| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 162288413 (Comments: 2) | geomaniX (Discussed changesets: 16) | Dann ist es wahrscheinlich abgerissen worden. Ich hatte bei den Gebäudeaktualisierungen häufiger den Fall, dass ich Gebäude eingezeichnet hatte die offensichtlich schon seit Jahren standen. Vielleicht war das so eins. Oder es ist ei... commented 2025-12-12 17:14:02 UTC by geomaniX ♦50 |
 | 175837638 (Comments: 1) | mircozorzo (Discussed changesets: 60) | Oltre all'eliminazione non chiara della board, ti segnalo che quei parcheggi non sono surface, ma street_side (ho già corretto) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175837... commented 2025-12-12 17:05:45 UTC by Mannivu ♦249 |
| 175852096 (Comments: 1) | DemolitionAlley (Discussed changesets: 8) | HUHU Du hast hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458093408 "buildinglevels=5" eingetragen. Macht aber eigentlich keinen Sinn, weil Du ja alle "buildingparts" mit Höhen versehen hast. Schöne Grü&szl... commented 2025-12-12 17:05:01 UTC by redrace ♦165 |
| 175837464 (Comments: 1) | mircozorzo (Discussed changesets: 60) | Ciao, perché hai eliminato questa Board e quella nel Cs 175837638? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175837464 commented 2025-12-12 17:03:50 UTC by Mannivu ♦249 |
| 173289511 (Comments: 3) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 79) | Hei, Danke! Meine Erfahrung ist, das sowas recht stabil. ist. Es gibt ja nur wenige, die intensiv sowas bearbeiten. Grüße aus dem Spreewald, Sven commented 2025-12-12 17:02:54 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,107 |
 | 175842468 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 312) | Skąd wynika wspólne poprowadzenie DK9 z DK74 od węzła Opatów do łącznika północnego? W terenie oznakowanie nie wskazuje by takie coś miało miejsce. commented 2025-12-12 16:57:07 UTC by Szymson ♦449 |
 | 175379463 (Comments: 3) | Carkedykus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Beste Carkedykus, Excuses voor het moeten terugdraaien van de wijzigingen. Dit doe ik liever niet. Hoewel vlakken plakken aan wegen niet per definitie fout is, levert dit dusdanig problemen op met het later wijzigen van ofwel de wegen ofwel de... commented 2025-12-12 16:56:36 UTC by Tjuro ♦239 |
 | 174523134 (Comments: 1) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 203) | What's your source for this unnamed, 680 MuM peak? Because it does not actually exist on the ground, the highpoint on the Zurichberg is nearby and is measured officially at 676. commented 2025-12-12 16:54:58 UTC by eultra ♦15 |
 | 175811405 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 9) | Segments that were unnecessarily split have been merged back together and tagged accordingly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175855038 commented 2025-12-12 16:51:18 UTC by TinPetreković ♦196 |
| 175667310 (Comments: 1) | Anna Marvin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I converted the node you added into an area and labeled it as grass. That should help it show up on the map. I notice that you removed the house number though, if the lawn actually has an address you can add the house number back. commented 2025-12-12 16:46:08 UTC by jm428 ♦23 |
 | 175845683 (Comments: 1) | naattkay (Discussed changesets: 2) | > warnings:crossing_ways:building-building Даже редактор iD выдает предупреждение, что в этом пакете правок ошибка - нарисованы дома поверх уже существ... commented 2025-12-12 16:40:01 UTC by fndoder ♦105 |
 | 175670146 (Comments: 4) | ffmp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry for delay. 1. I think it's bad idea to wait for support from ALL renderers. This is quite old well known feature of OSM, so we can expect support from mature renderers. 2. I don't know, how and why osm.org fill names of obje... commented 2025-12-12 16:32:22 UTC by ffmp ♦9 |
| 175607406 (Comments: 2) | osmcrsdrv (Discussed changesets: 4) | Mounted on a light fixture commented 2025-12-12 16:20:59 UTC by osmcrsdrv ♦2 |
| 175607290 (Comments: 2) | osmcrsdrv (Discussed changesets: 4) | The satellite map and the transit map are not overlayed properly, The map that I used was the transit map. commented 2025-12-12 16:19:56 UTC by osmcrsdrv ♦2 |
| 175460176 (Comments: 2) | WarrenJWells (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, @oba510, thanks for calling this out. We'll use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Bike_Streets as the organized editing page for everyone involved in our organization from this point forward. Apologies for not... commented 2025-12-12 16:19:22 UTC by varnish-WIDELY-downy ♦1 |
 | 175228921 (Comments: 2) | Niken PMI (Discussed changesets: 5) | Check this webpage to see the changes I had to make. Best regards https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175852239 commented 2025-12-12 16:18:36 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175837001 (Comments: 1) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 18) | Actually using your eyes to look where the culvert is instead of blindly accepting id's suggestion is highly recommended. You're a professional mapper, please act accordingly. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2025-12-12 16:17:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
 | 174389750 (Comments: 1) | Wikiscout (Discussed changesets: 3) | Servus, kanns sein, dass du dich beim Radweg im Tunnel beim LKH ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582856092 ) vertan hast? Weil der Radweg ist niemals 2 Meter breit :D commented 2025-12-12 16:12:47 UTC by Negreheb ♦307 |
 | 175786417 (Comments: 3) | STBuilder (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you please clarify the above question since you are continuing to edit, but have not replied yet. commented 2025-12-12 16:11:53 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175850982 (Comments: 1) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175853524 Poprzednio było prawidłowo (sam dopasowywałem kategorie dróg na podstawie map objazdów). Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-12 16:09:51 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175818925 (Comments: 5) | timax-osm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja, die Karte hatte ich auch, Hausnummer 7a gibt's offiziell nicht, trifft es aber recht gut, finde ich. commented 2025-12-12 16:03:57 UTC by timax-osm ♦1 |
| 175851063 (Comments: 1) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175853327 Poprzedni status był prawidłowy. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-12 16:03:46 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175851133 (Comments: 1) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175853294 Poprzedni status był prawidłowy. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-12 16:02:23 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175851188 (Comments: 1) | Papaj1000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175853257 Poprzedni status był prawidłowy. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-12 16:01:20 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175839979 (Comments: 3) | stefan2004 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Om import gevraagd via het forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/4039 Zodra de post in bedrijf is voeg je toe emergency=ambulance_station Op een adresnode zal het helaas niet renderen. Het kan i... commented 2025-12-12 16:00:34 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
 | 175324195 (Comments: 2) | melme110 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Block given: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19160 Please read and respond to the changeset discussion Dennis Raylin Chen Data Working Group commented 2025-12-12 15:59:00 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,539 |
| 175832359 (Comments: 1) | biketeur (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hast du die ganzen Gebäude in den Kleingärten vor Ort geprüft und eingetragen? Wenn nicht empfehle ich dir einmal JOSM auszuprobieren, da du dort alle diese Gebäude mit Overpass-Turbo laden kannst, und alles auf einmal mit wenigen... commented 2025-12-12 15:31:31 UTC by Tatfahren ♦301 |
 | 175833445 (Comments: 5) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 70) | Have a look at what values are most often used for that tag here https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cuisine#values Also consider https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features (if the food... commented 2025-12-12 15:29:33 UTC by rhhs ♦168 |
 | 172906500 (Comments: 1) | Aka_Bob (Discussed changesets: 20) | Видимо стоит в блокноте ставить напоминалку ))) commented 2025-12-12 15:23:46 UTC by FUZZY_42 ♦23 |
 | 175807228 (Comments: 1) | Aud154898 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Et merci pour cette première contribution. Je ne cartographie pas souvent les trottoirs, mais je pense que le tag utilisé (sidewalk:right:kerb=no) ne permet pas vraiment de savoir s'il y a un trottoir ou non. Il dit jus... commented 2025-12-12 15:22:41 UTC by r2d ♦36 |
| 175846302 (Comments: 1) | EsthersGeo (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello, EstherGeo. Long time ago I saw mappins from you. Still busy, I see. How are you ? See you next mapping. commented 2025-12-12 15:18:10 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175810227 (Comments: 1) | fmc_10 (Discussed changesets: 4) | FYI I re-added the traffic_mode:right=foot https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175850673#map=19/52.514637/13.466790 and others. Lets re check that this becomes a "Getrennter Geh-Radweg", also for the segment on the west with the ... commented 2025-12-12 15:03:14 UTC by tordans ♦429 |
| 175727480 (Comments: 3) | dcenkuwibeks (Discussed changesets: 3) | Korrigiert wurde es von User se7q38 :) commented 2025-12-12 15:02:32 UTC by kadiwa ♦52 |
 | 175819598 (Comments: 1) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Rather completely mapped. Please square all your rectangular buildings with the Q key while selected. When you draw a rectangle by hand, it is mostly not exactly square, however difficult to see. In JOSM (used by v... commented 2025-12-12 15:01:00 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
 | 163869489 (Comments: 1) | rlestevez (Discussed changesets: 2) | Source: https://carto.arba.gov.ar/cartoArba/ commented 2025-12-12 15:00:34 UTC by rlestevez ♦1 |
| 175810480 (Comments: 1) | fmc_10 (Discussed changesets: 4) | FYI we needed the traffic_mode:right=foot here Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175850533 Category: https://tilda-geo.de/regionen/radinfra?map=19/52.51364/13.47424&config=1v92rco.7h3d.4pt3i8&v=2&f=10|way/141... commented 2025-12-12 14:55:36 UTC by tordans ♦429 |
| 175710777 (Comments: 7) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Чудя се защо има лост за тупане на килими при Училището, там явно дори няма и килими. commented 2025-12-12 14:52:19 UTC by Anonymous36863 ♦17 |
| 175842082 (Comments: 5) | Dirk D'Agostino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich habe beide Einrichtungen als separate Nodes erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175849851. Grundsätzlich gilt: Befinden sich mehrere Einrichtungen in einem Gebäude, sollten diese als Nodes erfasst werden. Bitte nicht ei... commented 2025-12-12 14:51:02 UTC by aixbrick ♦879 |
| 175811109 (Comments: 1) | fmc_10 (Discussed changesets: 4) | FYI I change cycleway:SIDE=crossing to cycleway:SIDE=lane https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175850275 commented 2025-12-12 14:50:46 UTC by tordans ♦429 |
| 175647411 (Comments: 1) | Ev1dence (Discussed changesets: 77) | These tiny waterways are definitely not rivers. Please don't change minor waterways to such high classifications. Rivers are major waterways, for example you could normally drive a boat there, you cannot cross without a major bridge, etc., not t... commented 2025-12-12 14:48:17 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175812963 (Comments: 1) | fmc_10 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please double check this one. I think the traffic_mode:right=foot is right. But it also needs "segregated=yes" to signal that this is in "Seitenraum" --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-12-12 14:42:30 UTC by tordans ♦429 |
| 175792948 (Comments: 3) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 189) | Ich habe weiter recherchiert. Geh mal zu node 2142838616/node 8664659657 (Glombitza-Bank) und lass dir den AP2.5-Layer anzeigen. Was fällt auf? Die Borheckstraße ist im AP eine Linie die ca. 20px dicke pastellgelb mit 6px dick grauem Casin... commented 2025-12-12 14:38:49 UTC by jengelh ♦126 |
 | 147120069 (Comments: 1) | sarma b (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure that here in the wilderness we have some ATMs? commented 2025-12-12 14:35:33 UTC by hybridOL ♦35 |
| 175562393 (Comments: 1) | Tjuro (Discussed changesets: 45) | Mag ik vragen waarom dit is reverted? commented 2025-12-12 14:29:36 UTC by Carkedykus ♦3 |
| 175763216 (Comments: 1) | Swax000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | #mapbox_editing Geometry was fixed according to Bing Maps Aerial --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175763216 commented 2025-12-12 14:28:22 UTC by Swax000 ♦3 |
 | 175848583 (Comments: 1) | mlacourplaza@vauban (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 304 of your last 329 changes were deletions. This is quite... commented 2025-12-12 14:26:11 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,520 |
 | 175317249 (Comments: 1) | Swax000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | #mapbox_editing Fixed dragged node according to Bing Maps Aerial --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175317249 commented 2025-12-12 14:24:23 UTC by Swax000 ♦3 |
 | 175745372 (Comments: 3) | Daemon Targaryen (Discussed changesets: 19) | ok, si se está mejorando puede ser que cambie el status. Dejémoslo así mientras. saludos commented 2025-12-12 14:15:58 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175752936 (Comments: 3) | Manek-40 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Powinieneś to zgłosić do twórców OSRM commented 2025-12-12 14:15:03 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦827 |
| 159412076 (Comments: 1) | Aloade (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour. Sur la gare routière de Meaux vous avez remplacé des quais. La bonne pratique d'OSM est de les modifier afin de conserver leur historique (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Garder_l'histor... commented 2025-12-12 14:13:43 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,172 |
| 174719283 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM6 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Спасибо! commented 2025-12-12 14:09:23 UTC by Ozon OSM6 ♦3 |
| 175829726 (Comments: 1) | BenjaMuz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. por favor escribir las palabras completas. Las contracciones no tienen mucho sentido en un medio digital (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names) Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-12-12 13:57:29 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175829940 (Comments: 1) | BenjaMuz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Los semáforos se ponen en el lugar de detenciónd e los vehículos. Sabemos que la mayoría de los semáforos en Chile están mapeados erróneamente, pero lo estamos solucionando. Fue corregido. ... commented 2025-12-12 13:52:48 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175830292 (Comments: 1) | BenjaMuz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Las señales del tránsito, cuando están en vías bidireccionales, tienen que ser complementadas con un direction=forward/backward. Ya fueron corregidos. Saludos --- ... commented 2025-12-12 13:48:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175722002 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 9) | Segments that were split in have been merged back together and tagged with restrictions according to posted signs in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175847225 commented 2025-12-12 13:46:24 UTC by TinPetreković ♦196 |
| 175712938 (Comments: 1) | mikki65 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Ho fatto revert perche' i parcheggi erano gia' segnalati sulle highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175847264 commented 2025-12-12 13:45:38 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 174213480 (Comments: 4) | Skywaltuh (Discussed changesets: 35) | Skamieniałych wulkanów nie mapujemy jak aktywnych, bo 1. wprowadza to w błąd odbiorcę danych m.in. mamy prężnie działający dział gospodarki o nazwie turystyka wulkaniczna polegająca na odwiedzaniu aktywnych/czynnych wulkanów, ... commented 2025-12-12 13:45:24 UTC by Aim311_ ♦135 |
| 175751584 (Comments: 2) | Negjana (Discussed changesets: 71) | Die 200 km/h sind falsch, so lange ETCS nicht in Betrieb ist auf der Strecke. Und die Inbetriebnahme ist derzeit nicht absehbar. commented 2025-12-12 13:39:34 UTC by Negjana ♦32 |
| 175714091 (Comments: 1) | mikki65 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Ho fatto revert perche' i parcheggi erano gia' segnalati sulle highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175846861 commented 2025-12-12 13:37:32 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
 | 57798152 (Comments: 3) | jaakl (Discussed changesets: 7) | Rahvuspark on ikka enamvähem sama, neid Vilsandi nimelisi alu on seal ikka mitmeid :( https://register.keskkonnaportaal.ee/register/internationally-important-area/8957850 commented 2025-12-12 13:37:02 UTC by jaakl ♦8 |
 | 175797220 (Comments: 2) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 1) | תודה לך סליחה אני פעם הראשונה עשיתי משהו צריך זמן ללמוד commented 2025-12-12 13:27:14 UTC by dima monsky ♦1 |
 | 148854816 (Comments: 1) | 8err (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dobrý den. Děkuji za příspěvky do mapy. Avšak, chtěl bych vás poprosit o nevyplňování políčka name= v případech kdy se nejedna o vlastní jméno. Zapisujete tam popisky kter&e... commented 2025-12-12 13:26:07 UTC by martin-kokos ♦43 |
| 175815544 (Comments: 1) | mikki65 (Discussed changesets: 71) | bicycle=yes? Ho qualche dubbio... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12213776642 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175815544 commented 2025-12-12 13:24:34 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 175189714 (Comments: 4) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 168) | Wygląda na to, że nie złamałem przepisów wjeżdżając na rondo. Aktualnie wjazd od Magnackiej wygląda jak na zdjęciu: https://ibb.co/B5PRphRZ commented 2025-12-12 13:23:13 UTC by Marek-M ♦977 |
| 171720036 (Comments: 4) | HuntBehind (Discussed changesets: 2) | Přidávám tedy ještě článek o tom, co patří do pole "obtěžování" :* https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obt%C4%9B%C5%BEov%C3%A1n%C3%AD commented 2025-12-12 13:17:28 UTC by HuntBehind ♦1 |
| 175830612 (Comments: 1) | BenjaMuz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Por favor usar nombres oficiales y no descriptivos (Strip center, retorno) Fueron corregidos. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2025-12-12 13:15:58 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175844917 (Comments: 1) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę. |
| 175828291 (Comments: 3) | NumisK (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour Numisk, Merci pour ton retour. Ce n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter ces attributs puisqu'en France, c'est le statut par défaut. En France, les véhicules motorisés (et donc les livraisons) ... commented 2025-12-12 13:05:34 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦197 |
 | 175826548 (Comments: 1) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 99) | Hi. "Plaza del Ejercito" is the name of the park, but not the name of the avenue. What source are you using? commented 2025-12-12 13:02:33 UTC by muralito ♦2,095 |
| 175673157 (Comments: 2) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ļoti līdzīgas ir arī daudzas citas izmaiņas, kur pievienotas ne-luksoforu pārejas. Es pieņemu, ka nepareizi izvēlēts redaktorā. Lūgums apskatīt vērtības https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing un redaktorā izvēlēties atbilst... commented 2025-12-12 12:59:40 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 174261116 (Comments: 1) | Sergejs Zikins (Discussed changesets: 8) | You removed some valid oneway tags from ways here like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846345814/history. Please be more careful. commented 2025-12-12 12:54:27 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175836312 (Comments: 1) | hakermatrix (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-12 12:52:26 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175835989 (Comments: 3) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-12 12:52:20 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175627166 (Comments: 1) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 24) | Šajā izmaiņā ir veloceļš nomainīts uz ietvi, kas šeit, cik zinu, nav pareizi. Vai te kaut kas ir mainījies vai arī kas bija domāts ar šo izmaiņu? commented 2025-12-12 12:52:17 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175828928 (Comments: 1) | RuvubuRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi. Why did you map like this? You can drive SW Avenida Sagitario and take Botavara... commented 2025-12-12 12:51:41 UTC by muralito ♦2,095 |
| 175835212 (Comments: 2) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 20) | ok commented 2025-12-12 12:50:18 UTC by Anonymous36863 ♦17 |
| 175829200 (Comments: 1) | RuvubuRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi. Please remind that car drivers are not the only users of the data. This segment was blocked for cars with guardrails, but pedestrian and bycicles can use it. commented 2025-12-12 12:48:20 UTC by muralito ♦2,095 |
| 175624848 (Comments: 1) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 24) | Dalot un zīmējot šādus lielus ceļus atsevišķi ir jāņem vērā, ka šeit ir autobusu maršruti, pagriezienu ierobežojumi, esošas ceļu un pāreju vērtības un citas nianes. Lielu ceļu, kā šeit ir ļot... commented 2025-12-12 12:47:42 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175836103 (Comments: 1) | TaklamakanDesert (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi. Please review this changeset. It's highway has been under construction to make it 2 lanes in each direction. commented 2025-12-12 12:33:51 UTC by muralito ♦2,095 |
 | 175790378 (Comments: 1) | TheMiner (Discussed changesets: 3) | I believe "amenity=plater" is supposed to be a "planter"? Anyway, they are not really amenities and are usually tagged as man_made=planter, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dplanter commented 2025-12-12 12:30:07 UTC by rjaksic ♦9 |
 | 148970391 (Comments: 2) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 92) | Oh, I believe i copy this from a postcode around. But now is fixed if I didn't forgot one. commented 2025-12-12 12:29:02 UTC by 5R-MFT ♦79 |
| 175816841 (Comments: 1) | STBuilder (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sveiki! Atzīmējot ēkas stāvu skaitu, jumta stāvus atzīmē atsevišķi ar roof:levels, kas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88494848 jau bija norādīts, un līdz ar to stāvu skaits bija pareizs. Vēl, gārāžu ēkai šeit v... commented 2025-12-12 12:27:34 UTC by Pilsetkartetajs ♦22 |
 | 175295024 (Comments: 2) | AustinAkaHadiRender (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sure the issue is a really a big beginner I need someone helping me adding also like teaching me atleast how to edit stuff more well My Second Reply So to fix this when writing any road name first I should write the name in Arabic up ... commented 2025-12-12 12:27:18 UTC by AustinAkaHadiRender ♦1 |
 | 175839568 (Comments: 1) | Soh3illl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, I had to revert your change for one of the crossings. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=731655736021627 Please make sure to study the situation carefully. As local mappers, we spend a lot of time tagging crossings, and it is fa... commented 2025-12-12 12:24:10 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 175836457 (Comments: 1) | Johann200104 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Rather accurately mapped. Please do not cluster buildings. Best regards commented 2025-12-12 12:21:20 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175673940 (Comments: 1) | Asais (Discussed changesets: 24) | Sveiki, Ar footway=sidewalk apzīmē tikai celiņus, kas ir gar brauktuvi un CSN izpratnē ir ietves ar īpašiem nosacījumiem. Parastus celiņus kā piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065908822 it īpaši ārpus ceļu i... commented 2025-12-12 12:19:49 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
 | 175836486 (Comments: 1) | Ninyte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fra wiki'en: 'Values should be entered in volts without the unit or thousand delimiter. For example, for a 15 kV line, the value should be voltage=15000, not "15 kV", nor "15,000"'. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2025-12-12 12:19:32 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,735 |
 | 76938365 (Comments: 1) | Walter_Grassroot (Discussed changesets: 65) | 您好，这个变更集中对宜兴碑刻博物馆的编辑有一些小问题： 虽然iD编辑器默认博物馆是建筑，但这个博物馆不是单体建筑，那么应该删除building=yes标签； name:zh键是用于填写中文名的... commented 2025-12-12 12:15:14 UTC by 真中あお ♦36 |
| 175695526 (Comments: 1) | Ev1dence (Discussed changesets: 77) | Why did you delete the platforms and ways here? What has changed here? Where is the boarding for Jaunkalsnava now? commented 2025-12-12 12:14:45 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 158807143 (Comments: 1) | martinusK (Discussed changesets: 11) | See protect_class tegelikult ei käi terve kaitseala kohta. Eestis on vastavad IUCN-i kategooriad määratud kaitsealade vöönditele. Siin nt: Rohusi skv – 1b, Rammu skv – 4, Koipsi skv – 5. Arvatavasti o... commented 2025-12-12 12:14:44 UTC by Pikse ♦220 |
| 175826651 (Comments: 1) | Fattah Buzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Could you provide the source for this change? Last time I surveyed it about two months ago, the road access you modified was indeed no-car access, although cars can physically get through in certain situations, for example, during events when... commented 2025-12-12 12:13:55 UTC by ivandhfr ♦2 |
| 175697064 (Comments: 1) | Ev1dence (Discussed changesets: 77) | You have double-drawn some ways here like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457068390 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457068392 . You deleted a road instead of reusing or correcting it https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804415110 . Afte... commented 2025-12-12 12:11:27 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 174000473 (Comments: 2) | Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (Discussed changesets: 5) | Not sure... In any case, there should be only ONE airport node, even if it is a joint use civil/military commented 2025-12-12 11:56:30 UTC by Jens Korth at airport-information dot com ♦4 |
 | 175314461 (Comments: 3) | Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (Discussed changesets: 5) | How to do this then properly? There should only be ONE airport. commented 2025-12-12 11:54:38 UTC by Jens Korth at airport-information dot com ♦4 |
| 175572341 (Comments: 2) | Soren Carson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should have their corners squared. Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-12 11:52:28 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
 | 175329354 (Comments: 3) | Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, sorry for the delay. In the official pilot ifnormation from NATS UK (eAIP) the runways are still listed ?! This is published a valid from 25 December (!) 2025 https://www.aurora.nats.co.uk/htmlAIP/Publications/2025-12-25-AIRAC/html/in... commented 2025-12-12 11:50:39 UTC by Jens Korth at airport-information dot com ♦4 |
| 175697091 (Comments: 1) | Ev1dence (Discussed changesets: 77) | Why did you delete this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500076230 ? It is clearly visible on aerial. Has something changed here? commented 2025-12-12 11:49:44 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175823409 (Comments: 2) | Julio Novoa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Another issue * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. The humanitarian teams use the size of the buildings to estimate the number of people living there. This helps them to work out ... commented 2025-12-12 11:49:23 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175290633 (Comments: 1) | Sergejs Zikins (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please double-check this edit - this was previously (and is still partly) mapped with directional speed limits. As mentioned previously, please check maxspeed:type values. What has changed here recently? commented 2025-12-12 11:44:08 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175753044 (Comments: 1) | Sergejs Zikins (Discussed changesets: 8) | Like the other changeset, what is your source for these speed limits? These are very specific values you added to what is non-public territory. So how did you acquire this data and where can it be verified? commented 2025-12-12 11:42:14 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175789057 (Comments: 1) | Sergejs Zikins (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, Can you please clarify where these speed limits are from? Is there a speed limit sign here or some other official restriction? Especially, where did you get the speed limit for a runway? commented 2025-12-12 11:40:33 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175197115 (Comments: 1) | pertile (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13336020996. What is the mean of the key ref:FU? If this is not a cross-country reference number, ref:AR:fu would be appropriate. commented 2025-12-12 11:33:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175814715 (Comments: 2) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 38) | it would be very nice if you could split changesets up into smaller ones commented 2025-12-12 11:30:46 UTC by Hendrik Helsper ♦2 |
| 122739986 (Comments: 1) | danprim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Старая станция канатной дороги и паровоз commented 2025-12-12 11:29:26 UTC by danprim ♦1 |
| 175805986 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | Nodes that were accidentally created have been removed in changeset 175842033 since they served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175842033 commented 2025-12-12 11:29:01 UTC by TinPetreković ♦196 |
| 175811342 (Comments: 1) | Ozgur Ozbek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped: * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings int... commented 2025-12-12 11:26:28 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175837764 (Comments: 1) | Johann200104 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Please do not cluster adjacent buildings and tag them as 1 building. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with th... commented 2025-12-12 11:16:28 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175834244 (Comments: 1) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 10) | こんにちは。 変更セットの地理的サイズですが、もう少し範囲を狭くしていただけないでしょうか？ ・Geographical size of changesets https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_ch... commented 2025-12-12 11:15:46 UTC by Mappin' Jack Flash ♦245 |
 | 175755220 (Comments: 1) | Guy Maurel KONAN (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13366796729 (one of one hundred thirty-one objects). What is the mean of the tags CODE_ADRES = 00214 ID = 142785 NOM_PADA = RUE ADJABIÉ LÉONIE YAYO PAYS = CÔTE D&#... commented 2025-12-12 11:15:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175811589 (Comments: 1) | NorthOfEnglandMaps (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welcome to OSM The train station's network & operator are correctly tagged and there's no need for a linear platform when the polygonal one exists. commented 2025-12-12 11:13:43 UTC by DaveF ♦1,591 |
| 175103938 (Comments: 1) | Catastro Goya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Buen día! estoy realizando algunas correcciones alrededor de las calles República del Líbano y Agustín Pedro Justo, porque les faltaban acentos o nombres abreviados. Y quería comentarles un problema con el agregado ... commented 2025-12-12 11:13:10 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦130 |
| 175839052 (Comments: 1) | MugerwaHukasha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not cluster buildings and square each rectangular building. Don't you use the building plugin? This helps you to map nice rectangular buildings. Check this webpage please https://learnosm.org/e... commented 2025-12-12 11:11:07 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175763425 (Comments: 1) | Paul_H 82122 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13367266246. What is the mean of the tag *conditional=*\t= "Arret de Car" (translation: car stop)? Is there a traffic sign, or is this just an excuse? commented 2025-12-12 11:08:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175839401 (Comments: 5) | Tjaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Tjaster.. Je kunt evt een terugmelding doen naar het kadaster anders worden mutaties die je zelf doet weer overschreven. Het gebouw heb ik weer uitgelijnd mbv de BGT. Het lijkt dan verkeerd.. maar klopt precies. Mvg.. eggie commented 2025-12-12 11:07:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175840411 (Comments: 2) | Mathies de Groot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dit is wat je allemaal verwijderd hebt. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175840411 Daar zijn we niet blij mee. Je edits zijn teruggedraaid. Dit wordt gezien als vernieling van de kaart. Als je een festivalterrein wilt mappen doe... commented 2025-12-12 10:58:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175643783 (Comments: 1) | wandelzot (Discussed changesets: 4) | iD editor doet het niet goed op dat vlak, maar volgens de wiki moet je Quercus met een hoofdletter schrijven https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=NL:Tag:genus%3DQuercus#Fouten_bij_het_labelen commented 2025-12-12 10:57:32 UTC by Joske1020 ♦18 |
| 175824720 (Comments: 1) | Jesse Joe (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-12-12 10:51:02 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 168126645 (Comments: 1) | martinusK (Discussed changesets: 11) | Siin on Lubja klindiastangu MKA-st välja jäänud väiksem lahustükk teisel pool Lubja teed. commented 2025-12-12 10:48:23 UTC by Pikse ♦220 |
| 175839576 (Comments: 1) | stefan2004 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-12 10:46:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175839674 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 17) | i moved it back because the 10 million dollar remodel was supposed to be done by now. commented 2025-12-12 10:42:19 UTC by ieguy3 ♦17 |
| 175840087 (Comments: 1) | Marc Olzheim (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bloom zit tussen nummer 7 en 9 in, maar heeft zelf geen huisnummer. Klopt het hoe ik het nu gedaan heb? commented 2025-12-12 10:41:06 UTC by Marc Olzheim ♦3 |
| 175838596 (Comments: 1) | mircozorzo (Discussed changesets: 60) | perché hai cambiato anche i punti che erano support=wall_mounted in pole? commented 2025-12-12 10:40:01 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦34 |
| 174132443 (Comments: 2) | oliviar_grab (Discussed changesets: 6) | Also see discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/planned-edit-to-re-tag-descriptive-names-in-road-route-relations-in-the-united-states/108454 commented 2025-12-12 10:37:30 UTC by ZLima12 ♦286 |
| 161150085 (Comments: 4) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 35) | ok commented 2025-12-12 10:34:07 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦145 |
| 162386653 (Comments: 2) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 35) | k thanks commented 2025-12-12 10:33:19 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦145 |
| 175700345 (Comments: 6) | Eleutherio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks, I'll definitely be more careful in the future. Still looking for the right tool for mobile editing. Happy mapping! commented 2025-12-12 10:28:23 UTC by Eleutherio ♦1 |
| 175816409 (Comments: 1) | murmeldin (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo murmeldin, es gibt Standard-access-Werte die nicht gesetzt werden müssen. Dazu gehört bicycle/foot/horse und motor_vehicle auf Straßenhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany ... commented 2025-12-12 10:27:14 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,453 |
| 175839033 (Comments: 2) | Mathies de Groot (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #175839451 commented 2025-12-12 10:24:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175557285 (Comments: 1) | ramonz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Revertido parcialmente: ninguno de los elementos place tiene una población suficiente para ser village, que es de 1000hab. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175839452 commented 2025-12-12 10:23:02 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦232 |
| 175805343 (Comments: 2) | ErieCanal (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello rhss, Thank you for your insight, I will defer to your knowledge on this. commented 2025-12-12 10:12:01 UTC by ErieCanal ♦4 |
 | 175791540 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 79) | 1. > The government websites include "Yau Ma Tei" https://www.info.gov.hk/tb_chest/tb-chi/contents/c614_1July2007.htm https://www.dh.gov.hk/english/tele/tele_chc/tele_chc_shcf.html https://www.dh.gov.hk/english/tele/tele_chc/tele_chc_shc... commented 2025-12-12 10:08:34 UTC by kingkingHK ♦41 |
| 174998512 (Comments: 1) | Vojtěch Fošnár (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You add the tag ref:lidl_cz. Wouldn't ref:CZ:lidl be the correct notation? commented 2025-12-12 10:07:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175797088 (Comments: 2) | xcazin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci, mais je n'en n'ai vu qu'un seul restant : Chemin 1149398592 commented 2025-12-12 10:06:18 UTC by xcazin ♦2 |
 | 175832483 (Comments: 1) | slautenb (Discussed changesets: 8) | These are not quarries, but wellsites for gas extraction. I have changed them accordingly. commented 2025-12-12 10:05:40 UTC by topius ♦59 |
| 10389516 (Comments: 2) | Walter Schlögl (Discussed changesets: 69) | The original tag was given by looniverse, so I'm not able to decide, what's correct. Also Nachtspazz has tagged some of the ways around with the same tag. commented 2025-12-12 10:05:12 UTC by Walter Schlögl ♦29 |
| 175805717 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 7) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 175838383 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175838383 commented 2025-12-12 10:04:21 UTC by TinPetreković ♦196 |
| 175372570 (Comments: 4) | josepgomila6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pots revertir els canvis amb eines com https://revert.monicz.dev/ Si necessites ajuda, pregunta o comenta-ho a la comunitat a https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca o a https://telegram.me/osmcat commented 2025-12-12 10:01:52 UTC by jmaspons ♦73 |
| 171663909 (Comments: 1) | Komon1946 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! What did you mean when you set the surface tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136521737 to "komadiri_walkside"? commented 2025-12-12 09:55:25 UTC by sosquqer ♦3 |
| 96135229 (Comments: 1) | UrSuS (Discussed changesets: 26) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/886644549 – nature reserve "Haapse rannamännik" is added here. There is no such nature reserve. I also can't find name "Haapse rannamännik" from elsewhere, and it is un... commented 2025-12-12 09:51:08 UTC by Pikse ♦220 |
| 175812684 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted maxheight applied to too long segment and related way splits made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175838129 #OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-12 09:50:52 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
 | 175826686 (Comments: 1) | BryanChen (Discussed changesets: 1) | 已經修正，加了新位置的點位 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175835494 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175826686 commented 2025-12-12 09:39:34 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,539 |
| 175810681 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted maxheight applied to too long segment and related way splits made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175837481 #OptimoRoute commented 2025-12-12 09:37:55 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 175073249 (Comments: 1) | cardboardBox (Discussed changesets: 2) | This address is in the middle of an intersection. Did you mean to add it elsewhere? commented 2025-12-12 09:32:43 UTC by democat ♦10 |
| 174759565 (Comments: 1) | 💙Severodonetsk💓 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao 💙Severodonetsk💓 I would add this as 'only' a car shop, as they mostly seem to sell these. What do you mean with 'The triangle is not valid'? Greetings, habi commented 2025-12-12 09:25:34 UTC by habi ♦1,981 |
| 175764573 (Comments: 6) | Matthieu HUGOT (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour Mathieu, C’est très bien de vouloir contribuer. Toutefois, il faut faire attention quand on débute à y aller doucement :). On peut facilement par erreur casser des choses. N&rsq... commented 2025-12-12 09:22:53 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦45 |
| 109334062 (Comments: 1) | Chris Kerr (Discussed changesets: 5) | This protected object (hoiuala) for the most part encompasses the sea are between Saaremaa and Muhu islands. So mapping it as an individual protected object at given location is quite misleading. I think the sign should be mapped and tagged mo... commented 2025-12-12 09:08:15 UTC by Pikse ♦220 |
| 175707333 (Comments: 2) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 38) | Thank you so much mcliquid! I'll follow the guidelines next time! commented 2025-12-12 09:01:10 UTC by Jobigutenburg ♦10 |
| 175792289 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 58) | its the old way of doing it. I have been around the block to long. commented 2025-12-12 08:57:21 UTC by Natfoot ♦59 |
| 175835194 (Comments: 2) | Marc Olzheim (Discussed changesets: 5) | typo anders rendert.. commented 2025-12-12 08:54:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175823575 (Comments: 1) | HockingCB93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/13276682729 (a tree) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! commented 2025-12-12 08:53:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 172648865 (Comments: 8) | MarcieLLo-KR (Discussed changesets: 3) | No i gitara spoko dziękuję ślicznie. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-12 08:53:01 UTC by MarcieLLo-KR ♦3 |
| 175737785 (Comments: 3) | Matthieu HUGOT (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merci, c’est mieux. commented 2025-12-12 08:51:45 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦45 |
| 173724012 (Comments: 2) | perlus5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aquí la ficha del lugar en la red natura 2000: https://biodiversity.europa.eu/sites/natura2000/ES2430077 Habría que añadir la fuente, la etiqueta boundary y definitivamente quitar lo de LIC o ZEPA y dejar solo "Bajo G&aac... commented 2025-12-12 08:47:09 UTC by msevilla00 ♦139 |
| 175828174 (Comments: 1) | MasoudNasratzada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between leisure=park and leisure=pitch! Please see our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org commented 2025-12-12 08:45:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175834683 (Comments: 1) | Hyperfornoza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please remember that an address must consist of at least a house number and street name (additional information such as city, country and state can be calculated using the available boundary data). commented 2025-12-12 08:41:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175834670 (Comments: 3) | akaryan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi.. Het heeft te maken met moped en mofa. Die ziet OSM als motorvoertuigen. Op een G13 mag je dan wel weer met een elektro mofa of mofa met uitgeschakelde motor. auto's en motoren zullen per default niet routeren. Mapse, eggie<... commented 2025-12-12 08:41:30 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175835069 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-12 08:41:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175670697 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 9) | The newly created node was removed in changeset 175835318 along with the tags that overstepped the boundaries set by posted signs. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175835318 commented 2025-12-12 08:38:28 UTC by TinPetreković ♦196 |
| 175832660 (Comments: 1) | Paul Schoonhoven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-12 08:31:18 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175833900 (Comments: 3) | Marc Olzheim (Discussed changesets: 5) | Top! commented 2025-12-12 08:30:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175794878 (Comments: 4) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Вярно е, че има примери като катедралата във Варна - https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/43.205210/27.909919. ам 3D ефектът е много добър. Но не е това целта на OSM. Ра... commented 2025-12-12 08:26:22 UTC by Fraxi ♦198 |
| 175833601 (Comments: 1) | Hans_Bak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Hans... Er hoort geen adres op een laadpaal. Adres heb ik verwijderd. Wel kun je andere eigenschappen toevoegen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station MVG eggie commented 2025-12-12 08:25:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175831183 (Comments: 2) | n-dal-fixes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Done, thanks! commented 2025-12-12 08:25:40 UTC by n-dal-fixes ♦1 |
| 175791744 (Comments: 4) | KBadi (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175834733 where the comment is: "Reverted data due to lack of response from the original contributor" commented 2025-12-12 08:24:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
 | 175818043 (Comments: 2) | Grupo Bultron (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175834699 where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change" commented 2025-12-12 08:20:54 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 174606091 (Comments: 1) | Sahar Shadi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you added Amore Pizzeria with this change. Someone else has create a note now, saying that this place has not been open in months. Is that correct? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083744 commented 2025-12-12 08:11:38 UTC by cuzi ♦138 |
| 175821246 (Comments: 1) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 125) | Благодаря, че си върнал таговете! В iD редактора ми е трудно да намеря https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457893588. В JOSM ще е по-лесно. commented 2025-12-12 08:10:44 UTC by Fraxi ♦198 |
| 173073466 (Comments: 1) | 近江商人 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:名称#name_は名称だけ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:ライフサイクルの接頭辞 commented 2025-12-12 08:09:21 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦34 |
| 174936146 (Comments: 2) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 189) | Danke für den Hinweis. Da habe ich mich in JOSM wohl verklickt und statt die bestehende Relation zu bearbeiten ein Duplikat erzeugt. Habe ich soeben korrigiert. commented 2025-12-12 08:08:29 UTC by Ropino ♦395 |
| 175833562 (Comments: 1) | MortenME (Discussed changesets: 1) | 'sport centre' er den korrekte betegnelse: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre commented 2025-12-12 08:02:46 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,735 |
| 175833881 (Comments: 1) | YomanNH (Discussed changesets: 55) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/15058341... commented 2025-12-12 08:01:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175667131 (Comments: 2) | nikoseag (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai remodifié les derniers éléments. J'ai rajouté les arbres. commented 2025-12-12 08:01:02 UTC by nikoseag ♦1 |
 | 175829824 (Comments: 4) | GrabVN_QThoai (Discussed changesets: 20) | Nếu bạn không sửa lại tình trạng đường về đúng thực tế hiện tại, tối tôi sẽ sửa lại nhé commented 2025-12-12 07:59:03 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦27 |
| 175723168 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 11) | The tag that was accidentally added on the node has been removed from it in changeset 175833897 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175833897 commented 2025-12-12 07:58:16 UTC by TinPetreković ♦196 |
| 175809463 (Comments: 3) | Olivier Faber (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep.. ik keek in eerste instantie met de foutenanalyse. Je hebt het later aangevuld. Prima dus. Mapse.. eggie commented 2025-12-12 07:56:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175810294 (Comments: 2) | Olivier Faber (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-12 07:48:11 UTC by Olivier Faber ♦2 |
| 175796693 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 7) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 175806725 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175806725 commented 2025-12-12 07:43:48 UTC by TinPetreković ♦196 |
| 175806725 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 7) | Removing the node that was accidentally created in changeset 175796693, since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175796693 commented 2025-12-12 07:42:54 UTC by TinPetreković ♦196 |
| 175431512 (Comments: 7) | xokYBsoFxH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo tjum, Würde mich freuen, wenn du da mithilfst :-) Anfangs hatte ich noch stets die Straße zerstückelt, selbst wenn sich das Straßenparken auf einem Abschnitt ständig geändert hat. Mittlerweile bin ich d... commented 2025-12-12 07:38:35 UTC by Metzor ♦395 |
| 175811062 (Comments: 5) | pandamahoniowa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Super, dzięki! commented 2025-12-12 07:20:24 UTC by YomanNH ♦419 |
 | 175782179 (Comments: 1) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, Again you are duplicating highways which will disrupt routing. Way: 6 (1457648079) is a duplication of several existing highway, I've removed it. You should have been alerted to the problem by the warnings given above. Regards ... commented 2025-12-12 07:19:03 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 169327526 (Comments: 1) | okadatsuneo (Discussed changesets: 21) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:名称#name_は名称だけ commented 2025-12-12 07:15:01 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦34 |
| 175712627 (Comments: 1) | Sandonin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Pour les lignes de bus, la valeur de l'attribut "network" est "FR:TUB" et non "TUB" cf configuration de l'outil PTNA: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saint-Brieuc/Transports_en_commun/PTNA/Ligne... commented 2025-12-12 07:11:56 UTC by mga_geo ♦278 |
| 166460373 (Comments: 1) | ちゃわんむし (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:名称#name_は名称だけ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:ライフサイクルの接頭辞 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:shop=vacant commented 2025-12-12 07:10:57 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦34 |
| 170416377 (Comments: 1) | Ryo-a (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:名称#name_は名称だけ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:demolished:building commented 2025-12-12 07:06:24 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦34 |
| 143133484 (Comments: 4) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 41) | Poprosiłem innego użytkownika, który edytował drogi na terenie kombinatu, sprawdził nazwy dróg i poprawił nazwy. Usunąłem jeszcze nieaktualne fixme z jednego fragmentu. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132908314 commented 2025-12-12 07:05:58 UTC by YomanNH ♦419 |
| 132908314 (Comments: 5) | sp9wun (Discussed changesets: 6) | Też się zastanawiałem, czy jest sens dodawać takie nazwy, skoro ciężko to zweryfikować. Ale skoro miałeś gdzie sprawdzić te nazwy, to wielkie dzięki za poprawkę :) commented 2025-12-12 07:04:07 UTC by YomanNH ♦419 |
 | 111231085 (Comments: 1) | Clinton Mercieca (Discussed changesets: 11) | can you clarify the source of this village? I see no info online about any "Minden" being there commented 2025-12-12 06:55:31 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
| 175830580 (Comments: 1) | SunnyMonster (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is proposed to be an urban road anyways source: https://www.fzlj.gov.cn/xjwz/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/xrmzfgzbm_11124/ljxgtzyj/gkml/ghjh_13309/202209/P020220921643529436290.pdf commented 2025-12-12 06:23:04 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦26 |
| 174865703 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Maybe this road should be tagged as a residential road rather than an unclassified road since it provides access to homes? commented 2025-12-12 06:18:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 174653353 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | I don't think roads within parking lots should be tagged as unclassified roads. Do you have any comments or input on that? commented 2025-12-12 06:12:02 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 138421494 (Comments: 2) | _torsten_ (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi Mateusz! I now also think that an empty key is better than an incorrect or unknown one. Please remove the tracktype. Thanks! commented 2025-12-12 06:11:04 UTC by _torsten_ ♦99 |
| 174647875 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Why is this road tagged as a residential road? It doesn't seem to serve any homes or residential areas. It just serves a farm. Maybe this road should be tagged as a service road? commented 2025-12-12 06:09:52 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175781758 (Comments: 1) | 44mpr (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19152 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175830507 commented 2025-12-12 06:09:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 174619042 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Or maybe the road connecting the parking lots should be tagged as a parking aisle? commented 2025-12-12 06:05:42 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
 | 175747118 (Comments: 3) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 244) | Thanks for the additional information about how layer tags work. So in this case we have roads that are below ground level, roads that are above them and also above ground level, and then roads outside of that area that are at ground level. Sa... commented 2025-12-12 05:54:54 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦62 |
| 172918476 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi TransAct-AS, I saw in this changeset that you removed the turn:lanes:both_ways=left tag from the Harper Avenue way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257032109). You also removed the way from the bus route relations that travel along Harper Avenue... commented 2025-12-12 05:48:45 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175829598 (Comments: 1) | BubbaJuice (Discussed changesets: 68) | Also some voltages here: https://ssvec.org/downloads/inserts/2018/August-2018-Special.pdf commented 2025-12-12 05:28:07 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦134 |
| 175790635 (Comments: 3) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 87) | All good, it happens! commented 2025-12-12 05:08:52 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,441 |
| 168856081 (Comments: 4) | jonathanpatt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Copy that. Sounds like a solid rationale. I checked the USGS LiDAR DEMs for the area and didn't see any trace of the Aspen Trail. For a route on a sidehill that's a pretty strong indicator there's not much of anything left to follow. commented 2025-12-12 04:56:24 UTC by John Hanover ♦17 |
| 168962277 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | What is the source for changing those service roads to unclassified roads? Those roads just serve a school. Maybe those roads seem too important to be unclassified roads? commented 2025-12-12 04:21:39 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 168962241 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Maybe those unclassified roads within the parking areas should be tagged as parking aisles? What do you think? commented 2025-12-12 04:18:15 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 168962061 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | I don't think those service roads should be tagged as unclassified roads since they just provide access to schools. Any comments or input on that? Thanks. commented 2025-12-12 04:15:37 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 168962030 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | I don't think this service road should be tagged as an unclassified road since this road just provides access to a school. Any comments or input on that? Thanks. commented 2025-12-12 04:14:13 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 168961916 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | What is the source for changing this service road to an unclassified road? Does this road seem overclassified? commented 2025-12-12 04:10:01 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 168093783 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Please don't abbreviate street names. Spell out the full street name per OSM conventions. This street name should be spelled out to West Harwell Drive. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations commented 2025-12-12 04:06:36 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 164422853 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | This section of US 64 is not a motorway. Please do not tag this section of highway as a motorway. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165870231 commented 2025-12-12 03:49:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 162393354 (Comments: 3) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello TransAct-AS, I noticed that you deleted Liberty Drive (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18666891) in this changeset. As far as I can tell, it is visible in 2019 Bing imagery, 2024 Esri imagery, and other aerial imageries, and I can clearly see... commented 2025-12-12 03:37:05 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175462379 (Comments: 15) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Only noticed this change now. +1 with Jarek. The Allen Road is a motorway. It was built as one, it is called an expressway identical to the rest of the expressways in Ontario, and the City of Toronto calls it an expressway. It is classified the same ... commented 2025-12-12 03:14:51 UTC by lastcommodore ♦14 |
| 175816025 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello TransAct-AS, what is the source for changing this driveway to an unclassified road? Does it seem too important to be classified as an unclassified road? commented 2025-12-12 03:04:08 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 39188001 (Comments: 1) | Adam_Piszczek (Discussed changesets: 203) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4173354690/history - co to jest tourism=terminal ? commented 2025-12-12 03:03:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175272266 (Comments: 7) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 247) | @jidanni I do not see a link to the thread you started on forum there @hlfan I have no opinion on the tagging here and as I usual jidanni thread is not really clear to me commented 2025-12-12 03:00:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175816043 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Why did you change this road to an unclassified road? Shouldn't this be a driveway since it looks to be a driveway as seen in the aerial imagery? Perhaps you overclassified this road, causing this disconnected unclassified road? commented 2025-12-12 02:58:09 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
 | 175825897 (Comments: 2) | 듬들이 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19159 commented 2025-12-12 02:46:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175806009 (Comments: 2) | Cris Moreno Silva (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sí, no pueden andar vehículos de 4 ruedas en ese sector. Es más bien para caminantes o lo usan motoristas en duro. commented 2025-12-12 02:46:40 UTC by Cris Moreno Silva ♦2 |
| 175806072 (Comments: 4) | Cris Moreno Silva (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok. entonces puede quitarse el nombre en ese caso. commented 2025-12-12 02:45:47 UTC by Cris Moreno Silva ♦2 |
| 175817859 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Why did you tag McCoy Avenue (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119541147) as an unclassified road? It was a residential road since it provides access to homes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential https://wiki.openstre... commented 2025-12-12 02:40:56 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
 | 130437130 (Comments: 1) | hmdgms (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124499053/history has shop = marble that was added in this edit shop=marble ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it selling marble slabs? Marble products? Is it maybe man_made=works, rather than actual ... commented 2025-12-12 02:39:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175826785 (Comments: 1) | Sheila Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is the Sunterra Lagoon, the construction finish earlier this year commented 2025-12-12 02:32:35 UTC by Sheila Nguyen ♦1 |
| 173351818 (Comments: 1) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 26) | Excellent. I just saw this had officially opened a few days ago in the news, glad to see someone has already mapped it :D commented 2025-12-12 02:29:17 UTC by 0235 ♦37 |
| 175826351 (Comments: 2) | MKT HPG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Restored the changes. Thanks! commented 2025-12-12 02:22:02 UTC by MKT HPG ♦1 |
| 175817702 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Why did you disconnect Way 124808806 from West Aztec Boulevard (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189121433)? Did the entrance to the service road from West Aztec Boulevard get closed or removed recently? Also, you changed a driveway into an unclassi... commented 2025-12-12 02:08:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175826199 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 570) | https://revert.osmz.ru/11898 wycofanie 175778158,175778128,175778087,175778045,175777962,175777911,175777875,175777840,175777405 commented 2025-12-12 01:46:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175826163 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 570) | https://revert.osmz.ru/11897 wycofanie 175795984 175795574 175795562 175795527 175795319 175778462 175778439 175778314 175778293 175778259 175778235 commented 2025-12-12 01:44:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175826121 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 570) | wycofanie 175796844,175796786,175796697,175796110 commented 2025-12-12 01:43:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175789138 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 244) | Thanks for fixing my mistakes. :) commented 2025-12-12 00:42:54 UTC by Seyruun ♦1 |
| 175781217 (Comments: 1) | Wariku (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175781217 commented 2025-12-12 00:38:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,651 |
| 87237470 (Comments: 2) | Radboss (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hallo George1201, wenn beides klar ersichtlich ist und sich Versickerungsbecken und Spielplatz überschneiden, spricht etwas dagegen dies dann auch direkt so als zwei überlappende Flächen einzutragen: landuse=basin und ein separates lei... commented 2025-12-12 00:17:51 UTC by Radboss ♦20 |
| 175774452 (Comments: 1) | Stephen CW (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: look for the pole's shadow for the exact location of the device. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175774452 commented 2025-12-12 00:17:16 UTC by Glassman ♦5,651 |
| 175819005 (Comments: 1) | Arek34 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 23:52:56 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175816116 (Comments: 1) | mark2525 (Discussed changesets: 100) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13370233202 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-12-11 23:52:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175739805 (Comments: 2) | Kirk Ireson (Discussed changesets: 1) | I live near here and are familiar with those pavements. Those which go into apartment and/or condo areas are all privately maintained (some are gated too), and thus fall under my definition of a driveway. The one at Holliday Water is unnamed and look... commented 2025-12-11 23:51:48 UTC by Kirk Ireson ♦1 |
| 175757503 (Comments: 13) | fpww (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, het was meer om ook bij te dragen aan deze map maar ik kom er wel achter. commented 2025-12-11 23:46:22 UTC by fpww ♦1 |
| 175779382 (Comments: 2) | jupiter56 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, si vous avez de meilleurs données je vous invite de corriger les miens. Non, il n'y a pas encore de nom officiel d'après mes connaissances. En plus la voie verte sera continué au delà du pont j... commented 2025-12-11 23:42:46 UTC by jupiter56 ♦1 |
| 175797852 (Comments: 1) | FJQZ4091 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, As a general rule "phone:AU" is really only for phone numbers that can only be called from Australia. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457750482 "03 9707 5144" can be called from overseas, so it should be ... commented 2025-12-11 23:41:28 UTC by TheSwavu ♦573 |
| 175819035 (Comments: 1) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 14) | Oops, thanks! commented 2025-12-11 23:24:12 UTC by gurglypipe ♦958 |
| 175798807 (Comments: 1) | brzęk (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-11 23:00:45 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175798764 (Comments: 1) | brzęk (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-11 23:00:39 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175634985 (Comments: 1) | LovenOutdoors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, LovenOutdoors! I noticed you changed and added some ref tags in northern Cyprus. Some examples include ref=İK.05 to ref=D925 around (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309612555), ref=D.55 to D 950 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005400399... commented 2025-12-11 22:48:10 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦20 |
| 175806959 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 22:43:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175802479 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 22:42:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175804333 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 22:42:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175800864 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 22:42:44 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175806303 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 22:42:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175805004 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 22:42:34 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175805896 (Comments: 1) | kubaban2 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 22:42:29 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175765727 (Comments: 1) | PJJvStrien (Discussed changesets: 24) | De afsluiting was al verwerkt in Openstreetmap. In deze wijziging worden ook nog eens alle bouwwegen en de geplande toerit voor hulpdiensten verwijderd. Ik zal de wijziging terugdraaien. commented 2025-12-11 22:42:27 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,030 |
| 175808825 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 22:42:26 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175817149 (Comments: 2) | bkleipool (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ohja ik zie het, aangepast! commented 2025-12-11 22:37:49 UTC by bkleipool ♦2 |
 | 175725928 (Comments: 11) | Banglow (Discussed changesets: 7) | If you're a local user then how come from your history you're editing in the whole world, Papua New Guinea, South America, Egypt, India, Ghana, and Morocco at the same time... https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Banglow/history commented 2025-12-11 22:29:29 UTC by ilias_ ♦385 |
| 167830721 (Comments: 1) | LievenL (Discussed changesets: 5) | let op de straatnaam was fout sprietstraat => Zeswegestraat commented 2025-12-11 22:23:03 UTC by kabelhaai ♦73 |
 | 175782133 (Comments: 2) | mimi arissa (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175822067 where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change" commented 2025-12-11 22:04:00 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 175783685 (Comments: 3) | FATIN NUR HANNAH (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175822039 where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change" commented 2025-12-11 22:03:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 175344622 (Comments: 1) | Svilenov (Discussed changesets: 7) | Линиите за алеи и тротоари представляват центъра на алеята. В този ред на мисли, границата на парка, тревните и залесените площи не е цент... commented 2025-12-11 22:02:24 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦754 |
| 175789216 (Comments: 2) | シゲシゲ (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175822006 where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change" commented 2025-12-11 22:02:09 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
 | 175800158 (Comments: 2) | مطب زنان ومامایی (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175821993 where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change" commented 2025-12-11 22:01:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 175782712 (Comments: 3) | ANNISAK ASRAF (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok commented 2025-12-11 21:59:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175777348 (Comments: 3) | Casper_cc87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ok commented 2025-12-11 21:59:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175655648 (Comments: 3) | Emanuele Lorenzo Corti (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ciao, non penso sia il caso di revertare, ma secondo me se usi la funzione merge(C) di iD per unire le way almeno una delle due si preserva, senza che entrambe vengano cancellate. In questo modo non avresti neanche dovuto rifare tutti gli incroci.... commented 2025-12-11 21:51:40 UTC by AwFi ♦42 |
| 175766995 (Comments: 2) | Vicolapatat (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, merci en effet je dois être plus précis. commented 2025-12-11 21:47:46 UTC by Vicolapatat ♦1 |
| 175261684 (Comments: 1) | IgnisAlienus (Discussed changesets: 1) | I do believe Alligator Creek is actually a river in OSM definitions - it is wider than 3m. Refer to the wiki for river and stream: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driver vs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream commented 2025-12-11 21:39:14 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦29 |
| 150674097 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 125) | ясно е, че нищо не е ясно :) commented 2025-12-11 21:38:00 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦754 |
 | 175376975 (Comments: 2) | BubbleTea888 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I understand, I have read the OSM wiki on changesets by now! :) commented 2025-12-11 21:30:17 UTC by BubbleTea888 ♦2 |
 | 175376462 (Comments: 3) | BubbleTea888 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This was before I read the changeset documentation on the OSM wiki... commented 2025-12-11 21:29:43 UTC by BubbleTea888 ♦2 |
| 175819902 (Comments: 1) | Kayo_33 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Judging by wiki page suggesting direction=forward/backward tags, maybe the speed display should be connected to road it displays speed to? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_display commented 2025-12-11 21:11:39 UTC by fghj753 ♦62 |
| 173737130 (Comments: 2) | murmeldin (Discussed changesets: 5) | hab's gefixt, passt das so? commented 2025-12-11 21:11:23 UTC by murmeldin ♦1 |
| 170823981 (Comments: 4) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 8) | hi thank you sorry for the mistake ı fixed my mistake commented 2025-12-11 21:03:46 UTC by dıscover ♦3 |
| 175790418 (Comments: 1) | sgws (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, tag "name" to miejsce na nazwę obiektu, a nie jego opis. Tężnia solankowa nie nazywa się "Tężnia solankowa". Nie ma ona też adresu. Oprócz tego połączyłeś ławkę z łąką. Poprawiłem wszystkie b... commented 2025-12-11 20:55:08 UTC by YomanNH ♦419 |
| 175776174 (Comments: 1) | Corsa5 (Discussed changesets: 153) | добрый день, у вас все комменты это "дороги" или "пои", можете плиз по существу подробней писать что именно меняете, "дороги&quo... commented 2025-12-11 20:46:55 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
| 175362948 (Comments: 1) | Kurt Stocker (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi, well just like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172375905 which I wrote to you about - you again made an incorrect change, why do you ignore the warnings the editor shows to you? You have 6 warnings in this changeset, don't c... commented 2025-12-11 20:37:45 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
| 175157158 (Comments: 3) | Adam Edwards (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi Adam, could I ask why you've removed the one-way tag from "Salmon Parade" in Bridgwater? Have the local council change their mind again? commented 2025-12-11 20:35:03 UTC by UKChris ♦46 |
| 175192643 (Comments: 3) | Nemesis143 (Discussed changesets: 4) | while here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454136446 you do it correctly, puzzling... anyways will fix those which will see commented 2025-12-11 20:34:14 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
 | 175416364 (Comments: 7) | MK 1 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello MK 1, thanks again for responding. I have not found any evidence of decimal refs on https://roads.org.mk/ or in the most recent street-level imagery. Could you please link the RAMS report you mentioned that has refs with decimal value... commented 2025-12-11 20:19:57 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦20 |
| 175817862 (Comments: 1) | trjdjx (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. - Zu den Wegen: Ein destination:forward auf highway=service ist eher unüblich. - emergency=ambulance_station Da es sich nicht um eine Rettungswache handelt, pa... commented 2025-12-11 20:18:07 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175762309 (Comments: 2) | EugeniyKH (Discussed changesets: 19) | Спасибо. commented 2025-12-11 20:16:28 UTC by EugeniyKH ♦15 |
| 175768334 (Comments: 2) | EugeniyKH (Discussed changesets: 19) | В онлайн редакторе проблемы с мультиполигонами. Сломать-запросто, редактировать не умею. Кто умеет, пусть поправит. commented 2025-12-11 20:15:15 UTC by EugeniyKH ♦15 |
| 84074207 (Comments: 2) | Vyacheslav 89 (Discussed changesets: 12) | ответите? я вижу что на сайте активны) commented 2025-12-11 20:10:11 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
 | 59049733 (Comments: 1) | kalu1820 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kedves kalu1820! Honnan ered a Közti-park elnevezés? Az interneten sehol sem találok ilyesmit, és a helyiek sem szokták így emlegetni a Dugonics tér és Kölcsey utca közötti h&aac... commented 2025-12-11 20:09:20 UTC by GBAB ♦109 |
| 175818675 (Comments: 1) | markkerrigan (Discussed changesets: 8) | removed point as water features does not appear to exist commented 2025-12-11 20:08:42 UTC by markkerrigan ♦12 |
| 171967482 (Comments: 2) | dragosandreipirghie (Discussed changesets: 5) | btw as I've mentioned in another comment here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172004505 - aren't those parking positions mapped incorrectly, as they should have a direction instead of mimicking the area, per wiki description? commented 2025-12-11 20:08:28 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
| 172004505 (Comments: 2) | dragosandreipirghie (Discussed changesets: 5) | and the main question - I'm not familiar with this tag rules, but the way it mapped is weird taking into account the description in wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dparking_position) "Draw a way from the relevant taxi... commented 2025-12-11 20:05:21 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
| 152249425 (Comments: 3) | Teddy73 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Danke für die Rückmeldung. commented 2025-12-11 20:03:18 UTC by ma-rt-in ♦1,759 |
| 175686575 (Comments: 3) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 63) | That makes sense to me! Thanks for the detailed explanation, I'm fully on board with your way of thinking here. commented 2025-12-11 19:56:38 UTC by nyanpsyche ♦14 |
| 175817089 (Comments: 1) | johnny67sixseven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi johnny67sixseven, Edits to OpenStreetMap should match what is on the ground - it's not a place for vandalism or false data. I've reverted all of your prior changes. Please make sure all of your edits are accurate before continuing. Th... commented 2025-12-11 19:54:08 UTC by Joe-w ♦27 |
| 175818110 (Comments: 1) | Hopla57 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Vu fermé sur place commented 2025-12-11 19:50:33 UTC by Hopla57 ♦55 |
 | 162601702 (Comments: 1) | mdelatorre (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12595100465/history has shop = marble that was added in this edit shop=marble ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it selling marble slabs? Marble products? Is it maybe man_made=works, rather than actua... commented 2025-12-11 19:43:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 168026309 (Comments: 2) | ThomasBS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Da es keine Antwort hab und ich mich auch über das Tagging hier gewundert habe, habe ich das mal selbst wie vorgeschlagen geändert. leisure=park ohne weitere Attribute bezeichnet einen öffentlichen Park, das scheint hier sehr wahrschei... commented 2025-12-11 19:42:06 UTC by rohieb ♦131 |
| 175813744 (Comments: 2) | faust175 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Остановку "Крымский мост" я перенес из зоны ремонта commented 2025-12-11 19:28:41 UTC by literan ♦6,902 |
| 173904057 (Comments: 4) | Davide Pastelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alright, understood. I often exploit the Strava Global Heatmap to fix the location of trails I know, or to add some. I get to know those trails through MTB rides or hikes, I do not go there specifically for mapping purposes: that is why I edit ... commented 2025-12-11 19:24:39 UTC by Davide Pastelli ♦1 |
| 175584052 (Comments: 1) | Baldi120 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, wurde da eine Geologie-Infotafel neu aufgestellt? Ich pflege gerade eine Tour von vor 2 Monaten nach und da war auf der Vorderseite eine Karte vom Stadtwald und auf der Rückseite eine vom Lehrpfad. MFG, Manuel commented 2025-12-11 19:20:39 UTC by Manuel H ♦59 |
| 175617754 (Comments: 2) | magik1969 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Fixed commented 2025-12-11 19:17:01 UTC by magik1969 ♦17 |
| 175815571 (Comments: 2) | jeawrong (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sistemato, grazie commented 2025-12-11 19:09:42 UTC by jeawrong ♦17 |
| 175812588 (Comments: 1) | thunderberry (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, noch einmal der Hinweis: Hydranten haben keine Namen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-11 19:01:48 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 173946656 (Comments: 7) | B_KSL (Discussed changesets: 130) | Pewnie powinno. Gdyby cokolwiek wskazywało na to, że nazwana miejska ulica przez takie działki przebiega. Ta ulica ani nie jest zagrodzona, ani w żaden sposób nie oznaczona jakoby ograniczała dostęp czy użytkowanie. Na tuszyn.e-mapa.net... commented 2025-12-11 18:52:43 UTC by B_KSL ♦95 |
| 175795572 (Comments: 2) | ninesevenoh (Discussed changesets: 5) | yes sorry commented 2025-12-11 18:52:02 UTC by ninesevenoh ♦3 |
| 175791281 (Comments: 5) | camminatoreseriale (Discussed changesets: 24) | Di nulla, ciao e auguri! commented 2025-12-11 18:49:15 UTC by EneaSuper ♦464 |
| 175804691 (Comments: 1) | saunter (Discussed changesets: 56) | Same here :-) commented 2025-12-11 18:28:21 UTC by Comino ♦270 |
| 175782539 (Comments: 7) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bzgl. des ersten: Klar fangen dann irgendwann wieder unterbrochene Linien an, aber kurz hinter der Verkehrsinsel sind die Linien durchgezogen. Darauf ist die turn restriction ja bezogen; Denn mMn ergibt es keinen Sinn die "Einbahnstraßen&q... commented 2025-12-11 18:27:49 UTC by stirps ♦12 |
| 175805830 (Comments: 1) | saunter (Discussed changesets: 56) | Please remember to add the address. Without an address they will NOT appear in the Cash app. https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Square-Merchants commented 2025-12-11 18:27:40 UTC by Comino ♦270 |
| 175779135 (Comments: 2) | CelianGdfrd (Discussed changesets: 2) | Mince !! J'étais persuadé d'avoir vérifié. Merci beaucoup !! commented 2025-12-11 18:24:06 UTC by CelianGdfrd ♦3 |
| 168762120 (Comments: 2) | TJ Clark (Discussed changesets: 1) | Updated to shop=convenience. Thank you for finding that. commented 2025-12-11 18:22:40 UTC by TJ Clark ♦1 |
| 175762046 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Both `addr:village=` and `addr:place=` should be added. Some villages use streets. Some are unnumbered by both, using DD lots. commented 2025-12-11 18:21:51 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,680 |
| 170281200 (Comments: 2) | franz! (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Stefan, war mit dem Motorrad da, kurviger.de hatte mir das vorgeschlagen. Die Straße ist aber für alle Kfz gesperrt. Ich schau mir das nochmal an PC an, was dort angeklickt ist. Gruß Frank commented 2025-12-11 18:19:34 UTC by franz! ♦1 |
| 175764127 (Comments: 7) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 79) | It is confusing, as signs use the no-vehicle white-only sign (ground truth), but traffic orders refers to motorized vehicles, and bikes might use some such roadways in reality. The worst is when "Bus lane" is painted, which means bikes are ... commented 2025-12-11 18:19:17 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,680 |
| 175768444 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 79) | `oneway:bus=` is the more common one than `bus:backward=` `oneway=` is somewhat more powerful than `*:*ward=` (`=reversible` , `=alternating` ) commented 2025-12-11 18:16:31 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,680 |
| 175758719 (Comments: 3) | NTUppark (Discussed changesets: 1) | That's great, thanks for confirming. commented 2025-12-11 18:16:21 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 89977794 (Comments: 1) | workaround (Discussed changesets: 3) | hi, well it's this again - so many incorrect buildings here which are just copy pasted and too big, I just reverted this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175814629 will add properly sized objects here commented 2025-12-11 18:05:15 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
| 166915285 (Comments: 3) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 25) | My view is that official_name only makes sense if there is a more common alternative name to take its place in the "name" tag. here there is none and there is no standard convention of using official_name instead of name with transformers a... commented 2025-12-11 18:03:12 UTC by kitsee ♦118 |
| 90112771 (Comments: 1) | workaround (Discussed changesets: 3) | bro that's such a lazy and incorrect mapping I just cant ahah https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842102005/history will delete and remap commented 2025-12-11 17:59:22 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦365 |
| 147191043 (Comments: 1) | TheRealDaymill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi TheRealDaymill, Sorry, I know this was awhile ago. Is there a reason why you removed `religion=christian` from Central Community Church? Should I add it back? Thanks, nullroute commented 2025-12-11 17:53:08 UTC by nullroute ♦8 |
| 175812529 (Comments: 1) | Marc Olzheim (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 commented 2025-12-11 17:47:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175813776 (Comments: 1) | Churp (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Churp, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 2 barrier(s) - 4 building(s) - 2 highway(s) - ... commented 2025-12-11 17:47:37 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,520 |
| 175813605 (Comments: 1) | Churp (Discussed changesets: 3) | Duplicated changes. Removing duplicates https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175813776 commented 2025-12-11 17:45:25 UTC by Churp ♦1 |
| 175812211 (Comments: 1) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hier der effekt. Rot alt - Grün neu. -1.3s - aber deutlich andere route: https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1174602,1174952#51.96228,8.50081,13z commented 2025-12-11 17:42:08 UTC by flohoff ♦2,419 |
| 175809552 (Comments: 1) | Muhmaker (Discussed changesets: 33) | Good catch - das war wirklich kaputt: https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1174401,1174949 commented 2025-12-11 17:40:48 UTC by flohoff ♦2,419 |
| 175434082 (Comments: 4) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 368) | Er staat een reactie van mij op een note. Misschien is het tijdelijk? Mocht het volgende week 20 gr zijn dan fiets ik wel heen 😀 commented 2025-12-11 17:40:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175780784 (Comments: 4) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ja - und dann guck dir in der Draufsicht mal an wo deine turn restrictions sind. Jeweils dort wo die durchgezogene linie untebrochen ist. Also braucht es genau an DER stelle eben keine turn restriction mehr. Es macht sinn die Fahrbahntrennung ... commented 2025-12-11 17:29:31 UTC by flohoff ♦2,419 |
| 157677777 (Comments: 7) | contempttipoffcrease (Discussed changesets: 2) | Also mentioned in another article (in catalan): > Al llarg dels temps l’algarium se sarditzà en s’Aliguera (Tola, 1850: II, 124-125) alhora que els genovesos i els pisans el declinaren la Lighiera (D’Oria, 1930: 79,... commented 2025-12-11 17:27:44 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦232 |
| 175806883 (Comments: 1) | Paul Scheckenbach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-11 17:23:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,520 |
| 175803664 (Comments: 1) | Stella tardif (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-11 17:22:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,520 |
| 175804453 (Comments: 1) | Moaid Hatim Ahmed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't add your personnal info commented 2025-12-11 17:21:50 UTC by ilias_ ♦385 |
| 175285888 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 908) | Have a very close look to the first version of the node, there is no space. What there is is a special unicode character at the end of the key and the beginning of the value. This 0x2009 character in the key is what I removed. For some reason ... commented 2025-12-11 17:15:20 UTC by mueschel ♦6,754 |
| 173770711 (Comments: 2) | Team Pantherbande (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Hb-, ich habe mich mit der Lienienvereinfachung vertraut gemacht und diverse Einstellungen ausprobiert. Mit der von Dir vorgeschlagenen Einstellung wird der Charakter des Bachs genauso gut dagestellt und habe es geändert. Danke f&uu... commented 2025-12-11 17:13:56 UTC by Team Pantherbande ♦1 |
| 175751457 (Comments: 9) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 123) | Nie jest trudno. A jeśli nie masz czasu, to edytuj mniej, ale dobrze, lub znajdź sobie inną rozrywkę. commented 2025-12-11 17:00:30 UTC by YomanNH ♦419 |
| 175808433 (Comments: 6) | OSSRocks (Discussed changesets: 1) | Binnen Organic app heb ik het weggehaald. Binnen Brave cache inderdaad hardnekkig. Binnen Firefox is het wel weg. Opgelost! commented 2025-12-11 16:57:15 UTC by OSSRocks ♦1 |
 | 159132142 (Comments: 1) | Lucas Liebler (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12339421585/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki... commented 2025-12-11 16:56:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 136782417 (Comments: 1) | labeldestination_jc (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10941504395/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki... commented 2025-12-11 16:56:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 138240158 (Comments: 1) | Argbjorn (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1164536672/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki.... commented 2025-12-11 16:56:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 163459911 (Comments: 1) | ERIC JAOUEN (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12650701844/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki... commented 2025-12-11 16:56:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 166500568 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 70) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3012311759/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki.... commented 2025-12-11 16:56:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175785214 (Comments: 2) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 15) | Vielen Dank, das war mir nicht ganz klar. Ich gehe noch einmal durch die edits durch und schaue mal ob ich da noch mehr von den Ampeln finde, die korrigiere ich dann noch commented 2025-12-11 16:53:07 UTC by stirps ♦12 |
| 172119369 (Comments: 2) | mmorell (Discussed changesets: 3) | Recuperada a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175811822 commented 2025-12-11 16:51:15 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦232 |
| 175665433 (Comments: 1) | Truck-thin (Discussed changesets: 8) | This change set is incorrect and should be reverted. commented 2025-12-11 16:47:37 UTC by andriu44 ♦16 |
| 175810695 (Comments: 3) | Marc Olzheim (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ah, perfect, dank je wel en excuses. commented 2025-12-11 16:44:32 UTC by Marc Olzheim ♦3 |
| 124859205 (Comments: 1) | riki53 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294975171/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:39:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
 | 142355792 (Comments: 1) | Gregory Bianco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404533977/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:39:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 157420527 (Comments: 1) | Blackhardz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82211468/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:39:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 150579703 (Comments: 1) | the_bobcat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501733825/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:39:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 161096871 (Comments: 1) | Simona Pergola (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778526554/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:39:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 117384295 (Comments: 2) | Jorisbo (Discussed changesets: 197) | Hi, Mateusz, no problem, regards, Joris commented 2025-12-11 16:37:02 UTC by Jorisbo ♦153 |
| 138983195 (Comments: 1) | Severny Veter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701105757/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:36:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 135214065 (Comments: 1) | Ringbarkis (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769890340/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:36:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
 | 130519269 (Comments: 1) | sulriograndense (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124990618/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:36:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 8753625 (Comments: 1) | Blazejos (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1365015563/history - to atrapa czy pozostałość prawdziwego samolotu? commented 2025-12-11 16:36:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175811242 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 570) | nawet jak to są atrapy, a nie prawdziwe: to stoją na tyle długo że są już stare :) commented 2025-12-11 16:35:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 133312291 (Comments: 1) | RedRocker87 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564817182/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:32:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 106980349 (Comments: 1) | Urbana rimor (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700522483/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:32:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 170840395 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384168931/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:32:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 167023773 (Comments: 1) | HERBERT JF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128022141/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:32:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175270678 (Comments: 1) | PapillonCharriere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167405741/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:32:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175746295 (Comments: 7) | flamezingel (Discussed changesets: 8) | 好的。那就这样了。现在老院区改成了老年医院和养老院，我想有必要去纠正一下了。总之，非常干洗您的指正，麻烦你了。好人一生平安！ commented 2025-12-11 16:30:05 UTC by flamezingel ♦2 |
| 170842919 (Comments: 1) | JoseLuis_S (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440077141/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:29:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 132121760 (Comments: 1) | Dick Jarrett (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375878963/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:29:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 115954543 (Comments: 1) | bardny (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20082193/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:29:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 164728206 (Comments: 1) | Sutallee Trace Stewards (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375696724/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:29:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 162638821 (Comments: 1) | warlekin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544342530/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:29:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 133059932 (Comments: 1) | oskehcat (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921319738/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value commented 2025-12-11 16:29:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175809582 (Comments: 1) | Paulmand (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey there, thanks for your contribution! I'm surprised there were this many traffic lights missing, tbh. Can I ask why you removed the `highway=crossing` tags where sidewalks intersected driveways? commented 2025-12-11 16:28:35 UTC by democat ♦10 |
| 175810226 (Comments: 1) | Nadja15 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revertad. De har fortfarande lokaler här med. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175810803 commented 2025-12-11 16:24:01 UTC by Nadja15 ♦17 |
| 158277314 (Comments: 2) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 66) | Hi Mateusz, I documented the meaning of this tag on the wiki page you linked, including what may be sold there. "Camp stores" are very common at North American campgrounds and don't fit well under other `shop` values. commented 2025-12-11 16:21:27 UTC by quincylvania ♦71 |
| 146527689 (Comments: 2) | ZenPhil (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Mateusz, I agree that sounds best. I have updated. Thanks. commented 2025-12-11 16:14:04 UTC by ZenPhil ♦26 |
| 175746313 (Comments: 3) | flamezingel (Discussed changesets: 8) | 我这里说不加“市”字的，是指这笔编辑被更改的“宜兴骨科医院”。 而对于宜兴市人民医院，我认为合适的做法是在新院区的name键填”宜兴市人民医院“这七个字（... commented 2025-12-11 16:07:04 UTC by 真中あお ♦36 |
| 163342624 (Comments: 1) | Spätzle mit Linsen (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, you added on the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462446640, a fixme="Line as no tag and is causing issues with uploads via ID Editor - likely can be removed I think". This line is part of a multipolygon (a relation) landu... commented 2025-12-11 15:58:22 UTC by zorglubu ♦346 |
| 175798734 (Comments: 1) | King of the Fridge (Discussed changesets: 1) | What about this location? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12772554004 commented 2025-12-11 15:53:53 UTC by yelisey90 ♦214 |
| 175807136 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 20) | You could tag it with access=private or opening_hours:signed=no commented 2025-12-11 15:43:55 UTC by rhhs ♦168 |
 | 175722859 (Comments: 1) | Heismuron (Discussed changesets: 3) | farmyard, not building commented 2025-12-11 15:43:43 UTC by VisibleSouth ♦9 |
 | 175808882 (Comments: 1) | Superadlen (Discussed changesets: 40) | merci commented 2025-12-11 15:36:35 UTC by Superadlen ♦173 |
| 175804368 (Comments: 1) | mariepuij (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2025-12-11 15:31:11 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,520 |
| 175806407 (Comments: 2) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175781333#map=17/34.739528/-86.589861&layers=N commented 2025-12-11 15:27:54 UTC by Ante Žunić ♦7 |
| 175808083 (Comments: 2) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Another issue. Do not cluster buildings, but map each building as an individual building. And, square the buildings with the Q key while selected. Best regards commented 2025-12-11 15:27:09 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 172923312 (Comments: 2) | Gangadi Anusha (Discussed changesets: 1094) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well. Regards, Anusha Gangadi commented 2025-12-11 15:26:54 UTC by Gangadi Anusha ♦10 |
| 175760192 (Comments: 4) | milet (Discussed changesets: 21) | Alle Links oben stammen nicht von mir. Ist auch ein neuer dazu gekommen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sind-hinweise-mit-driveways-wurden-noch-nicht-eingetragen-verboten/138372/128 "An der Art und Weise der Eintragungen ist doch... commented 2025-12-11 15:21:48 UTC by SimonHarms ♦9 |
| 175802138 (Comments: 2) | patrickc1994 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Typo highway=footway commented 2025-12-11 15:15:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174123015 (Comments: 1) | androl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Wenn die Bahnsteigkante oder die Bushaltestelle 'member' einer PTv2-Relation ist, ist 'public_transport' = 'platform' oder = 'stop_position' gefordert. Eigentlich müsste man den gesamten ... commented 2025-12-11 15:11:57 UTC by ToniE ♦1,240 |
 | 175780158 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los edificios y las otras áreas como la cancha? No debes eliminar edificios para volverlos a construir, lo que se debe hacer es mejorar la geometría https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_e... commented 2025-12-11 15:09:18 UTC by German C ♦90 |
| 175776749 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar edificios cuando estos si existen en la imagen satelital, lo que se debe hacer es mejorar la geometría de esos edificios, si aparece un edificio pero es una cancha debes corregir en vez de eliminar, si aparece otro... commented 2025-12-11 15:02:07 UTC by German C ♦90 |
| 175806102 (Comments: 2) | Markus Websites (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bedrijf verplaatst naar nieuwe locatie. commented 2025-12-11 14:58:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175673031 (Comments: 3) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 33) | But wasn't the last modification in 2023 then? In this particular case I'd suggest to add this using the date namespace: building:1895-1968 = depot (or whatever the proper tag is) building:1968- = warehouse For dates... commented 2025-12-11 14:49:00 UTC by mueschel ♦6,754 |
| 145083522 (Comments: 3) | StreetlightShaman (Discussed changesets: 1) | do you know socket type used at this charger? this info should go into a bit different tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man made=charge point commented 2025-12-11 14:38:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175804038 (Comments: 1) | Niek van den Berg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Beste Niek, vraag om import via het forum zodra de bouw is gestart. De hoogspanningskabel heb ik weer losgemaakt van de gebouwen. Wat is je reden om het toch zo te doen? MVG eggie commented 2025-12-11 14:37:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 171627330 (Comments: 3) | jeanl (Discussed changesets: 1) | taginfo can be quite useful for exploring it - https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop though note that raw usage can be result of bogus edits, retaggings or imports commented 2025-12-11 14:36:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 174329106 (Comments: 6) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 570) | > Co to jest man_made=track_ballast? Zobacz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Track_ballast commented 2025-12-11 14:35:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175802494 (Comments: 1) | Niek van den Berg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Beste Niek, Er staat hier nog helemaal niets. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.08402,5.602856,17/?datastrip=20251121_PNEO-04 Zodra de bouw is gestart kun je een aanvraag doen via het forum. Dan komen de adresnodes en... commented 2025-12-11 14:32:39 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175713162 (Comments: 4) | Sretne (Discussed changesets: 4) | i wielkie wielkie gigantyczne dzięki za podanie skąd to się wzięło! szkoda że na wiki taki bubel wisiał commented 2025-12-11 14:25:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175796852 (Comments: 1) | mattipi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. In Italia i numeri civici non vanno mai messi sugli edifici. Il numero civico è il numero che contraddistingue l'accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione (strada, piazza, via, ecc) immette direttamente o indirettamente al... commented 2025-12-11 14:19:58 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
 | 175765263 (Comments: 1) | Ruslan Volkov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Ruslan Volkov, I wanted to reach out to thank you for being such an active contributor – it's great to see your engagement and dedication to improving the map. I've been reviewing some of your recent changesets and noticed... commented 2025-12-11 14:04:07 UTC by worldqafix ♦10 |
| 175591472 (Comments: 1) | Moop204 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. * Buildings should have their corners squared. Be... commented 2025-12-11 14:01:24 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 172887204 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks for your edit. I've removed node [13196614634](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13196614634) (Stena Line ferry terminal) because this is double mapping: the terminal building already had these tags. commented 2025-12-11 14:00:40 UTC by LateNightTone ♦57 |
| 175794745 (Comments: 2) | Nordmyra (Discussed changesets: 13) | Sorry, hier der direkte Link zum Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99500072 commented 2025-12-11 13:57:02 UTC by reigi ♦68 |
| 175516664 (Comments: 1) | SYG34 (Discussed changesets: 2) | * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such ... commented 2025-12-11 13:55:48 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175801952 (Comments: 1) | julczi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj! Cieszę się, że postanowiłeś dołączyć do projektu OpenStreetMap! Niemniej jednak muszę zwrócić Tobie uwagę na kilka błędów, które, niestety, popełniłeś: - przy Kauflandzie dodałeś nowy parking (https... commented 2025-12-11 13:54:35 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦49 |
| 175789395 (Comments: 1) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 4) | * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such a... commented 2025-12-11 13:53:37 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 56264825 (Comments: 1) | HeinerSchaefer (Discussed changesets: 27) | Knoten: 5405351567 Hi Heiner, gibt es diesen Pegel noch? Wer ist der Betreiber? Ich kann auf den einschlägigen Seiten nichts dazu finden. Gruß gallseife commented 2025-12-11 13:53:08 UTC by gallseife ♦48 |
| 175803782 (Comments: 1) | ujinevich (Discussed changesets: 32) | Thanks for mapping on this project. About high buildings. You mapped it over the rooflines; however, the total needs to be moved to its ground plan. Best regards commented 2025-12-11 13:46:35 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175766480 (Comments: 1) | AJ Abraham (Discussed changesets: 1) | there was already a parking garage building here? commented 2025-12-11 13:44:12 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
| X | 175778876 (Comments: 2) | Ahmed Wali Deria Guled (Discussed changesets: 2) | Horrible changeset commented 2025-12-11 13:43:07 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
| 175770465 (Comments: 2) | Fliegende Elefanten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your feedback :) i am still learning commented 2025-12-11 13:35:31 UTC by Fliegende Elefanten ♦1 |
| 175787930 (Comments: 1) | Joe Panganiban (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why? Whats the point of dividing this? commented 2025-12-11 13:33:57 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦62 |
| 175790514 (Comments: 1) | Mphatso Chauluka (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bad shaped buildings removed. commented 2025-12-11 13:27:09 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175790180 (Comments: 2) | Mphatso Chauluka (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Again. After noticing how inaccurate and sloppy your mappings are, I decided to remove all of them. Remapping takes less time than repairing everything. Sorry. It can't be helped. Quality prevails above quantity!! commented 2025-12-11 13:23:00 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175430395 (Comments: 2) | Dacha2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Спасибо за исправление. commented 2025-12-11 13:20:38 UTC by Dacha2 ♦3 |
| 175802453 (Comments: 1) | Mrcy23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175803011 commented 2025-12-11 13:19:52 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802529 (Comments: 2) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802823 See also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19158 commented 2025-12-11 13:19:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175785556 (Comments: 1) | Stuart_L (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you're well on the way to no invalid numbers in Canada! Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11663930068 It looks to me like "+1-450-978-6888\\;5889" was am attempt to denote an extension of 5889, but y... commented 2025-12-11 13:18:28 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦351 |
| 175802459 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802760 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:57 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802441 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802760 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:57 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802410 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802726 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:26 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802375 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802726 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:26 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802320 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802726 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:26 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802297 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802726 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:26 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802199 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802726 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:25 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802171 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802726 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:25 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802149 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802726 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:25 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802240 (Comments: 1) | r00giewicz (Discussed changesets: 11) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802726 commented 2025-12-11 13:14:25 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175797345 (Comments: 2) | Ozgur Ozbek (Discussed changesets: 2) | When you map a building at the edge of your task, please map the whole building, even over the edge, rather than stopping at the task border. Best regards commented 2025-12-11 13:10:42 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175802394 (Comments: 1) | AdrianoGipsy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802501 commented 2025-12-11 13:09:25 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802018 (Comments: 1) | MáyerCsandrásAndrásBandrásBandiMEOWVaníliásKólaSimonKrémSzóda-Barát (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted personal names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802414 commented 2025-12-11 13:07:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801739 (Comments: 1) | Patakapitakaparta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802370 commented 2025-12-11 13:06:29 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801727 (Comments: 1) | AdrianoGipsy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802204 commented 2025-12-11 13:03:18 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801355 (Comments: 1) | Niek van den Berg (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43 Zie BAG importverzoeken. Gebouwen tekenen we eigenlijk niet zelf in. Die importeren we. Mapse eggie commented 2025-12-11 13:02:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175801957 (Comments: 1) | SugárMárton (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802142 commented 2025-12-11 13:02:01 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175802031 (Comments: 1) | SugárMárton (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802142 commented 2025-12-11 13:02:01 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801825 (Comments: 1) | SugárMárton (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802142 commented 2025-12-11 13:02:00 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801546 (Comments: 1) | SugárMárton (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802142 commented 2025-12-11 13:02:00 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801704 (Comments: 1) | SugárMárton (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802142 commented 2025-12-11 13:02:00 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175770551 (Comments: 1) | jose nav (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. * Buildings should have their corners squared. Best regards commented 2025-12-11 13:01:51 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175801996 (Comments: 1) | YuraFag (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802096 commented 2025-12-11 13:01:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801780 (Comments: 1) | YuraFag (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802096 commented 2025-12-11 13:01:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801891 (Comments: 1) | YuraFag (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802096 commented 2025-12-11 13:01:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801741 (Comments: 1) | YuraFag (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted vandalism or incorrect edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802096 commented 2025-12-11 13:01:05 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175800851 (Comments: 1) | Niek van den Berg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Da's mooi, maar beter is het om een verzoek om import te doen vanuit de BAG. Dat kan in het draadje BAG importve... commented 2025-12-11 12:59:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175801487 (Comments: 1) | QGIS_ora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted incorrect edits. This is not a motorway. Please ensure your edits match reality https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175802004 commented 2025-12-11 12:59:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801595 (Comments: 1) | DaveDollarSCH (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175801953 commented 2025-12-11 12:57:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801695 (Comments: 1) | DaveDollarSCH (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175801953 commented 2025-12-11 12:57:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801505 (Comments: 1) | DaveDollarSCH (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175801953 commented 2025-12-11 12:57:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801841 (Comments: 1) | DaveDollarSCH (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175801953 commented 2025-12-11 12:57:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801438 (Comments: 1) | DaveDollarSCH (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175801953 commented 2025-12-11 12:57:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175801778 (Comments: 1) | 21c-szabo-vukov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175801904 commented 2025-12-11 12:56:37 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175649704 (Comments: 1) | Anusha Kodi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please check your edits, you added "lacked" tags all over the world. commented 2025-12-11 12:50:46 UTC by mueschel ♦6,754 |
| 175349626 (Comments: 6) | Pablo Strubell (Discussed changesets: 9) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175801448 ; latest situation reflected commented 2025-12-11 12:48:36 UTC by kingkingHK ♦41 |
| 175800143 (Comments: 4) | Bartvdvli (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem. Ik heb daar wel eens gestaan en had een gesprek met de zoon des huizes. Die kwam meteen naar buiten. Het zal niet verder routeren over het erf. 😀 Groet.. eggie commented 2025-12-11 12:48:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175754205 (Comments: 3) | Herzi Pinki (Discussed changesets: 5) | der value braucht schon einen "de:"-Prefix habs entspr. geändert commented 2025-12-11 12:45:15 UTC by Luzandro ♦958 |
| 175718889 (Comments: 3) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 50) | Certo, le linee guida sulle relazioni hiking o foot sono restrittive. Se non le rispettano, meglio eliminare. Dopo effettuo la cancellazione. commented 2025-12-11 12:42:10 UTC by Cortix ♦19 |
| 175766412 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted south of LinkRoad edit since there is no signage for that part #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175800881 commented 2025-12-11 12:35:36 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 175800756 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | According source:hgv tags were added in changeset 175737531 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175737531#map=13/34.63389/-86.53990&layers=N commented 2025-12-11 12:34:18 UTC by Ante Žunić ♦7 |
| 175800110 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | According source:hgv tags were added in changeset 175737220 & 175781631 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175737220#map=18/34.713657/-86.626441&layers=N https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175781631#map=18/34.719483/-8... commented 2025-12-11 12:21:38 UTC by Ante Žunić ♦7 |
 | 175800091 (Comments: 1) | Brían (Discussed changesets: 1) | alt_name comes from name called when on the bus commented 2025-12-11 12:18:24 UTC by Brían ♦1 |
| 175672654 (Comments: 1) | neviksasha (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi, what is the ID you added in "source:external_id"? Is this used as identifier in some external database? If so, you could use ref:ABC instead, where ABC is a (short) identifier of that database. commented 2025-12-11 12:15:42 UTC by mueschel ♦6,754 |
| 175798729 (Comments: 2) | vropher (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #175799758 Svp geen bestaande wegen verwijderen uit OSM. Vraag desnoods via het forum hoe zoiets op te lossen. emergency=no? Ik heb de verwijdering voorlopig ongedaan gemaakt. Het is geen doorgaa... commented 2025-12-11 12:15:42 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175789976 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Isn't it a `short_name`? Afaik `loc_name` basically means a nickname that only people from a certain small area (usually the area around the object) knows about. commented 2025-12-11 12:15:12 UTC by kingkingHK ♦41 |
| 175756533 (Comments: 4) | schenklklopfer (Discussed changesets: 13) | I’ve changed it to man_made=pontoon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175799940 commented 2025-12-11 12:13:44 UTC by gurglypipe ♦958 |
| 175210025 (Comments: 2) | MLNNCK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Da du nicht antwortest, werde ich die angesprochenen Änderungen (nach Überprüfung vor Ort) rückgängig machen. commented 2025-12-11 12:12:26 UTC by Hendrik Helsper ♦2 |
| 175706097 (Comments: 1) | 4eyez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175799833 commented 2025-12-11 12:11:57 UTC by gurglypipe ♦958 |
| 63645956 (Comments: 4) | smb1001 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Ooh, I don't know. I think they have merit as separate relations given that there were 19th century acts explicitly to remove the detached parts of counties. There is thus some disagreement on whether the traditional counties include the detache... commented 2025-12-11 12:09:50 UTC by smb1001 ♦37 |
| 175796736 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 445) | J’apprécie l’utilisation du préfixe `contact:` (mais tout le monde ne sera pas d’accord). Cependant je préférerais que les données ne soient pas présentes en doublon entre la version pr&eacu... commented 2025-12-11 12:08:27 UTC by Ltrlg ♦97 |
| 140426621 (Comments: 1) | Nathan_A_RF (Discussed changesets: 421) | Hi Nathan, this is a late comment, but wanted to give some quick feedback - as I understand it, access=private is intended for places "not to be used by the public". In this change there are a bunch of paths and tracks that are explicitly a... commented 2025-12-11 12:01:25 UTC by amosharper ♦36 |
| 175794172 (Comments: 2) | el_emka (Discussed changesets: 9) | Good afternoon, I'm sorry. That shouldn't have happened. I just wanted to select all trees in view (actually a golf course near Genappe, where all these trees were already mapped and I wanted to add the leaf type info, as all of the... commented 2025-12-11 11:59:19 UTC by el_emka ♦8 |
| 175789790 (Comments: 1) | Oxford Vehicle Breakdown Recovery (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business. I've converted the tags which you used to ones which are more likely to be recognised by data consumers. It may be worth taking a look at the list of documented service types o... commented 2025-12-11 11:45:32 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175798473 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | According source tags were added to changeset 175736803 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175736803#map=15/34.68143/-86.54930&layers=N commented 2025-12-11 11:40:30 UTC by Ante Žunić ♦7 |
| 175792544 (Comments: 1) | aTarom (Discussed changesets: 30) | oops, thank you! commented 2025-12-11 11:33:09 UTC by yetzt ♦10 |
| 175797991 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | According source:hgv tags were added in changeset 175730944 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175730944#map=16/34.68989/-86.60093&layers=N commented 2025-12-11 11:31:28 UTC by Ante Žunić ♦7 |
| 175796694 (Comments: 1) | geofpowell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for adding this, but Buckland Primary School has been in OSM since 2012. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162902344 commented 2025-12-11 11:30:02 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175787783 (Comments: 1) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not add a layer to a building to hide an error. Just adjust the buildings and square them. Best regards commented 2025-12-11 11:26:36 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 167635736 (Comments: 1) | 明月绕船 (Discussed changesets: 12) | way/1395424247 duplicate of West Yuhua Road? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167635736 commented 2025-12-11 11:26:10 UTC by Convectional ♦5 |
 | 175762925 (Comments: 2) | DaanLT (Discussed changesets: 57) | labas, klaida, ne iš ten nusikopino, nė nepastebėjau. Ačiū commented 2025-12-11 11:21:07 UTC by DaanLT ♦112 |
 | 175759309 (Comments: 1) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi! You added archaic German names to Hungarian cities. Please remove these, and restore the old_name:de tag, this tagging was the request of the German speaking community. More info in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingua... commented 2025-12-11 11:15:39 UTC by infeeeee ♦619 |
| 175796665 (Comments: 1) | PeterEde (Discussed changesets: 3) | Top! commented 2025-12-11 11:05:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175796948 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | According source tags were added in changeset 175736402 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175736402#map=15/34.69017/-86.57576&layers=N commented 2025-12-11 11:03:29 UTC by Ante Žunić ♦7 |
| 175796525 (Comments: 1) | sollol1234567 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De school stond er twee keer op. Ik heb de schoolinfo van de gebouwomtrek verwijderd en jouw info samengevoegd me... commented 2025-12-11 11:00:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175796155 (Comments: 1) | Bartvdvli (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. De info heb ik verpaatst naar de adresnode conform tagging in OSM. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-11 10:48:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175796103 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | According source:hgv tags were added in changeset 175727274 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175727274#map=14/34.68979/-86.60982&layers=N commented 2025-12-11 10:47:07 UTC by Ante Žunić ♦7 |
| 175796118 (Comments: 1) | PeterEde (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Peter, Goed om zaken actueel te maken. Meestal is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers bij eenrichtingsverkeer. Is dat hier het geval. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor mofa en moped. Dan routeert het weer goed voot ... commented 2025-12-11 10:45:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175682448 (Comments: 1) | NiallNinjaMoore (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Could you check the location where you placed the AED https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13362246001 in this changeset? You've given it the description "AED , at Royal Oak, Laxfield , IP13 8DH", but you positioned the... commented 2025-12-11 10:32:11 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦294 |
| 174212806 (Comments: 2) | LorenzoPesci (Discussed changesets: 15) | Cancellerei, la descrizione del changeset parla di "test" commented 2025-12-11 10:28:56 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,800 |
| 175792619 (Comments: 1) | Roman Glasauer (Discussed changesets: 5) | L'attribut layer n'est pas adapté dans ce cas de figure. C'est bien level qu'il convient d'utiliser ;) Merci ! commented 2025-12-11 10:08:43 UTC by Rom1 ♦399 |
| 153777508 (Comments: 4) | yopaseopor (Discussed changesets: 148) | Pero es una dirección oficial según catastro o algo? En mi opinión aunque sea oficial no creo que se use o se necesite usar, no? commented 2025-12-11 10:08:17 UTC by pantufla ♦289 |
| 175396962 (Comments: 2) | MountainMakalu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello BerryTrails, The y-split on the west end visible in Esri and GPS traces suggested this should be a two way road. However, since you have local knowledge of this road, I’m happy to defer to your edits. Have a nice day! commented 2025-12-11 10:07:24 UTC by MountainMakalu ♦1 |
| 174705155 (Comments: 3) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 15) | As a local, could you please tell me what do you find correct? IMO it should be Kuta tagged as town with alternative name of "Kute" commented 2025-12-11 10:07:09 UTC by pantufla ♦289 |
| 150575384 (Comments: 2) | Руслан Т (Discussed changesets: 54) | Привет, согласен, есть такое подозрение. commented 2025-12-11 09:48:06 UTC by Руслан Т ♦50 |
| 175793050 (Comments: 1) | Stockbaard (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Stockbaard. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-11 09:45:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175762937 (Comments: 3) | Roman Glasauer (Discussed changesets: 5) | J'ai un doute quant à 'l'existence d'un parking souterrain à cet endroit. commented 2025-12-11 09:45:04 UTC by Rom1 ♦399 |
 | 175424938 (Comments: 2) | Tiramiso (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by changeset 175793701. Please respond to changeset comments in order to remain a good-faith member of the community. commented 2025-12-11 09:39:13 UTC by CRCulver ♦205 |
| 175792507 (Comments: 1) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Gijsbert.. algemeen access=private houdt alles al tegen. Kwaad kan het natuurlijk niet als je het aanvult. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-11 09:37:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 170593434 (Comments: 1) | __doge (Discussed changesets: 1) | And why did you add it when there is https://osm.org/relation/6725906? commented 2025-12-11 09:36:19 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175733570 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 344) | Hallo, Kruidvat zit volgens onze eigen gevens en de inschrijving van de KVK op nummer 49 en 49a. Op dit nummer zijn meerdere winkels geregistreerd. Rituals staat voralsnog geregistreerd op nummer 10a. Zou je het een en ader weer kunnen terugzt... commented 2025-12-11 09:31:42 UTC by borishag ♦157 |
 | 174203564 (Comments: 5) | Haisuli (Discussed changesets: 20) | Tämä selvä. En itse siis tee mitään tuolle nyt. commented 2025-12-11 09:28:46 UTC by HSL_HRT ♦40 |
| 175764114 (Comments: 1) | やえなみ (Discussed changesets: 1) | こんにちは。はじめまして。浜松市の Mappin' Jack Flash と申します。 OpenStreetMap (OSM) へようこそ！ OSMの編集を始めるにあたって「ようこそ！」のページをお読みになられたかと思... commented 2025-12-11 09:28:12 UTC by Mappin' Jack Flash ♦245 |
 | 175773619 (Comments: 5) | Gangadi Anusha (Discussed changesets: 1094) | Hi Anon, This is not vandalism. Apart from the slightly moved adress node and the uber ad in the comment his looks fine. Large Bboxes are a nuisance, I know. Do not revert this until Gangadi has chimed in. Thank you commented 2025-12-11 09:16:07 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,727 |
| 175766681 (Comments: 1) | Bezi_ (Discussed changesets: 10) | Node przystanku w stop_area to platform, nie bus_stop commented 2025-12-11 09:13:18 UTC by zuicz ♦292 |
| 175762943 (Comments: 2) | Roman Glasauer (Discussed changesets: 5) | merci pour le retour, non il y a bien 3 emplacements dans le parking voitures commented 2025-12-11 09:09:26 UTC by Roman Glasauer ♦3 |
 | 175779390 (Comments: 2) | Alexuc1306 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut, in regula, multumesc! commented 2025-12-11 09:00:19 UTC by Alexuc1306 ♦1 |
| 175404844 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi Baloo Uriza, My name is Surender, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. I appreciate your feedback. Regarding my edits: I updated the geometry to reflect a diamond interchange and added two missing motorway_links based on ESR... commented 2025-12-11 08:52:00 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦10 |
| 175759819 (Comments: 1) | OccoBell (Discussed changesets: 2) | When you make an edit which isn't directly related to HotOSM, please could you replace the generated changeset comment with something actually describing the change(s) you're making? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset... commented 2025-12-11 08:48:40 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175706928 (Comments: 1) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 101) | Bonjour, Je sais pas s'il y a un lien mais ce groupe de modification a modifié un grand nombre de lignes de bus liées à la modification de ce chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333745731 Elles sont en dé... commented 2025-12-11 08:47:41 UTC by michel60 ♦91 |
| 175791583 (Comments: 1) | 騎貢丸上學 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 打錯了，是復興北路地下道 commented 2025-12-11 08:44:11 UTC by 騎貢丸上學 ♦1 |
| 175775501 (Comments: 3) | Snorlax20 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Perfect, and the kerbs at the pedestrian crossings ❤️. Pavement mapping is surprisingly complicated, and the OSM Wiki sometimes can be a bit of a maze to figure it out. I have 11 different wiki pages bookmarked just for pavement mapping! commented 2025-12-11 08:40:18 UTC by 0235 ♦37 |
| 174587258 (Comments: 1) | Toki12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I see that you have placed these Russian "amenity=bureau_de_change" and add an website of a Russian site. I have not seen anything like this here and the mall says they use "Villa Döviz" for currency exchange. Are thes... commented 2025-12-11 08:36:49 UTC by EDtheWARDen ♦3 |
| 175760295 (Comments: 1) | Lilirsm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et merci pour ces ajouts ! Une petite remarque sur les numéros de téléphone, ils doivent comporter le préfixe "+33" et pas de zéro initial. Exemple: +33 6 25 65 71 22 au lieu de 06... commented 2025-12-11 08:36:16 UTC by cquest ♦281 |
| 175762916 (Comments: 1) | Roman Glasauer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, ce parking à vélo ne serait-il pas en doublon avec celui-ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13367312409 ? Merci commented 2025-12-11 08:28:38 UTC by Rom1 ♦399 |
| 175721393 (Comments: 2) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 110) | Hola, muchas gracias por revisarlo. Probablemente sea la extensión CADTools. El fallo no aparece siempre, pero cuando ocurre los puntos quedan visibles inmediatamente en la edición y puedo borrarlos sin problema… cosa qu... commented 2025-12-11 08:22:23 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦108 |
| 160757469 (Comments: 2) | localwizard (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, I just had a look on their Facebook page and they say they are closed now. Would need to survey to see what took their place I'm not sure how to categorise the shop though, it sells refils for lots of things. Like shampoo, soap powde... commented 2025-12-11 08:13:24 UTC by localwizard ♦3 |
| 159354436 (Comments: 3) | Aloade (Discussed changesets: 13) | Top ! Merci :-) commented 2025-12-11 07:56:58 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,172 |
| 175719878 (Comments: 1) | sfwd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao sfwd Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Ein Skatepark ist nicht ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark, wie du den hier erfass... commented 2025-12-11 07:54:29 UTC by habi ♦1,981 |
| 175787246 (Comments: 2) | 그루터기71 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19151 commented 2025-12-11 07:48:30 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 156203247 (Comments: 2) | Roggiii (Discussed changesets: 5) | I added the path surface via street complete, not sure if it did the KS Tag automatically somehow? I did not mean to include it. Can be deleted i think. commented 2025-12-11 07:41:13 UTC by Roggiii ♦5 |
| 175788689 (Comments: 1) | nexsyspros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-11 07:40:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175786989 (Comments: 1) | 그루터기71 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175789493 commented 2025-12-11 07:39:26 UTC by KennyDap ♦52 |
| 175337544 (Comments: 2) | samho1234567 (Discussed changesets: 28) | I didn't intend to delete Dongguanxi Railway Sta. (n/12290352339) from the route relation. This note was deleted from the route relation accidentally. The purpose of this changeset is to create a stop area of Dongguanxi Railway Station. It might... commented 2025-12-11 07:39:11 UTC by samho1234567 ♦27 |
| 174462275 (Comments: 1) | elmira_lyft (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Elmira, these lanes are only tolled to the east of TX 6 according to the website and my local knowledge. To the west, there are no tolling facilities and only HOV vehicles are allowed 24/7. I will make the appropriate changes shortly. commented 2025-12-11 07:10:44 UTC by kitto33 ♦6 |
| 175672219 (Comments: 5) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 185) | Михаил, что означает фраза "У меня много пешеходных маршрутов (п.м.),"? в OSM вносятся маршруты, существующие на местности и маркиро... commented 2025-12-11 07:09:28 UTC by literan ♦6,902 |
| 175438880 (Comments: 3) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 185) | в каком месте на эту дорогу можно заехать? неделю назад в этом месте стояли блоки, сам видел commented 2025-12-11 07:07:00 UTC by literan ♦6,902 |
| 162891977 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Why did you tag those one-way roads as not one-way? It's a divided highway, and the carriageways are clearly one-way roads. What is the source for this change? Thanks. commented 2025-12-11 06:53:16 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 174760332 (Comments: 1) | Tina Cao (Discussed changesets: 7) | The small box is still here. Can it be removed？ commented 2025-12-11 06:49:51 UTC by Tina Cao ♦7 |
| 173863685 (Comments: 1) | eton-tech (Discussed changesets: 2) | 1 địa chỉ bạn thêm 2 lần đó, 20 tháng trước bạn đã thêm một lần, rồi 44 ngày trước lại thêm cái này, mà 2 địa chỉ không cũng một vị tr&iacut... commented 2025-12-11 06:39:38 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦27 |
| 175734507 (Comments: 1) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 67) | driveways like yesterday https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-11 06:37:33 UTC by YomanNH ♦419 |
| 175701808 (Comments: 1) | mlebourg_hlc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Les relations "route_master" ne contiennent comme membres que des relations "route". Pouvez-vous corriger ? Bonne journée Marc commented 2025-12-11 06:34:53 UTC by mga_geo ♦278 |
| 163252087 (Comments: 2) | MacDony (Discussed changesets: 36) | Bonjour Swic, Je ne gère pas les itinéraires cyclables, je modifie la géométrie des segments. Si un itinéraire a pris mon nom, c'est que j'ai modifié son profil à un endroit, suremen... commented 2025-12-11 06:15:52 UTC by MacDony ♦30 |
| 175082690 (Comments: 1) | siavash_mohammadi (Discussed changesets: 4) | ممنون و متشکرم commented 2025-12-11 05:57:21 UTC by ahmadmazareisotoodeh ♦1 |
| 175786482 (Comments: 1) | Ruslan Fatih (Discussed changesets: 13) | 92-автобус в аэропорт. Добавил автобусную остановку. Исправил дорогу. commented 2025-12-11 05:50:28 UTC by Ruslan Fatih ♦41 |
| 175780741 (Comments: 1) | lekk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175785912 commented 2025-12-11 05:22:20 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175736276 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 121) | Yes, that's correct. The prefix was missing from these streets. Then you added a prefix to some of these streets ("Freedom Boulevard" -> "North Freedom Boulevard", "Center Street" -> "West Center Street&q... commented 2025-12-11 05:06:52 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦62 |
| 172793172 (Comments: 3) | manjurawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Spaghetti Monster, My name is Manju, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks for letting me know & correcting my errors. I split the roads & didn’t notice the direction of the way. Sorry for that &am... commented 2025-12-11 04:58:31 UTC by manjurawat_Lyft ♦6 |
 | 175645501 (Comments: 1) | Cody Richards (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175645501 commented 2025-12-11 04:46:01 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,140 |
| 128224644 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 67) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7204727501/history has shop = smoking that was added in this edit shop=smoking - is it supposed to be shop=tobacco ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=tobacco commented 2025-12-11 04:12:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 118750477 (Comments: 1) | ParkerRose (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9595666347/history has shop = homegoods that was added in this edit shop=homegoods ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=hous... commented 2025-12-11 04:10:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175781551 (Comments: 1) | cas79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi cas79, welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! What is your source for the phone numbers you added here to the seminary and church building? Given that church buildings don't have phones in them anymore, I don't expect them to have a phone n... commented 2025-12-11 04:07:53 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦62 |
| 175783898 (Comments: 1) | Matt's (Discussed changesets: 2) | source aerial imagery commented 2025-12-11 03:36:38 UTC by Matt's ♦1 |
| 175649030 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Feel free to improve this if have more info. commented 2025-12-11 03:34:00 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦75 |
| 175765563 (Comments: 1) | PatrikMüller (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you mapped some buildings here but they could be more accurate. Some footprints represent yards. Thank you for your contribution! Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](ht... commented 2025-12-11 03:23:21 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175772469 (Comments: 1) | Cateyes99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Some of the footprints here represent yards. take care to not create invalid shared nodes. Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `A... commented 2025-12-11 03:08:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175742681 (Comments: 1) | Steve0090 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I changed the road back to unclassified. OSM uses British names for tags since it was started in England. Unclassified is basically a rural residential road. Also, the county shows the name West Valeri Lane so I added it back. Let me know if this is... commented 2025-12-11 03:00:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,651 |
| 175773102 (Comments: 1) | Cateyes99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, the vast majority of footpritns you added here represent either vegetation or a patch of land of different colour. Thank you for your contribution! Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imag... commented 2025-12-11 02:56:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 17061770 (Comments: 1) | Gogul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230962544/history has KS = 2 that was added in this edit What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand... commented 2025-12-11 02:54:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 151297603 (Comments: 1) | riccardo31020 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913186185/history - what you tried to express by adding amenity=shop here ? commented 2025-12-11 02:51:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
 | 153000959 (Comments: 1) | ronaldp85 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11999292799/history has shop = bathroom_equipment that was added in this edit is it shop=bathroom_furnishing ? or is something else matching? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bathroo... commented 2025-12-11 02:48:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175729811 (Comments: 1) | Rikkywalla (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think the imagery was blurred as they georeferenc ed it. I don't see a building anywhere near it. Also - I removed the personal info which isn't allowed in OSM --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-12-11 02:47:30 UTC by Glassman ♦5,651 |
| 175272824 (Comments: 2) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 247) | 無要緊。 https://schema.gov.tw/lists/161 說 001鄰是 OK 的。 commented 2025-12-11 02:25:58 UTC by jidanni ♦56 |
| 175644572 (Comments: 1) | Trevor_1 (Discussed changesets: 187) | Hello, can you elaborate on what kind of sources, guidelines, or local knowledge you used to change the classification of this road? commented 2025-12-11 02:20:40 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦338 |
| 175597869 (Comments: 1) | Trevor_1 (Discussed changesets: 187) | Hello, can you elaborate on what kind of sources, guidelines, or local knowledge you used to change the classification of this road? commented 2025-12-11 02:17:04 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦338 |
| 175782156 (Comments: 1) | RoseBTCmap (Discussed changesets: 2) | Mo-Su 00:00-24:00 ?? commented 2025-12-11 01:46:09 UTC by Comino ♦270 |
| 175781627 (Comments: 1) | 37w4s (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks OK to me. commented 2025-12-11 01:44:21 UTC by Helferlein2 ♦1 |
 | 175782153 (Comments: 1) | fezi0704 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Im new on OSM, so apologies if this is a dumb question. Why isnt the new road I made showing up on the map? commented 2025-12-11 01:42:54 UTC by fezi0704 ♦1 |
| 175781511 (Comments: 1) | DSurach (Discussed changesets: 4) | What's your source for the addresses/names of the businesses? commented 2025-12-11 01:20:45 UTC by schobbish ♦7 |
| 175781424 (Comments: 1) | DSurach (Discussed changesets: 4) | Looks like you meant to include this in your previous changeset but that's okay --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175781424 commented 2025-12-11 01:17:32 UTC by schobbish ♦7 |
| 175781259 (Comments: 1) | DSurach (Discussed changesets: 4) | LGTM! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175781259 commented 2025-12-11 01:16:06 UTC by schobbish ♦7 |
| 175781158 (Comments: 1) | DSurach (Discussed changesets: 4) | LGTM, welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2025-12-11 01:15:05 UTC by schobbish ♦7 |
 | 169780266 (Comments: 1) | Cristina Pao (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13039726526/history has shop = verduras that was added in this edit shop=verduras kiosk ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only vegetables then maybe extra tag like greengroce... commented 2025-12-11 01:07:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 138055275 (Comments: 1) | vootza (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176321725/history has building = 54 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-11 01:03:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175641912 (Comments: 1) | jajanja3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | DWG revert - remove incorrect guideway tagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175781607 commented 2025-12-11 01:01:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175641073 (Comments: 1) | jajanja3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | DWG revert - remove incorrect guideway tagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175781607 commented 2025-12-11 01:01:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 147898850 (Comments: 1) | Damaris Santiago (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11663123606/history has shop = tienda_rural that was added in this edit shop=tienda_rural ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https:/... commented 2025-12-11 01:00:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 132983756 (Comments: 1) | CarlosMG (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9423477444/history has brand:wikidata = Q3751637 that was added in this edit https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3751637 from brand:wikidata=Q3751637 (brand:wikipedia=en:CajaSur) link company that does not exis... commented 2025-12-11 00:56:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 133641189 (Comments: 1) | Jose Alberto Escavia Jurado (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10733643053/history has brand:wikidata = Q3751637 that was added in this edit https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3751637 from brand:wikidata=Q3751637 (brand:wikipedia=en:CajaSur) link company that does not exi... commented 2025-12-11 00:56:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 124406810 (Comments: 1) | alex_lofi (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9920443131/history has brand:wikidata = Q3751637 that was added in this edit https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3751637 from brand:wikidata=Q3751637 (brand:wikipedia=en:CajaSur) link company that does not exis... commented 2025-12-11 00:56:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 126410309 (Comments: 1) | Ilia Tsygankov (Discussed changesets: 3) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5086664 ? Is it really a driveway? commented 2025-12-11 00:55:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175773119 (Comments: 1) | camateo (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-11 00:53:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175766193 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 00:43:35 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175765747 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 00:43:33 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175752733 (Comments: 1) | lukubuku (Discussed changesets: 26) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457451276 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-12-11 00:43:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175765261 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 00:43:28 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175768941 (Comments: 1) | in-map (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-11 00:43:27 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175756782 (Comments: 1) | nanzop (Discussed changesets: 33) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-11 00:43:20 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175763816 (Comments: 12) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place... commented 2025-12-11 00:43:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 151564114 (Comments: 1) | okolobasik (Discussed changesets: 18) | Весь будинок вже має номер 4к2. Навіщо було позначати під'їзди як окремі адреси? commented 2025-12-11 00:39:37 UTC by mike140 ♦357 |
| 170305734 (Comments: 2) | Bootprint (Discussed changesets: 22) | Fixed commented 2025-12-11 00:11:57 UTC by Bootprint ♦37 |
| 175563177 (Comments: 3) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Danke. Da ich an dieser Stelle immer mal wieder vorbeikomme, werde ich mich bei geänderten Verhältnissen ggf. melden. commented 2025-12-11 00:01:58 UTC by tracker51 ♦14 |
| 134913830 (Comments: 4) | EinEngener (Discussed changesets: 131) | Da Nutzer EinEnger nicht geantwortet hat obwohl er weiterhin auf OSM editiert, habe ich ihn gemeldet commented 2025-12-10 23:55:06 UTC by redd ♦450 |
| 175776795 (Comments: 1) | Eb975720 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Это автоматы по продаже воды? commented 2025-12-10 23:32:26 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 174734664 (Comments: 1) | Геннадий Сахно (Discussed changesets: 1) | Что здесь? commented 2025-12-10 23:20:09 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 171544345 (Comments: 3) | Wauteurz (Discussed changesets: 39) | Ik denk gewoon verwijderen. Van waterstanden heb ik verder geen verstand. Misschien dat een hoogwaterlijn langs de rivier wel nuttig is, dus zelf zou ik hem niet weghalen. Ik ben nu met heel andere dingen bezig (knooppuntnetwerken, die rollen ze nu o... commented 2025-12-10 23:19:04 UTC by Peter Elderson ♦153 |
| 175756916 (Comments: 1) | snayki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, the footprints you mapped here represent buildings, though some are oversized. The one I flagged is in fact a reminant of a circular building. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid ... commented 2025-12-10 22:57:18 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175658603 (Comments: 1) | armando3cd6 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ter informatie, de Dreambaby is er nog steeds, heb deze node dus hersteld. De nieuwe Colruyt zit in de voormalige Dreamland volgens het persbericht. commented 2025-12-10 22:40:47 UTC by ValidDistress ♦13 |
| 175739214 (Comments: 1) | davi lucas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá, muitas vias adicionadas não existem, na lista de camadas (lado direito) mude para Mapbox, está mais atualizada nessa região commented 2025-12-10 22:33:34 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,188 |
| 175777428 (Comments: 3) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 173) | Jakichkolwiek edycji, nawet tych poprawnych pragnę podkreślić. commented 2025-12-10 22:32:35 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦827 |
| 146050988 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 58) | That looks to be so. Go ahead and change it or I will get to it later. commented 2025-12-10 22:27:48 UTC by Natfoot ♦59 |
| 163752290 (Comments: 9) | Kurt PM Lapere (Discussed changesets: 11) | Je n’avais pas vu. Site qui écrit « Nouvell Rue Militaire » et dit que le « Kontact » de Port du Grand Large est dans cette rue. Indique le lien https://www.d... commented 2025-12-10 22:01:25 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦45 |
| 175777915 (Comments: 2) | TornadoFang (Discussed changesets: 10) | ah...hier lerne ich mehr als damals in der schulzeit ;-) commented 2025-12-10 21:58:28 UTC by TornadoFang ♦6 |
| 175776122 (Comments: 1) | noot_nooot (Discussed changesets: 1) | The fooprints you mapped here, but they could be more accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orie... commented 2025-12-10 21:58:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 174975384 (Comments: 1) | Sarang24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, the footprints you added here represent buildings but could be moer accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom o... commented 2025-12-10 21:56:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175707904 (Comments: 1) | thunderberry (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, Farbangaben erfolgen in englischer Syntax und in der Regel einfarbig. Hat die Haube eine andere Farbe, gibt es dafür bonnet:colour Und bitte die Positionsbezeichnungen überarbeiten. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-10 21:43:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175774435 (Comments: 1) | FFW Schwabering (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E&... commented 2025-12-10 21:39:11 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175753673 (Comments: 1) | thunderberry (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, bitte colour=red statt "rot", fire_hydrant:position=in Hecke bitte überarbeiten. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-10 21:35:15 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175766911 (Comments: 1) | thunderberry (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, auch hier: bitte die Namen verlagern/entfernen. fire_hydrant:position ist kein Freitextfeld, "neben Schild" o.ä. ist zu vermeiden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-10 21:33:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175770103 (Comments: 1) | thunderberry (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, Wasserentnahmestellen haben keinen Namen. Wenn es unbedingt sein muss, kann die Angabe eventuell in description. Hinweis: Bitte auf keinen Fall Namen natürlicher Personen aufnehmen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-10 21:30:41 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175721996 (Comments: 1) | trjdjx (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, Defibrillatoren haben keine Adresse. Bitte entfernen oder durch dieses Schema hier ersetzen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:object:* Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-10 21:23:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175772599 (Comments: 1) | wisielec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Temat-Droga (kolejne jego konto). Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175777428 Pozdrawiam serdecznie commented 2025-12-10 21:21:30 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175773784 (Comments: 2) | Torgeir123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear Torgeir123, I have reverted your recent edits because they seem to have accidentally deleted some data. commented 2025-12-10 21:19:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,495 |
| 175726853 (Comments: 2) | Sybertron (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour il n'y a jamais eu de 53 donc je suppose que c'est réservé pour le terrain à côté oui, pourquoi ? commented 2025-12-10 21:19:17 UTC by Sybertron ♦2 |
| 175770817 (Comments: 1) | Mon12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175777367 Dodane elementy nie istnieją w rzeczywistości. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-10 21:19:17 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
 | 175776042 (Comments: 2) | radokado (Discussed changesets: 11) | Vďaka za upozornenie, odpojil som to. Rado commented 2025-12-10 21:18:17 UTC by radokado ♦4 |
| 175776080 (Comments: 2) | Mezerklonzan (Discussed changesets: 1) | That's fine. I saw this with my own eyes earlier today. I was disappointed that it has been there so long but I never noticed it. commented 2025-12-10 21:17:08 UTC by Mezerklonzan ♦1 |
| 175710364 (Comments: 3) | Tonín (Discussed changesets: 1) | Marcado como "sendero peatonal" commented 2025-12-10 21:15:45 UTC by Tonín ♦1 |
| 175728387 (Comments: 2) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Die Wege habe ich primär auf Basis von Luftbildern und teils mittels dem ALKIS eingezeichnet. Einige können auch nur für Forstarbeiten und entsprechende Fahrzeuge vorgesehen sein. Dort wird ein Wanderer u.U. nicht langlaufen (wollen), ... commented 2025-12-10 21:14:50 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦46 |
 | 175733787 (Comments: 3) | TuAmigoElEditor (Discussed changesets: 61) | Puede que sí, realmente en algunos terrenos hay pequeños espacios sin techo y no es fácil distinguir techo de piso de cemento y por eso los quité, pero si vos distinguís bien, adelante. a mi criterio, es pref... commented 2025-12-10 21:12:41 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,615 |
| 175759660 (Comments: 1) | Centrum Opieki i Rozwoju Hajduczek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Przeniesiona czy zlikwidowana? Bo to jest różnica commented 2025-12-10 21:10:01 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 174967743 (Comments: 3) | Olivier Duquesne aka DaffyDuke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonsoir Olivier, Négatif :), c’est bien le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416809809 dont je parlais (vous pouvez constater par vous-même que c’est bien la référence qui ... commented 2025-12-10 21:01:48 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦45 |
| 175750132 (Comments: 1) | santoshipanwar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is a shared driveway, not a residential road. The houses are addressed off Wright. I have corrected the classification. commented 2025-12-10 20:56:36 UTC by Allison P ♦1,142 |
| 175772584 (Comments: 1) | bg85bg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia. Köszönjük a frissítést! Úgy látom, ez a Google térképről átvett név. Fontos, hogy lehetőség szerint a hivatalosan használt vagy kiírt név szere... commented 2025-12-10 20:55:12 UTC by qstep ♦11 |
| 169770855 (Comments: 1) | SOMBART (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, le noeud "La Poste" est un arrêt de bus qui était au bon endroit (là où se situait l'ancien bureau de Poste). L'agence postale communale (où a été deplacé ce noeud) e... commented 2025-12-10 20:31:29 UTC by déni ♦6 |
| 173648456 (Comments: 4) | Paschberg (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, railway=razed is not correct either, the only correct way of mapping it is on openhistoricalmap. On https://openrailwaymap.app it's also possible to visualise data from OHM sing the slider on top right. there are also ways to directly... commented 2025-12-10 20:24:27 UTC by AwFi ♦42 |
| 175676573 (Comments: 5) | nickvet419 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Agreed on being consistent commented 2025-12-10 20:17:55 UTC by ion_chi ♦47 |
| 175770411 (Comments: 1) | Zol87 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Hey Zol87, Where are you seeing a hyphen in self storage 1's name? commented 2025-12-10 20:17:05 UTC by ion_chi ♦47 |
| 175773833 (Comments: 1) | The real Carlos Beltran (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please note that types of roads ranging from footpaths, footways, residential streets to motorways are always described with the key highway. commented 2025-12-10 20:05:14 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175665758 (Comments: 1) | zwombie (Discussed changesets: 15) | Moin zwombie, hast Du dafür auch eine Quelle? Viele Grüße Roger Wilco commented 2025-12-10 19:56:11 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦766 |
| 174629115 (Comments: 4) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks! 👍 commented 2025-12-10 19:46:38 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦144 |
| 175774384 (Comments: 1) | Alexey Vazhnov (Discussed changesets: 35) | The change finally finished conversation in https://osm.org/changeset/164651727 commented 2025-12-10 19:42:28 UTC by Alexey Vazhnov ♦168 |
| 164651727 (Comments: 5) | Alexey Vazhnov (Discussed changesets: 35) | And… finally fixed! https://osm.org/changeset/175774384 commented 2025-12-10 19:41:22 UTC by Alexey Vazhnov ♦168 |
| 174486437 (Comments: 1) | Xavizard Knight (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hola, compañero mapeador, ¿podrías echar un vistazo a algunas de las carreteras sin etiquetas en este conjunto de cambios? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449508839#map=19/41.165978/1.247016 Y mas Saludos, Sandalman commented 2025-12-10 19:39:56 UTC by Sandal man ♦399 |
| 175652476 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 121) | I feared exactly this would happen. A photo from inside the tunnel is a sign indicating the start of I-10, even though it legally begins at Lincoln Blvd. I will change this accordingly. commented 2025-12-10 19:25:41 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦144 |
| 175772461 (Comments: 1) | trjdjx (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Zunächst eine Anmerkung vorab: Gerade in Fällen, in denen um eine Prüfung gebeten wird, sollte die Änderung an einem Objekt zusammengefasst werden. Ich... commented 2025-12-10 19:23:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175772609 (Comments: 1) | Bobby3 (Discussed changesets: 3) | A bit more about the goal of the changeset instead of just the name of the city it's in is appreciated. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175772609 ... commented 2025-12-10 19:20:50 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175687656 (Comments: 1) | Sander Sõnaj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tere, Oled joonistanud LTKH ümbrusesse kaks rada, mis paistavad viivat ei kuhugi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457010072 ja https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457010408 Mainisid muudatuses, et kasutasid GPS-rada. Sa ju ei pö&oum... commented 2025-12-10 19:17:47 UTC by fghj753 ♦62 |
| 175772711 (Comments: 1) | Xostre (Discussed changesets: 1) | "Área de Mantemento de Audasa" commented 2025-12-10 18:56:17 UTC by Xostre ♦1 |
| 127097523 (Comments: 1) | Bernard59118 (Discussed changesets: 84) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10079818263/history - what you meant by power=electrical ? commented 2025-12-10 18:51:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175728951 (Comments: 1) | DerEinzigeIKKE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das passt so weit alles, nur das emergency=ambulance_station dürfte hier nicht passen. Passender wäre wahrscheinlich emergency=disaster_response. Bei Fragen ... commented 2025-12-10 18:43:07 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175677446 (Comments: 10) | englu (Discussed changesets: 32) | Nie byłem, nie wiem czy PTTK już naniosło oznaczenia, ale mogę zapytać. commented 2025-12-10 18:40:55 UTC by englu ♦195 |
| 175735289 (Comments: 3) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 67) | Ale namieszałem i tak bo na Gdańskiej się nie zatrzymuje, zaraz poprawie:) commented 2025-12-10 18:35:01 UTC by stasiu512 ♦208 |
| 175771639 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 222) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 5086287 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-12-10 18:43\tclosed\tse cierra a la espera que se abran otras notas 5086300 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-12-10 18:40\tclosed\tok. serán dejados como access=no<... commented 2025-12-10 18:25:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175408606 (Comments: 1) | AH9999 (Discussed changesets: 7) | I'd be interested to know the source for the change in limit from 30 to 60 just to the south of Wilton village as you cannot see anything on Bing Aerial due to tree cover? Does the database you're using also contain weight limits, as I was ... commented 2025-12-10 18:11:38 UTC by JezCrow ♦157 |
| 174627634 (Comments: 3) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 141) | thanks! commented 2025-12-10 17:28:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 137440847 (Comments: 4) | whatever678 (Discussed changesets: 1) | > Do you know if there's a way to apply the change to all segments at once? for future - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2h49 can find such tag combo on greater or smaller area (Overpass can also find other tags or combinations) the... commented 2025-12-10 17:28:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175758251 (Comments: 1) | milet (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hallo milet, bitte mache mit den Änderungen hier aktuell nicht weiter, bis wir in der Community dazu eine gute Lösung gefunden haben. Ansonsten haben wir hier unabgestimmte Dinge, die man erst wieder aufwändig korrigieren muss. Danke. commented 2025-12-10 17:00:47 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦142 |
| 174477704 (Comments: 1) | zouloukk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salut, Je me demande si les rangées d'arbres sont bien appropriées pour les haies bocagères qui recouvrent le secteur. Les rangées d'arbres, selon les informations du Wiki, ressemblent davantage aux grandes ra... commented 2025-12-10 16:48:58 UTC by Swic ♦28 |
| 175763559 (Comments: 1) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hallo bernward1, hier die gleiche Frage: Wurden die Unterstände an den Haltestellen abgebaut ? Gruß Zrop commented 2025-12-10 16:35:38 UTC by Zrop ♦118 |
| 175726435 (Comments: 8) | jdv4osm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik ga eerst even via CARV de vraag stellen of ze al eens gekeken hebben naar de indoor "rolling carpet slope". Dank voor je feedback. commented 2025-12-10 16:27:10 UTC by jdv4osm ♦1 |
| 175688842 (Comments: 1) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hallo bernward1, gibt es den Unterstand hier an der Haltestelle nicht mehr ? Gruß Zrop commented 2025-12-10 16:17:14 UTC by Zrop ♦118 |
| 166786171 (Comments: 2) | Tallguy (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, thanks for the info - I've changed the tags in line with your comment. commented 2025-12-10 16:07:49 UTC by Tallguy ♦24 |
| 175351877 (Comments: 2) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi chiararik, why does that lead to errors? commented 2025-12-10 16:07:29 UTC by wildmaps ♦67 |
| 175549615 (Comments: 1) | Dan Keck (Discussed changesets: 1) | Did they physically add a median? The aerials makes it look incorrectly split. commented 2025-12-10 16:01:26 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦88 |
| 175765809 (Comments: 1) | Qizhen Ruan (Discussed changesets: 4) | whats your source for this, as the bing aerial imagery does not show the sidewalk connecting to way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823010363 , I cant find any evidence of the sidewalk extending that far, so why did you do this? Happy mappin... commented 2025-12-10 16:00:59 UTC by Udarian ♦538 |
| 175746360 (Comments: 1) | Piotr Szczekała (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej! Przydatna edycja, jednak zwrócę uwagę na to, że nie usunąłeś tagów construction z toru. Tak samo teren kolejowy nadal w budowie. commented 2025-12-10 15:53:42 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦29 |
| 175438889 (Comments: 2) | kalmika07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oui c'est bien celà. La vue aérienne correspond à une période de 5 ans de piste cyclable sur la route de 2020 à 2025 et n'est plus à jour maintenant. Tu peux voir une vue caméra du retour de ... commented 2025-12-10 15:31:53 UTC by kalmika07 ♦1 |
| 175407975 (Comments: 1) | zpu_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Because of 'review_requested': I separated Calterah from the address and added it as a separate office node. The edit looks good apart form that, thank you! commented 2025-12-10 15:22:42 UTC by map per ♦1,319 |
| 175737327 (Comments: 2) | Ferchasa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sin repeticiones quiero decir, no es que una vez y asi queden, sino que sin repetir los datos. commented 2025-12-10 15:13:37 UTC by muralito ♦2,095 |
| 165399064 (Comments: 4) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ok, dobre vediet, budem to odteraz pisat bez medzery. commented 2025-12-10 15:11:00 UTC by ticho2 ♦25 |
| 175763163 (Comments: 1) | BramvDeventer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Bram , Ik heb de hoofdtag leisu=playground toegevoegd Je ziet anders niets CTRL F5 voor effect straks. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-10 15:06:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175671786 (Comments: 4) | Eklo Hôtel (Discussed changesets: 1) | merci, c'est mis à jour :) commented 2025-12-10 14:54:33 UTC by Eklo Hôtel ♦1 |
| 175742189 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 9) | you need to stop submitting changesets with a bounding box this large commented 2025-12-10 14:54:17 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
 | 175661839 (Comments: 3) | CRCulver (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hello again, CRCulver, Thank you for the clarification. I just want to clarify my point briefly: Some of the ways you tagged as _link are not actually link roads — they are simply continuations or forks of the main road. In these ca... commented 2025-12-10 14:23:53 UTC by mohamedd_ahmed ♦2 |
| 175762026 (Comments: 1) | meongseolin (Discussed changesets: 42) | 添加台湾高速公路（线网）关系 commented 2025-12-10 14:18:53 UTC by meongseolin ♦39 |
| 175759880 (Comments: 3) | Jacek Nykiel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Temat-Droga: tak, twoje edycje będą wycofywane BEZ weryfikacji w terenie, w przypadku zbanowanych kont jest to zbędne z oczywistych przyczyn commented 2025-12-10 14:17:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175737646 (Comments: 1) | coffee1413 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The shop should be located at the office, usually a node unless outline is known. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175737646 commented 2025-12-10 14:14:03 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175687036 (Comments: 5) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 44) | Widzę, że poprawiłeś kolejność. Ja z kolei załatałem "dziurę": https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175761367 W JOSM wystarczy dodać drugi raz te odcinki :-) commented 2025-12-10 14:07:07 UTC by SzymonH ♦218 |
| 175749313 (Comments: 1) | Trk465 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Uydu görüntülerinden anlaşıldığı kadarıyla bu alanda birden çok bina bulunuyor. Binaları silip, yeniden building=* etiketiyle tek bina şeklinde eklemeniz(changeset/175749343) maalesef doğru değil. building=* e... commented 2025-12-10 14:02:59 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦180 |
| 175760660 (Comments: 1) | Guntur Tigariawibawa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hanya boleh menambahkan alamat rumah, namun tidak boleh menambahkan informasi pribadi seperti nama pemilik rumah. commented 2025-12-10 13:56:19 UTC by FajrAl ♦125 |
| 174306750 (Comments: 2) | ItaliA1delSole (Discussed changesets: 17) | https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autostrada_A15_(Italia)#Diramazione_per_Santo_Stefano_di_Magra commented 2025-12-10 13:54:14 UTC by ItaliA1delSole ♦4 |
| 175760791 (Comments: 1) | Arbuzik55 (Discussed changesets: 4) | dawnego* commented 2025-12-10 13:53:51 UTC by Arbuzik55 ♦5 |
| 139702626 (Comments: 2) | kkrauseADFC (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Mateus, thank you for point that out. We'll update our map of self-service bike repair shops to use service:bicycle:repair=yes in addition to the obsolete tag and we will stop using the obsolete tag from now on. We are not planning update ... commented 2025-12-10 13:53:43 UTC by kkrauseADFC ♦1 |
| 175575513 (Comments: 2) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yes that is my guess too, which I why I changed some of them to `leisure=park` when it is "obviously" the case, the ones I deleted were unbelievable or added by users with a history of adding non-existent features. commented 2025-12-10 13:48:07 UTC by kingkingHK ♦41 |
| 175759927 (Comments: 1) | Mark Scheijde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-10 13:38:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
 | 175378778 (Comments: 2) | AL HAMD KHALID (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area recently have been destructive as they... commented 2025-12-10 13:25:14 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175412031 (Comments: 1) | Shuhan Zheng (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area recently have been destructive as they... commented 2025-12-10 13:25:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175423232 (Comments: 2) | ZzzzzzC (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area recently have been destructive as they... commented 2025-12-10 13:25:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175424422 (Comments: 2) | FredTand (Discussed changesets: 1) | OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area recently have been destructive as they... commented 2025-12-10 13:25:02 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175756570 (Comments: 2) | KMNK96 (Discussed changesets: 4) | OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area have been destructive as they were of ... commented 2025-12-10 13:22:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175755185 (Comments: 1) | KMNK96 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175759215 commented 2025-12-10 13:17:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175756413 (Comments: 1) | KMNK96 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175759215 commented 2025-12-10 13:17:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175756351 (Comments: 1) | KMNK96 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175759215 commented 2025-12-10 13:17:31 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175758493 (Comments: 1) | Bricolas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not duplicate addresses, OSM works with address inheritance. I will fix this. commented 2025-12-10 13:16:45 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 175752741 (Comments: 2) | mfortini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Per prudenza, in quei casi ho revertato. Grazie commented 2025-12-10 13:15:06 UTC by mfortini ♦1 |
| 175758022 (Comments: 1) | TeamUpNL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag TeamUp. Het lijkt me niet correct dat name=basket op dit veld staat. (tag voorgaande mapper) Ik heb name=basket verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-10 13:13:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175752370 (Comments: 1) | J Anderson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-10 13:09:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
 | 175445897 (Comments: 6) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thank you for your reply. I would say that standardizing fields allows tools that reuse the OSM database to be more likely to take them into account. If you look at taginfo: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/maxspeed#values, there are... commented 2025-12-10 13:02:24 UTC by K12230LF ♦44 |
| 172861688 (Comments: 1) | LeoBorGiov (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ciao, ho notato che i fix che sono stati fatti in zona Forte di Orino sono sbagliati. Risultano incoerenti e spostati rispetto alla realtà. Prima di queste modifiche era tutto giusto. Chiedo di verificare e ripristinare, grazie mille. commented 2025-12-10 12:59:20 UTC by Matteo Marzoli ♦2 |
| 113707407 (Comments: 1) | Hungerburg (Discussed changesets: 40) | schau dir mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001831431 an bitte; kann weg? commented 2025-12-10 12:58:46 UTC by fs_LT ♦110 |
| 172863109 (Comments: 1) | LeoBorGiov (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ciao, ho notato che questi fix (e altri sempre di LeoBorGiov) che sono stati fatti in zona Forte di Orino sono sbagliati. Risultano incoerenti e spostati rispetto alla realtà. Prima di queste modifiche era tutto giusto. Chiedo di verificare e ... commented 2025-12-10 12:57:19 UTC by Matteo Marzoli ♦2 |
| 175726885 (Comments: 8) | Hans Leenders (Discussed changesets: 1) | Helemaal goed zo. Bedankt voor de medewerking. Groet, Hans commented 2025-12-10 12:56:30 UTC by Hans Leenders ♦1 |
| 175756764 (Comments: 2) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 173) | Det stykke som ikke er åbnet kan, hvis det endelig skal være, tagges med 'access=no' commented 2025-12-10 12:48:38 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,735 |
| 175703474 (Comments: 14) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 107) | > Uważam to z bezsensowne i nieprzyczyniające się do poprawy tego projektu, żeby doszukiwać się i wycofywać każdą ostatnią jego edycję bez wcześniejszego przeprowadzenia analizy co do rzeczywistej kategorii drogi. wytępienie zm... commented 2025-12-10 12:46:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175756928 (Comments: 1) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 173) | Lisbjergbakken er ikke 'tertiary' 'residential' passer bedre commented 2025-12-10 12:34:48 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,735 |
| 125335682 (Comments: 4) | OSM_RogerWilco (Discussed changesets: 59) | Danke! commented 2025-12-10 12:30:35 UTC by OpenStreetBoy ♦31 |
| 175720542 (Comments: 1) | Office de tourisme de Mussidan-Villamblard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap, Merci pour votre ajout de restaurant. Cependant, il semblerait que par cet ajout vous ayez remplacé le lieu-dit ou hameau "La Libertie" par le restaurant en lui-même : http... commented 2025-12-10 12:29:51 UTC by K12230LF ♦44 |
| 150332634 (Comments: 1) | QS78AGC2CZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | endereço desatualizado! Novo endereço: Avenida Doutor Luiz Antônio 356 Centro de Parnamirim (próximo a linha do trem) commented 2025-12-10 12:29:19 UTC by Lancheiras da Lú ♦1 |
| 167976043 (Comments: 1) | TomN1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vilkaise karttailmoitusta https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5049914, jonka mukaan pysäkin nimi on väärä commented 2025-12-10 12:27:16 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦72 |
| 165202762 (Comments: 4) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 127) | haha joo, war wegen einer anderen Notiz ;) commented 2025-12-10 12:21:24 UTC by Piagno ♦116 |
| 170946502 (Comments: 1) | Coucouf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, merci pour ces ajouts. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424098243/history/2 une suggestion : mettre l'unité de puissance kW :) Cordialement, Marc commented 2025-12-10 12:18:15 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 86596018 (Comments: 1) | ERIC JAOUEN (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, tu as renseigné 2 stations très proche https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7617619946 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7617619945 est-ce que ce sont 2 bornes d'un même opérateur et si oui connais-... commented 2025-12-10 12:15:36 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 175735616 (Comments: 1) | Philline (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap, Vous avez ajouté un noeud du type Attraction tout proche de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9543778902 Vouliez-vous dire que ce cap est une attraction touristique ? Vous trouverez ci... commented 2025-12-10 12:14:35 UTC by K12230LF ♦44 |
| 175728082 (Comments: 1) | Cipix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap :) Merci pour votre modification. A noter qu'en plus du changement de nom et de marque en KFC, il faut également changer le type de commerce. Pour le moment, il subsiste encore les termes : |
| 175753871 (Comments: 1) | Holzwurm64 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Holzwurm https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457455661 heisst mit grosser Sicherheit nicht 'Trail', sondern ist ein solcher, d.h. kann mit `bicycle`-Tags oder so ausgezeichnet werden. Gruss, habi commented 2025-12-10 12:09:38 UTC by habi ♦1,981 |
| 175739492 (Comments: 3) | Christian Budde (Discussed changesets: 1) | War ja schon alles ganz gut. Bei einer Firma mit größere Zufahrt würde ich highway=service ohne ohne weiteres service tag verwenden. Bei kleineren rein privaten Zufahrten könnte man service=driveway nehmen ( Zufahrt Mitarbe... commented 2025-12-10 12:08:39 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,453 |
| 175669066 (Comments: 1) | JopiJopa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM. Merci pour l'ajout de l'Aire de Jeux. La syntaxe pour l'accès ou non des chiens est disponible ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:dog A noter que vous pouvez, si v... commented 2025-12-10 12:05:02 UTC by K12230LF ♦44 |
| 175746505 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 244) | I think these ways were already tagged correctly, so I undid this edit. commented 2025-12-10 12:00:44 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦62 |
| 175742376 (Comments: 1) | RodrigoBC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Esta es la base de datos en producción. No es un lugar para pruebas. Las ediciones serán reversadas --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175742376 commented 2025-12-10 11:54:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 127322000 (Comments: 3) | ainki (Discussed changesets: 7) | I have now removed the office tag from the object. commented 2025-12-10 11:50:58 UTC by ainki ♦15 |
| 172723647 (Comments: 3) | OsmIdf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merci pour ton retour. dans l'opendata national c'est supervision-ev.france@totalenergies.com ho joie :s Je leur ai écris commented 2025-12-10 11:49:31 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 175751662 (Comments: 1) | A736 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bon travail commented 2025-12-10 11:48:47 UTC by ilias_ ♦385 |
| 175755302 (Comments: 1) | Thibault Rommel (Discussed changesets: 55) | *update M11 commented 2025-12-10 11:47:03 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦87 |
| 175731556 (Comments: 1) | pinky1974 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Avevo gia' messo i tag corretti https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175754743 commented 2025-12-10 11:35:28 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 175754420 (Comments: 1) | Cresma (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://cresma.es/ commented 2025-12-10 11:32:39 UTC by Cresma ♦1 |
| 157671112 (Comments: 1) | Константин Коцев (Discussed changesets: 3) | На какъв източник е базирана тази промяна? Има ли реално обозначени обекти с името „Велиица“? commented 2025-12-10 11:27:13 UTC by lqlqlqlio ♦11 |
| 168588896 (Comments: 1) | CSiR Krajna Arena (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5035333 oraz https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12985105701 Wydaje mi się, że ten AED został dodany przez przypadek. Proszę o potwierdzenie, to go skasuję. commented 2025-12-10 11:23:27 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,784 |
| 160564545 (Comments: 2) | OrcaDan (Discussed changesets: 21) | also address is already on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1345394393 commented 2025-12-10 11:18:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 132312690 (Comments: 1) | Lamb_eus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10632722995/history has barrier = obstacle that was added in this edit What kind of barrier is here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier for a typical values commented 2025-12-10 11:11:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175152632 (Comments: 2) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 54) | Deze wijzingenset was enkel om tags te verwijderen, want die reeds bestaan op een area. Er was geen fout hier. Uw kommentaar is blijkbaar om *extra informatie* te bieden. Bedankt hiervoor maar aub liever een nota openen. commented 2025-12-10 11:11:02 UTC by multimob ♦80 |
| 175713872 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 4) | oneway=no is correct for this street, why remove it? commented 2025-12-10 11:08:08 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦62 |
| 175721921 (Comments: 1) | Wandergecko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoffe, alles ok commented 2025-12-10 11:04:59 UTC by Wandergecko ♦1 |
| 175730459 (Comments: 1) | El Chilly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/13124217512 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! commented 2025-12-10 10:53:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175737578 (Comments: 1) | Kcalbkram (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. You also moved the two additionals nodes https://www.osm.org/node/13260591090 (Hydrant), ht... commented 2025-12-10 10:43:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 160289917 (Comments: 1) | szymo1500 (Discussed changesets: 14) | I think subareas shouldn't be added. In Estonia to my knowledge we haven't adopted any specific data schema that makes certain use of subarea roles in certain situations. As per relation type documentation[1] subareas are generally n... commented 2025-12-10 10:40:20 UTC by Pikse ♦220 |
| 175627442 (Comments: 2) | andyp-bw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für die Info. Das war wirklich nicht beabsichtigt, sondern ist durch die Zusammenführung des Flusslaufs passiert. Ich hoffe jetzt passt es commented 2025-12-10 10:37:02 UTC by andyp-bw ♦1 |
| 175731068 (Comments: 1) | RunningGoofy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag RunningGoofy, Het simpele feit dat een slingerhekje een fietsverbod inhoudt klopt niet. Je mag op meer plaatsen fietsen dan je denkt. Je tagt een 'footway' daar mag inderdaad niet gefietst worden als er een G7 bord staat o... commented 2025-12-10 10:32:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 162700608 (Comments: 1) | Aditya@iitbhu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12600686959/history has shop = sweet store that was added in this edit shop=sweet store ? What kind of shop, if any is here? is it shop=confectionery ? or is something else matching? See http... commented 2025-12-10 10:30:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175671709 (Comments: 3) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Also, please respond when someone comments on any of your changesets pointing out issues to you or requesting further information about your edits. This helps avoid issues and builds trust between you and other mappers on OSM. Users who never respond... commented 2025-12-10 10:24:30 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 144963233 (Comments: 1) | vbence (Discussed changesets: 9) | In this change you have helpfully added pavements alongside roads correctly tagged as footway=sidewalk. However, you have not updated tags on the corresponding roads to sidewalk:*=separate as described on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Si... commented 2025-12-10 10:20:51 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 68889952 (Comments: 1) | Wesleey Borges (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3292231321/history is adding nature=rock here intentional? commented 2025-12-10 10:14:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175720085 (Comments: 1) | Emmanuelle Guilbert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci pour cet ajout. Je me suis permis de reprendre la route en fusionnant les deux voies là où il n'y a pas de séparation physique entre elles. J'ai aussi enlevé l'attribut disant que l'acc&e... commented 2025-12-10 10:03:20 UTC by Syl ♦1,012 |
| 157087528 (Comments: 1) | sbaido (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi sbaido, Thanks for contributing to the challenge. Did you check any of the provided information before adding this school to the map? There is no school at this location, only a related office. The contact info you added (name, email and we... commented 2025-12-10 10:00:48 UTC by djsa ♦27 |
| 174818967 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Why did you remove the gates from this driveway? I can see in the Bing Streetside street-level photos from 2021 that there are gates on both sides of the driveway. Did those gates recently get removed? If those gates are still there and open, then yo... commented 2025-12-10 09:59:35 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175728565 (Comments: 1) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 52) | A jest plan naniesienia nowych ID i linków do rozkładów? commented 2025-12-10 09:56:27 UTC by Mariusz Dykierek ♦32 |
| 122550583 (Comments: 2) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 79) | Das ist jetzt der Zuständigkeitsbereich der Oldenburger Wanderfreunde! commented 2025-12-10 09:48:10 UTC by Pathumthani ♦39 |
| 122453750 (Comments: 2) | alexashh (Discussed changesets: 3) | 22 refers to maintenance service office number 22. There are a lot of offices like this scattered in the Nizhny Novgorod. usually they are named "Жилсервис №x". These organisations responsibility to register citizens in their pro... commented 2025-12-10 09:45:52 UTC by alexashh ♦44 |
| 175719865 (Comments: 2) | mikki65 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Fatto revert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175750042 commented 2025-12-10 09:42:33 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 175669829 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 30) | Also, I can see that you added a non-existent bridge, which I don't think there is really a bridge here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456912459 commented 2025-12-10 09:41:52 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175749409 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 17) | im pretty sure i got all the road split. honestly its not a good median. its effectively a 4 inch median with bollards on top. that won't stop a car traveling at 60. Sorry for spamming but it took a while to fix some things along ramona expressw... commented 2025-12-10 09:28:33 UTC by ieguy3 ♦17 |
| 175748977 (Comments: 1) | Mamutinka (Discussed changesets: 100) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309912745 |
| 175749033 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 17) | its a small median because people keep dying. they still go over the line. commented 2025-12-10 09:18:17 UTC by ieguy3 ♦17 |
| 175535795 (Comments: 3) | 47NOE (Discussed changesets: 14) | Merci pour ton retour. J'ai justement amélioré hier le pré-processeur à propos de cet accent, osmose ne devrait plus proposer sa suppression par erreur https://github.com/Jungle-Bus/ref-EU-EVSE/commit/adb84bcc9... commented 2025-12-10 09:15:11 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 167419030 (Comments: 1) | TWHB (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi, why do you change type=route + route=pipeline to type=pipeline (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9233805/history/29) when there is no documentation about that and you do not give any reason for that? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-12-10 09:15:08 UTC by kapazao ♦954 |
| 150225279 (Comments: 1) | tykayn (Discussed changesets: 25) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830839694 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830839700 J'ai l'impression que les 2 ne font qu'un et se nome Jean Lain Occasions Spoticar https://occasions.jeanlain.com/nos... commented 2025-12-10 09:10:04 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 175194377 (Comments: 1) | Donaufelder (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, deine Änderungen zu ETCS sind (wieder) falsch, ich habe das hier schon kommentiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171067740#map=15/48.20733/16.19011 Ich werde die Änderungen wieder rückgängig machen,... commented 2025-12-10 09:06:52 UTC by Negjana ♦32 |
| 171973432 (Comments: 1) | Deftax (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nie wiem na jakiej podstawie odwróciłeś jednokierunkowość, ale po tej zmianie była ona niezgodna z rzeczywistością. Wycofałem. commented 2025-12-10 09:02:33 UTC by YomanNH ♦419 |
| 155237741 (Comments: 1) | Lebuin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Already existing commented 2025-12-10 08:54:35 UTC by RomanCzerkies ♦4 |
| 175745403 (Comments: 1) | andwil (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wieder mal danke für's aufräumen meiner ganzen alten Hinweise. commented 2025-12-10 08:53:26 UTC by 0xb7767000 ♦19 |
 | 175603208 (Comments: 1) | Tracy08 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Tracy08, you have edited the building to cover the entire compound, but that is incorrect. The previous version was alright. commented 2025-12-10 08:47:46 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦114 |
| 174272561 (Comments: 5) | Kl90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've moved and connected the road, need resurvey there... commented 2025-12-10 08:44:04 UTC by Sanniu ♦586 |
| 175723454 (Comments: 4) | nave88 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello. Yes. Sorry. I reviewed the rest of your editions and are all ok. It seems was just a mistake. Summer time in Chile is touristic mappers time and we tend to encounter very bad mapping. Regards commented 2025-12-10 08:43:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175567912 (Comments: 4) | Hexalogical (Discussed changesets: 3) | It was deleted some ago I understand, unless someone redid it. I'll check. We deleted a los of those projects. Regards commented 2025-12-10 08:41:08 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 118387937 (Comments: 6) | h551w (Discussed changesets: 64) | Thanks for the help! I ended up going with shop=trade and trade=plumbing, since looking at the usage it seems that's commonly used for similar wholesale plumbing stores https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175747460 commented 2025-12-10 08:39:22 UTC by h551w ♦66 |
| 175745619 (Comments: 1) | Bente van Flitsmeister (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Bente, Op een G11 fietspad hoort geen motor_vehicle=no Dat geeft problemen met mofa (yes uiteraard ook niet) Ik heb het fietspad aangepast naar G11 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-10 08:39:10 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174206665 (Comments: 1) | alan1209 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Bürgerradweg, könnte man noch als "description" ergänzen. commented 2025-12-10 08:37:53 UTC by chris66 ♦427 |
| 174331895 (Comments: 1) | lorenzo2002 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ma è chiusa a scendere dall'autostrada? commented 2025-12-10 08:34:33 UTC by sabas88 ♦197 |
| 175746466 (Comments: 1) | TeamUpNL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Is deze Engelse naam werkelijk de officiële naam van het veldje? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 175742444 (Comments: 1) | osm-club (Discussed changesets: 1) | It clearly states ‘can’ and not ‘must’. Note that there must always be a four-digit year for the possible end date, so that the end date is always (!) clearly recognisable. Historical special regulations should be aban... commented 2025-12-10 08:26:04 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175746347 (Comments: 1) | JEKleine (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag JE Het 'park' heb ik omgezet naar een voetgangersgebied met een grasveldje. Dit is geen park in de zin van... MVG eggie commented 2025-12-10 08:23:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175731252 (Comments: 2) | IRIRIiiii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please cease trying to map imaginary dams. OSM is not the place do do classroom project. We only map features that actually exist on the ground commented 2025-12-10 08:22:00 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 174396704 (Comments: 11) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 119) | > Еми нямат 4 стени и не приличат особено на други сгради... Факт, но ние ги отбелязваме с building=roof (: Може да се нарече и извъгабарит... commented 2025-12-10 08:17:29 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦754 |
| 165025768 (Comments: 2) | flamezingel (Discussed changesets: 8) | 您好，您的这笔编辑中将一些建筑改成了商务区，而将原有的建筑标签删去了，这不太合适。 commented 2025-12-10 08:15:53 UTC by 真中あお ♦36 |
| 175746185 (Comments: 1) | JEKleine (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-10 08:15:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175701265 (Comments: 2) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Mapped an early version. commented 2025-12-10 08:14:40 UTC by nevw ♦2,089 |
| 175447146 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:13:19 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175447131 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:13:14 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175447122 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:13:10 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175447117 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:13:06 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175447101 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:13:02 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175447090 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:12:58 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175673540 (Comments: 5) | Wim Pruij (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke Tjuro, Ik heb moped en mofa=yes ook nog toegevoegd. Groet, eggie commented 2025-12-10 08:12:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175447082 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:12:55 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175447067 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:12:50 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175447012 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:12:46 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175446990 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553 commented 2025-12-10 08:12:40 UTC by MarcoR ♦544 |
| 175659151 (Comments: 4) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 113) | Dokładnie tak. commented 2025-12-10 08:05:15 UTC by Interswd ♦39 |
| 175481324 (Comments: 2) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour, ah oui, j'ai mis comme titre pour toutes les modifs sur ce parc interdit aux vélos, mais ce tronçon seul ne l'est pas, présence du panneau B7b devant puis présence du panneau avec vélo interdit su... commented 2025-12-10 07:56:41 UTC by Yasmina Bendik ♦4 |
| 146668065 (Comments: 1) | Alpacaman12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted with respect to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10869007405 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746073 commented 2025-12-10 07:48:09 UTC by yelisey90 ♦214 |
| 175745655 (Comments: 1) | Anonim 777 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-10 07:41:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175688859 (Comments: 4) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 44) | Bonjour, Je connais bien l'erreur officielle du GWR pour cet endroit puisque je l'ai consulté lors de ma première contribution en mars 2023 avant de constater l'erreur et l'aller sur le terrain. GWR dit aus... commented 2025-12-10 07:30:17 UTC by Marc_ch ♦292 |
| 165062117 (Comments: 2) | flamezingel (Discussed changesets: 8) | 以及，如果一条路兼具机动车道与非机动车道功能，应当通过同一条线上加多个标签来体现 commented 2025-12-10 06:59:22 UTC by 真中あお ♦36 |
| 125041175 (Comments: 4) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks for your feedback. Guido commented 2025-12-10 06:46:54 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 168849430 (Comments: 1) | serjiosann (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi serjiosann, this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=37.28417&lat=46.92550&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overl... commented 2025-12-10 06:44:45 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 175428417 (Comments: 3) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for your quick response. Guido commented 2025-12-10 06:28:01 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 175330804 (Comments: 3) | civ2mapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke für deine Rückmeldung. Guido commented 2025-12-10 06:26:28 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 165028587 (Comments: 2) | flamezingel (Discussed changesets: 8) | wiki.openstreetmap.org （之前的评论对超链接的识别有问题，这里补一条） commented 2025-12-10 06:16:17 UTC by 真中あお ♦36 |
| 175556265 (Comments: 1) | DeliaMappy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, all footprints you added here represent buildings , but they are generally oversized which has led to two of them overlapping. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimate... commented 2025-12-10 06:06:43 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175550515 (Comments: 1) | Nicole5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, All footprints you mapped here represent buidlings, but they could be more accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Z... commented 2025-12-10 06:04:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 137436031 (Comments: 2) | opendcc (Discussed changesets: 143) | Its a typo - springy. fixed commented 2025-12-10 05:54:44 UTC by opendcc ♦1,553 |
| 175708624 (Comments: 1) | MarkusErnstDI (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think this footprint represented a building, so it's deletion was incorrect, but don't worry I restored it. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience ... commented 2025-12-10 05:52:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175620562 (Comments: 1) | Tereza Srnečková (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for making the effort to improve existing map data. Some of the buildings you mapped are slightly oversized. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I r... commented 2025-12-10 05:45:05 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 102953868 (Comments: 1) | Alan Bragg (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hi, it looks like something went wrong here because you renamed tons of buildings on this road to "Lighthouse Hill Road" and you also renamed some random road far away to "Lighthouse Hill Road". The road name was later fixed but t... commented 2025-12-10 05:34:13 UTC by jm428 ♦23 |
| 175017365 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 405) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name#Date_ranges "When only ranges of years are specified (no month or other details), a single hyphen may be used, such as `old_name:1953-1990 = Ernst-Thälmann-Straße`. When f... commented 2025-12-10 05:23:11 UTC by osm-club ♦1 |
| 71057389 (Comments: 3) | miffy (Discussed changesets: 1) | playground=swing Is it fixed as above? Please confirm if you can. Sorry if I made any mistakes since it's been a while since I edited. commented 2025-12-10 05:09:55 UTC by miffy ♦1 |
| 175737696 (Comments: 1) | 의왕ICD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19144 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742065 commented 2025-12-10 05:06:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175741501 (Comments: 1) | msleegood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19143 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742043 commented 2025-12-10 05:04:41 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175741488 (Comments: 1) | 조폐공사ID본부 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19142 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742031 commented 2025-12-10 05:04:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175741231 (Comments: 1) | 조폐공사ID본부 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19142 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742031 commented 2025-12-10 05:04:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175741437 (Comments: 1) | heavenier (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19141 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742020 commented 2025-12-10 05:03:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175741706 (Comments: 1) | heavenier (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19141 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742020 commented 2025-12-10 05:03:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175472078 (Comments: 2) | tkotnala_lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Baloo Uriza, My name is Tanya, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for your insight! It was not a misspelling. There are different approaches on the OSM for adding turn:lanes. Our general approach is to add l... commented 2025-12-10 04:08:16 UTC by tkotnala_lyft ♦8 |
| 175708739 (Comments: 1) | helmutwaldschmidt (Discussed changesets: 1) | All buildings here are valid but the square ones in particular are slightly oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoo... commented 2025-12-10 03:38:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175630638 (Comments: 3) | coffee1413 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Awesome! commented 2025-12-10 03:37:22 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175720838 (Comments: 1) | fivehe (Discussed changesets: 2) | FYI - your email bounces when I sent a message. commented 2025-12-10 03:15:16 UTC by Glassman ♦5,651 |
| 175721704 (Comments: 2) | fivehe (Discussed changesets: 2) | I was surprised to find that Mapbox was more current than even the latest ESRI World Imagery around me when looking at this edit. commented 2025-12-10 03:14:47 UTC by Glassman ♦5,651 |
| 173282757 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 9) | why did you make Tiree bilingual? more than 50% of islanders speak Gaelic commented 2025-12-10 03:14:38 UTC by jSeke ♦15 |
| 175703312 (Comments: 1) | green_leek (Discussed changesets: 41) | also for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573748608 I think it's simpler to omit turn:lanes=*. Because in general the way within the intersection may be used by different vehicles coming from different directions and the turn:lanes usually only... commented 2025-12-10 03:01:53 UTC by aharvey ♦1,900 |
| 175637574 (Comments: 2) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello, I found this place as part of my cleanup of wrong or weird tags, in this case related to golf. The node that was supposed to be the pin was tagged golf=pin;tee, which obviously doesn't make sense, so I moved over the tee part to the c... commented 2025-12-10 02:54:44 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦43 |
| 175602360 (Comments: 4) | green_leek (Discussed changesets: 41) | only one lane from Russel Av can turn right into Forest Way. commented 2025-12-10 02:53:16 UTC by aharvey ♦1,900 |
| 175703599 (Comments: 1) | green_leek (Discussed changesets: 41) | should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288405561/history really have a turn:lanes tagged? given there's no markings once you enter the intersection and the way is used by both traffic going straight/right from Ferguson into the intersection, b... commented 2025-12-10 02:45:09 UTC by aharvey ♦1,900 |
| 154793219 (Comments: 2) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi! Thanks as always, should not be garden and will fix shortly. To be sure, are you aware of any better fit for a business that only sells dirt, soil and groundcovers? There are several similar such places around this area. I'm t... commented 2025-12-10 02:39:45 UTC by shinterro ♦10 |
| 175738447 (Comments: 1) | MrAtoz (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think all footprins here represent buildings, but some are slightly oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out t... commented 2025-12-10 02:27:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175731908 (Comments: 1) | HermannFries (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think all these footprints represent buildings, and generally their shape is accurate, well done. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you... commented 2025-12-10 02:02:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175733958 (Comments: 2) | GumUlf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tack för tipset Anders! commented 2025-12-10 01:38:48 UTC by GumUlf ♦1 |
| 175737446 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 22) | This changeset did not disconnect the node of the road from the administrative boundary as I thought it would. Instead, it moved the node back to its previous position along with the administrative boundary. The node of the road was actually disconne... commented 2025-12-10 01:32:25 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175734333 (Comments: 1) | Lance Palpallatoc FPG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Can you explain what you are trying to do in this edit, so we can help? Adding address tags to the road is probably not the way to do it commented 2025-12-10 00:40:27 UTC by citrula ♦975 |
| 175734858 (Comments: 1) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 5) | Podobnie jak w poprzedniej edycji 175734304 nie widzę podstaw do zmiany klasyfikacji dróg na unclassified. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175734858 commented 2025-12-10 00:28:09 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦577 |
| 175734304 (Comments: 1) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 5) | Możesz podać czym się kierowałeś zmieniając klasyfikację tej drogi z track na unclassified ? Patrząc na orto to nie jest nawet residential i nawet ciężko byłoby ją uznać za service. --- ... commented 2025-12-10 00:24:44 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦577 |
| 174455561 (Comments: 4) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 621) | Usunąłem punkt Tauron Obsługa Klienta i teraz jest ok. commented 2025-12-10 00:08:37 UTC by maro21 ♦783 |
| 175572719 (Comments: 1) | Csabi532 (Discussed changesets: 2) | A 2-es vonal eddig is elég pontos volt. Milyen pontosítás volt indokolt a te véleményed szerint? commented 2025-12-10 00:05:06 UTC by balint36 ♦219 |
| 173672878 (Comments: 1) | Csabi532 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hogyha fornettit töröltél, Piliscsabára hogy került "Máv személyszállítási zrt." operator és "Máv 2" network? commented 2025-12-10 00:04:18 UTC by balint36 ♦219 |
| 175727585 (Comments: 1) | Llamaben54 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there, can you please make your changeset comments more descriptive? 99% of your changeset comments are just "accuracy updates" which tells us nothing about what you've actually done. commented 2025-12-09 23:58:29 UTC by democat ♦10 |
| 129425915 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 22) | One node adjusted in this changeset has been reverted in Changeset 175737446. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175737446 commented 2025-12-09 23:58:26 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175724425 (Comments: 1) | Ebbsfleet Mapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks again. commented 2025-12-09 23:42:38 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175642124 (Comments: 1) | jajanja3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | These are bus lanes, which are mapped using tags on the road. Don't add pretend roads where no physical separation exists between lanes and don't add fictitious guided busways anywhere, ever. commented 2025-12-09 23:38:46 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175381980 (Comments: 1) | Benny21815 (Discussed changesets: 12) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455348653 Please don't share the nodes of the green if you have the fairway surrounding the green. If you can't see any fringe around the green, you should make the fairway butt up to the green ... commented 2025-12-09 23:36:44 UTC by b-jazz ♦776 |
| 175713032 (Comments: 1) | meongseolin (Discussed changesets: 42) | 道路关系的名称不要加城市名 commented 2025-12-09 23:35:24 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦26 |
| 175641026 (Comments: 1) | jajanja3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | It isn't a bus guideway. Even on real ones, the guided section doesn't extend into bus stattions. commented 2025-12-09 23:34:35 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175735876 (Comments: 1) | JMGonk (Discussed changesets: 5) | Should have included with my change comment: there is still a lot of work to be done on O-day'min Park and its connections, I just wanted to quickly get the shape and condition of it up to date. commented 2025-12-09 23:33:09 UTC by JMGonk ♦5 |
| 167110577 (Comments: 2) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 304) | Tak, mogę poprawić, dodawałem z głowy. commented 2025-12-09 23:32:22 UTC by maro21 ♦783 |
| 175640978 (Comments: 1) | jajanja3 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Please don't tag for the renderer. It's a bus rapid transit scheme, not a guided busway. commented 2025-12-09 23:32:02 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175637771 (Comments: 2) | Sander Sõnaj (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you! Sorry again for the confusion. commented 2025-12-09 23:31:33 UTC by Sander Sõnaj ♦1 |
| 96863484 (Comments: 1) | torvi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola, ¿podría pasarte por esta nota y aportar algo de información? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5084565 Un saludo. commented 2025-12-09 23:31:23 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦362 |
| 163749756 (Comments: 1) | Nathan Hart Realtor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, sharing some feedback on these additions. "Commerce City North" as it's described is a named place encompassing a large area with many different land uses. I can see it's defined as a subarea of Commerce City but does not have... commented 2025-12-09 23:31:18 UTC by jandar22 ♦34 |
| 175724479 (Comments: 1) | Ebbsfleet Mapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for spotting and correcting that. I think the earlier mapper misused highway=bus_guideway because it's rendered on the "default" OSM Carto map style and the correct highway=busway unfortu... commented 2025-12-09 23:30:47 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 172251519 (Comments: 2) | Szpic (Discussed changesets: 7) | Cześć, proszę nie rozdzielaj pasów ruchu na osobne linie, poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175737053 commented 2025-12-09 23:30:18 UTC by stasiu512 ♦208 |
| 175548358 (Comments: 4) | janiec67 (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175737067 commented 2025-12-09 23:30:13 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175674329 (Comments: 2) | janiec67 (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175737067 commented 2025-12-09 23:30:13 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175733520 (Comments: 4) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 67) | oh yeah, thx 🦀, fixed commented 2025-12-09 23:23:39 UTC by Yog Sot ♦373 |
| 175564707 (Comments: 2) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 4) | That is a really good resource, actually. I think I stumbled upon it in the past, but never really knew how to use it. Thank you! My next edit is in this area still, so I will correct it before publishing that edit. commented 2025-12-09 23:22:15 UTC by Clairness ♦3 |
| 175358831 (Comments: 2) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Ich habe jetzt die Attribute entfernt, die für einen Fahrradparkplatz passend waren, aber nicht für einen PKW-Parkplatz. commented 2025-12-09 23:18:20 UTC by george1201 ♦251 |
| 175736361 (Comments: 1) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 173) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13364194980 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-12-09 23:13:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 149072932 (Comments: 4) | Malý hajzl (Discussed changesets: 6) | 2) Já tama nejezdím, ale tamní řidiči budou nadávat, že je to tahá přes benzínku a ne po cestě. Za mě to je na příjezdovou cestu nebo parkovací uličku, které jsou při oddá... commented 2025-12-09 23:08:21 UTC by Malý hajzl ♦12 |
| 175692652 (Comments: 2) | Caleb NHVR (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you, I didn't notice I accidentally copied those Route Masters over onto the roundabout. Cheers :) commented 2025-12-09 23:07:18 UTC by Caleb NHVR ♦13 |
| 174487616 (Comments: 2) | AdrenoBear (Discussed changesets: 1) | For the record: since I was at Baptist today I went ahead and adjusted the positions and directions of the Flock cameras in changeset #175736164, so no need to worry about that anymore. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2025-12-09 22:53:23 UTC by Kinsio ♦25 |
| 175735896 (Comments: 2) | PrzeKo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-12-09 22:53:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175725843 (Comments: 1) | elscada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nazwa została usunięta: nie dodajemy nazw prywatnych podjazdów commented 2025-12-09 22:46:35 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 173568035 (Comments: 2) | coffeecong (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19139 commented 2025-12-09 22:43:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175704648 (Comments: 1) | Vooitee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175736095 Tam jest chyba przebudowa i zdjęcia lotnicze są nieaktualne commented 2025-12-09 22:43:06 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175732573 (Comments: 4) | Dd123454321 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yeah, I see this is a block. addr:housenumber=* tag is both used for number of apartment blocks in a neighbourhood and for number of houses(as well as for other types of buildings if applicable). For example: addr:place=Надежда+addr:housenu... commented 2025-12-09 22:39:03 UTC by Fraxi ♦198 |
| 175702010 (Comments: 1) | bjnk954 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-09 22:32:26 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 160086129 (Comments: 7) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 28) | name:etymology=Q26198 (et non Q31657399 ?) Car le nom est d'après le nom local de la corneille noire si j'ai bien compris. Tout personne ayant un compte Wikipedia peut modifier un wikidata (aussi sans comme Wikipedia, mais c'... commented 2025-12-09 21:48:15 UTC by trial ♦996 |
| 175685898 (Comments: 3) | PierZen (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hello! It does not make sense to use two keys for the same function. Incidentally, the documented key is order:strahler (see https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=strahler). Bonjour ! Il n'est pas judicieux d'utiliser deux clés po... commented 2025-12-09 21:45:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175687954 (Comments: 1) | cabinetcourbi (Discussed changesets: 12) | je pense qu'il reste des scories comme source=yahoo Si vous coupez le bois au sud (bien), autant faire de même au nord. commented 2025-12-09 21:18:01 UTC by trial ♦996 |
| 175726662 (Comments: 1) | pieterjanvz (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bij highway=footway laten we bicycle=no weg, die is impliciet. commented 2025-12-09 21:11:34 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦697 |
| 175601410 (Comments: 3) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 107) | A bo się nieco źle skopiowało. Poprawie przy następnej sesji mapowania. commented 2025-12-09 21:07:23 UTC by Yunkers ♦405 |
| 175688063 (Comments: 1) | JLZIMMERMANN (Discussed changesets: 54) | ZIMMMY pris en flagrant délit d'utiliser une vieille imagerie ! La note 5080307 c'était pour dire que le parking à 3 niveaux était opérationnel pas qu'ils avaient tout cassé et remis l'... commented 2025-12-09 21:05:07 UTC by trial ♦996 |
| 175258409 (Comments: 6) | Autopistero20502020 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Aparte de eliminar la relación que habías duplicado, también cambié posteriormente el valor de la wikidata a la que apuntaba la relación antigua. Se puede ver aquí: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1406... commented 2025-12-09 21:04:14 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦232 |
| 175728178 (Comments: 1) | zocu06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pequeño error que he tenido: Level cut sevilla no está añadido commented 2025-12-09 20:55:56 UTC by zocu06 ♦1 |
| 175710110 (Comments: 2) | ole van ravesteyn (Discussed changesets: 2) | De brug heb ik uit z'n isolement gehaald. commented 2025-12-09 20:47:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175685939 (Comments: 3) | PierZen (Discussed changesets: 40) | Ah right. There is already a tag for this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:order:strahler commented 2025-12-09 20:45:15 UTC by mueschel ♦6,754 |
| 171266290 (Comments: 3) | MikeHameln (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich hab es geändert. Laut Strava auch deutliche Nutzung zu Fuß. Lage angepasst. Namen -> Beschreibung. commented 2025-12-09 20:30:17 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,453 |
| 174394102 (Comments: 2) | multimodaal (Discussed changesets: 85) | Hoi, je hebt helemaal gelijk, bedankt voor je opmerkzaamheid! Zal het corrigeren zodra ik weer achter de computer zit. Groeten commented 2025-12-09 20:21:25 UTC by multimodaal ♦271 |
| 175718815 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 908) | thx commented 2025-12-09 20:02:11 UTC by Yog Sot ♦373 |
| 175729155 (Comments: 1) | Jonas001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! Maybe half of the footprints you added here represent buildings. Layer tags should only be used for intersections of data where one feature has a relative vertical position to another... commented 2025-12-09 20:01:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 165982506 (Comments: 2) | Maplev (Discussed changesets: 3) | Być może faktycznie lepiej by to pasowało. Nie byłem dokładnie pewien, jakich znaczników użyć, a znaleziony na wiki "information=route_marker" wydawał się wtedy "optymalny". Ruszałem ten węzeł tylko dlatego, że... commented 2025-12-09 20:00:53 UTC by Maplev ♦13 |
| 175727532 (Comments: 1) | bkleipool (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag bkleipool, Lijkt me oke zo. Wanneer het priveterrein betreft wellicht access=permissive MVG eggie commented 2025-12-09 19:53:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 171657959 (Comments: 1) | Krzysiek5757 (Discussed changesets: 1) | czemu została relacja T1 włączona do route_master linii T4? commented 2025-12-09 19:46:27 UTC by dzamper ♦176 |
| 175722712 (Comments: 2) | Maikher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adres aangevuld commented 2025-12-09 19:42:39 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 173567924 (Comments: 1) | coffeecong (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175728513 - please do not delete military base features, they are added from normal aerial imagery and do not contain secret or sensitive information. commented 2025-12-09 19:38:42 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦144 |
| 175717076 (Comments: 3) | bpaulson75fb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gotcha. Thanks for updating them! commented 2025-12-09 19:22:41 UTC by iandees ♦760 |
| 167095008 (Comments: 2) | Toni Serra (Discussed changesets: 88) | Its a mistake. Fixed. Thank you commented 2025-12-09 19:19:33 UTC by Toni Serra ♦10 |
| 175637236 (Comments: 4) | benguuuuu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks. Yeah, I've been cleaning up golf courses over the last 3 years in hopes that people won't see these bad habits and spread them around farther. commented 2025-12-09 19:15:57 UTC by b-jazz ♦776 |
| 173613850 (Comments: 4) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 125) | "Слатинска/Slatinska" commented 2025-12-09 19:12:17 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦754 |
| 174445353 (Comments: 1) | lllxlll (Discussed changesets: 2) | Тег motor_vehicle=no означает либо физическую невозможность проезда на автотранспорте, либо запрет на проезд для всех. Через ворота, фигурирующ... commented 2025-12-09 18:58:59 UTC by LateGuest ♦4 |
| 175727240 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 123) | Nie tyle instytucje, co wszystkie budynki w obu obszarach. commented 2025-12-09 18:44:08 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦321 |
| 164397285 (Comments: 2) | mikini (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Mateusz, Thank you for the attention. I don't recall deliberately choosing that scheme or having studied the differences and controversies between repair=yes, *:repair=yes and service:*:repair=yes before. My hunch was therefo... commented 2025-12-09 18:14:38 UTC by mikini ♦61 |
| 175719141 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 9) | why is this changeset so wide commented 2025-12-09 18:13:23 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
| 175720666 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 9) | why is this changeset so wide commented 2025-12-09 18:13:18 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
| 175722244 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 9) | why is this changeset so wide commented 2025-12-09 18:13:11 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
| 175724103 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 9) | why is this changeset so wide commented 2025-12-09 18:13:04 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
| 175725876 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 9) | why is this changeset so wide commented 2025-12-09 18:12:59 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
| X | 175706306 (Comments: 1) | f_husni (Discussed changesets: 6) | please try to keep edits like this to a single region commented 2025-12-09 18:11:34 UTC by dmjab13 ♦62 |
| 175724899 (Comments: 1) | kapazao_import (Discussed changesets: 37) | Quien dice unmarked quería decir uncontrolled :) commented 2025-12-09 18:07:59 UTC by kapazao ♦954 |
| 165010324 (Comments: 2) | MonsterKlaus (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello Mateusz Yes, this is a typo. Thanks for picking it up. I corrected it already. Kind regards Klaus commented 2025-12-09 18:05:21 UTC by MonsterKlaus ♦17 |
| 175700367 (Comments: 1) | leomereuze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonsoir et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! Vos trois "changesets" comportent quelques éléments qui me questionnent : - Le "Chemin la villa Toucou" a-t-il vraiment ce nom sur le terrain ? Ou est-ce un no... commented 2025-12-09 18:01:08 UTC by K12230LF ♦44 |
| 175709868 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 204) | quepasaweb.com.ar/cambiaron-el-sentido-de-dos-importantes-calles-de-martinez/ commented 2025-12-09 17:56:29 UTC by i2004 ♦173 |
| 175090096 (Comments: 3) | Matija Nalis (Discussed changesets: 9) | Sorry, I don't have local knowledge of this area, I just looked at the imagery. Please fix it from your sources. Thanks commented 2025-12-09 17:53:18 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,750 |
| 175501870 (Comments: 1) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | The parking lot layout has since changed and the "missing road" has been removed since the aerial imagery was taken! I'll revert the changes back. :) This was surveyed in person yesterday. Construction is changing stuff around here rea... commented 2025-12-09 17:51:11 UTC by justinsenemy ♦1 |
| 175218318 (Comments: 19) | Dodko (Discussed changesets: 41) | Super, to je pekne, ze sa tam da zadat aj datum jazdy. OsmAnd to tiez podporuje, odskusam to teda po 21.12, ci zvlada aj tuto invertovanu verziu znaciek. commented 2025-12-09 17:50:28 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,750 |
| 175306813 (Comments: 2) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo Joachim, wirst du hier aktiv ? Ich würde sonst die website-Einträge entfernen. Es sind POI-unspezifische Einträge einer privaten umap. Grüße Limes commented 2025-12-09 17:50:03 UTC by limes11 ♦973 |
| 146819598 (Comments: 3) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 64) | Ano ten bod som opravil, dakujem za posun aj tej dalsej pripajajucej sa cesty. Cesty by sa mali spojit do jednej kde konci fyzicka zabrana a srafovanie. Plna ciara uz nie, tam staci jedna OSM cesta pre oba smery. commented 2025-12-09 17:48:20 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,750 |
| 174841444 (Comments: 2) | Trailspotting (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for spotting it. I fixed this and checked my other adjacent edits also. commented 2025-12-09 17:48:17 UTC by Trailspotting ♦1 |
| 175724073 (Comments: 1) | bkreegs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Remember to expand road directions/prefixes in the name. e.g. W 78th should be West 78th. commented 2025-12-09 17:38:30 UTC by iandees ♦760 |
| 175448904 (Comments: 2) | Cortix (Discussed changesets: 11) | Status proposed appena aggiornato: https://sentieromedamontorfano.it/sentiero-da-meda-a-montorfano-lungo-la-valle-del-seveso/ commented 2025-12-09 17:31:33 UTC by Cortix ♦19 |
| 173299531 (Comments: 1) | TheBestIdea (Discussed changesets: 71) | Hi, what street-level imagery was used to observe the Bailey Avenue protected bike lane? I am primarily trying to understand the designated bicycle routing through the intersection with W 230th St. commented 2025-12-09 17:18:54 UTC by valaise ♦20 |
| 175640984 (Comments: 2) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 92) | Oh sorry, I didn't now this. Next time I work my list place by place only, without changing the location. commented 2025-12-09 17:12:36 UTC by 5R-MFT ♦79 |
| 173251568 (Comments: 2) | Hamilcar117 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Guido, OMG, what have I done ! ^^ My finger obviously slipped on the screen and I didn't realise my mistake. I will fix this right now. Thank you for your message. Kind regards, Hamilcar commented 2025-12-09 17:04:56 UTC by Hamilcar117 ♦1 |
| 175722857 (Comments: 2) | Hung159 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ok bạn, mình sẽ sửa lại, mình nghĩ là tất cả đường tỉnh sẽ gắn thẻ primary, mình sẽ khắc phục sửa thành secondary commented 2025-12-09 17:04:28 UTC by Hung159 ♦4 |
| 166048623 (Comments: 1) | acidyellow (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used material=stonech on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12824696513/history Have you maybe meant material=stone ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2025-12-09 17:04:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 117258299 (Comments: 1) | CraigPrusansky (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028703303/history has roof:type = pyramidal that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=pyramidal was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape commented 2025-12-09 17:04:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 173318412 (Comments: 2) | javbw (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks! Repaired. commented 2025-12-09 17:01:03 UTC by javbw ♦41 |
| 172843092 (Comments: 5) | bernward1 (Discussed changesets: 17) | I don't know it. I only know that the grade changed on the way when I walked there along to add the missing ways to OSM. I added the grades to the way, because the one part to the shelter has grade1-2 and the other 4. So you can descide which... commented 2025-12-09 16:55:29 UTC by bernward1 ♦23 |
| 173646888 (Comments: 9) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 27) | Wycięto drzewa na południe od garaży. Byłem tam dzisiaj. Na OSM było zmapowanych ponad 30 drzew. Już ich nie ma. Uaktualniłem OSM. commented 2025-12-09 16:49:08 UTC by Las Wolski ♦11 |
| 175722031 (Comments: 3) | ppkonings (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #175722662 commented 2025-12-09 16:45:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175233473 (Comments: 2) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 170) | There’s a marking at the beginning of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454396610 that says “TUGS ONLY”. I believe it refers to the kind of vehicle that pulls an airplane around, also known as a pushback tractor. [1] This is in con... commented 2025-12-09 16:43:50 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦592 |
| 175665305 (Comments: 5) | SammysHP (Discussed changesets: 5) | o.k, cool commented 2025-12-09 16:39:45 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,453 |
| 162898411 (Comments: 1) | ESándor (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12616054983/history has shop = building_material that was added in this edit shop=building_material ? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... commented 2025-12-09 16:35:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
 | 172364346 (Comments: 1) | Kosava87 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13166014301/history has shop = building_material that was added in this edit shop=building_material ? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... commented 2025-12-09 16:35:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 174252087 (Comments: 4) | Cortix (Discussed changesets: 11) | Del sentiero Me Mo sempre preso da un KLM di Google sul sito https://sentieromedamontorfano.it/mappa/ , aspettiamo liberatoria in quanto coperto da Copyright. commented 2025-12-09 16:23:00 UTC by Angelo Giuseppe ♦21 |
| 170685780 (Comments: 1) | TeresaKaz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used material=metalb on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13082351708/history Have you maybe meant material=metal ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2025-12-09 16:20:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175713639 (Comments: 1) | GroZou13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The museum has already been added to OSM, but only 2 months ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13256051041 commented 2025-12-09 16:16:06 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 174991982 (Comments: 2) | pancaldi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ok. Grazie commented 2025-12-09 16:11:45 UTC by pancaldi ♦3 |
| 169215878 (Comments: 1) | sannkc (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! You used material=rockv on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364000905/history Have you maybe meant material=rock ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2025-12-09 16:03:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 169213532 (Comments: 1) | sannkc (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! You used material=rockv on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363983208/history Have you maybe meant material=rock ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2025-12-09 16:03:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 166545579 (Comments: 1) | ryunezm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used sport=futsal;w on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118461114/history Have you maybe meant sport=futsal ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2025-12-09 15:58:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175705625 (Comments: 1) | Mamutinka (Discussed changesets: 100) | you sure it's supposed ot be this way? xD commented 2025-12-09 15:57:17 UTC by Yog Sot ♦373 |
| 84500704 (Comments: 4) | ferpg81 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, como veas mejor. Hace mucho que hice esto, pero la relación seguramente incluiría los elementos que vienen siendo parte en cualquier hidroeléctrica (incluyendo la presa), creo que venía más o menos bien explicad... commented 2025-12-09 15:54:06 UTC by ferpg81 ♦3 |
| 168738238 (Comments: 2) | civ41 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Mateusz, thank you, yes that was a typo, fixed now. Regards commented 2025-12-09 15:53:24 UTC by civ41 ♦15 |
 | 167385941 (Comments: 1) | Piicharpa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Piicharpa, this chaangeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersection lines and overlapping ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=106.66801&lat=17.21467&zoom=14&base... commented 2025-12-09 15:40:56 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 175715622 (Comments: 1) | dark horse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus und willkommen bei OSM Ein kleiner Tipp: In OSM werden alle Namen ausgeschrieben, keine Abkürzungen: addr:street=Kirchenstr sollte addr:street=Kirchenstraße sein Gruß Toni commented 2025-12-09 15:39:17 UTC by ToniE ♦1,240 |
 | 165723165 (Comments: 1) | Hama Gardy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used cuisine=coffee_shop;f on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382999830/history Have you maybe meant cuisine=coffee_shop ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2025-12-09 15:38:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175700982 (Comments: 1) | rene78 (Discussed changesets: 120) | Kommentar zu Testwecken für https://github.com/rene78/latest-changes commented 2025-12-09 15:35:46 UTC by rene78 ♦466 |
| 173103568 (Comments: 1) | Hung159 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello, I am reaching out regarding some of the edits made in this changeset. Adding crossing tags to footway/footway crossings seems to go against OSM standards. Crossing nodes should be used where two paths intended for different modes of tr... commented 2025-12-09 15:35:41 UTC by VLD192 ♦8 |
| 175701128 (Comments: 2) | rene78 (Discussed changesets: 120) | Noch ein Kommentar zu Testzwecken. Jetzt kommen 2 Leerzeilen: Das sollte richtig gerendert werden. commented 2025-12-09 15:35:14 UTC by rene78 ♦466 |
 | 175702923 (Comments: 1) | Thomas H aus B (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Thomas H aus B, danke für deine Bearbeitungen mit Go Map!! Ein Hinweis zu diesem Änderungssatz: Obwohl der Kommentar „Korrektur Bruchstraße 52a“ auf eine lokale Änderung schließen lässt, enth&a... commented 2025-12-09 15:32:58 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,992 |
| 173591948 (Comments: 1) | Victor Dps (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bonjour, le chemin à Thun l'Eveque est bien devenu une voie verte ? commented 2025-12-09 15:24:45 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦185 |
| 175166686 (Comments: 2) | mango20 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ilmeisesti onnistuin siirtämään kaikkia relaatioon liitettyjä bussipysäkkejä himpun verran pohjoiseen samalla, kun poistin niitä relaatiosta. Kävin korjaamassa bussipysäkit oikeille paikoilleen. commented 2025-12-09 15:20:27 UTC by mango20 ♦2 |
| 156132352 (Comments: 3) | Jidée (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci beaucoup pour ton retour. et pas de soucis pour les erreurs, on en a tous fait :) moi aussi :) cela reste une amélioration très utile. Bonne continuation et si tu as des questions n'hésites pas à m'... commented 2025-12-09 15:19:47 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 175212741 (Comments: 2) | flamezingel (Discussed changesets: 8) | 根据osm规则，name键应填写当地常用语言的名称。因此，对于中国之内的事物，该键应该填写中文（而不是英文）。 如果想记录事物的英文名，可以填写在name:en键中。 另外，经调查，该... commented 2025-12-09 15:16:28 UTC by 真中あお ♦36 |
 | 175627647 (Comments: 2) | contrapunctus (Discussed changesets: 26) | You may have added wrong train number in 'ref=' tag of relation 19930474 [https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19930474] Please fix it if it is wrong otherwise please contact me if I am wrong. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-12-09 15:06:03 UTC by OSM Contributer ♦10 |
| 175680732 (Comments: 1) | 真中あお (Discussed changesets: 4) | 抱歉，变更集说明由于JOSM编辑器的自动补全填错了，请无视“延安大学”四个字。 commented 2025-12-09 15:03:27 UTC by 真中あお ♦36 |
| 175714297 (Comments: 1) | WereldBolt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag WB, Dit is inmiddels gereed dus aangepast. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.03722,4.333216,19/?datastrip=20251107_PNEO-04 Foto's zijn vaak 'outdated'. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-09 14:59:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175679041 (Comments: 4) | Katie Evers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thomas Road, do you mean the road way/18981395?.....YES THIS IS THE CORRECT ONE. commented 2025-12-09 14:59:28 UTC by Katie Evers ♦1 |
| 175650608 (Comments: 10) | karayama (Discussed changesets: 7) | 我再说一遍：所谓的telegram中国群里某几个人某一时商讨出来的所谓规则，并不是OSM规则——这里是Openstreetmap，不是Telegrammap。其次，中国法律法规和道路建设标准也十分明确，你所谓... commented 2025-12-09 14:58:13 UTC by karayama ♦4 |
| 175699721 (Comments: 1) | jaitin uhmguysss (Discussed changesets: 1) | This seems highly unlikely that a few miles of the Washita River were moved into a culvert. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175699721 commented 2025-12-09 14:57:01 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 172813579 (Comments: 1) | archiarch111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi archiarch111, welcome to OSM. Seems like you were experimenting with mapping here, but accidentally removed some of the tagging information. I fixed the issue for you. I encourage you to read more about OSM before making more edits: https://learno... commented 2025-12-09 14:47:20 UTC by quincylvania ♦71 |
| 175714012 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 570) | I removed the tunnel commented 2025-12-09 14:46:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175690295 (Comments: 1) | jetbridge guy (Discussed changesets: 1) | These name=* values should probably be ref=* instead --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175690295 commented 2025-12-09 14:46:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175712878 (Comments: 1) | Rita Agyeiwaa (Discussed changesets: 4) | This are is within an existing mapped residential area, thus it's not needed. I've removed it. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-09 14:42:28 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175711219 (Comments: 2) | drDerp (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je vraagt feedback.. Je zou ook het aantal verdiepingen kunnen toevoegen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels MVG eggie commented 2025-12-09 14:42:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175712583 (Comments: 1) | Rita Agyeiwaa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, The scool sports pitch would not be named Sports Center. I've made corrections. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-09 14:40:35 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175712215 (Comments: 1) | Rita Agyeiwaa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, The garden would not be named Parkview Road, and it doesn't need the area=yes tag. The tags should be access=private leisure=garden. I've made corrections. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-09 14:36:28 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175712751 (Comments: 1) | Weergavenaam2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-09 14:35:34 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174848943 (Comments: 1) | Jrachi (Discussed changesets: 101) | Concordo: https://it.wikiloc.com/percorsi-escursionismo/monte-barone-da-le-piane-di-coggiola-233717843/photo-139511893 commented 2025-12-09 14:34:40 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 175711277 (Comments: 1) | drDerp (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag drDerp, Probeer als het kan concreet commentaar te leveren bij upload. Dus wat heb je hier aangepast? MVG eggie commented 2025-12-09 14:32:46 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175711223 (Comments: 1) | Rita Agyeiwaa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. A few points, the house name would not be 51, that's only the house number. In the absence of a oneway=no tag, it is implied that the road is two-way; no need for that tag. I've made corre... commented 2025-12-09 14:31:39 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175535076 (Comments: 1) | Ali_Shahab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper. I am reviewing your mappings and am sorry to say that your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM. Too inaccurate mapping, buildings not squared, and used the wrong ta... commented 2025-12-09 14:24:54 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175673774 (Comments: 1) | mikki65 (Discussed changesets: 71) | Ho fatto il revert di questo changeset. Non c'è alcun ristorante che copre tutta quest'area che identificava tutto lo shopping centre. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2025-12-09 14:20:45 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 160348309 (Comments: 3) | Bender l'importateur (Discussed changesets: 21) | ah super merci, oui des fois la position est vraiment très éloignée des données ouvertes, j'ai vu jusqu'à 800 mètres de décalage v_v thanks! commented 2025-12-09 14:15:00 UTC by tykayn ♦23 |
| 175714916 (Comments: 1) | CHS3142 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. See my comment on your other changeset> Please do not cluster buildings as well. Best regards commented 2025-12-09 14:04:41 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 165820414 (Comments: 1) | Leonardozwei (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin Leonardo2, der JOSM validator bemängelt dein service=factory_road als "unüblich". Der Wert wurde auch laut taginfo bislang genau zweimal ausschließ0lich von dir verwendet. Falls du den sinnvoll findest, wäre es... commented 2025-12-09 14:03:04 UTC by urk ♦25 |
| 175712877 (Comments: 1) | Stu_Oz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175714422 Although a previous edit changing it to a guided busway was wrong, highway=busway is the correct tagging here. It was probably mis-tagged as a guided busway and keeps getting chang... commented 2025-12-09 14:01:00 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175669168 (Comments: 1) | CHS3142 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. See my comments on another changeset. Do you use a mouse ? If not, it is hardly impossible to map accurate. Best regards commented 2025-12-09 13:49:42 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175714355 (Comments: 1) | CHS3142 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. PLease refresh your mapping and tagging skills. Rather inaccurate mapped. Not squared. Buildings should be tagged as building=yes No landuse-residential. That tag is to be used to mark a settlement as residentia... commented 2025-12-09 13:46:31 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 166683200 (Comments: 11) | vakantieland dot nl (Discussed changesets: 39) | edited it then commented 2025-12-09 13:37:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 104677481 (Comments: 1) | Rienux (Discussed changesets: 21) | als je meerdere relaties wil onderbrengen in 1 relatie doe je dat best met de outer wegen te gebruiken ipv de relatie zelf (je hebt stappersven toegevoegd aan kalmthoutse heide) je zou ook kunnen denken dat je het zo hebt gedaan zodat de namen moo... commented 2025-12-09 13:32:50 UTC by Joske1020 ♦18 |
| 175704118 (Comments: 2) | dbsus (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo whb, ja, das ist so gedacht, siehe: https://www.bahnhof.de/heidelberg-orthopaedie (nach unten scrollen). Viele Grüße dbsus commented 2025-12-09 13:21:18 UTC by dbsus ♦14 |
 | 79073922 (Comments: 2) | Totor (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Matheusz, Not sure what I saw there 6 years ago, but I think I would have been happy with shop=beverages. Looking back at the picture, and by the name, it looks like they are actually selling Chicken=Manok (to cook/roast, or already roasted)... commented 2025-12-09 13:14:35 UTC by Totor ♦71 |
| 170027508 (Comments: 1) | JUAN ELIAS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used waste=organico on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13050896351/history Have you maybe meant waste=organic ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2025-12-09 13:14:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 169521768 (Comments: 1) | JUAN ELIAS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used waste=organico on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13027058628/history Have you maybe meant waste=organic ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2025-12-09 13:14:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 169519269 (Comments: 1) | JUAN ELIAS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used waste=organico on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13026981924/history Have you maybe meant waste=organic ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2025-12-09 13:14:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 41049291 (Comments: 1) | EräsHenkilö (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used playground=swingy on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4322187878/history Have you maybe meant playground=swing ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited s... commented 2025-12-09 13:14:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 62249558 (Comments: 1) | FabiB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used playground=swingy on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5878803556/history Have you maybe meant playground=swing ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited s... commented 2025-12-09 13:14:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 164117494 (Comments: 1) | Syk_Ossfin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used playground=swingy on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12702214080/history Have you maybe meant playground=swing ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2025-12-09 13:14:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 20032369 (Comments: 1) | seggione (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used playground=swingy on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2624601936/history Have you maybe meant playground=swing ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited s... commented 2025-12-09 13:13:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 171747379 (Comments: 1) | capt El Srako (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used water=wastewaterw on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428797542/history Have you maybe meant water=wastewater ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2025-12-09 13:13:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 130307076 (Comments: 1) | Vitor Hermenegildo Lobo de Vitor Lobo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123745517/history has shop = empresa_de_engenharia that was added in this edit shop=empresa_de_engenharia ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anyth... commented 2025-12-09 13:13:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 165709668 (Comments: 1) | R7K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used water=lake3 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382942103/history Have you maybe meant water=lake ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2025-12-09 13:13:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175547917 (Comments: 1) | MarinusdeB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. * Buildings should have their corners squared. B... commented 2025-12-09 13:13:08 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 170495032 (Comments: 1) | JRH50 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello! You used waterway=draine on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422463783/history Have you maybe meant waterway=drain ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2025-12-09 13:13:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 131151519 (Comments: 6) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 141) | also works, I guess commented 2025-12-09 13:12:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 162032777 (Comments: 1) | wheelopoli (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Do you mind if I turned Surau Nur Jihad point into mosque building? commented 2025-12-09 12:58:01 UTC by adlan2001 ♦6 |
| 175677375 (Comments: 2) | kartoittaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moikka, kiitos huomiosta ja pahoittelut mokasta! Mikä lie vahinkoklikkaus käynyt. Nyt pitäisi olla fiksattu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175712343 commented 2025-12-09 12:57:45 UTC by kartoittaa ♦1 |
| 175709687 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 204) | no entiendo los cambios commented 2025-12-09 12:57:28 UTC by i2004 ♦173 |
| 172062532 (Comments: 1) | EvelinaGas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is the whole of this building "Haanbaagasuteki"? I see other restaurants such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5215406428 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13062175201 mapped as nodes within the building. Why not do the sa... commented 2025-12-09 12:44:16 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 175695589 (Comments: 1) | youngbasedallah (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, just a heads up that on-street bike lanes may already be defined as part of the road, so creating cycle paths separate from them is a bit duplicative. commented 2025-12-09 12:43:38 UTC by ICT_maps ♦10 |
| 175704065 (Comments: 1) | Stu_Oz (Discussed changesets: 2) | It may not be a *guided* busway, but assuming that the "bus only" road markings clearly visible in aerial imagery at both ends are still current, the access tagging you'd want is: vehicle=no + bus=designated The tagging y... commented 2025-12-09 12:38:11 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 120142421 (Comments: 2) | windkraft-os (Discussed changesets: 25) | Ja. Da ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen. Das ändere ich direkt mal commented 2025-12-09 12:35:46 UTC by windkraft-os ♦13 |
| 138823886 (Comments: 3) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | Gracias, Leonardo. Los datos de OSM no son correctos sin los cambios mencionados en las relaciones route_master. Puedo modificar la lista CSV en la wiki de OSM si lo deseáis. Saludos también a los Trufistas y a Chri... commented 2025-12-09 12:26:39 UTC by ToniE ♦1,240 |
| 175709454 (Comments: 2) | Andijk (Discussed changesets: 5) | officetag toegevoegd commented 2025-12-09 12:24:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 172656813 (Comments: 2) | javbw (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks for catching this - yes it was a mistake 😅 I will fix it soon! commented 2025-12-09 12:24:32 UTC by javbw ♦41 |
| 175563322 (Comments: 6) | AF HAF KARTOGRAF (Discussed changesets: 27) | Yes, I still work on Prague districts, I will map 22 districts and 57 city parts (Prague has multilevel administrative division, and Czechia too, that's because I upgrade to highter admin levels). And when I done, I update Czechia admin levels o... commented 2025-12-09 12:23:50 UTC by AF HAF KARTOGRAF ♦67 |
| 175654529 (Comments: 2) | pinky1974 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Mi scuso, è corretto il civico 32, ho segnato il fabbricato sbagliato commented 2025-12-09 12:19:07 UTC by pinky1974 ♦3 |
| 175654739 (Comments: 2) | pinky1974 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Si, ma anche conosciuto come Ferragosto Andornese commented 2025-12-09 12:17:52 UTC by pinky1974 ♦3 |
| 175683223 (Comments: 2) | pinky1974 (Discussed changesets: 5) | È giardino e piccolo parco giochi commented 2025-12-09 12:17:04 UTC by pinky1974 ♦3 |
| 175708256 (Comments: 1) | Diginox (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Diginox De naam ontbreekt? name=???? MVG eggie commented 2025-12-09 12:15:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175650633 (Comments: 2) | GOwin (Discussed changesets: 84) | Your observation is correct and noted. Thanks. commented 2025-12-09 12:15:44 UTC by GOwin ♦861 |
| 175708089 (Comments: 1) | Diginox (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-09 12:14:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175667797 (Comments: 7) | Aya Samir (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thank you commented 2025-12-09 12:08:12 UTC by Aya Samir ♦38 |
 | 175669888 (Comments: 1) | Gichuki2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | good commented 2025-12-09 12:07:41 UTC by Gichuki2025 ♦1 |
| 175710217 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 405) | https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/351_all.osm.zip and https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/missing/351.geojson, too... commented 2025-12-09 12:05:44 UTC by habi ♦1,981 |
| 175535897 (Comments: 1) | lukiliku (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please tag buildings as building=yes . This is default for HOTOSM mappings. More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped: * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Bu... commented 2025-12-09 11:44:50 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 170129445 (Comments: 2) | homer__simpsons (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello, merci de la remarque, j'ai corrigé le tag manquant (ainsi que le tag) avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175709334 commented 2025-12-09 11:44:37 UTC by homer__simpsons ♦16 |
| 163202493 (Comments: 7) | GA Kolbermoor (Discussed changesets: 1) | besser gesagt nicht Weg sondern Pfad commented 2025-12-09 11:40:52 UTC by GA Kolbermoor ♦1 |
| 175610269 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 91) | Hi, thanks for pointing that out, I forgot to move that to addr:suburb, now done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175709051 commented 2025-12-09 11:38:06 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦351 |
| 175677365 (Comments: 1) | pinky1974 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ciao. Il nome e' il nome proprio della feature, non un nome comune come colonnina di ricarica, parcheggio, giardino, ecc. Se non ha un nome, non si inserisce niente. Ciao, Andrea --- Published using ... commented 2025-12-09 11:21:48 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 175672767 (Comments: 1) | fg63 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1456925673. What is the mean of the tag état = ruine ? You cannot mean the etat key (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/etat), as it has different values. commented 2025-12-09 11:16:47 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
 | 175638239 (Comments: 2) | JanezPavelZebovec (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! It should ve 'ref:eid' (as I use elsewhere) and is ID of cultural heritage places of Slovenia government as indicated on https://geohub.gov.si/ghapp/giskd/. Thank you for warning. I will fix that. Do you have better suggestion on ... commented 2025-12-09 11:14:50 UTC by JanezPavelZebovec ♦17 |
| 175705243 (Comments: 1) | Leonrdev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. feedback.. office=it ? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-09 11:13:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175656223 (Comments: 2) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hallo, akino_germany, das erkläre ich gerne: Ich setze die Sackgasse, wenn von da aus (noch) kein Weg weiterführt, da im Inspector dort dann häufig ein "Snap Point" angezeigt wird. Das ist nicht wirklich schlimm, verbe... commented 2025-12-09 11:10:31 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦138 |
| 171889634 (Comments: 3) | caitnahc (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thank you for replying. Can you tell me more about the OSM project you participated in and share the instructions you received? There are no specific guidelines for Manchester, but there is general advice that these changes do not follo... commented 2025-12-09 11:07:20 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 149806530 (Comments: 2) | jvaclavik (Discussed changesets: 4) | You are right. Fixed. Thanks! commented 2025-12-09 11:05:05 UTC by jvaclavik ♦2 |
| 175559356 (Comments: 4) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 24) | Vielen Dank :) commented 2025-12-09 10:48:35 UTC by akino_germany ♦23 |
| 173685744 (Comments: 2) | Fred_OSM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Done with crossing:markings=zebra commented 2025-12-09 10:41:50 UTC by Fred_OSM ♦4 |
| 172785185 (Comments: 2) | Fred_OSM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Done with crossing:markings=zebra commented 2025-12-09 10:41:33 UTC by Fred_OSM ♦4 |
| 175705995 (Comments: 1) | pohang1233 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted unsubstantiated deletions. please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19136 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175706637 commented 2025-12-09 10:39:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175705967 (Comments: 1) | pohang1233 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted unsubstantiated deletions. please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19136 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175706637 commented 2025-12-09 10:39:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 170361604 (Comments: 2) | gosgtan (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wait, it is a deeper problem. This is way so ot simply should not have this tag. But it is also city-wide landuse=residential, while not area inside is residential (includes say cemetery) commented 2025-12-09 10:37:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175704554 (Comments: 1) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 105) | Reverted in changeset 175706429 as in error. commented 2025-12-09 10:35:47 UTC by nevw ♦2,089 |
| 167597718 (Comments: 1) | ptrider (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used type=boundary0 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125018234/history Have you maybe meant type=boundary ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2025-12-09 10:33:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175403657 (Comments: 1) | joshkeysgs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Rather accurately mapped. However, do not cluster multiple buildings and map them as 1 building. When an object shows no shadow, it is not above ground level, so don't map it as a building. Best regards and ke... commented 2025-12-09 10:31:12 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 170278479 (Comments: 1) | Franco Lilliu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used tracktype=grade 2 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70708306/history Have you maybe meant tracktype=grade2 ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2025-12-09 10:28:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 14307105 (Comments: 1) | KaterinaStruhova (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2071575161/history has shop = petrol that was added in this edit is it a fuel station? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel Or is it a shop selling botled petrol? Maybe as a fu... commented 2025-12-09 10:28:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175701390 (Comments: 2) | BBJIB (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, sehr gut bemerkt! Ich hab es gerade eben korrigiert. Danke. commented 2025-12-09 10:27:35 UTC by BBJIB ♦15 |
| 175696761 (Comments: 2) | da_real (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Limes, danke dir für diesen Hinweis! Als ich dort Wandern war, waren diese Wege sehr deutlich zu sehen. Daher hab ich mir beim mappen nichts dabei gedacht. Wenn nicht schon geschehen, werde ich die Info zu den Wegen hinzufügen.... commented 2025-12-09 10:12:28 UTC by da_real ♦1 |
| 175682649 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted because of node creation and used for splitting ways #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175705459 commented 2025-12-09 10:08:58 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 139114538 (Comments: 1) | denjixx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11072292818/history has shop = drinks that was added in this edit shop=drinks ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=beverages... commented 2025-12-09 10:08:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
 | 173296877 (Comments: 1) | Bossj23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13233757537/history has shop = drinks that was added in this edit shop=drinks ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=beverages... commented 2025-12-09 10:08:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 171411864 (Comments: 1) | Dulvoyinn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used tracktype=grade2c on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371586337/history Have you maybe meant tracktype=grade2 ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2025-12-09 10:08:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175683877 (Comments: 3) | Leszek Zych (Discussed changesets: 2) | Skoro nie ma tam żadnego biura przyjmującego klientów, a jedynie miejsce rejestracji firmy, to nie powinno być czegoś takiego na mapie. commented 2025-12-09 10:05:31 UTC by YomanNH ♦419 |
| 158995456 (Comments: 1) | Franco-PTY (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12330308511/history has shop = mini_super that was added in this edit Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=convenienc... commented 2025-12-09 09:58:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 168698681 (Comments: 2) | Portti (Discussed changesets: 3) | It was a type which I've now fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. commented 2025-12-09 09:58:07 UTC by Portti ♦3 |
| 126682220 (Comments: 1) | streetinformer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used mtb:scale:uphill=4;6 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640686207/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale:uphill=5 ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-09 09:55:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 22062904 (Comments: 1) | Vautour (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used mtb:scale:uphill=4;6 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141325669/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale:uphill=5 ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-09 09:55:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 32814080 (Comments: 1) | isvedic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used mtb:scale:uphill=2;4 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336546159/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale:uphill=3 ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-09 09:55:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 8901701 (Comments: 1) | petersfreeman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used mtb:scale:uphill=-2 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83144426/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale:uphill=2- ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited... commented 2025-12-09 09:55:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 28762248 (Comments: 1) | oesp_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used mtb:scale:uphill=-1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242584686/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale:uphill=1- ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-09 09:54:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 36304619 (Comments: 1) | Sonntagsradler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used mtb:scale:uphill=-3 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389082178/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale:uphill=3- ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-09 09:53:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 172657352 (Comments: 1) | Fredie (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used mtb:scale=1+- on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28782459/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale=1 ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2025-12-09 09:52:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 172351267 (Comments: 1) | Fredie (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used mtb:scale=1+- on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518886898/history Have you maybe meant mtb:scale=1 ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects... commented 2025-12-09 09:52:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175702177 (Comments: 2) | MHMart (Discussed changesets: 4) | Kijk even hier hoe evt de bakken te mappen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding commented 2025-12-09 09:48:41 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174933550 (Comments: 1) | RailandSea (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.os.org/way/884516982. What is the mean of the the key railway:otc ? Did you mean railway:ctc? commented 2025-12-09 09:47:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175647920 (Comments: 3) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | There's a second field you can use for the unit numbers, `addr:unit` to be used alongside `addr:housenumber` of 20 commented 2025-12-09 09:46:46 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦145 |
| 173215547 (Comments: 2) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hi burrscurr, I looked at it and I guess I didn't choose the right category. It really doesn't look like a community center. I removed the tag. I'll try to be more careful next time. Thanks Have a nice day Kookykooky commented 2025-12-09 09:46:42 UTC by Kookykooky ♦33 |
| 168882005 (Comments: 1) | Jojo4u (Discussed changesets: 65) | Hi, die Baustelle ist durch mitlerweile oder? :) VG David commented 2025-12-09 09:46:28 UTC by dadavid ♦516 |
 | 169893050 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 908) | Definitely a mistake - fixed. commented 2025-12-09 09:46:11 UTC by mueschel ♦6,754 |
| 175340195 (Comments: 1) | JJIglesias (Discussed changesets: 135) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/3044538941. Did you have any source for the value of the key population:212 ? commented 2025-12-09 09:42:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175690166 (Comments: 1) | Peter N Brooks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you again for mapping this path and the other you added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175690317. I don't know this part of Wirksworth well enough to have used these paths, but as mapped these paths are dead ends that do... commented 2025-12-09 09:38:25 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 175617730 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 123) | Zgodnie z komunikatem na stronie dworca peron 0 miał być wyłączony tylko w dniach 25.11.-09.12.: https://dawz.pl/ commented 2025-12-09 09:33:42 UTC by SzymonH ♦218 |
| 175689247 (Comments: 1) | COOL TNT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi COOL TNT , this changeset has creted several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and displaced ways: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=2.26266&lat=48.78053&zoom=15&baselayer=Ge... commented 2025-12-09 09:33:01 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 175631598 (Comments: 3) | Pfeiftafel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-09 09:27:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175701450 (Comments: 3) | Mybuqo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke... duidelijk. commented 2025-12-09 09:26:34 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 162630137 (Comments: 1) | DHRUV BHARADWAJ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12596379876/history has shop = automobile that was added in this edit Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=car ? If yes, what is the difference between this and ... commented 2025-12-09 09:25:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 171670414 (Comments: 2) | rkluvanec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dobrý deň, ďakujem za upozornenie, ide o chybu. Súhlasím s návrhom zmeny na highway=tertiary_link, upravím. commented 2025-12-09 09:24:51 UTC by rkluvanec ♦1 |
| 175692721 (Comments: 1) | Revigurize (Discussed changesets: 2) | Deze vermelding heb ik verwijderd. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-09 09:23:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 134300911 (Comments: 1) | Добринка (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158431648/history has surface = грунт that was added in this edit Which value from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface fits? Is it safe to assume and remotely retag with no verification th... commented 2025-12-09 09:23:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175701872 (Comments: 2) | MHMart (Discussed changesets: 4) | Het gebouw is dan weer een building=riding_hall https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Driding_hall De bak(ken) kun je taggen met leisure=pitch sport=equestrian. Alles bij elkaar heet dan manege (horse_riding) en dan is ee... commented 2025-12-09 09:21:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 153789691 (Comments: 1) | Maverick12 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hello! You used shop=vakant on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494681724/history Have you maybe meant shop=vacant ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2025-12-09 09:20:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 158162564 (Comments: 1) | CartoGlobe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used surface=asphaltep on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/736233655/history Have you maybe meant surface=asphalt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2025-12-09 09:20:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
 | 157988139 (Comments: 1) | SebasVasquezT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=unpaved| on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324527341/history Have you maybe meant surface=unpaved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2025-12-09 09:20:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 64797237 (Comments: 1) | Aiiluo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! What you wanted to express by produce=fish;鱼 ? Is "鱼" just repeating "fish" in local language? commented 2025-12-09 09:19:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175399794 (Comments: 1) | Cascafico (Discussed changesets: 81) | Hi Cascafico, thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways and overlapping wood and forest areas: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=12.45554&lat=45.98627&zoom=13&... commented 2025-12-09 09:18:18 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 175679821 (Comments: 2) | kotkirobiamrr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Klasy dróg w OSM nie są sztywno powiązane z urzędowymi klasami dróg oczywiście miało być :P commented 2025-12-09 09:10:45 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦827 |
| 175682693 (Comments: 1) | Misticenea (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao. Se questa strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140743327 e' interamente asfaltata, non può essere una tracktype=grade2 ma deve essere grade1. Se la superficie cambia, la strada deve essere spezzata e ad ogni tronco deve essere a... commented 2025-12-09 09:05:21 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 175695999 (Comments: 1) | Afribit Africa BCE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-12-09 08:59:06 UTC by Comino ♦270 |
| 175523813 (Comments: 1) | Daneel76 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo, Daneel76, für diesen Änderungssatz finden sich 6 Fehlermeldungen, siehe: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476&item=3032%2C3160%2C9001&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=14/50.57884/8.48... commented 2025-12-09 08:57:59 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦138 |
| 175682465 (Comments: 1) | Misticenea (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. In genere quando vedo un nome del genere, il numero si riferisce ad un numero civico presente in quel tratto di strada e non e' relativo al nome della stessa. Ciao, Andrea commented 2025-12-09 08:55:00 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 175628954 (Comments: 2) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 621) | To prawda. Ale to dlatego, że go nie ma w EGiB, a pozostałe dwa są, a ze zdjęcia nie korzystałem. Postaram się dzisiaj poprawić. commented 2025-12-09 08:54:13 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,333 |
| 114192915 (Comments: 1) | NoelB (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533250740/history has building = foundations that was added in this edit so well, it is not a building at all? Just foundations due to building being unfinished/destroyed? If it is being contructed then ... commented 2025-12-09 08:48:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 168662222 (Comments: 1) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 140) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312590018/history has building = foundations that was added in this edit so well, it is not a building at all? Just foundations due to building being unfinished/destroyed? If it is being contructed then... commented 2025-12-09 08:48:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 156215816 (Comments: 1) | dmat24 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12157163967/history has shop = thrift-shop that was added in this edit shop=thrift-shop ? Is it shop=variety_store ? If not, how it differs from shop=variety_store? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... commented 2025-12-09 08:40:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 132963172 (Comments: 3) | Voirie_3M (Discussed changesets: 13) | thanks! commented 2025-12-09 08:38:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 108840989 (Comments: 4) | boute002 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi boute002, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625292785 wordt aangegeven met layer=-1. Dat is vreemd, want op de luchtfoto's is te zien dat alles op hetzelfde niveau ligt als de omliggende straten . Het is dus layer=0 en hoeft niet te worde... commented 2025-12-09 08:36:17 UTC by lyctkel ♦350 |
| 175701250 (Comments: 1) | MHMart (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag MHMart, Formeel juist getagd, maar het zal (nog) niet renderen op de kaart. Meestal los ik het op door leisure=horse_riding op het vlak te taggen icm met landuse=farmyard Dan zal de naam wel renderen. Voorbeeld: https://ww... commented 2025-12-09 08:34:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175241916 (Comments: 2) | mlebourg_hlc (Discussed changesets: 2) | bonjour, parce qu'il s'agit d'un arrêt de la ligne 925, si l'intégration des réseaux départementaux n'est pas terminée en 29 elle est bien avancée. Je corrige. commented 2025-12-09 08:34:42 UTC by mlebourg_hlc ♦1 |
| 175681434 (Comments: 1) | jgaffphoto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19935053. You need two ways (role from, to) and one point (exists, but without the role via). The first realtion https://www.osm.org/relation/19935052 is correct. commented 2025-12-09 08:16:12 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175684575 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! commented 2025-12-09 08:09:12 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175684505 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. commented 2025-12-09 08:07:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 174453324 (Comments: 3) | Patchanka (Discussed changesets: 42) | ok cool, merci, bonne journée ! commented 2025-12-09 08:07:41 UTC by Donlooba411 ♦12 |
| 165395072 (Comments: 1) | user48576 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11173596969/history/2 Je suppose que c'est un amenity=device_charging_station Un point de recharge pour appareils mobiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR%3ATag%3Aamenity%3Ddevice... commented 2025-12-09 08:04:53 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 175684358 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. commented 2025-12-09 08:03:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175684328 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. commented 2025-12-09 08:03:47 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175684301 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. commented 2025-12-09 08:03:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175684271 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. commented 2025-12-09 08:03:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 140926980 (Comments: 1) | xrt (Discussed changesets: 56) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11173596969/history/1 est-ce que tu voulais dire amenity=device_charging_station Un point de recharge pour appareils mobiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR%3ATag%3Aamenity%3Ddevi... commented 2025-12-09 08:03:24 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 175684236 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. commented 2025-12-09 08:03:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175684208 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. commented 2025-12-09 08:03:12 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175684169 (Comments: 1) | Gregory215 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. commented 2025-12-09 08:02:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175665370 (Comments: 5) | Pistouf (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ok merci pour ces précisions, je laisse comme ça. commented 2025-12-09 08:01:41 UTC by Syl ♦1,012 |
| 90894370 (Comments: 1) | reswara (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/182036225 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-09 07:53:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175688026 (Comments: 1) | Disel303 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! Please do not use the map to store private purchase information. That is vandalism. I have therefore reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-09 07:47:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175687880 (Comments: 1) | Disel303 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! Please do not use the map to store private purchase information. That is vandalism. I have therefore reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-09 07:47:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175687820 (Comments: 1) | Disel303 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! Please do not use the map to store private purchase information. That is vandalism. I have therefore reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-09 07:47:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175699830 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 10) | This is the NZH Report noting the completion. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/companies/retail/countdown-botany-completes-woolworths-rebrand-as-chain-ends-14-year-era/KD47TSWSVREYPCI7Y2RGRACU3M/ commented 2025-12-09 07:44:25 UTC by EleGlobe ♦9 |
| 175667258 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM13 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Здравствуйте. Спасибо, исправил commented 2025-12-09 07:44:07 UTC by Ozon OSM13 ♦2 |
| 175689660 (Comments: 1) | bkleipool (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag bkleipool, Lijkt me oke zo. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-09 07:40:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175167294 (Comments: 3) | Ozon OSM12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте, ошибочно поставила. Уже удалила, спасибо commented 2025-12-09 07:37:20 UTC by Ozon OSM12 ♦2 |
| 175672536 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi again, what is your source for the stars= tag? It's usually only used for hotels and restaurants. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:stars commented 2025-12-09 07:32:30 UTC by rhhs ♦168 |
| 175335828 (Comments: 1) | Kerry Irons (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please read the wiki before changing route tagging. What is the mean of the tag source="network=nCN" or network:type\t= "network=ncn" ? commented 2025-12-09 07:31:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175692701 (Comments: 2) | Revigurize (Discussed changesets: 2) | Verplaatst naar Koepelplein. description verwijderd, naam aangepast Mvg eggie commented 2025-12-09 07:31:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175630518 (Comments: 1) | PouleNoire (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi PouleNoire, this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=0.61939&lat=45.15411&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&... commented 2025-12-09 07:30:31 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 175655508 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi again! I can recommend not to use the kerb=lowered_and_sloped value, because it's rarely used (only 0.04% of all kerb values, https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/kerb#values ) so there is a high risk that map data users will not recognise ... commented 2025-12-09 07:25:29 UTC by rhhs ♦168 |
| 175696618 (Comments: 1) | Kabab Spot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/2919975357 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-09 07:14:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175612406 (Comments: 2) | Michael_NZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok thanks for the heads up. Im new to this :) commented 2025-12-09 06:59:00 UTC by Michael_NZ ♦1 |
| 175691539 (Comments: 1) | Manuelaroca (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the quick fix! commented 2025-12-09 06:56:36 UTC by jandar22 ♦34 |
| 175060805 (Comments: 4) | pesec (Discussed changesets: 88) | Здравствуйте, mavl. Яндекс-зеркала как конкретный источник данных не указывается. А использую я их для сверки в своём городе того, что м... commented 2025-12-09 06:15:45 UTC by pesec ♦303 |
| 175697048 (Comments: 2) | KennyDap (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your work too :) I'm making changes one at a time to make sure I don't miss anything and to be able to make changes in reverse order. There have been a lot of vandals lately, so there's always a risk of missing somethi... commented 2025-12-09 06:15:11 UTC by KennyDap ♦52 |
| 175697287 (Comments: 1) | thautal (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted changeset 175685047 commented 2025-12-09 06:13:05 UTC by thautal ♦48 |
| 175685047 (Comments: 1) | Marijella (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei ja tervetuloa muokkaamaan OpenStreetMappia! Haluat selvästi muokata yhtä liikettä, mutta samalla tulet muokanneeksi rakennuksia ja teitä vääriin muotoihin. Olen nyt korjannut ne, mutta koita olla liikuttamatta turhaa... commented 2025-12-09 06:12:06 UTC by thautal ♦48 |
| 175695490 (Comments: 4) | 마동석 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175697155 commented 2025-12-09 06:04:19 UTC by KennyDap ♦52 |
| 175572371 (Comments: 3) | Fedde89 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo Tjuro, Dit is een goudsmid atelier waar je alleen op afspraak naar binnen kunt. In dit atelier werken twee goudsmeden (Lonneke Keuten en Jacqueline Vugs), beiden met hun eigen website, email en telefoonnummer, maar op hun contact pagina... commented 2025-12-09 06:03:54 UTC by Fedde89 ♦4 |
| 175695523 (Comments: 1) | 마동석 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175697150 commented 2025-12-09 06:03:48 UTC by KennyDap ♦52 |
| 175503848 (Comments: 1) | AliKarabulut1956 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merhaba. Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınızda neleri neden değiştirdiğinizi kısaca açıklayınız: Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments? Yol sın... commented 2025-12-09 05:54:28 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦180 |
| 175690127 (Comments: 1) | <img src=x onerror=alert(55)> (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175696228 where the comment is: "Remove test edits" commented 2025-12-09 05:17:03 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 175689983 (Comments: 4) | <img src=x onerror=alert(55)> (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175696225 where the comment is: "Remove test edits" commented 2025-12-09 05:16:49 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 174905996 (Comments: 1) | Byte Bumble (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, ist im Kapellenweg jetzt Tempo 50 oder 30? commented 2025-12-09 05:13:08 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦156 |
| 175690716 (Comments: 2) | Wullen (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset reverts the mappers own previous edits. commented 2025-12-09 05:06:48 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175695859 (Comments: 1) | kss45 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175695947 commented 2025-12-09 05:02:34 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175692215 (Comments: 1) | 길표시 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted deletions. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19133 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175695938 commented 2025-12-09 05:02:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175692306 (Comments: 1) | 길표시 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted deletions. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19133 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175695938 commented 2025-12-09 05:02:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175692164 (Comments: 1) | 길표시 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted deletions. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19133 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175695938 commented 2025-12-09 05:02:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175644338 (Comments: 2) | uranium2662 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me. I've read up on the linked material, and I understand where I went wrong. commented 2025-12-09 04:46:11 UTC by uranium2662 ♦1 |
| 175695507 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 17) | early 2000's this area had a push to incorporate as french valley commented 2025-12-09 04:39:44 UTC by ieguy3 ♦17 |
| 175686881 (Comments: 2) | Koki sir (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19132 commented 2025-12-09 03:58:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175465239 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - invalid name changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175694677 commented 2025-12-09 03:52:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175468928 (Comments: 2) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - invalid name changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175694677 commented 2025-12-09 03:52:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175465261 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - invalid name changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175694677 commented 2025-12-09 03:52:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175468876 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - invalid name changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175694677 commented 2025-12-09 03:52:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175468860 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - invalid name changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175694677 commented 2025-12-09 03:52:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175468829 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - invalid name changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175694677 commented 2025-12-09 03:52:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175465226 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - invalid name changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175694677 commented 2025-12-09 03:52:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175685455 (Comments: 1) | Wullen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Wullen. A lot of these small patches of woodland that you've added, should be better tagged as individual trees. Thanks commented 2025-12-09 03:41:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 151200835 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Hi, In this changeset, you removed junction=roundabout near https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083906#map=19/45.913264/6.143085&layers=N, can you please add it back cause routing is incorrect ? commented 2025-12-09 03:38:42 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦223 |
| 168700000 (Comments: 2) | GenericUsername4 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hey, thanks for reaching out! I saw it while driving. Sorry, I meant to put down survey. commented 2025-12-09 03:14:45 UTC by GenericUsername4 ♦13 |
| 175423928 (Comments: 3) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 12) | Yes, but none of those seem to me to be population centers of regional importance, nor are these roads part of a network of expressways, so I don't really think they meet the criteria of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Hig... commented 2025-12-09 02:57:09 UTC by willkmis ♦188 |
| 175677109 (Comments: 2) | willkmis (Discussed changesets: 17) | I wasn't sure if it was meant to be this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8254222443, which is a lot closer, but also in a location that might be hard to survey... commented 2025-12-09 02:46:57 UTC by willkmis ♦188 |
| 175678069 (Comments: 3) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 31) | who is we? osm is a global project and sure there are local specialities but where is this come from? ATM or defibrillator were mapped in Spain, so whats the difference? There are 3 Megabyte of OSM data having an indoor=yes in Spain. Will you dele... commented 2025-12-09 02:41:34 UTC by Seandebasti ♦128 |
| 175573902 (Comments: 1) | Horible_4 (Discussed changesets: 109) | Tolong gunakan sumber dengan tag source=* yang benar. Sumber data dapat berupa link sebagai data sekunder. commented 2025-12-09 02:34:16 UTC by FajrAl ♦125 |
| 175663668 (Comments: 3) | priege_8315 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19129 commented 2025-12-09 02:29:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175649369 (Comments: 2) | 미대아빠 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19128 commented 2025-12-09 02:25:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| X | 173791201 (Comments: 2) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 能否解释删除中越北部湾分界线第18、19界点的原因？ 若非我正巧在此变更集发布的第20日整合北部湾分界线，这类破坏性编辑的数据大概率将会残留数年。 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2025-12-09 02:09:59 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦21 |
| 175692531 (Comments: 1) | jigyasa_gautam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tidak ada bangunan di sini, seharusnya bisa di-skip. Jangan membuat objek yang tidak ada. There is no building here, it should be skippable. Don't create objects that don't exist. commented 2025-12-09 01:52:26 UTC by FajrAl ♦125 |
| 175676080 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Silakan cermati komentar di changeset berikut: changeset/175677139#c1522966 commented 2025-12-09 01:44:49 UTC by FajrAl ♦125 |
| 175662999 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Silakan cermati komentar di changeset berikut: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677139#c1522966 commented 2025-12-09 01:44:11 UTC by FajrAl ♦125 |
| 175608243 (Comments: 4) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 204) | el 29 paseo colon parque sarmiento sentido a la boca sigue andando creo? commented 2025-12-09 01:44:05 UTC by i2004 ♦173 |
| 175677139 (Comments: 1) | Fendy Wijaya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cara membuat batas di OpenStreetMap bukan begitu. Caranya: 1. Gunakan tombol U untuk menyembunyikan layer yang lain. 2. Polygon yang dibuat tidak boleh tersambung dengan apa pun selain batas lainnya. Contoh: sungai, jalan, penggunaan lahan. Har... commented 2025-12-09 01:41:12 UTC by FajrAl ♦125 |
| 175680018 (Comments: 2) | pablorez (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://geoprocessamento.contagem.mg.gov.br/portal/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?data_id=dataSource_3-193798ed8da-layer-5%3A69%2CdataSource_3-193798ed8db-layer-6%3A203%2B204%2B205&id=c7b7a53e23d74741b9bd84c4d7d51ada&page=P%C3%A1gina commented 2025-12-09 01:29:10 UTC by Lucas Santana ♦8 |
| 175692063 (Comments: 2) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 7) | This changeset is about the TTC 8 Broadview east part. I added some bus stops to the relation. commented 2025-12-09 01:05:01 UTC by hahae ♦15 |
| 175661519 (Comments: 1) | Anon1966 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Please do not delete existing streets. Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175692097 commented 2025-12-09 01:02:15 UTC by infeeeee ♦619 |
| 175691829 (Comments: 1) | unyny (Discussed changesets: 522) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457039995<... commented 2025-12-09 00:50:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175661659 (Comments: 1) | Anon1966 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello! Please stop deleting this road, it's there. What do you want to map this with this change? There are some access restrictions on the street, but they are mapped correctly according to Hungarian traffic laws. Here is a mapill... commented 2025-12-09 00:50:29 UTC by infeeeee ♦619 |
| 173988622 (Comments: 2) | Kayla Hegarty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175691711 commented 2025-12-09 00:39:57 UTC by Mxdanger ♦85 |
 | 175600299 (Comments: 6) | Sara1000 (Discussed changesets: 11) | In beiden Fällen existiert dieser Standort nicht mehr. Er wurde an einen anderen Standort verschoben. Es gibt keine weitere Erklärung zu den Beiträgen, die in den beiden Knotenpunkten vorhanden waren. Sie bitten um... commented 2025-12-09 00:38:22 UTC by Sara1000 ♦6 |
| 169416131 (Comments: 3) | PanRojko (Discussed changesets: 6) | Cyklotrasa popri VUB nie je fyzicky oddelena od chodnika, je to podla dopravnej znacky chodnik pre pesich aj cyklistov len je segregovany (ciarou na ceste). takze staci znacka segregegated=yes a bicycle=designated a foot=designated na jednej OSM cest... commented 2025-12-09 00:24:51 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,750 |
| 175262952 (Comments: 2) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 460) | Wycofane commented 2025-12-09 00:24:02 UTC by olo81 ♦694 |
| 159252960 (Comments: 1) | Kamil Adam (Discussed changesets: 57) | Jeśli jest przepust, to nie ma mostu. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334835824 commented 2025-12-09 00:15:58 UTC by olo81 ♦694 |
| 175101575 (Comments: 3) | vrg (Discussed changesets: 20) | Usunąłem też dziwne tagi przypisane do ciągu pieszego. Jeżeli są na nim w jakiś sposób dopuszczone rowery, trzeba ją otagować według tego schematu. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery commented 2025-12-09 00:08:55 UTC by olo81 ♦694 |
| 175601605 (Comments: 1) | green_leek (Discussed changesets: 41) | grumble grumble... in my view this is excessive to split such small sections due to a small barrier in the middle and how they were mapped before was much simpler. commented 2025-12-09 00:01:08 UTC by aharvey ♦1,900 |
| 174930469 (Comments: 1) | Manuelaroca (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, it looks like as part of your changeset you moved this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1649972474) ~1500ft from its correct location, distorting the pedestrian path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775141614) and area attached to it. I... commented 2025-12-08 23:45:02 UTC by jandar22 ♦34 |
| 162819612 (Comments: 2) | lakedistrict (Discussed changesets: 56) | I probably intended to select mobile_phone, but mobile_phone_accessories is an even better fit. Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175690916 commented 2025-12-08 23:45:00 UTC by lakedistrict ♦313 |
| 175648726 (Comments: 2) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 204) | Información redundante en name commented 2025-12-08 23:42:13 UTC by AgusQui ♦618 |
| 135841656 (Comments: 1) | Atom52 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The Hungarian name of maly Dunaj is already tagged on the whole river relation at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5535899 . No need to add it to parts of the river. commented 2025-12-08 23:36:41 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,750 |
| 175614191 (Comments: 2) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Fen<3 I've driven nearby here also. Just letting you know that's a source. commented 2025-12-08 23:35:59 UTC by JasiahMaps1010 ♦4 |
| 162075824 (Comments: 16) | LightWater7882 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The funny thing is that the original contributor had chosen a tag documented on objects other than those in this changeset before a participant in this thread made a mass edit to add a documented tag and then reverted it to say that remote editing sh... commented 2025-12-08 23:29:09 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 168467799 (Comments: 1) | Atom52 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, how did youi find out the number of road 130? There is no Mapillary street level imagery along this road. So what imagery did you use? Also, the Slovak road database does not have a road 130, it is still marked as 1049. Also road 130 would be sen... commented 2025-12-08 23:25:59 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,750 |
| 147568699 (Comments: 1) | gileri (Discussed changesets: 102) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3476331833/history/7 si tu en as l'occasion, pourrais-tu vérifier : si le réseau est toujours Izivia ? l'opendata a l'air de dire que Izivia est opérateur et q... commented 2025-12-08 23:20:51 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 167960404 (Comments: 2) | Atom52 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51874700 adding building=hotel only specifies how the building looks like, or how it is constructed. It does not say it is used as a hotel. For that you need tourism=hotel. You have totally destroyed the build... commented 2025-12-08 23:17:55 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,750 |
| 174483912 (Comments: 1) | Dee Kaart (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, Merci pour ces améliorations https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449487968 socket EF -> socket:typee :) Cordialement, Marc commented 2025-12-08 23:09:08 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 173027505 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I apologize for the inconvenience; I haven't been checking the comments for a few weeks. Thank you for keeping an eye on the map we all use. commented 2025-12-08 23:08:52 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 173064341 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I apologize for the inconvenience; I haven't been checking the comments for a few weeks. Thank you for keeping an eye on the map we all use. commented 2025-12-08 23:08:36 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 172929358 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I have already removed the problematic tags. I was conducting an initial test of the national highway organization, but this will be on hold for now while we resolve the related issues. Thank you for your comment and sorry for the delay in respond... commented 2025-12-08 23:07:24 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 156919613 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I'm sorry you had to make changes. We were in class at the time, and many students were asking for revisions, so I did it without being fully aware of it. I apologize. I didn't see it in detail; I only just now have the opportunity to revie... commented 2025-12-08 23:04:38 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 175651715 (Comments: 1) | Vigilence (Discussed changesets: 2) | Would've been nice to leave it as "demolished" Regards, T. commented 2025-12-08 22:52:57 UTC by tanonin ♦64 |
| 147548696 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | Gracias por el dato, lo tendre en cuenta para futuras ediciones. commented 2025-12-08 22:50:01 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 174355345 (Comments: 5) | Peter N Brooks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks Tom. That’s great. I’ve added a note where the railway is incorrect. Also there is a path that links Fanny Shaws Park to the Cemetery and to Spring close. I’ll have a go at adding it but would be grateful if you check my amen... commented 2025-12-08 22:43:17 UTC by Peter N Brooks ♦1 |
| 175659162 (Comments: 1) | Daniel---- (Discussed changesets: 87) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-08 22:25:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175671996 (Comments: 2) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-12-08 22:25:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175663940 (Comments: 32) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Wartość addr:place zawiera błąd w pisowni. Upewnij się, czy wielkość liter jest poprawna, oraz czy ni... commented 2025-12-08 22:24:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175679972 (Comments: 1) | magdalena8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie trzeba w opisie każdego zestawu zmian pisać "jestem mieszkanką": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-08 22:18:27 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175688669 (Comments: 1) | yughamon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Please use the appropriate text box to provide more details about *what* you are doing. Do not keep the "Fixed with Osmose" default message for all your changesets, that makes no sense. Edit it when you start mapping, ... commented 2025-12-08 22:18:17 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 175589576 (Comments: 4) | NeisReview (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ich habe das bereits gesehen und versucht, alle Beiträge von der Karte zu löschen, da sie bereits verschoben wurden. Jedes Mal, wenn ich einen Beitrag ändern oder löschen möchte, funktioniert es nicht. Ich war vorher neu in d... commented 2025-12-08 22:16:23 UTC by Sara1000 ♦6 |
| 175676129 (Comments: 1) | oglord (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello oglord, thank you for contributing to Open Street Map. Unfortunately License of Royal Mail's postcode finder tool is incompatible with Open Street Map and as such cannot be used as a source. As such i'm reverting this change. h... commented 2025-12-08 22:10:35 UTC by kitsee ♦118 |
| 175242387 (Comments: 3) | Mapping Dutchman (Discussed changesets: 5) | My main motivation here is to encourage replacing roof:shape=pitched by something more specific, and to investigate whether it uniformly used in the same meaning as roof:shape=skillion well, this proves that not all if them are roof:shape=ski... commented 2025-12-08 22:09:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175686817 (Comments: 1) | Jazz37 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi Jazz, The cycle lane on Van Road is not mapped correctly. cycle lanes should be mapped with a `cycleway:left=lane` tag on the road way and should not be mapped as a separate way just as separate car lanes are not mapped with separate ways. "l... commented 2025-12-08 22:04:46 UTC by kitsee ♦118 |
| 160487358 (Comments: 1) | josmougn (Discussed changesets: 76) | Ce "neighbourhood" inclut des rues de l'autre côté de la N20 dans les résultats de recherche (ex: rue Mozart) et ce n'est pas bon. Ca me rappelle la discussion au sujet de "l'Epine Montain" &a... commented 2025-12-08 22:03:04 UTC by osmann ♦4 |
| 175679358 (Comments: 1) | LinoHammer (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo LinoHammer, wieso änderst Du hier bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4146205 "sidewalk:left=separate" in "sidewalk=no" ? Hier ist eindeutig ein separater Weg links. Gruß Zrop commented 2025-12-08 21:56:25 UTC by Zrop ♦118 |
| 172799257 (Comments: 1) | Thrimbor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Kollege, bitte sei so lieb und prüfe mal, ob in Weschnitz an den von dirn bearbeiteten Stellen wirklich Fusswege sind. Ich kann keine(n) erkennen. Danke und Gruß commented 2025-12-08 21:50:06 UTC by Interteutones ♦48 |
| 175685981 (Comments: 1) | Cybermanx (Discussed changesets: 5) | also updated wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dlimited_traffic_zone https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:boundary%3Dlimited_traffic_zone commented 2025-12-08 21:48:01 UTC by Cybermanx ♦8 |
| 175641823 (Comments: 2) | kapazao (Discussed changesets: 74) | Sí, ya me di cuenta, gracias :) commented 2025-12-08 21:44:13 UTC by kapazao ♦954 |
| 175687871 (Comments: 1) | jhrnandez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Muy bien Juan!! sigue asi commented 2025-12-08 21:42:23 UTC by AlexFloresO ♦1 |
| 175685856 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo, emergency=water_tank ist hier falsch. Auch water=reservoir ist suspekt. Das vorherige Tagging war okay. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-08 21:38:13 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175687860 (Comments: 1) | شنوایی و سمعک مهرگان کرج (Discussed changesets: 1) | مرکز شنوایی سنجی و سمعک مهرگان نمایندگی فروش سمعک در کرج ارزیابی سرگیجه و وزوز گوش و درمان commented 2025-12-08 21:36:49 UTC by شنوایی و سمعک مهرگان کرج ♦1 |
| 165554045 (Comments: 5) | Ich124 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Perfekt, sieht jetzt gut aus :-) commented 2025-12-08 21:36:16 UTC by klnkengi ♦58 |
| 175687879 (Comments: 1) | JPJ&C (Discussed changesets: 6) | Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Svp niet zelf adressen toevoegen. Die zijn er al. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-08 21:36:04 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175687739 (Comments: 1) | JPJ&C (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi JPJ Je hoeft geen adresgegevens aan gebouwomtrekken toe te voegen. Er zijn al adresnodes. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-08 21:33:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175668232 (Comments: 2) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 9) | sorry for the second comment: the metadata of the changeset states "StreetView (April 2016)" as imagery_used Could you please elaborate on that commented 2025-12-08 21:20:45 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,727 |
| 175655895 (Comments: 4) | Michał Górny (Discussed changesets: 3) | Staram się dawać, acz zapominam. Były ze trzy kłody, z czego jedna złamana w pół — nie wyglądało to na coś, co nie osunie się pod stopami, a rzeczka pięknie zakwitła. commented 2025-12-08 21:10:46 UTC by Michał Górny ♦3 |
 | 175324411 (Comments: 4) | joserrg12 (Discussed changesets: 2478) | Thank you for the information you provided. I will defer to your knowledge on this. Gracias por la información que me proporcionaste. Confío en tus conocimientos sobre este tema. commented 2025-12-08 21:08:17 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦74 |
| 175686991 (Comments: 1) | braam7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My first edit, please correct something if something is wrong commented 2025-12-08 21:07:13 UTC by braam7 ♦1 |
| 175335851 (Comments: 9) | NoneyaBidness (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again! OSM is all volunteer, if you know its incorrect, you can choose to volunteer your time to fix it. Or you can choose to leave it alone, but again you cannot remove it without replacing it. I've taken a look and compared the tr... commented 2025-12-08 20:58:38 UTC by MassCartog ♦257 |
| 168895562 (Comments: 3) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 260) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-08 20:57:11 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,570 |
| 175686136 (Comments: 1) | Zedmoi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Seattle classical Christian School is not at this location. commented 2025-12-08 20:42:25 UTC by Zedmoi ♦3 |
| 175686191 (Comments: 1) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 12) | Corridor is trunk road on Google and Bing maps as well. commented 2025-12-08 20:41:44 UTC by Yushclay ♦14 |
| 175682549 (Comments: 2) | Hendrik Groen (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #175685999 Wat is je bedoeling? Die huisnummers klopten precies. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-08 20:36:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 157396805 (Comments: 3) | wvdp (Discussed changesets: 153) | It would seem so. ive added it back commented 2025-12-08 20:34:33 UTC by wvdp ♦65 |
| 174779614 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 185) | все эти правки по внесению названия маршрута в name дорожек и автодорог будут откачены. Маршруты создаются как отношения https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2025-12-08 20:31:40 UTC by literan ♦6,902 |
| 175684543 (Comments: 1) | Aleksandar Lukač (Discussed changesets: 10) | Yep .. dat is 'm :) commented 2025-12-08 20:29:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175677595 (Comments: 6) | Aleksandar Lukač (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dturnstile commented 2025-12-08 20:27:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175670695 (Comments: 1) | JanitorOfHannover (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo JanitorOfHannover, die Angabe der Öffnungszeiten vom Schreibwarenhandel wiesen mehrere syntaktische Fehler auf, die ich schon verbessert habe (andernfalls können Programme diese nicht verarbeiten). Mehere Tage werden dur... commented 2025-12-08 20:19:12 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦46 |
| 170465349 (Comments: 6) | Zedmoi (Discussed changesets: 3) | This lot and the road marked is completely gone now. It has been demolished. Previously when I noted it it was only closed. commented 2025-12-08 20:18:27 UTC by Zedmoi ♦3 |
| 175595056 (Comments: 5) | 市川ゆり子 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I don't mind changing an *obvious* typo to the correct form. In this case manmade to man_made. commented 2025-12-08 20:13:40 UTC by ilias_ ♦385 |
| 175677641 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 445) | Hello, opening_hours=24/7 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:opening%20hours=24/7?) is a legitimate tag, and most apps can successfully parse it. uselang=en If you mechanically change all those values into "Mo-Su 00:00... commented 2025-12-08 20:08:58 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 175676926 (Comments: 1) | Z1ZOU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Carrefour Market opens at 8:30, not 8:29. La Cité already existes on the map, so you created a duplicate. I fixed both points. Thank you and welcome to OSM. commented 2025-12-08 20:06:59 UTC by ilias_ ♦385 |
| 175683084 (Comments: 1) | Aleksandar Lukač (Discussed changesets: 10) | Wellicht dacht je dat het niet gelukt was, maar er lagen twee bruggen op elkaar. Ik heb er één verwijderd. Let op... Er lopen hiet wandelroutes. Die kun je niet onderbreken. Dan werkt het niet meer. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/... commented 2025-12-08 20:06:25 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175682992 (Comments: 1) | Aleksandar Lukač (Discussed changesets: 10) | warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway \t1 Opgelost Water door duiker Turkaaweg commented 2025-12-08 20:03:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175682911 (Comments: 2) | Aleksandar Lukač (Discussed changesets: 10) | De opliggende brug heb ik verwijderd. Wandelroute hersteld. gr eggie commented 2025-12-08 19:57:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175677804 (Comments: 4) | bkleipool (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je zou evt heel voorzichtig die adresnodes kunnen verplaatsen naar de plek waar ze werkelijk horen. De adressen zijn import vanuit het Kadaster en die plaatsen die adresnodes vaak willekeurig. Mapse commented 2025-12-08 19:48:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175634180 (Comments: 3) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Danke für die Korrektur. commented 2025-12-08 19:45:38 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦46 |
| 175677910 (Comments: 2) | Aleksandar Lukač (Discussed changesets: 10) | Als bovenstaand aangepast op een node. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-08 19:36:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175597888 (Comments: 3) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 31) | ну по идее да, я ставлю... в EveryDoor это поле заполняемо для любых магазинов). Лишним не будет например, кто-то захочет выгрузить все кафе, ... commented 2025-12-08 19:34:42 UTC by literan ♦6,902 |
| 175677285 (Comments: 1) | VinceHuls (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke, maar dit pand heeft wel een adres. Ik zal het herstellen. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-08 19:33:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175683052 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo, hier bitte wieder couplings, note und Geometrie überarbeiten. VG commented 2025-12-08 19:33:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175328846 (Comments: 1) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 182) | Is there a particular reason why you readded subareas to county relation? As per relation type documentation[1] these are not really needed, and also, if subcategories are collected then it seems to be forgotten that relations are not categor... commented 2025-12-08 19:32:44 UTC by Pikse ♦220 |
| 175683159 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo, bevor du weitermachst: Bitte korrigiere erst die bisherigen Eintragungen und nutze die Erkenntnisse daraus für die nächsten Schritte. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-08 19:32:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175682211 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo, hier relevant: - couplings - note - Geometrie (Hydrant mit Straße verbunden) Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-08 19:30:21 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175681577 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo, Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. Viele Gr&uu... commented 2025-12-08 19:27:33 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175596239 (Comments: 4) | AlexTopoRO (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks, it looks good, you can keep one way or do another separation at the entrance, however you like. Keep up the good work! commented 2025-12-08 19:26:24 UTC by Buraddo ♦157 |
| 175667147 (Comments: 1) | KDA3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, changed these to demolished:building=yes so they don't render on the map commented 2025-12-08 19:25:21 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,287 |
| 175681488 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo, noch ein zusätzlicher Hinweis zu „couplings“: Wenn diese tatsächlich erfasst werden – z. B. bei Überflurhydranten – dann mit Anzahl und Größe. D. h. beispielsweise couplings=2 |
| 175681265 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681488 commented 2025-12-08 19:23:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175681128 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681488 commented 2025-12-08 19:23:10 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175682114 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo, auch hier gilt die Anmerkung zu „couplings“. Wenn der Hydrant nicht nutzbar ist, sollte er mit disused:emergency=fire_hydrant statt emergency=fire_hydrant eingetragen werden. In „note“ ist dann der Hinweis sinnvol... commented 2025-12-08 19:22:15 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175335797 (Comments: 3) | NoneyaBidness (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can someone help? I am still seeing these old/destroyed trails on Trailforks Topo map. These trails no longer exist and are presenting an overlay obstruction to mark the new trails. How can this information be deleted permanently? commented 2025-12-08 19:21:12 UTC by NoneyaBidness ♦2 |
| 175681041 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175682114 commented 2025-12-08 19:19:05 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175681764 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen: - couplings=B Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die ... commented 2025-12-08 19:17:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175681918 (Comments: 1) | Jaap_van_der_Veen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Format phone aangepast met +31.. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-08 19:17:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175681207 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681764 commented 2025-12-08 19:12:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175680944 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681764 commented 2025-12-08 19:12:12 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175669438 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Ochtmersleben (Discussed changesets: 14) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681764 commented 2025-12-08 19:11:48 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 171103005 (Comments: 4) | Map-Peter (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hallo Christian, du schreibst ich habe "einige Fehler" im Bereich der "Halbinsel" in diesem CS gemacht. Eine Halbinsel gibt es in dem ganzen Gebiet nur westlich der westlichsten Badestelle: https://www.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-12-08 19:11:13 UTC by Map-Peter ♦340 |
| 175681606 (Comments: 2) | Wullen (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset reverts the creator’s own previous edits. commented 2025-12-08 19:03:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175638863 (Comments: 1) | Tonyfarms (Discussed changesets: 14) | welcome back :) this looks like a good addition to the database. Thank you. One thing I'd like you to consider going forward: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments happy mapping --- |
| 175667275 (Comments: 1) | romik80 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi there :) I don't really know how you got to Canada to delete that brigde but I'm here to let you know that I undeleted it. happy mapping --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using... commented 2025-12-08 18:56:37 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,727 |
| 163074402 (Comments: 3) | jtracey (Discussed changesets: 58) | That makes sense, I agree that the unique curbs/tactile paving justify separate ways here. Thanks! commented 2025-12-08 18:39:53 UTC by galen8183 ♦37 |
| 112748573 (Comments: 1) | PacerCZ (Discussed changesets: 25) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083762 commented 2025-12-08 18:36:34 UTC by Luzandro ♦958 |
| 175680723 (Comments: 1) | Broafnod (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM! Please don't use the name tag to describe the feature. If it has no name just leave it blank, thanks https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions commented 2025-12-08 18:29:31 UTC by MassCartog ♦257 |
| 126798425 (Comments: 2) | PCarew_EG (Discussed changesets: 8) | As indicated on the business website there is an abundant retail area where precious rocks and crystals are sold. A new value is likely needed. It is a shop, has multiple activities and an overall tourist attraction. If you feel the tagging shoul... commented 2025-12-08 18:23:13 UTC by PCarew_EG ♦10 |
| 175663590 (Comments: 1) | priege_8315 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175680417 commented 2025-12-08 18:12:39 UTC by KennyDap ♦52 |
| 173418175 (Comments: 1) | Einer12 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Deine Änderung des Gebäude-Grundrisses Frankfurter Straße 112 ist fehlerhaft. Auf dem Luftbild sind noch Baugerüste zu sehen, die nicht Teil des Gebäudes sind. Der präzise Grundriss ist im Liegenschaftskataster (Layer &... commented 2025-12-08 18:12:02 UTC by mmis-isra ♦2 |
| 175656559 (Comments: 2) | JacekBura (Discussed changesets: 8) | jak byk widac, że ludzie tam chodzą i to często ;D commented 2025-12-08 17:51:58 UTC by Yog Sot ♦373 |
| 175652312 (Comments: 3) | Lucas_OL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jeg tror du har fanget det. Retningen, som hovedvejen er tegnet i, er selvfølgelig vigtig, de små retningpile. 'cycleway=track' - der er en separat sti på begge sider. 'cycleway:left=track' - der er en... commented 2025-12-08 17:43:27 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,735 |
| 175675063 (Comments: 1) | Brogden (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera appears to have been placed on the map in the middle of a driveway. What's this camera mounted on? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175675063 commented 2025-12-08 17:31:39 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175632371 (Comments: 1) | Carvinus (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-12-08 17:30:45 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175674593 (Comments: 1) | felixthefreak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I even verified street names with the counties records at https://kitsap-od-kitcowa.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/d11d0b008a544c7f8c6e9b35b6b41b22_0/explore?location=47.800706%2C-122.654862%2... commented 2025-12-08 17:29:06 UTC by Glassman ♦5,651 |
| 175522880 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 121) | Okay. Well, isn't one of the rules for Interstates be that they don't have at-grade intersections? (I know this isn't an Interstate [yet], but still...) commented 2025-12-08 17:27:35 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦144 |
| 173065347 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I apologize for not responding to this comment earlier. I'm now replying to previous comments that were left unattended. Thank you for resolving this. commented 2025-12-08 17:27:33 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 173027456 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I apologize for not responding to this comment earlier. I'm now replying to previous comments that were left unattended. Thank you for resolving this. commented 2025-12-08 17:27:24 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 135615602 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I apologize for not responding to this comment earlier. I'm now replying to previous comments that were left unattended. commented 2025-12-08 17:26:59 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 107594425 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I apologize for not responding to this comment earlier. I'm now replying to previous comments that were left unattended. Thank you for resolving this. commented 2025-12-08 17:26:23 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 175650923 (Comments: 3) | MagicPocketbook462 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, adding a note or a fixme would also work. :) commented 2025-12-08 17:26:05 UTC by gurglypipe ♦958 |
| 175677295 (Comments: 1) | JustEpic38 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ostéopathe médicentre 2 commented 2025-12-08 17:24:12 UTC by JustEpic38 ♦1 |
| 122045289 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I apologize for not responding to this comment in the past; the tag has since been removed. commented 2025-12-08 17:23:11 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 175525286 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175678249 commented 2025-12-08 17:22:58 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175525389 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175678232 commented 2025-12-08 17:22:36 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175525516 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175678221 commented 2025-12-08 17:22:23 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175675881 (Comments: 4) | JuanitoPapito (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mooi! Ik heb je welkomstbericht ontvangen. Dus die ga ik even rustig doornemen :) En zal even kijken of ik de bestaande node kan aanpassen in Organic Maps ipv een nieuwe aan te maken. commented 2025-12-08 17:21:23 UTC by JuanitoPapito ♦2 |
| 175525883 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175678090 commented 2025-12-08 17:20:20 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175531609 (Comments: 2) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175678006 commented 2025-12-08 17:18:29 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175531705 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677976 commented 2025-12-08 17:17:47 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 167702796 (Comments: 3) | kabelhaai (Discussed changesets: 28) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4760725 commented 2025-12-08 17:17:30 UTC by kabelhaai ♦73 |
| 175532091 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677926 commented 2025-12-08 17:16:37 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175532344 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677867 commented 2025-12-08 17:15:24 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175572835 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677832 commented 2025-12-08 17:14:33 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175583435 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | building duplicates reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677686 commented 2025-12-08 17:10:58 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175583410 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | building duplicates reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677686 commented 2025-12-08 17:10:58 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175585186 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | building duplicates reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677686 commented 2025-12-08 17:10:58 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175582862 (Comments: 1) | AidaSlipko (Discussed changesets: 13) | building duplicates reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677686 commented 2025-12-08 17:10:57 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 173880129 (Comments: 6) | elmira_lyft (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, kitto33! Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding. Thank you for pointing out that error. We agree with your finding and will be correcting this on all relevant Express Lanes as soon as possible! We appreciate your cont... commented 2025-12-08 17:06:43 UTC by elmira_lyft ♦2 |
| 175470971 (Comments: 2) | PedestrianMapping_MapObscura (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks CRCulver for the feedback,I have corrected it, Going forward we will not add highway=crossing nodes at intersections of sidewalks and driveways. We appreciate the feedback. Thank you! commented 2025-12-08 16:58:07 UTC by PedestrianMapping_MapObscura ♦2 |
| 140033530 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | Yes this is a ref number from Colombian number commented 2025-12-08 16:57:22 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 175676168 (Comments: 2) | benguuuuu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you these were intentional I was removing the old golf course relations and creating one large boundary for the entire course. commented 2025-12-08 16:55:54 UTC by benguuuuu ♦3 |
| 134143659 (Comments: 1) | JuanitoPapito (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-08 16:54:59 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 173026260 (Comments: 4) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | I’m sorry for the inconvenience caused and for the fact that the revert had to be done by you. Best regards. commented 2025-12-08 16:54:35 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 36701868 (Comments: 7) | richlv (Discussed changesets: 40) | Sure, was not aware of loc_name but that definitely seems more fitting. commented 2025-12-08 16:53:24 UTC by rossbates ♦1 |
| 175676246 (Comments: 2) | LateNightTone (Discussed changesets: 36) | My pleasure! commented 2025-12-08 16:52:43 UTC by LateNightTone ♦57 |
| 173974496 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | Saludos, Las etiquetas que no estan en estandar fueron eliminadas. commented 2025-12-08 16:52:28 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦33 |
| 175593975 (Comments: 3) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 132) | Thank you for your insightful reply. I have contacted the mapper at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131009801 and created a note for others to check. commented 2025-12-08 16:46:27 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 131009801 (Comments: 1) | Yorvik Prestigitator (Discussed changesets: 87) | Thank you for all your helpful mapping work. I see you have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/680120554 as a defibrilator but it still has amenity=telephone as a tag. I assume this is no longer a usable public telephone as descr... commented 2025-12-08 16:45:40 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 175675690 (Comments: 2) | JuanitoPapito (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dankje! commented 2025-12-08 16:45:17 UTC by JuanitoPapito ♦2 |
| 175675640 (Comments: 1) | Zalgirietis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Does the bar only have an indoor section in winter time? commented 2025-12-08 16:30:22 UTC by DodoGTA ♦35 |
| 175645978 (Comments: 2) | yahirthebravo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the hint. I just tried it out. it's neat, I'll use it moving forward. Thank you! commented 2025-12-08 16:28:22 UTC by yahirthebravo ♦1 |
| 175521044 (Comments: 1) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 48) | Please note that in this area, PCRS raster has a far better imagery, making edits easier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=175521044#map=20/47.7631149/-3.3492557 (anyway, your change is fine). commented 2025-12-08 16:24:48 UTC by trial ♦996 |
| 175605321 (Comments: 6) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 111) | I feel like we're talking past each other. I do not disagree with the law or your interpretation of it. However, I disagree with your insistence that any approach to tagging the map other than yours has no validity. The tags that ... commented 2025-12-08 16:21:23 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 175648822 (Comments: 1) | 김응필 (Discussed changesets: 1) | next time, can you break up your changeset by continent? commented 2025-12-08 16:16:12 UTC by synthfi ♦8 |
| 175493902 (Comments: 2) | neffets02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, dem schließe ich mich an. Die maximal zulässige Geschwindigkeit von 10 km/h ist nicht eindeutig korrekt und sollte entfernt werden. Gruß L commented 2025-12-08 16:15:35 UTC by Lokai ♦485 |
| 175662550 (Comments: 2) | Business Rocket (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your support. However, the business name and establishment unit was indeed: "Beheat | Heating Engineer Brussels" as indicated on the public registration form at the Belgian Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (BCE): ... commented 2025-12-08 16:13:46 UTC by Business Rocket ♦2 |
| 175649839 (Comments: 1) | murmeldin (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke! Bitte "erfinde" keine Namen, die in Wirklichkeit Beschreibungen sind. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name commented 2025-12-08 16:13:06 UTC by rohieb ♦131 |
| 175464487 (Comments: 2) | lann (Discussed changesets: 10) | impec 👍 commented 2025-12-08 16:05:07 UTC by trial ♦996 |
| 174321485 (Comments: 3) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Sérieusement ?? Mal cartographier juste pour une "note" donnée par un algorithme bête et méchant ?? Ce n'est pas du tout en accord avec les règles de la communauté car c'est totalement s... commented 2025-12-08 16:03:04 UTC by AurélienQ ♦146 |
| 175623101 (Comments: 1) | MayaDancer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Jeżynowej commented 2025-12-08 15:55:15 UTC by Krystek ♦6 |
| 175674118 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 16) | *service roads. commented 2025-12-08 15:54:29 UTC by MassCartog ♦257 |
| 175672916 (Comments: 1) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Tak swoją drogą - czy wyraz "osiedle" nie powinien być małą literą? commented 2025-12-08 15:53:42 UTC by kubahahaha ♦418 |
| 175668541 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 312) | Błąd Ci się wkradł - numer DW wpisałeś do highway:category:pl commented 2025-12-08 15:49:03 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦827 |
| 175644193 (Comments: 1) | olo_12 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Nie dodajemy „nazw” opisowych do `name` Ten pojemnik nie ma nazwy commented 2025-12-08 15:42:56 UTC by dzamper ♦176 |
| 170325256 (Comments: 1) | swjan (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zerknij może https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083463 commented 2025-12-08 15:34:53 UTC by kubahahaha ♦418 |
| 173077016 (Comments: 2) | Ivan Lievens (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Joost, Waarschijnlijk wel, maar toch om één of andere reden over het hoofd gezien. Ik hoop dat het voor de rest wat meevalt daar in Lebbeke. commented 2025-12-08 15:33:50 UTC by Ivan Lievens ♦8 |
| 175666234 (Comments: 1) | Van01shita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great work! commented 2025-12-08 15:31:46 UTC by d1pper ♦1 |
| 175402778 (Comments: 1) | driesverlinden (Discussed changesets: 10) | Waarom verwijderd u al deze extra tags? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88675526/history/13 + Er is nu een dubbele office=government. Ik haal de extra node weg nu het op het gebouw staat. commented 2025-12-08 15:12:29 UTC by kabelhaai ♦73 |
| 175607343 (Comments: 1) | osmcrsdrv (Discussed changesets: 4) | What's this camera mounted on? Looks like the initial placement on the map is in the middle of a street. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175607343 commented 2025-12-08 15:05:10 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175599411 (Comments: 1) | Chuckles 2 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Is this bicycle=no because of an actual rule or law? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175599411 commented 2025-12-08 15:03:45 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175559566 (Comments: 1) | dbsus (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo zusammen, Wenn ihr wollt, braucht ihr access=yes an Aufzüge und Eingänge von Aufzügen nicht explizit zu setzen, da es per se als default angenommen wird (wie auf allen anderen routebaren Wegen und Punkten auch). Es hei&... commented 2025-12-08 15:02:47 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦10 |
| 174787326 (Comments: 7) | Mludford (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yep, I see the changes now which solve it, thank you! commented 2025-12-08 15:02:45 UTC by Fgjgdrou ♦14 |
| 175655185 (Comments: 1) | queerthoughts (Discussed changesets: 20) | Voor monasteries kan je https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmonastery gebruiken. commented 2025-12-08 14:45:38 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,388 |
| 175604530 (Comments: 1) | aliapo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, aliapo; Thank you very much for your help in updating the OSM maps in Iraq. I noticed that you removed the highway tag from this street (way 755376687), which is incorrect. This is based on JOSM validation, as explained on the OSM wiki page... commented 2025-12-08 14:45:20 UTC by mona_mohsen ♦1 |
| 175652428 (Comments: 1) | R1kyy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo R1kyy, danke für deine Bearbeitungen mit iD! Ein kurzer Hinweis zu diesem Änderungssatz: Er umfasst Änderungen von **Tevel in Ungarn bis nach Monschau in Deutschland**, also über eine sehr große Distanz hinweg. ... commented 2025-12-08 14:37:53 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,992 |
| 164943888 (Comments: 4) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 11) | L'autre note en question : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4377686 commented 2025-12-08 14:34:48 UTC by trial ♦996 |
| 175597389 (Comments: 4) | Trevor_1 (Discussed changesets: 187) | Ok I fixed it commented 2025-12-08 14:26:29 UTC by Trevor_1 ♦272 |
| 175107684 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 167) | Hi, die DB InfraGO selbst verwendet in ihrem Account namens "dbsus" (und viele Bahnmapper) die Schreibweise "DB InfraGO AG". (Beispiel für eine jüngste Bearbeitung durch die DB in der Nähe: https://www... commented 2025-12-08 14:08:15 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦10 |
| 175667246 (Comments: 1) | Paul Morrison ESX (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) Thanks for updating this. For the private section, it should be highway=service rather than highway=secondary (used for B roads). commented 2025-12-08 14:07:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175643969 (Comments: 2) | kaleidoscopica (Discussed changesets: 12) | Sure (sorry, saw this after I just pushed one!) commented 2025-12-08 14:06:18 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦29 |
| 174808451 (Comments: 1) | notsodust (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее ... commented 2025-12-08 14:05:28 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
 | 148919808 (Comments: 2) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 17) | I don't understand why to use motorcycle:repair for motorcycle, service:vehicule:car_repair for cars, service:vehicle:truck_repair for truck and service:bicycle:repair for bicycle : very inconsistent. I think a proposal or discussion is neede... commented 2025-12-08 13:58:44 UTC by Yunan973 ♦82 |
 | 175667009 (Comments: 3) | borovac (Discussed changesets: 63) | It seems to me that everything is fine as it is right now. commented 2025-12-08 13:48:34 UTC by borovac ♦108 |
| 175640821 (Comments: 2) | @win88 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo @Tjuro, OSM kwam zelf met het voorstel van missende tag: education=school dus dat heb ik aangehouden. Zie nu op de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Education_features dat amenity=school goed is en landuse=educat... commented 2025-12-08 13:40:23 UTC by @win88 ♦6 |
| 174061528 (Comments: 1) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 32) | sidewalk:right=separate + sidewalk:left=yes wäre richtig gewesen commented 2025-12-08 13:37:54 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,453 |
| 175452139 (Comments: 1) | Isy26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. * Please accurately outline all buildings. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to othe... commented 2025-12-08 13:37:14 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175659909 (Comments: 2) | AvHMichal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I'm also suprised that "BBOX lockers" have names now. This one, could be found in https://www.bpost.be/en/points-of-sale/Vlaams-Brabant/SINT-PIETERS-LEEUW-1600/BBOX%20LOCKER%20WILDERSPORTCOMPLE Could we use them in OSM? N... commented 2025-12-08 13:35:27 UTC by AvHMichal ♦2 |
| 175661624 (Comments: 2) | captain_slow (Discussed changesets: 47) | Es schaut für mich aktuell nicht so aus als würde gross etwas von meinen Sachen fehlen. Das Einzige was ist, ist, dass die südliche, jetzt im bau befindliche Röhre in deinem Changeset die Version 1 hat, sprich, dass die History we... commented 2025-12-08 13:10:13 UTC by captain_slow ♦68 |
| 174515089 (Comments: 3) | NFZANMNIM (Discussed changesets: 151) | Странно, постановление вышло полтора года назад, но не на одном картографическом ресурсе не обновилось ))) Ну хорошо, только в name:en надо ... commented 2025-12-08 12:53:57 UTC by FUZZY_42 ♦23 |
| 175585250 (Comments: 1) | RyanLittleKing (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your helpful contributions to OpenStreetMap. You have described these changes as "Updates" which is true, but makes it harder for reviewers to understand what you updated and why. Please see https://wiki.openstre... commented 2025-12-08 12:52:11 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 175661879 (Comments: 1) | Saricik (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Poliklinikleri eklerken kat bilgisini girmek istiyorsanız addr:floor etiketi mevcut. Ad(name=*) etiketine yalnızca ad girilmeli. "Ege Üniversitesi KBB Karşıyaka Semt Polikliniği(2. Kat)\t" şeklinde bir ad kullanılmamal... commented 2025-12-08 12:51:16 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦180 |
| 175651551 (Comments: 1) | Nguyen Quang 12178 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear Nguyen Quang 12178, there are a couple of problems with your contributions to OSM: 1. Instead of putting a "." in the changeset comment field, please add a meaningful sentence that describes to other humans what you have done. 2.... commented 2025-12-08 12:46:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,495 |
| 175620322 (Comments: 3) | Bvmz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok :) commented 2025-12-08 12:46:07 UTC by coatix ♦6 |
| 175602682 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 11) | Wrong hgv restriction that was made, was deleted in changeset 175665310. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175665310 commented 2025-12-08 12:37:43 UTC by JakovBušić ♦20 |
| 175660693 (Comments: 3) | freakyfee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi.. Zat eigenlijk meer aan office=ngo te denken. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dngo Mapse.. eggie commented 2025-12-08 12:35:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175566727 (Comments: 1) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 26) | I didn't know there was any open data available to assign postcodes, figured Royal Mail would hold their monopoly forever. Thanks a lot for your work! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2025-12-08 12:34:38 UTC by ExoMal ♦40 |
| 175640067 (Comments: 1) | Saricik (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Bazı yolların etiketini highway=service'ten highway=busway'e çevirmişsiniz. Bu değişikliğinizin doğru olmadığını düşünüyorum. highway=busway etiketinin Viki sayfasında, hangi yolların busway olma... commented 2025-12-08 12:22:34 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦180 |
| 175603538 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hgv restricitions were made by a mistake and deleted in changeset 175664110. commented 2025-12-08 12:10:34 UTC by JakovBušić ♦20 |
| 175599598 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 11) | Wrong hgv restriction was made. Fixed in changeset 175663626. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175663626 commented 2025-12-08 12:03:02 UTC by JakovBušić ♦20 |
| 174636189 (Comments: 5) | wavewings (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for confirming commented 2025-12-08 12:02:52 UTC by PubUpdater ♦10 |
| 175631999 (Comments: 1) | vinvisval (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ciao vinvisval, per i tag distance, duration:backward,duration:forward e gli altri se il dato non è conosciuto, non va inserito. Valori pari a zero possono essere interpretati come dati mancanti o errati e generano problemi nei s... commented 2025-12-08 11:53:50 UTC by Andrea Del Sarto ♦79 |
| 155841906 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 110) | not sure what you mean - and it seems unrelated to edit made here you may want to ask on https://community.openstreetmap.org/ commented 2025-12-08 11:48:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175542604 (Comments: 2) | Gigi479 (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you are interested in editing hiking routes (or other kind of routes), you may educate yourself about how this is done properly: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking Guido commented 2025-12-08 11:48:17 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 174458237 (Comments: 3) | olehz (Discussed changesets: 208) | seems to not be commented 2025-12-08 11:45:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 18433183 (Comments: 4) | ds500ss (Discussed changesets: 1) | > what exactly went wrong? now difference is not visible, as osm.org changed how linking works few months ago first links (without https prefix) were not working commented 2025-12-08 11:45:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175127739 (Comments: 7) | wielandb (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks for the input. As stated previously, I am not actively tagging anything new. With this challenge, I am just converting data that is already there. I am not adding parking:*=yes to anything where data implicating that fact wasn't availa... commented 2025-12-08 11:42:19 UTC by wielandb ♦140 |
| 175656971 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 312) | Czy na nowym odcinku S7 nie ma znaków drogi ekspresowej? commented 2025-12-08 11:30:36 UTC by Yunkers ♦405 |
| 175576030 (Comments: 4) | söm4324 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Alles klar, danke! commented 2025-12-08 11:29:26 UTC by söm4324 ♦52 |
| 175661008 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 116) | El nombre de la plazuela aparece en un mosaico de azulejos situado sobre la fachada de uno de los edificios de la plaza. commented 2025-12-08 11:28:26 UTC by dcapillae ♦384 |
| 175661092 (Comments: 1) | able-macaroni-pacemaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset was intended to modify the lock, not the canal. Could someone please revert my changeset and reapply the changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129948358? commented 2025-12-08 11:26:23 UTC by able-macaroni-pacemaker ♦1 |
| 175656599 (Comments: 3) | davcen80 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nessun problema, ho sistemato il numero di corsie, e un attraversamento che era segnato come non pavimentato in asfaltato. commented 2025-12-08 11:23:27 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,800 |
| 174242578 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Peiron (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Il existe deux Montagnes des Fours Bas, est-ce un choix délibéré de ne pas en supprimer une ? Bonne journée ! commented 2025-12-08 11:21:21 UTC by Swic ♦28 |
| 175266653 (Comments: 6) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 91) | No worries, it was probably a mistake of mine to remove then commented 2025-12-08 11:17:27 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦351 |
| 175278329 (Comments: 3) | danill2001 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Откатил эту часть commented 2025-12-08 11:10:34 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 172552746 (Comments: 3) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ups, falsch geschieben. Es war bei Position: 48.210543, 16.225513 commented 2025-12-08 11:10:09 UTC by vikiawv ♦28 |
| 175651321 (Comments: 1) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 58) | Netjes zo, welbedankt! commented 2025-12-08 11:03:46 UTC by Jan Olieslagers ♦209 |
| 175589612 (Comments: 3) | NeisReview (Discussed changesets: 6) | Sehr geehrter Herr, Grund für die Änderungen: Alle diese Standorte wurden bereits verschoben. Daher habe ich die Änderungen vorgenommen und angegeben, dass sie an diesem Standort nicht mehr vorhanden sind. Dies diente d... commented 2025-12-08 11:02:58 UTC by Sara1000 ♦6 |
| 175488368 (Comments: 2) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ciao Guido e grazie per le segnalazioni. Fra tante modifiche qualcosina di errato può capitare. L'importante sarebbe monitorare più frequentemente geofabrik per tenere sotto controllo gli eventuali errori, che, cosa importante, com... commented 2025-12-08 10:57:34 UTC by Lola Fox ♦38 |
| 175157321 (Comments: 1) | Pyknite (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello. You have placed the barriers directly on the SS301 second-class road. I don't know the exact situation on site, but shouldn't the barrier be somewhere on the old abandoned road? The barriers prevent planning along the SS301 second... commented 2025-12-08 10:50:01 UTC by Petr Fukátko ♦20 |
| 175632113 (Comments: 1) | vinvisval (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ciao. Ti sconsiglio vivamente di inserire dati di cui non conosci il valore esatto! ascent=0 descent=0 distance=0 duration:backward=0 duration:forward=0 rwn:name=0 survey:date=0 website=0 Non sono dati imprecisi... commented 2025-12-08 10:48:12 UTC by Jrachi ♦810 |
| 175605711 (Comments: 1) | vinvisval (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ciao. I REI deve essere a 8 caratteri. Forse manca uno zero finale? commented 2025-12-08 10:45:34 UTC by Jrachi ♦810 |
| 175659209 (Comments: 1) | UW Maddie (Discussed changesets: 39) | If some of the curbs look like they don't match aerial imagery, that's because I used the latest 2025 mapillary images to verify the newly constructed curbs commented 2025-12-08 10:30:10 UTC by UW Maddie ♦28 |
| 175631531 (Comments: 1) | Adrian Shobrooke (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Adrian, check this, please. You clustered these 3 buildings. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456718057/history#map=19/12.161863/15.116262 Check this as well. Complete plot as 1 building. A big part is a courtyard. https://www.o... commented 2025-12-08 10:20:55 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175616097 (Comments: 2) | xotoxot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank je wel! commented 2025-12-08 10:10:24 UTC by xotoxot ♦1 |
| 175640261 (Comments: 1) | PawełKirsz (Discussed changesets: 1) | proszę przestać zmieniać nazwę na nieprawdziwą commented 2025-12-08 10:08:55 UTC by zuicz ♦292 |
| 175643291 (Comments: 3) | Aight 2009 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Te ustalenia są spisane tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic commented 2025-12-08 09:58:16 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦827 |
| 175320747 (Comments: 1) | lukavj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich habe den Fußweg korrigiert, sodass dieser mit der Germergasse verbunden ist und nicht mit der Grenze der Katastralgemeinden. Ist der Durchgang allerdings tatsächlich für alle frei benutzbar, oder nur für die Bew... commented 2025-12-08 09:52:13 UTC by Luzandro ♦958 |
| 175656802 (Comments: 1) | ffff23 (Discussed changesets: 7) | コメント:建物を追加修正 source:bing;Esri commented 2025-12-08 09:45:48 UTC by ffff23 ♦10 |
| 175523308 (Comments: 3) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dziękuję, pamiętaj żeby dawać takie informacje w opisie zestawów zmian zamiast "poprawiłem okolicę". Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-08 09:39:35 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 170540525 (Comments: 3) | AlmostSurelyRob (Discussed changesets: 5) | * I should *not* be taking wiki too literally, I meant. commented 2025-12-08 09:24:05 UTC by AlmostSurelyRob ♦5 |
| 164935641 (Comments: 1) | fishgoat (Discussed changesets: 1) | 好像是改成金沙隧道了吧？ commented 2025-12-08 09:20:26 UTC by qBittorrent ♦1 |
| 175621927 (Comments: 2) | godarklight (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, I'll update all the roads inside the airport to private, because it will still route from the north (old airport terminal) to the runway. commented 2025-12-08 09:00:20 UTC by godarklight ♦1 |
| 175600292 (Comments: 5) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | That makes sense. Thank you for reminding me that we all have different mapping styles. In case you don't know about it, HDYC is a useful tool for keeping track of discussions that haven't been replied to (amongst other things): ... commented 2025-12-08 08:58:06 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 175237096 (Comments: 5) | kiwilecker (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich persönlich würde es begrüßen, wenn man wenigstens auf die InfraGO aktualisierte Tags einfach so belässt, wie sie sind, egal ob mit dem "AG" oder ohne, wenn man sich schon nicht einigen kann, welcher Tag es letz... commented 2025-12-08 08:40:33 UTC by stoerte ♦19 |
| 175410402 (Comments: 11) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | Yes, that's how sentences work, you can say one thing and then qualify it with another. "It is sunny today but there will be rain around 2pm." Facetiousness aside, a typical case is https://cycle.travel/map?from=&to=&fro... commented 2025-12-08 08:36:12 UTC by Richard ♦223 |
| 175568542 (Comments: 2) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 25) | The tags change every 2-3 months, it seems, so probably not "continuously". Some of the information is required to be able to unambiguously reconcile routes. When the OSM routes are (mostly) completed in NSW, it will be time to take stock o... commented 2025-12-08 08:29:17 UTC by donmac703 ♦11 |
| 175444270 (Comments: 4) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 12) | Super! Le csv de JungleBus rentre bien dans QGIS, plus qu'à m'y mettre, merci bien! commented 2025-12-08 08:25:28 UTC by NikoJorj ♦5 |
| 171667541 (Comments: 5) | EfreetSK (Discussed changesets: 6) | No čo sa týka tej zóny tak je to väčšie, z auta som si nevšimol že by začínala na križovatke so Železničnou. A dnes ráno som pozrel že Žitavská ju má tiež. No keď budem mať niek... commented 2025-12-08 08:12:28 UTC by EfreetSK ♦12 |
| 175643579 (Comments: 1) | MDuiker (Discussed changesets: 2) | De ingangen heb ik vastgemaakt aan de gebouwomtrek. (Ze lagen binnen het gebouw) Wellicht even checken of de positie juist is. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-08 08:07:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175643398 (Comments: 1) | MDuiker (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De ingangen heb ik vastgemaakt aan de gebouwomtrek. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-08 08:05:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 164414287 (Comments: 1) | Jan Olieslagers (Discussed changesets: 98) | Goedendag mijnheer Olieslagers, In de vorige wijzigingenset had ik de naam van de CLUB aan de adresnode getagd, maar ik vond geen naam van het VELD op hun website. Net als bij veel sportclubs: de naam van de club aan de node en de naam van het spo... commented 2025-12-08 07:59:32 UTC by Op'tRad ♦51 |
 | 175584684 (Comments: 2) | kenken234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Or perhaps make the station have the role=station for the relation, I'm not sure exactly what the bug is here. Check other valid subway networks on the validator for working examples. Thanks again! commented 2025-12-08 07:58:43 UTC by orthocircular ♦122 |
| 175632823 (Comments: 1) | d00blin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12197780550/ Where is this clock? commented 2025-12-08 07:54:42 UTC by VictorIE ♦974 |
| 175510650 (Comments: 2) | wavewings (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yeah that doesn't look right. The road leading from Berth 1 seems to be 20km/h. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=775147994864905 , I'm not sure if that applies at the roundabout as well but it probably indicates a low speed aro... commented 2025-12-08 07:49:00 UTC by wavewings ♦6 |
| 173867255 (Comments: 1) | SiannaD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Many problems with the footpath Way: 1445697788. It crosses over highways and buildings, for the most part along lines of existing paths. Thus I;ve removed it. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-08 07:47:20 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175631549 (Comments: 2) | dariuspi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sveiki. Aišku, ačiū. commented 2025-12-08 07:40:26 UTC by dariuspi ♦1 |
| 175651707 (Comments: 1) | UW Maddie (Discussed changesets: 39) | If some of the curbs look like they don't match aerial imagery, that's because I used the latest 2025 mapillary images to verify the newly constructed curbs commented 2025-12-08 07:35:27 UTC by UW Maddie ♦28 |
| 174766641 (Comments: 2) | trailschneck (Discussed changesets: 62) | Danke, hab den falschen gelöscht commented 2025-12-08 07:29:41 UTC by trailschneck ♦51 |
| 175607993 (Comments: 1) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 13) | I've removed several long sections og duplicated highway as this dirupts routing. Please amend correct the existing highway. commented 2025-12-08 07:26:03 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175344030 (Comments: 3) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 51) | No biggie! If there was indeed a reduction in the number of lines then all could be well! Just check the subway validator (I think the one at vk.com runs often) after making rapid transit changes. CoMaps' runs a few times a month. commented 2025-12-08 07:23:25 UTC by orthocircular ♦122 |
| 175608239 (Comments: 2) | nitin PVT LTD (Discussed changesets: 13) | You are still making duplicate highways, which will disrupt routing. Please amend/correct existing features, not just draw over them. commented 2025-12-08 07:21:19 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175636133 (Comments: 1) | Lonestargut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3621209058 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-08 07:07:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175606526 (Comments: 1) | Almir Muji (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, what kind of hydrant is this? commented 2025-12-08 07:05:07 UTC by the_third_man ♦3 |
| 175476119 (Comments: 3) | Freiwillige Feuerwehr Tengen (Discussed changesets: 4) | anstelle "name=Löschwasserbehälter Stihl" alternativ operator=Stihl description=Löschwasserbehälter verwenden. commented 2025-12-08 06:51:27 UTC by plennert ♦92 |
| 175647040 (Comments: 1) | KyanJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/65523264 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-08 06:42:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175631795 (Comments: 2) | Aeexly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо за информацию. commented 2025-12-08 06:36:26 UTC by Aeexly ♦1 |
| 175606407 (Comments: 1) | Peter Motte (Discussed changesets: 3) | A single tree is not a wood. commented 2025-12-08 06:27:49 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175553857 (Comments: 2) | Rdeipenau (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175553973 commented 2025-12-08 06:00:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 174933403 (Comments: 7) | likeToTravel (Discussed changesets: 4) | We are not talking about the name of the path, but about the spelling. Please refer to the wiki https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names; even the abbreviation is undesirable. commented 2025-12-08 05:59:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 175645416 (Comments: 1) | SEO JEONG HOON (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted unwarranted deletions of industrial facilities. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19126 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175648931 commented 2025-12-08 05:33:51 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175645268 (Comments: 1) | SEO JEONG HOON (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted unwarranted deletions of industrial facilities. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19126 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175648931 commented 2025-12-08 05:33:50 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,580 |
| 175479968 (Comments: 1) | RobertS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175479968 commented 2025-12-08 05:10:37 UTC by jmarchon ♦438 |
| 175473980 (Comments: 1) | Sequoia626 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks good1 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175473980 commented 2025-12-08 05:09:30 UTC by jmarchon ♦438 |
| 175088894 (Comments: 1) | Mirko Drensek (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hola, las parada se mapean en su ubicación real, normalmente sobre la vereda, no en el way. commented 2025-12-08 04:35:52 UTC by AgusQui ♦618 |
| 175549404 (Comments: 1) | Naveena Roshika (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). From a privacy angle, do not add personalised house names. You need to add proper road nam... commented 2025-12-08 04:33:08 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦601 |
| 175623376 (Comments: 1) | GoVeganNow (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo GoVeganNow, hier hast Du im Haltestellenbereich eine Linie eingezeichnet (Weg: 1365258754) ohne jede Funktion? Im Haltestellenbereich wechselt der Radweg lediglich für ca. 80 m auf die Zeitstrasse! https://www.mapillary.com/app/... commented 2025-12-08 04:28:55 UTC by pitfire ♦709 |
| 175647298 (Comments: 1) | Zuborg2012 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 先停一下，朋友，你似乎对OSM的标签定义有点理解上的偏差 osm的住宅区也好社区也好小区也好不要只看中文译名，看原始tag的语义和osmwiki的用法。 此外你的道路，在小区内用的全是省... commented 2025-12-08 04:28:04 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦566 |
| 175602282 (Comments: 1) | lbrow23 (Discussed changesets: 2) | How do you have time for this whole massive area??? commented 2025-12-08 04:24:38 UTC by JasiahMaps1010 ♦4 |
| 175643004 (Comments: 2) | MadCat3D (Discussed changesets: 1) | nope, that was a mistake, not sure how I did that but I will fix that, thanks for pointing that out. commented 2025-12-08 03:57:01 UTC by MadCat3D ♦2 |
 | 175463518 (Comments: 2) | NGlf (Discussed changesets: 6) | My bad, it was carried through copy/paste from another node. I found 3 more instances and corrected these also, thanks for spoting. commented 2025-12-08 03:50:48 UTC by NGlf ♦12 |
| 175623241 (Comments: 1) | GoVeganNow (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo GoVeganNow, danke für Deine Nachträge, aber traffic_sign=DE:241 gibt es in zwei Varianten: https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE?signs=DE:241-30;241-31 und die Nutzung ist nur in eine Richtung erlaubt. VG pitfire... commented 2025-12-08 03:49:32 UTC by pitfire ♦709 |
| 175645343 (Comments: 1) | Rick sanches (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, and welcome to OSM! I see you added a Flock camera in a parking lot, but I don't think the camera is here. Could you please adjust the camera's geometry to be along the road? commented 2025-12-08 03:48:19 UTC by QuiLe ♦15 |
| 141001003 (Comments: 2) | skfd (Discussed changesets: 22) | no objection from me, makes absolute sense! commented 2025-12-08 03:38:12 UTC by skfd ♦284 |
| 175646180 (Comments: 1) | chumpy100 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey thanks for your contribution! in the future please square up your tennis courts, you can do this by pressing Q if your using the iD editor on OpenStreatMap.org --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmc... commented 2025-12-08 03:27:53 UTC by patmorgan235 ♦3 |
| 175644012 (Comments: 3) | BB12345 (Discussed changesets: 7) | OK - I see you have just edited the section south to 90. I was worried you had a section of 90 between two 80's commented 2025-12-08 03:16:20 UTC by tastrax ♦1,179 |
| 174902307 (Comments: 2) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 38) | are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13319087502 in fact has a monument? Or is it only event location? commented 2025-12-08 01:59:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 174286268 (Comments: 4) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 15) | or have you intended it to mean something? or should it be simply deleted? commented 2025-12-08 01:56:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 146324882 (Comments: 3) | emersonveenstra (Discussed changesets: 75) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-08 01:55:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 105730281 (Comments: 1) | El Gaout Rachid (Discussed changesets: 1) | si rachid vous nous avez rempli la map de poteaux métalliques ajoutés en tant que bureaux, un grand bravo commented 2025-12-08 01:46:20 UTC by ilias_ ♦385 |
| 117336427 (Comments: 2) | KB-01 (Discussed changesets: 37) | That was me converting "maxweight = 33 Tons" into standard metric tons because I didn't know how to properly tag US short tons. maxweight = 33 st would be more appropriate. commented 2025-12-08 01:21:08 UTC by KB-01 ♦26 |
| 175410763 (Comments: 3) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ok, thanks for clarifying! commented 2025-12-08 01:19:17 UTC by B972025 ♦25 |
| 175592282 (Comments: 1) | Fan7787 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Please specify a source for new roads commented 2025-12-08 01:10:05 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,140 |
| 175480080 (Comments: 1) | tjsimmo85 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please don't add fictional information into OSM. The farmland here should be drawn as individual plots, and the name and operator should only be added if this is (real) publicly known information. --- ... commented 2025-12-08 00:53:28 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,441 |
| 175644562 (Comments: 1) | lasagna (Discussed changesets: 12) | Additional sources: https://www.bawsca.org/uploads/userfiles/files/2024%20State%20of%20the%20Regional%20Water%20System%20Report_Final%202024-12-05_5PM.pdf https://www.nps.gov/yose/getinvolved/hetchyproject.htm Bing Streetside commented 2025-12-08 00:43:38 UTC by lasagna ♦45 |
| 175452832 (Comments: 3) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 15) | Minta tolong dibantu langsung di edit saja commented 2025-12-08 00:35:10 UTC by w_djatmiko ♦8 |
| 175339246 (Comments: 1) | sconner1987 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello sconner1987, and welcome to Openstreetmap! I just have an FYI about your change here - Unless "Maintenance" is the official name of this building, please don't tag it as such. You could retag the building as a shed, maybe, but pl... commented 2025-12-08 00:11:55 UTC by I-76 ♦41 |
| 175644133 (Comments: 1) | Grazing6603 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://comune.brignanofrascata.al.it/it-it/vivere-il-comune/scheda commented 2025-12-08 00:09:41 UTC by Grazing6603 ♦1 |
| 166769674 (Comments: 1) | Capibarablu21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12864267956 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12864267957 2 issues : palm is not a species, it's a taxon=Arecaceae a tree can't be genus=Prunus and taxon=Arecaceae/Palm, it is not t... commented 2025-12-08 00:06:55 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 175498805 (Comments: 2) | Diez Hombre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revierto tras aclarar el error vía mensaje privado. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175643981 commented 2025-12-07 23:59:59 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦362 |
| 175497869 (Comments: 2) | Diez Hombre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revierto tras aclarar el error vía mensaje privado. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175643973 commented 2025-12-07 23:59:31 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦362 |
| 175604975 (Comments: 1) | IsCoffeeTho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this looks pretty good, the only thing I would add is that it would be best to split the way where the tunnels are, and remove the tunnel=yes tag from any parts that aren't tunnels. --- Published... commented 2025-12-07 23:54:20 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,441 |
| 175595315 (Comments: 5) | extua (Discussed changesets: 5) | fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175643734 commented 2025-12-07 23:48:48 UTC by extua ♦6 |
| 175640340 (Comments: 1) | CDP1 (Discussed changesets: 5) | hi you have dragged the tree into the ocean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13332744765/history commented 2025-12-07 23:33:22 UTC by aharvey ♦1,900 |
| 175624789 (Comments: 1) | Meatba11s (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this address. If you know the area well, then it would be great to add the other buildings and there addresses as well? Also if the construction work is finished we should be able to update the roads to re... commented 2025-12-07 23:15:51 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 173776669 (Comments: 3) | Jojolaglandouille (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Guido, Yes, there were a few invalid relations, I've just fixed them. Thanks for letting me know. commented 2025-12-07 23:11:49 UTC by Jojolaglandouille ♦2 |
| 175543133 (Comments: 1) | gracar2002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, looks good. Do you have any questions? commented 2025-12-07 23:02:00 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 174165763 (Comments: 1) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Ist DB Lounge wirklich die Marke? Ich hatte die Berichterstattung [1] so verstanden, dass das einfach ein offener Wartebereich ist, und ja ein neues Konzept (war also wahrscheinlich vor einem Monat nicht zu erkennen). Auch beim Vorbeigehen ha... commented 2025-12-07 22:59:10 UTC by jkoe ♦5 |
 | 175363914 (Comments: 7) | 4004 (Discussed changesets: 120) | да, на счет каждого случая соглашусь, но если постройка часть комплекса, то имеет смысл обьединить. лямус в Гродно - коммон нейм, поэтом... commented 2025-12-07 22:56:33 UTC by 4004 ♦1,928 |
| 174316240 (Comments: 3) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 19) | If you hadn't tuned out of the thread immediately, you'd have noticed that the general majority landed on there's no reason to remove them, and they are useful for data consumers. commented 2025-12-07 22:55:02 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175412527 (Comments: 1) | James Wheare (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jmes, this looks good to me! commented 2025-12-07 22:53:13 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175642628 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10766675478 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-12-07 22:51:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175614682 (Comments: 3) | Lysol90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tack för svar och snabb ändring! commented 2025-12-07 22:29:44 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦627 |
| 175641542 (Comments: 1) | olsen3737 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Obydwa zestawy zmian wycofane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175642327 Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-07 22:27:56 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 66372894 (Comments: 1) | Mimac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravim, preco je bazen turistickou atrakciou? A hlavne ked je pristupny iba zakaznikom hotela? commented 2025-12-07 22:22:37 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,750 |
| 175558580 (Comments: 4) | Moepmoep (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke. Jetzt sind die Wege auch aus der Kartenansicht verschwunden. commented 2025-12-07 22:19:39 UTC by george1201 ♦251 |
| 175356127 (Comments: 1) | Superstore Media (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this is tagged as leisure=fitness_centre sport=boxing I think the more normal way of doing this is to use leisure=sports_centre as well as sport = (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre ) commented 2025-12-07 22:17:15 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175583957 (Comments: 3) | RyanLittleKing (Discussed changesets: 2) | I meant to do lanes I'll fix that commented 2025-12-07 22:07:55 UTC by RyanLittleKing ♦1 |
| 175611576 (Comments: 1) | smartsammler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo smartsammler, du hast für die Pizzeria einen neuen Knoten angelegt. In dem Gebäude gab es schon einen leerstehenden Frisörladen, im Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5046880012. Hat die Pizzeria nicht die Frisör-R... commented 2025-12-07 21:53:47 UTC by george1201 ♦251 |
| 175639381 (Comments: 1) | Bogus181 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jaki jest cel dodawania i od razu usuwania tych punktów? commented 2025-12-07 21:06:32 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 174021564 (Comments: 1) | marcus_jenkins (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, why did you create a power plant that is proposed and not under construction? could not you add a note with the information so it could be added in the future when the construction starts? Have you made more editions like this? Regards commented 2025-12-07 21:04:25 UTC by kapazao ♦954 |
| 175638210 (Comments: 2) | Pandahero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Positie veranderen is geen probleem. commented 2025-12-07 21:00:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175338821 (Comments: 2) | AlexM51 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. I'm thinking about better tagging for different services and finally choose "service:name" which can be localized in standard way. Local train routes in Japan often too short to classify as regional. commented 2025-12-07 20:59:32 UTC by AlexM51 ♦3 |
| 175639902 (Comments: 1) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 43) | Accidentally uploaded without specifying "import", I only noticed it after clicking Upload and the Cancel button did nothing thanks JOSM commented 2025-12-07 20:58:44 UTC by Sharko_J ♦98 |
| 175454381 (Comments: 3) | saunter (Discussed changesets: 56) | Thanks, I fixed those issues https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175639988 commented 2025-12-07 20:57:19 UTC by saunter ♦17 |
| 172773729 (Comments: 6) | Nzau (Discussed changesets: 73) | N'hésitez pas à faire des modifs directement ^^ commented 2025-12-07 20:52:29 UTC by Nzau ♦145 |
| 175637113 (Comments: 1) | xBitsNL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag xBitsNL, Lijkt me helemaal oke zo. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 20:26:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175632045 (Comments: 1) | OP13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag OP13, Ik heb het iets aangepast bij het bruggetje en NL:G11 tagging toegevoegd. Zie ook https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.23978,6.641196,20/?datastrip=20251124_PNEO-03 Mapse, eggie commented 2025-12-07 20:23:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174021676 (Comments: 3) | Bocian999 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Usunąłem i naniosłem zgodnie ze stanem w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 20:18:02 UTC by uprkos ♦76 |
 | 175056077 (Comments: 23) | RLakhani (Discussed changesets: 29) | > As a road does not connect across the border, as in the numerous examples above, your claim is wrong. You cannot cross here for literally 60 years. This is not a temporary closure as the examples you compared it to. Yeah, and Pakistani&#... commented 2025-12-07 20:12:35 UTC by Jacksonville ♦25 |
| 175637316 (Comments: 1) | Cat2006 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Здравей, Това не са самостоятелни университети, поради което им бях сложил amenity=faculty. И аз бих искал да се показват на картата, но не е о... commented 2025-12-07 20:09:38 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦754 |
| 175635535 (Comments: 1) | De Lage Linie - Professionele coaching en therapie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage, Ik heb wat aangepast zodat het straks te zien zal zijn op de kaart. Format postcode en phone aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 20:08:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 156923851 (Comments: 1) | Baumschrat (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356930014/history has shop = wheelchair that was added in this edit shop=wheelchair ? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=medical_supply ? If yes, what is the di... commented 2025-12-07 20:07:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 172981669 (Comments: 1) | ellaisabellacat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12823859387/history has shop = smoke that was added in this edit Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=headshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2025-12-07 20:05:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 162635200 (Comments: 1) | DHRUV BHARADWAJ (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12596600129 - is it selling only batteries? By name it seem to sell also invertors. Is it selling also solar pannels? commented 2025-12-07 20:04:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 128444727 (Comments: 1) | Linz8444 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10154905549/history has shop = home_improvement that was added in this edit Is it shop=doityourself ? If not, how it differs from shop=doityourself? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityou... commented 2025-12-07 20:01:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175615436 (Comments: 3) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 151) | Ok, danke für die Klarstellung commented 2025-12-07 20:01:00 UTC by kadiwa ♦52 |
| 168743838 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hej. Skąd źródło tej nazwy? W Polskim Rejestrze Nazw Geograficznych to wzgórze nie ma nazwy. commented 2025-12-07 20:00:29 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 168372819 (Comments: 2) | larsdahlin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Have changed osm.org/node/12967280400/history . It was the effect in the charging pole. commented 2025-12-07 20:00:13 UTC by larsdahlin ♦1 |
| 175632520 (Comments: 1) | dcenkuwibeks (Discussed changesets: 3) | Diese Haltestellenposition hat nur noch einen Mast mittig für alle Linien, seit kein SEV der U2 mehr ist. Die Busse fahren auch bis hier hin vor. Den alten südlichen Mast (wo jetzt nur noch der Monitor hängt) konnte ich ... commented 2025-12-07 19:58:12 UTC by dcenkuwibeks ♦2 |
| 168744923 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hej. Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy? Kolejne pytanie - ta góreczka według numerycznego modelu terenu jest tylko o 5m wyższa od otaczającego terenu. Czy oznaczanie tego typu obiektów ma sens? commented 2025-12-07 19:57:42 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 161983358 (Comments: 2) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 152) | Hi, yes definitely. I fixed it now. Thanks for notice. commented 2025-12-07 19:50:47 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦225 |
| 172559284 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Poprawiłem na natural=hill https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:natural%3Dhill commented 2025-12-07 19:48:18 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 175604808 (Comments: 1) | Jiblolds (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please don't blindly accept the recommendations from the editor to change the names of features. The proper name, as in the one that goes in the `name=*` tag, should be in french in Quebec, regardless of what the editor tries to suggest commented 2025-12-07 19:46:27 UTC by wolfy1339 ♦38 |
| 172414011 (Comments: 6) | DLRLA2025BI (Discussed changesets: 3) | Apologies for an incorrect statement I made 2 days ago. The signage (even if outdated and inconsistent) is present between Rheinhausen and Rußheim. That was an oversight on my side when I was writing my response. As of Nove... commented 2025-12-07 19:40:03 UTC by DLRLA2025BI ♦1 |
| 172559138 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175637244 commented 2025-12-07 19:38:53 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 155484309 (Comments: 1) | WakefieldMapper (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776541567/history has shop = bus that was added in this edit shop=bus ? What is sold here? bus tickets? bus vehicles? something else? commented 2025-12-07 19:38:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 169599518 (Comments: 1) | StephaneP (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13031061398/history has shop = bus that was added in this edit shop=bus ? What is sold here? bus tickets? bus vehicles? something else? commented 2025-12-07 19:38:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 168188228 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hej. Jakie jest źródło nazwy tego wzniesienia? Numeryczny model terenu nie pokazuje w tym miejscu więcej niż 230m, więc skąd wysokość 235m? commented 2025-12-07 19:37:56 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 168251795 (Comments: 1) | Andy6325 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12960570334/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 156098641 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Heimburgg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12151592164/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 130716525 (Comments: 1) | niklashan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10296641791/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 158454130 (Comments: 1) | werbefläche (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12293859683/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175592661 (Comments: 2) | Peter Hanecak (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK, vdaka za upozornenie. commented 2025-12-07 19:34:29 UTC by Peter Hanecak ♦2 |
| 175098342 (Comments: 1) | sasa15081980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravo sasa15081980, Dobrodošao u OSM zajednicu. Pohvale za dodavanje detalja o objektima na mapu. Da li ti je potrebna neka pomoć? Ukoliko želiš da kontaktiraš sa drugim maperima u Srbiji to možeš da urad... commented 2025-12-07 19:32:46 UTC by MaliMrav ♦63 |
| 174056437 (Comments: 4) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 38) | Regarding historically significant sites, I have doubts if they should be mapped on OSM or not. I opened the discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-historically-significan-sites-without-physical-representation/139032 |
| 175636375 (Comments: 1) | ParadoX_ZLWC (Discussed changesets: 328) | Hello, thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks and happy mapping! commented 2025-12-07 19:16:40 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦43 |
| 175468426 (Comments: 1) | Mrksmlk (Discussed changesets: 16) | O dzięki, przegapiłem jakoś commented 2025-12-07 19:15:39 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦30 |
| 119475654 (Comments: 3) | ibanez (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ah danke, das habe ich übersehen! commented 2025-12-07 19:14:32 UTC by rohieb ♦131 |
| 175634929 (Comments: 1) | dcenkuwibeks (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sehr schön gemappt! :) Aber nicht vergessen, den vorher an der Straße eingetragenen Gehweg und Radweg wieder auszutragen (Hab ich jetzt gemacht). Und ich habe die vorher eingetragene Gehwegoberfläche auf den neuen Gehweg übertrag... commented 2025-12-07 19:12:07 UTC by kadiwa ♦52 |
| 174478596 (Comments: 4) | rusjanis (Discussed changesets: 12) | Skaidrs, pielaboju. Tas ir planter box "puķpods". Šim te pagriezienam arī except=bicycle jāliek, citādi velo arī aizliedz https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19805014 . Drausmīgs tiktoks... commented 2025-12-07 19:06:16 UTC by HellMap ♦780 |
| 175622720 (Comments: 1) | Marius Brüser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Wenn kein Schild vorhanden ist, hat sich die Erfassung von fire_hydrant:diameter:signed=no ref:signed=no eingebürgert. Unter anderem fragt dann die App StreetComplete ni... commented 2025-12-07 18:56:21 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175604706 (Comments: 9) | Sara1000 (Discussed changesets: 11) | The reason for the changes is that all these places have been moved to another location. commented 2025-12-07 18:50:34 UTC by Sara1000 ♦6 |
| 175595624 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 11) | The node that was accidentally created was deleted in changeset 175635551 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175635551 commented 2025-12-07 18:41:38 UTC by JakovBušić ♦20 |
| 175624249 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo675675 (Discussed changesets: 1) | В названии должно быть только название, без типа объекта и/или ключевых слов. Я верну как было. commented 2025-12-07 18:30:39 UTC by fndoder ♦105 |
| 175354055 (Comments: 4) | Antplanproje (Discussed changesets: 2) | teşekkürler telegram üzerinden talepte bulundum, commented 2025-12-07 18:27:02 UTC by Antplanproje ♦2 |
| 175451076 (Comments: 1) | Yaaaaaaaa (Discussed changesets: 52) | Salut Yann, Je pense que ton node est un doublon de celui là node/13302415440, antérieur de quelques jours. Et je vois que la zone mériterait un coup de polish vu les travaux : le parking way/332873737 (et le chemin way/120... commented 2025-12-07 18:24:01 UTC by LudovicG ♦107 |
| 175521764 (Comments: 3) | tjnakano (Discussed changesets: 118) | I’ve reverted this change (as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175634900) as above. Happy to chat if you think the reasoning above is incorrect :) commented 2025-12-07 18:21:47 UTC by gurglypipe ♦958 |
| 175577086 (Comments: 6) | Denis_Helfer (Discussed changesets: 72) | Ok Merci commented 2025-12-07 18:20:22 UTC by michel60 ♦91 |
| 175621580 (Comments: 5) | akiaida (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2025-12-07 18:12:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174423070 (Comments: 1) | Elliot12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175634608 commented 2025-12-07 18:10:21 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,507 |
| 175634005 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Revert 175126040 commented 2025-12-07 17:55:15 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦827 |
| 173697375 (Comments: 2) | Dblcut3 (Discussed changesets: 21) | on further update, the building construction tag should only be used when the building actually exists and has 4 walls, near completion, so i have deleted it; the landuse=construction surrounding the site is still there and applicable. commented 2025-12-07 17:40:54 UTC by skorasaurus ♦217 |
| 147970865 (Comments: 1) | mapboy63 (Discussed changesets: 2) | In the spirit of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I suggest it makes sense to only map Chorltonville once, not twice. The feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107039785 with identical tag... commented 2025-12-07 17:34:06 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 157769805 (Comments: 3) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 68) | Sprawdzone. Poprawione. Tory nie zostały usunięte. commented 2025-12-07 17:29:34 UTC by rademalis ♦5 |
| 173986890 (Comments: 3) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 960) | le soucis est que les valeurs erronées/périmé étaient deja dans osm et osmose ne gère que les tags qu'ils connait (il ne connait pas encore la puissance des prises, cela arrive bientot j'espère) ... commented 2025-12-07 17:16:15 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 158766667 (Comments: 7) | BrackoNe (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hvala! commented 2025-12-07 17:16:10 UTC by BrackoNe ♦111 |
| 175631491 (Comments: 2) | berenluth (Discussed changesets: 2) | dai un occhio qui se hai dubbi! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses commented 2025-12-07 17:03:47 UTC by McCio ♦12 |
| 175631670 (Comments: 1) | berenluth (Discussed changesets: 2) | il sito è meglio metterlo completo, in questo caso https://www.casecarlet.it/ (senza www pare che non lo trovi) commented 2025-12-07 17:02:23 UTC by McCio ♦12 |
| 175628745 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, It looks like you redrew some buildings in Cranfield (England), drew a couple of structures in the north-east of Scotland and added a trail in North Korea. As a consequence, your change is now showing as a huge bounding box sprea... commented 2025-12-07 16:55:13 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 175631511 (Comments: 2) | javl (Discussed changesets: 5) | .. landuse in Park Molenbeke hersteld. Wanneer het overwegend gras is kun je ook grass taggen en dan losse bomen toevoegen. De naam staat dus op de laag leisure=park die overal overheen ligt. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-07 16:54:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175267436 (Comments: 1) | Decorator1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I commented about this before, but tree canopies of individual trees shouldn't be mapped as landuse=forest, use tree nodes instead. commented 2025-12-07 16:31:38 UTC by Sakari_N ♦99 |
| 175568670 (Comments: 2) | Apathetic_Engineer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh good point. I was assuming river ment commercially navigable (Calcasieu, Mississippi, Sabine River, intracostal), but I reviewed the wiki and see that I need to reduce my threshold for what a big channel would be. I’ll update it. Good tip on... commented 2025-12-07 16:09:44 UTC by Apathetic_Engineer ♦2 |
| 175235375 (Comments: 4) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Kan gebeuren. Kleine tip, voordat je aan zo'n ingrijpende wijziging begint, kijk even wat en wanneer de vorige wijzigingen waren, mocht dat onlangs zijn, dan zou het kunnen zijn dat je met oude data aan het werk bent en dat je je pannen moet... commented 2025-12-07 16:07:35 UTC by Geim ♦196 |
| 175558560 (Comments: 4) | Dannox (Discussed changesets: 33) | Uit de wiki.. The building and the way should have shared nodes at the entry and exit points of the building. commented 2025-12-07 16:07:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175614974 (Comments: 4) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 330) | Hallo zusammen, ich bin über https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Germany#10/51.8867/13.9217 aufmerksam geworden. Meiner Meinung nach sollten Kreisverkehre ausschließlich nur dann aufgesplittet werden, wenn es baulich erfor... commented 2025-12-07 16:04:20 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,107 |
| 162755414 (Comments: 2) | the-wouter (Discussed changesets: 18) | Sure, makes sense. Feel free to change the tagging 🙂 commented 2025-12-07 15:54:05 UTC by the-wouter ♦30 |
| 163345694 (Comments: 1) | Probertp (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ahoj, tu mi vyhadzuje po mierovom namesti,že tade ide žltá turistická trasa a zároveň je na tej istej ceste tag foot=use_sidepath, čo sa medzi sebou bije. Nevidím, kto prvý pridával ten tag, vidím ... commented 2025-12-07 15:45:49 UTC by moonraver ♦43 |
| 173412472 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonjour Pierre, lors du traitement de ce signalement, tu avais désactivé un tronçon nettement trop long du chemin piétons-vélos. Seule la partie en amont a été renaturée, alors que toute la p... commented 2025-12-07 15:44:29 UTC by MFlamm ♦66 |
| 175598123 (Comments: 3) | businessesMan (Discussed changesets: 17) | Danke für die Antwort. Das ist tatsächlich interessant. Ich hatte es noch gar nicht hinbekommen, die Linie 105 auf hvv.de zu finden, also auch danke für den Link. commented 2025-12-07 15:25:58 UTC by kadiwa ♦52 |
| 172443845 (Comments: 1) | i61hcakz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, le chemin est un contour extérieur appartenant à une relation landuse=farmland, il n'a pas besoin de porter cet attribut. Bien cordialement. commented 2025-12-07 15:25:34 UTC by zorglubu ♦346 |
| 175615566 (Comments: 1) | danill2001 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Прошу вас писать осознанные комментарии к правкам, а не просто набор букв commented 2025-12-07 15:23:20 UTC by literan ♦6,902 |
| 175605911 (Comments: 1) | Gemma Petite (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please don't remove the outlines of the building unless they have been demolished, just remove the tags that specify what the building is if that has changed. commented 2025-12-07 15:18:36 UTC by MassCartog ♦257 |
| 167528564 (Comments: 1) | Flayer (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hi! I was cycling in the area ans saw some inconsistencies. Is there a new bridge being built for pedestrians? Why did you mark a foot path? Is it separate path or just a sidewalk on the bridge? commented 2025-12-07 14:46:09 UTC by Dindia ♦27 |
| 175589168 (Comments: 1) | Nickinton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ya se encuentra mapeado el club aquí: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6888747 Por favor, no duplicar elementos en el mapa. Se elimina nodo duplicado y se actualizan datos en el área correspondiente. Saludos. commented 2025-12-07 14:44:34 UTC by mweper ♦437 |
| 155913718 (Comments: 6) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hallo Bergfrei, die Bank werde ich wohl verschoben haben, damit sie auf der gleichen Seite des Weges bleibt. Ich habe sie nach Augenmaß verschoben und nicht nachgemessen. Wenn sie zu weit abseits ist, dann rücke sie einfach wieder n&aum... commented 2025-12-07 14:43:01 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦26 |
| 175621321 (Comments: 3) | Helium314 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ok :) Werd es mir bei Gelegenheit anschauen. commented 2025-12-07 14:42:04 UTC by coatix ♦6 |
| 175563189 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i wizyty w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 14:41:15 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 175620902 (Comments: 2) | PouleNoire (Discussed changesets: 3) | Furthermore, this new building looks rather strange: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456669044 commented 2025-12-07 14:37:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175619972 (Comments: 1) | PouleNoire (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, as an outside observer these changes seem somewhat unusual to me. Existing OSM buildings are being deleted on a large scale and more or less the same buildings are being reimported. Has this been discussed or agreed with the loc... commented 2025-12-07 14:35:58 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175558596 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zlikwidowałem przejazd kolejowy, korzystałem z nagranego śladu. commented 2025-12-07 14:34:32 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 175586239 (Comments: 2) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 268) | I nie bardzo rozumiem na jakiej podstawie łączysz ekrany akustyczne na nasypie z drogą która przechodzi pod nim - to nie jest poprawne commented 2025-12-07 14:33:26 UTC by syntex ♦890 |
| 175614931 (Comments: 1) | jaskiniamc_pl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, dzięki za edycje. Pamiętaj proszę, że: 1. Korzystanie z map Google jako źródła nie jest dozwolone, a w description fryzjera na to się powołałeś/aś. 2. Nazwa obiektu powinna być tylko nazwą własną. Człony opisowe ... commented 2025-12-07 14:31:52 UTC by uprkos ♦76 |
| 174513033 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade. Hier ook. Het is inmiddels weer hersteld. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174513033 warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway \t8 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 14:30:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175523554 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i poprzedniej wizyty w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 14:30:12 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 175617464 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Youness, it doesn't exist because, as its tags say, it's "proposed". ADM already found the companies that will build it and construction will begin very soon. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoroute_continentale_Rabat_-_... commented 2025-12-07 14:29:56 UTC by ilias_ ♦385 |
| 175559978 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i poprzedniej wizyty w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 14:29:54 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 135677248 (Comments: 2) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 132) | Yes, Tag:shop=trade + trade=building_supplies is equivalent here. I've updated the tags. commented 2025-12-07 14:28:50 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦294 |
| 174384906 (Comments: 2) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Probeer eens te reageren op opmerkingen zodat je minder fouten gaat maken. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18421285 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 14:28:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175423283 (Comments: 6) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Jak byłem ostatnio to leżał tylko śnieg, ale faktycznie kiedy byłem miesiąc wcześniej to był tam wysypany żwir. Tag service będzie dobrym wyborem. Pozdrawiam. commented 2025-12-07 14:25:50 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 175103126 (Comments: 2) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Wat is emergency maxheight? Waar staat dat in de wiki? commented 2025-12-07 14:25:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175208892 (Comments: 2) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 80) | Bonjoue Marc, Je vais regarder ça. Charles de Carto’Cité commented 2025-12-07 14:24:27 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,172 |
| 175227599 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | \tPaaltje Leusdenhof is niet conform afspraken binnen OSM. Wellicht heb je hier iets aan hoe met namen omgegaan kan worden. Good practice https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice Probeer je er svp iets meer in te verdi... commented 2025-12-07 14:23:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175577023 (Comments: 3) | canofcatfood (Discussed changesets: 4) | This is some text from osm inspector (areas)… Old-style multipolygons Multipolygon relations with tags on the (outer) ways instead of on the relation. This is deprecated and should not be used any more. Move the tags from the outer ways... commented 2025-12-07 14:20:26 UTC by nevw ♦2,089 |
| 175448338 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Dag Remco, name Uitrit Kazerne Zebra is geen straat naam. Al die accesstags zijn default, maar ik denk dat het beter access=private is met emergency=yes MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 14:17:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174496109 (Comments: 3) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 8) | I have added a note about this area to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5082201 for someone who cares about the quality of the map to investigate. commented 2025-12-07 14:15:22 UTC by tomhukins ♦254 |
| 175602849 (Comments: 3) | Elefant aus Wuppertal (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🙂👍 commented 2025-12-07 14:09:35 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,453 |
 | 175424594 (Comments: 2) | Renel augustin (Discussed changesets: 3) | half of the city seems to be tagged now with house number 000 or "inconnu" commented 2025-12-07 14:06:20 UTC by westnordost ♦45 |
| 174212413 (Comments: 1) | Adrian Shobrooke (Discussed changesets: 13) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped: * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings int... commented 2025-12-07 13:54:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175624363 (Comments: 1) | maxim11112223 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycz... commented 2025-12-07 13:51:14 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175599486 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 286) | https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=175599486 - tutaj widać lepiej : ), a źródło to filmiki Awizonosza na YT. Generalnie budowa się skończyła więc już przy tej Armatniej lepiej reprezentuje teren po prostu landuse=railway. A re... commented 2025-12-07 13:49:19 UTC by syntex ♦890 |
| 175614872 (Comments: 1) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 330) | Das Sortieren von Busrouten zum Verdecken von unberechtigten Löschungen zu verwenden trage ich so nicht mit...ich erwarte die Wiederherstellung meiner destination-tags...andernfalls werde ich das hier als Vandalismus melden. Auch Busrouten nutze... commented 2025-12-07 13:34:30 UTC by bwbuz ♦58 |
| 175614777 (Comments: 1) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 330) | Wieso löscht du hier meinen destinatin-tag obwohl korrekt an den betroffenen Elementen des Kreisverkehrs eingetragen? Ich halte das für Vandalismus... commented 2025-12-07 13:29:52 UTC by bwbuz ♦58 |
| 127962974 (Comments: 2) | torger (Discussed changesets: 7) | As I said in the last of these values you commented, there was an import error for NVDB data at a period when lots of data was imported. The number is "correct", but has a tail of garbage decimals. I have rounded it to 4.8 now. If you see m... commented 2025-12-07 13:29:19 UTC by torger ♦13 |
| 175590225 (Comments: 4) | GUFSZ (Discussed changesets: 42) | Danke commented 2025-12-07 13:21:30 UTC by GUFSZ ♦168 |
| 174939128 (Comments: 4) | Anna-sw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Otrzymałem odpowiedź https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Zg%C5%82o%C5%9B_b%C5%82%C4%85d_w_artykule#c-DentArt-20251203140400-Grzegorz75jan-20251124095900 (trzeba wyszukać) i na wszelki wypadek cytuję "W tytule artykułu nie ma poda... commented 2025-12-07 12:52:54 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦577 |
| 174654355 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Deze wijziging is incorrect. Bij het begin van de oprit staat alleen het bord G1 (begin autosnelweg). Dan geldt de algemene snelheid voor autosnelwegen (130 km/h). Pas op de hoofdrijbaan staat het verkeersbord A1-100. Vanaf daar geldt 100 km/h. |
| 175228428 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hier ontbreekt de tag barrier=bollard bij de paaltjes. Daarnaast is de name-tag niet bedoeld voor beschrijvingen als 'Paaltjes Leksmondplein'. Ik heb het verbeterd. commented 2025-12-07 12:46:18 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,030 |
| 175596877 (Comments: 6) | m@rio (Discussed changesets: 131) | kolego, niestety ale słabo rozumiesz.. Podejrzewam, że nie widziałeś tej drogi na oczy - dlatego rekomenduję ci w pierwszej kolejności pojechać i zobaczyć, a następnie (jeśli dalej bedziesz miał wątpliwości) skontaktować się z jej Z... commented 2025-12-07 12:43:59 UTC by m@rio ♦70 |
| 175585975 (Comments: 4) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 113) | Danke für den Hinweis auf PTNA, das erklärt dann wohl auch das vorherige sehr inkonsistente Mapping und das bus=yes. Dir ebenso einen schönen Sonntag! commented 2025-12-07 12:39:37 UTC by mapper999 ♦382 |
| 175607262 (Comments: 6) | Ternerebelde (Discussed changesets: 3) | @Ternerebelde. En OSM mapeamos lo que está en terreno, si el sendero existe, se mapea. Incluso si nos ponemos todos de acuerdo en borrarlo por X motivo, alguien de cualquier parte del mundo puede agregarlo sin tener nosotros mucho espacio para... commented 2025-12-07 12:37:51 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175617710 (Comments: 1) | nuroso (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ist der Weg nicht mehr vorhanden, oder vorhanden und nicht begehbar? Vorhandenes mappen wir immer und dokumentieren den passenden Tags den Zustand. Ein aufgelassener Weg, den man aber noch sehen kann könnte z.B. ein abandoned:highway... commented 2025-12-07 12:34:40 UTC by tux67 ♦2,001 |
| 175570510 (Comments: 2) | Tamani Wolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | und nicht vergessen die Übergänge/Verbindungen zu Ampeln/Verkehrsinseln einzuzeichnen, sonst sorgen diese separaten Weg für große Umwege in der Fuß- und Radfahrernavigation. commented 2025-12-07 12:33:09 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,453 |
| 175617660 (Comments: 1) | nuroso (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo nuroso, abgerisse Gebäude löschen wir üblicherweise nicht, solange diese noch auf Luftbildern oder in den ALKIS Daten zu sehen sind, damit kein anderer Mapper sie anhand dessen erneut einträgt. Stattdessen verwenden wi... commented 2025-12-07 12:28:11 UTC by tux67 ♦2,001 |
| 175616079 (Comments: 1) | Sanba1983 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-12-07 12:23:50 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175618681 (Comments: 1) | Ljfsipke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-07 11:54:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175483591 (Comments: 3) | cartomatto (Discussed changesets: 34) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Relation:multipolygon Ciao, Andrea commented 2025-12-07 11:53:50 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,486 |
| 175610472 (Comments: 1) | w34ver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I made some tiny adjustments. It now does show on the BTCmap with a name. https://btcmap.org/merchant/node:11276621972 Greetings, Edwin commented 2025-12-07 11:44:15 UTC by Comino ♦270 |
| 175609039 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Жбанков (Discussed changesets: 1) | Расстановка кричащих надписей не поможет. Лучше расскажите как ездят в этом районе. По 04Н-900 объезжают? commented 2025-12-07 11:38:40 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 170345689 (Comments: 2) | stefbo_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Another issue. * Buildings should have their corners squared. Best regards commented 2025-12-07 11:34:53 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175612872 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 908) | Nothing wrong. Both have exactly the same meaning. Usage statistics are almost identical for both (5000 + a bit), access=employees is older and shorter. I edited this node mainly due to the note, which is unnecessary because it just repeats... commented 2025-12-07 11:33:52 UTC by mueschel ♦6,754 |
| 175602880 (Comments: 2) | paveueq (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dodawaj źródło zmian, jeśli dotyczą one rzeczy niepochodzących z dostępnej domyślnie ortofotomapy. Zwykła "wizja lokalna" lub "survey" wystarczy, jeśli zauważyłeś to naocznie w ostatnim czasie. Wiedz tylko, że ... commented 2025-12-07 11:32:12 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦321 |
| 173885454 (Comments: 2) | Babbe (Discussed changesets: 3) | Frey-Grynaeisches Institut commented 2025-12-07 11:23:47 UTC by Babbe ♦3 |
| 295594 (Comments: 3) | Ben (Discussed changesets: 4) | OK i have found the photos, but it's a photo from a long way back. It appears to be a bridge between 2 wooden fences that you climb over. I can't see more detail than that. commented 2025-12-07 11:23:31 UTC by Ben ♦3 |
| 175599053 (Comments: 2) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 31) | Спасибо, учту! Перепутал с детскими тренажерами на игровой площадке. :) commented 2025-12-07 11:22:08 UTC by Calibrator ♦12 |
| 175600789 (Comments: 1) | Артур Стрельцов (Discussed changesets: 1) | дубли поставили commented 2025-12-07 11:06:17 UTC by literan ♦6,902 |
| 175607465 (Comments: 2) | Ternerebelde (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG Revert under Ticket#2025120710000033 commented 2025-12-07 11:01:43 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,507 |
| 175616548 (Comments: 2) | Ternerebelde (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG Revert under Ticket#2025120710000033 commented 2025-12-07 11:01:32 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,507 |
| 173179881 (Comments: 3) | Stef-Cris (Discussed changesets: 4) | E usor sa spui tot felul de ineptii si sa nu ai dreptate commented 2025-12-07 10:59:51 UTC by Stef-Cris ♦1 |
| 150086264 (Comments: 1) | Michael712 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Lebe in Heinsberg stimmt so! commented 2025-12-07 10:55:58 UTC by nuroso ♦1 |
| 175610983 (Comments: 5) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hey, welcome to OSM. Just FYI, we can't use Google Maps as a source. That tends to get people pretty riled up around here. Let me know if you have questions, I'm a local editor. commented 2025-12-07 10:50:16 UTC by Omnific ♦212 |
| 175454921 (Comments: 2) | ManychShipCanal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ooops, ignore my previous comment. The map wasn't yet updated for me. commented 2025-12-07 10:27:02 UTC by foreigner037 ♦70 |
| 174667997 (Comments: 4) | cpof-tea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi again, As I can see I've finished experimenting, but the last variand doesn't look like proper approach in my opinion https://prnt.sc/JYAe8_33GyRF Also there are kept number of broken restrictions supposedly left after prev... commented 2025-12-07 10:25:10 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦216 |
| 174418624 (Comments: 3) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 60) | A mon avis c'est un ancien étang qui a été asséché/canalisé afin d'alimenter les aménagements de center parcs et/ou protéger l'autoroute d'inondations. On voit un ru au milie... commented 2025-12-07 10:15:52 UTC by MathGon ♦3 |
| 175615414 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 123) | Działka pomiędzy dworcami jest prywatna, pod biurowiec. W wątku na SSC gdzieś przewinęła się nazwa firmy. commented 2025-12-07 10:04:19 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦321 |
| 175483942 (Comments: 1) | STV87 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hej Simon, Det er ikke for at pege fingre eller noget omkring din sletning af området. Data på OSM er sikkert kommet fra SDFE 25 kortet. Derfor tror jeg, at du også skal en tur forbi Klimastyrelsen, som har tegnet omr&... commented 2025-12-07 10:00:31 UTC by b-holdet ♦337 |
| 175615068 (Comments: 1) | Dokgurte (Discussed changesets: 2) | Added information on knowledge of local conditions commented 2025-12-07 09:40:39 UTC by Dokgurte ♦2 |
| 175614297 (Comments: 1) | forcella (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao forcella, ho visto che hai richiesto che qualcuno controllasse le modifiche. Innanzitutto grazie per le tue modifiche, ogni contributo è prezioso. Io avrei solo mappato il cartello dove è realmente presente (a sinis... commented 2025-12-07 09:39:10 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,800 |
| 175598323 (Comments: 3) | Cat2006 (Discussed changesets: 13) | OK, so it's a vacant shop now. I reverted the deletion and added a disused: prefix. In this way, the history of the node is preserved, if it opens again it's easily restored, and editors like StreetComplete will highlight it every now and t... commented 2025-12-07 09:21:41 UTC by rhhs ♦168 |
| 175547818 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted since maxheight was applied to too long segment and unnecessary split was made #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175614340 commented 2025-12-07 09:16:31 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
 | 175358540 (Comments: 1) | LFOD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Walked by the area today, park is now open and in use too the public. commented 2025-12-07 09:11:53 UTC by LFOD ♦2 |
| 172478718 (Comments: 3) | kam_te12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for sharing the details related to your visit. It was helpful. commented 2025-12-07 09:00:38 UTC by kam_te12 ♦1 |
| 171728646 (Comments: 4) | Pink Duck (Discussed changesets: 43) | Agreed, done. commented 2025-12-07 08:58:01 UTC by Pink Duck ♦164 |
| 173998198 (Comments: 3) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 133) | Polish definition of trunk roads has changed recently. Please check Polish version of Wiki page for more information https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk commented 2025-12-07 08:57:57 UTC by Yunkers ♦405 |
| 175613418 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Extra part of the descripton: Been here many times, it's a road commented 2025-12-07 08:55:59 UTC by JasiahMaps1010 ♦4 |
| 151763983 (Comments: 1) | Rom1 (Discussed changesets: 64) | Hello, Est ce que ce chemin est vraiment un sentier équestre ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144736217/history Jean-Baptiste commented 2025-12-07 08:42:27 UTC by jbcharron ♦149 |
| 175583962 (Comments: 3) | schabanel (Discussed changesets: 19) | Merci :) commented 2025-12-07 08:39:55 UTC by Syl ♦1,012 |
| 175387362 (Comments: 2) | 홍은기 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175393117 commented 2025-12-07 08:35:38 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175576454 (Comments: 4) | Akira4755 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok understood. Thank you so much for sharing the tool. I'll keep this in mind. commented 2025-12-07 08:34:56 UTC by Akira4755 ♦1 |
| 175555255 (Comments: 1) | devamsx (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175613193 where the comment is: "Remove testdata" commented 2025-12-07 08:32:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 175555230 (Comments: 1) | devamsx (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175613179 where the comment is: "Remove testdata" commented 2025-12-07 08:32:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 175611110 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, welcome to OSM. This changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. Best regards, Pascal commented 2025-12-07 08:32:05 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175583481 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 908) | Thank you for your response. I understand the reasoning. Regarding the discrepancy with the Wiki, I'll consult with the Japanese community about it. commented 2025-12-07 08:29:35 UTC by kudomenagi ♦4 |
| 175611903 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, welcome to OSM. This changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. Best regards, Pascal commented 2025-12-07 08:29:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| X | 175612771 (Comments: 2) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Already mapped, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900 commented 2025-12-07 08:28:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175603260 (Comments: 1) | Julianna123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175612942 where the comment is: "Remove vandalism" commented 2025-12-07 08:24:33 UTC by NeisRevert ♦372 |
| 175591365 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted since restriction was not set in the full extent of York road east end and unnecessary split was made #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175612773 commented 2025-12-07 08:15:23 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 175041252 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM15 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Здравсвуйте. Поняла ошибку,исправлюсь commented 2025-12-07 08:11:45 UTC by Ozon OSM15 ♦4 |
| 175589201 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 3) | Removing accidental node creation #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175612533 commented 2025-12-07 08:04:01 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 6557732 (Comments: 3) | MHolz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, thanks. I changed so. commented 2025-12-07 07:57:31 UTC by Tomas_J ♦314 |
| 175593637 (Comments: 2) | Wiki-Wiki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je bijdrage heb ik verwijderd. De club staat hier al getagd op de adresnode. clubhuistag toegevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 07:53:39 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175582698 (Comments: 1) | Sara1000 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, wieso wurde der Name auf "1" geändert? Grüße commented 2025-12-07 07:48:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 175589493 (Comments: 2) | NeisReview (Discussed changesets: 6) | Vielen Dank für den Kommentar. Ich habe keine Ahnung, was dieser mit dem Changeset hier zu tun hat. Viele Grüße, Pascal commented 2025-12-07 07:43:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,715 |
| 167626839 (Comments: 1) | mirada81 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, für diesen Punkt habe ich in Karten keinen Namen gefunden. Bitte beachten https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Gruß L commented 2025-12-07 07:38:09 UTC by Lokai ♦485 |
| 175605771 (Comments: 1) | TobyTot (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) That looks fine, thanks for updating it. commented 2025-12-07 07:33:29 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,687 |
| 175580298 (Comments: 1) | e10_10_10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Sildiğiniz yollar uydu görüntülerinde görünüyor. Neden sildiniz? commented 2025-12-07 07:06:57 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦180 |
| 175604156 (Comments: 2) | Jrrs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zou het voorlopig zo laten en kijken wat de navigatie er mee doet. De updates van je routingapp kunnen even duren. Geen idee hoe lang. commented 2025-12-07 06:58:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
 | 175441744 (Comments: 2) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 110) | Olá Daniel Agos, Obrigado pela correção. O primeiro foi um lapso; o segundo, um erro. Alterações já realizadas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175611007#map=19/38.785485/-9.18... commented 2025-12-07 06:54:10 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦108 |
| 150000453 (Comments: 1) | Landry GAIFFE (Discussed changesets: 18) | De ma lecture du wiki, je comprends que la clé species doit contenir le nom binomial de l'espèce, et pas uniquement la seconde partie de celui-ci. Est-ce une erreur de ma part ? commented 2025-12-07 06:49:00 UTC by Lejun ♦503 |
| 175582185 (Comments: 1) | Irish_Conor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456389491/ In general, if a highway=* only leads to farmland, forestry, a bog or quarry, and has NO utility for the general public, it gets mapped highway=track. If it leads to an individual farm o... commented 2025-12-07 06:48:28 UTC by VictorIE ♦974 |
| 175601167 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, From the website:- https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/bellevue-south-park/facilities/dogareas, it looks like leashed dogs are allowed in the park but not in play areas. Imagery suggests the playground area is still a playground. commented 2025-12-07 06:47:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175587384 (Comments: 1) | Macun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. OpenStreetMap'e katkı sağlarken önemli olan, eklenen verilerin rendererlarda güzel görünmesi değildir. Verinin doğruluğu önemlidir. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#... commented 2025-12-07 06:44:14 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦180 |
| 175468654 (Comments: 5) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 67) | Jeszcze stoją, ale są w trakcie rozbiórki tj. połowa budynku jest rozebrana do szkieletu commented 2025-12-07 06:34:40 UTC by Feskil ♦28 |
| 174972076 (Comments: 1) | Akiba220 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, unless the bench is known as "Bench" you don't need to tag "name=Bench" The name key is used for the name of the feature as it is called, for example a bench could be called John Memorial's Bench. ht... commented 2025-12-07 05:54:10 UTC by akadouri ♦60 |
| 171562716 (Comments: 1) | Dzertanoj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please avoid using multipolygons unless they are really necessary. They make features harder to edit and in this case they provide no benefit. commented 2025-12-07 05:37:16 UTC by tguen ♦88 |
| 175554264 (Comments: 6) | TMil31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's more like the validator doesn't really highlight that error very well. commented 2025-12-07 05:23:11 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 46981940 (Comments: 2) | karl jayson ferrer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Found you other viewpoints. seems to be related to a run? Saw a Finishline. Since many others have been deleted, I'll just delete these viewpoints. Cheers, Totor commented 2025-12-07 04:51:39 UTC by Totor ♦71 |
| 175606245 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Color values in OSM should in lower case. In general in OSM other than proper names and a few other exceptions, all tag values should be lower case. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2025-12-07 04:40:44 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175600040 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. While your edit is not wrong, generally if a feature has a wikidata= tag then wikipedia= tag is unnecessary since it can be extracted from wikidata. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.or... commented 2025-12-07 04:34:42 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 80761377 (Comments: 1) | IvanUK18 (Discussed changesets: 6) | residential_entrance is not a supported tag. You may use entrance=* and assign ref oder addr-tags to the entrances. Thank you. commented 2025-12-07 04:32:09 UTC by opendcc ♦1,553 |
| 175597018 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. In this edit you moved a library node a few buildings over. Was that intentional? Also it looks like you tagged what appears to be an apartment building as a single-family house. Could you please elaborate on this change? ... commented 2025-12-07 04:30:30 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175596128 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | If you think that somebody needs to be fixed about a feature that you can't, rather than using note= tag, it's better to use fixme= tag. If you'd like you can try using https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to generate opening_hours t... commented 2025-12-07 04:28:12 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 22122165 (Comments: 1) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 171) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164627765/history has shop = builders_merchant that was added in this edit shop=builders_merchant ? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag... commented 2025-12-07 04:22:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175592369 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Also while you cleaned up biz tags from the building itself, you left opening_hours= tag on it, which obviously is not necessary for an apartment building. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2025-12-07 04:19:34 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175514011 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. When adding facebbok info it's sufficient to use just 1 tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175514011 commented 2025-12-07 04:12:54 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175513391 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. You can tag this as a vacant business or use lifecycle prefix until the new biz opens. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175513391 commented 2025-12-07 04:11:47 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 143644830 (Comments: 3) | TrailRunnerBW (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks! commented 2025-12-07 04:11:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 174708804 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Changeset reverted to restore this POI. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175608699 commented 2025-12-07 04:05:17 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175608651 (Comments: 1) | Totor (Discussed changesets: 4) | I believe it does not make sense to add fixme=name to every highway by default, since the need for a neam is implied.... It is useful however to add the tag to a few streets where the name is missing in an otherwise completely named area... commented 2025-12-07 04:04:28 UTC by Totor ♦71 |
| 175132721 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Rather than delivery=partner, it's more correct to use delivery=yes and delivery:partner=* as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery:partner --- Published using OSMC... commented 2025-12-07 04:00:01 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 174708996 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Rather than using shop=vacant, it's better to use "disused:" lifecycle prefix as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix While your change is not outright wrong, there are some that consider sho... commented 2025-12-07 03:54:52 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 173925905 (Comments: 2) | Ansofter (Discussed changesets: 4) | Falsch angelegte Sackgassen wurden in Changeset 175608359 wieder entfernt commented 2025-12-07 03:42:37 UTC by Ansofter ♦5 |
| 175568804 (Comments: 1) | masonthemapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome! try to briefly describe what you are updating in the change-set comment something like "added address tags" commented 2025-12-07 03:09:36 UTC by Fen <3 ♦9 |
| 171606124 (Comments: 1) | ToprakM (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257935589/history has building = hutq that was added in this edit building=hutq ? Maybe intention was to use building=hut and then square area? commented 2025-12-07 03:05:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 169796002 (Comments: 1) | Maradona11 (Discussed changesets: 57) | I can't find any signage or markings on the ground indicating https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470076706 is for bicycles, I would need to survey again though in case there is a sign at one of the entrances commented 2025-12-07 03:02:28 UTC by aharvey ♦1,900 |
| 175535292 (Comments: 4) | Skylark_H_C (Discussed changesets: 5) | As `=yard` has become a conventional practice nationwide, just let it be. I'll take your options for the other two points. 既然“yard”已成为全国性的惯例，就让它这样吧。 我会采纳你关于另外两点... commented 2025-12-07 02:59:21 UTC by Skylark_H_C ♦17 |
| 175607816 (Comments: 1) | pootriarch (Discussed changesets: 33) | it's not clear to me whether we remove the street entirely, but i opted for just access:no for now. there are no street markings, just bollards. i didn't take note of whether the two blocks on the larkin side exist commented 2025-12-07 02:48:28 UTC by pootriarch ♦26 |
| 175607545 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo17172 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Corrijo, es la página 282 commented 2025-12-07 02:30:22 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦4 |
| 143916639 (Comments: 1) | smarties (Discussed changesets: 92) | Hallo, ich habe diese Löschung des unterirdischen Burgmühlengrabens <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574433046> im Bereich des Pumpwerks Inselwall rückgängig gemacht. Der Graben wird tatsächlich unterirdisch gedoppelt... commented 2025-12-07 02:16:47 UTC by rohieb ♦131 |
| 175593056 (Comments: 2) | Amfnziw (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19123 commented 2025-12-07 02:12:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175582980 (Comments: 2) | lucas1960 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lucas1960 commented 2025-12-07 02:07:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175499154 (Comments: 1) | MSCymz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello MSCymz, could you please explain the intention of this changeset? There is no tram in Hamburg. commented 2025-12-07 01:29:06 UTC by kadiwa ♦52 |
 | 174131470 (Comments: 1) | Bobolo Hilliary (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Bobolo Hilliary! Welcome to OpenStreetMap :) I just want to give you a few words of advice - You don't need to name the buildings with what they are, because this can be shown through the other tags. - You can show if buil... commented 2025-12-07 00:53:43 UTC by ceirios ♦73 |
| 155530230 (Comments: 5) | Erelen (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hopefully fixed in 175606339. Let's wait for the next OMaps release. commented 2025-12-07 00:50:34 UTC by Erelen ♦82 |
| 175592386 (Comments: 1) | Amfnziw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175605765 commented 2025-12-07 00:06:06 UTC by KennyDap ♦52 |
| 175592951 (Comments: 1) | Amfnziw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175605756 commented 2025-12-07 00:05:43 UTC by KennyDap ♦52 |
| 59365356 (Comments: 1) | Doug777 (Discussed changesets: 8) | This node is seriously in the wrong place. Was the restaurant really on the corner of Washington and Washington Court in May of 2018? I have moved it to the actual location based on on-the-ground survey. commented 2025-12-06 23:57:04 UTC by gdt ♦51 |
| 174997736 (Comments: 3) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 11) | When someone comments on any of your changesets, you should almost always respond, even if that answer might be "I don't know" - or if you fixed the mistakes yourself, as it helps prevent further issues on OSM and builds trust with oth... commented 2025-12-06 23:45:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦69 |
| 175573595 (Comments: 3) | InfosecSnipe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the quick reply.. Yes, I saw that you are relatively new to OSM. I don't want to discourage you from continuing with OSM if you enjoy it. You are by no means the only one who has used the horse_riding tag for other things, example: ht... commented 2025-12-06 23:34:51 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦854 |
| 175604361 (Comments: 1) | zbh0170 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Erratum : à lire Griottier et non Grottier commented 2025-12-06 23:23:19 UTC by zbh0170 ♦3 |
| 175603280 (Comments: 1) | zbh0170 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Erratum : à lire Griottier et non Grottier commented 2025-12-06 23:20:11 UTC by zbh0170 ♦3 |
| 119350356 (Comments: 1) | Skunkman56 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi, i think there are some leftover untagged lanes that are not in relations from this change but I'm not sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175604607 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175604426 commented 2025-12-06 23:13:02 UTC by tuttiton ♦28 |
| 175522966 (Comments: 4) | Jrrs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi.. Eigenlijk zou je een berichtje kunnen sturen naar die app bouwer. Zou die naar motorcycle kijken? Die zou zich aan het routeringsprincipe van osm 'moeten' confirmeren. Maar goed... kwaad kan het niet.. want bij c12 hoort mope... commented 2025-12-06 23:09:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175350199 (Comments: 7) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 107) | Nie no, jest dobrze - DK61 tam jest, bo w drugą stronę musi być DK61 (nie ma bezpośredniej łącznicy) commented 2025-12-06 23:07:51 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦827 |
| 175600747 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 156) | *[..., Mapbox] (not sure what imagery it is) commented 2025-12-06 23:02:31 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦704 |
| 175600645 (Comments: 1) | Pruszków88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19121 commented 2025-12-06 23:01:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 131639216 (Comments: 1) | David_RF (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7336754817 quelle source te fait penser que la borne tri-standard n'a plus de combo css ? Cordialement, Marc commented 2025-12-06 22:57:17 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,336 |
| 166754802 (Comments: 2) | DurgeshSinghChouhan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, thank you very much, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12863526578/history is edited and added tags as you suggested. I will upgrade tags in nearby fruit stalls as well, thank you for pointing out my mistake commented 2025-12-06 22:52:26 UTC by DurgeshSinghChouhan ♦17 |
| 174832383 (Comments: 2) | LySioS (Discussed changesets: 24) | Merci de ta vigilance commented 2025-12-06 22:50:44 UTC by LySioS ♦136 |
| 175376401 (Comments: 8) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Pruszków88 to konto trolla Temat-Droga, na forum został już zablokowany za obchodzenie blokady. commented 2025-12-06 22:34:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175595861 (Comments: 3) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, das ist ein bisschen tricky. Ist es ein unterirdischer Tank mit offenem Schacht, d. h. die Entnahme geschieht mit Saugkorb, wäre es nur emergency=water_tank. Ist der Anschluss fest verrohrt, wäre das emergency=fire_hydrant m... commented 2025-12-06 22:16:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 162189702 (Comments: 2) | K_D_R (Discussed changesets: 1) | I mean this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049366884/history/18 commented 2025-12-06 22:15:04 UTC by tuttiton ♦28 |
| 175601541 (Comments: 1) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, danke dir, das sieht gut aus. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-06 22:12:26 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175337424 (Comments: 1) | Dx10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175602975 commented 2025-12-06 22:01:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175337667 (Comments: 1) | Dx10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175602975 commented 2025-12-06 22:01:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175353384 (Comments: 2) | Dx10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19120 commented 2025-12-06 21:50:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175602106 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 36) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-12-06 21:41:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175601418 (Comments: 1) | normchell (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее и та... commented 2025-12-06 21:36:23 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175210072 (Comments: 1) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 12) | 🤩 commented 2025-12-06 21:35:49 UTC by stillhart ♦171 |
| 175461313 (Comments: 1) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 12) | 🤩🤩🤩 Beautiful, perfectly mapped and so fast. Thanks! commented 2025-12-06 21:35:18 UTC by stillhart ♦171 |
| 157581010 (Comments: 2) | Bastianowitz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point man könnte gar die einzelnen Säulen mappen. commented 2025-12-06 21:34:33 UTC by stillhart ♦171 |
| 175597905 (Comments: 1) | Thomasschönwalde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Thomas, Ah... Feuerwehr... Immer gut! Das ist deine erste Bearbeitung... Darum hierzu speziell auch Tips und Links... Schau dir mal folgendes an: http://www.openfiremap.de/?zoom=12&lat=51.93861&lon=13.95241&lay... commented 2025-12-06 21:21:30 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,107 |
| 175581415 (Comments: 2) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, das mit dem Ref hab ich mir bei den andern Orten angeschaut und die klare Beschriftung. Danke für die Info mit den Anschlüssen. Gruß commented 2025-12-06 21:19:37 UTC by MB_UA ♦3 |
| 175565255 (Comments: 2) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, Danke für den Hinweis. Das eine ist nur eine Saugstelle, als HInweis, dass hier der Zugang zum Bach gut gewährleistet ist. Habe hoffentlich beides korrigert. Gruß commented 2025-12-06 21:15:58 UTC by MB_UA ♦3 |
| 175355800 (Comments: 1) | Superstore Media (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just having a quick look at this, edit looks grat. commented 2025-12-06 21:07:05 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175501278 (Comments: 1) | thopf (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi, I noticed that the segment of Fichtestraße 71–75 was changed to pedestrian-only. Emergency vehicles are allowed on this road, and contractors are allowed in special circumstances. The surface is paved and wide enough for a car. |
| 175593750 (Comments: 1) | njmccarthy11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi @njmccarthy11 . Welcome to OSM! You asked for review - the road looks good to me. It's hard to see through the trees on aerial imagery and you anticipated well where it runs. Good job. I see you are adding this as part of a HOT... commented 2025-12-06 20:59:12 UTC by aki007 ♦12 |
| 170169434 (Comments: 3) | Kosti_Lajos (Discussed changesets: 1) | A Lomexes épület esetében az eredeti címkézés annyiban volt jobb, hogy maga az épület megmaradt (és így aki mondjuk lejárt szavatosságú légifelvételr... commented 2025-12-06 20:56:13 UTC by ha5vsa ♦7 |
| 175400807 (Comments: 3) | Landkreis Prignitz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei, ich noch mal... ich hab mir das mit euren Daten nochmal in Ruhe angeschaut... https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/4605c26759e84658844c53ec7ef6d6d9?draft=true#widget_6=active_datasource_id:dataSource_2,center:1356494.19119167%2C7010237.65737... commented 2025-12-06 20:55:11 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,107 |
| 175520375 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted because of unnecessary splits and restrictions set on part of the way not covered by a traffic sign #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175600849 commented 2025-12-06 20:52:05 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 175519147 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverting west side of Sherwood Forest Road edit since split was done at the wrong crossroad #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175600107 commented 2025-12-06 20:26:26 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 174934917 (Comments: 2) | BenBoss69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, du hast barrier=city_wall auf dem landuse=residential hinzugefügt, das kann nicht stimmen. Ich hab es wieder entfernt. commented 2025-12-06 20:20:25 UTC by CaptainCrunch ♦26 |
| 175517628 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverting since split was not done at the crossroad #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175599679 commented 2025-12-06 20:10:33 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 175434034 (Comments: 8) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 24) | 1. It's not "a" project, but many 2. The project, individual projects would include the improvements only, not the pre-existing and unchanged sections 3. OSM doesn't track construction project management either. That belon... commented 2025-12-06 20:00:41 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,680 |
| 175349404 (Comments: 3) | Fazu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ilyen helyekre megfordulás tiltást rakni felesleges, útvonaltervezőknek az út típusából illene kitalálni, hogy egypályás úton meg lehet-e fordulni. Illetve mivel el... commented 2025-12-06 20:00:34 UTC by infeeeee ♦619 |
| 175598187 (Comments: 1) | tansu_bla (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I saw you requested a review for this changeset. The edit looks good. But since you have traced on aerial imagery, I imagine that you aware that you did not draw the real outline of the building but only a probable outline, whic... commented 2025-12-06 19:49:27 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 175591121 (Comments: 1) | tansu_bla (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/349277440/history "La boite aux lettres rouge de bpost n'existe plus, donc j'ai réutilisé le POI pour un arbre" That looks smarts but… it is not recommen... commented 2025-12-06 19:47:59 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 175405116 (Comments: 2) | benguuuuu (Discussed changesets: 3) | I was using it to close out the line. Still new at this - relax. commented 2025-12-06 19:47:02 UTC by benguuuuu ♦3 |
| 175571583 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:46:09 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571547 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:46:03 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571523 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:58 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571502 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:53 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571481 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:46 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571471 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:39 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571452 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:32 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571443 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:24 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571424 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:19 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571409 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:15 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571365 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:09 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571334 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:44:49 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571213 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:44:38 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175571086 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:44:32 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175568502 (Comments: 1) | klasterosm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598882 commented 2025-12-06 19:38:06 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175568500 (Comments: 1) | klasterosm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598861 commented 2025-12-06 19:37:34 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175568498 (Comments: 1) | klasterosm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598840 commented 2025-12-06 19:36:41 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175558785 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 125) | Защото беше малко глупаво и очакваше всяка локация да има от всички цветове. Вече е коригирано. commented 2025-12-06 19:34:45 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦754 |
| 174297077 (Comments: 1) | Steve_NC60 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Steve, Thanks for contributing to golf course mapping. We need all the help we can get. However, there are some problems with how you're mapping and I want to make sure you correct those behaviors so they don't continue int... commented 2025-12-06 19:21:12 UTC by b-jazz ♦776 |
| 175598074 (Comments: 1) | map_improver_xyz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello, my changes (work of more than an hour) from just before got lost. I assume they are in the previous version. How can I reverse this here? commented 2025-12-06 19:20:50 UTC by map_improver_xyz ♦5 |
| 160019797 (Comments: 3) | wambacher (Discussed changesets: 115) | fixed. btw: no idea why that happend commented 2025-12-06 19:17:36 UTC by wambacher ♦437 |
| 175591484 (Comments: 1) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 39) | thx for that as well commented 2025-12-06 19:17:28 UTC by Yog Sot ♦373 |
| 175591485 (Comments: 1) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 39) | thx for that commented 2025-12-06 19:17:08 UTC by Yog Sot ♦373 |
| 175596391 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 36) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911467867 https://www.open... commented 2025-12-06 19:12:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175415246 (Comments: 1) | stevethomp (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Steve, Thanks for contributing to golf course mapping. We need all the help we can get. However, there are some problems with how you're mapping and I want to make sure you correct those behaviors so they don't continue int... commented 2025-12-06 19:04:52 UTC by b-jazz ♦776 |
| 152039297 (Comments: 2) | fuggy (Discussed changesets: 2) | И здесь тоже: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288064720 commented 2025-12-06 19:03:16 UTC by mike140 ♦357 |
| 175549273 (Comments: 1) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, hier passt etwas noch nicht ganz. Statt emergency=saugstelle_günz müsste es emergency=suction_point sein. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-06 18:59:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175540633 (Comments: 1) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkung zum Feld „ref“: Dies dient ausschließlich der Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ggf. ausgewiesen ist. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag u... commented 2025-12-06 18:56:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175064989 (Comments: 1) | zamekzamek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Panie usunąłeś Pan junction = roundabout z ronda commented 2025-12-06 18:49:44 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 169678882 (Comments: 4) | SteMue (Discussed changesets: 13) | (fmc_1 bin ich auch, entschuldige bitte das Posten mit dem anderen account) commented 2025-12-06 18:47:12 UTC by fmc_1 ♦10 |
| 175153193 (Comments: 1) | zamekzamek (Discussed changesets: 8) | jak dodajesz relację to proszę zwracaj uwagę na tagi na rondach, bo usuwasz junction=roundabout commented 2025-12-06 18:33:49 UTC by puchaczowsky ♦153 |
| 175570570 (Comments: 2) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Salut. Ce era în Centrul Vechi se numea tagging for the renderer. O singură clădire din realitate era cartografiată din mai multe ways cu tag-ul „building”. În multe cazuri nici nu exista un "building" care... commented 2025-12-06 18:24:30 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦4 |
| 164690846 (Comments: 2) | Maps Man (Discussed changesets: 49) | Or... mention https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Oberaffe to help? It seems that most of the powerlines were created by him, and he is an expert in this field. commented 2025-12-06 18:19:12 UTC by Skylark_H_C ♦17 |
| 146323161 (Comments: 2) | Muad_Dib (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello. Thank you. It was a mistake. commented 2025-12-06 18:04:47 UTC by Muad_Dib ♦3 |
| 175595227 (Comments: 1) | bbqman (Discussed changesets: 40) | also source: https://boringdonhall.co.uk/ and Wikipedia/Wikidata commented 2025-12-06 17:44:05 UTC by bbqman ♦34 |
| 175447464 (Comments: 3) | outgoing-owl-homer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, good! I was going to suggest moving it physically too, but you figured that out already. Good job :) commented 2025-12-06 17:36:12 UTC by Sakari_N ♦99 |
| 156721845 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | Hello, I found also shop=tractor. I think this tag is better. commented 2025-12-06 17:35:48 UTC by mapperue ♦232 |
| 146263214 (Comments: 1) | CjMalone (Discussed changesets: 111) | I'm not sure about the name change here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/54.518700/-1.502995 from "Morton Park Beefeater" to "Morton Park" The latter is the branch name used on the website, but... commented 2025-12-06 17:28:44 UTC by phodgkin ♦73 |
| 175590017 (Comments: 2) | TheNet1996 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, yes, many thanks for this great tool! The main reason for my single CS is to avoid a CS across the entire city of Berlin - i prefer local ones. I'm also dbl check the mapped phone numbers in OSM with the phone numbers from the Websi... commented 2025-12-06 17:19:01 UTC by TheNet1996 ♦177 |
| 174209597 (Comments: 3) | SteMue (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ganz sicher nicht wegen fehlender lit=no, Aber lassen wirs gut sein. commented 2025-12-06 17:15:33 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,453 |
| 175593571 (Comments: 2) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ah, okay. Dann reverte ich die Ergänzungen. commented 2025-12-06 17:14:31 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦46 |
| 148665003 (Comments: 1) | TWHB (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi, could you give some references about this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262727168) power plant? I have searched on Internet and official documents and I cannot find any information. Regards commented 2025-12-06 17:14:20 UTC by kapazao ♦954 |
| 175447159 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 292) | Hi, how do you know the other user copied data from GMaps of the edit was only to delete a duplicate POI? commented 2025-12-06 17:10:16 UTC by Mannivu ♦249 |
| 175590754 (Comments: 1) | XExplor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-06 17:02:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174453723 (Comments: 1) | dcbm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei, ...nur zur Info: da gibt es auch eine Note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4864943 Wenn du es einschätzt, kannst du die ja schließen... Sven commented 2025-12-06 16:59:10 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,107 |
| 175553363 (Comments: 1) | Rdeipenau (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola Rdeipenau, le envié mensaje por privado y ahora por acá, usted hizo una eliminación masiva de calles y que otros usuarios tuvieron que revertir sus cambios, le vuelvo a decir lo mismo que en el mensaje anterior, antes de bor... commented 2025-12-06 16:42:33 UTC by serock ♦77 |
| 172425512 (Comments: 1) | avsdyvwaoebmeahos (Discussed changesets: 5) | 안녕하세요, 편집하신 내용을 보고 몇몇 중요한 내용을 말씀드리고자 합니다. 1. 공사 중인 시설/단지는 '공사 중인 지역'을 사용해 나타내야 합니다. 아무리 이름에 공사중이... commented 2025-12-06 16:34:22 UTC by aaei924 ♦32 |
| 171401516 (Comments: 1) | lukasz klosek35 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj! Byłem zmuszony wycofać zmiany "ułatwiające dojazd przy użyciu aplikacji e-Remiza", gdyż, wbrew pozorom, wcale nie ułatwiały tego zadania. Przede wszystkim, nastawnia już była oznaczona jako nastawnia, a jej oznaczenie ja... commented 2025-12-06 16:04:30 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦49 |
| 137008331 (Comments: 1) | bernardifeanyi1 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please provide a source that says that Kőris-hegy is a volcano. Its material is Jurassic limestone. commented 2025-12-06 16:02:33 UTC by nemethtamas ♦16 |
| 175003692 (Comments: 1) | cbbcbail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for updating W Wash to reflect the recent changes. I noticed that you tagged the split sections as `highway=tertiary_link`. I changed it back to tertiary. Link is only when the road connections to a lower classified road. commented 2025-12-06 15:46:43 UTC by hobbesvsboyle ♦17 |
| 174836443 (Comments: 3) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Wie früher schon gesagt: für Kartendienste mit monatlicher Aktualisierung wie zB OSMAND ist dieses Mikromanagement kontraproduktiv. commented 2025-12-06 15:35:16 UTC by Daham ♦10 |
| 175589769 (Comments: 2) | hvtleven (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #175590793 commented 2025-12-06 15:34:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175588966 (Comments: 2) | hvtleven (Discussed changesets: 2) | De gebouwen heb ik weer hersteld conform de BAG. Wanneer iets niet klopt dan svp aab het Kadaster doorgeven. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-06 15:27:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175587852 (Comments: 1) | nygrid1811plan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please could you explain what malicious edit has been done here? commented 2025-12-06 15:22:32 UTC by BrackoNe ♦111 |
| 175587382 (Comments: 1) | nygrid1811plan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please could you explain what malicious edit has been done here? commented 2025-12-06 15:22:10 UTC by BrackoNe ♦111 |
| 175587283 (Comments: 1) | nygrid1811plan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please could you explain what malicious edit has been done here? commented 2025-12-06 15:21:36 UTC by BrackoNe ♦111 |
| 175378899 (Comments: 4) | Dardug (Discussed changesets: 2) | Te invito al canal de Telegram de OSM Argentina, donde se puede hablar de estas cosas https://telegram.me/osm_ar Tenemos hasta un canal para Chaco y Corrientes. commented 2025-12-06 15:13:35 UTC by pertile ♦68 |
| 175358445 (Comments: 1) | Erin0209 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Your mappings are not in line with the quality standards of HOTOSM. Inaccurately mapped. Not squared and nodes connected to other buildings. Please improve your mapping skills Best regards commented 2025-12-06 15:09:30 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 174867793 (Comments: 1) | Holly Mat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Here you mapped a few objects, where both the inside and outside show a shadow. These are no buildings (no roof) Also, here you did not map the straw covered buildings. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 14:51:55 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175565237 (Comments: 3) | Wonderful Alligator (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi.. I really don't know. Google is not allowed as source. The website fom the shop is allowed. But there is no website I believe? Anyway.. the shop is there. You may remove the address? It's not existing. Greetz.. egg... commented 2025-12-06 14:49:20 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174868268 (Comments: 1) | Holly Mat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello . Thanks for the mappings. Your mappings are rather accurate. However, you overlooked the straw covered buildings, round and rectangular. Map them also the next time. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 14:49:11 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175360968 (Comments: 1) | Arnotsu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Accurately mapped. Please map the round huts as well next time. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 14:45:06 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 91845635 (Comments: 1) | Jordan Mann (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks a lot Jordan. I know this was 5 years ago, but I hope now consider using separate nodes instead of adding the shops' information to the whole building. As you can see from Mapillary they don't actually take up the whole building, the... commented 2025-12-06 14:37:02 UTC by ilias_ ♦385 |
| 175397221 (Comments: 4) | OliverMi1 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Meiner Meinung nach ja wegen des Aufbaus des Bahnhofs. Da befindet sich das Baufeld, wo Baustoffe liegen und auch Maschinen stehen. Da der erstere Weg sowieso gesperrt ist, ist ja sowieso kein Durchkommen. Jedenfalls ist der gesamte Abschnitt, auc... commented 2025-12-06 14:36:13 UTC by OliverMi1 ♦5 |
| 149925260 (Comments: 3) | Diabolo68 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-06 14:35:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 161603094 (Comments: 7) | javl (Discussed changesets: 5) | ..amenty=bicycle_parking.. en dan kun je de buildingtag laten staan. commented 2025-12-06 14:33:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 174884639 (Comments: 1) | Zoe Stanfill (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Sorry to say, but your mappings don't meet the quality standards of HOTOSM Inaccurately mapped. Buildings not squared. Clustered buildings . Connected nodes to other features. Please improve your map... commented 2025-12-06 14:27:16 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 149134732 (Comments: 3) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 264) | Alles klar Absolut nachvollziehbar Ich hab die HsNr jetzt nach ALKIS erfasst und bei den unstimmigen ein fixme hinterlassen. Findest du das in Ordnung? commented 2025-12-06 14:24:39 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,727 |
| 175587785 (Comments: 1) | kenken234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | There are slight differences between URA's subzones within planning area and HDB's neighbourhoods within towns. I;ve included elaboration in the description of the relevant relations commented 2025-12-06 14:21:17 UTC by kenken234 ♦36 |
| 175560592 (Comments: 1) | MustafaOyunda155 (Discussed changesets: 4) | building=proposed etiketi kullanılmaması gerekiyor. Önceki düzenlemedeki problem neydi? commented 2025-12-06 14:10:48 UTC by keyyushi ♦20 |
| 175581565 (Comments: 1) | MustafaOyunda155 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ankara Metro Proposed & Construction ilişkisini neden sildiniz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17586582 commented 2025-12-06 14:08:01 UTC by keyyushi ♦20 |
| 175584124 (Comments: 4) | javl (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oke.. pas je het zelf aan. Ik heb de BGT omtrekgericht gebruikt. Toen was die parking kleiner. Dan zal nu de rest ook voor de auto s zijn opgeofferd. Tja.. al die bossen. In Den Haag heeft iemand van elke straat een bos gemaakt. Die ko... commented 2025-12-06 14:03:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175587274 (Comments: 1) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ich habe den Born Trail überarbeitet. Er erfüllt nicht die Anforderungen an eine Route. (Kein Operator, nicht markiert). Er ist aber weitherum bekannt. Ich habe mein Möglichstes getan, damit es sauber aussieht und damit ein Benutzer au... commented 2025-12-06 14:03:17 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦27 |
| 174556963 (Comments: 1) | Yayadiro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Haritada bulunan eczaneyi kaldırıp üstüne kendi dükkanınızı koymuşsunuz. Değişikliği geri aldım. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175587376 commented 2025-12-06 14:00:32 UTC by keyyushi ♦20 |
| 175494155 (Comments: 2) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 2) | Accidental node relocation made, node change reverted #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175587293 commented 2025-12-06 13:57:08 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 174805401 (Comments: 5) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und sorry das ich erst zu spät bei dir melde und sorry, das ist diese Frage antworte, obwohl ich es nicht verstehe!! Ich bin darauf ausgegangen, daß bei der Frage das Brot ... commented 2025-12-06 13:49:24 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 171951153 (Comments: 4) | Jybernard (Discussed changesets: 1) | la création de données 2D peut receler des pièges (la preuve), la 2,5D (ce que l'on peut faire dans OSM) est encore plus touchy ! Si vous souhaitez un échange de visu (je suis sur Belleville), contactez-moi via la mes... commented 2025-12-06 13:49:13 UTC by Britzz ♦244 |
| 175280668 (Comments: 2) | zinderMT (Discussed changesets: 3) | Töröltem a hibás értéket, köszönöm! commented 2025-12-06 13:45:36 UTC by zinderMT ♦2 |
| 175569261 (Comments: 1) | Bustte (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Varias correcciones. Las puertas de entrada no van en los cruces. No están en los cruces. Los nombres de las calles son los nombres oficiales, no descripciones de dónde están. Lo mismo con los parques. Si no ti... commented 2025-12-06 13:35:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175586461 (Comments: 1) | liums (Discussed changesets: 1) | Un terrain de trial a été installé sur une partie de la zone par l'association de monocyclistes Mono'Gre et la mairie (cf https://asso-monogre.blogspot.com/2025/06/mise-en-place-zone-trial.html) . Je ne suis pas certain... commented 2025-12-06 13:35:31 UTC by liums ♦1 |
| 175567615 (Comments: 1) | Bustte (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Cuál es el motivo de eliminar una localidad entera? Son importaciones que hicimos del INE. La vamos a reponer, pero por favor dar mayores explicaciones en en changesets. gracias --- ... commented 2025-12-06 13:29:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 172425199 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 62) | Ihan vaan fyi (for your information) commented 2025-12-06 13:26:28 UTC by rle32795 ♦27 |
| 175586139 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 156) | Bronnen, alleen voor referentie. - Archieven.nl / Zeeuws Archief (1905-1915) https://proxy.archieven.nl/0/7376451EBE044A619CE6C0493FECA4EA - Flickr (2009) https://www.flickr.com/photos/32178000@N03/3914859761/in/pool-grijpskerke/ - RCE... commented 2025-12-06 13:25:05 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦704 |
| 175073621 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, ode... commented 2025-12-06 13:22:31 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175073616 (Comments: 3) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, ode... commented 2025-12-06 13:17:01 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175073594 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Danke, das du diese Änderung Rückgängig gemacht hast. Ja, die Frage habe ich leider nicht richt... commented 2025-12-06 13:15:05 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 174868305 (Comments: 1) | John Ashton Davies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not map a building over a highway. Sat Nav systems cannot cope with that. The road ends there. Just move the road a bit aside. And, do not cluster multiple buildings as 1 building. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 13:13:04 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175237100 (Comments: 1) | Celine_the_Person (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not add names with a message to a building. Local mappers will add extra's when required like shop, café, church etc. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 13:11:59 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 175584844 (Comments: 1) | rubenpeters91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-06 13:10:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175054453 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, ode... commented 2025-12-06 13:07:51 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
 | 172139505 (Comments: 2) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 99) | With pleasure. commented 2025-12-06 13:05:15 UTC by BigKev97 ♦85 |
| 172307053 (Comments: 2) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 99) | Translation is very tricky. commented 2025-12-06 13:04:42 UTC by BigKev97 ♦85 |
| 175054443 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, ode... commented 2025-12-06 13:03:49 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175583754 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 7) | Pearle is already on the map, you are adding duplicate data. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3267487254 I’ll revert this. commented 2025-12-06 13:00:28 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 172957841 (Comments: 1) | CODATA-BO (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, qu'est-ce qu'on construit ? commented 2025-12-06 12:57:09 UTC by frosm ♦1,153 |
| 175054441 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und sorry das ich zu spät zurückmelde und das ich hier den Insel eingetragen habe!! Wie kann ich diesen Fehler wieder Rückgängig machen, oder könntest du es b... commented 2025-12-06 12:52:25 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175054442 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Sorry, das ich erst zu spät zurückmelde!! Auch sorry, das wusste ich auch hier leider nicht, das hier kein taktiles Pflaster gibt!! Und wie kann ich auch hier wieder Rückgängig machen oder k&o... commented 2025-12-06 12:46:22 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175054421 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht, und Sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe!! Ich wusste leider nicht, das da leider keine taktiles Pflaster hat. Und wie kann ich das wieder Rückgängig mac... commented 2025-12-06 12:33:12 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 162246700 (Comments: 6) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hi again, Apologies if the links were not working, I'll explain with some images here - https://ibb.co/8LwhFMX7 This one here routes via Alwin road, while valid - you can simply stick to Powke Lane for a more direct route, it appears the ... commented 2025-12-06 12:25:38 UTC by FoldForever ♦1 |
| 175500501 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 7) | Whole Hutton Street should have been restricted, there is a sign from the north at Granville Drive. Reverting because of unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175583406 commented 2025-12-06 12:18:52 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦63 |
| 175054415 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo Mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht, und sorry, das die Radwege komplett unterschlagen habe!! Und wie kann ich das wieder Rückgängig machen, oder kannst das auch bitte Rückgängig machen?? Dank... commented 2025-12-06 12:17:22 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175577924 (Comments: 1) | 0xc4 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for this. If the new bakery replaces the former one on the same spot, the best way to map this is to change the tags on the existing object instead of creating a new one. Tagging a shop as disused is good practice only when a sho... commented 2025-12-06 12:14:38 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,672 |
| 175054414 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo Mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Antwort und sorry, das ich erst zu spät zurückmelde!! Oh das wusste ich nicht. Wie kann ich das wieder Rückgang machen, oder kannst du das bitte für mich erledigen, bitte??<... commented 2025-12-06 12:05:24 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 171909651 (Comments: 1) | Rowon1025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13142341064/history has shop = 印章 that was added in this edit shop=印章 ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openst... commented 2025-12-06 11:55:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 62563486 (Comments: 2) | kryniczan (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185185262/history commented 2025-12-06 11:54:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 75196244 (Comments: 2) | LafarM (Discussed changesets: 50) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105079658/history commented 2025-12-06 11:54:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 75183466 (Comments: 2) | LafarM (Discussed changesets: 50) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281935383/history commented 2025-12-06 11:54:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 28926547 (Comments: 1) | sorbovit (Discussed changesets: 31) | source:maxgcweight = PL:sign_B-18? B-18 to chyba jest znak dotyczący masy rzeczywistej? nie maksymalnej masy dopuszczalnej? Więc tu chyba zwyczajne maxweight (i source:maxweight) powinno być? commented 2025-12-06 11:52:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175358847 (Comments: 1) | GrosBgDeToulouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping Please do not map a plot with multiple buildings on it as 1 building. Map them individually. And solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 11:49:06 UTC by Frans S ♦10,162 |
| 174081722 (Comments: 1) | Lmldemax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap, merci pour vos premières contributions. Je me suis permis de corriger certains chemins qui se superposait à d'autres et a détacher des chemins qui était... commented 2025-12-06 11:40:47 UTC by jbcharron ♦149 |
| 175579819 (Comments: 2) | Tomas Straupis (Discussed changesets: 84) | Labai nepageidautina, bet aš taip iš karto nepuolų jų trinti (aš čia tik tą sidewalk žymą ir pridėjau, kad mes profesionalius žemėlapius kurdami galėtume be vargo išmesti tokius nereikalingus duomenis). Bet su la... commented 2025-12-06 11:40:35 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,005 |
| 170815593 (Comments: 10) | StephaneP (Discussed changesets: 38) | Encore que.... avec 3 motos, ça doit être possible, à la condition qu'une d'entre elles utilise du chademo... :-D commented 2025-12-06 11:38:50 UTC by StephaneP ♦480 |
| 175459208 (Comments: 1) | Leptitmouton (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Merci pour tes contributions dans les Vosges Il y a quelques années des contributions ont ajoutés des noms de chemins "Voie de {commmune} à {une autre commune}", ces noms sont issues du cadastre mais ne cor... commented 2025-12-06 11:22:25 UTC by jbcharron ♦149 |
| 175579906 (Comments: 2) | Rijden met marcel (Discussed changesets: 1) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-06 11:01:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 160691318 (Comments: 1) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 68) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12456840038/history has source:maxgcweight = PL:sign_B-18 that was added in this edit B-18 to chyba jest znak dotyczący masy rzeczywistej? nie maksymalnej masy dopuszczalnej? Więc tu chyba zwyczaj... commented 2025-12-06 10:58:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175579900 (Comments: 1) | Roshan-Negi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for your edit! When mapping buildings, you can make them rectangular by hitting Q on your keyboard when having it selected. Also please note that name = House is not the right way to tag this, because the building is not actu... commented 2025-12-06 10:55:57 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦43 |
| 156933680 (Comments: 1) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 99) | Hi BigKev97, where did this mass addition of street names came from? Looks non-free and copyrighted source. Can you please clarify. commented 2025-12-06 10:54:00 UTC by Enock4seth ♦588 |
| 171165955 (Comments: 2) | cOSMografix (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bonjour Ludovic C'est pas dirt du tout :) Erreur de doigt sur Streetcomplete. Bien vu. C'est corrigé. commented 2025-12-06 10:44:16 UTC by cOSMografix ♦24 |
| 145070487 (Comments: 3) | hofoen (Discussed changesets: 70) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-06 10:39:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 173801998 (Comments: 1) | btcitnet (Discussed changesets: 14) | da dove l'hai preso l'indirizzo? commented 2025-12-06 10:30:22 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦145 |
| 174369351 (Comments: 5) | alok1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Może warto wpisać te adresy URL do: source:name ? Jak kilka, to oddzielić średnikami? Wtedy byłoby mniej wątpliwości chyba. commented 2025-12-06 10:22:30 UTC by Las Wolski ♦11 |
| 175481018 (Comments: 1) | fmc_5 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hey, zur Erinnerung: Diese Aufsplittungen an Kreuzungen sind eigentlich unnötig, da sich ja aus der Kreuzung selbst ergibt, dass man dort nicht parken kann. lg, Alex commented 2025-12-06 10:21:44 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦432 |
| 175576831 (Comments: 4) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Landuse construction aangepast naar greenfield .. name aangepast naar description. Nog geen bouwactiviteiten hier. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-06 10:17:34 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 164955047 (Comments: 1) | StC (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi StC, your recent changesets have left behind a lot of broken relations: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.61514&lat=48.38004&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node... commented 2025-12-06 10:15:01 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 164884845 (Comments: 1) | StC (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi StC, your recent changesets have left behind a lot of broken relations: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.61514&lat=48.38004&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node... commented 2025-12-06 10:14:51 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 175552199 (Comments: 1) | wolfbert (Discussed changesets: 16) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5079699 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175552199 commented 2025-12-06 10:14:37 UTC by Luzandro ♦958 |
| 173788067 (Comments: 1) | Bogomil Shopov - Бого (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10819338166/history - how table tennis how dirt surface? commented 2025-12-06 10:11:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 511938 (Comments: 1) | Javier Sanchez (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25605150/history has surface_material = dirt that was added in this edit why not use regular surface= tag? commented 2025-12-06 10:10:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175573108 (Comments: 2) | deferred2841 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah I didn't realise. Sorry, I'll make sure to read the wiki. commented 2025-12-06 10:10:28 UTC by deferred2841 ♦1 |
| 144918050 (Comments: 1) | Max Ogden (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402438943/history - surface=5 ? was it supposed to be lanes=5 ? commented 2025-12-06 10:07:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175462458 (Comments: 1) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Lola Fox, your recent changesets have left behind several broken landuse relations, so the content cannot be rendered properly on maps: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.92238&lat=44.36362&zoom=15&baselay... commented 2025-12-06 10:04:01 UTC by gscholz ♦2,824 |
| 164730189 (Comments: 1) | OTNoblat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour @OTNoblat Il y a un sousis dans le num de téléphone que vous avez indiqué pour Bob Le Fromager. Il manque des chiffres. Pouvez-vous faire la correction ? Merci d'avance commented 2025-12-06 10:01:14 UTC by Patchanka ♦414 |
| 10440232 (Comments: 1) | SergeDorval (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93641063/history has surface_material = dirt that was added in this edit why not use regular surface= tag? commented 2025-12-06 10:00:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 155654721 (Comments: 1) | 9854458923 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310594058/history has shop = マックスバリュウ that was added in this edit shop=マックスバリュウ ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is... commented 2025-12-06 09:55:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 168517374 (Comments: 1) | Kurdy (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12979658710/history has shop = drugstore that was added in this edit Would it be pharmacy tagged as amenity=pharmacy ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy ) Something else? commented 2025-12-06 09:48:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 125820753 (Comments: 3) | JTS51 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Ahh Het fietspad heet officieel Voetpad, maar die stukjes bij de kazerne hebben kennelijk geen naam. Groet, eggie commented 2025-12-06 09:44:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175563374 (Comments: 1) | Fippe (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi :) wäre das nicht eigentlich etwas für die OHM (openhistoricalmap)? Gruß aus dem Waldecker Land --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175563374 ... commented 2025-12-06 09:42:40 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,727 |
| 175575806 (Comments: 2) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bedankt voor de tip commented 2025-12-06 09:34:56 UTC by Meesvansteenbergen ♦5 |
| 126420563 (Comments: 3) | JeanMappe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-06 09:33:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 166990430 (Comments: 3) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 21) | > ref by itself is mysterious, so why not name it better? no idea who had this idea, maybe it makes more sense fot UK native speakers? Either way, it has got established and widely used. BTW, there are sillier ones, see https://wiki.open... commented 2025-12-06 09:33:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175576400 (Comments: 1) | kihyung (Discussed changesets: 1) | There's already 광화문 in this place. There's no need to repeat it a second time. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175577356 commented 2025-12-06 09:31:34 UTC by KennyDap ♦52 |
| 135631458 (Comments: 3) | rainerU (Discussed changesets: 44) | the last sentence was completely mistaken, ironically I created that page on wiki sorry (I had prepared comment that I copy pasted and it was outdated - sorry for a confusion!) commented 2025-12-06 09:29:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175576482 (Comments: 2) | AIAB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Duidelijk, bedankt! commented 2025-12-06 09:29:34 UTC by AIAB ♦3 |
| 175569009 (Comments: 1) | w34ver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-12-06 09:23:26 UTC by Comino ♦270 |
| 175550536 (Comments: 1) | xBitsNL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Fout is het niet echt, maar beter berdrijven, brandweer e.d. op de adresnode bijtaggen. Dus niet de gebouwomtrek gebruiken... commented 2025-12-06 09:01:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175498477 (Comments: 1) | BlueAlpha8 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, You made lots of duplicated highway sections on the car parking service roads. I thin I've corrected/removed them all. Please try not to map any sections twice. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-06 08:39:35 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175530759 (Comments: 1) | Heismuron (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcoem to OSM! Please use lowercase characters for the keys and values: highway=path instead of Highway=Path! commented 2025-12-06 08:29:44 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,461 |
| 134383341 (Comments: 2) | redrace (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi Feel free to so this. CU Meik commented 2025-12-06 08:28:59 UTC by redrace ♦165 |
| 175552222 (Comments: 2) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ik zal het meenemen commented 2025-12-06 08:24:31 UTC by Meesvansteenbergen ♦5 |
| 175551269 (Comments: 2) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dank u wel commented 2025-12-06 08:23:31 UTC by Meesvansteenbergen ♦5 |
| 175542440 (Comments: 1) | Akira4755 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, You made lots of duplicate sections of footpaths here. I think I've corrected/removed all of them. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-06 08:23:23 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,021 |
| 175551575 (Comments: 2) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dank voor uw tip! commented 2025-12-06 08:23:17 UTC by Meesvansteenbergen ♦5 |
 | 158591156 (Comments: 2) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 169) | Hello This store sells tractors and agricultural combines. I don't think the shop=agrarian attribute is appropriate for this store. Its value is between shop=agrarian and shop=cars. You can specify a more appropriate value if you're s... commented 2025-12-06 08:19:15 UTC by solenoid jam ♦189 |
| 167706450 (Comments: 3) | PropertyVIEW® (Discussed changesets: 31) | Instead of stuffing city into the name= tag, you are more than welcome to use "branch=*" tag to distinguish individual locations of a chain/franchise/whatever. --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-12-06 07:58:33 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175557979 (Comments: 1) | Fhacker (Discussed changesets: 1) | please make sure golf course areas don't overlap in the future. fairways shouldn't intersect tees or greens for example. commented 2025-12-06 07:48:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦776 |
| 159561463 (Comments: 4) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hallo, alles klar, sehe das der Weg dem GWR zu entnehmen ist. Gruss wies1 commented 2025-12-06 07:32:41 UTC by wies1 ♦172 |
| 175164056 (Comments: 7) | Vmosnokia31 (Discussed changesets: 2) | vậy tôi thấy cứ để vậy một thời gian xem họ còn thay đổi không commented 2025-12-06 07:04:49 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦27 |
| 175475455 (Comments: 1) | Paytonhenry04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Payton, I've reverted this changeset as there are dozen of problem edits that would take more effort to fix than to apply correctly. There were a ton of golf objects that were sloppily overlapping other objects (fairways and tee... commented 2025-12-06 07:03:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦776 |
| 175436008 (Comments: 2) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello MxxCon, Thanks for reaching out. Yes, I’ll look into getting my set-up updated to a more recent JOSM version. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-12-06 06:42:59 UTC by rajdhani ♦7 |
| 166116896 (Comments: 1) | NdwMan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo MdwMan, du hats hier einen Namen "Trafostation" eingetragen. FDad ist wohl eher eine Beschreibung. Genau so bei den vielen "Kanzeln". Einige wrden schon berichtigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13328376236. Bitte be... commented 2025-12-06 06:09:58 UTC by uvi ♦136 |
| 174126804 (Comments: 4) | JhowieNitnek (Discussed changesets: 186) | dan dient state=proposed toegevoegd te worden. Zie info in de wiki over het mappen van fietssnelwegen ... commented 2025-12-06 05:56:50 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦256 |
| 175572500 (Comments: 1) | 8051 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 1625 of your last 1770 changes were deletions. This is qui... commented 2025-12-06 05:46:11 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,520 |
| 138105296 (Comments: 2) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello Mateusz Konieczny, Thanks for reaching out with the question. After checking the history, I noticed that this edit was made about two years ago when I was still a new mapper. At that time, I was also working on the Hasiru Aqua Small P... commented 2025-12-06 05:01:17 UTC by 007Transformer ♦15 |
 | 175323596 (Comments: 1) | k99991 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19118 commented 2025-12-06 04:18:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175496812 (Comments: 1) | Jonas Nelhiebel Naturpark Hirschwald (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo! Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456019850 ist nun Teil von zwei Wanderwegrelatioinen, allerdings mit access=no getagged. Das macht keinen Sinn, daher bitte ich um Korrektur. commented 2025-12-06 04:15:58 UTC by ratrun ♦260 |
| 171931503 (Comments: 1) | niartenyaw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this seems like a mistake? The diet:vegan/vegetarian=only tags are for places that *only* serve vegan/vegetarian food, respectively. In other words, diet:vegan=only is for a place that does not serve any animal products at all, and diet:vegetaria... commented 2025-12-06 02:29:36 UTC by Legimet ♦1 |
| 175564690 (Comments: 1) | midget sub (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi, I reverted this changeset because there is no longer a path there. The imagery isn't up to date but there is a new computer science building that just opened this fall that connects to the right side of the old computer science building, so ... commented 2025-12-06 02:13:01 UTC by jm428 ♦23 |
| 174625543 (Comments: 2) | OLIVEVER (Discussed changesets: 1) | Также не сокращайте названия улиц. Принято писать их полностью commented 2025-12-06 02:06:28 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,210 |
| 175101014 (Comments: 1) | Hoang@159 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19117 commented 2025-12-06 01:48:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,245 |
| 175561564 (Comments: 3) | Beinardus (Discussed changesets: 5) | Aah. Yeah, row buildings can be hard to tell apart sometime. A good context clue in the US and western Canada (especially railroad boom towns like this one built ~1880-1930) is that the tightest density tends to be near the railroad tracks, and st... commented 2025-12-06 01:48:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 5100894 (Comments: 3) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 97) | Also 15 years ago...wow, that would have been one of my earliest Oklahoma edits... commented 2025-12-06 01:35:32 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 175569514 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 3) | also changed a ford into a bridge as that was obvious from imagery commented 2025-12-06 01:03:48 UTC by synthfi ♦8 |
| 174757286 (Comments: 1) | sjorford (Discussed changesets: 14) | Would planned:place=town suffice for the time being, seeing as its development plans envisions it as one? commented 2025-12-06 00:36:59 UTC by Aethonatic ♦17 |
| 175544234 (Comments: 1) | Guntram_Navis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456239137 ist wohl eher ein Reitplatz als eine Reitanlage im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding. Reitplatze werden normalerweise mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian get... commented 2025-12-06 00:14:25 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦854 |
| 162714534 (Comments: 1) | Hidoo00 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12601657140/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 163445706 (Comments: 1) | MigaDo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/294888995/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with chan... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 164957961 (Comments: 1) | woderkant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12753128543/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 159928952 (Comments: 1) | mapuit (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12396508913/history has bicycle:repair = assisted_self_service that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would y... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 165959230 (Comments: 1) | acidyellow (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12818107221/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 133529642 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 232) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4708870499/history has bicycle:repair = mobile that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 165121589 (Comments: 1) | Danfost (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766468551/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 159345459 (Comments: 1) | arevamp (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8032622099/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with cha... commented 2025-12-05 23:57:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 132590577 (Comments: 1) | cherbe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10665000594/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:57:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 164834965 (Comments: 2) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 26) | This really interesting (if you can excuse my enthusiasm). It seems that that UPRN was at the end of the road, but has then been moved. I added it manually when it was at the junction between "Huntington Road" and "Brandsby Grove"... commented 2025-12-05 23:56:48 UTC by philipcullen ♦15 |
| 175541076 (Comments: 1) | czak123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-05 23:52:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175555670 (Comments: 1) | MrPommes (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. "Bąkowiec": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way... commented 2025-12-05 23:52:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 175547422 (Comments: 1) | Kuba Teichman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-12-05 23:52:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,966 |
| 173867375 (Comments: 4) | S-zation (Discussed changesets: 33) | Nice - thank you for your additions to the map! commented 2025-12-05 23:35:04 UTC by S-zation ♦118 |
| 175567841 (Comments: 1) | Tamani Wolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Die Ausbesserung der Linien-Relationen für die CeBus wird in den nächsten Monaten folgen. commented 2025-12-05 23:10:18 UTC by Tamani Wolf ♦1 |
| 175538712 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 570) | Thanks for your reply, admitting to, and quickly fixing your error! I want to thank you as well for the work you do in increasing the data quality. commented 2025-12-05 22:53:55 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦627 |
| 157479345 (Comments: 2) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 112) | It was a best guess. commented 2025-12-05 22:18:55 UTC by Hb- ♦309 |
| 175566475 (Comments: 2) | Thunderhead380 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also now OSM has it correctly marked, private access will be more clear, and routing engines will not route people that way any longer if they are using OSM data. But it is NOT correctly mapped on Google Maps, they have it as a road. People a... commented 2025-12-05 22:18:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦257 |
| 173221923 (Comments: 3) | eireidium (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks for fixing - I couldn't reverse my mistake. commented 2025-12-05 22:08:38 UTC by eireidium ♦33 |
| 175563290 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 280) | Cześć, ruch jest dwukierunkowy na północnej jezdni. commented 2025-12-05 21:57:29 UTC by stasiu512 ♦208 |
| 175558975 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:55:07 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175560522 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:41 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175560924 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:34 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175561186 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:29 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175561363 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:23 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175561911 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:18 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175562698 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:10 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 164581973 (Comments: 1) | Johanson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por contribuir a la base de datos de OSM, pero creo que olvidaste agregar etiquetas a las carreteras que dibujaste. commented 2025-12-05 21:50:03 UTC by Sandal man ♦399 |
| 175556630 (Comments: 1) | magdak222 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nazwę Żabka piszemy normalnie, nie wielkimi literami commented 2025-12-05 21:44:07 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175565791 (Comments: 1) | Shahram Sh Kamal (Discussed changesets: 1) | yes good commented 2025-12-05 21:43:33 UTC by Shahram Sh Kamal ♦1 |
| 175526751 (Comments: 1) | EBurgDeflocker (Discussed changesets: 1) | It doesn't seem likely that the Flock device is in the middle of the intersection. Can you move it to a more exact position? Look for pole shadows to help determine what it is physically. --- Publish... commented 2025-12-05 21:37:34 UTC by Glassman ♦5,651 |
| 175553041 (Comments: 1) | zosikk (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:36:57 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175552993 (Comments: 1) | zosikk (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:36:52 UTC by bartgron ♦444 |
| 175031282 (Comments: 1) | SoyJosueVerde (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello SoyJosueVerde, I noticed some highways were reclassified from tertiary and secondary to primary. These roads have maintained a long history of being secondary or tertiary, and do not appear to fit the definition of primary (https://wiki.... commented 2025-12-05 21:34:42 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦74 |
| 170409255 (Comments: 3) | Rainero (Discussed changesets: 101) | Hallo Mateusz, app_operated=* ist auf jeden Fall dokumentiert auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parcel%20locker?uselang=de Daher habe ich das Attribut verwendet. translated with DeepL: app_operated=* is de... commented 2025-12-05 21:28:34 UTC by Rainero ♦598 |
| 152319918 (Comments: 1) | Cyril5C (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/705459010/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with chan... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 133060280 (Comments: 1) | ti-lo (Discussed changesets: 869) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5150402677/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with cha... commented 2025-12-05 21:12:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 174039460 (Comments: 1) | mbeyerle (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10205355086/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:12:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 155042509 (Comments: 3) | rosch0815 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks! commented 2025-12-05 21:12:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 175538686 (Comments: 5) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 570) | it seems so, but if I find myself completely mistaken I prefer to map something else after reverting myself. commented 2025-12-05 20:56:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,925 |
| 170867660 (Comments: 6) | Florian-Géopile (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai trouvé un plan de l’aménagement des quais donc je modifie la map mais est-ce qu'il y a un élément "place piétonne", "parvis", ... enfin un élément qui nomme ce ... commented 2025-12-05 20:54:02 UTC by Florian-Géopile ♦1 |
| 175563010 (Comments: 3) | chr_meier1997 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung. Das klingt erfreulich harmlos. Ja, die Hürden sind ziemlich hoch, das aber auch nicht ohne Grund. Die Hauptprobleme, die immer wieder auftreten: - Rechte an den Daten - Aktualitä... commented 2025-12-05 20:47:53 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175557143 (Comments: 1) | KRLONXOOO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Octopus parece existir. Los otros elementos qué son? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175557143 commented 2025-12-05 20:40:27 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175557045 (Comments: 1) | KRLONXOOO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. Solo oficiales. La plaza no se llama Coihueco? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175557045 commented 2025-12-05 20:33:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,641 |
| 175559738 (Comments: 1) | JD2202 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Das Tagging passt nur für einen Unterflurhydranten: Für die linke Saugstelle hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=987079235893621&focus=photo&x=0.1852114658967926&am... commented 2025-12-05 20:27:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,181 |
| 175544907 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 20) | You should know that OpneStreetMap is actually not a map but a database of map data that can be used by different map makers to make maps. The standard map on the OSM website is called Carto, and doesn't display sports clubs and health workers. ... commented 2025-12-05 20:09:13 UTC by rhhs ♦168 |
| 175558797 (Comments: 1) | Clauda Lucena (Discussed changesets: 2) | I flagged some footprints here which most likely do not represent buildings. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558797 commented 2025-12-05 19:56:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
 | 175487837 (Comments: 1) | Ratigra (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed area=yes because that is not needed on landuse (all landuse is ALWAYS an area!). But what do you mean with surface_colour=yellow on a cemetery? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface:colour commented 2025-12-05 19:50:37 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,828 |
| 175545027 (Comments: 1) | Kaizokupim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag pim De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode conform afspraken binnen OSM Nederland. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-05 19:50:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175559391 (Comments: 1) | wiktoria111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zmiana zostanie za chwile w całości wycofana. Proszę przekazać opiekunom by przestali kolejnym dzieciom zlecać edycję mapy OSM do własnych celów. OSM nie służy do tego typu zajęć. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSM... commented 2025-12-05 19:46:29 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦577 |
| 175545384 (Comments: 1) | Kaizokupim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Pim.. Probeer svp geen adresnodes te verwijderen. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-05 19:46:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175544782 (Comments: 1) | Kaizokupim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-05 19:41:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,810 |
| 175561964 (Comments: 1) | acubens71 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ai réutilisé les tags de la version 7 du bâtiment. commented 2025-12-05 19:38:19 UTC by acubens71 ♦40 |
| 175536897 (Comments: 2) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Tak, byłem na miejscu i widziałem numer oraz rozmawiałem z właścicielem (pracuję jako kurier). commented 2025-12-05 19:34:58 UTC by rafalw8 ♦1 |
| 175558987 (Comments: 1) | Clauda Lucena (Discussed changesets: 2) | The two northern footpritns represent buildings, the southern one does not; unlike the others it casts no shadow. Thank you for your contribution! Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery inte... commented 2025-12-05 19:23:01 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175551238 (Comments: 1) | Robin Niebuhr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, most buildings you added here represent buildings but the one I flagged outlines a yard. Note how the scene is lit and use that to aid your interpretation. Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! Each footprint should r... commented 2025-12-05 19:10:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,128 |
| 175560682 (Comments: 1) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Halte diesen Commit nicht zielführend commented 2025-12-05 19:09:11 UTC by SimonHarms ♦9 |
| 175551758 (Comments: 1) | RaZoX (Discussed changesets: 8) | Kolejna "aktualizacja" z "własnym" źródłem. Stosuj ciut bardziej szczegółowy opis aktualizacji i źródła, bo każdy ma swoje źródła ;) commented 2025-12-05 19:08:26 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦321 |
| X | 175560498 (Comments: 2) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 283) | Yes, I can! It was simply a mistake at my side leaving another cs open in JOSM! commented 2025-12-05 19:08:23 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,828 |
| 175236480 (Comments: 1) | brainwad (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, I just reverted a maleficient edit concerning busline 38 of a user before you. Since your changeset also edits this line, please check that your edits aren't affected. Thanks! commented 2025-12-05 19:01:33 UTC by Makeena ♦46 |
| 175360154 (Comments: 8) | Camoscio Sibillini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Puoi usare il tag DISUSED ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused ), o eventualmente ABANDONED ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned ), seguendo la sintassi descritta nelle pagine della wiki. Comunque scrivimi pure privatament... commented 2025-12-05 18:58:45 UTC by dp7 ♦58 |
| 175558349 (Comments: 1) | osmcrsdrv (Discussed changesets: 4) | This appears to be centered in a driveway. What's the camera mounted on? I might be able to better locate it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558349 commented 2025-12-05 18:55:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,277 |
| 168867078 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Don't blindly delete important parts of relations without respecting notes and instructions about the current local situation if you don't have any local knowledge! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175560464 commented 2025-12-05 18:52:06 UTC by Makeena ♦46 |
| 168832228 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 79) | Don't blindly delete important parts of relations without respecting notes and instructions about the current local situation if you don't have any local knowledge! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175560209 commented 2025-12-05 18:43:37 UTC by Makeena ♦46 |
| 175351472 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 36) | Малко е рано за тротоари. Още не са излезли новите снимки и после ще трябва да се наместват. Отделно предстои изграждането и на кръгово кр... commented 2025-12-05 18:38:29 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦754 |
| 175456663 (Comments: 1) | LeoKutno (Discussed changesets: 10) | Jak już poprawiasz te `landuse=farmland` to warto jednak dodawać te `landuse=residential`/`landuse=farmyard` w miejscu tych budynków, bo takie przesuwanie by zostawić pustą plamę raczej jest średnio sensowne. No i zachęcam przy okazj... commented 2025-12-05 18:31:10 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,188 |
| 175435121 (Comments: 2) | SKald (Discussed changesets: 22) | pas de quoi :) commented 2025-12-05 18:25:36 UTC by SKald ♦38 |