| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 175002917 (Comments: 4) | mustmiekieke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey wat vreemd, ik dacht dat ik ze had verwijderd maar ik heb het kennelijk niet opgeslagen. Bedankt voor 't bijwerken eggie :) commented 2025-11-24 10:05:17 UTC by mustmiekieke ♦1 |
 | 172400365 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 15) | revert edit done without proper explanation, undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed ideas https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1750590... commented 2025-11-24 10:02:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 172447478 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 15) | revert edit done without proper explanation, undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed ideas https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1750589... commented 2025-11-24 09:59:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 174006574 (Comments: 4) | Coelian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ich glaube das fällt unter temporäre Features. Im Normalfall mappt man nur, was auch wirklich für längere Zeit besteht oder bestehen wird. Mal ganz abgesehen davon, dass Campingplatz ziemlich sicher nicht der richtige Tag ist ;) -... commented 2025-11-24 09:59:09 UTC by vikiawv ♦27 |
| 172447750 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 15) | revert edit done without proper explanation, undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed ideas https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1750589... commented 2025-11-24 09:59:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 172493467 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 15) | revert edit done without proper explanation, undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed ideas https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1750589... commented 2025-11-24 09:58:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 172493620 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 15) | revert edit done without proper explanation, undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed ideas https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1750589... commented 2025-11-24 09:58:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 172493654 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 15) | revert edit done without proper explanation, undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed ideas https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1750588... commented 2025-11-24 09:58:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 175058670 (Comments: 1) | pitfire (Discussed changesets: 40) | Changed description>Missing pedestrian crossing without road markings commented 2025-11-24 09:56:47 UTC by pitfire ♦705 |
| 173967899 (Comments: 2) | Schramme (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hallo, das war mein Fehler. Ich habe die Route auf dem Gehweg übersehen und soeben geändert. Jetzt sollte es passen: https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=11928450&noCache=true&_noCache=on Danke für den Hinwe... commented 2025-11-24 09:56:24 UTC by Schramme ♦33 |
 | 175045883 (Comments: 5) | ceirios (Discussed changesets: 17) | REFINE THE FIRE PIT commented 2025-11-24 09:47:22 UTC by spughetti_tomtom ♦13 |
 | 175037702 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 19) | Neúplná adresa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230310584/history commented 2025-11-24 09:46:22 UTC by Dodko ♦1,268 |
 | 175058193 (Comments: 2) | PCBuildz (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Custom PC builder in Bangalore" commented 2025-11-24 09:42:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
 | 173815236 (Comments: 1) | olo81 (Discussed changesets: 101) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445304211/history - leisure=park tu błędne jest, to zagroda zwierząt a nie osobny park commented 2025-11-24 09:38:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 131523616 (Comments: 2) | David_RF (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.google.com/maps/place/Borne+de+recharge+Fastned/@49.072342,4.78871,3a,77.5y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipNhgRBPYtvX7PRwfcn6ohjvd9HorbnmClE6Q9W3!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh3.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipNhgRBPYtvX7PRwfcn6ohjvd9HorbnmC... commented 2025-11-24 09:37:37 UTC by David_RF ♦4 |
| 174021591 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 09:35:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 174154580 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 09:34:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 174155209 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 09:34:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 175057724 (Comments: 2) | BeDazzle My Events (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Event planning company in Chino CA" commented 2025-11-24 09:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
 | 174636189 (Comments: 3) | wavewings (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ok, thanks, just checking commented 2025-11-24 09:30:37 UTC by PubUpdater ♦10 |
| 174990199 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 19) | Tu tiež chýba addr:place=Bošianska Neporadza https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175057233 commented 2025-11-24 09:27:39 UTC by Dodko ♦1,268 |
| 174991751 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ak obec nemá pomenovanie ulíc treba vyplniť aj addr:place v tomto prípade addr:place=Újazd commented 2025-11-24 09:25:17 UTC by Dodko ♦1,268 |
 | 174917825 (Comments: 1) | KangtoMountain (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there, I think this section of road should be highway=trunk, according to the expressway limit sign based on ground truth. commented 2025-11-24 09:24:19 UTC by Zh9567 ♦18 |
| 97075997 (Comments: 1) | hybridOL (Discussed changesets: 21) | Moin! Auf einem Foto vom 21.11.2025 sehe ich an dieser Stelle https://www.osm.org/node/8298479155 weder eine Haltestelle noch das ehem. vorhandene Wartehäuschen. Ist die Haltestelle evtl. verlegt worden? Sitzbank und Straßenlampe waren ... commented 2025-11-24 09:23:20 UTC by GerdP ♦2,789 |
 | 175030823 (Comments: 1) | LateNightTone (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi LateNightTone - great to get more accuracy in the Grand Central Station layout, but your edit seems to have broken the relations of a few bus routes (215, 216, ...) - the OSM Inspector validator is complaining (see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/... commented 2025-11-24 09:15:26 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦68 |
| 174954809 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 19) | Domy treba kresliť rovno a nie len tak ledabolo krivo. Zarovnať do pravého uhla skratkou Q. commented 2025-11-24 09:13:24 UTC by Dodko ♦1,268 |
| 175038077 (Comments: 2) | JagnaZetkky (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok commented 2025-11-24 09:11:54 UTC by JagnaZetkky ♦1 |
| 175057023 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 113) | Oraz kilka poprawek. commented 2025-11-24 09:10:39 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
| 174939128 (Comments: 3) | Anna-sw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zgłosiłem prośbę o zmiany w Wikipedii na Discordzie ale raczej przeszło bez echa. Jako, że mam konto na Wikipedii to znalazłem odnośnik do zgłaszania błędów w artykule więc w wolnej chwili wykonam tam zgłoszenie. Niest... commented 2025-11-24 09:03:48 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦571 |
| 161390216 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:58:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 161390468 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:58:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 161390654 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:58:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 175047509 (Comments: 1) | David Reik (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi David, I think this is not correct. Those trails are not marked as a route in the terrain. This just creates confusion for users. commented 2025-11-24 08:57:40 UTC by Mashin ♦583 |
| 161390736 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:57:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 161390882 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:56:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 162306494 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | Skąd info że ten kanał jest rzeką? commented 2025-11-24 08:55:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 161391410 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:53:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 175006399 (Comments: 3) | CAM-Gerlach (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks, just fixing my own mistake :) I'd broken it a few changesets before in #174938202 https://osmcha.org/changesets/174938202 while splitting up a landuse multipolygon into finer chunks, and somehow missed that the VT boundary also used the ... commented 2025-11-24 08:50:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦53 |
| 161391658 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:50:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 175056142 (Comments: 1) | snptheoldsiam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-24 08:48:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175039461 (Comments: 1) | morissa14 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Czemu w tej edycji skasowane zostały linie dróg? http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=175039461 commented 2025-11-24 08:45:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 161392814 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:44:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 173449069 (Comments: 1) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 44) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19727108 - mogę poprosić o bardziej konkretne źródło niż "materiały GDDKiA"? commented 2025-11-24 08:43:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 175055885 (Comments: 1) | KellyPruitt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-24 08:42:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 161392931 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:42:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 161430058 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:41:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 175045698 (Comments: 1) | Daniel1254 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Daniel, I believe that this changeset broke something because the Seville relation can't be found on Nominatim anymore. Could you please double check? https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=342563 commented 2025-11-24 08:41:07 UTC by vricciardulli ♦25 |
| 161465492 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 receoved no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:40:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 161466723 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 receoved no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:40:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 175055188 (Comments: 2) | salee3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted, user block in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18998 commented 2025-11-24 08:37:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,485 |
| 175037870 (Comments: 1) | anszejek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, jeśli zmieniasz highway=proposed na highway=construction, to trzeba też zmienić proposed=motorway na construction=motorway. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-11-24 08:33:49 UTC by YomanNH ♦402 |
| 161824804 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 receoved no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:32:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 161606829 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 216) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 receoved no answer ... commented 2025-11-24 08:32:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 175040564 (Comments: 1) | GreekMountains (Discussed changesets: 2) | I'd say erosion. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175040564 commented 2025-11-24 08:28:45 UTC by ika-chan! ♦304 |
 | 175042127 (Comments: 1) | Hugo_Ball (Discussed changesets: 7) | merged into duplicate: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11361646737 commented 2025-11-24 08:24:52 UTC by yelisey90 ♦199 |
| 122459182 (Comments: 1) | AutumnLaw (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9822430241/history - what not:name means? have you wanted to express that it has no name? commented 2025-11-24 08:20:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 169306691 (Comments: 2) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 120) | Hallo dooley, hier ist der Aldi einstöckig erbaut und darauf befinden sich die drei Häuser. Das habe ich mir nicht ausgedacht, sondern vor Ort so gesehen. Grüße, Jens commented 2025-11-24 08:10:08 UTC by Scout Jens ♦283 |
 | 174985951 (Comments: 1) | OneWheelMapper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Separat markeret cykelsti på Thorvaldsensgade er ikke blevet tilbageført til eksisterende vejprofil som det burde være. Du er kun halvt i mål her:) Når du tilbagefører cycleways til vejprofilen bør du fjer... commented 2025-11-24 08:07:21 UTC by kortgodt ♦113 |
 | 175002422 (Comments: 1) | drittel-matzos (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao drittel-matzos Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Du hast hier auf dem Gebäude-Umriss die Addressdaten von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/323010... commented 2025-11-24 08:05:18 UTC by habi ♦1,969 |
| 175017531 (Comments: 1) | Geo Dät (Discussed changesets: 32) | re https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5049085 > Sorry, you are right: I only looked after the inputs at "Felder" and did not pull down "Eigenschaften". IMO, software should exclude such contradictions. https://git... commented 2025-11-24 08:05:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 172244255 (Comments: 3) | TornadoFang (Discussed changesets: 9) | Moin, leider nein - erneut verlängert bis 16.12. Hab ich im Blick ......... commented 2025-11-24 08:05:03 UTC by werbuli ♦11 |
| 175045723 (Comments: 4) | Stevnets (Discussed changesets: 1) | De Eikensingel is wellicht nog niet definitief af. Ik heb van je footway even een highway=service gemaakt anders kunnen bewoners hun oprit niet gebruiken. Denk dat het de bedoeling is dat die fietsverbindingen anders worden ingericht. Een b... commented 2025-11-24 08:02:43 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174986054 (Comments: 2) | OneWheelMapper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Godt spottet, det er fikset commented 2025-11-24 08:00:09 UTC by OneWheelMapper ♦7 |
| 124176191 (Comments: 2) | Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hallo! Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich habe die Linie korrigiert. osm.org/changeset/175054662 commented 2025-11-24 07:59:43 UTC by Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz ♦45 |
| X | 174836415 (Comments: 3) | birdcall (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is an interpretation of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#Naming, as well as looking at other bilingual countries' names in OSM (e.g. Switzerland and Belgi... commented 2025-11-24 07:58:37 UTC by lcmortensen ♦53 |
| 151846702 (Comments: 1) | cartoleo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, Le format à utiliser pour les numéros de téléphone est du type +33 6 13 17 33 97 et non pas +0613173397 Merci d'y penser pour les prochaines contributions ! commented 2025-11-24 07:57:54 UTC by cquest ♦275 |
| 173448756 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 557) | a, i poprawiłem to foo commented 2025-11-24 07:57:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 175047889 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Ich habe gerade auf den latest OSM Edits (https://rene78.github.io/) gesehen, dass du die Spiegelgasse und die Münstergasse mit einer Treppe an der Limmat verknüft hast. War das absicht? commented 2025-11-24 07:47:51 UTC by North66 ♦5 |
| 175013124 (Comments: 1) | Vamsi8096 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Some of your footways are placed on top of existing highways, creating duplication that could disrupt routing. Thus, the warnings above about crossing highways. Could you please correct these problems? Need any... commented 2025-11-24 07:46:04 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 175048028 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Ich habe gerade auf den latest OSM Edits (https://rene78.github.io/) gesehen, dass du die Niederdorfstrasse mit dem Lettentunnel verknüft hast. War das absicht? commented 2025-11-24 07:43:59 UTC by North66 ♦5 |
| 175046454 (Comments: 1) | Squarion (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. surface toevoegen is altijd goed. Feedback Zou het een G13 fietspad zijn? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community <... commented 2025-11-24 07:42:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174943431 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 441) | Bonjour, Merci de votre alerte, c'est corrigé Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-11-24 07:42:11 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦266 |
| 175021646 (Comments: 1) | Gowrie1927 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, unfortunately, you've added three highways on top of the original service highway. You also tagged the new highways as bridges. This duplication of highways could disrupt routing. I've removed the duplications and tweaked areas around t... commented 2025-11-24 07:35:10 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
 | 175053754 (Comments: 2) | United Alarm Systems Inc (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Security systems company in Calgary Alberta" commented 2025-11-24 07:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174966610 (Comments: 1) | blot27 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This change has been reverted. Please see previous changeset notes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170753934 for similar edits. commented 2025-11-24 07:23:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦761 |
| 175053104 (Comments: 2) | crazymacattacks (Discussed changesets: 1) | This was intentional. commented 2025-11-24 07:07:43 UTC by crazymacattacks ♦1 |
| 174542959 (Comments: 2) | PedestrianMapping_MapPhantom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for pointing that out! I’ll make sure to handle relations more carefully going forward. Thanks again! commented 2025-11-24 07:03:56 UTC by PedestrianMapping_MapPhantom ♦1 |
| 174579120 (Comments: 12) | njberks (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ah yes, Chad's Tool. The OSM community has had a lot of run-ins with people using Chad's Tool and wanting to break how OSM does mapping. Chad's Tool has a bug in that it doesn't support relations. There is a proposed fix th... commented 2025-11-24 06:59:49 UTC by b-jazz ♦761 |
| 175043291 (Comments: 2) | Churp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175047658 Thanks, Churp commented 2025-11-24 06:52:49 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
 | 175031775 (Comments: 3) | Dippy92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175036970 Thanks, Marco & ivanbranco commented 2025-11-24 06:32:25 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174554915 (Comments: 2) | PedestrianMapping_HiddenRoute (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I will be more careful while editing highways with relations going forward. Thank you. commented 2025-11-24 06:31:08 UTC by PedestrianMapping_HiddenRoute ♦1 |
| 175052392 (Comments: 2) | sitemark (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Telecom site marketing company" commented 2025-11-24 06:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174784387 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 308) | Widzę podjąłeś mój temat z zestawów zmian 146439617 i 171974001. W sumie tak też można jak ty zrobiłeś, ale musiałem koniecznie poprawić parę motorway na primary ze względu na położenie znaków D-7 i D-8 w terenie (z... commented 2025-11-24 06:14:54 UTC by Ziemowit Zabawa ♦34 |
| 174542336 (Comments: 2) | PedestrianMapping_VectorRelay (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Thanks for fixing the data, I will be more careful with relation handling. Thanks again! commented 2025-11-24 06:14:25 UTC by PedestrianMapping_VectorRelay ♦1 |
| 174530307 (Comments: 3) | TagaSanPedroAko (Discussed changesets: 326) | Actually, there hasn't been edits changing the text for the Buses page, but the naming scheme has been already marked as discouraged on the top-level Public transport page. commented 2025-11-24 06:14:24 UTC by TagaSanPedroAko ♦529 |
| 171974001 (Comments: 2) | Ziemowit Zabawa (Discussed changesets: 17) | szalona_entropia przyłączył się do tematu w zestawie zmian 174784387. commented 2025-11-24 06:13:02 UTC by Ziemowit Zabawa ♦34 |
| 141640724 (Comments: 2) | Сергей-Питер (Discussed changesets: 11) | Полигон действующий до сих пор. Правку надо отменить. commented 2025-11-24 05:39:37 UTC by AlexVXVLI ♦3 |
| 141040322 (Comments: 4) | Сергей-Питер (Discussed changesets: 11) | Полигон действует до сих пор. Где официальные документы, что он расформирован? Если по принципу "одна баба сказала" или кому-то, что-... commented 2025-11-24 05:32:43 UTC by AlexVXVLI ♦3 |
 | 172939754 (Comments: 1) | Ricardo Acosta Nassar (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nice commented 2025-11-24 04:59:17 UTC by jaygogetscoin ♦1 |
 | 174706681 (Comments: 1) | Peter Durand (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá. Bem vindo ao OSM. Atenção que usou tags que não se aplicam aqui e criou uma highway fictícia por cima de outra. No OSM só se deve adicionar objetos e vias observáveis no terreno. Para o efe... commented 2025-11-24 04:56:18 UTC by m2fc ♦10 |
| 175050739 (Comments: 1) | Kpx김은수 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-24 04:51:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174352803 (Comments: 2) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175050655 as I didn't recieve a response. commented 2025-11-24 04:51:21 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦126 |
| 174352517 (Comments: 1) | JonnyW03 (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've re-added amenity=parking to these courtyards as the spaces are visible on aerial imagery - unless you have a source showing that they have been removed/repurposed? commented 2025-11-24 04:50:49 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦126 |
| 175050489 (Comments: 2) | aobaethetics (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Aesthetics and wellness center in Newport Beach CA" commented 2025-11-24 04:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175042338 (Comments: 1) | lbrow23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | how did this changeset end up so wide commented 2025-11-24 03:40:18 UTC by dmjab13 ♦44 |
| 175034185 (Comments: 1) | Peter Yang Trails (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Using the name tag to add descriptions is incorrect. Please read the OSM wiki before making more changes to the OSM database. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions commented 2025-11-24 03:24:47 UTC by MassCartog ♦244 |
| 175034104 (Comments: 1) | Peter Yang Trails (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists o... commented 2025-11-24 03:23:17 UTC by MassCartog ♦244 |
| 175029809 (Comments: 1) | mbjh85c (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists o... commented 2025-11-24 03:19:38 UTC by MassCartog ♦244 |
 | 174916139 (Comments: 1) | Juan S Bedoya Arias (Discussed changesets: 1) | Que fuentes utilizó para el cambio de nombre de esa avenida? commented 2025-11-24 03:10:25 UTC by Cafetom ♦13 |
| 175048943 (Comments: 1) | i_map_stuff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Never mind, it is probably a basin. commented 2025-11-24 03:09:49 UTC by i_map_stuff ♦1 |
| 175014788 (Comments: 1) | FHarris3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on... commented 2025-11-24 03:09:04 UTC by MassCartog ♦244 |
| 175014119 (Comments: 1) | FHarris3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2025-11-24 03:01:18 UTC by MassCartog ♦244 |
| 175048254 (Comments: 4) | JeffreyEpstein (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175048599 commented 2025-11-24 02:22:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174074357 (Comments: 1) | FahRadler (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hallo FahRadler! Entschuldige, aber was hast du an der L'Osteria gemacht? Soweit ich mich erinnere, hatte ich das ziemlich sauber gezeichnet (allerdings noch ohne Satellitenbild). Aber jetzt ist das Gebäude hinten nicht mehr rechtwinklig, d... commented 2025-11-24 02:19:04 UTC by goodidea ♦106 |
| 175046793 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 1) | looks like organic maps didn't attach a summary, this is updates for levels primarily commented 2025-11-24 02:04:17 UTC by synthfi ♦4 |
| 175035624 (Comments: 2) | mikoMK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi Fjellrev Da hast du wohl recht. Ich habe die alte Nummer in Netz gefunden und daraufhin die Vorwahl auf +41 geändert. Dies scheint aber tatsächlich eine veraltete Info zu sein. Deine Recherche mit dem Nagelstudio scheint korrekt zu s... commented 2025-11-24 01:57:01 UTC by mikoMK ♦1 |
 | 174980149 (Comments: 2) | Joast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18996 commented 2025-11-24 01:21:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 175007679 (Comments: 3) | dbergv (Discussed changesets: 2) | That is interesting. We just had a short discussion on Slack about it. What I find interesting is that people are using different tools to contribute. Everydoor is the most common, then Streetcomplete and one person even used GoMap!! commented 2025-11-24 01:20:43 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 175010673 (Comments: 1) | dbergv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Not sure if I did this correctly. The restaurant had a sign in the window saying they were closing down, so I removed the entry. If there is a better way to describe closed businesses, I'd be interested in hearing about it. commented 2025-11-24 01:16:52 UTC by dbergv ♦2 |
| 174995132 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18995 commented 2025-11-24 01:09:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
 | 175020481 (Comments: 2) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | This has been reverted in changeset 175047539 commented 2025-11-24 01:08:06 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦142 |
 | 174999659 (Comments: 5) | DogdaDoge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Really, unless you know for absolute certainty that their licence is OK for us to use, it's safest to never copy off any other map, & only map by available imagery, or direct, on-the-ground, observation. commented 2025-11-24 00:58:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 175007545 (Comments: 1) | punkfairie (Discussed changesets: 2) | It is nice to add a brief changeset comment, such as "added opening hours" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175007545 commented 2025-11-24 00:54:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 175035025 (Comments: 1) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | When drawing outlines that should have 90-degree corners, you can use the "square corners" button in the editor (q) to prettify the areas. commented 2025-11-24 00:49:19 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦142 |
 | 171432740 (Comments: 2) | rooffeel (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG reference 2025112410000011 — user / rooffeel commented 2025-11-24 00:26:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
 | 136249542 (Comments: 3) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 32) | Partly cleaned up in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175046936 (focus on BE-VLI) commented 2025-11-24 00:25:43 UTC by abs8_josm ♦4 |
| 174935683 (Comments: 1) | madkatjack (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, on all your edits I've had to remove aerialway=chair_lift as this can only be applied to chair lifts that have completed construction and are open. If you want these proposed lifts to appear on skimaps.org/openskimap.org, it's up to the... commented 2025-11-24 00:25:08 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦126 |
 | 172512002 (Comments: 1) | ralley (Discussed changesets: 41) | Heya! No need to add no exits to the end of a driveway, you can usually just connect the driveway straight to the house, and if you know there's a garage there, you can add a garage area (landuse=garages) :) commented 2025-11-24 00:21:44 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦6 |
| 171358817 (Comments: 1) | rooffeel (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175046808 commented 2025-11-24 00:14:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 171411199 (Comments: 1) | rooffeel (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175046808 commented 2025-11-24 00:14:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 136249267 (Comments: 1) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 32) | Adding addr:country and addr:province is not needed. These tags should only go on buildings. Perhaps residential zones. But not administrative boundaries. It not only has no effect but it is totally abundant. regards commented 2025-11-24 00:12:05 UTC by abs8_josm ♦4 |
| 175046397 (Comments: 1) | shagsterz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I've corrected the changes you just made - for cameras mounted on poles you should have added the tag camera:mount=pole instead of changing the existing camera:type=fixed tag. Also it was not correct to click 'Tag as not the same operat... commented 2025-11-24 00:09:05 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦126 |
| 167567656 (Comments: 1) | tttttajbor (Discussed changesets: 1) | It is OK, if you want to outline the thickest part of the building, but it must be positioned where it is on the ground (or where it vertically projects onto the ground), not where its roof is shown on the aerial imagery, which is taken a bit from th... commented 2025-11-24 00:02:28 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 172372482 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset incorrectly connected elements on different layers together, for example the Brightline flyover over Blue Diamond road, where nonexistent railway=crossing nodes were also added. I've tried to correct all of these, but it's ha... commented 2025-11-23 23:55:49 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦126 |
| 175038435 (Comments: 1) | Waaslander (Discussed changesets: 45) | Bedankt om deze deelgemeente te vervolledigen. Tevens wil ik je er graag op wijzen dat de tags addr:country en andere addr:* tags op een boundary zoals deze totaal overbodig zijn. Je hoeft deze niet toe te voegen. mvg commented 2025-11-23 23:54:28 UTC by kabelhaai ♦61 |
| 174796274 (Comments: 1) | KnuFloh001 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi KnuFloh! Du hast bei einigen Objekten aus highway=bus_stop highway=stop gemacht. Das ist nicht so ganz korrekt, weil highway=stop ein Stoppschild meint. :D Das ist mir aufgefallen, weil ich gerade eine MR-Challenge bearbeite, wo man die ... commented 2025-11-23 23:45:15 UTC by wielandb ♦138 |
| 175045329 (Comments: 1) | Simi112 (Discussed changesets: 4) | oh das das noch als Feuerwehr eingetragen ist obwohl die Feuerwehr seit Jahren von dort garnicht mehr ausrückt da die Stadt Bad Wimpfen nur eine feuerwehr hat wo nur eine aktive wache im steinweg hat wovon alle mitglieder aus der feuerwehr bad w... commented 2025-11-23 23:38:41 UTC by Simi112112 ♦2 |
| 175045805 (Comments: 1) | Simi112 (Discussed changesets: 4) | das stimmt was er geändert hat wohne da in der nähe schon länger commented 2025-11-23 23:32:11 UTC by Simi112112 ♦2 |
| 175043297 (Comments: 1) | Inspectorchallenger (Discussed changesets: 6) | this adds a duplicate alpr commented 2025-11-23 23:29:32 UTC by Udarian ♦528 |
| 174776665 (Comments: 2) | Mashin (Discussed changesets: 41) | Sorry, I haven't inspected the changeset properly. commented 2025-11-23 23:22:23 UTC by Mashin ♦583 |
| 174850160 (Comments: 2) | KöWiMM (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hallo Hauke, die Bänke sind nicht neu, ich habe nur ihre Position korrigiert. Sie stehen auf einem Plateau oberhalb des Baches. Ich habe einen zusätzlichen Pfad über das Plateau an den Bänken vorbei gezeichnet. Ein paar Meter &... commented 2025-11-23 23:04:04 UTC by KöWiMM ♦15 |
| 174078216 (Comments: 1) | Mariusz Dykierek (Discussed changesets: 43) | Dlaczego zmieniłeś nazwę na zapisaną w całości wielkimi literami? Lux Med to nie jest skrót ani skrótowiec. commented 2025-11-23 22:58:26 UTC by uprkos ♦65 |
| 175045398 (Comments: 3) | josepmh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Fabricadores de horchata natural y granizados" --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-11-23 22:57:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175044954 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 422) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-11-23 22:51:19 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 175036729 (Comments: 1) | Walleyflock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Walley, this camera is not present on relatively recent streetview imagery. 300 North is also a city owned road, so I would not expect to see a UDOT motorola on it. Can you confirm this was surveyed and is not just a test? commented 2025-11-23 22:49:06 UTC by HashFerret ♦9 |
 | 175037139 (Comments: 1) | Hexalogical (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. No agregamos estudios como proposed. De hecho, v, como comunidad, hace poco comenzamos a eliminar elementos con este tag que llevaban décadas en OSM y no se concretaron. Proposed es cuando está en la fase previa a la construcci&oa... commented 2025-11-23 22:45:54 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,598 |
| 175044419 (Comments: 1) | krieger2408 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur eine echte Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13327119495: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. ... commented 2025-11-23 22:45:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 171328959 (Comments: 1) | Lauch227 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, vor einer Änderung, die „offensichtlich“ erscheint, hilft es, einmal in die Historie eines Objekts zu schauen. In diesem Fall sieht man hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140669527, dass jemand schon einmal die... commented 2025-11-23 22:36:41 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 175009452 (Comments: 2) | Ink Stories by Rita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected commented 2025-11-23 22:34:30 UTC by topolusitania ♦226 |
| 167754301 (Comments: 3) | Stone_X (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tylko w czym miało by pom pomóc komuś zostawienie tych tagów? Przecież każda aplikacja w telefonie czy nawigacja pokazuje ci aktualną pozycję. Też nawiguje wedle życzenia. commented 2025-11-23 22:10:46 UTC by olo81 ♦691 |
 | 155530230 (Comments: 1) | Erelen (Discussed changesets: 23) | Molba za proveru i korekciju. Navigacija mi je za polukružno kod SNP-a iz pravca Šafarikove, nazad ka Šafarikovoj pokazla da se prestrojim u skroz desnu traku ka Jevrejskoj i tamo polukružno ka SNP-i. Nije zgodno za nekog ko n... commented 2025-11-23 21:58:03 UTC by FiveWho ♦7 |
| 43006178 (Comments: 1) | aghlu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Naozaj sa toto pieskovisko vola Toropark? Prijde mi to nepravdepodobne... commented 2025-11-23 21:54:41 UTC by ticho2 ♦24 |
 | 173785478 (Comments: 1) | archie (Discussed changesets: 289) | Hi, just a heads-up it looks like something went wrong in this changeset. There are untagged nodes at the corners of the buildings but no ways are present. commented 2025-11-23 21:51:54 UTC by Mapiate ♦31 |
| 174989464 (Comments: 1) | andmio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj, skąd informacje odnośnie takiej numeracji? W oficjalnym źródle widnieje poprzednia numeracja commented 2025-11-23 21:51:22 UTC by bartgron ♦333 |
| 174962990 (Comments: 14) | Rclinic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Miłej nocy :) commented 2025-11-23 21:50:38 UTC by bartgron ♦333 |
| 175038657 (Comments: 1) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Aangepast naar kapper commented 2025-11-23 21:40:33 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174827338 (Comments: 1) | AbtBremagrten (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, auch hier gelten die Anmerkungen der vorherigen Changesets. Auf Grund des Alters der Daten - wenn denn survey:date stimmt - hoffe ich, dass die Daten eigenständig erhoben wurden und es sich nicht um einen Import handelt, vgl. https... commented 2025-11-23 21:37:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174824495 (Comments: 1) | AbtBremagrten (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, zu dieser Bearbeitung folgende Anmerkungen: - Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key... commented 2025-11-23 21:31:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174821592 (Comments: 1) | AbtBremagrten (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Bei dieser Bearbeitung ist etwas schief gelaufen. Neun Hydranten liegen auf dem gleichen Punkt. Acht Stück wären also wieder zu löschen. Bei dem, der dann übrig bleibt, m&u... commented 2025-11-23 21:23:59 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 175003968 (Comments: 2) | mapmyplanet (Discussed changesets: 4) | GIS_Acres came from the PADUS4_1_StatePA.gdb dataset - total acreage PA:DIVISION=COUNTY & LOCAL PARKS was in the tags for previous outline of the park - didn't want to lose it if it has purpose in a local convention. commented 2025-11-23 21:08:18 UTC by mapmyplanet ♦1 |
| 175019352 (Comments: 2) | tastrax (Discussed changesets: 34) | My edit was simply an update of state. Feel free to correct any bitcoin errors. commented 2025-11-23 21:04:22 UTC by tastrax ♦1,177 |
 | 171805274 (Comments: 3) | anderfo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Anyway, feel free to change whatever you find that looks wrong. commented 2025-11-23 21:03:46 UTC by anderfo ♦119 |
 | 174784688 (Comments: 4) | stan_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | The name of the stations are treated inconsistently in the official documents, sometimes with "Estación" included and sometimes not, for the same station. For homogenity, we went with always including "Estación". commented 2025-11-23 20:59:41 UTC by Ferrocarriles de México ♦56 |
| 163321255 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thank you for trying to fix building problems. However, shifting all the building parts was unnecessary to solve the problem. Do not touch buildings with source=kapor2 or source=ZBGIS if you do not use that source to cross-check your changes. commented 2025-11-23 20:58:19 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 175039627 (Comments: 1) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ресторан ”Грофов мерак” налази се на излазу из Српске Црње, уз саму границу са суседном Румунијом. Оно што је специфично за овај рес... commented 2025-11-23 20:56:42 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦8 |
| 175038294 (Comments: 1) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Beste, Maar dan is dit toch geen kledingzaak? MVG eggie commented 2025-11-23 20:56:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 163323191 (Comments: 1) | melody_Tej (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, what intersection are you fixing here? It seems there was just a node needed to connect the building parts together. The shifting of the buildings was totally unnecessary and incorrect, they were sourced from the Slovak cadastre and were c... commented 2025-11-23 20:54:25 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 175038482 (Comments: 2) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | DA tagging verwijderd en aangepast naar dentist commented 2025-11-23 20:53:10 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174456211 (Comments: 3) | Vaïnamoïnen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bien vu ! C'est le cas de le dire. Je crois que dans ce cas quelqu'un avait suggéré de marquer half (plus ou moins en blaguant, car peu utile pour le routage des mal voyants, mais utile pour savoir le pourquoi et évi... commented 2025-11-23 20:41:32 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 171684533 (Comments: 1) | SomeRailfan (Discussed changesets: 4) | please don't blindly move the `place=*` tag to `border_type=*`, they require more nuance. in quebec, there are no towns per say, only cities (ville). And Quarters should most likely be borough, or neighbourghood according to its admini... commented 2025-11-23 20:26:50 UTC by wolfy1339 ♦37 |
 | 175040228 (Comments: 1) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Also deleted many nonexistant buildings commented 2025-11-23 20:13:00 UTC by Tomas09 ♦55 |
| 131986382 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 20) | This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174973672. commented 2025-11-23 20:06:25 UTC by Frank Peng ♦38 |
| 174923859 (Comments: 4) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 343) | In principe taggen we 'ground truth', dus 1. Aspecten 2 (routering) en 3 (kaartrendering) worden grotendeels door 3e partijen gedaan. Vanuit Openstreetmap is het belangrijk dat er een goede database is om dat mogelijk te maken. De ke... commented 2025-11-23 20:06:23 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,024 |
| 116505080 (Comments: 2) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 151) | https://www.putten.nl/Cultuur_Erfgoed/Kunstwerken_in_Putten/Het_zwaartepunt_van_Nederland commented 2025-11-23 19:58:39 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,822 |
| 174785112 (Comments: 1) | stan_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | These edits are wrong. These stations are already correctly tagged. We do not put `building=station` on the outline of the station plot. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175040216 commented 2025-11-23 19:57:58 UTC by Ferrocarriles de México ♦56 |
| 174784899 (Comments: 1) | stan_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | These edits are wrong. These stations are already correctly tagged. We do not put `building=station` on the outline of the station plot. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175040216 commented 2025-11-23 19:57:57 UTC by Ferrocarriles de México ♦56 |
| 174324591 (Comments: 2) | geert1956 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Eigenlijk is Jeroen vd Gun de mapper die de source gebruikte... commented 2025-11-23 19:57:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,822 |
| 175036209 (Comments: 1) | Fly Dreams (Discussed changesets: 3) | on the aerial imagery this is inside of the road area, please check and fix its position. commented 2025-11-23 19:49:49 UTC by Udarian ♦528 |
 | 175039664 (Comments: 1) | mervendo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 19:45:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 165386794 (Comments: 1) | Trail_Caretaker (Discussed changesets: 36) | Why was the Challenger path marked one way? I haven't seen that before. commented 2025-11-23 19:26:05 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦86 |
| 175025600 (Comments: 1) | Nail Bar Tbilisi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Name tags shouldn't include the type of business unless it's an inseparable part of the naming. სილამაზის სტუდია - type of business, which was described by shop=beauty commented 2025-11-23 19:22:42 UTC by empty_child ♦363 |
 | 175038792 (Comments: 1) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 48) | "roof:shape=gabledq"* commented 2025-11-23 19:15:44 UTC by Tomas09 ♦55 |
 | 173117145 (Comments: 1) | Alvarado2510 (Discussed changesets: 313) | Why are many of these buildings multipolygons? commented 2025-11-23 19:13:10 UTC by Tomas09 ♦55 |
| 172705180 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 11) | Jakie jest źródło tych wszystkich nazw? commented 2025-11-23 19:10:52 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦798 |
| 175026125 (Comments: 5) | Dadao34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | On an computer typ CTRL-F5 to empty yout cache. Than you will see the difference. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-11-23 19:05:42 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 175037313 (Comments: 1) | JassKurn (Discussed changesets: 53) | I reverted this changset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175038462 commented 2025-11-23 19:05:10 UTC by JassKurn ♦168 |
| 175037602 (Comments: 1) | JassKurn (Discussed changesets: 53) | I reverted this changset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175038462 commented 2025-11-23 19:05:10 UTC by JassKurn ♦168 |
| 175037207 (Comments: 1) | JassKurn (Discussed changesets: 53) | I reverted this changset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175038462 commented 2025-11-23 19:05:09 UTC by JassKurn ♦168 |
| 175037690 (Comments: 1) | KrzysiekS11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdjęcia i linki nie działają commented 2025-11-23 18:58:37 UTC by Bartek444 ♦29 |
| 175037832 (Comments: 2) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Aangepast naar kitchen commented 2025-11-23 18:54:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 131373481 (Comments: 1) | 915 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, ich bearbeite gerade die Landflächen in der Gegend (meine Herkunftsregion) und ich bin über diesen "Hügel" gestolpert. Woher stammt die Information über seine Existenz und Relevanz? Die referenzierte Wikimediaseite s... commented 2025-11-23 18:51:16 UTC by Halfix ♦26 |
| 175036590 (Comments: 1) | Marcel_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Marcel Ik zie dat de naam Ridderoordsche Bosschen ook nog steeds gehanteerd wordt. Wanneer dit ooit aangepast is dan zou je old_name= kunnen gebruiken naast name= Wanneer er een gangbare naam is, maar ook een officiële naam dan he... commented 2025-11-23 18:50:39 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174905480 (Comments: 1) | NorthOfEnglandMaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | I'm not clear why wikidata:brand = Q37158 was changed to not:wikidata:brand This is the brand:wikidata used to identify Starbucks locations, for example, in this tool: https://osm.mathmos.net/chains/Q37158/ commented 2025-11-23 18:45:22 UTC by phodgkin ♦70 |
| 175037299 (Comments: 1) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dag R vanBaalen.. Nu komt nummer 10 2x voor en is nr 12 verdwenen. Je kunt het beste dan de info op je juiste adresnode plaatsen. Adrtes nr 12 heb ik hersteld. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-23 18:45:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 175037339 (Comments: 2) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Aangepast... Wanneer dit heel lang gaat duren kun je ook disused:shop=... gebruiken. commented 2025-11-23 18:41:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 175036472 (Comments: 1) | Tauffy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Zou dit gedeelte niet gewoon De Wierde heten en dan operator = Van der Hoevenkliniek. Lijkt me anders verwarring ... commented 2025-11-23 18:37:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 165920801 (Comments: 1) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 67) | i jak, przebudowano ją? commented 2025-11-23 18:17:32 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦798 |
| 175008806 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 19) | I guess `opening_hours=closed "temporary closed for renovation"` would work for temporary closure. If we actually know the expected time span, then it could also be added to opening_hours e.g. `08:00-23:00; 2025 Nov 15-2026 May 15 closed &q... commented 2025-11-23 18:15:24 UTC by cuzi ♦132 |
| 174946301 (Comments: 1) | AdrianLangtry (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, could you check this building? Something went wrong with the irish name tag. commented 2025-11-23 18:05:35 UTC by mueschel ♦6,730 |
| 174942454 (Comments: 2) | sikorka120 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Jest to chodnik służący do dojścia do biurowca, znajduje się na działce, na której jest biurowiec i docelowo chodnik ten służy do dojścia do budynku. Jest możliwość przejścia, znaku zakazu wstępu nie ma. Niemniej jednak chodnik s... commented 2025-11-23 18:01:05 UTC by sikorka120 ♦8 |
| 174436738 (Comments: 2) | C-sinensis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, oui je suis bien francophone ! Merci de vos commentaires. - L'ancien tracé du GR situé trop en hauteur datait d'il y a bien longtemps. Il y a 4 ans j'avais dû essayé de le dép... commented 2025-11-23 17:59:35 UTC by C-sinensis ♦3 |
| 175034472 (Comments: 2) | LeftoverPi (Discussed changesets: 1) | In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. I have checked the mentioned elements and can confi... commented 2025-11-23 17:56:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 175013257 (Comments: 6) | dknelson9876 (Discussed changesets: 9) | I appreciate your candor, but I also feel that your opinion and tone are rude, demeaning and disrespectful. As I have looked over a lot of your “edits” though many appear to be accurate, some, especially where items and labels are removed... commented 2025-11-23 17:54:57 UTC by Daedelus129 ♦1 |
| 175035293 (Comments: 1) | m_p_13 (Discussed changesets: 151) | Ale dlaczego to tak zostało zmienione? Przecież to przywraca nieaktualny stan sprzed przebudowy. Tą zmianę niestety, ale należy wycofać... commented 2025-11-23 17:43:27 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,178 |
 | 150755477 (Comments: 1) | Unpocoloco (Discussed changesets: 7) | I see that you extended the range of Ankarana Reserve. Do you have any source of this extension? Administrative decision? commented 2025-11-23 17:35:13 UTC by Eric S ♦34 |
| 100067241 (Comments: 1) | PureTryOut (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hehoi. Hele oude changeset maar ik zeg het toch even. Voor het 3d mappen van gebouwen met complexe vormen als dit is het beter om dat in ID of JOSM te doen. Nu is op een 3d render het hele gebouw een hoog massief blok inplaats van alleen een stukje. ... commented 2025-11-23 17:26:35 UTC by Tomas09 ♦55 |
 | 173528868 (Comments: 1) | RonaldoFinkMullen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Ronaldo, Welcome to the OpenStreetMap community. We have remove some places and name which you have added because, your edits doesn't respect rules of the community, you can find rules about name here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... commented 2025-11-23 17:21:18 UTC by jbcharron ♦137 |
| 175034962 (Comments: 1) | Gerhard24 (Discussed changesets: 11) | *Chagned: Weitere Eigenschaften zu bestehenden Objekten, Positionen von Ampeln. Deleted: Nicht existierende Treppe. commented 2025-11-23 17:21:02 UTC by Gerhard24 ♦11 |
| 174949406 (Comments: 1) | Tzukino11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pozrite si existujúce pizzérie a podľa toho upravte. Malo by mať značky amenity=restaurant cuisine=pizza tiež sa hodí pridať otváracie hodiny commented 2025-11-23 16:58:14 UTC by Dodko ♦1,268 |
 | 175033825 (Comments: 2) | たかまるくんちゃん (Discussed changesets: 1) | ここはあなたのマップ編集に基づいたコメントの例です：「ベンチを追加」 (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added bench" commented 2025-11-23 16:56:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174941009 (Comments: 1) | Emcard as (Discussed changesets: 1) | Treba pozrieť dokumentáciu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station a existujúce nabíjacie stanice ako sú urobené. K staniciam sa má vyplniť aká je tam z&aac... commented 2025-11-23 16:54:13 UTC by Dodko ♦1,268 |
| 158131137 (Comments: 1) | JohnBradshaw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi JohnBradshaw, I recognise this is an old edit now, but just wondering what the rationale is behind changing mini-roundabouts to full roundabouts due to numbers of incoming/outgoing lanes? I see no mention of this practice on [highway=mini_roundabo... commented 2025-11-23 16:52:18 UTC by LateNightTone ♦54 |
| 174964490 (Comments: 6) | Mrksmlk (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ok, postaram się zerknąć. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-11-23 16:51:50 UTC by Mrksmlk ♦10 |
| 175033795 (Comments: 1) | sarnek (Discussed changesets: 5) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 16:51:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175033865 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 113) | Kształt ogródka po północnej stronie nowej ścieżki z BDOT500 nie odpowiada temu, co jest widoczne na zdjęciach - zalecana lepsza relacja przed odpowiednim mapingiem. To samo od strony Towarowej - za mało zdjęć pokazujących cał... commented 2025-11-23 16:50:15 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
 | 175033507 (Comments: 1) | ahmadmazareisotoodeh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 16:42:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175033031 (Comments: 2) | Martin & Serrano Notary LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Notary public services" commented 2025-11-23 16:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174915534 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM18 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Благодарю за замечание и исправление. Буду внимательнее commented 2025-11-23 16:28:06 UTC by Ozon OSM18 ♦2 |
| 174911026 (Comments: 6) | jopvandijk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lijkt me wel dan. mapse commented 2025-11-23 16:21:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174977735 (Comments: 1) | lakshita palkar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check https://osm.org/note/5065119 commented 2025-11-23 16:06:26 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
| 174970037 (Comments: 4) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 76) | Thanks for the explanation. Abbreviations are generally not a good idea, but unfortunately the discussion does not seem to be completely closed, see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Key:access#electric_vehicles. commented 2025-11-23 15:54:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 175009026 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi kevinmcg, nice work with mapping of buildings here. A tip for better results is to use the "Q" key with a building selected, to square off the hand-drawn corners. It also helps other editors if you include a more accurate descript... commented 2025-11-23 15:52:00 UTC by LateNightTone ♦54 |
| 172743392 (Comments: 3) | EfreetSK (Discussed changesets: 5) | public_transport=platform je akoze nova znacka, ktora nahradza highway=platform, ale vykreslovace ju velmi nepodporuju. Pouziva sa ale na vyjadrenie autobusovej zastavky v relaciach MHD, t.j. je to miesto kde cakaju ludia. Vo Vasom pripade by aj na t... commented 2025-11-23 15:25:31 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
 | 175030562 (Comments: 1) | Tyzna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 15:24:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
 | 173252982 (Comments: 1) | cnvery (Discussed changesets: 39) | 港子國小已經廢校了，請用disused前綴 commented 2025-11-23 15:23:08 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,522 |
| 171840332 (Comments: 1) | PainWithChocolate (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, du hast hier die Kreuzung Steinring/Wittener Straße erweitert. Generell, sollte ein Objekt in der realen Welt durch ein Objekt in OSM dargestellt werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element. Stra... commented 2025-11-23 15:10:58 UTC by Backpfeifenolga ♦9 |
| 73847884 (Comments: 2) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 263) | Das ist nun 6 Jahre her. Da fragst Du sachen ^^ commented 2025-11-23 15:09:51 UTC by ma-rt-in ♦1,757 |
| 175027223 (Comments: 1) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 30) | Wow, das ging schnell. Vielen Dank! commented 2025-11-23 15:09:50 UTC by Strubbl ♦569 |
| 166735311 (Comments: 4) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 62) | Dobry napad. Na Mapillary to v roku 2021 ako schody vyzeralo. Ale uz su tam aj fotky z 1.10.2025 (po Vasej zmene) a tam to vyzera ako sikmy chodnik. Mozno to prestavali. Dakujem, opravim. commented 2025-11-23 15:09:44 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 174664264 (Comments: 2) | _Mathieu_ (Discussed changesets: 62) | Oups, merci pour la correction ! commented 2025-11-23 15:02:30 UTC by _Mathieu_ ♦45 |
| 171580863 (Comments: 1) | _Mathieu_ (Discussed changesets: 62) | Bonjour, Tu as cassé la continuité de l'itinéraire de randonnée "Sentier des Buttes" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2866805 Je corrige. Cordialement, Yves — Groupe OS... commented 2025-11-23 14:50:57 UTC by pyrog ♦378 |
| 174123340 (Comments: 9) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 109) | I think we’re in agreement that the sign applies at the transition point between the shared use section and the pavement. If you really want to push forward an interpretation of bicycle=dismount tagging that means the way it’s on i... commented 2025-11-23 14:36:02 UTC by gurglypipe ♦950 |
| 174475726 (Comments: 1) | MapowiczniAK (Discussed changesets: 6) | Cześć, proszę nie nakładaj na siebie dróg, to nieprawidłowe. Zamiast tego należy przerwać rysowanie odcinka drogi i rysować nowy fragment, albo podzielić. Nie ignoruj tych ostrzeżeń edytora. commented 2025-11-23 14:31:33 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,178 |
| 174964608 (Comments: 2) | Julio Fr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci d'avoir effectué les corrections et c’est noté pour la prochaine fois. commented 2025-11-23 14:28:29 UTC by Julio Fr ♦1 |
 | 174801205 (Comments: 2) | Descartio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174897769 commented 2025-11-23 14:26:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174802662 (Comments: 2) | Rumah Sakit Panti Nirmala (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175028364 where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change" commented 2025-11-23 14:24:57 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 175028160 (Comments: 2) | Aaron Luis (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Heating and plumbing services on Vancouver Island" commented 2025-11-23 14:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174433112 (Comments: 2) | Przemysław69 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175028307 Thanks commented 2025-11-23 14:24:31 UTC by Przemysław69 ♦5 |
| 174819151 (Comments: 3) | Iskra707 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175028310 where the comment is: "Reverting unintended geometry change" commented 2025-11-23 14:23:39 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
 | 174839032 (Comments: 3) | miniautome (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175028266 commented 2025-11-23 14:22:42 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174840770 (Comments: 4) | LuthyReis (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175028241 commented 2025-11-23 14:22:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174820992 (Comments: 2) | B Dogg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174860735 Thanks. commented 2025-11-23 14:21:55 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174847073 (Comments: 3) | Foss General Contractors (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174860513 commented 2025-11-23 14:20:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174847959 (Comments: 3) | mountsdentalcare (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174860180 commented 2025-11-23 14:20:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174848454 (Comments: 2) | Awal Bros Batu Aji (Discussed changesets: 1) | Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174896316 commented 2025-11-23 14:19:55 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174848900 (Comments: 3) | Josh_White (Discussed changesets: 2) | Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174885155 Thanks, Cebderby commented 2025-11-23 14:19:00 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174854729 (Comments: 3) | industrialdemolitionandmetalmanagement (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174859956 commented 2025-11-23 14:17:43 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174852437 (Comments: 2) | Mahtab Amini (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175028017 where the comment is: "Reverting unintended geometry change" commented 2025-11-23 14:16:54 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174860434 (Comments: 4) | houstonpoolrenovations (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174876989 Thanks, user_5359 commented 2025-11-23 14:15:50 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174861136 (Comments: 4) | MT Home Remodeling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174877188 commented 2025-11-23 14:15:19 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174877235 (Comments: 3) | 500372347 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175027905 commented 2025-11-23 14:14:46 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174882403 (Comments: 3) | 500372570 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175027895 commented 2025-11-23 14:14:22 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174882608 (Comments: 3) | Nacho Torres Saiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174882923 commented 2025-11-23 14:13:40 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
 | 172796414 (Comments: 5) | Hassan Arara (Discussed changesets: 18) | My source I am colecting form local communities but soon i will be puting my source website online and for boundary use source GADM commented 2025-11-23 14:13:10 UTC by Hassan Arara ♦10 |
| 174891502 (Comments: 3) | Oli Joy Fitness (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174893582 commented 2025-11-23 14:13:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174873651 (Comments: 3) | MSHS26EB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174928536 Thanks, Glassman commented 2025-11-23 14:12:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174874646 (Comments: 2) | tgranes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174909317 commented 2025-11-23 14:11:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
 | 174889444 (Comments: 2) | Macarena Taravilla (Discussed changesets: 2) | Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174892679 commented 2025-11-23 14:10:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174890878 (Comments: 2) | Guntur Tigariawibawa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174934069 commented 2025-11-23 14:09:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174900026 (Comments: 3) | Absolute Painting Power Washing (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174917955 commented 2025-11-23 14:08:44 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174783986 (Comments: 5) | FILszew (Discussed changesets: 2) | @tsinoitisoppo bo wtedy była inna definicja trunka commented 2025-11-23 14:08:32 UTC by FILszew ♦2 |
| 174905261 (Comments: 3) | 24-7 Restoration (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175027584 commented 2025-11-23 14:08:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174912278 (Comments: 3) | Liz McFadyen (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174912618 commented 2025-11-23 14:07:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174910089 (Comments: 2) | WDK Studio (Discussed changesets: 1) | has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174932289 commented 2025-11-23 14:06:28 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174934449 (Comments: 3) | Marnell Masonry (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174937963 commented 2025-11-23 14:05:54 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174932158 (Comments: 2) | khatijam (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175027395 where the comment is: "Revert node dragging" commented 2025-11-23 14:03:43 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174935223 (Comments: 2) | Ruchapong (Discussed changesets: 1) | Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174938539 commented 2025-11-23 14:02:17 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174582209 (Comments: 1) | Paul Fisher (Discussed changesets: 3) | According to the OSM Wiki (“Names” tagging guidelines), the name tag must contain one single name and must not use separators like “;”. If multiple names exist, they should be handled with appropriate tags (e.g., alt_name, loc... commented 2025-11-23 14:00:56 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦127 |
| 174935858 (Comments: 3) | growgreatco (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175027284 commented 2025-11-23 14:00:50 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
 | 174939283 (Comments: 3) | Wadi Rum Desert Secret (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175027244 commented 2025-11-23 14:00:16 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174949138 (Comments: 3) | RoadRunners Coffee Drive Thru (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174956698 commented 2025-11-23 13:59:29 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174646337 (Comments: 2) | Przemysław69 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175027187 Thanks commented 2025-11-23 13:59:26 UTC by Przemysław69 ♦5 |
| 174951395 (Comments: 3) | Danfold Francis (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175027192 commented 2025-11-23 13:59:06 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 164679161 (Comments: 1) | Finance & IT Services (Discussed changesets: 6) | Feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-23 13:56:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 175025271 (Comments: 1) | Finance & IT Services (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag Finance, Probeer de BAG data source en source:date te behouden. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-23 13:54:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 175026692 (Comments: 1) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 303) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13326124999 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-11-23 13:51:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 174827757 (Comments: 2) | Przemysław69 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Solved: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175026776 Thanks commented 2025-11-23 13:50:19 UTC by Przemysław69 ♦5 |
| 174944763 (Comments: 2) | TanishkaBhadale (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175026778 where the changeset comment is: "Revert node dragging" commented 2025-11-23 13:49:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174950134 (Comments: 2) | Blue Heaven (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175026669 where the changeset comment is: "Revert node dragging" commented 2025-11-23 13:47:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174962389 (Comments: 2) | Anushri Deoghare (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175026367 where the changeset comment is: Revert node dragging commented 2025-11-23 13:40:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174684484 (Comments: 2) | Hindediou (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ah mince, j'ai dû me tromper de rue ou bien j'ai été imprécis sur streetcomplete, ce qui m'arrive.. Je supprime l'objet et ouvre l'oeil la prochaine fois que je passe dans le quartier. Merci ... commented 2025-11-23 13:38:56 UTC by Hindediou ♦3 |
| 174865153 (Comments: 2) | Przemysław69 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Solved: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175026244 Thanks commented 2025-11-23 13:38:33 UTC by Przemysław69 ♦5 |
| 175018359 (Comments: 1) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 82) | The validity of this kind of usage of "link" is being discussed here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-a-traversable-area/138357 I may change it in the future commented 2025-11-23 13:33:25 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
 | 175026039 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 47) | Wrong changeset comment, should have been: Update my home province (150 changes) commented 2025-11-23 13:32:46 UTC by Tewuzij ♦27 |
| 135662413 (Comments: 2) | igi77 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Grazie, credo una svista. Correggo. commented 2025-11-23 13:30:07 UTC by igi77 ♦6 |
| 175024959 (Comments: 1) | 0utis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 13:22:56 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175023643 (Comments: 1) | Ivangode8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 13:22:51 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175015421 (Comments: 1) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 82) | Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174980149 commented 2025-11-23 13:22:01 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 175020889 (Comments: 1) | Jeigmz (Discussed changesets: 1) | As a Sydney resident, wanted to say welcome and thanks for your contributions, you're doing great work. Please feel free to join the OpenStreetMap World discord server if you want, there is an active oceania channel with a few other sydneysid... commented 2025-11-23 13:17:32 UTC by radiotrefoil ♦117 |
| 174918059 (Comments: 4) | Cayenne17 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tu demandes au commerçant si son commerce n'est pas déclaré et s'il faut le signaler directement au fisc ? ^ commented 2025-11-23 13:13:41 UTC by trial ♦977 |
 | 175018206 (Comments: 1) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 125) | Those exit exist though, there is no such footway across Fitfort. Also, these exits are in different levels. commented 2025-11-23 13:10:03 UTC by IvanChan2000 ♦1 |
| 174479551 (Comments: 1) | samuelsandor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravim, poprosim trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien, pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn . A tiez uvadzajte skutocne zdroje, "byvalu stanicu" na Ortofoto snimkach nevidite. commented 2025-11-23 13:07:09 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 175024941 (Comments: 1) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 60) | Creado el Cañón Rojo con sus acantilados, importada la Rambla de Barrachina y mejorados los caminos circundantes commented 2025-11-23 13:04:28 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦223 |
| 174519061 (Comments: 6) | Protoxenus (Discussed changesets: 130) | Hallo nochmal, dein Argument mit dem Speicherplatz kann ich grundsätzlich nachvollziehen, aber finde nicht, dass es die Löschungen rechtfertigt. Wenn wir eine Weltkarte bauen wollen, dann wird das nun mal ein bisschen Speicherplatz b... commented 2025-11-23 12:56:24 UTC by Entbert ♦17 |
 | 144982413 (Comments: 3) | supersellout6907 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Scottish Gaelic and Irish are different languages, don't copy paste like that. commented 2025-11-23 12:51:24 UTC by jSeke ♦14 |
| 175021203 (Comments: 1) | dan980 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ciao e grazie per tutte queste modifiche a Seui, in particolare a Per de Idda, rione che mi ha sempre dato delle gatte da pelare 😅❤️ Quindi hai fatto veramente un survey? Com'è stato? commented 2025-11-23 12:49:32 UTC by EneaSuper ♦463 |
| 175023392 (Comments: 2) | Nail Bar Tbilisi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially revert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175024303) commented 2025-11-23 12:46:16 UTC by empty_child ♦363 |
| 175024205 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse2 (Discussed changesets: 66) | I've not been in for years but news reports suggest it was still there in at least 2023. commented 2025-11-23 12:43:50 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,537 |
| 174850594 (Comments: 3) | mkarau (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello mkarau, I understand your point of view, but I would like to clarify that anyone making modifications to the OSM maps, whether local or non-local, is expected to follow the OSM policy, as I explained in detail in my previous reply. We hope y... commented 2025-11-23 12:35:30 UTC by mona_magdy ♦17 |
| 169301144 (Comments: 4) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ok, j'ai un peu modifié le noeud, si un jour tu repasses par là quand ils sont ouverts, le plus simple c'est de leur demander leur numéro siret, (normalement indiqué sur leur tampon, tiquet de caisse et/ou factur... commented 2025-11-23 12:35:01 UTC by Yunan973 ♦80 |
 | 174547000 (Comments: 1) | lawrencebanks (Discussed changesets: 29) | Could you please share the sources you use for each of your changeset? Also, we generally prefer to place each POI residing in large areas nearest to the entrance to help know how to approach it, as documented on the wiki. Please do not alter the lay... commented 2025-11-23 12:29:21 UTC by bkil ♦329 |
| 174826705 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 306) | Any reason why you've gone with amenity rather than man_made for these? Previously there were 70 uniquely man_made https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2g2d and 45 uniquely amenity https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2g2c , and 16 both https://overpass-turbo.eu... commented 2025-11-23 12:27:20 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,537 |
| 175023206 (Comments: 1) | Anuj Jonnala (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 12:21:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
 | 174987481 (Comments: 2) | ilias_ (Discussed changesets: 22) | No worries commented 2025-11-23 12:17:05 UTC by ilias_ ♦344 |
| 174327022 (Comments: 1) | vott (Discussed changesets: 3) | In plaats van WC's in het stadhuis, heb je hier van het stadhuis een WC gemaakt :) Het is ondertussen verbeterd. commented 2025-11-23 12:11:30 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174595885 (Comments: 2) | lawrencebanks (Discussed changesets: 29) | https://privatebin.net/?3f857d48b5a22655#3W2Fr5GBzTL8oFk98hC4dh7UeirZwCDGj4WW7eWFSm4A commented 2025-11-23 12:04:54 UTC by bkil ♦329 |
| 175022678 (Comments: 1) | OSM Contributer (Discussed changesets: 1) | I forgot to say but I also split a residential road and made some part of it service way and slipway commented 2025-11-23 12:02:02 UTC by OSM Contributer ♦7 |
| 175004216 (Comments: 1) | Wilimits (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj na OpenStreetMap. Komentarze opisu zmian służą do podawania, co się zmieniło na mapie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-23 12:00:21 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 154194962 (Comments: 2) | Giertje64 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi Werner, Inderdaad, ik heb deze tags verkeerd toegepast. Op de Wiki staat het duidelijk omschreven, ik ga die eens verder doornemen. Dank voor de uitleg en correctie. commented 2025-11-23 11:54:57 UTC by Giertje64 ♦1 |
| 175001428 (Comments: 2) | michal_f (Discussed changesets: 17) | Racja... commented 2025-11-23 11:52:10 UTC by michal_f ♦15 |
| 174831679 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hallo osm-pt-account, Leider liegst Du mit deiner Annahme falsch. Die Linie OVG 31 ist ein reines Linientaxi, in dem Du dich eine Stunde vorher für die Fahrt anmelden musst. Gilt für jede Fahrt. Hier noch ein Begleittext aus d... commented 2025-11-23 11:47:07 UTC by marcoSt ♦119 |
| 174381955 (Comments: 4) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 30) | Тогда можете удалить, я же возьму на заметку commented 2025-11-23 11:46:30 UTC by empty_child ♦363 |
| 141768502 (Comments: 1) | skinlo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for fixing this. You've no idea if there's a diversion for the New River Path signposted, have you? Just asking on the off chance... Cheers, Andy commented 2025-11-23 11:34:56 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,537 |
| 175006184 (Comments: 3) | yetzt (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hm...okay. I see your point. Your change fits the definition. I then ask myself the question, how do we differentiate between a hairdresser who offers vegan hair products and vegan food? 🤔 commented 2025-11-23 11:16:32 UTC by Kristjan ESPERANTO ♦57 |
| 169328500 (Comments: 1) | Brummi2021 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Brummi2021, laut Presseberichten sollten die Bauarbeiten auf der Rheinberger Straße in Budberg nur bis Anfang August 2025 dauern. In OSM ist sie aber immer noch gesperrt. Weißt du wie die Situation vor Ort ist? commented 2025-11-23 11:09:00 UTC by Muhmaker ♦130 |
| 175020129 (Comments: 1) | Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Hetis... Wanneer het bedrijf sluit zal het adres achterblijven. Daarom liever niet de hele adresnode verwijderen.. Adresnode nr 109 hersteld. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-23 11:06:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 175020526 (Comments: 1) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Savacoop - poljoprivredni proizvodi commented 2025-11-23 10:51:23 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦8 |
| 174969864 (Comments: 6) | bikerguy12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | bro stop vandalism on osm. commented 2025-11-23 10:49:59 UTC by thebeastmodo1 ♦2 |
| 169211997 (Comments: 1) | Gerhard42 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello, Thanks for the improvement. camp_site=camp_pitch is depreciated in favor of tourism=camp_pitch Regards, Marc commented 2025-11-23 10:40:45 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,308 |
| 174534807 (Comments: 2) | wielandb (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi Roger, vielen Dank für dein Feedback! Ich finde dass diese Änderung nicht nur nicht unnötig, sondern ein wichtiger Teil der QA ist. Deswegem habe ich eine Maproulette-Challenge entworfen, die ich u.a. mit diesem Än... commented 2025-11-23 10:34:44 UTC by wielandb ♦138 |
| 175019115 (Comments: 1) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Proizvodnja i prodaja hleba, svežeg peciva i kolača commented 2025-11-23 10:32:04 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦8 |
| 175019804 (Comments: 1) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Trgovina na malo metalnom robom, bojama i staklom u specijalizovanim prodavnicama commented 2025-11-23 10:30:54 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦8 |
| 174998836 (Comments: 1) | Felis Pimeja (Discussed changesets: 68) | а тег офиса?) commented 2025-11-23 10:26:08 UTC by literan ♦6,878 |
| 174960103 (Comments: 3) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 177) | Hi, in Ordnung. Danke für den Hinweis. Leider sind nicht alle Bundesländer in Wiki aufgelistet. NRW fehlt auch ;-) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Track:access Gruß, Z. commented 2025-11-23 10:25:29 UTC by Znaika ♦128 |
| 175001539 (Comments: 1) | Daniil Musatov (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856400105 между инициалами вообще-то положены пробелы (в идеале неразрывные, и еще лучше если тонка шпация) commented 2025-11-23 10:24:11 UTC by literan ♦6,878 |
| 174918846 (Comments: 2) | kapazao_import (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hola, eso no es problema de este conjunto de cambios sino de que faltase ya esa información, que no era el objetivo en este conjunto de cambios. Eso debe hacerse de otra forma. Aquí tan solo se corrigió el etiquetado railway d... commented 2025-11-23 10:18:45 UTC by kapazao ♦943 |
| 175019434 (Comments: 2) | BeDazzle My Events San Bernardino (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Event planning company in San Bernardino CA" commented 2025-11-23 10:18:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174229241 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_VectorRelay (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, fyi you broke the member ordering on the bus route relations here when you split the way. (it's been fixed) commented 2025-11-23 10:17:00 UTC by oba510 ♦269 |
| 174154852 (Comments: 2) | kapazao_import (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hola, no hago ediciones masivas a ciegas. Que pueda haber algún caso muy contado que haya tenido problema no quiere decir que se haya hecho sin pensar. En este caso teniendo en cuenta la wiki sobre highway=motorway_junction, se explica ... commented 2025-11-23 10:15:15 UTC by kapazao ♦943 |
| 174553140 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_MapMasker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, fyi you broke the member ordering on a bus route relation when you split the way here. (it's been fixed) commented 2025-11-23 10:12:27 UTC by oba510 ♦269 |
| 174599154 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_MapShadow (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, fyi you broke the member ordering on a bus route relation here when you split Gateway Boulevard (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19701963). (it's been fixed) commented 2025-11-23 10:06:10 UTC by oba510 ♦269 |
| 174736832 (Comments: 2) | Toli99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your comment. It seems like there was an error. I will take your comment into consideration. commented 2025-11-23 10:02:27 UTC by Toli99 ♦1 |
| 174681584 (Comments: 3) | SPLATPLAYS (Discussed changesets: 6) | The/Corp can be changed, its part of the address on the house at the gates, the 2-9 is on the house and represents 10 whilst being 2-9. I'm just filling in places exactly as they are written. commented 2025-11-23 09:43:35 UTC by SPLATPLAYS ♦2 |
| 174818457 (Comments: 1) | bullitss (Discussed changesets: 5) | Salut, étant donné que je ne suis pas trop calé sur OSM au niveau des attributs, pourrais-tu m'expliquer pourquoi as-tu mis que ces bâtiments étaient en construction alors qu'ils sont en cours de dém... commented 2025-11-23 09:42:46 UTC by amzlc ♦4 |
| 175016890 (Comments: 1) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Parking kod bazena. Radno vreme bazena: od 10h do 19h Radi leti samo pošto su otvoreni bazeni commented 2025-11-23 09:41:56 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦8 |
| 175017703 (Comments: 1) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 8) | PerSu marketi Kralja Aleksandra 63 023/812-551 · 064/824-8181 Bosanska 89 023/812-563 · 064/840-2306 Radno vreme: 6:30-21:30h, nedeljom: 7:00-20h commented 2025-11-23 09:39:45 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦8 |
| 174555048 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_HiddenRoute (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, fyi you broke the member order on a few bus route relations here when you split the way. (it's been fixed) commented 2025-11-23 09:39:01 UTC by oba510 ♦269 |
| 174998792 (Comments: 3) | Ádámka (Discussed changesets: 2) | Szia! Telekkönyvileg az utca eleje nem is utca, hanem a telek része. Ha bemész nézd meg légy szíves, hogy hátul jobb oldalt megvan-e még a Turistaház utca tábla. Kö... commented 2025-11-23 09:35:16 UTC by vasony ♦539 |
| 174750057 (Comments: 1) | Lockstar (Discussed changesets: 67) | hey, this one is actually 4958. There is another set of TfNSW lights slightly futher south which was unmapped until now. Maybe that one is 4999? https://osm.org/relation/19873095 commented 2025-11-23 09:34:32 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦422 |
| 175015221 (Comments: 1) | IvanChan2000 (Discussed changesets: 13) | 1. Please don't delete `=footway` across buildings 2. Please don't delete shops directly, as they still represent store spaces. This makes tracking and updating more difficult. It should be changed to existing tenant, or "Vacant&quo... commented 2025-11-23 09:33:20 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,658 |
| 174985545 (Comments: 3) | 309_308_307 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Auf https://www.rmv.de/auskunft/rmv/app/#!P|TP!H|597532 sieht man einen Bus S5N auf Weingärtenumgehung und Oberhöchstadter Straße. Ich bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob das eine zulässige Quelle ist. und nachts fahre ich nicht mit... commented 2025-11-23 09:31:57 UTC by Senihtu ♦103 |
| 175005685 (Comments: 1) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Kiki Retail Park je jedini retail park u Kikindi. 13 lokala na 5.300m2, 100+ parking mesta. Radno vreme: 9-21h commented 2025-11-23 09:30:34 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦8 |
 | 174810601 (Comments: 3) | NumisK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi NumisK, Thank you for your understanding. We are all here to make OSM maps better. Best regards, Aya commented 2025-11-23 09:16:45 UTC by Aya Samir ♦35 |
| 160272154 (Comments: 2) | jbcharron (Discussed changesets: 25) | Bonjour, Merci pour la vigilance, même si man_made=charge_point est indiqué à utiliser sur le wiki, il est malheureusement trop peu utilisé, je ferais attention la prochaine fois a utiliser uniquement amenity=charging_st... commented 2025-11-23 09:13:25 UTC by jbcharron ♦137 |
| 174805401 (Comments: 3) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Wieso beantwortest du Fragen, die du nicht mal verstehst? commented 2025-11-23 09:13:17 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,951 |
| 175016868 (Comments: 1) | Dokgurte (Discussed changesets: 1) | The data was added based on the knowledge of the area commented 2025-11-23 09:13:05 UTC by Dokgurte ♦1 |
| 175017294 (Comments: 2) | Luis Danfold (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "HVAC services in Hamilton" commented 2025-11-23 09:12:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174975934 (Comments: 6) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | merci pour ce conseil commented 2025-11-23 09:11:11 UTC by eurelien ♦7 |
| 173856160 (Comments: 12) | bentzy (Discussed changesets: 32) | כתבתי באריכות בדיון בפורום. התיאור ארוך לא תמציתי ולא מסכם במילה או שתיים את סוג הנקודה. commented 2025-11-23 09:09:13 UTC by hatul ♦420 |
| 119066930 (Comments: 3) | AlaskaDave (Discussed changesets: 59) | Sadly it is quite hard to say, as I am not experienced with location (I never visited Thailand, and the closest I got was on trip to z Ukraine). Also I have limited experience with jewellery. Though if they sell bracelets/necklaces - ev... commented 2025-11-23 09:06:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 175004233 (Comments: 1) | somefunnystuff4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't use Bing imagery for clarifying geometry of any object. This imagery is very inaccurate in Georgia commented 2025-11-23 08:57:05 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦215 |
| 174965500 (Comments: 2) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 23) | Recreation_ground to nie obiekt do ćwiczeń, dosłowne tłumaczenie to teren rekreacyjny. Alternatywą, nad którą też się zastanawiałem byłoby landuse=education, jako że jest to teren Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego i przy każdym okazie ... commented 2025-11-23 08:45:03 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦27 |
| 174991105 (Comments: 1) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bridge tag removed from 7km long highway. commented 2025-11-23 08:45:02 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 175006083 (Comments: 3) | dra_fer2000 (Discussed changesets: 8) | 3 Oktobra 2025 je u ovom objektu otvorena kineska robna kuća. Nekadašnji hotel pre mnogo godina, diskoteka jedno kratko vreme, prodavnica Idea... commented 2025-11-23 08:40:36 UTC by dra_fer2000 ♦8 |
| 174991418 (Comments: 1) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 10) | Way: 1452795552 removed, it duplicated an existing highway and was tagged as a 28km long bridge. commented 2025-11-23 08:39:57 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
 | 174982149 (Comments: 6) | rusjanis (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ā, nu viss ir skaidrs! commented 2025-11-23 08:38:01 UTC by somehundred ♦109 |
| 174982053 (Comments: 1) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, I've removed highways Way: 1452817916 and Way: 1452810764 as they duplicated the line of an existing highway. commented 2025-11-23 08:34:44 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 174967785 (Comments: 1) | animebirder (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/613972514. What ist the mean of the tag abaq = yes ? commented 2025-11-23 08:32:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174992679 (Comments: 2) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 10) | I also removed the water=lake from the highway. commented 2025-11-23 08:29:35 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 174977610 (Comments: 1) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, I've removed the highway Way: NH 6 (1452795553) because it duplicated the existing highway Way: NH 6 (296008360). This probably caused some of the 93 crossing highway warnings given above. Highway duplication could cause disruption... commented 2025-11-23 08:18:47 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 174994021 (Comments: 1) | Der Troisdorfer (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo Troistorfer, Du gestaltest die Häuser wirklich ausgesprochen schön. Es freut mich, solche Gebäude zu sehen. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.8100256&lon=7.1470144&zoom=21&camera.theta=51.066&camera.phi=-3... commented 2025-11-23 08:18:05 UTC by Bekudio ♦4 |
| 174952276 (Comments: 1) | omérindol (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1311777815, https://www.osm.org/way/1311777812 . What is the mean of the tag 2=4? commented 2025-11-23 08:16:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 175015995 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 12) | i am not sure if the lot north of the trailhead is under GT control. but its going to be open space/nature reserve commented 2025-11-23 08:15:56 UTC by ieguy3 ♦12 |
| 135143475 (Comments: 1) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 28) | Stand heute früh in der Zeitung: Beispiel Dell. Das Vorhaben, in Alt-Richterich, nördlich von Vetschauer Weg und Banker Geldstraße, Wohnraum für bis zu 6000 Neubürger zu schaffen, steht seit vielen Jahren auf der Agen... commented 2025-11-23 08:03:17 UTC by Peer van Daalen ♦71 |
 | 174834443 (Comments: 1) | boocha34 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451806539/ As the A5 is marked highway=construction, this means that this section of road is not available to use. Is this correct? commented 2025-11-23 08:01:38 UTC by VictorIE ♦966 |
| 175010775 (Comments: 1) | Croissant98520 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/changeset/175015181. commented 2025-11-23 07:33:45 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 175011302 (Comments: 1) | JosephBrown27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. And please do not add an object as bo... commented 2025-11-23 07:25:17 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174947139 (Comments: 1) | Osaka78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number. For freecall numbe... commented 2025-11-23 07:22:10 UTC by tastrax ♦1,177 |
 | 175005266 (Comments: 1) | Raisa Kamal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 07:14:28 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175004237 (Comments: 1) | fyp483694 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 07:14:24 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175003605 (Comments: 1) | LaSalle_Guy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 07:14:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175003248 (Comments: 1) | drittel-matzos (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-23 07:14:21 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175014851 (Comments: 1) | Hung Tran 9x0 (Discussed changesets: 10) | phần trước nhìn nhầm ghi chú nên tôi sửa lại commented 2025-11-23 07:14:16 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦22 |
| 175000575 (Comments: 1) | Ádámka (Discussed changesets: 2) | Szia! A táblán külön van írva, a módosításodat visszavontam. Tamás commented 2025-11-23 06:19:01 UTC by vasony ♦539 |
| 175012918 (Comments: 1) | 旧加卷 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 此为针对https://osm.org/changeset/175008104 的更改，变更集175008104的变更内容包括将 https://osm.org/relation/18500468 的标签"boundary=relation" (?)修改为"boundary=administrative" commented 2025-11-23 06:15:36 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦17 |
| 125177503 (Comments: 3) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 89) | Hi Marc, I'm in Suva currently so I am not sure what the story is. Check out the Spa Country Railway and see how redevelopment is tracking commented 2025-11-23 05:39:38 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦409 |
| 172950731 (Comments: 2) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi StreetSurveyor, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. Regards, rajdhani commented 2025-11-23 05:25:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦6 |
 | 175013189 (Comments: 2) | nicolepere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aquí está un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Agregué casas con varios niveles y alturas" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added houses with... commented 2025-11-23 05:06:38 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174707924 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 115) | This is A LOT of different changes across the entire state. Please break up your changes by what the change is and/or into smaller geographical areas. I see changes consisting of: moving name_1 to alt_name, moving numerical names from alt_nam... commented 2025-11-23 04:59:45 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦57 |
| 174821295 (Comments: 1) | Bradgrover (Discussed changesets: 9) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18993 commented 2025-11-23 04:50:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174889868 (Comments: 3) | jakecopp (Discussed changesets: 43) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175012312 commented 2025-11-23 03:50:33 UTC by ArchangelEkim ♦16 |
| 136248823 (Comments: 1) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 32) | Beste, addr: tags hebben geen zin op een boundary= . commented 2025-11-23 03:43:57 UTC by abs8_josm ♦4 |
| 175010380 (Comments: 2) | KayleeSerenada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated ways with asphalt surface, website, and phone details" commented 2025-11-23 03:37:10 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
 | 175011627 (Comments: 3) | Cadde Plus Diş Polikliniği (Discussed changesets: 2) | Örneğin, açıklamanızın daha tarafsız ve gerçeklere dayalı bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Alanya'da diş kliniği" --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-11-23 03:01:26 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 130231826 (Comments: 1) | 特蕾西娅 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 您好，火车站一般不加通名“站”字吧，您如果熟悉的话可以改一下 commented 2025-11-23 03:00:37 UTC by HerryCFPL ♦5 |
| 130160296 (Comments: 1) | 特蕾西娅 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 您好，火车站一般不加通名“站”字吧，您如果熟悉的话可以改一下 commented 2025-11-23 03:00:07 UTC by HerryCFPL ♦5 |
 | 175011478 (Comments: 2) | Titocardona94 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aquí tienes un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Actualizadas las características de la carretera con superficie de asfalto, nombres, número de carriles y límites de velocidad" (Auto-tra... commented 2025-11-23 02:59:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 175011273 (Comments: 3) | Cadde Plus Diş Polikliniği (Discussed changesets: 2) | Örneğin, açıklamanızın daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Diş polikliniği Adana" --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-11-23 02:37:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
 | 173734575 (Comments: 1) | Ahmed Wali Deria Guled (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - incorrect tagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011241 commented 2025-11-23 02:30:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172854659 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172899206 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172828232 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172743997 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172899676 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172635788 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172599959 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172939547 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172593677 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172513691 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172590432 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172590194 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172539288 (Comments: 1) | DiaouligRu (Discussed changesets: 21) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172560781 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | DWG revert - unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015 commented 2025-11-23 02:15:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174545980 (Comments: 1) | wkLeon (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, the page you’re citing is outdated and historical, as seen at the top of the page. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging/Routes#California for current tagging guidelines applicable to California. If you think w... commented 2025-11-23 01:40:38 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦588 |
| 175010375 (Comments: 2) | world_1tky3o1x (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "Mises à jour des limites de vitesse maximales à 30 et 50" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Up... commented 2025-11-23 01:36:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 94594656 (Comments: 1) | ÖTK (Discussed changesets: 44) | Für ein Fahrverbot, (das nicht für Fußgänger gilt), gibt es vehicle=no. Dann spart man sich das foot=yes und alle anderen "no", und es ist auch kein Widerspruch wie jetzt (access=no und foot=yes). commented 2025-11-23 01:14:12 UTC by kuhni74 ♦400 |
| 174964423 (Comments: 1) | DigitalTyrant (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline, then just type a "q". Also most images are from an angle which seems to show roof lines as not square. Most are. --- Published using OSMCha: http... commented 2025-11-23 00:53:41 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 175009331 (Comments: 1) | Lysathor (Discussed changesets: 1) | this is the revert for the previous deletion commented 2025-11-23 00:46:02 UTC by Lysathor ♦1 |
| 174972954 (Comments: 1) | Lamvanduchason (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check https://oam.org/note/5064207 commented 2025-11-23 00:32:42 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
| 174976257 (Comments: 1) | Lamvanduchason (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check https://oam.org/note/5064207 commented 2025-11-23 00:32:39 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
| 174681754 (Comments: 1) | Yoshijeybs0116 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009556#map=7/12.195/124.365. Reason: mass unexplained deletions. commented 2025-11-23 00:29:36 UTC by TagaSanPedroAko ♦529 |
| 174999619 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174922094 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174578679 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174578902 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 173695826 (Comments: 2) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174581409 (Comments: 2) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174608337 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
 | 174785140 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174872603 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174875731 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 173695498 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 172317613 (Comments: 1) | Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia (Discussed changesets: 12) | DWG revert - spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334 commented 2025-11-23 00:15:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174998542 (Comments: 4) | thompsondt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Looking through changes in the site from recent years, it is possible that the area is deliberately being seeded. I have visited this location several times, although not in the past two years. If it is the case that the driveway deliberately being c... commented 2025-11-23 00:01:33 UTC by thompsondt ♦3 |
| 174879915 (Comments: 1) | CNeal (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset removed the highway tag from 30 ways --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174879915 commented 2025-11-22 23:56:58 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,135 |
| 173894506 (Comments: 1) | trungsmile_79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175008811 commented 2025-11-22 23:48:05 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 175007797 (Comments: 2) | punkfairie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed polling station details, updated commercial building attributes" commented 2025-11-22 23:36:22 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
 | 174987455 (Comments: 2) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 35) | Please check https://osm.org/note/5064170 commented 2025-11-22 23:15:16 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
| 175007851 (Comments: 1) | iso-lator (Discussed changesets: 12) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13325105918 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-11-22 23:00:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
 | 174700914 (Comments: 2) | serock (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hola Manuel Retamozo, como vi que el rulo de la autopista estaba como construction=motorway_link + highway=construction, desde el 03/11/2019 pensé que habían iniciado la obra desde Centenario, ahí arreglo ambos problemas, saludos... commented 2025-11-22 22:41:42 UTC by serock ♦76 |
| 171399637 (Comments: 12) | Lumor2020 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Danke, die Diskussion hatte ich nicht gesehen. commented 2025-11-22 22:23:06 UTC by Strubbl ♦569 |
| 175006804 (Comments: 1) | schobbish (Discussed changesets: 1) | signs* commented 2025-11-22 22:19:52 UTC by schobbish ♦3 |
| 174952794 (Comments: 2) | jkorf (Discussed changesets: 14) | Gefikst! commented 2025-11-22 22:16:45 UTC by jkorf ♦9 |
| 172051863 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 368) | Hello, I am editing the foot paths in this area, and identified this service road you created as a foot path. I went ahead and applied this tagging change, but I am happy to discuss this matter further if you have more information. Thanks commented 2025-11-22 22:11:33 UTC by jacobwhall ♦44 |
| 174842817 (Comments: 3) | maggot32footoot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the excellent explanations, scrambling_panda. I apologize for not providing feedback! commented 2025-11-22 22:03:47 UTC by iandees ♦757 |
| 174943541 (Comments: 1) | VBNechtzeit (Discussed changesets: 0) | Please check https://osm.org/note/5064129 commented 2025-11-22 22:03:26 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
| 174969637 (Comments: 2) | Jaksza (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zasugerowałem się wiki i mapką powiatową, które akurat pokrywała się z drogami tej klasy. Faktycznie mogłem lepiej sprecyzować o co mi chodziło, a mianowicie zauważyłem że na paru odcinkach w tym rejonie drogi miały inny typ niż ... commented 2025-11-22 22:00:53 UTC by Jaksza ♦2 |
| 174997715 (Comments: 2) | MK 1 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello. Sorry. I used the name in macedonian for european France => Европска Франција. commented 2025-11-22 21:15:20 UTC by MK 1 ♦19 |
| 162681282 (Comments: 2) | Rhys Tilford (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482 commented 2025-11-22 20:43:01 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 173347122 (Comments: 1) | Rhys Tilford (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482 commented 2025-11-22 20:42:51 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 173347155 (Comments: 1) | Rhys Tilford (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482 commented 2025-11-22 20:42:46 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 173347539 (Comments: 1) | Rhys Tilford (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482 commented 2025-11-22 20:42:42 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 173347598 (Comments: 1) | Rhys Tilford (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482 commented 2025-11-22 20:42:36 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 173347658 (Comments: 1) | Rhys Tilford (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482 commented 2025-11-22 20:42:31 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 173391094 (Comments: 1) | Rhys Tilford (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482 commented 2025-11-22 20:42:19 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 168234843 (Comments: 2) | Beakerboy (Discussed changesets: 7) | I think I may have pressed the “Duplicate” button to copy one of your benches to tag all the bench locations. This one I copied was probably pre-labeled as 10 or 12 seats. commented 2025-11-22 20:14:26 UTC by Beakerboy ♦5 |
| 174995387 (Comments: 2) | christosnt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174997286 commented 2025-11-22 20:11:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 167979687 (Comments: 2) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:09:20 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 167979692 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:09:17 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 167979705 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:09:15 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 167979739 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:09:03 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 167979796 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:08:41 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 167979833 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:06:51 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 167980050 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:05:41 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 170271981 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:05:20 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 170272004 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:05:13 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 172195337 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:05:05 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 172687227 (Comments: 1) | Cedar Behnke (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574 commented 2025-11-22 20:04:11 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174992716 (Comments: 2) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 48) | https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.9856710&lon=5.8446459&zoom=19&camera.phi=5.734 commented 2025-11-22 19:57:02 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 17703902 (Comments: 1) | Prog-x (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, d'oü vient le nom de Chemin du Haut-du-Mont ? le terrain dit Haut-du-Mont et le RegBl aussi Salutations, Marc commented 2025-11-22 19:52:04 UTC by Marc_ch ♦288 |
| 165210024 (Comments: 1) | Karl2710 (Discussed changesets: 13) | fixme="Für eine Ortsstraße fehlt hier der Ort. Falsche Straßenart" -> dann ändere doch einfach von highway=residential zu =unclassified commented 2025-11-22 19:48:17 UTC by DeFra85 ♦263 |
| 160447749 (Comments: 2) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 115) | Hola, Alan. Error mío, lo siento. Ya está corregido. Quise añadir la etimología a la calle y copié mal las etiquetas. commented 2025-11-22 19:46:56 UTC by dcapillae ♦383 |
| 174970830 (Comments: 1) | kpkpkp42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Any clarification on this and your other deletions? It seems unlikely that this camera would have been removed within two weeks of being added to the map. commented 2025-11-22 19:36:09 UTC by HashFerret ♦9 |
| 174867518 (Comments: 1) | vrg (Discussed changesets: 19) | Nazwa drogi do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy commented 2025-11-22 19:35:51 UTC by olo81 ♦691 |
 | 175001602 (Comments: 1) | Ronaldo Bowen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I accidentally uploaded these edits as part of my university project. They do not reflect real-world conditions. Could someone please revert this changeset? Thank you and apologies commented 2025-11-22 19:26:41 UTC by Ronaldo Bowen ♦1 |
| 174997247 (Comments: 1) | Bmmederos1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | the wikidata entry you changed the village of Miami Shores to point to says it is in Indonesia but the boundary relation you edited is in the US so I doubt that this is correct. commented 2025-11-22 19:21:56 UTC by Udarian ♦528 |
| 174982572 (Comments: 1) | Marek Vašků (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am new to this. When can i see the change applied or what should be my next steps? commented 2025-11-22 19:20:19 UTC by Marek Vašků ♦1 |
| 172022458 (Comments: 2) | Léo_MdP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je réagis par rapport à https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4987308 Vous pouvez peut-être apporter une réponse ? commented 2025-11-22 19:16:15 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦32 |
| 174646008 (Comments: 3) | piksel169 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Edycja wycofana że względu na brak reakcji be komentarze https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175001989 commented 2025-11-22 19:08:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 175001581 (Comments: 1) | JMGonk (Discussed changesets: 4) | Note: I'm relying on machine translation but I'm almost certain the name: tag is incorrect. I have found photos of the facility and the English name is prominently displayed on it, but there is no obvious Arabic name I have seen. commented 2025-11-22 19:04:26 UTC by JMGonk ♦4 |
| 169681566 (Comments: 2) | rmikke (Discussed changesets: 60) | Ja sprawdziłem, od ronda. commented 2025-11-22 19:04:24 UTC by rmikke ♦113 |
| 174964086 (Comments: 4) | NicoVanLeeuwen (Discussed changesets: 2) | (Ze zouden namelijk eigenlijk nobrand=yes moeten gebruiken.) commented 2025-11-22 18:46:56 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦691 |
| 174743779 (Comments: 3) | CiconiaOSM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Andreas, die Änderungen auf der Wikidata-Seite hatte ich auch selbst durchgeführt. Das ist für den iD-Editor aber nicht relevant, die Lizenz von Wikidata ist nicht mit der von OSM kompatibel, so dass Daten von dort nicht ohne... commented 2025-11-22 18:38:28 UTC by scai ♦277 |
| 171981267 (Comments: 1) | incoded (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175000695 commented 2025-11-22 18:35:50 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 172454510 (Comments: 1) | incoded (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175000695 commented 2025-11-22 18:35:00 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 173546954 (Comments: 1) | incoded (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175000695 commented 2025-11-22 18:34:32 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 173841815 (Comments: 1) | incoded (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175000695 commented 2025-11-22 18:31:18 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174993475 (Comments: 4) | -syn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke... Dan kan die voorlopig weg. Je commentaar was 174993475 Specify whether various amenities are covered Vandaar.... Zal 'm weer verwijderen. Mapse eggie commented 2025-11-22 18:29:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174523270 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Santsch (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merci d'arrêter de cartographier des lignes ferroviaires qui n'existent plus depuis longtemps et pour lesquelles il n'existe plus aucune trace tangible de leur ancienne existence sur le terrain. Pour ce type de données, c&... commented 2025-11-22 18:17:12 UTC by MFlamm ♦65 |
| 174998626 (Comments: 1) | PeetX (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Peet, Lijkt mij oke zo.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:piste:type Mapse, eggie commented 2025-11-22 18:11:40 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174972315 (Comments: 2) | User721 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for letting me know! I'll learn more about it then try editing accordingly. commented 2025-11-22 18:06:00 UTC by User721 ♦1 |
| 174780149 (Comments: 4) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 106) | Ok. commented 2025-11-22 17:46:56 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦104 |
| 174998752 (Comments: 1) | Tatfahren (Discussed changesets: 79) | Quelle ist falsch commented 2025-11-22 17:34:40 UTC by Tatfahren ♦299 |
| 168040316 (Comments: 2) | mjgk (Discussed changesets: 26) | After staring at this longer, I think I understand what happened. There used to be a way as part of the railway=disused. Then a stream crossing this railway was added and this section of the way was split off and tagged as a track and a bridge. Howev... commented 2025-11-22 17:33:55 UTC by aki007 ♦10 |
| 102629314 (Comments: 1) | OT Hossegor (Discussed changesets: 21) | bonjour @OT Hossegor pouvez-vous vérifier le n° de téléphone de cet établissement "Les Jardins d'Hossegor", en effet il y a actuellement des chiffres en trop, le n° que vous avez indiqué n&... commented 2025-11-22 17:06:39 UTC by Patchanka ♦412 |
| 174780648 (Comments: 3) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 63) | I see your point but I have to disagree. A highest point is definitely an important feature, but you're opening the door to include any important features inside the relations. This sort of data fits way better in wikidata statements, and imho, ... commented 2025-11-22 16:44:28 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦223 |
| 161419583 (Comments: 1) | MarionRAP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Marion, Je crois qu’il y a une erreur : https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=17.2/50.563088/3.005523&pic=6fea0bee-c046-4d5e-8655-c268272993f6&speed=250&theme=age&xyz=80.40/6.93/30 |
| 174993004 (Comments: 2) | kstalnaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174994425 Thanks, MassCartog commented 2025-11-22 16:37:48 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174029727 (Comments: 2) | Cool_RedGuy (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hab aus dem Gebäude wieder ein allgemeines Gebäude gemacht und die Fahrschule auf einen eigenen node gezogen commented 2025-11-22 16:29:00 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,702 |
| 158078593 (Comments: 5) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Danke, habe jetzt area eingefügt für den Routenplaner. Hoffe, das stimmt so. Meine Ursprungsfrage war mehr kosmetischer Natur, also nicht so wichtig. commented 2025-11-22 16:15:54 UTC by matze089 ♦31 |
| 174988618 (Comments: 1) | Hotze-RB (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, auch hier musste ich einen Teil deiner Anpassungen (ohne Datenverlust) rückgängig machen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-11-22 16:09:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174987083 (Comments: 1) | Hotze-RB (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, bitte prüfe, ob die Hydranten wirklich "rot" sind. In der Regel passt das bei Unterflurhydranten nicht. Viele Grüße commented 2025-11-22 16:05:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 124255962 (Comments: 1) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 134) | Hola JJ, En este changeset, pusiste mucho de la caretera en surface=asphalt. Cuando veo ahora con Bing, no me parece correcto. Si tenias mejor fuente que yo, revertimos https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174994836 commented 2025-11-22 16:04:38 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174980642 (Comments: 4) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | N’hésitez pas corriger. commented 2025-11-22 16:03:24 UTC by eurelien ♦7 |
| 174986842 (Comments: 1) | Hotze-RB (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, eine Anmerkung zu dem von dir erfassten Hydranten: Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:K... commented 2025-11-22 16:03:19 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174987272 (Comments: 1) | Hotze-RB (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast gleich mehrere Straßen so verschoben, dass ich es manuell nicht mehr korrigiert bekommen habe und daher alle deine Änderungen in diesem Changeset rückgängig machen musst... commented 2025-11-22 16:01:23 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174994450 (Comments: 1) | Greg Metz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Vos modifications sont erronées, merci de ne pas renseigner n'importe quoi dans la base données OpenStreetMap. Vos modifications vont être annulées Jean-Baptiste commented 2025-11-22 15:59:57 UTC by jbcharron ♦137 |
| 174962135 (Comments: 1) | SRBond (Discussed changesets: 1) | This looks to be in the middle of a field. Could you describe where this camera actually is? I can line it up for you. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174962135 commented 2025-11-22 15:50:14 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 174121952 (Comments: 3) | philippec (Discussed changesets: 63) | ok. dankuwel. commented 2025-11-22 15:48:46 UTC by MikiDi ♦23 |
| 174861573 (Comments: 2) | OlgierdR (Discussed changesets: 20) | footway: ścieżka głównie lub przede wszystkim dla pieszych path: niesprecyzowana ścieżka używana przez pieszych, małe pojazdy lub zwierzęta ... A to jest po prostu betonowa kładka, czyli 'footbridge', czego naj... commented 2025-11-22 15:45:55 UTC by OlgierdR ♦7 |
| 174842463 (Comments: 2) | maggot32footoot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey maggot32foot, Just to clarify what was wrong with this changeset - if you follow the course of the way looking at aerial imagery, it becomes clear that this way doesn’t correspond to any physical object/structure. It jumps from one h... commented 2025-11-22 15:44:04 UTC by scrambling_panda ♦11 |
| 174989386 (Comments: 8) | PeetX (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je hebt nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-22 15:37:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174238384 (Comments: 2) | ImreSamu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174993605 commented 2025-11-22 15:37:22 UTC by infeeeee ♦608 |
| 174907515 (Comments: 2) | Baloo79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174993605 commented 2025-11-22 15:37:08 UTC by infeeeee ♦608 |
| 174851618 (Comments: 4) | arjunaraoc (Discussed changesets: 13) | I thought Wof follows CC-BY license as mentioned in the blog https://whosonfirst.org/blog/2023/06/19/introducting-karmashapes/ . Probably I got the tag suggestion from AI. I will clean up the tag in 3-4 days. commented 2025-11-22 15:26:30 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦573 |
| 174778493 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 308) | Co jest charakterystycznego w tym punkcie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/420377155, że tu następuje zmiana kategorii drogi? commented 2025-11-22 15:13:01 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 174735252 (Comments: 1) | 77Sergius77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hotel już jest na mapie. A firma jaką ma nazwę? commented 2025-11-22 15:11:07 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 172573751 (Comments: 1) | dahu83&04 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bonjour ! cette relation semble rassembler des variantes de la grande traversée des Préalpes, il serait sans doute mieux de regrouper l'ensemble ? Par ailleurs, j'ai constaté que les gestionnaires de la zo... commented 2025-11-22 15:04:03 UTC by StC ♦372 |
| 169540138 (Comments: 3) | The Invisible Freak (Discussed changesets: 9) | OK, danke commented 2025-11-22 15:03:39 UTC by tux67 ♦1,996 |
| 162692335 (Comments: 3) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 97) | Met de adressen en de andere namen zoals Hogepol botst dit verder niet echt. De Hogepol heeft als straat al een stevige aanwezigheid. commented 2025-11-22 14:56:07 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦691 |
| 174975877 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:52:53 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174975954 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:52:52 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976018 (Comments: 2) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:52:51 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 145968861 (Comments: 1) | Firefishy (Discussed changesets: 41) | disabled=yes seems like a strange way to tag a nonexistant railway halt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1214318902)? Maybe historic:railway=halt? (if it should even be on OSM). Likewise the railway marked as abandoned despite no trace on aerial i... commented 2025-11-22 14:52:16 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦126 |
| 174976117 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:52:09 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976128 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:52:02 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976170 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:52:00 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976204 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:51:54 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976217 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:51:51 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976252 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:51:48 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976278 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:51:35 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976301 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:51:28 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976345 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:51:17 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976367 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:51:06 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976386 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:50:57 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976407 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:50:50 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976421 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:50:40 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976449 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:50:31 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976516 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:50:22 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976570 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:50:15 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174988286 (Comments: 1) | Geim (Discussed changesets: 75) | Top. Dat zal nog wel iets verfijnd worden naarmate ze de werkzaamheden afronden. De loop van het water en de verkorte pijp kloppen zo in ieder geval mooi. commented 2025-11-22 14:50:06 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦691 |
| 174976612 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:49:41 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976625 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:49:40 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976659 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:49:38 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976719 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:49:34 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976746 (Comments: 1) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:49:25 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174976765 (Comments: 2) | @@@a1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655 commented 2025-11-22 14:49:23 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174981959 (Comments: 4) | ivanatora (Discussed changesets: 18) | I agree - slowly but surely the road infrastructure is getting better. commented 2025-11-22 14:46:49 UTC by ivanatora ♦129 |
| 174990347 (Comments: 1) | Franciszek Józef (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-11-22 14:31:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 170537231 (Comments: 2) | qumil (Discussed changesets: 62) | Niestety wiele dróg w biłgorajskich lasach ma grade1, choć nie są trwale utwardzone. Staram się to poprawiać, gdy mapuję coś w okolicy i znam te drogi commented 2025-11-22 14:15:29 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦798 |
| 174987222 (Comments: 2) | Mr FELGO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, I actually filled the informations correctly, but for some reason the values went in the wrong placeholders, we'll fix it, Thank you We found the address location totally wrong, and we had to fix it for our new project, AlloSyndic, s... commented 2025-11-22 14:05:03 UTC by Mr FELGO ♦1 |
| 169322298 (Comments: 1) | Aleksandar1994 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hey Aleksandar could you please double check this changeset? I think something broke with the Lemont relation, it's not searchable on Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=124883 commented 2025-11-22 13:58:25 UTC by vricciardulli ♦25 |
| 174983286 (Comments: 4) | jsrheatingandcooling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174988669 Thanks, user_5359 commented 2025-11-22 13:46:54 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174985874 (Comments: 1) | StachuMMV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-22 13:41:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 154563039 (Comments: 1) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 219) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Relacje_nie_s%C4%85_kategoriami commented 2025-11-22 13:32:01 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 154559748 (Comments: 1) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 219) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Relacje_nie_s%C4%85_kategoriami commented 2025-11-22 13:31:44 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 174987228 (Comments: 1) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 66) | Мерси. Аз се чудех дали да не го трия адреса отдеве... commented 2025-11-22 13:29:17 UTC by Fraxi ♦190 |
 | 170242059 (Comments: 2) | Refl_ex (Discussed changesets: 3) | Нет commented 2025-11-22 13:28:17 UTC by Refl_ex ♦17 |
| 174261487 (Comments: 3) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 303) | Bardzo ciekawe, dziękuję za objaśnienie. commented 2025-11-22 13:27:36 UTC by cielak42 ♦30 |
| 174604482 (Comments: 1) | Krzemyczek (Discussed changesets: 16) | Tag [website] służy do podawania strony konkretnego miejsca, a nie strony koncernu. commented 2025-11-22 13:26:56 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 174601373 (Comments: 1) | K2Diving (Discussed changesets: 1) | Komentarze opisu zmian służą do podawania, co się zmieniło na mapie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-22 13:25:44 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 173779263 (Comments: 2) | latvia-bot (Discussed changesets: 7) | If this was a bot edit, something went wrong. Why did it edit objects in France, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10709135? And why when I click on it, the area is outside the changeset box? commented 2025-11-22 13:21:52 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 174983884 (Comments: 2) | NeisReview (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the hint. But this is not an automated edit. 😉 commented 2025-11-22 13:19:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 173231755 (Comments: 2) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 303) | W tym miejscu nie ma działalności komercyjnej. Mogę zmienić na częściej używany [landuse=institutional]. commented 2025-11-22 13:17:24 UTC by maro21 ♦764 |
| 174985253 (Comments: 1) | TonyXDMac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-22 12:49:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174984343 (Comments: 1) | TonyXDMac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-22 12:49:38 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174984191 (Comments: 1) | TonyXDMac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-22 12:49:37 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174986788 (Comments: 2) | Global 1 Wholesale Merchant Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Merchant services company" commented 2025-11-22 12:48:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174968845 (Comments: 1) | Alejandra_Sterling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why did you split this street? What does it help? commented 2025-11-22 12:43:12 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦52 |
| 160958145 (Comments: 1) | wvdp (Discussed changesets: 152) | Hallo, schaust Du Dir bitte mal diesen Hinweis an ? Mir kommt das auch seltsam vor, zumal die Fläche mit Bürogebäuden bebaut ist und ich nicht glaube, dass sie für ein DataCenter abgerissen werden. Es geht um diese Baustelle: h... commented 2025-11-22 12:42:32 UTC by kaltuna ♦91 |
| 162246700 (Comments: 1) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 49) | I've noticed some concerns with this changeset. The added paths conflict with existing pathways connected to the existing roads, this is causing routing issues on the map, as well as creating things such as non existent bridges. I have co... commented 2025-11-22 12:30:10 UTC by FoldForever ♦1 |
| 174929334 (Comments: 1) | Noah Filip (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Here the streets and sidewalks were aligned using official geodesic data. Please do not realign features using Bing or other aerial imagery, since most fo the time, they are not alilgned correctly and need an offset. Thanks! commented 2025-11-22 12:21:53 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦446 |
| 174951245 (Comments: 1) | Noah Filip (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! On Île-des-Soeurs, your changes removed a crossing which is there and even has a tactile paving (des Parulines/de la Pointe Sud) and the crossing for bicycle was also removed, making it impossible for bicycles to reach Rue des Parulines usi... commented 2025-11-22 12:15:11 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦446 |
| 171678044 (Comments: 1) | Valec (Discussed changesets: 18) | Zdravim, dakujem za udrziavanie IDS K. V Kvetoslavove sa Vam podarilo prepisat nazvy zastavok na cislo zony 111, napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3893604750 . Opravil som, ale pozrite, ci sa to nestalo aj v inych obciach. commented 2025-11-22 12:05:53 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 174928424 (Comments: 1) | MKeano (Discussed changesets: 1) | Deleted this object. This seems to be a fake addition of an AED (operator lol, phone lol). Please do not add imaginary objects to the map or do not use the live map for testing purposes. commented 2025-11-22 12:01:45 UTC by ValidDistress ♦11 |
| 174968208 (Comments: 1) | 10201 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174969904 commented 2025-11-22 12:01:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174974392 (Comments: 2) | Tsur Halamish (Discussed changesets: 69) | עשית מדריך טוב. תודה! השינויים שאני עשיתי התבססו על מפת חום של סטראבה. התצא היה כרקע כללי. commented 2025-11-22 12:00:00 UTC by Tsur Halamish ♦57 |
| 128022374 (Comments: 1) | Valec (Discussed changesets: 18) | Zdravim, co su tie cisla v znackach 'ref', ktore ste pridali na zastavkach v Kvetoslavove? commented 2025-11-22 11:57:44 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 174748022 (Comments: 3) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 34) | I removed those highway=pedestrian assignments from the large areas, done with changeset 174984895 commented 2025-11-22 11:49:57 UTC by michael63 ♦10 |
| 174984222 (Comments: 1) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 126) | und auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5062470 commented 2025-11-22 11:29:53 UTC by Piagno ♦115 |
| 174949487 (Comments: 6) | Koffieboer (Discussed changesets: 9) | OK. Dat van de bezorgdiensten is een logisch argument ook. Dank commented 2025-11-22 11:29:22 UTC by Koffieboer ♦5 |
| 174982674 (Comments: 4) | Cocohae (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok thanks. will try to use OSM app next time then commented 2025-11-22 11:29:17 UTC by Cocohae ♦1 |
| 174967862 (Comments: 2) | 5bp (Discussed changesets: 2) | @5bp I restored the POI which you added for Five Boroughs Pizza when I reverted the nodes you accidentally dragged in your previous edit. commented 2025-11-22 11:24:11 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,658 |
| 174679968 (Comments: 4) | kapazao (Discussed changesets: 72) | He añadido amenity=university a los campus universitarias y con eso debería ser suficiente. He leído varias veces el etiquetado de las universidades en general y me sigue pareciendo algo confuso en algunos puntos, sin tener en cu... commented 2025-11-22 11:16:05 UTC by kapazao ♦943 |
| 174914959 (Comments: 1) | ironspock (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hallo ironspock, mit dieser Änderung hast Du zwei Garagen in der Plaudergartenstraße 44 gelöscht. Warum? In ALKIS sind die zwar nicht eingezeichnet. Aber bei einem Blick auf das Luftbild sind die Garagen zu sehen. Aus&s... commented 2025-11-22 10:52:53 UTC by Gino-52 ♦77 |
| 174981103 (Comments: 3) | TomVld (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aangepast met uitzondering voor fietsers commented 2025-11-22 10:52:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174962332 (Comments: 3) | OriginalRandomUser (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for fixing, HellMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174982235 commented 2025-11-22 10:48:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174982779 (Comments: 1) | Jordi MF_import (Discussed changesets: 11) | Deixe el node damunt de la urbanització a efectes de facilitar la navegació a la zona on s'acumulen més cases. Però la partida de la Baiona Baixa inclou una àrea més gran que la zona habitada. commented 2025-11-22 10:47:00 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,702 |
| 174980205 (Comments: 3) | granitschädel (Discussed changesets: 14) | There was huge trunk discussion, definition was changed. There is still huge ongoing discussion. Thanks for reminder about English translations! It seems that these pages were not updated - can you post link if you have it handy? (I... commented 2025-11-22 10:45:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 174936743 (Comments: 1) | OriginalRandomUser (Discussed changesets: 4) | Couple you please check the tagging for the ways leading to the bandstand/estrāde. Informal paths are path in unplanned locations that have formed by people walking through location they are not expected to walk (like the correct ones in courtyards ... commented 2025-11-22 10:39:23 UTC by HellMap ♦758 |
| 174778188 (Comments: 1) | Thibaultmol (Discussed changesets: 32) | 👏 commented 2025-11-22 10:37:43 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦417 |
| 167011906 (Comments: 3) | Gilbert84 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Entendido y gracias por la corrección. Un saludo commented 2025-11-22 10:34:54 UTC by kapazao ♦943 |
| 174939410 (Comments: 1) | OriginalRandomUser (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, When drawing road areas, they have to match the same designation (residential, service, tertiary, etc.) as the main road way. These are additional elements to describe the exact road geometry, but they always have to match the main road... commented 2025-11-22 10:32:41 UTC by HellMap ♦758 |
| 174981585 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 113) | Mało to jednak dało xD commented 2025-11-22 10:29:43 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
| 129621303 (Comments: 3) | filip182 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dakujem commented 2025-11-22 10:18:05 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 174977863 (Comments: 1) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nh 6 ner Yavatmal Maharashtra India commented 2025-11-22 10:14:01 UTC by nitin PVT LTD ♦3 |
| 169255333 (Comments: 6) | moloko67 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Frank. Ups - da war ich wohl schneller. Im Bereich der Seewiese (Reit im Winkl) finden sich noch ein paar Gebäudenamen mit "ehem." Darüber sollte man nochmal nachdenken. Grüße kre777 commented 2025-11-22 10:12:16 UTC by kre777 ♦11 |
| 170540354 (Comments: 1) | Billboa (Discussed changesets: 23) | Moin! Du hast hier https://www.osm.org/way/1078745271 anscheinend mit StreetComplete ein cycleway:both=separate ergänzt. Was ist da schief gegangen? Der Nebenweg ist ein Gehweg+Radverkehr frei und auch nur rechts vorhanden. Kann aber sein,... commented 2025-11-22 10:11:01 UTC by GerdP ♦2,789 |
| 174963257 (Comments: 3) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 28) | и вообще, большая часть их уже отмечена, вот образец, как сделано по всему городу: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12152094160 commented 2025-11-22 10:08:56 UTC by literan ♦6,878 |
| 174962237 (Comments: 1) | YSHDIGITAL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please don't misuse OSM tags to add dozens of keywords to businesses. 50 'service' tags with different versions of the same term is not reasonable. Please make sure that you stick to the tags offered by the editor, and only ... commented 2025-11-22 09:54:34 UTC by mueschel ♦6,730 |
| 174974736 (Comments: 1) | jack walker2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 全国大部分地区基本都没什么人画的 commented 2025-11-22 09:50:11 UTC by Taksine ♦132 |
| 173871982 (Comments: 1) | Artur Wierniewski (Discussed changesets: 28) | Dodawanie landuse=residential budynkowi nie ma żadnego sensu. Wyspa landuse w landuse ma sens, jeśli enklawę da się opisać innymi tagami np. osiedle zamknięte w większym osiedlu. Budynek bez grodzenia nie można nazwać takim osiedlem. Skasowa... commented 2025-11-22 09:49:49 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
| 174971648 (Comments: 1) | Seandebasti (Discussed changesets: 106) | Indicas que este changeset "resuelve notas". ¿Puedes indicar por favor cuál es la nota que indica que la iglesia way/424878769 está en ruinas? Te invito a utilizar un changeset diferente por cada nota que corr... commented 2025-11-22 09:37:40 UTC by Dani CS ♦72 |
| 174932708 (Comments: 2) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | merci beaucoup voilà c'est fait commented 2025-11-22 09:32:53 UTC by eurelien ♦7 |
| 174925339 (Comments: 5) | skotek (Discussed changesets: 9) | In der Tat sieht man auf StreetView keine Verbotsschilder...sogar ein Fahrzeug, das gerade einen U-turn macht. Ich sehe hier auch keinen Grund für eine Zugangsbeschränkung. commented 2025-11-22 09:21:27 UTC by limes11 ♦967 |
 | 174902207 (Comments: 1) | Pebimo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi there, you requested a review. With you having checked the way in person (source: survey) and judging from the aerials, this looks fine. Thanks for fixing this. One thing: Please write your comment either in the predominant lo... commented 2025-11-22 09:11:52 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,702 |
| 29557179 (Comments: 1) | åèé¼ èç±³èé´¨ (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333382043 請問這裡名稱真得是「一個平帆的窩嗎？如果非公共資訊將被移除 commented 2025-11-22 09:10:19 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,522 |
| 174979998 (Comments: 2) | Salt Lake SEO Raptor (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Digital marketing agency near Salt Lake" commented 2025-11-22 09:09:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174972642 (Comments: 3) | Seandebasti (Discussed changesets: 106) | If it's about attributing the map images, we can find a better labeling method that isn't deprecated; I'll check with the Spanish group. https://t.me/OSMes/171117 commented 2025-11-22 09:04:21 UTC by aTarom ♦841 |
| 174312598 (Comments: 1) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 10) | E commented 2025-11-22 09:03:02 UTC by nitin PVT LTD ♦3 |
| 174961135 (Comments: 2) | OriginalRandomUser (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the assist! Ill keep that in mind (Joined 3 days ago, did some mapping at work while nothings going on, and now I'm a bit addicted). commented 2025-11-22 08:50:20 UTC by OriginalRandomUser ♦1 |
| 174938512 (Comments: 1) | Kyra Quistler - GER (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Mrs. Sporty ist hier seit 8 Jahren eingetragen. Dieser Doppeleintrag wird gelöscht. Gruß, Znaika https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4767880744/history commented 2025-11-22 08:39:50 UTC by Znaika ♦128 |
| 174966790 (Comments: 1) | Muriel Finger Sitters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4270102194 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-11-22 08:12:45 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174972325 (Comments: 1) | Gus16 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-22 08:04:37 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174971837 (Comments: 1) | Nissa Frantz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-11-22 08:04:33 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174972353 (Comments: 1) | willoverbeing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please add more information to the church https://www.osm.org/node/4568741007 (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship) commented 2025-11-22 07:58:05 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
 | 174973574 (Comments: 1) | Yab1roud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this changeset removed the name:ar and name:en tag. Also the new added name seems less accurate for this intercity road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18666182 Could you please share the source for this change? Thanks for... commented 2025-11-22 07:57:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174930325 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | дублирование адреса https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174915534 commented 2025-11-22 07:53:16 UTC by dypa ♦148 |
| 174933958 (Comments: 1) | Samprit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't add fiction or duplicated highways to OSM. Thanks & Regards Bernard. commented 2025-11-22 07:41:49 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 174976578 (Comments: 1) | MacabreCrush (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please use for the value of addr:state the uppercase value (GA instead of Ga). commented 2025-11-22 07:37:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174962500 (Comments: 1) | LevanGo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi! Since from the side of Tkhinvala (Tbilisi) these roads have different names, apparently we need to use name:left and name:right... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452689451 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391859295 commented 2025-11-22 07:36:33 UTC by yelisey90 ♦199 |
 | 173806333 (Comments: 4) | mapperaid (Discussed changesets: 7) | Those segments are the ways leading to the motorway entrances/exits and are not fenced, freely accessible, etc like the motorway itself. So it seems like the trunk level fits them better. However, if you want, you can proceed to upgrade them to the m... commented 2025-11-22 07:23:16 UTC by mapperaid ♦5 |
| 174463085 (Comments: 2) | Roberto Riccardo Reale (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Alice Roberto, this error still exits, can you please fix this? Guido commented 2025-11-22 07:22:39 UTC by gscholz ♦2,797 |
 | 174971583 (Comments: 1) | SithMaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi SithMaster, the tag 'building:part' was the correct one here. Can you please change it back? Thanks and regards Rene commented 2025-11-22 06:48:35 UTC by rene78 ♦462 |
| 174976886 (Comments: 2) | Bùi Việt Thắng (Discussed changesets: 1) | Đây là một bình luận mẫu dựa trên chỉnh sửa bản đồ của bạn: "Thêm quán cà phê với chi tiết tòa nhà và tên" (Auto-translation) ---... commented 2025-11-22 06:47:15 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174952302 (Comments: 2) | mjjoker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Berechtigter Hinweis, bei so einfachen "Punkte hinzufügen" fällt es mir manchmal schwer sinnvolle Kommentare zu finden commented 2025-11-22 06:37:37 UTC by mjjoker ♦1 |
| 143603613 (Comments: 5) | desk77 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Теперь адрес хозяйственного здания https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99686656 дублирует адрес общежития https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227570212 commented 2025-11-22 06:34:57 UTC by acsd ♦109 |
| 165527792 (Comments: 5) | padvinder (Discussed changesets: 232) | Klopt.. Bedankt voor je reactie. Mvg.. eggie commented 2025-11-22 06:01:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 167725747 (Comments: 2) | katpatuka (Discussed changesets: 122) | What is the meaning of "།" ? I notice it written with and without it... commented 2025-11-22 05:48:31 UTC by katpatuka ♦201 |
| 174976023 (Comments: 1) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 77) | the tracks i have deleted have no sign of existence commented 2025-11-22 05:45:34 UTC by cubbe8 ♦68 |
| 174807620 (Comments: 1) | Bella01 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Rampa izmedju Vojvode Tankosića i Maksima Gorkog - nema prolaza za vozila. commented 2025-11-22 05:11:36 UTC by Bella01 ♦2 |
| 95763029 (Comments: 2) | Hedaja (Discussed changesets: 33) | Oha, das ist schon wieder länger her, konnte es aber doch noch nachvollziehen. Hatte die Infos schriftlich von jemanden anderen erhalten 😅 Das was ich als Hallen eingezeichnet hatte ist wirklich ein Reitplatz und daneben ist das Gebäu... commented 2025-11-22 04:27:05 UTC by Hedaja ♦137 |
| 174972556 (Comments: 1) | ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (Discussed changesets: 5) | If there are any errors on this update, please let me know as otherwise what ive done here would be inaccurate. This is the website where i sourced my edit in. It is already built as of now ---> https://getinvolved.london.ca/eastlondonlink commented 2025-11-22 02:38:55 UTC by ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist ♦10 |
| 158755201 (Comments: 1) | RedSkies (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, it looks like this changeset removed indigenous names from the main name=* tag of each of these boundary relations and place points. (The indigenous names were already in the corresponding name:*=* tags.) I realize this changeset was a while ago,... commented 2025-11-22 02:05:07 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦588 |
| 148277140 (Comments: 1) | Skyline1649 (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks for fixing up those school buildings! looks awesome commented 2025-11-22 01:41:55 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦41 |
| 174963581 (Comments: 1) | Plinius Meterson (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, Dieses Regenrückhaltebecken existiert hier unterirdisch. Vielleicht ist das Tagging verbesserbar, aber existieren tut es definitiv. commented 2025-11-22 01:18:40 UTC by Bienson ♦362 |
| 174922165 (Comments: 3) | DFW-Backyard7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | You actually bring up a good point, I wonder of "OKC Ring" is the official name or if it's just a nameless object. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2025-11-22 01:18:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 174970153 (Comments: 1) | bikerguy12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18988 commented 2025-11-22 00:48:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174970767 (Comments: 1) | Wojtaz123! (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-22 00:40:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 125833392 (Comments: 2) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 306) | I think it's fixed now. commented 2025-11-22 00:30:34 UTC by b-unicycling ♦254 |
| 174931879 (Comments: 1) | WaMotorcycles (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174931879 commented 2025-11-22 00:25:43 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174931850 (Comments: 1) | WaMotorcycles (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174931850 commented 2025-11-22 00:25:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174969044 (Comments: 1) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 6) | Oops I meant City of Mountain Park, not Hickory Park. :-) commented 2025-11-22 00:23:58 UTC by shinterro ♦8 |
| 174933403 (Comments: 2) | likeToTravel (Discussed changesets: 3) | huh? idu commented 2025-11-22 00:18:08 UTC by likeToTravel ♦12 |
| 174907604 (Comments: 2) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, user_5359! My name is Oscar Medinilla and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. You are right, I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my edits. I really appreciate your help by bringing this mistake to our attention. I remov... commented 2025-11-22 00:04:25 UTC by oscarm_lyft ♦1 |
| 166946409 (Comments: 1) | AYT04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Approximately how long ago was this? commented 2025-11-22 00:02:41 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦126 |
| 171157888 (Comments: 1) | AYT04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed - vandalism commented 2025-11-21 23:55:32 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦126 |
| 174969830 (Comments: 1) | stst415 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Typo. It should be "as well as Tierra Rejada Valley which is the...." commented 2025-11-21 23:41:18 UTC by stst415 ♦14 |
| 174969644 (Comments: 1) | bikerguy12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted CS174969644, 174969562 - Vandalism commented 2025-11-21 23:38:58 UTC by eerib ♦211 |
| 174969562 (Comments: 1) | bikerguy12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted CS174969644, 174969562 - Vandalism commented 2025-11-21 23:38:49 UTC by eerib ♦211 |
| 174967839 (Comments: 2) | 5bp (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174968363 commented 2025-11-21 23:35:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174945805 (Comments: 2) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo Flo, die Durchfahrt ist tatsächlich sehr schmal und dort steht auch ein entsprechendes Verkehrszeichen (traffic_sign=DE:264[1.9]). Mit normalen Autos kommt man zwar noch durch, aber ein fettes SUV oder ein Transporter hat wahrscheinlich Pr... commented 2025-11-21 23:32:35 UTC by Biff ♦16 |
| 174057993 (Comments: 4) | vicente lopez 2021 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hola! Gracias por la respuesta! La información que brinda el municipio es que arregló la calle miguel david, pero recién se firmó un acuerdo para la obra de la autopista en septiembre, no hay otra novedad de que est&ea... commented 2025-11-21 23:27:35 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦129 |
 | 174961549 (Comments: 1) | Ángel J Romero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is https://osm.org/way/1452684303 an exclave of https://osm.org/relation/3449334. In this case please use the role 'inner'. commented 2025-11-21 23:19:20 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
| 174969239 (Comments: 1) | Cycology Bikes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Your edit is incomplete. Please add other tags and update the correct way. Please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants Happy mapping, Edwin Comino https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-11-21 23:18:06 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174298318 (Comments: 1) | Samu18000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je suis tombé sur votre profil par hasard en rajoutant les noms de voies. Je vous ai envoyé un message de bienvenue. Si vous travaillez effectivement au Samu du Cher, ca sent l'intervention dans la maison partag&eac... commented 2025-11-21 23:16:33 UTC by gendy54 ♦603 |
| 174969248 (Comments: 1) | Bauxite (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je me rends compte, après avoir finalisé la modification, que je ne l’ai pas bien commentée, l’ayant justifiée sans la décrire. Pour clarifier les choses : la modification consistait en la suppre... commented 2025-11-21 23:15:42 UTC by Bauxite ♦1 |
| 174922839 (Comments: 5) | RoadRunnerNSEW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dann bitte aus der passenden Quelle zitieren, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified: "Der Teil von highway=unclassified mit erheblichen Durchgangsverkehr sollte möglichst bis zur nächsten unclassified od... commented 2025-11-21 22:58:08 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174955630 (Comments: 2) | Grandpa Steve (Discussed changesets: 1) | This road does not exist. It needs to be removed. Check against Google Maps. Delivery people are being sent down this road that is not there commented 2025-11-21 22:57:26 UTC by Grandpa Steve ♦1 |
| 128368704 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 20) | This changeset has been reverted in Changeset 174967866. See changeset comment in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174967866 commented 2025-11-21 22:28:59 UTC by Frank Peng ♦38 |
| 174623684 (Comments: 1) | HBFJ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello HBFJ, I see you have opened both lanes of GO-213 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792932624) and adjacent highways such as GO-139 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450379135) which were set as bidirectional until construction is complete. ... commented 2025-11-21 22:17:17 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦72 |
| 174937487 (Comments: 1) | borovac (Discussed changesets: 62) | Thank you commented 2025-11-21 21:18:17 UTC by Molandfreak ♦18 |
| 174964823 (Comments: 1) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 162) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13322787987 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-11-21 21:01:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 174889773 (Comments: 1) | capybara9045 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, 'Motoway' is used to denote a divided, fully access controlled highway (aka, a freeway) in the US. Please see here for California specifically: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelin... commented 2025-11-21 20:51:11 UTC by btwhite92 ♦102 |
| 174739663 (Comments: 3) | Suricata (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hei Uwe, ...ich hab mal geschaut... Kartendienste wie z.B. https://maps.arcanum.com/de/map/europe-19century-secondsurvey/?layers=osm%2C158&bbox=1463627.0957438773%2C6724375.880157913%2C1478732.9634587355%2C6730643.716477298 kennen d... commented 2025-11-21 20:24:00 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,100 |
| 168292919 (Comments: 2) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hi! This edit was made based on the discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-stop-aggiunta-di-bus-yes/127800/8 and the posts by ToniE, developer of PTNA, who I trust knows PTv2 better than me! I don't feel too strongly on i... commented 2025-11-21 20:19:52 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦114 |
| 174446376 (Comments: 2) | Глеб (Discussed changesets: 56) | 👍 commented 2025-11-21 20:12:11 UTC by Глеб ♦141 |
| 174963600 (Comments: 1) | rohieb (Discussed changesets: 46) | Gaah, falsch! https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4913255 ist nur Quelle für die Kamera auf dem Gleis; die Kameras im Tunnel sind source=survey und der Auslöser dafür war https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3547734 commented 2025-11-21 19:58:18 UTC by rohieb ♦125 |
| 174817516 (Comments: 10) | EditDatGIS (Discussed changesets: 1) | I didn’t realize mapillary existed so I’ll use that. commented 2025-11-21 19:56:16 UTC by EditDatGIS ♦1 |
| 174717413 (Comments: 1) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 52) | Follow-up discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4961610 commented 2025-11-21 19:53:37 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦114 |
| 174717337 (Comments: 3) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 52) | Follow-up discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4961610 commented 2025-11-21 19:53:27 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦114 |
| 173824460 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 47) | Theo các thẻ trong bộ thay đổi, bạn đã tra cứu lớp Esri để thực hiện các thay đổi này. Tuy nhiên, trong lớp Esri, các mương này vẫn còn tồn tại. Tại sao bạn ... commented 2025-11-21 19:50:34 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦588 |
| 174322251 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 47) | Chào bạn, bộ thay đổi này xóa nhiều tòa nhà và đối tượng khác: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174322251 Bạn có nhớ tại sao cân phải xóa các đối tư... commented 2025-11-21 19:45:07 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦588 |
| 174903803 (Comments: 2) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 400) | Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. You can also follow the link on the key opening_hours. We write the time in 24-hour notation and do not abbreviate minutes or hours. commented 2025-11-21 19:43:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174835853 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 115) | sure, and that's good. we can definitely use one. couple things to note: * passes/mountains shouldn't be moved unless there is a reason - we've been trying to get these aligned with the latest 3dep lidar scans, which are unli... commented 2025-11-21 19:36:41 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦118 |
| 174852218 (Comments: 1) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-21 19:33:56 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174957097 (Comments: 1) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-21 19:33:20 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174957586 (Comments: 1) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-21 19:33:12 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174957347 (Comments: 1) | Tyrone_1111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-11-21 19:32:39 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174959880 (Comments: 1) | Rapsak1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-11-21 19:30:58 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174961925 (Comments: 1) | 02826029060144502929130510688614624 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-11-21 19:29:48 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174698132 (Comments: 1) | Tymur_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD commented 2025-11-21 19:29:08 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174962503 (Comments: 1) | Tymur_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD commented 2025-11-21 19:28:56 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174382473 (Comments: 1) | knap_inez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! It's forbidden to copy from Google, more info in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google Your changesets were reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174962340 --- <... commented 2025-11-21 19:17:57 UTC by infeeeee ♦608 |
| 174959947 (Comments: 1) | Kaiser Julian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkung zu den von dir erfassten Hydranten: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren un... commented 2025-11-21 19:00:29 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174217209 (Comments: 1) | f_laszlo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Szia! Facebook oldalak címét nem a website hanem contact:facebook mezőben tároljuk. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook További jó térképezést! commented 2025-11-21 18:52:16 UTC by infeeeee ♦608 |
| 152132474 (Comments: 1) | redsxfenway (Discussed changesets: 2) | in JOSM I get error that the path cannot have foot=designated and bicycle=designated. I believe this path is used more for hiking bc it's unpaved. Either way, one of the tags should be set to =yes or both of them. commented 2025-11-21 18:36:34 UTC by lynx777 ♦3 |
| 172403416 (Comments: 1) | enterprise1995 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ohh danke! Die fehlerhaften Grundrisse haben mich schon länger gestört, und ich hatte schon vor, den Brandschutzplan an einem der Pfeiler in der Empfangshalle als Grundlage zu nehmen :D commented 2025-11-21 18:25:30 UTC by rohieb ♦125 |
| 174886297 (Comments: 2) | TaklamakanDesert (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello ilias_! Thanks for reaching out! I will go ahead and remove access=private tagging and change the barrier=gate to barrier=lift_gate. Happy mapping! commented 2025-11-21 18:25:00 UTC by TaklamakanDesert ♦2 |
| X | 174861715 (Comments: 1) | Sawyer777 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't edit in the US and in Somalia in the same changeset 🙏 commented 2025-11-21 18:21:58 UTC by ilias_ ♦344 |
| 174630586 (Comments: 5) | GivorsCanal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you! commented 2025-11-21 18:18:36 UTC by GivorsCanal ♦2 |
 | 174864956 (Comments: 2) | ErieCanal (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, It does not appear this segment was deleted. I made an alignment to this. Have a nice day! commented 2025-11-21 18:13:38 UTC by ErieCanal ♦3 |
| 121040070 (Comments: 4) | ITineris (Discussed changesets: 71) | Elővettem a trackeket. A Bohóc kúttól délre nem volt meg az RTK vétel. (Futókör, körönd, Magyar Zene Háza körüli gumók rendben.) Ugyanakkor azt látom, hogy a ... commented 2025-11-21 18:07:36 UTC by ITineris ♦395 |
| 172215391 (Comments: 3) | Tjuro (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hey Tjuro, Sorry, mijn changeset comments zijn altijd nogal droog. Ik bedoel er geen toon mee te zetten. Het is op zich natuurlijk correct, maar mocht je de vorm van de hele site nog kennen, dan is alle tags op een outline wel waardevol. Mvg... commented 2025-11-21 17:59:10 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 167254495 (Comments: 4) | itsblakebelcher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Several pages identify NAGB as a museum: https://nagb.org.bs/about/mission-vision-values/ https://nagb.org.bs/about/ https://nagb.org.bs/faqs/ commented 2025-11-21 17:56:59 UTC by itsblakebelcher ♦1 |
| 174959387 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Danke :) commented 2025-11-21 17:52:11 UTC by rohieb ♦125 |
| 129534082 (Comments: 5) | conifermapper (Discussed changesets: 96) | Absolutely, this relation is just a set of peaks, exactly what @jpennycook mentioned: "Relations are not categories" commented 2025-11-21 17:50:25 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦223 |
| 161643488 (Comments: 3) | FrancescaMaggiori (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao. Aggiungo una nota: il nome che hai attribuito è relativo a un poligono molto esteso, che probabilmente non corrisponde per intero all'area che avevi in mente. Puoi vederlo meglio qui: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-v... commented 2025-11-21 17:36:33 UTC by dp7 ♦57 |
| 174453722 (Comments: 2) | aetius (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bonjour - 1) OSM est nu pour le relief ce qui est inadmissible : beaucoup explorent en terrain sauvage et c'est un élément de sécurité de savoir la disposition des barres. 2) avec le Lidar commented 2025-11-21 17:36:21 UTC by aetius ♦13 |
| 174926490 (Comments: 4) | nmac85 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Thanks nmac! Your quick turnaround is greatly appreciated. commented 2025-11-21 17:31:11 UTC by b-jazz ♦761 |
| 174847601 (Comments: 1) | DriesO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, There is a problem with this edit. Even if the tram tracks have just been removed, they are still on the GRB reference map of the Flemish Region and they are used by tram relations. The good practice on OSM is to change the tags instead ... commented 2025-11-21 17:22:07 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 174810411 (Comments: 2) | Pan_Nug (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Tatfahren, Thank you for your feedback and reminder to check the tagging variations between consecutive segments. I have made the corrections and will be more aware of this in my future edits. commented 2025-11-21 17:13:50 UTC by Pan_Nug ♦7 |
| 173879481 (Comments: 2) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi norgis, Instead of deleting an object, I should have updated its classification and tag as a path instead. The bridge is clearly visible. Changeset reverted and the roads are classified as paths. Please let me know it is OK with you too. commented 2025-11-21 17:07:51 UTC by Nar_ach ♦12 |
| 174673424 (Comments: 1) | Marcel1232314733 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Do you have any sources or reasoning as to why the deletion of this construction area was made? commented 2025-11-21 16:39:45 UTC by kguenther24 ♦24 |
| 174956714 (Comments: 1) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 9) | Additional sources: https://www.bpxv.hu/sites/default/files/2025-02/ajanlatteli_felkeres_bringabox.pdf https://palotah.hu/2025/04/11/uj-kerekpartarolo-kerult-atadasra-a-xv-keruletben-%F0%9F%9A%B4%E2%99%82%EF%B8%8F/ commented 2025-11-21 16:39:13 UTC by qstep ♦10 |
| 174956258 (Comments: 1) | tyr_asd (Discussed changesets: 51) | the second source link should have been https://news.provinz.bz.it/de/news/zughaltestelle-st-jakob-schwierigste-bauphase-abgeschlossen which is much more informative than the pre-announcement press release commented 2025-11-21 16:34:56 UTC by tyr_asd ♦449 |
| 170751176 (Comments: 1) | HBFJ (Discussed changesets: 2) | HBFJ, Notei que tu adicionou código de rodovia à tag name=*, como em name=BR-070 É preciso observar que cada tag no OSM serve para um propósito. A tag name serve para se colocar o nome próprio da rodov... commented 2025-11-21 16:33:53 UTC by santamariense ♦829 |
| 174952391 (Comments: 1) | tacoparts (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-11-21 16:29:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174952603 (Comments: 1) | tacoparts (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-11-21 16:29:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174954421 (Comments: 1) | SimonHarms (Discussed changesets: 6) | Derzeit scheinbar leer und wird gerade renoviert. commented 2025-11-21 16:24:29 UTC by SimonHarms ♦7 |
| 173070575 (Comments: 1) | chrispace (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just so you know, you seem to have accidentally marked the river channel as a storage tank. I have fixed it, but do be careful with your edits. commented 2025-11-21 16:23:54 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦8 |
| 174956122 (Comments: 1) | piligab (Discussed changesets: 30) | ruiim commented 2025-11-21 16:23:28 UTC by Gustav Maps ♦4 |
| 174956099 (Comments: 1) | achauhan_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ruim commented 2025-11-21 16:23:02 UTC by Gustav Maps ♦4 |
| 174818187 (Comments: 7) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 113) | Myślę, że jedno building:part w obrębie dwóch różnych budynków to byłby błąd. Ale nie wiem, co zaproponować w zamian. Wstawić 'Pasaż Kultury' w brand=* dla galerii i Domu Otwartego? Bo w sum... commented 2025-11-21 15:56:51 UTC by Rogoyski ♦237 |
| 174850287 (Comments: 3) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 113) | Dzięki. I tak, ja od dość dawna kasuję takie użycia, jak natrafię. Głównie autorstwa @syntex sprzed już kilku lat ;) commented 2025-11-21 15:53:13 UTC by Rogoyski ♦237 |
| 174938245 (Comments: 3) | Nieselpriem (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich hatte die Stockwerke von 9 auf 11 angepasst. commented 2025-11-21 15:47:29 UTC by Nieselpriem ♦1 |
| 174877763 (Comments: 10) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 17) | and let me know commented 2025-11-21 15:31:11 UTC by Lola Fox ♦37 |
| 171849120 (Comments: 3) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 123) | De bouw is in maart stilgelegd. Zie https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2025/03/27/bouw-corda-arena-stilgelegd-na-vernietiging-vergunning/ Er is een nieuwe vergunning aangevraagd waarover deze maand november een uitspraak zou gedaan worden https://www.hbvl... commented 2025-11-21 15:17:24 UTC by Eebie ♦139 |
| 85971126 (Comments: 1) | gutpablo3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Le point 7571728626 semble mal positionné : dans les bois là il n'y a aucun local commercial Auriez-vous la possibilité de vérifier sa position ? Merci commented 2025-11-21 15:01:30 UTC by MaxR_6429 ♦23 |
| 174951407 (Comments: 1) | bezkraen (Discussed changesets: 1) | STREET Gospod NEED BELIVE commented 2025-11-21 14:59:23 UTC by bezkraen ♦1 |
| 174917901 (Comments: 1) | Tomkow1933 (Discussed changesets: 25) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-21 14:53:26 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 169918992 (Comments: 5) | moloko67 (Discussed changesets: 5) | hallo David, endlich konnte ich nun den "Heimat- und Geschichtsverein Achental e.V.", der die Almendatenbank erstellt hatte, erreichen. Der Vorsitzende hat mir erlaubt, die Daten zu nutzen, um die Almnamen in OSM einzutragen. ... commented 2025-11-21 14:46:13 UTC by moloko67 ♦5 |
| 174937932 (Comments: 5) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 14) | Jeg observerede de fysiske rutemarkører for lidt siden. De findes både på stien langs åen og inde i skoven. Det er ændret sådan at hærvejen i nordgående retning følger skovruten, mens sydgå... commented 2025-11-21 14:44:47 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦25 |
| 174878135 (Comments: 3) | DWA60187 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply unfortunately it was kind of hard to figure what you intentionally removed and what was unintentional so this whole change set was reverted. Feel free to take another shot. So only remove tags that are untrue now, like pla... commented 2025-11-21 14:37:44 UTC by MassCartog ♦244 |
| 151227037 (Comments: 1) | JL_Kenner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich bitte es künftig zu unterlassen, hier fiktive Straßennamen einzufügen, die weder im Liegenschaftskataster vergeben noch vor Ort entsprechend mit Schildern gekennzeichnet sind. commented 2025-11-21 14:26:48 UTC by bwbuz ♦55 |
| 174949562 (Comments: 2) | EjsmontPiotr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dzięki. Duplikaty zostały usunięte commented 2025-11-21 14:08:31 UTC by EjsmontPiotr ♦1 |
| 155384064 (Comments: 6) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 246) | O ja, ik had me vergist in het gebied. Duidelijk, bedankt. commented 2025-11-21 13:51:29 UTC by Peter Elderson ♦152 |
 | 174943803 (Comments: 4) | Silvana R (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. FYI. Please vi... commented 2025-11-21 13:45:40 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174883120 (Comments: 2) | GnykT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I fixed the sidewalk. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174949465 Thank you for mapping Japan. commented 2025-11-21 13:45:12 UTC by Smokin' Billy ♦8 |
| 174947125 (Comments: 3) | Lucie999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers... commented 2025-11-21 13:45:02 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174946279 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 74) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-21 13:42:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 174943589 (Comments: 5) | OSM_HE (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-21 13:42:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 174947522 (Comments: 1) | Lana T (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Don't oversize the buildings. They have an overhanging roof, the... commented 2025-11-21 13:38:15 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174707041 (Comments: 4) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Yeah, you're right. Carry on then! My only question is, do you want me to let you know when this happens or just fix it silently? By the way, I'm more worried about mistakes that no one will catch, not the ones that I can fix. But I ... commented 2025-11-21 13:25:25 UTC by NeatNit ♦42 |
| 174948821 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 557) | Survey, not surgery commented 2025-11-21 13:24:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 173885454 (Comments: 1) | Babbe (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass "Frey-Grynaeisves" ein Tippfehler ist? Oder? commented 2025-11-21 13:20:18 UTC by Mister Kanister ♦43 |
| 171495974 (Comments: 2) | SFGJimStreet (Discussed changesets: 16) | Effectivement il y a eu fusion de deux poste de police. Bien vu 😉 commented 2025-11-21 13:16:47 UTC by SFGJimStreet ♦11 |
| 173492518 (Comments: 5) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 167) | In tegendeel, amenities slaan op het hele stuk land dat beheerd wordt door de amenity (waar mogelijk). Zie het schema op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital In Nederland merk ik wel een voorkeur om deze op punten te mappen (... commented 2025-11-21 13:09:12 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174931065 (Comments: 1) | Noah Filip (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please read this thread on the Canadian forum before changing from light rail to subway. Please revert until a concensus is found. Thanks and have a nice day! https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/montreal-rem-labeling-as-light-metro/132047/27 commented 2025-11-21 13:08:58 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦446 |
| 174868625 (Comments: 1) | Amna Hashmi (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-11-21 12:53:43 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 166518427 (Comments: 1) | LeroyLeroy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao LeroyLeroy Just a small comment. The place was already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5183654843/history since a while. I just removed your addition and tagged everything on the other node. Happy mapping, habi commented 2025-11-21 12:51:19 UTC by habi ♦1,969 |
| 173241214 (Comments: 1) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 41) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13231404684 is probably not a building? Hard to understand the background, because it appears you deleted & re-added in this huge changeset. Anyway, if you spot little chapels and so on, it helps me a lot if you... commented 2025-11-21 12:43:37 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 161078838 (Comments: 1) | smeòrach (Discussed changesets: 77) | air a' mhapa a rinn Heathar Smith airson Iomairtean na Gàidhlig, 's e "Bràigh na h-Aibhneadh an t-ainm air Kingsville agus tha Gleann Dail agus Glendale co-ionnainn. Carson a rinn thu e gu diofar? commented 2025-11-21 12:40:59 UTC by jSeke ♦14 |
| 174943737 (Comments: 1) | MathGon (Discussed changesets: 4) | This looks more like a parking-ticket machine, and not a public transport ticket machine. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1721952388483930 commented 2025-11-21 12:39:38 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 137192250 (Comments: 1) | 13hannes11 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hannes, Check out the OSM right way to tag the phone number; country - village - customer. Werner commented 2025-11-21 12:37:47 UTC by Op'tRad ♦50 |
| 174817431 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:35 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174817579 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:35 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174817725 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:34 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174817798 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:34 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174817628 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:34 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174818737 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:33 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174818969 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:33 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174820393 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:32 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174820558 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:32 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174820445 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:32 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174817344 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:31 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174801435 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:31 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174801799 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:31 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174801135 (Comments: 5) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:30 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174801294 (Comments: 1) | Pierre-Felix Breton (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG commented 2025-11-21 12:32:30 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,480 |
| 174914747 (Comments: 1) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 158) | Thank you! commented 2025-11-21 12:27:56 UTC by Planvoll ♦18 |
| 100965011 (Comments: 1) | Metacity (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, Je ne comprends pas la présence du tag "ref:INSEE=44109". Je pensais que ce tag n'avait sa place que sur la relation décrivant la commune. commented 2025-11-21 12:24:51 UTC by LudovicG ♦95 |
| 174946545 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.accessesmeralda.com/elections/index.php commented 2025-11-21 12:21:37 UTC by ieguy3 ♦12 |
| 174832757 (Comments: 2) | jkorf (Discussed changesets: 14) | shop=mall klopt hier niet inderdaad maar landuse laat ik dan op retail staan, bedankt voor de feedback. commented 2025-11-21 12:21:04 UTC by jkorf ♦9 |
| 173504100 (Comments: 4) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 109) | Thanks for that. The bridge / tunnel situation is an odd one but I would keep the current tagging. Standing on the pavement looking south-east it feels like I'm standing on a bridge, and looking at the canal going underneath it looks lik... commented 2025-11-21 11:48:59 UTC by tomhukins ♦233 |
| 174887586 (Comments: 2) | JamieJMaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. FYI. Please vi... commented 2025-11-21 11:46:17 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 170546976 (Comments: 1) | kingrollo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for improving the map. I agree there is no evidence of the road having a name, but if I heard the name "Hopton and Carson Bypass" I would assume it refers to this road. Maybe tagging it as a "loc_name" make... commented 2025-11-21 11:44:50 UTC by tomhukins ♦233 |
| 174870160 (Comments: 1) | Holly Cooper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. In general, well mapped. A few issues. Please square each rectangular building. Don't add a layer to a building to hide errors. Straw covered buildings are also subject to being mapped. Best regards commented 2025-11-21 11:42:34 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174847863 (Comments: 2) | rih890 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, thanks for the reply. Yes, i'm aware of the fact that Rīgas nami, which is a SIA under Riga city municipality, has named this place like this in their spatial developement conception last year and even found they organised one event in thi... commented 2025-11-21 11:33:34 UTC by rih890 ♦1 |
| 174936987 (Comments: 1) | santoshipanwar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | Where you added service roads here is actually a fenced off construction site, it's been like that for a couple months. It looks like they are building a building. So I don't think there are going to be roads here anymore even though relati... commented 2025-11-21 11:23:23 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦52 |
| 139334281 (Comments: 1) | the_third_man (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao dritter Mann Du hast hier dem Rechenzentrum `content=Diesel` hinzugefügt. Das macht aus meiner Sicht keinen Sinn, was war das Ziel? Gruss, Habi commented 2025-11-21 11:20:19 UTC by habi ♦1,969 |
| 174912300 (Comments: 1) | 0625shima (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's not about opinions and which side you support. Your edit is against OSM's on-the-ground rule. commented 2025-11-21 11:18:09 UTC by ChangwooRyu ♦15 |
| 174942527 (Comments: 1) | Reni St (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Rather accurately mapped. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other, and don't include the shadow of a building. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-11-21 11:17:56 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 172881343 (Comments: 1) | LievenL (Discussed changesets: 4) | The police amenity should only be mapped once; since it already existed as a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4455169220 the buildings should not have been tagged. It looks very much like the entire site is operated by the police, so I'll... commented 2025-11-21 11:14:18 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 167757632 (Comments: 2) | hoeflehner (Discussed changesets: 4) | siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Kirchbachspitze commented 2025-11-21 11:02:02 UTC by kuhni74 ♦400 |
| 167678401 (Comments: 4) | Bernhard Pranz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Das Stück Thermenradweg, dass parallel zur Badener Straße verläuft ist richtigerweise für Autos versperrt, aber die Seeligerstraße kann von Autos befahren werden und ist nicht Teil des Thermenradweges. Wie das Foto zeigt is... commented 2025-11-21 10:43:35 UTC by dshamila ♦1 |
| 174881804 (Comments: 1) | Zayd123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You oversized the building and included the shadow ! Please stay within the rooflines. The buildings have an overhanging roof. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-11-21 10:35:39 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174870173 (Comments: 1) | verena_2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please solve the warnings shown by the issu triangle before you upload your work. Don't include the shadow of a building either. Don't map a building over a highway or connect them to another object. ... commented 2025-11-21 10:33:35 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 171014792 (Comments: 2) | Tourismus Oberstdorf (Discussed changesets: 9) | Liebes Tourismus Oberstdorf-Team, ich habe den Stillachdammweg (Walserstraße bis Karatsbichlweg) wieder als highway=footway getaggt, da der Weg wie limes11 richtig schreibt entsprechend des VZ 239 nur für Fußgänger zugel... commented 2025-11-21 10:32:10 UTC by christian_plus1 ♦17 |
| 168986088 (Comments: 2) | qoro (Discussed changesets: 8) | It's a sports club independent of the school, just operating on school grounds. commented 2025-11-21 10:27:14 UTC by qoro ♦4 |
| 174722788 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 68) | It was hand-typed; afaik iD's turn restriction editor cannot input `restriction:conditional=` directly because it would just input `restriction=` which would be different from irl. commented 2025-11-21 10:26:13 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦63 |
| 174886325 (Comments: 1) | Jpenrod7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping here. Your mappings are rather accurate; however, you included the shadow of the building in your mapping. These are no part of a building. Best regards, commented 2025-11-21 10:19:54 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174514238 (Comments: 2) | qoro (Discussed changesets: 8) | Understood, I'll do that right now commented 2025-11-21 10:16:38 UTC by qoro ♦4 |
| 174927262 (Comments: 1) | Wandel-Appeltje (Discussed changesets: 34) | Dag wandel Appeltje, Alle routerelaties zijn oke. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-21 10:15:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174867069 (Comments: 1) | Greg Smith 27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You overlooked the round and rectangular straw-covered buildings (gray/brown) Map them as well at future sessions. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-11-21 10:14:58 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174867846 (Comments: 1) | Mappy Mat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please use the requested Imagery (Esri) Round buildings are also to be mapped. You ignored them here ! Please map them in future sessions as well. Best regards commented 2025-11-21 10:12:12 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174805617 (Comments: 3) | NasuFoito (Discussed changesets: 4) | Здравствуйте, извините, что не ответила, подумала, что исправить сразу будет лучше. Спасибо за замечания commented 2025-11-21 10:11:20 UTC by NasuFoito ♦3 |
| 174813875 (Comments: 4) | mactavishfr (Discussed changesets: 1) | D'accord c'est clair maintenant, merci de la précision. A vrai dire je n'était pas au courant qu'on affichait sur OSM les noms des villages et non ceux des communes (a moins de zoomer sur les frontières donc).... commented 2025-11-21 10:10:07 UTC by mactavishfr ♦1 |
| 174870150 (Comments: 1) | Marian Deopante (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-11-21 10:00:14 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174917441 (Comments: 3) | eultra (Discussed changesets: 18) | Yeah, I've used it, I do realize it's faster/more powerful but I do most of my editing during downtime at work while waiting for code to compile or tests to finish running, and I don't think I can install non-approved desktop software commented 2025-11-21 09:58:38 UTC by eultra ♦14 |
| 171175661 (Comments: 1) | Lior Stein (Discussed changesets: 2) | שלום, הוספת את אותו השם לשני רחובות סמוכים. יכול להיות שזאת טעות? א. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424122174 ב. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254821802 commented 2025-11-21 09:56:39 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 173514755 (Comments: 1) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 41) | The Musee du Folklore was bigger before your import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723499187 . Are you sure it is only in that one building? commented 2025-11-21 09:46:03 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174931812 (Comments: 1) | au-btcmap‑onboarding (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-11-21 09:45:29 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174929566 (Comments: 1) | TaklamakanDesert (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I think these barriers https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260542858 are actually private instead of permissive. It's for the apartment complex, not the school. commented 2025-11-21 09:42:57 UTC by ilias_ ♦344 |
| 172292054 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 231) | Johwie heeft het KMSKA gebouw en museum gesplitst om een of andere reden; jij hebt het dubbele POI willen opkuisen denk ik, maar het gebouw was enkel een building=museum, geen amenity=museum. Daarop heeft iemand anders het weer toegevoegd als nieuw p... commented 2025-11-21 09:39:25 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
 | 174911652 (Comments: 1) | ljubop (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13319479734. What is the mean of the tag Грабовача = heath commented 2025-11-21 09:36:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174887571 (Comments: 1) | さっぽろ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welocme to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/8591392953. What is the mean of the tag 廃駅 = 歌志内? Please notice we use british english for the keys (and values, if they are countable). commented 2025-11-21 09:34:44 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 163002006 (Comments: 2) | Fijord (Discussed changesets: 49) | Vielen Dank für deine Information. Ich habe es wieder ergänzt. Kann es sein, dass die Vorlage im JOSM es entfernt hat? commented 2025-11-21 09:31:43 UTC by Fijord ♦57 |
| 174928104 (Comments: 4) | TunnelHillRdResident (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected! We are all human beings, and human beings make mistakes, even if they are not new. Have fun with OSM! commented 2025-11-21 09:30:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174933556 (Comments: 2) | TadaiShaxia (Discussed changesets: 1) | 기존 점의 역사(수정 이력)가 날아가기 때문에 권장되는 방법은 아니지만, 점 이동이 잘 안 되는 상황이라면 문제가 되지 않습니다. 점의 역사보다는 좌표가 훨씬 중요한 정보기도 하고요. commented 2025-11-21 09:28:45 UTC by LuxuryCoop ♦111 |
| 173728733 (Comments: 2) | compass123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've moved the building tags back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174939430 and moved the monastery tags to the 'outline' of the monastery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058340048 commented 2025-11-21 09:23:14 UTC by habi ♦1,969 |
| 174487020 (Comments: 1) | vjyblauw (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hier heb je per ongeluk de highway tag verwijderd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59826214 Opgepikt dankzij Road Completion, zie https://maproulette.org/challenge/24090 commented 2025-11-21 09:10:31 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174815384 (Comments: 2) | Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (Discussed changesets: 26) | Beste Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld, Voor de give_way op uitrit had ik laatst een forum vraag gemaakt, daar was niet echt een duidelijke conclusie uit gekomen, maar toch goed om te lezen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ui... commented 2025-11-21 09:10:10 UTC by Tjuro ♦235 |
| 174870935 (Comments: 5) | brigitte31300 (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai complété avec les adresses et quelques bâtiments visible sur la photo aérienne mais encore absents du cadastre. commented 2025-11-21 09:07:52 UTC by cquest ♦275 |
| 174010595 (Comments: 3) | ArneC (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oh! Dat had ik gemist, excuses. Ik pas het aan. commented 2025-11-21 08:56:29 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174934757 (Comments: 1) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dag R van Baalen Je kunt het beste op de adresnode bijtaggen. Kijk ook in de wiki, want ook de aard van de instelling vermelden. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.. visitor_centre toegevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-21 08:55:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174934854 (Comments: 1) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | addr:city toegevoegd commented 2025-11-21 08:48:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174934940 (Comments: 1) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | addr:city toegevoegd commented 2025-11-21 08:47:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174935023 (Comments: 1) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dag RVanBaalen, De dubbele vermelding heb ik verwijderd. Alle info staat op de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-21 08:46:05 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174934659 (Comments: 1) | RVanBaalen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Engelse tekst? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-21 08:43:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174906722 (Comments: 1) | Anna-sw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nie bardzo rozumiem tą edycję. Opis jakiś niezrozumiały (masło maślane). Dlaczego w edycji usunięto odnośnik Wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16537247 oraz usunięto odnośnik do Wikipedii https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cmentar... commented 2025-11-21 08:41:47 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦571 |
| 171531671 (Comments: 2) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo habi, ich sehe gerade diesen Changeset hier. Auch ich bin der Meinung, dass man das Gebäude wieder herstellen sollte. Das Gebäude wurde vor 2 Monaten erst eingetragen - laut Informationen im GWR ist das Baujahr 2025 und laut GW... commented 2025-11-21 08:32:41 UTC by wies1 ♦171 |
| 174852089 (Comments: 3) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 12) | Salut, imi cer scuze! voi avea mai multa grija! commented 2025-11-21 08:24:43 UTC by Alex Topo ♦7 |
| 174928843 (Comments: 1) | Firefishy (Discussed changesets: 41) | Why did you remove the fax number from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376766484? commented 2025-11-21 08:23:45 UTC by Wynndale ♦57 |
| 174226884 (Comments: 5) | söm4324 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ok, danke commented 2025-11-21 08:15:06 UTC by söm4324 ♦49 |
| 174770653 (Comments: 5) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 123) | Hi João, the broken relations are now nicely visible in OSMI: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-7.50013&lat=40.13444&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_... commented 2025-11-21 08:12:46 UTC by gscholz ♦2,797 |
| 174904009 (Comments: 2) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 14) | 🤘 commented 2025-11-21 08:09:04 UTC by stillhart ♦168 |
 | 174937228 (Comments: 1) | samuelzammit (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bus route 84* commented 2025-11-21 08:08:16 UTC by samuelzammit ♦10 |
| 174895327 (Comments: 2) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 26) | Es waren Radwegschilder am östlichen ende aufgestellt, die kein Ende hatten. commented 2025-11-21 08:07:59 UTC by vikiawv ♦27 |
 | 174936890 (Comments: 2) | shreejii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added hamlet BHURAR with location name" commented 2025-11-21 08:06:38 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174653850 (Comments: 1) | Kiesgenießer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Kiesgenießer, die Änderung des operator am teilAuto-Stellplatz war leider nicht korrekt. teilAuto hat kürzlich die Geschäftsform geändert und ist jetzt nicht mehr Mobility Center GmbH sondern teilAuto eG. Ich hatte... commented 2025-11-21 07:57:36 UTC by scai ♦277 |
| 173351200 (Comments: 1) | Jožo Schwarz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Dobrý deň, ja sa cyklotrasám veľmi nerozumiem ale všimol som si že vo Vrakuni a Poddunajských je tiež relácia "Ružinovská radiála": https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957105 |
| 174911720 (Comments: 3) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 112) | OK, no problem ;-) commented 2025-11-21 07:43:12 UTC by GBAB ♦108 |
| 174896247 (Comments: 1) | ITWB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I just wanted to let you know that you inadvertently tagged a drain (Way: Beck Valley Storm Water Culvert (1094967519) as a highway underneath Way: Sneinton Dale (1452290777). This could have caused problems to routing, thus I've rever... commented 2025-11-21 07:26:10 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 168820771 (Comments: 2) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 24) | I looked at some of the ferry routes. Some of them needed more extensive work to be accurate (and probably compliant). One of the Oz moderators stuck his oar in, and I have focused on bus routes since then. There are so many bus routes I haven't... commented 2025-11-21 07:24:29 UTC by donmac703 ♦9 |
| 174924800 (Comments: 3) | RestauracjaTowarzyska (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dziękuję za odpowiedź, jak tylko siądę do komputera oznaczę to odpowiednio commented 2025-11-21 07:20:55 UTC by bartgron ♦333 |
| 160162461 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 25) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172060156#c1515009 commented 2025-11-21 07:09:42 UTC by zstadler ♦1,099 |
 | 172060038 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 25) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172060156#c1515009 commented 2025-11-21 07:09:36 UTC by zstadler ♦1,099 |
| 174934917 (Comments: 1) | BenBoss69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 21 potential crossin... commented 2025-11-21 07:02:56 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174934947 (Comments: 2) | (⌐■_■) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вот пример комментария на основе твоих правок карты: "Удален тег здания" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed building tag... commented 2025-11-21 06:56:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174760757 (Comments: 2) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi toster234, While combining the driveway connections, I realized TomTom proprietary GPS traces showed very recent vehicular activity. Thinking that the construction is completed, I removed the construction tags. Thanks a lot for the photos you p... commented 2025-11-21 06:55:28 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦37 |
| 174853771 (Comments: 3) | ginzamax (Discussed changesets: 1) | ご回答ありがとうございます。このケースでは、2つの道が共通するノードがないまま交差している状態です。もしかすると、今回のチェンジセットより前から同じ問題が存在していたの... commented 2025-11-21 06:52:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 172060156 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi Popolon, Thank you for your many contributions to OSM! In this edit you have added an "illegal settlement" value to the place tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742606938. In the description of https://www.ope... commented 2025-11-21 06:46:01 UTC by zstadler ♦1,099 |
| 174859660 (Comments: 2) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 400) | Sorry, I missed that tag in the list and thought you had removed it. Never mind. Happy mapping! commented 2025-11-21 06:23:06 UTC by pwbriggs ♦96 |
| 174934403 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://pvtimes.com/news/stretch-of-u-s-95-being-moved-for-nevada-gold-mining-project-77459 commented 2025-11-21 06:17:13 UTC by ieguy3 ♦12 |
| 174877680 (Comments: 1) | worlduser (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hey worlduser can you please review this changeset? I think it broke the Albuquerque relation, it cannot be found on Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=171262 commented 2025-11-21 06:06:59 UTC by vricciardulli ♦25 |
| 174878566 (Comments: 2) | NasuFoito (Discussed changesets: 4) | Здравствуйте, я перенесала теги в мультиполигон, мультиполигон был замкнут (проверила по таблице) Валидатор на мой мультиполигон не ру... commented 2025-11-21 06:06:08 UTC by NasuFoito ♦3 |
| 174624329 (Comments: 1) | paulbrunner (Discussed changesets: 49) | Bonjour, utilises-tu un outil pour détecter les adresse sans batiment proche ? Salutations, Marc commented 2025-11-21 05:22:51 UTC by Marc_ch ♦288 |
| 174608152 (Comments: 1) | stosh77 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Revised. commented 2025-11-21 03:14:27 UTC by stosh77 ♦43 |
| 174360866 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 115) | I agree with ZLima12. Next time, please try doing smaller and more targeted edits. When conflicts arise, that's a clear sign that too much has been changed at once and those warnings should not be ignored. commented 2025-11-21 02:38:13 UTC by TopoNick ♦1 |
| 174904231 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 900) | Thanks for the catch! One of my new custom presets had a typo that my bevy of validators didn't catch, sorry--in the process of further expanding my custom validator suite. Preset fixed going forward and also double-checked there were no other i... commented 2025-11-21 02:17:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦53 |
| 174837499 (Comments: 2) | gw010 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'll track down a hard source for this. I saw a post of Miami Dade Transit that had the max speed of the Metrorail as 58 mph. commented 2025-11-21 02:12:50 UTC by gw010 ♦1 |
| 160576767 (Comments: 1) | luziferius (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ich bitte dringend um saubere Arbeit an den destination-tags und als Vandalismus anzusehende Löschungen der von mir zuvor gesetzten destination:backward-tags zu unterlassen. commented 2025-11-21 01:55:09 UTC by bwbuz ♦55 |
| 174928952 (Comments: 1) | _Kostka_ (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-21 01:20:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 174929591 (Comments: 1) | TriangleMaple (Discussed changesets: 10) | Source: Changeset Comment (Survey) commented 2025-11-21 01:10:26 UTC by TriangleMaple ♦7 |
 | 174928053 (Comments: 2) | JT-Elki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added tourism attraction, government office, and updated names for Check Point and Paseo Turístico Natural del Cerezo en flor" commented 2025-11-21 00:36:24 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174895877 (Comments: 1) | lavineltcins (Discussed changesets: 1) | The business was already tagged but you did add more useful info. Another user merged yours with the existing data --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174895877 commented 2025-11-21 00:36:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174919694 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 441) | Après avoir regardé comment les autres magasins BioCoop étaient taggués en France, finalement c'est peut-être plus cohérent de garder le name=Biocoop (sans la majuscule au C), mais en rajoutant un branch=... commented 2025-11-21 00:34:30 UTC by jcnl44 ♦23 |
| 174829288 (Comments: 6) | FILszew (Discussed changesets: 2) | A po twojej zmianie jadąc z północy i zjeżdżając na S52 nagle masz 300 m drogi niższej klasy co jest błędniejsze Dodatkowo: gdzie dyskusja na forum przed zmianą? Nigdy nie rób zmian klasy dróg jak trunk bez dyskus... commented 2025-11-21 00:28:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 174921438 (Comments: 1) | _Kostka_ (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-21 00:11:32 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| X | 174905040 (Comments: 2) | nmac85 (Discussed changesets: 47) | appologies commented 2025-11-21 00:05:59 UTC by nmac85 ♦9 |
| 174833848 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26CSN2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The outline should match the roof - can you fix this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833848 commented 2025-11-20 23:57:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174917029 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26EB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Another dragged node - please be careful --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174917029 commented 2025-11-20 23:56:18 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174910537 (Comments: 4) | callum_tfl (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem, it's probably one of the most common misunderstandings with access tags in the UK. Generally access tags should reflect the legal situation rather than whether it's safe or appropriate for a particular access mode. Pedest... commented 2025-11-20 23:49:31 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,658 |
| 174833474 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26CD (Discussed changesets: 1) | We don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tags are sufficient --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833474 commented 2025-11-20 23:49:07 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174833710 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26JT (Discussed changesets: 1) | We don't use descriptive names, the tags are sufficient. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833710 commented 2025-11-20 23:48:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174834008 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26JZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | opening hours tag should be with times like 07:00-18:00. Then add an access=private so show it's for residents only --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174834008 commented 2025-11-20 23:45:24 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174829946 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26NRH (Discussed changesets: 1) | The walkway to the house should be a way not an area. The driveway should be a way and tagged as highway=service + service=driveway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174829946 ... commented 2025-11-20 23:42:59 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174828636 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26LDS (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. not sure what the ... commented 2025-11-20 23:39:30 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174828474 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26HL (Discussed changesets: 3) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Please - no person... commented 2025-11-20 23:35:21 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174828455 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26BLM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828455 commented 2025-11-20 23:33:30 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174828331 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26LRVH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828331 commented 2025-11-20 23:32:53 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174828324 (Comments: 1) | mshs26zoeywitt (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. The house isn'... commented 2025-11-20 23:31:29 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174828279 (Comments: 2) | MSHS26CEM (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828279 commented 2025-11-20 23:30:27 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174828087 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26AA (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: add the address to the house outline. also we don't use descriptive names like name=house. Tags are sufficient --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828087 ... commented 2025-11-20 23:27:58 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174828076 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26KendraA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you explain why you removed the place tag? It is critical for searching in OSM. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828076 commented 2025-11-20 23:24:07 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823898 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26JS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823898 commented 2025-11-20 23:21:20 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823435 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26BDK (Discussed changesets: 1) | The address should be added using the address fields. Also, the outline should match the roof. can you fix? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823435 commented 2025-11-20 23:20:03 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823380 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26LW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't add personal information to OSM. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823380 commented 2025-11-20 23:18:44 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823360 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26KyeL (Discussed changesets: 1) | We don't use descriptive names like name=field. The tags are sufficient. Also, the crop= tag should have the actual crop. Can you fix it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174... commented 2025-11-20 23:17:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174860463 (Comments: 10) | vadder-h-j (Discussed changesets: 2) | Habe die Namen der Jakobswege der verschiedenen Bundesländer verglichen. Sie enthalten alle entweder einen speziellen Eigennamen wie "Bayerisch-Schwäbischer Jakobsweg" oder den Anfangs- und Endpunkt im Namen, z. B. "Jakobsweg... commented 2025-11-20 23:16:21 UTC by vadder-h-j ♦2 |
| 174823526 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26JKI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not add personal information. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823526 commented 2025-11-20 23:16:15 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823344 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26NC2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Driveways are adde... commented 2025-11-20 23:14:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823578 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26NC2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | public transport is for city/county buses not school buses. I'd suggest removing it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823578 commented 2025-11-20 23:12:02 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823341 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26KB (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. None of the buildi... commented 2025-11-20 23:08:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174872088 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26KSD (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: The sidewalk should connect to the road at East Elto Avenue.; Fixed --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174872088 commented 2025-11-20 23:07:17 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823550 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26KSD (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: square buildings by selection the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823550 commented 2025-11-20 23:02:05 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174921851 (Comments: 2) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | Online poker club should not be on the map! commented 2025-11-20 23:00:45 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174823308 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26ZA (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. The house doesn�... commented 2025-11-20 22:57:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823215 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26QS (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: We don't use descriptive names in OSM. Can you remove the name tag from the house? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823215 commented 2025-11-20 22:56:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174578715 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 115) | Off the top of my head, I'm not sure which exact ones would be built soonest, other than some residential streets in multi-phase subdivision projects, or any other major road we know is scheduled to be built (like the Hollywood Blvd extension fo... commented 2025-11-20 22:52:38 UTC by Joseph R P ♦380 |
| 172119999 (Comments: 1) | StefanL61 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you added a 'hunting lodge' here in this changeset, however I assume you meant a 'hunting stand'. The hunting stand here is already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4107584812 I've removed the hunting lodg... commented 2025-11-20 22:51:40 UTC by Woazboat ♦86 |
| 174924607 (Comments: 2) | adrian-c137 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt, ik zal de tips eerst lezen 👌🏻 commented 2025-11-20 22:38:22 UTC by adrian-c137 ♦1 |
| 174899185 (Comments: 1) | Ankhbayar Ch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Ankhbayar Ch, I noticed you have been changing track ways to tertiary and secondary. Tertiary ways are typically used to “connect minor streets to more major roads” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary) and se... commented 2025-11-20 22:36:07 UTC by aaronq227 ♦20 |
| 172565396 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Das Haus gibt es nicht mehr! commented 2025-11-20 22:29:17 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,432 |
| X | 173241739 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 115) | Hice mi parte. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174926510 Hay unos 25 idiomas que no conozco, y se precisa mas información porque tienen distinto valor entre el nodo y la relacion. commented 2025-11-20 22:20:03 UTC by muralito ♦2,076 |
| 170621711 (Comments: 1) | kaxtillo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola Kaxtillo, con la asignación del sentido que le das a esta via, quiere decir que la panamericana esta bloqueada en el sentido hacia Popayan desde Cali, que debe tomarse una via diferente a la Panamericana? commented 2025-11-20 22:00:40 UTC by dazufecar87 ♦1 |
| 173107234 (Comments: 1) | j mello (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. In general in OSM it's better to try to edit an existing feature to its current state rather than delete a feature and create a new one. Editing an existing feature preserves history of that object, if there's ever a need to re... commented 2025-11-20 21:58:26 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,370 |
| 174923143 (Comments: 1) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | @ = not allowed commented 2025-11-20 21:58:06 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174922797 (Comments: 1) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | All capital letters. commented 2025-11-20 21:56:18 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174924564 (Comments: 3) | XioNoX (Discussed changesets: 20) | J'peux pas, les adresses m'ont tuer ;-). commented 2025-11-20 21:41:19 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 174923933 (Comments: 5) | nogger13 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Genau. Da der Rewe wieder geöffnet hat, sind die Notes nicht mehr relevant gewesen. commented 2025-11-20 21:39:46 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦36 |
| X | 174903730 (Comments: 2) | Yan Bakhmat (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oops, my bad. commented 2025-11-20 21:35:10 UTC by Yan Bakhmat ♦1 |
| 174853488 (Comments: 2) | Wittekindburner (Discussed changesets: 1) | So... ich nochmal... Ich Danke dir nochmal ausdrücklich für deinen ersten Beitrag zu OSM! Wie ich schon angerissen hatte, hast du offensichtlich ein Thema beschritten, was wir hier bei OSM bisher nicht auf dem Schirm hatten. Den zeitnahen F... commented 2025-11-20 21:28:36 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,100 |
| 174747921 (Comments: 4) | cpa8 (Discussed changesets: 3) | je l'utilise pour surveiller une zone : je vérifie ce que font certains sur ma zone de confort (FeedBro sur FireFox : https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-tiles-feed?bbox= suivi de l'enveloppe qui t'intéresse) commented 2025-11-20 21:22:33 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 174485960 (Comments: 1) | FDOT_Ryan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Is FDot hiring for the position you have? I'd be interested. commented 2025-11-20 21:21:33 UTC by txemt ♦76 |
| 174922274 (Comments: 2) | ks1v (Discussed changesets: 38) | hi! thanks for noticing that bridge: you're right. Changed to simple bridge=yes ponds: both of them are covered with chain link mesh. While it's a service water storages, I think, for irrigation and humidity control, it's... commented 2025-11-20 21:16:06 UTC by ks1v ♦22 |
| 174307831 (Comments: 2) | atticquilt (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the heads up. commented 2025-11-20 21:03:58 UTC by atticquilt ♦8 |
| 174922961 (Comments: 4) | BrownianMotion (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok, we kijken er net iets anders naar. Als het van die gewone verkeershekken waren geweest waren we het eens geweest. Ik kan hier wel mee leven hoor. Ik had niet door dat je de betonblokken er ook al op had gezet overigens, dat is wel nice. Het was o... commented 2025-11-20 21:03:04 UTC by BrownianMotion ♦8 |
| 157242559 (Comments: 2) | XioNoX (Discussed changesets: 20) | et hop https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174924564 commented 2025-11-20 21:02:01 UTC by XioNoX ♦30 |
| 174869734 (Comments: 2) | BrownianMotion (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ha A67, prima. De reden dat ik er highway=service van heb gemaakt is dat dit hele stuk nu in feite alleen de weg is naar de parkeertereinen van het LUMC en Rijnveste. De dunnere weergave van highway=service maakt de situatie ook wat makkelijker te zi... commented 2025-11-20 20:44:36 UTC by BrownianMotion ♦8 |
| 174563828 (Comments: 1) | Janek_Markert (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-11-20 20:44:26 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174896763 (Comments: 1) | Eric-1980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bitte beachten Sie die Kommentarregeln der OSM-Community für Änderungssets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-11-20 20:42:53 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174874747 (Comments: 1) | bba367ghd (Discussed changesets: 5) | Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-20 20:41:49 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174922486 (Comments: 1) | Carpathians (Discussed changesets: 29) | Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-20 20:40:55 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174923416 (Comments: 2) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | TX-36 is that a street??? Have you any idea what this company does? Have you checked verified? commented 2025-11-20 20:35:39 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174734788 (Comments: 1) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 111) | Po raz kolejny proszę - stosuj się do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-20 20:34:03 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦668 |
| 174742410 (Comments: 2) | brassica (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ah ok, bedankt voor de toelichting. commented 2025-11-20 20:16:35 UTC by brassica ♦18 |
| 174917433 (Comments: 1) | AmongusMan69420 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I recently surveyed this street after your initial change and confirmed that normal traffic cannot enter this street both ways, as to why I tagged it as oneway=yes. I am going to change it back, however if you have further reasoning for your change i... commented 2025-11-20 20:15:54 UTC by Muzz17 ♦2 |
| 135939169 (Comments: 1) | Avigayil Simpson (Discussed changesets: 1) | שלום אביגיל האם יש כאן ברז? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10883912176/history זה ברז נוסף על הברז שכבר היה מסומן מעט דרומה? commented 2025-11-20 20:14:50 UTC by hatul ♦420 |
| 174886614 (Comments: 3) | catsparrow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! commented 2025-11-20 20:14:49 UTC by ion_chi ♦42 |
| 174922489 (Comments: 1) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | A transport company with a beauty shop tag in a residential area? Really???? commented 2025-11-20 20:02:19 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174576614 (Comments: 6) | BenutzerXYXY (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ich habe mich nun für place=locality entschieden und die Mertener Höhe und die Eitorfer Schweiz entsprechend eingetragen (jeweils ein Node etwa in der Flächenmitte). Scheuren ist ersatzlos gelöscht. Den Nutscheid habe ich als natu... commented 2025-11-20 20:01:03 UTC by BenutzerXYXY ♦6 |
| 174922085 (Comments: 1) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | Again no caps! commented 2025-11-20 19:54:18 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174910894 (Comments: 2) | velomalopolska (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tak, jest tak jak piszesz. Poprawiłem żeby to pokazać. Relacja został rozcięta budową mostu (jest wysoki nasyp teraz), czekamy na wybudowanie łącznika pod mostem. Jest wyznakowany tymczasowy objazd. commented 2025-11-20 19:37:01 UTC by velomalopolska ♦1 |
| 173496751 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hallo Metzor, sorry, wenn ich erst jetzt mich bei dir melde!! Danke, das du die paar Sachen in den Parkhaus eingefügt hast!! Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Donnerstag Abend noch!! Mit Freundlichen Grü&sz... commented 2025-11-20 19:35:39 UTC by Fabian007 ♦54 |
| 174715626 (Comments: 1) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 8) | According to https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1447198752648207, there is no filter road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451023071. And you are leaving vague changeset comments as well. commented 2025-11-20 19:34:13 UTC by ika-chan! ♦304 |
| 173495112 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hallo mcliquid, Sorry, das ich erst jetzt melde, aber ich weiß leider nicht, ob bwegt zu Transdev gehöhrt, oder eher nicht. Kannst du mir dabei helfen, bitte? Danke, und einen schönen Sonntag Abend, wünsche i... commented 2025-11-20 19:29:35 UTC by Fabian007 ♦54 |
| 162268157 (Comments: 9) | End0fLine (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ah! To the best of my knowledge, carto renders all sport pitches as the same shade of green even if you set a color on it. I ran into a cool blue field in Texas one day and thought it would look cool on the map, but it was still green... commented 2025-11-20 19:23:48 UTC by End0fLine ♦21 |
| 151158977 (Comments: 2) | Danfost (Discussed changesets: 45) | hat sich erledigt, ich habs gefunden und eingetragen. commented 2025-11-20 19:17:12 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,432 |
| 174664031 (Comments: 2) | VLD322 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I really appreciate your confirmation. Thank you for the comment and hope you have a fantastic day! commented 2025-11-20 19:12:34 UTC by VLD322 ♦3 |
| 174913962 (Comments: 1) | Bearman Creative (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Bearman Creative, Croeso i OSM! I just want to point a couple of things out to you Buildings, when possible, should be squared - you can do this by clicking the building and pressing Q on your keyboard. Also, house names shoul... commented 2025-11-20 19:05:32 UTC by ceirios ♦69 |
| 174878466 (Comments: 2) | avtoneevaa (Discussed changesets: 6) | еще и тег здания снесли. это вандализм commented 2025-11-20 19:05:23 UTC by literan ♦6,878 |
| 174805395 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hallo mcliquid, Oh sorry, Tippfehler von mir gewsen!! Wie kann ich das in der App rückgängig machen, oder kannst du es bitte damit machen, bitte?? Danke, und einen schönen Donnerstag Abend, wünsche ich dir noc... commented 2025-11-20 19:03:48 UTC by Fabian007 ♦54 |
| 174920433 (Comments: 1) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 5) | No idea why this is so big lol 😭 commented 2025-11-20 18:59:01 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦2 |
| 160238099 (Comments: 9) | emarv (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zmieniłem relację i napisałem do PTTK aby usunęli szlak z geoportalu. Tag abandoned tu nie pasuje, bo szlak został skasowany celowo, o czym świadczą znaki zamalowane celowo. commented 2025-11-20 18:49:43 UTC by VA00 ♦616 |
| 174911530 (Comments: 1) | flopong (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, zu deinen Bearbeitungen habe ich folgende Anmerkungen: - Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken &ndas... commented 2025-11-20 18:46:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174823318 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26ST (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names. The tags are sufficient --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823318 commented 2025-11-20 18:30:59 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823203 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26ST (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don't add personal information to the OSM database. It has been removed --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823203 commented 2025-11-20 18:30:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823742 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26AE (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: to create a round object, just select the object and type a "c" - this has been fixed --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823742 commented 2025-11-20 18:27:24 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823900 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26OMS (Discussed changesets: 3) | #TIP: square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - Also, please follow the roof outline. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823900 ... commented 2025-11-20 18:23:19 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823512 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26OMS (Discussed changesets: 3) | I've reverted this edit since the building you added does not exist. Please only add building outlines by following the roof line --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823512 |
| 174915453 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 68) | Please don't draw a new line when there's no physical separation. This should use `bus:lanes=` commented 2025-11-20 18:19:58 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,658 |
| 174823128 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26OMS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't add personal information. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823128 commented 2025-11-20 18:19:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174823111 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26AJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't add any personal information, including in the changeset comment. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174823111 commented 2025-11-20 18:16:05 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 173883689 (Comments: 2) | Gums (Discussed changesets: 6) | So, ich habe den Änderungssatz wieder reverted. Bei den POIs auf dem Parkplatz musste selbst schauen, was da korrekt wäre. Bitte dabei die Straßen nicht einfach kaputt hauen und die Buslinien am besten gar nicht anfassen commented 2025-11-20 18:08:36 UTC by hybridOL ♦32 |
| 174521377 (Comments: 2) | qoro (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you, I will merge commented 2025-11-20 17:51:40 UTC by qoro ♦4 |
| 174912531 (Comments: 2) | qoro (Discussed changesets: 8) | Must've been a mistake on my part commented 2025-11-20 17:50:52 UTC by qoro ♦4 |
| 167713207 (Comments: 3) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 219) | Poprawiłem, dzięki commented 2025-11-20 17:50:45 UTC by kubahahaha ♦409 |
| 174916782 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26HL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.... commented 2025-11-20 17:48:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174916057 (Comments: 1) | Fly Dreams (Discussed changesets: 3) | this is in the middle of the road, please check its actual position and fix the position, for context I have attached a screenshot below: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/refs/heads/main/other/Screenshot%202025-11-... commented 2025-11-20 17:40:42 UTC by Udarian ♦528 |
| 174915856 (Comments: 1) | Fly Dreams (Discussed changesets: 3) | this adds a duplicate node commented 2025-11-20 17:37:01 UTC by Udarian ♦528 |
| 174916170 (Comments: 1) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 41) | zapomniałem dodać Premium do tytułu commented 2025-11-20 17:16:18 UTC by RafaBoski ♦15 |
| 170069887 (Comments: 1) | DKeaton (Discussed changesets: 1) | The museum already existed on OSM as a building a few yards south. Do you want to move your tags? commented 2025-11-20 17:05:18 UTC by heretofore ♦29 |
| 174885079 (Comments: 2) | brassica (Discussed changesets: 19) | Een adresregel voor Landgoed Aw leek me zinvol omdat het bedrijf het vermeldt. Bestaat er een label voor landgoed? Of wellicht met het label admin_level of addr:subdistrict? Het reddit topic gaat over een gebied met woningen zie ik nu, niet... commented 2025-11-20 16:56:26 UTC by brassica ♦18 |
| 174705720 (Comments: 1) | Moschettone (Discussed changesets: 4) | ciao, la convenzione per l'inserimento dei nomi è quella di usare per la prima parola l'iniziale maiuscola, e la minuscola per le altre. anche sulla fonte da te riportata è indicato come <Via delle città Et... commented 2025-11-20 16:56:25 UTC by Andrea Del Sarto ♦78 |
| 174911179 (Comments: 2) | Urban Solution (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dodatkowo opis zmiany nie może być kropką - nic to nie mówi pod kątem oceny zmian, jedynie zwróciło na siebie negatywną uwagę. commented 2025-11-20 16:50:50 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
| 174889850 (Comments: 1) | Yakobi (Discussed changesets: 26) | Не забывайте слово ქუჩა в названии улиц commented 2025-11-20 16:45:42 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦215 |
| 174912077 (Comments: 1) | Mrtomo21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Are you sure that the car rental office is placed exatly in the middle of road, not aside? commented 2025-11-20 16:32:17 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦215 |
| 2736437 (Comments: 6) | Netzwolf (Discussed changesets: 25) | habe die Namensspezialitäten als notes und old_name ergänzt commented 2025-11-20 16:25:16 UTC by kuhni74 ♦400 |
| 174380439 (Comments: 4) | Obi-Wan Kenobier (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dann sind wohl bei den Bauarbeiten für die Windräder einige Stellen zerstört worden. commented 2025-11-20 16:21:19 UTC by GerdP ♦2,789 |
| 174886951 (Comments: 3) | Ian Gerardo Martínez Vargas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for fixing, El ArquiPachuca commented 2025-11-20 16:16:25 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174910658 (Comments: 1) | geoTD (Discussed changesets: 15) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Dear geoTD, you keep submitting the same (false) information over and over. I wrote to you several times. Sint-Lukas is already properly mapped as a university site. There is no need to make it appear like ... commented 2025-11-20 15:59:06 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 174906700 (Comments: 1) | Norman Siehl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Norman, du hast hier um "review_requested" gebeten... Sieht doch gut aus! Ich freue mich! Eine kleine Bitte zum Rundwanderweg... Schau dir mal Klein Köris an, und zwar hier: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16.0/52.169... commented 2025-11-20 15:58:33 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,100 |
 | 164377700 (Comments: 1) | Aianov (Discussed changesets: 16) | According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Dhabi_Plaza, the highest point of this building is just 310, not 382m... commented 2025-11-20 15:43:13 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174809629 (Comments: 3) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 23) | Tout s'explique ! J'avais effectivement vu les nouvelles images de la note puis été averti par mon suivi RSS de la zone que tu avais fait la modif (d'où le mic-mac). La modification suivante attendra, pas de sou... commented 2025-11-20 15:18:34 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 171354532 (Comments: 5) | the Sandinator (Discussed changesets: 7) | C'est quasiment impossible avec iD en l'état, sauf avec beaucoup d'expérience quand on fait la modification. La seule solution est de vérifier qq minutes après l'édition avec un outil assurance q... commented 2025-11-20 15:13:11 UTC by StC ♦372 |
| 173674205 (Comments: 1) | rrrub (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt rrrub, maar dat is geen ziekenhuis. Ik heb het nu aangepast naar een correctere beschrijving: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452355846 commented 2025-11-20 14:41:58 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174902173 (Comments: 1) | dima_lipay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 36 potential crossin... commented 2025-11-20 14:41:56 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 171374663 (Comments: 3) | Lumor2020 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, das Problem ist, dass die Namen nicht immer geläufig sind. Sie sind oft sogar schlichtweg falsch. Unterhalten Sie sich dazu einfach mal mit dem Archiv Freimann. Um ein paar Beispiele zu nennen: 1) Der größte Teil von dem... commented 2025-11-20 14:38:36 UTC by Lumor2020 ♦3 |
 | 174886384 (Comments: 1) | Shannon Neusch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Th... commented 2025-11-20 14:37:14 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦99 |
| 172004594 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 231) | Je kan dan best ook healthcare op was:healthcare zetten. Ik pas het even aan. commented 2025-11-20 14:29:19 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174829461 (Comments: 1) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 258) | Hello, please see: https://mapgen-fi-1.comaps.app/subway/validator/spain.html This caused an error commented 2025-11-20 14:22:48 UTC by pantufla ♦286 |
| 173343427 (Comments: 1) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 258) | Hello, please see: https://mapgen-fi-1.comaps.app/subway/validator/spain.html This caused an error commented 2025-11-20 14:22:36 UTC by pantufla ♦286 |
| 174010677 (Comments: 1) | ArneC (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hier heb ik alle details van het gebouw verwijderd. We mappen zo weinig mogelijk dubbele info; hier is de naam en het adres al van toepassing op de outline van de site commented 2025-11-20 14:22:20 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174028719 (Comments: 1) | ArneC (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zelfde opmerking ivm dubbele ziekenhuizen. Ik heb de naam aangepast naar AZ Oostende - Damiaan, zo staat het ook op hun website: https://www.azoostende.be/naar-az-oostende/naar-de-ziekenhuizen commented 2025-11-20 14:20:53 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174898271 (Comments: 1) | Isabel Morris (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding this. For data consumers to understand what this is, including map renderers, you will need to add some other tags. From your changeset comment, I would guess that... commented 2025-11-20 14:20:44 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,658 |
| 174028303 (Comments: 1) | ArneC (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je hebt hier een dubbel gemaakt, dit ziekenhuis was (uiteraard) al gemapped. Je kan dit bewerken door op de outline van de site te klikken. Ik heb het voor je aangepast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87660373 commented 2025-11-20 14:18:55 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 94156904 (Comments: 1) | Qwave (Discussed changesets: 64) | Sicher dass dieses Gebiet "Bodensee" heißt? commented 2025-11-20 14:16:57 UTC by Pascal1909 ♦9 |
| 173527003 (Comments: 1) | Sebas3 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Waarom heb je deze niet met replace geometry gedaan? Dan behoud je de geschiedenis. Je bent hier ook shop=mall verloren, volgens mij onterecht - er zijn meerdere winkels die je zonder naar buiten te gaan kunt bereiken. commented 2025-11-20 14:14:38 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 173193901 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 231) | niet direct terug erbij commented 2025-11-20 14:13:52 UTC by Jakka ♦1,828 |
| 174521120 (Comments: 3) | Libre à Quimperlé (Discussed changesets: 9) | C'est bien ça. commented 2025-11-20 14:11:15 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 174904872 (Comments: 1) | VRU_JeroenS (Discussed changesets: 9) | Jeroen, Hier heb ik je oprit losgemaakt van de residential van de gemeente.. Groet, eggie commented 2025-11-20 13:56:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174907345 (Comments: 1) | ejderuby (Discussed changesets: 2) | Forgot to add source: https://athenabitcoin.com/atm-locations/?search=Indianapolis%2C+IN%2C+USA commented 2025-11-20 13:48:25 UTC by ejderuby ♦2 |
| 173958157 (Comments: 4) | Marek_P (Discussed changesets: 25) | 1 i 2. Z kolei oznaczanie każdego drzewa rodzi ten problem, że trzeba każdego z nich pilnować z osobna. I tak źle i tak niedobrze. 4. Wypisz wymaluj wpis z wiki vilage_green z sekcji "niewłaściwe użycie" ;) commented 2025-11-20 13:46:11 UTC by Marek_P ♦22 |
| 174759013 (Comments: 4) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 123) | Ich habe jetzt noch den Cutline-Way mit dem Track zusammengeführt. Nach deiner Änderung lagen da tatsächlich immer noch zwei Ways direkt übereinander. Viele Grüße rik commented 2025-11-20 13:35:29 UTC by rik_ ♦91 |
| 135138042 (Comments: 1) | AlojzT (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, du hast in diesem CS den "St. Rupert Pilgerweg" hinzugefügt. Da es nun einen Weg im Gebiet der Gemeinde "Nußdorf am Haunsberg" nicht mehr gibt https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4329029 , habe ich bei der dortige... commented 2025-11-20 13:35:25 UTC by PPete2 ♦134 |
| 174869700 (Comments: 1) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 170) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977348726 Raczej w drugą stronę :P To wygląda prędzej na trafo niż na skrzynkę. commented 2025-11-20 13:31:41 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,178 |
| 174889941 (Comments: 2) | july7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 이 노드는 "독도리"라는 마을 노드였는데 훼손되고 잘못 복구되는 과정을 통해 "독도"처럼 보이게 변한 것입니다. 훼손을 복구하시겠다는 의도는 잘 알겠으나 정확한 히스토... commented 2025-11-20 13:30:50 UTC by ChangwooRyu ♦15 |
| 167417689 (Comments: 1) | Vétérini (Discussed changesets: 4) | Salut, C'est JOSM qui vire les old_name ? commented 2025-11-20 13:29:05 UTC by LudovicG ♦95 |
| 172914669 (Comments: 2) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 32) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/drogi-w-budowie/94470/128 commented 2025-11-20 13:18:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 174883214 (Comments: 2) | Lalon Swaney (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the three nodes https://www.osm.org/node/9323176249, https://www.osm.org/node/9583868797, https://www.osm.org/node/9602008499 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the nodes back... commented 2025-11-20 13:16:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174765625 (Comments: 1) | Paul-François (Discussed changesets: 3) | Salut, ça sent la souris qui a dérapé et le point qui est allé se coller à la voirie : https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=174765625#map=20/47.7478280/-3.3685213 commented 2025-11-20 13:15:08 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 168051086 (Comments: 4) | ainhoah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Attention ! Il est interdit d’utiliser Google Streetview pour la contribution à OpenStreetMap, en raison de leurs conditions d’utilisation. Consultez la documentation ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Google. commented 2025-11-20 13:11:59 UTC by Ltrlg ♦89 |
| 174883537 (Comments: 1) | MatthewSP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/671140183, https://www.osm.org/way/671140306. What is the mean of the key FID? commented 2025-11-20 13:08:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174884388 (Comments: 1) | eagomez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/357086620. Is this the same church? If this is the case, combine the two pieces of information. If you need help, please get in touch. commented 2025-11-20 13:06:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174900793 (Comments: 1) | ainhoah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sur quels critères vous basez-vous pour cette modification ? D’une part, `highway=unclassified` est plutôt utilisé sur des voies hors agglomération, ce qui n’est pas le cas ici (même si j’ad... commented 2025-11-20 13:05:32 UTC by Ltrlg ♦89 |
| 174899625 (Comments: 1) | Brady rowsley cfa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you have added two defibrillators here. Was this intended or should a duplicate be deleted? commented 2025-11-20 13:04:03 UTC by nevw ♦2,074 |
| 174820422 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 441) | Un camping qui se dit 4 étoiles sans toilettes est-il un camping ? Je suppose qu'ils veulent dire que les sanitaires sont réservés aux clients (ce qui est classique), pas que les clients doivent uriner dans la piscine pour s... commented 2025-11-20 13:03:56 UTC by trial ♦977 |
 | 174861635 (Comments: 1) | Angela Edmonds (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. Please read the instructions how to map settlements and hedges. You mapped buildings and called them place=isolated area. Just use 1 node and add the place=... tag. About hedges: The instructions ask ... commented 2025-11-20 12:41:02 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 173873299 (Comments: 4) | Mikenjinoda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ja ich hatte mal damit angefangen, da ich sowieso dort was bearbeitet hatte, darum die Insel :-) Kannst es gerne zurücksetzen, danke. Grüsse commented 2025-11-20 12:39:57 UTC by Mikenjinoda ♦2 |
| 174903378 (Comments: 1) | MissKessa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, revierto este changeset, puedes indicar de que ejercicio se trata? elementos como parque que no los son y tags como ip=null? commented 2025-11-20 12:36:58 UTC by aTarom ♦841 |
| 174258087 (Comments: 1) | CharlotFR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour la cartographie du parking. J'ai une question : - Tu as fais comment pour cartographier le parking ? BD Ortho IGN (qui est la source mentionné n'est pas à jour. Je n'ai pas trou... commented 2025-11-20 12:27:07 UTC by Cayenne17 ♦20 |
| 153413360 (Comments: 1) | inked_dekin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao inked_dekin According to https://untune.art/about/ and https://www.facebook.com/untuneall this artist seems to reside in Spain. I also don't fully understand your changeset comment, can you elaborate on this a bit? Greetings, h... commented 2025-11-20 12:16:42 UTC by habi ♦1,969 |
| 174900938 (Comments: 4) | VRU_JeroenS (Discussed changesets: 9) | Die zag ik ook en heb ik inmiddels aangepast commented 2025-11-20 12:13:53 UTC by VRU_JeroenS ♦4 |
| 164133264 (Comments: 1) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 199) | Bez żartów. Gruntowy track i grade1 to wzajemnie wykluczające się tagi. Po dzisiejszej jeździe, to ja bardziej do grade3 bym się skłaniał.... commented 2025-11-20 12:11:23 UTC by VA00 ♦616 |
| 160123272 (Comments: 1) | GetoX (Discussed changesets: 2) | To raczej jakiś podjazd mógłby ewentualnie być. Pytanie na ile zasadne jest w ogóle trzymanie tego typu detali drogi zaproponowanej ponad 10 lat temu. I tak docelowo będzie to inaczej wyglądało. Jedna kreska wystarczy. commented 2025-11-20 12:08:00 UTC by VA00 ♦616 |
| 174033331 (Comments: 1) | thapa prativa (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. When you map highways that cross a hedge, please leave a gap in that hedge, Best regards commented 2025-11-20 12:01:21 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174899098 (Comments: 1) | LjubanK (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bad edit, not residential commented 2025-11-20 11:34:38 UTC by AdrianLangtry ♦17 |
| 174893350 (Comments: 1) | Wonderful Alligator (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag Wonderful Alligator, Het beste kun je het bedrijf taggen op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. Wellicht heeft het bedrijf ook een naam? MVG eggie commented 2025-11-20 11:31:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174901628 (Comments: 1) | Vest-Agder-museet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 9 potential crossing... commented 2025-11-20 11:28:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174898758 (Comments: 2) | Serviceteam daarom (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174898758 Ik heb de weg teruggelegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-20 11:22:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174899360 (Comments: 1) | André de Meijer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-20 11:13:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 162163189 (Comments: 3) | zxwzxwzxw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, gracias por el comentario. Lo tendré en cuenta. saludos y gracias commented 2025-11-20 11:12:39 UTC by zxwzxwzxw ♦2 |
| 174899102 (Comments: 1) | Grasmaa1er (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dag Grasmaa1er, foot=yes is default, maar toevoegen kan prima. Waarom zou hier oneway=yes staan en op sommige stukken layer=-1 MVG eggie commented 2025-11-20 11:05:10 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174595004 (Comments: 3) | 盖子哥 (Discussed changesets: 6) | 是的，自治州不用渲染，因为它不像县有县城，而只有“州政府驻地”，纯粹是一个跟“青海省”一样的区域型地名 commented 2025-11-20 11:00:06 UTC by Rukkhadevata ♦35 |
| 157426945 (Comments: 8) | jengelh (Discussed changesets: 142) | Ah ok, hab ich gerade gesehen. Ich glaube, dass der braune Farn-Streifen noch etwas schmaler ist, aber passt schon ungefähr, denke ich. commented 2025-11-20 10:47:53 UTC by hqs-plus ♦29 |
| 162043814 (Comments: 1) | Visit Zielona Góra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wszelkie tabliczki można też podejrzeć tutaj: https://openpoimap.org/?map=tourism&zoom=16&lat=51.94001&lon=15.51059&layers=B00FFFFFFFFTFFFFFFFFFFFF Ja przypisałem dodatkowo linki do Visit Zielona Góra a to ze względu na... commented 2025-11-20 10:09:15 UTC by km2bp ♦288 |
| 174877007 (Comments: 2) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 19) | Feel free to look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234001304 when you miss it 😅 commented 2025-11-20 10:07:38 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦29 |
| 174863547 (Comments: 1) | divine_123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Maybe you put some comments on your edit. d means nothing... commented 2025-11-20 10:00:40 UTC by rarad74 ♦316 |
| 174865692 (Comments: 3) | Gianluca lama (Discussed changesets: 3) | Se volete creare una mappa personalizzata, va utilizzato uMap: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/ Se volete importare dei vostri dati nel database di OSM, vanno seguite le linee guida per gli import: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Impor... commented 2025-11-20 10:00:38 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,797 |
| 174865478 (Comments: 1) | Gianluca lama (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Gianluca, anche in questo caso avevi creato un edificio sovrapposto. Inoltre avevi aggiunto il nome del cimitero all'edificio, non all'intero cimitero. Ho corretto. commented 2025-11-20 09:47:57 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,797 |
| 174898061 (Comments: 2) | ivanbranco (Discussed changesets: 127) | Ovviamente volevo commentare il changeset revertato c: commented 2025-11-20 09:44:53 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,797 |
| 129823976 (Comments: 1) | Haus der Nachhaltigkeit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, bei diesem Baum fehlte das natural=tree. Da noch mehr Bäume laut des CS-Kommentars gepflanzt wurden, können diese gern eingezeichnet werden. Gruß L. commented 2025-11-20 09:41:32 UTC by Lokai ♦483 |
| 174884527 (Comments: 1) | RRuffneck (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Je vraagt feedback.. Op 4 nov was er nog niets te zien daar. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.26963,4.833416,18/?datastrip=20251104_PNEO-03 Wellicht construction? MVG eggie commented 2025-11-20 09:21:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 165655815 (Comments: 1) | LordMadsen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi LordMadsen, the building polygon already contains the address. Is there a particular reason to duplicate the address? The same applies to house number 1B (Hessenwinkler Straße) commented 2025-11-20 09:21:08 UTC by walkman_ua ♦1 |
| 174844826 (Comments: 2) | ankinator (Discussed changesets: 1) | Masz rację, robiłem to na aplikacji w telefonie więc trochę niedokładnie zaznaczyłem commented 2025-11-20 09:16:17 UTC by ankinator ♦1 |
| 174895614 (Comments: 1) | tmk787 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Dag tml.. Je vraagt feedback. Meestal zullen die brugdoorsteken ook voor fietsers zijn. Dan zal het niet een wandelpad (footway) zijn met een G7 bord als je er mag fietsen. Ik maak er nu even een highway=path van .. Verder routeren zal het ... commented 2025-11-20 09:07:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174894118 (Comments: 1) | Chiel van de Logt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, Je vraagt feedback... Wanneer het verboden Toegang is dan is access=no voldoende. Je hoeft dan niet al andere categorieën te noemen. Routeren zal het overigens niet. Het is alleen maar cosmetisch op de kaart. Ook voor dat bouwverk... commented 2025-11-20 08:57:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 173869821 (Comments: 2) | db-ak (Discussed changesets: 41) | Taki mam powolny plan, chciałbym wykorzystać te ścieżki pod nawigację bo w wielu miejscach będą fajne skróty. Zacząłem od swojej okolicy i planuje robić dalsze dzielnice lub parki commented 2025-11-20 08:51:33 UTC by db-ak ♦50 |
| 171741279 (Comments: 1) | tim_web (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Tim, wenn du die Adresse ohnehin schon aktualisierst, wäre es super, den POI direkt an die richtige Stelle mitzuziehen. Ich habe ihn jetzt bereits nach Köln verschoben – sonst landet man schnell mal im rund 200 km entfernten B... commented 2025-11-20 08:49:12 UTC by AndySchulte ♦103 |
| 104503629 (Comments: 2) | itasterix (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ciao, il dato arriva dai miei occhi che vedono i cartelli che indicano i sentieri, visto che giro spesso in zona. commented 2025-11-20 08:48:56 UTC by itasterix ♦10 |
| 174884003 (Comments: 1) | VlIvYur (Discussed changesets: 57) | Thanks! commented 2025-11-20 08:40:29 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
| 174883377 (Comments: 1) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 44) | Zapomniałeś o podaniu źródła informacji. commented 2025-11-20 08:40:03 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
| 174892276 (Comments: 2) | Marcus Fihlon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für den Hinweis, @Lezurex, habe ich gemacht. commented 2025-11-20 08:39:04 UTC by Marcus Fihlon ♦4 |
| 174770639 (Comments: 2) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 123) | Hi João, the errors here were the same as in changeset 174770653. I have reverted this one here as well so you can fix it yourself. Kind regards Guido commented 2025-11-20 08:02:13 UTC by gscholz ♦2,797 |
| 174857178 (Comments: 4) | NBB-MA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vermutlich sollten alle anderen Änderungen des User ebenfalls noch einmal angeschaut werden. Es sieht irgendwie schon sehr nach reinem löschen aus ... commented 2025-11-20 07:56:11 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174861030 (Comments: 2) | Chiel van de Logt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Goedemorgen Eggie, Bedankt voor je bericht. Er is inderdaad een doorsteek bij de Margaretha van Mechelenweg. Deze zal ik nog even toevoegen. Gr. Chiel commented 2025-11-20 07:48:15 UTC by Chiel van de Logt ♦2 |
| 174859158 (Comments: 1) | thapa prativa (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Your new highway Way: 1451965744 duplicates an existing highway. Thus I've removed it. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-11-20 07:29:15 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 174892272 (Comments: 1) | Alcabohni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das Format der Öffnungszeiten sollten jetzt passen. commented 2025-11-20 07:22:21 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦14 |
| 174892763 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 14) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174891657 commented 2025-11-20 07:20:50 UTC by pwbriggs ♦96 |
| 174891657 (Comments: 2) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 14) | Metro's route page: https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/routes-and-service/schedules-and-maps/075#route-map commented 2025-11-20 07:20:13 UTC by pwbriggs ♦96 |
| 174878307 (Comments: 1) | germanlion67osm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, bei einem Parkplatz mit eigener Zufahrt wird street_side als Wert für parking nicht verwendet, sondern surface. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side#Wann_parking=street_side_nicht_verwenden? Gruß... commented 2025-11-20 07:17:16 UTC by tux67 ♦1,996 |
| 174527189 (Comments: 1) | Emil1887 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo Emil1887, ich habe noch construction=residential ergänzt, damit die Info nicht verloren geht, welcher highway Typ es ist. Das sollte bei highway Baustellen immer angegeben werden :) Viele Grüße Henri commented 2025-11-20 07:12:38 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦33 |
| 174876426 (Comments: 1) | memag6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions. I noticed that in this changeset you updated several Ukrainian street names to the “вулиця …” format, which can be correct if it reflects current street signage or ... commented 2025-11-20 06:58:55 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174892343 (Comments: 2) | Kaleb Fordyce (Discussed changesets: 1) | I meant it doesn't sit at this location anymore, but you get the gist. It was removed from this location about a year ago. commented 2025-11-20 06:52:59 UTC by Kaleb Fordyce ♦1 |
| 174844128 (Comments: 1) | MHrouhnavaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | اولین شهر مسکونی با امکانات هتل های لوکس commented 2025-11-20 06:46:59 UTC by MHrouhnavaz ♦1 |
| 174892176 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 14) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174891657 for U District-bound edit, and more context. commented 2025-11-20 06:44:12 UTC by pwbriggs ♦96 |
| 174881002 (Comments: 1) | fyp483694 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 8 potential crossing... commented 2025-11-20 06:36:14 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174879317 (Comments: 1) | Elaszzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 8 potential crossing... commented 2025-11-20 06:36:04 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174176821 (Comments: 2) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 11) | Je suis particulièrement attentif aux stations Vélo Plus :P Après c'est aussi une question de chance de passer au bon moment :) commented 2025-11-20 06:16:29 UTC by BardafFr ♦12 |
| 174890693 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 164) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18981 commented 2025-11-20 06:14:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174886728 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 135) | Reverted incorrect reversion. This changeset accidentally restored the vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174891266 commented 2025-11-20 06:05:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174861162 (Comments: 1) | Harshavardhan2000A (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Harshavardhan2000A, As can be seen from this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579278975/history, you are vandalising proper villages. If you are mapping landuse, just create a separate polygon and tag it with landuse=residential. You n... commented 2025-11-20 05:30:44 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦573 |
| 174640222 (Comments: 4) | Antoxxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Я Брест на карте даже не открывал) редактировал отель в Китае commented 2025-11-20 05:11:51 UTC by Antoxxer ♦1 |
| 174889921 (Comments: 1) | 1538615423865283 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I added the wrong source, it should be https://nj.gov/lps/njsp/division/homeland-security/pdf/TSB/TSB_Map.pdf commented 2025-11-20 05:10:38 UTC by 1538615423865283 ♦3 |
| 174773067 (Comments: 3) | Kuatsystems (Discussed changesets: 31) | It is, a work in progress, and every bit of help makes me a better mapper commented 2025-11-20 04:39:48 UTC by Kuatsystems ♦21 |
| 174889797 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 20) | Forgot to add this in the changeset comment: "I forgot about this when I split the way from its adjoining way after adding the placement tag." Correct changeset comment: "Removed placement tag from newly created way. I for... commented 2025-11-20 04:35:46 UTC by Frank Peng ♦38 |
| 174842383 (Comments: 2) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hello, Udarian! My name is Gaurav, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Based on the most recent Lyft-owned aerial imagery https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TTHTGPXVufve--GTEkkVvMKWxYJvUySo/view?usp=sharing as of 15 may 2025, the remaini... commented 2025-11-20 04:18:03 UTC by grawat_Lyft ♦12 |
| 171107130 (Comments: 2) | Airdel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Espero pronto poder georreferenciar los árboles del Parque de la Dignidad, por si se les ocurre destruir este parque también :( commented 2025-11-20 04:12:07 UTC by Eddie845 ♦12 |
| 174811656 (Comments: 1) | BirchTainer (Discussed changesets: 1) | According to a note on the lake area, it says that it "should follow 4200 ft mean level (butlerm)". I am not sure who made that note or why, but I think this change does not reflect that. commented 2025-11-20 04:11:25 UTC by MadCat3D ♦1 |
| 174888911 (Comments: 1) | CS2100 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Brainfart: should say New Minas commented 2025-11-20 03:36:20 UTC by CS2100 ♦2 |
| 174869974 (Comments: 2) | NeuronAtlas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM! Nice work. Also, it's limits on new accounts, not sure how long it limits last for, but keeping edits manageable is a good practice anyway. If you are getting over 100 edits might be a good time to commit. Sorry for the setbac... commented 2025-11-20 03:18:51 UTC by MassCartog ♦244 |
| 29548952 (Comments: 1) | Alan Bragg (Discussed changesets: 87) | I am new to OSM and I know we aren't supposed to tag for the renderer, but the access=private on the long main trail on the peninsula makes AllTrails and Carto reduce the visibility of the trail and I feel like it might discourage people from us... commented 2025-11-20 02:29:51 UTC by lynx777 ♦3 |
| 174868671 (Comments: 3) | Rockedf (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks, I was looking at that earlier. What license is the square data available under? https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Pending-Places makes it sound like Square is submitting these to you, is that the case? commented 2025-11-20 02:12:06 UTC by citrula ♦969 |
| 174832727 (Comments: 3) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 429) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174886728 commented 2025-11-20 01:14:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174841499 (Comments: 4) | Elk Townsman (Discussed changesets: 4) | No worries, thanks for helping fill a blind spot in the current network of Okies working on OSM. commented 2025-11-20 01:03:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 174875220 (Comments: 2) | Keith Yoder (Discussed changesets: 5) | Gracias por tu comentario. Revertí todos los cambios relacionados con la etiqueta de charge. Estaba buscando precios de peaje para un viaje a Argentina y pensé que podría ser útil tenerlo en el mapa. Pero entiendo que los ... commented 2025-11-20 00:43:39 UTC by Keith Yoder ♦1 |
| 174795558 (Comments: 5) | Another OSM User (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for confirming you didn't use Streetview! When saving a changeset, you can specify how you got the information in the "sources" field. "Local knowledge" would be the one you would want in this case. Specifying your sou... commented 2025-11-20 00:28:03 UTC by impiaaa ♦447 |
| 174828801 (Comments: 1) | Uncle181 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check https://osm.org/note/5060505 commented 2025-11-20 00:21:32 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
| 174814193 (Comments: 1) | fmc_5 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please check https://osm.org/note/5060497 commented 2025-11-20 00:04:25 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
 | 174791530 (Comments: 1) | zzzq56 (Discussed changesets: 2) | كفا تخريبا للخريطة، لاتضع نقاط لانك تريد ان تقول عيد ميلاد سعيد لحبيبتك! commented 2025-11-20 00:03:13 UTC by 𒂼𒄄 ♦42 |
| 174009138 (Comments: 1) | Mohammed Bismallah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18978 commented 2025-11-19 23:49:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 161859942 (Comments: 3) | SFGJimStreet (Discussed changesets: 16) | thanks! commented 2025-11-19 23:30:21 UTC by Joske1020 ♦11 |
| 174669325 (Comments: 2) | Joske1020 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ja, ik dacht dat ik zomaar een deeltje kon veranderen maar daar veranderde het hele bos mee commented 2025-11-19 23:28:56 UTC by Joske1020 ♦11 |
| 174867959 (Comments: 1) | Tynstar (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174883474 commented 2025-11-19 23:18:14 UTC by Bienson ♦362 |
| 174867960 (Comments: 1) | Tynstar (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174883474 commented 2025-11-19 23:18:13 UTC by Bienson ♦362 |
| 174882401 (Comments: 1) | 0235 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Re https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/161072 , I'm not sure what the original issue was. 10 years ago it was like https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2fP3 . Since then https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763513258 as been added. According to local auth... commented 2025-11-19 23:15:17 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,537 |
| 150702713 (Comments: 3) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 55) | J'avais bien compris l'origine de l'erreur, tu es bien le premier^^. Je fais confiance à La Galerie pour savoir quel emplacement a été loué à Yves Rocher. Comme c'est eux qui le disent directe... commented 2025-11-19 22:46:11 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 174722313 (Comments: 3) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 189) | A ze zmian w terenie, zmieniła się organizacja ruchu w rynku, DW863 w końcu ma pierwszeństwo (powinna mieć od początku po otwarciu obwodnicy), a droga, po której wcześniej szła DW865 jest teraz jednokierunkowa commented 2025-11-19 22:43:40 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦798 |
| 174832219 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 429) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-11-19 22:39:12 UTC by bartgron ♦333 |
| 171967482 (Comments: 1) | dragosandreipirghie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I noticed that in your recent edits at BUD (LHBP) you added several aircraft parking positions as ways. However, these positions already existed as nodes, so this resulted in duplication. For example, the R211 stand is now present both as a no... commented 2025-11-19 22:38:18 UTC by balint36 ♦217 |
| 171967840 (Comments: 1) | dragosandreipirghie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I noticed that in your recent edits at BUD (LHBP) you added several aircraft parking positions as ways. However, these positions already existed as nodes, so this resulted in duplication. For example, the R211 stand is now present both as a no... commented 2025-11-19 22:38:14 UTC by balint36 ♦217 |
| 171968094 (Comments: 1) | dragosandreipirghie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I noticed that in your recent edits at BUD airport you added several aircraft parking positions as ways. However, these positions already existed as nodes, so this resulted in duplication. For example, the R211 stand is now present both as a n... commented 2025-11-19 22:38:11 UTC by balint36 ♦217 |
| 174879813 (Comments: 2) | Elk Townsman (Discussed changesets: 4) | thank you commented 2025-11-19 22:35:46 UTC by Elk Townsman ♦3 |
| 174878067 (Comments: 1) | Emiliz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, With respect, the two crossings below do not have any zebra markings. We are speaking of the node where the sidewalk must cross the yellow cycle tracks. We tag those with highway=crossing + crossing:markings=no. https://www.ope... commented 2025-11-19 22:27:10 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 174859601 (Comments: 1) | Orr Ben-Sheffer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, good catch! I also fixed the parts west of Bell. commented 2025-11-19 22:18:08 UTC by citrula ♦969 |
| 174324304 (Comments: 1) | RemiParmentelat (Discussed changesets: 6) | Pour bien faire il faut aussi connecter le ruisseau, pas seulement le faire arriver dans la surface. commented 2025-11-19 22:05:25 UTC by LouisXIV ♦35 |
| 174762417 (Comments: 2) | mikaelleberre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci pour votre réponse. Je vais tenter de supprimer les numéros et passer par pifometre si cela est la bonne technique commented 2025-11-19 22:02:49 UTC by mikaelleberre ♦1 |
| 174826864 (Comments: 1) | DawidiDawidi (Discussed changesets: 1) | przeciez ludzie chodzą... commented 2025-11-19 21:59:37 UTC by Yog Sot ♦358 |
| 174507891 (Comments: 1) | yanaaaa (Discussed changesets: 9) | Навіщо було видаляти тег будівлі? Правку скасовую commented 2025-11-19 21:55:13 UTC by mike140 ♦354 |
| 168213096 (Comments: 1) | Alyssa Yuli Jung (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, why did you add duplicate buildings to the map? That was completely pointless. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168213096 commented 2025-11-19 21:33:34 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦134 |
| 174872105 (Comments: 1) | zbyszekg9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-11-19 21:32:25 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 174858599 (Comments: 1) | Vratislaviensis (Discussed changesets: 11) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-11-19 21:32:19 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 136249039 (Comments: 1) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 32) | Please do not add addr:* tags to municipal boundary relations. It has no added value nor use case. commented 2025-11-19 21:30:51 UTC by kabelhaai ♦61 |
| 174515494 (Comments: 3) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 5) | OK, I've changed that back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174879700 . The previous conversation was in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174120016 - the author of that is the person to talk to about where it really goes! commented 2025-11-19 21:18:46 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,537 |
| 174879347 (Comments: 1) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 82) | Imagery used: ESRI World Imagery Imagery was aligned to new GPX tracks (uploaded) commented 2025-11-19 21:08:00 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 174737480 (Comments: 2) | ernestoandolfi (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ciao Nick. Ci metto tutta la mia attenzione e controllo sempre che Josm non dia avvertimenti di cose da correggere. Inserendo solo corsi d'acqua lavoro solo su quelli mettendo sempre il layer -1 sotto le strade. Nella quantità potrebbe sc... commented 2025-11-19 21:01:22 UTC by ernestoandolfi ♦22 |
 | 174242524 (Comments: 1) | Mateen Bhatti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Mateen Bhatti, I have a few questions regarding made to the intersection at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447715386 . I see some overpass and tunnels added here including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447715386 , https... commented 2025-11-19 20:50:32 UTC by Lauxsin ♦7 |
| 174877263 (Comments: 1) | Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tip... format phone begint in osm met +31 Gr eggie commented 2025-11-19 20:48:39 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174797785 (Comments: 1) | fayor (Discussed changesets: 115) | 1. Perché hai eliminato gli elementi disused:shop=* e deisused:amenity=* e shop=vacant ? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7042592734 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7044823711 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936944559 , https://... commented 2025-11-19 20:46:01 UTC by Danysan95 ♦122 |
 | 65154650 (Comments: 1) | André mpongo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Sir. What seems to be a forest is marked as orchard. Is it possible it is mislabeled and should be forest? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=forest Thank you. commented 2025-11-19 20:44:23 UTC by martin-kokos ♦40 |
| 174863156 (Comments: 1) | sandraurbano (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Sandra, Gracias por mejorar OSM, pero en este caso has modificado una reserva natural y la has etiquetado como si fuera un parque recreativo (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park). Como ves en la wiki, los parques d... commented 2025-11-19 20:28:13 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,702 |
| 174849592 (Comments: 2) | Nellywood (Discussed changesets: 2) | также, я уже просил, не превращать улицы в служебные проезды commented 2025-11-19 20:17:04 UTC by literan ♦6,878 |
| X | 174833334 (Comments: 6) | cvseibert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Well, there are 860 grave sites showing in Find A Grave and I am an editor at Miles Files https://espl-genealogy.org/index.php My project there is to get Miles Files, Find A Grave, & OpenStreetMap to all agree with the 2 graveyard books for A... commented 2025-11-19 20:12:17 UTC by cvseibert ♦1 |
 | 174566768 (Comments: 3) | viksu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moi, Kumosin nämä (ja muutkin alueelle tekemäsi) muutokset virheellisinä. Kuitenkin jos osm:n muokkaus kiinnostaa, niin alla on jotain lueskeltavaa oikein kartoittamisesta. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ https://... commented 2025-11-19 20:06:55 UTC by Sakari_N ♦95 |
| 174874906 (Comments: 1) | Siepdouven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De tag area=yes hoort niet op landuse=industrial Ik pas het weer even aan. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM C... commented 2025-11-19 20:04:40 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174869981 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks! commented 2025-11-19 20:03:43 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,537 |
| 174867130 (Comments: 1) | Kaleb_M (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please don't forgot to add the main key highway=service. (is corrected). commented 2025-11-19 20:03:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174696727 (Comments: 7) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 429) | Jak modyfikujesz coś i changeset wywali na pół Polski to wpisz komentarz co się stało commented 2025-11-19 19:56:56 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦25 |
| 174869418 (Comments: 1) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | Please deleted legal form out of the company name. commented 2025-11-19 19:56:51 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174871496 (Comments: 1) | hheyman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You add some nodes like https://www.osm.org/node/13316995160, https://www.osm.org/node/13316995156 (two of eight) with the tags addr:street = crossing crossing = uncontrolled crossing:markings = yes What is the mean of thi... commented 2025-11-19 19:56:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174869224 (Comments: 1) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi again, Please check the their website; according to it, the information company is located elsewhere. https://www.unity3dprints.com/ Happy mapping, Edwin Comino https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624 commented 2025-11-19 19:51:06 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174869629 (Comments: 1) | ChanceOfDizzySpells (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi there, Please do not use all capital letters in names. So no “DIXWELL AVENUE” but “Dixwell Avenue”. Please change. Happy mapping, Edwin Comino https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624 commented 2025-11-19 19:44:34 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
 | 174815712 (Comments: 2) | alexis_averty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partial revert to restore this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174876154 commented 2025-11-19 19:43:31 UTC by dgmapping ♦69 |
| 104809335 (Comments: 3) | martiensch (Discussed changesets: 31) | Ah duidelijk. Dan laat ik die verder weg. commented 2025-11-19 19:35:49 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦691 |
| 174861307 (Comments: 2) | WaF10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bien vu ! Merci pour la revue. commented 2025-11-19 19:31:22 UTC by WaF10 ♦1 |
| 174834728 (Comments: 2) | Kabads (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174875170 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174834728 commented 2025-11-19 19:29:07 UTC by RushMM ♦6 |
| 174862555 (Comments: 1) | Joacotrim21 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola. Layer no tiene ningun sentido en este caso. No entiendo mucho la obsesión por usarlo. Con convered basta. Qué estás intentando hacer? la idea es ayudar. Mientras tanto voy a sacar ese tag. --- ... commented 2025-11-19 19:17:05 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,598 |
| 174873271 (Comments: 2) | Yej (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Kartenbearbeitungen: "Feuerhydrant mit unterirdischem Typ hinzugefügt" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added fire hydrant with ... commented 2025-11-19 19:16:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174870943 (Comments: 2) | Jgiard6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'll check again but the Forest Preserve changed a lot of that area recently. Did not find that path at all. commented 2025-11-19 19:16:44 UTC by Jgiard6 ♦1 |
| 174830529 (Comments: 1) | h9vy2zu94xqq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you imported a large amount of data here. What is the source of the data? Is it available under a license compatible with OSM? Where can we find the mandatory documentation of the import? Please read our import guidelines: https://wi... commented 2025-11-19 19:16:12 UTC by mueschel ♦6,730 |
| 174436319 (Comments: 3) | MatthewAndersonUS80 (Discussed changesets: 35) | This is Old 𝗨𝗦 Highway 91, not Old Utah State Route 91, so of course the number "91" won't appear inside a beehive shape. On the contrary, it also does not appear in a brown rectangle like Historic Route 66 does. I actually made ... commented 2025-11-19 19:10:03 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦134 |
| 174798492 (Comments: 1) | Master PoPo (Discussed changesets: 1) | two cameras on same pole, other camera faces towards school entrance commented 2025-11-19 19:09:11 UTC by Master PoPo ♦1 |
| 174855512 (Comments: 2) | lukbas (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hej. Rzeczywiście zbiór obiektów jest multiadresem. W Bydgoszczy przeglądając OSM jest tego sporo. Zaraz poprawię dla tej szkoły. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. Pozdr commented 2025-11-19 19:05:23 UTC by lukbas ♦20 |
 | 174503354 (Comments: 3) | acarin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted random Antarctic doodling https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174874312 commented 2025-11-19 19:02:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174501623 (Comments: 1) | acarin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted random Antarctic doodling https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174874312 commented 2025-11-19 19:02:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174503163 (Comments: 1) | acarin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted random Antarctic doodling https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174874312 commented 2025-11-19 19:02:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174503576 (Comments: 2) | acarin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted random Antarctic doodling https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174874312 commented 2025-11-19 19:02:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174871552 (Comments: 1) | terrorist (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174874050 commented 2025-11-19 18:57:14 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174871152 (Comments: 1) | terrorist (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174874050 commented 2025-11-19 18:57:13 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174871451 (Comments: 1) | terrorist (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174874050 commented 2025-11-19 18:57:13 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174871535 (Comments: 1) | terrorist (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174874050 commented 2025-11-19 18:57:13 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174837324 (Comments: 1) | infopetal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Did you want to add name="Roger Brown Home and Studio" too? commented 2025-11-19 18:52:23 UTC by ion_chi ♦42 |
| 174870320 (Comments: 1) | CTC57212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag CT, Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. feedback Het gehele stuk zal niet alleen een highway=footway zijn, maar ook gedeeltelijk een highway=track ... commented 2025-11-19 18:51:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 163795738 (Comments: 1) | DerSchmopf (Discussed changesets: 10) | Heute habe ich alle Lücken im linksrheinischen Jakobsweg korrigiert. Viel mir diese Änderung von dir auf: Du hast du dieses Stück des Jakobswegs ans Ende bei Bingen angehängt. Achte das nächste mal bei solchen Aktionen... commented 2025-11-19 18:44:31 UTC by bernward1 ♦21 |
| 174833094 (Comments: 3) | kamilbogacki (Discussed changesets: 19) | Tam nie ma nazwy ulicy. commented 2025-11-19 18:38:43 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦25 |
| 174478608 (Comments: 6) | ThomasDeutsch (Discussed changesets: 2) | The use of Google as a source is strictly prohibited by Google. commented 2025-11-19 18:34:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174829436 (Comments: 1) | Estevet24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, bienvenido a OSM, para elementos que no tienen numero de calle tenemos etiqueta específica que debemos usar, es nohousenumber=yes, tienes más info en la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nohousenumber Cualquier du... commented 2025-11-19 18:26:44 UTC by aTarom ♦841 |
| 174823120 (Comments: 2) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 139) | War höchstwahrscheinlich beim kopieren u. einfügen unbewusst markiert. Habe die Linie wieder gelöscht. Danke für die Info. commented 2025-11-19 18:24:59 UTC by surveyor54 ♦661 |
| 174821553 (Comments: 1) | AliKarabulut1956 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Lütfen düzenlemelerinize açıklama yazın. Noktayı yanlışlıkla taşımışsınız, düzelttim. commented 2025-11-19 18:21:30 UTC by keyyushi ♦13 |
| 174773043 (Comments: 2) | Johann200104 (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem, and thanks for pointing that out. I was actually following instructions from the project: #hotosm-project-33369 at that moment. Based on the geometry of a hedge, your point is absolutely correct. Best regards commented 2025-11-19 18:13:23 UTC by Johann200104 ♦1 |
| 174838883 (Comments: 1) | soniclinx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please remember to save your changes in one area before moving on to another, so that it makes changes easier to review. Thanks! commented 2025-11-19 18:13:09 UTC by impiaaa ♦447 |
| 174867298 (Comments: 1) | DataDora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please try to be more descriptive in your changeset comment about what you changed and why. For example, "Tag that roads have a separate sidewalk way." More examples here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks! commented 2025-11-19 18:10:20 UTC by impiaaa ♦447 |
| 174870376 (Comments: 1) | MapBritan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please try to be more descriptive in your changeset comment about what you changed and why. For example, "Added traffic_signals=signal tag to traffic signal nodes." More examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changes... commented 2025-11-19 18:09:16 UTC by impiaaa ♦447 |
| 171910938 (Comments: 1) | lf22music (Discussed changesets: 21) | Można rowerem jeździć po terenie lotniska? commented 2025-11-19 18:03:32 UTC by Mercanto123 ♦12 |
| 173786003 (Comments: 1) | malibu16 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo malibu16, mit diesem Changeset hast Du in Erbstadt neben Hauptstraße 47 die Hausnummer 49 eingetragen. Hast Du Dich da evtl. vertan. Es gibt jetzt eine Fehlermeldung dazu und auf der Hauptstraße gibt es ein paar Meter weiter b... commented 2025-11-19 17:54:21 UTC by Gino-52 ♦77 |
| 174830516 (Comments: 1) | AUZH12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Doublon, Lavit existe déjà. commented 2025-11-19 17:49:59 UTC by Koalibou ♦4 |
| 174830572 (Comments: 1) | AUZH12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Doublon, Mas de Roubert existe déjà... commented 2025-11-19 17:47:52 UTC by Koalibou ♦4 |
| 174830622 (Comments: 1) | AUZH12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Doublon, ce hameau existe déjà... commented 2025-11-19 17:45:17 UTC by Koalibou ♦4 |
| 174830746 (Comments: 1) | AUZH12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Doublon... Chatusses existe déjà, pourquoi rajouter Quartier de Chatusses juste à côté ? commented 2025-11-19 17:44:00 UTC by Koalibou ♦4 |
| 174830817 (Comments: 1) | AUZH12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Idem, encore un doublon... commented 2025-11-19 17:41:51 UTC by Koalibou ♦4 |
| 174830870 (Comments: 1) | AUZH12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Doublon, le hameau de Poujols existe déjà sur la carte. Merci d'arrêter de faire des doublons partout... commented 2025-11-19 17:40:04 UTC by Koalibou ♦4 |
| 174686470 (Comments: 2) | alex_koebrunn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Mike, Du hast recht, das nördlichste Haus auf dem Grundstück ist die Nummer 5. Die Badausstellung von R+F hat die Hausnummer 7. Das scheint aber falsch hinterlegt zu sein. Grüße Alex commented 2025-11-19 17:36:53 UTC by alex_koebrunn ♦1 |
| 174866659 (Comments: 2) | ThomCJ (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🙏 Pardon de ne pas avoir fait attention à cette relation, merci pour la réactivité ! commented 2025-11-19 17:13:24 UTC by ThomCJ ♦3 |
| 174867486 (Comments: 1) | ChrisdeVries (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Chris.... Welk bord staat hier vooraan? Een onderbord bestemmingsverkeer? Er staat C12 getagd. Dat is niet motor_vehicle=yes Is zal er = destination van maken. commented 2025-11-19 17:05:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 172114842 (Comments: 3) | Aradrin (Discussed changesets: 26) | Merci pour ton retour et ta compréhension :) Je t'avoue que là je manque de temps pour lancer un nouveau sujet sur le forum 😅 Est-ce que tu serais d'accord pour un highway=footway +footway=crossing/sidewalk bicycle=ye... commented 2025-11-19 17:04:57 UTC by CartoCharles ♦62 |
| 174822027 (Comments: 11) | suiluj_julius (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ahh.. mooi.. dat dacht ik al. Kon me al niet voorstellen dat het G13 zou zijn. Ik heb alles aangepast naar G11 en de hoofdrijbaan op slot gezet met bicycle=use_sidepath. Nu gaat alles daar op de schop of is al op de schop geweest. H... commented 2025-11-19 16:53:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174863738 (Comments: 1) | Angela Edmonds (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not add a tag area=yes to a hedge. A hedge is a liniar object. Not an area. And Map more precise by following the hedge lines. Best regards commented 2025-11-19 16:49:57 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174782089 (Comments: 1) | MaliMrav (Discussed changesets: 6) | Changeset je super, ne komentarišem zbog toga:), primetio sam ga na https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/st/wrong_names/BELA%20CRKVA.html. Ako ikad vidiš još ovakvih stvari, javi da ispravim kako normalizujemo RGZ ulicu! commented 2025-11-19 16:44:50 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦333 |
| 173896797 (Comments: 1) | Nardose Hailu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Thanks for mapping. please, map only hedges where they are visible as a long continuing line (green) , enclosing or bordering an area. Don't add the tag area=yes to a hedge. A hedge is a borderline. Not an area. Best regards, a... commented 2025-11-19 16:43:35 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174865950 (Comments: 1) | ziomio (Discussed changesets: 17) | https://www.agenziapo.it/content/cassa-di-espansione-del-torrente-baganza commented 2025-11-19 16:29:37 UTC by ziomio ♦16 |
| 174866028 (Comments: 1) | ziomio (Discussed changesets: 17) | https://www.agenziapo.it/content/cassa-di-espansione-del-torrente-baganza commented 2025-11-19 16:29:20 UTC by ziomio ♦16 |
| 174867304 (Comments: 1) | ziomio (Discussed changesets: 17) | https://www.agenziapo.it/content/cassa-di-espansione-del-torrente-baganza commented 2025-11-19 16:29:04 UTC by ziomio ♦16 |
| 109457542 (Comments: 1) | MA Barracus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola, ¿los nombres de los senderos los sacaste de algún lugar?. ¿Podrías dar referencias sobre estos? No parecen nombres propios y he comprobado que la mayoría estaban desconectados de los caminos, no sé l... commented 2025-11-19 16:24:24 UTC by kapazao ♦943 |
| 171939556 (Comments: 1) | velocitas7 (Discussed changesets: 3) | What is tunnel=cave? You should not tag for the router. If tunnel=yes is ignored by the route planner you should raise an issue with them. commented 2025-11-19 16:17:34 UTC by ntzm ♦42 |
| 172539057 (Comments: 2) | foreigner037 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Legislative road classification does not necessarily translate to OSM classification 1:1. There are multiple examples both in and outside Bulgaria where that is the case. commented 2025-11-19 16:17:28 UTC by foreigner037 ♦69 |
| 174865401 (Comments: 1) | mentz_hde (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo Mentz, nur so zu Info: Gleise und Fahrbahnen sind separate Elemente und sind auf OSM auch deswegen separat zu erfassen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embedded_rails#Motivation_and_Rationale Das Taggen von bus=yes an Gleisen ... commented 2025-11-19 16:13:16 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦239 |
| 174863749 (Comments: 3) | Gianluca lama (Discussed changesets: 3) | Grazie mille, ivanbranco. Per me queste modifiche sembrano in qualche modo automatizzate. Normalmente con l’editor iD non si possono gestire così tanti changeset in un periodo di tempo così breve. Per non parlare poi dei da... commented 2025-11-19 16:06:25 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174864885 (Comments: 1) | s1ken (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, adressepunkterne i OSM bliver automatisk opdateret fra Danmarks Adresser. Hvis din ændring skal være permanent, er du nødt til at informere Aalborg Kommune om fejlen. Det er kommunen som placerer punkterne. Revertet commented 2025-11-19 16:05:35 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,723 |
| 174698571 (Comments: 2) | PinkBluWht (Discussed changesets: 1) | 此外，对于尚未完成的建筑，在OSM中请不要标注为 building=yes 可以尝试使用 building=construction 因为建筑物尚未完工，但在现实中已存在足够可观测到的实体。这是为了与实地求是的基... commented 2025-11-19 15:48:04 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦564 |
| 174590341 (Comments: 3) | GSF1200S (Discussed changesets: 26) | 了解了，谢谢解答 commented 2025-11-19 15:27:52 UTC by Higashimado ♦8 |
| 168122781 (Comments: 1) | ramshi04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | why should a Hospital have a landuse tag? commented 2025-11-19 15:14:28 UTC by mrKhan ♦3 |
| 174834330 (Comments: 1) | Orion-Tech (Discussed changesets: 1) | building=detached is ideal for individual houses. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174834330 commented 2025-11-19 15:11:51 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 174861097 (Comments: 1) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 67) | gazeta podała tylko plany, zmiana odbyła się dopiero przed 16 commented 2025-11-19 15:11:14 UTC by Bartek444 ♦29 |
| 167484529 (Comments: 5) | thefabi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo, You cannot use a wikipedia/wikidata as a source of truth, you'll need something more official, like the Ajuntament d'Eivissa website you provided (pdf version: https://www.eivissa.es/documents/34357/51577/BARRIS.pdf). Notice t... commented 2025-11-19 15:07:43 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦223 |
| 174096921 (Comments: 1) | boazs64 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi This is really a wall, the road marked near it as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207971694. Please revert your change. commented 2025-11-19 15:07:01 UTC by Sanniu ♦585 |
| 174862880 (Comments: 2) | Andreea Vintila (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated path with intermittent status, removed river waterway designation" commented 2025-11-19 14:56:57 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174539120 (Comments: 4) | ejderuby (Discussed changesets: 2) | Did you have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449937691/history/1? commented 2025-11-19 14:48:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 173772069 (Comments: 5) | noam15A (Discussed changesets: 4) | Great! :) commented 2025-11-19 14:47:49 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 174862599 (Comments: 2) | sandraurbano (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aquí está un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Agregué casas, terrazas y edificios, eliminé una designación de reserva natural" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comme... commented 2025-11-19 14:47:23 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 173815414 (Comments: 1) | kwynt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Signals are tagged as a point on the track (instead of the real location). Please check the wiki for further instructions. Then remove your signal, because it already exists on the track. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsignal commented 2025-11-19 14:44:48 UTC by mmis-berg ♦12 |
| 174859285 (Comments: 1) | qwartnum (Discussed changesets: 1) | As these are normal cyle & footways, where only on one day some people cycled around with special bikes, I would not have the parts as tracks. You could theoretically make a relation and put the normal bike path parts into them, and then use trai... commented 2025-11-19 14:43:43 UTC by emergency99 ♦292 |
| 174859024 (Comments: 1) | Tinus4338 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De format van de phone heb ik aangepast naar +31.. en de BAG data hersteld. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-19 14:31:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
 | 172139505 (Comments: 1) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 97) | Hi, I've just see you edits. Where did you find the english name for "곰도" ("곰섬") https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16380436 ? The US NGA (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency) absolutely don't us... commented 2025-11-19 14:28:08 UTC by Koreller ♦56 |
| 174832532 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26HL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! Please don't add any private information. commented 2025-11-19 14:19:04 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174834062 (Comments: 2) | MSHS26CSN2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I merge the booth overlapping buildings. Please see https://www.osm.org/way/1412965268! commented 2025-11-19 14:11:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174811824 (Comments: 2) | Rubenke (Discussed changesets: 73) | De Maten nu ook als naam toegevoegd commented 2025-11-19 14:08:07 UTC by Rubenke ♦45 |
| 174808675 (Comments: 2) | Ben Dezar (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ok. Dzięki! commented 2025-11-19 13:55:59 UTC by Ben Dezar ♦5 |
| 174854145 (Comments: 2) | fmc_8 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Danke dir, hab es angepasst! commented 2025-11-19 13:49:23 UTC by fmc_8 ♦4 |
| 174854305 (Comments: 2) | Macarena Taravilla (Discussed changesets: 2) | It was intentional and correct. I am part of City Management Department. All this parking are now handed over to Real Estate and development department, for future uses. Said in another words, this is no longer carpark, but a construction plot commented 2025-11-19 13:30:06 UTC by Macarena Taravilla ♦1 |
| 174670057 (Comments: 1) | elmanxgod (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, a railway=station object is still needed for a complete metro station relation. the stop positions on the track alone are not sufficient. I've reverted the deletion of the station in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174859464 commented 2025-11-19 13:28:59 UTC by Claudius Henrichs ♦218 |
| 174858833 (Comments: 1) | Curni_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2025-11-19 13:14:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174858312 (Comments: 2) | Curni_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi, Het is gelukt om aan het passen, Dankje voor de tips gr. Curni commented 2025-11-19 13:12:17 UTC by Curni_ ♦3 |
| 38212941 (Comments: 1) | retselkim (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi @retselkim, Thanks for mapping these, it certainly makes them a lot easier to handle when on the ground, however a non-zero number of these were tagged as houses but are actually terraces/apartments (or two semi-detached houses mapped as on... commented 2025-11-19 13:07:48 UTC by Peter Newman ♦34 |
| 161539670 (Comments: 3) | fernerknott (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo fernerknott, wurde denn diese großflächige Einführung/Änderung vorher wo diskutiert? Bitte um Beteiligung im Forumsthread dazu: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bezeichnung-von-gebirgszugen/58971/ commented 2025-11-19 13:04:31 UTC by PPete2 ♦134 |
| 174857329 (Comments: 2) | Curni_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi eggie, ik heb de landuse aangepast. Wellicht heb ik nog een klein foutje gemaakt maar nu staat het als het goed is goed. Laat maar weten als ik nog iets moet verduidelijken. gr. Corné commented 2025-11-19 12:59:07 UTC by Curni_ ♦3 |
| 174856932 (Comments: 3) | Reinier Den Uijl (Discussed changesets: 22) | Laat maar weten of je hulp nodig hebt. gr eggie commented 2025-11-19 12:46:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174857103 (Comments: 1) | Reinier Den Uijl (Discussed changesets: 22) | Prima dat het een seniorenwoning is, maar gebruien dan niet name=... om iets te beschrijven. Ik haal name=............... weer weg. We taggen ook niet name= huis name=tuin name=bankje Evt kun je wel description gebruiken, maar waarom zou je... commented 2025-11-19 12:40:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174857026 (Comments: 1) | Reinier Den Uijl (Discussed changesets: 22) | Zelfde verhaal. Evt een terugmelding doen. Wanneer het alleen een carport is dan building=roof gebruiken. met layer =1 commented 2025-11-19 12:37:40 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174856501 (Comments: 1) | Keith Yoder (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Those are the car charges; there are 6 more categories. They can vary over years or months and sometimes depend on the time of the day. Is not that easy. regards --- Published using OSMCh... commented 2025-11-19 12:32:09 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,598 |
| 173880129 (Comments: 5) | elmira_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Elmira, thank you for understanding and working together. I noticed another issue with your change. Shortening the motor_vehicle:conditional key as you did may have been better for clarity, but I realized that the new value of the key results ... commented 2025-11-19 12:12:02 UTC by kitto33 ♦5 |
| 174856090 (Comments: 1) | Wonderful Alligator (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi... Wanneer er geen weg is kun je het er ook niet mee niet verbinden. Het lijkt me oke zo. Groet, eggie commented 2025-11-19 12:10:42 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
 | 174851012 (Comments: 1) | Lygence (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Lygence, you deleted 2 bus stops here. Please avoid deleting objects with which you may lack an understanding. commented 2025-11-19 12:01:48 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦113 |
| 174814814 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 68) | tbf I was not aware there was an island embedded to the "forest tree". commented 2025-11-19 11:58:33 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦63 |
| 174854419 (Comments: 1) | peter sinot (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Peter, Het hek ontbrak in de tagging en zat vast aan het bos. Ik heb het nu vastgemaakt aan de wef met barrier=gate en access=yes Je kunt de positie nog even checken. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-19 11:57:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174828203 (Comments: 1) | Vescand (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes commented 2025-11-19 11:55:50 UTC by MaxPower14 ♦1 |
| 174850058 (Comments: 1) | Lygence (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Lygence, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing to the map in Ghana. Note that in OSM we don't abbreviate names (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations). So avoid editing existing names to abbreviations or adding new ones like ... commented 2025-11-19 11:52:36 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦113 |
| 174819928 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 68) | The problem with this section of Canton Road is that... I don't see/agree its importance. This section doesn't really do anything; why would anyone use this section to turn towards Mong Kok Road? It realistically can't turn towa... commented 2025-11-19 11:49:20 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦63 |
| 121020170 (Comments: 5) | MrLusignana (Discussed changesets: 9) | fiokolyisa@duck.com commented 2025-11-19 11:41:35 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦130 |
| 174796832 (Comments: 2) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 22) | Danke für den Hinweis. Habe beide Relationen verlegt und eine neu sortiert. Bei der anderen lässt mich relatify nicht speichern. commented 2025-11-19 11:40:48 UTC by akino_germany ♦21 |
| 174833443 (Comments: 1) | Uncle181 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merci pour les corrections. Si tu veux annuler les contribution du contributeur problématique, avec JOSM tu as un plugin reverter qui fera le travail aussi :) commented 2025-11-19 11:35:12 UTC by CartoCharles ♦62 |
| 174796152 (Comments: 2) | mothbelly (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks :) it might not be worthwhile though. From memory it was mostly residental, with just a few shops nearby (crash repair, barber). I'll have a better look next time I'm down that way. commented 2025-11-19 11:30:05 UTC by mothbelly ♦2 |
 | 174837147 (Comments: 1) | AmityAge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-11-19 11:24:37 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
 | 174804666 (Comments: 1) | Layft Greater (Discussed changesets: 59) | I hate 'hw=service' for park alleys with a passion as it contradicts every part of 'service road' definition in the wiki, but there is probably no better option. Sigh. commented 2025-11-19 11:11:59 UTC by mos_next_door ♦24 |
| 169570897 (Comments: 2) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 386) | Du er velkommen til at navngive vejene. Kommunens plan: https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/navngivneveje/471c5f30-ec2f-4f98-8622-d4de4d283031?format=json commented 2025-11-19 11:05:26 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,723 |
| 170444937 (Comments: 1) | Ndangane (Discussed changesets: 5) | bonjour, si j'en crois le siret et ma connaissance c'est davantage un cordonnier qu'un spécialiste de clé ? je pense le repasser en cordonnier craft=shoemaker et ajouter key_cutter=yes pour préciser qu�... commented 2025-11-19 10:56:05 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,278 |
| 174835720 (Comments: 2) | Pinotraffic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pinotraffic, De wijzigingen zijn prima gelukt. Er zijn geen routerelaties beschadigd. Het is goed om te weten dat de editor iD niet geschikt is om routerelaties te bewerken. Dat leidt altijd tot een beschadigde routerelatie. Als ee... commented 2025-11-19 10:39:39 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,399 |
| 174769239 (Comments: 3) | szigyi222 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Visszavonva. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174852626 commented 2025-11-19 10:37:19 UTC by infeeeee ♦608 |
| 174849523 (Comments: 2) | WingChoi (Discussed changesets: 1) | 6. Baby Care Center is not a `shop=baby_goods` commented 2025-11-19 10:32:42 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,658 |
| 174850484 (Comments: 7) | vanmelle (Discussed changesets: 3) | aanvulling.. En als het los zand is dan natuurlijk surface=sand commented 2025-11-19 10:28:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174161850 (Comments: 1) | gmar5 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Nice one, thanks for adding to this - I've had quite some fun trying to research the boundaries are for different suburbs of Oxford. Obviously it's somewhat blurry but I like these definitions personally. commented 2025-11-19 10:15:47 UTC by rising-mistake ♦20 |
| 156644540 (Comments: 1) | seanthlin (Discussed changesets: 10) | OSM 的規格是一個東西各一個點，請不要隨意合併！ commented 2025-11-19 10:06:08 UTC by WWSS ♦18 |
| 174850581 (Comments: 1) | vanmelle (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag vanmelle Ik heb construction = house toegevoegd MVG eggie commented 2025-11-19 09:56:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174319991 (Comments: 2) | inanchu (Discussed changesets: 1) | I fixed the forest. 森林を修正しました。 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174850637 commented 2025-11-19 09:51:54 UTC by Smokin' Billy ♦8 |
| 174850026 (Comments: 3) | emmespavn (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174850583 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-11-19 09:44:50 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174846871 (Comments: 4) | Wonderful Alligator (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ik heb het bouwterrein wat kleiner gemaakt en de woonstraat ingetekend. Dan zal die kraan ook wel weer opschuiven. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@50.85564,5.717788,18/?datastrip=20250629_SVNEO-01 commented 2025-11-19 09:39:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174708967 (Comments: 3) | Mr Walrus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Think about the 'dual' bit. They come in pairs. Individual way tagging can be done of course, but then which is the paired carriageway? Fetch all dual_carriageway ways then correlate by name/ref/geography? What if those aren’t consist... commented 2025-11-19 09:37:31 UTC by Pink Duck ♦162 |
| 174821862 (Comments: 3) | suiluj_julius (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi.... Oorzaak is het schuiven met de kaart in editmodus met editor iD Je schuift met de linker muisknop, maar na een onbedoelde selectie met de linker muisknop schuift niet de kaart, maar bv een adresnode.. of een kruispunt met alles dat er aan va... commented 2025-11-19 09:35:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174725693 (Comments: 3) | True Precision Rehab (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174760490 commented 2025-11-19 09:34:26 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174754122 (Comments: 3) | Preventive Pest Control St George (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174759298 commented 2025-11-19 09:33:28 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174742928 (Comments: 2) | Taller H (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174801496 commented 2025-11-19 09:32:52 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174741504 (Comments: 2) | Nila outfit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174765818 commented 2025-11-19 09:25:41 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174757345 (Comments: 1) | Flowjo1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174849735 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-11-19 09:22:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 172216417 (Comments: 3) | Joerg Fischer (Discussed changesets: 7) | Diskussion nach https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/offentlicher-weg-durch-privatperson-gesperrt-wie-mappen/138282 ausgelagert. commented 2025-11-19 09:22:11 UTC by jefle ♦6 |
| 174757311 (Comments: 3) | Flowjo1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174849704 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-11-19 09:21:40 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174770957 (Comments: 4) | ABW Shop (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174771868 commented 2025-11-19 09:21:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174776179 (Comments: 3) | Xibit Solutions SEO (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174777436 commented 2025-11-19 09:20:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174767354 (Comments: 2) | DepicZoran (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174831621 commented 2025-11-19 09:19:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174789576 (Comments: 3) | 500370622 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174849589 commented 2025-11-19 09:18:40 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174801147 (Comments: 3) | scovazzo (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174805363 commented 2025-11-19 09:18:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174805086 (Comments: 3) | aronowitzmdca (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174824443 commented 2025-11-19 09:17:51 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174806729 (Comments: 3) | Namaste Nepal Rajan (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174849520 commented 2025-11-19 09:17:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174809837 (Comments: 3) | Andrew Finlinson (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174849499 commented 2025-11-19 09:16:49 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174812313 (Comments: 3) | industrialdemolitionandmetalmanagement (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174824142 commented 2025-11-19 09:16:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174812053 (Comments: 2) | Jr@n123456 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174818559 commented 2025-11-19 09:15:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174817901 (Comments: 2) | سالن شیده (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174849304 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-11-19 09:11:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 165209888 (Comments: 1) | Lucapa (Discussed changesets: 42) | Ciao. Nella Centrale Cavallero Hai messo building=industrial landuse=industrial Che non ha nessun senso. landuse su usa per un area usata per uno scopo. building si applica su un edificio. Visto che quello che è ma... commented 2025-11-19 09:09:21 UTC by Jrachi ♦807 |
| 174846968 (Comments: 1) | Sembi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Sembi Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Sinnvollerweise erfasst du deine Praxis nicht als sog. Tag auf dem Gebäude, sondern als einzelnen Punkt *im... commented 2025-11-19 09:09:16 UTC by habi ♦1,969 |
| 174660212 (Comments: 2) | JAVGON (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174827177 commented 2025-11-19 09:08:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174687955 (Comments: 2) | Useiname (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174849089 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-11-19 09:06:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174808568 (Comments: 2) | bar the goat (Discussed changesets: 1) | בנוסף, אני מבין שזה שביל ארוך, אז הוא אמור להיות יחס שאוסף את את כל החלקים ולא סימון של שם בנפרד על כל חלק. יצרתי יחס מתאים ואתה מוזמן להוסיף... commented 2025-11-19 08:57:58 UTC by hatul ♦420 |
| 174521989 (Comments: 3) | Rico557 (Discussed changesets: 63) | адрес по картотеке мало о чем говорит, но вот у белпошты да. по хорошемы, нейм - общеупотребительное название. нужет опрос местных commented 2025-11-19 08:55:06 UTC by 4004 ♦1,923 |
| 163370607 (Comments: 2) | StijnRR (Discussed changesets: 41) | Zoals je op Geopunt kan zien (Mobiliteit - Transport over land - Aanhorigheden van genummerde wegen - Beheersegmenten) zijn er weldegelijk verschillende N-wegen met de gemeente als wegbeheerder. commented 2025-11-19 08:53:46 UTC by StijnRR ♦51 |
| 174847909 (Comments: 1) | DriesO (Discussed changesets: 2) | het systeem heeft bij deze bewerking een tramhalte (tram_stop) onverklaarbaar in een bushalte (bus_stop) veranderd... commented 2025-11-19 08:49:43 UTC by DriesO ♦1 |
| 164332641 (Comments: 3) | moshikosh (Discussed changesets: 6) | Yes, it can be observed on aeral, will fix accordingly commented 2025-11-19 08:48:32 UTC by Sanniu ♦585 |
| 91121907 (Comments: 2) | Antanicus (Discussed changesets: 14) | As it was still as node, I finally fixed it now by restoring the original item. commented 2025-11-19 08:45:43 UTC by dieterdreist ♦875 |
| 174643936 (Comments: 2) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi NLBRT, Thank you very much for acknowledging this. I am always happy to contribute to improving the map. These edits were made using TomTom proprietary GPS traces. I will ensure to mention proprietary sources more clearly in my future e... commented 2025-11-19 08:40:43 UTC by 007Transformer ♦14 |
| 174821905 (Comments: 2) | gallseife (Discussed changesets: 36) | Sehr schön, board:title gefällt mir :) commented 2025-11-19 08:39:54 UTC by gallseife ♦47 |
| 174837606 (Comments: 1) | КИК-ТЕХНИК (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравейте! Благодаря, че добавихте този обект. Адрес не е необходимо да се вписва, той вече е отбелязан върху полигона на блока. Мисля да н... commented 2025-11-19 08:32:27 UTC by Fraxi ♦190 |
| 174410156 (Comments: 3) | Bigismall (Discussed changesets: 3) | EDIT: Na Google Maps widać już te płyty, zarówno na Balladyny jak i na Cyprysowej https://www.google.com/maps/@54.3806853,18.4065193,224m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=pl&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTExNi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D commented 2025-11-19 08:24:39 UTC by Bigismall ♦3 |
| 174227306 (Comments: 1) | Barbara Ogori (Discussed changesets: 15) | hello thank you for your mapping , you mapped few empty space as building, i fixed them . commented 2025-11-19 08:21:59 UTC by Samwel Kyando ♦12 |
| 168254321 (Comments: 1) | kipkuruienock (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your mapping unfortunately you alot of empty spaces and tag them as building = yes i deleted them commented 2025-11-19 08:16:47 UTC by Samwel Kyando ♦12 |
| 174769037 (Comments: 1) | LuBratzel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, bei der verlegten Bushaltestelle fehlt der Namen. Da der Knoten in gleicher Weise wie der alte Knoten verwendet wurde, ist es besser den Knoten zu verschieben (event. voher ablösen) und somit dessen history zu erhalten. G... commented 2025-11-19 08:15:49 UTC by Lokai ♦483 |
| 174811563 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 10) | Здравствуйте, есть вопрос по этим наименованиям. Почему именно "Боровск-Москва с.д."? Это во-первых некрасиво выглядит, а во-вторых ... commented 2025-11-19 08:10:56 UTC by Ivanov Sergey ♦11 |
| 174845927 (Comments: 1) | WereldBolt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-19 08:01:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 99687795 (Comments: 1) | zaneto (Discussed changesets: 5) | Quali sono le fonti per dare il nome "Troi de logje" ? commented 2025-11-19 07:10:22 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦112 |
| 174821895 (Comments: 3) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 47) | They can, in case that road passes through a building as a passage. You need some visual confirmation from the ground to determine that (like Mapillary, Wikimedia Commons or... well, there are few other sources that you can legally use for mapping OS... commented 2025-11-19 07:08:57 UTC by yelisey90 ♦199 |
| 170849934 (Comments: 1) | K0wWypRQG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin aus Wildeshausen! Ich kann leider auf die Quelle https://archive.ph/XgqVQ nicht zugreifen. Zum access=destination etc: Am südlichen Ende habe ich am 15.11. ganz andere Beschränkungen gefunden: "Verbot für Radverke... commented 2025-11-19 06:55:20 UTC by GerdP ♦2,789 |
| X | 174751094 (Comments: 1) | Snowghost235 (Discussed changesets: 1) | also modified some lifts over in europe. Same source? commented 2025-11-19 06:42:13 UTC by synthfi ♦4 |
| 155963724 (Comments: 1) | teambuildingonwheels (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, I have moved it to what seems to be the correct localisation 174 Albertlaan https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174844639 Feel free to review commented 2025-11-19 06:37:20 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,308 |
| 146701755 (Comments: 1) | fenestrono (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi fenestrono. While working on roads, I came by your campsite edits and wanted to reach out. Individual camping spots need to be tagged as "Camp Pitch" instead of the camp site, which is used to define large grounds designated for camping.... commented 2025-11-19 06:23:32 UTC by unen ♦20 |
| 174804039 (Comments: 2) | Sam Cate (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi there, changed it to service road with gravel as surface --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174804039 commented 2025-11-19 06:22:01 UTC by Sam Cate ♦3 |
| 174799730 (Comments: 1) | Melissa69420 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Melissa69420, I have been reviewing your edits to OpenStreetMap. I see you have added some Flock Safety automated license plate reader cameras. The locations where you have added the cameras to the map seem to not be correct. ... commented 2025-11-19 06:19:56 UTC by nullroute ♦6 |
| 174843756 (Comments: 2) | farhad65 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed locality and name details" commented 2025-11-19 06:06:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174843634 (Comments: 1) | maggot32footoot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting bad edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174843944 commented 2025-11-19 06:03:38 UTC by iandees ♦757 |
| 174843530 (Comments: 1) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 134) | Saludos, podrias averiguar el nombre de la poblacion ubicada en estas coordenadas: -19.568670 -67.021220 Gracias commented 2025-11-19 05:45:28 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,216 |
| 174842508 (Comments: 1) | 1538615423865283 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Good job👍🙂I added a couple more tags to cams, gantry and pole and adjusted the position of the street itself to be closer to the middle of the actal roadbed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmc... commented 2025-11-19 05:36:11 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,370 |
| 174800733 (Comments: 1) | Alex_Park (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a friendly tip: try to keep your changes smaller, like focusing on one country at a time. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2025-11-19 05:09:21 UTC by julcnx ♦414 |
| 174818670 (Comments: 2) | Ruslan Fatih (Discussed changesets: 12) | История правок то сохраняется . commented 2025-11-19 04:51:10 UTC by Русланкз ♦1 |
| 174815090 (Comments: 2) | manjurawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Baloo! My name is Manju, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment. As we discussed earlier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173982054#map=19/35.464086/-97.510757&layers=N, Our general approach is ... commented 2025-11-19 04:41:02 UTC by manjurawat_Lyft ♦5 |
| 173931864 (Comments: 1) | A_N_P (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola! Por favor, en tus próximos cambios evitá "arrastrar" nodos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9756264478). Gracias! commented 2025-11-19 04:35:22 UTC by FS Patagonia ♦24 |
| 174751420 (Comments: 7) | 1538615423865283 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Just added a gantry, please let me know if anything is incorrect. Thanks again for the help! commented 2025-11-19 04:33:01 UTC by 1538615423865283 ♦3 |
| 174629723 (Comments: 1) | guillemmal (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hola Guille! El cambio fue únicamente en el tramo que atraviesa el municipio de Neuquén (hace por lo menos dos años, en estos días se formalizó el traspaso). En Cipolletti y Plottier, sigue siendo "Ruta Naciona... commented 2025-11-19 04:29:51 UTC by FS Patagonia ♦24 |
| 174842363 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 60) | This edit isn't meant to completely fix the import issue. It just resolves the use of parcel cadastre data as landuse and resolves the overlapping landuse that results. commented 2025-11-19 04:26:44 UTC by eerib ♦211 |
| 174783601 (Comments: 5) | 000000001666 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also been using this and then looking on google map to confirm its location https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr commented 2025-11-19 04:26:24 UTC by 000000001666 ♦1 |
| 174754156 (Comments: 3) | 1538615423865283 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fixed. I am new to this, so I apologize for the mistake. commented 2025-11-19 04:11:54 UTC by 1538615423865283 ♦3 |
| 174751431 (Comments: 1) | 1538615423865283 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. This edit has the same issue as the previous one. Please disconnect camera from crosswalk commented 2025-11-19 04:04:34 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,370 |
| 148317413 (Comments: 3) | danguino (Discussed changesets: 1) | I went ahead (changeset 174842033) and deleted the separate cycleways, instead using the cycleway:both=lane and cycleway:both:buffer=yes tags on the roads themselves. This is how such cycleways in SoCal are overwhelmingly mapped. If you want ... commented 2025-11-19 04:00:59 UTC by CRCulver ♦202 |
| 169107025 (Comments: 2) | aaei924 (Discussed changesets: 19) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10985049 를 참고해 주시기 바랍니다. commented 2025-11-19 03:48:15 UTC by aaei924 ♦31 |
| 174841770 (Comments: 1) | CS2100 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This was in Fox Hill Subdivision, not Belcher Street commented 2025-11-19 03:42:03 UTC by CS2100 ♦2 |
| 174840128 (Comments: 2) | PJDee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated highway classifications, including primary, secondary, tertiary, and motorway roads, and changed oneway directions" commented 2025-11-19 02:06:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174158155 (Comments: 2) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 76) | Raczej nie. Poprawiłem commented 2025-11-19 01:46:07 UTC by czebureks ♦131 |
| 174671208 (Comments: 2) | Nick123GD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the feedback. I noticed some of my other changelists were updated to fix the phone number. I will be sure to use the E.164 from now on. commented 2025-11-19 01:41:51 UTC by Nick123GD ♦1 |
| 174752543 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 239) | sorry，误操作误操作，之前动边界时划到此地，查看边界时可能是不小心点击误触改变了边境 commented 2025-11-19 01:40:22 UTC by 3D打印 ♦1 |
| 174831140 (Comments: 1) | Croissant98520 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This name is more of a descriptive name which shouldn't be used for names. Rather, the operation should be called a "farm" of sorts and cannabis being their crop. commented 2025-11-19 01:33:50 UTC by gpserror ♦225 |
| 168952423 (Comments: 1) | NoelB (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2429261170/ There is a 50-metre gap in the R368. I suspect it isn't deliberate. :) commented 2025-11-19 01:20:09 UTC by VictorIE ♦966 |
| 174745593 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 196) | My pleasure. I appreciate the recognition! commented 2025-11-19 01:14:13 UTC by Joseph R P ♦380 |
| 174838981 (Comments: 2) | miniautome (Discussed changesets: 2) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Prodavnica modela automobila u Podgorici" commented 2025-11-19 01:03:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174812967 (Comments: 5) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | La voie de service était déjà cartographiée. Je lui avais juste donné un nom : coopérative agricole. commented 2025-11-19 01:03:25 UTC by eurelien ♦7 |
| 160617228 (Comments: 2) | lasagna (Discussed changesets: 11) | Go ahead and delete them commented 2025-11-19 00:38:23 UTC by lasagna ♦44 |
| 174838482 (Comments: 1) | galen8183 (Discussed changesets: 19) | ...at Bruce Power, large bbox is from editing Lake Huron! commented 2025-11-19 00:24:52 UTC by galen8183 ♦36 |
| 174837586 (Comments: 1) | gw010 (Discussed changesets: 3) | whats you source for this? commented 2025-11-19 00:24:24 UTC by Udarian ♦528 |
| 173070078 (Comments: 5) | 1Mmarek (Discussed changesets: 12) | Účel zakreslenia hrany bol, aby sa zachytil jej tvar, ale pravda, bez značiek to nie je ono. Na zastávke STU zaznačím tú hranu ako zastávku (ako je to na Riviére či Botanickej). Na Blumentál... commented 2025-11-19 00:16:07 UTC by 1Mmarek ♦8 |
| 174038976 (Comments: 1) | DavidDrax (Discussed changesets: 8) | The old MLK Center building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446608190 was demolished in 2023. It's since been replaced by a new building - corrected in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174837785 commented 2025-11-18 23:50:43 UTC by jandar22 ♦31 |
| 147241695 (Comments: 1) | Mirecnet (Discussed changesets: 139) | Zdravim, urcite je https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1247988145 horaren? Podla Ortofoto alebo napr. https://wa-uploads.profitroom.com/presidenthotelmontforttatry/17167273657522_xxdji0794.jpg to vyzera na vezu/vysielac. commented 2025-11-18 23:41:58 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 174510409 (Comments: 4) | Harshavardhan2000A (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you provide the details of official document such as URL etc or an extract of such document from which the changes are being made? commented 2025-11-18 23:36:50 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦573 |
| 174735190 (Comments: 1) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 42) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333494683/history/2 pourriez-vous arreter de détruire les noms de rues parfaitement valide et écraser ceux-ci avec le RegBL ? le nom officiel était parfaitement renseigné d... commented 2025-11-18 23:25:22 UTC by Marc_ch ♦288 |
| 174819852 (Comments: 2) | moturowiec (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://osm.org/relation/5655085 https://osm.org/relation/5655059 commented 2025-11-18 23:12:54 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦366 |
| 174068868 (Comments: 1) | yzuio (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank-you for this clean up, and sacrificing the amount of electricity pumping through your computer to edit everything :D commented 2025-11-18 23:08:11 UTC by 0235 ♦34 |
| 174805694 (Comments: 2) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 400) | I'll keep monitoring the user and report to DWG if necessary if there's no response after a reasonable amount of time or they do further damage in the meantime. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Publish... commented 2025-11-18 23:07:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦53 |
| 174799506 (Comments: 2) | nicomarvin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Given the spammy changeset comment, the lack of any intentional valid content to upload and the blatantly damaging nature of the change, it appears this may have been intentional (or at the very least severely misguided), and may need further escalat... commented 2025-11-18 23:03:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦53 |
| 167150574 (Comments: 6) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 168) | Natomiast zgadzam się z tym, że najlepiej by było, gdyby któryś został zatwierdzony, albo odwrotnie przestarzały, ale jak nikt takiej akcji nie podejmuje to w "naturalny sposób" można się do tego przyczynić, właśnie... commented 2025-11-18 23:00:59 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,178 |
| 173853598 (Comments: 1) | Panio (Discussed changesets: 5) | Panio, the EO38 does have a short branch at Agrinio, so that the road can connect with the EO5. Both the EO5 and EO38 used pass through the heart of the city at 38.624765, 21.409455, but bypasses and pedestrianisation changed where exactly the roads ... commented 2025-11-18 22:58:02 UTC by ika-chan! ♦304 |
| 174835076 (Comments: 3) | paolo@DIRTYJOBS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, I’m sure everything is perfectly legal; I have no doubt about that. We simply have to follow the OpenStreetMap (OSM) rules. These rules dictate how certain things must be tagged. For example, names written entirely in capi... commented 2025-11-18 22:55:18 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174792226 (Comments: 3) | FiveWho (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ma kakav revert, evo ispravio sam malo. Izveštaj bude svako jutro, ali uhvati podatke samo do 21h, pa ovo što sam sad ispravio će biti tek preksutra. Interesantno je da su Jezdine i Ćuove zvanično zaseoci i obično su to u RGZ-u samo... commented 2025-11-18 22:50:18 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦333 |
| 174836230 (Comments: 2) | Albin Alfaro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aquí está un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Actualizadas la dirección y los métodos de pago, incluyendo efectivo, tarjetas de crédito y débito" (Auto-translation) ---... commented 2025-11-18 22:46:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174836025 (Comments: 1) | Psztomol (Discussed changesets: 80) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2191238651 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-11-18 22:40:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 173276228 (Comments: 1) | jaap de vries (Discussed changesets: 134) | Waarvoor weer al dit verwijderen van dingen waar niks mis mee is? commented 2025-11-18 22:23:55 UTC by Tomas09 ♦55 |
| 174701263 (Comments: 2) | Sandonin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et merci pour la reprise, le point m'avait échappé. commented 2025-11-18 22:22:10 UTC by Sandonin ♦1 |
| 174498158 (Comments: 1) | jaap de vries (Discussed changesets: 134) | Waarvoor zijn hier allemaal parkeervlakken verwijderd op de Reinaldstraat? Ik snap dat iedereen anders zou mappen maar dan is het verwijderen van iemand anders hun precisiewerk toch niet nodig? commented 2025-11-18 22:20:36 UTC by Tomas09 ♦55 |
| 174817748 (Comments: 4) | saunter (Discussed changesets: 53) | For regular merchants/business in a seperate building I agree and try to fill with what I can find out, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses says there's no need to addresses when building has one and it's usually like that wit... commented 2025-11-18 22:18:36 UTC by saunter ♦16 |
| 169655598 (Comments: 2) | jaap de vries (Discussed changesets: 134) | (misschien is wat ik hiermee bedoel een beetje onduidelijk omdat ik met vrienden zo praat die het dan snappen) Wat ik bedoel is om te vragen waarvoor u zo vaak mijn correct gemappede dingen verwijderd? Er is helemaal niks mis met wat ik heb gedaan. (... commented 2025-11-18 22:15:34 UTC by Tomas09 ♦55 |
| 171965246 (Comments: 4) | divaddivag (Discussed changesets: 28) | J'ai essayé sans succès de trouver des "preuves" de la disparition de l'itinéraire, mais c'est mission impossible. Ceci dit il n'est plus mentionné nulle part, donc ça fait un bon faisc... commented 2025-11-18 22:11:54 UTC by StC ♦372 |
| 174828125 (Comments: 3) | atticquilt (Discussed changesets: 6) | Noted, thanks. commented 2025-11-18 21:57:48 UTC by atticquilt ♦8 |
| 174801947 (Comments: 1) | Levi A (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you redraw this house? The outline should match the roof line. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174801947 commented 2025-11-18 21:53:16 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174832625 (Comments: 1) | nonameyet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hiya, thanks for the note. Sounds like you know more about the site than my guess from the aerial imagery, so please feel free to amend the tagging to be more appropriate. :) If a suitable tag isn’t already documented on the wiki (see things li... commented 2025-11-18 21:51:38 UTC by gurglypipe ♦950 |
| 174833499 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26MS (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names, just tag it properly as you did with building=house --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833499 commented 2025-11-18 21:51:12 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174833838 (Comments: 1) | Hannah Rash (Discussed changesets: 2) | This looks like a duplicate park and someone has removed your version already. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833838 commented 2025-11-18 21:49:33 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174833644 (Comments: 1) | Hannah Rash (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM because software can have a difficult time with abbreviation. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833644 commented 2025-11-18 21:48:06 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174833931 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26GwenG (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: You shouldn't add any personal infomation when editing, though this isn't bad --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833931 commented 2025-11-18 21:46:12 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 164005200 (Comments: 2) | Mike Lehmann (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1370713542 je m'étonne de la présence d'un escalator dans la forêt. qu'as-tu voulu renseigner ? Salutations, Marc commented 2025-11-18 21:44:06 UTC by Marc_ch ♦288 |
| 174789188 (Comments: 1) | MSHS2026Thayne (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174789188 commented 2025-11-18 21:42:29 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174827930 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26LED (Discussed changesets: 4) | You might want to draw the outline of the building --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174827930 commented 2025-11-18 21:40:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174827450 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26LED (Discussed changesets: 4) | I don't think natural=grasslands is appropriate. It is more for natural areas of wild grass. You might want landuse=grass --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174827450 ... commented 2025-11-18 21:39:51 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174794284 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26LED (Discussed changesets: 4) | #TIP: A node with the same tag as the building isn't needed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174794284 commented 2025-11-18 21:38:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174786344 (Comments: 1) | MSHS26LED (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please check the spelling of the building name --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174786344 commented 2025-11-18 21:36:28 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174833948 (Comments: 1) | OrchidA (Discussed changesets: 5) | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-10-20 commented 2025-11-18 21:25:32 UTC by OrchidA ♦5 |
| 174695511 (Comments: 5) | Agent K01 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Got it, pretty sure I got it <2-3 meters of accurate based off the description. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695511 commented 2025-11-18 21:24:07 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 174709398 (Comments: 3) | Nicholas_II (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it, moved the camera to the pole location visible on Esri imagery. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174709398 commented 2025-11-18 21:22:36 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 173292307 (Comments: 2) | Britzz (Discussed changesets: 54) | oui, c'est la réalité, il y a maintenant un trottoir qui sépare les chaussées, il n'y a plus de passage de voitures possible commented 2025-11-18 21:06:48 UTC by Britzz ♦243 |
| 123444704 (Comments: 8) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Jj, to úplne stačí, ak na bode bude žiadne alebo správne crossing:island=* :) commented 2025-11-18 21:03:04 UTC by Tomas_J ♦312 |
| 174706211 (Comments: 3) | GeoMH (Discussed changesets: 3) | Schon klar, bei der Zahl muss mer aber lachen! (Hab's auf 15. gesetzt). Bis die Tage! Andreas commented 2025-11-18 21:01:22 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦134 |
| 174831994 (Comments: 1) | Hanss81 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Hans Wanneer access=no is getagd hoef je geen foot=no bij te taggen. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-18 20:40:42 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174823168 (Comments: 1) | FubFubFub (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-11-18 20:37:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174755536 (Comments: 2) | MarkVB123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have no clue how these 'changes' were part of a change set. I was working to add Flock LPR cameras to the map and had no intention of changing and road segments. I' not sure how to proceed forward to correct this unintended change ... commented 2025-11-18 20:36:04 UTC by MarkVB123 ♦1 |
| 174826221 (Comments: 1) | Villaggio Bitcoin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-11-18 20:30:20 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 163812611 (Comments: 4) | _zalle_ (Discussed changesets: 20) | erledigt! commented 2025-11-18 20:27:12 UTC by _zalle_ ♦24 |
| 174830695 (Comments: 1) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 41) | *Imagery used was Esri Clarity, not SPW most recent commented 2025-11-18 20:04:56 UTC by Sharko_J ♦95 |
| 174754173 (Comments: 1) | ggroro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, yanlış düzeltmeden kastınız nedir? Kullanmış olduğunuz hava görüntüsü (Bing Maps) belirtilen bölgede çok tutarlı değil. Esri hava görüntüsünü kullanırsanız daha doğru ... commented 2025-11-18 19:55:46 UTC by keyyushi ♦13 |
| 151458069 (Comments: 2) | Marc Mongenet (Discussed changesets: 22) | Je ne sais pas. Cordialement, Marc commented 2025-11-18 19:45:28 UTC by Marc Mongenet ♦26 |
| 174790112 (Comments: 2) | FiveWho (Discussed changesets: 8) | Da, malo sam istražio oko tagovanja... ovde su posebne mahale iliti zaseoci onda bi trebalo da ide posebno za npr.: - Čvor: place=hamlet name=Ćosinci name:sr=Ћосинци int_name=Cosinci - Površinu: landuse=resid... commented 2025-11-18 19:42:39 UTC by FiveWho ♦7 |
| 174687645 (Comments: 3) | Kululu (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für den Link! Die Argumente haben mir sehr geholfen, dann lassen wir es so :) commented 2025-11-18 19:41:06 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,951 |
| 174588819 (Comments: 11) | Nati_DPD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Niestety ostatnio strona budynki nie pokazuje nowych adresów do pobrania. Na upartego można by na piechotę dodać parę adresów w oparciu na tych twoich błędnych ale to i tak dłubanie nie mówiąc o pozostałych wcześnie... commented 2025-11-18 19:41:05 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦571 |
| 174686766 (Comments: 3) | Kululu (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke dir! commented 2025-11-18 19:39:55 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,951 |
| 174820053 (Comments: 3) | Ben Dezar (Discussed changesets: 7) | A no to cofam w takim razie :) Dodatkowy węzeł wejścia zmylił :P commented 2025-11-18 19:36:28 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,178 |
| 174805046 (Comments: 1) | Jordan Moldow (Discussed changesets: 11) | When a business has moved out, it's better to just remove the tags that are no longer applicable, instead of deleting the node entirely, so that useful information like the address doesn't have to be re-added. The web editor iD has a shortc... commented 2025-11-18 19:32:30 UTC by impiaaa ♦447 |
| 174817480 (Comments: 1) | snakedq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please remember to save your edits in one area before moving to another, to make your changes easier to review. Also, try to be more specific about what you changed and why—for example, "Add crossing ways and remove crossing tags where the... commented 2025-11-18 19:30:30 UTC by impiaaa ♦447 |
| 174793337 (Comments: 3) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 170) | no włąsnie, każde rondo ma uchwalona nazwę dla obszaru, a nie punktu. Owszem mało prawdopodobne, że akurat trawnik jest tym obszarem xD Ale jest to jakies uproszczenie i lepiej pozwala wpisac nazwę w konkretny obszar niz gdyby to był punkt... commented 2025-11-18 19:21:41 UTC by Yog Sot ♦358 |
| 158870416 (Comments: 2) | vmicho (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hi. Yeah that's right, fixed ;) commented 2025-11-18 19:18:28 UTC by vmicho ♦83 |
| 144578652 (Comments: 2) | WolfgangKeller (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Ciclista, wir sind am letzten Wochenende kurz in Seligenstadt vorbeigefahren. Wenn man die erste Einfahrt von der St 2260 kommend reinfährt, steht dort gleich am Anfang ein uraltes Straßenschild mit "Am Bahnhof". Dagegen... commented 2025-11-18 19:02:32 UTC by WolfgangKeller ♦4 |
| 174827562 (Comments: 1) | Jarek 🚲 (Discussed changesets: 112) | oops, sorry for the large bounding box, i didn't notice i also dragged the one node in Oakville commented 2025-11-18 19:02:32 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦334 |
| 174101381 (Comments: 2) | Cavokld (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, merci du signalement (en ce moment Osmose ne signale plus les erreurs pour les Boites aux lettres). Utilisant JOSM, j'ai un preset pour les boites aux lettres où je dois renseigner les collection_times et aussi la réf. Mai... commented 2025-11-18 18:52:17 UTC by Cavokld ♦4 |
| 174808966 (Comments: 5) | Ben Dezar (Discussed changesets: 7) | OK. Doczytałem jeszcze, że biuro jednak mają przy Mszczonowskiej w Jankach. Zatem można je wogóle skasować, bo tutaj jest tylko studio nagrywek na YT. commented 2025-11-18 18:49:59 UTC by Ben Dezar ♦5 |
| 174777998 (Comments: 2) | HJGroenVRFR (Discussed changesets: 37) | Goede avond. ik snap hem ik kijk vaaks even hoe het beste is geplaatst ten opzichte van de toegang tot het object. maakt het geen verschil laat ik hem netjes staan. commented 2025-11-18 18:36:53 UTC by HJGroenVRFR ♦23 |
| 174791594 (Comments: 3) | Pistouf (Discussed changesets: 17) | Merci pour le lien vers Facebook qui confirme la fermeture, je viens modifier. À la base je pensais juste ajouter le SIRET pour qu'il soit pris en compte par le site Complète Tes Commerces (https://complete-tes-commerces.fr/... commented 2025-11-18 18:36:14 UTC by Syl ♦1,009 |
| 174562195 (Comments: 8) | Il Bravo tecnico Mario (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, non sono riuscito a trovare la modifica alla descrizione, quindi per ora l’ho rimossa. Il tuo annuncio è ancora disponibile qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13299676228 Se vuoi, puoi aggiungere una nuova descr... commented 2025-11-18 18:10:46 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 123989117 (Comments: 9) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 58) | Got it, thx for the info! :) will then remove those buildings which definitely look like there is nothing there commented 2025-11-18 17:59:08 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦353 |
| 174824876 (Comments: 1) | MiMoHo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, MiMoHo, This is another friendly attempt to reach you. I would like to request that you would please abstain from changing the addresses of places and buildings in our city. In an earlier changeset comment, I warned you ag... commented 2025-11-18 17:54:16 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 172631152 (Comments: 1) | c-the-world (Discussed changesets: 4) | Address of these POIs is not "Omladinskih brigada 88". Can you please double check it? Best regards commented 2025-11-18 17:52:00 UTC by Smajser ♦7 |
| 174821761 (Comments: 1) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 76) | w zasadzie to bardziej te linie przypominają już próg zwalniający, nie wiem kto to wymyślił, ale mam nadzieję że szybko zostaną zdjęte. dzięki za edycje! commented 2025-11-18 17:44:30 UTC by stasiu512 ♦196 |
| 174642847 (Comments: 1) | clarquier40 (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour concernant cet ensemble de changements ("changeset"), une remarque : il vaudrait mieux éviter de supprimer un bâtiment (building=yes) pour le recréer en building=house (par exemple). Il est plutôt rec... commented 2025-11-18 17:42:32 UTC by Patchanka ♦412 |
| 174825325 (Comments: 1) | aaloo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey I was not trying to change the current Barbosa for a new one(Nectar) Both are in same venue commented 2025-11-18 17:37:17 UTC by aaloo ♦1 |
| 174815226 (Comments: 1) | st1TKvTFu2wdIbU6lqCp (Discussed changesets: 4) | use_sidepath ist vollkommen korrekt. Bitte keine use_sidepath in no ändern. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174815226 commented 2025-11-18 17:18:57 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,432 |
| 174822581 (Comments: 1) | Mamutinka (Discussed changesets: 97) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2457135706... commented 2025-11-18 17:14:19 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 174823907 (Comments: 1) | MiMoHo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, MiMoHo, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for adding more details about places you visit. But please make sure to never type addresses on them. In this changeset, you added "Rue de Flandre" as addr:street for one place, and i... commented 2025-11-18 17:08:56 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 174799389 (Comments: 2) | RAFAEL MAIA QRA NEGOCIADOR (Discussed changesets: 3) | All empty nodes have been deleted in changesets: 174824251, 174824248, 174824243, 174824238, 174824231, 174824227, 174824225, 174824224 Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18975 commented 2025-11-18 17:05:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174809136 (Comments: 7) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | C'est pas grave ! j 'ai vu que vous entiez nombreux à cartographier et c'est le plus important pour moi . belle journée à vous . commented 2025-11-18 16:57:44 UTC by eurelien ♦7 |
| 174822122 (Comments: 1) | LandenWaverlyMapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174823427 commented 2025-11-18 16:43:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,504 |
| 174822355 (Comments: 1) | Ohiowaverlycityschoolsplzmakememodandorexecution (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-11-18 16:27:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174821692 (Comments: 1) | Tbr78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das sieht gut aus, ich habe keine Anmerkungen. Bei Fragen bitte melden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-11-18 16:26:09 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174768062 (Comments: 3) | FFW Ballendorf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, das sieht gut aus. Das Wiki ist leider auch an ein paar Stellen nicht so wirklich gut geschrieben. Bei "normalen" Hydranten lässt man das fire_hydrant:style einfach weg, das ist nur für besondere Merkmale. Viele Gr... commented 2025-11-18 16:24:09 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174575732 (Comments: 11) | WP71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | That's the one. Is there a way to pass photos/imagery on here, for verification? Is there an open map feature I'm missing? commented 2025-11-18 16:23:31 UTC by WP71 ♦1 |
| 171105354 (Comments: 1) | pfostendww (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin aus WIldeshausen! Ich habe hier gerade das bicycle=no zu yes gemacht: https://www.osm.org/way/175489520 Ein bicycle=no bitte nur setzen, wo ein Verbotsschild (VZ DE:254) steht. Wenn am Nebenweg ein Gehweg+Radverkehr frei ist, dann ist Radf... commented 2025-11-18 16:19:47 UTC by GerdP ♦2,789 |
| 174442844 (Comments: 2) | Wizard_Sleeves144 (Discussed changesets: 1) | What's the correct location for this camera? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174442844 commented 2025-11-18 16:17:22 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 174695534 (Comments: 3) | Agent K01 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I moved it using the Id editor to the pole WSW of the original location. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695534 commented 2025-11-18 16:13:27 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 160086129 (Comments: 6) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 23) | Bon du coup j'ai ajouté name:etymology=https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/couar pour éviter de reproduire le problème plus tard. Je n'ai pas envoyé vers la page wikidata :) commented 2025-11-18 16:03:10 UTC by K12230LF ♦30 |
| 174821762 (Comments: 1) | wolfy1339 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverts the following: 174801135 174801294 174801435 174801799 174817344 174820558 174820445 174820393 174818969 174818737 174817798 174817725 174817628 174817579 174817431 commented 2025-11-18 15:54:23 UTC by wolfy1339 ♦37 |
| 174821407 (Comments: 1) | Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Hetis.. Dit is helaas niet correct. Er is een adresnode. Ik heb het adres weer verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-18 15:52:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 172550757 (Comments: 1) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 23) | Carrefour Express w Rondo 1 był supermarketem, a nie sklepem convenience. commented 2025-11-18 15:45:28 UTC by Rogoyski ♦237 |
| 173203169 (Comments: 4) | Erelen (Discussed changesets: 23) | 👍 commented 2025-11-18 15:43:52 UTC by Erelen ♦81 |
| 174820034 (Comments: 9) | rdhert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maar even gespiket naar de straatnaamborden... Het zal Elandweide zijn.. Je zou dan dus een bericht naar Verbeter de kaart kunnen sturen (terugmelding) dat de BGT niet klopt. commented 2025-11-18 15:38:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174777411 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 68) | Excellent find. I didn't know about this tag before. "Data consumers dont understand it"? dont care; OSM schema is always evolving, they will have to understand this eventually. commented 2025-11-18 15:36:16 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦63 |
| 174820771 (Comments: 2) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 363) | Klopt en daar had ik dus niets aan veranderd. Dat kun je dus aanpassen. De Antilopeweide heb ik al gesplitst. Maar dit is dus niet het stukje waar het eerst over ging. commented 2025-11-18 15:29:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174788518 (Comments: 4) | donux-nl (Discussed changesets: 40) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2821193250 Een transformatorhuisje heeft geen postcode.. commented 2025-11-18 15:18:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174775632 (Comments: 2) | kyle36 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Eggie, goed om te weten, ik zal het forum checken in het vervolg! commented 2025-11-18 15:16:05 UTC by kyle36 ♦1 |
| 174815028 (Comments: 3) | Cyniox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Eggie, De bron klopt wel, maar die is nu niet correct overgenomen. De nummers 15 tot en met 27 (tegen de bovenkant van het vierkant) zijn allemaal Elandweide. Het stukje straat links zitten geen huizen aan, en op de bron die je met net stuu... commented 2025-11-18 15:15:43 UTC by Cyniox ♦1 |
| 174788696 (Comments: 5) | donux-nl (Discussed changesets: 40) | Volgens mij is dat pad langs de woningen geen footway maar een highway=path en mag je er dus ook fietsen. highway=path surface=paving_stones bicycle-yes en foot=yes Er staat geen G7 bord MVG eggie commented 2025-11-18 15:15:42 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174778202 (Comments: 1) | HJS_Holten (Discussed changesets: 22) | Dag HJS Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt mij allemaal oke zo. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-18 15:03:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174583169 (Comments: 2) | ezekielf (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi. Yes although in theory a data consumer could hopefully obtain the street name for a sidewalk from the nearest highway, so far they have not done so. As a result there is a movement to add `name=*` to sidewalks. `street:name=*` is an alternative... commented 2025-11-18 15:01:08 UTC by ezekielf ♦87 |
| 174815662 (Comments: 4) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 441) | Merci pour l'information, on va remonter cela auprès de nos développeurs pour trouver une solution Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-11-18 14:59:09 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦266 |
| 171758168 (Comments: 4) | george1201 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Ich hab's nochmal vor Ort überprüft: Du hattest recht, es ist living_street. Durch den dortigen vielfachen Wechsel der verschiedenen Zonen bin ich wohl damals etwas durcheinander gekommen. Jetzt scheint es zu passen. Ich konnte hier un... commented 2025-11-18 14:53:01 UTC by george1201 ♦242 |
| 174793442 (Comments: 1) | Rwags (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera appears to be in the trees with no street vantage based on how it lines up on Esri imagery. What's the correct position? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1747934... commented 2025-11-18 14:51:22 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,236 |
| 172098699 (Comments: 4) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bohuzial, nepoznam to tam, dostanem sa do tej casti len obcas v lete na bicykli, takze dovtedy to bude musiet pockat, ak sa toho nechyti niekto iny. :) commented 2025-11-18 14:50:14 UTC by ticho2 ♦24 |
| 174811890 (Comments: 4) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour eurelien, Je suis désolé de vous embêter mais le champ phone n'est toujours pas bon et a priori, comme le fait remarquer trial, ce n'est pas addr:housenumber=02 mais addr:housenumber=2 commented 2025-11-18 14:46:06 UTC by K12230LF ♦30 |
| 174818952 (Comments: 1) | Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Het... ............ Ik heb de adresnode verwijderd. Dit adres bestaat niet als zodanig.. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Helftheuvelpassage+13&objectId=0796010000366402&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x... commented 2025-11-18 14:42:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 169074963 (Comments: 3) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 23) | C'est fait :) commented 2025-11-18 14:42:15 UTC by K12230LF ♦30 |
| 174806823 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 441) | Bonjour, Merci pour l'alerte, effectivement la géolocalisation n'était pas bonne, nous avons fait la correction nécessaire. En revanche, il s'agit bien d'un fabricant aussi bien de portes de garage ou de... commented 2025-11-18 14:39:42 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦266 |
| 174818307 (Comments: 2) | Nordkappp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, merci pour l'info, je ne connaissais pas le préfixe. En l’occurrence ça ne me semble pas adapté car il ne s'agit pas d'un commerce mais de bureaux, et peu de risque qu'il ne réapparaisse. Mais... commented 2025-11-18 14:39:04 UTC by Nordkappp ♦1 |
| 174816447 (Comments: 1) | VRU_JeroenS (Discussed changesets: 9) | Beste Jeroen.. Dat is dus niet correct. Het is geen straatnaam. Gebruik evt description, maar zelfs dat is niet nodig. Het is al getagd als emergency_access MVG eggie commented 2025-11-18 14:37:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 173933392 (Comments: 1) | wanderzen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, sur ce changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173933392 tu as déplacé vraisemblablement par erreur un node et la communauté bordelaise se fait chambrer ... https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/qui-est-motiv... commented 2025-11-18 14:35:32 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,278 |
| 77568453 (Comments: 1) | wanderzen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, attention le name n'est pas là pour définir l'arbre et il est préférable dans la description d'un changeset de décrire ce que vous avez fait, pas le cadre dans lequel vous le faites... commented 2025-11-18 14:33:59 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,278 |
| 174816391 (Comments: 2) | VRU_JeroenS (Discussed changesets: 9) | Als bovenstaand aangepast.. name = heb ik veranderd in description commented 2025-11-18 14:33:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174806784 (Comments: 2) | roubaf (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ah mince il faut que je retourne voir. Je m'en occupe. commented 2025-11-18 14:31:17 UTC by roubaf ♦13 |
| 174787454 (Comments: 1) | kpedido (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please check your tags. There are no keys like "vending4" in other places. Please check the wiki for the correct tags. commented 2025-11-18 14:20:02 UTC by mueschel ♦6,730 |
| 174485068 (Comments: 3) | 500370719 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818395 commented 2025-11-18 14:17:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174488458 (Comments: 3) | Benson & Bingham Reno (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818380 commented 2025-11-18 14:16:38 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174505529 (Comments: 3) | Redefinedhi (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818365 commented 2025-11-18 14:16:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174818022 (Comments: 1) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 63) | tagowaniu* :D commented 2025-11-18 14:15:21 UTC by stasiu512 ♦196 |
| 174520559 (Comments: 3) | Pancheros Mexican Grill (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818320 commented 2025-11-18 14:15:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174531307 (Comments: 5) | trinityink (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174531830 commented 2025-11-18 14:14:45 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174542667 (Comments: 3) | scandihoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818290 commented 2025-11-18 14:13:58 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174542805 (Comments: 3) | Anahi Dominicci (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174544675 commented 2025-11-18 14:13:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174548771 (Comments: 3) | affordablemaids (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174593305 commented 2025-11-18 14:12:54 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174550112 (Comments: 3) | Functionalmp (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818229 commented 2025-11-18 14:12:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174551279 (Comments: 3) | herbiohealth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174573031 commented 2025-11-18 14:12:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 170746789 (Comments: 1) | ha5vsa (Discussed changesets: 8) | Szia! Ha közutakat darabolsz, ne feledd el az új vonalakat is felvenni azokba a kapcsolatokba, amikben az eredeti út benne volt! Köszönöm: Ákos commented 2025-11-18 14:11:56 UTC by ITineris ♦395 |
| 174576776 (Comments: 3) | Art Leaders Gallery & Custom Framing (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818186 commented 2025-11-18 14:10:57 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174577357 (Comments: 3) | 500367226 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818164 commented 2025-11-18 14:10:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174577457 (Comments: 3) | Wild Card and Co (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818149 commented 2025-11-18 14:09:50 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 147618500 (Comments: 1) | SirKillian (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/51232764/history/8 you specify that the crossing is uncontrolled, meaning no traffic signal and in the same time you added the traffic signal https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/249697690 Regards, ... commented 2025-11-18 14:09:34 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,308 |
| 174577545 (Comments: 3) | Amazing Floors LP (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818136 commented 2025-11-18 14:09:33 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174580650 (Comments: 4) | rayvaks (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174580810 commented 2025-11-18 14:08:57 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174583208 (Comments: 5) | Diamantino Marketing (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174583384 commented 2025-11-18 14:08:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 144480018 (Comments: 14) | ReinerMeyer (Discussed changesets: 89) | Danke für die Diskussion. Ich habe auch dabei wieder was neues gelernt. commented 2025-11-18 14:07:20 UTC by ReinerMeyer ♦45 |
| 174587267 (Comments: 3) | iWork Spaces of Alex City - Affordable Coworking Space for lease (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174644356 commented 2025-11-18 14:07:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174587649 (Comments: 3) | The Lodge Retirement Community (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818026 commented 2025-11-18 14:06:38 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174589518 (Comments: 3) | James T Hillian Jr (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818009 commented 2025-11-18 14:06:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174589854 (Comments: 3) | parsuser (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174590159 commented 2025-11-18 14:05:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174594029 (Comments: 3) | affordablemaids (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174603998 commented 2025-11-18 14:04:34 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174599955 (Comments: 3) | Point Loma Estate Planning Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174635728 commented 2025-11-18 14:04:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174630176 (Comments: 3) | 플라스틱성형외과 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174630343 commented 2025-11-18 14:03:50 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174631971 (Comments: 3) | cornellforge (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174635867 commented 2025-11-18 14:02:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174633150 (Comments: 4) | wololaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174635782 commented 2025-11-18 14:02:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174635671 (Comments: 5) | اعلانات العرب (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817873 commented 2025-11-18 14:01:51 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174817848 (Comments: 1) | ottwiz (Discussed changesets: 287) | Amúgy igen tényleg úgy van kiírva hogy Gyömölcs, nem elírás. commented 2025-11-18 14:01:41 UTC by ottwiz ♦392 |
| 174640748 (Comments: 3) | North Greenville Self Storage (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817853 commented 2025-11-18 14:01:01 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174640989 (Comments: 3) | Clutch Industries (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174645261 commented 2025-11-18 14:00:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174650122 (Comments: 3) | 500370692 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817828 commented 2025-11-18 14:00:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
 | 174650986 (Comments: 4) | Abelardo Costa (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817815 commented 2025-11-18 13:59:52 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174656949 (Comments: 1) | Fowler High Precision2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174817792 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-11-18 13:58:49 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174656852 (Comments: 3) | Fowler High Precision2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174817784 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-11-18 13:58:25 UTC by NeisRevert ♦357 |
| 174659666 (Comments: 4) | repairNstore iPhone Reparatur und Handy Reparatur Bern (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174780860 commented 2025-11-18 13:57:42 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174668265 (Comments: 3) | 500370327 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817724 commented 2025-11-18 13:56:37 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174672517 (Comments: 4) | InnFarma (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817706 commented 2025-11-18 13:56:00 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174685284 (Comments: 3) | Precious Smiles Family Dentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817676 commented 2025-11-18 13:55:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174444190 (Comments: 3) | worklinks (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174444641 commented 2025-11-18 13:54:48 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174444811 (Comments: 3) | Eda Mucaj Psychotherapy (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174444971 commented 2025-11-18 13:52:43 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174446901 (Comments: 3) | southcoastfertility (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817570 commented 2025-11-18 13:52:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174446952 (Comments: 3) | Preventive Pest Control Las Vegas (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174448531 commented 2025-11-18 13:51:37 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174470983 (Comments: 3) | 500370241 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817540 commented 2025-11-18 13:51:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174480719 (Comments: 3) | Eagle Movers NZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174626569 commented 2025-11-18 13:50:47 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174482265 (Comments: 3) | 500367476 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817511 commented 2025-11-18 13:50:17 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174483096 (Comments: 3) | 500369486 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817494 commented 2025-11-18 13:49:38 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174483868 (Comments: 3) | 500320892 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817475 commented 2025-11-18 13:48:50 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,470 |
| 174779112 (Comments: 3) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 441) | Bonjour, merci pour cette précision. J'ai remis les informations précédentes que j'avais enlevé, en précisant avec une description et dans les horaires la fermeture temporaire. Je vous laisserais ch... commented 2025-11-18 13:43:00 UTC by Syl ♦1,009 |
| 174778897 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 441) | Bonjour, Notre client avait modifié le nom, nous venons de le corriger Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-11-18 13:31:35 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦266 |
| 172613692 (Comments: 3) | Ardennen8 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Bon, volgens de experts is voltage=0 een slecht idee. De redenering is dat je op terrein maar moeilijk kan weten hoeveel volt er werkelijk is - behalve wat genoteerd staat op de bordjes en op basis van de dikte van de kabels en isolatoren. De lijn op... commented 2025-11-18 13:26:41 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,382 |
| 174799498 (Comments: 2) | teguh suprianto (Discussed changesets: 3) | Have been corrected by osm.org/changeset/174802269 commented 2025-11-18 13:24:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174799483 (Comments: 2) | teguh suprianto (Discussed changesets: 3) | Have been corrected by osm.org/changeset/174802269 commented 2025-11-18 13:24:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174766315 (Comments: 2) | teguh suprianto (Discussed changesets: 3) | Have been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174802269 commented 2025-11-18 13:23:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,690 |
| 174659438 (Comments: 5) | repairNstore iPhone Reparatur und Handy Reparatur Bern (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Wie kann ich das alle so einstellen oder wie Sie sagen Alles einheitlich zu integrieren würden Sie mir dabei helfen. Viele Grüsse commented 2025-11-18 13:23:26 UTC by repairNstore iPhone Reparatur und Handy Reparatur Bern ♦1 |
| 172305973 (Comments: 1) | NikEdGib (Discussed changesets: 178) | Не удаляйте всё подряд. Вы поудалили границы города и района commented 2025-11-18 13:18:46 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,175 |
| 174816065 (Comments: 1) | SeanSam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 66 potential crossin... commented 2025-11-18 13:15:26 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174814288 (Comments: 1) | İl_Cattivo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 13 potential crossin... commented 2025-11-18 13:15:18 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 172913204 (Comments: 6) | Matmat-25 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Oui oneway:bicycle=no Je suis bien d'accord commented 2025-11-18 13:15:16 UTC by Julien39 ♦40 |
| 174815574 (Comments: 1) | Oleksandr A (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, adressepunkterne i OSM bliver automatisk opdateret fra Danmarks Adresser. Hvis din ændring skal være permanent, er du nødt til at informere Vesthimmerlands Kommune om fejlen. Det er kommunen som placerer punkterne. commented 2025-11-18 13:05:37 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,723 |
| 174765075 (Comments: 1) | dwbz-nm (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ist dieser Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451320292 wirklich unclassified? Auf den Luftbildern erkennt man am Südende eine Treppe, oder wurde das kürzlich geändert? commented 2025-11-18 13:05:27 UTC by cuzi ♦132 |
| 173646888 (Comments: 8) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 27) | a, najwyraźniej tak: widać na zdjęciu commented 2025-11-18 12:51:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 165251890 (Comments: 9) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 68) | Upon review, indeed, On Luen Village is not *that* populated to be even a `=hamlet`, and so was demoted to just `=isolated_dwelling`; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174815393 commented 2025-11-18 12:46:58 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦63 |
| 173614017 (Comments: 2) | sadzona1902 (Discussed changesets: 1) | patrzyłem na inne miasta (warszawę) i nie mają wpisanych, więc się wstrzymałem z tym, ale może warto jednak dodać? commented 2025-11-18 12:40:30 UTC by sadzona1902 ♦1 |
| 174621851 (Comments: 4) | GinaroZ (Discussed changesets: 56) | Ah! So that explains those odd forest cut lines that don't have any power lines/pylons through them, neat. Mayhaps I'll double check the pipeline markers I've seen and look for patterns. So much data to pore through 😁 commented 2025-11-18 12:39:53 UTC by ExoMal ♦39 |
| 174808374 (Comments: 2) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | oui bien ! l'accueil du gofl n'a connaissance de rien . Mais comme il y a la crèche , peut être que des parents viennent en vélo . commented 2025-11-18 12:35:32 UTC by eurelien ♦7 |
| 170686593 (Comments: 1) | noenoenoe123 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, c'est bien, mais vous ne semblez pas avoir tout corrigé : brand=Géant Casino brand:wikidata=Q1380537 commented 2025-11-18 12:22:26 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 174771907 (Comments: 1) | ぴーまんまん (Discussed changesets: 1) | こんにちは初めまして Openstreetmapの編集は仮想空間ではなく現実空間の図面データを直接扱います。 現地には無い、仮想の海を造る行為は、荒らしととられますので注意してくださ... commented 2025-11-18 12:19:31 UTC by Ryo-a ♦3 |
| 174270352 (Comments: 1) | Legendary Lim (Discussed changesets: 8) | The Bukit chagar is not operational station yet, should put it as construction station not railway station commented 2025-11-18 12:19:30 UTC by angys ♦384 |
| 174771752 (Comments: 3) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 28) | думаю, проблема в том, что на основном ходе у нас прописана макс скорость 80, а на дублере - ничего. Вот он и тянет туда, думая что там по умол... commented 2025-11-18 11:50:26 UTC by literan ♦6,878 |
| 173947714 (Comments: 1) | s777n (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello. About your notes path or track. Measure the width of a trace with the 'building=building (round) and read the measurement on the botton. Smaller than 3 mtr = path wider =unclassified. The through going traces don't mee... commented 2025-11-18 11:34:10 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
 | 174804712 (Comments: 2) | Tomas Straupis (Discussed changesets: 82) | iD įspėjimai nelabai kam įdomūs, nes jo įspėjimų didžioji dalis yra nesąmonės ir čia vienas pagrindinių (bet ne vienintelis) trūkumų. natural=water yra viena klasė objektų (kurie nelabai mąstančių žmonių buvo suplakti į vieną b... commented 2025-11-18 10:56:05 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,999 |
| 174704947 (Comments: 2) | baprischka (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ciao, parli di https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/601628029? L’ho seguito ma arrivato alla strada non c’è un collegamento, praticamente devi saltare un muretto per ritrovarti sulla strada principale. Secondo me si tratta di un error... commented 2025-11-18 10:50:00 UTC by baprischka ♦34 |
| 174799582 (Comments: 3) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 5) | `=locality` is for unspecified, uninhabited, and non-addressing locations. Ta Kwu Ling is obviously used to refer to the estates commonly. commented 2025-11-18 10:47:43 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,658 |
| 174705150 (Comments: 3) | baprischka (Discussed changesets: 15) | Fatto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174811573 commented 2025-11-18 10:42:44 UTC by baprischka ♦34 |
| 174807670 (Comments: 1) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour, pourquoi avoir supprimé amenity=school de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342902571 ? Le tag était bien présent et il est documenté comme tel dans la documentation : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR... commented 2025-11-18 10:01:51 UTC by K12230LF ♦30 |
| 174805100 (Comments: 3) | JosTheFarmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wing hotel was rebranded to Koko hotel commented 2025-11-18 09:57:56 UTC by JosTheFarmer ♦1 |
| 174627177 (Comments: 4) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 285) | Niestety podczas poruszania się tam nie zwróciłem uwagi, czy nazwa przystanku mogła ulec zmianie. Nie zwróciłem też uwagi na więcej błędów w zmianie tego obiektu w ośrodek dla imigrantów. Tak czy siak, w takim bie... commented 2025-11-18 09:49:53 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
| 174619168 (Comments: 1) | AroufNonOfficiel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Pourquoi avoir passé l'axe Saint-Cyprien-Lardenne en secondary ? Quelles sont les soources / Quelle est la logique ? Cordialement commented 2025-11-18 09:47:33 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦43 |
| 161741103 (Comments: 2) | Eyal Faran (Discussed changesets: 1) | שוחזר https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174809450 commented 2025-11-18 09:46:41 UTC by hatul ♦420 |
| 174809306 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 113) | Nie wiem, po co landuse miał ustawiony foot=yes. commented 2025-11-18 09:42:54 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦289 |
| 174190096 (Comments: 2) | LiudmilaBareika (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ScrawnyMeowth1! Thanks a lot for catching that and the fix. I really appreciate your helpful feedback. Best regards, Liudmila. commented 2025-11-18 09:33:58 UTC by LiudmilaBareika ♦1 |
| 174808080 (Comments: 1) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, plutôt que Tabacologue en name et office=soins qui n'existe pas dans le wiki, je mettrai : healthcare=counselling healthcare:counselling=addiction note=Tabacologue La doc en parlant est ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-11-18 09:33:52 UTC by K12230LF ♦30 |
| 174259613 (Comments: 1) | ANProctor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hot tip - after outlining a building and assigning detached house preset you can 'square' the corners of the building with the Q key. Many, many buildings have square corners. Cheers commented 2025-11-18 09:15:58 UTC by tastrax ♦1,177 |
| 98968027 (Comments: 4) | rayleigh1 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Sporo tych adresów w szczerym polu się renderuje. Np. przy ,,ulicy'' Sosnowej, która fizycznie została ,,zaorana'', z obu stron wstawiono bramy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249473428 commented 2025-11-18 09:04:39 UTC by VA00 ♦616 |
| 174789088 (Comments: 2) | LevanGo (Discussed changesets: 9) | "tertiary" or "unclassified", difficult to judge, which one. commented 2025-11-18 09:02:33 UTC by yelisey90 ♦199 |
| 174673710 (Comments: 1) | Havoc Gamerz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Review, OSM is a live worldwide data bank therefore it relies on mappers contributing ground truth, verifiable data. I can see that most of what you've added is highly likely to not be ground truth, it looks ... commented 2025-11-18 08:58:53 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 146137611 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 275) | Zdar, priechod Node: 11508265940 je nespravne od teba oznaceny asi crossing:island=yes. Opravim. commented 2025-11-18 08:50:14 UTC by Tomas_J ♦312 |
| 174806989 (Comments: 2) | EnisAr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Burada harita düzenleme işlemlerine dayalı bir örnek yorum vardır: "TENMAK adını yoldan kaldırdım" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed name TENMAK from way" commented 2025-11-18 08:46:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174646325 (Comments: 2) | lampek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dziękuję za pomoc i wytłumaczenie, następnym razem będę już wiedział co i jak. Pozdrawiam :) commented 2025-11-18 08:39:37 UTC by lampek ♦2 |
| 174762826 (Comments: 1) | CarrbridgeTiger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Sorry to say that you placed a new highway, Way: Boundary Way (1451310436), on top of an existing highway. This makes a duplication of highways, which could cause disruption to routing. It's OSM practice to a... commented 2025-11-18 08:34:14 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,988 |
| 174785581 (Comments: 1) | junekim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5832330137 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-11-18 08:25:55 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174792312 (Comments: 1) | Mikmak62 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. I assume this is the name of a busine... commented 2025-11-18 08:18:48 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 174777240 (Comments: 8) | thurmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://support.komoot.com/hc/en-us/articles/4605969706778-Request-Rename-waypoints commented 2025-11-18 08:15:17 UTC by thurmer ♦1 |
| 174778434 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 19) | Doplnil som chýbajúce addr:conscriptionnumber a addr:place https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174806113 commented 2025-11-18 08:13:48 UTC by Dodko ♦1,268 |
| 170780912 (Comments: 1) | Open Data Montpellier Méditerranée Métropole (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13086967765 Il y a une incohérence sur cet objet soit c'est un Washingtonia filifera et on peux supprimer le fixme, soit il y a un doute sur le taxon et dans ce cas c'est genus=Was... commented 2025-11-18 08:01:03 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,308 |
| 174787047 (Comments: 4) | TT_Roskilde (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 commented 2025-11-18 08:00:38 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,723 |
| 174758685 (Comments: 2) | Seandebasti (Discussed changesets: 106) | Yes I will later, it’s a semi detached house on two sides so four addresses and one building has 4 addresses, so I have to figure out how to map commented 2025-11-18 08:00:13 UTC by Seandebasti ♦127 |
| 174749286 (Comments: 1) | Jojolaglandouille (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, merci pour ces améliorations. cependant comme le suggère le validateur n'hésites pas à ajouter un nœud commun entre les différents cheminements comme ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/... commented 2025-11-18 07:58:00 UTC by frosm ♦1,147 |
| 174720226 (Comments: 2) | vlaristic (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zapravo, ja sam dodao "ulica" u naziv zato što po RGZ-u postoje i "Sinđelićeva ulica" i "Sinđelićeva" (paralelno jedna sa drugom. Pa se i brojevi dupliraju. Ako bi izbrisali "ulica", imali bi duple b... commented 2025-11-18 07:51:22 UTC by vlaristic ♦5 |
| 174778097 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 441) | Bonjour, Merci de votre alerte, nous avons corrigé cet erreur Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-11-18 07:49:02 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦266 |
| 174799839 (Comments: 1) | Seton1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-11-18 07:47:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 168886271 (Comments: 4) | Bernard 88 95 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour Bernard, Merci pour ton retour et tes explications. Je pense qu'il ne faut pas décrire des pistes qui n'en sont pas. Cela va peut-être résoudre le problème de rendu que tu évoques mais cela v... commented 2025-11-18 07:45:25 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,167 |
| 174694976 (Comments: 4) | MicheleExplorer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, bicycles are allowed. Thanks so much for the suggestions. I'll copy this string [ motor_vehicle:conditional= destination @ (Jun 01 - Sep 30)] and insert it into the labels. commented 2025-11-18 07:44:10 UTC by MicheleExplorer ♦1 |
| 174109252 (Comments: 1) | zaneto (Discussed changesets: 5) | "CAI 607" non va' nel tag name nè per le way nè per le ralation, ti consiglio di leggere qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking commented 2025-11-18 07:35:52 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦112 |
 | 174775453 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hola J00SECI, ¿Podrías dejar de cambiar la ubicación y las etiquetas de los elementos? ¿Qué fuente de información estás usando para validar las etiquetas estás utilizando? commented 2025-11-18 06:36:23 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦118 |
| 174775993 (Comments: 4) | Carlavissers (Discussed changesets: 6) | dank voor je feedback! commented 2025-11-18 05:50:34 UTC by Carlavissers ♦3 |
| 174768354 (Comments: 2) | ilias_ (Discussed changesets: 22) | As I said… please, no. It’s better to keep the history of a relation that has hundreds of versions and is more than 11 years old, and also to respect the work of others. Just delete the new relation you created and add the ways to the ol... commented 2025-11-18 05:22:50 UTC by ilias_ ♦344 |
| X | 173662691 (Comments: 1) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 你能解釋為何動到烏坵的邊界，尤其是為何在海上加山峰？ commented 2025-11-18 05:19:43 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,522 |
| 144915255 (Comments: 1) | The_Bradinator (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks a lot for adding these townships! commented 2025-11-18 04:49:39 UTC by Molandfreak ♦18 |
| 150625192 (Comments: 1) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thanks a lot for adding these townships! commented 2025-11-18 04:41:53 UTC by Molandfreak ♦18 |
| 173974496 (Comments: 1) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 24) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18972 commented 2025-11-18 04:30:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 173956945 (Comments: 2) | krmatthews (Discussed changesets: 3) | You're welcome. I had an eye on the traffic camera at Fir/5th and went to check it out as soon as it appeared to be open. commented 2025-11-18 04:13:46 UTC by krmatthews ♦2 |
| 174445668 (Comments: 3) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi Frank Peng, thank you for making the corrections. I will be more aware of memberships of objects within relations in my future edits. commented 2025-11-18 04:11:18 UTC by Kaduna ♦26 |
| 174798711 (Comments: 1) | Bradgrover (Discussed changesets: 9) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18971 commented 2025-11-18 03:58:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,091 |
| 174750706 (Comments: 1) | Wheatrucker74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ALPR devices aren''t typically in the middle of the road. Look for the shadow of the pole to find the base location. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174750706 ... commented 2025-11-18 03:35:37 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174181165 (Comments: 3) | Shre_WD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi 無限の刃, Thank you for your kind reminders on remote mapping and thank you for making the corrections. commented 2025-11-18 03:35:15 UTC by Shre_WD ♦3 |
| 174749190 (Comments: 1) | dbherb (Discussed changesets: 2) | I would appreciate if you could be more precise with the location of the node. Look for the shadow the pole makes to find the base location. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/17474... commented 2025-11-18 03:34:07 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174749123 (Comments: 1) | dbherb (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: The ALRP's are not typically in the middle of the street. Can you fix? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174749123 commented 2025-11-18 03:32:57 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174741112 (Comments: 1) | broadcast9031 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: We spell out street names in OSM because software has a hard time with abbreviations. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174741112 commented 2025-11-18 03:31:16 UTC by Glassman ♦5,627 |
| 174766750 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz5259 (Discussed changesets: 3) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451327574 Please don't share the nodes of the green if you have the fairway surrounding the green. If you can't see any fringe around the green, you should make the fairway butt up to the green ... commented 2025-11-18 03:26:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦761 |
| 174402016 (Comments: 3) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 5) | Admittedly I did not focus too much on the precise geometry and simplified some as I expect a natural forest's land cover to change constantly anyway so it shouldn't matter too much. Another factor was that the whole area is sparsely wooded... commented 2025-11-18 03:22:39 UTC by kingkingHK ♦31 |
| 174750572 (Comments: 1) | jdoedeere (Discussed changesets: 7) | Heads up jdoedeere, golf=hole lines need to start at the tee and end in the green. I noticed a few of yours were pointed the other way around today. I'm cleaning them up as I find them but thought you should know for future edits. Thanks. commented 2025-11-18 03:19:22 UTC by b-jazz ♦761 |
| 174782017 (Comments: 1) | Divest320 (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://osm.org/way/1451392555 When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cros... commented 2025-11-18 03:11:03 UTC by b-jazz ♦761 |
| 174788641 (Comments: 1) | MWBtfd (Discussed changesets: 4) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451431546 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines sh... commented 2025-11-18 03:08:08 UTC by b-jazz ♦761 |
| 168896312 (Comments: 2) | GrabTH_Thamolvan (Discussed changesets: 7) | reverted for conflicting classification changes and lack of response from original mapper https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174799745 commented 2025-11-18 03:07:02 UTC by julcnx ♦414 |
| 172996425 (Comments: 6) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 22) | I am referring to (3). As for the use of key:ref, I don't see any requirements that limit its use to those with signpost but I won't object to removing them if you consider it to be most suitable commented 2025-11-18 02:17:30 UTC by Cypp0847 ♦5 |
| 174784209 (Comments: 1) | AntiCompositeNumber (Discussed changesets: 10) | I don't think this is a correct use of mascot:iconography=*. While BYU does use a Y in branding and materials, they do also use an actual cougar, so mascot:iconography is not necessary. commented 2025-11-18 02:16:24 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦57 |
| 173955149 (Comments: 1) | 方恨少 (Discussed changesets: 5) | 跨过公园中部河流的新建铁路桥似乎有自身名称？需查证 commented 2025-11-18 02:00:56 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦12 |
| 174775203 (Comments: 1) | MasaneMiyaPA (Discussed changesets: 1) | 观察到公园西侧的“月亮车站”似乎还处于在建状态，需要验证 commented 2025-11-18 01:57:50 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦12 |
| 174762938 (Comments: 3) | JohnDoe202 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1.\tOpen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13310610017 2.\tGo into edit-mode 3.\tSwitch the list of tags into “text mode” 4.\tLook at the tags :-) commented 2025-11-18 01:11:26 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 167622322 (Comments: 2) | seattlefyi (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi, yes, I totally get it, have felt that same way before, and then realized that’s the dream - to have some other mapper get to it first! I’m sure I didn’t see the seed library - sounds like a great find though. Thanks for sharing ... commented 2025-11-18 00:58:51 UTC by seattlefyi ♦378 |
| 174796998 (Comments: 1) | wardj1906 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, why did you relabel some taxiways as Yellow and/or Green? I couldn't find any source for that on the ground. commented 2025-11-18 00:51:53 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦134 |
| 174736769 (Comments: 13) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 557) | and to be clear, this type of confusion would be perfectly fine and not bannable offence if these would be new people but I strongly suspect that these accounts are operated by a single person commented 2025-11-18 00:11:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
 | 174582003 (Comments: 1) | Ctrl+shiftF5 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello Ctrl+ShiftF5, I see you updated construction along this stretch of Carretera Longitudinal de la Sierra Norte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230398330,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364863025). Do you have any more information on the ... commented 2025-11-18 00:06:09 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦72 |
| 174746229 (Comments: 3) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 137) | This car park is a weird one. The underground portion has a closing time (which I can't recall right now), whereas the surface does not have a closing time. I feel that the way I had it tagged before worked as you could consider the upper and lo... commented 2025-11-17 23:34:42 UTC by MapMenMan ♦13 |
| 151512829 (Comments: 6) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 40) | Dziś tzn. wczoraj spędziłem trochę na telefonie. Wiele się nie dowiedziałem ale mam kolejne kontakty. Urzędach czy Sołtys mało co wiedzą a Stowarzyszenie Powiśle Dąbrowskie było wręcz zaskoczeniem. Prawdopodobnie w terenie traw... commented 2025-11-17 23:14:34 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦571 |
| 174795514 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 56) | The Mapillary photo shows a turn restriction without the "except buses"; I assume that was added after the photo was taken. I was still able to use Mapillary to confirm everything else about the turn restriction. commented 2025-11-17 23:11:26 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦76 |
| 174671622 (Comments: 1) | Fox! (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information. osm.org/changeset/174793965 commented 2025-11-17 22:56:40 UTC by QuiLe ♦13 |
| 174671644 (Comments: 1) | Fox! (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793... commented 2025-11-17 22:56:24 UTC by QuiLe ♦13 |
| 174794961 (Comments: 2) | rohieb (Discussed changesets: 46) | fehlende URL zu [1]: https://www.landesrecht-hamburg.de/bsha/document/jlr-NeuOCuxNDStVtrGHArahmen bzw. https://voris.wolterskluwer-online.de/browse/source/csh-da-filter%21a52e918e-8a02-41f8-8b62-1c4b6a92ff6a--WKDE_LTR_0000003520%236ec2281df2ec32f0bfb... commented 2025-11-17 22:54:08 UTC by rohieb ♦125 |
| 174743442 (Comments: 3) | alinaspiv469 (Discussed changesets: 1) | generally we do not map features that move around allot like cars, planes, trains and boats as they do not generally stay put, unless they are part of a monument were they would remain mostly still. You can map the piers and mooring points etc. if yo... commented 2025-11-17 22:47:28 UTC by Udarian ♦528 |
| 146548164 (Comments: 2) | KBM-Fink (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174794807 habe ich die alten, 128 gelöschten Nodes wiederhergestellt. Dort, wo es nun im nahen Umkreis Hydrantdupletten gab, habe ich sie zusammengeführt und das alte Objekt erhalten ... commented 2025-11-17 22:44:57 UTC by Strubbl ♦569 |
| 173242779 (Comments: 1) | bdnrmrt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed a probable typo in some of these parking spaces: they have access=publicgendered_modalitiesgendered_modalities, did you really mean to tag that? commented 2025-11-17 22:35:10 UTC by stellarrrr ♦3 |
| 174147156 (Comments: 2) | Raymo853 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Who is the other user? I do not know how to determine that. commented 2025-11-17 22:26:56 UTC by Raymo853 ♦8 |
| 173483230 (Comments: 1) | szedar (Discussed changesets: 26) | Czym jest tag legacy=? commented 2025-11-17 22:15:28 UTC by zuicz ♦288 |
| 174725956 (Comments: 2) | Kompleksowe Remonty - Usługi Remontowo-Budowlane (Discussed changesets: 1) | I tak życzymy powodzenia :) commented 2025-11-17 22:14:56 UTC by Barroszt ♦307 |
| 174793921 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Contattato utente, spiegato che prima c'è la footway poi la scalinata e non al contrario https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174386253 commented 2025-11-17 22:07:16 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦130 |
| 174386253 (Comments: 4) | giulcenc (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793921 commented 2025-11-17 22:06:43 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦130 |
| 173400320 (Comments: 1) | Zhakupova Tomiris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, if you are not sure about what you are seeing or mapping, please do not upload to OSM. Visit https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/ to understand what OSM is about commented 2025-11-17 22:06:04 UTC by Enock4seth ♦586 |
| 162028937 (Comments: 1) | Matteoalghisi (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12549969564 can you review the localisation ? commented 2025-11-17 22:05:16 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,308 |
| 174671518 (Comments: 1) | Fox! (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793... commented 2025-11-17 22:05:14 UTC by QuiLe ♦13 |
| 174666151 (Comments: 1) | Fox! (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793... commented 2025-11-17 22:05:14 UTC by QuiLe ♦13 |
| 162028943 (Comments: 1) | Matteoalghisi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12549999145 quel type de barrière ? elle est sur le chemin ? Cordialement, Marc commented 2025-11-17 22:03:25 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,308 |
| 174785852 (Comments: 1) | Tomek100 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Po twoich edycjach pozostaje bardzo dużo pojedynczych węzłów bez znaczników. Niektóre leżą osobno a niektóre nakładają się na węzły różnych obiektów. Zwracaj uwagi na informacje o błędach.... commented 2025-11-17 21:56:43 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦571 |
| 174629990 (Comments: 2) | Fox! (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793... commented 2025-11-17 21:53:40 UTC by QuiLe ♦13 |
| 174630354 (Comments: 1) | Fox! (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793... commented 2025-11-17 21:50:51 UTC by QuiLe ♦13 |
| 174630518 (Comments: 1) | Fox! (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793... commented 2025-11-17 21:50:51 UTC by QuiLe ♦13 |
| 174630421 (Comments: 2) | Fox! (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793... commented 2025-11-17 21:50:51 UTC by QuiLe ♦13 |
| 174689818 (Comments: 3) | FinnAwes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @DD1GJ Relation: Bus 876: Flensburg => Eggebek seems to be fine: https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=19840674&_noCache=on# https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/relation.php?id=19840674&lang=en commented 2025-11-17 21:46:04 UTC by FinnAwes ♦1 |
| 174731193 (Comments: 3) | Pan_palat (Discussed changesets: 14) | wykonana z konta trolla więc automatycznie podejrzana commented 2025-11-17 21:40:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 173777267 (Comments: 5) | pugcookie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maybe hoa? I can try and find out commented 2025-11-17 21:38:29 UTC by GMUCams ♦1 |
| 165320634 (Comments: 1) | MadoElineLize (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, vous avez effacé les heures d'ouverture, le type de cuisine et l'indication d'absence de toilettes accessible. est-ce que c'est voulu ou c'est un bug de l'application ? Cordialement, Marc commented 2025-11-17 21:34:20 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,308 |
| 167926378 (Comments: 1) | SYED ASIF AHME (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12943536548 whats' this objet ? the name of a building ? Regards, Marc commented 2025-11-17 21:16:23 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,308 |
| 174499823 (Comments: 3) | ariel yusuf 67_67 (Discussed changesets: 1) | דיון בשאכול בפורום הנ"ל commented 2025-11-17 21:04:49 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 167815006 (Comments: 2) | eireidium (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks for catching that - as always - an odd name for a way ;-) commented 2025-11-17 20:53:03 UTC by eireidium ♦32 |
| 174594564 (Comments: 3) | PedestrianMapping_StealthMapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | It would be good if you could go back through your previous edits and remove any crossing=tags you have added at the intersection of sidewalks and service ways. Especially if you are a part of a corporate mapper, just leaving such edits is going to c... commented 2025-11-17 20:42:21 UTC by CRCulver ♦202 |
| 174773894 (Comments: 2) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 82) | What do you think specifically is salvageable in this edit? commented 2025-11-17 20:36:26 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 174783690 (Comments: 2) | VLD062 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, Flap Slimy Outward I modified the tagging from highway=unclassified to highway=service because, according to the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified), highway=unclassified is meant for minor public roads th... commented 2025-11-17 20:30:39 UTC by VLD062 ♦42 |
| 174604211 (Comments: 2) | helenab29 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Habi Danke für den Hinweis. Es hat mich schon ein bisschen überrascht, dass es so ein Feld gibt. LG commented 2025-11-17 20:29:26 UTC by helenab29 ♦1 |
| 174661150 (Comments: 6) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Na sentinelu widac, że tu jest rozkopany teren, co odpowiednio oznacyzłem, ale po chwili zniknęło... commented 2025-11-17 20:25:24 UTC by charl3s ♦184 |
| 174742663 (Comments: 1) | geoTD (Discussed changesets: 15) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET There is no university named "Sint-Lucas Herenwoning". This is not a university. This is just a students’ residence. commented 2025-11-17 20:21:59 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 174771339 (Comments: 6) | Boris Kislov (Discussed changesets: 1) | PB contact commented 2025-11-17 20:21:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174738329 (Comments: 2) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 35) | Updated, Thanks commented 2025-11-17 20:18:14 UTC by Termininja ♦7 |
| 167664846 (Comments: 2) | steffenetz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bei dem "Betriebsgebäude" handelt es sich um eine Trafostation der ENWG. Und die ENWG als Eigentümer und Betreiber dieser Station hat ihr den Namen "Schwimmhalle" gegeben (steht auf einem Schild an der Station). Der Eint... commented 2025-11-17 20:15:55 UTC by steffenetz ♦4 |
| 174778156 (Comments: 1) | geoTD (Discussed changesets: 15) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Dear geoTD. This is another friendly attempt to reach you. You have ignored my previous messages so far and kept on redoing the same errors over and over. I suppose that your intention is that the map would displ... commented 2025-11-17 20:15:54 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 174463404 (Comments: 2) | 42dp (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bereits korrigiert. commented 2025-11-17 20:10:28 UTC by 42dp ♦3 |
| 174788718 (Comments: 2) | Antplanproje (Discussed changesets: 1) | güzergah yanlış yerel kaynaktan güncel hali alınarak sisteme yüklenecek commented 2025-11-17 20:05:11 UTC by Antplanproje ♦0 |
| 174728516 (Comments: 1) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 20) | Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildinājumiem. Daļa īsti neatbilst apzīmēšanas nosacījumiem - piemēram, te punkts apzīmēts ar: description="3 vietas" landuse=residential residential=trailer_park https:/... commented 2025-11-17 20:01:19 UTC by richlv ♦405 |
| 161309618 (Comments: 3) | T Ral (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre réponse, même un peu tardive. Si vous avez des difficultés pour corriger, n'hésitez pas à demander de l'aide. Cordialement Bonne suite de thèses commented 2025-11-17 19:57:27 UTC by Eric S ♦34 |
| 160729215 (Comments: 5) | KrzysztZ (Discussed changesets: 22) | W razie co to w przyszłości bym to poprawiał. Aktualnie trochę dzwoniłem by zdobyć jakieś informacje o tych wałach, okopach bo pojawiły się przesłanki o ograniczonej dostępności bądź całkowitym braku dostępu do tego miejsca jednak <... commented 2025-11-17 19:52:26 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦571 |
| 159052993 (Comments: 3) | Rick Richards (Discussed changesets: 92) | Pokial su tam naozaj 2 a s roznymi hodnotami cash_in, potom OK. iD editor zial nie je etalonom spravnosti a vymysla si vlastne veci. Do znacky brand by sa mal zapisovat vyrobca (znacka) bankomatu, nie banka, ktora ho prevadzkuje. Momentalne... commented 2025-11-17 19:51:45 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,728 |
| 174691392 (Comments: 4) | Paweł_M (Discussed changesets: 13) | Polecam suchy dzień na wycieczkę. Te prowizoryczne schodki są z płytek 25x25 albo 30x30 i jest tam dość stromo. Mnie po drodze złapał deszcz, płytki były pokryte liśćmi, a prowizoryczna "poręcz" zrobiona z pniaków drzew ... commented 2025-11-17 19:50:17 UTC by Paweł_M ♦11 |
| 167497311 (Comments: 1) | עמית אוסטרוב (Discussed changesets: 1) | נא לא לתת שמות שברורים מסוג הנקודה, תודה https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174788333 commented 2025-11-17 19:47:42 UTC by hatul ♦420 |
| 174569189 (Comments: 2) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thank you for your reply. My mistake. I updated the company name, but apparently overlooked the fact that they moved to another building 200 meters away. I have now corrected this to the new address. commented 2025-11-17 19:46:04 UTC by kOSMofant ♦8 |
| 174739040 (Comments: 3) | leeeb (Discussed changesets: 6) | Genau, der überfahrbare Minikreisel war gemäß Wiki richtig als solcher gemappt (Punkt). Lokai, vielen Dank für den Teilrevert aufgrund der weiteren Fehler an der B 427 und der Straße "im Grün" in Bruch... commented 2025-11-17 19:32:31 UTC by Pfälzer669 ♦35 |
| 174787071 (Comments: 3) | Marina Dental Clinic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wycofałem ten zestaw zmian. Przed podjęciem kolejnych edycji zapraszam do lektury: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487 commented 2025-11-17 19:23:45 UTC by Szymson ♦436 |
| 161539917 (Comments: 5) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ale intencją footway=link nie jest aby tamtędy pójść na ślepo wg. wskazówek nawigacji, tylko aby nie było przerwy w routingu. W sensie ,,prawnym'' można tam dalej iść, de facto jest to niemożliwe i nikt tego nigdy ni... commented 2025-11-17 19:15:10 UTC by VA00 ♦616 |
| 174757885 (Comments: 2) | öreg (Discussed changesets: 69) | Ja. Ich war am Sonntag dort Wandern. Ich habe festgestellt, dass der Acker (Farmland) garnicht so ist, wie ich doert schon seit Jahren erlebe. Ich werde versuuchen alles so zu editieren, wie es in der Wirklichkeit ist. Du Könntest mir auch helfe... commented 2025-11-17 19:09:26 UTC by öreg ♦21 |
| 173284201 (Comments: 6) | Robert Lazu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Did that information take the form of an image or a site plan? If so, what was the licence associated with that? If not, what form did it take? commented 2025-11-17 19:07:12 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,537 |
| 174463447 (Comments: 2) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 41) | Okej, dzięki za informację. Zmienię to w najbliższym czasie. commented 2025-11-17 19:03:32 UTC by RafaBoski ♦15 |
| 174785621 (Comments: 2) | FF Goeflan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added fire hydrants with names and coupling details" commented 2025-11-17 18:56:37 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 171348289 (Comments: 1) | user_7031 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Warum wurde der Knoten 12329054452 entfernt? Diesen hatte ich mit aktuellen Daten hinzugefügt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12329054452/history/1 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12329054452/history/2 commented 2025-11-17 18:51:01 UTC by ChroniclesOfCartography ♦1 |
| 174785551 (Comments: 1) | tuxayo (Discussed changesets: 49) | Fait avec https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter commented 2025-11-17 18:47:23 UTC by tuxayo ♦277 |
| 174785197 (Comments: 2) | tuxayo (Discussed changesets: 49) | C'est bon c'est corrigé https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174785551 commented 2025-11-17 18:47:03 UTC by tuxayo ♦277 |
| 174775966 (Comments: 1) | EddyATX (Discussed changesets: 1) | welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. You deleted part of the crossing in this edit - I fixed that for you, and moved the ALPR node to the actual location. Happy mapping! commented 2025-11-17 18:27:13 UTC by citrula ♦969 |
| 174728308 (Comments: 12) | The Invisible Freak (Discussed changesets: 9) | Danke :-) commented 2025-11-17 18:26:12 UTC by aixbrick ♦875 |
| 160195172 (Comments: 1) | claudia10 (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hallo Claudia10, ich weiß deine Änderung ist fast schon ein Jahr her. Weiter südlich findest du die Büchereibushaltestelle auf der Dahmestraße (In der Standartkartenansicht "Carto" ist dort eine Haus... commented 2025-11-17 18:25:13 UTC by fmc_3 ♦9 |
| 166074239 (Comments: 2) | Spush (Discussed changesets: 15) | Üdv! Általában FÖMI-re igazítok, ha valahol mégsem az valószínűleg figyelmetlenség lehetett. Üdv: Spush commented 2025-11-17 18:16:40 UTC by Spush ♦42 |
| 174783737 (Comments: 1) | saunter (Discussed changesets: 53) | You forgot to add the address details. commented 2025-11-17 18:16:06 UTC by Comino ♦246 |
| 174781158 (Comments: 1) | FFSchönwald112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen: Hier www.openstreetmap.org/way/73273412 steht noch der alte Name. Und bei den Adressen müsste der Straßenname noch angepas... commented 2025-11-17 18:05:58 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,132 |
| 174627688 (Comments: 5) | David Reik (Discussed changesets: 25) | I submitted an issue long time ago, and it seems this came out as a response. It would be good to come to a agreement if to use it as a symbol (though it will probably not work on other maps using osmc:symbol). And how to tag two-color routes. commented 2025-11-17 18:03:50 UTC by Mashin ♦583 |
| 174780943 (Comments: 1) | Orogi (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-11-17 18:00:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 173731848 (Comments: 1) | bicyclett (Discussed changesets: 23) | Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access?uselang=en#Possible_tagging_mistakes against the use of access=bus commented 2025-11-17 17:55:28 UTC by networkException ♦2 |
| 174727641 (Comments: 7) | gallseife (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi aixbrick, ich habe es mal zur Diskussion gestellt: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bussteige-mit-knick-zwecks-haltmarkierung/138226 commented 2025-11-17 17:39:04 UTC by gallseife ♦47 |
| 16079322 (Comments: 6) | cepesko (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hallo cepesko, ja, der Kreuzweg ist immer noch vorhanden, ich schrieb ja auch zuvor: "Es gibt zwar den "Kreuzweg", aber der heisst laut Beschilderung vor Ort "Weg der Hoffnung" und nicht "Kreuzweg von Poin... commented 2025-11-17 17:32:58 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦79 |
| 174677037 (Comments: 2) | bes199 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke für die Korrektur, mir war nicht klar, dass die Straße für Fahrräder länger offen bleibt. Beste Grüße commented 2025-11-17 17:32:17 UTC by bes199 ♦10 |
| 174438902 (Comments: 1) | CameraHawk (Discussed changesets: 1) | This data is accurate. Source: local knowledge. commented 2025-11-17 17:12:31 UTC by TactfulAimAttention ♦1 |
| 174777332 (Comments: 1) | arvedarved (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5039294 commented 2025-11-17 17:11:12 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦14 |
| 174777310 (Comments: 1) | arvedarved (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5037607 commented 2025-11-17 17:10:53 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦14 |
| 174777267 (Comments: 1) | arvedarved (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5042488 commented 2025-11-17 17:10:43 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦14 |
| 174780447 (Comments: 3) | pv1982 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Skicentrum Drechtsteden is geen gebouw. commented 2025-11-17 17:08:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174604521 (Comments: 1) | helenab29 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao Helena Ich bin wegen `review_requested=yes` hier. Die Änderungen sind prima. Gruss aus dem Liebefeld, Habi commented 2025-11-17 17:08:15 UTC by habi ♦1,969 |
| 174780697 (Comments: 1) | NorthOfEnglandMaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please be more careful with what you're changing next time, a section of a service road in Manchester was turned into a secondary highway on accident. I've gone ahead and reverted this for you. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... commented 2025-11-17 17:08:10 UTC by Aethonatic ♦14 |
| 174780724 (Comments: 1) | logpiyo (Discussed changesets: 1) | The comment was incorrect. It should have been "Add bicycle navigation lines in Ibaraki". Sorry for the mistake. commented 2025-11-17 17:00:38 UTC by logpiyo ♦1 |
| 174778556 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 308) | Na Sycowskiej. Nie edytowałem Sycowskiej. commented 2025-11-17 16:43:02 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦296 |
| 174670746 (Comments: 4) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 69) | Ah makes sense, thanks for fixing! commented 2025-11-17 16:40:24 UTC by willkmis ♦181 |
| 174762822 (Comments: 2) | Tomas Straupis (Discussed changesets: 82) | We use it in our Lithuanian community products. commented 2025-11-17 16:38:19 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,999 |
| 165500587 (Comments: 1) | nqou (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia! Kérlek, szerkesztés előtt mindig igazítsd a kedvenc légifotód a FÖMIhez, mert pl. a Bing is el van csúszva! Így kisebb eséllyel húzogatod félre a már (F&O... commented 2025-11-17 16:29:54 UTC by ITineris ♦395 |
| 174412366 (Comments: 4) | lightningmapper866 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Indien er alleen maar Strand staat, moet het dan gemapt worden als Strand Castricum aan Zee? commented 2025-11-17 16:21:58 UTC by VLD549 ♦315 |
| 174517832 (Comments: 1) | Ania Pakula (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13296969951/history w sensie że ten staw jest zasypany? czy to piaskownica o nazwie staw? commented 2025-11-17 16:19:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 173830010 (Comments: 1) | zbyszekrzepka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Różne wartości rozdzielamy średnikiem bez spacji. Poprawiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174779513 commented 2025-11-17 16:16:59 UTC by Marek-M ♦970 |
| 174487058 (Comments: 2) | Laudna (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thanks for your question! That's interesting that the BAG has de, I based this change on the streetsign, I figured the streetsign would be correct, but maybe not? commented 2025-11-17 16:06:54 UTC by Laudna ♦2 |
| 174751198 (Comments: 3) | retrograde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, thanks for pointing that out. I deleted those driveways because I thought they were unnecessary clutter, but I didn’t realize OSM aims for that level of detail. Totally my mistake and I’ll stick to the guidelines and make sure to add... commented 2025-11-17 16:06:45 UTC by retrograde ♦1 |
| 174777307 (Comments: 3) | Kees 59 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Beide gedaan! commented 2025-11-17 16:02:38 UTC by jb54osm ♦195 |
| 174307461 (Comments: 1) | elijah yaw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Once again do not blindly map everything as a building or something else that you are not sure about, eg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448057963 commented 2025-11-17 15:57:47 UTC by Enock4seth ♦586 |
| 174256952 (Comments: 1) | elijah yaw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, if you are not sure about what you are seeing please don't map it into OpenStreetMap. What is this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447788088 ? Don't just move ways around or add random tags to an... commented 2025-11-17 15:55:40 UTC by Enock4seth ♦586 |
| 167493614 (Comments: 1) | casoum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut Casoum, Je voudrais évoquer avec toi le contour du massif de la Lauzière. Je suis partisan d'une séparation Lauzière/Grand Arc. Je vois que sur ce changeset tu préfères une Lauzière... commented 2025-11-17 15:55:11 UTC by sly ♦14 |
| 157352800 (Comments: 4) | 9ix (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ich bin die Strecke durchgegangen und habe lediglich bei dem einen von Dir genannten Abschnitt ein tatsächlich übersehenes "access:no" gefunden und entfernt. commented 2025-11-17 15:49:38 UTC by 9ix ♦20 |
| 174775780 (Comments: 1) | Marek_FZG (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9955335766 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-11-17 15:32:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,850 |
| 106890417 (Comments: 2) | whatismoss (Discussed changesets: 29) | Bonjour, Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12883500, Parc d'Activité Armor Océan semble être un nom alternatif, Cf. https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/etablissement/70204275500513 et https://www.cgi.... commented 2025-11-17 15:12:50 UTC by trial ♦977 |
| 174772741 (Comments: 3) | jeffreyknol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fietsers zijn meestal uitgezonderd van oneway=yes Is dat het geval? Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor mofa en moped. MS Tarnweg. Geef svp concreet aan wat je wijzigt. MVG eggie commented 2025-11-17 15:11:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 173705072 (Comments: 3) | BuckarooBanzai (Discussed changesets: 1) | ..ok, dafür wurde aber schon sehr viel gelöscht... wenn ich zähle ~ 17 Ways gelöscht. Ich hab es mal rückgängig gemacht.. commented 2025-11-17 15:03:18 UTC by miche101 ♦145 |
| 174740514 (Comments: 1) | Robert66 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Motorways in the Montreal region were all aligned using precise geodesic data. Please do not move or realign them. Bing and ESRI aerial photos are not aligned correctly right now. Wi will realign them as they were. Thanks! commented 2025-11-17 14:57:06 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦446 |
| 174246844 (Comments: 2) | Geim (Discussed changesets: 75) | Based on this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5039408#map=18/52.338528/6.591995&layers=N And BGT confirmation: https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=237208.89&geometry.y=484075.64&zoomlevel=13.29 commented 2025-11-17 14:57:01 UTC by Geim ♦194 |
| 174772259 (Comments: 1) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 63) | Słusznie. iD błędnie to zinterpretował, dziękuję za poprawę :) commented 2025-11-17 14:54:31 UTC by Szymson ♦436 |
| 147657657 (Comments: 2) | ErichJacobi (Discussed changesets: 25) | Warum hast du bei osm.org/way/24719953 die Einbahnstraße entfernt. Die müsste meines Wissens nach bleiben Viele Grüße commented 2025-11-17 14:39:37 UTC by der eine lauch ♦1 |
| 174455303 (Comments: 1) | Jelv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. I am pretty sure that the part slagerij & partyservice is not supposed to be in the name. It should be mapped differently. Perhaps you could check? (As I am not a professional mapper). Thank y... commented 2025-11-17 14:37:03 UTC by VLD549 ♦315 |
| 174737688 (Comments: 1) | civ2mapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ist mir nicht klar geworden, warum du die Radspur auf bei diesem Stück auf der einen Seite entfernt hast. sieht doch genauso aus wie auf der gesamten Kreuzungen und es gibt rote Streifen für beide Richtungen, oder hat sich etwas ge&a... commented 2025-11-17 14:33:22 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,432 |
| 174535489 (Comments: 1) | mmaly86 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie wiem jaki był cel tej edycji, ale wygląda jak wandalizm. Wycofałem zmiany. commented 2025-11-17 14:22:54 UTC by YomanNH ♦402 |
| 174500068 (Comments: 2) | the king of the maps (Discussed changesets: 1) | אפשר הסבר לגבי מה ניסיתם להוסיף כאן? מה זה Artist Colony? commented 2025-11-17 14:15:12 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 174500366 (Comments: 1) | that good that osem (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174773934 commented 2025-11-17 14:13:28 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 174500503 (Comments: 2) | that good that osem (Discussed changesets: 2) | Change reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174773894 commented 2025-11-17 14:12:27 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 94393030 (Comments: 2) | Jerome-Herbinet (Discussed changesets: 7) | stumbled upon this dune, and as this question here was ignored for years heh, I restored the tag here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174773779 commented 2025-11-17 14:10:55 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦353 |
| 173843365 (Comments: 1) | Feherzsombor203022 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia! Pár apróság: Csak a fizikailag is elválasztott sávokat szoktuk külön vonalként rajzolni (ld. a 71-es főút Fürdő utcai körforgalmánál). Má... commented 2025-11-17 14:05:25 UTC by ITineris ♦395 |
| 159012402 (Comments: 2) | streetEdit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo @ManuelB701. Danke für den edit; ich kenne mich leider nicht so gut aus mit Details zum solcher Änderung. wollte der community aber die Schließung markieren. Danke commented 2025-11-17 14:01:33 UTC by streetEdit ♦2 |
| 174772056 (Comments: 1) | KX675 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Are you sure? Afaik it's only "Robert Black General Out-patient Clinic" that's renamed to "San Po Kong Robert Black Family Medicine Clinic", with no name changes to Robert Black Health Centre (which contains more than ju... commented 2025-11-17 13:54:11 UTC by kingkingHK ♦31 |
| 173937203 (Comments: 3) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for the response commented 2025-11-17 13:46:18 UTC by Vladislav Konoplev ♦10 |
| 174748177 (Comments: 1) | DeeBee Cooper (Discussed changesets: 1) | There will be another 20 nodes to add, however I am waiting to see if this first node meets the standards. commented 2025-11-17 13:44:30 UTC by DeeBee Cooper ♦1 |
| 174772239 (Comments: 1) | geoTD (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello, geoTD. Could we please discuss this? I fixed several faulty changesets here yesterday. You inadvertently added incorrect address data into OSM. And you created no less than 5 new universities here, which is very unlikely; there... commented 2025-11-17 13:37:29 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,644 |
| 174769145 (Comments: 1) | DRamalho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, j'ai corrigé votre ajout: - nom en minuscule - ajout des adresses au mauvais endroit (pas dans nom) - ajout des adresses via l'outil pifomètre : https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/pifomap.html?insee=5... commented 2025-11-17 13:16:20 UTC by Carto75 ♦18 |
| 174172364 (Comments: 2) | spirit_lake (Discussed changesets: 5) | Since there was no response, I applied the suggested changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174771494 commented 2025-11-17 13:15:07 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 174703722 (Comments: 3) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 422) | But you know that we try to use only British English, right? commented 2025-11-17 13:15:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,370 |
| 165757177 (Comments: 2) | Tirkon (Discussed changesets: 14) | Danke für den HInweis. :-) Das ist passiert, als ich in der Gegend Adressen recherchiert habe und wahrscheinlich überall erst einmal die Adressen Tags und buiding=house reinkopiert habe. Bei der Kirche habe ich dann vergessen, letzteres r&u... commented 2025-11-17 13:14:27 UTC by Tirkon ♦16 |
| 174205940 (Comments: 2) | בית אלפא (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174771384 commented 2025-11-17 13:12:31 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦674 |
| 174743959 (Comments: 1) | Jvitegem (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi, you added many "FIX_ME = YES" here - can this be changed to something more meaningful, if anything needs to be fixed at all? commented 2025-11-17 13:09:01 UTC by mueschel ♦6,730 |
| 174770893 (Comments: 1) | RobotFK (Discussed changesets: 20) | Fatfingerd auf review_requested. commented 2025-11-17 13:01:43 UTC by RobotFK ♦24 |
| 171113762 (Comments: 5) | eultra (Discussed changesets: 18) | je fais simplement valoir que le "private" ne fonctionne pas... je ne sais pas suffisamment me servir de OSM pour régler "proprement" le problème. commented 2025-11-17 12:59:41 UTC by Tibo05200 ♦3 |
| 174761121 (Comments: 2) | _-@-_ FahrplanSeppl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, gut, dann greife ich es nicht mehr an. Kannst du dann wenigsten die Gleisverschlingung entweder näher zusammen oder weiter auseinander geben? Brauche es für mein GIS (RBL System der Graz Linien) welches auf OSM basiert. Die Gle... commented 2025-11-17 12:49:31 UTC by _-@-_ FahrplanSeppl ♦1 |
| 174769456 (Comments: 2) | altstadtplumbingsvc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted ways and nodes" commented 2025-11-17 12:37:20 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 174767593 (Comments: 2) | Tebarzt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Kartenbearbeitungen: "Aktualisierte Dienststraßen, Fußwege und Wege mit Attributen wie Oberfläche, Zugang und Fahrradzugang" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a samp... commented 2025-11-17 12:37:13 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,474 |
| 133616306 (Comments: 5) | Gruemscheler (Discussed changesets: 3) | super, danke der Rückmeldung commented 2025-11-17 12:28:35 UTC by Piagno ♦115 |
| 174763460 (Comments: 1) | 10-NHN-DKraijer (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dag 10 NHN D Kraijer. Dit staat nu open voor regulier verkeer mocht je de highway tag toevoegen. Wellicht access=no ? highway tag ontbreekt nog. highway=service service=emergency_access Je route zal nu niets doen. Ga na of de ro... commented 2025-11-17 12:27:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174655560 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 277) | Cześć, poprawiłem kolejność w relacjach w tym zestawie - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174769249. Przy edytowaniu relacji w JOSM, możesz używać narzędzia, które sortuje wszystkich członków w odpowiedniej kolejności,... commented 2025-11-17 12:26:51 UTC by stasiu512 ♦196 |
| 174439110 (Comments: 4) | tagishsimon (Discussed changesets: 12) | Well yes or no. I specified the URL of the search screen for Aberdeenshire HER; you've supplied the tagINFO page for the ref: on OSM. All that we need now is for someone to document the tag, which I may get around to doing. See also similar tags... commented 2025-11-17 12:24:49 UTC by tagishsimon ♦8 |
| 174768131 (Comments: 2) | pv1982 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Duplicated tagging verwijderd commented 2025-11-17 12:14:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,500 |
| 174617129 (Comments: 3) | IsleofSkye9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok, thank you very much for the explanation. Seems that there is only one way into the residential area. regards commented 2025-11-17 12:10:19 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,598 |
| 174015686 (Comments: 4) | LAZACARTO (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour désolé si mes interventions vous semblent inappropriées. Je suis debutant et ne maitrise pas totalement OSM. je contribue le plus souvent via street. De memoire je me souviens bien que sur Aubervilliers il y avait des... commented 2025-11-17 12:09:51 UTC by LAZACARTO ♦5 |
| 174759738 (Comments: 6) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 168) | pisałem też na Discordzie, napisze i tutaj: nie zawracaj mi głowy edycjami theDM (czy innych) chyba że są wadliwe, do wycofania i możesz je podlinkować naprawdę nie brak mi rzeczy do zrobienia, jak nie potrafisz znaleźć tych rzekomo ... commented 2025-11-17 12:09:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,446 |
| 135732076 (Comments: 2) | Yanivdu (Discussed changesets: 10) | ראיתי תמונות שיש במקום אבן זיכרון https://amudanan.co.il/#!wiki=P600701 commented 2025-11-17 11:51:42 UTC by hatul ♦420 |
| 174533760 (Comments: 2) | tagishsimon (Discussed changesets: 12) | Yes, looks good now. Sorry about my error; thank you for fixing it. I'll get around to documenting the ref sometime. It's here: https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/detail.aspx?refno=NK14NW0419 commented 2025-11-17 11:49:17 UTC by tagishsimon ♦8 |
| 174385047 (Comments: 2) | tagishsimon (Discussed changesets: 12) | It's the Aberdeenshire Historic Environment Record record ID for this bridge & its plaques. https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/detail.aspx?refno=NJ92NE0042 commented 2025-11-17 11:47:36 UTC by tagishsimon ♦8 |
| 174534891 (Comments: 4) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for fixing the issues I raised. I haven't noticed any other specific issues (I've not checked carefully). I just want to point out in general that adding separate sidewalks can easily break routing, particularly for walking. ... commented 2025-11-17 11:43:00 UTC by will_p ♦149 |
| 174516332 (Comments: 2) | tagishsimon (Discussed changesets: 12) | points to this - https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/default.aspx?Authority=Angus commented 2025-11-17 11:40:49 UTC by tagishsimon ♦8 |
| 174741617 (Comments: 4) | Tibo05200 (Discussed changesets: 3) | maybe nothing jutifies my action but i'm a farmer, not a user of OSM, i'd like not have to use it, this takes my time and my energy both online and IRL. so i may not use it correctly. the path that i just supress before modifying th... commented 2025-11-17 11:39:12 UTC by Tibo05200 ♦3 |
| 174721082 (Comments: 2) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 125) | 1.1. At least we can consider whether classification should change when it intersects roads of the same, or higher class (ie `=primary` Nathan Rd). But this is considering Argyle St routing, not MK Rd alone. 1.2. Tai Kok Tsui (also currently `=ter... commented 2025-11-17 11:37:56 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,658 |
| 174748420 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 15) | This changeset was reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174767223 commented 2025-11-17 11:35:26 UTC by ilias_ ♦344 |
 | 174748641 (Comments: 3) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 15) | This changeset was reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174767166 commented 2025-11-17 11:34:05 UTC by ilias_ ♦344 |
| 161257412 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 429) | Nie zgadzało się, gdyż zaszły zmiany w terenie, których szybko nie uwzględniłem, przeniesiono przejście dla pieszych, dano lewoskręt do Jana Marii Prufferów, przesunięto chodniki, zmiana kształtów trawników, co s... commented 2025-11-17 11:33:07 UTC by Barroszt ♦307 |
| 173146249 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 429) | Ale żart xd commented 2025-11-17 11:30:51 UTC by Barroszt ♦307 |
| 174745494 (Comments: 2) | Freemo17 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please map only the objects as requested by the project Best regards --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174745494 commented 2025-11-17 11:25:00 UTC by Frans S ♦10,070 |
| 174659952 (Comments: 1) | amir editor (Discussed changesets: 1) | این مکان به تازگی افتتاح شده است و در آن غذای ایرانی و ایتالیایی همراه با نوشیدنی هایی همچون قهوه و قلیان سرو میشود commented 2025-11-17 11:13:51 UTC by Emirefshin ♦1 |
| 171129813 (Comments: 1) | sserafin (Discussed changesets: 18) | Nie twórz fikcji. commented 2025-11-17 11:13:26 UTC by YomanNH ♦402 |
| 174649645 (Comments: 2) | BrandonMountain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi tmr21, thank you for informing me about this neighbourhood. I will defer to your edits. commented 2025-11-17 11:10:26 UTC by BrandonMountain ♦1 |