Latest OSM Changeset Discussions | 7 days | Amount: 1802
Filter for Country selection:
(Not displayed: woodpeck_repair,Nakaner-repair,SomeoneElse_Revert,Peda_repair,Stereo_repair,ToeBeeFixit,mavl) See all discussions
Country Changeset Contributor Comment
173698139
(Comments: 4)
eerib
(Discussed changesets: 59)
Something to note is that reservation is required to access and reservations are very limited. There are two types of reservations available: parking spot and a shuttle bus spot.

Other access modes haven't been addressed by Metro Vancouve...
commented 2025-10-31 07:10:51 UTC by eerib ♦207
173974081
(Comments: 1)
kingkingHK
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Please split these changesets. This is difficult to discuss.
1. Lung Yuet Rd `=primary` is considered for connecting Cornwall St, not Nam Cheong St
2. When a road ends at roundabouts, the `=roundabout` currently doesn't use its classifi...
commented 2025-10-31 06:56:57 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629
173944054
(Comments: 2)
Ozon OSM12
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Здравствуйте. Ошиблась. Спасибо, поправила
commented 2025-10-31 06:53:56 UTC by Ozon OSM12 ♦1
173995352
(Comments: 3)
Davit125
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Vdaka za promptnu opravu 👍
commented 2025-10-31 06:48:40 UTC by t_ja ♦217
174005868
(Comments: 1)
b-jazz
(Discussed changesets: 86)
Oops, reused wrong changeset description. This was a revert on a bad change that violated basic golf course etiquette (fairways crossing over greens)
commented 2025-10-31 06:44:50 UTC by b-jazz ♦745
173682971
(Comments: 1)
Pèlerin Gris
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour, attention ce chemin est une voie verte d'après https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4986535 , vous l'avez ajouté comme une piste cyclable. Le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle détaille comment t...
commented 2025-10-31 06:37:13 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦216
173970158
(Comments: 1)
dotremo
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Für zwei verschiedene POIs müssten es auch zwei verschiedene Unternehmen sein. Auch wenn sie 4 Autos im Kundenauftrag verkaufen laut Webseite, ist es wohl in erster Linie eine Autowerkstatt.
Falls doch in erster Linie Autohandel, dann ka...
commented 2025-10-31 06:31:18 UTC by Bienson ♦351
173880244
(Comments: 1)
CfrBst
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour, attention vous avez glissé sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036659113#map=17/49.406076/1.169132&layers=N
commented 2025-10-31 06:30:01 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦216
174000473
(Comments: 1)
p7890
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hello, is
civil=yes
a duplicate of
usage=public
?
commented 2025-10-31 06:27:07 UTC by aTarom ♦824
173994608
(Comments: 1)
Bodensee-Rudi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi Rudi,

könnte es sein, dass der Poller momentan bloss entfernt wurde aber jederzeit wieder installiert werden könnte?

Ciao
Rene
commented 2025-10-31 06:23:46 UTC by rene78 ♦457
173969585
(Comments: 1)
dotremo
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Hallo,

Existiert das Ladenlokal noch? Dann als disused:shop=books stehen lassen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:*

Wenn nicht, dann auch den gesamten Node löschen und nicht als Adressenduplikat stehen lass...
commented 2025-10-31 06:19:22 UTC by Bienson ♦351
173994886
(Comments: 2)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
Na upartego zrzut ekranu wrzucasz na jakąś stronę a tu odnośnik.
To może być np. https://postimages.org/ lub dysk wirtualny Google czy inny tylko wtedy trzeba udostępnić plik i wygenerować odnośnik.
commented 2025-10-31 06:18:52 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦551
173921684
(Comments: 1)
Stela_B
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

Could I ask what this shape represents? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445959477

VictorIE
commented 2025-10-31 06:02:36 UTC by VictorIE ♦952
173872766
(Comments: 2)
Pooh01
(Discussed changesets: 23)
Tam gdzie trwa budowa, tam jest pozostawione construction. Tam gdzie jest ukończone i stoją barierki, żeby nie jeździć jest access=no. Rondo na północy też jest formmalnie w budowie (i znajduje sie na landuse=construction), a puszczony ...
commented 2025-10-31 06:00:56 UTC by Pooh01 ♦22
173999825
(Comments: 1)
makar987654
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This changeset shows a similar pattern to previous vandalism affecting the same elements, involving changes to the highway tag. Those earlier edits were reverted.

I would appreciate it if other members of the community could review this change...
commented 2025-10-31 05:56:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173924140
(Comments: 1)
Lockstar
(Discussed changesets: 65)
Hi,
Some issues in this area some from this changeset.
In OSMInspector relation 5948947 (residential) the outer way is broken.
The one member relation (residential) doe not have the backyards going to the water front, yet the DCS Base Map ...
commented 2025-10-31 05:51:43 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,679
X173986225
(Comments: 1)
ery_washere
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello ery_washere, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locati...
commented 2025-10-31 05:08:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
127996117
(Comments: 5)
radiotrefoil
(Discussed changesets: 54)
actually I'll wait a little to see if they respond to your message
commented 2025-10-31 05:05:46 UTC by radiotrefoil ♦115
170697210
(Comments: 1)
Rwhi13
(Discussed changesets: 1)
hi I see you've removed the Aboriginal site tags, I raised this with the original mapper at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127996117 if the site is private property and public access is restricted then it's good to add the access=p...
commented 2025-10-31 04:35:52 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
169750137
(Comments: 1)
MilkTeaaa
(Discussed changesets: 3)
HI,
The relation 19410911 (building=train_station) does not from continuous outer way. In fact the existing members have no other use? would suggest that the building could be represented by a single simple way?

-------- Note
The tag id...
commented 2025-10-31 04:16:17 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,679
173956663
(Comments: 2)
RahilPasha
(Discussed changesets: 6)
"Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected walkway and driveway nodes . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well.
commented 2025-10-31 04:08:24 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5
22746295
(Comments: 1)
rayquaza
(Discussed changesets: 33)
Is way 286359687 really there? I could not verify with actual imagery.
commented 2025-10-31 04:03:58 UTC by jeffmeyer ♦4
173655601
(Comments: 2)
RahilPasha
(Discussed changesets: 6)
"Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected walkway and driveway nodes . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well.
Thank you"
commented 2025-10-31 04:03:11 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5
173865854
(Comments: 2)
RahilPasha
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected driveway to the main road. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
commented 2025-10-31 03:56:02 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5
173869216
(Comments: 2)
RahilPasha
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected driveway to the main road. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
commented 2025-10-31 03:50:33 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5
170907501
(Comments: 1)
doogs
(Discussed changesets: 2)
motor_vehicle=designated implies that the public can drive their cars here? Is that the case here? If it's only for management, maintenance and emergency vehicles then motor_vehicle=private should be used.
commented 2025-10-31 03:50:08 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
170907336
(Comments: 2)
doogs
(Discussed changesets: 2)
ah sorry I see you've done that now.
commented 2025-10-31 03:49:05 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
170867126
(Comments: 1)
Broadstaar
(Discussed changesets: 2)
some of these still had proposed:highway=*, this should be removed if the road is already constructed now, or if construction is underway then changed to construction:highway=*.
commented 2025-10-31 03:48:14 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173953520
(Comments: 2)
RahilPasha
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-31 03:43:50 UTC by RahilPasha ♦5
170559912
(Comments: 1)
martinwisata
(Discussed changesets: 1)
It's best to add access=private + ownership=private.

This is more than just a single parking spot for a residence, it's a few marked spots for a community centre, so while private is still useful to me mapped.

Having it mapped...
commented 2025-10-31 03:10:18 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173928219
(Comments: 2)
achauhan_Lyft
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Changeset: 173928219
Date: 30/10/25
Task
Comment from silversurfer83 about 13 hours ago
Hi there :)
shouldn't this be a conditional access like
access:conditional=no @ delivery
cheers
---
Published using OSMCha: https...
commented 2025-10-31 03:01:33 UTC by achauhan_Lyft ♦2
170547524
(Comments: 1)
Stirling Land Development
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Driveways are likely considered acceptable to be mapped, so they should not be deleted if already mapped by others unless they have been demolished. Others may find these useful data.

They are visible to the public from the street and visible ...
commented 2025-10-31 03:00:20 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173957725
(Comments: 1)
Mikewalker25
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, you've accidentally dragged a node that's part of a multipolygon onto Ocean Road, I've fixed this up for you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001668
---

Published using OSM...
commented 2025-10-31 02:56:16 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
173297770
(Comments: 3)
deusjz
(Discussed changesets: 2)
It is. Painted bike lanes that are part of the roadway are always mapped using the `cycleway=lane` tag on the road itself. Separated or protected bike lanes that run alongside a road can either be mapped as a separate `highway=cycleway` or as a `cycl...
commented 2025-10-31 02:45:34 UTC by pesticides ♦29
170414006
(Comments: 3)
leonardjos
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thanks, I can see in that document it's referring both to "Chatswood North" as the name of a "Local Area Traffic Management (LATM)" which I probably wouldn't think as warranting a place=neighbourhood but also as the &quo...
commented 2025-10-31 02:31:41 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173934690
(Comments: 2)
fuling09260524
(Discussed changesets: 3)
那这种小区内部道路怎么和社会道路区分?
commented 2025-10-31 02:26:34 UTC by fuling09260524 ♦3
173976326
(Comments: 2)
@Muneebafzal
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Revert incorrect fixes done as part of a MapRoulette challenge

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001213
commented 2025-10-31 02:20:57 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
173976061
(Comments: 2)
@Muneebafzal
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Revert incorrect fixes done as part of a MapRoulette challenge

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001213
commented 2025-10-31 02:20:56 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
173975606
(Comments: 1)
@Muneebafzal
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hi, the parking area in this changeset needs to be drawn correctly, you've left it mis-shapen.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173975606

commented 2025-10-31 02:20:00 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
173976219
(Comments: 1)
@Muneebafzal
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hi, these buildings would likely still be intersecting as they are still overlapping. The Priceline probably needs to be changed to not be tagged as a standalone building, either with indoor mapping tags or by removing the building tag.
...
commented 2025-10-31 02:18:00 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
173988680
(Comments: 1)
kdpy
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna....
commented 2025-10-31 01:52:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173991920
(Comments: 1)
mark2525
(Discussed changesets: 99)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270994237
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
commented 2025-10-31 01:52:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173978240
(Comments: 1)
Geometra_PL
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj...
commented 2025-10-31 01:44:21 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173969675
(Comments: 1)
Luizka15154
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', &#...
commented 2025-10-31 01:44:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173966308
(Comments: 1)
Mac76
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna....
commented 2025-10-31 01:44:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173973449
(Comments: 1)
Luizka15154
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna....
commented 2025-10-31 01:44:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173969286
(Comments: 1)
theDM
(Discussed changesets: 125)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375548012

Pozdrawiam! ...
commented 2025-10-31 01:44:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173975612
(Comments: 6)
To The Moon Kraków
(Discussed changesets: 1)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-31 01:44:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173974500
(Comments: 2)
Kantor kryptowalut Poznań - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon
(Discussed changesets: 1)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-31 01:44:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173969580
(Comments: 1)
Luizka15154
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place...
commented 2025-10-31 01:43:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173969612
(Comments: 1)
Luizka15154
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place...
commented 2025-10-31 01:43:45 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173969686
(Comments: 1)
Luizka15154
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place...
commented 2025-10-31 01:43:41 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
171730904
(Comments: 1)
the Sandinator
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hello,

You identifed buildings in imagery, and I can understand why you merged the nodes of these building footprints, however this tends to make them more difficult to modify later. You can hold alt to prevent the snapping of nodes. Check out...
commented 2025-10-31 01:35:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
174000565
(Comments: 3)
San Blas Islands
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Servicios turísticos de las islas San Blas Panamá"
---
(Auto-translation)
commented 2025-10-31 01:27:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173962549
(Comments: 2)
ZLima12
(Discussed changesets: 32)
Hi,

Even if the trail was created "illegally and in secret", it should not be removed from the map. Legality only might affect the access value. That being said, this trail is on public land, so I'm not sure that `access=private...
commented 2025-10-31 00:04:47 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276
173999208
(Comments: 2)
thanos98
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hier is een voorbeeld van een opmerking op basis van je kaartbewerkingen: "Fietsbarrières toegevoegd"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added cycle barriers"
commented 2025-10-30 23:56:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173922391
(Comments: 6)
Yunkers
(Discussed changesets: 101)
Ja pamiętam, że ten odcinek był jako trunk, a powodem mają być ostre łącznice na połączeniu A4 i S19. Podnosząc do trunk, sugerowałem się S19, która omija Rzeszów od zachodu i tym samym omija się DK idące przez miasto.
...
commented 2025-10-30 23:46:48 UTC by theDM ♦142
173997900
(Comments: 1)
wordbird
(Discussed changesets: 9)
yay 173997900
commented 2025-10-30 22:44:39 UTC by likeToTravel ♦6
173963861
(Comments: 1)
haritaduzenleme1234
(Discussed changesets: 1)
@eftal erdoğan(user id:23452030). Bazı değişiklikleriniz vandalizm amaçlı. Bir binaya(way/865847491) "İZMİR KEHANESİ VUR VUR MALA GELSİN İMANA" adını, bir yola(way/1446230182) "SHEVCENKO KAVŞAĞI" adını, bir ...
commented 2025-10-30 22:20:04 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
165051957
(Comments: 1)
aandreoy
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Seems to be incorrect
commented 2025-10-30 22:15:33 UTC by Layft Greater ♦177
173963432
(Comments: 1)
JFinnane
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi,
You've mixed up the tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227934 should be tagged as riding centre (leisure=horse_riding) and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227924 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227919 sho...
commented 2025-10-30 22:14:15 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦835
173997079
(Comments: 4)
BIG-HIT
(Discussed changesets: 1)
OK
commented 2025-10-30 22:12:31 UTC by BIG-HIT ♦1
171826150
(Comments: 1)
Elemnia
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo Elemnia,
bist du dir wirklich sicher, dass der keine Trampelpfad nicht mehr dort ist? Ich war das letzte Mal vor gut einem Jahr dort, und damals war er erkenn- und begehbar. Man musste allerdings hier und da schauen, wo genau er ist, da ...
commented 2025-10-30 22:12:11 UTC by NGL-engel ♦106
168923535
(Comments: 1)
Gingko
(Discussed changesets: 1)
sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6437112085, la station présente maintenant des emplacements supplémentaires le long du trottoir opposé (Nord), voulez-vous les représentez explicitement ?
commented 2025-10-30 22:02:49 UTC by Britzz ♦241
173985219
(Comments: 12)
yticaa
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Thanks
commented 2025-10-30 21:42:15 UTC by yticaa ♦10
158082227
(Comments: 1)
slymarekivan
(Discussed changesets: 35)
Zdravim, bohuzial, stale nespravne presuvate budovy. Sice pisete, ze podla Ortofoto, ktora uz je tu celkom dobra, ale nesedi to. Budova ma byt v OSM umiestnena podla podorysu, tam kde sa dotyka zeme. Nie tam kde sa premieta jej strecha podla sikmeho ...
commented 2025-10-30 21:34:08 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699
168152252
(Comments: 1)
Spille00
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Ahoi, auf welcher Grundlage "vor Ort" hast du diesen Weg als abandoned:highway= gesetzt?

Schließlich ist er Grundlage für mehrere Wanderwege, die nur über öffentlich gewidmete Wege/Straßen laufen dürfe...
commented 2025-10-30 21:17:55 UTC by DeFra85 ♦260
171594353
(Comments: 3)
Karsten Natebus
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Danke dir! Ich war gestern dort und mir ist da auch kein Wegweiser aufgefallen. Interessant ist nun die Iteration#4 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2454198959/history/4
Soweit kein „historisches Interesse“ am Erhalt besteht, kö...
commented 2025-10-30 21:13:13 UTC by geow ♦451
161536180
(Comments: 3)
noahdoersing
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Coolio danke dir fürs fixen :)
commented 2025-10-30 21:07:57 UTC by dadavid ♦510
173995544
(Comments: 1)
OrchidA
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary
commented 2025-10-30 21:04:59 UTC by OrchidA ♦4
173908030
(Comments: 2)
DippetyDoodah
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173995517
commented 2025-10-30 21:03:02 UTC by ion_chi ♦35
170090078
(Comments: 1)
Damian9S
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Coś nie tak jest z nazwą. Poza tym to raczej opis, a nie nazwa własna. I czy naprawdę można to nazwać 'atrakcją turystyczną'?
commented 2025-10-30 21:01:00 UTC by uprkos ♦59
173901316
(Comments: 2)
Loye Young
(Discussed changesets: 1)
There is no building called Victory Commons. Rather, "Victory Commons" is the area around the garage, the American Airlines Center, and the two Victory Plazas.

The entire structure marked with a P (which seems to be also labeled &quo...
commented 2025-10-30 20:55:15 UTC by Loye Young ♦1
173982293
(Comments: 2)
yticaa
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Pardon. Ik zal erop letten.
commented 2025-10-30 20:49:46 UTC by yticaa ♦10
173992157
(Comments: 3)
Nick24_
(Discussed changesets: 2)
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/272-2023-%D1%80#Text
commented 2025-10-30 20:47:44 UTC by Nick24_ ♦2
173986990
(Comments: 2)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
Rozumiem, że pojecie szczytu góry jest Ci obce. Tu nie ma góry, nie ma też szczytu.
A w OSM nie zaznaczamy wysokości terenu poza specjalnymi przypadkami. bo do tego jest osobna mapa - poziomicowa.
Nie przenosimy też bezrozumni...
commented 2025-10-30 20:38:45 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,313
173994688
(Comments: 1)
ProvenExplorer
(Discussed changesets: 1)
I added the bottle return machine earlier on the edge of the supermarket. Since I saw a few times, that the bottle return machine is placed inside in other supermarkets, I wanted to make sure I did it right :)
commented 2025-10-30 20:34:58 UTC by ProvenExplorer ♦1
173162953
(Comments: 1)
Turazo
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Szia!

A Sarokút ki van táblázva, vagy honnan a név?

Tamás
commented 2025-10-30 20:31:23 UTC by vasony ♦533
173923071
(Comments: 1)
MichaelFS
(Discussed changesets: 49)
Fast. Ich hab eine 1 vergessen, du hast nun nebst der 1 eine extra 4 hinzugefügt ;) Irgendwann treffen wirs.
commented 2025-10-30 20:28:55 UTC by datendelphin ♦332
173979074
(Comments: 2)
CoreForce
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Auf dem Ortsschild steht nur Röthenbach. Dies ist die offizielle der "Gemeinde Röthenbach".

Ich denke, es wäre für die Nutzer hilfreich, wenn sie von der Karte auf die Realität schliessen können.

...
commented 2025-10-30 20:20:03 UTC by CoreForce ♦3
173946873
(Comments: 4)
raf57575757
(Discussed changesets: 5)
staw zginął leśniczą śmiercią tragiczną xD

commented 2025-10-30 20:15:45 UTC by Yog Sot ♦327
173992083
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
It’s a pity that you are not responding to the comments here or to the private messages.
commented 2025-10-30 20:15:27 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173900489
(Comments: 5)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
Mimo wszytsko pozdrawiam i życzę miłych edycji. Nie zamierzam przeglądać twoich edycji i wchodzić ci w drogę
commented 2025-10-30 20:13:19 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225
173993313
(Comments: 1)
Emerson Palhares
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Dear Emerson,
I've reviewed your changeset and this change to service doesn't seem to be right, can you please explain to me why you've changed it?
It doesn't seem right especially because service is usually used for access ...
commented 2025-10-30 20:09:44 UTC by giopera ♦6
173983206
(Comments: 2)
keesm
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Mooi Dick, ik zag wel iets van een wandelrelatie op een zijstuk, maar kwam er niet helemaal uit. Zal het nog eens analyseren.
Bedankt
Gr
Kees
commented 2025-10-30 20:09:42 UTC by keesm ♦5
173993229
(Comments: 1)
roelg
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Het vlak van de parkeerplaats heb ik uitgebreid.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community



commented 2025-10-30 20:08:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173818613
(Comments: 7)
Kyaw Gyi 992
(Discussed changesets: 1)
A building needs to have a tag describing it is a building.

There shouldn't be any tags like "are_in_me" or coordinates like in your changeset.
I also noticed that the alignment of buildings is very bad - buildings overlap in...
commented 2025-10-30 20:07:13 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
173742757
(Comments: 1)
Nicola Delfino
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Anche questo è un duplicato, lo cancello ora,

saluti
Martin
commented 2025-10-30 20:06:54 UTC by dieterdreist ♦870
173992029
(Comments: 1)
DA026
(Discussed changesets: 14)
DA

Waarom zouden hier geen brommers doorheen mogen?
Ik heb die tags verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-30 20:02:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173993092
(Comments: 1)
Waldamsel
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Hi!
Your changeset has been flagged for Outdated tags, please review the tags you've changed and check if everyone of them is correct.

Best Regards,
giopera
---

Published using OSMCha: h...
commented 2025-10-30 20:00:34 UTC by giopera ♦6
173788815
(Comments: 2)
Virgile1994
(Discussed changesets: 34)
Salut,
La route est signalée par un panneau C107, ce qui se traduit habitellement par highway=trunk dans OSM.
commented 2025-10-30 19:59:28 UTC by Virgile1994 ♦41
173991828
(Comments: 1)
DA026
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Dag DA Wat is je bron in deze?

Sinds wanneer mogen hier auto's doorheen?
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.95952,5.846204,20/?datastrip=20250620_SVNEO-01
Graag reactie,

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-30 19:58:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173992954
(Comments: 1)
Ozon OSM16
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Hi! I warn you that you have the Request Review checkbox active, this asks us to review your edits, but it seems you don't need it and I believe it's an error.

Best Regards,
giopera
---

...
commented 2025-10-30 19:55:04 UTC by giopera ♦6
173992538
(Comments: 2)
Ezra Edwards
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Just for contest it has been flagged as a possible import and I'd like to clarify if it's this the case or it's just a false positive.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes...
commented 2025-10-30 19:50:50 UTC by giopera ♦6
173943117
(Comments: 4)
Manuel H
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Danke.

1. nach Luftbild korrigiert
2. nach Regionalstadtplan Kassel eingepflegt und fixme mit Bitte um Kontrolle
3. fixme mit Bitte um Kontrolle
commented 2025-10-30 19:50:32 UTC by Manuel H ♦55
173942427
(Comments: 3)
oo-O-oo
(Discussed changesets: 2)
If mistakes are obvious, I am happy to correct them. But your expectations are rather questionable! Of course, I can also delete such things as copy & paste errors if you don't want to be bothered with your mistakes.
commented 2025-10-30 19:38:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173975645
(Comments: 2)
mechka
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Благодаря за коментара! Сега разбирам какво да направя и ще променя таговете, вместо да изтривам точката.
commented 2025-10-30 19:38:15 UTC by mechka ♦1
173650345
(Comments: 2)
Jons Icoli
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi,

Will do when it's night time. IIRC there's some lamps there that don't put out enough light to see obstacles or dangers. I haven't been able to do the whole region yet tho
commented 2025-10-30 19:37:09 UTC by Jons Icoli ♦2
173991856
(Comments: 1)
علي طهراوي
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi,
Sorry for the contact but I've noticed that you're adding large areas of water on what appears to be a small river, can you explain to me the idea behind it and why you're adding such large areas?

Also note that roads can...
commented 2025-10-30 19:34:38 UTC by giopera ♦6
173908097
(Comments: 1)
Iris 314
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1445898980. What is the mean of the tag "Plaza con sombra y juegos, pública- (CEMENTERIO VIEJO)" = "Malvinas Argentinas"? Did you overpaint a existing leisure=p...
commented 2025-10-30 19:30:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
149331125
(Comments: 2)
Apirnus
(Discussed changesets: 27)
Seal küll foore pole
commented 2025-10-30 19:29:16 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦17
140095659
(Comments: 3)
SafetyIng
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Das ist leider so nicht richtig...beachte den Abschnitt Ortschaften und die daraus resultierenden Grenzen, welche hier gemappt sind...auch wenn im ersten Abschnitt von Ortsteil gesprochen wird, ist dieser dennoch Teil der Ortschaft Paplitz...eine Bes...
commented 2025-10-30 19:27:49 UTC by bwbuz ♦51
173942114
(Comments: 1)
sskwarek
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Witaj. Pokazuję ci znacznie lepszą praktykę mapowania. Która zachowuje w pełni historię obiektów już nie istniejących. demolished:building = Yes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446362194. Nawet gdy w miejscu dawnej wieży zo...
commented 2025-10-30 19:26:25 UTC by km2bp ♦287
173643154
(Comments: 1)
Gino-52
(Discussed changesets: 27)
Guten Abend!
Ich nerve schon wieder mit meinen dummern Fragen...
Wenn die Friedrich-Ebert-Straße in Langendiebach jetzt eine Einbahnstraße ist, dann muß sich der Weg von MKK-39 geändert haben.
Kannst Du da mal nachfors...
commented 2025-10-30 19:24:21 UTC by Senihtu ♦100
173951519
(Comments: 2)
kabelhaai
(Discussed changesets: 25)
ok, aangepast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446155491
commented 2025-10-30 19:22:39 UTC by kabelhaai ♦55
173977044
(Comments: 1)
dododont
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Moi,

Mielenkiintoinen kyltti maanomistajalta. Moottoriajoneuvoilla ajo maastossa on nyt on lähtökohtaisesti kielletty ilman kylttiäkin, joten tämä varmaan koskee lähinnä pyöräilyä.

Py&ou...
commented 2025-10-30 19:21:02 UTC by Sakari_N ♦85
173987164
(Comments: 1)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
Przecież w JOSMIe wzgórze i szczyt mają ten sam preset, ten sam tag. Teraz żadne wzgórze się nie będzie renderować. Powiedz mi, dla kogo są mapy? Dla ludzi, którzy chcą ich używać w celach turystycznych, rekreacyjnych i...
commented 2025-10-30 19:09:26 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225
173991618
(Comments: 1)
Flap Slimy Outward
(Discussed changesets: 91)
If there is, in fact, a sign indicating its name, I couldn't find it, and it's definitely not along the main highway. Is it buried on some random intersection hidden from Street View?
commented 2025-10-30 19:06:34 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦118
173990711
(Comments: 1)
mapyr
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Wellicht green?
Loop je edits nog even af svp.
MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-30 19:05:33 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173618046
(Comments: 2)
Püppi68
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo,
ich möchte noch einmal an die Überarbeitung erinnern.
Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-30 19:05:24 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173659700
(Comments: 2)
azerim
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Hallo,
ich möchte noch einmal an die Überarbeitung erinnern.
Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-30 19:04:50 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173990803
(Comments: 1)
mapyr
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Tip colour=Groen is geen valide tag. De taal is UK English
green?

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-30 19:04:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173990071
(Comments: 1)
mapyr
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Lijkt me oke.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community



commented 2025-10-30 19:02:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173989763
(Comments: 1)
Gopher22
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Probeer als het kan bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
M...
commented 2025-10-30 18:59:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173976291
(Comments: 3)
eleguaia
(Discussed changesets: 1)
No, i dati di Openstreetmap non sono collegati a Google e a Facebook/Instagram
commented 2025-10-30 18:56:14 UTC by fayor ♦126
173962992
(Comments: 1)
Feuerwehr Wald
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo,

auch hier noch einmal der Hinweis auf den korrekten Umgang mit emergency=water_tank.
Am Beispiel www.openstreetmap.org/node/13269755116: Das sieht für mich wie ein Teich aus. Dann ist das Tagging aber falsch.
Worum handelt es...
commented 2025-10-30 18:53:05 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173644610
(Comments: 1)
stillhart
(Discussed changesets: 37)
lmfao imagine
commented 2025-10-30 18:47:52 UTC by naUrnaTc ♦1
161863939
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 18:47:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173947412
(Comments: 1)
Horus9999
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo,

die Adressen 7a und 7b unterscheiden sich im Grundsatz nicht.
Die Nr. 7b wurde aber erst am 12.08. korrigiert. Mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit verwendet der Anbieter diese Daten noch nicht.

Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-30 18:45:04 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173973237
(Comments: 1)
Guardian Protection
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm....
commented 2025-10-30 18:40:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
172614237
(Comments: 2)
Javierpf
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Hola VL, gracias por comentar. Generalmente suelo dibujar los cambios cuando están confirmados. Esta obra la están arrancando y no sabemos cuándo estará completada. Cuando eso pase, o esté cerca, ahí yo suelo...
commented 2025-10-30 18:40:38 UTC by Javierpf ♦107
173985027
(Comments: 3)
Dmitriy19801980
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Отлично! Я пока удалил natural=coastline. Вкратце, он предназначен для материк - море/океан.
commented 2025-10-30 18:39:59 UTC by vng_me ♦129
173978619
(Comments: 2)
kubahahaha
(Discussed changesets: 213)
Faktycznie, nie wiem jak mogłem się tak pomylić.
Wycofane
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173990201
commented 2025-10-30 18:27:01 UTC by kubahahaha ♦403
162949032
(Comments: 1)
Lulu-Ann
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Das war eher für den Ortsname gemeint, nicht für einen Adresspunkt? Ich korrigiere das jetzt.
commented 2025-10-30 18:24:31 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦402
173982642
(Comments: 2)
yticaa
(Discussed changesets: 10)
access=no betekent gewoon Verboden Toegang voor iedereen....
Ik heb die tag verwijderd
commented 2025-10-30 18:19:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173989123
(Comments: 1)
SarahAr
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.o...
commented 2025-10-30 18:14:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173969166
(Comments: 1)
thetornado76
(Discussed changesets: 150)
Was meinst du mit maxspeed=none und maxpeed:type=sign?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173969166

commented 2025-10-30 18:13:59 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413
173984090
(Comments: 3)
Clitheroe Warrior
(Discussed changesets: 7)
No problem, I've already fixed.
commented 2025-10-30 18:05:32 UTC by vng_me ♦129
161906919
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 18:05:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173920673
(Comments: 3)
Der_Fab
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo,

das hast du dir ein schwieriges Thema gesucht.
Ich hatte schon nach Mapillary-Bildern geschaut, war dort aber nicht erfolgreich.
Nur ein paar ergänzende Hinweise:
- M.E. benötigt auch der mini_roundabout eine Beschild...
commented 2025-10-30 18:02:23 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
170877455
(Comments: 2)
_Mathieu_
(Discussed changesets: 60)
Hello urk,
I'd say this tag combination is used when a traffic sign explicitely bans cycling on a particular path (which was the case there iirc).
commented 2025-10-30 17:59:23 UTC by _Mathieu_ ♦44
173920381
(Comments: 2)
fredlenoir
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Hi, it s a mistake (tracktype : grade2). I ve changer the tag.
commented 2025-10-30 17:57:21 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15
173988198
(Comments: 2)
bxl-forever
(Discussed changesets: 157)
The official name of this stop is "Alma".
This is the correct spelling, and this is how it should be written on OSM.

You changed the name of the stop and changed it into "STIB / MVIB - Alma", which is a strange mix of th...
commented 2025-10-30 17:53:51 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
99354832
(Comments: 3)
reedyn
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Well, I'll double check my photos from the walk and will probably move the stream more or less parallel south from thw way.
commented 2025-10-30 17:52:34 UTC by urk ♦20
162127341
(Comments: 2)
damianeue
(Discussed changesets: 144)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18650770 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18650771 sono divieti completamente inesistenti, si tratta di manovre consentite da segnaletica verticale e orizzontale
commented 2025-10-30 17:49:38 UTC by totera ♦305
173972976
(Comments: 2)
Dacha2
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Официальное название "улица Фрунзе". Как будет на украинском языке я не знаю, поэтому оставил как было.
commented 2025-10-30 17:49:37 UTC by Dacha2 ♦1
173988608
(Comments: 2)
Yukiroshi
(Discussed changesets: 18)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4724908
commented 2025-10-30 17:43:24 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦24
173980218
(Comments: 1)
The Golf Club CNX
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/...
commented 2025-10-30 17:35:19 UTC by Comino ♦202
148039178
(Comments: 1)
Pooh01
(Discussed changesets: 23)
ta trasa równoległa do S19 dalej jest w planach czy pomysł zarzucono?
commented 2025-10-30 17:33:19 UTC by theDM ♦142
173987308
(Comments: 1)
Sim100v
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Please do not change the name of metro stations!
Your edit has been reverted.
commented 2025-10-30 17:32:19 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
173978283
(Comments: 1)
Kantor kryptowalut Bielsko Biała - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name t...
commented 2025-10-30 17:31:34 UTC by Comino ♦202
173972598
(Comments: 1)
Kantor kryptowalut Katowice - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name t...
commented 2025-10-30 17:31:11 UTC by Comino ♦202
173982798
(Comments: 1)
maro21
(Discussed changesets: 300)
Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name t...
commented 2025-10-30 17:30:55 UTC by Comino ♦202
173972394
(Comments: 1)
Kantor kryptowalut Łódź - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name t...
commented 2025-10-30 17:30:16 UTC by Comino ♦202
139123898
(Comments: 1)
Nordsee-Zeitung GmbH
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo "Nordsee-Zeitung GmbH",
dieser Fußweg auf dem Gartenweg existiert nicht, nur der private Teil hinter der Hecke. Magst du das ändern?
commented 2025-10-30 17:26:14 UTC by urk ♦20
173987731
(Comments: 2)
Inscope Property Inspections
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Property inspection service in Melbourne"
commented 2025-10-30 17:24:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173973581
(Comments: 6)
mueschel
(Discussed changesets: 890)
Ed_slv,
"What about if I use as source "personal knowledge" ?"

Um dos princípios do OSM é a verificabilidade da informação. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Algo como &...
commented 2025-10-30 17:17:26 UTC by JoaoPaixao ♦15
173987155
(Comments: 2)
AlxTheMap
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings, including schools, fences, walls, a leisure pitch, and cricket nets"
commented 2025-10-30 17:16:56 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
134837986
(Comments: 8)
Mateusz Konieczny
(Discussed changesets: 551)
Sorry yeah this my original mapping.

I agree it's not ideal. I think I would resort to that tag just if I can't decide on a more specific category, and the stuff they sell is all overpriced luxury nonsense.

Some of these prob...
commented 2025-10-30 17:16:42 UTC by Harry Wood ♦102
163544959
(Comments: 3)
pavvv
(Discussed changesets: 158)
Jemu chyba chodziło z tym zniszczeniem, że te tory nie łączą z czynnymi torami i rosną między nimi drzewa.
W wielu miejscach we Wrocławiu są takie pozostawione stare tory i nikt ich nie demontuje (ani co dziwne nie kradnie).
Te nadal s...
commented 2025-10-30 17:14:17 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,313
173405683
(Comments: 6)
fmc_3
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Ich hab den mal so verlegt, wie ich es machen würde... Dann auch aus Sichweise als Radfahrer... Da ist eine Verkehrsinsel, wenn ich da mit dem Rad langfahren würde, würde ich stets über die Verkehrsinsel fahren, egal, ob ich in Ri...
commented 2025-10-30 17:09:34 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,090
173735746
(Comments: 1)
Spencer_MHD
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hey, thanks for this changeset! The only thing is that the change from grassland to farmland near the southshore may be what the aerial photos show, but I don't think it's current use. The area is currently an empty field and planned for fu...
commented 2025-10-30 17:07:37 UTC by HoubkneghteS ♦2
172059593
(Comments: 1)
NVBW_Edit_Nakaner
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi!

In this changeset you added the tag landing=0.14 to way 303780041. Did you perhaps mean landing=yes or another value?

Cheers
commented 2025-10-30 17:06:53 UTC by spughetti ♦116
173496751
(Comments: 1)
Fabianbuecheler
(Discussed changesets: 54)
Hallo Fabian,

Layer ist für die Ebenen, wenn mehrere OSM-Dinge übereinander gezeichnet sind. Damit ist nicht Stockwerke gemeint. Das gehört in Stockwerke (building:levels).

Ich habe noch ein paar Sachen zusätzlich ei...
commented 2025-10-30 17:06:16 UTC by Metzor ♦388
173977894
(Comments: 2)
Isopycnic
(Discussed changesets: 14)
I was doing some cleanup and added some abandoned rail using usgs 3d elevation program data and compared it to esri data.
commented 2025-10-30 17:03:44 UTC by Isopycnic ♦8
168254609
(Comments: 1)
nikdavid
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello
Phil from the Data Working Group here.
We have received from some mappers who are concerned by the use of the Nerf Map Editor.
For the avoidance of doubt an editor which providing links to disallowed sources, in this case streetview, i...
commented 2025-10-30 16:59:26 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,402
162236275
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 16:58:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173931725
(Comments: 2)
Gertjan Idema
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Dank je. Op zich niet nieuw. Voor zo'n 1000 routes in Nederland stond de kleur er al in. Nu met 1000 extra aangevuld en voor 215 routes gecorrigeerd. Bij de overige routes staat er nog geen kleur in de bron data.
commented 2025-10-30 16:57:36 UTC by Gertjan Idema ♦18
162236693
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 16:55:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173971929
(Comments: 2)
voltairovicz
(Discussed changesets: 263)
Plac budowy nie był wyrysowany tymczasowo.
Przywróciłem.


commented 2025-10-30 16:53:40 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,313
170477723
(Comments: 5)
mapitero
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Well, Matheus, the video undoubtable shows the construction work going on (with 2 men working and 20 watching ;-) ) until 5 km ahead of Acopiara (which is not even proofed by GPS data). No rails yet and even when there is rails ontop the subgrade, th...
commented 2025-10-30 16:53:01 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦38
173873864
(Comments: 1)
Voirie_3M
(Discussed changesets: 12)
y'a pas une incohérence avec le débouché de l'avenue sur la rue Mirzakhani ?
commented 2025-10-30 16:52:00 UTC by Lyon-St-Clair ♦115
173979234
(Comments: 1)
LakeTana
(Discussed changesets: 6)
https://prensa.cba.gov.ar/gobernador/llaryora-habilito-el-segundo-tramo-de-la-duplicacion-de-la-avenida-padre-luchesse/
commented 2025-10-30 16:48:37 UTC by vicente lopez 2021 ♦36
173969042
(Comments: 3)
9ix
(Discussed changesets: 23)
Alles klar. Kann ich nachvollziehen.

commented 2025-10-30 16:48:05 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
162237032
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 16:46:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162237511
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 16:45:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173932354
(Comments: 1)
karc Egyesulet
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Tisztelt szerkesztő!
Kérem, hogy amennyiben épületeket kíván felrajzolni, akkor a rétegek közül válassza a FÖMI felvételeket, mert az alapértelmezett Bing műhold felv&ea...
commented 2025-10-30 16:42:22 UTC by Spush ♦41
162253757
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 16:41:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162256524
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 16:40:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162257059
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 16:40:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173946958
(Comments: 1)
theDM
(Discussed changesets: 125)
Dzięki :D
commented 2025-10-30 16:39:35 UTC by Szymson ♦421
162257303
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 16:38:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173985132
(Comments: 1)
Amin cafenet
(Discussed changesets: 1)
سرویس دهی همه ی خدمات در کمترین زمان ممکن

commented 2025-10-30 16:27:26 UTC by Amin cafenet ♦1
173985115
(Comments: 1)
Helmchen42
(Discussed changesets: 43)
Hydrogeography in north WY, US
commented 2025-10-30 16:26:21 UTC by Helmchen42 ♦24
173961818
(Comments: 1)
Glanz Digital Marketing
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Has the Victoria branch of Vagabond Wines at this location really closed and been replaced by your office?
commented 2025-10-30 16:25:23 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645
173947946
(Comments: 3)
jodjod
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thanks for the info! I changed bicyle and foot to no on the bridge.
commented 2025-10-30 16:23:50 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦619
173977694
(Comments: 1)
Isopycnic
(Discussed changesets: 14)
I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese...
commented 2025-10-30 16:23:23 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173979076
(Comments: 1)
Isopycnic
(Discussed changesets: 14)
I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes...
commented 2025-10-30 16:22:23 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173982054
(Comments: 1)
skumarchandela_lyft
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice.
---
...
commented 2025-10-30 16:20:43 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173981416
(Comments: 1)
Happy Dachshund
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946
commented 2025-10-30 16:19:30 UTC by Negreheb ♦296
173979123
(Comments: 1)
Happy Dachshund
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946
commented 2025-10-30 16:19:28 UTC by Negreheb ♦296
173979785
(Comments: 1)
Happy Dachshund
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946
commented 2025-10-30 16:19:27 UTC by Negreheb ♦296
173979714
(Comments: 1)
rkothiyal_lyft
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice.
---
...
commented 2025-10-30 16:18:44 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
168401714
(Comments: 2)
Duck_Dur
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello VictorIE,

No, this was apart of the old mill complex due for redevelopment. As you previously said, this was all demolished in 2023-25. There are bits of it still around and actively occupied like the Charity Shop and a car mechanics and...
commented 2025-10-30 16:15:35 UTC by Duck_Dur ♦2
173981273
(Comments: 1)
Gemirt
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Dag Gemirt.

Bedankt voor je bijdrage.

Gebruik svp de adresnode om op bij te taggen.
Geen spaties in postcode.
Ik pas even wat aan.

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-30 16:15:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173982537
(Comments: 1)
GamenHaaDee
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community




commented 2025-10-30 16:12:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173981362
(Comments: 1)
JHW1981
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-30 16:11:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173932774
(Comments: 4)
SafwatHalaby
(Discussed changesets: 77)
לא יודע, או שזה שביל או שלא. אם אתה לא רוצה שביל אז תשאיר ככה.
commented 2025-10-30 15:58:11 UTC by hatul ♦410
172757727
(Comments: 3)
dmfr
(Discussed changesets: 21)
Excelente proposta
commented 2025-10-30 15:50:05 UTC by Ed_slv ♦4
172773729
(Comments: 3)
Nzau
(Discussed changesets: 73)
Je viens de voir que highway=living_street est déjà correctement appliqué.
commented 2025-10-30 15:44:48 UTC by Nzau ♦143
173976824
(Comments: 2)
marktechratp
(Discussed changesets: 8)
ça peut apparaître bizarre, mais réellement c'est exactement ce qu'il y a pour l'instant, en attendant ce qu'ils vont rajouter
commented 2025-10-30 15:36:28 UTC by marktechratp ♦3
173935765
(Comments: 3)
wandelzot
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Top!
commented 2025-10-30 15:35:36 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦416
169473158
(Comments: 4)
Nzau
(Discussed changesets: 73)
Salut Charles,
Merci pour ton retour !
C'est assez drôle de voir qu'il n'y a qu'en Bretagne que j'ai eu des soucis avec ce type de modifications x)

Sinon oui je suis tout à fait d'accord pour p...
commented 2025-10-30 15:35:32 UTC by Nzau ♦143
173978514
(Comments: 1)
Grace Humphreys
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding the restaurant. Has this replaced "Slurp", previously mapped at 17 Frith Street?
commented 2025-10-30 15:34:45 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645
173549182
(Comments: 2)
voltairovicz
(Discussed changesets: 263)
Trzeba dać access=no zatem. Bo niby jest gotowa i niektórzy już korzystali ale widzę że oficjalnie nie można
commented 2025-10-30 15:34:14 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225
173784064
(Comments: 1)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173971929
commented 2025-10-30 15:33:02 UTC by maro21 ♦746
173962304
(Comments: 1)
Szymiii
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Czemu usunąłeś kolory dachów?
commented 2025-10-30 15:30:42 UTC by maro21 ♦746
173885310
(Comments: 1)
Szymiii
(Discussed changesets: 13)
- Budynek jest w trakcie budowy i nie ma 7 kondygnacji - dlaczego go ponownie dodałeś? Dlaczego dodałeś budynek jako wybudowany, skoro wybudowany nie jest?

- Gdzie można zweryfikować te dane? Przejrzałem podane strony i nie widzę gdzie...
commented 2025-10-30 15:29:36 UTC by maro21 ♦746
173757303
(Comments: 3)
Szymiii
(Discussed changesets: 13)
ad 3: Dodanie budynku w budowie jest ok, ale dodanie że ma 7 kondygnacji, kiedy tylu nie ma, nie jest ok.
ad 5: Na OSM nie mapujemy przyszłości, tylko stan zastany. Plany mogą się zmienić, lub nigdy nie urzeczywistnić. Np. ten budynek też ...
commented 2025-10-30 15:26:23 UTC by maro21 ♦746
170527896
(Comments: 1)
Damian05
(Discussed changesets: 48)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-30 15:22:29 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
171596369
(Comments: 1)
Damian05
(Discussed changesets: 48)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-30 15:22:15 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
164785052
(Comments: 2)
Nzau
(Discussed changesets: 73)
Bonjour josmougn,
Est-ce qu'il y a encore des vestiges de ses rails ? Si ce n'est pas le cas, alors railway=abandoned n'est pas adapté : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:railway%3Dabandoned

Et s'il reste...
commented 2025-10-30 15:21:40 UTC by Nzau ♦143
173851164
(Comments: 1)
mich345
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Ten zestaw zmian ze zmianą nazewnictwa nie ma nic wspólnego - stosuj się, proszę, do zasad opisanych tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-30 15:20:19 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173462822
(Comments: 1)
mich345
(Discussed changesets: 5)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-30 15:18:42 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173491503
(Comments: 1)
Ockmonek
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, I see that you noted Nafplia Hotel as disused. That's incorrect, the hotel still operates.
commented 2025-10-30 15:18:32 UTC by jimkats ♦75
173851770
(Comments: 1)
mich345
(Discussed changesets: 5)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-30 15:18:30 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173980253
(Comments: 1)
mich345
(Discussed changesets: 5)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-30 15:18:22 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173980468
(Comments: 1)
mich345
(Discussed changesets: 5)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-30 15:18:16 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173963409
(Comments: 3)
djsa
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Bedankt, nu staan we gelijk =
we zijn alle twee verkeerd.
Ik heb me laten misleiden door de note.
Of interpreteer ik het gebouw verkeerd ?
commented 2025-10-30 15:11:42 UTC by philippec ♦746
173619225
(Comments: 3)
simon_geovelo
(Discussed changesets: 99)
Bonjour,
PTNA est mon outil préféré de suivi de réseau: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/BRE/FR-BRE-TUB-Analysis.html

Après des modifs, on peut demander une nouvelle analyse avec résultat da...
commented 2025-10-30 15:03:12 UTC by mga_geo ♦267
173979152
(Comments: 1)
yticaa
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Algemeen

access:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise)
Wanneer het alleen voor wandelaars geldt dan
foot:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise)

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-30 14:53:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
172817259
(Comments: 1)
3D打印
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Why did you delete wikidata items? this information is very useful in my humble opinion.
commented 2025-10-30 14:50:39 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394
167762520
(Comments: 2)
Frogs Magoo
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Also displaying the speed limit from other sources is not allowed in an OSM editor.
commented 2025-10-30 14:44:50 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,402
173974974
(Comments: 1)
dekwak
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Wanneer wegen en woningen zijn opgeleverd zou ook de landuse construction kunnen worden aangepast
commented 2025-10-30 14:39:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173974916
(Comments: 1)
dekwak
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback In editor iD kun je ook een BGT achtergrond gebruiken. Dan kun je de wegen en parkeerplaatsen precies uitlijnen...
commented 2025-10-30 14:24:41 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173736329
(Comments: 1)
Lauragzf
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello, if you're using more specific tags than building=yes then please clearly state the source of that information. It is at times possible to spot e.g. some religious buildings from aerial imagery becasue they are visually distinct, but how d...
commented 2025-10-30 14:20:54 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173723092
(Comments: 1)
BiboORM
(Discussed changesets: 25)
Ciao BiboORM,
non sono riuscito a vedere sul terreno tracce di questa ferrovia. Mi confermi che da qualche parte è possibile rilevarla?
commented 2025-10-30 14:19:42 UTC by fb552 ♦18
173532207
(Comments: 3)
empty_child
(Discussed changesets: 27)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173978950
commented 2025-10-30 14:17:52 UTC by empty_child ♦357
173958963
(Comments: 2)
lukajankowski
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Dzień dobry,
w imieniu społeczności OpenStreetMap dziękuję za Pana wkład w rozwój mapy.
Chciałbym jednak zwrócić uwagę na sposób dodawania numerów telefonów. Wprowadzane numery nie zawierają numeru k...
commented 2025-10-30 14:05:46 UTC by Michaall99 ♦51
173902031
(Comments: 1)
kacper112
(Discussed changesets: 21)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5029855
commented 2025-10-30 14:03:31 UTC by kubahahaha ♦403
173977496
(Comments: 3)
nganhangmbbankcomvn
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173978221
where the changeset comment is:
Remove spam
commented 2025-10-30 14:00:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173960232
(Comments: 1)
superiorplum
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This POI contains ad copy, which is inappropriate in OSM. This POI is also in the middle of an intersection, not a place of business.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173977743
commented 2025-10-30 13:49:34 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173900904
(Comments: 2)
Endres Pelka
(Discussed changesets: 54)
Zgodnie z poradnikiem: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487

Nie należy dodawać sloganów reklamowych i opisów marketingowych w nazwie i opisie, słów kluczowych po...
commented 2025-10-30 13:48:33 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267
173900576
(Comments: 2)
:-}
(Discussed changesets: 186)
Co "Ciupagi"? Ponawiam prośbę, być dodawał źródło zmian dla rzeczy, które nie są kalkowaniem zdjęć z ortofotomap. Widzę, że dokonywałeś poprzednich aktualizacji tych dróg, więc dobrze wiedzieć, że są on...
commented 2025-10-30 13:38:17 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267
173361566
(Comments: 2)
CouscousPie
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello CouscousPie, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contibution.
OpenStreetMap is not a map but a geodatabase from which countless maps and applications are created. The respective map creator decides whether and how something is displayed. C...
commented 2025-10-30 13:37:52 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,354
173920107
(Comments: 1)
PEAL1993
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo Pearl, du halst die Zufahrt zum Industriegebiet gelöscht.. Gibt es da keine Verbindung mehr?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173920107

commented 2025-10-30 13:37:50 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413
169243141
(Comments: 4)
Filip009CZ
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Myslím, že to nie je oficiálny názov.

Ako plochu som to nedal preto, lebo som si nebol istý geometriou, kľudne môžeš upraviť, tak ako myslíš, že by to malo byť správne.
commented 2025-10-30 13:34:17 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦35
173966362
(Comments: 3)
Aldirinaldy
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Also: Please also write a meaningful comment, what you did exactly. Also where you got the information from. Is this your home town or have you visited this place, etc..
commented 2025-10-30 13:29:18 UTC by MaestroGlanz ♦37
173976349
(Comments: 3)
Kantor kryptowalut Bielsko Biała - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Kantor kryptowalut w Bielsku-Białej"
---
(Auto-translation)
commented 2025-10-30 13:27:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
159366306
(Comments: 1)
MaxR_6429
(Discussed changesets: 31)
Bonjour,

Je ne vois aucun chantier sur les imageries Sentinelle les récentes. Es-tu sur que le chantier a démarré et que ce n'est pas au stade de projet ?

Aurélien
commented 2025-10-30 13:20:21 UTC by AurélienQ ♦140
173975416
(Comments: 1)
waflR_zero
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173906547
commented 2025-10-30 13:09:14 UTC by waflR_zero ♦7
173975082
(Comments: 1)
waflR_zero
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919
commented 2025-10-30 13:08:36 UTC by waflR_zero ♦7
173495223
(Comments: 2)
Weathering
(Discussed changesets: 14)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
commented 2025-10-30 13:08:06 UTC by rhtb0 ♦254
173973160
(Comments: 1)
Torey360
(Discussed changesets: 40)
Saludos. Cual es el Soporte Legal para denominar este segmento de via como F50? las vias F son parte de la Red Vial Fundamental de Bolivia (RVF) y tienen que tener una LEY NACIONAL donde se las incluya, para su administracion por parte de la ABC.
...
commented 2025-10-30 13:07:52 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,210
173959441
(Comments: 9)
ufoncz
(Discussed changesets: 2)
It's displayable on OSM, that's enough. I feel I can remove the data I entered. I'm not trying to prevent anyone else from putting the trails on the map, though. There's a big chance it'll be more accurate than mine anyway.
commented 2025-10-30 13:07:43 UTC by ufoncz ♦2
173971565
(Comments: 4)
zmeuk
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Droga jest zamknęta na 3.5 miesęca.
Sprawdzę jak tam prowidlowo zrobić z tymi tegami
commented 2025-10-30 13:06:22 UTC by zmeuk ♦4
166939587
(Comments: 1)
vanessatryfi
(Discussed changesets: 11)
This appears to be an incomplete polygon for the Town Plaza mall, not just the doggy daycare.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166939587

commented 2025-10-30 13:05:05 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173974657
(Comments: 2)
Jack Kok
(Discussed changesets: 1)
這裡有一個基於你地圖編輯的示例評論:“添加咖啡店,甜點屬性”
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added coffee shop, dessert attributes"
commented 2025-10-30 12:56:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
172929121
(Comments: 3)
Leonardo Gutierrez
(Discussed changesets: 23)
Saludos, Una disculpa por la tardanza en la respuesta, gracias por tu comentario, estamos haciendo una prueba para poder calsificar las vias de acuerdo a como el gobierno colombiano las tienes, estas etiquetas son los puntos que manejan las concecion...
commented 2025-10-30 12:42:31 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦19
173974160
(Comments: 1)
waflR_zero
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919
commented 2025-10-30 12:37:43 UTC by waflR_zero ♦7
173973952
(Comments: 1)
waflR_zero
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919
commented 2025-10-30 12:37:22 UTC by waflR_zero ♦7
173937518
(Comments: 1)
Emil1887
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Hallo Emil,

hat sich hier die Parksituation von Parallelparken zu Diagonal-/Schrägparken verändert? Auf den 2024 und 2025er Luftbildern kann ich nur Parallelparker erkennen. Du hast ja als Quelle Survey angegeben. Kann ja sein, dass ...
commented 2025-10-30 12:34:00 UTC by fmc_3 ♦7
173972798
(Comments: 1)
kacper112
(Discussed changesets: 21)
Powiedzmy, że wyszła ci ta relacja zbiornika wodnego ale tereny zielone wewnątrz są jakieś ... utopione na mapie.
Prawdopodobnie brakło https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place=islet?uselang=pl ale warto też poczytać o wyspie.
...
commented 2025-10-30 12:33:05 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦551
173950664
(Comments: 3)
kabelhaai
(Discussed changesets: 25)
Op die pilaar is duidelijk niets, toch niets op de plaats van de vroegere foto.
In dit geval heb ik er geen bezwaar tegen het toch te mappen met een fixme en een note. Er zijn voldoende aanwijzingen dat er een AED is, en waarschijnlijk buiten.commented 2025-10-30 12:31:07 UTC by philippec ♦746
173570817
(Comments: 4)
Lidon Group
(Discussed changesets: 1)
ok thanks this is all new to me, appreciate the feedback.
commented 2025-10-30 12:23:27 UTC by Lidon Group ♦1
173973295
(Comments: 1)
Broadstaar
(Discussed changesets: 2)
added 34 houses
commented 2025-10-30 12:17:29 UTC by Broadstaar ♦1
173172954
(Comments: 1)
Михаил Колодий
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Нужно соединить этот кусочек с тропой, которая идет под ЛЭП.
commented 2025-10-30 12:09:25 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8
139821867
(Comments: 1)
SafetyIng
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Danke für überflüssige Verschlimmbesserungen - siehe osm.org/note/4565356
commented 2025-10-30 12:09:05 UTC by bwbuz ♦51
173972052
(Comments: 3)
Kantor kryptowalut Łódź - Bitcoin BTC To The Moon
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Kantor kryptowalut w Katowicach"
---
(Auto-translation)
commented 2025-10-30 11:48:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173333731
(Comments: 1)
Михаил Колодий
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Не существует на местности. Требуется удалить добавленный путь.
commented 2025-10-30 11:43:41 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8
173334682
(Comments: 1)
Михаил Колодий
(Discussed changesets: 9)
В ченжсете отображена несуществующая дорога. Нужно удалить с карты то, чего нет на местности.
commented 2025-10-30 11:42:35 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8
173334823
(Comments: 1)
Михаил Колодий
(Discussed changesets: 9)
В ченжсете отображены не существующие пути. Их нужно удалить.
commented 2025-10-30 11:41:18 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8
173335030
(Comments: 1)
Михаил Колодий
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Многие участки ченжесета не существуют на местности. Их необходимо удалить.
commented 2025-10-30 11:39:50 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8
173757268
(Comments: 1)
Kris74M
(Discussed changesets: 60)
Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2eBa. What is the mean of the tag "ref MZK Krotoszyn" = 272? Did you mean ref:MZK? What is the difference between "ref MZK Krotoszyn" and "ref MZK Ostrów Wlkp.&q...
commented 2025-10-30 11:34:33 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173971466
(Comments: 2)
modsagency
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Digital agency in Minnesota"
commented 2025-10-30 11:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173901253
(Comments: 1)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
ele zostało dokładnie wymierzone na podstawie rzeźby terenu a także profesjonalnych map topograficznych dostępnych na stronie Generalnej Dyrekcji Ochrony Środowiska. Twoje zmiany to czysty wandalizm
commented 2025-10-30 11:33:39 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225
173821177
(Comments: 1)
Ediats
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello Ediats,
Someone has deleted the things that you added here because they say that they did not exist.
They did that before, after they asked you about it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163509587 , but you did not reply.
Best...
commented 2025-10-30 11:32:31 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485
173669161
(Comments: 4)
bhartinegi_lyft
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Thank you for clarification.
commented 2025-10-30 11:32:01 UTC by bhartinegi_lyft ♦1
173902098
(Comments: 1)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
Świetnie się bawisz? Usuwając pracę innego użytkownika? Powiedz mi, ile map przejrzałeś z tej okolicy, że postanowiłeś sobie usunąć istniejącą przełęcz? Mam dosyć twoich uwag, komentarzy i zmian robionych na złość i szkodę mapuj...
commented 2025-10-30 11:31:48 UTC by voltairovicz ♦225
173971386
(Comments: 1)
JeLeB
(Discussed changesets: 1)
la pizzaria a demenage, il y a une autre restauration qui va s'ouvrir
commented 2025-10-30 11:31:12 UTC by JeLeB ♦1
173971299
(Comments: 2)
Natasha Denona
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Natasha Denona store"
commented 2025-10-30 11:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173971178
(Comments: 2)
grzegorz75jan
(Discussed changesets: 20)
https://postimg.cc/gallery/dZXczzJ
commented 2025-10-30 11:30:30 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦551
173042455
(Comments: 4)
0svald
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Oh, that's cool trivia! Good luck!

Noteworthy is that when adding separate parking spaces, iD editor raises errors regarding tags on adjacent ways. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=4779348#map=19/59.404757/24.724208
commented 2025-10-30 11:29:09 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦17
173763690
(Comments: 2)
Михаил Колодий
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Михаил Колодий, зачем вы вносите в OSM несуществующие на местности объекты?

проект не предназначен для хранения исторической информа...
commented 2025-10-30 11:26:47 UTC by literan ♦6,844
173872264
(Comments: 2)
NGlf
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hi, nice catch. I copied the value 'Παραλία Κατερίνης' (the city tag) and i pasted this on JOSM in a haste as a tag with value.
commented 2025-10-30 11:20:15 UTC by NGlf ♦11
173332152
(Comments: 1)
Михаил Колодий
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Многих добавленных троп не существует на местности. Нельзя добавлять несуществующие тропы.
commented 2025-10-30 11:03:35 UTC by asphaltisboring ♦8
173969856
(Comments: 2)
diamondscapewny
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Landscape and design company in Lockport"
commented 2025-10-30 11:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173964443
(Comments: 1)
chr0me
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hei,

Poistit aika monta rakennusta, kadottaen tietoja ja muokkaushistoriaa, ilmeisesti vain muuttaaksesi niiden muotoa huonompaan suuntaan. Samoin asuinalueen polygoni ulottuu nyt Matkailijasillan yli, joka on julkista aluetta. Tämä ...
commented 2025-10-30 10:54:45 UTC by thautal ♦43
173938439
(Comments: 11)
Tomas Straupis
(Discussed changesets: 79)
Pulko ir Ulonų yra net visai iš kitos lygos, tai yra net valstybinius numerius turintys keliai (kas reiškia ir atitinkamą jų priežiūrą bei kokybės standartus), tai jų buvimas „aukštojoje lygoje“ net nediskutuo...
commented 2025-10-30 10:50:05 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,990
173700358
(Comments: 1)
salmSALM
(Discussed changesets: 9)


نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة

commented 2025-10-30 10:49:38 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦718
173185503
(Comments: 1)
salmSALM
(Discussed changesets: 9)


نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة

commented 2025-10-30 10:49:35 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦718
172896460
(Comments: 1)
salmSALM
(Discussed changesets: 9)


نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة

commented 2025-10-30 10:49:29 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦718
173969220
(Comments: 1)
felipeeugenio
(Discussed changesets: 217)
Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment
5029138 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:45\tclosed\tok
5029139 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:45\tclosed\tok
5029140 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:45\tclosed\tok
commented 2025-10-30 10:49:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173920766
(Comments: 1)
Budros
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Cześć, zmianę poprawiłem, zapoznaj się z tagiem `landuse=construction` - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction
commented 2025-10-30 10:49:02 UTC by stasiu512 ♦192
172945973
(Comments: 5)
karr4s
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Fausse alerte il s'agit désormais d'un Carrefour City -> j'ai tout regroupé en un seul building et indiqué les business qui existent encore en un noeud, meilleure option dès lors que l'emprise n'...
commented 2025-10-30 10:47:19 UTC by divaddivag ♦122
173969105
(Comments: 1)
felipeeugenio
(Discussed changesets: 217)
Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment
5029143 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:44\tclosed\tok
5029145 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-30 11:44\tclosed\tcambiado a path el camino que sigue. COn eso ya, para efectos de autos, es sin salid...
commented 2025-10-30 10:46:47 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
101139405
(Comments: 3)
Brendan 'Speedie' Smith
(Discussed changesets: 5)
This has since been resolved in
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102212248
commented 2025-10-30 10:46:10 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦696
126393568
(Comments: 2)
Brendan 'Speedie' Smith
(Discussed changesets: 5)
This has since been resolved. It is clearly unmarked (also based on Mapillary), so zebra tag was removed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134944551
commented 2025-10-30 10:43:41 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦696
33600543
(Comments: 2)
Brendan 'Speedie' Smith
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Based on other edits by this user this was an accident/mistake. The only other thing which may be missing with this castle is its supposed later use as ball alley (of which walls should still be visible), would need surveying.

Removed in
ht...
commented 2025-10-30 10:41:19 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦696
173963394
(Comments: 1)
ortho_is_hot
(Discussed changesets: 53)
Many thanks for this update.
commented 2025-10-30 10:37:53 UTC by tastrax ♦1,171
173968149
(Comments: 1)
ncrau
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Je confirme l'ortographe du mot "Passans" qui correspond sans doute aux usages de la période 1740 - 1835.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9forme_de_l%27orthographe_fran%C3%A7aise_de_1835
commented 2025-10-30 10:35:47 UTC by ncrau ♦1
173832671
(Comments: 2)
Prasanna Devi
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have updated oneway tag. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
commented 2025-10-30 10:27:55 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦10
169010945
(Comments: 2)
Jetsie
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Je hebt gewoon een pad op een pad geplakt. We noemen dat duplicated ways. Ik heb het verwijderd

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-30 10:16:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
98136965
(Comments: 2)
Brendan 'Speedie' Smith
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hey Victor,

Though this changeset is 4 years old, based on Mapillary (and the similar usernames), this path is a duplicate of the road.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899965275
seems to be incomplete to the north and part of that end ...
commented 2025-10-30 10:16:11 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦696
173963275
(Comments: 5)
Nick24_
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Майже всі зміни, які вносив на карту, я оглядав особисто на місцевості і маю фото розмітки та дорожніх знаків. Намагаюсь перенести на кар...
commented 2025-10-30 10:03:42 UTC by Nick24_ ♦2
173928536
(Comments: 2)
csikth
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour, ayant une expérience personnelle des lieux pour y travailler, j'affirme que la délimitation entre le bâtiment numéro 7 et la bâtiment numéro 11 ne reflète pas la réalité
commented 2025-10-30 10:03:09 UTC by csikth ♦1
173582291
(Comments: 4)
Roel Janken
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Dag Roel,

In OSRM routeert het gewoon wat eigenlijk niet de bedoeling is.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.869665%2C5.853846%3B51.873282%2C5.850375#map=17/51.871480/5.852151

In andere OSM ...
commented 2025-10-30 10:00:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
153462812
(Comments: 1)
Mathias_ADAV
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Bonjour je met ce commentaire pour vous informer qu'il existe le tag cycleway=link (ainsi que footway=link) qui remplit la fonction pour laquelle vous aviez utiliser ce chemin
commented 2025-10-30 09:55:30 UTC by JigAma ♦9
165386556
(Comments: 1)
Gen_Gavi
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Pourquoi inventes-tu des ponts qui n'existent pas ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380864171#map=19/46.237128/5.985370
commented 2025-10-30 09:53:38 UTC by Marc Mongenet ♦25
173966739
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hello?! Please have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173951679#c1504962
commented 2025-10-30 09:52:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173877738
(Comments: 2)
KarooDesert
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Thank you for reaching out and raising that concern. I’ll ensure the connection to the Nugzar Shanava Street is accurate and everything is properly aligned.
Again thank you for catching that! Happy Mapping!
commented 2025-10-30 09:52:15 UTC by KarooDesert ♦5
162271309
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 09:52:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173959623
(Comments: 1)
barrybarry123
(Discussed changesets: 2)
1. Please don't add `man_made=pier` directly when it's not constructed yet. `landuse=construction` + `construction:man_made=` has already been added.
2. `=pier` is for perpendicular ones projecting into the sea, not the same as loose col...
commented 2025-10-30 09:47:02 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629
170934377
(Comments: 1)
allwe231
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Lebih baik bikin garis sungai baru daripada menggunakan perimeter waduknya untuk dijadikan garis sungai.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55059577/history#map=15/-6.74825/107.26087
commented 2025-10-30 09:37:14 UTC by FajrAl ♦104
173965822
(Comments: 1)
Monseigneur_Patate
(Discussed changesets: 1)
small error in my comment, obviously it's a building
commented 2025-10-30 09:33:09 UTC by Monseigneur_Patate ♦1
173915794
(Comments: 1)
wegavision
(Discussed changesets: 127)
Ciao.
Ho ripristinato la relazione del 522.
Immagino che tu abbia aggiunto le way per raggiungere il guidepost che è solo un segnale di avvicinamento.

Ivo
commented 2025-10-30 09:28:16 UTC by Jrachi ♦798
173939715
(Comments: 1)
Piagno
(Discussed changesets: 124)
When I walked past, there were no signs for Hanspi, also the website is out of date (course begins 2023)
commented 2025-10-30 09:26:48 UTC by mcg1878 ♦2
148918756
(Comments: 4)
MHNS
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Yes, I removed the access restrictions because this is a public park and a public street. If parking is not allowed on the street, then map that.
commented 2025-10-30 09:22:11 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276
157179261
(Comments: 1)
Osm1980
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Thank you for your attention.
commented 2025-10-30 09:21:34 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦424
171200247
(Comments: 3)
Miselajus
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Da haben wir unterschiedliche Beobachtungen im Gelände gemacht. Bei den von mir tatsächlich durch Begehung kartierten Standorten habe ich – wie bereits erwähnt –Kohlenreste finden können. Vielleicht hast Du nur nicht d...
commented 2025-10-30 09:16:53 UTC by ti_rey_531 ♦8
173936038
(Comments: 1)
Cowboy79
(Discussed changesets: 30)
Hi,
wäre schön, wenn du deinen Änderungssatz mit einem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
versiehst.
Gruß
tux67
---

Published using OSMCha: htt...
commented 2025-10-30 09:16:46 UTC by tux67 ♦1,982
173905737
(Comments: 3)
alain2003
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Hi alain2003,
Thanks for sharing the references and for your work on the map!
According to highway=primary, the primary classification already serves well as a major road connecting cities and areas, even before the expressway is fully complete...
commented 2025-10-30 09:13:24 UTC by nona mostafa ♦75
173964754
(Comments: 2)
safetreellc
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tree services company"
commented 2025-10-30 09:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173955649
(Comments: 1)
alinratna
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Halo Mba/Mas, bisa bergabung ke grup telegram OSM Indonesia ? disana nanti bisa saling diskusi dan sharing terkait mapping di OSM ya. t.me/osmindonesia
commented 2025-10-30 09:12:36 UTC by Akrimullah ♦41
173960760
(Comments: 5)
miayang1661
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please stay away from complex areas, like here, tall, high buildings which need a specific knowledge how to map them.
Please focus till you are experienced, on rural easy tasks.

Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (mult...
commented 2025-10-30 09:09:02 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
173960776
(Comments: 2)
SafwatHalaby
(Discussed changesets: 77)
מתוכנן לבצע את השינוי הזה בכלל ישראל, דיון כאן: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/137190
commented 2025-10-30 09:07:26 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656
173964060
(Comments: 2)
melihgullu7
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Burada harita düzenleme işlemlerine dayalı bir örnek yorum vardır: "Binalar eklendi, adı 'tarla' olan tarım arazileri"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added bu...
commented 2025-10-30 09:06:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
155788186
(Comments: 2)
Teremys
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Bonjour,
La station a été déplacée le temps des travaux :

https://www.c-velo.fr/2023/11/13/travaux-dans-le-secteur-les-paulines/

Mais effectivement le nouvel emplacement a l'air d'avoir é...
commented 2025-10-30 09:00:20 UTC by Teremys ♦7
173963835
(Comments: 2)
başak barin
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Burada harita düzenleme işlemlerine dayalı bir örnek yorum var: "Sokak, mahalle ve isim detayları ile terzi dükkanı eklendi"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added ta...
commented 2025-10-30 08:56:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173961483
(Comments: 1)
jp1212
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Dear jp1212, when you delete paths from OpenStreetMap, please provide an explanation for that in the changeset comment. "Modification" is not enough - we can see that you have modified something but we want to know why you think the path do...
commented 2025-10-30 08:39:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,479
148917986
(Comments: 3)
MHNS
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hello,

Even if the trail was completely on private property, deleting it from the map is not allowed. You can read about this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

So either way, the trail should b...
commented 2025-10-30 08:32:13 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276
173962617
(Comments: 1)
LupulSiberian
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi LupulSiberian, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 10 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)

Could ...
commented 2025-10-30 08:23:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
135136552
(Comments: 3)
Thierry1030
(Discussed changesets: 101)
Perfect, thanks for the background info! It threw an error in osmose, which is why I was looking for some context. Much appreciated!
commented 2025-10-30 08:18:43 UTC by djsa ♦22
173696133
(Comments: 2)
Maurine Oyugi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Can I please have an answer?
commented 2025-10-30 08:15:57 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173902813
(Comments: 3)
silly_me
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Stimmt, ein optimales Tagging gibt es dafür nicht, Habe die Sportarten ergänzt. Wenn die Website schon beworben wird, wird sie wohl auch bald online sein
commented 2025-10-30 08:12:04 UTC by Till_btn ♦25
162272102
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 07:58:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
13267829
(Comments: 1)
kristal
(Discussed changesets: 2)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162664761/history - skąd ta nazwa?
commented 2025-10-30 07:54:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173944495
(Comments: 3)
Elefant aus Wuppertal
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Wenn du mit level=1 nicht einverstanden bist, dann sollten stattdessen der Zugang unterhalb der Brücke und die Straße unterhalb der Brücke mit level=-1 gekennzeichnet werden, da sich diese in einer Senke befinden. Bezüglich des Z...
commented 2025-10-30 07:51:07 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦7
165389932
(Comments: 1)
hlmvanderheiden
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Nog geen welkomstbericht ontvangen zie ik. Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community

commented 2025-10-30 07:45:21 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
162304818
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 07:37:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162306330
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 07:30:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173960680
(Comments: 1)
jp1212
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi jp1212, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these ...
commented 2025-10-30 07:29:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173947439
(Comments: 1)
Ramazanenescik04
(Discussed changesets: 1)
İnşa halindeki yapıların doğru etiketleme şeması şurada anlatılmış. Hatalı etiketleri düzelttim. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction

"nolur kontrol edin" ifadeniz kastettiğiniz yolların geometriler...
commented 2025-10-30 07:29:29 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
162306494
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 07:28:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162362294
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 07:24:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162362914
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 07:20:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162537180
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 07:16:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162537484
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 07:16:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173958763
(Comments: 1)
Artisan Olive Oil Company
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Address tags corrected.

Regards Bernard.
commented 2025-10-30 07:07:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948
173945899
(Comments: 1)
Robotnikmajowy
(Discussed changesets: 117)
Cześć! Jeżeli poprawiasz relacje autobusowe to proszę rób to porządnie, bo obecnie relacje autobusowe przebiegające przez wiadukt mają wrzucony bez żadnego porządku fragment Chełmżyńskiej. Poza tym uporządkowałem tagowanie wszyst...
commented 2025-10-30 07:00:53 UTC by SzymonH ♦215
125581552
(Comments: 1)
HaPe-CZ
(Discussed changesets: 90)
hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5029335 ?

Has this plans turned into anything real?
commented 2025-10-30 06:58:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173939235
(Comments: 1)
lohitashwa
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you new highway are all duplicating existing highways which could disrupt routing. Thus I've reverted the changeset, all is now OK.

Regards Bernard.
commented 2025-10-30 06:56:16 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948
173933354
(Comments: 3)
zsoooc
(Discussed changesets: 1)
*derékszögesítés eszközt

Mindegy a lényeg átment. Köszi!
commented 2025-10-30 06:53:04 UTC by gabro00 ♦328
173947261
(Comments: 1)
Shulamit Maler
(Discussed changesets: 1)
ברוכים הבאים ל-OSM ותודה על התרומה!

כמה הערות קטנות:

א. הוספת בניין חדש שהזוויות שלו לא 90 מושלמות. כדי ליישר אותו, יש ללחוץ לחיצה ימני...
commented 2025-10-30 06:49:14 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656
173947908
(Comments: 1)
Haley Patel
(Discussed changesets: 1)
## Movement of a node
Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/11227635392, https://www.osm.org/node/7047003588 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the nodes back to the original pos...
commented 2025-10-30 06:48:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173657367
(Comments: 2)
Tsu-Yi Su
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi Gregory,

Thank you for the reminder, I will be more careful next time.

Best Regards,
Tsu-Yi
commented 2025-10-30 06:46:35 UTC by Tsu-Yi Su ♦7
173957935
(Comments: 3)
Inner West Electrician
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi, I deleted the business details added to a footway junction.
You need to place a new node (or point) at the location that your business operates from and add all you relevant business tags to that point.
commented 2025-10-30 06:45:49 UTC by nevw ♦2,063
173949862
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi,
some names have been changed again in this changeset.
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
commented 2025-10-30 06:42:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173949982
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi,
some names have been changed again in this changeset.
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
commented 2025-10-30 06:42:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173950888
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi,
some names have been changed again in this changeset.
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
commented 2025-10-30 06:41:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173951453
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi,
some names have been changed again in this changeset.
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
commented 2025-10-30 06:40:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173951679
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi,
some names have been changed again in this changeset.
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
commented 2025-10-30 06:40:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173957877
(Comments: 1)
Inner West Electrician
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I deleted this addition of business details to a roadway junction.
commented 2025-10-30 06:39:13 UTC by nevw ♦2,063
173946493
(Comments: 1)
bilge525
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Merhaba. Birçok bina eklemişsiniz fakat değişiklik açıklamanıza yalnızca "farm" yazmışsınız. Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınıza kısaca ne yaptığınızı yazınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap....
commented 2025-10-30 06:39:01 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
173957475
(Comments: 1)
EinEngener
(Discussed changesets: 130)
Hallo EinEngener,

Die Bildlinks sind nicht aufrufbar (Login required), das sind nicht die öffentlichen Links von wikimedia commons.

Für Bilder von WikiCommons gibt es einen eigenen Tag, am besten diesen nutzen. https://wiki.op...
commented 2025-10-30 06:37:04 UTC by cowboyxup ♦24
173661339
(Comments: 1)
belltorito
(Discussed changesets: 1)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4553683089/history

is it really amenity=bank and shop=department_store at the same time?

have you tried to update POI that is not a bank anymore?
commented 2025-10-30 06:31:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173914722
(Comments: 2)
PRIMAstmp25
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Vale, voy a fijarme a partir de ahora en las etiquetas. Gracias por tus comentarios
commented 2025-10-30 06:26:13 UTC by PRIMAstmp25 ♦2
173957378
(Comments: 3)
hardikpatelallstateinsurance
(Discussed changesets: 1)
I removed the blatant rubbish/ad copy description.
commented 2025-10-30 06:20:37 UTC by skquinn ♦808
162537661
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 06:18:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173579250
(Comments: 2)
PRIMAstmp25
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Vale, lo voy a tener en cuenta para las siguientes. Muchísimas gracias por tus comentarios
commented 2025-10-30 06:17:35 UTC by PRIMAstmp25 ♦2
162538147
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 06:02:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162548162
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 05:40:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173957113
(Comments: 1)
nevw
(Discussed changesets: 102)
correction: source was Protected areas of Queensland 2025.
commented 2025-10-30 05:40:47 UTC by nevw ♦2,063
171524878
(Comments: 1)
Heterodyne
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hello, It was unnecessary to map the building as a multipolygon, the outer footprint would have sufficed. I think the dark spot in the middle is caused by a feature on the roof casting a shadow. In some places you mapped solar panels as buildings. Mo...
commented 2025-10-30 05:20:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173913278
(Comments: 2)
JöWe
(Discussed changesets: 1)
- der "Waldweg" ist eine forstwirtschaftliche Holzrückegasse, die inzwischen wieder Besuchs aufweist
- der "Parkplatz" ist eine asphaltierte Privatfläche
commented 2025-10-30 05:13:20 UTC by JöWe ♦1
173954655
(Comments: 2)
LanceSong77
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed toilet amenities, including name and attributes"
commented 2025-10-30 04:56:26 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
172910546
(Comments: 1)
NoKnow
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hello, The living street here is more or less straight and you'll only have enough room to fit everything if you move the building footprints to the base of buildings.
commented 2025-10-30 04:55:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
162548552
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 04:53:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173954910
(Comments: 2)
Felysha_
(Discussed changesets: 1)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/TomTom

> TomTom is actively organizing mapping events. All edits made during those events are distinguished by the hashtag #tt_events.

> If you have remarks about a ...
commented 2025-10-30 04:45:46 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173829452
(Comments: 2)
Ra_colate
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Thank you for the message. I’m glad to help, happy mapping!
commented 2025-10-30 04:41:04 UTC by Ra_colate ♦17
167515107
(Comments: 11)
hayashi
(Discussed changesets: 13)
あなたに改善の見込みがありませんでしたので、Data Working Groupへ報告させて頂きました。それ以降、ここでお伝えしたタグ付け方法を守られていることに感謝します。
あなたは明きら...
commented 2025-10-30 04:30:15 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦28
168993087
(Comments: 3)
Flap Slimy Outward
(Discussed changesets: 91)
To be more specific, the issue with this approach is that when someone marks the road open again the turn restrictions aren't likely to be removed since the access tag is the usual method to mark a road that's closed.
commented 2025-10-30 04:17:45 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127
162563324
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 04:04:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162563488
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 03:56:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162623630
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 03:56:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162624240
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 03:56:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173914993
(Comments: 1)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Die Adresse an der Trauerhalle ist ja korrekt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
commented 2025-10-30 03:52:02 UTC by Bienson ♦351
162625651
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 03:49:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
163099309
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
co na celu miała zmiana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355232129/history ?
commented 2025-10-30 03:48:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
162938192
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-30 03:46:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173954843
(Comments: 1)
ika-chan!
(Discussed changesets: 76)
The destination waypoint name mentioned on the EO6 and EO15 relation is Mourgani bridge, not Mourgani.
commented 2025-10-30 02:40:38 UTC by ika-chan! ♦296
173954046
(Comments: 1)
Danny Witt
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ...
commented 2025-10-30 02:21:16 UTC by MassCartog ♦217
173949124
(Comments: 1)
Bootheel
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ...
commented 2025-10-30 02:10:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦217
173924095
(Comments: 1)
1981Isarom
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour et bienvenue.

Attention : les photos aériennes ne doivent pas être utilisées pour redessiner des maisons car elles montrent une image déformée de la réalité. Pour les bâtiments, uni...
commented 2025-10-30 01:30:25 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
173942227
(Comments: 1)
Yxngtrxll
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, the amenity=veterinary tag should only be on the node for the clinic itself, not the building way. You can add extra details to the building way like clarifying what type of building, but the double amenity=veterinary is a duplication of the same...
commented 2025-10-30 01:23:33 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
173734605
(Comments: 3)
K&K13
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Awesome! I just know some armchair mappers overseas don't usually realize cul de sacs at corners like that usually denote a two-way intersection here and wanted to make sure.
commented 2025-10-30 00:47:27 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173734471
(Comments: 3)
K&K13
(Discussed changesets: 3)
No worries, glad to help!
commented 2025-10-30 00:45:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173953120
(Comments: 1)
demaniac
(Discussed changesets: 130)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264845537...
commented 2025-10-30 00:41:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173940699
(Comments: 2)
vanagaudi
(Discussed changesets: 27)
Hello Ceirios,

Thank you for you comment.

Actually in German discussion group there was a post showing some funny traffic sign which this is one of it, just because of equal distances. I wondered how to find that location and I was luck...
commented 2025-10-30 00:16:02 UTC by vanagaudi ♦30
173931412
(Comments: 1)
@Muneebafzal
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003899336/history/31). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/change...
commented 2025-10-30 00:02:31 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64
173952365
(Comments: 2)
pophob
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added surveillance cameras with ALPR type, Flock Safety manufacturer, for school and traffic zones"
commented 2025-10-29 23:56:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173948698
(Comments: 1)
_IvAn_111
(Discussed changesets: 1)
А точно нет ошибки в названии улицы?

Согласно сообщению мэрии - https://kzn.ru/meriya/press-tsentr/novosti/v-privolzhskom-rayone-kazani-poyavitsya-shest-novykh-ulits/ - так назвали ...
commented 2025-10-29 23:52:32 UTC by fndoder ♦99
167447296
(Comments: 1)
Somnath Darkunde
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Did not folow task instructions
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167447296

commented 2025-10-29 23:13:12 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127
165483178
(Comments: 3)
Daan Vanderveken
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Hello!

Actually, here in France the routes are managed by local association who ask permission to local authorities to create the signposting. That is why we try to create one relation (or superrelation) per local operator.
Cheers,
St.
commented 2025-10-29 23:13:00 UTC by StC ♦351
172971489
(Comments: 1)
JuanjoMC
(Discussed changesets: 24)
I passed by today and made pictures > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1162028802546675
There are still some missing paths ...
commented 2025-10-29 23:12:36 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦255
165457393
(Comments: 1)
Somnath Darkunde
(Discussed changesets: 7)
The highway definitely doesn't go over one track then connect to the subsequent one.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165457393

commented 2025-10-29 23:09:14 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127
173951676
(Comments: 1)
kechan_Rapid
(Discussed changesets: 13)
*and roads
commented 2025-10-29 23:04:49 UTC by kechan_Rapid ♦6
171420473
(Comments: 3)
Andreas_89
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Inte helt enkelt detta, men jag byter till city_block som är ännu mindre. Den är omgiven av gator, precis som dessa. Dessa är dock inte i en stad, men ifall någon kommer på något mer passande är det bara att...
commented 2025-10-29 23:04:25 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦619
173951633
(Comments: 1)
Glassman
(Discussed changesets: 71)
This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 172501426.
commented 2025-10-29 23:01:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
172501426
(Comments: 1)
Tourism_info
(Discussed changesets: 9)
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173951633 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit
commented 2025-10-29 23:01:44 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
173950826
(Comments: 1)
demaniac
(Discussed changesets: 130)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13269002924
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
commented 2025-10-29 22:51:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173937549
(Comments: 2)
Fjarre
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Du kan också skapa relationer för vandringsleder/motionsspår där du kan ange namn, vem som förvaltar leden, osv.

Kolla ex på: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5539138
Eller: https://www.openstreetmap....
commented 2025-10-29 22:42:39 UTC by maasa123 ♦12
37788284
(Comments: 1)
mapper999
(Discussed changesets: 110)
Hallo mapper999,
zu dem von dir (vor sehr langer Zeit) erstellten Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4057042002 gibt es jetzt den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5017034. Vielleicht magst du was dazu sagen und dort einen Kommenta...
commented 2025-10-29 22:34:55 UTC by george1201 ♦237
173758047
(Comments: 5)
maximaximax
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Sometimes people use landuse=recreation_ground + sport=horse_racing instead of leisure=sports_centre + sport=horse_racing. I don't care, as long as you don't confuse leisure=horse_riding (+ sport=equestrian) with something + sport=horse_rac...
commented 2025-10-29 22:26:45 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦835
173893337
(Comments: 5)
NXN
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Co do ustawy, to jest Uchwała Krajobrazowa. Ma charakter lokalny, nie ogólnokrajowy. Z tego co wiem w gminie Raszyn ta Uchwała dopiero ma wejść w życie, ale deweloperom na etapie uzyskania pozwolenia na budowę mogą narzucać warunki gro...
commented 2025-10-29 22:23:02 UTC by NXN ♦6
173950495
(Comments: 1)
Jose7
(Discussed changesets: 2)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres strony internetowej został skrócony przez serwis t...
commented 2025-10-29 22:20:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173904201
(Comments: 2)
NXN
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Nie jestem autorem tego tag'u, ale wygląda na pozostałości od innego status odcinka chodnika. Naprawione, dzięki za uwagę.
commented 2025-10-29 22:17:29 UTC by NXN ♦6
173919602
(Comments: 2)
MaNaujoks
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13265454452:
Du hast hier eine Talsperre angelegt. Das ist defintiv falsch. Gleichzeitig steht in name "Löschwasserbrunnen"; zum einen muss der Name raus, zum anderen is...
commented 2025-10-29 22:13:24 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173895201
(Comments: 1)
MaNaujoks
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo,
bitte Warnungen des Editors beachten, du hast hier Straßen, Wasserläufe und landuses verschoben.
Ich habe das mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173950392 korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-29 22:05:07 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173363403
(Comments: 1)
Atdec Nantes Métropole
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour,

Merci pour votre contribution, mais l'adresse est maintenant incohérente avec la position du point.

Il faut que vous supprimiez ce point et en recréez un nouveau au nouvel emplacement. Ou éventuellemen...
commented 2025-10-29 22:03:38 UTC by zorun ♦8
159978964
(Comments: 1)
maferarq
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Hola. En las numeraciones por favor solo la numeración. La palabra Parcela sobra en este caso.

Gracias
commented 2025-10-29 22:03:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173886056
(Comments: 1)
turbopixel
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo,
wenn der Hydrant noch vorhanden, aber nicht mehr in Betrieb ist, diesen dann bitte nicht löschen und auf disused:emergency=fire_hydrant setzen. Sonst besteht das Risiko, dass dieser wieder neu angelegt wird.
Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-29 22:02:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173950307
(Comments: 1)
felipeeugenio
(Discussed changesets: 217)
Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment
5028988 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 23:00\tclosed\tok
5029002 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 23:00\tclosed\tok
5028995 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 23:00\tclosed\tok
5029009 (iD)\tfel...
commented 2025-10-29 22:01:46 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
165290910
(Comments: 1)
vanessatryfi
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Changing the layer means this is above the ground, not on the ground.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165290910

commented 2025-10-29 21:54:43 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173934203
(Comments: 1)
Mastodommte
(Discussed changesets: 5)
I reverted some parts of your edit.
The Wild Rover is still there. I surveyed it tonight to be sure. It is still operating.
commented 2025-10-29 21:53:10 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
173886817
(Comments: 1)
turbopixel
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo,
wenn du gerade ohnehin mit der Kontrolle und Überarbeitung befasst bist: da Hydranten keinen Namen haben wäre es schön, wenn du diese Namen entfernen würdest.
Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-29 21:52:46 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173943101
(Comments: 1)
PaulDavis249
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thanks for keeping the map up to date. The point you moved is on the wall of the building. Is that where the entrance for your office is? Typically we put the place point inside the building and have a separate point for the entrance.
commented 2025-10-29 21:52:38 UTC by iandees ♦752
163015786
(Comments: 1)
vanessatryfi
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Probably should be name=K-9 Resorts branch=Westbury. Name should only be the name.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163015786

commented 2025-10-29 21:49:07 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
172378039
(Comments: 1)
dugolf60
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Bonjour,

Concernant les fermetures, il vaut mieux également supprimer les tags qui deviennent caduques. Sinon, cela peut déclencher des alertes comme : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005130...
commented 2025-10-29 21:46:01 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦22
156717065
(Comments: 1)
Zesstra
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo Zesstra!
Bei diesem Knoten stimmte deine Änderung von 2024 aber ganz und gar nicht ... Warst du denn 2024/09 dort?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4146923451

Ich war heute dort, da ist ein seit längerer Zeit leerst...
commented 2025-10-29 21:41:34 UTC by goodidea ♦102
173883629
(Comments: 1)
Alex Tzimas
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen:
- Auch wenn das der Name „laut Gemeinde“ ist: ausschlaggebend ist das, was auf dem Schild steht.
- Die Adressen passen jetzt ...
commented 2025-10-29 21:35:43 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173943509
(Comments: 5)
kubahahaha
(Discussed changesets: 213)
Ja bym zostawił rozdzielenie, aby nikomu nie przyszło do głowy ponownie rozdzielać połączone fragmenty (przy okazji zapewne psując przy tym relacje).
commented 2025-10-29 21:32:43 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
173619466
(Comments: 1)
MaxR_6429
(Discussed changesets: 31)
Hello MaxR_6429.

I noticed you opened up Horadiz-Cəbrayıl-Zəngilan-Ağbənd yolu. According to various articles from 2025-09-16 (https://report.az/en/infrastructure/horadiz-jabrayil-zangilan-aghband-road-95-complete, https://report.az/en/in...
commented 2025-10-29 21:31:59 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦17
173936931
(Comments: 1)
J00SECI
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Hola J00SECI,

¿Basado en qué fuente has modificado la geometría de los elementos existentes?

¿Podrías dejar de hacer estos cambios sin sentido?

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
commented 2025-10-29 21:30:00 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦114
173597567
(Comments: 1)
AutumnLaw
(Discussed changesets: 1)
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173949408
commented 2025-10-29 21:27:24 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127
173949286
(Comments: 1)
Căprar Andrei
(Discussed changesets: 5)
extra source: survey
commented 2025-10-29 21:26:51 UTC by Căprar Andrei ♦4
173943859
(Comments: 1)
Mick Kolb
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Vorausgesetzt, es handelt es sich grundsätzlich um die Bauform „Unterflurhydrant“, habe ich folgende Anmerkungen:
- ...
commented 2025-10-29 21:26:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
159153734
(Comments: 1)
vanessatryfi
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Please don't adapt buildings into landuse like this. Easiest way to add a dog park if you're not sure how to map it is to just add a single point node, not to decide a building doesn't exist and is now a different shape.
...
commented 2025-10-29 21:13:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173934812
(Comments: 17)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Leo.. thx.
Gr eggie
commented 2025-10-29 21:07:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173268766
(Comments: 1)
anautiyal_lyft
(Discussed changesets: 6)
This changeset connected a bridge to the road it crosses.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173268766

commented 2025-10-29 21:07:18 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127
173367931
(Comments: 1)
vanessatryfi
(Discussed changesets: 11)
No, this isn't a building. Accuracy matters.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173367931

commented 2025-10-29 21:04:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173925523
(Comments: 1)
moltes74
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This changeset connected a bridge to the road it crosses.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173925523

commented 2025-10-29 20:59:54 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127
173368459
(Comments: 1)
MWBtfd
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Boy, put my road back
commented 2025-10-29 20:58:56 UTC by andrew-m8387 ♦1
152929060
(Comments: 2)
Thibault Rommel
(Discussed changesets: 53)
Hello
I work for the traffic department of the city, so I know the situation quite well. The one-way mapping is correct. You can check by comparing it with the traffic sign data available here: https://www.geopunt.be/shared/5a1360ad-883b-40f4-bf3a...
commented 2025-10-29 20:56:16 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦82
166199073
(Comments: 1)
raf57575757
(Discussed changesets: 5)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-29 20:55:44 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173947077
(Comments: 1)
raf57575757
(Discussed changesets: 5)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-29 20:55:27 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173098189
(Comments: 1)
mapmakersami
(Discussed changesets: 1)
hi there! while i do not disagree with your change, please note that "unclassified" has a very distinct meaning in OSM highway tagging, it is not an "unidentified" road type.
commented 2025-10-29 20:47:22 UTC by jcarlson ♦117
173947691
(Comments: 1)
Lars2435
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-29 20:43:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173859107
(Comments: 2)
Anas masuris
(Discussed changesets: 129)
Fair, wycofam zaraz zmianę w takim razie
commented 2025-10-29 20:40:39 UTC by Anas masuris ♦138
173937062
(Comments: 1)
BlueMethod
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13267350845. Please notice the difference between a name and a description.
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at ht...
commented 2025-10-29 20:27:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173947048
(Comments: 2)
hibvv
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "J'ai supprimé le restaurant, mis à jour les détails de l'immeuble d'appartements"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sa...
commented 2025-10-29 20:27:00 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173940736
(Comments: 3)
valaise
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Thanks for understanding! And apologies for the rash revert (wanted to avoid further conflicts in case additional park details were being added today).

Appreciate your help in adding amenity details to these parks, as I hadn't been able t...
commented 2025-10-29 20:10:44 UTC by MapSpot ♦97
173941642
(Comments: 1)
GiaJae-SSB AG
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Revert, dieses wegstück war korrekt und ist nicht das Problem!

Hallo GiaJae-SSB AG, willkommen bei OSM. Das "Problem" ist die unechte Einbahnstraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267202178/history in Höhe der Halte...
commented 2025-10-29 20:08:14 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,354
173944302
(Comments: 4)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Yeah, removing existing Polish names (which are correct) is definitely wrong. Especially with no source provided
commented 2025-10-29 19:53:26 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
173930214
(Comments: 1)
Damian Kowalczyk
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085013157

Pozdrawiam!...
commented 2025-10-29 19:52:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173938802
(Comments: 1)
DanielRaz23
(Discussed changesets: 1)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być fo...
commented 2025-10-29 19:52:44 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173946099
(Comments: 1)
martien-176
(Discussed changesets: 37)
Lokale kennis
commented 2025-10-29 19:48:43 UTC by martien-176 ♦358
162982726
(Comments: 1)
Mateusz Konieczny
(Discussed changesets: 551)
Coś nie wyszedł ten rewert... Autor zmiany dosyć mętnie, ale napisał o co mu chodzi, albo raczej czego nie zrozumiał: miejscowość nazywa się Kamień, a to zapewne wersja w jakimś innym języku .
commented 2025-10-29 19:47:19 UTC by VA00 ♦606
173899169
(Comments: 2)
Kay Klotzsche
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Danke, das ändere ich noch so
commented 2025-10-29 19:33:11 UTC by Kay Klotzsche ♦2
173944070
(Comments: 1)
MapSpot
(Discussed changesets: 68)
Thank you!
commented 2025-10-29 19:27:17 UTC by valaise ♦17
169750230
(Comments: 1)
b-jazz-bot
(Discussed changesets: 76)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014294631
Такие объекты лучше обозначать тегом shop=trade
commented 2025-10-29 19:23:07 UTC by Vodevil_Mark ♦13
173918837
(Comments: 1)
theDM
(Discussed changesets: 125)
Tutaj w okolicy wiaduktu było dobrze z "use_sidepath", zmieniłeś źle na "yes":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192072352
Popraw to proszę
commented 2025-10-29 19:21:01 UTC by Szymson ♦421
173846561
(Comments: 3)
Torsten Holmer
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo,
brownfield dürfte in 90% aller Fälle begrünt sein - das hat nichts mit der Farbe bzw. der Oberfläche zu tun.
natural=grassland ist innerorts fast immer falsch.
landuse=grass wäre es, wenn es dauerhaft als nich...
commented 2025-10-29 19:20:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
168051793
(Comments: 1)
Seandebasti
(Discussed changesets: 102)
Hello. By chance I came across this tertiary road (185334981) and I notice 2 tags that maybe you wanted to put on the cycle path just below? The tertiary road (Via Martiri della Libertà) does not have any cycle lanes while Lungomare Cristoforo...
commented 2025-10-29 18:56:00 UTC by LucianoC63 ♦2
163053475
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 18:47:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173899882
(Comments: 2)
agarrett528
(Discussed changesets: 2)
thank you!
commented 2025-10-29 18:45:50 UTC by agarrett528 ♦1
160780525
(Comments: 3)
ITineris
(Discussed changesets: 70)
Nope. A DNY-i és ÉK-i Rákóczinak macisajtja van. Mint ahogyan mondtam, ma mentem át rajta autóval, és sem egyik, sem másik irányban nem egyezett a levezetett vonal a felvitt görb&uum...
commented 2025-10-29 18:45:12 UTC by balint36 ♦214
163099037
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 18:45:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
163099359
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 18:38:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173898798
(Comments: 4)
Szymson
(Discussed changesets: 274)
"Po oddaniu całego węzła znaczenie wzrośnie." - to nie ma wpływu na aktualną ważność
commented 2025-10-29 18:33:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
156834765
(Comments: 2)
KDTW Flyer
(Discussed changesets: 9)
proceeding, got no response
commented 2025-10-29 18:25:30 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110
173939813
(Comments: 7)
BigRedPie
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Gracias a ti por la información. No conocía esa web que se chivaba de esas nuevas etiquetas usadas.
commented 2025-10-29 18:23:45 UTC by BigRedPie ♦2
163099778
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 18:23:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173932146
(Comments: 3)
Taurus3
(Discussed changesets: 26)
Daar is (helaas) geen consensus over. Zie ook https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/taggen-van-scholen-in-nl-naar-aanleiding-van-nieuwe-tag/93211
Ookwel, een van beide kan. Zelf ben ik voor landuse=education op het vlak en amenity=school op de adr...
commented 2025-10-29 18:21:20 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦28
163210431
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 18:18:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173922887
(Comments: 3)
Mateusz Konieczny
(Discussed changesets: 551)
proszę też wyjaśnij skąd się wzięły nazwy w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969

jeśli tego nie zrobisz każda nazwa ...
commented 2025-10-29 18:15:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172476530
(Comments: 1)
Pooh01
(Discussed changesets: 23)
jak nie ma nawet projektu to za wcześnie na mapowanie

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173942506
commented 2025-10-29 18:01:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173937795
(Comments: 1)
antonella341
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hola Antonella341. ¿Puedes contarme que es lo que has querido modificar aquí, para poder mapearlo correctamente?
Por lo que veo, modificaste el área del edificio que antes estaba bien mapeado, según fotos satelitales. ...
commented 2025-10-29 17:57:39 UTC by mweper ♦427
173318382
(Comments: 2)
TommyRobloxOfficial
(Discussed changesets: 17)
Okej, dzięki za rade.
commented 2025-10-29 17:56:37 UTC by TommyRobloxOfficial ♦5
173904042
(Comments: 3)
NXN
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Ogólnie warto patrzeć na błędy, które walidatory edytora znajdują przed wysłaniem zmian, ale nie zawsze to co iD proponuje jest sensowne, prawidłowe, bądź konieczne.

Więc na to bym patrzył z przymrużeniem oka ;)
commented 2025-10-29 17:31:45 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158
173853417
(Comments: 2)
smaptious
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Hi user_5359,

Thanks for pointing this out. That tag was somehow inadvertently added to that grass polygon. I will go ahead and remove it.
commented 2025-10-29 17:27:02 UTC by smaptious ♦11
173917938
(Comments: 1)
MiroJanosik
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Ahoj,
prosim, oprav si nasledovne chyby:
1) z budovy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58927432 si odstranil tagy "ref:minvskaddress" a "source:addr". Nakolko budova stale existuje a adresa sa nezmenila, nie je dovod odmazat...
commented 2025-10-29 17:24:43 UTC by t_ja ♦217
173284351
(Comments: 1)
ithianm
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hola,

Veo que han continuado mi línea eléctrica desde la subestación de Santa Rosalía y que han encontrado una nueva subestación: Palestina.

No consigo ver esta subestación en las imágene...
commented 2025-10-29 17:24:19 UTC by nlehuby ♦113
173940145
(Comments: 2)
MAPPERAVG
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Ось приклад коментаря на основі ваших редагувань мапи: "Видалено номер будинку"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Remove...
commented 2025-10-29 17:16:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173908084
(Comments: 1)
jadynm
(Discussed changesets: 1)
#TIP: Add the flock device as a separate node. I look for the pole's shaddow to place the node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908084

commented 2025-10-29 17:09:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
173931202
(Comments: 2)
Jejko02
(Discussed changesets: 61)
Robisz koszmarne literówki w nazwach (o ile są one w ogóle prawdziwe) - popraw, proszę.
commented 2025-10-29 17:06:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173894148
(Comments: 1)
Yunan973
(Discussed changesets: 16)
Bonjour,
Les attributs addr:city=* et addr:postcode=* ne sont pas nécessaires. Extrait du wiki :

"Les attributs tels que addr:country=*, addr:city=* et addr:postcode=* sont en général redondantes pour un él&...
commented 2025-10-29 17:06:03 UTC by vincenttux ♦3
173898881
(Comments: 1)
Jerzy Jeżewski
(Discussed changesets: 10)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-29 17:05:04 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173900522
(Comments: 1)
bjnk954
(Discussed changesets: 23)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-29 17:04:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173918354
(Comments: 1)
bjnk954
(Discussed changesets: 23)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-29 17:04:20 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173865424
(Comments: 1)
Whattaflock
(Discussed changesets: 1)
#TIP: The device should be on a stand alone node not on a existing way. I look for the pole's shaddow to determine where to place the node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1...
commented 2025-10-29 16:59:24 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
173925883
(Comments: 1)
jesusdereinzigwahre28
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
die Änderung des Straßennamens und der Hausnummer widersprechen der Umgebung und ALKIS (Maarfeld -> Marfeld, Nr. 40 doppelt) und habe ich daher rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org...
commented 2025-10-29 16:58:06 UTC by aixbrick ♦868
168831516
(Comments: 1)
Anthuil
(Discussed changesets: 8)
bonjour, ce ne sont pas des pistes cyclables séparées. Cycleway= lane ds ce cas (piste cyclable marquée)
commented 2025-10-29 16:52:39 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15
173938743
(Comments: 1)
felipeeugenio
(Discussed changesets: 217)
Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment
5027170 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:38\tclosed\tok..
5027165 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:38\tclosed\tok..
5027172 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:38\tclosed\tok..
5027167 (iD...
commented 2025-10-29 16:40:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173937774
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi,
I noticed that this street is tagged as:
name=вулиця Івана Вакарчука
name:uk=вулиця Івана Вакарчука
name:pl=ulica Badenich
old_name:uk=вулиця Кіндрата Рилєєва

It ...
commented 2025-10-29 16:34:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173938374
(Comments: 1)
felipeeugenio
(Discussed changesets: 217)
Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment
5027153 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:28\tclosed\tok
5027156 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:27\tclosed\tok
5027163 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-10-29 17:27\tclosed\tok
5027157 (iD)\tfel...
commented 2025-10-29 16:32:14 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173937321
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi,
I noticed that this street is tagged as:
name=вулиця Сидора Голубовича
name:uk=вулиця Сидора Голубовича
name:en=Sydora Holubovycha Street
name:ru=Сидора Голубовича ули...
commented 2025-10-29 16:26:01 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173925930
(Comments: 2)
szabba
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Javítva itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173938040
commented 2025-10-29 16:25:35 UTC by infeeeee ♦596
173884690
(Comments: 5)
keichwa
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Die Dinge sollten jetzt im wesentlichen passen. Leider stimmt jetzt etwas mit den Relationen nicht (ich habe total vergessen, wie das ging...).
Eventuell muss der Service-Weg ums Gebaeude noch irgendwie private oder fuer Zulieferung getaggt werde...
commented 2025-10-29 16:24:26 UTC by keichwa ♦3
173937262
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hi,
I noticed that the street name was changed from "ulica Marko Wowczki" to "ulica Królowej Jadwigi".

Since this is a Polish street name in Ukraine, could you please confirm whether this change reflects an offic...
commented 2025-10-29 16:17:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173909035
(Comments: 4)
Flap Slimy Outward
(Discussed changesets: 91)
Well, Russia also held a "referendum" in those four oblasts (I put it in quotes because the international community views them as illegitimate). Also, just to clarify, Russia actually 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘥 them, not just occupied the...
commented 2025-10-29 15:54:46 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦118
173930834
(Comments: 1)
ממפהX
(Discussed changesets: 2)
שלום! גם כאן הוספתם בניין שחופף עם הבניין הקיים: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445992754


צריך לתקן את הבניין הקיים ולתייג אותו כמרפאה מאשר להוסיף ע...
commented 2025-10-29 15:52:07 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656
169664285
(Comments: 1)
ממפהX
(Discussed changesets: 2)
שלום ותודה על התרומה למפה. הבניין שהוספת חופף עם בניין קיים. אם מדובר בשתי נקודות עניין בבניין בודד, יש להוסיף אותן כ-points ולא כבניינים חופפ...
commented 2025-10-29 15:50:10 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656
173931914
(Comments: 1)
Agoraphilic
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Did this building get destroyed or the address removed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173931914

commented 2025-10-29 15:37:50 UTC by iandees ♦752
147033034
(Comments: 1)
Compositor
(Discussed changesets: 29)
בבקשה לתייג חסימה בהתאם. אם אתה יוצר נקודה בלי תגיות אף מפה לא מציגה אותה וחבל.
commented 2025-10-29 15:35:17 UTC by hatul ♦410
173707886
(Comments: 2)
MappingMore
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi Footsteps of Ancestors, thank you very much for acknowledging this. I’m glad to expand my knowledge and understanding and always happy to improve the map for all.
commented 2025-10-29 15:28:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦2
173786938
(Comments: 3)
SafwatHalaby
(Discussed changesets: 77)
עדכנתי ל-level=2 כאן: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173935602

בשינוי הקודם הנחתי שיש רק קומה אחת לפני הכניסה על סמך הדיווח

תודה :)
commented 2025-10-29 15:27:44 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656
173933902
(Comments: 1)
Fjarre
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Vänligen läs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names om användning av name-taggen.
"Vandringsled" m m är beskrivande namn som inte bör användas i osm enligt osm-wiki.
Vill du vara hygglig att ta bort ...
commented 2025-10-29 15:14:01 UTC by archie ♦1,355
172918008
(Comments: 3)
fuling09260524
(Discussed changesets: 3)
旧道路标签单行道与公交车双向通行是自相矛盾,单独表示已经是很符合现实的表现形式。物理独立意义不明。没有中央隔离带却双向分开表示的道路比比皆是
commented 2025-10-29 15:05:57 UTC by fuling09260524 ♦3
173923997
(Comments: 2)
MichaelFS
(Discussed changesets: 49)
Hallo,

Danke, hatte die Nummer im www recherchiert. Inzwisvchen hat ein anderer User das auf "moblie" geändert. Falls noch etwas fehlt, gib mir bitte Bescheid..
commented 2025-10-29 15:05:15 UTC by MichaelFS ♦62
172181852
(Comments: 1)
PèreForez
(Discussed changesets: 25)
Bonjour PèreForez, je ne comprends pas ce que vous avez souhaité faire ici. J'ai visité ce site il y a 6 mois et il est possible que cela ait changé. Si ce n'est pas le cas, la plaque que vous avez retirée...
commented 2025-10-29 15:00:11 UTC by divaddivag ♦122
173786438
(Comments: 2)
BudgieInWA
(Discussed changesets: 11)
I wasn't precisely sure, so I was going for the generic "Australian Aboriginal", which is actually spelled "name:aus" as it turns out.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australia%27s_Fir...
commented 2025-10-29 14:59:33 UTC by BudgieInWA ♦29
173629525
(Comments: 2)
lenny25
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Sorry, ich habe nur die Anzahl der Bügel gezählt! Ich wusste nicht, dass die Info schon vorhanden war - in der StreetComplete App wurde mir das als Aufgabe angezeigt. Ich habe meine Änderungen wieder rückgängig gemacht:
ht...
commented 2025-10-29 14:57:10 UTC by lenny25 ♦1
164294437
(Comments: 1)
MHD
(Discussed changesets: 27)
Hi, das Schützenheim ist auf aktuellen Luftbilder nicht zu sehen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165743349

Grüße
Chris
commented 2025-10-29 14:40:43 UTC by chris66 ♦413
173933259
(Comments: 1)
Himké
(Discussed changesets: 77)
Use highway=corridor and indoor=yes for pedways within buildings; highway=footway and covered=yes for pedways outside buildings
commented 2025-10-29 14:36:31 UTC by Himké ♦75
173915551
(Comments: 1)
PRIMAstmp25
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hola, cambio la abrebiación "C/..." por los respectivos Calle o Carrer según corresponda en la zona. Tienes más info aquí:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not)
commented 2025-10-29 14:29:03 UTC by aTarom ♦824
173931822
(Comments: 1)
TinPetreković
(Discussed changesets: 163)
According to the official source the road should be part of the National Netowrk, however the abundance of signs that state it is prohibited for trucks makes the National Network tags on that road incorrect #OptimoRoute
commented 2025-10-29 14:01:38 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178
173691235
(Comments: 1)
Marek-M
(Discussed changesets: 165)
Nie wiem co miałeś na celu zmieniając łuki dróg na kanciaste. Przywróciłem poprzednią, dokładniejszą geometrię.
commented 2025-10-29 13:52:27 UTC by YomanNH ♦387
173691344
(Comments: 1)
Marek-M
(Discussed changesets: 165)
Nie wiem co miałeś na celu zmieniając łuki dróg na kanciaste. Przywróciłem poprzednią, dokładniejszą geometrię.
commented 2025-10-29 13:52:24 UTC by YomanNH ♦387
173876901
(Comments: 2)
pan_borsuk
(Discussed changesets: 72)
dziękuje Krabie.

już widzę co dałem za dużo

poszedłem na łatwiznę i aaplikowałem tym dwum domom..punkt adresowy instead :-)

pozdr z małopolski
commented 2025-10-29 13:52:16 UTC by pan_borsuk ♦61
171703944
(Comments: 2)
Agadzi Seth
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi again.
The reason you added a layer to this building was wrong. This building, like many other tall (high) buildings are not placed on their footprint. This is the place where the building meets the ground.

Keep an eye on complex buildi...
commented 2025-10-29 13:51:57 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
173817748
(Comments: 2)
seateaeye
(Discussed changesets: 10)
I think I just wasn't careful while editing, thanks for noticing this and correcting it.
commented 2025-10-29 13:44:55 UTC by seateaeye ♦4
71378159
(Comments: 1)
jpl-brz
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour, concernant
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698091053#map=16/48.66729/-4.32705
et
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698091054#map=16/48.66729/-4.32705
ces cheminements ne sont pas nommés.
Voir n'existent pas vra...
commented 2025-10-29 13:39:51 UTC by trial ♦957
145269578
(Comments: 3)
Matheus Moreira CE
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello Matheus,
thanks for answering.
I think, the new 1600 mm railway should be named "Nova Transnordestina", while the old 1000 mm could be "FV Transnordestina" to make it easier to separate them.
Btw... do You have sour...
commented 2025-10-29 13:36:58 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦38
173481478
(Comments: 7)
heliigamt
(Discussed changesets: 5)
So a la
"Ich verstehe, dass es mühsam ist, unerwünschten Menschen hier hinterher-aufzuräumen, wenn der Grillplatz privat ist.
In den OpenStreetMap-Daten gilt aber der Grundsatz, dass etwas, das in der Realität existiert...
commented 2025-10-29 13:23:19 UTC by habi ♦1,938
116885614
(Comments: 1)
sykul
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Hello
I have removed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173926066

It was only ever a proposal yet you made no mention of this in the changeset description and tagged it as an active area causing issues for data users.

Ad...
commented 2025-10-29 13:20:51 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,402
173906819
(Comments: 1)
David L Hill
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Just a heads up, if there's no lane lines, then lane_markings=no should be used, not lanes=2.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173906819

commented 2025-10-29 13:19:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173929628
(Comments: 1)
floppa
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Cześć

historyczne nazwy dodajemy w znaczniku old_name:pl, nie w name:pl
commented 2025-10-29 13:18:40 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
173921295
(Comments: 3)
chriscolemanallstateinsurance
(Discussed changesets: 1)
The description tag, or anywhere else in OSM, is a wholly inappropriate venue for ad copy.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173921295

commented 2025-10-29 13:17:57 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173921828
(Comments: 2)
camilleMa
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido.
commented 2025-10-29 13:14:46 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112
173922288
(Comments: 2)
camilleMa
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido.
commented 2025-10-29 13:14:39 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112
173922434
(Comments: 2)
camilleMa
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido.
commented 2025-10-29 13:14:31 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112
173656347
(Comments: 1)
heliigamt
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Lieber Mensch vom heliigamt
Der Grillplatz existiert 'on the ground', deshalb ist deine Löschung hier sinnlos, jeder Beitragende in OSM kann diesen deshalb wieder eintragen.
Es ist viel besser, den Grillplatz mit den korrekten Zu...
commented 2025-10-29 13:14:04 UTC by habi ♦1,938
173928756
(Comments: 1)
Bakuvian
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Salam, "Bing Maps"-i referans aldığınızı gördüm. Daha iç küçələr və ya parklar üçün "Esri World Imagery" işlədə bilərsiniz, görüntüləri daha yeni və keyfiy...
commented 2025-10-29 13:13:45 UTC by alikiso ♦1
173656318
(Comments: 1)
heliigamt
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Wir können das beliebig lange machen...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173929313
commented 2025-10-29 13:10:42 UTC by habi ♦1,938
173904783
(Comments: 2)
sundew
(Discussed changesets: 47)
Hallo,
also postal_code=29664 ist eigentlich das Richtige laut Packstation-Mappingschema. Hast du aber wieder entfernt.
Packstationen haben keine eigene Adresse, sondern nur eine offizielle Referenzadresse. Also wäre alternativ ref:addr:p...
commented 2025-10-29 13:09:23 UTC by sundew ♦75
173928024
(Comments: 1)
Janvdberg48
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Je commentaar is Locatie Crevecoeur gecentreed . In werkelijkheid heb je de naam verwijderd?
Je edits https://ov...
commented 2025-10-29 13:08:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173927592
(Comments: 2)
Maschambe
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Tres temas con esta edición:
1) escribimos con capitalización normal, no en mayúsculas. Además por favor cuidar la ortografía.
2) el tag building es para estructuras, no para el recinto completo.
3) ojo por...
commented 2025-10-29 13:04:07 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173927246
(Comments: 1)
Maschambe
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Por favor no borrar elementos solo porque están mal ubicados. Pueden trasladarse. Además la posta no es un hospital. Voy a corregirlo.

En todo caso muchas gracias por su tiempo y aportes.Estos err...
commented 2025-10-29 13:00:05 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173928471
(Comments: 1)
TinPetreković
(Discussed changesets: 163)
The node was accidentally created and it was deleted in changeset 173928592 since it served no purpose

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173928592
commented 2025-10-29 12:58:39 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178
173838066
(Comments: 4)
akino_germany
(Discussed changesets: 21)
Hm, die Beschreibung für water_park ist schon sehr "Erlebnisbad! Alles voller Rutschen und Wellenbecken!". Ich hätte schon lieber gerne einen Tag zwischen Erlebnisbad und Sportschwimmen, für Bäder die keine Becken haben ...
commented 2025-10-29 12:55:24 UTC by akino_germany ♦20
173925905
(Comments: 1)
Ansofter
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Angelegte Sackgassen wurden von mir falsch verwendet (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing).
commented 2025-10-29 12:51:47 UTC by Ansofter ♦4
173927062
(Comments: 1)
Ansofter
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Angelegte Sackgassen wurden von mir falsch verwendet (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing). Entsprechend wurden ungerechtfertigte Sackgassen in #173928290 wieder entfernt.
commented 2025-10-29 12:51:32 UTC by Ansofter ♦4
172259037
(Comments: 2)
LeuvenNeedsTrams2
(Discussed changesets: 4)
(See changeset 173928274 for my proposed update)
commented 2025-10-29 12:51:25 UTC by djsa ♦22
173923506
(Comments: 1)
SinsBird
(Discussed changesets: 1)
O kodėl buvo pakeistos kelių klasifikacijos? Viskas su jomis buvo gerai. Dabartinis variantas visiškai blogas. Aš atšauksiu visą šitą pakeitimą.
commented 2025-10-29 12:45:22 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,990
173762027
(Comments: 3)
Thomas-Munichways
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Was ich gesehen habe sieht gut aus.
commented 2025-10-29 12:44:57 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
170922742
(Comments: 1)
GJanis
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, thank you for your contributions. I was asked to verify name changes. Bing Maps indicates that the extension of the street, until Dreef, is calle Kerkplein. It would make sense, surrounding completely the St-Gertrudiskerk.
Could you provide a...
commented 2025-10-29 12:40:39 UTC by VLD549 ♦307
173927722
(Comments: 1)
ENGELBERT MODO
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Good job MODO
commented 2025-10-29 12:39:44 UTC by ENGELBERT MODO ♦10
173899234
(Comments: 1)
CowCowManThingit
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Reverted fictional edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173927529
commented 2025-10-29 12:33:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463
76037675
(Comments: 1)
Eric Bie
(Discussed changesets: 56)
Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9165888/history/6 était correctement nommé, la version non conforme était dans official_name, pourquoi avoir changé name ?
commented 2025-10-29 12:29:52 UTC by trial ♦957
173399222
(Comments: 1)
Zenfiric
(Discussed changesets: 118)
Да ли желимо да назив буде 'Римокатоличка црква Свете Ане' или само 'Црква Свете Ане'?

Пошто тренутно имамо један назив у '...
commented 2025-10-29 12:16:18 UTC by MaliMrav ♦53
173925130
(Comments: 2)
bilge525
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added water basin with intermittent feature, named Kızıksuyu"
commented 2025-10-29 11:46:33 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
169926149
(Comments: 2)
Derkades
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Simply removing the speed limit is wrong, you have to update it to current value. If there is no speed limit maxspeed=none is to be set. And if you've driven there on the 2nd of August 2025 there must have been signs, not 80 but 120.
2025-07-...
commented 2025-10-29 11:30:00 UTC by tvbrene ♦23
173879059
(Comments: 2)
sys3175
(Discussed changesets: 1)
It's still a visible cutline (no trees,only grass and little shrubs), but no longer a firebreak because the railway has been removed. - Of course, one could remove the tag completely. I kept it to show the history...
commented 2025-10-29 11:27:06 UTC by sys3175 ♦1
173867547
(Comments: 3)
cicciobisticcio
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Il guaio sono quei percorsi a catasto "rilevati" da un professionista che dopo 10-15 anni scopri essere non transitabili.
Ti ringrazio della segnalazione, provvedo a inviare il problema a chi se ne deve occupare.

Ivo
commented 2025-10-29 11:25:52 UTC by Jrachi ♦798
159653544
(Comments: 4)
gymko
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Ďakujem
commented 2025-10-29 11:24:55 UTC by gymko ♦22
173787536
(Comments: 1)
GanderPL
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Hi,
"hazard:flammable_gas" is not a common tag. Is there a ban for gas-fueled vehicles here? That's often tagged as "access:fuel:lpg=no"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13257381979
commented 2025-10-29 11:22:48 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
172149710
(Comments: 5)
rhhs
(Discussed changesets: 65)
Мерси за линка, там открих amenity=canteen, което изглежда най-точно.
commented 2025-10-29 11:09:41 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦727
173922733
(Comments: 1)
Aartsie
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Dag Aartsie..]

review_requested \tyes

Lijkt me oke zo.

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-29 11:09:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
135727984
(Comments: 4)
stadt-Due-Lengsfeld
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo limes11,
da der entsprechende Sachbearbeiter nicht bei OSM registriert ist, leite ich Ihnen seine Antwort weiter:
Der im Plan gekennzeichnete Weg ist ein privater Weg, der einzig der Erschließung der landwirtschaftlichen Fläche...
commented 2025-10-29 10:54:58 UTC by stadt-Due-Lengsfeld ♦2
163256908
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 10:52:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173884191
(Comments: 2)
Denis_Helfer
(Discussed changesets: 71)
mistyping of course
correction is ongoing
Thanks for your survey
commented 2025-10-29 10:44:31 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦97
33455089
(Comments: 1)
Bayu Adi Styawan
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/366614886. What is the mean of the tag M:flood_prone = no ?
commented 2025-10-29 10:31:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173921825
(Comments: 2)
TA Hale
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Van Zandt County community location"
commented 2025-10-29 10:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173279132
(Comments: 3)
Fabienamnet
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Ok, merci
Je vais explorer les docs BANO/pifomètre pour voir comment tagguer cela au mieux
commented 2025-10-29 10:26:07 UTC by BrunoC ♦4
173873296
(Comments: 1)
Volkmar Glauche
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Der Outfit Laden hat nichts mit der englischen Kette zu tun (die Laut verlinktem wiki auch nicht mehr existiert)
sondern wird von "Vereinigung Freiburger Sozialarbeit e.V." getragen

https://www.vfs-ev.de/kleiderladen-outfit/outfit...
commented 2025-10-29 10:22:15 UTC by Hannes0815 ♦1
173116971
(Comments: 1)
reformer_splicing696
(Discussed changesets: 1)
bonjour, une piste cyclable marquée n epeut pas être considérée et encodée comme une piste cyclable (indépendante de la voirie). Il faudrait mettre un attribut à la voirie avec bdande cyclable ordinaire...
commented 2025-10-29 10:12:19 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15
162323540
(Comments: 2)
Vassilis Chryssos
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Ευχαριστώ για το σχόλιο! Δεν το είχα παρατηρήσε&io...
commented 2025-10-29 10:09:42 UTC by Vassilis Chryssos ♦4
163736196
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 10:01:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173720936
(Comments: 1)
MMaarrttiinn
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Der Eigenname ist völlig falsch. Das mit dem Augustinerchorherrenstift gilt für die Infotafel auf der anderen Straßenseite. Bitte erstmal genauer informieren, bevor man mit StreetComplete in OSM Fehler reinbringt. Ich habe es eben zur...
commented 2025-10-29 10:01:39 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦137
173917428
(Comments: 4)
hrnylmz
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Da's mooi... Dan had de verbinding even de hik. Ik heb nog wel de format phone aangepast naar +31 ...
MVG
egie
commented 2025-10-29 10:01:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
163747822
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 10:00:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173896769
(Comments: 5)
Pascougnou
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Voilà, c'est fait.
Bonne journée et bonne continuation sur OSM ;-)
commented 2025-10-29 09:59:49 UTC by bazgal ♦18
163763652
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 09:59:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173843889
(Comments: 1)
ZebraLisa
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hey Lisa
Das Gebäude heisst schon seit 10 Jahren Zebrabox in OpenStreetMap.
Du hast das hier dupliziert, und der Account Sandra_ste hat dem Gebäude vor einer Woche alle Zebrabox-Werte vergeben.
Ist die Zebrabox im *ganzen* Geba&aum...
commented 2025-10-29 09:55:49 UTC by habi ♦1,938
173895178
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 09:55:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173854823
(Comments: 3)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
dodatkowo: jaka jest licencja Kajakiem Po Wodach Pomorza Zachodniego Część Połudnowa i Zachodnia rok 1974?

I zwłaszcza "Atlas Polskich Rzek"? Nie możemy kopiować z innych map, poza niewielkimi wyjątkami
commented 2025-10-29 09:55:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173918652
(Comments: 1)
WKB69
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OSM,
Het cafe stond al vermeld in OSM. Alle info heb ik nu samengevoegd in de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-29 09:54:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173898748
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 09:53:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173861164
(Comments: 1)
JJIglesias
(Discussed changesets: 130)
Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13264075032. Is this really a description or rather a reference number for administrative classification?
commented 2025-10-29 09:53:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
163765948
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered...
commented 2025-10-29 09:38:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173916547
(Comments: 1)
nlogidzon68
(Discussed changesets: 3)
This changeset appears to follow a pattern of vandalism similar to previous incidents affecting the same map elements, which were also reverted.

I would therefore appreciate it if other members of the community could review this changeset as w...
commented 2025-10-29 09:38:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173916616
(Comments: 1)
nlogidzon68
(Discussed changesets: 3)
This changeset appears to follow a pattern of vandalism similar to previous incidents affecting the same map elements, which were also reverted.

I would therefore appreciate it if other members of the community could review this changeset as w...
commented 2025-10-29 09:37:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
165754924
(Comments: 2)
Raymond
(Discussed changesets: 26)
Hier ein Vorschlag für das Tagging des Tunnels: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline
Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-29 09:24:33 UTC by hsimpson ♦142
167801045
(Comments: 4)
Zrop
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Hab gerade gesehen, dass ich das an das falsche CS angehängt habe. Sorry dafür.
commented 2025-10-29 09:21:31 UTC by hsimpson ♦142
173917963
(Comments: 2)
planetjane0
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Cannabis dispensary in Ypsilanti Michigan"
commented 2025-10-29 09:09:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173917048
(Comments: 1)
Alessandro Aldè
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Ciao Alessandro Aldè, "DINAclub - Stazione di Ricarica e-Bike" è nome descrittivo.

brand=Repower
network=Dina club
operator=Repower
operator:wikidata=Q674712
website=https://www.repower.com/it
commented 2025-10-29 09:07:49 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦318
173857878
(Comments: 1)
Gianluck Pastor
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Why did you overpaint a existing street? I remove your first change set.
commented 2025-10-29 09:07:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173805698
(Comments: 3)
Traffikant
(Discussed changesets: 6)
z.B. bei Taginfo nach dem richtigen Wort suchen und ähnliche Tags anzeigen lassen.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/separation#similar

Dann einen auswählen und rechts oben auf Overpass Turbo klicken.

commented 2025-10-29 09:03:22 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
173914915
(Comments: 7)
PWestenberg
(Discussed changesets: 4)
.. access=private routeert niet.. want Verboden Toegang.
.. access=customers routeert ook niet.

.. access=permissive routeert wel. Het een tag voor Eigen Weg.
De eigenaar kan iemand te allen tijde de toegang ontzeggen. De wegenverkeersw...
commented 2025-10-29 08:57:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173879140
(Comments: 1)
NBMAnjoutourisme
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Ça fait serré pour mettre trois restaurants dans ce bâtiment. Êtes-vous sûr(e) que ce restaurant ne replace pas plutôt l’un des deux déjà cartographiés ?
commented 2025-10-29 08:50:54 UTC by Ltrlg ♦79
173914972
(Comments: 4)
PWestenberg
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Aan die afrastering (fence) hoef je niets te doen. Dat speelt geen rol in de routering.
Dus geen accesstags toevoegen. Alleen aan de poorten (gate) zelf.

commented 2025-10-29 08:37:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173915074
(Comments: 3)
PWestenberg
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Oke.. maar het hek zit niet aan een wegdeel vast en zal dus niets doen.
De weg op het parkeerterrein staat op access=private. Al die toegangrechten op het hek dat wel aan de weg vastzit hebben hier geen zin als de weg op private staat.

MVG<...
commented 2025-10-29 08:35:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173915016
(Comments: 1)
PWestenberg
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Dag PWesternberg Dit is een kruispunt name\t\tHaven 3108 zal niets doen in OSM.

MVG
eggoie
commented 2025-10-29 08:26:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173898679
(Comments: 7)
misterte
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Hallo Manuel,
natürlich hat dieser Eintrag an Bedeutung verloren. Das heißt aber umgekehrt nicht, dass "bridge:name=" völlig nutzlos ist. Ich komme aus der IT und arbeite täglich direkt mit OSM-Datenextrakten. Wenn i...
commented 2025-10-29 08:26:02 UTC by hmkaiser ♦57
173206386
(Comments: 1)
VerifiedUser916
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916553
commented 2025-10-29 08:25:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463
173206283
(Comments: 1)
VerifiedUser916
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916553
commented 2025-10-29 08:25:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463
172768921
(Comments: 1)
VerifiedUser916
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916535
commented 2025-10-29 08:24:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463
172768882
(Comments: 1)
VerifiedUser916
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531
commented 2025-10-29 08:24:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463
172768863
(Comments: 1)
VerifiedUser916
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531
commented 2025-10-29 08:24:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463
172768876
(Comments: 1)
VerifiedUser916
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531
commented 2025-10-29 08:24:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463
173903911
(Comments: 1)
dobbie-nl-\
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-29 08:11:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173896333
(Comments: 1)
ThomasVijf
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community



commented 2025-10-29 08:09:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173773061
(Comments: 1)
KikeTM
(Discussed changesets: 29)
Oye, ¿qué vas a hacer con todas esas carreteras sin señalizar?
commented 2025-10-29 08:01:49 UTC by Sandal man ♦396
173830829
(Comments: 2)
GemBer
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo eggie,
er zat een typefout in de straatnaam. Deze is aangepast. Terugmelding is niet nodig.
GemBer
commented 2025-10-29 08:00:15 UTC by GemBer ♦3
173793563
(Comments: 1)
leobass
(Discussed changesets: 14)
здравствуйте. Тут проект выложили https://roads.ru/forum/topic/29949-ulitsa-polyany-i-bartenevskaya-ul/?do=findComment&comment=867318

подумал, может, вам будет интересно обрис...
commented 2025-10-29 07:54:34 UTC by literan ♦6,844
173864458
(Comments: 1)
nitin gatkar
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Gajanan Maharaj temple malkhed bk ner Yavatmal Maharashtra 445102 call 9699185141
commented 2025-10-29 07:52:28 UTC by nitin gatkar ♦1
173559178
(Comments: 1)
panzaeron
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Moin panzeron,

bei Einbahnstraßen tragen wir nicht noch zusätzlich die Abbiegebschränkungen ein. Die ergeben sich bereits durch das oneway=yes.

Wenn Du Zeichen 267 als Punkt direkt auf den highway einträgst, denke b...
commented 2025-10-29 07:45:45 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦762
173885149
(Comments: 3)
informatique_geo4net
(Discussed changesets: 1)
The prefecture de Casablanca is indeed made of 2 communes, Commune de Casablanca and Commune du Méchouar de Casablanca, so it’s correct!
commented 2025-10-29 07:34:30 UTC by ilias_ ♦317
173881993
(Comments: 1)
PowerPan
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Fiktiver Name wird zurückgesetzt. Änderungen dieser Art können in OpenGeofiction erfolgen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173914542
commented 2025-10-29 07:23:04 UTC by kmpoppe_repair ♦470
156032699
(Comments: 2)
BardafFr
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Hello, c'est parce qu'elle est coupé en deux relation, celle en state active et celle en state proposed. Si tu affiche les deux ensemble, tu voie l'itinéraire complet.

la active : https://www.openstreetmap.org/rela...
commented 2025-10-29 07:19:58 UTC by BardafFr ♦10
173833549
(Comments: 1)
小阿喵喵
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Please be careful about how to mark a bridge. There must be two nodes(节点) on two sides to separate(分割) the line if you want to make a bridge, or the whole routh will be a LONG bridge.
Also be careful about how road intersections are made....
commented 2025-10-29 06:55:21 UTC by IAwAI ♦2
173831024
(Comments: 2)
MacDony
(Discussed changesets: 34)
Bonjour Marc,
Je corrige principalement la géométrie des segments de route, l'ajout ou le retrait de segments.
Je ne connais pas l'édition des Bus.
J'ai ajouté, comme je pensais, ces relations pour ...
commented 2025-10-29 06:55:00 UTC by MacDony ♦28
173908996
(Comments: 1)
shreyagandi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6481173570 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the node back to the original position.

commented 2025-10-29 06:52:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173911560
(Comments: 1)
Raven Scales
(Discussed changesets: 7)
#tt_event
commented 2025-10-29 06:52:24 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6
173911571
(Comments: 1)
Raven Scales
(Discussed changesets: 7)
#tt_event
commented 2025-10-29 06:52:08 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6
173911580
(Comments: 1)
Raven Scales
(Discussed changesets: 7)
#tt_event
commented 2025-10-29 06:51:53 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6
173911591
(Comments: 1)
Raven Scales
(Discussed changesets: 7)
#tt_event
commented 2025-10-29 06:51:39 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6
173911602
(Comments: 1)
Raven Scales
(Discussed changesets: 7)
#tt_event
commented 2025-10-29 06:51:10 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6
173911633
(Comments: 1)
Raven Scales
(Discussed changesets: 7)
#tt_event
commented 2025-10-29 06:50:42 UTC by Raven Scales ♦6
173909103
(Comments: 1)
william619
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Welcome to OSM! Please refrain from adding private information to OSM and thereby engaging in vandalism. If you want to make meaningful additions, please read the wiki article on addresses https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Addresses and enter them in your a...
commented 2025-10-29 06:35:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173885463
(Comments: 3)
geozeisig
(Discussed changesets: 325)
Hab die Verbindung 16-17 repariert. Beim Teilen eines ways scheint die Relation 16-17 verloren gegangen zu sein.
commented 2025-10-29 06:35:28 UTC by geozeisig ♦229
173878703
(Comments: 2)
aTarom
(Discussed changesets: 29)
Hello, could you please review my edit? I removed only the spaces because the phone number started with “+ 34…” and that space between the “+” and the “34” is not correct, so I just fixed that and check the ...
commented 2025-10-29 06:30:45 UTC by aTarom ♦824
172959196
(Comments: 5)
Вальдимар
(Discussed changesets: 126)
Hi. No, unfortunately I don't have any images
commented 2025-10-29 06:19:53 UTC by Вальдимар ♦12
172516538
(Comments: 3)
civ41
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Secondo me è meglio aggiungere note=* sulla strada e numeri civici, così se qualcuno passa non l'ho cambia secondo la scritta sul cartello.
commented 2025-10-29 06:19:50 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦318
173909073
(Comments: 1)
william619
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description.
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.

commented 2025-10-29 06:19:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
172903227
(Comments: 1)
ElmerOSM
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know.
commented 2025-10-29 06:11:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
116960939
(Comments: 1)
Ramesh kumar TN
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know.
commented 2025-10-29 06:06:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
123555068
(Comments: 1)
QASIM_KAZMI
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use. If there's some reason why you think this is a valid use of the tag please let me know.
commented 2025-10-29 06:06:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173357077
(Comments: 1)
kaykhine
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Thank you for mapping. I noticed you added many villages. It's worth noting that if a village has fewer than 30-40 households, it should be tagged as a hamlet. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=hamlet)
commented 2025-10-29 05:46:27 UTC by DetectiveConan ♦15
173472648
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-29 05:07:06 UTC by rboda ♦13
173472409
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-29 05:05:34 UTC by rboda ♦13
173474708
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-29 04:38:02 UTC by rboda ♦13
173477259
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-29 04:22:13 UTC by rboda ♦13
173473421
(Comments: 3)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-29 04:19:57 UTC by rboda ♦13
173472967
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
commented 2025-10-29 04:14:41 UTC by rboda ♦13
173909172
(Comments: 1)
TornadoKegan
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, why did you delete the buildings rather than updating the geometry of the building?
commented 2025-10-29 04:12:51 UTC by QuiLe ♦2
172437773
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-29 04:03:38 UTC by rboda ♦13
173602916
(Comments: 2)
Jessica Irvine
(Discussed changesets: 1)
When mapping building footprints consider that you are looking at the roofs which may have stains making it appear as thogh their shape is different.
commented 2025-10-29 03:59:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173804173
(Comments: 1)
Lauragzf
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:56:18 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
172948409
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-29 03:53:15 UTC by rboda ♦13
171037983
(Comments: 1)
KennethArthur
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:52:16 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
171998079
(Comments: 1)
Magar Sushma
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:51:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173861963
(Comments: 1)
TriangleMaple
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Additional sources alongside the survey:

https://burnaby.widen.net/s/mmjwrxv6pm/metrotown-downtown-plan

Map on page 49/165 of the pdf, If you count the numbers on the bottom of the pdf, it's page 37

Land is marked for open-s...
commented 2025-10-29 03:50:36 UTC by TriangleMaple ♦4
172713218
(Comments: 1)
Hung159
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Hello, I want to tell you something about your edits on bridges and tunnels.

I saw you've changed 'name' tag to bridge or tunnel's name. However, some of your edits were not seemed to be appropriate. Because the 'highw...
commented 2025-10-29 03:50:36 UTC by aaei924 ♦28
173675583
(Comments: 1)
NataliaM2101
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:50:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173585383
(Comments: 1)
dusziv
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hi, I appreciate you improving the geometry of a few of the buildings here, but the middle footprint appears to envelope multiple buildings, the rightmost feature looks to be a field, the layer tag was not removed from the smallest building, and the ...
commented 2025-10-29 03:47:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173704166
(Comments: 2)
ElmerOSM
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hi, thanks for moving the footprint you added to try and place it at the base of the building though it should have been moved slightly further north and east to achieve this. You correctly recognised and deleted roof furniture, but the building foot...
commented 2025-10-29 03:43:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
158725253
(Comments: 2)
radiotrefoil
(Discussed changesets: 54)
Hi, sorry if it wasn't clear, the fixme tag is a request to add a missing ref. NBN nodes usually have a ref like "2KTB-03-05-FNO-001" or so. Needs to be surveyed in person
commented 2025-10-29 03:37:41 UTC by radiotrefoil ♦115
173257307
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
commented 2025-10-29 03:31:16 UTC by rboda ♦13
173579355
(Comments: 1)
Amy Armstrong
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:24:25 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173667408
(Comments: 1)
!auge
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:23:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173691730
(Comments: 1)
Sam Bedekar
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:23:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173720467
(Comments: 1)
amaechijac
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:22:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173563756
(Comments: 1)
Rubi Shrestha
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:21:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173765585
(Comments: 1)
Puntertje
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag to resolve data overlaps here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand the use of this tag.
commented 2025-10-29 03:20:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173667887
(Comments: 1)
Juan Carlos Gonzalez Aguilar
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand the tag.
commented 2025-10-29 03:15:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
171711623
(Comments: 1)
biscuits_n_jam
(Discussed changesets: 1)
hi, it looks like you added an invlaid layer tag here please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand this tag.
commented 2025-10-29 03:13:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173610105
(Comments: 1)
CollinsNdegwa
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you inappropriately added a layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
commented 2025-10-29 03:11:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
172510100
(Comments: 1)
Andreea Tulvan
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to understand the use of the layer tag.
commented 2025-10-29 03:07:11 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173163856
(Comments: 2)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-29 03:04:22 UTC by rboda ♦13
173679014
(Comments: 1)
Adeel B
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, it looks like you identified buildings in imagery, but didn't map them as accuratlely as the imagery allows. Just so you know it is unnecessary to add an area tag to building footprints as that is assumed to be the case. Layer tags are mostc...
commented 2025-10-29 03:04:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173860917
(Comments: 1)
J00SECI
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la o...
commented 2025-10-29 02:46:09 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦114
173861062
(Comments: 1)
J00SECI
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la o...
commented 2025-10-29 02:45:50 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦114
173861369
(Comments: 1)
J00SECI
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la o...
commented 2025-10-29 02:45:24 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦114
173882832
(Comments: 1)
@Muneebafzal
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003899336/history/29). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/change...
commented 2025-10-29 01:15:39 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64
173905621
(Comments: 2)
LordGarySugar
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Thank you, I dedicate my work to my loyal fans, all (0) 235 of them
commented 2025-10-29 01:12:33 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦108
173892734
(Comments: 2)
Anrijs Terauds
(Discussed changesets: 81)
building:part=yes
commented 2025-10-29 00:47:51 UTC by Anrijs Terauds ♦50
173906216
(Comments: 1)
TheRandomGamrTRG
(Discussed changesets: 2)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-cornwall-on-open-data/136048
commented 2025-10-29 00:38:41 UTC by TheRandomGamrTRG ♦2
173906212
(Comments: 1)
TheRandomGamrTRG
(Discussed changesets: 2)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-cornwall-on-open-data/136048
commented 2025-10-29 00:38:25 UTC by TheRandomGamrTRG ♦2
173880637
(Comments: 2)
bryanf__
(Discussed changesets: 6)
because of this I've reverted this change.
commented 2025-10-28 23:53:40 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
171387250
(Comments: 1)
osm-pt-account 😎
(Discussed changesets: 73)
What was your motivation to change the tracks between Bonifatiuskirche and Käfertal Bahnhof from railway=narrow_gauge to railway=tram? Having this inconsistent between both tracks of the same operational line doesn't make sense. This is als...
commented 2025-10-28 23:45:05 UTC by networkException ♦1
173881961
(Comments: 1)
bryanf__
(Discussed changesets: 6)
I've reverted this changeset since the history of the original way should have been retained https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

It's likely that the water tank is sitting under the eaves and the buildi...
commented 2025-10-28 23:40:56 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173882115
(Comments: 1)
bryanf__
(Discussed changesets: 6)
I've reverted this change since the history of the way should have been retained per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

(ie. instead of deleting the building and adding a new one, you could just edit the ex...
commented 2025-10-28 23:33:01 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173903520
(Comments: 2)
Ol'Dirty
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18878
commented 2025-10-28 23:13:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029
173904993
(Comments: 1)
neo-plan
(Discussed changesets: 173)
Участок будет только от МКАД до монастыря, а не как нарисовано сейчас. Проектный вариант - мастабный, с развязками, вернул на карте в преж...
commented 2025-10-28 22:53:37 UTC by neo-plan ♦104
173841679
(Comments: 3)
最好的智乃酱
(Discussed changesets: 1)
若使用iD编辑器绘图,选中铁路轨道线段,在左侧“编辑要素”栏中向下滑动,展开“标签”。你会看到一张表格,其中既有的"maxspeed"值会与上方填写的“限制速度&rdq...
commented 2025-10-28 22:49:35 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦16
173895726
(Comments: 1)
Glassman
(Discussed changesets: 71)
Please try and use descriptive changeset comments and avoid acronyms and made up words. OSM is a multilingual project, it is mean to exclude people based on their heritage.
---

Published using OSMCha: htt...
commented 2025-10-28 22:36:34 UTC by EqualBoat1886 ♦5
173877282
(Comments: 1)
pan_borsuk
(Discussed changesets: 72)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445740144

Pozdrawiam!...
commented 2025-10-28 22:33:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173881862
(Comments: 8)
czecko
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s...
commented 2025-10-28 22:33:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
114577565
(Comments: 2)
ortho_is_hot
(Discussed changesets: 53)
? Looks like you might be correct.. must be somewhat confusing
Been putting 686 back into sequential order...
commented 2025-10-28 22:31:00 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,679
173893629
(Comments: 1)
bohbrat
(Discussed changesets: 1)
The "Q" key in the web editor can square those corners for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173893629

commented 2025-10-28 21:48:27 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173898759
(Comments: 3)
adrgru
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Ja, mit diesem "Problem" mussten wir uns im Rahmen unseres Parkraumprojekts schon sehr oft auseinandersetzen, da diese Art von informellem Parken in den Berliner Außenbezirken ein sehr häufiges Phänomen ist... Und die Rechts...
commented 2025-10-28 21:36:25 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦426
173903100
(Comments: 1)
Higashimado
(Discussed changesets: 4)
根据2025年新增的导流线标识,自强大道转盘附近不再允许掉头
commented 2025-10-28 21:29:24 UTC by Higashimado ♦5
173903042
(Comments: 1)
RafaBoski
(Discussed changesets: 35)
Obszar jest taki duży ze względu na to, że zaktualizowałem tagi LK131 do operator=PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. (tak, jak ode mnie wymagano)
commented 2025-10-28 21:27:07 UTC by RafaBoski ♦12
171027949
(Comments: 1)
GladGrip
(Discussed changesets: 4)
You've added "branch=York Station Loc" to the Sainsbos here but that's clearly rubbish due to data corruption in whatever fed their website at their end!
commented 2025-10-28 21:24:31 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485
173534457
(Comments: 1)
GladGrip
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hello,
You've moved the tags for "The Range" from the wider area to the building, but the forgets that the garden centre to the south is also part of the shop. To fix it it's probably easiest just to revert your edit.
Best ...
commented 2025-10-28 21:19:38 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485
173381448
(Comments: 2)
Openminded320
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Hallo,

ich habe die gelöschten Elemente wieder hergestellt.

@Openminded320: Bitte achte beim Mappen darauf, keine Dinge zu löschen, von denen du nicht sicher weißt, dass sie nicht mehr existieren.

Falls du Objekte...
commented 2025-10-28 21:15:12 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦426
173711856
(Comments: 1)
GladGrip
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hello,
You've updated the brand and brand:wikidata on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3270271462/history from "Go Outdoors Express" to "Go Outdoors". This is definitely a "Go Outdoors Express" not a "Go ...
commented 2025-10-28 21:12:10 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485
173884183
(Comments: 1)
bryanf__
(Discussed changesets: 6)
I've restored the deleted building and fixed the intersection.
commented 2025-10-28 21:05:11 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173826743
(Comments: 3)
pawel66031
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Można dać tag `change=no`, który zabrania zmiany pasa ruchu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change

Można od biedy zmapować obszar `area:highway=emergency`, który nie będzie się renderował i w zasadzie za wiele n...
commented 2025-10-28 21:01:27 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158
173899275
(Comments: 1)
Ol'Dirty
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hello,

This changeset has been identified as vandalism and has subsequently been reverted.

Please refer to the following wiki page on trails:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Thank you
commented 2025-10-28 20:59:44 UTC by eerib ♦207
173901744
(Comments: 1)
Ol'Dirty
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hello,

This changeset has been identified as vandalism and has subsequently been reverted.

Please refer to the following wiki page on trails:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Thank you
commented 2025-10-28 20:59:33 UTC by eerib ♦207
173173103
(Comments: 6)
Mario26mario
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Zmiana została wycofana, niestety zbyt dużo błędów.
commented 2025-10-28 20:57:13 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158
173845214
(Comments: 2)
Boske Barber Shop Rzeszów
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Wróć, do osobnego punktu miało być
commented 2025-10-28 20:56:39 UTC by bartgron ♦300
173844518
(Comments: 1)
Irina_ch
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello,
Please use the Square tool (right-click -> Square or press Q) to draw orthogonal shapes, I don't think those houses don't have 90 degree corners.
commented 2025-10-28 20:52:33 UTC by Buraddo ♦156
173886095
(Comments: 2)
Breezy50505
(Discussed changesets: 1)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
commented 2025-10-28 20:48:19 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173894126
(Comments: 1)
Omni Vigore
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi :)

freut mich, dass du so schnell auf meine Anmerkung reagierst.

Der Standort der Eiche sieht ganz gut aus, aber wenn ich hier gucke
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/3673911181
dann müsstest du nochmal an die Eige...
commented 2025-10-28 20:47:23 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
173901166
(Comments: 1)
solenoid jam
(Discussed changesets: 165)
Ошибка в комментарии к пакету
Род изменен наоборот с Cerasus на Prunus
commented 2025-10-28 20:44:29 UTC by solenoid jam ♦183
173882960
(Comments: 3)
keichwa
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :)

Wenn es der gleiche Raum ist, dann übernehmen wir den Punkt (node) für das neue Geschäft. Einfach die aktuellen Eigenschaften an den vorhandenen Punkt. Die Geschichte des Gesch&aum...
commented 2025-10-28 20:41:36 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
173886375
(Comments: 6)
theDM
(Discussed changesets: 125)
spoko, został mi odcinek na zachód od Leśnic do Słupska i za Słupskiem
commented 2025-10-28 20:34:01 UTC by theDM ♦142
173899625
(Comments: 1)
PW1996
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Dag PW..
Probeer als het kan bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Nu krijg je dubbele adressen.
Mvg..
eggie
commented 2025-10-28 20:32:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173756509
(Comments: 3)
Walter Łuszczyk
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Pytaj na forum - tam są specjaliści od takich tematów.
commented 2025-10-28 20:30:01 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173896943
(Comments: 2)
groen_sb
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Ok, dank voor de reactie. Bij buurt- en dorpshuizen zie je wel vaker meervoudig gebruik in multifunctionele accommodaties, vandaar de dubbele tag. Blijkbaar heeft dit gebouw niet (meer) de functie van ontmoetingsplek. Ik ben lokaal niet bekend dus za...
commented 2025-10-28 20:29:34 UTC by groen_sb ♦2
173892071
(Comments: 1)
SteMue
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Stimmt cycleway:both? Die letzten Mapillary-Bilder von Juni 2025 zeigen nur eine Radspur Richtung Norden.
commented 2025-10-28 20:29:32 UTC by eserte ♦157
173894387
(Comments: 1)
Playtri St Petersburg
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.

commented 2025-10-28 20:25:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173894752
(Comments: 1)
AbbyZzz
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! You changed a fottway to a bench (see https://www.osm.org/way/557849061). I must reverted your change set. Please try it again.
commented 2025-10-28 20:22:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
37319809
(Comments: 1)
gelltap
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Szent István-szoborra milyen forrásból lett artist_name=Raffay Béla?
commented 2025-10-28 20:20:10 UTC by ha5vsa ♦4
173898411
(Comments: 1)
Join Poland
(Discussed changesets: 1)
OpenStreetMap to nie miejsce na tekst reklamowy. Usuwam i zgłaszam.
commented 2025-10-28 20:20:08 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦402
173900601
(Comments: 3)
Bamgoodies
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ta description pourrait être : « entreprise d'impression et broderie sur textile à Riaz »
---
(Auto-translation)
commented 2025-10-28 20:15:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173898476
(Comments: 1)
jamesbmc
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please add the new information to the park area instead of adding an additional point to the park.
commented 2025-10-28 20:15:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173843795
(Comments: 1)
Mitzuc22
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please don't use the name tag for descriptions, it should be used only for proper names
commented 2025-10-28 20:14:42 UTC by Buraddo ♦156
173844526
(Comments: 1)
Suba Sabina
(Discussed changesets: 2)
the name tag should be used only for proper names, not for descriptions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173844526

commented 2025-10-28 20:13:01 UTC by Buraddo ♦156
173844032
(Comments: 1)
Suba Sabina
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello,
please be careful, you moved by mistake a node and merged it with a nearby road, see https://osmcha.org/changesets/173844032 for a visual representation of your edit. This can happen if you scroll around the map by mistake.
I fixed your ...
commented 2025-10-28 20:11:21 UTC by Buraddo ♦156
170864205
(Comments: 10)
parukhin
(Discussed changesets: 43)
Откатил, те, которые переименовал https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173900246
commented 2025-10-28 20:03:40 UTC by parukhin ♦156
173888497
(Comments: 1)
gabriel197
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello,
please be careful, you moved by mistake a road, see https://osmcha.org/changesets/173888497 for a visual representation of your edit
I reverted your changeset
commented 2025-10-28 20:00:49 UTC by Buraddo ♦156
173888315
(Comments: 1)
Flavius19
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello,
Please use the Square tool (right-click -> Square or press Q) to draw orthogonal shapes, I don't think those houses don't have 90 degree corners.
There is also a fork of the default editor which uses AI to draw buildings, yo...
commented 2025-10-28 19:59:11 UTC by Buraddo ♦156
173888036
(Comments: 1)
karolinaflorczyk
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173900138
commented 2025-10-28 19:58:56 UTC by bartgron ♦300
173888268
(Comments: 2)
DACIANZ
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Btw, there is a fork of the default editor which uses AI to draw buildings, you can give this tool to your class and make a much faster job: rapideditor.org
commented 2025-10-28 19:57:20 UTC by Buraddo ♦156
173852691
(Comments: 1)
LuGo91
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi,
the 2 areas mapped here are not horse riding centres (leisure=horse_riding), they are horse riding arenas and should be tagged like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223815764 (pitch + equestrian).
The horse riding centre here is probably ...
commented 2025-10-28 19:56:14 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦835
173888267
(Comments: 1)
m_to
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello,
please be careful, you moved by mistake a road, see https://osmcha.org/changesets/173888267 for a visual representation of your edit
I reverted your changeset
commented 2025-10-28 19:45:39 UTC by Buraddo ♦156
173892390
(Comments: 2)
anonymous123123
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hi! I understand your point and you are absolutely right. Highways or dual carriageways should have the same name in both directions for consistency, as that’s the standard in OSM. There is no need to assign different names. I have also correct...
commented 2025-10-28 19:38:05 UTC by anonymous123123 ♦3
170457331
(Comments: 1)
Redprintblueprint
(Discussed changesets: 1)
u are a bad person fuck u
commented 2025-10-28 19:36:09 UTC by CowCowManThingit ♦1
173898286
(Comments: 1)
Ezra Edwards
(Discussed changesets: 7)
nice work updating the road network in kpk — it’s great to see live geodata enhancements at work. this kind of map edit powers smarter routing and better location-based services for developers and users alike. for more digital tools and m...
commented 2025-10-28 19:31:21 UTC by Nandre Burger ♦1
173794058
(Comments: 2)
Idris Nazh
(Discussed changesets: 1)
3. При переименовании улицы нужно менять не только name, но и name:ru.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781717815

Ошибки с отсутствием статусной части продол...
commented 2025-10-28 19:29:53 UTC by Grass-snake ♦245
173624315
(Comments: 1)
mmorec
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hello mmorec,

I see you have reclassified Avenida Regimiento 13 de Caballería and the other main roads in Toay to primary. I would like to point out that according to OSM policy(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary)...
commented 2025-10-28 19:23:06 UTC by Aralqum ♦11
173891616
(Comments: 1)
Olyon
(Discussed changesets: 156)
merci!!! je me doutais bien que c'était possible.
commented 2025-10-28 19:16:56 UTC by benoitdd ♦80
173883261
(Comments: 1)
Kako00
(Discussed changesets: 1)
این مسیر یک جاده روستایی فرعیه و تگ "highway=unclassified" براش مناسب تره، لطفا آگاهانه و براساس واقعیت داده های نقشه رو ویرایش یا تکمیل کنید
commented 2025-10-28 19:15:10 UTC by AhmadHB ♦8
173892967
(Comments: 1)
anonymous123123
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Salut. De unde ai invetat tu numele pus invers la autostrada A1 Pitesti-Bucuresti? Atata vreme cat OFICIAl este Autostrada Bucuresti-Pitesti? Asa doar ca sa iasa o cacialma cand cautam pe gps ?
commented 2025-10-28 18:52:53 UTC by rarad74 ♦309
173894288
(Comments: 1)
KORAYREİS
(Discussed changesets: 7)
OpenStreetMap'te rules=* etiketi yok, eklediğiniz bilgileri eklemek için halihazırda başka etiketler var. "Yol boyunca duraklamak ve park etmek yasak" bilgisini nasıl ekleyebileceğiniz şurada anlatılmış: https://wiki.op...
commented 2025-10-28 18:34:22 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
173876870
(Comments: 2)
Linie29
(Discussed changesets: 74)
Das ist ein bisschen tricky weil es hier "Guntramsdorf-Kaiserau" und "Guntramsdorf-Kaiserau Haltestelle" gibt die auch unterschiedliche Betriebsstellenkürzel haben aber die selbe IBNR-Nummer. Wenn man da ganz genau ist mü...
commented 2025-10-28 18:25:06 UTC by Linie29 ♦43
82171642
(Comments: 2)
kapazao
(Discussed changesets: 69)
Hola Dani, es correcto lo que comentas y he procedido a corregir tanto el tipo de central como la producción. Estos datos fueron obtenidos de la Agencia Andaluza de la Energía como indiqué en el conjunto de cambios. No sé ...
commented 2025-10-28 18:18:11 UTC by kapazao ♦935
173873443
(Comments: 1)
jorafa051194
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hola jorafa,

Veo que para dibujar un muro, estás utilizando la etiqueta de "edificio" (building=yes), pero no es correcta.

Existe una etiqueta correcta para los muros: barrier=wall (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/T...
commented 2025-10-28 18:16:08 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,694
173895375
(Comments: 1)
KORAYREİS
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Merhaba. Tarafınıza bu konuda daha önce özel mesaj da gönderdim. Changeset'lerinize yorum da yazdım. Tüm değişikliklerinize "GERÇEK YER EKLENDİ" yazıyorsunuz. Lütfen changeset yorumlarınızda ne ...
commented 2025-10-28 18:14:58 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
173875167
(Comments: 1)
Rubenke
(Discussed changesets: 72)
Het label "bus=yes" op een highway betekent dat een bus er mag rijden. Het perron is echter bedoeld voor passagiers.
commented 2025-10-28 18:13:10 UTC by goedegazelle ♦244
X173893449
(Comments: 1)
blauloke
(Discussed changesets: 22)
please keep changesets to one continent
commented 2025-10-28 18:06:16 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
173031037
(Comments: 2)
Higashimado
(Discussed changesets: 4)
您好,已根据《广东省普通国道“十四五”规划建设项目示意图》修改,谢谢提醒
commented 2025-10-28 18:03:47 UTC by Higashimado ♦5
173885187
(Comments: 1)
alexpharrison
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello welcome to OSM. I wanted to to let you know, a feature being on private property is not a valid reason to remove it. If it exists on the ground it can be include in OSM. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

The ...
commented 2025-10-28 18:02:38 UTC by MassCartog ♦217
173887792
(Comments: 3)
WalkerB
(Discussed changesets: 6)
The issue is that you had 3 nodes in North America, and one in SE Asia
commented 2025-10-28 17:45:18 UTC by jjyach ♦35
173846244
(Comments: 2)
DeFra85
(Discussed changesets: 162)
Ah okay, perfekt, dank dir
commented 2025-10-28 17:44:27 UTC by DeFra85 ♦260
173862950
(Comments: 4)
rpoulsen47
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Nice! Thanks for finding that!
commented 2025-10-28 17:42:21 UTC by rpoulsen47 ♦1
173884879
(Comments: 1)
Blurry Kitteh
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi welcome to OSM. Looks like you are removing private roads. This is not correct. Private roads are valid to be mapped in OSM and should not be removed.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or a...
commented 2025-10-28 17:35:33 UTC by MassCartog ♦217
173885381
(Comments: 1)
Blurry Kitteh
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi welcome to OSM. Looks like you are removing private roads. This is not correct. Private roads are valid to be mapped in OSM and should not be removed.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or a...
commented 2025-10-28 17:35:22 UTC by MassCartog ♦217
173625388
(Comments: 7)
Endres Pelka
(Discussed changesets: 54)
dzięki @Spin za ten fix.
Ogólnie zastanawiam się na ile ewidencyjnie wiarygodne są te granice, ale to juz pytanie do ich autora wprowadzenia, no chyba, że się kiedys sami dowiemy.
commented 2025-10-28 17:17:30 UTC by Yog Sot ♦327
173887104
(Comments: 2)
ConnorGa
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hi Ion,

There's no wear pattern or anything indicating the existence of a footpath, informal or not, and pretty much all grass is traversable. I'm not sure what you mean from a routing perspective, but I think the priority should be...
commented 2025-10-28 17:16:44 UTC by ConnorGa ♦2
157308968
(Comments: 2)
TheBestIdea
(Discussed changesets: 70)
Exclusively for bikes. It is very similar to way 1217875370 (except is has a concrete island instead of a painted one).
commented 2025-10-28 17:15:27 UTC by TheBestIdea ♦115
173890953
(Comments: 1)
ahapen
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Toastable staat al in OSM. Wijziging teruggedraaid.
commented 2025-10-28 16:49:01 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018
173883819
(Comments: 2)
keichwa
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Ja, ich war vor Ort. Danke fuer den Hinweis!
commented 2025-10-28 16:47:25 UTC by keichwa ♦3
173856687
(Comments: 2)
Alexander Avtanski
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Thanks! Fixed that.
commented 2025-10-28 16:40:38 UTC by Alexander Avtanski ♦3
140397458
(Comments: 1)
Mateusz Konieczny
(Discussed changesets: 551)
confirmed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3854000
commented 2025-10-28 16:38:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173826696
(Comments: 7)
DamianKosa
(Discussed changesets: 1)
o to dzięki za info!

w takim razie to wielkie dzięki za przekazanie informacji, jest teraz w pełni OK i zapraszam do dalszych edycji

mam nadzieję że będzie mniej pytań co do nich :)
commented 2025-10-28 16:37:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173892015
(Comments: 2)
Ryan Vuong
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Luggage storage near Hue Railway Station"
commented 2025-10-28 16:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173780255
(Comments: 3)
GATAA RANA
(Discussed changesets: 3)
There's no problem! You will learn from mistakes eventually.
commented 2025-10-28 16:27:07 UTC by Donut Master 🍩 ♦23
173890823
(Comments: 1)
Michael Glatz
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Heidenheimer Straße 79 wurde abgerissen.
commented 2025-10-28 16:09:43 UTC by Michael Glatz ♦1
173876005
(Comments: 1)
Scazzamureddhu
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please do not create extra address points. Addresses in Belgium are computed automatically and we prefer not to have to manage duplicates on POI.
We fixed your edit, as well as the previous one.
commented 2025-10-28 15:50:36 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
173862740
(Comments: 1)
hahae
(Discussed changesets: 5)
reverted in 173889527 due to possible incompatible license
commented 2025-10-28 15:47:26 UTC by hahae ♦9
173715973
(Comments: 1)
midget sub
(Discussed changesets: 8)
I think highway=path might have been correct, according to the wiki "Paths kept mainly by people repeatedly walking on them, or those that are only minimally constructed, are usually tagged as highway=path"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org...
commented 2025-10-28 15:46:19 UTC by jm428 ♦19
173857989
(Comments: 1)
Omni Vigore
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Dein erster POI sieht schon nicht schlecht aus.

Ich hätte Anmerkungen zu deiner Änderung:

- Bei RundumBaum: &...
commented 2025-10-28 15:40:16 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
173887990
(Comments: 2)
trailschneck
(Discussed changesets: 58)
Keine Ursache. Nächstes mal schau ich mir die beiden Notes am Schloss Waldthausen an. Das war mir heute etwas zu weit - da krieg ich Ärger mit meiner Frau. ;-)
commented 2025-10-28 15:36:55 UTC by trailschneck ♦48
173881362
(Comments: 1)
ALzBln
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Adressnamen werden in OSM übrigens i.d.R. nicht abgekürzt, insbesondere, weil man mit SC ja auch Straßen antippen kann, um die Straße einer Adresse zu setzen.
commented 2025-10-28 15:32:49 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦232
171166898
(Comments: 1)
srbije
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Reverted as vandalism:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173889289
commented 2025-10-28 15:32:19 UTC by anshanin ♦22
173846205
(Comments: 2)
Adam Haba
(Discussed changesets: 120)
Już poprawiłem. Dziękuje
commented 2025-10-28 15:27:21 UTC by Adam Haba ♦27
173738724
(Comments: 1)
TBD0320
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A few issues.
First, solve the issues shown by the issue triangle of IDeditor before you upload your work.
Your mappings are not that accurate as we might expect. Buildings not squared. Building nodes connected to...
commented 2025-10-28 15:21:31 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
169301144
(Comments: 1)
l3BAM
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Bonjour,

es-tu sûr du numéro siret de MLK bâtiment, cf. la note que j'ai rajoutée sur le point et sa source
Cordialement
commented 2025-10-28 15:11:47 UTC by Yunan973 ♦79
173888258
(Comments: 1)
Hnidko2
(Discussed changesets: 2)
#mapbox_editing Geometry was fixed according to Bing Maps Aerial
commented 2025-10-28 15:09:03 UTC by Hnidko2 ♦2
173845245
(Comments: 1)
ZebraLisa
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Ciao Lisa
Hier hast du die Zebrabox-Webseitenadresse auf den Eingang gelegt.
Ich habe die Adresse in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173887399 wieder entfernt.
Gruss,
habi
commented 2025-10-28 14:45:55 UTC by habi ♦1,938
173844868
(Comments: 1)
ZebraLisa
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Ciao Lisa
Hier ist der Zebrabox-Standort zwei Mal erfasst, was nicht Sinn macht.
Einmal als shop=storage_rental bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13261738537 und einmal ebenso bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923438600
Ebenso macht...
commented 2025-10-28 14:39:25 UTC by habi ♦1,938
173839887
(Comments: 1)
ZebraLisa
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Ciao Lisa
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Du hast hier (und in allen deinen anderen Änderungen) den Zebraboxen einen `building`-Wert vergeben.
Sofe...
commented 2025-10-28 14:30:32 UTC by habi ♦1,938
173886314
(Comments: 1)
Yuliya Petrash
(Discussed changesets: 1)
I forgot to add the source that i'n using "Bing Maps Aerial"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173886314

commented 2025-10-28 14:29:38 UTC by Yuliya Petrash ♦1
173858766
(Comments: 1)
Căprar Andrei
(Discussed changesets: 5)
source: survey
commented 2025-10-28 14:28:41 UTC by Căprar Andrei ♦4
168664071
(Comments: 2)
Fabian1429
(Discussed changesets: 32)
Hey, ja okay.
Wir hatten die Diskussion an anderer Stelle schonmal und abgeschlossen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172410363#map=16/52.37121/13.42237

Grüße
commented 2025-10-28 14:20:19 UTC by Fabian1429 ♦28
173885824
(Comments: 1)
Hnidko2
(Discussed changesets: 2)
#mapbox_editing Geometry was fixed according to Esri World Imagery
commented 2025-10-28 14:18:19 UTC by Hnidko2 ♦2
173690086
(Comments: 2)
YacoobPL
(Discussed changesets: 40)
W porządku, dzięki za informację, zmieniam landuse na brownfield w takim razie.
commented 2025-10-28 14:14:25 UTC by YacoobPL ♦29
173688530
(Comments: 4)
YacoobPL
(Discussed changesets: 40)
Okej, dzięki ;)
commented 2025-10-28 14:13:54 UTC by YacoobPL ♦29
173874845
(Comments: 2)
RonaldM011
(Discussed changesets: 6)
CTRL-f5 voor het effect
commented 2025-10-28 14:13:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173882699
(Comments: 3)
Michiel van der Meer (real)
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Geen idee. In OSM stond het al goed, want op layers die nog wachten op hun update stond het stukje gewoon ingetekend.
Bij een revert van mij (niet opgeslagen) klopte het ook.
Het was wel een lijnelement, maar dat hoeft geen bezwaar te zijn. <...
commented 2025-10-28 14:11:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173871832
(Comments: 1)
wouterko
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Dit ging niet zoals gehoopt en heb ik gerevert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173872927
commented 2025-10-28 14:09:21 UTC by wouterko ♦3
173881713
(Comments: 1)
Татьяна Тюкова
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Не дублируйте точки. Карты в Maps.me обновляются в течение месяца
commented 2025-10-28 14:06:05 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
173878813
(Comments: 1)
mcast
(Discussed changesets: 1)
New building (since satellite imagery) is not drawn
commented 2025-10-28 13:59:51 UTC by mcast ♦1
173848853
(Comments: 1)
Soccer's dumb 6 7
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Is the bridge literally named "Cool Bridge"? If not, then the name=* tag isn't the right tag for that. description=* would be better in that case, though describing why it's cool would be ideal.
---
...
commented 2025-10-28 13:57:05 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
172441536
(Comments: 1)
Soph4Future
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello. Thank you for mapping on this project.
Please tag buildings as building=yes because that is standard for OSM tagging of building. From the Imagery we cannot see what the purpose is of a building.
Best regards and keep mapping

commented 2025-10-28 13:53:29 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
X173849391
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Could you please limit changesets to a single geographic area? Several of your changes have appeared on the recent changes for Oklahoma just because Oklahoma happened to be between two disparate areas you edited in the same changeset.
...
commented 2025-10-28 13:50:59 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
173883785
(Comments: 1)
RonaldM011
(Discussed changesets: 6)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
commented 2025-10-28 13:47:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173883955
(Comments: 1)
RonaldM011
(Discussed changesets: 6)
De ingangen maak je met een node vast aan de gebouwomtrek.
entrance=yes en entrance=main
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
Het gebouw heeft geen layer=1
Een weg onder het gebouw of overkapping krijgt de tag covered=yes
J...
commented 2025-10-28 13:46:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173878600
(Comments: 1)
nathpass2002
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. Did you have any more information for a natural = cave_entrance inside of a building?
commented 2025-10-28 13:44:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
168413750
(Comments: 2)
LaLinea
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Grüß Dich Martin,
entschuldige bitte die späte Antwort. Die Aufnahmen habe ich von einer recht unbekannten Webseite gefunden. Zwischenzeitlich musste ich aber feststellen dass ein Teil der hinterlegten Aufnahmen von kommerziellen...
commented 2025-10-28 13:43:32 UTC by LaLinea ♦13
173884150
(Comments: 1)
TinPetreković
(Discussed changesets: 163)
Identical road segmetns were split for no reason since the same truck restricion applies to both of them and there are signs on each end of the West 50th Street.

Segments were merged back together in changeset 173884234

https://www.open...
commented 2025-10-28 13:42:06 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178
167826075
(Comments: 3)
VA00
(Discussed changesets: 145)
Myślałem, że może mieszkasz gdzieś niedaleko lub coś wiesz od jakiegoś znajomego :/
commented 2025-10-28 13:40:12 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
173835910
(Comments: 1)
Gilbert Osullivan
(Discussed changesets: 2)
User bas been blocked, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18874
commented 2025-10-28 13:36:41 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
169002132
(Comments: 2)
LaLinea
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Hallo martinst,
der Fischerbrunnens ist wieder da wo er vorher schon war: https://osm.org/node/459038444
Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-28 13:36:09 UTC by LaLinea ♦13
173831180
(Comments: 1)
Gilbert Osullivan
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173842316
commented 2025-10-28 13:36:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173709773
(Comments: 1)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
Skoro to dojazd na lotnisko, to dlaczego Awicenny nie jest secondary?

Tak, to dojazd na autostradę, ale służący tylko ruchowi lokalnemu, bo dla tranzytu lepsza i szybsza droga jest przez A4 lub S8.

Już kilka razy ta droga była pod...
commented 2025-10-28 13:32:48 UTC by pavvv ♦561
173876948
(Comments: 6)
Ben van Laar
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Ha Eggie,
Ik zie nu hoe je dat gedaan hebt! Bedankt hiervoor.
Gr.Ben
commented 2025-10-28 13:28:29 UTC by Ben van Laar ♦1
173883350
(Comments: 2)
Conaco02
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Aqui está um comentário de amostra com base nas suas edições do mapa: "Ajustados nós e vias"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted nodes and ways&...
commented 2025-10-28 13:26:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
167153563
(Comments: 1)
aceman444
(Discussed changesets: 112)
Pozerám teraz na fixme pre uzol 12863150662 a tam je drôtený plot ale ľudia v ňom urobili dieru a chodia cez to. Keď budem mať cestu okolo tak to preverím ešte v akom je to stave teraz a či to náhodou aj ...
commented 2025-10-28 13:17:39 UTC by EfreetSK ♦7
173753706
(Comments: 2)
cavamu
(Discussed changesets: 1)
En este conjunto de cambios, han sido eliminados los elementos superpuestos.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173882682#map=16/41.49060/-5.68595
Por favor, revisa tus ediciones y consulta las dudas que te puedan surgir.

Un saludo.
commented 2025-10-28 13:09:12 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112
173877972
(Comments: 2)
Curni_
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hoi Eggie,

Dankjewel voor het kijken, ik heb net een nieuwe bewerking voorgesteld waar het terrein is gelabeld ipv de schuren.

groet
commented 2025-10-28 12:55:47 UTC by Curni_ ♦1
173876493
(Comments: 1)
Gustry
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Formidable, merci pour la bonne contribution.
commented 2025-10-28 12:45:28 UTC by sykul ♦67
173851205
(Comments: 3)
tvbrene
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Selber erfinden ist aber schlecht, weil so keiner weiß was du damit genau meinst und Nutzer diesen Wert nicht erwarten
commented 2025-10-28 12:43:36 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413
171596624
(Comments: 1)
na111
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183429367 really named "Undefined"? Other maps have a different name (which I won't copy of course)
commented 2025-10-28 12:32:09 UTC by mtmail ♦157
173573601
(Comments: 1)
Jez Nicholson
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Jez, per the wiki, addr:city is the postal city, which is Hove.
commented 2025-10-28 12:24:23 UTC by Paul Flo Williams ♦7
169349298
(Comments: 1)
Brickelt963
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Bonjour,

le site web et la page facebook du resto la bohème ne fonctionnent plus, je les ai supprimés.
Je ne sais pas si tu habites sur place (moi je suis en Guyane), mais il serait peut-être bien d'y aller voir pou...
commented 2025-10-28 12:12:35 UTC by Yunan973 ♦79
173874423
(Comments: 1)
Fraxi
(Discussed changesets: 109)
"...видяни по-рано обекти" трябваше да бъде.
commented 2025-10-28 12:07:11 UTC by Fraxi ♦169
173874680
(Comments: 1)
RonaldM011
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Feedback...Lijkt me oke
commented 2025-10-28 12:01:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173880020
(Comments: 1)
Ccwc Services (Tom Brophy)
(Discussed changesets: 1)
There are units in E6, E6 appears to be the block
commented 2025-10-28 11:54:24 UTC by Ccwc Services (Tom Brophy) ♦1
173875893
(Comments: 1)
Yunkers
(Discussed changesets: 101)
Tonaż i jego `source:` zdaje się że też… ciekawe co jeszcze i gdzie jeszcze
commented 2025-10-28 11:54:22 UTC by dzamper ♦157
173540955
(Comments: 1)
thefloh
(Discussed changesets: 3)
hier haben sich mehrere inner-Flächen überschnitten, weshalb dieses Wald-MP ebenfalls defekt war
commented 2025-10-28 11:52:10 UTC by Luzandro ♦946
173738643
(Comments: 1)
m0um3n
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Merci beaucoup
commented 2025-10-28 11:46:18 UTC by Superadlen ♦172
173540285
(Comments: 2)
GKremp
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Hallo Manuel,
den "bridge:name" bei "man_made=bridge" war ein nicht beabsichtigter Fehler von mir, sorry.
Aber zu den Fahrbahnen führt OSM-Wiki dazu aus: "Mit bridge:name=* wird der Name einer Brücke angegebe...
commented 2025-10-28 11:45:32 UTC by GKremp ♦6
173533325
(Comments: 1)
thefloh
(Discussed changesets: 3)
zwei der neuen bare_rock Flächen waren nicht geschlossen

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5025969
commented 2025-10-28 11:33:47 UTC by Luzandro ♦946
173821684
(Comments: 2)
Kri_ttt
(Discussed changesets: 37)
Thank you for bringing this up. I initially misunderstood the layout and thought the lower road allowed straight-through access. After reviewing it again, I realize that was an error on my part, and I’ve now corrected the tag accordingly. I app...
commented 2025-10-28 11:07:24 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦14
173877841
(Comments: 1)
wies1
(Discussed changesets: 134)
Fehler bei source:

Buildings and addresses

GWR Swisstopo 2025
commented 2025-10-28 11:02:59 UTC by wies1 ♦169
167715399
(Comments: 2)
Wesley Alves
(Discussed changesets: 2)
consertado
commented 2025-10-28 11:00:16 UTC by erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,974
173877337
(Comments: 1)
Sylabowy Kot
(Discussed changesets: 102)
Survey też był źródłem.

Nie sprawdzałem dostępności dróg przed osiedlem (access=no to przesada), ale oczywista jest przejezdność do jego obsługi.
commented 2025-10-28 10:51:13 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267
173848093
(Comments: 2)
archie
(Discussed changesets: 288)
Vill du har vänligheten att inte föra in historiska objekt i osm, som inte - nu - längre existerar. Tack.
commented 2025-10-28 10:49:10 UTC by archie ♦1,355
173876961
(Comments: 2)
lifelonghealth
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Health clinic in Clarendon Hills and Burr Ridge"
commented 2025-10-28 10:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173722257
(Comments: 4)
Hugoren Martinako
(Discussed changesets: 59)
Bueno, aunque haya corregido muchos, veo que en Osmose que sigue habiendo muchísimos más errores. Mira, solo de direcciones para Álava 😄: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#loc=9/42.917/-2.7448&level=1%2C2%2C3&cou...
commented 2025-10-28 10:40:33 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦208
171241265
(Comments: 1)
Termininja
(Discussed changesets: 33)
leisure=track is incorrect, use highway=raceway instead.
commented 2025-10-28 10:39:38 UTC by foreigner037 ♦66
173420790
(Comments: 1)
Tsur Halamish
(Discussed changesets: 68)
שלום צור
בבקשה לא לתת שם כמו בור מים, סוג הנקודה ברור מהתיוג.
תודה
commented 2025-10-28 10:37:32 UTC by hatul ♦410
172196512
(Comments: 1)
Termininja
(Discussed changesets: 33)
Hi,

please avoid using planned and use proposed instead.

Also, this is not how you tag such features. Use proposed:amenity=parking instead.
commented 2025-10-28 10:37:02 UTC by foreigner037 ♦66
173876317
(Comments: 2)
sanprova
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Pest control services in Richmond VA"
commented 2025-10-28 10:30:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173858214
(Comments: 1)
adelpedregal
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones y bienvenido a la comunidad OSM Chile.

Ojo por favor con realinear caminos. Lo hizo con las fotos bing, pero hay otros proveedores de fotos, todos con alineaciones un poco distintas. También están ...
commented 2025-10-28 10:27:28 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173865519
(Comments: 2)
nxd
(Discussed changesets: 1)
עוד כמה הערות:
1. הסימון הנכון הוא
highway=path
bicycle=designated

כי cycleway מיועד לשביל אופניים עירוני.

2. לא צריך לתת שם לכל קטע ביחס הם יקבלו ...
commented 2025-10-28 10:18:44 UTC by hatul ♦410
173875599
(Comments: 2)
Dead Simple Computing
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "IT services company in Reading"
commented 2025-10-28 10:15:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173227350
(Comments: 2)
Chris Dekker
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Dank je voor je bericht. Ik ben nieuw en we il graag een bijdrage leveren om in mijn wijk wandelpaden toe te voegen, die verschillende testen met elkaar verbonden. Dit was mijn eerste, om te kijken hoe precies werkt. Dank voor je correctie. Dat zal i...
commented 2025-10-28 10:14:54 UTC by Chris Dekker ♦1
172492121
(Comments: 1)
Matthew Hostak
(Discussed changesets: 39)
Ahoj, si si istý, že sa tu dá ubytovať? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22813214
commented 2025-10-28 10:08:49 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦35
172331261
(Comments: 5)
ljouglet
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Je viens d'annuler le changeset et j'ai bien récupéré les 3 relations..! https:// https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17998773#map=15/50.64460/3.11677&layers=CN https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19578144#map...
commented 2025-10-28 10:08:07 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦179
173874890
(Comments: 2)
ayman tight
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added building with name "مركز شرطة العبيدي", height 3"
commented 2025-10-28 10:06:51 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173851152
(Comments: 4)
kmpoppe
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Ich hab die Gebäude nun an die amtlichen DOP20 angepasst.
commented 2025-10-28 10:02:11 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413
171964471
(Comments: 2)
RV2001
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Wieso haben Sie die Gleisgeometrie verändert und die Gleisverbindungen ab den Weichen 312/313 beim Römerhof neu als "Brücke" deklariert? Da dies von Ihnen nicht das erste changeset ist, welches uns als VBZ viele Tram Fahrwege...
commented 2025-10-28 09:55:36 UTC by VBZ Balmer ♦2
173701681
(Comments: 3)
Kaduna
(Discussed changesets: 20)
ok, thank you very much.
Are those gps traces available?

regards
commented 2025-10-28 09:54:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173844385
(Comments: 2)
onmaps
(Discussed changesets: 8)
middels changeset 173858154
commented 2025-10-28 09:49:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173874240
(Comments: 1)
Yasmina Bendik
(Discussed changesets: 4)
*ERRATUM : Guarbecque
commented 2025-10-28 09:47:55 UTC by Yasmina Bendik ♦1
130435591
(Comments: 1)
Geofreund1
(Discussed changesets: 143)
Hallo Geofreund,
wenn du mich vorgestern gefragt hättest, hätte ich Ernst-Abbé geschrieben.
Tatsächlich heißt der Mann, nach dem die Straße benannt wurde Ernst-Abbe. Die Straßenschilder sind auch ohne Acc...
commented 2025-10-28 09:47:49 UTC by Knottenfresser ♦1
173802728
(Comments: 1)
Eyegraphic
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Beste Eyegraphic,

Welkom op openstreetmap! Fijn dat jullie willen bijdragen aan de kaartgegevens. Je hebt al een welkomsbericht gekregen van een andere mapper, als ik me niet vergis. Heb je dit al eens kunnen bekijken, of hierop kunnen antwoor...
commented 2025-10-28 09:46:50 UTC by djsa ♦22
173834265
(Comments: 2)
apires
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Olá,
Andei este fds por estes lados e concluí esta edição um pouco à pressa e si, ficou a faltar o comentário. Foi micromapping e ajuste aos Ortos mais recentes da DGT.
Cumprimentos,
APires
commented 2025-10-28 09:40:55 UTC by apires ♦7
173873162
(Comments: 2)
RonaldM011
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Top dankjewel, postbezorging gaat meestal mis omdat de begane grond (47, 49, 51, 53) met eigen voordeur niet worden herkend. Dus wordt het maar in de open centrale hal 'gegooid'.
commented 2025-10-28 09:35:42 UTC by RonaldM011 ♦1
173871253
(Comments: 4)
Loud Flag
(Discussed changesets: 2)
⚲ Wolframkade 2, 3812 RC Amersfoort
Het is denk ik nu correct.
commented 2025-10-28 09:29:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173845615
(Comments: 1)
IMMO-adviseur
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Beste IMMO-adviseur,

Je bedrijf op de kaart zetten is een goed idee! Tip: als je de juiste tags toevoegd, zoals office=estate_agent in jullie geval, zal dit betere resultaten opleveren.

Vriendelijke groeten,
djsa
commented 2025-10-28 09:14:25 UTC by djsa ♦22
173872605
(Comments: 1)
RonaldM011
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Om een adres te vidnen maakt het niet veel uit. Sommige gebruikers vinden het juist weer handig als de adressen op e...
commented 2025-10-28 09:13:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173860396
(Comments: 1)
Zaunhänger
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Besser den highway-typ in construction = path behalten
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173860396

commented 2025-10-28 08:56:23 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413
173827329
(Comments: 2)
blauloke
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Mist; :(
ich arbeite gerade mal wieder eine Liste ab und im Eifer vergesse ich immer nach jedem Eintrag hoch zu laden. Du bist nicht der Erste, der mich deswegen bemängelt. Ich versuche mich zu bessern, kann aber nichts versprechen. :)
commented 2025-10-28 08:52:30 UTC by blauloke ♦9
173841878
(Comments: 2)
Valkai_S
(Discussed changesets: 25)
Köszi, már le is vettem a nevét.
Csak az érdekesség kedvéért: érdemes lenne-e ilyen esetben "disused ditch"-nek jelölni, vagy lehetne-e valahogy másképp az eredeti ...
commented 2025-10-28 08:48:35 UTC by Valkai_S ♦13
169090679
(Comments: 2)
Lucinux85500
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Thank you, it's been corrected.
commented 2025-10-28 08:48:04 UTC by Lucinux85500 ♦4
173870482
(Comments: 1)
omidmash
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Fixed opening hours based on official website: https://www.musee-moyenage.fr/en/visiter/practical-information.html
commented 2025-10-28 08:24:11 UTC by omidmash ♦1
173852809
(Comments: 1)
Paranoic
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hola Paranoic, gràcies per aportar informació a OpenStreetMap, l’etiqueta que s’utilitza més actualment per als identificadors de les wikipedra sembla ser "ref:wikipedra"
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org...
commented 2025-10-28 08:23:34 UTC by aTarom ♦824
173782471
(Comments: 2)
Qiu Weiping
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM (again)! Please be careful! You moved the two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/8461388253, https://www.osm.org/node/9975077297 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the node back to the original position.

commented 2025-10-28 08:18:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173838293
(Comments: 1)
Vicolapatat
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Il s’agit bien d’un rond-point traversable, pourquoi changer ?
commented 2025-10-28 08:17:30 UTC by Ltrlg ♦79
173811620
(Comments: 1)
Sonatagardener
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/12233738856 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!

commented 2025-10-28 08:07:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173820594
(Comments: 1)
JacksonMiller03
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lanes. I will delete your change.
commented 2025-10-28 07:59:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173869155
(Comments: 1)
barrybarry123
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , as it's for proper names themselves only. Use `description=` if needed.
commented 2025-10-28 07:56:57 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629
173196930
(Comments: 1)
Adam Haba
(Discussed changesets: 120)
Zamiast usuwać dobrze zmapowany ciąg pieszo-rowerowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364218493/history lepiej było usunąć drogę dla rowerów będącą obok. Teraz utworzyłeś źle zmapowane dwie osobne linie. Przypominam, bo już dawno...
commented 2025-10-28 07:56:20 UTC by YomanNH ♦387
173863727
(Comments: 1)
Jess Macpherson
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, you have mapped two defibrillators at the same spot. Are there two here or should I delete the duplicate?
commented 2025-10-28 07:53:58 UTC by nevw ♦2,063
173831533
(Comments: 1)
dankarcherconstruction
(Discussed changesets: 1)
## Reverted ##
Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.

commented 2025-10-28 07:52:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173869296
(Comments: 3)
Paweł Akhremczyk
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего описания могла бы быть: "Магазин гриля и аксессуаров"
---
(Auto-translation)
commented 2025-10-28 07:48:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173861208
(Comments: 1)
Yomapman
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please don't overpaint an existing street for renaming. I correct your modification
commented 2025-10-28 07:24:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173860447
(Comments: 1)
SueA5
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new path line duplicated the existing path line and it doubled back on itself.

The path does exist but it was wrongly positioned. I've removed your duplicated line and corrected the existing path...
commented 2025-10-28 07:22:18 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948
173866900
(Comments: 1)
Axcess Accident Center of Provo
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! I remove your entry, because you are not part of a praking slot.
For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.

commented 2025-10-28 07:05:33 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
168455607
(Comments: 2)
dzamper
(Discussed changesets: 49)
Umieszczanie opisów pod kluczem `name` jest sprzeczne z duchem OSM, więc na pewno komuś wadziło, może nikomu się nie chciało tego zmieniać.

Napisałeś po części tak jakbym usunął wyświetlanie drogi jako takiej, a ona cały ...
commented 2025-10-28 06:59:50 UTC by dzamper ♦157
173856542
(Comments: 1)
juesi65
(Discussed changesets: 6)
You can use the ref=* or name=* tag to enter the route number for a bus route, depending on the situation. However, you must add the entire route for this. For details, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%96ffentlicher_Verkehr#Tags_in_der...
commented 2025-10-28 06:48:14 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
141046270
(Comments: 1)
greyst0ke
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi, I am about to update the boundary of Kurrajong Place Nature Refuge using Capad 2024. I noticed the track following around the bottom and western border but this is not visible on satellite imagery on the western side and around to about where a t...
commented 2025-10-28 06:30:19 UTC by nevw ♦2,063
173854407
(Comments: 1)
czdawes
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Are you sure the waterway=river tags you added to the rivers are correct? Looking at the satellite images, waterway=stream seems more appropriate.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=river

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta...
commented 2025-10-28 06:19:18 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
166548470
(Comments: 1)
BlumleinPear
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hi, we do not have permission to use the QTopo map for mapping in osm.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Queensland
commented 2025-10-28 06:17:03 UTC by nevw ♦2,063
173779897
(Comments: 4)
Bienson
(Discussed changesets: 30)
Danke.
commented 2025-10-28 06:15:28 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦10
173543270
(Comments: 2)
nave88
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Hi Alex, thank you for your comment. I did not know about the format of the "wikipedia" tag. I had a look at the other UNESCO churches that I had edited, and I fixed this issue.
commented 2025-10-28 05:16:05 UTC by nave88 ♦7
173840461
(Comments: 1)
cromaofficecbba
(Discussed changesets: 1)
hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el nombre.

Tiene sentido que el nombre sea continuación de la parte sur, tenía dudas, pero vos lo confirmaste.

Solo una sugerencia, el prefijo Av. siempre debemos desabreviarlo en nu...
commented 2025-10-28 04:37:07 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,600
173827124
(Comments: 1)
Keek4600
(Discussed changesets: 24)
Es gibt auch weiterhin hier keine 8 verschiedene Krankenhäuser.

Und wieso ist dieses Gebäudeteil unverbunden zum westlich anschließenden Gebäudeteil?:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445370241

Wieso liegt ...
commented 2025-10-28 04:11:04 UTC by Bienson ♦351
154959926
(Comments: 2)
ratrun
(Discussed changesets: 155)
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. In this changeset, I fixed an obviously wrong edit. Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171146756#map=18/35.178579/-106.543897&layers=VN was connected with this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/n...
commented 2025-10-28 03:48:19 UTC by ratrun ♦250
173778439
(Comments: 2)
Wright One
(Discussed changesets: 23)
P-line has already removed
commented 2025-10-28 03:24:33 UTC by Wright One ♦43
173827259
(Comments: 1)
Keek4600
(Discussed changesets: 24)
Bitte keine POIs entfernen, wenn z.B. das Ladenlokal noch existiert.

Stattdessen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:*
commented 2025-10-28 03:13:31 UTC by Bienson ♦351
173837765
(Comments: 1)
GATAA RANA
(Discussed changesets: 3)
According to Esri World Imagery, there is no splitter island at 41.1001847,20.0294921, and no filter road at 41.1004609,20.0292378. Those edits look similar to a recently blocked user who added unsourced road layouts, and has not (to date) answered a...
commented 2025-10-28 03:12:04 UTC by ika-chan! ♦296
173854741
(Comments: 1)
Evono
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Reverted, duplicate removed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173863304
commented 2025-10-28 03:01:45 UTC by Bienson ♦351
173432239
(Comments: 1)
PcMouse1
(Discussed changesets: 23)
Please note that all buildings have been georeferenced with LIDAR and multiple imagery sources

commented 2025-10-28 03:01:36 UTC by PcMouse1 ♦69
173862876
(Comments: 1)
ICT_maps
(Discussed changesets: 8)
thank you!
commented 2025-10-28 02:50:00 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
167157565
(Comments: 3)
ZeLonewolf
(Discussed changesets: 152)
Yes, this is the sign.
- The "No Trespassing" sign in the background is meant for the forest adjacent to the road; not the road itself.
- The Title 31 definition of "Private road" is to be interpreted as the definition in th...
commented 2025-10-28 02:26:50 UTC by aduxas ♦37
173606011
(Comments: 1)
残阳逐流
(Discussed changesets: 1)
很好的成果,太感谢了
commented 2025-10-28 02:07:13 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦9
173777769
(Comments: 1)
campbelltree
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Actual source: private correspondence with HOA
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173777769

commented 2025-10-28 02:05:17 UTC by campbelltree ♦22
173748708
(Comments: 1)
BG2EWI
(Discussed changesets: 1)
set太大了,请您注意拆分
commented 2025-10-28 02:05:13 UTC by DanhengOSM ♦9
173698505
(Comments: 1)
bluehoneybees
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello there! The changes mostly looks good, except for the one use of 'surface=ground' on way/1444414047 - use an actual descriptive tag, not the generic 'paved' 'unpaved' 'ground'. The other thing to notice is...
commented 2025-10-28 01:44:30 UTC by campbelltree ♦22
173443366
(Comments: 1)
Map-Updater
(Discussed changesets: 1)
truck isn't a commonly used access key per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation

hgv=* is likely the best tag for "trucks" signage.
commented 2025-10-28 01:33:55 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173473008
(Comments: 1)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
I've updated the tags to driveway.
commented 2025-10-28 01:26:41 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173473092
(Comments: 1)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
I've updated the tags to driveway and disconnected the road from the power line.
commented 2025-10-28 01:26:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173473116
(Comments: 1)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
I've updated the tags to shared driveway
commented 2025-10-28 01:24:50 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173473353
(Comments: 1)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
I've updated the tags to shared driveway
commented 2025-10-28 01:24:00 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173700810
(Comments: 3)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Hi, I see that you have reverted the other changes except this changeset and another one. Could you revert these as well?
commented 2025-10-28 01:14:13 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22
173701073
(Comments: 2)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Hi, I see that you have reverted the other changes except this changeset and another one. Could you revert these as well?
commented 2025-10-28 01:13:55 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22
173473709
(Comments: 1)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
I've updated the tags to a driveway.
commented 2025-10-28 00:53:56 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173474004
(Comments: 1)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
I've updated these to a shared driveway.
commented 2025-10-28 00:52:41 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173476014
(Comments: 1)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
I've updated the tags to be a driveway
commented 2025-10-28 00:48:34 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173476128
(Comments: 1)
rboda
(Discussed changesets: 28)
I've updated the tag here to mark it as a driveway.
commented 2025-10-28 00:47:49 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173851006
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Hello,

You have updated properties of public transport stops in Germany https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173850855 , housenumbers in Morocco https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173851006 , and speed limits in Mexico https://www.open...
commented 2025-10-28 00:17:14 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦331
88604290
(Comments: 1)
ppjj Imports+NHD
(Discussed changesets: 16)
I just noticed that your NHD import was added (2020) after my mapping of the Tununak River and tribs. (2017).

I wish you had done a better job of checking for existing waterways before the import operation.
commented 2025-10-28 00:09:58 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦170
173429374
(Comments: 1)
c-the-world
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi. Are you sure your new restaurant is not a duplicate?
Location below is correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12309485965


commented 2025-10-28 00:08:20 UTC by anshanin ♦22
88604307
(Comments: 1)
ppjj Imports+NHD
(Discussed changesets: 16)
I just noticed that your NHD import was added (2020) after my mapping of the Tununak River and tribs. (2017).

I wish you had done a better job of checking for existing waterways before the import operation.
commented 2025-10-28 00:06:03 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦170
100118497
(Comments: 3)
daganzdaanda
(Discussed changesets: 18)
Hi daganzdaanda,

I think you are correct. Likely I sent this to you by accident. I addressed and sent a message to the contributor who added the tags.

Thanks for your response!
commented 2025-10-27 23:51:16 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173842183
(Comments: 2)
Ооег
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18876
commented 2025-10-27 23:38:39 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029
173855127
(Comments: 1)
StalkerOSM
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305104455

Pozdrawiam!...
commented 2025-10-27 23:34:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173856624
(Comments: 1)
Incognitoo
(Discussed changesets: 1)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad...
commented 2025-10-27 23:34:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173860308
(Comments: 1)
demaniac
(Discussed changesets: 130)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7655174575
https://www.openstreetmap.org...
commented 2025-10-27 23:34:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
166163883
(Comments: 1)
Ооег
(Discussed changesets: 5)
DWG revert - fictitious items

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173860832
commented 2025-10-27 23:33:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029
163679613
(Comments: 2)
Ооег
(Discussed changesets: 5)
DWG revert - fictitious items

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173860832
commented 2025-10-27 23:33:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029
173634537
(Comments: 1)
Ооег
(Discussed changesets: 5)
DWG revert - fictitious items

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173860832
commented 2025-10-27 23:33:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029
173833682
(Comments: 1)
Robotnikmajowy
(Discussed changesets: 117)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445397674

Pozdrawiam!...
commented 2025-10-27 23:25:29 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173830075
(Comments: 4)
Yoshi67
(Discussed changesets: 2)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-27 23:25:26 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173829895
(Comments: 6)
Yoshi67
(Discussed changesets: 2)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-27 23:25:24 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173845093
(Comments: 5)
demaniac
(Discussed changesets: 130)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13261759510
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
commented 2025-10-27 23:25:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173563166
(Comments: 1)
ilovecycleways
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I think to meet https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cyclestreet it must be a road that is signposted/marked to be explicitly for bicycles as the primary road users with motor vehicles as secondary users.
commented 2025-10-27 23:07:46 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
162760683
(Comments: 3)
theDM
(Discussed changesets: 125)
Cześć, tam ruch jest znacznie niższy niż na Dąbrowskiego czy Powstańców Warszawskich.
commented 2025-10-27 23:06:10 UTC by theDM ♦142
173846478
(Comments: 4)
dav23r
(Discussed changesets: 4)
no idea, actually, which one would be better...
commented 2025-10-27 23:04:47 UTC by yelisey90 ♦184
173856372
(Comments: 1)
dr0ptable
(Discussed changesets: 1)
reverted - accroding to cadastre, the whole building is 16 კორპუსი 3, see https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal . However, if there are any photos of house number signs, they would take priority

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1...
commented 2025-10-27 23:04:17 UTC by yelisey90 ♦184
173568549
(Comments: 1)
yourstreetromer27
(Discussed changesets: 1)
the tag nudism=yes already implies this so no need for a note
commented 2025-10-27 23:01:56 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173656081
(Comments: 1)
BakedCake02
(Discussed changesets: 4)
to be honest this looks more urban than rural, given the small block size, dense housing and the road network layout...
commented 2025-10-27 22:54:40 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173695831
(Comments: 1)
Deedend
(Discussed changesets: 1)
thanks for merging the address nodes with your new building outlines correctly.
commented 2025-10-27 22:49:37 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173740940
(Comments: 1)
bryanf__
(Discussed changesets: 6)
hi this is the footpath not a bridge, therefore I've reverted this change.
commented 2025-10-27 22:46:17 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173846401
(Comments: 7)
demaniac
(Discussed changesets: 130)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2917194110
https://www.openstreetmap.org...
commented 2025-10-27 22:45:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173070480
(Comments: 2)
VeryFakeName
(Discussed changesets: 1)
The trail is real. I hiked the entirety of it
commented 2025-10-27 22:42:46 UTC by VeryFakeName ♦1
X173848633
(Comments: 1)
phuongxmaya
(Discussed changesets: 1)
https://swiftpackageindex.com/keywords/swift/collection.json
commented 2025-10-27 22:42:31 UTC by Ok my cocoa ♦1
173817319
(Comments: 1)
RLMap
(Discussed changesets: 1)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758025663 is not representing the lot boundary, it's representing the trees, the south east corner looks like grass only so shouldn't be included unless it's been reforested.
commented 2025-10-27 22:35:52 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173697375
(Comments: 1)
Dblcut3
(Discussed changesets: 21)
thanks for the update; went to do it myself and saw you already had :D
commented 2025-10-27 22:31:50 UTC by skorasaurus ♦217
173822964
(Comments: 1)
ThierryFr1
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I've restored the address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12411966515 which was deleted in this changeset.
commented 2025-10-27 22:29:31 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
170701671
(Comments: 1)
Leo984567
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I've restored the address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12411966515 which was dragged to the wrong location in this changeset.
commented 2025-10-27 22:29:17 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173823693
(Comments: 1)
ThierryFr1
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I've restored the address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419092614 which was deleted here
commented 2025-10-27 22:23:50 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173743086
(Comments: 1)
Nicola Delfino
(Discussed changesets: 3)
hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap , I just wanted to tell you that there is no missing node for the station, it is already here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1821284 the node you added is a duplicate and I removed it.


commented 2025-10-27 22:19:10 UTC by dieterdreist ♦870
173777581
(Comments: 3)
kingy141000
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173859225
commented 2025-10-27 22:17:22 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
173828740
(Comments: 1)
TylerSTREETMAPS
(Discussed changesets: 8)
I've reverted this change since added layer=-1 to seemingly ground level buildings which seemingly was done to silence editor warnings.
commented 2025-10-27 22:04:24 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173290846
(Comments: 1)
deusjz
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I think this should be at least partially reverted. The bike lanes here are on the street and are better represented by tags on the street's Way. In notes on OSM Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_features , there is a discus...
commented 2025-10-27 21:55:21 UTC by aldimond ♦4
173854743
(Comments: 1)
Devin Markley
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello, please don't reclassify a residential road just because it intersects the two carriageways of one road. An unnamed road that does this would be classified as a tertiary LINK, but this road is clearly not unnamed. Thanks!

https://ww...
commented 2025-10-27 21:44:55 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦118
173845216
(Comments: 2)
Jeroen van Slooten
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Pad heb ik als disused:highway=path teruggezet.
Gr eggie
commented 2025-10-27 21:42:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173852543
(Comments: 2)
lupien
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Dat pad 06 lijkt me onlogisch aan te sluiten.
commented 2025-10-27 21:32:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173827360
(Comments: 2)
Andy_T_56
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Might be better as official_name ?
commented 2025-10-27 21:30:28 UTC by TheSwavu ♦566
173514108
(Comments: 3)
Prosperosity
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Thanks for getting back to me about this. I wasn't sure about that detail.

You ask a great question. When I first started editing OSM data I asked someone I knew about that and they had a really nice explanation. Take for example a buildi...
commented 2025-10-27 21:28:53 UTC by AntSom ♦6
172032720
(Comments: 1)
mcliquid
(Discussed changesets: 203)
vielen Dank - ist die note damit erledigt?
commented 2025-10-27 21:28:49 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394
173833949
(Comments: 4)
Константин Гам
(Discussed changesets: 299)
тележек в нем не было
commented 2025-10-27 21:28:48 UTC by Nine-tailed ♦14
172121610
(Comments: 1)
schäumchen
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Hallo schäumchen, Du hast hier mit einem sehr großen CS hunderte von Touringen-Stempelstellen bearbeitet und die Info aus 'ref' als Duplikat nochmals redundant als 'name' erfasst. Darüber ist die Nummer der Stempe...
commented 2025-10-27 21:28:38 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦75
172925026
(Comments: 2)
LaLinea
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Gerne 🙂
commented 2025-10-27 21:26:34 UTC by LaLinea ♦13
173828992
(Comments: 1)
TylerSTREETMAPS
(Discussed changesets: 8)
I've reverted this change since it removed the building type.
commented 2025-10-27 21:13:27 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173840299
(Comments: 1)
makskolis
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna....
commented 2025-10-27 21:05:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173763951
(Comments: 1)
ODI76
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Szia!

Az Ág utcát átnevezted Szél utcára, ez szerepel az utcatáblán? Mert 2022-ben még Ág utca volt.

Tamás
commented 2025-10-27 21:01:40 UTC by vasony ♦533
173831518
(Comments: 1)
tastrax
(Discussed changesets: 32)
sorry I didn't see your change here, I just reverted the problematic change.
commented 2025-10-27 20:59:43 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173829084
(Comments: 1)
TylerSTREETMAPS
(Discussed changesets: 8)
I've reverted this change since it deleted all the tags per each semi, and regardless it's better to have each semi mapped individually.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173857036
commented 2025-10-27 20:57:13 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173829902
(Comments: 1)
TylerSTREETMAPS
(Discussed changesets: 8)
layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173856994
commented 2025-10-27 20:55:32 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173829113
(Comments: 1)
TylerSTREETMAPS
(Discussed changesets: 8)
from the imagery this building does appear to exist so I've reverted this deletion, though it needs a survey to confirm.
commented 2025-10-27 20:55:02 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173789796
(Comments: 1)
Domaine de la Potelle
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!
Merci pour vos premières contributions. Pour le chemin intitulé "Chemin de terre uniquement accès aux champs", il vaut mieux éviter de mettre cette information dans le nom du chem...
commented 2025-10-27 20:52:27 UTC by juminet ♦100
173602343
(Comments: 1)
anonymouseditor7383
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi and welcome to Openstreetmap,

If possible label the address on the building. If the building has two or more numbers, place the points on the entrance or inside the building.
I merged the address points into buildings.

Thx, Tamas
commented 2025-10-27 20:50:19 UTC by vasony ♦533
173829945
(Comments: 1)
TylerSTREETMAPS
(Discussed changesets: 8)
in the processed deleting the building to replace it with individual buildings you've lost some tags like building=retail and building:levels, where possible these should be retained.
commented 2025-10-27 20:49:46 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173829697
(Comments: 2)
TylerSTREETMAPS
(Discussed changesets: 8)
layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173856773
commented 2025-10-27 20:47:24 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173829306
(Comments: 1)
TylerSTREETMAPS
(Discussed changesets: 8)
layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173856773
commented 2025-10-27 20:47:24 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173845612
(Comments: 3)
eggie
(Discussed changesets: 356)
Zie.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173843845#map=18/52.077703/4.280645&layers=N

commented 2025-10-27 20:43:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173855565
(Comments: 1)
86 poschodí
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Ahoj,
aký má byť význam tejto zmeny? Pýtam sa preto, lebo:
1) zbytočne je duplikovaná adresa z budovy na POI,
2) je nepravdepodobné, že by existovala predajňa hudobných nástrojov v ...
commented 2025-10-27 20:37:28 UTC by t_ja ♦217
173848870
(Comments: 1)
lwfsu71
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO...
commented 2025-10-27 20:27:59 UTC by Comino ♦202
173795363
(Comments: 3)
NikaRriots
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Okay, yeah I was just checking because someone else was making mistakes with how access tags work a couple months back, but the way you've done it is good. Thanks for mapping!
commented 2025-10-27 20:26:35 UTC by RushMM ♦4
79172614
(Comments: 4)
JanFi
(Discussed changesets: 51)
Tja, die officiële aanduidingen zijn dikwijls twijfelachtig. In West-Vlaanderen heb je de rivier de IJzer (en niet de Ijzer zoals Google Maps ze noemt, en daar vind je dan dit staaltje:
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.0333831,2.85433,3a,75y,1...
commented 2025-10-27 20:15:40 UTC by JanFi ♦51
173854809
(Comments: 2)
橘ヒカリ
(Discussed changesets: 4)
http://www.360doc.com/content/25/1022/20/8481098_1163495248.shtml
commented 2025-10-27 20:12:53 UTC by 橘ヒカリ ♦37
173814143
(Comments: 1)
arihein2024
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello!

I see that you've added sidewalk:[side] tagging to one or more sidewalks. I haven't seen that tagging scheme before; I've only seen it used on roadways to indicate that there's a sidewalk to the left or right of the ...
commented 2025-10-27 20:04:03 UTC by MapAwayThePain ♦12
173855347
(Comments: 1)
Strongthany
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Please remove, I added address to wrong location.
commented 2025-10-27 20:02:10 UTC by Strongthany ♦3
173329364
(Comments: 1)
Sarca
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you please provide a link of some sort? Bing Maps says the shorter street to the south west is called Andonglaan, and the one you indicated Kenongolaan. Basically they are swapped.
Thank you!
commented 2025-10-27 19:48:27 UTC by VLD549 ♦307
173854017
(Comments: 1)
AmongusMan69420
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, thanks for your edit! I believe this street is still one-way for general traffic, even if buses can enter the other way. Could you explain a bit more about why you changed it just to double check?
commented 2025-10-27 19:45:51 UTC by Muzz17 ♦1
173806631
(Comments: 2)
Pomorze Zachonie
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Adresy poprawione - proszę o zapoznanie się z nimi w celu poprawy dalszego mapowania
commented 2025-10-27 19:44:20 UTC by bartgron ♦300
166004173
(Comments: 2)
MattyOh
(Discussed changesets: 4)
phodgking, we are allowed to use Ordnance Survey maps if they have the appropriate licence. There are two available as background layers in the iD editor used to make this edit.

"Ordnance Survey map" is commonly is used to refer to...
commented 2025-10-27 19:16:35 UTC by JassKurn ♦162
173384209
(Comments: 1)
Mohandev
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi Mohandev,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

On the ATM you added, the supermarket has already an ATM, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075450046

Emvee
commented 2025-10-27 19:14:09 UTC by emvee ♦393
173807991
(Comments: 1)
HunterFlower
(Discussed changesets: 1)
а зачем тег детского сада удалять?
commented 2025-10-27 19:09:10 UTC by literan ♦6,844
171470482
(Comments: 3)
Anas masuris
(Discussed changesets: 129)
Dzięki za szybką reakcję!!
Miłego wieczoru
commented 2025-10-27 19:09:03 UTC by bpiotrowicz86 ♦3
173853208
(Comments: 3)
Jose7
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i fakticzna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Agencja marketingowa"
---
(Auto-translation)
commented 2025-10-27 19:00:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173827909
(Comments: 2)
publicfriend
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello :)

thanks for helping keeping OSM up to date.

There's something that you could improve upon: Names.

I know OsmAnd offers to add a name to almost all objects it can add to the database but please don't add descript...
commented 2025-10-27 18:59:37 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
173848182
(Comments: 2)
Kin Sapalot
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Sorry, en bedankt!
Dan zal ik me ook gaan verdiepen in hoe ik die knooppunten goed kan zien en bewerken in josm.
commented 2025-10-27 18:58:06 UTC by Kin Sapalot ♦37
173829823
(Comments: 3)
Aleks-Berlin
(Discussed changesets: 143)
Hello. it seems you are right, the link seems to redirect to an english page.

regards
commented 2025-10-27 18:55:07 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173771351
(Comments: 1)
F-5 System
(Discussed changesets: 57)
привет! а он так называется? может, тогда название повесить

правда гуглом чет не гуглится...
commented 2025-10-27 18:52:48 UTC by literan ♦6,844
173852685
(Comments: 2)
Tulip Bloom Boutique
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tulip Bloom Boutique women's clothing and accessories store in West Des Moines IA"
commented 2025-10-27 18:48:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
X173848835
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Once again, please keep changesets small, it's like your 10th changeset that covers all of the atlantic
commented 2025-10-27 18:30:42 UTC by ilias_ ♦317
173764355
(Comments: 3)
Thomas-Munichways
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Vielen Dank, Thomas, habe das Tagging entsprechend geändert.
commented 2025-10-27 18:26:59 UTC by trialanderror ♦2
173848602
(Comments: 1)
StefanoHatari
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi in this changeset you dragged a lot of nodes out of place while trying to add a camera. This is the 2nd time you have done this.

Always check the Warning and Changes section to see what changes you have made before clicking publish!

...
commented 2025-10-27 18:20:41 UTC by MassCartog ♦217
165803756
(Comments: 3)
Could this be ad space
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Danke für die Antwort und die Bilder.
Leider gibt es meines Wissens nach kein etabliertes Tagging für Postschließfächer. Das wurde gelegentlich andiskutiert, aber nie zu Ende gebracht. Z. B. https://community.openstreetmap.org...
commented 2025-10-27 18:16:58 UTC by pyram ♦512
173636633
(Comments: 2)
akino_germany
(Discussed changesets: 21)
Du hast recht, dyke ist nicht ganz richtig, aber das beste was ich gefunden habe das auch eine Wassermanagementfunktion hat. man_made=embankment ist für einen Eisenbahn- oder Straßendamm, nicht für das Wassermanagement. waterway=dam e...
commented 2025-10-27 18:16:56 UTC by akino_germany ♦20
173843845
(Comments: 2)
onmaps
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Is deze instelling verifieerbaar in het veld... maw kun je aan de gevel zien wat er binnen voor activiteiten zijn?

Zo niet dan kan deze vermelding beter verwijderd worden. Graag reactie,

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-27 18:16:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173367090
(Comments: 2)
Radu Silveanu
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Buna seara, multumesc pentru mesaj si pentru link. Este greseala mea. Imi cer iertare. Imi cer iertare si pentru raspunsul intarziat.
commented 2025-10-27 18:13:00 UTC by Radu Silveanu ♦3
173824432
(Comments: 2)
Shyshka
(Discussed changesets: 53)
дякую
commented 2025-10-27 18:12:48 UTC by Shyshka ♦45
172249023
(Comments: 4)
Fractale
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour, il s'agit simplement d'un bon endroit pour ramacer des chataignes pendant la saison.
commented 2025-10-27 18:11:03 UTC by Fractale ♦1
173802539
(Comments: 8)
Nortix08
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Ich war eben vor Ort, es hat sich baulich nix geändert, es stehen auch keine verkehrszeichen für die Radwege, daher habe ich deine Änderung zurückgenom.
commented 2025-10-27 18:06:28 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413
173770454
(Comments: 1)
BrettG7
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi Brett,

Just a heads-up: you had already added The Dirty Duck pub in Inglewood in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173640872. As such I've deleted the one you added in this changeset.

Cheers :)
commented 2025-10-27 18:05:59 UTC by hoserab ♦207
173822850
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
User has been blocked, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18873
commented 2025-10-27 18:00:04 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173839737
(Comments: 1)
Zsolt Lazar
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Zdá sa, že tento changeset omylom vymazal niekoľko ciest alebo im zmenil názvy. Prosím, bolo by ho možné revertovať?
commented 2025-10-27 17:56:02 UTC by Rick Richards ♦52
173846878
(Comments: 1)
dobra mapa
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Cześć

Do Twojej edycji wkradł się drobny błąd - PL:rural oznacza obszar niezabudowany. Naprawiłem ten błąd, przy okazji zmieniając maxspeed:type na dużo bardziej popularny w okolicy znacznik source:maxspeed (oznaczają to samo). commented 2025-10-27 17:55:37 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
164647568
(Comments: 3)
Stadtigel
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Hei,

...na dann kommt das aus den Merkzettel, ich hab ja dienstlich Kontakt in Brandenburgische LfU, ins Schutzgebietskataster, da spreche ich das Thema Schutzgebietsgrenzen an Landesgrenzen mal an. Da gibt es einige Stellen mit Abweichungen.....
commented 2025-10-27 17:45:51 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,090
173797149
(Comments: 4)
Kamerijker
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Wel ik heb niets gedownload of gekopieerd, enkel geraadpleegd en approximatief overgezet op OSM.
Zal dit in het vervolg niet meer vermelden.
commented 2025-10-27 17:31:57 UTC by Kamerijker ♦5
173728198
(Comments: 1)
DaDapperMapper
(Discussed changesets: 17)
Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-08-01; Esri World Imagery; Mapillary
commented 2025-10-27 17:29:43 UTC by DaDapperMapper ♦17
173277730
(Comments: 4)
Mateusz Konieczny
(Discussed changesets: 551)
I am crestfallen to hear all of this guys.
I have put a lot of hours in, made many changesets and obviously some errors will have been made as well as misunderstanding of the best practice guidelines.

commented 2025-10-27 17:24:37 UTC by UtterClutter ♦37
173849174
(Comments: 1)
Ankon10
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi Ankon10, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 32 highway(s)
- 45 natural(s)

Could you ple...
commented 2025-10-27 17:21:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
163999792
(Comments: 6)
Ropino
(Discussed changesets: 187)
For me looks like 4*ALS (with the same space between)
plus: the 3th light from left: looks like a "Lead-in Light system (LDIN)"
plus: the (small) light in the middle: I don't know, what this is.

ref - good question: I know...
commented 2025-10-27 17:05:55 UTC by Ropino ♦393
166063719
(Comments: 1)
chap_parched_sir
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hallo,

du hast hier mehrere, sich schneidende Gebäude erzeugt. Bei den Reihenhäusern kann man entweder den gesamten Reihenhausblock als ein großes building=terrace angeben oder die einzelnen Einheiten als building=house + house...
commented 2025-10-27 17:03:24 UTC by Luzandro ♦946
173840537
(Comments: 1)
drlellinger
(Discussed changesets: 114)
Danke für deine Ergänzungen!

Denke bitte daran, wenn du Bürgersteige neu als eigene Wege ergänzt, dass du dann auch die sidewalk-Tags auf den Straßen von "yes" zu "separate" änderst. Auß...
commented 2025-10-27 17:01:09 UTC by flo2154 ♦56
173817909
(Comments: 3)
LizArtjuh
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
...
commented 2025-10-27 16:59:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
173789792
(Comments: 3)
Aleksei Besogonov
(Discussed changesets: 1)
The building outline is already tagged with the address. It just doesn't render so you can see it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173789792

commented 2025-10-27 16:54:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
173847648
(Comments: 2)
vipnuru
(Discussed changesets: 1)
For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Nuru massage service in Bangkok"
commented 2025-10-27 16:48:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173842245
(Comments: 4)
Manexfx
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hoi.. nou het is aardig gelukt.
Voor een trekpontje zijn aparte tags.
Iets met cable? Zit nu even op mn mobiel.
Wellicht even onder ferry kijken in de wiki.

Mapse

commented 2025-10-27 16:44:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173846815
(Comments: 2)
Leon_Elbe
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Kartenbearbeitungen: "Feuerhydrant mit unterirdischem Typ hinzugefügt, 100mm Durchmesser, Gehwegposition, an die Hauptwasserquelle angeschlossen"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here ...
commented 2025-10-27 16:37:25 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173009809
(Comments: 3)
ERU_Mentz
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Das Problem ist, dass das Tagging davon unter "Tagging für den Router" fällt (gerade für einen internen Router), da dieser "Weg" ja physisch nicht vorhanden ist (z.B. kann man die Fußwege mit der Bahnsteigfl&a...
commented 2025-10-27 16:21:00 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦232
173826130
(Comments: 2)
yanaaaa
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Ось приклад системного редагування, що мається на увазі:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173846415#map=16/47.91273/33.33782

Виставлено building=apartments у будинк...
commented 2025-10-27 16:18:58 UTC by i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH ♦55
173846053
(Comments: 2)
jelmerj
(Discussed changesets: 2)
reverted by changeset #173846350

Kijk even hier hoe de verschillende fietspaden worden getagd en ga svp niet van alles wijzigen zonder enige vervaring.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated,...
commented 2025-10-27 16:15:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173845903
(Comments: 1)
jelmerj
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback bicycle=no hoeft niet op een steps of footway Dat is default.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community

commented 2025-10-27 16:10:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173845595
(Comments: 2)
MainUpdater
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated road names to Inanda Dam Road, Eskebheni Road"
commented 2025-10-27 16:07:03 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173842499
(Comments: 2)
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale
(Discussed changesets: 430)
Bonjour,

Merci de votre alerte
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
commented 2025-10-27 16:01:01 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦258
173631568
(Comments: 2)
Stadtigel
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Hallo aceman444!

Thank you for your message!

Why does not make sense to have bench, table and site on the same node? It is a picnic site and it exists more as one table with more as one bench. If you want create every unique table and e...
commented 2025-10-27 15:49:01 UTC by Stadtigel ♦28
163057025
(Comments: 3)
Stadtigel
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Thank you very much for your notes! I will take that into account in the future.
commented 2025-10-27 15:46:02 UTC by Stadtigel ♦28
166026059
(Comments: 2)
Stadtigel
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Vielen Dank für deine Anmerkung! Ich werde mich bemühen, das in Zukunft zu berücksichtigen.
commented 2025-10-27 15:45:08 UTC by Stadtigel ♦28
173840538
(Comments: 1)
batıormanı
(Discussed changesets: 1)
You wrote “The campground has been permanently closed.” However, you added a guest house. Please write what you actually did in your changeset comments.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
commented 2025-10-27 15:42:50 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
173738686
(Comments: 4)
Tim Niblett
(Discussed changesets: 4)
You're right, I re-read it. I've removed all of the bikeways and checked the road tags for bike lanes.
commented 2025-10-27 15:38:09 UTC by Tim Niblett ♦4
170241101
(Comments: 2)
bpiotrowicz86
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Przepraszam za późną odpowiedź i za błędy.
Dziękuję za naukę.
commented 2025-10-27 15:34:06 UTC by bpiotrowicz86 ♦3
98891338
(Comments: 1)
d2z321e
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Kan je je de bron van het Elfpad nog herinneren?
commented 2025-10-27 15:23:50 UTC by djsa ♦22
173563041
(Comments: 3)
Michał Paluchowski
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Dziękuję!
commented 2025-10-27 15:14:20 UTC by bpiotrowicz86 ♦3
173841799
(Comments: 1)
Christoph Knoth
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community



commented 2025-10-27 15:13:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173799667
(Comments: 2)
user1572739
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Oops, gar nicht gesehen. Ich sehe gerade von meinem Balkon aus, wie die Leute von Norden kommend reihenweise blinken, bremsen und dann irritiert geradeaus zur Maria-Tusch-Straße weiterfahren. :-D Der separat gemappte Fußweg hat sich demna...
commented 2025-10-27 15:04:29 UTC by user1572739 ♦24
173830818
(Comments: 2)
Wander-Lux
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Der "Große Collmer Rundweg" hat das Wegsymbol "Weißer Grund mit gelben Querbalken". So ist auch die Wegmarkierung aktuell ausgeschildert. Diese Wegmarkierung und auch die aller anderen Wanderwege in dieserm Wandergebie...
commented 2025-10-27 14:54:33 UTC by Wander-Lux ♦3
173547777
(Comments: 2)
dmjab13
(Discussed changesets: 2)
i mean, sure, but the baseball fields look so pretty when i mark the outfield as sports centre and the dirt as the pitch, lol
commented 2025-10-27 14:51:17 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
X173810569
(Comments: 1)
aryan seetepalli
(Discussed changesets: 1)
please keep changes to one continent or area
commented 2025-10-27 14:49:36 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
173829102
(Comments: 1)
tordans
(Discussed changesets: 141)
Korrektur: Der Weg unter der Treppe ist vorhanden; das muss ich reverten…
commented 2025-10-27 14:48:13 UTC by tordans ♦421
173798913
(Comments: 6)
DeFra85
(Discussed changesets: 162)
"da durch foot=use_sidepath enorme Umwege genommen werden mussten." Das ist natürlich ein guter Grund korrigierend einzugreifen. Man könnte natürlich auch alle wichtigen Übergangsmöglichkeiten eintragen (Das wä...
commented 2025-10-27 14:34:01 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413
173761641
(Comments: 4)
SweetGIS
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Das Dreieck ist der Militärgemeinde und den Menschen, die in der Nähe leben, vor Ort bekannt. Ich werde es entfernen.
commented 2025-10-27 14:28:32 UTC by SweetGIS ♦3
173825115
(Comments: 2)
archie
(Discussed changesets: 288)
Det är ganska uppenbart att det inte finns några som helst spår kvar av järnvägssträckan. Detta kan lätt kontrolleras på marken eller på flygbildslagret på https://minkarta.lantmateriet.se/. Dess...
commented 2025-10-27 14:28:31 UTC by archie ♦1,355
173833213
(Comments: 1)
GodOrJuan
(Discussed changesets: 3)
actually, according to cadastre it's მე-6 ქუჩის I შესახვევი
https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal
commented 2025-10-27 14:27:16 UTC by yelisey90 ♦184
172857074
(Comments: 1)
ghowen
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3431012
commented 2025-10-27 14:23:55 UTC by o_andras ♦58
163766160
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 14:22:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173806662
(Comments: 3)
GKremp
(Discussed changesets: 8)
siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7926895/history #8
"name=Umweltzone Köln"

Gruß
Zrop
commented 2025-10-27 14:00:10 UTC by Zrop ♦106
173501187
(Comments: 2)
NKA
(Discussed changesets: 142)
Du har rett, Göteborg og Stockholm følger ikke de vanlige skriverådene. Bare endre til det du mener det skal være.
commented 2025-10-27 13:46:55 UTC by NKA ♦251
153081653
(Comments: 1)
Hundehalter
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hei,

das, was du als Gebäude erfasst hast, ist anscheinend nur noch das Fundament der Antenne. Das angrenzende Gebäude ist abgerissen. Bis 2021 stand es noch: https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/?layerIDs=237,9001,9000,550,159&visib...
commented 2025-10-27 13:36:22 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,090
164018763
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 13:22:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173835960
(Comments: 1)
rarad74
(Discussed changesets: 34)
Link-ul de pe A1 nu ocoleste giratoriul si intra direct pe DN7/DN1. Obligatoriu intra si in giratoriu, dar singura iesire posibila este prima din sensul giratoriu. Banda 1 a giratoriului este separata prin bariere de plastic
commented 2025-10-27 13:22:06 UTC by cripistipi ♦1
149815432
(Comments: 1)
Ieronimus
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Olá.
O caminho dos Promontórios está marcado com a sinalética oficial e o código PR1 LGA ?
commented 2025-10-27 13:14:45 UTC by Alexmol ♦101
173688256
(Comments: 2)
JJIglesias
(Discussed changesets: 130)
No tengo problema con eso, aunque para los efectos del INE siguen siendo poblaciones dispersas
commented 2025-10-27 13:13:46 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,210
173832058
(Comments: 1)
АСМ
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Что случилось с https://osm.org/way/148427950 ?Снесли?
commented 2025-10-27 13:12:55 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
164090628
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 12:53:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172427346
(Comments: 1)
Tewuzij
(Discussed changesets: 41)
Please don't edit `place=` and `name=` if you don't know them, and didn't read doucmentation. District Council districts are not `=suburb=` nor `=town` in HK.
commented 2025-10-27 12:52:56 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629
164217942
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 12:52:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
164389547
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 12:43:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173835469
(Comments: 1)
cripistipi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Salut. Link-ul de pe A1 nu ocoleste giratoriul si intra direct pe DN7/DN1. Obligatoriu intra si in giratoriu. Practic ai blocat intrare in giratoriu de pe A1. trebuia sa il lasi asa, deaorece acel mic link este neglijabil.
commented 2025-10-27 12:27:17 UTC by rarad74 ♦309
173785127
(Comments: 3)
younon3
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thank you for your answer!
In Sweden we only tend to use track for smaller roads. This one leads to several farms. I have changed it to unclassified. But thank you for noticing it wasn't there in the first place!
commented 2025-10-27 12:24:32 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦619
164430242
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 12:08:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
164478280
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 12:06:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172902841
(Comments: 1)
zemexpert
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👋 К сожалению Яндекс.Карты использовать нельзя.

Тем более у ГеоРеестра есть свой сайт, а не только страничка на яндекс.картах
commented 2025-10-27 12:04:37 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
172902438
(Comments: 1)
SimonLen888
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👋 К сожалению Яндекс.Карты использовать нельзя
commented 2025-10-27 12:01:59 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
173764883
(Comments: 6)
s8evq
(Discussed changesets: 57)
Na wat verder onderzoek bleek dat ik van Grote Routepaden VZW de GPX gekregen had van de GR 5 zoals die begin volgend jaar hertekend zal worden, niet zoals de situatie momenteel ter plaatse is. Ik heb al mijn bewerkingen teruggedraaid. Zo zie je maar...
commented 2025-10-27 12:00:22 UTC by s8evq ♦192
172900339
(Comments: 1)
Арсениус
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👋 После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его

Ещё, после того как нарисовали здание не забывайт...
commented 2025-10-27 11:59:47 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
173834322
(Comments: 2)
davi lucas
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Aqui está um comentário de amostra com base nas suas edições do mapa: "Adicionada estrada principal"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added trunk road"
commented 2025-10-27 11:57:03 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
146934917
(Comments: 1)
Milancer
(Discussed changesets: 44)
Hi! Why were the following relations deleted as part of this change?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1757638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1757766
commented 2025-10-27 11:54:26 UTC by emarv ♦20
173706104
(Comments: 3)
fredlenoir
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Sur le wiki d'osm , on préconise access=no + bus=designated (cas de figure cidessus); motor_vehicle=no + bus=designated when shared by bicycles (cas pour le quai des ardennes) . utiliser highway= service n'est pas à faire se...
commented 2025-10-27 11:53:26 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15
172900925
(Comments: 1)
VAZ2106_E298RC_58
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👋 После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его

Ещё, в правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настр...
commented 2025-10-27 11:48:41 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
173564502
(Comments: 2)
VatskiKvas
(Discussed changesets: 1)
принял! спасибо
commented 2025-10-27 11:39:37 UTC by VatskiKvas ♦1
164420845
(Comments: 1)
Szymson
(Discussed changesets: 274)
Na terenie woj. zachodniopomorskiego raczej nie powinno być kaszubskiej nazwy. Nie pojawia się w zachodniopomorskiej uchwale
commented 2025-10-27 11:34:06 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
173766175
(Comments: 2)
Prasanna Msamy
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
commented 2025-10-27 11:14:45 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦10
173761688
(Comments: 1)
personne14
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour,

La piscine que vous avez tracée n’existe plus sous cette forme : vous avez utilisé des images datant de 2022 où une piscine temporaire (probablement gonflable ?) est présente. Or les objets tempor...
commented 2025-10-27 11:10:25 UTC by Ltrlg ♦79
173631450
(Comments: 2)
Thundafox
(Discussed changesets: 8)
I added the Informations, the App I uploaded the waypoints with did miss to include the info.
commented 2025-10-27 11:02:01 UTC by Thundafox ♦3
X173831811
(Comments: 1)
Ivan_Povodlo
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello Ivan_Povodlo, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locat...
commented 2025-10-27 11:01:07 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173816374
(Comments: 1)
Derkoenig
(Discussed changesets: 24)
Hi,
das neue Stellwerk ist elektronisch. Elektromechanische Stellwerke werden seit 50 Jahren nicht mehr gebaut :)

commented 2025-10-27 10:56:09 UTC by gallseife ♦45
173808818
(Comments: 1)
queerthoughts
(Discussed changesets: 19)
super, dankjewel!
commented 2025-10-27 10:42:55 UTC by Joske1020 ♦4
173825033
(Comments: 1)
taihoku
(Discussed changesets: 20)
抱歉畫到一半先傳了 QQ
這邊新五路拉開的原因是因為交流道改善工程後,中間橋樑佔用因而道路往外拓
我後面的 changeset 畫完後應該可以理解,也可以看一下 Mapillary

https://www.openst...
commented 2025-10-27 10:38:48 UTC by Littlebtc ♦64
173258858
(Comments: 1)
jonathand299
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Just got here to see if a shop was already on the map.
Great to see you updated the shop info here! Happy mapping.
commented 2025-10-27 10:29:17 UTC by Lachgast ♦124
173827916
(Comments: 2)
HennyT
(Discussed changesets: 1)
sport = billiards toegevoegd
commented 2025-10-27 10:29:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173830319
(Comments: 2)
victor0174
(Discussed changesets: 1)
En me basant sur tes modifications de carte dans cet ensemble de changements, j'ai rédigé une suggestion pour ce à quoi un commentaire pourrait ressembler : "Mise à jour des attributs du tunnel, suppression des i...
commented 2025-10-27 10:26:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
170666825
(Comments: 2)
sim6
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Ops, thanks. I fixed it via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173830524
commented 2025-10-27 10:23:02 UTC by sim6 ♦17
173810929
(Comments: 2)
meeuw
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Geen probleem, ik waardeer het zeer dat je verbeteringen maakt.

Ik had inderdaad deze notitie eerder moeten toevoegen om het duidelijk te maken.
commented 2025-10-27 10:17:25 UTC by meeuw ♦1
173706768
(Comments: 3)
caboulot
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Pour info des images aériennes plus récentes sont disponibles ici et dans plusieurs autres départements : Ortho Express IGN 2025. On peut y voir que la route a changé à cet endroit.
commented 2025-10-27 10:14:13 UTC by Syl ♦998
173332203
(Comments: 1)
BMoney2
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Why did you mark the current Shands Bridge as motorway? It's not grade separated from local traffic.
commented 2025-10-27 10:13:19 UTC by OrdinaryScarlett ♦14
X173791201
(Comments: 1)
3D打印
(Discussed changesets: 3)
重复了,这里实在太多个白须公礁的点了,不要再加了。
commented 2025-10-27 09:53:52 UTC by Xcbino ♦1
164576652
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 09:50:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173712694
(Comments: 2)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654
(Discussed changesets: 15)
ist korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.
commented 2025-10-27 09:48:27 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦10
173018158
(Comments: 2)
Beroul_fm
(Discussed changesets: 1)
La fontaine est à l' entrée du parc ,les heures d' ouverture sont tous les jours sauf le lundi comme indiqué dans ma modif . les infos ont été vérifiés sur place. En janvier je tracerais les ...
commented 2025-10-27 09:47:01 UTC by Beroul_fm ♦1
173710740
(Comments: 2)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Ok, meistens merkt man solche ungewollten Verschiebungen nicht.
commented 2025-10-27 09:43:32 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦10
164581431
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-27 09:41:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173827839
(Comments: 1)
in-map
(Discussed changesets: 1)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-27 09:40:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173802593
(Comments: 1)
DeFra85
(Discussed changesets: 162)
Ein Wegweiser zum Recyclinghof ist kein Touristischer Wegweiser. Der Fehler liegt hier wohl tiefer.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173802593

commented 2025-10-27 09:39:16 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,413
173665577
(Comments: 6)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Ok, sorry.
commented 2025-10-27 09:35:55 UTC by FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 ♦10
173611362
(Comments: 3)
Nar_ach
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Hi aceman44, thank you for making the corrections on lane numbers. I will be more careful on lanes and lane-specific tagging in my future edits.
Regarding the oneway tag, it is not wrong, but redundant as documented in the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.o...
commented 2025-10-27 09:34:58 UTC by Nar_ach ♦11
173254702
(Comments: 2)
Kaduna
(Discussed changesets: 20)
Hi GrabMY_ainayusof, thank you for making the corrections with your local insights.
commented 2025-10-27 09:33:03 UTC by Kaduna ♦25
173824876
(Comments: 6)
Mikulic Fahrschule Zürich
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi UT93,
ja, gerne, ich habe ausschließlich die Node der Fahrschule mir angeschaut. Danke!
commented 2025-10-27 09:32:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173826727
(Comments: 2)
Tisataloma88
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Adresnode nr 4 hersteld. Die bestaat nog volgens het Kadaster.

commented 2025-10-27 09:20:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173822017
(Comments: 2)
Carlavissers
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Ik heb wel een route gemaakt over de markt. Of deze route geschikt is voor hulpdiensten is up to you. emergency=yes ontbreekt dus nog.
commented 2025-10-27 09:14:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173825225
(Comments: 3)
BEYOND Personal Trainer Amsterdam
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Wellicht even uitzoeken via hun site, want de vermeldingen zitten elkaar misschien in de weg.
De info heb ik wel samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode 303A
commented 2025-10-27 09:09:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173708408
(Comments: 2)
Keek4600
(Discussed changesets: 24)
Ich habe die Funktionen jetzt auf Gebäudeteile gelegt.
commented 2025-10-27 09:01:32 UTC by Keek4600 ♦2
166515142
(Comments: 2)
Vinber
(Discussed changesets: 14)
salut,
tu as raison, je penche pour une erreur de manip lors de l'usage de mapcomplete !
merci du signalement,

retiré https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173827128
commented 2025-10-27 09:01:16 UTC by Vinber ♦811
173076786
(Comments: 1)
Hung Tran 9x0
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Vậy xóa luôn relation 9802982 nhé bạn.
commented 2025-10-27 09:00:57 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦248
173826395
(Comments: 1)
CMCotes
(Discussed changesets: 1)
In this changeset and the previous changeset you have modified almost 13,000 nodes, adding a "source" tag. I don't know how you managed to do that as the changeset comment clearly indicates that you wanted to do something else instead!...
commented 2025-10-27 08:57:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,479
173826804
(Comments: 2)
tanksnyc
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Environmental services company"
commented 2025-10-27 08:54:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173813653
(Comments: 2)
NikoStruiksma
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Aangepast naar adresnode.. office=consulting

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-27 08:49:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173523089
(Comments: 3)
Department of Municipalities and Transport Abu_Dhabi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thank you for your clarification! Best regards, Maryna
commented 2025-10-27 08:46:03 UTC by Maryna Makarava ♦17
173706348
(Comments: 2)
f_gonella
(Discussed changesets: 47)
Ciao @totera, hai ragione, l’utilizzo di parking_space sembra essere la soluzione migliore. Il parking_lot deve invece contenere la strada di accesso per ragioni di routing, così mi è stato segnalato dai tool di diagnostica.
commented 2025-10-27 08:39:11 UTC by f_gonella ♦38
173337857
(Comments: 2)
RI9
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Most je otvorený.
Starý most je zatvorený - neprejazdný.
commented 2025-10-27 08:38:13 UTC by RI9 ♦1
173682351
(Comments: 2)
Dornbacher
(Discussed changesets: 23)
sorry & danke für Hinweis und Korrektur!
commented 2025-10-27 08:35:43 UTC by Dornbacher ♦12
173628669
(Comments: 2)
Geopartner
(Discussed changesets: 3)
It's actually an error, due to too much copy-pasting... thanks for reporting it!
commented 2025-10-27 08:33:11 UTC by Geopartner ♦3
173759397
(Comments: 2)
hmkaiser
(Discussed changesets: 100)
Vektor-Längen von mehreren Kilometern, hier sogar > 99 km, behindern, bzw. unterbinden eine detaillierte Erfassung, Pflege von Eigenschaften, die diesem Vektor zugeordnet werden können.
Viele Grüße!
commented 2025-10-27 08:26:11 UTC by hmkaiser ♦57
173718224
(Comments: 4)
Marco Ubaghs (VRZL)
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Dag Eggie,

Ik heb chatGPT gebruikt en deze gaf fire_service aan.
motor_vehicle=private heb ik niet toegevoegd, geen idee hoe die erin komt.
Aanpassing heeft in ieder geval gewerkt, navigatie in onze brandweervoertuigen gebruikt nu deze r...
commented 2025-10-27 08:16:57 UTC by Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) ♦8
172263861
(Comments: 2)
7beren
(Discussed changesets: 14)
I agree with you. You can alter the nam.
commented 2025-10-27 08:14:04 UTC by 7beren ♦4
173745183
(Comments: 1)
Prince majid
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, this changeset completely changed the characteristics of this node. Can you please revert?
commented 2025-10-27 07:59:36 UTC by vricciardulli ♦22
173815046
(Comments: 1)
bartgron
(Discussed changesets: 166)
Dzięki
commented 2025-10-27 07:55:49 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
173819663
(Comments: 1)
Banibatiti
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello Banibatiti, you have created duplicates of this office at different locations. Which is the right one?
commented 2025-10-27 07:49:30 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦108
146907301
(Comments: 2)
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale
(Discussed changesets: 430)
Bonjour,

En effet, désolé pour l'erreur, c'est corrigé
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
commented 2025-10-27 07:46:17 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦258
173795074
(Comments: 5)
vectorial8192
(Discussed changesets: 61)
That's here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158183482
commented 2025-10-27 07:44:46 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,629
173823133
(Comments: 3)
Promtechnotreid
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Просто чтобы помочь проиллюстрировать, что я имею в виду, вот как ваше описание могло бы выглядеть в более нейтральной, фактической форм...
commented 2025-10-27 07:06:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173344325
(Comments: 3)
SweetGIS
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo, danke für Ihre Antwort. Was ist denn die Quelle von den "Kommentaren anderer Nutzer"? Hier in diesem Changeset steht ja nur "source=local knowledge".
commented 2025-10-27 06:44:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173777691
(Comments: 3)
SweetGIS
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hallo, danke für Ihre Antwort. Was ist denn die Quelle von den "Kommentaren anderer Nutzer"? Hier in diesem Changeset steht ja nur "source=local knowledge". Mir ist dieses "Dürer-Dreieck" oder jetzt "D&uum...
commented 2025-10-27 06:44:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173822458
(Comments: 2)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822516
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:37:32 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822439
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822466
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:35:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822446
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822461
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:34:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822406
(Comments: 2)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822453
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:34:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822421
(Comments: 2)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822449
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:34:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822427
(Comments: 2)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822441
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:34:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822359
(Comments: 2)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
Consulte https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
---
Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-...
commented 2025-10-27 06:33:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173816805
(Comments: 1)
sintia323
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003899336/history/27). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/change...
commented 2025-10-27 06:30:23 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64
173822306
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822317
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:29:40 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822297
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822310
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:29:25 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822284
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822301
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:29:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822275
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822288
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:28:51 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822261
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822274
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:28:26 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822255
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822260
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:28:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822234
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822239
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:27:32 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822206
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822233
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:27:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822194
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822215
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:26:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822180
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822210
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:26:31 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822071
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822201
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:26:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822088
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822191
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:25:46 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822107
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822187
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:25:37 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822172
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822182
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:25:24 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821509
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822176
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:25:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821525
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822173
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:24:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821563
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822170
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:24:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821570
(Comments: 3)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822164
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:24:32 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821615
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822158
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:24:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821631
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822154
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:24:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821636
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822151
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:23:52 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821641
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822146
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:23:40 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821650
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822138
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:23:28 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821655
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822134
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:23:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821713
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822128
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:23:00 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821723
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822121
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:22:47 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821728
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822116
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:22:35 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821738
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822113
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:22:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821772
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822106
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:22:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821779
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822104
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:21:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821820
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822100
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:21:47 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821845
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822094
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:21:34 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821899
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822089
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:21:22 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821918
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822072
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:20:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821765
(Comments: 1)
Tomasz_R
(Discussed changesets: 34)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260855443

Pozdrawia...
commented 2025-10-27 06:20:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173821924
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822068
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:20:47 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173822053
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822060
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:20:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173821949
(Comments: 1)
hefyomudro
(Discussed changesets: 45)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822054
where the changeset comment is:
Remove vandalism
commented 2025-10-27 06:20:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173207703
(Comments: 3)
Eduardo Saverin
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Thanks for your reply.

When used together with route=ferry access tags indicate which modes of transport are allowed to use the ferry.

Cars and motorcycles can't drive underwater but they can drive on and off the ship.

Ple...
commented 2025-10-27 05:32:16 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦163
173778829
(Comments: 1)
cnvery
(Discussed changesets: 37)
怎麼把胡適公園的Wikidata被移除了,沒有恢復
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173778829

commented 2025-10-27 05:24:49 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,512
173782493
(Comments: 1)
f4phantom
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Merhaba. Kapatılan hesabınızdan(uid:23189629) eklediğiniz alan(way/1424343814) bir hobi bahçesi gibi duruyor. Eğer bu alana "Arif Coşkun'un Bağ Yeri" yazmanızın sebebi sadece bu alanın sahibini belirtmek ise bu yanlı...
commented 2025-10-27 05:21:05 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
173814673
(Comments: 1)
johanbont
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Bonjour, Il n'y a aucun intérêt à ajouter un tag addr:street si l'adresse à déjà une relation Associated Street. Différents sujets sur le forum expliquent les différentes manière...
commented 2025-10-27 05:18:43 UTC by blm07 ♦5
173737916
(Comments: 12)
hatochan
(Discussed changesets: 21)
夜の見込みでしたが、時間が取れましたので当該の5軒に関して復元を行いました。
追加の苦言になり恐縮ですが、建物が変化して更新する際は、近くにあるという理由でウェイをそ...
commented 2025-10-27 05:15:58 UTC by 大山かなめ ♦62
59137909
(Comments: 2)
MadelNL
(Discussed changesets: 31)
Luc,
Dank voor het aanpassen, ik denk dat ik gewoon een fout heb gemaakt en dat ik er idd de tag viewpoint aan had willen hangen.
Op Mapillary plaats ik foto's onder de naam "madel" hier inmiddels onder de naam MadelNL, dus die s...
commented 2025-10-27 04:53:31 UTC by MadelNL ♦71
173757586
(Comments: 3)
Yukiroshi
(Discussed changesets: 18)
A tutaj jest oryginalny changeset, bo w tym tylko poprawiłem na szybko w iD.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173671436
commented 2025-10-27 03:51:00 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦24
171984822
(Comments: 8)
Michael N
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Thanks for the clarification. Just to be clear, when I said “treated as a public street,” I wasn’t referring to ownership — only that it’s listed in the city’s GIS as a named street and used for addresses. I unders...
commented 2025-10-27 03:29:27 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124
173811964
(Comments: 4)
ion_chi
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Yes, exactly. No problem
commented 2025-10-27 01:57:52 UTC by ion_chi ♦35
173816935
(Comments: 1)
olo81
(Discussed changesets: 100)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260590012
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
commented 2025-10-27 01:11:30 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173792705
(Comments: 1)
user_5359
(Discussed changesets: 388)
That would be my typo 😆 Good catch, thanks!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173792705

commented 2025-10-27 01:09:50 UTC by Kinsio ♦24
172679720
(Comments: 1)
Michael N
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Soden Place should be listed as a pedestrian street — it’s shown in the city’s GIS map and has properties that use that address.
commented 2025-10-27 00:28:29 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124
173794255
(Comments: 1)
vnoixopj
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18871
commented 2025-10-27 00:05:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,029
173781693
(Comments: 1)
BakedCake02
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Edgeroi is already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5793377 as a place=hamlet. I've reverted this change since it created a duplicate place for Edgeroi.
commented 2025-10-27 00:04:57 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173781685
(Comments: 1)
Jasonl1111
(Discussed changesets: 1)
unit 3 is already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12416900561 and this address is already mapped as addr:unit=1.

I've reverted this change.
commented 2025-10-27 00:02:04 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173531763
(Comments: 2)
donovaly
(Discussed changesets: 37)
Yes, I meant uic_ref. Thanks for your fix.
commented 2025-10-26 23:59:19 UTC by donovaly ♦40
173791546
(Comments: 1)
bryanf__
(Discussed changesets: 6)
you can add multiple buildings in one changeset, then save at the end rather than creating a changeset for each building.
commented 2025-10-26 23:50:37 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
173465063
(Comments: 1)
KB-01
(Discussed changesets: 35)
This changeset messed up the turn restrictions at Wootton Parkway & Fleet Street, though some popular routers were still able to guess what was intended. I fixed the turn restrictions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173815915 .
commented 2025-10-26 23:48:14 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦73
173807341
(Comments: 1)
LovelyPL
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Odkleiłem plac zabaw od linii energetycznej co by nie było dymu o to.

Przeglądałem dostępne zdjęcia i rendery tego co ma być na tym osiedlu i prawdopodobnie i tak trzeba będzie przy nowszym orto poprzestawiać choćby właśnie plac za...
commented 2025-10-26 23:36:14 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦551
173658077
(Comments: 1)
Dimfsic4554f576
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
commented 2025-10-26 23:33:30 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
173621969
(Comments: 1)
qaz909
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Не вносите личные данные в OSM
commented 2025-10-26 23:31:45 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
173589499
(Comments: 1)
anon94089323
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Подозреваю в левом верхнем углу вы прихватили лишний кусок дороги. Исправил, проверьте

И ещё. В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «...
commented 2025-10-26 23:28:39 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
173808994
(Comments: 1)
Rtydtydl
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Ta nazwa ulicy jest nieprawidłowa
commented 2025-10-26 22:49:35 UTC by bartgron ♦300
X173683055
(Comments: 1)
lbellomo
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hi, were each of these checked before making this change? It seems like you have, but an edit focused on a couple of tags and this wide often ends up being an automated edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: h...
commented 2025-10-26 22:36:40 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
173809414
(Comments: 2)
kevin open street
(Discussed changesets: 1)
The chance of it being re-added is very unlikely. The habitat/environment was restored.
commented 2025-10-26 22:36:32 UTC by matthewfecica ♦6
173789932
(Comments: 1)
ADHBEKB
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi mate, please don't upload changesets where your changes span large areas as you have in the last few uploads, they make it very difficult for local mappers to keep up to date on updates in their local area, thanks :)

https://wiki.opens...
commented 2025-10-26 22:29:32 UTC by ExoMal ♦38
129445821
(Comments: 3)
Dodko
(Discussed changesets: 39)
Naopak, terrace sa dava vtedy, ked v OSM je jeden dom reprezentujuci viacere domy v radovej zastavbe. Ale ked ich uz rozdelime (napr. na umiestnenie adries), ma to byt building=house.
commented 2025-10-26 22:28:01 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699
173804227
(Comments: 2)
pan_borsuk
(Discussed changesets: 72)
thank You 4 lesson :-). i was confused how tu mark it.
commented 2025-10-26 22:20:25 UTC by pan_borsuk ♦61
173697868
(Comments: 1)
MKT HPG
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, when adding links to OSM, please don't add utm tags to the URL
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173697868

commented 2025-10-26 22:11:28 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,384
163916526
(Comments: 2)
Henten Človek
(Discussed changesets: 7)
A preco ste znicili jednotlive budovy, z ktorych sa OC sklada?
A preco ste zrusili kvalitnejsie udaje a nahradili bodmi bez udajov, ako napr. Tesco? Trochu pozerajte co robite.
commented 2025-10-26 22:11:23 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699
173643356
(Comments: 1)
RLakhani
(Discussed changesets: 24)
So the road that links Narowal and Dera Baba Nank isn't a highway? The road that's called "Guru Nanak Highway" is merely a service road? By the way, It's connected to Narowal Road, which is a Primary road. This definitely des...
commented 2025-10-26 21:54:27 UTC by Jacksonville ♦20
140719418
(Comments: 1)
mapperue
(Discussed changesets: 266)
Budova v budove? Neviem aky zmysel mala tato zmena. Myslim, ze predosly stav bol spravnejsi.
commented 2025-10-26 21:49:42 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699
173798885
(Comments: 2)
Fskrid
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hey eggie, the entrance reception is where I put the mark. Cheers, F
commented 2025-10-26 21:47:20 UTC by Fskrid ♦1
173796542
(Comments: 1)
shubha jayant
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, I have reverted your changes to Sydney Olympic Park suburb.
commented 2025-10-26 21:46:10 UTC by nevw ♦2,063
171206719
(Comments: 2)
Selina576
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I'll be honest I didn't even know you could plot routes on here (still very new to the mapping thing). Guess I know what to work on next - thanks for your advice! - Isobel :)
commented 2025-10-26 21:42:01 UTC by Selina576 ♦2
173810899
(Comments: 5)
GewoonStephan
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Ik zal het over een paar dagen eens bekijken, zo nodig pas ik het dan wel aan. Thanks!
commented 2025-10-26 21:28:10 UTC by GewoonStephan ♦4
173768160
(Comments: 2)
MWpg
(Discussed changesets: 3)
❤️
commented 2025-10-26 21:15:27 UTC by MWpg ♦2
173787275
(Comments: 2)
LucGommans
(Discussed changesets: 29)
Merci! Though I knew of this

I'm just trying pruning some of the most ridiculous ones. I can't prove that there exists no grandma living in Morschenich that calls one half of the field between Petershof and B264 "Unter Büna...
commented 2025-10-26 21:12:40 UTC by LucGommans ♦71
173808825
(Comments: 1)
Makeena
(Discussed changesets: 41)
Actual changes in SE quarter of frame
commented 2025-10-26 21:08:19 UTC by Makeena ♦43
168729598
(Comments: 1)
Agnes_baby
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi, are you sure about the buttons you are selecting in StreetComplete? I can tell that these roads are https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=asphalt not https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=paving%20stones
can you clarify?
commented 2025-10-26 20:56:34 UTC by Enock4seth ♦582
167915976
(Comments: 1)
Agnes_baby
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi Agnes_baby, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you clarify why you changed valid & verified existing `building=*` tags on multiple buildings to shed/hut/detached/apartment. Buildings such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155291679 and https://w...
commented 2025-10-26 20:48:22 UTC by Enock4seth ♦582
173811008
(Comments: 3)
esaulenka
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Block A and B markings are necessary for distinguishing of the two buildings, that otherwise share the same address(4 Kedar st).
commented 2025-10-26 20:44:58 UTC by Fraxi ♦169
169582168
(Comments: 7)
Grzegorz_Kujawa
(Discussed changesets: 21)
Od strony Romera nie ma znaku D-40. Z drugiej strony (od Biedronki) nie ma przejazdu na wprost (stoją stałe słupki), a omijając skwer zieleni (przy Akademii Psyche) na wyjeździe stoi znak D-41. Zmień na "service", bo faktycznie bardz...
commented 2025-10-26 20:41:41 UTC by Grzegorz_Kujawa ♦35
173507951
(Comments: 3)
Naturhund
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo Naturhund,

vielen Dank für die Info. Die Freigaben habe ich soeben entsprechend erfasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173811472

Viele Grüße
whb
commented 2025-10-26 20:38:53 UTC by whb ♦633
173810887
(Comments: 1)
Matt McCutchen
(Discussed changesets: 53)
I'm guessing the error was caused by TIGER misalignment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup/Alignment) and the TIGER tags were intended to apply to the northern way, so I moved the TIGER tags rather than just deleting them, FWIW.
commented 2025-10-26 20:16:56 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦73
173475790
(Comments: 1)
MirkoOSM
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Moin!
Hier ist ein einzelner Stellplatz mitten auf der Straße gelandet. War das Absicht? Auf dem Luftbild sieht man den zumindest nicht.


VG
geomaniX
commented 2025-10-26 20:00:23 UTC by geomaniX ♦45
173577126
(Comments: 3)
Fabe56
(Discussed changesets: 32)
Corrigé, merci ;)
commented 2025-10-26 19:50:39 UTC by Fabe56 ♦44
173771079
(Comments: 1)
Elmiina
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Moi, laajensit metsää alueelle jossa näytäisi olevan nyt sorakuoppaa ks. esim. mapboxin ilmakuvat
commented 2025-10-26 19:48:28 UTC by Larmax ♦290
173789185
(Comments: 1)
Poncratis
(Discussed changesets: 4)
For your information, this changeset was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173801587
commented 2025-10-26 19:47:52 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦108
173727627
(Comments: 4)
Halfdeaf007
(Discussed changesets: 12)
I didn't say that you can't, I said that it's less detail to have it where the nodes intersect. Do you have a good reason for why less detail would be preferable?
commented 2025-10-26 19:45:56 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦53
173743148
(Comments: 1)
Yaa2Darko
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi, thanks for mapping. This looks more commercial, especially on the eastern part.
commented 2025-10-26 19:41:23 UTC by Enock4seth ♦582
173788559
(Comments: 1)
DD_FFO
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13257826765:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren u...
commented 2025-10-26 19:38:15 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
171383285
(Comments: 2)
l3mon1zer
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Absolut richtig, danke, habs angepasst.
commented 2025-10-26 19:38:02 UTC by l3mon1zer ♦2
173777095
(Comments: 1)
JeffKirk
(Discussed changesets: 1)
#TIP: driveways typically are not named, but you could add your address to the building so software can route you to your home.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173777095
...
commented 2025-10-26 19:33:06 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
173537705
(Comments: 4)
Derbeth
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Koparki też nie było.
commented 2025-10-26 19:29:07 UTC by Adam_Piszczek ♦178
173807125
(Comments: 1)
GewoonStephan
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke.
oneway=no is al default overigens.
Gr eggie
commented 2025-10-26 19:28:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173809145
(Comments: 2)
Дудом
(Discussed changesets: 1)
На основі ваших змін у цій зміні, я склав пропозицію щодо того, яким міг би бути коментар: "Оновлено використання землі на сільськогосп...
commented 2025-10-26 19:26:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173176925
(Comments: 1)
Gfgfgfgfgflkmvkhfhjiteqanjkkfcsipjgd
(Discussed changesets: 26)
Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node.
commented 2025-10-26 19:21:26 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018
173148576
(Comments: 1)
Gfgfgfgfgflkmvkhfhjiteqanjkkfcsipjgd
(Discussed changesets: 26)
Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node.
commented 2025-10-26 19:20:46 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018
173149474
(Comments: 1)
Gfgfgfgfgflkmvkhfhjiteqanjkkfcsipjgd
(Discussed changesets: 26)
Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node.
commented 2025-10-26 19:20:31 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018
173149710
(Comments: 1)
Gfgfgfgfgflkmvkhfhjiteqanjkkfcsipjgd
(Discussed changesets: 26)
Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node.
commented 2025-10-26 19:20:19 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018
173758130
(Comments: 3)
aprilfrisch
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Für OSM muss man auch mal buddeln ;-)
commented 2025-10-26 19:01:54 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
168607496
(Comments: 5)
Drevviken65
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Även den blev reverterad. Gick genom alla ändringar han har gort (inte så många), blev en eller annan till...
commented 2025-10-26 18:56:12 UTC by Fjellrev ♦15
170330758
(Comments: 5)
_torsten_
(Discussed changesets: 43)
Ok, hab ich so gemacht. Evtl nicht ganz perfekt je nach Umfang der Forstarbeiten.
commented 2025-10-26 18:53:49 UTC by cxfahrer2 ♦1
173739193
(Comments: 1)
drebelo40
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi,
could you explain what this sign shows? The tags are not sufficient to tell.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13255172612
commented 2025-10-26 18:46:14 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
173801815
(Comments: 5)
eggie
(Discussed changesets: 356)
Ok, ik zal waterway onthouden.

Middenstuk is maandag volledig weg, ze zijn halverwege momenteel.

Excuses dat ik je veel werk heb bezorgd.
commented 2025-10-26 18:37:00 UTC by GewoonStephan ♦4
173786618
(Comments: 2)
Dillen GJ
(Discussed changesets: 62)
Ok prima opgelost dan A67-A67
commented 2025-10-26 18:36:58 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦42
173806509
(Comments: 3)
GewoonStephan
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Sorry, thanks voor de aanvullingen.
Dit zal ik tzt een keer doen.
commented 2025-10-26 18:24:52 UTC by GewoonStephan ♦4
173799306
(Comments: 1)
Koler75
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-26 18:17:05 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173802579
(Comments: 1)
pa3weg
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community



commented 2025-10-26 18:16:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
169898133
(Comments: 2)
SKald
(Discussed changesets: 21)
Keine Ursache.
Happy mapping!
commented 2025-10-26 18:11:28 UTC by SKald ♦37
173791099
(Comments: 2)
ICT_maps
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Looks like it got dragged and merged. Un-merged.
commented 2025-10-26 18:09:12 UTC by ICT_maps ♦6
173291500
(Comments: 4)
Midas_Broken_Touch
(Discussed changesets: 3)
As described, keys were used in these imports whose meanings were not defined. Since the (presumed) plants are actually well described in the wiki, the need for new keys is of course questionable. But enjoy your holiday first, that's the priorit...
commented 2025-10-26 18:05:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173539227
(Comments: 2)
GKremp
(Discussed changesets: 8)
ist wieder korrigiert
commented 2025-10-26 18:00:48 UTC by GKremp ♦6
173766208
(Comments: 1)
proemr
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Merhaba. Metro hattındakidaki hatayı düzelttiğiniz için teşekkürler. Düzeltirken ilişkinin bütünlüğü bozulmuş. Onu da düzeltebilir misiniz? Şu ilişkiye tıkladığınızda kopuk kısmı gör...
commented 2025-10-26 17:56:21 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
173805995
(Comments: 1)
Mario26mario
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc...
commented 2025-10-26 17:51:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173623270
(Comments: 3)
Gerhard42
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Alles gut :)

kenn ich
commented 2025-10-26 17:49:55 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
173800373
(Comments: 2)
GKremp
(Discussed changesets: 8)
sorry, das war nicht gewollt
ist korrigiert

Gruß
Günther
commented 2025-10-26 17:49:19 UTC by GKremp ♦6
173797196
(Comments: 1)
mdavids
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Ik geloof dat de juiste term 'kazemat' is.
commented 2025-10-26 17:48:57 UTC by mdavids ♦6
173805840
(Comments: 1)
tg4567
(Discussed changesets: 25)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173805840
commented 2025-10-26 17:38:35 UTC by tg4567 ♦35
173795907
(Comments: 1)
mwald
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo,

Beim Einzeichnen bitte darauf achten, dass die Gebäude rechtwinklig sind. Diese Garagen haben zum Teil schiefe Wände. ID kann dies Drücken von q automatisch erledigen. Ggf. andere Häuser etwas verschieben, die Garage...
commented 2025-10-26 17:32:30 UTC by limes11 ♦962
153791714
(Comments: 4)
MappSurfer
(Discussed changesets: 49)
Hallo Mappsurfer
Du hast bei einigen Wegweisern ein fixme mit namen und position eingetragen. Darf man wissen, wie du auf die Namen gekommen bist?
commented 2025-10-26 17:29:24 UTC by Piagno ♦112
173805453
(Comments: 1)
Pivot007
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Ruim
commented 2025-10-26 17:28:06 UTC by Gustav Maps ♦1
173714011
(Comments: 1)
GKremp
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Hallo GKremp,
warum ergänzt Du an Straßen/Wege ""bridge:name" ? ""bridge:name" kommt nur an Straßen/Wege wo die Brücke nicht als separat gemapptes Bauwerk "man_made=bridge" gemappt ist....
commented 2025-10-26 17:27:01 UTC by Zrop ♦106
173797795
(Comments: 4)
GewoonStephan
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Yep Ik heb al wat aangepast.

Je kunt ook de vorm van het dak toevoegen en het aantal verdiepingen. Dan krijg je straks een 3d beeld.
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=52.0479054&lon=5.6223937&zoom=18

commented 2025-10-26 17:11:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173803996
(Comments: 1)
SomeoneElse
(Discussed changesets: 452)
This is a Potlatch revisit of the iD editing done in 173756742 through 173759875. Everything in here was either not possible to do in iD or wasn't done because the track display in iD wasn't clear enough.
commented 2025-10-26 17:08:16 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485
164648986
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 16:58:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173787905
(Comments: 17)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Maak er maar gewoon dat park van.
No problem.
Je kunt trouwens in OSM ook een opmerking oo de kaart zetten.. en we hebben nog het forum als vraagbaak.

commented 2025-10-26 16:45:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173795929
(Comments: 2)
NikoStruiksma
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Top, bedankt.
commented 2025-10-26 16:39:11 UTC by NikoStruiksma ♦1
173802365
(Comments: 2)
Lusent
(Discussed changesets: 1)
There is also a new black mailbox for this address on the road at GPS approx. 36.852957453323015
-81.74456238258507
commented 2025-10-26 16:24:38 UTC by Lusent ♦1
173355976
(Comments: 1)
DazzaG24
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Nice! Thank you for your local knowledge updates. Happy mapping.
commented 2025-10-26 16:19:17 UTC by Firefishy ♦297
173448618
(Comments: 1)
Notume
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Awesome set of updates. Thank you.
commented 2025-10-26 16:18:33 UTC by Firefishy ♦297
159812869
(Comments: 2)
ticho2
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Ahoj, tie tagy tato cesta zdedila z cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76561334, ktora sa povodne tahala od jednej krizovatky az k druhej, ale musel som ju rozdelit kvoli zmene povrchu na jednom useku.

Na zapadnom konci je akurat znacka z...
commented 2025-10-26 16:08:39 UTC by ticho2 ♦22
173800768
(Comments: 1)
Daniil Musatov
(Discussed changesets: 9)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13259774525#map=19/55.752318/37.608390&layers=N тут как будто задвоилось. или это разные объекты?
commented 2025-10-26 16:02:50 UTC by literan ♦6,844
173794178
(Comments: 2)
GewoonStephan
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Ook svp geen adresgegevens op een gebouwomtrek zetten. Er zijn adresnodes.
Ik pas even wat aan.
commented 2025-10-26 16:01:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
41718308
(Comments: 1)
GewoonStephan
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Na jaren weer een edit , maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
<...
commented 2025-10-26 15:57:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173796398
(Comments: 1)
qoro
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hello! Thanks for updating canal names.

Could you please replace English name in the name tag with Georgian one? Englosh name should be kept in the name:en tag.

Also, it would be great if you check all parts of Tsia Canal to the South f...
commented 2025-10-26 15:53:18 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦200
173796607
(Comments: 1)
Zomerzicht
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Hoi,

Je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173796607

Waarschijnlijk bedoel je destination ipv designated. Dan gaat het juist routeren voor motorvoertuigen. Ik pas even wat aan en verwijder access=private, want motor_ve...
commented 2025-10-26 15:50:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
168353198
(Comments: 4)
Dee Kaart
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Oh. May I suggest two things, to help everyone?
1/ It would help enormously to say that you had made the correction in your initial comment. In this case, I spent a while hunting for a mistake which no longer exists. ("joined" platforms...
commented 2025-10-26 15:49:37 UTC by Dee Kaart ♦3
173796236
(Comments: 1)
NikoStruiksma
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Lijkt me oke nu met disused tagging
commented 2025-10-26 15:45:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173795027
(Comments: 2)
limamoka
(Discussed changesets: 2)
reverted by changeset #173800105
Ik heb je wijziging moeten terugdraaien. Het klopt gewoon niet. Er zijn hier geen fietspaden.

Zie ook de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggiecommented 2025-10-26 15:32:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173793684
(Comments: 1)
limamoka
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Kennelijk delen meer bedrijven hetzelfde adres. Dat zou kunnen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-26 15:24:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173723254
(Comments: 1)
spiregrain
(Discussed changesets: 48)
Thanks!
commented 2025-10-26 15:13:21 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645
173793257
(Comments: 1)
Vivian76
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-26 15:11:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173798620
(Comments: 2)
00Abdo youssef
(Discussed changesets: 1)
استناداً إلى تحريراتك على الخريطة في هذا المجموعة من التغييرات، قمت بتصميم اقتراح لما قد يبدو عليه تعليق: "أضفت رقم المنزل و تفاصيل الا...
commented 2025-10-26 15:07:09 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
170039070
(Comments: 2)
shorelessriver25
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Oui, je viens de passer devant, ça existe toujours. C'est dimanche donc c'est fermé mais c'est clairement actif.
commented 2025-10-26 15:06:52 UTC by shorelessriver25 ♦1
173783935
(Comments: 3)
Daniel-Krumbach
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Danke
commented 2025-10-26 14:53:42 UTC by looniverse ♦9
173782394
(Comments: 2)
lukbas
(Discussed changesets: 22)
Cześć
Wcześniej obiekt był oznaczony jako budynek ogólny i był poprawiony na szkolny. Już poprawiono na sala sportowa.
Dzięki za zauważenie . Pozdrawiam
commented 2025-10-26 14:52:40 UTC by lukbas ♦19
168938593
(Comments: 1)
WieKo68
(Discussed changesets: 418)
Z tego co pamiętam, na discordzie umówiliśmy się na niedodawanie boundary=religious_administration do lini wchodzących w skład relacji.
commented 2025-10-26 14:50:08 UTC by SpinOff ♦323
173724435
(Comments: 1)
Camilo Nuñez Castro
(Discussed changesets: 24)
Hola Camilo. Veo que hace tiempo no revisas el telegram.

Al SII hay que tenerle paciencia a veces. Si bien te creo que aparece la palabra "presidente" por ahí, es un nombre alternativo quizas. porque los carteles en terreno es...
commented 2025-10-26 14:40:19 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173786744
(Comments: 1)
GKremp
(Discussed changesets: 8)
bridge:name ist nur nötig, wenn die Brücke nicht als Umriss bzw. als Relation hinzugefügt ist und die Daten dadurch ersichtlich sind, alles andere ist ein Doppeleintrag, welches das Bearbeiten (z.B. Namenswechsel) unnötig erschwer...
commented 2025-10-26 14:21:39 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦232
173738604
(Comments: 4)
Joseph R P
(Discussed changesets: 195)
OSM doesn't exactly have a threshold for how much population a place needs to be classified as a city. Wyoming has no cities that come close to passing 100k in population, but has 10 places tagged as cities in OSM. Colorado itself has a notable ...
commented 2025-10-26 14:11:29 UTC by Joseph R P ♦378
173677638
(Comments: 1)
dathoschy
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Hallo,
bitte prüfe die "socket" tags. "ccs" ist kein gültiger Steckertyp.
commented 2025-10-26 14:08:02 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
173795940
(Comments: 4)
Kancelaria 3DC – Przemysław Ochal Doradca Restrukturyzacyjny Syndyk Upadłość Konsumencka
(Discussed changesets: 1)
ok

commented 2025-10-26 14:07:13 UTC by Kancelaria 3DC – Przemysław Ochal Doradca Restrukturyzacyjny Syndyk Upadłość Konsumencka ♦1
173617074
(Comments: 2)
surveyor54
(Discussed changesets: 138)
Hi, du hast Post.🙋
commented 2025-10-26 13:59:44 UTC by surveyor54 ♦659
173762254
(Comments: 6)
Zomerzicht
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Oke.. Nu komt iemand aan zuidkant uit dat bos wandelen en komt uit op die landbouwweg. Dat routeert dan niet meer met access=private. Dan dus toevoegen foot=permissive.
Dan routeert het weer over de Eigen Weg
Verder voor motorvoertuigen zal het...
commented 2025-10-26 13:46:43 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173794282
(Comments: 1)
stefciostefcio
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna....
commented 2025-10-26 13:30:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173752617
(Comments: 3)
azrael_83
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Aber bei beiden gilt: Vertrauen ist gut - Kontrolle ist besser ;-) Vor Ort oder aktuelles DOP ist meist die aktuellste Quelle. MG ALKIS hat meist die aktuelleren Hausnummern ..
commented 2025-10-26 13:27:16 UTC by tux67 ♦1,982
172618754
(Comments: 2)
katpatuka
(Discussed changesets: 121)
See also discussion under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173743165
commented 2025-10-26 13:24:26 UTC by katpatuka ♦200
173793400
(Comments: 1)
stefciostefcio
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna....
commented 2025-10-26 13:11:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173783698
(Comments: 2)
azrael_83
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hallo, alles klar, danke dir!
commented 2025-10-26 13:10:35 UTC by azrael_83 ♦3
138366563
(Comments: 3)
DomenicoCacace
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Capito grazie, ho corretto quel che ho potuto. Buon mapping a te!
commented 2025-10-26 13:09:15 UTC by baprischka ♦30
172634325
(Comments: 5)
Päscl🛞🐱🛞💨
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hallo Päscl🛞🐱🛞💨,

die von dir genannte Quelle ist leider keine zulässige Quelle, da uns DB InfraGO keine Erlaubnis zur Nutzung erteilt hat und die Inhalte unter das Datenbankschutzrecht fallen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.o...
commented 2025-10-26 12:54:25 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,161
92999265
(Comments: 2)
DaCor
(Discussed changesets: 19)
I no longer engage in discussions on OSM. If you wish to make an edit, make it. Don't message me. Nothing personal, I just don't bother discussing map stuff anymore and just do my own thing. Thanks
commented 2025-10-26 12:52:22 UTC by DaCor ♦56
173789655
(Comments: 2)
Huib van N
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Dankjewel! Leuk om te kunnen bijdragen aan een nuttig project waar ik al regelmatig gebruikte. Ik zal de tips bekijken.

Groet,
Huib
commented 2025-10-26 12:51:14 UTC by Huib van N ♦1
173768002
(Comments: 2)
02826029060144502929130510688601237
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Wilhelmshof - Saal (anmietbar)
Tel.: +493589177910
commented 2025-10-26 12:50:58 UTC by 02826029060144502929130510688601237 ♦3
173766887
(Comments: 2)
02826029060144502929130510688601237
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Dann werde ich NACH meinem Urlaub die Breite ausmessen, OK.
commented 2025-10-26 12:48:45 UTC by 02826029060144502929130510688601237 ♦3
148559922
(Comments: 2)
airwolfke
(Discussed changesets: 1)
hi thanks for you feedback, feel free to change it, I probably have added the during summer. I'm in the region next week and If I have the change I'll bring a visit.
commented 2025-10-26 12:47:46 UTC by airwolfke ♦1
173792870
(Comments: 2)
zhanserik001
(Discussed changesets: 1)
На основе твоих правок карты в этом наборе изменений, я составил предложение для того, как мог бы выглядеть комментарий: "Добавлены до...
commented 2025-10-26 12:46:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173750393
(Comments: 2)
bergfrei
(Discussed changesets: 49)
Hallo user 5359,

Danke für Info,
Fehler korrigiert,
"name=Zillenbachweg"

Gruß bergfrei
commented 2025-10-26 12:46:38 UTC by bergfrei ♦46
173493224
(Comments: 1)
Mr Matt K
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Note on adding track/access roads on private farmland - please make sure to mark the access as "private" as these are not publicly accessible paths (off South Branch Rd near Norz Hill Farm) - thanks.
commented 2025-10-26 12:43:08 UTC by vngx32 ♦2
173765025
(Comments: 2)
02826029060144502929130510688601237
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Wenn es um die Hausnummern 30 - 24 geht, ist meine Löschung völlig korrekt, der Gebäudekomplex (Barracke) wird ABGERISSEN. Wenn man wie ich live vor Ort ist, sieht man, dass nicht mehr viel übrig ist.
commented 2025-10-26 12:42:06 UTC by 02826029060144502929130510688601237 ♦3
172849169
(Comments: 3)
Adze1
(Discussed changesets: 9)
I've double checked and there is also an InPost locker, remapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173792812
commented 2025-10-26 12:39:24 UTC by lakedistrict ♦312
173406470
(Comments: 1)
ma-rt-in
(Discussed changesets: 261)
What are these changes for?
Especially around the new parking space area I do not understand why they were made. This changeset reverts to a state that does not take recent restructuring into account.
commented 2025-10-26 12:30:54 UTC by simgood ♦3
173790408
(Comments: 4)
Zomerzicht
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Er is juridisch verschil tussen Eigen Weg en wegen met Verboden toegang.
Op een Eigen Weg mag je gewoon wandelen of fietsen. De eigenaar is wel gerechtigd je de toegang te allen tijde te ontzeggen. Het is dus niet Verboden Toegang.
We taggen d...
commented 2025-10-26 12:28:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173790027
(Comments: 3)
Zomerzicht
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Maar beste Zomerzicht. Nu je de weg hebt verwijderd zullen fietsers toch nog steeds naar binnen fietsen. Dat doen ze toch niet op grond van een kaart waar je ziet dat het gewoon een oprit is.
Aan de kaart wordt nog steeds gewerkt.
Mapowr zullen...
commented 2025-10-26 12:22:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173786423
(Comments: 1)
santi8ago8
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Google Earth is copyrighted so we must not use it's images to map to OSM. The road is on the imagery available to OSM so I've mapped the road to the line on Bing imagery.

Regards Bernard.
commented 2025-10-26 12:20:14 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948
164736884
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 12:13:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173791877
(Comments: 1)
eggie
(Discussed changesets: 356)
commentaar moet zijn: nodes verwijderd

commented 2025-10-26 12:13:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173775409
(Comments: 1)
Kovács Ervin
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Szia!

Erre inkább a disused: prefix illik. Ha az épület áll, de az üzlet üres benne, akkor a shop=supermarket-et csak javítsd át disused:shop=supermarket-re: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki...
commented 2025-10-26 12:10:33 UTC by infeeeee ♦596
134866928
(Comments: 1)
kasztelan111
(Discussed changesets: 108)
Cześć, skąd pochodzi nazwa "Targowa"?
commented 2025-10-26 12:04:19 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
173781453
(Comments: 2)
rusjanis
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Skaidrs Paldies 👍😊
Par CSN atļauts braukt sabiedriskajam īsti nezinu.
Labi, likšu tava piemēra detalizētās vērtības.
commented 2025-10-26 12:02:10 UTC by rusjanis ♦8
173592673
(Comments: 8)
rap12
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please open the response, the firm is true because i use is
commented 2025-10-26 12:01:55 UTC by rap12 ♦1
173791145
(Comments: 1)
Dawid2849
(Discussed changesets: 182)
urwało początek - niewiele zostało z tej...
commented 2025-10-26 11:54:01 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
173741741
(Comments: 4)
Dimitar155
(Discussed changesets: 117)
Due to local garbage collation issues, it is important to know how may recycling containers of each colour there are.

recycling:glass_bottles:count could work for the green containers, but not for the yellow (plastic packaging + cans).

...
commented 2025-10-26 11:51:18 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦727
173790123
(Comments: 1)
KarolJarosz
(Discussed changesets: 3)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-26 11:41:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173790144
(Comments: 1)
KarolJarosz
(Discussed changesets: 3)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-26 11:41:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173790445
(Comments: 1)
KarolJarosz
(Discussed changesets: 3)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-26 11:41:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
170678148
(Comments: 2)
phlow666
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi,
das passt. Wichtig ist nur, dass Rad fahren da raus genommen wird.
Grüße
commented 2025-10-26 11:33:50 UTC by phlow666 ♦1
173783474
(Comments: 1)
Jejko02
(Discussed changesets: 61)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-26 11:32:15 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173786708
(Comments: 2)
Anonymous36863
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Ето по този блок - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26667813/ - не сте правил промени. Има 14 етажа и https://osmbuildings.org/ приема, че е с височина 42 м.
commented 2025-10-26 11:27:44 UTC by Fraxi ♦169
173789835
(Comments: 2)
Mohsen Khademi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Computer hardware and networking store"
commented 2025-10-26 11:27:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173785045
(Comments: 1)
rademalis
(Discussed changesets: 66)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-26 11:27:11 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173789657
(Comments: 2)
Peppepaolo
(Discussed changesets: 1)
In base alle tue modifiche alla mappa in questo set di modifiche, ho elaborato una proposta per come potrebbe apparire un commento: "Aggiunta area di prateria"
(Auto-translation)
---
Based on your map edits in this changeset, I&rsq...
commented 2025-10-26 11:27:10 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173789256
(Comments: 1)
Herman van Rink
(Discussed changesets: 2)
review_requested \tyes

Hoi Lijkt me oke zo.
Groet
eggie
commented 2025-10-26 11:16:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173787937
(Comments: 1)
DaniCatGames
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community



commented 2025-10-26 11:13:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
172893875
(Comments: 5)
WindOfHope
(Discussed changesets: 1)
понял буду пробовать.Благодарю
commented 2025-10-26 11:11:03 UTC by WindOfHope ♦1
X173787079
(Comments: 1)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Hier is het toch fout gedaan. Ik heb het weer hersteld, wamt ik dacht dat het een fout van mij was.
Wat je insluit zijn de inners en de buitenste polygoon is de outer.
Bij elkaar heet dat dan een multipolygoonrelatie.

Het is inderdaad i...
commented 2025-10-26 11:10:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173782938
(Comments: 5)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Voor mij kennelijk ook niet. Ik heb die vijver en dat bloembed nog even gecorrigeerd naar inner.
commented 2025-10-26 11:05:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173771241
(Comments: 3)
c-the-world
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Already fixed, thank you. Also added "description" from their poster next to the residential entrance. And again, thanks for helping us out with the POIs, it is really appreciated!
commented 2025-10-26 11:02:24 UTC by brdrsrsu ♦9
173760966
(Comments: 2)
sky-is-here
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Also, better to keep only description:en if you can't provide descrption in Georgian.
commented 2025-10-26 11:01:39 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦200
173664204
(Comments: 2)
Gino-52
(Discussed changesets: 27)
Hallo user_5359,
danke für den Hinweis.
War einfach ein Fehler.
Sollte
traffic_sign=DE:240 sein.
Gruß
Gino
commented 2025-10-26 10:52:52 UTC by Gino-52 ♦74
173774303
(Comments: 2)
VictorIE
(Discussed changesets: 136)
Hi,

Thanks for that. :)

The hazards of too much mapping in one day. :(
commented 2025-10-26 10:43:55 UTC by VictorIE ♦952
173787811
(Comments: 1)
wilczywilk
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"św. Rafała Kalinowskiego":
https://www.open...
commented 2025-10-26 10:40:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173572874
(Comments: 3)
LidaCity
(Discussed changesets: 21)
Хочу о том же попросить) не удаляй пожалуйста теги у магазинов с disused:shop=convenience. Я в любом случае, даже если магазин уже закрыт оставляю тег...
commented 2025-10-26 10:38:36 UTC by Vodevil_Mark ♦13
173658612
(Comments: 1)
bandello
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi,
"terrace" might not be the right tag in OSM. "terrace" refers to a place to sit at in the front of a building.
"terraced" is building style.

Maybe you can check for a better tag - I can't come up wi...
commented 2025-10-26 10:37:29 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
173691611
(Comments: 1)
Zybi6
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Hej. Dodałeś tunel ale nałożyłeś go na istniejącą linię strumienia. W takich przypadkach trzeba przeciąć istniejącą linię i jej fragment oznaczyć jako tunel, tak aby linie się na siebie nie nakładały. Jakby co poprawiłem już ten t...
commented 2025-10-26 10:37:11 UTC by SpinOff ♦323
173606857
(Comments: 1)
cnvery
(Discussed changesets: 37)
为什么要在中国的土地上加英文?
commented 2025-10-26 10:37:00 UTC by Taksine ♦119
173664726
(Comments: 1)
oecher2012
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Willkommen zurück bei OSM! Kleiner Hinweis: Bei kopieren aus dem Wiki bitte darauf achten, dass der Prefix Key: (bzw. Tag:) entfernt wird. Danke für Deine Ergänzung.
commented 2025-10-26 10:25:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173764128
(Comments: 3)
Adam_Piszczek
(Discussed changesets: 197)
Na asfalcie są rowery wymalowane to znaku nie będzie.
commented 2025-10-26 10:21:33 UTC by Adam_Piszczek ♦178
173575018
(Comments: 3)
شرکت فرتاک الکتریک آسیا
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173787199
commented 2025-10-26 10:19:58 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173577323
(Comments: 4)
jrstubbs
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173580026
commented 2025-10-26 10:19:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173646123
(Comments: 1)
Ruben Van de Velde
(Discussed changesets: 30)
Hi,
what's wrong with this relation, apart from not being complete? It might be better to have it in a usable state instead of prefixing every key with an undocumented "incomplete".
commented 2025-10-26 10:18:16 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
173593947
(Comments: 3)
mybelcar
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173787097
commented 2025-10-26 10:17:39 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
155984391
(Comments: 2)
Rogoyski
(Discussed changesets: 63)
Dzięki. Złapałem się już parę razy na takich przypadkach i staram się pilnować, zwłaszcza przy gastronomii, która często ma takie dodatkowe tagi, których EveryDoor nie kasuje. Ale pewnie wciąż się zdarza, że nie ...
commented 2025-10-26 10:17:16 UTC by Rogoyski ♦231
173612007
(Comments: 3)
Best Horizons
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173615529
commented 2025-10-26 10:16:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173612465
(Comments: 3)
Trusted Heating & Air Conditioning
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637880
commented 2025-10-26 10:15:36 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173621915
(Comments: 3)
Jersey Behavioral Health
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637387
commented 2025-10-26 10:15:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173786133
(Comments: 7)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Nee... editor iD is beperkt. Die editor vindt het al snel goed.
Ik kijk met josm.
Die geeft zelfs een waarschuwing bij upload.
commented 2025-10-26 10:15:05 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173622667
(Comments: 4)
kinggatesbuilders
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637254
commented 2025-10-26 10:14:48 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173623076
(Comments: 3)
HDAO Group
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786950
commented 2025-10-26 10:14:06 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173628487
(Comments: 3)
Door Pros
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173636875
commented 2025-10-26 10:13:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173641021
(Comments: 4)
cubski
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173641551
commented 2025-10-26 10:12:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173654141
(Comments: 4)
davewarrencdjr
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173657427
commented 2025-10-26 10:11:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173659284
(Comments: 3)
Thomas Hodgkiss
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173681642
commented 2025-10-26 10:10:56 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173661333
(Comments: 5)
latis education
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173661960
commented 2025-10-26 10:10:21 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173668575
(Comments: 3)
Southern VIP & Foot Rescue Surgery Center Fulton KY
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173680482
commented 2025-10-26 10:09:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173671349
(Comments: 3)
Valence coatings
(Discussed changesets: 2)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173786696
where the changeset comment is:
Remove unclear map edits
commented 2025-10-26 10:08:39 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173672944
(Comments: 3)
Dr Thomas Hodgkiss
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786659
commented 2025-10-26 10:07:56 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173717590
(Comments: 1)
Rapsak1
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/4787423. I correct your typo sodwqlk:both:smoothness to sidewalk:both:smoothness. But the real question is why is sidewalk:both used at all for sidewalk=left?
commented 2025-10-26 10:07:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173703648
(Comments: 3)
Desaihealth
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173717592
commented 2025-10-26 10:06:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173705767
(Comments: 4)
Mistrz Wizytówki - Pozycjonowanie Wizytówki Google
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173705985
commented 2025-10-26 10:05:41 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173708768
(Comments: 4)
Vicente Camarasa Cerrajeros
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173723457
commented 2025-10-26 10:04:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173742093
(Comments: 3)
Jerrit Burgess
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786465
commented 2025-10-26 10:03:57 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173636854
(Comments: 1)
drebelo40
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi,
could you describe what is / what is not allowed at this point? The tags are unfortunately not correct.
commented 2025-10-26 10:03:56 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
167974619
(Comments: 2)
shagazan
(Discussed changesets: 2)
voir note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5022440
commented 2025-10-26 10:03:42 UTC by Patchanka ♦409
173742371
(Comments: 3)
OnPoint Solar Panel Cleaning Encinitas
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173743111
commented 2025-10-26 10:03:29 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173743357
(Comments: 4)
Shane Adam Thompson
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173764259
commented 2025-10-26 10:02:53 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173754929
(Comments: 3)
Heliodore Houenou
(Discussed changesets: 1)
✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173768882
commented 2025-10-26 10:00:52 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173774132
(Comments: 3)
lure357
(Discussed changesets: 1)
👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173774382
commented 2025-10-26 10:00:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328
173769166
(Comments: 1)
Goldschmiede Hinrichsmeyer
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo Goldschmiede Hinrichsmeyer,

willkommen bei OSM und danke für's Update.

Gruß
tux67
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173769166

commented 2025-10-26 09:58:39 UTC by tux67 ♦1,982
173766788
(Comments: 2)
syntex
(Discussed changesets: 283)
Moze być i forest, generalnie była biała plama więc na szybko wziąłem scrub. Ale można zmienić
commented 2025-10-26 09:58:01 UTC by syntex ♦886
164815331
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 09:56:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
164866765
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 09:52:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173784846
(Comments: 1)
Rössler
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Gehe davon aus, daß St 2177 bis zur endgueltigen Fertigstellung weiter durch den Ort verlaeuft. Es fehlen: Regenrueckhaltebecken Richtung Kreuzweiher, neue landwirtschaftliche Wege und deren Zufahrten, ...
commented 2025-10-26 09:50:22 UTC by Rössler ♦3
159318394
(Comments: 2)
Voonosm
(Discussed changesets: 32)
Ich glaub, das war aus einem Wanderbeschrieb. Jemand der "alte Wege" lief, aber frag mich nicht mehr woher ich das hatte. Evtl hab ich vergessen, das Ding auf abandoned:highway zu setzen.
commented 2025-10-26 09:46:15 UTC by Voonosm ♦12
173686070
(Comments: 7)
azrael_83
(Discussed changesets: 3)
p.s: da ich hier im weiteren Umfeld auch QS mache, könnte noch der ein oder andere Hinweis von mir kommen .. wenn das ok ist.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Qualit%C3%A4tssicherung

commented 2025-10-26 09:45:54 UTC by tux67 ♦1,982
164907153
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 09:39:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
130147218
(Comments: 2)
guerda
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Hallo mueschel,
danke für den Hinweis, werde ich korrigieren.

commented 2025-10-26 09:37:01 UTC by guerda ♦20
173772069
(Comments: 1)
noam15A
(Discussed changesets: 2)
העדכון לגן נראה טוב! זכור לי במעומעם שיש עמדת תיקון אופניים בפארק הזה. אתה יכול לאמת? אם כן אפשר להוסיף נקודה חדשה מסוג "Bicycle Repair Tool Stand"...
commented 2025-10-26 09:33:05 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦656
173743165
(Comments: 3)
katpatuka
(Discussed changesets: 121)
In cases where a place=* represents an administrative village (行政村) division rather than a physical settlement, the character '村' should be retained in the name, though whether to retain such place=* feature remains a matter of deba...
commented 2025-10-26 09:24:09 UTC by Lepuse ♦30
164924030
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 09:23:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173752043
(Comments: 3)
theophrastos
(Discussed changesets: 45)
Guten Morgen Klaus,

danke für deine Erläuterungen. Offenbar bist du bis jetzt der Einzige, der diesen Schlüssel anwendet. Ich habe weltweit danach gesucht. Nur rund 500 Treffer in Deutschland gefunden, die auch wohl alle von dir...
commented 2025-10-26 09:23:28 UTC by george1201 ♦237
164924209
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 09:23:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
164944494
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 09:19:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
164950629
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 09:19:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
164995896
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 09:18:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172050009
(Comments: 7)
sahealy30
(Discussed changesets: 7)
@sahealy30, bitte nicht auf der Grundlage von Ankündigungen, Verdacht und veralteten Luftbilder mappen.

Vor-Ort-Kenntniss ist angesagt.

Gruß. ALu68
commented 2025-10-26 09:17:33 UTC by ALu68 ♦361
173765579
(Comments: 1)
syntex
(Discussed changesets: 283)
Na poligon da się wejść z racji na brak ostrzeżenia od wschodniej strony, więc utwardzone drogi faktycznie lepiej wyglądają z ustawionym ograniczeniem dostępu.
commented 2025-10-26 09:09:22 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267
173682622
(Comments: 13)
vanagaudi
(Discussed changesets: 27)
Ich lade dich nach https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zuviel-des-guten-bei-der-multipolygon-nutzung/ ein. Dort wird aktuell auch über die Verwendung von MPen diskutiert.
commented 2025-10-26 09:04:37 UTC by aixbrick ♦868
164997721
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:58:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173759349
(Comments: 1)
dypa
(Discussed changesets: 16)
Добрый день! Спасибо, буду внимательнее
commented 2025-10-26 08:56:30 UTC by Ozon OSM16 ♦3
173773028
(Comments: 1)
wermak
(Discussed changesets: 175)
Moin :)

kleiner Hinweis vielleicht:
Du hast hier min. 1 administrative boundary mit physischen Objekten verbunden. Vielleicht blendest du Grenzen beim Bearbeiten ganz aus, dann passiert das nicht.

happy mapping
---commented 2025-10-26 08:56:00 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
172512514
(Comments: 3)
aharvey
(Discussed changesets: 89)
Thanks for fixing it, sorry from the outside it looked like apartments but I didn't check any signs or entrances.
commented 2025-10-26 08:49:27 UTC by aharvey ♦1,842
165041443
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:48:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165120944
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:48:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165032366
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:48:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165140757
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:47:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165267572
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:47:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165474292
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:46:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165493096
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:46:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173671933
(Comments: 3)
Marc Mongenet
(Discussed changesets: 21)
OK, si c'est "officiellement" pastorale on peut la laisser en track ; d'autant plus si ça correspond aux pratiques locales.
Je ne suis pas un local de l'étape donc je ne vais pas y toucher.
Le mieux serait...
commented 2025-10-26 08:44:14 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦41
173783187
(Comments: 1)
Vinterling
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. .. format phone aangepast naar +31
MVG,
Eggie
Name...
commented 2025-10-26 08:37:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
171359188
(Comments: 1)
Adam-Eye
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi Adam-Eye, could I ask what made you think Wickes in Taunton had closed?
commented 2025-10-26 08:33:12 UTC by UKChris ♦44
165517713
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:33:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165532288
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:33:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165534518
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:33:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173310080
(Comments: 2)
lawrencebanks
(Discussed changesets: 27)
DNVTM is a trunk road only from DN59 to DN6-A1 in the absence of any express road or motorway (the future A9) - as Romania has express roads now and motorways usually take the trunk traffic from the national roads (see DN69 Timisoara-Arad, DN7 Arad-D...
commented 2025-10-26 08:31:47 UTC by lawrencebanks ♦18
171919406
(Comments: 3)
Robert Whittaker
(Discussed changesets: 129)
Thanks Robert, I see now what you mean, a previous edit marked Wickes as disused, which was inaccurate.
commented 2025-10-26 08:31:21 UTC by UKChris ♦44
173706307
(Comments: 4)
BakedCake02
(Discussed changesets: 4)
corr....All these comments are in relation to the Moree Met Office area.

commented 2025-10-26 08:30:13 UTC by nevw ♦2,063
173782932
(Comments: 1)
Mateusz Konieczny
(Discussed changesets: 551)
dalsze naprawy w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173783031
commented 2025-10-26 08:21:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165637706
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:16:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165845737
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:13:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173777632
(Comments: 1)
Loweball
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please check that the entry is correct. The aerial photograph shows a damaged building with poor transport links.
commented 2025-10-26 08:09:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173782616
(Comments: 1)
Mateusz Konieczny
(Discussed changesets: 551)
próby dalszej poprawy w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173782716
commented 2025-10-26 08:08:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166334451
(Comments: 1)
ompatekar
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Last time I was here I didn't remember seeing any sign indicating a turn restriction (will look again when I next visit) . What source was used for this edit ?
commented 2025-10-26 08:08:23 UTC by TheLNL ♦10
173769603
(Comments: 1)
NC Locksmith Experts
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.

commented 2025-10-26 08:05:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
166155176
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:04:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166118402
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:04:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166118608
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:04:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166027495
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:04:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165998116
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:04:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
165997471
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:04:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166160526
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 08:03:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166161158
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:59:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166161743
(Comments: 3)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:59:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166189133
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:58:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166258649
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:57:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166269616
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:57:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173670711
(Comments: 3)
wbecker123
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Ah, OK: Jetzt seh ich es auch auf der Karte von der Stadt. ;-) Hätte ich genauer hinschauen sollen.
Danke für´s Korrigieren.
commented 2025-10-26 07:55:04 UTC by disc24 ♦31
166537660
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:52:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173781031
(Comments: 1)
aerth
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Dag earth
Bedenk dat bezorgdiensten hier ook niet meer routeren.
Je zou ook permissive kunnen gebruiken ipv private Dan routeert het wel.
Welke bebording staat vooraan de straat?
MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-26 07:51:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173780916
(Comments: 1)
aerth
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Ik heb wat aangepast hier. Het is geen residentialroad. Het parkeerterrein op private gezet.
MVG,
Eggie
Nam...
commented 2025-10-26 07:47:46 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
166581844
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:45:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166618162
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:45:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
166652653
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:42:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173780082
(Comments: 1)
camman29
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11646934645 (a tree) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!

Please have also a look on
https://w...
commented 2025-10-26 07:42:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173752744
(Comments: 2)
CaptainCarte
(Discussed changesets: 38)
das kann ich ändern
commented 2025-10-26 07:29:35 UTC by CaptainCarte ♦17
166836155
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:28:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
168175333
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-26 07:28:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173765897
(Comments: 4)
A67-A67
(Discussed changesets: 342)
Als ik naar de indruk van hun website kijk, krijg ik de indruk dat al hun winkels shop=cheese zijn, of shop=deli als de kaas meer in balans is met de worst en nootjes. (In Leeuwarden zitten worst en kaas dan toevallig gescheiden.)

> Een moo...
commented 2025-10-26 07:24:14 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦681
173642077
(Comments: 2)
Atmayoni das
(Discussed changesets: 5)
спасибо. теперь буду знать.
тоже что-то такое думал. Это ИИ подсказал так сделать.
commented 2025-10-26 06:15:43 UTC by Atmayoni das ♦5
173711154
(Comments: 1)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Bitte nicht die Gebäudeumrisse verschieben beim Verbinden mit Wegen oder Flächen.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173711154#21/51.51464/7.32064

Straßenflächen, wenn du sie so einträgst, sollten...
commented 2025-10-26 06:02:09 UTC by Bienson ♦351
173709923
(Comments: 1)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Kein parking=lane.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking=lane

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
commented 2025-10-26 05:56:44 UTC by Bienson ♦351
173669509
(Comments: 3)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654
(Discussed changesets: 15)
demolished:building=yes
commented 2025-10-26 05:46:54 UTC by Bienson ♦351
173699748
(Comments: 3)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Wege übereinander zu legen ist keine Lösung.
Weg aufsplitten oder vom Verbindungspunkt trennen und verkürzen.
Bitte die "Hilfe"-Sektion im iD-Editor durchlesen.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset...
commented 2025-10-26 05:44:07 UTC by Bienson ♦351
173727701
(Comments: 1)
SD Mapman
(Discussed changesets: 30)
Great job, looks like we’re almost done with all the townships East River!
commented 2025-10-26 05:35:24 UTC by Molandfreak ♦13
X173750946
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
please keep changesets to one continent
commented 2025-10-26 03:30:07 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
X173751070
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
please keep changesets to one continent
commented 2025-10-26 03:29:56 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
X173751071
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
please keep changesets to one continent
commented 2025-10-26 03:29:42 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
X173751069
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
please keep changesets to one continent
commented 2025-10-26 03:29:07 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
X173751127
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
please keep changesets to one continent
commented 2025-10-26 03:28:42 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
X173751129
(Comments: 1)
LeMa😃
(Discussed changesets: 12)
please keep changesets to one continent or area
commented 2025-10-26 03:28:24 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
162002452
(Comments: 2)
Donnut
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I did not intend to address the last comment to you.
commented 2025-10-26 02:30:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
43424535
(Comments: 1)
osm_saint-louis
(Discussed changesets: 56)
Hello,

Why did you tag the highways in this area the way you did? e.g. in way 402672543 you changed your own tagging between versions 6 & 10.
commented 2025-10-26 02:29:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
173563170
(Comments: 4)
AgusQui
(Discussed changesets: 197)
Hola Agus, buenas noches. En efecto, no fue como en el caso de Moreno, igual entiendo que lo hayas pensado de esa manera. Quilmes Este se lo nombra como "Quilmes", lo mismo pasa con Bernal y Ezpeleta. Banco poner el alt_name.

Y graci...
commented 2025-10-26 01:35:54 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦18
173771045
(Comments: 1)
fudoreaper
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Did you notice that the esri images got updated for winnipeg? Thought you might be interested to know!
commented 2025-10-26 01:32:26 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦41
173776604
(Comments: 1)
S-zation
(Discussed changesets: 32)
reverted by c/s 173777252 after additional research
commented 2025-10-26 01:22:03 UTC by S-zation ♦117
65826787
(Comments: 1)
CartONG_Imports
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello,

I would be very thankful to have water in the destert, but this looks like a potential typo. Are these water tanks really named thank {number}?
commented 2025-10-26 01:15:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
172367218
(Comments: 1)
johnmogi
(Discussed changesets: 27)
johnmogi,

Conforme consta na Wiki, uma ponte não deve conectar mais de um segmento de estrada em qualquer de suas pontas. Portanto, geometrias como a seguinte, deve prevalecer.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974140885

N...
commented 2025-10-26 01:13:11 UTC by santamariense ♦828
173764732
(Comments: 1)
Lino Mario Cabrera
(Discussed changesets: 10)
hmmm.... el nombre de esta "avenida villarroel" es maría barzola?
commented 2025-10-26 01:00:01 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,600
173655353
(Comments: 1)
CheeseSplatter
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This has been reverted. Do not make massive, sweeping edits like this without consultation with the community or third-party review. Current road designations are based on City and CRD data. This is effectively vandalism and has been reported as such...
commented 2025-10-26 00:50:32 UTC by InfiNorth ♦14
127975689
(Comments: 1)
Dhadams
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Please do not make drastic, sweeping edits like this in a well mapped area without consulting the community. You have outright deleted an entire section of Shelbourne Street, added inappropriate redundant bike lanes, and broken a large number of rela...
commented 2025-10-26 00:37:12 UTC by InfiNorth ♦14
173733446
(Comments: 1)
seakid6
(Discussed changesets: 1)
#TIP: add the address to the house outline. Just select the outline in the editor and fill in the address fields.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173733446

commented 2025-10-26 00:19:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
162031932
(Comments: 5)
Saintry17
(Discussed changesets: 2)
They’ll always show, but the segments through the gates should prevent people from being routed through there.

Heads up, though….there’s a lot of road construction going on in the port.
commented 2025-10-25 23:44:46 UTC by txemt ♦75
173744766
(Comments: 1)
Szymiii
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Podejrzewam, że deweloper zastrzega wszystkie prawa autorskie do tych materiałów. Nawet jeśli tego nie wyraża wprost, to przysługują mu automatycznie. Czy udzielona została licencja do tworzenia utworów zależnych na po...
commented 2025-10-25 22:49:28 UTC by cielak42 ♦28
173766329
(Comments: 1)
Szymiii
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Pytanie w kwestii źródła "dane od dewelopera przekazane podczas wizyty". Czy deweloper udzielił licencji na tworzenie map na podstawie tych danych, oraz na ich opublikowanie? Jeżeli nie, to te zmiany stanowią naruszenie praw aut...
commented 2025-10-25 22:42:04 UTC by cielak42 ♦28
173774251
(Comments: 1)
charl3s
(Discussed changesets: 194)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13256790677

Pozdrawia...
commented 2025-10-25 22:31:27 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173733302
(Comments: 2)
MatveiKaKei
(Discussed changesets: 2)
А ну да, спасибо за поправку!
commented 2025-10-25 22:29:05 UTC by MatveiKaKei ♦2
173733027
(Comments: 4)
MatveiKaKei
(Discussed changesets: 2)
На этот сайт зайти не смог потому что выдает ошибку но я зашёл через другой сайт и название подходит
commented 2025-10-25 22:26:05 UTC by MatveiKaKei ♦2
173749773
(Comments: 1)
cyberatlas
(Discussed changesets: 105)
Może chcesz zagłosować? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pl:Tag:highway=trunk#G%C5%82osowanie_-_2._tura
commented 2025-10-25 22:22:37 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦295
173750964
(Comments: 1)
Elysee1021
(Discussed changesets: 2)
"уточнен тип объекта" но вы же просто убрали название (основное) и тег посадки на улице
commented 2025-10-25 22:02:21 UTC by 4004 ♦1,913
161803589
(Comments: 1)
Mystik8973
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello! Does this Flock camera on Meriden Road in Wolcott still exist? I've checked mapillary.com streetview imagery from March 7, 2025 and did not see anything in front of the Hertz. Thank you!
commented 2025-10-25 22:00:12 UTC by S-zation ♦117
173750515
(Comments: 2)
Elysee1021
(Discussed changesets: 2)
ну и, наверное, какие то помещения сдадут новым арендаторам, или они так и стоят?
commented 2025-10-25 21:59:40 UTC by 4004 ♦1,913
173386365
(Comments: 2)
MayaDancer
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Na pewno :)
commented 2025-10-25 21:50:52 UTC by MayaDancer ♦2
173194397
(Comments: 1)
Mian Hamza Athar
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Dera Mian Hamza Athar
commented 2025-10-25 21:43:58 UTC by Mian Hamza Athar ♦1
173711949
(Comments: 1)
GladGrip
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hi Gladgrip,

Why did you change the brand/wikidata brand of Go Outdoors Express (Q131862654) to Go Outdoors? ( Q75293941). The former matches what the shop is actually called so I don't see why it needed to be changed.

Best Regards...
commented 2025-10-25 21:30:31 UTC by matt_ellery ♦77
173194528
(Comments: 5)
sheldonelectric
(Discussed changesets: 53)
👍
commented 2025-10-25 21:20:22 UTC by dafadllyn ♦70
173768809
(Comments: 1)
JS of A
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-25 20:47:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173624406
(Comments: 1)
StrikeMind
(Discussed changesets: 5)
reverted. please provide a source for major road deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173771486
commented 2025-10-25 20:30:38 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127
173596867
(Comments: 4)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
I have recorded the first part of the real names with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173765139 and CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173770747. However, there is still a lot to do in this area.

Sven
commented 2025-10-25 20:14:21 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,090
173747997
(Comments: 1)
qq-aaa
(Discussed changesets: 5)
你好。在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173419593#c1499622 评论的基础上进行补充,与道路粘连的公交站应使用"public_transport=stop_position"而非"public_transport=platform"。鉴于此编辑是http...
commented 2025-10-25 19:48:13 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦20
173600324
(Comments: 1)
Editor_S
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Deze wijziging is incorrect. ALDI wordt met hoofdletters geschreven, ook in lopende tekst. Daarom heb ik de brand- en name-tags hersteld.

De iD-editor geeft suggesties bij diverse winkelketens, maar let op: dit zijn slechts suggesties en geen ...
commented 2025-10-25 19:38:44 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,018
172439522
(Comments: 4)
vngx32
(Discussed changesets: 1)
I think there's some subjectivity, rather than a hard rule, whether driveway can be used when shared between two adjacent residences. There are plenty of examples in the forums and questions online where the OSM community supports using service/...
commented 2025-10-25 19:32:31 UTC by vngx32 ♦2
173689794
(Comments: 1)
Mabema1
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hola Mabema1, gracias por tus aportaciones a OpenStreetMap.
Si vas a actualizar las líneas de bus, es conveniente que repases las directrices de la wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses
Con esta herramienta puedes encontrar ...
commented 2025-10-25 19:15:37 UTC by MarinoBM ♦112
173503757
(Comments: 1)
pm54
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonsoir,
J'ai vu que vous attaquiez un gros morceau suite à la refonte du réseau de transport sur Vitré/Châteaubourg.
Je jardine depuis des années sur les bus en Bretagne, je peux vous donner un coup de ma...
commented 2025-10-25 19:13:36 UTC by mga_geo ♦267
173766931
(Comments: 1)
wizerbar
(Discussed changesets: 12)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD
commented 2025-10-25 19:07:25 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173197734
(Comments: 1)
ad08r
(Discussed changesets: 4)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-25 19:03:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173766884
(Comments: 1)
ad08r
(Discussed changesets: 4)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-25 19:02:58 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173768484
(Comments: 2)
:-}
(Discussed changesets: 186)
Tego typu komentarz wystarczy
commented 2025-10-25 19:00:23 UTC by :-} ♦192
173140301
(Comments: 1)
:-}
(Discussed changesets: 186)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-25 18:57:40 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173273379
(Comments: 1)
:-}
(Discussed changesets: 186)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
commented 2025-10-25 18:57:21 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
170089893
(Comments: 6)
Tomáš Odehnal
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Tady je středník dokonce jako součást URL.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53022111
Ale to je taková okrajová kuriozita, chápu že se tomu běžně nedá dobrat.
commented 2025-10-25 18:56:13 UTC by martin-kokos ♦38
173761745
(Comments: 1)
Partsguy74
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
commented 2025-10-25 18:53:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173766480
(Comments: 1)
Henk van Rens
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Dag Henk,

De format van de openingstijden klopte niet. Dagen van de week twee letters.
Gebruik anders deze tool.
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-25 18:41:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
172822060
(Comments: 3)
Sébastien Santsch
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Yeah I know, but it is wrong to add not existing features to osm. Only because Openrailwaymap renders them, doesn't mean it's right.
However they recently added support for the openhistoricalmap data. So this should be rendered in it as ...
commented 2025-10-25 18:33:56 UTC by Piagno ♦112
173766391
(Comments: 1)
GerbenTim
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community




commented 2025-10-25 18:32:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173761142
(Comments: 1)
themapper53
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Are you going to add the deleted landuse back? Some of the deleted data was perfectly valid and some was mostly correct, and in my opinion there was no reason to delete it especially if you didn't add it back. If the data is 90% valid or complet...
commented 2025-10-25 18:32:08 UTC by カシオペア ♦3
173763026
(Comments: 1)
KL63ant
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-25 18:31:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
155058863
(Comments: 12)
karlrt
(Discussed changesets: 13)
Thank you, and have a great dinner/weekend yourself!
commented 2025-10-25 18:30:54 UTC by karlrt ♦9
173765374
(Comments: 2)
notmyproblem1
(Discussed changesets: 29)
after a discussion with user
commented 2025-10-25 18:27:00 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110
173766527
(Comments: 1)
Rcordero1
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, welcome to OSM. I just want to apologize that I deleted your baseball diamond. The baseball field was already drawn and that's what we normally map for baseball pitches, and having two on top of each other is kind of confusing. If you wa...
commented 2025-10-25 18:06:35 UTC by gpserror ♦224
173758117
(Comments: 1)
OSM FTW
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Здравейте!
Цялото това нещо-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444706122 - не ми се струва, че е паркинг, съдейки от сателитните снимки към края на май тази г...
commented 2025-10-25 18:01:23 UTC by Fraxi ♦169
157023148
(Comments: 2)
Grzegorz Madrjas
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Ten znak znów się pojawił :/

Przywróciłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173766429
commented 2025-10-25 17:40:48 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158
173766204
(Comments: 2)
02826029060144502929130510688601237
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen in diesem Changeset habe ich einen Vorschlag für einen Kommentar erstellt, der so aussehen könnte: "Hinzu gefügt wurden Adressdetails, einschließlich Stadt, Postleitzahl, Hausnummern u...
commented 2025-10-25 17:37:03 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
172817910
(Comments: 2)
SleepyAks
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Nie. Jest z kostki jak był :) Zmiana cofnięta.
commented 2025-10-25 17:34:03 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,158
173760227
(Comments: 1)
lalluby6782
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Wow, gran trabajo en un lugar donde es complicado de llegar para un mañero común y donde puede ser de mucha utilidad para la gente local. Impresionante la cantidad de muelles que existen allí.
commented 2025-10-25 17:31:35 UTC by mweper ♦427
173451585
(Comments: 1)
Daniele_Granato97
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hola, antes que nada, gracias por añadir información a OSM!
Vi que agregó varios nombres de calles en El Bañado. Para la próxima vez que añada nombres, le recomiendo consultar la política de OSM de ...
commented 2025-10-25 17:30:32 UTC by SPalferro ♦15
173688867
(Comments: 2)
velomalopolska
(Discussed changesets: 4)
najnowszy odcinek z asfaltem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785003510
commented 2025-10-25 17:29:45 UTC by Adam_Piszczek ♦178
160810556
(Comments: 2)
t_ja
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Dik za upozornenie 👍
Tak dlho som cakal na novu Ofmozaiku, az som na toto zabudol 🙈
commented 2025-10-25 17:29:31 UTC by t_ja ♦217
173764774
(Comments: 1)
hne9MS7Q7
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Thanks for adding more information.

Please make sure to always type phone numbers using the international format (+32 2…) and not the local format (02…). ITU-T E.164 format is mandatory on OSM.

We fixed your edit.
commented 2025-10-25 17:15:50 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
173686714
(Comments: 2)
jbcharron
(Discussed changesets: 23)
Je savais qu'il avait du mouvement mais les planned: ne sont pas visible dans STC
J'ai supprimé mon noeud
commented 2025-10-25 17:14:38 UTC by jbcharron ♦123
173762496
(Comments: 4)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/173763062/6829490
commented 2025-10-25 16:58:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
104058563
(Comments: 3)
superfafa74
(Discussed changesets: 1)
fait https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173764918
commented 2025-10-25 16:56:22 UTC by Vinber ♦811
173764006
(Comments: 4)
DeltaBurg
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Opmerking op de kaart geplaatst
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5022698#map=16/52.35404/5.01356&layers=N
commented 2025-10-25 16:43:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173762428
(Comments: 1)
Miezpiez
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-25 16:32:46 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173661221
(Comments: 2)
itsmeorestis
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thank you very much for your comment! I will check out and fix the references you pointed out!
commented 2025-10-25 16:26:53 UTC by itsmeorestis ♦1
173584690
(Comments: 1)
Malema99
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hola.

¿Por qué se ha eliminado la etiqueta de museo?

Un saludo.
commented 2025-10-25 16:17:40 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦356
173678039
(Comments: 5)
vanagaudi
(Discussed changesets: 27)
In diesem Fall ist es OSM2World.
commented 2025-10-25 16:16:22 UTC by vanagaudi ♦30
173269830
(Comments: 3)
SafwatHalaby
(Discussed changesets: 77)
תודה 👋
commented 2025-10-25 16:13:15 UTC by hatul ♦410
173762090
(Comments: 3)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Zo zou die goed moeten staan volgensmij.
commented 2025-10-25 16:03:04 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12
159845419
(Comments: 1)
CécileBC
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Bonjour, je viens d'annuler cette suppression car le bâtiment n'était pas en double, le musée est cartographié séparément du bâtiment.
commented 2025-10-25 16:00:58 UTC by Syl ♦998
173737519
(Comments: 2)
kapazao_import
(Discussed changesets: 34)
Hi, it is explained in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Public_Transport
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:public_transport=platform
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=bus_stop
https://wiki.o...
commented 2025-10-25 15:57:52 UTC by kapazao ♦935
173761433
(Comments: 2)
Adam Haba
(Discussed changesets: 120)
Dziękuję, również pozdrawiam :)

commented 2025-10-25 15:45:57 UTC by Adam Haba ♦27
173748537
(Comments: 1)
XXXXXXXXXXXF
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Moin :)

wo finde ich denn die Lizenzen zur Quelle? Kann auf der Seite nur ein (c) finden und das macht die Seite erstmal nicht für uns nutzbar.

cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https...
commented 2025-10-25 15:44:43 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
173588654
(Comments: 1)
Adrian Slaby
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo Adrian Slaby,
du hast den neuen Kreisverkehr bei Stechow in einen Radweg umgewandelt und damit den Kfz-Verkehr ausgeschlossen. Das sieht mir unplausibel aus, zumal dieser meines Wissens bereits für den Verkehr freigegeben ist und ein Ge...
commented 2025-10-25 15:28:23 UTC by bergaufsee ♦114
173760018
(Comments: 2)
Juan Chamorro
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Basado en tus ediciones de mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he redactado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Ajustada la geometría de 4 nodos"
(Auto-translation)
---
Based on your map ed...
commented 2025-10-25 15:06:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173684785
(Comments: 1)
Walter Łuszczyk
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Zabawy w testowanie proszę uskuteczniać tu: https://opengeofiction.net/ a nie na realnej mapie!
commented 2025-10-25 14:56:12 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173756499
(Comments: 1)
Walter Łuszczyk
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Zabawy w testowanie proszę uskuteczniać tu: https://opengeofiction.net/ a nie na realnej mapie!
commented 2025-10-25 14:55:46 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦581
173729135
(Comments: 1)
Ozon OSM16
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Полигон здания нарисован поверх забора, здание удалено см https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173759349
commented 2025-10-25 14:46:43 UTC by dypa ♦144
173756128
(Comments: 4)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Lichtenvoorde wordt zeker nog wat, mist best veel groen op de map. Ondanks het een heel groen dorp is. Ga beetje bij beetje kijken of ik alles er netjes in kan zetten.
commented 2025-10-25 14:25:46 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12
173704078
(Comments: 2)
Norbert Wołowiec
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Thank you. I forgot to remove the tags that are imported from the BDOT10K database, and the JOSM validator ignores them.
commented 2025-10-25 14:22:37 UTC by Norbert Wołowiec ♦2
173756796
(Comments: 2)
bemy
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2878974498#map=19/52.224544/5.181666
commented 2025-10-25 14:20:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173700839
(Comments: 3)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Even if those claims you make were true, they are not a motive for removing items that actually exist on the ground.

For the last time, I ask you to revert these deletions, including all the other changesets (11 changesets in total) made by yo...
commented 2025-10-25 14:06:24 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22
172908614
(Comments: 1)
DreasNil
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Revertar borttagning av Bar Beckasin. Den ligger fortfarande där.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173757359
commented 2025-10-25 14:01:09 UTC by Nadja15 ♦16
173755183
(Comments: 4)
thpa
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
commented 2025-10-25 13:46:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
165990723
(Comments: 1)
schilling5628
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hallo schilling5628, du hast dir viel Mühe beim Mappen des Einkaufszentrums gemacht. Die einzelnen Räume/Geschäfte sollten besser als einzelne Räume und nicht als eigenständige Gebäude (building=yes) eingezeichnet werden...
commented 2025-10-25 13:36:18 UTC by schoka ♦52
173754301
(Comments: 1)
GATAA RANA
(Discussed changesets: 3)
"GR:national_old" is not the correct network=* tag for an old provincial road relation. It should be "GR:provincial_old:16" instead.
commented 2025-10-25 13:32:27 UTC by ika-chan! ♦296
71461905
(Comments: 1)
yoda75
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo,

siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5019333 bzgl. der von dir gesetzten access-Werte in dieser Gegend
commented 2025-10-25 13:22:04 UTC by Luzandro ♦946
173643891
(Comments: 3)
Adam Edwards
(Discussed changesets: 24)
Thanks!
commented 2025-10-25 13:19:05 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485
165983097
(Comments: 1)
Franco83
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Buen día! Corresponde mantener las palabras sin abreviar en un nombre. Voy a ir corrigiendo. Saludos! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name
commented 2025-10-25 13:09:51 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦126
172592171
(Comments: 5)
X_223-
(Discussed changesets: 5)
不是哥们,你要多长时间啊?三个月?三年?三百年?
commented 2025-10-25 13:04:43 UTC by Taksine ♦119
173746540
(Comments: 1)
ozjustbc
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, we cant use Google Maps as a source for OpenStreetMap as it is prohibited by their terms of service. There's more information on the OSM wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google


commented 2025-10-25 12:36:34 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645
173753734
(Comments: 1)
freeek123455676788644
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community


commented 2025-10-25 12:27:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173753343
(Comments: 1)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Dag Jacob Ziet er wel netjes uit.
Je zou evt de witruimte tussen de vlakken gras kunnen verwijderen door de vlakken samen te voegen.
Het pad langs het water liep eerst kennelijk ook door die witruimte. Denk dat je die vlakken ook wel kan samen...
commented 2025-10-25 12:25:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173610996
(Comments: 1)
BCNorwich
(Discussed changesets: 237)
Alas,
"Remove duplicated section of highway" looks like it introduced a gap in the Chiltern Way. I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173753717 .
Best Regards,
Andy

commented 2025-10-25 12:24:22 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦475
173578889
(Comments: 2)
Taya_S
(Discussed changesets: 57)
Well, I do agree with you. I'm not a fan of proposed features getting mapped. As it stands right now, it is more or less up to each local community to decide whether they want proposed objects or not.

If you've got anything specifica...
commented 2025-10-25 12:22:12 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,463
173583328
(Comments: 1)
NTTrailsMEE
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Hello,
This introduced a gap in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/23406 . I've filled it in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173753564 .
Best Regards,
Andy

commented 2025-10-25 12:20:08 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦475
172845317
(Comments: 3)
philipcullen
(Discussed changesets: 23)
That's a good spot, I'd not quite understood that the substreet and parentstreet replaced street. I'll avoid adding streets where they are present.
commented 2025-10-25 12:10:14 UTC by philipcullen ♦13
168183268
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:56:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173749099
(Comments: 1)
Keyun2025
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij osm. Wat is bedoeling met deze toevoeging?
Mvg
eggie
commented 2025-10-25 11:53:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
171785100
(Comments: 1)
johanbont
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Bonjour, quelles sont vos sources pour procéder à des modifications dans OSM ? Plusieurs de vos liens contiennent vers des sites web contiennent des trackeur google maps. Les CGU de Google Maps contreviennent avec l'édition ...
commented 2025-10-25 11:52:40 UTC by blm07 ♦5
173752339
(Comments: 1)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Ik zie al wat ik hier beter kan doen
commented 2025-10-25 11:52:22 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12
168292212
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:38:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
148060872
(Comments: 2)
Thibtib51
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi Lyctkel,
You're right and I change it. Thank you for your help :).
Best Regards,
Thibtib51
commented 2025-10-25 11:35:50 UTC by Thibtib51 ♦4
173499885
(Comments: 4)
Farsida
(Discussed changesets: 9)
Я бы не назвал лесом несколько деревьев на территориях гостиниц. Но если вы считаете, что я ошибся, можете откатить мои изменения.
commented 2025-10-25 11:35:13 UTC by Farsida ♦3
168560772
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:21:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
168560857
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:20:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173749215
(Comments: 1)
rigilk3nt
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Hi

Top Quelle :)

Passt du die Eigenschaften noch vollständig an? Alles was nicht mehr ist entweder mit lebenszyklus (was:*=* oder destroyed:*=*) oder, wenn es nicht mehr gebraucht wird, weg.

Cheers
Silversurfer83
commented 2025-10-25 11:20:16 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
168561519
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:19:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
168649628
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:18:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
168652202
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:18:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
168680756
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:12:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
168683439
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-25 11:12:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
102343460
(Comments: 1)
slymarekivan
(Discussed changesets: 35)
Zdravim, prosim nedavajte brany na chodnik, ktory len ide okolo brany/arealu a cez branu neprechadza. Vasim sposobom sme zablokovali aj chodnik (pre navigaciu).
Branu dajte na spolocny bod plotu okolo arealu a cestu, ktora smeruje do arealu (a mus...
commented 2025-10-25 11:04:13 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,699
173650999
(Comments: 1)
ingo-pech
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Algbtq for more information.
commented 2025-10-25 11:02:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173749207
(Comments: 3)
mueschel
(Discussed changesets: 890)
Den Link zur Diskussion hab ich extra hinzugefügt, aus dem hervorgeht, dass es da keinen "gängigen Tag" gibt.
commented 2025-10-25 10:43:48 UTC by syncronic ♦34
173438666
(Comments: 3)
001100N277
(Discussed changesets: 4)
👍
commented 2025-10-25 10:41:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173750102
(Comments: 1)
mohammed yassen
(Discussed changesets: 1)
قبر الشهيدين السعيدين ياسين الجنابي وابنه مرتضى


commented 2025-10-25 10:37:53 UTC by mohammed yassen ♦1
173724598
(Comments: 2)
Benji Gillman
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thanks for the feedback and the welcome! Yes, I see I've used an incorrect tag. I'll check the wiki more from now on 👍

I'll remove that tag now.
commented 2025-10-25 10:37:52 UTC by Benji Gillman ♦1
171535856
(Comments: 2)
001100N277
(Discussed changesets: 4)
check, aangepast
commented 2025-10-25 10:30:41 UTC by 001100N277 ♦2
173732022
(Comments: 2)
draconic_mapper
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hi, thanks for finding that. It means I should have taken a break from mapping earlier :P It was a mistake while entering name, I typed over the key instead of the value in the dialog ;) I have fixed it, along with the street next to it where the sam...
commented 2025-10-25 10:21:10 UTC by draconic_mapper ♦6
173748976
(Comments: 2)
AndreKruger
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Created nodes"
commented 2025-10-25 10:16:57 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173327519
(Comments: 5)
vanagaudi
(Discussed changesets: 27)
@tux67: Das ist richtig. In diesem Fall jedoch beabsichtigt, um herauszufinden, welcher Tag zu der fehlerhaften Darstellung führt. Da der überflüssige Eintrag zu keinem Fehler führt, habe ich mir erlaubt, diesen Eintrag zu erstell...
commented 2025-10-25 10:14:50 UTC by vanagaudi ♦30
135785175
(Comments: 1)
541074
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Diese Änderung (und die darauffolgenden) versteh ich nicht. An den zwei Stellen sind doch gar keine Ampeln.
commented 2025-10-25 10:14:20 UTC by kadiwa ♦44
15800492
(Comments: 6)
marco406
(Discussed changesets: 26)
skasowałem
commented 2025-10-25 09:53:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173744915
(Comments: 1)
nmimn
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Prosím proč jsi odstranil dětské brouzdaliště z areálu koupaliště v Sázavě? Ještě na podzim tam bylo, už je zbouráno?
commented 2025-10-25 09:39:33 UTC by vrabcak ♦3
173747498
(Comments: 1)
ieguy3
(Discussed changesets: 6)
https://www.buckeyeaz.gov/government/city-clerk/mayor-and-council/see-a-map-of-district-boundaries
commented 2025-10-25 09:34:50 UTC by ieguy3 ♦6
173700990
(Comments: 2)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
SHITCOINS.CLUB practices unlicensed activity, faces regulatory scrutiny across the EU, has no verified authorization in Romania, and is widely reported by users as unreliable or fraudulent, making its inclusion a reputational and legal risk
commented 2025-10-25 09:32:01 UTC by Alex Topo ♦6
173700876
(Comments: 2)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
SHITCOINS.CLUB practices unlicensed activity, faces regulatory scrutiny across the EU, has no verified authorization in Romania, and is widely reported by users as unreliable or fraudulent, making its inclusion a reputational and legal risk
commented 2025-10-25 09:31:59 UTC by Alex Topo ♦6
173700856
(Comments: 2)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
SHITCOINS.CLUB practices unlicensed activity, faces regulatory scrutiny across the EU, has no verified authorization in Romania, and is widely reported by users as unreliable or fraudulent, making its inclusion a reputational and legal risk
commented 2025-10-25 09:31:56 UTC by Alex Topo ♦6
173700801
(Comments: 2)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
SHITCOINS.CLUB practices unlicensed activity, faces regulatory scrutiny across the EU, has no verified authorization in Romania, and is widely reported by users as unreliable or fraudulent, making its inclusion a reputational and legal risk.
commented 2025-10-25 09:31:31 UTC by Alex Topo ♦6
173747249
(Comments: 1)
Sylabowy Kot
(Discussed changesets: 102)
Jestem świadomy, że SKANSKA zapewnie zajmie przynajmniej część pozostałego brownfieldu z racji na brak zapowiedzi, że coś się tam innego w najbliższym czasie zacznie robić. Gdyby tak zaszło, proponuję po prostu zamienić landuse=brownfie...
commented 2025-10-25 09:21:20 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267
126823563
(Comments: 4)
Pieter Vander Vennet
(Discussed changesets: 169)
Btw, the cycle zone is the result of our work, using OSM to measure street widths: https://fietsersbond.be/brugge/nieuws/fietszone-lijkt-aangewezen-na-opmeting-van-de-brugse-binnenstad/
commented 2025-10-25 09:21:01 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦454
173676490
(Comments: 1)
Simon Hedvig
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Pridávať obchody ako body je správny postup.
Ale ak adresa je už na budove netreba ju dávať duplicitne aj do bodu, aplikácie si ju prevezmú z budovy.
Tiež je dobré pridávať obchodom otv&aacu...
commented 2025-10-25 09:06:36 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248
173746263
(Comments: 1)
Dwain Zwerg
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Nochmal als Nicht Short-URL https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/faehren-zum-dockland-fallen-bis-ende-november-aus,kurzehh-1310.html
commented 2025-10-25 09:04:22 UTC by Dwain Zwerg ♦5
173746237
(Comments: 1)
bjnk954
(Discussed changesets: 23)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je...
commented 2025-10-25 09:00:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173672584
(Comments: 1)
SamuelBuchlak
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Je dobré pridávať obchodom otváracie hodiny.
commented 2025-10-25 09:00:34 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248
173671975
(Comments: 1)
Igor_6
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Je dobré pridávať aj otváracie hodiny.
commented 2025-10-25 08:57:42 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248
173671760
(Comments: 1)
PeterHrcka
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Je dobré pridávať aj otváracie hodiny.
commented 2025-10-25 08:55:56 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248
173646364
(Comments: 4)
kasmar00
(Discussed changesets: 30)
Thanks, that make sense and that must have been what I wanted to do.
commented 2025-10-25 08:46:46 UTC by kasmar00 ♦63
157788834
(Comments: 1)
nilogian
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Tutte le tue modifiche vicino a OBI sono sbagliate o disegnate male, le sto correggendo.
commented 2025-10-25 08:45:57 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110
173671542
(Comments: 1)
janirek
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Značka shop=yes nestačí, treba vybrať konkrétne aký je to obchod https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:shop

Na obchody je lepšie pridať len bod a nie použiť celý rodinný dom. Tiež tam ch&ya...
commented 2025-10-25 08:38:25 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248
164256130
(Comments: 1)
Chenshi
(Discussed changesets: 33)
Moin!
Du hast hier den Pipeline-Marker https://www.osm.org/node/12609176826 mit der Leitung verbunden. Das habe ich rückgängig gemacht : https://www.osm.org/changeset/173744002

Falls es Absicht war: Der Marker (ein gelber Pfosten)...
commented 2025-10-25 08:38:20 UTC by GerdP ♦2,780
173741026
(Comments: 2)
Michał Paluchowski
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Curtis Plaza dawno już zniknęła. Stoją dwa żurawie i budowa nowych budynków ruszyła.
commented 2025-10-25 08:35:41 UTC by Michał Paluchowski ♦15
173667781
(Comments: 1)
Bohusmarian
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Pri pridávaní boxov si pozrite existujúce aké majú značky a pozrite si aj návod https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parcel_locker

Pomenovať bod názvom nestačí, apliká...
commented 2025-10-25 08:35:19 UTC by Dodko ♦1,248
173739564
(Comments: 1)
SweetGIS
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hello, and welcome to OSM!

May I ask where the name “New-Yorker-Landstraße” comes from? I wasn’t able to find anything similar in the Geoportal of the state of Hesse.

Thanks and best regards,
Pascal

---...
commented 2025-10-25 08:28:49 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173733809
(Comments: 1)
wegavision
(Discussed changesets: 127)
Le relazioni di percorsi a catasto nazionale non possono avere diramazioni.
Qui hai sdoppiato la relazione su un incrocio. 716B
commented 2025-10-25 08:21:25 UTC by Jrachi ♦798
173684167
(Comments: 1)
Arman Bin Alauddin
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1444303136. What is the mean of the tag Ablution Space = yes?
Did you see the other mosque https://www.osm.org/way/375513922. Which of this buildings exists?

commented 2025-10-25 08:21:04 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173729491
(Comments: 1)
wegavision
(Discussed changesets: 127)
Ciao.
Ti prego di non modificare le relazioni di percorsi escursionistici del catasto nazionale.
Li riconosci per la presenza del tag ref:REI
Se ti trovi ad inserire rotonde o comunque a modificare way dove passa una relazione hiking, ti pre...
commented 2025-10-25 08:15:45 UTC by Jrachi ♦798
173713897
(Comments: 1)
ross-map
(Discussed changesets: 28)
Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1444497600. What is the mean of the tags
AR_VMS_TY=05
CLASSREF=2e7fc599-5abd-49d8-a51e-1f8f4ebd2a74
COMUNE_IST=17076028
NOME_COM=CHIAROMONTE
NOME_PROV=POTENZA
PROVIN_IST=076
TI...
commented 2025-10-25 08:14:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
141134128
(Comments: 3)
Andre Engels
(Discussed changesets: 55)
Kijk anders even hier nog een keer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath

Het is al weer een tijd geleden. Wellicht doe je het nu wel goed?

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-25 08:11:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173720879
(Comments: 1)
Zenfiric
(Discussed changesets: 118)
Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1444526706 . what is the mean of the tag 3 = 6778728?
commented 2025-10-25 08:10:10 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173568358
(Comments: 1)
Kaisik
(Discussed changesets: 35)
Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1443597214. What is the mean of the tags
11=16?
commented 2025-10-25 08:07:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173728353
(Comments: 1)
NachoGtz
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please be careful! You moved the four nodes more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I must reverted your chnge set. Please take a new try to add ALPR withwout destroying the existing streets.
commented 2025-10-25 07:55:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173575519
(Comments: 7)
vectorial8192
(Discussed changesets: 61)
You are right. I was under the wrong impression that the west side `=primary` was a different road from Kam Tin Road.

Then, indeed, there is no symmetry, and this `=primary` should still be `=secondary` instead.
commented 2025-10-25 07:49:09 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦56
173704427
(Comments: 2)
Andy Lock
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Yes, you're right. I'll update this tomorrow.
Thanks for the suggestion and guidance.
commented 2025-10-25 07:48:49 UTC by Andy Lock ♦2
173729540
(Comments: 1)
natergibson
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please notice a name isn't a address! Did you see https://www.osm.org/way/419909888? Please move a address to the main building, not to the street crossing.
commented 2025-10-25 07:48:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173658890
(Comments: 4)
BCNorwich
(Discussed changesets: 237)
Hi Jan,
I've now looked at the whole junction layout and there are anomalies, I'll try to explain the logic I assume.

The 4 sections of ref N44, (Way: Leidsestraatweg (7471615), Way: Rijksstraatweg (1216487071), Way: Leidsestraatw...
commented 2025-10-25 07:36:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,948
173733870
(Comments: 1)
DZehavi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hello! Thanks for your modification.
Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/18068055, https://www.osm.org/way/35415556. There are still road overlaps here that cannot be resolved without local knowledge.
commented 2025-10-25 07:36:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173733789
(Comments: 2)
Swell Air Conditioning
(Discussed changesets: 2)
PLUS also please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: ...
commented 2025-10-25 07:27:37 UTC by Comino ♦202
173734163
(Comments: 1)
Swell Air Conditioning
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO...
commented 2025-10-25 07:26:14 UTC by Comino ♦202
172424950
(Comments: 1)
Karmicatosaurus
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Bonjour,
Les voies privées ne sont pas supprimer dans osm, pour indiquer le fait qu'elle soit privé, il faut utiliser le tag access=private
Bonne journée
commented 2025-10-25 07:09:26 UTC by jbcharron ♦123
173739666
(Comments: 1)
JustinJBrown
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
Please move the node to the main building. Could please add also the key religion, denormination, service_times?

commented 2025-10-25 07:08:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173740425
(Comments: 1)
ydounot90
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11552533563 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!

commented 2025-10-25 06:54:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
158478356
(Comments: 2)
Krithikrb
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Ok
commented 2025-10-25 06:44:44 UTC by Krithikrb ♦1
173640113
(Comments: 2)
en-wai06
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Will make sure of that next time.
Thanks for the feedback.
commented 2025-10-25 06:42:10 UTC by en-wai06 ♦1
173416332
(Comments: 1)
Hung159
(Discussed changesets: 9)
tại sao bạn xoá tag oneway=yes trên đường thuỵ khuê? đường này cấm ô tô vào từ lạc long quân nên tag oneway này đúng, và có các tag onewa...
commented 2025-10-25 06:31:24 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦14
173739272
(Comments: 1)
cheatach
(Discussed changesets: 26)
Ale głupota... Trzeba jakoś załatać dziurę w budżecie
commented 2025-10-25 06:17:47 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦761
172793917
(Comments: 1)
Wouter Huygens
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows the name to be Natuurdomein Spildoorn Vijver? I can't find it.
Thank you.
commented 2025-10-25 05:38:15 UTC by VLD549 ♦307
173695954
(Comments: 1)
lbellomo
(Discussed changesets: 4)
How do you differ from grass and grassland?
commented 2025-10-25 05:37:41 UTC by PcMouse1 ♦69
173732141
(Comments: 1)
Alp Utku
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Merhaba. Değiştirdiğiniz yol sınıflarının doğru olduğuna emin misiniz? Bölgeyi bilmiyorum fakat uydu görüntülerinden anlaşıldığı kadarıyla Bağdat Caddesi'ne paralel yol ile Adalı Sokağı'nın yol sını...
commented 2025-10-25 05:23:21 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦145
X173738140
(Comments: 2)
princemateenroyal122
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173741900
where the changeset comment is:
Remove spam
commented 2025-10-25 05:21:48 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173741120
(Comments: 1)
Lewis Munaz
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please take care not to connect the building nodes to the SRL
commented 2025-10-25 04:25:14 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64
173710117
(Comments: 1)
pjodhka90
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Please take care not to connect the building nodes to the SRL
commented 2025-10-25 04:25:05 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦64
173741082
(Comments: 1)
AkuAnakTimur
(Discussed changesets: 177)
Ground truth from May 2023
commented 2025-10-25 04:05:30 UTC by AkuAnakTimur ♦458
143727209
(Comments: 1)
Lockstar
(Discussed changesets: 65)
Hi, do you know for sure that there are bridges at way/1221714115? From what I can tell from GPS traces, the path does not actually cross the stream here (though I have not surveyed it)
commented 2025-10-25 03:30:57 UTC by radiotrefoil ♦115
173579170
(Comments: 1)
Chris Stanford
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Good go at trying to map the large building here, but always ensure that your edits agree with the latest imagery. Check the bottom right to see what imagery you're looking at when editing. You can see how I mapped it in Changeset: 173740593 I ...
commented 2025-10-25 03:26:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,056
172216922
(Comments: 1)
wolfy1339
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Même si le projet d'interchange est en pause, l'imagerie aérienne détaillée du MERN montre que la station d'interconnexion (chemin 1219412604) est pratiquement complétée. Il est important &agr...
commented 2025-10-25 01:58:05 UTC by PierZen ♦272
173130752
(Comments: 7)
無限の刃
(Discussed changesets: 9)
>あなたにとって不要な情報でも、他の方には必要な情報はたくさんあります。
そうですね。 他の方が追加なさることは認めます。申し訳ありませんが、私の編集による、編集時点...
commented 2025-10-25 01:56:47 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦28
172082027
(Comments: 1)
marxymarx
(Discussed changesets: 2)
старые названия уже имеются в теге old_name=*
commented 2025-10-25 01:27:39 UTC by slavan118 ♦3
173659839
(Comments: 1)
C2oc4
(Discussed changesets: 458)
Jeśli chcesz zwrócić uwagę na błąd na mapie, lepszym rozwiązaniem od note są uwagi.
commented 2025-10-25 01:24:20 UTC by olo81 ♦688
173584672
(Comments: 1)
Malema99
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hola.

El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página par...
commented 2025-10-25 01:22:59 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦356
173506793
(Comments: 1)
marxymarx
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Не надо удалять точки с описанием станций/остановочных пунктов. И тем более переносить теги на полигон!
commented 2025-10-25 01:22:58 UTC by slavan118 ♦3
173739077
(Comments: 2)
thd10045
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed toilet facility"
commented 2025-10-25 00:46:28 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173686299
(Comments: 1)
pnwcascades
(Discussed changesets: 5)
We don't use descriptive names, like closed landfill. Instead tag it as landuse=landfill + disued=yes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dlandfill
---

Published using OSMCha: https...
commented 2025-10-25 00:06:59 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448
173585975
(Comments: 1)
soloeye
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please don’t adjust road types based on navigation system behavior. Classifications should reflect real-world conditions, not routing outcomes.
commented 2025-10-25 00:04:39 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124
171244770
(Comments: 1)
AstroSinclaire
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Reverting changes so that it matches actual condition on roads. There are cycle paths/lanes here.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173738686
commented 2025-10-24 23:57:24 UTC by Tim Niblett ♦4
173738163
(Comments: 2)
Piotr Strębski
(Discussed changesets: 187)
Poprawione!
commented 2025-10-24 23:56:16 UTC by Piotr Strębski ♦185
173737316
(Comments: 1)
David L Hill
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Oops, didn't mean to botch that!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173737316

commented 2025-10-24 23:54:04 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208
172773459
(Comments: 1)
Wildsharky
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Just wanted to comment: I reverted N Empire Rd and Bard Creek Rd Back to tertiary since both the county and my Public Works contact at the town of Empire classify these two main roads as arterial roads for the area, as they connect Bard Creek Valley/...
commented 2025-10-24 23:41:48 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦5
173737923
(Comments: 1)
ika-chan!
(Discussed changesets: 76)
Thankfully, the changeset bounding box turned out to be tiny, but editing programs can be a bit of a troll at times.
commented 2025-10-24 23:17:59 UTC by ika-chan! ♦296
173648018
(Comments: 1)
Eunir Augusto
(Discussed changesets: 1)
o Bretas Em Minas Gerais Foi Vendido Para O Supermercados BH. A rede Supermercados BH comprou todas as operações do Bretas em Minas Gerais do grupo chileno Cencosud em fevereiro de 2025, por R$ 716 milhões
commented 2025-10-24 23:10:43 UTC by ricaestevao ♦3
173701012
(Comments: 1)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Why have you removed these points? This looks like vandalism. Please revert.
commented 2025-10-24 22:31:59 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22
173669052
(Comments: 2)
Adam Haba
(Discussed changesets: 120)
Dobrze, zmienię następnym razem opis
commented 2025-10-24 22:16:32 UTC by Adam Haba ♦27
173620869
(Comments: 1)
MAG_OSM
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbe...
commented 2025-10-24 22:09:01 UTC by tastrax ♦1,171
173736183
(Comments: 1)
Fgjgdrou
(Discussed changesets: 11)
*restricted byways
commented 2025-10-24 22:08:10 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13
173736406
(Comments: 1)
Fgjgdrou
(Discussed changesets: 11)
*restricted byways
commented 2025-10-24 22:07:54 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13
173736440
(Comments: 1)
Fgjgdrou
(Discussed changesets: 11)
*restricted byways
commented 2025-10-24 22:07:42 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13
173736524
(Comments: 1)
Fgjgdrou
(Discussed changesets: 11)
*restricted byways
commented 2025-10-24 22:07:33 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13
173736553
(Comments: 1)
Fgjgdrou
(Discussed changesets: 11)
*restricted byways
commented 2025-10-24 22:07:23 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦13
173700230
(Comments: 1)
jimmyjamjar10101
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hot tip - in ID editor - Q on the keyboard will square the corners of buildings etc and O will make something circular
commented 2025-10-24 21:58:42 UTC by tastrax ♦1,171
173736389
(Comments: 1)
KhalidKashmiri
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Plan SOR na https://zielonyursus.pl/ursus-podsumowanie-inwestycji-lipiec-2025/ jest chyba aktualny, ale w kiepskiej jakości i bez oznakowania
commented 2025-10-24 21:57:35 UTC by KhalidKashmiri ♦9
173731372
(Comments: 1)
bzzzkrk
(Discussed changesets: 25)
Przystanek tramwajowy to nie jest highway=platform tylko railway=platform i na Wzgórzach przy tych peronach nie będzie autobusów.
Podczas edycji skasowałeś dodane punkty zatrzymania oraz relacje, a następnie dodałeś miejsce zat...
commented 2025-10-24 21:57:02 UTC by Bartek444 ♦24
149039031
(Comments: 1)
AE35
(Discussed changesets: 58)
Synes det ser ud til, at du bruger 'lanes=2' på veje uden markerede kørebaner (fx Galpestykket (4333600)) Selvom der er færdsel i begge retninger, skal man så egentlig ikke bruge 'lane_markings=no' ?
commented 2025-10-24 21:56:19 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦108
138885679
(Comments: 1)
starfury7
(Discussed changesets: 4)
ist da echt ein Bildstock? sh. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4697355
commented 2025-10-24 21:47:35 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394
173630062
(Comments: 2)
Jannik E
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Sorry, mein Fehler. Du scheinst nach mehr recherche recht zu haben.
commented 2025-10-24 21:30:37 UTC by Jannik E ♦2
172336457
(Comments: 2)
Razieru
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Спасибо. А я обычно не прописываю теги вручную, а просто заполняю через iD предложенные поля. Тогда сейчас пробегусь по всем зебрам что уж...
commented 2025-10-24 21:29:50 UTC by Razieru ♦2
172080886
(Comments: 3)
Rawmance
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hyvä tietää, ja kiitokset oleellisista karttamuutoksista.
commented 2025-10-24 21:23:43 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦69
173656787
(Comments: 2)
BakedCake02
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Noted. I'm going to delete the relation, I just thought they needed a relation because they share the same building.
commented 2025-10-24 21:11:10 UTC by BakedCake02 ♦1
173638034
(Comments: 3)
highpotential
(Discussed changesets: 16)
erledigt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173735179
commented 2025-10-24 21:06:13 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦835
171876941
(Comments: 1)
oudalricus
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi, hatte den Weg zwischenzeitlich auf "path" geändert, weil kein Verkehrzeichen vorhanden ist. Sehe mich im Wiki-Eintrag zu highway=footway eigentlich bestätigt.
commented 2025-10-24 21:02:59 UTC by p1230 ♦14
102745609
(Comments: 1)
hannahrm
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi Hanna. Fedback on way 881221713.
I would not tag it with bicycle=yes. Unless I have overlooked something, on the ground there is no sign indicating bicycle use. If it is used habitually by cyclists despite this, you could tag it with bicycle=pe...
commented 2025-10-24 20:59:05 UTC by voschix ♦187
173728929
(Comments: 4)
Emble agency
(Discussed changesets: 1)
We zetten in geval van meerdere bedrijven die hetzelfde adres delen gewoon nog een adresnode.
Stork had ik verwijderd.

Ik heb even een identiek adresnode bijgemaakt. Die kun je evt een aantal keren kopiëren en van bedrijfsinfo voorzie...
commented 2025-10-24 20:54:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173725276
(Comments: 1)
sheillahnayiga
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Hi,
could you fix all the issues you have created ? (red nodes here : https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.55244&lat=3.85195&zoom=13&baselayer=OSM%20Carto%20(OSMF)&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle...
commented 2025-10-24 20:48:37 UTC by Yunan973 ♦79
170997641
(Comments: 5)
bernward1
(Discussed changesets: 13)
du hattest sie auf
disused:type gesetzt.
Das sollte doch reichen um sie von der neuen VRM180 zu unterscheiden.
commented 2025-10-24 20:32:15 UTC by bernward1 ♦19
107401059
(Comments: 7)
Marcello Perathoner
(Discussed changesets: 24)
Ah, schon gefunden, dort steht Sosseneck.
commented 2025-10-24 20:23:53 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394
163836445
(Comments: 2)
ion_chi
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Please delete it. It was probably a heatmap artifact
commented 2025-10-24 20:18:48 UTC by ion_chi ♦35
161257412
(Comments: 1)
Barroszt
(Discussed changesets: 426)
Mógłbyś popatrzeć w okolicę https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8835785960 bo tam zupełnie to co narysowałeś nie odpowiada tym co widać na ortofoto..
commented 2025-10-24 20:10:23 UTC by IreuN ♦74
173733708
(Comments: 1)
notmyproblem1
(Discussed changesets: 29)
sorry for the big changeset
commented 2025-10-24 20:09:07 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110
143935242
(Comments: 3)
goaned
(Discussed changesets: 7)
Hi goaned,
danke für die schnelle Antwort und Bearbeitung.
Schönes Wochenende,
lyctkel
commented 2025-10-24 20:00:39 UTC by lyctkel ♦346
173648616
(Comments: 7)
resitive
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hoi..

Weg is inderdaad weg, maar op de luchtfoto zijn ze nog te herkennen...
Je zou dan railway=razed kunnen gebruiken. Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed

Het is geen ra...
commented 2025-10-24 20:00:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173728306
(Comments: 2)
marazzer
(Discussed changesets: 41)
Hej, dzięki. Nie zauważyłem przy zmianie nazwy ulicy.
commented 2025-10-24 19:53:39 UTC by marazzer ♦47
173329483
(Comments: 6)
Lisapple
(Discussed changesets: 36)
On est bien d'accord. J'avais vu passer cette page des records (qui ne précise pas la précision supposée), moi c'est une bàl du coin (celle des 5 chemins à Guidel) "au numéro près&q...
commented 2025-10-24 19:33:08 UTC by trial ♦957
173648077
(Comments: 2)
resitive
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Ha eggie, bedankt voor de oplettenheid
commented 2025-10-24 19:31:57 UTC by resitive ♦3
173730988
(Comments: 1)
zeelsag
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Beste ,

name= niet gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Ook niet in het Engels.
Ik heb name= ... verwijderd
MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-24 19:11:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173725095
(Comments: 2)
zeelsag
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Naam en duplicated tagging verwijderd
commented 2025-10-24 19:10:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
165483169
(Comments: 3)
gtfs2osm-il
(Discussed changesets: 7)
שכחתי לומר, מספיק אחד מהשניים:

highway=bus_stop

או

public_transport=platform
bus=yes

אבל כאמור, הם לא היו. הבלבול הוא נפוץ כי בעברית אומרים "תח...
commented 2025-10-24 19:07:42 UTC by NeatNit ♦39
170752647
(Comments: 3)
kitsee
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Hi there Gary,
It doesn't appear to be widespread, affecting only affecting a couple of areas in this grid. honestly no idea why this happen. I've now delete them. Thanks for point this out.
commented 2025-10-24 19:01:24 UTC by kitsee ♦105
173296247
(Comments: 5)
PWSpaces
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Let me check into that and see if I can get some solid advice for you. Would you mind messaging me on OpenStreetMap (not in this changeset, as it's public) with your email address so I can follow up with you there?
commented 2025-10-24 18:58:32 UTC by MapAwayThePain ♦12
173718117
(Comments: 1)
2137xd
(Discussed changesets: 22)
I tak pewnie niedługo cała reszta DK7 zostanie zmieniona na trunk: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pl:Tag:highway=trunk#G%C5%82osowanie_-_2._tura
commented 2025-10-24 18:57:08 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦295
173645787
(Comments: 2)
jumbanho
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Thanks!
commented 2025-10-24 18:55:34 UTC by jumbanho ♦149
173192707
(Comments: 1)
rayan54
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonsoir,
Merci pour vos contributions
Pour information, sur un rond point on doit ajout le tag junction roundabout pour indiquer explicitement que c'est un rond-point, je viens de corriger
Bonne soirée
Jean-Baptiste
commented 2025-10-24 18:55:20 UTC by jbcharron ♦123
54565007
(Comments: 1)
ph71
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Is there any unit? Some number of door?
commented 2025-10-24 18:46:04 UTC by AF HAF KARTOGRAF ♦64
173622541
(Comments: 1)
mlange_nbg
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Review siehe PN
commented 2025-10-24 18:41:25 UTC by pyram ♦512
X173691990
(Comments: 2)
lbellomo
(Discussed changesets: 4)
horrible change, shame on you
commented 2025-10-24 18:31:21 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21
155233980
(Comments: 1)
Chemnitzer13
(Discussed changesets: 16)
Hi Chemnitzer13,

Do you recall from where you got these uic_ref codes? They don't match with the official source - National Railway Infrastructure Company (НКЖИ).

For example Добрич Север is listed as 5229711 but you...
commented 2025-10-24 18:10:45 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦727
173504926
(Comments: 1)
pal22
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Om du skal redigere landcover så må du setter deg inn i korleis relasjonar og multipolys virkar.
commented 2025-10-24 18:07:21 UTC by Gazer75 ♦290
173728288
(Comments: 1)
osm_sense
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Wir taggen/kartieren nur Sichtbares, nicht das, was erst in 50/100 Jahren geplant ist.

Über unser/mein Tagging hier, wie das korrekt oder verbessert/korrigiert werden soll, darf und soll diskutiert werden - aber wir taggen/kartieren nur S...
commented 2025-10-24 18:01:31 UTC by osm_sense ♦1
168874039
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:56:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
168902959
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:55:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173727618
(Comments: 1)
Mastodommte
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Nbr 85 was already correctly mapped, this is next door.

Please respect our work and do not add duplicate addresses.
commented 2025-10-24 17:55:12 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
173679363
(Comments: 1)
Matty Smart
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi Matty,
There wasn't a level 10 boundary for Redcar because there is no Redcar town/parish council. What source did you use to establish that this is the boundary of "Redcar"?
Also, it is "traditional" to re-use bound...
commented 2025-10-24 17:53:44 UTC by Colin Smale ♦323
169901106
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:53:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
169904904
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:53:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
169905752
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:51:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
169919803
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:51:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170006242
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:48:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170118634
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:46:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170120699
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:45:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173727779
(Comments: 1)
Sim100v
(Discussed changesets: 11)
place=isolated_dwelling.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling

Ici, en pleine ville ??
Vos ajouts dans OpenStreetMap ne sont pas sérieux, nous n’arrêtons pas de devoir corriger vos erreur...
commented 2025-10-24 17:44:40 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
171838201
(Comments: 2)
bhmaps
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Stimmt, danke für den Hinweis. Ist socket:type2. Habs korrigiert. Werde demnächst mal alle meine Änderungen durchschauen..
commented 2025-10-24 17:40:28 UTC by bhmaps ♦3
170169321
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:38:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170491522
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:35:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170513356
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:34:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170524825
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:33:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170538923
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:32:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173706945
(Comments: 3)
Dillen GJ
(Discussed changesets: 62)
Ik sluit tevens de note nu van de anonieme tipgever
commented 2025-10-24 17:32:29 UTC by Dillen GJ ♦42
173681285
(Comments: 5)
martin hamel
(Discussed changesets: 8)
cool merci!

commented 2025-10-24 17:31:54 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦432
170539718
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:27:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170581446
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:27:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
171368723
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:24:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
171370797
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:23:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
159631946
(Comments: 1)
WieKo68
(Discussed changesets: 418)
Cześć WieKo68, z jakiego źródła są te granice parafii? Na ile są precyzyjne?

Zrobiłem małą edycję w Luboniu i na krótkim odcinku scaliłem granicę parafii z administracyjną: https://www.osm.org/way/1443932297
Teraz...
commented 2025-10-24 17:22:18 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦402
171371199
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:18:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
171968782
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:18:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
171970544
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:16:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
171971947
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:15:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172021237
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:15:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172022825
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:10:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173517357
(Comments: 1)
Starboy Infinity
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hi, Starboy Infinity!
Thank you for your contribution to the OSM.

Could you please provide the source for this mapped complex? It doesn't look real. It was mapped some years ago, but wasn’t constructed yet, as I see on the lates...
commented 2025-10-24 17:09:35 UTC by ZhannaB ♦10
172069496
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:08:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172126875
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:07:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172298020
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:04:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173715533
(Comments: 1)
jaqba
(Discussed changesets: 2)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-24 17:03:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173727350
(Comments: 1)
Ras1985
(Discussed changesets: 1)
🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic...
commented 2025-10-24 17:03:46 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173724472
(Comments: 1)
maraf24
(Discussed changesets: 617)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13254461826
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
commented 2025-10-24 17:03:42 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
172309818
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:03:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172354343
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:02:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172355332
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 17:02:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172577768
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:59:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172617701
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:58:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172625921
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:57:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172626992
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:57:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173723280
(Comments: 1)
Imkerei Frerichs
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Placing a POI on the driveway is not allowed. That's why I've adjusted things to comply with the rules on OSM.
commented 2025-10-24 16:56:49 UTC by Comino ♦202
172664128
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:56:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172666823
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:56:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172751424
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:55:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173724520
(Comments: 1)
Discount House Furniture
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/162153490
more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the node back to the original position.

commented 2025-10-24 16:54:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173701184
(Comments: 1)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Why have you removed these points? This looks like vandalism. Please revert.
commented 2025-10-24 16:41:57 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22
173701129
(Comments: 1)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Why have you removed these points? This looks like vandalism. Please revert.
commented 2025-10-24 16:41:18 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22
164367333
(Comments: 1)
mueschel
(Discussed changesets: 890)
This tag was intentionally added, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Angers/Arbres_signaux.
commented 2025-10-24 16:40:18 UTC by Ltrlg ♦79
172761102
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:38:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
170306411
(Comments: 4)
ÖTK
(Discussed changesets: 43)
Merci! Benutzer ÖTK ist leider schon fast 2 Monate nicht mehr auf OSM aktiv gewesen.
commented 2025-10-24 16:37:02 UTC by kuhni74 ♦394
173701288
(Comments: 1)
Alex Topo
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Why have you removed these points?
commented 2025-10-24 16:35:56 UTC by descubrebitcoin ♦22
173700405
(Comments: 1)
Mondeval2455
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Il commento al changeset non è modificabile e l'ho riportato errato, correzione:

Modifiche non discusse con la comunità nel campo "name". Le condizioni dai revert precedenti non risultano soddisfatte affinché...
commented 2025-10-24 16:33:58 UTC by Mondeval2455 ♦1
155011721
(Comments: 4)
maximiliansr
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hab mir das angeschaut. Da steht ein Poller am Wegrand, aber der versperrt nichts. Ausserdem steht da ein Schild, dass es eine Sackgasse für mehrspurige Fahrzeuge ist. Wäre ja sinnlos, wenn man da gar nicht reinfahren könnte. Ich werde...
commented 2025-10-24 16:18:39 UTC by GerdP ♦2,780
172801420
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:13:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172620500
(Comments: 2)
Przemysław69
(Discussed changesets: 12)
Cześć,
Rzeczywiście, wkradły mi się jakieś nieplanowane zmiany ;P. Poprawione!
Dzięki za czujność.
Pozdrawiam
commented 2025-10-24 16:12:45 UTC by Przemysław69 ♦1
164649036
(Comments: 6)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
Jestem w trakcie wycofania wszystkich zniszczeń i prawdopodobnych zniszczeń wykonanych przez tą osobę
commented 2025-10-24 16:10:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
172920157
(Comments: 2)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:09:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173723427
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:08:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173723943
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 16:06:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173687202
(Comments: 3)
AgusQui
(Discussed changesets: 197)
https://buenosaires.gob.ar/noticias/continuidad-de-la-calle-besares-para-mejorar-la-conexion-en-saavedra
commented 2025-10-24 16:02:44 UTC by i2004 ♦166
125951444
(Comments: 4)
Vonter
(Discussed changesets: 28)
If there is absolutely no physical trace of a drain in the area, then deleting it would be the right way to go. I believe in this case it is more likely that there is a minor seasonal drain, but it may not be easily evident from aerial imagery. I...
commented 2025-10-24 16:00:11 UTC by Vonter ♦76
173720891
(Comments: 1)
Cricri93160
(Discussed changesets: 12)
## REVERTED
This is not a one-way street.
Vehicles coming from G. Thys may legally turn right into it, and cyclists+buses use it in both directions.
Sorry, but we’ll have to undo your unsourced changeset.
commented 2025-10-24 15:59:39 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,602
173717443
(Comments: 5)
foreigner037
(Discussed changesets: 31)
То направо трябва диплома да може да се оправи човек с всичките начини на тагване.
commented 2025-10-24 15:46:59 UTC by foreigner037 ♦66
173703527
(Comments: 5)
redrace
(Discussed changesets: 60)
Huhu
Hab ich schon gelesen. Ich muss da im Frühjahr mal mit dem Rennrad hin!
commented 2025-10-24 15:42:46 UTC by redrace ♦163
173712994
(Comments: 5)
foreigner037
(Discussed changesets: 31)
@foreigner037 пак е скандализирал и разгорещил атмосферата :P:D (hug)
Наистина, пусни една тема във форума.
commented 2025-10-24 15:34:45 UTC by Fraxi ♦169
172922259
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 15:32:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173013282
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 15:31:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173722835
(Comments: 2)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Verder is het wel een gebruikersvriendelijke kaart haha
commented 2025-10-24 15:31:05 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12
173098038
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 15:30:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173722862
(Comments: 2)
Hardenzielig
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Ik heb het aangepast als voorbeeld.
commented 2025-10-24 15:26:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173691719
(Comments: 1)
lbellomo
(Discussed changesets: 4)
By the way, landuse=grass is valid: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035611919
commented 2025-10-24 15:23:08 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦232
173711369
(Comments: 1)
jano1982
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Здравствуйте! Вы запросили посмотреть ваши правки.

А можете рассказать почему вы решили поменять тип дороги и удалили несколько точ...
commented 2025-10-24 15:18:13 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦200
173722305
(Comments: 3)
Hardenzielig
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hier een voorbeeld van een paardenbak.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.772876/4.682523
commented 2025-10-24 15:16:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173239639
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 15:12:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
173722266
(Comments: 2)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Top! Zal is kijken de komende dagen of ik meer kleine dingen kan aanpassen. Heel veel dank voor de tips!
commented 2025-10-24 15:11:46 UTC by JacobPrinsen ♦12
173542098
(Comments: 1)
Map_Rivers
(Discussed changesets: 200)
reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer...
commented 2025-10-24 15:11:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,302
31627439
(Comments: 1)
demetrio_m
(Discussed changesets: 18)
Ciao.
Solitamente ele si usa per indicare l'altitudine espresso in metri.
Tu hai scritto: 5600 (1707)
E soprattutto: hai inserito come fonte Bing che non ha dati di elevazione!

Ivo
commented 2025-10-24 14:52:26 UTC by Jrachi ♦798
173719658
(Comments: 9)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Ga gerust je gang.
Niet te veel in één keer.
Dan ben je ook geen goede toevoegingen kwijt bij een revert door een validator.
Veel plezier met mappen.
Bij twijfel kun je een hokje aanvinken met het verzoek of een ervaren m...
commented 2025-10-24 14:46:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173718637
(Comments: 1)
SamNuttall
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Dag Sam
oneway=no is default op wegen. Svp niet toevoegen aan alle wegen in Nederland. :)
lanes=2 is niet van toepassing in die woonstraten.

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-24 14:42:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173313161
(Comments: 2)
JenkoL
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi. Another issue
Images are taken under a certain degree so you see both the roof and a siding.
A gable roof has a bend at its highest point. Map this roof as a single rectangular object because, when viewed from directly above, the roof is re...
commented 2025-10-24 14:28:05 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
173715772
(Comments: 4)
JacobPrinsen
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Jacob..

leisure=park is een functie en niet de landuse (Dus wat je ziet)

Je zult dus over water, bos gras e.d een extra vlak moeten leggen met leisure=park name=.........

Niet de landuse omtaggen naar een functie.
MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-24 14:10:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
161831102
(Comments: 1)
Ecilas
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Bonjour,
cela ne va pas ce que tu as fait sur le bâtiment Crystal, il faut utiliser des building:part pour chacun des étages.
C'est un peu compliqué alors je me propose de corriger. Peux-tu me dire à quels &eacut...
commented 2025-10-24 14:05:54 UTC by Yunan973 ♦79
173659214
(Comments: 1)
HugoC01
(Discussed changesets: 23)
Très bon jardinage, merci !
commented 2025-10-24 13:51:13 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦158
173671812
(Comments: 1)
Marten K
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Der Vollständigkeit halber (nicht von mir):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173715534
commented 2025-10-24 13:49:46 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
173673163
(Comments: 3)
Marten K
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi :)

Thema Wald:

Es ist prinzipiell nicht verboten einzelne Bäume zu erfassen. Für eine Ansammlung vieler Bäume, die einen Wald bilden haben wir bei OSM jedoch die oben verlinkten Möglichkeiten Wälder zu erfass...
commented 2025-10-24 13:47:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
173718655
(Comments: 1)
draconic_mapper
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Forgot to add TIGER as a source. I used it for street names.
commented 2025-10-24 13:38:56 UTC by draconic_mapper ♦6
173718644
(Comments: 1)
borovac
(Discussed changesets: 60)
Fixing broken boundaries #MSFTOpenMaps
I accidentally left the wrong comment.
commented 2025-10-24 13:37:48 UTC by borovac ♦106
137914479
(Comments: 1)
jslawin2
(Discussed changesets: 48)
Mam nadzieję, że nie popełniasz już takich błędów z mapowaniem ogrodzeń. Większą pożyteczność ma oznaczenie bram, niż dawanie barrier=fence dla niedokładnie oznaczonych obszarów, do tego bez oznaczonych wejść.
commented 2025-10-24 13:36:52 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267
173673841
(Comments: 5)
Marten K
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hallo Marten,

Thema Nutzbare Quellen:
- Beste Quelle: Unsere Augen. Also durch die Gegend laufen und sich Sachen notieren oder direkt mit einem Editor auf dem Smartphone erfassen/ändern

- Weitere Quellen: Prinzipiell sind die Bi...
commented 2025-10-24 13:35:46 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
172319480
(Comments: 1)
Carmen Hall
(Discussed changesets: 1)
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect fro...
commented 2025-10-24 13:29:59 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
157149566
(Comments: 1)
Olsza_R
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hej, ta nazwa "Rofa" jest tylko w źródłach historycznych i nie jest już używana, prawda?
commented 2025-10-24 13:29:08 UTC by YomanNH ♦387
172723942
(Comments: 3)
sashnikus_sashnikutus22229
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Posprzątałem po tym ruskim trollu.
commented 2025-10-24 13:22:18 UTC by YomanNH ♦387
173680687
(Comments: 2)
RSR2003
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hello. No response has been given, and, in conversation with other mappers, it appears that no one actually uses the names and modifications you are using. Besides, you are only changing the name:es tag in most of the changes, which doesn't make...
commented 2025-10-24 13:20:30 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,544
173707756
(Comments: 1)
STRANNIK_MINSK
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Добрый день.
Пожалуйста, поаккуратнее с удалением линий. Вы удалили здание больницы. Пришлось его восстанавливать.

И я очень попрош...
commented 2025-10-24 13:19:41 UTC by Prusaker ♦144
173699982
(Comments: 3)
96arsh
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi 96arsh :)

thanks for contributing. Much appreciated.

I'd like to point out a couple of things to help you make better decicions in the future:

- Trent Bridge is a statium. The pitch is inside. Please change it back to lei...
commented 2025-10-24 13:17:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,675
168982468
(Comments: 1)
sashnikus_sashnikutus22229
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Wycofałem nadanie nazw do uliczek wewnątrz osiedla.
commented 2025-10-24 13:12:13 UTC by YomanNH ♦387
173717326
(Comments: 1)
TinPetreković
(Discussed changesets: 163)
The accidentally created node was deleted in changeset 173717543

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173717543
commented 2025-10-24 13:11:59 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178
152474054
(Comments: 1)
Thelone1986
(Discussed changesets: 4)
bonjour, la ville considère ce chemin comme aménagé pour vélo > hihway = cycleway + foot:yes ?
commented 2025-10-24 13:07:31 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15
159408332
(Comments: 1)
Thelone1986
(Discussed changesets: 4)
bonjour, la ville considère ce chemin comme aménagé pour vélo > hihway = cycleway + foot:yes ?
commented 2025-10-24 13:07:14 UTC by fredlenoir ♦15
173672844
(Comments: 1)
Yehudah777
(Discussed changesets: 5)
reverted: officially there is just no such thing as daba within Tbilisi admin structure. There is Vake raioni, and within it Tsqneti ubani (which includes everything up to Betania). So Tsqneti now qualifies only as an unofficial place, that is, neigh...
commented 2025-10-24 13:07:07 UTC by yelisey90 ♦184
173712562
(Comments: 1)
emret
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Dzg emret. Wanneer de toegangsweg door het gebouw loopt geen layer=-2 gebruiken.
Het is gewoon eigenlijk layer=0 en dat taggen we niet.
Onder een gebouw gebruik je dan covered=yes als extra tag. Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
commented 2025-10-24 13:07:02 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
173696116
(Comments: 1)
ZMHtay
(Discussed changesets: 5)
Hello! Please use the key man_made instead of "man made".
commented 2025-10-24 13:03:32 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173691931
(Comments: 1)
Vasco Jesus
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bom dia,

Fizeste bastante alterações, no entanto não forneceste fontes para as mesmas.

Modificaste a hierarquia de vias de secundária para primária:
- Alameda da Europa
- Alameda Pêro da Co...
commented 2025-10-24 12:56:04 UTC by JoaoPaixao ♦15
173714803
(Comments: 1)
Robin343
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community



commented 2025-10-24 12:55:17 UTC by eggie ♦42,190
75587796
(Comments: 2)
MossWaffles
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Alas, talk of "fiction" here seems to have put this mapper off contributing - they made no more edits after this.
I walked along Apperley Road last night and noticed some problems remain, such as you can see at
https://www.openstreet...
commented 2025-10-24 12:47:40 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485
173715813
(Comments: 2)
Kitsunderoku>w^
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Basado en tus ediciones de mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he redactado una sugerencia para lo que podría parecer un comentario: "Agregué árbol con transformador, detalles de hoja caduca y latifoliada"
(Auto-transl...
commented 2025-10-24 12:46:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173706895
(Comments: 2)
Mattingham83
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello, you're quite correct! I'll change it back. Thanks for letting me know.
commented 2025-10-24 12:45:58 UTC by Mattingham83 ♦2
173689917
(Comments: 2)
ICT_maps
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Thanks!
commented 2025-10-24 12:36:58 UTC by ICT_maps ♦6
173558918
(Comments: 1)
mini-me
(Discussed changesets: 48)
Спасибо за помощь
commented 2025-10-24 12:36:54 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,152
154735406
(Comments: 6)
alinratna
(Discussed changesets: 6)
> not sure I fully understood what you meant

In my 29th and 30th changes is was still learning how to map things - "Is X better mapped as a Y or a Z": https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/26579848 . https://ww...
commented 2025-10-24 12:14:35 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485
166638523
(Comments: 1)
CRA666
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Zmiana wycofana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173714882

Nie został zmieniony obszar działalności, a budynek. Wcześniejsze dodanie nazwy na budynek było minimalną zmianą, ale nadal dobrą.
Poprawię na właściwszy spos&oac...
commented 2025-10-24 12:13:49 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267
172933019
(Comments: 2)
sashnikus_sashnikutus22229
(Discussed changesets: 19)
Wycofałem zestaw zmian. Przystanek jest fikcją, jak wiele innych, które tworzyłeś.
commented 2025-10-24 12:13:43 UTC by YomanNH ♦387
173714734
(Comments: 1)
Sylabowy Kot
(Discussed changesets: 102)
Budynku wojskowego.
commented 2025-10-24 12:09:06 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦267
173709173
(Comments: 4)
Nord Ambulanse2
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Thanks Marek-M.
commented 2025-10-24 12:06:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173709369
(Comments: 4)
Nord Ambulanse2
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Thanks Marek-M.
commented 2025-10-24 12:05:58 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,636
173709586
(Comments: 1)
FirePape
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hallo,

hier habe ich keine Anmerkung.

Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-24 11:40:19 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173709687
(Comments: 1)
FirePape
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen:

colour
Die Farben folgen der englischen Schreibweise, es müsste also „red“ sein.

description
Die Anzah...
commented 2025-10-24 11:39:09 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
173666011
(Comments: 1)
Coeur de Nacre
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bonjour Coeur de Nacre, bienvenue dans OSM et merci pour vos premières contributions qui concernent un très bel aménagement de l'interco. Pas simple de positionner correctement tout se petit monde sans imagerie! Je vous prop...
commented 2025-10-24 11:24:22 UTC by divaddivag ♦122
173681365
(Comments: 2)
Rafal G
(Discussed changesets: 5)
done
commented 2025-10-24 11:19:40 UTC by Rafal G ♦5
173648227
(Comments: 2)
TranslatorPS
(Discussed changesets: 25)
Hi, thanks, it means that the Japanese IME keyboard got wonky and I didn't spot that the last word of description got duplicated in the next line when editing. I've now also fixed w175558574 like in the other changeset you managed to commen...
commented 2025-10-24 11:16:54 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦38
171092286
(Comments: 1)
Elbloggers
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi, you added man_made=water_tap to a fountain which doesn’t have a tap. Please check the meaning of water tap, thank you.


commented 2025-10-24 11:14:22 UTC by dieterdreist ♦870
173643511
(Comments: 1)
TranslatorPS
(Discussed changesets: 25)
Hello (again)! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/175558574. What is the mean of the tag 下がるfrequency = 50?
commented 2025-10-24 11:11:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
22606780
(Comments: 1)
Zugführer_BAG
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Bij Medevoort 18 en 20 is het fout gegaan.
Kun je daar nog even naar kijken ?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.60752&lat=51.46737&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.74&overlays=long_ways...
commented 2025-10-24 11:09:21 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,397
173568627
(Comments: 1)
xugigi222
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2eg1. What is the mean of the tag
材质 = 防腐木板
?
commented 2025-10-24 11:04:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,206
173283405
(Comments: 2)
Richard Sell
(Discussed changesets: 1)
O mapeador ignora as mensagens enviadas e comentários abertos sobre sua edição, que introduz uma rua inexistente. Trata-se apenas de um caminho particular. A edição será revertida. Favor contatar a comunidade...
commented 2025-10-24 11:03:01 UTC by Tomio ♦27
173706316
(Comments: 2)
Tomek | Yanosik
(Discussed changesets: 101)
dzięki za wiadomość, dostaliśmy zgłoszenie o tym, że przejście jest zamknięte. Zweryfikuję raz jeszcze i dokonam edycji.
commented 2025-10-24 10:48:49 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦83
173659308
(Comments: 2)
Taurus3
(Discussed changesets: 26)
Hoi Wanderer, dankjewel ik houd er rekening mee. Groet, Taurus3
commented 2025-10-24 10:47:14 UTC by Taurus3 ♦7
173709226
(Comments: 3)
Map47
(Discussed changesets: 90)
grazie!
commented 2025-10-24 10:45:10 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦33
173705168
(Comments: 3)
JurajRiccany
(Discussed changesets: 8)
However, if you believe some of those are completely wrong or I have miss clicked somewhere, happy if those are corrected. No doubt.
commented 2025-10-24 10:41:04 UTC by JurajRiccany ♦1
173710607
(Comments: 2)
Circe xpst
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Basado en tus ediciones de mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he elaborado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Agregué barrera de seto"
(Auto-translation)
---
Based on your map edits in th...
commented 2025-10-24 10:37:15 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,132
173659437
(Comments: 3)
Bontemps1
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Pas besoin de Python ici !
Le plus simple sera que je te montre en live la semaine prochaine 😀
D'ici là, dis moi de quelle espèce il s'agit, et je l'ajoute si tu veux.
commented 2025-10-24 10:35:06 UTC by Sylvain M ♦60
173710792
(Comments: 1)
VMPanes
(Discussed changesets: 62)
[Mariveles, Bataan] Updates around FAB and Lakandula. Improved buildings and POIs.
commented 2025-10-24 10:34:32 UTC by VMPanes ♦21
168159118
(Comments: 1)
Sharky1337
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hallo,
bitte schaue mal nach den Ladestationen die du eingetragen hast. "socket:ccs" ist kein gültiger Steckertyp, siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket
commented 2025-10-24 10:26:39 UTC by mueschel ♦6,708
139000914
(Comments: 2)
wierci
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Dzieki za uwage! Faktycznie za blisko sciezki ja dalam i sie przypadkowo polaczyly.
Juz poprawione :)
commented 2025-10-24 10:25:27 UTC by wierci ♦5
173416855
(Comments: 1)
Erasmus Albatros
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Hi Erasmus, kannst du bitte mal prüfen, ob du versehentlich diesen Knoten verschoben hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3087470425/history#map=19/52.155918/11.412471&layers=N
commented 2025-10-24 10:23:22 UTC by AlexSpritze ♦22
171712187
(Comments: 1)
nathan_witmer
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About mapping and tagging highways.
A schort local connecting road between 2 other roads is never a secundary highway. At best an unclassified highway.
Check the wiki about tagging highways.

https://wiki.ope...
commented 2025-10-24 10:16:47 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
173682688
(Comments: 3)
GKremp
(Discussed changesets: 8)
Hallo,

nein, wir erfassen keine Daten für das Auslesen eines einzelnen Users. Du musst eine andere Lösung dafür finden. Z.B. im Wikipedia-Namen steht das (Bonn), damit würde ich arbeiten.

Viele Grüße
commented 2025-10-24 10:16:23 UTC by limes11 ♦962
172486440
(Comments: 4)
rskedgell
(Discussed changesets: 107)
This is the sort of thing where I really should write an OSM diary entry describing what I'm doing and why! When I start adding the actual restrictions, I'll write something.
commented 2025-10-24 10:14:27 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,645
171711418
(Comments: 1)
nathan_witmer
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while still selected.
Best regards and keep mapping
commented 2025-10-24 10:08:17 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
165691979
(Comments: 4)
Sharko_J
(Discussed changesets: 38)
The banner at the top of the Commons category informs people that there's copyright issues, deleting it would make this issue less clear to Commons contributors, so I doubt it will be deleted. But if it is it should be removed from this OSM feat...
commented 2025-10-24 09:58:59 UTC by spughetti ♦116
173707613
(Comments: 1)
NABILTR90
(Discussed changesets: 1)
الدكتور محمد نبيل الطرشان
commented 2025-10-24 09:39:36 UTC by NABILTR90 ♦1
170447696
(Comments: 1)
nov318
(Discussed changesets: 4)
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
Please keep these comments in mind when you adress next mapathlon.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in acc...
commented 2025-10-24 09:36:40 UTC by Frans S ♦9,954
173705296
(Comments: 3)
Anonymous36863
(Discussed changesets: 11)
Пардон, имала е таг building=apartments. А по отношение на тел. номера, "+" се слага пред "359" и след това има интервал.
commented 2025-10-24 09:32:33 UTC by Fraxi ♦169
173706943
(Comments: 1)
Komboj
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna....
commented 2025-10-24 09:30:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,740
173707080
(Comments: 1)
surveyor54
(Discussed changesets: 138)
CS-Kommentar: Ergänzungen Naturschutzgebiet

commented 2025-10-24 09:03:26 UTC by surveyor54 ♦659
170664900
(Comments: 1)
KennethMurray
(Discussed changesets: 4)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706418
where the changeset comment is:
Remove spam
commented 2025-10-24 08:44:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
172428490
(Comments: 10)
SWN-MP
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hallo,
interessant wäre die Fragestellung, wie der Router die Verbindung zum Straßengraphen herstellt. Über Objekte in OSM oder über eine Suche "nach dem nächsten Punkt auf einem highway".
Viel Erfolg, ich bi...
commented 2025-10-24 08:43:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,084
170664987
(Comments: 1)
KennethMurray
(Discussed changesets: 4)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706401
where the changeset comment is:
Remove spam
commented 2025-10-24 08:43:44 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
170665066
(Comments: 1)
KennethMurray
(Discussed changesets: 4)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706384
where the changeset comment is:
Remove spam
commented 2025-10-24 08:43:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173705280
(Comments: 4)
KennethMurray
(Discussed changesets: 4)
This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706360
where the changeset comment is:
Remove spam
commented 2025-10-24 08:42:44 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314
173662696
(Comments: 1)
TinPetreković
(Discussed changesets: 163)
Maxweight tag fixed in 173706193

Changed from maxweight:hgv:conditional to maxweigh:conditional

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173706193
commented 2025-10-24 08:39:27 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178
173654128
(Comments: 1)
TMomä
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Hei! En tunne tapausta kovin hyvin, mutta kerrottakoon ettei ole suositeltavaa poistaa OSM:stä teitä vain sen takia ettei niillä pääse kulkemaan. OSM pyrkii kuvaamaan maastona sellaisena kun se on. Siellä missä on t...
commented 2025-10-24 08:38:50 UTC by houtari ♦53
173577561
(Comments: 1)
TinPetreković
(Discussed changesets: 163)
Maxweight tag fixed in 173705667

Changed from maxweight:hgv:conditional to maxweigh:conditional

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173705667
commented 2025-10-24 08:24:49 UTC by TinPetreković ♦178
169755973
(Comments: 1)
Xiaomi HyperOS 12
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Пожалуйста не пишите КАПСОМ названия + устанавливайте тип кухни.

А лучше для редактирования карты используйте EveryDoor !

commented 2025-10-24 08:17:57 UTC by Константин Гам ♦740