' - prow_ref= is the only place this information should be recorded. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_Rights_of_Way.... commented 2026-03-16 02:30:22 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦199 |
 | 179907056 (Comments: 1) | Catjacket (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted because of broken coastlines. Please check your changes again and you can revert my revert with the fix. commented 2026-03-16 02:25:16 UTC by vng_me ♦140 |
| 178968567 (Comments: 2) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 48) | My name is Gaurav, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for your insight! There are different approaches on the OSM for adding turn:lanes. Our general approach is to add lanes & turn:lanes tag only when there ar... commented 2026-03-16 02:23:58 UTC by grawat_Lyft ♦16 |
| 178969535 (Comments: 2) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hi, my name is Gaurav and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment. Based on the most recent Lyft-owned aerial imagery(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bvxjLNAX0ovVQJdJhGNgUBWZ3-H0wpKN/view?usp=sharing), it clearly sh... commented 2026-03-16 02:22:25 UTC by grawat_Lyft ♦16 |
| 179904677 (Comments: 1) | OnlyAppleCanDo (Discussed changesets: 9) | 你提到的“实际管理的行政区划”若指的是“海洋空间的划区功能管理”（即“海域管理”），则你划分至中山市、广州市边界关系的范围已超过了两市国土空间总体规划... commented 2026-03-16 02:03:36 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦38 |
| 179923415 (Comments: 1) | mikeOSMandPlus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 02:00:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 171442389 (Comments: 1) | Cosmin_Matifalean (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. I saw your recent edit where the barrier was added to the junction instead of the blocked way ID. Due to its placement at a junction, it has blocked navigation to other areas, resulting in incorrect routing. The next tim... commented 2026-03-16 01:58:37 UTC by GrabMY_ainayusof ♦34 |
| 179881105 (Comments: 3) | Channel91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yeah you are right that the grayed values are usually the implied defaults so it is strange that they are all set to yes. I asked some people who are more experienced than I am. One said they usually don't set the access tag unless it is signed ... commented 2026-03-16 01:57:46 UTC by jm428 ♦41 |
| 179923283 (Comments: 1) | mikeOSMandPlus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 01:51:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179922825 (Comments: 1) | CalvinLewis26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9733532751 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-16 01:22:33 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179922846 (Comments: 1) | Josue 12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Josue 12, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 2 amenity(s) - 29 building(s) - 1 craft(s) |
| 171088636 (Comments: 1) | sudotomi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, 'level' tag must be numeric. Thus the value was correct (but should probably be 0, ground level). If the locals call it "P", then that goes into level:ref tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level:ref . commented 2026-03-16 00:44:18 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,819 |
| 179922358 (Comments: 1) | CalvinLewis26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-16 00:39:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179881452 (Comments: 1) | allaboutmikey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also moved the boundary of the residential area so it doesn't cut off this house and neighbouring new house sites. commented 2026-03-15 23:33:55 UTC by allaboutmikey ♦1 |
| 179917866 (Comments: 2) | 1Mmarek (Discussed changesets: 15) | v konfliktoch by som to veľmi rád vyriešil, len mi nič také neponúklo - "chyba, bod <číslo> neexistuje, strč sa" :/ prepáč za chaosy. Tvoje zmeny by mali byť znova viditeľ... commented 2026-03-15 23:31:33 UTC by 1Mmarek ♦15 |
| 179669801 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 168) | Oh, okay. I guess that makes sense. When I get the chance, I'll fix these road links (and fix the shoulders of the Beltway as well). commented 2026-03-15 23:15:20 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦200 |
| 179664487 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Revert (Discussed changesets: 5) | See reply on changeset 179664298 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179664298#c1569545 commented 2026-03-15 23:07:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦19 |
| 179664039 (Comments: 6) | CAM-Gerlach_Revert (Discussed changesets: 5) | See reply on changeset 179664298 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179664298#c1569545 commented 2026-03-15 23:07:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦19 |
| 179664298 (Comments: 9) | CAM-Gerlach_Revert (Discussed changesets: 5) | While normally I would suggest you go ahead and make the change yourself or leave a note (as I see you did), since I was responsible for the revert and you at least put in the effort to reach out I went ahead and in changeset/179920106 changeset/1799... commented 2026-03-15 23:06:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦19 |
| 179830457 (Comments: 1) | Herr Bause (Discussed changesets: 4) | Der Unterstand von den Bushaltestellen sind keine Gebäuden, daher ist building=yes falsch. commented 2026-03-15 22:57:42 UTC by barefootstache ♦14 |
| 179920489 (Comments: 1) | Alisher02 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-15 22:54:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178220104 (Comments: 1) | Stefano inforesta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Stefano, davvero questo salice si chiama "Rifugio Per Sosta"? commented 2026-03-15 22:49:17 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,864 |
| 179918917 (Comments: 5) | AlexF999 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Auch das wurde nun verbessert. Ich hoffe, dass nun alle Fehler behoben sind und wieder alles so ist, wie es sein soll. Danke noch mal für den Hinweis. LG commented 2026-03-15 22:41:51 UTC by AlexF999 ♦2 |
| 179877911 (Comments: 1) | Julia Silveira Conceição (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, caminhos devem ser conectados em outras vias, e não ficar "soltos" no mapa commented 2026-03-15 22:40:39 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,207 |
| 179897385 (Comments: 1) | dewlapt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-03-15 22:35:18 UTC by Comino ♦323 |
| 179812540 (Comments: 1) | GCL1860 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bravo pour cette nouvelle contribution. Chouette initiative. Cependant, je ne suis pas certain qu'OSM soit prévu pour héberger des données temporaires de manifestations. "Ne cartographiez pas les &eac... commented 2026-03-15 22:32:19 UTC by Pan ♦63 |
| 134588759 (Comments: 3) | triggered_cookies (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für die Info. Das mit den Bürokraten stimmt ja bei OSM nicht so ganz, bei wird jede einzelne Regel so lange erbittert diskutiert, bis keiner mehr durchblickt ... ;-). Wenn es nach den Bürokraten ginge, müssten nicht ... commented 2026-03-15 22:25:29 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦95 |
| 178379274 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179919913 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 22:25:11 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179919848 (Comments: 1) | Alex Hopper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 22:21:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 22041066 (Comments: 3) | bigbug21 (Discussed changesets: 113) | Ok, danke. Als ich da neulich vorbei bin, sah das ganz Gelände völlig verwaist aus. Fahre da in ein paar Tagen wieder vorbei und schaue mir das noch mal näher an. commented 2026-03-15 22:14:49 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦95 |
| 179916965 (Comments: 7) | ReinderH (Discussed changesets: 8) | Opgelost met dam.. Bron Obliek Slagboom&Peeters commented 2026-03-15 22:06:30 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 178401434 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179919234 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 22:04:46 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 177977054 (Comments: 3) | gkornelson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. I didn't realized that. I worked in that pit when it was the Afton pit. commented 2026-03-15 22:03:08 UTC by SteveWMc ♦1 |
| 179767972 (Comments: 4) | NasuFoito (Discussed changesets: 12) | Я откатила пакет, спасибо за замечание. commented 2026-03-15 21:50:45 UTC by NasuFoito ♦10 |
| 179915949 (Comments: 2) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19964 commented 2026-03-15 21:50:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179918333 (Comments: 2) | Pingu_88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | De ruiterroute https://riding.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16.0/51.9948/5.7147 Mocht die aangegeven ruiterroute niet meer bestaan laat maar weten hoe de route dan nu loopt. commented 2026-03-15 21:50:29 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179915936 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915663 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915897 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915872 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915788 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915702 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915413 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915556 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915496 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915442 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179915308 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179764612 (Comments: 4) | NasuFoito (Discussed changesets: 12) | Поняла, хорошо commented 2026-03-15 21:46:25 UTC by NasuFoito ♦10 |
| 173629537 (Comments: 3) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Okay, bedankt, verander jij bicycle_road=yes in cyclestreet=yes voor deze 3 weg segmenten? commented 2026-03-15 21:46:17 UTC by emvee ♦399 |
| 179918411 (Comments: 1) | Pingu_88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dan kan het toch nooit access=no zijn? Dat is verboden toegang. Ik heb access=no omgezet naar motor_vehicle=forestry bicycle en foot=yes heb ik laten staan, maar eigenlijk is dat default op tracks. Accesstagging is gewoon echt lastig te ... commented 2026-03-15 21:44:13 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179913993 (Comments: 2) | rhevia (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola! Muchas gracias por tus observaciones y comentarios! Como es un camino rural sin un número de dirección, se indicó como señala la página. commented 2026-03-15 21:39:29 UTC by rhevia ♦1 |
| 148465518 (Comments: 2) | shtrophic (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, ja, soweit ich mich erinnere ist es wohl eine historische/nicht öffentliche. Evtl. mit "disused" taggen? commented 2026-03-15 21:38:07 UTC by shtrophic ♦4 |
| 178564266 (Comments: 1) | miozzo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Olá miozzo, Estou tentando entender a importância dessa nova opção viária. Teria mais informações? Essa ponte seria parte de um novo traçado da SC-135, o qual passaria por fora da &... commented 2026-03-15 21:32:05 UTC by santamariense ♦847 |
| 179776767 (Comments: 1) | Oberlausitzer42 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo Oberlausitzer42! Warum vergreifst du dich wiederholt an den Straßenklassifizierungen? Du hast es leider immer noch nicht begriffen. Es sind zwar Straßen, welche durch den Ort verlaufen, aber es sind Staatstraßen und ... commented 2026-03-15 21:29:11 UTC by BrummsLee ♦41 |
| 178412649 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179918431 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 21:27:36 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179913539 (Comments: 4) | yzal (Discussed changesets: 13) | len mi prosím napíš ako sa rozhodneš commented 2026-03-15 21:25:17 UTC by 1Mmarek ♦15 |
| 179523980 (Comments: 1) | Leokand (Discussed changesets: 2) | Не надо ставить type=waterway на элементы в отношении. Поправил. commented 2026-03-15 21:19:05 UTC by sikmir ♦11 |
| 179916970 (Comments: 1) | Jurci705 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4735181092 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-15 21:16:14 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 178423167 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179917446 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 21:14:30 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179890942 (Comments: 1) | victorelgueta (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hola Víctor. Esto es una mala práctica. Por favor no borrar cosas.Pueden adaptarse. Con JOSM es facil. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179890942 commented 2026-03-15 21:12:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179917501 (Comments: 1) | MOMENTUM Nieruchomości (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 21:03:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179859811 (Comments: 2) | Bocatapan (Discussed changesets: 8) | Además, si la vía está etiquetada como "construction" los navegadores no calcularán ninguna ruta para los peatones, lo cual no creo que sea cierto porque los vecinos deben de poder acceder a sus viviendas a pie.<... commented 2026-03-15 21:01:51 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,763 |
| 179876549 (Comments: 4) | ChrisFromRV (Discussed changesets: 144) | @Langlaeufer Kann ich morgen gerne machen. commented 2026-03-15 21:00:07 UTC by SammysHP ♦136 |
| 178467144 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179917221 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 20:55:30 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179311516 (Comments: 21) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 80) | Nie pytałem jak działa iD. Pytałem o jego konkretną funkcjonalność. Ale poradzę sobie bez niej, o ile w ogóle ona w iD istnieje. Jakbyś czytał uważnie co napisałem, to zauważyłbyś, że wśród błędów nie wym... commented 2026-03-15 20:54:18 UTC by YomanNH ♦478 |
| 168335012 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_trampm (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello, is there actually a road that runs through here? I was checking the images I took and I don't see a road here it looks like a pedestrian footway. Xin chào, thực sự có con đường nào chạy qua đâ... commented 2026-03-15 20:48:31 UTC by QuiLe ♦48 |
| 179914352 (Comments: 1) | rhevia (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola. Ese es el nombre del camino o del condominio?. Son cosas distintas. Por favor no asumir que las calles se llaman como el comdominio. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2026-03-15 20:26:11 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 179894707 (Comments: 1) | Gruppe-913 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Der Name des Gebäudes ist "GDW - Gesellschaft für Dach- u. Wandtechnik mbH"? commented 2026-03-15 20:16:32 UTC by Bienson ♦526 |
| 178500020 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179916090 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 20:16:07 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179915616 (Comments: 1) | AgathaS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Olá, use as imagens da Esri que estão mais atualizadas, as vezes elas nem sempre estão alinhadas. Verifique com a comunidade antes de alterar a classificação de vias. Vou reverter algumas edições... commented 2026-03-15 20:12:36 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,207 |
| 179914731 (Comments: 1) | rhevia (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola. Buena edición, pero ya estaba la Copec agregada. Además, dejó todo pegado al sistema de direcciones. Voy arreglarlo, pero por favor ojo con las cosas que agrega y toca. saludos --- ... commented 2026-03-15 20:09:34 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,879 |
| 177115447 (Comments: 4) | Tiny Pop (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks commented 2026-03-15 20:05:56 UTC by Tristan West ♦6 |
| 178844493 (Comments: 2) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 40) | Danke, ich hatte mittels Satelliten- und Straßenbildern gemapped. Trotzdem würde ich dich bitten, für solche Elemente vielleicht lifecycle-prefixes zu verwenden (bspw. razed:*=*) statt sie zu löschen. Dann werden diese auch nicht... commented 2026-03-15 20:05:34 UTC by stirps ♦32 |
| 176727264 (Comments: 3) | Adam Lanza 2020 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks commented 2026-03-15 20:04:45 UTC by Tristan West ♦6 |
| 176727294 (Comments: 3) | Adam Lanza 2020 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks commented 2026-03-15 20:04:37 UTC by Tristan West ♦6 |
| 171942243 (Comments: 4) | Bubble Epic (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks commented 2026-03-15 20:04:05 UTC by Tristan West ♦6 |
| 179915136 (Comments: 2) | Anita Fernandes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Olá, deve-se usar imagens mais recentes para editar o mapa. Revertido! commented 2026-03-15 20:04:03 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,207 |
| 179914615 (Comments: 2) | Anita Fernandes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Olá, deve-se usar imagens mais recentes para editar o mapa. Revertido! commented 2026-03-15 20:03:48 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,207 |
| 179913868 (Comments: 1) | Anita Fernandes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Olá, deve-se usar imagens mais recentes para editar o mapa. Revertido! commented 2026-03-15 20:03:34 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,207 |
| 176135266 (Comments: 1) | Noro Hibu (Discussed changesets: 85) | Вижу Вы много делали правок ОКТМО но прекратили работу 3 месяца назад. А сейчас ужу есть "Изменение 908/2026 ОКТМО". Вы планируете это вн... commented 2026-03-15 20:03:13 UTC by fserges ♦56 |
| 176652473 (Comments: 3) | Johnson 2009 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Cool commented 2026-03-15 19:56:04 UTC by Tristan West ♦6 |
| 178429499 (Comments: 19) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 123) | So, there exists no rule, that says that "the track having entry signals must be tagged with usage=*" and yet you say that it is a must based on exemplary graphic... Mhm. Sorry, but this is not a rule which has been agreed on, but only your... commented 2026-03-15 19:55:10 UTC by Anas masuris ♦170 |
| 179881842 (Comments: 2) | Waldis2009 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Откатывать пакеты правок очень просто. Вы и сами можете это освоить. Один из методов - поставьте себе крутой редактор,JOSM. Кстати, с его пом... commented 2026-03-15 19:52:19 UTC by Calibrator ♦17 |
| 178845278 (Comments: 1) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 40) | In diesem Änderungssatz wurden ein neues Telefon hinzufügt. Ich hatte diese in OSM bereits 2025 gelöscht, da es vollständig zurückgebaut waren. Auch heute steht hier kein (neues) Telefon. Bitte keine Dinge bei OSM eintragen, ... commented 2026-03-15 19:43:10 UTC by johnny_1982 ♦149 |
| 179534030 (Comments: 2) | Marc1152 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, gut dass du fragst. Ich hatte immer die größte Öffnung bei geschlossener Barriere genommen. Jetzt sehe ich gerade, dass es als maxwidth:physical getagged wird, was laut Wiki größte Öffnung bei offener Barrie... commented 2026-03-15 19:29:58 UTC by Marc1152 ♦2 |
| 179913582 (Comments: 1) | Furiusz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ta droga już powstała? Czy jaki jest jej status aktualnie? commented 2026-03-15 19:13:19 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179871742 (Comments: 5) | camelino (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dank voor de link. Zojuist geprobeerd maar kent dezelfde beperkingen als Organic maps wat betreft toevoegingen op de kaart. commented 2026-03-15 19:11:07 UTC by camelino ♦3 |
| 179512738 (Comments: 7) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 45) | easy understandable for me :-) commented 2026-03-15 19:05:44 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 179913593 (Comments: 1) | Adn Digital 360 - Agence SEO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 18:57:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178516141 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179912888 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 18:55:39 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179913452 (Comments: 1) | fserges (Discussed changesets: 25) | This is wrong location. Corrects is here: https://yandex.ru/maps/geo/posyolok_baranikha/53064319/?ll=168.284068%2C68.500228&z=14.62 commented 2026-03-15 18:53:47 UTC by fserges ♦56 |
| 179913335 (Comments: 1) | Adn Digital 360 - Agence SEO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 18:51:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179100013 (Comments: 1) | Dengue Barra Mansa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá Dengue Barra Mansa, O que são vias terciárias e quais variáveis você analisou para chegar à conclusão de que não são terciárias? Bons mapeamentos. commented 2026-03-15 18:43:45 UTC by santamariense ♦847 |
| 179908580 (Comments: 1) | dialect1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-03-15 18:36:56 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179902904 (Comments: 1) | dialect1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-03-15 18:36:20 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179903339 (Comments: 1) | Panlosos (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-15 18:35:00 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179903116 (Comments: 1) | Panlosos (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-15 18:34:54 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179900481 (Comments: 1) | Panlosos (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-15 18:34:41 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179900317 (Comments: 1) | Panlosos (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-15 18:34:31 UTC by bartgron ♦593 |
| 179911357 (Comments: 4) | Penegal (Discussed changesets: 23) | 🤩️🙏️ commented 2026-03-15 18:18:30 UTC by Penegal ♦43 |
| 179863669 (Comments: 2) | puplampu (Discussed changesets: 1) | noted, thank you commented 2026-03-15 18:17:17 UTC by puplampu ♦1 |
| 171029842 (Comments: 4) | Delli1951 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Danke für die Rückmeldung :) commented 2026-03-15 18:16:09 UTC by scratch_a ♦3 |
| 50886564 (Comments: 1) | zerpou (Discussed changesets: 51) | Salut, à quoi correspond la note=C+O ? commented 2026-03-15 18:09:10 UTC by Lejun ♦508 |
| 179909333 (Comments: 1) | Darklotfr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Darklotfr, Why did you delete all the buildings within lewis school pengam? commented 2026-03-15 18:05:37 UTC by kitsee ♦134 |
| 179909503 (Comments: 1) | melluh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag melluh, Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo. mapse eggie commented 2026-03-15 18:04:32 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179911345 (Comments: 1) | pasq_fr (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position. commented 2026-03-15 18:03:39 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 178523843 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179911444 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 18:00:59 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179910169 (Comments: 2) | ReinderH (Discussed changesets: 8) | Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen. commented 2026-03-15 18:00:22 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179846591 (Comments: 9) | rtfazeberdee (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've tried it in a different browser (Firefox - i usually use Vivaldi) and its the same with the 2nd Moreyoga higher up. commented 2026-03-15 17:56:41 UTC by rtfazeberdee ♦1 |
| 178636880 (Comments: 4) | jpdfive (Discussed changesets: 2) | The administrative boundary with its seaward extension is CORRECT, however odd it may seem. I will revert these changes. If anyone wants to discuss this, please get in touch BEFORE screwing up the data. commented 2026-03-15 17:54:43 UTC by Colin Smale ♦325 |
| 179886973 (Comments: 1) | 建園春秋 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. Use `description=` commented 2026-03-15 17:54:05 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,806 |
| 171556248 (Comments: 3) | esmenard (Discussed changesets: 3) | Pour le premier je confirme, il y a un panneau "uniquement personne à mobilité réduite" à l'intérieur. Pour le deuxième, il n'y a pas access=no et disabled=designated et je n'y ai pas... commented 2026-03-15 17:54:04 UTC by esmenard ♦14 |
| 178537099 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179911113 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 17:53:18 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178549441 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179910840 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 17:49:45 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178561466 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179910396 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 17:42:48 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179809199 (Comments: 2) | reki (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich habe die Karte benutzt "Saxony shaded ground." commented 2026-03-15 17:41:10 UTC by reki ♦1 |
 | 169873372 (Comments: 2) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 123) | Thank you for this hint. commented 2026-03-15 17:39:09 UTC by flierfy ♦67 |
| 179477206 (Comments: 2) | esthertaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179582188 commented 2026-03-15 17:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179477327 (Comments: 2) | IN Focus First (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179477700 commented 2026-03-15 17:33:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179475902 (Comments: 2) | Regent Restoration Denton (Discussed changesets: 3) | ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179483573 commented 2026-03-15 17:33:06 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179474670 (Comments: 2) | Wilson Thompson Insurance Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179910352 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-15 17:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 30449790 (Comments: 2) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 123) | I applied the current tagging scheme. And this scheme wants tracks, which are controlled by dwarf signals, to be tagged service= yard. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:usage commented 2026-03-15 17:22:23 UTC by flierfy ♦67 |
| 179909890 (Comments: 1) | RathcooleRambler (Discussed changesets: 3) | Also created separate building for Greggs as this is a new adjoined building and not part of the Abbeycentre commented 2026-03-15 17:22:06 UTC by RathcooleRambler ♦10 |
| 179909577 (Comments: 1) | successonthespectrum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 17:15:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179909046 (Comments: 2) | ReinderH (Discussed changesets: 8) | aanvulling > ligt>lag Het pad dat het weiland opgaat. Is dat niet voor landbouwvoertuigen. Dat zou het een highway=track zijn en niet een footway. commented 2026-03-15 17:15:20 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179662156 (Comments: 2) | codywindrose (Discussed changesets: 2) | Habe sie soeben alle auf area:highway= gestellt. commented 2026-03-15 17:14:45 UTC by codywindrose ♦4 |
| 33226871 (Comments: 2) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 123) | Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2026-03-15 17:11:16 UTC by flierfy ♦67 |
| 179909309 (Comments: 1) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 13) | The comment should say resolved note/5023437 commented 2026-03-15 17:07:59 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦14 |
| 179906823 (Comments: 2) | ReinderH (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ik snap het nog niet goed wat je bedoelt, maar ik heb zonet het westelijk gedeelte opnieuw verbonden aan een bestaand pad, want de door jouw gemaakte verbinding klopte niet. (als ik het goed heb, anders moet je me maar vergeven wegens onwetendheid... commented 2026-03-15 16:58:11 UTC by ReinderH ♦1 |
| 179705488 (Comments: 7) | Darnight14 (Discussed changesets: 11) | 这么强！？ commented 2026-03-15 16:50:29 UTC by Darnight14 ♦8 |
| 179763561 (Comments: 2) | hebolz (Discussed changesets: 15) | @MappingMore May i ask what exactly (and why) you reverted? This is CS 179763561; you wrote 179702671, but that is none of my CS?? commented 2026-03-15 16:48:20 UTC by hebolz ♦33 |
| 179908283 (Comments: 1) | HM2008 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-15 16:45:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179605830 (Comments: 1) | brimzw (Discussed changesets: 10) | In deze wijziging wordt de naam ALDI foutief naar Aldi aangepast. ALDI wordt in Nederland met hoofdletters geschreven, ook in geschreven tekst. De suggesties in de iD-editor zijn niet meer dan suggesties, het zijn geen foutmeldingen en vaak kloppen z... commented 2026-03-15 16:38:37 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,106 |
| 179905857 (Comments: 4) | Hnsptrs (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wanneer je editor iD gebruikt en met de linker muis onbewust klikt selecteer je een object. Wanneer je gaat schuiven met de linkermuisknop denk je de kaart te verschuiven, maar dat gebeurt niet. Je schuift dan in dit geval een node van het hek. W... commented 2026-03-15 16:38:37 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179907454 (Comments: 1) | MapSurfer26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 16:30:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
 | 179905688 (Comments: 5) | SZ475 (Discussed changesets: 1) | nope i cannot commented 2026-03-15 16:22:27 UTC by SZ475 ♦1 |
| 177552963 (Comments: 1) | Šulo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, myslim ze Regal v parku je uz aspon rok zavrety, davam ho na "was". Bol presunuty ku pumpe Slovnaft. commented 2026-03-15 16:22:00 UTC by MiroJanosik ♦144 |
| 179904326 (Comments: 4) | Hnsptrs (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oke.. Je kunt het zelf toevoegen. .. bicycle=no en dog=no Mapse commented 2026-03-15 16:12:44 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179903134 (Comments: 1) | ThaDanus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-15 15:50:25 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179904799 (Comments: 1) | Kristiana Bowling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-15 15:45:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179855067 (Comments: 1) | Meeerts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, Ограничен ли проезд (знаками, блоками или каким либо другим способом)? commented 2026-03-15 15:35:33 UTC by Carto_Graph ♦64 |
| 179840826 (Comments: 1) | Ugsea (Discussed changesets: 4) | Добрый день. А зачем здание внутри здания? commented 2026-03-15 15:35:25 UTC by Carto_Graph ♦64 |
| 174734664 (Comments: 2) | Геннадий Сахно (Discussed changesets: 1) | Скорее всего человек имел ввиду viewpoint, поставил его. commented 2026-03-15 15:35:18 UTC by Carto_Graph ♦64 |
| 179675199 (Comments: 3) | voloshchuk_mk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ответа нет, отменил. commented 2026-03-15 15:35:09 UTC by Carto_Graph ♦64 |
| 179199821 (Comments: 4) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 263) | 好的，我修改回來了 commented 2026-03-15 15:23:48 UTC by gillux ♦2 |
| 179887149 (Comments: 1) | AngusL (Discussed changesets: 1) | If this is this a problem with a specific OpenStreetMap-based router, it might be better to raise a support ticket there, as only a very broken router would send cars along the footpath. 1) The footpath is currently tagged with highway=path + ... commented 2026-03-15 15:22:55 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| X | 179854860 (Comments: 3) | Flynn Marquardt (Discussed changesets: 9) | None of that changes the fact that replacing "Fix member role." with something that described what you did would be helpful. commented 2026-03-15 15:21:15 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,696 |
| 146164267 (Comments: 1) | Tom Ameye (Discussed changesets: 105) | gebruik in het vervolg waterway=ditch ipv waterway=stream beek ≠ waterway=ditch commented 2026-03-15 15:20:22 UTC by Joske1020 ♦36 |
| 179897826 (Comments: 1) | voloshchuk_mk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Это не secondary. Почитайте справку: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=secondary?uselang=ru commented 2026-03-15 15:16:21 UTC by Carto_Graph ♦64 |
| 179114899 (Comments: 4) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 172) | You have the opportunity to check it on the ground. In my opinion, this location on the map looks relevant now. commented 2026-03-15 15:09:37 UTC by solenoid jam ♦193 |
| 179901488 (Comments: 1) | Panlosos (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-03-15 15:06:36 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦831 |
| 179719132 (Comments: 4) | Bangsadrengur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great, thanks ☺️ commented 2026-03-15 14:59:11 UTC by Bangsadrengur ♦1 |
| 174398603 (Comments: 1) | GenericUsername4 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Take care with the flow direction of waterways - I've had to reverse the direction of many of these. You can also view either the National Map Topographic layer or the USGS Topographic Maps layer to find out what they are named. (For example, th... commented 2026-03-15 14:56:44 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦37 |
| 179900882 (Comments: 1) | Nod5t5 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Bevor es zu Anfragen kommt, dass es keine Beschreibung für den Grund der Löschung gibt, möchte ich auf diesen Link verweisen: https://www.wgh-herrenhausen.de/wohnen/bauprojekte/godshorner-gruen commented 2026-03-15 14:52:00 UTC by Nod5t5 ♦19 |
| 178892812 (Comments: 3) | WOW3020 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hier een uitleg van wat er gemapt wordt : https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Scope commented 2026-03-15 14:48:48 UTC by Joske1020 ♦36 |
| 179709671 (Comments: 3) | WOW3020 (Discussed changesets: 2) | wat je wel kon doen was een note=* toevoegen, of was:name=* . commented 2026-03-15 14:44:40 UTC by Joske1020 ♦36 |
| 179899566 (Comments: 2) | bobbert123 (Discussed changesets: 16) | 👍🏻 commented 2026-03-15 14:41:07 UTC by bobbert123 ♦16 |
| 160809520 (Comments: 2) | sykul (Discussed changesets: 11) | Huh. In all likelihood I meant wood but accidently pasted the rest. commented 2026-03-15 14:40:08 UTC by sykul ♦82 |
| 179895010 (Comments: 1) | Samuel Asante (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Samuel Asante, use building=yes to map buildings. area=yes doesn't mean anything. commented 2026-03-15 14:31:22 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦147 |
| 179771821 (Comments: 2) | HM2008 (Discussed changesets: 2) | i will revisit it but the problem is i dont understand the problem with this... commented 2026-03-15 14:28:30 UTC by HM2008 ♦1 |
| 179900027 (Comments: 1) | Lê Tuấn Minh (Discussed changesets: 8) | Trình chỉnh sửa của tôi bị lỗi nên tự động upload lên máy chủ OSM mà không yêu cầu ghi chú, mô tả nhưng lại tự động sử dụng mô tả cũ changeset t... commented 2026-03-15 14:13:58 UTC by Lê Tuấn Minh ♦10 |
| 179899989 (Comments: 1) | Hoaglund and Sons Concrete (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 14:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179896963 (Comments: 1) | Thomas2012 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-15 14:08:06 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179896658 (Comments: 1) | Mens123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-15 14:06:52 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179579913 (Comments: 5) | efash (Discussed changesets: 1) | It seems great ! commented 2026-03-15 14:05:57 UTC by Yunan973 ♦96 |
| 179888930 (Comments: 4) | bobbert123 (Discussed changesets: 16) | top thnx commented 2026-03-15 14:01:04 UTC by bobbert123 ♦16 |
| 179898628 (Comments: 3) | Glorg3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1269874928 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1066767980 It's fairly easy to do this by mistake when panning the map in the iD editor. You have to make sure you're not accidentally clicking on p... commented 2026-03-15 13:52:28 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179898164 (Comments: 2) | Cwan123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position. commented 2026-03-15 13:44:01 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 178594758 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179897998 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 13:23:38 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 177566282 (Comments: 3) | Jk488 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Thanks for your quick response. Guido commented 2026-03-15 13:15:43 UTC by gscholz ♦2,927 |
| 179585534 (Comments: 1) | Kaio maps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM! You used many tags like "adega" in your edits. This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available ... commented 2026-03-15 13:14:45 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
 | 179895190 (Comments: 1) | Pilgrim₿ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're moving a business from one place to another, if it's a single node you can just drag it to its new location and update the tags. But if it's also a building it's probably simplest to crea... commented 2026-03-15 13:14:16 UTC by dankarran ♦108 |
| 179763827 (Comments: 1) | rodolfovargas (Discussed changesets: 79) | Hi, the tag 'gas:gn' isn't used in other places. What does it mean? commented 2026-03-15 13:04:50 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179897142 (Comments: 1) | B252697 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Exceptions are footpaths which are designated as walkways within the construction area. All based from this official source from Singapore National Parks Board: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/parks-docs/west-coast-park/west-coast-park-... commented 2026-03-15 13:02:26 UTC by B252697 ♦43 |
| 178630213 (Comments: 2) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179896898 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 12:56:15 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179896511 (Comments: 2) | Rainero (Discussed changesets: 105) | Aarg, Korrektur der Korrektur: hier wurde changeset/178630213 zurückgesetzt. commented 2026-03-15 12:54:15 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179485270 (Comments: 3) | hubandspoke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das stimmt natürlich, danke für den Hinweis! Ich passe es entsprechend an. Ist dir ansonsten noch was spezifisches aufgefallen oder war das ein allgemeiner Hinweis? commented 2026-03-15 12:53:54 UTC by hubandspoke ♦1 |
| 178613771 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179896511 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 12:47:42 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179888325 (Comments: 2) | uelimorf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position. commented 2026-03-15 12:42:43 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179884860 (Comments: 1) | lb personal training (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position. commented 2026-03-15 12:42:09 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 146071565 (Comments: 1) | NoelB (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11503392203 Large number of power=pole with material = w23 here. :) commented 2026-03-15 12:40:49 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
| 178636894 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179894374 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 12:40:09 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 126180436 (Comments: 1) | Brendan 'Speedie' Smith (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10024359694/ Could I ask what material = metalterrysignextinctionirishproof means? :) It's on a few of the bollards. commented 2026-03-15 12:34:15 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,049 |
 | 179895706 (Comments: 1) | Azian94 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 12:27:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179895134 (Comments: 3) | notmyproblem1_repair (Discussed changesets: 6) | imho non c'è bisogno di confermare che questo account secondario corrisponde a te in ogni changeset, vedo che c'è già il link nella bio. commented 2026-03-15 12:23:26 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,864 |
| 179895433 (Comments: 1) | ItaliA1delSole (Discussed changesets: 24) | Fix inizio competenza Anas (scusatemi per l'errore "pix") commented 2026-03-15 12:18:02 UTC by ItaliA1delSole ♦11 |
| 179894372 (Comments: 1) | jappiecommando123643534 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-03-15 12:12:38 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179646775 (Comments: 6) | JackFrank (Discussed changesets: 2) | This import has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179893983 The following changesets have been reverted: 179728637, 179720280, 179719022, 179653341, 179653226, 179653031, 179652885, 179652387, 179652029, 179651975, 17964... commented 2026-03-15 11:46:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
 | 179893983 (Comments: 1) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 81) | The following changesets have been reverted: 179728637,179720280,179719022,179653341,179653226,179653031,179652885,179652387,179652029,179651975,179649929,179649146,179647885,179646775,179644448,179610210,179610010,179603051,179590348,179588863,1... commented 2026-03-15 11:45:57 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179860501 (Comments: 6) | Dored1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19963 Import reverted in changesets: 179893379,179893377,179893371,179893367,179893364,179893360,179893356,179893352,179893347,179893343,179893339,179893335,179893332,179893331,179893328,17... commented 2026-03-15 11:31:47 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 176088355 (Comments: 1) | Map-Frank (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Map-Frank, vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag hier. Ich habe mir erlaubt, den Gebäude-Zustand von "bestehend" auf "geplant" zu ändern, vgl. auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix Best... commented 2026-03-15 11:26:43 UTC by Romwriter ♦213 |
| 179884318 (Comments: 1) | TraxB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo TraxB, vielen Dank für Deine Bearbeitung hier und herzlich Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Ich habe mir erlaubt, den Wald dort zu entfernen, wo der Neubau entstanden ist, und außerdem die Gebäudeteile, den Gebäudeumriss (vgl.... commented 2026-03-15 11:20:32 UTC by Romwriter ♦213 |
| 179718666 (Comments: 5) | Jens Wittmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke dir. Das ist mir auch schon mal passiert. In Vespucci darf man nicht die "42" treffen, man muss das "Zettel"-Symbol nehmen. Viel Spaß weiterhin. commented 2026-03-15 11:18:28 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,393 |
| 178649236 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179892204 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 11:08:02 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179885974 (Comments: 2) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 60) | Das eine Item wurde von Mr.Ibrahembot erstellt. Das andere von Sk!db8t. Sieht aus wie Kandidaten zum Mergen. commented 2026-03-15 11:06:41 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦31 |
| 179847382 (Comments: 2) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 23) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19962 commented 2026-03-15 11:02:12 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179847400 (Comments: 1) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted border edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179892022 commented 2026-03-15 10:53:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179847253 (Comments: 1) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted border edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179892022 commented 2026-03-15 10:53:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179847163 (Comments: 1) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted border edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179892022 commented 2026-03-15 10:53:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 178670716 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179891772 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 10:49:18 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178680762 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179891126 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 10:35:52 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 178689554 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179890897 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 10:28:48 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179570279 (Comments: 1) | rishiyadav29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, please don't create duplicates of items which already exist. I have removed the stadiums in https://osm.org/changeset/179890981 commented 2026-03-15 10:27:45 UTC by kasa kai ♦30 |
| 179890698 (Comments: 1) | uelimorf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-15 10:21:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 178533255 (Comments: 5) | gc27 (Discussed changesets: 5) | 日本以外の事例が参考になるとは考えていません。 あなたの主張したいことは何ですか？ commented 2026-03-15 10:16:52 UTC by gc27 ♦18 |
| 179463207 (Comments: 4) | JuanjoMC (Discussed changesets: 25) | I just noticed iD says that man_made shouldn't be on a line, which then breaks the autocomplete to a charge_point... commented 2026-03-15 10:15:21 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 179872123 (Comments: 4) | Ozon OSM16 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Согласна с Вами, но и "странных" адресов полно, буду бдительнее, спасибо, что указали commented 2026-03-15 10:09:48 UTC by Ozon OSM16 ♦4 |
| 179531920 (Comments: 1) | brianh (Discussed changesets: 117) | Hi, what's the difference between a "ground_control_point_test" and a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point ? commented 2026-03-15 10:08:59 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179825287 (Comments: 2) | lann (Discussed changesets: 12) | Tu as raison. Tout était faux. Au lieu de commenter les modifications, pourquoi tu ne corriges pas ce qui ne va pas ? commented 2026-03-15 10:04:38 UTC by lann ♦17 |
| 179826410 (Comments: 1) | JohnnyDoes (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello JohnnyDoes, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Iraq. I noticed you changed some highway classifications to a service Examples of highways : way 1488669621, way 1488669620, way 1487919248, way 1459542302 and caused a brea... commented 2026-03-15 09:56:01 UTC by little_maper ♦93 |
| 179572126 (Comments: 1) | anarchicpingu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Quale e i typo del Caritas social_facility=? ... group home, shelter, nursing home... Ciao commented 2026-03-15 09:45:46 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,479 |
| 179856234 (Comments: 1) | fosuekua (Discussed changesets: 1) | Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects. I reverted this changeset. commented 2026-03-15 09:44:36 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179860454 (Comments: 1) | Richmond Danquah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects. I reverted this changeset. commented 2026-03-15 09:43:30 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179860837 (Comments: 1) | Sahaabi Ameen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects. I reverted this changeset. commented 2026-03-15 09:42:45 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179860858 (Comments: 1) | oneday1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects. I reverted this changeset. commented 2026-03-15 09:38:35 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179860258 (Comments: 1) | RafiqHussain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects. I reverted this changeset. commented 2026-03-15 09:36:43 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179861658 (Comments: 1) | Obinkyere Daniel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects. I reverted this changeset. commented 2026-03-15 09:35:00 UTC by mueschel ♦6,998 |
| 179841564 (Comments: 2) | 海上升明月 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks a lot for fixing my accidental node drag! I'm new to OSM, and I'll be more careful to check my edits before submitting next time. commented 2026-03-15 09:27:32 UTC by 海上升明月 ♦1 |
| 179817222 (Comments: 4) | ItsDurian (Discussed changesets: 4) | one more thing, it would help to put "note= newly opened on dd/yy" if the feature doesn't show on any osm approved aerial imagery. commented 2026-03-15 09:27:25 UTC by kucai ♦113 |
| 179882141 (Comments: 1) | Waldis2009 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Просьба откатить этот пакет правок commented 2026-03-15 09:20:01 UTC by Waldis2009 ♦3 |
| 179888014 (Comments: 1) | Waldis2009 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Просьба откатить этот пакет правок commented 2026-03-15 09:18:43 UTC by Waldis2009 ♦3 |
| 178696658 (Comments: 1) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 141) | Revert mit changeset/179888365 (unzulässige Quelle) commented 2026-03-15 09:13:28 UTC by Rainero ♦736 |
| 179752279 (Comments: 1) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Revert of 179744094 commented 2026-03-15 09:03:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 179733370 (Comments: 2) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 81) | On OSM we draw borders according to actual on the ground control. Not according to how we'd like the borders to look. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories for more information. commented 2026-03-15 09:02:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,558 |
| 179849185 (Comments: 2) | crgbsly (Discussed changesets: 4) | added commented 2026-03-15 08:42:46 UTC by crgbsly ♦1 |
| 179772649 (Comments: 1) | Aarav588 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Aarav 588, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in the United Arab Emirates. I noticed that you changed the **ref tags** for several streets, for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47855631 https://www.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2026-03-15 08:36:41 UTC by salma_z ♦19 |
| 179865819 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 263) | Revert of 179781687 commented 2026-03-15 08:34:29 UTC by MappingMore ♦246 |
| 178471350 (Comments: 1) | novaTopFlex (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, names shouldn’t go on the ways that make up the boundary relation, unless there’s a special name for a particular part of the boundary. The name of the city is already on the boundary relation; that should be enough for a renderer to ... commented 2026-03-15 08:34:23 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦604 |
| 179887088 (Comments: 1) | spauldinglaal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 08:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 174456145 (Comments: 1) | Bing-Student (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why do you draw footway on a building outline? They need to be distinct commented 2026-03-15 08:28:50 UTC by kucai ♦113 |
| 179886897 (Comments: 1) | Azian94 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 08:24:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179846255 (Comments: 1) | Hallie Masseba (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hoi., bicycle=no is de default. Je hoeft dat niet toe te voegen. Wiki access=no bus=designated emergency=yes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway MVG eggie commented 2026-03-15 08:14:05 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179864473 (Comments: 2) | Jurrt (Discussed changesets: 2) | building (bunker) added Please comment your edits properly. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-03-15 08:11:25 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179862917 (Comments: 2) | rjm05 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Naam van de hospice verplaatst naar adresnode 199 conform website commented 2026-03-15 08:06:54 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 177435563 (Comments: 3) | diacriticalhit (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted but we can discuss this on the forum or Slack if you feel the national guidelines need to be revised from a minimum of 2 miles upward to 6 miles. commented 2026-03-15 08:03:17 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦604 |
| 179843541 (Comments: 4) | Y0ga (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh perfect, Thanks for your time and help! commented 2026-03-15 08:01:05 UTC by Y0ga ♦1 |
| 179876044 (Comments: 1) | onthegomap (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for spotting and fixing that, I missed it when I removed the access restrictions from the path. commented 2026-03-15 08:00:24 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,789 |
| 179878174 (Comments: 1) | Jasbeer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Dat klopt inderdaad. Het deel voor de brug heeft een uitzondering voor fietsers. .. oneway:bicycle=no Dat het ik toegevoegd.... commented 2026-03-15 07:46:03 UTC by eggie ♦44,268 |
| 179869488 (Comments: 1) | banderas191 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, a parte de que la normativa sigue prohibiendo el paso de bicicletas por senderos estrechos, por las lineas eléctricas imagino que tampoco se puede, aunque ya me espero cualquier cosa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178127610/history... commented 2026-03-15 07:37:56 UTC by aTarom ♦919 |
| 179550014 (Comments: 1) | jioele (Discussed changesets: 15) | Attenzione,tower:costruction=* e material=* sono due cose diverse. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:construction?uselang=hr commented 2026-03-15 07:30:57 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦342 |
| 179884961 (Comments: 1) | kun1111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 请直接在原施工道路的元素修改，并将两段道路交接的两头对准 commented 2026-03-15 07:20:22 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦38 |
| 179505013 (Comments: 4) | rarad74 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Salut. Nu e chiar asa. Cica dupa o cautare pe goog;e: " Drumuri private deschise circulației publice: Dacă un drum este privat (ex: parcarea unui supermarket, drumul de acces într-un complex rezidențial neîngrădit), dar este a... commented 2026-03-15 07:18:53 UTC by rarad74 ♦441 |
| 179864179 (Comments: 3) | Piene (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Piene Danke fürs korrigieren. Bei einer seperat eingezeichneten Rad-/Fußweg-Linie wie hier, ist eine Benutzung in beide Richtungen default also Standartannahme (für Router). Deshalb muß NICHT zusätzlich ein o... commented 2026-03-15 06:55:19 UTC by kre777 ♦17 |
| 179883910 (Comments: 1) | Darnight14 (Discussed changesets: 11) | 这啥渲染 名字怎么跑到康体场地中心了== commented 2026-03-15 06:40:17 UTC by Darnight14 ♦8 |
| 179565771 (Comments: 2) | asibwene (Discussed changesets: 3) | already solved commented 2026-03-15 05:57:10 UTC by asibwene ♦2 |
| 179883931 (Comments: 1) | abup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-15 05:48:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,356 |
| 179458285 (Comments: 2) | elsa49 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179476772 https://osm.org/changeset/179573892 commented 2026-03-15 05:33:24 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179471626 (Comments: 2) | gulnaaz shaikh (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179800093 commented 2026-03-15 05:33:24 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179469373 (Comments: 2) | textifypic007 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883790 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-15 05:33:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179469858 (Comments: 2) | Le Yacht club basque (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179508293 commented 2026-03-15 05:33:22 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179467462 (Comments: 2) | Canadian Optic and Laser Clinic (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883789 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-15 05:33:21 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179466402 (Comments: 2) | LifeEssentialsTampa (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179466815 commented 2026-03-15 05:33:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179464589 (Comments: 2) | 500374242 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883785 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-15 05:33:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179464164 (Comments: 2) | 500367635 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883784 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-15 05:33:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179463354 (Comments: 2) | 500382435 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883783 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-15 05:33:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179463073 (Comments: 2) | 500380979 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883781 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-15 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179463167 (Comments: 2) | 500382490 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883782 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-15 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179462863 (Comments: 2) | 500382246 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883779 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-15 05:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179462732 (Comments: 2) | 500381164 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883778 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-15 05:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179459288 (Comments: 2) | 500379396 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883777 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-15 05:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179457518 (Comments: 2) | RifatYATKIN (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179458402 commented 2026-03-15 05:33:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179457420 (Comments: 2) | RifatYATKIN (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179458407 commented 2026-03-15 05:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,274 |
| 179456850 (Comments: 2) | Febdayanti (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883774 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-15 05:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,457 |
| 179598899 (Comments: 2) | Trần Thanh Tuấn (Discussed changesets: 27) | I’ll fix this sometime soon. commented 2026-03-15 05:03:42 UTC by Trần Thanh Tuấn ♦17 |
| 179849755 (Comments: 2) | RemiHou (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merci pour la précision. La modification a été effectuée. commented 2026-03-15 05:01:44 UTC by RemiHou ♦1 |