| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 190421940 (Comments: 1) | kadiwa (Discussed changesets: 18) | Korrektur: Quelle sind der Hinweis note/5568421 und die verlinkte Webseite. commented 2026-10-16 22:14:26 UTC by kadiwa ♦151 |
| 134779908 (Comments: 1) | renekost (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, kannst du etwas zu note/5584166 sagen? commented 2026-10-16 22:07:02 UTC by kadiwa ♦151 |
 | 190603034 (Comments: 1) | marnow (Discussed changesets: 2) | Jak samochód przejedzie, skoro są bariery? commented 2026-10-16 21:39:45 UTC by maro21 ♦955 |
 | 186970204 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 33) | This doesn't seem to match the project map published on https://www.t2d.sa.gov.au/project-map . Tunnel boring had only just begun at the time of this edit and, at least to this layperson, there's nothing to be seen on the ground ind... commented 2026-10-16 21:35:22 UTC by ouchjars ♦7 |
 | 190240204 (Comments: 2) | Emiel3673 (Discussed changesets: 7) | ? commented 2026-10-16 21:33:17 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦808 |
 | 190582023 (Comments: 4) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 131) | At least it is plausible with the one way in that direction. It is a bit strange at the other end where it appears to end twice. Ive corrected the starting point. commented 2026-10-16 21:33:08 UTC by Pete Owens ♦91 |
 | 190203720 (Comments: 1) | DarkHeartOfTheWood (Discussed changesets: 34) | These features were recreated half a day later by changeset 190230813; I removed them again with changeset 190626601. commented 2026-10-16 21:29:55 UTC by heftych1 ♦2 |
| 182524962 (Comments: 1) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 101) | Hi StreetSurveyor, I noticed that the foot access on New Rutherford Avenue has been changed back and forth over the past 2 years quite a few times, and that you've changed it to "Yes" 4 times. There is a lot going on in this area, and... commented 2026-10-16 21:21:19 UTC by D Ave ♦3 |
| 190626601 (Comments: 1) | heftych1 (Discussed changesets: 7) | These features were re-created less than half a day after being deleted (changeset 190203720 by $DarkHeartOfTheWood ). They were originally tagged as "proposed", but I could find no evidence of any such proposal. Then, the tags were changed... commented 2026-10-16 21:19:51 UTC by heftych1 ♦2 |
| 190619469 (Comments: 1) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 194) | Dobrze że poprawiasz takie rzeczy, aczkolwiek czasami te węzły celowo są blisko siebie, bo tak jest w rzeczywistości;) Park Praski sam robiłem to wiem. Z budynkami różnie bywa, czasami jest źle, a czasami rzeczywiście jest taka skompl... commented 2026-10-16 21:15:32 UTC by Yukiro ♦64 |
 | 189111246 (Comments: 1) | Claudiochess (Discussed changesets: 1) | Muito bom! Já morei em Pacaraima, hoje resido em Boa Vista, mas sempre que possível faço minhas contribuições nessa cidade amada. Parabéns pela sua iniciativa, sua colaboração é de grande... commented 2026-10-16 21:14:20 UTC by AssisFS ♦19 |
| 190167915 (Comments: 3) | PCK46 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Załącznik czego? Został ogłoszony nowy przetarg czy to część jakiegoś istniejącego? Ani zestaw poprawek ani obiekt linii nie mają znacznika "source", brakuje mi informacji skąd w ogóle plany takiej łącznicy commented 2026-10-16 21:00:47 UTC by elot360 ♦67 |
| 190623405 (Comments: 1) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | the ways you removed "unsigned_ref=SR 836" from are part of the unsigned_ref=836 route relation at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1856420, so I would think that they should have "unsigned_ref=SR 836" tagged on them. I am n... commented 2026-10-16 20:58:58 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 190612503 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Please at least try to place these precisely before adding a fixme=. I can see a few parking spots reserved for charging in the Holiday Inn lot in Esri imagery, is that where this is supposed to be? commented 2026-10-16 20:53:11 UTC by impiaaa ♦500 |
| 190605210 (Comments: 1) | smrtdlks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor je bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG, eggie commented 2026-10-16 20:49:20 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190625317 (Comments: 1) | MatthijsTrail2018 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-16 20:47:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 184961577 (Comments: 1) | kenny2332 (Discussed changesets: 3) | What is up with way 1534502164? It has no tags. Do you remember creating it? commented 2026-10-16 20:45:28 UTC by YourLocalEnbyMapper ♦4 |
 | 190169323 (Comments: 2) | moaxed (Discussed changesets: 17) | I am aware. As I said about the other question you had: giving landuse to all of Norrbotten and Västerbotten is a project I will work on for months. I'm just starting with adding landuse. Since I'm using polygons/data from Lantmät... commented 2026-10-16 20:44:20 UTC by moaxed ♦11 |
 | 190624885 (Comments: 1) | alex9446 (Discussed changesets: 1) | wrong titole; add maxheight commented 2026-10-16 20:40:34 UTC by alex9446 ♦1 |
| 190624845 (Comments: 1) | jmsbert (Discussed changesets: 73) | correction: worked on rcn route "13-48" source: bicycle data provided by LK CLP in 2026-08 commented 2026-10-16 20:27:32 UTC by jmsbert ♦172 |
 | 155397547 (Comments: 3) | soshial (Discussed changesets: 20) | Yes, thank you, i was in rush driving and couldnt add it properly. commented 2026-10-16 20:23:50 UTC by soshial ♦47 |
 | 182217710 (Comments: 2) | Peter Brodersen (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ja, wood. Jeg må have lavet en tastefejl. Godt fanget. commented 2026-10-16 20:20:17 UTC by Peter Brodersen ♦17 |
 | 190447137 (Comments: 1) | Valkai_S (Discussed changesets: 27) | Szia! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415348210 Mi az hogy name=Privát? Ez egy magánház, vagy vmi Privát nevű bolt? Tamás commented 2026-10-16 20:11:52 UTC by vasony ♦616 |
 | 190614838 (Comments: 1) | MountVentoux (Discussed changesets: 5) | Why, there is no structure like a traffic_island for splitting and making a secondary_link. There is a traffic_island in the middle but know you draw the way line almost over this traffic_island. I do not agree with this. What is... commented 2026-10-16 20:08:54 UTC by Allroads ♦470 |
| 190337596 (Comments: 4) | Mapfixer12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Jött válasz: "Kérdésére válaszolva a TESCO a Talfája tanya térségben található. Talfája út, mint közterület elnevezés a hivatalos nyilv&... commented 2026-10-16 20:06:02 UTC by vasony ♦616 |
| 190513798 (Comments: 3) | DX5536 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi @DX5536, I've corrected the oneway-restrictions as intended: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190624357 commented 2026-10-16 20:05:16 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦120 |
| 190040579 (Comments: 2) | granitschädel (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo, solange wie ein Gebäude noch intakt ist, belasse ich es lieber bei building=yes. Liegt aber auch daran, dass abandoned=building selbst in der OSM-eigenen „Standardkarte“ nicht gerendert wird, obwohl auch ein leerstehendes G... commented 2026-10-16 19:50:55 UTC by granitschädel ♦35 |
 | 190583536 (Comments: 1) | AndresPA1601 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Saludos. La cantidad de pisos building:levels= es preferente a la altura height= de una construcción. Para que lo tomes en cuenta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building:levels commented 2026-10-16 19:48:55 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,569 |
| 190481176 (Comments: 6) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 113) | That makes sense, I know with evri the lockers would be listed before being actually installed. Anyways I appreciate the work you're putting in! commented 2026-10-16 19:47:07 UTC by Falsernet ♦153 |
| 190485944 (Comments: 1) | utvonalfelmeresek (Discussed changesets: 47) | Foxpost vagy packeta feliratos volt a zbox? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10297410883 commented 2026-10-16 19:41:52 UTC by vasony-qa ♦13 |
 | 175562200 (Comments: 4) | Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (Discussed changesets: 33) | Kdybych aspoň věděl kde to bylo, tak bych si mohl zkontrolovat, co tam vlastně dát a kde. Při práci myslíte jako když jsou stažené sem tam nějaké linie hranic, ale ne relace k nim? K tomu by mohla sloužit p... commented 2026-10-16 19:31:52 UTC by Yakari (kleiner Indianer) ♦83 |
| 190463399 (Comments: 1) | FlashStopFall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome toOSM! commented 2026-10-16 19:28:57 UTC by xanderthemapper31 ♦11 |
| 190262056 (Comments: 1) | DevTimmOfTO (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bei nicht mehr existierenden Gebäuden bitte kein building=yes hinzufügen. Danke commented 2026-10-16 19:27:04 UTC by granitschädel ♦35 |
 | 189836509 (Comments: 2) | Arctic_Sparkii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Not as a ride through trail out to the Ibex Ridge/Scout Lake area. The middle 2/3 is only game trails, flooded marshy areas and one spot is a rock hop creek crossing to get around a rock bluff. Also a lot of tree falls on the game trail that require ... commented 2026-10-16 19:21:18 UTC by Arctic_Sparkii ♦1 |
 | 190622411 (Comments: 1) | SpaceTracer (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: Comment is “Updated layer tag for footway at Le Suffren Hotel & Marina. #adt” Source used was Esri World Imagery. commented 2026-10-16 19:15:10 UTC by SpaceTracer ♦11 |
| 188991961 (Comments: 1) | Thomas-Munichways (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo bitte schau mal auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5583410 Du hast hier zum Teil die bicycle=no entfernt, an manchen Stellen stehen sogar noch die VZ239 an den Wegen in den Daten. Wenn da VZ239 stehen, dann darf kein bi... commented 2026-10-16 18:36:09 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
 | 190267672 (Comments: 1) | bxl-forever_repair (Discussed changesets: 36) | The access tags were added based on the convention on tagging the signs that are used in nature reserves as described on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Signs_in_nature_reserves. commented 2026-10-16 18:15:40 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦95 |
| 184772208 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 112) | Was this a 100% confirmed change? If so resolve the anonymous note at the location challenging it commented 2026-10-16 18:08:58 UTC by I-76 ♦89 |
| 190568343 (Comments: 2) | Paweł_M (Discussed changesets: 27) | cześć, nie ma problemu. Akurat coś załatwiałem w Mrówce i zobaczyłem tam AED, które chciałem dodać. Jak je dodawałem to pomyślałem, że poprawię trochę parkingów w okolicy. Całkiem fajnie mapuje się parkingi, gdzie... commented 2026-10-16 18:00:26 UTC by Paweł_M ♦50 |
| 179056573 (Comments: 1) | Map_HeRo (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Map_HeRo, du hast https://osm.org/way/759866577 als ford=yes getaggt. Ich nehm das mal wieder raus, so feucht sieht es da gar nicht aus :) commented 2026-10-16 17:48:47 UTC by FraukeLeo ♦306 |
 | 190542695 (Comments: 1) | CLAUDE999 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please stop uploading these nodes with only foreign tags on top of existing train stations. Some of them have been uploaded 6 times! commented 2026-10-16 17:43:56 UTC by mueschel ♦7,399 |
| 190609314 (Comments: 1) | Sara Rebecca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Edit, Cumberland Md. homes added commented 2026-10-16 17:41:23 UTC by Sara Rebecca ♦1 |
| 190550480 (Comments: 1) | Neozek (Discussed changesets: 1) | "Schody na pláž" are you sure is it the right place an is it an attraction? commented 2026-10-16 17:37:35 UTC by Mammi71 ♦289 |
| 183581973 (Comments: 2) | Tas kal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Some vertices got dragged by accident while editing, including the canal junction, and the apartment building was retagged as the shop, so I've reverted those and kept your shop point. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190619166 commented 2026-10-16 17:33:32 UTC by Farcical2 ♦1 |
 | 190617545 (Comments: 1) | Popovici Predrag (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the name=* tag should be used for proper names only, not descriptions, which I suppose "Road to Eclipse by Luna" is. commented 2026-10-16 17:27:40 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,948 |
| 190618526 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 31) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-10-16 17:23:50 UTC by sahshoor ♦38 |
| 183165017 (Comments: 3) | ForestWhisperer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo ForestWhisperer, im Rahmen von dem Projekt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Berlin_Radinfrastruktur_(Vorrangnetz) hatten wir das vor etwa einem Jahr erfasst (siehe History: https://www.openstreetmap.org/wa... commented 2026-10-16 17:15:49 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦38 |
| 190595396 (Comments: 1) | nmimn (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ahoj, z akého dôvodu pridávaš layer=1 na celé úseky ciest, keď sa nejedná o mosty? Napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420085524, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527320880 (a je toho omnoho vi... commented 2026-10-16 17:12:13 UTC by t_ja ♦304 |
| 190609430 (Comments: 1) | edd345777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-16 17:11:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 183913824 (Comments: 3) | ForestWhisperer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, super, danke dir. commented 2026-10-16 17:11:26 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦38 |
| 190616941 (Comments: 2) | Simon_2006 (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #190618126 Je wijzigingen zijn teruggezet. Er is hier eenrichtingsverkeer muv lijnbussen (psv) en tweewielers. MVG eggie Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. Wanneer de bebording hier is gewijzigd... commented 2026-10-16 17:09:34 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190611479 (Comments: 1) | Precision Guesswork (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190611689 commented 2026-10-16 16:58:02 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
 | 190590143 (Comments: 1) | samho1234567 (Discussed changesets: 38) | The bus stops are put too close together. Refer to the TD page and the image https://www.td.gov.hk/tc/transport_in_hong_kong/land_based_cross_boundary_transport/athp/ commented 2026-10-16 16:57:05 UTC by Patrickov ♦110 |
 | 190439738 (Comments: 2) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi cowboyxup, thank you for reverting the changeset and reaching out to inform about connections and classifications. However, the current arrangement involves artificial triangles on the northern part of the junction, and I thought that a # type con... commented 2026-10-16 16:51:42 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦46 |
 | 189743596 (Comments: 1) | turki1998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | تركي هذه الخريطة عامة وليست مكان لأماكنك المفضلة وذكرياتك، نرجوا منكم استخدام المفضلة في جهازك لحفظ مثل تلك الأماكن ولا تضعها على الخريط... commented 2026-10-16 16:47:20 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦769 |
| 190317778 (Comments: 3) | Ouistiti-outang (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci pour cette réponse. Je me charge des retours arrières nécessaires. Bonne cartos à vous avec SC commented 2026-10-16 16:32:20 UTC by oldnab ♦12 |
| 190449967 (Comments: 1) | dornweg (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hallo dornweg, natürlich kann man solche Verkehrsinseln mappen. Nachteil im Vergleich zu vorher (keine Insel, nur ein way) ist aber, das jedes Navi wenn man geradeaus über die Kreuzung will nun ansagt "biegen sie rechts ab auf Mainbull... commented 2026-10-16 16:20:28 UTC by JochenOSM ♦151 |
| 190611192 (Comments: 1) | Emigre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-16 16:17:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190483720 (Comments: 2) | MappingJunkie (Discussed changesets: 16) | I didn't realize it was a county road! I will change back. I rode it a couple of weeks ago and it was in bad shape, with lots of ruts that have been there for over 12 months. I will add a smoothness value to flag for passenger cars. commented 2026-10-16 16:14:31 UTC by MappingJunkie ♦11 |
| 190105137 (Comments: 1) | YouthNys (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Youth, Can you tell me where there is a flat edge that crosses over the 14th green? Was there some mistake where a bunch of nodes got deleted, leaving a long straight line? Here's a link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156559... commented 2026-10-16 16:08:26 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
 | 189668384 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 112) | Moi, muutin nimen Katriinaksi. Luulin kirjoittaneeni silloin sen kahdella i:llä, mutta en ollut näköjään tehnytkään niin. Kiitos kun huomasit commented 2026-10-16 15:58:36 UTC by liljaadeliina ♦76 |
 | 190480122 (Comments: 1) | Tresunocuatrodos (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola. Hay varias direcciones borradas. No existen? También hay informaciones copiadas en los predios y edificios. salu2 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190480122 ... commented 2026-10-16 15:54:30 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 163786865 (Comments: 4) | EinEngener (Discussed changesets: 139) | Well, the situation is a bit more complex: The Hegau mountains used to show volcanic activities, here are the details: https://lgrbwissen.lgrb-bw.de/geotourismus/landschaftsteile-felsen/alpenvorland/hegau-vulkane So, the mountains furth... commented 2026-10-16 15:52:34 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 190602002 (Comments: 1) | sjrowla4 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bore da Please can you explain exactly what the routing issues you are trying to solve, for what mode of transport and what router. Please also bear in mind that routing changes take a minimum of two days to take effect. Diolch Phil (Data Wo... commented 2026-10-16 15:49:04 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,864 |
| 145847887 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 183) | Dear Claudius Henrichs, can you specify the source of the Rabigh Solar PV Park you have added in this changeset. You have given ESRI World Imagery as a source, but the name, operator, and wattage of a plant can hardly be determined from imagery so th... commented 2026-10-16 15:43:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190523747 (Comments: 1) | Ardiccio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao, i tag dei percorsi escursionistici vanno inseriti nelle relazioni non nelle way. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI inoltre esite già una relazione per il percorso 707 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/123007... commented 2026-10-16 15:35:12 UTC by Andrea Del Sarto ♦89 |
| 190596503 (Comments: 7) | Young Bosch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Beste eggie, Als eerste: excuus, dat bord had ik nooit gezien, de kaarten van mijn auto kent de weg als Boshovenring, die begint een beetje minder betrouwbaar te worden, en bedankt om te laten weten dat ik niet Google Street View mag gebruiken... commented 2026-10-16 15:25:06 UTC by Young Bosch ♦2 |
| 190474987 (Comments: 1) | jcrada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks jcrada for adding to the map. Just wanted to reach out real quick and let you know that you shouldn't "name" these tree areas when there is no official name (like a plaque or nametag of some sort). Thanks. commented 2026-10-16 15:24:50 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
| 190607895 (Comments: 3) | Mex (Discussed changesets: 22) | Fair enough, I was just passing through the area fixing some notes and noticed they had already been added :) If I have the time tomorrow I'll fix it if you haven't done so before I get to it commented 2026-10-16 15:21:45 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦15 |
| 190460617 (Comments: 1) | berrymandj (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey Berry, just wanted to reach out and let you know that you are duplicating existing features. Instead of modifying them, you are creating a second feature that lies on top of an existing feature. It is best to modify existing work if at all possib... commented 2026-10-16 15:21:29 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
| 190596348 (Comments: 4) | Young Bosch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke, Maar we zetten in principe geen wegen op access=no Routeren doet het daar nu toch niet als doorgaande weg. Wegen die tijdelijk zijn afgesloten taggen we met access:conditional= no @ ( tijdvak) Hier is het wel bijzonder want alle... commented 2026-10-16 15:20:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190608114 (Comments: 1) | szstan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ten niepełny adres co ma oznaczać? commented 2026-10-16 15:17:07 UTC by Szymson ♦561 |
 | 188725924 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | Additional tags have since been added in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190612832#map=17/25.790715/-100.178543. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 15:16:05 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
 | 190479510 (Comments: 2) | Bagasputra05 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190581649. commented 2026-10-16 15:14:32 UTC by 4TL4S ♦12 |
| 188687406 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The missed segments have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190612721#map=19/25.686877/-100.165256. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 15:13:51 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
| 190531564 (Comments: 3) | Bagasputra05 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190581614. commented 2026-10-16 15:13:41 UTC by 4TL4S ♦12 |
| 190592624 (Comments: 2) | Achmad Alqadri (Discussed changesets: 5) | Mohon dipahami kembali komentar sebelumnya https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190432879. Jangan gunakan geometri sungai dan jalan untuk dimasukkan ke dalam relasi batas admin. 👎 commented 2026-10-16 15:13:38 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 188687169 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The missed segments have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190612627#map=19/25.702036/-100.142834. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 15:12:11 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
| 190594472 (Comments: 1) | Apay00 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Terima kasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan, koreksi letak bangunan, menambahkan jalan/bangunan, menghapus jalan/bangunan 🤗 commented 2026-10-16 15:06:51 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 188689282 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The missed segment has since been tagged in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190612117#map=19/25.703444/-100.239611. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 15:02:31 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
| 190607112 (Comments: 7) | TheScarletPuntNL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb het als bovenstaand aangepast .. anders impossible oneway. Bron.. Beelden Mapilary dec 2025 / voorjaar 2026. Vanaf Rotonde Admiraal van Ghentstraat oneway=yes en G11 tagging. Oneway richting bromfietsdoorsteek omgedraaid. Rest G12a b... commented 2026-10-16 14:59:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 188577206 (Comments: 2) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The remaining wrongly tagged segments have additionally been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190611951#map=16/25.67269/-100.39093. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 14:59:19 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
| 188581492 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The missed segment has since been tagged in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190611765#map=19/25.697831/-100.325024. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 14:54:24 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
 | 190576925 (Comments: 2) | rui228 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Olá António. Agradeço a mensagem. Levarei o comentário em consideração. Boas edições. Cumprimentos, Rui commented 2026-10-16 14:49:53 UTC by rui228 ♦44 |
| 188580665 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The missed segment has since been tagged in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190611307#map=19/25.728497/-100.368910. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 14:45:16 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
| 188578721 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The missed segment has since been tagged in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190611181#map=19/25.671555/-100.356125. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 14:42:54 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
| 188577484 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The wrongly tagged segments have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190610978. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 14:39:42 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
| 188585975 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 215) | The wrongly tagged segments have since been removed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190610695. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-10-16 14:35:22 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦178 |
| 187990153 (Comments: 1) | caesaraix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je vous prie de bien vouloir noter que l'attribut building=hangar ne concerne que des installations aéronautiques, et jamais des "hangars" agricoles comme en français. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR... commented 2026-10-16 14:13:23 UTC by zorglubu ♦366 |
| 190542828 (Comments: 1) | wusluf (Discussed changesets: 2) | ich hab dir schonmal geschrieben, dass dies keine testumgebung für deine app ist. Lass es bitte --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190542828 ... commented 2026-10-16 14:11:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190548522 (Comments: 1) | Alida66 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi :) thanks for moving the Trekkingplätze to the proper spot. Please have a look at charge=* and how we tag currency. safe travels :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/cha... commented 2026-10-16 14:09:12 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190603401 (Comments: 1) | Hypoknosimus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi :) So ein Zahnarzt hat idR nur den Namen der lokalen Sprache. Es ist also erstens völlig ausreichend das Feld name=* korrekt zu füllen. Da wir in DE sind ist das name:de=* überflüssig und name:en=* ist falsch, da wir nic... commented 2026-10-16 14:03:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
 | 158753428 (Comments: 4) | EightMegs (Discussed changesets: 4) | I went to the site today, but was only able to walk around the perimeter because of brambles. It does not give tumulus vibes at all, I would not be surprised if it wasn't in fact a quarry which would tally with the changing shape in the differen... commented 2026-10-16 14:00:45 UTC by b-unicycling ♦306 |
| 190582619 (Comments: 1) | Khawê Vitor (Discussed changesets: 16) | reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190608766 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190582619 commented 2026-10-16 14:00:24 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190575972 (Comments: 1) | Dieselfox (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, was it intentional to tag the entire Foynes branch as a bridge? It seems unlikely for this to be accurate. commented 2026-10-16 13:49:51 UTC by Swedneck ♦12 |
| 190590914 (Comments: 1) | 7tonin (Discussed changesets: 16) | Dans cette modification, j'ai aussi cherché à rendre trouvable le lieu La Forge. Nommé d'après un ancien bar, et une encore plus vieille activité à l'abord immédiat de la partie bar. La ... commented 2026-10-16 13:42:40 UTC by 7tonin ♦29 |
| 190603024 (Comments: 1) | Wolfpig (Discussed changesets: 2) | Das hier hat auch zu einer routingänderung geführt ( So hab ich den gefunden ) Rot alt - grün neu https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1349140,1354668#52.19627,8.58989,15z Hier die ganze Benachrichtigung https://g... commented 2026-10-16 13:42:07 UTC by flohoff ♦2,612 |
| 188388191 (Comments: 7) | XD346 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190607739 commented 2026-10-16 13:40:08 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 167347901 (Comments: 3) | ejp (Discussed changesets: 11) | Excuus, de vorige opmerking hoort bij mijn changeset 190607112, niet bij deze. commented 2026-10-16 13:38:31 UTC by TheScarletPuntNL ♦2 |
| 190560064 (Comments: 1) | CrstblS (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hola. Para conjuntos de árboles y arbustos, que si bien pueden ser tupidos, pero no clasifican como bosque, usar scrub (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=scrub) Hay algunos acá que da la idea que no son precisamente bos... commented 2026-10-16 13:32:04 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190573211 (Comments: 2) | PatDHE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opps, thanks for catching that! commented 2026-10-16 13:25:43 UTC by PatDHE ♦1 |
| 190578560 (Comments: 1) | timothy_e (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! Please replace by footway=link so we can route directly to the main access point for playgrounds ans sport pitches. commented 2026-10-16 13:21:11 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦553 |
| 190596079 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 32) | Don't move points wildly. Created new points, and change their names. commented 2026-10-16 13:19:10 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 188561675 (Comments: 1) | frspp import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Demolished buildings re-added atop was:building=* -polygons (and other obviously non-building polygons)! See e.g. building=yes added atop a was:building=kindergarten -polygon and a new leisure=pitch polygon in Drumsö Lågstadieskola. |
| 189453788 (Comments: 1) | T-Bush (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! A körforgalmak nem sima egyirányú utak, hanem címkézésük junction=roundabout. Üdv: Ákos commented 2026-10-16 13:11:40 UTC by itineris ♦437 |
| 190598123 (Comments: 1) | Steve Bamelis (Discussed changesets: 1) | google is geen maatstaf om zaken toe te voegen. Deze is copyright beschermd en osm mag daar niet uit overnemen zoals jij nu deed. Geopunt mag wel, of persoonlijk nazien te velde met naambordjes. commented 2026-10-16 13:11:25 UTC by Jakka ♦1,883 |
 | 170864919 (Comments: 2) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 21) | Majú to tak na ich mape, tak neviem https://img.bigeron.com//Myto_pod_Dumbierom_2019_XXX.jpg https://www.kopeczabavy.sk/sk/lyzovanie commented 2026-10-16 13:10:31 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦56 |
| 190576766 (Comments: 1) | Cris Alt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Borraste un bunker. no existe? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190576766 commented 2026-10-16 13:09:47 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190576891 (Comments: 1) | Cris Alt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Cris. Borraste calles completas, árboles y otros elementos. por favor, cuidado con las ediciones. La edición fue revertida --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2026-10-16 13:06:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190535548 (Comments: 4) | danuntu (Discussed changesets: 2) | They're already gone. The default/standard map is made of pre-rendered tiles. It can take a little bit before they update, especially since your computer has some of them cached. You can speed it up by clearing your browser's cache and forc... commented 2026-10-16 13:05:33 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦50 |
| 130576225 (Comments: 3) | streckenkundler (Discussed changesets: 90) | Hei, oh... das ist ja schon ein paar Jahre her...aus eigener Erfahung weiß ich, daß sich solche Beschilderung gerne mal ändern... Da hier auch Fahrradknotenpunktnetze betroffen sind: das Prüftool kennst du? https://www.kn... commented 2026-10-16 12:59:49 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,201 |
| 190605158 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 33) | Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189971599, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189971215, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189970413, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189969589, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-10-16 12:50:42 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 190604722 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 33) | Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189987521, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189987448, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189987202, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189986858, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-10-16 12:41:56 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 190601916 (Comments: 3) | Wolfpig (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich fahre da jede Woche mindestens 1 mal lang weil ich hier wohne. Kann sein das es kürzer her ist seit dem die 70 Erweitert wurden, aber es ist garantiert mehr als 1 Jahr so. commented 2026-10-16 12:41:02 UTC by Wolfpig ♦1 |
| 190602734 (Comments: 3) | Kees Bruijnes (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted by changeset #190604592 commented 2026-10-16 12:38:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190561118 (Comments: 2) | DerSchmopf (Discussed changesets: 14) | Danke für deinen Hinweis, da hab ich mich wohl verklickt. Habe es jetzt korrigt. commented 2026-10-16 12:37:55 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦10 |
| 190334407 (Comments: 1) | Seb Zen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Il me semble que nous avons un désaccord dont nous devrions discuter. Je cartographie souvent les trottoirs en chemins explicites (highway=footway + footway=sidewalk). Dans ce cas, l'attribut sidewalk sur la rue elle-mêm... commented 2026-10-16 12:35:42 UTC by oldnab ♦12 |
| 190601326 (Comments: 2) | Kees Bruijnes (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted by changeset #190604333 commented 2026-10-16 12:34:01 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190601945 (Comments: 2) | Kees Bruijnes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Alle wegdelen lagen los van elkaar. Ik heb het hersteld. commented 2026-10-16 12:32:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190600074 (Comments: 1) | Max_0404 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-16 12:24:02 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190596821 (Comments: 2) | Ndoll1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ahh Dit bericht had je al... commented 2026-10-16 12:23:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
 | 190479535 (Comments: 1) | binankadakadsa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190600906 commented 2026-10-16 12:22:55 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
 | 190507030 (Comments: 1) | Leman's Deli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190600723 commented 2026-10-16 12:22:11 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190596715 (Comments: 1) | Ndoll1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Ownership=private is geen beschreven tag in de wiki. We kennen wel access=private. Het ligt er ook een beetje aa... commented 2026-10-16 12:21:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190483695 (Comments: 1) | K4ji_hud@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190601632 commented 2026-10-16 12:21:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 181086498 (Comments: 2) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 254) | Ik weet het niet. Dit stukje wordt in de BGT zo genoemd. Ik heb dat uit de BGT overgenomen. Pas het aan naar behoeven, zou ik zeggen Groet, Dick van den Hoven commented 2026-10-16 12:21:13 UTC by dvdhoven ♦997 |
| 190479562 (Comments: 1) | binankadakadsa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190595728 commented 2026-10-16 12:20:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
 | 190503561 (Comments: 1) | Milka Harold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190595365 commented 2026-10-16 12:19:58 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
 | 190493549 (Comments: 1) | handscrochet0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190595006 commented 2026-10-16 12:19:05 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190495607 (Comments: 1) | taupe680 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190594822 commented 2026-10-16 12:18:36 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
 | 190575028 (Comments: 1) | Veskee (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190603435 commented 2026-10-16 12:15:57 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190603365 (Comments: 1) | vietnam321 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Its correct name is Acacia Prison, my bad. commented 2026-10-16 12:14:29 UTC by vietnam321 ♦24 |
| 190528405 (Comments: 8) | sjrowla4 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good afternoon. In general full updates depends on the router, but in general it take between a few days and a month for a full update. Getting a new data dump, preprocessing the data and building the network graphs, and then hosting that takes time. commented 2026-10-16 12:11:17 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦15 |
| 190561083 (Comments: 1) | ahmet enes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190603167 commented 2026-10-16 12:09:33 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
 | 190602839 (Comments: 1) | Eeladona (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it looks like this is part of an organized edit. Could you please provide a link to the wiki page documenting this edit? I'm looking for a link to the community consultation. Thanks commented 2026-10-16 12:04:28 UTC by pnorman ♦339 |
| 190600682 (Comments: 1) | SanidinKhe (Discussed changesets: 5) | Guten Tag, wenn die Wege inzwischen tracktype=grade1 sind, dann passt surface=compacted vermutlich nicht mehr? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318564331 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318565440 Viele Grüße whb commented 2026-10-16 11:54:52 UTC by whb ♦673 |
| 190520919 (Comments: 2) | Corsa5 (Discussed changesets: 160) | because this tag means that the train is maintained in its current condition due to its historical value (mainly for tourists), and not because there is no money to upgrade the crumbling infrastructure commented 2026-10-16 11:53:10 UTC by Corsa5 ♦10 |
| 190199419 (Comments: 7) | moaxed (Discussed changesets: 17) | "someone with local knowledge" This is, why 4 km north around Åträsket, there is more detailed landuse. ;-) I will follow the empty spaces. commented 2026-10-16 11:52:40 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦66 |
| 173624088 (Comments: 1) | Teleborian (Discussed changesets: 14) | ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13249811829 der bereits vorhandene Stein der 1000 Gedanken gemeint? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12498072023 commented 2026-10-16 11:49:57 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190601621 (Comments: 1) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 19) | Connected road lines according images of Bing Maps Aerial --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190601621 commented 2026-10-16 11:49:31 UTC by squeaker_andrus ♦20 |
| 190597205 (Comments: 2) | joektn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus, Dezimaltrenner wurden korrigiert von Komma auf Punkt. commented 2026-10-16 11:27:20 UTC by joektn ♦1 |
| 190574389 (Comments: 1) | Thomas der Erste (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, grundsätzlich ist "L12" kein Name sondern eine Referenz (ref=*), genauso wie auch A4 kein Name ist. Außerdem verläuft die L12 gar nicht hier, sondern in Richtung Langerwehe. Rückgängig gemacht mit https:/... commented 2026-10-16 11:25:45 UTC by aixbrick ♦946 |
| 190551718 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | So could be `=hotel` + `hotel=guest_house` (+ `stars=0` + `supervised=no` etc), or at least some `guest_house=` eg `=hotel` if kept. Can add `designation:en=Guesthouse (General)` for the licence. Some are still named hotels. Many only renamed aft... commented 2026-10-16 11:07:54 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190576009 (Comments: 1) | onethreethreeone (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190600352 commented 2026-10-16 11:07:12 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 185191303 (Comments: 3) | SamBouwer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks you - your fixes look correct to me commented 2026-10-16 11:01:06 UTC by tomhukins ♦306 |
| 186761952 (Comments: 1) | Mattschoe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, jeg har fjernet Øresundshjemmet, da det allerede er kortlagt som et område. :) commented 2026-10-16 11:01:06 UTC by Vi2727 ♦29 |
 | 190457621 (Comments: 1) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 22) | cc @CoyKoi commented 2026-10-16 11:00:57 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦513 |
| 190576878 (Comments: 2) | MWillems (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dit is een privé kapel, maar maakt deel uit van het Adornesdomein en er is wel degelijk bezoek mogelijk. Het is wel betalend aangezien het ook verbonden is aan het Adorneshuis, het museum, de Pieterszalen enz... commented 2026-10-16 10:56:55 UTC by MWillems ♦1 |
| 189708748 (Comments: 1) | corz23 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Is addr:apts supposed to be addr:flats=* on way/161618498 and way/161618947 ? commented 2026-10-16 10:35:13 UTC by Joel Koen ♦103 |
| 190365591 (Comments: 2) | Rene1972 (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK no reponse, paths now mapped as per imagery and HA map. commented 2026-10-16 10:33:20 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,398 |
| 190238872 (Comments: 2) | Senihtu (Discussed changesets: 58) | ok. das wusste ich nicht. Dann müssten die betroffenen Busrelationen noch angepasst werden. Machst Du das oder soll ich es tun? auf gute Zusammenarbeit! commented 2026-10-16 10:31:07 UTC by Senihtu ♦205 |
| 190540752 (Comments: 1) | 309_308_307 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi! Wenn Du Dich in der Gegend auskennst, dann überprüfe nochmal die Beschilderung/Das Tagging der Straße an der Bushaltestelle am HSK-Haupteingang. Derzeit ist dort motor_vehicle=no eingetragen - dann dürfte der Bus da gar... commented 2026-10-16 10:23:28 UTC by Senihtu ♦205 |
| 190088397 (Comments: 2) | maryjoggins (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Tux67, danke fürs Nachbearbeiten der beiden anderen Änderungen. Die dritte Änderung kann gelöscht werden, denn dieser Weg ist frei passierbar, ohne Schild, Zaun. Ich hatte einen anderen Weg markiert in Houverath???? Gruss Ma... commented 2026-10-16 10:21:03 UTC by maryjoggins ♦1 |
| 190598336 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 33) | Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190282258, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190282116, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190281969, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190279086, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-10-16 10:19:21 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
 | 190542561 (Comments: 1) | Hanh Vo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190598124 commented 2026-10-16 10:14:48 UTC by MappingMore ♦773 |
| 188493361 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 51) | Bonjour, le lien Twitter n'est pas bon, c'est celui du Bon Coin. Le SIRET n'est pas bon non plus, il correspond à un établissement fermé. commented 2026-10-16 10:14:42 UTC by Syl ♦1,124 |
 | 189101623 (Comments: 1) | Ranecr77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | please provide arguments for renaming "name = Черняховського вулиця" to "name = 3". Or fix it if it was mistake. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173630629/ commented 2026-10-16 10:13:54 UTC by ququruzka ♦209 |
 | 190585450 (Comments: 1) | Druid_vrn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Druid_vrn, thank you for your contribution in China. However, osm is an open-source map that availiable for everyone, so you are expected to use local name in the name tag, and add other language name in name:xx. For example, if you don't kno... commented 2026-10-16 10:11:04 UTC by smallCat ♦30 |
| 190562793 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | Iterative refinement. Repurposed; see https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1866468-20260817.htm to become access=no , bus=permit , minibus=permit commented 2026-10-16 10:09:32 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦229 |
| 190597734 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 33) | Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190438196, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190436857, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190436757, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190436404, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-10-16 10:08:27 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 190590823 (Comments: 1) | JerzyUrban (Discussed changesets: 20) | wypadało by nie przyklejać landuse do powerline commented 2026-10-16 10:07:35 UTC by Yog Sot ♦585 |
| 190559147 (Comments: 2) | Pawelaa (Discussed changesets: 25) | Well, there are parts of Burghead to Hopeman line that are no longer existing due to cliff colapse, yet marked as abandoned railway. commented 2026-10-16 10:05:50 UTC by Pawelaa ♦5 |
| 190554094 (Comments: 2) | Alexa3r (Discussed changesets: 2) | Da zapravo je Arcibalda Rajsa, sada sam proverio na RGZ i ja. Na planplus.rs je pisalo Generala Trenijea pa sam odatle samo prepisao. Hvala na ispravci commented 2026-10-16 09:56:21 UTC by Alexa3r ♦2 |
| 190596902 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 33) | Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190518996, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190518762, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190518006, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190517856, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-10-16 09:51:05 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 190511827 (Comments: 3) | ludozz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dankjewel voor de tip! commented 2026-10-16 09:48:23 UTC by ludozz ♦5 |
| 190592122 (Comments: 1) | VEZA_97 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravím, Vaše úprava zřejmě pomohla u této adresy ( viz technické detaily: https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=2757557174&class=place ) Nicméně zd&aac... commented 2026-10-16 09:42:30 UTC by Piskvor ♦521 |
| 190589159 (Comments: 1) | Obi_Madhu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hast du die Änderung des Namens mit alternativen Quellen geprüft? Der note war anonym, und es gab schon Fälle wo anonyme nutzer falsche Informationen in den notes verbreitet haben. Außerdem wäre es für die Rü... commented 2026-10-16 09:38:05 UTC by Tatfahren ♦393 |
| 189508795 (Comments: 18) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | To clarify for myself, my perspective is on the prohibition. Road services facility is only a subset. Other `access=private` is examined together. commented 2026-10-16 09:37:20 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 188295727 (Comments: 1) | multimodaal (Discussed changesets: 87) | Multimodaal, Er stond ook al eerder een minder compleet vlak Landgoed Noetselenberg getekend. Dat is overbodig geworden en 'vervuild' OSM door de extra lijnen die dicht op elkaar komen te staan. Overigens, dit soort vlaklijnen niet met w... commented 2026-10-16 09:36:14 UTC by Op'tRad ♦73 |
| 190595136 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello, Is there any added value of adding ice_cream=yes on a POI which is already tagged as amenity=ice_cream ? It looks like you tried to mechanically reimport tags from your previous edit (where you had failed to update the main featu... commented 2026-10-16 09:31:04 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 190561339 (Comments: 2) | samho1234567 (Discussed changesets: 38) | +1 commented 2026-10-16 09:28:07 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
 | 190589909 (Comments: 1) | taketaketake (Discussed changesets: 41) | こんにちは。この道、地理院地図だと県道扱いになってるみたいですよ。 commented 2026-10-16 09:28:05 UTC by IshikawaJun ♦9 |
| 190595780 (Comments: 1) | IshikawaJun (Discussed changesets: 7) | こんにちは。この道、地理院地図だと県道扱いになってるみたいですよ。 commented 2026-10-16 09:27:34 UTC by IshikawaJun ♦9 |
| 176066615 (Comments: 3) | yetzt (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks. The thing is that it's still a poke place, however without an apparent name. commented 2026-10-16 09:25:12 UTC by ilcuoco57 ♦6 |
 | 190583530 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 274) | 明德樓-教室編號（地址）14272443773～14272443781等圖徵不應刪除，此些資料來自於國立新竹高級中學校內地圖，請複查及復原 commented 2026-10-16 09:22:30 UTC by Hsinchu Map ♦2 |
 | 190551989 (Comments: 2) | MarinoBM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Nada de eso. Lo normal es que contestes al comentario que se te hace en el en el conjunto de cambios y des las explicaciones que creas oportunas. Continúo allí. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190395353#map=17/41.633548/... commented 2026-10-16 09:22:27 UTC by MarinoBM ♦186 |
| 190395353 (Comments: 2) | Valario127 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Las administraciones enseguida se dan autobombo sobre “posibles proyectos” y pueden demorarse mucho si es que llegan a ser una realidad. Analizando el fondo de la noticia, lo único tangible que encuentro es que los terrenos pasan a... commented 2026-10-16 09:22:17 UTC by MarinoBM ♦186 |
| 190569009 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 274) | 圖徵1568502615不應刪除 commented 2026-10-16 09:18:53 UTC by Hsinchu Map ♦2 |
 | 190553127 (Comments: 1) | sky vision (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190594923 commented 2026-10-16 09:10:17 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190594539 (Comments: 1) | Guillem Arias Fauste (Discussed changesets: 1) | Comment missing from the upload: tags left-hand running on Madrid–Hendaya, Collado Villalba–El Escorial (railway:preferred_direction=forward, each track drawn in its direction of travel), as Torrelodones–Villalba already is. Source:... commented 2026-10-16 09:07:32 UTC by Guillem Arias Fauste ♦1 |
| 164831710 (Comments: 6) | JanerNaKole (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://i.imgur.com/1fsF81K.png commented 2026-10-16 09:06:27 UTC by JanerNaKole ♦18 |
| 190569405 (Comments: 1) | Miguel Angel Limachi Choque (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190594628 commented 2026-10-16 09:05:15 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190184905 (Comments: 3) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 658) | though admittedly this edit message is not great, maybe I will ask Osm.Org Tags Editor author to make it a bit smarter commented 2026-10-16 09:04:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 178228126 (Comments: 2) | MaN aRa (Discussed changesets: 3) | più che altro, direi che la rimozione è in evidente conflitto con una edizione recente, di solo due mesi antecedente, basata su 'survey'. e poi, le etichette ci sono già: sac_scale\talpine_hiking trail_visibility\... commented 2026-10-16 08:59:41 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,911 |
 | 190594331 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 146) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 190582346, 190582388, 190582432. commented 2026-10-16 08:55:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190582346 (Comments: 1) | Kaafiye kaalin (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190594331 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-10-16 08:55:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190582432 (Comments: 1) | Kaafiye kaalin (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190594331 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-10-16 08:55:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190582388 (Comments: 1) | Kaafiye kaalin (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190594331 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-10-16 08:55:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 186794984 (Comments: 2) | helleagle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ähm. Oben falsches Copy-Paste. Eigentlicher Hinweis: Offensichtlich ist zwischenzeitlich die Brücke wieder errichtet worden, nachdem ich letztes Jahr ohne Ankündigung der Baustelle an der Strecke vor dem Graben ohne Brüc... commented 2026-10-16 08:53:23 UTC by Steube ♦49 |
| 190571785 (Comments: 3) | lxndrl (Discussed changesets: 7) | I've had some websites reject requests that lack tracking, so even if there is no reason some still do... I do agree that the tracking params should be removed but if it results in an error then might well remove the whole url. I'd prob... commented 2026-10-16 08:53:03 UTC by gpserror ♦253 |
| 190550223 (Comments: 2) | anshanin (Discussed changesets: 11) | Zdravo, Da, hvala na zapažanju. To je bila greška. Revert changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190593980 commented 2026-10-16 08:50:54 UTC by anshanin ♦33 |
| 137665455 (Comments: 1) | DaveF (Discussed changesets: 183) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5582926 ? Is it also not actually a life ring as case discovered thanks to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5321279 ? commented 2026-10-16 08:50:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 188839337 (Comments: 1) | AudioApe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just changing the address of an embassy doesn't help. You also have to move the node to the corresponding location. commented 2026-10-16 08:49:36 UTC by wolfbert ♦207 |
| 190575457 (Comments: 1) | jajanja3 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Looks good thank you. You could consider building=house house=detached Regards, and thanks for the contribution. Nick commented 2026-10-16 08:44:08 UTC by Tallguy ♦25 |
| 190592767 (Comments: 1) | rmwiltvank (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-16 08:43:34 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 17560879 (Comments: 1) | Ziltoidium (Discussed changesets: 10) | Halle Ziltoidum! Ich weiß, der CS ist schon sehr alt, aber den Fehler den Du damals gemacht hast, war immer noch in OSM. Die Gehwege, die du als separate Linie eingetragen hast, waren nicht oder zu wenig mit den Fahrbahnen und anderen Wegen ... commented 2026-10-16 08:40:43 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦844 |
| 189312688 (Comments: 3) | MaN aRa (Discussed changesets: 3) | maritomo, se hai un dubbio chiedi all' autore per confrontarti, è educazione. Al massimo doveva aggoungere i tag corretti, non cancellarmi il path. Non mi sono preso 10 zecche per farmi cancellare il mio lavoro! 😅😆😂 commented 2026-10-16 08:32:40 UTC by Gh0stz0x ♦354 |
| 190491511 (Comments: 1) | JSR5000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190592963 commented 2026-10-16 08:28:35 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190588493 (Comments: 1) | andwil (Discussed changesets: 9) | Mal wieder ein Dankeschön fürs abarbeiten meiner uralten Hinweise! commented 2026-10-16 08:25:57 UTC by 0xb7767000 ♦28 |
 | 190515069 (Comments: 2) | iakobi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks, will keep in mind commented 2026-10-16 08:22:47 UTC by iakobi ♦2 |
 | 185899701 (Comments: 1) | UNGSC - Dimitrios (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello UNGSC - Dimitrios, Please consider adding "access=private" tags to the gates leading into the UNDOF camps instead of tagging all the roads and paths in them with "access=private". Other than reducing the mappin... commented 2026-10-16 08:20:16 UTC by zstadler ♦1,153 |
| 89964428 (Comments: 3) | wh_LT (Discussed changesets: 7) | ich habe die nodes nun auf Kreuzungen verschoben und in der description eine Erklärung hinterlegt; die Kreuzungen sind jedenfalls (zumindest die ref=*) so beschildert und die name sind jedenfalls lokal bekannt; was wäre aus eurer Sicht noch... commented 2026-10-16 08:19:35 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 172439241 (Comments: 6) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 53) | dzieki za info! znalazłem później projekt. ogólnie, nie do konca składa się z rzeczywistością commented 2026-10-16 08:17:01 UTC by capt_planet ♦15 |
| 162750693 (Comments: 2) | Thisik (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5582886 commented 2026-10-16 08:09:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190470241 (Comments: 4) | 9783440148426 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ist bereinigt. Änderungssatz: 190591815/190591631/190590880 VG commented 2026-10-16 08:07:08 UTC by pitfire ♦761 |
| 183909610 (Comments: 2) | Fullgas1 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hm, tak opravy alebo reakcie sa asi nedočkám :( https://ibb.co/wNYQL4wm commented 2026-10-16 08:06:21 UTC by Tomas_J ♦430 |
 | 190564209 (Comments: 1) | Jastine Juanico (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190591907 commented 2026-10-16 08:04:19 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 182279643 (Comments: 4) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi Ceirios, thanks for the explanation. To be honest, I'm not familiar with either the filter function you mentioned or the layer with the cadastral boundaries. Where can I find them in the iD? commented 2026-10-16 08:03:52 UTC by North14 ♦23 |
 | 168434018 (Comments: 1) | vonde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why did you add an email address to the ref tag? I reverted those in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190591558 commented 2026-10-16 07:55:58 UTC by eginhard ♦47 |
| 190580619 (Comments: 1) | L Leung (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I think this name fits more as an alt_name. After a quick search, Hángewii seems more of an official name in navajo: https://promotions.hu/orszagos/tech-tudomany/2024/05/30/uj-nev-indian-magyarorszag-masodik-vilaghaboru This name... commented 2026-10-16 07:53:54 UTC by qstep ♦282 |
| 86878039 (Comments: 2) | wh_LT (Discussed changesets: 7) | yes, it is for avalanche blasting; a small aerialway; https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawinenausl%C3%B6sung_mit_einer_Seilbahn https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lawinensprengbahn/90037 commented 2026-10-16 07:35:15 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190569099 (Comments: 2) | Daniel1777 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sorry. Ich bin dort regelmäßig unterwegs und habe mir zur Aufgabe gemacht, die Karte ‚aufzuräumen‘. Ich korrigiere Abweichungen der Verläufe, die manchmal einfach falsch sind und lösche nicht existierende Wege bz... commented 2026-10-16 07:28:07 UTC by Daniel1777 ♦3 |
| 190311318 (Comments: 1) | NLBRT (Discussed changesets: 4) | Needed local knowledge to fix this! commented 2026-10-16 07:25:10 UTC by frozenrabi ♦39 |
| 190568941 (Comments: 2) | Daniel1777 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dort wachsen Büsche und Bäume, sodass es unmöglich ist dort langzugehen. Da ist eine ehemalige Kiesgrube zu einem Feuchtbiotop geworden. Und der nördliche Teil des Abschnitts war nie ein Weg. Das ist ein Sandberg. commented 2026-10-16 07:24:43 UTC by Daniel1777 ♦3 |
| 189012331 (Comments: 4) | JMJB (Discussed changesets: 30) | Just a note. There was a question on forum ceske dalnice. According to reply, this part will be marked as I/57: „ I/35 od Lipníka po Makov úplně zanikne, na úseku D48 - ValMez ji nahradí I/57 a od ValMezu po ... commented 2026-10-16 07:24:28 UTC by Marián Kyral ♦88 |
| 190465656 (Comments: 5) | gallseife (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi gallseife, das überzeugt mich nicht ganz. ;-) Ich habe mal im Forum nachgefragt: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/frage-an-die-eisenbahn-mapper-namen-von-stellwerken/148868 commented 2026-10-16 07:23:05 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦844 |
| 190586587 (Comments: 1) | da_real (Discussed changesets: 3) | Guten Morgen 👋! Zitat aus barrier=gate: "Vermeide es, das Tor auf eine Kreuzung von Wegen zu setzen, da dann nicht klar ist, für welchen Weg der Eintrag zutrifft." Happy Mapping! Andreas commented 2026-10-16 07:19:00 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦214 |
| 190489848 (Comments: 1) | rochioooooio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190590002 commented 2026-10-16 07:17:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190585872 (Comments: 1) | maxcoservices (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welocme to OSM! I reverted your entry, becaus he has no address (and additional unkown keys). If you need help you are welcome. commented 2026-10-16 07:16:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,887 |
| 190556319 (Comments: 3) | Kliniek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je geeft aan note =comsetische kliniek Spelfout? De naam van de kliniek? Ga svp de naam na en de functie en voeg die toe aan de adresnode. Nu was er schade aan de kaart ontstaan. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-16 07:15:57 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
 | 190493328 (Comments: 1) | mahbublimon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190589886 commented 2026-10-16 07:14:04 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190305123 (Comments: 3) | uvi (Discussed changesets: 28) | Danke für die Rückmeldung. Ich habe mit changeset/190589704 revertiert. Viele Grüße, Joachim commented 2026-10-16 07:12:15 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,469 |
| 190588595 (Comments: 1) | RudolphFroger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Rudolf, Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-16 07:07:20 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190589369 (Comments: 1) | Federico851 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Attenzione potrebbero attribuire numeri civici separati ad altri accessi dello stesso immobile, ma ciò al momento non è verificabile. Il numero 30 è quello dell'accesso principale, fronte strada. commented 2026-10-16 07:04:42 UTC by Federico851 ♦4 |
| 190589085 (Comments: 1) | 🅱 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Theres a new flock camera on northbound decatur blvd right after the hacienda intersection. Dont know who owns it but most likely lv metro pd commented 2026-10-16 07:01:38 UTC by 🅱 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 ♦1 |
| 190555641 (Comments: 2) | Tomasz Herud (Discussed changesets: 23) | Tylko, że ten teren tylko odrobinę pokrywał się z terenem gdzie jest sklep sportowy. To już lepiej byłoby płot przerobić z 'line' na 'area' i dodać mu tagi laduse=retail commented 2026-10-16 06:57:18 UTC by Tomasz Herud ♦49 |
| 190411731 (Comments: 1) | Adrialandia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Adrialandia! Could you please let me know if these new roads are part of a specific project? I cannot find any visual confirmation for them on satellite imagery. If these roads are planned or under construction, please tag them as propos... commented 2026-10-16 06:52:51 UTC by Yuliya_Petrash ♦11 |
 | 190518187 (Comments: 1) | Felix_adjei (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190588786 commented 2026-10-16 06:50:14 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190522613 (Comments: 1) | elllit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190588754 commented 2026-10-16 06:50:09 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 189791408 (Comments: 2) | orycteropus1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Morge habi Du hast natürlich recht... die bessere Lösung! Grüsse christian commented 2026-10-16 06:49:27 UTC by orycteropus1 ♦8 |
| 132825689 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 157) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5582788 ? commented 2026-10-16 06:44:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190374721 (Comments: 1) | Ana Zilli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190586274 commented 2026-10-16 06:41:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190497809 (Comments: 1) | mfrep (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190588481 commented 2026-10-16 06:41:34 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190395139 (Comments: 1) | Vonorovis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190563725 commented 2026-10-16 06:41:09 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190381619 (Comments: 2) | Edisono (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190549373 commented 2026-10-16 06:40:30 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
 | 190479800 (Comments: 1) | PanamaPapa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190588403 commented 2026-10-16 06:39:44 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190400061 (Comments: 4) | hd6631 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ich hatte bei der verfallenen Almhütte schon abandoned:building ergänzt; wenn man noch Reste sieht, könnte man das ruhig lassen; wenn nichts mehr da ist, dann ist es ok wenn sie weg ist commented 2026-10-16 06:37:19 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
 | 190552178 (Comments: 8) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 194) | Върнах промените направо - changeset/190588315 commented 2026-10-16 06:36:16 UTC by Fraxi ♦523 |
 | 190491472 (Comments: 1) | ATSCO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190588198 commented 2026-10-16 06:35:12 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190396736 (Comments: 1) | Andreas Finger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190548863 commented 2026-10-16 06:34:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190387289 (Comments: 2) | hd6631 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Änderungen wurden angepasst. commented 2026-10-16 06:34:30 UTC by hd6631 ♦2 |
| 190575426 (Comments: 1) | mapper_jrs (Discussed changesets: 1) | das Schild gibt es schon https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/848728355 commented 2026-10-16 06:34:18 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190536280 (Comments: 6) | WoSoe (Discussed changesets: 25) | @Pebbles_1 um noch deine Frage »Warum wurde MP von Gebäude I gelöscht? Die Kirche war ausgeschnitten.« zu beantworten. 1. Weil es sich um ein fehlerhaftes MP gehandelt hat. 2. Weil die Kirche zum Gebä... commented 2026-10-16 06:34:06 UTC by WoSoe ♦136 |
| 190497139 (Comments: 1) | Hsinchu Map (Discussed changesets: 6) | 請不要將想像中，非政府規劃的道路畫上去 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190497139 commented 2026-10-16 06:32:55 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,384 |
| 190495363 (Comments: 1) | Hsinchu Map (Discussed changesets: 6) | 請不要將想像中，非政府規劃的道路畫上去 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190495363 commented 2026-10-16 06:32:21 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,384 |
| 190460120 (Comments: 1) | Hsinchu Map (Discussed changesets: 6) | 請不要將想像中，非政府規劃的道路畫上去 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190460120 commented 2026-10-16 06:32:12 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,384 |
| 190459932 (Comments: 1) | Hsinchu Map (Discussed changesets: 6) | 請不要將想像中，非政府規劃的道路畫上去 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190459932 commented 2026-10-16 06:32:05 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,384 |
| 190459697 (Comments: 1) | Hsinchu Map (Discussed changesets: 6) | 請不要將想像中，非政府規劃的道路畫上去 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190459697 commented 2026-10-16 06:31:56 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,384 |
| X | 190578838 (Comments: 1) | xyz32 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190578838 commented 2026-10-16 06:31:42 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
 | 190519093 (Comments: 1) | Hohenheimsenberg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190588051 commented 2026-10-16 06:28:52 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190581830 (Comments: 2) | Sweatyorama (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Sweatyorama, I lived opposite The Barn in Newington Street Enmore and there is no recollection of The Barn so I have deleted it. I also moved the Alpaca place to the correct address. Please follow Nevw's advice and you can reach out here if ... commented 2026-10-16 06:23:28 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦524 |
| 190581315 (Comments: 2) | tubeless (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sebenarnya agak aneh sih, dilihat dari riwayat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6679560598/history/1 kan tugu ini yang menambahkan itu kamu. Jadi dari awal ini pemetaan fiksi? commented 2026-10-16 06:19:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190505221 (Comments: 1) | msal96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190587653 commented 2026-10-16 06:18:37 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190582333 (Comments: 1) | tubeless (Discussed changesets: 5) | Memangnnya beberapa pom bensin di sepanjang Jalan Raya Cibarusah udah gak ada? commented 2026-10-16 06:14:20 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190582001 (Comments: 1) | tubeless (Discussed changesets: 5) | apakah ada alasan kenapa bangunannya pada dihapus? commented 2026-10-16 06:11:53 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190560110 (Comments: 1) | VexVolt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! Now it's correctly deleted commented 2026-10-16 06:09:39 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦336 |
| 179426813 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 304) | Considering how most were named "State Highway xx," one was named "West Highway 52," and the rest were named "Highway 16," which one should I use? If I 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 to switch to road-number-based names, I should at l... commented 2026-10-16 06:02:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦386 |
| 190583930 (Comments: 1) | ShakaAnugerahKarya (Discussed changesets: 1) | kenapa diubah? ini kan jalan tol commented 2026-10-16 05:59:00 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190584282 (Comments: 1) | User0108 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salam, saya sangat menyarankan Anda mencoba Tutorial Interaktif 10–15 menit di iD editor. Cukup klik tombol Edit/Sunting di web OSM, buka menu Bantuan (atau tekan H), lalu pilih Tutorial Interaktif untuk mempelajari cara membuat jalan, area, da... commented 2026-10-16 05:54:28 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
 | 190322391 (Comments: 1) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 129) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190322391 commented 2026-10-16 05:53:46 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190481762 (Comments: 1) | binankadakadsa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190587094 commented 2026-10-16 05:51:41 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190538476 (Comments: 2) | GeeMaps! (Discussed changesets: 12) | Also fixed separately commented 2026-10-16 05:51:16 UTC by GeeMaps! ♦54 |
| 190557201 (Comments: 2) | evgenykatyshev (Discussed changesets: 89) | Sure, fixed, added commented 2026-10-16 05:44:45 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦336 |
| 190407322 (Comments: 1) | gagnstua (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190586918 commented 2026-10-16 05:43:22 UTC by MappingMore ♦773 |
| 190578106 (Comments: 1) | Hedaja (Discussed changesets: 37) | Ridge are Not renderer in 3D You need a roof type commented 2026-10-16 05:26:13 UTC by -karlos- ♦27 |
| 190487269 (Comments: 1) | mahbublimon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190586433 commented 2026-10-16 05:22:10 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190513142 (Comments: 1) | chandra______________________________l (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190586250 commented 2026-10-16 05:11:29 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190470598 (Comments: 2) | in2itivity (Discussed changesets: 7) | This is one that I think we might need to discuss more on the forum! I have a few thoughts on this, and I'm still considering some possible ideas, but in short I am quite hesitant to classify both Granville and Oak as trunks together. I m... commented 2026-10-16 05:08:15 UTC by in2itivity ♦13 |
| 190492411 (Comments: 1) | mahbublimon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190585991 commented 2026-10-16 04:59:49 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190572796 (Comments: 1) | MaykThewessen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi MaykThewessen, De URL van je bron werkt niet (die ook staat in de node zelf), beetje gek omdat het een recente wijziging is. Dus het lijkt er niet op dat je je bron hebt gecontroleerd maar gewoon accepteert wat Codex voorstelt, ik heb dan ... commented 2026-10-16 04:54:45 UTC by Probelnijs ♦18 |
| 190572798 (Comments: 1) | MaykThewessen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi MaykThewessen, De URL van de in deze wijzigingenset toegevoegde "source:generator:type" werkt niet; heb je dit wel gecontroleerd? commented 2026-10-16 04:54:04 UTC by Probelnijs ♦18 |
| 190558667 (Comments: 2) | joebil (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21442 commented 2026-10-16 04:50:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190528575 (Comments: 3) | Fjana (Discussed changesets: 45) | Nn, teď je to v takový situaci ani-ryba-ani-rak, nechme to tak; uvidíme a upravíme podle vývoje OTG commented 2026-10-16 04:46:58 UTC by Piskvor ♦521 |
| 190559129 (Comments: 2) | Openachille (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21441 commented 2026-10-16 04:43:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190559023 (Comments: 1) | Openachille (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - vandalism / fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190585722 commented 2026-10-16 04:42:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190393047 (Comments: 1) | John Doe Asdf (Discussed changesets: 5) | BioKing: Bitte OSM nicht für SEO verwenden. Diese description=* ist für Beschreibungen gedacht, nicht für Werbetexte. Das in image=* angeführte Bild ist opensource? commented 2026-10-16 04:41:14 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190494210 (Comments: 1) | lena husein (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190585649 commented 2026-10-16 04:40:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190564291 (Comments: 2) | nono la terreur (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21440 commented 2026-10-16 04:38:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190564083 (Comments: 1) | nono la terreur (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - vandalism / fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190585565 commented 2026-10-16 04:36:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190558562 (Comments: 2) | lolohitolélé (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21439 commented 2026-10-16 04:33:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190407171 (Comments: 1) | hyprfrmd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410976036 ist kürzlich dokumentiert worden, wo der Zaun steht. node mit barrier=fence wieder angelegt und verschoben. commented 2026-10-16 04:33:24 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190558408 (Comments: 1) | lolohitolélé (Discussed changesets: 7) | DWG revert - vandalism / fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190585480 commented 2026-10-16 04:30:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190449376 (Comments: 1) | oorixx-software (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass das Bild (googleusercontent.com) tatsächlich opensource ist? commented 2026-10-16 04:29:31 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190494127 (Comments: 1) | John Doe Asdf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bitte OSM nicht für SEO verwenden. Diese description=* ist für Beschreibungen gedacht, nicht für Werbetexte. Zudem bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only & in brand=* gehört die Marke, wenn es... commented 2026-10-16 04:26:31 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190494362 (Comments: 1) | John Doe Asdf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bitte OSM nicht für SEO verwenden. Diese description=* ist für Beschreibungen gedacht, nicht für Werbetexte. Zudem bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only & in brand=* gehört die Marke, wenn es... commented 2026-10-16 04:26:29 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190494064 (Comments: 1) | John Doe Asdf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bitte OSM nicht für SEO verwenden. Diese description=* ist für Beschreibungen gedacht, nicht für Werbetexte. Zudem bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only & in brand=* gehört die Marke, wenn es... commented 2026-10-16 04:26:25 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190329067 (Comments: 8) | danuntu (Discussed changesets: 2) | no sorry. no offense taken. and i apologized as well. i am quite new to this platform. and i understand and agree with everything you suggested. i do have questions and ideas, but i'll get the answers in due time. thank you for your patience. i&... commented 2026-10-16 04:23:45 UTC by danuntu ♦2 |
 | 190378507 (Comments: 1) | Leslie Guaraca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190585152 commented 2026-10-16 04:16:29 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190564219 (Comments: 3) | titi le tigre du bingal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21438 commented 2026-10-16 04:09:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190570460 (Comments: 2) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Nur um das mal klarzustellen. amenity=hospital an der Fläche ist der Standard und ist keine Notlösung! Das Problem sind deine »unnötigen« site-Relationen, welche Problem machen. commented 2026-10-16 03:46:35 UTC by WoSoe ♦136 |
 | 173093121 (Comments: 3) | Acimut (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello Mateusz Konieczny, Thank you for reviewing our mappings. I agree with your observations. Could you please provide the coordinates for the node you are referring to? I would fix it if I could locate it, but I am unable to find the node ... commented 2026-10-16 03:42:47 UTC by Acimut ♦13 |
| 190561079 (Comments: 4) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 51) | I'm actually not planning on working on the Colorado Springs area because I've never been there myself; I wouldn't trust myself to map there. Planning on working to the west at this point where I'm much more familiar with the terr... commented 2026-10-16 03:24:29 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦67 |
| 190439064 (Comments: 4) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 320) | I'll be vigilant to do so then, as you've probably noticed there are quite a lot along this southern quadrant that use alternate postcodes commented 2026-10-16 02:58:22 UTC by LachlanWignall ♦2 |
| 190445821 (Comments: 1) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi, I've reverted your edit as it's incorrect. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190583789 You might have tracks from a colleague, but the local mapping community in Burgos is monitoring the construction on this section, and the st... commented 2026-10-16 02:55:42 UTC by cronoser ♦140 |
| 190190071 (Comments: 1) | amtplskaart (Discussed changesets: 24) | OPTICAL OVERRIDE WARNING / SYSTEMIC FAILURE Modifying real-time physical ground-truth (source=survey) using high-latency optical proxies (Mapillary) is a mechanical degradation of spatial data. An elevated edit count does not bend the physical... commented 2026-10-16 02:02:47 UTC by tubeless ♦5 |
| 187397783 (Comments: 1) | dlegg73 (Discussed changesets: 18) | OPTICAL OVERRIDE WARNING / SYSTEMIC FAILURE Modifying real-time physical ground-truth (source=survey) using high-latency optical proxies (Mapillary) is a mechanical degradation of spatial data. An elevated edit count does not bend the physical... commented 2026-10-16 02:00:01 UTC by tubeless ♦5 |
 | 151840391 (Comments: 2) | Florist4880 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5582643 commented 2026-10-16 01:48:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 188010807 (Comments: 2) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hi, apologies for the slow reply as my email has been acting up. You may very well be right that it's still around in some form - I was going based on the imagery. From looking into it further, it seems as though it was levelled at some point as... commented 2026-10-16 01:39:59 UTC by Falsernet ♦153 |
| 190432747 (Comments: 1) | L Leung (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi L Leung, Why did you remove the name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190432747 commented 2026-10-16 01:36:44 UTC by CoyKoi ♦238 |
| 190467055 (Comments: 1) | NaufalFarras (Discussed changesets: 43) | Pangkajene masuk wilayah aglomerasi metropolitan Mamminasatapa, kurang cocok mendapat tag place=city. Begitupun Barru yang menjadi penyangga Kota Parepare commented 2026-10-16 01:06:47 UTC by Achmad Alqadri ♦5 |
| 190059363 (Comments: 3) | yoisho2734 (Discussed changesets: 1) | こんにちは、Glassman。 OSMF Japanのnyampireです。 彼の作業についてはDiscordで協議およびアナウンスがされており、問題ありません。 ご指摘のとおり、OSM wikiへの記載があるべきで... commented 2026-10-16 00:27:22 UTC by nyampire ♦205 |
| 190274020 (Comments: 2) | Swingman7000 (Discussed changesets: 6) | At the very least I would like to restore the river's intermittent area since that appeared to have been mapped correctly. I would at least like to do a partial revert to restore the deleted areas. As far as mapping the intermittent area ... commented 2026-10-16 00:04:31 UTC by Brendan_07 ♦9 |
| 190354267 (Comments: 2) | VeeBack02 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! Thanks for the feedback ☺️ I'll make sure to do so in the future commented 2026-10-15 23:48:18 UTC by VeeBack02 ♦6 |
 | 190280882 (Comments: 1) | MAPNlK (Discussed changesets: 3) | there's already pipeline https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318045334 commented 2026-10-15 23:38:19 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190580036 (Comments: 1) | Abdilahi Abdi Jama (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190580294 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-10-15 23:01:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190580294 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 146) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 190579938, 190580036. commented 2026-10-15 23:01:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190579938 (Comments: 1) | Abdilahi Abdi Jama (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190580294 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-10-15 23:01:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 182338531 (Comments: 4) | Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (Discussed changesets: 87) | What are your plan on fixing damage you caused? commented 2026-10-15 22:50:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190549636 (Comments: 1) | Rtaa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Selamat datang di Openstreetmap. Kamu bisa membuat beberapa bangunan kemudian diunggah, jadi tidak perlu buat satu per satu kemudian diunggah. commented 2026-10-15 22:29:34 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190552942 (Comments: 1) | Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (Discussed changesets: 20) | Sebaiknya tinggalkan cara digitasi yang membuat node/titiknya menjadi sangat banyak. Selain itu, ini semua masuknya ke badan sungai, jadi tidak perlu natural=shingle atau natural=sand. Alam itu dinamis, jadi lebih baik memetakan badan sungainy... commented 2026-10-15 22:25:07 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 187338663 (Comments: 3) | ProvincieAntwerpen_DMOB (Discussed changesets: 2) | ter herinnering commented 2026-10-15 22:23:53 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦284 |
| 190558429 (Comments: 1) | Apay00 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Terima kasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan, koreksi letak bangunan, menambahkan jalan/bangunan, menghapus jalan/bangunan 🤗 commented 2026-10-15 22:19:51 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 158942343 (Comments: 1) | MaN aRa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Conosco BepoPremana ed è del luogo. Se hai un altro GPX puoi usare il plug-in per effettuare la media e migliorare la geometria. Faccio il revert! commented 2026-10-15 21:57:12 UTC by Gh0stz0x ♦354 |
 | 190477830 (Comments: 3) | Alejandro Jorge Depaoli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por la respuesta! No hay problema en cometer errores, es parte del proceso. Gracias por contribuir y bienvenido a OSM! commented 2026-10-15 21:42:10 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦191 |
| 167157565 (Comments: 4) | ZeLonewolf (Discussed changesets: 154) | Coming back to this. The sign says private property. Not private road. Also check https://www.bristolri.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1249/MOUNT-HOPE-COMMUNITY-FOREST-Plan, pages 5-7. The public road should at least include everything in plat 135-3. commented 2026-10-15 21:41:20 UTC by aduxas ♦47 |
| 190578248 (Comments: 1) | Jordi MF (Discussed changesets: 105) | També s'ha modificat l'etiqueta multilingüe de Crevillent per a representar millor l'ús actual en formats formals, com els diaris, tant locals com estatals en castellà: https://www.informacion.es/buscador/?tex... commented 2026-10-15 21:26:55 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,889 |
 | 190495741 (Comments: 1) | Car162 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello - You've created a turn restriction from Elifelet to Salame, this is not true - the turn is allowed and is used frequently for bus detours. The 2026 Tel Aviv GIS imagery also shows clearly it has a dedicated left turn lane from southbound ... commented 2026-10-15 21:24:27 UTC by anonymous_gushdan_mapper ♦3 |
| 190478867 (Comments: 3) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 171) | Hello, No worries - I can't criticise others of rushing things when I'm guilty of that myself. You're right - we never came to a conclusion. I'll have a read through and see if I can pull the arguments together. I�... commented 2026-10-15 21:23:17 UTC by philipcullen ♦44 |
| 190089278 (Comments: 2) | J03Lau7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ich habe das in StreetComplete in Alphaltiert geändert? Das muss ein bedienungsfehler gewesen sein, der Weg ist ganz sicher eine Mischung aus eingefahrenem Kies und Erde. Sorry, ich hoffe nur ein Anfängerfehler :-) commented 2026-10-15 21:23:12 UTC by J03Lau7 ♦1 |
| 188138571 (Comments: 1) | Deirex (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, bist Du sicher, dass die Richtung der Einbahnstraßenregelung jetzt korrekt ist? Kann mich daran erinnern, vor ca. zwei Monaten noch ein Schild am Parkplatzausgang gesehen zu haben, welches nur für Lieferverkehr die südliche Zuf... commented 2026-10-15 20:41:20 UTC by BB-plan ♦17 |
| 164345019 (Comments: 1) | OttoR (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hoi Otto, Jij hebt hele gebieden waterkant rond het Therese Scharzpark als natural=wetland getagd, maar dat is het écht niet hoor. Het gaat hier om gewoon harde grond waar de begroeiing niet gemaaid is. Maar de grond is aan de waterlijn dan... commented 2026-10-15 20:36:22 UTC by IIVQ ♦153 |
| 190419019 (Comments: 1) | Shrinks99 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hey, this changeset tagged the roadway area of Huron Street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567741277 as surface=asphalt, but the centreline way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799520745 is tagged surface=paving_stones. I seem to recall t... commented 2026-10-15 20:34:49 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦402 |
| 190430253 (Comments: 1) | LouisianaMisty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I was looking through changesets from new mappers in Louisiana and noticed your fixme on Jesma International Foodmart. My first instinct from the name would be shop=supermarket with cuisine=* from your note. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-15 20:30:05 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦50 |
| 190447004 (Comments: 3) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 35) | Dal bych mu den nebo dva na odpověď, přece jenom jsou pracovní dny, ale za mě minimálně ta část jižně od kruháče U Makra je zralá na revert. commented 2026-10-15 20:27:08 UTC by Fjana ♦45 |
| 190458366 (Comments: 1) | mascarotheodore (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OSM, Your changeset says you requested a review, so here are a few things I noticed: The way you added, Mamre Oaks Drive, looks more like a driveway (highway=service, service=driveway) rather than a residential road (h... commented 2026-10-15 20:19:48 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦50 |
| 163816663 (Comments: 2) | mapping vale (Discussed changesets: 1) | is this still under construction?? commented 2026-10-15 20:16:48 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
 | 190575884 (Comments: 1) | Koreller (Discussed changesets: 24) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 #OpenStreetMap commented 2026-10-15 20:15:57 UTC by Koreller ♦68 |
| 190558517 (Comments: 2) | Marijnvdm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wellicht heb je hier iets aan... https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.22505,4.473340,18/?datastrip=20261006_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO commented 2026-10-15 20:01:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190575490 (Comments: 1) | dmjab13 (Discussed changesets: 5) | also moved a brewery to it's new location in tatamy. so that's why this changeset is so wide. committed my own cardinal sin commented 2026-10-15 20:00:50 UTC by dmjab13 ♦153 |
| 190567675 (Comments: 1) | robinvdvleuten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-15 19:54:14 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190323558 (Comments: 2) | Berdly (Discussed changesets: 23) | @FajrAl I upgraded these roads due to how I perceive its regional prominence to be. Feel free to make any alterations, I won’t try to start an edit war commented 2026-10-15 19:48:30 UTC by Berdly ♦24 |
| 190567071 (Comments: 1) | darkteixeira1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, darkteixeira1! Essa via não é mais exclusiva para ônibus intermunicipais? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190567071 commented 2026-10-15 19:43:24 UTC by adrianojbr ♦607 |
| 156777722 (Comments: 3) | beddy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry. Thank you for the courtesy of a reply. Hope you are doing well. commented 2026-10-15 19:41:36 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦5 |
| 190569006 (Comments: 1) | João Araldi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opa, João! Aparentemente o mapeamento está correto. A falta de atualização do mapa no Strava, depende desse consumidor dos dados. Aqui há algumas informações: https://support.strava.com/p... commented 2026-10-15 19:39:58 UTC by adrianojbr ♦607 |
| 184893158 (Comments: 1) | jordann6531 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Is there any reason you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1534164119 as a pretend crossing, when there's a real crossing nearby at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3907722190 ? Fiction removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/chan... commented 2026-10-15 19:19:44 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,955 |
| 190505574 (Comments: 3) | Doeners_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, ah sorry. Goed dat je hebt aangepast. Gr, doeners commented 2026-10-15 19:18:43 UTC by Doeners_ ♦1 |
| 189022531 (Comments: 1) | Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 193) | Für das Restaurant wurde vor einer Woche durch @Multivitamat ein neuer Knoten n14265343701 angelegt (vmtl. weil das Restaurant nicht mehr auf der Karte zu sehen war). Dort wird das Restaurant als (wieder) offen markiert. Was stimmt? Die Website ... commented 2026-10-15 19:15:03 UTC by george1201 ♦347 |
| 190212512 (Comments: 1) | Multivitamat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das Restaurant ist bereits in n312918350 eingetragen. Somit ist dies hier eine Dublette und sollte gelöscht werden. Die Daten hier sollten in den schon länger bestehenden anderen Knoten übernommen werden (der hat nämlich eine ... commented 2026-10-15 19:13:15 UTC by george1201 ♦347 |
| 190536376 (Comments: 3) | bhartinegi_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Some links were broken in the previous response. I just want to share updated one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564367115 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Wbp3VwwzbU3-U6RUtvrDI8MfvdQvMVoA/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d... commented 2026-10-15 19:07:04 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦40 |
| 190557900 (Comments: 1) | Openachille (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert because of vandalims for new user whic hadd personnal inputs in French Lycée professionnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190573375 commented 2026-10-15 18:57:02 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 190557979 (Comments: 2) | Openachille (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert because of vandalims for new user whic hadd personnal inputs in French Lycée professionnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190573371 commented 2026-10-15 18:56:50 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 190557905 (Comments: 3) | lolohitolélé (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revert because of vandalims for new user whic hadd personnal inputs in French Lycée professionnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190573322 commented 2026-10-15 18:55:07 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 185192034 (Comments: 2) | SamBouwer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! I'm pretty sure I've mapped these wrong the way. I've removed the name. I think the location is correct, though, because I think the bin is next to a bench. Thanks for your feedback! commented 2026-10-15 18:52:12 UTC by SamBouwer ♦5 |
| 190557792 (Comments: 1) | lolohitolélé (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revert because of vandalims for new user whic hadd personnal inputs in French Lycée professionnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190573229 commented 2026-10-15 18:51:48 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 190557688 (Comments: 1) | lolohitolélé (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revert because of vandalims for new user whic hadd personnal inputs in French Lycée professionnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190573213 commented 2026-10-15 18:51:16 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 167576988 (Comments: 1) | olo_12 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Na pewno są oba te sklepy w tym samym budynku? I czy nadal one tam są, bo strony internetowe obu nie działają… commented 2026-10-15 18:49:04 UTC by dzamper ♦289 |
| 190567026 (Comments: 5) | Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (Discussed changesets: 30) | Ik heb de 2 dubbelingen die er nog inzaten gecorrigeerd. commented 2026-10-15 18:46:00 UTC by Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld ♦27 |
| 190557593 (Comments: 1) | lolohitolélé (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revert because of vandalims for new user whic hadd personnal inputs in French Lycée professionnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190572993 commented 2026-10-15 18:44:33 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 188447198 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:42:52 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447181 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:42:51 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 57080967 (Comments: 1) | TomaszWójcik (Discussed changesets: 37) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568695991 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568695992 w takiej sytuacji zamiast rozdrabniać się na dwie linie, wystarczy jedna linia a na niej węzeł traffic_calming=island :) commented 2026-10-15 18:42:49 UTC by dzamper ♦289 |
| 128863602 (Comments: 1) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 74) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112781818 to jest raczej trawnik albo klomb a nie ogród? :) commented 2026-10-15 18:40:34 UTC by dzamper ♦289 |
| 190558087 (Comments: 1) | joebil (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revert because of vandalims for new user whic hadd personnal inputs in French Lycée professionnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190572853 commented 2026-10-15 18:40:08 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 188447421 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:38:28 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447360 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:38:28 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447300 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:38:27 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447471 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:36:42 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447454 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:36:42 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447494 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:36:42 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447577 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:35:46 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447545 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:35:46 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447531 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:35:45 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 190536873 (Comments: 1) | KGo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you've added a C to the addr:housenumber here, but the suite number/letter is already tagged as addr:unit=C. You've also added the word "Pizza" to the name, but all of the other locations are just called "Papa John's... commented 2026-10-15 18:33:43 UTC by extraordinarymachine ♦6 |
| 188447760 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:13 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447817 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:13 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447718 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:12 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447614 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:12 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447669 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:31:12 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 190558019 (Comments: 1) | lolohitolélé (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revert because of vandalims for new user whic hadd personnal inputs in French Lycée professionnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190572540 commented 2026-10-15 18:31:02 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 190536653 (Comments: 2) | KGo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah good point. I missed that - I was adding what the business actually advertises for their address commented 2026-10-15 18:27:34 UTC by KGo ♦1 |
| 188448005 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:24:25 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447938 (Comments: 2) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:24:25 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447912 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:24:25 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 188447887 (Comments: 1) | Kandice Zimbleman (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset has been reverted due to suspected Pokemon GO mapping, that is, mapping things that do not exist in real-life for the purpose of modifying spawns in the game. Please ensure that your edits reflect what is on the ground, and use ... commented 2026-10-15 18:24:24 UTC by maxwellward ♦56 |
| 176809066 (Comments: 3) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 74) | w OSM mapujemy stan obecny a nie planowany plan zagospodarowania commented 2026-10-15 18:13:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190430586 (Comments: 4) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 19) | Neither road nor mountain pass have been moved - deleted node and pass have exact same position. But you can see this yourself easily - just compare deleted node and pass So this kind of change (no modification of pass) obviously is the best wa... commented 2026-10-15 18:05:33 UTC by rumbrummer ♦26 |
| 190571030 (Comments: 1) | djakk (Discussed changesets: 14) | Voie verte en fin d'aménagement (voir photo Panoramax) commented 2026-10-15 17:58:23 UTC by djakk ♦28 |
| 185796196 (Comments: 2) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 49) | The picture is no longer available on the note, I can't remember the type of indication there was on it : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5397782 But probably access=destination is already enough. I can't tell for foot=yes as I do... commented 2026-10-15 17:56:20 UTC by K12230LF ♦84 |
| 190570487 (Comments: 1) | ianburgwin (Discussed changesets: 2) | I walked every trail I found and recorded GPS tracks. But it was raining today so I didn’t want to try and add everything on the spot. I added the main POIs and will add the trails later on a PC. commented 2026-10-15 17:50:12 UTC by ianburgwin ♦2 |
| 190422983 (Comments: 1) | Dmitriiilies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Район где я проживаю commented 2026-10-15 17:39:09 UTC by Dmitriiilies ♦1 |
| 172355666 (Comments: 1) | jordann6531 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Was there any particular reason why you changed the pelican crossings on Southwark Street? The traffic signal stop lines, dotted crossing markings and traffic lights are clearly visible in the current Bing aerial imagery. There are some... commented 2026-10-15 17:28:49 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,955 |
| 190529169 (Comments: 4) | DerAltleher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke @turbopixel @DerAltleher Was genau hast du hier vorgehabt? Ich persönlich finde, die Parkfläche war vorher gut gemappt und getaggt. Jetzt sieht es seltsam aus, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190530030 Dan... commented 2026-10-15 17:23:04 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190548397 (Comments: 3) | Jos Verlinde (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2026-10-15 17:22:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190550455 (Comments: 2) | Leonie4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Du hast Duplikate erstellt: Mindestens DAV Mitfahrbankerl - Kesselberg 1 und 2 sind bereits vorhanden. commented 2026-10-15 17:20:41 UTC by martinst ♦422 |
| 190477206 (Comments: 7) | Willem Altes (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello, that, however, is a different matter. No one has claimed that the signage is consistent ;-) In my experience, especially in forests and in agricultural areas, a quarter of the signs are nonsense. Best regards commented 2026-10-15 17:17:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190511250 (Comments: 2) | Spagulax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour ! Merci pour le retour (Entrer les horaires était une première pour moi). Je garde précieusement le lien :-) commented 2026-10-15 17:12:33 UTC by Spagulax ♦1 |
| 190528606 (Comments: 1) | PeterDus (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, bitte schaue dir die bisherigen Changeset-Kommentare an, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170686388. Hat sich seitdem etwas ergeben, also insbesondere eine öffentlich-rechtliche Widmung irgendeiner Art? Leider verwend... commented 2026-10-15 17:06:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 184990804 (Comments: 1) | Giorgio Scifo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, il tag relativo all'attività non va messo sull'intero edificio. Stessa cosa per il numero civico (anche perché l'edificio ne ha più di uno) Aggiungo come nodo separato, e taggando con: https://wiki.open... commented 2026-10-15 17:01:30 UTC by dgitto ♦935 |
| 190506166 (Comments: 5) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | basemap soll falsch sein? der basemap Overlay hier in OSM ist teilweise veraltert. wenn ich basemap mit luftbild vergleiche und das zusammenpasst, dann ist es nicht falsch. commented 2026-10-15 16:58:39 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 190561932 (Comments: 2) | sashazykov (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, vielen Dank für den freundlichen Hinweis. Ich experimentiere gerade mit einer neuen Methode, unterwegs Daten zu sammeln: Ich fotografiere Kassenbons, Schilder und Informationstafeln und trage die daraus gewonnenen ... commented 2026-10-15 16:43:03 UTC by sashazykov ♦7 |
| 190566734 (Comments: 1) | Roel den Broeder (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hki.. Lijjkt erop dat dit wel goed is gegaan. Je kunt de BGT op de achtergrond zetten . Dan zie je precies waar de paden lopen Alles is immers ingemeten. In de edimodus rechts in het scherm bij achtergronden. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-10-15 16:34:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190564488 (Comments: 3) | Roel den Broeder (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb het pad losgemaakt. commented 2026-10-15 16:22:19 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 97008326 (Comments: 1) | Moldovan_Merkator (Discussed changesets: 35) | these multipolygons seem unnecessary commented 2026-10-15 16:20:54 UTC by sinusnombre ♦5 |
| 190561526 (Comments: 1) | Martin van den Berg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback .. De tagging van de functie heb ik verwijderd. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-15 16:11:42 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190553410 (Comments: 2) | haakseflappie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb globaal wat aanepast. Genoeg te doen hier. mapse commented 2026-10-15 16:02:56 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190562114 (Comments: 1) | J Adams (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of the nodes https://www.osm.org/node/11110521426 (tree), https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11363231497 (traffic sign). You move the nodes more than 100 meters. commented 2026-10-15 16:00:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,887 |
| 146524099 (Comments: 7) | Rick Richards (Discussed changesets: 104) | Upravené. Vďaka za podnet a diskusiu. commented 2026-10-15 15:57:40 UTC by Rick Richards ♦70 |
| 189516966 (Comments: 1) | Ctown1875 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Ctown1875, I'm thinking that a mountain peak named "Mike butt rock area" is not a real feature that belongs in OSM. Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability if you need more information o... commented 2026-10-15 15:56:06 UTC by Xvtn ♦511 |
| 190503261 (Comments: 1) | cyril31 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bonjour, attention de ne pas suivre les recommandations d'iD sur les surfaces non fermées pour les frontières (type https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=250806602#map=17/44.921981/2.449931) : c'est un bug. J�... commented 2026-10-15 15:53:53 UTC by Yunan973 ♦182 |
 | 180708903 (Comments: 2) | L blb (Discussed changesets: 1) | supprimé dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190565595 commented 2026-10-15 15:53:19 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦71 |
| 180708902 (Comments: 1) | L lkl (Discussed changesets: 1) | ecole andre Chenier existe depuis 11 ans, et tu l'as ajouté en doublon: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180708903 commented 2026-10-15 15:51:52 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦71 |
| 190564648 (Comments: 1) | Nostalgie_Vermessungszeichner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, gleichzeitig am Werk: Ich habe die Adresse (Oberer Eggweg 1) aus den für OSM zur Verfügung stehenden Quellen (GWR) entnommen: https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/ und gerade angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14287358958 commented 2026-10-15 15:49:40 UTC by Mister Kanister ♦58 |
| 187283063 (Comments: 1) | Food Loot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, I see you wanted a review. Adding a missing restaurant is okay, and most restaurant-related tags look correct. However, in this edit you filled the address fields on the node having the restaurant. As a consequence, the re... commented 2026-10-15 15:38:53 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 190553171 (Comments: 1) | haakseflappie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Op een fietspad hoef je geen bicycle=yes te taggen. Dat is default. De uitzonderingen worden wel toegevoegd.<... commented 2026-10-15 15:35:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190535231 (Comments: 1) | cragletrack (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. You changed one of the hallways in Lakeline Mall to a power line - I went ahead and fixed that for you. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-15 15:31:39 UTC by citrula ♦1,020 |
| 190551037 (Comments: 1) | ITLivePrivacy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-15 15:30:59 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190093928 (Comments: 1) | Food Loot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, I suggest you have a second look at the *location* of the node on the map. Your edit locates this restaurant in the very middle of a carriageway, which is faily unlikely. Is this a scripted edit that re-uses coordinates from a da... commented 2026-10-15 15:29:38 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 190547686 (Comments: 2) | Jos Verlinde (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Het adres heb ik hersteld. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-15 15:27:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 153106129 (Comments: 1) | OlegaSh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Добрый день! Вопрос по way 1295685413 (natural=ridge, name="Шкот Николай Яковлевич") - отрогу Ливадийского хребта через гору Лысая Баба. В ГКГН таког... commented 2026-10-15 15:26:02 UTC by dabajabaza ♦1 |
| 190562097 (Comments: 1) | Food Loot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Sadly, we had to reject your change. Il Giardino had been added to the map in 2024 and had been edited several times by various users providing the necessary details. I am surprised that you did not see there was already a... commented 2026-10-15 15:25:48 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 190284031 (Comments: 1) | Mom Tomahawk (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! I see you're back! Many of these waterways you've added look wide enough to be tagged as rivers rather than streams - a "discussion" we've had many times already. ("Discussion" in quotes as you've... commented 2026-10-15 15:24:29 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦48 |
| 190545066 (Comments: 1) | mat20056 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-15 15:21:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190506644 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 526) | Bonjour, Merci de votre alerte, effectivement c'est une erreur de création de notre part. Nous avons donc supprimé le node à ce jour. commented 2026-10-15 15:20:08 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦346 |
| 190548416 (Comments: 1) | matteoisonni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao matteoisonni Benvenuto in OSM! Ho notato i cambiamenti che hai fatto su questo tratto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370784944/history#map=19/45.947493/10.220398 conosco molto bene la zona e quello "stradello" (probabilme... commented 2026-10-15 15:14:37 UTC by demon_box ♦417 |
| 190460725 (Comments: 1) | chinghui (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190562975 commented 2026-10-15 15:07:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190449674 (Comments: 1) | GWL_Lohsa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190563289 commented 2026-10-15 15:06:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 177956383 (Comments: 2) | Jeoriga (Discussed changesets: 5) | こんにちは。このtagというのは https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13516378530/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473303101/history などの crossing=unmarked crossing:markings=no でタグ付けさ... commented 2026-10-15 15:03:45 UTC by ffff23 ♦15 |
| 190473419 (Comments: 5) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | besonders im Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg ist das mit den Buchstaben sehr wichtig, weil dort in Gebäuden oft verschiedene Abteilungen sind und die Orientierung über Gebäudebuchstabe und Eingangsnummer erfolgt. commented 2026-10-15 15:01:36 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 190562755 (Comments: 1) | Wise_Turtle (Discussed changesets: 11) | Добавлен магазин Семена commented 2026-10-15 14:57:21 UTC by Wise_Turtle ♦21 |
| 190137037 (Comments: 1) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, you seem to have added roads on top of existing features. Kindly correct the error. Thanks. commented 2026-10-15 14:54:49 UTC by carciofo ♦194 |
| 190442567 (Comments: 1) | Meroa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Meroa y bienvenido a OSM! Un pequeño apunte, en OSM lo que en España conocemos como "bar" se etiqueta con amenity=pub. Échale un vistazo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Objetos_que_generan_d... commented 2026-10-15 14:49:05 UTC by dmlls ♦34 |
| 190487568 (Comments: 2) | wb_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is an error, thanks for noticing! I'll fix it soon. commented 2026-10-15 14:46:46 UTC by wb_import ♦2 |
| 190510319 (Comments: 6) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | kurz: Relation weil ZWEI Standorte commented 2026-10-15 14:46:14 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 190524204 (Comments: 2) | aleksander25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Czemu zaznaczasz wszystko jako części samochodowe? commented 2026-10-15 14:43:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
 | 166906480 (Comments: 1) | hangukhistory (Discussed changesets: 6) | hi, I think you have to correct that path you added here, shows several issues as it crosses the museum building :) commented 2026-10-15 14:39:38 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦421 |
| 190561754 (Comments: 2) | chunchun00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 念のため、日本語です。 こんにちは、chunchun00さんのマッピングについて、質問させてください。 1. source = local knowledge chunchun00さんは日本全国のPOIを編集されています。 ... commented 2026-10-15 14:35:50 UTC by nyampire ♦205 |
| 190439449 (Comments: 2) | TOONT0 (Discussed changesets: 2) | All missing tracks which I've added so far are based on gpx file recorded during my ride. I don't look at imagery at all, just draw on the top of recorded gpx. But thanks for the NAPR, will check it. commented 2026-10-15 14:21:33 UTC by TOONT0 ♦1 |
| 190421300 (Comments: 1) | Tranchk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour J'ai remis leisure=stadium pour le vélodrome. C'est le bâtiment qui est tracé, pas les pistes de vélo. Une petite remarque : quand il y a une note osm à l'endroit que vous modifiez (c&... commented 2026-10-15 14:18:37 UTC by josmougn ♦279 |
| 190532332 (Comments: 1) | PomeloOnPizza (Discussed changesets: 12) | Why did you revert my edits and upgrade some of these minor dirt roads to secondary? commented 2026-10-15 14:17:09 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦67 |
| 190407211 (Comments: 1) | davit putkara (Discussed changesets: 1) | What does "ყოფილი 57" mean? commented 2026-10-15 14:13:28 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦336 |
| 190546398 (Comments: 4) | aixbrick (Discussed changesets: 68) | Und sowas eben auch. Das ist ja eine Fußgängerampel, Die wird vermutlich nur auf anforderung sein. Hier aber durch die highway=traffic_signals zusätzlich da sind halt auch als penalty mit drin. https://www.openstreetmap.org/nod... commented 2026-10-15 14:07:03 UTC by flohoff ♦2,612 |
| 190532701 (Comments: 2) | VexVolt (Discussed changesets: 2) | $evgenykatyshev Thanks for the explanation, should be fixed now. commented 2026-10-15 14:04:22 UTC by VexVolt ♦1 |
| 190440630 (Comments: 2) | TOONT0 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh, I see you added this tag yourself in the previous changeset. Anyway, it's better to have this tag if you know what the surface is commented 2026-10-15 14:02:29 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦336 |
| 190559923 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 31) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-10-15 13:59:46 UTC by sahshoor ♦38 |
| 190528174 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM15 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Добрый день. спасибо за замечание. Исправила. commented 2026-10-15 13:58:25 UTC by Ozon OSM15 ♦21 |
| 190469710 (Comments: 1) | MRdent32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maybe MrDent32? commented 2026-10-15 13:53:58 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦336 |
| 190533715 (Comments: 2) | PauloAlex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, desconhecia que existia vértices geodésicos em cima das torres de água, pensei que era um erro de identificação. Agradeço o alerta, vou tentar anular a alteração, foram alterados ape... commented 2026-10-15 13:53:46 UTC by PauloAlex ♦1 |
| 190557013 (Comments: 1) | lisavrv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM. Merci d’avoir trouvé une rue à sens unique. Mais attention : OSM est une carte pour tout le monde, pas uniquement une carte pour automobiles. Nous avons vérifié... commented 2026-10-15 13:52:36 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 190423884 (Comments: 1) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hi, I see that you are still moving standard tags to their less common contact versions while claiming that you are only tagging Wikidata. Please stop doing that commented 2026-10-15 13:46:26 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦498 |
| 190521113 (Comments: 2) | Blip-blip (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for the notice; will do the next time. commented 2026-10-15 13:45:18 UTC by Blip-blip ♦2 |
| 190523053 (Comments: 1) | Aleko1973 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for updating the street name. One little note. Use the full word "Street" in the English name. The old name was written incorrectly. commented 2026-10-15 13:35:54 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦336 |
| 190515934 (Comments: 2) | Mapowiec2137+ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Z uwagi na brak odpowiedzi zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-15 13:35:09 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190512615 (Comments: 2) | alex241001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia. Köszönöm az észrevételt. Ahogy az időm engedi átalakítom ezeket a paneleket a fentiekben leírt módon. commented 2026-10-15 13:28:17 UTC by alex241001 ♦1 |
| 190523918 (Comments: 2) | aleksander25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Wycofane commented 2026-10-15 13:26:06 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190523258 (Comments: 2) | aleksander25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Proszę o przemyślenie swoich następnych edycji. W przeciwnym wypadku będzie blokada commented 2026-10-15 13:25:14 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190522792 (Comments: 1) | aleksander25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-15 13:24:11 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190446992 (Comments: 4) | ivandhfr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tentu, jawaban komunitas (halaman bantuan lama): https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/55763/should-features-be-glued Tugas HOT yang sudah diarsipkan: - OpenMappingHub: https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/62641/instructions - POI... commented 2026-10-15 13:22:28 UTC by ivandhfr ♦8 |
| 190316915 (Comments: 3) | pixelmender (Discussed changesets: 8) | deleted some parts. path crossing fences commented 2026-10-15 13:05:13 UTC by Allroads ♦470 |
| 189437426 (Comments: 1) | JeffPy (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour JeffPy, A quoi correspond ce nom de la passerelle ? Est ce le nom officiel ou un nom relevé sur place ? Bonne continuation Benoît commented 2026-10-15 13:03:27 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦221 |
| 190147723 (Comments: 3) | Berti86 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also war Vorort und auf dem Schild folgendes: Regulär von Mo - Fr: 214, 231, 212. Bei Schultagen zudem Regulären auch noch: 197, 195, 229, 230, 233 commented 2026-10-15 12:58:32 UTC by Berti86 ♦1 |
| 190525078 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:43:23 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190525027 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:43:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190524961 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:43:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190524892 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:42:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190524758 (Comments: 2) | Dannymacj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535160 commented 2026-10-15 12:42:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190555907 (Comments: 1) | Enock4seth (Discussed changesets: 30) | highway=residential instead commented 2026-10-15 12:41:20 UTC by Enock4seth ♦693 |
| 190217991 (Comments: 3) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 138) | Hello, Thanks. You make me discover there is a century syntax for start dates, in fact: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date. Now, you're pushing my knowledge again, because I wound't know how to express that a POI has multipl... commented 2026-10-15 12:35:32 UTC by OSMDoudou ♦22 |
 | 188909681 (Comments: 1) | BRANDON SAMKELO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please pay more attention at accurate mapping and squaring of the buildings. Many buildings have been mapped rather sloppy. Best regards commented 2026-10-15 12:34:38 UTC by Frans S ♦11,053 |
| 190530558 (Comments: 3) | Twanton (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi.. kijk later wel even. Dat 16 zie je niet meer dan. Dat is normaal. Dat zit in de data. De meeste kaarten laten geen nummers zien. Groet.. commented 2026-10-15 12:28:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190516199 (Comments: 2) | Ombrefeu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Désolé de l'erreur, je l'avais pas vu ! Bonne journée ! commented 2026-10-15 12:14:34 UTC by Ombrefeu ♦3 |
| 190550310 (Comments: 2) | justaguy7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ach ja - es macht immer sinn noch einen Note zu pflegen mit den presseveröffentlichungen - Das hat hier schon jemand eröffnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5557469 commented 2026-10-15 12:05:17 UTC by flohoff ♦2,612 |
| 190212107 (Comments: 2) | 951_Flo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Facebook Eintrag ist falsch, danke für den Hinweis! Öffnungszeiten Mitteoch bis Freitag und Sonntag 13-17h, Samstag 10-17h commented 2026-10-15 12:04:18 UTC by 951_Flo ♦1 |
| 188980435 (Comments: 1) | chuchui (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please square each rectangular building you map at future mappings. Best regards commented 2026-10-15 12:02:06 UTC by Frans S ♦11,053 |
| 152664140 (Comments: 1) | mastermarkush (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5581684 - can you take a look? commented 2026-10-15 11:59:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 189917623 (Comments: 1) | Haneef4481 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). Check that the footways are correct as they seem to be... commented 2026-10-15 11:58:07 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦847 |
| 190396089 (Comments: 1) | Retromotion (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190553322 commented 2026-10-15 11:54:39 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 189426100 (Comments: 1) | unforgiven512 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you added a larger number of communication tags here which are not used in other places. Could you check how airport infrastructure is commonly tagged and change your tags? commented 2026-10-15 11:53:33 UTC by mueschel ♦7,399 |
| 190018295 (Comments: 1) | Pdp79892 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-10-15 11:53:32 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦847 |
| 190208701 (Comments: 2) | tansu_bla (Discussed changesets: 8) | the "Centre scolaire de Berlaymont" is now located on a landuse=education polygon. (The forested area and some meadows might be on public land since I'm not familiar with the school boundaries there). commented 2026-10-15 11:52:46 UTC by tansu_bla ♦4 |
| 190218475 (Comments: 1) | Liftit India (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-10-15 11:52:13 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦847 |
| 188258142 (Comments: 2) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 142) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5581656 commented 2026-10-15 11:43:58 UTC by YomanNH ♦551 |
| 180873594 (Comments: 1) | Carto75 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, Attention, il y avait déjà un node en shop=vacant pour cet endroit : node/11175220608/history J'ai fusionné les infos commented 2026-10-15 11:24:23 UTC by LudovicG ♦167 |
| 190426443 (Comments: 1) | MatF88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190551930 commented 2026-10-15 11:20:51 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190038332 (Comments: 1) | temmie18 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Attention aux modifications de commerce avec StreetComplete. Cela écrase les anciennes données (anciens noms qui peuvent permettre de se repérer et de refaire l'histoire d'un lieu). J'ai corrig&ea... commented 2026-10-15 11:14:48 UTC by LudovicG ♦167 |
| 190360471 (Comments: 1) | Rohina karimi2022 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190551368 commented 2026-10-15 11:11:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190147892 (Comments: 1) | MosheMadlan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, adjacent road name שמעון מישורי, not שמיון מישורי. Can you ensure that you put the right spelling into the address? commented 2026-10-15 10:53:22 UTC by Sanniu ♦695 |
| 190536686 (Comments: 4) | wies1 (Discussed changesets: 167) | Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. Das war ein Fehler, der mir bedauerlicherweise bei diesem Gebäude bzw. POI unterlaufen ist - ich habe dies soeben korrigiert Gruss wies1 commented 2026-10-15 10:48:03 UTC by wies1 ♦206 |
| 181266209 (Comments: 1) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 85) | if the road is under construction, add construction=* tag and set highway=construction https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction This enables renderers to render properly, just setting access=no confuses users of those ren... commented 2026-10-15 10:44:56 UTC by Nokkis ♦3 |
| 190470833 (Comments: 1) | EFSAA (Discussed changesets: 2) | The buildings were in fact built as data centers, there is no reason to tag it as building=commercial. If you wanted to specify that the building is now used differently, you can use amenity= or building:use= tags https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-10-15 10:41:33 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦34 |
| 190546488 (Comments: 2) | gojek_dewi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Halo, terima kasih untuk feedbacknya. Saat ini untuk tagging jalan ini sudah kami kembalikan ke tagging awal commented 2026-10-15 10:35:54 UTC by gojek_dewi ♦1 |
| 190443002 (Comments: 2) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 449) | OK, thanks for keeping a watchful eye out. Retagged as riding arena. SekeRob commented 2026-10-15 10:28:34 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,532 |
 | 190544675 (Comments: 1) | IlyaShumayeu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Данные объекты не помечаются как place=hamlet. commented 2026-10-15 10:25:32 UTC by HantDX ♦72 |
| 190303743 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | Might just be me, but I personally find this mapping style extremely ugly (not to mention wrong!), and am therefore very irritated when @vectorial8192 applies it everywhere. For horrors, look at Tin Shui Wai. commented 2026-10-15 10:15:13 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 190543716 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | Unusual indeed. Do you happen to have any pictures of this situation? Perfectly fine if not, of course. commented 2026-10-15 10:11:56 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 187613573 (Comments: 1) | Wright One (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi there, this changeset modified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296724539 in such a way that the train tracks are no longer inside the station, which is obviously wrong. Perhaps you might want to recheck this changeset? commented 2026-10-15 10:09:29 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 190535534 (Comments: 1) | Diego Merino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Diego. gracias por tus ediciones. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190535534 commented 2026-10-15 10:07:43 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190472188 (Comments: 2) | Surveyor Lewinsky (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you Rab I will check it out commented 2026-10-15 09:49:33 UTC by Surveyor Lewinsky ♦1 |
| 187359430 (Comments: 1) | LanciaDelta (Discussed changesets: 20) | Vielen Dank für deine Arbeit beim Anlegen von Äckern und Wiesen. Nur eine Bitte: Die Flächen nicht an die Straßen kleben. Ich habe das früher auch gemacht, weil es mir logisch erschien, mache das aber aus gutem Grund nicht m... commented 2026-10-15 09:40:53 UTC by MaestroGlanz ♦39 |
| 190524272 (Comments: 1) | rotsee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Det ska inte finnas flera ställen med järnvägsstationstaggar. Du gjorde detta för 10 dagar sedan. Jag kommenterade det men du har inte svarat. Jag tar bort det ännu en gång. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... commented 2026-10-15 09:35:52 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦662 |
| 190473733 (Comments: 1) | ALIEN291212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190546584 commented 2026-10-15 09:26:00 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 135003651 (Comments: 1) | deyvive (Discussed changesets: 1) | Do you have any source on why is this road tagged as foot/cyclist path instead of residental road? commented 2026-10-15 09:25:35 UTC by SambalPecelMadiun ♦8 |
 | 190515724 (Comments: 5) | muonci (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jokių problemų, sėkmės! commented 2026-10-15 09:24:39 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,136 |
| 190509273 (Comments: 2) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | ALE PRZEPRASZAM BARDZO TO JEST AKURAT REALNE MIEJSCE, POLECAM POJECHAĆ NA MIEJSCE I SPRAWDZIĆ O ILE CIEBIE TAM WPUSZCZĄ BO TO POWAŻNE PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWO GDZIE TAKICH PIWNICZAKÓW JAK TY NIE WPUSZCZAJĄ NIE MUSICIE SPRAWDZAĆ JA DODAJĘ MIEJS... commented 2026-10-15 09:21:14 UTC by Matix 102 ♦5 |
| 190469933 (Comments: 2) | BistakErik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Terima kasih atas penjelasannya, lain kali saya akan memeriksa citra Esri! commented 2026-10-15 09:12:09 UTC by BistakErik ♦1 |
| 190432345 (Comments: 1) | User_nx92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190545491 commented 2026-10-15 08:59:27 UTC by MappingMore ♦773 |
| 190429446 (Comments: 1) | Igorsliima (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190545193 commented 2026-10-15 08:56:01 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190538942 (Comments: 2) | Manutenza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hm? The places I had put on? Those places are where I go almost everyday, going from home to school, and from school to home. If you mean like I had put a lot of things or made some mistake. I apologize for that, I was just testing the map and tr... commented 2026-10-15 08:55:30 UTC by Manutenza ♦1 |
| 190522021 (Comments: 2) | HubertBober111111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | fake, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190544916 commented 2026-10-15 08:48:26 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,011 |
| 190492938 (Comments: 3) | Wright One (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thank you, I understand which source you are using now. However, I still have doubts about its accuracy in this particular case. Of course, neither of us can simply drop everything and go out to check these buoys right now, but: 1. They are no... commented 2026-10-15 08:42:46 UTC by KennyDap ♦93 |
| 185145802 (Comments: 26) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | Anyhow, if you will not do any follow-up, then I will just pretend this discussion has never existed. I/we have more interesting things to focus on. commented 2026-10-15 08:42:37 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 190544116 (Comments: 1) | assanges (Discussed changesets: 44) | apologies for missing the source: https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/dl-122101-7EF180327222410BACEAAACA2AEEFF66.html commented 2026-10-15 08:31:57 UTC by assanges ♦51 |
| 183913582 (Comments: 3) | Protoxenus (Discussed changesets: 140) | Danke für Deinen Tipp. Ich überdenke das mit der Quellenangabe noch einmal. Auf alle Fälle weiß das STALU, wie der Bach wirklich heißt . . Gruß Tino commented 2026-10-15 08:26:31 UTC by einufo ♦26 |
| 190543600 (Comments: 1) | assanges (Discussed changesets: 44) | * Standard Charted: relocated to new site * KGI Bank: relocated to Standard Charted former site * Eti Pets: new open at KGI former site commented 2026-10-15 08:22:38 UTC by assanges ♦51 |
| 190324063 (Comments: 1) | JoshuaR (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for adding the REX4. As far as I understand on the Pyhrnbahn there is now the S4, the REX4 and the IRs as well as some D train on Friday/Sunday. However, the R140 is outdated (see Relation: R140: Linz <=> Selzthal (10698655)). Therefore ... commented 2026-10-15 08:20:16 UTC by Ktn123 ♦2 |
 | 189977230 (Comments: 10) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ok, kind of didn't expect them to cut off bicycle access on both streets that way without an alternative. commented 2026-10-15 08:18:54 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦520 |
| 190542749 (Comments: 1) | concretedog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good to me 🫡 commented 2026-10-15 08:14:54 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦15 |
| 190380687 (Comments: 1) | asiful (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190539392 commented 2026-10-15 08:13:40 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190378209 (Comments: 1) | chalfeezy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190539178 commented 2026-10-15 08:13:01 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190389117 (Comments: 1) | Dorabianie kluczy samochodowych Przybyliński Automobile (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190536408 commented 2026-10-15 08:12:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190419989 (Comments: 1) | ZeeFX Studio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190543051 commented 2026-10-15 08:07:51 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
 | 190380899 (Comments: 1) | Keith Doyle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190513686 commented 2026-10-15 08:06:31 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190405960 (Comments: 1) | TranDungconthoi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190512682 commented 2026-10-15 08:05:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190419338 (Comments: 1) | Cobrin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190512110 commented 2026-10-15 08:05:07 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190411450 (Comments: 1) | Bdz25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190510442 commented 2026-10-15 08:04:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190414623 (Comments: 1) | Mom Tomahawk (Discussed changesets: 17) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190501260 commented 2026-10-15 08:03:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190495610 (Comments: 2) | MrJKL96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alles klar. Danke für den Hinweis. Hab es angepasst. commented 2026-10-15 07:57:15 UTC by MrJKL96 ♦1 |
| 190534902 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | There's no need to delete `=footway` commented 2026-10-15 07:56:05 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190504592 (Comments: 2) | kabahas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh, sorry, I was just surfing through the maps and did not notice I was in Indonesia. commented 2026-10-15 07:47:40 UTC by kabahas ♦1 |
| 190514734 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | `commercial=no` is added as an alternative to `abutters=residential` for no mixing as `landuse=commercial` commented 2026-10-15 07:38:06 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190540995 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 472) | Sorry, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35916401 hätte nicht in diesem Changeset landen sollen! commented 2026-10-15 07:36:25 UTC by habi ♦2,283 |
| 190421502 (Comments: 1) | Haar- & Kosmetikstudio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Hier hast du das Kosmetikstudio ausserhalb des Gebäudes bewegt, ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1... commented 2026-10-15 07:34:43 UTC by habi ♦2,283 |
| 190378054 (Comments: 1) | cr400bf5033 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190500770 commented 2026-10-15 07:30:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
 | 190417762 (Comments: 1) | yaideth luquez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190496055 commented 2026-10-15 07:29:39 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190418803 (Comments: 1) | Pinocchio Eco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190486806 commented 2026-10-15 07:28:47 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190403196 (Comments: 1) | sergio rol garc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190486555 commented 2026-10-15 07:28:12 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190380060 (Comments: 1) | Luke Vincere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190486258 commented 2026-10-15 07:26:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190376985 (Comments: 1) | Sebastianchosgg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190485386 commented 2026-10-15 07:26:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190397033 (Comments: 1) | chemin courte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190485223 commented 2026-10-15 07:25:21 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190393144 (Comments: 1) | John Doe Asdf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190484884 commented 2026-10-15 07:24:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190397442 (Comments: 1) | Michael K McKenzie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190484381 commented 2026-10-15 07:23:51 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190391112 (Comments: 1) | mfrep (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190440092 commented 2026-10-15 07:23:17 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190522446 (Comments: 1) | Big_Jon!!! (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey! I saw that you have a lot of changes with reviews requested. I'll take a look at them in more detail over the next few days if someone else doesn't before I do, but as for your addition in this changeset, the Pack River waterway is onl... commented 2026-10-15 07:22:33 UTC by Ponderosopine ♦15 |
 | 190425568 (Comments: 1) | rosa_riri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190439748 commented 2026-10-15 07:22:29 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 166983011 (Comments: 1) | tytoalba (Discussed changesets: 10) | Per impostare bicycle=no, hai visto segnali di divieto specifico? commented 2026-10-15 07:20:28 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦192 |
| 188023802 (Comments: 1) | Yuxian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Should be 15 m to the South East at #157 Can this be changed? commented 2026-10-15 07:13:32 UTC by rmwiltvank ♦1 |
| 187342735 (Comments: 1) | du_sxhwanz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tagging der Brücke möglicherweise nicht korrekt. Siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5581276 commented 2026-10-15 07:04:38 UTC by Steube ♦49 |
| 190507591 (Comments: 1) | Bryce Wood (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi could you please double check this changeset? it broke the Huston relation (returns 404 in nominatim) https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=2688911 commented 2026-10-15 07:02:02 UTC by vricciardulli ♦43 |
| 190345986 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | That means prohibited on carriageways only. `=use_sidepath` exactly means pedestrian must use a nearby walkway. And the data has to consider routing on `highway=tertiary` without `footway=crossing` for simplified databases. commented 2026-10-15 07:00:59 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 189179832 (Comments: 1) | kubash (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dużo z tych kresek nie jest grzbietami gór. Dla przykładu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1559936044 jeśli już to powinno przebiegać mniej więcej wzdłuż osi wyznaczonej przez Czosnkową Drogę ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/chan... commented 2026-10-15 06:53:40 UTC by mzioma ♦37 |
| 188998006 (Comments: 1) | jarekj (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hej, odcinek Mazowieckiej jednak cały czas rozkopany jest commented 2026-10-15 06:43:17 UTC by adas ♦87 |
| 190413239 (Comments: 1) | MimiRa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I would have liked to correct your incorrect details, but the business you’ve marked is located at a junction. I’ve undone the change. commented 2026-10-15 06:39:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,887 |
| 190402113 (Comments: 1) | ShoelessJoel (Discussed changesets: 2) | I'm going to continue reverting your edits indefinitely until you're willing to discuss this. Even if you're correct that there is no trace of any trail (which I doubt), this would be better solved with a change in tagging rather than ... commented 2026-10-15 06:38:06 UTC by Solarisphere ♦9 |
| 190530017 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 6) | Szia. A köztérképes azonosítót inkább így adjuk meg: ref:kozterkep=<id> Példa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12247939715 További jó szerkesztés... commented 2026-10-15 06:29:18 UTC by qstep ♦282 |
| 190476789 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | Hey Omnific! I noticed you've been making a lot of opening_hours=* fixes using the opening-hours.pages.dev tool. On the OSMus Slack, I've been communicating with some other users on making fixes, and I would greatly appreciate to be able to... commented 2026-10-15 06:21:33 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 190397781 (Comments: 1) | Rati2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190538270 commented 2026-10-15 06:16:02 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190388192 (Comments: 1) | Ecki122 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190537549 commented 2026-10-15 05:53:06 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190228346 (Comments: 4) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 150) | Ja das ist richtig, aber in der Westschweiz ist allgemein vieles noch fehlend und veraltet. Auch ausserhalb der Routen... commented 2026-10-15 05:51:58 UTC by Piagno ♦152 |
| 190537056 (Comments: 1) | Totor (Discussed changesets: 9) | Philippines Cebu Tuburan, moved Living Hope Gospel Center to Poblacion II. https://www.facebook.com/p/Living-Hope-Christian-Academy-61574785776405/ indicates Maxilom St. commented 2026-10-15 05:39:43 UTC by Totor ♦91 |
| 190477471 (Comments: 1) | Veskee (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190537141 commented 2026-10-15 05:32:25 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190537058 (Comments: 1) | Mxdanger (Discussed changesets: 30) | Fixed note/1156058 commented 2026-10-15 05:31:26 UTC by Mxdanger ♦119 |
| 190534155 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 69) | You spelled "cemetery" incorrectly in this changeset's comment. Cemetery is spelled c-e-m-e-t-e-r-y. It does not end with -ary, which is a common misspelling. --- Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2026-10-15 04:48:59 UTC by Frank Peng ♦254 |
| 190493062 (Comments: 2) | stundenuhr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, ich habe mir noch einmal Gedanken über das Tagging gemacht. Dass du die Tags surveillance:type=ALPR surveillance:zone=parking surveillance=public gelöscht hast ist in Ordnung, denn sie gehören eigentlich an... commented 2026-10-15 04:46:42 UTC by surveyor54_maintenance ♦1 |
| 190528362 (Comments: 1) | Brian H Wilson (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Thanks for getting these building types in. As for the addresses, I have a data file with addresses for all of Corvallis sitting around in my downloads that I have permission to upload, I just haven't gotten around to it yet. It doesn't... commented 2026-10-15 04:31:31 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 190528157 (Comments: 1) | Brian H Wilson (Discussed changesets: 3) | There should be an undo button at the bottom left, as long as you have "upload answers automatically" turned off in the settings, which I usually recommend anyway :-) commented 2026-10-15 04:28:08 UTC by jmarchon ♦537 |
| 190412839 (Comments: 1) | Deilson Barbosa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190535380 commented 2026-10-15 04:03:19 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190494819 (Comments: 1) | Мар'яна Sh (Discussed changesets: 33) | Cleaned up more SEO spam with malformed opening_hours=* and phone=* in changeset 190534629 commented 2026-10-15 03:19:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190528181 (Comments: 1) | Hagoga Zone (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted more apparent "Hawd" vandalism in changeset 190534588 commented 2026-10-15 03:15:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190534506 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | These are minor streets. We will simply do sidewalk=both and finish. commented 2026-10-15 03:10:08 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦229 |
| X | 190532008 (Comments: 2) | manfreddulu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes confirmed. commented 2026-10-15 03:04:33 UTC by manfreddulu ♦1 |
| 190460171 (Comments: 2) | Dek77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes I actually don't know that's where Google maps its it, but I'll be there this weekend so I can edit it or tell you so you can edit it. commented 2026-10-15 03:02:37 UTC by Dek77 ♦1 |
| 190378416 (Comments: 1) | Mr_Jay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there! It looks like this building was previously mapped as having Maximum Sight & Sound in it. Do two businesses share the space now, or has the old business moved/closed? That information would help to update the existing business nod... commented 2026-10-15 02:58:50 UTC by FeetAndInches ♦14 |
| 190415246 (Comments: 7) | nickvet419 (Discussed changesets: 98) | Yeah actually I'm kinda down with unclassified or tertiary, and arguably make 66th and 68th and 85th agree as such since they're all functionally the same system doing the same work in the same mostly retail subdivision. I think the poor d... commented 2026-10-15 01:58:07 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,613 |
| 190533392 (Comments: 1) | revent (Discussed changesets: 18) | Calling this an "airport" since there are multiple hangars... it's an "airpark". Might be better tagging. commented 2026-10-15 01:51:51 UTC by revent ♦9 |
| 189971552 (Comments: 2) | 259bd (Discussed changesets: 4) | "Are those the toilets in the church that are publicly accessible?" yes commented 2026-10-15 01:31:08 UTC by 259bd ♦1 |
| 190532571 (Comments: 1) | El Almacen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por la contribución! Revisé el cambio, dejo algunas observaciones: - La etiqueta opening_hours=* lleva un formato especial. No la leen personas sino aplicaciones y tal como está no van a hacer caso de cu&a... commented 2026-10-15 01:16:49 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦191 |
| 190485161 (Comments: 2) | feroxRED (Discussed changesets: 1) | muchas gracias por el feedback; ya lo corrijo. commented 2026-10-15 01:13:52 UTC by feroxRED ♦1 |
| 190509216 (Comments: 1) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Redundante Sitzbank-Nodes gelöscht in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190532480 commented 2026-10-15 00:51:56 UTC by Bienson ♦668 |
| 137811627 (Comments: 2) | Himké (Discussed changesets: 87) | @Mateusz Konieczny Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The tag has been updated now :) commented 2026-10-15 00:43:37 UTC by Himké ♦85 |
| 190427270 (Comments: 3) | celmap (Discussed changesets: 5) | Terima kasih! Akan saya coba perbaiki 👍 commented 2026-10-15 00:41:39 UTC by celmap ♦6 |
| 190531993 (Comments: 1) | Himké (Discussed changesets: 87) | Islington Avenue serves no function superior to parallel arterial roads commented 2026-10-15 00:32:33 UTC by Himké ♦85 |
| 190466645 (Comments: 2) | NaufalFarras (Discussed changesets: 43) | Beberapa titik kota jaraknya cukup dekat sehingga tidak bisa diketahui yang mana kota mandiri dan yang mana kota penyangga. commented 2026-10-15 00:08:20 UTC by Achmad Alqadri ♦5 |
| 190485113 (Comments: 1) | [at]AJYTO (Discussed changesets: 9) | Jika bangunannya sudah jadi individu, pakainya bukan building=terrace lagi, melainkan building=house. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=terrace commented 2026-10-14 23:29:25 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190518791 (Comments: 1) | adianto (Discussed changesets: 5) | untuk lapangan bolanya itu langsung saja tambahkan surface=grass, jadi gak perlu nambahin geometri sendiri landuse=grass. commented 2026-10-14 23:27:07 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190516348 (Comments: 1) | Kataknafsu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salam, saya sangat menyarankan Anda mencoba Tutorial Interaktif 10–15 menit di iD editor. Cukup klik tombol Edit/Sunting di web OSM, buka menu Bantuan (atau tekan H), lalu pilih Tutorial Interaktif untuk mempelajari cara membuat jalan, area, da... commented 2026-10-14 23:16:56 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190530493 (Comments: 2) | Hufkratzer (Discussed changesets: 8) | The above comment does not belong to this changeset, but to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190433432 commented 2026-10-14 23:13:16 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦918 |
| 190433432 (Comments: 1) | nuttyhawkfan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I retagged some round pens and riding arenas which you incorrectly mapped as riding centers and horse walkers, e.g. Riding arenas, not riding centers: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567852891 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567... commented 2026-10-14 23:09:19 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦918 |
| 187841092 (Comments: 7) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks for making those changes! commented 2026-10-14 23:03:16 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦28 |
 | 111462520 (Comments: 1) | abcmas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fictional location commented 2026-10-14 23:00:37 UTC by egil_design ♦1 |
| 167031404 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 147) | FYI, Way #1391258959 that you created with this changeset had some funky geometry and wasn't connected properly to other roads at either end. In the future I recommend doing some more quality control on imported roads. Thanks! commented 2026-10-14 22:57:33 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦58 |
| 189851468 (Comments: 2) | Erelen (Discussed changesets: 24) | Sorry. As you can see, this is the only such case out of more than 2'000 my changesets in Serbia. I myself cannot explain why this happened :) commented 2026-10-14 22:57:15 UTC by Erelen ♦85 |
| 190530589 (Comments: 1) | Necessarycoot72 (Discussed changesets: 85) | wrong changeset description: I fixed iD error commented 2026-10-14 22:53:26 UTC by Necessarycoot72 ♦74 |
| 189363961 (Comments: 1) | JovialBird (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey there! Welcome to OSM. This footway is representing the ground-level path between SLC and Berkner underneath the skybridge, not the skybridge itself. There's no way object for the skybridge connection yet (I don't think there are any wa... commented 2026-10-14 22:45:08 UTC by democat ♦35 |
| 190530121 (Comments: 1) | ChrisTheMapDude (Discussed changesets: 3) | The NeuroPoint Editor is currently in development to be a next generation OSM and GIS mapping program, highly advanced & easy to use. Full showcase will be shown on my page on Friday, October 16th. commented 2026-10-14 22:41:48 UTC by ChrisTheMapDude ♦1 |
| 190408813 (Comments: 3) | IronCar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Weird, Google Maps doesn't usually accept changes, and when they do, it's usually wrong-answers-only. Hence why Google still thinks half the streets in Tulsa are named after white supremacists and refuses to acknowledge I 244 was renamed f... commented 2026-10-14 22:38:08 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,613 |
| 190368600 (Comments: 5) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Google Maps also thinks half the streets in Tulsa are named after white supremacists and refuses to acknowledge that I 244 was renamed for MLK 30 years ago. They're not a credible source. commented 2026-10-14 22:36:08 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,613 |
| 190520848 (Comments: 1) | Mike Williams 3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Try to make sure not to remove features that exist on the ground. This feature was already map correctly as a private driveway, removing it was incorrect. Thanks Read more here if your interested: https://wiki.openstreetmap.... commented 2026-10-14 22:17:58 UTC by MassCartog ♦492 |
| 190525116 (Comments: 1) | Lineasborg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-14 22:05:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
 | 190092514 (Comments: 1) | Bne11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | what are you talking about? commented 2026-10-14 21:51:59 UTC by codywindrose ♦7 |
 | 190477792 (Comments: 5) | kaposts (Discussed changesets: 6) | On the east entrance it's probably this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10745369563 It was missing the tags, and location is for sure wrong, but at least schematically on default renderer, it might somewhat help to indicate position a... commented 2026-10-14 21:38:10 UTC by markalex- ♦53 |
| 154190581 (Comments: 4) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 61) | Yes! That's the approach I prefer and already use now, when converting presence tags that've been added with numeric values - as you say, it both maintains conformity in the base tags and clearly communicates the original mapper's inte... commented 2026-10-14 21:33:27 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦133 |
| 190509073 (Comments: 1) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | poprawką błędu było by skasowanie wszystkich tych tagów podtypów access, bo ten dla takiej drogi jest zawsze domyślnie `yes` commented 2026-10-14 21:19:59 UTC by Yog Sot ♦585 |
| 190162738 (Comments: 2) | KeonsinKryte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Working on theses buldings. Updating the geometry for all the buildings (Working on that) this is the data that the GeoJSON brings, this will be later deleted. commented 2026-10-14 21:03:35 UTC by KeonsinKryte ♦1 |
| 190527220 (Comments: 1) | Erik Klausen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hej, der kan gå lang tid, mindst en måned, fra du laver en ændring til den slår igennem i diverse ruteprogrammer. commented 2026-10-14 21:01:45 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,940 |
| 190525982 (Comments: 2) | Sani_112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Hinweis der Tag sollte jetzt wieder da sein, war nicht beabsichtigt das der Tag weg ist. commented 2026-10-14 20:54:48 UTC by Sani_112 ♦1 |
| 190501910 (Comments: 1) | pukkoehl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das sollte im Router gefixt werden und nicht hier. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer commented 2026-10-14 20:54:27 UTC by Strubbl ♦617 |
| 190511132 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 22) | Never mind, I've gone in and deleted the turn restriction manually (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190527202). I admittedly wasn't paying attention to the rest of the perfectly legitimate service roads and other ways yo... commented 2026-10-14 20:52:44 UTC by hoserab ♦259 |
| 190509119 (Comments: 2) | CPack (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, isced:level=1. It's an elementary school. The building is three stories high.Thank you!Corey commented 2026-10-14 20:46:06 UTC by CPack ♦1 |
| 187331341 (Comments: 1) | mama we (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, was ist denn dieses Bauhof & Sachgebiet ? Ein building=office mit industrial=depot sieht eigenartig aus. Sollte man hier vielleicht zwei separate POIs erfassen, um Verwaltung und Depot voneinander zu trennen ? (Ich st... commented 2026-10-14 20:44:23 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 190433388 (Comments: 1) | fabp66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, J'ai mis à jour les infos des pompes funèbres Pideil avec les infos du site web. Vous pouvez profiter d'une fiche pour chaque établissement sur cartes.app (d'ici quelques jours sur le fond de car... commented 2026-10-14 20:28:01 UTC by LySioS ♦162 |
| 187636600 (Comments: 1) | API_SIS67_FME (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, Les tags addr:city et post_code ne sont pas utiles sur les objets car ils peuvent être déduits de la position de l'objet. En revanche, vous pouvez utiliser addr:full pour renseigner l'adresse en mode textuel du ... commented 2026-10-14 20:26:39 UTC by gendy54 ♦616 |
| 188116564 (Comments: 1) | thiol (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Attention, pour la caserne de pompiers, vous avez 2 fois le tag alors que la caserne était déjà ajoutée. Cela fait des triplons: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Un_item,_un_objet_OSM commented 2026-10-14 20:19:36 UTC by gendy54 ♦616 |
| 190471179 (Comments: 2) | Adam Dunn (Discussed changesets: 6) | No problem. I've made quite a few mistakes in the past myself.... I'm just using Geofabrik's OSM Inspector to find issues around Calgary. commented 2026-10-14 20:02:56 UTC by Adam Dunn ♦27 |
| 190474642 (Comments: 1) | pomdapi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue, merci pour votre contribution ! Une petite remarque : ici je ne mettrais pas d'attribut name, la règle dans OpenStreetMap est de ne mettre de nom que s'il y a un panneau ou un nom clairement indiqué quelq... commented 2026-10-14 20:02:54 UTC by Vétérini ♦29 |
| 190511388 (Comments: 1) | rp92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This County Road has no posted speed limits from Manito Black top to Goofy Ridge. All traffic travels at 55 mph or greater. commented 2026-10-14 19:58:15 UTC by RMun ♦1 |
| 190514414 (Comments: 1) | SafetyIng (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hei, hier schaue mal bitte noch mal rüber... zur Zeit gibt es da offensichtlich in der Folge dieser Bearbeitung einen Geometrie-Fehler im MP: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.52029&lat=52.94044&zoom=13&baselayer... commented 2026-10-14 19:42:15 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,201 |
| 62449909 (Comments: 1) | a1exus (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've recently tried to survey the source but could not find it. Maybe the small waterfall from the creek crossing the path is the source that you mapped? Just asking so we can if needed link the panoramax image to the source and re-locate... commented 2026-10-14 19:41:52 UTC by Glyphe ♦23 |
| 190060245 (Comments: 3) | Papymaj (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ah, I hadn't noticed - and to be honest, not enough people are watching the review requests I'm afraid. You're always welcome to ask for help on one of our channels: https://openstreetmap.be/contact.html (French, English & Dutch... commented 2026-10-14 19:36:26 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,569 |
| 190484621 (Comments: 1) | Wroth91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | In future can you please save changes in places this far apart in separate changesets? commented 2026-10-14 19:33:22 UTC by hoserab ♦259 |
 | 190489622 (Comments: 1) | Baly Maps Editor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Baly Maps Editor; When shortening a name, descriptive elements and unnecessary phrases should be removed; however, the part of the name that specifies the institution's location—serving to distinguish it from other branches of the sa... commented 2026-10-14 19:20:53 UTC by Nawfal85 ♦64 |
| 189344281 (Comments: 6) | ravenfeld (Discussed changesets: 12) | En discutant avec ma copine ont se demande si tu n'as pas fait l'arrete Nord Intégral et non le couloir ? Après elle me dit qu'elle metterait plus T6 car même si il y a un pas d'escalade elle trouve la vire av... commented 2026-10-14 19:20:37 UTC by ravenfeld ♦14 |
| 168733961 (Comments: 4) | PattaFeuFeu (Discussed changesets: 10) | Das wusste ich soweit alles. Was mir allerdings immer noch nicht ganz klar ist, ist wie die zwei Sonderfälle, die ich vorher angegeben hatte, als Conditional eigentlich angegeben werden müssten. Mit deiner Änderung zu maxstay ha... commented 2026-10-14 19:16:31 UTC by PattaFeuFeu ♦33 |
| 190524291 (Comments: 1) | hauke-stieler (Discussed changesets: 50) | Wir haben beim monatlichen lokalen OSM-Treffen über https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5570007 gesprochen und uns darauf geeinigt highway=service mit entsprechenden access-Tags zu nutzen. commented 2026-10-14 19:15:53 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦355 |
| 190519418 (Comments: 1) | Derick Marin (Discussed changesets: 1) | on the 2026 imagery from Miami Dade County this is within the road area (also others like esri), please double check with aerial imagery and fix it's position. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-14 19:10:47 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| X | 190070692 (Comments: 4) | overflorian (Discussed changesets: 74) | Bon, j'ai fait la correction, problème réglé. commented 2026-10-14 19:10:12 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦252 |
 | 164632187 (Comments: 1) | denaida_sina (Discussed changesets: 1) | On the map the clothing shop "Made in Italy" looks like it is in a school. Is this correct? commented 2026-10-14 19:05:35 UTC by Marcel-NL ♦12 |
| 190502445 (Comments: 1) | JayDee1010 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi, Lijkt me oke... Die voetbalveldjes in parken worden in de regel wel meer zo gedaan al zullen er geen lijnen zijn. Als ik goed kijk zouden het ook twee veldjes kunnen zijn. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-14 18:57:38 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190500224 (Comments: 1) | Antwan Hoedemakers Art (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-14 18:54:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190520162 (Comments: 1) | Aryherton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mapeada e atualizada a via da ponte, inaugurada oficialmente no dia 03 de julho de 2026 commented 2026-10-14 18:52:19 UTC by ricaestevao ♦7 |
| 190510994 (Comments: 1) | CDFAM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-14 18:50:06 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190503434 (Comments: 1) | mijnpvcwinkel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De formats in OSM zijn altijd in UK English. Ik heb de openingstijden aangepast. MVG egie commented 2026-10-14 18:49:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190339405 (Comments: 1) | Carpathians (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hi, what color is "grown"? Did you mean brown? Please pay attention to such typos, as you are adding many such mistakes in texts I have seen from you (e.g. in Slovakia). commented 2026-10-14 18:45:20 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
| 190510550 (Comments: 1) | Carpathians (Discussed changesets: 37) | You added capacity=12 but wrote 8 vehicles into the name tag (which should must not do). Which number is correct? commented 2026-10-14 18:40:37 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
| 163543592 (Comments: 4) | Filip009 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Kľudne odstráň. commented 2026-10-14 18:40:27 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,131 |
| 190510367 (Comments: 1) | Carpathians (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hi, adding 'capacity' tag is correct, but you must not duplicate the information into the name tag. Also please provide proper changeset comments, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments . Naming all cha... commented 2026-10-14 18:39:06 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
| 189931673 (Comments: 1) | Carpathians (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hi, you must not write comments and properties of objects into the name of it. If the hut is locked, you add proper tags describing the state, e.g. access=private (as you did), and/or locked=yes (as already was present). There was no need (nor is ... commented 2026-10-14 18:36:39 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
 | 173220256 (Comments: 3) | melo_1 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Simple - by using Mapbox imagery. commented 2026-10-14 18:31:49 UTC by rarad74 ♦583 |
| 190228899 (Comments: 3) | MountNyamulagira (Discussed changesets: 1) | I found more information at https://residencialvitrine.com.br/adquirir/#mapa It's a gated community. I'll make the adjustments commented 2026-10-14 18:16:16 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦32 |
| 190000000 (Comments: 7) | Shyshka (Discussed changesets: 55) | Вітаю з крутим ID набору змін! Congrats on a cool changeset ID! commented 2026-10-14 18:10:15 UTC by IamJesse ♦5 |
| 190471037 (Comments: 3) | EFSAA (Discussed changesets: 2) | I reverted the changeset for now, as it seems deleting information has not been justified, and the building is fictional https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190521569 commented 2026-10-14 18:09:01 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦34 |
| 179887884 (Comments: 1) | JPhoenix11 (Discussed changesets: 8) | There is a painted lane. I have now added it in OSM again, though this time avoiding the now-deprecated value of opposite_lane. commented 2026-10-14 18:07:39 UTC by j numminen ♦74 |
| 144159015 (Comments: 1) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 48) | undiscussed mass edit commented 2026-10-14 18:03:27 UTC by dieterdreist ♦923 |
| 190283561 (Comments: 1) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hahaha, wow! 🤩 When I stumbled upon this uni via a reddit post, OSM didn’t even have anything for it at all, and here you go and create _this_ marvel! commented 2026-10-14 17:53:30 UTC by PattaFeuFeu ♦33 |
| 190489650 (Comments: 1) | Baly Maps Editor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Baly Maps Editor; Thank you for your contribution to developing maps in Iraq. However, I would like to point out that when shortening the names of Points of Interest (POIs), it is necessary to separate the English name from the Arabic name and ... commented 2026-10-14 17:49:14 UTC by Nawfal85 ♦64 |
| 189624930 (Comments: 3) | Sparty0 (Discussed changesets: 175) | ping commented 2026-10-14 17:43:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 180832237 (Comments: 3) | noahheffron (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for fixup! And even more for surveying, even if some fixable problems like this appear commented 2026-10-14 17:42:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190520320 (Comments: 1) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 70) | link.dataspace.copernicus.eu/bonp commented 2026-10-14 17:41:57 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,011 |
| 187457101 (Comments: 2) | julianminus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Limes, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung! Ich war noch mal vor Ort und habe mich versichert, dass tatsächlich das kleine Stück explizit als Fahrradstraße beschildert ist. Sie schließt eine Lücke zwischen zw... commented 2026-10-14 17:41:54 UTC by julianminus ♦3 |
| 190477445 (Comments: 2) | Willem Altes (Discussed changesets: 25) | Sorry, das hatte ich fals interpretiert. Danke! commented 2026-10-14 17:40:09 UTC by Willem Altes ♦18 |
| 190320299 (Comments: 1) | looping003 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please make sure to use OSM tags properly when entering addresses - the name of the village, city and postcode do not belong in addr:street. You removed the correct street tag, which I have reinstated commented 2026-10-14 17:37:06 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 190468497 (Comments: 1) | cartografy (Discussed changesets: 9) | Source correction: Mapbox Satellite commented 2026-10-14 17:35:58 UTC by cartografy ♦9 |
| 190295158 (Comments: 3) | ivansanchez (Discussed changesets: 6) | Gracias por la info! commented 2026-10-14 17:23:41 UTC by aTarom ♦1,009 |
| 190469548 (Comments: 3) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 85) | Gracias! commented 2026-10-14 17:21:28 UTC by aTarom ♦1,009 |
| 188697615 (Comments: 2) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 9) | Sorry, the changeset description is misleading, that's my fault. I didn't remove bicycle access, I just removed the bicycle=yes tags, which are redundant for the reason you've stated - bike access should be assumed on alleys unless the... commented 2026-10-14 17:07:36 UTC by Malcolm Maas ♦7 |
| 190489814 (Comments: 1) | Outn'about (Discussed changesets: 1) | Somehow you added the way to the San Juan relation. I've removed it. Also removed the name and width. We only add names to actual named features. The width was removed since it was tagged a 0. Also, changed it to a footway. Let me know if you ha... commented 2026-10-14 16:56:13 UTC by Glassman ♦6,051 |
| 48865684 (Comments: 1) | Peter Vojtek (Discussed changesets: 14) | Zdravim, ako "Novohradska cyklomagistrala" je oznacena cyklotrasa 013 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2322713 , nie 5576. Moze to byt spravnejsie? commented 2026-10-14 16:48:22 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
| 190488789 (Comments: 5) | Vergetenkilometers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi Eggie, Dank je wel voor de uitleg en de aanmoediging! Ik ga de naam Bikepark-berg verwijderen en de top met de gecontroleerde hoogte behouden. Het idee om de hoogte op mijn eigen website als naamloze top te beschrijven en bezoekers ... commented 2026-10-14 16:42:45 UTC by Vergetenkilometers ♦1 |
| 188223307 (Comments: 1) | chr_lindstrom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, använd inte streetcomplete om du inte är på plats när du lägger till information. Appen är endast menad för det. Alla ändringar du gör genom appen öronmärks med "survey", DVS att ... commented 2026-10-14 16:32:18 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦69 |
| 190515808 (Comments: 1) | muhlemann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Added addresses commented 2026-10-14 16:08:32 UTC by muhlemann ♦3 |
| 190499905 (Comments: 1) | NativeB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, après vérification sur place j'ai annulé votre modification car cette fontaine est toujours hors service. commented 2026-10-14 16:01:37 UTC by Syl ♦1,124 |
| 121144048 (Comments: 1) | TheEditor1213 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gibts denn ein spezifischen Grund, warum du die Häuser mit "Straße + Hausnummer" benannt hast? Das ist bei normalen Wohnhäuser eher unüblich. Dort wird ja einfach "addr:housenumber" und "addr:stree... commented 2026-10-14 15:48:52 UTC by jonsger ♦30 |
| 190508880 (Comments: 1) | Bryce Wood (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi Bryce Wood, I saw that you have changed Webster city limits. Can you specify the source for this, since in Tiger data it looks as it was before your change? Currently relations for Webster city and Houston are broken so this needs to be fixed.... commented 2026-10-14 15:24:02 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦242 |
| 187757532 (Comments: 1) | geonarb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just a light reminder to pay attention to things added in iD. I imported addresses across Merion Park, and you added a few buildings with addresses on top. I merged my import unto your couple houses. commented 2026-10-14 15:22:03 UTC by I-76 ♦89 |
 | 190513094 (Comments: 1) | samuelzammit (Discussed changesets: 15) | Dingli* commented 2026-10-14 15:21:45 UTC by samuelzammit ♦16 |
| 190501354 (Comments: 1) | Kalhounster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wrong location. No camera here commented 2026-10-14 15:04:31 UTC by Kalhounster ♦1 |
| 189119893 (Comments: 1) | seawolff (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bei der Abarbeitung von Datenproblemen ist mir way/1559358179 aufgefallen, da dieser keine Eigenschaften hat. Wurden hier daten von dir vergessen? commented 2026-10-14 14:58:37 UTC by RandomMapGuy ♦11 |
| 190503683 (Comments: 1) | Farmers Direct Hay and Feed LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removing this SEO spam. It is clearly not occupying an entire apartment block. commented 2026-10-14 14:57:17 UTC by Omnific ♦243 |
| 187067095 (Comments: 2) | Patrick Chevallier (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Glassman. I have no idea why my email address appears anywhere, I did not type it myself. Maybe a system bug? Best regards. commented 2026-10-14 14:33:53 UTC by Patrick Chevallier ♦2 |
| 190462272 (Comments: 1) | IulianArian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Iulian, According to OSM guidelines, a road should only be splitted if there is a physicial barrier between the directions. Which here it is not the case. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway "Roads are not to ... commented 2026-10-14 14:27:46 UTC by Buraddo ♦172 |
| 189069904 (Comments: 1) | LSWLDN (Discussed changesets: 8) | Fixed name typo in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190510026 commented 2026-10-14 14:22:07 UTC by Andy Allan ♦4 |
| 109683727 (Comments: 2) | bhoudusse2463 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello ! You are completely right, this was a typo. I did fix it Thanks for taking care commented 2026-10-14 14:20:41 UTC by bhoudusse2463 ♦1 |
| 189970471 (Comments: 2) | Carpathians (Discussed changesets: 37) | Is there an information board with the 'warning' in the 4 languages? commented 2026-10-14 14:06:26 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
| 190426195 (Comments: 1) | Abdisalan Mahad Omar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, välkommen till OpenStreetMap! Ett bra tips när man ritar byggnader är att trycka Q-knappen på tangentbordet (i iD) när man har ritat klart och valt typ. Det rätar ut hörnen och gör att byggnaden ser finar... commented 2026-10-14 14:04:23 UTC by Jnrf ♦15 |
| 166253754 (Comments: 5) | Lytter1 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Ah, på https://kortoverblik.dk/ er der "Baggrundskort → GeoDanmark quickortofoto", som advarer om unøjagtige data. Hvis kortet ikke er klart endnu, så forstår jeg bedre, hvis iD ikke vil bruge det. commented 2026-10-14 13:51:39 UTC by cyclist789 ♦155 |
| 190498439 (Comments: 2) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 13) | wyglada tak: https://living.apartify.pl/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/lokalizacja-3.png , i pewnie, ze jest zle otagowane: bylem przekonany, ze jak dodam "tunnel" w id, to doda sie buidling passage :-) , juz poprawiam commented 2026-10-14 13:50:12 UTC by capt_planet ♦15 |
| 161139244 (Comments: 2) | k127 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi Mateusz, you're probably right, thanks for the hint. Best, k127 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190508188 commented 2026-10-14 13:46:16 UTC by k127 ♦98 |
 | 190022983 (Comments: 5) | Pacha Tchernof (Discussed changesets: 5) | Если что, я есть в чате OSM Армения и там такой же ник, что здесь (но без пробела). Рад любому общению там, а не на ресурсе. Спасибо commented 2026-10-14 13:44:55 UTC by Pacha Tchernof ♦4 |
| 40458317 (Comments: 3) | Lytter1 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Ok. commented 2026-10-14 13:37:05 UTC by cyclist789 ♦155 |
| 190479616 (Comments: 1) | MrGrumpyNoob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jakie jest źródło tej zmiany? Na warstwie ulic ta droga nie ma nazwy. commented 2026-10-14 13:35:47 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,500 |
| 158265933 (Comments: 2) | conordoremus (Discussed changesets: 4) | The same applies to York Terrace West. commented 2026-10-14 13:31:43 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,955 |
| 190333871 (Comments: 2) | Zagrostabrid-زاگرس تبرید (شعبه 2) (Discussed changesets: 1) | با تشکر از شما دوست عزیز فروشگاه همه روزه از ساعت ۹ صبح تا ۷ عصر به صورت یکسره در خدمت تمامی همشهریان عزیز می باشد commented 2026-10-14 13:18:56 UTC by Zagrostabrid-زاگرس تبرید (شعبه 2) ♦1 |
| 83964336 (Comments: 1) | TZorn (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo TZorn, du hattest vor Jahren hier vehicle=permissive auf die Zufahrt zum Mönchhof getagged. Hier gibt es dazu einen Hinweis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5522422 Man erkennt rechts ein kleines Schild, dess... commented 2026-10-14 13:15:23 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 189872064 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM17 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Добрый день, приношу свои извенения, за невнимательность. Спасибо за Ваш комментарий. commented 2026-10-14 13:05:31 UTC by Ozon OSM17 ♦4 |
| 180373992 (Comments: 3) | Jørn-osm (Discussed changesets: 41) | "Broen" er kortere nu, men i teorien burde den strække sig (i bredden) helt ned til node/4615768215, hvor vandet når overfladen. Eller man kunne bare bruge tunnel=culvert i stedet for en bro. Jeg vil bare minde om problem... commented 2026-10-14 13:00:14 UTC by cyclist789 ♦155 |
 | 189518692 (Comments: 7) | AnnaCatarina (Discussed changesets: 41) | Well, LakeTana, the guidelines are "Where there is physical separation between lines at toll gates, the lines may be mapped as separate highway=* ways. For practical reasons, this is not always done." (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... commented 2026-10-14 12:55:27 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦66 |
| 190481159 (Comments: 3) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 158) | Terimakasih infonya, Bang Fajr. commented 2026-10-14 12:53:35 UTC by Faristoteles ♦24 |
| 190493960 (Comments: 1) | GenericUser82 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Waarom maak je de ingang aan het dak vast? Dat is niet juist. commented 2026-10-14 12:47:27 UTC by Rubenke ♦60 |
| 190493958 (Comments: 4) | zpetres (Discussed changesets: 1) | Értem. Módosítottam. commented 2026-10-14 12:44:03 UTC by zpetres ♦1 |
| 190456204 (Comments: 1) | GenericUser82 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Waarom voeg je dit toe? Dat je op een eenrichtingstraat in dit geval alleen naar links kan is iets wat al een logische relatie heeft, daar nog turn left aan toevoegen is mi onzinnig. Of je moet er een reden voor hebben? Dit geldt voor meer wijziginge... commented 2026-10-14 12:40:58 UTC by Rubenke ♦60 |
| 149685060 (Comments: 2) | avinet_ua (Discussed changesets: 1773) | Do not add Ukrainian names to random places if they are just mechanical translations. Also I doubt you have visited at all those places and saw those names on the ground (I doubt they all provide Ukrainian versions anywhere), even if you pretend the ... commented 2026-10-14 12:39:43 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
| 190437897 (Comments: 3) | cr85 (Discussed changesets: 3) | il restait même une erreur que j'ai pu reprendre :-) Cdlmt commented 2026-10-14 12:33:41 UTC by cr85 ♦4 |
| 190468115 (Comments: 2) | ms-spo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Schotter trifft es nicht im angegebenen Link. Erst werden Furchen gezogen, dann mit einer Mischung aus Sand und Schotter/Abbruchresten aufgefüllt und abschließend verdichtet. Nach ca. 2 Wochen sind alle Schlaglöcher wieder da. Im Somm... commented 2026-10-14 12:23:05 UTC by ms-spo ♦1 |
| 190423575 (Comments: 1) | R_S (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hier gaat wat fout, waarschijnlijk door false positives in de iD-editor / Name Suggestion Index. - De correcte schrijfwijze van DreamLand is DreamLand, niet Dreamland: https://www.dreamland.nl/ - Jumbo Foodmarkt heeft een eigen brand-tag en... commented 2026-10-14 12:21:35 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,226 |
| 8718962 (Comments: 1) | Winbladh (Discussed changesets: 20) | Er du sikker på, at vandløbene way/121652025 og way/121652030 eksisterer? Jeg kan ikke se dem på nogen kort. Jeg tror heller ikke, at vandløbet nord for node/1361153846 eksisterer. Er det fint med dig, hvis jeg sle... commented 2026-10-14 12:20:19 UTC by cyclist789 ♦155 |
| 190437651 (Comments: 1) | silence2001 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ich würde diese Änderung gerne rückgängig machen. Fahrstreifen, die nicht baulich getrennt sind, werden in OSM auch nicht mit separaten Wegen kartiert. commented 2026-10-14 12:14:38 UTC by kadiwa ♦151 |
| 190495874 (Comments: 3) | ChrisFromRV (Discussed changesets: 151) | Das erklärt jetzt nicht die Relevanz dieser alten Bahntrassen die vor Ort doch gar nicht mehr sichtbar sind (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%9Cberpr%C3%BCfbarkeit). Man zeichnet ja auch nicht Alt Buchhorn in Friedrichshafen wie... commented 2026-10-14 11:52:07 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,109 |
| 190353947 (Comments: 5) | olynx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dziękuję za wprowadzone zmiany, ale szkoda, że tak źle myślisz o ludziach. Po prostu nie byłem online. commented 2026-10-14 11:50:06 UTC by olynx ♦1 |
| 190498729 (Comments: 2) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 14) | A Kresz nem kötelezi a gyalogost ilyen esetben átmenni a másik oldalra csak mert ott van a járda. Ilyen esetben a Kresz engedi a kizárólag kerékpáros őton való gyaloglást (haszn&aac... commented 2026-10-14 11:49:32 UTC by SzilágyiGyula ♦5 |
| 190353652 (Comments: 2) | MIĘDZYRZEC PODLASKI GOATS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dzięki za sprawdzenie commented 2026-10-14 11:29:30 UTC by MIĘDZYRZEC PODLASKI GOATS ♦1 |
| 178655190 (Comments: 1) | Westharz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ahoi, du hast hier ein paar "Berggipfel" ergänzt, die gar keine sind. Was ist deine Quelle dafür? commented 2026-10-14 11:20:16 UTC by DeFra85 ♦304 |
| 190391779 (Comments: 2) | NGL-engel (Discussed changesets: 105) | Hallo turbopixel Super, Danke! Dann habe ich es ja richtig korrigiert. Genauso sah es auf den Karten aus. Gruß NGL-engel commented 2026-10-14 11:20:03 UTC by NGL-engel ♦117 |
| 190496563 (Comments: 2) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 30) | A DINPI-t pedig azért fontos megjeleníteni, mert egyrészt nem evidens az üzemeltető, a DINPI területén számos helyen nem a DINPI a területkezelő, hanem mondjuk a Parkerdő. A gáttal kapcsolat... commented 2026-10-14 11:14:51 UTC by Erdős Csanád ♦1 |
| 190241620 (Comments: 1) | JanAaronKupke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi :) der edit hier ist leider etwas schief gegangen, du hast die Grenze zwischen den Stadtteilen Anger-Crottendorf und Reudnitz erwischt statt die Riebeckstraße und auf der Grenze nochmal die Straßeneigenschaften hinterlegt. Daher... commented 2026-10-14 11:13:27 UTC by mangerlahn ♦30 |
| 125742914 (Comments: 1) | Map100000000000000 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Questo ponte pedonale è attivo o solo in progetto? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113287047/history/5 commented 2026-10-14 11:11:20 UTC by Lola Fox ♦53 |
| 190497573 (Comments: 2) | JayDee1010 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Het voetpad aan de westzijde van de Schoenerwerf heeft geen verbinding met andere wegen en aan de oostzijden ga je het hoekje om en zit je gevangen op het trottoirs. Je zult als je apart gaat intekenen (niet gebruikelijk) moeten zorgen voor verbindin... commented 2026-10-14 10:58:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190484191 (Comments: 1) | Hubert12345 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zanim powtórnie zaczniesz nanosić zmiany - z tymi samymi błędami (obszar budowy zachodzi na łąkę i las), z powodu których zostały one wycofane, odpowiedz w komentarzu na zadane wcześniej pytania. commented 2026-10-14 10:57:52 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,011 |
 | 190384948 (Comments: 1) | KhatantumurT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190499118 commented 2026-10-14 10:51:17 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 188783595 (Comments: 1) | HopsAndSpokes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding this! Just a quick note - for roundabouts/mini roundabouts, make sure to mark them as one way and remove the name= tag from the circle itself commented 2026-10-14 10:50:37 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦11 |
| 190317735 (Comments: 1) | krakost (Discussed changesets: 32) | chyba bridge srednio pasuje do parkingu p+r commented 2026-10-14 10:41:13 UTC by capt_planet ♦15 |
| 190395217 (Comments: 2) | Ornits (Discussed changesets: 9) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190498736 commented 2026-10-14 10:41:03 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,136 |
| 190481657 (Comments: 1) | Francisca Carolina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. La calle no se llama así? le borró el nombre. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190481657 commented 2026-10-14 10:39:25 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190462641 (Comments: 2) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 14) | Szia. Rendben commented 2026-10-14 10:38:29 UTC by SzilágyiGyula ♦5 |
 | 190482893 (Comments: 7) | cartographique (Discussed changesets: 4) | The inscription on the Victoria Falls Memorial states that the names of the 102 askari are listed on the NR Police Memorial. You can read the inscription in images found on Google commented 2026-10-14 10:32:55 UTC by ftcat ♦214 |
| 190447705 (Comments: 2) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 86) | Hi, you're right, it is strange. I reverted the fix to the original value. Thanks for the heads-up. commented 2026-10-14 10:29:27 UTC by Kookykooky ♦56 |
| 175017602 (Comments: 6) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 157) | maybe railway=sanitary_dump_station would also make sense? railway=waste_disposal seems to be unduly confusing commented 2026-10-14 10:21:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 189823663 (Comments: 1) | Rasch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Rasch, "Sporthalle" ist Quatsch. Hier entstehen zwei Kunstrasenplätze. commented 2026-10-14 10:07:44 UTC by Steube ♦49 |
| 190480730 (Comments: 5) | cartographique (Discussed changesets: 4) | I can't confirm it but it may just fall under the Zambian Ministry of Tourism. It is listed on their site as Victoria Falls Field Museum https://www.zambiatourism.com/museums/. Perhaps confirm with Livingstone Museum by contacting them on their... commented 2026-10-14 09:56:45 UTC by ftcat ♦214 |
| 176749191 (Comments: 1) | tpiri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, der Poller (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13426833059) müsste wohl eigentlich zum Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462394477) gehören, damit er ausgewertet werden kann. Im Moment steht er daneben. commented 2026-10-14 09:56:20 UTC by Biff ♦40 |
| 176846925 (Comments: 2) | tpiri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Inzwischen habe ich genauer nachgesehen. Ein Haltevorbot wird gemäß https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:restriction getaggt. Für die Parkbuchten auf dem Parkplatz an der Schule habe ich das so umgesetzt. Für Parkverbote en... commented 2026-10-14 09:53:29 UTC by Biff ♦40 |
| 190487108 (Comments: 4) | sjssbujhhuu (Discussed changesets: 6) | 👍 commented 2026-10-14 09:51:06 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 177562529 (Comments: 3) | KingVik (Discussed changesets: 25) | Dear @LowSpec, if you could narrow it to the object ID or the highway ID you are referring to, that will be helpful to review the edits, also I am checking it out as well and I will fix it where needed. Thank you for reaching out on this commented 2026-10-14 09:50:43 UTC by KingVik ♦85 |
| 175223796 (Comments: 1) | ZawMoe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/190496323 - no evidence of existing commented 2026-10-14 09:48:06 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦179 |
| 177422366 (Comments: 1) | ZawMoe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/190496323 - no evidence of existing commented 2026-10-14 09:48:04 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦179 |
| 184247074 (Comments: 1) | ZawMoe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/190496223 commented 2026-10-14 09:46:49 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦179 |
| 183759692 (Comments: 1) | ZawMoe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/190496223 commented 2026-10-14 09:46:47 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦179 |
| 190208856 (Comments: 1) | naivete123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good job, finding the FairwayMapper editor for OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I hope you're having fun. commented 2026-10-14 09:43:41 UTC by GOwin ♦903 |
| 190495185 (Comments: 1) | JayDee1010 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Top! commented 2026-10-14 09:29:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 188150682 (Comments: 1) | windkraft-os (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi, How did you know the detailed info about this turbine? commented 2026-10-14 09:25:47 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,569 |
| 189993020 (Comments: 1) | Waaslander (Discussed changesets: 59) | Don't forget to state your sources... commented 2026-10-14 09:20:57 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,569 |
| 136154396 (Comments: 2) | RobinHx (Discussed changesets: 8) | ja, ich werde das machen commented 2026-10-14 09:17:23 UTC by RobinHx ♦6 |
| 190352314 (Comments: 4) | schabanel (Discussed changesets: 24) | Salut, Concernant les modes de transports, clairement les barrières en place permettent aux vélos et aux piétons de passer, donc le vehicle=no n'est pas valable car il englobe les vélos. Après, concernan... commented 2026-10-14 09:14:55 UTC by schabanel ♦23 |
| 189671913 (Comments: 1) | eultra (Discussed changesets: 22) | I removed the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21452942 as it was clearly just a description and not the actual name of the object. The area=yes tag is also unneeded. commented 2026-10-14 09:14:14 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,569 |
| 190494084 (Comments: 1) | JayDee1010 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi, Hier dus eerst de adresnode selecteren en dan regels aanvullen. Nu heb je een nieuw adres aangemaakt en zijn er dus twee identieke adressen. Wanneer je de nodes naar elkaar schuift kun je ze samenvoegen. gr eggie commented 2026-10-14 09:14:12 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 122008958 (Comments: 1) | cEvLGWiQ (Discussed changesets: 32) | Gedeelte van Jachthaven Eemhof bestaat nu nog uit 5 verhuur/koop woonboten van Center Parcs. Dit wordt uitgebreid met nog eens 10 verhuur/koop woonboten zie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5059914#map=18/52.257000/5.395213&layers=N commented 2026-10-14 09:13:11 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦60 |
| 189811790 (Comments: 2) | JL5858 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.fairwaymapper.com/map/golfclub-hofgut-praforst-e-v-de commented 2026-10-14 09:10:21 UTC by Osmwithspace ♦178 |
| 189579123 (Comments: 11) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | Tai Hom Rd could be changed to start as a `=primary` / `=secondary` from Po Kong Village Rd, and a `=trunk_link` on Lung Cheung Rd. Then there's some difference. Currently I have made Lai Po Rd `=trunk` by promoting from `=primary` / `=seco... commented 2026-10-14 09:03:11 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190494071 (Comments: 1) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 58) | Kinderbad hinzugefügt und Description bei loftsauna ergänzt commented 2026-10-14 08:59:04 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦80 |
| 190455280 (Comments: 3) | Mex (Discussed changesets: 22) | could well need a bit more tweaking, the bing street side isn't super clear in places, but the routing should be better now. commented 2026-10-14 08:53:56 UTC by Mex ♦83 |
| X | 190162210 (Comments: 1) | Angielo (Discussed changesets: 4) | hi. thanks for contributing. please do try to keep your changesets a bit more local. this spans all of central america, from Oaxaca and Yucatán to all of Colombia and Ecuador, down into Brasil. commented 2026-10-14 08:51:45 UTC by dott-Frasca-Trapani ♦3 |
| 189761078 (Comments: 4) | PeeWee32 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ok .. geen probleem. commented 2026-10-14 08:47:14 UTC by PeeWee32 ♦49 |
| 190493232 (Comments: 1) | nvmas059 (Discussed changesets: 2) | der Weg wurde zurückgebaut und ist somit nicht vorhanden! commented 2026-10-14 08:46:06 UTC by nvmas059 ♦2 |
| 182680972 (Comments: 4) | uwe-s (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vielleicht ist das saisonal. Ich habe covered=no gesetzt, weil ich es so vorgefunden habe, aber eine Notiz hinzugefügt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190493208 commented 2026-10-14 08:40:29 UTC by MrAnderson ♦17 |
| 190485990 (Comments: 2) | ChristopherHerrMuller (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ertettem, jovoben ugyelek erre commented 2026-10-14 08:38:49 UTC by ChristopherHerrMuller ♦2 |
| 190491533 (Comments: 1) | MStilling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, Undlad venligst enhver form for redigering af adressepunkterne. commented 2026-10-14 08:36:46 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,940 |
| 190492771 (Comments: 1) | nvmas059 (Discussed changesets: 2) | der weg ist nicht mehr vorhanden! commented 2026-10-14 08:30:59 UTC by nvmas059 ♦2 |
| 190468588 (Comments: 4) | janhals (Discussed changesets: 34) | knooppuntnet.nl geeft weer wat er in OSM staat. Net als Waymarked Trails. Zelf gebruik ik wandelnet.nl als bron, daarvoor hebben we als OSM community toestemming voor. commented 2026-10-14 08:22:20 UTC by dvdhoven ♦997 |
| 190021463 (Comments: 2) | Максим Усович (Discussed changesets: 1) | так commented 2026-10-14 08:20:08 UTC by Максим Усович ♦1 |
| 190483047 (Comments: 1) | lena husein (Discussed changesets: 2) | beberapa sudah ada rutenya, kenapa membuat baru lagi? rute jadinya rangkap there's already a route there, why add another one? it's duplicate now commented 2026-10-14 08:10:56 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190380752 (Comments: 1) | IliketomapinmycountrybecauseIlikeit12931 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21434 commented 2026-10-14 07:57:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190357383 (Comments: 1) | Dwella (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Dwella, please check for existing objects before adding a new one. This changeset created a duplicate and overlapping building. I have deleted it. commented 2026-10-14 07:48:29 UTC by Enock4seth ♦693 |
| 185997514 (Comments: 3) | morissa14 (Discussed changesets: 15) | zamierzasz to poprawić? commented 2026-10-14 07:47:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 189199028 (Comments: 1) | Bálint (Discussed changesets: 56) | Szerintem a megállóhely neve nem "Tervezett vasúti megálló" lesz, a tervezett státuszt pedig a proposed:railway=* már kifejezi. commented 2026-10-14 07:47:05 UTC by balint36 ♦301 |
| 190400089 (Comments: 1) | SNT surgeres (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, quelle est la source pour toutes ces suppressions d'éléments visibles sur l'imagerie satellite ? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190400089 ... commented 2026-10-14 07:45:38 UTC by mw014 ♦37 |
| 190462129 (Comments: 1) | OSM-user-472946 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi, Er zijn voldoende dwarsverbindingen dus het is oke zo. Als er geen groenstroken tussen rijbaan en trottoirs zitten kun je die trottoirs beter opnemen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk left right of both. Dat geeft m... commented 2026-10-14 07:44:28 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 185875536 (Comments: 1) | Michaël Minelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | At https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80962131/history/16 this removed https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building . I readded building=yes commented 2026-10-14 07:41:16 UTC by 9_tab ♦161 |
| 184144886 (Comments: 9) | Peter23091979 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Peter, Of het helpt om het Kadaster hierover te contacteren, weet ik niet. Ik denk, dat onduidelijkheid over de toegangssituatie bij in je omgeving wandelende of fietsende mensen kan blijven bestaan. Aan de kant van je erf staat, voorzover ik ... commented 2026-10-14 07:38:14 UTC by janhals ♦22 |
| 190460275 (Comments: 7) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ik heb verder geen contact meer gehad met Bea behalve een excuus via PB voor het verwijderen van de landuse. Niet ieder ziet gelijk hoe te reageren op de changesets zelf. Uiteraard is Bea welkom met evt vragen. Gr eggie commented 2026-10-14 07:32:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
 | 190452846 (Comments: 2) | Timmy_Tesseract (Discussed changesets: 41) | typo in changeset comment, the name tag of the airport has correct spelling commented 2026-10-14 07:27:03 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦208 |
 | 108557536 (Comments: 1) | gztproject (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, just wanted to check: are you sure this is an actual observation tower and not just a hunting stand? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967221117 Thanks commented 2026-10-14 07:24:10 UTC by mk2k22 ♦49 |
| 190489697 (Comments: 1) | SustainableMapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Forget you at the Source: I went hiking there. commented 2026-10-14 07:23:42 UTC by SustainableMapper ♦2 |
| 190469366 (Comments: 1) | 9783440148426 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo 9783440148426 , warum ist der cycleway:right » lane » advisory » Weg: 769634272 & Weg: 769634273 jetzt aktuell geändert zu oneway » footway ? commented 2026-10-14 07:22:52 UTC by pitfire ♦761 |
| 190488531 (Comments: 2) | JayDee1010 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Commentaar 'improvements' is niet duidelijk. Geef concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. commented 2026-10-14 07:18:34 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 187107897 (Comments: 3) | SherbetS (Discussed changesets: 33) | These are not official ISO codes on that web page. E.g. Bitcoin is XBT, not BTC. Lightning is not a separate currency, it is still currency:XBT. It is just a special way to pay with Bitcoin. Similar to other payment methods it is tagged as: |
| 190487744 (Comments: 2) | JayDee1010 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Duplicated ways verwijderd commented 2026-10-14 07:06:12 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190487491 (Comments: 1) | JayDee1010 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Wat kleine dingen.. foot=yes hoeft niet een voetpad. incline=0 heeft geen functie hier. Wanneer trott... commented 2026-10-14 06:58:28 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
 | 190358386 (Comments: 5) | JohanSW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei igjen! Du kan gjerne kontakte meg om kartlegging i Mosseområdet, men bruk da gjerne meldingsfunksjonen i OSM. Sammenliknet med mange andre områder er Moss og omegn svært godt kartlagt. Det ligger mye arbeid bak den... commented 2026-10-14 06:54:28 UTC by ezyrider ♦2 |
| 190388381 (Comments: 2) | marco_s (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Dirk, danke für den Hinweis. Das war mir nicht bewusst. Ich achte darauf und probiere die Navigation dann auch aus. Viele Grüße Marco commented 2026-10-14 06:49:28 UTC by marco_s ♦1 |
| 188957076 (Comments: 1) | IliketomapinmycountrybecauseIlikeit12931 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you provide any material supporting these name changes? ie The council documents somewhere? commented 2026-10-14 06:38:49 UTC by tastrax ♦1,221 |
| 190457142 (Comments: 4) | ExcellentFinance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedank voor je reactie. Het is correct aangepast.. volgens de info op de website. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-10-14 06:37:34 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190346531 (Comments: 1) | Mekiwerema (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190487256 commented 2026-10-14 06:34:12 UTC by MappingMore ♦773 |
| 190407144 (Comments: 2) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 43) | The "direction" tag of one of the traffic signals was tagged with a value in degrees instead of forward or backward. Instead of playing around with the direction of the ways to allow a valid forward/backward value, I decided to apply https:... commented 2026-10-14 06:11:28 UTC by Biff ♦40 |
| 190486445 (Comments: 1) | Alex_mappt (Discussed changesets: 6) | Siehe dazu: https://machmit.kempten.de/ersatzneubau-illersteg commented 2026-10-14 06:10:04 UTC by Alex_mappt ♦4 |
| 190357681 (Comments: 1) | FAASTCUT BARBER (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190486281 commented 2026-10-14 06:08:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦773 |
| 189545087 (Comments: 2) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Joseph R P, My name is Santosh, and I’m a mapper on the OpenStreetMap team at Lyft. Thank you for identifying this issue and correcting the changeset. I apologize for the oversight. I’ll take greater care when splitting roads int... commented 2026-10-14 06:03:42 UTC by sbedwal_Lyft ♦24 |
| 181227091 (Comments: 2) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 348) | Den Namen habe ich glaube ich aus dem Blättchen, das vor Ort verteilt wird. Er wurde damals neu eingeweiht. Wenn ich mal wieder da bin, sehe ich es mir an. Vielleicht fehlt das Schild aber einfach. commented 2026-10-14 05:59:15 UTC by geozeisig ♦249 |
| 181327586 (Comments: 2) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 43) | Thanks for finding this mistake! It should be fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190485488 commented 2026-10-14 05:57:59 UTC by Biff ♦40 |
| 190227074 (Comments: 5) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Alles klar! Du wirst es schon richtig machen. 🤔 commented 2026-10-14 05:57:09 UTC by WoSoe ♦136 |
| 141329339 (Comments: 1) | Ryan Watern (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, government=weather was more accurate than government=public_service. The latter is for a public-facing customer service center for government social services. Currently, the standard name-suggestion-index preset for NWS stations uses office=gover... commented 2026-10-14 05:45:12 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦659 |
| 190385405 (Comments: 3) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Also eine Überlagerung mit einen zusätzlichen footway-Way ist sinnlos. Bushaltestellen-Way hat mit highway=platform bereits einen highway-Tag, Router sollten darüber routen können. Wenn nicht, liegt es am Routing-Algorithmus. <... commented 2026-10-14 05:33:01 UTC by Bienson ♦668 |
| 158181007 (Comments: 1) | esemenko (Discussed changesets: 21) | I reverted this changeset as abandoned railways that contain no visible infrastructure on the ground can be added on OpenHistoricalMap and rendered on OpenRailwayMap instead https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190484954 commented 2026-10-14 05:15:20 UTC by cswilson252 ♦33 |
| 189724048 (Comments: 1) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hi, I'm sure you've done helpful mapping here but it's hard to tell what has actually happened when your changeset description doesn't match what you've done at all. I was wondering why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15635... commented 2026-10-14 05:09:27 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦498 |
| 190472217 (Comments: 1) | degoogled-not-a-car (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. In this changeset you tagged Ave O as not having lane marking, when it clearly does a center line drawn. Please correct this tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190472217... commented 2026-10-14 05:01:25 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 189549898 (Comments: 1) | T Johnson 789 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure this is a surveillance camera and not something else? I would highly doubt that there is a camera on a state owned highway. commented 2026-10-14 04:41:14 UTC by RedSkies ♦15 |
| 190414157 (Comments: 2) | RUESTE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Abgeändert auf access=yes Mit Zeichen 254 ausgeschildert. Grüße :-) commented 2026-10-14 04:22:53 UTC by RUESTE ♦1 |
| 190481075 (Comments: 1) | Trod Skunk (Discussed changesets: 8) | If this is a historic ship that stays here indefinitely, I think it's appropriate to map it under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=ship. I left a comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107461767 asking for more... commented 2026-10-14 04:04:28 UTC by pwbriggs ♦507 |
| 190466095 (Comments: 2) | Abdel243 (Discussed changesets: 3) | STOP THAT! commented 2026-10-14 04:01:30 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 107461767 (Comments: 1) | JRH50 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hi! I'm curious why a ship belongs in OpenStreetMap - doesn't the ship move around? Please leave a comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190481075. Thanks! commented 2026-10-14 03:59:54 UTC by pwbriggs ♦507 |
| 190233265 (Comments: 3) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hello Sheffield_Local_26, Thank you for making the corrections based on your local knowledge of the area. I am sorry for the inconvenience, as the restriction I added was based on user feedback, based on the information available on Sheffield Cit... commented 2026-10-14 03:46:13 UTC by World_Winner ♦101 |
| 190474577 (Comments: 1) | klaberlang (Discussed changesets: 2) | ¡Hola, Antonio! Un placer volver a verte por el mapa. commented 2026-10-14 03:09:19 UTC by dcapillae ♦462 |
| 190420752 (Comments: 1) | Katiecs (Discussed changesets: 1) | the tag, access=private implies that the road has no trespassing signs posted at the entrance. If it is privately owned and maintained, then add the tag ownership=private. --- Published using OSMCha: http... commented 2026-10-14 03:04:41 UTC by Glassman ♦6,051 |
| 190430814 (Comments: 1) | falin1973698 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. В данном случае на дорогу не надо добавлять никакого названия. Ваше описание дороги можно прописать в тег description . Название... commented 2026-10-14 03:02:17 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,296 |
| 190425902 (Comments: 1) | Timothy Galusha (Discussed changesets: 1) | The building:levels tag would make the building the tallest building in the world at 2,222 floors. The old value would indicate 2 floors. Can you please review this edit and fix the building levels? --- P... commented 2026-10-14 02:50:46 UTC by Glassman ♦6,051 |
| 190299371 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | You are also supposed to exercise due diligence when making changesets. It is not very difficult to figure out what happened here. Simply deleting it does not stand up to what I would expect of someone who is not an OSM novice. commented 2026-10-14 02:50:34 UTC by kingkingHK ♦450 |
| 190481484 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 62) | I made a mistake in my editor and submitted this changeset with tags incorrectly copied from a previous changeset. The intended tags: summary=Add Megamart on Nicholson Lane. source=survey;mapillary survey:date=2026-09-27 commented 2026-10-14 02:14:39 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦82 |
| 190432879 (Comments: 4) | Achmad Alqadri (Discussed changesets: 5) | Saya paham beberapa batas administrasi di Indonesia itu menggunakan geografis sebagai batas. Namun dalam hal pemetaan, ini praktik yang buruk di Openstreetmap, karena akan sulit dalam mengelola batas administrasi ke depannya. Selain itu sudah jelas b... commented 2026-10-14 01:43:55 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190476878 (Comments: 1) | Harry000002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for adding these housenumbers. Please however make sure to write out postcodes properly in capitals and with the space, for example BA2 0JX. thanks. commented 2026-10-14 01:15:11 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 190427713 (Comments: 3) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 8) | OK, be sure to add expressway=yes to the expressway portions. commented 2026-10-14 01:01:25 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,613 |
| 190324745 (Comments: 1) | Loomyer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, please make sure to tag housenames using addr:housename=, instead of name= The same applies to housenumbers using addr:housenumber= Thanks commented 2026-10-14 00:50:44 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 190372122 (Comments: 1) | Loomyer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it doesn't look as though there is a quarry here anymore. As such, I have removed it commented 2026-10-14 00:49:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 178069435 (Comments: 1) | ZuTam (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, it would have been better to simply update the sidewalk tags on the road rather than delete the separately mapped sidewalks. I have re-added the pavements, crossings and updated the tags accordingly. commented 2026-10-14 00:43:04 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 190472501 (Comments: 1) | Arang safira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salam, saya sangat menyarankan Anda mencoba Tutorial Interaktif 10–15 menit di iD editor. Cukup klik tombol Edit/Sunting di web OSM, buka menu Bantuan (atau tekan H), lalu pilih Tutorial Interaktif untuk mempelajari cara membuat jalan, area, da... commented 2026-10-14 00:42:34 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 186770691 (Comments: 1) | jsmfrog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have the ticket vending machines facing the platform (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8272184378/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8272184380 ) been put back? I don't think that they were there last week... commented 2026-10-14 00:42:13 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,893 |
| 190371291 (Comments: 2) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello Baloo Uriza, Thank you for replying to my changeset. I am okay with non-NHS roads being reclassified as trunk, but only if a majority of the route meets expressway standards, which means 60+ mph speed limit and dual carriageway or super-... commented 2026-10-14 00:29:36 UTC by BigSushi ♦5 |
| 189467911 (Comments: 11) | lampronessa (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hai Tubeless, OSM mengedepankan diskusi terlebih dahulu. Pengguna lampronessa (adt) di sini sangat ramah dan terbuka untuk diajak berdiskusi. Jika Anda berkeberatan dengan suntingannya, Anda bisa mendiskusikannya baik-baik agar perubahannya dipulihka... commented 2026-10-14 00:29:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190328931 (Comments: 1) | justinsenemy (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, it seems the edits you've made around Steveston Interchange are based off of outdated aerial imagery. The previous version with signage reading "USA Border" and the bus on-ramp extending all the way to the intersection is more up-t... commented 2026-10-13 23:56:32 UTC by in2itivity ♦13 |
| 190478828 (Comments: 1) | TheIndra (Discussed changesets: 13) | Het was niet de bedoeling om de Gall & Gall in deze changeset op te nemen, maar ik kwam er pas achter dat ik deze perongeluk had gesloopt toen ik aan mijn aanpassingen al had gemaakt. 😅 commented 2026-10-13 23:48:54 UTC by TheIndra ♦6 |
| 185419856 (Comments: 1) | f43qsdad (Discussed changesets: 2) | You could add what kind of doctor it is commented 2026-10-13 23:18:33 UTC by YourLocalEnbyMapper ♦4 |
| 190427943 (Comments: 2) | imacardigandisaster (Discussed changesets: 4) | waterway=flowline commented 2026-10-13 23:09:45 UTC by aharvey ♦2,014 |
| 187671971 (Comments: 5) | A W C (Discussed changesets: 2) | There were no changes needed to be made, furthermore OSM data doesn't have deployments, all changes are live in the database straight away. If you mean when will the default map style be changed to show safety ramps? Maybe never, but feel... commented 2026-10-13 23:05:50 UTC by aharvey ♦2,014 |
| 190378254 (Comments: 9) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 98) | > Clearly, this is a continuation bike. It should be kept separate. I would like you to covert it back. When I asked on the #oceania discord the feedback was that this should be mapped as a single way, so I'll leave my change in place. commented 2026-10-13 23:02:18 UTC by aharvey ♦2,014 |
| 189372339 (Comments: 3) | stefvanschie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi Freek, Ik heb inderdaad de PDOK luchtfoto's gebruikt voor de wijzigingen. Vanwege de mogelijke veroudering van de afbeeldingen heb ik ook de recente wijzigingen en de toentertijd meest recente Mapillary foto's bekeken (er zijn in... commented 2026-10-13 23:01:41 UTC by stefvanschie ♦4 |
| 190375918 (Comments: 1) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Again, very strange to downgrade expressways like this. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190375918 commented 2026-10-13 22:42:47 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,613 |
| 190375727 (Comments: 1) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Looks like highway=trunk, expressway=yes would be appropriate for at least the double-carriageway portions. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190375727 ... commented 2026-10-13 22:42:20 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,613 |
| 187290819 (Comments: 1) | Svilenov (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please make sure not to glue landuse or in this case a flowerbed to roads or footways, thanks commented 2026-10-13 22:26:01 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 187280800 (Comments: 1) | Svilenov (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset added a duplicate railway station, which I have removed commented 2026-10-13 22:25:09 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 190408280 (Comments: 4) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 422) | Tja.... Dat is het enige dat je kunt doen. Wellicht kan de wegbeheerder dan paar verkeersdrempels aanleggen. Bewuste lokale mapper was er van overtuigd dat je er mocht wandelen. Ik heb hem verteld dat dit niet zo is. Op Strava en K... commented 2026-10-13 22:08:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190476954 (Comments: 1) | Freek Bes (Discussed changesets: 21) | Correctie: herstel na wijziging #189372339, niet #189761078. #189761078 bracht geen foutief werk met zich mee. commented 2026-10-13 22:08:43 UTC by Freek Bes ♦22 |
| 190301619 (Comments: 2) | CanelRob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revertido. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190476986#map=19/43.545476/-5.871512 commented 2026-10-13 22:05:55 UTC by MarinoBM ♦186 |
| 190454252 (Comments: 1) | Joss93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Le restaurant que vous avez ajouté existait déjà dans OpenStreetMap. Je me permets de supprimer le doublon. commented 2026-10-13 22:04:20 UTC by jcnl44 ♦53 |
| 187715365 (Comments: 15) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Aha! The 2-stall Flo charger got removed to make way for the Resound Energy Supercharger. Check Mapillary, which shows them installing the SfB. commented 2026-10-13 21:28:10 UTC by TheNightRider ♦89 |
| 190465641 (Comments: 1) | Abdel243 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Abdel243, OSM is a community project. Get in touch with the community and read why your links should not be in the website tag in: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenimport-azaniq. commented 2026-10-13 21:14:02 UTC by cowboyxup ♦46 |
| 190397351 (Comments: 2) | Aloade (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bonjour, j'avais pensé à un doublon, c'est une erreur de ma part donc, vous pouvez changer pas de soucis, je n'y toucherai plus commented 2026-10-13 21:04:26 UTC by Aloade ♦10 |
| 190470287 (Comments: 3) | Pozzer (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sim, devem mostrar. P. ex, eu uso o Osmand e ele mostra com mais destaque que o padrão do site do OSM. Abraço! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190470287 ... commented 2026-10-13 20:55:02 UTC by adrianojbr ♦607 |
| 190471846 (Comments: 1) | Alexandre de Menezes (Discussed changesets: 12) | Olá, Alexandre! Por que remover as restrições de retorno e adicionar novas de somente seguir em frente? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190471846 ... commented 2026-10-13 20:45:30 UTC by adrianojbr ♦607 |
| 187108114 (Comments: 4) | thimbleu (Discussed changesets: 13) | I restored the routerelation. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-10-13 20:29:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 189700330 (Comments: 3) | vargailles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! A postacím nem az út címe, tanyáknál nem kell feljelölni az utat, mert egy terület neve általában. Ez esetben az 1-es szám addr:place=Elvira major lesz + addr:housenumber... commented 2026-10-13 20:27:07 UTC by vasony ♦616 |
| 190474105 (Comments: 1) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 171) | Oops, that should say Borrow Beck in the changeset comment, not River Lune. commented 2026-10-13 20:17:42 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,136 |
| 190473761 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 15) | also moved two bus stops to be on the sidewalk as they are commented 2026-10-13 20:12:07 UTC by synthfi ♦29 |
| 190461352 (Comments: 1) | FangivomHügel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin FangivomHügel, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für deinen ersten Beitrag! Die Änderungen sehen mir weitgehend gut aus und da ist viel Gutes dabei. Allerdings sind mir ein paar Dinge aufgefallen, die du dir noch ma... commented 2026-10-13 20:09:58 UTC by PattaFeuFeu ♦33 |
| 190420671 (Comments: 3) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 76) | Danke für den Hinweis und die Quellenverlinkung. Die alten Tags sind nun wiederhergestellt und der removed:-Präfix sowie ein fixme wurden ergänzt. commented 2026-10-13 20:08:24 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦120 |
| 190367583 (Comments: 3) | TornadoFang (Discussed changesets: 25) | Danke für die Erläuterung Andy. commented 2026-10-13 19:57:45 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦120 |
| 190288359 (Comments: 4) | cdavila (Discussed changesets: 26) | It seems so, although names do not match commented 2026-10-13 19:56:19 UTC by cdavila ♦30 |
| 190260097 (Comments: 1) | f_laszlo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Szia! Legközelebb a közterület jelleget is add meg (Kend Kanuth helyett Kende Kanuth utca), amit legegyszerűbben úgy tudsz, hogy az utca résznél az alkalmazásban kiválasztod a térk&eacu... commented 2026-10-13 19:47:37 UTC by vasony ♦616 |
| 190424228 (Comments: 3) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 173) | Ok. commented 2026-10-13 19:31:02 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190453103 (Comments: 4) | Sheep678 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sounds reasonable commented 2026-10-13 19:17:05 UTC by Sheep678 ♦2 |
| 187361926 (Comments: 2) | Waldmax (Discussed changesets: 4) | thank you, just fixed it to "gas" commented 2026-10-13 19:10:59 UTC by Waldmax ♦2 |
| 190064783 (Comments: 2) | profe_sabri (Discussed changesets: 2) | hola! aun no entiendo bien cómo marcar (debo leer la documentación más atentamente). Las calles al norte no son de acceso público, es la entrada de proveedores a Terralagos commented 2026-10-13 19:08:41 UTC by profe_sabri ♦2 |
| 190459561 (Comments: 1) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 192) | по школам в Москве договорились еще несколько лет назад до такого формата названия: name=Школа № 1222 имени Маршала Советского Союза И. Х... commented 2026-10-13 19:08:22 UTC by literan ♦7,248 |
| 190304975 (Comments: 1) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 13) | Olá, James! Em Blumenau, em geral, as imagens da Esri está mais atualizadas e melhor alinhadas. Sendo assim, mais útil que as do Bing. Para informação, em outros locais de SC, Mapbox está melhor... commented 2026-10-13 19:05:31 UTC by adrianojbr ♦607 |
| 184330306 (Comments: 1) | Кируха (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-10-13 19:02:23 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,786 |
| 190471041 (Comments: 1) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | darf sehr gerne ergänzt und verbessert werden. bitte den relationsnamen ändern in "Standort Relation Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg", falls das wer kann. danke commented 2026-10-13 19:01:39 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 176349114 (Comments: 1) | Doroszlai Attila (Discussed changesets: 4) | You entered the wrong power output; it should be 400 kW. https://mapy.com/s/jalokeleho commented 2026-10-13 18:57:22 UTC by Dodko ♦1,372 |
| 190466490 (Comments: 1) | ResidencialSagradaFamilia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tudo certo! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190466490 commented 2026-10-13 18:54:17 UTC by adrianojbr ♦607 |
| 149891666 (Comments: 3) | TheConductor (Discussed changesets: 35) | Thank you. commented 2026-10-13 18:46:19 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦5 |
| 68629849 (Comments: 4) | TheConductor (Discussed changesets: 35) | Thank you. commented 2026-10-13 18:44:48 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦5 |
| 190402292 (Comments: 1) | TruthPotato (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190470109 commented 2026-10-13 18:39:25 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 117405287 (Comments: 10) | fotoscout (Discussed changesets: 11) | Super, ich freue mich, dass du jetzt auch mal vor Ort sein willst. Echte Kartographie ist immer die Begehung vor Ort. Bitte vorab auch über die Besonderheiten der Kartierung des Altbergbau informieren. Dann finden wir zusammen. Freundliche Gr... commented 2026-10-13 18:38:52 UTC by fotoscout ♦3 |
| 190469690 (Comments: 1) | limes11 (Discussed changesets: 61) | Ups, sollte so nicht. Sorry. commented 2026-10-13 18:27:14 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 190453677 (Comments: 2) | wusluf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi wusluf, please do not let untested (and possibly vibecoded) software write to the production database of OSM. commented 2026-10-13 18:26:18 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 136919475 (Comments: 1) | Javimtx (Discussed changesets: 1) | ninguna modificacion pendiente commented 2026-10-13 18:17:25 UTC by Javimtx ♦1 |
| 190424675 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 341) | To się jeszcze okaże, póki co na znakach S19 jest poprzekreślane. commented 2026-10-13 18:11:42 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦311 |
| 190263117 (Comments: 1) | ירח אפל (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thank you very much for this meaningful contribution! I've been planning on updating these for a while but was too lazy haha. There are more bus routes in Karmiel - maybe I'll add them some day. Any tips or tools specifically for mapp... commented 2026-10-13 18:10:36 UTC by joshnolan ♦14 |
| 190337862 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 327) | vdaka, doplnene commented 2026-10-13 18:07:16 UTC by mapperue ♦253 |
| 190342900 (Comments: 2) | Wholesphere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good to know, appreciated. commented 2026-10-13 18:04:36 UTC by Wholesphere ♦1 |
| 190351241 (Comments: 1) | AjBelnuovo (Discussed changesets: 78) | Olá, AjBelnuovo! Algum motivo especial para remover a etiqueta building=yes do Shopping Mueller? Abraço! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190351241 ... commented 2026-10-13 18:01:40 UTC by adrianojbr ♦607 |
| 190428729 (Comments: 2) | John Thome (Discussed changesets: 1) | You are the one who made vandal, mate commented 2026-10-13 18:01:20 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦93 |
| 190432397 (Comments: 1) | KylePolansky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catch! I was wondering why the directional prefix was sometimes listed (early voting), sometimes not (day-of voting) in the county data. Turns out it should not be there and the county's data for early voting mistakenly lists it: htt... commented 2026-10-13 18:01:11 UTC by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) ♦2 |
| 190466941 (Comments: 6) | CollinHoondert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Ik heb amenity=charging_station al toegevoegd misschien nog iets verplaatsen?)en meteen ook die straat opengezet. Die stond op access=no De wijk in aanbouw wat aangepast en de parkeerplaatsen toegevoegd. CTRL-F5 voor het effect... commented 2026-10-13 17:59:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 189573935 (Comments: 2) | IL91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190468096. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189573935 commented 2026-10-13 17:52:07 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦386 |
| 190462969 (Comments: 2) | danimad (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia. Az erdei útnál pl. hogy majd meg akarom hosszabbítani, a kerítésnél pl. hogy majd pontosabban meg akarom rajzolni, mert nem jártam be az egészet. A jövőben majd helyesen tag-elem! commented 2026-10-13 17:47:13 UTC by danimad ♦1 |
| 190380359 (Comments: 2) | Achmad Alqadri (Discussed changesets: 5) | Halo, mohon baca pedoman pendandaan kawasan perkotaan yang telah disetujui untuk pemetaan OSM di Indonesia di osm.wiki/Indonesia/Pedoman_penandaan_kota_dan_perkotaan. Tidak hanya kota yang dapat diberi tag place=city commented 2026-10-13 17:20:46 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦93 |
| X | 190375683 (Comments: 2) | LakeDian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi FajrAl, Thanks for reaching out! Yes, I had some problems uploading and it seems like there was some overlap between this changeset and another one I made [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190288590] in Nigeria. commented 2026-10-13 17:15:36 UTC by LakeDian ♦1 |
| 187944533 (Comments: 2) | Bálint (Discussed changesets: 56) | Szia, rendben, átírtam. commented 2026-10-13 17:12:53 UTC by Bálint ♦33 |
| 189871886 (Comments: 2) | Walker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, natürlich nicht. Ich weiß, dass das nicht sauber war, aber vorher war der Name "Baumarkt". Das passt definitiv nicht (mehr) und ist auch keine Vorgabe für die anschließende Nutzung. Ich lösche den Namen vol... commented 2026-10-13 17:08:04 UTC by Walker ♦1 |
| 190462535 (Comments: 1) | jamessawle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The water feature should still be tagged as natural=water and water=pond. I've added the tags. Regards Bernard/ commented 2026-10-13 16:59:21 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,398 |
| 190465380 (Comments: 1) | Preben Vangberg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Should probably ad some more reasoning: For things that are clearly in the Welsh speaking areas of Wales I selected the Welsh name. The A55 and North Wales Coast Line go into England and were already majority English named, hence I set them to Englis... commented 2026-10-13 16:56:54 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦15 |
| 184340726 (Comments: 1) | vlfkrjeushshawiwu447hfhrj3jedjd (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Что вы пытались обозначить? commented 2026-10-13 16:51:57 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,786 |
| 185866221 (Comments: 1) | Vladislav Gradovich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, do you know when Lincoln Road / Route 102 will reopen? commented 2026-10-13 16:34:56 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦402 |
| 189885495 (Comments: 6) | Liegeflitzer (Discussed changesets: 5) | OK. Danke. Ich passe das an. Schöne Grüße commented 2026-10-13 16:22:44 UTC by Liegeflitzer ♦5 |
| 190463772 (Comments: 1) | alfonsojon (Discussed changesets: 1) | cdn5.com HQ is here commented 2026-10-13 16:18:27 UTC by CDN5COM ♦1 |
| 190427803 (Comments: 1) | moosewx (Discussed changesets: 1) | "Pride Park" is already set in official_name=*, so to me adding it also to name=* seems like duplication, so the question becomes is "Miami Beach Convention Center Park" used anywhere (including on government websites, signs on s... commented 2026-10-13 15:57:19 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 190366230 (Comments: 3) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-13 15:56:48 UTC by ohmanger ♦54 |
 | 107886611 (Comments: 2) | CagneWaterway (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mateusz Konieczny, This editor is no longer on our team so I will be responding on their behalf. I see your note is questioning the natural=spring tag on [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/354446566]. Looking through the history of this area and... commented 2026-10-13 15:56:34 UTC by PointeDesAlmadies ♦2 |
| 190450707 (Comments: 2) | ScaniaPower (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb het gelezen, bedankt. commented 2026-10-13 15:55:57 UTC by ScaniaPower ♦1 |
| 190456551 (Comments: 2) | skipper6586 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Het restaurant staat toch al op de kaart. Ik heb je bijdrage verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-13 15:47:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190460193 (Comments: 3) | Bea Claessens (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted by Wijzigingenset #190461383 Zolang je paden blijft verwijderen wordt er teruggedraaid. Nu heb je door de verwijderingen ook losse stukje pad en track en is de routering zoek. Volg svp de juiste procedure. Lees hier d... commented 2026-10-13 15:34:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190449728 (Comments: 1) | Ondřej Lopatka (Discussed changesets: 6) | je tu zúžená vozovka, ale highway=tertiary má jen embedded_rails, to je asi ok. commented 2026-10-13 15:33:34 UTC by Piskvor ♦521 |
| 190192638 (Comments: 2) | Map_Moderator (Discussed changesets: 8) | זה הקישור לוויקי https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:rungs commented 2026-10-13 15:30:59 UTC by hatul ♦540 |
| 189265286 (Comments: 4) | Andrea Motoveneti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for information. So the access tags should be set to "no" again. commented 2026-10-13 15:30:36 UTC by Demido ♦6 |
| 190441065 (Comments: 1) | indr@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | kenapa access=private? apakah jalan ini dimiliki oleh seseorang (berada di tanah SHM)? commented 2026-10-13 15:15:20 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190441372 (Comments: 1) | indr@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Salam, saya sangat menyarankan Anda mencoba Tutorial Interaktif 10–15 menit di iD editor. Cukup klik tombol Edit/Sunting di web OSM, buka menu Bantuan (atau tekan H), lalu pilih Tutorial Interaktif untuk mempelajari cara membuat jalan, area, da... commented 2026-10-13 15:14:18 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190419305 (Comments: 4) | hatul (Discussed changesets: 47) | Given that you are confident in your results, could you share how you performed the conversion and which tools you used? Since I used Mapeak to convert the original Israel New Grid (ITM) coordinates from MALHAM, I'd like to understand what is ca... commented 2026-10-13 15:12:57 UTC by hatul ♦540 |
| 190457635 (Comments: 5) | Bea Claessens (Discussed changesets: 5) | Alle changesets zijn teruggedraaid. De landuse bos en heide is daarmee hersteld en ook de paden. Paden die op slot staan geef je de tag access=no mee.. Paden die verdwijnen of verdwenen zijn (maar wel herkenbaar op de luchtfotos) tag je met... commented 2026-10-13 15:12:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190378037 (Comments: 1) | nfoxers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lebih baik bertanya kepada komunitas bagaimana cara memetakan saluran udara commented 2026-10-13 15:09:20 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190281894 (Comments: 2) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi cowboyxup, thank you for making the corrections. My intention was not to place the road on the sidewalk but I see what you mean. I’ll be more aware of the configuration of the surrounding features, not just the road segments in my future edi... commented 2026-10-13 15:04:09 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦46 |
| 190458012 (Comments: 4) | Bea Claessens (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted by Wijzigingenset #190459499 commented 2026-10-13 15:02:50 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190459037 (Comments: 3) | Bea Claessens (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted by Wijzigingenset #190459483 commented 2026-10-13 15:02:28 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190459134 (Comments: 3) | Bea Claessens (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted by Wijzigingenset #190459458 commented 2026-10-13 15:02:10 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190246690 (Comments: 2) | Metauro (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi SekeRob, thank you for making the corrections. I overlooked verifying the existing restrictions after remodeling the junction, which resulted in the issue. Thanks for raising your concern on this. I’ll be more aware to check existing affecte... commented 2026-10-13 15:01:45 UTC by Metauro ♦16 |
| 190334493 (Comments: 9) | Mapowiec2137+ (Discussed changesets: 5) | może zależy od tego jak się napisze? "user XYZ ignored changeset comment LINK and they edited later at LINK" czy kilka stron tekstu po polsku commented 2026-10-13 14:57:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 109128606 (Comments: 2) | Bathyscapher (Discussed changesets: 120) | Hey Mateusz, ya, you're right for sure! Thank you for paying attention :) commented 2026-10-13 14:53:17 UTC by Bathyscapher ♦26 |
| 184935700 (Comments: 2) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 175) | Geometrię słupów wsporczych pod estakadą mam z materiałów przetargowych (dokładnie z dokumentacji powykonawczej, zatem stanu końcowego projektu) commented 2026-10-13 14:50:14 UTC by Anas masuris ♦215 |
| 190450317 (Comments: 1) | mujairkitten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salam, saya sangat menyarankan Anda mencoba Tutorial Interaktif 10–15 menit di iD editor. Cukup klik tombol Edit/Sunting di web OSM, buka menu Bantuan (atau tekan H), lalu pilih Tutorial Interaktif untuk mempelajari cara membuat jalan, area, da... commented 2026-10-13 14:50:01 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190412321 (Comments: 2) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 128) | Zmazal som polia aj luky kedze zavadzali pri spresnovani landuse. Pozri les medzi Bacuchom a Polomkou. Ked Boh a zdravie dovoli, postupne to planujem sprasnovat. commented 2026-10-13 14:47:51 UTC by *Martin* ♦665 |
| 190451150 (Comments: 1) | Smposilagon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salam, saya sangat menyarankan Anda mencoba Tutorial Interaktif 10–15 menit di iD editor. Cukup klik tombol Edit/Sunting di web OSM, buka menu Bantuan (atau tekan H), lalu pilih Tutorial Interaktif untuk mempelajari cara membuat jalan, area, da... commented 2026-10-13 14:47:34 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190454220 (Comments: 1) | king_2045_zxcv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salam, saya sangat menyarankan Anda mencoba Tutorial Interaktif 10–15 menit di iD editor. Cukup klik tombol Edit/Sunting di web OSM, buka menu Bantuan (atau tekan H), lalu pilih Tutorial Interaktif untuk mempelajari cara membuat jalan, area, da... commented 2026-10-13 14:46:17 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 169347256 (Comments: 1) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 56) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5571197 commented 2026-10-13 14:45:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 189389064 (Comments: 2) | Koen_VdE (Discussed changesets: 14) | Gebaseerd op het gecensureerde gebied is het misschien wat groter als wat ik nu deed... commented 2026-10-13 14:37:27 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,569 |
| 183804758 (Comments: 1) | Vladislav Grechannik (Discussed changesets: 3) | I would rather use ` highway=corridor` in this case. It is actually replacement for `highway=footway` + `indoor=yes`. commented 2026-10-13 14:35:45 UTC by JanezPavelZebovec ♦41 |
| 190038923 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi George Sears, thank you for reaching and pointing this out. While I thought the distance between the two sections were short and went on to merge them, I understand your point, and see that they are far enough to not get merged. Changeset reverted... commented 2026-10-13 14:32:18 UTC by Ky_AT ♦27 |
| 190395422 (Comments: 2) | Pan_Nug (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reverting the changeset and for reaching out to me know of the issue. Noted for future reference. commented 2026-10-13 14:31:32 UTC by Pan_Nug ♦9 |
| 122095018 (Comments: 5) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 113) | now discussed at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-qualifies-as-junction-circular/148748 commented 2026-10-13 14:24:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190455891 (Comments: 1) | TummyLicker (Discussed changesets: 4) | I appreciate your humility and being responsible for your mistakes. Thanks for your contribution! commented 2026-10-13 14:23:30 UTC by yitimox ♦51 |
| 188554803 (Comments: 2) | frspp import (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yep, I had to manually delete two demolished buildings, brought back to life by this import, in Helsinki. One of the buildings was demolished over five years ago, so the data used is REALLY stale! commented 2026-10-13 14:22:55 UTC by Tolstoi21 ♦25 |
| 190175453 (Comments: 2) | Dren ar Frankig (Discussed changesets: 23) | I just added the "name:br" tag, previous errors aren't mine. commented 2026-10-13 14:10:42 UTC by Dren ar Frankig ♦14 |
| 173546345 (Comments: 2) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello, VLD318 is no longer part of our team but I agree with you that the foot=permissive tag on way 204000527 is unnecessary. I will go ahead and make the fix. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. VLD192 commented 2026-10-13 14:06:18 UTC by VLD192 ♦12 |
| 190348181 (Comments: 3) | Mapowiec2137+ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Podejrzewam, że tu reakcji nie będzie żadnej commented 2026-10-13 14:03:07 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 189875323 (Comments: 1) | gncrK (Discussed changesets: 12) | Cześć, dzięki za aktualizację. Czy jesteś pewien, że budowa drogi nazwanej "Mironicka Obwodowa" już się rozpoczęła? Nie dostrzegam tego jeszcze na najnowszych zdjęciach Sentinel-2. commented 2026-10-13 13:38:49 UTC by czebureks ♦191 |
| 188870359 (Comments: 6) | KirstenPNL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Maar nogmaals .. Wanneer use_sidepath niet werkt dan wordt het tijd om terugmelding te doen naar CityStrides, want het effect zou hetzelfde moeten zijn. Mapse, commented 2026-10-13 13:38:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190201157 (Comments: 1) | PHIL63730 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, bienvenue ! Merci pour votre modif, par contre attention, vous avez modifié par erreur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41815125, ca a été corrigé depuis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190451679 ... commented 2026-10-13 13:31:55 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦71 |
| 190271911 (Comments: 9) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 984) | Oui. J'ai vu. Merci. Il ne resque que quelques corrections. commented 2026-10-13 13:30:34 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦266 |
| 190449890 (Comments: 1) | Peter Durinck (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback En zet je die paaltjes tzt dan ook weer terug? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-13 13:18:28 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190453637 (Comments: 1) | Cristoffs (Discussed changesets: 141) | Bardzo ładne drzewo commented 2026-10-13 13:14:30 UTC by Geo_M ♦1 |
| 189243977 (Comments: 1) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 120) | Hi, gibt es einen Grund hier keine normalen destination-Tags zu verwenden? Ich habe schon einige dieser Entfernungstafeln so getagged gesehen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14196349871 commented 2026-10-13 13:13:06 UTC by mueschel ♦7,399 |
| 189925214 (Comments: 2) | Younes_Saadatikian (Discussed changesets: 10) | سلام وقت شما هم بخیر دوست عزیز بله حق با شماست اینجا اشتباه شده .. بنده پیامهای نظرات برام بالا نمیاد و متوجه آنها نشدم .. 🌹 commented 2026-10-13 13:08:08 UTC by Younes_Saadatikian ♦1 |
| 169473898 (Comments: 1) | Nzau (Discussed changesets: 78) | Bicycle=designated est pertinent car il ne signifie pas yes mais qu'un panneau le mentionne explicitement. lire https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated commented 2026-10-13 12:51:07 UTC by l3BAM ♦76 |
| 190426579 (Comments: 2) | Heterodyne (Discussed changesets: 6) | I can see corrections concerning the shape of the individual sports field, to which I have no problem. But how do we handle the problem of having multiple sports field/track? The basketball and handball courts intersect the track field. Won't th... commented 2026-10-13 12:49:34 UTC by Heterodyne ♦2 |
| 150903390 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 173) | Cette délimitation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279799494 me semble en doublon avec le site englobant de la SEDA. commented 2026-10-13 12:44:19 UTC by l3BAM ♦76 |
| 190406237 (Comments: 1) | Julio_Castro_16 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Eso definitivamente no es una cancha de futbol. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190406237 commented 2026-10-13 12:43:22 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190414714 (Comments: 1) | abiding-wok (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Buenos días, en Openstreetmap los glaciares de roca se mapean como natural=scree + geological=rock_glacier. La etiqueta natural=glacier se utiliza para los glaciares típicos de montaña o de valle. Ver acá: https://wi... commented 2026-10-13 12:43:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 189980063 (Comments: 1) | Michidulli77 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hier auch ein natural=cliff https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564897550? Ich habe es rückgängig gemacht commented 2026-10-13 12:38:11 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 189946378 (Comments: 1) | Michidulli77 (Discussed changesets: 3) | War das mit natural=cliff Absicht? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495066607 commented 2026-10-13 12:35:27 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190438820 (Comments: 3) | Ryetec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please check that what I've added is correct. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-10-13 12:28:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,398 |
| 190440547 (Comments: 1) | 2uo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Es scheint dass hier der untere Stop als lit=no und der Obere als lit=yes gesetzt wurde, aber aufgrund der Nähe würde ich sagen dass beide beleutet sein müssten? commented 2026-10-13 12:25:02 UTC by geneuse ♦5 |
| 190424147 (Comments: 1) | cobal123456 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Se pueden cambiar los tags sin borrar todo lo que había antes. No dude en preguntar. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190424147 commented 2026-10-13 12:21:38 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 170376935 (Comments: 1) | NVBW_Edit_ToniE (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, im Rahmen der gestrigen Railway-Challenge auf der OSM-Seite ist mit aufgefallen, dass hier die "ref" Tags an den Bahnsteigen (public_transport=platform) vollständig entfernt und durch local_ref ersetzt wurden. Das kann do... commented 2026-10-13 12:19:00 UTC by KartKollektor ♦61 |
| 190427925 (Comments: 1) | IgnacioBravo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190427925 commented 2026-10-13 12:18:35 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 175128979 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 92) | Hori akats bat izan zen, noski. Izenak «/» bat zuen, bi hizkuntzetako izenak bereizteko aurreko estandarraren arabera. Normalizazioa eskala handian egiten denean, noski, akatsak ere egingo dira. Hala ere, eskuz eginda baino askoz aurrerap... commented 2026-10-13 12:15:38 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦355 |
| 190423428 (Comments: 2) | Peter Elderson (Discussed changesets: 120) | Ha ja, ongelukje. Wsch geselecteerd gehad bij het verwijderen van iets anders! Ik heb er weer een bos van gemaakt. Bedankt! commented 2026-10-13 12:13:00 UTC by Peter Elderson ♦167 |
 | 24596742 (Comments: 1) | Keyser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Keyser is a top-tier commercial real estate firm in Arizona, serving exclusively as a dedicated tenant advocate for businesses across Phoenix, Scottsdale, Tempe, and Chandler. We specialize in helping companies lease and secure premier commercial pro... commented 2026-10-13 12:11:05 UTC by 09Keyser ♦1 |
| 182944358 (Comments: 4) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 92) | > zergatik erabaki duzu inportazioa GeoEuskaditik egitea, azterketarik egin gabe eta ez Araba edo Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundiaren webgunetik? Erraza da. Changeset honetan +2K elementu baino gehiago daude, eta horietako asko zuzenak dira. GeoEu... commented 2026-10-13 12:05:01 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦355 |
| 54956719 (Comments: 2) | MicDK (Discussed changesets: 76) | Den ene var en sten i strandkanten, som på nye luftfotors er væk (dækket af sand). Den anden er en stor sten i vandet udenfor det nor, som lokalt kaldes Sylten. Den er nu tegnet ind med højde og søkortsmarkering... commented 2026-10-13 12:03:54 UTC by MicDK ♦76 |
| 190415929 (Comments: 1) | 1146272263625258189 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190449166 commented 2026-10-13 11:45:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 165147525 (Comments: 1) | Schramme (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5570112 ? commented 2026-10-13 11:44:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 34009194 (Comments: 1) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 120) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5570113 ? commented 2026-10-13 11:44:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190448461 (Comments: 1) | JTS51 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Dag JTS De wandelroute bevatte nu een gat. Ik heb het voorlopig hersteld. Twee stukjes residential staan nog onder construction, eggie commented 2026-10-13 11:38:48 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190448807 (Comments: 1) | tux67 (Discussed changesets: 134) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190448807 commented 2026-10-13 11:38:04 UTC by tux67 ♦2,078 |
| 190443985 (Comments: 4) | gvb (Discussed changesets: 3) | Die no u turn zal wel werken zo. Of die fietsafslag van jou was kon ik niet zien. Mapse commented 2026-10-13 11:32:59 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190375669 (Comments: 1) | Arthur_Castro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190448214 commented 2026-10-13 11:32:05 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 186189199 (Comments: 3) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 20) | Interesting. I was going by https://explore.osmaps.com/?lat=52.63574&lon=-2.24604&zoom=12.8944&overlays=os-ncn-layer&style=Standard&type=2d, which still shows this section present. Anecdotally, I rode the section between Bi... commented 2026-10-13 11:28:22 UTC by Dan200 ♦9 |
| 188072093 (Comments: 5) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ow bigtu. Bisa diubah saja jadi place=locality. Tambahkan juga description=* tentang tempat itu commented 2026-10-13 11:25:48 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190326386 (Comments: 2) | Joel Hansen (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for letting me know commented 2026-10-13 11:22:19 UTC by Joel Hansen ♦21 |
| 185391706 (Comments: 5) | MaxR_6429 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Merci pour le retour, n'hésitez pas a détailler les sources utilisées dans le champ prévu lors que vous envoyez un changeset, c'est utile a tout le monde. Je vais attendre pour mettre a jour la zone pas de pa... commented 2026-10-13 11:21:52 UTC by jbcharron ♦197 |
| 180303791 (Comments: 1) | Robin Pasop (Veiligheidsregio IJsselland) (Discussed changesets: 10) | Graag niet de tag access=private verwijderen van deze wegen. Eventueel kan met emergency=yes worden aangegeven dat hulpdiensten uitgezonderd zijn van het verbod voor onbevoegden. commented 2026-10-13 11:16:32 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,226 |
| 188000825 (Comments: 1) | Robin Pasop (Veiligheidsregio IJsselland) (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dit is niet de manier om aan te geven dat de weg toegankelijk is voor hulpdiensten. Ik heb het teruggedraaid. commented 2026-10-13 11:06:26 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,226 |
| 187656088 (Comments: 1) | Yagiellon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wg tej uwagi jest trochę dalej https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5543535 commented 2026-10-13 11:06:06 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,805 |
| 190277922 (Comments: 2) | vakulya (Discussed changesets: 45) | Ha nem szándékos volt, akkor visszaállítanám. Válaszolj kérlek. commented 2026-10-13 11:05:31 UTC by BáthoryPéter ♦99 |
| 190204388 (Comments: 1) | Robin Pasop (Veiligheidsregio IJsselland) (Discussed changesets: 10) | In deze wijziging worden wegen in aanleg gewijzigd naar toegangswegen voor hulpdiensten (highway=service, service=emergency_access). Die tags zijn bedoeld voor korte doorsteken en toegangswegen als CADO's. In dit geval was de tagging als weg in ... commented 2026-10-13 11:01:10 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,226 |
| 79751150 (Comments: 1) | waldhans (Discussed changesets: 91) | Hi, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31695642 ist keine Fahrradstruktur an der Straße deswegen cycleway=no. Die Straße darf natürlich durch Radfahrer benutzt werden. Gruß, Znaika commented 2026-10-13 10:56:43 UTC by Znaika ♦232 |
| 190417586 (Comments: 3) | Aurimas Fišeras (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ačiū! Valio commented 2026-10-13 10:45:06 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,136 |
| 190445728 (Comments: 2) | Ralf Erben (Discussed changesets: 4) | "Kaum macht man', ..." commented 2026-10-13 10:38:32 UTC by ToniE ♦1,293 |
| 182121201 (Comments: 1) | brtsz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice Trees 🌳🌲🌴 commented 2026-10-13 10:38:22 UTC by Ogmios ♦65 |
| 190445465 (Comments: 1) | Ralf Erben (Discussed changesets: 4) | Das geht in dem man in iD unten links bei "Tags (8)" wo "addr:city" "..." und so weiter steht einen weiteren Eintrag macht. Einfach "office" ins linke leere Feld und "company" ins rechte leere Feld ei... commented 2026-10-13 10:34:23 UTC by ToniE ♦1,293 |
| 188830629 (Comments: 2) | Pawe1909 (Discussed changesets: 15) | This changeset was fully reverted due to a lack of response. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190445693 commented 2026-10-13 10:32:30 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,109 |
| 190438199 (Comments: 1) | Yorina93 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Yorina, Lijkt me oke. grasveldjes binnen de bebouwde kom worden meestal getagd met landuse=grass. natural=grassland wordt niet echt onderhouden. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-13 10:27:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190432130 (Comments: 2) | TranDungconthoi (Discussed changesets: 2) | @vietnam321 em dựng mặt bằng theo bản đồ quy hoạch theo iquyhoach thôi ạ. commented 2026-10-13 10:24:51 UTC by TranDungconthoi ♦1 |
| 190185027 (Comments: 1) | stadiaarcadia (Discussed changesets: 211) | Should this not be name=Hampden office_name= Barclays Hapden and why did you change the name:gd? commented 2026-10-13 10:11:22 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦393 |
| 190443931 (Comments: 1) | Ralf Erben (Discussed changesets: 4) | Falls das nicht hilft: office = company statt (oder zusätzlich zu) craft = carpenter wäre eine (nicht optimale) Lösung, die u.U. zumindest einen blauen Punkt und (falls Platz genug ist) 'name' anzeigt. &... commented 2026-10-13 10:08:47 UTC by ToniE ♦1,293 |
| 184430360 (Comments: 4) | rastapopolos (Discussed changesets: 3) | I just rang the post office to confirm exactly where it is inside the SuperValu building; the postmistress said: "Come in the main door [of SuperValu], we've a counter on the left." commented 2026-10-13 10:07:58 UTC by rastapopolos ♦3 |
| 190166201 (Comments: 1) | bwduncan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks that Edit looks good to me. It might also be worth setting the whole area the fire station building is in to construction as well. commented 2026-10-13 10:04:06 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦393 |
| 190404005 (Comments: 1) | Harry Wood (Discussed changesets: 35) | Getting my hashtags wrong. That should've been #31DayMapChallenge ! commented 2026-10-13 09:50:12 UTC by Harry Wood ♦113 |
| 190401296 (Comments: 3) | Omer2209 (Discussed changesets: 7) | השער node/13448019289 כבר מסומן barrier=gate foot=private locked=yes vehicle=private access=private אז הבעיה היא באפליקציה שלכם שלא מתחשבת בתיוג שלו. צריך לתקן את ה... commented 2026-10-13 09:49:16 UTC by hatul ♦540 |
| 189963417 (Comments: 2) | Victor LP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Added commented 2026-10-13 09:40:56 UTC by Victor LP ♦1 |
| 190439568 (Comments: 2) | Juju_kml (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I did not look at all the edits but on the parking (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204474201) you removed parking=surface and did not replace it with another parking value. When looking at the Bing aerial it looks like a surface park... commented 2026-10-13 09:31:37 UTC by Kees 59 ♦143 |
| 190351773 (Comments: 4) | KivaGeo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks, I applied your suggestion to add a description. Keeping it tagged as a restaurant as that is their more common "mode of operation" commented 2026-10-13 09:27:06 UTC by KivaGeo ♦4 |
| 190338072 (Comments: 10) | marcellinator (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-13 09:25:54 UTC by marcellinator ♦4 |
| 190434657 (Comments: 1) | Ralf Erben (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. Die Daten sind in OSM, in der Datenbank korrekt eingetragen. Alles Weitere ist Sache der Karten-(Mal-)Programme, der Renderer. Nicht jeder Renderer zeigt alles, "craft" wird recht selten auf de... commented 2026-10-13 09:16:57 UTC by ToniE ♦1,293 |
| 190338481 (Comments: 1) | palimpadum (Discussed changesets: 36) | You should use Simplify Tool in JOSM commented 2026-10-13 09:02:05 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190438026 (Comments: 1) | Bruno Arina (Discussed changesets: 3) | inserito hashtag errato dovrebbe essere #CAIOSM commented 2026-10-13 08:39:33 UTC by Bruno Arina ♦7 |
| 174759904 (Comments: 3) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 123) | Dzięki commented 2026-10-13 08:32:09 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦946 |
| 190196339 (Comments: 5) | Discount Bags & Leather Goods (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think that's just the cache from when it had the non-standard shop value. It is displaying fine for me now. You can force a fresh with something like Ctrl+Shift+F5 and it should look right. commented 2026-10-13 08:30:55 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦498 |
| 190407830 (Comments: 6) | Spyop3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, här kan du se vilka defaultvärden som gäller per vägtyp. Och du inser säkerligen att det är överflödigt att sätta foot=yes på vägar där detta värde (yes) redan gäller per def... commented 2026-10-13 08:29:48 UTC by archie ♦1,379 |
| 190418324 (Comments: 1) | mezzaroni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190438995 commented 2026-10-13 08:23:14 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190438227 (Comments: 1) | Paolo Camporotondo (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello, Thank you for adding the details to these hiking routes. Please note that Wikipedia and Wikidata are two very different things. You keep adding Wikipedia urls to the Wikidata tag. In addition to that, putting the entire url into th... commented 2026-10-13 08:20:53 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦103 |
| 168184855 (Comments: 1) | Enso eCommerce GmbH (Discussed changesets: 4) | DIeser Eintrag ist falsch, bitte herausnehmen - dort befindet sich eine Arztpraxis. VG und Danke commented 2026-10-13 08:08:49 UTC by Bernd Ritter ♦3 |
| 190387397 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 34) | It is ok like this for openstreetmap. People who need legal details can look at government maps. commented 2026-10-13 08:08:41 UTC by cuzi ♦195 |
| 190420608 (Comments: 1) | Cristianoreais (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190438341 commented 2026-10-13 08:08:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190437107 (Comments: 2) | yazou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Info samengevoegd.. Organic is geen ideale editor.. Vaak incomplete adressen. commented 2026-10-13 08:07:39 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190400386 (Comments: 2) | dodo94 (Discussed changesets: 1) | toute la rue st Nicolas est dans le même sens depuis la place st Nicolas jusqu’à la place de la liberté commented 2026-10-13 08:03:38 UTC by dodo94 ♦1 |
| 190424910 (Comments: 1) | AmanLondon (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) Welcome to OpenStreetMap. That looks fine to me. If you're adding buildings, it's worth selecting the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay in the iD editor as an aid to aligning features. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-13 07:56:36 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,955 |
| 190249511 (Comments: 2) | offissa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo MrAnderson, auf dem Straßenschild steht es mit C. War anscheinend nicht immer so, auf Fotos von 2019 ist es auf dem Schild auch noch mit K. Ich gehe davon aus, dass die Straße nach https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conradin_Kreutzer ben... commented 2026-10-13 07:53:18 UTC by offissa ♦5 |
| 190435208 (Comments: 8) | Axalian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dacht dat GraphHopper betaald was, maar als het daar wel werkt en ik die ook lokaal kan hosten dan ga ik dat gebruiken. Bedankt voor de hulp. commented 2026-10-13 07:52:14 UTC by Axalian ♦1 |
| 190383974 (Comments: 2) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 449) | Outstanding 👍 commented 2026-10-13 07:51:45 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,532 |
| 190436151 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 252) | Il y aura également un ascenseur sur le quai n°1, au même niveau. Encore merci. commented 2026-10-13 07:42:57 UTC by Berdrillon ♦1 |
| 190385018 (Comments: 2) | NasuFoito (Discussed changesets: 18) | Здравствуйте, спасибо за комментарий, я откатила пакет и добавила меньше адресов, они изначально добавлены через плагин, поэтому нет вре... commented 2026-10-13 07:34:10 UTC by NasuFoito ♦16 |
| 190436427 (Comments: 1) | cheesesteak_dk (Discussed changesets: 3) | "construction" er måske bedre? commented 2026-10-13 07:30:02 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,940 |
| 190434673 (Comments: 2) | Jonathan Corell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Taxibokningssystem som använder den här tjänsten kan inte hantera rutten när den beräknas över vattnet här. commented 2026-10-13 07:11:46 UTC by Jonathan Corell ♦1 |
| 190169609 (Comments: 1) | marco_s (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Marco, auch hier bei neu eingetragenen Wegen darauf achten, dass diese verbunden sind. Die alte Nord-Süd-Verbindung hast Du anscheinen gelöscht. Bei der neuen fehlen die Verbindungen zum Unionstr. und zum Bruayplatz. Auch der... commented 2026-10-13 07:10:25 UTC by disc24 ♦42 |
| 190435397 (Comments: 1) | snapp-map-editor (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, again, thank you for contributing to OSM. I reviewed this changeset and noticed two potentially incorrect name modifications: - Way 135432654: میدان شهدا → میدان شهدا. — an unnecessary full stop appears t... commented 2026-10-13 07:03:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190385702 (Comments: 1) | hoanganh122 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190435731 commented 2026-10-13 07:02:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
 | 190365059 (Comments: 1) | Osama Razzaq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190431825 commented 2026-10-13 07:02:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190344349 (Comments: 1) | Tenadino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190431671 commented 2026-10-13 07:01:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190349820 (Comments: 1) | 올리버 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190429920 commented 2026-10-13 07:00:54 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190360919 (Comments: 1) | Rohina karimi2022 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190429853 commented 2026-10-13 07:00:15 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190358329 (Comments: 1) | FerJhay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190429755 commented 2026-10-13 06:59:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190330180 (Comments: 1) | Hsinchu Map (Discussed changesets: 6) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190398981 commented 2026-10-13 06:58:37 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
 | 190332026 (Comments: 1) | Jjajajajaj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190398240 commented 2026-10-13 06:57:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190363439 (Comments: 1) | nazmus sakib0029 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190391421 commented 2026-10-13 06:57:03 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190366644 (Comments: 1) | Josh Blaine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190389026 commented 2026-10-13 06:56:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190330553 (Comments: 1) | BKelley324 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190384411 commented 2026-10-13 06:55:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190373984 (Comments: 1) | Jhayvee Eder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190381854 commented 2026-10-13 06:54:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 190367177 (Comments: 1) | Jhayvee Eder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190380745 commented 2026-10-13 06:53:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
| 188046274 (Comments: 1) | eliyahu bowers 𐤀𐤋𐤉𐤄𐤅 𐤁𐤅𐤅𐤓𐤎 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, In this edit you have replaces the tags of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257325757 from highway=footway + indoor=yes from highway=corridor + indoor=yes while other ways, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1552543818... commented 2026-10-13 06:51:12 UTC by zstadler ♦1,153 |
| 190434879 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 52) | Sorry, it was the phone, not the hours, that was updated. commented 2026-10-13 06:38:43 UTC by TheNightRider ♦89 |
| 190434585 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 472) | Also used the Strava Heatmap to align the path a bit. commented 2026-10-13 06:28:49 UTC by habi ♦2,283 |
| 190387672 (Comments: 1) | Nordpfeil (Discussed changesets: 79) | Hallo Nordpfeil, Im sorbischen Siedlungsgebiet (Sachsen und Brandenburg) gelten aufgrund der amtlichen Zweisprachigkeit besondere OSM-Regeln. Hier ist das Tagging von name:de ausdrücklich nicht überflüssig, sondern sogar zwingend er... commented 2026-10-13 06:23:11 UTC by kalupner ♦22 |
| 190313216 (Comments: 2) | TummyLicker (Discussed changesets: 4) | Genuinely my bad, sorry. I dont really like your comment about trans rights but whatever commented 2026-10-13 06:16:31 UTC by TummyLicker ♦3 |
| 190293486 (Comments: 2) | TummyLicker (Discussed changesets: 4) | I didn't actually see a sign saying that I just assumed it wasn't not allowed. It looked like the best option to choose in streetcomplete. I'm genuinely so stupid. I'm so sorry its all my fault. I should be more cautious with my e... commented 2026-10-13 06:14:22 UTC by TummyLicker ♦3 |
| 190312439 (Comments: 2) | TummyLicker (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ouhhh I'm sorryyy I'm so stupidd ;-; I'll try to revert my changes once I get home. Thanks for the feedback. I'm totally a newbie lol commented 2026-10-13 06:08:50 UTC by TummyLicker ♦3 |
| 190433227 (Comments: 1) | Paperwings Ventures (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for contributing to OSM and requesting a review. You added the name "Wings Turn B" to the junction. Is this a locally recognized name, such as one used on signs or by residents, or is it an internal reference? commented 2026-10-13 06:07:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190409024 (Comments: 1) | Szymoko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, mógłbyś zerknąć na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:service%20times?uselang=pl i poprawić godziny w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233296172 ? Usunąłem adresy budynku z wejść do klatek schodowych w budy... commented 2026-10-13 06:06:49 UTC by YomanNH ♦551 |
| 190433087 (Comments: 1) | Paperwings Ventures (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for contributing to OSM and requesting a review. You added the name "Wings Turn A" to the junction. Is this a locally recognized name, such as one used on signs or by residents, or is it an internal reference? commented 2026-10-13 06:06:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190370875 (Comments: 1) | Bertving (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190433076 commented 2026-10-13 05:41:28 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 187015362 (Comments: 1) | conquest59 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Landcover tagging (natural=wood) shouldn't be placed on parcel boundaries. The "woods" don't end there. commented 2026-10-13 05:26:27 UTC by TomPar ♦125 |
| 190417780 (Comments: 3) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset appears to be spam and potentially brand impersonation. The edit replaces a road's name with a company name, adds a suspicious website (royalcaribbeancruisess.com) and phone number, and overwrites TIGER metadata with addres... commented 2026-10-13 05:22:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190418005 (Comments: 3) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset appears to be spam and potentially brand impersonation. The edit replaces a road's name with a company name, adds a suspicious website (royalcaribbeancruisess.com) and phone number, and overwrites TIGER metadata with addres... commented 2026-10-13 05:22:01 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190418140 (Comments: 3) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset appears to be spam and potentially brand impersonation. The edit replaces a road's name with a company name, adds a suspicious website (royalcaribbeancruisess.com) and phone number, and overwrites TIGER metadata with addres... commented 2026-10-13 05:21:57 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190418248 (Comments: 3) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset appears to be spam and potentially brand impersonation. The edit replaces a road's name with a company name, adds a suspicious website (royalcaribbeancruisess.com) and phone number, and overwrites TIGER metadata with addres... commented 2026-10-13 05:21:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 164846213 (Comments: 1) | WUSCH1463 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Wäre für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376951738/ nicht ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:* sinnvoll? commented 2026-10-13 05:17:53 UTC by Osmwithspace ♦178 |
| 190431821 (Comments: 1) | GrabID_Lydya (Discussed changesets: 2) | harusnya restriction:motorcar=no_right_turn. Hilangkan motorcar=no commented 2026-10-13 05:14:21 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190377980 (Comments: 1) | Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this change appears to add a new node for Westlake Fire Department (with address 2000 West Dove Road). However, this location is a Southlake fire department location at 100 East Dove Road. I removed this erroneous location, and added addit... commented 2026-10-13 05:10:20 UTC by KylePolansky ♦1 |
| 190379378 (Comments: 1) | alinratna (Discussed changesets: 9) | kenapa dihapus lagi? commented 2026-10-13 05:09:15 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 189894826 (Comments: 5) | Milhouse (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'm not local, I just happened to be looking at terrace buildings. I see what you mean, it takes a certain type of person to 'get' OSM commented 2026-10-13 05:07:17 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦498 |
| 190406748 (Comments: 1) | Julian Yandra (Discussed changesets: 4) | itu semua kolam coy commented 2026-10-13 04:51:08 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190420030 (Comments: 1) | ariqqoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salam, saya sangat menyarankan Anda mencoba Tutorial Interaktif 10–15 menit di iD editor. Cukup klik tombol Edit/Sunting di web OSM, buka menu Bantuan (atau tekan H), lalu pilih Tutorial Interaktif untuk mempelajari cara membuat jalan, area, da... commented 2026-10-13 04:49:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 185985161 (Comments: 3) | gvwaal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Converted some more in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190432014 commented 2026-10-13 04:47:31 UTC by scrambling_panda ♦24 |
| 190359754 (Comments: 3) | Caleb VPI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yeah, I use OsmAnd but not for mapping--I mostly stick to SCEE on mobile and do anything more non-trivially complex in JOSM at my workstation. Awesome, glad its just like old times! I bought probably my favorite lens, "Fitty" my Yash... commented 2026-10-13 04:25:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦308 |
| 190281133 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 42) | Thanks, glad it was helpful. Happy mapping. commented 2026-10-13 04:15:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190400425 (Comments: 1) | Trinity Subsurface (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sorry, but once again this is not really correct. I'd moved the POI tags to a separate node, so this created a duplicate POI missing a primary tag. It also added back the incorrect name=* . See https://osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element <... commented 2026-10-13 04:09:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190429334 (Comments: 1) | Categorycats (Discussed changesets: 1) | Harap selesaikan tutorial iD editornya terlebih dahulu. Please complete the iD editor tutorial first. commented 2026-10-13 04:05:11 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190119866 (Comments: 7) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 98) | Come on, you know there is a opening_hours spec. You may think that PH on doesn't mean all day, but that's what it means. https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Su+unknown%3B+PH+open&lat=-35&lon=150&mod... commented 2026-10-13 04:04:32 UTC by TheSwavu ♦689 |
| 190400133 (Comments: 1) | Trinity Subsurface (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sorry, but the previous phone=* format was correct per accepted OSM conventions, while this one is not. As is documented community consensus, the standard format for NANP numbers is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN , while the E.123 format you converted it to is the... commented 2026-10-13 04:03:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190431029 (Comments: 1) | MgsMZulham (Discussed changesets: 1) | sudah dibangun? commented 2026-10-13 04:01:24 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 180817656 (Comments: 1) | KPstraightupG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey! This isn't really the best way to map this path? This is a road, if you want to add a relation to describe the path, that could be an option? Otherwise, I don't believe a separate path is mapped here and the discrete footpath should... commented 2026-10-13 03:57:27 UTC by Shrinks99 ♦26 |
| 190431003 (Comments: 1) | LarsBG (Discussed changesets: 76) | det var ved > Thorupgaardsvej 9, Voel\tSilkeborg commented 2026-10-13 03:57:20 UTC by LarsBG ♦94 |
| 178208668 (Comments: 1) | kfinity (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nice work. commented 2026-10-13 03:38:51 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦5 |
| 190420153 (Comments: 1) | 500370622 (Discussed changesets: 3) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-13 03:36:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190421720 (Comments: 1) | Мар'яна Sh (Discussed changesets: 33) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-10-13 03:32:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190429739 (Comments: 2) | imacardigandisaster (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Joel! Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Just fixed those issues. commented 2026-10-13 03:24:42 UTC by imacardigandisaster ♦1 |
| 187239300 (Comments: 7) | Ra_colate (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi Flap Slimy Outward, thanks a lot for the clarification. I understand the concern much better now. Also thank you for manually restoring some affected relations already. I’ll review all the affected relations carefully from edit histories and... commented 2026-10-13 03:14:31 UTC by Ra_colate ♦26 |
| 190406180 (Comments: 1) | Muhammad Ihsan Hadi Tanoyo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ada beberapa pilihan citra satelit yang dapat digunakan: Esri, Bing, dan Mapbox. Pilihi yang dirasa paling bagus. commented 2026-10-13 03:09:54 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190429642 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 52) | Accidentally used comments from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190429647 . For this location changed the bank name, added old_name and address, and set to office because it's not a retail bank location. commented 2026-10-13 02:43:05 UTC by TheNightRider ♦89 |
| 190429000 (Comments: 1) | schubertm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the OSM community. Your changset looks good, If you have any questions feel free to ask people or use the forum, Thank you for your first commit. : ) commented 2026-10-13 02:27:29 UTC by SPLATPLAYS ♦11 |
 | 190428314 (Comments: 1) | Berdly (Discussed changesets: 23) | I means to give this changes the tags #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 but forgot commented 2026-10-13 01:59:08 UTC by Berdly ♦24 |
| 190374219 (Comments: 1) | Cabañas Cerca Delmar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los tres últimos cambios. Los nombres de las calles y de las localidades estaban mal escritos, los corregí. El resto del etiquetado me pareció bien. Por cualqu... commented 2026-10-13 01:15:18 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦191 |
| 62791363 (Comments: 1) | 何昕88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Your edits are extremely unreliable, and these elevation tags look absurd. I believe you lack an understanding of the OSM community guidelines. If you do not respond to my discussion thread for a long time, I will delete everything you have mapped in... commented 2026-10-13 01:09:29 UTC by michaelIsADullGuy ♦14 |
| 190375076 (Comments: 1) | xaviargento (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, revisé estos cambios también. El edificio es una cosa y el negocio es otra. El edificio estaba bien como estaba, no lo tendrías que haber modificado. building:levels=0 no está bien, significa que no hay nada s... commented 2026-10-13 01:08:00 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦191 |
| 190375171 (Comments: 1) | xaviargento (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Reevisé estos cambios. Si el edificio es building=service, no debería ser una oficina o negocio, que es lo que parece ser por el nombre. Alguna de las dos etiquetas no parece estar bien.... commented 2026-10-13 01:00:10 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦191 |
| 190403808 (Comments: 1) | Diego Volpe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revertido en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190428002. Hola. Hice cambios en tu edición pasada y te dejé un comentario sobre por qué los hacía. Por favor, no los deshagas sin explicar el por qué. ... commented 2026-10-13 00:45:08 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦191 |
| 190356693 (Comments: 5) | Hélène et Franck (Discussed changesets: 1) | Boa noite AntMadeiea, a pagina da Internet é https://lescaleauportugal@gmail.com. Muito obrigada. commented 2026-10-12 23:45:10 UTC by Hélène et Franck ♦1 |
| 190426080 (Comments: 1) | TheRadScientist (Discussed changesets: 3) | Noted that there were conflicting tags between being a cycleway and a railway. Determined that active transportation applications do not properly route cyclists across this bridge, likely stemming from the conflicting tags. I have therefore separat... commented 2026-10-12 23:06:57 UTC by TheRadScientist ♦3 |
| 190425441 (Comments: 1) | LowSpec (Discussed changesets: 2) | Perhaps int_name would be a better fit since "Makkah" is semi-officially used on road signs? commented 2026-10-12 22:30:07 UTC by LowSpec ♦3 |
 | 190425445 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 146) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 190305633, 190318147, 190334958, 190340838. commented 2026-10-12 22:15:28 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190318147 (Comments: 1) | Pooshti-road (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190425445 where the changeset comment is: revert dubious edits made with nonsense changeset comments commented 2026-10-12 22:15:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190340838 (Comments: 1) | Pooshti-road (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190425445 where the changeset comment is: revert dubious edits made with nonsense changeset comments commented 2026-10-12 22:15:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190334958 (Comments: 2) | Pooshti-road (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190425445 where the changeset comment is: revert dubious edits made with nonsense changeset comments commented 2026-10-12 22:15:27 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190305633 (Comments: 1) | Pooshti-road (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190425445 where the changeset comment is: revert dubious edits made with nonsense changeset comments commented 2026-10-12 22:15:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 186084458 (Comments: 2) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 167) | Hey Victor, These changes were made by Anne here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90907363 (or in an earlier changeset which is obscured by unrelated changes but this is unlikely based on the changeset comment) This is a fr... commented 2026-10-12 22:14:08 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦750 |
| 190424657 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 238) | JOSM mi zjadł część opisu - Ujednolicenie znaczników buspasów na al. Piłsudskiego commented 2026-10-12 22:03:15 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦946 |
| 190421383 (Comments: 2) | NV333 (Discussed changesets: 5) | There are 2 separate trail heads mapped. Before, the relation contained one whole trail section from south trailhead to end of trail marker, plus the other short section from northern trailhead. I made a separate relation from each trailhead, as they... commented 2026-10-12 22:02:42 UTC by NV333 ♦0 |
| 190424954 (Comments: 1) | thebrad1111 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Also used streetside commented 2026-10-12 21:55:22 UTC by thebrad1111 ♦20 |
| 188893984 (Comments: 1) | 7lima (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo 7lima! Hier das gleiche mit den Knoten wie in Eisenbahnstraße beim Frisör Gia Hommes & Femmes by Mohammed Jawad. Da gab es schon einen Knoten mit construction:shop=yes. Scheint in dem Editor, den du benutzt hast, wohl nicht an... commented 2026-10-12 21:30:05 UTC by goodidea ♦161 |
| 190424120 (Comments: 1) | NxPFoto (Discussed changesets: 31) | *source= only Mapbox Satellite no local knowledge used commented 2026-10-12 21:25:23 UTC by NxPFoto ♦30 |
| 190423811 (Comments: 1) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | +source: auch auf luftbild sichtbar commented 2026-10-12 21:19:13 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 190268959 (Comments: 3) | Glyphe (Discussed changesets: 5) | Exactly, I hope that's fine for you :) I felt a node would be more adequate in that case. commented 2026-10-12 21:16:39 UTC by Glyphe ♦23 |
| 187608082 (Comments: 3) | DiaouligRu (Discussed changesets: 25) | Bonjour, J’avais renseigné ce chemin à partir du plan minute de remembrement de Rosnoën, où il apparaît comme « Chemin de Remembrement », avec une emprise distincte et non numérotée... commented 2026-10-12 21:15:37 UTC by DiaouligRu ♦18 |
| 190316300 (Comments: 2) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 150) | Alles guet, gaht mer amigs glich ;) commented 2026-10-12 21:10:32 UTC by Piagno ♦152 |
| 189200768 (Comments: 1) | MADF1968 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Es posible que hayas añadido información personal sin querer en el mapa mediante esta edición. Si en esa dirección existe efectivamente un parking público, deberías etiquetarlo con su nombre cor... commented 2026-10-12 21:03:47 UTC by Johnbo ♦33 |
| 183376779 (Comments: 1) | 7lima (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo! Du hast in der Eisenbahnstraße den Frisör Gia Hommes & Femmes by Mohammed Jawad als neuen Knoten angelegt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13894826002). Dort gab es aber bereits einen Knoten dafür mit construction:shop=h... commented 2026-10-12 21:03:25 UTC by goodidea ♦161 |
| 190359669 (Comments: 1) | Paco 34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Paco 34 y bienvenido a OSM, Las fuentes de agua potable se etiquetan con amenity=drinking_water. Puedes encontrar más información en la Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=drinking_water), donde tienes ejem... commented 2026-10-12 20:47:43 UTC by dmlls ♦34 |
| 169997197 (Comments: 8) | Jaka Kranjc (Discussed changesets: 6) | Komunala me še kar ignorira, tako da uredim, ko se vrnem s potovanja. commented 2026-10-12 20:44:24 UTC by Jaka Kranjc ♦8 |
| 190340561 (Comments: 2) | Ken Kambi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Let me check and update commented 2026-10-12 20:39:24 UTC by Ken Kambi ♦2 |
| 189840052 (Comments: 1) | eimimue (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, du hast hier am Gebäude das check_date=* aktualisiert. Es gibt hier aber einen Hinweis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5561924), dass es das Gebäude gar nicht mehr geben soll. Kannst du dazu was sagen, gibt es das tatsächlich... commented 2026-10-12 20:31:35 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦355 |
| 190419141 (Comments: 1) | Corsa5 (Discussed changesets: 160) | Hello. I reverted this change because the satellite imagery is not current. The crossing has changed recently on the ground. Also, next time, try to write comments to changesets at least in English, because Azores is not in Russia. Regar... commented 2026-10-12 20:29:48 UTC by AntMadeira ♦273 |
| 190389956 (Comments: 2) | Electro Moped (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, I'm still learning how to use OpenStreetMap. I don't know all the nuances yet. commented 2026-10-12 20:22:17 UTC by Electro Moped ♦1 |
| 190403339 (Comments: 2) | isotopicemoting (Discussed changesets: 8) | Oh thanks. Sometimes noteSolver just doesn't work. commented 2026-10-12 20:18:55 UTC by isotopicemoting ♦18 |
| 189289860 (Comments: 3) | Disaster2life (Discussed changesets: 2) | oh oops- seems you had already fixed it! Thanks a lot! my apologies! commented 2026-10-12 20:14:22 UTC by Disaster2life ♦2 |
| 190421218 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo Soldani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrección: esta es la parte 2 de 4 (bunkers) commented 2026-10-12 20:10:59 UTC by Eduardo Soldani ♦1 |
| 190420217 (Comments: 3) | Gerdev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb wat landuse aangepast. Je changeset is zo grootgeworden omdat je iets hebt gedaan met een administratieve grens. Je edits https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=190420217#17/53.21639/6.28491 commented 2026-10-12 19:58:59 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 184309999 (Comments: 1) | 123qwe321 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не удаляйте заведения вместе со зданием. Здания-то скорее всего на месте остаются commented 2026-10-12 19:56:27 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,786 |
| 190317742 (Comments: 2) | niboe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, the address clarification is especially needed in High Point, where every street is named "East High Point" with a suffix except Southgate, so houses often have duplicate numbers and the name suffix matters. commented 2026-10-12 19:18:23 UTC by Closeapple ♦3 |
| 190362702 (Comments: 1) | cranik (Discussed changesets: 8) | Typ użytkowania obszaru nie jest od dawania na budynki. commented 2026-10-12 19:16:34 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦453 |
| 190278289 (Comments: 1) | Christoph Stieger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Christoph Ich bin wegen deinem angefragten Review hier. Du hast hier beim Departement 66 den Facebook-Link entfernt, der noch funktioniert, die Webseite aber belassen, die nicht mehr funktioniert. Kann der Facebook-Link nicht bleiben, ... commented 2026-10-12 19:15:03 UTC by habi ♦2,283 |
| 182794558 (Comments: 5) | klnkengi (Discussed changesets: 40) | Okay, danke. Vom Klausdamm kommend ist das Zusatzschild zu sehen. Man könnte nun meinen, die Gemeinde wollte bewusst Anlieger zwingen, lediglich von Süden einzufahren. Das könnte man sogar erfassen. Glaube ich aber nicht: Weite... commented 2026-10-12 19:06:05 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 190408867 (Comments: 1) | vb98 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao. Il tag barrier=hedge rappresenta una siepe. Mentre queste non lo sono. Sembrano di più filari di alberi (natural=tree_row). Ciao, Andrea --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2026-10-12 19:04:53 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,546 |
| 190224906 (Comments: 2) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Thank you for checking. This is the verified official operational service location and contact point for Royal Caribbean Cruises (https://royalcaribbeancruisess.com | Phone: +1-833-912-2268). All details are accurate commented 2026-10-12 19:03:31 UTC by Royal Caribbean ♦5 |
| 46624478 (Comments: 3) | Mirecnet (Discussed changesets: 155) | Potom je otazka si s malym ci velkym S :) A mozno do loc_name. Ale dakujem za vysvetlenie. commented 2026-10-12 18:55:52 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
| 121267119 (Comments: 2) | VA00 (Discussed changesets: 152) | Zaczęli już budowę? commented 2026-10-12 18:55:29 UTC by VA00 ♦664 |
| 55872547 (Comments: 3) | Mirecnet (Discussed changesets: 155) | Nevidim zmenu. Ale potom by to mohlo byt embankment:type=rampart : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embankment:type commented 2026-10-12 18:54:41 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,072 |
| 190405105 (Comments: 5) | Matthijs van der Kolk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb het als bovenstaand aangepast. commented 2026-10-12 18:53:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190400385 (Comments: 1) | lenael (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, OSM n'est pas un outil pour mettre des sujets personnel ou vulgaire. Votre contribution doit être supprimée car non avenue. Les données personnelles, inappropriées ou vulgaires n'y ont pas leur place. commented 2026-10-12 18:51:57 UTC by Patrick78 ♦36 |
| 190361991 (Comments: 13) | RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek (Discussed changesets: 10) | Yes ga ik doen, brandweer heeft nu in liveNav aangepast, als zijn het kunnen moet het mij ook lukken. Ambu is 230 cm trouwens. Thanks commented 2026-10-12 18:51:34 UTC by RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek ♦6 |
| 188655426 (Comments: 11) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 34) | Duden that you linked above, is an example of a link proving only that an (old) name exists not that it is still commonly used. Therefore such links are not helpful, as already told many times to you/Ótzï, also by several other users in C... commented 2026-10-12 18:47:17 UTC by Pikse ♦250 |
| 190255004 (Comments: 1) | Eeladona (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216547511 more a path than a residential road alignment needs an update commented 2026-10-12 18:38:54 UTC by rab ♦589 |
| 190404189 (Comments: 3) | skohel (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK, thanks for letting me know. commented 2026-10-12 18:37:11 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
| 189185756 (Comments: 1) | Fuse84 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The alt_name tag can contain multiple alternative names separated by semicolons (;), as documented in the OSM Wiki. I have restored the previously existing Arabic alternative names, as having multiple names in a single alt_name value is valid ... commented 2026-10-12 18:36:42 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦769 |
| 190326488 (Comments: 1) | PomeloOnPizza (Discussed changesets: 12) | Can you explain why you upgraded this to secondary? This is quite literally a dirt road through the mountains, and it hasn't been a state highway in quite some time. I'm of the opinion that no dirt roads should be any higher than tertiary, ... commented 2026-10-12 18:28:44 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦67 |
| 189169017 (Comments: 1) | LowSpec (Discussed changesets: 2) | شكرا لك commented 2026-10-12 18:25:11 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦769 |
| 190365465 (Comments: 5) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 341) | Postaram się. commented 2026-10-12 18:14:47 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦311 |
| 190384230 (Comments: 1) | seatoucan (Discussed changesets: 2) | The `construction=residential` of `landuse=construction` refers to the `landuse=residential` it will become. `landuse=dormitory` isn't used, only at most `residential=dormitory` but there are problems and unresolved questions about it. commented 2026-10-12 18:13:02 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190381151 (Comments: 1) | seatoucan (Discussed changesets: 2) | As it's the law, there's no need to add `smoking=no` commented 2026-10-12 18:11:32 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190265973 (Comments: 2) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 13) | All good- Apologies for mistake! commented 2026-10-12 18:11:13 UTC by xanderthemapper31 ♦11 |
| 190387200 (Comments: 4) | Patrick Dörn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Super, danke ... commented 2026-10-12 18:01:41 UTC by tux67 ♦2,078 |
| 190415496 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 167) | Plus przeniesienie przyszłościowo nazwy kompleksu na label, by nazwa nie krążyła docelowo między różnymi obszarami. commented 2026-10-12 18:00:12 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦453 |
| 190361415 (Comments: 1) | Irish1987 (Discussed changesets: 5) | When joining fairways and greens, make sure you share every node at the border. You are doing pretty good, but have missed about 10-20 here on this course and that trips out Q/A checks because of the overlap (even by a tiny amount). Your help to make... commented 2026-10-12 17:55:01 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
| 190386230 (Comments: 1) | GasaiYuno (Discussed changesets: 69) | This is only a phase of the estate, so better avoid using `residential=apartments` commented 2026-10-12 17:53:27 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 174743060 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 112) | for features like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451157802 you want to tag the whole area as amenity=parking the individual spaces can be be tagged additionally as amenity=parking_space. Street_side is not used in a parking lot but instead along ... commented 2026-10-12 17:47:39 UTC by nickvet419 ♦115 |
| 190371750 (Comments: 1) | Nic Jensen (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567465148 and others When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway out... commented 2026-10-12 17:47:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
| 190414739 (Comments: 1) | BMIA88 (Discussed changesets: 4) | thank you :) 👍 Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-12 17:40:44 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 190411382 (Comments: 4) | BMIA88 (Discussed changesets: 4) | that doesn't matter to the fact that the ALPR was attached to it and shouldn't have been. In iD if you click on the "Map Data" tab on the right side (shortcut "u") and scroll down to the "Map Features" list... commented 2026-10-12 17:37:57 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 190406417 (Comments: 1) | julian_neuhierl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, danke für diese Teilkorrektur. Dennoch: Es sind keine Löschwasserbehälter und die Namen sind auch nicht okay. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-12 17:37:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 160003716 (Comments: 5) | MicDK (Discussed changesets: 76) | Den slags, som jeg tænker på, plejer der ikke at være buskads på, da de står i de i skyggefulde skove. Og det er som regel graven - frem for volden ved siden af - som man lægger mærke til. Det er ikke sikk... commented 2026-10-12 17:33:38 UTC by cyclist789 ♦155 |
| 189506162 (Comments: 3) | gsgan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok. I guadi per definizione sono passaggi dove è possibile bagnarsi le scarpe. In montagna, quale sia la stagione (bhe, non con la neve e sottozero!) io porto un paio di calze di ricambio. Un escursionista (esperto?) quando vede sulla... commented 2026-10-12 17:31:03 UTC by Jrachi ♦850 |
| 187811302 (Comments: 2) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 5) | And I should have noted - if you want to improve the shapes of things that are already there, feel free to do so. Just please edit the existing thing, or at least make sure you carry over whatever existing information has already been tagged, unless... commented 2026-10-12 17:28:57 UTC by noliver ♦9 |
| 33720756 (Comments: 7) | MicDK (Discussed changesets: 76) | Mærkatet source=* på objekter er kun sjældent nødvendigt. Men det er en god ide at indtaste sine kilder i den menu, hvor man uploader sit "changeset". Det hjælper folk til at vide, hvor meget de skal st... commented 2026-10-12 17:28:16 UTC by cyclist789 ♦155 |
| 190409712 (Comments: 5) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Die Eingänge im Landeskrankenhaus sind mit addr:unit versehen, weil die Orientierung über den Buchstaben und die Eingangsnummer erfolgt. Einige Abteilungen sind dort unstrukturiert auf verschiedene Gebäude aufgeteilt. commented 2026-10-12 17:24:52 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 190411627 (Comments: 1) | BMIA88 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This ALPR is attached to a landuse area and ALPR's should not be attached to landuse areas commented 2026-10-12 17:23:28 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 190410467 (Comments: 2) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Kommentiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190409712#map=19/47.806996/13.031376&layers=N commented 2026-10-12 17:21:33 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 190409789 (Comments: 2) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Kommentiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190409712#map=19/47.806996/13.031376&layers=N commented 2026-10-12 17:21:26 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 190409569 (Comments: 1) | codywindrose (Discussed changesets: 4) | It looks messy commented 2026-10-12 17:18:22 UTC by Vitorperrut555 ♦1 |
| 190413861 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 31) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-10-12 17:17:08 UTC by sahshoor ♦38 |
| 190411301 (Comments: 1) | BMIA88 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-12 17:16:57 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 190145422 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | @kingkingHK commented 2026-10-12 17:16:12 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190412724 (Comments: 2) | TacitusHCH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, du hast natürlich recht. Ich habe grade auch angefangen und kannte das Kürzel für Feiertage noch nicht :) Und ich finde es auch toll, dass es da noch mehr Leute in Hechingen gibt! commented 2026-10-12 17:16:12 UTC by TacitusHCH ♦1 |
| 190381489 (Comments: 1) | Janis! (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jūs? https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21391 commented 2026-10-12 17:11:55 UTC by Colbertson ♦183 |
| 190238149 (Comments: 4) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 86) | It's part of the `=harbour_basin` https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10599237 commented 2026-10-12 17:11:25 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 184316700 (Comments: 2) | rild leka (Discussed changesets: 6) | Pershendetje Donovaly, Duke te falenderuar per mireseardhjen, dua te bie dakord me ty per kontributoret aktive. Te falenderoj per ndryshimet e bera ne zonen Gjokaj, Domje, por dua te them qe ka pak kohe qe kam dashur ta prek perseri si zone... commented 2026-10-12 17:09:43 UTC by rild leka ♦7 |
| 189361843 (Comments: 1) | Thiago AG (Discussed changesets: 10) | Caro Thiago AG, Conforme a regra de classificação viária [1], Elias Fausto, por ter população menor que 20 mil habitantes, tem direito a ter rotas secundárias partindo dele para cidades maiores e, no m... commented 2026-10-12 17:04:42 UTC by santamariense ♦867 |
| 190408188 (Comments: 3) | hsfre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Sorry to say that your new cycleway section Way: 1567685837 still does not connect to the Way: Midland Road (35032400). The two ways have to physically connect with a joining node. The same manner that you joined the two cycleway sections togethe... commented 2026-10-12 16:58:21 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,398 |
| 189434400 (Comments: 5) | Scroogey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay verstehe. Wenn die Gemeinde unzulässige Beschilderungen vor Ort aufstellt, können wir das nicht korrekt so erfassen, wie es gemeint ist. Die einzige Lösung des Problems wäre die Gemeinde zu bitten, das Dilemma zu bese... commented 2026-10-12 16:54:24 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 137398071 (Comments: 2) | This Is A Display Name Desu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Indeed, I will correct that it's `admin_level=6` being the problem. Currently, we have a few `=suburb` tested as `=9` , so following the `=quarter` would make it behind. However, what I tentatively compiled have found `=village` / `=hamlet` ... commented 2026-10-12 16:51:10 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190400844 (Comments: 1) | eifionj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bore da Diolch for your edit, however the waterfall is already mapped. I have added name:cy to the existing object and removed the duplication. Diolch Phil commented 2026-10-12 16:49:39 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,864 |
| 185907166 (Comments: 1) | Own Oh (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477832007/ This seems confused. * ruins:building=Kilgarvan House is misphrased. * The house name appears to be Kilgarve House. * The tagged object seems to just be the walls on the kitchen... commented 2026-10-12 16:45:31 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,282 |
| 189884425 (Comments: 13) | Shinsplints (Discussed changesets: 15) | Eerib, You’re offer is a sham. You spread lies to support your actions. You want to be able to map everything regardless of the consequences. Many people who are affected by your actions resent and are angry with you. If an ef... commented 2026-10-12 16:31:48 UTC by Shinsplints ♦11 |
| 189563102 (Comments: 2) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo 👋, da_real! PM ist auf dem Weg! Grüße Andreas commented 2026-10-12 16:29:53 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦214 |
| 190403699 (Comments: 1) | Hubert12345 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Twoja jakość edycji jest fatalna - obszary zachodzą na siebie, brak informacji, o źródle zmian (co to za obszar budowy?). Wycofuję. commented 2026-10-12 16:24:28 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,011 |
| 190091636 (Comments: 2) | ramthelinefeed (Discussed changesets: 70) | I wouldn't have thought so? What makes you say that? This is tertiary highway relation. (Or am I very confused?) commented 2026-10-12 16:19:42 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦95 |
| 190381031 (Comments: 1) | BeanBrainzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have removed personal information. OSM does not allow the addition of personal information to protect the privacy of individuals. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190381031 ... commented 2026-10-12 16:04:10 UTC by Glassman ♦6,051 |
| 190075377 (Comments: 3) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 157) | This story is what prompted me to do these changes, this refers to Northland's Pakaraka rather than this location. Hence why we got to use split naming here. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/pakaraka-school-becomes-first-state-school-to-convert-to-... commented 2026-10-12 15:51:12 UTC by EleGlobe ♦14 |
| 190387667 (Comments: 1) | Kemal Özer 12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Lütfen gerçeğe aykırı düzenlemeler yapmayınız. Değişikliklerinizi geri aldım. İyi günler. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190409422 commented 2026-10-12 15:49:35 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦290 |
| 190370784 (Comments: 1) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 173) | Moin :) fällt diese Relation nicht unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen/Relationen_sind_keine_Kategorien ? Grüße silversurfer83 --- Publis... commented 2026-10-12 15:38:07 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190388664 (Comments: 1) | caro_schnu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :) Danke, dass du hilfst die sich ständig wandelnde Welt der POI aktuell zu halten. Bei einigen dieser Läden hast du sie ja auf shop=vacant geändert, was schon ganz gut passt, wenn do... commented 2026-10-12 15:35:40 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 140592581 (Comments: 1) | Martin868 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Bonjour, je sais, ce n'est pas vous pas comme vous êtes le dernier à être passé sur l'objet : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242081004 dock ne me semble pas correct ici (Sorry read the locale too late) commented 2026-10-12 15:20:42 UTC by trial ♦1,218 |
| 189807177 (Comments: 1) | rat_lorand_grab (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, Il y a beaucoup d'erreurs dans la carte introduites par ce changeset. Je n'ai pas tout regardé en détail mais au croisement de l'Av. de la République et de l'Av. G. Pompidou ça ne va pas du ... commented 2026-10-12 15:13:57 UTC by josmougn ♦279 |
| 190394932 (Comments: 1) | aherok (Discussed changesets: 1) | w zasadzie już było wprowadzone https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12723086596 commented 2026-10-12 15:09:36 UTC by dzamper ♦289 |
| 190407015 (Comments: 1) | dwiniarsk92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | oops meant to say St Rita commented 2026-10-12 14:56:37 UTC by dwiniarsk92 ♦1 |
| 189438299 (Comments: 1) | rat_lorand_grab (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, J'ai fait un revert du changeset 189438299. En effet, ce secteur a été refait et l'imagerie aérienne n'est pas à jour. Avant de faire vos modifications vous devriez vérifier l'h... commented 2026-10-12 14:54:37 UTC by josmougn ♦279 |
| 190085642 (Comments: 7) | jhingea (Discussed changesets: 5) | Correct btw, If you first load the Task grid and then your changeset, it appears direct. Best regards commented 2026-10-12 14:53:46 UTC by Frans S ♦11,053 |
| 188159446 (Comments: 1) | SteveRal (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Steve, these ramps are not open yet and MDTA has reached out to OpenStreetMap to figure out why routing companies that use OSM are sending their customers here. Did you happen to survey this in person to know if it was open? Thanks, ... commented 2026-10-12 14:42:13 UTC by ElliottPlack ♦953 |
| 190393513 (Comments: 2) | h0m54r (Discussed changesets: 1) | I had no idea that was an option, diolch Ceirios! Kanade commented 2026-10-12 14:42:04 UTC by h0m54r ♦1 |
 | 190402718 (Comments: 1) | Emerucha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome back! commented 2026-10-12 14:41:12 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦28 |
| 186206390 (Comments: 1) | EJVibes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi EJVibes, thanks for adding to the Shropshire area. Just to let you know that I've replaced the service roads with bus parking spaces as highways should not be used when there is no physical separation https://www.openstreetmap.org/chan... commented 2026-10-12 14:31:29 UTC by ohmanger ♦54 |
| 190393110 (Comments: 1) | SLMLS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, you’ve added the name of the site in the names of some of the buildings you added (e.g., Birsan Tatil Sitesi). To add residential complexes (sites), use the tags landuse=residential + residential=apartments. After drawing the area of a ... commented 2026-10-12 14:30:44 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦290 |
| 187413814 (Comments: 3) | Rufus_ID (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke, hab es angepasst commented 2026-10-12 14:29:55 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 190404088 (Comments: 1) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 51) | This should say "from secondary to tertiary", whoops! commented 2026-10-12 14:00:21 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦67 |
| 186301660 (Comments: 3) | jerem0808 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das ging sogar etwas schneller als *ich* gedacht habe: Heute, nur knapp 2 Monate später ist da ein Veloladen drin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190398885 commented 2026-10-12 13:51:49 UTC by habi ♦2,283 |
| 1063399 (Comments: 1) | Daniel S (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ein von dir eingetragener Feldweg wurde vorgestern durch einen Newbie gelöscht, weil es ihn nicht mehr gebe. Auf dem Luftbild ist er aber gut zu erkennen. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=190296050#15/54.8124... commented 2026-10-12 13:40:43 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,284 |
| 190377219 (Comments: 1) | Ikbal Harun (Discussed changesets: 3) | Pakai citra satelit Esri. Tata letak bangunan sebelumnya itu sudah benar. Selain itu, harap menyelesaikan tutorial interaktif iD editor-nya. commented 2026-10-12 13:34:21 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190363037 (Comments: 1) | BERGarbeiter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast in diesem Änderungssatz die Querungsmöglichkeit über den Plan zwischen den Gebäuden Hallescher Str. 1 und 2 gelöscht (vgl. note/5502162). Grafische Differenzdarstellung: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/o... commented 2026-10-12 13:33:06 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,284 |
| 190393353 (Comments: 1) | Topiours (Discussed changesets: 4) | 刚才在灯彩街古墩路附近产生了编辑冲突，后庙可能需要核实情况。 commented 2026-10-12 13:29:32 UTC by Herman Lee ♦415 |
| 173889370 (Comments: 1) | F-T-P (Discussed changesets: 1) | removed (pole included) as of 10/12/2026 commented 2026-10-12 13:25:14 UTC by SigmaBing ♦1 |
| 189946223 (Comments: 2) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 77) | Habs gefixt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190402076. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis commented 2026-10-12 13:21:04 UTC by stirps ♦69 |
| 190391630 (Comments: 3) | Mira Rawet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Inget som jag kommer på så här på rak arm commented 2026-10-12 13:17:02 UTC by Snusmumriken ♦166 |
| 190399639 (Comments: 1) | mangerlahn (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry, falscher Beschreibungstext, ich hab hier Details am Parkbogen Ost hinzugefügt. commented 2026-10-12 13:15:23 UTC by mangerlahn ♦30 |
| 190374191 (Comments: 1) | Mo-Sa1410 (Discussed changesets: 8) | are you aware of https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenimport-azaniq/146667 ? commented 2026-10-12 13:02:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190382966 (Comments: 1) | Mo-Sa1410 (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://azaniq.at/moscheen/115014 is not website of this mosque are you aware of https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenimport-azaniq/146667 ? commented 2026-10-12 12:58:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190369300 (Comments: 5) | neilwarnock (Discussed changesets: 2) | Forget it then. I won't be doing any more editing in future. commented 2026-10-12 12:49:52 UTC by neilwarnock ♦1 |
| 181877582 (Comments: 1) | Rachael Mackenzie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are the cycle prohibitions on stretches of the A9 permanent, or just during the roundabout works? As it is mapped, cyclists approaching the prohibited section are also prohibited from taking the exit slip road. This seems unlikely. commented 2026-10-12 12:49:31 UTC by Pete Owens ♦91 |
| 173808044 (Comments: 1) | tranquillity (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, falls dieser Weg mit VZ 260 + landw. Verkehr frei beschildert ist, dann bitte bei hw=track belassen. Das ist der dafür übliche Tag. Problematisch ist hier, dass hw=cycleway den Weg für Fußgänger sperrt und Rou... commented 2026-10-12 12:36:35 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 189631729 (Comments: 1) | Ercole Savio (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Ercole, Did you check this locally? None of the official information mentions this address for a fire station. commented 2026-10-12 12:36:03 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,569 |
| 190376175 (Comments: 2) | Monolo23 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Buenas, lo cambio ahora mismo Gracias commented 2026-10-12 12:31:21 UTC by Monolo23 ♦18 |
| 189289205 (Comments: 1) | Drzewo29 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hej, Jakie jest źródło tej czeskiej nazwy? Nie znalazłem ani jednego źródła które by jej używało. commented 2026-10-12 12:17:56 UTC by Yunkers ♦441 |
| 184841845 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_RouteMirror (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I see that you changed a crossing ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1342151719 ) from crossing=traffic_signals to crossing-unmarked The dotted markings used at most signalised crossings in the UK are clearly visible in the curren... commented 2026-10-12 12:10:46 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,955 |
| 190361189 (Comments: 1) | Wess-bzr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, attention de ne pas confondre outer et inner et de ne pas mettre d'attributs sur le membre outer. J'ai corrigé ta relation 21615698, mais il serait bien que tu (re)lises la page wiki sur les multipolygones http... commented 2026-10-12 12:05:12 UTC by Yunan973 ♦182 |
| 190333605 (Comments: 1) | tubeless (Discussed changesets: 5) | Kenapa tag access=destination dihapus? bukankah sebelumnya benar? :) commented 2026-10-12 11:59:21 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190385408 (Comments: 1) | Zero 991 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tokoweb apa? commented 2026-10-12 11:47:53 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190367462 (Comments: 1) | Waypoint47 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190396716 commented 2026-10-12 11:45:07 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 189575301 (Comments: 1) | FilipBG (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdravo Filipe BG, Da li možeš da proveriš promene na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5039565519. Tu je sad pola tagova za Lili, a pola tagova je ostalo od NLB banke. Trebalo bi da se sredi, da svi tagovi budu za Lili, ako NLB... commented 2026-10-12 11:31:26 UTC by MaliMrav ♦93 |
| 190373736 (Comments: 1) | Bruno8738 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190395565 commented 2026-10-12 11:24:42 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190360969 (Comments: 3) | PeeWee32 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Prima, ik heb nu nog een paar restanten verwijderd. Groet, Dick commented 2026-10-12 11:17:21 UTC by dvdhoven ♦997 |
| 183415058 (Comments: 1) | Drzewo29 (Discussed changesets: 7) | nie dodawaj tłumaczeń nazw miejsc które nazw po polsku nie mają commented 2026-10-12 10:57:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190391881 (Comments: 2) | jqngarcia (Discussed changesets: 28) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190393600 commented 2026-10-12 10:49:20 UTC by Robot8A ♦96 |
| 148621046 (Comments: 3) | NyanSten (Discussed changesets: 78) | Cool, thanks for the link, and nice work on documenting the list of translations commented 2026-10-12 10:43:38 UTC by CoyKoi ♦238 |
| 190208902 (Comments: 3) | Rommar (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merci pour votre retour rapide, nous sommes un des rares pays a utiliser ce schéma mais on y tient car il a des avantages vous n'êtes pas le seul a être au courant, nous travaillons a me faire connaître plus largement. <... commented 2026-10-12 10:40:18 UTC by jbcharron ♦197 |
| 189192660 (Comments: 5) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 18) | baiklah commented 2026-10-12 10:31:02 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 86299787 (Comments: 1) | NilbogAus (Discussed changesets: 4) | HI, I don't think the guideposts should be tagged wit the name of the route. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:information%3Dguidepost#a_guidepost's_name_? They should be included in the route relation like: ... commented 2026-10-12 10:30:34 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,799 |
| 190313997 (Comments: 3) | gordo anorexico (Discussed changesets: 68) | vale, gracias commented 2026-10-12 10:29:30 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190392415 (Comments: 1) | PeeWee32 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Correctie comment; Niet bestaande routerelaties verwijderd. Gecheckt in het veld... zijn echt weg. commented 2026-10-12 10:22:13 UTC by PeeWee32 ♦49 |
| 190390693 (Comments: 1) | Coast to Coast Remodel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Spam commented 2026-10-12 10:18:58 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190366370 (Comments: 3) | ereere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @ajmat commented 2026-10-12 10:18:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 180587791 (Comments: 1) | Spas_Kolev (Discussed changesets: 6) | Има по-нови сателитни снимки на ESRI (може би и тези са от септември м.г.), които показват строежи и даже няколко нови сгради. На МЗХ снимките(... commented 2026-10-12 10:17:35 UTC by Fraxi ♦523 |
| 190375562 (Comments: 1) | MonteTitano (Discussed changesets: 3) | living_street --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190375562 commented 2026-10-12 10:13:34 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190387926 (Comments: 1) | Henrik Friis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You correctly tagged the deleted task, Please also remove the buildings without proof from the imagery. Other imageries show a few buildings, but the most recent, do not. Instructions Quote: 3. Delete a ... commented 2026-10-12 10:09:46 UTC by Frans S ♦11,053 |
| 190342810 (Comments: 1) | Teepolku (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190391718 commented 2026-10-12 10:06:59 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190377502 (Comments: 1) | MonteTitano (Discussed changesets: 3) | private --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190377502 commented 2026-10-12 10:06:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 145723721 (Comments: 3) | bitfix (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thx commented 2026-10-12 09:50:53 UTC by fs_LT ♦285 |
| 190388920 (Comments: 2) | Academie voor Ambulancezorg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Als bovenstaand gecorrigeerd. commented 2026-10-12 09:40:55 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190367315 (Comments: 1) | Jhayvee Eder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190390011 commented 2026-10-12 09:32:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190220844 (Comments: 1) | neilwarnock (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/190388841 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert under ticket 2026101210000267 commented 2026-10-12 09:18:57 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,864 |
| 190358181 (Comments: 2) | Mond00 (Discussed changesets: 88) | ist korrigiert commented 2026-10-12 09:13:08 UTC by Mond00 ♦86 |
| 190351179 (Comments: 1) | Marco-Glider (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Marco This change has destoryed the Bus route 315 from Cavergno. The other direction has been OK. I have fixed the destroyed bus route. Small thing until on remarkes what happend. I think it is an tool error. You cutted way parts. Normally ... commented 2026-10-12 09:11:22 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦58 |
| 190248431 (Comments: 2) | bluestarfish (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks @FajrAl ! commented 2026-10-12 08:55:34 UTC by bluestarfish ♦2 |
| 190240777 (Comments: 3) | Aleksandrs Orlovs (Discussed changesets: 1) | This sounds like an issue with Komoot. These tracks are marked as sand and as soft grade 5 which should basically be the lowest priority for anything that routes. I don't think there is anything on OSM we can do to fix this. You would have to co... commented 2026-10-12 08:42:09 UTC by HellMap ♦1,002 |
| 190386796 (Comments: 1) | Fopper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Top! commented 2026-10-12 08:31:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 171519634 (Comments: 2) | Wolfgang Holtz (Discussed changesets: 40) | Das ist ja schon eine Weile her. An die Bearbeitung direkt habe ich keine Erinnerung. Ich war Mal zwischen Zweibrücken Str. und .... Röhrendamm, wahrscheinlich habe ich dort eine entsprechende Beschilderung gesehen. commented 2026-10-12 08:30:45 UTC by Wolfgang Holtz ♦24 |
| 190271929 (Comments: 2) | Filip009 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Znova otravný iDeditor používa ako "Chodba v budove" highway=corridor, preto som použil toto. Ten múrik tam vyzeral ako, že sa na ňom dá sedieť. A predpokladám, že pri podujatiach práve... commented 2026-10-12 08:27:07 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,131 |
| 190342559 (Comments: 1) | Henrik Friis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for mapping. You tagged a vaque area as a settlement Task 207 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567296440/history#map=19/1.657411/29.999852 On the current imagery you can see 1 object which can be a building. Others are not to be rec... commented 2026-10-12 08:24:09 UTC by Frans S ♦11,053 |
| 190385460 (Comments: 6) | Fopper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Het Lauwerscollege heb ik op het terrein gezet. CTRL F5 voor het effect. commented 2026-10-12 08:21:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190360715 (Comments: 2) | Taktaal (Discussed changesets: 43) | Ich habe die beiden Nodes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190386333 zusammengeführt. commented 2026-10-12 08:16:03 UTC by habi ♦2,283 |
| 190386073 (Comments: 1) | Fopper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wellicht heb je hier iets aan. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.25806,6.306056,18/?datastrip=20260925_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO Ik had het Lauwerscollege weer teruggezet, maar dat heb je inmiddels weer verwijderd. commented 2026-10-12 08:15:31 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 189549900 (Comments: 7) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 12) | Could you elaborate how it helps? I'd like it to help me as well. With your approach you can't visually see if it's a makeshift cycleway or a safe one on the map. You can't see that there are soft bollards. In my approach t... commented 2026-10-12 08:05:51 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦520 |
| 190339170 (Comments: 8) | Undercovernutzer (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2026-10-12 08:02:49 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190299513 (Comments: 1) | Angel_Nyarko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Angel_Nyarko, Thank you for mapping, unfortunately this road does not exist. Please use Esri World Imagery since Bing Imagery is very out-of-date here as the time of your mapping. Here is a getting started guide for iD editor https://le... commented 2026-10-12 07:56:37 UTC by Enock4seth ♦693 |
| 190321431 (Comments: 1) | Winston Smith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, wie ist die Strasse denn beschildert? "access" Tags sind eher ungewöhnlich und werden nur in Ausnahmefällen verwendet. Man nimmt bei den üblichen 250er Schildern mit Landwirtschaft eher "vehicle=agricultu... commented 2026-10-12 07:50:59 UTC by disc24 ♦42 |
| 190344307 (Comments: 1) | atomic73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, bravo pour vos premières contributions ! Par contre, merci de mettre des descriptions plus complètes de vos modifications ;:) Je vous conseille de faire des groupes de modifications plus ciblées, tout en uploadant ... commented 2026-10-12 07:37:39 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 190382740 (Comments: 3) | Hansemans (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=190382740 commented 2026-10-12 07:29:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190345184 (Comments: 1) | Kunyck89 (Discussed changesets: 2) | parfait, je ne vois pas de correction à faire, bravo pour cette amélioration de la carte ! commented 2026-10-12 07:26:26 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 190345398 (Comments: 1) | Kunyck89 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ajout du tag cuisine=crepe sinon tout le reste est bon, bravo pour cette contribution ! commented 2026-10-12 07:25:09 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 118920743 (Comments: 1) | AntReid (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9606250875 - traffic calming? commented 2026-10-12 07:19:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 189177301 (Comments: 2) | Francesco Amicucci (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for pointing it out! I will change all I added so far in the next days, thank you again! commented 2026-10-12 07:18:52 UTC by Francesco Amicucci ♦1 |
| 190383254 (Comments: 1) | GrabPH_abelardopaunejr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, please stop repeatedly adding the 'No straight on' relation at this intersection. Based on a recent on-site survey, this intersection is actually open. Continuing to delete/add "No straight on" relation to this area this wi... commented 2026-10-12 07:12:54 UTC by 23634161 ♦6 |
| 154485445 (Comments: 2) | Josepvc (Discussed changesets: 33) | removed it from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12076924300/history commented 2026-10-12 07:08:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
 | 190314527 (Comments: 1) | Македонија (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21426 commented 2026-10-12 06:56:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190133951 (Comments: 1) | DADADADADADADADADAD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21425 commented 2026-10-12 06:54:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190327439 (Comments: 1) | Rob2981 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190382808 commented 2026-10-12 06:50:46 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
| 190185444 (Comments: 2) | runeml (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hei. poenger er at hurtigruten ikke kan bebyttes til å beregne rute og dermed pris for taxitur siden taxien ikke kjører, men blir fraktet. Taxien kan fortsatt ta hurtigruten da den er en bil. commented 2026-10-12 06:46:46 UTC by runeml ♦2 |
| 190357237 (Comments: 1) | keke656565 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, bravo pour vos premières contributions ! J'ai corrigé le format du numéro en +33, veillez à bien les noter en format international lorsque vous les cartographier. commented 2026-10-12 06:46:20 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 190234602 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 526) | Bonjour, Merci de votre alerte. Nous avons supprimé le doublon crée par erreur Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2026-10-12 06:41:48 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦346 |
| 190187371 (Comments: 1) | Stadtbus_Kempten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Warum nicht highway=construction? Die Brücke bleibt ja nicht nur gesperrt sondern wird komplett abgerissen und neu gebaut. Damit würde die Brücke auch im Renderer als Baustelle angezeigt werden, anstatt nur nicht geroutet zu werden... commented 2026-10-12 06:40:26 UTC by Alex_mappt ♦4 |
| 190358445 (Comments: 1) | La Bourgonniere (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour, bravo pour votre première contribution, j'ai ajouté le tag tourism=chalet pour bien le marqué comme un gite. commented 2026-10-12 06:40:01 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 67857757 (Comments: 2) | nikusha (Discussed changesets: 22) | No, it's nickname of the difficult offroading road. commented 2026-10-12 06:37:30 UTC by nikusha ♦12 |
| 167590976 (Comments: 1) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 45) | Ce n'est pas un batiment, juste une terrasse de 30cm de haut commented 2026-10-12 06:35:48 UTC by Moosh ♦1 |
| 190365293 (Comments: 1) | harmonie&pattes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, J'ai corrigé l'attribut de la clinique de building=retail à amenity=veterinary https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=veterinary Bravo pour cette première modification ! commented 2026-10-12 06:31:53 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 169858137 (Comments: 3) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 59) | To rozumiem, ale droga w ogóle tak nie wygląda, np: okolica https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543473258 commented 2026-10-12 06:27:13 UTC by VA00 ♦664 |
| 190327143 (Comments: 1) | Rob2981 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190380834 commented 2026-10-12 06:00:33 UTC by ajmat ♦618 |
 | 190032702 (Comments: 3) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello DMP-SV, Thank you for your comment and the reference materials. The u-turn segments seem to meet highway-link criteria defined on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link. At the time of my edit, the main segment was tagged as mo... commented 2026-10-12 05:16:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,177 |
 | 190375863 (Comments: 1) | Ketzystudy (Discussed changesets: 1) | hola, buenos días y gracias por las contribuciones! es que te estás olvidando la etiqueta "building=yes"! commented 2026-10-12 05:09:17 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,911 |
| 190281830 (Comments: 1) | kelijah_18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi kelijah_18, Welcome to Openstreetmap, and Congratulations for your first Edit ! I corrected 2 small problems with your edit. 1. You accidentally dragged a node/point from Osmena Boulevard to your new footway. I don't know how this ha... commented 2026-10-12 04:56:24 UTC by Totor ♦91 |
| 188901681 (Comments: 5) | BER319 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ansonsten kannst du bitte gerne auch wieder Path nehmen. commented 2026-10-12 04:42:52 UTC by BER319 ♦117 |
| 190342340 (Comments: 2) | BissetWV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Glad you used "look like". Because you are dead wrong. I am busy with something that will benefit both the residents of Marloth Park and the tourist that visit both Marloth and the Kruger. Have a nice Monday. commented 2026-10-12 04:40:32 UTC by BissetWV ♦1 |
| 190194266 (Comments: 4) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello bxl-forever, Thank you for reaching out and explaining the local context here. I tried to review the referenced project website, but I could not access it at the time. Based on the user feedback we received and the available GPS traces, the ... commented 2026-10-12 04:34:54 UTC by 007Transformer ♦71 |
| 190378104 (Comments: 1) | PNkVuu (Discussed changesets: 1) | when an object already exists please do not add duplicates and instead edit the existing feature. Also Please use the correct phone number format in the future, in the US it is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN where N is a number between 0 and 9. Happy mapping... commented 2026-10-12 04:34:12 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 188859769 (Comments: 1) | lephan (Discussed changesets: 11) | way/1558064172 I couldn't see any physical separation with way/1139190655, so I've converted them into a single way with segregated=yes If there's commented 2026-10-12 04:00:02 UTC by aharvey ♦2,014 |
| 161915957 (Comments: 1) | lephan (Discussed changesets: 11) | I see on way/1087857538 you've removed footway=sidewalk, which we should still have either footway=sidewalk or cycleway=sidewalk since this is a footpath alongside a road. What's your basis for making it highway=cycleway, walking the... commented 2026-10-12 03:50:16 UTC by aharvey ♦2,014 |
| 190377584 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 46) | if (in the main editor (the one that pops up when you click "Edit" on this website)) you go to "Background Settings" (shortcut "B") go down the list of "Backgrounds" at the bottom there is a "Custom",... commented 2026-10-12 03:45:20 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 190339306 (Comments: 1) | M_Kucha (Discussed changesets: 96) | Inkorrektes building=house wieder entfernt bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509887330/ in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190377319 commented 2026-10-12 03:10:20 UTC by Bienson ♦668 |
| 190351677 (Comments: 1) | WWSS (Discussed changesets: 30) | 一台一個點位 看台北好玩網站仍有這一台飲水機 https://gismobile.water.gov.taipei/WaterMap_drink/map/map.aspx --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190351677 |
| 190339877 (Comments: 1) | M_Kucha (Discussed changesets: 96) | Nicht existente Eingänge an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005115143 wieder gelöscht und die Adressen korrekt eingetragen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190376594 commented 2026-10-12 02:33:47 UTC by Bienson ♦668 |
| 190340926 (Comments: 1) | M_Kucha (Discussed changesets: 96) | Korrekte Umrisse von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53532907/ wiederhergestellt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190376358 commented 2026-10-12 02:15:17 UTC by Bienson ♦668 |
| 190341368 (Comments: 1) | M_Kucha (Discussed changesets: 96) | Korrekte Umrisse von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53798000/ wiederhergestellt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190376276 commented 2026-10-12 02:10:24 UTC by Bienson ♦668 |
| 190339272 (Comments: 1) | M_Kucha (Discussed changesets: 96) | Adresse korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190376158 commented 2026-10-12 02:03:21 UTC by Bienson ♦668 |
| 190374575 (Comments: 1) | goliath_jr (Discussed changesets: 1) | EDIT: This changeset was for website, not opening_hours commented 2026-10-12 01:37:10 UTC by goliath_jr ♦1 |
| 188977618 (Comments: 3) | ks1v (Discussed changesets: 42) | о, спасибо! commented 2026-10-12 01:32:08 UTC by ks1v ♦26 |
| 190226274 (Comments: 1) | ljksaliad20972 (Discussed changesets: 2) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21424 commented 2026-10-12 01:05:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 189891544 (Comments: 4) | Zhen Sun (Discussed changesets: 52) | A mode-specific key like :hgv would only be applied if we do know for certain there is a separate value for it. It is otherwise presumed to be the same as the base key. A value such as this can only truly be confirmed by on-the-ground in-person surve... commented 2026-10-12 00:59:22 UTC by Moonfire ♦9 |
| 189610743 (Comments: 2) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hi, what exactly is not correct? I tried my best ;-; commented 2026-10-12 00:46:35 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦77 |
| 190157103 (Comments: 1) | tms13 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hi, C-roads should use highway_authority_ref rather than ref as this is typically an unsigned designation commented 2026-10-12 00:26:41 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 190338219 (Comments: 1) | ilya37529 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. This looks very much like a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10263081727 which had been added 4 years ago. Also, the "name" you added should not be used as the official name of this ticket shop. Use the d... commented 2026-10-12 00:23:16 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 190336100 (Comments: 1) | V1CT0R_GE0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-10-12 00:22:09 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,786 |
| 189388787 (Comments: 1) | Madx321XLR (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have removed this - there is already a football pitch mapped here commented 2026-10-12 00:20:49 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 190278094 (Comments: 6) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 101) | Thanks for demonstrating this. I was under the impression that the editor would reject all merges when conflicting tags or relations were present, especially given the various warnings and errors it generates. I’ve encountered errors such as &l... commented 2026-10-12 00:17:44 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦198 |
| 190266257 (Comments: 1) | Kalle504 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1566877349 ist ein Reitplatz und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1566877350 ist ein Roundpen. Ich habe die Flächen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190374003 dementsprechend umgetaggt. Vgl. ht... commented 2026-10-11 23:56:37 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦918 |
| 163310536 (Comments: 1) | bertboy (Discussed changesets: 10) | Wrong! Devlins Creek (the waterway) ends where it contacts the Lane Cove Rv. The track also ends there too - see the DCS Base Map for the correct names. commented 2026-10-11 23:47:32 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,799 |
| 190180376 (Comments: 3) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 28) | Glad I could help! Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! commented 2026-10-11 23:44:02 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦83 |
| 190373139 (Comments: 1) | Diego Volpe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios: - Corregí el nombre del hotel y quité la marca. Si fuera una cadena de hoteles se podría haber usado la combinación. - Revertí la ubi... commented 2026-10-11 23:42:56 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦191 |
| 181909201 (Comments: 4) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 101) | Where street signs say one thing and "official" records say another, street signs win. Official records can be wrong. commented 2026-10-11 23:35:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,893 |
| 189417548 (Comments: 2) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | I retagged them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190373620 commented 2026-10-11 23:30:58 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦918 |
| 190018787 (Comments: 1) | M_9999 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, are you still working to complete the residential areas. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.93226&lat=-28.65453&zoom=14 commented 2026-10-11 23:12:17 UTC by nevw ♦2,367 |
| 190372827 (Comments: 1) | nomadTB (Discussed changesets: 1) | I drove out to this location and looked at the street sign. It says "Brickhouse Dr". I saw no indication the entryway to Brickhouse Commons has a separate name. I asked the staff at the cafe about their use of "Brickhouse Road... commented 2026-10-11 22:53:18 UTC by nomadTB ♦1 |
| 190069300 (Comments: 4) | oliviar_grab (Discussed changesets: 9) | thanks ! especially as you're using JOSM, it's super fast to check for warning commented 2026-10-11 22:21:21 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦71 |
| 180479317 (Comments: 4) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 173) | Verstehe die Intention mit dem Wenden, aber gibt es keine Möglichkeit, das zu lösen, ohne eine access-Beschränkung dazuzudichten? Denn die beginnt ja auch erst ab dem Schild. Sonst hätte man ja auch genauso gut die Fußgä... commented 2026-10-11 22:19:22 UTC by N9713 ♦18 |
| 184158548 (Comments: 2) | Swinging Cat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Message received and understood. Thank you. commented 2026-10-11 22:13:18 UTC by Swinging Cat ♦5 |
| 185681599 (Comments: 2) | Swinging Cat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Understood, I've done a number of walks in the north of the area. I shall remember in future, noting just a little I'm learning my way around this website. commented 2026-10-11 22:12:20 UTC by Swinging Cat ♦5 |
| 127383598 (Comments: 2) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 137) | Url would be more useful, I mean this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103019190 Nearby crossing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883789645 commented 2026-10-11 22:11:40 UTC by Marek Zahradnik ♦7 |
| 190368287 (Comments: 2) | splisp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sicuramente! Appena posso lo aggiorno, grazie commented 2026-10-11 22:11:27 UTC by splisp ♦2 |
| 181072744 (Comments: 2) | Swinging Cat (Discussed changesets: 5) | It's the first I've heard of them being private, noting I've used them without issues and have seen others use them frequently (joggers, dog walkers). There are no signs saying private land or notifications elsewhere of this. Howev... commented 2026-10-11 22:10:20 UTC by Swinging Cat ♦5 |
| 190201992 (Comments: 1) | darosi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the Edit, this looks good. I see that you added access=private which is the best way to indicate residents only parking. Is the same true of the other nearby block? commented 2026-10-11 22:06:29 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦393 |
| 190271311 (Comments: 3) | g234arcia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your comment! Brownfield is more accurate, it is just a vague open space with no specific use yet. commented 2026-10-11 22:04:57 UTC by g234arcia ♦1 |
| 190215091 (Comments: 1) | lotym1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | здравствуйте, неактивное - значит там больше не хоронят, или следов кладбища тоже нет? название нигде не нахожу commented 2026-10-11 21:56:43 UTC by 4004 ♦1,960 |
| 71963481 (Comments: 1) | سامي ايت علي ولحسن (Discussed changesets: 5) | Why did you modify all the street name to have name == name:ar ? Your broke the local rules which you can read in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#Names commented 2026-10-11 21:47:28 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦71 |
| 190034893 (Comments: 1) | Susan Guest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for doing this, it looks to me like you managed to get everything done. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. commented 2026-10-11 21:45:15 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦393 |
| X | 189696362 (Comments: 2) | Vi2727 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ciao, scusa! Ho controllato e sembra che abbia riattivato la fermata per errore. commented 2026-10-11 21:43:07 UTC by Vi2727 ♦29 |
| 190258188 (Comments: 2) | coleman (Discussed changesets: 2) | I didn’t add those tags, already there. I was only editing geometry and might’ve left some there without removing them. No idea how someone created those. commented 2026-10-11 21:23:08 UTC by coleman ♦1 |
| 179219624 (Comments: 2) | rebeccanara (Discussed changesets: 2) | still not there on the latest imagery so deleted. commented 2026-10-11 21:22:55 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
| 190267069 (Comments: 2) | aleksander25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Usunąłem ten obiekt, w ogóle obiekty dodane przez Aleksandra są wadliwe i wyglądają na dodawane losowo commented 2026-10-11 21:22:22 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190326604 (Comments: 1) | SuperLottoFlock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You've not actually removed the camera node in this changeset, only one of the tags. Looking at the edit history it seems it existed before, according to a user adding them from a California public information request. You may w... commented 2026-10-11 21:21:47 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦69 |
| 190367721 (Comments: 1) | aleksander25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-11 21:19:08 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190367807 (Comments: 1) | aleksander25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Proszę o powstrzymanie się od dodawania zbędnych i nieistniejących obiektów do mapy commented 2026-10-11 21:16:08 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190369115 (Comments: 2) | aleksander25 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-11 21:13:27 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190362258 (Comments: 2) | Apfelstrudl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry for that commented 2026-10-11 21:10:25 UTC by Apfelstrudl ♦1 |
| 190074677 (Comments: 1) | tintou (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, l'unification n'est pas faite dans le bon sens. La marque Noctilien n'est plus exploitée et IDFM parle uniquement de bus de nuit. commented 2026-10-11 21:03:19 UTC by blm07 ♦7 |
| 190245089 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 341) | Brak odpowiedzi. Za tydzień robię reverta twoich zmian w tej okolicy commented 2026-10-11 20:58:59 UTC by db-ak ♦89 |
| 190366727 (Comments: 1) | Infrastrukturist (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Infrastrukturänderung bzw. Mibomboclat, willkommen bei OSM. Der Anbieter von anglermap.de verweist in seinem Inpressum auf das deutsche Urheberrecht. Jede Art der Verwertung bedarf seiner schriftlichen Zustimmung. Ist diese vorhande... commented 2026-10-11 20:57:50 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,469 |
| 190369554 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 194) | Моля някой да види има ли проблеми след тази редакция(покрай релации). commented 2026-10-11 20:56:17 UTC by Fraxi ♦523 |
| 177395115 (Comments: 2) | Amphibulus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Et si c'est un collecteur d'eau usées ne devrait-il pas avoir substance=sewage + location=underground et un layer < 0 ? commented 2026-10-11 20:42:31 UTC by fgouget ♦126 |
| 190333314 (Comments: 1) | MichaelCollinson (Discussed changesets: 97) | Hej! Vi brukar inte sätta source tagg för de flesta objekt sen ganska länge sen, speciellt inte landuse och vägar med satellitbilder. Information i changeset funkar mycket bättre. Är det Potlatch som fortfarande ... commented 2026-10-11 20:40:18 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦69 |
| 186798755 (Comments: 4) | c674a (Discussed changesets: 6) | If way/62286697 was initially mapped wrongfully in your opinion, then feel free to change back the area as you illustrated. commented 2026-10-11 20:24:11 UTC by c674a ♦10 |
| 190366566 (Comments: 1) | maxell32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Thanks for adding an artwork but please observe that this edit was ambiguous. Because OSM data is two-dimensional, locating an object here means that the artwork is *inside* the building. I found the object, which is not inside t... commented 2026-10-11 20:02:34 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 190366799 (Comments: 2) | maxell32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I appreciate it commented 2026-10-11 20:01:57 UTC by maxell32 ♦1 |
| 190270977 (Comments: 2) | Younes_Saadatikian (Discussed changesets: 10) | متاسفانه بنده مجبور به گزارش حساب شما شدم، چون بی دلیل و کاملا غیرموجه تگ جاده ها و شهر ها رو اشتباه تغییر میدهید و جواب به کامنت هم ندادید.... commented 2026-10-11 19:51:04 UTC by elsy1 ♦216 |
| 189599467 (Comments: 2) | MIĘDZYRZEC PODLASKI GOATS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Eh. Przepraszam z tymi blednymi uwagami dotyczacymi CPR. Pomylilem strone "bylo" z "jest". Ty naprawiles CPR-ki, a nie je popsules. Dzieki commented 2026-10-11 19:46:19 UTC by MaciekMma ♦79 |
| 173700877 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 658) | Hello! It looks like some? of the reversions only removed tags or parts of objects, e.g. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363886105/history I'll let you remove it in case there's more left over as well. commented 2026-10-11 19:44:30 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦69 |
| 190035203 (Comments: 1) | runeml (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hei, og velkommen til Openstreetmap! Du har funnet den rette måten å kartlegge at det er gjennomkjøring forbudt på denne strekningen, som er å sette motor_vehicle=destination / motorkjøretøy=destination. J... commented 2026-10-11 19:43:12 UTC by Noen ♦319 |
| 189360880 (Comments: 3) | Savo25656 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Iskreno ne znam sta treba tu da bude probam se raspitati al ima ogradu koja je vise na standardno kućna. A plac je malen za neku stambenu zgradu commented 2026-10-11 19:43:12 UTC by nev123 ♦1 |
| 189501377 (Comments: 1) | MIĘDZYRZEC PODLASKI GOATS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Chciale mzwrocic uwage nazjazdyz DK19, ale widze ze inni uzytkownicy walsnie wycofali wszystkie Twojezmiany zwiazane z DK19 ktore wprowadziles w tym changesecie commented 2026-10-11 19:39:28 UTC by MaciekMma ♦79 |
| 189504216 (Comments: 1) | MIĘDZYRZEC PODLASKI GOATS (Discussed changesets: 5) | Czesc, czemu usunales DDR-kez tego CPR-a? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384767009 od miasta w strone rzeki? A od rzeki dalej an zachod w strone DK19 zostawiles... bez zmian? commented 2026-10-11 19:31:59 UTC by MaciekMma ♦79 |
| 151963990 (Comments: 1) | d3mol3k (Discussed changesets: 119) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11940625485/history o co chodzi z tym obiektem? commented 2026-10-11 19:25:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190349953 (Comments: 2) | sffra (Discussed changesets: 2) | name: Gärten commented 2026-10-11 19:22:50 UTC by sffra ♦2 |
| 175402192 (Comments: 1) | nurdafur (Discussed changesets: 112) | Note for future mappers: I was a bit surprised with the many 'horse=designated' tags on what I'd expect to be cycleways; but the traffic signs indeed indicate a horse... commented 2026-10-11 19:22:33 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦474 |
| 190362815 (Comments: 2) | Maarten00000000001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb het aangepast. commented 2026-10-11 19:10:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190361704 (Comments: 5) | Svenboyy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ik heb moped en mofa als =yes teruggezet. Zou even een terugmelding doen naar die appbouwer. Groet, eggie commented 2026-10-11 19:05:56 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190364542 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 146) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 190356322. commented 2026-10-11 18:28:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190356322 (Comments: 1) | Dima Rocks (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190364542 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-10-11 18:28:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190362157 (Comments: 1) | d44taq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Le camping est sur 3 niveaux. L'accès au premier et deuxième niveau est facile. Je n'ai pas réussi à atteindre le 3eme niveau avec un Fiat Ducato en raison de l'herbe qui rend chemin glissant. Endro... commented 2026-10-11 18:27:32 UTC by d44taq ♦1 |
| 183079998 (Comments: 2) | Yaa bby (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Yaa bby, can you please update these features? commented 2026-10-11 18:23:56 UTC by Enock4seth ♦693 |
| 190363785 (Comments: 1) | andilocke (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry, falsch Beschreibung zum Änderungssatz. Richtig wäre: Neueröffnung Schlüsseldienst. commented 2026-10-11 18:18:58 UTC by andilocke ♦12 |
| 189984446 (Comments: 7) | dnarmit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, bei Fragen bitte melden. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-11 18:18:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190337739 (Comments: 1) | sjorford (Discussed changesets: 15) | Why have you deleted the cycleways? Have they been physically removed? commented 2026-10-11 18:18:28 UTC by Pete Owens ♦91 |
| 190190912 (Comments: 1) | julian_neuhierl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen: - Am Beispiel von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14264037391: Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerw... commented 2026-10-11 18:16:18 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190359928 (Comments: 4) | RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek (Discussed changesets: 10) | De niet meer bestaande track heb ik verwijderd. De rest aangesloten op de highway=service. Staat op acecss=private. Evt emergency =yes toevoegen als dat van toepassing zou zijn. Gr eggie commented 2026-10-11 18:13:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190230389 (Comments: 1) | Younes_Saadatikian (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bahrain is not a city of Iran. why does your changeset include naming it "Bahrain City, Iran"? commented 2026-10-11 18:09:28 UTC by Equalizer379 ♦4 |
| 190362225 (Comments: 3) | rempshaener (Discussed changesets: 59) | Nee, das muss ich ausführlicher erklären: Weil auf Grund der Gesamtumstände erkennbar ist, dass weder der Eingang genutzt werden soll, noch größere Postlieferungen dort zugestellt werden sollen und stattdessen das weiter s&u... commented 2026-10-11 18:03:31 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190211788 (Comments: 1) | Maverick12 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Macht es Sinn die Öffnungszeiten wie bei node/14265314579 auf die Sekunde genau anzugeben? commented 2026-10-11 18:03:06 UTC by hlfan ♦123 |
| 188576868 (Comments: 6) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 176) | Otwarte https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190363268 commented 2026-10-11 18:02:56 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,500 |
| 189469026 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Leech (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, on a couple of these you added a single house number to a terrace of multiple houses, I have now split the buildings up into their individual houses, but therefore had to remove the number, as it can't have been right and I didn't know ... commented 2026-10-11 17:56:34 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦498 |
| 190311867 (Comments: 2) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 14) | @Mapiate no commented 2026-10-11 17:54:57 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦17 |
| 190348365 (Comments: 1) | Anonimus6789 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#Link_geometry https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:placement https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian rysowanie takich ekierek aż do końca linii ciąg... commented 2026-10-11 17:51:16 UTC by dzamper ♦289 |
| 189620381 (Comments: 1) | Binky Bunny (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thanks for adding these, I've split them into individual houses now, but I also noticed that some weren't quite square. There's a button for that, or the q shortcut, which is often useful for houses commented 2026-10-11 17:48:43 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦498 |
| 190362109 (Comments: 1) | skohel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please take a look at way 1567137515. You've mapped over yourself without cleaning up previous works. Plus, you've left several nodes orphaned (e.g. node 14270096468). Please clean this up because it triggers a bunch of Q/A alarms fo... commented 2026-10-11 17:45:15 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
| 190361340 (Comments: 1) | Yorina93 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback... Maar die viervoeters rennen vast niet over dat fietspad. Terrein heb ik aangepast MVG, Eggie Namens de OS... commented 2026-10-11 17:37:53 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190354023 (Comments: 2) | rempshaener (Discussed changesets: 59) | stimmt commented 2026-10-11 17:37:50 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190345729 (Comments: 2) | eastender (Discussed changesets: 36) | Sorry, please ignore me! I've just seen the updated info here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:post_box:type . This was new to me, sorry! :-D commented 2026-10-11 17:31:07 UTC by IpswichEdits ♦46 |
| 190357535 (Comments: 1) | Arielyahel13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | בבקשה להימנע מנקודות פרטיות. נמחק. commented 2026-10-11 17:18:42 UTC by hatul ♦540 |
| 187807413 (Comments: 1) | Saamat (Discussed changesets: 6) | By drawing this building as a set of discrete parts then combining them as a relation, it appears on maps such as CoMaps as five separate entries. That is confusing to navigation. It would be better to redraw this building as a single building, not a... commented 2026-10-11 17:08:49 UTC by apm-wa ♦263 |
| 172168094 (Comments: 1) | M Schillinger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Pfad ist auch im gelöschten Abschnitt einwandfrei zu sehen und sehr deutlich in den Hang gegraben. Das Löschen existierender Wege wird in OSM als Vandalismus betrachtet! (Für verfallene Wege gibt es Lifecycle-Präfixe wie... commented 2026-10-11 17:06:05 UTC by martinst ♦422 |
| 190115394 (Comments: 2) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 261) | Duplikowało by się między lokalami - w rejestrze są przedsiębiorcy, a niektórzy mają i po kilkaset punktów. Dlatego nie myślałem o tym żeby wpisywać po prostu w ref=* Za to później zastanowiłem się, czy to nie ... commented 2026-10-11 17:03:41 UTC by kubahahaha ♦535 |
| 184119757 (Comments: 2) | Swinging Cat (Discussed changesets: 5) | I'll go in and remove the other labels when I get a few minutes. I'm afraid it was a chess-related joke with friends that I admit should had been removed ages ago. Simply put, we forgot about it. commented 2026-10-11 16:54:48 UTC by Swinging Cat ♦5 |
| 190357060 (Comments: 3) | JakeHBRS (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2026-10-11 16:48:08 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190172867 (Comments: 2) | ChloeEdmondson (Discussed changesets: 7) | sorry about that commented 2026-10-11 16:43:50 UTC by ChloeEdmondson ♦7 |
| 190173372 (Comments: 2) | ChloeEdmondson (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi thank you will note that for future commented 2026-10-11 16:43:29 UTC by ChloeEdmondson ♦7 |
| 190348206 (Comments: 1) | Hemoski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fiction and unnecessary nodes are removed. commented 2026-10-11 16:42:53 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,398 |
| X | 178047372 (Comments: 2) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 69) | Na wenn dann sicher nicht nur den route_master. Und wenn nicht nur EuroCitys diese Verbindung fahren,wovon ich ausgehe, gehört das in separate PTv2-Relationen. commented 2026-10-11 16:42:19 UTC by hlfan ♦123 |
| 190359644 (Comments: 2) | Hadis Neslanović (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nalazi se na putu izmedju Busovačke planine i Suhe Vode. commented 2026-10-11 16:40:30 UTC by Hadis Neslanović ♦1 |
| 190241935 (Comments: 1) | Joedg (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1566740393 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines sh... commented 2026-10-11 16:30:08 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
| 190314705 (Comments: 1) | Edgr9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Guten Abend, ...das war aller äußerst ungünstig, einsch zu löschen. Das Problem ist, daß das Gebäude weiterhin im Luftbild sichbar ist. Es können Dritte kommen, die das nicht gleich beachten und sowas wieder e... commented 2026-10-11 16:28:21 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,201 |
| 152817481 (Comments: 1) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 160) | I only just noticed this, thank you for correcting my mistake Robert. commented 2026-10-11 16:28:02 UTC by UKChris ♦51 |
| 189987336 (Comments: 1) | FlDeech (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, angesichts der Tatsache, dass hier das Feld "ref" immer mal wieder "wechselt": In dieses Feld kommt ausschließlich die Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewiesen ist. Viele Grü&szl... commented 2026-10-11 16:23:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 189988381 (Comments: 1) | FlDeech (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, folgende Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen an Hydranten: - Hydranten haben keine Namen. Bitte entferne diese. - Hydranten haben keine Adressen oder Adressfragmente. Unter Umständen wird schon einmal über das object:*-Schem... commented 2026-10-11 16:21:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 181376085 (Comments: 2) | jmittelhammer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ich habe deine Änderung in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190358059 rückgängig gemacht. LG Jbah commented 2026-10-11 16:07:47 UTC by Jbah ♦59 |
| 190358059 (Comments: 1) | Jbah (Discussed changesets: 17) | Revert of 181376085 and subsequent ("wrong") edits. commented 2026-10-11 16:07:06 UTC by Jbah ♦59 |
| 190203072 (Comments: 1) | osm_poi_matchmaker (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi. Az operator:addr címke nem lesz jó, cégjegyzékben és nyugtán is "2225 Üllő, Sóderes köz 6." szerepel. És ha már ott vagyunk, mehetne egy ref:HU:company=13-09-0880... commented 2026-10-11 16:04:00 UTC by qstep ♦282 |
| 190350298 (Comments: 2) | Kim Bach (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tak for hjælpen :-) commented 2026-10-11 16:01:25 UTC by Kim Bach ♦2 |
| 190357511 (Comments: 1) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | source falsch, war: Luftbild und basemap commented 2026-10-11 15:56:29 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦23 |
| 190333164 (Comments: 3) | Hubert12345 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Wycofuję i zgłaszam do DWG. commented 2026-10-11 15:56:14 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,011 |
| 190357141 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 117) | also the intersections of Mary Brickell Road and Southwest 25th Road/ the I 95 exit ramp, Southwest 25th Road and the I 95 entrance ramp, all based on the latest imagery due to somewhat recent construction in the area. commented 2026-10-11 15:53:02 UTC by Udarian ♦976 |
 | 190348101 (Comments: 7) | aghazarian (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK. Podría estar de varias formas, pero hay que coordinarlo en una sola, para que este coherente o consistente y pueda ser bien usado por los desarrolladores de las apps en primera instancia, y aprovechado por los usuarios finales de las apps ... commented 2026-10-11 15:52:53 UTC by muralito ♦2,183 |
| 190355546 (Comments: 1) | hschack79 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin :) ich hätte drei kleine Anmerkungen: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145571308 warum hast du hier die Geometrie geändert? Luftbild und NRW-Kataster geben das nicht her. - "Diverse Änderungen" i... commented 2026-10-11 15:49:42 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190308600 (Comments: 6) | Bernd Ritter (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh Mann, nochmals vielen Dank - ich werde mich bessern - learning by doing.... Wünsche Dir ne tolle Woche! commented 2026-10-11 15:45:20 UTC by Bernd Ritter ♦3 |
| 190288933 (Comments: 1) | cpeuvrel (Discussed changesets: 3) | @cpeuvrel See changeset/190304380 about local tagging convention commented 2026-10-11 15:42:17 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦69 |
| 179059351 (Comments: 3) | cwodwrth (Discussed changesets: 2) | woops, wrong person, but still relevant commented 2026-10-11 15:41:24 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦69 |
| 190353265 (Comments: 1) | m2527363 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv az OSM-en! Ha lehetséges, kérlek mindig írj leírást és forrást a módosításaidhoz, ez segít másoknak a minőségellenőrzésben: https://wiki.open... commented 2026-10-11 15:41:23 UTC by qstep ♦282 |
| 188427591 (Comments: 3) | JasonEHarris (Discussed changesets: 1) | They aren't always, but as this one was particularly long, and it's a very busy road, I felt it was reasonable to add the one-way aspect for map users. commented 2026-10-11 15:40:53 UTC by UKChris ♦51 |
| 190304380 (Comments: 3) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 112) | Looking at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/roads-with-two-names-on-different-sides/131230/21 it seems the US is using a different standard to everyone else. But if there's local consensus on it, then it should be that way. There... commented 2026-10-11 15:36:52 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦69 |
| 190341364 (Comments: 2) | k1wi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Perdón, quería decir que "Según lo que se acordó en el foro de la comunidad española (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/simplificacion-del-etiquetado-de-nombres-multilingues-en-euskadi-y-nafarroa/137377/45)... commented 2026-10-11 15:35:06 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,889 |
| 190270452 (Comments: 3) | IpswichEdits (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Thank you for replacing it with the appropriate tag. I've also added the address details and some social media accounts, so the information is now complete. commented 2026-10-11 15:23:51 UTC by Comino ♦420 |
| 190217069 (Comments: 1) | berrymandj (Discussed changesets: 3) | When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways... commented 2026-10-11 15:21:30 UTC by b-jazz ♦970 |
| 189780157 (Comments: 1) | MrMappes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was ist mit der Stopposition Ulmenstraße ? Warum was:public_transport Wenn es keine Haltestelle mehr ist, gehört sie auch aus den Buslinien gelöscht. commented 2026-10-11 15:12:39 UTC by bernward1 ♦54 |
| 190353328 (Comments: 1) | sjssbujhhuu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag sjss, Wwellicht heb je je afgevraagd waarom al die trottoirs niet zijn gemapt. Dat is niet fout, want er is geen consensus. Gebruikelijk is om trottoirs op te namen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk = right left of b... commented 2026-10-11 15:12:01 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190236112 (Comments: 1) | Wahyul_Kontur (Discussed changesets: 8) | *delete buildings commented 2026-10-11 15:05:07 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190348420 (Comments: 2) | jboerg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Grüß dich, hab mich da ein bisschen daran orientiert, wie es an anderen Standorten gemacht wurde - da wurde es oftmals direkt im name= hinterlegt (da kommt im Namen auch häufiger mal S-Bahn Waschanlage o.ä. vor). Kann man sich... commented 2026-10-11 15:03:31 UTC by jboerg ♦2 |
 | 190243170 (Comments: 1) | Ahmed_Nagi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Update height for 3d commented 2026-10-11 14:59:28 UTC by Ahmed_Nagi ♦1 |
| 190215048 (Comments: 3) | Codex (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2026-10-11 14:59:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 188957668 (Comments: 3) | Rabo2024 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Von Zum Sietels 7 weiß ich, dass ein bekannter dafür eine Baugenehmigung hat und dementsprechend dort zu bauen plant, womit eine Adresse in OSM vermutlich nützlich/sinnvoll ist. Bei 5 gibt es einen Bretterzaun ums Grundstück. ... commented 2026-10-11 14:56:35 UTC by Rabo2024 ♦3 |
| 190340783 (Comments: 1) | cale design (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :) schön, dass du dich selbst um die Details deines Ladens kümmerst. Ich hoffe, der Markt hat für Kundschaft gesorgt :) Bei Fragen rund um OSM immer raus damit Grüße... commented 2026-10-11 14:54:39 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190342472 (Comments: 1) | cornim (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi again :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109853282 this looks very much like a highway=track in aerials. Are you sure with what you did? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2026-10-11 14:51:30 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190342518 (Comments: 1) | cornim (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi you turned a barrier=fence into a highway=track. This doesn't work so maybe take a look again and fix it :) cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190342518... commented 2026-10-11 14:49:58 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
 | 190343079 (Comments: 1) | Glovo Rider (Discussed changesets: 3) | я живу на этом районе, элебаева сама по себе кривая commented 2026-10-11 14:48:02 UTC by kanyazavr ♦1 |
| 190337893 (Comments: 1) | Andi purnomo 123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | tidak perlu menambahkan Kota Tuo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567272226. Di situ sudah ada Kota Tuo commented 2026-10-11 14:47:05 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 178157611 (Comments: 1) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 220) | Wenn man mir hier schon einen Teilrevert einbrockt, möchte ich auch, dass die Erklärung dazu dabeisteht :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175716867#c1551481 commented 2026-10-11 14:41:26 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦122 |
| 190339529 (Comments: 2) | Der_Fab (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hatte das Update via Everydoor gemacht, da war das nicht zu sehen. Aber danke. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190339529 commented 2026-10-11 14:34:51 UTC by Der_Fab ♦3 |
| 190341490 (Comments: 3) | Puppele1985 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, dann verstehe ich den Hintergrund. Dazu nur folgende Hinweise: Das Löschen setzt ja voraus, dass alle Hydranten vollständig falsch sind. Das wiederum setzt dann schon sehr umfangreiche Bauarbeiten voraus. Zumal jetzt dabe... commented 2026-10-11 14:32:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
 | 190230489 (Comments: 2) | imiraldz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sorry. Especially for the "addr:city" tag where QC prefer the province of Quebec, not the city. commented 2026-10-11 14:31:36 UTC by imiraldz ♦12 |
| 190182631 (Comments: 8) | ATROXUS (Discussed changesets: 6) | Okay, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288594486 hat jetzt beide Nummern. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-11 14:28:39 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190322404 (Comments: 1) | LQui (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, j'ai corrigé le parking de l’hôtel de ville (attention à ne pas confondre les multipolygones, qui représentent des surfaces homogènes (exemple un lac), avec les relations site qui listent l... commented 2026-10-11 14:11:16 UTC by Yunan973 ♦182 |
| 54314748 (Comments: 1) | Nosatenko Vitalii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Czy ten motel jeszcze istnieje? Pytam, bo jego strona internetowa padła. commented 2026-10-11 14:00:22 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦423 |
| 190331797 (Comments: 2) | fluffycupcakes (Discussed changesets: 4) | "please don't" what commented 2026-10-11 13:51:25 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦34 |
| 180852235 (Comments: 1) | lorisobi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Das alte Trafohäuschen way/1496103849 wurde bereits durch eine neue kompakte "Box" node/13686694591 ersetzt Ich entferne das alte Gebäude wieder. (im Esri Luftbild sieht man den Zeitpunkt vom Umbau) commented 2026-10-11 13:50:46 UTC by sembelst134 ♦68 |
| 190350259 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 31) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-10-11 13:49:33 UTC by sahshoor ♦38 |
| 190323840 (Comments: 1) | bbrice8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Les appellations du type "Sentier Rural n°53" ne sont pas des noms mais des descriptions Il faut plutôt mettre ref=R53. Bien cordialement, commented 2026-10-11 13:40:49 UTC by acubens71 ♦54 |
| 190309064 (Comments: 3) | TinaLeo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich habe endlich ein Mapillary-Bild gefunden, auf dem die Bank zu sehen ist - und Du hast recht, die Bank ist ellenlang! Dann drücke ich mal denen, die dort sitzen, um mitgenommen zu werden, die Daumen . . Gruß Tino commented 2026-10-11 13:29:35 UTC by einufo ♦26 |
| 190337055 (Comments: 2) | Ken Kambi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay, thank you for the feedback. commented 2026-10-11 13:26:29 UTC by Ken Kambi ♦2 |
| 189659370 (Comments: 2) | KEVIN KYLE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! I updated the barangay boundary because the previous boundary was outdated based on the CLUP paranaque map because I will be using the La Huerta boundary for my study. If it looks incorrect, please feel free to revert it or let me know how I can ... commented 2026-10-11 13:24:32 UTC by KEVIN KYLE ♦1 |
| 190348407 (Comments: 1) | OneLoneRanger (Discussed changesets: 19) | Used relation/537322 as a reference for tagging commented 2026-10-11 13:08:07 UTC by OneLoneRanger ♦19 |
| 185413141 (Comments: 2) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 192) | Про какой объект вы пишете? В этой правке просто добавлены теги. А что удалено? commented 2026-10-11 12:59:05 UTC by neo-plan ♦115 |
| 174850996 (Comments: 1) | Tobi3103 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, die Hydranten hattest du ja halbwegs "frisch" erfasst. Jetzt hat die jemand zusammen mit anderen Hydranten hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13316156058 gelöscht. Hast du eine Ahnung, wieso die Hydranten "falsch... commented 2026-10-11 12:50:15 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190204974 (Comments: 1) | Aishu_2k5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190347222 commented 2026-10-11 12:43:08 UTC by MappingMore ♦773 |
| 190335908 (Comments: 2) | deichvogt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich hab das jetzt mal dem weiteren Verlauf innerorts angepasst. Und ab jetzt konzentriere ich mich wieder auf Häuser, die sind einfacher. ;-) commented 2026-10-11 12:38:02 UTC by deichvogt ♦3 |
| 190343568 (Comments: 1) | jhlnleu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag jh... Die hut staat toch al op de kaart. Ik heb je bijdrage verwijderd, want die is dubbel. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-11 12:29:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190325610 (Comments: 2) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 36) | Danke für die Überarbeitung. Der iD-Editor macht die Sortierung nur automatisch. Das hat da nicht geklappt und mir wurde es auch zu spät. commented 2026-10-11 12:21:40 UTC by BB-plan ♦17 |
| 153075671 (Comments: 1) | amnmalik (Discussed changesets: 4) | What did you mean to map here: way/129537288? It has no tags. commented 2026-10-11 12:19:48 UTC by Vi2727 ♦29 |
| 190311902 (Comments: 2) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 124) | ¡Hola! Error mío, lo siento. Debía decir: barrier=chain access=no. Ya está corregido. ¡Gracias! commented 2026-10-11 12:10:37 UTC by dcapillae ♦462 |
| 150778463 (Comments: 2) | Jorisbo (Discussed changesets: 212) | Hi Biff, thanks for the remark. I don't know. Someone else added the conditional=no value. Kind regards, Joris commented 2026-10-11 11:48:38 UTC by Jorisbo ♦166 |
| 189971191 (Comments: 1) | magsi rashid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190344262 commented 2026-10-11 11:42:11 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190343862 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 234) | I fail to see why the segments were "highway=primary". Sha Lek Highway handles cross-district traffic excellently. Sha Tin Wai Road therefore does not handle cross-district traffic, and cannot be "highway=primary". commented 2026-10-11 11:35:14 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦229 |
| 190339645 (Comments: 1) | 12345gfffff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for contributing to OSM. I reviewed your changeset and noticed that you added a name to woodland way 289856418, along with leaf_type=broadleaved and leaf_cycle=semi_evergreen. Could you explain how you verified the wood... commented 2026-10-11 11:33:01 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 184477687 (Comments: 1) | sailing_fred (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mit dieser Änderung wurde der Name "Fleckkanal" auf den Umriss des NSG way/523711838 gesetzt. Das kann kaum richtig sein. Wenn damit ein Zweitname des Hagenburger Kanals gemeint ist, könnte auf way/28472793 alt_name=Fleckka... commented 2026-10-11 11:07:22 UTC by Hb- ♦388 |
| 187330910 (Comments: 1) | Adraxar (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted commented 2026-10-11 11:06:30 UTC by AdrianLangtry ♦20 |
| 189895780 (Comments: 5) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 127) | "przejechać można" rowerem w poprzek drogi czy samochodem drogą? W jaki sposób jest tam legalny przejazd rowerem a nielegalne przejście jak jest to wyznakowane? Czy to jest po prostu dzika ścieżka w poprzek dwujez... commented 2026-10-11 11:00:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 130687097 (Comments: 1) | Balaabirami (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ho rimosso dei marciapiedi inesistenti: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190342006 La cosa strana è che, questo ad esempio, fino a v3 erano corretto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124963088/history poi è stato aggi... commented 2026-10-11 10:56:13 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,948 |
| 189618744 (Comments: 1) | Richardweiß (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Richard! Warum "pappst" du die ganzen Flächen wieder an die Straßenmittelachsen, nachdem ich mir die Mühe gemacht habe, sie von den Straßen zu trennen? Ich weiß, daß es hier verschiedene Sichtwe... commented 2026-10-11 10:39:50 UTC by BrummsLee ♦70 |
| 189884797 (Comments: 1) | ChezFrogLegs (Discussed changesets: 36) | Nothing quite like a "temporary closure" of something to become permanent. Thank you for updating this. Side note, should the contra-flow cycle lanes be mapped as separate, or mapped as "oneway:bicycle=no" on Sheep Street a... commented 2026-10-11 10:37:14 UTC by 0235 ♦55 |
| 190322122 (Comments: 2) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Usunąłem go commented 2026-10-11 10:37:09 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190328328 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM7 (Discussed changesets: 11) | адрес на здании должен соответствовать названию, стоящему на линии полигона. На полигоне коттеджного поселка название без КП commented 2026-10-11 10:31:31 UTC by literan ♦7,248 |
| 190092912 (Comments: 1) | òptica valira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gràcies per la vostra contribució. He traslladat al mapa el punt de l'òptica. El local anterior l'he deixar com local buit. Salutacions! --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2026-10-11 10:25:42 UTC by Jose Luis Infante ♦483 |
| 190326391 (Comments: 2) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 43) | Das beruht auf stupider Umsetzung der vorhandenen Beschilderung im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland . Das Gefahrenzeichen wurde nur an einem Ende der Straße errichtet und gilt nur zu bestimmten Zei... commented 2026-10-11 10:18:30 UTC by Biff ♦40 |
| 174327044 (Comments: 4) | kudlav (Discussed changesets: 1) | V PTNA vypisuje: 'gtfs:route_id:CZ-IDSJMK' of Route is not set but 'gtfs:route_id:CZ-IDSJMK' = 'L35D99' of Route-Master is set: Relation 14106138 (iD, JOSM, UNROLL, GTFS!). Vzhledem k tomu, že to nemá nyn... commented 2026-10-11 10:05:01 UTC by Pavel_Š ♦14 |
| 190322751 (Comments: 1) | Fenix-I5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | У вас заброшенная ж/д улетела из-под Ульяновска в Армению :) Поправил commented 2026-10-11 10:04:31 UTC by mos_next_door ♦51 |
| 190335357 (Comments: 1) | MelYouThere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-11 09:59:38 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 189915049 (Comments: 6) | tafla- (Discussed changesets: 11) | Podałes w jednym wątku 3 rózne propozycje dróg. Teraz są 2 łapki w góre i 3 w dół. Myślisz, że to wystarczy i dotyczy wszystkich trzech propozycji? Większosc osób zatwierdziło zmianę z Kłodzka do Wałbrzy... commented 2026-10-11 09:04:51 UTC by voltairovicz ♦258 |
| 190335815 (Comments: 1) | snapp-map-editor (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I reviewed this changeset and found several serious data-quality issues with the automated edits. At least five ways have suspicious text appended to their street names: Way 31844380: "بلوار سرو شرقی" &ra... commented 2026-10-11 08:54:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 180461808 (Comments: 2) | Andrea Del Sarto (Discussed changesets: 67) | Ciao, grazie. avevo sistemato solo quelle che ho inserito io ;) 7452203 > avevo già sistemato 16391483 > avevo già sistemato 16391484 > avevo già sistemato 16391716 > avevo già sistemato 1... commented 2026-10-11 08:54:24 UTC by Andrea Del Sarto ♦89 |
| 186224624 (Comments: 3) | deichvogt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich erfasse die immer nur als Knoten des highway-Weges und trenne den dann dort, um zone:traffic=* entsprechend setzen zu können. Sonderfall sind Ortsschilder, die auf beiden Seiten verschiedene Namen haben, wo man also innerorts bleibt. Da b... commented 2026-10-11 08:53:14 UTC by GerdP ♦2,888 |
| 189935159 (Comments: 1) | mj dziendziel (Discussed changesets: 9) | What's all this about? These streets don't exist. commented 2026-10-11 08:41:11 UTC by liebezeit ♦9 |
| 182444183 (Comments: 1) | CrashLogger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Estimado CrashLogger: Como el https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9795187881 del ascensor ya existía, ahora parece que hay dos ascensores; cuando en realidad solo hay uno. Un saludo commented 2026-10-11 08:39:25 UTC by Davileci ♦146 |
| 189342498 (Comments: 1) | mcbax (Discussed changesets: 7) | "oneway=no: Dieser Werte sollte nur benutzt werden, wenn ausdrücklich, um Verwechslungen zu vermeiden, signalisiert werden soll, daß es sich bei dem Weg um keine Einbahnstraße handelt." 4 m breite Betonstraßen wird... commented 2026-10-11 08:39:00 UTC by BrummsLee ♦70 |
| 190288881 (Comments: 3) | cpeuvrel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, yes it's my bad, when I created this challenge I wasn't aware that I should have deleted the name at the same time. I created this other challenge after your comment to fix that. commented 2026-10-11 08:29:26 UTC by cpeuvrel ♦1 |
| 190333407 (Comments: 5) | BasvS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Naam aangepast... Wat er te doen is hoort niet in de naam. commented 2026-10-11 08:20:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 165545316 (Comments: 3) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 88) | ⛳ top :) commented 2026-10-11 08:19:48 UTC by chris2map ♦61 |
| 190256221 (Comments: 1) | Local Update (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1566827288/ man_made=wastewater_plant is used for the overall site. This individual objects is natural=water and water=wastewater commented 2026-10-11 08:15:57 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,282 |
| 189802219 (Comments: 1) | CLAUDE999 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Please use gauge instead of guage. commented 2026-10-11 08:15:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,887 |
| 189972578 (Comments: 4) | Tozطز (Discussed changesets: 1) | All other changes of @Tozطز seem to be nonsense as well, so I reverted all edits of this user. commented 2026-10-11 08:05:03 UTC by map per ♦1,349 |
| X | 190135264 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 146) | I have no objections. This revert was only done because the user making the road class changes did so on a grand scale without the agreement of the local community. commented 2026-10-11 07:50:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190241239 (Comments: 5) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 72) | not sure why i wait. to be honest. i normally wait like a week. ill update it right now commented 2026-10-11 07:34:07 UTC by ieguy3 ♦74 |
| 190331071 (Comments: 3) | Pylian (Discussed changesets: 4) | CTRL-F5 voor het effect commented 2026-10-11 07:26:24 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190326874 (Comments: 1) | Pylian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Pylian, Wanneer de hondenspeelplaats werkelijk de naam Hondenspeelplaats Beekpark heet dan is is correct, maar meestal hebben die veldjes geen officieel uitgegeven naam. In dat geval beter de naam verwijderen. Het Beekpark kan als vl... commented 2026-10-11 07:14:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190326301 (Comments: 2) | Pylian (Discussed changesets: 4) | artist_name verwijderd van het gebouw. Bedoel je wellicht architect? MVG eggie commented 2026-10-11 07:10:59 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190327156 (Comments: 1) | Pylian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Pylian, Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG en dus precies ingemeten. Je kunt geen schuingenomen luchtopname gebruiken op een gebouw uit te lijnen. Overkappingen maken geen onderdeel uit van de vaste structuur van het gebouw. |
| 190332052 (Comments: 1) | Rikstamaps$ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I deleted this business node placed on the roadway. Businesses need to be mapped at the verifiable location they operate from. commented 2026-10-11 07:05:18 UTC by nevw ♦2,367 |
| 190260013 (Comments: 1) | Vincent44600 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, tout me semble correcte, les modifications suivent les directives de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling Il faut quand même faire attention, car sur les imageries aériennes ils y a un peu p... commented 2026-10-11 06:58:46 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 190321832 (Comments: 1) | Zenzza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-11 06:58:09 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190270320 (Comments: 1) | czennes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, bravo pour cette première contribution ! J'ai corrigé les attributs de votre salon de beauté en shop=beauty à la place de shop=supermarket. J'ai aussi modifié le format du numéro de t&ea... commented 2026-10-11 06:49:15 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 190331613 (Comments: 3) | Mhall7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt voor de advies, ik zal het proberen commented 2026-10-11 06:43:42 UTC by Mhall7 ♦1 |
| 190326483 (Comments: 1) | Savagev2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, could you please double check this changeset? I think you mistakenly removed the boundary=administrative tag and as a result the location doesn't appear on Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&o... commented 2026-10-11 06:14:16 UTC by vricciardulli ♦43 |
| 190328928 (Comments: 1) | hung171 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Chào bạn, bạn vui lòng cung cấp nguồn ảnh vệ tinh cho các tòa nhà bạn đang thêm vào bản đồ ở khu vực Thanh Oai được không? Nếu không thì mình bu... commented 2026-10-11 05:04:46 UTC by vietnam321 ♦24 |
| 189980532 (Comments: 5) | tubeless (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sepertinya anda mempertanyakan tentang tag destination yang saya tempelkan. Kalau iya, sepertinya anda sendiri yg harus belajar lagi. commented 2026-10-11 04:12:51 UTC by tubeless ♦5 |
| 190319476 (Comments: 1) | HellMap (Discussed changesets: 113) | Thanks I forgot to delete the smaller subdivision)) commented 2026-10-11 04:11:08 UTC by evdence ♦43 |
| 190178865 (Comments: 1) | afterbell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190328983 commented 2026-10-11 03:32:47 UTC by MappingMore ♦773 |
| 178634563 (Comments: 2) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 55) | Langsung ditambahkan saja. Pengunanya sudah diban. commented 2026-10-11 03:06:46 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190210251 (Comments: 1) | Dang Tu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Chào bạn. Bạn tạo chỉnh sửa thì nên làm cẩn thận một chút. Đừng ghi lung tung như tên trường mà bạn đã ghi ở đây. commented 2026-10-11 02:58:43 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦60 |
| 190328212 (Comments: 1) | TronnaLegacy (Discussed changesets: 4) | Used a script to adjust tags on elements that I personally surveyed in recent weeks to add data based on what I saw during the survey commented 2026-10-11 02:24:29 UTC by TronnaLegacy ♦7 |
| 190328174 (Comments: 1) | TronnaLegacy (Discussed changesets: 4) | Used a script to adjust tags on elements that I personally surveyed in recent weeks to add data based on what I saw during the survey commented 2026-10-11 02:22:09 UTC by TronnaLegacy ♦7 |
| 190289784 (Comments: 1) | Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (Discussed changesets: 20) | Satu bangunan ini kenapa dibuat relasi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21603169 commented 2026-10-11 02:03:14 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
 | 190179554 (Comments: 1) | Evaristo Isto (Discussed changesets: 3) | "TL Highest Elevation" is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/349886963 commented 2026-10-11 01:57:32 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190029582 (Comments: 1) | zoeolnkva (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-places-how-to/146986/3 commented 2026-10-11 01:51:39 UTC by FajrAl ♦970 |
| 190327615 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 304) | I forgot to change the source. The actual URL is https://youtube.com/watch?v=EUKmKZSKfXI&t=55. commented 2026-10-11 01:36:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦386 |
| 190304390 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190304431 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190304614 (Comments: 2) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190304565 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190304549 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190302531 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190301883 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190304327 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190303839 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190303721 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190301910 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190280427 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190301641 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190280434 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190280384 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190280370 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190280363 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190265268 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190265204 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190266117 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190265033 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190264878 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190264733 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190264352 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190264236 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190264062 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190263740 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190263600 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190263672 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190263459 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190263234 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190209047 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190208640 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190208960 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190208761 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327605 commented 2026-10-11 01:34:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190236279 (Comments: 1) | Evg388 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Что вы пытались обозначить? commented 2026-10-11 01:28:09 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,786 |
| 190208523 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190157449 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190157741 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190157883 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190207351 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190208043 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190157122 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190157419 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190156599 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190156472 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190155337 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190157379 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190155039 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190155082 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190104452 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190104487 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190104562 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190154746 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190154944 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190104360 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190103719 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190103901 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190104427 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190104390 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190104076 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190103430 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190103372 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190103183 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190103331 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 189736947 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 189591355 (Comments: 1) | Ozancopur (Discussed changesets: 66) | DWG revert - fictitious mapping & improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190327324 commented 2026-10-11 01:08:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190317197 (Comments: 1) | kc350twin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM, if it exists on the ground please dont remove it from OSM. Instead update the feature type tag from road to a driveway and set the access tags to private. You may Improve OSM data, but can not destroy it. Once you set the access ta... commented 2026-10-11 01:03:02 UTC by MassCartog ♦492 |
| 188169133 (Comments: 1) | JanezPavelZebovec (Discussed changesets: 17) | > `crossing=no` excludes the existence of a crossing and therefore must be used without `highway=crossing`. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=no node/6154245461 and node/6154245460 don't need to have `railway=crossing` im... commented 2026-10-11 00:23:08 UTC by Vladislav Grechannik ♦10 |
| 190325910 (Comments: 1) | Eiim (Discussed changesets: 3) | *in Sunbury. Why did I say Sawmill? commented 2026-10-10 23:46:32 UTC by Eiim ♦34 |
| 190295777 (Comments: 5) | _EdOnGIS_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the heads up @rab, we are working on it, and I have taken note of the listed way, we will fix that as we progress commented 2026-10-10 23:39:06 UTC by KingVik ♦85 |
| 189452101 (Comments: 1) | BarryMyles (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi. Please do not map areas of predominantly bog as natural=heath, as this tag is used for low, woody plants, and not areas of clearly bog and grassland. Thank you commented 2026-10-10 23:33:20 UTC by finn-hound ♦38 |
| 190317558 (Comments: 1) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | zmiany tych detali nie wyglądaja na poprawne, więc został przywrócone commented 2026-10-10 23:28:01 UTC by Yog Sot ♦585 |
| 190317307 (Comments: 7) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Nazwa zbędna. Jak ktoś chce to do miasta wjedzie, a jak będzie jechał tranzytem to będzie się trzymał pomarańczowej drogi i patrzył na drogowskazy. Najbardziej znane gigantyczne owodniowce https://www.openstreetmap.org/ way/262931676 des... commented 2026-10-10 23:24:37 UTC by Aim311_ ♦165 |
| 190317155 (Comments: 7) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | przyłączam się. Wpierw wierzyłem, że większośc edycji jest prawidłowej jakości, ale teraz jak zaglądam, to bardzo często dostrzegam zbędność, a wręcz błędy edycyjne, tak jak opisane powyżej wynikające z nieznajomości narzędzia ed... commented 2026-10-10 23:18:46 UTC by Yog Sot ♦585 |
| 190315128 (Comments: 1) | Mateo Cappelluti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios: - En el cambio anterior, el edificio, una vez que lo dibujás podés presionar la letra Q en el editor y rectifica los ángulos. - En este cambio, el ... commented 2026-10-10 23:17:31 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦191 |
| 190324893 (Comments: 1) | Precision Guesswork (Discussed changesets: 2) | Your edits and contributions are welcomed. commented 2026-10-10 22:37:34 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦5 |
| 162627146 (Comments: 2) | Zoltán Vashegyi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Helyismeret, itt élek. A közösség már 10+ éve így hívja ezeket az utakat, a dombot. Különben mindegy, mert 1 éven belül itt teljesen újra kell majd szinte mindent rajzol... commented 2026-10-10 22:31:04 UTC by Zoltán Vashegyi ♦1 |
| 190322005 (Comments: 1) | sffra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Mo-Fr 6:00-24:00 Sa, So, Feiertag 7:00-22:00 commented 2026-10-10 22:09:42 UTC by sffra ♦2 |
| 190309231 (Comments: 3) | Chrissi3786 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, dann handelt es sich um einen normalen Unterflurhydranten? Dann müsste raus: Die Nennweite. Der Durchfluss kommt in flow_rate. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-10 22:06:04 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190291113 (Comments: 1) | Maloss34 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ciao Maloss34, se gli edifici che inserisci hanno angoli retti dovresti tracciarli come tali... Se usi iD basta premere il tasto Q per rendere la geometria ortogonale. commented 2026-10-10 22:04:20 UTC by totera ♦369 |
| 190308288 (Comments: 3) | Chrissi3786 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, das wäre dann eher so, wie ich es geschrieben habe. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-10 22:03:14 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190307398 (Comments: 3) | Chrissi3786 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, ja, genau: Deswegen wird beim Unterflurhydranten keine Kupplungsanzahl angegeben, weil es keine reine Schlauchkupplung ist. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-10 22:01:35 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190324072 (Comments: 1) | Amaan Maki (Discussed changesets: 1) | addr:city\tGashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia addr:street\t6HW75944+77 education\tsecondary school grades\t5 up to 12 name\tBanano Boarding School operator\tBanano Boarding School operator:type\tgovernment religion\tmuslim commented 2026-10-10 21:57:39 UTC by Amaan Maki ♦1 |
| 188737966 (Comments: 3) | Cuddlycactus2142 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it. I did see a Facebook post (dated Aug. 29) stating that they did add a camera to it so it may be the case. Thanks. (and F Flock) commented 2026-10-10 21:50:21 UTC by Mr Matt K ♦8 |
| 187907498 (Comments: 6) | oildelog (Discussed changesets: 9) | Das kann man morgen in PTNA sehen. Über Nacht werden die Daten immer aktualisiert. commented 2026-10-10 21:47:13 UTC by bernward1 ♦54 |
| 189796501 (Comments: 8) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 29) | Je m’inquiète effectivement un peu au sujet de ces contributions "amélioration bâtiment". Peut-être que la qualité des contributions est meilleure dans le pays principal, mais les échantillons q... commented 2026-10-10 21:43:14 UTC by 9_tab ♦161 |
| 190302193 (Comments: 3) | alueckmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die schnelle Antwort, dann habe ich das jetzt entsprechend angepasst. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190323667 commented 2026-10-10 21:40:47 UTC by Tatfahren ♦393 |
| 190318889 (Comments: 1) | autoAWS (Discussed changesets: 67) | This was performed as part of testing of autoAWS v2.1.0. Strangely, this changes an address previously known as Skovsbovænge 30 to Tankefuldvej 55 preserving the osak:identifier. This is, however, in accordance with the current stat... commented 2026-10-10 21:34:54 UTC by mikini ♦72 |
| 190322289 (Comments: 1) | Pätz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Any reason removing the sport=climbing and climbing=crag tag but leaving the other climbing tags in place? commented 2026-10-10 21:32:27 UTC by elnappo ♦10 |
| 190300480 (Comments: 4) | Geim (Discussed changesets: 86) | Ah, waarschijnlijk stond die laag nog aan en heeft josm dat er bijgezet. commented 2026-10-10 21:28:10 UTC by Geim ♦219 |
| 190320881 (Comments: 1) | Mark_S (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks for splitting terraces up in Keswick! It’s been long overdue. Very happy to see you’re paying attention to the Cadastral Parcels and adding UPRNs, that’s very appreciated. Please be careful to update the building taggi... commented 2026-10-10 20:53:13 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,136 |
| 190317368 (Comments: 5) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | ŻE WYPADAŁOBY DRUGI USUNĄĆ! A NIE ROBIĆ DUPLIKAT I ZOSTAWIAĆ! NIE MOŻE BYĆ DUPLIKATÓW! commented 2026-10-10 20:45:47 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190317074 (Comments: 2) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Edycja została wycofana. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-10 20:42:44 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190317639 (Comments: 1) | bmwhidden (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the edit and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-10-10 20:41:38 UTC by pwbriggs ♦507 |
| 183239885 (Comments: 1) | shetto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wieso hast du hier die Kreuzung Dörfle/Sportplatzstraße zur Grenzrelation von Ödsbach (r7088898/history/3) hinzugefügt? commented 2026-10-10 20:36:09 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦122 |
| 190211241 (Comments: 2) | Rademacher Livia (Discussed changesets: 1) | @koastoas revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190320893 und anschließend als Spam-Konto gemeldet commented 2026-10-10 20:17:52 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,284 |
| 188426873 (Comments: 2) | NKA (Discussed changesets: 153) | Om du er kjent her så tag hvordan du vil. Pedestrian er normalt skiltet gågate. commented 2026-10-10 20:11:31 UTC by NKA ♦256 |
| 190320204 (Comments: 1) | Glyphe (Discussed changesets: 5) | See this post for more detail: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/13 commented 2026-10-10 19:59:28 UTC by Glyphe ♦23 |
| 190296174 (Comments: 3) | 2894 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21411 commented 2026-10-10 19:58:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190320165 (Comments: 1) | cswilson252 (Discussed changesets: 6) | *Jane St commented 2026-10-10 19:57:42 UTC by cswilson252 ♦33 |
| 190318541 (Comments: 1) | Money Moustache (Discussed changesets: 8) | If you want to add more you can use the OS OpenMap Local layer which has basic building outlines commented 2026-10-10 19:52:51 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,319 |
| 190301873 (Comments: 3) | jboerg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Top. Danke commented 2026-10-10 19:48:06 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,405 |
| 190303156 (Comments: 3) | sjssbujhhuu (Discussed changesets: 6) | 👍 commented 2026-10-10 19:46:08 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190302798 (Comments: 5) | sjssbujhhuu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thx... commented 2026-10-10 19:45:33 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
 | 190177298 (Comments: 1) | Yohan_MR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190319669 commented 2026-10-10 19:45:07 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190270191 (Comments: 1) | RIL91 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please do not add cyclestreet-tags in Germany. This theme is not used in Germany. commented 2026-10-10 19:43:15 UTC by limes11 ♦1,136 |
| 190206673 (Comments: 1) | Woh01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190319376 commented 2026-10-10 19:37:06 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 189948621 (Comments: 1) | aquaffe (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, bei relation/21478844 ist type "kit" vmtl. ein Schreibfehler? (multipolygon ?) Betrifft auch ein paar ältere Edits, so ca. 50 Solarpark-Relationen in Brandenburg. Grüße commented 2026-10-10 19:36:53 UTC by onterof ♦74 |
| 189307677 (Comments: 1) | CanuckGeographer (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted changeset that drew long-gone abandoned railways with no rail infrastructure present on the ground; railways that don't exist on the ground are suited for OpenHistoricalMap (OHM), and OpenRailwayMap now also shows OpenHistoricalMap rail... commented 2026-10-10 19:36:16 UTC by cswilson252 ♦33 |
| 190292801 (Comments: 1) | evdence (Discussed changesets: 87) | Atkal izdzēsti desmitiem elementi. Un pēc tam nepareizi sazīmēts ar kļudām. Izmaiņa atcelta. commented 2026-10-10 19:35:39 UTC by HellMap ♦1,002 |
| 190086841 (Comments: 7) | Airboss225 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja, das passt so. Danke :-) commented 2026-10-10 19:30:21 UTC by aixbrick ♦946 |
 | 190176722 (Comments: 1) | Mg@kumar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190319188 commented 2026-10-10 19:30:12 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190002137 (Comments: 4) | Carte-on (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oh wow! It’s an incredibly vast amount of small updates to do. Bravo to you! So I have done the fix. It was a simple mistake: I imported all the Osmose bug points into JOSM to process them, and for this point I forgot to remove those tag... commented 2026-10-10 19:27:58 UTC by Carte-on ♦4 |
| 190229345 (Comments: 2) | Monolo23 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hola Entiendo tu argumento, pero creo que conviene distinguir entre la oficialidad de un topónimo y su uso en castellano. La etiqueta `name:es` de OpenStreetMap no exige que una denominación sea oficial, sino que exista un uso re... commented 2026-10-10 19:24:32 UTC by Monolo23 ♦18 |
| 189273572 (Comments: 2) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 59) | As there was no place= node for Ridgehill, I assumed it was an error in the same way addr:suburb=Rothwell was. Thank you for adding the missing node, I have chosen to upgrade it to hamlet as there are a handful of houses here. commented 2026-10-10 19:24:17 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦412 |
| 190316847 (Comments: 1) | HardPanGolf (Discussed changesets: 1) | I will this go without reverting immediately but "delete first, retrace later" is not how we work in OSM. Instead, you would ideally improve the existing geometries (some editors have explicit tooling support for that kind of edit), or if a... commented 2026-10-10 19:22:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190202672 (Comments: 2) | Monolo23 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Buenas, Soy vecino de Calafell y conozco personalmente las calles que he editado. Mi intención al añadir name:es es documentar las denominaciones en castellano que tienen uso real, sin modificar ni sustituir los nombres oficiales... commented 2026-10-10 19:16:18 UTC by Monolo23 ♦18 |
| 187940208 (Comments: 2) | StoneSphere (Discussed changesets: 1) | I didn't know what those numbers were, just that they were incorrectly set as name_1, which is the outdated version of "Altname" I was just updating outdated tags commented 2026-10-10 19:15:59 UTC by StoneSphere ♦3 |
| 166894913 (Comments: 1) | Deep Thought (Discussed changesets: 2) | Du hast hier ein Duplikat der Schanzenbäckerei erstellt. Habe es entfernt, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5519392 . Bitte in Zukunft drauf achten, ob es das Objekt bereits gibt ;) commented 2026-10-10 19:03:03 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦355 |
| 190238275 (Comments: 2) | radokado (Discussed changesets: 14) | Nepoznám. Upravoval som cestu podľa DTM high resolution, a ten "občasný" potok bol ustrelený v kopci commented 2026-10-10 18:55:08 UTC by radokado ♦5 |
| 185274944 (Comments: 1) | Néoven (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, la clef "material" ne convient pas, voici un lien vers le wiki qui montre un cas similaire avec deux matériaux : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:backrest:material Si je comprends bien, l'assise et le dossier ... commented 2026-10-10 18:53:20 UTC by Mattam ♦5 |
| 190286172 (Comments: 1) | Amarela moi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Este changeset incumple los criterios de la wiki sobre el uso de la eitqueta name:xx=*: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Galicia/Etiquetado_toponimia. Además, la descripción del changeset no se corresponde con lo que se ha... commented 2026-10-10 18:49:52 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,889 |
| 190310486 (Comments: 1) | mjr2295 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bore da Please keep your changesets to sensible areas. In the case of your edits, please only map one course at a time. Please also leave better comments that explain what you are doing. Diolch Phil commented 2026-10-10 18:49:45 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,864 |
| 189984588 (Comments: 2) | reiberl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, deine Änderungen ausschließlich auf der Basis von GIS-Daten – zumindest lässt dies der Changeset-Kommentar vermuten – stellt einen unabgestimmten Import dar. Deine früheren Importe liegen so weit zurü... commented 2026-10-10 18:49:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 189977921 (Comments: 1) | reiberl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, deine Änderungen ausschließlich auf der Basis von GIS-Daten – zumindest lässt dies der Changeset-Kommentar vermuten – stellt einen unabgestimmten Import dar. Deine früheren Importe liegen so weit zurü... commented 2026-10-10 18:49:33 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190311679 (Comments: 1) | mythres113 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-10 18:43:47 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190300528 (Comments: 1) | Tom021070 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, bitte die Namen löschen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-10 18:38:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190300319 (Comments: 1) | Tom021070 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, in das Feld "ref" kommt ausschließlich die Hydrantennummer. Bitte löschen den Familiennamen zeitnah aus den Daten, personenbezogene Daten haben in OSM nichts zu suchen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-10 18:38:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 190300055 (Comments: 1) | Tom021070 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Hydranten haben keinen Namen. Würdest du diesen wieder löschen? Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-10-10 18:36:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,685 |
| 110254636 (Comments: 2) | msondergaard (Discussed changesets: 13) | - It is indeed a natural spring. Confirmed both from survey and høje målebordsblade. It is also too high compared to the surrounding terrain to be from drainage. - Where Dokkebæk starts is a bit fuzzy. The higher elevation parts... commented 2026-10-10 18:25:05 UTC by msondergaard ♦6 |
| 135134983 (Comments: 4) | Amenophis (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello, thank you for pointing that out. There were incorrect entries that I have just corrected. commented 2026-10-10 17:57:53 UTC by Amenophis ♦8 |
| 190282474 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 32) | Please don't add own transliterations. They aren't real proper names. `*name:zh-t-en=` has already been added. commented 2026-10-10 17:48:26 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190302139 (Comments: 3) | Atlas47 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bon week-end à vous aussi 😊 commented 2026-10-10 17:42:09 UTC by Lascar_s ♦14 |
| 189455605 (Comments: 1) | neelyjoe12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please do not map features that do not exist yet. Please only map what exists currently on the ground. Thanks! commented 2026-10-10 17:40:29 UTC by Joseph R P ♦468 |
| 190246166 (Comments: 2) | Zbyněk Vacek (Discussed changesets: 1) | PS. Oblast jsem opravil. commented 2026-10-10 17:36:02 UTC by Dvorný ♦49 |
| 185787179 (Comments: 1) | trakais (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, when drawing cycleways/footways and such, please don't connect them to administrative borders. Or any other feature that is not physically connected to it. Thanks. commented 2026-10-10 17:34:14 UTC by HellMap ♦1,002 |
| 133702284 (Comments: 4) | wilpin (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks for spotting it ! commented 2026-10-10 17:28:13 UTC by wilpin ♦6 |
| 141880292 (Comments: 1) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Edycja jest bezsensowna, rowery i tak są prowadzone taką drogą przez nawigacje. Wycofane. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-10 17:26:17 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190308713 (Comments: 6) | DH72 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 In het begin is alles abacadabra. Gaat vanzelf over. ID is de webeditor voor de pc. BAG is de administratie van het Kadaster even kort door de bocht. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-10-10 17:23:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 186402919 (Comments: 1) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Nazwa została usunięta - nie ma w terenie takiej nazwy, nigdzie też takiej nie znalazłem commented 2026-10-10 17:23:03 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190282279 (Comments: 1) | GasaiYuno (Discussed changesets: 69) | 1. Such `name=` should be avoided, unless you are sure it will be named as that (cf Olympic Avenue Light Public Housing). It's to avoid disagreements (eg "Public Housing" or RS "Subsidized Residential"? Some may think PH mean... commented 2026-10-10 17:18:31 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,084 |
| 190300408 (Comments: 1) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-10 17:18:29 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190300525 (Comments: 1) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Edycja jest nieprawidłowa - te nazwy nie powinny zawierać nazwy firmy - i została wycofana. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-10 17:13:35 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190184951 (Comments: 1) | Shizuku6512 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190313581 commented 2026-10-10 17:12:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦593 |
| 190301419 (Comments: 2) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Wycofałem tę edycję. Proszę o uważność przy następnych zmianach. commented 2026-10-10 17:11:13 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 190290977 (Comments: 3) | burningmatt (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2026-10-10 17:09:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190313019 (Comments: 1) | Glyphe (Discussed changesets: 5) | See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/14 commented 2026-10-10 17:03:48 UTC by Glyphe ♦23 |
| 173100332 (Comments: 2) | Jofban (Discussed changesets: 4) | Das war mir vorher nicht bekannt, gut gesehen. Ich hab mich an der vorher bestehenden Nummerierung bei Wiesenau orientiert, die in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60354261/history/8 eingeführt wurde. In meiner Recherche fand ich einen a... commented 2026-10-10 17:02:59 UTC by Jofban ♦18 |
| 168239868 (Comments: 1) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Obiekt nie istnieje i został usunięty. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-10 16:58:50 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 189624296 (Comments: 1) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 49) | You have added some useful things here, but please take care to avoid misusing the name=* tag by including extra information such as "(disused) as you have done on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21446997. A better approach involve... commented 2026-10-10 16:57:57 UTC by tomhukins ♦306 |
| 157074585 (Comments: 2) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Obiekt został usunięty. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-10 16:54:56 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 168239984 (Comments: 1) | Matix 102 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-10-10 16:51:27 UTC by bartgron ♦697 |
| 189205999 (Comments: 1) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 77) | Sind in der Wirklichkeit die Wege https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524108298 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564888632 miteinander verbunden, oder hört https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564888632 abrupt auf der grünen Wiese auf? commented 2026-10-10 16:49:27 UTC by epigen108 ♦15 |
| 190303424 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Pnawn da, diolch am gyfrannu. Please can you ensure that your comments match up to what you do. I notice you haven't included the back extensions of the majority of these properties. I'm not seeing "local backyard boundaries&quo... commented 2026-10-10 16:42:09 UTC by ceirios ♦153 |
| 190292401 (Comments: 3) | Buchenhaini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke dir, kein Thema, mir ist es nur aufgefallen. Schöne Grüße commented 2026-10-10 16:26:36 UTC by M_Gaugg ♦51 |
| 190080615 (Comments: 2) | Tist53 (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai enlevé l'adresse mail. Je ne sais pas pourquoi elle a été marqué. Merci commented 2026-10-10 16:26:30 UTC by Tist53 ♦1 |
| 186292603 (Comments: 1) | karkadeh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour. Bravo et merci pour cette première contribution ! J'ai fait quelques modifications sur ce point d’intérêt sur le partie adresse, en transformant les addr: en contact: Quand le point adresse existe sur la... commented 2026-10-10 16:12:55 UTC by GilB ♦48 |
| 189061598 (Comments: 4) | Hidoo00 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Nope, it's just normal traffic signs, but unauthorized, since a speed limit legally can't be signed lower than 30. It's quite common on private land to have random signs with no authority, since people usually follow them anyways. commented 2026-10-10 16:10:56 UTC by Hidoo00 ♦84 |
| 189718804 (Comments: 1) | BIKE STMK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was genau berechtigt das gesetzte "access=no" auf dieser Straße? Und wozu diese Kaskade an weiteren Zugangsbeschränkungen, die mit "access=no" ohnehin überflüssig sind? commented 2026-10-10 15:54:37 UTC by Sunni24 ♦3 |
| 190290966 (Comments: 3) | joobrou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Kennelijk is het moeilijk tot onmogelijk (?)met organic een bestaande adresnode te selecteren. We zien keer op keer dubbele adressen ontstaan. Idem met CoMaps. Ik gebruik die app niet .. zou je niet kunnen helpen. Het beste gaat ... commented 2026-10-10 15:50:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190294763 (Comments: 2) | linaosm (Discussed changesets: 1) | oké bedankt! commented 2026-10-10 15:50:47 UTC by linaosm ♦1 |
| 189461648 (Comments: 2) | Weronika1101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej, tzn. co dokładnie duplikuje? Nazwa "Wieża ariańska" nie identyfikuje jednoznacznie obiektu, bo to nie jest jedyna taka wieża w Polsce, dlatego dodano też alt_name commented 2026-10-10 15:45:38 UTC by syntex ♦911 |
| 190304461 (Comments: 2) | fch4ng (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks! commented 2026-10-10 15:45:12 UTC by fch4ng ♦1 |
| 190306951 (Comments: 1) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 36) | Moin! Kümmerst Du Dich noch um die Radrouten am Kreisel? commented 2026-10-10 15:44:57 UTC by GerdP ♦2,888 |
| 190220458 (Comments: 8) | AHGr (Discussed changesets: 12) | Oke.. dan klopt het zo. Aan de Lagevoortse weg had ik een hek ingetekend met accesstags. Als zo n hek eeens anders ook staat zou je het kunnen intekenen. Dan op het hek ook emergency=yes en foot=yes taggen..vehicle=no. Mapse commented 2026-10-10 15:44:48 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 189860889 (Comments: 2) | madu21 (Discussed changesets: 23) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5564745 commented 2026-10-10 15:30:10 UTC by YomanNH ♦551 |
| 189895095 (Comments: 3) | marcmarti (Discussed changesets: 15) | It would be much better to follow international convention of using lifecycle prefixes and the construction tags as well as adding a note tag with more information. Currently the tags used here do not exist anywhere else. Data consumers will strug... commented 2026-10-10 15:21:00 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦69 |
| 189977864 (Comments: 2) | trg_l (Discussed changesets: 1) | danke für die hilfe. ist angepasst commented 2026-10-10 15:17:09 UTC by trg_l ♦1 |
| 190294667 (Comments: 2) | Erik Kleijer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Stukje travers van private gehaald. Passages met water opgelost. commented 2026-10-10 14:43:55 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190305684 (Comments: 1) | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 (Discussed changesets: 193) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190305947 commented 2026-10-10 14:31:14 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦603 |
| 190277171 (Comments: 1) | gordo anorexico (Discussed changesets: 68) | Estimado. Borró un Cesfam completo. ¿Ya no existe? ¿O fue un error? salu2 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190277171 commented 2026-10-10 14:30:53 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190234755 (Comments: 1) | ciaraniurdail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to Openstreetmap! It seems like you have deleted paths that go through a private yard. Deleting actually existing features is not recommended on Openstreetmap. If passers-by are not allowed to use the path, access=private sho... commented 2026-10-10 14:30:15 UTC by Viima ♦27 |
| 190303411 (Comments: 1) | DerKartografer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I merged your info with the present addressnode. addr city was missing. Please no space in postcode.. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-10-10 14:13:15 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190191663 (Comments: 1) | Nefedova (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI - они свежее commented 2026-10-10 14:11:29 UTC by Vozduhan ♦3 |
| 190303978 (Comments: 2) | sjssbujhhuu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zet zulke zaken onder note=.. maar die heb je verwijderd? commented 2026-10-10 14:01:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
 | 189490667 (Comments: 2) | CuyuniRiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi user_5359, That was a mistake on my part and I have removed the tag. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! commented 2026-10-10 13:52:46 UTC by CuyuniRiver ♦1 |
| 190302399 (Comments: 1) | sjssbujhhuu (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-10 13:52:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190289816 (Comments: 1) | cpeuvrel (Discussed changesets: 3) | The FAA uses / as separators, OpenStreetMap uses ; instead. Please be consistent with OSM usage. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190289816 commented 2026-10-10 13:51:52 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,613 |
| 190284609 (Comments: 1) | DodaBettaMountain (Discussed changesets: 6) | This time is ok. I wonder why all of you sometimes do it perfectly in one changeset and then, 5 minutes later, get it all wrong. I now have more than 25 instances open in JOSM to correct ADT editions, mainly because of access issues, and some resi... commented 2026-10-10 13:39:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 189705453 (Comments: 1) | Keelen Brown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what does it mean: "oneway==*" on the highway construction North Main Street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563350446, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563350448, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563350447 commented 2026-10-10 13:39:39 UTC by chris2map ♦61 |
| 190290955 (Comments: 1) | FRAG Mapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM is a live worldwide database of ground truth features that are verifiable. Thus opinions or desires should not be mapped. I've amended the two points. You would be better off taking up your concerns with the ... commented 2026-10-10 13:31:11 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,398 |
| 189795853 (Comments: 2) | Zilvervisje (Discussed changesets: 33) | Nou... Er is inderdaad geen uitzondering. Voetgangers moeten zelfs over de parkeerplaats. Het is een allergaartje aan verkeersborden. De fietsroutering gaat ook via de parking. Waarom die bebording er nog staat is me een raadsel. Groet,<... commented 2026-10-10 13:29:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190286106 (Comments: 1) | BaudouinCanal (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Do those roads no longer exist? regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190286106 commented 2026-10-10 13:23:50 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190286628 (Comments: 1) | MonteTitano (Discussed changesets: 3) | Those are private. Regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190286628 commented 2026-10-10 13:22:06 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190287771 (Comments: 1) | DodaBettaMountain (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, please use the access tags. Those are obviously private. regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190287771 commented 2026-10-10 13:21:19 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,473 |
| 190296351 (Comments: 1) | Dolar (Discussed changesets: 14) | Knooppunt lag nog bij de oude aansluiting, die heb ik verplaatst, andere routes daarop aangepast. Het rwn heb ik omgelegd naar het fietspad. Gezien dat je mofa en moped designated hebt gezien, heb ik aangenomen dat het fietspad G12a is en ik he... commented 2026-10-10 13:16:32 UTC by dvdhoven ♦997 |
| 190192499 (Comments: 5) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 133) | so habe ich mich entschieden: Änderungssatz: 190301382 Danke für Deine Hilfe dabei, lieber Helmut commented 2026-10-10 13:07:30 UTC by Scout Jens ♦324 |
| 190301007 (Comments: 1) | VeeBack02 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Forgot to change the name. This added a description from the note openstreetmap.org/note/4382364 commented 2026-10-10 12:59:33 UTC by VeeBack02 ♦6 |
| 190293841 (Comments: 1) | ChairExpert (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted. "roads bx" is not a good explanation. If you cannot explain what you changed and why, then it is probably not worth keeping on the map. The two roads you modified had been previously analysed: * Vanderlinden i... commented 2026-10-10 12:58:06 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 190293884 (Comments: 1) | ChairExpert (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, ChairExpert. Sorry but we had to reject your edit. I spotted this bench on pictures we took in this area; it is around the tree that is in the middle of the intersection… but in the OSM data model, static objects (like trees o... commented 2026-10-10 12:51:07 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,110 |
| 137218358 (Comments: 1) | Andrea Faggian (Discussed changesets: 1) | amenity=car_wash is the appropriate tag for autolavaggi :) I stumbled over them when routing through here with CoMaps last week. Happy mapping, habi commented 2026-10-10 12:45:59 UTC by habi ♦2,283 |
| 190268400 (Comments: 1) | tom3133 (Discussed changesets: 11) | It appears that the name= value was deleted without any replacement. It would be appropriate to fix this and use board:title= or inscription= instead. commented 2026-10-10 12:41:44 UTC by Dvorný ♦49 |
| 190294700 (Comments: 1) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 29) | The table was already mapped as node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8631189526 (I'm looking at *all* notes around Bern, hence here) commented 2026-10-10 12:37:39 UTC by habi ♦2,283 |
| 190287617 (Comments: 1) | crlpln (Discussed changesets: 3) | Не копируйте данные из других карт commented 2026-10-10 12:21:08 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,786 |
| 190261717 (Comments: 2) | TheLoller (Discussed changesets: 1) | made a mistake, this was supposed to be the link to nominatim https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=174885 commented 2026-10-10 12:20:10 UTC by vricciardulli ♦43 |
| 190297979 (Comments: 1) | gavekk (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5564461#map=15/50.58949/22.04395&layers=N commented 2026-10-10 12:05:01 UTC by gavekk ♦12 |
| 190111254 (Comments: 1) | jobri05 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just for info - I split the crossing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1565622967/history in two and added halk of it to the Nene Way to fill in a gap https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=85093 commented 2026-10-10 12:04:03 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦506 |
| 190283680 (Comments: 3) | Flynn Marquardt (Discussed changesets: 27) | I understand your concerns and I think you're right. Since there are almost 6 thousand boundary=religious_administration relations in Poland out of about 13.4 thousand on the entire world and the documentation originated in the Polish community,... commented 2026-10-10 11:59:11 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦126 |
| 190112421 (Comments: 2) | Swingman7000 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Yeah, natural=bay isn't a definition that shows water... commented 2026-10-10 11:47:24 UTC by ICT_maps ♦23 |
| 190207127 (Comments: 1) | SAULET Bruno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190295604 commented 2026-10-10 11:20:18 UTC by MappingMore ♦773 |
| 190290478 (Comments: 1) | 2894 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Why did you split https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186213981 ? commented 2026-10-10 10:45:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190097674 (Comments: 1) | maternity671 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo maternity671, Du hast hier 140 Punkte gelöscht. Das passt nicht zu dem Changeset-Kommentar. Möchstest Du nachträglich erläutern, was Du hier gemacht hast? Beste Grüße, Romwriter commented 2026-10-10 10:44:41 UTC by Romwriter ♦221 |
| 190131692 (Comments: 1) | Luccass (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Luccass, vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Bei diesem Änderungssatz habe ich allerdings Zweifel: (1) Man muss sich hier gegen die Fahrtrichtung bewegen, um auf kürzestem Weg in die Falkenstraße zu kommen, ja. Aber das sa... commented 2026-10-10 10:41:56 UTC by Romwriter ♦221 |
| 190207277 (Comments: 1) | jwilk37 (Discussed changesets: 1) | opis powinien brzmieć: "… między Solskiego 14 a 16" commented 2026-10-10 10:32:43 UTC by jwilk37 ♦1 |
| 186404070 (Comments: 4) | elgon (Discussed changesets: 13) | można i tak, choć w zasadzie powinna być osobna kategoria: łuskowate commented 2026-10-10 10:29:41 UTC by elgon ♦14 |
| 190290845 (Comments: 1) | burningmatt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Matt Probeer eerst de bestaande adresnode te selecteren en dan de info bij te taggen. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-10 10:14:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190243627 (Comments: 4) | evyy (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ja, das verstehe ich. Mir war nicht bewusst, dass die DOP20 Luftbilder nicht mit OpenStreetMap kompatibel sind. Da andere Personen sie auch benutzt haben, dachte ich mir, es wäre Okay. Ich habe sie für einen großen Teil meiner Edits b... commented 2026-10-10 10:09:24 UTC by evyy ♦11 |
| 188175364 (Comments: 3) | ivrohi (Discussed changesets: 1) | btw: ese rio arampampa luce sospechoso. se encuentra a mas de 30 km al sur del pueblo de arampampa commented 2026-10-10 10:07:01 UTC by ivrohi ♦1 |
| 190291983 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 16) | *area I meant to properly type. commented 2026-10-10 10:06:57 UTC by EleGlobe ♦14 |
| 190291328 (Comments: 1) | Irnehfoto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Joi, Je zou het ook even kunnen checken via het forum in het draadje korte vragen korte antwoorden.. Link naar het draadje: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/715 Link naar het... commented 2026-10-10 10:06:40 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190289093 (Comments: 3) | Irnehfoto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tja .. en daar ook weer name=... Ik zal je onze welkomstmail sturen per PB vanuit de Nederlandse OSM community. MVG, eggie commented 2026-10-10 09:58:34 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 179954051 (Comments: 4) | Capla Automotive Protection Lab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Update: a single neutral detailing POI has now been added in changeset 190290669: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14270117618 . Its representative position uses the existing OSM building geometry and this account's earlier local-knowledge ass... commented 2026-10-10 09:33:38 UTC by Capla Automotive Protection Lab ♦1 |
| 190256199 (Comments: 1) | nguyennee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Xin chào, bạn vui lòng không viết tên đường sá, ngõ xóm, trường học, khu dân cư... in hoa tùm lum như vậy, bạn chỉ cần viết như bình thường, viết in hoa... commented 2026-10-10 09:30:43 UTC by vietnam321 ♦24 |
 | 190290121 (Comments: 1) | Koushik Srinivasan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction notice. This changeset unintentionally deleted way 283117385, an untagged 5-node ring from the 2014 eHealthAfrica_imports which was a member of landuse=residential relation 3758226. It outlined the same school compound I then drew... commented 2026-10-10 09:24:49 UTC by Koushik Srinivasan ♦1 |
| 190281856 (Comments: 1) | Dang Tu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Chào bạn. Tại sao bạn lại ghi số tầng của tòa nhà vào thẻ name=* ? Nếu bạn muốn thêm thông tin số tầng của tòa nhà thì bạn có thể ghi vào thẻ... commented 2026-10-10 09:22:12 UTC by vietnam321 ♦24 |
| 190204087 (Comments: 6) | osm_poi_matchmaker (Discussed changesets: 36) | Javítottam már mindent, a nyitvatartásokat is parszoltam a description=*-ből. Nem hiszem, hogy kézzel húztad el őket, mert pont oda húztad mint a korábbi import volt: https://www.openstreetmap... commented 2026-10-10 09:17:00 UTC by infeeeee ♦732 |
| 190242827 (Comments: 3) | codelabs (Discussed changesets: 1) | The name may not have been added, but the geometry (way/line) existed. What you added has been removed since it's duplicate geometry. Add names to existing ways. commented 2026-10-10 09:12:52 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦191 |
| 190289522 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 146) | Forest track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1567029062 and surrounding built-up stuff is only present on lower ESRI imagery zoom levels, goes away when you zoom in. Unclear. commented 2026-10-10 09:09:48 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 180890651 (Comments: 1) | ContactTower (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13707878992 deleted, peak was existed already. Whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13707878993 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13707879000 really have same name (Пик ВЦСПС)? BTW, ... commented 2026-10-10 08:57:37 UTC by ffmp ♦25 |
| 190288775 (Comments: 1) | snapp-map-editor (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I've noticed that many ways have been modified across multiple changesets in the last few minutes, including several street name changes. Could you please explain the reason for these edits and provide sources to verify the cha... commented 2026-10-10 08:56:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,090 |
| 190254916 (Comments: 6) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 134) | I've changed the ones here from community to local_authority and will then use that going forward https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190288534 commented 2026-10-10 08:46:00 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦498 |
| 190071881 (Comments: 6) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dear aldotheapache, have you even read the wiki article pointed out by user MassCartog? Have you understood that you are potentially sabotaging the activities of rescue teams or fire brigades by deleting these paths and - at least in parts - asphalte... commented 2026-10-10 08:37:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190287835 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 146) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 190071881, 190177886, 190286040, 190286092, 190286143. commented 2026-10-10 08:31:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190286143 (Comments: 1) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190287835 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads which was repeated after user had been told not to delete commented 2026-10-10 08:31:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190177886 (Comments: 1) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190287835 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads which was repeated after user had been told not to delete commented 2026-10-10 08:31:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190286092 (Comments: 1) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190287835 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads which was repeated after user had been told not to delete commented 2026-10-10 08:31:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190286040 (Comments: 1) | aldotheapache (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 190287835 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads which was repeated after user had been told not to delete commented 2026-10-10 08:31:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,524 |
| 190144907 (Comments: 6) | hauke-stieler (Discussed changesets: 50) | Ok, so, jetzt entspann dich erst mal wieder. Der Teil "Bis zur Eröffnung [...] und darüber hinaus" von deren Website ist schon mal nicht möglich, beides gleichzeitig geht nämlich nicht, außerdem "kö... commented 2026-10-10 08:31:20 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦355 |
| 189872947 (Comments: 11) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 127) | > mogę cię uspokoić, nie byłoby tak to w taki wypadku na pewno widziałeś wyjaśnienia iż w krajach jak np Polska, znacznie traffic_signals, uncontrolled i unmarked jest doskonale oczywiste i nie trzeba zgadywać co właściwie jest n... commented 2026-10-10 08:05:44 UTC by Yog Sot ♦585 |
| 190277343 (Comments: 3) | dragondamast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, you can add gates to the way and tag them as access=private too. commented 2026-10-10 07:58:17 UTC by ika-chan! ♦444 |
| 189998832 (Comments: 6) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 127) | different changesets, different feedback, so resolving as requested. That's going to take a little bit longer with already partial adjustments like surface updated commented 2026-10-10 07:51:01 UTC by Yog Sot ♦585 |
| 177672763 (Comments: 1) | Bytli (Discussed changesets: 4) | Добрый день. Расскажите, что означает тег id=3 на объектах вокруг аэропорта? Данный тег считается устаревшим. Используйте вместо него тег r... commented 2026-10-10 07:46:41 UTC by ednzxt ♦21 |
| 190284339 (Comments: 2) | ju_bb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nooit een welkomstbericht ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-10 07:32:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 190282440 (Comments: 1) | MAPNlK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, this changeset removed a way and broke several borders: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19910168#map=16/1.30138/103.80933&layers=V https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19910126#map=15/1.30542/103.81492&layers=... commented 2026-10-10 07:31:05 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦89 |
| 190266188 (Comments: 2) | dgeghehe (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21408 commented 2026-10-10 07:08:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190127051 (Comments: 2) | Albert radley (Discussed changesets: 19) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21407 commented 2026-10-10 07:00:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦35,070 |
| 190223077 (Comments: 3) | Magic326 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey Magic Re https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14266031101 There are point about it: Delft is the name of the city so it is highly unlikely the it is the name of the shop. The node was placed on the street and not "in" ... commented 2026-10-10 06:52:41 UTC by Kees 59 ♦143 |
| 189962120 (Comments: 1) | rodikbg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adeg "Prem" ist seit Mitte September dauerhaft geschlossen commented 2026-10-10 06:52:02 UTC by rodikbg ♦1 |
| 190284450 (Comments: 1) | ju_bb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance Svp niet name gebruiken. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-10-10 06:47:08 UTC by eggie ♦47,735 |
| 189957285 (Comments: 2) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, Compound Street, Sonoita Avenue, Crawford Street, Arroyo Boulevard, and Grand Avenue should remain trunk roads. Not only are they the fastest connection between the freeway and Mexican Federal Highway 15, but you technically left a gap in t... commented 2026-10-10 06:11:49 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦386 |
| 153506848 (Comments: 1) | VLD316 (Discussed changesets: 11) | I'm struggling to find the benefit the benefit to pedestrian navigation of adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298812946 as a single way from Rectory Lane -> Birchwood Road -> Furzedown Drive -> Furzedown Road without connecting i... commented 2026-10-10 05:37:05 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,955 |
| 147395548 (Comments: 2) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 348) | Die kurze Antwort ist Ja. Man kann im Allgemeinen ohne Nachfrage etwas Verändern, wenn dadurch die Daten verbessert werden. commented 2026-10-10 05:34:38 UTC by geozeisig ♦249 |
| 178091309 (Comments: 1) | NikosSkouteris (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5564015 ? commented 2026-10-10 05:03:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,274 |
| 190238492 (Comments: 2) | WoSoe (Discussed changesets: 25) | Moin! Wirklich falsch gemacht wäre jetzt übertrieben. Meine Änderungen an der Tennishalle waren eigentlich nur »Beifang«. Hab in JOSM eine Warnung bekommen, dass sich Gebäude/Gebäudeteile überlap... commented 2026-10-10 04:07:43 UTC by WoSoe ♦136 |
| 189879653 (Comments: 9) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 127) | "Mateuszu, jeśli wszystkie przejścia nie maja miec okreslonego typy w związku z tym, że mają wymalowaną zebre, spoko loko. " - moim zdaniem tag crossing= to koszmarek do ogólnego wytępienia i zastąpienia przez sensowne tagi |
| 190224092 (Comments: 3) | Toschi2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für dei Info, habs etwas angepasst. Änderungssatz: 190281085 Commercial POI recorded separately from the building commented 2026-10-10 03:53:10 UTC by pitfire ♦761 |
| 190219702 (Comments: 1) | Trinity Subsurface (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-10 03:49:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190219425 (Comments: 1) | Trinity Subsurface (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-10-10 03:30:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 188812606 (Comments: 1) | Pilcrowconsulting (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mo... commented 2026-10-10 03:25:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,244 |
| 190242099 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 41) | Bonjour, le nom du reseau utilise par IDFM est "Saint-Quentin en Yvelines" est pas SQYbus Cordialement -yxoc commented 2026-10-10 03:22:47 UTC by yxoc ♦58 |
| 190280030 (Comments: 1) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 101) | Looks like you removed the turn lanes and the 1 lane segment. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190280608 commented 2026-10-10 03:14:22 UTC by cubbe8 ♦113 |
| 190257744 (Comments: 1) | ryhuff83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Actually useful changeset descriptions are appreciated. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190257744 commented 2026-10-10 03:13:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,613 |
| 190260553 (Comments: 1) | Llamaben54 (Discussed changesets: 4) | It's generally best to include names on sidewalks and protected cycleways in addition to the carriageways. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190260553 |
| 188600962 (Comments: 2) | wylie39 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Closed, see https://www.penbaypilot.com/article/smokestack-grill-closes-forever-class-1981-helping/77463 commented 2026-10-10 03:02:28 UTC by wylie39 ♦2 |
| 189192009 (Comments: 1) | ureilrey (Discussed changesets: 2) | Are you thinking of waterway=stream + intermittent=yes here? It looks like it's something you can trace back to this tributary: 15.212317 121.048114 commented 2026-10-10 02:59:02 UTC by GOwin ♦903 |
| 190037989 (Comments: 1) | aweech (Discussed changesets: 55) | Correct, this used to be a Burger King, but they tore it down and built a new building commented 2026-10-10 02:38:59 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦153 |
| 190278565 (Comments: 1) | libraryclg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Clarification of changeset: Updated the addresses of Health 1 and Health 2, added an address to Fertitta College of Medicine, and adjusted the sidewalk geometry in front of Health 1 building. The address updates reflect the renaming of Calhoun Road t... commented 2026-10-10 01:17:28 UTC by libraryclg ♦1 |
| 190201347 (Comments: 1) | Mattia Vitturi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Mattia. With your edit you broke the continuity of the multipolygon that represents the Venetian Lagoon. That meant it got invalidated and stopped rendering, so it's showing up on OSM-based maps as dry land now. I've reverted y... commented 2026-10-10 00:28:25 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦663 |
| 190226235 (Comments: 1) | Paul Fisher (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please don’t add access=foot=no unless there is a legal restriction in place, such as signage explicitly prohibiting pedestrian access. commented 2026-10-10 00:24:40 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦198 |