| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 187291986 (Comments: 4) | Godux (Discussed changesets: 1) | Not sure about the error i was trying to fix, it was two months ago. I suppose it was emphasized in red in Vespucci, but i am not sure why i decided to use "Protected area" instead of "protected_area". commented 2026-09-26 21:20:46 UTC by Godux ♦1 |
 | 166587354 (Comments: 4) | DaveF (Discussed changesets: 181) | You, telling me my edits were incomplete, were "aggressive". commented 2026-09-26 21:14:22 UTC by DaveF ♦1,688 |
 | 184016299 (Comments: 15) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 15) | Although I am not so much familiar with LP, I just make a general comment from a neutral view. As a user editing the trails very often, I completely agree with the comment by @{kevin open street}. Clicking a relationship and then finding hundreds o... commented 2026-09-26 21:04:15 UTC by cdl02930 ♦2 |
| 179829550 (Comments: 8) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 29) | Salut, Mathias, Ça arrive décrire un peu vite (par manque de temps), de se relire et se dire qu’on a été un peu sec. Effectivement, j’ai ajouté une ... commented 2026-09-26 20:57:55 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦165 |
 | 189600948 (Comments: 1) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 113) | Pour "Mairie" à Confignon serait qu'un arrêt de bus? commented 2026-09-26 20:56:50 UTC by 9_tab ♦152 |
 | 189604389 (Comments: 1) | UL-mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi, Dat verwijderen ligt wat gevoelig binnen OSM. Er wordt verschillende over gedacht. Het staat al getagd als abandoned... Wanneer je echt bijna niets meer ziet dan kun je ook razed gebruiken. En dan even toegespitst op bijn... commented 2026-09-26 20:47:47 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
 | 189309377 (Comments: 5) | MaciekMma (Discussed changesets: 18) | > Przyznam, ze mnie zaskoczyles tym spostrzezeniem, ale w rzeczy samej sa to DDR-ki. Co jakiś czas trochę skaczę po Polsce i staram się wychwytywać i poprawiać błędne mapowanie CPRów. Akurat dotknąłeś tego obiektu, więc w... commented 2026-09-26 20:46:13 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,488 |
 | 189603661 (Comments: 1) | roundjackal13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I accidentally created a duplicate. commented 2026-09-26 20:31:46 UTC by roundjackal13 ♦1 |
 | 185420016 (Comments: 3) | Szántó András 82 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Az, hogy nem a címkézési előírásokat veszed figyelembe. Nem az Nvtv. alapján kerülnek meghatározásra az usage mező használata, hanem a wiki alapján. Az alapján a 66-o... commented 2026-09-26 20:31:10 UTC by balint36 ♦300 |
 | 189596400 (Comments: 7) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Es steht irgendwo auf der shop Seite IIRC. Ich bin aber auch kein Fan davon aus deinem genannten Grund. Ich wollte nur nicht einfach den Tag komplett entfernen. Mach das aber sehr gerne! Ich bin da ganz deiner Meinung. FYI: Es gibt 72 shops mit sport... commented 2026-09-26 20:29:15 UTC by elnappo ♦6 |
 | 185026863 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 41) | not sure you were the one that touched it, but the correct for cycling/walking path on ibn gvirol is this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=sidewalk commented 2026-09-26 20:28:56 UTC by Dindia ♦63 |
 | 169526420 (Comments: 1) | DHuthmann (Discussed changesets: 13) | What is this line for? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417611215 commented 2026-09-26 20:28:10 UTC by martin-kokos ♦48 |
| 189063909 (Comments: 4) | Hahaxghu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Zelf ben ik geen fan van apps als Organic en/of CoMaps. Vooral die adressen bewerken geeft steeds problemen. Goed dat je een terugkoppeling hebt gedaan naar de app ontwikkelaar. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-26 20:07:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
 | 189598432 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 89) | sí, el addr:street de toda la calle es Las Llanas zumarkalea. Que coincida con la vía. commented 2026-09-26 20:07:53 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦351 |
| 187522842 (Comments: 1) | sdwfe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, Bitte achte künftig bei Löschungen darauf, ob Relationen (hier: Radrouten und Pilgerwege) beteiligt sind. Diese Relationen wurden unterbrochen und mussten aufwändig wieder geflickt... commented 2026-09-26 20:04:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 189601954 (Comments: 1) | kevinparsonsjr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kev. Address info should not be on roads, but on buildings. Abbreviations should be expanded, South for S, Road for Road, etc. I've adjusted. commented 2026-09-26 19:58:56 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 184066507 (Comments: 1) | StinkerWiesenHautzen161 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sind die Namen dort tatsächlich gebräuchlich, oder wolltest du nur gerne ein paar Namen in der Karte sehen? commented 2026-09-26 19:57:36 UTC by Tatfahren ♦384 |
| 189363381 (Comments: 2) | ירח אפל (Discussed changesets: 12) | שים לב שאני סך הכל פיצלתי כיכר שכבר הייתה במפה ונוספה בעריכה https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1554565506/history/1 בהחלט לא מחקתי תיקון שלך, ואכן אני שם לב שאת... commented 2026-09-26 19:56:28 UTC by ירח אפל ♦8 |
| 189594176 (Comments: 2) | elGros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, gràcies, en prenc nota commented 2026-09-26 19:46:02 UTC by elGros ♦1 |
| 189087472 (Comments: 1) | B_KSL (Discussed changesets: 133) | Wielkie dzięki za ogarnięcie błędów :) Tylko zostawiłeś mi 3 dziury w zagospodarowniu terenu ale już je wypełniłem https://www.osm.org/changeset/189602947 commented 2026-09-26 19:45:02 UTC by Paweł_M ♦49 |
 | 94593628 (Comments: 2) | miroslavuzice87 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hey Mateusz, it was a typo, I just changed it. Thank you! commented 2026-09-26 19:42:21 UTC by miroslavuzice87 ♦36 |
| 189401143 (Comments: 1) | SpeedBlade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Even BMX bikes not allowed? commented 2026-09-26 19:41:00 UTC by mbeyerle ♦53 |
 | 189586626 (Comments: 2) | Toli99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Вибачаюсь. Буду ретельніше перевіряти. Дякую) commented 2026-09-26 19:38:16 UTC by Toli99 ♦4 |
| 188259675 (Comments: 1) | Yipper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yipper, welcome to OSM. I see you deleted the business, building and address node at 6 Coryell Street. Was the building demolished, or just the business gone. The address should still be there. Probably want to use the disued tag, see this item a... commented 2026-09-26 19:32:21 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 167782983 (Comments: 1) | BeheerHet (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Beheer.. Alleen een naam doet niets in osm. Ook de aard van een bedrijf toevoegen. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-26 19:24:01 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
 | 189523082 (Comments: 1) | guol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi guol, good work, but you mapped some buildings over buildings you already mapped before. For example see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1562101650/history commented 2026-09-26 19:21:20 UTC by atlasmountains ♦4 |
 | 189283602 (Comments: 1) | Abdu88llah (Discussed changesets: 1) | شكرا جزيلا لكم على إضافاتكم المثرية والنافعة commented 2026-09-26 19:14:06 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦766 |
| 188570186 (Comments: 1) | saud102030 (Discussed changesets: 1) | أخي الكريم الخريطة عامة والأماكن الخاصة والشخصية لا يسمح بوجودها ونعتذر منكم لحذها commented 2026-09-26 19:05:01 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦766 |
| 189543778 (Comments: 4) | Fox_45 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Il reste encore des relations à corriger cf les liens ci-dessus. Mais déjà bravo pour les corrections effectuées, ce n'est pas facile ! commented 2026-09-26 18:55:47 UTC by mga_geo ♦346 |
 | 188601617 (Comments: 2) | Lucas_semK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opa Fábio! O problema que você apontou é da camada de visualização Openstreetmap Carto e está sendo abordado principalmente no repositório desse projeto (https://github.com/openstreetmap-carto/openstree... commented 2026-09-26 18:54:42 UTC by Lucas_semK ♦3 |
| 189601788 (Comments: 1) | Wereldkaart123 (Discussed changesets: 32) | https://www.ad.nl/amersfoort/na-52-jaar-sluit-het-eerste-italiaanse-restaurant-van-amersfoort-de-deuren-antonio-zegt-pizzaparadijs-o-sole-mio-vaarwel~aa2143e1/ commented 2026-09-26 18:51:28 UTC by Wereldkaart123 ♦32 |
| 144058342 (Comments: 1) | jleedev (Discussed changesets: 25) | is this part 4/5 intentional? Asking due to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150064428 that should be simply par=3 without that extra sign, right? asking due to https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2964 commented 2026-09-26 18:46:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 133111096 (Comments: 3) | themd (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150064428 that should be simply par=3 without that extra sign, right? asking due to https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2964 commented 2026-09-26 18:46:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189557019 (Comments: 1) | Mariusz 2M (Discussed changesets: 50) | Po co dodajesz jednoelementowe relacje multipolygon? To jest błędna praktyka commented 2026-09-26 18:43:51 UTC by syntex ♦910 |
| 189447101 (Comments: 5) | Monchinho (Discussed changesets: 48) | >Puxen ese "da" en name:gl porque o artigo forma parte do topónimo, pero como non figura no cartel físico da rúa non toquei "name" Recorda que "name" debe ser igual que "name:gl".... commented 2026-09-26 18:36:49 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦376 |
| 164433895 (Comments: 1) | Samuell Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 18) | Não adicione linhas sem tags, relações sem nome ou geometrias genéricas no mapa. commented 2026-09-26 18:32:14 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,672 |
| 184112519 (Comments: 1) | Paderborner Schlüsseldienst (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, hier hab ich auch einiges gefixed. Hier war das Wohngebiet zu einem Gebäude umgetagged. Der POI mit dem Schlüsseldienst hab ich in den Gebäudeoutline verschoben. Flo commented 2026-09-26 18:18:00 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 184112356 (Comments: 1) | Paderborner Schlüsseldienst (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, das hier ist glaube ich was schief gelaufen - mitten in dem Park ist kein schlüsseldienst Ich lösche den mal. commented 2026-09-26 18:13:30 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 189586784 (Comments: 2) | BeheerHet (Discussed changesets: 4) | BGT https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?theme=BGT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=257206.90278405577&geometry.y=472146.80052004964&zoomlevel=13.13498349040294 commented 2026-09-26 18:12:29 UTC by 74523978 ♦111 |
 | 159141295 (Comments: 2) | ausdread (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola! y además de esto, está mapeada como access=no, lo que hace que no se posible rutear por allí para ningún navegador. Si nos comentás un poco podemos colaborar a arreglarlas. Saludos! commented 2026-09-26 18:03:12 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦170 |
| 189581159 (Comments: 1) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 58) | Ook hier vraag ik me af: waarom deze wijziging? Vooral way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444707029 Het is gewoon een grasveld met wat bomen erop. Deze heb je zelf nota bene gemapt. Waarom zou dit een bos zijn? commented 2026-09-26 17:57:52 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦72 |
| 188497509 (Comments: 2) | wolfgang8741 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for catching this, yes it should be sports. I fixed and added the brand tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189599734 commented 2026-09-26 17:53:03 UTC by wolfgang8741 ♦48 |
| 189581587 (Comments: 3) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 58) | In Nederlandse steden vind je bijna geen groen wat niet onderhouden wordt. Dat het niet in een rechthoekige vorm is geknipt betekent niet dat het niet worden onderhouden. Daarnaast zegt de wiki: Shrubbery may also be planted and maintained by huma... commented 2026-09-26 17:44:08 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦72 |
| 188070536 (Comments: 1) | Samuell Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 18) | O que seria "mapa do lic" citado como fonte? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188070536 commented 2026-09-26 17:43:24 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,672 |
| 185502077 (Comments: 3) | Rico557 (Discussed changesets: 65) | I'll keep that in mind. Thank you. commented 2026-09-26 17:37:48 UTC by Rico557 ♦145 |
| 189581058 (Comments: 2) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yes - do you have doubts about a specific saddle? Please consider: The saddles were already part of the road. commented 2026-09-26 17:35:05 UTC by rumbrummer ♦19 |
| 189470802 (Comments: 2) | Jiri Podhorecky (Discussed changesets: 28) | ok, máš pravdu. Když jsem to zakresloval. skutečně jsem o tom přemýšel a vždy se snažím rozeznat zda pozemek vykazuje znaky školního pozemku. Tady mi to tak přišlo. To že tam je i &u... commented 2026-09-26 17:28:18 UTC by Jiri Podhorecky ♦21 |
| 189469598 (Comments: 2) | Jiri Podhorecky (Discussed changesets: 28) | ano. Tento objekt jsem shodou okolností jen upravoval tvar, nepřidával jsem tagy. Nevšiml jsem si co tam bylo zapsáno. commented 2026-09-26 17:24:49 UTC by Jiri Podhorecky ♦21 |
| 189429353 (Comments: 4) | lbilldt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yeah, eliminating the "rough-in" would be preferred. It's sets off all sort of Q/A alarms and causes me and others extra work. It's better to just leave your work unsubmitted until you have things polished. Thanks. I don�... commented 2026-09-26 17:22:26 UTC by b-jazz ♦951 |
 | 189591358 (Comments: 1) | simon04 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Two photos of EV9 signs: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:EuroVelo_9_in_Croatia commented 2026-09-26 17:21:29 UTC by simon04 ♦47 |
| 189598246 (Comments: 1) | Natura (Discussed changesets: 38) | Huhu Natura, wärst du so nett und würdest den Änderungskommentar nur dann verwenden, wenn du tatsächlich die Relation an die Wegweisung anpasst ? Das ist so etwas verwirrend. Was genau änderst du eigentlich ? ... commented 2026-09-26 17:19:01 UTC by limes11 ♦1,106 |
| 189564890 (Comments: 1) | Charles Linus Brown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Charles Linus Brown, willkommen bei OSM und Glückwunsch zu deiner ersten Änderung. Dabei erscheint mir deine Änderung nur dann richtig, wenn entsprechende Strassenschilder den Beginn und Ende von "Riegerau" kennz... commented 2026-09-26 17:15:30 UTC by schoka ♦63 |
 | 185064393 (Comments: 1) | mb64 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! I'm trying to gather as much information on suburbs/quarters of Maribor as I can so I can restructure them a bit (Košaki right now is on the same level as Center četrt, while it's a subarea of Ivan Cankar četrt). Is there a sou... commented 2026-09-26 17:13:28 UTC by Vladislav Grechannik ♦9 |
| 189598067 (Comments: 1) | Saulo De Tarso Guerra Wanderley Filho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Eu te amo commented 2026-09-26 17:04:52 UTC by Saulo De Tarso Guerra Wanderley Filho ♦1 |
 | 189106192 (Comments: 6) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 153) | Can you please re-read my message, I'm not just talking about this edit, I'm talking about the changes you have made in the last two weeks. Also you didn't address any of the problems I pointed out above. Have you been to Ngong Ping re... commented 2026-09-26 16:59:58 UTC by heiman191 ♦1 |
| 183442103 (Comments: 1) | Peloria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5384366 commented 2026-09-26 16:42:51 UTC by qugeb ♦107 |
| 180783611 (Comments: 1) | Snusmumriken (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hi Snusmumriken at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13702246046 you wrote recycling:glass=gate I assume you meant “yes” instead of “gate”. Further I've never seen a recycling bin in France that accepts all ... commented 2026-09-26 16:18:35 UTC by lyctkel ♦380 |
| 77384803 (Comments: 1) | marius851000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used crop=flower on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6996516367/history Have you maybe meant crop=flowers ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some object... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 163920200 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 404) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2797550469/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 63170684 (Comments: 1) | hirsy (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5952206970/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 35209861 (Comments: 1) | yeskela (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957151140/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 156408839 (Comments: 1) | frosm (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3702581428/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 118281078 (Comments: 1) | KVI0n (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9566139237/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 57053913 (Comments: 1) | Borisy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5468858746/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:16:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 57273745 (Comments: 1) | (inativa)o fim (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5485134260/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:16:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 57713896 (Comments: 1) | (inativa)o fim (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5520459576/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:16:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 138847123 (Comments: 1) | KKK-jp (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792294505/history has building:levels = 0.9 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 16:16:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178241217 (Comments: 1) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hello! You used waterway=wei on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13532669995/history Have you maybe meant waterway=weir ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-26 16:15:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 184062002 (Comments: 1) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hello! You used waterway=accesspoint on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5155423063/history Have you maybe meant waterway=access_point ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ... commented 2026-09-26 16:15:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189551066 (Comments: 5) | SuperMarkus (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hallo, im Wiki finde ich naturgemäß keinen Eintrag zu „virtuellen Wegen auf Naturflächen, die gleichzeitig in einem Naturschutzgebiet liegen“ gefunden. Ich orientiere mich an dieser https://community.openstreetma... commented 2026-09-26 16:15:17 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 166226960 (Comments: 1) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 170) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382399003/history has building:levels = 0.9 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 16:15:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187622133 (Comments: 1) | Causeistheffect (Discussed changesets: 1) | For tracking purposes only but not really for solving other types of crimes commented 2026-09-26 16:12:44 UTC by Causeistheffect ♦1 |
| 189595282 (Comments: 1) | MagicPocketbook462 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Just to mention that I'm not staunchly against a "West Barnham" being mapped! I do believe though it should be not tagged as a "suburb" and linked to Wikipedia if that is to happen though. It should be a smaller way/r... commented 2026-09-26 16:02:14 UTC by MagicPocketbook462 ♦19 |
 | 30528832 (Comments: 1) | Laurent@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91017929/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some d... commented 2026-09-26 15:47:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 160135205 (Comments: 1) | Mykhailo25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341308684/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 15:47:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 165047911 (Comments: 1) | Slavisa1212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180758382/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 15:47:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 180106448 (Comments: 1) | Herr Bause (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526691497/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 15:47:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189589790 (Comments: 4) | burningmatt (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem 😀 Veel plezier met mappen. eggie commented 2026-09-26 15:43:06 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189587860 (Comments: 2) | burningmatt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt! commented 2026-09-26 15:42:21 UTC by burningmatt ♦2 |
| 63036160 (Comments: 2) | BER319 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Oh, that was a long time ago, but you're right—it's a typo. The next person working on it didn't notice it either. I've corrected it. commented 2026-09-26 15:34:02 UTC by BER319 ♦116 |
| 189588701 (Comments: 1) | LionOfDelly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-26 15:29:31 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
 | 189302881 (Comments: 2) | Aapo 56th (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei. Huomiona että editorissa avautuva tausta "Helsinki region ortophoto" on melko vanha. Nyt esim. siirtämäsi rakennus (Monumentti) on virheellisessä sijainnissa. Lisäsit rakennuksen/rakennelman "raivoraitti ... commented 2026-09-26 15:28:35 UTC by joovan ♦1 |
 | 188129289 (Comments: 2) | evdence (Discussed changesets: 86) | 👍 commented 2026-09-26 15:28:13 UTC by evdence ♦42 |
| 185046227 (Comments: 1) | NTKillerton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. While mapping farmyards to the north of Exeter, I noticed that there is a series of permissive tracks and footways over fields to the south of Columbjohn Farm. They don't obviously show on current Bing imagery. Some do appear to follow some... commented 2026-09-26 15:26:14 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦29 |
| 160825811 (Comments: 2) | Lužicki Bieluch (Discussed changesets: 39) | Jak coś to na spokojnie można wycofać, już wszystkie z tego changeseta przerzuciłem do OHMu commented 2026-09-26 15:18:30 UTC by Lužicki Bieluch ♦29 |
| 189554593 (Comments: 1) | Domi1504 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nie wprowadzamy adresu na poi w momencie gdy poi jest na budynku z adresem commented 2026-09-26 15:17:29 UTC by toster234 ♦22 |
| 189567632 (Comments: 3) | opensourceisbetter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it, Thanks for getting back to me. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, ... commented 2026-09-26 15:13:15 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 66131356 (Comments: 2) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Yes. I have fixed it. commented 2026-09-26 15:11:47 UTC by maxolasersquad ♦97 |
| 188039207 (Comments: 1) | joelmatos (Discussed changesets: 4) | joelmatos, please write you changesets description with more details. All changesets from you that I see are described only as "local updates". Every changeset is an update and it's nice if it's a local change so you should mentio... commented 2026-09-26 15:10:35 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦446 |
| 189548204 (Comments: 1) | profe_sabri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buen día! buenísimo el agregado. ¿Por casualidad sabés la numeración? En las paralelas a Jeanette Campbell no están.. commented 2026-09-26 15:06:43 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦170 |
| 189554244 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 48) | Bonjour, Les informations sur le POI sont toujours erronées notamment par rapport à l'adresse, pouvez vous faire le nécessaire ? Merci commented 2026-09-26 14:40:48 UTC by jbcharron ♦192 |
 | 189525593 (Comments: 3) | moaxed (Discussed changesets: 15) | ok, lycka till! Bra att du delar upp det i mindre bitar också, jag vill inte att vi har en mega-heath (t.ex. så stort som Grönland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7662545) :D Finns kanske risk dock att någon f&oum... commented 2026-09-26 14:35:08 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦33 |
| 189559163 (Comments: 1) | Pavel Chepelev (Discussed changesets: 1) | добрый день. Подскажитие, почему вы решили, что по этой дороге запрещен проход и проезд? https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CXQ8AJz6 commented 2026-09-26 14:21:18 UTC by literan ♦7,236 |
 | 189573113 (Comments: 1) | Uyt555 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset you changed name:en from Turkey to T. I assume this may have been accidental, since your changeset comment refers to the 2022 naming change. T is not a valid English country name, so this edit shou... commented 2026-09-26 14:17:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
 | 189573291 (Comments: 1) | Uyt555 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. name:en in OSM is intended for the name used by English speakers, not necessarily the official diplomatic/UN name. "Ivory Coast" remains in current English usage, while the official English/UN form "Côt... commented 2026-09-26 14:16:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
| 189590448 (Comments: 1) | м1т (Discussed changesets: 36) | реестр https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Ftransport.lenobl.ru%2Fmedia%2Fuploads%2Fuserfiles%2F2026%2F09%2F11%2F%25D0%259F%25D0%25B5%25D1%2580%25D0%25B5%25D1%2587%25D0%25B5%25D0%25BD%25D1%258C_%25D1%2581%25D0%25BC%25... commented 2026-09-26 14:14:18 UTC by м1т ♦20 |
 | 130378870 (Comments: 2) | voschix (Discussed changesets: 78) | Obviously a typo. I fixed a couple. I hope it's limited to a few instances. Overpass turbo seems to be overloaded - I'm having trouble to run any larger search. commented 2026-09-26 14:07:55 UTC by voschix ♦208 |
| 187573679 (Comments: 2) | OpenMapperZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yep, you are right. Sorry, i'm new here and i thought it was Elevation (that is 113m over there). Thanks for fixing it. commented 2026-09-26 14:07:38 UTC by OpenMapperZ ♦1 |
| 61153595 (Comments: 2) | DannyMcD (Discussed changesets: 95) | I've changed the tag to shop=tiles. I believe this was a typo. DannyMcD commented 2026-09-26 14:04:48 UTC by DannyMcD ♦105 |
| 97224889 (Comments: 2) | hofoen (Discussed changesets: 73) | I am referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8306848437 commented 2026-09-26 14:03:47 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189585770 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 28) | Bring it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5540564 commented 2026-09-26 13:58:06 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189579123 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | Towards Route 7. commented 2026-09-26 13:52:49 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 185145802 (Comments: 11) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | A dead end road is a road where no new destinations are reached. A competent routing software will avoid it as part of its functionalities. I stand my ground. commented 2026-09-26 13:52:17 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189508795 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | You interpret it as "private road". I interpret it as "tunnel auxiliary". commented 2026-09-26 13:50:35 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189496918 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | I cannot offer an explanation or a recollection as to why that happened. Sorry for the mistake. commented 2026-09-26 13:48:44 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
 | 189580276 (Comments: 6) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 80) | Вероятно за w1562488221 ти е дало "warning". Ми за да е тунел, трябва да излезе от сградата. Виж как е. commented 2026-09-26 13:47:45 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 185828463 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | As usual, detailed mapping is left as future work by others. Do elaborate this neighbourhood some time later. commented 2026-09-26 13:45:54 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
 | 189546831 (Comments: 6) | TPF0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 我按了你的按钮吗？离开这里，如果没有疑难需要被解决的。 commented 2026-09-26 13:43:56 UTC by TPF0 ♦1 |
 | 188968423 (Comments: 1) | zhgx (Discussed changesets: 1) | OSM에 기여해 주셔서 고맙습니다. OSM은 지도 지물을 매핑하는 곳으로 일반 페인트나 무늬 등은 매핑 대상이 아닙니다. 입간판 등은 가능하나 단순 페인팅된 것은 편집 대상이 아니므로 ... commented 2026-09-26 13:39:40 UTC by adreamy ♦66 |
| 125724208 (Comments: 2) | Hidoo00 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Yes, typo of course :) commented 2026-09-26 13:39:24 UTC by Hidoo00 ♦83 |
| 169672176 (Comments: 1) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 158) | How do I correct this entry? The business is now Mekong. A alfresco Thai Fusion cafe. commented 2026-09-26 13:39:12 UTC by Chester Fester ♦1 |
| 185268030 (Comments: 8) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | I see. The deletion was very likely a careless mistake; the changeset is quite large, could have accidentally missed something. commented 2026-09-26 13:29:39 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 134586892 (Comments: 1) | piterwrc (Discussed changesets: 14) | Czy z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366133897/history cokolwiek pozostało czy rozebrany do zera? commented 2026-09-26 13:27:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189588301 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 651) | per https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137762884 commented 2026-09-26 13:27:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 183188368 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 63) | As confirmed by survey, the two ways on the MS lines you have changed electrifed=no is incorrect... wires remain on the line commented 2026-09-26 13:24:53 UTC by melbournefan ♦14 |
| 189541857 (Comments: 2) | PCK46 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Wpisywałem z jednego zrzutów ekranów jednej aplikacji, którą ktoś wrzucił na Skyscrapercity. Chyba błędnie, bo mogłem patrzeć do góry nogami na relacje i numerację przystanków. commented 2026-09-26 13:13:31 UTC by PCK46 ♦14 |
| 170456308 (Comments: 1) | FoeNyx (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13071571404/history - what bollard=FR:J1 means? commented 2026-09-26 13:09:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188903492 (Comments: 6) | Vazhii (Discussed changesets: 1) | autre vue ici https://www.cirkwi.com/fr/point-interet/5550608-jardins-de-l-eveche Horaires des Jardins de l'Évêché Ouverture À 7h30 en semaine. À 8h les samedis, dimanches et jours f&eacu... commented 2026-09-26 13:09:15 UTC by Vazhii ♦1 |
| 176999762 (Comments: 4) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 65) | De binnenste lijnen zijn oorspronkelijke werk van E. Ik heb die vorm bij het toevoegen van de buitenste lijn ook wat verbeterd qua symmetrie - het oog wil ook wat. Wat joe voorstelt, zou kunnen maar is wel erg veel werk om allemaal weer te veranderen... commented 2026-09-26 13:07:05 UTC by Op'tRad ♦70 |
| 188667542 (Comments: 4) | scarapella (Discussed changesets: 25) | Likewise thank you for all the mapping and quality assurance you do. With a schema less system like OSM it is invaluable to have someone catching the outliers and making the data usable for data consumers. commented 2026-09-26 12:59:18 UTC by scarapella ♦65 |
 | 6255762 (Comments: 1) | LEIF @ Langeland (Discussed changesets: 3) | Du har efterladt en "butik" her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/973789983/history#map=19/54.934914/10.712625&layers=N commented 2026-09-26 12:56:06 UTC by cyclist789 ♦126 |
| 15988304 (Comments: 1) | ClaudeMarani (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used waterway=waterpoint on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2292866924/history Have you maybe meant waterway=water_point ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-09-26 12:55:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 137627561 (Comments: 1) | Amin Fozdar (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182835409/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 12:51:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 150036192 (Comments: 1) | Pablo_BM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255246469/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 12:51:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189501790 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | The problem here is, the bridge expansion joint is not parallel with the road centreline. Some part is over half, some not. commented 2026-09-26 12:36:00 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
 | 188543083 (Comments: 1) | Antisida (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the tag "napr:pl:1 = ქალაქი სენაკი : kalaki senaki" has not been used in any other place. What does it mean, or was it added by mistake? commented 2026-09-26 12:35:17 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
 | 174164834 (Comments: 1) | Manu Stefan (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447224991/history how you can have quarry of ceramic? commented 2026-09-26 12:33:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189534439 (Comments: 1) | euro_maps_2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM All GB railway stations are tagged as nodes. There's a bug in the rendering software which means platforms require the area tag. commented 2026-09-26 12:32:39 UTC by DaveF ♦1,688 |
| 189585536 (Comments: 1) | JeanSebastien (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ce changeset permet de réparer changeset/187035544 et d'autres. commented 2026-09-26 12:26:40 UTC by JeanSebastien ♦11 |
| 187035544 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 48) | J'ai corrigé avec changeset/189585536 Merci de contrôler les informations d'adresse et de position avant de modifier les noeuds. L'un des trois noeuds correspondant à la même marque était situ&ea... commented 2026-09-26 12:25:59 UTC by JeanSebastien ♦11 |
 | 189543322 (Comments: 1) | Pedritope (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. ¿Son dos escuelas seguidas, una en frente de la otra? está bien eso? solo para aclarar --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189543322 commented 2026-09-26 12:18:03 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 178976572 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | Done. commented 2026-09-26 12:12:59 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 15784116 (Comments: 2) | Yod4z (Discussed changesets: 37) | Outch! 13 years ! Yes it's motocycle for cross motorcycle exactly I'll correct it commented 2026-09-26 12:04:08 UTC by Yod4z ♦30 |
 | 172018795 (Comments: 2) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 164) | Thanks. Clearly it is typo which can be spotted by looking at mapillary tag on said object. Resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189584565 commented 2026-09-26 12:02:44 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦742 |
 | 155635143 (Comments: 2) | Gobautista (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changed to building:levels=4 based on linked image (changeset/189584506). commented 2026-09-26 12:01:14 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦203 |
| 188343162 (Comments: 2) | Евгений Камчатка (Discussed changesets: 1) | Уже посмортел трек) commented 2026-09-26 11:59:17 UTC by ednzxt ♦18 |
 | 171626131 (Comments: 2) | segi (Discussed changesets: 31) | áno porobil som viacero apseky s tým pridávaním povrchu vtedy. snažil som sa poopravovať čo som vedel ale tieto cesty III. triedy som opomenul. idem to opraviť commented 2026-09-26 11:51:49 UTC by segi ♦43 |
| 79578041 (Comments: 1) | wisi_ (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, le chateau ne serait-il pas plutôt la grosse demeure juste à côté dans l'ouest ? Vu du ciel le batiment que vous avez identifié "chateau" ressemble plus à un bâtiment agricol... commented 2026-09-26 11:36:14 UTC by zorglubu ♦364 |
| 171239576 (Comments: 3) | segi (Discussed changesets: 31) | pozriem to. je možné že to bolo omylom pred rokom som nastavoval viacerým cestám povrch. vďaka za kontrolu commented 2026-09-26 11:34:48 UTC by segi ♦43 |
| 145784386 (Comments: 1) | neoLithos (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! You used oneway:bicycle=no: on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92417346/history Have you maybe meant oneway:bicycle=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-09-26 11:33:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 161928391 (Comments: 1) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hello! You used oneway:bicycle=no$ on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23744594/history Have you maybe meant oneway:bicycle=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-09-26 11:33:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 171207770 (Comments: 1) | bob3bob3 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello! You used informal=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13108004956/history Have you maybe meant informal=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects... commented 2026-09-26 11:32:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188042920 (Comments: 1) | Alex Kushnaryov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used aerialway=zipline on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14125039120/history Have you maybe meant aerialway=zip_line ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2026-09-26 11:32:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188122816 (Comments: 1) | Bob3131 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used aerialway=chairlift on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2191614812/history Have you maybe meant aerialway=chair_lift ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-09-26 11:32:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 36961577 (Comments: 1) | Grozav Nicolae (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223968741/history has building:levels = P+4 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-26 11:32:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 176017640 (Comments: 1) | Kerploonk (Discussed changesets: 19) | Eru gefnar út opnunartímar verslunarkjarnans? commented 2026-09-26 11:25:34 UTC by Morten Lange ♦58 |
| 189569084 (Comments: 1) | Brynnan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi -- is there a reason the house number was removed with this update? commented 2026-09-26 11:23:55 UTC by noahheffron ♦30 |
| 179766222 (Comments: 1) | Pyknite (Discussed changesets: 8) | You might have overwritten actual street names. Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79379857/history/10 and similar. commented 2026-09-26 11:12:48 UTC by 9_tab ♦152 |
| 189580693 (Comments: 1) | PlaneEight (Discussed changesets: 1) | Source: Local knowledge forgot to add that commented 2026-09-26 10:57:10 UTC by PlaneEight ♦1 |
 | 144981331 (Comments: 1) | NicaTopo (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! You used genus=saccarum on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426966895/history Have you maybe meant genus=Saccharum ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ob... commented 2026-09-26 10:55:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189573661 (Comments: 1) | Semolinajoe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You're quite right; it's not a PRoW, but it is a ground feature clearly visible on imagery and to all who may pass by. Therefore, I've reinstated it. I've amended the tags to access=agricultura... commented 2026-09-26 10:51:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,381 |
| 189580870 (Comments: 1) | Thewtgg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv! A Kínai sárkány szobrot teljesen elbontották? https://www.kozterkep.hu/24110 commented 2026-09-26 10:49:16 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189363766 (Comments: 3) | galacticism (Discussed changesets: 8) | Strange, QA flagged it as a highway/water crossing. Must have been stale data before your change. Sorry to have bothered. commented 2026-09-26 10:41:12 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,526 |
| 31252482 (Comments: 3) | HWST (Discussed changesets: 4) | edited in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345949660 (JOSM is not mandatory) commented 2026-09-26 10:39:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 117708462 (Comments: 3) | B_KSL (Discussed changesets: 133) | dzięki! commented 2026-09-26 10:37:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189507462 (Comments: 1) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! You used barrier=y on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/992981657/history Have you maybe meant barrier=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-26 10:36:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 182091978 (Comments: 1) | hombresigma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used barrier=y on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13785496617/history Have you maybe meant barrier=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 10:36:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 185506793 (Comments: 2) | PluMGMK (Discussed changesets: 31) | Oops, muscle memory fail! Yes, it's a typo, I'll go fix it now! commented 2026-09-26 10:25:46 UTC by PluMGMK ♦27 |
| 182142628 (Comments: 1) | segi (Discussed changesets: 31) | Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1508012281 isn't tertiary, don't copy properties of neighbouring roads. Also please use more useful changeset descriptions, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . ... commented 2026-09-26 10:23:42 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 148018370 (Comments: 2) | TS-R (Discussed changesets: 12) | You are right. It was a typo. Now it is fixed. Thank you commented 2026-09-26 10:21:33 UTC by TS-R ♦12 |
| 185262373 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | There's no difference in terms of `=give_way` upstream of the X, and possibly processed for a non-existent give-way again between the X and `junction=roundabout` in upper-left. All this does is removing the gap that may suggest an island above ... commented 2026-09-26 10:14:41 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,050 |
| 118031773 (Comments: 2) | legofahrrad (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi Mateusz! The value was by mistake – it was intended to mean poster_box. I fixed the object. Thanks for the hint! commented 2026-09-26 10:10:52 UTC by legofahrrad ♦187 |
| 189547535 (Comments: 1) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-26 10:08:58 UTC by jayaddison ♦52 |
| 189294021 (Comments: 5) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 96) | I've asked at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:charge:conditional#multiple_charges_selects_last_one commented 2026-09-26 09:50:03 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189376608 (Comments: 3) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 319) | Ok thanks for the explanation. I've restored to the opening_hours based on what my StreetComplete edit set. commented 2026-09-26 09:41:10 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
 | 188145032 (Comments: 1) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello dima :) Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contributions :) I’m one of the volunteers, and I'm writing to you because you have added "review requested" to your changeset https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-09-26 09:39:33 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦145 |
 | 152309972 (Comments: 1) | eton-tech (Discussed changesets: 4) | hi. why did you add 3 address points here, two of which are totally duplicated? can you fix that? commented 2026-09-26 09:26:19 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦418 |
| 188170429 (Comments: 1) | Nikolas_K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Καλησπέρα Νικόλα, Καλώς ήρθες στο OpenStreetMap και να είσ&a... commented 2026-09-26 09:25:55 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦145 |
| 188037637 (Comments: 3) | Cerritus (Discussed changesets: 7) | a good thing that I have not tried "fixing" it then... And thanks even more for your mapping! commented 2026-09-26 09:03:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189269961 (Comments: 1) | Malisa Pecanica (Discussed changesets: 7) | please source your edits to confirm they are real. i am warning you for now, might report you to OSM staff if you do not comply within your next edits. Best regards commented 2026-09-26 08:47:43 UTC by 5mister7 ♦19 |
| 189092595 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 南沙-外港目前无运营 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:16 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189106598 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:12 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189115936 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:09 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189116391 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:06 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189136213 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:03 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189136306 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:00 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189144965 (Comments: 2) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签；无故将地面道路与隧道合并 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:56 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189145073 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将地面道路标注为隧道 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:52 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189146272 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 广深沿江高速并非沈海高速的组成部分；露天道路不应与隧道合并 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:49 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189147554 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 该路段并非沈海高速，不应将正确的出口编号改为G15里程数 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:46 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189190136 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 广深沿江高速并非沈海高速的组成部分 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:42 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189191219 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的修改 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:39 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189235317 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 该路段并非沈海高速，不应将正确的出口编号改为G15里程数 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:35 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189235373 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 此段为沈海高速共线；修改不得随机化 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:33 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189235380 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 道路为桥梁结构，并非隧道 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:29 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189333982 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 露天道路不应与隧道合并 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:26 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189569852 (Comments: 1) | CC_Simon (Discussed changesets: 219) | Really `=uncontrolled`? commented 2026-09-26 08:43:41 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 189091924 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | changeset/189197451 commented 2026-09-26 08:41:13 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189117977 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | changeset/189298534 commented 2026-09-26 08:41:03 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189118654 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | changeset/189298764 commented 2026-09-26 08:40:58 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189190715 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | changeset/189321326 commented 2026-09-26 08:40:44 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189444215 (Comments: 3) | wahoooo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry for my mistyping, I'll fix that right away. As "材塗膳厅" is hanged up at the main entrance, it may be a better practice to have "万人食堂" in alt_name. commented 2026-09-26 08:35:32 UTC by wahoooo ♦2 |
| 189575489 (Comments: 1) | Rundkeks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Die Schreibweise "opening_hours" sollte im BE Format erfolgen. Das Tool kann Helfen: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ commented 2026-09-26 08:35:03 UTC by pitfire ♦757 |
 | 189574111 (Comments: 1) | Rivai Sigit (Discussed changesets: 10) | pertokoan pakainya building=retail, bukan building=commercial commented 2026-09-26 08:27:39 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189575207 (Comments: 1) | Rundkeks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Rundkeks, vermutlich meintest Du einen Laden/Imbiss. Dann fehlt: DE:Tag:amenity=fast_food https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food#Wie_kartieren? VG pitfire commented 2026-09-26 08:21:19 UTC by pitfire ♦757 |
 | 188960427 (Comments: 2) | redleo85 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for noticing. It's fixed. commented 2026-09-26 08:10:39 UTC by redleo85 ♦1 |
| 174739097 (Comments: 1) | luke_unknown (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449255592/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 08:05:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 175124307 (Comments: 1) | Jons Icoli (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326789977/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 08:05:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 109155864 (Comments: 1) | Andrew_pnnl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970407449/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 08:05:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189489225 (Comments: 1) | JTS51 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Beste JTS51, je hebt hiermee https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1560982422 verwijderd die ik een paar dagen eerder heb aangemaakt. En daarna opnieuw ingetekend. Waarom was dat? commented 2026-09-26 07:53:42 UTC by UL-mapper ♦4 |
| 189573880 (Comments: 3) | OmleSpeedy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, it’s had that name for 9 years 😳 commented 2026-09-26 07:48:25 UTC by nevw ♦2,348 |
| 189539938 (Comments: 2) | tovdi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Вовчанське - застаріла (совкова) назва даного населеного пункту. commented 2026-09-26 07:47:47 UTC by tovdi ♦1 |
 | 173140316 (Comments: 1) | martinusK (Discussed changesets: 15) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13208710220 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13208710226 (and the bollards in between) There are tags inside the bollard tag (bollard=removable_bollardbridge=trestle_highway=footway_layer=1). |
| 189571376 (Comments: 1) | uneven5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-26 07:46:13 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
 | 182102052 (Comments: 2) | Anurag92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | well, these name=Roads are obviously not (I am removing them remotely) I think in this case mistake was quite obvious of putting descriptions into names commented 2026-09-26 07:45:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 182700961 (Comments: 1) | Marcus Salles (Discussed changesets: 33) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513995867/history - are you sure that crossing was rebuilt with such physically split carriageways? If yes, from where you have that info? commented 2026-09-26 07:37:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 182208826 (Comments: 1) | KlausG (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13795210534/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has so... commented 2026-09-26 07:34:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 134284562 (Comments: 1) | Diego_Franco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used building=barrack on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158327648/history Have you maybe meant building=barracks ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-09-26 07:32:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 175768017 (Comments: 1) | Derek-Tavira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13367671670/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has so... commented 2026-09-26 07:31:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 69029545 (Comments: 1) | sdicke (Discussed changesets: 38) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6392690156 It is an old edit, but would bollard=230 be meant to be voltage=230? commented 2026-09-26 07:30:00 UTC by Kees 59 ♦131 |
| 185924327 (Comments: 1) | Waldmax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539953 ? commented 2026-09-26 07:26:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188642651 (Comments: 1) | GeoDave5280 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1556666985/history - that barrier is a typo, right? (or was, at least for that specific object - other may remain) commented 2026-09-26 07:25:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 184257064 (Comments: 1) | frickelhanse (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used outdoor_seating=nob on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13949047339/history Have you maybe meant outdoor_seating=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edi... commented 2026-09-26 07:24:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 162984548 (Comments: 2) | Lirum Larum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Mateusz, thank you, you're absolutely right, I don't know why this mistake happened. I fixed it now. commented 2026-09-26 07:22:39 UTC by Lirum Larum ♦13 |
| 138237791 (Comments: 1) | MunichMapper99 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used crossing=traffic_signal on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454510209/history Have you maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it... commented 2026-09-26 07:14:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 138189806 (Comments: 1) | MunichMapper99 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used crossing=traffic_signal on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4704082/history Have you maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (... commented 2026-09-26 07:14:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 138189953 (Comments: 1) | MunichMapper99 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used crossing=traffic_signal on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610621661/history Have you maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it... commented 2026-09-26 07:14:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 174991515 (Comments: 1) | statelyelms (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! You used crossing=traffic_signal on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125836203/history Have you maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace i... commented 2026-09-26 07:13:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 96018226 (Comments: 1) | Giuseppe Masilli (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937172/history has building:levels = Terra that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-26 07:05:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 83758209 (Comments: 1) | Krennel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=san on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51964993/history Have you maybe meant surface=sand ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 07:04:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 177281999 (Comments: 1) | arewelostintheforest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, it's not a good idea to glue footpaths to landuse areas (i.e. sharing nodes between the path and area). It makes it difficult to untangle the two features. Thanks commented 2026-09-26 07:01:20 UTC by Solaris07 ♦36 |
| 181286964 (Comments: 1) | bbmiller (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used surface=unpave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15902897/history Have you maybe meant surface=unpaved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-26 06:56:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 112894052 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 147) | Hello! You used surface=woo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620567083/history Have you maybe meant surface=wood ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 06:54:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 111764385 (Comments: 1) | Rublistoi (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used surface=woo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14867480/history Have you maybe meant surface=wood ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 06:53:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 153752807 (Comments: 1) | AnnDee4444 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used surface=pave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257945432/history Have you maybe meant surface=paved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-09-26 06:53:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 37175749 (Comments: 1) | Cristi Cristian (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397525631/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 06:52:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 171150081 (Comments: 1) | söm4324 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238147120/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 06:52:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 152166715 (Comments: 1) | geowas (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! You used surface=set on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24014477/history Have you maybe meant surface=sett ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 06:49:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 89975955 (Comments: 1) | JuaFritz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used surface=set on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53171933/history Have you maybe meant surface=sett ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 06:49:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 150553965 (Comments: 1) | Eric Bie (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677408720/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 06:48:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 131156394 (Comments: 1) | Danfost (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128295697/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 06:48:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 154719402 (Comments: 1) | 23rfsd25v1c81 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284735554/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 06:48:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189560777 (Comments: 1) | KayViv (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI: holes (the centerline) shouldn't be drawn with so many nodes. See the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole for more info. commented 2026-09-26 06:48:01 UTC by b-jazz ♦951 |
| 189564175 (Comments: 1) | Motolab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. Ik heb wat samengevoegd. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-26 06:24:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189568564 (Comments: 1) | BMJ007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dairy farm commented 2026-09-26 06:12:51 UTC by BMJ007 ♦1 |
 | 182008783 (Comments: 1) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 28) | Cabo Verde commented 2026-09-26 06:05:33 UTC by Uyt555 ♦1 |
| 39973726 (Comments: 2) | Petr1868 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hi, It seems like in past was this field not used according to LPIS. We have only two mapping with "crop=no" and it is for "úhor" (fallow field) and "plocha s kontejnery" (added recently). https://github... commented 2026-09-26 06:04:40 UTC by Marián Kyral ♦87 |
| 189565496 (Comments: 2) | in2itivity (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! The main reason for this change is because I'm not really happy with almost all major and minor arterials in Metro Vancouver being classified as secondary, despite the fact that some are clearly larger than others. Clearly Marine Drive is... commented 2026-09-26 05:58:17 UTC by in2itivity ♦10 |
| 189571392 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | *Put the Water Street District node AT the main crossroads commented 2026-09-26 05:44:50 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 189563486 (Comments: 1) | Dats82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Du er velkommen til at ændre parken; men slet den ikke for at erstatte den med et beskyttet område. commented 2026-09-26 05:27:38 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,927 |
| 189557399 (Comments: 2) | toc-rox (Discussed changesets: 8) | Danke fürs Nacharbeiten. commented 2026-09-26 05:08:15 UTC by toc-rox ♦19 |
| 189333762 (Comments: 1) | Pavlusenko Artem (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. You have used highway classifications that do not match the real road state at all. Please read Wiki page for highway to avoid making mistakes in the future: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:highway commented 2026-09-26 05:07:28 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦28 |
| 189477560 (Comments: 1) | HRZA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I see you put the bridge tag to a highway, but it should be splitted and assigned only to the portion where it really it a bridge. commented 2026-09-26 05:06:29 UTC by AngocA ♦243 |
 | 189435555 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted unexplained suspicious changes by SEO spam account with deliberately nonsensical changeset description (random keystrokes) in changeset 189570258 commented 2026-09-26 04:22:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189435521 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted unexplained suspicious changes by SEO spam account with deliberately nonsensical changeset description (random keystrokes) in changeset 189570258 commented 2026-09-26 04:22:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189435455 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted unexplained suspicious changes by SEO spam account with deliberately nonsensical changeset description (random keystrokes) in changeset 189570258 commented 2026-09-26 04:22:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189488487 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-26 04:19:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189509599 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 17) | This was already tagged as service=driveway. Driveways can have names, too - maybe that's not the case here, but your changeset comment should reflect the change that you are actually making, and ideally why, if it's not immediately apparen... commented 2026-09-26 04:18:59 UTC by citrula ♦1,017 |
| 189487219 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-26 04:17:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189195191 (Comments: 1) | AndreaSchmidtCo (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-26 04:15:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189559404 (Comments: 2) | rafaeldunga (Discussed changesets: 2) | e antes dela, a lei nº 6.747/2016 já havia dado o nome de Rua Doutor José Transfiguração Figueiredo (https://cmgv.gwlegis.com.br/legislacao/7776), ou seja, a via já tem nome há mais de 10 anos! commented 2026-09-26 04:04:44 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦29 |
| 189559387 (Comments: 1) | rafaeldunga (Discussed changesets: 2) | Prezado Rafael, A lei nº 7.197/2020 denominou como rua Jesus Farias, a atual Rua "C" do Bairro Parque Olímpico II (https://www.valadares.mg.gov.br/detalhe-da-legislacao/info/lei-ordinaria-7197-2020/8790) Está... commented 2026-09-26 03:55:49 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦29 |
| 184042104 (Comments: 2) | Designinfo photography (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-26 03:55:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189569709 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | Source: https://gis.dot.nv.gov/trina/ (OSM-Revert does not allow you to specify a source when reverting, so I have to provide it in a comment instead.) commented 2026-09-26 03:54:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 186156930 (Comments: 1) | Uniconnect Immigration Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-26 03:53:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189427387 (Comments: 2) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 55) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date commented 2026-09-26 03:12:46 UTC by Frank Peng ♦230 |
| 189568531 (Comments: 1) | Collinrenk23! (Discussed changesets: 1) | The crossing of first christian church and the parking lot aisle is a covered entrance to the building commented 2026-09-26 02:26:28 UTC by Collinrenk23! ♦1 |
| 189568444 (Comments: 1) | Solaris07 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Didn't intend to upload this just yet. Comment: "Add more wetlands and water areas" commented 2026-09-26 02:18:38 UTC by Solaris07 ♦36 |
| 189318712 (Comments: 1) | Tsibu336 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for taking the time to contribute to the map. I've marked these good though they could definitely do with some improvement. When mapping buildings the goal is to map the footprint of the building, not t... commented 2026-09-26 01:49:18 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 61729605 (Comments: 1) | rjc3000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617506117/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 01:41:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189319977 (Comments: 1) | lanroamer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for taking the time to make this edit! Unfortunately I've reviewed this as bad due to the road you mapped being inaccurate. I've updated the road and added some more details to the area based on Esri imagery which se... commented 2026-09-26 01:40:51 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 86878039 (Comments: 1) | wh_LT (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817551142/history aerialway=explosive ? what it is? it seems related to avalanche blasting - but how? Is there some aerialway setup there for that purpose? commented 2026-09-26 01:39:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 135078468 (Comments: 1) | graham980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817861194/history has building:flats = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to expres... commented 2026-09-26 01:36:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189335959 (Comments: 1) | Metris Party Wall Solutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map. I can't see any problems with the edits you've made but I do have a few small notes. A source wasn't listed for this changeset but I assume from your account name the sou... commented 2026-09-26 01:31:11 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189338833 (Comments: 2) | davidoclubb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Agree with @trigpoint if you want to add details about who operates this consider using the `operator=*` key and it's many subkeys. The wiki page for the `amenity=drinking_water` tag includes a list of tags it may be worth considering adding as ... commented 2026-09-26 01:21:10 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189339671 (Comments: 1) | Mattymooz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can't find any reason for a stop being here either, ty for the contribution! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189339671 commented 2026-09-26 01:17:21 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189553007 (Comments: 1) | m0ntyMaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, revisé el cambio. Gracias! commented 2026-09-26 01:17:14 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 170695459 (Comments: 13) | Davileci (Discussed changesets: 31) | Creo que esta imagen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Railway-station-tagging.svg comete el error de poner railway=stop junto con public_transport=stop_position No siempre tiene que ser así, ya que el stop es una marca en la v&iacut... commented 2026-09-26 01:03:54 UTC by AgusQui ♦651 |
 | 110646046 (Comments: 3) | CharliePlett (Discussed changesets: 25) | wait, maybe it was supposed to be "pin" ? and operator text copied itself onto it? commented 2026-09-26 01:02:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189565629 (Comments: 1) | Menchithecat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. I notice that Island County GIS doesn't show these streets. They have Twin Oaks Lane ending at the 1881 Twin Oaks Lane house. Could these be highway=service with a possible tag of ownership=private and no name tag? |
| 98454261 (Comments: 1) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11979000/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 98519259 (Comments: 1) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17604289/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 154238468 (Comments: 1) | Pfad-Finder (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! You used amenity=ba on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12066995947/history Have you maybe meant amenity=bar ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 183753521 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 143) | Don't know how that happened. Fixed commented 2026-09-26 00:15:20 UTC by Omnific ♦241 |
 | 189553609 (Comments: 3) | tyler_expedia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Q858513 is described as a "district-island of the Bahamas" and links to useful Wikipedia pages. Q3339000 is described as "capital district of the Bahamas" and links to nothing but bot generated stubs. This edit mak... commented 2026-09-26 00:05:23 UTC by InsertUser ♦500 |
| 188037918 (Comments: 3) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 319) | That would have to be the worse tagging proposal I've ever seen. BTW if you read the proposal, these tags are supposed to be on a type=defaults relation not on the boundary relation. If you move the tags to these, then at least they won&#... commented 2026-09-25 23:51:38 UTC by TheSwavu ♦684 |
| 189566336 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Na Av. da independencia o limite de velocidade é 50 km/h commented 2026-09-25 23:48:53 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 145373006 (Comments: 2) | archie (Discussed changesets: 311) | Thank you; as you suspected it should correctly be the plural form. I corrected this mistake. commented 2026-09-25 23:41:04 UTC by archie ♦1,374 |
| 185212538 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 8) | can you explain this edit? commented 2026-09-25 23:37:16 UTC by Natfoot ♦131 |
| 189566107 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | The street addresses and ZIP codes came from OpenWeb. commented 2026-09-25 23:33:33 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 147163728 (Comments: 1) | Oversold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used advertising=sign3 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11593868185/history Have you maybe meant advertising=sign ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-09-25 23:11:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189280332 (Comments: 3) | circle61815971 (Discussed changesets: 6) | with id it may be further confused by kerb=no appearing as translated value in the main interface though feedback on how iD could handle it better (and other things) is welcome! you can open issue at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/... commented 2026-09-25 23:08:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189564226 (Comments: 2) | FDOT_Ryan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Happy to help. This area is very confusing to say the least. -Ryan commented 2026-09-25 23:06:39 UTC by FDOT_Ryan ♦7 |
| 4867281 (Comments: 1) | alv (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/945028/history that should be destination_sign - right? (I wanted to double-check my edit) commented 2026-09-25 23:02:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 31274458 (Comments: 1) | HWST (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used roof:shape=dom on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346157691/history Have you maybe meant roof:shape=dome ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ob... commented 2026-09-25 23:01:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 1706453 (Comments: 3) | JumpStart International (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! You used dispensing=nob on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/432278230/history Have you maybe meant dispensing=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-25 22:59:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 183716872 (Comments: 1) | Danalieth73 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! You used network:type=node_networ on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1229199425/history Have you maybe meant network:type=node_network ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replac... commented 2026-09-25 22:58:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 167045933 (Comments: 2) | Susi69 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Map_HeRo, vielen Dank für die Hinweise. Grab Dörsch habe ich historic=grave geändert. Hexenverfolgung habe ich entsprechend bezeichnet und Quellen ergänzt. Die Bezeichnung Mühlgraben habe ich entfernt, der Wasser... commented 2026-09-25 22:47:43 UTC by Susi69 ♦2 |
| 189368154 (Comments: 7) | kmenard (Discussed changesets: 4) | seems to have been fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189564226 commented 2026-09-25 22:44:40 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 142247894 (Comments: 1) | zfish118 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213692963/history has building:flats = 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E,1F,1G,H that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended t... commented 2026-09-25 22:33:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 169211688 (Comments: 1) | alexandra_07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160262958/history has building:levels = S+P+2E+Ma that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-25 22:29:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 181657980 (Comments: 1) | kzmrzzg (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used locked=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13751893169/history Have you maybe meant locked=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-25 22:26:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188019172 (Comments: 1) | circle61815971 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used kerb=non on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14124011930/history Have you maybe meant kerb=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where... commented 2026-09-25 22:25:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 173245368 (Comments: 1) | Mike Moresi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882625262/history has building:flats = 37-42 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to express addresse... commented 2026-09-25 22:25:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 180323095 (Comments: 1) | mama we (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! You used leaf_cycle=mixed;deciduous on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20367343/history Have you maybe meant leaf_cycle=mixed ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it ... commented 2026-09-25 22:25:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178253345 (Comments: 1) | Relics (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used leaf_cycle=mixed;deciduous on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20188870/history Have you maybe meant leaf_cycle=mixed ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it ... commented 2026-09-25 22:23:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 138204690 (Comments: 2) | rivermont (Discussed changesets: 69) | A typo indeed! It has been fixed. Thanks commented 2026-09-25 22:22:18 UTC by rivermont ♦243 |
| 175550422 (Comments: 2) | Marc Mongenet (Discussed changesets: 25) | Fixed. commented 2026-09-25 22:19:03 UTC by Marc Mongenet ♦34 |
| 189420381 (Comments: 1) | rogerscgreg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. What's here now? A vacant storefront, or something new? commented 2026-09-25 22:14:51 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 183979431 (Comments: 1) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 983) | Hello! You used tunnel=culver on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34107906/history Have you maybe meant tunnel=culvert ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-09-25 22:14:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189336644 (Comments: 2) | NikWd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like all of the problems with this changeset have been cleaned up by that partial revert. Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2026-09-25 22:13:07 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189430445 (Comments: 1) | noone2301 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! In OpenStreetMap, we expand abbreviations, so we write "Street" instead of "St", "Northeast" instead of "NE", etc. This is because it's easier to automatically abbreviate names... commented 2026-09-25 22:07:56 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189555539 (Comments: 3) | Da_Steff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Steff, Because your first edit ever was in the Netherlands. 😀 I have no cristall bowl for your next contribution. I 'm part of the Dutch community and we welcome new mappers. Enjoy mapping, eggie commented 2026-09-25 22:00:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 187717409 (Comments: 3) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yes, I used the USGS Topographic maps when creating those ways initially. Sometimes you can combine that with aerial imagery - there's often a slight color change at the thalweg (different levels of turbidity where there's deeper water flow... commented 2026-09-25 21:57:45 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦47 |
| 189554109 (Comments: 1) | Draykill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map! This is a very good start for mapping a waste centre and even having a named building on the map will help people to find the place. I've ended up making a few changes inclu... commented 2026-09-25 21:57:08 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189562908 (Comments: 1) | Karla Canales (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Por favor dibujar lo que ve en el satelite. Además, puede cuadrar las estructuras con la letra Q salu2 commented 2026-09-25 21:54:30 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189549161 (Comments: 1) | Nüsschen (Discussed changesets: 36) | Nice! Spielplatzmapping! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189549161 commented 2026-09-25 21:53:28 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189560446 (Comments: 1) | okwithmydecay (Discussed changesets: 41) | I accidentally entered the wrong description for this edit, it should have been: "Align benches with imagery and add openbenches:id" commented 2026-09-25 21:53:14 UTC by okwithmydecay ♦43 |
| 173161686 (Comments: 6) | Cello_Bello (Discussed changesets: 2) | @Cello_Bello Hello, Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. As suggested above, please do join the discussion in the forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/10 . commented 2026-09-25 21:41:03 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,881 |
| 189510257 (Comments: 3) | Fannar82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, es wird generell der "Normalzustand" in osm erfasst, temporäre Sperrungen bleiben außen vor. Als grobe Richtlinie gelten 3 Monate für die Eintragung von Zugangswerten. Ist das zeitliche Ausmaß einer tempo... commented 2026-09-25 21:40:01 UTC by limes11 ♦1,106 |
| 85202605 (Comments: 1) | M100g200 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used sport=moto on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587142332/history Have you maybe meant sport=motor ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-25 21:36:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 104128119 (Comments: 2) | MonsieurF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used sport=moto on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32693149/history Have you maybe meant sport=motor ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-25 21:36:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 130116669 (Comments: 1) | BREYSSE JM (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! You used sport=moto on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32693132/history Have you maybe meant sport=motor ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-25 21:36:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 168463562 (Comments: 1) | mycota (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! You used crossing:island=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366712693/history Have you maybe meant crossing:island=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-09-25 21:36:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 37324294 (Comments: 1) | Marcussacapuces91 - Cadastre (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250765330 what was meant by crop=protein ? protein is not a crop commented 2026-09-25 21:33:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 69586363 (Comments: 1) | rojitha (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686009730/history what crop=ofc means? commented 2026-09-25 21:31:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188695342 (Comments: 2) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 14) | That node fixed. I occasionally see "pole" used on busbar structures (placed by others) though they're really not on poles per se. commented 2026-09-25 21:30:00 UTC by Mr Matt K ♦7 |
| 189562696 (Comments: 1) | Anupa K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverting this changeset, from what I can see on the Bing Aerial imagery here these buildings appear disconnected from one another so joining them like this is incorrect. The building that you moved also seemed correctly aligned using the OSMUK cadas... commented 2026-09-25 21:21:51 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189419922 (Comments: 1) | togglefog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, das ist in dieser Form keine richtige Adresse. Würdest du das bitte korrigieren und den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5533861 schließen? Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-25 21:13:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 188781512 (Comments: 3) | Cello_Bello (Discussed changesets: 2) | See my question addressed to you in this post: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/11 commented 2026-09-25 21:05:33 UTC by Glyphe ♦18 |
| 189354418 (Comments: 4) | MooiTassTee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, habe schon alles angepasst, kein Problem. Ob das in StreetComplete angepasst würde... Ist eben ein sehr exotisches Thema, auch international. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-25 21:00:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 174759904 (Comments: 1) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 122) | Dalej w budowie? commented 2026-09-25 20:59:11 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦944 |
| 189417682 (Comments: 3) | OSM-FFL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, das hier sind die auf Straßen: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A3000%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Langenthal%22%5D%3B%0Away%5Bhighway%5D%28area%29%20-%3E%20.highways%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydra... commented 2026-09-25 20:57:51 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 189530687 (Comments: 7) | Coen Wagemakers (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dank voor de link eggie, ik zal deze bekijken. commented 2026-09-25 20:49:22 UTC by Coen Wagemakers ♦1 |
| 179603102 (Comments: 8) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 75) | "private", nicht schon wieder "destination" *facepalm2* (Wäre auch schön, wenn man Kommentare nachträglich bearbeiten könnte...) commented 2026-09-25 20:49:00 UTC by LingM ♦19 |
| 189562440 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 418) | Commentaar moest zijn weg doorgetrokken naar nieuw pand commented 2026-09-25 20:47:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189392261 (Comments: 1) | WANTES (Discussed changesets: 12) | Не понятно, почему вы удалили тропу с восточного плеча Ачишхо на юго-восток, если она там есть и мы по ней регулярно ходим commented 2026-09-25 20:45:30 UTC by Andrei Lazarev ♦10 |
| 189124341 (Comments: 4) | atticquilt (Discussed changesets: 9) | You too, wow! commented 2026-09-25 20:39:14 UTC by atticquilt ♦13 |
| 181569412 (Comments: 3) | Entbert (Discussed changesets: 12) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 165228747 (Comments: 3) | Zunyu (Discussed changesets: 2) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188097763 (Comments: 3) | -Utiashvili (Discussed changesets: 7) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 138211223 (Comments: 3) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 183) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 155243592 (Comments: 3) | dknelson9876 (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178208514 (Comments: 3) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188051340 (Comments: 4) | ptaff (Discussed changesets: 6) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187377458 (Comments: 3) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 207) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178647548 (Comments: 3) | VLD319 (Discussed changesets: 15) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 168575788 (Comments: 3) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 156) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178296828 (Comments: 3) | xrt (Discussed changesets: 66) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 173660291 (Comments: 3) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 27) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 28234252 (Comments: 3) | Linie29 (Discussed changesets: 92) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 179043354 (Comments: 5) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 88) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:36:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 180972436 (Comments: 3) | Jarek 🚲 (Discussed changesets: 128) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:36:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 185703497 (Comments: 3) | wolfgang8 (Discussed changesets: 24) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:36:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 173112786 (Comments: 3) | Map_HeRo (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. And thanks for your activity in general! commented 2026-09-25 20:36:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189554668 (Comments: 1) | Mityaboxer (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189562037 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 124) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189554668, 189555052, 189555071, 189557391, 189557466. commented 2026-09-25 20:31:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189555052 (Comments: 1) | Dimakishenko12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189557391 (Comments: 1) | MityastrongBoxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189555071 (Comments: 1) | Dimakishenko12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189557466 (Comments: 1) | MityastrongBoxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 155936503 (Comments: 1) | NoelB (Discussed changesets: 42) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12144573779/history line_attachment=w ? What it is expressing? See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2x4K commented 2026-09-25 20:27:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 163023987 (Comments: 1) | Merkades Vito (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12623837953/history - is this very unusual use of line_attachment tag deliberate? maybe it was supposed to go into other tag? see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:line attachment commented 2026-09-25 20:26:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187573256 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 324) | Vysvetli mi prosím ťa dôvod zmazania adresy z tejto amenity. commented 2026-09-25 20:24:17 UTC by jansokoly ♦4 |
| 188958158 (Comments: 2) | Mehmet Bey (Discussed changesets: 12) | Merhaba @marmara_editor . Mehmet Bey adlı bu katkıcının katkılarının çok büyük bir bölümü Türkiye'de kaymakamlık, valilik lojmanlarından oluşuyor. Genelde lojmanları ekliyor ve lojmanların &cc... commented 2026-09-25 20:11:44 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦281 |
| 189553088 (Comments: 2) | arvan3844 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, danke für die Hinweise. Ich habe die Änderungen entsprechend der Vorschläge erneut geändert. Habe nicht auf die Eigenschaften geachtet. Der POI ist wieder da wo er hin gehört, das war in der Tat ein Versehen. commented 2026-09-25 20:06:13 UTC by arvan3844 ♦1 |
| 188607707 (Comments: 1) | Albert radley (Discussed changesets: 16) | This new road hasn’t been built yet but is due to be completed by Feb 2027 commented 2026-09-25 19:52:46 UTC by Joshua_Brighton ♦1 |
| 188388222 (Comments: 1) | rochirochi (Discussed changesets: 19) | Where this import was discussed? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines commented 2026-09-25 19:46:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 144129131 (Comments: 1) | biketeur (Discussed changesets: 22) | what offset_pent_roof means? It seems not documented at OSM wiki and it is quite unclear... commented 2026-09-25 19:42:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189560136 (Comments: 1) | DennisW5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dennis, De info staat op de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-25 19:41:42 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189560100 (Comments: 2) | DennisW5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. commented 2026-09-25 19:41:03 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 182231551 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM9 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Здравствуйте, спасибо за комментарий, удалила некорректный адрес. commented 2026-09-25 19:36:32 UTC by Ozon OSM9 ♦8 |
| 189545999 (Comments: 3) | PacifyUwU (Discussed changesets: 11) | Should be fixed now, thank commented 2026-09-25 19:36:24 UTC by PacifyUwU ♦5 |
| 189559987 (Comments: 1) | DennisW5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-25 19:34:27 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189558928 (Comments: 1) | maruverse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-25 19:32:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189512121 (Comments: 1) | Skyeward (Discussed changesets: 1) | On the building you tagged as name=Saint Francis Hospital, I don't think this is correct. That's the name of the campus the building is on, but the building itself has multiple names for each tower. --- #REVIE... commented 2026-09-25 19:30:56 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189558226 (Comments: 1) | jel5464 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-25 19:30:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 188274385 (Comments: 3) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for being so receptive! It's refreshing. I should say, I do like the work you're doing to add landuse and natural area on the map. Keep it up. commented 2026-09-25 19:30:00 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦47 |
| 189510778 (Comments: 1) | grphx (Discussed changesets: 2) | camera:type=destroyed would be invalid anyway (just remove the camera). Fixed would mean it doesn't turn. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189510778 |
| 179001694 (Comments: 1) | Flsh_mcqnn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used power=substatio on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13596183254/history Have you maybe meant power=substation ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-09-25 19:27:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 145414178 (Comments: 1) | fkg - world (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296798901/history has building:levels = 3 + Dachgeschoss that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-25 19:26:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189478700 (Comments: 2) | GabiRen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Habi Ich freue mich, dass tatsächlich jemand Änderungen kontrolliert - nur so werden die Karten wirklich brauchbar. Danke! Wenn du stärker einzoomst, siehst du, dass die erste Box an der Wand eines Gebäudes ist (We... commented 2026-09-25 19:25:33 UTC by GabiRen ♦1 |
| 189160885 (Comments: 1) | SamiraHeumaier (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, um was für einen Wanderweg handelt es sich denn? Ist der Weg ausgeschildert? Ich musste deine Einträge leider erstmal rückgängig machen, da wir Wanderwege in OpenStreetMap anders eintragen. Ist leider etwas komplizie... commented 2026-09-25 19:20:14 UTC by cuzi ♦190 |
| 189555864 (Comments: 1) | bullethimself (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edits in Bulgaria! Please use MAF Orthophoto for future edits. Bing (and most other global providers) are usually outdated and of lower quality. Happy mapping, Dimitar commented 2026-09-25 19:10:36 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,039 |
| 164451499 (Comments: 1) | TJ Clark (Discussed changesets: 2) | ALPR no longer present commented 2026-09-25 19:08:23 UTC by TJ Clark ♦2 |
| 181138601 (Comments: 3) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 38) | Das Konzept ist mir bekannt. Allerdings habe ich Zweifel, ob es hier bezüglich der Fußgängerampeln richtig umgesetzt ist. Hier ist ein Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13720471509 . Diese Fußgängerampel ist ansc... commented 2026-09-25 19:07:41 UTC by Biff ♦27 |
| 189369301 (Comments: 1) | dolph13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was this name change made by the local authorities? Is there an official website where I can read about the new name? Thanks! commented 2026-09-25 19:07:33 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189507364 (Comments: 1) | Eliaz_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Que es C62G+9H? saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189507364 commented 2026-09-25 18:51:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189509217 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hoi, Lastig soms. Wanneer het niet duidelijk is dan is het een highway=path en dat routeert ook voor fietsers. Het ligt een beetje aan de bebording. Die paden met Houd rekening met elkaar hebben van oorsprong vaak toch een bord fietspad.... commented 2026-09-25 18:45:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 187516604 (Comments: 4) | JuanCarlos80 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Ab der Kreuzung zur Lemgoer Straße gilt das Verbot auf jeden Fall nicht mehr, also genau das was als primary B66 in OSM markiert ist. Von der Kreuzung Lemgoer Straße Richtung Selbeck gibt es auch kein Verbot. sieht man auch hier : http... commented 2026-09-25 18:39:56 UTC by removed_user ♦10 |
| 189513449 (Comments: 1) | Eliaz_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. No funcionan así los tags que manipuló. Seentiende lo que intentó hacer, pero va a tener que ser corregido entero. por favor consultar en el chat de la comunidad si acaso tiene dudas... --- |
| 189553040 (Comments: 1) | Cayenne17 (Discussed changesets: 6) | J'ai un petit bug/problème avec JOSM. ça a gardé le même changeset #189553040 et ça remplace par le dernier commentaire. commented 2026-09-25 18:29:00 UTC by Cayenne17 ♦50 |
| 189007692 (Comments: 3) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 524) | That' nice and dandy, but you should update your tool in such a way that you do *not* leave empty key-value pairs in OpenStreetMap. And also don't just remove `disused:amenity=bank` and add `opening_hours`. If the bank is really open it&... commented 2026-09-25 18:27:17 UTC by habi ♦2,268 |
| 189545500 (Comments: 1) | Timmetje (Discussed changesets: 1) | review_requested \tyes Dag Rim, Je kunt een extra tag toevoegen service=driveway MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-25 18:24:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189553957 (Comments: 3) | Karellw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Op de archimedus laan staan al toegangstags access:conditional\tprivate @ (Mo-Fr 00:00-06:00, 22:00-00:00; Sa, Su) commented 2026-09-25 18:20:20 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189554547 (Comments: 1) | mopl04n2c (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag mop... Die adressen zijn er gewoon al. Soms liggen ze op elkaar of is er een bedrijf op getagd. Ik heb het adres hersteld. FEBO heb ik samengevpegd met de bestaande adresnode. CoMaps android is geen ideale tool. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-25 18:18:12 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 186896803 (Comments: 2) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 38) | Vielen Dank für diesen Hinweis. commented 2026-09-25 18:14:46 UTC by vanagaudi ♦48 |
| 189551535 (Comments: 1) | Hepos (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Hepos, sind die ganzen Zugangswege hier wirklich Betonflächen ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-09-25 18:10:17 UTC by Zrop ♦169 |
| 189550977 (Comments: 1) | Hepos (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Hepos, ist hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31149375 der linke Gehweg wirklich mittlerweile gepflastert ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-09-25 18:09:12 UTC by Zrop ♦169 |
| 189544995 (Comments: 1) | Kharandesert (Discussed changesets: 3) | Olá! Vi sua atualização nas marginais da Avenida Honorato Viana (trecho UPAE/HGU) e também na Avenida Sete de Setembro, e entendi seu critério de classificá-las como highway=secondary. Faz todo sentido para r... commented 2026-09-25 18:07:46 UTC by Josemar Bezerra Junior ♦3 |
| 189027393 (Comments: 1) | Levanter66 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Levanter66! Thanks for your edits to OSM! Can you describe why you deleted way/1553318210? It's often best to leave ways with `abandoned:highway` tags, so others don't re-add them. Learn more: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-09-25 18:07:00 UTC by uppermethow ♦4 |
| 189548366 (Comments: 3) | Lord_Gaav (Discussed changesets: 1) | Top! commented 2026-09-25 17:52:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189553829 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:28 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189551244 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:21 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189556320 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:05 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 145636315 (Comments: 1) | InfosReseaux (Discussed changesets: 28) | Les numéros de ces pylônes sont-ils corrects ? Par exemple, le n°6 est pourtant le septième depuis le poste de Marmagne, à moins que le premier ne soit pas numéroté ? Est-ce un erreur de comptage ou... commented 2026-09-25 17:44:03 UTC by Styvooo ♦2 |
| 189554973 (Comments: 1) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 113) | Nutze das Tiris Overlay ;-) commented 2026-09-25 17:30:41 UTC by M_Gaugg ♦50 |
| 189517469 (Comments: 3) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 113) | Danke dir, schöne Grüße commented 2026-09-25 17:29:59 UTC by M_Gaugg ♦50 |
| 148837910 (Comments: 1) | Plumf (Discussed changesets: 422) | Hello! You used parking:left=lan on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754322806/history Have you maybe meant parking:left=lane ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-25 17:26:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188482074 (Comments: 3) | Jack_expl0res (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the explanation! The best is to split the road into two parallel ones - one marked as ford, the other as bridge. Both can get their appropriate access tags, and the bridge can have a 'width' tag describing how wide it is. ... commented 2026-09-25 17:25:27 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 146362209 (Comments: 1) | Oos1812 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091804387/history has building:levels = 0.75 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 17:25:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189530217 (Comments: 1) | cuisinella claira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Vous avez déplacé votre magasin sur le parking, je l'ai remis sur la bâtiment, mais proche de l'entrée pour garder l'idée de votre changement commented 2026-09-25 17:13:57 UTC by LySioS ♦157 |
| 170348524 (Comments: 2) | jemily1 (Discussed changesets: 43) | fixed commented 2026-09-25 17:13:26 UTC by jemily1 ♦66 |
| 189409236 (Comments: 6) | ONEMISSLE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wir können auch gerne meine Änderung Rückgängig machen lassen, wenn es da Unklarheiten gibt. Soweit ich weiß, kann ich das aber wegen der Vandalismus Sache nicht selbst machen. Kann mir da jemand sagen, wie das genau geht? commented 2026-09-25 17:10:13 UTC by ONEMISSLE ♦1 |
| 189136183 (Comments: 2) | stutterdirectly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Must've been by mistake, sorry commented 2026-09-25 17:09:00 UTC by stutterdirectly ♦1 |
| 142840546 (Comments: 2) | ansuta (Discussed changesets: 15) | You're right, changed. commented 2026-09-25 17:02:21 UTC by ansuta ♦14 |
| 189171338 (Comments: 1) | GeoSafe-Moshe_Import (Discussed changesets: 1) | These should be refs, not names, and probably also mapped as route relations as network=US:OK:Garvin --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189171338 commented 2026-09-25 17:01:47 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 155815079 (Comments: 2) | noncandeggiare (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes most definitely a typo! The building is basically a big roof with no side walls on top of a pool where people used to wash clothes by hand until 30 years a go. Thanks for noticing. commented 2026-09-25 17:01:24 UTC by noncandeggiare ♦1 |
| 189132823 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks like it is one-way but the opposite direction it was originally mapped. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189132823 commented 2026-09-25 16:57:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189553939 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 478) | The name was added a couple of months ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153230909 by a new user in one of their only 3 changesets. I've walked quite a lot of this and in no cases can I think of any that "Beacons Way" is t... commented 2026-09-25 16:53:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,881 |
| 188319949 (Comments: 3) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes I see that, good point, go ahead and change it. commented 2026-09-25 16:52:38 UTC by Killian Bath ♦1 |
| 189088005 (Comments: 1) | ArgyleZombie (Discussed changesets: 16) | Pretty sure these are county road numbers, not names. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189088005 commented 2026-09-25 16:48:57 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188676981 (Comments: 1) | skorasaurus (Discussed changesets: 20) | just to note, yes, it's odd that the lots size are inconsistent sizes, but that's what exists. commented 2026-09-25 16:47:30 UTC by skorasaurus ♦225 |
 | 98729559 (Comments: 1) | nordnorge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used cuisine=sandwich;pastry;sou on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3050973645/history Have you maybe meant cuisine=sandwich;pastry;soup ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just ... commented 2026-09-25 16:45:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 154939822 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 446) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106121053/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-25 16:44:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 154884693 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 446) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640085989/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-25 16:44:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 154631661 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 446) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97825648/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-09-25 16:43:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 153668171 (Comments: 1) | PurpleLuckyCat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608499561/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-25 16:43:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 173044303 (Comments: 1) | maxxdan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! You used sport=moto on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13204650420/history Have you maybe meant sport=motor ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects... commented 2026-09-25 16:43:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 177242074 (Comments: 1) | Shahmi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467182532/history has building:levels = 0.75 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 16:42:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 64231295 (Comments: 1) | DHP11 MDS (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641577319/history has building:levels = 0.75 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 16:42:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189065213 (Comments: 1) | visitingangels (Discussed changesets: 5) | Opening hours applies to when the location is physically open, not when the website is. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189065213 commented 2026-09-25 16:37:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 181987223 (Comments: 1) | Hukeish2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Es macht wenig Sinn, bei einer Relation nur die Tags zu entfernen. Willst du damit sagen, die Abbiegebeschränkung existiert nicht mehr? commented 2026-09-25 16:34:02 UTC by Discostu36 ♦221 |
| 188988521 (Comments: 1) | HeadHunter7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This optometrist got added in a drainage ditch equally distant from multiple buildings. Could you position this at the correct spot, please? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2026-09-25 16:32:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 47553785 (Comments: 2) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | Well, that’s sat there for almost a decade with no one catching it… Yes, it is gravel. Not driving over graves! commented 2026-09-25 16:31:15 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 186786452 (Comments: 6) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Boa tarde! Enviei a notificação sobre o radar em questão. A cidade possui alguns radares estáticos como esse e também possui diversos radares acoplados em semáforos (Exp.: Rua São Paulo com Rua Par... commented 2026-09-25 16:26:48 UTC by James Liber ♦5 |
| 189423771 (Comments: 4) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 54) | Thanks commented 2026-09-25 16:24:14 UTC by empty_child ♦406 |
| 188976562 (Comments: 2) | Taktaal (Discussed changesets: 42) | Das war glaube ich eine der Treppen wo jemand jede Stufe einzeln eingetragen hat und dann war das Tagging auch irgendwie falsch so dass ich das während der Korrektur kombiniert habe. commented 2026-09-25 16:19:09 UTC by Taktaal ♦64 |
| 175028429 (Comments: 1) | Umut Arda Ararat (Discussed changesets: 3) | 4511663 numaralı notta (https://osm.org/note/4511663) bu güzergâhta artık feribot seferlerinin yapılmadığı belirtiliyor. Siz yeni bir feribot eklediğiniz için (https://osm.org/way/1453097311/), sanırım bu not artık ge&cced... commented 2026-09-25 16:15:53 UTC by Hypsometric ♦75 |
 | 180298254 (Comments: 2) | Catjacket (Discussed changesets: 6) | I was there and saw the trees growing in between the ties, commented 2026-09-25 16:14:59 UTC by Catjacket ♦2 |
| 158804588 (Comments: 3) | Flight777 (Discussed changesets: 25) | whops, sorry commented 2026-09-25 16:09:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189499774 (Comments: 2) | Sander H (Discussed changesets: 95) | Het is vooralsnog een schatting van waar ze ongeveer zullen moeten komen. Kan niet heel veel anders zijn zonder de beide af/opritten voor en na de brug een jaren kwijt te zijn. Zal over een paar weken wel duidelijker worden en dan zal ik het wel bijw... commented 2026-09-25 16:08:18 UTC by Sander H ♦92 |
| 140999391 (Comments: 2) | Руслан Т (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi! =) Thanks for spotting this, my mistake, I used the wrong tag. Since this is a flat number range, it should be addr:flats=270-309. building:flats is meant for the building itself, as the total number of flats. I'll fix it. commented 2026-09-25 16:06:06 UTC by Руслан Т ♦58 |
| 189529555 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 123) | It has! I did announce on the forum a while back, but jump in, there's still plenty that needs fixing commented 2026-09-25 16:05:49 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 187663513 (Comments: 1) | ContraBand (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539025 ? commented 2026-09-25 16:04:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189246082 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | If referring to node/1699888987 , then "generic taxi stand". Re wiki "undesignated taxi stand". commented 2026-09-25 16:03:09 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 144661193 (Comments: 1) | tx94 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539023 ? commented 2026-09-25 16:01:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 179244301 (Comments: 1) | Bzyzz (Discussed changesets: 3) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539020 ? commented 2026-09-25 16:00:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 144591116 (Comments: 1) | Jtapia92 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090844311/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-25 16:00:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 158722549 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 150) | Hello! You used royal_cypher=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12310638822/history Have you maybe meant royal_cypher=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2026-09-25 15:58:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189540108 (Comments: 2) | nordiq_jve (Discussed changesets: 5) | @osmviborg Jeg har forenklet lidt og lagt turn restrictions ind. Hvis du mener at det kræver mere forenkling er du velkommen:-) commented 2026-09-25 15:58:30 UTC by nordiq_jve ♦5 |
| 156191951 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 150) | Hello! You used royal_cypher=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12155608718/history Have you maybe meant royal_cypher=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2026-09-25 15:58:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 158027825 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 150) | Hello! You used royal_cypher=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12259640350/history Have you maybe meant royal_cypher=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2026-09-25 15:58:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187791392 (Comments: 1) | adejot (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887555028/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 169280395 (Comments: 1) | byskov95 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416328940/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 157175819 (Comments: 1) | blaukorn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487086470/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 161940778 (Comments: 1) | OMME-OSM (Discussed changesets: 76) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/660921527/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 83164240 (Comments: 1) | complete_gth (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372579937/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 135251300 (Comments: 1) | Fousss (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087327056/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 166846725 (Comments: 1) | merylstreet (Discussed changesets: 21) | why the fix me etiquete? commented 2026-09-25 15:53:40 UTC by Mixch043 ♦1 |
| 179819586 (Comments: 13) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 145) | Looks like the mapper is back adding these links, albeit manually and only additions on two shelters so far. It might be good to discuss if we want to have these website links. Given that the website is not official in any capacity and looks to in... commented 2026-09-25 15:40:19 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦33 |
| 170704298 (Comments: 2) | Tom Ameye (Discussed changesets: 118) | Ja dat was op basis van de officiële Natura 2000 webpagina over de Wolfsputten, een boscomplex dat deel uitmaakt van het gebied BE2400009. Het is inderdaad mogelijks een dubbel met relation/7709586. Dan komt de vraag op wat de basis is voor r... commented 2026-09-25 15:31:18 UTC by Tom Ameye ♦71 |
| 171637525 (Comments: 3) | de24000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | man_made=foundation may be used to mark such case and distinguish it from completely destroyed ones commented 2026-09-25 15:23:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188698443 (Comments: 1) | FlockOffTulsa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Unlikely location (blocking sidewalk, please improve). --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188698443 commented 2026-09-25 15:20:51 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189545499 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 188) | И за пореден път EveryDoor прикачва колчета/блокове(в случая) към път. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14214315774/ commented 2026-09-25 15:10:20 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 188599430 (Comments: 1) | ktr-osm (Discussed changesets: 3) | This building levitates? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188599430 commented 2026-09-25 15:00:34 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189185333 (Comments: 2) | a_n_w (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think the end of Honeywell has re-opened, I'll have to check exactly what form. That said, I'm not convinced the south end of Brook Lane is open because that's now the boundary of Northern Roots so might be fenced. Needs scouting out... commented 2026-09-25 14:58:14 UTC by a_n_w ♦2 |
| 189492397 (Comments: 2) | Quinip (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, des de l'app de DeFlock, estàs obligat a fixar un "perfil" a l'hora de registrar una càmera de seguretat, les opcions que et permet són les següents: - Flock - Motorola - Genetec - Leon... commented 2026-09-25 14:44:15 UTC by Quinip ♦2 |
| 189495567 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 25) | siehe https://osm.org/note/4708815 commented 2026-09-25 14:44:01 UTC by flo2154 ♦71 |
| 189538954 (Comments: 2) | mtmail (Discussed changesets: 56) | Siehe auch hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maproulette-challenge-andert-aldi-zu-aldi-konsens/147653 commented 2026-09-25 14:37:25 UTC by surveyor54 ♦692 |
| 189537017 (Comments: 8) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks, I'll take another look at it tonight Rhys commented 2026-09-25 14:36:50 UTC by RLlE ♦4 |
| 147887251 (Comments: 1) | Ipintza (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51046602/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-25 14:28:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188565929 (Comments: 1) | Nordseeküstenradweg (Discussed changesets: 26) | Based on the description here https://www.rodekruis.be/afdeling/lauwe-menen-rekkem/wat-doen-we/, would you really say this is a disaster_response object? commented 2026-09-25 14:27:33 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,558 |
 | 124797334 (Comments: 1) | JLOSM (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311312183/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-25 14:27:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 13451605 (Comments: 1) | przemas75 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used playground=spring on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1958109538/history Have you maybe meant playground=springy ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited... commented 2026-09-25 14:27:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 30829045 (Comments: 1) | ihamr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343124425/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 157417105 (Comments: 1) | KINGDM76 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319885443/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 176072931 (Comments: 1) | NK-Mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459431188/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 150086034 (Comments: 1) | cmitchell (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273087930/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188540596 (Comments: 1) | AtlasVoyager (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are these really "anybody can park here" or are these "customer parking only"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188540596 commented 2026-09-25 14:26:37 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 137834241 (Comments: 1) | René Willershausen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185280203/history has building:levels = 1,5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189525266 (Comments: 5) | ngocthienvtii (Discussed changesets: 1) | chứ cứ thêm đường không đúng thực tế thế này thì sai hết commented 2026-09-25 14:22:59 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦57 |
| 186743413 (Comments: 1) | Lê Tuấn Minh (Discussed changesets: 27) | Nếu bạn tạo restriction thì cần thêm 'from', 'via', 'to' vào mục 'role' của đường tương ứng nhé. Nếu bạn chỉ thêm đường vào một restrictio... commented 2026-09-25 14:14:16 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦57 |
| 189535397 (Comments: 5) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oki diolch am eich gwyboddaeth lleol, dwi'n deall. Felly, os ydych chi neu'r weithwyr fferm angen access i'r safle (ac y ffordd), mae'n safle a ffordd preifat, felly `access=private`. Mae'n jyst eitaf "nitpicky&qu... commented 2026-09-25 14:07:22 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦11 |
| 188473534 (Comments: 1) | jeffmartin1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | So if I came to this location at 3 on a holiday Sunday morning, you'd be open for business? If not, then opening_hours=24/7 is not correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2026-09-25 14:06:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188470872 (Comments: 2) | AaronFTD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like the florist tags were also missed. I updated this location. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188470872 commented 2026-09-25 14:05:20 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188429617 (Comments: 1) | crfdude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this someone's private farm access or is everyone legally prohibited from using this? access=no is relatively uncommon compared to access=private. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2026-09-25 14:01:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188320590 (Comments: 2) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Curious if you got a chance to see this or not? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188320590 commented 2026-09-25 13:59:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189222205 (Comments: 1) | kzmrzzg (Discussed changesets: 22) | Cześć, to CPR, czy DDR z dopuszczeniem ruchu pieszych? Jeśli CPR to powinno być highway=path https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w commented 2026-09-25 13:58:18 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,488 |
| 189338070 (Comments: 4) | einufo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Peter, danke für die Tipps. Habe amenity gelassen, steht so im wiki. description zu note geändert, not:emergency ergänzt und bei den anderen Tags emergency weggelassen. commented 2026-09-25 13:55:39 UTC by einufo ♦15 |
| 189401800 (Comments: 3) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 37) | Happy to help. I tend to focus on places I have visited. I'm always looking for places where cycle paths are shown as unsurfaced when actually they are surfaced as this has a massive impact on cycle routing software. I must check out mapillar... commented 2026-09-25 13:53:18 UTC by Adam Edwards ♦27 |
| 175369816 (Comments: 2) | SimonHarms (Discussed changesets: 8) | you are correct commented 2026-09-25 13:52:28 UTC by SimonHarms ♦11 |
| 189419161 (Comments: 1) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 37) | I've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561436762 to the local NCN1 and EV12 relations. commented 2026-09-25 13:50:57 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦505 |
| 189351911 (Comments: 1) | WECATransOps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map. This kind of detail is very much needed. Can't find any imagery to confirm these changes as the newest Mapillary images in august still show construction here. Unfortunately in this chang... commented 2026-09-25 13:49:47 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
 | 70723541 (Comments: 1) | teeraporn deejai (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693170102/history has building:levels = [hk that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-25 13:49:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 148035279 (Comments: 1) | Guthrie (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254958389/history has building:flats = 1911, 1912, 1913, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected he... commented 2026-09-25 13:48:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 13440983 (Comments: 1) | przemas75 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used playground=spring on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1956641086/history Have you maybe meant playground=springy ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited... commented 2026-09-25 13:44:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 13036063 (Comments: 1) | przemas75 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used playground=spring on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1905836316/history Have you maybe meant playground=springy ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited... commented 2026-09-25 13:44:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 17191527 (Comments: 1) | alessioz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used playground=spring on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2405075083/history Have you maybe meant playground=springy ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited... commented 2026-09-25 13:44:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 109683727 (Comments: 1) | bhoudusse2463 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used playground=spring on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9007201748/history Have you maybe meant playground=springy ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited... commented 2026-09-25 13:44:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189529917 (Comments: 2) | jihan zalza (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I've sent her a private message, hopefully she will read it. Could we request that all of her building edits be reverted? commented 2026-09-25 13:44:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 162840296 (Comments: 1) | claudia10 (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello! You used artwork_type=sculptur on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2334597422/history Have you maybe meant artwork_type=sculpture ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (... commented 2026-09-25 13:43:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 156780661 (Comments: 1) | Silva1989 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! You used water=pon on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378130680/history Have you maybe meant water=pond ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wher... commented 2026-09-25 13:43:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189529904 (Comments: 1) | jihan zalza (Discussed changesets: 2) | Halo, mohon ikuti dahulu tutorial iD editornya ya hingga selesai commented 2026-09-25 13:41:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189526817 (Comments: 1) | palasah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Selamat datang di OpenStreetMap! Mohon cek pesan pribadi dari saya ya commented 2026-09-25 13:39:03 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189508933 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 45) | Change looks good from what I can see! Ty for contributing to the map! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189508933 commented 2026-09-25 13:38:15 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189531065 (Comments: 1) | arintoko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lain kali di pengaturan aplikasi OrganicMaps pakai bahasa Indonesia. Label yang dimasukkan itu kurang tepat; Kopdes itu bukan supermarket commented 2026-09-25 13:37:17 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189514236 (Comments: 1) | Watchman8210 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! I've made some changes based on the comment you left in this changeset, you can see the changes I have made here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189545442 Please le... commented 2026-09-25 13:36:59 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 186179543 (Comments: 10) | Chandra Sekhar Csk Kilari (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, https://www.upwork.com/freelance-jobs/openstreetmap/ https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/openstreetmap-foundation-jobs-worldwide?position=1&pageNum=0 commented 2026-09-25 13:36:29 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,381 |
| 176874993 (Comments: 1) | vogelfreier (Discussed changesets: 109) | The Bing maps aerial imagery used in this changeset for the skate park is out of date and surroundings, ESRI (used in the previous version) shows the correct outline commented 2026-09-25 13:33:41 UTC by An Kerdher ♦2 |
| 189535056 (Comments: 1) | almahera (Discussed changesets: 1) | apcb? udah bener itu taman commented 2026-09-25 13:33:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189535908 (Comments: 3) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | There is a cut feature in the editor to split areas. commented 2026-09-25 13:27:47 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189496161 (Comments: 1) | okilimu (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hallo okilimu, bist Du Dir sicher mit conveying=forward statt conveying=reversible? commented 2026-09-25 13:27:08 UTC by MrAnderson ♦12 |
| 189533113 (Comments: 3) | FSC73 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Snap ik, daarom staat de weg ook op construction. Gezien hier nog niet aan gebouwd wordt heb ik deze omgezet naar proposed. Bouwwegen heb ik toegevoegd als track en een service road naar de parkeerplaats. Ik snap dat het handig is als het een ... commented 2026-09-25 13:26:21 UTC by DwarfNebula_ ♦73 |
| 189492004 (Comments: 2) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hey! Estem començant amb tot aquest tema. Hem trobat el fabricant corresponent i ho corretgim. Gràcies! commented 2026-09-25 13:25:59 UTC by L'Henin ♦1 |
| 189414483 (Comments: 2) | Robotnikmajowy (Discussed changesets: 126) | Jakie jest źródło tej obwodnicy ostrowa? commented 2026-09-25 13:24:24 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,488 |
| 189535702 (Comments: 3) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | My change is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189543187 commented 2026-09-25 13:20:19 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189482980 (Comments: 1) | krzysiuup (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561918540 Cześć, czym jest ta linia? Jeśli to CPRt, o powinno być tagowane jako highway=path + segregated=* jeśli to chodnik, to te tagi bicycle/foot nie powinny się tam znaleźć. Tutaj więc... commented 2026-09-25 13:15:51 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,488 |
| 189518866 (Comments: 5) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 31) | Ah, verstehe. Gut, dass das geklärt werden konnte; so lassen sich wiederholte Ungereimtheiten vermeiden. Danke commented 2026-09-25 13:13:57 UTC by Geo-Tobi ♦316 |
| 189539886 (Comments: 1) | thechelsuk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Seems like this has been an issue for a while. Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! I've also removed the note that referenced the hotel. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-09-25 13:12:55 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189535819 (Comments: 1) | Tom Nevill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, are you sure this (way/700104246) is best tagged as highway=pedestrian? I think highway=service and motor_vehicle=permissive would be better tags - access=private and motor_vehicle=permissive are conflicting with regard to access. Also (was alrea... commented 2026-09-25 13:06:15 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 97899086 (Comments: 2) | Thibault Rommel (Discussed changesets: 59) | De locatie klopt volgens mijn foto/survey van 5 jaar terug. De Mapillaryafbeelding kan ik (nog) niet laden. commented 2026-09-25 13:05:12 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦94 |
| 189529296 (Comments: 1) | Jordan Thomas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Change looks good! Can't see this on aerial imagery yet but I assume it's v new. Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map! If you have any way to capture imagery here that would be incredibly appreciated! ... commented 2026-09-25 13:04:56 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 162417306 (Comments: 2) | Sebasawk (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi Mateusz. The tag was “shop = alcohol, beverage” and while I removed the comma and replaced with a semicolon, I failed to catch the typo. I have made the corrections now, and it should be in order. Thank you for reaching out and letting... commented 2026-09-25 13:03:26 UTC by Sebasawk ♦20 |
| 189543478 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 24) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-09-25 12:57:16 UTC by sahshoor ♦31 |
| 189542937 (Comments: 3) | FransB (Discussed changesets: 7) | No problem.. Ik heb het al hersteld. commented 2026-09-25 12:56:07 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189504493 (Comments: 1) | hlescot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189543309 commented 2026-09-25 12:55:29 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189542816 (Comments: 1) | FransB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Adres hersteld commented 2026-09-25 12:55:03 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189536049 (Comments: 1) | Tom Nevill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your changes. FYI, I've removed the height=n/a tag from the gate as it didn't contain information about the gate's height - if you aren't sure of the height it's better to leave it blank - and changed the road acce... commented 2026-09-25 12:54:36 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 186445006 (Comments: 3) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 30) | I think the maproullette hint was about the small part with incline, 40 centimeter on a longer driveway_link. If you draw a city with all separate sidewalks, the level of detail is increased, so there a more small parts because surface changes. If yo... commented 2026-09-25 12:54:04 UTC by Allroads ♦467 |
| 189543030 (Comments: 1) | FransB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Maar zou het adres dan misschie nog bestaan? MVG eggie commented 2026-09-25 12:53:10 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189542757 (Comments: 1) | FransB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zou het adres nog kunnen bestaan? MVG eggie commented 2026-09-25 12:49:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189542672 (Comments: 2) | FransB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Adressen hersteld commented 2026-09-25 12:49:12 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189426421 (Comments: 2) | barefootstache (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks for fixing that with clarifications. I was hoping Vespucci had a validator, but it seems like it's not the case. commented 2026-09-25 12:46:20 UTC by barefootstache ♦15 |
| 185898819 (Comments: 4) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 17) | Surely using `description` tag is the way to go, but the catch is that many user facing osm "viewers" won't display it (mapbox included, as I see). Not OSM's problem, though, but something to keep in mind. Sometimes you've... commented 2026-09-25 12:44:32 UTC by McKulkin ♦50 |
| 140875575 (Comments: 1) | Maradona11 (Discussed changesets: 64) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5538577 ? commented 2026-09-25 12:42:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189396050 (Comments: 3) | preschoolglitter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice nice! And ye lifecycle tagging is very useful, we also use it a lot when stuff shows up on aerial imagery to stop other mappers re-mapping the same feature. Well worth checking out the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_pre... commented 2026-09-25 12:37:09 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 167236369 (Comments: 1) | FinnGW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392413221/history has building:levels = unk that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-25 12:37:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 143810341 (Comments: 1) | Ke945 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220816784/history has building:flats = 01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended t... commented 2026-09-25 12:36:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189541018 (Comments: 2) | zaadstra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkomstbericht gezien, dank je! commented 2026-09-25 12:30:18 UTC by zaadstra ♦1 |
| 136634970 (Comments: 1) | blak-likorish (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312525567/history has building:flats = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intende... commented 2026-09-25 12:30:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 173203095 (Comments: 1) | krzysmek (Discussed changesets: 22) | jakie źródło tej zmiany? w PRG ani w PRNG nie widzę takiej nazwy oraz mieszkam w okolicy i nigdy nie słyszałam żeby była taka wieś commented 2026-09-25 12:25:55 UTC by lukabułka ♦49 |
| 189049522 (Comments: 2) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hi Lyon-St-Clair, thank for reaching out. According to the project plans available on https://herault.fr/cms_viewFile.php?idtf=3227&path=LIEN-Plan-du-projet.pdf&dl=1, D102 is supposed to connect to the new road via the circular geometries. Ho... commented 2026-09-25 12:23:09 UTC by Tinetto ♦25 |
| 189526917 (Comments: 1) | Lyubo B (Discussed changesets: 1) | Благодаря за промяната! Не е необходимо адреса на магазина да се дублира. Отбелязан е веднъж върху сградата. След като точката за маг... commented 2026-09-25 12:22:37 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,039 |
| 189519220 (Comments: 1) | Brandon Pineda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Service-alley es como para otra cosa... son callejones de servicio, muy típico en estados unidos, pero no acá... acá un pasaje muy pequeño dejarlo como living_street o track, si es que es algo muy rural y parecido a ... commented 2026-09-25 12:22:16 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189384955 (Comments: 2) | Shre_WD (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi PierZen, thanks for the message. We generally follow what you’re suggesting but my friend Ky_AT was also mapping on the same MapRoulette challenge, and we decided to upload task-by-task to avoid unintentional conflicts. We can look for other... commented 2026-09-25 12:19:52 UTC by Shre_WD ♦10 |
| 189387289 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi PierZen, thank you for reaching out and for sharing your insights. Since the edits are resulting from a Maproulette challenge and other colleagues were also editing with me at the same time, we opted to edit only the building within the task scope... commented 2026-09-25 12:19:15 UTC by Ky_AT ♦24 |
| 189474575 (Comments: 1) | Rooster_21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189541613 commented 2026-09-25 12:17:55 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189505711 (Comments: 1) | JoacoVM3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. Si algo no tiene nombre, no agregarlo simplemente. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189505711 commented 2026-09-25 12:15:11 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189451647 (Comments: 3) | Shel_Sri (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi JeroenHoek, Thank you for making the corrections and explaining the issue. Yes, my task was to address the duplicated highway. I see that changing the alignment of the cycleway was unnecessary on my side. I understand the impact clearly. I&rsqu... commented 2026-09-25 12:06:12 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦13 |
| 189488155 (Comments: 1) | micccey (Discussed changesets: 24) | ich verstehe die Artikel vom NDR so, dass der Grund für die Explosion unklar ist, die Explosion selber haben Freunde und Bekannte von mir persönlich sogar gehört commented 2026-09-25 11:53:33 UTC by sinusnombre ♦2 |
| 187032057 (Comments: 5) | RJ Lerng (Discussed changesets: 8) | Yes, I think so. "Every Door" has given me a lot of headaches and it uses American terms, very confusing, but it has been handy when I was outside. My phone has difficulty editing in iD. Its Internet reception is not very good. Could yo... commented 2026-09-25 11:51:32 UTC by RJ Lerng ♦7 |
| 189514072 (Comments: 1) | Ceyzeriat (Discussed changesets: 4) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5538522 ? commented 2026-09-25 11:50:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 183651557 (Comments: 1) | AnnaCatarina (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488114053/history has building = razed that was added in this edit If it is really razed, it should be deleted (maybe, for some time, mapped as razed:building= ). If it is not razed then building=razed is w... commented 2026-09-25 11:49:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 126815520 (Comments: 2) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hi again 😄 Every occurence should be fixed now. Thank you again for your help! Charles of Carto’Cité commented 2026-09-25 11:47:54 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,207 |
| 189537100 (Comments: 4) | Berlok (Discussed changesets: 2) | Añadiré de nuevo ese tramo visible. Gracias commented 2026-09-25 11:43:13 UTC by Berlok ♦1 |
| 189532391 (Comments: 1) | Nietnagel (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin, hier hab ich auch noch eine andere idee. Anstatt lanes=1 ist hier glaube ich lane_markings=no richtiger oder? Flo commented 2026-09-25 11:42:50 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 189501544 (Comments: 1) | Stannorth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189540212 commented 2026-09-25 11:42:31 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189532214 (Comments: 1) | Nietnagel (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin, diese änderung passt nicht zu den dort laut tagging stehenden Schildern. Das ist auf der Straße getagged: DE:255,1020-30 Demach war das motorcycle=destination schon richtig. Wenn sich die Beschilderung ... commented 2026-09-25 11:42:11 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 189537683 (Comments: 2) | kvmh18 (Discussed changesets: 2) | исправила commented 2026-09-25 11:39:32 UTC by kvmh18 ♦2 |
| 189538339 (Comments: 3) | kvmh18 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Добрый день! Действительно, забыла указать возможность прохода для пешеходов и велосипедистов. Исправила) Спасибо за комментарий! commented 2026-09-25 11:37:15 UTC by kvmh18 ♦2 |
| 154467258 (Comments: 1) | Cathest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303800909/history has building:flats = 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here |
| 170146785 (Comments: 1) | Lombroso (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420917666/history has building:levels = あ1 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-25 11:29:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189538877 (Comments: 1) | Jowhan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Er is hier al een adresnode. De straatnaam hoeft niet op de gebouwomtrek. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Comm... commented 2026-09-25 11:26:57 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 187149454 (Comments: 3) | armnd21 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21348 commented 2026-09-25 11:20:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 126812175 (Comments: 1) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hello! You used cycleway:left=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26051787/history Have you maybe meant cycleway:left=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2026-09-25 11:18:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 174480992 (Comments: 1) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hello! You used cycleway:left=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014265016/history Have you maybe meant cycleway:left=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2026-09-25 11:18:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189537684 (Comments: 2) | Martinligabue (Discussed changesets: 32) | sorry, I missed it in the editor, I'll clean up the area a bit more carefully commented 2026-09-25 11:17:54 UTC by Martinligabue ♦63 |
| 189536444 (Comments: 4) | Steven VGGM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Top, dankjewel! commented 2026-09-25 11:05:14 UTC by Steven VGGM ♦1 |
| 189484757 (Comments: 3) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Dann lass den name (ohne ehem.) ruhig erstmal dran so lange sonst nichts drin ist. Kannst für andere Mapper ja noch ein note=* bzgl. deiner Entscheidung hinterlassen commented 2026-09-25 10:57:47 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189453223 (Comments: 3) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Moin Sorry, mein Fehler. Hab nicht geguckt, ob du nochmal an der Station dran warst. Bist auf den Eintrag von name=* und der zwei fehlenden Stecker (ich vermute mal Buchsen) passt es Schönes Wochenende :) commented 2026-09-25 10:56:19 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189039109 (Comments: 1) | Génesis nayeli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, You made a mistake on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189616839/history which has been fixed. Kind regards commented 2026-09-25 10:54:48 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦165 |
| 189537893 (Comments: 1) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 125) | https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/NG.html commented 2026-09-25 10:52:15 UTC by Dave Venables ♦185 |
| 189013252 (Comments: 2) | PalMaper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also you deleted this building under the stairs, there are doors under the stairs to enter the building, it does exist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1550345556 commented 2026-09-25 10:46:29 UTC by TheLNL ♦15 |
| 189399557 (Comments: 5) | aldoct (Discussed changesets: 32) | comunque ci sono tag name, alt_name e loc_name. penso che meglio di così non possiamo fare / ottimizzare commented 2026-09-25 10:46:19 UTC by GiovanniPen ♦34 |
| 189536389 (Comments: 1) | mapperich (Discussed changesets: 41) | the place is still present, also the address was removed too https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189537684 commented 2026-09-25 10:44:40 UTC by Martinligabue ♦63 |
| 189239802 (Comments: 1) | Ajijul@yt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). It would be good to provide the source for your changes... commented 2026-09-25 10:35:10 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦838 |
| 189535706 (Comments: 4) | Joranvar (Discussed changesets: 3) | No problem. In OSM Nederland taggen we bedrijven bij op de import adresnodes vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) Nieuwe bedrijven svp ook bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode. De info heb ik nu even samengevoegd. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-09-25 10:33:13 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189496080 (Comments: 1) | gauravKS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-09-25 10:33:02 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦838 |
| 189150920 (Comments: 1) | Mekala Murali (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-09-25 10:30:47 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦838 |
| 189342087 (Comments: 1) | Roy098 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-09-25 10:26:50 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦838 |
| 189376946 (Comments: 1) | nagamalla akashvind (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-09-25 10:22:43 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦838 |
| 189530608 (Comments: 3) | Gemeinde Diemelsee (Discussed changesets: 3) | Der Name laut Webseite ist: Schutzhütte Stormbruch - Nordrhein-Westfalen ist ganz nah Daher kam das wohl. Im Zweifel den verwenden. commented 2026-09-25 10:03:30 UTC by giggls ♦125 |
| 164837114 (Comments: 3) | FERINA365 (Discussed changesets: 77) | "T.h.v. Achthoven-West staat een kombord met "Achthoven-west"." Waar bedoel je precies? Ik kan deze zo snel niet vinden. Als het goed is, is het ook geen kombord, gezien Achthoven als woonplaats niet bestaat. Mogelijk als buurt... commented 2026-09-25 10:03:11 UTC by DwarfNebula_ ♦73 |
| 189506401 (Comments: 3) | roho27283 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Das ist so nicht korrekt, access= zunächst den allgemeinen Wert (hier: Landwirtschaftlich darf durch), die feineren Werte überschreiben das dann wieder. Siehe auch die zugehörige Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ac... commented 2026-09-25 10:01:09 UTC by mgerken ♦82 |
| 189504532 (Comments: 1) | hlescot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189535568 commented 2026-09-25 09:58:26 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189535641 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 124) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 188537102, 188537239, 188537309, 188537973, 188538015, 188557068, 188557969, 188558350, 188595848, 188595859, 188595914, 188595969, 188596017, 188602541, 188602563, 188604133, 188604174, 188... commented 2026-09-25 09:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290624 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188604286 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188595969 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289252 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189291219 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188537102 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188595859 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290375 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290780 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289479 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188557969 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290692 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289209 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188537973 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289037 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290545 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188602563 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188604174 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290068 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188604133 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289372 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188738399 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188557068 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289538 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289641 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188537309 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188738629 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289102 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290963 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289674 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188604227 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188595848 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189291138 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289016 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188538015 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189289061 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290793 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290822 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290580 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188596017 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189291296 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188537239 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188558350 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188595914 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189291597 (Comments: 2) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189291505 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188602541 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290487 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:50 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189290868 (Comments: 1) | Nafeesbbk (Discussed changesets: 49) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189535641 where the changeset comment is: remove places added from Google Places commented 2026-09-25 09:56:50 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 188902680 (Comments: 2) | FA-KW (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ja gerne. Über eine eventuelle Wiederverwendung der Relationen kann erst später entschieden werden. Bitte alles stark einkürzen und abwarten. Danke commented 2026-09-25 09:52:09 UTC by FA-KW ♦7 |
| 189529204 (Comments: 2) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 52) | openstreetmap.org/changeset/189535013 commented 2026-09-25 09:42:09 UTC by Akrimullah ♦48 |
| 189514227 (Comments: 1) | Richard Carden (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi again Please add meaningful changeset comments to describe what you are doing to your fellow mappers. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Cheers Phil. commented 2026-09-25 09:40:36 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189530402 (Comments: 1) | Yuri Matias (Discussed changesets: 8) | Desculpe pela alteração da velocidade de vias! commented 2026-09-25 09:35:08 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189481105 (Comments: 2) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 52) | Maaf untuk tag highway=primary pada jalan tersebut itu dikarenakan fungsinya sebagai jalan utama menuju stasiun Ngawi, sedangkan stasiun Ngawi itu sendiri merupakan stasiun utama bagi kabupaten Ngawi jadi sebaiknya klasifikasi nya ditingkatkan menjad... commented 2026-09-25 09:34:40 UTC by Gaung Tebono ♦52 |
| 189480601 (Comments: 3) | E-vun (Discussed changesets: 2) | да я в курсе, ездил там )) теперь его частично заменяет введенный огрызок РАЛ commented 2026-09-25 09:30:49 UTC by literan ♦7,236 |
| 189499941 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 47) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189533407 commented 2026-09-25 09:04:38 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 169962119 (Comments: 1) | Fabi Fuu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao Fabi Fuu Gestern auf dem Gurten ist mir aufgefallen, dass du https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13048461514/history/1 als Duplikat vom Brunnen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4396720553/history erfasst hast, der schon seit 10 Jahren hier e... commented 2026-09-25 08:52:45 UTC by habi ♦2,268 |
| 189489650 (Comments: 3) | peregs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bon dia Pere, Mirant a street view, només he pogit trobar dos carrers dins de l'urbanització, just a sota del Camí Parellades, amb senyals d'accés privat, que he etiquetat com a access=private per a restri... commented 2026-09-25 08:50:01 UTC by marcmarti ♦106 |
| 189487953 (Comments: 1) | Corinne BEM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Corinne Du hast da die stop position wahrscheinlich gelöscht und durch eine Platform ersetzt. Die Platform hast du hinten an der Bus 30 Route eingesetzt. Mit Id Editor kann man es nicht anders machen. Das erzeugt bei mir einen Fehler. |
| 189498229 (Comments: 2) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 44) | https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/ commented 2026-09-25 08:30:12 UTC by palycka ♦4 |
| 189530968 (Comments: 4) | Hansje123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Adressen herteld. Pas op met schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. je selecteert dan onbedoeld een adresnode en schuift dan met de kaart. Dan schuift niet de kaart, maar het adres. Steeds goed kijken of je niet iets per abuis hebt geselecteerd. <... commented 2026-09-25 08:20:15 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 181050129 (Comments: 3) | vogelfreier (Discussed changesets: 109) | Mapping landuse to the road area doesn't work when there are POIs or different types of landuse nearby. It also makes editing significantly more complicated when landuse needs to be split. Mapping landuse to plot boundaries (i.e. where th... commented 2026-09-25 08:12:06 UTC by Joel Koen ♦87 |
| 189321681 (Comments: 1) | Yuri2001 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189531291 commented 2026-09-25 08:02:54 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189531109 (Comments: 1) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 281) | Ponadto środkowy docinek obok Rawicy ma fatalny stan nawierzchni, nie jest to wiec droga kluczowa w skali całego regioniu, nie pełni tez zadnego skrótu i nie wyróznia sie na tle innych primary commented 2026-09-25 07:57:56 UTC by voltairovicz ♦252 |
| 189514987 (Comments: 2) | Hiiii808205i924 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. This changeset includes one part in England and one part in Turkmenistan, which should have been uploaded as two separate changesets, as @amosharper correctly pointed out. This lone "boundary" seems strange; it looks li... commented 2026-09-25 07:57:02 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,080 |
| 189489725 (Comments: 1) | Hepos (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Hepos , findest Du hier irgendwo eine Beschilderung, dass „Wegverlauf: 389460277“ eine Einbahnregelung beinhaltet die für Radfahrer mit (oneway:bicyle=no) aufgehoben werden sollte? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=9227... commented 2026-09-25 07:53:27 UTC by pitfire ♦757 |
| 189027785 (Comments: 1) | Ornits (Discussed changesets: 7) | שלום, שינית את התיוג של הפאמפטרק בלי סיבה. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497752529 התיוג הנכון לאתר עצמו הוא pitch. המסלול הוא track. תראה בוויקי. commented 2026-09-25 07:46:44 UTC by hatul ♦529 |
| 189288218 (Comments: 1) | WindowsDefen517 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, je viens d'enlever les deux attributs que vous avez ajouté car dans ce cas ils doivent être mis sur la relation plutôt que sur la caméra ou sur le feu (voir le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:... commented 2026-09-25 07:45:27 UTC by Syl ♦1,120 |
| 185890805 (Comments: 1) | Michael Mosmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke fürs zufügen von einem Radstreifen, aber hier ist kein Radweg oder Radstreifen. Ich verstehe schon, dass sich die Straße wie ein Radweg anfühlt, aber Anliegerverkehr ist hier erlaubt. Und in den Niederlanden ist es n... commented 2026-09-25 07:45:07 UTC by martiensch ♦82 |
| 189462496 (Comments: 1) | JDubMTB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189530595 commented 2026-09-25 07:44:03 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 186592134 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | `disputed:place=` would mean it's contested in reality. I would use `fixme:place=` for OSM. commented 2026-09-25 07:36:01 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,050 |
| 189510595 (Comments: 1) | Znaika (Discussed changesets: 55) | 2 Schutzpoller an den Seiten wurden errichtet commented 2026-09-25 07:35:12 UTC by Znaika ♦224 |
| 189519651 (Comments: 1) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 110) | There was a minor error on Thorley Lane southbound exit from the roundabout with the oneway set the wrong way preventing exit from the roundabout which I've corrected in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189530014#map=19/53.38862... commented 2026-09-25 07:27:14 UTC by Trafford_Mapper ♦21 |
 | 189429233 (Comments: 1) | abner88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189529685 commented 2026-09-25 07:17:51 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189462257 (Comments: 1) | Quikbek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry, dass ich grad nervig bin :) Freue mich über neue Mitstreiter*innen bei OSM und versuche dann möglichst früh "Anfängerfehler" einzufangen, damit später nicht so viel Aufräumarbeiten nötig sind... commented 2026-09-25 07:12:48 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189462390 (Comments: 1) | Quikbek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin :) kann man hier auch Zelten? Ist https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site ggf. besser? Oder eine andere Variante der camp_site=* ? cheers --- Published using OSMC... commented 2026-09-25 07:09:47 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189436734 (Comments: 2) | MK2705 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Vielen Dank für den Kommentar, du hast natürlich recht, der access-Tag ist fälschlicherweise reingerutscht. Eigentlich bin ich mit den access-Tags eher vorsichtig, hatte die letzten Tage einige fehlerhafte access-Tags eigentlich sogar ... commented 2026-09-25 07:08:53 UTC by MK2705 ♦13 |
| 189463262 (Comments: 1) | Quikbek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, du bist aktuell fleißig :) Bitte beachte ein paar Dinge: Keep it local. Heißt: Nicht quer über ganz DE Dinge editieren. Mach was an der Küste, speichern. Dann irgendwo im Süden, speichern. Dann die ... commented 2026-09-25 07:07:57 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189320171 (Comments: 1) | Rubenke (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hoi, De oever/slootkant is hier een soort rietland en "reed bed" leek me het meest passend. Het gaat hier niet om gras, wat blijkt uit: A) een feitelijke observatie ter plekke B) online street-level foto's C... commented 2026-09-25 07:04:54 UTC by Wereldkaart123 ♦32 |
| 189320457 (Comments: 1) | Gabryel ofck (Discussed changesets: 37) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189527351 commented 2026-09-25 07:04:17 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
 | 189304517 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189526835 commented 2026-09-25 07:03:32 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
 | 189297577 (Comments: 1) | Ale XanDre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189524203 commented 2026-09-25 07:03:01 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189319913 (Comments: 1) | WhiteCockatiel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189493957 commented 2026-09-25 07:02:30 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189304375 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189493570 commented 2026-09-25 07:01:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189312021 (Comments: 1) | Intersport Val Gardena (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189492398 commented 2026-09-25 07:01:06 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
 | 189508437 (Comments: 1) | Sazzad's Amazing Dental (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is spam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1562019223 commented 2026-09-25 06:59:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
 | 189466537 (Comments: 3) | RobertoAntonio052600PA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks @ajmat commented 2026-09-25 06:57:04 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
| 189487271 (Comments: 1) | Gemeinde Diemelsee (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin von nebenan :) Namen sind immer ein tricky Thema weshalb ich euch die Leküre von name=* ans Herz legen möchte. Grad Namen, die eigentlich "nur" das wiedergeben, was die Eigenschaft schon aussagt sind immer etwa... commented 2026-09-25 06:54:19 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189205088 (Comments: 7) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 55) | `permit=yes` does not imply `access=permit`. Stop hallucinating. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:permit commented 2026-09-25 06:52:24 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 181021360 (Comments: 2) | mapko (Discussed changesets: 73) | Zdravim. Nastavil som v OSM. commented 2026-09-25 06:46:06 UTC by mapko ♦119 |
| 189521389 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Meu querido, olha a placa de 40 km/h aqui: https://www.google.com/maps/@-18.8689757,-41.9527567,164a,15y,10.28h,88.66t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sLdvs0tn9zrzIMTCOUxec_g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client... commented 2026-09-25 06:35:11 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦29 |
| 189479402 (Comments: 1) | Stefan177 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hab auch die neue Bank gesehen. Dürfte passen :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189479402 commented 2026-09-25 06:26:08 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189515345 (Comments: 2) | RON EMMANUEL (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have restored it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189528014 commented 2026-09-25 06:25:30 UTC by Mannivu ♦293 |
| 189466112 (Comments: 1) | RobertoAntonio052600PA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189527212 commented 2026-09-25 06:04:12 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
 | 188814300 (Comments: 5) | Alban yolu (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Alban yolu, wile fixing your errors I found that you have added a hiking relation to start editing this hiking route properly: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21420390/history#map=15/41.74260/46.38287 I have fixed your app... commented 2026-09-25 06:03:29 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 189367299 (Comments: 4) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 47) | Bonjour, Seul moi va voir votre réponse dans ce changeset. Venez en discuter sur le forum :) commented 2026-09-25 06:01:12 UTC by K12230LF ♦83 |
| 151195732 (Comments: 1) | PeterMapit (Discussed changesets: 14) | May I ask what addr:number=1 on house 7 (Barn End) is supposed to signify? commented 2026-09-25 06:00:19 UTC by MagicPocketbook462 ♦19 |
| 189406607 (Comments: 6) | Ktnwxlr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Eine Möglichkeit solche durch doppelte Sperrlinien getrennte Richtungsfahrbahnen abzubilden wäre change:lanes:*=*. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change Ob und inwiefern das berücksichtigt wird, hängt jedoch... commented 2026-09-25 06:00:07 UTC by wolfgang8 ♦82 |
| 189463101 (Comments: 2) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi AlexeySib, thank you for confirming the state of the POI, understood. One thing, if the business is still identifiable from the storefront, or via available street level imagery, a lifecycle tag might be better than deletion: https://wiki.open... commented 2026-09-25 05:50:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189502425 (Comments: 4) | miksuko (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-25 05:22:55 UTC by Bovi887 ♦28 |
| 137601195 (Comments: 2) | rittoch (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi aceman444! Thank you for your comment and the changes made. I take this into account when working on similar cases in the future. Best regards, rittoch commented 2026-09-25 05:22:22 UTC by rittoch ♦17 |
| 183535425 (Comments: 3) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 183) | Добавил примерное расположение моста. Gps не показывал точной позиции. commented 2026-09-25 05:18:56 UTC by solenoid jam ♦208 |
| 184360466 (Comments: 2) | PeeWee32 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Aanvullend: in de wiki staat bij barrier=hedge "If there is a fence adjacent to the hedge to make it stock proof, it is preferable to map the hedge if only one barrier is to be mapped." Ik heb bij de Kopermolen alvast een stukje als haag... commented 2026-09-25 05:18:21 UTC by UL-mapper ♦4 |
| 189501944 (Comments: 3) | miksuko (Discussed changesets: 4) | korjattu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189525838 kiitos kun huomasit! commented 2026-09-25 05:11:12 UTC by miksuko ♦6 |
| 186520864 (Comments: 2) | ∇Michael (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte mich bei der Anpassung der Klassifizierung an der Seite DE:Key:highway orientiert und dabei die Anmerkung auf DE:Tag:highway=primary, dass Bundesstraßen nicht zwangsläufig als `highway=primary` ... commented 2026-09-25 05:09:31 UTC by ∇Michael ♦1 |
| 189419634 (Comments: 1) | Jaclyn5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For way 1561443387 "Sunday: Closed, Monday:7am-6pm Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday: 9am-7pm, Friday:7am-6pm, Saturday: 8am-4pm" shou... commented 2026-09-25 05:00:44 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦79 |
| X | 189525301 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 請勿破壞de facto狀況，目前東沙島由臺灣控制 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189525546 commented 2026-09-25 04:52:00 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,374 |
| 167246815 (Comments: 2) | asc (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, Thank you for noticing this. You are right it is just a typo and I intended to use `shop=sports`. I will update the node, right after I write this comment. :) All the best, Andrew commented 2026-09-25 04:31:55 UTC by asc ♦5 |
| 184243509 (Comments: 2) | jeka p (Discussed changesets: 123) | Morgen! es ist ziemlich schwierig in OSM mit unterirdischen Tiefgaragen. Wenn ich die Tiefgarage ziemlich gut kenne, probiere ich die unterirdische Gänge zu verbinden. Wie z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1552637285 Habe... commented 2026-09-25 04:30:47 UTC by jeka p ♦230 |
| 189502489 (Comments: 5) | Benjii K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Al relevant info. er velkomment. commented 2026-09-25 04:30:36 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,927 |
| 189514823 (Comments: 1) | Hepos (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ungewöhnliche Aussage. Wie ist denn der Verbindungsweg Beschildert, dass es ein "oneway:bicycle=-1" braucht. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway:bicycle?uselang=de oneway:bicycle=-1 bedeutet, dass der Weg f&... commented 2026-09-25 04:14:58 UTC by pitfire ♦757 |
| 188942848 (Comments: 1) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 9) | So I uncharacteristically forgot to post sources here, and found out the hard way that there’s no way to go back and fix that. Given how unusual it is for *part of* a border to have a unique name in a language, it’s worth discussing furth... commented 2026-09-25 03:34:43 UTC by Tuwewanzi ♦9 |
| 186214886 (Comments: 2) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 13) | @Mateusz%20Konieczny the value is correct, the crossing is a crossing:markings=lines but with only one line instead of two commented 2026-09-25 03:10:14 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦16 |
| 189520045 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 39) | I removed them because i felt like it was sort of unsafe to have that detail, but im not sure, im sort of new to this. commented 2026-09-25 03:09:34 UTC by Winterfureternal ♦1 |
| 189451520 (Comments: 2) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 55) | 1. Where was that stated? I never heard that before. Also, when you reverted, you omitted the original tag, permit=yes. Why? commented 2026-09-25 03:07:10 UTC by Hypsometric ♦75 |
| 187765832 (Comments: 8) | Sun2306 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Shinsplints, The first question you have is better suited for the OpenStreetMap Community Forum. https://community.openstreetmap.org OpenStreetMap already provides some tags for handling the trail attributes you described.<... commented 2026-09-25 02:57:44 UTC by eerib ♦380 |
| 187166519 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | I don't see how iD has anything to do with our tagging; one can always type the tags manually. But ok, I will take a look at Github. commented 2026-09-25 02:37:42 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 189508823 (Comments: 1) | Warren Wilcock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Warren, did you realize that you changed the outline of the river to have highway=secondary? Since this is obviously a mistake, I've already taken care of reverting this change. What part of the bridge were you trying to fix? It appears to al... commented 2026-09-25 02:35:49 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦147 |
| 189369523 (Comments: 1) | jackson_gay (Discussed changesets: 2) | what is the source of these edits? these roads look fake commented 2026-09-25 02:35:03 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦16 |
| 187881767 (Comments: 1) | DanielAgos (Discussed changesets: 9) | Olá, DanielAgos. A razão pela qual eu, mais do que uma vez, apaguei esta rua pedonal, foi porque, quando passo junto da mesma e a vejo... da maneira como ela agora está, bloqueada em ambas as extremidades, e porque fica colada &a... commented 2026-09-25 02:33:30 UTC by renosmo ♦9 |
| 172453306 (Comments: 1) | B-Mac A-Tac (Discussed changesets: 7) | Pine Plantation Trail should be removed- it is an unofficial trail, and the USFS would like to limit off-trail navigation due to ordinance, user safety, and ecological impact. commented 2026-09-25 02:32:16 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 189522976 (Comments: 1) | srkniery (Discussed changesets: 2) | Trails plan documentation: https://woodlandswv.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/EAST_Trail-Master-Plan.pdf commented 2026-09-25 02:27:05 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 189204585 (Comments: 2) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 55) | It looks like the end could be a note instead of what is signed: `DE:"Radfahrer und Fußgänger",DE:"Gespanne und Fahrzeuge mit Sondergenehmigung frei"` Which tag do you think is incorrect? Thanks! commented 2026-09-25 02:23:34 UTC by Hypsometric ♦75 |
| 189205121 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 55) | `access=permit` is just a completely fictitious hallucination. All pedestrians can use it. commented 2026-09-25 02:19:55 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 189205118 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 55) | `access=permit` is just a completely fictitious hallucination. All pedestrians can use it. commented 2026-09-25 02:19:51 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 189205047 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 55) | `access=permit` is just a completely fictitious hallucination. All pedestrians can use it. commented 2026-09-25 02:19:44 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 189204984 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 55) | `access=permit` is just a completely fictitious hallucination. All pedestrians can use it. commented 2026-09-25 02:19:31 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 189511927 (Comments: 2) | daniel v s (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola gràcies per ajudar amb el teus comentaris. Aquestes edificacions ja están acabades. Visc a Llofriu. Ho aniré corrregint. Ho he dibuixat primer en AutoCAD després amb el Gobal Maper ho he pasat a "OSM". Ja en... commented 2026-09-25 02:05:02 UTC by daniel v s ♦4 |
| 146952670 (Comments: 2) | Andre2005 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alterações de classificação de rodovia desfeita no changeset 188845557. commented 2026-09-25 02:03:15 UTC by adrianojbr ♦594 |
| 189522487 (Comments: 1) | A&S SISTEMAS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá, A&S SISTEMAS! Favor verificar o uso da etiqueta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:junction:ref Bem como a diferença entre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2026-09-25 01:58:51 UTC by adrianojbr ♦594 |
| 189521487 (Comments: 1) | m0ntyMaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios. Las etiquetas deberían ser religion=christian y denomination=jehovahs_witness. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración tenemos un foro y un canal de telegram... commented 2026-09-25 01:43:56 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189238310 (Comments: 2) | ChookMan (Discussed changesets: 11) | thanks 🙌 commented 2026-09-25 01:18:42 UTC by ChookMan ♦8 |
| 189516957 (Comments: 1) | Hillel Rosenfeld (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome! Thanks for your first contribution! Few points if you don't mind: 1. Recommend to take a look on local mapping guide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel 2. for name tag please use local spoken language. In mos... commented 2026-09-25 00:57:16 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189412317 (Comments: 2) | Weronika1101 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rzeczywiście, mój błąd. Bardzo dziękuję powinno być już poprawione. commented 2026-09-25 00:43:37 UTC by Weronika1101 ♦1 |
| X | 78230811 (Comments: 1) | Diego Sanguinetti (Discussed changesets: 41) | The source is now a deadlink. I am wondering why this was mapped as a stop area group. The wiki seems to indicate that stop area groups are meant for stations with modal changes such as large train stations eg LA Union. I get that these two light rai... commented 2026-09-25 00:33:45 UTC by MapleTrees ♦6 |
| 189518026 (Comments: 2) | ragnarok (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola graciass x responder. Si!! estoy buscando cual es la mejor forma de agregar las empresas, por eso puse a revisión. Hace rato que no mandaba info a osm. :( Puse la que laburo a modo de prueba pero la idea es agregar las empresas de te... commented 2026-09-25 00:28:19 UTC by ragnarok ♦1 |
| 189521334 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Vias locais não sinalizadas ou aquelas que não possui placas de velocidade regulamentadora é de 30 km/h de acordo com o Código de Trânsito Brasileiro (CTB) commented 2026-09-25 00:27:06 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189374355 (Comments: 3) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 47) | Développant depuis peu des spiders pour ATP, je peux confirmer que les données publiées par les sites sont loin d'être fiables. commented 2026-09-24 23:58:55 UTC by 14im ♦25 |
| 186328363 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 10) | The mapper attested to this node being properly placed. Restoring node to the map! commented 2026-09-24 23:55:16 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189514146 (Comments: 2) | gordoputo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola buenas, gracias por el feedback, ahi mismo ya correji los edificios superpuestos y elimine las tags de layer=*. commented 2026-09-24 23:30:46 UTC by gordoputo ♦1 |
| 189520537 (Comments: 1) | srkniery (Discussed changesets: 2) | Official USFS Mower Basin Trail Map can be found here: https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/nfs/files/publication/MowerBasinTrailMap_0.pdf Additional information about trails can be found on Mon Forest Towns Partnership Website: https://monforesttown... commented 2026-09-24 23:30:29 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 189374132 (Comments: 1) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 47) | Même question que le changement 189367299. Que faut-il préférer le site propre à l'entreprise ou son référencement dans la franchise ? commented 2026-09-24 23:26:18 UTC by 14im ♦25 |
| 189520272 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Em vias locais onde estou alterando é 30 km/h, e não 40km/h commented 2026-09-24 23:11:07 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 186274687 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 651) | hmmm https://github.com/osmose-qa/osmose-frontend/issues/591 commented 2026-09-24 22:57:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189513944 (Comments: 1) | jonatan1983 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cambios revertidos. Favor de cuidar el mapa. commented 2026-09-24 22:50:00 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189506239 (Comments: 1) | loteo baradero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, lamentablemente tuvimos que revertir sus cambios. Mantuvimos el dibujo del lote con las etiquetas que pueden corresponderle. Haberlo etiquetado como autopista entendemos que fue para mostrarlo de un color particular, lo cual pued... commented 2026-09-24 22:34:30 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189502377 (Comments: 1) | acelinho777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios. El etiquetado se ve bien para mí. Respecto de la eliminación de kioscos o buffets, está bien si no existe nada ahí. Si hay estructuras como de com... commented 2026-09-24 22:11:13 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189514378 (Comments: 1) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 72) | Ahoj, tady bude asi nějaká chyba. A ještě prosím koukni na https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2147789, z té se stala 59. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... commented 2026-09-24 21:29:05 UTC by Neptun_ ♦2 |
| 189341814 (Comments: 5) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 206) | ja się bardziej niepokoję co do koszerności źródeł commented 2026-09-24 21:26:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189404127 (Comments: 2) | molensteen (Discussed changesets: 47) | dankje eggie ik heb er natural=shrubbery van gemaakt commented 2026-09-24 21:26:41 UTC by molensteen ♦46 |
| 189501503 (Comments: 1) | Chris Fleming (Discussed changesets: 20) | It looks like the shop=* tag was added here by mistake? (formerly from a disused:shop=* lifecycle tag) commented 2026-09-24 21:21:57 UTC by jayaddison ♦52 |
| 141907183 (Comments: 2) | Kabads (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5537810 commented 2026-09-24 21:19:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189514680 (Comments: 1) | JBTheDude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-24 21:09:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189517471 (Comments: 1) | TrevMW (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is my first edit on OSM so happy to hear what I should work on! commented 2026-09-24 21:03:18 UTC by TrevMW ♦1 |
| 189511577 (Comments: 14) | ludozz (Discussed changesets: 6) | 👍 Nog 1 tip. Een fietskaart ziet cycleway als verhard, maar een path als onverhard. Dan is het belangrijk ivm de routering om surface=... te taggen. .. paving_stones.. wood.. e.d. commented 2026-09-24 20:52:55 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 172916137 (Comments: 11) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 37) | No es una acera ni una calzada. Tanto acera como calzada están abajo separadas de la senda. Es una senda, nada en la ley de tráfico ni el rgc prohibe pedalear ahí sin que hay una señal de prohibido. https://www.boe.... commented 2026-09-24 20:48:26 UTC by antoniovr ♦4 |
| 189510905 (Comments: 1) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 37) | No hay NINGUN prohibido bici y no es una acera. Eres tu quien esta mapeando su opinión frente a la realidad. Para que no se pueda entrar en bici requeriría un prohibido bici. En cambio sí están las señales de... commented 2026-09-24 20:32:46 UTC by antoniovr ♦4 |
| 189516252 (Comments: 1) | hatul (Discussed changesets: 44) | ביצוע decode ל־website עבור ways commented 2026-09-24 20:27:17 UTC by hatul ♦529 |
 | 173107915 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 324) | What was incorrect here? No explain, only "incorrect tagging" and many reverts. If not explained, will ask "higher instances". I made a lot of work on this and somebody simply reverts all only because he/she wants... really very &... commented 2026-09-24 20:23:40 UTC by David Kříž ♦12 |
| 133274223 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | Shouldn't the area around all the tennis courts be a recreation ground rather than a sport pitch or am I hallucinating commented 2026-09-24 20:21:34 UTC by I-76 ♦86 |
| 187245424 (Comments: 1) | FlockFree (Discussed changesets: 1) | This appears to be a CDOT traffic camera, not an ALPR. commented 2026-09-24 20:20:59 UTC by WhatHappened ♦1 |
| 189468188 (Comments: 6) | slyons17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahh that makes sense. Thanks so much! commented 2026-09-24 20:07:46 UTC by slyons17 ♦1 |
| 186822088 (Comments: 1) | Nicolas Vial (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello Nicolas, Thank you for your edit! According to the Bulgarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs there isn't a Lithuanian consulate in Bulgaria. There is a honorary consul but he isn't located here. See https://lt.lithuania-honorarycon... commented 2026-09-24 19:51:43 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,039 |
| 189514324 (Comments: 1) | FietsendDisco_v (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag FD Het zou best kunnen, maar daar ligt het water niet. (meer) Je zou het als vlak kunnen intekenen natuarl=water en dan zet je de naam op de waterway= stream MVG eggie commented 2026-09-24 19:50:57 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 188151894 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 404) | Hoi, Deze mapper is weer de boel aan het aanpassen .. o.a. ook de namen van het (niet bestaande) water. Dat laatste zou wel kunnen kloppen, maar die waterloop is opnieuw uitgegraven. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189514604#map=... commented 2026-09-24 19:48:31 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 168893419 (Comments: 1) | Wolfgang Holtz (Discussed changesets: 38) | Moin Wolfgang Holtz, wenn Du schon die ganzen Container löschst, dann denke daran alle Attribute bei dem neuen Node mit zu übernehmen. recycling:glass_bottles:colour ist bei der Aktion verloren gegangen. Viele Grüße, ... commented 2026-09-24 19:48:30 UTC by lyctkel ♦380 |
| 189514604 (Comments: 1) | FietsendDisco_v (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dit water is er helemaal niet meer. Er is een nieuwe loopt gergaven van het water. Nu geef je iets een naam van iets dat er niet meer is? MVG eggie commented 2026-09-24 19:43:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189514563 (Comments: 1) | FietsendDisco_v (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag FD, Maar dan vraag je toch eerst aan de voorgaande mapper waarom hij het Goorloop heeft genoemd. Waarom zou je het aanpassen naar vroeger tijden? MVG eggie commented 2026-09-24 19:41:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 184777967 (Comments: 3) | Zynko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks so much for reaching out to let me know. I'll review what I can see about restoring the node tonight. Thanks again! commented 2026-09-24 19:38:22 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189371447 (Comments: 1) | Studio Odontoiatrico Stere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buongiorno, il vostro contributo è molto apprezzato ma è una buona praticare scrivere una descrizione al “gruppo di modifiche” (quando si pubblica le modifiche) descrivendo le proprie modifiche effettuate. Arrivederci e graz... commented 2026-09-24 19:37:32 UTC by davide020382 ♦7 |
| 189143143 (Comments: 2) | VikasChandra_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | it is still there on the 2026 aerial imagery from Miami Dade county, why did you disconnect it? Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-09-24 19:33:31 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 189456470 (Comments: 4) | Rachel Evans (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pt. er det kun adresser der importeres/vedligeholdes. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?search=bot+&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go commented 2026-09-24 19:32:11 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,927 |
| 145423350 (Comments: 4) | Ivor Švihran (Discussed changesets: 29) | Taktiez ulice Male palenisko I-IV ste opakovane zmenili na Male Palenisko, pritom v oficialnych zdrojoch su nazvy s malym 'p' (napr. register adries, ZBGIS). Takze na aku kokalnu znalost sa tu odvolavate? Okrem toho ste zmenili hodnotu, ... commented 2026-09-24 19:30:52 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 189510821 (Comments: 1) | Cavmir (Discussed changesets: 1) | this changeset was almost purely SEO, I have added the correct office=* tag to make it at least useful and removed the SEO language from the description as that is not allowed in OSM, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenSt... commented 2026-09-24 19:24:59 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
 | 189412179 (Comments: 2) | BZVPNR (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Gudi, Thanks for highlighting the issue. I wasn't aware it creates issue. However, I don't know how to fix them systematically, as I only use the standard editor... I'll try, but won't promise. commented 2026-09-24 19:24:00 UTC by BZVPNR ♦2 |
| 188063124 (Comments: 1) | Aaaaaaaa22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | نرجوا أن تتوقف عن إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة commented 2026-09-24 19:22:37 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦766 |
| 189513363 (Comments: 1) | miekeh (Discussed changesets: 8) | En dus access private en highway=service commented 2026-09-24 19:22:28 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189513314 (Comments: 1) | miekeh (Discussed changesets: 8) | In dat geval access=private. Ik heb het aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-24 19:20:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189513205 (Comments: 1) | miekeh (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag miekeh, Beter access=private taggen ipv =no MVG eggie commented 2026-09-24 19:19:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189513039 (Comments: 1) | FietsendDisco_v (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wanneer woningen zijn verbouwd kun je om import vragen via het forum in het draadje.. BAG importverzoeken https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43 MVG eggie commented 2026-09-24 19:18:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189493330 (Comments: 2) | unfoxo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Relazione geologica PGT: sono stati fatti degli scavi e campionature in queste zone (tra cui quella che ho eliminato) e non risulta nessuna compromissione dello stato del suolo degna di nota: https://mycity.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/3600905/geoPGT-Zand... commented 2026-09-24 19:17:01 UTC by unfoxo ♦3 |
| 189512908 (Comments: 1) | FietsendDisco_v (Discussed changesets: 5) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-24 19:12:24 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 188524522 (Comments: 3) | bosboer (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ik heb ze allemaal op access=private gezet commented 2026-09-24 19:00:50 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦434 |
| 189288732 (Comments: 1) | osm_corn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo osm_corn, herzlich willkommen bei OSM und vielen Dank für deine Änderungen in Mitte! Ich habe einige der von dir erfassten Parkflächen wieder entfernt, da wir in OSM verschiedene Möglichkeiten haben, Straßenpark... commented 2026-09-24 18:48:58 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦467 |
| 189510877 (Comments: 1) | CatFitness (Discussed changesets: 5) | Source=survey commented 2026-09-24 18:46:19 UTC by CatFitness ♦3 |
| 189508386 (Comments: 4) | Blue_Clown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jetzt verstehe ich was du meinst. Danke dir für den Hinweis. commented 2026-09-24 18:43:49 UTC by Blue_Clown ♦1 |
| 189511005 (Comments: 1) | albi1a (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hei, zur Info. Achte mal allgemein auf Bäckerei Wahl. Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/b-bb-insolvenz-backerei-wahl/146118 Da könnte es das eine oder andere Geschäft nichtmehr geben. Danke Sven commented 2026-09-24 18:39:45 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,192 |
 | 189512041 (Comments: 1) | RLiner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great changeset man! try to add a node at the north pole to make the changeset area even bigger! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets commented 2026-09-24 18:37:23 UTC by marcmarti ♦106 |
| 187191002 (Comments: 2) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 191) | prøv stednavne på https://kortoverblik.dk/spatialmap commented 2026-09-24 18:35:18 UTC by kortgodt ♦121 |
| 164436991 (Comments: 3) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 53) | I agree it's an overreaction. You were mapping verifiable features. If others have a problem, they can help map missing features too. commented 2026-09-24 18:30:32 UTC by jacobwhall ♦51 |
| 134962586 (Comments: 4) | nurdafur (Discussed changesets: 111) | Ok, falls ich keine Hinweise auf den aktuellen Verlauf im Netz finde werde ich die Relation entfernen. commented 2026-09-24 18:22:41 UTC by chris66 ♦507 |
| 182816403 (Comments: 1) | PC Sluzba (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, dakujeme, ale nestaci len prepisat adresu a ponechat predajnu na Znievskej. Treba aj predajnu presunut na spravne miesto. Resp. lepsie je vytvorit/aktualizovat priestory na novej adrese. Povodne priestory zostavaju, na inu firmu. Opravil som. commented 2026-09-24 18:18:58 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 189511092 (Comments: 1) | slipstream-wa (Discussed changesets: 1) | * Capitol Forest not Taylor Mountain commented 2026-09-24 18:15:14 UTC by slipstream-wa ♦1 |
| 184898761 (Comments: 2) | Voonosm (Discussed changesets: 37) | Schon möglich :) Ich ändere meistens nur den Verlauf von Wegen und Strassen, um ihre Eckigkeit zu entfernen ... mit den Relationen darauf beschäftige ich mich idR nicht. commented 2026-09-24 18:12:15 UTC by Voonosm ♦15 |
| 189503691 (Comments: 1) | Pulchritude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pulchritude, can you double-check the placement of this ALPR feature? This seems like a strange location for something like that. Perhaps this is more of a temporary construction-related camera? commented 2026-09-24 17:56:56 UTC by Xvtn ♦509 |
| 189504102 (Comments: 1) | PhilLowry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi PhilLowry, can you double check your reclassification of FR 168 from unclassified to path? My general rule of thumb is that singletrack is generally highway=path, while doubletrack or ways wide enough for a 4-wheeled vehicle typically should at le... commented 2026-09-24 17:54:09 UTC by Xvtn ♦509 |
| 189489888 (Comments: 1) | landbru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola landbru. ¿Por qué has eliminado todos los PDIs, como la ermita, la iglesia o el Ayuntamiento? Esos elementos no han dejado de existir. Habrá que reponerlos. Saludos commented 2026-09-24 17:48:25 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,882 |
| 171377537 (Comments: 3) | TheFighter137 (Discussed changesets: 13) | created https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/1063 commented 2026-09-24 17:28:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187484597 (Comments: 3) | b2t2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes the bouncing back and forth is not optimal but there's no better alternative for the time being. That said, keep in mind a map is always an abstraction of reality. Although we strive to map as much detail as reasonably possible, that's ... commented 2026-09-24 17:27:35 UTC by Lezurex ♦245 |
| 189240600 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | On second thought, your suggestion makes sense. commented 2026-09-24 17:24:44 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189501116 (Comments: 1) | Nature active (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Ces noms descriptifs issus du cadastre ne sont pas de "vrais" noms que l'on retrouve sur le terrain. Dans le meilleur des cas il faut les traiter avec un attribut "description" plutôt que "name"... commented 2026-09-24 17:19:35 UTC by acubens71 ♦53 |
| 186523763 (Comments: 8) | Illio (Discussed changesets: 53) | A co s castou, kde nie je les? Ale len preto, ze su tam stromy, to nemusi byt len les. Moze sa prekryvat ine landuse/leisure/amenity a les (stromy) byt na tom (na niektorych miestach). Ale teda ak je to podla Vas len prirodny les s novym nazvom, moze... commented 2026-09-24 17:17:05 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 189506561 (Comments: 1) | De C (Discussed changesets: 26) | It's `man_made=bridge` , not `landuse=construction` commented 2026-09-24 17:12:10 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,050 |
| 189508597 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | As vias locais aquelas que não tem sinalização regulamentadora é 30km/h, e nas vias coletoras é de 40 km/h, e não 60 km/h em todas as vias urbanas commented 2026-09-24 17:09:43 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189384597 (Comments: 3) | Gurmeet Shahpur (Discussed changesets: 1) | You can do it similarly to how you added the Shahpur name. I see you are using the iD editor. If there are no village markers yet, you can add one by adding a point (at the top in my browser) and changing its type to 'village'. But ... commented 2026-09-24 17:08:58 UTC by Seyruun ♦31 |
| 188710235 (Comments: 2) | Vonter (Discussed changesets: 32) | Thanks for mentioning this. I've fixed it in a new changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189508669 commented 2026-09-24 17:08:41 UTC by Vonter ♦82 |
| 188181076 (Comments: 1) | hmbplease (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, weiß nicht ob ich ganz der Änderung zu highway=footway zustimmen würde. Weder Wegbreite noch Beschilderung gibt hier für mich "Fußverkehr ist vorherschend" vor. Kannst du mehr ausführen, warum du m... commented 2026-09-24 17:07:53 UTC by Jbah ♦54 |
| 187107947 (Comments: 3) | acubens71 (Discussed changesets: 19) | En regardant de nouveau le wiki et les discussions sur le forum OSM qui avaient pu me guider par le passé... peut-être que j'avais mal compris un truc effectivement. Je ferai plus attention à l'avenir à ajouter le... commented 2026-09-24 17:06:01 UTC by acubens71 ♦53 |
| 189499461 (Comments: 3) | Philip Waldman (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke.. maar foot=yes is default op wegen. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-24 17:05:48 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
 | 189206467 (Comments: 1) | Русланкз (Discussed changesets: 3) | Вообщето уже расчистили местами и сносят частный сектор . Алимбек Улан ролик сделал commented 2026-09-24 16:57:28 UTC by Русланкз ♦2 |
| 179496033 (Comments: 1) | pxlframes (Discussed changesets: 4) | Moin, ich habe hier eine Note erstellt zum gesammelten Austausch zum Thema bicycle=no: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5537450 commented 2026-09-24 16:56:54 UTC by Jbah ♦54 |
| 179495390 (Comments: 1) | pxlframes (Discussed changesets: 4) | Moin, ich habe hier eine Note erstellt zum gesammelten Austausch zum Thema bicycle=no: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5537450 commented 2026-09-24 16:56:50 UTC by Jbah ♦54 |
| 179496124 (Comments: 1) | pxlframes (Discussed changesets: 4) | Moin, ich habe hier eine Note erstellt zum gesammelten Austausch zum Thema bicycle=no: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5537450 commented 2026-09-24 16:56:47 UTC by Jbah ♦54 |
| 182843042 (Comments: 1) | pxlframes (Discussed changesets: 4) | Moin, ich habe hier eine Note erstellt zum gesammelten Austausch zum Thema bicycle=no: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5537450 commented 2026-09-24 16:56:40 UTC by Jbah ♦54 |
| 186641012 (Comments: 2) | rle32795 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Changed it now 🙂 commented 2026-09-24 16:52:52 UTC by rle32795 ♦46 |
| 189421768 (Comments: 2) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 18) | Please also check that you're not accidentally reusing previous, irrelevant changeset comments. This edit obviously didn't add any houses. commented 2026-09-24 16:51:05 UTC by extraordinarymachine ♦4 |
| 189500623 (Comments: 1) | Jancini (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Jancini, Het stond hier al op motor_vehicle=destination. Wanneer het verboden toegang is dan is access=private voldoende. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-24 16:49:06 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 176300742 (Comments: 2) | Axelos (Discussed changesets: 35) | Bonjour, Je n’ai pas ou plus de photo, en revanche il y a eu de la communication locale sur le fait que la porte est réservée aux piétons et cyclistes :https://c.estrepublicain.fr/transport/2025/11/17/circulation-la-... commented 2026-09-24 16:48:25 UTC by Axelos ♦119 |
| 189507285 (Comments: 1) | benny22222 (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #189507733 Welkom bij OSM, Wat is hier de bedoeling van? Je bent daadwerkelijk iets aan het aanpassen op de wereldkaart. Je edits zijn teruggedraaid. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-24 16:45:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189249910 (Comments: 3) | chimchimchim (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries, I understand it’s easy to get carried away when editing! Happy to answer any questions or clarify on the points above. Happy editing :) commented 2026-09-24 16:42:35 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,120 |
| 733654 (Comments: 2) | alexrudd (Discussed changesets: 1) | It has since been changed to ref=* . A lot of streams in this area seem to have been imported with such tags in the name and there's been people moving some of them (not all) to ref. commented 2026-09-24 16:35:19 UTC by I-76 ♦86 |
| 189469561 (Comments: 1) | Stanislav_1988 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Спутниковые снимки Google не являются допустимым источником для OSM. За их использование откатывают пакеты правок и навешиваю блокировки, б... commented 2026-09-24 16:11:26 UTC by luiswoo ♦604 |
| 189504427 (Comments: 2) | Peter Brodersen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thank you for mentioning the problems. I am sorry I didn't catch them myself. The script failed whenever a place was specifically noted with the origin of the name being unknown. I have fixed this edge case which I unfortunately didn'... commented 2026-09-24 16:08:39 UTC by Peter Brodersen ♦16 |
| 182616543 (Comments: 2) | LUKy_BB (Discussed changesets: 4) | Diky za upresnenie ;-) commented 2026-09-24 16:01:33 UTC by LUKy_BB ♦5 |
| 189496524 (Comments: 1) | Skywave (Discussed changesets: 33) | Er staat nergens dat het niet mag daar!? Dat het een krappe bocht is maakt het nog niet verboden... commented 2026-09-24 15:55:26 UTC by Rubenke ♦56 |
| 189501085 (Comments: 1) | Istvan Kasler (Discussed changesets: 8) | Aeh - auch das ist quatsch - das mit der restriction würde für straßen in eine relation gehören. Und einen "u_turn" kann ein Gleisgebundenes Fahrzeug ja gar nicht machen. Ich würde empfehlen du fragst mal be... commented 2026-09-24 15:53:35 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 189491053 (Comments: 1) | Der Max - Radlwerkstatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus, die Radlwerkstatt hatte ich bereits eingetragen (Node 14175884052). Du hast die Daten nochmals an Node 12751900915 eingetragen, was überflüssig ist. Ich habe diesen Node als Adress-Node erstellt damit das Gebäude spä... commented 2026-09-24 15:52:06 UTC by martinst ♦416 |
| 189496289 (Comments: 1) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | Sorry to hijack this, but I would really like some input from the lyft team on something that requires newer imagery (both aerial and especially street level) than I currently have access to, as per https://go-ggi.com/northbound-i-95-exit-ramp-to-s-r... commented 2026-09-24 15:39:37 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 189498671 (Comments: 1) | Elenainciviel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Een steiger dat zou kunnen. Een naam heeft ie vast niet. bicycle motor_vehicle, paarden op deze steiger. Dat zal toch n... commented 2026-09-24 15:37:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 186998903 (Comments: 5) | Titi72 T (Discussed changesets: 11) | Merci de m'avoir répondu ! It's cool ! J'ai effectivement trouvé grâce à votre explication toute simple ! Un simple petit détail technique qui fait toute la différence : en effet : &q... commented 2026-09-24 15:31:28 UTC by Titi72 T ♦8 |
| 189328279 (Comments: 4) | Petró Tamás (Discussed changesets: 24) | köszi szépen! :) commented 2026-09-24 15:29:47 UTC by Petró Tamás ♦19 |
| 189439754 (Comments: 3) | 511 keV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Well done! commented 2026-09-24 15:29:34 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,080 |
| 189466707 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Trocou ref=SB-51 por ref=BR-493 numa estrada, mas a BR-493 fica em outro lugar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4002780). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18946... commented 2026-09-24 15:26:30 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 189463669 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Trocou highway=path (caminho informal ligando os extremos finais das ruas, para roteamento pedestre) por waterway=stream (córrego), mas não há córrego algum ali. --- ... commented 2026-09-24 15:22:57 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
 | 188768212 (Comments: 4) | Kharandesert (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the question! Vantor Imagery is just like the other imagery layers, only privately owned and typically updated more frequently. commented 2026-09-24 15:20:41 UTC by Kharandesert ♦2 |
| 188476903 (Comments: 3) | Patrick Grote (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke! Ich hatte die 33 vorhin wieder ergänzt aber habe sie nun entfernt. Danke auch nochmal für deine Beiträge hier in OSM – falls du Fragen hast, kannst du dich gern jederzeit bei mir oder anderen Mappern melden! ... commented 2026-09-24 15:19:42 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦467 |
| 189319820 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Adicionou construction=secondary a uma via que não é highway=construction. A via não está interditada. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189... commented 2026-09-24 15:14:04 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 189305213 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Este changeset adicionou access=no, bloqueando o roteamento pela BR-101 entre Ibiraçu e João Neiva, mas o trecho não esteve bloqueado por período prolongado nos últimos dias. No dia 20, esteve bloqueada ... commented 2026-09-24 15:07:45 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 114191932 (Comments: 5) | gymko (Discussed changesets: 30) | Jj, navigovať chodcov to bude, ale možno niektoré navigácie si vyberú trasu pre chodcov po ceste, ak by na nej zostala informácia sidewalk:right. commented 2026-09-24 15:03:19 UTC by Tomas_J ♦418 |
| 189366434 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Changes look good, the source tag is useful but could be potentially more specific as 'list_of_streets' doesn't actually tell me much. Maybe link to a website or alike? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-09-24 15:02:59 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189175671 (Comments: 1) | Win32netsky (Discussed changesets: 27) | Die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21406161 will wohl eine Route sein ("tpe"="route") und kein Multipolygon. commented 2026-09-24 15:02:17 UTC by kartler175 ♦587 |
| 189498240 (Comments: 1) | Christine Soboyede (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for requesting a review on this changeset. I've unfortunately had to revert this change but please don't let that put you off contributing to OSM. `highway=footway` was the correct tagging here and... commented 2026-09-24 15:00:56 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189500946 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | All of the tags look good! If it houses the library but is not only one you could add a separate node for the library itself? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2026-09-24 14:54:14 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189229596 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | A "Lagoa" do Tatu é uma enseada dentro da Lagoa Feia, não uma lagoa separada. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagoa_Feia --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189... commented 2026-09-24 14:54:13 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 88494939 (Comments: 4) | Snailex (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ha legközelebb arra járok, akkor a Kaputól délre a Sárvíz utca felől megnézem a két ösvényt, hogy meddig lehet felmenni. Köszi. commented 2026-09-24 14:52:40 UTC by nyulzer ♦1 |
| 189501176 (Comments: 2) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Leaving a comment under the changeset so people know it is wrong is the correct way to deal with getting the changeset comment incorrect! Thank you for adding these details! I've updated the `contact:facebook=*` to the URL for their profi... commented 2026-09-24 14:52:22 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 178598448 (Comments: 5) | Edawyt3425 (Discussed changesets: 25) | poprawiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.673552/19.202058 ale obawiam że jest więcej do poprawy w okolicy commented 2026-09-24 14:52:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 179744223 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 107) | Hei, olitko minkä perusteella muuttanut mm. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130252077 ja https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130252071 footwaysta serviceksi? Kyseessä on max 2 m leveät käytävät, joista ei kyllä auto... commented 2026-09-24 14:51:04 UTC by kartoittaa ♦15 |
| 182773990 (Comments: 11) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 28) | For the record, I do not agree with the followup changeset, but have chosen to not do any followups. commented 2026-09-24 14:50:10 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189027190 (Comments: 2) | Fidelis Assis (Discussed changesets: 46) | Olá! Apenas etiquetas do IBGE enviadas por engano. Já removidas. Obrigado pelo aviso. commented 2026-09-24 14:44:19 UTC by Fidelis Assis ♦56 |
| 189499652 (Comments: 1) | yitimox (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bu düzenlemeyi yüklerken tarayıcım çöktü. Bundan dolayı aynı isimde 2 değişiklik kaydı açılmış. ID Editör'ün verdiği hataları gidersem de mükerrer ya da geometriye aykırı çizi... commented 2026-09-24 14:34:09 UTC by yitimox ♦45 |
| 189501552 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | The comment regarding local library is not correct for this building, but I don't see how to delete it. commented 2026-09-24 14:28:30 UTC by guy4159 ♦4 |
| 182834321 (Comments: 2) | kartoittaa (Discussed changesets: 9) | Piti olla Aug 31-Sep 14 - elokuun numero oli jostain syystä jäänyt pois. Päivitin tämän nyt, kiitos huomiosta! :) commented 2026-09-24 14:27:43 UTC by kartoittaa ♦15 |
| 188968350 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | This is "minimumly" correct. We have Choi Ha Road entire stretch should be tertiary, which justifies half of the changeset. Then, given that Choi Ha Road is not ending at the junction, it's strange to have a junction where every... commented 2026-09-24 14:19:12 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189458537 (Comments: 1) | Waxahachie GIS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the fix! Happy mapping commented 2026-09-24 14:18:42 UTC by citrula ♦1,017 |
| 189489927 (Comments: 2) | tobych (Discussed changesets: 18) | LordGarySugar you wanted more buildings mapped here, and this changeset maps buildings - so it's as good as your work in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164436991 commented 2026-09-24 14:11:47 UTC by LivingWithDragons ♦60 |
| 189240918 (Comments: 1) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 33) | Zdroj? Co je "urttri"? commented 2026-09-24 14:10:09 UTC by Piskvor ♦518 |
| 189288995 (Comments: 1) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 33) | Popis. "gjh" neni nic. commented 2026-09-24 14:09:12 UTC by Piskvor ♦518 |
| 187450809 (Comments: 1) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 39) | Absolutly incorrect settlement. Correct one is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3867429 commented 2026-09-24 14:08:52 UTC by fserges ♦58 |
| 189340048 (Comments: 1) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 33) | Zdroj, popis? commented 2026-09-24 14:08:35 UTC by Piskvor ♦518 |
| 189499833 (Comments: 1) | Írisz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv. Magyarországon rajzoláshoz a legújabb FÖMI (2015 vagy 2016) réteget szoktuk használni. Bár régiek, de 20-40 cm pontosak, ezért hűen tükrözik a valóságot a... commented 2026-09-24 14:00:16 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189449927 (Comments: 1) | PetrazzoPaola (Discussed changesets: 5) | Anche quì uguale, è stato applicato il cambio del nome sull'elemento geografico relativo alla linea di demarcazione fra Comuni, non sulla highway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2026-09-24 13:59:35 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 189450114 (Comments: 1) | PetrazzoPaola (Discussed changesets: 5) | attenzione che il "name" lo hai applicato al confine Comunale e non sulla highway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189450114 commented 2026-09-24 13:58:40 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 189499003 (Comments: 1) | peter_dedo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, Tesco je už samotná budova. Bod navyše teda v tomto prípade nie je nutný. commented 2026-09-24 13:56:30 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,127 |
| 188811624 (Comments: 3) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 34) | Thank you for your reply. commented 2026-09-24 13:50:03 UTC by mariem_mohamed ♦7 |
| 152501249 (Comments: 2) | Filip009 (Discussed changesets: 77) | Okej, budem si pamätať. commented 2026-09-24 13:47:13 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,127 |
| 155468386 (Comments: 5) | Filip009 (Discussed changesets: 77) | Myslím, že to bolo preto, lebo v Tabuľkách Traťových Pomerov sa píše, že je to priecestie na ceste tretej triedy. commented 2026-09-24 13:46:22 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,127 |
| 187265525 (Comments: 4) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 524) | Bonjour, non désolé, je n'ai pas eu la raison des deux siret, la personne n'avait pas l'info. Bonne journée commented 2026-09-24 13:44:31 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦344 |
| 189496384 (Comments: 2) | TFrank52 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also I was discussing this with another mapper, and it sounds like what you spotted here might be and LVT tower rather than an ALPR (https://www.lvt.com) commented 2026-09-24 13:37:16 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦41 |
| 189493372 (Comments: 1) | Marcahaya Manalu (Discussed changesets: 1) | kebun sawit gunakan landuse=orchard atau "Kebun Buah" dalam aplikasi iD editor commented 2026-09-24 13:22:03 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189496652 (Comments: 1) | David Wyn (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi David, I'm assuming you've removed the Wikidata tag as it prevented you from editing the name. Please don't do this. If you scroll down, there's a little table where you can edit fields and keep the tag. I've... commented 2026-09-24 13:21:50 UTC by ceirios ♦148 |
| 189496838 (Comments: 1) | BAHARI SABURAI (Discussed changesets: 2) | Jangan lupa berikan judul suntingannya, daripada simbol strip saja "-" commented 2026-09-24 13:21:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189222417 (Comments: 3) | oppoopopoo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Den "Sportplatz" gelöscht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189498310. Ich vermute das Mapping steht in Zusammenhang mit diesem Schild: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.659163338178985&lng=6.408250210812639&z=... commented 2026-09-24 13:19:05 UTC by aixbrick ♦940 |
| 189498182 (Comments: 1) | miksuko (Discussed changesets: 4) | I'm automatically updating operator:wikidata, operator:wikipedia, brand:wikidata, brand, etc values programmatically. sorry for bad changeset title commented 2026-09-24 13:16:54 UTC by miksuko ♦6 |
| 189149413 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Este changeset removeu ref=CA-169 de uma estrada rural. O código estava correto e consta no mapa 4 do plano diretor de 2020. commented 2026-09-24 13:12:48 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 188311387 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 524) | Sorry, the node I was referring to was the "Camping Paradis" one. It has since been modified and merged into a way, but the original node was never deleted. Have a good day commented 2026-09-24 13:08:25 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦344 |
| 185985161 (Comments: 1) | gvwaal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi there 👋 You created some speed cameras here and in some other changesets (I see 14 around Minneapolis: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2x0D) But I’m not sure highway=speed_camera is quite the right fit for them. My understanding... commented 2026-09-24 13:02:28 UTC by scrambling_panda ♦24 |
| 98456533 (Comments: 5) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 122) | Ich sehe da in Luftaufnahmen nichts. Dann nehme ich wohl lieber den Tunnelplan des Bunkers und lösche dieses Viereck. Danke :) commented 2026-09-24 12:53:27 UTC by pietz ♦7 |
| 189341396 (Comments: 2) | oppoopopoo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, ich bezweifle, dass das ein noch existierendes Geschäft ist. Wicküler war übrigens mal eine Biermarke und ist daher sicherlich nicht der operator. Gruß commented 2026-09-24 12:51:46 UTC by aixbrick ♦940 |
| 188909733 (Comments: 6) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 130) | Ich habe das disused-Präfix von den genannten Wegen mittlerweile entfernt. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5259331 commented 2026-09-24 12:44:11 UTC by george1201 ♦342 |
 | 134631841 (Comments: 1) | NFZANMNIM (Discussed changesets: 157) | Garaşsyzlyk District (capital: Andalyp (formerly Ýylanly)) and Gubadag District have also been restored at the same time (2025). Their old borders seem to be only available on this old map https://taryhturkmen.blogspot.com/2016/09/turkmenista... commented 2026-09-24 12:43:55 UTC by Well203 ♦2 |
| 189422860 (Comments: 4) | george1201 (Discussed changesets: 46) | It's a designated hiking trail. The guidepost n442385873 indicates a hiking route in this direction. The way is part of the hiking relation r13154404. commented 2026-09-24 12:40:18 UTC by george1201 ♦342 |
| 184411785 (Comments: 1) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 52) | Pantas saja aneh sekali klasifikasi jalan di Surakarta ini banyak jalan sekunder commented 2026-09-24 12:31:37 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189485413 (Comments: 1) | soundchaser (Discussed changesets: 21) | здесь прям действительно стоматологическая больница, куда госпитализируют? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561929171 commented 2026-09-24 12:22:46 UTC by literan ♦7,236 |
| 186716958 (Comments: 2) | Lachgast (Discussed changesets: 56) | Ha die Peewee! Wat fijn dat je mijn werk even gecheckt hebt. Ik zag een duidelijke verdieping in de ahn5, maar wellicht iets dat ooit in een ver verleden iets is geweest. Ik kon het me ook niet heugen van de fietstochtjes daar, maar het geheugen i... commented 2026-09-24 12:19:32 UTC by Lachgast ♦142 |
| 189490204 (Comments: 1) | Istvan Kasler (Discussed changesets: 8) | Moin, also highway=turning_circle ist ein wendehammer am ende von straßen. Das hier sieht ziemlich kaputt aus. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle Flo commented 2026-09-24 12:19:29 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 189061225 (Comments: 4) | maps11 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Erick, las modificaciones se basan debido al uso del acceso al aeropuerto en más de una oportunidad en los últimos 60 días. Quienes apoyamos este proyecto, intentamos hacer lo mejor posible, tanto vos como yo. No se basa exclusiv... commented 2026-09-24 12:10:14 UTC by maps11 ♦1 |
| 189485441 (Comments: 1) | Moustafa ELkomy (Discussed changesets: 1) | رجاءً لا تضف أشياء ليست في الخريطة أو أشياء خاطئة. شكرًا جزيًلا. commented 2026-09-24 12:07:55 UTC by Growebis ♦24 |
| 189400849 (Comments: 10) | amp87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sieht gut aus! Der Innenhof ist wenn ich es richtig verstanden habe nicht Teil des Gebäudes, den könnte man noch weg nehmen und ggf. als Garten-/Grünfläche taggen. Aber sonst super. Ja, Eigenname würde ich lassen, der ist ... commented 2026-09-24 12:03:04 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189451434 (Comments: 5) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 524) | Nous avons regardé dans le wiki ou était la mention branch dans : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3025542 Est ce qu'on a un endroit ou peut supprimer cette suggestion qui est fausse du coup ? Merci d'avance commented 2026-09-24 12:02:57 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦344 |
| 189494017 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 188) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561958983 и другата подобна наблизо ги писах стени, а не огради. В основата си са като стени. commented 2026-09-24 11:53:49 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 189361188 (Comments: 1) | andreberger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189493942 commented 2026-09-24 11:51:34 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189117076 (Comments: 2) | Volker Kerkhoff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, what's the source of the coordinates? At least the coordinates for repeater ED5YAH (node 14185228499) on your changeset are off by over 1 Km. commented 2026-09-24 11:46:50 UTC by Antonio Eugenio Burriel ♦39 |
| 189473543 (Comments: 1) | mikotiwa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, what is your reasoning for this change? None of these streets have residences along them, and they seem to mostly fit the definition at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified (notably, the tag does *not* mean the roa... commented 2026-09-24 11:43:38 UTC by willkmis ♦231 |
| 189468711 (Comments: 1) | MonsieurSloth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Unfortunately this change glued an admin boundary to the bridge you added. I've fixed this now. Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMC... commented 2026-09-24 11:43:37 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189478951 (Comments: 1) | nachobrz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios. El etiquetado para mí está bien. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración tenemos un foro y un canal de telegram donde podés contactarte con la ... commented 2026-09-24 11:37:54 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189489233 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 121) | :) commented 2026-09-24 11:24:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 183193137 (Comments: 1) | AeonicB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check/correct: highway=0 !? (node 13881308468) Thx in advance. commented 2026-09-24 11:23:31 UTC by Ropino ♦429 |
| X | 189395102 (Comments: 1) | FreDorian-3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Usually not a good idea to edit across two different countries in the same changeset. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189395102 commented 2026-09-24 11:21:41 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189393897 (Comments: 2) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Removed the `phone=*` key as well and updated the building to `building=commercial`. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189492064 All of the edits you made were good though. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-09-24 11:18:13 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189393844 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Change looks good! Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189393844 commented 2026-09-24 11:15:34 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 123443212 (Comments: 2) | scarapella (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello. Happily this is a gravel quarry not a grave quarry. And for that matter I hope the practice of mining graves (e.g. for Mummy Brown https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy_brown) is solidly in our collective past. fixed via: https://www.op... commented 2026-09-24 11:11:57 UTC by scarapella ♦65 |
| 189376401 (Comments: 3) | DodaBettaMountain (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. No worries. Thanks for the response. It would be nice if some of you could be in the Chilean chat on Telegram, accessible via the link in my bio, to have a more direct conversation when this happens. We don´t mind correcting something... commented 2026-09-24 11:10:54 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189352658 (Comments: 4) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 84) | Hi, I edited the location, have a nice day. commented 2026-09-24 11:10:33 UTC by Kookykooky ♦54 |
| 189487587 (Comments: 1) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 29) | Please make sure to split terraces into their individual buildings, it's not very useful if houses are clumped together like this and is extra work for other editors later down the line when they want to add addresses and have to split them. Tha... commented 2026-09-24 11:06:32 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦388 |
| 185537766 (Comments: 1) | Aberhangie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you possibly tell me what the source of the name "Jane's Hill" is? I can't find reference to it online. commented 2026-09-24 10:48:43 UTC by andrum99 ♦25 |
| 189400189 (Comments: 1) | Nyzthie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for adding these details to the map! From what I can tell this change looks good! Seems like @Ayyayo has already added opening hours using street complete as well so you're already helping others to survey! ... commented 2026-09-24 10:47:25 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189403496 (Comments: 1) | sleet2412 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Just been reviewing this changeset, ended up making some changes to what you've done but generally this changeset is good: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189490016 A few small notes, try to be a little more descriptive in ... commented 2026-09-24 10:43:56 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 166348657 (Comments: 1) | XrAnna (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, thx for contributing, but sorry, I'm going to delete and remap all buildings here, their skewed geometry you added is just not correct :( commented 2026-09-24 10:36:45 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦418 |
| 189364155 (Comments: 1) | Xom9k_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14204439901/history to nijak nie jest shop=hardware that is not shop=hardware at all, right? what you tried to add here? commented 2026-09-24 10:28:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189459615 (Comments: 1) | bigarcia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your consistent contributions to the project! 🥳 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189459615 commented 2026-09-24 10:26:54 UTC by GOwin ♦900 |
| 189387944 (Comments: 4) | Car Tographer (Discussed changesets: 8) | Had a trawl through Instagram. Be-Rad took over ownership of the Kitesurf Centre in around Feb 2025 and held a closing-down sale in Pevensey Bay at the same time, so while I'm not clear why they have two distinct websites, I think you're ri... commented 2026-09-24 10:25:21 UTC by amosharper ♦63 |
| 164130691 (Comments: 7) | Paguro01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Appena ho rimosso altro duplicato. commented 2026-09-24 10:23:42 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦371 |
| 189484671 (Comments: 1) | ureilrey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Some sections of these mapped waterways are better tagged with waterway=canal + usage=irrigation. Please refer to the wiki for details. A rule of thumb for waterways: if you can jump across it, it's a stream. Please go over ... commented 2026-09-24 10:22:29 UTC by GOwin ♦900 |
| 189351501 (Comments: 1) | René mapsme (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189489232 commented 2026-09-24 10:22:22 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
 | 189487092 (Comments: 1) | Kasthoori09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | digitized some buildings in Pakistan commented 2026-09-24 10:21:41 UTC by Kasthoori09 ♦1 |
| 189466552 (Comments: 1) | Ktnwxlr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189406607 commented 2026-09-24 10:20:30 UTC by Luzandro ♦1,038 |
| 189484783 (Comments: 1) | Raf Carranza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good job. The vegetation is a good indicator that there's very likely a (small) waterway here. You can also use a topo map to confirm this from DEM contours. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Publish... commented 2026-09-24 10:18:33 UTC by GOwin ♦900 |
| 189414621 (Comments: 1) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 63) | Hallo fietswim Waar heb je de opening_hours vandaan? Op de website worden openingstijden vermeld op dinsdag tot en met zaterdag van 9 tot 5. commented 2026-09-24 10:14:50 UTC by Kees 59 ♦131 |
| 189484780 (Comments: 1) | jacobs_r (Discussed changesets: 8) | review_requested \tyes Hoi, Lijkt me aardig kloppen zo. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-24 10:11:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189363048 (Comments: 1) | Jason19991112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189488556 commented 2026-09-24 10:08:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189460625 (Comments: 1) | freshline (Discussed changesets: 1) | V depressing that this is now paid for but thank you for adding this information to the map! Also welcome to OSM! I've added Hooplr as the operator and added the operator:type as private as I saw you added `operator=private`. The `operato... commented 2026-09-24 10:05:40 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189487380 (Comments: 1) | RAVU-Voogsgerd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-24 10:04:59 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189462838 (Comments: 4) | matder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi , i will fix this soon, i live in this area and the coastline is totally wrong commented 2026-09-24 09:55:04 UTC by matder ♦1 |
| 189223269 (Comments: 2) | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (Discussed changesets: 58) | Bonjour! 1. Village des valeurs en anglais: mon erreur, correction automatique proposée par l'éditeur id via le preset id schema. Je vais corriger. 2. highway=crossing: ça fait l'objet de débats, ma... commented 2026-09-24 09:51:30 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦547 |
| 189487438 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 4) | Improved road connectivity based on Esri World Imagery #mapbox_missing_roads commented 2026-09-24 09:45:52 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦4 |
| 189388938 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 47) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189487298 commented 2026-09-24 09:42:34 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 157706097 (Comments: 2) | stadiaarcadia (Discussed changesets: 210) | Hi, both are fine if you ask me... commented 2026-09-24 09:35:17 UTC by stadiaarcadia ♦112 |
| 185188097 (Comments: 1) | tyroleanDave (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Dave, perfekt wäre es den helipad nicht zuerst zu löschen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185188173) und dann neu anzulegen, sondern die vorhandenen Daten weiter zu verwenden. Dann bliebe die Historie erhalten. commented 2026-09-24 09:33:50 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189359106 (Comments: 1) | Big Bubbles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189486863 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189486689 commented 2026-09-24 09:32:20 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 187459520 (Comments: 2) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 27) | Mistake, fixed it. commented 2026-09-24 09:14:04 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦64 |
 | 189370105 (Comments: 1) | Tzlegends (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189485544 commented 2026-09-24 09:06:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189440196 (Comments: 1) | Sibaikun (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, simbol untuk asal dan tujuan adalah en-dash: – Jadi contohnya: Jalan Raya Salatiga–Boyolali commented 2026-09-24 09:06:16 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189376010 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189485523 commented 2026-09-24 09:05:57 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189376321 (Comments: 1) | JoaoGrandao (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189484771 commented 2026-09-24 09:05:19 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189429693 (Comments: 3) | SambalPecelMadiun (Discussed changesets: 3) | sepertinya web kemarin bermasalah, sekarang sudah muncul preview gambarnya commented 2026-09-24 08:58:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189469645 (Comments: 3) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 22) | Makes sense! I ask not because I’m hoping you’d do all the mapping, rather that it would be nice to set a shared direction we can both move towards with whatever edits we make here in the future :) commented 2026-09-24 08:57:21 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,120 |
| 183059164 (Comments: 2) | rild leka (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello Anca! I was meant to make the change, so I apologise. Thank you for correcting the intersection. Best regards, Rild Leka. commented 2026-09-24 08:51:13 UTC by rild leka ♦6 |
| 189484509 (Comments: 1) | QNGUYE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Add trekking path following GPS traces. commented 2026-09-24 08:41:37 UTC by QNGUYE ♦1 |
| 187433087 (Comments: 4) | Константин Гам (Discussed changesets: 311) | Удалять тег не надо, но заменить значение на более подходящее почему нет. С глаз велосипедиста, казалось что тропа утеряна и дальше некуд... commented 2026-09-24 08:40:25 UTC by Константин Гам ♦784 |
| 189441547 (Comments: 2) | Tibery (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189484438 commented 2026-09-24 08:37:55 UTC by Colbertson ♦177 |
| 189479188 (Comments: 2) | Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (Discussed changesets: 19) | Volgens mij heeft dit geen negatieve invloed op hulpdiensten. Morgen is de wijziging doorgevoerd in LIVENAV en dan zal ik testen. commented 2026-09-24 08:36:12 UTC by Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) ♦12 |
| 189470862 (Comments: 1) | 23408710328 (Discussed changesets: 2) | It doesn't seem "real" at all. commented 2026-09-24 08:33:33 UTC by MarcoR ♦638 |
| 188713874 (Comments: 4) | therealzakie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for checking and correcting commented 2026-09-24 08:22:43 UTC by ⇄ john paul jones & gringo ♦37 |
| 189483225 (Comments: 1) | ancienthunter321 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! - And happy mapping. commented 2026-09-24 08:20:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,933 |
| 189446916 (Comments: 1) | Blase_Marshall89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Wherever 36 Belmont Street is, it is not in the middle of a service road. Addresses on Belmont Street and the Denton Estate could be better mapped, but that requires a survey. It is also extremely unlikely that... commented 2026-09-24 08:14:15 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,933 |
| 189380764 (Comments: 1) | John Joseph A Gatchalian (Discussed changesets: 61) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189483464 commented 2026-09-24 08:13:39 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 165368730 (Comments: 5) | archINFORM (Discussed changesets: 15) | I didn't see your second post about musem item Q20196262 right away. To me link to that Wikidata ID doesn't seem more suitable either. Statements in that item currently somewhat conflate the building and museum (organization) but it seems t... commented 2026-09-24 08:13:13 UTC by Pikse ♦250 |
| 189473236 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:12:33 UTC by Comino ♦408 |
| 189471237 (Comments: 1) | 23408710328 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Banque Bmo en Italie? Je pense que c'est peu probable. Il ne s'agit certainement pas d'un bâtiment! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2026-09-24 08:12:10 UTC by MarcoR ♦638 |
| 189473148 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:07:35 UTC by Comino ♦408 |
| 189470078 (Comments: 2) | ancienthunter321 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Appreciate the feedback, thank you - I have applied the recommendations now. commented 2026-09-24 08:05:40 UTC by ancienthunter321 ♦1 |
| 189473078 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:02:52 UTC by Comino ♦408 |
| 189399544 (Comments: 1) | davidjbd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189482921 commented 2026-09-24 07:57:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
 | 189387290 (Comments: 1) | Tatygul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189482749 commented 2026-09-24 07:53:52 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189472994 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 07:48:53 UTC by Comino ♦408 |
| 189453900 (Comments: 1) | jacobs_r (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag jacobs, Die ingetekende toegangsweg heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse forest. Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alt toets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen. Errgens rechts in het scherm (editmodus) kun je kiezen voor de BGT achtergron... commented 2026-09-24 07:47:19 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 187900457 (Comments: 2) | creativebeg (Discussed changesets: 7) | Meanwhile, the way has been changed to natural=water by changeset/189470970 . I'm not a local but I suspect that at least one of these changes is wrong. commented 2026-09-24 07:46:09 UTC by MarcoR ♦638 |
| 189428946 (Comments: 7) | Blip-blip (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great. Thank you for letting me know. Now I know how it works. commented 2026-09-24 07:43:25 UTC by Blip-blip ♦1 |
| 189456196 (Comments: 1) | truebluefoundation (Discussed changesets: 1) | Note: Google Maps is copyrighted, which means that directly sourcing information from there is prohibited. Tag names should be connected with underscores (_), instead of spaces ( ). commented 2026-09-24 07:17:31 UTC by Anonymous36863 ♦51 |
| 189363259 (Comments: 1) | rcmnt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189480251 commented 2026-09-24 07:15:56 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189371123 (Comments: 1) | SLin07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189478272 commented 2026-09-24 07:15:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
 | 189323807 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189477863 commented 2026-09-24 07:14:46 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189321390 (Comments: 1) | Yuri2001 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189477242 commented 2026-09-24 07:14:13 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189335463 (Comments: 1) | Done94 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189476965 commented 2026-09-24 07:13:35 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189372316 (Comments: 1) | Rog232 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189464002 commented 2026-09-24 07:12:58 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189329122 (Comments: 1) | Dertefter Labs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189463101 commented 2026-09-24 07:12:22 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189362396 (Comments: 1) | Ammergauer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189446401 commented 2026-09-24 07:11:51 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
 | 189345652 (Comments: 1) | newroyalads (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189444282 commented 2026-09-24 07:10:34 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 69235431 (Comments: 1) | Sint E7 (Discussed changesets: 61) | Bushaltes ´t Middeltje in Dussen op juiste locatie gezet. Fixme verwijderd. commented 2026-09-24 07:02:48 UTC by donux-nl ♦32 |
| 189350449 (Comments: 1) | Raul Candias (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189480832 commented 2026-09-24 07:01:58 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
 | 189411911 (Comments: 3) | kupitut (Discussed changesets: 1) | The edited object is the existing public building at вуліца Сяргея Ясеніна 17, but your changeset comment states that kupitut.by is at Бородинская 17. These are different locations. You also added the company name, websi... commented 2026-09-24 06:46:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
| 189443528 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 524) | Bonjour, Merci de votre alerte, nous avons supprimé le node en doublon suite à une erreur technique Cordialement, commented 2026-09-24 06:36:00 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦344 |
| 189473419 (Comments: 3) | MK Matthias (Discussed changesets: 1) | typo North of the lagoon... the wetland reedbed was intersecting. Please be very careful with the coastline commented 2026-09-24 06:34:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189321569 (Comments: 1) | Yuri2001 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189479399 commented 2026-09-24 06:31:32 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189367656 (Comments: 3) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 11) | I restored positions + tags of previous versions. Thanks for feedback! commented 2026-09-24 06:30:55 UTC by rumbrummer ♦19 |
| 189479854 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 71) | there was 2 ocean hills for the same neighborhood commented 2026-09-24 06:28:27 UTC by ieguy3 ♦72 |
| 189440918 (Comments: 2) | Voirie_3M (Discussed changesets: 14) | Tout à fait ! Le chantier a débuté commented 2026-09-24 06:27:16 UTC by Voirie_3M ♦25 |
| 188670246 (Comments: 1) | Thibaultmol (Discussed changesets: 34) | test commented 2026-09-24 06:19:56 UTC by Thibaultmol ♦66 |
| 189463633 (Comments: 1) | violette34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, j’ai remarqué que tu avais ajouté beaucoup d’images de bibliothèques avec Mapcomplete, c’est super ! Mais j’ai constaté que certaines ne sont que des captures d’écran de Fac... commented 2026-09-24 06:18:31 UTC by Thibaultmol ♦66 |
| 188762848 (Comments: 1) | Alban yolu (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Alban yolu, I have reverted this changeset to fix overlapping ways. Guido commented 2026-09-24 06:08:39 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 188890751 (Comments: 4) | Alban yolu (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Alban yolu, I have reverted this changeset to fix these issues. Guido commented 2026-09-24 06:04:32 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 189470120 (Comments: 2) | LittlePebble (Discussed changesets: 10) | Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189479175 commented 2026-09-24 06:04:28 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 188893582 (Comments: 2) | Alban yolu (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Alban yolu, I have reverted this changeset to fix these issues. Guido commented 2026-09-24 06:03:43 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 188893476 (Comments: 2) | Alban yolu (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Alban yolu, I have reverted this changeset to fix these issues. Guido commented 2026-09-24 06:02:53 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 188812454 (Comments: 2) | Alban yolu (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Alban yolu, i have reverted this changeset to fix these issues. Guido commented 2026-09-24 06:01:49 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 188862970 (Comments: 2) | Alban yolu (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Alban yolu, I have reverted this changeset to fix these issues. Guido commented 2026-09-24 05:59:53 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 184281209 (Comments: 2) | KonsPana81 (Discussed changesets: 7) | And I see that you already merged it, good, thank you. commented 2026-09-24 05:47:16 UTC by KonsPana81 ♦7 |
| 189333437 (Comments: 1) | Dead_0hlin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189478644 commented 2026-09-24 05:46:00 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189395819 (Comments: 1) | BZVPNR (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi BZVPNR, your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=15.54366&lat=-4.33295&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabri... commented 2026-09-24 05:42:58 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 189445709 (Comments: 2) | KonsPana81 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ahh, ok, good that you spot it, and you already merged it. Thank you. commented 2026-09-24 05:41:33 UTC by KonsPana81 ♦7 |
| 189333058 (Comments: 1) | Jival Kariya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189478274 commented 2026-09-24 05:31:42 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 187167929 (Comments: 1) | Danylo Mostovyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, original creator of the node here. Could I get some clarification regarding the purpose of its deletion? The device was present at the time that I added it to OSM. commented 2026-09-24 05:29:37 UTC by mappislandzuli ♦1 |
 | 189368502 (Comments: 1) | Antony Kaombe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189477946 commented 2026-09-24 05:20:01 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
 | 187796229 (Comments: 1) | Abdulali Noori (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Today I am adding features to the map in the city of Herat. I noticed that you added a hospital to the map (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1551310557), but it is not visible in the satellite imagery. Are you sure that a hospital is ac... commented 2026-09-24 05:10:03 UTC by solenoid jam ♦208 |
| 189357200 (Comments: 1) | Niel Mistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189477312 commented 2026-09-24 04:42:19 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189458752 (Comments: 1) | MrPuffelFisch (Discussed changesets: 1) | what's the purpose of adding line=no to the boundary ways? commented 2026-09-24 04:26:54 UTC by citrula ♦1,017 |
| 189459888 (Comments: 1) | Morgoate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Attention, mettre à jour des voies qui font parties de relations est difficile avec iD. Il doit y avoir plusieurs dizaines de relations route=bus de cassées. Pouvez-vous corriger ? Merci d'avance Marc commented 2026-09-24 04:22:25 UTC by mga_geo ♦346 |
| 189369632 (Comments: 1) | Joexme (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189476679 commented 2026-09-24 04:19:18 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189325171 (Comments: 1) | KyleOlie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189476740 commented 2026-09-24 04:06:11 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 188682116 (Comments: 2) | bybyge (Discussed changesets: 1) | 이 편집은 아무런 의미가 없어 보이기 때문에 지우도록 하겠습니다. 혹 객관적인 의미가 있다면 알려주시기 바랍니다. 아울러 원칙에 반하는 편집은 자칫 계정 정지 등의 제재가 있을 ... commented 2026-09-24 03:16:56 UTC by adreamy ♦66 |
| 189428778 (Comments: 5) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 47) | Just sent you a JOSM screenshot on Slack commented 2026-09-24 03:04:16 UTC by TheNightRider ♦84 |
| 189461745 (Comments: 1) | Tom Noogen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! For future reference, typically chain stores (Walmart, Safeway, Taco John's, etc.) don't include the city name in the name= field. Thanks! commented 2026-09-24 02:45:52 UTC by SD Mapman ♦99 |
| 189474703 (Comments: 1) | ESerapio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios. El etiquetado se ve bien para mí. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración tenemos un foro y un canal de telegram donde podés contactarte con la comuni... commented 2026-09-24 02:27:04 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189465079 (Comments: 1) | adrianpards94 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios. - Los nombres no se escriben todos con mayúscula. Por ejemplo "Red Maker" y "Comisaría de Mártires" serían mejores. |
| 188839782 (Comments: 1) | ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (Discussed changesets: 60) | This is the fifth time you delete the Amazigh name from Bani Walid (node/1160881649) — and the second time you do it after the formal warning of 26 August. The name:ber tag you keep deleting records a language that Libya's own Const... commented 2026-09-24 02:01:33 UTC by Libya-truth ♦24 |
| 189184891 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Não se usa highway=dummy, e o elemento comentado não está associado a uma relação de rota. commented 2026-09-24 01:52:31 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
 | 184542800 (Comments: 2) | Matija Nalis (Discussed changesets: 17) | Well, maybe it is, maybe it isn't -- that is the purpose of building=maybe afterall (see its wiki). We might know when new more detailed imagery comes online in few years, or if someone surveys it on the ground. In the meantime, it provid... commented 2026-09-24 01:49:54 UTC by Matija Nalis ♦143 |
| 189184691 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Inseriu ref=BR-286 em rodovias, mas não existe nenhuma rodovia no país com o código BR-286. commented 2026-09-24 01:49:47 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 189369963 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had a couple suggestions for you to improve your mapping in the future: * opening_hours=* for Bridges Nepal Cuisine and Midwest Family Outlet did not follow the va... commented 2026-09-24 01:45:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189184384 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Inseriu ref=BR-286 numa rodovia, mas não existe nenhuma rodovia no país com o código BR-286. commented 2026-09-24 01:44:50 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 189376276 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions here! I just had a few suggestions for you to improve your mapping in the future: * description=* and note=*, if used, should be strictly an objective description of the ... commented 2026-09-24 01:44:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189151180 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Inseriu ref=BR-286 numa rodovia, mas não existe nenhuma rodovia no país com o código BR-286. commented 2026-09-24 01:43:57 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 189376370 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had one suggestion for you to improve your mapping in the future: make sure to strip out any extra tracking junk out of URLs--the website=* for Jimbo Auto Service had a w... commented 2026-09-24 01:41:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189028224 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Vandalismo. Passarela não aparece em obras em nenhuma imagem aérea. commented 2026-09-24 01:18:01 UTC by ftrebien ♦316 |
| 189351703 (Comments: 1) | Ryand Kabul (Discussed changesets: 1) | kenapa semua sungai dijadikan goron-gorong? commented 2026-09-24 01:10:47 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189473515 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | A velocidade da via nesse trecho é de 60 km/h. commented 2026-09-24 01:05:22 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 186376040 (Comments: 1) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 14) | Don't use a descriptive name like "Former Rite-Aid" just leave it blank if it is currently vacant. commented 2026-09-24 00:51:11 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,101 |
| 189195360 (Comments: 1) | AndreaSchmidtCo (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-24 00:31:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189348397 (Comments: 1) | Dslrocks10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had a suggestion for you to improve your mapping in the future: Specifically. opening_hours=* did not follow the valid syntax, Ww-Ww HH:MM-HH:MM (e.g. Mo-Fr 09:00-17:... commented 2026-09-24 00:30:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 181487805 (Comments: 1) | Jan Rüter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Da du hier den Namen geändert hast, könntest du vielleicht in die Fragen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3552318 beantworten? Momentan ist hier noch irgendetwas durcheinander. commented 2026-09-24 00:19:29 UTC by LingM ♦19 |
| 189472242 (Comments: 1) | OSMthechallenger (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please try to keep your edits reduced to one small geographic area at a time. This changeset contains edits spread over the entirity of western and central europe. commented 2026-09-24 00:08:06 UTC by Thomasje ♦5 |
| 189036451 (Comments: 6) | vngx32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | w128011127 Hard to tell on aerial imagery, but with the latest mapillary images in the area you can zoom in at the southern part of this way and see that it says "Bike Lane" even though on aerial it looks like a regular sidewalk. If you ... commented 2026-09-23 23:56:57 UTC by HolyCrapThatsALongUsername ♦13 |
| 189464252 (Comments: 1) | Matt Gatti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2026-09-23 23:32:57 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 189392314 (Comments: 1) | Dmytro Golova (Discussed changesets: 1) | В плане плакат? Тут офис компании или каком плакате речь? commented 2026-09-23 22:50:43 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,763 |
| 189372339 (Comments: 1) | stefvanschie (Discussed changesets: 4) | En alle routerelaties die je vernield hebt, zijn weer gerepareerd. commented 2026-09-23 22:45:03 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,588 |
| 189422163 (Comments: 2) | therealmate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Ráraktam a ref címkét az épületekre, ahogy kérted. A name-t meghagytam, mert ezek az épület nevei szerintem, mindenki így hivatkozik rájuk, és a többi egyetemeken ... commented 2026-09-23 22:41:58 UTC by therealmate ♦1 |
| 189448084 (Comments: 6) | donlaser (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok, gracias, pero hay alguna evidencia de que sea 100 en todos esos tramos o está solo completando con 100 lo que falta? commented 2026-09-23 22:09:46 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 177930015 (Comments: 1) | droopy66 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Attention, les panneaux sur les autoroutes sont des highway=traffic_sign + traffic_sign=*, pas des information=board / guidepost. commented 2026-09-23 22:07:32 UTC by fgouget ♦125 |
| 189459112 (Comments: 1) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Looks really good! I noticed that on https://indoorequal.org/#map=18.6/39.6302304/-77.6693418&level=0 the women's bathroom isn't showing up. I believe this is because it is missing a level=0 tag. commented 2026-09-23 22:05:44 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦17 |
| 189470837 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | No Trecho da PRF o limite de velocidaade foi alterado para 40km/h, conforme as imagens no Google Street View: https://www.google.com/maps/@-20.2132852,-42.6570943,3a,75y,152.69h,81.79t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sSaU19_9sOPsOFc-9kg259g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstre... commented 2026-09-23 22:05:32 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189467364 (Comments: 1) | millstonebarn (Discussed changesets: 1) | @millstonebarn: What are you trying to do here? A majority of your edits contain some removal of information from speed cameras (guised as the creation thereof, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189418895) and the deletion of enforcement re... commented 2026-09-23 22:00:47 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 185695274 (Comments: 4) | Peter-OG-C (Discussed changesets: 1) | ... commented 2026-09-23 21:44:49 UTC by DeFra85 ♦301 |
| 141445342 (Comments: 1) | Narušiteľ (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zdravim, preco usek cesty 1227 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96809649 uz nie je cestou III. triedy? commented 2026-09-23 21:13:28 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 114586397 (Comments: 1) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 169) | Zaujimave, ze z wikidata sa da zistit cislo cesty (1225) a ci je usek tertiary alebo tertiary_link. commented 2026-09-23 21:04:44 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 158904933 (Comments: 1) | JuliaForgac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, why are pedestrians forbidden on these roads? What is the traffic sign there? commented 2026-09-23 21:01:21 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 189419574 (Comments: 3) | Jordi MF (Discussed changesets: 104) | Acabo de passar per davant i, efectivament, està tancat. No ho sabia. commented 2026-09-23 20:59:41 UTC by Sandal man ♦412 |
| 189437722 (Comments: 3) | Stefan177 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Jau. Am PC auf osm.org gehen und einloggen. Dann auf den Punkt zoomen und anschließend oben im Fenster auf "Bearbeiten" klicken. Objekt auswählen, namen löschen. Speichern (rechts oben). Mit CoMaps: Montag, ... commented 2026-09-23 20:57:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189466446 (Comments: 3) | SaymonN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Prawdopodobnie zdążyłeś już zajrzeć na mapę i spróbować odnaleźć swoją ulicę. Być może nie jest ona odwzorowana idealnie lub brakuje jej fragmentów. Może brakuje na niej sklepów czy restauracji, a może w ogó... commented 2026-09-23 20:54:00 UTC by Zwyklak ♦17 |
| 189197227 (Comments: 3) | easytolp (Discussed changesets: 2) | спасибо! commented 2026-09-23 20:48:13 UTC by 4004 ♦1,959 |
 | 189466886 (Comments: 1) | Tajik1212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Названия село в 2021 году был изменён commented 2026-09-23 20:42:30 UTC by Tajik1212 ♦1 |
| 189341069 (Comments: 5) | OSMphil (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi again, going through them from N to S (France only): - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5298092377 Features like a water_well should not have an addr:housenumber=* or other addr: tags - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/142... commented 2026-09-23 20:36:49 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189436544 (Comments: 4) | Kodeks50 (Discussed changesets: 2) | К сообщению отliteran лайк "палец вверх" поставил Zkir, что определяю как поддержку мнения, выраженного предыдущим комментатором Пока ... commented 2026-09-23 20:32:04 UTC by Kodeks50 ♦1 |
| 189459537 (Comments: 2) | Cibermarin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por el comentario, seré más cuidadoso. commented 2026-09-23 20:29:45 UTC by Cibermarin ♦1 |
| 189458384 (Comments: 1) | farlander (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag farlander. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-23 20:29:40 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189467865 (Comments: 1) | Sander R (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Sander, Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode . ....Anders krijg je twee identieke adressen. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-23 20:27:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189466057 (Comments: 1) | philbow16 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not map duplicate buildings, 6 Carter Avenue was already mapped here. commented 2026-09-23 20:19:34 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
 | 188865120 (Comments: 5) | 5mister7 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Feel free to change the relation how you want. Also i think you should keep the roads in Kosovo up-to-date since many of them are still categorized as M-# Best regards commented 2026-09-23 20:07:34 UTC by 5mister7 ♦19 |
| 188551376 (Comments: 2) | Qzeyy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, eklemiş olduğum binaları belediye kayıtlarında kapı numaralarından destek alarak ekledim. Bing Maps Aerial hiç kullanmadım. Bazı binalarda sıkıntı olabileceği bende tahin etmiştim o nokta ilçenin yeni gelişen b&... commented 2026-09-23 20:05:04 UTC by Qzeyy ♦1 |
| 189465063 (Comments: 2) | banderas191 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola marcmarti, Soy consciente de esa normativa, pero sin ánimo de entrar en polémicas legales, ya que no es el lugar adecuado, existe una amplia comunidad de ciclistas de montaña que, siempre bajo su propia responsabilid... commented 2026-09-23 20:02:27 UTC by banderas191 ♦3 |
| 184081794 (Comments: 1) | BABA BOBA (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-09-23 20:01:22 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,763 |
| 145651052 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 207) | Първите 2 посочени със сигурност не са в една сграда с "Бабино село". Слагам fixme. commented 2026-09-23 19:58:13 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 153869884 (Comments: 1) | Dudutazo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola . Son casas separadas, se tienen que dibujar separadas para agregar la dirección por separado. No dejarlas separadas por una coma. Saludos commented 2026-09-23 19:45:34 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 188619980 (Comments: 3) | Truthahnblatt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bilgilendirmeniz için teşekkür ederim. Telegram grubunda adı geçen meşhur "Ahmet Sağır"ın gazabı buymuş demek ki :) İncelenmesi üzere raporluyorum. commented 2026-09-23 19:29:09 UTC by yitimox ♦45 |
| 189459119 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 313) | Był w tym miejscu, ale już od paru lat nie istnieje w tym miejscu. Do zmiany nie mam zastrzeżeń. commented 2026-09-23 19:25:54 UTC by JakubC ♦5 |
| 189461934 (Comments: 1) | Agnes Petro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Agnes Petro, I came across your edits West of the Morogoro area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6309321577, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14185829242 and was curious about the motorway classifications you are using in this area. ... commented 2026-09-23 19:22:53 UTC by Hightide10 ♦14 |
| 172567832 (Comments: 3) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 23) | Tamamdır, rahatsızlık verdiğim için özür dilerim 👋 commented 2026-09-23 19:21:18 UTC by yitimox ♦45 |
| 189448741 (Comments: 1) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 211) | Danke commented 2026-09-23 19:20:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189448276 (Comments: 1) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 211) | Das Thema wurde dir im Forum sehr anders nahegelegt und du machst hier ungerührt weiter... commented 2026-09-23 19:19:21 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189465527 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Avenida Bispo Dom João da Mata se classifica como via arterial, por isso o limite de velocidade é de 60 km/h se não tiver nenhuma placa! commented 2026-09-23 19:09:09 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189403996 (Comments: 2) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 153) | Maybe the entire object is extra. I forgot. commented 2026-09-23 19:04:03 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,050 |
| 189463013 (Comments: 3) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 23) | Merhabalar, benimde pek bir fikrim yok, 13 yıl önce açılmış. bölgesel bir tanımdan yola çıkmışlardır. bahsettiğiniz yöntem de olabilir, ana istasyonlar arası (söğütlüçeşme-zincirlikuyu v... commented 2026-09-23 19:00:28 UTC by Alikam ♦13 |
| 188378383 (Comments: 2) | marmara_editor (Discussed changesets: 5) | Merhaba, özelden iletiyorum. commented 2026-09-23 18:56:21 UTC by marmara_editor ♦18 |
| 187966364 (Comments: 6) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 53) | I would definitely caution against moving any address info off buildings and onto plots, so as not to break from the usual method of mapping addresses. Presumably someone interested in using plot data could automatically associate addresses with plot... commented 2026-09-23 18:52:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦388 |
| 187602615 (Comments: 1) | Bengalus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, nie dodawaj proszę opisu drogowskazów do ich nazwy (do tagu name). Możesz wykorzystać do tego celu tag destination=*, stworzyć relację destination_sign lub zostawić uwagę przy drogowskazie :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... commented 2026-09-23 18:52:19 UTC by MZPL ♦7 |
| 188818500 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | fixed commented 2026-09-23 18:39:37 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 176444179 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | fixed. commented 2026-09-23 18:39:31 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 148898369 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 324) | Zdravim, preco ste odsekli severny usek cesty 1141 a zrusili jej cislo? Podla Vas to uz nie je cesta 3. triedy cislo 1141? Mozno nie je 3. triedy v zmysle OSM (aj ked vacsinou ponechavame klasifikaciu od Slovenskej spravy ciest), ale cislo (ref) ste ... commented 2026-09-23 18:37:07 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 189452521 (Comments: 1) | heiman191 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please re-read, it's `abandoned:highway=` commented 2026-09-23 18:36:21 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,050 |
| 189262471 (Comments: 6) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello, Thanks, and fair enough — that page does say what you say it does, and I hadn't given it enough weight. I take the point that there's guidance behind you and that some areas have gone that way. Where I've end... commented 2026-09-23 18:35:17 UTC by RyanBush ♦12 |
| 170261745 (Comments: 2) | xrt (Discussed changesets: 66) | Bonjour Mateusz Konieczny. En effet cela s'écrit pictograms. Ce n'était pas une faute de frappe. Je n'avais pas compris l'importance du s final. Merci d'avoir pris le temps de me le dire. Je fais la correction commented 2026-09-23 18:33:30 UTC by xrt ♦24 |
| 158091584 (Comments: 2) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 139) | 👍 commented 2026-09-23 18:32:44 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,585 |
| 189184377 (Comments: 1) | blue1205 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, ich bin ja etwas neidisch auf dich. Ein Fahrrad mit TurboBoost um über Rasen und Ketten zu springen und eine AR-Brille, die einem Wege einblendet, die man sich wünscht. Da aber ein Großteil der Menschheit solch einen ... commented 2026-09-23 18:28:26 UTC by cyankahly ♦10 |
| 142639956 (Comments: 3) | SirCowMan (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for the confirmation! I now made this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189462131 commented 2026-09-23 18:25:45 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦400 |
| 149642622 (Comments: 3) | Walter Schlögl (Discussed changesets: 73) | Thanks. We sometime degrade roads even if they have and official number (as OSM classifies roads by importance), if they are used quite differently than what the number would imply (like it is a forest track now unusable for general traffic, even if ... commented 2026-09-23 18:24:15 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 189305245 (Comments: 4) | DerMario (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for the explanation! commented 2026-09-23 18:22:24 UTC by DerMario ♦5 |
| 189461567 (Comments: 1) | Fgjgdrou (Discussed changesets: 16) | This was meant to be normalising the access tagging across the Pentre Jane Morgan & Fferm Penglais accommodation areas, but it seems the changeset naming got amended by accident with the intervening changeset. commented 2026-09-23 18:15:14 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦19 |
| 189462131 (Comments: 2) | Jarek 🚲 (Discussed changesets: 128) | Ah, found the last six - they were on driveways, and I removed them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189463203 commented 2026-09-23 18:13:42 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦400 |
| 189409441 (Comments: 3) | unknown246 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sounds good, thanks! commented 2026-09-23 18:12:13 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦17 |
| 183018326 (Comments: 12) | stefvanschie (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2026-09-23 18:06:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189460078 (Comments: 3) | Reinoudje (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2026-09-23 18:05:42 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189460909 (Comments: 1) | Myazyk (Discussed changesets: 257) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-09-23 17:55:48 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦995 |
| 186802337 (Comments: 1) | michalowy220 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-09-23 17:55:27 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦995 |
| 189460596 (Comments: 1) | michalowy220 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2026-09-23 17:55:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦995 |
| 189446880 (Comments: 7) | ludozz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hier het nieuwe gebouw https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Stationslaan+74&objectId=0532100000016978&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=144737.001&geometry.y=523150.6865&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=... commented 2026-09-23 17:37:38 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189397614 (Comments: 4) | PaololXD (Discussed changesets: 3) | @PaololXD No tranquillo :D, magari sono stato un pò duro nel messaggio prima. Grazie per aver chiarito, in mia opinione non dovresti però eliminare informazioni utili e reali solo per un warning, magari potevi prima scrivermelo nel mio ... commented 2026-09-23 17:36:12 UTC by davide020382 ♦7 |
| 189461226 (Comments: 2) | ItaliA1delSole (Discussed changesets: 31) | SP20t02 - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.908909482411985&lng=7.679731859296453&z=19.211184022587116&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=3666574956978934&focus=photo&x=0.700226572491733&y=0.5670891838142559&zoom=2.469962... commented 2026-09-23 17:25:59 UTC by ItaliA1delSole ♦15 |
| 189455194 (Comments: 9) | ludozz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Veel van die tags zijn jaren oud. Mocht je zin hebben om het goed te krijgen graag. Ik heb al e.e.a. aangepast. Ik gebruik de validator van josm. Die slaat direct aan als er bv bicycle=no staat op een fietspad. Efitor iD kan niet goed omgaan me... commented 2026-09-23 17:25:48 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189438486 (Comments: 1) | tarheelcons (Discussed changesets: 1) | moved, sanity check if you like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189459772 commented 2026-09-23 16:54:32 UTC by m86 ♦23 |
| 150013617 (Comments: 4) | bruceas (Discussed changesets: 5) | I am a bit surprised that it would already qualify as a building commented 2026-09-23 16:39:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 143539665 (Comments: 2) | JakubC (Discussed changesets: 17) | Skąd Ty wziąłeś tą Zarę tutaj? xD https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5796951377 commented 2026-09-23 16:36:32 UTC by Szymson ♦558 |
 | 189339931 (Comments: 1) | BerryTrails (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi BerryTrails, I came across your changeset and noticed that segments of the motorway have been reclassified as trunk, specifically between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28384338 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543301532. These high... commented 2026-09-23 16:32:14 UTC by LakeTana ♦22 |
| 89734550 (Comments: 1) | Rfem (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7800964077) a inde si nespravne oznacil, ze priechod ma ostrovcek. Daj na to, prosim, pozor. Opravil som. dik. T. commented 2026-09-23 16:24:11 UTC by Tomas_J ♦418 |
 | 189332948 (Comments: 2) | BalkanMountain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Sammyhawkard, Thank you for the information you provided and I appreciate you for making the edits. commented 2026-09-23 16:23:49 UTC by BalkanMountain ♦1 |
| 189452801 (Comments: 2) | Waxahachie GIS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, Waterfront Drive is still named as such. commented 2026-09-23 16:22:06 UTC by Waxahachie GIS ♦1 |
| 171457857 (Comments: 2) | topolusitania (Discussed changesets: 91) | Hello, tks for the remarks. I myself didnt understand my edition.... Till I ve discovered what had happen. I merged buildings in the area with the independent tag address, where this building levels were. Corrected. commented 2026-09-23 16:17:46 UTC by topolusitania ♦266 |
| 173768648 (Comments: 2) | David Crochet (Discussed changesets: 44) | Bonjour. Non car la méta-relation contient bien 4 relation différentes : https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/NOR/FR-NOR-Altobus-Analysis.html#bus_D commented 2026-09-23 16:15:40 UTC by David Crochet ♦106 |
| 180675101 (Comments: 1) | shinylman (Discussed changesets: 5) | I'm not convinced that we should be tagging routes from "suggested bike routes" layer on the city bike map. These are simple roads that are bike-friendly, which we can indicate using bicycle_road=yes. The fact that these routes have no... commented 2026-09-23 16:14:50 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦25 |
| 189387394 (Comments: 2) | MountField (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi felipeeugenio, I apologize, I should have paid attention to the surrounding data and checked the available ground level imagery. I’ve gone ahead and added the lift gate visible in Bing Streetside as well as access tags. I appreciate you poin... commented 2026-09-23 16:12:44 UTC by MountField ♦1 |
| 189431801 (Comments: 1) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 121) | Hallo wheelmap_visitor! Dieser Kaugummiautomat ist meiner Meinung nach fatalerweise extra so niedrig montiert, dass schon kleine Erstklässler ihn bedienen können. Was zeichnet ihn aus, um als wheelchair=no getaggt zu werden? commented 2026-09-23 16:10:05 UTC by seewäldler ♦181 |
| 189414835 (Comments: 2) | Bobduhautdoubs (Discussed changesets: 3) | A mon avis permanente. La photo google maps ne montre pas le portail mais il est bien présent et imposant + barbelés. Je n'ai pas regardé le cadastre voir si c'était privé. Je doute fortement que cela soit... commented 2026-09-23 16:09:53 UTC by Bobduhautdoubs ♦1 |
| 189455132 (Comments: 1) | timurmr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Follows the guideline: "if entering or exiting the HOV lane(s) is only permitted at certain locations, modeling the HOV lane(s) as separate ways is preferable." (hov=*) commented 2026-09-23 15:54:26 UTC by timurmr ♦2 |
| 189431957 (Comments: 1) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 121) | Hallo wheelmap_visitor! Diese Bushaltestelle ist auf ein Hochbord umgebaut worden. Ist die dann nicht Rollstuhlgerecht? commented 2026-09-23 15:53:55 UTC by seewäldler ♦181 |
| 189456706 (Comments: 1) | timurmr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Follows the guideline: "if entering or exiting the HOV lane(s) is only permitted at certain locations, modeling the HOV lane(s) as separate ways is preferable." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hov) Existing example of su... commented 2026-09-23 15:53:27 UTC by timurmr ♦2 |
| 189432228 (Comments: 1) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 121) | Hallo wheelmap_visitor! Zumindest die Verkaufsebene und die Sitzplätze draußen sind rollstuhlgerecht erreichbar, nur das obere Stockwerk nicht. Wäre hier dann nicht eher limited passend? commented 2026-09-23 15:50:27 UTC by seewäldler ♦181 |
| 188969913 (Comments: 8) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 34) | ("Belarus" most notably deu.belta.by) commented 2026-09-23 15:48:38 UTC by OlasMapy ♦80 |
| 188907267 (Comments: 2) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 89) | przejście przez Meissnera po tej stronie zostało zlikwidowane. Skasowałem kawałek, ale trzepa tą stronę jeszcze sprawdzić. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189455126 Były tam jeszcze barierki, ale codziennie coś się zmienia. Ni... commented 2026-09-23 15:20:31 UTC by Bartek444 ♦72 |
| 188906279 (Comments: 1) | Taktaal (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo Taktaal, bitte beim mergen von Ways etwas besser aufpassen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189455236 commented 2026-09-23 15:19:29 UTC by Lezurex ♦245 |
| 189376682 (Comments: 4) | Teddy5245 (Discussed changesets: 2) | So if Frederick PD has nothing to with Flock cameras within their City limits, who installing them? Is PD allowing “someone” to “spy” on their citizens? The PD should take down the remaining Flocks and other ALPR. They hav... commented 2026-09-23 15:14:17 UTC by Teddy5245 ♦1 |
| 189438405 (Comments: 1) | m_p_13 (Discussed changesets: 163) | Już pomijam ten podwójny Janhub ale dojazd drogą polną ? Ten track Budowlana to wypadało by zmienić na residential do numeru 175 commented 2026-09-23 15:13:45 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦706 |
| 189421015 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Also looks good! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189421015 commented 2026-09-23 15:13:33 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189421256 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Edit looks good though you haven't added the road, just the `highway_authority_ref=*`. Glad to see more of your mapping! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2026-09-23 15:13:08 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189445909 (Comments: 1) | Hase (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin, das macht die Sache jetzt eher schlechter... Das Wegstück kann jetzt im Routing nicht mehr für einen Übergang Straße <-> Fuß-/Radweg genutzt werden. Außerdem wird ein Router die restrictions wohl ign... commented 2026-09-23 15:10:47 UTC by mgerken ♦82 |
| 182243791 (Comments: 2) | MichaelCollinson (Discussed changesets: 96) | Yep. Corrected commented 2026-09-23 15:10:39 UTC by MichaelCollinson ♦59 |
| 178994197 (Comments: 1) | RJ Lerng (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi there :) barrier nodes should only be placed on a pathway if they block that pathway. I have corrected these two gates. Thanks. commented 2026-09-23 14:53:52 UTC by sahshoor ♦31 |
| 189453921 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 65) | ...named Trinity commented 2026-09-23 14:52:37 UTC by Alex_457 ♦85 |
| 139795271 (Comments: 1) | staytuned (Discussed changesets: 55) | Siehe: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tmc-ref-wird-als-route-in-osmand-angezeigt/148009 commented 2026-09-23 14:52:21 UTC by chris66 ♦507 |
| 189447592 (Comments: 1) | Hansje123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-23 14:48:56 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 175971535 (Comments: 2) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 20) | Added heights to all ways in the relation. Was likely a quick tweak for 3d render. 1 level is normally ~3m https://beakerboy.github.io/OSMBuilding/?type=relation&id=20068469 commented 2026-09-23 14:40:12 UTC by j0hn33y ♦21 |
| 189311944 (Comments: 4) | kikeman97 (Discussed changesets: 5) | ambos caminos son usados frecuentemente, pero la mas usada seria la primera la a petrolera se uniría con la héctor ferrufino por la tarija y comercio , ya la mayor camacho y rene moreno entraria como secundaria, aunque igual sigue sien... commented 2026-09-23 14:35:59 UTC by kikeman97 ♦2 |
| 189433209 (Comments: 1) | JulietNovember96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changes look all good! Thank you for making the map better and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189433209 commented 2026-09-23 14:30:35 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189452865 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 188) | Използвани и Mapbox&Esri Clarity. commented 2026-09-23 14:30:34 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 188408018 (Comments: 2) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 11) | dzieki! nie do konca udana zmiana z grade3 na grade1 :). droga jest pokryta betonowymi grass paver. commented 2026-09-23 14:29:09 UTC by capt_planet ♦11 |
| 189364439 (Comments: 1) | IURI CAUAN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi, leia as intruções novamente! Depois de alinhar as imagens aos recursos existentes, comece a mapear primeiro todos os edifícios não mapeados. Para identificar edifícios já mapeados, dê um zoom... commented 2026-09-23 14:12:33 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦98 |
| 189425989 (Comments: 1) | une abeille (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thanks! We will wait for the imagery update to update the crossings and lanes alignment. commented 2026-09-23 14:08:22 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦547 |
| 189450994 (Comments: 3) | Clandestino_USR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Maybe because I discovered the platform literally 10 minutes ago, and I don't know yet how things work around here? Assuming everybody knows how to operate this app should not be automatic. commented 2026-09-23 14:06:16 UTC by Clandestino_USR ♦1 |
| 189450952 (Comments: 1) | Clandestino_USR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for the information but here is some advice to improve the way you contribute to OSM. OSM is a map which anyone may edit. If you find out that a shop do longer exists, the best way is that you up... commented 2026-09-23 14:00:39 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,080 |
| 104764363 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 207) | Почнах commented 2026-09-23 13:55:05 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 189451015 (Comments: 1) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 183) | Перевод в статус historic заброшенных военных объектов возле озера Балхаш commented 2026-09-23 13:49:59 UTC by solenoid jam ♦208 |
| 41115621 (Comments: 2) | hansemann1234 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Puh, das ist ja wirklich schon ein paar Tage her. Kann ich dir nun nicht beantworten, aber ich kann nachschauen, wenn ich wieder mal in der Gegen bin. commented 2026-09-23 13:48:53 UTC by hansemann1234 ♦2 |
| 189422918 (Comments: 1) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Getting these on Panoramax, too, would be very helpful for mapping these accurately. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189422918 commented 2026-09-23 13:47:46 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189129171 (Comments: 6) | marbt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, då förstår jag. Tack för svaret :) commented 2026-09-23 13:42:37 UTC by marbt ♦1 |
| 187447214 (Comments: 2) | btwhite92 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi there, This was deliberate; the trail is posted with both a 'blue' and 'black' designation, as opposed to other nearby trails in the same network with just a 'blue' or a 'black'. (https://imglink.cc/cdn/U... commented 2026-09-23 13:40:23 UTC by btwhite92 ♦111 |
| 163628414 (Comments: 1) | _Bolero_ (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello Bolero, even in Sep 2026, I do not see a construction start between Valas and Grekesh. All press releases of ARRSH just write about the 9.9 km section between Kombinat Metalurgjik and Valas (see e. g. https://www.arrsh.gov.al/inspektim-punimesh... commented 2026-09-23 13:36:48 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦62 |
| 170644038 (Comments: 3) | Map-Peter (Discussed changesets: 37) | Ah, Lärz, Fusion! Da gibt es viiieeele Namen, hahahaha. Ok, ich lasse die Namen bei den Wiesen. Gruß Tino commented 2026-09-23 13:34:09 UTC by einufo ♦15 |
| 189363885 (Comments: 1) | Giovanna Vejam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vou rever pois apagou vias que existem para adicionar vias inexistentes e pela má qualidade. tenha mais atenção na proxima! commented 2026-09-23 13:30:03 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦98 |
| 177522467 (Comments: 4) | Protoxenus (Discussed changesets: 139) | Ich versuche mich mal dran, wenn ich wieder zu Hause bin. Luftbild ist jetzt noch aussagekräftiger, außerdem war ich zufällig da, als zu Reinigungszwecken ein Gitterrost entnommen wurde… commented 2026-09-23 13:28:14 UTC by einufo ♦15 |
| 189445025 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 80) | Човек, лагна ми EveryDoor от бележките и scribbles в източната част... :D commented 2026-09-23 13:25:18 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 177701604 (Comments: 1) | iDrunK (Discussed changesets: 1) | 12 minutes de trajet pour le téléphérique des Laquets semble incohérent par rapport aux 7 minutes du téléphérique du pic du midi (7 minutes). Pouvez-vous confirmer? quelle est la source de l'info? commented 2026-09-23 13:16:07 UTC by benoitdd ♦96 |
| 189366689 (Comments: 1) | CrtGabriel06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi, Gabriel, edifícios devem ser mapeados individualmente! tome mais cuidado na proxima e não devem ter nomes genericos como "casas" obrigado pela sua contribuição Caso tenha alguma duvida entre em contato<... commented 2026-09-23 13:05:45 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦98 |
| 188463833 (Comments: 2) | Abd el Kerim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die Info über das MTB war überflüssig. Es ist alles mit Dornen zugewachsen, d. h. es gibt keinen durchgängig erkennbaren Pfad. Am Ausgang ist ein Steilstück (3 m), das man normalen Wanderern, ich denke an ältere Personen... commented 2026-09-23 12:57:50 UTC by Abd el Kerim ♦2 |
| 189439825 (Comments: 1) | MattClegg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for contributing to OSM and welcome to OSM! Unfortunately I've marked these edits as bad and you can see my updates here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189448142 The problem is that the club is already a node on... commented 2026-09-23 12:55:58 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 182478728 (Comments: 3) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Alright, don't know how to tag that either. Just stumbled over this while researching how to tag a bath house. I'll leave it to you. commented 2026-09-23 12:53:39 UTC by LingM ♦19 |
| 161710042 (Comments: 1) | Hernachi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, You tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353933896 as building=bathroom. Would the way more popular tag building=toilets fit here? commented 2026-09-23 12:51:21 UTC by LingM ♦19 |
| 189447729 (Comments: 1) | Juan Andrés Moreno Rubio (Discussed changesets: 2) | Los Canarios es la capital municipal (831 hab., INE 2025): hamlet→village + capital=8. Fuente: Nomenclátor Geográfico IGN. Edición relacionada: #189447331. commented 2026-09-23 12:46:43 UTC by Juan Andrés Moreno Rubio ♦2 |
| 189447331 (Comments: 1) | Juan Andrés Moreno Rubio (Discussed changesets: 2) | Complemento al comentario: nodo label añadido a la relación del municipio para que el nombre "Fuencaliente de La Palma" se sitúe en el núcleo (Los Canarios) en lugar del centroide del polígono, que ca&iacu... commented 2026-09-23 12:45:58 UTC by Juan Andrés Moreno Rubio ♦2 |
| 189417762 (Comments: 2) | aesobczack (Discussed changesets: 4) | Complementei! Agradeço a recomendação. commented 2026-09-23 12:40:52 UTC by aesobczack ♦3 |
| 115895166 (Comments: 2) | 30asp (Discussed changesets: 2) | yes looks like a typo, I'll do a walk by of that area tomorrow and update all shops on that strip in OSM. Thanks commented 2026-09-23 12:36:41 UTC by 30asp ♦2 |
| 189441491 (Comments: 1) | rosshuggett (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Thank you for adding this information to OSM! And welcome to OSM! One minor note is that generally `access=yes` is not required for things like `amenity=bicycle_parking` as public access is implied. It's not wrong to tag it th... commented 2026-09-23 12:34:42 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189447180 (Comments: 1) | Badojo (Discussed changesets: 125) | changeset caught bus lines, sorry for big box commented 2026-09-23 12:34:14 UTC by Badojo ♦166 |
| 189399206 (Comments: 1) | Aromur (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, street_cabinet=power ist deprecated. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_cabinet%3Dpower Gruß surveyor54 commented 2026-09-23 12:30:09 UTC by surveyor54 ♦692 |
| 189421532 (Comments: 1) | Tomboli (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, warum wurde das Format der Telefonnummer wieder geändert? +49 6051 6183-0 war doch soweit in Ordnung. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone?uselang=de Gruß surveyor54 commented 2026-09-23 12:26:22 UTC by surveyor54 ♦692 |
| 189444398 (Comments: 1) | Kwesi Arthur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kwesi Arthur, welcome to OSM. Note that we don't map to suit any particular router or renderer, and it is unacceptable to remove legitimate data to suit any ride-hailing service. The roads you removed physically exist; they may not be... commented 2026-09-23 12:26:08 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦187 |
| 189427545 (Comments: 2) | DodaBettaMountain (Discussed changesets: 4) | and the geometry, it is easy to round curves with JOSm, use shift+C when laying the ways. regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189427545 commented 2026-09-23 12:23:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189444115 (Comments: 1) | thokster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Este cambio fue revertido. En este lugar parece haber cuatro contenedores suterrados: uno para residuos sólidos sin sistema específico de recogida (gris), otro para envases de plástico y latas (amarillo), uno ... commented 2026-09-23 12:22:18 UTC by dcapillae ♦460 |
| 174053055 (Comments: 2) | ballasz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Közben egyeztettem G. Petivel, hogy ez itt egy kitérő a tündérvölgyi kilátáshoz, ami a P-6-ról ágazik le, de zölddel festettétek ki. Így Palos-8-ról átí... commented 2026-09-23 12:18:15 UTC by petervelosy ♦5 |
| 189442341 (Comments: 1) | Nicolas Bonazzola (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Corregí un nodo del cruce peatonal de Avenida Alem que estaba puesto en el río. Probablemente un error de click con el botón incorrecto al editar. Pero fijate que el editor iD tien... commented 2026-09-23 12:15:49 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189342577 (Comments: 1) | Affiliate link (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189446127 commented 2026-09-23 12:11:43 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189327334 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189445827 commented 2026-09-23 12:04:23 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189436595 (Comments: 2) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 183) | Hello. OpenStreetMap is an international project and has no official language. This allows mappers from different countries to contribute to the shared effort. I see no issue with using any language. I also believe that using one's native ... commented 2026-09-23 11:55:28 UTC by solenoid jam ♦208 |
| 189437087 (Comments: 5) | HeimKon (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2026-09-23 11:52:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 186643035 (Comments: 6) | MrMöbius (Discussed changesets: 1) | ça marche, merci ! commented 2026-09-23 11:46:48 UTC by samuel_geovelo ♦15 |
| 43840026 (Comments: 2) | PanierAvide (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, merci pour ce retour. N'hésitez pas à modifier directement si c'est bien le cas sur le terrain. Je n'ai pas l'occasion d'aller vérifier par moi-même sur place. Cordialement. commented 2026-09-23 11:43:33 UTC by PanierAvide ♦62 |
| 189412322 (Comments: 4) | Negjana (Discussed changesets: 85) | Overnoding ist schon länger als zu vermeiden bekannt, weil die letzten cm zur genauen Kurve vor allem in Kombination mit dem öfters nicht von dir korrigierten Versatz importierter Daten da mMn die falsche Priorisierung ist. Und bei den OSMF... commented 2026-09-23 11:33:13 UTC by hlfan ♦119 |
| 189386552 (Comments: 2) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 48) | no response... reverted. commented 2026-09-23 11:33:11 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 188848571 (Comments: 2) | Zwiadowca21 (Discussed changesets: 38) | poprawiłem tagowanie commented 2026-09-23 11:33:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189434941 (Comments: 1) | LakeEyasi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Internal roads inside a building are not a residential road. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189434941 commented 2026-09-23 11:28:45 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 159241531 (Comments: 1) | resettler (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! You used animal=horsewalker on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18296635/history Have you maybe meant animal=horse_walker ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-09-23 11:22:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187617085 (Comments: 1) | Decorator1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! You used place=islan on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310584162/history Have you maybe meant place=island ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-23 11:21:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 182991455 (Comments: 1) | CH_HHH (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used shop=gift,_clothes,_furniture on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4314721691/history Have you maybe meant shop=gift;clothes;furniture ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just... commented 2026-09-23 11:19:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 110037728 (Comments: 1) | trainmahon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used shop=hunting,_fishing on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9025241717/history Have you maybe meant shop=hunting;fishing ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ... commented 2026-09-23 11:18:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 147926202 (Comments: 1) | Karl K Schneider (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! You used shop=outdoor,_hardware on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11664935998/history Have you maybe meant shop=outdoor;hardware ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it ... commented 2026-09-23 11:18:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 171423869 (Comments: 4) | atchisson (Discussed changesets: 8) | Je suis toujours pas certain d'avoir compris, je pense que c'est mieux que tu le fasses effectivement, et j'étudierais tes modifications ensuite J'aimerais effectivement ajouter le RTK à mon process un jour o... commented 2026-09-23 11:17:19 UTC by atchisson ♦25 |
| 96740423 (Comments: 1) | tartiflex (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! You used railway:signal:position=lef on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8279027389/history Have you maybe meant railway:signal:position=left ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just ... commented 2026-09-23 11:04:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 28158692 (Comments: 1) | Linie29 (Discussed changesets: 92) | Hello! You used railway:local_operated=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1905100525/history Have you maybe meant railway:local_operated=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replac... commented 2026-09-23 11:04:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 173044552 (Comments: 1) | Sai Charitha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410520028/history has building:flats = G0,G1,G2,G3,F1,F2,F3 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to e... commented 2026-09-23 11:03:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189441959 (Comments: 1) | xtrb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-09-23 11:01:18 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189441783 (Comments: 1) | mslevi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia. Egy tipp: ha megnyomod a Q betűt a házon, akkor szabályos derékszögekre alakítja a sarkokat. Sokkal szebben mutat majd a térképen. commented 2026-09-23 10:47:30 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 82879231 (Comments: 4) | MrLusignana (Discussed changesets: 10) | No problem - many thanks for drawing my attention to the issue. commented 2026-09-23 10:47:11 UTC by MrLusignana ♦9 |
| 189284870 (Comments: 2) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 55) | Danke fürs aufmerksam machen von meinem Fehler! Ich werde mich alsbald bemühen ihn zu korregieren ;) commented 2026-09-23 10:41:45 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦76 |
| 189440597 (Comments: 1) | tuzticzka (Discussed changesets: 5) | accidentally removed whole piece of road, I'll revert this changeset commented 2026-09-23 10:30:23 UTC by tuzticzka ♦3 |
| 189352001 (Comments: 1) | myself1232 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please, don't delete the building= tag. If you add a new business, it's better to create a new node within the building polygon commented 2026-09-23 10:20:00 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦309 |
| 189362502 (Comments: 1) | Kovarubilo (Discussed changesets: 1) | остановка или велопарковка? commented 2026-09-23 10:17:54 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦309 |
| 188923118 (Comments: 3) | AngelaVox (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for responding to this and my other comments. I advise not to change names because nearby similar names exists, it could be wrong or right and only an on the ground survey will be more helpful in cases like this. commented 2026-09-23 10:17:06 UTC by Enock4seth ♦678 |
| 188921049 (Comments: 3) | TMTB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you! Looking forward to the improvements :) commented 2026-09-23 10:09:07 UTC by Enock4seth ♦678 |
| 189379955 (Comments: 1) | Nike petshop (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good evening. Business categories look better now, but for eateries where food is pre-cooked please use fast food category instead of restaurant. Also please use mixed-case letters, only first letter of every word capizalized, not all caps (An... commented 2026-09-23 10:07:03 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦203 |
| 189373196 (Comments: 1) | 02333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | What did you mean? What does 023 mean, what is this name for? commented 2026-09-23 10:06:57 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦309 |
| 189430614 (Comments: 1) | bentzy (Discussed changesets: 36) | שלום בנצי, הגשר כבר קיים והעברתי את התמונות שלך אליו. אין צורך ליצור שוב ושוב את הנקודה. commented 2026-09-23 10:06:26 UTC by hatul ♦529 |
| 189378648 (Comments: 2) | Bagus Puji Rahardjo (Discussed changesets: 1) | The name of my home commented 2026-09-23 10:04:49 UTC by Bagus Puji Rahardjo ♦1 |
| 189419869 (Comments: 12) | Jesse1337 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zie tips Geim commented 2026-09-23 10:03:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 188760628 (Comments: 3) | DimitarName (Discussed changesets: 5) | Струва ми се че е подобно на вече несъществуващата "Гражданска защита". За този вид служба по-правилен таг би бил emergency=disaster_response. commented 2026-09-23 10:03:12 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,039 |
| 189390049 (Comments: 6) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 22) | 😍 commented 2026-09-23 09:48:14 UTC by Dezza ♦35 |
| 189338666 (Comments: 1) | Latte1971 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ach ja - hier hab ich mal die Doppelte Addresse auf dem hinteren gebäudeteil wieder entfernt. Das glüht gerade in allen Validatoren rot :) Addressen sind typischerweise einem flurstück oder Gebäude zugeteilt - wenn sich ei... commented 2026-09-23 09:46:47 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 181264118 (Comments: 3) | Yannick Lambin (Discussed changesets: 11) | perfectly possible to bike if you have some skills. so, not forbidden. commented 2026-09-23 09:46:12 UTC by Bear-in-a-box ♦61 |
| 189397661 (Comments: 1) | Latte1971 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin, also - hier bei den Gebäuden - ich habe das mal getrennt bzw zusammengeführt - Es ist besser die POIs (Point of Interest) als Node auszuführen, und nicht als gebäude die übereinander gestapelt sind. Wenn sollt... commented 2026-09-23 09:44:50 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 147950133 (Comments: 2) | 1998alexkane (Discussed changesets: 62) | Never mind. commented 2026-09-23 09:43:53 UTC by MapsByEX ♦2 |
| 181263859 (Comments: 2) | Yannick Lambin (Discussed changesets: 11) | When I tryed to take this path with my bike (on 4 april 2026), a wooden fence blocked the way on both sides of this path. commented 2026-09-23 09:42:13 UTC by Yannick Lambin ♦8 |
| 189397781 (Comments: 1) | Latte1971 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin, ich habe den edit gesehen - cool das du mit mappst - ich habe hier den Parkplatz mal von dem Landuse abgelöst. Unterschiedliche objekte miteineinander zu verbinden ist doof für das Nachbearbeiten. Ansonsten alles gut. |
| 189031458 (Comments: 1) | ZA Gae (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OSM! Darf ich Dich etwas zum Öffnungszeiten Eintrag fragen? Dein Eintrag lautet "week 01-53 Mo-Th 08:00-17:00; week 01-53 We,Fr 08:00-12:00" Da der week Eintrag identisch ist würde auch ein "Mo-Th 08:00-17:00; ... commented 2026-09-23 09:41:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,858 |
| 182845641 (Comments: 1) | bufferclip (Discussed changesets: 6) | Lustig – den Trampelpfad vom Baumschulenweg zur ehemaligen Startbahn hatte ich schon mal kartiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286132622 commented 2026-09-23 09:37:00 UTC by MapsByEX ♦2 |
| 189436613 (Comments: 2) | einfach_nur_laurin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, mach ich, danke für den Hinweis. Gruß Laurin commented 2026-09-23 09:23:54 UTC by einfach_nur_laurin ♦2 |
| 185065050 (Comments: 2) | Fausto29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | C'est fait... Une Question. Lors des modifications à l'aides des photos satélites dans OpenStreetMap, est possible de faire apparaitre les coordonnées géographique du curseur ? si oui , comment faire? Merci... commented 2026-09-23 09:21:45 UTC by Fausto29 ♦1 |
| 189297059 (Comments: 2) | TMTB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Enock4seth, although I couldn't map the whole fence I am absolutely certain that these paths are not continuously usable any longer as there's a newly created and fenced off farmland. commented 2026-09-23 09:20:46 UTC by TMTB ♦3 |
| 189436710 (Comments: 2) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Je kunt in iD de BGT als achtergrond zetten ergens rechts in het scherm. Dan zie je hoe de paden in werkelijkheid lopen. commented 2026-09-23 09:14:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189241727 (Comments: 1) | Melvin0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Melvin0, this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.86552&lat=48.59218&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&... commented 2026-09-23 09:06:43 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 189377022 (Comments: 1) | Abdul Aziz Musthofa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Iya kah? kelihatannya bangunan rumahnya sih yang dihapus.... commented 2026-09-23 09:02:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189432355 (Comments: 1) | palasah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Selamat datang di OpenStreetMap! Mohon cek pesan pribadi dari saya ya commented 2026-09-23 08:57:39 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189437137 (Comments: 1) | DD1GJ (Discussed changesets: 105) | Richtiger Kommentar: AED Lichtental commented 2026-09-23 08:57:11 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,465 |
| 161764497 (Comments: 1) | Arefsn89 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353386570/history has building:levels = 4.9 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-23 08:57:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 138608016 (Comments: 1) | Skiper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161359958/history has building:levels = 19.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-23 08:55:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189426810 (Comments: 1) | Krizzlaila (Discussed changesets: 1) | surface=awalana_beton_dan_dilanjutkan_dengan_tanah_,_kemudian_tanah_lepas_kerikil_dan_batuan_terweosi ?? Pilih saja "Belum perkerasan" commented 2026-09-23 08:54:33 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189434802 (Comments: 1) | Dodo20 (Discussed changesets: 2) | event lari? commented 2026-09-23 08:47:30 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 87417043 (Comments: 2) | harry5691 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello Mateusz, Thank you, I have fix it and set an end_date because the shop will be close at 2027/01/31. commented 2026-09-23 08:38:29 UTC by harry5691 ♦7 |
| 176773618 (Comments: 3) | augxcgrwxo (Discussed changesets: 64) | Thanks for fix and your editing in general? commented 2026-09-23 08:35:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189387547 (Comments: 1) | T-HUD (Discussed changesets: 2) | What's the purpose of way/1561302137 which is without any data? commented 2026-09-23 08:30:41 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦275 |
 | 189238511 (Comments: 1) | Nancy Benard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! If you wanted to add tree you should have used natural=tree commented 2026-09-23 08:19:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189432644 (Comments: 1) | Lisa1234333333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: I accidentally used a comment about the separate coastal path. The warning about erosion and cliff edges does not describe Venture Cove Way. This edit updates the shared private driveway’s classification, ownership and descri... commented 2026-09-23 08:18:27 UTC by Lisa1234333333 ♦1 |
| 189433329 (Comments: 8) | Beheerder Veluwe Noord (Discussed changesets: 6) | inderdaad het is alleen toegankelijk voor de beheerders en kampeerders. commented 2026-09-23 08:15:55 UTC by Beheerder Veluwe Noord ♦3 |
| 189417968 (Comments: 3) | einfach_nur_laurin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke - erstmal sind sie erfasst - das ist ja schon mal nicht schlecht. Ich hatte schon 2 Säulen eingetragen - die kann man auch m.E. auf dem Luftbild sehen. Die Frage der Kapazität habe ich in ein fixme pro Ladesäule gesetzt. ... commented 2026-09-23 08:15:07 UTC by tux67 ♦2,071 |
| 189435042 (Comments: 1) | Nodari_PCR (Discussed changesets: 1) | ricordati anche il tag addr:city (nome Comune) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189435042 commented 2026-09-23 08:13:08 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 151853741 (Comments: 2) | Davidus2000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Just fixed it. commented 2026-09-23 08:08:30 UTC by Davidus2000 ♦3 |
| 188956358 (Comments: 1) | Jaspe Gentille (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jaspe Gentille, thanks for removing highway=path from amenity=university. For the barrier=gate you added are these based on local knowledge, some recommendation or assumption ? commented 2026-09-23 08:08:08 UTC by Enock4seth ♦678 |
| 189423651 (Comments: 2) | RAW- (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dear RAW-, in this changeset you have attempted to remove buildings that you had previously uploaded, however you left the nodes intact, creating "orphaned" nodes. I have now removed these contributions. commented 2026-09-23 07:59:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189432536 (Comments: 1) | Darknut (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, je viens de corriger ces points de recyclage car vous aviez mélangé les attributs des deux bac différents. commented 2026-09-23 07:58:14 UTC by Syl ♦1,120 |
| 189435025 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 124) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189409924, 189413200, 189420870, 189421240, 189422007, 189422226, 189423651. commented 2026-09-23 07:58:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189435026 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 124) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189409924, 189413200, 189420870, 189421240, 189422007, 189422226, 189423651. commented 2026-09-23 07:58:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189409924 (Comments: 1) | RAW- (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189435026, 189435025 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy building import commented 2026-09-23 07:58:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189422226 (Comments: 1) | RAW- (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189435026, 189435025 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy building import commented 2026-09-23 07:57:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189413200 (Comments: 1) | RAW- (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189435026, 189435025 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy building import commented 2026-09-23 07:57:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189420870 (Comments: 1) | RAW- (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189435026, 189435025 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy building import commented 2026-09-23 07:57:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189421240 (Comments: 1) | RAW- (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189435026, 189435025 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy building import commented 2026-09-23 07:57:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189422007 (Comments: 1) | RAW- (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189435026, 189435025 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy building import commented 2026-09-23 07:57:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189303976 (Comments: 1) | ray_ilands (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189434922 where the changeset comment is: contributions from AI agents not allowed commented 2026-09-23 07:54:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189434922 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 124) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189278351, 189303976. commented 2026-09-23 07:54:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189278351 (Comments: 1) | ray_ilands (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189434922 where the changeset comment is: contributions from AI agents not allowed commented 2026-09-23 07:54:30 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189390138 (Comments: 1) | Silviopen (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ciao. Se non sono scale, non hanno significato i tag handrail, incline, ramp e tactile_paving. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189390138 commented 2026-09-23 07:53:23 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,541 |
| 189321790 (Comments: 1) | Yuri2001 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189434623 commented 2026-09-23 07:51:19 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 188713352 (Comments: 3) | Pi31416ESP (Discussed changesets: 2) | La propiedad del estado del firme en los carriles la he añadido con base en mi conocimiento de los mismos por haberlos visitado de forma presencial. commented 2026-09-23 07:48:38 UTC by Pi31416ESP ♦1 |
| 189433723 (Comments: 3) | Beheerder Veluwe Noord (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bedankt voor uw reactie. Het bosgebied heb ik losgemaakt van de wegen. Weghalen is oke, maar disused:highway=path is een manier om opnieuw intekenen te voorkomen. De paden staan nog in de BGT als bestaand pad. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-23 07:45:56 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189402262 (Comments: 1) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 33) | Prosím, piš pořádné komentáře ke změnám: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2026-09-23 07:39:15 UTC by Štěpán Škorpil ♦7 |
 | 189352261 (Comments: 1) | Jorge198@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189434374 commented 2026-09-23 07:38:41 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189321531 (Comments: 1) | Yuri2001 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189434352 commented 2026-09-23 07:38:03 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189433354 (Comments: 1) | Beheerder Veluwe Noord (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag Beheerder, We taggen geen access=no in zo'n geval. Het zal eerder access=private zijn of customers. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-23 07:34:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189321418 (Comments: 1) | Yuri2001 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189432422 commented 2026-09-23 07:31:36 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189433308 (Comments: 1) | Beheerder Veluwe Noord (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag Beheerder, access=destination is voldoende. U hoeft dan niet al die weggebruikers met accesstags toe te voegen. =no klopt ook niet, want de toegang is immers destination. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-23 07:31:19 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189323198 (Comments: 1) | ahm4dera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189432319 commented 2026-09-23 07:30:33 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189358693 (Comments: 1) | Camron Day (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189432206 commented 2026-09-23 07:29:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189342266 (Comments: 1) | yangomes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189431513 commented 2026-09-23 07:28:13 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189370878 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189429268 commented 2026-09-23 07:27:21 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189406894 (Comments: 9) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 47) | So all the SfB brands will need to be set up in the NSI. They are coming out of the woodwork, too. I've got a running list. commented 2026-09-23 07:27:09 UTC by TheNightRider ♦84 |
| 189322083 (Comments: 1) | Skyshark95 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189393782 commented 2026-09-23 07:26:31 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189362355 (Comments: 1) | Alícia Mota Tavares (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189393210 commented 2026-09-23 07:25:33 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189350906 (Comments: 1) | Masmok2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189388112 commented 2026-09-23 07:24:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189341200 (Comments: 1) | FreedomPls (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379639 commented 2026-09-23 07:24:30 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189367917 (Comments: 1) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433664 commented 2026-09-23 07:18:08 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 187692930 (Comments: 1) | S_Martinolli75 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao, ok per l'inserimento del civico 113, ma riferito a che via / località ? commented 2026-09-23 07:17:53 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 189418609 (Comments: 3) | embok (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you :) Yeah it's hard enough even knowing it. So long as there are no glaring issues it hopefully is okay commented 2026-09-23 07:14:53 UTC by embok ♦5 |
| 189368243 (Comments: 1) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433536 commented 2026-09-23 07:14:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 178358359 (Comments: 1) | Yannick Lambin (Discussed changesets: 11) | I don't see a corresponding sign that would imply your change. Please provide evidence. commented 2026-09-23 07:14:37 UTC by Bear-in-a-box ♦61 |
| 189329826 (Comments: 7) | paisleyparkmrb (Discussed changesets: 1) | They do seem to be seeing these comments! In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189429157, they had fixed up some (but not all) of their tagging errors. I've asked them to create a permanent account to use. The SEO company behind all... commented 2026-09-23 07:09:50 UTC by Joel Koen ♦87 |
| 187734428 (Comments: 3) | Przemek_Bo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cześć Mateusz, dzięki za komentarz. Odcinek oznaczony jako motorway_link to fragment nowego węzła, którego wcześniej w tym miejscu nie było i powstaje dopiero w ramach obecnej przebudowy. Natomiast odcinek trunk to stara droga, k... commented 2026-09-23 07:07:55 UTC by Przemek_Bo ♦4 |
| 189351326 (Comments: 1) | MikeShep (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433246 commented 2026-09-23 07:04:33 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
 | 189358533 (Comments: 6) | elisha_maps (Discussed changesets: 3) | > Sollte ich mich eher auf ein Land / eine Region konzentrieren, welche noch keine richtigen Wege hat und wo noch keine Häuser so richtig eingezeichnet worden sind? Du musst dich überhaupt nicht auf eine bestimmte Region konzentri... commented 2026-09-23 07:00:51 UTC by habi ♦2,268 |
| 189421812 (Comments: 1) | unfoxo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao buon giorno. In realtà il civico 35 esisteva già (quì: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3600083295) da valutare quindi, piuttosto che creare un doppione, se la posizione precedente è da aggiornare con l'informa... commented 2026-09-23 06:56:32 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 189429157 (Comments: 1) | littlefuneralco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Well then, it looks like you are reading changeset comments after all. Please create a permanent account to use. We don't mind if you're being paid to add businesses on their behalf, but given OSM is a community project, being able t... commented 2026-09-23 06:55:30 UTC by Joel Koen ♦87 |
| 189419318 (Comments: 1) | delcont (Discussed changesets: 4) | Anche quì come il precedente, tag addr:city si mette il Comune, la frazione eventualmente andrebbe citata nel addr:subburb --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189419318 ... commented 2026-09-23 06:53:27 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 189418467 (Comments: 1) | delcont (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao buon giorno! Il tag addr:city viene usato per citare il Comune relativo all'indirizzo del posto. In questo caso è Aviano. San Martino di Campagna è solo una frazione di Aviano, che se vuoi citare nell'indirizzo va utilizz... commented 2026-09-23 06:52:42 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 189404814 (Comments: 1) | S_Martinolli75 (Discussed changesets: 4) | attenzione che hai fatto convergere diversi nodi della Via Viola sull’incrocio con Via di Mezzo, non direttamente comunicante con la stessa, creando una sovrapposizione surreale del percorso della highway sopra l’edificato. Da sistemare, ... commented 2026-09-23 06:46:55 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 189255685 (Comments: 5) | DetMaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Du kannst gerne auch die Daten korrigieren. Nur so lassen, sollten wir es besser nicht :) Danke. commented 2026-09-23 06:44:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
| 189340129 (Comments: 1) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 33) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189432167 commented 2026-09-23 06:33:35 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189384216 (Comments: 3) | fx99 (Discussed changesets: 83) | Schönes Projekt. Danke für die Erklärung. commented 2026-09-23 06:30:38 UTC by MrAnderson ♦12 |
| 189323843 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189431996 commented 2026-09-23 06:26:46 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 188446372 (Comments: 1) | cxs (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi, ist das irgendwie übrig geblieben? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14143464582 commented 2026-09-23 06:17:31 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189351246 (Comments: 1) | MikeShep (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189431611 commented 2026-09-23 06:15:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189062562 (Comments: 2) | PA_Barre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi PA_Barre, these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here? Guido commented 2026-09-23 06:08:03 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 189208928 (Comments: 4) | gouranga63 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, en effet l'argument du changement de date de levée fait sens ! Je m’attellerai à faire la distinction à l'avenir. Bonne continuation ! commented 2026-09-23 06:00:52 UTC by gouranga63 ♦2 |
| 189311667 (Comments: 2) | Mikenius (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, meine Gründe der Änderung: Korrekte Abbildung der tatsächlichen örtlichen Gegebenheiten. Die betreffende Fläche liegt innerhalb eines Privatgrundstücks und ist kein öffentlicher Verkehrsweg. Die Grun... commented 2026-09-23 05:59:33 UTC by Mikenius ♦1 |
| 189427566 (Comments: 1) | DavideGialli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. Dovresti completare l'opera scorporando dal building(edificio) tutta la famiglia degli 'addr:xxx" inseriti, posizionando il nodo del civico sull'effettiva entrata https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_speci... commented 2026-09-23 05:52:45 UTC by LucianoC63 ♦7 |
| 189246987 (Comments: 2) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello Wienerwald Tourismus GmbH, Thank you for clarifying that the Steinwandklamm Strecke is closed and discontinued. Removing only name=* does not remove it and leaves an unnamed bike route on the map. Also, OSM community guidelines suggest a... commented 2026-09-23 05:48:45 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189328712 (Comments: 2) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello andrewrunner, On iD Editor, you’d need to scroll down on the left panel and below the “Feature Type” presets and the “Fields” section that has data forms, you’ll see the “Tags” section. The... commented 2026-09-23 05:44:33 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 175044574 (Comments: 1) | acwamarin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you add a duplicate node for this café? I would propose to remove this one and tag the other one with amenity=ice_cream and coffee=yes commented 2026-09-23 05:33:58 UTC by chrstnbwnkl ♦6 |
| 189425337 (Comments: 1) | Spyder_Monkey (Discussed changesets: 5) | noooo why would you make it all multipolygons whyyyy Please use regular areas for landuse, unless there is a cutout of a different landuse within one landuse, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318010105 Using exclusively multipoly... commented 2026-09-23 05:26:40 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦75 |
| 189364622 (Comments: 1) | calvelage (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189429974 commented 2026-09-23 05:16:54 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189367818 (Comments: 1) | Antony Kaombe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189429572 commented 2026-09-23 04:59:49 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 188086790 (Comments: 4) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 36) | Thanks Marián for the source. Our most recent GPS traces also show no traffic on this section. JMGB, unless you have first-hand knowledge that the road sections are opened to public access and have started to carry traffic, we’d suggest ... commented 2026-09-23 04:48:04 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 188911277 (Comments: 2) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Егина, thank you for getting in touch. I restored the data after visual inspection from the satellite did not exactly support the definition for highway=residential. If there have been recent constructions and developments and the road classi... commented 2026-09-23 04:35:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
 | 154531145 (Comments: 1) | DetectiveConan (Discussed changesets: 10) | This relation labels a large area as “Ta’ang State” with boundary=administrative and admin_level=3, overlapping the established Shan State and Kachin State boundaries. Ta’ang State is not an official Myanmar administrative div... commented 2026-09-23 03:54:49 UTC by k1ngtai ♦1 |
| 189319874 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189427684 commented 2026-09-23 03:36:28 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189334261 (Comments: 1) | Snowshoe Outlet (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you can use the "Q" keyboard shortcut to square all the corners of the building you're drawing. It helps a lot! commented 2026-09-23 03:30:58 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦54 |
| 189408439 (Comments: 1) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welcome to Washington! You picked the best part of the state commented 2026-09-23 03:27:32 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦54 |
| 188553202 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Is node/14152741206 a man_made=sewer_vent? commented 2026-09-23 03:20:20 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
 | 189279060 (Comments: 4) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 177) | Thanks. If you watch the history at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1560305370/history you see that it was not me who tagged these ways as track. And the way which appears as deleted was caused by merging of segments of the same road... commented 2026-09-23 03:14:37 UTC by ratrun ♦305 |
| 189417151 (Comments: 5) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | A placa de 50 km/h que eu me referia é essa: https://www.google.com/maps/@-20.2549138,-42.1412444,783a,15y,46.57h,85.94t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sUp4UnrdgXvBvVKhDYmQgjw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3F... commented 2026-09-23 03:07:48 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦29 |
| 188562584 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 155) | (by previous comment I mean changeset/188562883) commented 2026-09-23 03:05:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 188562883 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 155) | I'm not so sure about this. bicycle=* is an access tag. bicycle=designated provides the strongest declaration that riding is explicitly allowed by signage, markings or otherwise implied. Most of these are very informal, none are officiall... commented 2026-09-23 03:04:25 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 188561970 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 155) | We do already have way/180819052 as abandoned:landuse=landfill which covers the whole site of the former landfill, including the area rehabilited as the MTB pump track. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM... commented 2026-09-23 02:54:55 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189302929 (Comments: 2) | lambalicious (Discussed changesets: 29) | Gracias. Me gana aún la costumbre de dejar algunas cosas epxlícitas. commented 2026-09-23 02:50:02 UTC by lambalicious ♦6 |
| 189189131 (Comments: 3) | carlosguerrero_lyft (Discussed changesets: 8) | I've created a forum post at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-service-value-for-fuel-pump-aisles-at-amenity-fuel/148007/2 commented 2026-09-23 02:49:48 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦147 |
| 188555623 (Comments: 2) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/12838645522 looks like you've dragged the tree node across, it's easy to do that in iD, so just need to try and be careful to avoid doing so next time. commented 2026-09-23 02:46:48 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189378713 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_Nguyen Thi Ngoc Tram (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey - just checking you used the correct tag here. Permissive suggests the road is open to all traffic and pedestrians until told otherwise. My understanding of the manned gates here is the opposite - closed to general traffic unless you are given pe... commented 2026-09-23 02:38:10 UTC by pepsi_max2k ♦17 |
| 189423198 (Comments: 1) | Dodo20 (Discussed changesets: 2) | event lari? commented 2026-09-23 02:37:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189424995 (Comments: 1) | BAHARI SABURAI (Discussed changesets: 2) | jangan lupa beri judulnya, jangan hanya tanda strip "-" commented 2026-09-23 02:30:59 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 188554496 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1555501460 on road bike lanes without any physical separation from the traffic aren't mapped as dedicated ways, they are mapped as cycleway=lane on the road way as is done for https://www.openstreetmap... commented 2026-09-23 02:08:10 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189320774 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 6) | hi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1555864277/history had informal=yes removed, while I haven't been there, if there's no indication it's maintained or endorsed or signposted by NPWS then likely informal=yes is correct. commented 2026-09-23 02:06:13 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 188215667 (Comments: 3) | Robtieman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Rob. I've updated it! commented 2026-09-23 02:01:51 UTC by will l ♦6 |
| 188556411 (Comments: 1) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 6) | are you sure this should be trail_visibility=excellent, is there signage, or clear markers guiding the path, or a constructed track surface that makes the path very clear? commented 2026-09-23 02:01:38 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189425022 (Comments: 1) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 36) | Natürlich "chicane=right", ist ja kein choker. commented 2026-09-23 01:02:02 UTC by Biff ♦27 |
| 189417604 (Comments: 1) | dudapiresgomes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, dudapiresgomes! Por que o nome está com um valor diferente do código da saída (ref)? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189417604 ... commented 2026-09-23 00:58:45 UTC by adrianojbr ♦594 |
| 185958369 (Comments: 3) | mod22 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sorry, das scheint leider in der EMail-Flut untergegangen zu sein. Also über wheelchair=yes haben wir uns glaube ich schon mal unterhalten. Die Tag wird explizit von SC entfernt, wenn es sich um ein neues Geschäft handelt, weil die n... commented 2026-09-23 00:57:57 UTC by mod22 ♦10 |
| 184774819 (Comments: 2) | Moonfire (Discussed changesets: 8) | My pleasure! I enjoyed cleaning up parts of 101 almost as much as I enjoyed driving it! The Avenue of the Giants was especially magical. commented 2026-09-23 00:57:51 UTC by Moonfire ♦8 |
| 189369039 (Comments: 1) | Geilson Damasceno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi, Geilson, obrigado pela sua contribuição Corpos hidridicos devem ser mapeados como (natural=water)[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:natural%3Dwater] e não como edificio Caso tenha alguma duvida entre em contato |
| 189417904 (Comments: 1) | Schlemuel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, Schlemuel. Problemas nos consumidores de dados devem ser resolvidos por eles, conforme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#N%C3%A3o_mapear_para_o_renderizador Abraço! --- ... commented 2026-09-23 00:55:33 UTC by adrianojbr ♦594 |
| 188916026 (Comments: 1) | MrYodaylay (Discussed changesets: 9) | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6897837131/history no longer a lookout, even with informal=yes? commented 2026-09-23 00:43:48 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189058879 (Comments: 1) | MrYodaylay (Discussed changesets: 9) | great work! commented 2026-09-23 00:42:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189320730 (Comments: 2) | Mattyp231 (Discussed changesets: 6) | for these reasons I've reverted this in changeset/189424692 commented 2026-09-23 00:33:07 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189424317 (Comments: 2) | TronnaLegacy (Discussed changesets: 2) | It appears Every Door added this "fixme". Please let me know if I should not have selected "wall-mounted" in Every Door. commented 2026-09-23 00:30:31 UTC by TronnaLegacy ♦5 |
| 68421475 (Comments: 1) | LukeyBear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Do you have a source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/64039488? It runs entirely on service roads that parallel the Sloan Channel. Thanks! commented 2026-09-23 00:01:42 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 188695413 (Comments: 1) | SaltyPeanuts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the mailbox that you've added at King and Wellington (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14161473775) doesn't seem to actually exist on the ground when I went to survey last week :(. I'm wondering where you sourced this data from. commented 2026-09-22 23:29:18 UTC by cswilson252 ♦26 |
| 156783877 (Comments: 1) | ProjetoMapeia (Discussed changesets: 60) | Essa via se classifica como via local, por isso o limite de velocidade é 30 km/h, e não de 60 km/h commented 2026-09-22 23:27:19 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189399542 (Comments: 1) | Casa_rp (Discussed changesets: 3) | We are back. Reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163398828 commented 2026-09-22 23:24:22 UTC by atlasmountains ♦4 |
| 189401769 (Comments: 1) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, Why was this area set to landuse - grass? It is already marked as residential and has a mix of houses, grass and trees. commented 2026-09-22 23:02:19 UTC by MikeN ♦371 |
| 171245760 (Comments: 1) | 1Mmarek (Discussed changesets: 17) | Zdravim, dakujem za pokus o "deaktivovanie" stanice Plavecky Mikulas. Ale ked ste len pridali disused:railway=station a ponechali railway=station, tak je stale aktivna (lebo disused=yes) ste vymazali. A este ste duplom pridali public_transp... commented 2026-09-22 23:01:39 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 103356755 (Comments: 1) | Jojo222 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, what do you fix here? How do you know that road segment is number 1050? You only quote Bing imagery as the source, where you cannot see road numbers. commented 2026-09-22 22:53:45 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 189420237 (Comments: 1) | Weronika1101 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dziękujemy za edycję w OSM, które można edytować na wiele sposobów - to nie tylko edycja atrybutów, ale też dodawanie nowych obiektów, usuwanie nieprawdziwych, zdezaktualizowanych, czy modyfikacja geometrii rozmaitych... commented 2026-09-22 22:45:21 UTC by Zwyklak ♦17 |
| 189416878 (Comments: 1) | krystianRB10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dziękujemy za edycję w OSM, które można edytować na wiele sposobów - to nie tylko edycja atrybutów, ale też dodawanie nowych obiektów, usuwanie nieprawdziwych, zdezaktualizowanych, czy modyfikacja geometrii rozmaitych... commented 2026-09-22 22:43:51 UTC by Zwyklak ♦17 |
| 189319904 (Comments: 4) | tanwei (Discussed changesets: 1) | ... couchsurfing! Sounds good to me :-) Regards, Tan Wei commented 2026-09-22 22:34:16 UTC by tanwei ♦1 |
| 189403931 (Comments: 3) | König Kai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Si, en Telegram. mejor por ahi. He estado averiguando. En verdad se llama APHS en todas las fuentes oficiales, menos en los carteles de las calles. Es un lindo caso para dirimir entre nombre "verdadero" y nombre "en terreno&qu... commented 2026-09-22 21:54:31 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189421751 (Comments: 1) | DibyoX (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tulaban Village, Marishya, Baghaichhari, Rangamati, Bangladesh. This note marks the approximate location of Tulaban Village. I am adding this information to help accurately map the village and its surrounding area on OpenStreetMap. Local knowledge an... commented 2026-09-22 21:51:46 UTC by DibyoX ♦1 |
| 189421737 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 188) | Възможно е номерата да са бл. 12 и 11, но сега не съм отворил кадастралните данни. commented 2026-09-22 21:50:34 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 184315874 (Comments: 1) | elliotsjoqvist (Discussed changesets: 9) | why did you change diet:vegan to yes? are there non vegan meals on the menu`? commented 2026-09-22 21:45:44 UTC by wombatmaper ♦116 |
| 189275464 (Comments: 1) | Travln1620 (Discussed changesets: 12) | I added back the roads you deleted. Please stop vandalizing the map. OSM maps features that exist on the ground not how you wish things were. Your repeated vandalism of motorized routes in Utah has been noted. Please stop. commented 2026-09-22 21:31:15 UTC by pmckay419 ♦20 |
| 189128640 (Comments: 3) | alojmm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-22 21:23:14 UTC by will l ♦6 |
| 189371618 (Comments: 1) | ClaireBotanist (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome back to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is ... commented 2026-09-22 21:18:58 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 189395701 (Comments: 1) | Arnold Bräunlich VII (Discussed changesets: 4) | Teilrevert mit changeset/189418486 , da die gelöschten WEA noch auf den Luftbildern sichtbar sind. Lebenszyklus angewendet. Hallo, bitte nichts löschen, was auf Luftbildern noch sichtbar ist. Sonst wird es u.U. von Luftbildmappern oh... commented 2026-09-22 21:02:26 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,465 |
| 189417548 (Comments: 1) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you have mapped many areas and tagged them with animal=horse_walker that do not look like horse walkers but like round pens, example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561425682 . Round pens are no horse walkers, see https://wiki.openstreetmap... commented 2026-09-22 21:00:59 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦913 |
| 189418441 (Comments: 5) | Jesse1337 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Eggie, Thanks zal mijn changes kleiner maken :) > Misschien zonder dat je het doorhebt. Dat was inderdaad het geval commented 2026-09-22 21:00:04 UTC by Jesse1337 ♦3 |
| 158023426 (Comments: 1) | gpetz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, a lot of the speed limits that were updated to 110 km/h in this changeset seem to still be at 100 km/h, and IIRC they were never changed to 110 (or planned to be) in the first place. commented 2026-09-22 20:58:19 UTC by cswilson252 ♦26 |
| 189418556 (Comments: 4) | Jesse1337 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Eggie, Check thanks! commented 2026-09-22 20:54:41 UTC by Jesse1337 ♦3 |
| 189408684 (Comments: 1) | Ivo Levenovičs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Are you sure this is oneway? I don't think oneway=yes + highway=unclassified is an often seen combination Same question for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189406193 commented 2026-09-22 20:46:58 UTC by markalex- ♦44 |
| 188565708 (Comments: 1) | Geim (Discussed changesets: 85) | Hoi Geim, Toch weer een mapper die alles naar de auto situatie intekende. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189418556 Ik krijg geen reactie. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-22 20:43:40 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189418620 (Comments: 1) | pctq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Welcome to OSM and good luck with mapping! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189418620 commented 2026-09-22 20:34:54 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189406032 (Comments: 3) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 143) | Oh, well that's an easy fix. I must have mislabeled that too, it should be using the post office tag. commented 2026-09-22 20:24:17 UTC by jorbit ♦2 |
| 189415354 (Comments: 1) | Jenna Bakker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-22 20:22:09 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189405332 (Comments: 1) | AlejandroGHL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Alejandro. El tag building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. Yo lo corrijo. Saludos commented 2026-09-22 20:20:28 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189405571 (Comments: 1) | AlejandroGHL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola Alejandro Buenas tardes Una duda: cual es el nombre del camino? porque oficialmente es el que quitaste. este tipo de cosas es mejor consultarlas antes. El camino que estaba antes (Camino Internacional Monseñor Fran... commented 2026-09-22 20:18:50 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 184459151 (Comments: 1) | momo779 (Discussed changesets: 2) | motor_vehicle destination is incorrect as passenger cars are allowed to pass without restrictions commented 2026-09-22 20:08:47 UTC by nailuj ♦1 |
| 189406613 (Comments: 1) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, Flock does not operate in Barcelona so please stop adding Flock to the manufacturer tag. commented 2026-09-22 20:07:04 UTC by marcmarti ♦106 |
| 185819927 (Comments: 1) | Sofia_111 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, where are these paths still named? I can't see any evidence for them having the names of the old roads, and indeed don't even exist as footpaths anymore but just parts of a pedestrian area. commented 2026-09-22 20:06:08 UTC by mstrbrid ♦67 |
| 187834326 (Comments: 3) | PwDB1aqE8v (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich kann das remote nicht beurteilen - Ich habe nur die routingänderung gesehen - ein highway=traffic_signals wird halt mit penalty hinterlegt im routing. ALso wie eine ampel die Statistisch 50% der Zeit Rot ist. Ist das hier der fall ode... commented 2026-09-22 19:58:24 UTC by flohoff ♦2,596 |
| 92661414 (Comments: 1) | msondergaard (Discussed changesets: 11) | I've been looking at Bovballe Skov using a height map. I suspect that water doesn't flow east through way/860387470, but instead south through node/8018801395, and eventually pumped into the sea through way/860371029. https://kortove... commented 2026-09-22 19:55:23 UTC by cyclist789 ♦126 |
 | 180190056 (Comments: 2) | MK 1 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello MK1, I wonder Your arguments. Both carrigeways between Katlanovo and Veles are signed and classified as motorways by the ЈАВНО ПРЕТПРИЈАТИЕ ЗА ДРЖАВНИ ПАТИШТА (see https://roads.org.mk/en/road-network/). And the... commented 2026-09-22 19:55:14 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦62 |
| 101457586 (Comments: 1) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 118) | Hello! Thanks for your contributions :) I noticed this viewpoint currently tagged as tourism=plane_spotting https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5469203190 I noticed it because it's the only usage in the world. I could maybe propo... commented 2026-09-22 19:24:01 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦53 |
| 189342677 (Comments: 4) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 211) | sorry für den dreifachen Kommentar. War keine Absicht. Bitte trotzdem um Korrektur. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189342677 commented 2026-09-22 19:22:26 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 188952227 (Comments: 1) | synergiaenergiapl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Obiekt został usunięty. Proszę o zapoznanie się z https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487 przed następną edycją. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-22 19:22:24 UTC by bartgron ♦664 |
| 189412492 (Comments: 1) | eric_1345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, thanks for adding details here! For the future, it's generally considered preferable to modify existing elements rather than deleting and redrawing them, like you did for the parking aisles and woods here. See https://wiki.openstreetma... commented 2026-09-22 19:19:18 UTC by willkmis ♦231 |
| 154968811 (Comments: 8) | literan (Discussed changesets: 207) | не пройти, закрытые ворона и есть охрана. я там не был, это информация от очевидца из заметок, я у него эти данные выуживал долго commented 2026-09-22 18:57:22 UTC by literan ♦7,236 |
| 189346367 (Comments: 1) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 121) | Why was the wheelchair tag set to no? There are no steps at both doors so it should be accessible to wheelchair users. commented 2026-09-22 18:57:02 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 188666679 (Comments: 3) | Volker Butterstein (Discussed changesets: 2) | I used one of more standard tags - the shop you added (thanks for doing it!) is now more likely to appear on maps commented 2026-09-22 18:55:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189372867 (Comments: 2) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 17) | My bad, reverted commented 2026-09-22 18:51:47 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦35 |
| 189414881 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 651) | work commented 2026-09-22 18:39:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189314118 (Comments: 1) | Dom1n1k_90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the changes have been made because the road to the "Klingenmühle" as well es the access to the hiking path leading to the valley have been damaged due to a landslide. The signs which has been installed by the private owner of the K... commented 2026-09-22 18:30:41 UTC by Dom1n1k_90 ♦1 |
| 47680364 (Comments: 2) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 230) | Fixed commented 2026-09-22 18:25:19 UTC by AgusQui ♦651 |
| 189414464 (Comments: 1) | Wise_Turtle (Discussed changesets: 10) | sourse=Esri commented 2026-09-22 18:24:21 UTC by Wise_Turtle ♦20 |
| 189404638 (Comments: 3) | KlJim (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het pad heb ik verbonden met de rijbaan. commented 2026-09-22 17:59:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189404694 (Comments: 2) | KlJim (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb de landuse losgemaakt. commented 2026-09-22 17:59:06 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189374090 (Comments: 3) | Quesadillor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je remarque qu'il y a deux changesets avec des modifications du même type. Je ne sais pourquoi StreetComplete a fait ce découpage, je n'ai téléversé mes modifications qu'une seule fois ce jour là... commented 2026-09-22 17:54:39 UTC by Quesadillor ♦2 |
| 189412376 (Comments: 6) | Frankoning (Discussed changesets: 4) | Eigenlijk had ik loc_name moeten taggen.. Zoals in de omgeving de boom bekend staat. Aangepast commented 2026-09-22 17:54:09 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 157164242 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | fixed. commented 2026-09-22 17:51:54 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 167135408 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | fixed. commented 2026-09-22 17:51:50 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 188764686 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | fixed. commented 2026-09-22 17:51:47 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 189368804 (Comments: 1) | CameronSW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for adding this to OSM! However this change came with a lot of problems, thank you for requesting a review as I've been able to fix a lot of it. Unfortunately you missed a few segments along the road you mapped so the spe... commented 2026-09-22 17:49:29 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189401867 (Comments: 3) | Frankoning (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2026-09-22 17:43:24 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189222371 (Comments: 3) | trigpoint (Discussed changesets: 79) | I've opened an issue, so we'll see if individual terraced houses can be added as an option https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/7143 commented 2026-09-22 17:39:32 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 189400819 (Comments: 5) | Frankoning (Discussed changesets: 4) | Maar ik ken niet veel bomen die een naam hebben! commented 2026-09-22 17:32:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 181455231 (Comments: 5) | Serenc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba @HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi bilgilendirmeniz için çok teşekkür ederim. Dediğiniz gibi Viki'ye örnek olacak bir hayvanat bahçesi olması ve bunun Anakara'dan olması benim de oldukça hoşuma ... commented 2026-09-22 17:32:23 UTC by keyyushi ♦36 |
 | 189361434 (Comments: 2) | ErawanFalls (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello rab, I appreciate your input and have rollbacked my edits until newer resources show otherwise. Thank you and happy mapping! commented 2026-09-22 17:29:23 UTC by ErawanFalls ♦1 |
| 187355428 (Comments: 2) | billatq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yup, fixed it. commented 2026-09-22 17:21:49 UTC by billatq ♦1 |
| 189391598 (Comments: 1) | Karel_Trachet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for adding new objects to the map but, when doing so, please make sure that you use recent aerial imagery. In the case of Brussels Capitale Region, those are usually CIRB/CIBG and Digitaal Vlaanderen most recent aerial ima... commented 2026-09-22 17:21:41 UTC by JuanjoMC ♦89 |
| 189407456 (Comments: 1) | arcas1111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revertí el cambio. No podés mapear un edificio que abarque un barrio entero para que en el mapa se vea del color que quieras. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración podé... commented 2026-09-22 17:18:58 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189375928 (Comments: 1) | Holic_Kuro (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello and welcome! Can you use slightly better changeset comments to describe your changes in OSM? Canada is a big place and "canada fix" doesn't mean much. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ... commented 2026-09-22 17:11:55 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦400 |
 | 189337299 (Comments: 1) | VMapp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1560997640. What is the mean of the tags Branch3 = Eldoret Town County2 = Uasin Gishu Feeder_o21 = ELDORET 1 33KV EX ELD132KV Length_m_ = 34.1929652728 OBJECTID = 26879 O... commented 2026-09-22 17:07:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,858 |
| 188389203 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thank you for these, they are indeed detailed building outlines. Just noting that I have fixed the building type for the terraces though, building=terrace is for when there is a whole row of unsplit houses, since these are individual houses I&... commented 2026-09-22 17:06:09 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 170574920 (Comments: 2) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 113) | Typo fixed. commented 2026-09-22 17:03:59 UTC by 5R-MFT ♦95 |
| 189372598 (Comments: 1) | Omar Amassine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14205286406. Please move the node to the right building. commented 2026-09-22 17:01:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,858 |
| 188417614 (Comments: 12) | Vinzenz Mai (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo! Jetzt sind ja alle im Boot, wie es aussieht … ich wollte auch nochmal was dazu sagen. Also das Thema und die Rodenhof-Situation sind ja wirklich komplex – und es gibt wahrscheinlich keine durchdiskutierte, akzeptierte ... commented 2026-09-22 16:52:52 UTC by goodidea ♦158 |
| 189409587 (Comments: 1) | JSAN_2018 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14206765022 (one of three hunderd twenty-three objects). What is the mean of the tags Div_nm_en = Ywa Htaung Division_N = 2.0 furlong = ၁/၂ id = 1 lbl_a = ဇော်... commented 2026-09-22 16:49:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,858 |
| 189221044 (Comments: 2) | birok (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv! Gnome Maps-ből szerkesztettem őket, ott nem láttam a kimaradt címkéket. Itt a webes felületen már látom mire gondolsz. Köszönöm, hogy jelezted és javítottad őket! A tan... commented 2026-09-22 16:43:07 UTC by birok ♦1 |
| 189396239 (Comments: 2) | Senihtu (Discussed changesets: 57) | niemand. Ich habe bei POIs, deren letzte Änderung weniger als ein Jahr zurück lag, die Syntax der Öffnungszeit verbessert- (Es fehlten führende Nullen). Das restliche tagging ist nicht von mir. Deepl.com: Nimeni. ... commented 2026-09-22 16:38:07 UTC by Senihtu ♦197 |
| 179853060 (Comments: 4) | MerDi (Discussed changesets: 7) | gute idee, erledigt. und genereller dank für deine quality assurance! commented 2026-09-22 16:37:44 UTC by MerDi ♦10 |
| 181560407 (Comments: 4) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 190) | Если на велосипеде, то - да. При выезде на шоссе 46К-8290 перелезать через отбойник. Он обозначен. commented 2026-09-22 16:32:12 UTC by neo-plan ♦114 |
| 188932682 (Comments: 6) | hsc666 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Wundert mich, denn ich meine Valhalla konnte mal "no_entry" (steht ja auch so auf der o.g. Wiki-Seite). Es gibt dazu aber zumindest ein Issue: https://github.com/valhalla/valhalla/issues/6187. commented 2026-09-22 16:22:31 UTC by aixbrick ♦940 |
| 189403845 (Comments: 16) | Jensbot (Discussed changesets: 1) | ah ok. Dan zet ik zowel de paden, parkeerplaats als de weg ernaartoe als permissive ipv private. Staat geen art 461 bord bij, dus dan maar zo. :) commented 2026-09-22 16:20:59 UTC by Jensbot ♦1 |
| 179322606 (Comments: 3) | itineris (Discussed changesets: 79) | maybe it is a bad balance but I really prefer to ask, sometimes ask even if I am sure that there is no other interpretation (and sometimes people disagree with my interpretation!) thanks for fix and mapping! commented 2026-09-22 16:11:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189194966 (Comments: 2) | tumtrahS (Discussed changesets: 12) | Habe noch etwas nachgearbeitet und vor allem den oberen Teil des Weges teilweise unter die Erde verlegt; so wie ich mich erinnere und so wie man es auch vom Luftbild aus erahnen kann. Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2026-09-22 16:05:38 UTC by tumtrahS ♦6 |
| 188605763 (Comments: 2) | Langenb1 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hola, Langenb1: He revisado los cambios [188605763](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188605763) y [189117570](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189117570), que dejaron abiertos los contornos de la [ZEC-ZEPA Alto Tajo](https://www.... commented 2026-09-22 16:03:37 UTC by CartoNex ♦14 |
| 189117570 (Comments: 1) | Langenb1 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hola, Langenb1: He revisado los cambios [188605763](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188605763) y [189117570](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189117570), que dejaron abiertos los contornos de la [ZEC-ZEPA Alto Tajo](https://www.... commented 2026-09-22 16:03:23 UTC by CartoNex ♦14 |
| 189362997 (Comments: 3) | Christopher Stouter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, awesome! Thank you for your work. commented 2026-09-22 16:01:43 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦17 |
| 189374798 (Comments: 2) | eastender (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi gurglypipe, Thank you for the question. To put my edit in context, Royal Mail originally installed Business Boxes, that we tagged in OSM as post_box:type=meter. Over the years, those Business Boxes have generally transitioned to Parcel Boxe... commented 2026-09-22 15:57:53 UTC by eastender ♦40 |
| 189388403 (Comments: 3) | diodaix (Discussed changesets: 9) | Semua node diambil dari history edit saya, jadi gaada bentrok dengan editor lain commented 2026-09-22 15:54:39 UTC by diodaix ♦12 |
| 189206713 (Comments: 3) | JRaffi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo ihr beiden, wir erfassen in OpenStreetMap alle existenten Wege und Gebäude. Ob das Einverständnis des Grundeigentümers vorliegt oder ob es sich um einen Schwarzbau handelt, spielt keine Rolle. Siehe hierzu auch https://wik... commented 2026-09-22 15:49:42 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,274 |
| 189302024 (Comments: 2) | ironspock (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hallo JochenOSM, diesbezüglich gibt es in den Wikis auch andere Informationen... siehe Tagging Rooftop solar panels https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar commented 2026-09-22 15:39:08 UTC by ironspock ♦45 |
| 188905171 (Comments: 1) | Taksine (Discussed changesets: 52) | Additional note: I have removed certain buildings that do not actually exist and would not look like that. commented 2026-09-22 15:29:56 UTC by Taksine ♦178 |
| 188807095 (Comments: 1) | EZ2027 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 居民区名称错误，已删除。既然都画区域了，为什么不补一下建筑？ commented 2026-09-22 15:28:44 UTC by フーヴァー リー ♦27 |
| 186733602 (Comments: 2) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Yes, it is a typo. commented 2026-09-22 15:08:03 UTC by maxolasersquad ♦97 |
| 158315474 (Comments: 1) | VLD314 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! You used crossing:markings=pictogram on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/431394191/history Have you maybe meant crossing:markings=pictograms ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just r... commented 2026-09-22 15:07:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 160319114 (Comments: 1) | VLD190 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello! You used crossing:markings=pictogram on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6992693319/history Have you maybe meant crossing:markings=pictograms ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just ... commented 2026-09-22 15:07:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 158355491 (Comments: 1) | VLD314 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! You used crossing:markings=pictogram on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7047107741/history Have you maybe meant crossing:markings=pictograms ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just ... commented 2026-09-22 15:07:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187394029 (Comments: 1) | RK SALES CORPORATION BARAMATI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used shop = COMPUTER SHOP on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14092227553/history Have you maybe meant shop=computer ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-09-22 15:07:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 152078722 (Comments: 3) | Aiman (Discussed changesets: 18) | Done commented 2026-09-22 15:06:56 UTC by Aiman ♦8 |
| 82678556 (Comments: 1) | aleksiy68 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! You used shop=fireplace;door on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1712942598/history Have you maybe meant shop=fireplace;doors ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-09-22 15:06:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178098096 (Comments: 1) | Adam43245 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used shop=game_shop on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13006050833/history Have you maybe meant shop=games ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-22 15:06:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 58095779 (Comments: 2) | OceanVortex (Discussed changesets: 11) | Just a typo, I guess. I've fixed it. commented 2026-09-22 15:06:03 UTC by OceanVortex ♦20 |
 | 117574043 (Comments: 1) | ig4map (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello! You used shop=clothes;sport on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9517105535/history Have you maybe meant shop=clothes;sports ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edit... commented 2026-09-22 15:05:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 88333925 (Comments: 1) | donuzium (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used shop=music;book on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304928448/history Have you maybe meant shop=music;books ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ... commented 2026-09-22 15:05:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 38730919 (Comments: 1) | Yod4z (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello! You used shop=bathroom_furnishing;tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2497226701/history Have you maybe meant shop=bathroom_furnishing;tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to j... commented 2026-09-22 15:04:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 164613756 (Comments: 1) | bob3bob3 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello! You used shop=furniture;electrical;electronic;appliance on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8019782392/history Have you maybe meant shop=furniture;electrical;electronics;appliance ? I am pretty sure that it i... commented 2026-09-22 15:04:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 85435980 (Comments: 1) | TsukuMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used shop=video;music;video_game;book on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7537250178/history Have you maybe meant shop=video;music;video_games;books ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enou... commented 2026-09-22 15:03:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 97331693 (Comments: 1) | JriSv250 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hello! You used shop=candle;cosmetics on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8313186666/history Have you maybe meant shop=candles;cosmetics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (... commented 2026-09-22 15:02:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189360909 (Comments: 1) | Cares8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please make the shapes match the building footprints. That's the whole reason why OSM hasn't blind-imported Bing's building detections, the shape is important. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Pub... commented 2026-09-22 15:02:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 169738271 (Comments: 1) | Cyril5C (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used shop=vacan on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83896374/history Have you maybe meant shop=vacant ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-22 15:02:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 164517333 (Comments: 1) | ironalloy (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! You used shop=book on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3740370927/history Have you maybe meant shop=books ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 15:01:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 157128659 (Comments: 1) | claudia10 (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello! You used shop=sport on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11759205061/history Have you maybe meant shop=sports ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects... commented 2026-09-22 15:01:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 159249793 (Comments: 1) | Xavizard Knight (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! You used craft=glazier on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12348642222/history Have you maybe meant craft=glaziery ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178447705 (Comments: 1) | FensterGlazing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used craft=glazier on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13545593742/history Have you maybe meant craft=glaziery ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 144436347 (Comments: 1) | countrymouse (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7332028633/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 51693573 (Comments: 1) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077122147/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 3181241 (Comments: 1) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/568121368/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 6316381 (Comments: 1) | BN1228 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/981662437/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-22 14:58:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 15369289 (Comments: 1) | 123maps (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2202651327/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:58:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 37557546 (Comments: 1) | Velocimaptor (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4035743985/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:58:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 109650219 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 230) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9005303198/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:58:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178151353 (Comments: 1) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! You used toll=None on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474493431/history Have you maybe meant toll=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where ... commented 2026-09-22 14:56:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189403655 (Comments: 1) | Luther69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej. Undlad venligst at tilføje adresseoplysninger på bygninger. Adresser importeres og vedligeholdes automatisk på separate punkter. På forhånd tak. commented 2026-09-22 14:54:03 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,927 |
| 187361926 (Comments: 1) | Waldmax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used substance=ga on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14090612324/history Have you maybe meant substance=gas ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-22 14:53:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
 | 8095794 (Comments: 1) | senatusgesner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used shower=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1278502287/history Have you maybe meant shower=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wher... commented 2026-09-22 14:53:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 80221526 (Comments: 1) | eKickbike (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used seamark:small_craft_facility:category=fuel_station. on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7167738014/history Have you maybe meant seamark:small_craft_facility:category=fuel_station ? I am pretty sure t... commented 2026-09-22 14:53:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 168974243 (Comments: 1) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 211) | Hello! You used parking:right=streetside on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287801392/history Have you maybe meant parking:right=street_side ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace... commented 2026-09-22 14:49:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 146682553 (Comments: 1) | Jon Hanson (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used parking:right=streetside on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391846966/history Have you maybe meant parking:right=street_side ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace ... commented 2026-09-22 14:49:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189402357 (Comments: 5) | spclouwers (Discussed changesets: 2) | Adres 17a verplaatst naar gebouw dat bereikbaar is vanaf de Oranjestraat. Dit is de Frederikstraat. commented 2026-09-22 14:42:53 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189189139 (Comments: 1) | MOHAMMED_IBRAHIM_KOJO (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi MOHAMMED_IBRAHIM_KOJO, the buildings you added are well mapped, but the highways you changed to residential are not residential. Footway was the correct value for those. commented 2026-09-22 14:29:44 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦187 |
| X | 189365529 (Comments: 1) | GeoguyEli (Discussed changesets: 1) | While the changeset is impressive - please be a bit more localized and iterative :) the changes are stretched along the globe commented 2026-09-22 14:28:38 UTC by Lopatin Dmytro ♦1 |
| 189400026 (Comments: 2) | spclouwers (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tip.. Probeer in 1 x op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. Ik heb wat samengevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-22 14:24:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189400584 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 172) | Dzięki! commented 2026-09-22 14:23:35 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦944 |
| 168633518 (Comments: 1) | KurtEnKristel (Discussed changesets: 15) | Is het kleine schuine doorsteekje van het ene pad naar het andere echt een privaat stuk? Omdat het als privaat gemarkeerd staat laten routeplanners niet toe om langs daar bv een looptochtje te doen. commented 2026-09-22 14:23:02 UTC by RingoDS ♦2 |
| 189392224 (Comments: 5) | Marco_030 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-22 14:22:10 UTC by Marco_030 ♦5 |
| 189375696 (Comments: 1) | MaunaLoaMountain (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thats a service road --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189375696 commented 2026-09-22 14:19:56 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189084995 (Comments: 1) | P1OT4_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Proszę o przywrócenie obiektu. Służy on od wielu lat turystom. Usuwanie istniejących obiektów dla własnych korzyści jest nieetyczne. commented 2026-09-22 14:13:45 UTC by Beskidnick ♦2 |
| 189359551 (Comments: 2) | molensteen (Discussed changesets: 47) | dankjewel eggie, goede toevoeging commented 2026-09-22 14:10:46 UTC by molensteen ♦46 |
| 189377539 (Comments: 1) | MooseheadLake (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. That is a service road --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189377539 commented 2026-09-22 14:01:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189373231 (Comments: 2) | josephantonyj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sure. Thanks. commented 2026-09-22 13:59:13 UTC by josephantonyj ♦1 |
| 189301437 (Comments: 6) | Esperteyo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revertido en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189401197 commented 2026-09-22 13:50:39 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦351 |
| 189300517 (Comments: 2) | Esperteyo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revertido en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189401197 commented 2026-09-22 13:50:34 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦351 |
| 189253249 (Comments: 3) | Howpper (Discussed changesets: 207) | You can change it for now if you want. commented 2026-09-22 13:41:49 UTC by Howpper ♦122 |
| 188983687 (Comments: 2) | mcsteven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah streetcomplete does have descriptions for "house" and "terraced house" exactly as you stated, my mistake (I assumed it was a looser specification, as with "residential"). Thanks for the clarification. commented 2026-09-22 13:41:05 UTC by mcsteven ♦1 |
| 189383744 (Comments: 1) | DodaBettaMountain (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. That's a service street, I'll fix it. regards commented 2026-09-22 13:39:24 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189388826 (Comments: 1) | revent (Discussed changesets: 17) | This version actually comes closest to matching the ground truth (just use the correct separator on ref). The newer version as an area is an unusual way to map runways and goes off into the trees. --- Pu... commented 2026-09-22 13:35:10 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189347725 (Comments: 11) | gemeente Harderwijk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Goedendag Harderwijk, is er nog een verbinding van woonhuis nummer 1 met het G13 fietspad? Vanwege plaats op de weg mogen voetgangers naast een G13 niet op de rijbaan lopen, dus die moeten oversteken. commented 2026-09-22 13:34:05 UTC by Allroads ♦467 |
| 189392192 (Comments: 1) | revent (Discussed changesets: 17) | It should be noted that references are separated by ; in OSM, even if the FAA doesn't do it that way. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189392192 commented 2026-09-22 13:32:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189371500 (Comments: 4) | Sorphis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahhh, excelente, no sabía que existía esa opción. Gracias por la modificación. commented 2026-09-22 13:23:07 UTC by Sorphis ♦1 |
| 189340739 (Comments: 1) | jewadin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Macht es wirklich Sinn hier überhaupt Öffnungszeiten einzutragen? Scheint ja nicht auf Publikumsverkehr abzuzielen und "Mo-So" ist nicht wirklich aussagekräftig. PS: Korrekt wäre Englisch "Mo-Su". commented 2026-09-22 13:14:59 UTC by LingM ♦19 |
| 189397473 (Comments: 1) | krbg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia. 1. Honnan származnak a magasságok? 2. Nincs olyan hogy fél szint: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels#Values 3. Töröltél egy emléktáblát, visszaá... commented 2026-09-22 13:12:36 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 172213883 (Comments: 1) | elwwan (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13158337867/history so is tree or shrub? or have you meant that it is shrub that can/will/could grow into a tree? commented 2026-09-22 13:00:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189111872 (Comments: 1) | dzidek23 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, thanks for this, I just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261873505 and wanted to point out that building=terrace is for a whole row of an unsplit terrace. The individual houses should be building=house + house=terraced, which I've ... commented 2026-09-22 12:58:47 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 189309664 (Comments: 5) | straßenfutzi (Discussed changesets: 3) | bitte sei etwas vorsichtig, sowohl mit deinen Edits als auch deinen Aussagen commented 2026-09-22 12:57:19 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 172665910 (Comments: 1) | ClarSco (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi ClarSco, About a year ago, you added various information to a number of railway stations in the Glasgow area. This included adding brand=Scotland's Railway and brand:wikidata=Q136406287 . The wikidata entry for Q136406287 has si... commented 2026-09-22 12:51:55 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦344 |
| 189396360 (Comments: 2) | EddyEvergreen (Discussed changesets: 2) | I put the name at the building_shape now instead of the addressnode. So you will see the name on the map. Gr eggie commented 2026-09-22 12:42:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189395028 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Mostly looks good - I've corrected the spelling of Guinness. commented 2026-09-22 12:41:15 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189394511 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Interesting! Changeset looks good, I've just removed the full stop from the end of the name. commented 2026-09-22 12:36:49 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189393041 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | It looks like you changed the entire car park into a charging station here, so I've turned it into a car park again with a separate node inside the car park tagged as a charging station. commented 2026-09-22 12:33:49 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 188525221 (Comments: 4) | Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ik heb nog een aanpassing gedaan aan het fietspad tot aan de Vestastraat, dus het zou nu goed moeten komen. Morgen kan ik controleren in LIVENAV. commented 2026-09-22 12:28:26 UTC by Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) ♦12 |
| 186643579 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 98) | Thank you very much. I've actually implemented such practice since then. I missed this one. commented 2026-09-22 12:23:28 UTC by Access Claims (komoot) ♦87 |
| 175054895 (Comments: 3) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 237) | Nie wiem czemu tak jest. Docelowo tu będzie motorway, więc zmieniłem na motorway commented 2026-09-22 12:15:27 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦944 |
| 189248495 (Comments: 17) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 102) | If you add the `building=yes` tag to the perimeter, you'll get a “building-within-a-building” warning and duplicate segments. commented 2026-09-22 12:13:51 UTC by Map47 ♦53 |
| 189391067 (Comments: 1) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 53) | In DK use SDFI Aerial Imagery, Bing and others are outdated. Yesterday you made use of Google Streetview, that not legal https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?search=google&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go commented 2026-09-22 12:13:41 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,927 |
| 189393099 (Comments: 5) | KivaGeo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi.. It's okay like this!. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-09-22 12:12:57 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189345688 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 123) | It had seen some use before but has recently been documented on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahouse%3Dback-to-back I've recently found a lot more examples of existing houses which were missing a house tag and where th... commented 2026-09-22 12:08:24 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 189391485 (Comments: 1) | TallebudgeraValley (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. The smaller road to the house is totally a service. Ill fix it. regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189391485 commented 2026-09-22 11:59:58 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189395496 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 24) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-09-22 11:59:10 UTC by sahshoor ♦31 |
| 165004418 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 172) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5532956 commented 2026-09-22 11:58:53 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦944 |
| 189395158 (Comments: 1) | KivaGeo (Discussed changesets: 3) | En als je CTRL f5 toetst zie je direct het effect. commented 2026-09-22 11:56:57 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189346403 (Comments: 2) | Jan Hintelmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Schulle, bin neu hier. Werde ich in Zukunft berücksichtigen. Mir war im ersten Moment nicht klar, dass ich den Fehler selbst beheben kann. commented 2026-09-22 11:56:17 UTC by Jan Hintelmann ♦1 |
| 181723327 (Comments: 3) | lupien (Discussed changesets: 23) | Het blijken G13 fietspaden te zijn met een beetje misleidende naam Voetpad xy . Lokale mapper heeft e.e.a. aangepast naar G13. Groet, eggie commented 2026-09-22 11:55:08 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 177729523 (Comments: 1) | Cricri93160 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bonjour, pourquoi avoir indiqué oneway=yes sur la rue Rouget de l'Isle ? Après vérification sur le terrain, il s'avère que cette section est bien à double-sens, avec la présence d'un panneau A1... commented 2026-09-22 11:53:48 UTC by LaTêteDansLeGuidon ♦9 |
| 189342414 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 88) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189395230 commented 2026-09-22 11:51:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189390569 (Comments: 10) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Tja.. roeien met de riemen die je hebt. Gaat ook. commented 2026-09-22 11:49:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189326869 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189394852 commented 2026-09-22 11:47:16 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189289659 (Comments: 2) | Muhmaker (Discussed changesets: 39) | Kein Problem. Die ICE Linie 43 werde ich mir demnächst nochmal anschauen. Ich habe Hinweise gefunden, dass die meistens zwischen Basel und Hamburg verkehrt. Ich suche aber noch verlässlichere Fahrplan Informationen. Hast du zufällig ei... commented 2026-09-22 11:40:32 UTC by Muhmaker ♦153 |
| 189242774 (Comments: 2) | bruha (Discussed changesets: 1) | done by mistake, can be deleted commented 2026-09-22 11:34:25 UTC by bruha ♦1 |
| 187841972 (Comments: 1) | SalliSiiri45 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, here too, their website includes "Catholic" in their name, is that not how it's signed on the ground? commented 2026-09-22 11:30:54 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 188161855 (Comments: 1) | SalliSiiri45 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, thanks for your update. I'm interested in this because on the school's website they have their name as "Robins Lane Community Primary School" and their street as "Kinmel Street", even though "Robins Lane" w... commented 2026-09-22 11:29:52 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦471 |
| 188089196 (Comments: 3) | rild leka (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello rild leka, I do not see the southern carriageway to be open on street photos of April 2026. Do You have a source, where the opening of this second carriageway sometime during this summer is documented? Thanks, Anca commented 2026-09-22 11:28:56 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦62 |
| 189393170 (Comments: 1) | Routebureau Utrecht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-22 11:21:13 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189393107 (Comments: 1) | bp86 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dlaczego dodajesz bicycle=yes do chodnika? Po tym chodniku nie można jechać rowerem. commented 2026-09-22 11:12:33 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,488 |
| 189322354 (Comments: 1) | Feisty_Wench (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189393284 commented 2026-09-22 11:10:13 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189327316 (Comments: 1) | kartalgunduz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189393183 commented 2026-09-22 11:08:49 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 183406591 (Comments: 1) | Aprillax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich möchte fragen woher der etwas ungewöhnliche Name "44er" kommt. Gibt es ein Schild auf dem das drauf steht? Wenn es nur lokal von Einheimischen so genannt wird (loc_name) wäre das auch sehr untypisch, dass ein e... commented 2026-09-22 11:07:51 UTC by sembelst134 ♦65 |
| 189392492 (Comments: 1) | Marco_030 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hoi Marco, accesstaggging is lastig. access=private Dat zou kunnen. dat stopt alles. bicycle=designated zetten we niet op een fietspad en klopt niet met private. Ik heb nu tot de slagboom bicycle en foot= permissive getagd. Dat... commented 2026-09-22 11:05:29 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189345614 (Comments: 4) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 44) | Dziękuję za wyjaśnienie, będę bardziej uważać. commented 2026-09-22 10:53:55 UTC by palycka ♦4 |
| 189391937 (Comments: 1) | krbg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia. Lehetőleg innen válassz building:material értéket: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:material commented 2026-09-22 10:44:31 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189313558 (Comments: 3) | KonsPana81 (Discussed changesets: 7) | See changeset #189392110. commented 2026-09-22 10:42:48 UTC by KonsPana81 ♦7 |
| 189390746 (Comments: 1) | dotty lottie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189390746 commented 2026-09-22 10:42:25 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189095513 (Comments: 3) | supaluminal (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by changeset/189392066 as an undiscussed import of CC BY 4.0 data without a waiver. If you'd like to see this included in OSM, I think best to ensure the licensing issues are resolved first, then discussed... commented 2026-09-22 10:41:38 UTC by aharvey ♦1,994 |
| 189388534 (Comments: 1) | krbg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia. A https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:material címkében főleg azt jelöljük, hogy az épület homlokzata, tehát nem a falazat hanem a legkülső látható réteg milyen... commented 2026-09-22 10:37:53 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189193339 (Comments: 6) | InfosReseaux (Discussed changesets: 28) | Here's how to create a new item: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_items#Method_2_-_OSM_wiki_webpage_-_Special:NewItem I did that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q24018 You might want to update the URL once y... commented 2026-09-22 10:37:27 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 189390853 (Comments: 1) | Dedham Pharmacy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thank you for contributing to OSM and welcome! Unfortunately I've marked this changeset bad and fixed some problems. See this changeset for updates I've made: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189391632 The `building=hos... commented 2026-09-22 10:36:55 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
 | 189345257 (Comments: 1) | eurolatam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189391914 commented 2026-09-22 10:36:15 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189385618 (Comments: 2) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Changes look good! Updated the alignment using the OSM UK Cadastral parcels. If there is charging here could be worth adding a `amenity=charging_station`? Welcome to OSM and feel free to reply with any questions or concerns. ... commented 2026-09-22 10:23:47 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189366607 (Comments: 1) | Ibrahimaseye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189391328 commented 2026-09-22 10:22:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189384736 (Comments: 3) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I've done a partial revert of this changeset, undoing the tree movements (changeset/189391149). commented 2026-09-22 10:20:10 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189387363 (Comments: 7) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | area yes hoeft ook niet.. foutmelding. Of je begint met natural= water water=basin of je begint met landuse=basin basin=.. Het is verwarrend De foutmelding is nu natural=water ontbreekt. commented 2026-09-22 10:19:05 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189350045 (Comments: 1) | Madx321XLR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189390880 commented 2026-09-22 10:16:03 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189385791 (Comments: 1) | HVF-Stu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ty for adding these details! Mapping community resources like this is really important work! I've updated the name to remove the C.I.C. from the end of the name as it seems that isn't on any of the branding. The name tag is for what ... commented 2026-09-22 10:16:01 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189341945 (Comments: 1) | Hoàng Thị Tuw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189390504 commented 2026-09-22 10:06:13 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 178050327 (Comments: 1) | shadowrootdev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, attention, avec ta modif tu as déplacé le bar "up stairs" par erreur. C'est corrigé maintenant. commented 2026-09-22 09:56:26 UTC by BaboucheVerte ♦66 |
| 184449844 (Comments: 1) | planetpal (Discussed changesets: 1) | genus = sugar maple ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus taxon:en = sugar maple would be better, right? Unless you would prefer other tag? commented 2026-09-22 09:54:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189387988 (Comments: 3) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Wellicht is storage_tank (kijk naar de spelling) ook niet de juiste tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water commented 2026-09-22 09:53:25 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189385261 (Comments: 2) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you. commented 2026-09-22 09:48:00 UTC by guy4159 ♦4 |
| 188718272 (Comments: 2) | Boustro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah je connaissais pas, je regarderais la prochaine fois sur SC. Merci pour la correction ! commented 2026-09-22 09:44:53 UTC by Boustro ♦1 |
| 189309765 (Comments: 2) | straßenfutzi (Discussed changesets: 3) | gvgl. auch How to map Autofahrerclub/Pannendienst https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/A commented 2026-09-22 09:44:51 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189219744 (Comments: 1) | LEDFlighter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, was hat es mit diesem Gebäude auf sich? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46824514 Laut Kommentar eine Ruine, laut Tags gleichzeitig ein Bordell und ein Caterer... commented 2026-09-22 09:41:09 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 189388311 (Comments: 1) | Rickert05 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-22 09:40:07 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189309541 (Comments: 1) | straßenfutzi (Discussed changesets: 3) | warum hast du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9486105887 die healthcare:speciality entfernt? Bitte Telefonnummer im richtigen Format taggen. commented 2026-09-22 09:31:14 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 188241759 (Comments: 13) | HellMap (Discussed changesets: 111) | Then stream it is commented 2026-09-22 09:08:23 UTC by evdence ♦42 |
| 189182826 (Comments: 1) | Globeflower (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for sorting this out! commented 2026-09-22 09:07:19 UTC by TuukkaH ♦4 |
| 182335993 (Comments: 1) | azteckat (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hey, it seems when a shop changes you are deleting the object in OSM and creating a new one. This isn't ideal because it can lose data and metadata. In this case you deleted "Hidden Beauty" and added "vacant shop". In ... commented 2026-09-22 09:05:46 UTC by CjMalone ♦256 |
 | 189080797 (Comments: 1) | Zuzanna Szklarz (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi. I used this changeset to review your latest mappings. Best regards commented 2026-09-22 09:00:07 UTC by Frans S ♦11,030 |
| 189385124 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Changes look good! commented 2026-09-22 08:57:12 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 189364372 (Comments: 1) | macs620 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189386869 commented 2026-09-22 08:56:40 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189234841 (Comments: 2) | Leo973147 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, D'accord, pardon je n'avais pas vu. Merci commented 2026-09-22 08:55:21 UTC by Leo973147 ♦2 |
| 183552593 (Comments: 2) | KZ8 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Buongiorno, Non capisco onestamente a che name si riferisca, ma se ho commesso un errore accetto volentieri le eventuali correzioni. Grazie commented 2026-09-22 08:42:54 UTC by KZ8 ♦1 |
| 92844338 (Comments: 1) | msondergaard (Discussed changesets: 11) | node/8032788215 According to the address point node/964098209, only that residence is called Vindeby Udflytter. But I don't know how reliable that system is. commented 2026-09-22 08:42:23 UTC by cyclist789 ♦126 |
| 189354350 (Comments: 2) | Hermawan S (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, halte yang ada sekarang adalah halte Harmony Temporer. Halte yang lama sudah tidak ada. Saya berpikir, bila nanti halte baru sudah ada, bisa dimasukkan kembali sesuai kondisi dilapangan. Termasuk jembatan penyebrangan, dsb. Bila saya tidak sengaj... commented 2026-09-22 08:37:39 UTC by Hermawan S ♦1 |
| 189289352 (Comments: 2) | BrummsLee (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hallo Andreas! Bitte gern geschehen... das passiert uns aber allen... 😉 Wollte hier nicht erst lange hin und her korrespondieren und hab deswegen gleich selbst Hand angelegt... 😇 Liebe Grüße! commented 2026-09-22 08:31:22 UTC by BrummsLee ♦67 |
| 189385329 (Comments: 1) | mircearo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. Te rog foloseste diacritice cand adaugi denumiri. commented 2026-09-22 08:29:00 UTC by rarad74 ♦574 |
| 189385601 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 7) | source=local knowledge;aerial imagery commented 2026-09-22 08:28:33 UTC by h234a2hm ♦7 |
| 187252036 (Comments: 4) | bielebog (Discussed changesets: 114) | Top commented 2026-09-22 08:24:24 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189203054 (Comments: 2) | Sergei Amuzinski (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, Baloo Uriza! Thanks for the feedback. I see your point, but I am not sure it would be appropriate to map this as a culvert. The existing way is an administrative boundary, not a waterway. The OSM Wiki describes tunnel=culvert as being used ... commented 2026-09-22 08:18:24 UTC by Sergei Amuzinski ♦10 |
| 189379642 (Comments: 1) | PetrazzoPaola (Discussed changesets: 5) | Su OSM lo standard per i civici che hanno all'esponente una lettera è quella di riportarla minuscola, senza barra --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189379642 ... commented 2026-09-22 08:10:23 UTC by fabiotofy ♦336 |
| 189301871 (Comments: 3) | GIOCAL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. Si benissimo. Perfetto. Rivedrei eventualmente un'attimo il sac_scale: non conosco il percorso, ma è così impegnativo? Riferisciti a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale . Ottimo lavoro. commented 2026-09-22 08:10:20 UTC by LucianoC63 ♦7 |
| 189382813 (Comments: 1) | 3lackhawk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fent volt már. commented 2026-09-22 07:59:12 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 142761276 (Comments: 3) | jvazquel_sitna-import (Discussed changesets: 38) | see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162773095 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162379805 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166341534 commented 2026-09-22 07:57:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 162773095 (Comments: 1) | Raquel-garcia-import (Discussed changesets: 16) | Where this import was discussed? osm.wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n_de_datos_del_SITNA mentions that import (done here!) is in preliminary stages asked already in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142761276 commented 2026-09-22 07:57:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 162379805 (Comments: 1) | ManuelGonzalez-import (Discussed changesets: 3) | Where this import was discussed? osm.wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n_de_datos_del_SITNA mentions that import (done here!) is in preliminary stages asked already in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142761276 commented 2026-09-22 07:57:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 166341534 (Comments: 1) | MarisaRuiz-import (Discussed changesets: 2) | Where this import was discussed? osm.wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n_de_datos_del_SITNA mentions that import (done here!) is in preliminary stages asked already in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142761276 commented 2026-09-22 07:57:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189375695 (Comments: 2) | szkwok (Discussed changesets: 10) | 2. Don't create `highway=crossing` on `=sidewalk` commented 2026-09-22 07:46:41 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,050 |
| 189383557 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 651) | delete roads not fix poi ops commented 2026-09-22 07:44:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 186233414 (Comments: 9) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | 1. `*:webiste=` is established from `webiste=` . But `linkedin=` is not, only `contact:linkedin=` is. Both of the most numerous `brand:facebook=` and `operator:facebook=` had bulk additions. `operator:*=` is first established for language suffixes. <... commented 2026-09-22 07:42:24 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,050 |
| 188390891 (Comments: 2) | asHOne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi asHOne, this error still exits, can I get your feedback here? Guido commented 2026-09-22 07:25:41 UTC by gscholz ♦2,996 |
| 188930773 (Comments: 2) | marcuv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, I was testing mapping with Vespucci and I didn't understand how to add the description using that tool. IMO sending a message saying "disrepectful to the community" won't motivate new people to contribute. A more ben... commented 2026-09-22 07:25:16 UTC by marcuv ♦2 |
| 189339960 (Comments: 2) | Jesús Gómez (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hola. Lo mejor va a ser eliminar esa etiqueta. Son datos que valoraba no perder pero está visto que no se corresponden con el modelo digital del terreno del IGN. De hecho, la cueva que comentas es una de las que más dudas tengo... commented 2026-09-22 07:20:41 UTC by Jesús Gómez ♦42 |
| 189107779 (Comments: 2) | Corinne BEM (Discussed changesets: 6) | @habi Ja, dass sieht nach einer Auftragsarbeit des BEM für Bernmobi aus. Mit Rückmeldung war aber eventuell auch ein Kommentar von mir gemeint den ich auf zwei der neuen Ways von ihr Hinterlassen habe. Das Perron-Polygon der Kante... commented 2026-09-22 07:18:48 UTC by glaesel ♦13 |
| 189138891 (Comments: 2) | BlinkMaps (Discussed changesets: 4) | В данном случае крыша имеет другую форму, а ее часть дополнительно разделена на несколько перепадов по высоте. Из-за такой геометрии вок... commented 2026-09-22 07:16:47 UTC by BlinkMaps ♦4 |
| 189293084 (Comments: 1) | swaree (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hola swaree, els busos exprés.cat al estar integrats dins de l'ATM haurien de tenir l'etiqueta network de l'ATM i network:bus d'exprés.cat, al estar agrupats sota aquesta marca. no calia corregir totes les alertes qu... commented 2026-09-22 07:11:12 UTC by marcmarti ♦106 |
| 179172400 (Comments: 1) | Heidutzek Tim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ist "Obere Kohlenriedalm" wirklich eine touristische, bewirtschaftete Schutzhütte, auf der man als Gast übernachten und Essen kann? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut commented 2026-09-22 07:11:00 UTC by Andreas Binder ♦265 |
| 189351059 (Comments: 2) | nicola_alle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hai ragione, non ci ho pensato. Dovrei aver corretto. commented 2026-09-22 07:08:03 UTC by nicola_alle ♦1 |
| 189363369 (Comments: 1) | eri jahai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189381755 commented 2026-09-22 06:57:49 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189381378 (Comments: 1) | Ajuntament (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gràcies per mantenir OSM, deveu ser l'únic ajuntament que he vist fer-ho commented 2026-09-22 06:54:32 UTC by marcmarti ♦106 |
| 189346798 (Comments: 4) | Tornado112 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, Danke für die Hinweise, werde ich beim nächsten mal beachten ;) Tatsächlich ja! Bei uns zumindest im Landkreis, gibt es die Löschwasserständer mit Anschluss an die Druckleitung :) Sie sind ein "... commented 2026-09-22 06:51:12 UTC by Tornado112 ♦1 |
| 189371508 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189381443 commented 2026-09-22 06:48:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189244971 (Comments: 2) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 94) | I think you are partially right. The paths inside the terminal building that you reach through a door (the 3 entrances mapped; I added one on the underpass from the railway station) are indeed indoor corridors. But others are definitely outdoors (tho... commented 2026-09-22 06:42:37 UTC by rhhs ♦239 |
| 189366168 (Comments: 1) | Mirditor22 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189381123 commented 2026-09-22 06:39:31 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189380833 (Comments: 1) | RobbertP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-22 06:37:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189372020 (Comments: 1) | Woazboat (Discussed changesets: 11) | Mmm. Oh. Good pie. Yeah. commented 2026-09-22 06:36:54 UTC by marcmarti ♦106 |
| 189371177 (Comments: 2) | javroi199 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merged info commented 2026-09-22 06:34:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189352757 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Edits reverted, addr:street ergänzt die es nicht gibt, addr:housenumber in den name; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189302329; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379404 commented 2026-09-22 06:30:06 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189329086 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Edits reverted, addr:street ergänzt die es nicht gibt, addr:housenumber in den name; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189302329; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379404 commented 2026-09-22 06:29:52 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 189333780 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Edits reverted, addr:street ergänzt die es nicht gibt, addr:housenumber in den name; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189302329; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379404 commented 2026-09-22 06:29:49 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 189353083 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Edits reverted, addr:street ergänzt die es nicht gibt, addr:housenumber in den name; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189302329; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379404 commented 2026-09-22 06:29:40 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 70389111 (Comments: 5) | kombe1207 (Discussed changesets: 7) | The link to the project can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/METEOR_Project_in_Tanzania commented 2026-09-22 06:13:54 UTC by kombe1207 ♦2 |
| 189334784 (Comments: 2) | OSMchik (Discussed changesets: 41) | Кирпича нет, все поправил. Спасибо! commented 2026-09-22 06:09:51 UTC by OSMchik ♦27 |
| 189358278 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Edits reverted, addr:street ergänzt die es nicht gibt, addr:housenumber in den name; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189302329; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379404 commented 2026-09-22 06:05:38 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 189131560 (Comments: 1) | Mules_510 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thanks for your contributions. I noticed a small thing that I wanted to let you know about. You've added the "lazy river" tag to a few swimming pools that aren't lazy rivers. They're a pretty particular thing. For ... commented 2026-09-22 06:04:45 UTC by watmildon ♦319 |
| 189335927 (Comments: 1) | Mohammadd02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379908 commented 2026-09-22 06:03:47 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189370328 (Comments: 1) | Marco_030 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag Marco, Wellicht gewoon access=private?.. en dan zonder al die accesstags. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-22 06:01:39 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189364346 (Comments: 1) | macs620 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379572 commented 2026-09-22 05:52:37 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189314228 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379453 commented 2026-09-22 05:51:14 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189338631 (Comments: 2) | philippfeind (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für die Anregung. Dort ist die komplette Straße offen und deswegen auch keine Durchfahrt für Rettungsmittel möglich. Für uns ist es halt wichtig da unsere Rettungsmittel mit dieser Karte navigiert werden. ... commented 2026-09-22 05:49:54 UTC by philippfeind ♦1 |
| 189378952 (Comments: 1) | FlowPlumbingSolutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you place this over the building your business operates from and not on the roadway remote from that address. commented 2026-09-22 05:44:51 UTC by nevw ♦2,348 |
| 189333757 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Edits reverted, addr:street ergänzt die es nicht gibt, addr:housenumber in den name; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189302329 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379351 commented 2026-09-22 05:43:47 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 189330756 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Edits reverted, addr:street ergänzt die es nicht gibt, addr:housenumber in den name; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189302329 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379343 commented 2026-09-22 05:43:29 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 189287507 (Comments: 1) | krotos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189379217 commented 2026-09-22 05:38:44 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 182687105 (Comments: 4) | Henri97 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hast Du schon diesen Datenbestand verarbeitet? -> https://umweltdaten.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/repositories/geo_streuobsterhebung,1u23xqvenJF-caz88xUt/workbooks/Streuobsterhebung-Fernerkundung,3UdFlTdmfIZQiyPPRrD1/worksheets/Streuobsterhebung-Fe... commented 2026-09-22 05:38:11 UTC by ticki_52 ♦142 |
| 189345733 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bitte KEINE Straßen taggen, die es als Adresse nicht gibt. Bitte keine Hausnummern in den name. commented 2026-09-22 05:27:28 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 189347677 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | leider komplett unvollständige Daten; habe sie ergänzt commented 2026-09-22 05:24:33 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 189316770 (Comments: 1) | Borgfeld-4015 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189378913 commented 2026-09-22 05:23:48 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189357213 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | leider komplett unvollständige Daten; habe sie ergänzt commented 2026-09-22 05:22:01 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 189357089 (Comments: 1) | Line225 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, could I ask about this 1000/500 kV substation near Shangzhuang Village, Yuanqu County? I noticed that you updated it to 1000 kV. Do you know the official or operational name of the substation, and do you have any source or project documentatio... commented 2026-09-22 05:17:52 UTC by GlavkomLVO ♦9 |
| 189351442 (Comments: 1) | ordinatous (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, I removed this parking yesterday, because it doesn't exist. The road is no acces for motor vehicule, only emergency and exploitation . Thx. commented 2026-09-22 04:46:21 UTC by ordinatous ♦13 |
| 189286197 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189378047 commented 2026-09-22 04:42:12 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 187852520 (Comments: 1) | Christie91277 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I hate to break it to you, but splitting ways like this (ie the single lane mapping) isn't the approved OSM way of mapping and will confuse a lot of GPSes. The rule of thumb is not to split unless there is a physical separation, like a median.<... commented 2026-09-22 04:35:15 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦111 |
| 189328195 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bitte unterlasse es die addr:housenumber in den name zu schreiben! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189302329 commented 2026-09-22 04:22:25 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189314782 (Comments: 1) | Mirditor22 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189377346 commented 2026-09-22 04:21:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189308807 (Comments: 1) | prince yadavv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189361382 commented 2026-09-22 04:20:40 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189294274 (Comments: 1) | FrenchToastFox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189353098 commented 2026-09-22 04:20:03 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189277846 (Comments: 1) | HuangFengYe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189343449 commented 2026-09-22 04:19:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189281541 (Comments: 1) | John Joseph A Gatchalian (Discussed changesets: 61) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189342691 commented 2026-09-22 04:17:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189320506 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189338882 commented 2026-09-22 04:17:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189314691 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189338725 commented 2026-09-22 04:16:28 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189278727 (Comments: 1) | kitesensation-dakhla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189329282 commented 2026-09-22 04:15:55 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189311378 (Comments: 1) | Tommy Pellettiere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189328391 commented 2026-09-22 04:15:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189277498 (Comments: 1) | dhmkb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189327961 commented 2026-09-22 04:14:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189320244 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189327658, 189327760 commented 2026-09-22 04:13:34 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189281073 (Comments: 1) | Sonak Yadav (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189327584 commented 2026-09-22 04:12:35 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189320490 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189327464 commented 2026-09-22 04:11:49 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189302329 (Comments: 3) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ich verstehe, dass für dich eine andere Form des Taggings für deinen Zweck praktischer wäre. Trotzdem ist es natürlich nicht möglich darauf Rücksicht zu nehmen. Ich bitte dich daher dich an die Pflege lt. Wiki un... commented 2026-09-22 04:05:28 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189139233 (Comments: 2) | Tsokibacsi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Burger King nyílt a helyén. commented 2026-09-22 03:43:21 UTC by Tsokibacsi ♦1 |
| 189044901 (Comments: 1) | claudiat_grab (Discussed changesets: 1) | hello claudiat, road is no longer available ya nearby the river (w1474312051) as they had recent construction for river widening projects. The current geometry is the most recent update for this area. thanks commented 2026-09-22 03:39:50 UTC by GrabMY_ainayusof ♦35 |
| 183499915 (Comments: 1) | Kab2000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was hat es sich mit diesem Knoten auf sich? Hier fehlen entsprechende Eigenschaften. Bitte überprüfen. commented 2026-09-22 03:05:51 UTC by RandomMapGuy ♦10 |
| 189339278 (Comments: 1) | Uschan90 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189376341 Duplikat entfernt commented 2026-09-22 02:57:21 UTC by Bienson ♦658 |
| 184554528 (Comments: 1) | Bub$ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Bub$,\r \r This edit appears to be incorrect according to a Lubbock resident and GSV. Please only update nodes that have been physically verified in the world. The node appears to point down Dowden Road by the aforementioned accounts.\r \... commented 2026-09-22 02:47:00 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189110835 (Comments: 4) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 16) | Siap salah, Senior. Kedepannya sebisa mungkin kasih penjelasan meski simpel. commented 2026-09-22 02:46:03 UTC by Faristoteles ♦20 |
| 188858673 (Comments: 1) | A23k26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:42:43 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188858660 (Comments: 1) | A23k26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:42:42 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188858622 (Comments: 1) | A23k26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:42:41 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188702345 (Comments: 1) | Kdaddyjwizb (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Kdaddyjwizb,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several of the nodes were either placed on top of one another or were not pointed at roads which ALPRs typically are. This influenced th... commented 2026-09-22 02:41:53 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188702354 (Comments: 1) | Kdaddyjwizb (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Kdaddyjwizb,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several of the nodes were either placed on top of one another or were not pointed at roads which ALPRs typically are. This influenced th... commented 2026-09-22 02:41:53 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188687621 (Comments: 1) | Kdaddyjwizb (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Kdaddyjwizb,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several of the nodes were either placed on top of one another or were not pointed at roads which ALPRs typically are. This influenced th... commented 2026-09-22 02:41:52 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188687718 (Comments: 1) | Kdaddyjwizb (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Kdaddyjwizb,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several of the nodes were either placed on top of one another or were not pointed at roads which ALPRs typically are. This influenced th... commented 2026-09-22 02:41:52 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188930199 (Comments: 1) | Kabelek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:40:17 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188930215 (Comments: 1) | Kabelek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:40:17 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188930170 (Comments: 1) | Kabelek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:40:16 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188930177 (Comments: 1) | Kabelek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:40:16 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188930137 (Comments: 1) | Kabelek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:40:15 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188655412 (Comments: 1) | FAFO! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:39:20 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188647799 (Comments: 1) | FAFO! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:39:19 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188652266 (Comments: 1) | FAFO! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:39:19 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188647703 (Comments: 1) | FAFO! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:39:18 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188647774 (Comments: 1) | FAFO! (Discussed changesets: 5) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:39:18 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189156966 (Comments: 1) | 1esbsltd1a (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi 1esbsltd1a,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several nodes were also placed facing away from roads which ALPRs are typically not. This influenced the decision to remove the nodes enti... commented 2026-09-22 02:37:52 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188747161 (Comments: 1) | 1esbsltd1a (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi 1esbsltd1a,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several nodes were also placed facing away from roads which ALPRs are typically not. This influenced the decision to remove the nodes enti... commented 2026-09-22 02:37:51 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188783647 (Comments: 1) | 1esbsltd1a (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi 1esbsltd1a,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several nodes were also placed facing away from roads which ALPRs are typically not. This influenced the decision to remove the nodes enti... commented 2026-09-22 02:37:51 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188746895 (Comments: 1) | 1esbsltd1a (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi 1esbsltd1a,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several nodes were also placed facing away from roads which ALPRs are typically not. This influenced the decision to remove the nodes enti... commented 2026-09-22 02:37:50 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 188746158 (Comments: 1) | 1esbsltd1a (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi 1esbsltd1a,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Several nodes were also placed facing away from roads which ALPRs are typically not. This influenced the decision to remove the nodes enti... commented 2026-09-22 02:37:49 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189175805 (Comments: 2) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:34:37 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189004206 (Comments: 1) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:34:36 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189004168 (Comments: 1) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:34:35 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189004183 (Comments: 1) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:34:35 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189004100 (Comments: 1) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:34:34 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189004015 (Comments: 1) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:34:33 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189004069 (Comments: 1) | L'Henin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Removing Flock brand/manufacturer tag from nodes as Flock is not known to be operating in this country.\r \r — alpacaMaps commented 2026-09-22 02:34:33 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189242591 (Comments: 1) | Ronjulee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Ronjulee,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Additionally, one node was not pointed at the road. This influenced the decision to delete the nodes instead of remove their tags.\r \r<... commented 2026-09-22 02:33:12 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189242558 (Comments: 1) | Ronjulee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Ronjulee,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. Additionally, one node was not pointed at the road. This influenced the decision to delete the nodes instead of remove their tags.\r \r<... commented 2026-09-22 02:33:11 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189142845 (Comments: 1) | Dookie Doctors Pet Waste Removal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, this business has been removed in changeset/189374904 as it appears to have come from an SEO company that is adding many businesses incorrectly, always using incorrect tags that then demand cleanup from volunteer mappers. We have tried ... commented 2026-09-22 02:03:11 UTC by Joel Koen ♦87 |
| 189331128 (Comments: 1) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset 189375499. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers. commented 2026-09-22 02:02:59 UTC by schobbish ♦83 |
| 189318553 (Comments: 1) | A&S SISTEMAS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá, Netosc! O que você pretendia mapear aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316279197/history? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189318553 commented 2026-09-22 01:57:50 UTC by adrianojbr ♦594 |
| 189368983 (Comments: 1) | Alícia Mota Tavares (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oi, Alicia, obrigado pela sua contribuição quando mapear edifico deve ser somente a área do telhado visível, você pode editar area clicando e arrastando os pontos e para deixar o edificios reto use a tecla "... commented 2026-09-22 01:37:17 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦98 |
| 189365053 (Comments: 1) | Emily Nunes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi Emily, muito obrigado pela contribuição, evite duplicar vias já mapeadas att. Gustavo Soares commented 2026-09-22 01:32:26 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦98 |
| 189338884 (Comments: 1) | Uschan90 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189374802 commented 2026-09-22 01:19:20 UTC by Bienson ♦658 |
| 189369430 (Comments: 1) | Bianca Góes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oi, de novo!! vi que você entrou hj q legal por favor tome cuidado com suas edições aqui um tutorial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFRG1J8lufM commented 2026-09-22 01:13:52 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦98 |
| 189369305 (Comments: 1) | Bianca Góes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oi Bianca, novamente obrigado pela sua contribuição mas edificios só devem ser mapeados a parte visivel do telhado e não sua propriedade toda att. Gustavo Soares commented 2026-09-22 01:06:37 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦98 |
| 189366980 (Comments: 1) | BrunoFelipe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi, Bruno muito obrigado pela sua contribuição mas lembre-se de conectar as estradas e não se deve colocar nomes genericos como "casa" nos edificios att Gustavo Soares commented 2026-09-22 01:03:34 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦98 |
| 187841092 (Comments: 1) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 11) | RE: way/123461877 & way/397498106 Why did you added foot=no tags to southbound Sepulveda Boulevard north of Imperial Highway? I don't recall seeing signs prohibiting pedestrians from those sections of road when I've walked/moved... commented 2026-09-22 00:17:12 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦28 |
| 189360508 (Comments: 2) | AmoebaWasTaken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Not a hard and fast rule, just wanted to explain my rationale since we're working on similar areas! :) commented 2026-09-22 00:14:26 UTC by cederbs ♦1 |
| 189259386 (Comments: 1) | реждор (Discussed changesets: 2) | Пожалуста, не пишите случайные буквы в комментариии. Такие правки, особенно которые только что-то удаляют, добавляют заставляют насторо... commented 2026-09-22 00:06:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,763 |
| 189258806 (Comments: 1) | реждор (Discussed changesets: 2) | К сожалению Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя commented 2026-09-22 00:04:06 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,763 |
| 189197038 (Comments: 1) | Mariamelqwert (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-09-22 00:02:19 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,763 |
| 189103617 (Comments: 1) | ihfhfb (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не копируйте данные их других карт commented 2026-09-22 00:00:13 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,763 |
| 189372702 (Comments: 1) | goyslop (Discussed changesets: 1) | on various aerial imagery (including the 2026 imagery from Miami Dade County) this is positioned in a likely incorrect way, it is in the middle of the kerb which seems incredibly unlikely to me. Please double check its position and fix it using aeria... commented 2026-09-21 23:53:10 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 189366471 (Comments: 1) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 13) | ** source=survey commented 2026-09-21 23:50:22 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦16 |
| 189322955 (Comments: 3) | Boon Dental - Dentist Wentworth Point (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is fixed now commented 2026-09-21 23:36:48 UTC by nevw ♦2,348 |
| 189365126 (Comments: 1) | MiLorde (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, All the areas that you have mapped in this region and tagged with leisure=horse_riding (horse riding centre) or leisure=track + sport=horse_racing (horse racetrack) are neither horse riding centres nor horse racetracks. They are probably outdo... commented 2026-09-21 23:32:17 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦913 |
| 189352644 (Comments: 2) | zsmith3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted with changeset/189372691 commented 2026-09-21 23:21:18 UTC by Mxdanger ♦116 |
| 189352656 (Comments: 2) | zsmith3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted with changeset/189372662 commented 2026-09-21 23:19:56 UTC by Mxdanger ♦116 |
| 189349213 (Comments: 3) | abbii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, I've tidied it up and sorted out the Opening Hours formatting. commented 2026-09-21 23:13:12 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦388 |
| 189330535 (Comments: 1) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 28) | According to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drinking_water, drinking_water=no means the water is obviously unsafe to drink. That’s not the case here, it’s a resurgence spring where the water has filtered through moss and... commented 2026-09-21 23:04:22 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,120 |
| 189215414 (Comments: 1) | tmgessner (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi welcome to OSM. Please dont removed features that exist on the ground, instead just update the feature type to driveway. Thanks! commented 2026-09-21 23:00:25 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 187652799 (Comments: 5) | Sparks (Discussed changesets: 42) | - [/] **MD 4 SB → Suitland Pkwy → Dower House Rd/Marlboro Pike ramp**: check for a stray connection/tag letting routers go straight through the MD4/Suitland Pkwy signal instead of right-turn-then-ramp. Confirm turn:lanes / restriction refle... commented 2026-09-21 22:51:30 UTC by Sparks ♦39 |
| 189371938 (Comments: 1) | kadiwa (Discussed changesets: 17) | Der Hinweis, den ich als Quelle benutzt hab, ist note/5030406. commented 2026-09-21 22:45:08 UTC by kadiwa ♦143 |
| 185811419 (Comments: 1) | muaum (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14018655114/ aeroway=gate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway=gate seems unusual on a breakwater. :) commented 2026-09-21 22:33:31 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,262 |
| 189371592 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Em vias locais onde não há sinalização regulamentadora é de 30 km/h em Volta Redonda e assim em todo o brasil conforme o Artigo 61 do Código de Trânsito Brasileiro (CTB) commented 2026-09-21 22:32:45 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 188599607 (Comments: 7) | w0x0f (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello. I recently went to the area, and both directions of traffic are now open, as proved by my GPX files of the region. commented 2026-09-21 22:24:10 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 189371398 (Comments: 1) | jxpsert (Discussed changesets: 87) | Source = de Panoramax foto commented 2026-09-21 22:22:26 UTC by jxpsert ♦92 |
| 189361777 (Comments: 1) | elPOMBERO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Lo que agregaste es un mirador turístico, pero en la imagen satelital parece ser una casa. Podés incluir información sobre cómo acceden los turistas al mirador? commented 2026-09-21 22:14:00 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 188979447 (Comments: 3) | bielebog (Discussed changesets: 114) | A-ha! :) noexit=yes is a technical tag that "Confirms that the endpoint of a highway is a dead end with no possibility to travel further by any transport mode along a formal path or route." It only affects quality control serv... commented 2026-09-21 22:13:05 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,262 |
| 188498086 (Comments: 1) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey there, I agree with the revert. Bollards and paint are not enough to denote a separate bikeway. The road should be tagged with cycleway=lane or cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:right=lane and the separate cycle path removed. See: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-09-21 22:10:17 UTC by clambake92115 ♦14 |
| 186040948 (Comments: 4) | Pich14 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Yo probé cada una de las posibles rutas usando la propia herramienta de OSM de todos los giros posibles de esa esquina y están todos bien. Lo comprobé con Google Maps y están iguales. Si ves algún error que y... commented 2026-09-21 21:56:28 UTC by Pich14 ♦6 |
| 189349372 (Comments: 1) | abbii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, looks good. commented 2026-09-21 21:53:49 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦388 |
| 189362777 (Comments: 2) | pkaiser0828 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @pitscheplatsch Yes, I'm new and just might use it to make some personal bike routes. So yeah, testing out the editing features. I don't know- what should I do to test, or watch? commented 2026-09-21 21:52:39 UTC by pkaiser0828 ♦1 |
| 137426708 (Comments: 3) | clementader (Discussed changesets: 16) | Merci de votre réponse, j'aurais dû y penser ! Je vois que les photos disponibles montrent un cheminement flottant le long du quai pour rejoindre son extrémité, et que les informations d'embarquement sont affich&e... commented 2026-09-21 21:48:15 UTC by StC ♦532 |
| 189370274 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 19) | Not sure why iD removed house=terraced, I feel like it shouldn't do that when changing shop type. commented 2026-09-21 21:41:15 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 189354200 (Comments: 1) | Pucciotrex30 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Quali sarebbero le "indicazioni di OSM" a cui la precedente versione dell'incrocio non era conforme? È dopo queste modifiche semmai che risultano danneggiate 6 relazioni di svolta. commented 2026-09-21 21:40:50 UTC by totera ♦362 |
| 180566042 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | Yes, actually. I had a brief discussion with Joseph R P here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180033654 commented 2026-09-21 21:35:45 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 189334457 (Comments: 3) | bpauld (Discussed changesets: 4) | Am să țin cont, nu m-am verificat cât timp editam, thanks commented 2026-09-21 21:30:33 UTC by bpauld ♦3 |
| 188889301 (Comments: 2) | 5Nap (Discussed changesets: 3) | fair point... I checked the guidelines for US roads, it should be primary_link, you're right. Don't like this approach, but I'll revert my changes for the sake of consistency commented 2026-09-21 21:24:34 UTC by 5Nap ♦1 |
| 189288674 (Comments: 2) | bpauld (Discussed changesets: 4) | Desigur, nicio problemă commented 2026-09-21 21:24:15 UTC by bpauld ♦3 |
| 189369060 (Comments: 1) | JMB08 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour. Les éléments privés ne sont pas à supprimer d'OSM : osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property mais à marquer comme étant privés : access=private Je vous invit... commented 2026-09-21 21:15:14 UTC by zarak_prod ♦10 |
| 189368954 (Comments: 1) | JMB08 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour. Les éléments privés ne sont pas à supprimer d'OSM : osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property mais à marquer comme étant privés : access=private Je vous invit... commented 2026-09-21 21:15:01 UTC by zarak_prod ♦10 |
| 189365942 (Comments: 1) | JMB08 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour. Les éléments privés ne sont pas à supprimer d'OSM : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property mais à marquer comme étant privés : https://... commented 2026-09-21 21:14:45 UTC by zarak_prod ♦10 |
| 189364494 (Comments: 1) | CaptainCrunch (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo CaptainCrunch, bitte verwende aussagekräftige Änderungskommentare bei Änderungssätzen dieses Ausmaßes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments Vielen Dank und Grüß... commented 2026-09-21 21:12:24 UTC by limes11 ♦1,106 |
| 188563498 (Comments: 1) | ÖTK (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hello, this changeset has removed the direct path between Damsböckhaus and Fischerhütte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56022365), and put the green marked trail to the gravel road instead. However, in reality, the green markin... commented 2026-09-21 21:03:33 UTC by mgpx ♦145 |
| 189105621 (Comments: 3) | AlexJdjsjs222 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189368449 Zwracaj uwagę na pozostałe tagi obiektów, które zmieniasz. Na budynku galerii nie podajesz informacji pojedynczego lokalu. Wprowadzaj źr&o... commented 2026-09-21 20:51:15 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦446 |
| 189273006 (Comments: 2) | Zwyklak (Discussed changesets: 14) | Tak commented 2026-09-21 20:50:55 UTC by Zwyklak ♦17 |
| 189364805 (Comments: 1) | Poire flambée (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-21 20:47:25 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 187100153 (Comments: 4) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Udar, Thanks a lot for confirming this and for sharing the link to the 2026 Miami-Dade imagery! That custom layer is super helpful to have right in iD. Best regards and happy mapping, Oscar commented 2026-09-21 20:38:33 UTC by oscarm_lyft ♦6 |
| 189364014 (Comments: 1) | vasony (Discussed changesets: 50) | Úgy látszik sikerült a visszavonás. Köszönöm a gyors intézkedést. :) commented 2026-09-21 20:36:46 UTC by RolandHUN_Mapper ♦22 |
| 189359255 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367966 commented 2026-09-21 20:36:22 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189357577 (Comments: 9) | Bram Daams (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ahh . Nu kan ik er chocola van maken 👍 commented 2026-09-21 20:35:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 188568559 (Comments: 1) | ÖTK (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hello, this changset has removed the path between Damsböckhaus and Klosterwappen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85829488) from the yellow hiking relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1279981). As of today, it looks as an unmark... commented 2026-09-21 20:28:19 UTC by mgpx ♦145 |
| 189362949 (Comments: 1) | PicoGen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello PicoGen, FYI I've amended this change. You tagged the fire hydrant as being in a (paved) sidewalk. *There is no sidewalk* on this side of Ypres Green, so I've changed it to fire_hydrant:position=green (i.e. in a grassy area). commented 2026-09-21 20:27:50 UTC by hoserab ♦255 |
| 189359024 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367496 commented 2026-09-21 20:22:29 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189359148 (Comments: 2) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367496 commented 2026-09-21 20:22:29 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189357761 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367496 commented 2026-09-21 20:22:28 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189356871 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367496 commented 2026-09-21 20:22:28 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189356169 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367496 commented 2026-09-21 20:22:27 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189356023 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367496 commented 2026-09-21 20:22:27 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189356407 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367496 commented 2026-09-21 20:22:27 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189356560 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367496 commented 2026-09-21 20:22:27 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189201635 (Comments: 1) | HansHansen123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Red Hawk Road continues as Red Hawk Road until it dead ends near the Blanco River. It does not change back to Lone Man Creek Drive. commented 2026-09-21 20:14:17 UTC by Lloyd Provost ♦1 |
| 189355820 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367110 commented 2026-09-21 20:12:35 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189355575 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367110 commented 2026-09-21 20:12:35 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189355393 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367110 commented 2026-09-21 20:12:35 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189355701 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367110 commented 2026-09-21 20:12:35 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189355223 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367110 commented 2026-09-21 20:12:34 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189354974 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189367110 commented 2026-09-21 20:12:34 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189364777 (Comments: 1) | ErykKk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just a Test? commented 2026-09-21 20:12:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
| 189364310 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 166) | Mogłem z tym zaczekać, aż zrobię podział tego landuse. commented 2026-09-21 20:03:52 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦446 |
| 189354745 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189366655 commented 2026-09-21 20:03:50 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189354527 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189366655 commented 2026-09-21 20:03:50 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189354342 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189366655 commented 2026-09-21 20:03:50 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189353787 (Comments: 2) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189366655 commented 2026-09-21 20:03:49 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189353918 (Comments: 1) | sebastian3534 (Discussed changesets: 20) | irrelevant tags and personal details https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189366655 commented 2026-09-21 20:03:49 UTC by yrtimiD ♦1,040 |
| 189328276 (Comments: 4) | fs_LT (Discussed changesets: 38) | Vielen Dank, hätts nicht besser mache können. Heut einen kleinen Umweg eingelegt. Das eignet sich dort perfekt für Adressen auf Eingang, die Hauseingänge sind ja fast schon als Portale ausgeführt! Vorteil von Adresse a... commented 2026-09-21 19:42:31 UTC by Hungerburg ♦426 |
| 188009159 (Comments: 2) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Danke für den Hinweis. Dies ist wohl bezugnehmend auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5492268. Auf Mapillary ist die Beschilderung leider nicht erkenntlich, um die Tags entsprechend anzupassen. commented 2026-09-21 19:41:31 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦116 |
| 187959207 (Comments: 2) | Vétérini (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, Thank you for pointing this out. I'm still unsure how I got those keys wrong on multiple relations, since I copy-pasted those attributes from PTNA, that correctly adds the FR-CVL-FB suffix. Anyway, every relation should be fixed as of htt... commented 2026-09-21 19:37:10 UTC by Vétérini ♦27 |
| 186599911 (Comments: 2) | Galbinus (Discussed changesets: 132) | 1. Ich kenne praktisch keine Forstwege, zumindest nicht in Nordhessen oder Ost-NRW, auf die tatsächlich surface=gravel zutrifft, so wie es im Wiki definiert ist. 2. Kenne ich ein paar Wege in der Region und habe im Änderungssatzkommenta... commented 2026-09-21 19:27:07 UTC by Galbinus ♦172 |
| 188319736 (Comments: 1) | Citizen208 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Heads up on this one. There's a principle in OSM called "Names are not functions". You don't want to put a name on a road that doesn't have one, like a parking isle. The other tags make that clear. I've gone ahead and re... commented 2026-09-21 19:18:42 UTC by ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦34 |
| 189225187 (Comments: 1) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 99) | :+1: commented 2026-09-21 19:15:16 UTC by emvee ♦429 |
| 188317527 (Comments: 1) | Citizen208 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks good! Welcome to the mapping community! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188317527 commented 2026-09-21 19:15:15 UTC by ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦34 |
| 189364653 (Comments: 1) | VeeBack02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was a bit too trigger happy here. The violation was that it was untranslated. commented 2026-09-21 19:08:58 UTC by VeeBack02 ♦1 |
| 189264432 (Comments: 4) | AmoebaWasTaken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay, I just uploaded a revert. Thanks! commented 2026-09-21 19:01:11 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 181090808 (Comments: 1) | JanVCK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you cannot see building names in Ortofotomozaika SR, so you need to quote your sources. commented 2026-09-21 18:56:49 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,041 |
| 189310873 (Comments: 4) | vasony (Discussed changesets: 50) | Elvileg ment a revert a poligonra ami véletlenül bekerült a fránya Q betűre commented 2026-09-21 18:54:49 UTC by vasony ♦609 |
| 189315980 (Comments: 6) | Daniel Claassen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Even though you requested a review on your changeset, things you edit still go live immediately, so there's nothing for me to decline or restart. The request for review is why I looked at the changeset. You can make corrections yourself: go in t... commented 2026-09-21 18:53:20 UTC by Allison P ♦1,150 |
| 56426618 (Comments: 1) | LafarM (Discussed changesets: 51) | Pamiętasz może czy tu jest znak B-5 czy B-18? `maxgcweight` oznaczał raczej B-5 (maks. masa rzeczywista), a znak B18 to (maks. dopuszczalna masa całkowita pojazdu). Albo pamiętasz może czemu tak to się kiedyś oznaczało? http... commented 2026-09-21 18:47:17 UTC by kubahahaha ♦531 |
| 189330208 (Comments: 2) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 47) | Le grand chef il a dit ça changeait des choses des fois : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/jardinons-les-donnees-datp-avec-atp2osm/43887/168?u=k12230lf commented 2026-09-21 18:42:56 UTC by K12230LF ♦83 |
| 188795735 (Comments: 1) | Ornits (Discussed changesets: 7) | שים לב ששברת פה יחסים של כמעט כל קווי האוטובוס באשדוד, ובעריכה אחרת שברת את כל היחסים שעוברים ליד תחנה מרכזית ירושלים. תשתדל לשים לב לשינ... commented 2026-09-21 18:42:06 UTC by ירח אפל ♦8 |
| 189181183 (Comments: 5) | Wallardi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Prima! commented 2026-09-21 18:40:31 UTC by Wallardi ♦2 |
| 189352590 (Comments: 1) | SoyElSka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Todo ok con las suyas. Solo dos temas: 1) si algo merece arreglo, no hay problemas, pero se arregla, no se borra para agregar otra cosa casi igual 2) por favor un polígono por estructura. Y sobre la estru... commented 2026-09-21 18:34:41 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189243889 (Comments: 1) | kromboomssloot (Discussed changesets: 4) | In deze wijziging wordt de verhuizing verkeerd doorgevoerd. Het adres wordt aangepast naar Herenstraat, maar blijft in de Wolvenstraat staan. Ik heb het teruggedraaid. commented 2026-09-21 18:32:56 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,212 |
| 189363305 (Comments: 1) | Căprar Andrei (Discussed changesets: 9) | sources= survey, local knowledge commented 2026-09-21 18:32:55 UTC by Căprar Andrei ♦9 |
| 189181129 (Comments: 3) | Wallardi (Discussed changesets: 2) | mooi zo! commented 2026-09-21 18:28:54 UTC by Wallardi ♦2 |
| 181880903 (Comments: 3) | frydzio (Discussed changesets: 12) | Nie zmieniałem tagów drogi głównej, więc jest tam trunk ze względu na ustalenia forum, że główne drogi krajowe są trunk. Węzeł powstaje w ramach przebudowy do drogi ekspresowej i zgodnie z ustaleniami po wybudowaniu powi... commented 2026-09-21 18:22:24 UTC by frydzio ♦77 |
| 189362890 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Nessa rua onde foi alterado a velocidade, há placas de 30 km/h. commented 2026-09-21 18:22:15 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189361028 (Comments: 2) | Ester Arimon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bona tarda Marc, Moltes gràcies per la informació i l'explicació. He pensat que era la millor opció per evitar confusions, ja que a la pràctica són accessos i trams estrictament privats i no pas u... commented 2026-09-21 18:19:41 UTC by Ester Arimon ♦1 |
| 117174409 (Comments: 1) | km2bp (Discussed changesets: 235) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4588394 ? commented 2026-09-21 18:12:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189352823 (Comments: 1) | ShoalhavenRiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thats a private service road, not a residential road. I´ll fix it. regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189352823 commented 2026-09-21 18:10:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189359142 (Comments: 1) | firefighter—>112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Folgende Hinweise: - Hydranten sollten nicht mit anderen Linien und Flächen verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben... commented 2026-09-21 18:08:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 188678856 (Comments: 3) | Allroads (Discussed changesets: 47) | Aangepast in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189361920#map=18/52.331176/5.639961 commented 2026-09-21 18:08:19 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189299276 (Comments: 4) | elisha_maps (Discussed changesets: 3) | >>Natürlich müsste du ja auch (vielleicht) gesehen haben, dass erst seit gestern Abend mit OSM begonnen habe. << Das habe ich, ich hoffe mein Kommentar ist nicht zu unfreundlich formuliert gewesen, das passiert mir hier leide... commented 2026-09-21 18:06:39 UTC by Tatfahren ♦384 |
| 189217188 (Comments: 1) | Rainstone Water Heaters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed in changeset 189361046 due to promotional description and invalid tags. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers. commented 2026-09-21 18:05:15 UTC by schobbish ♦83 |
| 67446756 (Comments: 2) | Kaarti_B (Discussed changesets: 4) | Never mind, figured it out. It was some shop which has been replaced in the meantime. commented 2026-09-21 18:02:41 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,039 |
| 189013609 (Comments: 2) | Damiano987 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Jeśli do dnia jutrzejszego nie odpowiesz Damiano na nasze zarzuty, wycofam ten zestaw zmian. Skasowałeś skrót skweru w ramach "aktualizacji". Oznaczyłeś zakończenie prac na planu Powstańców jako przywró... commented 2026-09-21 18:02:23 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦446 |
| 189328710 (Comments: 1) | s1224p (Discussed changesets: 1) | Este changeset y todos los anteriores se han revertido por ser una cuenta continuación de esta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MMBosch/blocks. commented 2026-09-21 17:49:10 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,882 |
| 189338921 (Comments: 1) | Tornado112 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. An dem Hydranten ist alles richtig; der Hinweis auf die Entfernung in „note“ ist eher unüblich. Vielen Dank für... commented 2026-09-21 17:40:24 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 188548509 (Comments: 1) | Jean Br (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, les bonnes pratiques recommandent de cartographier qu'un item par objet OSM. Ici, je pense que la clôture (barrier=fence) et la forêt (natural=wood) devraient être sur des objets OSM différents. https://wi... commented 2026-09-21 17:39:41 UTC by LaTêteDansLeGuidon ♦9 |
| 188896212 (Comments: 2) | SkySide (Discussed changesets: 2) | The path through the Hilton is for guests, I did add the correct path through the building around the perimeter commented 2026-09-21 17:33:20 UTC by SkySide ♦1 |
| 189360333 (Comments: 1) | alexmapex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Змяненні тыпаў вуліц у Ваўкавыску commented 2026-09-21 17:26:35 UTC by alexmapex ♦1 |
| 188831734 (Comments: 5) | CyberknightMK (Discussed changesets: 7) | Adriano, tem algum jeito de automatizar essa associação com a via? Pois pelo jeito eles estão em cima das linhas, só não pertencem a elas. commented 2026-09-21 17:16:38 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦29 |
| 189345739 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Edit looks good - can confirm this through research. commented 2026-09-21 17:15:18 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 187435184 (Comments: 2) | Rumburak57 (Discussed changesets: 8) | siehe https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18.0/52.2611/8.4581 commented 2026-09-21 17:14:31 UTC by DeFra85 ♦301 |
| 189344915 (Comments: 1) | guy4159 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Edit looks good to me. I've drawn a building around the shop and added the node you created to it as per how the other shops along here have been mapped. commented 2026-09-21 17:13:30 UTC by Car Tographer ♦24 |
| 175333071 (Comments: 1) | sarnek (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5504692 wg tej uwagi nie ma tu ścieżki. Zdjęcia lotnicze w sumie też potwierdzają. commented 2026-09-21 17:04:15 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,803 |
 | 67673600 (Comments: 2) | Ro Sun (Discussed changesets: 16) | was asking about say https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673556994 commented 2026-09-21 17:01:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 182204942 (Comments: 5) | tintinmaster (Discussed changesets: 10) | Außerdem wird sowohl im Englischen als auch Deutschen Wiki für sidewalk https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk der Tag sidewalk:surface nicht erwähnt commented 2026-09-21 16:59:34 UTC by tintinmaster ♦9 |
| 164135145 (Comments: 1) | STM-Stivi (Discussed changesets: 12) | An der Abzweigung von der L 1066 nach Norden in die Kohlenstraße steht KEIN Fahrverbotsschild für öffentlichen Verkehr. Wenn das so gedacht ist (d.h. das Schild nicht nur vergessen wurde), wäre bei motor_vehicle "yes" s... commented 2026-09-21 16:55:17 UTC by pms63 ♦5 |
| 181055708 (Comments: 1) | Cricri93160 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bonjour, je vois que tu as supprimé cette barrière, mais elle est toujours visible sur le terrain. Je me permets donc d'annuler ta modification. commented 2026-09-21 16:52:38 UTC by LaTêteDansLeGuidon ♦9 |
| 50152325 (Comments: 2) | marek kleciak (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hej! Czy roof:material=rcc coś oznacza? commented 2026-09-21 16:50:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189358778 (Comments: 1) | chath_tsu (Discussed changesets: 17) | right turns from I-5 offramp to 64th are allowed; the arrows on the pavement are one-way reminder arrows and not turn restrictions commented 2026-09-21 16:50:41 UTC by chath_tsu ♦34 |
| 189215415 (Comments: 3) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 34) | It doesn't matter, Latin-script languages normally use endonyms of other Latin-script languages as are, without simplification. "Klaipeda" is an exception: as said, is different as this name form (without ė) is actually common in Germ... commented 2026-09-21 16:35:37 UTC by Pikse ♦250 |
| 189334290 (Comments: 1) | Jokr97 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thank you for your contribution. You requested a review. I noticed you tried adjusting the location, however it looks like you did not actually change it, you only adjusted the address (addr:) tags on the office. The coordinate o... commented 2026-09-21 16:33:25 UTC by KartKollektor ♦38 |
| 189357787 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Essa rua tem placas indicando 30 km/h. commented 2026-09-21 16:31:42 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 188655426 (Comments: 5) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 34) | name:et should be corrected, too. I'll do it later if someone else doesn't get to it before. Whether we like it or not, that's the same of this town. "Kingissepp" by the way is a genuine Estonian-language name, Russians have ... commented 2026-09-21 16:27:34 UTC by Pikse ♦250 |
| 188912432 (Comments: 3) | bkrc (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merhaba @bkrc cevabınız için teşekkür ederim. OpenStreetMap'te diğer haritalardan veya diğer haritaların uydu görüntü servislerini kullanmak yasak. Lütfen diğer haritaları OpenStreetMap için ... commented 2026-09-21 16:26:03 UTC by keyyushi ♦36 |
| 50187481 (Comments: 1) | tomi002 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tu chyba mogło by być po prostu hgv=no commented 2026-09-21 16:21:32 UTC by kubahahaha ♦531 |
| 183529505 (Comments: 11) | Puclik1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | more photos: https://www.bergfex.at/sommer/kaernten/touren/hochtour/4590767,grossglockner-ueber-meletzkigrat/ commented 2026-09-21 16:20:34 UTC by -=|MisterY|=- ♦25 |
| 183355515 (Comments: 2) | Xcm81 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you. I have learned something new! commented 2026-09-21 16:17:56 UTC by Xcm81 ♦3 |
| 189342350 (Comments: 1) | Chris_Gage91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bore da What streetlevel imagery did you use for this edit and I am wondering what inspired you to make this edit as the road has not had a 40 mph limit for a number of years? Diolch Phil commented 2026-09-21 16:12:20 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189044168 (Comments: 2) | S_Bolle-Timm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo rempshaener, vielen Dank für die Tipps! Nutze das Tool zum ersten Mal und hatte schon bemerkt, dass die Markierungen teilweise angeflanscht waren. Werde ich in Kürze korrigieren :-) Beste Grüße commented 2026-09-21 16:11:33 UTC by S_Bolle-Timm ♦1 |
| 189339741 (Comments: 1) | dktue (Discussed changesets: 44) | Moin :) wie du diesen Punkt hier verschoben hast, gefällt mir nicht so recht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9197021373 cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2026-09-21 16:04:31 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189356037 (Comments: 1) | Kurondie (Discussed changesets: 6) | La fiche du ministère de la Culture s'étend sur tout le quartier, j'ai donc mis `ref:mhs` sur la zone résidentielle (landuse=residential). Mais j'ai aussi ajouté les données liées comme l'... commented 2026-09-21 16:02:58 UTC by Kurondie ♦3 |
| 189239863 (Comments: 8) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 376) | :-) commented 2026-09-21 16:00:07 UTC by Molboen ♦1 |
| 112744843 (Comments: 1) | Khamis Juma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Khamis, What is the source of all the trees? And how do you think these trees contribute to the map data? Consensus among mappers in OpenStreetMap is that ordinary trees in a forest/wood are not mapped individually. For a tree mapping gu... commented 2026-09-21 15:48:46 UTC by PTT ♦5 |
| 187882989 (Comments: 1) | Yasenia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why do you added this? Isn't it duplicate? Зачем вы это добавили? Разве это не дубликат? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11794116985 commented 2026-09-21 15:42:27 UTC by kubahahaha ♦531 |
| 187853308 (Comments: 1) | Yasenia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Whats source of that? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5511641 commented 2026-09-21 15:39:48 UTC by kubahahaha ♦531 |
| 189354205 (Comments: 2) | Alex5288989 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Wanneer er geen uitzondering is ..is het uiteraard correct. oneway=no hoeft niet op wegen.. soms wel handig als je bang bent dat een medemapper weer =yes gaat taggen. commented 2026-09-21 15:34:27 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 188909411 (Comments: 3) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 130) | i rode it yesterday. both paths exist. https://www.strava.com/activities/20257652686 commented 2026-09-21 15:22:57 UTC by kingnormie ♦1 |
| 189351069 (Comments: 1) | Igor Romão Ferreira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De format van de openingstijden heb ik aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-21 15:22:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189350165 (Comments: 1) | Stadt Diemelstadt (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hier der nächte Tip: Objekte wie Gebäude, die oft rechtwinklig sind, können hier bei OSM auch mit einem kleinen Trick rechtwinklig gemacht werden: Nachdem die Eigenschaften des Objekts ausgewählt wurden noch die Taste "... commented 2026-09-21 15:17:18 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189059748 (Comments: 2) | Martin Constantino–Bodin (Discussed changesets: 35) | Bonjour. Il ne me semble pas avoir supprimé de PoI ici : le bureau de poste était représenté en surfacique sur le multipolygone qui représentait la partie de bâtiment à 7 étages. Je l'a... commented 2026-09-21 15:16:28 UTC by Martin Constantino–Bodin ♦137 |
| 135985165 (Comments: 6) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | Agreed. When I started this project (2017ish), such rules weren't in place, and I admittedly haven't kept up as well as I should have on changes to such rules. I'll work on getting those fixed! commented 2026-09-21 15:11:52 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 189350546 (Comments: 1) | Stadt Diemelstadt (Discussed changesets: 7) | Grüße aus Korbach :) kleiner Hinweis: Die Adressen, die ihr hier von den Punkten (nodes) auf die neuen Gebäudeflächen geschoben habt hatte auch den Eintrag addr:suburb=Wrexen was aktuell verloren gegangen ist. Klappt euch ... commented 2026-09-21 15:11:21 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 189353073 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 24) | source is AFDC commented 2026-09-21 14:53:35 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 185997514 (Comments: 2) | morissa14 (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5408574 commented 2026-09-21 14:46:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188942121 (Comments: 2) | goodidea (Discussed changesets: 33) | Nee. Das muss ein Versehen gewesen sein. Bitte ändern ... commented 2026-09-21 14:27:26 UTC by goodidea ♦158 |
| 189339997 (Comments: 2) | pawka007 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hej, sytuacja jest dwuznaczna. Droga jest przejezdna dla rowerów i nie ma już zakazu wjazdu rowerom, jednocześnie nie jest oddana do użytku. Nie bardzo można zmienić na gotową a nie można jej użyć w routingu rowerowym w planetach. Wst... commented 2026-09-21 14:22:05 UTC by pawka007 ♦9 |
| 189350131 (Comments: 1) | 2026sameep (Discussed changesets: 3) | ¡Hola! Disculpá que insista pero tampoco va "SAMEEP" en nombre, eso iría si dijeran, por ejemplo, que lo llaman Juan Gómez en honor al primer presidente de SAMEEP. El nombre SAMEEP en este caso va en el nodo que y... commented 2026-09-21 14:14:04 UTC by pertile ♦81 |
| 189344465 (Comments: 5) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 125) | I agree Lower Bloomsgrove Road makes more sense considering how it's spelt elsewhere. I've attached alt_name with "Lower Blooms Grove Road" with an explanative note. commented 2026-09-21 14:09:15 UTC by Aethonatic ♦91 |
| 189350708 (Comments: 1) | rle32795 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Address from MML background commented 2026-09-21 14:04:03 UTC by rle32795 ♦46 |
| 189330201 (Comments: 3) | fs_LT (Discussed changesets: 38) | Danke dir, deshalb meine neutrale Nachfrage ;-) Danke für deine gute Arbeit und weiter so :-) commented 2026-09-21 14:03:36 UTC by M_Gaugg ♦50 |
| 189336352 (Comments: 1) | citywideplumbing (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted this changeset that has interfered with the suburb boundary and placed a business at a location remote from the tagged address. The location used was the label position for the suburb boundary. Many of tags used are unsuitable in osm ... commented 2026-09-21 14:03:06 UTC by nevw ♦2,348 |
| 124778111 (Comments: 3) | Pitoresker Pi (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hallo, da ist mir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen, diesen unsinnigen Tag wollte ich eigentlich nicht setzen. Ich habe jetzt gerade einen validen direction-Wert eingetragen. commented 2026-09-21 14:00:28 UTC by Pitoresker Pi ♦44 |
| 189021009 (Comments: 1) | Alexandra Puscasu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, at least this feature (drinking water) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13045404598 was still there when I came past there around 3 weeks ago. Could you please explain what made you delet it? Thank you! commented 2026-09-21 13:59:24 UTC by Rabo2024 ♦2 |
| 189349050 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 24) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-09-21 13:37:33 UTC by sahshoor ♦31 |
| 189302141 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 24) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-09-21 13:37:31 UTC by sahshoor ♦31 |
| 188958137 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 24) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-09-21 13:37:29 UTC by sahshoor ♦31 |
| 189348316 (Comments: 1) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Top! commented 2026-09-21 13:27:41 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189347815 (Comments: 1) | gemeente Harderwijk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Gemeente.. Ik heb G12a accesstags toegevoegd. G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 https://wiki.openstree... commented 2026-09-21 13:26:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 159366790 (Comments: 2) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 117) | Note resolved and closed. The Heritage 1 classification was not applicable. commented 2026-09-21 13:26:03 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦115 |
| 189320126 (Comments: 1) | Skywave (Discussed changesets: 33) | De 20 beschadigde routerelaties van de buslijnen zijn weer gerepareerd. Ook de bushalte op de verkeerde weghelft is weer op de juiste plaats gezet. Ook de rotonde moet anders opgeknipt worden om de routes op de juiste manier over de rotonde... commented 2026-09-21 13:16:24 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,588 |
| 189322567 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Pemakaman seperti ini tidak seharusnya menggunakan building=*. Mohon respons pesan saya di menu profil Anda. commented 2026-09-21 13:15:47 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189344129 (Comments: 8) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | De Pasweg en het Molenbroeksvoetpad zouden dan ook G13 zijn. Dat routeert overigens wel als path ook. Dat heeft een Duitse mapper aangepast van cycleway naar path. Dat klopt wel in Duitsland, maar niet in Nederland. In Duitsland mag je ni... commented 2026-09-21 13:10:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189335301 (Comments: 1) | outcast141 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correct commented 2026-09-21 13:03:01 UTC by Mohhamad Saadat ♦1 |
| 189346960 (Comments: 3) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | foot=yes is default, maar kwaad kan het niet. commented 2026-09-21 13:02:41 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189345273 (Comments: 5) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hier ter Leering ende Vermaeck.. De tagging van fietspaden. G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 https://wiki... commented 2026-09-21 12:51:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189213507 (Comments: 2) | aesobczack (Discussed changesets: 4) | Correto! Estarei alterando. commented 2026-09-21 12:51:05 UTC by aesobczack ♦3 |
| 189345851 (Comments: 3) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 418) | typo bicycle=use_sidepath bedoel ik. commented 2026-09-21 12:47:56 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189345157 (Comments: 1) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Zo'n informal=yes pad zal eigenlijk altijd een highway=path zijn. Dat heeft vast geen G7 bord. Alle begin is moeilijk. commented 2026-09-21 12:44:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189345432 (Comments: 1) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Plaatsnaam ontbrak.. Toegevoegd commented 2026-09-21 12:37:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 188768848 (Comments: 4) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hi Joel Koen, Thank you for sharing the plan document. It is possible that the residential may become a shared path after construction is completed. I will review the changes and the available information more closely. In the meantime, ... commented 2026-09-21 12:33:32 UTC by Tinetto ♦25 |
| 136304327 (Comments: 1) | Lesnydzban (Discussed changesets: 21) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4350292 ? commented 2026-09-21 12:30:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189344564 (Comments: 1) | Guidob76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ik heb naam Voormalige Kantine Leegstaand aangepast naar description. Gebruik name= niet voor beschrijvinegn. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-21 12:24:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189318388 (Comments: 1) | mikedotd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to oSM! Please be careful! You move the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7915560416 more over 100 meters over other buildings. I correct this to the old position commented 2026-09-21 12:19:48 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,858 |
| 179109810 (Comments: 1) | Dimitrios K (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ποιά είναι η απόφαση της Διαύγειας; commented 2026-09-21 12:16:32 UTC by PeachyOne ♦38 |
| 189287866 (Comments: 1) | AbhishekMathew (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi AbhishekMathew, thanks for your contributions. A couple of things to note: Health Centres and CHPS are best tagged as amenity=health_post, but not amenity=clinic or amenity=hospital because their level of service and facilities do not matc... commented 2026-09-21 12:16:17 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦187 |
| 189285830 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189345031 commented 2026-09-21 12:16:14 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 188827172 (Comments: 1) | Pascal777999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, et bienvenue sur OSM ! Les points "police" sur la carte sont destinés à représenter des commissariats, ils ne sont pas faits pour représenter des points de contrôle ponctuels tenus par la police... commented 2026-09-21 12:15:17 UTC by rezemika ♦28 |
| 189311344 (Comments: 1) | karr4s (Discussed changesets: 24) | 🤩 commented 2026-09-21 11:59:39 UTC by divaddivag ♦154 |
| 172095300 (Comments: 1) | kEYFSDFFS (Discussed changesets: 1) | 平房区不能简单的纯复制粘贴来绘制，它们和实地的建筑并不贴合，我们宁可它不存在，而不是它是完全错误的数据，尤其是其中一部分 比如 way/1430803160 这样的有极其离谱的高度数据，这... commented 2026-09-21 11:58:20 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦601 |
| 189171182 (Comments: 3) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 14) | Cool, I think it is fixed now (looking the Geofabrik OSM Inspector validator) commented 2026-09-21 11:55:01 UTC by ramthelinefeed ♦94 |
| 189320371 (Comments: 1) | Naomy Alarcón (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189343770 commented 2026-09-21 11:50:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189195443 (Comments: 4) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 122) | ok dzięki, poprawiłem na path commented 2026-09-21 11:45:17 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦101 |
| 189335068 (Comments: 2) | Drungus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you! commented 2026-09-21 11:44:52 UTC by Drungus ♦3 |
| 189324808 (Comments: 1) | dsabey3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be carefull you move the nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/521988427, https://www.osm.org/node/213541432 more than 100 meters over buildings and other streets. I move the node back to the original position. commented 2026-09-21 11:39:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,858 |
| 189211624 (Comments: 2) | aesobczack (Discussed changesets: 4) | tens razão, eu havia apenas arrumado os limites e bordas, não havia verificado as tags existentes. Com certeza se encaixa como shop=convenience. Já estarei arrumando. commented 2026-09-21 11:38:01 UTC by aesobczack ♦3 |
| 189342951 (Comments: 2) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 27) | That was for the note .. commented 2026-09-21 11:35:33 UTC by 9_tab ♦152 |
| 189331234 (Comments: 2) | Sforzando9500 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Sorry, I was baffled by multiple sites saying different things. Am pretty sure the touring side has unfortunately gone. Cheers Phil commented 2026-09-21 11:32:17 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 187591637 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 10) | Több szerkesztésében is látom, hogy a foot=designated helyett foot=yes kerül be. Mi ennek az oka? A wiki alapján a "gyalog- és kerékpárút" KRESZ táblával jel&ou... commented 2026-09-21 11:19:17 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189143017 (Comments: 2) | JakobD029 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Guten Tag, ich habe die Haltestellen nun mit einem proposed tag versehen. Ich war selber schon vor Ort gewesen. Es handelt sich hierbei um eine Bauvorleistung. Mir ist bewusst, dass die Busse heute noch auf dem Platz halten. Dementsprec... commented 2026-09-21 11:17:29 UTC by JakobD029 ♦6 |
| 188089291 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nekem ezek nagyon úgy tűnnek, hogy kizárólag kerékpárutak. Miért került rá a foot=designated ? commented 2026-09-21 11:14:57 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 188025380 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ha a valóságban nem út, akkor miért szerepel a térképen még? Illetve milyen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack az, ami gyalog nem közlekedhető? Magánterület? commented 2026-09-21 11:13:30 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189311918 (Comments: 1) | capitalriftplayer1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This map data is actually used by people. Please don't add junk. commented 2026-09-21 11:10:17 UTC by InsertUser ♦500 |
| 185783427 (Comments: 1) | ApartmentsCracowTravel (Discussed changesets: 1) | "Rodzinny apartament dla sześciu osób z parkingiem prywatnym" to nie jest prawdziwa nazwa, usuń też spam reklamowy z opisu dodawanie firm przez ich przedstawicieli jest OK ale bez syfu spamersko-reklamowego commented 2026-09-21 11:08:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188422167 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 10) | Üdv. A járdáknak nincs utcaneve, a járda az utcához tartozik, amin már szerepelt a név. Ezt több szerkesztésében is látni. Törlöm mindet. commented 2026-09-21 11:03:54 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 186688921 (Comments: 1) | Marcus Hansson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej! Varför ändrar du dessa till footway? Footway innebär att att det ska vara skyltat specifikt som gångväg. Som du har lagt in det nu så blir cykeltrafik förbjuden commented 2026-09-21 11:03:16 UTC by maasa123 ♦19 |
| 189280192 (Comments: 1) | Hoàng Thị Tuw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189341560 commented 2026-09-21 11:01:51 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 188418281 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 10) | Üdv. Szerintem egyetlen körforgalomban és főúton sem lehet gyalogosan közlekedni, így ezek hibás szerkesztések. Ha járdát szeretett volna jelölni, az megadható a https://wik... commented 2026-09-21 11:00:23 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 19917666 (Comments: 2) | Maxime DIVO (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/carte?c=9.38583,42.82806&z=5.0E-5&l0=GEOGRAPHICALGRIDSYSTEMS.MAPS::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(1)&permalink=yes commented 2026-09-21 10:58:35 UTC by kuhni74 ♦484 |
| 189157189 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 10) | Üdv. Kérem, tájékozódjon a wikiben leírtak alapján: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/K%C3%B6z%C3%BAti_jelz%C5%91t%C3%A1bl%C3%A1k A https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125180824 eset&eacu... commented 2026-09-21 10:58:07 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 188932155 (Comments: 2) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 170) | Was interessiert mich ein nicht öffentlich zugänglicher Wasserspender in irgendeinem Büro?! commented 2026-09-21 10:57:57 UTC by DeFra85 ♦301 |
| 189163359 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 10) | Üdv. Felesleges a foot=yes a footway-ekre, hiszen az implikálja, hogy gyalogos út. commented 2026-09-21 10:54:49 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189340459 (Comments: 1) | ludozz (Discussed changesets: 6) | review_requested \tyes Hoi, Zo te zien is het allemaal goed gegaan. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-21 10:49:41 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189169789 (Comments: 3) | Shre_WD (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi marcmarti, like my colleague, I also interpreted this as a throughabout. Changeset reverted to its previous state. We are re-checking our recent edits in Spain and we will correct any similar issue. Thank you very much for reaching out to let us k... commented 2026-09-21 10:47:10 UTC by Shre_WD ♦10 |
| 189334118 (Comments: 3) | scavidus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Info merged with addressnode. The company-name is not the building-name. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-09-21 10:38:09 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 187211878 (Comments: 2) | MichaelCollinson (Discussed changesets: 96) | Yep, thanks, typo. Fixed commented 2026-09-21 10:36:29 UTC by MichaelCollinson ♦59 |
| 189337784 (Comments: 1) | LightningPlaces (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Lightning.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. gr eggie commented 2026-09-21 10:31:47 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| X | 188415842 (Comments: 6) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi JassKurn, thank you for reverting the changeset based on your local knowledge, and thank you for reaching out to inquire the data sources used in the edit. You can see the screenshot of the GPS Traces and GPS Speeds datasets I referred at the t... commented 2026-09-21 10:30:37 UTC by Gorger ♦59 |
| 189332297 (Comments: 11) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Sounds good. I think I'll continue to look through these for any serious deviations and double check my work (manually). But further to that I'll be driving through most of these in week or two, so I like the GPS metadata for confirm... commented 2026-09-21 10:29:21 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 189337465 (Comments: 3) | Mairair (Discussed changesets: 1) | proposed=residential ook verwijderd commented 2026-09-21 10:20:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 188907053 (Comments: 2) | grozsa11 (Discussed changesets: 49) | Jaj, köszi a figyelmet... áttettem alt_name-be. commented 2026-09-21 10:14:07 UTC by grozsa11 ♦40 |
| 189309317 (Comments: 1) | Blazearator (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189339365 commented 2026-09-21 10:13:41 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189279818 (Comments: 3) | fercs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gracias por las correcciones. surface=unpaved es muy genérico, cuando no se sabe de qué son. Calles de tierra sin compactar son surface=dirt, compactadas surface=compacted. commented 2026-09-21 10:13:15 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦138 |
| 189297957 (Comments: 1) | User0108 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Apa hal!? commented 2026-09-21 10:05:25 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189322571 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Essa rua tem placas indicando velocidade de 30 km/h. commented 2026-09-21 10:00:27 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189178910 (Comments: 1) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, there is no need for new electric bicycle tags for the US: electric_bicycle:class_1 is equivalent to electric_bicycle. electric_bicycle:class_2 is equivalent to electric_moped (proposed only) electric_bicycle:class_3 is eq... commented 2026-09-21 10:00:15 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 176195557 (Comments: 2) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hello, do you have an example to hand? I generally split buildings where there are separate footprints and addresses (for example a semidetached house), but add to building parts for parts of a complex building (such as a hospital, with wings ... commented 2026-09-21 09:53:49 UTC by philipcullen ♦42 |
| 188960717 (Comments: 2) | B@ART (Discussed changesets: 12) | Cześć, słuszna uwaga, rozpędziłem się z takiem ref. Usunięte w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189338394 commented 2026-09-21 09:52:37 UTC by B@ART ♦2 |
| 187778125 (Comments: 2) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi StC, I reviewed the hiking and bus route relations at the location but did not find any broken continuity on any of the relations on the roundabout. In case I missed anything, or did not look exactly where you are looking, can you please let me... commented 2026-09-21 09:52:03 UTC by BR_pebble ♦111 |
| 189171096 (Comments: 2) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi marcmarti, thank you for reaching out to communicate this. I considered this as a throughabout in my edit, but I will be more aware to spot the differences in my future edits. Changeset reverted to its previous state. All the best. commented 2026-09-21 09:50:38 UTC by BR_pebble ♦111 |
| 187038489 (Comments: 1) | danctc (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hello danctc, you added a lot of landuse=farmyard areas, but that tag is only used for small areas with buildings on it and not for the whole area that belongs to a farm (see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard). |
| 189314139 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189337754 commented 2026-09-21 09:40:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 187469768 (Comments: 1) | Christie91277 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174489610/history - you meant house=terraced, not house=terrace, right? commented 2026-09-21 09:36:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189330313 (Comments: 1) | Huldega (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ich habe die OTG nicht mehr sichtbaren gelöscht bzw. in die aktuellen geändert; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189337502 commented 2026-09-21 09:34:26 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189288529 (Comments: 1) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 33) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189337208 commented 2026-09-21 09:27:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189328940 (Comments: 2) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 28) | There's so many `shop=general` in this area, that a simple `shop=general` node with no additional info would be practically useless imo. commented 2026-09-21 09:23:31 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 188713197 (Comments: 2) | lorenzen-vbn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe im Forum geantwortet. commented 2026-09-21 09:22:58 UTC by lorenzen-vbn ♦1 |
| 189330822 (Comments: 1) | marvman (Discussed changesets: 0) | geändert amenity=pharmacy zu shop=computer; alte Einträge von der Apotheke gelöscht commented 2026-09-21 09:21:37 UTC by Znaika ♦224 |
| 189321737 (Comments: 1) | Silent (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have changed (in Netherland) the wikipedia syntax. The wikipedia tag should not contain an URL but a language code and the human readable article title (no underscores but spaces and no html coding) separated by `:` . Example: not "https://... commented 2026-09-21 09:20:12 UTC by Kees 59 ♦131 |
| 189237681 (Comments: 2) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hi, my fault, I forgot. Will do better next days :) I did some investigation during summer. Recent GTFS data are actually available, I am thinking how to translate them into OSM relations... commented 2026-09-21 09:09:03 UTC by adamos ♦77 |
| 189263553 (Comments: 4) | janhals (Discussed changesets: 32) | Een hele gedachtengang. Je zegt o.a. "De weg is er omdat er parkeerplaatsen zijn dan 'surface'". Dat vind ik in dit geval wel overtuigend. commented 2026-09-21 09:05:38 UTC by janhals ♦19 |
| 188997754 (Comments: 5) | Emmanuelle Guilbert (Discussed changesets: 2) | PS : si sur le terrain vous avez l'impression de faire un jeu de chasse au trésor ou un jeu de piste pour trouver la topologie du réseau imaginé par ses concepteurs, pas de problème c'est normal :-) commented 2026-09-21 09:04:23 UTC by StC ♦532 |
| 189311409 (Comments: 2) | mart2n (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Hinweis :) commented 2026-09-21 08:53:12 UTC by mart2n ♦1 |
| 189065462 (Comments: 2) | eri jahai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi eri jahai It is not good to add fictional, non-existent roads to the OpenStreetMap database. --Google Translation-- سلام eri jahai، افزودن جادههای خیالی و غیرواقعی به پایگا... commented 2026-09-21 08:51:36 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,374 |
| 189248317 (Comments: 2) | eri jahai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi eri jahai It is not good to add fictional, non-existent roads to the OpenStreetMap database. --Google Translation-- سلام eri jahai، افزودن جادههای خیالی و غیرواقعی به پایگا... commented 2026-09-21 08:51:36 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,374 |
| 189315937 (Comments: 1) | Parhampkzd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189334740 commented 2026-09-21 08:35:09 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189132381 (Comments: 2) | Руслан Т (Discussed changesets: 61) | Привет!) Списались в личных сообщениях. commented 2026-09-21 08:22:04 UTC by Руслан Т ♦58 |
| 189332138 (Comments: 1) | Astala Luna (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted this business addition to a grassed park area. You must place your business over the building you operate from and it has to be verifiable on the ground. Also…most of the tags you added are either not used in osm or are in an incorr... commented 2026-09-21 08:18:53 UTC by nevw ♦2,348 |
| 189333812 (Comments: 1) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 113) | I reverted this business addition to a grassed park area. You must place your business over the building you operate from and it has to be verifiable on the ground. Also…most of the tags you added are either not used in osm or are in an incorr... commented 2026-09-21 08:17:28 UTC by nevw ♦2,348 |
| 113538241 (Comments: 2) | RicoSc (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo KartKollektor, ja, nach dem Geoportal BW sind dies zwei getrennte Baugrundstücke. Das sie derzeit im Besitz einer Firma sind und als Wiese genutzt werden, ist gut möglich. Jedoch rechtlich ist es ein Baugrundstück, Flurstü... commented 2026-09-21 08:08:27 UTC by RicoSc ♦5 |
| 189333356 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Align Tesla Supercharger coordinates and update tags Source: https://www.tesla.com/en_AU/findus/location/supercharger/31617; https://supercharge.info/map?siteId=5376; ground survey / field verification; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/T... commented 2026-09-21 08:01:46 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 189333282 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Align Tesla Supercharger coordinates and update tags Source: https://www.tesla.com/en_AU/findus/location/supercharger/macleannswsupercharger; https://supercharge.info/map?siteId=2001; ground survey / field verification; https://wiki.openstr... commented 2026-09-21 07:59:25 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 189333219 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Align Tesla Supercharger coordinates and update tags Source: https://www.tesla.com/en_AU/findus/location/supercharger/32996; https://supercharge.info/map?siteId=5379; ground survey / field verification; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/T... commented 2026-09-21 07:58:16 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 189332200 (Comments: 2) | Rendima (Discussed changesets: 2) | Prima commented 2026-09-21 07:55:55 UTC by Rendima ♦1 |
| 189332923 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | ## Summary of Changes Aligned 16 micro-mapped individual Tesla Supercharger stall nodes with the official OpenStreetMap Tesla Motors tagging standard. • **Station**: Tesla Supercharger Coffs Harbour, NSW - Pacific Hwy (16 Stalls, 300 k... commented 2026-09-21 07:55:42 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 188911497 (Comments: 2) | bkrc (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tamamdır commented 2026-09-21 07:50:19 UTC by bkrc ♦2 |
| 187597044 (Comments: 2) | BlinkMaps (Discussed changesets: 4) | на основании каких правил вы редактируете так СНТ? commented 2026-09-21 07:46:44 UTC by BlinkMaps ♦4 |
| 164924418 (Comments: 1) | M_9999 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello M_9999, POIs like way/1377381193 shouldn't touch the road kerb. When walking on the sidewalk, you're not in the police academy - the sidewalk is part of public property. This also applies to other features like way/30089222, where the... commented 2026-09-21 07:44:26 UTC by Joel Koen ♦87 |
| 189332089 (Comments: 1) | Rendima (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-21 07:42:34 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189243107 (Comments: 4) | Wiggers42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The two Hapstead Halls and the former British Legion building are all one complex connected by link structures, if you look at the aerial and website photos. They're still deciding the name of the British Legion, probably the Village Club. I don... commented 2026-09-21 07:39:56 UTC by Wiggers42 ♦1 |
| 188949394 (Comments: 2) | FabianW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja, kein Asphalt, bin den gerade gegangen. Festes, verdichtetes Sand/Kieselgemisch. Ich setze das mal auf grade2 commented 2026-09-21 07:37:30 UTC by FabianW ♦1 |
| 189319950 (Comments: 3) | Codestream (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2026-09-21 07:32:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189310863 (Comments: 1) | Loljhh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189332077 commented 2026-09-21 07:30:38 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 188921603 (Comments: 6) | Liongrass (Discussed changesets: 6) | Great, I think this has been fixed before I got to it. I also don't see any incorrect pins on BTCMap. Thanks again for double-checking and all the support commented 2026-09-21 07:25:56 UTC by Liongrass ♦16 |
| 188697431 (Comments: 8) | kadamski (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dzięki @kadamski za tak duże zaangażowanie w wyjaśnienie problemu drogi 501 i niestety nie potrafię tak jednoznacznie tego określić jak Ty. Na rondzie w Lniskach i na węźle Żukowo widnieje oznaczenie DW 501, co tylko potwierdza, że ... commented 2026-09-21 07:17:41 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,117 |
| 187276200 (Comments: 2) | NDIIDN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi map per! Thanks a lot for the feedback and the corrections. I checked the current Esri World Imagery layer - indeed, the road is missing. Sorry, that was my mistake; I'll keep it in mind for future mapping. Best, NDIIDN. commented 2026-09-21 07:15:33 UTC by NDIIDN ♦1 |
| 189331051 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Align Kew Supercharger coordinates and update tags Source: https://www.tesla.com/en_AU/findus/location/supercharger/31621; https://supercharge.info/map?siteId=8375; ground survey / field verification; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag... commented 2026-09-21 07:06:00 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 68827514 (Comments: 3) | Blütenkirsche (Discussed changesets: 7) | Gruß buetenkirsche commented 2026-09-21 07:04:59 UTC by Blütenkirsche ♦2 |
| 189288921 (Comments: 1) | DR CALORIE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189330816 commented 2026-09-21 07:02:30 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189303238 (Comments: 2) | myssv (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok commented 2026-09-21 07:01:37 UTC by myssv ♦1 |
| 189327416 (Comments: 1) | L4PSA (Discussed changesets: 7) | might have been misclick commented 2026-09-21 06:43:29 UTC by L4PSA ♦9 |
| 189298634 (Comments: 4) | SMillerNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi, Ik heb bicycle=yes verwijderd, = no is ook niet nodig want alles is getagd als footway en daar mag je niet fietsen. foot=yes hoeft trouwens ook niet. Dat is default. Uiteraard zal er wel gefietst worden, maar daar mogen we bij d... commented 2026-09-21 06:38:14 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189107819 (Comments: 4) | Naoki_he (Discussed changesets: 1) | 迅速に点検していただきありがとうございます。 ・駐輪場について 多言語表記まわりの変更を確認しました。ありがとうございます 追加でおそらくbrand名が存在するのと、24... commented 2026-09-21 06:27:52 UTC by 大山かなめ ♦71 |
| 189302273 (Comments: 1) | andrewrunner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189328712 commented 2026-09-21 06:02:52 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189281473 (Comments: 1) | Dead_0hlin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189328322 commented 2026-09-21 05:48:16 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189328265 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Align Tesla Supercharger coordinates and update tags Source: https://www.tesla.com/en_AU/findus/location/supercharger/31602; https://supercharge.info/map?siteId=3603; ground survey / field verification; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/T... commented 2026-09-21 05:44:36 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 189280081 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | There were numerous errors with the original set that I wanted to fix. First and foremost, ramps should not have names. The fact that many primary links have names like "Arrivals," "Departures," and "Return to Terminal... commented 2026-09-21 05:40:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 189280198 (Comments: 1) | Hoàng Thị Tuw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189328023 commented 2026-09-21 05:34:29 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189302269 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | warum schreibst du die Hausnummer in den name=* und taggst addr:street die es nicht gibt? commented 2026-09-21 05:34:12 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189302523 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | warum schreibst du die Hausnummer in den name=* commented 2026-09-21 05:31:04 UTC by fs_LT ♦238 |
| 189303262 (Comments: 1) | CanXI (Discussed changesets: 15) | warum schreibst du die Hausnummer in den name=* commented 2026-09-21 05:28:16 UTC by fs_LT-repair ♦10 |
| 188848156 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | Okay, I will stop that. By the way, to save a lot of time, you can just use JOSM. commented 2026-09-21 05:22:44 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
 | 189292112 (Comments: 1) | new boy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189327666 commented 2026-09-21 05:21:36 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189307381 (Comments: 1) | Frey Marketing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Frey Marketing, hier hat sich etwas zum Nachteil verändert. Wichtige Informationen wurden gelöscht. Die user Seite besteht aus Werbung. Bitte die alten Informationen wieder herstellen und sich hier informieren: |
| 189326459 (Comments: 1) | awdaviswa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. commented 2026-09-21 05:14:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 188855096 (Comments: 2) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello Sheriff Jaco, Yes, you can use proposed:power=substation instead of power=proposed and proposed=substation; there is no need to keep both. I removed the additional tag because it repeated the existing information. Sorry my explana... commented 2026-09-21 05:12:03 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189298927 (Comments: 1) | ToastHawaii (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ah danke. Ich hab gestern einen Workshop gemach und wollte das demonstrieren. Tauchte dann aber nicht auf, und habe ihn dann vergessen. Danke fürs schliessen. commented 2026-09-21 05:07:26 UTC by ToastHawaii ♦6 |
| 189327329 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5528511 commented 2026-09-21 05:01:39 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 188074676 (Comments: 5) | Fountain0206 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Behind the OSM map data is a community of people that agree to some general guidelines about how to do things, and in many cases there are multiple approaches. Why I made a comment, though, is because what you seem to be creating as a standard practi... commented 2026-09-21 05:00:43 UTC by neuhausr ♦366 |
| 189319313 (Comments: 1) | YourLocalEnbyMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! Please check these nodes: https://www.osm.org/node/2311536624 https://www.osm.org/node/2311536626 https://www.osm.org/node/301322260 commented 2026-09-21 04:59:29 UTC by GerdP ♦2,874 |
| 189274897 (Comments: 1) | waynejesse12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the contribution. The opening_hours=* tag has a particular format that helps data consumers be able to more easily process opening hours in a computerized way. If you're interested, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_h... commented 2026-09-21 04:37:29 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189266414 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks. FYI, it looks like you added an extra semicolon at the end. I removed the semicolon. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-21 04:30:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189318438 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189326716 commented 2026-09-21 04:26:08 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189295111 (Comments: 1) | spughetti (Discussed changesets: 70) | You can make the replacement more complete by also changing note:lgbtq:* and source:lgbtq:* (see way/499331814) commented 2026-09-21 04:03:26 UTC by Vladislav Grechannik ♦9 |
| 189318544 (Comments: 1) | Trailguru100 (Discussed changesets: 12) | I think you have "broken" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2760132 and may be also https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/140636 commented 2026-09-21 03:57:45 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦191 |
| 189279032 (Comments: 1) | prince yadavv (Discussed changesets: 2) | You duplicated existing ways. Please stop using MapWIthAI without checking the existing data. Reverted. commented 2026-09-21 03:01:24 UTC by ratrun ♦305 |
| 189284820 (Comments: 1) | rohittt65 (Discussed changesets: 1) | You have duplicated ways, which already existed. Therefore I reverted this changeset. Please stop using MAPWithAI without checking existing data. commented 2026-09-21 02:54:18 UTC by ratrun ♦305 |
| 182854927 (Comments: 7) | RoseBTCmap (Discussed changesets: 6) | Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Good_practice#temporary_events_and_temporary_features_clarification. There is a strong pushback to discuss mapping tempy features elsewhere. Let me suggest joining the OSM US Slack and discuss the is... commented 2026-09-21 02:39:00 UTC by Glassman ♦6,040 |
| 189180210 (Comments: 2) | Darryl Wingfield (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lord have mercy why did you change every state-maintained road to primary and secondary?? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Values and also see how roads are generally tagged in the rest of the state. You will notice that mo... commented 2026-09-21 01:00:33 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦75 |
| 189238853 (Comments: 3) | orangbule (Discussed changesets: 2) | adapted commented 2026-09-21 00:37:10 UTC by orangbule ♦2 |
| 189321847 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Update Tesla Supercharger Thrumster tags to OSM Wiki standard Source: https://www.tesla.com/en_AU/findus/location/supercharger/32994; https://supercharge.info/map?siteId=7255; ground survey / field verification; https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2026-09-21 00:33:07 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 189321680 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | The GPS coordinates are wrote and were corrected to be -33.777684800303156, 151.12276691838855 commented 2026-09-21 00:24:08 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 189321590 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Update Tesla Supercharger Heatherbrae tags and coordinates per official Tesla page (https://www.tesla.com/en_AU/findus/location/supercharger/heatherbraesupercharger) & OSM Wiki standard Source: https://www.tesla.com/en_AU/findus/locatio... commented 2026-09-21 00:18:09 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 181482585 (Comments: 1) | adjuva (Discussed changesets: 61) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1237299601/history - are there any remains of this razed switch visible on the ground? commented 2026-09-21 00:00:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 185602584 (Comments: 1) | GarryX3D (Discussed changesets: 32) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428871549/history - in which sense wetland is disused? commented 2026-09-20 23:55:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187808013 (Comments: 4) | AlexC (Discussed changesets: 16) | Yeah you're right, can't really do it with established tags. I'm removed them and put the information in a description instead. Note hiking in groups is not required nor are reservations possible, its simply whichever party (ind... commented 2026-09-20 23:51:46 UTC by AlexC ♦4 |
 | 189320725 (Comments: 1) | B252697 (Discussed changesets: 53) | References: Marsiling People's Association (PA) website: https://marsiling.pa.gov.sg/arcadia-park-revitalization-a-brighter-healthier-community-space/ Official Facebook Post: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1201888541383018 |
| 189320763 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Desculpe a reversão, mas agora está correto! commented 2026-09-20 23:40:20 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189299116 (Comments: 1) | dmfr (Discussed changesets: 31) | Are you sure these are actually separate houses? From aerial these looked like forming a single building rather than multiple row houses commented 2026-09-20 22:47:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189319891 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | Description & Rationale: │ │ • Feature: Added/updated Tesla Supercharger (Node #6517096170) at (-33.310100, │ │ 151.420682). ... commented 2026-09-20 22:45:36 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 172539130 (Comments: 4) | AndersAndersson (Discussed changesets: 153) | Ok. Då tolkade jag beskrivningen i description:no fel. Dock bör ju en tunnel som leder vatten ha någon annan waterway-tag. commented 2026-09-20 22:37:01 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦660 |
| 189319710 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Essas ruas não tem sinalização e nenhuma placa, resolvi reverter como estava antes! commented 2026-09-20 22:35:54 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189202644 (Comments: 1) | Mapper237 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Und auch hier wieder ein krasser Fehler! Wie kommst du bitte auf die Idee, dass das Stück der Straße "Am Klosterholz" nördlich der Brücke über die Niederndorfer Straße angeblich "unpaced" w&a... commented 2026-09-20 22:32:20 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦157 |
| 189017471 (Comments: 1) | magritte21 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👋 It seems that you accidentally inserted the wrong data in the tag list: https://osm.org/node/14181049412 commented 2026-09-20 22:29:15 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,763 |
| 189202711 (Comments: 1) | Mapper237 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Was soll das nun wieder? Im Ernst: Du produzierst gerade eine Fülle an Fehlern, die völlig unnötig sind. An der Steudacher Straße hast du "sidewalk:both=separate" neu eingetragen - dosch das ist ganz klar falsch!... commented 2026-09-20 22:13:51 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦157 |
| 189036663 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hi LordGarySugar, I’ll split up Fforest Fawr along the roads. However, since the area is huge, this will take quite some time, and I’ll have to leave some temporary lines without tags in the area for the time being. Furthermore I w... commented 2026-09-20 22:09:23 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦28 |
| 189304700 (Comments: 3) | Stetson P (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply, explanation, and understanding despite my typo! commented 2026-09-20 22:05:47 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 189270213 (Comments: 1) | Rush Bowls Rino (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-20 22:01:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 137569788 (Comments: 1) | Etiennemapper5362 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, Merci d'avoir ajouté les trottoirs du 16e. Cependant idéalement ils ne devraient pas faire le tour du pâté de maison. En effet lorsque l'on passe dans le quartier cela rend impossible de com... commented 2026-09-20 21:59:59 UTC by fgouget ♦125 |
| 189202867 (Comments: 1) | Mapper237 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Und schon wieder machst du einen Fehler! Die Angabe über die Brückenkontruktion gehört an die Brücke selbst und nicht an die der Brückenfläche. Bitte hier die Empfehlungen des Wiki beachten. Ich habe es ebe... commented 2026-09-20 21:58:00 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦157 |
| 189202881 (Comments: 1) | Mapper237 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Und schon wieder eine sehr fragwürdige Änderung. Warum trägst du hier extra und völlig unnötig ein footway=yes ein, welches zuvor doch schon logisch so bestand und warum nur und nur auf der Brücke statt auf der gesamten ... commented 2026-09-20 21:54:12 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦157 |
| 189292977 (Comments: 1) | Mapper237 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Der Unterflurhydsrant war falsch positioniert, was ich eben korrigiert habe. Auch habe ich deine falsche Angabe gelöscht, dass sich der Hydrant angeblich auf dem "green" befände. Das ist falsch! Er befindet sich am Rande de... commented 2026-09-20 21:47:54 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦157 |
| 189212152 (Comments: 4) | happy5214 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Unprefixed tags removed (and other minor issues fixed) in changeset 189318702, thanks! commented 2026-09-20 21:46:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 162189120 (Comments: 1) | deweyjungles (Discussed changesets: 6) | The correct name is B Bar S, not B Bar South. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189318663 commented 2026-09-20 21:44:20 UTC by Allison P ♦1,150 |
| 189292998 (Comments: 1) | Mapper237 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wem bringt die Info etwas, dass man hier einträgt, dass es beidseitig KEINEN Radweg gibt? Das ist doch bitte eine recht nutzlose Information und daher nicht zielführend. Und warum trägst du das nur und nur auf diesem kurzen Absc... commented 2026-09-20 21:42:33 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦157 |
| 189316080 (Comments: 3) | Wilfred Dijksman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke...duidelijk. Mapse commented 2026-09-20 21:39:12 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189295236 (Comments: 1) | Mapper237 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ist "unpaved", also völlig ohne jegliche Befestigung - also auch ohne irgendwelche Steine/Schotter/Kiesel - als Oberfläche hier wirklich richtig? Bitte nochmal prüfen. commented 2026-09-20 21:37:14 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦157 |
| 189261140 (Comments: 1) | Wtberry (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: If the name of the street isn't correct, you can revise it yourself. I've sent you a DM with a bunch of info on OSM. Let me know if you need more help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://... commented 2026-09-20 21:31:51 UTC by Glassman ♦6,040 |
| 189296303 (Comments: 1) | Mapper237 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Diese Änderung ist nicht korrekt. Denn die parallel verlaufenden Wege sind "Fußwege" und eben keine "Rad- und Fußwege" bzw. "Radwege", weshalb deine Änderung nun hier fehlerhaft ist bzw. fehlerhafte... commented 2026-09-20 21:29:07 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦157 |
| 184076163 (Comments: 1) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Requesting a review of a changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189315049) which changed the route=* type. Thanks! commented 2026-09-20 21:23:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189241022 (Comments: 3) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 12) | Die Seite hat einen englischen Titel, die gibt es aber auch im deutschen Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments Inhalte decken sich im Wesentlichen, engl. Seite ist etwas ausführlicher. Das hat ... commented 2026-09-20 21:21:20 UTC by limes11 ♦1,106 |
| 1991493 (Comments: 1) | Schäuble Michele (Discussed changesets: 2) | Woah, da warst du aber früh dran. Hatte gerade die selbe Idee. commented 2026-09-20 21:14:11 UTC by stillhart ♦254 |
| 187002098 (Comments: 37) | carciofo (Discussed changesets: 21) | We're all here to learn and if you see mistakes in edits I've made, please, point them out. I'd rather learn from a mistake rather than keep making the same mistake over and over and over and over. My definition of "local e... commented 2026-09-20 21:10:29 UTC by txemt ♦86 |
| 189077657 (Comments: 3) | kirelagin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Huh, do you know where that documentation is? The main access page explicit warns against using `access=designated`: > Using this value with the plain access key, `access=designated`, has no meaning, and should not be used. https://wiki.... commented 2026-09-20 21:05:03 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189298907 (Comments: 3) | tuyl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahh.. vandaar.. De poi had ik ergens in het midden geplaatst. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-20 21:04:47 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 185440211 (Comments: 2) | Andi_Voss (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, der Hartmannhofer Bach fliesst nicht in den Landschaftssee. Ab der Strasse Am Neubruch fliesst er in einem Betonrohr nach NNW um dann in Höhe des Sees nach NO abzuknicken. Östlich der Dachauerstrasse tritt er wieder aus. Eine ... commented 2026-09-20 20:58:40 UTC by Andi_Voss ♦4 |
| 189315075 (Comments: 1) | 🧚🏻♂️ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. No está necesariamente mal lo que estás haciendo, pero hay varias maneras de agregar direcciones en condominios, y eso depende de la naturaleza del condominio. Por favor revisar los megacondominios en las afueras de Temuco,... commented 2026-09-20 20:50:48 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189316357 (Comments: 1) | Alex5288989 (Discussed changesets: 12) | review_requested \tyes Dag Alex.. Evt mofa=no Over microcar heb je niets toegevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-20 20:47:38 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189315928 (Comments: 1) | zsiraph (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv. A Magyar Helyesírás Szabályzata szerint kötőjellel írjuk a templomok nevét, amennyiben személynév + köznév összekötéséről van szó: https://ww... commented 2026-09-20 20:44:45 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189314176 (Comments: 1) | SteveLewis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Buiten de hekken heb ik access=no verwijderd. Binnen de hekken aangepast naar private MVG, Eggie Nam... commented 2026-09-20 20:41:31 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
 | 182203723 (Comments: 1) | Kubula (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted AI Edits and Building that was Imported during AfricaMapCup with Very Low Quality #tt_event Quality issues check and Fix commented 2026-09-20 20:37:02 UTC by KingVik ♦83 |
| 189294146 (Comments: 3) | Hase (Discussed changesets: 3) | Du kannst mir auch im Forum eine Nachricht schreiben. Da kann man Bilder ganz einfach via Drag&Drop einfügen. https://community.openstreetmap.org/u/osm_rogerwilco commented 2026-09-20 20:35:58 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦832 |
| 182194745 (Comments: 1) | JaneAmerica12 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted AI Edits and Building that was Imported during AfricaMapCup with Very Low Quality #tt_event Quality issues check and Fix commented 2026-09-20 20:28:05 UTC by KingVik ♦83 |
| 189225188 (Comments: 3) | Tangerine1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, Christine 👋, das mit den Solaranlagen habe ich heute "nebenbei" erledigt; ich habe das von Dir doppelt angelegte Bürgerhaus in Wetzlar/Büblingshausen entdeckt und dieses dann komplett überarbeitet (https://w... commented 2026-09-20 20:24:34 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦206 |
| 189015466 (Comments: 1) | Stefan378 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bród czy przepust https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14180976357#map=19/49.741728/21.129644&layers=N https://postimg.cc/gallery/xdwPD1x Co do przebiegu od rzeczki do zabudowań to niewiele mogę powiedzieć ale raczej nie... commented 2026-09-20 20:23:28 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦706 |
| 189301640 (Comments: 1) | ikiliki (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zdravo, Sve izmjene napravljene u ovom changesetu sam vratio u prethodno stanje. To se može vidjeti ovdje: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189315476 Molim vas da ne mijenjate maxspeed=RS:rural i maxspeed=RS:urban u numeričke v... commented 2026-09-20 20:22:03 UTC by soliMM ♦77 |
| 189305434 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:09:50 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189306402 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:09:47 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189306746 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:09:37 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189307213 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:09:34 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189308969 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:09:31 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189308998 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:09:13 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189309104 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:09:00 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189063610 (Comments: 1) | andrum99 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thank you for adding those paths; that resolved note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5353310 commented 2026-09-20 20:08:57 UTC by jayaddison ♦52 |
| 189309479 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:08:44 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189309579 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:08:15 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189309167 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:08:11 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189309688 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:08:09 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189309867 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:07:44 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189309938 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:07:36 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189310172 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:07:26 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189310231 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:07:18 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189310361 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:06:59 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 189310817 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | Halo. Saya mengamati Anda sedang memetakan RT dan RW menggunakan landuse=residential. Hal ini bukanlah cara yang benar untuk memetakan wilayah. Mohon untuk gunakan relasi boundary=administrative. Data landuse=residential hanya digunakan untuk mengind... commented 2026-09-20 20:06:05 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦87 |
| 147132202 (Comments: 3) | OSM_RogerWilco (Discussed changesets: 62) | Danke für die Erklärung! Ich meine mich auch erinnert zu haben, dass Diksussionen zu dem Thema genau das ergeben haben, daher die Nachfrage. commented 2026-09-20 20:04:34 UTC by chrstnbwnkl ♦6 |
| 189309162 (Comments: 1) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 207) | Допълнително коригирах сградата и входовете. И изместих входовете от задната страна да са поне малко по-срещуположни на предните. А по о... commented 2026-09-20 20:04:11 UTC by Fraxi ♦513 |
| 189314983 (Comments: 1) | vichada (Discussed changesets: 55) | Sorry, I forgot. .... gnss (rtk/sapos), bicycle, survey commented 2026-09-20 20:00:25 UTC by vichada ♦55 |
| 189305210 (Comments: 1) | mariya2001 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi mariya2001, amenity=health_post and/or healthcare=health_post are the most suitable tags for CHPS compounds commented 2026-09-20 20:00:11 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦187 |
| 167778105 (Comments: 2) | Jorisbo (Discussed changesets: 211) | Wow, year later 😀no problem , thanks to you for all the effort you put in improving our map . Kind regards Joris commented 2026-09-20 19:48:40 UTC by Jorisbo ♦165 |
| 188595540 (Comments: 1) | Simon OLMOS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je suis passé à Toulouges sans voir aucune trace sur le terrain de ces anciennes lignes, notamment des passages à niveau. Quel est le but de ces ajouts ? commented 2026-09-20 19:46:24 UTC by LySioS ♦157 |
| 141395241 (Comments: 2) | JumpingFox (Discussed changesets: 3) | Onestamente non saprei, mi fu riferito da mio nonno (nato prima della seconda guerra), ma ovviamente non è esattamente una sorgente rigorosa. ed essendo una semplice pillbox onestamente non saprei, è vero che il confine però ... commented 2026-09-20 19:45:08 UTC by JumpingFox ♦3 |
| 189314052 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | A Velocidade desse trecho é de 40 km/h commented 2026-09-20 19:33:51 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189179219 (Comments: 3) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 12) | Let me go fix that now. I didn't realize that the person who claimed it was fixed was a troll who commented false or vulgar information on a lot of random notes on Jul 30 and has done nothing else with the account. commented 2026-09-20 19:31:10 UTC by tjasz ♦3 |
| 189281269 (Comments: 2) | Potatoleum (Discussed changesets: 3) | I accidentally edited an underground pipeline. I fixed it now. commented 2026-09-20 19:25:26 UTC by Potatoleum ♦4 |
| 189084965 (Comments: 5) | P Diddy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Right, but what is your source for the places closing down? Where or how did you acquire that information? Anything added to OpenStreetMap must be verifiable, see https://osm.wiki/Verifiability , and as DWG member @Glassman reminded you via D... commented 2026-09-20 19:18:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189303732 (Comments: 2) | Simoxp93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Grazie per le info, cercherò di essere più preciso. commented 2026-09-20 19:17:11 UTC by Simoxp93 ♦1 |
| 188637740 (Comments: 1) | Negjana (Discussed changesets: 85) | Laut VzG gültig ab 7. September 2026 ist zwischen km 2,670 und km 4,034 immer noch vmax 80 km/h statt den eingetragenen 100 km/h. commented 2026-09-20 19:16:05 UTC by Linie29 ♦50 |
| 188948469 (Comments: 1) | josephantonyj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Le Taklamakan was not positionned at the right place. I'm trying to set it right, but you can double check commented 2026-09-20 19:08:18 UTC by greenscientist ♦2 |
| 189275944 (Comments: 6) | Cobrapond (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yah thanks for improving your area, happy mapping! commented 2026-09-20 19:08:06 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 189276384 (Comments: 4) | LGloaguen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Toute les ruelles, comme les rues, sont routables à vélo par défaut, ce qui n'est pas le cas des sentiers piéton, d'où l'intérêt de manquer ce segment comme "possible" commented 2026-09-20 18:55:46 UTC by greenscientist ♦2 |
| 189235827 (Comments: 1) | HostileSpark (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you for the up-to-date information. Wasn't really sure what you meant by the political rant - I just think it's important to know what's being built in our communities, and this site seemed pretty useful. commented 2026-09-20 18:43:35 UTC by Jons Icoli ♦4 |
| 188792013 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 143) | It means not yet used. Unfortunately no option for that in Every Door. commented 2026-09-20 18:40:23 UTC by Omnific ♦241 |
| 189262591 (Comments: 1) | Hubert12345 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Jaki był powód połączenia odrębnych fragmentów pól w jedną relację? commented 2026-09-20 18:39:42 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦995 |
| 189299221 (Comments: 1) | Jane Doe is me (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-20 18:38:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189304972 (Comments: 1) | Wereldkaart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-20 18:37:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 165983875 (Comments: 1) | Amineee__ (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello, please don't draw buildings from their roof, but their actual spot on the ground, or else they'll cross roads like it's the case on your changeset. Thanks! commented 2026-09-20 18:34:27 UTC by atlasmountains ♦4 |
| 189258483 (Comments: 1) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 211) | Moin, für ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dpergola dürfte building=yes inkorrekt sein, oder? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189258483<... commented 2026-09-20 18:32:52 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,350 |
| 130615409 (Comments: 2) | Mond00 (Discussed changesets: 85) | Der Eintrag ist zu lange her. Bitte an die aktuellen Gegebenheiten anpassen commented 2026-09-20 18:26:58 UTC by Mond00 ♦83 |
| 145379487 (Comments: 1) | Lena Schimmel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Lena, hier hat jemand zahlreiche Hinweise/Fehlermeldungen hinterlassen zu den von dir erfassten Eingängen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11028641069#map=19/51.963035/7.573172&layers=N Kannst du eventuell etwas zu... commented 2026-09-20 18:26:45 UTC by qugeb ♦107 |
| 189307238 (Comments: 1) | Mr Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted commented 2026-09-20 18:25:42 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
| 189057408 (Comments: 1) | luleiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14182855523 eine Anmerkung; Überflurhydrant und Grundwasser passen nicht wirklich zusammen. Und wenn das Teil der Bewässerung dient, ist das nicht wirklich emergency=fire_hydrant. Vielleich... commented 2026-09-20 18:24:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 189297010 (Comments: 1) | sk_15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:check%20date podobnie jak wszystkie inne daty powinien być formatowany wg normy ISO 8601 czyli RRRR-MM-DD. Tag name powinien odzwierciedlać faktyczną nazwę własną obiektu, więc jeśli takiej nie ... commented 2026-09-20 18:21:00 UTC by VJMK ♦26 |
| 189311064 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Revertido a alteração de velocidade de ruas que não possui sinalização do que estava antes! commented 2026-09-20 18:19:11 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189310682 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 36) | https://www.facebook.com/100066769658378/photos/d41d8cd9/1453742886861353/?set=a.426424549593197 commented 2026-09-20 18:10:53 UTC by Youness_ss ♦18 |
| 189307945 (Comments: 2) | Remlicht89 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dankjewel. De relaties blijven lastig bij aanpassingen via de editor van osm zelf. Doe mijn best om ze zo goed mogelijk aan te laten sluiten en om te leggen, maar blijkbaar blijf ik soms stukjes missen. commented 2026-09-20 18:06:40 UTC by Remlicht89 ♦14 |
| 189310315 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 14) | this is adding levels to the buildings I was walking by commented 2026-09-20 18:04:04 UTC by synthfi ♦28 |
| 189308530 (Comments: 1) | MMBosch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Benvingut a OSM! Abans de pujar el teu conjunt de canvis, consulta a la wiki com etiquetar les rotondes, que han d'anar amb l'etiqueta "junction=roundabout". Procura també de no trencar relacions de bus al editar les rotond... commented 2026-09-20 17:49:20 UTC by marcmarti ♦106 |
| 189307306 (Comments: 1) | brunoct (Discussed changesets: 2) | et aussi Bouverans (25085) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839227156 commented 2026-09-20 17:43:31 UTC by brunoct ♦3 |
| 181543614 (Comments: 2) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 376) | Igen, du ser ikke på historikken. commented 2026-09-20 17:42:28 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,927 |
| 189308436 (Comments: 1) | brunoct (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pas Bremondans, mais Bretigney 25093 commented 2026-09-20 17:38:59 UTC by brunoct ♦3 |
| 186534877 (Comments: 6) | sksm cto (Discussed changesets: 5) | As it written on the MAP article, this road is called Donald J. Trump Highway and not Voie Express Donald Trump. I will rename the road accordingly. commented 2026-09-20 17:28:53 UTC by atlasmountains ♦4 |
| 181597199 (Comments: 1) | MapperrZPolski (Discussed changesets: 21) | A czy pieszy przejdzie? Wiedzie tamtędy Lubelska Droga Świętego Jakuba. commented 2026-09-20 17:09:17 UTC by justynabu ♦10 |
| 189237741 (Comments: 4) | Rogers A (Discussed changesets: 3) | I emailed InstaVolt rather than phoning them, but all I can do is record what they say if different. I have just been busy tidying up the map with roads and grassed areas, tidying up buildings according to the map. Just making it look tidier and make... commented 2026-09-20 17:03:38 UTC by Rogers A ♦2 |
| 183935023 (Comments: 1) | BryanOSullivan (Discussed changesets: 11) | If you're connecting a dirt track directly to an interstate highway, you might take a moment to double check conditions around the highway. This changeset connected way/1528232844 to I 15, but as with most interstate highways, there's a fen... commented 2026-09-20 17:02:19 UTC by Kai Johnson ♦182 |
| 189307254 (Comments: 1) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 35) | sorry I forgot I did a couple other things too! commented 2026-09-20 16:51:52 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦16 |
| 189281218 (Comments: 1) | Hubert12345 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Tak "poprawiłeś", że narysowałeś zygzak, zamiast prostej drogi. Wycofuję, Twoje zmiany od początku "kariery" na OSM nie budzą zaufania. commented 2026-09-20 16:47:05 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦995 |
| 188234465 (Comments: 1) | Jaleks (Discussed changesets: 23) | Kann ich bestätigen. Wollte ich auch gerade ändern. commented 2026-09-20 16:46:48 UTC by Josch_Ler ♦1 |
| 189225415 (Comments: 1) | LukasM04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good! Thank you for adding this info to the map! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189225415 commented 2026-09-20 16:43:06 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189223505 (Comments: 1) | Rogers A (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nice nice! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189223505 commented 2026-09-20 16:39:41 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189301747 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Generally looks good! Few minor problems but not enough to mark bad. Is there any specific reason you chose to use Mapbox imagery rather than the Bing imagery here? The Bing imagery looks like it shows the same features and is higher resolutio... commented 2026-09-20 16:37:07 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189295441 (Comments: 9) | UL-mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Vispassage weer in stream omgezet. Niet echt mooi. Op het vlak staat het wel. Up to you om te kijken wat je wil. :) commented 2026-09-20 16:29:07 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189279965 (Comments: 1) | fercs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por las contribuciones! Revisé el conjunto de cambios. La rotonda no estaba mal, o cuál es el fix? Supongo que las aplicaciones de ruteo antes indicarían tomar la rotonda hasta la primera salida y ahora no? |
| 189274608 (Comments: 6) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 983) | Je viens d'aller voir. Effectivement les deux nouveaux arrêts créés sont abandonnés. Les citadines devaient provoquer des bouchons ? C'est maintenant un arrêt unique provisoire au bout de la bande bus + taxi... commented 2026-09-20 16:13:03 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦265 |
| 188964046 (Comments: 1) | Hajtman Zoltán (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv. Az iskola területe szuper, de ilyenkor a magába foglalt épületekről érdemes levenni az adatokat, mivel azok már inkább a területen értelmezhetők. Két épületre &ea... commented 2026-09-20 16:10:05 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 188651823 (Comments: 4) | q_un_go (Discussed changesets: 125) | Ich sehe, dass ich unerwünscht bin. Ich werde auch den ÖPNV im RVF erst einmal nicht auf die neuen Linien umstellen. Ich sitze da beruflich an der Quelle (Ich bin letztlich die Quelle, denn alle Daten bis auf VAG kommen da von mir). ... commented 2026-09-20 16:08:11 UTC by q_un_go ♦98 |
| 189284015 (Comments: 4) | Riiko (Discussed changesets: 3) | Köszönöm szépen a segítséget, módosítottam a szerkesztést! commented 2026-09-20 15:43:46 UTC by Riiko ♦3 |
| 188114179 (Comments: 2) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 271) | Moin, gefixt. vg commented 2026-09-20 15:40:31 UTC by ma-rt-in ♦1,775 |
| 189206024 (Comments: 4) | Abharsair (Discussed changesets: 2) | I didn't mean you to delete it, just remove the tags you added! commented 2026-09-20 15:35:33 UTC by DaveF ♦1,688 |
| 189295212 (Comments: 1) | Faiz Affandi (Discussed changesets: 1) | apcb? commented 2026-09-20 15:32:15 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189099414 (Comments: 1) | Bal4zsOSMap (Discussed changesets: 2) | Üdv. Kérlek rajzolásnál használd a legújabb (2015-ös vagy néhol 2016-os) FÖMI légifotókat, mert ezek 20-40 cm pontosak. Ha Binget kell használnod, akkor igazítsd elt... commented 2026-09-20 15:31:58 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189296189 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 22) | ini nomor rumah? jika nomor rumah, jangan taruh di kolom nama, tapi di kolom alamat commented 2026-09-20 15:31:33 UTC by FajrAl ♦831 |
| 189259124 (Comments: 8) | GuidoOberhaeuser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Stimmt. Aber wenn man nur sie Adresse eingibt, was viele machen, landet man ganz woanders. commented 2026-09-20 15:29:15 UTC by GuidoOberhaeuser ♦1 |
| 188786640 (Comments: 2) | tintinmaster (Discussed changesets: 10) | Puh, da muss ich wohl ziemlich übel gefettfingert haben. Das ist natürlich ziemlich offensichtlich kein Laubbaum. Weiß nicht was da bei mir los war commented 2026-09-20 15:29:04 UTC by tintinmaster ♦9 |
| 189293080 (Comments: 1) | elisha_maps (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo. I reverted your change because of using Bing imagery. In Hungary, we use the latest FÖMI orthophotos, which have around 20-40 cm precision: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Ortofot%C3%B3k#F%C3%96MI_(Lechner)_ortofot%C3%B3k commented 2026-09-20 15:27:57 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189300309 (Comments: 1) | Robin Mazzeo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, auch hier: auf der sicheren Seite wärst du mit https://opendata.rhein-kreis-neuss.de/explore/assets/gv-bevoelkerungsdaten_31-12-2025/export/ Dort gilt die Creative Commons CC Zero License. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-20 15:27:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 150987168 (Comments: 1) | Dudutazo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hola. por favor no agregar tags de direcciones a lomos de toro. salu2 commented 2026-09-20 15:26:26 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,419 |
| 189301195 (Comments: 1) | Robin Mazzeo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, die Daten sind bestimmt irgendwo mit einer Lizenz abrufbar, die auch in OSM nutzbar sind. Die von dir angegebene Seite hat unten den Vermerk "2026 © Düsseldorf" - damit sind die Daten für OSM erst einmal nicht n... commented 2026-09-20 15:23:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,641 |
| 188399705 (Comments: 3) | talbers1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Does your place offer any kind of service or sell any goods, that is relevant enough to be on the map by name? If not, this is considered private information and does not belong to the general public: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_priva... commented 2026-09-20 15:17:55 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
| 189302930 (Comments: 1) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 12) | • Feature: Added/updated Tesla Supercharger (Node #11433418128) at (-31.457860, │ │ 152.826860). │ │ • Tagging Schema: Conforms to OSM Wiki stand... commented 2026-09-20 15:15:15 UTC by Glenn Stewart ♦12 |
| 189302541 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Revertido velocidade dessas ruas como estava antes commented 2026-09-20 15:07:14 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189302292 (Comments: 1) | AwFi (Discussed changesets: 10) | fixed locality name and buildings* commented 2026-09-20 15:01:47 UTC by AwFi ♦61 |
| 189260117 (Comments: 2) | Luther69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nu var det kun fordi husnummeret mangler på vores bygning. commented 2026-09-20 14:57:45 UTC by Luther69 ♦1 |
| 189294667 (Comments: 3) | UL-mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Meestal laat een hek wandelaars wel door in de navigatie, maar dan is het wat duidelijker. commented 2026-09-20 14:47:38 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189281845 (Comments: 1) | yeeto da cheeto (Discussed changesets: 3) | According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=busway Bus-only service roads are short service roads that leads away from the main carriageway to a bus system administration, operations facility (e.g., bus terminal, bus garage, etc.)... commented 2026-09-20 14:43:43 UTC by kenken234 ♦48 |
| 189301415 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Revertido velocidade de vias coletoras sem sinalização em Juiz de Fora, como estava antes commented 2026-09-20 14:42:03 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 188545602 (Comments: 1) | Zuzanna Szklarz (Discussed changesets: 9) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-09-20 14:41:40 UTC by Frans S ♦11,030 |
| 189294608 (Comments: 1) | UL-mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-20 14:32:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189300964 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Revertido velocidade de vias em Rio Casca não sinalizadas do que estava antes commented 2026-09-20 14:32:08 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189190892 (Comments: 1) | Tom Lauwers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap en bedankt voor je bijdrage! Probeer altijd een landcode toe te voegen, zoals +32, wanneer je een telefoonnummer invoert, zodat iedereen, waar die ook is, dat nummer kan bellen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phon... commented 2026-09-20 14:14:35 UTC by m8324 ♦18 |
| 185536720 (Comments: 2) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 172) | Tak, z projektu. Powinienem był dać construction:highway=* commented 2026-09-20 14:14:17 UTC by Anas masuris ♦213 |
| 189298971 (Comments: 1) | NL91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag N L, Dit stond al op access=no . Wat was het probleem? Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-20 14:13:20 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189290218 (Comments: 3) | narya (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sorry about that. I’ve been there today. The walkable path ends in the middle of the mole. To go further you’d have to (dangerously) climb over rock and rubble. commented 2026-09-20 14:10:21 UTC by narya ♦5 |
| 189195817 (Comments: 3) | d177e3ff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je n'utilise pas Streetcomplete, mais ce n'est pas la première fois que j'observe ce "bug" qui en fait est un double bug : - dédoublement d'un noeud (dit autrement, 2 noeuds l'un sur l'autre) |
| 189254031 (Comments: 2) | LokNeko (Discussed changesets: 11) | 回复：YPGGUUY 高架段限速80-100，可以给trunk，隧道段限速60，给个primary差不多了 commented 2026-09-20 14:08:20 UTC by LokNeko ♦21 |
 | 189285122 (Comments: 1) | ray kao 0418 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您好，OpenStreetMap是全球的計畫，請勿隨意溍添加現實不存在的事物 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189299831 commented 2026-09-20 14:04:31 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,374 |
| 189293649 (Comments: 1) | Hase (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zeichen 250 ist vehicle=no. Ich ändere das mal fix... Siehe auch: https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE?signs=DE:250 Viele Grüße Roger Wilco commented 2026-09-20 14:03:27 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦832 |
| 189299219 (Comments: 1) | LiJu09 (Discussed changesets: 5) | oprava: Sedmerovec nové adresy commented 2026-09-20 13:55:37 UTC by LiJu09 ♦11 |
 | 189026815 (Comments: 1) | sunbold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189299170 commented 2026-09-20 13:52:04 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 188875851 (Comments: 2) | Cleverson Cândido (Discussed changesets: 11) | Altere para categoria apropriada se está errado. commented 2026-09-20 13:33:39 UTC by Cleverson Cândido ♦9 |
| 189293842 (Comments: 3) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Das ist natürlich absolut richtig! Die Änderung ging durch OpenClimbing, da scheint etwas nicht zu passen. Ich werde es in das Projekt bringen. Danke dir! commented 2026-09-20 13:32:44 UTC by elnappo ♦6 |
| 189297991 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Revertido alteração de velocidade de ruas não sinalizadas do que estava antes commented 2026-09-20 13:24:58 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 189297258 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 87) | Essa extensão tem placas indicando o limite máximo de até 60 km/h para não causar risco de colisão commented 2026-09-20 13:09:38 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦91 |
| 188576868 (Comments: 5) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 176) | Ok, byłem na miejscu. Twoje wieści się sprawdziły. Faktycznie jest otoczony płotem od co najmniej 3 stron. Natomiast wygląda również na skończone, a przynajmniej na tyle co widziałem przez płot, ścieżki i wszelkie elem... commented 2026-09-20 12:57:01 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,488 |
| 188868038 (Comments: 3) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi cr0wb0y, No worries, and thanks for getting back to me. I just made sure the relevant information is kept on OpenStreetMap while outdated information is removed. Thank you for your contributions, and please let us know if we can be of any h... commented 2026-09-20 12:45:46 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189128971 (Comments: 2) | WebfootJack (Discussed changesets: 3) | Also, since you are interested in road classification, I'd like to invite you to discuss on the OSM US Slack Server https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ (there is a #highway-classification channel to discuss precisely these sorts of changes) commented 2026-09-20 12:26:48 UTC by 1998alexkane ♦93 |
| 186217125 (Comments: 1) | Bennydicted (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there, what is "Hong Kong Basemap"? commented 2026-09-20 11:58:50 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 187939689 (Comments: 3) | fick89 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks! There is "recycling:textiles" - also it's not clear how it exactly distinguishes from "recycling:clothes". There are also a few cases of "recycling:household_linen", although there is no docume... commented 2026-09-20 11:56:57 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 186180803 (Comments: 1) | kerguelen_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Why did you remove `building=`?????? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189293850 commented 2026-09-20 11:53:39 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 175190810 (Comments: 1) | Pawe1909 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo Pawe1909, dieser Änderungssatz ergänzt an sechs Teilstücken maxspeed-Werte. Ich habe sie wieder rausgenommen, weil die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen dort von der Fahrtrichtung abhängen und daher mit maxspeed:for... commented 2026-09-20 11:32:06 UTC by MrAnderson ♦12 |
| 189150022 (Comments: 1) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189292852 commented 2026-09-20 11:29:56 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189292567 (Comments: 1) | mechka (Discussed changesets: 10) | The restaurant was last updated 15 years ago. Since then its building has been razed and a new apartment building is in its place. commented 2026-09-20 11:25:38 UTC by mechka ♦10 |
| 189289025 (Comments: 2) | SMillerNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | access=no heb ik weer terugezet.. Wellicht kun je een vlak landuse=construction intekenen op de plaats van de bouwput. Mapse commented 2026-09-20 11:18:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189246352 (Comments: 3) | Stu Bacon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CanopyFalls, thanks for your time reviewing my changes, I've made another edit to add the entrance/exit features from your other feedback, I also found the footway tag and swapped it onto the boardwalk. Good idea about attaching a footpath to... commented 2026-09-20 11:16:57 UTC by Stu Bacon ♦2 |
| 189257001 (Comments: 2) | RushMM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Amazing, glad that worked out fine! Thanks for checking, much appreciated --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189257001 commented 2026-09-20 11:14:01 UTC by RushMM ♦12 |
| 189273785 (Comments: 1) | n5200610061006200 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bei einem Revert sich über halbe Sachen zu echauffieren und dann way/595190055 zu übersehen ist auch bissl ironisch, oder? commented 2026-09-20 11:13:23 UTC by hlfan ♦119 |
| 188971806 (Comments: 2) | Speedy_1966 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da keine Antwort und Luftbilder eindeutig, geändert. commented 2026-09-20 11:06:44 UTC by limes11 ♦1,106 |
| 189287775 (Comments: 1) | Allibaba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-20 11:01:14 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189245910 (Comments: 2) | Stu Bacon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CanopyFalls, thanks very much for reviewing my edit. I've now made another to correct my error with the hide, attach the paths and add the suggested entrance/exit features. Thanks again for your time :). commented 2026-09-20 10:59:41 UTC by Stu Bacon ♦2 |
| 189289286 (Comments: 2) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 418) | Bedankt voor je reactie, Wellicht heb je hier iets aan: https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.37375,4.648716,19/?datastrip=20260905_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO Mapse commented 2026-09-20 10:59:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 6236147 (Comments: 2) | jensibensi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dann am besten gleich korrigieren... commented 2026-09-20 10:48:16 UTC by jensibensi ♦1 |
| 189289425 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 418) | Dat hele stuk Oorkondelaan is nu afgesloten als bouwput. En in de plannen komt het daarna ook niet meer terug als weg. commented 2026-09-20 10:47:14 UTC by SMillerNL ♦4 |
| 189288843 (Comments: 3) | SMillerNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ja, dat was een foutje van mij in CoMaps. Moet inderdaad op het gebouw zijn commented 2026-09-20 10:44:59 UTC by SMillerNL ♦4 |
| 181779056 (Comments: 1) | Luwigalons (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you mapped abandoned 'canals' that are rendered but do not exist anymore. Are you sure you want this? Note that Openstreetmap is not to map features that do not exist (anymore) commented 2026-09-20 10:43:29 UTC by Martin Borsje ♦758 |
| 189290200 (Comments: 1) | CirnoBaka (Discussed changesets: 9) | buildings and drive-throughs* commented 2026-09-20 10:34:45 UTC by CirnoBaka ♦15 |
| 189288019 (Comments: 1) | Mefus Wyllt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bore da Please don't delete valid objects from the database. If they are private then the correct approach is to tag them as such. I have reverted this edit and added access=private to the car park and access road. Diolch Phil commented 2026-09-20 10:34:42 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,822 |
| 189244227 (Comments: 3) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ikke fri fantasi. Jeg studerede højdekurver for at finde ud af, hvor vandet måtte løbe. Vandrør og andre undergrundsobjekter har generelt ikke meget "grund truth" medmindre man går hen og graver flere... commented 2026-09-20 10:26:36 UTC by cyclist789 ♦126 |
| 189205993 (Comments: 1) | Maxie Bernmobil (Discussed changesets: 2) | Genau wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189206115 sind die Haltekanten hier schon als Punkte erfasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7054119599 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7054119600). Diese können als Fläche... commented 2026-09-20 10:24:52 UTC by habi ♦2,268 |
| 189206115 (Comments: 1) | Maxie Bernmobil (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey Maxie Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Haltekanten, wie du sie hier als https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1560143940 und https://www.openstreetmap.o... commented 2026-09-20 10:22:39 UTC by habi ♦2,268 |
| 189243917 (Comments: 1) | ilos14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Change looks good! Welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189243917 commented 2026-09-20 10:19:00 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189269884 (Comments: 1) | TMS0926 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thanks a lot for adding extra places to OSM. However, we observed a few errors which you made. This may happen when you are doing your first edits, but please make sure not to do them again. 1. There is... commented 2026-09-20 10:10:34 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,080 |
| 189254400 (Comments: 4) | Nimleth (Discussed changesets: 4) | Als ze daar ook een theorielokaal hebben, dan lijkt me amenity=sailing_school niet verkeerd nee, dat kon ik op hun website niet zien. Ik heb het toegevoegd. commented 2026-09-20 10:09:20 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦799 |
| 189085351 (Comments: 1) | Raiderpoer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. He revertido este cambio. Parece que sigue existiendo un contenedor de reciclaje en esta ubicación. Pasé esta mañana con la bici y había un contenedor verde: https://drive.proton.me/urls/B7KC57B67W#YplG... commented 2026-09-20 10:05:55 UTC by dcapillae ♦460 |
| 189288865 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 71) | hey, can you guys make sure your edits align with the buildings. some of the roads had overlap and most are now zig zag. alleys are not residential streets commented 2026-09-20 10:03:42 UTC by ieguy3 ♦72 |
| 189273316 (Comments: 1) | NumberniaNorth149 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nice work! This all looks good! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189273316 commented 2026-09-20 10:03:40 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦122 |
| 189195965 (Comments: 6) | raheem_kashif (Discussed changesets: 1) | @raheem_kashif You are absolutely right… to say that other people have also made this error. commented 2026-09-20 09:53:25 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,080 |
 | 189281598 (Comments: 1) | Marionka+×÷ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Visa šita informacija jau buvo įvesta. Sutvarkiau/ištryniau. commented 2026-09-20 09:53:20 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,127 |
| 189287707 (Comments: 2) | Ksebo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Lényegében igen, mivel kisebb cserjék, fák nőnek az úton a magasabb fű mellett. Biztos van aki azon is végigmegy, de nem ajánlott. Ellenben az erdő szélén az út jól... commented 2026-09-20 09:50:54 UTC by Ksebo ♦1 |
| 189247480 (Comments: 2) | geraunz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ok bei Mapillary gefunden, das stimmt so tatsächlich. Habe den vehicle-tag entfernt. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-20 09:50:05 UTC by limes11 ♦1,106 |
| 189287472 (Comments: 1) | mslevi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Szia. Kiskunfélegyházán van újabb, 2016-os FÖMI lefedettség, ami egy kicsivel pontosabb. commented 2026-09-20 09:44:40 UTC by qstep ♦248 |
 | 174202696 (Comments: 1) | mzve (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi mzve, Are you working for a company, or just capture as a hobby. Please stop importing buildings that does not exist. commented 2026-09-20 09:43:04 UTC by Stephanievanr ♦4 |
| 189285044 (Comments: 1) | TomTulp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo TomTulp, das ist doch keine offizielle Webseite? commented 2026-09-20 09:42:28 UTC by JochenOSM ♦145 |
| 189286407 (Comments: 1) | suikerwafel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag suikerwafel.. Probeer op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Ik heb het aangepast. Geen spatie in postcodes svp. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-20 09:36:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189286582 (Comments: 1) | Madpausa (Discussed changesets: 3) | It's okay.. Gr eggie commented 2026-09-20 09:34:49 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 172487707 (Comments: 1) | hofoen (Discussed changesets: 73) | Deine Autokorrektur hat es ins Forum geschafft 😁 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lustige-sachen-d/141918/734 Ich habs malnauf ref angepasst👋 commented 2026-09-20 09:15:26 UTC by Hedaja ♦144 |
| 188619064 (Comments: 3) | Truthahnblatt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Merhabalar, çok fazla hesap değiştirince artık takip etmiyordum, meğerse hala devam ediyormuş. uyarınız ve tavsiyeniz için teşekkürler commented 2026-09-20 09:10:54 UTC by Alikam ♦13 |
| 159391494 (Comments: 1) | Felicity Hatton (Discussed changesets: 3) | Presumably this is for Rodriguez Pass. Is it really 'permanently' closed? (National Parks web site has it closed for now, but doesn't say anything about this being permanent.) There are tags available to mark this as temporarily or per... commented 2026-09-20 09:01:37 UTC by mrpulley ♦269 |
| 181718695 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | Thanks for catching that typo. commented 2026-09-20 08:57:13 UTC by Kees 59 ♦131 |
| 189285069 (Comments: 3) | Madpausa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks, I'll migrate these properties to the address node and remove them from here commented 2026-09-20 08:50:52 UTC by Madpausa ♦2 |
| 165592411 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 155) | Hi, i think that’s fine. We can have a way with landuse=religious and a seperate relation with boundary=protected_area , which matches how unesco world heritage sites are mapped in other countries commented 2026-09-20 08:50:38 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦509 |
| 188903490 (Comments: 1) | AlexTies (Discussed changesets: 11) | add operator to motorway commented 2026-09-20 08:44:31 UTC by AlexTies ♦6 |
| 189128026 (Comments: 1) | AlexTies (Discussed changesets: 11) | add Operator to motorway commented 2026-09-20 08:43:52 UTC by AlexTies ♦6 |
| 189194261 (Comments: 2) | AlexTies (Discussed changesets: 11) | add Operator tag to motorway commented 2026-09-20 08:43:09 UTC by AlexTies ♦6 |
| 155222374 (Comments: 1) | Felicity Hatton (Discussed changesets: 3) | Just spotted by chance that you've deleted Jungle Circuit again. When you last deleted this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144648041 I asked some questions that you never answered (which is why I reverted the deletion at https://www.... commented 2026-09-20 08:43:02 UTC by mrpulley ♦269 |
| 189145048 (Comments: 1) | Bernhard W (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hallo Bernhard, Die Straße wurde hier wegen Brückenschäden an der B9 auf unbestimmte Zeit gesperrt. Ich schlage vor, hier zusätzlich access:conditional = no zu setzen, aber der Zeitraum ist nicht klar. commented 2026-09-20 08:35:19 UTC by martried ♦10 |
| 189284147 (Comments: 1) | rewel1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Fixed postcode en openingstijden. Niet office=consulting? --- \tAn office for a consulting firm, providing expert professional advice to other companies or or... commented 2026-09-20 08:22:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189282765 (Comments: 1) | WindowsDefen517 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, je ne comprends votre modification, en commentaire vous mettez que vous avez ajouté le radar alors que vous avez supprimé la caméra. Quelle est la situation sur place ? commented 2026-09-20 08:00:44 UTC by Syl ♦1,120 |
| 189264067 (Comments: 12) | Alex5288989 (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.ad.nl/hoeksche-waard/fietsers-rijden-door-verkeerde-tunnelbuis-en-worden-op-bon-geslingerd-zeven-boetes-in-kwartier-tijd~a48d0040/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F commented 2026-09-20 07:52:10 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 177120162 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 104) | note it is terraced, not terrace - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466363477/history see also https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2902 commented 2026-09-20 07:41:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189240467 (Comments: 2) | Lyon-St-Clair (Discussed changesets: 107) | ah d'accord, je ne comprenais pas cette situation, tu peux reverter si tu veux, et idéalement en mettant une note expliquant le pourquoi du comment. commented 2026-09-20 07:27:27 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦136 |
| 186035678 (Comments: 1) | owennson (Discussed changesets: 111) | Why did you remove `footway=sidewalk`? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189283049 commented 2026-09-20 07:25:51 UTC by kingkingHK ♦436 |
| 189280893 (Comments: 5) | Madpausa (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738492381 CTRL-F5 to refresh your screen. commented 2026-09-20 07:25:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189261940 (Comments: 2) | MPictor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merged info.. commented 2026-09-20 07:16:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 153810594 (Comments: 1) | Andrex88 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231152074/history has building:flats = 137, 138 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to express addr... commented 2026-09-20 07:13:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 183555972 (Comments: 1) | dmfr (Discussed changesets: 31) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5528786 ? commented 2026-09-20 07:07:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187956170 (Comments: 3) | Farcilix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Het is gewoon oke.. zie navigatie https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=53.041628%2C6.656417%3B53.044207%2C6.657844 Misschien kijk je nog naar het oude scherm en zit de cache je in de weg. |
| 182960751 (Comments: 1) | Rohaut (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5528770 - can you take look at it? commented 2026-09-20 06:57:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189271571 (Comments: 2) | sarlam (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het is oke zo... Er is geen andere adresnode. commented 2026-09-20 06:55:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 168021147 (Comments: 1) | Reitseminare (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo @Reitseminare du hast über den name-tag versucht das Gelände als privat zu kennzeichnen. Das entspricht nicht den Richtlinien (die man im osm-wiki nachlesen kann). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen Ich habe das z... commented 2026-09-20 06:54:05 UTC by HAmap ♦80 |
| 189274681 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel G Mendes (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Gabriel, I merged the info with the addressnode. Gr eggie commented 2026-09-20 06:52:38 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189280595 (Comments: 2) | alveel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Info samengevoegd commented 2026-09-20 06:51:33 UTC by eggie ♦47,396 |
| 189281960 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 651) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/verwaiste-streetcomplete-hinweise/147881/10 commented 2026-09-20 06:43:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 187808692 (Comments: 1) | levpmk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ethän merkkaile Kuusamontietä pyöräilylle/jalankululle kielletyksi, koska se ei sitä ole. Ainoastaan Typpitien ja Hintantien välillä pohjoisen kaistat on C15-merkillä kielletty. Kesällä kävin kok... commented 2026-09-20 06:27:17 UTC by todeveni ♦16 |
| 183774776 (Comments: 3) | free_as_a_bird (Discussed changesets: 26) | Lieben Dank für's Aufpassen und Korrigieren. Wünsche einen wunderbaren Sonntag :-) commented 2026-09-20 05:43:57 UTC by free_as_a_bird ♦14 |
| 189254264 (Comments: 1) | Lyon-St-Clair (Discussed changesets: 107) | Bonjour, J'avais fini de corriger les trous dans les relations route=bus et ordre des membres et voici une nouvelle série. Les membres "stop" doivent être placés avant le membre "platform" correspond... commented 2026-09-20 05:39:22 UTC by mga_geo ♦346 |
| 189166588 (Comments: 3) | m_ivannikov (Discussed changesets: 2) | Доброе утро! Спасибо, что поправили. Нет, не перепутал: кадастровый номер здания: 77:08:0006012:1208 он с 30.07.2020 стал именно 79А. На руках Е... commented 2026-09-20 05:38:15 UTC by m_ivannikov ♦2 |
| 189269954 (Comments: 1) | Molboen (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2026-09-20 05:37:30 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,927 |
| 132129637 (Comments: 2) | DeBigC (Discussed changesets: 57) | The gate has had periods when it is broken, but I think only residents of Carrington are issued with the passcode. commented 2026-09-20 05:33:27 UTC by DeBigC ♦117 |
| 187610549 (Comments: 2) | kguenther24 (Discussed changesets: 28) | The Esri and Mapbox imagery show the pavilion and some paths under construction, as well as referencing the public diagrams of the park. There are definitely still some missing paths and details though that are harder to map without newer imagery. commented 2026-09-20 05:01:08 UTC by kguenther24 ♦26 |
| 189241972 (Comments: 1) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 211) | Bitte boundary Fehler beheben. Siehe hier: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.43252&lat=48.94788&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Cways Danke commented 2026-09-20 04:42:24 UTC by WoSoe ♦127 |
| 189279590 (Comments: 1) | thancharted (Discussed changesets: 1) | The ricefields are still incomplete. Might do another batch real soon. This may take a while without assistance. commented 2026-09-20 04:09:01 UTC by thancharted ♦1 |
| 189248075 (Comments: 1) | P Diddy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi P Diddy, Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. However, before you continue to map, please respond to the questions and and follow the feedback given to you on changeset 189084965 , namely to clearly explain your source(s) for the... commented 2026-09-20 02:49:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189191418 (Comments: 1) | DamienSmith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, we don't have a license for the imagery you've used. The URL you have used appears to be SISP imagery hosted by Southern Downs Regional Council. SISP imagery is only available commercially and we cannot use it in OSM. The QLD ... commented 2026-09-20 02:39:25 UTC by Joel Koen ♦87 |
| 189250127 (Comments: 1) | KelvinJeffs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, we don't have a license for the imagery you've used. The URL you have used appears to be SISP imagery hosted by Southern Downs Regional Council. SISP imagery is only available commercially and we cannot use it in OSM. The QLD ... commented 2026-09-20 02:39:11 UTC by Joel Koen ♦87 |
| 188247428 (Comments: 1) | KK-Service (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo KK-Service, ich hatte bereits im Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188511611 etwas zur "area:highway" in der Betzenstraße geschrieben (vor 12 Tagen). Bisher habe ich dazu leider noch keine Rückmeldung... commented 2026-09-20 01:39:43 UTC by goodidea ♦158 |
| 189049976 (Comments: 2) | Savenije (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi! Allereerst welkom op OpenStreetMap. Het veld "defibrillator:location" is bedoeld voor een specifieke locatie van een AED, zoals "links naast de voordeur", "aan de schutting", "onder de carport nummer 16&... commented 2026-09-20 01:38:53 UTC by jxpsert ♦92 |
| 189273625 (Comments: 2) | Skinine (Discussed changesets: 8) | Olá, Skinine! O endereço do POI deve estar com os mesmos dados da rua. Favor verificar, por exemplo, a Mercearia JP (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14197615751 Abraço! --- ... commented 2026-09-20 00:58:26 UTC by adrianojbr ♦594 |
| 189274566 (Comments: 1) | Marcos Vinicius Ertel (Discussed changesets: 5) | Olá, Marcos. Recomenda-se enviar nomes totalmente em maiúsculas e genéricos (se não tem nome próprio, pode deixar em branco mesmo). Abraço! --- Publ... commented 2026-09-20 00:56:11 UTC by adrianojbr ♦594 |
| 189276425 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 71) | the portion of markham from roosevelt to wood is going to be redone and paved according the county transit website commented 2026-09-20 00:22:38 UTC by ieguy3 ♦72 |
| 167366018 (Comments: 1) | Luiiisbaker (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12897870413/history has building:levels = 4;2;1;3 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-20 00:18:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |