| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 185895660 (Comments: 1) | SrijaAdhya (Discussed changesets: 1) | Too many overnoded building with incorrect geometry, positions or angles, is useless even misleading --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185895660 ... commented 2026-07-17 17:38:09 UTC by IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C ♦8 |
| 185918143 (Comments: 1) | Sreejabhaduri (Discussed changesets: 3) | To comtribute OSM, On the ground is the key principle, you need to map the building outlines according on the reality, which may expressed as reliable imagery such as Bing or Esri, your mapping of outlines, positions and angles of buildings need to m... commented 2026-07-17 17:30:33 UTC by IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C ♦8 |
| 185886299 (Comments: 1) | Go-Cool (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset breaks 5 borders and makes them unusable without offering new borders. The changeset should be reverted. commented 2026-07-17 09:53:22 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦56 |
| 185779946 (Comments: 1) | Kushal_supertramp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185893863 commented 2026-07-17 09:51:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦665 |
| 185242530 (Comments: 2) | Sreejabhaduri (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry, this is pretty good changeset, but your later edits have the problems of many wrong buildings mapping, as following one of your changesets (your other changesets may contain same problems) https://osmcha.org/changesets/185794851 commented 2026-07-17 09:09:10 UTC by IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C ♦8 |
| 185801762 (Comments: 1) | Sreejabhaduri (Discussed changesets: 3) | Incorrect and useless building geometries and wrong outlines. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185242530 commented 2026-07-17 08:57:33 UTC by IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C ♦8 |
| 185690720 (Comments: 1) | Jaison Varghese (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185885182 commented 2026-07-17 06:10:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦665 |
| 185701675 (Comments: 1) | hiyozau (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185831874 commented 2026-07-17 06:06:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦665 |
| 185825514 (Comments: 1) | Amruta Sandip Patil (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). I think you may not be targetting the correct features ... commented 2026-07-17 00:49:04 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦787 |
| 185825431 (Comments: 1) | Amruta Sandip Patil (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). Please provide a more appropriate comment in future. The origi... commented 2026-07-17 00:29:21 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦787 |
| 185859409 (Comments: 1) | DD0909 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-07-17 00:22:34 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦787 |
| 185402773 (Comments: 1) | ramshi04 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Based on what except for the imagery are your changes? This is the third time you changed the road in a way that is not representing the reality nor is usable in navigation systems. What you are drawing as two different roads here, is in reality one ... commented 2026-07-16 10:42:37 UTC by CireR ♦1 |
| 184190313 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | The route is gone. Thick grass impossible to hike through. commented 2026-07-16 07:54:32 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 184026109 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | It is in very bad shape. Better to keep it as a standalone regional or lcoal trail. commented 2026-07-16 07:49:47 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 184031383 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bhandardara Traverse route updated: 1. From Ghattan Devi Mandir to Kulang the Hivlyachi Daar is unfortunately being converted into a road now. New trail (ghatvaats) are added west of the crestline (Jamunde - Ladhewadi - Ghattan Devi Temple) and Pa... commented 2026-07-16 07:48:31 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 184110958 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | Lonavala to Bhimashankar route: 1. This route has a lot of road section. First from Lonavala to Valvand. Then from Kusur to Yelawali. Effectively this route was just 19 km trail. 2. Umer Dara route is a better trail skipping the road to... commented 2026-07-16 07:17:59 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 185742467 (Comments: 2) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | Sudhagad to Raigad route has been updated/modified. 1. The big road section from Taila Baila village to Ghutke village has been replaced by a dense forest trail west of Mahar Thana peak. The region is also further connected North towards Kalam... commented 2026-07-16 06:49:49 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 184263733 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | The trail to the fort is in very bad shape. It is better to connect a trail from the unnamed saddle between Gothivale and Kamthe commented 2026-07-16 06:39:44 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 185743710 (Comments: 2) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | The Pune to Pratapgad Traverse was updated/modified. 1. Since this ridgeline is a upranga (marathi for ridge that runs perpendicular to the main North South Sahyadri Spine) it is nice to use one ridgeline to hike East and then use a different ... commented 2026-07-16 06:29:52 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 161344814 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | Godnichi Naal route is very techincal. It is better to keep this route unmapped so that novice hikers do not venture close to this gully specially from the Desh side. commented 2026-07-16 06:08:27 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 161345351 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | Maashacaa Col is a very techincal climb and requires very high climbing experience. It is better to keep this route unmarked so that novice hikers do not approach this gully unprepared. commented 2026-07-16 06:07:00 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 185743921 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | The trail between Karjat to Jumma Patti is now a road. It was sad to see the red ribbons which were old trail markers that now stand on a wide road. The routes Matheran 1 and 2 were updated/modified. Now all the trails (all those trails that ... commented 2026-07-15 18:34:48 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 185743960 (Comments: 2) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | This route (Kadve Khind to Pol) was verified in Jan - Feb 2026 when I did the Epic Sahyadri Trail. Unfortunately, a very nice ridgeline trail lost. :( commented 2026-07-15 18:24:00 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 185744009 (Comments: 1) | AskManav (Discussed changesets: 15) | Changed the route from National to Regional. Too small to be national. commented 2026-07-15 18:09:50 UTC by AskManav ♦13 |
| 185772662 (Comments: 1) | Matracode (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am a local resident mapping Ward 51. I noticed parts of our neighborhood were missing and roads were incorrectly marked as dead-ends. I map to fix these broken routes so navigation and delivery apps actually work for the people living here. commented 2026-07-15 09:48:23 UTC by Matracode ♦1 |
| 185642163 (Comments: 1) | ComputerMJ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185770571 commented 2026-07-15 09:04:22 UTC by ajmat ♦263 |
| 185642518 (Comments: 1) | humptydumpty_1999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185768773 commented 2026-07-15 08:29:49 UTC by rajdhani ♦217 |
| 185642745 (Comments: 1) | rnoronha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed your new highway Way: 1537941164 as it duplicates existing highways and could disrupt routing. The OSM tag natural=tree_row should be used on a linear feature not an area. I've remove... commented 2026-07-15 06:26:14 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,272 |
| 185643305 (Comments: 1) | ComputerMJ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185702617 commented 2026-07-15 04:42:04 UTC by Wildsharky ♦665 |
| 185735199 (Comments: 1) | Soulwin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for contributing! This changeset renames the neighbourhood from “Aroma Nagar” to “Jammal City,” but the comment says the area name was misplaced. Could you please confirm the locally displayed name a... commented 2026-07-14 20:02:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,831 |
| 185636001 (Comments: 1) | Shravankk12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185712633 commented 2026-07-14 11:58:35 UTC by ajmat ♦263 |
| 185643549 (Comments: 1) | jojomi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185640988 commented 2026-07-14 09:57:16 UTC by MappingMore ♦585 |
| 185650340 (Comments: 2) | Arnav Ghule (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185698857 commented 2026-07-14 07:24:22 UTC by MappingMore ♦585 |
| 185622586 (Comments: 2) | Amelia Ind (Discussed changesets: 7) | Same problem as above with Way: 1537832586, it's removed. commented 2026-07-14 05:56:40 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,272 |
| 185644823 (Comments: 1) | Peruvaje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good... commented 2026-07-14 04:46:00 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦787 |
| 185581745 (Comments: 1) | afedafna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, your new road Way: afed road (1537654650) duplicates the existing highway, thus it could disrupt routing. I've removed it. Please make corrections to any existing features. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-07-13 05:55:53 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,272 |
| 185377215 (Comments: 4) | ニュースモティハリ (Discussed changesets: 14) | Way: 1536672452 was removed as it duplicated existing highways and could disrupt routing. commented 2026-07-12 05:53:03 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,272 |