| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 173698139 (Comments: 4) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 59) | Something to note is that reservation is required to access and reservations are very limited. There are two types of reservations available: parking spot and a shuttle bus spot. Other access modes haven't been addressed by Metro Vancouve... commented 2025-10-31 07:10:51 UTC by eerib ♦207 |
 | 173974081 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please split these changesets. This is difficult to discuss. 1. Lung Yuet Rd `=primary` is considered for connecting Cornwall St, not Nam Cheong St 2. When a road ends at roundabouts, the `=roundabout` currently doesn't use its classifi... commented 2025-10-31 06:56:57 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629 |
 | 173944054 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. Ошиблась. Спасибо, поправила commented 2025-10-31 06:53:56 UTC by Ozon OSM12 ♦1 |
 | 173995352 (Comments: 3) | Davit125 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vdaka za promptnu opravu 👍 commented 2025-10-31 06:48:40 UTC by t_ja ♦217 |
 | 174005868 (Comments: 1) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 86) | Oops, reused wrong changeset description. This was a revert on a bad change that violated basic golf course etiquette (fairways crossing over greens) commented 2025-10-31 06:44:50 UTC by b-jazz ♦745 |
 | 173682971 (Comments: 1) | Pèlerin Gris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, attention ce chemin est une voie verte d'après https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4986535 , vous l'avez ajouté comme une piste cyclable. Le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle détaille comment t... commented 2025-10-31 06:37:13 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦216 |
 | 173970158 (Comments: 1) | dotremo (Discussed changesets: 8) | Für zwei verschiedene POIs müssten es auch zwei verschiedene Unternehmen sein. Auch wenn sie 4 Autos im Kundenauftrag verkaufen laut Webseite, ist es wohl in erster Linie eine Autowerkstatt. Falls doch in erster Linie Autohandel, dann ka... commented 2025-10-31 06:31:18 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 173880244 (Comments: 1) | CfrBst (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, attention vous avez glissé sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036659113#map=17/49.406076/1.169132&layers=N commented 2025-10-31 06:30:01 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦216 |
 | 174000473 (Comments: 1) | p7890 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, is civil=yes a duplicate of usage=public ? commented 2025-10-31 06:27:07 UTC by aTarom ♦824 |
| 173994608 (Comments: 1) | Bodensee-Rudi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Rudi, könnte es sein, dass der Poller momentan bloss entfernt wurde aber jederzeit wieder installiert werden könnte? Ciao Rene commented 2025-10-31 06:23:46 UTC by rene78 ♦457 |
| 173969585 (Comments: 1) | dotremo (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, Existiert das Ladenlokal noch? Dann als disused:shop=books stehen lassen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:* Wenn nicht, dann auch den gesamten Node löschen und nicht als Adressenduplikat stehen lass... commented 2025-10-31 06:19:22 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
 | 173994886 (Comments: 2) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | Na upartego zrzut ekranu wrzucasz na jakąś stronę a tu odnośnik. To może być np. https://postimages.org/ lub dysk wirtualny Google czy inny tylko wtedy trzeba udostępnić plik i wygenerować odnośnik. commented 2025-10-31 06:18:52 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦551 |
 | 173921684 (Comments: 1) | Stela_B (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OSM. Could I ask what this shape represents? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445959477 VictorIE commented 2025-10-31 06:02:36 UTC by VictorIE ♦952 |
| 173872766 (Comments: 2) | Pooh01 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Tam gdzie trwa budowa, tam jest pozostawione construction. Tam gdzie jest ukończone i stoją barierki, żeby nie jeździć jest access=no. Rondo na północy też jest formmalnie w budowie (i znajduje sie na landuse=construction), a puszczony ... commented 2025-10-31 06:00:56 UTC by Pooh01 ♦22 |
 | 173999825 (Comments: 1) | makar987654 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset shows a similar pattern to previous vandalism affecting the same elements, involving changes to the highway tag. Those earlier edits were reverted. I would appreciate it if other members of the community could review this change... commented 2025-10-31 05:56:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
 | 173924140 (Comments: 1) | Lockstar (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hi, Some issues in this area some from this changeset. In OSMInspector relation 5948947 (residential) the outer way is broken. The one member relation (residential) doe not have the backyards going to the water front, yet the DCS Base Map ... commented 2025-10-31 05:51:43 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,679 |
| X | 173986225 (Comments: 1) | ery_washere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello ery_washere, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions! I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locati... commented 2025-10-31 05:08:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 127996117 (Comments: 5) | radiotrefoil (Discussed changesets: 54) | actually I'll wait a little to see if they respond to your message commented 2025-10-31 05:05:46 UTC by radiotrefoil ♦115 |
| 170697210 (Comments: 1) | Rwhi13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi I see you've removed the Aboriginal site tags, I raised this with the original mapper at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127996117 if the site is private property and public access is restricted then it's good to add the access=p... commented 2025-10-31 04:35:52 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 169750137 (Comments: 1) | MilkTeaaa (Discussed changesets: 3) | HI, The relation 19410911 (building=train_station) does not from continuous outer way. In fact the existing members have no other use? would suggest that the building could be represented by a single simple way? -------- Note The tag id... commented 2025-10-31 04:16:17 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,679 |
| 173956663 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 6) | "Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected walkway and driveway nodes . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. commented 2025-10-31 04:08:24 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5 |
| 22746295 (Comments: 1) | rayquaza (Discussed changesets: 33) | Is way 286359687 really there? I could not verify with actual imagery. commented 2025-10-31 04:03:58 UTC by jeffmeyer ♦4 |
| 173655601 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 6) | "Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected walkway and driveway nodes . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you" commented 2025-10-31 04:03:11 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5 |
| 173865854 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected driveway to the main road. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-31 03:56:02 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5 |
| 173869216 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected driveway to the main road. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-31 03:50:33 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5 |
| 170907501 (Comments: 1) | doogs (Discussed changesets: 2) | motor_vehicle=designated implies that the public can drive their cars here? Is that the case here? If it's only for management, maintenance and emergency vehicles then motor_vehicle=private should be used. commented 2025-10-31 03:50:08 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 170907336 (Comments: 2) | doogs (Discussed changesets: 2) | ah sorry I see you've done that now. commented 2025-10-31 03:49:05 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 170867126 (Comments: 1) | Broadstaar (Discussed changesets: 2) | some of these still had proposed:highway=*, this should be removed if the road is already constructed now, or if construction is underway then changed to construction:highway=*. commented 2025-10-31 03:48:14 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173953520 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 6) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-31 03:43:50 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5 |
| 170559912 (Comments: 1) | martinwisata (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's best to add access=private + ownership=private. This is more than just a single parking spot for a residence, it's a few marked spots for a community centre, so while private is still useful to me mapped. Having it mapped... commented 2025-10-31 03:10:18 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173928219 (Comments: 2) | achauhan_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Changeset: 173928219 Date: 30/10/25 Task Comment from silversurfer83 about 13 hours ago Hi there :) shouldn't this be a conditional access like access:conditional=no @ delivery cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-10-31 03:01:33 UTC by achauhan_Lyft ♦2 |
| 170547524 (Comments: 1) | Stirling Land Development (Discussed changesets: 1) | Driveways are likely considered acceptable to be mapped, so they should not be deleted if already mapped by others unless they have been demolished. Others may find these useful data. They are visible to the public from the street and visible ... commented 2025-10-31 03:00:20 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173957725 (Comments: 1) | Mikewalker25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you've accidentally dragged a node that's part of a multipolygon onto Ocean Road, I've fixed this up for you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001668 --- Published using OSM... commented 2025-10-31 02:56:16 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 173297770 (Comments: 3) | deusjz (Discussed changesets: 2) | It is. Painted bike lanes that are part of the roadway are always mapped using the `cycleway=lane` tag on the road itself. Separated or protected bike lanes that run alongside a road can either be mapped as a separate `highway=cycleway` or as a `cycl... commented 2025-10-31 02:45:34 UTC by pesticides ♦29 |
| 170414006 (Comments: 3) | leonardjos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, I can see in that document it's referring both to "Chatswood North" as the name of a "Local Area Traffic Management (LATM)" which I probably wouldn't think as warranting a place=neighbourhood but also as the &quo... commented 2025-10-31 02:31:41 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
 | 173934690 (Comments: 2) | fuling09260524 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 那这种小区内部道路怎么和社会道路区分？ commented 2025-10-31 02:26:34 UTC by fuling09260524 ♦3 |
| 173976326 (Comments: 2) | @Muneebafzal (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert incorrect fixes done as part of a MapRoulette challenge https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001213 commented 2025-10-31 02:20:57 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 173976061 (Comments: 2) | @Muneebafzal (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert incorrect fixes done as part of a MapRoulette challenge https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001213 commented 2025-10-31 02:20:56 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 173975606 (Comments: 1) | @Muneebafzal (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, the parking area in this changeset needs to be drawn correctly, you've left it mis-shapen. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173975606 commented 2025-10-31 02:20:00 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 173976219 (Comments: 1) | @Muneebafzal (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, these buildings would likely still be intersecting as they are still overlapping. The Priceline probably needs to be changed to not be tagged as a standalone building, either with indoor mapping tags or by removing the building tag. ... commented 2025-10-31 02:18:00 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 173988680 (Comments: 1) | kdpy (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-31 01:52:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173991920 (Comments: 1) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 99) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270994237 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-31 01:52:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173978240 (Comments: 1) | Geometra_PL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-10-31 01:44:21 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173969675 (Comments: 1) | Luizka15154 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', &#... commented 2025-10-31 01:44:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173966308 (Comments: 1) | Mac76 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-31 01:44:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173973449 (Comments: 1) | Luizka15154 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-31 01:44:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173969286 (Comments: 1) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 125) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375548012 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-10-31 01:44:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173975612 (Comments: 6) | To The Moon Kraków (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-31 01:44:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173974500 (Comments: 2) | Kantor kryptowalut Poznań - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-31 01:44:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173969580 (Comments: 1) | Luizka15154 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place... commented 2025-10-31 01:43:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173969612 (Comments: 1) | Luizka15154 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place... commented 2025-10-31 01:43:45 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173969686 (Comments: 1) | Luizka15154 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place... commented 2025-10-31 01:43:41 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
 | 171730904 (Comments: 1) | the Sandinator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, You identifed buildings in imagery, and I can understand why you merged the nodes of these building footprints, however this tends to make them more difficult to modify later. You can hold alt to prevent the snapping of nodes. Check out... commented 2025-10-31 01:35:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
 | 174000565 (Comments: 3) | San Blas Islands (Discussed changesets: 1) | Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Servicios turísticos de las islas San Blas Panamá" --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-10-31 01:27:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173962549 (Comments: 2) | ZLima12 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hi, Even if the trail was created "illegally and in secret", it should not be removed from the map. Legality only might affect the access value. That being said, this trail is on public land, so I'm not sure that `access=private... commented 2025-10-31 00:04:47 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276 |
 | 173999208 (Comments: 2) | thanos98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hier is een voorbeeld van een opmerking op basis van je kaartbewerkingen: "Fietsbarrières toegevoegd" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added cycle barriers" commented 2025-10-30 23:56:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173922391 (Comments: 6) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 101) | Ja pamiętam, że ten odcinek był jako trunk, a powodem mają być ostre łącznice na połączeniu A4 i S19. Podnosząc do trunk, sugerowałem się S19, która omija Rzeszów od zachodu i tym samym omija się DK idące przez miasto. ... commented 2025-10-30 23:46:48 UTC by theDM ♦142 |
| 173997900 (Comments: 1) | wordbird (Discussed changesets: 9) | yay 173997900 commented 2025-10-30 22:44:39 UTC by likeToTravel ♦6 |
 | 173963861 (Comments: 1) | haritaduzenleme1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @eftal erdoğan(user id:23452030). Bazı değişiklikleriniz vandalizm amaçlı. Bir binaya(way/865847491) "İZMİR KEHANESİ VUR VUR MALA GELSİN İMANA" adını, bir yola(way/1446230182) "SHEVCENKO KAVŞAĞI" adını, bir ... commented 2025-10-30 22:20:04 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
 | 165051957 (Comments: 1) | aandreoy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Seems to be incorrect commented 2025-10-30 22:15:33 UTC by Layft Greater ♦177 |
| 173963432 (Comments: 1) | JFinnane (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, You've mixed up the tags. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227934 should be tagged as riding centre (leisure=horse_riding) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227924 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227919 sho... commented 2025-10-30 22:14:15 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦835 |
| 173997079 (Comments: 4) | BIG-HIT (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK commented 2025-10-30 22:12:31 UTC by BIG-HIT ♦1 |
| 171826150 (Comments: 1) | Elemnia (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Elemnia, bist du dir wirklich sicher, dass der keine Trampelpfad nicht mehr dort ist? Ich war das letzte Mal vor gut einem Jahr dort, und damals war er erkenn- und begehbar. Man musste allerdings hier und da schauen, wo genau er ist, da ... commented 2025-10-30 22:12:11 UTC by NGL-engel ♦106 |
| 168923535 (Comments: 1) | Gingko (Discussed changesets: 1) | sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6437112085, la station présente maintenant des emplacements supplémentaires le long du trottoir opposé (Nord), voulez-vous les représentez explicitement ? commented 2025-10-30 22:02:49 UTC by Britzz ♦241 |
| 173985219 (Comments: 12) | yticaa (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks commented 2025-10-30 21:42:15 UTC by yticaa ♦10 |
| 158082227 (Comments: 1) | slymarekivan (Discussed changesets: 35) | Zdravim, bohuzial, stale nespravne presuvate budovy. Sice pisete, ze podla Ortofoto, ktora uz je tu celkom dobra, ale nesedi to. Budova ma byt v OSM umiestnena podla podorysu, tam kde sa dotyka zeme. Nie tam kde sa premieta jej strecha podla sikmeho ... commented 2025-10-30 21:34:08 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699 |
| 168152252 (Comments: 1) | Spille00 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ahoi, auf welcher Grundlage "vor Ort" hast du diesen Weg als abandoned:highway= gesetzt? Schließlich ist er Grundlage für mehrere Wanderwege, die nur über öffentlich gewidmete Wege/Straßen laufen dürfe... commented 2025-10-30 21:17:55 UTC by DeFra85 ♦260 |
| 171594353 (Comments: 3) | Karsten Natebus (Discussed changesets: 19) | Danke dir! Ich war gestern dort und mir ist da auch kein Wegweiser aufgefallen. Interessant ist nun die Iteration#4 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2454198959/history/4 Soweit kein „historisches Interesse“ am Erhalt besteht, kö... commented 2025-10-30 21:13:13 UTC by geow ♦451 |
| 161536180 (Comments: 3) | noahdoersing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Coolio danke dir fürs fixen :) commented 2025-10-30 21:07:57 UTC by dadavid ♦510 |
 | 173995544 (Comments: 1) | OrchidA (Discussed changesets: 4) | Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary commented 2025-10-30 21:04:59 UTC by OrchidA ♦4 |
| 173908030 (Comments: 2) | DippetyDoodah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173995517 commented 2025-10-30 21:03:02 UTC by ion_chi ♦35 |
| 170090078 (Comments: 1) | Damian9S (Discussed changesets: 4) | Coś nie tak jest z nazwą. Poza tym to raczej opis, a nie nazwa własna. I czy naprawdę można to nazwać 'atrakcją turystyczną'? commented 2025-10-30 21:01:00 UTC by uprkos ♦59 |
| 173901316 (Comments: 2) | Loye Young (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is no building called Victory Commons. Rather, "Victory Commons" is the area around the garage, the American Airlines Center, and the two Victory Plazas. The entire structure marked with a P (which seems to be also labeled &quo... commented 2025-10-30 20:55:15 UTC by Loye Young ♦1 |
| 173982293 (Comments: 2) | yticaa (Discussed changesets: 10) | Pardon. Ik zal erop letten. commented 2025-10-30 20:49:46 UTC by yticaa ♦10 |
| 173992157 (Comments: 3) | Nick24_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/272-2023-%D1%80#Text commented 2025-10-30 20:47:44 UTC by Nick24_ ♦2 |
| 173986990 (Comments: 2) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | Rozumiem, że pojecie szczytu góry jest Ci obce. Tu nie ma góry, nie ma też szczytu. A w OSM nie zaznaczamy wysokości terenu poza specjalnymi przypadkami. bo do tego jest osobna mapa - poziomicowa. Nie przenosimy też bezrozumni... commented 2025-10-30 20:38:45 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,313 |
 | 173994688 (Comments: 1) | ProvenExplorer (Discussed changesets: 1) | I added the bottle return machine earlier on the edge of the supermarket. Since I saw a few times, that the bottle return machine is placed inside in other supermarkets, I wanted to make sure I did it right :) commented 2025-10-30 20:34:58 UTC by ProvenExplorer ♦1 |
 | 173162953 (Comments: 1) | Turazo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! A Sarokút ki van táblázva, vagy honnan a név? Tamás commented 2025-10-30 20:31:23 UTC by vasony ♦533 |
 | 173923071 (Comments: 1) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 49) | Fast. Ich hab eine 1 vergessen, du hast nun nebst der 1 eine extra 4 hinzugefügt ;) Irgendwann treffen wirs. commented 2025-10-30 20:28:55 UTC by datendelphin ♦332 |
| 173979074 (Comments: 2) | CoreForce (Discussed changesets: 2) | Auf dem Ortsschild steht nur Röthenbach. Dies ist die offizielle der "Gemeinde Röthenbach". Ich denke, es wäre für die Nutzer hilfreich, wenn sie von der Karte auf die Realität schliessen können. ... commented 2025-10-30 20:20:03 UTC by CoreForce ♦3 |
| 173946873 (Comments: 4) | raf57575757 (Discussed changesets: 5) | staw zginął leśniczą śmiercią tragiczną xD commented 2025-10-30 20:15:45 UTC by Yog Sot ♦327 |
| 173992083 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | It’s a pity that you are not responding to the comments here or to the private messages. commented 2025-10-30 20:15:27 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173900489 (Comments: 5) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | Mimo wszytsko pozdrawiam i życzę miłych edycji. Nie zamierzam przeglądać twoich edycji i wchodzić ci w drogę commented 2025-10-30 20:13:19 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225 |
 | 173993313 (Comments: 1) | Emerson Palhares (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dear Emerson, I've reviewed your changeset and this change to service doesn't seem to be right, can you please explain to me why you've changed it? It doesn't seem right especially because service is usually used for access ... commented 2025-10-30 20:09:44 UTC by giopera ♦6 |
| 173983206 (Comments: 2) | keesm (Discussed changesets: 7) | Mooi Dick, ik zag wel iets van een wandelrelatie op een zijstuk, maar kwam er niet helemaal uit. Zal het nog eens analyseren. Bedankt Gr Kees commented 2025-10-30 20:09:42 UTC by keesm ♦5 |
| 173993229 (Comments: 1) | roelg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Het vlak van de parkeerplaats heb ik uitgebreid. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-30 20:08:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
 | 173818613 (Comments: 7) | Kyaw Gyi 992 (Discussed changesets: 1) | A building needs to have a tag describing it is a building. There shouldn't be any tags like "are_in_me" or coordinates like in your changeset. I also noticed that the alignment of buildings is very bad - buildings overlap in... commented 2025-10-30 20:07:13 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
 | 173742757 (Comments: 1) | Nicola Delfino (Discussed changesets: 3) | Anche questo è un duplicato, lo cancello ora, saluti Martin commented 2025-10-30 20:06:54 UTC by dieterdreist ♦870 |
| 173992029 (Comments: 1) | DA026 (Discussed changesets: 14) | DA Waarom zouden hier geen brommers doorheen mogen? Ik heb die tags verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-30 20:02:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173993092 (Comments: 1) | Waldamsel (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi! Your changeset has been flagged for Outdated tags, please review the tags you've changed and check if everyone of them is correct. Best Regards, giopera --- Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2025-10-30 20:00:34 UTC by giopera ♦6 |
| 173788815 (Comments: 2) | Virgile1994 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Salut, La route est signalée par un panneau C107, ce qui se traduit habitellement par highway=trunk dans OSM. commented 2025-10-30 19:59:28 UTC by Virgile1994 ♦41 |
| 173991828 (Comments: 1) | DA026 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Dag DA Wat is je bron in deze? Sinds wanneer mogen hier auto's doorheen? https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.95952,5.846204,20/?datastrip=20250620_SVNEO-01 Graag reactie, MVG eggie commented 2025-10-30 19:58:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173992954 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM16 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi! I warn you that you have the Request Review checkbox active, this asks us to review your edits, but it seems you don't need it and I believe it's an error. Best Regards, giopera --- ... commented 2025-10-30 19:55:04 UTC by giopera ♦6 |
| 173992538 (Comments: 2) | Ezra Edwards (Discussed changesets: 7) | Just for contest it has been flagged as a possible import and I'd like to clarify if it's this the case or it's just a false positive. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2025-10-30 19:50:50 UTC by giopera ♦6 |
| 173943117 (Comments: 4) | Manuel H (Discussed changesets: 20) | Danke. 1. nach Luftbild korrigiert 2. nach Regionalstadtplan Kassel eingepflegt und fixme mit Bitte um Kontrolle 3. fixme mit Bitte um Kontrolle commented 2025-10-30 19:50:32 UTC by Manuel H ♦55 |
| 173942427 (Comments: 3) | oo-O-oo (Discussed changesets: 2) | If mistakes are obvious, I am happy to correct them. But your expectations are rather questionable! Of course, I can also delete such things as copy & paste errors if you don't want to be bothered with your mistakes. commented 2025-10-30 19:38:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
 | 173975645 (Comments: 2) | mechka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Благодаря за коментара! Сега разбирам какво да направя и ще променя таговете, вместо да изтривам точката. commented 2025-10-30 19:38:15 UTC by mechka ♦1 |
| 173650345 (Comments: 2) | Jons Icoli (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Will do when it's night time. IIRC there's some lamps there that don't put out enough light to see obstacles or dangers. I haven't been able to do the whole region yet tho commented 2025-10-30 19:37:09 UTC by Jons Icoli ♦2 |
 | 173991856 (Comments: 1) | علي طهراوي (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Sorry for the contact but I've noticed that you're adding large areas of water on what appears to be a small river, can you explain to me the idea behind it and why you're adding such large areas? Also note that roads can... commented 2025-10-30 19:34:38 UTC by giopera ♦6 |
 | 173908097 (Comments: 1) | Iris 314 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1445898980. What is the mean of the tag "Plaza con sombra y juegos, pública- (CEMENTERIO VIEJO)" = "Malvinas Argentinas"? Did you overpaint a existing leisure=p... commented 2025-10-30 19:30:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
 | 149331125 (Comments: 2) | Apirnus (Discussed changesets: 27) | Seal küll foore pole commented 2025-10-30 19:29:16 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦17 |
| 140095659 (Comments: 3) | SafetyIng (Discussed changesets: 28) | Das ist leider so nicht richtig...beachte den Abschnitt Ortschaften und die daraus resultierenden Grenzen, welche hier gemappt sind...auch wenn im ersten Abschnitt von Ortsteil gesprochen wird, ist dieser dennoch Teil der Ortschaft Paplitz...eine Bes... commented 2025-10-30 19:27:49 UTC by bwbuz ♦51 |
| 173942114 (Comments: 1) | sskwarek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Witaj. Pokazuję ci znacznie lepszą praktykę mapowania. Która zachowuje w pełni historię obiektów już nie istniejących. demolished:building = Yes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446362194. Nawet gdy w miejscu dawnej wieży zo... commented 2025-10-30 19:26:25 UTC by km2bp ♦287 |
| 173643154 (Comments: 1) | Gino-52 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Guten Abend! Ich nerve schon wieder mit meinen dummern Fragen... Wenn die Friedrich-Ebert-Straße in Langendiebach jetzt eine Einbahnstraße ist, dann muß sich der Weg von MKK-39 geändert haben. Kannst Du da mal nachfors... commented 2025-10-30 19:24:21 UTC by Senihtu ♦100 |
 | 173951519 (Comments: 2) | kabelhaai (Discussed changesets: 25) | ok, aangepast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446155491 commented 2025-10-30 19:22:39 UTC by kabelhaai ♦55 |
 | 173977044 (Comments: 1) | dododont (Discussed changesets: 8) | Moi, Mielenkiintoinen kyltti maanomistajalta. Moottoriajoneuvoilla ajo maastossa on nyt on lähtökohtaisesti kielletty ilman kylttiäkin, joten tämä varmaan koskee lähinnä pyöräilyä. Py&ou... commented 2025-10-30 19:21:02 UTC by Sakari_N ♦85 |
| 173987164 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | Przecież w JOSMIe wzgórze i szczyt mają ten sam preset, ten sam tag. Teraz żadne wzgórze się nie będzie renderować. Powiedz mi, dla kogo są mapy? Dla ludzi, którzy chcą ich używać w celach turystycznych, rekreacyjnych i... commented 2025-10-30 19:09:26 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225 |
| 173991618 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 91) | If there is, in fact, a sign indicating its name, I couldn't find it, and it's definitely not along the main highway. Is it buried on some random intersection hidden from Street View? commented 2025-10-30 19:06:34 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦118 |
| 173990711 (Comments: 1) | mapyr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wellicht green? Loop je edits nog even af svp. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-30 19:05:33 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173618046 (Comments: 2) | Püppi68 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, ich möchte noch einmal an die Überarbeitung erinnern. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-30 19:05:24 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173659700 (Comments: 2) | azerim (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo, ich möchte noch einmal an die Überarbeitung erinnern. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-30 19:04:50 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173990803 (Comments: 1) | mapyr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tip colour=Groen is geen valide tag. De taal is UK English green? MVG eggie commented 2025-10-30 19:04:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173990071 (Comments: 1) | mapyr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Lijkt me oke. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-30 19:02:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173989763 (Comments: 1) | Gopher22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Probeer als het kan bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. M... commented 2025-10-30 18:59:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173976291 (Comments: 3) | eleguaia (Discussed changesets: 1) | No, i dati di Openstreetmap non sono collegati a Google e a Facebook/Instagram commented 2025-10-30 18:56:14 UTC by fayor ♦126 |
| 173962992 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Wald (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, auch hier noch einmal der Hinweis auf den korrekten Umgang mit emergency=water_tank. Am Beispiel www.openstreetmap.org/node/13269755116: Das sieht für mich wie ein Teich aus. Dann ist das Tagging aber falsch. Worum handelt es... commented 2025-10-30 18:53:05 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173644610 (Comments: 1) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 37) | lmfao imagine commented 2025-10-30 18:47:52 UTC by naUrnaTc ♦1 |
| 161863939 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 18:47:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173947412 (Comments: 1) | Horus9999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, die Adressen 7a und 7b unterscheiden sich im Grundsatz nicht. Die Nr. 7b wurde aber erst am 12.08. korrigiert. Mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit verwendet der Anbieter diese Daten noch nicht. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-30 18:45:04 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173973237 (Comments: 1) | Guardian Protection (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.... commented 2025-10-30 18:40:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 172614237 (Comments: 2) | Javierpf (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hola VL, gracias por comentar. Generalmente suelo dibujar los cambios cuando están confirmados. Esta obra la están arrancando y no sabemos cuándo estará completada. Cuando eso pase, o esté cerca, ahí yo suelo... commented 2025-10-30 18:40:38 UTC by Javierpf ♦107 |
| 173985027 (Comments: 3) | Dmitriy19801980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Отлично! Я пока удалил natural=coastline. Вкратце, он предназначен для материк - море/океан. commented 2025-10-30 18:39:59 UTC by vng_me ♦129 |
| 173978619 (Comments: 2) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 213) | Faktycznie, nie wiem jak mogłem się tak pomylić. Wycofane https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173990201 commented 2025-10-30 18:27:01 UTC by kubahahaha ♦403 |
| 162949032 (Comments: 1) | Lulu-Ann (Discussed changesets: 11) | Das war eher für den Ortsname gemeint, nicht für einen Adresspunkt? Ich korrigiere das jetzt. commented 2025-10-30 18:24:31 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦402 |
| 173982642 (Comments: 2) | yticaa (Discussed changesets: 10) | access=no betekent gewoon Verboden Toegang voor iedereen.... Ik heb die tag verwijderd commented 2025-10-30 18:19:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173989123 (Comments: 1) | SarahAr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.o... commented 2025-10-30 18:14:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173969166 (Comments: 1) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 150) | Was meinst du mit maxspeed=none und maxpeed:type=sign? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173969166 commented 2025-10-30 18:13:59 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413 |
 | 173984090 (Comments: 3) | Clitheroe Warrior (Discussed changesets: 7) | No problem, I've already fixed. commented 2025-10-30 18:05:32 UTC by vng_me ♦129 |
 | 161906919 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 18:05:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173920673 (Comments: 3) | Der_Fab (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, das hast du dir ein schwieriges Thema gesucht. Ich hatte schon nach Mapillary-Bildern geschaut, war dort aber nicht erfolgreich. Nur ein paar ergänzende Hinweise: - M.E. benötigt auch der mini_roundabout eine Beschild... commented 2025-10-30 18:02:23 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 170877455 (Comments: 2) | _Mathieu_ (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hello urk, I'd say this tag combination is used when a traffic sign explicitely bans cycling on a particular path (which was the case there iirc). commented 2025-10-30 17:59:23 UTC by _Mathieu_ ♦44 |
| 173920381 (Comments: 2) | fredlenoir (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, it s a mistake (tracktype : grade2). I ve changer the tag. commented 2025-10-30 17:57:21 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15 |
| 173988198 (Comments: 2) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 157) | The official name of this stop is "Alma". This is the correct spelling, and this is how it should be written on OSM. You changed the name of the stop and changed it into "STIB / MVIB - Alma", which is a strange mix of th... commented 2025-10-30 17:53:51 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 99354832 (Comments: 3) | reedyn (Discussed changesets: 5) | Well, I'll double check my photos from the walk and will probably move the stream more or less parallel south from thw way. commented 2025-10-30 17:52:34 UTC by urk ♦20 |
| 162127341 (Comments: 2) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 144) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18650770 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18650771 sono divieti completamente inesistenti, si tratta di manovre consentite da segnaletica verticale e orizzontale commented 2025-10-30 17:49:38 UTC by totera ♦305 |
| 173972976 (Comments: 2) | Dacha2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Официальное название "улица Фрунзе". Как будет на украинском языке я не знаю, поэтому оставил как было. commented 2025-10-30 17:49:37 UTC by Dacha2 ♦1 |
| 173988608 (Comments: 2) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 18) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4724908 commented 2025-10-30 17:43:24 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦24 |
| 173980218 (Comments: 1) | The Golf Club CNX (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-30 17:35:19 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 148039178 (Comments: 1) | Pooh01 (Discussed changesets: 23) | ta trasa równoległa do S19 dalej jest w planach czy pomysł zarzucono? commented 2025-10-30 17:33:19 UTC by theDM ♦142 |
| 173987308 (Comments: 1) | Sim100v (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please do not change the name of metro stations! Your edit has been reverted. commented 2025-10-30 17:32:19 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 173978283 (Comments: 1) | Kantor kryptowalut Bielsko Biała - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags. Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it. Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist). Please change the name t... commented 2025-10-30 17:31:34 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 173972598 (Comments: 1) | Kantor kryptowalut Katowice - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags. Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it. Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist). Please change the name t... commented 2025-10-30 17:31:11 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 173982798 (Comments: 1) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 300) | Hi, In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags. Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it. Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist). Please change the name t... commented 2025-10-30 17:30:55 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 173972394 (Comments: 1) | Kantor kryptowalut Łódź - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags. Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it. Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist). Please change the name t... commented 2025-10-30 17:30:16 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 139123898 (Comments: 1) | Nordsee-Zeitung GmbH (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo "Nordsee-Zeitung GmbH", dieser Fußweg auf dem Gartenweg existiert nicht, nur der private Teil hinter der Hecke. Magst du das ändern? commented 2025-10-30 17:26:14 UTC by urk ♦20 |
| 173987731 (Comments: 2) | Inscope Property Inspections (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Property inspection service in Melbourne" commented 2025-10-30 17:24:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
 | 173973581 (Comments: 6) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 890) | Ed_slv, "What about if I use as source "personal knowledge" ?" Um dos princípios do OSM é a verificabilidade da informação. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability Algo como &... commented 2025-10-30 17:17:26 UTC by JoaoPaixao ♦15 |
| 173987155 (Comments: 2) | AlxTheMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings, including schools, fences, walls, a leisure pitch, and cricket nets" commented 2025-10-30 17:16:56 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 134837986 (Comments: 8) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 551) | Sorry yeah this my original mapping. I agree it's not ideal. I think I would resort to that tag just if I can't decide on a more specific category, and the stuff they sell is all overpriced luxury nonsense. Some of these prob... commented 2025-10-30 17:16:42 UTC by Harry Wood ♦102 |
| 163544959 (Comments: 3) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 158) | Jemu chyba chodziło z tym zniszczeniem, że te tory nie łączą z czynnymi torami i rosną między nimi drzewa. W wielu miejscach we Wrocławiu są takie pozostawione stare tory i nikt ich nie demontuje (ani co dziwne nie kradnie). Te nadal s... commented 2025-10-30 17:14:17 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,313 |
| 173405683 (Comments: 6) | fmc_3 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ich hab den mal so verlegt, wie ich es machen würde... Dann auch aus Sichweise als Radfahrer... Da ist eine Verkehrsinsel, wenn ich da mit dem Rad langfahren würde, würde ich stets über die Verkehrsinsel fahren, egal, ob ich in Ri... commented 2025-10-30 17:09:34 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,090 |
| 173735746 (Comments: 1) | Spencer_MHD (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, thanks for this changeset! The only thing is that the change from grassland to farmland near the southshore may be what the aerial photos show, but I don't think it's current use. The area is currently an empty field and planned for fu... commented 2025-10-30 17:07:37 UTC by HoubkneghteS ♦2 |
| 172059593 (Comments: 1) | NVBW_Edit_Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! In this changeset you added the tag landing=0.14 to way 303780041. Did you perhaps mean landing=yes or another value? Cheers commented 2025-10-30 17:06:53 UTC by spughetti ♦116 |
| 173496751 (Comments: 1) | Fabianbuecheler (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hallo Fabian, Layer ist für die Ebenen, wenn mehrere OSM-Dinge übereinander gezeichnet sind. Damit ist nicht Stockwerke gemeint. Das gehört in Stockwerke (building:levels). Ich habe noch ein paar Sachen zusätzlich ei... commented 2025-10-30 17:06:16 UTC by Metzor ♦388 |
| 173977894 (Comments: 2) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 14) | I was doing some cleanup and added some abandoned rail using usgs 3d elevation program data and compared it to esri data. commented 2025-10-30 17:03:44 UTC by Isopycnic ♦8 |
| 168254609 (Comments: 1) | nikdavid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Phil from the Data Working Group here. We have received from some mappers who are concerned by the use of the Nerf Map Editor. For the avoidance of doubt an editor which providing links to disallowed sources, in this case streetview, i... commented 2025-10-30 16:59:26 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,402 |
 | 162236275 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 16:58:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173931725 (Comments: 2) | Gertjan Idema (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dank je. Op zich niet nieuw. Voor zo'n 1000 routes in Nederland stond de kleur er al in. Nu met 1000 extra aangevuld en voor 215 routes gecorrigeerd. Bij de overige routes staat er nog geen kleur in de bron data. commented 2025-10-30 16:57:36 UTC by Gertjan Idema ♦18 |
| 162236693 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 16:55:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173971929 (Comments: 2) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 263) | Plac budowy nie był wyrysowany tymczasowo. Przywróciłem. commented 2025-10-30 16:53:40 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,313 |
| 170477723 (Comments: 5) | mapitero (Discussed changesets: 7) | Well, Matheus, the video undoubtable shows the construction work going on (with 2 men working and 20 watching ;-) ) until 5 km ahead of Acopiara (which is not even proofed by GPS data). No rails yet and even when there is rails ontop the subgrade, th... commented 2025-10-30 16:53:01 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦38 |
| 173873864 (Comments: 1) | Voirie_3M (Discussed changesets: 12) | y'a pas une incohérence avec le débouché de l'avenue sur la rue Mirzakhani ? commented 2025-10-30 16:52:00 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦115 |
| 173979234 (Comments: 1) | LakeTana (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://prensa.cba.gov.ar/gobernador/llaryora-habilito-el-segundo-tramo-de-la-duplicacion-de-la-avenida-padre-luchesse/ commented 2025-10-30 16:48:37 UTC by vicente lopez 2021 ♦36 |
| 173969042 (Comments: 3) | 9ix (Discussed changesets: 23) | Alles klar. Kann ich nachvollziehen. commented 2025-10-30 16:48:05 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 162237032 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 16:46:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162237511 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 16:45:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173932354 (Comments: 1) | karc Egyesulet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tisztelt szerkesztő! Kérem, hogy amennyiben épületeket kíván felrajzolni, akkor a rétegek közül válassza a FÖMI felvételeket, mert az alapértelmezett Bing műhold felv&ea... commented 2025-10-30 16:42:22 UTC by Spush ♦41 |
| 162253757 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 16:41:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162256524 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 16:40:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162257059 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 16:40:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173946958 (Comments: 1) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 125) | Dzięki :D commented 2025-10-30 16:39:35 UTC by Szymson ♦421 |
| 162257303 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 16:38:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
 | 173985132 (Comments: 1) | Amin cafenet (Discussed changesets: 1) | سرویس دهی همه ی خدمات در کمترین زمان ممکن commented 2025-10-30 16:27:26 UTC by Amin cafenet ♦1 |
| 173985115 (Comments: 1) | Helmchen42 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hydrogeography in north WY, US commented 2025-10-30 16:26:21 UTC by Helmchen42 ♦24 |
| 173961818 (Comments: 1) | Glanz Digital Marketing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Has the Victoria branch of Vagabond Wines at this location really closed and been replaced by your office? commented 2025-10-30 16:25:23 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645 |
| 173947946 (Comments: 3) | jodjod (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the info! I changed bicyle and foot to no on the bridge. commented 2025-10-30 16:23:50 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦619 |
| 173977694 (Comments: 1) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2025-10-30 16:23:23 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173979076 (Comments: 1) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2025-10-30 16:22:23 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173982054 (Comments: 1) | skumarchandela_lyft (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice. --- ... commented 2025-10-30 16:20:43 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173981416 (Comments: 1) | Happy Dachshund (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946 commented 2025-10-30 16:19:30 UTC by Negreheb ♦296 |
| 173979123 (Comments: 1) | Happy Dachshund (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946 commented 2025-10-30 16:19:28 UTC by Negreheb ♦296 |
| 173979785 (Comments: 1) | Happy Dachshund (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946 commented 2025-10-30 16:19:27 UTC by Negreheb ♦296 |
| 173979714 (Comments: 1) | rkothiyal_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice. --- ... commented 2025-10-30 16:18:44 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 168401714 (Comments: 2) | Duck_Dur (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello VictorIE, No, this was apart of the old mill complex due for redevelopment. As you previously said, this was all demolished in 2023-25. There are bits of it still around and actively occupied like the Charity Shop and a car mechanics and... commented 2025-10-30 16:15:35 UTC by Duck_Dur ♦2 |
| 173981273 (Comments: 1) | Gemirt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Gemirt. Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Gebruik svp de adresnode om op bij te taggen. Geen spaties in postcode. Ik pas even wat aan. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-30 16:15:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173982537 (Comments: 1) | GamenHaaDee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-30 16:12:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173981362 (Comments: 1) | JHW1981 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-30 16:11:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
 | 173932774 (Comments: 4) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 77) | לא יודע, או שזה שביל או שלא. אם אתה לא רוצה שביל אז תשאיר ככה. commented 2025-10-30 15:58:11 UTC by hatul ♦410 |
| 172757727 (Comments: 3) | dmfr (Discussed changesets: 21) | Excelente proposta commented 2025-10-30 15:50:05 UTC by Ed_slv ♦4 |
| 172773729 (Comments: 3) | Nzau (Discussed changesets: 73) | Je viens de voir que highway=living_street est déjà correctement appliqué. commented 2025-10-30 15:44:48 UTC by Nzau ♦143 |
 | 173976824 (Comments: 2) | marktechratp (Discussed changesets: 8) | ça peut apparaître bizarre, mais réellement c'est exactement ce qu'il y a pour l'instant, en attendant ce qu'ils vont rajouter commented 2025-10-30 15:36:28 UTC by marktechratp ♦3 |
| 173935765 (Comments: 3) | wandelzot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Top! commented 2025-10-30 15:35:36 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦416 |
| 169473158 (Comments: 4) | Nzau (Discussed changesets: 73) | Salut Charles, Merci pour ton retour ! C'est assez drôle de voir qu'il n'y a qu'en Bretagne que j'ai eu des soucis avec ce type de modifications x) Sinon oui je suis tout à fait d'accord pour p... commented 2025-10-30 15:35:32 UTC by Nzau ♦143 |
| 173978514 (Comments: 1) | Grace Humphreys (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding the restaurant. Has this replaced "Slurp", previously mapped at 17 Frith Street? commented 2025-10-30 15:34:45 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645 |
| 173549182 (Comments: 2) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 263) | Trzeba dać access=no zatem. Bo niby jest gotowa i niektórzy już korzystali ale widzę że oficjalnie nie można commented 2025-10-30 15:34:14 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225 |
| 173784064 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173971929 commented 2025-10-30 15:33:02 UTC by maro21 ♦746 |
| 173962304 (Comments: 1) | Szymiii (Discussed changesets: 13) | Czemu usunąłeś kolory dachów? commented 2025-10-30 15:30:42 UTC by maro21 ♦746 |
| 173885310 (Comments: 1) | Szymiii (Discussed changesets: 13) | - Budynek jest w trakcie budowy i nie ma 7 kondygnacji - dlaczego go ponownie dodałeś? Dlaczego dodałeś budynek jako wybudowany, skoro wybudowany nie jest? - Gdzie można zweryfikować te dane? Przejrzałem podane strony i nie widzę gdzie... commented 2025-10-30 15:29:36 UTC by maro21 ♦746 |
| 173757303 (Comments: 3) | Szymiii (Discussed changesets: 13) | ad 3: Dodanie budynku w budowie jest ok, ale dodanie że ma 7 kondygnacji, kiedy tylu nie ma, nie jest ok. ad 5: Na OSM nie mapujemy przyszłości, tylko stan zastany. Plany mogą się zmienić, lub nigdy nie urzeczywistnić. Np. ten budynek też ... commented 2025-10-30 15:26:23 UTC by maro21 ♦746 |
| 170527896 (Comments: 1) | Damian05 (Discussed changesets: 48) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-30 15:22:29 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 171596369 (Comments: 1) | Damian05 (Discussed changesets: 48) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-30 15:22:15 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 164785052 (Comments: 2) | Nzau (Discussed changesets: 73) | Bonjour josmougn, Est-ce qu'il y a encore des vestiges de ses rails ? Si ce n'est pas le cas, alors railway=abandoned n'est pas adapté : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:railway%3Dabandoned Et s'il reste... commented 2025-10-30 15:21:40 UTC by Nzau ♦143 |
| 173851164 (Comments: 1) | mich345 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ten zestaw zmian ze zmianą nazewnictwa nie ma nic wspólnego - stosuj się, proszę, do zasad opisanych tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-30 15:20:19 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173462822 (Comments: 1) | mich345 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-30 15:18:42 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
 | 173491503 (Comments: 1) | Ockmonek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I see that you noted Nafplia Hotel as disused. That's incorrect, the hotel still operates. commented 2025-10-30 15:18:32 UTC by jimkats ♦75 |
| 173851770 (Comments: 1) | mich345 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-30 15:18:30 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173980253 (Comments: 1) | mich345 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-30 15:18:22 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173980468 (Comments: 1) | mich345 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-30 15:18:16 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173963409 (Comments: 3) | djsa (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bedankt, nu staan we gelijk = we zijn alle twee verkeerd. Ik heb me laten misleiden door de note. Of interpreteer ik het gebouw verkeerd ? commented 2025-10-30 15:11:42 UTC by philippec ♦746 |
| 173619225 (Comments: 3) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 99) | Bonjour, PTNA est mon outil préféré de suivi de réseau: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/BRE/FR-BRE-TUB-Analysis.html Après des modifs, on peut demander une nouvelle analyse avec résultat da... commented 2025-10-30 15:03:12 UTC by mga_geo ♦267 |
| 173979152 (Comments: 1) | yticaa (Discussed changesets: 10) | Algemeen access:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise) Wanneer het alleen voor wandelaars geldt dan foot:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise) MVG eggie commented 2025-10-30 14:53:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
 | 172817259 (Comments: 1) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Why did you delete wikidata items? this information is very useful in my humble opinion. commented 2025-10-30 14:50:39 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394 |
| 167762520 (Comments: 2) | Frogs Magoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also displaying the speed limit from other sources is not allowed in an OSM editor. commented 2025-10-30 14:44:50 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,402 |
| 173974974 (Comments: 1) | dekwak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wanneer wegen en woningen zijn opgeleverd zou ook de landuse construction kunnen worden aangepast commented 2025-10-30 14:39:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173974916 (Comments: 1) | dekwak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback In editor iD kun je ook een BGT achtergrond gebruiken. Dan kun je de wegen en parkeerplaatsen precies uitlijnen... commented 2025-10-30 14:24:41 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173736329 (Comments: 1) | Lauragzf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, if you're using more specific tags than building=yes then please clearly state the source of that information. It is at times possible to spot e.g. some religious buildings from aerial imagery becasue they are visually distinct, but how d... commented 2025-10-30 14:20:54 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173723092 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 25) | Ciao BiboORM, non sono riuscito a vedere sul terreno tracce di questa ferrovia. Mi confermi che da qualche parte è possibile rilevarla? commented 2025-10-30 14:19:42 UTC by fb552 ♦18 |
 | 173532207 (Comments: 3) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 27) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173978950 commented 2025-10-30 14:17:52 UTC by empty_child ♦357 |
| 173958963 (Comments: 2) | lukajankowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dzień dobry, w imieniu społeczności OpenStreetMap dziękuję za Pana wkład w rozwój mapy. Chciałbym jednak zwrócić uwagę na sposób dodawania numerów telefonów. Wprowadzane numery nie zawierają numeru k... commented 2025-10-30 14:05:46 UTC by Michaall99 ♦51 |
| 173902031 (Comments: 1) | kacper112 (Discussed changesets: 21) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5029855 commented 2025-10-30 14:03:31 UTC by kubahahaha ♦403 |
 | 173977496 (Comments: 3) | nganhangmbbankcomvn (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173978221 where the changeset comment is: Remove spam commented 2025-10-30 14:00:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173960232 (Comments: 1) | superiorplum (Discussed changesets: 1) | This POI contains ad copy, which is inappropriate in OSM. This POI is also in the middle of an intersection, not a place of business. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173977743 commented 2025-10-30 13:49:34 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173900904 (Comments: 2) | Endres Pelka (Discussed changesets: 54) | Zgodnie z poradnikiem: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487 Nie należy dodawać sloganów reklamowych i opisów marketingowych w nazwie i opisie, słów kluczowych po... commented 2025-10-30 13:48:33 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267 |
| 173900576 (Comments: 2) | :-} (Discussed changesets: 186) | Co "Ciupagi"? Ponawiam prośbę, być dodawał źródło zmian dla rzeczy, które nie są kalkowaniem zdjęć z ortofotomap. Widzę, że dokonywałeś poprzednich aktualizacji tych dróg, więc dobrze wiedzieć, że są on... commented 2025-10-30 13:38:17 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267 |
| 173361566 (Comments: 2) | CouscousPie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello CouscousPie, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contibution. OpenStreetMap is not a map but a geodatabase from which countless maps and applications are created. The respective map creator decides whether and how something is displayed. C... commented 2025-10-30 13:37:52 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,354 |
| 173920107 (Comments: 1) | PEAL1993 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Pearl, du halst die Zufahrt zum Industriegebiet gelöscht.. Gibt es da keine Verbindung mehr? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173920107 commented 2025-10-30 13:37:50 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413 |
| 169243141 (Comments: 4) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Myslím, že to nie je oficiálny názov. Ako plochu som to nedal preto, lebo som si nebol istý geometriou, kľudne môžeš upraviť, tak ako myslíš, že by to malo byť správne. commented 2025-10-30 13:34:17 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦35 |
 | 173966362 (Comments: 3) | Aldirinaldy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also: Please also write a meaningful comment, what you did exactly. Also where you got the information from. Is this your home town or have you visited this place, etc.. commented 2025-10-30 13:29:18 UTC by MaestroGlanz ♦37 |
| 173976349 (Comments: 3) | Kantor kryptowalut Bielsko Biała - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Kantor kryptowalut w Bielsku-Białej" --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-10-30 13:27:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 159366306 (Comments: 1) | MaxR_6429 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Bonjour, Je ne vois aucun chantier sur les imageries Sentinelle les récentes. Es-tu sur que le chantier a démarré et que ce n'est pas au stade de projet ? Aurélien commented 2025-10-30 13:20:21 UTC by AurélienQ ♦140 |
| 173975416 (Comments: 1) | waflR_zero (Discussed changesets: 6) | Changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173906547 commented 2025-10-30 13:09:14 UTC by waflR_zero ♦7 |
| 173975082 (Comments: 1) | waflR_zero (Discussed changesets: 6) | Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919 commented 2025-10-30 13:08:36 UTC by waflR_zero ♦7 |
 | 173495223 (Comments: 2) | Weathering (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street commented 2025-10-30 13:08:06 UTC by rhtb0 ♦254 |
 | 173973160 (Comments: 1) | Torey360 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Saludos. Cual es el Soporte Legal para denominar este segmento de via como F50? las vias F son parte de la Red Vial Fundamental de Bolivia (RVF) y tienen que tener una LEY NACIONAL donde se las incluya, para su administracion por parte de la ABC. ... commented 2025-10-30 13:07:52 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,210 |
| 173959441 (Comments: 9) | ufoncz (Discussed changesets: 2) | It's displayable on OSM, that's enough. I feel I can remove the data I entered. I'm not trying to prevent anyone else from putting the trails on the map, though. There's a big chance it'll be more accurate than mine anyway. commented 2025-10-30 13:07:43 UTC by ufoncz ♦2 |
| 173971565 (Comments: 4) | zmeuk (Discussed changesets: 7) | Droga jest zamknęta na 3.5 miesęca. Sprawdzę jak tam prowidlowo zrobić z tymi tegami commented 2025-10-30 13:06:22 UTC by zmeuk ♦4 |
| 166939587 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | This appears to be an incomplete polygon for the Town Plaza mall, not just the doggy daycare. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166939587 commented 2025-10-30 13:05:05 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173974657 (Comments: 2) | Jack Kok (Discussed changesets: 1) | 這裡有一個基於你地圖編輯的示例評論：“添加咖啡店，甜點屬性” (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added coffee shop, dessert attributes" commented 2025-10-30 12:56:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
 | 172929121 (Comments: 3) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 23) | Saludos, Una disculpa por la tardanza en la respuesta, gracias por tu comentario, estamos haciendo una prueba para poder calsificar las vias de acuerdo a como el gobierno colombiano las tienes, estas etiquetas son los puntos que manejan las concecion... commented 2025-10-30 12:42:31 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦19 |
| 173974160 (Comments: 1) | waflR_zero (Discussed changesets: 6) | Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919 commented 2025-10-30 12:37:43 UTC by waflR_zero ♦7 |
| 173973952 (Comments: 1) | waflR_zero (Discussed changesets: 6) | Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919 commented 2025-10-30 12:37:22 UTC by waflR_zero ♦7 |
| 173937518 (Comments: 1) | Emil1887 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo Emil, hat sich hier die Parksituation von Parallelparken zu Diagonal-/Schrägparken verändert? Auf den 2024 und 2025er Luftbildern kann ich nur Parallelparker erkennen. Du hast ja als Quelle Survey angegeben. Kann ja sein, dass ... commented 2025-10-30 12:34:00 UTC by fmc_3 ♦7 |
| 173972798 (Comments: 1) | kacper112 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Powiedzmy, że wyszła ci ta relacja zbiornika wodnego ale tereny zielone wewnątrz są jakieś ... utopione na mapie. Prawdopodobnie brakło https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place=islet?uselang=pl ale warto też poczytać o wyspie. ... commented 2025-10-30 12:33:05 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦551 |
| 173950664 (Comments: 3) | kabelhaai (Discussed changesets: 25) | Op die pilaar is duidelijk niets, toch niets op de plaats van de vroegere foto. In dit geval heb ik er geen bezwaar tegen het toch te mappen met een fixme en een note. Er zijn voldoende aanwijzingen dat er een AED is, en waarschijnlijk buiten. |
| 173570817 (Comments: 4) | Lidon Group (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok thanks this is all new to me, appreciate the feedback. commented 2025-10-30 12:23:27 UTC by Lidon Group ♦1 |
| 173973295 (Comments: 1) | Broadstaar (Discussed changesets: 2) | added 34 houses commented 2025-10-30 12:17:29 UTC by Broadstaar ♦1 |
| 173172954 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 9) | Нужно соединить этот кусочек с тропой, которая идет под ЛЭП. commented 2025-10-30 12:09:25 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8 |
| 139821867 (Comments: 1) | SafetyIng (Discussed changesets: 28) | Danke für überflüssige Verschlimmbesserungen - siehe osm.org/note/4565356 commented 2025-10-30 12:09:05 UTC by bwbuz ♦51 |
| 173972052 (Comments: 3) | Kantor kryptowalut Łódź - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Kantor kryptowalut w Katowicach" --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-10-30 11:48:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173333731 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 9) | Не существует на местности. Требуется удалить добавленный путь. commented 2025-10-30 11:43:41 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8 |
| 173334682 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 9) | В ченжсете отображена несуществующая дорога. Нужно удалить с карты то, чего нет на местности. commented 2025-10-30 11:42:35 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8 |
| 173334823 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 9) | В ченжсете отображены не существующие пути. Их нужно удалить. commented 2025-10-30 11:41:18 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8 |
| 173335030 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 9) | Многие участки ченжесета не существуют на местности. Их необходимо удалить. commented 2025-10-30 11:39:50 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8 |
| 173757268 (Comments: 1) | Kris74M (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2eBa. What is the mean of the tag "ref MZK Krotoszyn" = 272? Did you mean ref:MZK? What is the difference between "ref MZK Krotoszyn" and "ref MZK Ostrów Wlkp.&q... commented 2025-10-30 11:34:33 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173971466 (Comments: 2) | modsagency (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Digital agency in Minnesota" commented 2025-10-30 11:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173901253 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | ele zostało dokładnie wymierzone na podstawie rzeźby terenu a także profesjonalnych map topograficznych dostępnych na stronie Generalnej Dyrekcji Ochrony Środowiska. Twoje zmiany to czysty wandalizm commented 2025-10-30 11:33:39 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225 |
| 173821177 (Comments: 1) | Ediats (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Ediats, Someone has deleted the things that you added here because they say that they did not exist. They did that before, after they asked you about it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163509587 , but you did not reply. Best... commented 2025-10-30 11:32:31 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 173669161 (Comments: 4) | bhartinegi_lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for clarification. commented 2025-10-30 11:32:01 UTC by bhartinegi_lyft ♦1 |
| 173902098 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | Świetnie się bawisz? Usuwając pracę innego użytkownika? Powiedz mi, ile map przejrzałeś z tej okolicy, że postanowiłeś sobie usunąć istniejącą przełęcz? Mam dosyć twoich uwag, komentarzy i zmian robionych na złość i szkodę mapuj... commented 2025-10-30 11:31:48 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225 |
| 173971386 (Comments: 1) | JeLeB (Discussed changesets: 1) | la pizzaria a demenage, il y a une autre restauration qui va s'ouvrir commented 2025-10-30 11:31:12 UTC by JeLeB ♦1 |
| 173971299 (Comments: 2) | Natasha Denona (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Natasha Denona store" commented 2025-10-30 11:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173971178 (Comments: 2) | grzegorz75jan (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://postimg.cc/gallery/dZXczzJ commented 2025-10-30 11:30:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦551 |
| 173042455 (Comments: 4) | 0svald (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh, that's cool trivia! Good luck! Noteworthy is that when adding separate parking spaces, iD editor raises errors regarding tags on adjacent ways. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=4779348#map=19/59.404757/24.724208 commented 2025-10-30 11:29:09 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦17 |
| 173763690 (Comments: 2) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 9) | Михаил Колодий, зачем вы вносите в OSM несуществующие на местности объекты? проект не предназначен для хранения исторической информа... commented 2025-10-30 11:26:47 UTC by literan ♦6,844 |
| 173872264 (Comments: 2) | NGlf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, nice catch. I copied the value 'Παραλία Κατερίνης' (the city tag) and i pasted this on JOSM in a haste as a tag with value. commented 2025-10-30 11:20:15 UTC by NGlf ♦11 |
| 173332152 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 9) | Многих добавленных троп не существует на местности. Нельзя добавлять несуществующие тропы. commented 2025-10-30 11:03:35 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8 |
| 173969856 (Comments: 2) | diamondscapewny (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Landscape and design company in Lockport" commented 2025-10-30 11:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173964443 (Comments: 1) | chr0me (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hei, Poistit aika monta rakennusta, kadottaen tietoja ja muokkaushistoriaa, ilmeisesti vain muuttaaksesi niiden muotoa huonompaan suuntaan. Samoin asuinalueen polygoni ulottuu nyt Matkailijasillan yli, joka on julkista aluetta. Tämä ... commented 2025-10-30 10:54:45 UTC by thautal ♦43 |
 | 173938439 (Comments: 11) | Tomas Straupis (Discussed changesets: 79) | Pulko ir Ulonų yra net visai iš kitos lygos, tai yra net valstybinius numerius turintys keliai (kas reiškia ir atitinkamą jų priežiūrą bei kokybės standartus), tai jų buvimas „aukštojoje lygoje“ net nediskutuo... commented 2025-10-30 10:50:05 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,990 |
 | 173700358 (Comments: 1) | salmSALM (Discussed changesets: 9) | نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة commented 2025-10-30 10:49:38 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦718 |
| 173185503 (Comments: 1) | salmSALM (Discussed changesets: 9) | نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة commented 2025-10-30 10:49:35 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦718 |
| 172896460 (Comments: 1) | salmSALM (Discussed changesets: 9) | نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة commented 2025-10-30 10:49:29 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦718 |
 | 173969220 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 217) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 5029138 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:45\tclosed\tok 5029139 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:45\tclosed\tok 5029140 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:45\tclosed\tok commented 2025-10-30 10:49:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173920766 (Comments: 1) | Budros (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cześć, zmianę poprawiłem, zapoznaj się z tagiem `landuse=construction` - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction commented 2025-10-30 10:49:02 UTC by stasiu512 ♦192 |
| 172945973 (Comments: 5) | karr4s (Discussed changesets: 15) | Fausse alerte il s'agit désormais d'un Carrefour City -> j'ai tout regroupé en un seul building et indiqué les business qui existent encore en un noeud, meilleure option dès lors que l'emprise n'... commented 2025-10-30 10:47:19 UTC by divaddivag ♦122 |
| 173969105 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 217) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 5029143 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:44\tclosed\tok 5029145 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:44\tclosed\tcambiado a path el camino que sigue. COn eso ya, para efectos de autos, es sin salid... commented 2025-10-30 10:46:47 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 101139405 (Comments: 3) | Brendan 'Speedie' Smith (Discussed changesets: 5) | This has since been resolved in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102212248 commented 2025-10-30 10:46:10 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦696 |
| 126393568 (Comments: 2) | Brendan 'Speedie' Smith (Discussed changesets: 5) | This has since been resolved. It is clearly unmarked (also based on Mapillary), so zebra tag was removed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134944551 commented 2025-10-30 10:43:41 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦696 |
| 33600543 (Comments: 2) | Brendan 'Speedie' Smith (Discussed changesets: 5) | Based on other edits by this user this was an accident/mistake. The only other thing which may be missing with this castle is its supposed later use as ball alley (of which walls should still be visible), would need surveying. Removed in ht... commented 2025-10-30 10:41:19 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦696 |
| 173963394 (Comments: 1) | ortho_is_hot (Discussed changesets: 53) | Many thanks for this update. commented 2025-10-30 10:37:53 UTC by tastrax ♦1,171 |
| 173968149 (Comments: 1) | ncrau (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je confirme l'ortographe du mot "Passans" qui correspond sans doute aux usages de la période 1740 - 1835. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9forme_de_l%27orthographe_fran%C3%A7aise_de_1835 commented 2025-10-30 10:35:47 UTC by ncrau ♦1 |
| 173832671 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Devi (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have updated oneway tag. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-30 10:27:55 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦10 |
| 169010945 (Comments: 2) | Jetsie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je hebt gewoon een pad op een pad geplakt. We noemen dat duplicated ways. Ik heb het verwijderd MVG eggie commented 2025-10-30 10:16:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 98136965 (Comments: 2) | Brendan 'Speedie' Smith (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey Victor, Though this changeset is 4 years old, based on Mapillary (and the similar usernames), this path is a duplicate of the road. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899965275 seems to be incomplete to the north and part of that end ... commented 2025-10-30 10:16:11 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦696 |
| 173963275 (Comments: 5) | Nick24_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Майже всі зміни, які вносив на карту, я оглядав особисто на місцевості і маю фото розмітки та дорожніх знаків. Намагаюсь перенести на кар... commented 2025-10-30 10:03:42 UTC by Nick24_ ♦2 |
| 173928536 (Comments: 2) | csikth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, ayant une expérience personnelle des lieux pour y travailler, j'affirme que la délimitation entre le bâtiment numéro 7 et la bâtiment numéro 11 ne reflète pas la réalité commented 2025-10-30 10:03:09 UTC by csikth ♦1 |
| 173582291 (Comments: 4) | Roel Janken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Roel, In OSRM routeert het gewoon wat eigenlijk niet de bedoeling is. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.869665%2C5.853846%3B51.873282%2C5.850375#map=17/51.871480/5.852151 In andere OSM ... commented 2025-10-30 10:00:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 153462812 (Comments: 1) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour je met ce commentaire pour vous informer qu'il existe le tag cycleway=link (ainsi que footway=link) qui remplit la fonction pour laquelle vous aviez utiliser ce chemin commented 2025-10-30 09:55:30 UTC by JigAma ♦9 |
| 165386556 (Comments: 1) | Gen_Gavi (Discussed changesets: 12) | Pourquoi inventes-tu des ponts qui n'existent pas ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380864171#map=19/46.237128/5.985370 commented 2025-10-30 09:53:38 UTC by Marc Mongenet ♦25 |
| 173966739 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello?! Please have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173951679#c1504962 commented 2025-10-30 09:52:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173877738 (Comments: 2) | KarooDesert (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for reaching out and raising that concern. I’ll ensure the connection to the Nugzar Shanava Street is accurate and everything is properly aligned. Again thank you for catching that! Happy Mapping! commented 2025-10-30 09:52:15 UTC by KarooDesert ♦5 |
| 162271309 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 09:52:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173959623 (Comments: 1) | barrybarry123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 1. Please don't add `man_made=pier` directly when it's not constructed yet. `landuse=construction` + `construction:man_made=` has already been added. 2. `=pier` is for perpendicular ones projecting into the sea, not the same as loose col... commented 2025-10-30 09:47:02 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629 |
| 170934377 (Comments: 1) | allwe231 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lebih baik bikin garis sungai baru daripada menggunakan perimeter waduknya untuk dijadikan garis sungai. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55059577/history#map=15/-6.74825/107.26087 commented 2025-10-30 09:37:14 UTC by FajrAl ♦104 |
| 173965822 (Comments: 1) | Monseigneur_Patate (Discussed changesets: 1) | small error in my comment, obviously it's a building commented 2025-10-30 09:33:09 UTC by Monseigneur_Patate ♦1 |
| 173915794 (Comments: 1) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 127) | Ciao. Ho ripristinato la relazione del 522. Immagino che tu abbia aggiunto le way per raggiungere il guidepost che è solo un segnale di avvicinamento. Ivo commented 2025-10-30 09:28:16 UTC by Jrachi ♦798 |
| 173939715 (Comments: 1) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 124) | When I walked past, there were no signs for Hanspi, also the website is out of date (course begins 2023) commented 2025-10-30 09:26:48 UTC by mcg1878 ♦2 |
| 148918756 (Comments: 4) | MHNS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, I removed the access restrictions because this is a public park and a public street. If parking is not allowed on the street, then map that. commented 2025-10-30 09:22:11 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276 |
| 157179261 (Comments: 1) | Osm1980 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thank you for your attention. commented 2025-10-30 09:21:34 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦424 |
| 171200247 (Comments: 3) | Miselajus (Discussed changesets: 12) | Da haben wir unterschiedliche Beobachtungen im Gelände gemacht. Bei den von mir tatsächlich durch Begehung kartierten Standorten habe ich – wie bereits erwähnt –Kohlenreste finden können. Vielleicht hast Du nur nicht d... commented 2025-10-30 09:16:53 UTC by ti_rey_531 ♦8 |
| 173936038 (Comments: 1) | Cowboy79 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi, wäre schön, wenn du deinen Änderungssatz mit einem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments versiehst. Gruß tux67 --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-10-30 09:16:46 UTC by tux67 ♦1,982 |
| 173905737 (Comments: 3) | alain2003 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi alain2003, Thanks for sharing the references and for your work on the map! According to highway=primary, the primary classification already serves well as a major road connecting cities and areas, even before the expressway is fully complete... commented 2025-10-30 09:13:24 UTC by nona mostafa ♦75 |
| 173964754 (Comments: 2) | safetreellc (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tree services company" commented 2025-10-30 09:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173955649 (Comments: 1) | alinratna (Discussed changesets: 6) | Halo Mba/Mas, bisa bergabung ke grup telegram OSM Indonesia ? disana nanti bisa saling diskusi dan sharing terkait mapping di OSM ya. t.me/osmindonesia commented 2025-10-30 09:12:36 UTC by Akrimullah ♦41 |
 | 173960760 (Comments: 5) | miayang1661 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please stay away from complex areas, like here, tall, high buildings which need a specific knowledge how to map them. Please focus till you are experienced, on rural easy tasks. Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (mult... commented 2025-10-30 09:09:02 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| 173960776 (Comments: 2) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 77) | מתוכנן לבצע את השינוי הזה בכלל ישראל, דיון כאן: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/137190 commented 2025-10-30 09:07:26 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656 |
| 173964060 (Comments: 2) | melihgullu7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Burada harita düzenleme işlemlerine dayalı bir örnek yorum vardır: "Binalar eklendi, adı 'tarla' olan tarım arazileri" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added bu... commented 2025-10-30 09:06:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 155788186 (Comments: 2) | Teremys (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, La station a été déplacée le temps des travaux : https://www.c-velo.fr/2023/11/13/travaux-dans-le-secteur-les-paulines/ Mais effectivement le nouvel emplacement a l'air d'avoir é... commented 2025-10-30 09:00:20 UTC by Teremys ♦7 |
| 173963835 (Comments: 2) | başak barin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Burada harita düzenleme işlemlerine dayalı bir örnek yorum var: "Sokak, mahalle ve isim detayları ile terzi dükkanı eklendi" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added ta... commented 2025-10-30 08:56:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173961483 (Comments: 1) | jp1212 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dear jp1212, when you delete paths from OpenStreetMap, please provide an explanation for that in the changeset comment. "Modification" is not enough - we can see that you have modified something but we want to know why you think the path do... commented 2025-10-30 08:39:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,479 |
| 148917986 (Comments: 3) | MHNS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Even if the trail was completely on private property, deleting it from the map is not allowed. You can read about this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F So either way, the trail should b... commented 2025-10-30 08:32:13 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276 |
 | 173962617 (Comments: 1) | LupulSiberian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi LupulSiberian, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 10 highway(s) - 1 building(s) Could ... commented 2025-10-30 08:23:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 135136552 (Comments: 3) | Thierry1030 (Discussed changesets: 101) | Perfect, thanks for the background info! It threw an error in osmose, which is why I was looking for some context. Much appreciated! commented 2025-10-30 08:18:43 UTC by djsa ♦22 |
 | 173696133 (Comments: 2) | Maurine Oyugi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can I please have an answer? commented 2025-10-30 08:15:57 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173902813 (Comments: 3) | silly_me (Discussed changesets: 1) | Stimmt, ein optimales Tagging gibt es dafür nicht, Habe die Sportarten ergänzt. Wenn die Website schon beworben wird, wird sie wohl auch bald online sein commented 2025-10-30 08:12:04 UTC by Till_btn ♦25 |
| 162272102 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 07:58:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 13267829 (Comments: 1) | kristal (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162664761/history - skąd ta nazwa? commented 2025-10-30 07:54:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173944495 (Comments: 3) | Elefant aus Wuppertal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wenn du mit level=1 nicht einverstanden bist, dann sollten stattdessen der Zugang unterhalb der Brücke und die Straße unterhalb der Brücke mit level=-1 gekennzeichnet werden, da sich diese in einer Senke befinden. Bezüglich des Z... commented 2025-10-30 07:51:07 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦7 |
| 165389932 (Comments: 1) | hlmvanderheiden (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nog geen welkomstbericht ontvangen zie ik. Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-30 07:45:21 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 162304818 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 07:37:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162306330 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 07:30:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173960680 (Comments: 1) | jp1212 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi jp1212, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 highway(s) Could you please confirm if these ... commented 2025-10-30 07:29:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173947439 (Comments: 1) | Ramazanenescik04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | İnşa halindeki yapıların doğru etiketleme şeması şurada anlatılmış. Hatalı etiketleri düzelttim. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction "nolur kontrol edin" ifadeniz kastettiğiniz yolların geometriler... commented 2025-10-30 07:29:29 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| 162306494 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 07:28:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162362294 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 07:24:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162362914 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 07:20:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162537180 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 07:16:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162537484 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 07:16:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173958763 (Comments: 1) | Artisan Olive Oil Company (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Address tags corrected. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-10-30 07:07:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948 |
| 173945899 (Comments: 1) | Robotnikmajowy (Discussed changesets: 117) | Cześć! Jeżeli poprawiasz relacje autobusowe to proszę rób to porządnie, bo obecnie relacje autobusowe przebiegające przez wiadukt mają wrzucony bez żadnego porządku fragment Chełmżyńskiej. Poza tym uporządkowałem tagowanie wszyst... commented 2025-10-30 07:00:53 UTC by SzymonH ♦215 |
| 125581552 (Comments: 1) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 90) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5029335 ? Has this plans turned into anything real? commented 2025-10-30 06:58:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
 | 173939235 (Comments: 1) | lohitashwa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately you new highway are all duplicating existing highways which could disrupt routing. Thus I've reverted the changeset, all is now OK. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-10-30 06:56:16 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948 |
| 173933354 (Comments: 3) | zsoooc (Discussed changesets: 1) | *derékszögesítés eszközt Mindegy a lényeg átment. Köszi! commented 2025-10-30 06:53:04 UTC by gabro00 ♦328 |
| 173947261 (Comments: 1) | Shulamit Maler (Discussed changesets: 1) | ברוכים הבאים ל-OSM ותודה על התרומה! כמה הערות קטנות: א. הוספת בניין חדש שהזוויות שלו לא 90 מושלמות. כדי ליישר אותו, יש ללחוץ לחיצה ימני... commented 2025-10-30 06:49:14 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656 |
| 173947908 (Comments: 1) | Haley Patel (Discussed changesets: 1) | ## Movement of a node Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/11227635392, https://www.osm.org/node/7047003588 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the nodes back to the original pos... commented 2025-10-30 06:48:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173657367 (Comments: 2) | Tsu-Yi Su (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi Gregory, Thank you for the reminder, I will be more careful next time. Best Regards, Tsu-Yi commented 2025-10-30 06:46:35 UTC by Tsu-Yi Su ♦7 |
| 173957935 (Comments: 3) | Inner West Electrician (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I deleted the business details added to a footway junction. You need to place a new node (or point) at the location that your business operates from and add all you relevant business tags to that point. commented 2025-10-30 06:45:49 UTC by nevw ♦2,063 |
| 173949862 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, some names have been changed again in this changeset. Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099 Thanks. commented 2025-10-30 06:42:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173949982 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, some names have been changed again in this changeset. Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099 Thanks. commented 2025-10-30 06:42:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173950888 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, some names have been changed again in this changeset. Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099 Thanks. commented 2025-10-30 06:41:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173951453 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, some names have been changed again in this changeset. Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099 Thanks. commented 2025-10-30 06:40:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173951679 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, some names have been changed again in this changeset. Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099 Thanks. commented 2025-10-30 06:40:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173957877 (Comments: 1) | Inner West Electrician (Discussed changesets: 2) | I deleted this addition of business details to a roadway junction. commented 2025-10-30 06:39:13 UTC by nevw ♦2,063 |
| 173946493 (Comments: 1) | bilge525 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Birçok bina eklemişsiniz fakat değişiklik açıklamanıza yalnızca "farm" yazmışsınız. Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınıza kısaca ne yaptığınızı yazınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.... commented 2025-10-30 06:39:01 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
 | 173957475 (Comments: 1) | EinEngener (Discussed changesets: 130) | Hallo EinEngener, Die Bildlinks sind nicht aufrufbar (Login required), das sind nicht die öffentlichen Links von wikimedia commons. Für Bilder von WikiCommons gibt es einen eigenen Tag, am besten diesen nutzen. https://wiki.op... commented 2025-10-30 06:37:04 UTC by cowboyxup ♦24 |
| 173661339 (Comments: 1) | belltorito (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4553683089/history is it really amenity=bank and shop=department_store at the same time? have you tried to update POI that is not a bank anymore? commented 2025-10-30 06:31:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173914722 (Comments: 2) | PRIMAstmp25 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vale, voy a fijarme a partir de ahora en las etiquetas. Gracias por tus comentarios commented 2025-10-30 06:26:13 UTC by PRIMAstmp25 ♦2 |
| 173957378 (Comments: 3) | hardikpatelallstateinsurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed the blatant rubbish/ad copy description. commented 2025-10-30 06:20:37 UTC by skquinn ♦808 |
| 162537661 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 06:18:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173579250 (Comments: 2) | PRIMAstmp25 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vale, lo voy a tener en cuenta para las siguientes. Muchísimas gracias por tus comentarios commented 2025-10-30 06:17:35 UTC by PRIMAstmp25 ♦2 |
| 162538147 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 06:02:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162548162 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 05:40:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173957113 (Comments: 1) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 102) | correction: source was Protected areas of Queensland 2025. commented 2025-10-30 05:40:47 UTC by nevw ♦2,063 |
| 171524878 (Comments: 1) | Heterodyne (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, It was unnecessary to map the building as a multipolygon, the outer footprint would have sufficed. I think the dark spot in the middle is caused by a feature on the roof casting a shadow. In some places you mapped solar panels as buildings. Mo... commented 2025-10-30 05:20:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173913278 (Comments: 2) | JöWe (Discussed changesets: 1) | - der "Waldweg" ist eine forstwirtschaftliche Holzrückegasse, die inzwischen wieder Besuchs aufweist - der "Parkplatz" ist eine asphaltierte Privatfläche commented 2025-10-30 05:13:20 UTC by JöWe ♦1 |
| 173954655 (Comments: 2) | LanceSong77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed toilet amenities, including name and attributes" commented 2025-10-30 04:56:26 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 172910546 (Comments: 1) | NoKnow (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, The living street here is more or less straight and you'll only have enough room to fit everything if you move the building footprints to the base of buildings. commented 2025-10-30 04:55:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 162548552 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 04:53:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173954910 (Comments: 2) | Felysha_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/TomTom > TomTom is actively organizing mapping events. All edits made during those events are distinguished by the hashtag #tt_events. > If you have remarks about a ... commented 2025-10-30 04:45:46 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173829452 (Comments: 2) | Ra_colate (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thank you for the message. I’m glad to help, happy mapping! commented 2025-10-30 04:41:04 UTC by Ra_colate ♦17 |
| 167515107 (Comments: 11) | hayashi (Discussed changesets: 13) | あなたに改善の見込みがありませんでしたので、Data Working Groupへ報告させて頂きました。それ以降、ここでお伝えしたタグ付け方法を守られていることに感謝します。 あなたは明きら... commented 2025-10-30 04:30:15 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦28 |
| 168993087 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 91) | To be more specific, the issue with this approach is that when someone marks the road open again the turn restrictions aren't likely to be removed since the access tag is the usual method to mark a road that's closed. commented 2025-10-30 04:17:45 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 162563324 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 04:04:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162563488 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 03:56:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162623630 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 03:56:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162624240 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 03:56:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173914993 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Die Adresse an der Trauerhalle ist ja korrekt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer commented 2025-10-30 03:52:02 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 162625651 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 03:49:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 163099309 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | co na celu miała zmiana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355232129/history ? commented 2025-10-30 03:48:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 162938192 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-30 03:46:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173954843 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 76) | The destination waypoint name mentioned on the EO6 and EO15 relation is Mourgani bridge, not Mourgani. commented 2025-10-30 02:40:38 UTC by ika-chan! ♦296 |
| 173954046 (Comments: 1) | Danny Witt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2025-10-30 02:21:16 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173949124 (Comments: 1) | Bootheel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2025-10-30 02:10:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173924095 (Comments: 1) | 1981Isarom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue. Attention : les photos aériennes ne doivent pas être utilisées pour redessiner des maisons car elles montrent une image déformée de la réalité. Pour les bâtiments, uni... commented 2025-10-30 01:30:25 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 173942227 (Comments: 1) | Yxngtrxll (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the amenity=veterinary tag should only be on the node for the clinic itself, not the building way. You can add extra details to the building way like clarifying what type of building, but the double amenity=veterinary is a duplication of the same... commented 2025-10-30 01:23:33 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 173734605 (Comments: 3) | K&K13 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Awesome! I just know some armchair mappers overseas don't usually realize cul de sacs at corners like that usually denote a two-way intersection here and wanted to make sure. commented 2025-10-30 00:47:27 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173734471 (Comments: 3) | K&K13 (Discussed changesets: 3) | No worries, glad to help! commented 2025-10-30 00:45:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173953120 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 130) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264845537... commented 2025-10-30 00:41:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173940699 (Comments: 2) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello Ceirios, Thank you for you comment. Actually in German discussion group there was a post showing some funny traffic sign which this is one of it, just because of equal distances. I wondered how to find that location and I was luck... commented 2025-10-30 00:16:02 UTC by vanagaudi ♦30 |
| 173931412 (Comments: 1) | @Muneebafzal (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003899336/history/31). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/change... commented 2025-10-30 00:02:31 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64 |
| 173952365 (Comments: 2) | pophob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added surveillance cameras with ALPR type, Flock Safety manufacturer, for school and traffic zones" commented 2025-10-29 23:56:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173948698 (Comments: 1) | _IvAn_111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | А точно нет ошибки в названии улицы? Согласно сообщению мэрии - https://kzn.ru/meriya/press-tsentr/novosti/v-privolzhskom-rayone-kazani-poyavitsya-shest-novykh-ulits/ - так назвали ... commented 2025-10-29 23:52:32 UTC by fndoder ♦99 |
| 167447296 (Comments: 1) | Somnath Darkunde (Discussed changesets: 7) | Did not folow task instructions --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167447296 commented 2025-10-29 23:13:12 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 165483178 (Comments: 3) | Daan Vanderveken (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! Actually, here in France the routes are managed by local association who ask permission to local authorities to create the signposting. That is why we try to create one relation (or superrelation) per local operator. Cheers, St. commented 2025-10-29 23:13:00 UTC by StC ♦351 |
| 172971489 (Comments: 1) | JuanjoMC (Discussed changesets: 24) | I passed by today and made pictures > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1162028802546675 There are still some missing paths ... commented 2025-10-29 23:12:36 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦255 |
| 165457393 (Comments: 1) | Somnath Darkunde (Discussed changesets: 7) | The highway definitely doesn't go over one track then connect to the subsequent one. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165457393 commented 2025-10-29 23:09:14 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 173951676 (Comments: 1) | kechan_Rapid (Discussed changesets: 13) | *and roads commented 2025-10-29 23:04:49 UTC by kechan_Rapid ♦6 |
| 171420473 (Comments: 3) | Andreas_89 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Inte helt enkelt detta, men jag byter till city_block som är ännu mindre. Den är omgiven av gator, precis som dessa. Dessa är dock inte i en stad, men ifall någon kommer på något mer passande är det bara att... commented 2025-10-29 23:04:25 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦619 |
| 173951633 (Comments: 1) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 71) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 172501426. commented 2025-10-29 23:01:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 172501426 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 9) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173951633 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit commented 2025-10-29 23:01:44 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173950826 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 130) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13269002924 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-29 22:51:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173937549 (Comments: 2) | Fjarre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Du kan också skapa relationer för vandringsleder/motionsspår där du kan ange namn, vem som förvaltar leden, osv. Kolla ex på: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5539138 Eller: https://www.openstreetmap.... commented 2025-10-29 22:42:39 UTC by maasa123 ♦12 |
| 37788284 (Comments: 1) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 110) | Hallo mapper999, zu dem von dir (vor sehr langer Zeit) erstellten Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4057042002 gibt es jetzt den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5017034. Vielleicht magst du was dazu sagen und dort einen Kommenta... commented 2025-10-29 22:34:55 UTC by george1201 ♦237 |
| 173758047 (Comments: 5) | maximaximax (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sometimes people use landuse=recreation_ground + sport=horse_racing instead of leisure=sports_centre + sport=horse_racing. I don't care, as long as you don't confuse leisure=horse_riding (+ sport=equestrian) with something + sport=horse_rac... commented 2025-10-29 22:26:45 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦835 |
| 173893337 (Comments: 5) | NXN (Discussed changesets: 9) | Co do ustawy, to jest Uchwała Krajobrazowa. Ma charakter lokalny, nie ogólnokrajowy. Z tego co wiem w gminie Raszyn ta Uchwała dopiero ma wejść w życie, ale deweloperom na etapie uzyskania pozwolenia na budowę mogą narzucać warunki gro... commented 2025-10-29 22:23:02 UTC by NXN ♦6 |
| 173950495 (Comments: 1) | Jose7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres strony internetowej został skrócony przez serwis t... commented 2025-10-29 22:20:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173904201 (Comments: 2) | NXN (Discussed changesets: 9) | Nie jestem autorem tego tag'u, ale wygląda na pozostałości od innego status odcinka chodnika. Naprawione, dzięki za uwagę. commented 2025-10-29 22:17:29 UTC by NXN ♦6 |
| 173919602 (Comments: 2) | MaNaujoks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13265454452: Du hast hier eine Talsperre angelegt. Das ist defintiv falsch. Gleichzeitig steht in name "Löschwasserbrunnen"; zum einen muss der Name raus, zum anderen is... commented 2025-10-29 22:13:24 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173895201 (Comments: 1) | MaNaujoks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, bitte Warnungen des Editors beachten, du hast hier Straßen, Wasserläufe und landuses verschoben. Ich habe das mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173950392 korrigiert. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-29 22:05:07 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173363403 (Comments: 1) | Atdec Nantes Métropole (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre contribution, mais l'adresse est maintenant incohérente avec la position du point. Il faut que vous supprimiez ce point et en recréez un nouveau au nouvel emplacement. Ou éventuellemen... commented 2025-10-29 22:03:38 UTC by zorun ♦8 |
| 159978964 (Comments: 1) | maferarq (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola. En las numeraciones por favor solo la numeración. La palabra Parcela sobra en este caso. Gracias commented 2025-10-29 22:03:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173886056 (Comments: 1) | turbopixel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, wenn der Hydrant noch vorhanden, aber nicht mehr in Betrieb ist, diesen dann bitte nicht löschen und auf disused:emergency=fire_hydrant setzen. Sonst besteht das Risiko, dass dieser wieder neu angelegt wird. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-29 22:02:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173950307 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 217) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 5028988 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 23:00\tclosed\tok 5029002 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 23:00\tclosed\tok 5028995 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 23:00\tclosed\tok 5029009 (iD)\tfel... commented 2025-10-29 22:01:46 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 165290910 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Changing the layer means this is above the ground, not on the ground. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165290910 commented 2025-10-29 21:54:43 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173934203 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 5) | I reverted some parts of your edit. The Wild Rover is still there. I surveyed it tonight to be sure. It is still operating. commented 2025-10-29 21:53:10 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 173886817 (Comments: 1) | turbopixel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, wenn du gerade ohnehin mit der Kontrolle und Überarbeitung befasst bist: da Hydranten keinen Namen haben wäre es schön, wenn du diese Namen entfernen würdest. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-29 21:52:46 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173943101 (Comments: 1) | PaulDavis249 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for keeping the map up to date. The point you moved is on the wall of the building. Is that where the entrance for your office is? Typically we put the place point inside the building and have a separate point for the entrance. commented 2025-10-29 21:52:38 UTC by iandees ♦752 |
| 163015786 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Probably should be name=K-9 Resorts branch=Westbury. Name should only be the name. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163015786 commented 2025-10-29 21:49:07 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 172378039 (Comments: 1) | dugolf60 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Concernant les fermetures, il vaut mieux également supprimer les tags qui deviennent caduques. Sinon, cela peut déclencher des alertes comme : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005130... commented 2025-10-29 21:46:01 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦22 |
| 156717065 (Comments: 1) | Zesstra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Zesstra! Bei diesem Knoten stimmte deine Änderung von 2024 aber ganz und gar nicht ... Warst du denn 2024/09 dort? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4146923451 Ich war heute dort, da ist ein seit längerer Zeit leerst... commented 2025-10-29 21:41:34 UTC by goodidea ♦102 |
| 173883629 (Comments: 1) | Alex Tzimas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen: - Auch wenn das der Name „laut Gemeinde“ ist: ausschlaggebend ist das, was auf dem Schild steht. - Die Adressen passen jetzt ... commented 2025-10-29 21:35:43 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173943509 (Comments: 5) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 213) | Ja bym zostawił rozdzielenie, aby nikomu nie przyszło do głowy ponownie rozdzielać połączone fragmenty (przy okazji zapewne psując przy tym relacje). commented 2025-10-29 21:32:43 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
 | 173619466 (Comments: 1) | MaxR_6429 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hello MaxR_6429. I noticed you opened up Horadiz-Cəbrayıl-Zəngilan-Ağbənd yolu. According to various articles from 2025-09-16 (https://report.az/en/infrastructure/horadiz-jabrayil-zangilan-aghband-road-95-complete, https://report.az/en/in... commented 2025-10-29 21:31:59 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦17 |
 | 173936931 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hola J00SECI, ¿Basado en qué fuente has modificado la geometría de los elementos existentes? ¿Podrías dejar de hacer estos cambios sin sentido? Atentamente, Porfirio Páiz commented 2025-10-29 21:30:00 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦114 |
| 173597567 (Comments: 1) | AutumnLaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173949408 commented 2025-10-29 21:27:24 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 173949286 (Comments: 1) | Căprar Andrei (Discussed changesets: 5) | extra source: survey commented 2025-10-29 21:26:51 UTC by Căprar Andrei ♦4 |
| 173943859 (Comments: 1) | Mick Kolb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Vorausgesetzt, es handelt es sich grundsätzlich um die Bauform „Unterflurhydrant“, habe ich folgende Anmerkungen: - ... commented 2025-10-29 21:26:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 159153734 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please don't adapt buildings into landuse like this. Easiest way to add a dog park if you're not sure how to map it is to just add a single point node, not to decide a building doesn't exist and is now a different shape. ... commented 2025-10-29 21:13:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173934812 (Comments: 17) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Leo.. thx. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-29 21:07:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173268766 (Comments: 1) | anautiyal_lyft (Discussed changesets: 6) | This changeset connected a bridge to the road it crosses. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173268766 commented 2025-10-29 21:07:18 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 173367931 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | No, this isn't a building. Accuracy matters. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173367931 commented 2025-10-29 21:04:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173925523 (Comments: 1) | moltes74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset connected a bridge to the road it crosses. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173925523 commented 2025-10-29 20:59:54 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 173368459 (Comments: 1) | MWBtfd (Discussed changesets: 3) | Boy, put my road back commented 2025-10-29 20:58:56 UTC by andrew-m8387 ♦1 |
| 152929060 (Comments: 2) | Thibault Rommel (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello I work for the traffic department of the city, so I know the situation quite well. The one-way mapping is correct. You can check by comparing it with the traffic sign data available here: https://www.geopunt.be/shared/5a1360ad-883b-40f4-bf3a... commented 2025-10-29 20:56:16 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦82 |
| 166199073 (Comments: 1) | raf57575757 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-29 20:55:44 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173947077 (Comments: 1) | raf57575757 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-29 20:55:27 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173098189 (Comments: 1) | mapmakersami (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi there! while i do not disagree with your change, please note that "unclassified" has a very distinct meaning in OSM highway tagging, it is not an "unidentified" road type. commented 2025-10-29 20:47:22 UTC by jcarlson ♦117 |
| 173947691 (Comments: 1) | Lars2435 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-29 20:43:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173859107 (Comments: 2) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 129) | Fair, wycofam zaraz zmianę w takim razie commented 2025-10-29 20:40:39 UTC by Anas masuris ♦138 |
| 173937062 (Comments: 1) | BlueMethod (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13267350845. Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at ht... commented 2025-10-29 20:27:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
 | 173947048 (Comments: 2) | hibvv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "J'ai supprimé le restaurant, mis à jour les détails de l'immeuble d'appartements" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sa... commented 2025-10-29 20:27:00 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173940736 (Comments: 3) | valaise (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks for understanding! And apologies for the rash revert (wanted to avoid further conflicts in case additional park details were being added today). Appreciate your help in adding amenity details to these parks, as I hadn't been able t... commented 2025-10-29 20:10:44 UTC by MapSpot ♦97 |
| 173941642 (Comments: 1) | GiaJae-SSB AG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert, dieses wegstück war korrekt und ist nicht das Problem! Hallo GiaJae-SSB AG, willkommen bei OSM. Das "Problem" ist die unechte Einbahnstraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267202178/history in Höhe der Halte... commented 2025-10-29 20:08:14 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,354 |
| 173944302 (Comments: 4) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Yeah, removing existing Polish names (which are correct) is definitely wrong. Especially with no source provided commented 2025-10-29 19:53:26 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
| 173930214 (Comments: 1) | Damian Kowalczyk (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085013157 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-10-29 19:52:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173938802 (Comments: 1) | DanielRaz23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być fo... commented 2025-10-29 19:52:44 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173946099 (Comments: 1) | martien-176 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Lokale kennis commented 2025-10-29 19:48:43 UTC by martien-176 ♦358 |
| 162982726 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 551) | Coś nie wyszedł ten rewert... Autor zmiany dosyć mętnie, ale napisał o co mu chodzi, albo raczej czego nie zrozumiał: miejscowość nazywa się Kamień, a to zapewne wersja w jakimś innym języku . commented 2025-10-29 19:47:19 UTC by VA00 ♦606 |
| 173899169 (Comments: 2) | Kay Klotzsche (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke, das ändere ich noch so commented 2025-10-29 19:33:11 UTC by Kay Klotzsche ♦2 |
| 173944070 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 68) | Thank you! commented 2025-10-29 19:27:17 UTC by valaise ♦17 |
 | 169750230 (Comments: 1) | b-jazz-bot (Discussed changesets: 76) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014294631 Такие объекты лучше обозначать тегом shop=trade commented 2025-10-29 19:23:07 UTC by Vodevil_Mark ♦13 |
| 173918837 (Comments: 1) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 125) | Tutaj w okolicy wiaduktu było dobrze z "use_sidepath", zmieniłeś źle na "yes": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192072352 Popraw to proszę commented 2025-10-29 19:21:01 UTC by Szymson ♦421 |
| 173846561 (Comments: 3) | Torsten Holmer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, brownfield dürfte in 90% aller Fälle begrünt sein - das hat nichts mit der Farbe bzw. der Oberfläche zu tun. natural=grassland ist innerorts fast immer falsch. landuse=grass wäre es, wenn es dauerhaft als nich... commented 2025-10-29 19:20:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 168051793 (Comments: 1) | Seandebasti (Discussed changesets: 102) | Hello. By chance I came across this tertiary road (185334981) and I notice 2 tags that maybe you wanted to put on the cycle path just below? The tertiary road (Via Martiri della Libertà) does not have any cycle lanes while Lungomare Cristoforo... commented 2025-10-29 18:56:00 UTC by LucianoC63 ♦2 |
| 163053475 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 18:47:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173899882 (Comments: 2) | agarrett528 (Discussed changesets: 2) | thank you! commented 2025-10-29 18:45:50 UTC by agarrett528 ♦1 |
| 160780525 (Comments: 3) | ITineris (Discussed changesets: 70) | Nope. A DNY-i és ÉK-i Rákóczinak macisajtja van. Mint ahogyan mondtam, ma mentem át rajta autóval, és sem egyik, sem másik irányban nem egyezett a levezetett vonal a felvitt görb&uum... commented 2025-10-29 18:45:12 UTC by balint36 ♦214 |
| 163099037 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 18:45:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 163099359 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 18:38:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173898798 (Comments: 4) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 274) | "Po oddaniu całego węzła znaczenie wzrośnie." - to nie ma wpływu na aktualną ważność commented 2025-10-29 18:33:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 156834765 (Comments: 2) | KDTW Flyer (Discussed changesets: 9) | proceeding, got no response commented 2025-10-29 18:25:30 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110 |
| 173939813 (Comments: 7) | BigRedPie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gracias a ti por la información. No conocía esa web que se chivaba de esas nuevas etiquetas usadas. commented 2025-10-29 18:23:45 UTC by BigRedPie ♦2 |
| 163099778 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 18:23:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173932146 (Comments: 3) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Daar is (helaas) geen consensus over. Zie ook https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/taggen-van-scholen-in-nl-naar-aanleiding-van-nieuwe-tag/93211 Ookwel, een van beide kan. Zelf ben ik voor landuse=education op het vlak en amenity=school op de adr... commented 2025-10-29 18:21:20 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦28 |
| 163210431 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 18:18:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173922887 (Comments: 3) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 551) | proszę też wyjaśnij skąd się wzięły nazwy w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 jeśli tego nie zrobisz każda nazwa ... commented 2025-10-29 18:15:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172476530 (Comments: 1) | Pooh01 (Discussed changesets: 23) | jak nie ma nawet projektu to za wcześnie na mapowanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173942506 commented 2025-10-29 18:01:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173937795 (Comments: 1) | antonella341 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Antonella341. ¿Puedes contarme que es lo que has querido modificar aquí, para poder mapearlo correctamente? Por lo que veo, modificaste el área del edificio que antes estaba bien mapeado, según fotos satelitales. ... commented 2025-10-29 17:57:39 UTC by mweper ♦427 |
| 173318382 (Comments: 2) | TommyRobloxOfficial (Discussed changesets: 17) | Okej, dzięki za rade. commented 2025-10-29 17:56:37 UTC by TommyRobloxOfficial ♦5 |
| 173904042 (Comments: 3) | NXN (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ogólnie warto patrzeć na błędy, które walidatory edytora znajdują przed wysłaniem zmian, ale nie zawsze to co iD proponuje jest sensowne, prawidłowe, bądź konieczne. Więc na to bym patrzył z przymrużeniem oka ;) |
| 173853417 (Comments: 2) | smaptious (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi user_5359, Thanks for pointing this out. That tag was somehow inadvertently added to that grass polygon. I will go ahead and remove it. commented 2025-10-29 17:27:02 UTC by smaptious ♦11 |
| 173917938 (Comments: 1) | MiroJanosik (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ahoj, prosim, oprav si nasledovne chyby: 1) z budovy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58927432 si odstranil tagy "ref:minvskaddress" a "source:addr". Nakolko budova stale existuje a adresa sa nezmenila, nie je dovod odmazat... commented 2025-10-29 17:24:43 UTC by t_ja ♦217 |
| 173284351 (Comments: 1) | ithianm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, Veo que han continuado mi línea eléctrica desde la subestación de Santa Rosalía y que han encontrado una nueva subestación: Palestina. No consigo ver esta subestación en las imágene... commented 2025-10-29 17:24:19 UTC by nlehuby ♦113 |
| 173940145 (Comments: 2) | MAPPERAVG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ось приклад коментаря на основі ваших редагувань мапи: "Видалено номер будинку" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Remove... commented 2025-10-29 17:16:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173908084 (Comments: 1) | jadynm (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Add the flock device as a separate node. I look for the pole's shaddow to place the node. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908084 commented 2025-10-29 17:09:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173931202 (Comments: 2) | Jejko02 (Discussed changesets: 61) | Robisz koszmarne literówki w nazwach (o ile są one w ogóle prawdziwe) - popraw, proszę. commented 2025-10-29 17:06:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173894148 (Comments: 1) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bonjour, Les attributs addr:city=* et addr:postcode=* ne sont pas nécessaires. Extrait du wiki : "Les attributs tels que addr:country=*, addr:city=* et addr:postcode=* sont en général redondantes pour un él&... commented 2025-10-29 17:06:03 UTC by vincenttux ♦3 |
| 173898881 (Comments: 1) | Jerzy Jeżewski (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-29 17:05:04 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173900522 (Comments: 1) | bjnk954 (Discussed changesets: 23) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-29 17:04:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173918354 (Comments: 1) | bjnk954 (Discussed changesets: 23) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-29 17:04:20 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173865424 (Comments: 1) | Whattaflock (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: The device should be on a stand alone node not on a existing way. I look for the pole's shaddow to determine where to place the node. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2025-10-29 16:59:24 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173925883 (Comments: 1) | jesusdereinzigwahre28 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und willkommen bei OSM, die Änderung des Straßennamens und der Hausnummer widersprechen der Umgebung und ALKIS (Maarfeld -> Marfeld, Nr. 40 doppelt) und habe ich daher rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-29 16:58:06 UTC by aixbrick ♦868 |
| 168831516 (Comments: 1) | Anthuil (Discussed changesets: 8) | bonjour, ce ne sont pas des pistes cyclables séparées. Cycleway= lane ds ce cas (piste cyclable marquée) commented 2025-10-29 16:52:39 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15 |
| 173938743 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 217) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 5027170 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:38\tclosed\tok.. 5027165 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:38\tclosed\tok.. 5027172 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:38\tclosed\tok.. 5027167 (iD... commented 2025-10-29 16:40:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173937774 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, I noticed that this street is tagged as: name=вулиця Івана Вакарчука name:uk=вулиця Івана Вакарчука name:pl=ulica Badenich old_name:uk=вулиця Кіндрата Рилєєва It ... commented 2025-10-29 16:34:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173938374 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 217) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 5027153 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:28\tclosed\tok 5027156 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:27\tclosed\tok 5027163 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:27\tclosed\tok 5027157 (iD)\tfel... commented 2025-10-29 16:32:14 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173937321 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, I noticed that this street is tagged as: name=вулиця Сидора Голубовича name:uk=вулиця Сидора Голубовича name:en=Sydora Holubovycha Street name:ru=Сидора Голубовича ули... commented 2025-10-29 16:26:01 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173925930 (Comments: 2) | szabba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Javítva itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173938040 commented 2025-10-29 16:25:35 UTC by infeeeee ♦596 |
| 173884690 (Comments: 5) | keichwa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Die Dinge sollten jetzt im wesentlichen passen. Leider stimmt jetzt etwas mit den Relationen nicht (ich habe total vergessen, wie das ging...). Eventuell muss der Service-Weg ums Gebaeude noch irgendwie private oder fuer Zulieferung getaggt werde... commented 2025-10-29 16:24:26 UTC by keichwa ♦3 |
| 173937262 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, I noticed that the street name was changed from "ulica Marko Wowczki" to "ulica Królowej Jadwigi". Since this is a Polish street name in Ukraine, could you please confirm whether this change reflects an offic... commented 2025-10-29 16:17:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173909035 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 91) | Well, Russia also held a "referendum" in those four oblasts (I put it in quotes because the international community views them as illegitimate). Also, just to clarify, Russia actually 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘥 them, not just occupied the... commented 2025-10-29 15:54:46 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦118 |
 | 173930834 (Comments: 1) | ממפהX (Discussed changesets: 2) | שלום! גם כאן הוספתם בניין שחופף עם הבניין הקיים: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445992754 צריך לתקן את הבניין הקיים ולתייג אותו כמרפאה מאשר להוסיף ע... commented 2025-10-29 15:52:07 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656 |
| 169664285 (Comments: 1) | ממפהX (Discussed changesets: 2) | שלום ותודה על התרומה למפה. הבניין שהוספת חופף עם בניין קיים. אם מדובר בשתי נקודות עניין בבניין בודד, יש להוסיף אותן כ-points ולא כבניינים חופפ... commented 2025-10-29 15:50:10 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656 |
| 173931914 (Comments: 1) | Agoraphilic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Did this building get destroyed or the address removed? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173931914 commented 2025-10-29 15:37:50 UTC by iandees ♦752 |
| 147033034 (Comments: 1) | Compositor (Discussed changesets: 29) | בבקשה לתייג חסימה בהתאם. אם אתה יוצר נקודה בלי תגיות אף מפה לא מציגה אותה וחבל. commented 2025-10-29 15:35:17 UTC by hatul ♦410 |
| 173707886 (Comments: 2) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Footsteps of Ancestors, thank you very much for acknowledging this. I’m glad to expand my knowledge and understanding and always happy to improve the map for all. commented 2025-10-29 15:28:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦2 |
| 173786938 (Comments: 3) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 77) | עדכנתי ל-level=2 כאן: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173935602 בשינוי הקודם הנחתי שיש רק קומה אחת לפני הכניסה על סמך הדיווח תודה :) commented 2025-10-29 15:27:44 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656 |
| 173933902 (Comments: 1) | Fjarre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vänligen läs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names om användning av name-taggen. "Vandringsled" m m är beskrivande namn som inte bör användas i osm enligt osm-wiki. Vill du vara hygglig att ta bort ... commented 2025-10-29 15:14:01 UTC by archie ♦1,355 |
| 172918008 (Comments: 3) | fuling09260524 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 旧道路标签单行道与公交车双向通行是自相矛盾，单独表示已经是很符合现实的表现形式。物理独立意义不明。没有中央隔离带却双向分开表示的道路比比皆是 commented 2025-10-29 15:05:57 UTC by fuling09260524 ♦3 |
| 173923997 (Comments: 2) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hallo, Danke, hatte die Nummer im www recherchiert. Inzwisvchen hat ein anderer User das auf "moblie" geändert. Falls noch etwas fehlt, gib mir bitte Bescheid.. commented 2025-10-29 15:05:15 UTC by MichaelFS ♦62 |
| 172181852 (Comments: 1) | PèreForez (Discussed changesets: 25) | Bonjour PèreForez, je ne comprends pas ce que vous avez souhaité faire ici. J'ai visité ce site il y a 6 mois et il est possible que cela ait changé. Si ce n'est pas le cas, la plaque que vous avez retirée... commented 2025-10-29 15:00:11 UTC by divaddivag ♦122 |
| 173786438 (Comments: 2) | BudgieInWA (Discussed changesets: 11) | I wasn't precisely sure, so I was going for the generic "Australian Aboriginal", which is actually spelled "name:aus" as it turns out. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australia%27s_Fir... commented 2025-10-29 14:59:33 UTC by BudgieInWA ♦29 |
| 173629525 (Comments: 2) | lenny25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, ich habe nur die Anzahl der Bügel gezählt! Ich wusste nicht, dass die Info schon vorhanden war - in der StreetComplete App wurde mir das als Aufgabe angezeigt. Ich habe meine Änderungen wieder rückgängig gemacht: ht... commented 2025-10-29 14:57:10 UTC by lenny25 ♦1 |
| 164294437 (Comments: 1) | MHD (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, das Schützenheim ist auf aktuellen Luftbilder nicht zu sehen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165743349 Grüße Chris commented 2025-10-29 14:40:43 UTC by chris66 ♦413 |
| 173933259 (Comments: 1) | Himké (Discussed changesets: 77) | Use highway=corridor and indoor=yes for pedways within buildings; highway=footway and covered=yes for pedways outside buildings commented 2025-10-29 14:36:31 UTC by Himké ♦75 |
| 173915551 (Comments: 1) | PRIMAstmp25 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, cambio la abrebiación "C/..." por los respectivos Calle o Carrer según corresponda en la zona. Tienes más info aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not) commented 2025-10-29 14:29:03 UTC by aTarom ♦824 |
| 173931822 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 163) | According to the official source the road should be part of the National Netowrk, however the abundance of signs that state it is prohibited for trucks makes the National Network tags on that road incorrect #OptimoRoute commented 2025-10-29 14:01:38 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178 |
| 173691235 (Comments: 1) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 165) | Nie wiem co miałeś na celu zmieniając łuki dróg na kanciaste. Przywróciłem poprzednią, dokładniejszą geometrię. commented 2025-10-29 13:52:27 UTC by YomanNH ♦387 |
| 173691344 (Comments: 1) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 165) | Nie wiem co miałeś na celu zmieniając łuki dróg na kanciaste. Przywróciłem poprzednią, dokładniejszą geometrię. commented 2025-10-29 13:52:24 UTC by YomanNH ♦387 |
| 173876901 (Comments: 2) | pan_borsuk (Discussed changesets: 72) | dziękuje Krabie. już widzę co dałem za dużo poszedłem na łatwiznę i aaplikowałem tym dwum domom..punkt adresowy instead :-) pozdr z małopolski commented 2025-10-29 13:52:16 UTC by pan_borsuk ♦61 |
| 171703944 (Comments: 2) | Agadzi Seth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi again. The reason you added a layer to this building was wrong. This building, like many other tall (high) buildings are not placed on their footprint. This is the place where the building meets the ground. Keep an eye on complex buildi... commented 2025-10-29 13:51:57 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| 173817748 (Comments: 2) | seateaeye (Discussed changesets: 10) | I think I just wasn't careful while editing, thanks for noticing this and correcting it. commented 2025-10-29 13:44:55 UTC by seateaeye ♦4 |
| 71378159 (Comments: 1) | jpl-brz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698091053#map=16/48.66729/-4.32705 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698091054#map=16/48.66729/-4.32705 ces cheminements ne sont pas nommés. Voir n'existent pas vra... commented 2025-10-29 13:39:51 UTC by trial ♦957 |
| 145269578 (Comments: 3) | Matheus Moreira CE (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Matheus, thanks for answering. I think, the new 1600 mm railway should be named "Nova Transnordestina", while the old 1000 mm could be "FV Transnordestina" to make it easier to separate them. Btw... do You have sour... commented 2025-10-29 13:36:58 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦38 |
| 173481478 (Comments: 7) | heliigamt (Discussed changesets: 5) | So a la "Ich verstehe, dass es mühsam ist, unerwünschten Menschen hier hinterher-aufzuräumen, wenn der Grillplatz privat ist. In den OpenStreetMap-Daten gilt aber der Grundsatz, dass etwas, das in der Realität existiert... commented 2025-10-29 13:23:19 UTC by habi ♦1,938 |
| 116885614 (Comments: 1) | sykul (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello I have removed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173926066 It was only ever a proposal yet you made no mention of this in the changeset description and tagged it as an active area causing issues for data users. Ad... commented 2025-10-29 13:20:51 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,402 |
| 173906819 (Comments: 1) | David L Hill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just a heads up, if there's no lane lines, then lane_markings=no should be used, not lanes=2. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173906819 commented 2025-10-29 13:19:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173929628 (Comments: 1) | floppa (Discussed changesets: 12) | Cześć historyczne nazwy dodajemy w znaczniku old_name:pl, nie w name:pl commented 2025-10-29 13:18:40 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
| 173921295 (Comments: 3) | chriscolemanallstateinsurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | The description tag, or anywhere else in OSM, is a wholly inappropriate venue for ad copy. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173921295 commented 2025-10-29 13:17:57 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173921828 (Comments: 2) | camilleMa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido. commented 2025-10-29 13:14:46 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112 |
| 173922288 (Comments: 2) | camilleMa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido. commented 2025-10-29 13:14:39 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112 |
| 173922434 (Comments: 2) | camilleMa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido. commented 2025-10-29 13:14:31 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112 |
| 173656347 (Comments: 1) | heliigamt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Lieber Mensch vom heliigamt Der Grillplatz existiert 'on the ground', deshalb ist deine Löschung hier sinnlos, jeder Beitragende in OSM kann diesen deshalb wieder eintragen. Es ist viel besser, den Grillplatz mit den korrekten Zu... commented 2025-10-29 13:14:04 UTC by habi ♦1,938 |
| 173928756 (Comments: 1) | Bakuvian (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salam, "Bing Maps"-i referans aldığınızı gördüm. Daha iç küçələr və ya parklar üçün "Esri World Imagery" işlədə bilərsiniz, görüntüləri daha yeni və keyfiy... commented 2025-10-29 13:13:45 UTC by alikiso ♦1 |
| 173656318 (Comments: 1) | heliigamt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wir können das beliebig lange machen... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173929313 commented 2025-10-29 13:10:42 UTC by habi ♦1,938 |
| 173904783 (Comments: 2) | sundew (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hallo, also postal_code=29664 ist eigentlich das Richtige laut Packstation-Mappingschema. Hast du aber wieder entfernt. Packstationen haben keine eigene Adresse, sondern nur eine offizielle Referenzadresse. Also wäre alternativ ref:addr:p... commented 2025-10-29 13:09:23 UTC by sundew ♦75 |
| 173928024 (Comments: 1) | Janvdberg48 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Je commentaar is Locatie Crevecoeur gecentreed . In werkelijkheid heb je de naam verwijderd? Je edits https://ov... commented 2025-10-29 13:08:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173927592 (Comments: 2) | Maschambe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tres temas con esta edición: 1) escribimos con capitalización normal, no en mayúsculas. Además por favor cuidar la ortografía. 2) el tag building es para estructuras, no para el recinto completo. 3) ojo por... commented 2025-10-29 13:04:07 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173927246 (Comments: 1) | Maschambe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Por favor no borrar elementos solo porque están mal ubicados. Pueden trasladarse. Además la posta no es un hospital. Voy a corregirlo. En todo caso muchas gracias por su tiempo y aportes.Estos err... commented 2025-10-29 13:00:05 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173928471 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 163) | The node was accidentally created and it was deleted in changeset 173928592 since it served no purpose https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173928592 commented 2025-10-29 12:58:39 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178 |
| 173838066 (Comments: 4) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hm, die Beschreibung für water_park ist schon sehr "Erlebnisbad! Alles voller Rutschen und Wellenbecken!". Ich hätte schon lieber gerne einen Tag zwischen Erlebnisbad und Sportschwimmen, für Bäder die keine Becken haben ... commented 2025-10-29 12:55:24 UTC by akino_germany ♦20 |
| 173925905 (Comments: 1) | Ansofter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Angelegte Sackgassen wurden von mir falsch verwendet (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing). commented 2025-10-29 12:51:47 UTC by Ansofter ♦4 |
| 173927062 (Comments: 1) | Ansofter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Angelegte Sackgassen wurden von mir falsch verwendet (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing). Entsprechend wurden ungerechtfertigte Sackgassen in #173928290 wieder entfernt. commented 2025-10-29 12:51:32 UTC by Ansofter ♦4 |
| 172259037 (Comments: 2) | LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | (See changeset 173928274 for my proposed update) commented 2025-10-29 12:51:25 UTC by djsa ♦22 |
| 173923506 (Comments: 1) | SinsBird (Discussed changesets: 1) | O kodėl buvo pakeistos kelių klasifikacijos? Viskas su jomis buvo gerai. Dabartinis variantas visiškai blogas. Aš atšauksiu visą šitą pakeitimą. commented 2025-10-29 12:45:22 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,990 |
| 173762027 (Comments: 3) | Thomas-Munichways (Discussed changesets: 5) | Was ich gesehen habe sieht gut aus. commented 2025-10-29 12:44:57 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 170922742 (Comments: 1) | GJanis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thank you for your contributions. I was asked to verify name changes. Bing Maps indicates that the extension of the street, until Dreef, is calle Kerkplein. It would make sense, surrounding completely the St-Gertrudiskerk. Could you provide a... commented 2025-10-29 12:40:39 UTC by VLD549 ♦307 |
 | 173927722 (Comments: 1) | ENGELBERT MODO (Discussed changesets: 14) | Good job MODO commented 2025-10-29 12:39:44 UTC by ENGELBERT MODO ♦10 |
| 173899234 (Comments: 1) | CowCowManThingit (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted fictional edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173927529 commented 2025-10-29 12:33:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463 |
| 76037675 (Comments: 1) | Eric Bie (Discussed changesets: 56) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9165888/history/6 était correctement nommé, la version non conforme était dans official_name, pourquoi avoir changé name ? commented 2025-10-29 12:29:52 UTC by trial ♦957 |
 | 173399222 (Comments: 1) | Zenfiric (Discussed changesets: 118) | Да ли желимо да назив буде 'Римокатоличка црква Свете Ане' или само 'Црква Свете Ане'? Пошто тренутно имамо један назив у '... commented 2025-10-29 12:16:18 UTC by MaliMrav ♦53 |
| 173925130 (Comments: 2) | bilge525 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added water basin with intermittent feature, named Kızıksuyu" commented 2025-10-29 11:46:33 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 169926149 (Comments: 2) | Derkades (Discussed changesets: 13) | Simply removing the speed limit is wrong, you have to update it to current value. If there is no speed limit maxspeed=none is to be set. And if you've driven there on the 2nd of August 2025 there must have been signs, not 80 but 120. 2025-07-... commented 2025-10-29 11:30:00 UTC by tvbrene ♦23 |
| 173879059 (Comments: 2) | sys3175 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's still a visible cutline (no trees,only grass and little shrubs), but no longer a firebreak because the railway has been removed. - Of course, one could remove the tag completely. I kept it to show the history... commented 2025-10-29 11:27:06 UTC by sys3175 ♦1 |
| 173867547 (Comments: 3) | cicciobisticcio (Discussed changesets: 8) | Il guaio sono quei percorsi a catasto "rilevati" da un professionista che dopo 10-15 anni scopri essere non transitabili. Ti ringrazio della segnalazione, provvedo a inviare il problema a chi se ne deve occupare. Ivo commented 2025-10-29 11:25:52 UTC by Jrachi ♦798 |
| 159653544 (Comments: 4) | gymko (Discussed changesets: 28) | Ďakujem commented 2025-10-29 11:24:55 UTC by gymko ♦22 |
| 173787536 (Comments: 1) | GanderPL (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, "hazard:flammable_gas" is not a common tag. Is there a ban for gas-fueled vehicles here? That's often tagged as "access:fuel:lpg=no" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13257381979 commented 2025-10-29 11:22:48 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 172149710 (Comments: 5) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 65) | Мерси за линка, там открих amenity=canteen, което изглежда най-точно. commented 2025-10-29 11:09:41 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦727 |
| 173922733 (Comments: 1) | Aartsie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Aartsie..] review_requested \tyes Lijkt me oke zo. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-29 11:09:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 135727984 (Comments: 4) | stadt-Due-Lengsfeld (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo limes11, da der entsprechende Sachbearbeiter nicht bei OSM registriert ist, leite ich Ihnen seine Antwort weiter: Der im Plan gekennzeichnete Weg ist ein privater Weg, der einzig der Erschließung der landwirtschaftlichen Fläche... commented 2025-10-29 10:54:58 UTC by stadt-Due-Lengsfeld ♦2 |
| 163256908 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 10:52:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173884191 (Comments: 2) | Denis_Helfer (Discussed changesets: 71) | mistyping of course correction is ongoing Thanks for your survey commented 2025-10-29 10:44:31 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦97 |
| 33455089 (Comments: 1) | Bayu Adi Styawan (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/366614886. What is the mean of the tag M:flood_prone = no ? commented 2025-10-29 10:31:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173921825 (Comments: 2) | TA Hale (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Van Zandt County community location" commented 2025-10-29 10:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173279132 (Comments: 3) | Fabienamnet (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok, merci Je vais explorer les docs BANO/pifomètre pour voir comment tagguer cela au mieux commented 2025-10-29 10:26:07 UTC by BrunoC ♦4 |
| 173873296 (Comments: 1) | Volkmar Glauche (Discussed changesets: 5) | Der Outfit Laden hat nichts mit der englischen Kette zu tun (die Laut verlinktem wiki auch nicht mehr existiert) sondern wird von "Vereinigung Freiburger Sozialarbeit e.V." getragen https://www.vfs-ev.de/kleiderladen-outfit/outfit... commented 2025-10-29 10:22:15 UTC by Hannes0815 ♦1 |
| 173116971 (Comments: 1) | reformer_splicing696 (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour, une piste cyclable marquée n epeut pas être considérée et encodée comme une piste cyclable (indépendante de la voirie). Il faudrait mettre un attribut à la voirie avec bdande cyclable ordinaire... commented 2025-10-29 10:12:19 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15 |
| 162323540 (Comments: 2) | Vassilis Chryssos (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ευχαριστώ για το σχόλιο! Δεν το είχα παρατηρήσε&io... commented 2025-10-29 10:09:42 UTC by Vassilis Chryssos ♦4 |
| 163736196 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 10:01:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173720936 (Comments: 1) | MMaarrttiinn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Eigenname ist völlig falsch. Das mit dem Augustinerchorherrenstift gilt für die Infotafel auf der anderen Straßenseite. Bitte erstmal genauer informieren, bevor man mit StreetComplete in OSM Fehler reinbringt. Ich habe es eben zur... commented 2025-10-29 10:01:39 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦137 |
| 173917428 (Comments: 4) | hrnylmz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da's mooi... Dan had de verbinding even de hik. Ik heb nog wel de format phone aangepast naar +31 ... MVG egie commented 2025-10-29 10:01:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 163747822 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 10:00:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173896769 (Comments: 5) | Pascougnou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voilà, c'est fait. Bonne journée et bonne continuation sur OSM ;-) commented 2025-10-29 09:59:49 UTC by bazgal ♦18 |
| 163763652 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 09:59:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173843889 (Comments: 1) | ZebraLisa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey Lisa Das Gebäude heisst schon seit 10 Jahren Zebrabox in OpenStreetMap. Du hast das hier dupliziert, und der Account Sandra_ste hat dem Gebäude vor einer Woche alle Zebrabox-Werte vergeben. Ist die Zebrabox im *ganzen* Geba&aum... commented 2025-10-29 09:55:49 UTC by habi ♦1,938 |
| 173895178 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 09:55:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173854823 (Comments: 3) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | dodatkowo: jaka jest licencja Kajakiem Po Wodach Pomorza Zachodniego Część Połudnowa i Zachodnia rok 1974? I zwłaszcza "Atlas Polskich Rzek"? Nie możemy kopiować z innych map, poza niewielkimi wyjątkami commented 2025-10-29 09:55:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173918652 (Comments: 1) | WKB69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Het cafe stond al vermeld in OSM. Alle info heb ik nu samengevoegd in de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-29 09:54:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173898748 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 09:53:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173861164 (Comments: 1) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 130) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13264075032. Is this really a description or rather a reference number for administrative classification? commented 2025-10-29 09:53:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 163765948 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered... commented 2025-10-29 09:38:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173916547 (Comments: 1) | nlogidzon68 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset appears to follow a pattern of vandalism similar to previous incidents affecting the same map elements, which were also reverted. I would therefore appreciate it if other members of the community could review this changeset as w... commented 2025-10-29 09:38:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173916616 (Comments: 1) | nlogidzon68 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset appears to follow a pattern of vandalism similar to previous incidents affecting the same map elements, which were also reverted. I would therefore appreciate it if other members of the community could review this changeset as w... commented 2025-10-29 09:37:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 165754924 (Comments: 2) | Raymond (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hier ein Vorschlag für das Tagging des Tunnels: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-29 09:24:33 UTC by hsimpson ♦142 |
| 167801045 (Comments: 4) | Zrop (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hab gerade gesehen, dass ich das an das falsche CS angehängt habe. Sorry dafür. commented 2025-10-29 09:21:31 UTC by hsimpson ♦142 |
| 173917963 (Comments: 2) | planetjane0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Cannabis dispensary in Ypsilanti Michigan" commented 2025-10-29 09:09:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173917048 (Comments: 1) | Alessandro Aldè (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao Alessandro Aldè, "DINAclub - Stazione di Ricarica e-Bike" è nome descrittivo. brand=Repower network=Dina club operator=Repower operator:wikidata=Q674712 website=https://www.repower.com/it commented 2025-10-29 09:07:49 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦318 |
 | 173857878 (Comments: 1) | Gianluck Pastor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Why did you overpaint a existing street? I remove your first change set. commented 2025-10-29 09:07:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173805698 (Comments: 3) | Traffikant (Discussed changesets: 6) | z.B. bei Taginfo nach dem richtigen Wort suchen und ähnliche Tags anzeigen lassen. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/separation#similar Dann einen auswählen und rechts oben auf Overpass Turbo klicken. commented 2025-10-29 09:03:22 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 173914915 (Comments: 7) | PWestenberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | .. access=private routeert niet.. want Verboden Toegang. .. access=customers routeert ook niet. .. access=permissive routeert wel. Het een tag voor Eigen Weg. De eigenaar kan iemand te allen tijde de toegang ontzeggen. De wegenverkeersw... commented 2025-10-29 08:57:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173879140 (Comments: 1) | NBMAnjoutourisme (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ça fait serré pour mettre trois restaurants dans ce bâtiment. Êtes-vous sûr(e) que ce restaurant ne replace pas plutôt l’un des deux déjà cartographiés ? commented 2025-10-29 08:50:54 UTC by Ltrlg ♦79 |
| 173914972 (Comments: 4) | PWestenberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Aan die afrastering (fence) hoef je niets te doen. Dat speelt geen rol in de routering. Dus geen accesstags toevoegen. Alleen aan de poorten (gate) zelf. commented 2025-10-29 08:37:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173915074 (Comments: 3) | PWestenberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oke.. maar het hek zit niet aan een wegdeel vast en zal dus niets doen. De weg op het parkeerterrein staat op access=private. Al die toegangrechten op het hek dat wel aan de weg vastzit hebben hier geen zin als de weg op private staat. MVG<... commented 2025-10-29 08:35:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173915016 (Comments: 1) | PWestenberg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag PWesternberg Dit is een kruispunt name\t\tHaven 3108 zal niets doen in OSM. MVG eggoie commented 2025-10-29 08:26:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173898679 (Comments: 7) | misterte (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo Manuel, natürlich hat dieser Eintrag an Bedeutung verloren. Das heißt aber umgekehrt nicht, dass "bridge:name=" völlig nutzlos ist. Ich komme aus der IT und arbeite täglich direkt mit OSM-Datenextrakten. Wenn i... commented 2025-10-29 08:26:02 UTC by hmkaiser ♦57 |
| 173206386 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916553 commented 2025-10-29 08:25:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463 |
| 173206283 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916553 commented 2025-10-29 08:25:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463 |
| 172768921 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916535 commented 2025-10-29 08:24:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463 |
| 172768882 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531 commented 2025-10-29 08:24:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463 |
| 172768863 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531 commented 2025-10-29 08:24:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463 |
| 172768876 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531 commented 2025-10-29 08:24:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463 |
| 173903911 (Comments: 1) | dobbie-nl-\ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-29 08:11:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173896333 (Comments: 1) | ThomasVijf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-29 08:09:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173773061 (Comments: 1) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 29) | Oye, ¿qué vas a hacer con todas esas carreteras sin señalizar? commented 2025-10-29 08:01:49 UTC by Sandal man ♦396 |
| 173830829 (Comments: 2) | GemBer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo eggie, er zat een typefout in de straatnaam. Deze is aangepast. Terugmelding is niet nodig. GemBer commented 2025-10-29 08:00:15 UTC by GemBer ♦3 |
| 173793563 (Comments: 1) | leobass (Discussed changesets: 14) | здравствуйте. Тут проект выложили https://roads.ru/forum/topic/29949-ulitsa-polyany-i-bartenevskaya-ul/?do=findComment&comment=867318 подумал, может, вам будет интересно обрис... commented 2025-10-29 07:54:34 UTC by literan ♦6,844 |
| 173864458 (Comments: 1) | nitin gatkar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gajanan Maharaj temple malkhed bk ner Yavatmal Maharashtra 445102 call 9699185141 commented 2025-10-29 07:52:28 UTC by nitin gatkar ♦1 |
| 173559178 (Comments: 1) | panzaeron (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin panzeron, bei Einbahnstraßen tragen wir nicht noch zusätzlich die Abbiegebschränkungen ein. Die ergeben sich bereits durch das oneway=yes. Wenn Du Zeichen 267 als Punkt direkt auf den highway einträgst, denke b... commented 2025-10-29 07:45:45 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦762 |
| 173885149 (Comments: 3) | informatique_geo4net (Discussed changesets: 1) | The prefecture de Casablanca is indeed made of 2 communes, Commune de Casablanca and Commune du Méchouar de Casablanca, so it’s correct! commented 2025-10-29 07:34:30 UTC by ilias_ ♦317 |
| 173881993 (Comments: 1) | PowerPan (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fiktiver Name wird zurückgesetzt. Änderungen dieser Art können in OpenGeofiction erfolgen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173914542 commented 2025-10-29 07:23:04 UTC by kmpoppe_repair ♦470 |
| 156032699 (Comments: 2) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, c'est parce qu'elle est coupé en deux relation, celle en state active et celle en state proposed. Si tu affiche les deux ensemble, tu voie l'itinéraire complet. la active : https://www.openstreetmap.org/rela... commented 2025-10-29 07:19:58 UTC by BardafFr ♦10 |
| 173833549 (Comments: 1) | 小阿喵喵 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please be careful about how to mark a bridge. There must be two nodes(节点) on two sides to separate(分割) the line if you want to make a bridge, or the whole routh will be a LONG bridge. Also be careful about how road intersections are made.... commented 2025-10-29 06:55:21 UTC by IAwAI ♦2 |
| 173831024 (Comments: 2) | MacDony (Discussed changesets: 34) | Bonjour Marc, Je corrige principalement la géométrie des segments de route, l'ajout ou le retrait de segments. Je ne connais pas l'édition des Bus. J'ai ajouté, comme je pensais, ces relations pour ... commented 2025-10-29 06:55:00 UTC by MacDony ♦28 |
| 173908996 (Comments: 1) | shreyagandi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6481173570 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-10-29 06:52:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173911560 (Comments: 1) | Raven Scales (Discussed changesets: 7) | #tt_event commented 2025-10-29 06:52:24 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6 |
| 173911571 (Comments: 1) | Raven Scales (Discussed changesets: 7) | #tt_event commented 2025-10-29 06:52:08 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6 |
| 173911580 (Comments: 1) | Raven Scales (Discussed changesets: 7) | #tt_event commented 2025-10-29 06:51:53 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6 |
| 173911591 (Comments: 1) | Raven Scales (Discussed changesets: 7) | #tt_event commented 2025-10-29 06:51:39 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6 |
| 173911602 (Comments: 1) | Raven Scales (Discussed changesets: 7) | #tt_event commented 2025-10-29 06:51:10 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6 |
| 173911633 (Comments: 1) | Raven Scales (Discussed changesets: 7) | #tt_event commented 2025-10-29 06:50:42 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6 |
| 173909103 (Comments: 1) | william619 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please refrain from adding private information to OSM and thereby engaging in vandalism. If you want to make meaningful additions, please read the wiki article on addresses https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Addresses and enter them in your a... commented 2025-10-29 06:35:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173885463 (Comments: 3) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 325) | Hab die Verbindung 16-17 repariert. Beim Teilen eines ways scheint die Relation 16-17 verloren gegangen zu sein. commented 2025-10-29 06:35:28 UTC by geozeisig ♦229 |
| 173878703 (Comments: 2) | aTarom (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello, could you please review my edit? I removed only the spaces because the phone number started with “+ 34…” and that space between the “+” and the “34” is not correct, so I just fixed that and check the ... commented 2025-10-29 06:30:45 UTC by aTarom ♦824 |
 | 172959196 (Comments: 5) | Вальдимар (Discussed changesets: 126) | Hi. No, unfortunately I don't have any images commented 2025-10-29 06:19:53 UTC by Вальдимар ♦12 |
| 172516538 (Comments: 3) | civ41 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Secondo me è meglio aggiungere note=* sulla strada e numeri civici, così se qualcuno passa non l'ho cambia secondo la scritta sul cartello. commented 2025-10-29 06:19:50 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦318 |
| 173909073 (Comments: 1) | william619 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-10-29 06:19:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 172903227 (Comments: 1) | ElmerOSM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know. commented 2025-10-29 06:11:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 116960939 (Comments: 1) | Ramesh kumar TN (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know. commented 2025-10-29 06:06:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 123555068 (Comments: 1) | QASIM_KAZMI (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know. commented 2025-10-29 06:06:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
 | 173357077 (Comments: 1) | kaykhine (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for mapping. I noticed you added many villages. It's worth noting that if a village has fewer than 30-40 households, it should be tagged as a hamlet. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=hamlet) commented 2025-10-29 05:46:27 UTC by DetectiveConan ♦15 |
| 173472648 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 05:07:06 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173472409 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 05:05:34 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173474708 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 04:38:02 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173477259 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 04:22:13 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173473421 (Comments: 3) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 04:19:57 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
 | 173472967 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-29 04:14:41 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173909172 (Comments: 1) | TornadoKegan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, why did you delete the buildings rather than updating the geometry of the building? commented 2025-10-29 04:12:51 UTC by QuiLe ♦2 |
| 172437773 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 04:03:38 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173602916 (Comments: 2) | Jessica Irvine (Discussed changesets: 1) | When mapping building footprints consider that you are looking at the roofs which may have stains making it appear as thogh their shape is different. commented 2025-10-29 03:59:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173804173 (Comments: 1) | Lauragzf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:56:18 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 172948409 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 03:53:15 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 171037983 (Comments: 1) | KennethArthur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:52:16 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 171998079 (Comments: 1) | Magar Sushma (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:51:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173861963 (Comments: 1) | TriangleMaple (Discussed changesets: 7) | Additional sources alongside the survey: https://burnaby.widen.net/s/mmjwrxv6pm/metrotown-downtown-plan Map on page 49/165 of the pdf, If you count the numbers on the bottom of the pdf, it's page 37 Land is marked for open-s... commented 2025-10-29 03:50:36 UTC by TriangleMaple ♦4 |
| 172713218 (Comments: 1) | Hung159 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, I want to tell you something about your edits on bridges and tunnels. I saw you've changed 'name' tag to bridge or tunnel's name. However, some of your edits were not seemed to be appropriate. Because the 'highw... commented 2025-10-29 03:50:36 UTC by aaei924 ♦28 |
| 173675583 (Comments: 1) | NataliaM2101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:50:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173585383 (Comments: 1) | dusziv (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, I appreciate you improving the geometry of a few of the buildings here, but the middle footprint appears to envelope multiple buildings, the rightmost feature looks to be a field, the layer tag was not removed from the smallest building, and the ... commented 2025-10-29 03:47:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173704166 (Comments: 2) | ElmerOSM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, thanks for moving the footprint you added to try and place it at the base of the building though it should have been moved slightly further north and east to achieve this. You correctly recognised and deleted roof furniture, but the building foot... commented 2025-10-29 03:43:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 158725253 (Comments: 2) | radiotrefoil (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hi, sorry if it wasn't clear, the fixme tag is a request to add a missing ref. NBN nodes usually have a ref like "2KTB-03-05-FNO-001" or so. Needs to be surveyed in person commented 2025-10-29 03:37:41 UTC by radiotrefoil ♦115 |
| 173257307 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-29 03:31:16 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173579355 (Comments: 1) | Amy Armstrong (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:24:25 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173667408 (Comments: 1) | !auge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:23:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173691730 (Comments: 1) | Sam Bedekar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:23:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173720467 (Comments: 1) | amaechijac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:22:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173563756 (Comments: 1) | Rubi Shrestha (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:21:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173765585 (Comments: 1) | Puntertje (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag to resolve data overlaps here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand the use of this tag. commented 2025-10-29 03:20:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173667887 (Comments: 1) | Juan Carlos Gonzalez Aguilar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand the tag. commented 2025-10-29 03:15:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 171711623 (Comments: 1) | biscuits_n_jam (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, it looks like you added an invlaid layer tag here please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand this tag. commented 2025-10-29 03:13:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173610105 (Comments: 1) | CollinsNdegwa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you inappropriately added a layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. commented 2025-10-29 03:11:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 172510100 (Comments: 1) | Andreea Tulvan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to understand the use of the layer tag. commented 2025-10-29 03:07:11 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173163856 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 03:04:22 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173679014 (Comments: 1) | Adeel B (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you identified buildings in imagery, but didn't map them as accuratlely as the imagery allows. Just so you know it is unnecessary to add an area tag to building footprints as that is assumed to be the case. Layer tags are mostc... commented 2025-10-29 03:04:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173860917 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hola J00SECI, ¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios? Quiero hacer la o... commented 2025-10-29 02:46:09 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦114 |
| 173861062 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hola J00SECI, ¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios? Quiero hacer la o... commented 2025-10-29 02:45:50 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦114 |
| 173861369 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hola J00SECI, ¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios? Quiero hacer la o... commented 2025-10-29 02:45:24 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦114 |
| 173882832 (Comments: 1) | @Muneebafzal (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003899336/history/29). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/change... commented 2025-10-29 01:15:39 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64 |
| 173905621 (Comments: 2) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thank you, I dedicate my work to my loyal fans, all (0) 235 of them commented 2025-10-29 01:12:33 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦108 |
 | 173892734 (Comments: 2) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 81) | building:part=yes commented 2025-10-29 00:47:51 UTC by Anrijs Terauds ♦50 |
| 173906216 (Comments: 1) | TheRandomGamrTRG (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-cornwall-on-open-data/136048 commented 2025-10-29 00:38:41 UTC by TheRandomGamrTRG ♦2 |
| 173906212 (Comments: 1) | TheRandomGamrTRG (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-cornwall-on-open-data/136048 commented 2025-10-29 00:38:25 UTC by TheRandomGamrTRG ♦2 |
| 173880637 (Comments: 2) | bryanf__ (Discussed changesets: 6) | because of this I've reverted this change. commented 2025-10-28 23:53:40 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 171387250 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 73) | What was your motivation to change the tracks between Bonifatiuskirche and Käfertal Bahnhof from railway=narrow_gauge to railway=tram? Having this inconsistent between both tracks of the same operational line doesn't make sense. This is als... commented 2025-10-28 23:45:05 UTC by networkException ♦1 |
| 173881961 (Comments: 1) | bryanf__ (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've reverted this changeset since the history of the original way should have been retained https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history It's likely that the water tank is sitting under the eaves and the buildi... commented 2025-10-28 23:40:56 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173882115 (Comments: 1) | bryanf__ (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've reverted this change since the history of the way should have been retained per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history (ie. instead of deleting the building and adding a new one, you could just edit the ex... commented 2025-10-28 23:33:01 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173903520 (Comments: 2) | Ol'Dirty (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18878 commented 2025-10-28 23:13:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029 |
| 173904993 (Comments: 1) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 173) | Участок будет только от МКАД до монастыря, а не как нарисовано сейчас. Проектный вариант - мастабный, с развязками, вернул на карте в преж... commented 2025-10-28 22:53:37 UTC by neo-plan ♦104 |
| 173841679 (Comments: 3) | 最好的智乃酱 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 若使用iD编辑器绘图，选中铁路轨道线段，在左侧“编辑要素”栏中向下滑动，展开“标签”。你会看到一张表格，其中既有的"maxspeed"值会与上方填写的“限制速度&rdq... commented 2025-10-28 22:49:35 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦16 |
| 173895726 (Comments: 1) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 71) | Please try and use descriptive changeset comments and avoid acronyms and made up words. OSM is a multilingual project, it is mean to exclude people based on their heritage. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-10-28 22:36:34 UTC by EqualBoat1886 ♦5 |
| 173877282 (Comments: 1) | pan_borsuk (Discussed changesets: 72) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445740144 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-10-28 22:33:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173881862 (Comments: 8) | czecko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-28 22:33:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 114577565 (Comments: 2) | ortho_is_hot (Discussed changesets: 53) | ? Looks like you might be correct.. must be somewhat confusing Been putting 686 back into sequential order... commented 2025-10-28 22:31:00 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,679 |
| 173893629 (Comments: 1) | bohbrat (Discussed changesets: 1) | The "Q" key in the web editor can square those corners for you. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173893629 commented 2025-10-28 21:48:27 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173898759 (Comments: 3) | adrgru (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ja, mit diesem "Problem" mussten wir uns im Rahmen unseres Parkraumprojekts schon sehr oft auseinandersetzen, da diese Art von informellem Parken in den Berliner Außenbezirken ein sehr häufiges Phänomen ist... Und die Rechts... commented 2025-10-28 21:36:25 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦426 |
| 173903100 (Comments: 1) | Higashimado (Discussed changesets: 4) | 根据2025年新增的导流线标识，自强大道转盘附近不再允许掉头 commented 2025-10-28 21:29:24 UTC by Higashimado ♦5 |
| 173903042 (Comments: 1) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 35) | Obszar jest taki duży ze względu na to, że zaktualizowałem tagi LK131 do operator=PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. (tak, jak ode mnie wymagano) commented 2025-10-28 21:27:07 UTC by RafaBoski ♦12 |
| 171027949 (Comments: 1) | GladGrip (Discussed changesets: 4) | You've added "branch=York Station Loc" to the Sainsbos here but that's clearly rubbish due to data corruption in whatever fed their website at their end! commented 2025-10-28 21:24:31 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 173534457 (Comments: 1) | GladGrip (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, You've moved the tags for "The Range" from the wider area to the building, but the forgets that the garden centre to the south is also part of the shop. To fix it it's probably easiest just to revert your edit. Best ... commented 2025-10-28 21:19:38 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 173381448 (Comments: 2) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo, ich habe die gelöschten Elemente wieder hergestellt. @Openminded320: Bitte achte beim Mappen darauf, keine Dinge zu löschen, von denen du nicht sicher weißt, dass sie nicht mehr existieren. Falls du Objekte... commented 2025-10-28 21:15:12 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦426 |
| 173711856 (Comments: 1) | GladGrip (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, You've updated the brand and brand:wikidata on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3270271462/history from "Go Outdoors Express" to "Go Outdoors". This is definitely a "Go Outdoors Express" not a "Go ... commented 2025-10-28 21:12:10 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 173884183 (Comments: 1) | bryanf__ (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've restored the deleted building and fixed the intersection. commented 2025-10-28 21:05:11 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173826743 (Comments: 3) | pawel66031 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Można dać tag `change=no`, który zabrania zmiany pasa ruchu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change Można od biedy zmapować obszar `area:highway=emergency`, który nie będzie się renderował i w zasadzie za wiele n... commented 2025-10-28 21:01:27 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158 |
| 173899275 (Comments: 1) | Ol'Dirty (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, This changeset has been identified as vandalism and has subsequently been reverted. Please refer to the following wiki page on trails: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F Thank you commented 2025-10-28 20:59:44 UTC by eerib ♦207 |
| 173901744 (Comments: 1) | Ol'Dirty (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, This changeset has been identified as vandalism and has subsequently been reverted. Please refer to the following wiki page on trails: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F Thank you commented 2025-10-28 20:59:33 UTC by eerib ♦207 |
| 173173103 (Comments: 6) | Mario26mario (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zmiana została wycofana, niestety zbyt dużo błędów. commented 2025-10-28 20:57:13 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158 |
| 173845214 (Comments: 2) | Boske Barber Shop Rzeszów (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wróć, do osobnego punktu miało być commented 2025-10-28 20:56:39 UTC by bartgron ♦300 |
| 173844518 (Comments: 1) | Irina_ch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Please use the Square tool (right-click -> Square or press Q) to draw orthogonal shapes, I don't think those houses don't have 90 degree corners. commented 2025-10-28 20:52:33 UTC by Buraddo ♦156 |
| 173886095 (Comments: 2) | Breezy50505 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer commented 2025-10-28 20:48:19 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173894126 (Comments: 1) | Omni Vigore (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi :) freut mich, dass du so schnell auf meine Anmerkung reagierst. Der Standort der Eiche sieht ganz gut aus, aber wenn ich hier gucke https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/3673911181 dann müsstest du nochmal an die Eige... commented 2025-10-28 20:47:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 173901166 (Comments: 1) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 165) | Ошибка в комментарии к пакету Род изменен наоборот с Cerasus на Prunus commented 2025-10-28 20:44:29 UTC by solenoid jam ♦183 |
| 173882960 (Comments: 3) | keichwa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :) Wenn es der gleiche Raum ist, dann übernehmen wir den Punkt (node) für das neue Geschäft. Einfach die aktuellen Eigenschaften an den vorhandenen Punkt. Die Geschichte des Gesch&aum... commented 2025-10-28 20:41:36 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 173886375 (Comments: 6) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 125) | spoko, został mi odcinek na zachód od Leśnic do Słupska i za Słupskiem commented 2025-10-28 20:34:01 UTC by theDM ♦142 |
| 173899625 (Comments: 1) | PW1996 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag PW.. Probeer als het kan bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Nu krijg je dubbele adressen. Mvg.. eggie commented 2025-10-28 20:32:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173756509 (Comments: 3) | Walter Łuszczyk (Discussed changesets: 8) | Pytaj na forum - tam są specjaliści od takich tematów. commented 2025-10-28 20:30:01 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173896943 (Comments: 2) | groen_sb (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, dank voor de reactie. Bij buurt- en dorpshuizen zie je wel vaker meervoudig gebruik in multifunctionele accommodaties, vandaar de dubbele tag. Blijkbaar heeft dit gebouw niet (meer) de functie van ontmoetingsplek. Ik ben lokaal niet bekend dus za... commented 2025-10-28 20:29:34 UTC by groen_sb ♦2 |
| 173892071 (Comments: 1) | SteMue (Discussed changesets: 11) | Stimmt cycleway:both? Die letzten Mapillary-Bilder von Juni 2025 zeigen nur eine Radspur Richtung Norden. commented 2025-10-28 20:29:32 UTC by eserte ♦157 |
| 173894387 (Comments: 1) | Playtri St Petersburg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-10-28 20:25:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173894752 (Comments: 1) | AbbyZzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You changed a fottway to a bench (see https://www.osm.org/way/557849061). I must reverted your change set. Please try it again. commented 2025-10-28 20:22:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 37319809 (Comments: 1) | gelltap (Discussed changesets: 4) | Szent István-szoborra milyen forrásból lett artist_name=Raffay Béla? commented 2025-10-28 20:20:10 UTC by ha5vsa ♦4 |
| 173898411 (Comments: 1) | Join Poland (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap to nie miejsce na tekst reklamowy. Usuwam i zgłaszam. commented 2025-10-28 20:20:08 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦402 |
| 173900601 (Comments: 3) | Bamgoodies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ta description pourrait être : « entreprise d'impression et broderie sur textile à Riaz » --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-10-28 20:15:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173898476 (Comments: 1) | jamesbmc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please add the new information to the park area instead of adding an additional point to the park. commented 2025-10-28 20:15:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173843795 (Comments: 1) | Mitzuc22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't use the name tag for descriptions, it should be used only for proper names commented 2025-10-28 20:14:42 UTC by Buraddo ♦156 |
| 173844526 (Comments: 1) | Suba Sabina (Discussed changesets: 2) | the name tag should be used only for proper names, not for descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173844526 commented 2025-10-28 20:13:01 UTC by Buraddo ♦156 |
| 173844032 (Comments: 1) | Suba Sabina (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, please be careful, you moved by mistake a node and merged it with a nearby road, see https://osmcha.org/changesets/173844032 for a visual representation of your edit. This can happen if you scroll around the map by mistake. I fixed your ... commented 2025-10-28 20:11:21 UTC by Buraddo ♦156 |
| 170864205 (Comments: 10) | parukhin (Discussed changesets: 43) | Откатил, те, которые переименовал https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173900246 commented 2025-10-28 20:03:40 UTC by parukhin ♦156 |
| 173888497 (Comments: 1) | gabriel197 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please be careful, you moved by mistake a road, see https://osmcha.org/changesets/173888497 for a visual representation of your edit I reverted your changeset commented 2025-10-28 20:00:49 UTC by Buraddo ♦156 |
| 173888315 (Comments: 1) | Flavius19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Please use the Square tool (right-click -> Square or press Q) to draw orthogonal shapes, I don't think those houses don't have 90 degree corners. There is also a fork of the default editor which uses AI to draw buildings, yo... commented 2025-10-28 19:59:11 UTC by Buraddo ♦156 |
| 173888036 (Comments: 1) | karolinaflorczyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173900138 commented 2025-10-28 19:58:56 UTC by bartgron ♦300 |
| 173888268 (Comments: 2) | DACIANZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Btw, there is a fork of the default editor which uses AI to draw buildings, you can give this tool to your class and make a much faster job: rapideditor.org commented 2025-10-28 19:57:20 UTC by Buraddo ♦156 |
| 173852691 (Comments: 1) | LuGo91 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the 2 areas mapped here are not horse riding centres (leisure=horse_riding), they are horse riding arenas and should be tagged like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223815764 (pitch + equestrian). The horse riding centre here is probably ... commented 2025-10-28 19:56:14 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦835 |
| 173888267 (Comments: 1) | m_to (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please be careful, you moved by mistake a road, see https://osmcha.org/changesets/173888267 for a visual representation of your edit I reverted your changeset commented 2025-10-28 19:45:39 UTC by Buraddo ♦156 |
| 173892390 (Comments: 2) | anonymous123123 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! I understand your point and you are absolutely right. Highways or dual carriageways should have the same name in both directions for consistency, as that’s the standard in OSM. There is no need to assign different names. I have also correct... commented 2025-10-28 19:38:05 UTC by anonymous123123 ♦3 |
| 170457331 (Comments: 1) | Redprintblueprint (Discussed changesets: 1) | u are a bad person fuck u commented 2025-10-28 19:36:09 UTC by CowCowManThingit ♦1 |
| 173898286 (Comments: 1) | Ezra Edwards (Discussed changesets: 7) | nice work updating the road network in kpk — it’s great to see live geodata enhancements at work. this kind of map edit powers smarter routing and better location-based services for developers and users alike. for more digital tools and m... commented 2025-10-28 19:31:21 UTC by Nandre Burger ♦1 |
| 173794058 (Comments: 2) | Idris Nazh (Discussed changesets: 1) | 3. При переименовании улицы нужно менять не только name, но и name:ru. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781717815 Ошибки с отсутствием статусной части продол... commented 2025-10-28 19:29:53 UTC by Grass-snake ♦245 |
| 173624315 (Comments: 1) | mmorec (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello mmorec, I see you have reclassified Avenida Regimiento 13 de Caballería and the other main roads in Toay to primary. I would like to point out that according to OSM policy(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary)... commented 2025-10-28 19:23:06 UTC by Aralqum ♦11 |
| 173891616 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 156) | merci!!! je me doutais bien que c'était possible. commented 2025-10-28 19:16:56 UTC by benoitdd ♦80 |
| 173883261 (Comments: 1) | Kako00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | این مسیر یک جاده روستایی فرعیه و تگ "highway=unclassified" براش مناسب تره، لطفا آگاهانه و براساس واقعیت داده های نقشه رو ویرایش یا تکمیل کنید commented 2025-10-28 19:15:10 UTC by AhmadHB ♦8 |
| 173892967 (Comments: 1) | anonymous123123 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Salut. De unde ai invetat tu numele pus invers la autostrada A1 Pitesti-Bucuresti? Atata vreme cat OFICIAl este Autostrada Bucuresti-Pitesti? Asa doar ca sa iasa o cacialma cand cautam pe gps ? commented 2025-10-28 18:52:53 UTC by rarad74 ♦309 |
| 173894288 (Comments: 1) | KORAYREİS (Discussed changesets: 7) | OpenStreetMap'te rules=* etiketi yok, eklediğiniz bilgileri eklemek için halihazırda başka etiketler var. "Yol boyunca duraklamak ve park etmek yasak" bilgisini nasıl ekleyebileceğiniz şurada anlatılmış: https://wiki.op... commented 2025-10-28 18:34:22 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| 173876870 (Comments: 2) | Linie29 (Discussed changesets: 74) | Das ist ein bisschen tricky weil es hier "Guntramsdorf-Kaiserau" und "Guntramsdorf-Kaiserau Haltestelle" gibt die auch unterschiedliche Betriebsstellenkürzel haben aber die selbe IBNR-Nummer. Wenn man da ganz genau ist mü... commented 2025-10-28 18:25:06 UTC by Linie29 ♦43 |
| 82171642 (Comments: 2) | kapazao (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hola Dani, es correcto lo que comentas y he procedido a corregir tanto el tipo de central como la producción. Estos datos fueron obtenidos de la Agencia Andaluza de la Energía como indiqué en el conjunto de cambios. No sé ... commented 2025-10-28 18:18:11 UTC by kapazao ♦935 |
| 173873443 (Comments: 1) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola jorafa, Veo que para dibujar un muro, estás utilizando la etiqueta de "edificio" (building=yes), pero no es correcta. Existe una etiqueta correcta para los muros: barrier=wall (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/T... commented 2025-10-28 18:16:08 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,694 |
| 173895375 (Comments: 1) | KORAYREİS (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merhaba. Tarafınıza bu konuda daha önce özel mesaj da gönderdim. Changeset'lerinize yorum da yazdım. Tüm değişikliklerinize "GERÇEK YER EKLENDİ" yazıyorsunuz. Lütfen changeset yorumlarınızda ne ... commented 2025-10-28 18:14:58 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| 173875167 (Comments: 1) | Rubenke (Discussed changesets: 72) | Het label "bus=yes" op een highway betekent dat een bus er mag rijden. Het perron is echter bedoeld voor passagiers. commented 2025-10-28 18:13:10 UTC by goedegazelle ♦244 |
| X | 173893449 (Comments: 1) | blauloke (Discussed changesets: 22) | please keep changesets to one continent commented 2025-10-28 18:06:16 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| 173031037 (Comments: 2) | Higashimado (Discussed changesets: 4) | 您好，已根据《广东省普通国道“十四五”规划建设项目示意图》修改，谢谢提醒 commented 2025-10-28 18:03:47 UTC by Higashimado ♦5 |
| 173885187 (Comments: 1) | alexpharrison (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello welcome to OSM. I wanted to to let you know, a feature being on private property is not a valid reason to remove it. If it exists on the ground it can be include in OSM. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism. The ... commented 2025-10-28 18:02:38 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173887792 (Comments: 3) | WalkerB (Discussed changesets: 6) | The issue is that you had 3 nodes in North America, and one in SE Asia commented 2025-10-28 17:45:18 UTC by jjyach ♦35 |
| 173846244 (Comments: 2) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 162) | Ah okay, perfekt, dank dir commented 2025-10-28 17:44:27 UTC by DeFra85 ♦260 |
| 173862950 (Comments: 4) | rpoulsen47 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice! Thanks for finding that! commented 2025-10-28 17:42:21 UTC by rpoulsen47 ♦1 |
| 173884879 (Comments: 1) | Blurry Kitteh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi welcome to OSM. Looks like you are removing private roads. This is not correct. Private roads are valid to be mapped in OSM and should not be removed. The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or a... commented 2025-10-28 17:35:33 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173885381 (Comments: 1) | Blurry Kitteh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi welcome to OSM. Looks like you are removing private roads. This is not correct. Private roads are valid to be mapped in OSM and should not be removed. The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or a... commented 2025-10-28 17:35:22 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173625388 (Comments: 7) | Endres Pelka (Discussed changesets: 54) | dzięki @Spin za ten fix. Ogólnie zastanawiam się na ile ewidencyjnie wiarygodne są te granice, ale to juz pytanie do ich autora wprowadzenia, no chyba, że się kiedys sami dowiemy. commented 2025-10-28 17:17:30 UTC by Yog Sot ♦327 |
| 173887104 (Comments: 2) | ConnorGa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Ion, There's no wear pattern or anything indicating the existence of a footpath, informal or not, and pretty much all grass is traversable. I'm not sure what you mean from a routing perspective, but I think the priority should be... commented 2025-10-28 17:16:44 UTC by ConnorGa ♦2 |
| 157308968 (Comments: 2) | TheBestIdea (Discussed changesets: 70) | Exclusively for bikes. It is very similar to way 1217875370 (except is has a concrete island instead of a painted one). commented 2025-10-28 17:15:27 UTC by TheBestIdea ♦115 |
| 173890953 (Comments: 1) | ahapen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Toastable staat al in OSM. Wijziging teruggedraaid. commented 2025-10-28 16:49:01 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018 |
| 173883819 (Comments: 2) | keichwa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ja, ich war vor Ort. Danke fuer den Hinweis! commented 2025-10-28 16:47:25 UTC by keichwa ♦3 |
| 173856687 (Comments: 2) | Alexander Avtanski (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks! Fixed that. commented 2025-10-28 16:40:38 UTC by Alexander Avtanski ♦3 |
| 140397458 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 551) | confirmed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3854000 commented 2025-10-28 16:38:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173826696 (Comments: 7) | DamianKosa (Discussed changesets: 1) | o to dzięki za info! w takim razie to wielkie dzięki za przekazanie informacji, jest teraz w pełni OK i zapraszam do dalszych edycji mam nadzieję że będzie mniej pytań co do nich :) commented 2025-10-28 16:37:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173892015 (Comments: 2) | Ryan Vuong (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Luggage storage near Hue Railway Station" commented 2025-10-28 16:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
 | 173780255 (Comments: 3) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 3) | There's no problem! You will learn from mistakes eventually. commented 2025-10-28 16:27:07 UTC by Donut Master 🍩 ♦23 |
| 173890823 (Comments: 1) | Michael Glatz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Heidenheimer Straße 79 wurde abgerissen. commented 2025-10-28 16:09:43 UTC by Michael Glatz ♦1 |
| 173876005 (Comments: 1) | Scazzamureddhu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not create extra address points. Addresses in Belgium are computed automatically and we prefer not to have to manage duplicates on POI. We fixed your edit, as well as the previous one. commented 2025-10-28 15:50:36 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 173862740 (Comments: 1) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted in 173889527 due to possible incompatible license commented 2025-10-28 15:47:26 UTC by hahae ♦9 |
| 173715973 (Comments: 1) | midget sub (Discussed changesets: 8) | I think highway=path might have been correct, according to the wiki "Paths kept mainly by people repeatedly walking on them, or those that are only minimally constructed, are usually tagged as highway=path" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-28 15:46:19 UTC by jm428 ♦19 |
| 173857989 (Comments: 1) | Omni Vigore (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten. Dein erster POI sieht schon nicht schlecht aus. Ich hätte Anmerkungen zu deiner Änderung: - Bei RundumBaum: &... commented 2025-10-28 15:40:16 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 173887990 (Comments: 2) | trailschneck (Discussed changesets: 58) | Keine Ursache. Nächstes mal schau ich mir die beiden Notes am Schloss Waldthausen an. Das war mir heute etwas zu weit - da krieg ich Ärger mit meiner Frau. ;-) commented 2025-10-28 15:36:55 UTC by trailschneck ♦48 |
| 173881362 (Comments: 1) | ALzBln (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adressnamen werden in OSM übrigens i.d.R. nicht abgekürzt, insbesondere, weil man mit SC ja auch Straßen antippen kann, um die Straße einer Adresse zu setzen. commented 2025-10-28 15:32:49 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦232 |
| 171166898 (Comments: 1) | srbije (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted as vandalism: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173889289 commented 2025-10-28 15:32:19 UTC by anshanin ♦22 |
| 173846205 (Comments: 2) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 120) | Już poprawiłem. Dziękuje commented 2025-10-28 15:27:21 UTC by Adam Haba ♦27 |
| 173738724 (Comments: 1) | TBD0320 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A few issues. First, solve the issues shown by the issue triangle of IDeditor before you upload your work. Your mappings are not that accurate as we might expect. Buildings not squared. Building nodes connected to... commented 2025-10-28 15:21:31 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| 169301144 (Comments: 1) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, es-tu sûr du numéro siret de MLK bâtiment, cf. la note que j'ai rajoutée sur le point et sa source Cordialement commented 2025-10-28 15:11:47 UTC by Yunan973 ♦79 |
 | 173888258 (Comments: 1) | Hnidko2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | #mapbox_editing Geometry was fixed according to Bing Maps Aerial commented 2025-10-28 15:09:03 UTC by Hnidko2 ♦2 |
| 173845245 (Comments: 1) | ZebraLisa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao Lisa Hier hast du die Zebrabox-Webseitenadresse auf den Eingang gelegt. Ich habe die Adresse in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173887399 wieder entfernt. Gruss, habi commented 2025-10-28 14:45:55 UTC by habi ♦1,938 |
| 173844868 (Comments: 1) | ZebraLisa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao Lisa Hier ist der Zebrabox-Standort zwei Mal erfasst, was nicht Sinn macht. Einmal als shop=storage_rental bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13261738537 und einmal ebenso bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923438600 Ebenso macht... commented 2025-10-28 14:39:25 UTC by habi ♦1,938 |
| 173839887 (Comments: 1) | ZebraLisa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao Lisa Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Du hast hier (und in allen deinen anderen Änderungen) den Zebraboxen einen `building`-Wert vergeben. Sofe... commented 2025-10-28 14:30:32 UTC by habi ♦1,938 |
| 173886314 (Comments: 1) | Yuliya Petrash (Discussed changesets: 1) | I forgot to add the source that i'n using "Bing Maps Aerial" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173886314 commented 2025-10-28 14:29:38 UTC by Yuliya Petrash ♦1 |
| 173858766 (Comments: 1) | Căprar Andrei (Discussed changesets: 5) | source: survey commented 2025-10-28 14:28:41 UTC by Căprar Andrei ♦4 |
| 168664071 (Comments: 2) | Fabian1429 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hey, ja okay. Wir hatten die Diskussion an anderer Stelle schonmal und abgeschlossen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172410363#map=16/52.37121/13.42237 Grüße commented 2025-10-28 14:20:19 UTC by Fabian1429 ♦28 |
 | 173885824 (Comments: 1) | Hnidko2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | #mapbox_editing Geometry was fixed according to Esri World Imagery commented 2025-10-28 14:18:19 UTC by Hnidko2 ♦2 |
| 173690086 (Comments: 2) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 40) | W porządku, dzięki za informację, zmieniam landuse na brownfield w takim razie. commented 2025-10-28 14:14:25 UTC by YacoobPL ♦29 |
| 173688530 (Comments: 4) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 40) | Okej, dzięki ;) commented 2025-10-28 14:13:54 UTC by YacoobPL ♦29 |
| 173874845 (Comments: 2) | RonaldM011 (Discussed changesets: 6) | CTRL-f5 voor het effect commented 2025-10-28 14:13:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173882699 (Comments: 3) | Michiel van der Meer (real) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Geen idee. In OSM stond het al goed, want op layers die nog wachten op hun update stond het stukje gewoon ingetekend. Bij een revert van mij (niet opgeslagen) klopte het ook. Het was wel een lijnelement, maar dat hoeft geen bezwaar te zijn. <... commented 2025-10-28 14:11:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173871832 (Comments: 1) | wouterko (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dit ging niet zoals gehoopt en heb ik gerevert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173872927 commented 2025-10-28 14:09:21 UTC by wouterko ♦3 |
| 173881713 (Comments: 1) | Татьяна Тюкова (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не дублируйте точки. Карты в Maps.me обновляются в течение месяца commented 2025-10-28 14:06:05 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 173878813 (Comments: 1) | mcast (Discussed changesets: 1) | New building (since satellite imagery) is not drawn commented 2025-10-28 13:59:51 UTC by mcast ♦1 |
| 173848853 (Comments: 1) | Soccer's dumb 6 7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the bridge literally named "Cool Bridge"? If not, then the name=* tag isn't the right tag for that. description=* would be better in that case, though describing why it's cool would be ideal. --- ... commented 2025-10-28 13:57:05 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 172441536 (Comments: 1) | Soph4Future (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thank you for mapping on this project. Please tag buildings as building=yes because that is standard for OSM tagging of building. From the Imagery we cannot see what the purpose is of a building. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-10-28 13:53:29 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| X | 173849391 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Could you please limit changesets to a single geographic area? Several of your changes have appeared on the recent changes for Oklahoma just because Oklahoma happened to be between two disparate areas you edited in the same changeset. ... commented 2025-10-28 13:50:59 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173883785 (Comments: 1) | RonaldM011 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance commented 2025-10-28 13:47:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173883955 (Comments: 1) | RonaldM011 (Discussed changesets: 6) | De ingangen maak je met een node vast aan de gebouwomtrek. entrance=yes en entrance=main https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance Het gebouw heeft geen layer=1 Een weg onder het gebouw of overkapping krijgt de tag covered=yes J... commented 2025-10-28 13:46:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173878600 (Comments: 1) | nathpass2002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. Did you have any more information for a natural = cave_entrance inside of a building? commented 2025-10-28 13:44:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 168413750 (Comments: 2) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 28) | Grüß Dich Martin, entschuldige bitte die späte Antwort. Die Aufnahmen habe ich von einer recht unbekannten Webseite gefunden. Zwischenzeitlich musste ich aber feststellen dass ein Teil der hinterlegten Aufnahmen von kommerziellen... commented 2025-10-28 13:43:32 UTC by LaLinea ♦13 |
| 173884150 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 163) | Identical road segmetns were split for no reason since the same truck restricion applies to both of them and there are signs on each end of the West 50th Street. Segments were merged back together in changeset 173884234 https://www.open... commented 2025-10-28 13:42:06 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178 |
| 167826075 (Comments: 3) | VA00 (Discussed changesets: 145) | Myślałem, że może mieszkasz gdzieś niedaleko lub coś wiesz od jakiegoś znajomego :/ commented 2025-10-28 13:40:12 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
| 173835910 (Comments: 1) | Gilbert Osullivan (Discussed changesets: 2) | User bas been blocked, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18874 commented 2025-10-28 13:36:41 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 169002132 (Comments: 2) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo martinst, der Fischerbrunnens ist wieder da wo er vorher schon war: https://osm.org/node/459038444 Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-28 13:36:09 UTC by LaLinea ♦13 |
| 173831180 (Comments: 1) | Gilbert Osullivan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173842316 commented 2025-10-28 13:36:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173709773 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | Skoro to dojazd na lotnisko, to dlaczego Awicenny nie jest secondary? Tak, to dojazd na autostradę, ale służący tylko ruchowi lokalnemu, bo dla tranzytu lepsza i szybsza droga jest przez A4 lub S8. Już kilka razy ta droga była pod... commented 2025-10-28 13:32:48 UTC by pavvv ♦561 |
| 173876948 (Comments: 6) | Ben van Laar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ha Eggie, Ik zie nu hoe je dat gedaan hebt! Bedankt hiervoor. Gr.Ben commented 2025-10-28 13:28:29 UTC by Ben van Laar ♦1 |
| 173883350 (Comments: 2) | Conaco02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aqui está um comentário de amostra com base nas suas edições do mapa: "Ajustados nós e vias" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted nodes and ways&... commented 2025-10-28 13:26:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 167153563 (Comments: 1) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 112) | Pozerám teraz na fixme pre uzol 12863150662 a tam je drôtený plot ale ľudia v ňom urobili dieru a chodia cez to. Keď budem mať cestu okolo tak to preverím ešte v akom je to stave teraz a či to náhodou aj ... commented 2025-10-28 13:17:39 UTC by EfreetSK ♦7 |
| 173753706 (Comments: 2) | cavamu (Discussed changesets: 1) | En este conjunto de cambios, han sido eliminados los elementos superpuestos. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173882682#map=16/41.49060/-5.68595 Por favor, revisa tus ediciones y consulta las dudas que te puedan surgir. Un saludo. commented 2025-10-28 13:09:12 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112 |
| 173877972 (Comments: 2) | Curni_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi Eggie, Dankjewel voor het kijken, ik heb net een nieuwe bewerking voorgesteld waar het terrein is gelabeld ipv de schuren. groet commented 2025-10-28 12:55:47 UTC by Curni_ ♦1 |
| 173876493 (Comments: 1) | Gustry (Discussed changesets: 5) | Formidable, merci pour la bonne contribution. commented 2025-10-28 12:45:28 UTC by sykul ♦67 |
| 173851205 (Comments: 3) | tvbrene (Discussed changesets: 19) | Selber erfinden ist aber schlecht, weil so keiner weiß was du damit genau meinst und Nutzer diesen Wert nicht erwarten commented 2025-10-28 12:43:36 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413 |
| 171596624 (Comments: 1) | na111 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183429367 really named "Undefined"? Other maps have a different name (which I won't copy of course) commented 2025-10-28 12:32:09 UTC by mtmail ♦157 |
| 173573601 (Comments: 1) | Jez Nicholson (Discussed changesets: 22) | Jez, per the wiki, addr:city is the postal city, which is Hove. commented 2025-10-28 12:24:23 UTC by Paul Flo Williams ♦7 |
| 169349298 (Comments: 1) | Brickelt963 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, le site web et la page facebook du resto la bohème ne fonctionnent plus, je les ai supprimés. Je ne sais pas si tu habites sur place (moi je suis en Guyane), mais il serait peut-être bien d'y aller voir pou... commented 2025-10-28 12:12:35 UTC by Yunan973 ♦79 |
| 173874423 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 109) | "...видяни по-рано обекти" трябваше да бъде. commented 2025-10-28 12:07:11 UTC by Fraxi ♦169 |
| 173874680 (Comments: 1) | RonaldM011 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Feedback...Lijkt me oke commented 2025-10-28 12:01:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173880020 (Comments: 1) | Ccwc Services (Tom Brophy) (Discussed changesets: 1) | There are units in E6, E6 appears to be the block commented 2025-10-28 11:54:24 UTC by Ccwc Services (Tom Brophy) ♦1 |
| 173875893 (Comments: 1) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 101) | Tonaż i jego `source:` zdaje się że też… ciekawe co jeszcze i gdzie jeszcze commented 2025-10-28 11:54:22 UTC by dzamper ♦157 |
| 173540955 (Comments: 1) | thefloh (Discussed changesets: 3) | hier haben sich mehrere inner-Flächen überschnitten, weshalb dieses Wald-MP ebenfalls defekt war commented 2025-10-28 11:52:10 UTC by Luzandro ♦946 |
| 173738643 (Comments: 1) | m0um3n (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci beaucoup commented 2025-10-28 11:46:18 UTC by Superadlen ♦172 |
| 173540285 (Comments: 2) | GKremp (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo Manuel, den "bridge:name" bei "man_made=bridge" war ein nicht beabsichtigter Fehler von mir, sorry. Aber zu den Fahrbahnen führt OSM-Wiki dazu aus: "Mit bridge:name=* wird der Name einer Brücke angegebe... commented 2025-10-28 11:45:32 UTC by GKremp ♦6 |
| 173533325 (Comments: 1) | thefloh (Discussed changesets: 3) | zwei der neuen bare_rock Flächen waren nicht geschlossen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5025969 commented 2025-10-28 11:33:47 UTC by Luzandro ♦946 |
| 173821684 (Comments: 2) | Kri_ttt (Discussed changesets: 37) | Thank you for bringing this up. I initially misunderstood the layout and thought the lower road allowed straight-through access. After reviewing it again, I realize that was an error on my part, and I’ve now corrected the tag accordingly. I app... commented 2025-10-28 11:07:24 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦14 |
| 173877841 (Comments: 1) | wies1 (Discussed changesets: 134) | Fehler bei source: Buildings and addresses GWR Swisstopo 2025 commented 2025-10-28 11:02:59 UTC by wies1 ♦169 |
| 167715399 (Comments: 2) | Wesley Alves (Discussed changesets: 2) | consertado commented 2025-10-28 11:00:16 UTC by erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,974 |
| 173877337 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 102) | Survey też był źródłem. Nie sprawdzałem dostępności dróg przed osiedlem (access=no to przesada), ale oczywista jest przejezdność do jego obsługi. commented 2025-10-28 10:51:13 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267 |
| 173848093 (Comments: 2) | archie (Discussed changesets: 288) | Vill du har vänligheten att inte föra in historiska objekt i osm, som inte - nu - längre existerar. Tack. commented 2025-10-28 10:49:10 UTC by archie ♦1,355 |
| 173876961 (Comments: 2) | lifelonghealth (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Health clinic in Clarendon Hills and Burr Ridge" commented 2025-10-28 10:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173722257 (Comments: 4) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 59) | Bueno, aunque haya corregido muchos, veo que en Osmose que sigue habiendo muchísimos más errores. Mira, solo de direcciones para Álava 😄: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#loc=9/42.917/-2.7448&level=1%2C2%2C3&cou... commented 2025-10-28 10:40:33 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦208 |
| 171241265 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 33) | leisure=track is incorrect, use highway=raceway instead. commented 2025-10-28 10:39:38 UTC by foreigner037 ♦66 |
| 173420790 (Comments: 1) | Tsur Halamish (Discussed changesets: 68) | שלום צור בבקשה לא לתת שם כמו בור מים, סוג הנקודה ברור מהתיוג. תודה commented 2025-10-28 10:37:32 UTC by hatul ♦410 |
| 172196512 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi, please avoid using planned and use proposed instead. Also, this is not how you tag such features. Use proposed:amenity=parking instead. commented 2025-10-28 10:37:02 UTC by foreigner037 ♦66 |
| 173876317 (Comments: 2) | sanprova (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Pest control services in Richmond VA" commented 2025-10-28 10:30:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173858214 (Comments: 1) | adelpedregal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones y bienvenido a la comunidad OSM Chile. Ojo por favor con realinear caminos. Lo hizo con las fotos bing, pero hay otros proveedores de fotos, todos con alineaciones un poco distintas. También están ... commented 2025-10-28 10:27:28 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173865519 (Comments: 2) | nxd (Discussed changesets: 1) | עוד כמה הערות: 1. הסימון הנכון הוא highway=path bicycle=designated כי cycleway מיועד לשביל אופניים עירוני. 2. לא צריך לתת שם לכל קטע ביחס הם יקבלו ... commented 2025-10-28 10:18:44 UTC by hatul ♦410 |
| 173875599 (Comments: 2) | Dead Simple Computing (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "IT services company in Reading" commented 2025-10-28 10:15:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173227350 (Comments: 2) | Chris Dekker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank je voor je bericht. Ik ben nieuw en we il graag een bijdrage leveren om in mijn wijk wandelpaden toe te voegen, die verschillende testen met elkaar verbonden. Dit was mijn eerste, om te kijken hoe precies werkt. Dank voor je correctie. Dat zal i... commented 2025-10-28 10:14:54 UTC by Chris Dekker ♦1 |
| 172492121 (Comments: 1) | Matthew Hostak (Discussed changesets: 39) | Ahoj, si si istý, že sa tu dá ubytovať? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22813214 commented 2025-10-28 10:08:49 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦35 |
| 172331261 (Comments: 5) | ljouglet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je viens d'annuler le changeset et j'ai bien récupéré les 3 relations..! https:// https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17998773#map=15/50.64460/3.11677&layers=CN https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19578144#map... commented 2025-10-28 10:08:07 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦179 |
| 173874890 (Comments: 2) | ayman tight (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added building with name "مركز شرطة العبيدي", height 3" commented 2025-10-28 10:06:51 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173851152 (Comments: 4) | kmpoppe (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ich hab die Gebäude nun an die amtlichen DOP20 angepasst. commented 2025-10-28 10:02:11 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413 |
| 171964471 (Comments: 2) | RV2001 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wieso haben Sie die Gleisgeometrie verändert und die Gleisverbindungen ab den Weichen 312/313 beim Römerhof neu als "Brücke" deklariert? Da dies von Ihnen nicht das erste changeset ist, welches uns als VBZ viele Tram Fahrwege... commented 2025-10-28 09:55:36 UTC by VBZ Balmer ♦2 |
| 173701681 (Comments: 3) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 20) | ok, thank you very much. Are those gps traces available? regards commented 2025-10-28 09:54:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173844385 (Comments: 2) | onmaps (Discussed changesets: 8) | middels changeset 173858154 commented 2025-10-28 09:49:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173874240 (Comments: 1) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 4) | *ERRATUM : Guarbecque commented 2025-10-28 09:47:55 UTC by Yasmina Bendik ♦1 |
| 130435591 (Comments: 1) | Geofreund1 (Discussed changesets: 143) | Hallo Geofreund, wenn du mich vorgestern gefragt hättest, hätte ich Ernst-Abbé geschrieben. Tatsächlich heißt der Mann, nach dem die Straße benannt wurde Ernst-Abbe. Die Straßenschilder sind auch ohne Acc... commented 2025-10-28 09:47:49 UTC by Knottenfresser ♦1 |
| 173802728 (Comments: 1) | Eyegraphic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Beste Eyegraphic, Welkom op openstreetmap! Fijn dat jullie willen bijdragen aan de kaartgegevens. Je hebt al een welkomsbericht gekregen van een andere mapper, als ik me niet vergis. Heb je dit al eens kunnen bekijken, of hierop kunnen antwoor... commented 2025-10-28 09:46:50 UTC by djsa ♦22 |
| 173834265 (Comments: 2) | apires (Discussed changesets: 8) | Olá, Andei este fds por estes lados e concluí esta edição um pouco à pressa e si, ficou a faltar o comentário. Foi micromapping e ajuste aos Ortos mais recentes da DGT. Cumprimentos, APires commented 2025-10-28 09:40:55 UTC by apires ♦7 |
| 173873162 (Comments: 2) | RonaldM011 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Top dankjewel, postbezorging gaat meestal mis omdat de begane grond (47, 49, 51, 53) met eigen voordeur niet worden herkend. Dus wordt het maar in de open centrale hal 'gegooid'. commented 2025-10-28 09:35:42 UTC by RonaldM011 ♦1 |
| 173871253 (Comments: 4) | Loud Flag (Discussed changesets: 2) | ⚲ Wolframkade 2, 3812 RC Amersfoort Het is denk ik nu correct. commented 2025-10-28 09:29:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173845615 (Comments: 1) | IMMO-adviseur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Beste IMMO-adviseur, Je bedrijf op de kaart zetten is een goed idee! Tip: als je de juiste tags toevoegd, zoals office=estate_agent in jullie geval, zal dit betere resultaten opleveren. Vriendelijke groeten, djsa commented 2025-10-28 09:14:25 UTC by djsa ♦22 |
| 173872605 (Comments: 1) | RonaldM011 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Om een adres te vidnen maakt het niet veel uit. Sommige gebruikers vinden het juist weer handig als de adressen op e... commented 2025-10-28 09:13:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173860396 (Comments: 1) | Zaunhänger (Discussed changesets: 12) | Besser den highway-typ in construction = path behalten --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173860396 commented 2025-10-28 08:56:23 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413 |
| 173827329 (Comments: 2) | blauloke (Discussed changesets: 22) | Mist; :( ich arbeite gerade mal wieder eine Liste ab und im Eifer vergesse ich immer nach jedem Eintrag hoch zu laden. Du bist nicht der Erste, der mich deswegen bemängelt. Ich versuche mich zu bessern, kann aber nichts versprechen. :) commented 2025-10-28 08:52:30 UTC by blauloke ♦9 |
| 173841878 (Comments: 2) | Valkai_S (Discussed changesets: 25) | Köszi, már le is vettem a nevét. Csak az érdekesség kedvéért: érdemes lenne-e ilyen esetben "disused ditch"-nek jelölni, vagy lehetne-e valahogy másképp az eredeti ... commented 2025-10-28 08:48:35 UTC by Valkai_S ♦13 |
| 169090679 (Comments: 2) | Lucinux85500 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you, it's been corrected. commented 2025-10-28 08:48:04 UTC by Lucinux85500 ♦4 |
| 173870482 (Comments: 1) | omidmash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed opening hours based on official website: https://www.musee-moyenage.fr/en/visiter/practical-information.html commented 2025-10-28 08:24:11 UTC by omidmash ♦1 |
| 173852809 (Comments: 1) | Paranoic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Paranoic, gràcies per aportar informació a OpenStreetMap, l’etiqueta que s’utilitza més actualment per als identificadors de les wikipedra sembla ser "ref:wikipedra" https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-28 08:23:34 UTC by aTarom ♦824 |
| 173782471 (Comments: 2) | Qiu Weiping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM (again)! Please be careful! You moved the two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/8461388253, https://www.osm.org/node/9975077297 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-10-28 08:18:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173838293 (Comments: 1) | Vicolapatat (Discussed changesets: 4) | Il s’agit bien d’un rond-point traversable, pourquoi changer ? commented 2025-10-28 08:17:30 UTC by Ltrlg ♦79 |
| 173811620 (Comments: 1) | Sonatagardener (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/12233738856 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! commented 2025-10-28 08:07:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173820594 (Comments: 1) | JacksonMiller03 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lanes. I will delete your change. commented 2025-10-28 07:59:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173869155 (Comments: 1) | barrybarry123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , as it's for proper names themselves only. Use `description=` if needed. commented 2025-10-28 07:56:57 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629 |
| 173196930 (Comments: 1) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 120) | Zamiast usuwać dobrze zmapowany ciąg pieszo-rowerowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364218493/history lepiej było usunąć drogę dla rowerów będącą obok. Teraz utworzyłeś źle zmapowane dwie osobne linie. Przypominam, bo już dawno... commented 2025-10-28 07:56:20 UTC by YomanNH ♦387 |
| 173863727 (Comments: 1) | Jess Macpherson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you have mapped two defibrillators at the same spot. Are there two here or should I delete the duplicate? commented 2025-10-28 07:53:58 UTC by nevw ♦2,063 |
| 173831533 (Comments: 1) | dankarcherconstruction (Discussed changesets: 1) | ## Reverted ## Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-10-28 07:52:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173869296 (Comments: 3) | Paweł Akhremczyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего описания могла бы быть: "Магазин гриля и аксессуаров" --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-10-28 07:48:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173861208 (Comments: 1) | Yomapman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please don't overpaint an existing street for renaming. I correct your modification commented 2025-10-28 07:24:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173860447 (Comments: 1) | SueA5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your new path line duplicated the existing path line and it doubled back on itself. The path does exist but it was wrongly positioned. I've removed your duplicated line and corrected the existing path... commented 2025-10-28 07:22:18 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948 |
| 173866900 (Comments: 1) | Axcess Accident Center of Provo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I remove your entry, because you are not part of a praking slot. For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-10-28 07:05:33 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 168455607 (Comments: 2) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 49) | Umieszczanie opisów pod kluczem `name` jest sprzeczne z duchem OSM, więc na pewno komuś wadziło, może nikomu się nie chciało tego zmieniać. Napisałeś po części tak jakbym usunął wyświetlanie drogi jako takiej, a ona cały ... commented 2025-10-28 06:59:50 UTC by dzamper ♦157 |
| 173856542 (Comments: 1) | juesi65 (Discussed changesets: 6) | You can use the ref=* or name=* tag to enter the route number for a bus route, depending on the situation. However, you must add the entire route for this. For details, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%96ffentlicher_Verkehr#Tags_in_der... commented 2025-10-28 06:48:14 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| 141046270 (Comments: 1) | greyst0ke (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I am about to update the boundary of Kurrajong Place Nature Refuge using Capad 2024. I noticed the track following around the bottom and western border but this is not visible on satellite imagery on the western side and around to about where a t... commented 2025-10-28 06:30:19 UTC by nevw ♦2,063 |
| 173854407 (Comments: 1) | czdawes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure the waterway=river tags you added to the rivers are correct? Looking at the satellite images, waterway=stream seems more appropriate. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=river https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta... commented 2025-10-28 06:19:18 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| 166548470 (Comments: 1) | BlumleinPear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, we do not have permission to use the QTopo map for mapping in osm. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Queensland commented 2025-10-28 06:17:03 UTC by nevw ♦2,063 |
| 173779897 (Comments: 4) | Bienson (Discussed changesets: 30) | Danke. commented 2025-10-28 06:15:28 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦10 |
| 173543270 (Comments: 2) | nave88 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi Alex, thank you for your comment. I did not know about the format of the "wikipedia" tag. I had a look at the other UNESCO churches that I had edited, and I fixed this issue. commented 2025-10-28 05:16:05 UTC by nave88 ♦7 |
| 173840461 (Comments: 1) | cromaofficecbba (Discussed changesets: 1) | hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el nombre. Tiene sentido que el nombre sea continuación de la parte sur, tenía dudas, pero vos lo confirmaste. Solo una sugerencia, el prefijo Av. siempre debemos desabreviarlo en nu... commented 2025-10-28 04:37:07 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,600 |
| 173827124 (Comments: 1) | Keek4600 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Es gibt auch weiterhin hier keine 8 verschiedene Krankenhäuser. Und wieso ist dieses Gebäudeteil unverbunden zum westlich anschließenden Gebäudeteil?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445370241 Wieso liegt ... commented 2025-10-28 04:11:04 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 154959926 (Comments: 2) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 155) | Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. In this changeset, I fixed an obviously wrong edit. Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171146756#map=18/35.178579/-106.543897&layers=VN was connected with this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/n... commented 2025-10-28 03:48:19 UTC by ratrun ♦250 |
| 173778439 (Comments: 2) | Wright One (Discussed changesets: 23) | P-line has already removed commented 2025-10-28 03:24:33 UTC by Wright One ♦43 |
| 173827259 (Comments: 1) | Keek4600 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Bitte keine POIs entfernen, wenn z.B. das Ladenlokal noch existiert. Stattdessen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:* commented 2025-10-28 03:13:31 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 173837765 (Comments: 1) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 3) | According to Esri World Imagery, there is no splitter island at 41.1001847,20.0294921, and no filter road at 41.1004609,20.0292378. Those edits look similar to a recently blocked user who added unsourced road layouts, and has not (to date) answered a... commented 2025-10-28 03:12:04 UTC by ika-chan! ♦296 |
| 173854741 (Comments: 1) | Evono (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted, duplicate removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173863304 commented 2025-10-28 03:01:45 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 173432239 (Comments: 1) | PcMouse1 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Please note that all buildings have been georeferenced with LIDAR and multiple imagery sources commented 2025-10-28 03:01:36 UTC by PcMouse1 ♦69 |
| 173862876 (Comments: 1) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 8) | thank you! commented 2025-10-28 02:50:00 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| 167157565 (Comments: 3) | ZeLonewolf (Discussed changesets: 152) | Yes, this is the sign. - The "No Trespassing" sign in the background is meant for the forest adjacent to the road; not the road itself. - The Title 31 definition of "Private road" is to be interpreted as the definition in th... commented 2025-10-28 02:26:50 UTC by aduxas ♦37 |
| 173606011 (Comments: 1) | 残阳逐流 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 很好的成果，太感谢了 commented 2025-10-28 02:07:13 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦9 |
| 173777769 (Comments: 1) | campbelltree (Discussed changesets: 2) | Actual source: private correspondence with HOA --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173777769 commented 2025-10-28 02:05:17 UTC by campbelltree ♦22 |
| 173748708 (Comments: 1) | BG2EWI (Discussed changesets: 1) | set太大了，请您注意拆分 commented 2025-10-28 02:05:13 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦9 |
| 173698505 (Comments: 1) | bluehoneybees (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello there! The changes mostly looks good, except for the one use of 'surface=ground' on way/1444414047 - use an actual descriptive tag, not the generic 'paved' 'unpaved' 'ground'. The other thing to notice is... commented 2025-10-28 01:44:30 UTC by campbelltree ♦22 |
| 173443366 (Comments: 1) | Map-Updater (Discussed changesets: 1) | truck isn't a commonly used access key per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation hgv=* is likely the best tag for "trucks" signage. commented 2025-10-28 01:33:55 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173473008 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | I've updated the tags to driveway. commented 2025-10-28 01:26:41 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173473092 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | I've updated the tags to driveway and disconnected the road from the power line. commented 2025-10-28 01:26:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173473116 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | I've updated the tags to shared driveway commented 2025-10-28 01:24:50 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173473353 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | I've updated the tags to shared driveway commented 2025-10-28 01:24:00 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173700810 (Comments: 3) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, I see that you have reverted the other changes except this changeset and another one. Could you revert these as well? commented 2025-10-28 01:14:13 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22 |
| 173701073 (Comments: 2) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, I see that you have reverted the other changes except this changeset and another one. Could you revert these as well? commented 2025-10-28 01:13:55 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22 |
| 173473709 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | I've updated the tags to a driveway. commented 2025-10-28 00:53:56 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173474004 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | I've updated these to a shared driveway. commented 2025-10-28 00:52:41 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173476014 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | I've updated the tags to be a driveway commented 2025-10-28 00:48:34 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173476128 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | I've updated the tag here to mark it as a driveway. commented 2025-10-28 00:47:49 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173851006 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello, You have updated properties of public transport stops in Germany https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173850855 , housenumbers in Morocco https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173851006 , and speed limits in Mexico https://www.open... commented 2025-10-28 00:17:14 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦331 |
| 88604290 (Comments: 1) | ppjj Imports+NHD (Discussed changesets: 16) | I just noticed that your NHD import was added (2020) after my mapping of the Tununak River and tribs. (2017). I wish you had done a better job of checking for existing waterways before the import operation. commented 2025-10-28 00:09:58 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦170 |
| 173429374 (Comments: 1) | c-the-world (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi. Are you sure your new restaurant is not a duplicate? Location below is correct: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12309485965 commented 2025-10-28 00:08:20 UTC by anshanin ♦22 |
| 88604307 (Comments: 1) | ppjj Imports+NHD (Discussed changesets: 16) | I just noticed that your NHD import was added (2020) after my mapping of the Tununak River and tribs. (2017). I wish you had done a better job of checking for existing waterways before the import operation. commented 2025-10-28 00:06:03 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦170 |
 | 100118497 (Comments: 3) | daganzdaanda (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi daganzdaanda, I think you are correct. Likely I sent this to you by accident. I addressed and sent a message to the contributor who added the tags. Thanks for your response! commented 2025-10-27 23:51:16 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173842183 (Comments: 2) | Ооег (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18876 commented 2025-10-27 23:38:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029 |
| 173855127 (Comments: 1) | StalkerOSM (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305104455 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-10-27 23:34:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173856624 (Comments: 1) | Incognitoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-10-27 23:34:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173860308 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 130) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7655174575 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-27 23:34:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 166163883 (Comments: 1) | Ооег (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - fictitious items https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173860832 commented 2025-10-27 23:33:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029 |
| 163679613 (Comments: 2) | Ооег (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - fictitious items https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173860832 commented 2025-10-27 23:33:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029 |
| 173634537 (Comments: 1) | Ооег (Discussed changesets: 5) | DWG revert - fictitious items https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173860832 commented 2025-10-27 23:33:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029 |
| 173833682 (Comments: 1) | Robotnikmajowy (Discussed changesets: 117) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445397674 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-10-27 23:25:29 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173830075 (Comments: 4) | Yoshi67 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-27 23:25:26 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173829895 (Comments: 6) | Yoshi67 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-27 23:25:24 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173845093 (Comments: 5) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 130) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13261759510 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-27 23:25:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173563166 (Comments: 1) | ilovecycleways (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think to meet https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cyclestreet it must be a road that is signposted/marked to be explicitly for bicycles as the primary road users with motor vehicles as secondary users. commented 2025-10-27 23:07:46 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 162760683 (Comments: 3) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 125) | Cześć, tam ruch jest znacznie niższy niż na Dąbrowskiego czy Powstańców Warszawskich. commented 2025-10-27 23:06:10 UTC by theDM ♦142 |
| 173846478 (Comments: 4) | dav23r (Discussed changesets: 4) | no idea, actually, which one would be better... commented 2025-10-27 23:04:47 UTC by yelisey90 ♦184 |
| 173856372 (Comments: 1) | dr0ptable (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted - accroding to cadastre, the whole building is 16 კორპუსი 3, see https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal . However, if there are any photos of house number signs, they would take priority https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1... commented 2025-10-27 23:04:17 UTC by yelisey90 ♦184 |
| 173568549 (Comments: 1) | yourstreetromer27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | the tag nudism=yes already implies this so no need for a note commented 2025-10-27 23:01:56 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173656081 (Comments: 1) | BakedCake02 (Discussed changesets: 4) | to be honest this looks more urban than rural, given the small block size, dense housing and the road network layout... commented 2025-10-27 22:54:40 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173695831 (Comments: 1) | Deedend (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for merging the address nodes with your new building outlines correctly. commented 2025-10-27 22:49:37 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173740940 (Comments: 1) | bryanf__ (Discussed changesets: 6) | hi this is the footpath not a bridge, therefore I've reverted this change. commented 2025-10-27 22:46:17 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173846401 (Comments: 7) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 130) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2917194110 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-27 22:45:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173070480 (Comments: 2) | VeryFakeName (Discussed changesets: 1) | The trail is real. I hiked the entirety of it commented 2025-10-27 22:42:46 UTC by VeryFakeName ♦1 |
| X | 173848633 (Comments: 1) | phuongxmaya (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://swiftpackageindex.com/keywords/swift/collection.json commented 2025-10-27 22:42:31 UTC by Ok my cocoa ♦1 |
| 173817319 (Comments: 1) | RLMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758025663 is not representing the lot boundary, it's representing the trees, the south east corner looks like grass only so shouldn't be included unless it's been reforested. commented 2025-10-27 22:35:52 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173697375 (Comments: 1) | Dblcut3 (Discussed changesets: 21) | thanks for the update; went to do it myself and saw you already had :D commented 2025-10-27 22:31:50 UTC by skorasaurus ♦217 |
| 173822964 (Comments: 1) | ThierryFr1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've restored the address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12411966515 which was deleted in this changeset. commented 2025-10-27 22:29:31 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 170701671 (Comments: 1) | Leo984567 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've restored the address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12411966515 which was dragged to the wrong location in this changeset. commented 2025-10-27 22:29:17 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173823693 (Comments: 1) | ThierryFr1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've restored the address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419092614 which was deleted here commented 2025-10-27 22:23:50 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173743086 (Comments: 1) | Nicola Delfino (Discussed changesets: 3) | hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap , I just wanted to tell you that there is no missing node for the station, it is already here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1821284 the node you added is a duplicate and I removed it. commented 2025-10-27 22:19:10 UTC by dieterdreist ♦870 |
| 173777581 (Comments: 3) | kingy141000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173859225 commented 2025-10-27 22:17:22 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 173828740 (Comments: 1) | TylerSTREETMAPS (Discussed changesets: 8) | I've reverted this change since added layer=-1 to seemingly ground level buildings which seemingly was done to silence editor warnings. commented 2025-10-27 22:04:24 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173290846 (Comments: 1) | deusjz (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think this should be at least partially reverted. The bike lanes here are on the street and are better represented by tags on the street's Way. In notes on OSM Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_features , there is a discus... commented 2025-10-27 21:55:21 UTC by aldimond ♦4 |
| 173854743 (Comments: 1) | Devin Markley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please don't reclassify a residential road just because it intersects the two carriageways of one road. An unnamed road that does this would be classified as a tertiary LINK, but this road is clearly not unnamed. Thanks! https://ww... commented 2025-10-27 21:44:55 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦118 |
| 173845216 (Comments: 2) | Jeroen van Slooten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pad heb ik als disused:highway=path teruggezet. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-27 21:42:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173852543 (Comments: 2) | lupien (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dat pad 06 lijkt me onlogisch aan te sluiten. commented 2025-10-27 21:32:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173827360 (Comments: 2) | Andy_T_56 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Might be better as official_name ? commented 2025-10-27 21:30:28 UTC by TheSwavu ♦566 |
| 173514108 (Comments: 3) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for getting back to me about this. I wasn't sure about that detail. You ask a great question. When I first started editing OSM data I asked someone I knew about that and they had a really nice explanation. Take for example a buildi... commented 2025-10-27 21:28:53 UTC by AntSom ♦6 |
| 172032720 (Comments: 1) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 203) | vielen Dank - ist die note damit erledigt? commented 2025-10-27 21:28:49 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394 |
| 173833949 (Comments: 4) | Константин Гам (Discussed changesets: 299) | тележек в нем не было commented 2025-10-27 21:28:48 UTC by Nine-tailed ♦14 |
| 172121610 (Comments: 1) | schäumchen (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo schäumchen, Du hast hier mit einem sehr großen CS hunderte von Touringen-Stempelstellen bearbeitet und die Info aus 'ref' als Duplikat nochmals redundant als 'name' erfasst. Darüber ist die Nummer der Stempe... commented 2025-10-27 21:28:38 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦75 |
| 172925026 (Comments: 2) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 28) | Gerne 🙂 commented 2025-10-27 21:26:34 UTC by LaLinea ♦13 |
| 173828992 (Comments: 1) | TylerSTREETMAPS (Discussed changesets: 8) | I've reverted this change since it removed the building type. commented 2025-10-27 21:13:27 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173840299 (Comments: 1) | makskolis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-27 21:05:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173763951 (Comments: 1) | ODI76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Az Ág utcát átnevezted Szél utcára, ez szerepel az utcatáblán? Mert 2022-ben még Ág utca volt. Tamás commented 2025-10-27 21:01:40 UTC by vasony ♦533 |
| 173831518 (Comments: 1) | tastrax (Discussed changesets: 32) | sorry I didn't see your change here, I just reverted the problematic change. commented 2025-10-27 20:59:43 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173829084 (Comments: 1) | TylerSTREETMAPS (Discussed changesets: 8) | I've reverted this change since it deleted all the tags per each semi, and regardless it's better to have each semi mapped individually. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173857036 commented 2025-10-27 20:57:13 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173829902 (Comments: 1) | TylerSTREETMAPS (Discussed changesets: 8) | layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173856994 commented 2025-10-27 20:55:32 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173829113 (Comments: 1) | TylerSTREETMAPS (Discussed changesets: 8) | from the imagery this building does appear to exist so I've reverted this deletion, though it needs a survey to confirm. commented 2025-10-27 20:55:02 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173789796 (Comments: 1) | Domaine de la Potelle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM! Merci pour vos premières contributions. Pour le chemin intitulé "Chemin de terre uniquement accès aux champs", il vaut mieux éviter de mettre cette information dans le nom du chem... commented 2025-10-27 20:52:27 UTC by juminet ♦100 |
| 173602343 (Comments: 1) | anonymouseditor7383 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to Openstreetmap, If possible label the address on the building. If the building has two or more numbers, place the points on the entrance or inside the building. I merged the address points into buildings. Thx, Tamas commented 2025-10-27 20:50:19 UTC by vasony ♦533 |
| 173829945 (Comments: 1) | TylerSTREETMAPS (Discussed changesets: 8) | in the processed deleting the building to replace it with individual buildings you've lost some tags like building=retail and building:levels, where possible these should be retained. commented 2025-10-27 20:49:46 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173829697 (Comments: 2) | TylerSTREETMAPS (Discussed changesets: 8) | layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173856773 commented 2025-10-27 20:47:24 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173829306 (Comments: 1) | TylerSTREETMAPS (Discussed changesets: 8) | layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173856773 commented 2025-10-27 20:47:24 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173845612 (Comments: 3) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 356) | Zie.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173843845#map=18/52.077703/4.280645&layers=N commented 2025-10-27 20:43:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173855565 (Comments: 1) | 86 poschodí (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, aký má byť význam tejto zmeny? Pýtam sa preto, lebo: 1) zbytočne je duplikovaná adresa z budovy na POI, 2) je nepravdepodobné, že by existovala predajňa hudobných nástrojov v ... commented 2025-10-27 20:37:28 UTC by t_ja ♦217 |
| 173848870 (Comments: 1) | lwfsu71 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2025-10-27 20:27:59 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 173795363 (Comments: 3) | NikaRriots (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, yeah I was just checking because someone else was making mistakes with how access tags work a couple months back, but the way you've done it is good. Thanks for mapping! commented 2025-10-27 20:26:35 UTC by RushMM ♦4 |
| 79172614 (Comments: 4) | JanFi (Discussed changesets: 51) | Tja, die officiële aanduidingen zijn dikwijls twijfelachtig. In West-Vlaanderen heb je de rivier de IJzer (en niet de Ijzer zoals Google Maps ze noemt, en daar vind je dan dit staaltje: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.0333831,2.85433,3a,75y,1... commented 2025-10-27 20:15:40 UTC by JanFi ♦51 |
| 173854809 (Comments: 2) | 橘ヒカリ (Discussed changesets: 4) | http://www.360doc.com/content/25/1022/20/8481098_1163495248.shtml commented 2025-10-27 20:12:53 UTC by 橘ヒカリ ♦37 |
| 173814143 (Comments: 1) | arihein2024 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I see that you've added sidewalk:[side] tagging to one or more sidewalks. I haven't seen that tagging scheme before; I've only seen it used on roadways to indicate that there's a sidewalk to the left or right of the ... commented 2025-10-27 20:04:03 UTC by MapAwayThePain ♦12 |
| 173855347 (Comments: 1) | Strongthany (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please remove, I added address to wrong location. commented 2025-10-27 20:02:10 UTC by Strongthany ♦3 |
 | 173329364 (Comments: 1) | Sarca (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you please provide a link of some sort? Bing Maps says the shorter street to the south west is called Andonglaan, and the one you indicated Kenongolaan. Basically they are swapped. Thank you! commented 2025-10-27 19:48:27 UTC by VLD549 ♦307 |
| 173854017 (Comments: 1) | AmongusMan69420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for your edit! I believe this street is still one-way for general traffic, even if buses can enter the other way. Could you explain a bit more about why you changed it just to double check? commented 2025-10-27 19:45:51 UTC by Muzz17 ♦1 |
| 173806631 (Comments: 2) | Pomorze Zachonie (Discussed changesets: 11) | Adresy poprawione - proszę o zapoznanie się z nimi w celu poprawy dalszego mapowania commented 2025-10-27 19:44:20 UTC by bartgron ♦300 |
| 166004173 (Comments: 2) | MattyOh (Discussed changesets: 4) | phodgking, we are allowed to use Ordnance Survey maps if they have the appropriate licence. There are two available as background layers in the iD editor used to make this edit. "Ordnance Survey map" is commonly is used to refer to... commented 2025-10-27 19:16:35 UTC by JassKurn ♦162 |
| 173384209 (Comments: 1) | Mohandev (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Mohandev, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. On the ATM you added, the supermarket has already an ATM, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075450046 Emvee commented 2025-10-27 19:14:09 UTC by emvee ♦393 |
| 173807991 (Comments: 1) | HunterFlower (Discussed changesets: 1) | а зачем тег детского сада удалять? commented 2025-10-27 19:09:10 UTC by literan ♦6,844 |
| 171470482 (Comments: 3) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 129) | Dzięki za szybką reakcję!! Miłego wieczoru commented 2025-10-27 19:09:03 UTC by bpiotrowicz86 ♦3 |
| 173853208 (Comments: 3) | Jose7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i fakticzna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Agencja marketingowa" --- (Auto-translation) commented 2025-10-27 19:00:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173827909 (Comments: 2) | publicfriend (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello :) thanks for helping keeping OSM up to date. There's something that you could improve upon: Names. I know OsmAnd offers to add a name to almost all objects it can add to the database but please don't add descript... commented 2025-10-27 18:59:37 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 173848182 (Comments: 2) | Kin Sapalot (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry, en bedankt! Dan zal ik me ook gaan verdiepen in hoe ik die knooppunten goed kan zien en bewerken in josm. commented 2025-10-27 18:58:06 UTC by Kin Sapalot ♦37 |
| 173829823 (Comments: 3) | Aleks-Berlin (Discussed changesets: 143) | Hello. it seems you are right, the link seems to redirect to an english page. regards commented 2025-10-27 18:55:07 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173771351 (Comments: 1) | F-5 System (Discussed changesets: 57) | привет! а он так называется? может, тогда название повесить правда гуглом чет не гуглится... commented 2025-10-27 18:52:48 UTC by literan ♦6,844 |
| 173852685 (Comments: 2) | Tulip Bloom Boutique (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tulip Bloom Boutique women's clothing and accessories store in West Des Moines IA" commented 2025-10-27 18:48:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| X | 173848835 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Once again, please keep changesets small, it's like your 10th changeset that covers all of the atlantic commented 2025-10-27 18:30:42 UTC by ilias_ ♦317 |
| 173764355 (Comments: 3) | Thomas-Munichways (Discussed changesets: 5) | Vielen Dank, Thomas, habe das Tagging entsprechend geändert. commented 2025-10-27 18:26:59 UTC by trialanderror ♦2 |
| 173848602 (Comments: 1) | StefanoHatari (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi in this changeset you dragged a lot of nodes out of place while trying to add a camera. This is the 2nd time you have done this. Always check the Warning and Changes section to see what changes you have made before clicking publish! ... commented 2025-10-27 18:20:41 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 165803756 (Comments: 3) | Could this be ad space (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Antwort und die Bilder. Leider gibt es meines Wissens nach kein etabliertes Tagging für Postschließfächer. Das wurde gelegentlich andiskutiert, aber nie zu Ende gebracht. Z. B. https://community.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-27 18:16:58 UTC by pyram ♦512 |
| 173636633 (Comments: 2) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 21) | Du hast recht, dyke ist nicht ganz richtig, aber das beste was ich gefunden habe das auch eine Wassermanagementfunktion hat. man_made=embankment ist für einen Eisenbahn- oder Straßendamm, nicht für das Wassermanagement. waterway=dam e... commented 2025-10-27 18:16:56 UTC by akino_germany ♦20 |
| 173843845 (Comments: 2) | onmaps (Discussed changesets: 8) | Is deze instelling verifieerbaar in het veld... maw kun je aan de gevel zien wat er binnen voor activiteiten zijn? Zo niet dan kan deze vermelding beter verwijderd worden. Graag reactie, MVG eggie commented 2025-10-27 18:16:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173367090 (Comments: 2) | Radu Silveanu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Buna seara, multumesc pentru mesaj si pentru link. Este greseala mea. Imi cer iertare. Imi cer iertare si pentru raspunsul intarziat. commented 2025-10-27 18:13:00 UTC by Radu Silveanu ♦3 |
| 173824432 (Comments: 2) | Shyshka (Discussed changesets: 53) | дякую commented 2025-10-27 18:12:48 UTC by Shyshka ♦45 |
| 172249023 (Comments: 4) | Fractale (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, il s'agit simplement d'un bon endroit pour ramacer des chataignes pendant la saison. commented 2025-10-27 18:11:03 UTC by Fractale ♦1 |
| 173802539 (Comments: 8) | Nortix08 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ich war eben vor Ort, es hat sich baulich nix geändert, es stehen auch keine verkehrszeichen für die Radwege, daher habe ich deine Änderung zurückgenom. commented 2025-10-27 18:06:28 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413 |
| 173770454 (Comments: 1) | BrettG7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Brett, Just a heads-up: you had already added The Dirty Duck pub in Inglewood in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173640872. As such I've deleted the one you added in this changeset. Cheers :) commented 2025-10-27 18:05:59 UTC by hoserab ♦207 |
| 173822850 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | User has been blocked, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18873 commented 2025-10-27 18:00:04 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173839737 (Comments: 1) | Zsolt Lazar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdá sa, že tento changeset omylom vymazal niekoľko ciest alebo im zmenil názvy. Prosím, bolo by ho možné revertovať? commented 2025-10-27 17:56:02 UTC by Rick Richards ♦52 |
| 173846878 (Comments: 1) | dobra mapa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cześć Do Twojej edycji wkradł się drobny błąd - PL:rural oznacza obszar niezabudowany. Naprawiłem ten błąd, przy okazji zmieniając maxspeed:type na dużo bardziej popularny w okolicy znacznik source:maxspeed (oznaczają to samo). |
| 164647568 (Comments: 3) | Stadtigel (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hei, ...na dann kommt das aus den Merkzettel, ich hab ja dienstlich Kontakt in Brandenburgische LfU, ins Schutzgebietskataster, da spreche ich das Thema Schutzgebietsgrenzen an Landesgrenzen mal an. Da gibt es einige Stellen mit Abweichungen..... commented 2025-10-27 17:45:51 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,090 |
| 173797149 (Comments: 4) | Kamerijker (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wel ik heb niets gedownload of gekopieerd, enkel geraadpleegd en approximatief overgezet op OSM. Zal dit in het vervolg niet meer vermelden. commented 2025-10-27 17:31:57 UTC by Kamerijker ♦5 |
| 173728198 (Comments: 1) | DaDapperMapper (Discussed changesets: 17) | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-08-01; Esri World Imagery; Mapillary commented 2025-10-27 17:29:43 UTC by DaDapperMapper ♦17 |
| 173277730 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 551) | I am crestfallen to hear all of this guys. I have put a lot of hours in, made many changesets and obviously some errors will have been made as well as misunderstanding of the best practice guidelines. commented 2025-10-27 17:24:37 UTC by UtterClutter ♦37 |
 | 173849174 (Comments: 1) | Ankon10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Ankon10, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 32 highway(s) - 45 natural(s) Could you ple... commented 2025-10-27 17:21:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 163999792 (Comments: 6) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 187) | For me looks like 4*ALS (with the same space between) plus: the 3th light from left: looks like a "Lead-in Light system (LDIN)" plus: the (small) light in the middle: I don't know, what this is. ref - good question: I know... commented 2025-10-27 17:05:55 UTC by Ropino ♦393 |
| 166063719 (Comments: 1) | chap_parched_sir (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, du hast hier mehrere, sich schneidende Gebäude erzeugt. Bei den Reihenhäusern kann man entweder den gesamten Reihenhausblock als ein großes building=terrace angeben oder die einzelnen Einheiten als building=house + house... commented 2025-10-27 17:03:24 UTC by Luzandro ♦946 |
| 173840537 (Comments: 1) | drlellinger (Discussed changesets: 114) | Danke für deine Ergänzungen! Denke bitte daran, wenn du Bürgersteige neu als eigene Wege ergänzt, dass du dann auch die sidewalk-Tags auf den Straßen von "yes" zu "separate" änderst. Auß... commented 2025-10-27 17:01:09 UTC by flo2154 ♦56 |
| 173817909 (Comments: 3) | LizArtjuh (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- ... commented 2025-10-27 16:59:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173789792 (Comments: 3) | Aleksei Besogonov (Discussed changesets: 1) | The building outline is already tagged with the address. It just doesn't render so you can see it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173789792 commented 2025-10-27 16:54:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173847648 (Comments: 2) | vipnuru (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Nuru massage service in Bangkok" commented 2025-10-27 16:48:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173842245 (Comments: 4) | Manexfx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi.. nou het is aardig gelukt. Voor een trekpontje zijn aparte tags. Iets met cable? Zit nu even op mn mobiel. Wellicht even onder ferry kijken in de wiki. Mapse commented 2025-10-27 16:44:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173846815 (Comments: 2) | Leon_Elbe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Kartenbearbeitungen: "Feuerhydrant mit unterirdischem Typ hinzugefügt, 100mm Durchmesser, Gehwegposition, an die Hauptwasserquelle angeschlossen" (Auto-translation) --- Here ... commented 2025-10-27 16:37:25 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173009809 (Comments: 3) | ERU_Mentz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Das Problem ist, dass das Tagging davon unter "Tagging für den Router" fällt (gerade für einen internen Router), da dieser "Weg" ja physisch nicht vorhanden ist (z.B. kann man die Fußwege mit der Bahnsteigfl&a... commented 2025-10-27 16:21:00 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦232 |
| 173826130 (Comments: 2) | yanaaaa (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ось приклад системного редагування, що мається на увазі: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173846415#map=16/47.91273/33.33782 Виставлено building=apartments у будинк... commented 2025-10-27 16:18:58 UTC by i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH ♦55 |
| 173846053 (Comments: 2) | jelmerj (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #173846350 Kijk even hier hoe de verschillende fietspaden worden getagd en ga svp niet van alles wijzigen zonder enige vervaring. G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated,... commented 2025-10-27 16:15:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173845903 (Comments: 1) | jelmerj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback bicycle=no hoeft niet op een steps of footway Dat is default. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
 | 173845595 (Comments: 2) | MainUpdater (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated road names to Inanda Dam Road, Eskebheni Road" commented 2025-10-27 16:07:03 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173842499 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 430) | Bonjour, Merci de votre alerte Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-10-27 16:01:01 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦258 |
| 173631568 (Comments: 2) | Stadtigel (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hallo aceman444! Thank you for your message! Why does not make sense to have bench, table and site on the same node? It is a picnic site and it exists more as one table with more as one bench. If you want create every unique table and e... commented 2025-10-27 15:49:01 UTC by Stadtigel ♦28 |
| 163057025 (Comments: 3) | Stadtigel (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thank you very much for your notes! I will take that into account in the future. commented 2025-10-27 15:46:02 UTC by Stadtigel ♦28 |
| 166026059 (Comments: 2) | Stadtigel (Discussed changesets: 20) | Vielen Dank für deine Anmerkung! Ich werde mich bemühen, das in Zukunft zu berücksichtigen. commented 2025-10-27 15:45:08 UTC by Stadtigel ♦28 |
| 173840538 (Comments: 1) | batıormanı (Discussed changesets: 1) | You wrote “The campground has been permanently closed.” However, you added a guest house. Please write what you actually did in your changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-27 15:42:50 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| 173738686 (Comments: 4) | Tim Niblett (Discussed changesets: 4) | You're right, I re-read it. I've removed all of the bikeways and checked the road tags for bike lanes. commented 2025-10-27 15:38:09 UTC by Tim Niblett ♦4 |
| 170241101 (Comments: 2) | bpiotrowicz86 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Przepraszam za późną odpowiedź i za błędy. Dziękuję za naukę. commented 2025-10-27 15:34:06 UTC by bpiotrowicz86 ♦3 |
| 98891338 (Comments: 1) | d2z321e (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kan je je de bron van het Elfpad nog herinneren? commented 2025-10-27 15:23:50 UTC by djsa ♦22 |
| 173563041 (Comments: 3) | Michał Paluchowski (Discussed changesets: 14) | Dziękuję! commented 2025-10-27 15:14:20 UTC by bpiotrowicz86 ♦3 |
| 173841799 (Comments: 1) | Christoph Knoth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-27 15:13:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173799667 (Comments: 2) | user1572739 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oops, gar nicht gesehen. Ich sehe gerade von meinem Balkon aus, wie die Leute von Norden kommend reihenweise blinken, bremsen und dann irritiert geradeaus zur Maria-Tusch-Straße weiterfahren. :-D Der separat gemappte Fußweg hat sich demna... commented 2025-10-27 15:04:29 UTC by user1572739 ♦24 |
| 173830818 (Comments: 2) | Wander-Lux (Discussed changesets: 4) | Der "Große Collmer Rundweg" hat das Wegsymbol "Weißer Grund mit gelben Querbalken". So ist auch die Wegmarkierung aktuell ausgeschildert. Diese Wegmarkierung und auch die aller anderen Wanderwege in dieserm Wandergebie... commented 2025-10-27 14:54:33 UTC by Wander-Lux ♦3 |
| 173547777 (Comments: 2) | dmjab13 (Discussed changesets: 2) | i mean, sure, but the baseball fields look so pretty when i mark the outfield as sports centre and the dirt as the pitch, lol commented 2025-10-27 14:51:17 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| X | 173810569 (Comments: 1) | aryan seetepalli (Discussed changesets: 1) | please keep changes to one continent or area commented 2025-10-27 14:49:36 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| 173829102 (Comments: 1) | tordans (Discussed changesets: 141) | Korrektur: Der Weg unter der Treppe ist vorhanden; das muss ich reverten… commented 2025-10-27 14:48:13 UTC by tordans ♦421 |
| 173798913 (Comments: 6) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 162) | "da durch foot=use_sidepath enorme Umwege genommen werden mussten." Das ist natürlich ein guter Grund korrigierend einzugreifen. Man könnte natürlich auch alle wichtigen Übergangsmöglichkeiten eintragen (Das wä... commented 2025-10-27 14:34:01 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413 |
| 173761641 (Comments: 4) | SweetGIS (Discussed changesets: 4) | Das Dreieck ist der Militärgemeinde und den Menschen, die in der Nähe leben, vor Ort bekannt. Ich werde es entfernen. commented 2025-10-27 14:28:32 UTC by SweetGIS ♦3 |
| 173825115 (Comments: 2) | archie (Discussed changesets: 288) | Det är ganska uppenbart att det inte finns några som helst spår kvar av järnvägssträckan. Detta kan lätt kontrolleras på marken eller på flygbildslagret på https://minkarta.lantmateriet.se/. Dess... commented 2025-10-27 14:28:31 UTC by archie ♦1,355 |
| 173833213 (Comments: 1) | GodOrJuan (Discussed changesets: 3) | actually, according to cadastre it's მე-6 ქუჩის I შესახვევი https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal commented 2025-10-27 14:27:16 UTC by yelisey90 ♦184 |
| 172857074 (Comments: 1) | ghowen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3431012 commented 2025-10-27 14:23:55 UTC by o_andras ♦58 |
| 163766160 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 14:22:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173806662 (Comments: 3) | GKremp (Discussed changesets: 8) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7926895/history #8 "name=Umweltzone Köln" Gruß Zrop commented 2025-10-27 14:00:10 UTC by Zrop ♦106 |
| 173501187 (Comments: 2) | NKA (Discussed changesets: 142) | Du har rett, Göteborg og Stockholm følger ikke de vanlige skriverådene. Bare endre til det du mener det skal være. commented 2025-10-27 13:46:55 UTC by NKA ♦251 |
| 153081653 (Comments: 1) | Hundehalter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hei, das, was du als Gebäude erfasst hast, ist anscheinend nur noch das Fundament der Antenne. Das angrenzende Gebäude ist abgerissen. Bis 2021 stand es noch: https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/?layerIDs=237,9001,9000,550,159&visib... commented 2025-10-27 13:36:22 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,090 |
| 164018763 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 13:22:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173835960 (Comments: 1) | rarad74 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Link-ul de pe A1 nu ocoleste giratoriul si intra direct pe DN7/DN1. Obligatoriu intra si in giratoriu, dar singura iesire posibila este prima din sensul giratoriu. Banda 1 a giratoriului este separata prin bariere de plastic commented 2025-10-27 13:22:06 UTC by cripistipi ♦1 |
| 149815432 (Comments: 1) | Ieronimus (Discussed changesets: 9) | Olá. O caminho dos Promontórios está marcado com a sinalética oficial e o código PR1 LGA ? commented 2025-10-27 13:14:45 UTC by Alexmol ♦101 |
| 173688256 (Comments: 2) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 130) | No tengo problema con eso, aunque para los efectos del INE siguen siendo poblaciones dispersas commented 2025-10-27 13:13:46 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,210 |
| 173832058 (Comments: 1) | АСМ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Что случилось с https://osm.org/way/148427950 ?Снесли? commented 2025-10-27 13:12:55 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 164090628 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 12:53:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172427346 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 41) | Please don't edit `place=` and `name=` if you don't know them, and didn't read doucmentation. District Council districts are not `=suburb=` nor `=town` in HK. commented 2025-10-27 12:52:56 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629 |
| 164217942 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 12:52:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 164389547 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 12:43:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173835469 (Comments: 1) | cripistipi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Link-ul de pe A1 nu ocoleste giratoriul si intra direct pe DN7/DN1. Obligatoriu intra si in giratoriu. Practic ai blocat intrare in giratoriu de pe A1. trebuia sa il lasi asa, deaorece acel mic link este neglijabil. commented 2025-10-27 12:27:17 UTC by rarad74 ♦309 |
| 173785127 (Comments: 3) | younon3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your answer! In Sweden we only tend to use track for smaller roads. This one leads to several farms. I have changed it to unclassified. But thank you for noticing it wasn't there in the first place! commented 2025-10-27 12:24:32 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦619 |
| 164430242 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 12:08:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 164478280 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 12:06:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172902841 (Comments: 1) | zemexpert (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 К сожалению Яндекс.Карты использовать нельзя. Тем более у ГеоРеестра есть свой сайт, а не только страничка на яндекс.картах commented 2025-10-27 12:04:37 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 172902438 (Comments: 1) | SimonLen888 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 К сожалению Яндекс.Карты использовать нельзя commented 2025-10-27 12:01:59 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 173764883 (Comments: 6) | s8evq (Discussed changesets: 57) | Na wat verder onderzoek bleek dat ik van Grote Routepaden VZW de GPX gekregen had van de GR 5 zoals die begin volgend jaar hertekend zal worden, niet zoals de situatie momenteel ter plaatse is. Ik heb al mijn bewerkingen teruggedraaid. Zo zie je maar... commented 2025-10-27 12:00:22 UTC by s8evq ♦192 |
| 172900339 (Comments: 1) | Арсениус (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его Ещё, после того как нарисовали здание не забывайт... commented 2025-10-27 11:59:47 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 173834322 (Comments: 2) | davi lucas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aqui está um comentário de amostra com base nas suas edições do mapa: "Adicionada estrada principal" (Auto-translation) --- Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added trunk road" commented 2025-10-27 11:57:03 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 146934917 (Comments: 1) | Milancer (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi! Why were the following relations deleted as part of this change? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1757638 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1757766 commented 2025-10-27 11:54:26 UTC by emarv ♦20 |
| 173706104 (Comments: 3) | fredlenoir (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sur le wiki d'osm , on préconise access=no + bus=designated (cas de figure cidessus); motor_vehicle=no + bus=designated when shared by bicycles (cas pour le quai des ardennes) . utiliser highway= service n'est pas à faire se... commented 2025-10-27 11:53:26 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15 |
| 172900925 (Comments: 1) | VAZ2106_E298RC_58 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его Ещё, в правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настр... commented 2025-10-27 11:48:41 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 173564502 (Comments: 2) | VatskiKvas (Discussed changesets: 1) | принял! спасибо commented 2025-10-27 11:39:37 UTC by VatskiKvas ♦1 |
| 164420845 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 274) | Na terenie woj. zachodniopomorskiego raczej nie powinno być kaszubskiej nazwy. Nie pojawia się w zachodniopomorskiej uchwale commented 2025-10-27 11:34:06 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
| 173766175 (Comments: 2) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-27 11:14:45 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦10 |
| 173761688 (Comments: 1) | personne14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, La piscine que vous avez tracée n’existe plus sous cette forme : vous avez utilisé des images datant de 2022 où une piscine temporaire (probablement gonflable ?) est présente. Or les objets tempor... commented 2025-10-27 11:10:25 UTC by Ltrlg ♦79 |
| 173631450 (Comments: 2) | Thundafox (Discussed changesets: 8) | I added the Informations, the App I uploaded the waypoints with did miss to include the info. commented 2025-10-27 11:02:01 UTC by Thundafox ♦3 |
| X | 173831811 (Comments: 1) | Ivan_Povodlo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Ivan_Povodlo, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions! I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locat... commented 2025-10-27 11:01:07 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173816374 (Comments: 1) | Derkoenig (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, das neue Stellwerk ist elektronisch. Elektromechanische Stellwerke werden seit 50 Jahren nicht mehr gebaut :) commented 2025-10-27 10:56:09 UTC by gallseife ♦45 |
| 173808818 (Comments: 1) | queerthoughts (Discussed changesets: 19) | super, dankjewel! commented 2025-10-27 10:42:55 UTC by Joske1020 ♦4 |
 | 173825033 (Comments: 1) | taihoku (Discussed changesets: 20) | 抱歉畫到一半先傳了 QQ 這邊新五路拉開的原因是因為交流道改善工程後，中間橋樑佔用因而道路往外拓 我後面的 changeset 畫完後應該可以理解，也可以看一下 Mapillary https://www.openst... commented 2025-10-27 10:38:48 UTC by Littlebtc ♦64 |
| 173258858 (Comments: 1) | jonathand299 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just got here to see if a shop was already on the map. Great to see you updated the shop info here! Happy mapping. commented 2025-10-27 10:29:17 UTC by Lachgast ♦124 |
| 173827916 (Comments: 2) | HennyT (Discussed changesets: 1) | sport = billiards toegevoegd commented 2025-10-27 10:29:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173830319 (Comments: 2) | victor0174 (Discussed changesets: 1) | En me basant sur tes modifications de carte dans cet ensemble de changements, j'ai rédigé une suggestion pour ce à quoi un commentaire pourrait ressembler : "Mise à jour des attributs du tunnel, suppression des i... commented 2025-10-27 10:26:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 170666825 (Comments: 2) | sim6 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ops, thanks. I fixed it via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173830524 commented 2025-10-27 10:23:02 UTC by sim6 ♦17 |
| 173810929 (Comments: 2) | meeuw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Geen probleem, ik waardeer het zeer dat je verbeteringen maakt. Ik had inderdaad deze notitie eerder moeten toevoegen om het duidelijk te maken. commented 2025-10-27 10:17:25 UTC by meeuw ♦1 |
| 173706768 (Comments: 3) | caboulot (Discussed changesets: 7) | Pour info des images aériennes plus récentes sont disponibles ici et dans plusieurs autres départements : Ortho Express IGN 2025. On peut y voir que la route a changé à cet endroit. commented 2025-10-27 10:14:13 UTC by Syl ♦998 |
| 173332203 (Comments: 1) | BMoney2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you mark the current Shands Bridge as motorway? It's not grade separated from local traffic. commented 2025-10-27 10:13:19 UTC by OrdinaryScarlett ♦14 |
| X | 173791201 (Comments: 1) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 重复了，这里实在太多个白须公礁的点了，不要再加了。 commented 2025-10-27 09:53:52 UTC by Xcbino ♦1 |
| 164576652 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 09:50:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173712694 (Comments: 2) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 15) | ist korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2025-10-27 09:48:27 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦10 |
| 173018158 (Comments: 2) | Beroul_fm (Discussed changesets: 1) | La fontaine est à l' entrée du parc ,les heures d' ouverture sont tous les jours sauf le lundi comme indiqué dans ma modif . les infos ont été vérifiés sur place. En janvier je tracerais les ... commented 2025-10-27 09:47:01 UTC by Beroul_fm ♦1 |
| 173710740 (Comments: 2) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ok, meistens merkt man solche ungewollten Verschiebungen nicht. commented 2025-10-27 09:43:32 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦10 |
| 164581431 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-27 09:41:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173827839 (Comments: 1) | in-map (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-27 09:40:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173802593 (Comments: 1) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 162) | Ein Wegweiser zum Recyclinghof ist kein Touristischer Wegweiser. Der Fehler liegt hier wohl tiefer. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173802593 commented 2025-10-27 09:39:16 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413 |
| 173665577 (Comments: 6) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ok, sorry. commented 2025-10-27 09:35:55 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦10 |
| 173611362 (Comments: 3) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi aceman44, thank you for making the corrections on lane numbers. I will be more careful on lanes and lane-specific tagging in my future edits. Regarding the oneway tag, it is not wrong, but redundant as documented in the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.o... commented 2025-10-27 09:34:58 UTC by Nar_ach ♦11 |
 | 173254702 (Comments: 2) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi GrabMY_ainayusof, thank you for making the corrections with your local insights. commented 2025-10-27 09:33:03 UTC by Kaduna ♦25 |
| 173824876 (Comments: 6) | Mikulic Fahrschule Zürich (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi UT93, ja, gerne, ich habe ausschließlich die Node der Fahrschule mir angeschaut. Danke! commented 2025-10-27 09:32:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173826727 (Comments: 2) | Tisataloma88 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Adresnode nr 4 hersteld. Die bestaat nog volgens het Kadaster. commented 2025-10-27 09:20:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173822017 (Comments: 2) | Carlavissers (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik heb wel een route gemaakt over de markt. Of deze route geschikt is voor hulpdiensten is up to you. emergency=yes ontbreekt dus nog. commented 2025-10-27 09:14:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173825225 (Comments: 3) | BEYOND Personal Trainer Amsterdam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wellicht even uitzoeken via hun site, want de vermeldingen zitten elkaar misschien in de weg. De info heb ik wel samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode 303A commented 2025-10-27 09:09:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173708408 (Comments: 2) | Keek4600 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ich habe die Funktionen jetzt auf Gebäudeteile gelegt. commented 2025-10-27 09:01:32 UTC by Keek4600 ♦2 |
| 166515142 (Comments: 2) | Vinber (Discussed changesets: 14) | salut, tu as raison, je penche pour une erreur de manip lors de l'usage de mapcomplete ! merci du signalement, retiré https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173827128 commented 2025-10-27 09:01:16 UTC by Vinber ♦811 |
| 173076786 (Comments: 1) | Hung Tran 9x0 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Vậy xóa luôn relation 9802982 nhé bạn. commented 2025-10-27 09:00:57 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦248 |
| 173826395 (Comments: 1) | CMCotes (Discussed changesets: 1) | In this changeset and the previous changeset you have modified almost 13,000 nodes, adding a "source" tag. I don't know how you managed to do that as the changeset comment clearly indicates that you wanted to do something else instead!... commented 2025-10-27 08:57:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,479 |
| 173826804 (Comments: 2) | tanksnyc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Environmental services company" commented 2025-10-27 08:54:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173813653 (Comments: 2) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 8) | Aangepast naar adresnode.. office=consulting MVG eggie commented 2025-10-27 08:49:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
 | 173523089 (Comments: 3) | Department of Municipalities and Transport Abu_Dhabi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your clarification! Best regards, Maryna commented 2025-10-27 08:46:03 UTC by Maryna Makarava ♦17 |
| 173706348 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 47) | Ciao @totera, hai ragione, l’utilizzo di parking_space sembra essere la soluzione migliore. Il parking_lot deve invece contenere la strada di accesso per ragioni di routing, così mi è stato segnalato dai tool di diagnostica. commented 2025-10-27 08:39:11 UTC by f_gonella ♦38 |
| 173337857 (Comments: 2) | RI9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Most je otvorený. Starý most je zatvorený - neprejazdný. commented 2025-10-27 08:38:13 UTC by RI9 ♦1 |
| 173682351 (Comments: 2) | Dornbacher (Discussed changesets: 23) | sorry & danke für Hinweis und Korrektur! commented 2025-10-27 08:35:43 UTC by Dornbacher ♦12 |
| 173628669 (Comments: 2) | Geopartner (Discussed changesets: 3) | It's actually an error, due to too much copy-pasting... thanks for reporting it! commented 2025-10-27 08:33:11 UTC by Geopartner ♦3 |
| 173759397 (Comments: 2) | hmkaiser (Discussed changesets: 100) | Vektor-Längen von mehreren Kilometern, hier sogar > 99 km, behindern, bzw. unterbinden eine detaillierte Erfassung, Pflege von Eigenschaften, die diesem Vektor zugeordnet werden können. Viele Grüße! commented 2025-10-27 08:26:11 UTC by hmkaiser ♦57 |
| 173718224 (Comments: 4) | Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (Discussed changesets: 14) | Dag Eggie, Ik heb chatGPT gebruikt en deze gaf fire_service aan. motor_vehicle=private heb ik niet toegevoegd, geen idee hoe die erin komt. Aanpassing heeft in ieder geval gewerkt, navigatie in onze brandweervoertuigen gebruikt nu deze r... commented 2025-10-27 08:16:57 UTC by Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) ♦8 |
| 172263861 (Comments: 2) | 7beren (Discussed changesets: 14) | I agree with you. You can alter the nam. commented 2025-10-27 08:14:04 UTC by 7beren ♦4 |
| 173745183 (Comments: 1) | Prince majid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this changeset completely changed the characteristics of this node. Can you please revert? commented 2025-10-27 07:59:36 UTC by vricciardulli ♦22 |
| 173815046 (Comments: 1) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 166) | Dzięki commented 2025-10-27 07:55:49 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
 | 173819663 (Comments: 1) | Banibatiti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Banibatiti, you have created duplicates of this office at different locations. Which is the right one? commented 2025-10-27 07:49:30 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦108 |
| 146907301 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 430) | Bonjour, En effet, désolé pour l'erreur, c'est corrigé Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-10-27 07:46:17 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦258 |
| 173795074 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 61) | That's here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158183482 commented 2025-10-27 07:44:46 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629 |
| 173823133 (Comments: 3) | Promtechnotreid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Просто чтобы помочь проиллюстрировать, что я имею в виду, вот как ваше описание могло бы выглядеть в более нейтральной, фактической форм... commented 2025-10-27 07:06:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173344325 (Comments: 3) | SweetGIS (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, danke für Ihre Antwort. Was ist denn die Quelle von den "Kommentaren anderer Nutzer"? Hier in diesem Changeset steht ja nur "source=local knowledge". commented 2025-10-27 06:44:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173777691 (Comments: 3) | SweetGIS (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, danke für Ihre Antwort. Was ist denn die Quelle von den "Kommentaren anderer Nutzer"? Hier in diesem Changeset steht ja nur "source=local knowledge". Mir ist dieses "Dürer-Dreieck" oder jetzt "D&uum... commented 2025-10-27 06:44:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173822458 (Comments: 2) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822516 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:37:32 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822439 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822466 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:35:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822446 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822461 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:34:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822406 (Comments: 2) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822453 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:34:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822421 (Comments: 2) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822449 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:34:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822427 (Comments: 2) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822441 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:34:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822359 (Comments: 2) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | Consulte https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79 --- Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-... commented 2025-10-27 06:33:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173816805 (Comments: 1) | sintia323 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003899336/history/27). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/change... commented 2025-10-27 06:30:23 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64 |
| 173822306 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822317 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:29:40 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822297 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822310 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:29:25 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822284 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822301 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:29:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822275 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822288 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:28:51 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822261 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822274 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:28:26 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822255 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822260 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:28:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822234 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822239 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:27:32 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822206 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822233 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:27:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822194 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822215 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:26:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822180 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822210 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:26:31 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822071 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822201 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:26:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822088 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822191 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:25:46 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822107 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822187 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:25:37 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822172 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822182 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:25:24 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821509 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822176 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:25:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821525 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822173 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:24:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821563 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822170 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:24:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821570 (Comments: 3) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822164 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:24:32 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821615 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822158 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:24:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821631 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822154 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:24:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821636 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822151 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:23:52 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821641 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822146 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:23:40 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821650 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822138 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:23:28 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821655 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822134 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:23:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821713 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822128 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:23:00 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821723 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822121 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:22:47 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821728 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822116 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:22:35 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821738 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822113 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:22:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821772 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822106 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:22:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821779 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822104 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:21:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821820 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822100 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:21:47 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821845 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822094 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:21:34 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821899 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822089 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:21:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821918 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822072 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:20:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821765 (Comments: 1) | Tomasz_R (Discussed changesets: 34) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260855443 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-10-27 06:20:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173821924 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822068 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:20:47 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173822053 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822060 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:20:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173821949 (Comments: 1) | hefyomudro (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822054 where the changeset comment is: Remove vandalism commented 2025-10-27 06:20:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173207703 (Comments: 3) | Eduardo Saverin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for your reply. When used together with route=ferry access tags indicate which modes of transport are allowed to use the ferry. Cars and motorcycles can't drive underwater but they can drive on and off the ship. Ple... commented 2025-10-27 05:32:16 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦163 |
| 173778829 (Comments: 1) | cnvery (Discussed changesets: 37) | 怎麼把胡適公園的Wikidata被移除了，沒有恢復 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173778829 commented 2025-10-27 05:24:49 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,512 |
| 173782493 (Comments: 1) | f4phantom (Discussed changesets: 8) | Merhaba. Kapatılan hesabınızdan(uid:23189629) eklediğiniz alan(way/1424343814) bir hobi bahçesi gibi duruyor. Eğer bu alana "Arif Coşkun'un Bağ Yeri" yazmanızın sebebi sadece bu alanın sahibini belirtmek ise bu yanlı... commented 2025-10-27 05:21:05 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| 173814673 (Comments: 1) | johanbont (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Il n'y a aucun intérêt à ajouter un tag addr:street si l'adresse à déjà une relation Associated Street. Différents sujets sur le forum expliquent les différentes manière... commented 2025-10-27 05:18:43 UTC by blm07 ♦5 |
| 173737916 (Comments: 12) | hatochan (Discussed changesets: 21) | 夜の見込みでしたが、時間が取れましたので当該の5軒に関して復元を行いました。 追加の苦言になり恐縮ですが、建物が変化して更新する際は、近くにあるという理由でウェイをそ... commented 2025-10-27 05:15:58 UTC by 大山かなめ ♦62 |
| 59137909 (Comments: 2) | MadelNL (Discussed changesets: 31) | Luc, Dank voor het aanpassen, ik denk dat ik gewoon een fout heb gemaakt en dat ik er idd de tag viewpoint aan had willen hangen. Op Mapillary plaats ik foto's onder de naam "madel" hier inmiddels onder de naam MadelNL, dus die s... commented 2025-10-27 04:53:31 UTC by MadelNL ♦71 |
| 173757586 (Comments: 3) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 18) | A tutaj jest oryginalny changeset, bo w tym tylko poprawiłem na szybko w iD. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173671436 commented 2025-10-27 03:51:00 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦24 |
| 171984822 (Comments: 8) | Michael N (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the clarification. Just to be clear, when I said “treated as a public street,” I wasn’t referring to ownership — only that it’s listed in the city’s GIS as a named street and used for addresses. I unders... commented 2025-10-27 03:29:27 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124 |
| 173811964 (Comments: 4) | ion_chi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Yes, exactly. No problem commented 2025-10-27 01:57:52 UTC by ion_chi ♦35 |
| 173816935 (Comments: 1) | olo81 (Discussed changesets: 100) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260590012 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-27 01:11:30 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173792705 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 388) | That would be my typo 😆 Good catch, thanks! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173792705 commented 2025-10-27 01:09:50 UTC by Kinsio ♦24 |
| 172679720 (Comments: 1) | Michael N (Discussed changesets: 6) | Soden Place should be listed as a pedestrian street — it’s shown in the city’s GIS map and has properties that use that address. commented 2025-10-27 00:28:29 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124 |
| 173794255 (Comments: 1) | vnoixopj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18871 commented 2025-10-27 00:05:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029 |
| 173781693 (Comments: 1) | BakedCake02 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Edgeroi is already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5793377 as a place=hamlet. I've reverted this change since it created a duplicate place for Edgeroi. commented 2025-10-27 00:04:57 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173781685 (Comments: 1) | Jasonl1111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | unit 3 is already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12416900561 and this address is already mapped as addr:unit=1. I've reverted this change. commented 2025-10-27 00:02:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173531763 (Comments: 2) | donovaly (Discussed changesets: 37) | Yes, I meant uic_ref. Thanks for your fix. commented 2025-10-26 23:59:19 UTC by donovaly ♦40 |
| 173791546 (Comments: 1) | bryanf__ (Discussed changesets: 6) | you can add multiple buildings in one changeset, then save at the end rather than creating a changeset for each building. commented 2025-10-26 23:50:37 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 173465063 (Comments: 1) | KB-01 (Discussed changesets: 35) | This changeset messed up the turn restrictions at Wootton Parkway & Fleet Street, though some popular routers were still able to guess what was intended. I fixed the turn restrictions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173815915 . commented 2025-10-26 23:48:14 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦73 |
| 173807341 (Comments: 1) | LovelyPL (Discussed changesets: 7) | Odkleiłem plac zabaw od linii energetycznej co by nie było dymu o to. Przeglądałem dostępne zdjęcia i rendery tego co ma być na tym osiedlu i prawdopodobnie i tak trzeba będzie przy nowszym orto poprzestawiać choćby właśnie plac za... commented 2025-10-26 23:36:14 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦551 |
| 173658077 (Comments: 1) | Dimfsic4554f576 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-10-26 23:33:30 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 173621969 (Comments: 1) | qaz909 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не вносите личные данные в OSM commented 2025-10-26 23:31:45 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 173589499 (Comments: 1) | anon94089323 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Подозреваю в левом верхнем углу вы прихватили лишний кусок дороги. Исправил, проверьте И ещё. В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «... commented 2025-10-26 23:28:39 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 173808994 (Comments: 1) | Rtydtydl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ta nazwa ulicy jest nieprawidłowa commented 2025-10-26 22:49:35 UTC by bartgron ♦300 |
| X | 173683055 (Comments: 1) | lbellomo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, were each of these checked before making this change? It seems like you have, but an edit focused on a couple of tags and this wide often ends up being an automated edit. --- Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2025-10-26 22:36:40 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 173809414 (Comments: 2) | kevin open street (Discussed changesets: 1) | The chance of it being re-added is very unlikely. The habitat/environment was restored. commented 2025-10-26 22:36:32 UTC by matthewfecica ♦6 |
| 173789932 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi mate, please don't upload changesets where your changes span large areas as you have in the last few uploads, they make it very difficult for local mappers to keep up to date on updates in their local area, thanks :) https://wiki.opens... commented 2025-10-26 22:29:32 UTC by ExoMal ♦38 |
| 129445821 (Comments: 3) | Dodko (Discussed changesets: 39) | Naopak, terrace sa dava vtedy, ked v OSM je jeden dom reprezentujuci viacere domy v radovej zastavbe. Ale ked ich uz rozdelime (napr. na umiestnenie adries), ma to byt building=house. commented 2025-10-26 22:28:01 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699 |
| 173804227 (Comments: 2) | pan_borsuk (Discussed changesets: 72) | thank You 4 lesson :-). i was confused how tu mark it. commented 2025-10-26 22:20:25 UTC by pan_borsuk ♦61 |
| 173697868 (Comments: 1) | MKT HPG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, when adding links to OSM, please don't add utm tags to the URL --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173697868 commented 2025-10-26 22:11:28 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384 |
| 163916526 (Comments: 2) | Henten Človek (Discussed changesets: 7) | A preco ste znicili jednotlive budovy, z ktorych sa OC sklada? A preco ste zrusili kvalitnejsie udaje a nahradili bodmi bez udajov, ako napr. Tesco? Trochu pozerajte co robite. commented 2025-10-26 22:11:23 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699 |
| 173643356 (Comments: 1) | RLakhani (Discussed changesets: 24) | So the road that links Narowal and Dera Baba Nank isn't a highway? The road that's called "Guru Nanak Highway" is merely a service road? By the way, It's connected to Narowal Road, which is a Primary road. This definitely des... commented 2025-10-26 21:54:27 UTC by Jacksonville ♦20 |
| 140719418 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 266) | Budova v budove? Neviem aky zmysel mala tato zmena. Myslim, ze predosly stav bol spravnejsi. commented 2025-10-26 21:49:42 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699 |
| 173798885 (Comments: 2) | Fskrid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey eggie, the entrance reception is where I put the mark. Cheers, F commented 2025-10-26 21:47:20 UTC by Fskrid ♦1 |
| 173796542 (Comments: 1) | shubha jayant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I have reverted your changes to Sydney Olympic Park suburb. commented 2025-10-26 21:46:10 UTC by nevw ♦2,063 |
| 171206719 (Comments: 2) | Selina576 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I'll be honest I didn't even know you could plot routes on here (still very new to the mapping thing). Guess I know what to work on next - thanks for your advice! - Isobel :) commented 2025-10-26 21:42:01 UTC by Selina576 ♦2 |
| 173810899 (Comments: 5) | GewoonStephan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ik zal het over een paar dagen eens bekijken, zo nodig pas ik het dan wel aan. Thanks! commented 2025-10-26 21:28:10 UTC by GewoonStephan ♦4 |
| 173768160 (Comments: 2) | MWpg (Discussed changesets: 3) | ❤️ commented 2025-10-26 21:15:27 UTC by MWpg ♦2 |
| 173787275 (Comments: 2) | LucGommans (Discussed changesets: 29) | Merci! Though I knew of this I'm just trying pruning some of the most ridiculous ones. I can't prove that there exists no grandma living in Morschenich that calls one half of the field between Petershof and B264 "Unter Büna... commented 2025-10-26 21:12:40 UTC by LucGommans ♦71 |
| 173808825 (Comments: 1) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 41) | Actual changes in SE quarter of frame commented 2025-10-26 21:08:19 UTC by Makeena ♦43 |
| 168729598 (Comments: 1) | Agnes_baby (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, are you sure about the buttons you are selecting in StreetComplete? I can tell that these roads are https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=asphalt not https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=paving%20stones can you clarify? commented 2025-10-26 20:56:34 UTC by Enock4seth ♦582 |
| 167915976 (Comments: 1) | Agnes_baby (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Agnes_baby, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you clarify why you changed valid & verified existing `building=*` tags on multiple buildings to shed/hut/detached/apartment. Buildings such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155291679 and https://w... commented 2025-10-26 20:48:22 UTC by Enock4seth ♦582 |
| 173811008 (Comments: 3) | esaulenka (Discussed changesets: 19) | Block A and B markings are necessary for distinguishing of the two buildings, that otherwise share the same address(4 Kedar st). commented 2025-10-26 20:44:58 UTC by Fraxi ♦169 |
| 169582168 (Comments: 7) | Grzegorz_Kujawa (Discussed changesets: 21) | Od strony Romera nie ma znaku D-40. Z drugiej strony (od Biedronki) nie ma przejazdu na wprost (stoją stałe słupki), a omijając skwer zieleni (przy Akademii Psyche) na wyjeździe stoi znak D-41. Zmień na "service", bo faktycznie bardz... commented 2025-10-26 20:41:41 UTC by Grzegorz_Kujawa ♦35 |
| 173507951 (Comments: 3) | Naturhund (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Naturhund, vielen Dank für die Info. Die Freigaben habe ich soeben entsprechend erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173811472 Viele Grüße whb commented 2025-10-26 20:38:53 UTC by whb ♦633 |
| 173810887 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 53) | I'm guessing the error was caused by TIGER misalignment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup/Alignment) and the TIGER tags were intended to apply to the northern way, so I moved the TIGER tags rather than just deleting them, FWIW. commented 2025-10-26 20:16:56 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦73 |
| 173475790 (Comments: 1) | MirkoOSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin! Hier ist ein einzelner Stellplatz mitten auf der Straße gelandet. War das Absicht? Auf dem Luftbild sieht man den zumindest nicht. VG geomaniX commented 2025-10-26 20:00:23 UTC by geomaniX ♦45 |
| 173577126 (Comments: 3) | Fabe56 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Corrigé, merci ;) commented 2025-10-26 19:50:39 UTC by Fabe56 ♦44 |
| 173771079 (Comments: 1) | Elmiina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moi, laajensit metsää alueelle jossa näytäisi olevan nyt sorakuoppaa ks. esim. mapboxin ilmakuvat commented 2025-10-26 19:48:28 UTC by Larmax ♦290 |
 | 173789185 (Comments: 1) | Poncratis (Discussed changesets: 4) | For your information, this changeset was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173801587 commented 2025-10-26 19:47:52 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦108 |
| 173727627 (Comments: 4) | Halfdeaf007 (Discussed changesets: 12) | I didn't say that you can't, I said that it's less detail to have it where the nodes intersect. Do you have a good reason for why less detail would be preferable? commented 2025-10-26 19:45:56 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦53 |
| 173743148 (Comments: 1) | Yaa2Darko (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for mapping. This looks more commercial, especially on the eastern part. commented 2025-10-26 19:41:23 UTC by Enock4seth ♦582 |
| 173788559 (Comments: 1) | DD_FFO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13257826765: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren u... commented 2025-10-26 19:38:15 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 171383285 (Comments: 2) | l3mon1zer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Absolut richtig, danke, habs angepasst. commented 2025-10-26 19:38:02 UTC by l3mon1zer ♦2 |
| 173777095 (Comments: 1) | JeffKirk (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: driveways typically are not named, but you could add your address to the building so software can route you to your home. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173777095 ... commented 2025-10-26 19:33:06 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173537705 (Comments: 4) | Derbeth (Discussed changesets: 7) | Koparki też nie było. commented 2025-10-26 19:29:07 UTC by Adam_Piszczek ♦178 |
| 173807125 (Comments: 1) | GewoonStephan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke. oneway=no is al default overigens. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-26 19:28:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173809145 (Comments: 2) | Дудом (Discussed changesets: 1) | На основі ваших змін у цій зміні, я склав пропозицію щодо того, яким міг би бути коментар: "Оновлено використання землі на сільськогосп... commented 2025-10-26 19:26:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173176925 (Comments: 1) | Gfgfgfgfgflkmvkhfhjiteqanjkkfcsipjgd (Discussed changesets: 26) | Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node. commented 2025-10-26 19:21:26 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018 |
| 173148576 (Comments: 1) | Gfgfgfgfgflkmvkhfhjiteqanjkkfcsipjgd (Discussed changesets: 26) | Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node. commented 2025-10-26 19:20:46 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018 |
| 173149474 (Comments: 1) | Gfgfgfgfgflkmvkhfhjiteqanjkkfcsipjgd (Discussed changesets: 26) | Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node. commented 2025-10-26 19:20:31 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018 |
| 173149710 (Comments: 1) | Gfgfgfgfgflkmvkhfhjiteqanjkkfcsipjgd (Discussed changesets: 26) | Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node. commented 2025-10-26 19:20:19 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018 |
| 173758130 (Comments: 3) | aprilfrisch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Für OSM muss man auch mal buddeln ;-) commented 2025-10-26 19:01:54 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 168607496 (Comments: 5) | Drevviken65 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Även den blev reverterad. Gick genom alla ändringar han har gort (inte så många), blev en eller annan till... commented 2025-10-26 18:56:12 UTC by Fjellrev ♦15 |
| 170330758 (Comments: 5) | _torsten_ (Discussed changesets: 43) | Ok, hab ich so gemacht. Evtl nicht ganz perfekt je nach Umfang der Forstarbeiten. commented 2025-10-26 18:53:49 UTC by cxfahrer2 ♦1 |
| 173739193 (Comments: 1) | drebelo40 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you explain what this sign shows? The tags are not sufficient to tell. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13255172612 commented 2025-10-26 18:46:14 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 173801815 (Comments: 5) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 356) | Ok, ik zal waterway onthouden. Middenstuk is maandag volledig weg, ze zijn halverwege momenteel. Excuses dat ik je veel werk heb bezorgd. commented 2025-10-26 18:37:00 UTC by GewoonStephan ♦4 |
| 173786618 (Comments: 2) | Dillen GJ (Discussed changesets: 62) | Ok prima opgelost dan A67-A67 commented 2025-10-26 18:36:58 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦42 |
| 173806509 (Comments: 3) | GewoonStephan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sorry, thanks voor de aanvullingen. Dit zal ik tzt een keer doen. commented 2025-10-26 18:24:52 UTC by GewoonStephan ♦4 |
| 173799306 (Comments: 1) | Koler75 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-26 18:17:05 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173802579 (Comments: 1) | pa3weg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-26 18:16:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 169898133 (Comments: 2) | SKald (Discussed changesets: 21) | Keine Ursache. Happy mapping! commented 2025-10-26 18:11:28 UTC by SKald ♦37 |
| 173791099 (Comments: 2) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 8) | Looks like it got dragged and merged. Un-merged. commented 2025-10-26 18:09:12 UTC by ICT_maps ♦6 |
| 173291500 (Comments: 4) | Midas_Broken_Touch (Discussed changesets: 3) | As described, keys were used in these imports whose meanings were not defined. Since the (presumed) plants are actually well described in the wiki, the need for new keys is of course questionable. But enjoy your holiday first, that's the priorit... commented 2025-10-26 18:05:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173539227 (Comments: 2) | GKremp (Discussed changesets: 8) | ist wieder korrigiert commented 2025-10-26 18:00:48 UTC by GKremp ♦6 |
| 173766208 (Comments: 1) | proemr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Metro hattındakidaki hatayı düzelttiğiniz için teşekkürler. Düzeltirken ilişkinin bütünlüğü bozulmuş. Onu da düzeltebilir misiniz? Şu ilişkiye tıkladığınızda kopuk kısmı gör... commented 2025-10-26 17:56:21 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| 173805995 (Comments: 1) | Mario26mario (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-26 17:51:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173623270 (Comments: 3) | Gerhard42 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Alles gut :) kenn ich commented 2025-10-26 17:49:55 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 173800373 (Comments: 2) | GKremp (Discussed changesets: 8) | sorry, das war nicht gewollt ist korrigiert Gruß Günther commented 2025-10-26 17:49:19 UTC by GKremp ♦6 |
| 173797196 (Comments: 1) | mdavids (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ik geloof dat de juiste term 'kazemat' is. commented 2025-10-26 17:48:57 UTC by mdavids ♦6 |
| 173805840 (Comments: 1) | tg4567 (Discussed changesets: 25) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173805840 commented 2025-10-26 17:38:35 UTC by tg4567 ♦35 |
| 173795907 (Comments: 1) | mwald (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Beim Einzeichnen bitte darauf achten, dass die Gebäude rechtwinklig sind. Diese Garagen haben zum Teil schiefe Wände. ID kann dies Drücken von q automatisch erledigen. Ggf. andere Häuser etwas verschieben, die Garage... commented 2025-10-26 17:32:30 UTC by limes11 ♦962 |
| 153791714 (Comments: 4) | MappSurfer (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hallo Mappsurfer Du hast bei einigen Wegweisern ein fixme mit namen und position eingetragen. Darf man wissen, wie du auf die Namen gekommen bist? commented 2025-10-26 17:29:24 UTC by Piagno ♦112 |
| 173805453 (Comments: 1) | Pivot007 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ruim commented 2025-10-26 17:28:06 UTC by Gustav Maps ♦1 |
| 173714011 (Comments: 1) | GKremp (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo GKremp, warum ergänzt Du an Straßen/Wege ""bridge:name" ? ""bridge:name" kommt nur an Straßen/Wege wo die Brücke nicht als separat gemapptes Bauwerk "man_made=bridge" gemappt ist.... commented 2025-10-26 17:27:01 UTC by Zrop ♦106 |
| 173797795 (Comments: 4) | GewoonStephan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Yep Ik heb al wat aangepast. Je kunt ook de vorm van het dak toevoegen en het aantal verdiepingen. Dan krijg je straks een 3d beeld. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=52.0479054&lon=5.6223937&zoom=18 commented 2025-10-26 17:11:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173803996 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 452) | This is a Potlatch revisit of the iD editing done in 173756742 through 173759875. Everything in here was either not possible to do in iD or wasn't done because the track display in iD wasn't clear enough. commented 2025-10-26 17:08:16 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 164648986 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 16:58:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173787905 (Comments: 17) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Maak er maar gewoon dat park van. No problem. Je kunt trouwens in OSM ook een opmerking oo de kaart zetten.. en we hebben nog het forum als vraagbaak. commented 2025-10-26 16:45:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173795929 (Comments: 2) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 8) | Top, bedankt. commented 2025-10-26 16:39:11 UTC by NikoStruiksma ♦1 |
| 173802365 (Comments: 2) | Lusent (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is also a new black mailbox for this address on the road at GPS approx. 36.852957453323015 -81.74456238258507 commented 2025-10-26 16:24:38 UTC by Lusent ♦1 |
| 173355976 (Comments: 1) | DazzaG24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice! Thank you for your local knowledge updates. Happy mapping. commented 2025-10-26 16:19:17 UTC by Firefishy ♦297 |
| 173448618 (Comments: 1) | Notume (Discussed changesets: 1) | Awesome set of updates. Thank you. commented 2025-10-26 16:18:33 UTC by Firefishy ♦297 |
| 159812869 (Comments: 2) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ahoj, tie tagy tato cesta zdedila z cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76561334, ktora sa povodne tahala od jednej krizovatky az k druhej, ale musel som ju rozdelit kvoli zmene povrchu na jednom useku. Na zapadnom konci je akurat znacka z... commented 2025-10-26 16:08:39 UTC by ticho2 ♦22 |
| 173800768 (Comments: 1) | Daniil Musatov (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13259774525#map=19/55.752318/37.608390&layers=N тут как будто задвоилось. или это разные объекты? commented 2025-10-26 16:02:50 UTC by literan ♦6,844 |
| 173794178 (Comments: 2) | GewoonStephan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ook svp geen adresgegevens op een gebouwomtrek zetten. Er zijn adresnodes. Ik pas even wat aan. commented 2025-10-26 16:01:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 41718308 (Comments: 1) | GewoonStephan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Na jaren weer een edit , maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community <... commented 2025-10-26 15:57:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173796398 (Comments: 1) | qoro (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Thanks for updating canal names. Could you please replace English name in the name tag with Georgian one? Englosh name should be kept in the name:en tag. Also, it would be great if you check all parts of Tsia Canal to the South f... commented 2025-10-26 15:53:18 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦200 |
| 173796607 (Comments: 1) | Zomerzicht (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi, Je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173796607 Waarschijnlijk bedoel je destination ipv designated. Dan gaat het juist routeren voor motorvoertuigen. Ik pas even wat aan en verwijder access=private, want motor_ve... commented 2025-10-26 15:50:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 168353198 (Comments: 4) | Dee Kaart (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oh. May I suggest two things, to help everyone? 1/ It would help enormously to say that you had made the correction in your initial comment. In this case, I spent a while hunting for a mistake which no longer exists. ("joined" platforms... commented 2025-10-26 15:49:37 UTC by Dee Kaart ♦3 |
| 173796236 (Comments: 1) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 8) | Lijkt me oke nu met disused tagging commented 2025-10-26 15:45:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173795027 (Comments: 2) | limamoka (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #173800105 Ik heb je wijziging moeten terugdraaien. Het klopt gewoon niet. Er zijn hier geen fietspaden. Zie ook de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane MVG eggie MVG eggie |
| 173793684 (Comments: 1) | limamoka (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Kennelijk delen meer bedrijven hetzelfde adres. Dat zou kunnen. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 173723254 (Comments: 1) | spiregrain (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-26 15:13:21 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645 |
| 173793257 (Comments: 1) | Vivian76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-26 15:11:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173798620 (Comments: 2) | 00Abdo youssef (Discussed changesets: 1) | استناداً إلى تحريراتك على الخريطة في هذا المجموعة من التغييرات، قمت بتصميم اقتراح لما قد يبدو عليه تعليق: "أضفت رقم المنزل و تفاصيل الا... commented 2025-10-26 15:07:09 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 170039070 (Comments: 2) | shorelessriver25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oui, je viens de passer devant, ça existe toujours. C'est dimanche donc c'est fermé mais c'est clairement actif. commented 2025-10-26 15:06:52 UTC by shorelessriver25 ♦1 |
| 173783935 (Comments: 3) | Daniel-Krumbach (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke commented 2025-10-26 14:53:42 UTC by looniverse ♦9 |
| 173782394 (Comments: 2) | lukbas (Discussed changesets: 22) | Cześć Wcześniej obiekt był oznaczony jako budynek ogólny i był poprawiony na szkolny. Już poprawiono na sala sportowa. Dzięki za zauważenie . Pozdrawiam commented 2025-10-26 14:52:40 UTC by lukbas ♦19 |
| 168938593 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 418) | Z tego co pamiętam, na discordzie umówiliśmy się na niedodawanie boundary=religious_administration do lini wchodzących w skład relacji. commented 2025-10-26 14:50:08 UTC by SpinOff ♦323 |
| 173724435 (Comments: 1) | Camilo Nuñez Castro (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hola Camilo. Veo que hace tiempo no revisas el telegram. Al SII hay que tenerle paciencia a veces. Si bien te creo que aparece la palabra "presidente" por ahí, es un nombre alternativo quizas. porque los carteles en terreno es... commented 2025-10-26 14:40:19 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173786744 (Comments: 1) | GKremp (Discussed changesets: 8) | bridge:name ist nur nötig, wenn die Brücke nicht als Umriss bzw. als Relation hinzugefügt ist und die Daten dadurch ersichtlich sind, alles andere ist ein Doppeleintrag, welches das Bearbeiten (z.B. Namenswechsel) unnötig erschwer... commented 2025-10-26 14:21:39 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦232 |
| 173738604 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 195) | OSM doesn't exactly have a threshold for how much population a place needs to be classified as a city. Wyoming has no cities that come close to passing 100k in population, but has 10 places tagged as cities in OSM. Colorado itself has a notable ... commented 2025-10-26 14:11:29 UTC by Joseph R P ♦378 |
| 173677638 (Comments: 1) | dathoschy (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hallo, bitte prüfe die "socket" tags. "ccs" ist kein gültiger Steckertyp. commented 2025-10-26 14:08:02 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 173795940 (Comments: 4) | Kancelaria 3DC – Przemysław Ochal Doradca Restrukturyzacyjny Syndyk Upadłość Konsumencka (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok commented 2025-10-26 14:07:13 UTC by Kancelaria 3DC – Przemysław Ochal Doradca Restrukturyzacyjny Syndyk Upadłość Konsumencka ♦1 |
| 173617074 (Comments: 2) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 138) | Hi, du hast Post.🙋 commented 2025-10-26 13:59:44 UTC by surveyor54 ♦659 |
| 173762254 (Comments: 6) | Zomerzicht (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oke.. Nu komt iemand aan zuidkant uit dat bos wandelen en komt uit op die landbouwweg. Dat routeert dan niet meer met access=private. Dan dus toevoegen foot=permissive. Dan routeert het weer over de Eigen Weg Verder voor motorvoertuigen zal het... commented 2025-10-26 13:46:43 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173794282 (Comments: 1) | stefciostefcio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-26 13:30:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173752617 (Comments: 3) | azrael_83 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Aber bei beiden gilt: Vertrauen ist gut - Kontrolle ist besser ;-) Vor Ort oder aktuelles DOP ist meist die aktuellste Quelle. MG ALKIS hat meist die aktuelleren Hausnummern .. commented 2025-10-26 13:27:16 UTC by tux67 ♦1,982 |
| 172618754 (Comments: 2) | katpatuka (Discussed changesets: 121) | See also discussion under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173743165 commented 2025-10-26 13:24:26 UTC by katpatuka ♦200 |
| 173793400 (Comments: 1) | stefciostefcio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-26 13:11:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173783698 (Comments: 2) | azrael_83 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, alles klar, danke dir! commented 2025-10-26 13:10:35 UTC by azrael_83 ♦3 |
| 138366563 (Comments: 3) | DomenicoCacace (Discussed changesets: 5) | Capito grazie, ho corretto quel che ho potuto. Buon mapping a te! commented 2025-10-26 13:09:15 UTC by baprischka ♦30 |
| 172634325 (Comments: 5) | Päscl🛞🐱🛞💨 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Päscl🛞🐱🛞💨, die von dir genannte Quelle ist leider keine zulässige Quelle, da uns DB InfraGO keine Erlaubnis zur Nutzung erteilt hat und die Inhalte unter das Datenbankschutzrecht fallen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-10-26 12:54:25 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,161 |
| 92999265 (Comments: 2) | DaCor (Discussed changesets: 19) | I no longer engage in discussions on OSM. If you wish to make an edit, make it. Don't message me. Nothing personal, I just don't bother discussing map stuff anymore and just do my own thing. Thanks commented 2025-10-26 12:52:22 UTC by DaCor ♦56 |
| 173789655 (Comments: 2) | Huib van N (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dankjewel! Leuk om te kunnen bijdragen aan een nuttig project waar ik al regelmatig gebruikte. Ik zal de tips bekijken. Groet, Huib commented 2025-10-26 12:51:14 UTC by Huib van N ♦1 |
| 173768002 (Comments: 2) | 02826029060144502929130510688601237 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wilhelmshof - Saal (anmietbar) Tel.: +493589177910 commented 2025-10-26 12:50:58 UTC by 02826029060144502929130510688601237 ♦3 |
| 173766887 (Comments: 2) | 02826029060144502929130510688601237 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dann werde ich NACH meinem Urlaub die Breite ausmessen, OK. commented 2025-10-26 12:48:45 UTC by 02826029060144502929130510688601237 ♦3 |
| 148559922 (Comments: 2) | airwolfke (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi thanks for you feedback, feel free to change it, I probably have added the during summer. I'm in the region next week and If I have the change I'll bring a visit. commented 2025-10-26 12:47:46 UTC by airwolfke ♦1 |
| 173792870 (Comments: 2) | zhanserik001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | На основе твоих правок карты в этом наборе изменений, я составил предложение для того, как мог бы выглядеть комментарий: "Добавлены до... commented 2025-10-26 12:46:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173750393 (Comments: 2) | bergfrei (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hallo user 5359, Danke für Info, Fehler korrigiert, "name=Zillenbachweg" Gruß bergfrei commented 2025-10-26 12:46:38 UTC by bergfrei ♦46 |
| 173493224 (Comments: 1) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 9) | Note on adding track/access roads on private farmland - please make sure to mark the access as "private" as these are not publicly accessible paths (off South Branch Rd near Norz Hill Farm) - thanks. commented 2025-10-26 12:43:08 UTC by vngx32 ♦2 |
| 173765025 (Comments: 2) | 02826029060144502929130510688601237 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Wenn es um die Hausnummern 30 - 24 geht, ist meine Löschung völlig korrekt, der Gebäudekomplex (Barracke) wird ABGERISSEN. Wenn man wie ich live vor Ort ist, sieht man, dass nicht mehr viel übrig ist. commented 2025-10-26 12:42:06 UTC by 02826029060144502929130510688601237 ♦3 |
| 172849169 (Comments: 3) | Adze1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | I've double checked and there is also an InPost locker, remapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173792812 commented 2025-10-26 12:39:24 UTC by lakedistrict ♦312 |
| 173406470 (Comments: 1) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 261) | What are these changes for? Especially around the new parking space area I do not understand why they were made. This changeset reverts to a state that does not take recent restructuring into account. commented 2025-10-26 12:30:54 UTC by simgood ♦3 |
| 173790408 (Comments: 4) | Zomerzicht (Discussed changesets: 7) | Er is juridisch verschil tussen Eigen Weg en wegen met Verboden toegang. Op een Eigen Weg mag je gewoon wandelen of fietsen. De eigenaar is wel gerechtigd je de toegang te allen tijde te ontzeggen. Het is dus niet Verboden Toegang. We taggen d... commented 2025-10-26 12:28:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173790027 (Comments: 3) | Zomerzicht (Discussed changesets: 7) | Maar beste Zomerzicht. Nu je de weg hebt verwijderd zullen fietsers toch nog steeds naar binnen fietsen. Dat doen ze toch niet op grond van een kaart waar je ziet dat het gewoon een oprit is. Aan de kaart wordt nog steeds gewerkt. Mapowr zullen... commented 2025-10-26 12:22:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173786423 (Comments: 1) | santi8ago8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Google Earth is copyrighted so we must not use it's images to map to OSM. The road is on the imagery available to OSM so I've mapped the road to the line on Bing imagery. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-10-26 12:20:14 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948 |
| 164736884 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 12:13:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173791877 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 356) | commentaar moet zijn: nodes verwijderd commented 2025-10-26 12:13:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173775409 (Comments: 1) | Kovács Ervin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Szia! Erre inkább a disused: prefix illik. Ha az épület áll, de az üzlet üres benne, akkor a shop=supermarket-et csak javítsd át disused:shop=supermarket-re: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki... commented 2025-10-26 12:10:33 UTC by infeeeee ♦596 |
| 134866928 (Comments: 1) | kasztelan111 (Discussed changesets: 108) | Cześć, skąd pochodzi nazwa "Targowa"? commented 2025-10-26 12:04:19 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
| 173781453 (Comments: 2) | rusjanis (Discussed changesets: 10) | Skaidrs Paldies 👍😊 Par CSN atļauts braukt sabiedriskajam īsti nezinu. Labi, likšu tava piemēra detalizētās vērtības. commented 2025-10-26 12:02:10 UTC by rusjanis ♦8 |
| 173592673 (Comments: 8) | rap12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please open the response, the firm is true because i use is commented 2025-10-26 12:01:55 UTC by rap12 ♦1 |
| 173791145 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 182) | urwało początek - niewiele zostało z tej... commented 2025-10-26 11:54:01 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
| 173741741 (Comments: 4) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 117) | Due to local garbage collation issues, it is important to know how may recycling containers of each colour there are. recycling:glass_bottles:count could work for the green containers, but not for the yellow (plastic packaging + cans). ... commented 2025-10-26 11:51:18 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦727 |
| 173790123 (Comments: 1) | KarolJarosz (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-26 11:41:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173790144 (Comments: 1) | KarolJarosz (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-26 11:41:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173790445 (Comments: 1) | KarolJarosz (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-26 11:41:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 170678148 (Comments: 2) | phlow666 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, das passt. Wichtig ist nur, dass Rad fahren da raus genommen wird. Grüße commented 2025-10-26 11:33:50 UTC by phlow666 ♦1 |
| 173783474 (Comments: 1) | Jejko02 (Discussed changesets: 61) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-26 11:32:15 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173786708 (Comments: 2) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ето по този блок - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26667813/ - не сте правил промени. Има 14 етажа и https://osmbuildings.org/ приема, че е с височина 42 м. commented 2025-10-26 11:27:44 UTC by Fraxi ♦169 |
| 173789835 (Comments: 2) | Mohsen Khademi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Computer hardware and networking store" commented 2025-10-26 11:27:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173785045 (Comments: 1) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-26 11:27:11 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173789657 (Comments: 2) | Peppepaolo (Discussed changesets: 1) | In base alle tue modifiche alla mappa in questo set di modifiche, ho elaborato una proposta per come potrebbe apparire un commento: "Aggiunta area di prateria" (Auto-translation) --- Based on your map edits in this changeset, I&rsq... commented 2025-10-26 11:27:10 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173789256 (Comments: 1) | Herman van Rink (Discussed changesets: 2) | review_requested \tyes Hoi Lijkt me oke zo. Groet eggie commented 2025-10-26 11:16:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173787937 (Comments: 1) | DaniCatGames (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-26 11:13:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 172893875 (Comments: 5) | WindOfHope (Discussed changesets: 1) | понял буду пробовать.Благодарю commented 2025-10-26 11:11:03 UTC by WindOfHope ♦1 |
| X | 173787079 (Comments: 1) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hier is het toch fout gedaan. Ik heb het weer hersteld, wamt ik dacht dat het een fout van mij was. Wat je insluit zijn de inners en de buitenste polygoon is de outer. Bij elkaar heet dat dan een multipolygoonrelatie. Het is inderdaad i... commented 2025-10-26 11:10:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173782938 (Comments: 5) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Voor mij kennelijk ook niet. Ik heb die vijver en dat bloembed nog even gecorrigeerd naar inner. commented 2025-10-26 11:05:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173771241 (Comments: 3) | c-the-world (Discussed changesets: 3) | Already fixed, thank you. Also added "description" from their poster next to the residential entrance. And again, thanks for helping us out with the POIs, it is really appreciated! commented 2025-10-26 11:02:24 UTC by brdrsrsu ♦9 |
| 173760966 (Comments: 2) | sky-is-here (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, better to keep only description:en if you can't provide descrption in Georgian. commented 2025-10-26 11:01:39 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦200 |
| 173664204 (Comments: 2) | Gino-52 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hallo user_5359, danke für den Hinweis. War einfach ein Fehler. Sollte traffic_sign=DE:240 sein. Gruß Gino commented 2025-10-26 10:52:52 UTC by Gino-52 ♦74 |
| 173774303 (Comments: 2) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 136) | Hi, Thanks for that. :) The hazards of too much mapping in one day. :( commented 2025-10-26 10:43:55 UTC by VictorIE ♦952 |
| 173787811 (Comments: 1) | wilczywilk (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. "św. Rafała Kalinowskiego": https://www.open... commented 2025-10-26 10:40:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173572874 (Comments: 3) | LidaCity (Discussed changesets: 21) | Хочу о том же попросить) не удаляй пожалуйста теги у магазинов с disused:shop=convenience. Я в любом случае, даже если магазин уже закрыт оставляю тег... commented 2025-10-26 10:38:36 UTC by Vodevil_Mark ♦13 |
| 173658612 (Comments: 1) | bandello (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, "terrace" might not be the right tag in OSM. "terrace" refers to a place to sit at in the front of a building. "terraced" is building style. Maybe you can check for a better tag - I can't come up wi... commented 2025-10-26 10:37:29 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 173691611 (Comments: 1) | Zybi6 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hej. Dodałeś tunel ale nałożyłeś go na istniejącą linię strumienia. W takich przypadkach trzeba przeciąć istniejącą linię i jej fragment oznaczyć jako tunel, tak aby linie się na siebie nie nakładały. Jakby co poprawiłem już ten t... commented 2025-10-26 10:37:11 UTC by SpinOff ♦323 |
 | 173606857 (Comments: 1) | cnvery (Discussed changesets: 37) | 为什么要在中国的土地上加英文？ commented 2025-10-26 10:37:00 UTC by Taksine ♦119 |
| 173664726 (Comments: 1) | oecher2012 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen zurück bei OSM! Kleiner Hinweis: Bei kopieren aus dem Wiki bitte darauf achten, dass der Prefix Key: (bzw. Tag:) entfernt wird. Danke für Deine Ergänzung. commented 2025-10-26 10:25:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173764128 (Comments: 3) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 197) | Na asfalcie są rowery wymalowane to znaku nie będzie. commented 2025-10-26 10:21:33 UTC by Adam_Piszczek ♦178 |
| 173575018 (Comments: 3) | شرکت فرتاک الکتریک آسیا (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173787199 commented 2025-10-26 10:19:58 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173577323 (Comments: 4) | jrstubbs (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173580026 commented 2025-10-26 10:19:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173646123 (Comments: 1) | Ruben Van de Velde (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi, what's wrong with this relation, apart from not being complete? It might be better to have it in a usable state instead of prefixing every key with an undocumented "incomplete". commented 2025-10-26 10:18:16 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 173593947 (Comments: 3) | mybelcar (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173787097 commented 2025-10-26 10:17:39 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 155984391 (Comments: 2) | Rogoyski (Discussed changesets: 63) | Dzięki. Złapałem się już parę razy na takich przypadkach i staram się pilnować, zwłaszcza przy gastronomii, która często ma takie dodatkowe tagi, których EveryDoor nie kasuje. Ale pewnie wciąż się zdarza, że nie ... commented 2025-10-26 10:17:16 UTC by Rogoyski ♦231 |
| 173612007 (Comments: 3) | Best Horizons (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173615529 commented 2025-10-26 10:16:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173612465 (Comments: 3) | Trusted Heating & Air Conditioning (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637880 commented 2025-10-26 10:15:36 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173621915 (Comments: 3) | Jersey Behavioral Health (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637387 commented 2025-10-26 10:15:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173786133 (Comments: 7) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Nee... editor iD is beperkt. Die editor vindt het al snel goed. Ik kijk met josm. Die geeft zelfs een waarschuwing bij upload. commented 2025-10-26 10:15:05 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173622667 (Comments: 4) | kinggatesbuilders (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637254 commented 2025-10-26 10:14:48 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173623076 (Comments: 3) | HDAO Group (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786950 commented 2025-10-26 10:14:06 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173628487 (Comments: 3) | Door Pros (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173636875 commented 2025-10-26 10:13:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173641021 (Comments: 4) | cubski (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173641551 commented 2025-10-26 10:12:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173654141 (Comments: 4) | davewarrencdjr (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173657427 commented 2025-10-26 10:11:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173659284 (Comments: 3) | Thomas Hodgkiss (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173681642 commented 2025-10-26 10:10:56 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173661333 (Comments: 5) | latis education (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173661960 commented 2025-10-26 10:10:21 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173668575 (Comments: 3) | Southern VIP & Foot Rescue Surgery Center Fulton KY (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173680482 commented 2025-10-26 10:09:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173671349 (Comments: 3) | Valence coatings (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173786696 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-26 10:08:39 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173672944 (Comments: 3) | Dr Thomas Hodgkiss (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786659 commented 2025-10-26 10:07:56 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173717590 (Comments: 1) | Rapsak1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/4787423. I correct your typo sodwqlk:both:smoothness to sidewalk:both:smoothness. But the real question is why is sidewalk:both used at all for sidewalk=left? commented 2025-10-26 10:07:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173703648 (Comments: 3) | Desaihealth (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173717592 commented 2025-10-26 10:06:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173705767 (Comments: 4) | Mistrz Wizytówki - Pozycjonowanie Wizytówki Google (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173705985 commented 2025-10-26 10:05:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173708768 (Comments: 4) | Vicente Camarasa Cerrajeros (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173723457 commented 2025-10-26 10:04:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173742093 (Comments: 3) | Jerrit Burgess (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786465 commented 2025-10-26 10:03:57 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173636854 (Comments: 1) | drebelo40 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you describe what is / what is not allowed at this point? The tags are unfortunately not correct. commented 2025-10-26 10:03:56 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 167974619 (Comments: 2) | shagazan (Discussed changesets: 2) | voir note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5022440 commented 2025-10-26 10:03:42 UTC by Patchanka ♦409 |
| 173742371 (Comments: 3) | OnPoint Solar Panel Cleaning Encinitas (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173743111 commented 2025-10-26 10:03:29 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173743357 (Comments: 4) | Shane Adam Thompson (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173764259 commented 2025-10-26 10:02:53 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173754929 (Comments: 3) | Heliodore Houenou (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173768882 commented 2025-10-26 10:00:52 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173774132 (Comments: 3) | lure357 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173774382 commented 2025-10-26 10:00:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173769166 (Comments: 1) | Goldschmiede Hinrichsmeyer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Goldschmiede Hinrichsmeyer, willkommen bei OSM und danke für's Update. Gruß tux67 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173769166 commented 2025-10-26 09:58:39 UTC by tux67 ♦1,982 |
| 173766788 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 283) | Moze być i forest, generalnie była biała plama więc na szybko wziąłem scrub. Ale można zmienić commented 2025-10-26 09:58:01 UTC by syntex ♦886 |
| 164815331 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 09:56:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 164866765 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 09:52:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173784846 (Comments: 1) | Rössler (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gehe davon aus, daß St 2177 bis zur endgueltigen Fertigstellung weiter durch den Ort verlaeuft. Es fehlen: Regenrueckhaltebecken Richtung Kreuzweiher, neue landwirtschaftliche Wege und deren Zufahrten, ... commented 2025-10-26 09:50:22 UTC by Rössler ♦3 |
| 159318394 (Comments: 2) | Voonosm (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ich glaub, das war aus einem Wanderbeschrieb. Jemand der "alte Wege" lief, aber frag mich nicht mehr woher ich das hatte. Evtl hab ich vergessen, das Ding auf abandoned:highway zu setzen. commented 2025-10-26 09:46:15 UTC by Voonosm ♦12 |
| 173686070 (Comments: 7) | azrael_83 (Discussed changesets: 3) | p.s: da ich hier im weiteren Umfeld auch QS mache, könnte noch der ein oder andere Hinweis von mir kommen .. wenn das ok ist. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Qualit%C3%A4tssicherung commented 2025-10-26 09:45:54 UTC by tux67 ♦1,982 |
| 164907153 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 09:39:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 130147218 (Comments: 2) | guerda (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo mueschel, danke für den Hinweis, werde ich korrigieren. commented 2025-10-26 09:37:01 UTC by guerda ♦20 |
| 173772069 (Comments: 1) | noam15A (Discussed changesets: 2) | העדכון לגן נראה טוב! זכור לי במעומעם שיש עמדת תיקון אופניים בפארק הזה. אתה יכול לאמת? אם כן אפשר להוסיף נקודה חדשה מסוג "Bicycle Repair Tool Stand"... commented 2025-10-26 09:33:05 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656 |
| 173743165 (Comments: 3) | katpatuka (Discussed changesets: 121) | In cases where a place=* represents an administrative village (行政村) division rather than a physical settlement, the character '村' should be retained in the name, though whether to retain such place=* feature remains a matter of deba... commented 2025-10-26 09:24:09 UTC by Lepuse ♦30 |
| 164924030 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 09:23:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173752043 (Comments: 3) | theophrastos (Discussed changesets: 45) | Guten Morgen Klaus, danke für deine Erläuterungen. Offenbar bist du bis jetzt der Einzige, der diesen Schlüssel anwendet. Ich habe weltweit danach gesucht. Nur rund 500 Treffer in Deutschland gefunden, die auch wohl alle von dir... commented 2025-10-26 09:23:28 UTC by george1201 ♦237 |
| 164924209 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 09:23:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 164944494 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 09:19:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 164950629 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 09:19:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 164995896 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 09:18:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172050009 (Comments: 7) | sahealy30 (Discussed changesets: 7) | @sahealy30, bitte nicht auf der Grundlage von Ankündigungen, Verdacht und veralteten Luftbilder mappen. Vor-Ort-Kenntniss ist angesagt. Gruß. ALu68 commented 2025-10-26 09:17:33 UTC by ALu68 ♦361 |
| 173765579 (Comments: 1) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 283) | Na poligon da się wejść z racji na brak ostrzeżenia od wschodniej strony, więc utwardzone drogi faktycznie lepiej wyglądają z ustawionym ograniczeniem dostępu. commented 2025-10-26 09:09:22 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267 |
| 173682622 (Comments: 13) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ich lade dich nach https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zuviel-des-guten-bei-der-multipolygon-nutzung/ ein. Dort wird aktuell auch über die Verwendung von MPen diskutiert. commented 2025-10-26 09:04:37 UTC by aixbrick ♦868 |
| 164997721 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:58:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173759349 (Comments: 1) | dypa (Discussed changesets: 16) | Добрый день! Спасибо, буду внимательнее commented 2025-10-26 08:56:30 UTC by Ozon OSM16 ♦3 |
| 173773028 (Comments: 1) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 175) | Moin :) kleiner Hinweis vielleicht: Du hast hier min. 1 administrative boundary mit physischen Objekten verbunden. Vielleicht blendest du Grenzen beim Bearbeiten ganz aus, dann passiert das nicht. happy mapping --- |
| 172512514 (Comments: 3) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 89) | Thanks for fixing it, sorry from the outside it looked like apartments but I didn't check any signs or entrances. commented 2025-10-26 08:49:27 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842 |
| 165041443 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:48:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165120944 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:48:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165032366 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:48:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165140757 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:47:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165267572 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:47:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165474292 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:46:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165493096 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:46:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173671933 (Comments: 3) | Marc Mongenet (Discussed changesets: 21) | OK, si c'est "officiellement" pastorale on peut la laisser en track ; d'autant plus si ça correspond aux pratiques locales. Je ne suis pas un local de l'étape donc je ne vais pas y toucher. Le mieux serait... commented 2025-10-26 08:44:14 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦41 |
| 173783187 (Comments: 1) | Vinterling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. .. format phone aangepast naar +31 MVG, Eggie Name... commented 2025-10-26 08:37:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 171359188 (Comments: 1) | Adam-Eye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Adam-Eye, could I ask what made you think Wickes in Taunton had closed? commented 2025-10-26 08:33:12 UTC by UKChris ♦44 |
| 165517713 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:33:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165532288 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:33:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165534518 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:33:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173310080 (Comments: 2) | lawrencebanks (Discussed changesets: 27) | DNVTM is a trunk road only from DN59 to DN6-A1 in the absence of any express road or motorway (the future A9) - as Romania has express roads now and motorways usually take the trunk traffic from the national roads (see DN69 Timisoara-Arad, DN7 Arad-D... commented 2025-10-26 08:31:47 UTC by lawrencebanks ♦18 |
| 171919406 (Comments: 3) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 129) | Thanks Robert, I see now what you mean, a previous edit marked Wickes as disused, which was inaccurate. commented 2025-10-26 08:31:21 UTC by UKChris ♦44 |
| 173706307 (Comments: 4) | BakedCake02 (Discussed changesets: 4) | corr....All these comments are in relation to the Moree Met Office area. commented 2025-10-26 08:30:13 UTC by nevw ♦2,063 |
| 173782932 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 551) | dalsze naprawy w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173783031 commented 2025-10-26 08:21:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165637706 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:16:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165845737 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:13:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173777632 (Comments: 1) | Loweball (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please check that the entry is correct. The aerial photograph shows a damaged building with poor transport links. commented 2025-10-26 08:09:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173782616 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 551) | próby dalszej poprawy w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173782716 commented 2025-10-26 08:08:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166334451 (Comments: 1) | ompatekar (Discussed changesets: 14) | Last time I was here I didn't remember seeing any sign indicating a turn restriction (will look again when I next visit) . What source was used for this edit ? commented 2025-10-26 08:08:23 UTC by TheLNL ♦10 |
| 173769603 (Comments: 1) | NC Locksmith Experts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-10-26 08:05:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 166155176 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:04:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166118402 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:04:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166118608 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:04:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166027495 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:04:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165998116 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:04:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 165997471 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:04:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166160526 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 08:03:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166161158 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:59:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166161743 (Comments: 3) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:59:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166189133 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:58:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166258649 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:57:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166269616 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:57:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173670711 (Comments: 3) | wbecker123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, OK: Jetzt seh ich es auch auf der Karte von der Stadt. ;-) Hätte ich genauer hinschauen sollen. Danke für´s Korrigieren. commented 2025-10-26 07:55:04 UTC by disc24 ♦31 |
| 166537660 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:52:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173781031 (Comments: 1) | aerth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag earth Bedenk dat bezorgdiensten hier ook niet meer routeren. Je zou ook permissive kunnen gebruiken ipv private Dan routeert het wel. Welke bebording staat vooraan de straat? MVG eggie commented 2025-10-26 07:51:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173780916 (Comments: 1) | aerth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Ik heb wat aangepast hier. Het is geen residentialroad. Het parkeerterrein op private gezet. MVG, Eggie Nam... commented 2025-10-26 07:47:46 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 166581844 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:45:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166618162 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:45:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 166652653 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:42:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173780082 (Comments: 1) | camman29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11646934645 (a tree) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! Please have also a look on https://w... commented 2025-10-26 07:42:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173752744 (Comments: 2) | CaptainCarte (Discussed changesets: 38) | das kann ich ändern commented 2025-10-26 07:29:35 UTC by CaptainCarte ♦17 |
| 166836155 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:28:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 168175333 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-26 07:28:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173765897 (Comments: 4) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 342) | Als ik naar de indruk van hun website kijk, krijg ik de indruk dat al hun winkels shop=cheese zijn, of shop=deli als de kaas meer in balans is met de worst en nootjes. (In Leeuwarden zitten worst en kaas dan toevallig gescheiden.) > Een moo... commented 2025-10-26 07:24:14 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦681 |
| 173642077 (Comments: 2) | Atmayoni das (Discussed changesets: 5) | спасибо. теперь буду знать. тоже что-то такое думал. Это ИИ подсказал так сделать. commented 2025-10-26 06:15:43 UTC by Atmayoni das ♦5 |
| 173711154 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bitte nicht die Gebäudeumrisse verschieben beim Verbinden mit Wegen oder Flächen. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173711154#21/51.51464/7.32064 Straßenflächen, wenn du sie so einträgst, sollten... commented 2025-10-26 06:02:09 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 173709923 (Comments: 1) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Kein parking=lane. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking=lane https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side commented 2025-10-26 05:56:44 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 173669509 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 15) | demolished:building=yes commented 2025-10-26 05:46:54 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 173699748 (Comments: 3) | FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Wege übereinander zu legen ist keine Lösung. Weg aufsplitten oder vom Verbindungspunkt trennen und verkürzen. Bitte die "Hilfe"-Sektion im iD-Editor durchlesen. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... commented 2025-10-26 05:44:07 UTC by Bienson ♦351 |
| 173727701 (Comments: 1) | SD Mapman (Discussed changesets: 30) | Great job, looks like we’re almost done with all the townships East River! commented 2025-10-26 05:35:24 UTC by Molandfreak ♦13 |
| X | 173750946 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | please keep changesets to one continent commented 2025-10-26 03:30:07 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| X | 173751070 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | please keep changesets to one continent commented 2025-10-26 03:29:56 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| X | 173751071 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | please keep changesets to one continent commented 2025-10-26 03:29:42 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| X | 173751069 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | please keep changesets to one continent commented 2025-10-26 03:29:07 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| X | 173751127 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | please keep changesets to one continent commented 2025-10-26 03:28:42 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| X | 173751129 (Comments: 1) | LeMa😃 (Discussed changesets: 12) | please keep changesets to one continent or area commented 2025-10-26 03:28:24 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| 162002452 (Comments: 2) | Donnut (Discussed changesets: 2) | I did not intend to address the last comment to you. commented 2025-10-26 02:30:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 43424535 (Comments: 1) | osm_saint-louis (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello, Why did you tag the highways in this area the way you did? e.g. in way 402672543 you changed your own tagging between versions 6 & 10. commented 2025-10-26 02:29:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 173563170 (Comments: 4) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 197) | Hola Agus, buenas noches. En efecto, no fue como en el caso de Moreno, igual entiendo que lo hayas pensado de esa manera. Quilmes Este se lo nombra como "Quilmes", lo mismo pasa con Bernal y Ezpeleta. Banco poner el alt_name. Y graci... commented 2025-10-26 01:35:54 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦18 |
| 173771045 (Comments: 1) | fudoreaper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Did you notice that the esri images got updated for winnipeg? Thought you might be interested to know! commented 2025-10-26 01:32:26 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦41 |
| 173776604 (Comments: 1) | S-zation (Discussed changesets: 32) | reverted by c/s 173777252 after additional research commented 2025-10-26 01:22:03 UTC by S-zation ♦117 |
| 65826787 (Comments: 1) | CartONG_Imports (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I would be very thankful to have water in the destert, but this looks like a potential typo. Are these water tanks really named thank {number}? commented 2025-10-26 01:15:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 172367218 (Comments: 1) | johnmogi (Discussed changesets: 27) | johnmogi, Conforme consta na Wiki, uma ponte não deve conectar mais de um segmento de estrada em qualquer de suas pontas. Portanto, geometrias como a seguinte, deve prevalecer. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974140885 N... commented 2025-10-26 01:13:11 UTC by santamariense ♦828 |
| 173764732 (Comments: 1) | Lino Mario Cabrera (Discussed changesets: 10) | hmmm.... el nombre de esta "avenida villarroel" es maría barzola? commented 2025-10-26 01:00:01 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,600 |
| 173655353 (Comments: 1) | CheeseSplatter (Discussed changesets: 1) | This has been reverted. Do not make massive, sweeping edits like this without consultation with the community or third-party review. Current road designations are based on City and CRD data. This is effectively vandalism and has been reported as such... commented 2025-10-26 00:50:32 UTC by InfiNorth ♦14 |
| 127975689 (Comments: 1) | Dhadams (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please do not make drastic, sweeping edits like this in a well mapped area without consulting the community. You have outright deleted an entire section of Shelbourne Street, added inappropriate redundant bike lanes, and broken a large number of rela... commented 2025-10-26 00:37:12 UTC by InfiNorth ♦14 |
| 173733446 (Comments: 1) | seakid6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: add the address to the house outline. Just select the outline in the editor and fill in the address fields. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173733446 commented 2025-10-26 00:19:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 162031932 (Comments: 5) | Saintry17 (Discussed changesets: 2) | They’ll always show, but the segments through the gates should prevent people from being routed through there. Heads up, though….there’s a lot of road construction going on in the port. commented 2025-10-25 23:44:46 UTC by txemt ♦75 |
| 173744766 (Comments: 1) | Szymiii (Discussed changesets: 13) | Podejrzewam, że deweloper zastrzega wszystkie prawa autorskie do tych materiałów. Nawet jeśli tego nie wyraża wprost, to przysługują mu automatycznie. Czy udzielona została licencja do tworzenia utworów zależnych na po... commented 2025-10-25 22:49:28 UTC by cielak42 ♦28 |
| 173766329 (Comments: 1) | Szymiii (Discussed changesets: 13) | Pytanie w kwestii źródła "dane od dewelopera przekazane podczas wizyty". Czy deweloper udzielił licencji na tworzenie map na podstawie tych danych, oraz na ich opublikowanie? Jeżeli nie, to te zmiany stanowią naruszenie praw aut... commented 2025-10-25 22:42:04 UTC by cielak42 ♦28 |
| 173774251 (Comments: 1) | charl3s (Discussed changesets: 194) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13256790677 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-10-25 22:31:27 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173733302 (Comments: 2) | MatveiKaKei (Discussed changesets: 2) | А ну да, спасибо за поправку! commented 2025-10-25 22:29:05 UTC by MatveiKaKei ♦2 |
| 173733027 (Comments: 4) | MatveiKaKei (Discussed changesets: 2) | На этот сайт зайти не смог потому что выдает ошибку но я зашёл через другой сайт и название подходит commented 2025-10-25 22:26:05 UTC by MatveiKaKei ♦2 |
| 173749773 (Comments: 1) | cyberatlas (Discussed changesets: 105) | Może chcesz zagłosować? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pl:Tag:highway=trunk#G%C5%82osowanie_-_2._tura commented 2025-10-25 22:22:37 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦295 |
| 173750964 (Comments: 1) | Elysee1021 (Discussed changesets: 2) | "уточнен тип объекта" но вы же просто убрали название (основное) и тег посадки на улице commented 2025-10-25 22:02:21 UTC by 4004 ♦1,913 |
| 161803589 (Comments: 1) | Mystik8973 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Does this Flock camera on Meriden Road in Wolcott still exist? I've checked mapillary.com streetview imagery from March 7, 2025 and did not see anything in front of the Hertz. Thank you! commented 2025-10-25 22:00:12 UTC by S-zation ♦117 |
| 173750515 (Comments: 2) | Elysee1021 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ну и, наверное, какие то помещения сдадут новым арендаторам, или они так и стоят? commented 2025-10-25 21:59:40 UTC by 4004 ♦1,913 |
| 173386365 (Comments: 2) | MayaDancer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Na pewno :) commented 2025-10-25 21:50:52 UTC by MayaDancer ♦2 |
| 173194397 (Comments: 1) | Mian Hamza Athar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dera Mian Hamza Athar commented 2025-10-25 21:43:58 UTC by Mian Hamza Athar ♦1 |
| 173711949 (Comments: 1) | GladGrip (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Gladgrip, Why did you change the brand/wikidata brand of Go Outdoors Express (Q131862654) to Go Outdoors? ( Q75293941). The former matches what the shop is actually called so I don't see why it needed to be changed. Best Regards... commented 2025-10-25 21:30:31 UTC by matt_ellery ♦77 |
| 173194528 (Comments: 5) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 53) | 👍 commented 2025-10-25 21:20:22 UTC by dafadllyn ♦70 |
| 173768809 (Comments: 1) | JS of A (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-25 20:47:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173624406 (Comments: 1) | StrikeMind (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted. please provide a source for major road deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173771486 commented 2025-10-25 20:30:38 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 173596867 (Comments: 4) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | I have recorded the first part of the real names with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173765139 and CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173770747. However, there is still a lot to do in this area. Sven commented 2025-10-25 20:14:21 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,090 |
| 173747997 (Comments: 1) | qq-aaa (Discussed changesets: 5) | 你好。在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173419593#c1499622 评论的基础上进行补充，与道路粘连的公交站应使用"public_transport=stop_position"而非"public_transport=platform"。鉴于此编辑是http... commented 2025-10-25 19:48:13 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦20 |
| 173600324 (Comments: 1) | Editor_S (Discussed changesets: 5) | Deze wijziging is incorrect. ALDI wordt met hoofdletters geschreven, ook in lopende tekst. Daarom heb ik de brand- en name-tags hersteld. De iD-editor geeft suggesties bij diverse winkelketens, maar let op: dit zijn slechts suggesties en geen ... commented 2025-10-25 19:38:44 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018 |
| 172439522 (Comments: 4) | vngx32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think there's some subjectivity, rather than a hard rule, whether driveway can be used when shared between two adjacent residences. There are plenty of examples in the forums and questions online where the OSM community supports using service/... commented 2025-10-25 19:32:31 UTC by vngx32 ♦2 |
| 173689794 (Comments: 1) | Mabema1 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola Mabema1, gracias por tus aportaciones a OpenStreetMap. Si vas a actualizar las líneas de bus, es conveniente que repases las directrices de la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses Con esta herramienta puedes encontrar ... commented 2025-10-25 19:15:37 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112 |
| 173503757 (Comments: 1) | pm54 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonsoir, J'ai vu que vous attaquiez un gros morceau suite à la refonte du réseau de transport sur Vitré/Châteaubourg. Je jardine depuis des années sur les bus en Bretagne, je peux vous donner un coup de ma... commented 2025-10-25 19:13:36 UTC by mga_geo ♦267 |
| 173766931 (Comments: 1) | wizerbar (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD commented 2025-10-25 19:07:25 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173197734 (Comments: 1) | ad08r (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-25 19:03:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173766884 (Comments: 1) | ad08r (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-25 19:02:58 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173768484 (Comments: 2) | :-} (Discussed changesets: 186) | Tego typu komentarz wystarczy commented 2025-10-25 19:00:23 UTC by :-} ♦192 |
| 173140301 (Comments: 1) | :-} (Discussed changesets: 186) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-25 18:57:40 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173273379 (Comments: 1) | :-} (Discussed changesets: 186) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-25 18:57:21 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 170089893 (Comments: 6) | Tomáš Odehnal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tady je středník dokonce jako součást URL. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53022111 Ale to je taková okrajová kuriozita, chápu že se tomu běžně nedá dobrat. commented 2025-10-25 18:56:13 UTC by martin-kokos ♦38 |
| 173761745 (Comments: 1) | Partsguy74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station commented 2025-10-25 18:53:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173766480 (Comments: 1) | Henk van Rens (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Henk, De format van de openingstijden klopte niet. Dagen van de week twee letters. Gebruik anders deze tool. openingsuren-tool http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ MVG eggie commented 2025-10-25 18:41:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 172822060 (Comments: 3) | Sébastien Santsch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yeah I know, but it is wrong to add not existing features to osm. Only because Openrailwaymap renders them, doesn't mean it's right. However they recently added support for the openhistoricalmap data. So this should be rendered in it as ... commented 2025-10-25 18:33:56 UTC by Piagno ♦112 |
| 173766391 (Comments: 1) | GerbenTim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-25 18:32:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173761142 (Comments: 1) | themapper53 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Are you going to add the deleted landuse back? Some of the deleted data was perfectly valid and some was mostly correct, and in my opinion there was no reason to delete it especially if you didn't add it back. If the data is 90% valid or complet... commented 2025-10-25 18:32:08 UTC by カシオペア ♦3 |
| 173763026 (Comments: 1) | KL63ant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-25 18:31:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 155058863 (Comments: 12) | karlrt (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you, and have a great dinner/weekend yourself! commented 2025-10-25 18:30:54 UTC by karlrt ♦9 |
| 173765374 (Comments: 2) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 29) | after a discussion with user commented 2025-10-25 18:27:00 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110 |
| 173766527 (Comments: 1) | Rcordero1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. I just want to apologize that I deleted your baseball diamond. The baseball field was already drawn and that's what we normally map for baseball pitches, and having two on top of each other is kind of confusing. If you wa... commented 2025-10-25 18:06:35 UTC by gpserror ♦224 |
| 173758117 (Comments: 1) | OSM FTW (Discussed changesets: 8) | Здравейте! Цялото това нещо-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444706122 - не ми се струва, че е паркинг, съдейки от сателитните снимки към края на май тази г... commented 2025-10-25 18:01:23 UTC by Fraxi ♦169 |
| 157023148 (Comments: 2) | Grzegorz Madrjas (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ten znak znów się pojawił :/ Przywróciłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173766429 commented 2025-10-25 17:40:48 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158 |
| 173766204 (Comments: 2) | 02826029060144502929130510688601237 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen in diesem Changeset habe ich einen Vorschlag für einen Kommentar erstellt, der so aussehen könnte: "Hinzu gefügt wurden Adressdetails, einschließlich Stadt, Postleitzahl, Hausnummern u... commented 2025-10-25 17:37:03 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 172817910 (Comments: 2) | SleepyAks (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nie. Jest z kostki jak był :) Zmiana cofnięta. commented 2025-10-25 17:34:03 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158 |
| 173760227 (Comments: 1) | lalluby6782 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wow, gran trabajo en un lugar donde es complicado de llegar para un mañero común y donde puede ser de mucha utilidad para la gente local. Impresionante la cantidad de muelles que existen allí. commented 2025-10-25 17:31:35 UTC by mweper ♦427 |
| 173451585 (Comments: 1) | Daniele_Granato97 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, antes que nada, gracias por añadir información a OSM! Vi que agregó varios nombres de calles en El Bañado. Para la próxima vez que añada nombres, le recomiendo consultar la política de OSM de ... commented 2025-10-25 17:30:32 UTC by SPalferro ♦15 |
| 173688867 (Comments: 2) | velomalopolska (Discussed changesets: 4) | najnowszy odcinek z asfaltem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785003510 commented 2025-10-25 17:29:45 UTC by Adam_Piszczek ♦178 |
| 160810556 (Comments: 2) | t_ja (Discussed changesets: 14) | Dik za upozornenie 👍 Tak dlho som cakal na novu Ofmozaiku, az som na toto zabudol 🙈 commented 2025-10-25 17:29:31 UTC by t_ja ♦217 |
| 173764774 (Comments: 1) | hne9MS7Q7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for adding more information. Please make sure to always type phone numbers using the international format (+32 2…) and not the local format (02…). ITU-T E.164 format is mandatory on OSM. We fixed your edit. commented 2025-10-25 17:15:50 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 173686714 (Comments: 2) | jbcharron (Discussed changesets: 23) | Je savais qu'il avait du mouvement mais les planned: ne sont pas visible dans STC J'ai supprimé mon noeud commented 2025-10-25 17:14:38 UTC by jbcharron ♦123 |
| 173762496 (Comments: 4) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/173763062/6829490 commented 2025-10-25 16:58:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 104058563 (Comments: 3) | superfafa74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | fait https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173764918 commented 2025-10-25 16:56:22 UTC by Vinber ♦811 |
| 173764006 (Comments: 4) | DeltaBurg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opmerking op de kaart geplaatst https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5022698#map=16/52.35404/5.01356&layers=N commented 2025-10-25 16:43:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173762428 (Comments: 1) | Miezpiez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-25 16:32:46 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173661221 (Comments: 2) | itsmeorestis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you very much for your comment! I will check out and fix the references you pointed out! commented 2025-10-25 16:26:53 UTC by itsmeorestis ♦1 |
| 173584690 (Comments: 1) | Malema99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. ¿Por qué se ha eliminado la etiqueta de museo? Un saludo. commented 2025-10-25 16:17:40 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦356 |
| 173678039 (Comments: 5) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 27) | In diesem Fall ist es OSM2World. commented 2025-10-25 16:16:22 UTC by vanagaudi ♦30 |
| 173269830 (Comments: 3) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 77) | תודה 👋 commented 2025-10-25 16:13:15 UTC by hatul ♦410 |
| 173762090 (Comments: 3) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Zo zou die goed moeten staan volgensmij. commented 2025-10-25 16:03:04 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12 |
| 159845419 (Comments: 1) | CécileBC (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, je viens d'annuler cette suppression car le bâtiment n'était pas en double, le musée est cartographié séparément du bâtiment. commented 2025-10-25 16:00:58 UTC by Syl ♦998 |
| 173737519 (Comments: 2) | kapazao_import (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi, it is explained in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Public_Transport https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:public_transport=platform https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=bus_stop https://wiki.o... commented 2025-10-25 15:57:52 UTC by kapazao ♦935 |
| 173761433 (Comments: 2) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 120) | Dziękuję, również pozdrawiam :) commented 2025-10-25 15:45:57 UTC by Adam Haba ♦27 |
| 173748537 (Comments: 1) | XXXXXXXXXXXF (Discussed changesets: 6) | Moin :) wo finde ich denn die Lizenzen zur Quelle? Kann auf der Seite nur ein (c) finden und das macht die Seite erstmal nicht für uns nutzbar. cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-10-25 15:44:43 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 173588654 (Comments: 1) | Adrian Slaby (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Adrian Slaby, du hast den neuen Kreisverkehr bei Stechow in einen Radweg umgewandelt und damit den Kfz-Verkehr ausgeschlossen. Das sieht mir unplausibel aus, zumal dieser meines Wissens bereits für den Verkehr freigegeben ist und ein Ge... commented 2025-10-25 15:28:23 UTC by bergaufsee ♦114 |
| 173760018 (Comments: 2) | Juan Chamorro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Basado en tus ediciones de mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he redactado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Ajustada la geometría de 4 nodos" (Auto-translation) --- Based on your map ed... commented 2025-10-25 15:06:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173684785 (Comments: 1) | Walter Łuszczyk (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zabawy w testowanie proszę uskuteczniać tu: https://opengeofiction.net/ a nie na realnej mapie! commented 2025-10-25 14:56:12 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173756499 (Comments: 1) | Walter Łuszczyk (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zabawy w testowanie proszę uskuteczniać tu: https://opengeofiction.net/ a nie na realnej mapie! commented 2025-10-25 14:55:46 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581 |
| 173729135 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM16 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Полигон здания нарисован поверх забора, здание удалено см https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173759349 commented 2025-10-25 14:46:43 UTC by dypa ♦144 |
| 173756128 (Comments: 4) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Lichtenvoorde wordt zeker nog wat, mist best veel groen op de map. Ondanks het een heel groen dorp is. Ga beetje bij beetje kijken of ik alles er netjes in kan zetten. commented 2025-10-25 14:25:46 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12 |
| 173704078 (Comments: 2) | Norbert Wołowiec (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thank you. I forgot to remove the tags that are imported from the BDOT10K database, and the JOSM validator ignores them. commented 2025-10-25 14:22:37 UTC by Norbert Wołowiec ♦2 |
| 173756796 (Comments: 2) | bemy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2878974498#map=19/52.224544/5.181666 commented 2025-10-25 14:20:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173700839 (Comments: 3) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Even if those claims you make were true, they are not a motive for removing items that actually exist on the ground. For the last time, I ask you to revert these deletions, including all the other changesets (11 changesets in total) made by yo... commented 2025-10-25 14:06:24 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22 |
| 172908614 (Comments: 1) | DreasNil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revertar borttagning av Bar Beckasin. Den ligger fortfarande där. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173757359 commented 2025-10-25 14:01:09 UTC by Nadja15 ♦16 |
| 173755183 (Comments: 4) | thpa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing commented 2025-10-25 13:46:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 165990723 (Comments: 1) | schilling5628 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo schilling5628, du hast dir viel Mühe beim Mappen des Einkaufszentrums gemacht. Die einzelnen Räume/Geschäfte sollten besser als einzelne Räume und nicht als eigenständige Gebäude (building=yes) eingezeichnet werden... commented 2025-10-25 13:36:18 UTC by schoka ♦52 |
| 173754301 (Comments: 1) | GATAA RANA (Discussed changesets: 3) | "GR:national_old" is not the correct network=* tag for an old provincial road relation. It should be "GR:provincial_old:16" instead. commented 2025-10-25 13:32:27 UTC by ika-chan! ♦296 |
| 71461905 (Comments: 1) | yoda75 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5019333 bzgl. der von dir gesetzten access-Werte in dieser Gegend commented 2025-10-25 13:22:04 UTC by Luzandro ♦946 |
| 173643891 (Comments: 3) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 24) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-25 13:19:05 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 165983097 (Comments: 1) | Franco83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buen día! Corresponde mantener las palabras sin abreviar en un nombre. Voy a ir corrigiendo. Saludos! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name commented 2025-10-25 13:09:51 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦126 |
| 172592171 (Comments: 5) | X_223- (Discussed changesets: 5) | 不是哥们，你要多长时间啊？三个月？三年？三百年？ commented 2025-10-25 13:04:43 UTC by Taksine ♦119 |
| 173746540 (Comments: 1) | ozjustbc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, we cant use Google Maps as a source for OpenStreetMap as it is prohibited by their terms of service. There's more information on the OSM wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google commented 2025-10-25 12:36:34 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645 |
| 173753734 (Comments: 1) | freeek123455676788644 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-25 12:27:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173753343 (Comments: 1) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Dag Jacob Ziet er wel netjes uit. Je zou evt de witruimte tussen de vlakken gras kunnen verwijderen door de vlakken samen te voegen. Het pad langs het water liep eerst kennelijk ook door die witruimte. Denk dat je die vlakken ook wel kan samen... commented 2025-10-25 12:25:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173610996 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 237) | Alas, "Remove duplicated section of highway" looks like it introduced a gap in the Chiltern Way. I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173753717 . Best Regards, Andy commented 2025-10-25 12:24:22 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦475 |
| 173578889 (Comments: 2) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 57) | Well, I do agree with you. I'm not a fan of proposed features getting mapped. As it stands right now, it is more or less up to each local community to decide whether they want proposed objects or not. If you've got anything specifica... commented 2025-10-25 12:22:12 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463 |
| 173583328 (Comments: 1) | NTTrailsMEE (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, This introduced a gap in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/23406 . I've filled it in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173753564 . Best Regards, Andy commented 2025-10-25 12:20:08 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦475 |
| 172845317 (Comments: 3) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 23) | That's a good spot, I'd not quite understood that the substreet and parentstreet replaced street. I'll avoid adding streets where they are present. commented 2025-10-25 12:10:14 UTC by philipcullen ♦13 |
| 168183268 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:56:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173749099 (Comments: 1) | Keyun2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij osm. Wat is bedoeling met deze toevoeging? Mvg eggie commented 2025-10-25 11:53:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 171785100 (Comments: 1) | johanbont (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, quelles sont vos sources pour procéder à des modifications dans OSM ? Plusieurs de vos liens contiennent vers des sites web contiennent des trackeur google maps. Les CGU de Google Maps contreviennent avec l'édition ... commented 2025-10-25 11:52:40 UTC by blm07 ♦5 |
| 173752339 (Comments: 1) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ik zie al wat ik hier beter kan doen commented 2025-10-25 11:52:22 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12 |
| 168292212 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:38:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 148060872 (Comments: 2) | Thibtib51 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Lyctkel, You're right and I change it. Thank you for your help :). Best Regards, Thibtib51 commented 2025-10-25 11:35:50 UTC by Thibtib51 ♦4 |
| 173499885 (Comments: 4) | Farsida (Discussed changesets: 9) | Я бы не назвал лесом несколько деревьев на территориях гостиниц. Но если вы считаете, что я ошибся, можете откатить мои изменения. commented 2025-10-25 11:35:13 UTC by Farsida ♦3 |
| 168560772 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:21:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 168560857 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:20:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173749215 (Comments: 1) | rigilk3nt (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Top Quelle :) Passt du die Eigenschaften noch vollständig an? Alles was nicht mehr ist entweder mit lebenszyklus (was:*=* oder destroyed:*=*) oder, wenn es nicht mehr gebraucht wird, weg. Cheers Silversurfer83 commented 2025-10-25 11:20:16 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 168561519 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:19:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 168649628 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:18:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 168652202 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:18:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 168680756 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:12:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 168683439 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-25 11:12:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 102343460 (Comments: 1) | slymarekivan (Discussed changesets: 35) | Zdravim, prosim nedavajte brany na chodnik, ktory len ide okolo brany/arealu a cez branu neprechadza. Vasim sposobom sme zablokovali aj chodnik (pre navigaciu). Branu dajte na spolocny bod plotu okolo arealu a cestu, ktora smeruje do arealu (a mus... commented 2025-10-25 11:04:13 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699 |
| 173650999 (Comments: 1) | ingo-pech (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Algbtq for more information. commented 2025-10-25 11:02:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173749207 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 890) | Den Link zur Diskussion hab ich extra hinzugefügt, aus dem hervorgeht, dass es da keinen "gängigen Tag" gibt. commented 2025-10-25 10:43:48 UTC by syncronic ♦34 |
| 173438666 (Comments: 3) | 001100N277 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2025-10-25 10:41:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173750102 (Comments: 1) | mohammed yassen (Discussed changesets: 1) | قبر الشهيدين السعيدين ياسين الجنابي وابنه مرتضى commented 2025-10-25 10:37:53 UTC by mohammed yassen ♦1 |
| 173724598 (Comments: 2) | Benji Gillman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the feedback and the welcome! Yes, I see I've used an incorrect tag. I'll check the wiki more from now on 👍 I'll remove that tag now. commented 2025-10-25 10:37:52 UTC by Benji Gillman ♦1 |
| 171535856 (Comments: 2) | 001100N277 (Discussed changesets: 4) | check, aangepast commented 2025-10-25 10:30:41 UTC by 001100N277 ♦2 |
| 173732022 (Comments: 2) | draconic_mapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, thanks for finding that. It means I should have taken a break from mapping earlier :P It was a mistake while entering name, I typed over the key instead of the value in the dialog ;) I have fixed it, along with the street next to it where the sam... commented 2025-10-25 10:21:10 UTC by draconic_mapper ♦6 |
| 173748976 (Comments: 2) | AndreKruger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Created nodes" commented 2025-10-25 10:16:57 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173327519 (Comments: 5) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 27) | @tux67: Das ist richtig. In diesem Fall jedoch beabsichtigt, um herauszufinden, welcher Tag zu der fehlerhaften Darstellung führt. Da der überflüssige Eintrag zu keinem Fehler führt, habe ich mir erlaubt, diesen Eintrag zu erstell... commented 2025-10-25 10:14:50 UTC by vanagaudi ♦30 |
| 135785175 (Comments: 1) | 541074 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Diese Änderung (und die darauffolgenden) versteh ich nicht. An den zwei Stellen sind doch gar keine Ampeln. commented 2025-10-25 10:14:20 UTC by kadiwa ♦44 |
| 15800492 (Comments: 6) | marco406 (Discussed changesets: 26) | skasowałem commented 2025-10-25 09:53:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173744915 (Comments: 1) | nmimn (Discussed changesets: 7) | Prosím proč jsi odstranil dětské brouzdaliště z areálu koupaliště v Sázavě? Ještě na podzim tam bylo, už je zbouráno? commented 2025-10-25 09:39:33 UTC by vrabcak ♦3 |
| 173747498 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.buckeyeaz.gov/government/city-clerk/mayor-and-council/see-a-map-of-district-boundaries commented 2025-10-25 09:34:50 UTC by ieguy3 ♦6 |
| 173700990 (Comments: 2) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | SHITCOINS.CLUB practices unlicensed activity, faces regulatory scrutiny across the EU, has no verified authorization in Romania, and is widely reported by users as unreliable or fraudulent, making its inclusion a reputational and legal risk commented 2025-10-25 09:32:01 UTC by Alex Topo ♦6 |
| 173700876 (Comments: 2) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | SHITCOINS.CLUB practices unlicensed activity, faces regulatory scrutiny across the EU, has no verified authorization in Romania, and is widely reported by users as unreliable or fraudulent, making its inclusion a reputational and legal risk commented 2025-10-25 09:31:59 UTC by Alex Topo ♦6 |
| 173700856 (Comments: 2) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | SHITCOINS.CLUB practices unlicensed activity, faces regulatory scrutiny across the EU, has no verified authorization in Romania, and is widely reported by users as unreliable or fraudulent, making its inclusion a reputational and legal risk commented 2025-10-25 09:31:56 UTC by Alex Topo ♦6 |
| 173700801 (Comments: 2) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | SHITCOINS.CLUB practices unlicensed activity, faces regulatory scrutiny across the EU, has no verified authorization in Romania, and is widely reported by users as unreliable or fraudulent, making its inclusion a reputational and legal risk. commented 2025-10-25 09:31:31 UTC by Alex Topo ♦6 |
| 173747249 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 102) | Jestem świadomy, że SKANSKA zapewnie zajmie przynajmniej część pozostałego brownfieldu z racji na brak zapowiedzi, że coś się tam innego w najbliższym czasie zacznie robić. Gdyby tak zaszło, proponuję po prostu zamienić landuse=brownfie... commented 2025-10-25 09:21:20 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267 |
| 126823563 (Comments: 4) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 169) | Btw, the cycle zone is the result of our work, using OSM to measure street widths: https://fietsersbond.be/brugge/nieuws/fietszone-lijkt-aangewezen-na-opmeting-van-de-brugse-binnenstad/ commented 2025-10-25 09:21:01 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦454 |
| 173676490 (Comments: 1) | Simon Hedvig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pridávať obchody ako body je správny postup. Ale ak adresa je už na budove netreba ju dávať duplicitne aj do bodu, aplikácie si ju prevezmú z budovy. Tiež je dobré pridávať obchodom otv&aacu... commented 2025-10-25 09:06:36 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248 |
| 173746263 (Comments: 1) | Dwain Zwerg (Discussed changesets: 8) | Nochmal als Nicht Short-URL https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/faehren-zum-dockland-fallen-bis-ende-november-aus,kurzehh-1310.html commented 2025-10-25 09:04:22 UTC by Dwain Zwerg ♦5 |
| 173746237 (Comments: 1) | bjnk954 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-10-25 09:00:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173672584 (Comments: 1) | SamuelBuchlak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je dobré pridávať obchodom otváracie hodiny. commented 2025-10-25 09:00:34 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248 |
| 173671975 (Comments: 1) | Igor_6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je dobré pridávať aj otváracie hodiny. commented 2025-10-25 08:57:42 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248 |
| 173671760 (Comments: 1) | PeterHrcka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je dobré pridávať aj otváracie hodiny. commented 2025-10-25 08:55:56 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248 |
| 173646364 (Comments: 4) | kasmar00 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thanks, that make sense and that must have been what I wanted to do. commented 2025-10-25 08:46:46 UTC by kasmar00 ♦63 |
| 157788834 (Comments: 1) | nilogian (Discussed changesets: 8) | Tutte le tue modifiche vicino a OBI sono sbagliate o disegnate male, le sto correggendo. commented 2025-10-25 08:45:57 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110 |
| 173671542 (Comments: 1) | janirek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Značka shop=yes nestačí, treba vybrať konkrétne aký je to obchod https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:shop Na obchody je lepšie pridať len bod a nie použiť celý rodinný dom. Tiež tam ch&ya... commented 2025-10-25 08:38:25 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248 |
| 164256130 (Comments: 1) | Chenshi (Discussed changesets: 33) | Moin! Du hast hier den Pipeline-Marker https://www.osm.org/node/12609176826 mit der Leitung verbunden. Das habe ich rückgängig gemacht : https://www.osm.org/changeset/173744002 Falls es Absicht war: Der Marker (ein gelber Pfosten)... commented 2025-10-25 08:38:20 UTC by GerdP ♦2,780 |
| 173741026 (Comments: 2) | Michał Paluchowski (Discussed changesets: 14) | Curtis Plaza dawno już zniknęła. Stoją dwa żurawie i budowa nowych budynków ruszyła. commented 2025-10-25 08:35:41 UTC by Michał Paluchowski ♦15 |
| 173667781 (Comments: 1) | Bohusmarian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pri pridávaní boxov si pozrite existujúce aké majú značky a pozrite si aj návod https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parcel_locker Pomenovať bod názvom nestačí, apliká... commented 2025-10-25 08:35:19 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248 |
| 173739564 (Comments: 1) | SweetGIS (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, and welcome to OSM! May I ask where the name “New-Yorker-Landstraße” comes from? I wasn’t able to find anything similar in the Geoportal of the state of Hesse. Thanks and best regards, Pascal ---... commented 2025-10-25 08:28:49 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173733809 (Comments: 1) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 127) | Le relazioni di percorsi a catasto nazionale non possono avere diramazioni. Qui hai sdoppiato la relazione su un incrocio. 716B commented 2025-10-25 08:21:25 UTC by Jrachi ♦798 |
| 173684167 (Comments: 1) | Arman Bin Alauddin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1444303136. What is the mean of the tag Ablution Space = yes? Did you see the other mosque https://www.osm.org/way/375513922. Which of this buildings exists? commented 2025-10-25 08:21:04 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173729491 (Comments: 1) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 127) | Ciao. Ti prego di non modificare le relazioni di percorsi escursionistici del catasto nazionale. Li riconosci per la presenza del tag ref:REI Se ti trovi ad inserire rotonde o comunque a modificare way dove passa una relazione hiking, ti pre... commented 2025-10-25 08:15:45 UTC by Jrachi ♦798 |
| 173713897 (Comments: 1) | ross-map (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1444497600. What is the mean of the tags AR_VMS_TY=05 CLASSREF=2e7fc599-5abd-49d8-a51e-1f8f4ebd2a74 COMUNE_IST=17076028 NOME_COM=CHIAROMONTE NOME_PROV=POTENZA PROVIN_IST=076 TI... commented 2025-10-25 08:14:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 141134128 (Comments: 3) | Andre Engels (Discussed changesets: 55) | Kijk anders even hier nog een keer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath Het is al weer een tijd geleden. Wellicht doe je het nu wel goed? MVG eggie commented 2025-10-25 08:11:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173720879 (Comments: 1) | Zenfiric (Discussed changesets: 118) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1444526706 . what is the mean of the tag 3 = 6778728? commented 2025-10-25 08:10:10 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173568358 (Comments: 1) | Kaisik (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1443597214. What is the mean of the tags 11=16? commented 2025-10-25 08:07:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173728353 (Comments: 1) | NachoGtz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please be careful! You moved the four nodes more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I must reverted your chnge set. Please take a new try to add ALPR withwout destroying the existing streets. commented 2025-10-25 07:55:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173575519 (Comments: 7) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 61) | You are right. I was under the wrong impression that the west side `=primary` was a different road from Kam Tin Road. Then, indeed, there is no symmetry, and this `=primary` should still be `=secondary` instead. commented 2025-10-25 07:49:09 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦56 |
| 173704427 (Comments: 2) | Andy Lock (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, you're right. I'll update this tomorrow. Thanks for the suggestion and guidance. commented 2025-10-25 07:48:49 UTC by Andy Lock ♦2 |
| 173729540 (Comments: 1) | natergibson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice a name isn't a address! Did you see https://www.osm.org/way/419909888? Please move a address to the main building, not to the street crossing. commented 2025-10-25 07:48:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173658890 (Comments: 4) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 237) | Hi Jan, I've now looked at the whole junction layout and there are anomalies, I'll try to explain the logic I assume. The 4 sections of ref N44, (Way: Leidsestraatweg (7471615), Way: Rijksstraatweg (1216487071), Way: Leidsestraatw... commented 2025-10-25 07:36:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948 |
| 173733870 (Comments: 1) | DZehavi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thanks for your modification. Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/18068055, https://www.osm.org/way/35415556. There are still road overlaps here that cannot be resolved without local knowledge. commented 2025-10-25 07:36:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173733789 (Comments: 2) | Swell Air Conditioning (Discussed changesets: 2) | PLUS also please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes ! The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted. Source: ... commented 2025-10-25 07:27:37 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 173734163 (Comments: 1) | Swell Air Conditioning (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2025-10-25 07:26:14 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 172424950 (Comments: 1) | Karmicatosaurus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Les voies privées ne sont pas supprimer dans osm, pour indiquer le fait qu'elle soit privé, il faut utiliser le tag access=private Bonne journée commented 2025-10-25 07:09:26 UTC by jbcharron ♦123 |
| 173739666 (Comments: 1) | JustinJBrown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! Please move the node to the main building. Could please add also the key religion, denormination, service_times? commented 2025-10-25 07:08:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173740425 (Comments: 1) | ydounot90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11552533563 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! commented 2025-10-25 06:54:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 158478356 (Comments: 2) | Krithikrb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok commented 2025-10-25 06:44:44 UTC by Krithikrb ♦1 |
| 173640113 (Comments: 2) | en-wai06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Will make sure of that next time. Thanks for the feedback. commented 2025-10-25 06:42:10 UTC by en-wai06 ♦1 |
| 173416332 (Comments: 1) | Hung159 (Discussed changesets: 9) | tại sao bạn xoá tag oneway=yes trên đường thuỵ khuê? đường này cấm ô tô vào từ lạc long quân nên tag oneway này đúng, và có các tag onewa... commented 2025-10-25 06:31:24 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦14 |
| 173739272 (Comments: 1) | cheatach (Discussed changesets: 26) | Ale głupota... Trzeba jakoś załatać dziurę w budżecie commented 2025-10-25 06:17:47 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761 |
| 172793917 (Comments: 1) | Wouter Huygens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows the name to be Natuurdomein Spildoorn Vijver? I can't find it. Thank you. commented 2025-10-25 05:38:15 UTC by VLD549 ♦307 |
| 173695954 (Comments: 1) | lbellomo (Discussed changesets: 4) | How do you differ from grass and grassland? commented 2025-10-25 05:37:41 UTC by PcMouse1 ♦69 |
| 173732141 (Comments: 1) | Alp Utku (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merhaba. Değiştirdiğiniz yol sınıflarının doğru olduğuna emin misiniz? Bölgeyi bilmiyorum fakat uydu görüntülerinden anlaşıldığı kadarıyla Bağdat Caddesi'ne paralel yol ile Adalı Sokağı'nın yol sını... commented 2025-10-25 05:23:21 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145 |
| X | 173738140 (Comments: 2) | princemateenroyal122 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173741900 where the changeset comment is: Remove spam commented 2025-10-25 05:21:48 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173741120 (Comments: 1) | Lewis Munaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please take care not to connect the building nodes to the SRL commented 2025-10-25 04:25:14 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64 |
| 173710117 (Comments: 1) | pjodhka90 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please take care not to connect the building nodes to the SRL commented 2025-10-25 04:25:05 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64 |
| 173741082 (Comments: 1) | AkuAnakTimur (Discussed changesets: 177) | Ground truth from May 2023 commented 2025-10-25 04:05:30 UTC by AkuAnakTimur ♦458 |
| 143727209 (Comments: 1) | Lockstar (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hi, do you know for sure that there are bridges at way/1221714115? From what I can tell from GPS traces, the path does not actually cross the stream here (though I have not surveyed it) commented 2025-10-25 03:30:57 UTC by radiotrefoil ♦115 |
| 173579170 (Comments: 1) | Chris Stanford (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good go at trying to map the large building here, but always ensure that your edits agree with the latest imagery. Check the bottom right to see what imagery you're looking at when editing. You can see how I mapped it in Changeset: 173740593 I ... commented 2025-10-25 03:26:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056 |
| 172216922 (Comments: 1) | wolfy1339 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Même si le projet d'interchange est en pause, l'imagerie aérienne détaillée du MERN montre que la station d'interconnexion (chemin 1219412604) est pratiquement complétée. Il est important &agr... commented 2025-10-25 01:58:05 UTC by PierZen ♦272 |
| 173130752 (Comments: 7) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 9) | >あなたにとって不要な情報でも、他の方には必要な情報はたくさんあります。 そうですね。 他の方が追加なさることは認めます。申し訳ありませんが、私の編集による、編集時点... commented 2025-10-25 01:56:47 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦28 |
| 172082027 (Comments: 1) | marxymarx (Discussed changesets: 2) | старые названия уже имеются в теге old_name=* commented 2025-10-25 01:27:39 UTC by slavan118 ♦3 |
| 173659839 (Comments: 1) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 458) | Jeśli chcesz zwrócić uwagę na błąd na mapie, lepszym rozwiązaniem od note są uwagi. commented 2025-10-25 01:24:20 UTC by olo81 ♦688 |
| 173584672 (Comments: 1) | Malema99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página par... commented 2025-10-25 01:22:59 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦356 |
| 173506793 (Comments: 1) | marxymarx (Discussed changesets: 2) | Не надо удалять точки с описанием станций/остановочных пунктов. И тем более переносить теги на полигон! commented 2025-10-25 01:22:58 UTC by slavan118 ♦3 |
| 173739077 (Comments: 2) | thd10045 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed toilet facility" commented 2025-10-25 00:46:28 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173686299 (Comments: 1) | pnwcascades (Discussed changesets: 5) | We don't use descriptive names, like closed landfill. Instead tag it as landuse=landfill + disued=yes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dlandfill --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-10-25 00:06:59 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173585975 (Comments: 1) | soloeye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don’t adjust road types based on navigation system behavior. Classifications should reflect real-world conditions, not routing outcomes. commented 2025-10-25 00:04:39 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124 |
| 171244770 (Comments: 1) | AstroSinclaire (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting changes so that it matches actual condition on roads. There are cycle paths/lanes here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173738686 commented 2025-10-24 23:57:24 UTC by Tim Niblett ♦4 |
| 173738163 (Comments: 2) | Piotr Strębski (Discussed changesets: 187) | Poprawione! commented 2025-10-24 23:56:16 UTC by Piotr Strębski ♦185 |
| 173737316 (Comments: 1) | David L Hill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oops, didn't mean to botch that! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173737316 commented 2025-10-24 23:54:04 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 172773459 (Comments: 1) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 5) | Just wanted to comment: I reverted N Empire Rd and Bard Creek Rd Back to tertiary since both the county and my Public Works contact at the town of Empire classify these two main roads as arterial roads for the area, as they connect Bard Creek Valley/... commented 2025-10-24 23:41:48 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦5 |
| 173737923 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 76) | Thankfully, the changeset bounding box turned out to be tiny, but editing programs can be a bit of a troll at times. commented 2025-10-24 23:17:59 UTC by ika-chan! ♦296 |
| 173648018 (Comments: 1) | Eunir Augusto (Discussed changesets: 1) | o Bretas Em Minas Gerais Foi Vendido Para O Supermercados BH. A rede Supermercados BH comprou todas as operações do Bretas em Minas Gerais do grupo chileno Cencosud em fevereiro de 2025, por R$ 716 milhões commented 2025-10-24 23:10:43 UTC by ricaestevao ♦3 |
| 173701012 (Comments: 1) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Why have you removed these points? This looks like vandalism. Please revert. commented 2025-10-24 22:31:59 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22 |
| 173669052 (Comments: 2) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 120) | Dobrze, zmienię następnym razem opis commented 2025-10-24 22:16:32 UTC by Adam Haba ♦27 |
| 173620869 (Comments: 1) | MAG_OSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number. For freecall numbe... commented 2025-10-24 22:09:01 UTC by tastrax ♦1,171 |
| 173736183 (Comments: 1) | Fgjgdrou (Discussed changesets: 11) | *restricted byways commented 2025-10-24 22:08:10 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13 |
| 173736406 (Comments: 1) | Fgjgdrou (Discussed changesets: 11) | *restricted byways commented 2025-10-24 22:07:54 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13 |
| 173736440 (Comments: 1) | Fgjgdrou (Discussed changesets: 11) | *restricted byways commented 2025-10-24 22:07:42 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13 |
| 173736524 (Comments: 1) | Fgjgdrou (Discussed changesets: 11) | *restricted byways commented 2025-10-24 22:07:33 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13 |
| 173736553 (Comments: 1) | Fgjgdrou (Discussed changesets: 11) | *restricted byways commented 2025-10-24 22:07:23 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13 |
| 173700230 (Comments: 1) | jimmyjamjar10101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hot tip - in ID editor - Q on the keyboard will square the corners of buildings etc and O will make something circular commented 2025-10-24 21:58:42 UTC by tastrax ♦1,171 |
| 173736389 (Comments: 1) | KhalidKashmiri (Discussed changesets: 10) | Plan SOR na https://zielonyursus.pl/ursus-podsumowanie-inwestycji-lipiec-2025/ jest chyba aktualny, ale w kiepskiej jakości i bez oznakowania commented 2025-10-24 21:57:35 UTC by KhalidKashmiri ♦9 |
| 173731372 (Comments: 1) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 25) | Przystanek tramwajowy to nie jest highway=platform tylko railway=platform i na Wzgórzach przy tych peronach nie będzie autobusów. Podczas edycji skasowałeś dodane punkty zatrzymania oraz relacje, a następnie dodałeś miejsce zat... commented 2025-10-24 21:57:02 UTC by Bartek444 ♦24 |
 | 149039031 (Comments: 1) | AE35 (Discussed changesets: 58) | Synes det ser ud til, at du bruger 'lanes=2' på veje uden markerede kørebaner (fx Galpestykket (4333600)) Selvom der er færdsel i begge retninger, skal man så egentlig ikke bruge 'lane_markings=no' ? commented 2025-10-24 21:56:19 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦108 |
| 138885679 (Comments: 1) | starfury7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | ist da echt ein Bildstock? sh. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4697355 commented 2025-10-24 21:47:35 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394 |
| 173630062 (Comments: 2) | Jannik E (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, mein Fehler. Du scheinst nach mehr recherche recht zu haben. commented 2025-10-24 21:30:37 UTC by Jannik E ♦2 |
| 172336457 (Comments: 2) | Razieru (Discussed changesets: 3) | Спасибо. А я обычно не прописываю теги вручную, а просто заполняю через iD предложенные поля. Тогда сейчас пробегусь по всем зебрам что уж... commented 2025-10-24 21:29:50 UTC by Razieru ♦2 |
| 172080886 (Comments: 3) | Rawmance (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hyvä tietää, ja kiitokset oleellisista karttamuutoksista. commented 2025-10-24 21:23:43 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦69 |
| 173656787 (Comments: 2) | BakedCake02 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Noted. I'm going to delete the relation, I just thought they needed a relation because they share the same building. commented 2025-10-24 21:11:10 UTC by BakedCake02 ♦1 |
| 173638034 (Comments: 3) | highpotential (Discussed changesets: 16) | erledigt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173735179 commented 2025-10-24 21:06:13 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦835 |
| 171876941 (Comments: 1) | oudalricus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, hatte den Weg zwischenzeitlich auf "path" geändert, weil kein Verkehrzeichen vorhanden ist. Sehe mich im Wiki-Eintrag zu highway=footway eigentlich bestätigt. commented 2025-10-24 21:02:59 UTC by p1230 ♦14 |
| 102745609 (Comments: 1) | hannahrm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Hanna. Fedback on way 881221713. I would not tag it with bicycle=yes. Unless I have overlooked something, on the ground there is no sign indicating bicycle use. If it is used habitually by cyclists despite this, you could tag it with bicycle=pe... commented 2025-10-24 20:59:05 UTC by voschix ♦187 |
| 173728929 (Comments: 4) | Emble agency (Discussed changesets: 1) | We zetten in geval van meerdere bedrijven die hetzelfde adres delen gewoon nog een adresnode. Stork had ik verwijderd. Ik heb even een identiek adresnode bijgemaakt. Die kun je evt een aantal keren kopiëren en van bedrijfsinfo voorzie... commented 2025-10-24 20:54:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173725276 (Comments: 1) | sheillahnayiga (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, could you fix all the issues you have created ? (red nodes here : https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.55244&lat=3.85195&zoom=13&baselayer=OSM%20Carto%20(OSMF)&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle... commented 2025-10-24 20:48:37 UTC by Yunan973 ♦79 |
| 170997641 (Comments: 5) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 13) | du hattest sie auf disused:type gesetzt. Das sollte doch reichen um sie von der neuen VRM180 zu unterscheiden. commented 2025-10-24 20:32:15 UTC by bernward1 ♦19 |
| 107401059 (Comments: 7) | Marcello Perathoner (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ah, schon gefunden, dort steht Sosseneck. commented 2025-10-24 20:23:53 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394 |
| 163836445 (Comments: 2) | ion_chi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please delete it. It was probably a heatmap artifact commented 2025-10-24 20:18:48 UTC by ion_chi ♦35 |
| 161257412 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 426) | Mógłbyś popatrzeć w okolicę https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8835785960 bo tam zupełnie to co narysowałeś nie odpowiada tym co widać na ortofoto.. commented 2025-10-24 20:10:23 UTC by IreuN ♦74 |
| 173733708 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 29) | sorry for the big changeset commented 2025-10-24 20:09:07 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110 |
| 143935242 (Comments: 3) | goaned (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi goaned, danke für die schnelle Antwort und Bearbeitung. Schönes Wochenende, lyctkel commented 2025-10-24 20:00:39 UTC by lyctkel ♦346 |
| 173648616 (Comments: 7) | resitive (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi.. Weg is inderdaad weg, maar op de luchtfoto zijn ze nog te herkennen... Je zou dan railway=razed kunnen gebruiken. Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed Het is geen ra... commented 2025-10-24 20:00:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173728306 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hej, dzięki. Nie zauważyłem przy zmianie nazwy ulicy. commented 2025-10-24 19:53:39 UTC by marazzer ♦47 |
| 173329483 (Comments: 6) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 36) | On est bien d'accord. J'avais vu passer cette page des records (qui ne précise pas la précision supposée), moi c'est une bàl du coin (celle des 5 chemins à Guidel) "au numéro près&q... commented 2025-10-24 19:33:08 UTC by trial ♦957 |
| 173648077 (Comments: 2) | resitive (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ha eggie, bedankt voor de oplettenheid commented 2025-10-24 19:31:57 UTC by resitive ♦3 |
| 173730988 (Comments: 1) | zeelsag (Discussed changesets: 2) | Beste , name= niet gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Ook niet in het Engels. Ik heb name= ... verwijderd MVG eggie commented 2025-10-24 19:11:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173725095 (Comments: 2) | zeelsag (Discussed changesets: 2) | Naam en duplicated tagging verwijderd commented 2025-10-24 19:10:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 165483169 (Comments: 3) | gtfs2osm-il (Discussed changesets: 7) | שכחתי לומר, מספיק אחד מהשניים: highway=bus_stop או public_transport=platform bus=yes אבל כאמור, הם לא היו. הבלבול הוא נפוץ כי בעברית אומרים "תח... commented 2025-10-24 19:07:42 UTC by NeatNit ♦39 |
| 170752647 (Comments: 3) | kitsee (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi there Gary, It doesn't appear to be widespread, affecting only affecting a couple of areas in this grid. honestly no idea why this happen. I've now delete them. Thanks for point this out. commented 2025-10-24 19:01:24 UTC by kitsee ♦105 |
| 173296247 (Comments: 5) | PWSpaces (Discussed changesets: 1) | Let me check into that and see if I can get some solid advice for you. Would you mind messaging me on OpenStreetMap (not in this changeset, as it's public) with your email address so I can follow up with you there? commented 2025-10-24 18:58:32 UTC by MapAwayThePain ♦12 |
| 173718117 (Comments: 1) | 2137xd (Discussed changesets: 22) | I tak pewnie niedługo cała reszta DK7 zostanie zmieniona na trunk: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pl:Tag:highway=trunk#G%C5%82osowanie_-_2._tura commented 2025-10-24 18:57:08 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦295 |
| 173645787 (Comments: 2) | jumbanho (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-24 18:55:34 UTC by jumbanho ♦149 |
| 173192707 (Comments: 1) | rayan54 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonsoir, Merci pour vos contributions Pour information, sur un rond point on doit ajout le tag junction roundabout pour indiquer explicitement que c'est un rond-point, je viens de corriger Bonne soirée Jean-Baptiste commented 2025-10-24 18:55:20 UTC by jbcharron ♦123 |
| 54565007 (Comments: 1) | ph71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is there any unit? Some number of door? commented 2025-10-24 18:46:04 UTC by AF HAF KARTOGRAF ♦64 |
| 173622541 (Comments: 1) | mlange_nbg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Review siehe PN commented 2025-10-24 18:41:25 UTC by pyram ♦512 |
| X | 173691990 (Comments: 2) | lbellomo (Discussed changesets: 4) | horrible change, shame on you commented 2025-10-24 18:31:21 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| 155233980 (Comments: 1) | Chemnitzer13 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Chemnitzer13, Do you recall from where you got these uic_ref codes? They don't match with the official source - National Railway Infrastructure Company (НКЖИ). For example Добрич Север is listed as 5229711 but you... commented 2025-10-24 18:10:45 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦727 |
 | 173504926 (Comments: 1) | pal22 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Om du skal redigere landcover så må du setter deg inn i korleis relasjonar og multipolys virkar. commented 2025-10-24 18:07:21 UTC by Gazer75 ♦290 |
| 173728288 (Comments: 1) | osm_sense (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wir taggen/kartieren nur Sichtbares, nicht das, was erst in 50/100 Jahren geplant ist. Über unser/mein Tagging hier, wie das korrekt oder verbessert/korrigiert werden soll, darf und soll diskutiert werden - aber wir taggen/kartieren nur S... commented 2025-10-24 18:01:31 UTC by osm_sense ♦1 |
| 168874039 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:56:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 168902959 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:55:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173727618 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nbr 85 was already correctly mapped, this is next door. Please respect our work and do not add duplicate addresses. commented 2025-10-24 17:55:12 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 173679363 (Comments: 1) | Matty Smart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Matty, There wasn't a level 10 boundary for Redcar because there is no Redcar town/parish council. What source did you use to establish that this is the boundary of "Redcar"? Also, it is "traditional" to re-use bound... commented 2025-10-24 17:53:44 UTC by Colin Smale ♦323 |
| 169901106 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:53:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 169904904 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:53:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 169905752 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:51:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 169919803 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:51:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170006242 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:48:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170118634 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:46:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170120699 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:45:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173727779 (Comments: 1) | Sim100v (Discussed changesets: 11) | place=isolated_dwelling. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling Ici, en pleine ville ?? Vos ajouts dans OpenStreetMap ne sont pas sérieux, nous n’arrêtons pas de devoir corriger vos erreur... commented 2025-10-24 17:44:40 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 171838201 (Comments: 2) | bhmaps (Discussed changesets: 4) | Stimmt, danke für den Hinweis. Ist socket:type2. Habs korrigiert. Werde demnächst mal alle meine Änderungen durchschauen.. commented 2025-10-24 17:40:28 UTC by bhmaps ♦3 |
| 170169321 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:38:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170491522 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:35:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170513356 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:34:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170524825 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:33:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170538923 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:32:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173706945 (Comments: 3) | Dillen GJ (Discussed changesets: 62) | Ik sluit tevens de note nu van de anonieme tipgever commented 2025-10-24 17:32:29 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦42 |
| 173681285 (Comments: 5) | martin hamel (Discussed changesets: 8) | cool merci! commented 2025-10-24 17:31:54 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦432 |
| 170539718 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:27:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170581446 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:27:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 171368723 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:24:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 171370797 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:23:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 159631946 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 418) | Cześć WieKo68, z jakiego źródła są te granice parafii? Na ile są precyzyjne? Zrobiłem małą edycję w Luboniu i na krótkim odcinku scaliłem granicę parafii z administracyjną: https://www.osm.org/way/1443932297 Teraz... commented 2025-10-24 17:22:18 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦402 |
| 171371199 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:18:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 171968782 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:18:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 171970544 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:16:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 171971947 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:15:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172021237 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:15:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172022825 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:10:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173517357 (Comments: 1) | Starboy Infinity (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Starboy Infinity! Thank you for your contribution to the OSM. Could you please provide the source for this mapped complex? It doesn't look real. It was mapped some years ago, but wasn’t constructed yet, as I see on the lates... commented 2025-10-24 17:09:35 UTC by ZhannaB ♦10 |
| 172069496 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:08:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172126875 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:07:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172298020 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:04:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173715533 (Comments: 1) | jaqba (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-24 17:03:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173727350 (Comments: 1) | Ras1985 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-24 17:03:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173724472 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 617) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13254461826 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-24 17:03:42 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 172309818 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:03:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172354343 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:02:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172355332 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:02:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172577768 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:59:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172617701 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:58:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172625921 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:57:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172626992 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:57:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173723280 (Comments: 1) | Imkerei Frerichs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Placing a POI on the driveway is not allowed. That's why I've adjusted things to comply with the rules on OSM. commented 2025-10-24 16:56:49 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 172664128 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:56:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172666823 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:56:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172751424 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:55:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173724520 (Comments: 1) | Discount House Furniture (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/162153490 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-10-24 16:54:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173701184 (Comments: 1) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Why have you removed these points? This looks like vandalism. Please revert. commented 2025-10-24 16:41:57 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22 |
| 173701129 (Comments: 1) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Why have you removed these points? This looks like vandalism. Please revert. commented 2025-10-24 16:41:18 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22 |
| 164367333 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 890) | This tag was intentionally added, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Angers/Arbres_signaux. commented 2025-10-24 16:40:18 UTC by Ltrlg ♦79 |
| 172761102 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:38:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 170306411 (Comments: 4) | ÖTK (Discussed changesets: 43) | Merci! Benutzer ÖTK ist leider schon fast 2 Monate nicht mehr auf OSM aktiv gewesen. commented 2025-10-24 16:37:02 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394 |
| 173701288 (Comments: 1) | Alex Topo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Why have you removed these points? commented 2025-10-24 16:35:56 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22 |
| 173700405 (Comments: 1) | Mondeval2455 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Il commento al changeset non è modificabile e l'ho riportato errato, correzione: Modifiche non discusse con la comunità nel campo "name". Le condizioni dai revert precedenti non risultano soddisfatte affinché... commented 2025-10-24 16:33:58 UTC by Mondeval2455 ♦1 |
| 155011721 (Comments: 4) | maximiliansr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hab mir das angeschaut. Da steht ein Poller am Wegrand, aber der versperrt nichts. Ausserdem steht da ein Schild, dass es eine Sackgasse für mehrspurige Fahrzeuge ist. Wäre ja sinnlos, wenn man da gar nicht reinfahren könnte. Ich werde... commented 2025-10-24 16:18:39 UTC by GerdP ♦2,780 |
| 172801420 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:13:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172620500 (Comments: 2) | Przemysław69 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Cześć, Rzeczywiście, wkradły mi się jakieś nieplanowane zmiany ;P. Poprawione! Dzięki za czujność. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-10-24 16:12:45 UTC by Przemysław69 ♦1 |
| 164649036 (Comments: 6) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | Jestem w trakcie wycofania wszystkich zniszczeń i prawdopodobnych zniszczeń wykonanych przez tą osobę commented 2025-10-24 16:10:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 172920157 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:09:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173723427 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:08:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173723943 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 16:06:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173687202 (Comments: 3) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 197) | https://buenosaires.gob.ar/noticias/continuidad-de-la-calle-besares-para-mejorar-la-conexion-en-saavedra commented 2025-10-24 16:02:44 UTC by i2004 ♦166 |
| 125951444 (Comments: 4) | Vonter (Discussed changesets: 28) | If there is absolutely no physical trace of a drain in the area, then deleting it would be the right way to go. I believe in this case it is more likely that there is a minor seasonal drain, but it may not be easily evident from aerial imagery. I... commented 2025-10-24 16:00:11 UTC by Vonter ♦76 |
| 173720891 (Comments: 1) | Cricri93160 (Discussed changesets: 12) | ## REVERTED This is not a one-way street. Vehicles coming from G. Thys may legally turn right into it, and cyclists+buses use it in both directions. Sorry, but we’ll have to undo your unsourced changeset. commented 2025-10-24 15:59:39 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602 |
| 173717443 (Comments: 5) | foreigner037 (Discussed changesets: 31) | То направо трябва диплома да може да се оправи човек с всичките начини на тагване. commented 2025-10-24 15:46:59 UTC by foreigner037 ♦66 |
| 173703527 (Comments: 5) | redrace (Discussed changesets: 60) | Huhu Hab ich schon gelesen. Ich muss da im Frühjahr mal mit dem Rennrad hin! commented 2025-10-24 15:42:46 UTC by redrace ♦163 |
| 173712994 (Comments: 5) | foreigner037 (Discussed changesets: 31) | @foreigner037 пак е скандализирал и разгорещил атмосферата :P:D (hug) Наистина, пусни една тема във форума. commented 2025-10-24 15:34:45 UTC by Fraxi ♦169 |
| 172922259 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 15:32:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173013282 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 15:31:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173722835 (Comments: 2) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Verder is het wel een gebruikersvriendelijke kaart haha commented 2025-10-24 15:31:05 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12 |
| 173098038 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 15:30:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173722862 (Comments: 2) | Hardenzielig (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb het aangepast als voorbeeld. commented 2025-10-24 15:26:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
 | 173691719 (Comments: 1) | lbellomo (Discussed changesets: 4) | By the way, landuse=grass is valid: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035611919 commented 2025-10-24 15:23:08 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦232 |
| 173711369 (Comments: 1) | jano1982 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Здравствуйте! Вы запросили посмотреть ваши правки. А можете рассказать почему вы решили поменять тип дороги и удалили несколько точ... commented 2025-10-24 15:18:13 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦200 |
| 173722305 (Comments: 3) | Hardenzielig (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hier een voorbeeld van een paardenbak. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.772876/4.682523 commented 2025-10-24 15:16:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173239639 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 15:12:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 173722266 (Comments: 2) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Top! Zal is kijken de komende dagen of ik meer kleine dingen kan aanpassen. Heel veel dank voor de tips! commented 2025-10-24 15:11:46 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12 |
| 173542098 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 15:11:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302 |
| 31627439 (Comments: 1) | demetrio_m (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ciao. Solitamente ele si usa per indicare l'altitudine espresso in metri. Tu hai scritto: 5600 (1707) E soprattutto: hai inserito come fonte Bing che non ha dati di elevazione! Ivo commented 2025-10-24 14:52:26 UTC by Jrachi ♦798 |
| 173719658 (Comments: 9) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ga gerust je gang. Niet te veel in één keer. Dan ben je ook geen goede toevoegingen kwijt bij een revert door een validator. Veel plezier met mappen. Bij twijfel kun je een hokje aanvinken met het verzoek of een ervaren m... commented 2025-10-24 14:46:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173718637 (Comments: 1) | SamNuttall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Sam oneway=no is default op wegen. Svp niet toevoegen aan alle wegen in Nederland. :) lanes=2 is niet van toepassing in die woonstraten. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-24 14:42:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173313161 (Comments: 2) | JenkoL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Another issue Images are taken under a certain degree so you see both the roof and a siding. A gable roof has a bend at its highest point. Map this roof as a single rectangular object because, when viewed from directly above, the roof is re... commented 2025-10-24 14:28:05 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| 173715772 (Comments: 4) | JacobPrinsen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Jacob.. leisure=park is een functie en niet de landuse (Dus wat je ziet) Je zult dus over water, bos gras e.d een extra vlak moeten leggen met leisure=park name=......... Niet de landuse omtaggen naar een functie. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-24 14:10:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 161831102 (Comments: 1) | Ecilas (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, cela ne va pas ce que tu as fait sur le bâtiment Crystal, il faut utiliser des building:part pour chacun des étages. C'est un peu compliqué alors je me propose de corriger. Peux-tu me dire à quels &eacut... commented 2025-10-24 14:05:54 UTC by Yunan973 ♦79 |
| 173659214 (Comments: 1) | HugoC01 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Très bon jardinage, merci ! commented 2025-10-24 13:51:13 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦158 |
| 173671812 (Comments: 1) | Marten K (Discussed changesets: 3) | Der Vollständigkeit halber (nicht von mir): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173715534 commented 2025-10-24 13:49:46 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 173673163 (Comments: 3) | Marten K (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi :) Thema Wald: Es ist prinzipiell nicht verboten einzelne Bäume zu erfassen. Für eine Ansammlung vieler Bäume, die einen Wald bilden haben wir bei OSM jedoch die oben verlinkten Möglichkeiten Wälder zu erfass... commented 2025-10-24 13:47:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 173718655 (Comments: 1) | draconic_mapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Forgot to add TIGER as a source. I used it for street names. commented 2025-10-24 13:38:56 UTC by draconic_mapper ♦6 |
| 173718644 (Comments: 1) | borovac (Discussed changesets: 60) | Fixing broken boundaries #MSFTOpenMaps I accidentally left the wrong comment. commented 2025-10-24 13:37:48 UTC by borovac ♦106 |
| 137914479 (Comments: 1) | jslawin2 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Mam nadzieję, że nie popełniasz już takich błędów z mapowaniem ogrodzeń. Większą pożyteczność ma oznaczenie bram, niż dawanie barrier=fence dla niedokładnie oznaczonych obszarów, do tego bez oznaczonych wejść. commented 2025-10-24 13:36:52 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267 |
| 173673841 (Comments: 5) | Marten K (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Marten, Thema Nutzbare Quellen: - Beste Quelle: Unsere Augen. Also durch die Gegend laufen und sich Sachen notieren oder direkt mit einem Editor auf dem Smartphone erfassen/ändern - Weitere Quellen: Prinzipiell sind die Bi... commented 2025-10-24 13:35:46 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 172319480 (Comments: 1) | Carmen Hall (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-10-24 13:29:59 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| 157149566 (Comments: 1) | Olsza_R (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, ta nazwa "Rofa" jest tylko w źródłach historycznych i nie jest już używana, prawda? commented 2025-10-24 13:29:08 UTC by YomanNH ♦387 |
| 172723942 (Comments: 3) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Posprzątałem po tym ruskim trollu. commented 2025-10-24 13:22:18 UTC by YomanNH ♦387 |
| 173680687 (Comments: 2) | RSR2003 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. No response has been given, and, in conversation with other mappers, it appears that no one actually uses the names and modifications you are using. Besides, you are only changing the name:es tag in most of the changes, which doesn't make... commented 2025-10-24 13:20:30 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544 |
| 173707756 (Comments: 1) | STRANNIK_MINSK (Discussed changesets: 4) | Добрый день. Пожалуйста, поаккуратнее с удалением линий. Вы удалили здание больницы. Пришлось его восстанавливать. И я очень попрош... commented 2025-10-24 13:19:41 UTC by Prusaker ♦144 |
| 173699982 (Comments: 3) | 96arsh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi 96arsh :) thanks for contributing. Much appreciated. I'd like to point out a couple of things to help you make better decicions in the future: - Trent Bridge is a statium. The pitch is inside. Please change it back to lei... commented 2025-10-24 13:17:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675 |
| 168982468 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Wycofałem nadanie nazw do uliczek wewnątrz osiedla. commented 2025-10-24 13:12:13 UTC by YomanNH ♦387 |
| 173717326 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 163) | The accidentally created node was deleted in changeset 173717543 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173717543 commented 2025-10-24 13:11:59 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178 |
| 152474054 (Comments: 1) | Thelone1986 (Discussed changesets: 4) | bonjour, la ville considère ce chemin comme aménagé pour vélo > hihway = cycleway + foot:yes ? commented 2025-10-24 13:07:31 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15 |
| 159408332 (Comments: 1) | Thelone1986 (Discussed changesets: 4) | bonjour, la ville considère ce chemin comme aménagé pour vélo > hihway = cycleway + foot:yes ? commented 2025-10-24 13:07:14 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15 |
| 173672844 (Comments: 1) | Yehudah777 (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted: officially there is just no such thing as daba within Tbilisi admin structure. There is Vake raioni, and within it Tsqneti ubani (which includes everything up to Betania). So Tsqneti now qualifies only as an unofficial place, that is, neigh... commented 2025-10-24 13:07:07 UTC by yelisey90 ♦184 |
| 173712562 (Comments: 1) | emret (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dzg emret. Wanneer de toegangsweg door het gebouw loopt geen layer=-2 gebruiken. Het is gewoon eigenlijk layer=0 en dat taggen we niet. Onder een gebouw gebruik je dan covered=yes als extra tag. Kijk je nog even? MVG eggie commented 2025-10-24 13:07:02 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 173696116 (Comments: 1) | ZMHtay (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Please use the key man_made instead of "man made". commented 2025-10-24 13:03:32 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173691931 (Comments: 1) | Vasco Jesus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bom dia, Fizeste bastante alterações, no entanto não forneceste fontes para as mesmas. Modificaste a hierarquia de vias de secundária para primária: - Alameda da Europa - Alameda Pêro da Co... commented 2025-10-24 12:56:04 UTC by JoaoPaixao ♦15 |
| 173714803 (Comments: 1) | Robin343 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-24 12:55:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,190 |
| 75587796 (Comments: 2) | MossWaffles (Discussed changesets: 2) | Alas, talk of "fiction" here seems to have put this mapper off contributing - they made no more edits after this. I walked along Apperley Road last night and noticed some problems remain, such as you can see at https://www.openstreet... commented 2025-10-24 12:47:40 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 173715813 (Comments: 2) | Kitsunderoku>w^ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Basado en tus ediciones de mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he redactado una sugerencia para lo que podría parecer un comentario: "Agregué árbol con transformador, detalles de hoja caduca y latifoliada" (Auto-transl... commented 2025-10-24 12:46:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173706895 (Comments: 2) | Mattingham83 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, you're quite correct! I'll change it back. Thanks for letting me know. commented 2025-10-24 12:45:58 UTC by Mattingham83 ♦2 |
| 173689917 (Comments: 2) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-24 12:36:58 UTC by ICT_maps ♦6 |
| 173558918 (Comments: 1) | mini-me (Discussed changesets: 48) | Спасибо за помощь commented 2025-10-24 12:36:54 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152 |
| 154735406 (Comments: 6) | alinratna (Discussed changesets: 6) | > not sure I fully understood what you meant In my 29th and 30th changes is was still learning how to map things - "Is X better mapped as a Y or a Z": https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/26579848 . https://ww... commented 2025-10-24 12:14:35 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 166638523 (Comments: 1) | CRA666 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zmiana wycofana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173714882 Nie został zmieniony obszar działalności, a budynek. Wcześniejsze dodanie nazwy na budynek było minimalną zmianą, ale nadal dobrą. Poprawię na właściwszy spos&oac... commented 2025-10-24 12:13:49 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267 |
| 172933019 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Wycofałem zestaw zmian. Przystanek jest fikcją, jak wiele innych, które tworzyłeś. commented 2025-10-24 12:13:43 UTC by YomanNH ♦387 |
| 173714734 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 102) | Budynku wojskowego. commented 2025-10-24 12:09:06 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267 |
| 173709173 (Comments: 4) | Nord Ambulanse2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks Marek-M. commented 2025-10-24 12:06:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173709369 (Comments: 4) | Nord Ambulanse2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks Marek-M. commented 2025-10-24 12:05:58 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636 |
| 173709586 (Comments: 1) | FirePape (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, hier habe ich keine Anmerkung. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-24 11:40:19 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173709687 (Comments: 1) | FirePape (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen: colour Die Farben folgen der englischen Schreibweise, es müsste also „red“ sein. description Die Anzah... commented 2025-10-24 11:39:09 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 173666011 (Comments: 1) | Coeur de Nacre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Coeur de Nacre, bienvenue dans OSM et merci pour vos premières contributions qui concernent un très bel aménagement de l'interco. Pas simple de positionner correctement tout se petit monde sans imagerie! Je vous prop... commented 2025-10-24 11:24:22 UTC by divaddivag ♦122 |
| 173681365 (Comments: 2) | Rafal G (Discussed changesets: 5) | done commented 2025-10-24 11:19:40 UTC by Rafal G ♦5 |
| 173648227 (Comments: 2) | TranslatorPS (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi, thanks, it means that the Japanese IME keyboard got wonky and I didn't spot that the last word of description got duplicated in the next line when editing. I've now also fixed w175558574 like in the other changeset you managed to commen... commented 2025-10-24 11:16:54 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦38 |
| 171092286 (Comments: 1) | Elbloggers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you added man_made=water_tap to a fountain which doesn’t have a tap. Please check the meaning of water tap, thank you. commented 2025-10-24 11:14:22 UTC by dieterdreist ♦870 |
| 173643511 (Comments: 1) | TranslatorPS (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello (again)! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/175558574. What is the mean of the tag 下がるfrequency = 50? commented 2025-10-24 11:11:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 22606780 (Comments: 1) | Zugführer_BAG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bij Medevoort 18 en 20 is het fout gegaan. Kun je daar nog even naar kijken ? https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.60752&lat=51.46737&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.74&overlays=long_ways... commented 2025-10-24 11:09:21 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,397 |
| 173568627 (Comments: 1) | xugigi222 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2eg1. What is the mean of the tag 材质 = 防腐木板 ? commented 2025-10-24 11:04:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206 |
| 173283405 (Comments: 2) | Richard Sell (Discussed changesets: 1) | O mapeador ignora as mensagens enviadas e comentários abertos sobre sua edição, que introduz uma rua inexistente. Trata-se apenas de um caminho particular. A edição será revertida. Favor contatar a comunidade... commented 2025-10-24 11:03:01 UTC by Tomio ♦27 |
| 173706316 (Comments: 2) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 101) | dzięki za wiadomość, dostaliśmy zgłoszenie o tym, że przejście jest zamknięte. Zweryfikuję raz jeszcze i dokonam edycji. commented 2025-10-24 10:48:49 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦83 |
| 173659308 (Comments: 2) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hoi Wanderer, dankjewel ik houd er rekening mee. Groet, Taurus3 commented 2025-10-24 10:47:14 UTC by Taurus3 ♦7 |
| 173709226 (Comments: 3) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 90) | grazie! commented 2025-10-24 10:45:10 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦33 |
| 173705168 (Comments: 3) | JurajRiccany (Discussed changesets: 8) | However, if you believe some of those are completely wrong or I have miss clicked somewhere, happy if those are corrected. No doubt. commented 2025-10-24 10:41:04 UTC by JurajRiccany ♦1 |
| 173710607 (Comments: 2) | Circe xpst (Discussed changesets: 1) | Basado en tus ediciones de mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he elaborado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Agregué barrera de seto" (Auto-translation) --- Based on your map edits in th... commented 2025-10-24 10:37:15 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132 |
| 173659437 (Comments: 3) | Bontemps1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pas besoin de Python ici ! Le plus simple sera que je te montre en live la semaine prochaine 😀 D'ici là, dis moi de quelle espèce il s'agit, et je l'ajoute si tu veux. commented 2025-10-24 10:35:06 UTC by Sylvain M ♦60 |
| 173710792 (Comments: 1) | VMPanes (Discussed changesets: 62) | [Mariveles, Bataan] Updates around FAB and Lakandula. Improved buildings and POIs. commented 2025-10-24 10:34:32 UTC by VMPanes ♦21 |
| 168159118 (Comments: 1) | Sharky1337 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, bitte schaue mal nach den Ladestationen die du eingetragen hast. "socket:ccs" ist kein gültiger Steckertyp, siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket commented 2025-10-24 10:26:39 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708 |
| 139000914 (Comments: 2) | wierci (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dzieki za uwage! Faktycznie za blisko sciezki ja dalam i sie przypadkowo polaczyly. Juz poprawione :) commented 2025-10-24 10:25:27 UTC by wierci ♦5 |
| 173416855 (Comments: 1) | Erasmus Albatros (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Erasmus, kannst du bitte mal prüfen, ob du versehentlich diesen Knoten verschoben hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3087470425/history#map=19/52.155918/11.412471&layers=N commented 2025-10-24 10:23:22 UTC by AlexSpritze ♦22 |
| 171712187 (Comments: 1) | nathan_witmer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. About mapping and tagging highways. A schort local connecting road between 2 other roads is never a secundary highway. At best an unclassified highway. Check the wiki about tagging highways. https://wiki.ope... commented 2025-10-24 10:16:47 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| 173682688 (Comments: 3) | GKremp (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, nein, wir erfassen keine Daten für das Auslesen eines einzelnen Users. Du musst eine andere Lösung dafür finden. Z.B. im Wikipedia-Namen steht das (Bonn), damit würde ich arbeiten. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-24 10:16:23 UTC by limes11 ♦962 |
| 172486440 (Comments: 4) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 107) | This is the sort of thing where I really should write an OSM diary entry describing what I'm doing and why! When I start adding the actual restrictions, I'll write something. commented 2025-10-24 10:14:27 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645 |
| 171711418 (Comments: 1) | nathan_witmer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while still selected. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-10-24 10:08:17 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| 165691979 (Comments: 4) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 38) | The banner at the top of the Commons category informs people that there's copyright issues, deleting it would make this issue less clear to Commons contributors, so I doubt it will be deleted. But if it is it should be removed from this OSM feat... commented 2025-10-24 09:58:59 UTC by spughetti ♦116 |
 | 173707613 (Comments: 1) | NABILTR90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | الدكتور محمد نبيل الطرشان commented 2025-10-24 09:39:36 UTC by NABILTR90 ♦1 |
| 170447696 (Comments: 1) | nov318 (Discussed changesets: 4) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. Please keep these comments in mind when you adress next mapathlon. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in acc... commented 2025-10-24 09:36:40 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954 |
| 173705296 (Comments: 3) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Пардон, имала е таг building=apartments. А по отношение на тел. номера, "+" се слага пред "359" и след това има интервал. commented 2025-10-24 09:32:33 UTC by Fraxi ♦169 |
| 173706943 (Comments: 1) | Komboj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-24 09:30:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740 |
| 173707080 (Comments: 1) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 138) | CS-Kommentar: Ergänzungen Naturschutzgebiet commented 2025-10-24 09:03:26 UTC by surveyor54 ♦659 |
| 170664900 (Comments: 1) | KennethMurray (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706418 where the changeset comment is: Remove spam commented 2025-10-24 08:44:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 172428490 (Comments: 10) | SWN-MP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, interessant wäre die Fragestellung, wie der Router die Verbindung zum Straßengraphen herstellt. Über Objekte in OSM oder über eine Suche "nach dem nächsten Punkt auf einem highway". Viel Erfolg, ich bi... commented 2025-10-24 08:43:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084 |
| 170664987 (Comments: 1) | KennethMurray (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706401 where the changeset comment is: Remove spam commented 2025-10-24 08:43:44 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 170665066 (Comments: 1) | KennethMurray (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706384 where the changeset comment is: Remove spam commented 2025-10-24 08:43:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173705280 (Comments: 4) | KennethMurray (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706360 where the changeset comment is: Remove spam commented 2025-10-24 08:42:44 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173662696 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 163) | Maxweight tag fixed in 173706193 Changed from maxweight:hgv:conditional to maxweigh:conditional https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173706193 commented 2025-10-24 08:39:27 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178 |
| 173654128 (Comments: 1) | TMomä (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hei! En tunne tapausta kovin hyvin, mutta kerrottakoon ettei ole suositeltavaa poistaa OSM:stä teitä vain sen takia ettei niillä pääse kulkemaan. OSM pyrkii kuvaamaan maastona sellaisena kun se on. Siellä missä on t... commented 2025-10-24 08:38:50 UTC by houtari ♦53 |
| 173577561 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 163) | Maxweight tag fixed in 173705667 Changed from maxweight:hgv:conditional to maxweigh:conditional https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173705667 commented 2025-10-24 08:24:49 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178 |
| 169755973 (Comments: 1) | Xiaomi HyperOS 12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Пожалуйста не пишите КАПСОМ названия + устанавливайте тип кухни. А лучше для редактирования карты используйте EveryDoor ! commented 2025-10-24 08:17:57 UTC by Константин Гам ♦740 |