| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 173216506 (Comments: 1) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 170) | https://www.assens.dk/om-os/nyt-fra-assens-kommune/nyheder-og-pressemeddelelser/forvent-laengere-rejsetid-ved-glamsbjerg-fra-mandag-den-3-marts commented 2025-10-14 05:54:08 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,708 |
 | 163952369 (Comments: 1) | Bocian999 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229982414 - Lidl planowany (tak jak to opisałeś), czy w budowie, co wynika z landuse=construction? commented 2025-10-14 05:51:16 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
| 173216977 (Comments: 1) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 170) | Forældede ortofotos giver utidssvarende opdateringer. commented 2025-10-14 05:48:32 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,708 |
 | 173076431 (Comments: 2) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 324) | Nein da noch nicht. Der Hang ist schön gemacht und Rasen angesät, aber die Rohre sind am Kanal noch da. commented 2025-10-14 05:46:36 UTC by geozeisig ♦228 |
| 173226525 (Comments: 3) | Hans Henrik Krohn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Præcis. commented 2025-10-14 05:40:12 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,708 |
 | 173090272 (Comments: 3) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, noted on your remarks on placement tags. We will communicate your request to the project managers. Thank you for making the corrections here. commented 2025-10-14 05:35:08 UTC by Byenin ♦36 |
| 173090977 (Comments: 3) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, noted on your remarks on placement tags. We will communicate your request to the project managers. Thank you for making the corrections here. commented 2025-10-14 05:34:02 UTC by Byenin ♦36 |
 | 173084254 (Comments: 3) | Shel_Sri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Mappin' Jack Flash, I have made the edit thinking that combining the two nodes would enhance routing and eliminate additional voice instructions by apps using OSM data for navigation, unless the small offset was due to a precise micromapp... commented 2025-10-14 05:27:29 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦5 |
| 173049776 (Comments: 3) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, noted on your remarks on placement tags. We will communicate your request to the project managers. Thank you for making the corrections here, also in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173090977 and https://www.opens... commented 2025-10-14 05:27:17 UTC by Tinetto ♦6 |
| 171177700 (Comments: 5) | hejmichel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also es sah aus wie Kohle. Richtig bestätigen kann ich es auch nicht. commented 2025-10-14 05:25:56 UTC by hejmichel ♦1 |
| 173234439 (Comments: 2) | hertipau (Discussed changesets: 5) | Das stimmt wohl, so steht es auf ihrer Internetseite. Aber vor Ort stellt sich das so da, dass die Apotheke sich in Hausnummer 383 befindet, und rechts daneben ein weiteres Ladenlokal auf Hausnumer 381. Laut ALKIS sind das zwei getrennte Gebäude... commented 2025-10-14 05:11:30 UTC by hertipau ♦4 |
| 173172569 (Comments: 1) | 無限の刃 (Discussed changesets: 7) | OSMでは、既存のオブジェクトを流用することが良いとされていますので、「最終編集が古く、空中写真と大きく乖離する」というだけで簡単に削除しないで下さい。 今までの編集履歴... commented 2025-10-14 04:35:08 UTC by okadatsuneo ♦80 |
| X | 173241739 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edits-to-name-tags-of-ecuador-relation/136829 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173255056 commented 2025-10-14 04:32:37 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
 | 172983711 (Comments: 6) | MountSuckling (Discussed changesets: 6) | I have made the updates, have a nice day. commented 2025-10-14 04:25:32 UTC by MountSuckling ♦6 |
| 173123337 (Comments: 1) | sirish19 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello. When you edit the golf course, do you delete the existing object and then create a new one? It's good practice in OSM to update existing objects, so if there is an existing object, please update it first. commented 2025-10-14 04:22:40 UTC by okadatsuneo ♦80 |
 | 173206847 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo Saverin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good day. What sources are you using to add access tags here and in various other recent edits? If you have local knowledge or if you're using ground-level imagery of these places please mention this in your changesets. Legal access=desti... commented 2025-10-14 04:21:44 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦160 |
 | 173254442 (Comments: 1) | brightj (Discussed changesets: 12) | And some cairns, since trail is hard to see under leaves in fall commented 2025-10-14 04:11:24 UTC by brightj ♦20 |
| 173233509 (Comments: 1) | DrFlexer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sehe ich das richtig das Du für die Bahnsteignummern den key ref verwendet hast? Statt ref müsste local_ ref verwendet werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public%20transport=stop%20position?uselang=de commented 2025-10-14 03:32:05 UTC by Kartibu ♦10 |
| 169831512 (Comments: 2) | NIWE1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Also, please square the buildings with the "Q" shortcut. commented 2025-10-14 03:23:02 UTC by Adam Franco ♦164 |
 | 173243186 (Comments: 1) | Atavoidirc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Atavoidirc, you changed the original Wikipedia article to a redirect link, i.e en:UTC−01:00 → en:UTC-01:00. Please review your edit. commented 2025-10-14 02:52:27 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦106 |
| 173249810 (Comments: 2) | Deftax (Discussed changesets: 8) | 2. Nie wolno tak robić! Nie usuwamy całości z myślą zostawienia na później. Jak w tym momencie teraz ktoś pobierze dane to zostanie na lata pusty obszar, a tak się realnie dzieje. I obszar jest jak najbardziej do przywr&o... commented 2025-10-14 02:28:04 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,148 |
| 173248674 (Comments: 1) | edonasmajli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. The object you modified represents the park - by changing it to woods, you removed the park information. You should make a new one to represent the woods. Let me know if you have any questions ... commented 2025-10-14 02:13:54 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 173251247 (Comments: 1) | Fan7787 (Discussed changesets: 22) | if it isn't starting construction until 2032, it doesn't belong on OSM (yet) commented 2025-10-14 02:07:47 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
 | 173251576 (Comments: 1) | marasigankayla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the footpritns you added here do not represent buildings, but rather 'roof furniture' like walls. Cross reference Bing to see the disparity beween the shadow length cast by the buildings and these features on the roof. Read my project c... commented 2025-10-14 01:56:24 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173245608 (Comments: 1) | filipbryyyyl (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-14 00:56:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173245157 (Comments: 1) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442008550 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-10-14 00:56:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173245121 (Comments: 1) | Judyta Filipiak (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173241213 (Comments: 1) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. "Pułaskiego": https://www.openstreetmap.org/w... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173247356 (Comments: 1) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077427448 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173238860 (Comments: 1) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13231025077 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173234729 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173235793 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:45 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173237545 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:43 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173249871 (Comments: 1) | kubzon7 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12121184912 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-14 00:55:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173206548 (Comments: 3) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 85) | Hey, for what it's worth thanks for trying I appreciate it! commented 2025-10-14 00:46:49 UTC by stevethomp ♦1 |
| 173251818 (Comments: 1) | Foxscotch (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is an uncomfortably large changeset, but there was literally no sidewalk info beforehand, and I had trouble deciding where to break it up. I just wanted to acknowledge that lol commented 2025-10-14 00:45:15 UTC by Foxscotch ♦1 |
| 173231555 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 180) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229992042 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:21 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173229578 (Comments: 1) | Patryk Piotrowski (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173223209 (Comments: 2) | Patryk Piotrowski (Discussed changesets: 13) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173223808 (Comments: 1) | sapphir (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173225248 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-14 00:43:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173251714 (Comments: 1) | Captain Cub (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed covered parking by River Hollow Road. commented 2025-10-14 00:38:48 UTC by Captain Cub ♦1 |
| 173195087 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello there, is there any reason you deleted that address node that was, from what I gathered, correct? In the meantime I have re-added the address node. Thank you. commented 2025-10-14 00:26:52 UTC by UnusualWorld ♦7 |
| 142526159 (Comments: 1) | epestone (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Climbing#Approach says: "The tag path=climbing_access should be used for paths dedicated to access climbing crags, not for general hiking." commented 2025-10-14 00:22:14 UTC by brightj ♦20 |
| X | 173240989 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Could you please not make large bounding boxes like this one? Please edit in only one country per edit. Thank you. commented 2025-10-13 23:57:21 UTC by UnusualWorld ♦7 |
| 173238285 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel Chow (Discussed changesets: 1) | The lanudse here should not include building footprintsm and could be more accurate. Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features#Common_landuse_key_values_-_rural_and_agricultural_land for reference of exisiting tagging schemes. Please kee... commented 2025-10-13 23:56:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173221628 (Comments: 1) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | ale w każdej wspólnocie mieszkaniowej będziesz ustawiał permissive? ;] Przecież po tych ścieżkach, trawnikach i tp kżdy może wejśc, nie ma bramy, jakaś ochrona w ogóle krąży i wyprasza ludzi jak np pies nie wiem... nie ma... commented 2025-10-13 23:12:53 UTC by Yog Sot ♦316 |
| X | 173250417 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse2 (Discussed changesets: 65) | What I had to do to edit the SR was to load the SR into iD by editing it from the website, then moving to https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/53.3102525/-1.8310127 where both stages 1 and 2 are. From stage 2 (which was a member of the SR) I could ... commented 2025-10-13 22:55:26 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦470 |
 | 173227283 (Comments: 2) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 188) | Si, no hay problema commented 2025-10-13 22:49:34 UTC by AgusQui ♦606 |
| 173110354 (Comments: 4) | i2004 (Discussed changesets: 65) | Revertido. commented 2025-10-13 22:45:53 UTC by AgusQui ♦606 |
 | 160117969 (Comments: 6) | mavOsaure (Discussed changesets: 4) | Merci de ta proposition: ça parait une bonne solution en attendant qu'un contributeur hypermotivé mappe le parking souterrain complet! commented 2025-10-13 22:20:24 UTC by mavOsaure ♦39 |
 | 173176041 (Comments: 2) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 26) | Да, моя ошибка. Обычно тру, когда выставляю отдельные building:part, здесь он был косячный, без этажностей commented 2025-10-13 22:19:18 UTC by empty_child ♦354 |
| 166579953 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 33) | Salut, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9779712935 : le nom c'est juste Chope et Compagnie commented 2025-10-13 21:58:38 UTC by trial ♦942 |
| 173086752 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 421) | Ceci n 'est pas le nom de l'agence. Merci de ne pas transformer OSM pour plaire à vos clients. La réalité sur le terrain prévaut. Operator=Yannick Guillaume, peut-être. commented 2025-10-13 21:56:25 UTC by trial ♦942 |
 | 172910124 (Comments: 3) | Arber V (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for confirming this highway is open. I’ll remove the access=no tag. commented 2025-10-13 21:53:40 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦16 |
| 173248741 (Comments: 1) | AkinBZH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci pour l'ajout, mais l'entreprise N'est PAS sur le pas de porte. Vous confondez l'adresse (qui est à la bonne place) et l'entrepise (qui est dans le bâtiment). commented 2025-10-13 21:48:04 UTC by trial ♦942 |
| 173246187 (Comments: 1) | Philet2137 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173249071 commented 2025-10-13 21:43:58 UTC by bartgron ♦268 |
| 172723942 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Skala bzdurnych edycji jest tak duża, że chyba można hurtem wycofać je wszystkie bez weryfikacji. commented 2025-10-13 21:36:08 UTC by uprkos ♦55 |
 | 173232947 (Comments: 1) | TBonanno (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao TBonanno, addr:city e addr:postcode andrebbero usati insieme a addr:street e addr:housenumber per formare un indirizzo completo; ma gli indirizzi si usano laddove ha senso, cioè sugli ingressi a edifici o proprietà nel punto dove &... commented 2025-10-13 21:36:07 UTC by totera ♦302 |
 | 143334997 (Comments: 1) | ShakyIsles (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi ShakyIsles, in this changeset you named way 7632531 "Park Edge Terrace". Do you remember what the source reference was for this? Thanks commented 2025-10-13 21:34:47 UTC by CoyKoi ♦231 |
 | 147152323 (Comments: 3) | GBF-Faschina-Damüls (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh nein, die Nachricht ist mir untergegangen. Ja, hast recht, im Bearbeiter-Tool fallen solche Fehler leider oft nicht auf und ich bemerke sie oft erst, wenn die Änderungen Online sind. Alles sehr zeitaufwendig, wenn dir was auffällt bitte ... commented 2025-10-13 21:30:26 UTC by GBF-Faschina-Damüls ♦1 |
| 173178639 (Comments: 1) | 5802499c (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Here you have a) removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182156241 although this object should probably represent a building and have a building tag, b) mapped 2 nested horse riding centres (https://www.openstreet... commented 2025-10-13 21:28:05 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦823 |
| 172933105 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Prawdopodobnie kolejne fikcyjne przystanki. commented 2025-10-13 21:27:22 UTC by uprkos ♦55 |
 | 172975525 (Comments: 2) | dcskobuffs (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hello tuxnux, thanks for reaching out! These edits were made based on painted arrows visible in the cited Vantor Satellite Imagery dated 2025-09-30. Apple has an agreement with Vantor Hub (previously Maxar) to use their more recent imagery to edi... commented 2025-10-13 21:19:57 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦66 |
 | 173248109 (Comments: 1) | gimbenson (Discussed changesets: 1) | 안녕하세요 gimbenson, 환영합니다! 귀하의 기여에 감사드립니다! 협력을 쉽게 하기 위해 다른 사람들이 귀하의 편집을 이해할 수 있도록 변경한 내용에 대한 짧은 설명을 추가하는 것이 ... commented 2025-10-13 21:16:55 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
 | 172993735 (Comments: 1) | Petró Tamás (Discussed changesets: 15) | Kedves Tamás! Valóban megszűnt, én jelentettem a kozkutak oldalán. Helyette van nem messze tőle egy új ivókút. Koordinátája: N47 33.122 E21 37.660 commented 2025-10-13 21:11:18 UTC by iTSiPoK ♦1 |
| 173247528 (Comments: 1) | 617-boston-movers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-13 20:54:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 173187051 (Comments: 2) | JiahuiY (Discussed changesets: 11) | The north part of Sidney Smith St and the east-side path on University Crescent are indeed still just gravel/base layers, but there’s no active construction and they’re open for public use, barrier have also been removed (only a sign sayi... commented 2025-10-13 20:48:31 UTC by JiahuiY ♦2 |
 | 173154359 (Comments: 1) | AlwynWellington (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hello, You've removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863329639#map=20/51.3219246/-0.5583903 (which was part of a cycle route) here. Has that parallel cycleway really been removed? Must cyclists now either push their bikes on the pavement... commented 2025-10-13 20:40:11 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦470 |
| 173131856 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | Hallo mueschel Ich gehe davon aus, du hast die Diskusion gelesen. in diesem Fall ging es nicht um ownership=private sondern darum diesen Weg unsichtbar zu machen. Da der Weg eine Sackgasse ist, laut Eigentümer auch nicht sic... commented 2025-10-13 20:27:33 UTC by berndw ♦622 |
 | 173198000 (Comments: 1) | NxStep (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, What does https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4354750993 (“Parada, caballos” / “Horse transport”) stand for? This node was originally tagged with highway=bus_stop and was later changed to leisure=horse_riding. However, t... commented 2025-10-13 20:23:45 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦823 |
| 172768510 (Comments: 4) | Leporids (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-13 20:19:25 UTC by Leporids ♦1 |
 | 108050117 (Comments: 3) | Sasa Uncanin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Znaika, Thank you for contribution. You can check all street names and home adresses with attached photos and documents on official municipality site: https://gisportal.budva.me/smartPortal/AdreseJavno You're right, this street have ... commented 2025-10-13 20:14:06 UTC by Sasa Uncanin ♦2 |
| 173138783 (Comments: 2) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Thank you for the feedback. I will note this for future mapping. Please invalidate the task and it will be fixed and aligned. Thank you again! commented 2025-10-13 20:13:18 UTC by magneticred ♦1 |
| 173146249 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 425) | Ty jesteś największym szkodnikiem. commented 2025-10-13 20:12:31 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
| 173198989 (Comments: 2) | Freeviv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, danke für den Hinweis, habe ich geändert. 😊 commented 2025-10-13 20:10:25 UTC by Freeviv ♦2 |
 | 173224264 (Comments: 3) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Gracias a ti por responder. En OpenStreetMap no está permitido usar datos de guentes que no nos hayan dado permiso. Obviamente, no tenemos permiso de Google para copiar o usar sus datos. Tenemos permiso explícito para usar datos de algu... commented 2025-10-13 20:09:52 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,691 |
| 173231534 (Comments: 1) | Turtlehats (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Turtlehats, thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately I had to revert your changes. I'm not exactly sure what you were trying to map but you created a path on top of a already mapped track and moved a node incorrectly on joseph parry ... commented 2025-10-13 20:08:45 UTC by kitsee ♦103 |
| 173245419 (Comments: 1) | mufasamufasa (Discussed changesets: 1) | excluir essa informação commented 2025-10-13 20:01:43 UTC by mufasamufasa ♦1 |
| 173211915 (Comments: 1) | Lavellan (Discussed changesets: 1) | нет, это не почтовые отделения commented 2025-10-13 19:56:27 UTC by literan ♦6,831 |
| 172372725 (Comments: 2) | bacon4streetmaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed everything that appears to be a duplicate --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172372725 commented 2025-10-13 19:56:10 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦116 |
| 171967447 (Comments: 1) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 173) | Hallo wermak, leider kann ich deine Änderungen im Ortsgebiet Stetten a.k.M. nicht nachvollziehen. Einzelne Gehwege wurden fast schon willkürlich entfernt. Außerdem wurden Gebäude, die vor mehr als einem Jahr abgebrannt ... commented 2025-10-13 19:49:57 UTC by flobo593 ♦3 |
| 173243725 (Comments: 1) | Narendran Thanikavel (Discussed changesets: 2) | this parking lot was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451142616 - did you mean to duplicate it? commented 2025-10-13 19:49:37 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 172961278 (Comments: 5) | inechcomtv (Discussed changesets: 3) | حسنًا، فقط من فضلك، لا تُضِف كلمة "نسمة" إلى population، اكتب الرقم فقط. ولا تُضِف عدد السكان إلى population:date... فهذا الحقل مخصّص للتاريخ. commented 2025-10-13 19:47:45 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 173242258 (Comments: 1) | Narendran Thanikavel (Discussed changesets: 2) | what is "boom"? commented 2025-10-13 19:46:05 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 141469400 (Comments: 1) | k127 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hello k127, can you help at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5000322 commented 2025-10-13 19:38:21 UTC by FroschForscher ♦80 |
| 173223931 (Comments: 2) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola gracias. Lo tendré en cuenta. Un saludo. commented 2025-10-13 19:35:58 UTC by jorafa051194 ♦2 |
| 173145992 (Comments: 1) | Ekeefoof (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, wieso horse=yes. Der Weg ist doch angeblich mit 241 beschildert? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173145992 commented 2025-10-13 19:31:35 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,398 |
| 173149809 (Comments: 1) | Popelka94 (Discussed changesets: 1) | tagging von fahrradstraßen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes ich berichtige es. Grüße Langläufer --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... commented 2025-10-13 19:24:11 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,398 |
 | 173003434 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Will you please stop mapping "abandoned" roads that have been demolished in reality, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436424183? That stuff is for OpenHistoricalMap, not our project. commented 2025-10-13 19:21:43 UTC by ika-chan! ♦288 |
| 171330810 (Comments: 3) | Interteutones (Discussed changesets: 80) | ich fix es flott bevor ichs vergesse commented 2025-10-13 19:19:41 UTC by Bierphysik ♦91 |
| 173231435 (Comments: 1) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola jorafa, Gracias por mejorar OSM, pero en este conjunto de datos hemos detectado que había añadido el nombre de un hotel y de una gasolinera en edificios. Esto ha sido incorrecto porque dicha información ya está... commented 2025-10-13 19:15:53 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,691 |
| 173183888 (Comments: 1) | Harzklub-BadGrund (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Harzklub. Willkommen bei OSM. Du hat ein paar ungereimtheiten hinterlassen. Wenn "freigegeben worden" wieso dann access=no? Wenn es wieder ein begehbarer Pfad (highway=path) ist dann muss abandoned:highway=path weg ... commented 2025-10-13 19:13:29 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,398 |
| 173242790 (Comments: 1) | charl3s (Discussed changesets: 193) | Mógłbyś bardziej konkretnie opisywać swoje zmiany? Patrz zasady: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 19:13:04 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 162771372 (Comments: 1) | J3ckV (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, could you share the source of those changes? I wonder if there's much change since 8 months ago. commented 2025-10-13 19:08:42 UTC by dzidek23 ♦62 |
| 172964652 (Comments: 1) | avenue2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | any chance you know (or can update) the trail visibility? I only see maybe a small section visible from satellite, and nothing obvious shows up on strava or 3dep. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2025-10-13 18:53:51 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦116 |
| 173063956 (Comments: 2) | VLD289 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi rskedgell, Thanks for reaching out! I have re-added the ref tags and will keep this feedback in mind going forward. -VLD289 commented 2025-10-13 18:48:33 UTC by VLD289 ♦1 |
 | 173239259 (Comments: 1) | JeffPy (Discussed changesets: 1) | AFAIK, this mural no longer exists, because the building along which it had been painted, has been razed. This is very clearly stated in the object on the map, and in the changeset description. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4591422703<... commented 2025-10-13 18:43:06 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,572 |
| 173082615 (Comments: 1) | maramutze2018 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ahoi, du hast hier einen kleinen Fehler gemacht, der aber große Folgen hat. Der Weserbergland-Weg ist in 13 Etappen aufgeteilt, die in einer superroute zusammengefasst sind. Du hast das neue Wegestück in die superroute eingepflegt und n... commented 2025-10-13 18:38:57 UTC by DeFra85 ♦252 |
| 173190976 (Comments: 2) | mkuentzl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke! Wird angepasst. commented 2025-10-13 18:37:00 UTC by mkuentzl ♦1 |
| 172883599 (Comments: 1) | beatpoet (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, I've removed amenity=pub from the Hoops Inn as it's still being refurbished, the tag should only be re-added once it officially reopens. The website says this will be in early 2026. commented 2025-10-13 18:23:45 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦93 |
| 173197563 (Comments: 1) | dieter60 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo dieter60, vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag. Ich wundere mich, dass die Häuser Nr. 109 und 111-113 jetzt nicht mehr an derselben Baulinie ausgerichtet sind wie die übrigen Häuser an der Straße, und dass das Haus Nr. 117 f... commented 2025-10-13 18:23:39 UTC by Romwriter ♦203 |
| 171528518 (Comments: 1) | trailschneck (Discussed changesets: 57) | Eine Notiz hier sagt, dass man die Toiletten nicht löschen möge und auf der Website der Stadt ist hier auch eine öffentliche Toilette vorhanden. Was war der Anlass zur Löschung? commented 2025-10-13 18:17:55 UTC by dreua ♦121 |
| 136099452 (Comments: 4) | George S (Discussed changesets: 17) | This shows some of paths (I think the yellow dashed lines) https://www.adirondackrock.com/vol2_166-173.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqc8F7DtRSLmideaNEX_yq1DyoCgeKkEJthwhgXz1gIJ9FUhcGq commented 2025-10-13 18:13:34 UTC by George S ♦8 |
| 173236003 (Comments: 1) | FF Jaderberg_Wasserstellenwart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung: Die Wohnfläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441929537 liegt jetzt auf der Brachfläch... commented 2025-10-13 18:10:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
 | 172982942 (Comments: 3) | ParmaCanal (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Novelgomez, I reclassified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241478625 to path since residential and paths are normally for neighborhood roads, which is what these roads appear to be. Based on policy regarding secondaries (https://wiki.... commented 2025-10-13 18:02:47 UTC by ParmaCanal ♦2 |
| 170758161 (Comments: 5) | BibiOSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Si, effettivamente per le auto ha senso mettere privato. commented 2025-10-13 17:49:41 UTC by mtorchiano ♦3 |
 | 114230476 (Comments: 1) | kook543 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej! Hur kom du fram till nya hastighetsgränser som skiljer sig från den skyltade? Kan klart ha hänt en del på fyra år men nu skiljer sig OSM från NJDB, och jag tänker att NJDB borde väl innehålla den... commented 2025-10-13 17:36:30 UTC by Hidoo00 ♦75 |
 | 173212996 (Comments: 2) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 122) | oh cool, gute Idee, merci :) commented 2025-10-13 17:29:56 UTC by Piagno ♦108 |
| 165582779 (Comments: 2) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 143) | grazie per il check commented 2025-10-13 17:27:48 UTC by damianeue ♦114 |
| 173215579 (Comments: 1) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello, "operator", that means who is responsible for the platform (sign), is only the ASEAG. Neither there is a TEC sign nor TEC would fix it in case of damage (or update the timetable...). Regarding "network": The bus line ... commented 2025-10-13 17:22:19 UTC by aixbrick ♦862 |
 | 173238801 (Comments: 1) | ـــــــــــــ (Discussed changesets: 1) | سلام، خوش آمدید و از مشارکت شما تشکر می کنیم! برای اینکه همکاری راحت تر شود و دیگران تغییرات شما را بهتر بفهمند، بهترین کار این است که ی... commented 2025-10-13 17:16:59 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 171666013 (Comments: 4) | MWpg (Discussed changesets: 2) | My apologies, you're right! I'll fix that. commented 2025-10-13 17:03:24 UTC by MWpg ♦1 |
| 173234254 (Comments: 1) | Ayoub2049 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great work! Consider selecting each building and pressing Q to square it and make it look better. Also consider using building=apartments, which is more precise than building=residential. commented 2025-10-13 17:02:18 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
 | 171069297 (Comments: 1) | RomanMinárik (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdravim, cyklocesta ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263243624 nie je na hradzi? Preco ste to po celej dlzke odstranili? Cyklocesta od rieky ku hradu uz bola zakreslena, pridanie paralelnej cesty ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425252... commented 2025-10-13 16:59:54 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 173225598 (Comments: 1) | Cebderby (Discussed changesets: 43) | I agree with you, not sure why user UtterCutter changed to Saint. Having driven this road it is definitely labelled St. Francis Farm. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 16:49:34 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦101 |
| 173204948 (Comments: 1) | guillemmal (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hola. Usar una frontera nacional como parte de un polígono natural ya me causa ruido, aunque no sé si necesariamente está mal, pero el tamaño de ese bare_rock no puede estar bien. Basta un simple "sobrevuelo" ... commented 2025-10-13 16:49:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 173231387 (Comments: 2) | Cebderby (Discussed changesets: 43) | I am entirely familiar with it. I suggest you read the page you link to, including the parts you don't agree with. eg paragraph 2 not just paragraph 1. commented 2025-10-13 16:46:57 UTC by Cebderby ♦302 |
| 173102217 (Comments: 3) | JLZIMMERMANN (Discussed changesets: 50) | You want to tag the area that contains all the containers and (depending on design) might have a different paving style or some kind of small wall around it? commented 2025-10-13 16:46:49 UTC by mueschel ♦6,681 |
| 156923786 (Comments: 1) | Mariho (Discussed changesets: 6) | Niet seasonal ? commented 2025-10-13 16:33:33 UTC by philippec ♦744 |
| 173116790 (Comments: 4) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 168) | Yes, I know. As I said in my previous comment: I removed those irrelevant tags again. commented 2025-10-13 16:27:39 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦453 |
| 173203435 (Comments: 1) | nitemoon (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello. I have reverted your edits because they were based on outdated aerial imagery sources. These buildings were part of a middle school that moved one block north. I've been to these sites in person, and you can verify these changes for yours... commented 2025-10-13 16:16:43 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 160489977 (Comments: 1) | Manojkumar Yerraguntla (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Just wondering why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344694712/history/1 and a few others are tagged as layer -1? Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-13 16:07:50 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,398 |
| 76773673 (Comments: 1) | Merzof (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi Merzof Any idea still why you added 5 79 Oxford Roads with different postcodes? Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-13 15:57:08 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,398 |
| 173211100 (Comments: 1) | Reisinformatiegroep (Discussed changesets: 84) | Hello, Please avoid clicking on "suggestions" from the iD editor. A lot of those suggestions are plainly wrong, in particular those related to public transport. (The list they use for their suggestions contains bad values, for inst... commented 2025-10-13 15:49:01 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,572 |
 | 173232784 (Comments: 2) | deime (Discussed changesets: 2) | Typo.. Probeer op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Het is even zoeken soms. commented 2025-10-13 15:44:27 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
 | 166864947 (Comments: 4) | PulisakZ (Discussed changesets: 50) | This wasn't just one single incident. I would actually claim that there's a significant amount of similar cases created by your team. So maybe you should look into this a bit further? I created this overpass script to check these 15 ... commented 2025-10-13 15:40:06 UTC by houtari ♦52 |
| 173115545 (Comments: 8) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | "there are English-language speakers (as learned language) outside this countries, far more than Russian-language speakers (as learned language)" How many of these L2 English speakers reside INSIDE Europe, but OUTSIDE of the UK, Ireland,... commented 2025-10-13 15:33:06 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 166171576 (Comments: 2) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 36) | Adresse auf Migrolino-Gebäude hier hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173233945 commented 2025-10-13 15:31:50 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 173233945 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 390) | Adresse auf Migrolino-Gebäude aus https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/351_all.osm.zip :) commented 2025-10-13 15:31:17 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 173216464 (Comments: 1) | FRANCESCA913 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. OpenStreetMap non e' il posto giusto dove inserire i propri percorsi. Ciao, Andrea commented 2025-10-13 15:26:15 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,456 |
| 160175955 (Comments: 3) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 21) | I have removed this footway because after going for a walk I found it is a private area. It is certainly artificial but its not intelligent. Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-13 15:25:23 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,398 |
| 159634256 (Comments: 1) | Sai_Dontukurti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello I am puzzled as to why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338100284 is on layer -1? Cheers Phil commented 2025-10-13 15:18:15 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,398 |
| 164625242 (Comments: 1) | topius (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ciao topius In this changeset you've added the tagless way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375549660 I've seen this happen for myself with Go Map!!, too when (mis)clicking. I've remove the way in https://www.openstreetmap.... commented 2025-10-13 15:15:07 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 106277343 (Comments: 5) | uwe-shwbl (Discussed changesets: 17) | Perfekt. Vielen Dank. commented 2025-10-13 15:03:03 UTC by uwe-shwbl ♦22 |
| 172486209 (Comments: 2) | CaptainCarte (Discussed changesets: 37) | Well, the in/out Nodes could be tagged with inlet/outlet. I'm not really sure if it is a spillway in the first place or just a constant drain (altough the definitionbetween those are a bit flexible) commented 2025-10-13 14:54:56 UTC by CaptainCarte ♦16 |
| 166653871 (Comments: 3) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 53) | On the [chat](https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$17603452323692MDzkh:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=kde.org&via=matrix.domainepublic.net), people tended towards not treating this line differently than other pre-metro systems. ... commented 2025-10-13 14:49:48 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,260 |
| 173201265 (Comments: 2) | Kawsar Hosain (Discussed changesets: 5) | I left them a DM since there hasn't been any reaction yet --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173201265 commented 2025-10-13 14:47:21 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,636 |
| 173229337 (Comments: 1) | Reporter80 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Reporter. Voor de rendering van de namen kunnen de pois iets meer uit elkaar. Ik heb ze iets uit elkaar gezet. Denk nog wat meer. Up to you. Groet eggie commented 2025-10-13 14:41:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173158690 (Comments: 3) | kupteri (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://maavoimat.fi/en/-/maavoimien-ampuma-ja-harjoitusalueet "Taisteluampumapaikan rajat on merkitty maastoon erikokoisilla kylteillä. Teiden ja polkujen suunnissa liikkumisrajoitukset ilmaistaan varoitustauluilla, joita alueella l... commented 2025-10-13 14:40:11 UTC by kupteri ♦4 |
| 173125383 (Comments: 1) | manuei1994 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, du hast beim Badesteg der Therme angegeben, dass Boote dort festmachen können. Bist du dir da sicher? :) commented 2025-10-13 14:39:32 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,938 |
| 173230005 (Comments: 1) | mjayne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-13 14:34:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173227255 (Comments: 3) | deime (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay... merged! thx. commented 2025-10-13 14:33:02 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173162337 (Comments: 1) | guillemmal (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hola. Hay varios services e incluso unclassifieds acá que me dan la impresión de ser tracks. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173162337 ... commented 2025-10-13 14:29:38 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 173227350 (Comments: 1) | Chris Dekker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback: warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway \t Je pad heeft geen verbinding aan de zuidkant met het al bestaa... commented 2025-10-13 14:27:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173162983 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 155) | Le Parc confirme. Merci de la modification ! Comme je n'édite pas très souvent, j'en profite : on est géoparc mondial unesco également, depuis 2024. Est-ce qu'il y a une classe spécifique pour ajouter... commented 2025-10-13 14:26:16 UTC by Parc naturel régional Normandie-Maine ♦2 |
| 173230334 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 106) | * source=The Waltham Forest (Parking Places, Loading Places and Waiting, Loading and Stopping Restrictions) Order 2025 commented 2025-10-13 14:25:17 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 173230448 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 106) | * source=The Waltham Forest (Parking Places, Loading Places and Waiting, Loading and Stopping Restrictions) Order 2025 commented 2025-10-13 14:25:08 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
 | 173171663 (Comments: 3) | JohnW11 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Done! commented 2025-10-13 14:16:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 171051932 (Comments: 1) | loser1k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately barrier=yes isn't very effective for blocking routers as it is prottey vague, it nay be gate or a stile which are passable. After a survey I have updated them to barrier=fence. |
| 163979594 (Comments: 2) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Jo, du har vist ret. Der står at material=rock skal undgås. Det skal jeg prøve at huske. Tak skal du have. commented 2025-10-13 14:12:46 UTC by cyclist789 ♦37 |
| 173177273 (Comments: 1) | jamesks (Discussed changesets: 111) | Are you sure things like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441615066 are actual paths, and not just one Strava user’s dog walking route? commented 2025-10-13 14:10:28 UTC by gurglypipe ♦933 |
| 173188763 (Comments: 2) | aaei924 (Discussed changesets: 18) | 관심가져 주셔서 감사합니다. 주신 링크를 살펴보았사온데, 하시고자 하는 말씀이 무엇인지 조금 자세히 알려주셨으면 합니다. 이 바뀜집합의 내용과 관련이 있는 것인가요? commented 2025-10-13 13:58:30 UTC by aaei924 ♦27 |
| 173190334 (Comments: 5) | Ozon OSM5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Спасибо. commented 2025-10-13 13:57:40 UTC by mavl ♦76,131 |
| 173072489 (Comments: 3) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 339) | Dank voor de uitleg en de handige link! commented 2025-10-13 13:55:28 UTC by Acetamide ♦2 |
| 173227047 (Comments: 1) | inechcomtv (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't add "نسمة" to the population. Only the number. And population:date shouldn't be a duplicate of the population, it's actually the date at which the population was calculated. commented 2025-10-13 13:49:11 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
 | 173136348 (Comments: 1) | Ben Schwarzmeier (Discussed changesets: 1) | 来旅游的是吧？谁叫你这么写了😅 commented 2025-10-13 13:45:26 UTC by Taksine ♦112 |
| 172622023 (Comments: 2) | moosieloosie (Discussed changesets: 1) | No response, so I've reinstated the woods that appear on imagery. commented 2025-10-13 13:31:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,938 |
| 173223286 (Comments: 1) | MR ROBIN DEFOE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you explain what your intention is with this tagging to an existing highway node, please? As such, it doesn't make any sense. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-10-13 13:28:48 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,938 |
| 158583697 (Comments: 3) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 79) | Obszar zabudowy zajmuje część dz. 44 (przy Chopina 119) oraz część dz. 49 (przy Świerkowej 12) - poprawione. commented 2025-10-13 13:25:29 UTC by cyganka ♦19 |
 | 173226946 (Comments: 1) | CAT Degree College (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-13 13:09:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 173224206 (Comments: 3) | Crewman182 (Discussed changesets: 2) | maybe I was wrong, after some browsing I found out the park seems to be new, the offices are gone and that indeed the location of the SAP office was off - I updated it to the correct building commented 2025-10-13 13:06:46 UTC by Crewman182 ♦2 |
 | 173224766 (Comments: 3) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 4) | И адресът на Кам-маркет-а не може да е с №710Б(както беше). №170 е номерът на блока отсреща... commented 2025-10-13 13:06:09 UTC by Fraxi ♦154 |
| 173220292 (Comments: 1) | 8462368 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-13 13:00:18 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173220587 (Comments: 1) | 8462368 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-13 13:00:10 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172952843 (Comments: 1) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 104) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:59:12 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173220650 (Comments: 1) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 104) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:59:05 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173221291 (Comments: 1) | user_17585027 (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-13 12:58:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172746484 (Comments: 1) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:57:28 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173222275 (Comments: 1) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:57:05 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 152188757 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:54:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173168784 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:54:13 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173169413 (Comments: 1) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:54:03 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173176750 (Comments: 2) | kloboda2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-13 12:53:54 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 171963404 (Comments: 2) | Verkehrsgemeinschaft Mittelthüringen GmbH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Harald Hartmann. Dass ich diesen Eintrag in die Master-Relation gepackt habe, war mir gar nicht bewusst. Allerdings fährt die Linie 203 von Masserberg nach Suhl nicht am Wochenende, sondern montags bis freitags alle 2 Stunden. Ist m. E. al... commented 2025-10-13 12:49:23 UTC by Verkehrsgemeinschaft Mittelthüringen GmbH ♦1 |
| 167494309 (Comments: 1) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 19) | Salut Mathias, Pour les voie piétonne avec un panneau B54 le bicycle=designated est peut un peux trop fort. (circuler à l’allure du pas ce n'est pas ma définition de designated ) Que dirais tu de mettre un bicycl... commented 2025-10-13 12:40:54 UTC by simon_geovelo ♦91 |
| 173224060 (Comments: 1) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 111) | Частично върната https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173225616 commented 2025-10-13 12:36:02 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 172954715 (Comments: 2) | firefoxinspace (Discussed changesets: 32) | Die Ein-/Ausfädelung ist während der Hauptverkehrszeit mit Einschränkungen verbunden, sodass kein ungebremster Vorgang möglich ist. Die Fuß- und Radwege entlang der T-Kreuzungen sind auch nicht höhenfrei. Noch dazu gibt... commented 2025-10-13 12:30:21 UTC by firefoxinspace ♦31 |
| 172516265 (Comments: 1) | mmich31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Suite à cette modif pour remplacer Repetto par K-Way tu n'as pas supprimé les tags mineurs : website, description, horaires, etc... Je m'en occupe ;) Et la boutique n'a pas encore ouvert je crois commented 2025-10-13 12:29:50 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦39 |
| 173160789 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets. However, based on the Vantor satellite imagery (via Vantor Hub, dated 2025-10-06), and (Esri World Imagery), it is clear that vehicles are moving ... commented 2025-10-13 12:19:50 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 171985522 (Comments: 1) | DenchikBorovoy2011 (Discussed changesets: 6) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 12:19:09 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 173015409 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets and With no evidence of addition oneway tag . Added the roads using an old imagery (Bing) Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436497... commented 2025-10-13 12:19:00 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 173224600 (Comments: 1) | Digitalbti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-13 12:18:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 173161060 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets with no evidence of the addition oneway tag. Modified the roads using old imagery (Bing) Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14364641... commented 2025-10-13 12:17:52 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 171906698 (Comments: 1) | mickleon (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 12:17:10 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 173161553 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets with no evidence of the addition oneway tag. And added other roads using old imagery (Bing) Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14415... commented 2025-10-13 12:17:05 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 165891373 (Comments: 7) | Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (Discussed changesets: 30) | Gerne. Beim November-Stammtisch bin ich wahrscheinlich nicht da (vorausgesetzt, der findet am 6.11. statt), aber den Dezember-Stammtisch würde ich mir dann einplanen. commented 2025-10-13 12:06:53 UTC by Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz ♦44 |
| 173172885 (Comments: 2) | cliveb (Discussed changesets: 7) | I’ve updated the tags. Thanks commented 2025-10-13 12:06:24 UTC by cliveb ♦3 |
 | 173222361 (Comments: 1) | Parons (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-13 12:03:48 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173220946 (Comments: 1) | Dueros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-13 12:03:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
 | 173222321 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Με ποιο σκεπτικό έγιναν οι αλλαγές σε highway=trunk; What is the justification for... commented 2025-10-13 11:51:52 UTC by PeachyOne ♦26 |
| 164256740 (Comments: 1) | andrea il greco bovina (Discussed changesets: 4) | rispetto a https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9150823#map=17/44.340509/11.378886&layers=N : da mia survey del 12 ottobre 2025, il tratto di sentiero tra il Ponte di via Zena (way 1363052136) e il bivio per la Torre dell'Erede (nodo 15597... commented 2025-10-13 11:51:03 UTC by Una tantum ♦19 |
| 173222705 (Comments: 1) | Haags Happie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi Haags Happie Je vraagt feedback. 'Paar kleine aanpassingen! ' zegt niemand iets. Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je doet. Bv betaalmogelijkheden aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-13 11:48:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
 | 173084980 (Comments: 2) | Maha Sharara (Discussed changesets: 1) | החזרתי את השינויים שעשית: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173223194 בבקשה תסביר מה ניסית לעשות לפני שאתה מנסה שוב, תודה commented 2025-10-13 11:48:04 UTC by NeatNit ♦35 |
| 171499207 (Comments: 8) | fmc_6 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ich danke dir! commented 2025-10-13 11:46:47 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦26 |
| 173217749 (Comments: 1) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi notabear, Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van nodes met alles dat er aan vast zit. Ook zijn je edits lastig te valideren. Beperk svp het gebied van je edits. Mapse, eggie commented 2025-10-13 11:44:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 65466087 (Comments: 1) | Tozzo (Discussed changesets: 20) | La way 127946696 non esiste, survey del 12 ottobre 2025, il castello si erge su un promontorio da quel lato, la strada dovrebbe andare in verticale arrampicandosi sulla parete rocciosa, ma proprio non esiste commented 2025-10-13 11:41:31 UTC by Una tantum ♦19 |
| 173221162 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Από που κι ως που ο δρόμος αυτός https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441856003 φαίνετ&alph... commented 2025-10-13 11:37:58 UTC by PeachyOne ♦26 |
| 173197829 (Comments: 2) | Map_HeRo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Du hast natürlich Recht, so ist das nix ;-). Schon verbessert, danke für den Hinweis. Gruß Mikke commented 2025-10-13 11:37:49 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦74 |
| 173199361 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | On i tak nie odpowiada na komentarze. Przywróciłem prawidłową nazwę. commented 2025-10-13 11:36:15 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
| 173221780 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ποιά είναι η λογική που μετατράπηκε το https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484377971 σ&... commented 2025-10-13 11:32:07 UTC by PeachyOne ♦26 |
| 173107962 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Wycofałem zmiany. commented 2025-10-13 11:30:14 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
 | 173174511 (Comments: 1) | Guy Maurel KONAN (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please have alook on https://www.osm.org/node/13227504173. What is the mean of the tag CODE_ADRES = 00203? commented 2025-10-13 11:27:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 164439854 (Comments: 3) | David Jazbec (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ja, das stimmt, allerdings scheint es ein „neutraler/nicht religiöser Friedhof“ zu sein, ich habe religion=no gesetzt, place of worship passt commented 2025-10-13 11:23:24 UTC by FirefighterCGH ♦25 |
| X | 173114086 (Comments: 2) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 168) | Feel free to join them commented 2025-10-13 11:18:05 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦453 |
| 173138938 (Comments: 2) | Zack Bowden (Discussed changesets: 39) | Good point, thanks for catching me out on that, my bad :P :D commented 2025-10-13 11:16:54 UTC by Zack Bowden ♦6 |
| 173161417 (Comments: 1) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | yo se que no hiciste hasta ahora zona norte me podras ayudar con las modificaciones que te mande el otro dia de la 707 y 333 commented 2025-10-13 11:13:27 UTC by i2004 ♦159 |
| 172878665 (Comments: 1) | m_shevtsov (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 11:07:50 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 173023627 (Comments: 3) | mapfel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für dein Verständnis! Dieser Changeset ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173221586 teilweise zurückgesetzt worden. commented 2025-10-13 11:07:27 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦263 |
| 170697573 (Comments: 1) | notalking (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 11:06:37 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 172586101 (Comments: 1) | NordFisherman (Discussed changesets: 2) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-10-13 11:06:19 UTC by dypa ♦139 |
| 172873732 (Comments: 2) | ilias_ (Discussed changesets: 20) | Yes commented 2025-10-13 11:04:36 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 166740401 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 31) | Здравей Termininja, В Борисовата градина няма още 10 парка като way/1368130113. landuse=grass (или proposed;landuse=grass) би било по-правилно. Поздрави, Митко commented 2025-10-13 11:02:38 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 172975242 (Comments: 2) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 150) | Different systems may use different codes from ISO 3166 to refer to this object, hence I included them all. Codes from ISO 3166-3 are unusual but in the case of Metropolitan France, FXFR refers to a territory that still exists present-day rather than... commented 2025-10-13 10:53:47 UTC by JeroenvanderGun ♦184 |
| 173160720 (Comments: 1) | みむみむ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1441542590. What is the mean of the tag paera=yes? Please note that the key area is not used in the key building because it is already included in the term. commented 2025-10-13 10:46:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 165353044 (Comments: 1) | AlexisL_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour AlexisL_, La bande cyclable que tu as voulu cartographiée rue de la Girafe était déjà cartographiée (voir les attributs de la rue de la Girafe). Pour cartographier, il faut absolument se r&eacu... commented 2025-10-13 10:41:57 UTC by AlbaireN ♦21 |
| 173198128 (Comments: 1) | MistyPigeon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding this, and welcome to OSM! commented 2025-10-13 10:39:35 UTC by spiregrain ♦209 |
| 155825812 (Comments: 2) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 40) | Zurückgesetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173219783 Danke für dein Verständnis! commented 2025-10-13 10:34:23 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦263 |
| 173101789 (Comments: 1) | Byron Williams (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the entire Gulf of Saint-Malo has been marked as an islet, this seems incorrect, can you review it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12913145/history Cheers commented 2025-10-13 10:32:26 UTC by aTarom ♦815 |
 | 172485213 (Comments: 2) | Own Oh (Discussed changesets: 52) | Yes, good point, thanks. commented 2025-10-13 10:15:00 UTC by Own Oh ♦23 |
| 171310094 (Comments: 3) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 40) | Zurückgesetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173218723 Danke für dein Verständnis! commented 2025-10-13 10:11:22 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦263 |
| 173215844 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 153) | Fixed in changeset 173218187 openstreetmap.org/changeset/173218187 commented 2025-10-13 09:57:51 UTC by TinPetreković ♦170 |
| 173217955 (Comments: 1) | مرکز تخصصی زیبایی دکتر هما شریفی (Discussed changesets: 1) | خیلی صبور تو مشاوره دادن و دلسوز هستین..مممنونم commented 2025-10-13 09:57:17 UTC by Arezoo momtaz ♦1 |
| 173218105 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 390) | Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4999141 erledigt, die im Changeset-Kommentar erwähnte Notiz ist hier ein copy-paste-Fehler... commented 2025-10-13 09:57:02 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 173130886 (Comments: 1) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 24) | Pousuwaj bzdurne cudzysłowy z nazw osiedli. Być może coś zrobiłeś dobrze, więc nie chcę wycofywać całego zestawu zmian. commented 2025-10-13 09:52:21 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
| 173216250 (Comments: 1) | Reporter80 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Reporter, Better create separate nodes. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-10-13 09:48:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173157200 (Comments: 2) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 24) | Z Osiedlem Na Wzgórzach tak samo. commented 2025-10-13 09:47:47 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
| 173217081 (Comments: 1) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola jorafa051194, bienvenido y gracias por tu contribución. Para facilitar la colaboración y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que realizaste. Los co... commented 2025-10-13 09:46:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 173190909 (Comments: 1) | bzzzkrk (Discussed changesets: 24) | W tym zestawie zmian usunąłeś istniejące wiaty przystankowe. Nie pierwszy raz usuwasz istniejące obiekty. Wycofałem. commented 2025-10-13 09:44:21 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
 | 170120284 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 10) | Od 2010 r. polską nazwą miasta jest Iwano-Frankiwsk: https://www.gov.pl/web/ksng/55-posiedzenie-komisji-standaryzacji-nazw-geograficznych-poza-granicami-rp Nie wiem jak się ma zmiana nazwy w `name:pl` na Stanisławów (która... commented 2025-10-13 09:25:10 UTC by dzamper ♦152 |
| 173176180 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hallo Jasper, Ik zie dat jij hier een object dat je zelf hebt toegevoegd verwijderd en hebt vervangen door een nieuw object met identieke tags. Ik zie ook dat je dit meerdere keren hebt gedaan. Wat is hier de reden voor? Welke bronn... commented 2025-10-13 09:25:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172428490 (Comments: 5) | SWN-MP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, nachdem ich nun aus dem Urlaub zurück bin, melde mich mal wieder. Die Daten werden nur ein Mal die Woche (Donnerstag auf Freitag) übernommen. Dies wird mit der recht großen Datenmenge begründet (denke, das ist nachvo... commented 2025-10-13 09:24:37 UTC by SWN-MP ♦1 |
| 172929255 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Większość zmian tego użytkownika jest do wycofania, nanosi bzdury, a na komentarze nie odpowiada. commented 2025-10-13 09:22:27 UTC by uprkos ♦55 |
| 172933507 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Dodajesz nazwy ulic do dróg na terenie myjni??? commented 2025-10-13 09:21:19 UTC by uprkos ♦55 |
| 173145345 (Comments: 1) | rubynator (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Your changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 09:19:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,588 |
| 171212161 (Comments: 1) | Adventurize (Discussed changesets: 3) | 你编辑的毛病很多。为什么要这么画？ commented 2025-10-13 09:18:52 UTC by Taksine ♦112 |
| 130085542 (Comments: 1) | knoerk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Your changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 09:18:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,588 |
| 173146501 (Comments: 1) | knoerk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Your changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 09:18:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,588 |
 | 173202439 (Comments: 1) | Tasmanian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Its best practice to "square the building" using the Q key in the ID editor. There is also brillian imagery here so please take the time to get the best outline that matches the building. commented 2025-10-13 09:17:40 UTC by tastrax ♦1,161 |
| 172646453 (Comments: 4) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | No, ja czytałem dokumentację odnośnie pasów skrętu i tak jak pisałeś jest prawidłowo, więc poprawiłem commented 2025-10-13 09:16:26 UTC by Feskil ♦26 |
| 173114636 (Comments: 2) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | Noo, właśnie nie wiedziałem czy traktować to jako rampę, czy jeszcze jako ulicę. Czy pas do skrętu nie liczy się jako druga jezdnia? commented 2025-10-13 09:15:12 UTC by Feskil ♦26 |
| 164466484 (Comments: 4) | Janeczek4567 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Także w EMUiA granica między Chróściną a Starym Grodkowem przebiega na północ od Osiedla Zacisze. Janeczek4567 nie odpowiada. Biorę się za poprawianie. commented 2025-10-13 09:15:09 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦398 |
| 172706492 (Comments: 4) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 66) | Też jest B-1 prywatne postawiony commented 2025-10-13 09:14:03 UTC by Feskil ♦26 |
| 173213254 (Comments: 3) | Johan3822 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem... commented 2025-10-13 08:47:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173209929 (Comments: 3) | DeTimster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke... Bedankt voor je 'reply'. De tagging is van een ervaren mapper. Het is eigenlijk de Duitse manier van fietspaden taggen. Daar gelden andere regels, want op een cycleway mag je niet wandelen en ook niet paardrijden. bicycl... commented 2025-10-13 08:44:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173211601 (Comments: 1) | kasa kai (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167924592 commented 2025-10-13 08:43:11 UTC by kasa kai ♦25 |
| 167924592 (Comments: 1) | KUNGFUPAND (Discussed changesets: 4) | Changes modified and fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173211601 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173211521 commented 2025-10-13 08:41:39 UTC by kasa kai ♦25 |
| 167924783 (Comments: 1) | KUNGFUPAND (Discussed changesets: 4) | Changes modified and fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173213391 commented 2025-10-13 08:40:44 UTC by kasa kai ♦25 |
| 167925127 (Comments: 1) | KUNGFUPAND (Discussed changesets: 4) | Changes modified and fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173213908 commented 2025-10-13 08:40:01 UTC by kasa kai ♦25 |
| 173213908 (Comments: 1) | kasa kai (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167925127 commented 2025-10-13 08:39:35 UTC by kasa kai ♦25 |
| 173213391 (Comments: 1) | kasa kai (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167924783 commented 2025-10-13 08:39:04 UTC by kasa kai ♦25 |
| 173211521 (Comments: 1) | kasa kai (Discussed changesets: 10) | Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173211521 commented 2025-10-13 08:38:21 UTC by kasa kai ♦25 |
| 172483580 (Comments: 2) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 303) | W materiałach na stronie kontraktu jest taka nazwa, np. tu: https://s7plonsk-czosnow.pl/galeria/zdjecia-z-ziemi-o2.html commented 2025-10-13 08:37:34 UTC by szalona_entropia ♦293 |
| 173197754 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hoi, review_requested \tyes De foutmelding is hier sports_centre in sports_centre. Meestal negeer ik het. Soms kan het niet anders. Een 'validator' wil wel altijd de sport zien. Zijn er meer sporten dan kun je sport=... commented 2025-10-13 08:35:02 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173007799 (Comments: 4) | Seetroll (Discussed changesets: 42) | The countryname is automaticly generated, therefore it is not necessary to add tags to nodes/waypoints. Can you revert these changes please? commented 2025-10-13 08:29:12 UTC by borishag ♦156 |
| 173129137 (Comments: 1) | Kamirol (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cześć, obszarom (osiedlom) takich domków nie dajemy nazw. Tym bardziej, że ta nazwa osiedla wynika raczej z nazwy ulicy, przy której domki zostały wybudowane a nie z tablicy z nazwą przy wjeździe na osiedle (wtedy bardziej pasuje ... commented 2025-10-13 08:26:27 UTC by Marek-M ♦942 |
| 173113838 (Comments: 1) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 52) | Kleiner Hinweis bezüglich URLs: Du hast hier das www entfernt. Die Website leitet aber auf www.dieci.ch weiter. URLs in OpenStreetMap sollten möglichst direkt und ohne Weiterleitungen sein. Insofern war die vorherige Version korrekt. commented 2025-10-13 08:24:37 UTC by Lezurex ♦227 |
| 173172511 (Comments: 1) | Rollon14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Rollon14, Peux-tu préciser comment est fermé le bunker ? SC a mis l'accès en NoExit, ce qui n'est pas accepté par Osmose car il existe une continuité de chemins. D'avance merci :... commented 2025-10-13 08:16:59 UTC by ZekOwney ♦20 |
 | 167198139 (Comments: 1) | natalia2005 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hola. no había revisado antes tu contribución. cuidado con la etiqueta 'name'. esta es para los nombres propios de los objetos, no para descripciones. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres commented 2025-10-13 08:13:23 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,903 |
| 173116628 (Comments: 1) | natalia2005 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hola y bienvenida a OSM. de qué se trata, este edificio? tiene una función que puedas explicar, así que lo ponemos correctamente en la base de datos. voy a mejorar su geometría. commented 2025-10-13 08:10:47 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,903 |
| 171512013 (Comments: 1) | qrisztly (Discussed changesets: 7) | Har slettet navn på cykelreparationsstation. Feltet er ikke til generiske beskrivelser. commented 2025-10-13 08:10:01 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦104 |
| 173185261 (Comments: 3) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173213064 commented 2025-10-13 08:01:33 UTC by Fraxi ♦154 |
| 173154189 (Comments: 1) | Simone_ilpollo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao Simone, I nome del strads tra I fonte e sul segna... https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/16/16tozw31jxb2sdwpmoy0z622v5id5pcjl-p637526392-full/1991fc3b5ae?width=3072&height=2304&crop=false&q=70 Buona Mappatura commented 2025-10-13 07:54:59 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,448 |
| 172610704 (Comments: 2) | Siamor1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank je wel ik zal hem doornemen commented 2025-10-13 07:49:21 UTC by Siamor1 ♦1 |
| 173113438 (Comments: 1) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 119) | Thanks for the fix! commented 2025-10-13 07:48:22 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,260 |
| 173184995 (Comments: 2) | Martijn14 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-13 07:40:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173141355 (Comments: 1) | _pkal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je geeft aan dat er bij Scheidemakershof Kasseien liggen, Sett zie ook wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=sett?uselang=nl . Op deze locatie liggen geen kasseien maar BKK straatstenen, ik heb dit veranderd . Graag opletten bij een... commented 2025-10-13 07:38:47 UTC by jaap de vries ♦666 |
| 173174945 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | I love free software but since anyone can just vandalize some of it, I rather support big tech in some cases. Thanks. commented 2025-10-13 07:37:45 UTC by Anonymous36863 ♦3 |
| 173201446 (Comments: 1) | Johan3822 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-13 07:20:33 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173210449 (Comments: 1) | X_223- (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi X_223-, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 building(s) Could you please confirm if these... commented 2025-10-13 07:03:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 171799189 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | I checked the history of the changed way, and it turns out that the street _does_ have a bus bay, and I used aerial imagery to determine which side(s) of it the bus bay is on. commented 2025-10-13 07:02:41 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
 | 172994505 (Comments: 3) | AndySchulte (Discussed changesets: 116) | I have corrected that, thank you for pointing it out. commented 2025-10-13 07:01:05 UTC by AndySchulte ♦102 |
| 172836422 (Comments: 2) | Viima (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Your assumption is correct. Henceforth, I am going to use the "destination:display" key. Thank you for the suggestion. commented 2025-10-13 07:00:11 UTC by Viima ♦19 |
| 172543641 (Comments: 8) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Prinzipiell halte ich die Nutzung von ref:DE-RP in Analogie zu anderen Bundesländern für richtig und gut. Dass weitere Unterteilungen ebenfalls mit einem : abgegrenzt werden, ist leider tatsächlich Usus, wem auch immer wir das zu verda... commented 2025-10-13 06:54:57 UTC by limes11 ♦953 |
| 173205909 (Comments: 1) | Kevin_07-18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. These descriptions (and maybe more?) look like they are copied from Google. Please don't do that in the future - it's not compatible with OSM's license. Read more here: https://w... commented 2025-10-13 06:51:51 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 172924602 (Comments: 3) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Allora si reverta e basta? commented 2025-10-13 06:51:49 UTC by George Sears ♦70 |
| 173099035 (Comments: 2) | Gicorada (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, using Level0 I didn't realize the geographical size, my changesets usually are local commented 2025-10-13 06:49:38 UTC by Gicorada ♦5 |
| 173206191 (Comments: 1) | rubiniums (Discussed changesets: 5) | Way 128610567: Statt name=455 wäre ref=455 korrekt. commented 2025-10-13 06:48:02 UTC by martinst ♦333 |
| 172999682 (Comments: 6) | nona mostafa (Discussed changesets: 33) | Ok thanks commented 2025-10-13 06:35:53 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 173203382 (Comments: 1) | Onekinnygee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I must reverted your changeset, because the camera isn't on the street (it is left or right from the street) Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance for a better description of your object. commented 2025-10-13 06:31:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173200451 (Comments: 2) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Poprawiłem te kilka adresów. W jaki sposób można sprawdzić czy przed zatwierdzeniem zmian nie popełniło się jakichś błędów? commented 2025-10-13 06:19:25 UTC by Multidragon ♦1 |
| 171966055 (Comments: 1) | PaulB2412 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo PaulB2412, herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Ich wollte Dir den Hinweis geben, dass Du hier einen Rewe-Supermarkt neu hinzugefügt hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/no... commented 2025-10-13 06:03:09 UTC by hfs ♦67 |
| 173026882 (Comments: 22) | 쥰쥰쥰 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 앞서 말했듯 하늘에 떠있는 수많은 인공위성들의 위성 사진들은 검열 처리도 없이 상업적으로 잘만 판매되고 있는 상황이라 지도 하나 잡아봐야 어떻게 되지도 않습니다. 현실적으로 공개... commented 2025-10-13 06:02:40 UTC by rhtb0 ♦253 |
| 173208828 (Comments: 1) | Johnbeal_00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-13 06:00:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 173207728 (Comments: 1) | opDavi1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1348096768. What is the mean of the tag guest_house=guest_house? (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:guest_house). commented 2025-10-13 05:43:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173208493 (Comments: 1) | 2moflovect (Discussed changesets: 1) | Почему их видно на определенном масштабе? Что нужно исправить? commented 2025-10-13 05:43:03 UTC by 2moflovect ♦1 |
| 173145695 (Comments: 3) | maferikotupi (Discussed changesets: 46) | dommage de supprimer direct!!!! commented 2025-10-13 05:41:20 UTC by maferikotupi ♦33 |
| 173145696 (Comments: 2) | maferikotupi (Discussed changesets: 46) | je décale, c'est à côté commented 2025-10-13 05:40:05 UTC by maferikotupi ♦33 |
 | 173117284 (Comments: 3) | Magick93 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Short answer: Did you know https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm? commented 2025-10-13 05:24:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 154640056 (Comments: 2) | artos42 (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304799852/history - a tych? commented 2025-10-13 05:23:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 154607965 (Comments: 1) | artos42 (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304654266/history - czy są jakiekolwiek pozostałości w terenie tego obiektu? commented 2025-10-13 05:23:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 173194940 (Comments: 1) | Jackie Webb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.. The AED is positioned within the garage outline. Which looks like it's not accessible to the public, as access+yes implies? Can you please correct your map position and tags to something logical? If not then... commented 2025-10-13 05:14:04 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,938 |
| 173205770 (Comments: 3) | 쥰쥰쥰 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 꼭 GPS를 기반으로만 편집하지 않습니다. gps는 보조 수단일 뿐입니다. commented 2025-10-13 05:06:48 UTC by rhtb0 ♦253 |
| 173204152 (Comments: 1) | 쥰쥰쥰 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 버스정류장 명칭은 지울 필요가 없어 보입니다. commented 2025-10-13 04:57:57 UTC by rhtb0 ♦253 |
| 158572761 (Comments: 1) | junyeah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Jun, I removed the ford tags, that were probably added by mistake. Cheers, Totor commented 2025-10-13 04:36:19 UTC by Totor ♦67 |
| 173199895 (Comments: 1) | stevethomp (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted this and several other changes on this course over the last 24 hours that violate rule #1 of golf course mapping: golf course areas (fairways, greens, roughs, tees, etc) should not intersect each other. The previous versions of these holes w... commented 2025-10-13 04:30:03 UTC by b-jazz ♦734 |
| 173146045 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 425) | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:My_little_brother_did_it commented 2025-10-13 04:07:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 173026089 (Comments: 1) | Hans Thompson (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, the last change has made the building disappear from the map rendering. You might consider adding tags like building=hotel or tourism=hotel to see which will make it reappear. commented 2025-10-13 03:44:45 UTC by kevinp2 ♦21 |
| 173200752 (Comments: 1) | unyny (Discussed changesets: 521) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441722332<... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173200011 (Comments: 1) | Soczek2752 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173197608 (Comments: 1) | Mechowskyy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173204072 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 124) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2411952763 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:42 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173200263 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173200459 (Comments: 1) | Endres Pelka (Discussed changesets: 52) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256522636... commented 2025-10-13 03:42:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172815608 (Comments: 1) | 130597 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is it a real place? commented 2025-10-13 03:07:50 UTC by warudo ♦1 |
| 173182273 (Comments: 1) | Henk Sufitrail (Discussed changesets: 1) | You changed the leisure=nature_reserve tag to natural=water tag. You flooded some parts of the city. :) I have reverted your incorrect changes. And please briefly describe what you did in your changeset comments. See: https://wiki.openstreetm... commented 2025-10-13 02:49:47 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172232293 (Comments: 1) | S-zation (Discussed changesets: 31) | If you are adding these as a result of notes, please close the notes. commented 2025-10-13 02:43:50 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,061 |
| 173204580 (Comments: 1) | David clv crro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi David clv crro, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your ... commented 2025-10-13 02:18:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172467360 (Comments: 1) | RiiRiee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please, what is the meaning of these dense grids of footways and service roads? For example, here, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334960642 the ways you have added bear no resemblance to reality. It seems like you are adding these ways for some k... commented 2025-10-13 01:18:49 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦93 |
| 173156009 (Comments: 5) | wadenick (Discussed changesets: 5) | OK I _think_ I might have corrected the fairway / putting green relationship on hole 1 here. Would you let me know if I've got it right? I'm mapping another local course and ready to get those relationships right. commented 2025-10-12 23:58:30 UTC by wadenick ♦5 |
| 173202735 (Comments: 1) | wadenick (Discussed changesets: 5) | Paging @b-jazz ... I tried relationships on these four holes on a new course mapping mission here. I'm going to stop now until I hear if I've got the details right or not. commented 2025-10-12 23:50:10 UTC by wadenick ♦5 |
| 172628252 (Comments: 2) | deryağ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cevap yazmadığınız için değişikliğinizi geri aldım. Değişikliğiniz deneme amaçlı değil gerçek ise buradan cevap yazarak belirtebilirsiniz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202742 commented 2025-10-12 23:46:10 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172946958 (Comments: 2) | Antoine Feike (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202346 commented 2025-10-12 23:16:26 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦263 |
| 171505714 (Comments: 5) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 61) | Dzięki commented 2025-10-12 23:12:04 UTC by czebureks ♦118 |
| 173191199 (Comments: 1) | doğatekinnn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Farklı nesneleri(bazı binaları, bir mahalle etiketini, bir çeşmeyi) silmişsiniz. Değişikliğinizi gerçeğe aykırı olduğu için geri aldım. Bilginize. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202297 commented 2025-10-12 23:11:33 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
 | 151615430 (Comments: 1) | ljubop (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! It seems to me you have used "name" tags incorrectly in this change. This cemetery does not actually has a name. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things (section ... commented 2025-10-12 23:05:55 UTC by Self-Perfection ♦168 |
| 173169446 (Comments: 2) | leDespicable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202141 commented 2025-10-12 23:00:06 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦263 |
| 173167832 (Comments: 1) | X_223- (Discussed changesets: 5) | 节点“陈梓强刷新点”(13227328734)如何为旅游景点？ commented 2025-10-12 22:57:28 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦13 |
| 173197797 (Comments: 3) | Sim8081 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah okay, das macht das ganze natürlich noch einfacher. Danke. commented 2025-10-12 22:39:35 UTC by Sim8081 ♦1 |
| 165755768 (Comments: 2) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hi domiden, Was bedeutet die Quelle "Bayern ALKIS" in diesem changeset und diversen anderen? Die ALKIS Parzellarkarte ist nicht mit OSM kompatibel, und die anderen OpenData Angebote der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung sind es *n... commented 2025-10-12 22:31:53 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦263 |
| 165762014 (Comments: 1) | domiden (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hallo domiden, du hast hier Gemarkungsgrenzen eingetragen, und dabei die Quelle Bayern ALKIS Verwaltungsgrenzen benutzt. Leider dürfen wir die OpenData Produkte aus Bayern momentan noch nicht verwenden. Dazu gibt es einen langen T... commented 2025-10-12 22:19:49 UTC by daganzdaanda ♦263 |
| 173170015 (Comments: 2) | Quasimodo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Bienson, und sogar von dir dankenswerterweise wieder angepasst. Ich war mir tatsächlich nicht ganz sicher bei der Aktion und habe wieder was gelernt. Danke! commented 2025-10-12 22:11:58 UTC by Quasimodo ♦4 |
| 172903200 (Comments: 3) | tagishsimon (Discussed changesets: 8) | "There should be only one railway=station element for each station (refer to One feature, one OSM element)". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26479890 https://dat... commented 2025-10-12 22:08:47 UTC by DaveF ♦1,586 |
| 173183335 (Comments: 1) | Paul Lundwall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines commented 2025-10-12 22:08:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 171481897 (Comments: 1) | Magar Sushma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines commented 2025-10-12 22:07:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173044016 (Comments: 3) | okainov (Discussed changesets: 4) | @okainov With all due respect, limiting it to “some part of Europe” is still far too broad. commented 2025-10-12 22:06:32 UTC by Ansofter ♦2 |
| 173177936 (Comments: 1) | LeoDelCarto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines commented 2025-10-12 22:06:23 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 172454690 (Comments: 1) | Andreea Tulvan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines commented 2025-10-12 22:04:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173200269 (Comments: 1) | gigi91 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also highway=cycleway ist nicht korrekt, da kein ausschließlicher Fahrradweg. Vom Süden bis https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9169908507 ist es definitv ein highway=service, da Zufahrtsweg zu den Garagen https://www.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-10-12 21:57:26 UTC by Bienson ♦327 |
| 168032329 (Comments: 2) | QuigleyJones (Discussed changesets: 15) | preconstruction, slated for demolition commented 2025-10-12 21:46:36 UTC by QuigleyJones ♦7 |
| 173164592 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please stop adding national roads (network=GR:national) that do not exist: the list of national roads are at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/National_Roads. The ring road relation that you added is not a national road, so I had to remove i... commented 2025-10-12 21:44:44 UTC by ika-chan! ♦288 |
| 171303988 (Comments: 3) | kalot47 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Estos edificios están abiertos, lo que pasa que sin mucha actividad. Efectivamente pertenecen a la Generalitat Valenciana, pero esto no se debería reflejar en el "name". Más info: https://www.lavanguardia.com/loc... commented 2025-10-12 21:36:40 UTC by dmlls ♦10 |
| 171353245 (Comments: 2) | Almorca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Toda la razón. commented 2025-10-12 21:24:04 UTC by Almorca ♦9 |
| 143690544 (Comments: 1) | happymapper (Discussed changesets: 27) | I'd definitely suggest adding "designation=core_path" where relevant, as per https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/designation=core_path . commented 2025-10-12 21:22:34 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 171303833 (Comments: 1) | kalot47 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi @kalot47, did you perhaps delete this node accidentally? The "Fundación ELLIS Alicante" still exists and is located where the node was. commented 2025-10-12 21:18:17 UTC by dmlls ♦10 |
| 173198935 (Comments: 2) | Cybermanx (Discussed changesets: 4) | revert at https://osm.org/changeset/173200089 commented 2025-10-12 21:14:23 UTC by Cybermanx ♦7 |
 | 173094936 (Comments: 3) | Kraan46 (Discussed changesets: 21) | I mapped the footprint smaller than the roof, becasue the roof has a unique shape. I though this was due to it overhanging the walls. Perhaps you saw or considered something I had not. I placed the POI between the two groups of buildings I thi... commented 2025-10-12 21:08:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173139696 (Comments: 7) | Vl-Sher (Discussed changesets: 7) | И трек выложу, и тропу по нему нарисую. commented 2025-10-12 20:59:18 UTC by Vl-Sher ♦5 |
| 173145707 (Comments: 3) | uYerh (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't know what are presets in Osmand but you can add a cafe [amenity=cafe] + [kids_area=yes] if this is mainly a cafe with kids area. And if it's mainly a playroom for children, then [leisure=indoor_play]. commented 2025-10-12 20:55:59 UTC by maro21 ♦739 |
| 173196470 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! Thank you for your contributions! Naming streets in Bulgarian, without "ул." or "street" and quotation marks is the usual practice. See:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%... commented 2025-10-12 20:53:35 UTC by Fraxi ♦154 |
| 162292619 (Comments: 1) | HappyMapper2020 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've reverted these changes. Being drivable does not mean it is legally allowed. Those ways had a source:motor_vehicle tag referencing a local law that establishes their correct value. This law is still in effect, so, driving on them is still fo... commented 2025-10-12 20:27:33 UTC by ftrebien ♦171 |
| 173131477 (Comments: 4) | mapitero (Discussed changesets: 6) | No OSM, nós sempre mapeamos as restrições legais, mesmo quando os moradores locais desrespeitam a lei. Em fevereiro, o HappyMapper2020 mudou motor_vehicle=no para motor_vehicle=yes sem mudar source:motor_vehicle, gerando confus&a... commented 2025-10-12 20:24:21 UTC by ftrebien ♦171 |
| 173125721 (Comments: 2) | Hervé TUC (Discussed changesets: 33) | Salut Oui je m'amuse, je ne sais plus combien il y en avait quand j'ai commencé, mais aujourd'hui il en reste un petit million dans toute la France. J'avance, j'avance... commented 2025-10-12 20:23:16 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦39 |
| 172942394 (Comments: 3) | MatzeTh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung. Gemeint ist mit fire_hydrant:diameter ausschließlich die Nennweite der Zuleitung. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-12 20:23:08 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 172165368 (Comments: 5) | Kraan46 (Discussed changesets: 21) | I like to explain the why, but I will try to be as brief as possible in future. I comment on changesets sometimes, becasue they are more specific than tasks. You yourself have commented on others' changesets. Not everyone contributes via ... commented 2025-10-12 20:21:57 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173114874 (Comments: 2) | CALMAMED (Discussed changesets: 1) | Naprawione commented 2025-10-12 20:19:07 UTC by bartgron ♦268 |
 | 173198093 (Comments: 1) | Skywolf333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I also, merge the same village points together because they are referring to the same village with the name in Chinese or the name in Burese. Also, applied the location of the same village in Burese because they located in Myanmar. commented 2025-10-12 20:15:12 UTC by Skywolf333 ♦1 |
| 173160607 (Comments: 2) | davejruk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: Not sure what imagery you used, but ESRI World Imagery is the most current and shows both buildings. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA ... commented 2025-10-12 20:06:07 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 171390879 (Comments: 1) | מבני הנביאים (Discussed changesets: 3) | תודה על כל התוספות בישראל מסמנים שמורת טבע עם \t boundary=protected_area ואין צורך להוסיף leisure commented 2025-10-12 20:06:06 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
 | 173192752 (Comments: 1) | DanieScarb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-12 19:46:21 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173194526 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-12 19:45:21 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173194087 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-12 19:45:05 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 172858683 (Comments: 3) | sandstorm (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4998830 mentions that there's no building being built on the western part. What do you make of this? commented 2025-10-12 19:31:06 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 173195654 (Comments: 1) | Bąbel (Discussed changesets: 268) | Pytam po raz kolejny - dlaczego zdublowałeś adres Skalskiego 13? commented 2025-10-12 19:24:51 UTC by Szymson ♦408 |
| 173186082 (Comments: 1) | 3D打印 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 3D打印, you are continuing to add Chinese script names in Indian-administered territory. Please use only name:zh fields for Chinese script. Thank you. commented 2025-10-12 19:23:22 UTC by Kautilya3 ♦40 |
 | 173179881 (Comments: 1) | Stef-Cris (Discussed changesets: 4) | Salut. Pe langa ca nu pui comentariii la ce editezi pe harta si trebuie sa ne uitam ce faci, cu ce drept pui tu informatii despre adresa unui actor / personaj pubilc pe harta? I-ai cerut macar acordul? Asa ceva nu se pune pe nicio harta publica. Este... commented 2025-10-12 19:22:50 UTC by rarad74 ♦298 |
| 173187036 (Comments: 6) | schoka (Discussed changesets: 17) | Das ist alles uneinheitlich, siehe auch im deutschen Wiki: "Für eine Gemeinschaftseinrichtung für lokale Feste und Events, wird stattdessen amenity=community_centre verwendet." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:clu... commented 2025-10-12 19:19:08 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 172878933 (Comments: 1) | Pfad-Finder (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ścieżką, którą usunąłeś (obecnie to linia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435710951) jeszcze 2 lata temu biegł szlak nordic walking, zdjęcie: https://mapa-turystyczna.pl/photo/133784/nearby zrobione w miejscu 52.3028014, 15.2680194... commented 2025-10-12 19:14:44 UTC by englu ♦192 |
 | 172856226 (Comments: 5) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 53) | The Geoportal is not accurate for Velebit in some cases. HGSS maps are the latest verified and published mountain maps in Croatia. Zoranićev vrh is the correct name; West Babin vrh is to the north. The HGSS map is the correct one in this case. |
| 173195065 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-12 18:51:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172964672 (Comments: 1) | LukeDH (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ciao. I nomi delle cascine vanno nel tag place, e non sugli edifici. Ciao, Andrea --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172964672 commented 2025-10-12 18:49:03 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,456 |
| 173177030 (Comments: 2) | DenisKachinskiy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks I will update it commented 2025-10-12 18:46:56 UTC by DenisKachinskiy ♦1 |
| 173194101 (Comments: 2) | mtekla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, du som vet får gärna tagga om den. commented 2025-10-12 18:27:02 UTC by mtekla ♦2 |
| 173160886 (Comments: 1) | Fan7787 (Discussed changesets: 22) | I removed the La Pryor Bypass because I can't find any evidence of it existing. commented 2025-10-12 18:23:55 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 171559559 (Comments: 1) | seering4 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Moin, ist der Weg an der Kupfermühle vorbei tatsächlich zugangsbeschränkt? Hier führt die Wanderroute 16 der Aktivregion Alsterland vorbei. Wie kommen die Gäste zum Restaurant? Besten Dank für eine Antwort. ;-) commented 2025-10-12 18:20:47 UTC by wachsihh ♦1 |
| 167737692 (Comments: 2) | mystery2008 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Здравствуйте, нет конечно, я использовал этот тег, тк видел уже на карте такое обозначение схожей линии U в где-то в Карелии, и потому что э... commented 2025-10-12 18:10:48 UTC by mystery2008 ♦12 |
| 173168290 (Comments: 1) | NUR7813 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lütfen bir daha bu şekilde toplu silme işlemi yapmayın. Toplu düzenleme ve silme işlemleriyle ilgili kuralları buradan inceleyebilirsiniz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice commented 2025-10-12 17:42:14 UTC by TheGreenOne ♦6 |
| 158731856 (Comments: 1) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 19) | Mathias, bizarrement y a deux notes qui demandent à faire le changement de sens de circulation en 8/2025. Je vois que tu avais fait le changement en 2024. Geovelo était forcément mi... commented 2025-10-12 17:32:06 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦18 |
| 173164389 (Comments: 1) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | again, likely not a real living street. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173164389 commented 2025-10-12 17:27:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173164417 (Comments: 2) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | While Washington State does have regulations in place for what could be living streets, this is not likely one. Please read the wiki on what a living street is and isn't. --- Published using OSMCha: ... commented 2025-10-12 17:26:04 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173163856 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 11) | These aren't highway=service because they aren't for vehicle access, you can see the bollards and curbs on streetside. commented 2025-10-12 17:25:39 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 173098092 (Comments: 1) | Lukas48 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Ich habe einige Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen. ref und fire_hydrant:diameter In das Feld „ref“ kommt die Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewiesen ist. Die Zahl nach dem „H“ i... commented 2025-10-12 17:18:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
 | 172587746 (Comments: 3) | EddyMoi56d74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola EddyMoi56d74. Muchas gracias por tu respuesta. Te comparto un enlace a la wiki de OpenStreetMap que documenta el uso correcto de las etiquetas que has modificado: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:population |
| 173191995 (Comments: 1) | Dogtopia of South Lafayette (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-12 17:12:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 28112915 (Comments: 1) | Suerlaenner (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bei Ramsbek ist der Bach den du als Eltmecke eingetragen hast in den offiziellen Karten Nord-Rhein-Westfahlens als Hannabecke eingetragen bis eben die Hannabecke mit der Eltmecke zusammenfließt. Hast du oben mit Eltmecke begonnen und bei dem Z... commented 2025-10-12 17:12:27 UTC by Kersti Nebelsiek ♦9 |
| 173158778 (Comments: 1) | Tex2002ans (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, some buildings got a strange 'Unit' tag. Could you check that? commented 2025-10-12 17:11:41 UTC by mueschel ♦6,681 |
| 173171405 (Comments: 2) | EugeniyKH (Discussed changesets: 17) | Вижу, уже поменяли. Только часть там узковата, не пролезет авто commented 2025-10-12 17:11:13 UTC by EugeniyKH ♦13 |
| 173191943 (Comments: 1) | cielak42 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Szczegóły geometrii muszą poczekać na nowe zdjęcia lotnicze. commented 2025-10-12 17:08:54 UTC by cielak42 ♦26 |
| 173092165 (Comments: 2) | Kersti Nebelsiek (Discussed changesets: 9) | Der andere Name war auch in der Karte zu sehen, aber eben nur bis Etmecke und Hannabecke zusammengeflossen sind, dann steht zumindest in den offiziellen Karten die Hannabecke als Name. Ich hatte vermutet, daß da jemand oben an der Etmec... commented 2025-10-12 16:58:44 UTC by Kersti Nebelsiek ♦9 |
| 173184639 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 27) | Trzeba naprawdę być smutnym człowiekiem, żeby psuć dane OSM, zamiast zapytać społeczność, jak można rozwiązać problem w swojej aplikacji... commented 2025-10-12 16:50:27 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,148 |
| 53384781 (Comments: 1) | FreedSky (Discussed changesets: 58) | Freedsky, it has been a long time, but I am not sure where this border line is coming from. I think the border of Tsosib Sumgyil should be the same as that of China-India border here. Do you disagree? commented 2025-10-12 16:15:54 UTC by Kautilya3 ♦40 |
| 173130829 (Comments: 1) | f4phantom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merhaba. node/2071263560'un man_made=monitoring_station etiketini aeroway=aerodrome olarak değiştirmişsiniz. Hem havaalanı zaten mevcut(way/183771833) ve alanda aeroway=aerodrome etiketi bulunuyor. Hem de bir hava durumu istasyonu düğ&... commented 2025-10-12 16:11:42 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173101537 (Comments: 2) | seewäldler (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo! Ja, das fand ich auch komisch, aber das Feld ist so wie die anderen Häfler Spielplätze ausgeschildert. Ich glaube die Stadt hat da die gleichen Schilder für alles vom Sandkasten bis zum fussbaldfeldgrossen Bolzplatz für... commented 2025-10-12 15:55:02 UTC by seewäldler ♦174 |
| 173169930 (Comments: 1) | Jens Adamskie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, hierzu eine Anmerkung: In den Namen sollen allgemein bekannte Namen. Der Teil „12-40“ gehört nicht dazu. Nummern von Einheiten, Bestandteile von Funkrufkennungen etc. sollten in „ref“ aufgenommen werden. ... commented 2025-10-12 15:50:27 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 173167682 (Comments: 1) | Jens Adamskie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich habe einige Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen. ref und fire_hydrant:diameter In das Feld „ref“ kommt die Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewie... commented 2025-10-12 15:47:02 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 173185351 (Comments: 1) | earthpassenger01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi earthpassenger01, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow you... commented 2025-10-12 15:06:51 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 173143276 (Comments: 7) | hossader (Discussed changesets: 3) | fajne linki, dzięki! commented 2025-10-12 15:02:40 UTC by MaciekMma ♦68 |
| 173150053 (Comments: 1) | YourLocalEnbyMapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | There seems to be an issue with the changeset, as I never intended to edit anything in the top part of it commented 2025-10-12 15:00:21 UTC by YourLocalEnbyMapper ♦1 |
| 172032966 (Comments: 13) | pat-lachute (Discussed changesets: 12) | @pat-lachute, Valhalla will be able to support this precision in a bit. Still, it'd be best if you edit those ways to be described by a handful of nodes. You can have a look at some roundabouts, they often only have the intersection nodes, so it... commented 2025-10-12 14:53:43 UTC by Nils Nolde ♦2 |
 | 173178950 (Comments: 1) | Alexei-1984 (Discussed changesets: 6) | fixed or reverted many of the changes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173184789 commented 2025-10-12 14:44:37 UTC by yelisey90 ♦175 |
| 173183996 (Comments: 1) | frackture (Discussed changesets: 1) | merci de respecter les terrains privés pour toute question n'hésitez pas à me contacter par mail gardeanimaux83@gmail.com commented 2025-10-12 14:34:17 UTC by frackture ♦1 |
| 172957380 (Comments: 1) | Nivseg (Discussed changesets: 1) | שלום, יש פה חסימה להולכי רגל או שזו טעות? commented 2025-10-12 14:29:59 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
| 172449812 (Comments: 1) | Andreea Tulvan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for mapping. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. However, you incorrectly tagged a few buildings with a layer=-1. Layer is typically used when some things (like a bridge and a road) are on to... commented 2025-10-12 14:29:48 UTC by martien-176 ♦357 |
| 173130323 (Comments: 1) | f4phantom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merhaba. way/1411782047'de highway=construction duruyor, sadece construction=trunk etiketini silmişsiniz. Unuttunuz mu? Yoksa başka bir nedeni mi var? (Muhtemelen) way/90514110'i bölmüşsünüz. Fakat yolu bö... commented 2025-10-12 14:29:17 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173179770 (Comments: 1) | Finthus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-12 14:26:32 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173166802 (Comments: 4) | necator71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | That is beginners mistake from my part then, thank you for the instruction, and for removing duplicate roads commented 2025-10-12 14:21:29 UTC by necator71 ♦1 |
| 172446338 (Comments: 3) | NyxxHD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ergebnis der Diskussion im Forum: * BS Energy will sich den Gleisanschluss als mögliche Option für zukünftige Lieferungen von Brennmaterial zum HKW offenhalten. * Wenn es Hinweise gibt, dass da zumindest einmal jährlich ein... commented 2025-10-12 14:07:58 UTC by rohieb ♦115 |
| 173172940 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 27) | Dlaczego wciąż próbujesz to błędnie zmieniać? Zrozum, że jeśli masz jakąś swoją aplikację, to w niej musisz to obsłużyć, a nie psuć dane OSM. commented 2025-10-12 13:30:02 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,148 |
| 171349996 (Comments: 1) | Rove (Discussed changesets: 12) | Salve, ho notato che in questo gruppo di modifiche hai eliminato tutto un sentiero che parte dal Pian della Pecora e arriva al Passo Caldenno. Questo sentiero è stato creato con una ruspa circa 1 anno fa soprattutto per le Mountain bike ed &e... commented 2025-10-12 13:27:28 UTC by Aaaa002 ♦2 |
| 173166114 (Comments: 1) | nona mostafa (Discussed changesets: 33) | Your changes were reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173172484 commented 2025-10-12 13:23:22 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 173172484 (Comments: 1) | Younes_Agadir (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't get into an edit war with nona mostafa, the interchange is still into construction, so please stop removing the contruction tags. This video was published yesterday, and they're far from being done. https://www.youtube.com/w... commented 2025-10-12 13:22:52 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 171325043 (Comments: 1) | danielza (Discussed changesets: 7) | שלום דניאל רצתי שם לפני כמה ימים וראיתי שהסינגל הוא תערובת של סינגל פיראטי, דרכי עפר ועקבות מטושטשים של אופניים. לא שביל מסודר ולדעתי ... commented 2025-10-12 13:15:48 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
| 173093239 (Comments: 1) | dav23r (Discussed changesets: 3) | duplicates? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13206789403 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13206789402 commented 2025-10-12 13:15:19 UTC by yelisey90 ♦175 |
| 173130551 (Comments: 3) | Misiek_G (Discussed changesets: 29) | Mam dobrą wiadomość dla Ciebie. Poprzednia ta większa zmiana nie będzie wycofana z mojej strony nawet częściowo. Następuje jakaś niezrozumiała dla mnie zmiana trendu pod tytułem olać historię. Nie rozumiem co się teraz... commented 2025-10-12 13:14:48 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦538 |
| 161256611 (Comments: 2) | 431c57 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Keine Ahnung. Scheint ein Fehler zu sein. Vllt. meinte isced.level? Dann wäre es aber „5“. Level=1 würde passen. Mausgerutscht im Drop-Down. Generell bin ich mir jetzt nach nochmaligem Nachlesen mit „amenity=c... commented 2025-10-12 13:06:47 UTC by 431c57 ♦17 |
| 173171501 (Comments: 1) | ladoga (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. In einer Relation hast du Straßen gleichen Namens zusammengefasst. Üblich ist dies für größere Straßen (Bundesstraße etc.) als &bdqu... commented 2025-10-12 13:03:47 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 173031276 (Comments: 2) | Mikko-Pentti Einari Eronen (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173031421 commented 2025-10-12 12:53:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173031587 (Comments: 3) | roberthcohenmd (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173033108 commented 2025-10-12 12:51:22 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173034274 (Comments: 2) | Shaun Kiernan: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173050068 commented 2025-10-12 12:51:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173176290 (Comments: 2) | 2938476529387 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dziękuję, zmiany zostały wprowadzone! commented 2025-10-12 12:50:38 UTC by 2938476529387 ♦1 |
 | 173037313 (Comments: 2) | Anh Ngữ BUD (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173179256 commented 2025-10-12 12:50:17 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173078652 (Comments: 2) | Youthful Images (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173093375 commented 2025-10-12 12:48:39 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173081450 (Comments: 2) | treeva01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173179074 commented 2025-10-12 12:48:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173085179 (Comments: 2) | pinkrabbitrestoration (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173095204 commented 2025-10-12 12:47:36 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173089834 (Comments: 2) | Ligaro Support (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173091377 commented 2025-10-12 12:46:38 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173103735 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Orlando - Apopka (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173111763 commented 2025-10-12 12:45:47 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173129184 (Comments: 2) | dogtopiaofstamford (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173178908 commented 2025-10-12 12:45:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173131257 (Comments: 2) | Anatoly Ripa (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173176304 commented 2025-10-12 12:44:36 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173173198 (Comments: 1) | Mario26mario (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-12 12:43:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| X | 173146962 (Comments: 2) | Juanin23 (Discussed changesets: 10) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178841 where the changeset comment is: Remove testdata commented 2025-10-12 12:43:51 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 173173103 (Comments: 1) | Mario26mario (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-12 12:43:50 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173146296 (Comments: 2) | Juanin23 (Discussed changesets: 10) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178820 where the changeset comment is: Remove testdata commented 2025-10-12 12:43:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| X | 173147147 (Comments: 2) | Juanin23 (Discussed changesets: 10) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178789 where the changeset comment is: Remove testdata commented 2025-10-12 12:43:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
 | 173171892 (Comments: 2) | Awara Rasool (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173178713 commented 2025-10-12 12:41:50 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173131054 (Comments: 1) | TheB1GLebowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1437089086. What is the mean of the tag Lowes Entrance @ 601 = Lowes Entrance @ 601 Lowes Entrance @ Rockford Street =\tLowes Entrance @ Rockford Street By the way: You draw ... commented 2025-10-12 12:41:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172778613 (Comments: 2) | Artarkserks (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178566 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 12:38:56 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 173177922 (Comments: 1) | JPJ&C (Discussed changesets: 4) | Info samengevoegd met adresnode commented 2025-10-12 12:37:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173178374 (Comments: 1) | JPJ&C (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag JP Probeer svp op de adresnodes bij te taggen, eggie commented 2025-10-12 12:36:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173166243 (Comments: 1) | MOTYANCHIK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от Яндекса на использование его карт в целях уточнения других карт (например... commented 2025-10-12 12:36:13 UTC by Grass-snake ♦243 |
| 173177599 (Comments: 1) | JPJ&C (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag JP Poi op gebouw geplaatst. Wat is het adres? commented 2025-10-12 12:35:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173177130 (Comments: 1) | Hashley G (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please start reading my messages and use the correct tags!!! commented 2025-10-12 12:34:13 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173168812 (Comments: 1) | Konrad95 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wycofałem tę zmianę, a następnie przesłałem prawidłową: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173176589 Przepraszam za zamieszanie commented 2025-10-12 12:20:59 UTC by Konrad95 ♦8 |
| 173176138 (Comments: 2) | MapChris3000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Waar je nu 28-3 hebt geplaatst zijn alle verdere nummers 26. Het adres op pand 12-3 heb ik hersteld commented 2025-10-12 12:15:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173116358 (Comments: 4) | hangy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wer denkt sich sowas aus für eine öffentliche Ladestation? Diese Stecker passen in eine Menge Geräte die bei 36 Volt einfach in Rauch aufgehen würden... Einen gängigen Namen kann ich nicht finden. Die beiden kleinen st... commented 2025-10-12 12:13:58 UTC by mueschel ♦6,681 |
 | 151247638 (Comments: 1) | Rolex06 (Discussed changesets: 4) | duplicated, already there https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4201921589 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151247638 commented 2025-10-12 12:11:54 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,504 |
| 167739249 (Comments: 3) | yaroslavrepin2013 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Этот пакет правок отменён. commented 2025-10-12 12:10:17 UTC by mavl ♦76,131 |
| 173176187 (Comments: 1) | MapChris3000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag MapChris Svp geen format van adressen veranderen. Het is import vanuit het Kadaster (BAG) en het werkt zoals het werkt in deze format. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-12 12:08:51 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
 | 173172218 (Comments: 1) | themi97 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi themi97, please use either highway=proposed + proposed=footway or proposed:highway=*, right now data consuers will treat these as actual footways, ignoring proposed=yes tag. Thanks! --- Published using... commented 2025-10-12 12:04:49 UTC by mos_next_door ♦23 |
| 173176902 (Comments: 1) | SOSOwner (Discussed changesets: 13) | And that's the Chelmsford Shuttles practically done! Took only 3 years for someone to actually update the routes... commented 2025-10-12 12:04:44 UTC by SOSOwner ♦13 |
| 173017026 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | I recommend that you do not map proposed bypasses in Greece that are not yet approved and ready for construction: we see a lot of proposals in the news, but many don't see the light of day. commented 2025-10-12 12:03:19 UTC by ika-chan! ♦288 |
| 173118591 (Comments: 1) | declanmar (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1437037055. The building doesn't exists, but the shop exists? commented 2025-10-12 12:03:09 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173175416 (Comments: 2) | tijlhart2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building:part%3Dyes commented 2025-10-12 11:47:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173060073 (Comments: 2) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | I also wish that you do not map ways that have been demolished, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436727127. That is for OpenHistoricalMap, not for our project. commented 2025-10-12 11:36:07 UTC by ika-chan! ♦288 |
| 173173433 (Comments: 1) | rdfrs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, I merged your info with the present addressnode. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-10-12 11:35:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173048475 (Comments: 3) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 386) | 'name:kmal' didn't exist until a few days ago and 'ref:kmal' was used a lot less than 'ref:KMAL'. commented 2025-10-12 11:34:43 UTC by mueschel ♦6,681 |
| 173174868 (Comments: 1) | Hashley G (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-12 11:32:44 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173110970 (Comments: 3) | CoBoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | You don’t need to send the document. If those names are visible for anyone passing by, that is okay. I suggest you add the names on the various buildings, if you want. Just make sure that if the name is different in French and Dutch,... commented 2025-10-12 11:18:24 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,572 |
| 173156118 (Comments: 2) | Liongrass (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Comino, Thank you for noticing. You're right, the business is closed and I meant to remove all tags. I will attempt again! commented 2025-10-12 11:11:19 UTC by Liongrass ♦13 |
 | 172769407 (Comments: 1) | Sredoje (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ponovo smo ti izbrisali izmenu. Imao si dve blokade, samo trazimo da nam se javis, da se dogovorimo sto konstantno menjas ovo. Molim te nemoj bez konsultacija sa zajednicom. -- We reverted your change again. You already had 2 blockades, we just... commented 2025-10-12 11:04:55 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦314 |
| 171652417 (Comments: 3) | MDe (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you. Actually disused=yes is used for about 2/3 of the trenches in Germany, so that seems to be proper solution. The disused:XXX-scheme is more modern but aims mostly at situations where reactivation of objects is plausible. <... commented 2025-10-12 11:04:07 UTC by limes11 ♦953 |
 | 173159147 (Comments: 2) | kelianor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо! Буду знать :) commented 2025-10-12 11:03:29 UTC by kelianor ♦1 |
| 147825743 (Comments: 2) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 122) | Oh sorry, da hab ich wohl was übersehen. commented 2025-10-12 11:02:18 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,398 |
| 173125409 (Comments: 2) | Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 176) | Ja, ich habe heute noch weitere Details erfasst und hätte die Note dann schließen können (jetzt erledigt). commented 2025-10-12 10:59:08 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,160 |
| 173079784 (Comments: 3) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ik denk dat je POI's en gebouwen door elkaar haalt. Apps als Every Door en ook de iD-editor op OSM.org maken het bewerken laagdrempelig, maar maken het minder duidelijk wat je precies aan het doen bent. Bij de iD-editor zie je onderaan wel een l... commented 2025-10-12 10:58:24 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173170613 (Comments: 1) | pitfire (Discussed changesets: 39) | Text im Änderungssatz ist NONSENS Simple Bearbeitung Hinweis Nr. 5002025 & Erledigter Hinweis Nr. 5002024 :-( commented 2025-10-12 10:50:22 UTC by pitfire ♦690 |
| 172934414 (Comments: 2) | TimbyT (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features commented 2025-10-12 10:20:35 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
 | 172929358 (Comments: 1) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19684976. What is the mean of the tags codigo_via = 5501 last_update = 2011-01-01 length = 1118 pr_final = 21+1118 pr_inicial = 0 ref:igac = 5501 ref:mt = 5501 tramo = ... commented 2025-10-12 10:13:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173171409 (Comments: 1) | MarkLammers21 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Dag Mark Zo kan het natuurlijk wel als duidelijk is dat het niet voor de fiets bedoeld is. Wellicht surface=grass ipv unpaved MVG eggie commented 2025-10-12 10:13:08 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 171289513 (Comments: 3) | UtterClutter (Discussed changesets: 30) | That looks better now, thanks: the building footprint is showing up. commented 2025-10-12 10:09:58 UTC by Paul Flo Williams ♦6 |
| 173171256 (Comments: 1) | Hashley G (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Hashley G, Please read our Wiki on how to "Verifying Existing Merchants". https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Verifying-Existing-Merchants Happy mapping, Edwin Comino https://btcmap.org/tagg... commented 2025-10-12 10:09:27 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 133139326 (Comments: 2) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 302) | The purple arrows are apparently used as part of a national network of loops. Make of that what you will. commented 2025-10-12 10:05:15 UTC by b-unicycling ♦252 |
| 173150074 (Comments: 2) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 27) | Zaraz to skoryguję, bo jeszcze oddany do użytku będzie BW 1920 04 commented 2025-10-12 10:00:05 UTC by Anas masuris ♦136 |
| 173163820 (Comments: 1) | Elya_Kozharina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Это Китай. Если вы не знаете точное китайское название, пожалуйста, не пишите его. Спасибо. commented 2025-10-12 09:53:43 UTC by Taksine ♦112 |
| 165607516 (Comments: 1) | Houderl (Discussed changesets: 5) | I am sorry. What? The road is in fact built there, if you are too lazy to go there yourself you may visit https://mapy.com/en/zakladni?x=12.8032058&y=49.4680972&z=15 to verify. Why would you out of nowhere just permanently delete the road I p... commented 2025-10-12 09:44:52 UTC by Histmy ♦1 |
| 172716338 (Comments: 3) | pb&je89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I do not recommend it either, but to access shops on the roadside, we must keep foot access. Thanks! commented 2025-10-12 09:42:10 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦429 |
| 173169798 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-12 09:21:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172544403 (Comments: 1) | itsash88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | cześć, linii autobusowych nie dodaje się osobnymi liniami, tylko tworzy relację połączenia na istniejących liniach dróg. To wszystko jest do porawy commented 2025-10-12 09:12:35 UTC by grelus ♦162 |
| 172519400 (Comments: 1) | guidro88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | cześć, linii autobusowych nie dodaje się osobnymi liniami, tylko tworzy relację połączenia na istniejących liniach dróg. To wszystko jest do porawy commented 2025-10-12 09:12:05 UTC by grelus ♦162 |
| 173160860 (Comments: 1) | igorpashkov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2025-10-12 08:46:17 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 172167764 (Comments: 2) | okadatsuneo (Discussed changesets: 19) | 学校のグラウンドをpeisure=pitchとするのは昔日本のコミュニティで質問して、「pitchを使う」と聞いたのでそうしています。 amenity=schoolのwikiにも「leisure=pitchを運動場のタグ付けに使う... commented 2025-10-12 08:16:06 UTC by okadatsuneo ♦80 |
| 173165440 (Comments: 4) | p321 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dank je. Jouw informatie en oplossing wordt gewaardeerd. commented 2025-10-12 07:35:49 UTC by p321 ♦2 |
| 172931430 (Comments: 2) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 27) | Dank voor de correctie. Was me niet bewust van dat ik die ook verwijderd had (was ook niet de bedoeling) maar zal er in de toekomst beter op letten commented 2025-10-12 07:26:46 UTC by kOSMofant ♦5 |
| 164274017 (Comments: 1) | DDD丶Samuel (Discussed changesets: 13) | 请不要将未开通的铁路站点标记为已建成开通，请妥善使用 [Lifecycle prefix](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) commented 2025-10-12 07:24:38 UTC by XD346 ♦31 |
| 173161982 (Comments: 4) | p321 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb 79 weer teruggezet. Dat nummer zou andersverdwenen zijn van de kaart. Bezetten hier twee bedrijven een zelfde nummer? Ik zal je nog een welkomstmail per PB sturen met handige tips en tricks. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-12 07:23:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173165612 (Comments: 1) | X_223- (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi X_223-, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 highway(s) - 1 waterway(s) Could you pleas... commented 2025-10-12 07:14:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
 | 173098665 (Comments: 1) | De C (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1436939832. What is the mean of the tag buiding:min = 4? Did you mean building:min_level? commented 2025-10-12 07:07:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173165280 (Comments: 1) | Viktor Sokyrko (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-12 07:00:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172944281 (Comments: 6) | mtb_93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your useful tips. I'll try to do the best I can with the info I have. commented 2025-10-12 06:49:37 UTC by mtb_93 ♦1 |
| 173123572 (Comments: 1) | Hooza (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch commented 2025-10-12 06:48:09 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦24 |
| 173036129 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 106) | * USRNs, not UPRNs! commented 2025-10-12 06:32:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 173127006 (Comments: 1) | Brazzelli Roberto (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ciao Braz! In una relazione hiking, cioè per pedoni, il ruolo backward (e anche forward) non hanno senso. A meno che non ci siano dei tratti di strada dove i pedoni sono obbligati per legge a seguire una sola direzione! Ivo commented 2025-10-12 06:28:53 UTC by Jrachi ♦790 |
| 173153570 (Comments: 1) | JB932948 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The pub is already mapped as Way: Sussex Arms (311904776) and Relation: The Sussex Arms (8757463). Thus I've added your data to the building outline. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-10-12 06:24:26 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,938 |
| 173121817 (Comments: 3) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks so much! Our community has many of these issues. As a dispatcher, trying to help my neighbors fix them. Im only just learning but its making a real impact. commented 2025-10-12 06:02:42 UTC by Dispatch_Cloud ♦1 |
| 172815323 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Omaha-Millard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172852371 commented 2025-10-12 05:22:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,588 |
| 172821558 (Comments: 2) | Estellia Aesthetic (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172828580 commented 2025-10-12 05:21:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172828932 (Comments: 3) | Acre Wood Dental - Round Rock (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172856574 commented 2025-10-12 05:20:51 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172832713 (Comments: 2) | Jerzy Wycisk fizjoterapeuta (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163475 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:20:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172840676 (Comments: 2) | dogtopiaofoldbridge (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172856111 commented 2025-10-12 05:19:21 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172853514 (Comments: 2) | lunarequest (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172853559 commented 2025-10-12 05:19:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172888612 (Comments: 2) | usa_d4acpk8m (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173163454 commented 2025-10-12 05:17:58 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172888858 (Comments: 2) | usa_d4acpk8m (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173163448 commented 2025-10-12 05:17:22 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172913211 (Comments: 2) | Burnside Express Collision - Greenwood (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173163432 commented 2025-10-12 05:16:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172910872 (Comments: 1) | Fun Bags Cornhole Lounge (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163411 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:15:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172940077 (Comments: 2) | Fun Bags Cornhole Lounge (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163406 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:14:44 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172955360 (Comments: 2) | 4esthetics Lounge (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172992418 commented 2025-10-12 05:13:40 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
 | 172964799 (Comments: 2) | Supreme Car Rent (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172965518 commented 2025-10-12 05:13:13 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172981008 (Comments: 2) | medellino (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163369 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:12:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172985887 (Comments: 2) | Troy M Moore (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173017271 commented 2025-10-12 05:10:39 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 172988377 (Comments: 2) | instituteofchildpsychology (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163334 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-12 05:09:57 UTC by NeisRevert ♦255 |
| 172989135 (Comments: 2) | TN Computer Medics (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173022160 commented 2025-10-12 05:09:10 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173010777 (Comments: 2) | Kyzar AC Repair Boynton Beach (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173020905 commented 2025-10-12 05:08:52 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173012058 (Comments: 2) | Kyzar AC Repair Port St Lucie (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173020864 commented 2025-10-12 05:08:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173026126 (Comments: 2) | SK Quality Roofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173033562 commented 2025-10-12 05:08:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173026317 (Comments: 2) | SK Quality Roofing- (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173033486 commented 2025-10-12 05:07:45 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,259 |
| 173120501 (Comments: 3) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 15) | Long-term, seems this should be converted to the modern PTv2 schema to make it easier to work with, more widely consumable and follow current best practice, though as that's a major change to existing practice and should presumably be done in co... commented 2025-10-12 05:04:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦47 |
| 166876885 (Comments: 1) | MichaelSmith836213 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 不知来源如何，实际上 highway=residential 才是更常见的用法，具体参考如广州大学城、香港理工大学及欧洲各大学等的案例 commented 2025-10-12 04:55:43 UTC by Higashimado ♦3 |
| 173161802 (Comments: 1) | Mahian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mahian, Thank you for your contributions and welcome to OSM! Everything looks good with your edit and is of high quality. Since you are a new mapper I have a few resources if you need assistance with future edits. Resources ca... commented 2025-10-12 03:57:24 UTC by PcMouse1 ♦66 |
 | 173161359 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 19) | labubu commented 2025-10-12 02:44:13 UTC by Sharko_J ♦89 |
| 173029414 (Comments: 4) | JBeverley (Discussed changesets: 1) | The vast majority of buses stop at the location of the physical bus stop sign, which is where the bus stop should be marked on the map, and where passengers would be waiting. All of the stop_positions marked on the map that I've seen in the Denv... commented 2025-10-12 02:13:01 UTC by JBeverley ♦1 |
| 172261416 (Comments: 3) | anthaas (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks for your reply. Re imagery: Of course I think that there are inaccuracies when looking at the imagery used for mapping the footprints. I you view my changeset one of the buildings differs by a factor of two, though most are probably a ... commented 2025-10-12 02:00:54 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173155489 (Comments: 1) | njberks (Discussed changesets: 2) | RE: the area around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13205320063 When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fair... commented 2025-10-12 01:37:55 UTC by b-jazz ♦734 |
| 173160441 (Comments: 1) | skladasljkd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi skladasljkd, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your wor... commented 2025-10-12 01:27:21 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 173159178 (Comments: 2) | SOSOwner (Discussed changesets: 13) | (Ignore the larger than normal changeset area. Some additional routes had modified operator tags. Roads mentioned in the changeset are in or around Beaulieu Park.) commented 2025-10-11 23:42:11 UTC by SOSOwner ♦13 |
 | 169433670 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 169435530 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169433707 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169377183 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169433533 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169433128 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169430748 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169428497 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169428409 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169428394 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169396270 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169377242 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169376887 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 169320935 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 169320673 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169320648 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169320594 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169320530 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169277256 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169178623 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 169178423 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 169085812 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168994315 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168994075 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168993968 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168993932 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168993882 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168903497 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168903429 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168989177 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168990095 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168898762 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168898611 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168897662 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168896948 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168896881 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168895181 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168895032 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168864954 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168894891 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168899083 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168899055 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168898828 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168898648 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168902943 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| X | 168864767 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122 commented 2025-10-11 23:35:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173123813 (Comments: 2) | pppc (Discussed changesets: 1) | i don't saw this in map either by searching the chinese restaurant name or in web version commented 2025-10-11 23:30:15 UTC by pppc ♦1 |
| 168859220 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858995 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858849 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858900 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858788 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858472 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858375 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168858287 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857990 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857353 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857338 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168857254 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857249 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168856321 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168854184 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168853583 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168852815 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168852784 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168852719 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168826136 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168857110 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168857039 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168854232 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168819769 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168819906 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168818457 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168819359 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168819558 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168825650 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168825592 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168825524 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168818358 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168781189 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168781356 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168781891 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168816451 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168818323 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168818408 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:30:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168779177 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168781119 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168765170 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168765253 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168778013 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168778373 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168778768 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168778868 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168780436 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012 commented 2025-10-11 23:29:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764602 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764959 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764722 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764739 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764876 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764922 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168762630 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168722528 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168736800 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168737091 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168737729 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168762612 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168762740 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168762879 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168763000 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168763130 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168763231 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168764556 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 168581389 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168721696 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168604295 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168581342 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168721598 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168648993 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168649150 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168604184 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168721472 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168581228 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168603770 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168722290 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168648801 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168515332 (Comments: 2) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167434613 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167470238 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167514365 (Comments: 3) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168514681 (Comments: 2) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168515256 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168515525 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168560586 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168561069 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 168581025 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 167434160 (Comments: 1) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 146) | DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841 commented 2025-10-11 23:20:13 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 173156681 (Comments: 1) | Semillero LATAM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Si bien las casas están todas bien dibujadas aparentemente, hay unas uno metros delante de otras, varias están desalineadas. Para corregir eso puedes tirar una línea provisoria que conecte los frontis y las partes tr... commented 2025-10-11 22:53:34 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 173144980 (Comments: 1) | Paul Flo Williams (Discussed changesets: 7) | With thanks commented 2025-10-11 22:53:32 UTC by UtterClutter ♦36 |
| 160896603 (Comments: 2) | adas (Discussed changesets: 71) | Możesz rzucić okiem na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4860583? Nie znalazłem nigdzie takiej nazwy, commented 2025-10-11 22:34:50 UTC by uprkos ♦55 |
| 173157953 (Comments: 1) | SuborbitalPigeon (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173157953 commented 2025-10-11 22:31:15 UTC by SuborbitalPigeon ♦30 |
| 171068073 (Comments: 1) | RomanMinárik (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdravim, aky chodnik tu chybal? Napr. popri Kmetovej od krizovatky s Vinicky na sever ziadny chodnik nie je (aspon v 2/2025), je tam len cyklocesta. Odvtedy nejaky pristavali? Taktiez ta cyklocesta popri Dubikovej je velmi divna. Je fyzicky od... commented 2025-10-11 22:18:56 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 146358921 (Comments: 1) | slymarekivan (Discussed changesets: 30) | Zdravim, na mnohych miestach je tento cyklochodnik zdielany s schodcami, takze nebolo potrebne pridavat novu ciaru (kedze nie je fyzicky oddeleny od chodnika pre pesich). Stacilo zmenit vlastnosti povodneho chodnika. Opravil som. commented 2025-10-11 22:18:49 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 169858336 (Comments: 5) | c674a (Discussed changesets: 1) | La maggior parte dell'area è de-facto formata da parti di terra mista cemento (con il passare del tempo poi la vegetazione ha preso il sopravvento) in quanto sono stati demoliti parecchi edifici, per questo la ratio che avevo usato era qu... commented 2025-10-11 22:08:55 UTC by c674a ♦1 |
| 172896880 (Comments: 1) | dasha_polsha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Почему вы удалили трубопроводы? commented 2025-10-11 22:04:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 153401397 (Comments: 1) | RRIbarruri (Discussed changesets: 22) | Не может улица называться улица Весенняя. это не по-русски. commented 2025-10-11 21:58:53 UTC by Глеб ♦137 |
| 173081072 (Comments: 7) | Florian Reichartshausen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, eine Möglichkeit wäre vielleicht fire_hydrant:style =round. Das wäre das Gegenstück zu fire_hydrant:style=rectangle, was in München recht weit verbreitet ist. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-11 21:36:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 173014056 (Comments: 1) | Timo_G (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, frag am besten hier nach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117014611 Er wird sich wohl erinnern, wo diese Ladestation steht. VG commented 2025-10-11 21:33:53 UTC by limes11 ♦953 |
| 172893875 (Comments: 1) | WindOfHope (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Тут два монумента или это дубликат? commented 2025-10-11 21:30:53 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 173156557 (Comments: 1) | Graptemys (Discussed changesets: 19) | Found an article about it: https://www.chmafm.com/welcome/landmark-visitor-info-building-in-aulac-torn-down-by-dti-after-unanswered-enquiries-from-tantramar-2/ commented 2025-10-11 21:29:01 UTC by Graptemys ♦33 |
| 172966433 (Comments: 1) | nlogidzon68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Название Spal точно верное? https://osm.org/node/4346181057 commented 2025-10-11 21:28:32 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172891542 (Comments: 1) | Nortaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Обратите внимание, что вы рисуете по старым снимкам Bing. Используйте более свежие снимки ESRI commented 2025-10-11 21:27:22 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172984336 (Comments: 3) | TMomä (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tämä ja muut hyvät käytännöt mm. tuo aiemmin mainittu "don't map for the renderer" löytyvät täältä ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice commented 2025-10-11 21:26:37 UTC by houtari ♦52 |
| 173156261 (Comments: 1) | Deftax (Discussed changesets: 8) | Jeżeli chodzi o zagospodarowanie terenu, to będę usuwać "duży" obszar mieszkalny i zastępować go wieloma mniejszymi (tak jak powinno być), więc jeśli chodzi o ten duży obszar to przez następny ok. tydzień mogą tam być r&oacut... commented 2025-10-11 21:24:19 UTC by Deftax ♦4 |
| 169979576 (Comments: 1) | LordMadsen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi LordMadsen, danke für's eintragen. Eine Fußpflege ist doch aber kein Arzt? commented 2025-10-11 21:15:04 UTC by Polarbear ♦944 |
| 173077362 (Comments: 1) | TMomä (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mikähän rakennelma mahtaa olla kyseessä? Ilmakuva ja MML:n maastokartta antaisi viitteitä että olisi jokin muu kuin man_made=tar_kiln, eli tervahauta joksi tuo on nyt merkattu. commented 2025-10-11 21:14:20 UTC by houtari ♦52 |
| 172240828 (Comments: 1) | Marvin de Hont (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello, I would say you partially improved/updated the residential areas here by including buildings and residential areas in settlements, however a significant proportion of both residential areas includes water from the river which shouldn't ge... commented 2025-10-11 20:50:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173096301 (Comments: 2) | rlaracol (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hola rlaracol, hay muchos cercos que intersectan con casas, que en algunos casos probablemente no existen o son muros. Además en muchos casos el polígono no se corresponde con la forma de la casa. Saludos. commented 2025-10-11 20:43:39 UTC by jptolosa ♦214 |
| 173144775 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 608) | Tak to wygląda: https://polska-org.pl/11721898,foto.html Więcej betonu niż zieleni, więc nie park commented 2025-10-11 20:42:33 UTC by maro21 ♦739 |
| 173094581 (Comments: 1) | Kraan46 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Please consider the context, landuse, errosion, vegetation and other features when mapping residential areas. Here much of the Western part of the selltlment is flooded in the most recent imagery, either due to a high water level or river bank errosi... commented 2025-10-11 20:41:34 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 15928950 (Comments: 2) | pnorman (Discussed changesets: 12) | I don't have my 2013 photos on my current server, but my vague recollection is that's because the name was 169th Street. I re-checked with 2015 Mapillary images and the name is not 169th Place NE or 169th Street Northeast. I conside... commented 2025-10-11 20:40:34 UTC by pnorman ♦318 |
| 173132663 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | I didn't add this tag. commented 2025-10-11 20:38:06 UTC by mueschel ♦6,681 |
| 173121513 (Comments: 1) | OnlyAppleCanDo (Discussed changesets: 5) | 你好，南湾路大部为双向六车道道理，暂时达不到快速公路的标准。 commented 2025-10-11 20:34:26 UTC by LokNeko ♦14 |
| 173146287 (Comments: 1) | pixelpete (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1437155048 is probably just an arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163661282, not a riding center. commented 2025-10-11 20:30:44 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦823 |
| 169733887 (Comments: 2) | djoot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej, Jag var där och de sa att det går bra att betala kontant :). Kommer inte ihåg om jag gjorde det eller inte dock... Alla ställen som jag lagt till är efter personliga besök där jag har fråg... commented 2025-10-11 20:30:19 UTC by djoot ♦1 |
| 173143277 (Comments: 1) | hossader (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ta zmiana zduplikowala adresy. Dodales adres na budynkach, jednoczesnie pozostawiajac taki sma adres przed budynkiem. commented 2025-10-11 20:22:38 UTC by MaciekMma ♦68 |
 | 173139849 (Comments: 1) | Raudel Roque Rodríguez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-11 20:17:56 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173096213 (Comments: 1) | melody_Tej (Discussed changesets: 16) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170662263 commented 2025-10-11 20:14:53 UTC by Romwriter ♦203 |
| 173152309 (Comments: 2) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Now i read again an you segmented the wood part, not the park. Sorry. commented 2025-10-11 20:07:45 UTC by rarad74 ♦298 |
| 172716867 (Comments: 3) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | Oh and it would be fine to add the namespace to the other tags as well if we could be sure they referred to the razed feature and not a potential current feature tagged on the same entity. Namespacing `information` is safe since it's supposed to... commented 2025-10-11 19:58:50 UTC by quincylvania ♦65 |
| 173137112 (Comments: 1) | utvonalfelmeresek (Discussed changesets: 43) | Szia! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13208610639 crossing_ref helyett manapság csak a crossing:markings-ot használjuk, sokkal részletesebben le lehet írni felfestéseket: https://wiki.openstreetmap.... commented 2025-10-11 19:50:55 UTC by infeeeee ♦592 |
| 173118970 (Comments: 2) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- ... commented 2025-10-11 19:43:25 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173152760 (Comments: 1) | marekmich (Discussed changesets: 34) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13226531612 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-10-11 19:40:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173118825 (Comments: 1) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway for the definition of highway=tertiary. Edit reverted. I'll send you more info in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2025-10-11 19:35:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173142954 (Comments: 1) | xKmiloSx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wycofano: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173152676 commented 2025-10-11 19:34:08 UTC by czebureks ♦118 |
| 173118294 (Comments: 1) | Dispatch_Cloud (Discussed changesets: 6) | LIDAR does show this as a road, though it could be overgrown. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173118294 commented 2025-10-11 19:32:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173049793 (Comments: 2) | ycukor (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Belarus Згодна зь вікі, футпас пачаткова ўжо мае bicycle=yes. Чышчу ад бязсэнсоўнага :) commented 2025-10-11 19:31:03 UTC by ycukor ♦2 |
| 173109136 (Comments: 1) | Iwaskilled (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: flock devices should not be connected to ways, like sidewalks. I usually look for a poles shadow when adding things like this. I went ahead and unglued the device. --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-10-11 19:28:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173151604 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 48) | I think this restriction was left over from the temporary closure of westbound Randolph Road in 2021-2022. I have on hand a track from 2025-08-02 that shows that I took the turn in question; I think that's sufficient evidence that it's no ... commented 2025-10-11 19:16:29 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦67 |
| 173148063 (Comments: 2) | mosaico (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh, Entschuldigung, ja natürlich, ich wollte den Siezenheimer Steg wieder sichtbar machen, nachdem der neue Steg heute eröffnet wurde. Dank.e. commented 2025-10-11 19:09:08 UTC by mosaico ♦2 |
| 137947007 (Comments: 8) | habi (Discussed changesets: 390) | Ich habe die Grenzen von Wohnoase Mos an den Rändern etwas angepasst siehe Karte und Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173147313. Falls ich noch etwas verbessern kann, sagt mir bitte Bescheid. Ich denke, hier bin ich jetzt soweit... commented 2025-10-11 18:55:59 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦16 |
| 167860285 (Comments: 1) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 21) | Please make sure that when road geometry is modified that the PTv2 routes are maintained. Thank you. QA tool: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.86285&lat=33.83573&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%... commented 2025-10-11 18:51:58 UTC by Mxdanger ♦78 |
| 173150946 (Comments: 1) | notmyproblem1 (Discussed changesets: 25) | scusatemi per il big changeset commented 2025-10-11 18:46:37 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦100 |
| 173145406 (Comments: 1) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi review_requested \tyes: This way it's okay. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine Greetz, eggie commented 2025-10-11 18:41:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 152889929 (Comments: 1) | Ashwini S Kumar (Discussed changesets: 7) | Building shapes far to big - 3x or 5x bigger than imagery. Please narrow shapes. commented 2025-10-11 18:40:40 UTC by miluethi ♦315 |
| 173126077 (Comments: 3) | Treinfan (Discussed changesets: 3) | I now have added names, sourcing wikipedia (easiest reference). For a few junctions I couldn't find a name, so I have removed those. commented 2025-10-11 18:33:13 UTC by Treinfan ♦1 |
| 171795003 (Comments: 1) | StrikeMind (Discussed changesets: 4) | goodbye sternberger 🫡🪦 commented 2025-10-11 18:27:32 UTC by JustSomeMapper ♦5 |
| 166114240 (Comments: 1) | Ali-K2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 多谢编辑。对于这种森林请用简单多边形，不要使用关系 commented 2025-10-11 18:24:20 UTC by EnumMapper ♦51 |
| 173137197 (Comments: 1) | Demir Berke Soltay (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-10-11 18:22:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173125334 (Comments: 1) | archer8472 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Archer, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small... commented 2025-10-11 18:19:04 UTC by Metzor ♦386 |
| 173118667 (Comments: 1) | Fan7787 (Discussed changesets: 22) | "future" but you have deleted a highway that currently exists. Can you explain this edit in more detail? commented 2025-10-11 18:18:27 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 172663022 (Comments: 2) | Neet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Geen idee wat de uiteindelijke situatie gaat worden, maar er gaan wel huizen gebouwd worden en dit hebben ze bestraat. commented 2025-10-11 18:13:14 UTC by Neet ♦1 |
| 172858095 (Comments: 2) | didier2020 (Discussed changesets: 60) | Ok forget it, apparently he has already started revetring... commented 2025-10-11 18:05:59 UTC by Bierphysik ♦91 |
| 173147172 (Comments: 2) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 122) | Kein Problem, war schnell gemacht :) commented 2025-10-11 18:00:43 UTC by Piagno ♦108 |
| 168226566 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 40) | Poprawiłem tagowanie, ale mam duże wątpliwości co do prawdziwości tych danych. Jakie jest źródło danych o przebiegu granicy? commented 2025-10-11 17:59:36 UTC by SpinOff ♦314 |
| 169572924 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 40) | Jakie jest źródło nazw "Krzemienie Karmelowe" i "Kartofel"? commented 2025-10-11 17:49:58 UTC by SpinOff ♦314 |
| 173094249 (Comments: 1) | Krzywas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, something went wrong here. All the nodes have tags that shouldn't be in OSM like "orig_easting" or "merged_source_files". Fire hydrants are also usually tagged differently: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... commented 2025-10-11 17:45:37 UTC by mueschel ♦6,681 |
| 172244058 (Comments: 10) | GUFSZ (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ok dein Ton klingt immer noch "pissed" aber bitte. Und sorry, aber scheinbar hast du dir das CS hier keine Sekunde angesehen um mein Anliegen nachzuvollziehen. Aber bitte sehr. Von meiner Seite ist alles gesagt. commented 2025-10-11 17:45:24 UTC by Bierphysik ♦91 |
| 169919515 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 40) | Map_Rivers ma historię dodawania do mapy fikcyjnych rzeczy. Przy braku odpowiedzi od razu bym takie edycje wycofywał. commented 2025-10-11 17:41:49 UTC by SpinOff ♦314 |
| 173051489 (Comments: 1) | josh09dmello (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, something went wrong with this import. Did you read and obey the Import Guidelines? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines Regarding the tagging: - 'name:alt' should be 'alt_name' - "o... commented 2025-10-11 17:40:44 UTC by mueschel ♦6,681 |
| 172368159 (Comments: 1) | Smaug7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Smaug7, Welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. Because of our slightly unusual street names here in Utah, we have a specific page on the wiki about it (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions). Spe... commented 2025-10-11 17:37:11 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦47 |
| 171308388 (Comments: 1) | AUPA_EG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour l'AUPA. Vous avez fait une erreur, il n'y a pas de voie verte sur la route de Violesi (pas pour le moment en tout cas). commented 2025-10-11 17:32:52 UTC by Adava Pays d'Aix ♦14 |
| 173025710 (Comments: 3) | AndreaDp271 (Discussed changesets: 6) | hi, its a test for a proposal page commented 2025-10-11 17:31:23 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦131 |
| 173147729 (Comments: 1) | cpm01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Business is a: Thrift Shop for children's goods. Clothing, Toys, sports equipment Prams, etc Category Toy Store doesn't really fit Further Occupys 2 bays in strip mall & I am unable to... commented 2025-10-11 17:28:56 UTC by cpm01 ♦2 |
| 173144205 (Comments: 1) | cpm01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok a thing no Category I can find that fits. It's a business that is a fun play space for kids. has a website, ph#, & such info but under Category "Playground" no such information can be included.<... commented 2025-10-11 17:24:56 UTC by cpm01 ♦2 |
| 173147115 (Comments: 1) | Map-Contributor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Amazing thanks commented 2025-10-11 17:17:32 UTC by RushMM ♦3 |
| 170751548 (Comments: 1) | padvinder (Discussed changesets: 229) | Heb jij met deze changeset de gebouwen van Doggersvaart 2/4 weer ingetekend? Ik meen dat ik die al weggehaald had. Die gebouwen zijn dit voorjaar/afgelopen zomer gesloopt. commented 2025-10-11 17:16:59 UTC by Larshei ♦14 |
| 173147140 (Comments: 1) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Nog even opgezocht.. Bij fitness is de tag leisure=fitness_centre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre commented 2025-10-11 17:07:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 136389010 (Comments: 2) | Gianfilippo96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ops, ha perfettamente senso, in effetti. Mi spiace. commented 2025-10-11 16:55:53 UTC by Gianfilippo96 ♦1 |
| 173143120 (Comments: 6) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Oke.. in dat geval kun je de info op de gebouwomtrek overzetten naar adresnode 29 en die 29a haal je leeg. Daar stond die voetbalvereniging op. Evt pas je m aan leisure=fitness commented 2025-10-11 16:55:22 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173012418 (Comments: 3) | balka41 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay.. enjoy mapping. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-11 16:52:27 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173139694 (Comments: 1) | cykloabc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Prechod pre chodcov ste presunuli do budovy. Na značku shop treba použiť len dohodnuté kľúče inak to aplikácie nepoznajú. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bicycle Aj otvárací ča... commented 2025-10-11 16:50:33 UTC by Dodko ♦1,240 |
| 173116620 (Comments: 1) | Teevolve (Discussed changesets: 2) | I reverted this change as there were several problems with it. * You broke up the fairway on the first hole into two line strings and then combined them with a multipolygon. There isn't any reason to do this. It should remain as a single... commented 2025-10-11 16:49:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦734 |
 | 166726853 (Comments: 1) | WT Hundu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi WT Hundu. While mapping some waterways, I noticed very small residential areas in a larger residential area here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389490341/history#map=19/7.342733/9.705768 This is not usually correct. Then I noticed that they... commented 2025-10-11 16:38:09 UTC by Adrian Shobrooke ♦15 |
| 161040770 (Comments: 1) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi you added a name and ref= to the road in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15678090/. There is a note saying this is wrong, can you take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4797669 commented 2025-10-11 16:04:17 UTC by cuzi ♦128 |
| 173141052 (Comments: 1) | Lobo69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-11 15:49:56 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173108752 (Comments: 1) | Davidos64bot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you change the Basic Fit from 24/7 to some made-up opening hours even though the tagged Panoramax image and even the link you added both show 24/7? commented 2025-10-11 15:42:39 UTC by sykul ♦64 |
| 173069345 (Comments: 4) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | access:conditional=no @ (2025 Oct 06-2025 Dec 19) toegevoegd commented 2025-10-11 15:33:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 144013573 (Comments: 1) | ReinerWermes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, nur zur Info: Öffnungszeiten werden in OSM mit Englischen Wochentages-Namen geschrieben. statt: "Di-Fr 09:30-18:00; Sa 08:00-14:00" muss es heißen "Tu-Fr 09:30-18:00; Sa 10:00-13:00". Der Fehler ist korr... commented 2025-10-11 15:15:55 UTC by jmsbert ♦164 |
| 173141071 (Comments: 1) | Lobo69 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Lobo.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-11 15:06:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173140372 (Comments: 2) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Check! commented 2025-10-11 15:05:46 UTC by Rene1974 ♦6 |
| 173139247 (Comments: 1) | JuMi37 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for this, the changes look good. It is advised to upload changes separately. Per theme and/or per area. Next time, if you want to change a speed limit on one area, add the surface type elsewhere... commented 2025-10-11 15:05:02 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,572 |
| 173122228 (Comments: 1) | Rowe99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=toilets?uselang=en#Toilets_within_places For toilets within places, simply add toilets=yes, no need for a separate node. commented 2025-10-11 15:04:51 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 168849021 (Comments: 12) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Actually, looking at recent news, it seems to me the park-and-ride aspect/attractiveness is being diminished: e.g. https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%E6%B8%AF%E8%81%9E/article/20250828/s00002/1756317494666/%E6%B8%AF%E9%90%B5%E6%B3%8A%E8%BB%8... commented 2025-10-11 14:54:59 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦53 |
| 173089636 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 421) | Please stop adding the operator to the name and housenumbers to street names. I'll revert this incorrect changeset. commented 2025-10-11 14:51:05 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173090890 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 421) | This change adds POI information to a building. We tag POI's on addresses, which had already been done. I'll revert this change. Please stop making these kind of changes. commented 2025-10-11 14:48:38 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173020844 (Comments: 4) | literan (Discussed changesets: 201) | @Variags Здравствуйте. Вам сложно ответить, так как вы задаёте много вопросов сразу. Ответы можно найти в вики-проекта: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-11 14:47:32 UTC by mavl ♦76,131 |
| 173082352 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 421) | Please stop making these incorrect changes. commented 2025-10-11 14:47:14 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173138980 (Comments: 6) | JosM34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Accesstags toegevoegd conform NL:C1 commented 2025-10-11 14:45:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173081015 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 421) | In this changeset the name is changed from the actual name to the operator, the housenumber is added to the addr:street-tag and the phone number is added double. I'll revert this incorrect changeset. commented 2025-10-11 14:45:42 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173091344 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 421) | In this changeset the name is changed from the actual name to the operator and the phone number is added double. I'll revert this incorrect changeset. commented 2025-10-11 14:43:38 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173105150 (Comments: 4) | Francoisepro (Discussed changesets: 3) | See here: it could be correct/legit to add the footway=sidewalk tag here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Cycleway_and_footway_on_sidewalk commented 2025-10-11 14:29:02 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦429 |
| 173140111 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 113) | Corregida dirección. commented 2025-10-11 14:28:07 UTC by dcapillae ♦381 |
| 173139196 (Comments: 3) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 8) | OP het gebouw... Je kunt die nodes gewoon naar elkaar toeschuiven en dus combineren. Editor iD plakt alles aan elkaar. commented 2025-10-11 14:27:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173137240 (Comments: 1) | Steinn Mortensen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej, hvis du mener der er fejl i adresserne, skal du rette henvendelse til Egedal kommune, kommunen er adresseansvarlig. Adressepunkterne bliver automatisk opdateret, så din ændring vil blive tilbageført. commented 2025-10-11 14:16:07 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,708 |
| 171436143 (Comments: 1) | Yod4z (Discussed changesets: 30) | Attention a la typo de l'exploitant "Enedis" :) commented 2025-10-11 14:12:56 UTC by jbcharron ♦120 |
| 172280827 (Comments: 1) | Jean-Pierre Rondeau (Discussed changesets: 38) | Bonjour, Je me permet de corriger une erreur que vous avez faites, une ligne électrique Enedis a été taggé à tort avec power=line de plus il est préférable de nommer le nom de l'exploitant sous... commented 2025-10-11 14:11:06 UTC by jbcharron ♦120 |
| X | 172968285 (Comments: 1) | Neethu P G (Discussed changesets: 361) | You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"?? commented 2025-10-11 14:08:08 UTC by InsertUser ♦460 |
| 112815029 (Comments: 4) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 95) | Sure, especially since the proper conditional speed is already on the following segment eastbound. commented 2025-10-11 14:02:12 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,183 |
| 173125319 (Comments: 10) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Top, dankjewel. Ik knutsel rustig verder. Mapcomplete had ik inderdaad al gebruikt voor de ondergrond van sportvelden. commented 2025-10-11 13:31:05 UTC by Rene1974 ♦6 |
| 173103694 (Comments: 1) | OnlySamBlyat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Просьба не херачить казахскую латиницу в name:en commented 2025-10-11 13:23:33 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦34 |
| 173137073 (Comments: 1) | Nakaner-repair (Discussed changesets: 443) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 172966100, 172991745, 172994872, 172995552, 173052024, 173052164, 173056744, 173057048, 173057616, 173080006, 173080443, 173081440, 173081850, 173082086, 173082617, 173085621, 173086607, 173... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:10 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173052164 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:09 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173057048 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:09 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173081850 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:09 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173082086 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:09 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173056744 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:09 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 172966100 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:08 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173082617 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:08 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173093026 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:08 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173080443 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:08 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 172995552 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:08 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 172991745 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:07 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173086607 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:07 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173097934 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:07 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173080006 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:06 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173085621 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:06 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 172994872 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:06 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173057616 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:05 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173052024 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:05 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173081440 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A fea... commented 2025-10-11 13:22:05 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,352 |
| 173009718 (Comments: 3) | GatunLake (Discussed changesets: 2) | Eu moro em São Luís, mas nesse caso acho que o google street view está atualizado. commented 2025-10-11 13:13:40 UTC by Pt873 ♦53 |
| 172332855 (Comments: 2) | imulle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Habi Der Polestar Hub in Bern wird geschlossen und wird in Zukunft am Standort Münsingen in der Aaretal Garage als Teil der Carplanet Gruppe neu aufgebaut. Die Umbau-Arbeiten beginnen in den nächsten Wochen. Gruess imulle commented 2025-10-11 12:58:36 UTC by imulle ♦1 |
| 173135568 (Comments: 1) | SQ9ATK (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinn... commented 2025-10-11 12:50:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 168023728 (Comments: 1) | itr_me (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12947604721 How come this, and many other street lights are marked operator=ESB Networks ? 1. I understand that the ESB sold off its street lighting business. 2. I understand that Dublin ... commented 2025-10-11 12:47:29 UTC by VictorIE ♦946 |
| 173073388 (Comments: 3) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ja ich hatte einige hinterlegt. Ich kümmere mich um alle, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173073478. commented 2025-10-11 12:47:07 UTC by stirps ♦5 |
| 169326709 (Comments: 1) | MrValicekNR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravim, po tej cyklotrase mozu chodit aj chodci a tuto informaciu ste stratili ked ste len zmenili footway na cycleway. Opravil som. commented 2025-10-11 12:45:13 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 173073478 (Comments: 2) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ich antworte hier auch mal stellvertretend auf deine anderen Kommentare: Bei den U-Turns hatte ich auch ein bisschen Bedenken; Die wo sich die Straßen zur Kreuzung hin splitten würde ich belassen, weil es einfach nicht Sinn ergibt, dort zu... commented 2025-10-11 12:44:27 UTC by stirps ♦5 |
| 173128273 (Comments: 3) | Lully (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, merci pour la confirmation. commented 2025-10-11 12:42:15 UTC by Syl ♦993 |
| 173023412 (Comments: 3) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, The conversations about this sort of mapping are still ongoing; it's definitely worth having a look in the forum. Cheers, Andy commented 2025-10-11 12:40:58 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173131919 (Comments: 2) | ItaliA1delSole (Discussed changesets: 10) | As the hectometer signs tell, this is carriageway q of the A2 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.47351063242101&lng=5.405032087436666&z=19.05258447839492&pKey=925815374868766&focus=photo&x=0.7189064769115833&y=0.4832... commented 2025-10-11 12:30:06 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173073454 (Comments: 1) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin, auch diese Turn restrictions sind unsinn IMHO. Das es keinen Sinn macht dort zu wenden - D'accord - Aber ich sehe nicht woran du das verbot ableitest. Es stehen dort keine Schilder. Flo commented 2025-10-11 12:25:51 UTC by flohoff ♦2,384 |
| 173094803 (Comments: 2) | Ligaro Support (Discussed changesets: 3) | amenity=office verwijderd commented 2025-10-11 12:16:53 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172902854 (Comments: 2) | ZenPhil (Discussed changesets: 26) | cheers Kits that's incredibly useful, will use that commented 2025-10-11 12:08:28 UTC by ZenPhil ♦24 |
| 171904080 (Comments: 4) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 47) | Aus diesem Grund wird eigentlich verlangt, dass solche systematischen Änderungen vorher diskutiert werden. Dann wären solchen Fehlerquellen vielleicht aufgefallen. Jetzt wurden über Monate teilweise viele Tausend Objekte am Tag bearbei... commented 2025-10-11 12:04:31 UTC by milet ♦93 |
| 173081080 (Comments: 3) | josterburg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dann werde ich das mal auf "residential" ändern. Da gibt es sicher keine Einigkeit im Wiki oder Forum drüber, aber "apartments" ist für mich eher ein größeres mehrstöckiges Miethaus (wie die Nummer 2... commented 2025-10-11 12:03:27 UTC by IngoWo ♦20 |
| 173081257 (Comments: 3) | josterburg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, das macht Sinn :-) . Schliesst aber nicht aus, dass das Haus in der Klopstockstraße eine weitere Hausnummer an dem anderen Eingang hat. Da würde ich die Nummer lieber nicht an das ganze Haus packen, sondern einen separaten Node fü... commented 2025-10-11 11:58:27 UTC by IngoWo ♦20 |
| 172930411 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 27) | Omschrijvingen zoals 'kringloopwinkel' horen niet in de name-tag. De name-tag is bedoeld voor de naam zelf, dus RataPlan. commented 2025-10-11 11:57:04 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173024878 (Comments: 2) | jfd553 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for fixing the issue. I recently mapped long ridges connecting a group of peaks named Mount Saskatchewan*. I tagged them with natural=ridge and name=Monts Saskatchewan ridges. I may have inadvertently copied/pasted these values onto a fe... commented 2025-10-11 11:56:14 UTC by jfd553 ♦60 |
| 173016779 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 27) | In deze wijziging wordt het adres van het kantoor van Sweco verkeerd veranderd. Dit gebouw is Soestdijkseweg Zuid 50. Het landhuis is De Holle Bilt 22. Ik heb het hersteld. commented 2025-10-11 11:49:46 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 172618917 (Comments: 4) | RogHell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vereinheitlichen dürfte wenig Sinn ergeben solange verschiedene Varianten völlig valides Tagging darstellen: Morgen wird es schon wieder jemand anders machen. Im Nachbarort ist es wieder gelöst. usw. Ein Auswerter kommt sowieso mit ver... commented 2025-10-11 11:47:03 UTC by milet ♦93 |
| 173132837 (Comments: 1) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 37) | Źródło: https://bip.lubuskie.pl/system/obj/59309_Zalaczniki_do_uchwaly_nr_374.5329.23_zm._uchwale_ws._nadania_numerow_drogom_powiatowym_i_gminnym.pdf commented 2025-10-11 11:45:37 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 173132747 (Comments: 1) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 37) | Źródło: https://bip.lubuskie.pl/system/obj/59309_Zalaczniki_do_uchwaly_nr_374.5329.23_zm._uchwale_ws._nadania_numerow_drogom_powiatowym_i_gminnym.pdf commented 2025-10-11 11:44:27 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 172957950 (Comments: 1) | OSM-Kreis-Viersen7 (Discussed changesets: 9) | NRW iDOP Bilder zeigen das neu gebaute Haus commented 2025-10-11 11:31:40 UTC by Znaika ♦119 |
| 172506260 (Comments: 2) | JScharf (Discussed changesets: 1) | The reason I did that is actually because it’s what we call the approach. It’s mowed at a shorter height than the fairways. commented 2025-10-11 11:31:35 UTC by JScharf ♦1 |
| 173104613 (Comments: 1) | ANTOIN33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Очень странное название пляжа. Это его официальное название? Есть таблички с таким названием на местности? commented 2025-10-11 11:10:21 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦186 |
| 171104758 (Comments: 8) | JimMartin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great work! The cycling route is mapped now. If you enjoy mapping, you can check out maproulette.org, with some nice challenges. commented 2025-10-11 11:08:38 UTC by the Sandinator ♦2 |
| 173125146 (Comments: 1) | tglubenov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравейте! Може да използвате и по-новите и добри снимки на МЗХ. Ето повече инфо: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/136356 commented 2025-10-11 11:00:12 UTC by Fraxi ♦154 |
| 173106118 (Comments: 1) | Boggedy (Discussed changesets: 44) | For info this broke a couple of relations - I've fixed the ones I've found in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173131453 commented 2025-10-11 10:57:34 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173051481 (Comments: 1) | se7q38 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin se7q38, warum werden denn diese Schnittpunkte benötigt? Gruß Roger Wilco commented 2025-10-11 10:37:00 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦760 |
| 173121093 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 188) | te agrege el nuevo recorrido de la 333 osea la nueva zona que va a pasar commented 2025-10-11 10:28:54 UTC by i2004 ♦159 |
| 171880449 (Comments: 2) | Box4ll (Discussed changesets: 1) | vielen Dank :) Ich versuche es besser nächtes Mal zu machen. commented 2025-10-11 10:19:38 UTC by AasOsloNorge ♦1 |
| 173065103 (Comments: 1) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 21) | и зачем вы это сделали? это торговый центр, значит земля используется для торговли commented 2025-10-11 10:17:27 UTC by literan ♦6,831 |
| 173129349 (Comments: 1) | Olixelo (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-11 10:00:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172678315 (Comments: 3) | Cèparlà (Discussed changesets: 8) | Effectivement c'est en partie visible sur l'ortho 2022. L'aménagement est bien tordu, une fois en piste une fois en bande, une fois derrière le trottoir. Ça ne ressemble pas à un aménagement qualitati... commented 2025-10-11 09:59:37 UTC by Gonéo ♦238 |
| 173125239 (Comments: 1) | chiche (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравейте! Бихте могли да добавите таг за самия бизнес. commented 2025-10-11 09:56:59 UTC by Fraxi ♦154 |
| 161907218 (Comments: 3) | tbiondo (Discussed changesets: 1) | interessante, non lo sapevo commented 2025-10-11 09:53:05 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦100 |
| 171265474 (Comments: 3) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 89) | scusami commented 2025-10-11 09:52:04 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦100 |
| 173128902 (Comments: 1) | Kamirol (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-10-11 09:50:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173128843 (Comments: 1) | Taksine (Discussed changesets: 33) | 这两个POI不大准确，它们不是废墟，故进行修改。 commented 2025-10-11 09:46:13 UTC by Taksine ♦112 |
| 173066952 (Comments: 1) | Bobropiton (Discussed changesets: 61) | так это же deprecated тег https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=facility?uselang=ru commented 2025-10-11 09:41:37 UTC by literan ♦6,831 |
| 173065761 (Comments: 4) | TRWFacty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Módosításcsomag visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173127801 commented 2025-10-11 09:18:01 UTC by infeeeee ♦592 |
| 101907160 (Comments: 1) | cartomatto (Discussed changesets: 32) | Non mettere Rudere come valore del name. Non è un nome proprio. Altrimenti daremmo il nome panchina a tutte le panchine. Così pure ruins per building non va se guardi la wiki. Ho messo abandoned:building=yes commented 2025-10-11 09:13:00 UTC by canfe ♦1,136 |
| 173093048 (Comments: 1) | OurtheCanal (Discussed changesets: 3) | Footway bridge has been demolished in July. It was also removed from the map at that point. I reverted this changeset. commented 2025-10-11 09:11:51 UTC by Buraddo ♦148 |
| 173105576 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Nie zmieniaj tego, co jest dobrze wpisane. Numer przystanku jest wzięty z oficjalnych danych ZTP w Krakowie, to raz, a dwa, zgodnie z odpowiednimi przepisami przystanek po tej stronie ulicy musi być parzysty. Numer ref z czapy nie jest. commented 2025-10-11 08:50:40 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦37 |
| 173049358 (Comments: 2) | Jorge Valencia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, thank for the advice commented 2025-10-11 08:49:36 UTC by JorgeV ♦1 |
| 173065336 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436754424 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13205411757 I've changed the site to landuse=religious and the shrine to historic=wayside_shrine (unfortunately there isn't a better tag at... commented 2025-10-11 08:41:40 UTC by VictorIE ♦946 |
| 172557025 (Comments: 1) | chrsmsk (Discussed changesets: 19) | Way 1433715426: Richtig wäre hier: abandoned:highway=path commented 2025-10-11 08:36:15 UTC by martinst ♦333 |
| 173124616 (Comments: 3) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 342) | Super :-) Jeg lavet en forespørgsel hvor jeg henviste til denne kryds og dig https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dynamiske-ruderanlaeg/136716 commented 2025-10-11 08:36:05 UTC by LarsBG ♦79 |
| 173122009 (Comments: 1) | Benecke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page: https://wi... commented 2025-10-11 08:33:39 UTC by Sandal man ♦395 |
| 173126056 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-11 08:30:56 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173124649 (Comments: 6) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 8) | De foutmelding kwam omdat een verbindingsnode met de gebouwomtrekken ontbrak midden in het gebouw. Dat bestaat uit twee delen. Ik heb het aangepast. commented 2025-10-11 08:29:57 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173069643 (Comments: 2) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | access=conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 29-2025 Dec 19) toegevoegd Construction verwijderd. Na datum gaat de weg automatisch weer open. Svp geen construction taggen voor 'korte' periodes. De routering raakt anders zoek. MV... commented 2025-10-11 08:25:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173088279 (Comments: 3) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 96) | Wydawało mi się, że było napisane, że stosuje się to jako całościowy prefix we wszystkich tagach podobiektu, więc się nie upewniałem już w wiki. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. JOSM niestety nie pokazuje tego szablonu domyślnie. <... commented 2025-10-11 08:11:40 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦252 |
 | 172970189 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969846 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969750 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173024866 (Comments: 2) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172970161 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172971995 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172972069 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172972522 (Comments: 4) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172971971 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969637 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969547 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969417 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969324 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238 commented 2025-10-11 08:01:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968970 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968996 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969011 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968879 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969237 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968802 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968782 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968690 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969263 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172969281 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968622 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968547 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968524 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968097 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968112 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
 | 172968156 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968190 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968257 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968274 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968309 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968355 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968429 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968449 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968499 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968002 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968038 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172968055 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967939 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205 commented 2025-10-11 07:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173115544 (Comments: 7) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Paar keer CTRL-F5 (cache leegmaken) om het effect te zien. commented 2025-10-11 07:57:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172967831 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967785 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967668 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967879 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967769 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967722 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967896 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967922 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967862 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967634 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967532 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967498 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967605 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967574 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172967557 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138 commented 2025-10-11 07:57:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 167167295 (Comments: 3) | Honzaiky (Discussed changesets: 3) | Díky za upozornění a opravu. Asi jsem to opomněl přetagovat... 🤔 commented 2025-10-11 07:38:15 UTC by Honzaiky ♦3 |
| 173079290 (Comments: 1) | adrianbmw (Discussed changesets: 5) | There is no such element on the ground. commented 2025-10-11 07:34:12 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦15 |
 | 173100804 (Comments: 1) | bitcoin chalchuapa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-11 07:01:09 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 150911474 (Comments: 2) | Layft Greater (Discussed changesets: 57) | Yes, these are residential. There are some categories vehicles that can access those streets TotG applies. commented 2025-10-11 06:55:41 UTC by Layft Greater ♦175 |
| 160474802 (Comments: 1) | Carlo Melito (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sarà un errore perché non mi pare ci sia un bar in mezzo alla strada ;) commented 2025-10-11 06:54:45 UTC by baprischka ♦29 |
| 173005407 (Comments: 2) | GatunLake (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá Pt873, obrigado por entrar em contato. Vou me ater às suas edições. Tradução automática Hi Pt873, thank you for reaching out, I will defer to your edits. commented 2025-10-11 06:49:55 UTC by GatunLake ♦2 |
| 133616306 (Comments: 3) | Gruemscheler (Discussed changesets: 3) | ich dachte an "to be continued" oder "to be checked". Bei der Variante continued, hätte ich mich gefragt, in welche Richtung überhaupt verlängert werden soll, da an beiden Enden die Wege bereits weitergezeichnet sin... commented 2025-10-11 06:45:39 UTC by Piagno ♦108 |
| 173099218 (Comments: 1) | Haags Happie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-11 06:44:44 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173121014 (Comments: 1) | ajyong (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please use the key highway for streets, not to repeat the information of addr:street. commented 2025-10-11 06:33:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173121139 (Comments: 1) | ajyong (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please do not add “building” to the plot if there is a building anywhere. Draw the individual buildings. commented 2025-10-11 06:24:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173114847 (Comments: 2) | Rene1974 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Je edits om nog ens na te lopen.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173114847 commented 2025-10-11 06:20:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 125951444 (Comments: 1) | Vonter (Discussed changesets: 28) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092941900 this drain is not visible in aerials, is it underground ? or is it outdated info ? commented 2025-10-11 06:08:45 UTC by TheLNL ♦9 |
| 173070503 (Comments: 5) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | Het stukje fietspad tussen v Heeswijkstraat 81 87 moet wel oneway=no zijn, want anders is geen fietsroutering mogelijk. Dat zijstraatje komt uit op een doorgetrokken streep. Check mijn wijzigingen svp, maar als je iets weer wil veranderen nee... commented 2025-10-11 06:06:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 125248093 (Comments: 3) | urbalazs (Discussed changesets: 51) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-10-11 05:34:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 173069538 (Comments: 2) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | reverted by changeset #173121562 commented 2025-10-11 05:21:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173070313 (Comments: 1) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | RR Hoe kom je van de Horst als fietser naar de Van Heeswijskstraat? Je komt een oneway=yes fietspad tegen. Hier klopt het e.e.a. niet. Ga eens op een fiets zitten in gedachten en probeer dat eens uit en kijk dan naar de tagging van de paden.... commented 2025-10-11 05:15:18 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 110884484 (Comments: 1) | maxerickson (Discussed changesets: 32) | Looks like the address 1207 is for the Post Office to the East, while 1189 is the Gas Station. commented 2025-10-11 05:14:55 UTC by Kovirii ♦37 |
| 173121308 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM6 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Good Changesat --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173121308 commented 2025-10-11 05:09:37 UTC by Kovirii ♦37 |
| 173102655 (Comments: 1) | Lost in Time and Space (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for adding this. It looks like you might have missed a digit on the phone number though. Can you double check and fix it? Thanks commented 2025-10-11 04:13:39 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦342 |
| 172898050 (Comments: 2) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 104) | "tagowanie jako wojewódzkiej na tym odcinku wystarczy" highway=secondary nie oznacza że to droga wojewódzka skąd ten pomysł? commented 2025-10-11 04:02:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 146091444 (Comments: 1) | atsialiak_lyft (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you for adding the roads and their names! :) commented 2025-10-11 04:00:06 UTC by Kovirii ♦37 |
| 141983019 (Comments: 3) | twz123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | sounds like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility with some extra tags would fit? Or maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office ? commented 2025-10-11 03:44:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 173045181 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | The filter roads at 38.851669,21.336762 were removed because Esri World Imagery disproves its existence. What is the source for all those filter roads you've added? commented 2025-10-11 03:31:39 UTC by ika-chan! ♦288 |
| 162500409 (Comments: 4) | tyr_asd (Discussed changesets: 49) | shop = group_of_vending_machines (?????) commented 2025-10-11 03:27:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 111666009 (Comments: 3) | AndersAndersson (Discussed changesets: 150) | thanks for answering! I asked for clarification as some other restaurants where I asked such question turned out to not stock wider supply of products, only some specialty food (so restaurant selling also say wine/jam of own production/etc). |
| 171194154 (Comments: 7) | nick-28 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Still, what is the point and meaning of house=residential ? what this tag adds? have you used it to note that this specific house is used for residential purposes? (rather than abandoned or repurposed) commented 2025-10-11 03:17:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 173118199 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 541) | chodzi o skasowanie nieistniejącej lampy, nie łącznik commented 2025-10-11 03:05:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 173118264 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 541) | prawdziwe źródło: Geoportal commented 2025-10-11 03:04:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 171700679 (Comments: 1) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please don't use roads as boundary members. This changeset connected a tunnel to the road that crosses it. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171700679<... commented 2025-10-11 03:04:29 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 173096578 (Comments: 1) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please, will you please stop adding junction layouts that do not exist in real life, like what you did at 38.413403,22.838091 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436929596? Please explain why are you continuing to add non-existent junction ... commented 2025-10-11 02:55:14 UTC by ika-chan! ♦288 |
| 173078061 (Comments: 1) | Emilio L (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, please, don't delete a hotel node and add its info to the hotel building. The hotel is not only the building, it's the whole grounds. Tag the whole grounds as landuse=commercial, the building as building=hotel, and keep the info on the ... commented 2025-10-11 01:45:59 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 171429569 (Comments: 1) | Canyon Runner (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, Could you confirm where you got the shape for the park from? It looks like it came from the county tax parcels, which is an acceptable source, but I just want to confirm before adding it to the source tag. commented 2025-10-11 01:44:55 UTC by ZLima12 ♦261 |
| 173117413 (Comments: 1) | imadmajor (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, merci de ne pas ajouter des résidences en utilisant le tag tourism=apartment. Comme tu peux le lire sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=apartment, ce tag est en réalité pour les appartements à la l... commented 2025-10-11 01:43:59 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 173116934 (Comments: 1) | wordbird (Discussed changesets: 8) | (an attempt to correct relations / land cover not displaying in area) commented 2025-10-11 01:08:17 UTC by wordbird ♦9 |
| 172984985 (Comments: 2) | Dmitry747 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2025-10-11 00:45:23 UTC by Dmitry747 ♦1 |
| 168287495 (Comments: 1) | Brareu68 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Why did you move Big River Isuzu, Nissan and Toyota? commented 2025-10-11 00:45:08 UTC by digistrorf ♦6 |
| 171951141 (Comments: 1) | Carlos244 (Discussed changesets: 1) | bridges should not connect to roads they cross commented 2025-10-11 00:28:51 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 122841770 (Comments: 1) | slymarekivan (Discussed changesets: 30) | Zdravim. Ked mate vodu v tuneli pod zemou s layer=-1, nie su cesty nad nou mostami. A naozaj tam ta Jelsina tecie pod zemou? A ako moze mat dalsi pritok z pola s rovnakym nazvom? commented 2025-10-11 00:09:40 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 168223516 (Comments: 1) | David Kříž (Discussed changesets: 18) | Dakujem, chapem co ste tu chceli dosiahnut, ale len dokreslenim jednej cesty to nevyriesite. Bolo treba este spravne znizit spravne pocet jazdnych pruhov na ceste 513, z ktorej ste oddelili novy odbocovaci pruh (nestaci len zmenit na lanes=2, ... commented 2025-10-11 00:07:31 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 170698007 (Comments: 1) | sovereign_linhktg (Discussed changesets: 30) | Fake bridge --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170698007 commented 2025-10-10 23:51:18 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 171398116 (Comments: 2) | Arpit_agg (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173116544 commented 2025-10-10 23:44:48 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 173014245 (Comments: 1) | sakudo (Discussed changesets: 12) | Not a fix --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173014245 commented 2025-10-10 23:38:39 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 173027664 (Comments: 4) | Jman12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cool project. Thanks! By poking around I found also this one, but its data hasn't been updated in a year. https://osmcamera.dihe.de/ commented 2025-10-10 23:27:39 UTC by Mashin ♦576 |
| 173081379 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 262) | Dakujem, celkom dobre, len usek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436755528 nema mat 3 jazdne pruhy ale len 2, kedze odbocovaci pruh este nema plnu sirku. commented 2025-10-10 23:25:58 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 172984196 (Comments: 1) | Dmitry747 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Awesome, thanks for the edit! Based on aerial imagery, it looks like that 3rd lane is a center turn lane, like it is south of the segment you edited. I added some more tags to indicate a center lane, but let me know if that's not the case anymor... commented 2025-10-10 23:24:35 UTC by pwbriggs ♦76 |
| 173070480 (Comments: 1) | VeryFakeName (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Reverted for fake ... commented 2025-10-10 23:23:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173068501 (Comments: 1) | ljhljh235 (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, if you switch to the ESRI World imagery, you can see one completed house and the construction of another. Just select the background icon in the editor and select the ESRI World imagery. --- Publishe... commented 2025-10-10 23:18:24 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 165128407 (Comments: 1) | Henten Človek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zdravim, preco je ten chodnik na moste tvoreny 5 usekmi, ked maju vsetky rovnake vlastnosti? Stacil by jeden. commented 2025-10-10 23:09:39 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
 | 100000000 (Comments: 134) | Lamine Ndiaye (Discussed changesets: 10) | close to 1 billion? commented 2025-10-10 23:02:49 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 1000000 (Comments: 5) | nin2jardin (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1m commented 2025-10-10 23:00:57 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 67 (Comments: 1) | zool (Discussed changesets: 6) | 67 commented 2025-10-10 22:59:49 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 172968840 (Comments: 1) | Geopublisher (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do you have more information about this? The road signs are "Tuna-Hästberg". The official mapping authority are also spelling it that way. commented 2025-10-10 22:59:27 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦616 |
| 69 (Comments: 6) | zool (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nice commented 2025-10-10 22:58:58 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 420 (Comments: 2) | Welshie (Discussed changesets: 84) | nice number commented 2025-10-10 22:58:14 UTC by likeToTravel ♦5 |
| 171739146 (Comments: 1) | krzysztofedycje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jeśli ciągi piesze przecinają się z drogami, dajemy punkt na ich przecięciu. Nie nakładamy linii na siebie bez przecięć. Kolejna sprawa to przejście dla pieszych z wyspą, które było poprawnie naniesione. Na tym przejściu, rozdz... commented 2025-10-10 22:57:15 UTC by olo81 ♦687 |
| 173112701 (Comments: 1) | qumil (Discussed changesets: 61) | Nie wiem jak skomplikowana była ta przebudowa ale ta edycja wygląda na całkowicie błędną. Poprawiłem skrzyżowanie wg danych w BDOT, które wyglądają na podobne do Twojej edycji. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173115287... commented 2025-10-10 22:33:50 UTC by Marek-M ♦942 |
| 170131844 (Comments: 2) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 85) | Thanks for letting me know! commented 2025-10-10 22:15:57 UTC by b-jazz ♦734 |
| 173112030 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-10 21:42:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173110893 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-10 21:42:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 101594545 (Comments: 1) | Florek89 (Discussed changesets: 39) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4945061 Mam wątpliwości co do uwagi, bo brzmi jak nazwa opisowa, ale jak piszesz, że na pewno poprawne to podrzucam, bo może jesteś w stanie to potwierdzić/zaprzeczyć. commented 2025-10-10 21:35:36 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,148 |
| 149713420 (Comments: 1) | jakTTU2020 (Discussed changesets: 32) | names aren't refs; there's no reason to duplicate the description of a route relation to the name (and misleading since some routes do have names). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2025-10-10 20:50:00 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,183 |
| 165152434 (Comments: 2) | Srdjan023 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Обзиром да се указани проблем игнорише неколико недеља, а од старта није испоштована предвиђена процедура јавне расправе пре импортова... commented 2025-10-10 20:43:26 UTC by brdrsrsu ♦6 |
| 173111864 (Comments: 1) | Maperooney (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi.. I merged your info wth the present addressnode. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-10 20:33:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173111646 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 11) | Note: more than 7 mapwithai-derived features in this changeset. The JOSM plugin had trouble with tags when uploading to an existing changeset. commented 2025-10-10 20:29:27 UTC by pwbriggs ♦76 |
| 170747221 (Comments: 2) | Cèparlà (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, effectivement sur cette zone les vitesses dont très mal indiquées . Le pont est bien a 50km/h. Voilà qui est mis à jour! Cordialement commented 2025-10-10 20:24:41 UTC by Cèparlà ♦6 |
| 173026260 (Comments: 2) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thank you for your comments. I'll review them in detail and, if necessary, reverse them. Best regards. commented 2025-10-10 20:16:01 UTC by Leonardo Gutierrez ♦18 |
| 173105319 (Comments: 1) | Fresno99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/6885165759, https://www.osm.org/node/11365101510more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the nodes back to the original position. commented 2025-10-10 20:11:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173109598 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Po raz kolejny: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-10 20:03:01 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
| 173110065 (Comments: 2) | VolkanAykul (Discussed changesets: 2) | Geçmiş değişikliklerinizi incelerken aynı yeri geçmişte de sildiğinizi gördüm. İlgili değişikliğiniz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113778965 O değişikliğinizde de tarafınıza "Map what'... commented 2025-10-10 20:02:34 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 168978215 (Comments: 2) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Patrząc na to, co ten użytkownik tworzy, to pewnie nie jest to ulica Żołnierska... commented 2025-10-10 20:02:29 UTC by YomanNH ♦363 |
| 173107544 (Comments: 1) | John Sobiech (Discussed changesets: 1) | You only added a website and description to an address node, but did not note that there is also a business there. And no, website and description isn't engouh. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://w... commented 2025-10-10 20:01:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173110340 (Comments: 1) | Djann (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep Gelukt! oneway=no is trouwens default en hoef je niet te taggen. Hier is het wellicht verstandig om het te laten staan. Dat voorkomt dat een medemapper er weet oneway=yes van maakt. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 20:00:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173110801 (Comments: 1) | Harperrxx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Did you see this area: https://www.osm.org/way/145614349. I assume you create duplicate information. commented 2025-10-10 19:57:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172703284 (Comments: 1) | ehrm (Discussed changesets: 1) | While this is an unregistered slum, it's been given a xenophobic colloquial name as political propaganda and has made its way here on OSM data. This needs to be changed to something more generic and less hateful. commented 2025-10-10 19:56:54 UTC by ehrm ♦1 |
| 173109780 (Comments: 1) | Dmitriy Mozgo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Что это за название такое интересное? :) commented 2025-10-10 19:44:46 UTC by HantDX ♦28 |
| 173109609 (Comments: 1) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-10 19:41:23 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173110584 (Comments: 1) | Thibault Rommel (Discussed changesets: 52) | *update omgeving Sint-Jozefskerk commented 2025-10-10 19:38:37 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦81 |
| 173082985 (Comments: 1) | ithianm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, una «Plazoleta de Eventos» no es un centro ecuestre (leisure=horse_riding). ¿Es un edificio? ¿Quizás algo como https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building=grandstand o https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... commented 2025-10-10 19:37:47 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦823 |
| 172916173 (Comments: 3) | Paul-François (Discussed changesets: 2) | On est d'accord. Raison de plus de considérer les halles des années 60 comme un bâtiment en construction et onn comme des halles sans horaires d'ouverture, ce n'est pas juste de la peinture ! commented 2025-10-10 19:25:58 UTC by trial ♦942 |
| 173109214 (Comments: 3) | Djann (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep gewoon in dat stukje de regels verwijderen. iD is een lastige editor soms. Die maakt anders van no>yes. Dus alle tags zichtbaar kiezen en dan de regels verwijderen van de tweewielers. Succes, eggie commented 2025-10-10 19:24:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173091789 (Comments: 2) | mampir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не е нарочно :) Моята програма OsmAnd~ ги изтри, без да ме пита. Ще ги оправя. commented 2025-10-10 19:20:13 UTC by mampir ♦1 |
 | 173086560 (Comments: 1) | Administration Communale de Kehlen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moien, a wëlkomm op OpenStreetMap! Ech wënschen Iech vill Erfolleg a Spaass beim Mappen an Ärer Gemeng. BG commented 2025-10-10 19:10:54 UTC by Stereo ♦360 |
| 173108125 (Comments: 1) | DKlaasen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag DKlaasen, Wellicht beter highway=footway gebruiken. pedestrian gebruiken we voor voetgangersgebieden.. Bv in winkelgebieden. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 19:09:56 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173103951 (Comments: 1) | Reine-claude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci pour la mise à jour. Tu as demandé une revue pour le changeset. D'après le wiki tu pourrais ajouter cycleway:left:lane=pictogram s'il y a des pictos vélo pour rappeler le double-sens cyclable. commented 2025-10-10 18:58:01 UTC by Gonéo ♦238 |
| 172762310 (Comments: 1) | roozbehetech (Discussed changesets: 1) | خدمات سیم پیچی الکتروموتور و ژنراتور commented 2025-10-10 18:55:14 UTC by roozbehetech ♦1 |
| 172998439 (Comments: 1) | pidugu konda reddy (Discussed changesets: 783) | Hi Pidugu, just a tip—no need to include your bio (or arguably, data sources) in your changset comment—that's what the bio of your OSM profile and the Source field of the changeset are for, respectively (and neither of which contains... commented 2025-10-10 18:45:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦47 |
| 173093144 (Comments: 1) | mixdm (Discussed changesets: 17) | это мой дом commented 2025-10-10 18:41:32 UTC by CibAG ♦1 |
| 170123370 (Comments: 2) | icaro98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ご指摘ありがとうございます。 早急に確認いたします。 なお、メールチェックを怠り返答が遅くなってしまいました。失礼いたしました。 commented 2025-10-10 18:39:42 UTC by icaro98 ♦1 |
| 173052397 (Comments: 1) | paulhell (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for updating the dentist closure, you dropped the building tag so I've restored that back. Cheers, Alex commented 2025-10-10 18:25:20 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦101 |
| 173096805 (Comments: 1) | MF20AC (Discussed changesets: 2) | na przyszłość, nie łącz granic ewidencyjnych z drogami commented 2025-10-10 18:24:11 UTC by Yog Sot ♦316 |
| 173052776 (Comments: 1) | paulhell (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. A useful bit of history, I recognise Meads name from the Wilton Court Hotel he also funded. commented 2025-10-10 18:21:24 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦101 |
| 173098649 (Comments: 2) | emoerup (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello Frans S Thanks for your feedback. I was concentrating on the residential area. I saw that the buildings were not mapped. But I thought it was ok, and didn't try to see if I had access to map them. Kind regards Erik - em... commented 2025-10-10 18:15:52 UTC by emoerup ♦4 |
| 173047537 (Comments: 3) | jumplondon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I posted a thread on the community forum to continue this discussion - it raises enough questions that I don't think the comments section of the changeset can be a productive place to discuss them or document the answers. https://community.... commented 2025-10-10 17:59:47 UTC by jumplondon ♦1 |
| 172882578 (Comments: 5) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 608) | @Philet2137 >Tu chodzi o stan formalny. W OSM construction dotyczy stanu w terenie, bo też jest to podstawowa zasada OSM. @voltairovicz: "Ale tu nie chodzi o to, żeby chodzić teraz po budowie" Nie trzeba ch... commented 2025-10-10 17:57:59 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,309 |
| 173106581 (Comments: 1) | Donnut (Discussed changesets: 1) | This change I made is wrong. I thought the mosque was bigger, but the additional area is the square in front of the mosque. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173106581 ... commented 2025-10-10 17:52:19 UTC by Donnut ♦1 |
 | 169906176 (Comments: 4) | FouadYammine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reproducing seeds is the main activity of this farm. But I didnt find even the regular 'farm' type. commented 2025-10-10 17:51:51 UTC by FouadYammine ♦1 |
| 172880593 (Comments: 5) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 127) | Nie wykluczam, że na Skyscrapercity masz wątek poświęcony LK372, trzeba poszukać commented 2025-10-10 17:48:47 UTC by Anas masuris ♦136 |
| 173104433 (Comments: 6) | prinshoek (Discussed changesets: 2) | keurig commented 2025-10-10 17:47:21 UTC by prinshoek ♦1 |
| 173100658 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ya un signe où il y a écrit rue aeria sport ? commented 2025-10-10 17:44:25 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 173097509 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 31) | И добавен intermittent=yes към поток в другия край на държавата :). commented 2025-10-10 17:39:42 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 173086509 (Comments: 2) | geow (Discussed changesets: 46) | Danke, sehr aufmerksam 🖖 Fast alles richtig gemacht Locker sind nicht mein Spezialgebiet 😉Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker ist zur Referenzieung auch noch die PLZ erforderlich. commented 2025-10-10 17:37:50 UTC by geow ♦450 |
| 173055985 (Comments: 3) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Правилно помня, в рамките на околовръстното е забранено да се движат каруци. Неофициално знаем какво е положението, не мисля че има нужда... commented 2025-10-10 17:37:39 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 173105615 (Comments: 1) | bandsonly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. "Ek Kütüphane Binası" olarak adlandırdığınız bina uydu görüntülerinde görünmüyor. Doğru yere eklediğinize emin misiniz?Bu bina yeni mi inşa edildi? commented 2025-10-10 17:36:26 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172295508 (Comments: 10) | cyganka (Discussed changesets: 79) | no, stan ma istotne znaczenie jak w 1940 istniała droga, w 2040 będzie droga a teraz jest ścieżka, to do zmapowania w OSM jest ścieżka commented 2025-10-10 17:28:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 172883446 (Comments: 3) | gscscnd (Discussed changesets: 26) | Dzięki za błyskawiczną poprawę :) commented 2025-10-10 17:25:11 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦747 |
| 173101757 (Comments: 1) | Tordem (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Burada gerçekten bir anıt var mı? Yoksa, mola noktanızı kaydetmek isterken yanlışlıkla mı oluşturdunuz? Hello. Is there really a monument here? Or did you create it by mistake while trying to save your rest stop point?... commented 2025-10-10 17:21:37 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173097845 (Comments: 1) | chiche (Discussed changesets: 3) | Адреса на блока е отбелязан върху самата сграда, не е необходимо да го дублирате. commented 2025-10-10 17:17:23 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 173090507 (Comments: 1) | operation_mogul (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128702266... commented 2025-10-10 17:14:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173093790 (Comments: 5) | madu21 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436917795<... commented 2025-10-10 17:14:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173099053 (Comments: 2) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 6) | 👍 commented 2025-10-10 17:13:46 UTC by notabear ♦2 |
| 173099511 (Comments: 1) | technician_lyft (Discussed changesets: 15) | thank you so much for this commented 2025-10-10 17:09:18 UTC by Udarian ♦497 |
| 172382342 (Comments: 3) | DOMGG (Discussed changesets: 5) | Proszę: https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/ Zdjęcia są wykonywane co kilka dni. Oczywiście czasem są chmury i nic nie widać. commented 2025-10-10 17:02:42 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,309 |
| 172963782 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | ciao Bibo, anche qui vale la stessa cosa, sono tutti doppioni, le stazioni sono già mappati da tanti anni... commented 2025-10-10 16:56:31 UTC by dieterdreist ♦863 |
| 172883066 (Comments: 1) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 608) | Czy w ogóle jest sens dodawać takie rwane fragmenciki construction? Moim zdaniem lepiej poczekać, aż budowa się rozkręci i dodać całość. Aktualność czegoś takiego wynosi max kilka dni. Póki co mieliśmy pochmurne dni, zapewn... commented 2025-10-10 16:53:43 UTC by voltairovicz ♦217 |
| 169922971 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 37) | I have blocked you commented 2025-10-10 16:47:44 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 172865470 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 37) | Nie będę się rozpisywać przy 4 zmianach. commented 2025-10-10 16:45:23 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 172915045 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 37) | Było przedyskutowane na Discordzie polskiej społeczności OSM - ta droga ma mieć primary, ponieważ nie powinno zostawiać się luk w primary. Routery też biora penalty za zmainę z primary na secondary. commented 2025-10-10 16:44:08 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 169801349 (Comments: 3) | achyutha (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the explanation! I have reverted this changeset, effectively restoring the alley as it was before. This way, the history is preserved. Feel free to reclassify it as a footpath based on your verification and resources. https://www.op... commented 2025-10-10 16:32:00 UTC by cuzi ♦128 |
| 172829171 (Comments: 3) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 180) | Cześć, dzięki za dokładne sprawdzenie mojej edycji - zdarzają mi się (jak każdemu) błędy :) Co do pierwszego to tak, faktycznie iD mi zmieniło w ostatniej chwili kolejność podpowiedzi. Co do punktów kontroli, to przy... commented 2025-10-10 16:28:44 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦747 |
| 173099381 (Comments: 1) | notabear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag notabear, Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode en één fast food verwijderd op hetzelfde punt. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 15:54:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173099012 (Comments: 1) | Haags Happie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Gebruik svp Deprecated. Use currency:XBT=* ipv https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:bitcoin MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 15:50:22 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172801849 (Comments: 2) | Comenald (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der kommentierte Pfad ist tatsächlich auch auf dem Luftbild zu sehen. Allgemeiner hatte ich mir zu dem Zeitpunkt folgendes dabei gedacht: - wahrscheinlich ist mehr richtig als falsch und ich erziele damit in Summe eine Verbesserung - die A... commented 2025-10-10 15:47:00 UTC by Comenald ♦1 |
| 173096460 (Comments: 1) | Maperooney (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-10 15:46:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 150008448 (Comments: 1) | EnumMapper (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hello EnumMapper, I see that you added a bunch of sidewalks to the map. However in many places they are not connected to the other sidewalks and the roads around them. This makes it so that routers send pedestrians along unnecessary detours (e... commented 2025-10-10 15:27:54 UTC by draconic_mapper ♦2 |
 | 172039895 (Comments: 2) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 96) | South Korea uses the junction names to describe the located area. ¿Why can't North Korea do the same? commented 2025-10-10 15:06:38 UTC by BigKev97 ♦83 |
| 173060807 (Comments: 3) | Ozon OSM16 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Спасибо. commented 2025-10-10 15:01:10 UTC by mavl ♦76,131 |
| 41662747 (Comments: 5) | brunfbart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Datensatz fällt (zumindest 9 Jahre später) nicht unter die Erklärung der Website, sondern wird über die Seite als "OpenData" unter CC BY 4.0 zur Verfügung gestellt, etwa hier: https://www.bast.de/DE/Publikatione... commented 2025-10-10 14:51:35 UTC by x a ♦9 |
| 173098778 (Comments: 1) | aktivnutzer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nachsatz: es gibt keine ausgeschilderte Beschränkung. commented 2025-10-10 14:50:56 UTC by aktivnutzer ♦3 |
| 173091456 (Comments: 1) | 454962315 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists ... commented 2025-10-10 14:45:05 UTC by MassCartog ♦191 |
| 173097033 (Comments: 1) | asitambuke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo asitambuke, abgerissene Gebäude sollten lieber mit `demolished:building=...` getaggt werden, statt sie zu entfernen. Das Gebäude wird dann nicht mehr gerendert und es verhindert, dass andere Mapper ein Gebäude auf Basis vo... commented 2025-10-10 14:41:58 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦29 |
| 173082085 (Comments: 1) | Mehmet KERİMOĞLU (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bu ağaçlandırma sahalarının gerçekten bir adı var mı? Yoksa siz ad boş kalmasın diye mi yazdınız? Adı yoksa name=* etiketi boş kalmalı. Burası henüz ağaçlandırılmadı ise alanı çizmeniz de do... commented 2025-10-10 14:32:54 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 170424539 (Comments: 1) | Emilio L (Discussed changesets: 12) | A commercially used area is not a building. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial commented 2025-10-10 14:30:07 UTC by Papa-online ♦28 |
| 173067180 (Comments: 2) | tday44 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I went ahead and tried fixing this up for you... took some searching along the road to find the compacted gravel section, and added asphalt as the surface to the paved parts. Made a multipolygon to create an outline for the picnic area. ... commented 2025-10-10 14:25:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,183 |
| 173092507 (Comments: 1) | Jerzy Jeżewski (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-10 14:14:29 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173096900 (Comments: 1) | Nadja15 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Se denna kartanteckning för motivation till varför jag ändrade tillbaka: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4966142 commented 2025-10-10 14:08:50 UTC by Nadja15 ♦15 |
| 173072169 (Comments: 1) | DLoop (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks like you added the address to the road, I added the transfer building and put it on that. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173072169 commented 2025-10-10 14:01:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,183 |
 | 160619491 (Comments: 2) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 96) | Error del nombre de apellido. commented 2025-10-10 13:58:17 UTC by BigKev97 ♦83 |
| 169087230 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Aweech! My name is Sumit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft and Lalit’s Teammate. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Yes, you are right, in this case Lyft-owned aerial imagery is outdated. I apologize for the incorr... commented 2025-10-10 13:57:30 UTC by skumarchandela_lyft ♦11 |
| 173043349 (Comments: 2) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, Udarian My name is Shubham and I’m Ravinder’s teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your feedback. Regarding my edits: I classified the way as residential because it appeared to be located at the front ... commented 2025-10-10 13:43:41 UTC by subham_lyft ♦3 |
| 173038779 (Comments: 2) | subham_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Udarian My name is Shubham and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. About my edits: The recent road I added is supported by Lyft-owned aerial imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N_bsXbrxEU537l_SPqjFZwZ8-S-u2OX3/view?usp=sharing) ... commented 2025-10-10 13:27:19 UTC by subham_lyft ♦3 |
| 130124891 (Comments: 2) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 78) | Merci pour les suggestions. J'ai fait les modifs, mais j'ai retenu brand=Mouvement Emmaüs suggéré par iD et plus fréquent. N'hésite pas à faire ce type de modification par toi-même !<... commented 2025-10-10 13:27:02 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,155 |
| 173045937 (Comments: 2) | Map User Grecce (Discussed changesets: 12) | Sorry, but I also forgot to mention my concern about fake junction layouts as well. The DWG has asked us to try and urge you change your editing practices, but this is something that I cannot handle alone due to so many real life issues. commented 2025-10-10 13:24:40 UTC by ika-chan! ♦288 |
| 172118369 (Comments: 1) | syahmin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. There is no need to map paths leading to buildings which can be seen from the through going highway. (and they are no unclassified highways) Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-10-10 13:22:36 UTC by Frans S ♦9,909 |
| 173094534 (Comments: 1) | SoulCover (Discussed changesets: 1) | source=survey;aerial imagery commented 2025-10-10 13:14:31 UTC by SoulCover ♦1 |
| 173092422 (Comments: 1) | cMartin (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ich nochmal :) ich seh grad, dass du den Schlüssel "design" einsetzt. Dieser ist im Wiki dokumentiert, jedoch als Zusatz für Strommasten, weshalb ich ihn in diesem Zusammenhang nicht nutzen würde. https://wik... commented 2025-10-10 13:08:00 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,636 |
| 173076003 (Comments: 1) | Roberitzy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Está corrcta esta edición? el local se cambió de dirección? porque cambió el nombre de la calle y la numeración, pero el punto quedó donde mismo. saludos commented 2025-10-10 13:06:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 173092491 (Comments: 2) | Gerstbroodje (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wel spatie in postcode verwijderd commented 2025-10-10 13:04:52 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173043543 (Comments: 4) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 13) | In Quebec, when we validate and complete the data in a specific area like this one, we are adding very precise data, so very short segments are often created. This is not an error. Thanks! commented 2025-10-10 13:02:47 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦429 |
| 173085507 (Comments: 5) | GeoBash (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thx, Conform je beschrijving ingetekend. commented 2025-10-10 13:01:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173091540 (Comments: 1) | cMartin (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi :) im Forum wurde zuletzt etwas über MTB-Trails diskutiert und wie wir sie erfassen wollen. Noch sind wir uns nicht einig, jedoch habe ich die Diskussionen so interpretiert, dass diese Strecken nicht als "highway=cycleway" er... commented 2025-10-10 12:53:26 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,636 |
| 173089115 (Comments: 1) | thehighfliers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You business isn't part of a boundary! I revert you r SPAM entry. see https://www.osm.org/changeset/173093506 commented 2025-10-10 12:51:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172124147 (Comments: 1) | Sharon Orengo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please tag the residential areas with a node and the kind of settlement as requested in the instructions. Please do not include a courtyard between a few buildings and map it as 1 building Best regards and keep... commented 2025-10-10 12:48:50 UTC by Frans S ♦9,909 |
| 173091377 (Comments: 1) | Ligaro Support (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 commented 2025-10-10 12:46:08 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172123090 (Comments: 1) | Oli G (MSF-G) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not forget to mark a settlement with a mark (hamlet, village etc) as requested in the instructions. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-10-10 12:42:04 UTC by Frans S ♦9,909 |
| 172524963 (Comments: 1) | Chris Denomy (Discussed changesets: 29) | This also introduced a gap in the coast path, which I fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172802429 . commented 2025-10-10 12:38:53 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦470 |
| 172526874 (Comments: 1) | Chris Denomy (Discussed changesets: 29) | It looks like this introduced a gap https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dpc in Wales_Coast_Path_Llyn_Coastal_Path 1820886 . I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173092758 . commented 2025-10-10 12:38:09 UTC by SomeoneElse2 ♦470 |
| 173077690 (Comments: 3) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 342) | Perfekt, tak for info. Jeg undlader adressedata fremover, det går både hurtigere og giver en mere ensartet mapping. Arbejder indtil videre i iD, hvilket fungerer udmærket, selvom jeg kan forstå at josm har flere funktioner. commented 2025-10-10 12:36:05 UTC by qrisztly ♦5 |
| 172804633 (Comments: 1) | Farzell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Имя только для собственных имен. Например “Александровский дворец” или “Магнит”. А вот местные названия, номера домов или тип... commented 2025-10-10 12:29:11 UTC by s777n ♦302 |
| 173072485 (Comments: 3) | steve_jobs (Discussed changesets: 1) | It works! https://www.osm.org/search?query=Topaz+Plaza+1981%2C+Davidson commented 2025-10-10 12:24:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172863876 (Comments: 2) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 113) | Corregido. Gracias por avisar. commented 2025-10-10 12:10:43 UTC by dcapillae ♦381 |
| 173048529 (Comments: 2) | letsridebikes (Discussed changesets: 41) | Apologies, think that was a mistake on my part. Partially reverted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173090678#map=19/51.379536/-2.363897 commented 2025-10-10 11:52:51 UTC by letsridebikes ♦65 |
| 170132508 (Comments: 1) | Stephen Males (Discussed changesets: 21) | Newleaf Parade is marked as one-way, but TfNSW buses are apparently still travelling the other direction. The current imagery doesn't appear to indicate one-way traffic. Please Check. commented 2025-10-10 11:45:31 UTC by donmac703 ♦6 |
| 153487598 (Comments: 1) | Mouette85 (Discussed changesets: 3) | hi Mouette85, I NOTICED YOU HAVE ADDED A HAIRSTYLIST IN CAPITAL LETTERS, we do not usually do it (save very short abbreviations), as we try to record the world neutrally. commented 2025-10-10 11:43:12 UTC by fmc_1 ♦5 |
| 169369915 (Comments: 1) | Thingummy (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi. I was looking at Sutton Gault, a location I'm familiar with. I notice that in this changeset you deleted the road bridge across the Old Bedford River: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31698238/history/3 I doubt the bridge is actual... commented 2025-10-10 11:40:21 UTC by Ian Jackson ♦2 |
| 173088147 (Comments: 1) | TimGram (Discussed changesets: 4) | Top, dank je. commented 2025-10-10 11:26:23 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦675 |
| 173046307 (Comments: 1) | Chanbasha2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've just noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436669796 - does it actually match what is actually on the ground here? It does not look like it from the imagery. Best Regards, Andy commented 2025-10-10 11:25:33 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173081542 (Comments: 1) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 9) | Not necessary. You are just creating misaligned roads here. TomTom should not be pushing this challenge. commented 2025-10-10 11:23:57 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦675 |
| 168325714 (Comments: 1) | DerF1Freak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo DerF1Freak, Du bist neu bei OSM . herzlich willkommen dass Du zu OSM beitragen möchtest. Als Neuling sind Dir Fehler unterlaufen, Die Dir wahrscheinlich nicht bewusst sind.: die tatsächlichen Gegebenheiten vor Ort klinge... commented 2025-10-10 11:23:07 UTC by Mammi71 ♦263 |
| 173087202 (Comments: 1) | aarraabbeellaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM :) It seems there is some copypasta with a google docs link which snuck in the access tags. I did a quick check on the parking spots only on Kohila tänav, i don't know if there's more of them elsewhere. Can you... commented 2025-10-10 11:16:14 UTC by tshikaboom ♦6 |
| 173088452 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 124) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436894547<... commented 2025-10-10 11:10:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 169301172 (Comments: 4) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 46) | Grazie mille, ne terrò conto! commented 2025-10-10 11:10:21 UTC by f_gonella ♦35 |
| 173066968 (Comments: 4) | TimGram (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Tim, Ik zie dat je nooit een welkomstmail hebt ontvangen van de Dutch Community.. Bij deze alsnog...Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggi... commented 2025-10-10 11:09:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 171186538 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 46) | Grazie, ripristinato classificazione. commented 2025-10-10 11:08:34 UTC by f_gonella ♦35 |
| 173071478 (Comments: 3) | TimGram (Discussed changesets: 4) | Naamlabels zijn verwijderd https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173088147 commented 2025-10-10 10:53:19 UTC by TimGram ♦3 |
| 173035845 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ciao Bibo, anche qui hai inserito un doppione della stazione Quattro Venti, generalmente è molto improbabile che manchino stazioni nel territorio di Roma, in questo caso l'abbiamo dal 2011: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101289622 Q... commented 2025-10-10 10:49:41 UTC by fmc_1 ♦5 |
| 171752009 (Comments: 3) | jajanja3 (Discussed changesets: 25) | So unfortunately if you look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:city , it should be used for towns too. In the UK addr:city usually uses the 'post town', which Gillingham is. So a village next to Gillingham would still use addr... commented 2025-10-10 10:45:57 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦93 |
| 168479096 (Comments: 1) | gigi2037 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ciao Gigi, ho notato che hai modificato la Stazione di Santa Palomba da public_transport=station in stop_position (e mi trovi d'accordo), segnalo che sarebbe da modificare anche railway=station in railway=stop (ho fatto ora la modifica). Purtrop... commented 2025-10-10 10:42:01 UTC by fmc_1 ♦5 |
| 173087324 (Comments: 1) | qumil (Discussed changesets: 61) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11393132908 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-10 10:41:00 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173087355 (Comments: 1) | qumil (Discussed changesets: 61) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11050719485 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-10 10:40:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173086294 (Comments: 1) | SerdarP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarını reklam amaçlı kullanmayınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-10 10:38:40 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173086245 (Comments: 1) | SerdarP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarını reklam amaçlı kullanmayınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-10 10:38:18 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172990686 (Comments: 1) | BiboORM (Discussed changesets: 24) | Buongiorno Bibo, ti segnalo che non mancavano questi stazioni, ora sono doppi. Forse non hai visto le stazioni perché non sono rappresentati da nodi ma da aree (è migliore perché consente di capire l'estensione, la d... commented 2025-10-10 10:33:23 UTC by fmc_1 ♦5 |
| 173070140 (Comments: 2) | TimGram (Discussed changesets: 4) | Typfouten gecorrigeerd https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173087183 commented 2025-10-10 10:32:08 UTC by TimGram ♦3 |
| 172650953 (Comments: 3) | BerbiceRiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you very much! Have a great day commented 2025-10-10 10:21:14 UTC by brdrsrsu ♦6 |
| 173053700 (Comments: 1) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 53) | Imielin Rynek zniknął (znowu?) Relatify czasami usuwa losowo przystanki, zwłaszcza jak mają stary schemat tagowania - highway=bus_stop na jezdni i highway=platform jako linia na peronie (np. Katowice Sądowa). Imielin Rynek ma już właściwy,... commented 2025-10-10 10:19:38 UTC by zuicz ♦282 |
| 172908963 (Comments: 2) | 8462368 (Discussed changesets: 4) | P.S. Ich habe den Rad- und den Gehweg hier außerdem zu einer gemeinsamen path-Linie jeweils mit Detailattributen für den Geh- und den Radweganteil zusammengelegt. Hier gibt es aber verschiedene Mapping-Varianten - deine war also nicht unbe... commented 2025-10-10 10:08:53 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦423 |
| 173062529 (Comments: 1) | GIGAS25 (Discussed changesets: 2) | What does note=7 mean? commented 2025-10-10 10:07:42 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦186 |
| 172936688 (Comments: 6) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Sehr gut, dann sind wir uns doch zumindest in der Sache einig. Weiterhin frohes Mappen! commented 2025-10-10 10:06:58 UTC by travelling_salesman ♦9 |
| 173068331 (Comments: 3) | Karel973 (Discussed changesets: 50) | bicycle:backward=use_sidepath toegevoegd tussen fietspad aansluitingen. Groet eggie commented 2025-10-10 09:59:22 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172845687 (Comments: 2) | Guy Kazakov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes you're right the elevators should connect different levels but previously the connections were to the parallel road at the same level and not the correct road at level 0. edit as you see fit commented 2025-10-10 09:58:46 UTC by Guy Kazakov ♦1 |
| X | 173077008 (Comments: 1) | STWSK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changesets should ideally be kept small and localized, please! They're much more informative and less globally visible if you do that. This change combines parking in Switzerland with garages in Saskatchewan, Canada, so it would have been... commented 2025-10-10 09:49:27 UTC by Andrew Chadwick ♦60 |
| 172774697 (Comments: 1) | sandstorm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ciao sandstorm https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4998830 mentions that there is *no* building here in construction. Can you tell us more about the `knowledge`where you got the outline from? Greetings, habi commented 2025-10-10 09:39:17 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 173084582 (Comments: 1) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 202) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-10-10 09:37:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 173083759 (Comments: 1) | JaKiLa1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag JaKiLa1, De winkel staat al op de kaart. Ik heb je bijdrage verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-10 09:36:50 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173083795 (Comments: 1) | Mamutinka (Discussed changesets: 92) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431821117 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-10-10 09:31:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173083503 (Comments: 1) | Szelma Tattoo Wrocław (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-10 09:31:04 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173058402 (Comments: 1) | retti68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wie im in der Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4997751 beschrieben. Ist dieser 'Viehsteig' auch in anderen Kartenwerken drin und wird regelmässig begangen. https://nakarte.me/#m=15/47.21402/12.13255&l=O/Sr |
| 151534924 (Comments: 1) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 16) | This changeset incorrectly connected a bridge to the road it crosses. Please don't use roads as area relation members. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2025-10-10 09:08:59 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 173083440 (Comments: 1) | RDiach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Привіт RDiach, ласкаво просимо і дякуємо за ваш внесок! Щоб полегшити співпрацю та допомогти іншим зрозуміти ваші зміни, найкраще додат... commented 2025-10-10 09:06:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 147449539 (Comments: 1) | Carlos_Sánchez (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bridges should not connect to roads they cross. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147449539 commented 2025-10-10 08:54:21 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 154692517 (Comments: 1) | Mykhailo Sindieiev (Discussed changesets: 1) | The bridge should not be connected to the road it crosses. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154692517 commented 2025-10-10 08:52:13 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 165375268 (Comments: 4) | Peri3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Un saludo commented 2025-10-10 08:37:50 UTC by Peri3 ♦1 |
| 123155689 (Comments: 4) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 69) | Ich habe 9864070317 "zur Sicherheit" auch gelöscht. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173081874 commented 2025-10-10 08:20:25 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 173078195 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 13) | There's obviously something there given the `highway=` drawn to the `=peak` commented 2025-10-10 08:06:07 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,615 |
| 173032125 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 13) | I don't understand what's "disappearing", and you are still creating many more dragged points. Don't upload such mishaps. They do more harm than any good. commented 2025-10-10 08:01:06 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,615 |
| 172894145 (Comments: 1) | 특전포병 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 부대 삭제한 이유가 있나요? commented 2025-10-10 07:54:57 UTC by 록시너기 ♦1 |
| 173070268 (Comments: 1) | Rocket Racoon (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ik heb rcn route 20-44 hersteld. Was nog best een klusje. Wat je met ID toevoegt aan een route komt altijd onderaan te staan en dat is meestal niet de goede plek. In dit geval dus ook niet. De routedelen moesten ook nog de role forward krijgen,... commented 2025-10-10 07:39:49 UTC by dvdhoven ♦945 |
| 166608727 (Comments: 2) | Zilvervisje (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ahhh die zebra is in juni weer teruggekomen. 'k Zie het al. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-10 07:38:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173050948 (Comments: 4) | jOE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für deine ausführliche Diskussion im Forum! commented 2025-10-10 07:12:24 UTC by jOE ♦1 |
| 172956488 (Comments: 3) | dzonigis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Super, hvala. Ako želiš, možeš da se priključiš zajednici OSM Srbija preko Telegram kanala osm_sr, ili preko foruma: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64. commented 2025-10-10 07:10:45 UTC by MaliMrav ♦50 |
| 173047679 (Comments: 2) | _PBl_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Pozdrawiam commented 2025-10-10 06:53:51 UTC by _PBl_ ♦2 |
| 172717528 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | I'm wondering why information=* is set to proposed:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as ref, description, operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, website, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal? commented 2025-10-10 06:52:55 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,938 |
| 172717338 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | I'm wondering why information=* is set to demolished:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal? commented 2025-10-10 06:52:29 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,938 |
| 172717248 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | I'm wondering why information=* is set to abandoned:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as covered, description, operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal? commented 2025-10-10 06:52:07 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,938 |
| 172716995 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 59) | I'm wondering why information=* is set to was:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal? commented 2025-10-10 06:51:36 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,938 |
| 173070015 (Comments: 2) | Zinzmi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Zinzmi, Hat sich die Beschilderung hier etwa geändert? Bisher wer der Weg an der Straße als reiner Radweg beschildert (das hast du ja mittlerweile wieder so eingetragen). Der zurückgesetzte Weg war aber an allen drei Zugä... commented 2025-10-10 06:45:51 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,398 |
| 172971985 (Comments: 4) | fghj753 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Thanks y'all! Isn't there a script that should do the semi- or even automatic imports? What happened to that? commented 2025-10-10 06:41:33 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦15 |
| 173069380 (Comments: 2) | Mark-Andrew (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, Du hast recht. Hatte ich gestern nacht übersehen. Habe es wieder korrigiert. commented 2025-10-10 06:40:53 UTC by Mark-Andrew ♦4 |
| 169125995 (Comments: 4) | TommyRobloxOfficial (Discussed changesets: 14) | Proszę przywrócić DGP. Skasowałeś ją bez żadnych podstaw. Wygląda to na wandalizm. commented 2025-10-10 06:38:50 UTC by Interswd ♦37 |
| 172809810 (Comments: 5) | wadenick (Discussed changesets: 5) | Check out the "follow line" feature under Tools. Really handy if you have to re-use points on an existing way. And since you asked, I spotted this overlap tonight: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13194759713 commented 2025-10-10 06:29:42 UTC by b-jazz ♦734 |
| 173077041 (Comments: 1) | Bitmap Adoption (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-10 06:24:28 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173077004 (Comments: 1) | campbelltree (Discussed changesets: 1) | Forgot to mention this is based on note #4707855; I'm used to it showing up in closed:note commented 2025-10-10 05:37:35 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 172996175 (Comments: 1) | likooo (Discussed changesets: 2) | 将近70公里的山路啊？好体力 commented 2025-10-10 04:50:27 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦13 |
| 173026793 (Comments: 2) | felixthefreak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution. Is "Consign Design" furniture shop still here, or was it replaced? commented 2025-10-10 04:50:18 UTC by pwbriggs ♦76 |
| 160837978 (Comments: 1) | leonieegslr (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12465522755 - what is here? Their office in nor marked building? Meeting spot? commented 2025-10-10 04:45:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 76251606 (Comments: 1) | Mechtal (Discussed changesets: 35) | wycofałem tą edycję - mimo prób kontaktu nie widać poprawy błędnych edycji https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173076011 commented 2025-10-10 04:42:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 172935358 (Comments: 2) | Ozge Inan (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173075718 commented 2025-10-10 04:25:47 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 172831984 (Comments: 1) | Midstream09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset incorrectly connected a bridge to the road it crosses --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172831984 commented 2025-10-10 04:22:51 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 172797894 (Comments: 2) | Evros1969 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hllo söm4324 danke für deine Korrekturen und Umbauten der Pfarrkirche St Martin. Das hast du für mich gut bearbeitet, sieht gut aus auf 3D. In die Zukunft werde ich das Shema building udd building=part besser beherrschen dank deiner Ra... commented 2025-10-10 04:22:09 UTC by Evros1969 ♦13 |
| 173075307 (Comments: 2) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 101) | This changeset was too large and split by JOSM on upload so added the above comment to both changesets. commented 2025-10-10 04:20:58 UTC by nevw ♦2,048 |
| 173075314 (Comments: 1) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 101) | There was a tiny remnant of Jardine National Park mapped on osm but this bit was not on CAPAD 2024 so is deleted. Other tiny remnants of Jardine NP in CAPAD 2024 are not mapped in osm anyway. commented 2025-10-10 04:16:23 UTC by nevw ♦2,048 |
| 173074323 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 15) | I did not remove Industrial Park Road, the VT CRC roads (Research Center/Kraft/Pratt Drive), Southgate Drive, Beamer Way, Washington Street, Kent Street, and Alumni Mall from the Smart Way Bus (SW) route relation because doing so would take a lot of ... commented 2025-10-10 04:05:17 UTC by Frank Peng ♦27 |
| 171522571 (Comments: 1) | cabildo was (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Cabildos. He visto que has estado mapeando ríos y quebradas, eso está muy bien. Solo te quería contar que waterway representa el flujo del agua, y esta siempre es aguas abajo: conecta con otro río o quebrada o ... commented 2025-10-10 04:00:20 UTC by AngocA ♦199 |
| 172683623 (Comments: 1) | Federico Explorador (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hola Federico. Veo que has estado mapeando meandros. Si bien un meandro parece que no se moviera el agua, de alguna forma debe tener un flujo. Por eso, al usar la etiqueta waterway (flujo de agua) para mapear meandros, se deben conectar con ot... commented 2025-10-10 03:43:07 UTC by AngocA ♦199 |
| 173072338 (Comments: 1) | Nate Wildermuth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Could you give a source for the names you used here? The name tag should only be used for common, widely-used names and not used to describe things. commented 2025-10-10 03:21:39 UTC by MassCartog ♦191 |
| 173070546 (Comments: 10) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 188) | Si, estoy al tanto commented 2025-10-10 02:57:57 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦13 |
| X | 173021435 (Comments: 1) | Baron Harkonnen (Discussed changesets: 14) | Please save in between edits in completely different areas. commented 2025-10-10 02:04:13 UTC by InsertUser ♦460 |
 | 128244501 (Comments: 9) | NunoCaldeira (Discussed changesets: 23) | https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/fixme=validate%20geometry%20using%20the%20maproulette%20task#chronology - at current rate it will be completed by 2040, but admittedly it is being reviewed and going down commented 2025-10-10 01:59:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 166488397 (Comments: 1) | غيثمحمدخربشه (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18834 commented 2025-10-10 01:53:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173064939 (Comments: 1) | Robert_pl12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18833 commented 2025-10-10 01:45:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173065310 (Comments: 2) | Banana_men (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18832 commented 2025-10-10 01:42:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173073236 (Comments: 1) | Alex Paré (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pour plus d'infos voir: https://www.bromont.net/utilisation-des-sentiers-officiels-du-domaine-naturel-du-lac-gale-et-respect-de-la-servitude-de-conservation/ commented 2025-10-10 01:40:23 UTC by Alex Paré ♦2 |
| 166513565 (Comments: 1) | Somnath Darkunde (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nothing fixed. just moved a node slightly --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166513565 commented 2025-10-10 01:38:24 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 166685449 (Comments: 1) | Somnath Darkunde (Discussed changesets: 5) | nothing fixed --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166685449 commented 2025-10-10 01:21:56 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,117 |
| 172684554 (Comments: 2) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Der Tag check_date ist laut OSM-Wiki da sinnvoll, wo sich Daten ggf. des Öfteren ändern können wie Öffnungszeiten oder Leerzeiten eines Briefkastens. Auch umfasst check_date, das ein Objekt VOLLSTÄNDIG, also alle Tags davon, ... commented 2025-10-10 01:18:13 UTC by Bobbi123 ♦136 |
| 173071839 (Comments: 1) | Rodrigo Rega (Discussed changesets: 32) | Added boards. Source: note #3665124, #3665125 commented 2025-10-10 00:02:18 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦354 |
| 173066449 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 23:36:54 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 171858285 (Comments: 3) | Thermostopqc (Discussed changesets: 2) | (machine translation into French/traduction automatique en français) Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! Je pense qu'il y a eu un problème : vous avez accidentellement transformé toute la zone indust... commented 2025-10-09 23:33:51 UTC by TagaSanPedroAko ♦526 |
 | 173018998 (Comments: 1) | Derek Morr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Accidentally damaged the S150 road by merging bridges and roads. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173071022 commented 2025-10-09 23:06:57 UTC by Derek Morr ♦5 |
| 172340084 (Comments: 2) | Andrsur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Да, я только узнал, но я там был и данные все равно верные commented 2025-10-09 23:06:57 UTC by Andrsur ♦1 |
| 173016838 (Comments: 9) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 23) | Entsprechend deiner Ausführungen sind also die Endstücke, derzeit als Secondary oder Primary gekennzeichnet, zu Motorway Link zu ändern. Gleichzeitig ist (in diesem Fall) der Tag zone:traffic=DE:rural oder alternativ motorway=no hinzuz... commented 2025-10-09 22:46:29 UTC by vanagaudi ♦26 |
| 173019696 (Comments: 5) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Fa, lo ví hace 4 meses en su primer parada en el Garrahan, igual tiene lógica commented 2025-10-09 22:34:04 UTC by AgusQui ♦606 |
| 173065894 (Comments: 1) | MC Cliste (Discussed changesets: 13) | Je me permets de rappeler qu'il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter "crop=grape" contrairement à ce que suggère l'éditeur car par définition la vigne produit du raisin. Et il y a enco... commented 2025-10-09 22:31:08 UTC by acubens71 ♦37 |
| 173053932 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 421) | Reverted commented 2025-10-09 22:24:59 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,001 |
| 173036260 (Comments: 1) | irish34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. commented 2025-10-09 22:24:55 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 173023532 (Comments: 1) | Sifen Wakitola (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: What you might be seeing is the imagery offset has changed since this was first maped. To adjust the offset, select the background icon in the editor, the towards the bottom, move the imagery to match to the existing background -... commented 2025-10-09 22:24:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173037277 (Comments: 1) | Foxscotch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding all of the sidewalks. it one of my favoriate things to do. If you are interested in adding more detail, check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide. I'll ... commented 2025-10-09 22:21:47 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 173069694 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 451) | Actually a few trees, and some hedges in Towthorpe commented 2025-10-09 22:06:24 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 172943433 (Comments: 2) | Magick93 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello 5359! Great catch! Those tags must have come over from QGIS when the public source data was split into smaller manageable chunks. The ID tag is simply a sequential number for each file/chunk, and the size tag indicates the number of elements... commented 2025-10-09 22:02:47 UTC by Magick93 ♦37 |
| 173064293 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 272) | To nie duplikat - istnieje zarówno Wysoka, część Gdyni, jak i Wysoka, część Gdańska. commented 2025-10-09 21:51:09 UTC by czebureks ♦118 |
| 172872456 (Comments: 2) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Si, lo vi, es mejor poner "Ex Correo Central" honestamente commented 2025-10-09 21:50:14 UTC by Nicolás Antonio Celano ♦13 |
| 137664132 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 302) | Hi, This is the former Moor Park Golf Course. Sold off about 10 years ago. I've marked it abandoned:leisure=golf_course https://www.independent.ie/farming/a-whole-new-ball-game-in-meath/31603469.html commented 2025-10-09 21:45:55 UTC by VictorIE ♦946 |
| 171926973 (Comments: 25) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 3) | And let's not forget: some areas might have a dirt parking space and maybe a bbq grill and a picnic table, that doesn't always really rise to the level of a park. It's a grill in a boundary=protected_area. It's a big worl... commented 2025-10-09 21:43:57 UTC by stevea ♦312 |
| 173061170 (Comments: 1) | Texas Auto Part (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173069054 commented 2025-10-09 21:26:03 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 148267495 (Comments: 3) | d3mol3k (Discussed changesets: 107) | poprawię zaraz :) commented 2025-10-09 21:08:52 UTC by dzamper ♦152 |
| 168139613 (Comments: 3) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 19) | vielen Dank für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Das Vorgehen ist zwar auf den ersten Blick etwas umständlicher, aber mit etwas Routine geht es dann doch recht schnell. Gruß jmsbert, commented 2025-10-09 20:58:23 UTC by jmsbert ♦164 |
| 172727266 (Comments: 1) | Nicolás Antonio Celano (Discussed changesets: 16) | Teniendo 1 solo ramal no tiene sentido poner ref=1-B, no hay otro ramal para diferenciar, con poner ref=1 alcanza. Después en name=* se indica el nombre completo del ramal. commented 2025-10-09 20:57:07 UTC by AgusQui ♦606 |
 | 171519484 (Comments: 3) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 119) | Hi, The Bing and Esri imagery shows the rivers essentially completely filling the areas. The Intermittent tag could well be applicable here. In that case I think one would have to be careful to mark the minimal size separately, since th... commented 2025-10-09 20:51:43 UTC by Tómas Ingi ♦82 |
| 173067211 (Comments: 1) | lilauid (Discussed changesets: 1) | 我誤上傳了這個變更，請幫忙撤銷。 commented 2025-10-09 20:43:07 UTC by lilauid ♦1 |
| 172947141 (Comments: 1) | wkLeon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fixed the very close points warning. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172947141 commented 2025-10-09 20:36:43 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173067123 (Comments: 1) | mookie_the_cat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Looks all good to me! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173067123 commented 2025-10-09 20:33:29 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173064084 (Comments: 5) | michal_f (Discussed changesets: 13) | Wielkość jak zwykle jest dyskusyjna. Uznaję, że centralny obszar parku jest wystarczająco duży, by zastosować właśnie takie rozwiązanie. Odpowiedź na Twoje pytanie właściwie nasuwa się sama. Używam prostych tagów, stosowanych po... commented 2025-10-09 20:27:24 UTC by michal_f ♦11 |
| 173027501 (Comments: 2) | Daniel Hulse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed node problems in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173067420#map=14/37.41191/-122.12262&layers=C Fixed accidental use of cycleway:left instead of cycleway:right here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173062375#map=16/37... commented 2025-10-09 20:26:18 UTC by Daniel Hulse ♦1 |
| 173025813 (Comments: 3) | Mapikids (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks :) commented 2025-10-09 20:25:44 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,636 |
| 172482197 (Comments: 1) | don-h (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao don-h Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Ich habe die von dir hier eingegebene Telefonnummer ins international Format konvertiert, da "wir" diese ... commented 2025-10-09 20:25:32 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 172215781 (Comments: 2) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 58) | Bedankt voor de opmerking en de reparatie. commented 2025-10-09 20:25:25 UTC by lyctkel ♦343 |
| 173064661 (Comments: 1) | pixelpete (Discussed changesets: 10) | You forgot to update your changeset comment :) --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173064661 commented 2025-10-09 20:21:10 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173066611 (Comments: 3) | Cybermanx (Discussed changesets: 4) | Per precisare, con SOSPENDERE intendo un atto documentato formale, non il mero annuncio sul sito del tram/dichiarazione dell'assessore. Io nelle ordinanze ho sempre letto di modifiche della circolazione delle vie, ma mai una citazione agli sp... commented 2025-10-09 20:08:31 UTC by Cybermanx ♦7 |
| 172981853 (Comments: 1) | impiaaa (Discussed changesets: 25) | This is a failed upload; reverted in 173066845 commented 2025-10-09 20:05:51 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173015883 (Comments: 3) | GRi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Danke :) commented 2025-10-09 20:04:44 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,636 |
| 171407353 (Comments: 1) | kubash (Discussed changesets: 17) | Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-09 19:59:34 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 165788805 (Comments: 1) | Compositor (Discussed changesets: 28) | שלום, צריך לקשר ישירות לקובץ התמונה ולא לדף בויקישיתוף. כלומר: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/Byzantine_Watch_Tower_at_the_Nejmeh_Ridge.jpg ולא https://commons.wiki... commented 2025-10-09 19:58:58 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
| 165492379 (Comments: 2) | Martin Ligabue (Discussed changesets: 24) | it was imported badly by Embarto, they already made bad imports in the past, here I just merged the two features without checking for the validity of the data. I have no idea what the meaning might be... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1279... commented 2025-10-09 19:58:49 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦31 |
| 165816569 (Comments: 3) | pps345 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonsoir Peter, Merci pour ton retour. Je ne vois rien sur la première page qui dit qu'il y aurait quelque chose à cet endroit. par conséquent il n'est pas correct de dire qu'il y a une attraction touristique ... commented 2025-10-09 19:58:44 UTC by Marc_ch ♦282 |
| 173065279 (Comments: 1) | Banana_men (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-09 19:56:40 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172150201 (Comments: 3) | berjk (Discussed changesets: 38) | As for searching, searching with Nominatim for names given in `alt_name:de` works just as fine as for names given in `name:de`, so no need to be concerned with that. Still, whatever name is deemed to be the most common contemporary variant (I ... commented 2025-10-09 19:56:26 UTC by dzamper ♦152 |
| 155086669 (Comments: 1) | Avraham Chitrit (Discussed changesets: 1) | למה למחוק את התמונה ולשנות את השם לשם לא נכון? בוטל commented 2025-10-09 19:53:56 UTC by hatul ♦400 |
| 173064777 (Comments: 1) | TomN22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback... Tip Probeer de BAG adresnode intact te laten. Gewoon de bedrijfsinfo veranderen. Ik heb de BAG data teruggezet... commented 2025-10-09 19:50:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173064924 (Comments: 1) | DLoop (Discussed changesets: 2) | County road numbers aren't names or alt names, they're refs. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173064924 commented 2025-10-09 19:49:35 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,183 |
| 171454021 (Comments: 4) | segi (Discussed changesets: 24) | Vďaka. prešiel som to dúfam že som už všetko opravil. Ak ešte na niečo natrafíš daj vedieť. commented 2025-10-09 19:26:02 UTC by segi ♦37 |
| 172618665 (Comments: 2) | SonOfZenMaster (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia! Köszönöm. :) commented 2025-10-09 19:25:18 UTC by SonOfZenMaster ♦6 |
| 173007924 (Comments: 3) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 56) | Bonjour, Ce sont des chemins utilisés pour le fauchage. Ils sont bien présent sur les talus, ca forme des replats sur la pente. Ces replats me semblent inintéressant à cartographier, et je ne connais pas d'autre fa... commented 2025-10-09 19:24:03 UTC by AurélienQ ♦137 |
| 168440238 (Comments: 1) | a3n-abds (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Qu'est ce qui a motivé ce changeset ? Je ne suis pas tout à fait certain que cette piste réouvre un jour... commented 2025-10-09 19:19:27 UTC by AurélienQ ♦137 |
| 162325636 (Comments: 1) | Wolfgang Holtz (Discussed changesets: 24) | Zu deiner Frage: "warum ist hier auf halber Höhe des Deiches eine "zusätzliche künstliche Böschung"?" Auf der Linie verlief die ehemalige Freihafen Zollgrenze und hier stand u.a. ein Zaun. Seit der letzt... commented 2025-10-09 19:13:03 UTC by pyspam ♦2 |
| 172984036 (Comments: 1) | Black_Diamond (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks - couldn't tell what street it was on from the station :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172984036 commented 2025-10-09 18:54:05 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 172994097 (Comments: 2) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 149) | Name macht ja auch keinen Sinn in dem Fall commented 2025-10-09 18:44:49 UTC by thetornado76 ♦171 |
| 173046232 (Comments: 1) | Kunsthaus Michel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OSM! Wollt ihr eventuell etwas mehr als nur den Namen (wer oder was seid, Kontaktmöglickeiten) hinzufügen? commented 2025-10-09 18:44:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173063959 (Comments: 1) | raptorrescue (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinn... commented 2025-10-09 18:40:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173063181 (Comments: 1) | Robert_pl12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | A gdzie jest znak zakazu? Bo na pewno nie w rzeczywistości commented 2025-10-09 18:40:51 UTC by Szymson ♦408 |
| 173045327 (Comments: 1) | BitPinhall (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:40:44 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173052659 (Comments: 1) | BitPinhall (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:40:16 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173063125 (Comments: 1) | Robert_pl12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Przecież ta droga istnieje normalnie commented 2025-10-09 18:38:12 UTC by Szymson ♦408 |
| 173063745 (Comments: 1) | Robert_pl12 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Co to za głupoty z tym usunięciem linii promu? commented 2025-10-09 18:36:31 UTC by Szymson ♦408 |
| 173015836 (Comments: 1) | jessrinehart (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:32:35 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173022710 (Comments: 1) | jessrinehart (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:32:28 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173015811 (Comments: 1) | jessrinehart (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-09 18:31:50 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 173054205 (Comments: 8) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-09 18:24:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 171997212 (Comments: 1) | Päivikki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moi, onko tähän rakennettu tällainen kävelytie, kun ei missään ilmakuvissa tai streetside-kuvissa näy? commented 2025-10-09 18:19:45 UTC by Sakari_N ♦84 |
| 169947609 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 262) | Zdravim, preco body motorway_junction na niecom, co nie je dialnica? commented 2025-10-09 18:18:52 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
 | 135953564 (Comments: 1) | Cephas Mũtai (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Cephas, Thank you for contributing to OSM data. I have notice you have mapped quite a number schools but with a wrong tag i.e. you have tagged the boundary of the school as a building instead of using the that on individual buildings. K... commented 2025-10-09 18:16:51 UTC by Walter Mayeku ♦10 |
| 173042455 (Comments: 3) | 0svald (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, thanks for clarifying. Edu õpingutega. commented 2025-10-09 18:16:01 UTC by fghj753 ♦58 |
| 173000491 (Comments: 2) | Ralftora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ignore the last request, i was informed this was EKA Architecture students' homework. commented 2025-10-09 18:09:40 UTC by fghj753 ♦58 |
| 173033910 (Comments: 2) | HBruch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for bringing this to my attention, kind regards. commented 2025-10-09 18:07:54 UTC by HBruch ♦1 |
| 67017187 (Comments: 2) | Benek123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I could not find these ruins at all in October 2025. pms63 commented 2025-10-09 17:52:53 UTC by pms63 ♦3 |
| 172627372 (Comments: 2) | VLD322 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for reaching out to me. I appreciate the positive contributions you have made in this area. If I recall correctly, this was one of my first interactions with your edits. Upon reviewing the quality of your other work, I revisited this and ma... commented 2025-10-09 17:50:37 UTC by VLD322 ♦1 |
| 173014505 (Comments: 3) | tegabo (Discussed changesets: 2) | You also realigned a way in this changeset. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173014505 commented 2025-10-09 17:32:19 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173027323 (Comments: 1) | DeflockEmily (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey there, don't see anything particularly wrong with this change. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173027323 commented 2025-10-09 17:31:25 UTC by campbelltree ♦18 |
| 173060880 (Comments: 1) | tshikaboom (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks commented 2025-10-09 17:20:54 UTC by fghj753 ♦58 |
| 155007433 (Comments: 2) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 119) | Sorry for the late response. The way had a self intersection, and also was not properly connected to the crossing service ways. It looked like a total error. The same issue we can now see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15... commented 2025-10-09 17:13:32 UTC by gscholz ♦2,785 |
| 154972468 (Comments: 1) | nicola_yubo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi nicola_yubo, can you please edit the way properly, it is not connected to the crossing service ways. Kind regards Guido commented 2025-10-09 17:12:48 UTC by gscholz ♦2,785 |
| 173057937 (Comments: 1) | PiretS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tere, Piret. Kui sa tead, et oled parasjagu samas piirkonnas midagi muutmas, siis ei ole mõtet iga paari minuti tagant muudatusi eraldi changesetina üles laadida, vaid lisa need ühe suurema üleslaadimisena. iD värvib ü... commented 2025-10-09 17:06:11 UTC by fghj753 ♦58 |
| 173052668 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 37) | No ale chyba nie będę się rozpisywać przy zmianie tylko jednego tagu jednego obiektu. commented 2025-10-09 17:04:02 UTC by marazzer ♦42 |
| 173059420 (Comments: 1) | Mehmet Ali ERAT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Bir yolun highway=residential etiketini highway=living_street olarak değiştirmişsiniz. (iD editörde bir nesneyi seçtiğinizde sol alt köşede o nesnenin etiketlerini görebilirsiniz.) iD editörde yazan şey bazen... commented 2025-10-09 17:01:23 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 173059616 (Comments: 2) | Vonter (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello commented 2025-10-09 16:58:02 UTC by Vonter ♦75 |
| 172723788 (Comments: 2) | tartiflex (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, Les clés ref:FR:CDxx font référence aux conseil départementaux, en l'occurrence ici celui de Haute-Savoie (74) pour ref:FR:CD74. Voir ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Liste_des_r... commented 2025-10-09 16:57:04 UTC by tartiflex ♦13 |
| 171841543 (Comments: 6) | ramthelinefeed (Discussed changesets: 47) | What tends to happen elsewhere is that you'd have a superroute for the "named route" (see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16327216 ) which has only relations as components - in my example https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-09 16:54:18 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 134319749 (Comments: 2) | JochenB (Discussed changesets: 61) | Ich vermute eher, es war ein "Einfüge"-Fehler. Statt nur die Tags einzufügen hat es den ganzem Weg eingefügt. Die Shortcuts dind sehr ähnlich. Danke für den Hinweis, habe es gelöscht! commented 2025-10-09 16:53:41 UTC by JochenB ♦95 |
| 172982675 (Comments: 4) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Frage ist halt ob jeder abgesenkte Bordstein auch eine Querungsmöglichkeit ist, viele davon sind ja auch einfach für Ausfahrten vorhanden. Man kann sich ja auch drüber streiten ob man Leute nicht lieber über offizielle Wege schick... commented 2025-10-09 16:36:29 UTC by stirps ♦5 |
| 173055573 (Comments: 1) | KrabbeJ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Tip... Gebruik de Quickortho 25 cm Dan zie je alle wegen al liggen. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 16:32:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173057722 (Comments: 1) | torisugari (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-10-09 16:28:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 173055686 (Comments: 1) | KrabbeJ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag KrabbeJ Wanneer deze steraat nog niet opgeleverd is dan beter taggen met highway=construction construction=residential MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 16:25:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173025677 (Comments: 1) | G_Meredith (Discussed changesets: 17) | Have all of those trees actually been cut down? commented 2025-10-09 16:23:02 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 172994489 (Comments: 2) | map per (Discussed changesets: 91) | Good catch, deleted the accidentally uploaded 'tid' value commented 2025-10-09 16:11:00 UTC by map per ♦1,314 |
 | 168465123 (Comments: 3) | angys (Discussed changesets: 104) | what "watson" is? Is it some type of shop? commented 2025-10-09 15:42:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 171046178 (Comments: 1) | HostileSpark (Discussed changesets: 2) | FYI what you see on the City of Calgary MyProperty map is just the former Adelaide Street right-of-way label. The street itself, and portions of 9th and 11th Streets, were demolished 5-6 years ago to accommodate the Green Line LRT, and they are never... commented 2025-10-09 15:35:39 UTC by hoserab ♦206 |
| 169379597 (Comments: 4) | vietnam321 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ok nếu vậy bạn cứ để tên ngõ 102 cho đúng thực tế vậy 👍 commented 2025-10-09 15:03:17 UTC by vietnam321 ♦9 |
| 173041636 (Comments: 1) | Aleksander | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 27) | Skąd ta data 2025-10-20? commented 2025-10-09 14:50:05 UTC by Szymson ♦408 |
| 173050187 (Comments: 1) | Chris van Buijten (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-09 14:41:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172915617 (Comments: 9) | xcazin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oui, je n'ai pas précisé, je n'ai jamais commandé de livres sur Amazon, et ce n'est pas parce que je n'ai jamais commandé de livres, même sur internet. Car je passe volontairement par des vraies l... commented 2025-10-09 14:38:33 UTC by trial ♦942 |
| 173040144 (Comments: 1) | Larazo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De dubbel getagde naam heb ik verwijderd MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-09 14:38:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173046462 (Comments: 1) | marktechratp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Le point en question que tu as edit n'est pas le tribunal administratif, c'est la mahkama du pacha. Le tribunal administratif est l'immeuble plus en bas a gauche. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167628017 commented 2025-10-09 14:24:28 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 171800986 (Comments: 7) | UtterClutter (Discussed changesets: 30) | I am suggesting that it is an illegitimate detail, as postal code is not a name and is extremely unlikely to be used as a name postal code should be added as postal code (with postal_code key) not as a name (with name key) commented 2025-10-09 14:19:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,074 |
| 172160406 (Comments: 4) | berjk (Discussed changesets: 38) | The German name Preßburg was the primary name used for the city until 1919. commented 2025-10-09 14:10:08 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦216 |
| 164927102 (Comments: 3) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 128) | Thing is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery_point seems to be about whether a postal address is a deliverable unit. Not the actual co-ord of mail drop/collect. Adding an amenity=letter_box might help, but then it's separate from th... commented 2025-10-09 14:10:06 UTC by Pink Duck ♦158 |
| 173022892 (Comments: 1) | Bienerer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E&... commented 2025-10-09 13:56:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 167577025 (Comments: 1) | Loshu (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1394995446/history seems to be tagged as a "community_centre=community_hall" which seems odd? Regards, Andy commented 2025-10-09 13:52:29 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173044258 (Comments: 3) | Niklaus Weiss (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thank you for your comment and the constructive discussion. Indeed, not all institutions fall under this category, as certain competencies are vested in federal agencies. However, two of the three branches of democratic authority do. The designation ... commented 2025-10-09 13:45:29 UTC by Niklaus Weiss ♦6 |
| 173042821 (Comments: 3) | Arcas88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | all fixed commented 2025-10-09 13:43:52 UTC by nevw ♦2,048 |
| 173009809 (Comments: 2) | ERU_Mentz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Manuel, für unser barrierefreies Routing verknüpfen wir immer bis an die Steigkante, das steht für den Einstieg in Bus/Bahn/... und unterstützt unser internes Routing. Welches Luftbild ich letztlich im Hintergrund habe, ist ... commented 2025-10-09 13:41:02 UTC by ERU_Mentz ♦3 |
| 173051549 (Comments: 1) | Valario127 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fuente: https://x.com/oscar_puente_/status/1976211397437423719/video/2 commented 2025-10-09 13:32:33 UTC by Valario127 ♦3 |
| 172964135 (Comments: 2) | OttoR (Discussed changesets: 68) | It's work in progress. If it is regardign BGT tags; they will be removed. commented 2025-10-09 13:09:58 UTC by OttoR ♦64 |
| 171125862 (Comments: 5) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 77) | Danke für die Info. Ich denke, wir zwei sind die einzigen Mapper, die da aktiv sind, da sehe ich keinen weiteren Handlungsbedarf. Ansonsten hatte ich Kontakt mit dem Naturpark Wildeshauser Geest. Die haben die fehlenden Knotenpunkt-Einschieber i... commented 2025-10-09 13:06:28 UTC by GerdP ♦2,777 |
| 173040308 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | thank u commented 2025-10-09 12:53:46 UTC by MaciekMma ♦68 |
| 166371284 (Comments: 1) | Tenasuhvari (Discussed changesets: 4) | hi, thanks for contribution! in future please base objects of the buildings not where the roof is situated on the satellite, but where the buildings stands on the ground, otherwise the position will be incorrect like here, where it's obvious it&... commented 2025-10-09 12:52:21 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦347 |
| 173048869 (Comments: 1) | Islingtonian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Det er en rigtig dårlig ide at redigere i et konstruktionsområde med Ortofotos der er 1&1/2 år gamle. commented 2025-10-09 12:42:00 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,708 |
| 173048851 (Comments: 1) | Clínica Veterinária Medcani (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-10-09 12:39:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 167324110 (Comments: 2) | TranslatorPS (Discussed changesets: 23) | Nope. The kb in ref:kb is short for Komunikacja Beskidzka. Thanks for fixing the uppercase ref:KMAL and ref:KMK tags though, I've been meaning to get back to those. commented 2025-10-09 12:32:20 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦37 |
 | 172589760 (Comments: 1) | tezzyyyy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173048479 commented 2025-10-09 12:27:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172586920 (Comments: 1) | tezzyyyy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173048479 commented 2025-10-09 12:27:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172586008 (Comments: 1) | tezzyyyy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted fantasy edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173048479 commented 2025-10-09 12:27:22 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172167234 (Comments: 2) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Tak - ale mają lada chwila ponownie otworzyć 3269Lpo bypassie: https://www.kronikatygodnia.pl/artykul/50010,s17-w-budowie-mieszkancy-gminy-labunie-odcieci-od-swiata-zablokowano-trzy-drogi-naraz commented 2025-10-09 12:15:38 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173036417 (Comments: 1) | kaufmannstylstrup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dit POI har fået adresse defineret som en relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19694046 commented 2025-10-09 12:15:13 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,708 |
| 172842997 (Comments: 1) | qrisztly (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174004696. What is the mean of the tag ref:cvr = 30202503 ? Did you mean ref:DK:cvr? commented 2025-10-09 12:11:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172918085 (Comments: 2) | GlobEX ONE Cloud (Discussed changesets: 2) | please respond commented 2025-10-09 12:08:28 UTC by Udarian ♦497 |
| 173046536 (Comments: 1) | Katta Saikiran (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Katta Saikiran, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your ... commented 2025-10-09 12:00:38 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 173018755 (Comments: 4) | EdGB91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Don't worry about the dragged nodes, a lot of people do that while they're getting used to the web-based iD editor. It's usually easy to spot and fix. Adding the roads from the developer's map is a problem, becau... commented 2025-10-09 11:46:14 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 163490802 (Comments: 1) | ThomasA (Discussed changesets: 23) | Der er næppe 5 forskellige ladestandere på denne tankstation. Bemærk at der kun bør være en "amenity=charging_station" for hver ladestation med forskellige egenskaber. Hvis der er mere end en stander pr. lades... commented 2025-10-09 11:39:41 UTC by Linus W Frische ♦22 |
| 172539469 (Comments: 2) | McLout (Discussed changesets: 1) | Так звісно. Там під'їзди з різних сторін будинку. commented 2025-10-09 11:38:25 UTC by McLout ♦1 |
| 173016959 (Comments: 3) | grelus (Discussed changesets: 71) | ;o okej, to zdaje sie być istotną barierą, dziekuje za zrozumienie commented 2025-10-09 11:36:59 UTC by Yog Sot ♦316 |
| 173033155 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi. Thank You. But There is still restriction on a stretch of road a few hundred meters immediately after exit 56 direction east. commented 2025-10-09 11:26:23 UTC by akotys ♦1 |
| 172934987 (Comments: 2) | victorelgueta (Discussed changesets: 13) | Entendido, gracias. commented 2025-10-09 11:25:58 UTC by victorelgueta ♦10 |
| 172013926 (Comments: 1) | Jhowie_Nitnek (Discussed changesets: 185) | I gues you meant: type=provides_feature not type=type=provides_feature ;-) commented 2025-10-09 11:15:36 UTC by trial ♦942 |
| 173040936 (Comments: 3) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | You genuinely added lots of details to this area. It is a shame your edits are such a mixture of fake and real features. Othwerise not everything would have needed to be reverted. commented 2025-10-09 11:10:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 173040667 (Comments: 2) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:50 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172757302 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172712777 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172696808 (Comments: 2) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172740058 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172696573 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172781132 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172240453 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 173040547 (Comments: 2) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172151238 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:49 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172101177 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172124371 (Comments: 1) | Luis28042012 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Reverted Farming Simulator edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079 commented 2025-10-09 11:02:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 172954625 (Comments: 2) | dmfr (Discussed changesets: 21) | It's an error, thank you for letting me know! commented 2025-10-09 10:58:41 UTC by dmfr ♦59 |
| 172999165 (Comments: 1) | Bosin_Time (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1436404663. What is the mean of the tag Объезд Центрального рынка в городе Таганрог = Объезд центрального рынка в город... commented 2025-10-09 10:51:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173034945 (Comments: 3) | ZzMak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, ik reageerde op het verkeerde onderwerp. Ja, zit in het gebouw https://maps.app.goo.gl/zTFve1itoxjfacYA9 Hier zijn ook nog enkele die niet Organics Maps staan. https://m.cityappalmelo.nl/locaties/openbaar-toilet-6374c25a8... commented 2025-10-09 10:48:21 UTC by ZzMak ♦1 |
| 172932204 (Comments: 1) | ฐิติพร การบัญชี (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/1319854424. What is the mean of the tag 8สำนักงานบัญชี? commented 2025-10-09 10:47:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173033118 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 342) | Adressepunkterne må der ikke ændres på: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser Tilføj evt. en relation som vist her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19693912 commented 2025-10-09 10:46:12 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,708 |
| 172457467 (Comments: 2) | Fasha4 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Są to drogi w planowanym Obwodzie Utrzymania Dróg (OUD), który ma być zbudowany w ramach budowy S11. Źródłem są plany sytuacyjne z koncepcji programowej tej inwestycji. Zrektyfikowana mapa jest dostępna tutaj: https://ma... commented 2025-10-09 10:36:53 UTC by Fasha4 ♦15 |
| 173024123 (Comments: 3) | Enyace (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke das du nochmal rüberschaust, das es dann die shared lane nichtmehr braucht wusste ich noch nicht, in der Bahnhofstraße hast du vollkommen recht, da habe ich nicht bedacht das der Radweg an der Ecke Breite Straße endet. Ich ... commented 2025-10-09 10:28:44 UTC by Enyace ♦2 |
| 173006419 (Comments: 2) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 2) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173042199 commented 2025-10-09 10:23:44 UTC by kingkingHK ♦18 |
| 173041400 (Comments: 1) | Mechowskyy (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dodałem również istniejącą nieformalnie część wsi. commented 2025-10-09 10:05:13 UTC by Mechowskyy ♦2 |
| 173024206 (Comments: 2) | Enyace (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin! Seit ungefähr einem Jahr ist die gesamte Straße "Trift" vom thaerplatz bis zum Kreisel eine ausgeschilderte Fahrradstraße, die Schutzstreifen gibt es nichtmehr. Liebe Grüße. --- ... commented 2025-10-09 09:57:58 UTC by Enyace ♦2 |
| 173039713 (Comments: 1) | angdev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da open data Comune di Lecce risulta area cani per sgambamento commented 2025-10-09 09:31:04 UTC by angdev ♦1 |
| 172989517 (Comments: 2) | tmp44 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Cześć, dzięki, poprawię commented 2025-10-09 09:29:37 UTC by tmp44 ♦1 |
| 170791561 (Comments: 1) | Кріц (Discussed changesets: 5) | Доброго дня Уточніть будь ласка, яке джерело даних? commented 2025-10-09 09:26:53 UTC by Monstrofil ♦27 |
| 173007943 (Comments: 2) | Business Rocket (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thank you for your message and your correction. My intention was not to modify the data on an address or a building. A rookie mistake on your platform. Sorry for this rookie error, I'll try to be careful from now on. My g... commented 2025-10-09 09:24:48 UTC by Business Rocket ♦1 |
| 163577609 (Comments: 3) | Đuro Jiří (Discussed changesets: 83) | ok, merci je n'avais pas vu le _ee de streetcomplete et je viens de voir ta pratique, j'aurais pu me douter ! encore merci du retour ! bonne journée commented 2025-10-09 09:12:14 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,262 |
| 172962761 (Comments: 4) | rui228 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Ok. Understood. commented 2025-10-09 09:07:57 UTC by rui228 ♦32 |
| 172948741 (Comments: 1) | ludopera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ludovic, Attention à bien utiliser les valeurs suggérées par l'outil pour le renseignement de l'essence. Ex avec l'objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12612653157#map=19/45.154959/5.727544 o&ugrav... commented 2025-10-09 09:03:22 UTC by SIG Echirolles ♦5 |
| 173012044 (Comments: 1) | jlov3001 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Dag jlov. Het is verder goed gegaan. Je historic=monument het ik omgetagd naar =memorial. Een monument is bv de Tajmahal in India. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 09:03:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 173036150 (Comments: 1) | julessgds (Discussed changesets: 7) | 👋 vu :) commented 2025-10-09 08:45:13 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,262 |
| 173037527 (Comments: 1) | Ula | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 14) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-10-09 08:41:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 169945863 (Comments: 1) | sgrubsmyon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Auf den neuen Luftboldern ist hier ein Gebäude zu erkennen! commented 2025-10-09 08:37:54 UTC by redrace ♦161 |
| 173025950 (Comments: 1) | OlgaDm (Discussed changesets: 4) | Доброго дня, прохання якщо редагуєте адреси, вносьте зміни згідно останього вікі osm.wiki/Uk:Адреси де адреси з 1А, 3Б потрібно писати 1-А, 3-Б. Дя... commented 2025-10-09 08:27:43 UTC by kamasytrix ♦41 |
| 161328311 (Comments: 2) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 150) | Bij "retired year" staat er 2024 met een bron, die bron is een tabel van de FOD Economie die zegt dat deze generator definitief buiten dienst gesteld is. Geen idee wat dat betekent voor de situatie op het terrein. commented 2025-10-09 08:23:18 UTC by M!dgard ♦804 |
| 173037273 (Comments: 1) | Brindemort (Discussed changesets: 1) | Piccola specifica; StreetView è aggiornato solo nella parte inferiore della piazza! commented 2025-10-09 08:22:24 UTC by Brindemort ♦1 |
| 172768981 (Comments: 2) | even666 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hab die fehlerhafte Info erst einmal entfernt. Wenn du weißt, wie viele Etagen das Gebäude hat, sag Bescheid oder trag es gerne selber ein. commented 2025-10-09 08:17:06 UTC by söm4324 ♦48 |
| 173033217 (Comments: 1) | Arabika99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie usuwaj faktycznie istniejących dróg - jeżeli jest to droga prywatna, dodaj znacznik "access=private". commented 2025-10-09 08:10:07 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173000917 (Comments: 2) | nona mostafa (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thanks for sharing that with us. Feel free to revert it commented 2025-10-09 08:05:34 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 172932308 (Comments: 4) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks ilias_ for fixed them!! commented 2025-10-09 07:57:13 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 171231872 (Comments: 1) | kiwichickenmusician (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-10-09 07:50:06 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172327133 (Comments: 1) | kiwichickenmusician (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-10-09 07:49:54 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173034874 (Comments: 1) | kiwichickenmusician (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-10-09 07:49:42 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172954397 (Comments: 2) | Anastasia Kourou (Discussed changesets: 1) | the official business address is 176b Westbourne Grove you can see the offical website https://www.paolita.co.uk/contact/ commented 2025-10-09 07:35:34 UTC by Anastasia Kourou ♦1 |
| 173033983 (Comments: 3) | ZzMak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rabobank verplaatst naar ander gebouw. Adresnode De Werf hersteld . commented 2025-10-09 07:27:17 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 171572501 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 368) | Please make sure that we just call these driveways instead of service roads, even though service roads are the same thing, it's just better to call them driveways. Thank you commented 2025-10-09 07:24:01 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦3 |
| 172948625 (Comments: 1) | Raphael Z-IoT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Raphael, der Weg war auch vor Deiner Änderung für Fahrräder freigegeben. Es ist ein normaler Track, bei dem kein explizites Verbot für Fahrräder eingetragen ist. Deine Änderung ist daher eigentlich überf... commented 2025-10-09 07:06:41 UTC by disc24 ♦30 |
| X | 172041688 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 368) | Please check this CS as you have mapped a service road inside a shopping mall? commented 2025-10-09 07:06:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173030470 (Comments: 2) | Arcas88 (Discussed changesets: 2) | All fixed now to changeset 16 commented 2025-10-09 06:56:54 UTC by nevw ♦2,048 |
| 173023294 (Comments: 4) | Groenev (Discussed changesets: 1) | De opmerking in Zweden kan wellicht beter in het Zweeds of Engels. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4996786#map=14/55.84397/13.57730 MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 06:46:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 149321992 (Comments: 2) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 67) | Ja - ist es - siehe auch mapillary. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.89651939999996&lng=8.365727800000059&z=19.24339938691478&pKey=664199622969082&focus=photo&x=0.8048422863400213&y=0.39990255208536696&zoom=0 |
| 170807581 (Comments: 7) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | I've already stated my concerns and objections to their removal; please read above to find them. Thanks. commented 2025-10-09 06:40:23 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 172779881 (Comments: 1) | Carpaticum (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-09 06:35:33 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173033052 (Comments: 1) | Carpaticum (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-09 06:35:25 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172041468 (Comments: 1) | Lavanya kamatam (Discussed changesets: 368) | Removed roads going through the west City Mall; it is entirely impossible to label parking aisles going through a parking garage, hence why the whole thing has just been tagged as multi-story. Thanks. commented 2025-10-09 06:32:25 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦3 |
| 173022775 (Comments: 2) | Sjoerd3847859 (Discussed changesets: 2) | De omgeving heb ik aangepast naar de actuele situatie. Voor nu even brug toegevoegd en het woonerf aangepast naar residential. https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.59621,6.106768,19/?datastrip=20250914_PNEO-04 commented 2025-10-09 06:26:25 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 167117452 (Comments: 1) | NicoSa (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo NicoSa, kannst du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272567859/history nochmal anschauen. Wie kann der Weg für Fußverkehr nur conditional sein aber für Radverkehr offen, sogar designated? VG commented 2025-10-09 06:17:50 UTC by tordans ♦420 |
| 163900605 (Comments: 1) | nao000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:地物ひとつにOSM要素はひとつ commented 2025-10-09 06:17:24 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦24 |
| 172891160 (Comments: 4) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 8) | ok. Not all modules are working for me today((.thanks for the corrections commented 2025-10-09 06:13:50 UTC by kosmgeolan ♦6 |
| 173022888 (Comments: 1) | Sjoerd3847859 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Soerd.... Een naam, extra eigenschappen kunnen wel, maar er horen geen adresgegevens op de gebouwomtrek. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-09 06:08:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172990698 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 11) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-09 05:54:35 UTC by rboda ♦3 |
| 172445706 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 11) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-09 05:54:07 UTC by rboda ♦3 |
| 172446805 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-09 05:53:24 UTC by rboda ♦3 |
| 172692525 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour, Attention, même avec JOSM, certaines modifications inversent l'ordre des ways dans une partie de relation. C'est le cas pour la relation r7091938. Pouvez-vous corriger ? Marc commented 2025-10-09 05:49:43 UTC by mga_geo ♦263 |
| 172957206 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957143 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956699 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956980 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956720 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957400 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956894 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957326 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957575 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172957842 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956561 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956128 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956495 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956478 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172956007 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955852 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955802 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955198 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955730 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955408 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955503 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955689 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955377 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955263 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955306 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955444 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955349 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955586 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954954 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954851 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954998 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172955159 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954747 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954825 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954795 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954602 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172953712 (Comments: 4) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954228 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954364 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954531 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954559 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 172954585 (Comments: 1) | Arab Mapper (Discussed changesets: 98) | DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173031983 commented 2025-10-09 05:39:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,508 |
| 173023937 (Comments: 2) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo, meines Wissens nach habe ich via Osmose Seite Schreibweisen von der Region Oberbayern angepasst wo es eine Fehlermeldung gab. Ich ändere es wieder. commented 2025-10-09 05:11:02 UTC by Michael Spitzenberger ♦4 |
| 172984094 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 13) | Can you explain what you are trying to do? Mass deletions, and dragged points. commented 2025-10-09 04:21:38 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,615 |
| 172943151 (Comments: 1) | DesertTrip (Discussed changesets: 2) | I am confused as to why the original three homes, (that were the subject of several news articles in 1908 as the three original historic homes in the development) were expanded to include two homes built MANY years later that are not historic at all ... commented 2025-10-09 03:54:13 UTC by DesertTrip ♦2 |
| 172254974 (Comments: 3) | DDD丶Samuel (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for your suggestions! At present, only comprehensive inspection trains have been put into service on the Guangzhou-Zhanjiang High-Speed Railway. Once the official opening date is determined and passenger trains start operating, These inform... commented 2025-10-09 03:45:56 UTC by DDD丶Samuel ♦11 |
| 172982407 (Comments: 1) | ParmaCanal (Discussed changesets: 4) | Que crees que haces nisiquiera eres de este pueblo para estar editando si no sabes no edites commented 2025-10-09 02:36:38 UTC by Novelgomez ♦2 |
| 172946415 (Comments: 1) | JuuuuuuRu (Discussed changesets: 1) | 不好意思，你好像把整棟住宅建築改成獸醫院。還是這真得是佔24層樓的大型獸醫院？ --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172946415 commented 2025-10-09 02:34:00 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,504 |
| 172037804 (Comments: 17) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 3) | Since the previous geometry which drew from aerial imagery better follows the median of the two traces, I would like to restore it. What do you think? commented 2025-10-09 02:27:30 UTC by ZLima12 ♦261 |
| 172942359 (Comments: 2) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 8) | Хорошо, спасибо за информацию. Соглашусь с Вами commented 2025-10-09 01:42:02 UTC by kosmgeolan ♦6 |
| 172881152 (Comments: 2) | lowbattery001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you so much for fixing that! I was using OSM on a mobile browser like a fool. :/ commented 2025-10-09 01:14:17 UTC by lowbattery001 ♦1 |
| 172899243 (Comments: 5) | Mercanto123 (Discussed changesets: 17) | jest, skoro ludzie wydeptali, co widac również na różnych ortomapach, ale nie masz wprawionego oka tak w mojej opinii. commented 2025-10-09 00:58:11 UTC by Yog Sot ♦316 |
| 167818665 (Comments: 1) | Charter7124 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nothing there commented 2025-10-09 00:57:19 UTC by af1312 ♦2 |
| 171591725 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 11) | Apparently we also delete the correct building=yes tag of Chilton House and replace it with landuse=residential. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173027549 commented 2025-10-09 00:50:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 173023135 (Comments: 1) | stevethomp (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please be careful with golf course edits. You set obvious fairways as "rough" or "green" instead of properly setting them to "fairway". Thanks. commented 2025-10-09 00:44:45 UTC by b-jazz ♦734 |
| 171592381 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 11) | Has 99 Bikes moved or closed? Your changeset deleted it, but the comment makes no reference to this. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12878802190/history commented 2025-10-09 00:43:59 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 172357873 (Comments: 4) | CanopyFalls (Discussed changesets: 1) | That would be my guess. These cycle routes like NCN67 seem a little pointless. They often just kick cyclists out into roads with little to no notice and I don't know if it's worth actually keeping them mapped. This one here doesn't eve... commented 2025-10-09 00:39:04 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦1 |
 | 172917709 (Comments: 2) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 31) | file and start editing commented 2025-10-09 00:33:11 UTC by Allroads ♦435 |
| 170571716 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 11) | By deleting the highway=* tag, unfortunately you have effectively made this path invisible to data consumers, including renderers and routing software. The footway=* tag only really makes sense when combined with highway=footway (or similar), see the... commented 2025-10-09 00:30:05 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 173027152 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 277) | Literówka w nazwie nowej ulicy, naprawiłem commented 2025-10-09 00:25:04 UTC by syntex ♦877 |
| 172975668 (Comments: 1) | Wey2go (Discussed changesets: 11) | Gates and other barrier nodes shouldn't generally be mapped at intersection nodes. Although the sidewalk way is badly aligned, I doubt that anyone walking along the pavement of Harlington Road West between Clymping Dene and Hounslow Road has to ... commented 2025-10-09 00:13:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 136978218 (Comments: 1) | atika nubla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not copy and paste features unless they truly have the same shape. commented 2025-10-09 00:06:07 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 77777507 (Comments: 1) | Nurmianti (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't copy and paste features, unless they truly have the same shape. commented 2025-10-09 00:03:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173025916 (Comments: 1) | BTC DENTAL (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted your addition of a business and bitcoin tags to a roadway. Please add the dental practice details to the building you operate from instead. commented 2025-10-09 00:00:48 UTC by nevw ♦2,048 |
| 172713371 (Comments: 1) | Olivia A Gordy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please take care when mapping beyond task boundaries in an active project; it seems like you added some duplicate building footprints due to this. don't worry I resolved them. commented 2025-10-08 23:56:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 172975342 (Comments: 1) | Clitheroe Warrior (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-08 23:53:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 173025723 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Tu l'as déjà ajoutée en tant que point, pas besoin de la rajouter une deuxième fois en tant que area commented 2025-10-08 23:41:31 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172698964 (Comments: 3) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Спасибо. Произошло недопонимание мной поставленной задачи, поэтому Вы правы, этим объектам тут не место и их следует удалить и не наноси... commented 2025-10-08 23:37:07 UTC by ReiT ♦1 |
| 172936991 (Comments: 1) | mupoozry (Discussed changesets: 3) | Would service=alley also apply to these roads? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley commented 2025-10-08 23:31:59 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,636 |
| 172994586 (Comments: 1) | M_Kucha (Discussed changesets: 82) | Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173026515 commented 2025-10-08 23:30:25 UTC by Bienson ♦327 |
| 173025669 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 188) | cambios a partir del lunes en la 707 y 333 aqui te paso https://www.quepasaweb.com.ar/las-lineas-707-y-333-modifican-sus-recorridos-a-partir-del-lunes/ commented 2025-10-08 23:22:50 UTC by i2004 ♦159 |
| 173025618 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Mais arrête de mettre des tags au hasard?? Pourquoi tu mets source=kaat ground survey?? T'es avec la team Kaart?? Tu sais ce que ça veut dire au moins? commented 2025-10-08 23:19:52 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 77182489 (Comments: 1) | diahputri (Discussed changesets: 2) | [ENG] Hi, I see it's been a while since you mapped this, but did you actually know that the buildings you mapped in this area are houses or were you just using aerial imagery? You enveloped multiple buildings in individual footprints, so I'... commented 2025-10-08 23:17:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 141459525 (Comments: 1) | Herr_Baer (Discussed changesets: 1) | In der Gewässerdatenbank des Landesanglerverbandes Brandenburg wird dieses Gewässer geführt als Kiessee bei Leegebruch mit der Gewässernummer: P 14-117. Siehe hier: https://www.lavb.de/gwsmaps/ oder hier: https://www.alleang... commented 2025-10-08 22:59:49 UTC by Peter Maiwald ♦7 |
| 173020404 (Comments: 1) | bartgron (Discussed changesets: 165) | skoro `lane_markings=no` to po co tag `lanes` ? commented 2025-10-08 22:51:37 UTC by Yog Sot ♦316 |
| 173024795 (Comments: 1) | Yankovski (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-10-08 22:41:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173020813 (Comments: 2) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | C pas moi j'essaie de le changer commented 2025-10-08 22:28:02 UTC by Hdidanox ♦3 |
| 173025176 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Kool smoothie est un fast food, pas un restaurant. Encore une fois merci de te renseigner sur comment utiliser OSM avant de faire tes edits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta... commented 2025-10-08 22:27:40 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172274864 (Comments: 1) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 956) | Bonjour, j'ai remis le tag Voie de bus, je rappelle que ce n'est pas une bonne pratique de tag dans le but explicite d'influencer le rendu ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Taguer_pour_le_rendu ) C'est à la co... commented 2025-10-08 21:59:20 UTC by JigAma ♦7 |
| 172936605 (Comments: 1) | Map-Contributor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please don't delete nodes like this! It is more useful if you can leave it in place but as disused or vacant. commented 2025-10-08 21:54:44 UTC by murble ♦27 |
| 173022640 (Comments: 1) | OSPLipowczyce998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-08 21:52:38 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173008164 (Comments: 1) | lukubuku (Discussed changesets: 25) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436463753 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-10-08 21:45:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172995043 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 124) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13202384550 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-10-08 21:44:59 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173003329 (Comments: 4) | Krzysiu Jarzyna (Discussed changesets: 34) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13202652008 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-08 21:44:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 173014244 (Comments: 17) | Cristoffs (Discussed changesets: 132) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13203111053 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-10-08 21:44:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172883727 (Comments: 2) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hallo, danke für den Tipp. Das Kraftwerk siegt tatsächlich noch komisch aus. Es ist aber auch schwierig es richtig abzubilden commented 2025-10-08 21:29:20 UTC by SG86 ♦12 |
| 173023827 (Comments: 1) | LSWLDN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Apologies for the edit spam, this is the final iteration for today, was testing out some new modifiers I have not used before for mapping. commented 2025-10-08 21:18:38 UTC by LSWLDN ♦4 |
| 173021507 (Comments: 1) | agarrett528 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. Your change looks good to me. commented 2025-10-08 21:17:41 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 173015601 (Comments: 4) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Grazie a te Thomaso commented 2025-10-08 21:07:10 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦26 |
| 173023136 (Comments: 2) | Rodrigo Rega (Discussed changesets: 32) | source: PNOA; note #4855313 commented 2025-10-08 20:50:27 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦354 |
| 170888002 (Comments: 2) | threefoursixninefour (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks for your message, and apologies for any inconvenience. My rationale for the tagging is that ways like this give access to the service area not only for emergency vehicles, but also for staff and deliveries - this is my experience in France an... commented 2025-10-08 20:25:27 UTC by threefoursixninefour ♦10 |
| 172399956 (Comments: 3) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo Openminded 320, du hast in diesem Änderungssatz Pfade am Teufelsberg in Motorrad-Rennstrecken umgewandelt, auf denen laut deinem Tagging motorisierte Fahrzeuge verboten sind (!). Ebenso wirkt merkwürdig, dass diese Wege angeblich n... commented 2025-10-08 20:10:59 UTC by ChillyDL ♦102 |
| 173018688 (Comments: 4) | OXI (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, im OSM-Sinne bedeutet "*=designated", dass der Weg explizit für das Verkehrsmittel vorgesehen ist, nicht für "vorgesehenen" Verkehr, muss man sich dran gewöhnen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-10-08 20:06:49 UTC by limes11 ♦953 |
| 173015981 (Comments: 1) | Liasleh (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Wie schon vielfach geschrieben, aber leider ignoriert: Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen A... commented 2025-10-08 20:03:00 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 172675913 (Comments: 2) | ibanez (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you. I used ASIG for the numbers/street names and ESRI for the building outlines, and a mixture of both for the image offset. I assume that the OSM/ASIG licenses are compatible, but I haven't checked this. This means that all mapping effor... commented 2025-10-08 20:00:07 UTC by ibanez ♦84 |
| 173017481 (Comments: 1) | Tordem (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Otogar zaten mevcut olduğu(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376935108) için yanlışlıkla ikinci kez eklediğiniz otogarı sildim. Bilginize. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173021477 commented 2025-10-08 19:59:40 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172995574 (Comments: 1) | elevationhqnyc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Done! commented 2025-10-08 19:56:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173020509 (Comments: 2) | texa74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je n'arrive pas à créer un itinéraire passant pas le chemin ajouté. commented 2025-10-08 19:47:54 UTC by texa74 ♦1 |
| 172437405 (Comments: 1) | Maptes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi you can see how I improved one of the footprints here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/173019816 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend... commented 2025-10-08 19:40:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173020282 (Comments: 1) | SouthernRV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.o... commented 2025-10-08 19:35:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 173020458 (Comments: 1) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 114) | +source ZBGIS commented 2025-10-08 19:29:25 UTC by *Martin* ♦648 |
| 171462346 (Comments: 1) | grzebo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ramen! :) commented 2025-10-08 19:29:08 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦398 |
| 173020307 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 96) | Tag stosowany też w innych MDR - nie mapuję pod render. commented 2025-10-08 19:27:14 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦252 |
| 173012620 (Comments: 1) | mkostandi (Discussed changesets: 3) | и зачем вы тут все переломали и задвоили? откатываю все правки commented 2025-10-08 19:24:08 UTC by literan ♦6,831 |
| 173018836 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Olathe (Discussed changesets: 1) | remove SPAM description by https://www.osm.org/changeset/173020164 commented 2025-10-08 19:20:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172982231 (Comments: 1) | stirps (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin, hier Feldstraße macht gar keinen Sinn da separate Bürgersteige einzuzeichnen weil es nichtmal einen höhenunterschied gibt. Es ist eine Fläche. Damit ist mehr kaputt als gewonnen. Flo commented 2025-10-08 19:10:50 UTC by flohoff ♦2,384 |
| 172261780 (Comments: 4) | limes11 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Danke für die Info commented 2025-10-08 19:07:19 UTC by ma-rt-in ♦1,756 |
| 173018571 (Comments: 1) | LinkSake (Discussed changesets: 1) | Se cerró debido a error en la ubicación, se corrige en un cambio futuro commented 2025-10-08 19:04:36 UTC by LinkSake ♦1 |
| 173014012 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Arrête de supprimer les changements des autres, ils ont beaucoup plus d'expérience que toi commented 2025-10-08 19:04:36 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172237825 (Comments: 1) | Gino-52 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi! Weißt Du, wo und ob Relation 84492 (RB49: Hanau => Friedberg) in Assenheim (Oberhess) hält? Laut OSM-Daten fährt er über das mittlere Gleis (da ist kein Bahnsteig?), hält aber am nördlichen (stop-position)... commented 2025-10-08 18:59:34 UTC by Senihtu ♦98 |
| 173003653 (Comments: 1) | Maptes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! I've reviewed this contribution, and the following is my evaluation. This changeset is a bit of a mixed bag. Generally you improved the accuracy of existing building footprints while pr... commented 2025-10-08 18:53:11 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,024 |
| 173008526 (Comments: 1) | Yulia1001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Дороги внезапно исчезли https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173018561 commented 2025-10-08 18:35:29 UTC by Grass-snake ♦243 |
| 173012637 (Comments: 3) | Imogen12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Way: 376836631 was a PRoW, Hingham FP 1. Anyway, there's no reason to delete features that are there for all to see. commented 2025-10-08 18:31:16 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,938 |
| 173011722 (Comments: 1) | jojenonsos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vänligen flytta inte på redan inritade vägar m m. De är oftast importerade med rätt positionering. Bildbakgrunden Bing måste du justera först. Vad du gör just nu är att du flyttar saker som är r&aum... commented 2025-10-08 18:28:04 UTC by archie ♦1,346 |
| 173012797 (Comments: 1) | Sawyer777 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Sawyer, it looks like you accidentally included a road from Sulphur, LA in this changeset. You should try to keep changesets geographically compact when possible to make them easy to monitor. Additionally, the road is best described as residential... commented 2025-10-08 18:12:59 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦5 |
| 172915694 (Comments: 2) | suzlik (Discussed changesets: 1) | As requested, I reverted it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173017323 commented 2025-10-08 18:01:35 UTC by dgmapping ♦68 |
| 172991769 (Comments: 1) | Troy M Moore (Discussed changesets: 2) | description field is not meant to be used for advertising. commented 2025-10-08 17:59:52 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 173001911 (Comments: 2) | kuma314 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nie wiem jak sklasyfikować ten element dokładnie, ale to taki skwerek z paroma krzakami. Tory pełnią funkcję dojazdu do zakładów remontowych i przechodzą przez trawnik, są niejako zintegrowane z trawą. commented 2025-10-08 17:43:45 UTC by kuma314 ♦2 |
| 172893297 (Comments: 1) | anti-caveman (Discussed changesets: 19) | Какая русификация, местный язык тут русский, говорят все на русском, и все названия были правильными commented 2025-10-08 17:33:22 UTC by Partizanin ♦1 |
| 142674276 (Comments: 2) | gmbo (Discussed changesets: 96) | Du hast recht, entweder ich habe das falsch eingetragen oder es war beschriftet. Habe ers mal herausgenommen.Wenn ich das nächste mal da bin schaue ich genauer nach. commented 2025-10-08 17:16:12 UTC by gmbo ♦48 |
| 173007627 (Comments: 1) | Tanja Gäbler (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, hier meckert der Editor, weil zwei Gebäude übereinander liegen. Hier müsstest du ein wenig „aufräumen“, d. h. die Gebäude anhand eines guten Luftbildes (Sachsen) an ihre richtige Position schieben... commented 2025-10-08 17:15:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 173007750 (Comments: 1) | Tanja Gäbler (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, auch diese Bearbeitung habe ich mir angeschaut. Zwei Anmerkungen: Als Luftbild-Quelle hast du Esri verwendet. In vielen Ländern (auch Sachsen) stehen staatliche Luftbilder bereit, die eine bessere Qualität haben als ... commented 2025-10-08 16:47:31 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 172663155 (Comments: 2) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 33) | Merci Marc de me l'avoir signalé. Effectivement, j'ai modifié deux fois la relation (pour deux highways différentes) et seul le premier way a été supprimé de la relation (sans doute Ctrl+Z accide... commented 2025-10-08 16:47:08 UTC by Lisapple ♦48 |
| 173008210 (Comments: 1) | Tanja Gäbler (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten; ich vermute, weil der Editor Warnungen ausgeworfen hat, deren Deutung dir schwer gefallen ist. Was ist passiert: du hast einen einze... commented 2025-10-08 16:39:22 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 172965731 (Comments: 2) | billbogatay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! Not sure what happened there - went ahead and deleted that tag. commented 2025-10-08 16:37:13 UTC by billbogatay ♦1 |
| 173009880 (Comments: 4) | DST Thuir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pas de souci, je m'en occupe. N'hésitez pas à améliorer la carte soit directement, soit en laissant des notes. Bonne soirée commented 2025-10-08 16:32:02 UTC by LySioS ♦130 |
| 172776794 (Comments: 3) | manuei1994 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, wie ich sehe, hast du die Wege schon korrigiert, richtig? Ich kann sie mal nichtmehr finden. Danke, dass du so fleißig einträgst und korrigierst! LG Manu commented 2025-10-08 16:26:36 UTC by manuei1994 ♦1 |
| 163705123 (Comments: 2) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 34) | I źle zaznaczone są przystanki w Wieluniu. Jak uda mi się wczytać relatify, to poprawie. commented 2025-10-08 15:49:20 UTC by Kris74M ♦11 |
| 173011545 (Comments: 1) | jojenonsos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej jojenonsos, välkommen och tack för ditt bidrag! För att underlätta samarbetet och hjälpa andra förstå dina ändringar är det bäst att lägga till en kort beskrivning av de ändringa... commented 2025-10-08 15:47:14 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 67512209 (Comments: 1) | 4rch (Discussed changesets: 33) | This coastline is utterly wrong: 200024690 commented 2025-10-08 15:44:11 UTC by andershl ♦95 |
| 172982620 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | Those are TIGER tags. To be honest, I don't know what those specific ones mean. commented 2025-10-08 15:44:09 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 173011416 (Comments: 1) | jojenonsos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej, place-taggar är ortsbeteckningar som till största delen är importerade. De är inte till för att beteckna någon gård el dyl. Oftast är gårdsbeteckningen en helt annan. Ortsbeteckningen är histo... commented 2025-10-08 15:42:35 UTC by archie ♦1,346 |
| 172857608 (Comments: 3) | rumixist (Discussed changesets: 7) | Merhaba, Geri bildiriminiz için teşekkür ederim. Şimdi yollar ile binanın kesiştiği yerdeki düğüme otopark girişini belli etmesi için amenity=parking_enterance ve parking=underground etiketlerini ekledim. |
| 172894724 (Comments: 2) | kevinp2 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, no objection from me. commented 2025-10-08 15:29:18 UTC by kevinp2 ♦21 |
| 172753500 (Comments: 3) | OT Aire Eugénie (Discussed changesets: 16) | bonjour, j'ai fait une passe sur toutes les arènes du groupe de modification. Il y a 2 "objets" différents : - l'ensemble des arènes, avec les gradins et le terrain de sport - le terrain de sport <... commented 2025-10-08 15:28:14 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,262 |
| 172904714 (Comments: 1) | SanteriP (Discussed changesets: 5) | Moi, kumosin tämän barrier=bollard lisäyksen. Jos siltatyömaan haluaa esittää kartalla niin tämä on väärä tapa. Missä kohtaa siltatyömaa on? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changes... commented 2025-10-08 15:18:46 UTC by Sakari_N ♦84 |
| 170332995 (Comments: 1) | SanteriP (Discussed changesets: 5) | Moi, tämä muutos ei tainnut olla asianmukainen, ja se on nyt peruttu. Ruohoniementiellä on ilmeisesti ihan normaali käytössä oleva tasoristeys, eikä sitä ole syytä poistaa. commented 2025-10-08 15:16:43 UTC by Sakari_N ♦84 |
| 151136711 (Comments: 1) | SanteriP (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tässä muokkauksessa oli lisätty access=private ja barrier=bollard, molemmat on nyt poistettu. Onko näille lisäämillesi tiedoille jotain luotettavaa lähdettä? commented 2025-10-08 15:09:40 UTC by Sakari_N ♦84 |
| 173005927 (Comments: 1) | Jerome-Herbinet (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bien vu pour le layer=-1 par contre le access=yes n'est pas nécessaire. C'est la valeur par défaut si on ne précise rien et surtout ça veut dire accessible à tous. Je pense que ce n'est pas le cas ici... commented 2025-10-08 15:09:02 UTC by Gonéo ♦238 |
| 172988353 (Comments: 3) | tkotnala_lyft (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you so much for the additional edit and the data share Tanya! commented 2025-10-08 15:02:09 UTC by Mashin ♦576 |
| 172988215 (Comments: 1) | Szymi2673 (Discussed changesets: 9) | pomyliłeś odcinki, w informacji chodziło o Wolin-Troszyn wycofałem zmianę commented 2025-10-08 14:58:29 UTC by puchaczowsky ♦152 |
| 172993177 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 96) | BDOT tak czy siak daje informacje o części terenu oznaczonego obecnie placu budowy jako zagospodarowanie osiedla, więc można przy okazji się skłaniać ku zmianie zagospodarowania w OSM, jednakże tworzenie drogi na podstawie ortofotomapy pokazu... commented 2025-10-08 14:55:33 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦252 |
| 151436295 (Comments: 1) | SanteriP (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hei, olit muuttanut pyörätien seinäksi. Kumosin muutoksesi, koska en löydä mitään lähdettä sille että Kärjenkaaren poikki menisi joku seinä/aitarakennelma. Lisäksi tuo kevyenliikenteen ... commented 2025-10-08 14:50:06 UTC by Sakari_N ♦84 |
| 173008473 (Comments: 1) | Julius 458 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Julius 458, herzlich willkommen und vielen Dank für deine Mitarbeit! Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen dabei zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgeno... commented 2025-10-08 14:47:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172919600 (Comments: 1) | neuhausr (Discussed changesets: 14) | Including MnDOT page for project: https://dot.mn.gov/metro/projects/johnirelandbridge/index.html commented 2025-10-08 14:45:45 UTC by neuhausr ♦334 |
| 171951101 (Comments: 3) | Opitux (Discussed changesets: 2) | C'est corrigé commented 2025-10-08 14:40:36 UTC by Opitux ♦2 |
| 109893348 (Comments: 1) | Fabe56 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Bonjour, je suis perplexe devant le node 9017914133. Est-ce réellement une boîte d'envoi LaPoste/Chronopost ? ou un casier (parcel_locker) Vinted (VintedGo) ? Et je suis dubitatif que "ChronopostE" soit `o... commented 2025-10-08 14:40:07 UTC by LudovicG ♦88 |
| 172904929 (Comments: 1) | jkb_k (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-08 14:31:55 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172907546 (Comments: 1) | jkb_k (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-08 14:31:49 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 172990093 (Comments: 1) | jkb_k (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-10-08 14:31:42 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦518 |
| 173007996 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 390) | …Details ;) commented 2025-10-08 14:28:34 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 169029059 (Comments: 2) | esteban713 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, oui tu peux mettre à jour. Je l'ai ajouté de mémoire par rapport à la végétation car il n'y avait rien. Merci commented 2025-10-08 14:14:56 UTC by esteban713 ♦1 |
| 172972346 (Comments: 1) | ssilassarch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Burası gerçekten anaokuluna mı çevrildi? Yoksa değişikliğiniz deneme amaçlı mı? commented 2025-10-08 14:02:05 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172976450 (Comments: 1) | denizli web tasarim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zaten işletmenizi 9 ay önce eklemişsiniz. Bkz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12529091727 Lütfen SEO amaçlı spam değişiklikler yapmayınız. İkinci kez eklediğinizi ve spam etiketlerinizi sildim. https://www.openstr... commented 2025-10-08 13:43:08 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172791742 (Comments: 1) | felipeacsi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Highway is not yet completed, it´s estimated completion date is by the second half of 2028. commented 2025-10-08 13:31:50 UTC by dintrans_g ♦5 |
| 172915658 (Comments: 2) | IrdiIs (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi @ibanez! Thank you very much for mapping Albania and I'm glad my personal challenge motivated you. Regarding the ESRI imagery, as far as I have explored and mapped around Albania, the ESRI imagery is very bad in quality, and it hurts ... commented 2025-10-08 13:27:25 UTC by IrdiIs ♦5 |
| 172537469 (Comments: 5) | GUFSZ (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ja, danke. Jetzt ist er wieder da. Ist mir auch schon mal passiert. commented 2025-10-08 13:26:28 UTC by kaltuna ♦90 |
| 172989906 (Comments: 1) | Sgarr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset looks like you removed this peak. What was your reason for this? Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-10-08 13:18:59 UTC by MassCartog ♦191 |
| 173003825 (Comments: 1) | tiagojurca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá tiagojurca, bem-vindo e obrigado pela sua contribuição! Para tornar a colaboração mais fácil e ajudar os outros a entender as suas edições, é melhor adicionar uma breve descri&... commented 2025-10-08 13:17:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172395107 (Comments: 1) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hallo Openminded320, zwei kleine Hinweise, da es mir hier gerade zufällig aufgefallen ist: - Du hast laut Quellenangabe Bing benutzt. In Berlin haben wir deutlich bessere und aktuellere Luftbilder, die für OSM nutzbar sind und die auch i... commented 2025-10-08 13:13:51 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦423 |
| 173002607 (Comments: 1) | vellare (Discussed changesets: 5) | НЕ ПОТРІБНО додавати назви на російській _Разные продуктовые магазины_ commented 2025-10-08 12:50:33 UTC by kamasytrix ♦41 |
| 169553220 (Comments: 7) | plettman (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo Mortimer, ja, das stimmt :) Es hat zugegeben bei diesem Riesenkonzern mit unzähligen Unterabteilungen usw. auch ziemlich lange gedauert, bis ich da mal durchgedrungen bin zum zuständigen Ansprechpartner. Mir war das Problem ... commented 2025-10-08 12:50:13 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦6 |
| 155819385 (Comments: 2) | Cenyr (Discussed changesets: 6) | Soweit ich das sehe, sind nur einzelne Bereiche zum Parken ausgewiesen, der Rest ist durchaus als Bürgersteig nutzbar (von der sehr geringen Breite in der Werderstraße mal abgesehen). Ob das auch in der Praxis praktikabel ist, sei dahin ge... commented 2025-10-08 12:43:50 UTC by Cenyr ♦4 |
| 172919577 (Comments: 1) | mdavids (Discussed changesets: 18) | Dag mdavids. review_requested \tyes Dan lijkt het me nu correct. gr eggie commented 2025-10-08 12:42:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172947653 (Comments: 14) | Anastasia Mk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Um den Zaun zu erfassen, würde ich hier beginnen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide Bei Problemen bitte melden commented 2025-10-08 12:38:33 UTC by berndw ♦622 |
| 173000320 (Comments: 2) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 4) | Het hek heb ik verplaatst waar ik denk dat het staat. Gr eggie commented 2025-10-08 12:37:28 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172976865 (Comments: 2) | gonzalocandiay (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola! Tienes razón, lo cambié a Esri y calza con el del edificio de al lado. Intentaré actualizar commented 2025-10-08 12:37:16 UTC by gonzalocandiay ♦2 |
| 173000171 (Comments: 1) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Niko Een hek kan fysiek niet op een kruising staan. Dar hek staat zo te zien op de track en niet op de Kerkstraat zelf. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-08 12:13:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 163728963 (Comments: 1) | Bruxaboschi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, lo hanno inaugurato oggi, ergo presumo che sia ufficialmente valido "solo" da questo giorno: https://smart.comune.genova.it/comunicati-stampa-articoli/toponomastica-unarea-pubblica-di-sampierdarena-intitolata-don-giacomo commented 2025-10-08 12:12:05 UTC by EneaSuper ♦462 |
| 172737686 (Comments: 3) | I3ackslider (Discussed changesets: 1) | Убрал. Из типа объекта должно быть понятно commented 2025-10-08 12:11:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 173000720 (Comments: 1) | NikoStruiksma (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Niko... Wanneer je de begraafplaats nog wel kunt bezoeken dan beter permissive taggen. Wanneer de boel afgesloten is zou het wel klopoen. Mvg.. eggie commented 2025-10-08 12:07:06 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172975369 (Comments: 1) | shmulik581 (Discussed changesets: 4) | היי, תודה על התרומה! החזרתי את השינויים שעשית בכביש: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173000326 השינויים שעשית לא היו מהותיים מדי בכל מקרה. commented 2025-10-08 11:50:24 UTC by NeatNit ♦35 |
| 172974232 (Comments: 1) | Cassini IV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Cassini, great surveying job in my area! Thanks a lot for the hard work. If you have questions or need info about other areas that I correctly mapped, do not hesitate to send me a message. commented 2025-10-08 11:49:46 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172363806 (Comments: 3) | Small-Rider (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Small Rider, Don't worry, we've all started somewhere and we've all learned to use OSM. Your help editing Tanger is extremely valuable. As per the roundabout and the bus relations, I'll explain it to you. W... commented 2025-10-08 11:44:36 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 6839220 (Comments: 3) | harry_br (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vielen Dank Jakob48. Ich hatte nicht auf dem Schirm, dass harry_br inaktiv ist. commented 2025-10-08 11:32:37 UTC by Scout Jens ♦282 |
| 172997342 (Comments: 2) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 4) | Adresnodes hersteld commented 2025-10-08 11:29:53 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 168600750 (Comments: 3) | Gegenwind84 (Discussed changesets: 7) | I'm not sure what you're trying to say. My question was not "is this place still operational", but rather a concern that I think maybe this is a place that only produces heat and not electricity (which you added as an output of th... commented 2025-10-08 11:27:53 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,260 |
| 165220812 (Comments: 1) | tapai (Discussed changesets: 8) | Szia! start_date-et miért írtad át? Nem lehet 2016, mert 2015-ben már az osm-en is fent volt, linkelt forrás 2014-et ír. Ezeket a hosszú leírásokat hagyjuk meg a wikipedi&aa... commented 2025-10-08 11:23:30 UTC by infeeeee ♦592 |
| 172998469 (Comments: 1) | likooo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi likooo, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 highway(s) Could you please confirm if these ... commented 2025-10-08 11:11:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172976553 (Comments: 1) | gonzalocandiay (Discussed changesets: 3) | En este caso, La foto bing parece ser bastante mas antigua que la esri. El Construmart tiene ahora todo un edificio acoplado en la parte posterior. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2025-10-08 11:08:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,526 |
| 172918008 (Comments: 2) | fuling09260524 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 公交专用道被不正确地表示，因此回退 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172997723 commented 2025-10-08 10:52:10 UTC by Yui2 ♦9 |
| 168793661 (Comments: 1) | pierre5902 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution ! Les voies n'étaient pas connecté entre elle donc la voie verte ne pouvait pas ressortir dans un calculateur d’itinéraire, c'est réparé. Pas la peine d�... commented 2025-10-08 10:36:47 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦176 |
| 172994603 (Comments: 3) | Thvmh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke.. duidelijk. Mvg.. eggie commented 2025-10-08 10:29:10 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172992082 (Comments: 1) | Nonononononononononono (Discussed changesets: 1) | Untagged node removed as it serves no purpose. commented 2025-10-08 10:24:53 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,938 |
| 151530358 (Comments: 3) | Michael680 (Discussed changesets: 1) | alles klar, danke. :) commented 2025-10-08 10:22:42 UTC by chris66 ♦412 |
| 172556897 (Comments: 2) | plamen (Discussed changesets: 37) | Пиши- няма вода :) commented 2025-10-08 10:15:31 UTC by plamen ♦75 |
| 172376837 (Comments: 3) | sillywalks (Discussed changesets: 9) | Oh, danke für die Info. commented 2025-10-08 09:52:09 UTC by klik ♦35 |
| 172377794 (Comments: 3) | sillywalks (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ich kenne den westlichen Teil wie gesagt vom Vorbeifahren auf der Bundesstraße, den östlichen Teil bin ich auch schon mit der Fahrrad gefahren. Meiner Erinnerung nach ist "Mühlenstraße" nur innerhalb des Ortsgebietes v... commented 2025-10-08 09:51:02 UTC by klik ♦35 |
| 172990167 (Comments: 2) | stukulele (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you, those are good edits! commented 2025-10-08 09:49:32 UTC by stukulele ♦2 |
| 171491822 (Comments: 4) | ordinatous (Discussed changesets: 5) | C'est une excellente démarche, merci beaucoup à toi d'y avoir pensé commented 2025-10-08 09:47:12 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦156 |
| 172991111 (Comments: 1) | Project srl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Project srl, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. Quindi hai 2 opzioni: <... commented 2025-10-08 09:46:34 UTC by demon_box ♦372 |
| 171719223 (Comments: 1) | Cam Mockelyn (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour, j'ai vu plusieurs intégration de chaucidou avec lanes = 2, on devrait plutôt mettre lanes = 1 ? A moins qu'il y est bien 2 lignes ainsi qu'une ligne de démarcation, mais à ce moment là on est ... commented 2025-10-08 09:46:18 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦176 |
| 172947219 (Comments: 2) | AndiUhl (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi. Am Begin des Weges ist ein Schild "Alpiner Steig". Es geht direkt steil über felsigen Boden. Für Gravel wie gesagt unfahrbar. Es beginnt auch ein Geländer am Rand des Weges. Weitergeschoben habe ich nicht. commented 2025-10-08 09:42:17 UTC by AndiUhl ♦2 |
| 172976950 (Comments: 1) | youmadrir123@ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi youmadrir123@, Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets. However, based on the Vantor satellite imagery (via Vantor Hub, dated 2025-10-06), and (Es... commented 2025-10-08 09:41:55 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 172960958 (Comments: 1) | AndreaBarb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao e benvenuto! Le cose che in italiano le chiamiamo “monumenti” in OpenStreetMap sono distinte in due tipologie principali, historic=memorial e historic=monument. Quello che si vede è un memorial nei termini di OpenStreetMap, i ... commented 2025-10-08 09:40:18 UTC by dieterdreist ♦863 |
| 172947124 (Comments: 2) | AndiUhl (Discussed changesets: 4) | Der Weg ist kaum ersichtlich. Eine Beschilderung gibt es nicht. Kein normaler Mensch würde da durchgehen. Der unterste Teil ist ca. 15% Steigung, dann flacht er etwas ab. Den S4 Trail hochzuschieben, der den Weg kreuzt war deutlich einfacher. commented 2025-10-08 09:38:33 UTC by AndiUhl ♦2 |
| 172890944 (Comments: 1) | Richiec120 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed you changed Silverstone Circuit from highway=raceway to highway=secondary. Could you explain why? As it’s a closed race circuit, raceway seems more appropriate commented 2025-10-08 09:36:58 UTC by SwiftElm02 ♦1 |
| 171902410 (Comments: 1) | GeorgeKaplan (Discussed changesets: 47) | Bonjour, au niveau de l'arret de bus La Roupie, j'ai tracé la piste et supprimé le tag cycleway:left = track, par contre j'ai remis cycleway:right = lane, car la bande ne me semble pas étre effacé, à ... commented 2025-10-08 09:34:57 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦176 |
| 172916137 (Comments: 3) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hay que comprobar si hay una señalización o normativa que deniegue el acceso a las bicicletas, hacia dónde dirige ese marcador de ruta, y qué factores han cambiado para cambiar la clasificación de esas vías. ... commented 2025-10-08 09:34:31 UTC by MarinoBM ♦107 |
| 172972170 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. Исправила, спасибо! commented 2025-10-08 09:33:27 UTC by Ozon OSM17 ♦1 |
| 172968994 (Comments: 1) | orto75 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao caro, Noi non inseriamo i civici dentro al edificio, perfavore mappa il civico dove si trova realmente (In questo caso dove c'è la targhetta "12"), se hai bisogno di altro contattami pure =D commented 2025-10-08 09:22:32 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦100 |
| 172871191 (Comments: 3) | JuanCarlos80 (Discussed changesets: 72) | Das problem das du hier im Routing/Navigation erzeugst ist das sobald der User an dem jetzigen Abzweigungspunkt vorbei ist die Navigation ihm nicht mehr die option anbietet aufzufahren weil es dort keine möglichkeit mehr gibt. D.h. fü... commented 2025-10-08 09:11:47 UTC by flohoff ♦2,384 |
| 170634481 (Comments: 1) | GPX Speedtag (Discussed changesets: 187) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13078466119 warum foot=no ? Grüße Chris commented 2025-10-08 09:07:35 UTC by chris66 ♦412 |
| 172975235 (Comments: 1) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please put more heart into mapping quality than wasting space in changeset description. Reverted because the main OSM basemap is not a place for such a bad solutions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172993177 commented 2025-10-08 09:07:10 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦252 |
| 172975494 (Comments: 2) | mtorchiano (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ho visto l'errore, l'intersezione non era giusta, c'era un pezzo fuori. Per il ruolo "route", era un refuso: è la prima volta che creo una route e nei primi pezzi non sapevo cosa mettere. Risolto entrambi... commented 2025-10-08 09:04:29 UTC by mtorchiano ♦3 |
| 172875444 (Comments: 1) | Powered-Technical (Discussed changesets: 6) | Non-compliant with open-source rules Here is how we got here, Copyright © Devonport City Council 2024. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172888197#map=19/-41.177646/146.340103 ... commented 2025-10-08 08:53:27 UTC by Powered-Technical ♦6 |
| 172764914 (Comments: 1) | ZLima12 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi ZLima12, If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth. I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community forums at... commented 2025-10-08 08:50:37 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,356 |
| 172934259 (Comments: 1) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi matthewfecica, If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth. I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community for... commented 2025-10-08 08:50:31 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,356 |
| 172954071 (Comments: 2) | desantoelectric (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I reverted your SPAM entry, because you destroy a street. See https://www.osm.org/changeset/172992470. commented 2025-10-08 08:46:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172306184 (Comments: 1) | NxPFoto (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo NxPFoto, Respekt für Deine detaillierte Arbeit an dem Mehrgenerationenspielplatz Haldorf. Ich habe aber Zweifel, dass das landuse=meadow hier noch korrekt ist ;) Bestimmt hast Du das nur vergessen zu entfernen. Gruß ... commented 2025-10-08 08:44:40 UTC by klik ♦35 |
| 172875729 (Comments: 1) | Powered-Technical (Discussed changesets: 6) | This didn't utilise the imagery sourcing is incorrect. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172888197#map=19/-41.177646/146.340103 commented 2025-10-08 08:41:41 UTC by Powered-Technical ♦6 |
| 172634141 (Comments: 1) | JigAma (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, je ne retrouve pas de DSC sur cette partie https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=19.1/50.5726599/2.9346973&pic=7d4f3a88-7352-441e-87e6-8a1185390a7a&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=47.13/6.26/30 C'est nouveau ? commented 2025-10-08 08:38:26 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦176 |
| 170189751 (Comments: 5) | fmc_6 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Luftbild sollte ausreichen. Bei mir ist es nördlich etwa 0,9 m und südlich 0,75 m, wenn ich exklusive bordstein und markierung messe. commented 2025-10-08 08:34:52 UTC by FMC-Henri ♦26 |
| 165816393 (Comments: 1) | pps345 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 545 / 5,000 Ciao pps345 You've recorded the center points of individual cantons here. These center points can actually be calculated from the cantonal outlines (e.g., for Bern https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1686344 or Valais htt... commented 2025-10-08 08:33:15 UTC by habi ♦1,908 |
| 172888197 (Comments: 7) | Powered-Technical (Discussed changesets: 6) | I will utilise https://revert.monicz.dev/ to revert the offending change sets. So, all should be good. commented 2025-10-08 08:28:08 UTC by Powered-Technical ♦6 |
| 172976284 (Comments: 1) | mlmt (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, pour rappel le commentaire que je vous ai adressé (sic) il y a 1 an sans réponse et surtout sans corrections: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153669381 Bien à vous commented 2025-10-08 08:25:55 UTC by divaddivag ♦120 |
| 110717308 (Comments: 2) | segi (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ahoj. Prešiel som to a poopravoval. commented 2025-10-08 08:10:31 UTC by segi ♦37 |
| 172977325 (Comments: 1) | inquisitornaega (Discussed changesets: 3) | Great job! commented 2025-10-08 08:06:45 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172990697 (Comments: 1) | Mehmet KERİMOĞLU (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba Mehmet KERİMOĞLU, hoşgeldiniz ve katkılarınız için teşekkür ederiz! İşbirliğini kolaylaştırmak ve diğerlerinin düzenlemelerinizi anlamalarına yardımcı olmak için yaptığınız değişikliklere k... commented 2025-10-08 08:06:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172990921 (Comments: 1) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 99) | https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia-zielona-gora/mamy-umowe-na-realizacje-obwodnicy-kostrzyna-nad-odra commented 2025-10-08 08:06:11 UTC by Yunkers ♦394 |
| 172887170 (Comments: 4) | DaDiC_88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh thanks very kind, but I've made the mistake, I wouldn't burden you. commented 2025-10-08 08:02:53 UTC by DaDiC_88 ♦1 |
| 172675204 (Comments: 15) | donovaly (Discussed changesets: 36) | Open SC, go to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227493587 and find its address quest. I wasn't able to. Possibly because the Billa node already has an address. Now, using Nominatim search for "бул. Черни връх 94". I... commented 2025-10-08 07:53:14 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 172990048 (Comments: 1) | Gilbert Nathan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Gilbert Nathan, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your ... commented 2025-10-08 07:46:30 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172958779 (Comments: 1) | Allen@Xylem (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please do not draw one house over a row of houses, but each house individually (as far as the aerial photographs allow). If necessary, a corresponding key note is also sufficient. commented 2025-10-08 07:44:33 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172964955 (Comments: 1) | Sandy McKinley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5970720736 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-10-08 07:40:53 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172982433 (Comments: 1) | BitPinhall (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-08 07:36:16 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 172650369 (Comments: 7) | kate_rocketdata (Discussed changesets: 198) | отлично, спасибо commented 2025-10-08 07:35:49 UTC by 4004 ♦1,906 |
| 172982959 (Comments: 3) | 旧加卷 (Discussed changesets: 3) | @Supaplex 感谢提醒，后续的相关编辑将会注意提醒 commented 2025-10-08 07:34:59 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦13 |
| 172980385 (Comments: 1) | Mithious29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/8825643799 (a tree) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! commented 2025-10-08 07:31:44 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172694533 (Comments: 5) | Palary (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi HellMap, Thank you for the detailed explanation on the exceptions. This is a valuable learning for me and my teammates. commented 2025-10-08 07:22:14 UTC by Palary ♦19 |
| 172869614 (Comments: 3) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 185) | Thank you for pointing out the forum posts. However, I will need to translate them first in order to understand the discussion. Nevertheless, the question remains as to why ref:NL:bgt is not being used. Are the ref:bgt to be renamed over time? commented 2025-10-08 06:57:50 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,076 |
| 172951367 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 421) | Bonjour, Merci de votre alerte, une correction a été effectuée Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-10-08 06:51:53 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦252 |
| 172937807 (Comments: 2) | Barry Stevenson (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have now fixed all in this changeset commented 2025-10-08 06:48:38 UTC by nevw ♦2,048 |
| 169579063 (Comments: 8) | scai (Discussed changesets: 26) | Perfekt, danke! commented 2025-10-08 06:41:51 UTC by burrscurr ♦89 |
| 172980892 (Comments: 1) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt? commented 2025-10-08 06:41:12 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,080 |
| 172980901 (Comments: 1) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt? commented 2025-10-08 06:41:05 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,080 |
| 172980902 (Comments: 1) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt? commented 2025-10-08 06:40:56 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,080 |
| 172980926 (Comments: 1) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt? commented 2025-10-08 06:40:48 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,080 |
| 172981054 (Comments: 1) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt? commented 2025-10-08 06:40:39 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,080 |
| 172978439 (Comments: 1) | Stefan535is14 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Stefan. Zo doormappen levert alleen maar gefronste wenkbrauwen op binnen de OSM Community. Het doet ook verder niets in OSM. Lees de tips svp door en ga dan aan de slag. Dit kan beter allemaal weg. Geef concreet aan wat je doet.. My map... commented 2025-10-08 06:01:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172923328 (Comments: 4) | Misiek_G (Discussed changesets: 29) | Padła propozycja wycofania tej zmiany w całości choć jeżeli ktoś chce i może to da się część ale wymaga to trochę wysiłku i wkładu w poprawę np. wspomnianych budynków. Jeżeli sam poprawisz to napisz nawet jeden wyraz w ... commented 2025-10-08 06:00:20 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦538 |
| 172978539 (Comments: 1) | Stefan535is14 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback: Het is mogekijk om wegen als vlakken re taggen, maar niet zo. Je zult dan de weg moeten specificeren. Dat is niet... commented 2025-10-08 05:57:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172908523 (Comments: 3) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 5) | Okay, I moved leisure=playground to the line and deleted the relation. In my experience iD often isn't great about adding unnecessary relations automatically. I think this sometimes happens when you hit "combine features" with an area ... commented 2025-10-08 04:33:38 UTC by pwbriggs ♦76 |
| 172888746 (Comments: 1) | Paul Fisher (Discussed changesets: 2) | the thing i’m unsure about on this is the exact labelling of the roundabout. I’ve tagged it as if the routes continue through the circle; should they end on either side? commented 2025-10-08 04:18:13 UTC by Paul Fisher ♦2 |
| 172515037 (Comments: 3) | FlipRevealer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Awesome, thank you for confirming. I updated the business. Happy mapping! commented 2025-10-08 04:10:52 UTC by pwbriggs ♦76 |
| 172983760 (Comments: 1) | Grab(TH)_Tanyamai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Grab(TH)_Tanyamai, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 12 landuse(') Could you please... commented 2025-10-08 03:38:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172983512 (Comments: 1) | Grab(TH)_Tanyamai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Grab(TH)_Tanyamai, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 16 landuse(') Could you please... commented 2025-10-08 03:22:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172948409 (Comments: 1) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 11) | Review as requested: way/1436136343 is crossing multiple buildings and does not match the bing imagery that you listed as the source --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172948409 |
| 172977762 (Comments: 1) | unseatedcardboard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions! commented 2025-10-08 02:58:14 UTC by citrula ♦958 |
| 170276005 (Comments: 1) | AndiUhl (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AndiUhl, gibt es eine Beschilderung, die ein "access=no" rechtfertigt? access=no ist eine Vollsperrung! VG commented 2025-10-08 02:50:14 UTC by pitfire ♦690 |
| 172983070 (Comments: 1) | Grab(TH)_Tanyamai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Grab(TH)_Tanyamai, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 9 landuse(') Could you please ... commented 2025-10-08 02:48:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172935045 (Comments: 3) | ruhland (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, my mistake, I was looking at the OSM rendering which is the same as a deleted way in OSMCha.org. I appologize for misundersanding the rendering. Good luck mapping. --- Published using OSMCha... commented 2025-10-08 02:12:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 169885872 (Comments: 1) | setokynet (Discussed changesets: 6) | あなたが編集した時点で既に撤去されている、砂川の芳野橋の架け替えのための仮設橋を復活させないでください。 あなたが参考にした Bing の画像の状態からは工事が進んでいて... commented 2025-10-08 01:57:02 UTC by obache ♦11 |
| 172789191 (Comments: 1) | MihaelIvanjek (Discussed changesets: 30) | Reverted the changeset because of an unnecessary split. #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172982457 commented 2025-10-08 01:53:28 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦5 |
| 172936925 (Comments: 1) | britishmetric144 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172936925 commented 2025-10-08 01:50:49 UTC by Glassman ♦5,432 |
| 138324446 (Comments: 4) | valhikes (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yes, move the junction if it is in the wrong place. The register is a good sign you found the right trail. source= (should be source:geometry) tells you I got this route from USFS data, which I download from their "clearinghouse". If you ha... commented 2025-10-08 01:42:33 UTC by valhikes ♦18 |
| 172979915 (Comments: 1) | jay_gray (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset: 172979915 Sunningdale, Trail BC: digitized building footprints for GIS310 Assignment 5 using Esri World Imagery (#SelkirkCollege #GIS310) commented 2025-10-08 01:37:09 UTC by jay_gray ♦1 |
| 172981622 (Comments: 1) | BlauerRothirsch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Names of buildings deleted, as they were not the correct ones but only served as temporary orientation for me. I forgot to remove them before uploading. commented 2025-10-08 00:49:43 UTC by BlauerRothirsch ♦2 |
| 172580884 (Comments: 3) | Rukasu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Most highway=pedestrian can be used by other modes and can fit motorized vehicles, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian for examples. Given that hw=pedestrian is used for this situation both elsewhere in Rock Creek Park (h... commented 2025-10-08 00:41:10 UTC by willkmis ♦180 |
| 172877459 (Comments: 4) | tiagofidalgo (Discussed changesets: 3) | May I ask you not to change these and any other Santander POIs please, until https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/11441 takes effect? The editor should hopefully stop suggesting those changes soon. commented 2025-10-08 00:16:16 UTC by mikedld ♦28 |
| 172926903 (Comments: 1) | Heptazane (Discussed changesets: 6) | The fairweather should have four levels with the first floor being a garage/foyer. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels commented 2025-10-08 00:00:42 UTC by Hans Thompson ♦113 |
| 172938826 (Comments: 1) | TheBestIdea (Discussed changesets: 68) | Hey! Technically it is a one way but the north side of the bridge is closed. So folks are traveling two ways on this path. Would keep it two way so that routing works. commented 2025-10-07 23:52:30 UTC by zhik ♦19 |
| 172698620 (Comments: 1) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980912 commented 2025-10-07 23:46:04 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172697443 (Comments: 1) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980912 commented 2025-10-07 23:46:03 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172697859 (Comments: 1) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980912 commented 2025-10-07 23:46:03 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172698383 (Comments: 1) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980912 commented 2025-10-07 23:46:03 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172698541 (Comments: 1) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980912 commented 2025-10-07 23:46:03 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172698434 (Comments: 1) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980912 commented 2025-10-07 23:46:03 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172698246 (Comments: 1) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980912 commented 2025-10-07 23:46:03 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172698134 (Comments: 1) | ReiT (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980912 commented 2025-10-07 23:46:03 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,128 |
| 172955864 (Comments: 1) | Chris0876 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980781 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen commented 2025-10-07 23:38:59 UTC by Bienson ♦327 |
| 172955811 (Comments: 1) | Chris0876 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172980781 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen commented 2025-10-07 23:38:52 UTC by Bienson ♦327 |
| 169956504 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 262) | Neviem preco musia byt vsetky tie cesty 'service'. Tie najvacsie pomenovane tahy mohli zostat 'unclassified' ak uz teda nie 'residential'. A hlavne zabudli zmenit vela kratkych usekov. commented 2025-10-07 23:25:26 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 169687045 (Comments: 1) | sibunus (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdravim, na tejto zastavke stoji nejaky autobus MHD? Uvadzajte prosim zdroj udajov, kedze tu ako jediny ste uviedli Ortofoto a tam nazov zastavky nevidite. A tiez prosim zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien ako len "uprava". Pozrite ht... commented 2025-10-07 23:20:49 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,671 |
| 172849169 (Comments: 2) | Adze1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Yes. Immediately after adding I saw that there was an Amazon locker very close by. I was driving and my passenger was talking to me when we passed, so maybe I got it wrong. I'll be passing again sometime & will pay proper attention! commented 2025-10-07 22:23:13 UTC by Adze1 ♦10 |
| 172979105 (Comments: 1) | mmicheli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi mmicheli, welcome and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work a... commented 2025-10-07 22:06:37 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172979169 (Comments: 1) | Mikiss444 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-10-07 22:00:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172948051 (Comments: 1) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, Just wondered - do you know what the difference is between https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/123318 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19284290 ? They both look like superroutes of NCN5, but with slightly different constituent... commented 2025-10-07 21:57:56 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 172938812 (Comments: 1) | JaxxC (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, same as my comment on the other changeset, but in this case I'd separate the building out into it's own object with just building=yes, and remove it from the outside way. --- Published using... commented 2025-10-07 21:53:18 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,356 |
| 172977205 (Comments: 2) | Jakubowsky (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-10-07 21:53:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172938866 (Comments: 1) | JaxxC (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the building=yes tag should only be added if the way just marks the building. I'd recommend shrinking the way to just the building. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/17293... commented 2025-10-07 21:52:41 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,356 |
| 160882732 (Comments: 9) | Caerandir (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alles klar, danke dir ! Ich denke, wir haben uns in RLP nach diesen Jahren des Warten den DOP20-Bilder wirklich verdient :) Bing und ESRI sind nicht nur deutlich unschärfer, sondern auch vielerorts nicht aktuell. Hillshade hilft auch sehr... commented 2025-10-07 21:49:59 UTC by limes11 ♦953 |
| 163876413 (Comments: 5) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 53) | Leider disqualifizierst Du Dich mit derartigen Kommentaren selbst. Allein schon Dein erster Link zeigt wie falsch Du teilweise bei den Ridges liegst: "a hill or mountain landform with a continuous elevated crest (Kammlinie!). The sides of th... commented 2025-10-07 21:24:18 UTC by ghaefele ♦14 |
| 172900233 (Comments: 1) | NTTrailsMEE (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-07 21:22:17 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,469 |
| 126905017 (Comments: 2) | IronArtex (Discussed changesets: 5) | The modification to node MEI67 looks incorrect. ADSL is not a telecom medium but rather a protocol. Likely this change should be reverted (back to fibre) or changed to copper. commented 2025-10-07 21:14:23 UTC by falcon2 ♦1 |
| 172973210 (Comments: 5) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | "Was will uns Tobias damit sagen... :(" - https://community.openstreetmap.org/faq "But remember to criticize ideas, not people." commented 2025-10-07 21:10:23 UTC by Tobias Conradi ♦5 |
| 167638973 (Comments: 2) | nsr2osm (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sorry, by "this" I meant Node 10831198808 bikuben. commented 2025-10-07 21:08:04 UTC by jcrow ♦5 |
| 172975725 (Comments: 1) | Mikiss444 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place... commented 2025-10-07 20:52:34 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172975617 (Comments: 1) | Railwayfan2005 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Dag Railwayfan, Wellicht concreet commentaar bij je updates. Dat wordt op prijs gesteld. MVG eggie commented 2025-10-07 20:48:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172973699 (Comments: 1) | Eastwood7891 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-07 20:45:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 170639732 (Comments: 2) | Cèparlà (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, c’est régularisé en route résidentielles et complété. Cordialement commented 2025-10-07 20:45:27 UTC by Cèparlà ♦6 |
| 172901134 (Comments: 2) | Oviedo1997 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tienes razón que el ayuntamiento lo incluye como barrio, desconocía esto. En mi opinión, el Parque de Invierno nunca ha sido un barrio de Oviedo, sino un parque (como su propio nombre indica) ubicado en el barrio de San Lá... commented 2025-10-07 20:38:02 UTC by Oviedo1997 ♦3 |
| 172851879 (Comments: 1) | zooMolga (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. In this changeset you named the feature "Dragonfly World" Could you provide a source for this information? commented 2025-10-07 20:36:29 UTC by MassCartog ♦191 |
| 169707300 (Comments: 3) | djykr (Discussed changesets: 3) | 我看到的时候就删掉了，而且不管是不是恶意形式，当事人知情不知情，都是不要这样作的，哪怕就是当事人知道这件事而且点头了（甚至觉得哎呀我被画到地图里挺好的），那它也是不符... commented 2025-10-07 20:31:57 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦540 |
| 172946319 (Comments: 1) | Elischer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, zu diesem Änderungssatz eine formelle und eine inhaltliche Anmerkung. Als Quelle gibst du „Gemeinde GIS“ an. Du hattest bereits geschrieben: „die Daten wurden durch einzelne Vermessungen erhoben welche für... commented 2025-10-07 20:23:27 UTC by rempshaener ♦978 |
| 161747406 (Comments: 1) | fdn23 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour fdn23, Merci pour toutes tes contributions. Je me permets deux remarques qui se veulent constructives ;-) Les "name" sur les landuse=residential ne sont pas rendus, il est donc préférable de ne pas mettre de name... commented 2025-10-07 20:20:16 UTC by zorglubu ♦342 |
| 172915672 (Comments: 1) | tatarinovms (Discussed changesets: 4) | Имя только для собственных имен. Например “Александровский дворец” или “Магнит”. А вот местные названия, номера домов или тип... commented 2025-10-07 20:20:04 UTC by s777n ♦302 |
| 172915364 (Comments: 1) | tatarinovms (Discussed changesets: 4) | Улицу в данном случае стоило написать на русском. Исправил. commented 2025-10-07 20:15:44 UTC by s777n ♦302 |
| 172915248 (Comments: 1) | tatarinovms (Discussed changesets: 4) | Вы поменяли имя но поменяли тип магазина. Исправил. commented 2025-10-07 20:12:45 UTC by s777n ♦302 |
| 172740819 (Comments: 8) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 19) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172976309#map=15/50.56500/3.18438&layers=N commented 2025-10-07 20:10:31 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦18 |
| 172916021 (Comments: 1) | tatarinovms (Discussed changesets: 4) | Здравсвуйте. Вы продублировали банкомат. Удалил. commented 2025-10-07 20:09:23 UTC by s777n ♦302 |
| 172970497 (Comments: 1) | Ju de Pessoux (Discussed changesets: 1) | oneway pour tous ? vélo ? mobylette ? commented 2025-10-07 20:04:11 UTC by Jakka ♦1,825 |
| 172949541 (Comments: 3) | Michał Górny (Discussed changesets: 2) | ❤️❤️ commented 2025-10-07 19:59:19 UTC by Yog Sot ♦316 |
| 144969564 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 262) | Ahoj, bola tam značka zákaz vjazdu pre všetky vozidlá v oboch smeroch, ale je tam len jedna značka. Je to cesta 3. triedy, ale je to skôr poľná cesta, na niektorých úsekoch zúžená.<... commented 2025-10-07 19:58:07 UTC by mapperue ♦230 |
| 172966667 (Comments: 1) | PumpkinPieAficionado (Discussed changesets: 6) | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-05-06 commented 2025-10-07 19:44:34 UTC by PumpkinPieAficionado ♦6 |
| 172687072 (Comments: 12) | Tobias Conradi (Discussed changesets: 14) | @Tobias Conradi OSM lebt und wächst damit, daß man sich austauscht... Deinen Link betrachte ich als Ausrede... Ich kritisiere nicht dich, sondern deine Idee, sowie mehr noch deine Art und Weise deiner Umsetzung! Ich kritisiere die ... commented 2025-10-07 19:28:45 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,080 |
 | 172974579 (Comments: 1) | Ankon10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Ankon10, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 highway(s) Could you please confirm if these... commented 2025-10-07 19:23:34 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172954519 (Comments: 1) | vellare (Discussed changesets: 5) | Не потрібно давати назви будівлям, ще й російською commented 2025-10-07 19:15:38 UTC by kamasytrix ♦41 |
| 171610731 (Comments: 1) | adjuva (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hallo adjuva, vielen Dank für die vielen Verbesserungen! Bei der Einarbeitung einer Quelle in den Wikipedia-Artikel zum Betriebsbahnhof Burgsinn stach mir ein Widerspruch zu den offenen Bahn-Geodaten ins Auge. Laut der in Wikipedia verarbeite... commented 2025-10-07 19:08:49 UTC by bigbug21 ♦150 |
| 172817284 (Comments: 4) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Потвърждавам казаното от Fraxi. Като направих моите първи 400-500 промени, прегледах най-първите си и се чудех какви съм ги вършил :). commented 2025-10-07 18:52:56 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦715 |
| 171940190 (Comments: 1) | Leida Torres (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Leida! Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your contribution. I have fixed a few of the buildings you added by changing the "area=yes" to "building=yes" and a few other fixes. But I wonder what natural=2025 ... commented 2025-10-07 18:47:50 UTC by gormur ♦125 |
| 172959231 (Comments: 1) | Николай Кейдо (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-10-07 18:44:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,623 |
| 172729350 (Comments: 4) | DrDragoN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Снежный микрорайон https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18928805/history В версии 2 Вы добавили много улиц и домиков, которые явно не нужны в мультиполигоне.<... commented 2025-10-07 18:41:16 UTC by Grass-snake ♦243 |
| 166993997 (Comments: 2) | Poliana Rezende Costa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for the correction and the tip! commented 2025-10-07 18:40:00 UTC by Poliana Rezende Costa ♦2 |
| 165231905 (Comments: 1) | carfeely (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your contribution. In this changeset, you changed a tag from addr:housenumber to natural What does natural=209 mean? Is the house number not 209? commented 2025-10-07 18:36:03 UTC by gormur ♦125 |
| 167048238 (Comments: 2) | Poliana Rezende Costa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for your comment! The OSM platform appears to me in Portuguese (Brazilian). Natural= tree, which means tree in my language. commented 2025-10-07 18:21:17 UTC by Poliana Rezende Costa ♦2 |
| 172928395 (Comments: 1) | LaLinea (Discussed changesets: 28) | Revert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172972241 Ein Geschäft namens Feature Store existiert dort nicht. Bitte nicht aufgrund einer Meldung bzw. Vermutung eintragen. commented 2025-10-07 18:19:11 UTC by Rainero ♦596 |
| 163779728 (Comments: 1) | geoglorus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! What does natural=06 28 57 19 43 mean on the Cheverie de l'Est ? commented 2025-10-07 18:00:49 UTC by gormur ♦125 |
| 172896256 (Comments: 7) | Paul van der Heijden (Discussed changesets: 11) | ...emergency=yes toegevoegd. Het zal nu in apps als LiveNav moet routeren. commented 2025-10-07 17:55:10 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 170264277 (Comments: 1) | SYRY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your contribution. In this changeset, you added two ways and tagged them with something like "natural=1". I'm not quite sure what you mean with these tags. What are these objects? commented 2025-10-07 17:53:10 UTC by gormur ♦125 |
| 166039176 (Comments: 6) | I-Izzo (Discussed changesets: 18) | Looking at some of the local photos, it does look like those kerbs are "lowered" on all the nodes that you edited here. 👍 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176 |
| 169706346 (Comments: 1) | djykr (Discussed changesets: 3) | 例如 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418599617 这样的学校，operator如果要写也应该是主管机构，而非校长的名字。另一方面也是因为人事调动可能会很频繁，osm不是一切信息的收集场所。另一方面... commented 2025-10-07 17:41:23 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦540 |
| 172904035 (Comments: 1) | TMomä (Discussed changesets: 3) | name-kenttään ei ole suotavaa lisätä tällaisia "kuvailevia" nimiä. Ne on ensisijaisesti varattu virallisille kyltitetyille nimille. commented 2025-10-07 17:39:17 UTC by houtari ♦52 |
| 169590405 (Comments: 1) | djykr (Discussed changesets: 3) | OSM不是开玩笑的地方 commented 2025-10-07 17:36:21 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦540 |
 | 171986408 (Comments: 2) | Sandalss (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Aleksander, I was using the province boundaries of Qurayyat from the Muscat GIS map layer and the ArcGIS boundaries layer that contained the other governorates provinces boundaries. The problem is the Dama wa at Ta'ieen Province overla... commented 2025-10-07 17:34:28 UTC by Sandalss ♦4 |
| 169510480 (Comments: 1) | Airiver (Discussed changesets: 6) | а что за тропы поверх воды? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893257066 commented 2025-10-07 17:18:58 UTC by skadi ♦11 |
| 172968400 (Comments: 1) | PLGedit (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi. Please use ESRI standard as imegery. Is the best centered and the newest in Romania. Thank you. commented 2025-10-07 17:18:17 UTC by rarad74 ♦298 |
| 172822347 (Comments: 2) | Mapping_Maślice (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nie są, co najwyżej można mieć rower albo wózek. To mały prom. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BQtxamnjk/ Można dać motor_vehicle=no. commented 2025-10-07 17:13:18 UTC by pavvv ♦558 |
| 171476567 (Comments: 2) | SevierLake (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola AgusQui, Gracias por contactarme. Voy a quitar las etiquetas foot=no y lo tendré en cuenta la próxima vez. commented 2025-10-07 17:11:21 UTC by SevierLake ♦1 |
| 172504059 (Comments: 1) | Numan Irriducibili (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravo Numan Irriducibili, Poništiću tvoje promene jer si obrisao naziv mesta koji je bio ispravno unet. Ako imaš problem sa pronalaženjem nekog mesta, javi na Telegram kanal osm_sr, pa ćemo da proverimo o čemu se radi. |
| 172968501 (Comments: 2) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Comme expliqué sur ce changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172932391 ****ELLE EST ENCORE EN CONSTRUCTION**** commented 2025-10-07 16:57:42 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172968631 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Comment ça cycleway?? C'est une service road, pas une voie cyclable... je ne comprends plus rien à tes edits, ils ont l'air très aléatoires. Si tu continues comme ça je serai obligé de te signaler a... commented 2025-10-07 16:55:13 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172860835 (Comments: 1) | pera210 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravo pero210, Da li ima neki razlog zašto si ostavio ovu liniju umesto da je obrišeš: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421351311 Uzgred, veoma bi mi značilo ukoliko bi komentar changeseta bio nešt... commented 2025-10-07 16:49:03 UTC by MaliMrav ♦50 |
| 172955600 (Comments: 2) | PLB27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pardonne-moi de ne pas avoir remarqué que tu es nouveau et de ne pas t’avoir souhaité la bienvenue sur OSM. commented 2025-10-07 16:46:22 UTC by aTarom ♦815 |
| 172968141 (Comments: 1) | Malik Shahbaz iqbal (Discussed changesets: 1) | excellebt commented 2025-10-07 16:42:54 UTC by Malik Shahbaz iqbal ♦1 |
| 172861782 (Comments: 5) | asdf999 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke. Es ist toll zu hören, dass du dich um die Aktualisierung der Daten kümmerst. commented 2025-10-07 16:27:37 UTC by makiwolf ♦7 |
| 172766139 (Comments: 1) | Cknfeet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Not sure how 76th got deleted but I went and re-added it. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172766139 commented 2025-10-07 16:26:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,183 |
| 172926928 (Comments: 2) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 40) | corrected commented 2025-10-07 16:26:17 UTC by Bartek444 ♦17 |
 | 172966737 (Comments: 1) | Hadassa Teodoro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Calle Brasil esq, Concepción 010107 commented 2025-10-07 16:20:32 UTC by Hadassa Teodoro ♦1 |
| 172928142 (Comments: 1) | sashnikus_sashnikutus22229 (Discussed changesets: 16) | cześć Sashnikus. nie chce Ci tu zmieniać na siłę, lecz wydaje mi się że nadawanie widocznych nazw pobocznym drogom polnym lub podjazdom do budynku jest mocno mylące. W czasie edycji po naciśnięciu guziczka "geoportal: nazwy ulic" ... commented 2025-10-07 16:12:03 UTC by pan_borsuk ♦58 |
| 172960363 (Comments: 2) | Masha Shaykhutdinova (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! No :) actually it’s kinda terraced house with three flats with separated entrances. In docs it Maglajska, 7a, 7b etc. there is no just 7 entrance commented 2025-10-07 16:03:19 UTC by Masha Shaykhutdinova ♦1 |
| 172929121 (Comments: 1) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19684976. What is the mean of the tags codigo_via = 5501 last_update = 2011-01-01 length = 1118 pr_final = 21+1118 pr_inicial = 0 sector = Bogotá - Tocancipá |
| 170475356 (Comments: 1) | LAZACARTO (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, les pistes sont déja tracé, je remplace par cycleway:both = separate Bon mapping! Mathias commented 2025-10-07 15:52:48 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦176 |
| 170464132 (Comments: 1) | AlexC (Discussed changesets: 15) | Just a quick note to let you know that natural=riverbed is deprecated (see the wiki). I've reverted this edit. commented 2025-10-07 15:52:16 UTC by jfd553 ♦60 |
| 170692081 (Comments: 1) | Aurelien1685 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, j'ai corrigé et remis cycleway = no, en effet le double sens cyclable est en cohabitation il n'ya pas de bande cyclable, donc seul le tag oneway:bicycle = no permet d'indiquer le dsc. Pour les dsc avec bande cyclable, ... commented 2025-10-07 15:48:06 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦176 |
| 172965734 (Comments: 1) | trialanderror (Discussed changesets: 1) | Apologies for the missing changeset comment. Street parking data, surveyed on-site. commented 2025-10-07 15:45:55 UTC by trialanderror ♦1 |
| 172964785 (Comments: 1) | serdrar tazzarine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour serdrar tazzarine, bienvenue et merci pour votre contribution ! Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre vos modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une brève description des ... commented 2025-10-07 15:36:46 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 171747840 (Comments: 3) | I-Izzo (Discussed changesets: 18) | thank you commented 2025-10-07 15:31:49 UTC by dieterdreist ♦863 |
| 172924378 (Comments: 1) | joel1972 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hallo Joel, es sieht so aus, als ob die eingetragenen Öffnungszeiten für das Wein- und Kulturzentrum (13063939095) eigentlich zum POI der Verkaufsstelle des Winzervereins https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11867450392 passen. Der... commented 2025-10-07 15:27:55 UTC by ChristophH ♦6 |
| 172942393 (Comments: 1) | Mirko Drensek (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hola. Cuando el trozo de via que conecta un arroyo o rio, desde el borde del embalse hasta el siguiente curso de agua es muy largo, es decir dentro del embalse, lago o laguna, muchas veces sirve poner waterway=flowline. Con eso modelas el circuito fl... commented 2025-10-07 15:26:44 UTC by muralito ♦2,067 |
| 172964212 (Comments: 2) | 𝔸𝔹_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay.. will do it this week. commented 2025-10-07 15:22:26 UTC by 𝔸𝔹_ ♦5 |
| 172964624 (Comments: 1) | ricaestevao (Discussed changesets: 2) | correção do erro no córrego vinhedo commented 2025-10-07 15:21:19 UTC by ricaestevao ♦2 |
| 172686946 (Comments: 2) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 74) | US-20 through Massachusetts is an important route of the longest road in the United States. It runs along a toll-access and far-between-exits highway. It should be classified as trunk. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172964212 commented 2025-10-07 15:11:24 UTC by 𝔸𝔹_ ♦5 |
| 172893795 (Comments: 3) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 386) | That tagging is approximately what I would have suggested. Thanks! commented 2025-10-07 15:11:19 UTC by impiaaa ♦436 |
| 172737130 (Comments: 3) | michael60634 (Discussed changesets: 12) | I might have a photo somewhere in my google photos but it isn't indexed in a way I can easily access it. Here is a googlephoto sphere link that shows the area has some intention to it but it isn't readable. https://maps.app.goo.gl... commented 2025-10-07 15:08:46 UTC by Hans Thompson ♦113 |
| 172933564 (Comments: 1) | Andrei88888 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Salut. Aleile de acces in parcele private ale locatarilor sau curtile lor nu se fac folosind strada rezidentiala. Trebuie utilizat living street sau service road cu subtag-ul drivevay. S epoate pune inclusiv tag de acces privat. Nu se trage din drumu... commented 2025-10-07 15:07:32 UTC by rarad74 ♦298 |
| 168449567 (Comments: 2) | dbsus (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo Lukas, für einfache Tunnel bzw. Personenunterführungen kann man die Gebäudeeigenschaft sicher bestreiten, allerdings gibt es auch breite/komplexe Unterführungen mit abgehenden Geschäften oder Warteräumen un... commented 2025-10-07 15:03:19 UTC by dbsus ♦13 |
| 172941673 (Comments: 2) | Purple Feline (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm sorry. This ia a yearly halloween attraction, which is open a couple days around halloween. It is a private project by an event technician, but it's open to the public and free for entry. They are using animatronic puppets and bui... commented 2025-10-07 15:02:41 UTC by Purple Feline ♦1 |
| 172873559 (Comments: 2) | Bartek93ZGL (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thank you for pointing this out. The data you showed came from an import of administrative boundaries from the state geoportal. I've already removed it. My oversight. commented 2025-10-07 15:02:10 UTC by Bartek93ZGL ♦26 |
| 172962873 (Comments: 1) | Nthart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-07 14:59:17 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172955794 (Comments: 9) | Marcpersoon (Discussed changesets: 1) | key wikidata bus 33 aangepast naar network:wikidata commented 2025-10-07 14:58:07 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172958557 (Comments: 2) | eucora (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Added also alt_name so addresses are found either Caranfil or Caramfil. But done changing addresses also. Let me know if anything else needs to be updated accordingly to official city administration. commented 2025-10-07 14:52:59 UTC by eucora ♦2 |
| 172769066 (Comments: 1) | 15groszy (Discussed changesets: 2) | If you're really in the dark on how to classify something, highway=road works as "there's some kind of traversable way here but I can't tell/don't know what kind". --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-10-07 14:45:30 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,183 |
| 172930929 (Comments: 3) | Sołtys Wysoka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dodałeś park jako punkt na środku ulicy. Co chciałeś dodać? commented 2025-10-07 14:40:44 UTC by maro21 ♦739 |
 | 172837523 (Comments: 2) | JanezPavelZebovec (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, thank you very much for correction. Luckily this is my first and only electric scooter rental point. Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172962341 fixes it, I believe. commented 2025-10-07 14:32:02 UTC by JanezPavelZebovec ♦14 |
| 172959961 (Comments: 1) | ThingWing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-10-07 14:23:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172227788 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 77) | Okay then, thanks for the information! (And for correcting me on my typos 😅) commented 2025-10-07 14:21:20 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦102 |
| 172925444 (Comments: 3) | Marion_Moseby (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola! He visto que hay dos tipos de InserCoop: los Lábora y los normales. Lo he puesto así en el changeset #172949723, míralo si quieres y me dices. En el Source debería estar la fuente :p commented 2025-10-07 14:15:14 UTC by Marion_Moseby ♦9 |
| 172883254 (Comments: 1) | emre0717 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Park içindeki yolları neden sildiniz? Yanlışlıkla mı sildiniz? commented 2025-10-07 14:12:12 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦120 |
| 172945106 (Comments: 1) | Murali3 (Discussed changesets: 16) | two issues here, in general we do not use shortcodes in the main name of a object like N for north, second of all `/` is not an accepted way of adding multiple names to an object `;` is usually used for that, the issue here is that name should only h... commented 2025-10-07 14:11:30 UTC by Udarian ♦497 |
| 167252082 (Comments: 2) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi cuzi I corrected it now. It was not the only copy paste error that I did in that region. The other two I have found. BR Thomaso commented 2025-10-07 14:05:01 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦26 |
| 160964103 (Comments: 1) | Atalanttore (Discussed changesets: 23) | Why historical name "Arensburg" was moved from "old_name:de" to "name:de" here? "Arensburg" seem to be uncommon in modern German, this is why German Wikipedia also uses different name as article title. S... commented 2025-10-07 13:58:14 UTC by Pikse ♦206 |
| 168965601 (Comments: 2) | Jay May (Discussed changesets: 165) | Correction: "Wolmar" was in use until 1917 (not 2017), as per Polish Wikipedia. commented 2025-10-07 13:40:59 UTC by Pikse ♦206 |
| 172598604 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dear geopark mappers, why did you delete relevant wikipedia and wikidata tags? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172598604 commented 2025-10-07 13:37:58 UTC by sosquqer ♦2 |
| 172597480 (Comments: 1) | izu peninsula geopark (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dear mappers of the geopark! Thank you for your extensive efforts to get the English names on the map, I appreciate it both as a mapper and as an Izu visitor :) Can you please tell why did you delete the Wikidata tag from the temple in this change... commented 2025-10-07 13:32:22 UTC by sosquqer ♦2 |
| 172857276 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 885) | Yes, likely. Please feel free to improve further. My first step was to get these ~ 20 POIs from completely random tags to something useful. commented 2025-10-07 13:23:40 UTC by mueschel ♦6,681 |
| 172946984 (Comments: 1) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. El elemento que define a la Catedral de Málaga está aquí: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015333951. Atentamente, Daniel Capilla commented 2025-10-07 13:09:57 UTC by dcapillae ♦381 |
| 65695900 (Comments: 2) | WegefanHB (Discussed changesets: 31) | Wohl kaum. Bei der Bauwut. commented 2025-10-07 13:09:18 UTC by WegefanHB ♦13 |
| 172920981 (Comments: 2) | Hiking_User (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry if I wasnt clear. You performed the change that was needed. Thank you. Done. commented 2025-10-07 13:06:25 UTC by Hiking_User ♦1 |
| 67115451 (Comments: 3) | DiaouligRu (Discussed changesets: 20) | oui, bonne idée, je m'en occupe de suite. merci pour votre retour! commented 2025-10-07 12:49:25 UTC by enezeg ♦29 |
| 172947835 (Comments: 2) | Geeman58 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Bernard. You're correct; as a newcomer i didn't see the steps option and have amended accordingly. Still learning! Thanks, Gary commented 2025-10-07 12:34:48 UTC by Geeman58 ♦1 |
| 172936270 (Comments: 2) | TnWarrior (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172953712#map=13/36.75525/3.15908 commented 2025-10-07 12:29:48 UTC by TnWarrior ♦14 |
| 172935792 (Comments: 1) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 61) | Cześć, w sytuacji takiej jak na tym osiedlu byłbym zwolennikiem dodawania "living_street=yes" do już istniejącego otagowania. W ten sposób nie tracimy informacji o tym, czy dana droga strukturalnie powstała jako miejska ulic... commented 2025-10-07 12:19:22 UTC by czebureks ♦118 |
| 172878961 (Comments: 3) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Stp, renseigne toi sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:operator Operator permet d'indiquer l'organisation ou personne exploitant un objet. operator=station ne veut rien dire. Pas besoin d'ajouter operator aux e... commented 2025-10-07 12:18:42 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172950263 (Comments: 2) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 163) | Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. Chyba masz rację, że manewr zawracania tutaj nie jest zakazany. Nawet geometria skrzyżowania jest taka, że przy małym ruchu na Świętokrzyskiej nawet większym autem można się wyrobić. Usunąłem ją tutaj:... commented 2025-10-07 11:51:42 UTC by Marek-M ♦942 |
| 166039756 (Comments: 1) | edihoo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, irgendwas stimmt hier mit Hausnummern nicht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310486107 DU hast 12/1, 12/2, 14/1, 14/2, 16/1 und 16/2 vergeben. Aber diese Hausnummer sind hier neben an bereits eingetragen. Nun ist es doppelt. Was ist r... commented 2025-10-07 11:29:27 UTC by Znaika ♦119 |
| 172919854 (Comments: 2) | Руслан Т (Discussed changesets: 52) | Привет! СНТ присоединено к деревне, потому что по данным ЕГРН и ФИАС оно входит в её состав. Муниципальное деление: Московская област... commented 2025-10-07 11:27:40 UTC by Руслан Т ♦48 |
| 168892481 (Comments: 3) | ceirios (Discussed changesets: 16) | OK, it's the first time I've looked at names, and I felt, similarly to you, that it was backwards. As for the boundaries themselves, the first link shows land ownership, so it would only be appropriate to import that data into OSM i... commented 2025-10-07 11:26:34 UTC by mstrbrid ♦51 |
| 172943989 (Comments: 8) | NEWDH (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke nochmals für deine Hilfe. commented 2025-10-07 11:22:30 UTC by NEWDH ♦3 |
| 172847069 (Comments: 3) | cofounder unhitched perm stagnant (Discussed changesets: 2) | @pertile: en el futuro, mejorar la forma de redactar las sugerencias a nuevos participantes. Pensé que Google Maps era restrictivo pero observo que aquí el trato no es diferente. Buscaré otros mapas. commented 2025-10-07 11:19:48 UTC by cofounder unhitched perm stagnant ♦2 |
| 172945973 (Comments: 2) | karr4s (Discussed changesets: 15) | Salut, Oui, j'avoue qu'après de multiple réflexions, je suis convaincu par la clef "contact:*" faute de mieux afin d'éviter les doublons d'adressages. Je vais me focaliser sur les commerces du Cal... commented 2025-10-07 11:19:13 UTC by karr4s ♦43 |
| 172854842 (Comments: 2) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 27) | Исправлено commented 2025-10-07 11:10:01 UTC by addr: ♦26 |
| 172953696 (Comments: 1) | yasmin_kaua (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá yasmin_kaua, bem-vinda e obrigado pela sua contribuição! Para tornar a colaboração mais fácil e ajudar os outros a entender as suas edições, é melhor adicionar uma breve descri... commented 2025-10-07 11:07:03 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 172254873 (Comments: 2) | Partizanin (Discussed changesets: 3) | я роблю реверт охуїбала мене російська мова commented 2025-10-07 10:56:04 UTC by anti-caveman ♦27 |
| 172949868 (Comments: 1) | VMPanes (Discussed changesets: 61) | Fix: [Quezon City] commented 2025-10-07 10:55:35 UTC by VMPanes ♦20 |
| 172867941 (Comments: 1) | GIS-MAN (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello dear Ehsan commented 2025-10-07 10:27:56 UTC by GIS-MAN ♦1 |
| 172951962 (Comments: 1) | AlexandeR 290176 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Привет AlexandeR 290176, добро пожаловать и спасибо за ваш вклад! Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять ваши правки, луч... commented 2025-10-07 10:27:14 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,941 |
| 171772055 (Comments: 3) | SportsnatureBugeySud (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bonjour, merci pour votre intervention. Je me suis permis d'ajouter une relation propre à chaque randonnée car les boucles ont une identité à part entière. Je me suis aussi permis d'ajouter un résea... commented 2025-10-07 10:25:44 UTC by SportsnatureBugeySud ♦5 |
| 172899832 (Comments: 1) | divulmappeur (Discussed changesets: 9) | Merci pour les mises a jour commented 2025-10-07 10:24:05 UTC by eddynamite ♦2 |
| 171951305 (Comments: 2) | SportsnatureBugeySud (Discussed changesets: 6) | Oui, je l'ai vérifié sur place à plusieurs reprises, ce sentier parallèle a été ouvert cet automne pour éviter le chemin qui est rapidement boueux lorsque les engins forestiers l'utilisent. I... commented 2025-10-07 10:21:04 UTC by SportsnatureBugeySud ♦5 |
| 172947404 (Comments: 1) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 4) | What's the source of this information? As far as I know this is not a minor basilica. commented 2025-10-07 09:59:53 UTC by HantDX ♦28 |
| 172950477 (Comments: 1) | Konfarter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Źródło się rozsypało. Poprawny link: http://maps.mapywig.org/m/City_plans/Central_Europe/M-34-66,67,68,69_TARNUV_10K_1970.jpg commented 2025-10-07 09:51:20 UTC by Konfarter ♦3 |
| 167451917 (Comments: 3) | Sebastian Wallroth (Discussed changesets: 8) | Danke für die Antwort. Routen-Master¹ beinhalten normalerweise keine Haltestellen und Straßensegmente, sondern ausschließlich (Bus-)Linien. Die Linienvariante mit den zusätzlichen Haltestellen müsste man als eigenst&au... commented 2025-10-07 09:33:10 UTC by nw520 ♦159 |
| 172948854 (Comments: 1) | josephskull (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi... foot=yes is already default on cycleways in the Netherlands. Greetz.. eggie commented 2025-10-07 09:26:07 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |
| 172932391 (Comments: 1) | Hdidanox (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Hdidanox, Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! I noticed a change in classification for the street more than once. Going back to the recent imagery (Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-09-26), the road is still unde... commented 2025-10-07 09:25:09 UTC by nona mostafa ♦73 |
| 172942254 (Comments: 2) | Thundafox (Discussed changesets: 6) | rechts (nördlich) ist kein Radweg. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172942254 commented 2025-10-07 09:23:19 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,398 |
| X | 172910010 (Comments: 7) | API_SIS67_FME (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks Taya. Looks like my DM went unnoticed commented 2025-10-07 09:21:56 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,636 |
| X | 172946483 (Comments: 1) | API_SIS67_FME (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172948662 commented 2025-10-07 09:13:04 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,439 |
| 171781051 (Comments: 2) | alokchauhan_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | My name is Alok and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention & fixing my mistake. Agree with you, that there is a level difference between Pine Hills Road & East-West Expressway. Please accept ... commented 2025-10-07 09:06:22 UTC by alokchauhan_Lyft ♦1 |
 | 172923969 (Comments: 1) | xakimov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день К вам большая просьба, в адрес дома надо добавлять addr:street = название улицы, к которой данный дом относится commented 2025-10-07 09:02:51 UTC by Marych_ ♦191 |
 | 172947910 (Comments: 1) | СОНГОЛТ Авто засвар (Discussed changesets: 1) | Toyota hybrid засвар “СОНГОЛТ” commented 2025-10-07 08:54:42 UTC by СОНГОЛТ Авто засвар ♦1 |
| 172761559 (Comments: 2) | ihareg (Discussed changesets: 14) | Откатил удаление Дуполки. Как по мне, нет смысла удалять такие гидронимы, даже если эта река была мелиоризирована. commented 2025-10-07 08:48:59 UTC by HantDX ♦28 |
| 166812658 (Comments: 2) | Bozo_R5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Je suis nouveau sur OSM et je ne savais pas comment faire. Merci pour l'info ! Bonne journée commented 2025-10-07 08:47:53 UTC by Bozo_R5 ♦2 |
| 172871448 (Comments: 3) | schabanel (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ok, je viens de modifier. commented 2025-10-07 08:44:29 UTC by Syl ♦993 |
| 172365142 (Comments: 1) | scdhin (Discussed changesets: 21) | 没看到所谓的工业区 commented 2025-10-07 08:42:19 UTC by ljc_jlyb ♦43 |
| 172937649 (Comments: 1) | Abdelmalekkkkk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Abdelmalek, there's also a big portion to the west, until the roundabout, that's still called Avenue Mahjoubi Ahedrane. Was its name also change? commented 2025-10-07 08:39:53 UTC by ilias_ ♦309 |
| 172946477 (Comments: 3) | Kranczson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Usunąłem nazwę i przeniosłem numer identyfikacyjny do pola ref. commented 2025-10-07 08:33:13 UTC by Kranczson ♦1 |
| 172946275 (Comments: 1) | Pernycek (Discussed changesets: 4) | What's the source of this information? As far as I know this is not a minor basilica. commented 2025-10-07 08:25:12 UTC by HantDX ♦28 |
| 172933961 (Comments: 1) | Suavittá Comercio de Fraldas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-10-07 08:22:00 UTC by Comino ♦182 |
| 172939271 (Comments: 2) | Nplbepg (Discussed changesets: 1) | I deleted the other one too as you placed in in an apartment block in Footscay, Melbourne and tagged as being outdoor at Revesby Train Station in Sydney commented 2025-10-07 08:05:27 UTC by nevw ♦2,048 |
| 172933621 (Comments: 2) | doc_nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | clunhuistag teruggezet commented 2025-10-07 07:59:20 UTC by eggie ♦41,925 |