| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 170792862 (Comments: 2) | SunnyIsland10 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Greetings rhhs, I am attempting to create a safer pedestrian network across Bulgaria by applying foot=no tags where I notice segments are considered unsafe for pedestrian passage. I am attempting to follow similar logic used when adding in foo... commented 2025-08-22 21:11:49 UTC by SunnyIsland10 ♦28 |
 | 170796728 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 50) | What does landmark=3/10 mean? I don't see anything about that convention on the wiki commented 2025-08-22 21:08:05 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
 | 170851469 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 269) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dproposed commented 2025-08-22 21:05:16 UTC by theDM ♦117 |
| 161806254 (Comments: 1) | Iveta_vas (Discussed changesets: 6) | Fulton Market is the name on street signs for this section, which you can see in Streetside imagery. It's also used on the official Chicago GIS maps: https://gisapps.chicago.gov/mapchicago commented 2025-08-22 21:01:31 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 170848240 (Comments: 2) | Institute for Justice (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you can identify the brand of the ALPR you might also find the DeFlock documentation about how to add manufacturer information helpful: https://deflock.me/report/id commented 2025-08-22 20:48:41 UTC by citrula ♦896 |
 | 170802811 (Comments: 1) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ahoj, odporucam nemenit veci, ktore si realne nenavstivil. Priklad cislo 1 - ak by si bol niekedy na Lavobreznej, tak by si videl, ze prechod pre chodcov pri rozostavanom OC Klokan bol zruseny, aj ked zbrusenie ciar zebry bolo dost odflaknute, ... commented 2025-08-22 20:16:50 UTC by t_ja ♦209 |
| 170728989 (Comments: 2) | irik (Discussed changesets: 36) | Poprawione, dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi! commented 2025-08-22 20:14:15 UTC by irik ♦45 |
 | 170849584 (Comments: 1) | Sambalbij (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi .. Lijkt mij oke, maar de format van de openingstijden klopt niet. Gebruik anders deze 'tool': openingsuren-tool http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 20:13:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
 | 170838969 (Comments: 1) | AlexanderVolk8 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Привет! Спасибо за добавление объектов на карту. В будущем постарайтесь избегать правок с таким большим географическим разбросом об... commented 2025-08-22 20:09:43 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
 | 130225271 (Comments: 2) | ALu68 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Du hast das angelegt. Bitte äußere Dich. Danke und Grüße commented 2025-08-22 19:58:43 UTC by Scout Jens ♦279 |
| 170846102 (Comments: 1) | Test65789 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-22 19:52:03 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
 | 168570601 (Comments: 1) | Jiří Šimon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, jen chci upozornit, že čas se zadává specifickým způsobem (viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:opening_hours), jinak jsou pro programy nečitelné. Také si dávejte pozor na to abyste z budo... commented 2025-08-22 19:49:00 UTC by comfyquiettree ♦30 |
 | 144887733 (Comments: 2) | OSM19WVL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221681452/history/2 you have amenity=DWLLING What does that stand for? commented 2025-08-22 19:47:23 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
 | 28350380 (Comments: 1) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 83) | Hi. This is probably not a parking. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3305938771 Do you remember the place? commented 2025-08-22 19:46:06 UTC by muralito ♦2,047 |
| 170824729 (Comments: 1) | SimonBuchberger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10926207931 hast du jetzt einen bestehenden Hydranten mit der Straße verbunden. Ich möchte dich bitten, das zu unterlassen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-22 19:44:00 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170824922 (Comments: 1) | SimonBuchberger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, ich möchte meine Bitte noch einmal wiederholen: Hydranten werden nicht mit der Straße verbunden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-22 19:39:42 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
 | 170849654 (Comments: 1) | JLZIMMERMANN (Discussed changesets: 49) | j'ai rétabli en CD84 car c'est ainsi qu'il y a moins de risque d'erreur pour les requêtes tous les conseils départementaux se nomment ainsi en abrégé commented 2025-08-22 19:35:16 UTC by JLZIMMERMANN ♦116 |
| 163585540 (Comments: 1) | opendcc (Discussed changesets: 140) | Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1367156416#map=19/49.676166/10.807014 you have building=< What does that mean? Marc. commented 2025-08-22 19:34:42 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 148201078 (Comments: 1) | pittrichimica (Discussed changesets: 71) | Hi, here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268664173/history/2 You changed building from "yes" to "ss" What does that mean? (You did so on multiple other edits in this region). Marc. commented 2025-08-22 19:33:14 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
 | 170167929 (Comments: 2) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 49) | Sollte wahrscheinlich "Detail" heißen. Schau es Dir doch an. commented 2025-08-22 19:27:23 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦21 |
| 170821792 (Comments: 1) | Gonzo1192 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen: colour: Festwerte sind englisch definiert, hier also „red“ statt „Rot“. cou... commented 2025-08-22 19:26:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170739900 (Comments: 4) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 273) | Are you going to fix those? commented 2025-08-22 19:24:35 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
 | 169205239 (Comments: 3) | Atanas Angelov (Discussed changesets: 15) | Agreed, have submitted a report this evening. commented 2025-08-22 19:11:21 UTC by mstrbrid ♦42 |
| 170812134 (Comments: 1) | John-Carroll (Discussed changesets: 1) | Food trucks should be tagged as street_vendor=yes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3Dyes for more details on how to tag. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-08-22 19:11:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 168758657 (Comments: 1) | Atanas Angelov (Discussed changesets: 15) | Are cyclists permitted to go the other direction here?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152262096 commented 2025-08-22 19:09:52 UTC by mstrbrid ♦42 |
| 170830351 (Comments: 2) | Gummiphone (Discussed changesets: 1) | De gemeente Rotterdam gebruikt in ieder geval nog de naam Hillegersberg-Zuid https://www.woneninrotterdam.nl/lijstje/spelen-shoppen-en-borrelen-in-hillegersberg-zuid/ https://www.woneninrotterdam.nl/hillegersberg-schiebroek/hillegersberg-zu... commented 2025-08-22 19:07:53 UTC by emvee ♦376 |
| 153635546 (Comments: 1) | youbab (Discussed changesets: 25) | Vous avez ajouté destination = Montargis;Paris;Chartres destination:int_ref = E 5; E 60 destination:ref = A 10 à plusieurs voies. Ça semble incorrect. commented 2025-08-22 19:05:53 UTC by sostock ♦4 |
| 170830839 (Comments: 3) | hmkaiser (Discussed changesets: 99) | Hallo, vielen Dank für die schnelle Anpassung. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-22 19:05:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170810096 (Comments: 1) | jacktz1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The landuse residential + residential=suburban would be better just as landuse=residential. A suburban is usually a much larger area. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170810096 |
| 170809846 (Comments: 1) | jacktz1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | It would help adding the type of business is located inside of the building such as amenity=casino. Also, it Casino the actual name of the business? Seems rather generic. --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-08-22 18:59:27 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170809912 (Comments: 1) | Thezkial (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809912 commented 2025-08-22 18:56:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170809398 (Comments: 1) | Thezkial (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809398 commented 2025-08-22 18:56:23 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170810323 (Comments: 1) | Thezkial (Discussed changesets: 3) | It looks more like a highway=service instead of a living street, which is very unusual in the US. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170810323 ... commented 2025-08-22 18:56:16 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170809196 (Comments: 1) | mparasa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for adding a name. Can you also add a tag to describe what kind of business The Heights Learning Center does? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809196 commented 2025-08-22 18:52:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170809587 (Comments: 1) | mparasa (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: Instead of adding a building inside of an existing building, just add a node for the business. Can you fix this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809587 commented 2025-08-22 18:51:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170696838 (Comments: 6) | mod22 (Discussed changesets: 6) | boundary=historic didn't affect the Nominatim addresses, and your change-set was labelled "Remove place=county from historic counties in Northern Ireland, improving Nominatim results". I just question your logic/reasoning of removing ... commented 2025-08-22 18:49:53 UTC by MCDA ♦113 |
| 170808344 (Comments: 1) | hmerritt (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: when multiple business occupy a building, just add a node for each business. Can you restore the building to its original shape and add nodes for the business? --- Published using OSMCha: https://os... commented 2025-08-22 18:47:30 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
 | 170801784 (Comments: 2) | topodelapradera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, y gracias por la aclaración. commented 2025-08-22 18:44:25 UTC by topodelapradera ♦1 |
| 170808029 (Comments: 1) | Samson Kidane (Discussed changesets: 1) | If the church is the only occupant of a building, just tag the building outline. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170808029 commented 2025-08-22 18:44:20 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170805584 (Comments: 1) | sirwillphil (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170805584 commented 2025-08-22 18:38:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170780175 (Comments: 3) | VáclavS (Discussed changesets: 19) | route_marker mapy.cz nezobrazujú. Ale zobrazuje ho napríklad freemap.sk https://www.freemap.sk/#map=19/48.924899/20.542049&layers=X&osm-node=10180137408 commented 2025-08-22 18:35:12 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170802270 (Comments: 1) | Pepper Cross (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170802270 commented 2025-08-22 18:34:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170296177 (Comments: 4) | bhmaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Das könnte man jetzt divers diskutieren, ob der Betreiber derjenige ist, der das Ganze verantwortet - oder der, der die praktische Umsetzung durchführt. (Mir ist das tatsächlich egal und brauche den Operator nicht wirklich.) Der zwe... commented 2025-08-22 18:33:53 UTC by pyram ♦506 |
| 170800098 (Comments: 1) | Rome Zucati (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170800098 commented 2025-08-22 18:33:52 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170779699 (Comments: 3) | VáclavS (Discussed changesets: 19) | Vďaka :) commented 2025-08-22 18:33:30 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170841750 (Comments: 3) | IT Systems Consulting Inc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170847237 (illegal source). commented 2025-08-22 18:31:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170825212 (Comments: 4) | MMNTL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Duidelijk. Dank Eggie! commented 2025-08-22 18:30:42 UTC by MMNTL ♦2 |
 | 170793002 (Comments: 1) | YesJaTakDaSiOui (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте, уточните пожалуйста, это "5-я поляна" или 6? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423942224 commented 2025-08-22 18:22:36 UTC by Grass-snake ♦236 |
| 170770354 (Comments: 2) | michieldevries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Eggie, met de studie jaren geleden kennis gemaakt met OpenStreetMap en raakte weer geïnteresseerd. Deze straat heeft inderdaad geen straatlantaarns. Groet, MIchiel commented 2025-08-22 18:20:49 UTC by michieldevries ♦1 |
 | 170791792 (Comments: 3) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola James. Siento de verdad que nos digas esto. No es para nada la idea de que dejes de mapear si de verdad te interesa. Estamos para ayudarte y pasa con todos que necesitan asistencia al principio. TODOS. Pasa también que ha... commented 2025-08-22 18:18:15 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170641389 (Comments: 1) | Javnik (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170791319 Tak podrzucam jeśli by Ci umknęło, bo dosłownie kilka dni temu zmieniałeś. commented 2025-08-22 18:18:10 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,107 |
| 170843469 (Comments: 1) | abysonta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. With access on foot, cycle, horse and motor vehicle being allowed, it cannot be that access is by permission. With the rest of Brewer Way being residential I would assume this short section would also be residenti... commented 2025-08-22 17:57:19 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,894 |
| 169524343 (Comments: 3) | Bamamba85 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks Bamamba, but you're doing it again. See https://www.osm.org/way/1423871476 for another example. commented 2025-08-22 17:44:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170796739 (Comments: 1) | jschutz (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423958947 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines sh... commented 2025-08-22 17:40:39 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170350622 (Comments: 1) | Сергаван (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2025-08-22 17:35:44 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,033 |
| 170753934 (Comments: 1) | blot27 (Discussed changesets: 3) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13015737063 When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines s... commented 2025-08-22 17:35:43 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170844171 (Comments: 1) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 1) | sidewalk:*=no is implied on motorway's and motorway_link's. commented 2025-08-22 17:32:02 UTC by Udarian ♦444 |
 | 170768436 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 861) | I completely missed that, but fixed it now. You can always search for things like this using overpass: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ane and from there load it to your editor of choice. commented 2025-08-22 17:27:58 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 147750453 (Comments: 1) | ti_rey_531 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo ti_rey, Du hast hier am Landecker diverse Wege nach DGM1 geändert, ohne auch mal einen Blick auf das absurde Tagging zu werfen, das vom User Biosphärenreservat Rhön stammt, wie bereits an anderer Stelle festgestellt. |
| 170833281 (Comments: 2) | webmaster Voorthuizen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Feedback Beter geen name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven \tToeristisch Informatie Punt (pipowagen) Denk dat Pipowagen evt onder description= kan. Wanneer je adresnodes aanpast heb je kans dat één adres uit de data is verdwen... commented 2025-08-22 16:42:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170135189 (Comments: 2) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Potatoleum, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2025-08-22 16:41:45 UTC by Kaduna ♦22 |
 | 170837089 (Comments: 1) | Dago2319 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, With respect, I think that this edit is wrong. Traffic lights only apply when pedestrians cross the road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3136263647) and the tram tracks (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4943887040). But on... commented 2025-08-22 16:41:28 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,525 |
| 170841928 (Comments: 1) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | *chodziło o foot=yes commented 2025-08-22 16:41:28 UTC by driedfish ♦3 |
 | 170797438 (Comments: 1) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 12) | Trek ini terlalu banyak vertices, harap gunakan simplify tool. commented 2025-08-22 16:40:37 UTC by FajrAl ♦97 |
 | 170838994 (Comments: 5) | Wendi F (Discussed changesets: 28) | I just moved here and it looks like these roads haven't been updated in years, so you may see more changes as I explore since there's been a lot of development/new houses/neighbourhoods commented 2025-08-22 16:34:19 UTC by Wendi F ♦1 |
 | 170488762 (Comments: 1) | Yari6889 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ottimo, grazie mille! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170488762 commented 2025-08-22 16:33:29 UTC by Mannivu ♦227 |
| 170611388 (Comments: 2) | Marco Filipazzi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ho sistemato anche il parcheggio perché era doppio rispetto all'area già indicata in precedenza --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170611388 commented 2025-08-22 16:33:12 UTC by Mannivu ♦227 |
| 170615967 (Comments: 1) | Beretz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ottimo, grazie mille! Come mappatura preliminare è più che ottima! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170615967 commented 2025-08-22 16:30:41 UTC by Mannivu ♦227 |
| 170692076 (Comments: 1) | LeoK_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Grazie, in effetti dalle immagini satellitari non compare --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170692076 commented 2025-08-22 16:29:46 UTC by Mannivu ♦227 |
| 170841010 (Comments: 1) | MattHodge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-22 16:29:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170692588 (Comments: 1) | LeoK_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Grazie per la modifica! Ho notato che nella trasposizione qualche tag è andato perso o è stato modificato (come per esempio access che da yes è diventato unknown). Li ho ripristinati. --- ... commented 2025-08-22 16:29:20 UTC by Mannivu ♦227 |
| 170749983 (Comments: 1) | TommyEnglish (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-22 16:13:49 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦119 |
| 170831477 (Comments: 4) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Prima... Veel mapplezier. eggie commented 2025-08-22 16:08:10 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170838570 (Comments: 1) | DullKnifeInDrawer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Dull.... Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adfesnode. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-22 16:06:05 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170797500 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 50) | are these ranks defined somewhere? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170797500 commented 2025-08-22 16:02:31 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦107 |
| 170833658 (Comments: 1) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Chris.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-22 15:58:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
 | 52074517 (Comments: 1) | Aurimas Fišeras (Discussed changesets: 37) | Should add that it is also a campsite for tents. Searching for that category in Oruxmaps didn't show the place for me. commented 2025-08-22 15:57:19 UTC by Schmuppes ♦4 |
 | 168560661 (Comments: 1) | Erick tamba (Discussed changesets: 256) | Hi Erick, I was just wondering why you had *that* many changes on a few days and had a look at those buildings. That precision is a wee bit too much ;) Nodes are about once real-world centimeter apart and one building ends up having several hundre... commented 2025-08-22 15:55:32 UTC by mbethke ♦411 |
 | 170832734 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 335) | Jeg har lagt mærke til at når du retter på huse i et område, at der er mange huse som ikke bliver rørt ved, men stadig tæller i dit changeset. Jeg er blevet nysgerrig, og vil gerne vide hvad dit workflow er, der k... commented 2025-08-22 15:37:09 UTC by drkt ♦41 |
| 170831688 (Comments: 1) | gerooktemakreel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Weet je ook het uitgebreide nummer? We taggen normaliter op de bestaande adresnodes bij. MVG, Eggie Namen... commented 2025-08-22 15:32:50 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 54369767 (Comments: 2) | TheParadoxMuse (Discussed changesets: 1) | The term "sidewalk" is not really appropriate for the paths across campus. The wiki says: "What is considered a sidewalk Generally any walkway running parallel to the road, which provides an alternative method of travel along the ro... commented 2025-08-22 15:24:04 UTC by aduxas ♦34 |
| 54375020 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 369) | The term "sidewalk" is not really appropriate for the paths across campus. The wiki says: "What is considered a sidewalk Generally any walkway running parallel to the road, which provides an alternative method of travel along the r... commented 2025-08-22 15:21:25 UTC by aduxas ♦34 |
 | 170616222 (Comments: 2) | Balborum (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Lezurex I didn't know that. Thanks for looking out and letting me know :) commented 2025-08-22 15:14:26 UTC by Balborum ♦3 |
| 170617527 (Comments: 2) | Balborum (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Lezurex Fixed it. Sorry about that commented 2025-08-22 15:04:29 UTC by Balborum ♦3 |
| 170793613 (Comments: 3) | Danil Moiseenko (Discussed changesets: 18) | Спасибо. commented 2025-08-22 15:00:46 UTC by mavl ♦76,098 |
| 170792105 (Comments: 2) | Sapphire___ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Recently I drove past it on my bicycle. I originally set out a course on Komoot, but I happened to see a Privatweg sign, prompting me not to enter that road. The road there starts asphalted, but then turns into a landweg that is not... commented 2025-08-22 14:55:42 UTC by Sapphire___ ♦1 |
| 170171382 (Comments: 1) | Malinovsky (Discussed changesets: 11) | `amenity=events_venue` nie oznacza samo w sobie stricte sali bankietowej, musiało zostać nieprecyzyjnie przetłumaczone commented 2025-08-22 14:51:01 UTC by dzamper ♦131 |
| 168238442 (Comments: 1) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 175) | Hoi emvee, Je hebt hier op een aantal plaatsen naast man_made=breakwater ook natural=breakwater toegevoegd aan hetzelfde object. Afgezien van het feit dat natural=breakwater niet in de wiki wordt gedocumenteerd, wat is het nut van een dergelijk... commented 2025-08-22 14:49:12 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170799354 (Comments: 1) | Глеб (Discussed changesets: 53) | Здравствуйте. Если не трудно, подскажите, почему эта территория обозначена стадионом? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367744252/history commented 2025-08-22 14:40:32 UTC by mavl ♦76,098 |
| 170769056 (Comments: 2) | Hopla57 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Vu. Il y a bien eu une radiation visible dans le BODACC : https://www.bodacc.fr/pages/annonces-commerciales-detail/?q.id=id:B202101941686 Cependant, un établissement (le même ?) a été créé à la su... commented 2025-08-22 14:38:56 UTC by Hopla57 ♦47 |
| 170742472 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | I am extremely skeptical that this is actually a landuse=forest area. And even if it were, the operator is in all caps, that needs fixing. Is that a double-space in the operator on Clark Park? --- ... commented 2025-08-22 14:27:00 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 170744206 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | parkview already exists as an amenity feature. please check a little closer before adding a new feature --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170744206 commented 2025-08-22 14:17:17 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 170792595 (Comments: 1) | sirsir (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoe werken belijningen? Er zijn wel haaientanden en een loonstrook waar de twee banen bij elkaar komen. Maar er is een fysieke baan scheiding hier commented 2025-08-22 14:16:42 UTC by sirsir ♦1 |
| 170613026 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 451) | Usunąłem już. commented 2025-08-22 14:13:01 UTC by tsp15 ♦52 |
 | 170115036 (Comments: 1) | MountWutai (Discussed changesets: 8) | mostly reverted with this edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170833960 No need to invent some non-existent canals, to relocate some nodes or no create some unspecified crossings of roads and fences just to resolve some warnings! commented 2025-08-22 14:05:13 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
 | 170816030 (Comments: 1) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Is it really a general store? commented 2025-08-22 14:04:16 UTC by kingkingHK ♦5 |
| 170115027 (Comments: 1) | OgdenRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | partly reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170833960 No need to relocate node to due some stupid validation warnings! commented 2025-08-22 14:03:05 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170007881 (Comments: 1) | MountWutai (Discussed changesets: 8) | properly fixed in this edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170833960 commented 2025-08-22 14:02:27 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 169196641 (Comments: 2) | 1-Byte (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again could you please explain where you sourced all the info (not only the locations which are visible from above but also everything else) you added in this CS? commented 2025-08-22 13:58:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,520 |
| 170759517 (Comments: 1) | ross-map (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi Could you please check this version 1 way which has no tags and correct or remove. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423811576#map=19/42.449322/13.881823 thanks commented 2025-08-22 13:56:34 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,446 |
| X | 170830055 (Comments: 1) | fullsoul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello fullsoul, thank you for contributing to HOT and thus to OSM. There are two things I'd like you to improve in your work: - please do not delete and then redraw objekts that only need moving. The rule here is called &quo... commented 2025-08-22 13:47:10 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,520 |
 | 12117349 (Comments: 1) | jonalta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi jonalta, I noticed you added a ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170188925) in Malaysia. Ferry routes generally start and end at an amenity=ferry_terminal but this route doesn’t appear to connect to a ferry terminal at either... commented 2025-08-22 13:46:56 UTC by aaronq227 ♦11 |
 | 170782761 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 115) | whoops, this changeset wasn't meant to include the crossing stuff. fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/170832999 commented 2025-08-22 13:44:45 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦392 |
| X | 170800157 (Comments: 2) | rbtosm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello rbtosm, what fellow mapper ilias_ possibly wishes to say is: It does look like you forgot to upload your quests before moving to another place to survey using StreetComplete. This created a rather large bbox which then showed up i... commented 2025-08-22 13:38:57 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,520 |
| 170796953 (Comments: 2) | dendreier (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zumindest am Ende des Talweg, vor Haus 28 stand laut Mapillary ein Vz 250 mit Zusatz 1020-30 also vehicle=destination. An der Paradieswiese steht Vz 250 mit 1026-37 also vehicle=forestry. An der Himmelsburger Straße steht am Parkplatz... commented 2025-08-22 13:37:16 UTC by berndw ♦603 |
| 170744593 (Comments: 3) | silversurfer83 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung. Gruss wies1 commented 2025-08-22 13:36:18 UTC by wies1 ♦154 |
| 156275749 (Comments: 2) | jakobend (Discussed changesets: 8) | Moin! Ich habe zwischen Barrien und Syke auch nur Gehweg+"Radverkehr frei" gefunden, frage mich aber, warum Du dann aus highway=footway ein hw=path gemacht hast. Laut wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanla... commented 2025-08-22 13:35:57 UTC by GerdP ♦2,762 |
| 170676257 (Comments: 2) | leobass (Discussed changesets: 13) | его попутно хорошо бы разбить на части, чтобы Бачуринскую улицу не пересекал commented 2025-08-22 13:32:47 UTC by literan ♦6,752 |
| 170809378 (Comments: 1) | Nellhunter (Discussed changesets: 2) | Malaghans Road is nowhere near here, either the location of this node or the address needs to change commented 2025-08-22 13:28:32 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦392 |
| 169895841 (Comments: 2) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 445) | Thanks! commented 2025-08-22 13:21:36 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,410 |
 | 170404194 (Comments: 1) | Tabea Schicktanz (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-08-22 13:18:58 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170784763 (Comments: 1) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 142) | Hi, Bad news: ANNCSU has an incompatible license with OSM called CC-BY 4.0, so you will have to revert the name changes you applied using this resource as base. Same goes for the addresses, to note that the positioning of the addresses is off... commented 2025-08-22 13:12:40 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,446 |
| 170831044 (Comments: 1) | -redacted- (Discussed changesets: 3) | This comment was meant to say "label bridge" commented 2025-08-22 13:06:53 UTC by -redacted- ♦4 |
| 165666881 (Comments: 2) | redfox_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dzień dobry ! I used to live in the area, and I added the tag “shop=cbd” because this place doesn't sell cannabis (if you're referring to the drug, in France, it's currently illegal), but rather products made from canna... commented 2025-08-22 12:55:14 UTC by redfox_ ♦12 |
| 170828742 (Comments: 3) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 commented 2025-08-22 12:54:17 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
 | 166650146 (Comments: 1) | Agazzr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola: cuando el carril bus pertenece a otras vías (es decir, no está segregado físicamente), lo correcto es mapearlo mediante etiquetas en la vía principal (tal y como estaba hasta ahora). He cambiado el mapeado al estado ... commented 2025-08-22 12:50:41 UTC by Santi2222 ♦32 |
| 170763969 (Comments: 3) | nlitvinava_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | seems y'all were correct, and thank you for the prompt fix changeset in 170823353. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2025-08-22 12:49:16 UTC by Udarian ♦444 |
| 170826544 (Comments: 1) | OpenStreetBoy (Discussed changesets: 19) | Moin, du hast hier und auch schon in anderen Changesets das lcn=yes von einigen Wegen gelöscht, ist das dort nicht mehr ausgeschildert? Besten Gruß commented 2025-08-22 12:29:41 UTC by mgerken ♦73 |
| 170766832 (Comments: 2) | milet (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hallo, ich habe nicht gezielt Änderungen von dir Rückgängig gemacht sondern im ganzen Gebiet um Erlangen bearbeitet. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass in der Erlanger-Umgebung viele Löcher im Netz der unclassified-Straßen sind... commented 2025-08-22 12:29:30 UTC by milet ♦91 |
| 159878180 (Comments: 2) | Korgorr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Indeed, it's a ditch and not a stream — it's been corrected. Thanks for pointing it out! commented 2025-08-22 12:28:09 UTC by Korgorr ♦2 |
 | 166056701 (Comments: 7) | sgalaxya71silver (Discussed changesets: 48) | Given that this place has two names, the new and the old, we should use both in separate tags. And it would be better to specify the village area as well. Do you have a photo or PDF file for the village area? commented 2025-08-22 12:27:46 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦422 |
| 170828354 (Comments: 1) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Chris, Je vraagt feedback Lijkt me oke. Dat zie je vaker dat die lokale url weer wijzigen. Ze doen het nu kennelijk op een andere manier. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 12:26:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 98983108 (Comments: 2) | thiofrid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Jan, der Schlangenweg liegt nicht im Staatsforst Trittau, sd. in Privatwald. Aber auch hier gilt das Landeswaldgesetz Schleswig-Holstein (LWaldG SH), das Radfahren auf Singletrails verbietet. Der Schlangenweg ist ein Singletrail, d.h.... commented 2025-08-22 12:16:33 UTC by thiofrid ♦1 |
| 170826431 (Comments: 1) | RZ Vitaal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je hebt de rendering van het gebouw verwijderd. Bedrijven taggen we bij op de adresnodes. Alleen een naam zal niets... commented 2025-08-22 12:16:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 159548715 (Comments: 3) | sgalaxya71silver (Discussed changesets: 48) | Keep going. You can even learn new tutorials from the OSM Wiki. There's always something new. commented 2025-08-22 12:15:40 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦422 |
| 162677542 (Comments: 3) | sgalaxya71silver (Discussed changesets: 48) | Wishing you good health. commented 2025-08-22 12:12:55 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦422 |
| 167172384 (Comments: 1) | OttoR (Discussed changesets: 65) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392089515/history/1 landuse=scree should be natural=scree! marc. commented 2025-08-22 12:06:03 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170122879 (Comments: 10) | Friendly_Ghost (Discussed changesets: 174) | Do you know the automated editing guidelines? You can find them in the wiki commented 2025-08-22 11:49:34 UTC by dieterdreist ♦849 |
| 170821767 (Comments: 1) | Tobsilette (Discussed changesets: 1) | Een heel mooi in kaart gebracht kanaal! commented 2025-08-22 11:44:00 UTC by michastubi ♦3 |
 | 170675078 (Comments: 1) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 28) | A tip on SABA use better/sharper imagery. This aerial is lined out on local grid. Do not use BING. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bes-eiland-saba-map-tag-discussie/134427 I did all the roads and building on the island on this grid. commented 2025-08-22 11:39:16 UTC by Allroads ♦427 |
| 170781834 (Comments: 2) | NTTrailsNTH (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Thanks for your comment - I'm a NT staff member and went out and walked the trail yesterday. I noted that there were signs on the path and also notes in OSM to say that there were closures to the footpath made in 2007. I'll make... commented 2025-08-22 11:37:14 UTC by NTTrailsNTH ♦1 |
 | 170767402 (Comments: 1) | tkotnala_lyft (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi there, I reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170826288 because this area is an exhibition area, think fair grounds. It's main use is as a walking area for the red river ex so it's not a parking lot/sevice roads etc commented 2025-08-22 11:36:51 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦30 |
 | 170794273 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-22 11:21:01 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 170806791 (Comments: 1) | Lucas Leiva de Castro (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-22 11:20:39 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 170406743 (Comments: 4) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-22 11:13:45 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
 | 170698627 (Comments: 1) | Wethma (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Check these issues A: Inaccurate mapping. Follow the rooflines more accurate. D: Connecting Nodes to other features. Do not connect node... commented 2025-08-22 10:58:02 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170823783 (Comments: 1) | Spicetree (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Better use the present addressnode, I merged your info. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-22 10:55:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
 | 170137035 (Comments: 1) | Wethma (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper. Please check the purpose of this project. Focus and map waterways and farmland areas. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-22 10:52:46 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170813154 (Comments: 1) | nwdgrp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You are NOT a church! Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170823946. For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-08-22 10:47:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170823651 (Comments: 1) | Przemyslaw | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-22 10:41:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170822705 (Comments: 1) | Eloitor (Discussed changesets: 1) | hola, disculpa brevetat, et passo ref:cadastre -> ref:ES:catastro si és una altra referència m'ho dius si us plau, salutacions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Lista_de_referencias_nacionales commented 2025-08-22 10:39:27 UTC by aTarom ♦783 |
| 170768417 (Comments: 1) | Drs246 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zdravím, do OSM sa väčšinou dávajú obmedzenia, ktoré budú trvať pol roka a viac, aby si ich stihli prebrať jednotlivé aplikácie. Takto sa môže stať, že si túto tý... commented 2025-08-22 10:35:34 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170819417 (Comments: 1) | Pesh Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Wrong business, no address -> SPAM. Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170823446 commented 2025-08-22 10:34:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170819092 (Comments: 1) | Pesh Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Wrong business, no address -> SPAM. Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170823345 commented 2025-08-22 10:32:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
 | 170823137 (Comments: 1) | Songül Yılmaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Songül Yılmaz Make Up ve Beauty Studio burada hizmet vermektedir. commented 2025-08-22 10:27:05 UTC by Wunjo Aydınlatma ♦6 |
| 169938169 (Comments: 2) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, thanks for the message! I reopened the paths. commented 2025-08-22 10:26:29 UTC by wildmaps ♦48 |
| 170744031 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 102) | The complete absence of blue signs. It is illegal to cycle on pavements in the UK - so the onus is very much on those who claim that cycling is allowed to provide evidence. You cannot simply assume that cycling is allowed because it intersects... commented 2025-08-22 10:13:41 UTC by Pete Owens ♦59 |
| 170377434 (Comments: 2) | kapazao_import (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hola! Dius que afegeixes el nom abreviat al short_name però no ho fsa. Crec que es perd informació. Els CAPs són amenity=clinic però amenity=clinic no té pq ser un cap. Jo revertiria commented 2025-08-22 10:13:04 UTC by jmaspons ♦64 |
| 8279267 (Comments: 1) | martin0reg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Café ist leider schon seit Jahren geschlossen commented 2025-08-22 10:05:48 UTC by Tom-64 ♦1 |
| 170820856 (Comments: 2) | max_berg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Maar als je er gewoon kunt parkeren na betalen is het uiteraard niet access=private commented 2025-08-22 09:57:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170821204 (Comments: 1) | tomciokr (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-22 09:51:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170713614 (Comments: 1) | Pascal1909 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi Pascal, kann man eigentlich beim Kreisverkehr von der nördlichen Gehsteigseite über die Gerhard-Kindlerstraße auf die südliche? Falls das geht, würde es das Fußgängerrouting verbessern, wenn man dort noch Gehwe... commented 2025-08-22 09:50:55 UTC by Metzor ♦379 |
| 170768572 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 102) | UK traffic law. It is illegal to cycle on pavement unless explicitly signed as shared use. (these are the blue circular signs with a white cycle and pedestrian) There are no such signs on this pavement. Nor is there any sign of it having been p... commented 2025-08-22 09:48:15 UTC by Pete Owens ♦59 |
| 170818289 (Comments: 4) | MMNTL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het zal strak na updates wel routeren voor wandelaar, want je hebt foot=yes toegevoegd. Wellicht beter foot=permissive van maken. access=no routeert uiteraard niet. Maaarrrrrrrr... Het noordelijke hek zit alleen vast op de afrastering. Er ... commented 2025-08-22 09:47:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170603497 (Comments: 3) | pmichaelis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ah, verstehe. Von den gpx-Tracks her passt DOP20 (und Mapbox) eigentlich immer ganz gut. Leider gibt es in Metzingen keinen ordentlichen Vermesspunkt. In Reutlingen passt es aber ziemlich gut: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5791582325 (Dort... commented 2025-08-22 09:43:05 UTC by Metzor ♦379 |
| 170820220 (Comments: 2) | max_berg (Discussed changesets: 3) | De BAG import uit 2024 heb ik teuggezet. Die kun je evt als building:part= aanpassen. Dan rendert het niet, maar gaan de BAGdata niet verloren. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 09:41:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170820483 (Comments: 1) | tomciokr (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-22 09:41:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170820107 (Comments: 1) | tomciokr (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-22 09:41:03 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170820004 (Comments: 1) | tomciokr (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-22 09:40:56 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170806546 (Comments: 1) | arnalielsewhere (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. When mapping waterways, please start at the source direction to the collector (river, lake, other stream) So the flow direction is correct. To change the flow direction: In Ideditor: right click on ... commented 2025-08-22 09:40:02 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
 | 170817382 (Comments: 1) | Janki Multidots (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Janki, I reverted this changeset as adding a relation to the street for a sales office is an incorrect method. Instead, you should add a new point or node at the sales office building or draw the outline of that building and add your tags to that.... commented 2025-08-22 09:29:50 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170820088 (Comments: 1) | Qrror (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nuorodą i Kultūros vertybių registrų svetainę: https://kvr.kpd.lt/#/static-heritage-detail/287bc15a-afc8-470f-8685-eff418b8c2ea/true commented 2025-08-22 09:27:46 UTC by Qrror ♦1 |
 | 165001452 (Comments: 1) | Bálint (Discussed changesets: 49) | A demolished:railway címke együtt nincs használva. A disused:railway=rail és railway=abandoned egymásnak ellentmondásos. commented 2025-08-22 09:27:43 UTC by balint36 ♦209 |
| 170524542 (Comments: 2) | Xre90 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Moin, danke für den konstruktiven Kommentar, das Tool kannte ich noch nicht, ich bin dabei die Wege auszuessern. Beste Grüße commented 2025-08-22 09:17:23 UTC by Xre90 ♦11 |
| 168375818 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | This edit was me readding a relation, more specificly a Heidelberg - Flinders Street relation. commented 2025-08-22 09:09:55 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦18 |
| 168375964 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | This edit was when I removed the remaining incorrect relations. commented 2025-08-22 09:08:47 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦18 |
 | 170682320 (Comments: 6) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 97) | Bom dia, Não é só em Portugal, mas sim em todo o lado. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route commented 2025-08-22 09:07:55 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦95 |
| 170817590 (Comments: 2) | ElizaGoGoes!! (Discussed changesets: 1) | Escape Room Egmond staat al op locatie op de kaart. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 09:07:08 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 168375908 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Fixing relations. commented 2025-08-22 09:07:08 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦18 |
| 170753588 (Comments: 3) | Milroy1812 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Following the comment from 25or6to4, I, buy_osmand, hereby fulfills the initial intention. Thank you Milroy1812, good mapper of the state of Texas, for your current and future works. 😳👍 Good, --- #RE... commented 2025-08-22 09:02:01 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 165618748 (Comments: 2) | Mike Gasteiger (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170818604 commented 2025-08-22 09:00:29 UTC by fs_LT ♦100 |
| 170680834 (Comments: 1) | bracl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you check the Wiki for the proper names of these bicycle charging sockets? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:* commented 2025-08-22 08:59:27 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 170481238 (Comments: 2) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 102) | Making corrections is one thing, but simply deleting another mappers tags within a few hours of those changes based on what appears to be a thinly disguised personal animosity is vandalism. Yes, of course I am aware that the speed limit was 2... commented 2025-08-22 08:59:21 UTC by Pete Owens ♦59 |
| 170552046 (Comments: 2) | Timo Herker (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke, hab ich nicht richtig gelesen! Ist geändert. commented 2025-08-22 08:52:09 UTC by Timo Herker ♦3 |
| 167522495 (Comments: 3) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi, I have receved no further feedback across any other worldwide changesets related to this project. It will be resumed. Please direct any further feedback to the fourm page,https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-partially-automated-edit-... commented 2025-08-22 08:49:16 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦36 |
| 170816367 (Comments: 1) | Cicuta33 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Cicuta.. Het is nu wel dubbel, want het adres staat al op het terrein. Geen probleem overigens. Ik heb de spatie uit de postcode gehaald. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-22 08:31:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 167411232 (Comments: 5) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 10) | Get them all via Overpass: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2aln commented 2025-08-22 08:31:42 UTC by b-holdet ♦325 |
| 170487720 (Comments: 1) | chippyyyyy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Thanks for mapping. Afte correcting the offset (lined the streets to their footprints) Many higher places are not correct placed on their footprints. Check this footage (examples are bigger, but in fact the same) how highrise build... commented 2025-08-22 08:31:25 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 154820433 (Comments: 3) | sudface (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ok , I'll change it back.. commented 2025-08-22 08:30:54 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,670 |
| 170813657 (Comments: 1) | nanzop (Discussed changesets: 31) | jak zwykle robi błędy i nie naprawia po sobie commented 2025-08-22 08:30:45 UTC by Yog Sot ♦267 |
| 170378371 (Comments: 4) | unique_identifier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hab die nodes nach dem neuen Schema getagged (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170817134) und meine presets geändert commented 2025-08-22 08:30:11 UTC by unique_identifier ♦4 |
| 170816170 (Comments: 1) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Are you sure it's still under construction, when a note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2327347) says it started almost 5 years ago? Aerial imagery doesn't seem to show construction, though it's not very clear. commented 2025-08-22 08:25:23 UTC by kingkingHK ♦5 |
| 170767065 (Comments: 2) | EryrEryri (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you Phil. That is very useful. commented 2025-08-22 08:20:13 UTC by EryrEryri ♦2 |
| 170801887 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Check this webpage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423988086/history#map=19/31.740194/130.709591 You mapped 1 large building with 2 small ones on the left side. These 2 mappings are the sidewall of the same building. Not to be m... commented 2025-08-22 08:16:28 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 169006094 (Comments: 4) | Anne Wittrick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Ivan, I have moved the monumental plaque to the correct side of the road. Thanks for you help. commented 2025-08-22 08:13:35 UTC by Anne Wittrick ♦1 |
| 169381481 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 41) | Grazie per la spiegazione e per aver ripristinato! commented 2025-08-22 08:09:07 UTC by f_gonella ♦31 |
| 170488091 (Comments: 3) | Vincent @ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Les relations qui matérialisent les itinéraires dans OSM sont composées d'une liste ordonnée de ways. Lorsqu'on fait des modifications, les éditeurs ont tendance à mettre les ways en désordre... commented 2025-08-22 08:01:03 UTC by StC ♦310 |
| 170801132 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You mapped here, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423983724/history#map=19/31.743243/130.695452 7 buildings, despite it is 1 building with 2 roof parts, and a round storage tanks The lowest objects are car pa... commented 2025-08-22 07:55:42 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170764876 (Comments: 1) | ujinevich (Discussed changesets: 31) | I, buy_osmand, do hereby invite Milroy1812, publicly identified to be actively mapping the state of Texas, to exact judgement on this edit. Milroy1812, good mapper, what is the judgement of this edit please? 😳⁉ --- ... commented 2025-08-22 07:53:21 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170798809 (Comments: 1) | PLiwer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, witaj w OSM! Fajnie, że dodałeś zidentyfikowany - najpewniej naocznie - CPR. Jako, że zauważyłem tę zmianę, postanowiłem dać kilka uwag: 1. Dodawaj źródło zmian - na ten przykład mogła by to być "wizjalokalna&quo... commented 2025-08-22 07:46:52 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦199 |
| 170793645 (Comments: 1) | wjfarnell (Discussed changesets: 1) | I, buy_osmand, do hereby verify that way/1423944430 that has been created by wjfarnell's hands ✍ is indeed `landuse=grass` 😳👍 Good, --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-08-22 07:45:16 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
 | 170804594 (Comments: 1) | R2bal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fiction removed. commented 2025-08-22 07:43:36 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,894 |
| 170803363 (Comments: 1) | MigRol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, MigRol. Gracias por los cambios. He hecho algunas pequeñas correcciones, nada importante. En cuanto a la etiqueta a utilizar para una tienda de sonido profesional, dado que no vende instrumentos musicales sino equipo... commented 2025-08-22 07:39:40 UTC by dcapillae ♦371 |
| 169005718 (Comments: 1) | Juliet225 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure=pitch commented 2025-08-22 07:30:25 UTC by 無限の刃 ♦13 |
| 170763690 (Comments: 2) | Paul van der Heijden (Discussed changesets: 8) | Paul Ik heb het aangepast naar bollard=rising Kan regulier verkeer hier wel uit? Aan de kant van de Wilhelminastraat staat een C1 bord. Op wegdeel motor_vehicle:backward=no toegevoegd + moped en mofa yes traffic_sign=NL:C1 ... commented 2025-08-22 07:29:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170766337 (Comments: 2) | Mortisian (Discussed changesets: 5) | Jepp, Habe das jetzt geändert. Erlaubter Zugang ist nun Öffentlich und die Öffnungszeiten sind nun "zu den Schulzeiten". Danke für dein Feedback. :) --- Published using OSMCh... commented 2025-08-22 07:23:33 UTC by Mortisian ♦2 |
 | 170810764 (Comments: 2) | Karttakeisari (Discussed changesets: 2) | No pitää tosiaan. Heittelin vanhat ensin roskikseen, jotta sain tehtyä tiet kuntoon, mutta unohdin tietysti tehdä tämän uusiksi. Korjasin. commented 2025-08-22 07:21:34 UTC by Karttakeisari ♦2 |
| 170813248 (Comments: 1) | Déverine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci pour cette modification, je me suis permis de corriger deux choses : - j'ai enlevé le numéro du bâtiment vu qu'il est maintenant sous forme de point, un numéro ne doit être présent q... commented 2025-08-22 07:17:57 UTC by Syl ♦980 |
| 140975394 (Comments: 2) | fietswim (Discussed changesets: 33) | 21 sept gaat de Pannehoef weer officieel open. Volgens mij zijn er nu al clubjes die terug gekomen zijn. Ik hou dat in de gaten. Bedankt voor de informatie, ik hou dat in de gaten. commented 2025-08-22 07:06:40 UTC by fietswim ♦4 |
| 170082003 (Comments: 3) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Extreme park si moze pisat, co sa mu zachce, ale nie je to oficialny zdroj. Je mozne pouzit tieto zdroje: - realne v terene najst cedulku s nazvom ulice, byva pripevnena na dome/plote na zaciatku a konci ulice, - oficialny zoznam ulic mesta ... commented 2025-08-22 07:02:12 UTC by t_ja ♦209 |
| 134381429 (Comments: 1) | EstherH (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo EstherH, Ik zie dat je hier een poging gedaan hebt om een bussluis toe te voegen. een stukje verder is deze bussluis gemapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/301724182 Zijn hier twee bussluizen of is dit mogelijk een... commented 2025-08-22 06:53:40 UTC by Tjuro ♦229 |
| 170779265 (Comments: 2) | Sir_Veyor (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ich habe es nachbearbeitet. Ich hatte zunächst nur die Geometrie aufgrund meiner GNSS-Messungen verbessert und musst heute früh nochmal genau nachschauen, welcher Weg für wen freigegeben ist commented 2025-08-22 06:51:24 UTC by Sir_Veyor ♦4 |
| 170811798 (Comments: 1) | MKB5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag MK , 'Some little things' zegt niemand iets. Graag concreet commentaar toevoegen bij de je uploads. Belona BV staat al op de kaart. De dubbele vermelding heb ik verwijderd. Alleen een naam doet trouwens niets in OSM. hors... commented 2025-08-22 06:36:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 168486911 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 399) | Merci de votre alerte Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2025-08-22 06:35:23 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦241 |
| 170797607 (Comments: 1) | Gabriel 19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170812160 commented 2025-08-22 06:33:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170729518 (Comments: 4) | Kraichgauner (Discussed changesets: 5) | Rückbau: habe die Änderungen zurückgenommen. Danke für die Hinweise. commented 2025-08-22 06:31:51 UTC by Kraichgauner ♦3 |
| 170810328 (Comments: 1) | Fedde89 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fedde... en dat zou dan ook Eindhoven Gerarduskerk header Eindhoven Gerarduskerk Sint Gerardusplein 25 5644NG Eindhoven moeten zijn en niet Sint Gerarduslaan. Ik heb een herïmportverzoek lopen op het forum. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-22 06:29:47 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
 | 170556631 (Comments: 2) | Ngô Đình Hoàng (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nhờ bạn kiểm tra tính đúng đắn, đầy đủ các thành phần của biển báo: from, via, to nhé. commented 2025-08-22 06:29:45 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170809874 (Comments: 1) | Fedde89 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Fedde, Even een vraag neergelegd bij de BAG importeurs over die adresnodes hier. Dat zou inderdaad Sint Gerardusplein moeten zijn, maar de adresnodes geven allemaal Sint Gerarduslaan aan in OSM. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ba... commented 2025-08-22 06:25:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170793142 (Comments: 1) | Randy 28502 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! Please don't any standard name ("House") to the objekts. commented 2025-08-22 06:25:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170809453 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_Ngaan (Discussed changesets: 14) | 19340229 biển báo này cũng mất thành phần, nhờ bạn kiểm tra lại. Cám ơn bạn. commented 2025-08-22 06:24:23 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170768590 (Comments: 1) | GrabVN_Ngaan (Discussed changesets: 14) | relation 17408302 bị mất thành phần. Có gì bạn kiểm tra lại nhé. Cám ơn bạn. commented 2025-08-22 06:23:16 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
 | 36351492 (Comments: 2) | 随风-125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您的很多交通转向限制疑似有误，如果您仍然不回复我，我会帮您删除掉 commented 2025-08-22 06:21:35 UTC by hahae ♦7 |
| 170793672 (Comments: 1) | emilybemily (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3835204410 (address) more than 100 meters. Please check this! commented 2025-08-22 06:21:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170653985 (Comments: 4) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 106) | Gab es evtl. ein Diskussion dazu? Ich war ein paar Wochem mit dem Rad unterwegs und habe nicht viel ins Forum geschaut. Falls nicht, sollte das wohl erstmal dort erörtert werden. commented 2025-08-22 06:20:08 UTC by GerdP ♦2,762 |
| 170803032 (Comments: 1) | Zeymedya Reklam Ajansı istanbul Reklam Ajanslari Dijital Pazarlama Ajansi Seo Ajansi Sosyal Medya Ajansi 360 Reklam (Discussed changesets: 1) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-22 05:57:58 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
 | 170799109 (Comments: 1) | Infinite Order (Discussed changesets: 4) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-22 05:55:41 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170798869 (Comments: 1) | Infinite Order (Discussed changesets: 4) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-22 05:55:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 167784247 (Comments: 4) | stadt-koeln-umac (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo zusammen, in anderen Städten sind die tags area=yes und highway=footway seeehr oft vorhanden. Ich würde hier auch keine Fußgängerzone draus machen, wenn diese in der Örtlichkeit nicht explizit beschildert ist. commented 2025-08-22 05:26:38 UTC by Rjian42195 ♦3 |
| 170784150 (Comments: 4) | Tijnvdh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nog even gekeken.. In deze changeset heb je het het bedrijf toegevoegd. Dat aanpassen heb je later gedaan. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170782317 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170782317 Daar had je het bes... commented 2025-08-22 05:21:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 169893413 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 861) | @mueschel laut https://tldr.nettime.org/@leitmedium/115068427255737564 hängen jetzt die Schilder. Wir könnten also die Namen jetzt umdrehen. commented 2025-08-22 04:57:40 UTC by tordans ♦417 |
| 168379220 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | What is this? commented 2025-08-22 04:35:51 UTC by McCarte ♦8 |
| 168378016 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Why was the track 'relayed'? commented 2025-08-22 04:35:20 UTC by McCarte ♦8 |
| 168377595 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Why were all these stations re-built? commented 2025-08-22 04:33:52 UTC by McCarte ♦8 |
| 169104848 (Comments: 1) | deanleggo (Discussed changesets: 5) | The public_transport=stop_position tag shouldn't be added to the bus route relation as it will reporting on the OSM Inspector as an Unknown role in a relation. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Adding_bus_stops_to_the_relat... commented 2025-08-22 04:22:03 UTC by shinjiman ♦21 |
 | 170701237 (Comments: 1) | UDA CARO JR (Discussed changesets: 3) | The footprint I flagged enveloes multiple buildigns. Each footprint should represent one building. Use shadows, colours and plots to discriminate between adjacent buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for... commented 2025-08-22 04:19:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170701251 (Comments: 1) | UDA CARO JR (Discussed changesets: 3) | These appear to only be walls. Look at the shadow cast by the feature on the East. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback f... commented 2025-08-22 04:16:09 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170702895 (Comments: 1) | UDA CARO JR (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in imagery but the footprints you mapped could be more accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like dat... commented 2025-08-22 04:13:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170808048 (Comments: 1) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 70) | review request was an accident commented 2025-08-22 04:02:11 UTC by cubbe8 ♦61 |
| 170744217 (Comments: 1) | Katia Melissa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Did you intend to tag this as a house, or was it a mistake? Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here ht... commented 2025-08-22 03:48:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170744384 (Comments: 1) | Katia Melissa (Discussed changesets: 4) | A valid highway that looks accuraetly tagged. The line should follow the centre of the highway, a few more nodes could have been added on the corners to make it more accurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM communi... commented 2025-08-22 03:46:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170744076 (Comments: 1) | Katia Melissa (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think the waestern footprint envelopes two buildings. Each footprint should represent one building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to ge... commented 2025-08-22 03:41:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170744013 (Comments: 2) | Katia Melissa (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think that the southern most footprint is mapped as well as the imagery allows. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170744013 commented 2025-08-22 03:40:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 169304828 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 199) | Fixed tag typo from "refd=" to "ref=" https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170807623 commented 2025-08-22 03:22:49 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,052 |
| 170791536 (Comments: 3) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola, sí. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791536 commented 2025-08-22 03:20:34 UTC by James2813 ♦10 |
| 170762731 (Comments: 3) | Jayden123142 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I expect the housenumber should be a number in the 400’s commented 2025-08-22 02:53:59 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
 | 170260924 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 106) | I, buy_osmand, stand to verify that this is acted to the request of anonymous as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4900580 😳 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2025-08-22 02:21:14 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170806019 (Comments: 1) | pjodhka90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, 20 and 22 Falconer Street building should be drawn as two separate houses commented 2025-08-22 01:43:06 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170752372 (Comments: 1) | Mau_Ns (Discussed changesets: 2) | Some of the footpritns you mapped here are quite accurate, but oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that ... commented 2025-08-22 01:33:54 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170752133 (Comments: 1) | Mau_Ns (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in imagery, but many of the footpritns you mapped here envelope either multiple buildings or entire plots. Each footprint should represent one building. Use shadows and colours and plots to discriminate b... commented 2025-08-22 01:31:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 89137527 (Comments: 2) | F5ZV (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bsr, Tous les cas que tu cites sont des "gués" Non pas des fossés mais des ruisseaux. Courts parce que leurs prolongements ne sont pas visibles de la piste ou du chemin traversés. Ils se raccordent sans doute &... commented 2025-08-22 00:23:26 UTC by F5ZV ♦8 |
| 169756746 (Comments: 3) | Raymond (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hallo stadt-koeln-umac, mal davon abgesehen, dass es nicht die eine Karte gibt, sondern viele verschiedene Karten, die auf OSM-Daten basieren: Mit dem loc_name hat das überhaupt nichts zu tun. Wie auch schon von Raymond vermutet, dürfte es ... commented 2025-08-22 00:11:08 UTC by timmito ♦173 |
| 170791254 (Comments: 1) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Quizás sea redundante nombrar el farmyard y agregar, además, el fundo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791254 commented 2025-08-22 00:08:14 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170798387 (Comments: 1) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola. Le pusiste forest a una casa con árboles. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170798387 commented 2025-08-22 00:04:10 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170772080 (Comments: 1) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 37) | po co? commented 2025-08-21 23:14:03 UTC by puchaczowsky ♦141 |
| 170787935 (Comments: 1) | MihaelIvanjek (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks for spotting that - I should have noticed and fixed it when I updated the bridge signs and restrictions. commented 2025-08-21 23:00:18 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 166545411 (Comments: 2) | Tech Dec (Discussed changesets: 45) | Thanks Mateusz. Not sure how or why I added that, when there was an existing wikidata tag (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5445742) on it already. commented 2025-08-21 22:58:32 UTC by Tech Dec ♦42 |
| 170785724 (Comments: 2) | SikeMo (Discussed changesets: 8) | No problem. Hopefully, I'll finish the rest in the next few days. Look forward to taking my family down there to ride. commented 2025-08-21 22:51:36 UTC by SikeMo ♦7 |
| 169341882 (Comments: 3) | WDC_CKennett (Discussed changesets: 1) | You could have read the documentation from links within the iD editor which you used, to understand the meaning of a tag before deleting or changing it. If you really didn't know what the effect of deleting the highway tag would be, you shouldn&... commented 2025-08-21 22:43:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170062552 (Comments: 3) | Joxit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yes or at least a lot smaller changeset size. Otherwise, if we look at OSM history or use OSMCha to revise edits, your changeset is listed for all the areas in the BBOX. commented 2025-08-21 22:34:22 UTC by PierZen ♦271 |
| 170746893 (Comments: 2) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 111) | Myślałem, że oznaczenie to jako „nieoznakowane" rozwiąże sprawę. commented 2025-08-21 22:32:35 UTC by Adam Haba ♦21 |
| 170746030 (Comments: 1) | sSmits (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag sSmits, highway=cycleway leidt tot een foutmelding. Bovendien ontbreekt het daarvoor benodigde verkeersbord. Ik zet de way terug naar residential, met de juiste access tags. commented 2025-08-21 22:24:02 UTC by Leo Slager ♦3,386 |
| 44531497 (Comments: 1) | schadow1 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello schadow1, I noticed you added this ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460668263) that travels between two small islands, but does not have any ferry terminals. The OSM wiki page for ferries states that "Ferries are a for... commented 2025-08-21 22:23:38 UTC by maps_not_naps ♦4 |
| 170762936 (Comments: 1) | cut19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Since the flock device is usually mounted on a pole, it shouldn't be added to a landuse or sidewalk way. Can you fix these? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170762936 ... commented 2025-08-21 22:19:41 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170801657 (Comments: 1) | clay_c (Discussed changesets: 110) | Bravo, sir! commented 2025-08-21 22:18:46 UTC by stevea ♦309 |
| 170757372 (Comments: 1) | megcheu (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't think that this fits the wiki definition of an informal crossings. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=informal. If you agree, can you correct it? --- Published using OSMCha:... commented 2025-08-21 22:15:50 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170796028 (Comments: 1) | bieszczad (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-08-21 22:14:53 UTC by bartgron ♦214 |
| 170759055 (Comments: 1) | Amartya453 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. This is a unuseful... commented 2025-08-21 22:11:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170757998 (Comments: 1) | Amartya453 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you remove the tags amenity=cafe and cuisine=coffee_shop? You were correct when you first added them. Can you add them back? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170757998 ... commented 2025-08-21 22:10:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170658728 (Comments: 2) | StVeit_Maps (Discussed changesets: 39) | Ok lass es mich erklären: die Grafik auf der Website sollte nur eine beispielhafte darstellung sein und kein plan. Ich komme aus der Gegend und kann dir versichern dass das was du eingetragen hast keinen sinn hat. Un der node ist sinnlos da ja s... commented 2025-08-21 22:00:32 UTC by StVeit_Maps ♦14 |
| 170745623 (Comments: 2) | Felix borges (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170745623 commented 2025-08-21 21:59:40 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170746039 (Comments: 1) | Felix borges (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170746039 commented 2025-08-21 21:59:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170747214 (Comments: 1) | Felix borges (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170747214 commented 2025-08-21 21:59:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170744952 (Comments: 1) | Felix borges (Discussed changesets: 4) | This is a good contribution but a better one would also include a tag to describe the business, such as amenity=cafe --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170744952 commented 2025-08-21 21:57:45 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170743505 (Comments: 1) | Jaz1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: We don't use descriptive names, just tag it properly has you have is sufficient. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170743505 commented 2025-08-21 21:55:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170779664 (Comments: 4) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 153) | Thanks for writing back. About your other questions now. All the objects you added today are still in the database, so they will be available for searches. There are 3 reasons why you won’t see them immediately on the map. (Th... commented 2025-08-21 21:54:51 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,525 |
| 169632694 (Comments: 4) | Fabianbuecheler (Discussed changesets: 49) | Aber wieso wolltest du genau hier die Kirche eintragen? commented 2025-08-21 21:43:19 UTC by Metzor ♦379 |
| 161011290 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 65) | Trying to fix tigerking fixme issues, what does [object object] mean? commented 2025-08-21 21:41:27 UTC by CoryS89 ♦2 |
| 170801467 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 202) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4922015 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:38\tclosed\tok 4922022 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:38\tclosed\tok 4922029 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:38\tclosed\tok 4922010 (iD)\tfel... commented 2025-08-21 21:39:27 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 61105911 (Comments: 1) | cowdog (Discussed changesets: 13) | Great work! This was super helpful!! commented 2025-08-21 21:37:42 UTC by watmildon ♦252 |
| 169505216 (Comments: 2) | benfatih (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your comment. Second time, i will pay more attention to fill the address and use english color names. commented 2025-08-21 21:28:14 UTC by benfatih ♦1 |
| 170800871 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 202) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4922034 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:17\tclosed\tok.. 4922041 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:17\tclosed\tok.. 4922035 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:17\tclosed\tok.. 4922036 (iD... commented 2025-08-21 21:27:35 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170800709 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 202) | Note\tContributor\tTmstmp UTC\tAction\tComment 4922007 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:11\tclosed\tok. 4921994 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:11\treopened\tok. 4922001 (iD)\tfelipeeugenio\t2025-08-21 23:11\tclosed\tok. 4922002 ... commented 2025-08-21 21:27:08 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170797028 (Comments: 2) | easytarget-OSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke; dank U, goed om to weten Mvg, Owen commented 2025-08-21 21:16:01 UTC by easytarget-OSM ♦2 |
| 155826754 (Comments: 1) | Mariusz 2M (Discussed changesets: 44) | coś się zmieniło ws tej drogi? commented 2025-08-21 21:12:30 UTC by theDM ♦117 |
| 170799855 (Comments: 1) | antamauna (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-21 21:11:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170799903 (Comments: 2) | antamauna (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-08-21 21:11:06 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 169791889 (Comments: 5) | Ygramul (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hm, Mapillary ist allerdings auch schon 6 Jahre alt ... ich weiß noch, daß die Note sich eigentlich um die 16 t drehte, die aber schon eingetragen waren, ich da aber noch ein weiteres Schild sah und stattdessen das zusätzlich eingetr... commented 2025-08-21 21:02:18 UTC by Ygramul ♦81 |
| 170662263 (Comments: 3) | Shre_WD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Great---thank you for your response! commented 2025-08-21 21:00:15 UTC by Romwriter ♦198 |
| 150311894 (Comments: 3) | Bogomil Shopov - Бого (Discussed changesets: 4) | Аз съм ползвал landuse=industrial + industrial=scrap_yard за Надин, които се занимават със същата дейност. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:industrial%3Dscrap_yard commented 2025-08-21 20:51:38 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦682 |
| 163503213 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-21 20:46:55 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 169301172 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 41) | In realtà, la segnaletica proveniente da sud indica la SS16 per la direzione Ancona e la variante solo per il centro di SBT. Sinceramente sono combattuto se in questo caso si debba seguire il principio che la variante declassa la strada preced... commented 2025-08-21 20:46:35 UTC by f_gonella ♦31 |
 | 170494999 (Comments: 2) | vslatten (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ja, det var ein godt synleg sti då vi var der forrige veke. commented 2025-08-21 20:42:03 UTC by vslatten ♦2 |
| 162060354 (Comments: 1) | DirkHH69 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin, du hast hier ja dutzende archäologische Grabstätten eingetragen, teilweise sogar mit Kommentar "muss noch verifiziert werden". Wo hast du die Daten her? Für mich sieht das so aus, dass du die Daten nicht vor Ort ... commented 2025-08-21 20:34:45 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦319 |
| 170642783 (Comments: 2) | CartoGlobe (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Merci pour le conseil Bonne journée commented 2025-08-21 20:27:47 UTC by CartoGlobe ♦1 |
| 170798732 (Comments: 1) | Dawid Ja (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-21 20:20:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170797865 (Comments: 1) | easytarget-OSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wanneer iets aanwezig is als een meerpaal kan het gewoon op de kaart. OSM heeft ook een waterkaart. Daar staat zelfs de hele betonning in. https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=12.8&lon=5.02321&lat=52.32809&layers=TFTFFFTFFTFFFFFFFFFFFF<... commented 2025-08-21 20:20:50 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170773225 (Comments: 1) | d1rtyd1sater (Discussed changesets: 4) | этот тег лишний, это значение по умолчанию. подробнее у меня в профиле commented 2025-08-21 20:20:25 UTC by literan ♦6,752 |
| 170290901 (Comments: 4) | PDMMDP (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again. This is a great idea and I would be happy to help! I cannot walk very far just now but hopefully this is just a temporary situation! I will very much be keeping this in mind though. Thank you! commented 2025-08-21 20:20:20 UTC by PDMMDP ♦1 |
| 169656191 (Comments: 6) | GermanTaxi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gern geschehen. Ih habe alle Deine Einträge entsprechend angepasst,: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170798628 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170798293 commented 2025-08-21 20:16:25 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 170797010 (Comments: 1) | GerLogan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je bijdrage lijkt me oke.. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-21 20:09:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 163359174 (Comments: 7) | YuiChan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ja, hatte ich gerade gesehen :) Danke für den Kommentar, sonst hätte ich das wahrscheinlich nie gefunden :D commented 2025-08-21 20:01:22 UTC by YuiChan ♦1 |
| 170784766 (Comments: 3) | max_berg (Discussed changesets: 3) | Okay Top! 👍 commented 2025-08-21 19:59:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170761579 (Comments: 1) | CarlosGeldo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola Carlos, Gracias por seguir mejorando Geldo. Sobre el nombre que has puesta en las pistas de deporte, siento informarte que no son una buena práctica porque son nombres descriptivos. Las demás etiquetas describen muy bien si ... commented 2025-08-21 19:51:50 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,653 |
| 170796987 (Comments: 1) | grzegorz75jan (Discussed changesets: 19) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13087500724 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-08-21 19:51:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170740379 (Comments: 3) | BeJotEl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gar kein Problem! Ich hab es wieder ergänzt :) Gab's einen Kräuterschnaps aufs Haus? commented 2025-08-21 19:49:11 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 166342585 (Comments: 1) | I7564 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zdravim, pristup autom sa znaci motorcar=nieco . Ale myslim, ze uz to mate dobre, motorove vozidla ste dali nie, a dalsi pouzivatel Vam pomohol a dal motorcycle=yes, takze motorky uz mozu. A aka "mapa nenaviguje"? V akom programe to ... commented 2025-08-21 19:44:01 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170777124 (Comments: 3) | Der Troisdorfer (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hallo Der Troisdorfer, wieso benötigen Garagen kein "building:levels", nur weil sie in der Regel immer nur 1 Etage haben ? "building:levels" ist bei Gebäuden nie verkehrt und sollte daher auch nicht gelöscht werd... commented 2025-08-21 19:43:45 UTC by Zrop ♦77 |
| 170683162 (Comments: 2) | DaDapperMapper (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi Muralito, After reviewing the data again, I can see how these are not significant roads and may not be useful additions. I have removed the roads, and will avoid adding private driveways in the future. Thanks! commented 2025-08-21 19:41:54 UTC by DaDapperMapper ♦15 |
| 170482879 (Comments: 4) | Der Troisdorfer (Discussed changesets: 41) | Danke. Ich habe noch ein paar in anderen Änderungssätzen von Dir gefunden, wäre schön wenn Du Dir die auch nochmal anschaust, siehe https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ajh Danke. Gruß Zrop commented 2025-08-21 19:41:25 UTC by Zrop ♦77 |
| 159479019 (Comments: 1) | hwierzbicki (Discussed changesets: 18) | You connected a dirt road to a highway and didn't set any access restriction so routers are sending traffic along it to get on and off the highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336975369/history commented 2025-08-21 19:38:47 UTC by blackboxlogic ♦459 |
| 170766441 (Comments: 1) | JennyLIUU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and thanks for improving OSM! Just a small thing for the next time. No need to create a separate building for restaurant. You can just create a point and label it as restaurant. commented 2025-08-21 19:36:17 UTC by Mashin ♦566 |
| 167551374 (Comments: 3) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 27) | Gracias por contestar. Eliminadas. Un saludo. commented 2025-08-21 19:36:11 UTC by MarinoBM ♦99 |
 | 170797015 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Pertsev (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D1%8F%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B8_(%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%91%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C) commented 2025-08-21 19:24:00 UTC by Andrew Pertsev ♦1 |
| 170781584 (Comments: 1) | SimonBuchberger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, am Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13086976847 Die Farbe wird immer englisch angegeben, also „red“ statt „rot“. Unklare Daten werden nicht mit „?“ o. ä. angegeben, sondern im Zweife... commented 2025-08-21 19:16:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170777235 (Comments: 1) | SimonBuchberger (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, ich habe eine Anmerkung zu deinen Anpassungen. Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das l&o... commented 2025-08-21 19:12:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170779100 (Comments: 5) | easytarget-OSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke... veel plezier met mappen! Gr eggie commented 2025-08-21 19:07:14 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170796271 (Comments: 1) | Rp19 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Also removed the closed Bank of Scotland commented 2025-08-21 19:05:55 UTC by Rp19 ♦7 |
| 170565102 (Comments: 2) | jodd (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hallo! Da ist bei meinem Entfernen der Lifecycle-Präfixe ja ein bisschen was durcheinander geraten. Ist korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2025-08-21 19:04:46 UTC by jodd ♦121 |
| 170791185 (Comments: 3) | TommyEnglish (Discussed changesets: 3) | It duplicate some of my add commented 2025-08-21 18:56:31 UTC by TommyEnglish ♦2 |
| 170780534 (Comments: 1) | JDammer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das sieht gut aus – keine Anmerkungen. Bei Fragen bitte melden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-21 18:49:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170757284 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ein anderer Mapper hat deine Anpassungen bereits überarbeitet, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170760814 Bei Fragen bitte melden. Viele Grü&... commented 2025-08-21 18:48:26 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170795565 (Comments: 1) | Martin Ortuta (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, vďaka za upozornenie. Budem si na to dávať pozor. commented 2025-08-21 18:46:07 UTC by Martin Ortuta ♦1 |
| 79159271 (Comments: 1) | 55131er (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, was meintest du denn mit 64A68 ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240710478 Beide Hausnummern am gleichen Gebäude ? Dann sollten das zwei Knoten sein für die beiden Adressen Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-21 18:45:50 UTC by limes11 ♦912 |
| 170686388 (Comments: 7) | delineatorix (Discussed changesets: 19) | angepasst mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170795439 commented 2025-08-21 18:44:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170659597 (Comments: 2) | rimeraz (Discussed changesets: 7) | angepasst mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170795439 commented 2025-08-21 18:44:18 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170795076 (Comments: 1) | NittyGrittyInTheCity (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: the source used was MGP Pro 2025.07.23 commented 2025-08-21 18:35:48 UTC by NittyGrittyInTheCity ♦13 |
| 170676426 (Comments: 2) | Saranya Prasad (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for valuable feedback. We referred to OSM Bing Streetside imagery from 2022, and based on that, we assigned the lowered curb. commented 2025-08-21 18:33:36 UTC by Saranya Prasad ♦1 |
| 170775385 (Comments: 1) | CRIOSITY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aydınlıkevler mahallesi 2023 ADNK verisine göre bile 24,755 nüfusa sahip. Değişikliğin bir kısmını geri alıyorum. Lütfen etiketlemelere dikkat edin. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170794957 commented 2025-08-21 18:32:23 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦93 |
| 170761424 (Comments: 1) | seopinnacleagency (Discussed changesets: 10) | I deleted the address (it's already on the building), the opening hours (incorrect format) and the description (spam). Please, please learn from your mistakes, so I don't have to waste my time as a volunteer correcting the garbage you�... commented 2025-08-21 18:31:03 UTC by rhhs ♦134 |
| 170725372 (Comments: 2) | KorraSato (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo, Danke schön für den Rat. Ich habe geglaubt, dass man wörtlich wie auf den Stolpersteinen schreiben muss (immer Majuskeln). Herzlich. commented 2025-08-21 18:29:48 UTC by KorraSato ♦7 |
| 170753055 (Comments: 1) | RiyaNandy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! The key building=school only means that the building looks like a school. If you want to indicate a theatre school, for example, you should add the tag amenity=theatre_school. For details, please refer to the wiki at https://w... commented 2025-08-21 18:11:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 167152758 (Comments: 1) | Thibault M (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Je vais devoir annuler tes changements car tu as fait une double erreur: supprimer un tag important (emergency=moutain_rescue) pour la description de la structure pour le remplacer par un tag inapproprié (amenity=police). Je te... commented 2025-08-21 18:09:48 UTC by gendy54 ♦595 |
| 170691228 (Comments: 1) | valbzh22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je pense que c'est ce tag: fuel:cng=yes Il est utilisé pour le gaz naturel compressé (GNC) comme pour les gaz naturels pour véhicules (GNV) qui inclut le GNC et le gaz naturel liquéfié (GN... commented 2025-08-21 18:06:46 UTC by KorraSato ♦7 |
| 170792118 (Comments: 1) | sshaffer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1098387519. You changed the value of natural from forest to grass. Were all the trees that can still be seen on the aerial photographs felled? commented 2025-08-21 17:41:14 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170781905 (Comments: 1) | Der Troisdorfer (Discussed changesets: 41) | Test commented 2025-08-21 17:37:20 UTC by berndw ♦603 |
| 169278171 (Comments: 11) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 451) | Tylko z tymi szybami to też nie dodajemy całego terenu kopalni. Tylko jeden punkt w miejscu gdzie był szyb z odpowiednimi tagami. commented 2025-08-21 17:34:43 UTC by olo81 ♦682 |
| 170101171 (Comments: 8) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 451) | Pytam bo na zdjęciach lotniczych nie widać barier. Jeśli można tam swobodnie przejechać i nie ma znaków to private jest błędne. commented 2025-08-21 17:31:46 UTC by olo81 ♦682 |
| 170792108 (Comments: 1) | Donaldson Weston Lake Mary (Discussed changesets: 2) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-21 17:26:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 165354736 (Comments: 1) | Donaldson Weston Lake Mary (Discussed changesets: 2) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-21 17:26:27 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 158988821 (Comments: 4) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 110) | Indeed, that may be ambiguous. It seems there are still few motor_oils tagged in the world :) Thanks for the hint. commented 2025-08-21 17:23:35 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170789398 (Comments: 1) | Cart1082 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Cart1082, meinst du wirklich das Erfassen von "kein Radweg" oder "kein Gehweg" an Zufahrten hat einen Mehrwert? Grüße und weiterhin frohes mappen. Langläufer --- ... commented 2025-08-21 17:15:54 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,341 |
 | 170516027 (Comments: 2) | Friendly_Ghost (Discussed changesets: 174) | I gave up on that concept. Anyway, we have good review tools like better-osm-org, OSMcha and OSM changeset visualiser, so this shouldn't be much of a problem. I also discussed this already with the broader community on the forum and peop... commented 2025-08-21 17:13:36 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦642 |
| 170791319 (Comments: 1) | OutlawBunny (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na ... commented 2025-08-21 17:10:52 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170783221 (Comments: 2) | Crys64 (Discussed changesets: 5) | ok merci, je contrôlerai les éventuels itinéraires à l'avenir commented 2025-08-21 17:05:21 UTC by Crys64 ♦4 |
| 154757410 (Comments: 3) | Martin868 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Encore plus récemment. https://www.lecharlevoisien.com/2025/06/02/cote-a-godin-la-municipalite-change-de-strategie-pour-relancer-le-dossier/ commented 2025-08-21 17:00:12 UTC by Martin868 ♦64 |
| 157780856 (Comments: 5) | alan1209 (Discussed changesets: 30) | danke für den Update. commented 2025-08-21 16:54:09 UTC by chris66 ♦382 |
| 170771894 (Comments: 1) | Sveti Nikola (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-21 16:53:18 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 170758936 (Comments: 1) | hildgyorgy (Discussed changesets: 8) | pitches within a campsite are tourism=camp_pitch, not tourism=caravan_site ! commented 2025-08-21 16:31:41 UTC by hk51 ♦29 |
| 170758914 (Comments: 1) | hildgyorgy (Discussed changesets: 8) | pitches within a campsite are tourism=camp_pitch, not tourism=caravan_site ! commented 2025-08-21 16:31:26 UTC by hk51 ♦29 |
| 170758861 (Comments: 1) | hildgyorgy (Discussed changesets: 8) | pitches within a campsite are tourism=camp_pitch, not tourism=caravan_site ! commented 2025-08-21 16:31:09 UTC by hk51 ♦29 |
| 170758802 (Comments: 1) | hildgyorgy (Discussed changesets: 8) | pitches within a campsite are tourism=camp_pitch, not tourism=caravan_site ! commented 2025-08-21 16:30:53 UTC by hk51 ♦29 |
| 169275320 (Comments: 5) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 451) | Ta w siemoni to zgodnie z: Źródło: Dokument "Prezydium Powiatowej rady Narodowej w Będzinie z dnia 15-II-56r." commented 2025-08-21 16:24:07 UTC by C2oc4 ♦208 |
| 170766588 (Comments: 6) | Alexander da Costa Amaral (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ja, dann alles mit junction=yes belassen. Danke! commented 2025-08-21 16:21:10 UTC by thopf ♦81 |
| 167434387 (Comments: 2) | Stefan@MUC (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für den Hinweis - ja, tatsächlich scheint der besser geeignet, kannte ich noch gar nicht. Ich hab's mit Changeset #170788920 angepasst. commented 2025-08-21 16:19:32 UTC by Stefan@MUC ♦10 |
| 168559263 (Comments: 3) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | Zgadzam się, że pominięcie autostrady na to zasługuje, jednak ta droga to co najwyżej alternatywa Karmelkowej dla Muchoboru. commented 2025-08-21 16:18:45 UTC by pavvv ♦533 |
| 169520750 (Comments: 4) | RuthlessPedestrian (Discussed changesets: 1) | S'all good. :) Like I wrote above, it gets very tricky downtown. Buildings sometimes have multiple entrances, each with their own address, each with their own postal codes. Some buildings the ground and second floor spaces will have their own po... commented 2025-08-21 16:13:13 UTC by hoserab ♦200 |
| 170770595 (Comments: 2) | antamauna (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-21 16:12:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170779869 (Comments: 3) | kamil76w (Discussed changesets: 9) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-08-21 16:12:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 169984646 (Comments: 3) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 151) | Hello ratrun, OK thank you for your quick feedback. We will then wait for the other feedback. Best regards, Patchi. commented 2025-08-21 16:00:54 UTC by Patchi ♦128 |
| 165342973 (Comments: 3) | akino_germany (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ok, die Schilder stehen noch da, das Tagging ist also korrekt. Es dürfen dort keine Busse durchfahren. Ob sie das trotzdem tun weiß ich leider nicht. commented 2025-08-21 15:52:34 UTC by akino_germany ♦17 |
| 167638797 (Comments: 3) | CjMalone (Discussed changesets: 109) | Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. commented 2025-08-21 15:49:42 UTC by PierZen ♦271 |
| 168896503 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas to help local contributors to review. commented 2025-08-21 15:47:32 UTC by PierZen ♦271 |
| 170754678 (Comments: 3) | Tulatu (Discussed changesets: 1) | highway=construction n'est pas considéré comme routable dans la plupart des engins de calcul. Ce n'est pas mon algorithme, mais bien la plupart des algorithmes, comme OSRM qui est un des plus utilisés. access=no ... commented 2025-08-21 15:47:22 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦377 |
| 170773479 (Comments: 13) | FL0815H (Discussed changesets: 6) | Danke auch und sorry für die Umstände! commented 2025-08-21 15:47:17 UTC by FL0815H ♦2 |
| 170739834 (Comments: 2) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hallo Klaus, danke für den Hinweis, jetzt sehe ich es auch. Ist geändert! Ich bitte um Entschuldigung für den Fehler. Gruß Michael commented 2025-08-21 15:40:57 UTC by MichaelFS ♦58 |
| 170785599 (Comments: 1) | CampariSoda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Did we get a ski chalet or was this an attempt at mapping a house? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170785599 commented 2025-08-21 15:38:46 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,150 |
| X | 170772314 (Comments: 3) | M57 (Discussed changesets: 1) | please, smaller changesets, less continents. commented 2025-08-21 15:35:57 UTC by PierZen ♦271 |
| 170739963 (Comments: 2) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 45) | Danke Klaus, habe es revertiert. Gruß Michael commented 2025-08-21 15:32:30 UTC by MichaelFS ♦58 |
| 170785431 (Comments: 3) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 273) | I try. Mike commented 2025-08-21 15:25:53 UTC by HeiligerHein112 ♦11 |
 | 165533055 (Comments: 2) | CK27 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! The tag myosmnote=villageMapping2024 is a wrong tagging in my data. I know that pcode means Myanmar Place Code. Do you know if there is related content about this on the OSM Wiki for Myanmar? commented 2025-08-21 15:24:28 UTC by CK27 ♦1 |
| 139211154 (Comments: 1) | shtm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ist das ein reiner Radweg oder dürfen da auch Fußgänger? Vielleicht kannst Du die Beschilderung ergänzen: Siehe hierzu: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ commented 2025-08-21 15:23:42 UTC by opendcc ♦1,541 |
| 170773360 (Comments: 1) | Michal Sv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Are you sure that the shop is at exactly this place? Maybe it's located at gas station? commented 2025-08-21 15:23:10 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
| 167396908 (Comments: 1) | Bob the Blob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Bob, Feldwege/highway=track mit surface=gravel/Schotter sind nicht tracktype=grade1, höchstens grade2. Grade1 gilt nur für Asphalt, Pflastersteine o. Beton. Schöne Grüße commented 2025-08-21 15:20:29 UTC by wermak ♦117 |
| 170764428 (Comments: 1) | DH_ude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo DH_ude un willkommen bei OSM! Bitte trage keine Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen ein, wenn keine ausgeschildert sind! Für highway=living_street siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living_street VG hsc666 commented 2025-08-21 15:14:46 UTC by hsc666 ♦467 |
| 160041675 (Comments: 3) | HeiligerHein112 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, I didn't check for the other users in that area, sorry! I fixed it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170785431#map=19/50.836480/8.770883 Marc. commented 2025-08-21 15:14:00 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 169952769 (Comments: 1) | yoann_immergis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello yoann_immergis, can you please look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169984646 and comment there? User Patchi has a question to a change you made and where I appeared as last author because I made a fix on your change. thank... commented 2025-08-21 15:11:18 UTC by ratrun ♦243 |
| 170756883 (Comments: 1) | sergej zhiliackov (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted because this settlement already exist on the map with names in all languages. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/540348494 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170785112 commented 2025-08-21 15:05:33 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
| 167620021 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Firma für IT-Dienstleistungen im Bereich Fracht/Spedition. Habe jetzt als Büro gekennzeichnet. Evtl aber doch IT-Dienstleister? commented 2025-08-21 14:55:27 UTC by matze089 ♦28 |
| 115256375 (Comments: 1) | Kynthos33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour, que signifie # AIT 2021 ? c'est un évènement ponctuel ? les grilles ne sont pas définitives ? à plus commented 2025-08-21 14:52:16 UTC by Vinber ♦805 |
| 168326197 (Comments: 3) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Habe es jetzt als Büro eingetragen commented 2025-08-21 14:50:04 UTC by matze089 ♦28 |
| 170777910 (Comments: 2) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour, je ne sais pas si vous avez vu mais ce changeset est actuellement en discussion sur https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/highway-service-access/36807/2 Pierre de Geovelo commented 2025-08-21 14:49:38 UTC by pierre_geovelo ♦14 |
| 167620002 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Vermutlich Geschäftsstelle. s. https://www.ttbl.de/imprint. Habe es jetzt als Büro eingetragen. commented 2025-08-21 14:48:52 UTC by matze089 ♦28 |
| 167620109 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Habe jetzt Fast Food (Crepe) angegeben, obwohl sich das falsch anfühlt. commented 2025-08-21 14:48:15 UTC by matze089 ♦28 |
| 170526874 (Comments: 1) | Rangerdienst Landschaftspark Wiese (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Rangerdienst, die Änderung am Akazienweg ging wohl ein bisschen zu weit (vgl. https://www.gvm-ag.ch/auftrag/zollmessstation-lange-erlen.html ). Ich habe das korrigiert, sodass man vom Eisernen Steg wieder in den Otterbachweg gehen/fahr... commented 2025-08-21 14:47:58 UTC by johsin18 ♦161 |
| 170782815 (Comments: 1) | Janssens Serrurier (Discussed changesets: 1) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Thanks for adding your business on the map. But… please do not use changeset titles for promotional content, this is considered as spam. Also please do not change the geometry of buildings or add fals... commented 2025-08-21 14:44:56 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,525 |
| 168729717 (Comments: 4) | SzPaula (Discussed changesets: 26) | Rendben, bár ez így meglehetősen szubjektív. Nem fogom visszajavítatni, ha valaki módosítja. commented 2025-08-21 14:44:40 UTC by SzPaula ♦12 |
| 135617733 (Comments: 2) | *abq* (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ja, die Beschilderung ist leider nicht ganz eindeutig. Die Bsnnwald verordnungen im Bereich RP Freiburg erlauben in der Regel nur das Betreten markierter Wanderwege. Von daher würde ich am Tagging nix ändern wollen. Was du draus machst f&uu... commented 2025-08-21 14:44:16 UTC by *abq* ♦136 |
| 170440668 (Comments: 2) | Andrijana14 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Rokas_osm Danke für die Hinweise. Du hast recht, in Fribourg ist mir ein Fehler bei den Levels unterlaufen, ich werde das auch nochmals prüfen / anpassen. Die Footway in den Bahnhöfen erfassen wir grundsätzlich... commented 2025-08-21 14:40:58 UTC by Andrijana14 ♦1 |
| 162568391 (Comments: 3) | smarties (Discussed changesets: 85) | Moin, die Ladesäulen sind nun einzeln drin, daher hätte man die refs an die Säulen mappen können. Grüße commented 2025-08-21 14:37:20 UTC by ma-rt-in ♦1,755 |
| 169197961 (Comments: 15) | Crys64 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bon, alors c'est envoyé sous la réf 170783221. Suis preneur de commentaires... commented 2025-08-21 14:34:03 UTC by Crys64 ♦4 |
 | 170566616 (Comments: 4) | CONTAN (Discussed changesets: 1) | A OK O zi bună l‐a fel commented 2025-08-21 14:06:41 UTC by CONTAN ♦1 |
| 168602796 (Comments: 1) | Alexander da Costa Amaral (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bitte kein Zeugs einfach verschieben oder mappen, damits auf der osm.org Karte besser aussieht - Es gibt gefühlt 3.000 Renderer und für jeden müsstest du das anders verschieben :D commented 2025-08-21 14:04:36 UTC by Negreheb ♦277 |
| 170571687 (Comments: 4) | davidvanthorre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Thank you for your edit : I couldn't make it by my app on the phone (CoMaps). commented 2025-08-21 13:50:44 UTC by davidvanthorre ♦1 |
| 170777191 (Comments: 2) | RCSH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Your deletion (which I have now undone) also encompassed a large portion of a tertiary road called "1st Louth Street". Has this street been closed to the public? commented 2025-08-21 13:49:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,454 |
| 170773498 (Comments: 1) | FL0815H (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dieser Changeset wurde revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170778377 commented 2025-08-21 13:47:36 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170772399 (Comments: 3) | Alexander da Costa Amaral (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey, ich möchte dich ins Forum einladen, wo eine Diskussion gestartet wurde https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-von-objekten-der-kritischen-infrastruktur/134484/3 commented 2025-08-21 13:45:46 UTC by Negreheb ♦277 |
| 169056635 (Comments: 1) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tilsvarende som de andre stedene: Nedenfor kommentaren min her vil du se at det står listet opp 3 veier ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605401525 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605401531 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415385710 )... commented 2025-08-21 13:43:49 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 169055808 (Comments: 3) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Stemmer! Det er fortsatt duplikat, de to vegene ser du i lista rett nedenfor min kommentar. Altså https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370552727 (den gamle stien du gjerne kan beholde) og https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415382711 (ny sti som du... commented 2025-08-21 13:37:37 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 170752794 (Comments: 1) | Windowsfan (Discussed changesets: 1) | These appear to be fictional edits, so I'm reverting them. OSM is not a toy. If you want to create fictional maps, you might enjoy UMap: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/. commented 2025-08-21 13:31:08 UTC by willkmis ♦178 |
| 170274635 (Comments: 2) | cocostreet (Discussed changesets: 1) | You are right, seems to be a duplication. But I can not verify it on site. commented 2025-08-21 13:20:19 UTC by Osmwithspace ♦168 |
| 133065329 (Comments: 3) | pfhllnts (Discussed changesets: 18) | Well, it wasn't "shortly", but now it should be fixed. commented 2025-08-21 13:12:51 UTC by pfhllnts ♦17 |
| 170727385 (Comments: 1) | Bluemoon Pizzeria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, Musiałem cofnąć tę edycję, bo niechcący została w niej przeciągnięta droga (zielona linia). Pizzeria (niebieska kropka) też chyba została dodana w nie do końca poprawnym miejscu, bo na środku drogi wewnętrznej (choć fak... commented 2025-08-21 13:00:31 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,774 |
| 170715881 (Comments: 1) | Meyer Menü (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo. Willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe bei der Durchsicht der Änderungen in dieser Region auch Eure Änderung an einigen Gebäudeumrissen bemerkt. Ich habe dazu ein paar Hinweise. In NRW dürfen wir sowohl die Luftbilder des Landes als ... commented 2025-08-21 12:55:02 UTC by Muhmaker ♦126 |
| 170750832 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | Naprawione commented 2025-08-21 12:45:51 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170143414 (Comments: 1) | Nicola Delfino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao👋, come da messaggio privato che ti ho scritto, hai aggiunto una stazione duplicata che era già presente, potresti controllare i messaggi privati e guardare ai suggerimenti che ti ho mandato? Aspetterò ancora un paio di gi... commented 2025-08-21 12:42:31 UTC by AwFi ♦33 |
| 170770873 (Comments: 1) | Little Mountain Dental (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of your buisness (no building near bey). commented 2025-08-21 12:40:50 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170775137 (Comments: 5) | PiMaster314 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wanneer je goed kijkt heb ik dat pad gesplitst in tweeën bij die rondgang De Vergulde Valk. Daar liep het pad over de hoofdrijbaan. commented 2025-08-21 12:30:44 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 169933661 (Comments: 1) | xinot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hyvää työtä kentän uusien virkistysrakennelmien merkitsemisessä! commented 2025-08-21 12:23:59 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦66 |
| 170774786 (Comments: 4) | PiMaster314 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks voor de tip!! Dit is erg handig. MVG commented 2025-08-21 12:23:41 UTC by PiMaster314 ♦3 |
| 170715281 (Comments: 1) | waf_jeremymead (Discussed changesets: 5) | Heya, thanks for these updates, this looks like a nice new route. One question — did you intend to change the speed limit on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42862328 from 20mph to 50? That looks a bit unlikely for a residential road. T... commented 2025-08-21 12:22:14 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 170774821 (Comments: 1) | Fowler High Precision (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welcome to OSM! Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170776751 commented 2025-08-21 12:21:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170774661 (Comments: 1) | Fowler High Precision (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welcome to OSM! Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170776650. commented 2025-08-21 12:19:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 168702211 (Comments: 5) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hallo Pathumthani, Deine Reaktion ist für mich nicht nachvollziehbar. Ich sehe zwei höflich formulierte Nachrichten an dich, die du in meinen Augen ziemlich schroff und mit vielen Ausrufezeichen beantwortest. Immerhin antwortest du. ... commented 2025-08-21 12:15:58 UTC by Metzor ♦379 |
| 170703031 (Comments: 12) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 322) | Ja, fehlendes oder falschen forward/backward ist sehr gerne ein Fehler. Bei anderen muß man auch nach der Fehlerart schauen... Manchmal können Wegesegmente fehlen oder zu viel sein. Letzeres kann auch passieren, wenn highway-Segment... commented 2025-08-21 12:11:28 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,049 |
| 147895479 (Comments: 1) | Karthoo (Discussed changesets: 77) | Auch findet sich eine Mitfahrbank als Car pooling, passt hier ebenfalls https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking besser? Grüße APneunzehn74 commented 2025-08-21 12:10:47 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦149 |
| 170773934 (Comments: 1) | Stegink08 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dag Stegink.. Op een paaltje zetten we geen motor_vehicle = no Dat geeft weer problemen met bv moped en mofa. Auto's worden per default gestopt door een paaltje. Ik heb het aangepast. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%... commented 2025-08-21 12:05:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 151527136 (Comments: 1) | Karthoo (Discussed changesets: 77) | Hallo, diese Car pooling Mitfahrbank in diesem Chargenset ist das vielleicht eine https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking wie im Wiki beschrieben? Grüße APneunzehn74 commented 2025-08-21 12:05:00 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦149 |
| 167151255 (Comments: 1) | bigbug21 (Discussed changesets: 108) | Hallo, diese Mitfahrbank in diesem Chargenset ist das vielleicht eine https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking wie im Wiki beschrieben? Grüße APneunzehn74 commented 2025-08-21 11:56:51 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦149 |
| 162365017 (Comments: 1) | redd (Discussed changesets: 87) | Hallo, ist diese Bank vielleicht eine Mitfahrbank wie hier im Wiki beschrieben? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking Grüße APneunzehn74 commented 2025-08-21 11:52:15 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦149 |
| 170739027 (Comments: 1) | fundamentalist (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день! Спасибо за правки. Хочу отметить, что в велодорожка уже была отмечена: где велосипедные полосы тэгами к пешеходной дорожке: b... commented 2025-08-21 11:49:58 UTC by CometSeeker ♦22 |
| 165174997 (Comments: 1) | apca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. А это так задумано было чтобы тротуар улетел на центр дороги или ошибка какая-то? commented 2025-08-21 11:49:28 UTC by Mikhail Kuzin ♦2 |
| 159857550 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Give way markings aren't crossing markings. commented 2025-08-21 11:36:56 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 164152489 (Comments: 3) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 256) | Dlaczego tu jest natural=wood? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371994543 commented 2025-08-21 11:32:02 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,289 |
| 160143796 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Give way markings (two parallel rows of dashes) aren't crossing markings. commented 2025-08-21 11:19:04 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170465717 (Comments: 2) | Arianit (Discussed changesets: 5) | ah, I didn't know that. thanks! commented 2025-08-21 11:12:44 UTC by Arianit ♦3 |
| 170754908 (Comments: 5) | Pathumthani (Discussed changesets: 74) | Ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du bei unserer gemeinsamen Diskussion im Forum dabei wärst. So können wir gemeinsam herausfinden, was wir denken und fühlen, und uns vielleicht sogar einigen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/... commented 2025-08-21 10:56:33 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170761927 (Comments: 3) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Google earth is not a permitted source due to the license. It is paramount that you ensure the sources you use are allowed. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data? https://w... commented 2025-08-21 10:55:57 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦40 |
| 170586872 (Comments: 1) | MapeoAlmería (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, ya se te ha baneado varias veces por este tipo de ediciones y se te han explicado los motivos. Algunos usuarios estamos intentando corregir la zona, pero insistes en añadir elementos que no existen, rompes lo que ya hemos corregid... commented 2025-08-21 10:51:30 UTC by kapazao ♦918 |
| 170410484 (Comments: 2) | meg_map (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, und danke für den Hinweis. Die Änderung zur Einbahnstraße war keine Absicht und ein Fehler. Werde es korrigieren. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-21 10:37:25 UTC by meg_map ♦10 |
| 170762741 (Comments: 1) | SalvadorBiedma (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, Salvador. Para indicar que se encuentra en la primera planta, use «addr:floor=1» (corregido). Si tiene alguna dirección donde además necesite indicar la letra, puede combinar las etiquetas «addr:str... commented 2025-08-21 10:26:23 UTC by dcapillae ♦371 |
| 170760291 (Comments: 1) | 95927717 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo 95927717, kannst Du mir erklären, warum du aus den nebeneinanderstehenden Einzelgaragen auf dem Parkplatz der Quellentalklinik ein Multipolygon gemacht hast, das wohl ein Gebäude mit mehreren Garagen darstellen soll? Wenn ic... commented 2025-08-21 10:20:10 UTC by klik ♦28 |
| 170769559 (Comments: 1) | antamauna (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-21 10:10:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 169056960 (Comments: 2) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hmm? Jeg finner ikke natural taggen der nå lenger. commented 2025-08-21 10:09:28 UTC by wazabi ♦2 |
| 170392562 (Comments: 1) | Kyle Alden (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (se... commented 2025-08-21 10:08:55 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170695895 (Comments: 2) | seurish (Discussed changesets: 1) | my bad commented 2025-08-21 10:07:24 UTC by seurish ♦1 |
| 170728954 (Comments: 2) | onomatopoeia (Discussed changesets: 2) | I do take this moment to celebrate this❕❕🎉🎊 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170728954 commented 2025-08-21 10:04:30 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170766790 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Teil-Revert , Hydrant wurde 100 Meter verschoben. Bitte besser aufpassen!!! commented 2025-08-21 09:58:13 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 138161512 (Comments: 1) | shurakarpenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | «Картофельный кемпинг» — это реальное название кэмпинга или локальный мем? commented 2025-08-21 09:56:36 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
 | 170755081 (Comments: 1) | ifhdj239149j (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi您好 OpenStreetMap為一即時的系統，一旦送出即在資料庫當中，甚至可能被用OpenStreetMap為資料來源服務取用。如有測試需求請用測試站 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170769107 commented 2025-08-21 09:54:20 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,470 |
 | 160327130 (Comments: 3) | MichaelCollinson (Discussed changesets: 90) | Hi Mike, Thanks for that information, but I have a few remarks for you: By using the landuse=accomodation for this information you are removing other (relevant) information from that area, like you did here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way... commented 2025-08-21 09:53:54 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170676563 (Comments: 6) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dziękuję za pomoc! commented 2025-08-21 09:45:53 UTC by driedfish ♦3 |
| 161983054 (Comments: 8) | VLD292 (Discussed changesets: 7) | I'm actually based in London rather than Manchester, but stayed there last weekend. I noticed some unusual behaviour planning running routes and while using StreetComplete/SCEE and decided to take a closer look. In the last year, there wa... commented 2025-08-21 09:29:49 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 143945011 (Comments: 1) | TripleBee (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! I noticed that, with this changeset, you added exit_to=* on motorway junctions nodes. Beware that exit_to=* is considered deprecated, as it is imprecise, in favor of destination=* tags. Regards. commented 2025-08-21 09:27:50 UTC by Penegal ♦26 |
| 170440799 (Comments: 1) | Tourism_info (Discussed changesets: 1) | which kind of vehicles can be bought/rented here? "scooter" is ambiguous. commented 2025-08-21 09:13:13 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 170726051 (Comments: 1) | Portal Master (Discussed changesets: 1) | What is the source of this edit? There is no change in FHRS. Cheers Phil commented 2025-08-21 09:11:15 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,382 |
| 170663251 (Comments: 4) | EryrEryri (Discussed changesets: 3) | Helo, diolch! Dwi ddim yn credu ein bod yn gallu defnyddio’r map yma gan Gyngor Gwynedd am ei fod yn defnyddio data hawlfreintiedig gan yr Arolwg Ordnans - mae’n rhaid i ddata fod yn gydnaws â thrwydded OpenStreetMap (sef yr ... commented 2025-08-21 09:00:45 UTC by ceirios ♦58 |
| 170763784 (Comments: 1) | JordiG1694 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Jordy, Lijkt me oke. Ik heb wel die G13 tags verwijderd van het lijnelement. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-21 08:53:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 155150413 (Comments: 4) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 83) | pertang bij https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_rental geeft de wiki aan om wel de rental tag te gebruiken. Da's ook niet consequent.. en sorry voor uwe CS te spammen :D commented 2025-08-21 08:53:17 UTC by dentonny ♦123 |
| 170760883 (Comments: 8) | swirdz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik zal er permit van maken... Dan klopt er iets niet in het bordenbestand van de overheid. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-21 08:50:21 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 168882019 (Comments: 2) | Crys64 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dans un premier temps, j'ai tenté l'hypothèse que l'itinéraire reste sur le chemin de Gourzy partout où il existe encore, et sur la piste forestière sinon. Ca reste à vérifier/ajuster. commented 2025-08-21 08:49:56 UTC by StC ♦310 |
| 170763280 (Comments: 1) | Paul van der Heijden (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Paul... Geen versmalling , maar iets anders? Zo te zien is het een barrier=table Die kun je het best op die oversteek zetten. MVG eggie MVG eggie commented 2025-08-21 08:44:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 169520946 (Comments: 1) | Google nature (Discussed changesets: 4) | Olá, Verifico que alterou o valor "ele". Posso questionar sobre qual a fonte usada? Obrigado. commented 2025-08-21 08:42:14 UTC by hvalentim ♦93 |
| 170764224 (Comments: 1) | Teus68 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-21 08:37:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170763317 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 107) | He usado «shop=artificial_turf» para designar el establecimiento donde se vende césped artificial a falta de una etiqueta alternativa mejor establecida. commented 2025-08-21 08:13:08 UTC by dcapillae ♦371 |
| 170739969 (Comments: 1) | BSapp5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! Please note: an address is only complete if addr:housenumber and addr:street are present. commented 2025-08-21 08:11:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170631278 (Comments: 2) | McCio (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi. Why did you revert my edit without even mentioning it to me? commented 2025-08-21 08:07:12 UTC by Friendly_Ghost ♦642 |
| 170762578 (Comments: 1) | DD1GJ (Discussed changesets: 96) | Falscher Kommentar, Richtig: Syntax der Öffungszeiten korrigiert commented 2025-08-21 07:58:24 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 170720319 (Comments: 2) | miche101 (Discussed changesets: 67) | ja das ist ein wenig uneinheitlich ausgeschildert.. Also an jeder Einfahrt ein wenig anders.. müsste man nochmal anschauen.. Wenn ich rechts erinnere mussten die Straßen so gebaut werden wegen Brandschutzvorgaben... sonst wür... commented 2025-08-21 07:57:44 UTC by miche101 ♦144 |
| 170762568 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 369) | wrong comment: merge two nodes on the same psoition commented 2025-08-21 07:56:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170744800 (Comments: 1) | Will Gattiker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I have never actually come across a notation stating that you must meet a certain requirement in order to use a parking space. Nevertheless, I have changed your notation because there cannot be an equal sign in the key. commented 2025-08-21 07:54:14 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170760687 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Rene, danke für Den Engagement, aber Du machst leider zu viele Fehler, die dann in der Qualitätssicherung auffallen. Hier ist es z.B. die Syntax der Öffnungszeiten, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours |
| 170760370 (Comments: 1) | Luyckx_S (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi.. Je kunt zoiets het beste gewoon even hier vragen. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/139 gr eggie commented 2025-08-21 07:27:24 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170749494 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-21 07:27:15 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170709684 (Comments: 2) | Sisay Alemu (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi Kpedido, I was trying to indicate that this vending machine vends multiple items, including snacks, drinks, sweets and e-cigarettes. However, OSM does not accept multiple entries of the same key (e.g., vending = e-cigarettes and vending = food), a... commented 2025-08-21 07:22:03 UTC by Sisay Alemu ♦1 |
| 170759480 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Teilrevert 170759664 170759480 170757284 wg. verschobener Straßen, siehe obige Warnungen.Das nachträgliche korrigieren hatte weitere Fehler verursacht! commented 2025-08-21 07:18:45 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 89139680 (Comments: 1) | F5ZV (Discussed changesets: 10) | même question pour l'intersection de celui-ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835362672 avec les chemins commented 2025-08-21 07:10:36 UTC by frosm ♦1,134 |
| 170748230 (Comments: 1) | ཀᯩ͓͕༐͢ 𑇄᷏̑̑͡⃟⃝ꌓຼ̸̕ 𝝛нiunee 𖡄nkrateia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I can hardly see any buildings in the aerial photos, but rather trees at the locations. commented 2025-08-21 07:10:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170748108 (Comments: 1) | ཀᯩ͓͕༐͢ 𑇄᷏̑̑͡⃟⃝ꌓຼ̸̕ 𝝛нiunee 𖡄nkrateia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I can hardly see any buildings in the aerial photos, but rather trees at the locations. commented 2025-08-21 07:10:16 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170753129 (Comments: 2) | Patryk2710 (Discussed changesets: 102) | "lepsze zdjęcie niż kategoria, zdjęcie się wyświetla na OpenAEDMap" mapy.com mają gdzieś całe Wikimedia bo uparli się na Wikidata a dane Wikidata nie zawsze są dostępne a jeżeli już to nie zawsze mają fotę i to taką s... commented 2025-08-21 07:06:54 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦509 |
| 170721861 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Please don't change `=footway` + `indoor=yes` to `=corridor` . Many applications don't support the latter, and it doesn't solve `=steps` . Most `=corridor` are already double-tagged with `indoor=yes` , meaning it's quite meaningle... commented 2025-08-21 07:06:38 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,581 |
| 164978733 (Comments: 4) | HSL_PALAUTE (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hei, ja kiitos vastauksestasi! Noista kerrostalojen pihateiden läpireitityksistä (niissä tapauksissa, jolloin pihalla todella on "Ei läpikulkua" tai "Yksityisalue" -merkki) oli pitkä keskustelu OSM comunit... commented 2025-08-21 07:04:07 UTC by Tolstoi21 ♦23 |
| 170757846 (Comments: 1) | jacobwhall (Discussed changesets: 32) | https://www.reddit.com/r/rva/comments/27bcaj/richmonds_mcvcapitol_square_underground_tunnel/ commented 2025-08-21 07:04:03 UTC by jacobwhall ♦43 |
| 170751417 (Comments: 1) | Do_not_find (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You move the node https://www.osm.org/node/4226758890 (a bus stop) more 100 meters. Please check the position. If you need help: You are welcome. commented 2025-08-21 06:58:50 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170753250 (Comments: 1) | RiyaNandy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You move the node https://www.osm.org/node/11240409070 (a firehydrant) more than 100 meters. Please check the position! If you need help: You are welcome! commented 2025-08-21 06:55:56 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170757915 (Comments: 1) | Rene Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert Hallo Rene Lübeck, willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz komplett zurückgesetzt, da Du ein großes Chaos verursacht hattest: verschobene Straßen, gelöschte Bushaltestelle, ... Siehe http... commented 2025-08-21 06:52:05 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,314 |
| 170587996 (Comments: 3) | Agaric (Discussed changesets: 16) | I just used the usual reference tool to check the results https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ commented 2025-08-21 06:44:44 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 170713161 (Comments: 4) | RuudBNL (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dan dus geen block maar een barrier=sump_buster osm.wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dsump_buster Een carter-killer (ook gebruikt voor landbouwsluis) Ik heb het aangepast. Groet eggie commented 2025-08-21 06:29:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 164263245 (Comments: 2) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 57) | landuse tree pit + natural shrubbery Is doorgevoerd commented 2025-08-21 06:23:13 UTC by Op'tRad ♦45 |
| 170749424 (Comments: 1) | Chris Hooijer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-21 06:19:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170421256 (Comments: 12) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | @Mateusz - miałem zdublowany jeden cytat w komentarzu a teraz widać zdublowane aż dwa komentarze. Wprawdzie myszka mi świruje (Mouse Double Click) ale te podwójne komentarze pojawiły się raczej dopiero po moim drugim komentarzu. ... commented 2025-08-21 06:18:34 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦509 |
| 170748684 (Comments: 1) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Kijk even hoe ik het heb aangepast. parking_space is altijd één vakje.. De street_side tags zit om alles heen. Daar staan de eigenschappen op als orientation, capacity e.d. commented 2025-08-21 06:18:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170749616 (Comments: 1) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Deze zou je nog kunnen aanpassen zoals ik op het Engels Dorp heb gedaan. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-21 06:15:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170749157 (Comments: 2) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ik heb wat aangepast CTRL-F5 voor het effect. Het zijn nu parkeervakken (parking_space) met daaromheen een amenity=parking parking=street_side. Kijk even hoe het in elkaar zit. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side |
| 170685473 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 861) | Thanks. What tool did you use for that?? commented 2025-08-21 06:10:01 UTC by Agaric ♦16 |
| 170340742 (Comments: 1) | Mapman453 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, The HA PRoW reference isn't the formal name for these footpaths. As far as I'm aware very few footpaths have formal or local names. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-08-21 05:55:11 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,894 |
| 162524826 (Comments: 1) | setokynet (Discussed changesets: 5) | いつも全体的に何の情報を基にして編集されているのかわからないのですが、この編集で追加された、少なくとも4つのスポーツクラブは何故そこに置かれているのかわかりません。 |
| 170549774 (Comments: 2) | CJLIN (Discussed changesets: 3) | 已經由社群成員移除改為正確標示： https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170753852 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170549774 ... commented 2025-08-21 05:13:52 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,470 |
| 170755535 (Comments: 1) | analysisofspatialdata (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you accidentally dragged 8 Stocks Road node from its correct location. commented 2025-08-21 05:12:59 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170727454 (Comments: 3) | m_zahariev (Discussed changesets: 15) | Благодаря commented 2025-08-21 05:11:35 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦682 |
| 127286643 (Comments: 1) | CJLIN (Discussed changesets: 3) | 你好： 好像看起來怪怪的，比對其他地圖以及政府的公告資訊，應該不是公園吧？ 注意OpenStreetMap歡迎基於事實的編輯，但不能假冒事物，甚至為了遊戲關係加假公園 參考：http... commented 2025-08-21 05:09:00 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,470 |
| 170549674 (Comments: 1) | CJLIN (Discussed changesets: 3) | 你好： 好像看起來怪怪的，比對其他地圖以及政府的公告資訊，應該不是公園吧？ 注意OpenStreetMap歡迎基於事實的編輯，但不能假冒事物，甚至為了遊戲關係加假公園 參考：http... commented 2025-08-21 05:08:47 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,470 |
| 170753605 (Comments: 1) | Mahmoudnoreldin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the tree row is not present in satellite image and the footway appears incorrect. commented 2025-08-21 04:33:08 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170753536 (Comments: 1) | fridged006 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the building draw at 7-9 Wadham Parade is actually two separate houses commented 2025-08-21 04:25:55 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 167836355 (Comments: 6) | DKTR99921222 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ano, je to tak, ten nástroj za to nemůže a ty "škody" jsou pouze mým dílem díky tomu, že jsem se s tím nástrojem učil pracovat. A jestli to ještě není jasné, tak... commented 2025-08-21 03:39:16 UTC by DKTR99921222 ♦4 |
| 166756700 (Comments: 2) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 88) | Thanks! Yes that was my mistake, fixed now. commented 2025-08-21 02:59:30 UTC by aharvey ♦1,784 |
| 170547108 (Comments: 2) | mgb95 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catch. That was inadvertent. I'm not entirely sure how to undo it, but I'll try. If it's easy for you to do it, please feel free to do so. commented 2025-08-21 02:30:23 UTC by mgb95 ♦1 |
| 170548581 (Comments: 2) | alanmcd (Discussed changesets: 6) | The intended change applies to only a small parcel of the boundaries commented 2025-08-21 02:29:25 UTC by alanmcd ♦3 |
| 146224514 (Comments: 1) | leandro rajovitzky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Si es algo temporal no es lo mejor borrarla, primero porque igual demora en que los consumidores y las apps que usan los datos les llegue la actualizacion, y segundo porque ahora 18 meses despues sigue sin estar mapeada. Por otro lado se pierde el hi... commented 2025-08-21 02:16:08 UTC by muralito ♦2,047 |
| 170752817 (Comments: 1) | Webblittt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for updating these roads, do you know what road number has been assigned? If it's an A road it should be marked as primary, if it's a B road then secondary. If you know the number it you could add it under ref for all the section... commented 2025-08-21 02:12:12 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦82 |
| 170726379 (Comments: 1) | Support WFD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have you finished the iD tutorial? It's helpful! wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building commented 2025-08-21 02:08:25 UTC by citrula ♦896 |
| 170732061 (Comments: 1) | texlug (Discussed changesets: 2) | looks good to me! commented 2025-08-21 01:52:40 UTC by citrula ♦896 |
| 170732539 (Comments: 1) | texlug (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your contribution. This looks good to me. If you are able to use the gate at Bagdad on a bike you might want to add foot=permissive and bicycle=permissive access tags, as well. commented 2025-08-21 01:50:16 UTC by citrula ♦896 |
| 170644746 (Comments: 1) | RM23 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for adding the new PG County bus routes! Your work looks pretty good so far, but let me know if you need any help. commented 2025-08-21 00:18:25 UTC by andrewth1 ♦8 |
| 170717816 (Comments: 2) | alhambraparcmiami (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have manually reverted you changeset as, after a conversation with others on the OSMUS slack, and not getting anything back from you after multiple hours it seems that this changeset is SEO spam and thus it was undone. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2025-08-21 00:12:40 UTC by Udarian ♦444 |
| X | 170750642 (Comments: 2) | samuelzammit (Discussed changesets: 6) | And 109A instead of N82. commented 2025-08-20 23:42:28 UTC by samuelzammit ♦4 |
| 170701905 (Comments: 2) | JohnIbrahim20 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, is Waverly Orthopaedic Clinic really a hospital, or is there a better tag for this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170701905 commented 2025-08-20 23:42:19 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170704922 (Comments: 1) | Zakariya Mohamed (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. It looks like you ... commented 2025-08-20 23:35:38 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170698398 (Comments: 1) | dpcastrob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you spotted a building in the imagery but the footprint you mapped is not as accutrate as the imagery allows becasue it is oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population e... commented 2025-08-20 23:30:43 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170695759 (Comments: 1) | ATownBike (Discussed changesets: 2) | There appears to be two bike ways for the Tommy Thompson Parkway. User MulhollandWildcatCWU added them. Only one exists. I'd recommend keeping the one with the relation and removing the other. Can you do that or do you need help? ... commented 2025-08-20 23:21:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170695345 (Comments: 1) | ATownBike (Discussed changesets: 2) | ou tagged this as a bicycle road which should only happen if the road is signed. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes Also, the tag kerb extension ios typically a node where the curb extends out. --- |
| 170685411 (Comments: 1) | Fatimah Abanur (Discussed changesets: 3) | If the business occupies the entire building, then just add the business to the building outline, otherwise just add a node, but not both. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2025-08-20 23:13:53 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170686180 (Comments: 1) | Fatimah Abanur (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Please note that most alley's are not named. We only add a name if there is sign. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2025-08-20 23:12:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170685881 (Comments: 1) | Fatimah Abanur (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170685881 commented 2025-08-20 23:11:37 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170749642 (Comments: 2) | Js7h (Discussed changesets: 4) | Nachtrag: Das Verzeichnis zu finden in https://www.verkehr.steiermark.at/cms/ziel/155689159/DE/ folgt jener Version des GIS Steiermark; daher erscheint mir die Version GIS Steiermark bzw. obiger Seite die aktuelle zu sein. commented 2025-08-20 23:04:36 UTC by Js7h ♦3 |
| 170705335 (Comments: 2) | tomi002 (Discussed changesets: 7) | no niby jest tabliczka bliżej cyty oraz w 2024 niby też zaraz na tym właśnie odcinku przy tym hybrydowym przejciu dla pieszych w rowerowym, co zostało ogłoszone jednak nielegalnym ;d commented 2025-08-20 23:00:35 UTC by Yog Sot ♦267 |
| 159623707 (Comments: 2) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi there, I mapped this about a year ago and revisited it recently. I still need to go into this further, as I have yet to do on-the-ground research for this. That said, I have cut up some of the segments to reflect this, so I thought that I had done... commented 2025-08-20 22:53:28 UTC by Ktr101 ♦23 |
| 170608022 (Comments: 3) | Mashin (Discussed changesets: 39) | Alright, thank you for letting me know. These trails are not endorsed, but do exist on various mountain biking websites and such. You are totally correct - I do feel like a cycleway might more refer to urban greenways. Even though I agree these trail... commented 2025-08-20 22:49:51 UTC by Dean Batchelder ♦1 |
| 153897627 (Comments: 1) | Js7h (Discussed changesets: 4) | Relation "Rechberg Straße" wurde mittlerweilse verlegt, allerdings ist die Reihenfolge der Abschnitte nicht korrekt, dazu siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170749485#map=15/47.20461/15.64157 commented 2025-08-20 22:31:57 UTC by Js7h ♦3 |
| 170311383 (Comments: 1) | Just_Miha (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее ... commented 2025-08-20 22:26:48 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,033 |
| 170295751 (Comments: 1) | Kirall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не шалите commented 2025-08-20 22:25:00 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,033 |
| 170743375 (Comments: 2) | Jos Hebing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ik zie al waar het verschil ontstaat, de tag use_sidepath is in de browser niet beschikbaar commented 2025-08-20 22:23:04 UTC by Jos Hebing ♦6 |
| 170743484 (Comments: 4) | Jos Hebing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dat komt omdat paden die op slot staan veel minder duidelijk renderen op de standaardkaart. commented 2025-08-20 22:15:02 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 167506023 (Comments: 3) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | No a tie su oznacene ako sukromne. Tak ked uz to je ako parkovisko, nech to niekoho nelaka ako verejne parkovanie. Ak sa tam naozaj auta dostavaju cez travu, nemusime kreslit cestu. Dakujem commented 2025-08-20 22:06:38 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170746165 (Comments: 3) | Dani CS (Discussed changesets: 11) | La clave «faculty» se usa tanto en nodos como en áreas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:faculty. No necesita «area=yes». commented 2025-08-20 22:05:57 UTC by dcapillae ♦371 |
| 170747153 (Comments: 5) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ik heb charging point veranderd naar charging_station. Dan zal het symbool renderen. Moet wel zeggen dat de wiki steeds weer met wat nieuws komt en de kaartenmakers het denk ik niet bij kunnen houden met de rendering. commented 2025-08-20 21:55:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170746614 (Comments: 1) | Yentel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-20 21:51:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170232337 (Comments: 3) | Mardaterra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ningún problema. Cualquier duda que puedas tener siempre puedes contactar con el grupo de Galicia (https://t.me/osmgalicia), donde estarán encantados de colaborar. Un saludo, Jesús López OpenStreetMap Foun... commented 2025-08-20 21:36:16 UTC by jeslop ♦4,243 |
| 149028741 (Comments: 7) | Alec Coates (Discussed changesets: 6) | Apologies, I wasn't try to accuse you of anything. I just disagree with the assessment, opening a community discussion seems like a sensible move. commented 2025-08-20 21:35:21 UTC by Alec Coates ♦8 |
| 170126977 (Comments: 2) | Tomasz Paprodziad (Discussed changesets: 11) | Byłem i widziałem. Dom Kultury przeniesiony na północny zachód "Zameczek". commented 2025-08-20 21:30:37 UTC by Tomasz Paprodziad ♦8 |
| 166170173 (Comments: 3) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Automaticky importovat z katastra neviem ani ja (plugin do JOSM uz tusim nefunguje). Da sa importovat z inych zdrojov budov, ale tam tiez nie som spokojny s presnostou. Minimalne sa vsak da podlozit ako vrstva a obkreslovat rucne priamo v JOSM... commented 2025-08-20 21:28:57 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170716583 (Comments: 4) | jmaspons (Discussed changesets: 18) | I això em fa pensar en què vol dir "nom en català". "nom" i prou, potser, en general. commented 2025-08-20 21:28:26 UTC by quelgir ♦4 |
| 170665229 (Comments: 3) | sharp gift (Discussed changesets: 5) | Heh, sorry I didn't mean to insinuate anything or be so blunt in my question. I have been using the contact prefix for everything in Bexhill and just wondered if I was acting misguided, thanks. commented 2025-08-20 21:22:03 UTC by Bexhill-OSM ♦97 |
| 170747712 (Comments: 1) | su91 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-20 21:21:33 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170720251 (Comments: 3) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok dzieki za poprawki :) commented 2025-08-20 21:13:26 UTC by David_Serum ♦3 |
| 166685061 (Comments: 8) | EfreetSK (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dobre, dakujem. commented 2025-08-20 21:12:48 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 124725260 (Comments: 3) | priean (Discussed changesets: 6) | Otazka cie miesto servisu zrazu moze byt v dome parkovisko. No treba to tam preverit. commented 2025-08-20 21:05:24 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 149479643 (Comments: 1) | osmoid (Discussed changesets: 30) | Két szezonban volt nem működőnek jelölve az egyébként működő csap. Ez egy jó példája annak, hogy egy márciusban még nem üzemelő csapot miért nem kéne disus... commented 2025-08-20 21:01:53 UTC by BáthoryPéter ♦82 |
| 170746088 (Comments: 1) | Yoelpichula (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. El local no es el número de la dirección. El Local va como addr:unit=. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170746088 commented 2025-08-20 21:00:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 169671528 (Comments: 3) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 110) | Zdravim. Preco by C a D neboli spravne? A kde akoze koncia ked nie su po celej dlzke? Ved to vyzera zamerne tak postavene, ze je to cele jedno velke nastupiste. Elektrickove tak mozu byt dlhe ale autobusove nie? Nerozumiem v com je problem. ... commented 2025-08-20 20:57:43 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 164198543 (Comments: 1) | Loneship (Discussed changesets: 13) | Danke fürs eintragen! Ich hab mal die 5 GW auf 5 MW korrigiert. :) commented 2025-08-20 20:56:22 UTC by GorgorMith ♦12 |
| 170743711 (Comments: 1) | LukaJorjoliani (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted with respect to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17854258 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17854260 : structurally these are parts of a single building connected by a stylobate https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... commented 2025-08-20 20:50:46 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 167405887 (Comments: 9) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nie, na highway=service naozaj netrvam. Len mi to prislo vhodnejsie ked som sa tam pohyboval a videl som ako to tam vyzera. Tu znacku o obytnej zone som si asi ani nevsimol. commented 2025-08-20 20:50:10 UTC by ticho2 ♦18 |
| 65169595 (Comments: 3) | guillemmal (Discussed changesets: 24) | Listo! Gracias! commented 2025-08-20 20:49:15 UTC by muralito ♦2,047 |
| 170624042 (Comments: 3) | Maximvs_7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | In addition, I am now also using a cadastral map (WMS) taken from the Revenue Agency website (https://www.agenziaentrate.gov.it/portale/documents/20143/260417/Manuale+consultazione+cartografia_Documentazione+descrittiva+del+servizio+di+consultazione+... commented 2025-08-20 20:46:02 UTC by Maximvs_7 ♦1 |
| 169668114 (Comments: 3) | priean (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ak chcete tak to urobte, tych dojazdov je vsak dost vela po Bratislave a variantov tras bude dost. Len teda kym relaciu neozivite odstanenim tych prefixov disused: tak je zbytocne ich menit na trasy ktorymi nechodili. commented 2025-08-20 20:45:20 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 169671055 (Comments: 4) | priean (Discussed changesets: 6) | To je ale chyba mapy, asi zatial nevykresluje tuto hodnotu. To neznamena, ze sa ma kvoli mape (a ktorej? napr. OsmAnd ju zobrazoval) ohybat znacka. To je v OSM zakazane. Takze aky je dobry dovod? commented 2025-08-20 20:42:25 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 169578337 (Comments: 4) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 110) | Chapem, zapisal som len route_ref na zastavku, podla toho, ze bola v relacii linky. Ale nemenil som relaciu, ktora teda bola nespravna uz pred tymito zmenami. Dakujem za opravu. commented 2025-08-20 20:41:07 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 131973926 (Comments: 1) | Joao Duailibe (João Duailibe) (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello João Duailibe, I noticed you added this ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137054780), however I don’t see a ferry terminal at the north end of the route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137054782) in aerial ... commented 2025-08-20 20:34:50 UTC by maps_not_naps ♦4 |
| 170712665 (Comments: 1) | Ulyanov24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | неверная правка. Ознакомьтесь с классификацией дорог у меня в профиле. Откачу. commented 2025-08-20 20:30:52 UTC by literan ♦6,752 |
| 170710060 (Comments: 1) | edgard_m (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hvor har du navnet fra? Kilde tak! Jeg kan ikke finde noget om det nogen steder. commented 2025-08-20 20:30:03 UTC by b-holdet ♦325 |
| 137137215 (Comments: 1) | Rafal1984 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4920781 - czym jest ten słupek? jest tam tablica informacyjna? kod qr? numer słupka i tyle? commented 2025-08-20 20:29:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170742265 (Comments: 1) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Formeel is het een path, maar motor_vehicle=no geeft wel problemen met moped en mofa dus mofa en moped=yes toevoegen. Het langsliggende pad is een G12a Gr eggie commented 2025-08-20 20:27:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 105728196 (Comments: 1) | Arikarindokuta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4920778 ? commented 2025-08-20 20:27:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170743030 (Comments: 2) | Jos Hebing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Tagging van fietspaden: G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway commented 2025-08-20 20:23:38 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170727129 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Reverting because of unnecessary modification #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170746155 commented 2025-08-20 20:20:05 UTC by TinPetreković ♦110 |
| 170745183 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Reverting because of unnecessary modification #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170746100 commented 2025-08-20 20:18:26 UTC by TinPetreković ♦110 |
| 169600416 (Comments: 2) | Janderhamster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry for sounding harsh. I know you had the best of intentions. I'm more mad at Google Maps for just (maybe I'm wrong on this) making up names for places. commented 2025-08-20 20:15:24 UTC by ginnyTheCat ♦6 |
| 170295021 (Comments: 4) | KSP MUC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich habe die Wege wiederhergestellt und mit dem Tag access=no versehen. commented 2025-08-20 20:13:51 UTC by CaptainCrunch ♦25 |
 | 170729168 (Comments: 1) | Rene Sato (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-20 20:03:49 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦119 |
 | 170691275 (Comments: 7) | Djack_UA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, thank you. Sorry again. I don't know how to divide a large multipolygon into smaller parts. Therefore, I will not adjust this polygon anymore. commented 2025-08-20 20:00:50 UTC by Djack_UA ♦3 |
| 170739657 (Comments: 5) | aparra09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buena, hablemos por ahí. Saludos commented 2025-08-20 19:59:22 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170738873 (Comments: 3) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Die editor geeft denk ik suggesties.. maar daar hoef je geen gevolg aan te geven. Mapse commented 2025-08-20 19:50:39 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170741242 (Comments: 3) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alle begin is moeilijk en osm kent wel een heel steile leercurve. Iedereen was ooit beginner. Mapse.. eggie commented 2025-08-20 19:47:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170739374 (Comments: 2) | oko2708 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yes thanks! Ik had het inmiddels ook gevonden op de wiki. Als het goed is had ik de wijziging in de volgende edit ook weer ongedaan gemaakt. commented 2025-08-20 19:46:05 UTC by oko2708 ♦3 |
| 170703540 (Comments: 3) | LudovicG (Discussed changesets: 22) | office=yes ne peut être faux. Après effectivement j'avais vu qu'il n'y avait pas consensus. Le plus simple c'est de se connecter au forum avec son identifiant OSM et de demander si on peut converger. Si la discussion ... commented 2025-08-20 19:35:08 UTC by trial ♦894 |
| 170581278 (Comments: 7) | Jos Hebing (Discussed changesets: 7) | Goed inzoomen dan zie je beter wat je doet. Dat onbedoeld verplaatsen komt omdat je iets per abuis geselecteerd hebt. Selecteren doe je met de linkermuisknop...maar schuiven ook. Op het moment dat je de kaart verschuift en die kaart schuift ... commented 2025-08-20 19:34:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 169627550 (Comments: 1) | Hella Fred (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hella Fred, this is another of my change sets that you've deleted. I'd ask that you reverse your deletion so that OSM can reflect the truth on the ground. commented 2025-08-20 19:33:50 UTC by Toby H Ferguson ♦2 |
| 170712329 (Comments: 1) | GermanTaxi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, die Adresse ist bereits www.openstreetmap.org/way/327155083 zugeordnet. Die Adressdublette allein ist schon ein Problem. In OSM wird recht großzügig mit Adressen umgegangen; dennoch gilt grundsätzlich (mit meinen W... commented 2025-08-20 19:32:33 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 169177367 (Comments: 1) | Hella Fred (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hella Fred, I understand your concerns regarding this dataset and hence your deletion. However OSM's 'how we map' clearly states that we map what's on the ground and that we don't perform deletions unless we know somet... commented 2025-08-20 19:32:12 UTC by Toby H Ferguson ♦2 |
| 170703186 (Comments: 3) | LudovicG (Discussed changesets: 22) | j'imagine effectivement qu'il n'y a pas de panneaux de fin de zone de 30 aux débuts, et de début de zone de 30 aux fins, de la partie sans véhicule à moteur :-). Même si on voit de tout ! commented 2025-08-20 19:29:16 UTC by trial ♦894 |
| 169784945 (Comments: 1) | Yffo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I have reverted this changeset as you made the road that runs through Örebro Resecentrum a zigzag by moving the bus stop nodes to the platforms. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170744157 commented 2025-08-20 19:26:51 UTC by _Madfly ♦15 |
| 170713577 (Comments: 1) | dodokamo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen: Wurde das alte Gebäude tatsächlich abgerissen? Wenn nein: dann bitte wiederherstellen. [Sehe ich das richtig, dass du das Gebä... commented 2025-08-20 19:12:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170683346 (Comments: 7) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Na bestudering van OSM documentatie en uitproberen van andere lifecycle schemes, uiteindelijk toch maar gekozen voor disused:highway=track. Waarschijnlijk zal deze weg op den duur toch verdwijnen. Toch vond ik de weergave op de kaart passender met... commented 2025-08-20 19:11:14 UTC by JR_Nl ♦7 |
| 170693749 (Comments: 2) | HaraldH2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo David ich habe die schräge vermutlich ehemalige Bahnlinie gelöscht. Der Radweg verläuft über den Weg commented 2025-08-20 19:08:17 UTC by HaraldH2 ♦1 |
 | 170645867 (Comments: 1) | Sredoje (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sve izmene na administrativnoj granici su Vam obrisane. Granice u Srbiji dolaze iz RGZ-a i vec su unete, a imamo i sistem da se primeti kada se pokvare. Molimo ne menjajte vise administrativne granice. Vidim da se ne javljate ni drugim korisnicima, p... commented 2025-08-20 19:05:41 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦311 |
| 170154678 (Comments: 2) | jeka p (Discussed changesets: 112) | Hi! thanks - I'm glad it works! .... I will definetely need helt with that, but a bit later. I'm still working on my surveys during the trip. And I want to finish them first. commented 2025-08-20 18:55:44 UTC by jeka p ♦222 |
| 164900975 (Comments: 1) | Minion04 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Partially reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170742631): The roof of Fort den Haakweg 34 not simply "gabled". https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279010013 commented 2025-08-20 18:44:27 UTC by RubenKelevra ♦63 |
| 149024569 (Comments: 2) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 95) | Geen idee. Ik zal kijken of hij er nog is nu het pand leeg staat, maar recent was hij er nog wel. commented 2025-08-20 18:42:47 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦660 |
| 169474020 (Comments: 14) | Hobby Mapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ist es so schwer, im wiki access=private zu finden und die Erläuterung dazu zu verstehen? commented 2025-08-20 18:38:14 UTC by Protoxenus ♦318 |
| 87916258 (Comments: 2) | Lachgast (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hoi Marc, Bedankt voor het nakijken! Leuk, zo'n oude koe; tof om te zien hoe de manier van werken is veranderd met de jaren. Dit moet denk ik zijn geweest landuse=grass, ofschoon er dan overlap zou zijn geweest met de oude 3dshapes... commented 2025-08-20 18:37:39 UTC by Lachgast ♦121 |
| 170738790 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hoi.. Je vraagt feedback .. Lijkt me inderdaad zo beter. Je kunt zo'n basketballveldje ook als vlak intekenen. Dat is gebruikelijker. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 18:37:37 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 169900824 (Comments: 4) | NunoCaldeira (Discussed changesets: 22) | hello +1, need to fix all other issue like this 2 nodes : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13045451926 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13045767654 commented 2025-08-20 18:30:41 UTC by didier2020 ♦92 |
| 166837845 (Comments: 1) | Rezasfd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello You have used tags that do not exist in Iran. If you return the wrong tag, you will be reported. commented 2025-08-20 18:26:38 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦422 |
| 170741359 (Comments: 1) | Damian05 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-08-20 18:21:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170597850 (Comments: 2) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 15) | Merhabalar, Sancaktepe Belediyesinin yapmış olduğu proje ile bölgedeki ilgili sokakların tamamına yönelik yayalaştırma çalışması yürütülmektedir. Bu tarz sokaklar için yaya yolu kullanımı doğrudur. ... commented 2025-08-20 18:15:56 UTC by Alikam ♦7 |
 | 166131977 (Comments: 1) | Johnny Carlsen (Discussed changesets: 48) | Landuse=2 What's that supposed to indicate? Best regards Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group commented 2025-08-20 18:07:43 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 140414905 (Comments: 1) | luisrobledomx1 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892131870#map=15/25.34925/-102.78693 landuse=2 ?? What do you mean Best regards Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group commented 2025-08-20 18:06:44 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170196095 (Comments: 5) | DasKartenSchaf (Discussed changesets: 6) | Humph... I guess this requires some knowledge of how the cable cars work and what is needed to make them work again. But I lack it. I would put more attention on whether the condition is marked with a separate tag (whichever) or with a prefix. Wit... commented 2025-08-20 17:47:36 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170090583 (Comments: 2) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Ist korrigiert. Ich habe nochmals untersucht wie das geschehen kann. Mit dem IdEditor kann man leicht einen Punkt verschieben und ein benachbarter Punkt packt den. Ich wollte da im Arvenbüel gar nichts ändern, sondern nur was nachschauen. ... commented 2025-08-20 17:42:15 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦21 |
| 170281292 (Comments: 3) | BXBlack (Discussed changesets: 1) | En zoomant bien avec le calque Vue Satellite de Google Maps, on devine la barrière qui entoure le site de l'écluse des fontinettes. Donc impossible de traverser l'AA en empruntant cette écluse. A voir jusqu'ou les ... commented 2025-08-20 17:38:49 UTC by BXBlack ♦1 |
| 170612668 (Comments: 1) | Bagira19 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Házszám végére nem szükséges a pont. Köszi, Tamás commented 2025-08-20 17:36:50 UTC by vasony ♦513 |
| 167055726 (Comments: 2) | Reitstoen (Discussed changesets: 1) | I used Strava Heatmap to add these paths. And usually I also try to verify by looking at aerial to see if it's visible there as well. Armchair mapping in this case. At the moment there isn't much Strava Heatmap at way 1391388874, and nei... commented 2025-08-20 17:33:06 UTC by Reitstoen ♦44 |
| 170717297 (Comments: 3) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 43) | W teorii faktycznie nie mają. W praktyce skoro nie można na nich powodować zagrożenia w ruchu drogowym/lądowym (?) to czy jest to rzeczywiście prawnie usankcjonowany brak limitu prędkości? Tu chyba można dyskutować. Mogę wycofać ten... commented 2025-08-20 17:29:38 UTC by dzamper ♦131 |
| 157179024 (Comments: 2) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hallo mcliquid, der Bach war etwas zu lang eingezeichnet. Auf der anderen Seite des Kamms ist eine fluchtende Erosionsrinne. Bach jenseits des Kamms ist gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170739039#map=16/47.33360/10.14267&... commented 2025-08-20 17:24:41 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦21 |
 | 169052401 (Comments: 1) | seav (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hotel commented 2025-08-20 17:21:41 UTC by Abbymaria ♦1 |
| 170713080 (Comments: 3) | gallseife (Discussed changesets: 33) | Danke für das Wiederherstellen. Der wurde Juli 23 eingeweiht, von daher ist es sehr unwahrscheinlich, hätten sie ihn bereits wieder entfernt. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-20 17:11:37 UTC by limes11 ♦912 |
| 170736700 (Comments: 1) | HH23 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag HH Wellicht ook voor moped en mofa? MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 17:10:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 166420491 (Comments: 2) | MarkTobiD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Micha, vielen Dank für die Korrektur. Ich war tatsächlich länger nicht vor Ort, aber bis vor 2024 ging der Wanderweg tatsächlich so entlang. Das war aber nur eine temporäre Behelfs-Umleitung. commented 2025-08-20 17:08:21 UTC by MarkTobiD ♦1 |
| 170737642 (Comments: 2) | demon_box (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ciao ivanbranco, si concordo cambio in note e per il resto a quanto ne so anche "Poren" è l'ennesima storpiatura, i locals mi dicono che si chiama proprio "Monte Porno". Grazie commented 2025-08-20 17:07:58 UTC by demon_box ♦364 |
| 170729443 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | There are two schools here sharing the same landuse area. Please don't tag the name on the overall area. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170729443 commented 2025-08-20 16:58:33 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 170729707 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | Isn't one of these the "High School Academy"? I thought the schools were separate entities... --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170729707 commented 2025-08-20 16:57:25 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 170736160 (Comments: 1) | 1stFrequency (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hey, friend! Riverfront Park already exists! You may want to undo that change. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9606160 commented 2025-08-20 16:53:47 UTC by Kendall County GIS ♦32 |
| 148472716 (Comments: 1) | rabon (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ciao rabon, ti segnalo che "Monte Porno" è la denominazione corretta (anche se può apparire insolita). "Monte Pornio" è soltanto una storpiatura presente su alcune mappe. Non so quante volte ho già... commented 2025-08-20 16:53:02 UTC by demon_box ♦364 |
| 170670885 (Comments: 2) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 142) | Ti chiedo scusa, non avevo visto il disused:amenity, sistemo subito commented 2025-08-20 16:51:09 UTC by damianeue ♦113 |
| 170737163 (Comments: 1) | NittyGrittyInTheCity (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: The source used was MGP Pro 2025.07.27 commented 2025-08-20 16:47:38 UTC by NittyGrittyInTheCity ♦13 |
| 170704813 (Comments: 1) | Sweet Chai (Discussed changesets: 3) | You improved the accuracy of this footprint but it is still inaccurate. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a d... commented 2025-08-20 16:35:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170735843 (Comments: 1) | Stefan Haeder (Discussed changesets: 7) | Moin Stefan, kleine Tips, wie deine Arbeit noch besser aussehen kann: - Objekte die in der Realität nahezu rechtwinklig sind können wir auch rechtwinklig machen. Drücke dafür die Taste "Q" nach der Vergabe ... commented 2025-08-20 16:33:40 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,520 |
| 170579432 (Comments: 2) | ptravadactyl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Updated. Was set using Every Door and must have either been off on the imagery. commented 2025-08-20 16:29:53 UTC by ptravadactyl ♦1 |
| 170526627 (Comments: 3) | Evros1969 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ah, danke! Das sind dann quasi Werbetafeln. Dafür sind zum Beispiel diese Tags ganz gut: man_made=advertising advertising=billboard Gebäude sind es jedoch keine. Das müsstest du bitte umändern. commented 2025-08-20 16:24:59 UTC by söm4324 ♦45 |
| 170734543 (Comments: 2) | FdeM0165 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Charging_station? Meer gebruikelijk als hoofdtag en geeft ook een symbool. Kijk even in de wiki... brand ipv manufacturer ? commented 2025-08-20 16:21:49 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170479277 (Comments: 5) | HeilWolf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Herzlichen Dank für deine Anmerkungen, denen ich voll und ganz zustimme. Das OSM-Projekt ist inzwischen so groß geworden und hat so viele aktive Mapper, dass jede Weiterentwicklung einen enormen bürokratischen Aufwand hinter sich zieh... commented 2025-08-20 16:07:57 UTC by HeilWolf ♦4 |
| 170057288 (Comments: 1) | jarzyna ze szczuczyna (Discussed changesets: 2) | No i po kiego grzyba przywróciłeś secondary przez Most Staromiejski? Serio uważasz, że przeprawa z ograniczeniem do 8 ton jest istotna z punktu widzenia całego województwa? commented 2025-08-20 16:01:50 UTC by Szymson ♦388 |
 | 170682852 (Comments: 2) | LakeHulun (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Thanks for reaching out. I was able to verify that there is a roadway here that supports thru traffic for driving access with the imagery cited. Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which... commented 2025-08-20 15:59:48 UTC by LakeHulun ♦5 |
| 170704452 (Comments: 1) | WoofDriver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Please do not removed driveways if they do exist on the ground. Driveways are valid data and removing them in incorrect. Removing valid data is actually considered vandalism. They are not redundant, as you have not replaced the... commented 2025-08-20 15:58:14 UTC by MassCartog ♦139 |
| 170733232 (Comments: 1) | Zolitron (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi :) wenn du das änderst solltest du auch immer auf den obersten access-Wert achten. Den hast du nämlich vergessen zu löschen. Guck es dir vielleicht nochmal an. cheers --- ... commented 2025-08-20 15:56:54 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,520 |
| 170679811 (Comments: 2) | ArinosRiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Enock4seth, In this changeset I aligned roads using Esri World Imagery which is consistent with GPS traces and Strava traces in the area. Would you be able to further clarify what specific issue your seeing with the edits in this changeset?<... commented 2025-08-20 15:56:07 UTC by ArinosRiver ♦1 |
| 170704193 (Comments: 1) | Sweet Chai (Discussed changesets: 3) | You spotted buildings in the imagery but the footprints you've mapped are not as accurate as the imagery allows. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent... commented 2025-08-20 15:52:03 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170733817 (Comments: 1) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2755183890 Pozdrawiam... commented 2025-08-20 15:42:12 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170728050 (Comments: 1) | salmaelt1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You inadvertently dragged part of a building and a fence on Old Queen Street onto traffic lights on Broad Sanctuary. I've restored them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170733792 commented 2025-08-20 15:37:48 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170684947 (Comments: 1) | PaulNPeterson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Some of the features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it... commented 2025-08-20 15:37:37 UTC by MassCartog ♦139 |
| 170617400 (Comments: 5) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tabiki nasıl isterseniz commented 2025-08-20 15:37:27 UTC by dıscover ♦1 |
| 170730864 (Comments: 1) | DutchJohan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag DutchJohan, Je speeltuin staat al op de kaart als vlak. Ik het de dubbele vermelding verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 15:31:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170730977 (Comments: 1) | sv Parkhout (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback name=Kleedkamers heb ik aangepast naar description=... . MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 170698130 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | You seem aware that snapping the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths is generally not accurate. You deleted one of these footprints which makes the warning go away, but you did not address its root cause (f... commented 2025-08-20 15:26:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170732734 (Comments: 1) | Kormoran Niesulice (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-20 15:21:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170733045 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 521) | Patrz https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uporczywe-zmiany-drog-przypadek-usera-perimex/65355/ i https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/polnocna-obwodnica-milanowka-skad-sie-tu-wziela/130426 commented 2025-08-20 15:20:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170732907 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 521) | Patrz https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uporczywe-zmiany-drog-przypadek-usera-perimex/65355/ i https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/polnocna-obwodnica-milanowka-skad-sie-tu-wziela/130426 commented 2025-08-20 15:17:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170729074 (Comments: 1) | Pere Antoni (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yet another "fake" city added... PLEASE read the wiki about what a "city" is in OSM, thank you: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity especially this part "Use the place=city tag to identify the l... commented 2025-08-20 15:02:17 UTC by acubens71 ♦32 |
| 170697972 (Comments: 3) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | Okay. Personally I request review of changes I am unsure about. Sometimes I upload changes I am not certain about in one changeset/save and add the review requested tag to those. This allows others to filter for those changesets. Please upload... commented 2025-08-20 14:59:03 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170685805 (Comments: 1) | Exterprook58 (Discussed changesets: 7) | The operator is London Overground https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7147509522#map=19/51.648031/-0.052630 commented 2025-08-20 14:58:14 UTC by DaveF ♦1,572 |
| 170635526 (Comments: 5) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-20 14:57:56 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 169569416 (Comments: 1) | tagishsimon (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Simon, I've retagged this as "historic building" because it's not been an actual pub for years, but it historically was one, and the architecture is notable. The White House Kitchen, which currently occupies the building, is ta... commented 2025-08-20 14:52:01 UTC by lottie1040 ♦6 |
| 170717444 (Comments: 1) | Galaxy Movers Calgary (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I noticed you made a succession of changes to this house, to add what I presume is your moving company, based out of your home. With the mix of business and home tags you added, you ended up having effectively deleted the house itself. ... commented 2025-08-20 14:42:10 UTC by hoserab ♦200 |
| 170728122 (Comments: 2) | SalvadorBiedma (Discussed changesets: 3) | P. D. (corrección): Para etiquetar la oficina de una empresa de control de plagas, puede usar «craft=pest_control» u «office=pest_control»: osm.wiki/Tag:shop%3Dpest_control. La clave «shop» se reserva para e... commented 2025-08-20 14:40:21 UTC by dcapillae ♦371 |
| X | 170666958 (Comments: 1) | SL512 (Discussed changesets: 3) | That tree is at zero island! commented 2025-08-20 14:23:05 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,210 |
| 170606502 (Comments: 2) | R0adWarri0r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! There was a "fixme" to check if the transformerstation was still there. It is, but behind a wooden fence. "55254, Dong energy" is the info on the transformerstation, I'm guessing it's the station number. |
| 170438758 (Comments: 1) | Knochen Kotzer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, der gesamte Struck befindet sich bereits in einem Naturschutzgebiet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40950915). Ich denke, es ist daher nicht notwendig, die beiden Flächen (scrub + grassland) extra als nature_reserve zu markieren. commented 2025-08-20 13:58:43 UTC by andyblueg ♦6 |
| 170728393 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170728621 commented 2025-08-20 13:56:37 UTC by TinPetreković ♦110 |
| 170700411 (Comments: 2) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 166) | Todavía no commented 2025-08-20 13:47:21 UTC by AgusQui ♦582 |
| 164928991 (Comments: 3) | Evgeniya_rocketdata (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hello! Okay, we will double-check AikBank offices. We will take the information regarding the pins on the site into account in our future work, thank you very much! Best regards commented 2025-08-20 13:44:14 UTC by Evgeniya_rocketdata ♦15 |
| 170667102 (Comments: 1) | flip007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this playground already exists in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8079733 with more detail so I removed the one you added. commented 2025-08-20 13:42:52 UTC by Axel Flordal ♦7 |
| 170619596 (Comments: 1) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merhaba. Sitenin sınırlarını işaretlerken(way/1423050167) building=residential değil, landuse=residential kullanılmalı. commented 2025-08-20 13:36:14 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦65 |
| 170685186 (Comments: 3) | Clitheroe Warrior (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sounds good to me, thanks for checking :) commented 2025-08-20 13:36:11 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 170688895 (Comments: 3) | Martin Ligabue (Discussed changesets: 20) | That's on me, I misjudged which aerial map was used, reverting now, I'll try again later whn I'm on pc commented 2025-08-20 13:24:42 UTC by Martin Ligabue ♦27 |
| 170725887 (Comments: 1) | Diş Hekimi Merve Gündüz KANAT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yolu yanlışlıkla mı konumlandırdınız? Hava görüntüsüne göre orada bina var. commented 2025-08-20 13:21:52 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦93 |
| 170064542 (Comments: 2) | Penegal (Discussed changesets: 17) | Bonjour. Ah, tiens ? Erreur de ma part ; je pensais avoir remis les membres dans le bon ordre… Merci pour la correction ! commented 2025-08-20 13:17:57 UTC by Penegal ♦26 |
| 170691662 (Comments: 1) | Belisarius33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lütfen isimlendirme yaparken kısaltma kullanmayın. Teşekkürler. commented 2025-08-20 13:10:57 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦93 |
| 170711271 (Comments: 1) | interaktivist (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wieso löschen? Was ist mit den Daten für den Nachfolger, "Shambala" - Yoga. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/718495466#map=19/51.434582/7.010250&layers=N commented 2025-08-20 13:01:26 UTC by vogelfreier ♦92 |
| 167571777 (Comments: 2) | MrLusignana (Discussed changesets: 8) | Grazie per avermi segnalato l'errore. Devo aver spostato il monumento per sbaglio quando ho modificato la strada/il sentiero adiacente. Mi scuso! Ho corretto la posizione. commented 2025-08-20 12:59:33 UTC by MrLusignana ♦7 |
| 170638605 (Comments: 1) | Battall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, il sınırlarına ilişkin veriye nereden ulaştınız? commented 2025-08-20 12:53:12 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦93 |
| 170719184 (Comments: 2) | Oscar Nagel (Discussed changesets: 1) | added playground =seesaw commented 2025-08-20 12:50:58 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170669643 (Comments: 2) | MoistTangerine2 (Discussed changesets: 11) | "Landuse", not "building". commented 2025-08-20 12:47:44 UTC by MoistTangerine2 ♦15 |
| 170265007 (Comments: 3) | ChrisFromRV (Discussed changesets: 136) | Ich hab dieses Changeset revertiert, da sich ChrisFromRV nicht mehr dazu geäußert hat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170724455 commented 2025-08-20 12:43:19 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
 | 170599877 (Comments: 4) | mustwinelite (Discussed changesets: 2) | amend, paragraph 1 >> The following are facts, i have been blocked by you, and so has mustwinelite << commented 2025-08-20 12:41:42 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170720166 (Comments: 2) | Piotr Strębski (Discussed changesets: 181) | poprawione commented 2025-08-20 12:36:03 UTC by Piotr Strębski ♦179 |
| 170570557 (Comments: 1) | Alp Utku (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hava görüntüsünde 3 adet ayrı ev gözükmekte. Binalar yıkılıp yerine farklı bir bina mı yapıldı? Neden birleştirerek yeni bir bina oluşturdunuz? commented 2025-08-20 12:23:49 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦93 |
| 170570210 (Comments: 1) | Alp Utku (Discussed changesets: 3) | Parkı silmek yerine yeniden konulmadırabilirsiniz. Hem böylece elementin geçmişini de korumuş olursunuz. Ayrıca lütfen açıklamayı doğru yapın. Teşekkürler. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_his... commented 2025-08-20 12:20:36 UTC by custodiankeyy ♦93 |
| 170672672 (Comments: 1) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ser bra ut, denne har fått både mtb:scale og class:bicycle:mtb slik jeg tror du ønsket. commented 2025-08-20 12:13:47 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 170722515 (Comments: 1) | RicoElectrico (Discussed changesets: 43) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345034680 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-08-20 12:13:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170672392 (Comments: 1) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ser at du har lagt inn class:bicycle:mtb = 0 class:bicycle:mtb:1 = 1 men den siste av disse vil ikke fungere (class:bicycle:mtb:1 er ikke en godkjent "tag"), og den førstnevnte vil i praksis heller ikke gjøre noe siden 0... commented 2025-08-20 12:12:45 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 170644109 (Comments: 2) | Jeff Ferrari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks buy_osmand. I might add: I made this edit due to the very high number of Lyft riders misrouting going to Marquis at Treetops… trying to help reduce driver frustration :) commented 2025-08-20 12:07:05 UTC by Jeff Ferrari ♦1 |
| 170615671 (Comments: 3) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Eklediğiniz otellerin faal olduğunu belirtmek için tourism=hotel etiketleri eklemeniz gerek. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=hotel commented 2025-08-20 12:05:57 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦65 |
| 170568316 (Comments: 2) | Hedaja (Discussed changesets: 32) | Thanks for noticing. Seems like I accidentally copied something. Fixed commented 2025-08-20 12:04:09 UTC by Hedaja ♦136 |
| 170720630 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 29) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395529318 |
| 158152736 (Comments: 1) | adrian87bp (Discussed changesets: 1) | El ayuntamiento es addr:city=Trescasas commented 2025-08-20 11:53:39 UTC by Arturo Francisco Barbero ♦51 |
| 166730858 (Comments: 4) | mountainscaper (Discussed changesets: 1) | In privato gli ho scritto 1 mese fa e ha totalmente ignorato, anche se ha continuato a pubblicare modifiche in altri sentieri. Per il revert mi stavo informando, sarebbe da fare con JOSM da quello che ho capito commented 2025-08-20 11:46:59 UTC by Davide Cozzi ♦1 |
| 170563971 (Comments: 1) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merhaba. Bitişik blokları tek bina olarak çizdiğiniz bir notta belirtildiği için şu binayı sildiğinizi söylemişsiniz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545915000 Binayı geri aldım. Bitişik bloklar, tek bina şekli... commented 2025-08-20 11:41:19 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦65 |
| 170583515 (Comments: 2) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Şu park yolunu neden sildiniz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206127544 commented 2025-08-20 11:40:15 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦65 |
| 158807385 (Comments: 2) | gaugau7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I will go check it next week, but I'm pretty sure there is a " private path " label on the trees at the southern entry of the path I'll keep updated commented 2025-08-20 11:39:55 UTC by gaugau7 ♦2 |
| 170577264 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170720353 commented 2025-08-20 11:29:23 UTC by IvaLedinščak ♦32 |
| 170378415 (Comments: 5) | fmc_9 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Der ist durch einen teils 2 Meter breiten Grünstreifen mit Bäumen und kleinen Büschen bau(m)lich getrennt, kann also extra erfasst werden. Natürlich inklusive der Baumreihe, Grünstreifens und der diversen Durchgänge. commented 2025-08-20 11:25:25 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
 | 131172755 (Comments: 1) | ItsDurian (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Bandar Serenia shouldn't be ref=10 I think commented 2025-08-20 11:24:38 UTC by angys ♦378 |
| 170715554 (Comments: 1) | CielMC (Discussed changesets: 1) | The software's label is misleading, and they are unnecessary. But this is unnecessary. The buildings are simply numbered blocks. We are mostly using `addr:housename=` for the estate/facility name, to handle separately from the buildings. commented 2025-08-20 11:24:32 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,581 |
| 170715730 (Comments: 8) | TozzaEU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahh... Onze berichten kruisten elkaar.. Ik denk dat het nu goed is.. ook gezien je aanwijzingen. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 11:21:30 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170609888 (Comments: 2) | Takaoshi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dobra, już odwróciłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170719310 commented 2025-08-20 11:10:47 UTC by SzymonH ♦210 |
| 170719024 (Comments: 1) | ZekOwney (Discussed changesets: 13) | Correction : Ajout STEP Lonrai, Ajout STEP inconnue de SANDRE (liée à la prison ?) commented 2025-08-20 11:10:33 UTC by ZekOwney ♦17 |
| 170719158 (Comments: 1) | rokas_osm (Discussed changesets: 14) | This might need to be remapped as soon as the modernisation construction work is finished : https://www.bls.ch/de/unternehmen/projekte-und-hintergruende/bauprojekte/bahnhof-zell commented 2025-08-20 11:08:55 UTC by rokas_osm ♦8 |
| 169507345 (Comments: 1) | S1eK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Kennst Du Dich da aus? (ich nicht!) Dürfen hier wieder Autos fahren? Wenn ja dann sollte man auch das access=no löschen. Solange das da steht darf da eigentlich auch kein Fußgänger durch! Keine KFZ wäre motor_v... commented 2025-08-20 10:58:47 UTC by Senihtu ♦82 |
| 166496956 (Comments: 3) | geomaniX (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170718420 commented 2025-08-20 10:55:41 UTC by geomaniX ♦42 |
| 170702657 (Comments: 15) | Martijn1980 (Discussed changesets: 2) | OSM houdt je in ieder geval niet van de straat :) commented 2025-08-20 10:54:32 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170574798 (Comments: 1) | dıscover (Discussed changesets: 6) | Eklediğiniz internet sitesindeki adres sorguladığında Dağ Holding'in sokağın diğer tarafında olduğu görünüyor. Yanlış yere eklenmiş. commented 2025-08-20 10:40:36 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦65 |
| 170673874 (Comments: 3) | Kieshiuz (Discussed changesets: 1) | A, matau, yra tie „gumbeliai“. Na tada gal ir gerai :-) Sėkmės commented 2025-08-20 10:28:21 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,969 |
| 170573957 (Comments: 3) | jmaspons (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ho he repassat tot i he corregit els errors a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170716173 Moltes gràcies per avisar! commented 2025-08-20 10:10:48 UTC by jmaspons ♦64 |
 | 170430680 (Comments: 1) | Becky Candy (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, the tag "healthcare:psychotherapist" doesn't exist. It's either healthcare=psychotherapist, or "health_specialty:psychotherapy" commented 2025-08-20 09:48:54 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 127655937 (Comments: 6) | mxkllnr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bitte um einen Nachweis (vor Ort Besichtigung oder ähnliches) für die Löschung. Hier die Faktenlage aus dem Bebauungsplan des Landkreises die zeigt, dass dieser Pfad sich in einer Waldfläche befindet für das eben keine Erlaub... commented 2025-08-20 09:47:36 UTC by mxkllnr ♦1 |
| 170712050 (Comments: 2) | MMFSoftwares (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Hinweis! In dem Änderungssatz hatte ich leider noch einen Knoten aus dem Kroatien-Urlaub drin. Das ist mir in der Map2Go-App nicht aufgefallen. commented 2025-08-20 09:46:07 UTC by MMFSoftwares ♦1 |
| 166378113 (Comments: 1) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Usunąłem nazwę opisową parkingu i zastąpiłem tagiem access. commented 2025-08-20 09:30:08 UTC by uprkos ♦49 |
| 166377897 (Comments: 2) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Usunąłem nazwy opisowe. commented 2025-08-20 09:25:21 UTC by uprkos ♦49 |
| 170596649 (Comments: 4) | Pan_Nug (Discussed changesets: 5) | Noted, thanks for your input. commented 2025-08-20 09:25:18 UTC by Pan_Nug ♦6 |
| 138160811 (Comments: 1) | Aury88 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ciao Aury88, ma queste way sono davvero drive-through? "un tipo di servizio da asporto fornito da un'azienda che consente ai clienti di acquistare prodotti senza lasciare l'auto" commented 2025-08-20 09:11:43 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,769 |
| 168746431 (Comments: 2) | Fifco1 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ďakujem za opravu. commented 2025-08-20 09:10:22 UTC by Fifco1 ♦16 |
| 154944886 (Comments: 1) | Cristian1989 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Cristian, non sono esperto di power mapping e sono curioso, come mai hai cambiato da power=line a power=minor_line? Leggo nella wiki: "Very high-voltage lines at more than 150 kV, or which form part of a [W] transmission ... commented 2025-08-20 09:09:14 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,769 |
| 170602245 (Comments: 2) | Pascal1909 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hallo Metzor. Guter Punkt, vielen Dank für deine Hinweise & Unterstützung! Grüße aus Rt Pascal commented 2025-08-20 09:05:30 UTC by Pascal1909 ♦8 |
| 170712110 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 29) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423511878<... commented 2025-08-20 09:01:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170690598 (Comments: 3) | Allytat2504 (Discussed changesets: 1) | For cropland, allowing for the margins is probably the right approach if they’re big margins, or if they contain vastly different things from what’s in the field (like trees or scrub). I’m used to mapping mostly sheep pasture, where... commented 2025-08-20 08:55:01 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 170706820 (Comments: 1) | edgard_m (Discussed changesets: 3) | Du skal benytte loc_name:en=Simons Lake for den engelske version af loc_name. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=da#Local_names_(loc_name) Hvor har du navnet fra? commented 2025-08-20 08:43:02 UTC by b-holdet ♦325 |
| 170670103 (Comments: 4) | DurainABC (Discussed changesets: 2) | D'accord, je comprends mieux. Merci pour les explications ! commented 2025-08-20 08:40:45 UTC by DurainABC ♦2 |
| 162312543 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 224) | Correct aangepast thx commented 2025-08-20 08:40:21 UTC by Jakka ♦1,821 |
| 170547042 (Comments: 1) | Rif-Q (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13075272866. What is the mean of the tag n = audy kids? Please notice the difference between a name and a description. A name only object is use less. If you need more information (and c... commented 2025-08-20 08:31:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170709216 (Comments: 1) | edgard_m (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hej, du skriver at du angiver lokale navne. Vil du i så fald være så venlig at bruge tagget 'loc_name=*' på søerne. commented 2025-08-20 08:25:01 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,670 |
| 170687050 (Comments: 1) | Im Fokus (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ja ihr habt recht ... es war spät und ne lange Fahrt ... man kann/darf hier natürlich nicht nach Nordwesten abbiegen ... commented 2025-08-20 08:19:19 UTC by Ana Luisa ♦24 |
| 170707066 (Comments: 1) | Bene83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Bene83, willkommen bei OSM :) Bist du sicher, dass diese Grundstücksauffahrt einen gewidmeten Straßennamen hat? Du hast leider keine Quelle angegeben, deswegen kann ich nicht erkennen, woher die Info stammt. Viele Gr... commented 2025-08-20 08:03:25 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170677155 (Comments: 1) | coucaal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for refining this! Just FYI, in changest #170708973 https://osmcha.org/changesets/170708973 I fixed and refined the geometry and end tagging of the footways leading to the tennis courts to be more precise and consistent, and also added access ... commented 2025-08-20 07:58:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦40 |
| 170680116 (Comments: 1) | DurainABC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité de l'un (et probablement deux) itinéraire(s), en ne remettant pas les membres dans l'ordre. Il semble que Vespucci soit moins performant que JOSM ou iD sur l'ordre... commented 2025-08-20 07:57:21 UTC by StC ♦310 |
| 170697669 (Comments: 1) | Edit on the fly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Edit on the fly, danke für Deine Beiträge, aber bist Du dir sicher, dass es auf dem Parkareal "Weg: 69563667" 11 ausgewiesene Behindertenparplätze (capacity:disabled) gibt? VG pitfire commented 2025-08-20 07:41:26 UTC by pitfire ♦670 |
| 170707956 (Comments: 1) | Gleb_Artyomenko (Discussed changesets: 29) | clarification road geometry was fixed based, road name was added on Esri World Imagery #mapbox_linters commented 2025-08-20 07:29:10 UTC by Gleb_Artyomenko ♦29 |
| 170613305 (Comments: 1) | Bratkó József (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! I searched the key statistics (taginfo.osm.org) and the wiki (wiki.osm.org) and found no reference to assistance dogs. This does not surprise me, as such dogs are legally allowed in areas where dogs are otherwise prohibited. Nevertheless, I th... commented 2025-08-20 07:26:13 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170692336 (Comments: 1) | 7beren (Discussed changesets: 4) | 7beren, Hier mis ik nog een highway=crossing MVG eggie commented 2025-08-20 07:24:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170692574 (Comments: 1) | 7beren (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag 7beren... Lijkt me oke zo. Groet eggie commented 2025-08-20 07:22:57 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170702505 (Comments: 2) | Martijn1980 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het wegdeel dat uit het lood lag bij de brug het ik teruggelegd. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170702505 commented 2025-08-20 07:20:09 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170691340 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:20:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170691271 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:56 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170691285 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:50 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170691222 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170690789 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170690618 (Comments: 1) | Basura UE (Discussed changesets: 6) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-20 07:19:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170688643 (Comments: 3) | CmdrPluisNL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Knooppunt 78 gesorteerd commented 2025-08-20 07:17:00 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170575658 (Comments: 4) | Atypique (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merci en fait j'étais sur l'application organic-map et pas sur le sit de osm. Mais c'est bon j'ai modifié le Siret. Bonne journée commented 2025-08-20 07:15:34 UTC by Atypique ♦1 |
| 170150277 (Comments: 1) | NVBW_Edit_Eifelkobold (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, access=destination kann es nicht geben (dafür gibt es kein Schild): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33384899/history commented 2025-08-20 07:13:53 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170664343 (Comments: 2) | sayido (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170707134 commented 2025-08-20 07:13:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170649513 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please don't remove non-"standard" names. Change them to other `*_name=` to show that. commented 2025-08-20 07:10:30 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,581 |
| 170578859 (Comments: 5) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 57) | Dat was een lange discussie en er greep er al één bij naar popcorn Frederik Ramm heeft mijns inziens het meest gelijk met, kort gezegd: Map what is on the ground. Ik las ook: dat het soms geaccepteerd wordt als het nog verband houd met ... commented 2025-08-20 07:10:20 UTC by Op'tRad ♦45 |
| 163499002 (Comments: 1) | Billy78945 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, See this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions It seems your are using the nametag for the description! We don't use name=highway for every highway or name=river for every river don't we?<... commented 2025-08-20 07:03:27 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 158842967 (Comments: 1) | Thurgau Tourismus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Der Kiesstrand war schon hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275509194 Ich habe die beiden Dinge zusammengeführt, und wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4919445 den Namen entfernt. commented 2025-08-20 06:52:31 UTC by habi ♦1,869 |
| 156985992 (Comments: 2) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hallo Marc, Ik ben dat stukje vergeten en herinner me niet meer waar het om ging, maar ik zal er nog eens naar kijken. Ik vermoed dat het was omdat ik constateerde dat de grintbakken op het Circuit Zandvoort als zand (natural sand?) gemapt stonden... commented 2025-08-20 06:46:48 UTC by Op'tRad ♦45 |
| 170690356 (Comments: 1) | vasmap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Bei Kindergärten, Schulen, Feuerwachen etc. kommen die Daten in der Regel an das Gelände und nicht an das Gebäude. In deinem Beispiel heißt das: a... commented 2025-08-20 06:32:41 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170701782 (Comments: 2) | shax13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thank you for the comment. I am just getting started with mapping. Will look into it. :) commented 2025-08-20 06:13:27 UTC by shax13 ♦1 |
| 170449894 (Comments: 2) | onomatopoeia (Discussed changesets: 2) | To citrula, with your experience, please do indicate in writing, which will be the appropriate variant if `name` is unaccepted by local community https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Variants ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْك... commented 2025-08-20 06:09:30 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170687643 (Comments: 1) | BubaNL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-20 05:51:56 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170689765 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 94) | Is there a reason for you to make so much multipolygons? BTW someone else uploaded the buildings right before you, some of them are duplicated. commented 2025-08-20 05:27:02 UTC by Lejun ♦489 |
| 170701947 (Comments: 1) | Raven Scales (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the two buildings addressed relations should be redone as simple polygons with out the join commented 2025-08-20 05:18:51 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170701956 (Comments: 1) | Leo984567 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, there are two buildings at 316 and both are addressed as unit 1. I expect that one should be unit 2 commented 2025-08-20 05:03:17 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170672447 (Comments: 1) | Zismac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Zismac, building=wharenui isn't an avaliable tag right now for us to use, but the most appropriate tags for Wharenui across NZ are amenity=community_centre, building=yes & community_centre=meeting_room that defines their usage & promi... commented 2025-08-20 04:54:15 UTC by EleGlobe ♦5 |
| 169814461 (Comments: 3) | bluegibberish (Discussed changesets: 4) | Не люблю такую последовательность слов, но ладно. commented 2025-08-20 04:49:41 UTC by Grass-snake ♦236 |
| 170697618 (Comments: 1) | Elia Stellios (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this polygon appears to only cover part of the building footprint. commented 2025-08-20 04:45:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170685513 (Comments: 5) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wellicht is footway hier beter? Up to you. commented 2025-08-20 04:41:03 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170682748 (Comments: 3) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hoi.. Je zou eens naar editor josm kunnen kijken. Veel meer overzicht en een goede foutenanalyse. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-20 04:35:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170701452 (Comments: 1) | jake-low (Discussed changesets: 5) | Changeset comment got cut off. Was supposed to say: South San Francisco, CA: categorize footways around El Camino High School as either sidewalk or crossing commented 2025-08-20 04:35:12 UTC by jake-low ♦12 |
| 170697542 (Comments: 1) | JARRODLUCAS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, could you check if https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419093565#map=19/-37.875809/145.133717 should be moved to the right where there is a building with no address. I think this node might have been accidentally shifted. commented 2025-08-20 04:30:39 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170644162 (Comments: 1) | jtbaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | I, buy_osmand, has read the wiki and stand by jtbaker on his actions taken for the improvement of his local community. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Common_values AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕ ... commented 2025-08-20 04:12:50 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170699123 (Comments: 1) | AbnerR33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are inaccurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like ... commented 2025-08-20 03:29:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170698171 (Comments: 1) | Miguel Angel L (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in the imagery but generally mapped their footprints oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues l... commented 2025-08-20 03:12:35 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170698198 (Comments: 1) | Lizette Llamas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! The footprint shape looks appropriately unsquared. Please report the source(s) you used for the information you tagged on this footprint. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source Please keep this feedback in mind... commented 2025-08-20 03:07:47 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170698202 (Comments: 1) | dpcastrob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You've spotted buildings and constructions here ,but many are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like dat... commented 2025-08-20 03:01:21 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170698206 (Comments: 1) | AHvazquez (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Many of the footprints yo added here envelope multiple buildings. Each building should be mapped with its own footprint. Use plots, shadows, and colours to discriminate between adjacent buildings. Please keep this feed... commented 2025-08-20 02:41:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170698218 (Comments: 1) | Miguel Angel L (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! I think you enveloped 2 buildings using 1 footprint here. Each building should be represented by one footprint. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimat... commented 2025-08-20 02:38:06 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170698235 (Comments: 1) | AHvazquez (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You identified buildings in imagery and ingeneral appropriately squared them however the imagery allows for them to be more accurate as they are generally oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accuratel... commented 2025-08-20 02:34:47 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170697901 (Comments: 2) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | will consider ur observations for future mapping:) commented 2025-08-20 02:28:10 UTC by Johnatan Reyes ♦2 |
| 170697732 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | Why did you position the footprint in this way? Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https:... commented 2025-08-20 02:17:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170697671 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | A valid footprint. It could be a touch smaller; roofs tend to overhang walls. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can f... commented 2025-08-20 02:06:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170697653 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | Looks like you included some of the building's shadow in its footprint resulting in it being slightly oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and pr... commented 2025-08-20 02:03:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170681749 (Comments: 1) | r37 (Discussed changesets: 2) | A big thank you for the ground_survey❗❕ with this, other cyclists would be able to plan their routes prior and have a very smooth ride, rather than needing to find a detour mid way 😄😁 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA... commented 2025-08-20 02:03:29 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170697663 (Comments: 1) | Johnatan Reyes (Discussed changesets: 7) | A valid and accurate building footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/ |
| 170696721 (Comments: 1) | FerPapaqui (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. You generally correctly identified buildings in imagery, but they are ever so slightly oversized. I noticed you looked at various imageries, when a building appears the same on two imagery sources you can trace it using the higher res... commented 2025-08-20 01:58:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170696958 (Comments: 1) | pastelin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. You created overlapping footprints here becasue the orientation of the one I flagged is inaccurate. Zooming in and out can aid interpretation of shape and orientation. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Tha... commented 2025-08-20 01:46:38 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170592825 (Comments: 3) | taki3hira (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for the easy-to-understand video. I'll use it as reference for future mapping. commented 2025-08-20 01:30:09 UTC by taki3hira ♦15 |
| 170695946 (Comments: 1) | waggii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Overall the building footpritns you added are accurate, however the one I flagged actually envelopes 2 buildings. The landuse you tagged as farmland would more accurately be tagged as orchard. The track you added looka like it may not be a highway, b... commented 2025-08-20 01:10:24 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170661845 (Comments: 2) | Sparnonien (Discussed changesets: 7) | bonjour . je l'ai supprimé merci commented 2025-08-20 01:03:01 UTC by Sparnonien ♦5 |
| 167519410 (Comments: 1) | Bzyzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, Bzyzz. Thank you for your contributions! I saw that the node for the Prince Rupert train station might have accidentally been dragged a couple hundred meters into a residential area. I went ahead and undid that here: https://www.ope... commented 2025-08-20 01:02:58 UTC by clay_c ♦516 |
| 170061501 (Comments: 1) | StijnDP (Discussed changesets: 4) | ik ben wat hesitant om footpath te gebruiken omdat er vaak geen fysiek 'voetpad' bord aanwezig is. Path is generiek en laat fietsers ook toe. commented 2025-08-20 01:02:24 UTC by kabelhaai ♦40 |
| 170692894 (Comments: 3) | descilla (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nur zur Info: Die kann man in JOSM mit dem Preset "Pferdesport" taggen (den man leider mit der Suchfunktion nicht findet wenn man nach "reit" sucht). commented 2025-08-20 00:52:00 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦783 |
| 170695954 (Comments: 2) | Sweet Chai (Discussed changesets: 3) | See my resolution in https://osmcha.org/changesets/170696301 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170695954 commented 2025-08-20 00:45:14 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170695959 (Comments: 1) | Shaylim Miranda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. You correctly identified a building in the imagery, but mapped its footprint inaccurately becasue you did not account for the fact that a part of its roof is obscured by vegetation. See how I mapped it here https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2025-08-20 00:37:53 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 155044266 (Comments: 1) | sourcemaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi sourcemaster, ESRI's address database has this house numbered 2702, and the other houses on this side of the street have even numbers. Are you sure this house number should be 2701? I will be over here in a few days to survey ho... commented 2025-08-20 00:24:43 UTC by FeetAndInches ♦9 |
| 170645107 (Comments: 1) | pipigong (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The school does not only occupy the buildings but also the grounds. The school boundary can be found in the DCS Base Map. I have made the change. commented 2025-08-20 00:16:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,670 |
 | 170506011 (Comments: 13) | buy_osmand (Discussed changesets: 53) | Correct, you have made your decline to the invitation publicly known. Good day. I'm just minding my own business to earn my 11oz of silver ☺ https://ministryofhealth.substack.com/p/43-the-currency-of-the-redeemed-living commented 2025-08-20 00:16:05 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170645673 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Cheers for pointing this out to me. I will fix this and other relations with this issue. Thanks again, Lachlan commented 2025-08-20 00:12:48 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦18 |
| 170602109 (Comments: 1) | GmTax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert SEO edits added to whole building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695564 commented 2025-08-19 23:59:46 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170602448 (Comments: 1) | GmTax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert SEO edits added to whole building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695564 commented 2025-08-19 23:59:46 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170601505 (Comments: 1) | GmTax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Revert SEO edits added to whole building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695564 commented 2025-08-19 23:59:45 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170543079 (Comments: 2) | ramoncap (Discussed changesets: 1) | I’ve made my suggested changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695530. Please say if you think they’re not correct, thanks commented 2025-08-19 23:58:21 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 170688949 (Comments: 1) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 199) | Trees are highly advanced technology❕🌳May you encounter a giant tree , of multiple stories high to be in awe❕❕ --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1706... commented 2025-08-19 23:52:41 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170679875 (Comments: 2) | seoboost (Discussed changesets: 3) | correction... the max and min age tags are correct commented 2025-08-19 23:17:06 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170586893 (Comments: 2) | Skeed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah check! Ja zolang deze plek te vinden is voor anderen vind ik het allemaal best! Thanks :)! commented 2025-08-19 22:53:32 UTC by Skeed ♦2 |
| 154562996 (Comments: 1) | 8err (Discussed changesets: 8) | Prosim piste lepsie popisy sad zmien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-08-19 22:50:33 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170693552 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 269) | Poprawione, pomyłka ze strony budynków commented 2025-08-19 22:47:27 UTC by syntex ♦871 |
| 168430358 (Comments: 1) | David_Serum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Błędne, opisowe name. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168430358 commented 2025-08-19 22:37:53 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦509 |
| 158080398 (Comments: 5) | Jožo Schwarz (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ja verim, ze to uz coskoro oznacia ako cyklocestu, rozporujem len jej oznacenie ako cyklocestu 10 mesiacov dopredu :) Ano, ak uz je cesta schodna pre chodcov, nevidim problem v jej docasnom oznaceni ako highway=footway a ponechani znacky const... commented 2025-08-19 22:27:38 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170677130 (Comments: 1) | seoboost (Discussed changesets: 3) | You have duplicated the same number under phone and mobile commented 2025-08-19 22:19:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 154412820 (Comments: 5) | mars412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ach, die uralten Schätzchen aus den 80'ern 💡 Da die völlig überholt sind und sich von den neuen Wander-Wegweisern deutlich unterscheiden, kannst du solche auf abandoned=yes setzen. Wenn sie so dennoch weiter in OSM-Wa... commented 2025-08-19 22:16:10 UTC by DeFra85 ♦239 |
 | 159364284 (Comments: 1) | Armand_Rose (Discussed changesets: 6) | Slip roads/ramps are usually considered to "belong" to the through highway they exit and enter - that being the M1 in this case, which is classified as Trunk. commented 2025-08-19 22:15:28 UTC by Himké ♦72 |
| 170693371 (Comments: 1) | seoboost (Discussed changesets: 3) | You have duplicated the phone number with the same number under phone= and mobile= Looks like a phone number. commented 2025-08-19 22:14:39 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 166160854 (Comments: 1) | Matthew Hostak (Discussed changesets: 33) | Zdravim, ten nazov Manta Ray je tam naozaj po anglicky? commented 2025-08-19 22:12:34 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170458856 (Comments: 1) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 37) | Tu nie ma bramy. Skad ją wziales, przytargales na plecach ? commented 2025-08-19 22:03:30 UTC by David_Serum ♦3 |
| X | 170668811 (Comments: 2) | flatmoll (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thanks for pointing that out! I made these changes within a short period, but in different times, and for some reason the app I use stacked them together. Next time I'll sure use the OSM website to make changes in different regions. commented 2025-08-19 21:58:39 UTC by flatmoll ♦2 |
| 170006242 (Comments: 1) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 34) | What's the source of this name? I cannot find anything on the Internet with that name. commented 2025-08-19 21:57:26 UTC by SpinOff ♦298 |
| 167405598 (Comments: 3) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Je vela typov spomalovacov, treba si to pozriet na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming . Treba to rozlisovat, lebo nie vsetky spomaluju vsetky typy vozidiel. Napr. cushion nebrzi autobus (vozidla so sirokym rozchodom), ale auta an... commented 2025-08-19 21:52:23 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 169722154 (Comments: 5) | Bilykralik16 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Chapem ten pracovny nazov. Preto som to nedal do old_name, kedze sa to tak nikdy nevolalo. proposed:name bol docasny pokus, ale to plati pre buducnost, nie minulost. Zmenil som na was:name. Aka je lepsia znacka pre "pracovny nazov"? ... commented 2025-08-19 21:48:37 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 161435596 (Comments: 3) | GJCity (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for the quick response. It looks like the plugin I was using assumed the curb was a blocking barrier which caused the "issue". That was my mistake for not noticing that. The interns tagging scheme is a little odd so if you&... commented 2025-08-19 21:46:41 UTC by Baconcrisp ♦136 |
| 170086029 (Comments: 1) | Radosław Drożdżewski (Discussed changesets: 4) | Jak powstanie, to wtedy zmapujemy. Na razie usunąłem commented 2025-08-19 21:40:46 UTC by SpinOff ♦298 |
| 170516472 (Comments: 1) | BoxingArcher163 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Highway class and highway surface are different things. The line with highway=residential was correct, because it is used to reach the 93C building. I corrected it. commented 2025-08-19 21:23:24 UTC by SpinOff ♦298 |
| 170357437 (Comments: 6) | atticquilt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for your caretaking of the map and thoughtful guidance to our volunteers who are contributing their time and local knowledge to try to improve map data in their communities. We’re reviewing the items you suggested and appreciate the feed... commented 2025-08-19 21:19:28 UTC by atticquilt ♦3 |
| 170631026 (Comments: 1) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 151) | Closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4881922 commented 2025-08-19 21:07:36 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦176 |
| 170690935 (Comments: 3) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Oke.. dat is gelukt met building=office Die andere office=... hoort op de node bij de instelling. Office=government geeft ook een symbool. Gr eggie commented 2025-08-19 20:59:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170676822 (Comments: 4) | PW1996 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem.. Het komt omdat je met de linkermuis selecteert..maar ook schuift met de kaart. Na selectie..onbewust.. schuift niet de kaart maar de node. Mapse.. eggie commented 2025-08-19 20:52:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170691067 (Comments: 1) | Kazik [PL] (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-19 20:51:36 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170635350 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | poprawione commented 2025-08-19 20:25:48 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170688276 (Comments: 1) | Soarex (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Soarex.. Ik heb er weer een highway=path van gemaakt conform de voorgaande tagging. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-19 20:24:20 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170688290 (Comments: 1) | Sans123456789 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je plakt gewoon een rugdeel op een bestaande weg. Dat is niet correct. Ik heb de weg gesplitst op twee plaatsen en daar een brug van gemaakt. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-19 20:22:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170685180 (Comments: 2) | christophenglert (Discussed changesets: 24) | ja, in der Menüauswahl war im Textfeld schon 3-5 eingetragen, daher dachte ich: oh Vorauswahl ist immer gut, das nehm ich! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170685180 ... commented 2025-08-19 20:02:09 UTC by christophenglert ♦8 |
| 165339966 (Comments: 3) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 149) | Hallo Jeroen, Nu zie ik, dat de wijziging in Sint Jansstraat idd ouder en niet van jou is. Ik zal veranderen in de 'echte' naam Provinciale Weg. HG, Jan. commented 2025-08-19 19:31:10 UTC by janhals ♦12 |
| 159318300 (Comments: 4) | spaanse (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bedankt voor de terugkoppeling, dan ga ik eruit halen. commented 2025-08-19 19:12:50 UTC by dikkeknodel ♦286 |
| 170632320 (Comments: 1) | Juan TuTree (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your contribution. What's the source you used to locate these ALPRs? Please be careful to not attach the ALPRs to other features like sidewalks and roads - I fixed a couple of these for you. commented 2025-08-19 19:04:00 UTC by citrula ♦896 |
| 170600063 (Comments: 4) | fbausch (Discussed changesets: 15) | Die 62 war ja doppelt da ich sie paar Tage im Vorraus eingepflegt habe, den der Beginn der Umstrukturierung war ja erst am Montag. Deshalb wollte ich das überschneiden. commented 2025-08-19 19:03:27 UTC by Daniel22Ka ♦17 |
| 162775347 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 162) | Hello Claudius, I am really a little bit shocked about this: "Opened 2021" and "Check 2023" for a subway line, which is now (August 2025) completed by little over 50 %! I am going to update this in a few moments. Regards,... commented 2025-08-19 19:02:00 UTC by AnnaCatarina ♦29 |
| 166026559 (Comments: 1) | EZMVD6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour ces améliorations. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625876134/history c'est voulu d'avoir dis que le cheminement piéton est sous le pont et non pas sur le pont ? car ce noeud est incohér... commented 2025-08-19 19:01:11 UTC by Marc_ch ♦281 |
| 170664657 (Comments: 2) | sayido (Discussed changesets: 2) | Done with https://www.osm.org/changeset/170687683 commented 2025-08-19 18:59:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170681310 (Comments: 1) | Woody365 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Dag Woody, Editor iD is niet echt geschikt om iets met routerelaties te doen. Inleggen lukt soms nog wel, maar bewerken gaat niet met editor iD . Hier lopen ook andere routerelaties en grote kans dat die 'stuk'gaan. Wanneer je... commented 2025-08-19 18:47:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170685066 (Comments: 1) | dkl184 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-19 18:41:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 72501477 (Comments: 2) | matchman (Discussed changesets: 20) | After 3 year of silence I changed it to natural=scrub commented 2025-08-19 18:37:56 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170661407 (Comments: 2) | noenoenoe123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Par contre je ne sais pas ce que signifie exactement brand:wikidata et brand. Je te laisse finaliser la modification, je ne voudrais pas mettre n'importe quoi ! commented 2025-08-19 18:37:39 UTC by noenoenoe123 ♦2 |
| 170503400 (Comments: 3) | papizhulo (Discussed changesets: 1) | merci beaucoup :-) commented 2025-08-19 18:33:17 UTC by Patchanka ♦390 |
| 170671664 (Comments: 3) | Empybean (Discussed changesets: 1) | Na atsargiai su tuo rusišku softu :-) Zverikas jau dešimt metų crappina. commented 2025-08-19 18:29:16 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦1,969 |
| 170647032 (Comments: 5) | Alex Stephen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good to know, thanks @Glassman. commented 2025-08-19 18:27:38 UTC by pwbriggs ♦51 |
| 160696717 (Comments: 1) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hallo Makeena There is this discussion on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mb-downhillstrecken-als-highway-cycleway-getaggt/134276 After reading it I checked how Downhill-Tracks are mapped in Zürich. So I found out, that... commented 2025-08-19 18:20:11 UTC by nurdafur ♦228 |
| 170671036 (Comments: 1) | Qotola (Discussed changesets: 8) | reverted - everything was mapped precisely as it is, there's a gap in the pavement line and a part closer to the house https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170685783 commented 2025-08-19 18:17:54 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170637164 (Comments: 4) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | Poza tym routing nieogarniający multipolygonów to też problem, ale to w przypadku mojej innej zmiany chyba z tagiem access=yes. commented 2025-08-19 18:17:35 UTC by driedfish ♦3 |
| 170576097 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 861) | Bonjour, Désolé pour le boulot inutile sur ce changeset. Je vais faire des contrôles plus rigoureux à l'avenir. commented 2025-08-19 18:14:13 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦92 |
| 170676800 (Comments: 1) | Ticecream (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 18:12:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170676502 (Comments: 1) | PW1996 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 18:09:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170671166 (Comments: 1) | jwm2008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | motor_vehicle=no is for cases where cars are not allowed at all - does not seem to be the case here. I added smoothness=bad tag to try to help with your routing case. You might also have better luck adding an entrance node to the location you are try... commented 2025-08-19 18:05:45 UTC by citrula ♦896 |
| 169971392 (Comments: 1) | NIWE1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi NIWE1, the leisure=park tag is used for recreational parks, not car parking lots (amenity=parking). Since the parking lots were already mapped, I've removed the park areas you added. commented 2025-08-19 17:55:08 UTC by lmum ♦30 |
| 170638056 (Comments: 1) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | W jakim celu? commented 2025-08-19 17:54:19 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,107 |
| 33007036 (Comments: 1) | Luuuddooo (Discussed changesets: 18) | Salut Ludo, J'ai remarqué une petite erreur sur le tag osmc:symbol. La "bonne" valeur est yellow_bar Tu peux peux la tester ici : https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/osmc_symbols.html Cordialement,<... commented 2025-08-19 17:52:36 UTC by pyrog ♦356 |
| 170683540 (Comments: 1) | driedfish (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nie ma potrzeby dodawania `foot=yes` do drogi tego typu, to zbędny tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland commented 2025-08-19 17:48:40 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,107 |
| 170230560 (Comments: 3) | RIL91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, danke fürs Ergänzen der Eingänge Gruss wies1 commented 2025-08-19 17:43:57 UTC by wies1 ♦154 |
| 170652393 (Comments: 1) | Amihan_ir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-19 17:42:13 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 170672351 (Comments: 1) | Auto Peças Lopes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-19 17:41:19 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
 | 170683155 (Comments: 1) | Dante_Garcia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Es correcto, ahi hay una tienda de articulos deportivos commented 2025-08-19 17:36:52 UTC by Jocy0983 ♦1 |
| 110081197 (Comments: 2) | Falsernet (Discussed changesets: 103) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170683167 commented 2025-08-19 17:27:38 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,410 |
| 170660944 (Comments: 1) | unova52 (Discussed changesets: 1) | For routing purposes, it's better to leave the sidewalk as connecting and ending at the road commented 2025-08-19 17:21:31 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 170583816 (Comments: 2) | snail044 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello cquest, thanks for your help! It happend when I added an area with inner relation and I don't know why. From that moment on I considered how to get the forest area back. commented 2025-08-19 17:18:41 UTC by snail044 ♦5 |
| 160368525 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | I see that you added layer=-2 to the sidewalk of Jermyn Street / Duke Street St James. It seem unlikely that it is actually subterranean, so I am guessing that you used Rabid's helpfult feature to let you hide a potential problem with a highway-... commented 2025-08-19 17:11:53 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170674066 (Comments: 1) | Jpnod (Discussed changesets: 2) | The crossing on Kinzie is definitely concrete. Please double check your changes commented 2025-08-19 17:11:09 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 164208705 (Comments: 6) | Đuro Jiří (Discussed changesets: 82) | Le jalon de la déviation est ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13082185600#map=19/43.678142/4.440934&layers=PN Sretan planinarski izlet i još jednom hvala. commented 2025-08-19 17:08:49 UTC by pyrog ♦356 |
| 160447835 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Was there any particular reason why you replaced sidewalk:both=separate with sidewalk=separate on Poland Street, Great Pulteney Street and Lexington Street? (Already fixed by another user) commented 2025-08-19 17:06:16 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170674450 (Comments: 1) | Jpnod (Discussed changesets: 2) | Both sidewalk-alley crossings are clearly concrete in Aerial and streetside imagery commented 2025-08-19 17:05:10 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 160209584 (Comments: 1) | geocruizer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Pedestrian only crossings of public roads in the UK are *never* marked with dashes. The dashed markings on Hulme Street either side of its junction with Cambridge Street are give way markings. They have nothing to do with the crossing other th... commented 2025-08-19 16:51:27 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 170670114 (Comments: 8) | OlafJanssen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dus pas bij opening amenity=archive taggen of office=archive commented 2025-08-19 16:46:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170609101 (Comments: 1) | pyrog (Discussed changesets: 94) | https://gard.ffrandonnee.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/87/2025/07/arrete-st-gilles.pdf commented 2025-08-19 16:42:46 UTC by pyrog ♦356 |
| 169536155 (Comments: 1) | johnde56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed that some edits from a few months ago have been reverted (deletion of the sidewalk:both separate) tag as one example. I'm not sure if that was intentional because the tag was added back a few days later. Could you check that you ha... commented 2025-08-19 16:41:14 UTC by valaise ♦14 |
| 170646060 (Comments: 1) | jassisharma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170646060 commented 2025-08-19 16:39:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170641524 (Comments: 1) | oaomer1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It appears you added a building within a building which another user fixed. In cases like this, just add a node for the teen life center. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/17064152... commented 2025-08-19 16:37:30 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170634649 (Comments: 1) | Stratification (Discussed changesets: 1) | typically the maxspeed is added to the road. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170634649 commented 2025-08-19 16:32:37 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170408659 (Comments: 3) | hchchc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Il problema è che non hai sostituito" un sentiero, lo hai cancellato il sentiero senza preoccuparti di spezzare la relazione. Una cosa è un sentiero nel bosco ed un'altra è credere che un gps sia la verità ass... commented 2025-08-19 16:30:20 UTC by Jrachi ♦775 |
| 170596487 (Comments: 1) | Fekiha Alemu (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. I have reverted th... commented 2025-08-19 16:30:01 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170405454 (Comments: 2) | Shyshka (Discussed changesets: 51) | Дякую! commented 2025-08-19 16:27:23 UTC by Shyshka ♦42 |
| 170597877 (Comments: 1) | agl12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Islands in the sea also need the tag natural-coastline. The outline needs to have the ocean on the right hand side. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland Coastlines in OSM are very different from just about everything else... commented 2025-08-19 16:25:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170409724 (Comments: 2) | VLD299 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello StC, I apologize for my mistake and will try to be more cautious of route connectivity while editing. Thanks for resolving the continuity issue. -Conor commented 2025-08-19 16:22:29 UTC by VLD299 ♦2 |
| 170669845 (Comments: 5) | Siard (Discussed changesets: 4) | Als het niks was kan weg... Soms heb je van de olifantenpaadjes die vanzelf ontstaan door gebruik. Die tag je met highway=path informal=yes path=desire commented 2025-08-19 16:18:45 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170669988 (Comments: 8) | RuudBNL (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Dagricultural commented 2025-08-19 16:16:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170013145 (Comments: 3) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 28) | Bonjour zorun. Merci pour l'invitation, ça fait déjà quelques années que je souhaite y participer, malheureusement sans y parvenir pour l'instant. J'espère donc une prochaine fois ! J'ai pr... commented 2025-08-19 16:09:38 UTC by Lisapple ♦44 |
| 170671289 (Comments: 4) | wegroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | So, if I want to make a conference room rental, should I do it different? I own 5 conferenco room rentals in Warsaw, so I want to do it right... commented 2025-08-19 16:07:00 UTC by wegroup ♦1 |
| 170670102 (Comments: 3) | RuudBNL (Discussed changesets: 6) | In dat geval dus motor_vehicle=yes en de maxwidth:physical=2 toevoegen. commented 2025-08-19 16:04:15 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170483294 (Comments: 2) | Gerold (Discussed changesets: 49) | Ich hab den Zeitplan grad nicht greifbar, die Straße wird aber komplett neu mit geändertem Verlauf gemacht. Vor Ende 2026 würde ich da nicht mit einer Freigabe des neuen Straße rechnen. Den zukünftigen Verlauf findet man au... commented 2025-08-19 15:40:34 UTC by Gerold ♦25 |
 | 152479186 (Comments: 1) | iamsaurabhc (Discussed changesets: 2) | You have incorrectly classified this SH as secondary. You OLA editors should stop copying from google maps. commented 2025-08-19 15:38:32 UTC by Vis_M ♦19 |
| 170670189 (Comments: 2) | open_joe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo David, ja, sorry, ich mache das zum ersten Mal. Ich finde das Feld für den Haupt-Tag nicht. Ja, es ist z.Zt. ein Onlineshop ohne Ladengeschäft. Die Adresse ist der Firmensitz und die Kunden können aber Ihre Artikel dort... commented 2025-08-19 15:37:09 UTC by open_joe ♦1 |
| 170503642 (Comments: 1) | ₘₘ11056 (Discussed changesets: 1) | if this alternate isn't an official trail (like a ducked route around snow) please add informal=yes and a sac_scale= (if suitable). thanks for the update! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.o... commented 2025-08-19 15:24:41 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦107 |
| 170604972 (Comments: 3) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 114) | Plan powstania pełnej dokumentacji został przesunięty na 2027 rok. Decyzja środowiskowa dla zmapowanego wariantu została zaskarżona do SKO w Siedlcach, SKO ją oddalił, ale WSA uchyli decyzję SKO i teraz czekamy na ponowną decyzję SKO. <... commented 2025-08-19 15:24:28 UTC by SpinOff ♦298 |
| 166130616 (Comments: 1) | Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Dani Safa Adi Nugraha, I saw you added a ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385685043) near Kaligawe that isn’t connected to any ferry terminals. The OSM wiki page for ferries states that “The ferry route should ... commented 2025-08-19 15:22:06 UTC by maps_not_naps ♦4 |
| 155394948 (Comments: 1) | ElementoGEO (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello ElementoGEO, I saw you added the route=ferry tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226920744. I am wondering if you know if there are more ferry routes here? I see there are other ways this is connected to such as https://www.openstre... commented 2025-08-19 15:21:07 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦60 |
| 149366012 (Comments: 3) | t_ja (Discussed changesets: 13) | Neviem ako to suvisi s Overpass, ale ak su vsetky slovenske adresy na uzemi Slovenska a hranicu Slovenska mame v OSM spravne, tak asi nie je potrebny. Ja len aby sme tie adresy mali vsade konzistentne. Ak Dodka presvedcite aby to negeneroval, nemam ... commented 2025-08-19 15:20:47 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170587849 (Comments: 1) | RhinoJeep (Discussed changesets: 1) | for meadow restoration consider using the `closed:highway` lifecycle prefix and/or tagging access=no. the old trail will show up on satellite and gps heatmaps for many years and often get mapped as new trails again and again when they are deleted. |
| 170637090 (Comments: 1) | Keith Helbley (Discussed changesets: 12) | hi! the trail updates look to be a bit further off than the current Strava heatmap + 3DEP LiDAR data implies. was there an issue on the ground with the existing path? satellite is often misaligned around this part of the park --- ... commented 2025-08-19 15:16:04 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦107 |
| 170009913 (Comments: 3) | Przemek_Bo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your many edits in this area! commented 2025-08-19 15:07:19 UTC by セコイア ♦2 |
| 15189682 (Comments: 1) | rewelator (Discussed changesets: 3) | ta droga nadal jest planowana? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105480434/history commented 2025-08-19 15:02:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170644099 (Comments: 3) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Siguiendo el tema de Belén, en el SII por ejemplo dice incorrectamente "Huelén", que puede ser una confusión o un nombre original que ya no se usa. También hay otros fundos que en el sii aparecen como "reser... commented 2025-08-19 15:02:22 UTC by James2813 ♦10 |
| 170674816 (Comments: 1) | Freszy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-08-19 15:01:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 23953198 (Comments: 1) | Perimex (Discussed changesets: 86) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291344242/history - czy to są jakieś realne plany? kiedy to powstanie? commented 2025-08-19 14:55:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 24178281 (Comments: 1) | gormur (Discussed changesets: 73) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291344242/history - czy to są jakieś realne plany? kiedy to powstanie? commented 2025-08-19 14:55:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 65468602 (Comments: 1) | MrWebber (Discussed changesets: 60) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291344242/history - czy to są jakieś realne plany? commented 2025-08-19 14:55:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 165267908 (Comments: 1) | Geoinfo3BI (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hej hej, habt ihr mal eure Straßenmeisterei dort hingeschickt? Denn vor Ort IST ein ganz offizielles Straßennamenschild commented 2025-08-19 14:53:57 UTC by DeFra85 ♦239 |
| 154699200 (Comments: 1) | NT Formby paths (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why are there two Asparagus Trail relations commented 2025-08-19 14:52:56 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,382 |
| 170661883 (Comments: 3) | Meow56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes indeed, webhallen's been replaced by inet commented 2025-08-19 14:52:14 UTC by Meow56 ♦1 |
| 169923323 (Comments: 3) | jieff6_10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | je vois que vous avez procédé au changement il y a 8 jours, merci beaucoup :-) commented 2025-08-19 14:47:14 UTC by jieff6_10 ♦1 |
| 170671345 (Comments: 2) | dino_dos_morangos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, bem reparado, pensei que tinha alterado uma área feita por mim, obrigado pelo reparo e boas contribuiçoes! commented 2025-08-19 14:40:36 UTC by dino_dos_morangos ♦1 |
| 170513068 (Comments: 1) | PiaVespRoll (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-19 14:40:11 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
 | 170570981 (Comments: 1) | JMGonk (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-19 14:26:47 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170653112 (Comments: 3) | hqs-plus (Discussed changesets: 9) | Der Bunker an den Koordinaten ist offen und leer. commented 2025-08-19 14:25:46 UTC by hqs-plus ♦29 |
| 170559231 (Comments: 1) | Andreas Kohout (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-19 14:25:39 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170606864 (Comments: 1) | Yiyi (itwikipedia) (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-19 14:20:14 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170673201 (Comments: 1) | Fiorentina (Discussed changesets: 14) | A korábban lekommunikálásra került BicApp alkalmazás érdekében a pilisben kapott még néhány szakasz bb365 tag-et a könnyebb visszakereshetőség érdekében, d... commented 2025-08-19 14:18:45 UTC by Fiorentina ♦3 |
| 170670622 (Comments: 3) | harrer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die Abschnitte sind noch nicht so lange in der Datenbank und sie wurden mit "access=no" (also quasi "gesperrt") aufgenommen ohne Fahrräder wieder explizit frei zu geben. Dies passiert grad. Du kannst dir die Abschnitte... commented 2025-08-19 14:18:39 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,520 |
| 170520838 (Comments: 4) | ffunk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, klar das ist möglich und auch geplant. Im Zuge von Aus- und Fortbildung sowie anlässlich der Erstellung von Einsatzkonzepten. Da wir jedoch rein ehrenamtlich organisiert sind war es wichtig zunächst Daten überhaupt im Feld ... commented 2025-08-19 14:11:15 UTC by ffunk ♦1 |
| 170669389 (Comments: 1) | 刘克清 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ, as-salāmu ʿalaykum, 👋😳 Good, --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170669389 commented 2025-08-19 14:11:02 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170671992 (Comments: 2) | joyclem (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thank you :) commented 2025-08-19 14:08:37 UTC by joyclem ♦13 |
| 170440813 (Comments: 1) | Andrijana14 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Andrijana14 Ich habe bemerkt, dass du in Fribourg auf den Gleisen 4/5 und 2/3 einige Footways hinzugefügt hast. Diese Footways sind leider nicht physikalisch : Sie verbinden den unteren Teil einer Treppe mit der Plattform eine Etage h&o... commented 2025-08-19 14:06:33 UTC by rokas_osm ♦8 |
| 170670192 (Comments: 1) | Siard (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alle begin is moeilijk .. Ik heb de paden en serviceroad weer losgemaakt van de landuse. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170670192 Editor iD heeft de neiging alles aan elkaar te plakken. De linker alttoets gebruiken tijde... commented 2025-08-19 14:01:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170283788 (Comments: 2) | Map_Team (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thierry Charlès merci de répondre aux messages 😉 https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=21628249 commented 2025-08-19 14:01:27 UTC by pyrog ♦356 |
| 170663617 (Comments: 2) | Stephen Michael Griffiths (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The highways were ok before your modifications which disconnected several highways, resulting in the warnings given above. It might be best to revert this changeset. Need help please just ask. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-08-19 14:00:58 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,894 |
| 170624372 (Comments: 1) | SPanthou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, D'après le cadastre ce chemin est publique. Je revert ce changement. Cordialement, Nicolas commented 2025-08-19 14:00:26 UTC by r2d ♦34 |
| 170616992 (Comments: 2) | wwwit (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dzięki. Poprawiłem commented 2025-08-19 13:47:37 UTC by wwwit ♦5 |
| 143234759 (Comments: 3) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 288) | I think I'm starting to understand it now. What a convoluted mess. Thanks for explaining commented 2025-08-19 13:46:44 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169108703 (Comments: 5) | Rawmance (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tasaisella ykkönen vaatii jotain painon vaihtoa etu ja takarenkaan välillä. Jos pystyy ajamaan satulassa ilman painonvaihtoa niin se kielii nollista. Luomulla voi paikoin joutua nousemaan polkemaan ylämäkeen mutta se liittyy ... commented 2025-08-19 13:45:35 UTC by Rawmance ♦2 |
| 170618124 (Comments: 2) | CoryS89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I see, I have set the roads to access=private. Thank you for your help. :) commented 2025-08-19 13:40:24 UTC by CoryS89 ♦2 |
| 170332964 (Comments: 27) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Dito. :-) commented 2025-08-19 13:40:21 UTC by North14 ♦9 |
| 170664935 (Comments: 3) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 127) | The Mapnik icon does look more Britishly appropriate, now that I've seen it. commented 2025-08-19 13:31:26 UTC by Pink Duck ♦155 |
| 170384875 (Comments: 4) | Mauro78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Si ho fatto le ho risistemate tutte una ad una. commented 2025-08-19 13:28:21 UTC by Mauro78 ♦1 |
| 169674285 (Comments: 3) | Herbal90 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Közben átállítottam az accesst erre a szakaszra is egy másik szerkesztéssel, nemsokára látszódnia kellene majd a csempéken is. commented 2025-08-19 13:24:35 UTC by Herbal90 ♦2 |
| 170667876 (Comments: 1) | AueCees (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Tip Probeer het gebied waar je iets aanpast wat kleiner te houden. Bij de supermarkt en het tankstation heb je nog oud... commented 2025-08-19 13:19:52 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170665895 (Comments: 1) | StereoSanctity (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 13:16:50 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170660321 (Comments: 1) | Wout van Koot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Beste Wout.. Gebouwen worden precies ingemeten geïmporteerd. Via het forum kun je om een update vragen. Op grond van een schuingenomen luchtfoto kun je geen gebouwen uitlijnen.... en nooit naar de daken kijken. Ik heb de gebouwen opnieuw ... commented 2025-08-19 13:15:55 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 169215892 (Comments: 3) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 7) | C'est un vrai bravo, mais oui il y a un problème ou plutôt une suggestion d'amélioration : c'est juste un bout du ruisseau. Pour concaténer les bouts il faut une relation. Sur iD : en bas de ton chemin ... commented 2025-08-19 13:15:12 UTC by trial ♦894 |
| 170659937 (Comments: 1) | Wout van Koot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 13:10:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170656151 (Comments: 1) | JanVanHoofddorp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 13:08:10 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170658878 (Comments: 1) | jdh009 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 13:07:05 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 169055978 (Comments: 1) | wazabi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Det ser ut som det er to stier oppå hverandre her. Den ene har du gitt mtb:scale=1+ (som blir blå, men antyder "vanskelig blå"), mens den andre stien ikke har noen mtb:scale. det er lurt å rydde litt opp for &ari... commented 2025-08-19 13:06:03 UTC by anderfo ♦117 |
| 164357969 (Comments: 2) | Philippe Vogel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oui, commented 2025-08-19 13:04:24 UTC by Philippe Vogel ♦1 |
| 170669617 (Comments: 1) | Carlos Brys (Discussed changesets: 45) | Pasé el número de la calle a la etiqueta alt_name=Calle 57 para respetar las convenciones de los nombres de las vías de circulación commented 2025-08-19 13:04:07 UTC by Carlos Brys ♦273 |
| 170271320 (Comments: 6) | PdxKicker (Discussed changesets: 3) | I am using mobile and didn't know if the comment went through or not. Sorry for multiple messages. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271320 ... commented 2025-08-19 12:57:17 UTC by PdxKicker ♦3 |
| 169320498 (Comments: 2) | itamas80 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Szia! Fényképeim vannak, amin látszik a metró nyomvonala. Ezen kívül a mertos.hu oldalon lévő adatokkal is próbálom összehozni, a vágánytengely-távolság |
| 170668906 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 382) | Löst https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4918160 commented 2025-08-19 12:49:31 UTC by habi ♦1,869 |
| 167460562 (Comments: 1) | Karenjg (Discussed changesets: 2) | These roads were mapped in 2020 as service driveway kind. Why did you change them to residential, for what is a cemetery surfaced access route? commented 2025-08-19 12:42:55 UTC by Pink Duck ♦155 |
| 170648922 (Comments: 1) | KimN Pfister (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Kim Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. So wie du hier die Öffnungszeiten angepasst hast (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170648922), ist d... commented 2025-08-19 12:42:46 UTC by habi ♦1,869 |
| 170637378 (Comments: 1) | MaperDave (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, nie je nutné vytvárať aj bod, aj do plochy pridať, že sa jedná o pizzériu. Každý má iný preferovaný spôsob, ale použitie oboch naraz nie je správne. Ja uprednos... commented 2025-08-19 12:28:42 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170666118 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 144) | Fixed in changeset 170667491 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170667491 commented 2025-08-19 12:24:15 UTC by TinPetreković ♦110 |
| 170619959 (Comments: 1) | zemcoj (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdravím, názvy už boli na jednotlivých reláciách. Nie je nutné ich pridávať aj na jednotlivé čiary. commented 2025-08-19 12:23:58 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170651921 (Comments: 1) | kacper112 (Discussed changesets: 17) | name=Zakład Pogrzebowy to raczej nazwa opisowa i powinna zniknąć. Nazwę w name można dać jeżeli się ją zna a to że to zakład pogrzebowy określają tagi. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13081285136 commented 2025-08-19 12:19:05 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦509 |
 | 169934217 (Comments: 4) | Ansderer (Discussed changesets: 12) | Yes, I believe Wikipedia can be used as a reference and source of truth, though information shouldn't be copied from it directly. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia commented 2025-08-19 12:17:38 UTC by dankarran ♦93 |
| 170557281 (Comments: 1) | editor0110 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo lieber editor0110, lass uns doch vor Ort mal treffen um diesen Weg zu Besichtigen wenn der tatsächlich da ist. commented 2025-08-19 12:17:13 UTC by Wildschutz ♦4 |
| 170644413 (Comments: 3) | James2813 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hola James. Hay varios errores en OSM y los estamos corrigiendo, Pero =farm es la etiqueta correcta. saludos commented 2025-08-19 12:15:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170618234 (Comments: 2) | Mohamed_Taha (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Patrik_B, Thank you for your message and the clarification about the custom imagery. My edit was to fix the crossing roads validation errors that you left after your edits, not to overwrite your updates. You can check my edits and your ed... commented 2025-08-19 12:05:28 UTC by Mohamed_Taha ♦14 |
| 170665120 (Comments: 1) | Geoworldconsult (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. We welcome you as a new mapper. We cannot expect that a new mapper maps everything in according to the requirements. Here I show you where your mappings are not in line with the mapping standards.... commented 2025-08-19 12:01:56 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170639532 (Comments: 1) | Sebastiansso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao e benvenuto su OSM! Ho avuto modo di revisionare questo tuo changeset ed ho notato che hai inserito o modificato dei dati che, a parer mio, potrebbero essere più chiari e completi se discussi, in particolare quelli dell'ospeda... commented 2025-08-19 11:57:14 UTC by EneaSuper ♦460 |
| 170664459 (Comments: 1) | k2101 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13081635708 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-08-19 11:41:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170663720 (Comments: 2) | GR-menneke (Discussed changesets: 35) | Neen, dit kan zeker niet, maar TW Geel is met het bestuur van stad Geel bezig om structuur trage wegen in overleg met aangelande te verplaatsen. commented 2025-08-19 11:33:19 UTC by GR-menneke ♦27 |
| 162726774 (Comments: 2) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, Stretch Longfellow! My name is Ravinder, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. I left one road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/660070833) with the driveway tag because it was already mapped as a driveway. I added th... commented 2025-08-19 11:21:23 UTC by rsitoni_Lyft ♦4 |
| 170462117 (Comments: 1) | Mstarseed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Mstarseed! Could you please provide information about the source of your mapping activity? I've noticed that some of your edits are hard to verify, and I’d like to know which source you used. --- ... commented 2025-08-19 11:13:46 UTC by Jurygr ♦2 |
| 170612909 (Comments: 5) | sharp gift (Discussed changesets: 5) | It's there now. I've separated the shop tags from the building tags and created two areas for Aldi and M&S. The area of the M&S matches roughly the press release count of 12000 sq ft (1115 sq m); but the shape/location may be a bit... commented 2025-08-19 11:12:28 UTC by spiregrain ♦203 |
| 170625153 (Comments: 2) | silversurfer83 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Moin Ja. Hab ich beim Bearbeiten schon gesehen, dass hier die Wiesen und place=localities in unmögliche Relationen gepackt wurden, die es unglaublich aufwändig machen hier etwas zu bearbeiten, wie zB landuse von highways zu trennen. ... commented 2025-08-19 11:11:17 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,520 |
| 158885900 (Comments: 2) | Nuern (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wie alt ist das Luftbild? Das Gebäude steht dort. commented 2025-08-19 11:10:15 UTC by Nuern ♦1 |
| 170404459 (Comments: 1) | celinathome (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individual. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-19 11:04:41 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170410087 (Comments: 4) | VladaC (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sorry for a video link but I could not find anything better than this: https://youtu.be/YQvoLBhFR1I?si=FOwrBj_pR4789Pab I can supply a photo and a pictogram of the socket for wiki in about two weeks but not now. commented 2025-08-19 10:54:50 UTC by VladaC ♦36 |
| 164117508 (Comments: 11) | Wildschutz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, lieber woodpeck, lieber rempshaener. Gerne können wir uns vor Ort ein Bild davon machen. commented 2025-08-19 10:50:28 UTC by Wildschutz ♦4 |
| 170154044 (Comments: 1) | kasztelan111 (Discussed changesets: 104) | Są jakieś plany budowy tych ulic czy to nazwy nadane na zapas? commented 2025-08-19 10:46:22 UTC by theDM ♦117 |
| 170604829 (Comments: 5) | Jakaka2222 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ik heb ivm navigatie nog 2 knooppunten 06 toegevoegd. Met name, die bij de zuidelijke afslag is belangrijk, zonder dit knooppunt zal een routeplanner voor een route 07-06-10, je eerst naar de zuidelijke 06 sturen en dan pas naar 10. Maar ook de... commented 2025-08-19 10:39:39 UTC by dvdhoven ♦936 |
| 170404548 (Comments: 1) | Oriejella (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. Please do not include the shadow of a building into your mapping. Best regards commented 2025-08-19 10:38:12 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
 | 170325761 (Comments: 2) | dy24 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Izmaiņas atcēlu - ceļa nepareiza pārklasifikācija. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170325761 commented 2025-08-19 10:37:51 UTC by Pilsetkartetajs ♦13 |
| 101380586 (Comments: 1) | gorozdos (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dakujem. Ak je to teda klub, treba aj pridat prislusne znacky, napr. club=sport, sport=canoe. Zadanie len nazvu na budovu nestaci, nedava to ziadnu informaciu o aky typ objektu ide. To co ste urobili je len nazov budovy, bez toho aby tam nejak... commented 2025-08-19 10:35:30 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,635 |
| 170624657 (Comments: 3) | heiclaud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Rückmeldung :) Nu sieht's plausibler aus. Happy mapping commented 2025-08-19 10:32:44 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,520 |
| 170641929 (Comments: 3) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bez iemesla vairākas reizes salauzta pareizi iezīmēta relācija. Izmaiņas atcēlu, kā to jau izdarīja cits kartētājs iepriekš. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2025-08-19 10:30:43 UTC by Pilsetkartetajs ♦13 |
| 170658425 (Comments: 1) | KonradGSD (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-19 10:23:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170657697 (Comments: 2) | maciekjg (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-19 10:23:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170172503 (Comments: 1) | od@KA30AG41 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Du hast in diesem Changeset auch Wegweiser zugefügt. Mindestens einer davon, an dem ich auch vorbeigeradelt bin, ist eigentlich ein route_marker und für Fahrräder. Da sollte also noch bicycle=yes dazu. Bei dem einen habe ich e... commented 2025-08-19 10:20:12 UTC by nurdafur ♦228 |
| 170600548 (Comments: 1) | mustwinelite (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=35867&type=part&key=13 commented 2025-08-19 10:16:35 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170509160 (Comments: 9) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 148) | in terms of next steps, I would suggest writing a detailed proposal based on the advice here: https://osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines so that the issues above can be discussed in detail commented 2025-08-19 10:14:56 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦392 |
| 170655939 (Comments: 1) | emmattttttt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Heya, thanks for your contributions to Kendal recently. Adding hundreds of buildings which are wonky and not split correctly (semis/terraces) is not actually that helpful for the map, as someone will have to come along and split them up and square th... commented 2025-08-19 10:14:54 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 93316305 (Comments: 2) | Radbubi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo, das war in der Tat ein Versehen, der Plätz hätte von mir eigentlich gar nicht bearbeitet werden sollen, da ich ihn gar nicht kenne. Daher kann ich auch nicht sagen, ob der aktuelle Tag besser ist oder der aus Version #1. Gr&uum... commented 2025-08-19 10:08:47 UTC by Radbubi ♦14 |
| 170660440 (Comments: 1) | robbie_morrison (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, prior name was "TA" not "HA" as logged. commented 2025-08-19 10:08:37 UTC by robbie_morrison ♦2 |
| 170638951 (Comments: 3) | 0x7700e6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Actually, just found out this can be applied to a majority of buildings with 90 degree corners. My edits looks so much better now, thank you. commented 2025-08-19 10:06:52 UTC by 0x7700e6 ♦1 |
| 170591917 (Comments: 3) | marksnso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо, исправил commented 2025-08-19 10:05:30 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,033 |
| 145147102 (Comments: 2) | anne_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello, Merci pour ta vigilance et ta proposition d'ajout sur le wiki :) Nous utilisons ce tag chez geovelo régulièrement dans les cas où il y a plusieurs paramètres présents : présence d... commented 2025-08-19 09:50:53 UTC by anne_geovelo ♦21 |
| 170659733 (Comments: 1) | pfhllnts (Discussed changesets: 18) | @bxlforever Please review and express your opinion on moving the tram stop a bit southwest commented 2025-08-19 09:48:26 UTC by pfhllnts ♦17 |
| 127374929 (Comments: 1) | Zizozu (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, " - Lycée Dupuy-de-Lôme" dans les noms n'a pas lieu d'être, le CDI c'est le CDI, il est situé dans le lycée, lycée nommé par ailleurs. commented 2025-08-19 09:46:20 UTC by trial ♦894 |
| 169870611 (Comments: 2) | h0rr0rrdrag0n (Discussed changesets: 3) | Спасибо за правку! Да, UUID был не тот — я взял его из списка своих загруженных фото, а оказывается надо было из URL для фото с общей карты (н... commented 2025-08-19 09:38:41 UTC by h0rr0rrdrag0n ♦11 |
| 170657172 (Comments: 1) | rampenbestrijding (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag rampenbestrijding. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-19 09:26:36 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 155406971 (Comments: 1) | Bruno1460 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Bonjour, est-ce que l'itinéraire "Entre collines et Canal – Boucle de 20 Km" a un marquage sur le terrain ? je pose cette question car le passage de l'écluse semble compliqué. il y a par ex un u... commented 2025-08-19 09:26:18 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,270 |
| 170623219 (Comments: 5) | fabil7h (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin @rempshaener! Ich habe mir die verlinkten Artikel und weitere Quellen durchgelesen. Das hatte ich vorher leider übersehen. Der „name“ ist nun bereinigt (siehe Changeset 170658251). Falls es noch weiteres gi... commented 2025-08-19 09:25:45 UTC by fabil7h ♦1 |
| X | 170638215 (Comments: 1) | Mario Endrigo ramos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Mario Endrigo ramos, it looks like there is something wrong with your Organic Maps app, it created hundreds of empty changesets in recent days. Could you please try to reset the local map editing storage in the app by typing "... commented 2025-08-19 09:14:16 UTC by map per ♦1,306 |
| 170640942 (Comments: 1) | kOSMofant (Discussed changesets: 21) | Dag kOSMofant, Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed en de manier waarop ook. Dit is wel een heel korte periode. Beetje op het randje. Voor een week zou ik het zelf niet afsluiten met conditional-tagging. Er zijn immers routers die dan ... commented 2025-08-19 09:07:29 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170377199 (Comments: 8) | buy_osmand (Discussed changesets: 53) | You three have truly disrupted my appetite to eat. I shall cool off and not return for the longest while again for the second time .. such a heart wrenching experience to give your time and energy to mapping your own nation's map.. I've cau... commented 2025-08-19 09:00:34 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170505416 (Comments: 4) | Mikhail Kuzin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pascal We've reworked the split algorithm a bit, made it more like ID. And I've edited the neighboring intersection. Could you take a look at this changeset in terms of the correctness of saving history and other things. I&... commented 2025-08-19 08:56:48 UTC by Mikhail Kuzin ♦2 |
| 166447313 (Comments: 1) | matsumi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Приветствую! Пожалуйста, не проставляйте этажи у домов по каким-то косвенным признакам, как тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104013586/history Там вся... commented 2025-08-19 08:53:16 UTC by basilisk ♦17 |
| 157506875 (Comments: 1) | LeFourbe (Discussed changesets: 2) | You could have kept old_name=Géant Casino or was:brand=Géant Casino as it ma be still known under the old name. commented 2025-08-19 08:48:42 UTC by trial ♦894 |
| 170574021 (Comments: 3) | noenoenoe123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je peux te confirmer que ce Géant Casinon est devenu Carrefour, et donc je maintiens que c'est le noeud osm.org/node/11868781870 qui est à mettre à jour (et ton nouveau noeud à supprimer). Voir https://actu.fr/bre... commented 2025-08-19 08:43:16 UTC by trial ♦894 |
 | 170590862 (Comments: 1) | ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI, Thank you for your contribution to improving the road network on OpenStreetMap. I noticed in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170590862 That you changed some roads to “operational&... commented 2025-08-19 08:38:57 UTC by salma_z ♦18 |
| 170654414 (Comments: 1) | Pierre Guillou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci ! commented 2025-08-19 08:37:02 UTC by trial ♦894 |
| 170653408 (Comments: 4) | ralrei (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry, Test war mir nicht aufgefallen. Sah nach Vandalismus oder einem Versehen aus. Ist mir aber neu, dass man zu Testzwecken falsche Daten in die offizielle Karte zeichnet. commented 2025-08-19 08:33:05 UTC by ralrei ♦21 |
| 170655238 (Comments: 1) | johnmama (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-19 08:24:20 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170646267 (Comments: 1) | JanFi (Discussed changesets: 50) | Merci Jan, ik stond net op het punt om hetzelfde te doen! commented 2025-08-19 08:14:57 UTC by Ruben Van de Velde ♦33 |
| 170646122 (Comments: 1) | Eli gh se g a egg co hey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes with https://www.osm.org/changeset/170654970 commented 2025-08-19 08:12:08 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 30457804 (Comments: 1) | FreedSky (Discussed changesets: 57) | Is there really a ferry here? commented 2025-08-19 08:11:35 UTC by rene78 ♦452 |
| 170645271 (Comments: 1) | FrozenTomb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! You can also add the gate (as a node on the street) with the key barrier. For Details see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:barrier commented 2025-08-19 08:08:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170603904 (Comments: 6) | basilisk (Discussed changesets: 3) | Моя вина: в арку я и не заглянул. Просто глянул, что на месте кафешка, а должен был быть веломагазин. Чаще же просто на одной площади тупо м... commented 2025-08-19 08:02:52 UTC by basilisk ♦17 |
| 169153695 (Comments: 1) | lorisobi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sind die Wasserpumpen Trinkwasser? Bzw. nur wenn explizit "kein Trinkwasser" dran steht, ist es keins (in Deutschland besteht Kennzeichnungspflicht) Habe letztens jemanden mit Wohnmobil und Gießkanne davor parken gesehen, obwoh... commented 2025-08-19 08:00:39 UTC by sembelst134 ♦4 |
| 170523784 (Comments: 4) | diodaix (Discussed changesets: 5) | Of course! We can use kodewilayah.id as source, it's free for use commented 2025-08-19 07:55:08 UTC by diodaix ♦7 |
| 156017582 (Comments: 1) | NaSH (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312438862#map=19/45.634253/-1.037902 you are using landuse=gravel, but also you are using surface=gravel. Please note that landuse=gravel is not a recognised value according to the wiki. ... commented 2025-08-19 07:46:25 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 163901795 (Comments: 2) | AnatoleFrance (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour Matthieu, Merci beaucoup pour votre retour. Cela fait maintenant quelques mois que je suis sur OSM mais je suis toujours en apprentissage du bon fonctionnement de cet outil et je suis donc à l'écoute de tous les reto... commented 2025-08-19 07:41:08 UTC by AnatoleFrance ♦7 |
| 169768799 (Comments: 1) | _lele_ (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ciao. Benvenuto nella mappa più bella del mondo. Ma anche quella che ha regole travisate e scombinate di continuo... Vedo che gai aggiunto i valori di default su alcune highway. Se non sai cos'è un default, ti invito a leg... commented 2025-08-19 07:36:15 UTC by Jrachi ♦775 |
| 170495743 (Comments: 1) | domeqasz (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zmieniłem lokalizację przystanku na faktyczną: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170652928 commented 2025-08-19 07:35:10 UTC by SzymonH ♦210 |
| 97305341 (Comments: 1) | LängengradLuigi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Servus, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28222103 bei dem weg ist dir ein Fehler reingerutscht, beide Seiten "cycleway:left=no" (und rechts) :D Ich habs mal geändert. commented 2025-08-19 07:24:17 UTC by Negreheb ♦277 |
| 170648375 (Comments: 1) | silverbullet (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, was genau "testest" du hier? Denke bitte auch daran, einen Punkt als Dezimaltrenner zu verwenden, kein Komma. Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen :) David commented 2025-08-19 07:23:58 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 125205245 (Comments: 5) | taketaketake (Discussed changesets: 36) | 付け加えると、誰かによって県道が全て結合されていたため交差点部で分離をしました。 その時にはmaxspeed = 40;50がすでに書き込まれていました。 私が新規でmaxspeedを記入したと勘... commented 2025-08-19 07:21:24 UTC by taketaketake ♦17 |
| 170649461 (Comments: 1) | Pebbi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OSM :) Was ist das für ein Gelände? Ein Themepark (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=theme%20park?uselang=de) ist es sicherlich nicht. Ich helfe dir gern, da ein passendes Tagging zu f... commented 2025-08-19 07:21:19 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170650581 (Comments: 1) | YouMePhoto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, die Adresse ist nicht korrekt eingetragen, bitte korrigieren Viele Grüße David https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:* commented 2025-08-19 07:18:49 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170647054 (Comments: 1) | person33333333333123333333333333333333123333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! If you have any information about why the bridge is closed and how long it will remain closed, it would be helpful to leave a note (key note). commented 2025-08-19 07:18:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170651169 (Comments: 1) | Niemandin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Niemandin, willkommen bei OSM :) kannst du dir die Position nochmal genau anschauen? Das Cafe liegt doch sicher nicht auf dem Fußweg oder im Grünstreifen sondern eher im Gebäude? Viele Grüße un... commented 2025-08-19 07:16:35 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170651406 (Comments: 1) | Nomis101 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Nomis101, willkommen bei OSM :) cool dass du dir so viel Arbeit machst mit dem Eintragen der Firmen hier. Bitte beachte aber, dass Namen in OSM nicht abgekürzt werden sollten, siehe Wiki [1]. Abgekürzte Namen können ü... commented 2025-08-19 07:14:20 UTC by dadavid ♦495 |
| 170651097 (Comments: 1) | ernie77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello and welcome to editing! Typically when updating companies with multiple locations, name is just the name and branch is supposed be spesific location. So name=McDonald's and branch=Mäntsälä for example commented 2025-08-19 06:48:13 UTC by thautal ♦39 |
| 170573309 (Comments: 1) | Sergey Fedorov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Anyone knows why the ladder is not rendered on the map? commented 2025-08-19 06:41:47 UTC by Sergey Fedorov ♦1 |
| 170181499 (Comments: 1) | user_16522352 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Please discuss with others before adding back these names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170649572 commented 2025-08-19 06:39:22 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,581 |
| 170623300 (Comments: 3) | Kratom1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170635905 commented 2025-08-19 06:15:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 164100980 (Comments: 1) | Emdier (Discussed changesets: 6) | 您好, 不建议使用 name 表示楼号, 而建议用 ref 或 addr:housenumber. 也不建议写入通名(座, 号楼). commented 2025-08-19 06:12:01 UTC by YPGGUUY ♦30 |
| 170622326 (Comments: 3) | dvdhoven (Discussed changesets: 240) | eggie, bedankt voor de correcties commented 2025-08-19 06:09:24 UTC by dvdhoven ♦936 |
| 170404947 (Comments: 4) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Vdaka za opravu 👏 commented 2025-08-19 06:02:12 UTC by t_ja ♦209 |
| 170647487 (Comments: 1) | agrifolia (Discussed changesets: 5) | Really solid additions and data updates here — thank you for your efforts at editing OSM! commented 2025-08-19 05:46:51 UTC by stevea ♦309 |
| 170043727 (Comments: 3) | almirku (Discussed changesets: 3) | ок commented 2025-08-19 05:26:38 UTC by Uralla ♦61 |
| 170632388 (Comments: 4) | burrscurr (Discussed changesets: 25) | For context, I changed two things: - Changed type=was:route to type=route (because the route seems to still be active) - Removed the sections in Dresden because, according to the Flixbus website, the bus only stops in Rostock, Dessau, Halle... commented 2025-08-19 05:24:16 UTC by burrscurr ♦81 |
| 164176556 (Comments: 4) | 7tonin (Discussed changesets: 10) | Voici le complément et le développement de cette expérience. Comme c'est la 189ème contribution du fil, voici le lien direct : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/rendu-de-carte-et-mise-en-danger/36419/189 commented 2025-08-19 05:23:13 UTC by 7tonin ♦16 |
 | 170636034 (Comments: 1) | amedranovich (Discussed changesets: 5) | hola, quizá no quedó bien entendido porque no debemos usar edificios de casas en áreas de terrenos. son dos cosas distintas. seguramente estás pensando, pero no "veo" los terrenos en el mapa y necesito ver... commented 2025-08-19 05:12:29 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,584 |
| 170583637 (Comments: 3) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 175) | Currently, there are 483 occurrences ref:bgt:id and your 49 bgt_id. commented 2025-08-19 05:05:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170545199 (Comments: 1) | tassiewatch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Output for chargers has its own tagging rather than adding it into the "name". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=charge_point commented 2025-08-19 04:45:16 UTC by tastrax ♦1,155 |
| 170409650 (Comments: 1) | Le_Sharkoïste (Discussed changesets: 35) | 😳👍Good, --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170409650 commented 2025-08-19 04:38:27 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170637903 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 16) | ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ, as-salāmu ʿalaykum, i've intention to mark this changeset as good on OsmCha but was notified," resource not found" https://osmcha.org/changesets/170637903 so, here it go... commented 2025-08-19 04:05:48 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170490601 (Comments: 1) | Austin2000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for making these fixes, and my condolences if you were impacted by the flooding. I went ahead and fixed the road connectivity for the Big Sandy/Round Mouintain intersection, but I have a couple questions if you're on the ground in this ar... commented 2025-08-19 03:06:47 UTC by citrula ♦896 |
| 151579591 (Comments: 1) | AaronFitz (Discussed changesets: 11) | This changeset was reverted due to presence of NO TRESPASSING sign https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170645170 commented 2025-08-19 01:36:11 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦566 |
| 164657683 (Comments: 1) | Laraemily22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Por favor, não altere o mapa com tags inválidas. Revertido. commented 2025-08-19 01:24:05 UTC by smaprs ♦380 |
| 170614182 (Comments: 4) | W Craig Coffman (Discussed changesets: 3) | I was more making light that no reasonable or prudent cyclist would ride on a narrow bridge sidewalk in the first place, but while we're at it... Oklahoma law under §47-11-1202 defines bicycles as a vehicle, and Oklahoma City Code 32-578 pr... commented 2025-08-19 00:32:21 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,150 |
| 170601778 (Comments: 1) | GmTax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, you've added this onto the building as a whole. I've reverted it, if you wish to add your business, please add it as a node within the bounds of the building. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-08-19 00:29:57 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,259 |
| 170558297 (Comments: 3) | W Craig Coffman (Discussed changesets: 3) | OK, you might want to doublecheck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755367124 commented 2025-08-19 00:27:35 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,150 |
| 170606602 (Comments: 3) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 256) | jak to jest rewert czegoś to warto podać czego commented 2025-08-19 00:22:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170607746 (Comments: 17) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 114) | Jak się miesza różne zmiany a opisuje tylko jedne - to nie ma co się oburzac że ktoś chciał wycofać opisaną a załapały się inne ale z http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=170606602 można zerknąć zresztą, wid... commented 2025-08-19 00:22:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170477930 (Comments: 3) | Aikonhill (Discussed changesets: 17) | Roads and paths should not be deleted, as they will lose their history. In a very rare event where a road or path needs to be deleted – rather than edited – please don't delete it without adding the new one, as this is live da... commented 2025-08-18 23:48:40 UTC by MorahT ♦24 |
| 169770443 (Comments: 1) | JspMB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gràcies per la teva contribució. És millor no esborrar el local i dexar-lo buit amb shop=vacant. Així es conserva l'històric del local. Es podria esborrar si el local desapareix, com p.e. desapareix l&... commented 2025-08-18 23:47:48 UTC by Jose Luis Infante ♦475 |
| 170461199 (Comments: 1) | Maradona11 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi, Do you know if you can exit the centre via https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13070375209 ? From the aerial imagery it looks like you should be able to walk out to the car park. Thanks. commented 2025-08-18 23:12:23 UTC by TheSwavu ♦556 |
| 160459080 (Comments: 1) | Sasank Chaganti (Discussed changesets: 5) | You've marked these crossings as not having tactile paving, although it's abundantly clear from the aerial imagery that it is present (it's buff blister paving, used at uncontrolled crossings in the UK). Recording this data accu... commented 2025-08-18 23:02:50 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 160476640 (Comments: 1) | Sasank Chaganti (Discussed changesets: 5) | Don't add non-existent fords, or blindly accept the first suggestion which makes editor warnings go away. It's unlikely that Princess Street would ford the River Medlock, not least because of the ~5 metre difference in height between the ro... commented 2025-08-18 22:58:17 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 169176045 (Comments: 1) | bob1984 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Haha oops xD Love it. commented 2025-08-18 22:55:42 UTC by TheBox193 ♦1 |
| 163962068 (Comments: 1) | Superbee980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Teil-Revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170642771 , siehe auch Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4676656 commented 2025-08-18 22:48:53 UTC by rohieb ♦110 |
| 160489535 (Comments: 2) | Sasank Chaganti (Discussed changesets: 5) | Now fixed, with the footway split and tagged as a bridge, which is what you should have done had you need prioritised hiding an editor warning over actually trying to get it right. commented 2025-08-18 22:48:21 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 168938996 (Comments: 1) | F10sh (Discussed changesets: 13) | This was discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4822816 (and I'd love to see more source=* tags in changesets 😉) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source commented 2025-08-18 22:33:13 UTC by rohieb ♦110 |
| 170578923 (Comments: 3) | rimeraz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Thanks for reply. There are what I would describe as cycle barriers on either end of the path. That is two fences that overlap but with a large gap for a person to pass. I would interpret the barriers as discouraging the path but not bloc... commented 2025-08-18 22:07:37 UTC by kitsee ♦100 |
| 170575237 (Comments: 2) | Anaximandre (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2920857542/history/2 commented 2025-08-18 22:00:40 UTC by MatthieuMartin ♦93 |
| 170611131 (Comments: 1) | mein-albtrauf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo mein-albtrauf! Schön, dass du hier bei OpenStreetMap mitmachst! Herzlich willkommen, auch wenn du schon länger mitmachst, aber bisher hat noch niemand einen deiner Änderungssätze kommentiert, wenn ich es richtig sehe.... commented 2025-08-18 21:56:25 UTC by Metzor ♦379 |
 | 124228011 (Comments: 1) | Itzik Arzoni (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Itzik Arzoni, Thank you for your contribution to OSM. In this adit you have added a "foot=no" tag to road 66 from Megiddo to Megiddo junction. What is the source of this tagging/ Is there a road sign that says so? |
| 164862259 (Comments: 1) | Dindia (Discussed changesets: 11) | Removing the foot=no tag is acceptable only if there is no road sign on the ground that prohibits pedestrians. Otherwise, this edit goes against the fundamental principles of good practice. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_prac... commented 2025-08-18 21:38:38 UTC by zstadler ♦1,064 |
| 154091489 (Comments: 2) | memories_den_rob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hii, Good question. I found the names in an physical map inside the bicycle renting shop that I couldn't find online. If you have better information feel free to update OSM. Thanks, Rob commented 2025-08-18 21:32:30 UTC by memories_den_rob ♦3 |
| 170636155 (Comments: 2) | WiFox (Discussed changesets: 3) | Widzę, że poprzednie opisy też masz bogate. Znajdę błąd i poleci wszystko z takim samym szacunkiem jakim darzysz innych. commented 2025-08-18 21:21:52 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦509 |
| 169773248 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 451) | To jest automatyczny komentarz, dodany przez bota, który sprawdza edycje. Ktoś przed tobą zrobił babola. Już poprawione. commented 2025-08-18 21:10:09 UTC by olo81 ♦682 |
| 170576656 (Comments: 3) | Sebastiaan (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is not relevant for mountain scrambling routes which have little to no trail visibility. Completely removing the original source information makes it very difficult to trace back the source of the data, which can be very helpful in many circumst... commented 2025-08-18 21:02:33 UTC by brendan714 ♦12 |
| 170135467 (Comments: 3) | C2oc4 (Discussed changesets: 451) | Zostawiłeś landuse=commercial co nie jest prawdą. commented 2025-08-18 20:54:40 UTC by olo81 ♦682 |
| 170638388 (Comments: 1) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 114) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-08-18 20:34:14 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170083320 (Comments: 2) | on_thebus009 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My bad, must have been a mouse slip. commented 2025-08-18 20:31:47 UTC by on_thebus009 ♦1 |
| 158945429 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Będę uważał. Pozdrawiam. commented 2025-08-18 20:28:22 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 158590457 (Comments: 1) | T_Tim01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pourquoi changer le numéro de rue ? Sur le site il est au 11 et non au 9. Le bâtiment n'a pas non plus de nom, c'est le nom du club. Et le numéro d'adresse se met usuellement non sur le bâtiment mais &ag... commented 2025-08-18 20:21:41 UTC by trial ♦894 |
| 170638766 (Comments: 1) | evgenykatyshev (Discussed changesets: 62) | My bad. I finally found a photo with waterfall here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170638962 commented 2025-08-18 20:18:25 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦167 |
| 159321843 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Przepraszam, że odpowiadam tak późno. Bardzo dziękuję za informacje. Adres firmy znalazłem w internecie na stronie firmy i prawdopodobnie, bezmyślnie skopiowałem. Faktycznie w Sosenkach-Jajkach nie ma nazwanych ulic. commented 2025-08-18 20:16:40 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 170636942 (Comments: 1) | Rijk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Rijk, Je vraagt feedback. Wanneer er geen pad meer is kan het uiteraard weg. Paden die nog herkenbaar zijn op luchtfoto's taggen weg meestal als disused:highway=path . Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-18 20:14:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170623206 (Comments: 2) | jengelh (Discussed changesets: 138) | Es bräuchte auf einer Strecke mit durchgehendem Wendeverbot zwei Restrictions pro Way. Das ist ziemlich idiotisch. Und Wege werden gerne in kleine Happen geteilt, weil sich irgendein surface=, sidewalk=, maxspeed= oder turn:lanes-Wert jede paar... commented 2025-08-18 20:14:55 UTC by jengelh ♦121 |
| 160076050 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dziękuję za informację. Postaram się. :-) commented 2025-08-18 20:06:27 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 160146113 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Dziękuję za konstruktywną uwagę i informację. :-) commented 2025-08-18 20:04:56 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 169767886 (Comments: 2) | DPD- (Discussed changesets: 1) | A discapito del nome, non si tratta di una piazza, bensì del cortile dell'adiacente oratorio (Oratorio San GIovanni Paolo II). Tuttavia il nome completo è "Piazza degli AnimaSogni". Ho inserito il numero civico in quanto ... commented 2025-08-18 20:04:16 UTC by DPD- ♦1 |
| 164896946 (Comments: 2) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Drogi Kocie :-) Sprawdzę. Z reguły opieram się na zdjęciach i cieniowaniu WMS. commented 2025-08-18 20:02:14 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
| 167495071 (Comments: 3) | Res Saca (Discussed changesets: 12) | Często na zdjęciach lotniczych np. drogi są w niektórych odcinkach niewidoczne. Ponad drogi lesne na cieniowaniu WMS są słabo widoczne. Czasami rysuję, zwłaszcza przebiegi dróg leśnych, jako wypadkowa informacji ze zdjęć, cien... commented 2025-08-18 19:57:50 UTC by Res Saca ♦6 |
 | 170616172 (Comments: 1) | Macst (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Macst, "Odos" (ΟΔΟΣ, οδος in Greek) means "street", so it doesn't need to be added to the street name. Also, int_name should be updated. I've mapped the same... commented 2025-08-18 19:54:57 UTC by sm4rk0 ♦5 |
| 170638082 (Comments: 1) | Tom van Dijk (Discussed changesets: 15) | Heeft every door wel een beetje bijzonder getagt. Nou ja... commented 2025-08-18 19:52:44 UTC by Tom van Dijk ♦28 |
| 170601199 (Comments: 1) | ToffeHoff (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi ToffeHoff, you added an atm here with an unusual operator: operator=Your Is this maybe a typo and you meant operator=YourCash? Regards, lyctkel commented 2025-08-18 19:38:38 UTC by lyctkel ♦336 |
| 170628758 (Comments: 3) | Frimmer (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi Jrachi, Thank you for your remark! It was right on spot. Have already corrected the dataset. Attila commented 2025-08-18 19:32:45 UTC by Frimmer ♦9 |
| 170637309 (Comments: 1) | Taya Snijder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted Berlin name vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170637380 commented 2025-08-18 19:31:13 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 168243686 (Comments: 5) | Kielwanderer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, verstehe. Dadurch, dass du nur den Parkplatz-Tag (amenity=parking) entfernt hast, geht aus den Daten aktuell nicht hervor, was der aktuelle Status dieser Fläche ist. Ist der Parkplatz aktuell noch in Betrieb? Ist er gesperrt abe noch da? Ist... commented 2025-08-18 19:30:48 UTC by Discostu36 ♦210 |
| 129328720 (Comments: 4) | webfil (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dans le SIG de la Ville de La Tuque, le chemin de Parent (route 25 ou R0461) est en effet de classe 1, mais c'est aussi vrai pour le chemin R0806 (qui relie la R1009 à Senneterre), la R0403 (route 1) de Rivière-aux-Rats à so... commented 2025-08-18 19:26:38 UTC by webfil ♦35 |
| 170511817 (Comments: 3) | Amul (Discussed changesets: 11) | Done! You are welcome! commented 2025-08-18 19:18:09 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170636679 (Comments: 1) | Frederik Ramm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted Berlin name vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170636809 commented 2025-08-18 19:13:47 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170620947 (Comments: 2) | DataFoxOSM23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die 'Cycleroute 85-86 habe ich geändert. Jetzt ist oneway:bicycle=yes kein Ploblem. https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18.0/51.7388/3.8452 Gr eggie commented 2025-08-18 19:13:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170561297 (Comments: 1) | pplaymoo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola pplaymoo, gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap. Con respecto a este área https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385139034#map=18/41.631053/-4.775249 tal vez no sepas que no se admite publicidad en OSM. https://wiki.open... commented 2025-08-18 19:08:40 UTC by MarinoBM ♦99 |
| 170626421 (Comments: 1) | SalvadorBiedma (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ya estaba en el mapa. commented 2025-08-18 18:55:07 UTC by dcapillae ♦371 |
| 170630637 (Comments: 1) | MonsterSnowGoon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci de rajouter des données ferroviaires dans osm. Il ne faut pas utiliser `railway=junction` pour tous les points désignés sauf s'il s'agit réellement d'une jonction ferroviaire. Voir http... commented 2025-08-18 18:54:09 UTC by wolfy1339 ♦25 |
| 170615262 (Comments: 1) | heywhatsthat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/12573156333 more than 100 meters. Please check the position. commented 2025-08-18 18:52:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 168683750 (Comments: 3) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Salve McCio, Le regole per la definizione delle caratteristiche degli edifici 3d le trovi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building Per ragruppare le parti di un edifici... commented 2025-08-18 18:52:01 UTC by Map47 ♦39 |
| 170582992 (Comments: 2) | gnlpfth (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hi, die betroffenen Wege sind korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis! commented 2025-08-18 18:49:17 UTC by gnlpfth ♦74 |
| 170621960 (Comments: 7) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-18 18:48:22 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170614202 (Comments: 4) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-18 18:48:03 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170626415 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-18 18:46:50 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170568475 (Comments: 3) | Jooniebug (Discussed changesets: 1) | Done! You are welcome! commented 2025-08-18 18:45:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170622529 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-18 18:44:06 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170540325 (Comments: 1) | Jules117 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding it to the street instead of as separate geometry! I've been doing a lot of this sort of clean-up lately. Please spread the word! commented 2025-08-18 18:16:53 UTC by BPTT ♦87 |
| 170266479 (Comments: 1) | Sebastiaan (Discussed changesets: 3) | It is not appropriate to grade Canadian climbing routes with UIAA grades. We have no idea what UIAA grades or SAC scale grades mean. In Canada we use the Yosemite Decimal System (YDS) for grading. Rating this as UIAA grade 4 will likely be co... commented 2025-08-18 18:10:08 UTC by brendan714 ♦12 |
| 170610588 (Comments: 2) | espressocapital (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170634025 commented 2025-08-18 18:06:46 UTC by iandees ♦729 |
| 170610678 (Comments: 2) | espressocapital (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170634025 commented 2025-08-18 18:06:46 UTC by iandees ♦729 |
| 170577167 (Comments: 4) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 861) | Re 2) The same is true for the definition of a trunk in many countries. That means, a "highway:motorway" tag might be a too narrow scope. I suggest to put this up for discussion in the (global, not US) forums, get some feedback, adap... commented 2025-08-18 17:59:51 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 162667874 (Comments: 2) | LAZACARTO (Discussed changesets: 4) | OK Ok je vous laisse juge de mes contributions, et le plaisir de les corriger ou preciser si vous le souhaitez. Amicalement commented 2025-08-18 17:41:58 UTC by LAZACARTO ♦4 |
| 170373906 (Comments: 3) | AdrienHegy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merci pour l'explication, en effet je n'avais pas remarqué ce cas de la "double section simple" entre deux Z. C'est un joli dilemme, d'un côté des relations plus compliquées pour une informa... commented 2025-08-18 17:27:09 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦151 |
| 170623109 (Comments: 1) | Kratom1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I guess this is #spam and should be reverted? commented 2025-08-18 17:19:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 168993587 (Comments: 3) | Quixlian (Discussed changesets: 15) | La fuente que citas (https://www.sct.gob.mx/carreteras/direccion-general-de-servicios-tecnicos/datos-viales/2024/), no indica directamente dónde inicia, solo dice que inicia en México (km 0.0) el siguiente punto T. C. México - Cu... commented 2025-08-18 17:18:25 UTC by ferog_v ♦22 |
| 169255333 (Comments: 4) | moloko67 (Discussed changesets: 5) | hallo kre777, vielen Dank, das werde ich dann entsprechend ändern. Beste Grüße Frank commented 2025-08-18 17:07:31 UTC by moloko67 ♦5 |
| 170406548 (Comments: 1) | Annabel Elizabeth (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi Annabel, well done, it's clear to me that you are begining to grasp the concept of correcting a footpritn's position when mapping using imagery captured at an angle. There are a few inaccuracies in this changeset I have mapped these foot... commented 2025-08-18 16:27:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 162097178 (Comments: 6) | mr:spock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Erledigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170626086 commented 2025-08-18 16:25:41 UTC by Hb- ♦303 |
| 169639640 (Comments: 4) | borticus (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Redprintblueprint interesting, thanks for the tip! If you would like, feel free to add it to the map - I'm currently focusing on Flock Safety cameras in my mapping quest, trying to decide how wide I want to cast my net but driving around makes ... commented 2025-08-18 16:24:07 UTC by borticus ♦1 |
| 170132758 (Comments: 4) | ZeLonewolf (Discussed changesets: 148) | 27.7 ft off commented 2025-08-18 16:18:19 UTC by TheNightRider ♦26 |
| 170621003 (Comments: 1) | freemapsman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcj... commented 2025-08-18 16:13:37 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170614844 (Comments: 1) | jacek roslonek (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-18 16:13:35 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170623368 (Comments: 1) | Jagsz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-18 16:13:32 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170589661 (Comments: 1) | Noha307 (Discussed changesets: 4) | nice details! commented 2025-08-18 16:12:18 UTC by Hans Thompson ♦109 |
| 170603439 (Comments: 1) | Zh9567 (Discussed changesets: 70) | Hi Zh9567, I think a 'hamlet' is a place with just a few houses. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12879284819 is definitely a village. Bye Rene commented 2025-08-18 16:04:38 UTC by rene78 ♦452 |
| 170501575 (Comments: 6) | JoaoPaixao (Discussed changesets: 6) | Entretanto reparei que criste um objecto coicidente com o edifício da igreja e apagaste o edifício que já existia. Referia-me a colocar o place_of_amenity no mesmo edificio da igreja (building=church) commented 2025-08-18 16:03:35 UTC by luisforte ♦132 |
| 170624893 (Comments: 1) | SOSOwner (Discussed changesets: 10) | ...because: https://stephensonsofessex.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/48/2025/08/23-TT-31-8-25.pdf commented 2025-08-18 15:53:10 UTC by SOSOwner ♦10 |
| 170534590 (Comments: 3) | W Craig Coffman (Discussed changesets: 3) | I see that it shows 8th as a bridge as you say & gives me credit for the change. Not sure how I managed that (not intentional). Clearly it is not. commented 2025-08-18 15:44:38 UTC by W Craig Coffman ♦3 |
| 161559392 (Comments: 1) | LivingWithDragons (Discussed changesets: 40) | In this changeset, you added shop=vacant to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9190174887 but left it tagged with healthcare=vaccination_centre . Has the Vaccination Centre closed? If so, the healthcare=* and related tags should be removed. commented 2025-08-18 15:43:41 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦283 |
| 136750939 (Comments: 2) | OrcaDan (Discussed changesets: 20) | That was a data entry error. Thank you for finding it and making the correction. commented 2025-08-18 15:32:24 UTC by OrcaDan ♦14 |
| 169906065 (Comments: 1) | Atanas Angelov (Discussed changesets: 15) | These are not busways. Look at the wiki. Stop vandalising the OSM database. commented 2025-08-18 15:22:16 UTC by DaveF ♦1,572 |
| 170577202 (Comments: 1) | torus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo torus, steht da an den Gebäuden aber wirklich "Ehemaliger ..." dran? Ich hätte vermutlich einfach eher das `old_name` zu `name` geändert und `historic=yes` impliziert ja gewissermaßen etwas "Ehemaliges" commented 2025-08-18 15:21:56 UTC by Harald Hartmann ♦829 |
 | 170619270 (Comments: 1) | Shadidaraa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170622520 commented 2025-08-18 15:06:39 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169995833 (Comments: 8) | johnysvo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Domluvené `description` jsem revertnul do předchozích stavů: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170620828 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170621449 commented 2025-08-18 14:52:59 UTC by zby-cz ♦13 |
| 159576975 (Comments: 3) | Mister Kanister (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ok, thanks! commented 2025-08-18 14:52:21 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,783 |
| 170621449 (Comments: 1) | zby-cz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revertované descriptions - dle domluvy v diskusi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169995833 Dva changesety - minulý - odebírá nově přidané `description` https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170... commented 2025-08-18 14:51:24 UTC by zby-cz ♦13 |
| 170620828 (Comments: 1) | zby-cz (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revertované descriptions - dle domluvy v diskusi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169995833 Dva changesety - tento - odebírá nově přidané `description` - následující - revertuje h... commented 2025-08-18 14:50:55 UTC by zby-cz ♦13 |
| 170621085 (Comments: 1) | Shadidaraa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted political vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170621265 commented 2025-08-18 14:43:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 164805516 (Comments: 1) | angys (Discussed changesets: 104) | Hi angys, I noticed you added a ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376686817) in Malaysia. OSM guidelines suggest ferry routes start and end at an amenity=ferry_terminal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). In ... commented 2025-08-18 14:39:44 UTC by aaronq227 ♦11 |
| 170350614 (Comments: 3) | Valenting01 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Oh okay, merci ! :) (Cela dit, comme me l'a fait remarqué @GeorgeKaplan, ça fait peut-être un peu doublon d'avoir deux "public_transport=platform", donc si ça te va je peux adapter les points en "... commented 2025-08-18 14:38:48 UTC by rezemika ♦10 |
 | 169885303 (Comments: 2) | ChristianB77 (Discussed changesets: 11) | also, I'd suggest preserving the ways with tags like 'was:bridge=yes' (and probably check_date=dd/mm/yy) - otherwise it's hard to find the info in the history and, since those bridges are visible on the satellite images, someone m... commented 2025-08-18 14:33:28 UTC by one_half_3544 ♦45 |
| 167547424 (Comments: 2) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello, Please read the comment in your changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170588620 commented 2025-08-18 14:27:57 UTC by MassCartog ♦139 |
 | 170299862 (Comments: 2) | Kayo_33 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi! Thanks for reviewing! I thought I did add the building outline, but alas. Updated in changeset #170620147 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170620147) commented 2025-08-18 14:24:10 UTC by Kayo_33 ♦14 |
 | 170046326 (Comments: 3) | marktechratp (Discussed changesets: 4) | Avec plaisir. commented 2025-08-18 14:16:04 UTC by ilias_ ♦228 |
| 170405294 (Comments: 2) | GerritHoberg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Check this page for the corrections I made. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170618627 Best regards commented 2025-08-18 14:00:13 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
 | 170430528 (Comments: 4) | Hidden Mountain (Discussed changesets: 10) | Тоже почитал разного, понял, что расхождение оценки по этой шкале это нормально. Соглы, тогда тоже буду придерживаться таких же критерие... commented 2025-08-18 14:00:13 UTC by PiroOwl ♦7 |
| 170612920 (Comments: 2) | Dan4800 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dobrý den, děkuji za upozornění, příště doplním. commented 2025-08-18 13:57:48 UTC by Dan4800 ♦1 |
| 169970630 (Comments: 9) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 119) | Ja, so ist der "übliche" Weg. commented 2025-08-18 13:55:41 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 170618133 (Comments: 1) | JZ-POW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo. Je kunt een fietsenstalling ook als vlak mappen. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-18 13:49:41 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170616799 (Comments: 1) | JZ-POW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-18 13:37:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170600984 (Comments: 1) | AlexeyKass (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему вы сменили название улицы со "Светлая улица" на "Светлая"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/wa... commented 2025-08-18 13:37:09 UTC by mavl ♦76,098 |
| 170616470 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 15) | I have create a website on car parking multiplayer mod apk. It's very easy and good game for any player. If you are interested this game so click on this link https://cpmodezone.com/ and download here for PC and IOs commented 2025-08-18 13:36:53 UTC by tabishali ♦1 |
| X | 170569059 (Comments: 1) | Mor000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-18 13:30:52 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦119 |
| X | 170566615 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 861) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-18 13:30:44 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦119 |
 | 170561067 (Comments: 1) | Zebl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps t... commented 2025-08-18 13:30:24 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦119 |
| 96423761 (Comments: 1) | Martin Witte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Martin, ist zwar schon 4 Jahre her, aber kannst du mir eventuell sagen, um was für ein Denkmaö es sich hier handelt? Und befindet es sich wirklich *in* dem Gebäude? commented 2025-08-18 13:27:28 UTC by wielandb ♦135 |
| 170594722 (Comments: 3) | BlueOceanCost (Discussed changesets: 1) | Se precisan fuentes para el barrio Ambientalista. ¿de donde sale ese nombre? commented 2025-08-18 13:26:24 UTC by muralito ♦2,047 |
| 170170983 (Comments: 4) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 118) | Keine Ursache. Ich freue mich über qualifizierte Nachfragen, weil ich ja doch auch immer mal etwas übersehe. commented 2025-08-18 13:25:39 UTC by Scout Jens ♦279 |
| 170405310 (Comments: 1) | kscx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You often include the shadow next to a building in your mapping. These are no part of a building. Keep that in mind at next mappings. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-18 13:23:23 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170616213 (Comments: 1) | Shadidaraa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi I have reverted this changeset since it broke a lot of boundaries and created wrong entities. Please, be more careful while editing the map. Happy mapping! commented 2025-08-18 13:18:00 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦205 |
| 170605415 (Comments: 1) | zemcoj (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdravím, používajte lepšie komentáre k sadám zmien. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn commented 2025-08-18 13:17:42 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170604338 (Comments: 1) | zemcoj (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdravím, meno cyklotrasy sa dáva len na reláciu cyklotrasy, nie aj na jej členov. commented 2025-08-18 13:16:34 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170535349 (Comments: 1) | martinrepicky (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravím, mtb trasy sa do máp pridávajú pomocou relácií. commented 2025-08-18 13:13:55 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170404181 (Comments: 1) | sal d (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I reviewed your work here as well. Also, many duplicated buildings. Check the bottom line of IDeditor for a message in blue telling how much hidden features there are. Zoom in further to see the buildings Best regards commented 2025-08-18 13:10:52 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170567177 (Comments: 1) | TomasCasnocha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravím, čo má daný bod reprezentovať? commented 2025-08-18 13:04:38 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170570992 (Comments: 1) | Radovan Semancik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please use this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nudisminstead of name tag. commented 2025-08-18 13:01:41 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170498380 (Comments: 2) | dsaldias (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, si Esam Latam es el grupo corporativo actualmente adquirio UPI la Universidad Politecnica Internacional e ISPI el Instituto Superior Politecnico Internacional La paginal web de esam latam es: https://esamlatam.com/ Categoria d... commented 2025-08-18 13:00:57 UTC by dsaldias ♦2 |
| 170406151 (Comments: 1) | sal d (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. I am afraid that you have a bad start. Sorry to say, but your mappings are not as what we might expect. Issues : building nodes connected to each other. Buildings not squared. Many buildings are duplicated (... commented 2025-08-18 12:54:39 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170498286 (Comments: 2) | dsaldias (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, si la UPI es Universida Politecnica Internacional, IPI ni idea que es :) commented 2025-08-18 12:52:54 UTC by dsaldias ♦2 |
| 170605895 (Comments: 4) | Thorsky24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh, thanks for the information and for your help! Will make some extra modifications, then to explicitly allow it. I see the rules seem to differ for the Netherlands, but since the territory is so close to the border, I guess explicitly stating it�... commented 2025-08-18 12:52:46 UTC by Thorsky24 ♦1 |
| 164216585 (Comments: 3) | Pfefferdose (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170614902 where the changeset comment was: "Revert changesets 164216585 and 162577298 due to copyright violation. The user did not respond to questions asked via changes... commented 2025-08-18 12:41:48 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,323 |
| 162577298 (Comments: 1) | Pfefferdose (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170614902 where the changeset comment was: "Revert changesets 164216585 and 162577298 due to copyright violation. The user did not respond to questions asked via changes... commented 2025-08-18 12:41:39 UTC by Nakaner-repair ♦8,323 |
| 168005667 (Comments: 5) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | Tak, będzie otagowany ogólnie jako commercial całego terenu. commented 2025-08-18 12:38:38 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,289 |
| 168005981 (Comments: 6) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | Ponownie się pytam o źródło zakazu. Nie, wizyta nie jest źródłem takiego zakazu. Dla jasności - ja tez tam byłem i otagowałem wg tego, co zobaczyłem. commented 2025-08-18 12:34:36 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,289 |
| 62617564 (Comments: 3) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 108) | OK. Ich bin da erst gewesen und die Fontänen waren nicht in Betrieb. So kamen mir die eingetragenen Punkte willkürlich vor. Nicht böse sein. War nur eine Frage. Grüßle, Jens commented 2025-08-18 12:33:52 UTC by Scout Jens ♦279 |
| 168005780 (Comments: 6) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | A jaka była podstawa do wykreślenia granic tego obszaru? Bo ja tam też byłem i granic nie ma, a do tego jestem na 95% pewien, że obszar wyrysowany nie obejmuje całości Straży Miejskiej. commented 2025-08-18 12:33:23 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,289 |
| 170607113 (Comments: 1) | FrancoisCott (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋😳 commented 2025-08-18 12:33:09 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170397510 (Comments: 4) | jemily1 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Genial! El caso es que, la calle situada al sur de la Plaza del ATS Juan Pamblanco sale marcada como 'Desconocida', pero también me sale marcada cuando busco la Calle de las Fiestas Populares y Tradicionales. Pero tiene sentido lo qu... commented 2025-08-18 12:33:03 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,653 |
| 170612428 (Comments: 1) | Duimstok (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-18 12:27:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170607539 (Comments: 3) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 40) | I understand the issue. However, in the Montreal region and in Quebec in general, we put access tags for new edits and older highways will be updated too as time goes by. commented 2025-08-18 12:25:05 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦377 |
| 170607274 (Comments: 2) | yelisey90 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Yup, and this is described by sidewalk=no tagging. A (theoretical) router may be set to ignore roads with such tagging. But otherwise, people are free to walk on the rightmost lane of the road, keeping close to the side. commented 2025-08-18 12:24:50 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170407938 (Comments: 1) | mkms25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for mapping. I am sorry to say, but these mappings need to be improved. Clustered buildings need to be split into individual buildings. Buildings which does not meet their footprint need to be adjusted. Best regards and keep mappin... commented 2025-08-18 12:24:19 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 131071966 (Comments: 1) | Stephan van Helden (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, ich bin bei Editierarbeiten im Bereich Loch (Hollfeld) auf eine nicht attributierte Linie (way 1129175009) gestoßen, die du im Rahmen dieses CS erstellt hast. Ich vermute, die umschlossene Fläche sollte Teil einer NSG-Relation (Wiesent... commented 2025-08-18 12:21:51 UTC by Halfix ♦24 |
| 168857693 (Comments: 1) | [at]AJYTO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Penutupan jalan setelah stasiun cimekar. Akses hanya untuk penduduk yang kenal kenal aja. 🙄 commented 2025-08-18 12:12:06 UTC by [at]AJYTO ♦5 |
| 170566213 (Comments: 2) | Peats00r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi Eggie, Thanx! Ik ga er eens naar kijken. Ik heb behalve dit restaurant nog verder niets gewijzigd. Ik woon daar in de buurt en wist da het recent is veranderd van eigenaar. En via de sessie op WHY2025 maar op het idee gekomen om dit direct... commented 2025-08-18 12:09:02 UTC by Peats00r ♦1 |
| 168357814 (Comments: 1) | SteveinKY (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Steve - unfortunately this edit broke the boundary of Louisville. I was able to fix it, so no action required. The iD (web-based) editor will not warn when a boundary relation is malformed, and so you shouldn't use it for boundary work. commented 2025-08-18 12:07:49 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦566 |
| 163441105 (Comments: 5) | Shohreh (Discussed changesets: 44) | Oui, je vois qu’ils ont été ajouté environ une heure après mon message. commented 2025-08-18 12:05:06 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦8 |
| 169888986 (Comments: 6) | Антон-1983 (Discussed changesets: 51) | А по поводу бел. мовы в name по правилам надо писать именно на ней названия. Тут на карте ещё вроде работает какой-то автоматический перевод... commented 2025-08-18 12:04:51 UTC by HantDX ♦16 |
| 170612705 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 382) | Knotenpunkte der Garagen hatten auch addr:*-Tags commented 2025-08-18 11:58:45 UTC by habi ♦1,869 |
| 170256948 (Comments: 3) | Kiharu1410 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah thanks commented 2025-08-18 11:56:12 UTC by Tewuzij ♦17 |
| 170521635 (Comments: 5) | Ma_sza (Discussed changesets: 1) | got it! commented 2025-08-18 11:46:00 UTC by Ma_sza ♦1 |
| 170602533 (Comments: 1) | HansjMr (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi HansjMr, can you please add proper roles to a relation members of the administration boundaries that you are editing in this area (inner- outer) commented 2025-08-18 11:44:53 UTC by Aleksandar Matejevic ♦205 |
| 170608116 (Comments: 4) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 256) | Chciałem wiedzieć z ciekawości, bo domów nie wywalałem. I tak wywaliłeś moje zmiany wtedy. Ja sprawdzam drogi też na Ortofotomapie, a jak są nadane adresy na danej ulicy, to takich ulic nie wywalam. commented 2025-08-18 11:30:40 UTC by theDM ♦117 |
| 170609971 (Comments: 1) | Kochbunker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-08-18 11:21:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170609334 (Comments: 1) | emmattttttt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hiya, did you know you can press the ‘Q’ key when a building is selected, to automatically make its corners square? It can help with drawing accurate building outlines. :) commented 2025-08-18 11:16:09 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 167982611 (Comments: 2) | Антон-1983 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ок. Удалил дубликат. Оставил правильное место commented 2025-08-18 11:00:31 UTC by Антон-1983 ♦33 |
 | 170488383 (Comments: 1) | Rekan_20 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-08-18 10:57:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170504338 (Comments: 1) | Yildirim33 (Discussed changesets: 18) | fa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments Please read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2025-08-18 10:56:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 165203493 (Comments: 3) | vjethro (Discussed changesets: 2) | I was looking around on the new aerial layer. And asked myself, when forest, scrub, grassland, bare_rock, scree, blockfield. If this is tagged, why is that not tagged the same, it looks the same. So I more asked your opinion, because your are locally... commented 2025-08-18 10:53:14 UTC by Allroads ♦427 |
| 95813364 (Comments: 1) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 256) | Masz jakieś info czy ta pętla jest budowana czy to tylko propozycja? commented 2025-08-18 10:52:57 UTC by theDM ♦117 |
| 159672101 (Comments: 2) | Tymeker (Discussed changesets: 17) | Przepraszam, uwaga była po edycji, niemniej DB nie działa od... 2018 roku ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4841854# commented 2025-08-18 10:52:04 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,774 |
| 170516448 (Comments: 1) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 31) | Od 15 grudnia br. będą czynne, ale nie mogłem się już doczekać, więc ustawiłem je wcześniej ;) A stację we Wręczycy zaktualizowałem do dzisiejszego stanu commented 2025-08-18 10:51:24 UTC by RafaBoski ♦9 |
| 170434293 (Comments: 3) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Dezza, thank you very much for getting in touch. Since there isn't a designated entry/exit for the parking area, and the lack of a designated parking aisle with on-the-ground markings, I would say that it wasn't an ideal represe... commented 2025-08-18 10:45:15 UTC by Gorger ♦33 |
| 170268496 (Comments: 2) | ThomasSchweizer (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bedoeld was deze straat in Amsterdam. Naam verwijderd. commented 2025-08-18 10:44:39 UTC by jb54osm ♦181 |
| 170499710 (Comments: 1) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 43) | changeset 1000 commented 2025-08-18 10:44:30 UTC by Tomas09 ♦45 |
| 170608720 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 76) | Wg https://spl.pl/deklaracja-dostepnosci/ parking dla pacjentów jest przed ogrodzeniem, więc zgodnie z projektem studium parking za przychodnią jest najprawdopodobniej dla pracowników MON. commented 2025-08-18 10:36:29 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦199 |
| 170598456 (Comments: 1) | Yiyi (itwikipedia) (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a ci... commented 2025-08-18 10:29:35 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,897 |
| 170276891 (Comments: 3) | Mariusz 2M (Discussed changesets: 44) | Super, dzięki commented 2025-08-18 10:29:22 UTC by syntex ♦871 |
| 170293549 (Comments: 2) | indigomc (Discussed changesets: 30) | Morning, sorry about that. Thanks for putting it right. commented 2025-08-18 10:29:03 UTC by indigomc ♦189 |
| 170607472 (Comments: 2) | WinebyPaul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Verwijderd in changeset #170608013 commented 2025-08-18 10:18:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170598151 (Comments: 1) | gio_k5 (Discussed changesets: 0) | mostly reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170607815: the name is assigned to the main road, see https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal commented 2025-08-18 10:16:18 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170598255 (Comments: 1) | gio_k5 (Discussed changesets: 0) | reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170607815: the name is confirmed by https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal commented 2025-08-18 10:15:08 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170546651 (Comments: 1) | breno-au (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, I fixed the motor_vehicle:conditional on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075257284 However, you've got locked=yes which means the gate is "usually locked and not accessible without the key" and opening_hours = 24/7 whic... commented 2025-08-18 10:07:45 UTC by TheSwavu ♦556 |
| 170607316 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 76) | Dodatkowo zmieniłem przy Rokitnickiej w brownfield, gdyż jest oznaczony naocznie jako teren rozbiórki. commented 2025-08-18 10:04:46 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦199 |
| 170505885 (Comments: 1) | surprizpw (Discussed changesets: 1) | rv - there is nothing in laws or signs to prohibit walking on this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170607274 commented 2025-08-18 10:01:50 UTC by yelisey90 ♦160 |
| 170595581 (Comments: 4) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo Negreheb, stimme dir zu, die Erfassung ist zur Zeit ambivalent. Ich sehe nur viele Kartenapps, die die an Straßen-getaggten Sidewalk-Angaben nicht nutzen, während alle die separat erfassten abbilden. Ergo bin ich für eine separa... commented 2025-08-18 09:42:57 UTC by North14 ♦9 |
| 170565749 (Comments: 1) | siwangi02 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please be sure to direct the flow to the river on the east. Ad intermittent as well to the rivers. Best regards commented 2025-08-18 09:36:11 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 142749113 (Comments: 1) | Autopistero20502020 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hola Autopistero20502020: Gracias por tus aportaciones a OpenStreetMap. En las relaciones de ruta de carretera no deben incluirse los enlaces, tal como está recogido en la wiki. " Link roads (highway=*_link) from and to the route. S... commented 2025-08-18 09:31:34 UTC by MarinoBM ♦99 |
| 160489100 (Comments: 1) | Sasank Chaganti (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, I see you added crossings at the intersection of Princess Street and Charles Street as unmarked crossings. As they are obviously signal controlled crossings and marked, I was wondering why you chose to do this. The purpose of this task is suppose... commented 2025-08-18 09:26:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,558 |
| 164944948 (Comments: 2) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 166) | zou zo maar kunnen; ik pas het aan. commented 2025-08-18 09:21:45 UTC by Martin Borsje ♦749 |
| 170576226 (Comments: 1) | noelbov (Discussed changesets: 35) | You can't put the rue du Chapelain on a node with the (bidirectional) chaussée de Bruxelles, because (1) that's simply not where it is and (2) it would imply that you can turn left from the rue du Chapelain into the chaussée d... commented 2025-08-18 09:20:34 UTC by Vollis ♦16 |
| 170382137 (Comments: 2) | __yoshita__ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A few remarks. Please do not collect multiple buildings and tag it as 1 building. Square each rectangular building with the Q key. Solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your work. Bes... commented 2025-08-18 09:15:18 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170364549 (Comments: 1) | madhulikaJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your work. 3 waterway crossings had to be identified and mapped ! Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-18 09:15:07 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170587519 (Comments: 1) | Geoworldconsult (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while it is still selected. Don't ignore the warnings on the issue triangle, and solve them before uploading your mappings. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-18 09:13:49 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170570650 (Comments: 1) | Rubi Shrestha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not map wood areas. Not part of the project. Your view is limited to your task square, but the wood area covers a much bigger area. Not to be mapped in Ideditor, Now you mapped woodland areas within a ... commented 2025-08-18 09:04:32 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 160818923 (Comments: 2) | subham_lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Sharp gift! My name is Shubham and I’m mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. I didn’t notice the ponds earlier—sorry for that. Corrected the issue: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170603588. According to Lyft-owned aeri... commented 2025-08-18 08:59:28 UTC by subham_lyft ♦1 |
| 121992659 (Comments: 1) | Interswd (Discussed changesets: 99) | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4901570 ? commented 2025-08-18 08:58:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 141983019 (Comments: 2) | twz123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It is the office of a mobile home care service that is open to customers, e.g. for consultations. commented 2025-08-18 08:58:22 UTC by twz123 ♦4 |
| 170339892 (Comments: 3) | Tossal Redó (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aclaro varias cosas de este conjunto de cambios: - En el tramo de Camino de Borja que empieza por Avenida de Orihuela hasta Camino de la Alcoraya (en el punto en el que el camino gira a la derecha) hay placas con la denominación Calle ... commented 2025-08-18 08:55:33 UTC by jemily1 ♦65 |
| 170484999 (Comments: 4) | GrooveBox (Discussed changesets: 19) | No no, you've done nothing wrong. the NGED project stretches to the east coast and down to Cornwall as well. i'm just focusing on Wales to start with but this last grid has proven to me this process is still too manual and I need to automat... commented 2025-08-18 08:53:52 UTC by kitsee ♦100 |
| 170602537 (Comments: 2) | RobertTXL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adres mooring=yes hersteld https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=haven+oudeschild&objectId=0448020000000001&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=119371.9805198534&geometry.y=561956.88547742&zoomlevel=11.19... commented 2025-08-18 08:53:35 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170601473 (Comments: 1) | fobar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yep, it seems that it went through this time commented 2025-08-18 08:52:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170521720 (Comments: 1) | Temur Zoidze (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, please don't use the "name:XX" tags to add transliterations and duplicates of the name of a village in 195 (!) different languages. The tag should be used only if there is an actual name in this language. commented 2025-08-18 08:50:41 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 170603346 (Comments: 1) | wies1 (Discussed changesets: 126) | Fehler bei der Source Angabe Richtig: GWR Swisstopo 2ß25 commented 2025-08-18 08:46:17 UTC by wies1 ♦154 |
| 170587404 (Comments: 1) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo, die Tags an einem "charge_point" sollten keinen "charge_point"-Präfix haben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point Außerdem gibt es keinen "socket:ccs", das wir... commented 2025-08-18 08:44:40 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 170585915 (Comments: 1) | Lvcivs_Pavlvs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Mapuj w zakresie lokalnym, a nie tak jak tutaj po kilka domków wgłąb paru państw. Dodatkowo pisz normalne opisy zmian, zwłaszcza dla tak dużych obszarów: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian ... commented 2025-08-18 08:42:23 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦199 |
| 170602792 (Comments: 1) | schlesiener (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-08-18 08:41:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170326426 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 17) | Wat hersteld, maar het lijkt onbegonnen werk. natural=water heeft ook de tag waterway meegekregen en overal een wirwar. commented 2025-08-18 08:40:04 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170326706 (Comments: 1) | jasperelderhorst (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ben hier even bezig geweest om wat te herstellen, maar het is onbegonnen werk. eggie commented 2025-08-18 08:31:03 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 27567597 (Comments: 7) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 599) | I see what you mean but no one will find the memorial in OSM by typing Marian Bublewicz ... You can not expect from people in other country's to type Mariana Bublewicza commented 2025-08-18 08:26:51 UTC by Op'tRad ♦45 |
| 169615859 (Comments: 3) | Gernsheim_85 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Für diese Fahrzeuge sollte allerdings die Gewichtsbeschränkung auf 1.5t ausreichen. :) Vielleicht kannst du den Kollegen den Hinweis geben, dass sie in ihrem Navi/Routingprogramm das einfach entsprechend einstellen sollen, bzw. falls es nic... commented 2025-08-18 08:24:41 UTC by tyr_asd ♦441 |
| 170602059 (Comments: 1) | Kołodziej (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-08-18 08:20:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 158144399 (Comments: 1) | bao luo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Grazie bao luo! Ti segnalo alcune modifiche successive che ho fatto sperando di dare una mano: Forse il nome corretto è semplicemente "Casa dell'acqua" - ho quindi aggiornato per togliere il "- gratuito" ... commented 2025-08-18 08:02:55 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦27 |
| 170561704 (Comments: 1) | Mohammadreza Imanlou (Discussed changesets: 1) | سلام مسیرهای روی نقشه رو خراب کردید. لطفا با دقت ویرایش کنید. commented 2025-08-18 07:54:22 UTC by Hadi Omid ♦50 |
| 170600410 (Comments: 1) | LuanNT2k (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sản phẩm và dịch vụ chất lượng, uy tín commented 2025-08-18 07:40:41 UTC by LuanNT2k ♦1 |
| 170585258 (Comments: 2) | ItsEgo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, thank you! Just did this for the sake of time management, but will provide more information on the upcoming adds or changes. Best wishes! commented 2025-08-18 07:31:30 UTC by ItsEgo ♦1 |
| 4932469 (Comments: 2) | Malin (Discussed changesets: 6) | "Vážsky kanál" by mohlo byť skôr v loc_name ako alt_name, ale čo sa mňa týka, nedával by som to tam vôbec. commented 2025-08-18 07:30:02 UTC by Malin ♦5 |
| 12081212 (Comments: 1) | stargoose (Discussed changesets: 2) | Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 170461166 (Comments: 2) | Quixlian (Discussed changesets: 15) | 👋 commented 2025-08-18 07:25:27 UTC by Quixlian ♦18 |
| 170598960 (Comments: 1) | stargoose (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag stargoose. Al die accesstags zijn al default op een paaltje. Ik zal ze verwijderen. access=no en motor_vehicle=no geeft anders problemen. Het is immers een bromfietspad. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-18 07:24:51 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170593340 (Comments: 1) | Andrea Barbera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback BECIS stond al op de kaart. Ik heb één vermelding verwijderd. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Com... commented 2025-08-18 07:20:57 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170586850 (Comments: 1) | Scherpehuys (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Het is beter om de vermeldingen op de gebouwen te plaatsen. Een B@B wordt getagd met tourism=guest_house guest_house=bed_and_breakfast Ik zal de vermeldingen in ieder geval op het gebouw plaatsen. MVG egg... commented 2025-08-18 07:10:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170595836 (Comments: 1) | yer123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋😳 commented 2025-08-18 07:08:37 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 163965094 (Comments: 3) | Ryccardo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ho trovato le informazioni su https://www.ginabiancheria.com/it/contattaci e corretto l'elemento in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170598767 commented 2025-08-18 07:03:20 UTC by Danysan95 ♦117 |
| 170594679 (Comments: 1) | asoltys (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-18 06:58:01 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 170496742 (Comments: 4) | 12pjw34 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for clarifying. The combination of access=no and foot=yes makes sense here. access=yes was not explicitly provided for any of these originally, but perhaps the editor you're using marked it as such by default. commented 2025-08-18 06:57:52 UTC by Lumbercrack ♦3 |
| 170130231 (Comments: 3) | icluf (Discussed changesets: 7) | Super pour les photos, les miennes commencent à dater et je n'ai pas tout trouver à l'époque. Le schéma indique les lames, pas leur orientation par rapport au nord (on pourrait l'ajouter aussi mais &c... commented 2025-08-18 06:52:41 UTC by pyrog ♦356 |
| 170184034 (Comments: 1) | Vegpet (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - deletion of roads servicing other properties https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170598180 commented 2025-08-18 06:48:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 121494537 (Comments: 2) | Fraetech (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, 3GZB and 4GZB are the "names" of the mobile antennas installed for the "New Deal Mobile" program here in France. They mean 3G/4G "Zone Blanche". I used them about two - three years ago, but not since, because they... commented 2025-08-18 06:47:45 UTC by Fraetech ♦2 |
| 170591406 (Comments: 1) | Avery04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! You can divide the railway and add a life cycle prefix (my interpretation of pipped off) to the corrected part. Please visit our wiki at osm.wiki with a huge railway section. commented 2025-08-18 06:40:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170591546 (Comments: 1) | Avery04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13076859598. What is the mean of the tag "railway feature" = "Four Mile Run". Please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org with a huge railway section. commented 2025-08-18 06:35:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 112254046 (Comments: 3) | Geofreund1 (Discussed changesets: 141) | schon repariert Gruß Geofreund1 commented 2025-08-18 06:31:28 UTC by Geofreund1 ♦287 |
| 170592015 (Comments: 1) | Muhgellan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4335856113. You change the cuisine value from sandwich to mexican. Have you seen the shop, or is this just a correction based on general knowledge? In the first case, you can also delete... commented 2025-08-18 06:31:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170592265 (Comments: 1) | King Kongin1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your SPAM entry. commented 2025-08-18 06:25:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170592298 (Comments: 1) | King Kongin1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your SPAM entry. commented 2025-08-18 06:25:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170582972 (Comments: 2) | Tsu-Yi Su (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, Noted, thank you for the information. Please invalidate task and I will update accordingly. Thanks again! commented 2025-08-18 06:09:01 UTC by Tsu-Yi Su ♦6 |
| 169721948 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 256) | Dear mapperue, It was just noticed that you recently edited the city of Tatabánya in Hungary for its boundaries. With this changeset (osm.org/changeset/169721948), you accidentally (?) removed the routing attributes of several st... commented 2025-08-18 06:03:57 UTC by osminng ♦15 |
| 170584844 (Comments: 1) | Outdoorrookie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ja, alles dicht gemacht commented 2025-08-18 06:00:32 UTC by lionfish16 ♦1 |
| 170579361 (Comments: 1) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 170577804 (Comments: 1) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 170545217 (Comments: 1) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 170545194 (Comments: 3) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 170545203 (Comments: 1) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 170545275 (Comments: 2) | Bigoton2025 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283 commented 2025-08-18 05:59:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
 | 170334827 (Comments: 3) | silasjelley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great! Thank you for quick response and valuable contributions! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170334827 commented 2025-08-18 05:47:57 UTC by aq123 ♦16 |
| 170327904 (Comments: 2) | yaswanth_d (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi phoenixsaigon1698, Thank you for your message and for highlighting the time-based restriction. However, the time-based restriction is not configured as per the OSM wiki guideline. I made the correction. Please feel free to check. commented 2025-08-18 05:44:30 UTC by yaswanth_d ♦2 |
| 170519616 (Comments: 4) | René1966 (Discussed changesets: 1) | A67-A67 - dank je wel en excuus voor de verwarring commented 2025-08-18 05:44:17 UTC by René1966 ♦1 |
| 170589937 (Comments: 1) | Dr Centerline (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello. In this changeset you appeared to have added the tag building=house to relations 10322762, 12037189, and 2807121, which are train routes between Chicago and New York. I don't think that makes sense so I have deleted those tags in changes... commented 2025-08-18 05:42:23 UTC by jhuang97 ♦12 |
| 170584600 (Comments: 1) | Durifon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut et bienvenue sur OSM ! J'ai bien vu ta contribution et je te propose de l'améliorer. En général on évite d'utiliser la clé `name` pour y coller une description de l'éléme... commented 2025-08-18 05:33:44 UTC by Lejun ♦489 |
| 170592297 (Comments: 1) | GrabSG_SyazwanM (Discussed changesets: 2) | 😳👍 Good, --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170592297 commented 2025-08-18 05:26:42 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 170587458 (Comments: 2) | aryal231105 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170595078 commented 2025-08-18 05:16:38 UTC by mariotomo ♦1,899 |
| 170564945 (Comments: 1) | agaligher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you post a link to the imagery you are using? Your fairway seems a little bit problematic and wildly crosses bunkers (according to more standard sat imagery). Thanks. commented 2025-08-18 04:52:30 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170593529 (Comments: 2) | GrabSG_SyazwanM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Public correction on the presumption paragraph 2: "Thereby, requiring their paid corporate persons to thoroughly apply `restriction=no_u_turn` relations on >> every road intersection <<. Please do feel free to correct my statement.&q... commented 2025-08-18 04:44:45 UTC by buy_osmand ♦110 |
| 169955043 (Comments: 1) | hoanganh2911 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Rất cám ơn bạn đã edit và contribute cho OSM VN. Tuy nhiên để cho việc record và kiểm tra dữ liệu được tốt hơn bạn hãy ghi chú chi tiết hơn những thay đổi đã th... commented 2025-08-18 03:59:27 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170477013 (Comments: 1) | tuanpb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Rất cám ơn bạn đã chỉnh sửa vài changeset đầu tiên cho OSM VN. Bạn hãy vào profile của mình để xem qua hoặc học chỉnh sửa OSM trên learnosm.org nhé. commented 2025-08-18 03:54:30 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170557031 (Comments: 1) | Ngô Đình Hoàng (Discussed changesets: 2) | Rất cảm ơn và trân trọng những đóng góp của bạn cho dữ liệu OSM VN nhưng hãy giúp cộng đồng thêm một bước nữa bằng cách mô tả chi tiết những gì ... commented 2025-08-18 03:45:27 UTC by phoenixsaigon1698 ♦246 |
| 170588620 (Comments: 1) | ANDREW_K_IN_MA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thanks for leaving a changeset comment. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists... commented 2025-08-18 02:33:54 UTC by MassCartog ♦139 |
| 169614535 (Comments: 3) | Konfarter (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1. brak konkretnych planów w tej materii, co więcej, niedawno RK uzyskał odpowiedź od MI że takie plany nie istnieją, UMWM chciałoby obsługiwać ale samo remontować nie zamierza (https://www.rynek-kolejowy.pl/wiadomosci/mi-bez-konkretn... commented 2025-08-18 01:10:58 UTC by kstdz ♦6 |
| 170183099 (Comments: 4) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 18) | I occasionally check with https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=146.08876&lat=-37.13979&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_node... commented 2025-08-18 01:09:20 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,670 |
| 170568939 (Comments: 1) | Simgames (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170590899 Unsinnige opening_hours, internet_access=wlan wo kein öffentlicher Internetzugang verfügbar ist. Außerdem bitte keine Edits über halb Europa ausbreiten. commented 2025-08-18 00:52:19 UTC by Bienson ♦309 |
| 170542929 (Comments: 1) | spencerguo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Instead of mulch, I think surface=woodchips is the standard tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface. Looks good otherwise commented 2025-08-17 23:56:55 UTC by ion_chi ♦29 |
| 170563313 (Comments: 2) | iSenpaiHN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, it is called "Express Coin Laundry" commented 2025-08-17 23:53:13 UTC by iSenpaiHN ♦1 |
| 170423113 (Comments: 3) | Nostradumbass (Discussed changesets: 3) | Might have been an accident, I made a lot of edits to the marina in the last few days and it seems to have slipped through. I plan on visiting the marina again soonish and surveying & verifying all the dispensers/benches/tables/etc, so I might no... commented 2025-08-17 22:57:15 UTC by Nostradumbass ♦2 |
| 170552234 (Comments: 1) | Johann-Nikolaus Andreae (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hiya, this post box is a duplicate of one which is already mapped. I’ve deleted it (in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170589310), but can you please be more careful not to add duplicate stuff to the map? Thanks, and happy editing :) commented 2025-08-17 22:52:45 UTC by gurglypipe ♦910 |
| 152538190 (Comments: 1) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Find ich erst mal gut, die Rheinallee 88 hier an die Industriefläche zu taggen. osm.org findet damit aber leider nichts unter der Suche nach "rheinallee 88 mainz" das ist nicht so optimal. Ich hab jetzt noch nicht tiefer gesucht, hast ... commented 2025-08-17 22:30:02 UTC by dreua ♦120 |
| 170588379 (Comments: 1) | Łukasz Wasiak (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-08-17 22:11:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170581745 (Comments: 3) | TheUKHighStreet (Discussed changesets: 17) | Found it. https://uk.representclo.com/pages/represent-retail-store-manchester commented 2025-08-17 22:10:50 UTC by TheUKHighStreet ♦16 |
| 168957968 (Comments: 1) | Parcanman (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi there. I don't think this edit worked the way you hoped it would. The direction of the road should match the way it was drawn. You can reverse it using the right click menu or the "v" key. The way it's currently tagged with one... commented 2025-08-17 22:03:11 UTC by BPTT ♦87 |
| 170588240 (Comments: 1) | Łukasz Wasiak (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-17 22:00:55 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 148318041 (Comments: 1) | Ewrt1 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170588311 commented 2025-08-17 22:00:44 UTC by Ewrt1 ♦48 |
| 170555588 (Comments: 3) | gmbo (Discussed changesets: 94) | Ich habe wohl im Josm-Fenster etwas hineinkopiert was in den Editor solle. ist herausgelöscht. Vielen Dank für die Aufmerksamkeit. commented 2025-08-17 21:59:50 UTC by gmbo ♦46 |
| 169425316 (Comments: 1) | Aaro Hart (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, living street should be marked by a corresponding traffic sign. By your description I'm not sure if the decision was made based on this information. commented 2025-08-17 21:54:39 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦499 |
| 170582529 (Comments: 2) | muralito (Discussed changesets: 67) | #MOHAMED commented 2025-08-17 21:47:22 UTC by MOHAMEDHAMLV ♦1 |
| 170587819 (Comments: 1) | Jakaka2222 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bron vergeten sorry: Satellietportaal, PDOK luchtfoto, ontwerp commented 2025-08-17 21:43:24 UTC by Jakaka2222 ♦5 |
| 170575416 (Comments: 1) | Pellinger-Hof (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, wozu soll dieser Knoten hier dienen? Er befindet sich innerhalb von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287306110 mit Name "Reitanlage Am Höthkopf". Eigentlich ist es besser, eine Reitanlage nur einmal zu mappen, also nicht gleich... commented 2025-08-17 21:40:03 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦783 |
| 170327595 (Comments: 10) | bdiscoe (Discussed changesets: 55) | There is my list of ~8000 fairways left to fix, but then there is a list of changes that have been made in the last 24 hours that gets generated every day. This secondary list ranges from 0 to 50 course elements to review and is reviewed nightly so t... commented 2025-08-17 21:37:16 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 158639691 (Comments: 3) | asdfgh1234 (Discussed changesets: 2) | A, i podstawowy błąd tej zmiany - skasowałeś stary węzeł, by wstawić nowy gdzie indziej. Ograniczaj świadome usuwanie punktu do minimum. commented 2025-08-17 21:29:55 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦199 |
| 159220765 (Comments: 4) | devot (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dans ce cas, il y a lieu de supprimer le toponyme Savournin, car je ne suis pas certain qu'il soit usité. En ce qui concerne le toponyme Bourgade, j'ai noté sur place qu'il existait un panneau indiquant le "chemin ... commented 2025-08-17 21:26:52 UTC by devot ♦3 |
| 43045260 (Comments: 5) | Planvoll (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo Planvoll, mir geht es in erster Linie um die Zuverlässigkeit der Daten in OSM und nicht mehr verifizierbare "historische" Objekte sind ein Thema, um das permanent gestritten wird. Ein komplett verfüllter und über... commented 2025-08-17 21:20:31 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦69 |
| 170587192 (Comments: 1) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 79) | jerk! commented 2025-08-17 21:17:04 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170576236 (Comments: 4) | Caerandir (Discussed changesets: 3) | OK, das mit dem Verkehrsschild ist auf jeden Fall eine klare Sache. Ich erinnere mich gar nicht mehr dass der so weit asphaltiert ist - kann aber sein, ist länger her, dass ich da war :-) Ich mache die Access Rights wieder rückgängi... commented 2025-08-17 21:13:03 UTC by Caerandir ♦8 |
| 168032877 (Comments: 1) | snikers89 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4915620 commented 2025-08-17 21:03:50 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,107 |
| 170074925 (Comments: 1) | Beinardus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, possibly you meant survey:date rather than surrey:date? commented 2025-08-17 20:56:09 UTC by Famlam ♦306 |
| 138162615 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 224) | eenrichting stond in omgekeerde richting ;) commented 2025-08-17 20:50:26 UTC by kabelhaai ♦40 |
| 170452910 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | poprawione commented 2025-08-17 20:47:11 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170506777 (Comments: 1) | Titanflex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, die Nennweite wird ohne Einheit (mm) eingetragen. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-17 20:35:28 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170315359 (Comments: 1) | Lucazwosta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. Viele Gr&u... commented 2025-08-17 20:22:29 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170455828 (Comments: 2) | Barroszt (Discussed changesets: 362) | naprawione commented 2025-08-17 20:20:40 UTC by Barroszt ♦257 |
| 170540786 (Comments: 2) | Matthijs Kooijman (Discussed changesets: 10) | W00ps, I intended to add name=Fuchsbau, but seems I typed the name into the key field instead of the value field. Fixed now, thanks for paying attention! commented 2025-08-17 20:20:31 UTC by Matthijs Kooijman ♦10 |
| 170561177 (Comments: 1) | jpol (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciągi pieszo rowerowe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422819008 oznaczamy jako: ``` highway=path bicycle=designated foot=designated segregated=no ``` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower&oa... commented 2025-08-17 20:19:08 UTC by Marek-M ♦915 |
| 170325901 (Comments: 3) | cleaner28 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ein Hinweis noch: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. commented 2025-08-17 20:18:47 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170329613 (Comments: 1) | cleaner28 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, bitte keine Angaben wie "?" oder "unbekannt" verwenden. Viele Grüße commented 2025-08-17 20:15:23 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170536189 (Comments: 7) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Newest imagery can be used for updating. But it should fit in with the surrounding. Never use only it to justify mass realignment. commented 2025-08-17 20:08:35 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,581 |
| 159949301 (Comments: 1) | Hreyfanleiki (Discussed changesets: 5) | Beste, Ik ben even de wegen aan het controleren met "designated". Ik merk op dat deze wel wat voorkomen. Heads up voor in de toekomst om designated best niet te gebruiken. Enkel "motor_vehicle=destination" is correct. De... commented 2025-08-17 20:04:12 UTC by kabelhaai ♦40 |
 | 169976937 (Comments: 1) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 29) | ok thanks commented 2025-08-17 20:03:45 UTC by Niquarl ♦5 |
| 167597472 (Comments: 3) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 78) | Yeah, @StreetSurveyor, what you did here is a clear violatio of my request to discuss such access tag changes with the community before you act unilaterally. Your reasoning has been proven to be suitably different from that of other mappers that we c... commented 2025-08-17 19:53:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,454 |
| 170392415 (Comments: 1) | leobass (Discussed changesets: 13) | Рекомендую почитать описания тегов перед тем как менять разбитые лесохозяйственные дороги на тропы. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtrack |
| 170574528 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Please don't abuse these to show suggestions. Use uMap etc. commented 2025-08-17 19:47:45 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,581 |
| 170583018 (Comments: 1) | Martin Nogger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, das wurde gerade erst vor ein paar Tagen geändert. Kannst Du kurz erklären, welches Problem vorliegt ? Falls es um Routing ins Kreuzgäßchen geht, ich denke, das ist so gewünscht. Was hier vielmeh... commented 2025-08-17 19:45:35 UTC by limes11 ♦912 |
| 170565882 (Comments: 1) | Mapper9174 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Mapper.. Je vraagt feedback Beter geen adresnode aanpassen. Dan komt een adres 2x voor en een ander adres is dan verdwenen uit de data. Ik heb het hersteld. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170565882 MVG eggie commented 2025-08-17 19:44:10 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170520527 (Comments: 4) | db-ak (Discussed changesets: 34) | Fajnie poprawiłeś, wygląda dobrze. Zabezpieczony szyb zmapowałbym z pomocą https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=borehole commented 2025-08-17 19:41:32 UTC by Aim311_ ♦123 |
| 170580061 (Comments: 1) | kawiwa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, es gibt hier bereits ein fixme, bitte nicht noch einen fast gleichlautenden Hinweis am gleichen Objekt. Es ist kein ausgewiesener Wanderweg und nicht auf offiziellen Karten. access=no wurde gesetzt, da der Weg in einem Naturschut... commented 2025-08-17 19:34:34 UTC by limes11 ♦912 |
| 170537605 (Comments: 1) | Kajak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/1669900988. What is the mean of the key ref:gn? commented 2025-08-17 19:17:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170531037 (Comments: 1) | arobl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/220868501. What is the mean of the tag "ref:" = "VC 13"? What ist the correct ref value "C 13" or "VC 13"? commented 2025-08-17 19:15:09 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170505427 (Comments: 1) | Samirabolouri61 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422582405 (one of six ways). What is the mean of the tags bar_mehvar = 16.0 block_type = 1 code = 1035 edarekol = جنوبشرق edarekol_i = 9 end_stati0 = 59... commented 2025-08-17 19:08:50 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170582928 (Comments: 1) | Jordi MF_import (Discussed changesets: 9) | Error en el comentari. S'han afegit edificis i zona de granja del Mas de la Vall commented 2025-08-17 19:06:41 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,653 |
| 147913668 (Comments: 3) | Rassilon (Discussed changesets: 19) | I think Brazillian Portuguese is just pt in OSM. I changed it: osm.org/changeset/170582860 commented 2025-08-17 19:04:46 UTC by Niquarl ♦5 |
| 170328639 (Comments: 4) | Paco Col (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ya lo he corregido todo. Conforme el ayuntamiento vaya nombrando oficialmente las calles se pondrán los nuevos nombres commented 2025-08-17 18:59:32 UTC by jemily1 ♦65 |
| 170061144 (Comments: 2) | Mark Martinec (Discussed changesets: 20) | Ok, done. Thanks for the suggestion! commented 2025-08-17 18:59:03 UTC by Mark Martinec ♦17 |
| 134375807 (Comments: 7) | Qitay (Discussed changesets: 34) | Thank you for the context of the place import. I don't know if a tool already exists, but I agree that it should be possible to do it in a more automated way. I used the balloon tool to create the geometry and replaced an old way per clo... commented 2025-08-17 18:55:24 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦827 |
| 170226049 (Comments: 1) | Bamamba85 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please do not name golf lines to represent which course they belong to. The name=* tag should only be used for elements that have an official name. commented 2025-08-17 18:49:29 UTC by pontificator_extraordinaire ♦7 |
| 170581449 (Comments: 1) | Vít Hnilica (Discussed changesets: 1) | fix: path to Mukhadze:) commented 2025-08-17 18:49:25 UTC by Vít Hnilica ♦1 |
| 170495651 (Comments: 6) | kadiwa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ok, scheinbar interpretiert man es in Hamburg einfach wirklich anders als in anderen Orten teilweise. Ich dachte immer, die StVO wäre bundeseinheitlich… Dieser Post fast es eigentlich zusammen https://radverkehrsforum.de/forum/thre... commented 2025-08-17 18:47:29 UTC by kadiwa ♦43 |
| 169857652 (Comments: 3) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 43) | @VA00 użycie tagu jest ustalane na wątku https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/propozycja-uzywania-znacznika-access-control-w-polsce/122262 commented 2025-08-17 18:32:42 UTC by pavvv ♦533 |
| 170511479 (Comments: 2) | Agustin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Barrier:bar commented 2025-08-17 18:00:50 UTC by Agustin ♦4 |
| 170566399 (Comments: 3) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 88) | Aha, a jakbyś się zastanawiał dlaczego secondary. Wystarczy spojrzeć na oznakowanie przy rondzie na Zatorskiej i widać jak jest prowadzony objazd. commented 2025-08-17 17:25:44 UTC by Yunkers ♦377 |
| 170307984 (Comments: 1) | Ezra Jenks (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hey a heads up that the surface=fine_gravel vs surface=gravel situation is a little bit sticky in OSM. My understanding is that originally gravel meant more like fist-sized and larger stones, (not the way we Americans use that word) and fine_gravel i... commented 2025-08-17 17:19:12 UTC by Xvtn ♦471 |
 | 150545194 (Comments: 1) | Rentaap (Discussed changesets: 1) | testeto2 commented 2025-08-17 17:16:51 UTC by Bigoton2025 ♦3 |
| 170502290 (Comments: 2) | Valenting01 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello, It's a mistake, I just removed it commented 2025-08-17 17:04:32 UTC by Valenting01 ♦6 |
| 157839397 (Comments: 1) | MarbleRock (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hm, Amazinga (https://amazinga.fun/atrakcije/) i slični su prije https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=indoor_play što je bilo originalno nego https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=sports_centre ("Facilities within a ... commented 2025-08-17 16:56:41 UTC by Matija Nalis ♦118 |
| 168068749 (Comments: 1) | chamdam (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello, are you sure there is a trolleybus traction line here? commented 2025-08-17 16:55:41 UTC by stasiu512 ♦168 |
| 170306216 (Comments: 1) | forcella (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, did this way got blocked due to the landslide? Then there should be some access tag on the way to mark it as unusable. commented 2025-08-17 16:18:56 UTC by mueschel ♦6,617 |
| 163877465 (Comments: 2) | kabelhaai (Discussed changesets: 19) | 3.5t nog te doen dan commented 2025-08-17 16:16:20 UTC by kabelhaai ♦40 |
| 139221174 (Comments: 3) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Eine asphaltierte Straße ist gemäß Wiki normalerweise ein grade1. Daher Frage ich. Sie müsste schon in desolaten Zustand sein, um grade2 zu rechtfertigen. Anders gesagt, wenn du ein Asphalt setzt, würde ich eine gleichz... commented 2025-08-17 15:52:57 UTC by Geo-Tobi ♦298 |
| 170571459 (Comments: 1) | Bamamba85 (Discussed changesets: 12) | You deleted the previous green that was drawn here to draw your own. There are some problems with that. The first is that you lose the history of the node you deleted. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history) The other problem is... commented 2025-08-17 15:47:11 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170422451 (Comments: 1) | matatou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Vous avez (involontairement, sûrement) déplacé un point d'une piste cyclable à plusieurs centaines de mètres, générant un tracé incohérent. Je m'occupe de la correcti... commented 2025-08-17 15:27:38 UTC by TheFighter137 ♦10 |
| 170571287 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 25) | oh well https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170571545 commented 2025-08-17 15:05:08 UTC by Kovirii ♦31 |
| 170568981 (Comments: 1) | G951 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please, check the DBUG Telecom and Rb telecom, to add a category to this, i cannot find in options commented 2025-08-17 14:31:04 UTC by G951 ♦1 |
| 168596607 (Comments: 1) | martin_schnurer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Na otvárací čas použi pomôcku https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ aby nebol preklep. commented 2025-08-17 14:13:33 UTC by Dodko ♦1,225 |
| 168184897 (Comments: 3) | Freek_ (Discussed changesets: 23) | Bedankt! commented 2025-08-17 14:13:26 UTC by QuantumSnow ♦1 |
| 170547748 (Comments: 1) | Omikom72 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. В тег name помещают название объекта. "Место рядом с рекой" - это не название объекта, а его описание. https://wiki.openstreetma... commented 2025-08-17 14:11:17 UTC by mavl ♦76,098 |
| 170503671 (Comments: 1) | Polarograma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bienvenido Polarograma, He visto que has liminado el nodo del centro de salud para añadir el nombre en un área. Sin embargo, en ese nodo estaba el número de teléfono que ahora se ha perdido y, también, la eti... commented 2025-08-17 14:06:15 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,653 |
| 170568285 (Comments: 1) | Niquarl (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4810318 commented 2025-08-17 13:57:07 UTC by Niquarl ♦5 |
| 147124952 (Comments: 1) | Alibee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ist die Brücke gesperrt oder wieso das access=no? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246799280 Grüße Chris commented 2025-08-17 13:53:17 UTC by chris66 ♦382 |
| 169473420 (Comments: 3) | Ralf74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung. Im Forum ist gerade eine Diskussion entstanden ob nicht vielleicht "leisure=track" besser wäre. Falls es dich interessiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mb-downhillstrecken-als-h... commented 2025-08-17 13:50:02 UTC by Herr Bause ♦3 |
| 170549474 (Comments: 2) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 335) | It's added as a track, blocked halfway by a 'barrier=block'. There is no routing now. commented 2025-08-17 13:49:39 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,670 |
| 170560579 (Comments: 8) | Graaf84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wanneer je denkt dat dit geen aangegeven parkeerplaats is kan deze wel weg.Wat minder verwarring. Overigens staat de parkeerplaats op private. Ik valideer ook maar op afstand. 100% krijg je het nooit. Ondertussen gebruiken profession... commented 2025-08-17 13:43:19 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 169187427 (Comments: 1) | threefoursixninefour (Discussed changesets: 12) | You tagged the trails as "highway=cycleway". According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking#General_Tags_for_ways_that_are_suitable_for_mtbiking,_but_not_directly_related_to_mtbiking_as_such this is not correct. commented 2025-08-17 13:31:48 UTC by p1230 ♦11 |
| 170362377 (Comments: 3) | __yoshita__ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the review—understood: separate building outlines and Q to square rectangles. I’ll re-check and apply this next time. Best regards. commented 2025-08-17 13:26:30 UTC by __yoshita__ ♦1 |
| 170404730 (Comments: 9) | bqnk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wycofałem zmianę. Ta droga jeszcze nie pełni funkcji krajowej, przy rondzie z Zatorską są bardzo jasno widoczne znaki z objazdem commented 2025-08-17 13:13:13 UTC by Yunkers ♦377 |
| 167823877 (Comments: 4) | bhmaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Vielen Dank für die Korrekturen. Ich hab in letzter Zeit auch versucht aufzuräumen, kann sein, daß ich was übersehen habe. commented 2025-08-17 13:12:33 UTC by bhmaps ♦2 |
 | 170555226 (Comments: 1) | Merna_mahmoud (Discussed changesets: 6) | Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2024-08-13 commented 2025-08-17 13:08:55 UTC by Merna_mahmoud ♦13 |
| 170525919 (Comments: 2) | felidaelynx (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Map47 Thanks for your explanation about what and why it is wrong! I thought that since the Portes du Soleil represents an area the best way of representing that would be a multipolygon (but I now see that is wrong), especially since site=pis... commented 2025-08-17 13:05:34 UTC by felidaelynx ♦3 |
| 163412271 (Comments: 2) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 269) | Skoro jest tam/będzie highway=motorway to samo przez się implikuje motorroad=yes. Po co dublować tagi? commented 2025-08-17 12:53:13 UTC by Szymson ♦388 |
| 170518543 (Comments: 3) | elesmod (Discussed changesets: 5) | IMHO ten obiekt to prawdopodobnie bardziej „sklep firmowy” niż „firma”; można też taki opisowy przedrostek pominąć (ogólnie zazwyczaj się je pomija, po prostu name=„Sklep firmowy Nazwa Własna” jest mn... commented 2025-08-17 12:45:36 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,024 |
| 113239357 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Ziemlich sicher ein Vertipper, allerdings weiss ich jetzt nicht mehr, ob dort auch schon maxspeed=30 gilt... commented 2025-08-17 12:42:27 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 127705077 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Ok, danke! commented 2025-08-17 12:41:42 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 170361232 (Comments: 3) | Flo_007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für deine Rückmeldung. :-) Es ging konkret um die Ergänzung der folgenden Haltestellen: - "Schmidt Am Scheidbaum": Diese kennt der AVV nicht (Netzplan, GTFS-Daten). Die einzige Linie, die dort verkehrt, ist das M&... commented 2025-08-17 12:40:54 UTC by aixbrick ♦850 |
| 104163274 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | OK. commented 2025-08-17 12:38:48 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 28553226 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo, die Isartalbahn hat früher einmal über diese (schon lange) gesperrte Brücke geführt. commented 2025-08-17 12:37:25 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 30338598 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Zu spät ;) commented 2025-08-17 12:36:09 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 42840372 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Du hattest (und hast ;) ) absolut recht! vG Stephen commented 2025-08-17 12:35:41 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 53021154 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Du hattest (und hast ;) ) absolut recht! vG Stephen commented 2025-08-17 12:35:12 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 131549429 (Comments: 1) | cEvLGWiQ (Discussed changesets: 30) | Warum wurde der Knoten: Subgrafik.de (4927003185) gelöscht? Why was Subgrafik.de (4927003185) deleted? commented 2025-08-17 12:33:32 UTC by Subgrafik ♦1 |
| 154682371 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Sorry, hatte ich wohl leider verwechselt. commented 2025-08-17 12:32:31 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 170522970 (Comments: 3) | elkodr (Discussed changesets: 14) | Can you tell us which routing engine(s) are failing to use footway with bicycle=yes paths? because it should be able to route on them and you will get messages from other users saying "this is mapping for the router". Komoot and OSRM (the o... commented 2025-08-17 12:30:26 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦377 |
| 122887812 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Sorry, sehe den Kommentar erst jetzt. Ist allerdings ja schon eingearbeitet. commented 2025-08-17 12:28:41 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 136238462 (Comments: 2) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo, wahrscheinlich hast Du sehr recht, aber ich kann das nicht mehr prüfen, weil zu weit weg. commented 2025-08-17 12:24:51 UTC by heilbron ♦32 |
| 170416808 (Comments: 3) | osminng (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170563509 keretében történt a visszaállítás commented 2025-08-17 12:18:12 UTC by osminng ♦15 |
| 168717977 (Comments: 1) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 110) | Der Bahnhof Rheydt-Odenkirchen IST barrierefrei. commented 2025-08-17 12:13:47 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦11 |
| 168686817 (Comments: 2) | hybridOL (Discussed changesets: 19) | Die Haltestelle Varreler Straße war entfallen, da habe ich nicht gesehen, dass zwei Routen nun gleich waren. Habe nun alle nochmal geprüft und durchnummeriert, sollte dann passen commented 2025-08-17 12:11:53 UTC by hybridOL ♦29 |
| 128752614 (Comments: 2) | ggrab (Discussed changesets: 15) | Danke, habe ich korrigiert, sodass nun der Wegweiser gleich wie die Hütte mit 1882 angegeben ist. commented 2025-08-17 12:11:04 UTC by ggrab ♦17 |
| 170555678 (Comments: 1) | clemensosm123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nur das jetzt einige Stop positions als rolle platform_entry_only haben, während die platform rollen unverändert sind. Bitte entweder den stop positionen "stop_entry_only_ ubd den platform "platform_entry_only geben, oder diese &A... commented 2025-08-17 11:53:22 UTC by emergency99 ♦291 |
| 170551376 (Comments: 1) | leobass (Discussed changesets: 13) | service=alley лишний тег это для дорог на задах домов, часто сельских, где дети играют и барбекю устраивают. В России нечасто встречается. commented 2025-08-17 11:04:06 UTC by literan ♦6,752 |
| 170534337 (Comments: 3) | Nougcat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dodam przy okazji, że EGiB przedstawia prawie że zawsze obrys parteru, stąd miejscami może się wydawać, że coś jest nie tak. commented 2025-08-17 10:52:51 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦199 |
| 170383468 (Comments: 1) | xraus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13068488929. What is the mean of the tags lavice = ano odpadkový koš = ano stul = ano ? commented 2025-08-17 10:46:32 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170554034 (Comments: 1) | Constrado (Discussed changesets: 76) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170559045 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18624 for more details commented 2025-08-17 10:32:30 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,597 |
| 170559045 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse_Revert (Discussed changesets: 1840) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 170554034. commented 2025-08-17 10:32:30 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,597 |
| 170382406 (Comments: 2) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 65) | Oops thank you, will go through and clean that up. commented 2025-08-17 10:29:41 UTC by whammo ♦86 |
| 170086070 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170085322 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170094773 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170093209 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:08 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170045479 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170047240 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170035702 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169993256 (Comments: 2) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169989268 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170043795 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:07 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169983043 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169984463 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169983879 (Comments: 2) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169944589 (Comments: 2) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169937779 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169933346 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:06 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 169932237 (Comments: 2) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:21:05 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170281126 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170330123 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170272569 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170284744 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170273553 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170133423 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:15 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170145423 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:15 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170133620 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:15 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170096681 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:15 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170202571 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:18:15 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170536583 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:12 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170491524 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:12 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170491056 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:12 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170423496 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170470169 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170469090 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170467176 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170448459 (Comments: 2) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170420187 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170429621 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170428643 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:11 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170373261 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170416684 (Comments: 2) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170366884 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170368954 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170366620 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170415348 (Comments: 2) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170366655 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:10 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170365936 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170331540 (Comments: 1) | RIYAN SAPUTRA19 (Discussed changesets: 47) | This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139 Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/186... commented 2025-08-17 10:17:09 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 154397768 (Comments: 3) | EUMapper (Discussed changesets: 36) | 🤩 commented 2025-08-17 10:08:24 UTC by Penegal ♦26 |
| 170473987 (Comments: 2) | strobus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Apologies, I've been procrastinating adding a number of OSM points for years and thought better late than never. WIll try to add fewer at a time. commented 2025-08-17 10:03:14 UTC by strobus ♦1 |
| 164629790 (Comments: 2) | MichaelCollinson (Discussed changesets: 90) | Yes, your summise correct. Corrected now. Thanks for pointing out. commented 2025-08-17 10:02:32 UTC by MichaelCollinson ♦55 |
| 170365178 (Comments: 1) | niwa-shi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while it is still selected. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-08-17 09:57:37 UTC by Frans S ♦9,868 |
| 170557119 (Comments: 1) | ArtJacht (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-08-17 09:50:56 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 167495886 (Comments: 1) | judelo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Le chemin était déjà indiqué en privé, ce qui va dans le sens de votre commentaire et n'est pas pris en compte par le routage des applications. On peut également ajouté barrier=gate... commented 2025-08-17 09:45:02 UTC by _1110 ♦2 |
| 168097841 (Comments: 3) | ywanght (Discussed changesets: 20) | 原来如此。感谢解惑。 commented 2025-08-17 09:38:46 UTC by wanght ♦1 |
| 170480871 (Comments: 1) | Prefeitura de Sumaré (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/527147254 (one of four ways). What is the mean of the tag Decreto = 6961/22 ? commented 2025-08-17 09:37:44 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170553391 (Comments: 3) | Jos Klever (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke... Up to you wat je wil toevoegen :).. Ik zal je onze welkomstmail sturen per PB met tips en trick.. en met wat nuttige links. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-17 09:33:01 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 165358913 (Comments: 4) | blckdrgn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, thanks! commented 2025-08-17 09:30:03 UTC by blckdrgn ♦2 |
| 170552479 (Comments: 2) | roelant (Discussed changesets: 5) | No problem. 😊 commented 2025-08-17 09:20:25 UTC by roelant ♦12 |
 | 170529862 (Comments: 3) | jack walker2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | In this case, however, following the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:zh?uselang=en it is *not* recommended to set name:zh since name:zh-Hans and name:zh-Hant have already been in use. name:zh only serves as fallback in... commented 2025-08-17 09:18:32 UTC by limes11 ♦912 |
| 170525648 (Comments: 1) | murmeldin (Discussed changesets: 1) | shop=alcohol Żabka (?) - the flooring shop "Parkiecik" is located here https://parkiecik.pl/?page_id=128 commented 2025-08-17 09:08:04 UTC by JG Mazury ♦3 |
| 170502244 (Comments: 3) | wolfgang kuehn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, ich hielt die drei Wege für einen guten Kompromiss. Auf vergleichbaren Flächen sieht man auch schon einmal 10 Wege und mehr. (Siehe z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.198474&mlon=6.694091#map=19/51.198473/6.694091&am... commented 2025-08-17 09:05:38 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170539162 (Comments: 1) | Vasconza (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-17 09:02:05 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 169835031 (Comments: 1) | icluf (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, L'itinéraire du réseau contient une limite administrative. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19415623#map=15/45.66649/6.39769&layers=PN Je corrige. Cordialement, Yves — Groupe OSM ... commented 2025-08-17 08:48:36 UTC by pyrog ♦356 |
| 168637165 (Comments: 1) | rhuovp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Waarop baseer je dat dit de Scoutsdreef is? De huizen langs dit stuk hebben adressen van de Rallylaan. Op het GRB staat dit nog deels verkeerd, ik doe opnieuw een melding bij de gemeente. commented 2025-08-17 08:41:44 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,210 |
| 170216145 (Comments: 1) | icluf (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, Merci pour l'ajout des lames directionnelles de ce poteau : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13060119806 J'ai corrigé les le schéma de description des lames. J'ai aussi supprimé le &q... commented 2025-08-17 08:07:25 UTC by pyrog ♦356 |
| 170528063 (Comments: 1) | CCCGGG (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi CCCGGG, It's overdue to start using JOSM as there are several forest outline parts that should be outer, not inner. JOSM would warn before saving. Also at 1807 members way overdue to split this MP relation. The OSM recommended maximum ... commented 2025-08-17 07:53:39 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,446 |
| 164541036 (Comments: 3) | vikiawv (Discussed changesets: 21) | Danke für den Hinweis! commented 2025-08-17 07:32:52 UTC by vikiawv ♦18 |
| 170515630 (Comments: 1) | TommyRobloxOfficial (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history commented 2025-08-17 07:22:03 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,024 |
| 170546214 (Comments: 1) | ralphioli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-17 07:21:48 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170451492 (Comments: 1) | nimumane (Discussed changesets: 3) | Väylät on jo erotettu niiden tyyppien (highway=*) mukaan. commented 2025-08-17 07:16:46 UTC by rle32795 ♦22 |
| 170518300 (Comments: 1) | elesmod (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ogólnie droga nie powinna współdzielić węzłów z parkingiem (to niezależne obiekty, nie łączymy ich też dla rutingu), chyba że faktycznie granica parkingu biegnie środkiem drogi. Dla parkingu przydałyby się... commented 2025-08-17 07:03:43 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,024 |
| 157509544 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 861) | This is what happens if some software developer decides to add new tags without discussion and documentation. "menu:url" was the tag used until a while ago (that is the tag in line with others like "opening_hours:url"). |
| 170500340 (Comments: 1) | Tewuzij (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/1902682. What ist the mean of the tag UArea = 3194.72? Is this a national reference number for administrative areas? Wouldn't nat_ref:VN:area be easier to interpret? commented 2025-08-17 06:58:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170541006 (Comments: 3) | Imzadi1979 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for confirming. I understand why you removed it, the network=US:US tag made it look like an active route. However, old highway alignments are often kept in OSM, just with corrected tagging (e.g. old_ref=*, name=Old US 131, and no netwo... commented 2025-08-17 06:52:42 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170538146 (Comments: 1) | Secretary The Peninsula (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcolme to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-08-17 06:44:55 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170538067 (Comments: 1) | Andrey_Velotourist (Discussed changesets: 1) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. I noticed that you have made numerous name changes in this changeset. Please note that in Ukraine the name=* tag should contain the official Ukrainian name, while other language versions (such as Russian... commented 2025-08-17 06:42:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170537964 (Comments: 1) | Matvee (Discussed changesets: 10) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. I noticed that you have made numerous name changes in this changeset. Please note that in Ukraine the name=* tag should contain the official Ukrainian name, while other language versions (such as Russian... commented 2025-08-17 06:41:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170547143 (Comments: 1) | 刘克清 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18622 commented 2025-08-17 06:36:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 170459624 (Comments: 3) | wolfgang kuehn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, danke für die Antwort. Könnte dies noch in verschiedenen Tags bei der Node hinterlegt werden? Aktuell ist es nur ein name und ein locality-Key, was dann vermutlich auch nicht ganz richtig ist. https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-08-17 06:35:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170419426 (Comments: 5) | Nord Ambulanse (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Sylabowy Kot - Thanks for your comment. Could you clarify how this relates to the changeset or the mapping in this area? commented 2025-08-17 06:33:55 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170548263 (Comments: 1) | yapbmore (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-08-17 06:30:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170367421 (Comments: 2) | محمد2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - deletion of apparent existing features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170550014 commented 2025-08-17 06:25:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 169587517 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Only the MerredinLink that I can see of. But that is easily fixable and so I will do it myself. commented 2025-08-17 06:24:35 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦18 |
| 170495531 (Comments: 1) | Bosse09 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18621 commented 2025-08-17 06:09:58 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 170540493 (Comments: 1) | 58MoonlightWolf85 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18620 commented 2025-08-17 05:56:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,166 |
| 169797708 (Comments: 1) | seateaeye (Discussed changesets: 6) | I say that the neighborhood to the west of Rancho Rinconda is Wilson Park. https://nextdoor.com/neighborhood/wilsonparkcup--cupertino--ca/ Further west, it's probably City Center. The authoritative one from Cupertino doesn't of... commented 2025-08-17 05:50:46 UTC by Black_Diamond ♦64 |
| 170533379 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 521) | Jeden z problemów tutaj jest że całkowicie nieistotne drogi mogą być bezkolizyjne, przynajmniej na jakichś ich fragmencie. Patrz też np. Trasa Wolbromska w https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.113599/19.91556 commented 2025-08-17 04:28:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 170322301 (Comments: 4) | しげ坊 (Discussed changesets: 6) | すみません。別のアカウントで返信してしまいました。 (こっそり使っていたアカウントなので、正体がバレてしまったかも...) commented 2025-08-17 03:00:56 UTC by Mappin' Jack Flash ♦235 |
| 164208016 (Comments: 1) | PedroFrancisco_G (Discussed changesets: 1) | Qual a fonte dos dados para nomes de ruas? commented 2025-08-17 02:51:21 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,178 |
| 170461903 (Comments: 1) | 中日ファン (Discussed changesets: 1) | こんにちは。 OpenStreetMap (OSM) は現実の世界に存在する地物をマッピングし、正確で最新の地図をつくっていくプロジェクトです。(real and current) また、OSMの地図データはゲームだけでな... commented 2025-08-17 01:20:17 UTC by Mappin' Jack Flash ♦235 |
| 170413787 (Comments: 1) | nanapapa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted (vandalism) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170545985 JA:破壊行為 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-08-17 01:16:15 UTC by Mappin' Jack Flash ♦235 |
| 170543166 (Comments: 2) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 148) | Hi, I'm aware theres some other quality issues around this import that need to be discussed first before resuming however I can maybe help out with licensing. I live quite close to a Statistics NZ office and are happy to go there next week and t... commented 2025-08-17 00:50:57 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦36 |
| 170396927 (Comments: 1) | STALKER++ (Discussed changesets: 2) | вы про эти кабинки? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1265541221284373&focus=photo commented 2025-08-17 00:06:30 UTC by 4004 ♦1,897 |
| 170391041 (Comments: 1) | Pavelfantik (Discussed changesets: 119) | мне кажется, если сервис проходит через здание, это все еще сервис, а не коридор commented 2025-08-17 00:03:18 UTC by 4004 ♦1,897 |
| 170450059 (Comments: 1) | maxbritov (Discussed changesets: 2) | здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. теги поправлю, только не удаляйте тег здания в следующий раз, когда выбираете заготовку магазина commented 2025-08-16 23:56:21 UTC by 4004 ♦1,897 |
| 169108352 (Comments: 1) | HerryCFPL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Herry, something is wrong, you put 宇宙 (the universe) as the animal species: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13006858152 could you take a look at it? thanks and good mapping commented 2025-08-16 22:25:09 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,769 |
| 170531197 (Comments: 1) | maurizioa (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi, You have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119303155 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422659691 as equestrian centres (leisure=horse_riding). It is very unlikely that these two areas are two separate equestrian centres, ... commented 2025-08-16 22:12:43 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦783 |
| 145830255 (Comments: 1) | Rkkrakow (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743454556 Czy ten podjazd na pewno jest asfaltowy? commented 2025-08-16 21:44:16 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,107 |
| 163250523 (Comments: 1) | Sir Farouk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, watch what you are uploading to OSM and be careful not to mess up useful existing features commented 2025-08-16 21:39:57 UTC by Enock4seth ♦554 |
| 133503115 (Comments: 2) | clay_c (Discussed changesets: 110) | Thanks for the tip. I left a reply on the note. Some map renderers mistakenly show these giant detention basins as solid bodies of water, which periodically causes edit wars when new mappers remove the basin tags. I wonder if this is related to the r... commented 2025-08-16 21:34:57 UTC by clay_c ♦516 |
| 170503130 (Comments: 1) | Mikhail Chayka (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Unless the camp is named "Camp Pitch near Trapper Creek Trail" can you remove the name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2025-08-16 21:34:42 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170500319 (Comments: 1) | sherkai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170500319 commented 2025-08-16 21:32:18 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170499810 (Comments: 1) | sherkai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170499810 commented 2025-08-16 21:32:12 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170542187 (Comments: 1) | charl3s (Discussed changesets: 182) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075067253 Pozdrawia... commented 2025-08-16 21:32:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170499546 (Comments: 1) | sherkai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Isn't the QFC accross 228th Ave SW? I've reverted this edit but can restore it if the QFC did moved. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170499546 commented 2025-08-16 21:32:03 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170280125 (Comments: 1) | inlik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Καλησπέρα σας. Ανήκω στους εθελοντές του OpenStreetMap... commented 2025-08-16 21:30:07 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦127 |
| 170363448 (Comments: 2) | JanB27 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ja macht Sinn, hab ich verpeilt commented 2025-08-16 21:07:31 UTC by JanB27 ♦5 |
| 170497868 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 60) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Motorway_classifications commented 2025-08-16 21:04:32 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦70 |
 | 170480951 (Comments: 1) | sorin666 (Discussed changesets: 3) | What is the source these shops. They look unlikely. Cheers Phil commented 2025-08-16 20:59:12 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,382 |
| 110182514 (Comments: 1) | yop_tup (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, ¿podrías corregir las calles que cambiaste incorrectamente a highway=service sin motivo? Las vías de servicio son vías de acceso a lugares concretos, pero no calles y menos con nombre. La navegaci&oacut... commented 2025-08-16 20:58:31 UTC by kapazao ♦918 |
| 170513092 (Comments: 1) | Pierre Guillou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, merci, mais autant conserver l'ancien nom dans old_name. commented 2025-08-16 20:57:56 UTC by trial ♦894 |
| 159889288 (Comments: 1) | MaxisCze (Discussed changesets: 1) | "57 (1108975950), v7" byla 9 měsíců celá ulice jako jednosměrka a navigaci to tahalo oklikou. Opraveno. + Vytvořena i odbočka (k cestě 1339879644) ze severu do firmy. commented 2025-08-16 20:38:13 UTC by Malý hajzl ♦11 |
| 109770296 (Comments: 8) | gebux (Discussed changesets: 49) | ich frag noch beim TVB wegen 54 nach commented 2025-08-16 20:30:11 UTC by kuhni74 ♦369 |
| 170503070 (Comments: 3) | KhalidKashmiri (Discussed changesets: 8) | Racja, dzięki. Chociaż dowiedziałem się, że Skorosze, Skoroszki oraz Skorosze leżą na tej samej długości geograficznej commented 2025-08-16 20:22:58 UTC by KhalidKashmiri ♦7 |
| 170539824 (Comments: 1) | IJsbeerSama (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-16 20:21:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170529791 (Comments: 1) | ernie77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hei, voisitko kirjoittaa pelkän viivan sijasta mitä muutoksia teit? commented 2025-08-16 20:18:54 UTC by Larmax ♦283 |
| 169505877 (Comments: 1) | Michel Delisle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Petite erreur détectée. Vous avez dessiné une voie d'accès entre la rue Galt et le service au volant du Tim Hortons. Pas de problème, j'ai corrigé le problème. Soyez particuli&egrav... commented 2025-08-16 20:18:23 UTC by jfd553 ♦56 |
| 170443718 (Comments: 2) | ESándor (Discussed changesets: 12) | "Eszterházi sétány"-ra kérdem commented 2025-08-16 20:02:30 UTC by vasony ♦513 |
| 170539928 (Comments: 1) | ForestFurnace (Discussed changesets: 32) | Mifflin Co, PA: Union Twp: Marked streets on private property w/o easements as private, realigned & renamed roads based on Mifflin County Parcel Viewer. Removed TIGER's private tags for residential roads near Shawnee Drive - these are Townsh... commented 2025-08-16 20:02:28 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦47 |
| 170539788 (Comments: 1) | baltpeter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mindestens bis 2021 war das wohl tatsächlich noch als Fuß- und Radweg ausgeschildert (vgl: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/u14183?lat=52.23409309999997&lng=10.528379599972027&z=19.45035721763025&pKey=946954226159682&focu... commented 2025-08-16 20:00:11 UTC by baltpeter ♦1 |
| X | 170502128 (Comments: 1) | Manajoana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please save in between edits in different continents. commented 2025-08-16 19:44:39 UTC by InsertUser ♦450 |
| 170538800 (Comments: 1) | traveleditor (Discussed changesets: 46) | Survey date: 2025-08-14 commented 2025-08-16 19:33:57 UTC by traveleditor ♦105 |
| 170538425 (Comments: 2) | kabelhaai (Discussed changesets: 19) | In de breedste zin van het woord: minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians. Toepasbaar? Of aan te passen. commented 2025-08-16 19:30:08 UTC by kabelhaai ♦40 |
| 170536968 (Comments: 1) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 110) | Dann fragen wir mal das Forum... commented 2025-08-16 19:20:48 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦734 |
| 170537674 (Comments: 1) | Kris74M (Discussed changesets: 58) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418573156 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-08-16 19:01:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170246025 (Comments: 4) | JR_Nl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Klopt... maar niet alle mappers houden zich daaraan 😀 commented 2025-08-16 19:00:54 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 154730578 (Comments: 1) | BUDO NDONBI MATHIAS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, if you are not sure about what you are mapping please do not add it to OpenStreetMap. commented 2025-08-16 18:52:23 UTC by Enock4seth ♦554 |
| 170456169 (Comments: 5) | Shadidaraa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks a lot. I think that means the wikipedia article is outdated at the moment. commented 2025-08-16 18:51:32 UTC by mtmail ♦149 |
| 170505700 (Comments: 1) | agrifolia (Discussed changesets: 5) | Nice work, thank you! commented 2025-08-16 18:49:04 UTC by stevea ♦309 |
| 165647799 (Comments: 2) | George S (Discussed changesets: 15) | Most of those "trails" are old logging roads and not officially maintained trails. They are usually a bit overgrown and difficult for casual user to follow. G commented 2025-08-16 18:48:22 UTC by George S ♦7 |
| 170346098 (Comments: 1) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello, you worked on the Caribbean. Used Bing, I did some worked there too. I want to let you know there better aerial images, see forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dataroom-caribisch-nederland/123206/4 Why is th... commented 2025-08-16 18:48:00 UTC by Allroads ♦427 |
| 170536878 (Comments: 1) | gigi2037 (Discussed changesets: 50) | prima che qualcuno mi dice che ho rotto delle relazzioni " lo so" commented 2025-08-16 18:41:56 UTC by gigi2037 ♦23 |
| 170536978 (Comments: 1) | demaniac (Discussed changesets: 118) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2917278333 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-08-16 18:41:09 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 150905007 (Comments: 2) | Wes Sleeman (Discussed changesets: 4) | And re-watching you can see the radome off to the left of the aircraft when landing. commented 2025-08-16 18:16:29 UTC by 0235 ♦30 |
| 170490872 (Comments: 1) | KLAUS RD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12849500411. What is the mean of the tags Aguas Servidas = Contaminación Residuoa Sólidos = Basura ? Please notice we use britisch English for keys and standarised... commented 2025-08-16 18:13:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 165146613 (Comments: 1) | Alex_mappt (Discussed changesets: 3) | Servus Alex, du hattest hier einen Biergarten eingetragen. Laut osm-wiki sollen reine Außenbewirtungsbereiche ohne die Möglichkeit eigene Speisen mitzubringen, nicht als amenity=biergarten, sondern als leisure=outdoor_seating erfasst werde... commented 2025-08-16 18:12:23 UTC by geow ♦449 |
| 170468059 (Comments: 2) | OSM_RogerWilco (Discussed changesets: 56) | Passt doch, oder nicht? commented 2025-08-16 18:11:49 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦734 |
| 170460193 (Comments: 1) | Canyon Runner (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/609329056. What is the mean of the tags CITYTOWN_NAME = Bedford CITYTOWN_SWIS = 552000 MUNNAME = Bedford OBJECTID_12 = 108879 PRINTKEY = 94.7-2-2 PROPADDRESS = 190 Chestnut Ridge ... commented 2025-08-16 18:06:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170263018 (Comments: 1) | Tom Stark (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Tom. In this changeset you created the AED https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13062335401 at this location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.15897&mlon=-3.32834#map=14/51.15897/-3.32834 This location looks to be in the midd... commented 2025-08-16 17:58:15 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦283 |
| 170529747 (Comments: 2) | Eva404 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je info heb ik samengevoegd met adresnode nr 18 gr eggie commented 2025-08-16 17:55:31 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170530644 (Comments: 3) | Marbled Stargazer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oke.. leisure=pitch toevoegen :) commented 2025-08-16 17:51:59 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170518872 (Comments: 3) | 58MoonlightWolf85 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170533379 - między innymi za brak dyskusji na forum przed zmianą istotnej drogi, braku podania sensownej przyczyny oraz dość ewidentne używanie dodatkowego konta (nie jestem w stanie uwierzyć b... commented 2025-08-16 17:48:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 168599758 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 299) | wycofanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168599758 na podstawie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stosowanie-tagu-highway-trunk-w-polsce/122106/607 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170534188 commented 2025-08-16 17:25:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 168281392 (Comments: 1) | szalona_entropia (Discussed changesets: 299) | wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170533992 na podstawie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stosowanie-tagu-highway-trunk-w-polsce/122106/607 commented 2025-08-16 17:22:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,896 |
| 166993977 (Comments: 9) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 78) | I have reverted StreetSurveyor's most recent change removing private-access tagging. This change was not discussed in the US community as required by the DWG comment upthread. commented 2025-08-16 17:20:19 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦566 |
| 170507414 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 60) | I am well aware of the difference. Many roads have short cul-de-sacs with no name but have the same address as the road they're branching off of, hence why I tagged these as highway=pipestem and addr:street=(road that it branches off of). commented 2025-08-16 16:33:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦70 |
| 159821723 (Comments: 1) | Wothan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Wothan, das Bing-Luftbild (falls du das benutzt hast) hat hier bei uns im Gegensatz zum NRW-Orthofoto einen leichten Versatz, daher würde ich zum Positionieren von kleinen Objekten wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/580277978... commented 2025-08-16 16:20:11 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦11 |
| 170400303 (Comments: 3) | Ján Lucik (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ako turistická atrakcia to kľudne môže ostať. Len vráťte aj to, že sa jedná o historic=tank. commented 2025-08-16 16:14:05 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 163155399 (Comments: 1) | p99 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo p99, weshalb hast du u. a. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10006628889/history neben der Namensänderung auch Tags wie die note und insbesondere kerb, pole und operator gelöscht? Weshalb sollen diese Tags kein... commented 2025-08-16 16:13:24 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦11 |
 | 170501780 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 152) | Thanks, I had forgotten to fix it, once I got home. commented 2025-08-16 16:12:17 UTC by b-unicycling ♦248 |
| 170530011 (Comments: 1) | Kyeraa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Svp niet naar de daken kijken en dan gebouwen aanpassen. Dit zijn vaak schuin genomen luchtfoto's. MV... commented 2025-08-16 16:10:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170530515 (Comments: 1) | FANLIRIBA (Discussed changesets: 1) | I live near Fanliriba and contributed a description to improve details of the village for better local mapping. commented 2025-08-16 16:03:09 UTC by FANLIRIBA ♦1 |
| 148457263 (Comments: 2) | Thingummy (Discussed changesets: 28) | Quite right thanks for letting me know. I don't currently know the exact location of the buoys which replace the lighthouse, or the Royal Sovereign Shoals themselves. If you know where they are relative to the lighthouse feel free to amend, or ... commented 2025-08-16 15:59:28 UTC by Thingummy ♦12 |
| 170526783 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 202) | Priority edits - Revisión completa de atributos de calles, geometrías y otros detalles en Sectores de La Cisterna #Kaart 2025 commented 2025-08-16 15:49:46 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170519423 (Comments: 1) | Djekfhsn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, Geen idee of het kan met organicmaps. Je zou die identieke adresnodes het beste kunnen samenvoegen met de BAG adresnode. Met editor iD en/of JOSM kan het in ieder geval wel. MVG eggie commented 2025-08-16 15:49:16 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170528176 (Comments: 1) | JoostFontijn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Beste Joost. Die accesstags zijn allemaal default en hoef je niet toe te voegen. We voegen alleen de uitzonderingen toe. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170528176 MVG eggie commented 2025-08-16 15:45:43 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170527338 (Comments: 2) | hrsdhsr (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #170529687 commented 2025-08-16 15:43:42 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170524111 (Comments: 1) | DannyBrederoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Geef svp aan wat je hebt toegevoegd. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-16 15:37:13 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170397379 (Comments: 1) | kmiernik (Discussed changesets: 7) | Cześć, czy to na pewno jest `surface=pebblestone`? Bo jest to raczej dość rzadka nawierzchnia i tym bardziej dziwnie to wygląda na podjeździe. Niestety SC ma średnie zdjęcie (już im to zgłosiłem, żeby poprawili, bo ... commented 2025-08-16 15:31:47 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,107 |
| 170476719 (Comments: 1) | jdasmh (Discussed changesets: 13) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855583732 Hey there jdasmh, Thanks for the efforts to clean up golf courses. It's much appreciated. There's a problem with this green (and possibly others). You aren't sharing the nod... commented 2025-08-16 15:17:19 UTC by b-jazz ♦710 |
| 170528307 (Comments: 1) | Xernover (Discussed changesets: 1) | A hídat azért töröltem, mert kiépitett híd nincs commented 2025-08-16 15:16:00 UTC by Xernover ♦1 |
| 170427061 (Comments: 2) | pingsler (Discussed changesets: 46) | Habs korrigiert. War ein typing-Fehler. Danke für den Hinweis! commented 2025-08-16 14:58:13 UTC by pingsler ♦8 |
| 170500042 (Comments: 4) | ikorniachtos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, since the data used Bing Aerial Imagery, they are totally fine and I have reinstated the data with modifications to road access information. However, Esri World Imagery is our aerial imagery of choice because they are often the most recent. |
| 117593513 (Comments: 1) | jyg1093 (Discussed changesets: 9) | JOSM 편집 commented 2025-08-16 14:24:22 UTC by jyg1093 ♦8 |
| 118059566 (Comments: 1) | jyg1093 (Discussed changesets: 9) | JOSM 편집 commented 2025-08-16 14:24:14 UTC by jyg1093 ♦8 |
| 119496854 (Comments: 1) | jyg1093 (Discussed changesets: 9) | JOSM 편집 commented 2025-08-16 14:23:39 UTC by jyg1093 ♦8 |
| 120080972 (Comments: 1) | jyg1093 (Discussed changesets: 9) | JOSM 편집 commented 2025-08-16 14:23:30 UTC by jyg1093 ♦8 |
| 121303123 (Comments: 1) | jyg1093 (Discussed changesets: 9) | JOSM 편집 commented 2025-08-16 14:23:05 UTC by jyg1093 ♦8 |
| 128232090 (Comments: 1) | jyg1093 (Discussed changesets: 9) | JOSM 편집 commented 2025-08-16 14:21:46 UTC by jyg1093 ♦8 |
| 170014020 (Comments: 1) | Adventurize (Discussed changesets: 2) | 你好，下回在删除树木前请先说明为什么删除，否则视为恶意篡改哦！ commented 2025-08-16 14:21:31 UTC by monhiko ♦41 |
| 167961706 (Comments: 7) | GhentTheftAuto (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bump commented 2025-08-16 14:21:04 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦447 |
| 164029012 (Comments: 6) | ERU_Mentz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich habe das jetzt entsprechend umgesetzt. LG Lukas commented 2025-08-16 14:12:07 UTC by Elefant aus Wuppertal ♦11 |
| 170525312 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 202) | Nota resuelta #4911935 commented 2025-08-16 14:11:13 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170525341 (Comments: 2) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 202) | Nota resuelta #4911934 commented 2025-08-16 14:10:29 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170525331 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 202) | Nota resuelta #4911933 commented 2025-08-16 14:10:05 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 170525292 (Comments: 1) | felipeeugenio (Discussed changesets: 202) | Nota resuelta #4911932 commented 2025-08-16 14:09:37 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,441 |
| 167533120 (Comments: 2) | wies1 (Discussed changesets: 126) | Hallo, danke für den Hinweis und die Vornahme des Umzugs des Anwalts. Gruss wies1 commented 2025-08-16 14:02:24 UTC by wies1 ♦154 |
| 170461370 (Comments: 2) | Northeno (Discussed changesets: 19) | Revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170524056 commented 2025-08-16 13:39:25 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,107 |
| 170513499 (Comments: 3) | Fedde89 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Top... denk dat osmand meer iets is voor onderweg.. Mapse eggie commented 2025-08-16 12:34:46 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170371045 (Comments: 5) | MilMapper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Toto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=recreation%20ground by som z tej plochy úplne odstránil a keď má celý ten areál názov, tak by som cca odhadol, že odkiaľ pokiaľ sa nachádza a na... commented 2025-08-16 12:31:23 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170371395 (Comments: 5) | MilMapper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Záleží od toho, čo sa tam nachádza. Pokiaľ sú tam len tabule, tak tourism=information, information=board. Pokiaľ aj nejaké iné atrakcie, tak záleží od toho, aké tam sú atrakci... commented 2025-08-16 12:28:39 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170521070 (Comments: 1) | ziomio (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://www.gazzettadiparma.it/parma/2025/08/16/gallery/via-ximenes-in-arrivo-unaltra-rotatoria-la-quarta-allincrocio-con-strada-budellungo-886036/ commented 2025-08-16 12:26:24 UTC by ziomio ♦12 |
| 167754277 (Comments: 1) | diegoocosta (Discussed changesets: 1) | ciao! ho una domanda, perché campo da gioco? non è forse di più un'area pedonale? perché non ha proprio un utilizzo chiaro questa piastra, è molto misto, anche se maggiormente la usano i bambini e i ragazzi per... commented 2025-08-16 12:13:19 UTC by maeviux ♦2 |
| 163708787 (Comments: 1) | bufferclip (Discussed changesets: 4) | Guten Tag, zwei versehentliche Verschiebungen rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170520029 Viele Grüße whb commented 2025-08-16 12:04:35 UTC by whb ♦619 |
| 170516505 (Comments: 1) | Magda Olaru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The AED needs to be more precisely positioned for folk to find it from an OSM map. OSM data can be correct to within 1 metre. The Big Yellow storage facility is the other side of Holman Road from this AED placemen... commented 2025-08-16 11:59:19 UTC by BCNorwich ♦4,894 |
| 143008767 (Comments: 1) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 169) | CLOSED DUE TO HS2 commented 2025-08-16 11:43:09 UTC by Karl Addison ♦1 |
| 170517404 (Comments: 1) | Djekfhsn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Djekfhsn. Please use the present addressnode.. No space in postcodeformat. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-08-16 11:26:26 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 167322121 (Comments: 3) | nhav (Discussed changesets: 2) | Guten Tag, die Erkundung vor Ort hat ergeben, dass sich das Büro jetzt in der Bergheimer Straße 73 in Heidelberg befindet. Ich habe dies entsprechend verbessert. Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167533120 |
| 119183576 (Comments: 1) | Slava4774 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Предполагаю, что название жилой зоны "д.Куда" было внесено ошибочно, по моим данным деревня с таким названием находится восточнее. С... commented 2025-08-16 11:18:24 UTC by Grass-snake ♦236 |
| 170457417 (Comments: 1) | RFuser11 (Discussed changesets: 54) | building\ttrain_station → transportation с чего вдруг? это здание вокзала commented 2025-08-16 11:06:20 UTC by literan ♦6,752 |
| 147111050 (Comments: 2) | kjon (Discussed changesets: 156) | Hallo Polarbear, öffne doch bitte mal iD und wechsle auf die Hintergrundansicht "Berlin/Geoportal ALKIS". Das habe ich vor einem Jahr auch gemacht und die dort hinterlegten Hausnummern in OSM ergänzt. Der Rest (source=* Tags an... commented 2025-08-16 11:03:16 UTC by kjon ♦75 |
 | 168840173 (Comments: 1) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 165) | I now suddenly understand why Street Complete was asking about building numbers I had sworn I had already contributed. I'll keep that in mind for the future. commented 2025-08-16 10:43:04 UTC by crazycolbster ♦4 |
| 169770364 (Comments: 1) | MikaHakinen (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, when you use highway=construction, please also specify construction=*. In this case construction=primary. commented 2025-08-16 10:32:53 UTC by foreigner037 ♦50 |
| 170348607 (Comments: 2) | opendcc (Discussed changesets: 140) | fixed. Should be ref=KEH-2004 commented 2025-08-16 10:24:26 UTC by opendcc ♦1,541 |
| 170494332 (Comments: 1) | Beniciamiddleschool (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515700 commented 2025-08-16 10:11:32 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170492121 (Comments: 1) | Beniciamiddleschool (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515700 commented 2025-08-16 10:11:32 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170500650 (Comments: 1) | ILoveHypocrisy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279 commented 2025-08-16 10:01:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170499088 (Comments: 1) | Gettingay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279 commented 2025-08-16 10:01:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170499779 (Comments: 1) | ILoveHypocrisy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279 commented 2025-08-16 10:01:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170498319 (Comments: 1) | JAKE TRAN'S 1 FAN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279 commented 2025-08-16 10:01:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170499901 (Comments: 1) | ILoveHypocrisy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279 commented 2025-08-16 10:01:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170500020 (Comments: 1) | ILoveHypocrisy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279 commented 2025-08-16 10:01:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170499416 (Comments: 1) | ILoveHypocrisy (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279 commented 2025-08-16 10:01:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,127 |
| 170353460 (Comments: 1) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:colour colou names should start with small letter. commented 2025-08-16 09:56:35 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170474208 (Comments: 1) | wandering_egg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, is it coffe shop or coffe place? commented 2025-08-16 09:50:54 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170480972 (Comments: 1) | JCI esquadrias de alumínio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-16 09:47:54 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 170485460 (Comments: 1) | Auto Peças Lopes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-16 09:47:33 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 170514484 (Comments: 1) | OrakelOrtelius (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-08-16 09:47:11 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170355263 (Comments: 1) | Bane a štôlne (Discussed changesets: 24) | Zdravím, nabudúce stačí studničku len presunúť (nie je potrebné ju vymazať a vytvoriť novú) ;) commented 2025-08-16 09:45:40 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,006 |
| 170469485 (Comments: 1) | hashi_ibr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that... commented 2025-08-16 09:44:08 UTC by martien-176 ♦340 |
| 170498992 (Comments: 2) | Mapa ambon myśliwskich w Polsce (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nie powinno. Niemal nie modyfikowałem istniejących dróg, dodawałem jedynie nowe. Poza oczywiście node'ami na skrzyżowaniach. Wyjątkiem była droga pożarowa nr 50, która była dotąd zmapowana jako ścieżka. To dosyć... commented 2025-08-16 09:41:49 UTC by Mapa ambon myśliwskich w Polsce ♦1 |
| 170505996 (Comments: 1) | Napatter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-08-16 09:33:07 UTC by Comino ♦118 |
| 166356413 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour, après vérification sur place j'ai annulé ces modifications, le dsc est toujours là. commented 2025-08-16 09:31:58 UTC by Syl ♦980 |
| 170403303 (Comments: 3) | atchisson (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, Merci pour le retour. Je fais la modif. J'ajoute aussi un `access=customers`. Et pas de problème, il n'y a pas d'erreur, on cherche tous à faire au mieux, l'important c'est d'ajouter un pr... commented 2025-08-16 09:30:51 UTC by LudovicG ♦75 |
| 170470737 (Comments: 2) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 88) | Hello, If you want to merge non-homogeneous areas, you must use a type:site relation, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site You cannot use the type:multipolygon relation, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:... commented 2025-08-16 09:30:42 UTC by Map47 ♦39 |
| 170501349 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 76) | Naniesione drogi pożarowe: 42-51 commented 2025-08-16 09:15:39 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦199 |
| 170374544 (Comments: 1) | BELL71 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buongiorno, ho notato che a partire da questo changeset l'area boschiva ad est dell'alta val Seriana è diventata coltivazione erbacea. E' una modifica che mi è già successo di correggere in passato: è ... commented 2025-08-16 08:58:00 UTC by astraspera ♦10 |
| 170512084 (Comments: 1) | k2101 (Discussed changesets: 46) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. "Potok": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13... commented 2025-08-16 08:50:57 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |
| 170511083 (Comments: 4) | Bobdevries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke.... Even CTRL-F5 toetsen.. Soms een paar keer. Dan maak je je cache leeg. Wanneer wegen die er niet meer zijn, maar nog wel herkenbaar zijn op de luchtfoto, kun je ze beter taggen met disused:highway=residential. Dat voorkomt opnieuw intek... commented 2025-08-16 08:40:51 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 165913378 (Comments: 3) | ViewStreet (Discussed changesets: 8) | Community said: ManuelB701 Manuel B. 24 Ιουν I’ll also note that this also depends on how large the curve is. Where the curves are fairly small, you generally draw only one line but where they become ... commented 2025-08-16 08:28:40 UTC by ViewStreet ♦4 |
| 170466362 (Comments: 1) | LFlessa (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Du hattest einen Punkt einer Straße verschoben, das hat bereits ein anderer User mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170505776 bereits korrigiert. (Das wär... commented 2025-08-16 08:14:16 UTC by rempshaener ♦823 |
| 170498022 (Comments: 1) | Mapper9174 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Probeer indien mogelijk bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community |
| 170505773 (Comments: 1) | Dragnets (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback: Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast.. Update zegt niemand iets. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Comm... commented 2025-08-16 07:52:34 UTC by eggie ♦41,079 |
| 170506845 (Comments: 2) | aminkh2060 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975288222#map=16/-33.85097/151.28450 commented 2025-08-16 07:36:03 UTC by nevw ♦2,009 |
| 170386042 (Comments: 1) | Megger97 (Discussed changesets: 1) | "dead_end"? Vermutlich sollten die Namee hier noch einmal angepasst werden. commented 2025-08-16 07:31:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170395997 (Comments: 2) | Valence Supply1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170411674 commented 2025-08-16 07:29:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170402123 (Comments: 1) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 5) | ? commented 2025-08-16 07:26:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170402716 (Comments: 1) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 5) | ? commented 2025-08-16 07:26:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170506266 (Comments: 1) | brianyoo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please note that objects without descriptions are useless if they only have a name. Changes should also be made in a smaller, manageable area. commented 2025-08-16 07:24:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,712 |
| 170441289 (Comments: 4) | OK_SZ (Discussed changesets: 8) | ... eine öffentliche Datenbank ... commented 2025-08-16 07:20:13 UTC by OK_SZ ♦7 |
| 170448118 (Comments: 1) | Agustinbro27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | No queda muy claro si se puede, pareciera que si. Pero cuando volvieron a pintar la flecha sobre el asfalto no volvieron a pintar la que apunta hacia la izquierda: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/kaart_360?lat=-33.478837&lng=-70.6601843&am... commented 2025-08-16 07:13:57 UTC by jptolosa ♦210 |
| 170487792 (Comments: 1) | Matvee (Discussed changesets: 10) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-16 06:54:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170481195 (Comments: 1) | Partizanin (Discussed changesets: 1) | #NameChanges Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names and their map features. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally... commented 2025-08-16 06:53:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170476360 (Comments: 2) | AFRICANA INVASION (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170480478 commented 2025-08-16 06:51:46 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170497493 (Comments: 2) | Sanoi85 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh ups, das war ein versehen commented 2025-08-16 06:48:49 UTC by Sanoi85 ♦1 |
| 170497369 (Comments: 1) | Noel Dederichs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170499361 commented 2025-08-16 06:48:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170497412 (Comments: 1) | Noel Dederichs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170499354 commented 2025-08-16 06:47:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170497480 (Comments: 2) | Noel Dederichs (Discussed changesets: 3) | User account has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18610 commented 2025-08-16 06:47:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170339488 (Comments: 2) | rafalwlo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for your feedback. I fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170508203 commented 2025-08-16 06:43:33 UTC by rafalwlo ♦4 |
| 170452844 (Comments: 3) | OddlyAngled (Discussed changesets: 6) | if the distinction matters, these are often used for days or more as a base camp for day rides, and subjectively much less often (if at all) as a temporary overnight stop on a longer packing trip. commented 2025-08-16 06:39:27 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦107 |
| 170502541 (Comments: 1) | MaxSOON (Discussed changesets: 1) | #NameChange Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more i... commented 2025-08-16 06:31:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,524 |
| 170474687 (Comments: 2) | HC Ahlmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da ist mir ein Eckpunkt zwischen Änderung und Hochladen verloren gegangen. commented 2025-08-16 06:20:51 UTC by HC Ahlmann ♦1 |
| 170440591 (Comments: 3) | TheKegzster (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries, you didn't mess anything up and it wasn't wrong just incomplete, and I was giving you a few tips to make it better next time. If there really was something wrong, I would have gone ahead and fixed it right away :) Thanks for exp... commented 2025-08-16 04:27:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦40 |
| 170363846 (Comments: 5) | TheKegzster (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries, it was a straightforward fix and thanks for the detailed and understanding reply! And its great that you are helping map! I'm a VT alum myself (BA Geography, BS Meteorology '17) exclusively biking everywhere when I was there. La... commented 2025-08-16 04:27:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦40 |
| 170434218 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 52) | And it's a further special case of being on `man_made=bridge` (besides `building=` etc) commented 2025-08-16 04:04:12 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,581 |
| 170465349 (Comments: 5) | Zedmoi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wow - a pole in the middle of the driveway. It doesn't sound useable anymore. Would you mind leaving a changeset comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467479637 to explain to the mapper the issue with the driveway? commented 2025-08-16 02:48:12 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 75838294 (Comments: 1) | aleksaJov (Discussed changesets: 43) | Nice work Alek and co commented 2025-08-16 02:34:13 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦408 |
| 170474807 (Comments: 1) | GenericUser82 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hey GenericUser82 👋🏾. It was nice to see the addresses. I think it would be better to use addr:housenumber along with addr:street or addr:place. commented 2025-08-16 02:26:40 UTC by KhubsuratInsaan ♦21 |
| 170488272 (Comments: 1) | spacewalker77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey spacewalker77 👋🏾. I think it would be probably better to create the park as a closed way rather than a node. You can use a mobile editor like Vespucci for that purpose, since Organic Maps doesn't support that. commented 2025-08-16 02:08:54 UTC by KhubsuratInsaan ♦21 |
| 170486004 (Comments: 1) | kal990 (Discussed changesets: 1) | You actually look like you updated it fairly well. Do you know if it's really a one way? I'm also not sure if the turn restriction is necessary if only emergency access vehicles will be using it. commented 2025-08-16 01:37:41 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦78 |
| 170457577 (Comments: 2) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sure, here are the primary sources I used: Pacific Coast Archeology Society: https://pcas.org/Vol35N4/354Johnson.pdf? County of San Diego (courtesy of Pechanga Band of Indians): https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/pds/ceqa/JVR/Adm... commented 2025-08-16 00:49:44 UTC by Yushclay ♦3 |
| 170478988 (Comments: 1) | JuliNator99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Beat me by 12 hours! commented 2025-08-16 00:35:25 UTC by OpenStreetMapMapper ♦3 |
| 170458930 (Comments: 2) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sure, I can fix that. commented 2025-08-15 23:59:46 UTC by Yushclay ♦3 |
| 170415161 (Comments: 1) | squanchopolis30000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. 576 feet would be really high, but considering that this is in meters, that would be really high! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using... commented 2025-08-15 23:54:12 UTC by Glassman ♦5,319 |
| 170502819 (Comments: 1) | texent (Discussed changesets: 11) | 追記:田中家住宅エリア化と史跡ポイント追加 commented 2025-08-15 23:51:27 UTC by texent ♦11 |
| 170180772 (Comments: 4) | meark (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Meark, You are correct that there are no sharrows northbound, but the data already reflected that prior to your edit with cycleway:right=shared_lane and cycleway:left=no. The southbound shared lane is what Joel restored in the most r... commented 2025-08-15 23:48:06 UTC by nyanpsyche ♦11 |
| 165512327 (Comments: 2) | ViewStreet (Discussed changesets: 8) | I have been there that's why i fixed it. This is a crossroad, not a curve with 2 branches, right? As a driver that I use OSM the shape of the cross represents exactly how is the road that I am about to pass through. The curve of the asp... commented 2025-08-15 23:32:12 UTC by ViewStreet ♦4 |
| 170502419 (Comments: 1) | k2extreme (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-08-15 23:30:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,262 |