| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 184532380 (Comments: 2) | serock (Discussed changesets: 77) | Hola caprieldeluca, no sabía que estaban siendo etiquetando como vandalismo los changesets con comentarios genéricos. Como suelo realizar muchos cambios en un mismo changeset, mis ediciones están orientadas a una revisi&oa... commented 2026-06-25 01:15:33 UTC by serock ♦79 |
 | 176681748 (Comments: 1) | LateNightTone (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350694813/ What does lane_markings=concentric mean? I could understand on a roundabout, but on a bridge? commented 2026-06-25 00:47:31 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,168 |
 | 184493866 (Comments: 6) | Greg Nicholson (Discussed changesets: 1) | I can take care of it; thanks for understanding. I'm okay with leaving the pond-edge trail deleted; it never amounted to much of anything. Cheers. commented 2026-06-25 00:15:19 UTC by Viajero Perdido ♦251 |
| 180269664 (Comments: 5) | ramthelinefeed (Discussed changesets: 64) | Hi again, 1. crossing:island=noy ? :) 2. Is this really a crossing if there is nothing on the far side of the road? commented 2026-06-25 00:07:38 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,168 |
 | 182340876 (Comments: 1) | Arnaud Vanroose (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello, I am afraid to inform you that this edit contains problems. Bistro Servais was already on the map, as a single node. In this edit, you added tags to the building to make it a restaurant too. This creates a problem because ... commented 2026-06-25 00:02:28 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
 | 184334609 (Comments: 2) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 307) | This building is in Australia. You are wrong by about 10,000 miles. Please at least check the country you are mapping in first. commented 2026-06-24 23:45:01 UTC by TheSwavu ♦653 |
| 183993075 (Comments: 1) | JGamerI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello JGamerl, You deleted the power=substation and ref=151S tags from the substation off of the Trans-Canada at George Freeman Trail. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432563285/) I have since fixed it. Please be careful with the changes you... commented 2026-06-24 23:43:12 UTC by hoserab ♦241 |
| 183857251 (Comments: 3) | skittles43 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, I see a faint outline of something on the Esri imagery... I'll trust that this is actually a track. That said, I've deleted the "random motorcross track" name from it. The `name` key is meant for the name of a feature... commented 2026-06-24 23:40:33 UTC by hoserab ♦241 |
 | 181009310 (Comments: 1) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 174) | Hallo Martin, bedankt voor het verwijderen van de algemene access=agricultural op de Beekstraat, want die is niet consistent met de getagde traffic_sign=NL:C12,OB55 : https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/6778425 ... commented 2026-06-24 23:37:21 UTC by multimodaal ♦282 |
 | 184082209 (Comments: 3) | kelobxb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, to w takim razie powinno to być otagowane jako droga dla rowerów. highway=cycleway bez foot=* i bicycle=* :) Warto dodać jakiś note, żeby ktoś przypadkiem nie zmienił, bo jest niestandardowy brak ciągłości commented 2026-06-24 23:33:14 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
 | 181518544 (Comments: 3) | McKulkin (Discussed changesets: 15) | Huh, well, now people have beaten a different path, with a "ladder" out of a tyre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13963443403 commented 2026-06-24 23:23:13 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
 | 184551313 (Comments: 1) | asdasdasdasasda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola- Buenas tardes. Transformó una instalación de faena en un grafiti? Puede aclararnos por favor? porque no se entiende mucho el cambio. gracias --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2026-06-24 23:22:00 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
 | 184485897 (Comments: 18) | 5m4u9 (Discussed changesets: 119) | entrando en la wiki general ES:Bolivia hay un menú de convenciones, ahí el enlace... pero es este -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia/Convenciones/Lugares commented 2026-06-24 23:17:43 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,687 |
| 184547758 (Comments: 1) | timuranium (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello timuranium, Is there a reason why you made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1515566162 an 'inner' part of the "Inglewood Migratory Bird Sanctuary" relation? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20699670) commented 2026-06-24 23:06:33 UTC by hoserab ♦241 |
 | 180086052 (Comments: 1) | Isaac89Costa (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1. Google Maps does not use OpenStreetMap 2. You broke the residential area's polygon commented 2026-06-24 23:00:43 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
 | 184492624 (Comments: 1) | J Sallee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457067104 commented 2026-06-24 23:00:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184508947 (Comments: 1) | Encompass1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-24 22:59:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184509001 (Comments: 1) | Encompass1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-24 22:59:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
 | 184512777 (Comments: 1) | SVARIO73 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-24 22:58:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184512807 (Comments: 1) | SVARIO73 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-24 22:58:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
 | 184517199 (Comments: 1) | Omer_A7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? Bike Only (1236191903), v2 commented 2026-06-24 22:57:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
 | 184431345 (Comments: 1) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 27) | Why place=country? It is "state", no? commented 2026-06-24 22:55:43 UTC by vng_me ♦144 |
| 174131253 (Comments: 2) | Darshan442007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20862 commented 2026-06-24 22:48:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184362929 (Comments: 1) | CameraSpotter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The building shapes look pretty accurate, but you should square them to make them neater. You can square by right clicking the building and clicking the square button, or by pressing Q while the building is sel... commented 2026-06-24 22:05:51 UTC by Justin1234 ♦23 |
 | 184484969 (Comments: 1) | anothergrain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gràcies per millorar les dades d'OSM, anotergrain. Veig que has demanat una revisió: l'edició que has realitzat és correcta. Un millor mapeig consistiria en afegir l'adreça de cada casa en un n... commented 2026-06-24 21:25:30 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,823 |
| 184466034 (Comments: 1) | Nostalgie_Vermessungszeichner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Nostalgie_Vermessungszeichner, ¿Estás seguro que aquí existe una vía ciclista? En la ortofoto actual no se observa ningún camino nuevo para ciclistas. Saludos, Jordi commented 2026-06-24 21:15:10 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,823 |
| 184532325 (Comments: 5) | pepdeb (Discussed changesets: 4) | I removed motor_vehicle and horse=no from the onewaystreet. Those accesstags have nothing to do with oneway=yes. It's oneway=yes will do the job with exception from bicycle .... oneway:bicycle=no So from the south to the north it... commented 2026-06-24 21:06:42 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
 | 184448109 (Comments: 1) | Marton Ádám (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please can you rewrite (inscription) the entire text from the board? https://mapy.com/s/herobedozo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13956047843 I use the name item for the name of the person the board is about, it's easier to find... commented 2026-06-24 20:59:15 UTC by Dodko ♦1,352 |
| 184544868 (Comments: 2) | P_kawa (Discussed changesets: 22) | access=destination nadal może nie być odpowiedni, dlatego usunąłem tagi access=* z dróg na których zmieniłem ten tag - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184545861 commented 2026-06-24 20:54:37 UTC by P_kawa ♦23 |
| 184333745 (Comments: 2) | Cardiff_Electric (Discussed changesets: 40) | Dzięki za czujność. Widzę, że już chyba poprawione. Zbudowali jakiś czas temu DDR obok, więc chodnik jest faktycznie chodnikiem, a nie jakimś tworem. commented 2026-06-24 20:41:03 UTC by Cardiff_Electric ♦10 |
| 184530035 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 220) | I see. Thanks again! commented 2026-06-24 20:25:04 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
 | 167391967 (Comments: 3) | APneunzehn74 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Danke dir commented 2026-06-24 20:16:29 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
 | 184486731 (Comments: 1) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 17) | дубль добавили, уже стоит на территории commented 2026-06-24 20:07:35 UTC by literan ♦7,145 |
 | 184233079 (Comments: 2) | Erich 106 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Durch den Autobahnbau wurde der Zustieg von der Bäuerinnenkapelle zur Burschlwand bzw. zum E5 unmöglich und über die Kiesgrube östlich von Zams umgeleitet (der neue Anstieg wurde von mir bereits eingezeichnet). Der Abstieg von obe... commented 2026-06-24 20:00:08 UTC by Erich 106 ♦1 |
| 184524160 (Comments: 2) | GORLOM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vieni a trovarci su telegram: - Italia: https://t.me/OpenStreetMapItalia - Veneto: https://t.me/osm_veneto commented 2026-06-24 19:51:48 UTC by AndreaDp271 ♦149 |
 | 184477202 (Comments: 1) | vladzour (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вітаю. Виправте помилку в мультиполігоні "Житлова зона" в Калинівці Він. Обл. commented 2026-06-24 19:50:53 UTC by Lewa Todorov ♦3 |
| 184540530 (Comments: 1) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 46) | operator:type=school ? commented 2026-06-24 19:42:37 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
 | 184352186 (Comments: 1) | Ivan_March (Discussed changesets: 1) | Даже если так вы не можете удалять дороги и подобного рода объекты. Надо ставить ворота на дорогу (в виде точек) и статус дороги менять на ... commented 2026-06-24 19:41:40 UTC by iuvi ♦20 |
| 184526826 (Comments: 1) | aibek55 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Definitely not residential; and please do not remove tracktype & surface unless you are sure that the surface has changed. Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184541702 commented 2026-06-24 19:31:03 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| 184392195 (Comments: 2) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ajjjjjjj pewnie przypadkiem musiałem to zrobić, bo miałem w myszce baterie na wyczerpaniu i lekko przycinała i tak pewnei sie przydażyło. Będę bardziej zwracał uwagę na te kwestie. Dzięki za reakcję i naprawę :) commented 2026-06-24 19:29:42 UTC by SENGAM ♦6 |
| 184538060 (Comments: 1) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 7) | Discuta com a comunidade antes de alterar a classificação de vias https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade/67754 Adicione comentário em suas edições para que outros possam entender melhor o que você est... commented 2026-06-24 19:25:48 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,225 |
 | 184335246 (Comments: 2) | Branko Kokanovic (Discussed changesets: 61) | Kad sam bio u Lyri, i dalje je tu gradiliste, provlacio sam se kroz konstrukcije! Nije gotovo commented 2026-06-24 19:19:14 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦358 |
| 184510606 (Comments: 2) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ja oznaczyłem dzisiaj na mapie, że jest brama i ten odcinek drogi jako prywatną. Też mi się wydaję, że ta brama jest tam nielegalnie. commented 2026-06-24 19:18:56 UTC by SENGAM ♦6 |
| 183997680 (Comments: 2) | a1phonse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it -- thanks for the tip! Yes, I try to keep an eye on the area so I will leave it as-is I guess. commented 2026-06-24 19:17:33 UTC by a1phonse ♦1 |
| 184393258 (Comments: 1) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hej, brak tagu access i pochodnych (foot/bicycle/horce/morot_vehicle) jest domyślnie dostępny (yes), więc nie musisz dodawać access do foot/bicycle/horse itp na "yes", bo jest to zbędne commented 2026-06-24 19:17:02 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 179848951 (Comments: 2) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 174) | welk deel bedoel je precies? commented 2026-06-24 19:16:34 UTC by Martin Borsje ♦756 |
| 184510721 (Comments: 1) | empty_child (Discussed changesets: 46) | 😭 commented 2026-06-24 19:02:57 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| 170047685 (Comments: 3) | melaniya_lyft (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for the data. Yeah this is confusing, seems the city has changed their minds on the direction. Just hoping they add signs that direct traffic in the right direction as it would seem due to meadow lane and the possibly private unnamed serv... commented 2026-06-24 18:51:38 UTC by gpserror ♦241 |
 | 184513010 (Comments: 3) | RP Carto (Discussed changesets: 6) | ah oui, bien vu commented 2026-06-24 18:43:15 UTC by LySioS ♦152 |
| 184447833 (Comments: 4) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Ok dzięki za pomoc i wyjaśnienie commented 2026-06-24 18:39:05 UTC by Pawelski44 ♦17 |
 | 184536927 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравей! Коригирах някои тагове: -върнах типа на сградата, в която се помещава HRC Culinary Academy на "Сграда за търговия" и по кадастър(№6... commented 2026-06-24 18:33:02 UTC by Fraxi ♦367 |
| 184502806 (Comments: 1) | Anusha Kodi (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hey, Please be more careful when mapping highways like this one. Upon further inspection, this was actually a footpath disconnected from the road network. Thanks! commented 2026-06-24 18:29:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
| 184538260 (Comments: 1) | SpaceTracer (Discussed changesets: 10) | Correction: Comment is “Added access tag to barrier on Avenida Los Talleres. #adt” Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary commented 2026-06-24 18:29:04 UTC by SpaceTracer ♦9 |
| 183797975 (Comments: 3) | zekintze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hmm ciekawe. Brzmi jak błąd w danych mapowych ZDM, bo w wykazie jest że Beniowska ma około kilometr, czyli tyle by było od Kazimierskiej do skrzyżowania, co by zgadzało się z tym co mówisz. Postaram się im to zgłosić. commented 2026-06-24 18:20:42 UTC by Przecicinek ♦4 |
 | 184518625 (Comments: 1) | doupak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you remove the Turkish name of the road. Official languages of the island are Greek and Turkish. Here we use the ground rule for the names therefore the main name is in greek. Any other name that is a direct translation of said official name ... commented 2026-06-24 18:19:36 UTC by themi97 ♦14 |
| 184538521 (Comments: 1) | thebrad1111 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Imagery used: mapbox, os cadastral parcels, bing commented 2026-06-24 18:18:35 UTC by thebrad1111 ♦20 |
| 184458098 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | I have changed it back here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184502320 commented 2026-06-24 18:16:43 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
 | 184256756 (Comments: 4) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 9) | quoting/correcting myself: > There is semantic/programmatic/visual/... connection from a url=* tag to the name=* tag Obviously, I meant to write that there is NO direct connection from a url=* tag to the name=* tag on the same object... commented 2026-06-24 18:16:28 UTC by Mister Kanister ♦50 |
| 184470963 (Comments: 1) | doupak (Discussed changesets: 2) | Both Ippokratous and Argzroupoleos, soon to be renamed Dimitris Christophias, Avenues are secondary roads. commented 2026-06-24 18:10:04 UTC by themi97 ♦14 |
| 163596308 (Comments: 1) | reigi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, kleiner Hinweis auf diesen Hinweis. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5331120 Genau den Weg hattest du ja in diesem Changeset als disused: markiert. Weisst du mehr dazu? commented 2026-06-24 18:06:13 UTC by qugeb ♦100 |
 | 184498501 (Comments: 2) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 144) | This section is only useful for Chak Cheung St, `=service` Sui Cheung St , and Kiu Ha Rd. Or do you want to consider MOS Rd u-turn for Tai Po Rd Sha Tin? commented 2026-06-24 17:59:19 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,929 |
| 184469409 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo, ich möchte dich bitten, derartige Arbeiten einzustellen. Eventuell muss ich mir zurechnen lassen, dass ich das Problem und die Auswirkungen nicht deutlicher beschrieben habe. Ich kann das nur für Deutschland beurteilen. Du ... commented 2026-06-24 17:56:14 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184468965 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 22) | Wo ist denn der passende Teich dazu? commented 2026-06-24 17:45:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184469077 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 22) | Das wäre dann fire_hydrant:style=wsh commented 2026-06-24 17:44:38 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184469385 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 22) | Pumpe und suction widerspricht sich commented 2026-06-24 17:43:10 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184471121 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 22) | Unwahrscheinlich, dass das ein Unterflurhydrant mit Saugbetrieb ist. commented 2026-06-24 17:39:31 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184513999 (Comments: 2) | Shre_WD (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi flohoff, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-06-24 17:37:44 UTC by Shre_WD ♦8 |
 | 172197707 (Comments: 3) | olehz (Discussed changesets: 213) | Yes, there is an extinct volcano in the middle of Slovakia (and not the only one). It's crater is at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1379027424 . It is no mud geyser. Maybe the node is missing some website or wikipedia link to show the volcano... commented 2026-06-24 17:31:34 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,941 |
| 184034829 (Comments: 2) | yelisey90 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Well, I didn't notice anything extraordinary at that point. Definitely safe for hiking. I don't remember exactly, maybe there are some obstacles for vehicles... But closer to the top the road has definitely been severly damaged by streams, ... commented 2026-06-24 17:30:55 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| 184523169 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hallo, woher weißt du denn, dass der Hydrant fertiggestellt wurde? Viele Grüße commented 2026-06-24 17:27:52 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
 | 182842275 (Comments: 1) | bastien59360 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The value for the key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:country would generally be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaddr%3Acountry%3DCO commented 2026-06-24 17:25:12 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
| 184102102 (Comments: 1) | Masticass (Discussed changesets: 1) | The value for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:country would generally be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:addr:country=IT commented 2026-06-24 17:22:37 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
| 184463586 (Comments: 1) | ParmaCanal (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, the changes introduced are incorrect and must be corrected. The changeset raises warnings in JOSM, which is contrary to what is stated in the task description:https://github.com/osmlab/appledata/issues/34. Please contact the OSM Argentina... commented 2026-06-24 17:21:01 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 183175965 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hier hängt eine man_made=pipeline am Hydranten, die als DN125 ausgelegt ist -wie soll der Hydrant dann nur 100 haben? commented 2026-06-24 17:20:19 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184512839 (Comments: 2) | Zero Latency VR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hartelijk dank! commented 2026-06-24 17:16:11 UTC by Zero Latency VR ♦1 |
| 184511115 (Comments: 1) | ParmaCanal (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, the changes are not correct, and the changeset return warnings in JOSM. Please contact the OSM Argentina community. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto commented 2026-06-24 16:54:31 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184518645 (Comments: 2) | Shre_WD (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi flohoff, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-06-24 16:52:18 UTC by Shre_WD ♦8 |
 | 183881102 (Comments: 1) | bongomebong (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey bongomebong, This is a duplicate of the existing Giant's Grave at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531994955 Make sure to be properly zoomed in when making edits. (Also, make sure the application your using displays existi... commented 2026-06-24 16:51:57 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦721 |
 | 184328953 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:15 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184533274 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 184176173, 184176495, 184177709, 184177963, 184177985, 184178141, 184178230, 184178433, 184181097, 184181936, 184182235, 184183065, 184183957, 184184128, 184184181, 184237957, 184253135, 184... commented 2026-06-24 16:41:15 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184183957 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:15 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184347714 (Comments: 4) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:15 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184401662 (Comments: 4) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:15 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184177985 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:15 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184533745 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 184176173, 184176495, 184177709, 184177963, 184177985, 184178141, 184178230, 184178433, 184181097, 184181936, 184182235, 184183065, 184183957, 184184128, 184184181, 184237957, 184253135, 184... commented 2026-06-24 16:41:15 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184184181 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:14 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184178230 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:14 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184255149 (Comments: 2) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:14 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184255995 (Comments: 2) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:14 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184283037 (Comments: 3) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:14 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184327695 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:14 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184347043 (Comments: 5) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:14 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184354501 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:14 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184328479 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:13 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184237957 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:13 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184344706 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:13 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184448164 (Comments: 3) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:13 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184181097 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:13 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184417785 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:13 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184176173 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:13 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184489094 (Comments: 3) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:12 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184183065 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:12 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184178141 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:12 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184177963 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:12 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184418428 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:12 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184181936 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:12 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184393689 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:11 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184345542 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:11 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184321006 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:11 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184176495 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:11 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184417766 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:11 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184299679 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:11 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184254160 (Comments: 7) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:11 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184401809 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:10 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184178433 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:10 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184415806 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:10 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184299238 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:10 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184329224 (Comments: 3) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:10 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184177709 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:09 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184346707 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:09 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184254648 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:09 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184184128 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:09 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184182235 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:09 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184253135 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:08 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184320986 (Comments: 1) | josm19902026 (Discussed changesets: 45) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184533745, 184533274 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of dubious quality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20861 commented 2026-06-24 16:41:08 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184476554 (Comments: 2) | MSPAN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, danke für die Richtigstellung. Ich werde das gleich korrigieren. commented 2026-06-24 16:37:02 UTC by MSPAN ♦1 |
| 184460694 (Comments: 1) | bolius32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Спасибо! Скажите, медведей в этих краях встретить можно ? Или редко? commented 2026-06-24 16:33:16 UTC by iuvi ♦20 |
| 184487504 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM17 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Здравствуйте! Ошибка исправлена, проработаем вопрос с участником. commented 2026-06-24 16:30:22 UTC by geo_ozon ♦30 |
| 184519265 (Comments: 12) | pepdeb (Discussed changesets: 4) | It;s allowed to drive wirh a car from the south to the north? In that case don't tag motor_vehicle=no commented 2026-06-24 16:29:23 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184483431 (Comments: 2) | tx94 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Tienes razón, ese tag no parece tener uso. Voy a corregirlo. commented 2026-06-24 16:24:19 UTC by tx94 ♦2 |
| 184519561 (Comments: 1) | SatoruGojoN1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-24 16:23:30 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 180135368 (Comments: 5) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 37) | Thank you for doing that :) commented 2026-06-24 16:23:17 UTC by UKChris ♦49 |
| 184494544 (Comments: 1) | SirAdams (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1thOLmiWwDvl3JcUwPPCHAHeFhJc_ujtw?usp=sharing Dokumenty z przetargu pokazujące drogę po przebudowie! commented 2026-06-24 16:22:50 UTC by SirAdams ♦1 |
| 184521029 (Comments: 1) | SatoruGojoN1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Info samengevoegd. Svp geen spaties in postcode. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-24 16:22:44 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184519949 (Comments: 2) | Jonas_OSI (Discussed changesets: 4) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar een adresnode. commented 2026-06-24 16:21:48 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 183438067 (Comments: 2) | Max1234-ITA (Discussed changesets: 13) | Grazie per la segnalazione! Ora sono in fuga (giusto per restare in tema di bici :-) ) però appena ho maniera sistemo! commented 2026-06-24 16:21:11 UTC by Max1234-ITA ♦18 |
| 184468398 (Comments: 1) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 112) | Hello, I think we do not map the N-10 road as a dual carriageway (at coordinates 47.714035,1.014215), if there is no physical separation between the carriageways. Please see osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway for more information. If the road was recently con... commented 2026-06-24 16:20:44 UTC by ika-chan! ♦405 |
| 184521259 (Comments: 1) | SatoruGojoN1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. gr eggie commented 2026-06-24 16:20:09 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184522881 (Comments: 1) | BouncingBart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-24 16:17:55 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184523107 (Comments: 1) | tiejo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wanneer je er echt niet mag fietsen lijkt het me oke. Wanneer het Eigenterrein is kun je beter foot=permissive taggen. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-24 16:17:20 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184524162 (Comments: 1) | Ekin-b (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik heb een algemene companytag toegevoegd. Je ziet anders geen naam. Landnaam hoeft niet en hoort ook niet Netherlands te zijn. Ik heb Netherlands verwijderd en al die naammogelijkheden.. Alleen name= behouden. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-24 16:12:56 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184527855 (Comments: 1) | B Berlee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag B Berlee. Je hebt een pad verwijderd op de begraafplaats. Waarom? MVG eggie commented 2026-06-24 16:09:27 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184524895 (Comments: 2) | B Berlee (Discussed changesets: 2) | De info heb ik verplaatst en garagetag toegevoegd commented 2026-06-24 16:05:37 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 158292312 (Comments: 5) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 400) | aangepast commented 2026-06-24 16:03:53 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184526837 (Comments: 2) | Armaaan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Het is oke zo MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-24 16:02:28 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184419905 (Comments: 3) | Blum agradblue (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo! OK .. gehen wir mal davon aus, du hast das alles dort erfragt und nichts von urheberrechtlich geschützten Plänen übernommen (dann solltest du Quellenangaben besser ändern und dementsprechend anpassen – das ist ... commented 2026-06-24 16:00:46 UTC by goodidea ♦135 |
| 180906808 (Comments: 4) | McKulkin (Discussed changesets: 15) | `historic=vehicle` is exactly what I was looking for. Could not have been a better suggestion! Thanks. commented 2026-06-24 16:00:25 UTC by McKulkin ♦44 |
| 184531131 (Comments: 1) | pepdeb (Discussed changesets: 4) | That had no use.. I removed the duplicated way and tagged the exceptiontag oneway:bicycle=no motor_vehicle=no is wrong anyway. commented 2026-06-24 16:00:09 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184519021 (Comments: 2) | Graf-Karto (Discussed changesets: 10) | building=hospital wieder hinzugefügt. commented 2026-06-24 15:58:31 UTC by Graf-Karto ♦4 |
| 145982619 (Comments: 1) | Teddy73 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Guten Tag, bist du dir sicher, dass die Umbenennung der Gustav-Nachtigal-Straße in Lettow-Vorbeck-Straße richtig ist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32005862/history Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5359626 ... commented 2026-06-24 15:51:02 UTC by whb ♦656 |
| 182624646 (Comments: 1) | CS2100 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi CS2100, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471468834 here you changed bicycle from yes to yesN. Where you trying to add "no"? Or is just a typo and is still yes? commented 2026-06-24 15:48:39 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,906 |
| 184483862 (Comments: 1) | Luizfgf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ola Luizfgf, if the hours are the same for every kind of transport, would be easier to just add one "access:conditional=no @ (Th 03:00-16:00)"? thanks and good mapping commented 2026-06-24 15:47:30 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,906 |
| 184530796 (Comments: 1) | pepdeb (Discussed changesets: 4) | This is a duplicated way. Just remove it. Tag the existing road commented 2026-06-24 15:46:59 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184421459 (Comments: 3) | Blum agradblue (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo! Danke für die ausführlichen Erläuterungen! Ja, das schafft die Öffentlichkeit, die hier auch etwas gefehlt hat … Jetzt erklärt sich mir auch, warum es einen User „Optiml“ gibt (ist das noch je... commented 2026-06-24 15:43:59 UTC by goodidea ♦135 |
 | 184530769 (Comments: 1) | B252697 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Official source from NParks which I referenced: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/parks-docs/springleaf-nature-park/springleaf-nature-park-map.pdf commented 2026-06-24 15:41:02 UTC by B252697 ♦51 |
| 173777696 (Comments: 1) | Peter Robbins (Discussed changesets: 3) | What problems did you fix, it's not rendering like it is on the National Map anymore, it was before commented 2026-06-24 15:40:22 UTC by wwhide ♦12 |
| 184452053 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 72) | Also, in my experience, most mappers frown on the idea of mapping landuse as multipolygons with shared ways in between. You might consider just creating single ways for each landuse area. commented 2026-06-24 15:38:06 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦34 |
| 183781053 (Comments: 2) | proud_user (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin, Es ist die 11. commented 2026-06-24 15:34:42 UTC by proud_user ♦1 |
| 184484522 (Comments: 2) | olehz (Discussed changesets: 213) | Thank you for the feedback. Regarding the changeset description — since I'm consistently mapping a limited set of airport features (runways, taxiways, aprons, hangars, etc.) following a schema close to AMDB, the descriptions natural... commented 2026-06-24 15:33:34 UTC by olehz ♦403 |
| 184528874 (Comments: 2) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 120) | poprawiłem commented 2026-06-24 15:29:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184525850 (Comments: 1) | Sol Elizabeth Riehme (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por colaborar con el mapa! Revisé el conjunto de cambios, habían edificios con paredes que los atravesaban, hice las correcciones. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto commented 2026-06-24 15:29:20 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184518035 (Comments: 5) | mrH3nk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thx... Ik had alleen met mn mobiel gescreend. Beetje ruzie met de wifi. commented 2026-06-24 15:29:01 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 183653760 (Comments: 1) | Iggy Netherfire (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13910154674/history has access = private11 that was added in this edit What this tag means? This access value is unusual commented 2026-06-24 15:24:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
 | 184523548 (Comments: 1) | Jesper Dall (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531970566 commented 2026-06-24 15:20:29 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,852 |
| 184477845 (Comments: 2) | Optiml (Discussed changesets: 3) | Guten Tag, Ich habe den building:part=* Tag wieder entfernt. commented 2026-06-24 15:14:01 UTC by Optiml ♦3 |
| 182693067 (Comments: 2) | Takuto (Discussed changesets: 20) | Привет. Я маплю в Брянске в основном потому, что домики, которые когда-то кто-то накопипастил как попало, меня раздражают. К сожалению, не ... commented 2026-06-24 15:12:30 UTC by Takuto ♦51 |
| 168179897 (Comments: 10) | Saintry17 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the info. I'll have to drop back and fill in a couple "gated" communities that I avoided. commented 2026-06-24 15:05:55 UTC by Saintry17 ♦3 |
| 184525127 (Comments: 1) | STMIKPLK GROUP GIS 26_004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Koreksi data salah input commented 2026-06-24 15:05:15 UTC by STMIKPLK GROUP GIS 26_004 ♦1 |
| 184479126 (Comments: 2) | Getpin_Com (Discussed changesets: 17) | Вітаю! Сьогодні перевіримо всі графіки та виправимо commented 2026-06-24 15:04:42 UTC by Getpin_Com ♦10 |
| 184023744 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 62) | Ciao, ho visto che hai già corretto tu. grazie ;) commented 2026-06-24 14:58:58 UTC by f_gonella ♦64 |
| 170391755 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 62) | Ciao @Wilhem275 fatto revert delle strade modificate in questo changeset con il nuovo Changeset 184528394 tuttavia non mi risultano precedenti commenti tuoi, magari erano su changeset di qualche altro editor. commented 2026-06-24 14:58:11 UTC by f_gonella ♦64 |
| 184526241 (Comments: 1) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 80) | Path re-adjusted to access=destination bycicles=no. Last changeset 184528328 commented 2026-06-24 14:55:34 UTC by Access Claims (komoot) ♦71 |
| 182267146 (Comments: 2) | ravenfeld (Discussed changesets: 11) | C'est de ma faute, j'ai eu une période ou les lames pour moi était pour tout le monde. Du coup lame ne veut pas dire indication aussi pour le VTT ou la raquette même si c'est utilisé ? commented 2026-06-24 14:48:48 UTC by ravenfeld ♦13 |
 | 184512502 (Comments: 1) | MosheMadlan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, יעל רום street is pretty far from this point, are you sure that it is correct address? Or maybe the street here is misnamed? commented 2026-06-24 14:45:37 UTC by Sanniu ♦673 |
 | 184417898 (Comments: 1) | DOR ATZMON (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446217480 from in-construction to completed without fixing nearby roads. Are you sure that this round about is finished? If so, please connect it to roads around it. commented 2026-06-24 14:42:46 UTC by Sanniu ♦673 |
| 184250998 (Comments: 1) | Leon K (Discussed changesets: 47) | Thanks for editing osm commented 2026-06-24 14:39:51 UTC by thebeastmodo1 ♦16 |
| 176014631 (Comments: 3) | COST CUTTERS at Webster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184526951 https://osm.org/changeset/184526951 commented 2026-06-24 14:25:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176048510 (Comments: 2) | COST CUTTERS at Rochester (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184526912 https://osm.org/changeset/184526912 commented 2026-06-24 14:25:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176003075 (Comments: 3) | COST CUTTERS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184526863 https://osm.org/changeset/184526863 commented 2026-06-24 14:24:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 166603236 (Comments: 1) | zabdiel (Discussed changesets: 3) | I don't suppose anybody knows why this fence was constructed blocking the ability to go through? commented 2026-06-24 14:22:36 UTC by 373838484 ♦1 |
| 91836151 (Comments: 1) | jreconenv (Discussed changesets: 3) | This change is of course nonsense; you had it correct before. Fixed in changeset 184526654 https://osm.org/changeset/184526654 commented 2026-06-24 14:21:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 91835625 (Comments: 1) | jreconenv (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cleaned up SEO spam tagging in changeset 184526654 https://osm.org/changeset/184526654 commented 2026-06-24 14:20:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 91835077 (Comments: 1) | jreconenv (Discussed changesets: 3) | An office building is building=office (as is already tagged on the deprecated building_type=*). Fixed in changeset 184526654 https://osm.org/changeset/184526654 commented 2026-06-24 14:19:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 153990433 (Comments: 2) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 47) | Sorry for not replying and removed the relation 500kV Transmission Network without consensus. Now I will readd it again. commented 2026-06-24 14:17:50 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦37 |
| 184471692 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM7 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Здравствуйте! Извините, не заметила. Буду внимательнее. commented 2026-06-24 14:12:54 UTC by Ozon OSM7 ♦6 |
| 122786818 (Comments: 1) | janeeengelman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184526153 https://osm.org/changeset/184526153 commented 2026-06-24 14:10:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182244032 (Comments: 3) | ilia091091 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello TrickyFoxy, thank you for your feedback and local guidance. I initially thought it would be better to revert the names rather than deleting them. Thank you very much for sharing the local context and validating the removal. commented 2026-06-24 14:10:06 UTC by ajmat ♦224 |
| 184524978 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 84) | Updating state truck designated routes #OptimoRoute commented 2026-06-24 14:06:49 UTC by JakovBušić ♦81 |
| 175972037 (Comments: 3) | Mission Valley Towing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tagging for POI in changeset 184525848 https://osm.org/changeset/184525848 commented 2026-06-24 14:04:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176467695 (Comments: 3) | Thousand Hills Coffee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tagging for POI in changeset 184525582 https://osm.org/changeset/184525582 commented 2026-06-24 13:59:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 175699439 (Comments: 3) | Growing Minds Daycare & Learning Center (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184525542 https://osm.org/changeset/184525542 commented 2026-06-24 13:58:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 121347503 (Comments: 1) | Rescue Clean Boca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values that was added back after being cleaned up, in changeset 184525483 https://osm.org/changeset/184525483 commented 2026-06-24 13:57:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184515948 (Comments: 5) | staka-RBK_04 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ah - mist - mein Fehler - stimmt - andere changeset - TomTom kaputtrepariert commented 2026-06-24 13:57:06 UTC by flohoff ♦2,498 |
| 153583356 (Comments: 1) | use_net (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć te zmiany są niestety niepoprawne. Jeśli są to CPRy (ciągy pieszo-rowerowe), to powinno być to highway=path a nie highway=cycleway: Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki jak tagować infrastrukturę rowerową: https... commented 2026-06-24 13:56:32 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 173346544 (Comments: 1) | Rescue Clean 911 West Palm Beach (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values that was added back after being cleaned up, in changeset 184525430 https://osm.org/changeset/184525430 commented 2026-06-24 13:56:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 120987996 (Comments: 1) | Rescue Clean 911 West Palm Beach (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values that was added back after being cleaned up, in changeset 184525430 https://osm.org/changeset/184525430 commented 2026-06-24 13:56:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 174686392 (Comments: 1) | RC911 Wellington (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values that was added back after being cleaned up, in changeset 184525372 https://osm.org/changeset/184525372 commented 2026-06-24 13:55:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 105035880 (Comments: 1) | rescueclean (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values that was added back after being cleaned up, in changeset 184525372 https://osm.org/changeset/184525372 commented 2026-06-24 13:54:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 167693453 (Comments: 1) | Rescue Clean 911 CS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values in changeset 184525173 https://osm.org/changeset/184525173 commented 2026-06-24 13:51:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 120983861 (Comments: 1) | Rescue Clean 911 CS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values in changeset 184525173 https://osm.org/changeset/184525173 commented 2026-06-24 13:51:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 148053271 (Comments: 1) | kdrflrealty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values in changeset 184525173 https://osm.org/changeset/184525173 commented 2026-06-24 13:50:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184517245 (Comments: 1) | Expert PDR - naprawa wgnieceń | usuwanie wgniotek | naprawa po gradobiciu Lublin (Discussed changesets: 1) | OSM to nie banner reklamowy! commented 2026-06-24 13:46:30 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦958 |
| 184472146 (Comments: 2) | Ropino (Discussed changesets: 211) | Hallo, sollte wieder da sein, war ein Fehler meinerseits. Der Wald sollte nicht verschwinden... Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2026-06-24 13:44:11 UTC by Ropino ♦418 |
| 175785172 (Comments: 3) | DavidStar Home Care (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184524623 https://osm.org/changeset/184524623 commented 2026-06-24 13:39:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177216511 (Comments: 1) | krawieck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Cześć, nie rozdzielamy CPRów w ten sposób. Rekomendowanym sposobem tagowania ciągów pieszo-rowerowych jest 1 linia z odpowiednim segregated=yes/no, o ile nie ma tam fizycznej bariery, która realnie blokuje... commented 2026-06-24 13:38:24 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 155599111 (Comments: 1) | Nazom (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, du hast zahlreiche Straßen im Stadtgebiet von Steyregg fälschlicherweise von "residential" auf "unclassified" oder "service" geändert? Was war der Grund dafür? Kannst du sämtliche bitte w... commented 2026-06-24 13:34:18 UTC by PPete2 ♦166 |
| 184461851 (Comments: 1) | goodidea (Discussed changesets: 32) | Mein changeset Kommentar stimmt hier nicht (ein Versehen), das waren Änderungen in der City ... commented 2026-06-24 13:34:07 UTC by goodidea ♦135 |
| 176000508 (Comments: 2) | Matik7 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cześć, takie rozdzielanie jest niepoprawne. W dodatku powstał teraz duplikat – błędnie otagowany CPR + chodnik obok. Ciągi pieszo-rowerowe bez fizycznego rozdzielenia (np. pas zieleni, lub inna bariera) mapujemy jedną li... commented 2026-06-24 13:25:12 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 175649892 (Comments: 3) | New Vision Property Enterprises LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tagging for POI in changeset 184523877 https://osm.org/changeset/184523877 commented 2026-06-24 13:24:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184466031 (Comments: 1) | PouleNoire (Discussed changesets: 6) | salut, tes area=yes sur les zones résidentielles servent à quoi ? Cordialement commented 2026-06-24 13:22:31 UTC by Yunan973 ♦124 |
| 175608473 (Comments: 4) | First Avenue Apartments - Historic District (Discussed changesets: 1) | Disregard previous comment; made it on the wrong changeset (actually refers to changeset 175581068 https://osm.org/changeset/175581068 ) Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tagging for POI in changeset 184523750 https://osm.org/changeset/1845... commented 2026-06-24 13:22:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 175581068 (Comments: 3) | Bing Zaremba Handyman and Construction of Charlotte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding likely nonexistent SEO spam POI with source of Google Maps, located in a parking garage, with an expired website and profiles, in changeset 184523582 https://osm.org/changeset/84523582 commented 2026-06-24 13:18:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184432725 (Comments: 3) | Robert Skiba (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo Robert, Meinst die Auffahrt beim "Im Wiesegrund" ? Ich bin die Strecke am 1.6.2026 Richtung Ramersbach mit dem Bus abgefahren. Ich habe nochmals in meine Trackingdatei geschaut. Der Bus ist dort lang gefahren: L83 - In der Strut... commented 2026-06-24 13:15:06 UTC by bernward1 ♦43 |
| 175214960 (Comments: 4) | Angels Haven Care Murrieta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising, malformed tags and a source of Google Maps, located at a private home with no likely POI verifiable on the ground, in changeset 184523341 https://osm.org/changeset/184523341 commented 2026-06-24 13:13:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 175146470 (Comments: 4) | Angels Haven Care Care - Rancho Mirage (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising, malformed tags and a source of Google Maps, located at a private home with no likely POI verifiable on the ground, in changeset 184523293 https://osm.org/changeset/184523293 commented 2026-06-24 13:12:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 175302251 (Comments: 3) | Angels Haven Care Lake Elsinore California (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising, malformed tags and a source of Google Maps, located at a private home with no likely POI verifiable on the ground in changeset 184523248 https://osm.org/changeset/184523248 commented 2026-06-24 13:11:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184292917 (Comments: 3) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 7) | I removed the fake point in changeset 184522799. commented 2026-06-24 13:09:27 UTC by Marcilio Farias ♦2 |
| 184522799 (Comments: 1) | Marcilio Farias (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed fake/meme POI created in changeset 184292917. The name was not real/verifiable. commented 2026-06-24 13:08:31 UTC by Marcilio Farias ♦2 |
| 175508129 (Comments: 3) | hhofmeisterplumbing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184522874 https://osm.org/changeset/184522874 commented 2026-06-24 13:03:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184508379 (Comments: 4) | Miguel Iovino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Scusami se ti sono sembrato brusco, non era mia intenzione; in questo periodo sto controllando i nuovi utenti e quando trovo qualcosa di strano provo a a scrivere un commento (nella stragrande maggioranza dei casi non ricevo alcuna risposta!). Staser... commented 2026-06-24 12:56:55 UTC by MarcoR ♦600 |
| 175497193 (Comments: 3) | United Sewer and Septic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI "United Sewer and Septic", with blatant advertising and malformed tags and source of Google Maps, at apparent residential location with no apparent POI verifiable on the ground in changeset 184522541 http... commented 2026-06-24 12:56:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 175488015 (Comments: 3) | Scout Septic Grease Drain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184522239 https://osm.org/changeset/184522239 commented 2026-06-24 12:49:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 78423683 (Comments: 1) | A Vos Cartes - Imports (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755582565/history what is the point of this line? commented 2026-06-24 12:48:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 175464237 (Comments: 3) | Prime Septic LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184522154 https://osm.org/changeset/184522154 commented 2026-06-24 12:47:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184213838 (Comments: 4) | tiejo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks, ik zal beter naar de tagging kijken. Ik zat er met de mindset van een fietser in en daar mag je niet zomaar fietsen, maar dat komt inderdaad omdat het niet de bedoeling is dat jan en alleman daar dat terrein opfietst.. Dank voor de feedback. commented 2026-06-24 12:42:16 UTC by tiejo ♦1 |
| 183914154 (Comments: 1) | Mon Agence (Discussed changesets: 24) | Fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184521600 ; please also don't use promotional changeset description , that change nothing to your seo attempt and it's not how OSM work. commented 2026-06-24 12:35:47 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦141 |
| 182037119 (Comments: 2) | temmie18 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Cela a dû se passer quand j'ai changé le nom de l'enseigne sur StreetComplete, je n'ai donc pas effectué de modifications sur pc. Une amie m'a suggéré que cela est automatique lorsque ... commented 2026-06-24 12:30:55 UTC by temmie18 ♦2 |
| 184520396 (Comments: 1) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 48) | Waarom verander je de shrubbery naar scrub? Dit stond al goed gemapt... Ik heb het weer teruggezet. commented 2026-06-24 12:23:03 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦61 |
 | 183641568 (Comments: 2) | APizich (Discussed changesets: 1) | PS: Es izveidoju problēmas ziņojumu GitHub repozitorijā, kas veltīts piena kannu statīvu kartēm. Vai varētu to, lūdzu, apskatīt? / I opened an issue on the milk churn stand map GitHub repository. Could you take a look, please? http... commented 2026-06-24 12:18:17 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦721 |
| 167597718 (Comments: 2) | ptrider (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi @ptrider, non relation polygon doesn't use type=* tag commented 2026-06-24 12:12:42 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184140950 (Comments: 2) | Peter_v_Aalst (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Michael, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe bereits begonnen die neu von mir erstellten Einträge, die sich auf Nomady und Alpaca stützen zu löschen. Hier habe ich als Quellen park4night und Bing verwendet. Beide Quellen w&uu... commented 2026-06-24 12:09:19 UTC by Peter_v_Aalst ♦4 |
 | 184520291 (Comments: 1) | andrewwka (Discussed changesets: 3) | Andijan* commented 2026-06-24 12:04:40 UTC by andrewwka ♦3 |
 | 184519122 (Comments: 3) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Leia as mensagens privadas enviadas sobre este assunto commented 2026-06-24 11:56:14 UTC by PL 2188677 ♦4 |
| 184502975 (Comments: 3) | pitfire (Discussed changesets: 41) | Deine änderung ist aufgefallen weil sie in meiner Routenüberwachung zu veränderten Zeiten/Distanzen geführt hat: https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1293594,1294615#50.74405,7.23537,16z Gepart mit dem Changeset kommentar ... commented 2026-06-24 11:55:48 UTC by flohoff ♦2,498 |
| 183959103 (Comments: 5) | eretyhh (Discussed changesets: 17) | So let the locals write new names for the objects. Because Soviet names of neighborhoods, especially in honor of those who carried out repressions, should not be on the map of a city that is constantly being bombed. commented 2026-06-24 11:55:24 UTC by eretyhh ♦1 |
| 183968657 (Comments: 1) | Laptobi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das ist nicht korrekt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/999972327 (da es auch nur temporär ist, wird es nur nicht angezeigt. - außer hier: https://greymiche.lima-city.de/xmas/ ) Nebenbei: Ich werde auch das "Rock im ... commented 2026-06-24 11:54:49 UTC by pyram ♦527 |
| 184515768 (Comments: 3) | onelectrical (Discussed changesets: 1) | Another mapper has changed the addr:street to Elizabeth Ave and I agree with that change as we are mapping street addresses. Are you the owner? I wonder if the postal address uses Elizabeth Ave. By the way, we do not have permission to use Google ... commented 2026-06-24 11:48:03 UTC by nevw ♦2,245 |
| 184475445 (Comments: 1) | rexcom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184475034 commented 2026-06-24 11:30:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦534 |
 | 184462513 (Comments: 1) | Tokiko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184518968 commented 2026-06-24 11:25:19 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 164026952 (Comments: 2) | -Utiashvili (Discussed changesets: 5) | Same with: node/12696335189 node/12696335187 Thanks. commented 2026-06-24 11:22:26 UTC by McKulkin ♦44 |
| 184388979 (Comments: 2) | pochini (Discussed changesets: 1) | I added a drinking water point and a short road. I rerouted the Graveglia stream because it was very far from the satellite image in some points and it passed through a building. I slightly changed some paths to make them match the satellite image be... commented 2026-06-24 11:19:30 UTC by pochini ♦2 |
| 184514852 (Comments: 1) | CamyAnush (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé el conjunto de cambios, hice algunas correcciones. Si están en la zona y pueden contactarse con la comunidad OSM por Telegram o el foro: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentin... commented 2026-06-24 11:11:07 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184440636 (Comments: 2) | terkepesz90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Megcsináltam helyetted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184518234 commented 2026-06-24 11:09:06 UTC by qstep ♦123 |
| 184517871 (Comments: 1) | Ekin-b (Discussed changesets: 3) | In ieder geval neutraal. Inkorten zou nog kunnen. De wesite is eigenlijk bedoeld voor info over het bedrijf. Mvg eggie commented 2026-06-24 11:02:11 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184464380 (Comments: 2) | santon (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hallo aufachse, prima, du bist offensichtlich jemand, der dort öfter ist. Ich war gerade im Urlaub dort und war nicht begeistert, wie das eingetragen ist. Siehe der Hinweis 5348563 in der Mitte des Steinbruchs. Was ist nicht mehr aktuell? Bet... commented 2026-06-24 11:01:48 UTC by santon ♦44 |
| 184385432 (Comments: 5) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 161) | Aha, I had suspected there must be more signs to the North but I hadn't spotted them. It all looks right from the Overpass query. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... commented 2026-06-24 10:56:29 UTC by iMacThere4iAm ♦13 |
 | 183199343 (Comments: 1) | CX_01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您好，变更注释要写细一点，然后请您不要随意删除并重新添加道路，这样会损坏公交关系，谢谢。 commented 2026-06-24 10:51:46 UTC by hahae ♦33 |
 | 184278166 (Comments: 1) | Pachara Clinic (Discussed changesets: 1) | มีคลินิกของฉัน ชื่อว่า พชรคลินิก สาขาหางดง Pachara Clinic Hang Dong ตรงนี้ช่วยปักหมุดจริงให้ด้วย commented 2026-06-24 10:49:06 UTC by Pachara Clinic ♦1 |
| 136609407 (Comments: 5) | Mappin' Jack Flash (Discussed changesets: 30) | cool that my failed nitpicking prompted some local surveying :) have a nice day! commented 2026-06-24 10:47:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184516895 (Comments: 1) | Ekin-b (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. ..name=... is voldoende. De description op deze manier hoort neutraal te zijn. Dat is hij nu niet. Svp aanpassen naar een korte neutrale beschrijving. Mvg, eggie Validator commented 2026-06-24 10:42:12 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184240747 (Comments: 3) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 174) | De bijlage betreft de bebordingstekeningen deelgebieden. commented 2026-06-24 10:36:22 UTC by Martin Borsje ♦756 |
| 184413057 (Comments: 1) | ちきゅうぎです (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184517115 commented 2026-06-24 10:34:47 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 184514300 (Comments: 1) | matty817 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531887643 be called Denham Wheel, or should Denham Wheel be a locality? https://redrosecollections.lancashire.gov.uk/view-item?key=SXsiUCI6eyJ2YWx1ZSI6InJpdmVycyBpbiBzcGF0ZSIsIm9wZXJhdG9yIjoxLCJmdXp6eV... commented 2026-06-24 10:33:36 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,066 |
| 184309930 (Comments: 1) | aboc (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bus lines rerouted commented 2026-06-24 10:31:39 UTC by adamos ♦67 |
| 115179030 (Comments: 2) | eumiro (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hi, why you put here way/1004772185 sidewalk=no? I am solving this for more ways now and this one seems to me as a way with separate sidewalk... commented 2026-06-24 10:29:47 UTC by Tomas_J ♦380 |
| 184515411 (Comments: 1) | Sebasawk (Discussed changesets: 20) | What's the reasoning behind the removal of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway from these access roads? commented 2026-06-24 10:00:15 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
 | 184483917 (Comments: 1) | Căprar Andrei (Discussed changesets: 8) | Salut. Bing imagery sunt cele mai proaste si cele mai vechi imagini de pe jud Constanta. Ai inlocuit cladiri recente care au alt shape cu unele vechi de acum vreo 10 ani. Te rog verifica inainte care imagini sunt mai noi si aici trebuiesc si recentra... commented 2026-06-24 09:58:37 UTC by rarad74 ♦523 |
| 184482782 (Comments: 5) | CESHuet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag CES Huet. Oke... Ik heb alleen dat stukje aangepast dat naar de hoofdrijbaan loopt anders kun je nooit op dat vvc pad komen. Ook de oversteek op de openbareweg heb ik van private gehaald. Het routeerde anders echt niet voor wandelaars. ... commented 2026-06-24 09:46:26 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184512962 (Comments: 1) | Mon Agence (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello, We had tried to get in touch with you multiple times to explain the problem caused by those SEO edits. You have repeatedly ignored all our suggestions and kept on editing. Please do not misuse OSM for a promotional platfor... commented 2026-06-24 09:44:31 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 168542328 (Comments: 1) | smeòrach (Discussed changesets: 80) | Hello smeòrach. In this changeset you added 'content=water' to a few nodes named 'well' but mapped as storage tanks. I'm trying to establish is these are operating water wells. Do you remember observing that these were... commented 2026-06-24 09:41:24 UTC by jambamkin ♦86 |
| 184514264 (Comments: 1) | thebrad1111 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Used mapbox imagery, cadastral parcels with a bit of bing imagery for checking. Forgot to add source tag commented 2026-06-24 09:27:32 UTC by thebrad1111 ♦20 |
| 184472978 (Comments: 3) | MicDK (Discussed changesets: 73) | Her er planen, så kan du jo gøre arbejdet færdig: https://fyens.dk/trafik/om-faa-dage-lukker-sidegader-paa-omstridt-straekning-beboere-og-butikker-har-faaet-detaljeret-brev commented 2026-06-24 09:23:18 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,852 |
| 183691922 (Comments: 9) | Danila Scelzo (Discussed changesets: 3) | I created it directly at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13961838365 commented 2026-06-24 09:20:52 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
| 184475421 (Comments: 1) | Ing Guillermo Perez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184514026 commented 2026-06-24 09:17:56 UTC by MappingMore ♦534 |
| 184422658 (Comments: 2) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hello PL 2188677, Thank you for reaching out and providing this important local context. To clarify, we partially reverted the changeset to clean up a duplicate highway geometry at coordinates (39.2254464, -8.8217641). Regarding the del... commented 2026-06-24 09:12:39 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
| 184511794 (Comments: 2) | daeproductions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedrijfstag toegevoegd commented 2026-06-24 09:11:48 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184485311 (Comments: 1) | soflor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Your boundary shows it's broken in OSMI... https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.73721&lat=43.27779&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cdupli... commented 2026-06-24 09:11:31 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,507 |
| 184412110 (Comments: 2) | Luiyo (Discussed changesets: 7) | You are totally right, I can make mistakes but I use an English name for name when the name in English (see Luckin Coffee examples) is the most visible in the store/location. Even if EN is not the official language. commented 2026-06-24 09:11:08 UTC by Luiyo ♦9 |
| 174853101 (Comments: 1) | lil hike (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't add duplicate objects to the map. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element commented 2026-06-24 09:10:13 UTC by Joel Koen ♦7 |
| 184513570 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 59) | https://myvalleynews.com/blog/2026/01/17/murrieta-schedules-hearing-on-proposed-sparkman-drive-name-change/ commented 2026-06-24 09:07:52 UTC by ieguy3 ♦59 |
| 184510259 (Comments: 1) | Scourge1976 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Guck dir die änderung nochmal an - Du hast an stellen wo es getrennte maxspeed:forward/maxspeed:backward gab noch zusätzlich ein "maxspeed" eingetragen. Wenn da die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung symmetrisch ist müs... commented 2026-06-24 08:48:01 UTC by flohoff ♦2,498 |
| 183685879 (Comments: 2) | danielbarton (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for picking that up, should be OK and not reporting now commented 2026-06-24 08:46:28 UTC by danielbarton ♦2 |
| 184239451 (Comments: 4) | Equipe 1 de cartographie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes sorry, I mean operator I'll check it today commented 2026-06-24 08:45:48 UTC by Equipe 1 de cartographie ♦1 |
| 184019023 (Comments: 5) | Marcel_Zuri_O (Discussed changesets: 3) | Doch: in diesem Changeset hat Marcel "traffic_signals:sound=yes" zugefügt, der du schon korrigiert hast. commented 2026-06-24 08:40:17 UTC by robryk ♦5 |
| 184492032 (Comments: 3) | IainTurpie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Typically you’d have a single area (or a multipolygon) tagged as landuse=quarry, which represents the whole workings of a particular quarry — rather than tagging individual parts of it with landuse=quarry separately. commented 2026-06-24 08:30:04 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,066 |
| 147272301 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 179) | For your interest, there is the possibility to split these Rome subway entrances in 2 relationships: so to better reflect that not all entrances communicate underground. So to better reflect that some entrances lead to a direction, and some others le... commented 2026-06-24 08:28:13 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦45 |
| 184507448 (Comments: 1) | idrox000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap! In Italia i civici vanno mappati come nodi in prossimità dell'ingresso a cui sono associati (di solito dove sta la mattonellina col numero). Per maggiori info consulta la wiki: https://wiki.ope... commented 2026-06-24 08:26:29 UTC by MarcoR ♦600 |
| 184454264 (Comments: 1) | Alcapone1212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184511989 commented 2026-06-24 08:24:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦534 |
| 184509201 (Comments: 1) | JoepK5 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Joep, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-24 08:06:22 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184511053 (Comments: 1) | Zero Latency VR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-24 08:05:01 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184510855 (Comments: 1) | Bestman 8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-24 08:02:24 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184472264 (Comments: 2) | Satchit P@ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for reviewing. This trail was surveyed on foot during a run on 21 Jun 2026. The trail exists on the ground and connects to a village road (Ways 860928709, v3). After which it joins new trail back to the top (Ways 1531849599, v1) commented 2026-06-24 07:52:40 UTC by Satchit P@ ♦2 |
| 184483051 (Comments: 1) | 橘ヒカリ (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert changeset 182604787 commented 2026-06-24 07:39:00 UTC by 橘ヒカリ ♦60 |
| 184273500 (Comments: 1) | lesp3527 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je crois que vous avez déplacé l'arrêt de bus "Église" sur la route/way. Les "platform" ne doivent pas appartenir à la route mais être sur le trottoir. Pouvez-vous cor... commented 2026-06-24 07:34:52 UTC by mga_geo ♦309 |
| 184417581 (Comments: 1) | Amelia Ind (Discussed changesets: 6) | You added the fiction. You should have removed it! commented 2026-06-24 07:34:51 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 184453330 (Comments: 2) | derbossmapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | servus, hast Recht, hab's geändert :) danke für den Hinweis! commented 2026-06-24 07:31:14 UTC by derbossmapper ♦2 |
 | 112649359 (Comments: 1) | Farshiid (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Our criteria for choosing a name tag is the municipal sign. If you are sure of the old name, you can put it in the old_name tag. If you are not sure or the locals call it differently, use the loc_name tag. For changes, use the documentation ... commented 2026-06-24 07:28:24 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦571 |
| 184510080 (Comments: 1) | ToniE (Discussed changesets: 234) | Oops! Bauarbeiten beendet: motor_vehicle:conditional kommt ans Ende. motor_vehicle=yes auf secondary unnötig commented 2026-06-24 07:24:46 UTC by ToniE ♦1,273 |
| 184486795 (Comments: 5) | Snowschumi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt voor deze aanpassingen. Ik heb het wandelnetwerk en het Waterliniepad nu op de juiste routes kunnen leggen Vriendelijke groeten, Dick van den Hoven commented 2026-06-24 07:20:26 UTC by dvdhoven ♦964 |
| 184483426 (Comments: 1) | Robert Skiba (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo Robert, Buslinien und Haltestellen richtig zu mappen ist nicht ganz einfach. Die Haltestelle Adenau Trierer Straße ist nach deinen Ändernungen fehlerhaft. Eine Stopposition kann für beide Richtungen gelten. Für Je... commented 2026-06-24 07:16:56 UTC by bernward1 ♦43 |
| 184472275 (Comments: 1) | Filohipo (Discussed changesets: 7) | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184466792 commented 2026-06-24 07:11:15 UTC by MappingMore ♦534 |
| 178581955 (Comments: 1) | amta68 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, you have changed the city marker to another location. The previous location selection has a historical reason and since ancient times, the zero point of Ardabil was Tazeh Meydan. If you have made this change to display region 5, the city will ... commented 2026-06-24 07:04:54 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦571 |
| 176341759 (Comments: 1) | Mapfixer12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Ha javítod a sávok számát, kérlek, figyelj a lanes:forward/:backward és a turn:lanes:* értékekre is! Köszönöm: Ákos commented 2026-06-24 07:04:24 UTC by itineris ♦423 |
| 184214041 (Comments: 2) | NytramZ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Heeft het fietspad asfalt tegels of straatstenen? commented 2026-06-24 07:00:08 UTC by Allroads ♦448 |
| 184214223 (Comments: 2) | NytramZ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Heeft het fietspad asfalt tegels of straatstenen? commented 2026-06-24 06:59:50 UTC by Allroads ♦448 |
| 183187871 (Comments: 1) | Nordpfeil (Discussed changesets: 75) | You made a syntax fix that removed the building from the map. This contradicts reality, because the building actually exists. I've therefore reverted to version 3. commented 2026-06-24 06:59:42 UTC by Mose53 ♦2 |
| 184485825 (Comments: 1) | androl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo androl, darf man die Website der Postleitzahlsuche der Deutschen Post für OpenStreetMap legal verwenden? Ich kann weder in den OSM Permissions noch in den Nutzungsbedingungen der Postleitzahlsuche eine Erlaubnis finden. osm.wiki/DE:P... commented 2026-06-24 06:53:03 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,086 |
| 184214360 (Comments: 1) | NytramZ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bedankt voor het toevoegen van oneway. Ik heb nog wel de uitzondering voor bicycle mofa en moped toegevoegd. Mocht je vragen hebben over Emmeloord, vraag het gerust. Groeten Allroads. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/153... commented 2026-06-24 06:51:49 UTC by Allroads ♦448 |
| 184480487 (Comments: 8) | Roel G (Discussed changesets: 4) | Roel, Je overleg heeft toch wat opgeleverd. 😀 Het oefengebied staat er nu in als disused. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-06-24 06:45:28 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184491068 (Comments: 2) | b-holdet (Discussed changesets: 75) | Tak og rettet 👍 commented 2026-06-24 06:35:31 UTC by b-holdet ♦372 |
| 184410086 (Comments: 4) | thirdoffive (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lovely; thank you for the help! commented 2026-06-24 06:26:50 UTC by thirdoffive ♦1 |
| 184507938 (Comments: 1) | sal256 (Discussed changesets: 8) | poprawka; Altana Wojtyniów commented 2026-06-24 06:20:37 UTC by sal256 ♦1 |
| 184497292 (Comments: 2) | Lauren_Ratini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed defibrillators commented 2026-06-24 05:51:43 UTC by nevw ♦2,245 |
| 184042445 (Comments: 2) | 000006 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, do you want me to revert the changeset to fix/reset the boundary and you can re-do your edit or would you prefer to fix it yourself when able. commented 2026-06-24 05:41:59 UTC by nevw ♦2,245 |
| 184456567 (Comments: 1) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 91) | Hi the multioligon is broken here. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.07605&lat=-37.68502&zoom=19 commented 2026-06-24 05:38:29 UTC by nevw ♦2,245 |
| 184275234 (Comments: 2) | Saint_Erk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for replying quickly and fixing this! I didn't notice this convention in the section of the map I had loaded, but as I visited more places in Spain I see it's consistently done this way. commented 2026-06-24 05:38:15 UTC by Saint_Erk ♦1 |
| 184493329 (Comments: 1) | Flornaud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi; Thank you for your edit, I've amended this slightly to 'access=private' which is a more appropriate tag then 'access=no' for this location to better reflect the 'No Public Access' signage, at the Wilmslow Road e... commented 2026-06-24 05:26:03 UTC by Wythenshawe_Mapper ♦11 |
| 184378873 (Comments: 2) | Amelia Ind (Discussed changesets: 6) | You are still change highway classification wrong, Which is disrupts routing. commented 2026-06-24 05:04:46 UTC by nileshbarawkar ♦15 |
| 184432805 (Comments: 2) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hi marcmarti , Hello, my name is Gaurav, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for taking the time to review my recent edit and revert my changes. I appreciate your clarification and the feedback regarding the restriction. I a... commented 2026-06-24 04:22:28 UTC by grawat_Lyft ♦20 |
| 181885503 (Comments: 2) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hi EveryStreetDuval, My name is Gaurav, and I am a mapper on Lyft's OSM team. Thank you for your comment. You are correct, and I appreciate you pointing this out. Rather than removing the access=no tag, it is generally better to replac... commented 2026-06-24 04:21:47 UTC by grawat_Lyft ♦20 |
| 182241432 (Comments: 1) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 37) | I think you might have separated columbus avenue between green and broadway into two oneway roads, but I don't think that was correct, columbus is not separated for those blocks commented 2026-06-24 03:53:51 UTC by benshapiro ♦4 |
| 184500142 (Comments: 1) | GGD56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello GGD56, If a trail is on private property, you can mark the legal access of the trail using a legal access tag like: access=private This allows users to see that the trail is private and avoid it, ensures that the trail isn&... commented 2026-06-24 03:52:18 UTC by eerib ♦311 |
| 184244856 (Comments: 2) | Adinurbekov (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for mentioning I'll know. commented 2026-06-24 03:39:42 UTC by Adinurbekov ♦1 |
| 184458258 (Comments: 1) | Beyond Zion Tours & Rentals (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184503760 https://osm.org/changeset/184503760 commented 2026-06-24 03:33:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 171885559 (Comments: 3) | palamito (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gracias por la aclaratoria. En ese caso podemos quitar la cerca? O es para el modelado 3D? Es que sin consenso para otros usos queda muy mal. commented 2026-06-24 03:09:36 UTC by pantufla ♦307 |
| 184408627 (Comments: 5) | OSMDMCA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello all, Thank you for handling this! Let me know if anything is needed on my end. I've retained copies of my GPX file and photo/video/audio notes and am happy to share with the DWG or OSMF if a dispute arises. Thank you a... commented 2026-06-24 02:59:15 UTC by eerib ♦311 |
| 184378392 (Comments: 2) | 紬ヴェンダース (Discussed changesets: 15) | 确实是忘掉了，已经加回来了~~ --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184378392 commented 2026-06-24 01:59:13 UTC by 紬ヴェンダース ♦13 |
| 184499669 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184501118 commented 2026-06-24 01:58:29 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184498484 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184500792 commented 2026-06-24 01:48:26 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184499947 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184500618 commented 2026-06-24 01:42:41 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184497605 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499828 commented 2026-06-24 01:19:14 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184498175 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499663 commented 2026-06-24 01:14:10 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184497846 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499663 commented 2026-06-24 01:14:10 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184496650 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499663 commented 2026-06-24 01:14:09 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184480728 (Comments: 2) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499663 commented 2026-06-24 01:14:09 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184368221 (Comments: 2) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 51) | Choć BDOT10k pokazuje już jakiś ciek wodny https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=5F4AC8A1-DE68-406F-817A-F0FD23021228 Dyskusyjny pozostaje przebieg tego cieku, przepustów przez trój... commented 2026-06-24 01:14:06 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦665 |
| 184498871 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Wrongly deleted data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499466 commented 2026-06-24 01:08:54 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184494521 (Comments: 1) | maripolu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Despegué el nodo del árbol del camino porque no puede ser ambas cosas a la vez. Pero desconozco de que lado está, si podés acomodarlo mejor. Gracias! https://wiki.openstreetm... commented 2026-06-24 01:04:24 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184497215 (Comments: 1) | RafaLopez (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por colaborar con el mapa! Edité el número de teléfono para adecuarlo a un formato que consideramos válido. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto commented 2026-06-24 00:55:24 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 183905438 (Comments: 1) | claudia10 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Alguma possibilidade de disponibilizar esse local no Instagram / Facebook ? commented 2026-06-24 00:54:34 UTC by V11 ARENA ♦1 |
| 184439178 (Comments: 3) | cielak42 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dzięki za odpowiedź i naniesienie poprawek! commented 2026-06-24 00:32:44 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184474457 (Comments: 1) | davegis (Discussed changesets: 22) | I removed invalid coastline. See duplicate islands, is it intended? 1531624363 1531630810 commented 2026-06-24 00:32:13 UTC by vng_me ♦144 |
| 184479272 (Comments: 1) | nickydonna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por colaborar con el mapa! Acomodé el comercio porque quedó unido a la línea de interpolación de enfrente. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto commented 2026-06-24 00:27:47 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184409534 (Comments: 1) | PabllooGG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, wykryłem nieprawidłowe tagowanie w tej zmianie m.in dot. to linii takiej jak ta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531290111 Jeśli jest to CPR (ciąg pieszo-rowerowy), to tagowanie powinno zostać poprawione zgodnie z wiki... commented 2026-06-24 00:20:43 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184479849 (Comments: 1) | grzegorzmilosz (Discussed changesets: 88) | Cześć, jeśli są tu CPRy tak jak np. tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531663502 to ich tagowanie powinno zostać poprawione zgodnie z wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w |
| 184494814 (Comments: 1) | Casteo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Please use proper changeset description and stop messing around with the boundaries. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184494814 commented 2026-06-23 23:54:27 UTC by aighes ♦46 |
| 181993300 (Comments: 2) | d_berger (Discussed changesets: 87) | Pardon, "Methusalem" stürzt nach 13+ Jahren Dauerbetrieb gelegentlich ab. Ich rekonstruiere jetzt nur die Kurzfassung: wir bilden in OSM keine nichtexistierenden Objekte ab, und auch keine nichtexistierenden Merkmale/Eigenschaften.[1]<... commented 2026-06-23 23:32:09 UTC by d_berger ♦213 |
| 184492428 (Comments: 1) | BrusselsTeslaFSD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, I wish there was a nicer way of welcoming you to OSM, but I am afraid that you have engaged in changing major roads on the map without fully understanding the dependencies between objects and how the data model works. This might be a nic... commented 2026-06-23 23:14:12 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 184492116 (Comments: 1) | BrusselsTeslaFSD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Vous avez sans doute de gentilles intentions… mais vos éditions ne sont pas correctes. SVP ne pas modifier les types de rues, et ne pas introduire des restrictions excessives et permanentes dans la database. Juste... commented 2026-06-23 23:03:06 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 184494129 (Comments: 1) | lirasevla (Discussed changesets: 1) | This court is not a tennis court but rather a futsal or multipurpose court; it doesn't have the characteristics of a tennis court. commented 2026-06-23 23:01:37 UTC by lirasevla ♦1 |
| 184491659 (Comments: 1) | BrusselsTeslaFSD (Discussed changesets: 3) | L'info est déjà sur OSM, avec les permissions d'accès. Ici, vous avez ajouté une restriction oneway, qui détruit les liaisons cyclistes et TC. Ceci n'est pas correct. Votre modification a &ea... commented 2026-06-23 22:58:50 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 184144710 (Comments: 2) | Peter_v_Aalst (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für den Hinweis. Habs entfernt. commented 2026-06-23 22:44:24 UTC by Peter_v_Aalst ♦4 |
| 184474684 (Comments: 3) | Jason Garnett Education UK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20859 commented 2026-06-23 22:15:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 179216343 (Comments: 8) | ZldYe (Discussed changesets: 56) | Mooi, bedankt! commented 2026-06-23 22:06:20 UTC by Roel G ♦2 |
| 184330506 (Comments: 1) | Victor Dps (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bonjour, Ce changement concerne la création d’un magasin. Vous devriez, par égard envers les autres contributeurs et pour mieux comprendre vos changements, adopter un commentaire... commented 2026-06-23 21:54:57 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦132 |
| 169976519 (Comments: 1) | ist410 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi, what does cuisine=community_centre mean on these cafes you add? That does not seem like a type of cusine (what food is served). commented 2026-06-23 21:48:29 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,941 |
| 127980913 (Comments: 1) | mottiger (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hallo, ich vermute, dass du dich hier verirrt habe: so weit ich mich erinnere, diese Ampel haben das Züri-standardmässiges vibrierendes Blindesignal und kein akustiches. Bist du anderer Meinung? Falls wir einig sind, dass das ... commented 2026-06-23 21:36:43 UTC by robryk ♦5 |
| 168324641 (Comments: 1) | N_de_ZH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich vermute, dass du dich hier verirrt habe: so weit ich mich erinnere, diese Ampel haben das Züri-standardmässiges vibrierendes Blindesignal und kein akustiches. Bist du anderer Meinung? Falls wir einig sind, dass das ... commented 2026-06-23 21:33:06 UTC by robryk ♦5 |
| 182584746 (Comments: 1) | KonturKreator (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it seems to me that this is in error. TTBOMK these traffic lights have the Zurich-standard vibrating signal for the blind and no acoustic signal. Assuming you agree with me: I've found many traffic lights in Zürich labelle... commented 2026-06-23 21:31:06 UTC by robryk ♦5 |
| 184318643 (Comments: 1) | Manuel Florian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Manuel Florian! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I see that you have made some highway classification edits here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184318643#map=11/47.5269/23.6805); changing highways to trunk, primary, and se... commented 2026-06-23 21:06:40 UTC by ColdWaterSeal ♦3 |
| 184450302 (Comments: 3) | mapmeld (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you! I live in the area an am looking forward to collecting some Mapillary imagery once it opens next week. commented 2026-06-23 21:04:16 UTC by ezekielf ♦92 |
| 184492965 (Comments: 1) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 7) | Por que ela seria classificada como auto pista se há várias travessias de pedestres em nível? commented 2026-06-23 20:53:41 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,225 |
| 184290580 (Comments: 2) | VLD299 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate your vigilance. I will ensure to monitor this more carefully moving forward. commented 2026-06-23 20:52:24 UTC by VLD299 ♦8 |
| 184476011 (Comments: 1) | mapmeld (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi mapmeld, thanks for keeping an eye on the Champlain Parkway opening, but you're early by a week. Quoting from the linked WCAX article: "the outbound side of the Champlain Parkway headed toward Interstate 189 will open mid-morning... commented 2026-06-23 20:42:48 UTC by ezekielf ♦92 |
| 184483105 (Comments: 1) | Adinurbekov (Discussed changesets: 3) | partly reverted - nope, no road there https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184492748 commented 2026-06-23 20:39:43 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| 184483527 (Comments: 1) | FFSchwarzenbek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, auch hier: keine Anmerkungen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-06-23 20:24:04 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184483552 (Comments: 1) | FFSchwarzenbek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe mir nur die letzte Fassung dieses Hydranten angesehen. Ich habe keine Anmerkungen, das sieht gut aus. Vielen Dank für d... commented 2026-06-23 20:22:21 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184491890 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 152) | Można pomyśleć, czy by nie ustawić starej nazwy jako old_name, a ten pochodzący z Wikimapii node ustawić jako label osiedla, dając aktualną nazwę. commented 2026-06-23 20:11:41 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦409 |
| 111743549 (Comments: 2) | MichaelKrieger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Per notes: “Closed to vehicle traffic. Pedestrian street. Barriers preventing vehicle access.” Also any navigation is going to go through one of the other streets where parking is available. commented 2026-06-23 20:05:58 UTC by MichaelKrieger ♦1 |
| 183406472 (Comments: 3) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 22) | Salut, oui je te confirme pour la véloroute. Il me semble que j’avais mis des photos sur Panoramax. Les points-nœuds y passent toujours. Le revêtement est plutôt mauvais en plus&nbs... commented 2026-06-23 20:00:19 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦132 |
| 184467899 (Comments: 1) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello. By changing oneway from -1 to yes, you totally reversed the street´s direction. Is that right? regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184467899 ... commented 2026-06-23 19:53:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 184465211 (Comments: 1) | Schärjer1904 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bitte erläutere diese Änderungen: Wieso building=yes ? Warum sollte hier ein so großes Gebäude stehen ? Wieso entfernst du amenity=plant_nursery ? Wird die Fläche nicht als Baumschule verwendet ? Wozu l... commented 2026-06-23 19:44:32 UTC by limes11 ♦1,049 |
| 184483937 (Comments: 1) | Waterbuffalo26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear Waterbuffalo26, the tagging "amenity=place_of_worship" and "building=yes" is correct, but "name=Hopi Kiva" is not correct. The name field is intended for situations in which a building actually has a name (typically... commented 2026-06-23 19:24:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,683 |
 | 71549911 (Comments: 1) | CharlesBronson (Discussed changesets: 1) | A couple roads here have been created with maxspeed=0 set, was that intentional? commented 2026-06-23 19:19:53 UTC by keithonearth ♦336 |
| 184488379 (Comments: 1) | mort85 (Discussed changesets: 2) | There is no radar, there are modules for simulated missions to Mars commented 2026-06-23 19:15:26 UTC by Dodko ♦1,352 |
| 184490098 (Comments: 1) | notj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Forgot to add that the source is me since I have firsthand knowledge of this area commented 2026-06-23 19:12:50 UTC by notj ♦1 |
| 184447865 (Comments: 3) | VLD317 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Yes, Links are there so they are adding routes for paths people would really take, especially when detours are available but non-attractive. commented 2026-06-23 18:59:36 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦498 |
| 184488315 (Comments: 2) | Tulpfreak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by changeset #184489356 probably vandalism or fantasymapping. commented 2026-06-23 18:51:01 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184389037 (Comments: 6) | mahoFR90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Spitze! commented 2026-06-23 18:44:29 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184461065 (Comments: 2) | Stuart_L (Discussed changesets: 5) | I take that back. Didn't notice those sites are in a PLRA, which the website does refer to. Apologies. commented 2026-06-23 18:35:41 UTC by Viajero Perdido ♦251 |
| 184488871 (Comments: 1) | 0578 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello there, please review this contribution. You apparently intended to map a Flock camera, but instead you mapped an unspecified thing with a name of "manufacturer=Flock Safety". commented 2026-06-23 18:35:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,683 |
| 184268720 (Comments: 3) | Joske1020 (Discussed changesets: 5) | thanks! commented 2026-06-23 18:35:10 UTC by Joske1020 ♦51 |
| 184448939 (Comments: 2) | VLD317 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thank you for the follow-up and for considering pedestrian routing. Since you've already made the adjustments, we will not edit it further. Happy mapping! commented 2026-06-23 18:31:26 UTC by VLD317 ♦17 |
| 184452491 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I hope this finds you well. I would like to know how you came into the conclusion of downgrading the classification of these segments of 5th of July Road between A and Annaba when they fit the criteria to be classified as motorways (as they were ... commented 2026-06-23 18:28:31 UTC by arafqus ♦15 |
| 184454186 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I hope this finds you well. I would like to know how you came into the conclusion of downgrading the classification of these segments of RN 1 between la Cote and Baba Ali junction when they fit the criteria to be classified as motorways (as they ... commented 2026-06-23 18:26:04 UTC by arafqus ♦15 |
| 184452732 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I hope this finds you well. I would like to know how you came into the conclusion of downgrading the classification of these segments of the highway between Cheraga and Tesala El Merdja junction when they fit the criteria to be classified as moto... commented 2026-06-23 18:23:20 UTC by arafqus ♦15 |
| 184455556 (Comments: 2) | Polissandro (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gracias por las correcciones y los consejos. Los voy a tener en cuenta para mis próximos aportes. ¡Muchas gracias! commented 2026-06-23 18:20:25 UTC by Polissandro ♦2 |
| 184287432 (Comments: 2) | VLD277 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, This modification was made in response to the pictogram on the side of the road showing a bicycle and a left turn arrow. Typically, this indicates that the intersection is designated for bicycles. After reviewing and factoring your conc... commented 2026-06-23 18:16:31 UTC by VLD277 ♦21 |
| 184372101 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I hope this finds you well. I would like to know how you came into the conclusion of downgrading the classification of these segments of RN 16 between the stream bridge right after the intersection with CW 56 and right up to the intersection wit... commented 2026-06-23 18:15:04 UTC by arafqus ♦15 |
| 184487855 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 152) | Czy zajmowany jest wyłącznie przez PSP - do sprawdzenia. commented 2026-06-23 18:13:52 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦409 |
| 184372226 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I hope this finds you well. I would like to know how you came into the conclusion of downgrading the classification of these segments of RN 16 between Annaba and El Hadjar when they fit the criteria to be classified as motorways (as they were pre... commented 2026-06-23 18:13:01 UTC by arafqus ♦15 |
| 184454973 (Comments: 2) | Polissandro (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por avisar y por las correcciones. Voy a estar mas atento la próxima vez. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184454973 commented 2026-06-23 18:12:07 UTC by Polissandro ♦2 |
| 184336511 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I hope this finds you well. I would like to know how you came into the conclusion of downgrading the classification of these segments of RN 44 between Berrahal and Annaba when they fit the criteria to be classified as motorways (as they were prev... commented 2026-06-23 18:10:01 UTC by arafqus ♦15 |
| 184455859 (Comments: 1) | guillaumebo (Discussed changesets: 1) | post your edits with large gaps seperately pls. commented 2026-06-23 18:08:34 UTC by yitimox ♦26 |
| 184098138 (Comments: 7) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 182) | Other `route=` has more roles `alternative` , `excursion` It's not the same as variants. Traffic diversions, or making stops are decided in-service. commented 2026-06-23 17:54:15 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,929 |
| 184486066 (Comments: 2) | 5m4u9 (Discussed changesets: 119) | Creo q esta es la 2da o 3ra vez que tenemos esta misma discusion commented 2026-06-23 17:41:59 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,278 |
| 183655640 (Comments: 4) | mikeho (Discussed changesets: 21) | Verkehr.NRW sagt immer noch Ende sei der 23.04.2031, wenngleich auch Ende 2028 genannt wurde. Ende 2028 erscheint mir sehr sportlich für 660 m Spannbetonbrücke. Für alle betroffenen Menschen hoffe ich, dass es so kommt! commented 2026-06-23 17:39:18 UTC by mikeho ♦23 |
| 178262670 (Comments: 1) | jan_k31 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Dag Jan. Heldt dat nog steeds en waarom ook foot=no? Mvg eggie commented 2026-06-23 17:37:53 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184479435 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 182) | 2. Is the roadway gone? Where would the EVA be? commented 2026-06-23 17:37:51 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,929 |
| 179465857 (Comments: 1) | Aldeyde (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ciao, come avevo specificato nel changeset precedente, le definizioni per la classificazione delle strade a scorrimento veloce sono cambiate. Il tag "primary" qui non è corretto. Per favore riporta indietro la modifica. Se ne d... commented 2026-06-23 17:36:16 UTC by Wilhem275 ♦7 |
| 184486091 (Comments: 1) | 5m4u9 (Discussed changesets: 119) | City segun lo acordado era por encima de 25000 habitantes no con 13000 commented 2026-06-23 17:32:38 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,278 |
| 184485946 (Comments: 1) | 5m4u9 (Discussed changesets: 119) | Lo dicho, los City son por encima de 25000 habitantes, No es ciudad con 10000 habitantes commented 2026-06-23 17:31:42 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,278 |
 | 184480088 (Comments: 1) | aesadf (Discussed changesets: 1) | ??? commented 2026-06-23 17:31:24 UTC by ilias_ ♦451 |
| 180217593 (Comments: 1) | Aldeyde (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ciao, come avevo specificato nel changeset precedente, le definizioni per la classificazione delle strade a scorrimento veloce sono cambiate. Il tag "primary" qui non è corretto. Per favore riporta indietro la modifica. Se ne d... commented 2026-06-23 17:30:59 UTC by Wilhem275 ♦7 |
| 184057666 (Comments: 7) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 182) | In general, it's more complicated to draw non-separated lines, because you have to ensure everything is connected correctly, and create all the turn `=restriction` It's still less work to split and add `change:lanes=` commented 2026-06-23 17:30:08 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,929 |
| 91532093 (Comments: 1) | ozmium (Discussed changesets: 5) | Teaffe Budapest commented 2026-06-23 17:29:54 UTC by Teaffe ♦1 |
| 183400094 (Comments: 2) | W3NET0wns (Discussed changesets: 31) | W związku z nieustosunkowaniem się do mojej prośby wycofuję twoją zmianę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184486771 Pojawienie się wniosku o ZRID nie jest źródłem informacji, że droga jest budowana. commented 2026-06-23 17:29:52 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦409 |
| 184366327 (Comments: 1) | Alex Khimich (Discussed changesets: 14) | Привіт! Будь ласка, не з'єднуй території (будь-якого типу) з дорогами, як-от, наприклад, way/1524919595. Хоч це й невеликі нюанси, але потім д... commented 2026-06-23 17:20:17 UTC by Nnifria ♦8 |
| 180536189 (Comments: 5) | NG_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | @vectorial8192 It's the application's problem. They shouldn't assume `informal=yes` is safe and reliable. commented 2026-06-23 17:19:14 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,929 |
| 176204397 (Comments: 1) | nnnn42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed name=* formatting in changeset 184486064 https://osm.org/changeset/184486064 commented 2026-06-23 17:11:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176049675 (Comments: 1) | SureStay Plus Hotel by Best Western (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed a number of errors/malformed tags: brand:wikidata=* not updated, brand=* doesn't match hotel name=*, name=* contains extraneous marketing, nonsensical tag value rooms=0, in changeset 184485959 https://osm.org/changeset/184485959 commented 2026-06-23 17:08:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184415065 (Comments: 2) | 芳文院 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 你好，感谢您的指正，有劳您退回了 commented 2026-06-23 17:04:48 UTC by 芳文院 ♦2 |
| 184400463 (Comments: 2) | Bloomenwease (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ich denke, das hängt vom Gebäudetyp ab. Bei großen Gebäuden wie Kirchen oder kleineren freistehenden Gebäuden sehe ich das oft so umgesetzt. Bei Läden im Ergeschoss von Wohnhäusern scheint es gängig zu sein, d... commented 2026-06-23 17:03:13 UTC by Bloomenwease ♦4 |
| 184475673 (Comments: 5) | Gavek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tę granicę Doliny Dolnej Tanwi jeszcze potem zobaczę. W OSM mamy historię, więc cofnięcie jej do poprzedniej wersji to nie będzie problem. Chociaż łatwiej to zrobić w bardziej zaawansowanym edytorze JOSM niż iD commented 2026-06-23 16:56:04 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 182279686 (Comments: 1) | Gmail12-01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | К сожалению Гугл.Карты для правок использовать нельзя commented 2026-06-23 16:47:27 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 184429696 (Comments: 2) | MountMapper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Den CS habe ich komplett zurückgesetzt. Nicht nur aufgrund des fehlerhaften Tagging für den Kreisverkehr, sondern auch weil einige Geometrien beschädigt wurden. Zudem fällt auf, dass Du (MountMapper) nicht nur in diesem CS,... commented 2026-06-23 16:42:58 UTC by hsc666 ♦484 |
| 184484463 (Comments: 1) | muurdraak99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback... Zo'n reddingspost zal niet op alle kaart layers renderen. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community ... commented 2026-06-23 16:41:10 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184479365 (Comments: 1) | Supreme Mobile Car Wash Detail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, I’ve reverted this in changeset 184484775. This needs to be mapped as a point since it’s in an apartment building with multiple existing tenants. Also please do not include promotional material in the description tag. commented 2026-06-23 16:40:17 UTC by schobbish ♦59 |
| 131954655 (Comments: 1) | Rajwali baig (Discussed changesets: 5) | Removed apparent SEO POI inexplicably added to Grand Trunk Road route relation, and also fixed/added missing tags (e.g. top-level tag), in changeset 184484805 https://osm.org/changeset/184484805 commented 2026-06-23 16:38:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 101239144 (Comments: 2) | Jinnah Technologies Private Limited (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Ignore the "Hi..."; accidentally copied the name of the wrong mapper) commented 2026-06-23 16:31:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183596375 (Comments: 2) | gosgtan (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bonjour, Je ne suis pas à l'origine des tracés, j'ai juste fait une découpe pour corriger un signalement osmose. Effectivement c'est une voie de service pour le chantier, donc modifications d'access à... commented 2026-06-23 16:30:59 UTC by gosgtan ♦12 |
| 182519400 (Comments: 1) | Erick tamba (Discussed changesets: 2368) | Hello Erick tamba, Thank you for mapping! I restored several deleted buildings and aligned them according to available imagery: Bing Aerial Imagery: 1180836465, 1199289046, 1187284690, 1186920524, 1182985881, 1172129250, 1186086824, 1176256907,... commented 2026-06-23 16:30:06 UTC by Palary ♦27 |
| 128112011 (Comments: 1) | miroslavuzice87 (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hi miroslavuzice87, I see you inexplicably added this POI to a major highway route relation, which is a common SEO spam tactic (several other SEO spammer POIs were added to the same route relation) and has no conceivable legitimate purpose on ... commented 2026-06-23 16:29:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 179931249 (Comments: 2) | pittrichimica (Discussed changesets: 75) | Inderdaad. Gecorrigeerd, bedankt! commented 2026-06-23 16:25:36 UTC by pittrichimica ♦54 |
| 160315431 (Comments: 1) | ThomasToSpace (Discussed changesets: 2) | This Wind Turbine was destroyed in 2017 in a wind storm. Can we remove this turbine? https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/grand-etang-wind-turbine-snaps-1.3923148 commented 2026-06-23 16:22:15 UTC by Funstahe ♦1 |
| 184480462 (Comments: 6) | FalaF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Frituur Martin was wel goed gegaan. commented 2026-06-23 16:21:40 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 140525030 (Comments: 1) | Victor Dps (Discussed changesets: 16) | Bonjour Victor, Vous avez créé le pont https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203034833 il y a 3 ans. Nous en parlons ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3657167 parce que rien n’est visible d... commented 2026-06-23 16:17:44 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦132 |
| 176468525 (Comments: 1) | SoftCrust Digital Marketig Agency (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert adding a SEO spam POI to a route relation, with malformed/nonsensical tags in changeset 184483979 https://osm.org/changeset/184483979 commented 2026-06-23 16:17:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 175883446 (Comments: 1) | Family Care Clinic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is prohibited by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184483796 https://osm.org/changeset/184483796 commented 2026-06-23 16:12:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 175675412 (Comments: 1) | Alex Bechiru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is prohibited by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184483756 https://osm.org/changeset/184483756 commented 2026-06-23 16:11:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182306122 (Comments: 1) | Kubula (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Kubula, Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed validation in couple of changesets implemented by you, ie. (buildings conflict: w/1175687094; w/1180881915; building and highway conflicts: w/1175703275; w/1175694162). Please inspect yo... commented 2026-06-23 16:06:24 UTC by Metauro ♦11 |
| 182398361 (Comments: 1) | Raaiba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Raaiba, Thank You for your contribution. There was validation errors in your changeset related to building and highway crossing (w/358005558, w/358005148, w/120232020), I have fixed that. Instepct your task carefully before closing, please. Ha... commented 2026-06-23 16:05:13 UTC by melody_Tej ♦28 |
| 182314986 (Comments: 1) | Joachim_0 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Joachim_0, I have fixed validation error between building and building (w/669017372 and w/666308593). Inspect your task carefully before closing, please. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-23 16:01:07 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦12 |
| 184264235 (Comments: 1) | sidatpio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, can you confirm that your office takes up the *entire* building or is just one of many tenants? If it’s the latter then it needs to be remapped as a point. Also please refrain from adding promotional content in your description. commented 2026-06-23 16:00:01 UTC by schobbish ♦59 |
| 182172104 (Comments: 1) | Iahaia Amisse (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Iahaia Amisse, Thank you for your contribution. You removed building (w/1180846057) incorrectly, so I restored it. Inspect your task carefully before closing, please. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-23 15:57:12 UTC by Nar_ach ♦17 |
| 184440828 (Comments: 2) | AkteZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das stimmt. Irgendwas muss mit der Ortung nicht geklappt haben. Habe es zum Entfernen markiert. Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2026-06-23 15:57:04 UTC by AkteZ ♦1 |
| 182604787 (Comments: 1) | meongseolin (Discussed changesets: 50) | Reverted in 184483051 commented 2026-06-23 15:56:58 UTC by 橘ヒカリ ♦60 |
| 184366867 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hello Pnorman, This was reverted because it appeared to be undiscussed automated edit that mass removed valid access tagging. You're welcome to contact the Data Working Group for a second opinion. https://wiki.openstreetmap... commented 2026-06-23 15:56:57 UTC by eerib ♦311 |
| 184342283 (Comments: 5) | pnorman (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello Pnorman, Just because there is a router assumption does not mean that you delete the data that further clarifies that assumption. For example, this would be similar to deleting oneway=no from all features because the default assumption i... commented 2026-06-23 15:50:28 UTC by eerib ♦311 |
 | 184448731 (Comments: 3) | Couldbethere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Yes, it looks fine now, thank you! commented 2026-06-23 15:46:10 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,088 |
| 184480017 (Comments: 1) | Fabian7777777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-23 15:43:53 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184469525 (Comments: 1) | Jochen121212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „... commented 2026-06-23 15:36:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 124578715 (Comments: 2) | LateNightTone (Discussed changesets: 56) | Ha - yes, I agonised a bit about how to map that; this seemed like the safest way! commented 2026-06-23 15:27:18 UTC by LateNightTone ♦85 |
| 180511140 (Comments: 2) | Nadjita (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hallo Marv, in Hannover haben wir uns auf den Stammtischen darauf geeinigt, dass wir bei Gebäuden mit nur einer Adresse diese auf das Gebäudepolygon setzen. Mehrfachadressen werden dagegen an die Eingänge oder als Node innerhalb... commented 2026-06-23 15:24:19 UTC by Nadjita ♦80 |
 | 184335099 (Comments: 2) | Jesus Argueta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buenos dias, muchas gracias por la observación, la tendré en cuenta. Saludos commented 2026-06-23 15:23:37 UTC by Jesus Argueta ♦1 |
| 184290077 (Comments: 8) | impact0r (Discussed changesets: 18) | Probably before I cut it into pieces. Fixing to driveway now. commented 2026-06-23 15:14:00 UTC by impact0r ♦10 |
| 184399403 (Comments: 3) | MathGon (Discussed changesets: 5) | J'ai lancé le débat ici: https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/pataugeoire-non-visible/43765 . Ca n'avance pas trop. Il y a un problème de rendu avec leisure=paddling_pool qui se confronte à de nombreux swimming_pool=... commented 2026-06-23 15:13:23 UTC by mute44 ♦2 |
| 184479156 (Comments: 1) | santioviedo08 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa. Al abrir el changeset en JOSM y validar devuelve 2 erores (graves) y 127 advertencias. Por favor coregirlos para evitar su reversión. En adelante, agregar árboles y editar calles en co... commented 2026-06-23 15:13:00 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 147313986 (Comments: 3) | MC436 (Discussed changesets: 10) | "drogi w śladzie toru" to za mało - samej kolei są jakieś ślady? commented 2026-06-23 15:09:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184433801 (Comments: 2) | Наташа_Гончарик (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, Tatfahren! Thank you for your question. The building:levels tag was removed along with the building tag because no confirmation was found regarding the configuration of the building under construction or the fact that construction wa... commented 2026-06-23 15:05:54 UTC by Наташа_Гончарик ♦3 |
| 16515593 (Comments: 1) | ClaudeMarani (Discussed changesets: 5) | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5358054 ? commented 2026-06-23 15:05:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184436796 (Comments: 1) | Зебра1932 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-06-23 14:55:47 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 184476050 (Comments: 1) | raraous (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pour ce type de modification récurrente, serait-ce possible d'ajouter au résumé le/les pays concernés (la France, j'imagine) ? Ou de limiter l'étendue géographique des changeset ? commented 2026-06-23 14:50:49 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
| 184432865 (Comments: 3) | Akashi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ein Name ist nur ein Indikator für eine öffentliche Straße. Track heisst ja da überwiegend oder ausschliesslich Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr stattfindet. In Anbetracht der Wohngebäude drumherum glaube ich da eher nich... commented 2026-06-23 14:44:27 UTC by flohoff ♦2,498 |
| 184477070 (Comments: 1) | Niels R (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Niels name \tVattenfall InCharge is de operator. Niet de naam van de paal. We zetten meestal geen name=.... en dan de operator naam. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-23 14:38:58 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184479412 (Comments: 3) | Roel G (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted by changeset #184479565 commented 2026-06-23 14:30:59 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184431077 (Comments: 1) | Jason Garnett Education UK (Discussed changesets: 8) | This user's changesets, including this one, have been reverted due to containing vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479600 commented 2026-06-23 14:29:43 UTC by Aethonatic ♦66 |
| 184431785 (Comments: 1) | Jason Garnett Education UK (Discussed changesets: 8) | This user's changesets, including this one, have been reverted due to containing vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479600 commented 2026-06-23 14:29:43 UTC by Aethonatic ♦66 |
| 184431332 (Comments: 5) | Jason Garnett Education UK (Discussed changesets: 8) | This user's changesets, including this one, have been reverted due to containing vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479600 commented 2026-06-23 14:29:43 UTC by Aethonatic ♦66 |
| 184431384 (Comments: 1) | Jason Garnett Education UK (Discussed changesets: 8) | This user's changesets, including this one, have been reverted due to containing vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479600 commented 2026-06-23 14:29:43 UTC by Aethonatic ♦66 |
| 184431537 (Comments: 1) | Jason Garnett Education UK (Discussed changesets: 8) | This user's changesets, including this one, have been reverted due to containing vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479600 commented 2026-06-23 14:29:43 UTC by Aethonatic ♦66 |
| 184179890 (Comments: 1) | Jason Garnett Education UK (Discussed changesets: 8) | This user's changesets, including this one, have been reverted due to containing vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479600 commented 2026-06-23 14:29:43 UTC by Aethonatic ♦66 |
| 184179565 (Comments: 1) | Jason Garnett Education UK (Discussed changesets: 8) | This user's changesets, including this one, have been reverted due to containing vandalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479600 commented 2026-06-23 14:29:42 UTC by Aethonatic ♦66 |
| 184400164 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 190) | Accidentally created node deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479371 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-06-23 14:26:17 UTC by MihaelIvanjek ♦29 |
| 184462053 (Comments: 1) | Djordy Schenkeveld (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-23 14:23:12 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184478173 (Comments: 4) | Roel G (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zie hier de changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1453716091/history/6 commented 2026-06-23 14:21:56 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 173800971 (Comments: 3) | Ich2PunktNull (Discussed changesets: 23) | offenbar werden sowohl bei bergfex als auch outdooractive sogar Flächen wie die folgende als Wasserfläche gerendert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348677076 https://www.bergfex.at/?mapstate=47.82366,16.633639,18,o,947,47.... commented 2026-06-23 14:21:32 UTC by Luzandro ♦1,005 |
| 184478274 (Comments: 1) | Roel G (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted by changeset #184479114 commented 2026-06-23 14:18:42 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184437584 (Comments: 4) | MoistTangerine2 (Discussed changesets: 18) | 谢谢，我稍后添加。 Thanks, I'll add it later. commented 2026-06-23 14:17:30 UTC by MoistTangerine2 ♦21 |
| 182760134 (Comments: 4) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 9) | > I doubt there is another feature that could have this old_name. That's not the issue here, in my opinion. > It's possible that other websites (like the ones you mention) handle this differently or have a historic focus... commented 2026-06-23 14:16:10 UTC by Mister Kanister ♦50 |
| 184472117 (Comments: 3) | kaartijn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hert 'gebouw' heb ik verwijderd commented 2026-06-23 14:10:12 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184463044 (Comments: 3) | tux67 (Discussed changesets: 131) | Danke dir commented 2026-06-23 14:09:51 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184172921 (Comments: 4) | amcclements (Discussed changesets: 13) | I’ve re-added the postcode to this building in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184478702 If you can give details of the problem you were seeing with Nominatim I can try and help find a long-term fix. commented 2026-06-23 14:04:54 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,066 |
| 180718475 (Comments: 1) | ceryslovell (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bore da Cerys Phil from the Data Working Group here. I am wondering what the source of your edits are? In the case of this one you quoted a pdf, but what licence was that released under and are we allowed to use it? I am also wondering w... commented 2026-06-23 14:04:12 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,673 |
 | 184472752 (Comments: 1) | Stoner01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228970085/history/5 commented 2026-06-23 14:04:05 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 153647768 (Comments: 4) | CaptainCarte (Discussed changesets: 43) | Ok thanks. I've removed the bridge tag from the crossing because with it, it would seem like you have to cross a bridge to cross the road and that is not the case. The road you cross is the bridge over the railway tracks. Pedestrians don't ... commented 2026-06-23 13:54:11 UTC by evo_evz ♦23 |
| 184432883 (Comments: 1) | Xinfe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, in this changeset you created a railway=proposed way about 35 times. Please be more careful when using strange editing applications and check your edits with a professional editor like JOSM and its integrated validator afterwards. P... commented 2026-06-23 13:46:43 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,229 |
| 184353499 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 182) | At least, it's what Kovoschiz told me: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180237869 commented 2026-06-23 13:39:19 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 179153749 (Comments: 2) | pootriarch (Discussed changesets: 36) | Remerged commented 2026-06-23 13:26:31 UTC by TheNightRider ♦62 |
 | 184470764 (Comments: 4) | Prasanna Msamy (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thank you for the clarification and for performing the edits. We appreciate your local knowledge and your efforts in helping keep the map accurate. Best regards, Prasanna Devi M commented 2026-06-23 13:14:30 UTC by Prasanna Msamy ♦21 |
| 178904444 (Comments: 4) | Patr1k_P (Discussed changesets: 47) | No ja som to robil čo najjednoduchšie, takže som to len prepísal pomocou zbgis vrstvy, občas to tak spravím keď si niekde všimnem že je zmena.. Väčšinou to však ťahám z dodkovej strá... commented 2026-06-23 13:00:53 UTC by Patr1k_P ♦479 |
| 61032049 (Comments: 4) | berjk (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hallo berjk, ich habe mir die Quellen des Wikipedia-Artikels sowie weitere verfügbare Informationen angeschaut und den Ersteller kontaktiert. Er hat selbst erneut recherchiert und kam zum Schluss, dass es für "Altes Schloss" genau... commented 2026-06-23 12:54:15 UTC by urk ♦41 |
| 134628578 (Comments: 1) | Himké (Discussed changesets: 81) | Is it really appropriate to use `landuse=cemetery` for columbaria? commented 2026-06-23 12:53:44 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 184438114 (Comments: 1) | Corsa5 (Discussed changesets: 157) | Здравствуйте. Подскажите, почему у улицы статус изменился с highway=residential на highway=unclassified? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120801451 commented 2026-06-23 12:42:36 UTC by mavl ♦76,985 |
| 184431101 (Comments: 1) | raraous (Discussed changesets: 2) | Et pourquoi faire un changeset aussi vaste ? commented 2026-06-23 12:38:47 UTC by Sharko_MV3 ♦5 |
| 184427700 (Comments: 1) | Strony internetowe Kacper Głodowski (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cześć, OSM ma określone zasady co do nazw POI. Nie jest to miejsce na SEO. Poprawiłem Twoją edycję i zaktualizowałem dane na poprawne w OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13957585781 commented 2026-06-23 12:27:44 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,070 |
| 184056483 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 182) | Well first grass has nothing to do with this. And then, pictures of heaths on the wiki look nothing like any typical Hong Kong roadside plantations. commented 2026-06-23 12:26:12 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 184402553 (Comments: 2) | Mizuna (Discussed changesets: 31) | Ja, een tweede ingang. Kortste of simpelste weg vanaf hoofdingang ziekenhuis, metro etc. commented 2026-06-23 12:25:40 UTC by Mizuna ♦16 |
| 184429430 (Comments: 6) | Robert Skiba (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dann ist es ein motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry ohne weitere foot/horse/bicycle/access-tags Bei einem VZ 250 wäre es vehicle=agricultural;forestry, was Fahrräder ausschließt. Oft wissen Gemeinden dies nicht und selten wird ... commented 2026-06-23 12:22:01 UTC by limes11 ♦1,049 |
| 184470697 (Comments: 1) | AstroVulpes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Any import into OpenStreetMap from third-party data sources needs to go through a community vetting process and requires documentation on the wiki. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for details. It appears that this import is ... commented 2026-06-23 12:21:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,683 |
| 184448953 (Comments: 1) | giochitr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184474326 commented 2026-06-23 12:17:14 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
 | 184312850 (Comments: 1) | Mark Kits (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You did not adjust the offset which was required. Please square also your rectangular buildings. Best regards commented 2026-06-23 12:16:47 UTC by Frans S ♦10,686 |
| 176048524 (Comments: 5) | scott_mobile16 (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK thanks mate. commented 2026-06-23 12:05:32 UTC by scott_mobile16 ♦3 |
| 184471579 (Comments: 3) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 22) | "drinking_water=* indicates whether a feature provides drinking water, specifically whether water is drinkable for humans." A feature itt a patika. commented 2026-06-23 12:00:54 UTC by qstep ♦123 |
| 184450240 (Comments: 2) | Altts (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! fixed it. commented 2026-06-23 11:53:07 UTC by Altts ♦6 |
| 184094086 (Comments: 3) | RaphaelTraini (Discussed changesets: 1) | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184094086 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184473273 commented 2026-06-23 11:51:24 UTC by Mister Kanister ♦50 |
| 184447024 (Comments: 1) | hhxupix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184472981 commented 2026-06-23 11:46:35 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 184286616 (Comments: 1) | armaanazeem (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping here. A question Why did you add a layer -1 to a building. It means that it is underground what it isn't . Often this construction is done to hide an issue. Just solve the issue. Best regards commented 2026-06-23 11:45:59 UTC by Frans S ♦10,686 |
| 184386338 (Comments: 2) | chenil (Discussed changesets: 1) | baik commented 2026-06-23 11:44:10 UTC by chenil ♦1 |
| 184458338 (Comments: 1) | wasiri (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. It seems you have sent the changeset on accident before finishing the buildings. They appear unsquared and their geometries sometimes mismatch the actual building footprint. Their location seems needing to be adjusted as well to the most accur... commented 2026-06-23 11:26:53 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦24 |
| 184408047 (Comments: 1) | gnlpfth (Discussed changesets: 55) | Ich habs gerade bemerkt. Danke fürs ausbessern! Schade eigentlich, dass da keine Züge halten ;) commented 2026-06-23 11:26:50 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦65 |
| 176212735 (Comments: 4) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 47) | В такъв случай оставям на друг да отбележи актуалното състояние, изобщо за зоната, тъй като явно по-скорошни данни няма, а на живо лично а... commented 2026-06-23 11:21:51 UTC by Fraxi ♦367 |
| 175244885 (Comments: 1) | Hovastro (Discussed changesets: 2) | @Hovastro The outline of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631282485/ looks... strange. What did you base that on? commented 2026-06-23 11:17:35 UTC by able-macaroni-pacemaker ♦2 |
| 184469977 (Comments: 1) | Shortcake-Magnolia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. You can just add drinking_water=yes to the pharmacy. I've fixed it, no need for a separate node. commented 2026-06-23 11:08:18 UTC by qstep ♦123 |
| 180360129 (Comments: 2) | Negjana (Discussed changesets: 75) | Ich frage nun im Forum nach, da hier keine Antwort kam: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-und-lizenz-daten-von-den-obb/144815 commented 2026-06-23 10:57:10 UTC by Rainero ♦812 |
| 171337861 (Comments: 3) | Mohamat Safri Marada (Discussed changesets: 3) | They are from surveyed PoI, but they have no correct tags to render. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173302164 commented 2026-06-23 10:35:36 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 173302164 (Comments: 1) | Mohamat Safri Marada (Discussed changesets: 3) | semua PoI ini tidak akan di-render karena belum ada tag yang sesuai. Mohon konsultasikan dengan komunitas commented 2026-06-23 10:33:32 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184352074 (Comments: 1) | Adam Haba (Discussed changesets: 134) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531010888 highway=steps + steps=0? commented 2026-06-23 10:28:42 UTC by YomanNH ♦501 |
| 184444699 (Comments: 1) | matpie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Moin, also wenn der weg nicht mehr da ist dann wäre doch sowas wie "visbility" oder "surface" und "Smoothness" richtig. "access=no" Impliziert das da ein Schild steht - sowas wie "Betre... commented 2026-06-23 10:19:12 UTC by flohoff ♦2,498 |
 | 184368607 (Comments: 1) | Nick Xia (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks for all your edits! appreciate you going back and fixing those earlier ones :) perfect use of bridge:name=* here commented 2026-06-23 10:16:41 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦492 |
| 184467555 (Comments: 1) | CPTS-Boostup-secretariat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Lors de votre fusion, les champs ref:FR:RPPS ont été perdu. Est-il possible de les réajouter pour ne pas perdre de données ? Par ailleurs, vous pouvez utiliser le champ operator pour indiquer le nom des prat... commented 2026-06-23 10:16:26 UTC by K12230LF ♦64 |
| 184467092 (Comments: 2) | freethemes4all (Discussed changesets: 2) | La société n'existe pas https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/zoekadresform.html?postcod1=4000&postgemeente1=&straatgemeente1=All%C3%A9e+des+Ramons&huisnummer=22&filterEnkelActieve=true&_filterEnkelActieve=on&a... commented 2026-06-23 10:11:49 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦141 |
| 184465927 (Comments: 2) | freethemes4all (Discussed changesets: 2) | There is no registred company here, https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/zoekadresform.html?postcod1=6044&postgemeente1=&straatgemeente1=IMPASSE+DES+HAYETTES&huisnummer=12&filterEnkelActieve=true&_filterEnkelActieve=on&ac... commented 2026-06-23 10:06:21 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦141 |
| 182060948 (Comments: 7) | عمر ا (Discussed changesets: 1) | I agree with @KhalidKashmiri commented 2026-06-23 10:05:36 UTC by zstadler ♦1,136 |
| 184454292 (Comments: 1) | SpeedMcCool (Discussed changesets: 12) | reverted for those streets that are already present in relations (e. g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20702822 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18365886 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15056525 etc.) https://www.opens... commented 2026-06-23 09:59:50 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| 11710255 (Comments: 2) | mike67 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Der Name "Zillertal" für die kleine Siedlung am Finkenberg in Bonn-Limperich geht auf die Nachkriegszeit zurück. Nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg zogen ausgebombte Bürger aus Beuel in das ehemalige Basaltsteinbruchgeländ... commented 2026-06-23 09:50:15 UTC by mike67 ♦1 |
| 182807703 (Comments: 2) | natejw (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is a reference officially used by the Railway and society in documentation and "safeworking" training, that is the reason for it being tagged as a ref and not a local ref. officially it is said as "Platform 1" & "Pla... commented 2026-06-23 09:49:58 UTC by natejw ♦1 |
| 184454197 (Comments: 2) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 36) | I realized earlier that the PMI humanitarian POIs came from an import, but I hadn't double-checked them yet. I just took a look, and indeed, the .0 shouldn't be used. Thanks for the heads-up! This looks like a small data issue that requires... commented 2026-06-23 09:39:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184467423 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 225) | dzięki za poprawe, byłem przekonany że tego typu nielegalnych przejść sie nie mapuje commented 2026-06-23 09:37:21 UTC by Gavek ♦3 |
| 184445779 (Comments: 2) | Gavek (Discussed changesets: 2) | najmocniej przepraszam, jestem tu nowy, myślałem że jak oznaczę to miejsce jako Porytowe Wzgórze to obejmie cały ten obszar. Czy myślisz, że mimo zbocza zaznaczonego jako Porytowe Wzgórze warto zostawić ten tag tylko w bliżej p... commented 2026-06-23 09:35:27 UTC by Gavek ♦3 |
| 145990771 (Comments: 1) | fs25 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ciao fs25, è stata aperta una nota riguardo a un toponimo che hai aggiunto, riesci a rispondergli? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5357650 (un altro dei toponimi aggiunti in questo changeset è stato già c... commented 2026-06-23 09:32:16 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,906 |
| 184409468 (Comments: 2) | 67 tuffboi73 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20858 commented 2026-06-23 09:26:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184409405 (Comments: 1) | 67 tuffboi73 (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184467242 commented 2026-06-23 09:23:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184423684 (Comments: 7) | Максим Баранаускас (Discussed changesets: 7) | Понял, значит ничего дополнительно указывать не буду. commented 2026-06-23 09:20:47 UTC by Максим Баранаускас ♦6 |
| 184166870 (Comments: 2) | marialoyko (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello. Thanks for the information, I'll take it into account in my work. Best regards commented 2026-06-23 09:14:48 UTC by marialoyko ♦13 |
| 184385708 (Comments: 6) | alexey_zakharenkov (Discussed changesets: 37) | и вот еще прямо указано, что так делать не стоит: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:boundary%3Dplace#Несовместимость commented 2026-06-23 09:11:51 UTC by literan ♦7,145 |
| 184373978 (Comments: 2) | maniackb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184458237 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184373978 commented 2026-06-23 09:10:03 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
| 184386044 (Comments: 2) | Skoda84 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184457879 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184386044 commented 2026-06-23 09:09:04 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
| 184413706 (Comments: 1) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 134) | Hello, thank you for map improvements. Next time please make sure you dont break bus relations that runs through the area. I am fixing it for now. commented 2026-06-23 09:05:26 UTC by adamos ♦67 |
| 184198939 (Comments: 1) | purplefoxcosmo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184254899 commented 2026-06-23 09:05:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
 | 184165836 (Comments: 1) | SadRobot11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184224879 commented 2026-06-23 09:04:28 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
 | 184196330 (Comments: 1) | Rabar Hussein (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184218861 commented 2026-06-23 09:03:36 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
 | 184427914 (Comments: 1) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 37) | I am fixing it for now. Next time please make sure you dont break bus line relations that runs through the edited intersections, thank you commented 2026-06-23 09:02:55 UTC by adamos ♦67 |
| 184347836 (Comments: 1) | Michele144 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salve, perché hai cancellato quest'elemento? Lì c'è una rampetta che permette di scendere in strada commented 2026-06-23 09:02:22 UTC by George Sears ♦89 |
| 184200154 (Comments: 1) | Francisco Aragon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184211819 commented 2026-06-23 09:02:19 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
| 184161167 (Comments: 1) | GregHikeBike (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184209804 commented 2026-06-23 09:00:41 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
 | 184163097 (Comments: 1) | ashanti2005 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184209718 commented 2026-06-23 08:59:29 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
| 184218636 (Comments: 1) | ngpeds (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184260543 commented 2026-06-23 08:58:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
| 184262151 (Comments: 1) | Vishaal Arasu TRS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184415926 commented 2026-06-23 08:56:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦570 |
| 184433473 (Comments: 1) | Casteo (Discussed changesets: 9) | If you change the name of something from "Florian Street" to "Florian Avenue", you can delete the "name_1=Florian Avenue", we don't need to duplicate that. Also in cases like this, consider doing some "TIGER cl... commented 2026-06-23 08:52:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,683 |
| 184439674 (Comments: 1) | Casteo (Discussed changesets: 9) | In his changeset you have added quite a few "bumps" to West Chicago Road (or Street?) - look here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184439674#map=19/42.364064/-83.266640 Please fix them. Also, please use proper changeset comments ... commented 2026-06-23 08:50:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,683 |
| 184309757 (Comments: 7) | SimonPoole (Discussed changesets: 67) | thank you for the pointer, I have added a summary of my current understanding to the thread. commented 2026-06-23 08:41:38 UTC by dieterdreist ♦908 |
| 182585170 (Comments: 2) | 10-NHN-DKraijer (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hallo Tjuro, we zijn bekend met de Wiki. Ervaring leert ook dat het anders niet goed (genoeg) werkt dus als je tips hebt hoe we dit beter kunnen verwerken dan hoor ik het graag. Deze situatie komt vaker voor dus als we het beter kunnen doen dan graa... commented 2026-06-23 08:41:16 UTC by 10-NHN-DKraijer ♦5 |
| 184305937 (Comments: 1) | Quiterie CPTS-Boost'up (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Merci pour vos ajustements. Cependant, attention, la liste des noms est perdu. Vous pouvez utiliser le champ Operator pour les renseigner. Autrement, les utilisateurs ne pourront pas les retrouver par leur nom. commented 2026-06-23 08:38:39 UTC by K12230LF ♦64 |
| 184428639 (Comments: 3) | faraz_munj (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK, thanks for removing it. Regards Bernard commented 2026-06-23 08:37:40 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 171765405 (Comments: 2) | catcus (Discussed changesets: 1) | ... ich nehme den Defi nun heraus. commented 2026-06-23 08:37:22 UTC by bigbug21 ♦160 |
| 150628067 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 182) | I said "provisional". That's indeed how we work irl (no voice -> implicit agree) but again, "provisional". commented 2026-06-23 08:36:11 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦175 |
| 184436129 (Comments: 3) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 172) | Oh, very good. I did not notice the node was duplicated when I moved it. A more descriptive commit message would have been nice. commented 2026-06-23 08:30:12 UTC by Tuplanolla ♦8 |
| 184464646 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 175049746, 175050275, 175051849, 175060395, 175389990, 175390020, 175390044, 175390138, 175390222, 175400885, 175400971, 175400995, 175432833, 175432844, 175542453, 175709385, 175709407, 175... commented 2026-06-23 08:21:47 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175542453 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:47 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175400885 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:47 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749524 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:46 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182972788 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:46 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175400995 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:46 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183479243 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:46 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175750077 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:46 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175050275 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:46 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175432833 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:45 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175717191 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:45 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478127 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:45 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183019644 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:45 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182967259 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:45 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182972883 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:44 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182972979 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:44 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478789 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:44 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182969688 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:44 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478153 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:44 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182972868 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:43 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175049746 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:43 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175754706 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:43 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182969022 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:43 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478249 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:43 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183479018 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:43 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175743914 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:42 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749636 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:42 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182969103 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:42 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183479091 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:42 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182968852 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:42 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182971347 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:41 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182968323 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:41 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966341 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:41 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175717230 (Comments: 2) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:41 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183479130 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:40 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477609 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:40 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182967130 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:40 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182972767 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:40 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175750126 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:40 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182971387 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:39 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183135671 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:39 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182968884 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:39 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175754688 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:39 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175717295 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:39 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175754722 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:39 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182967160 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:38 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966103 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:38 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966250 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:38 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182968221 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:38 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477902 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:38 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478777 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:38 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966491 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:37 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749573 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:37 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182968700 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:37 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966975 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:37 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478897 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:37 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478217 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:37 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749625 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:36 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478189 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:36 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966739 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:36 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175389990 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:36 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477750 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:36 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749385 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:36 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966416 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:35 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749797 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:35 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749457 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:35 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478972 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:35 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175754668 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:35 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175943036 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:34 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183479224 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:34 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175390044 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:34 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182967011 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:34 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175060395 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:34 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182969061 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:34 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182967064 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:33 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966177 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:33 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183019699 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:33 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183135686 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:33 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175400971 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:33 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175750158 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:32 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183479061 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:32 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175750196 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:32 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478825 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:32 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966946 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:32 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477991 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:32 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478104 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:31 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478848 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:31 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477939 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:31 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749274 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:31 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182971499 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:31 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182972823 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:31 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175750185 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:30 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182972925 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:30 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175750096 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:30 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175390020 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:30 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749713 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:29 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749610 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:29 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175709407 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:29 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183479300 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:29 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749376 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:29 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175390222 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:29 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182969334 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:28 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183479176 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:28 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175717324 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:28 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175709385 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:28 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182968785 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:28 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182968914 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:28 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175750241 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:27 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182967089 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:27 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477860 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:27 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477962 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:27 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182966910 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:26 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478948 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:26 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175432844 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:26 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478068 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:26 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477765 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:26 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749402 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:25 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175051849 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:25 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175390138 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:25 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 175749349 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:25 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183477839 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:24 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 183478866 (Comments: 1) | Gaurab5034 (Discussed changesets: 34) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856 commented 2026-06-23 08:21:24 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 184452810 (Comments: 1) | BPilot253 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Принципно такъв завой е забранен, когато има стрелки за ляв завой или когато на светофара има лява стрелка. По-скоро може да се добави except... commented 2026-06-23 08:11:02 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦931 |
| 175274022 (Comments: 1) | ThexAlind (Discussed changesets: 5) | Cleaned up tags for POI in changeset 184463792 https://osm.org/changeset/184463792 commented 2026-06-23 08:00:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 128565701 (Comments: 1) | ThexAlind (Discussed changesets: 5) | Cleaned up tags for Shah Mobile POI in changeset 184463516 https://osm.org/changeset/184463516 commented 2026-06-23 07:55:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184463516 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Revert (Discussed changesets: 13) | (Accidentally submitted with wrong comment) commented 2026-06-23 07:55:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 173627047 (Comments: 1) | Johannes-DH6TQ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo @Johannes-DH6TQ, für den name=* tag gibt es einige Regeln. Im wiki wird das gut erklärt. Eine Wildtierkamera hat imo keinen Eigennamen und "Luchsbeobachtung" ist eher der erhoffte Zweck commented 2026-06-23 07:41:21 UTC by HAmap ♦79 |
| 128554471 (Comments: 1) | ThexAlind (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fixed/formatted a number of tags on this POI, and also removed another duplicate with no details added long ago, in changeset 184463089 https://osm.org/changeset/184463089 commented 2026-06-23 07:41:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184398599 (Comments: 1) | bedrstefan (Discussed changesets: 2) | zou het kunnen dat je een foutje hebt gemaakt? het bos is nu wit op de kaart. commented 2026-06-23 07:40:19 UTC by Joske1020 ♦51 |
| X | 184453444 (Comments: 1) | SpeedMcCool (Discussed changesets: 12) | reverted for Giorgi Atoneli Street: already present at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18995349 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184462925 commented 2026-06-23 07:35:21 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| 147822360 (Comments: 3) | سامر سمير (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Samer Samir, At least in some cases, e.g. node 11657135710 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11657135710 (Dia Mart), the POI already existed as node 10124871387 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10124871387 and a duplicate was created h... commented 2026-06-23 07:34:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 127972229 (Comments: 1) | ThexAlind (Discussed changesets: 5) | Cleaned up and consolidated with a later duplicate node in changeset 184462836 https://osm.org/changeset/184462836 commented 2026-06-23 07:32:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 127972482 (Comments: 1) | ThexAlind (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fixed/refined geometry and tagging for adjacent American Hospital and Adar Care Center POIs in changeset 184462836 https://osm.org/changeset/184462836 commented 2026-06-23 07:32:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184425862 (Comments: 1) | androl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo androl, darf man die Website der Postleitzahlsuche der Deutschen Post für OpenStreetMap legal verwenden? Ich kann weder in den OSM Permissions noch in den Nutzungsbedingungen der Postleitzahlsuche eine Erlaubnis finden. https://wiki.... commented 2026-06-23 07:31:34 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,086 |
| 172280867 (Comments: 1) | Johannes-DH6TQ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo @Johannes-DH6TQ , ist die als Fläche eingezeichnete FGV-Hütte gleichzeitig der als Punkt eingetragene Unterstand? Falls ja, sollte das vereinigt werden commented 2026-06-23 07:31:00 UTC by HAmap ♦79 |
| 184447014 (Comments: 1) | Scourge1976 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, cool das du bei OpenStreetmap mit machst. Du könntest dir bei den Changeset kommentaren ein bisschen ausführlicher werden. "Diverses" ist schwierig und führt dazu das man sich alles einzeln ansehen muss. Hier ha... commented 2026-06-23 07:15:33 UTC by flohoff ♦2,498 |
| 184315297 (Comments: 2) | viktoryia fedarava (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, dknelson9876! Thanks for your comment and the feedback. I will take this into account when working on similar cases in the future. Best regards, viktoryia fedarava. commented 2026-06-23 07:13:21 UTC by viktoryia fedarava ♦3 |
| 183882277 (Comments: 2) | viktoryia fedarava (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, dknelson9876! Thanks for your comment and the feedback. I will take this into account when working on similar cases in the future. Best regards, viktoryia fedarava. commented 2026-06-23 07:13:05 UTC by viktoryia fedarava ♦3 |
| 183906613 (Comments: 2) | viktoryia fedarava (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, dknelson9876! Thanks for your comment and the feedback. I will take this into account when working on similar cases in the future. Best regards, viktoryia fedarava. commented 2026-06-23 07:12:33 UTC by viktoryia fedarava ♦3 |
| 175364443 (Comments: 1) | NAPYPOZYCJA (Discussed changesets: 4) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184461762 https://osm.org/changeset/184461762 commented 2026-06-23 07:00:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 175364265 (Comments: 1) | NAPYPOZYCJA (Discussed changesets: 4) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184461727 https://osm.org/changeset/184461727 commented 2026-06-23 06:59:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 164324387 (Comments: 1) | NAPYPOZYCJA (Discussed changesets: 4) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184461670 https://osm.org/changeset/184461670 commented 2026-06-23 06:57:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 184381306 (Comments: 2) | Growebis (Discussed changesets: 10) | my bad commented 2026-06-23 06:50:44 UTC by Growebis ♦19 |
 | 175451470 (Comments: 1) | BachaHabibAllah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up incorrect SEO and other tagging for POI in changeset 184461152 https://osm.org/changeset/184461152 commented 2026-06-23 06:43:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184430300 (Comments: 1) | Stranger_I (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 commented 2026-06-23 06:43:39 UTC by Uralla ♦62 |
| 175458758 (Comments: 1) | Columbia Auto Collision Center (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding a building inside a building with SEO POI tags in changeset 184460987 https://osm.org/changeset/184460987 commented 2026-06-23 06:39:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 175788372 (Comments: 1) | Dev-PK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted replacing a railway station with malformed SEO spam POI tags (and no top-level tags) sourced from Google Maps, which is prohibited by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184460843 https://osm.org/... commented 2026-06-23 06:36:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184416286 (Comments: 2) | nikolaymapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks yelisey90! Fixed. I removed the fuel tags from the buildings and added a node for the station near the fueling stands. commented 2026-06-23 06:36:33 UTC by nikolaymapper ♦4 |
| 175417614 (Comments: 1) | Nozimjon777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding POI tags with a source=* of Google Maps, which is prohibited by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184460725 https://osm.org/changeset/184460725 commented 2026-06-23 06:33:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184453982 (Comments: 2) | Sandstone Farm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please stop making these modifications buddy. They have been marked as "private" indicating they are not for public use nor access. You do not need to add a name to them. We get it you don't want people on your land but this isn't... commented 2026-06-23 06:32:21 UTC by KevinOs ♦28 |
| 184459127 (Comments: 1) | Florin Ciotoroschi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-23 06:21:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184454042 (Comments: 1) | Sandstone Farm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-23 06:21:22 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184453967 (Comments: 1) | Sandstone Farm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the added names real? commented 2026-06-23 06:21:11 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184427201 (Comments: 1) | Anurag1061 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-23 06:20:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184369284 (Comments: 1) | Kiskrof (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-23 06:20:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184216903 (Comments: 3) | Kolas Cannabis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi @AriAlvarez, Thanks for asking. My previous comment was very short because I was on the road and mainly wanted to mark this changeset for later review. By “Spam” I did not mean that a business is never allowed to add or i... commented 2026-06-23 06:06:17 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184454774 (Comments: 1) | shibin lv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why remove highway=stop? I dont think any routers use traffic_sign=stop nodes commented 2026-06-23 05:53:18 UTC by Colbertson ♦160 |
| 184411009 (Comments: 2) | shibin lv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Its been a day without any reply, ive reverted this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184459744 commented 2026-06-23 05:51:04 UTC by Colbertson ♦160 |
| 184418681 (Comments: 2) | disc24 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, im Prinzip hast Du Recht. Das Verkehrszeichen Tool sagt das so in diesem Fall. Da habe ich nicht genau hingeschaut. Allerdings will man generell die access Tags ja eher weg haben. Bei 250 Schildern mit land-/forstwirtschaftlicher Freigabe... commented 2026-06-23 05:50:15 UTC by disc24 ♦36 |
| 152450811 (Comments: 1) | OpenPepe (Discussed changesets: 4) | In dem Abschnitt sind Busspur und Radfahrstreifen mit einer durchgezogenen Linie getrennt. War in dem Fall nicht cycleway:right=lane richtig? commented 2026-06-23 05:42:47 UTC by HaraldBk ♦3 |
| 184447979 (Comments: 1) | RosannevK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dag Rosanna, Wanneer wandelen is toegestaan op een pad met access=private kun je het beste foot=permissive taggen ipv yes. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-23 05:26:22 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184415239 (Comments: 1) | Ab Bais (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your new road Way: 1186092966 duplicates an existing highway; this duplication could cause disruption to routing. Thus I've remomed it. Any corrections should be made to existing features where possible. <... commented 2026-06-23 05:25:47 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 184456784 (Comments: 1) | Jan Willem 78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd. In OSM Nederland zijn al adresnodes. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community... commented 2026-06-23 05:22:49 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184449868 (Comments: 1) | ME1966 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd. Er zijn hier adresnodes. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-23 05:20:24 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184458708 (Comments: 1) | kmpoppe_repair (Discussed changesets: 25) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 180333368. commented 2026-06-23 05:16:39 UTC by kmpoppe_repair ♦473 |
| 180333368 (Comments: 2) | Tom of Essex (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184458708 where the changeset comment is: DWG Ticket#2026061610000401, disputed information commented 2026-06-23 05:16:38 UTC by kmpoppe_repair ♦473 |
| 184379115 (Comments: 1) | szulcu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-06-23 05:13:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184378747 (Comments: 1) | MrBartek (Discussed changesets: 23) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-06-23 05:13:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184388925 (Comments: 1) | sulka79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-06-23 05:13:48 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184383311 (Comments: 1) | Szymon Blachura (Discussed changesets: 18) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13955421042 Pozdrawia... commented 2026-06-23 05:13:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184400900 (Comments: 1) | DwiAprianS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184458447 commented 2026-06-23 05:09:56 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 184336141 (Comments: 3) | mclarkdev (Discussed changesets: 1) | I did not intend to include the SC point, I will be more aware of boundary sizes with future changesets. commented 2026-06-23 05:06:36 UTC by mclarkdev ♦1 |
| 184048848 (Comments: 5) | Scottie0001 (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks Scottie, I will mention related changesets here :) commented 2026-06-23 04:55:01 UTC by stragu ♦33 |
| 184311657 (Comments: 2) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello kre777, thank you for your detailed feedback and inquiry. The intention behind this change was to follow the OSM guideline of mapping roads as separate carriageways when a physical median is present. However, I see your point about ... commented 2026-06-23 04:53:36 UTC by World_Winner ♦83 |
| 184302771 (Comments: 2) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello rskedgell, thank you for taking a closer look and your kind remarks. The bus lane is visible on Bing Streetside imagery from 2019. But unfortunately I don’t have any more recent resources available to me at the location other ... commented 2026-06-23 04:48:55 UTC by World_Winner ♦83 |
| 184253016 (Comments: 6) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello felipeeugenio, Thank you for your understanding and for taking the time to discuss this further. I understand your point on the turn lane topic and understood your concern on over-segmentation. Also thank you for consulti... commented 2026-06-23 04:44:00 UTC by World_Winner ♦83 |
| 184424444 (Comments: 4) | icedteafanatic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Great, thanks for checking. commented 2026-06-23 04:20:55 UTC by nevw ♦2,245 |
| 184372781 (Comments: 1) | Baso Khaerullah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184457448 commented 2026-06-23 04:15:12 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 184427846 (Comments: 4) | MKnight (Discussed changesets: 67) | Im Prinzip lasse ich die Quelle bei solchen Änderungen weg wenn es keine Quelle gibt, stattdessen kannst du genau das im changeset angeben das du nur die syntax korrigiert hast, dann erwartet niemand das du dazu eine mögliche unerlaubte Que... commented 2026-06-23 04:02:58 UTC by Tatfahren ♦357 |
| 184426050 (Comments: 2) | nikolaymapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, yelisey90. You're absolutely right, thanks for catching that! Fixed now. Thanks. commented 2026-06-23 03:08:41 UTC by nikolaymapper ♦4 |
| 184287759 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 220) | I guess I would disagree, having been through there a bunch (have family in the area). Plus, from an aesthetic standpoint it makes more sense to me to have the exit all one type of highway or another, but that's just my personal preference. <... commented 2026-06-23 02:57:56 UTC by SD Mapman ♦80 |
| 176266292 (Comments: 1) | JewelryRasooli (Discussed changesets: 3) | De-duplicated with POI node with nonsensical overlapping building way, and merged/cleaned up malformed and misleading tags, in changeset/184455886 https://osm.org/changeset/184455886 commented 2026-06-23 02:57:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176185396 (Comments: 1) | JewelryRasooli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Removed nonsensical building on top of building for SEO spam POI, de-duplicated with POI node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13395286970 and merged/cleaned up malformed and misleading tags, in changeset 184455886 https://osm.org/changeset/... commented 2026-06-23 02:57:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176455130 (Comments: 1) | JewelryRasooli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for removing the duplicate. However, the duplicate way was a nonsensical building (that didn't exist independently) on top of an actual building. Therefore, I removed it, restored you POI node here and merged/cleaned up its tags in change... commented 2026-06-23 02:51:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184391274 (Comments: 6) | alstond981 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Great, thanks commented 2026-06-23 02:44:04 UTC by alstond981 ♦4 |
| 175956958 (Comments: 1) | PramonoUtomo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The you added was missing any top-level tag https://osm.wiki/Top-level_tag to describe what it actually is. I'm guessing it's maybe a restaurant, based on the name? Therefore, I added the appropriate tag on that case to the POI i... commented 2026-06-23 02:41:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176646631 (Comments: 1) | Luse91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Luse91, welcome to OpenStreetMap! First off, note that using Google Maps as a source for your changes is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ). As it seems you have firsthand knowledge of this developmen... commented 2026-06-23 02:37:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184448965 (Comments: 1) | Black Sky Coffee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reversed node drag and inexplicable removal of building=* tag and fixed misformatted phone=* for SEO POI in changeset 184455331 https://osm.org/changeset/184455331 commented 2026-06-23 02:16:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184409311 (Comments: 1) | FindableDesign (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184409311 commented 2026-06-23 02:10:58 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 181486401 (Comments: 3) | katpatuka (Discussed changesets: 128) | Thank you for your reply. However, I think it's easy to underestimate Tibetan rivers when looking at the imagery. I know many of these rivers are 5-10 meters wide and are impossible to walk through without risking one's life. ... commented 2026-06-23 02:09:07 UTC by superstition railway ♦4 |
| 184428234 (Comments: 1) | DBCA (Discussed changesets: 19) | This appears to deliberately revert a correct edit. Do you have any valid reason for the revert? Instead of messing up the map history with an edit war, leave a comment on the change that you have an issue with and explain why. This applies to ... commented 2026-06-23 01:54:34 UTC by sweaty_techie ♦2 |
| 184434879 (Comments: 1) | Roof Geeks Auburn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising, malformed tags and a prohibited source of Google Maps https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184454866 commented 2026-06-23 01:43:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184396407 (Comments: 1) | Edward Abhishek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Your changeset is reverted as Motorway tag has special meaning as access controlled expres... commented 2026-06-23 01:40:59 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦773 |
| 184436495 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 220) | No problem. Thankfully, it was easier than I thought it'd be since the road is fairly straight and there weren't too many ways connected to the road, and there were only two relations to worry about. commented 2026-06-23 01:27:09 UTC by Joseph R P ♦446 |
| 184451614 (Comments: 1) | serock (Discussed changesets: 77) | Hola, gracias por contribuir! Revisé en iD y me parece que tiene sección Issues. Saludos! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... commented 2026-06-23 01:08:40 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184124588 (Comments: 2) | poddavan (Discussed changesets: 1) | На отроге хребта стоит металлический контейнер, раньше там было оборудование для радиосвязи. Удобный ориентир при переходе. commented 2026-06-23 01:04:29 UTC by poddavan ♦1 |
| 184438062 (Comments: 1) | Stevanin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Be careful with natural=coastline tags. Use coastlines validator in JOSM. commented 2026-06-23 01:01:17 UTC by vng_me ♦144 |
| 184227159 (Comments: 6) | Geocrest (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello. I thought it was you the mapper who did that, It is totally OK. regards commented 2026-06-23 00:49:12 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 184364039 (Comments: 1) | skdzpl (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2026-06-23 00:43:42 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 101406086 (Comments: 3) | ElliottPlack (Discussed changesets: 98) | I appreciate it. I know the nearby section of "Something's gotta give" that crosses into an adjacent plat needs assessment as to whether it can be tagged access=permissive or should remain private. the lingering bike=yes there is confu... commented 2026-06-23 00:40:19 UTC by Nater Kane ♦11 |
| 184265365 (Comments: 3) | HurdenShipCanal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ok, thanks for your response. It is very strange. regards commented 2026-06-23 00:36:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 184450833 (Comments: 4) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Consultado o registo cadastral sou levado a concluir que o meu caro PL 2188677 tem toda a razão. Os edificios à direita (mais afastados dos painéis solares) não pertencem à herdade da Matinha (antiga Quinta da Mat... commented 2026-06-23 00:30:53 UTC by Filohipo ♦34 |
| 184440594 (Comments: 2) | ppalma (Discussed changesets: 7) | En el IGM aparece Los Ranchillos también. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184440594 commented 2026-06-22 23:39:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 184444692 (Comments: 1) | Angelica GM Propiedades (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Una cosa es la calle, y otra es el número, pero aca parece que agregó la dirección como nombre. Voy a corregirlo. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2026-06-22 23:38:05 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 184435007 (Comments: 1) | Charles Foulon (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, j'ai remarqué que vous aviez remplacé la piste que j'avais tracé par une piste de vélo sportif, j'avais pourtant tagué la piste conformément au plan de la ville, qui indique que &ccedi... commented 2026-06-22 23:13:25 UTC by Tosenbo ♦13 |
| 184035604 (Comments: 1) | Stonpic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aquest camí encara existeix encara que està poc mantingut. No es pot borrar. commented 2026-06-22 22:35:40 UTC by KaiserDr ♦2 |
| 184035644 (Comments: 1) | Stonpic (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aquests camins son de domini public i estan catalogats als ajuntaments de Fornells i Girona, no s’hak de borrar commented 2026-06-22 22:32:28 UTC by KaiserDr ♦2 |
| 184399341 (Comments: 2) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Nee hoor het is zover ik weet geen default. Het is het verschil dat er specefiek staat dat er geen fietstrook is en dat het onbekend is of er een fietsstrook is (: commented 2026-06-22 22:23:17 UTC by Tomas09 ♦108 |
| 182243818 (Comments: 1) | SKIKI67 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184451237 commented 2026-06-22 22:07:12 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 182243642 (Comments: 1) | SKIKI67 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184451225 commented 2026-06-22 22:06:51 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 184300411 (Comments: 1) | NightTsarina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830858226/ Is addr:housenumber=S7 correct? commented 2026-06-22 21:27:42 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,168 |
| 184051193 (Comments: 1) | jonathanhoogstra2006 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, it's very unusual that you tagged Little Bear Creek as an aqueduct with a ford at the highway. It was previously tagged as an intermittent stream, and looks likely to have a culvert tunnel under the road. Can you either cite your source or c... commented 2026-06-22 20:56:52 UTC by neuhausr ♦356 |
| 184448751 (Comments: 1) | Vinzenz Mai (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hallo Vinzenz Mai, noch mal die Frage: Haben wir die Erlaubnis der Stadt Hürth die Daten in OSM zu verwenden ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-06-22 20:49:52 UTC by Zrop ♦140 |
| 178093208 (Comments: 1) | LinoBorchers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Siberberweg kann nicht richtig sein. Mindestens fehlt das L. Ist Manshardtstraße wirklich nicht mehr aktuell? commented 2026-06-22 20:48:53 UTC by hannum! ♦1 |
| 85844898 (Comments: 1) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 212) | Szia! Arra, hogy Németh András tervezte a József Attila utcai árkádot mi a forrásod? Internetes kereséssel nem találok erről semmit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808866563 |
| 184448807 (Comments: 1) | crossingover_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Проспект 600 річчя - 2 полоси (але широкі), Василенка - 2 полоси. Також дороги проходять через спальні квартали. commented 2026-06-22 20:34:53 UTC by crossingover_ ♦1 |
| 184161188 (Comments: 1) | kyleekailihiwa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Awesome, this will help with navigation apps. Thanks! commented 2026-06-22 20:29:00 UTC by AriAlvarez ♦6 |
| 183825824 (Comments: 1) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 79) | Was ist die echte, reale Grundlage? Bitte echte Quellen! Dann: bei solchen Dingen zwingend, nie und nimmermals Relationen schrotten! Die Nacharbeiten dann sind erheblich aufwändiger! Ich hab das zurückgebaut... verärgerte Gr... commented 2026-06-22 20:28:23 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,178 |
| 184440997 (Comments: 1) | LockeC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for updating the walkways in Lincoln! commented 2026-06-22 20:28:06 UTC by AriAlvarez ♦6 |
| 184230539 (Comments: 4) | BakoyeRiver (Discussed changesets: 8) | Asa completion- the bridge is straight - both lanes, the road whichconnect to the bridge heads are curved. commented 2026-06-22 19:58:56 UTC by rarad74 ♦523 |
| 158877176 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 212) | Hey, the path you deleted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473466771) exists. I don't understand why you did this, but I'm going to restore it. commented 2026-06-22 19:40:58 UTC by Sieva ♦10 |
| 184272357 (Comments: 3) | BakoyeRiver (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi rarad74, thank you for informing me of the roundabout speed in Romania. The road was remodeled from [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417589451] and [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476590512] up to [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15303745... commented 2026-06-22 19:29:18 UTC by BakoyeRiver ♦7 |
| 171575504 (Comments: 2) | Jean-Pierre Rondeau (Discussed changesets: 42) | Bonsoir YBau, Il s'agit manifestement d'une erreur de ma part. Je vous laisse le soin de rectifier. Cordialement. commented 2026-06-22 19:29:05 UTC by Jean-Pierre Rondeau ♦12 |
| 181812938 (Comments: 3) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 94) | A path does not need to look or be or official to be mapped. I understand not wanting to map something part of someone's back yard, but don't worry it is not. This can be verified using the MassGIS L3 Parcels overlay which can be turned on ... commented 2026-06-22 19:25:20 UTC by jm428 ♦51 |
| 184378029 (Comments: 3) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 2) | Формално погледнато самия бизнес се намира на ниво -2. На -1 няма какво да прави човек. Това което мен ме притеснява е че ако бъде само с level=-... commented 2026-06-22 19:15:29 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦931 |
 | 150465045 (Comments: 2) | P-E_LRX (Discussed changesets: 11) | Corrected! commented 2026-06-22 19:11:47 UTC by P-E_LRX ♦9 |
| 184441801 (Comments: 1) | Vinzenz Mai (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hallo Vinzenz Mai, haben wir die Erlaubnis der Stadt Hürth die Daten von huerth.de in OSM zu verwenden ? Ich konnte nichts finden. Gruß Zrop commented 2026-06-22 19:11:02 UTC by Zrop ♦140 |
| 184380231 (Comments: 1) | he who knows (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2026-06-22 18:57:43 UTC by Comino ♦357 |
| 184378148 (Comments: 1) | Ozon OSM4 (Discussed changesets: 10) | здесь же стоит на здании тег was:building=retail, зачем вы вновь отрисовываете его куски? commented 2026-06-22 18:51:37 UTC by literan ♦7,145 |
| 184407866 (Comments: 1) | randomaper (Discussed changesets: 7) | в чем причина удаления тега здания? commented 2026-06-22 18:48:54 UTC by literan ♦7,145 |
| 170697163 (Comments: 3) | saraswathi89 (Discussed changesets: 1113) | Thank you for your work. Happy mapping! commented 2026-06-22 18:47:18 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦14 |
| 178155884 (Comments: 5) | vlakos555 (Discussed changesets: 90) | Vďaka commented 2026-06-22 18:43:29 UTC by vlakos555 ♦59 |
| 147868512 (Comments: 5) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 133) | Ich glaube das es wie es jetzt ist tatsächlich besser ist. Wir haben keine spitzen Winkel für linksabbieger und auch das die linksabbieger von Westen nicht die strassenbahngleise kreuzen müssen ist korrekt abgebildet. commented 2026-06-22 18:40:13 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,564 |
| 184297831 (Comments: 3) | Grass-snake (Discussed changesets: 66) | вы на будущее так не делайте, без "все равно", хорошо? commented 2026-06-22 18:35:30 UTC by literan ♦7,145 |
| 184443885 (Comments: 2) | Cv33333 (Discussed changesets: 2) | De boom heb ik teruggeplaatst. commented 2026-06-22 18:25:44 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 181964216 (Comments: 2) | tyfi (Discussed changesets: 432) | New imagery, aligned building commented 2026-06-22 18:20:13 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦28 |
| 184380194 (Comments: 2) | Altts (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Thanks for the corrections. I digitized based on open data and wasnt entirely sure about the connecting buildings. I have just updated the mapping accordingly (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184443859), created multipolygon with build... commented 2026-06-22 18:19:59 UTC by Altts ♦6 |
| 184443240 (Comments: 1) | Cv33333 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast of toegevoegd. Doe ook niet te veel in één changeset. |
| 184438013 (Comments: 1) | VeronicaDonis2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Revisados los conjuntos de cambios. Gracias por la contribución. Excepto las observaciones en el primero, los cambios se ven bien para mí. Los canales de contacto de la comunidad OSM AR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argenti... commented 2026-06-22 18:19:34 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
 | 166238968 (Comments: 3) | kwiecpav (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Pavel, that buildings are part of a campsite which offers motorhome pitches and camping meadow for tents as well. While a hotel building contains multiple separate rooms/apartments with more or less additional service, the almost two dozen cab... commented 2026-06-22 18:17:36 UTC by urk ♦41 |
| 180470573 (Comments: 4) | rempshaener (Discussed changesets: 48) | Danke dir commented 2026-06-22 18:09:21 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184150684 (Comments: 5) | ParkCountyMT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ope, here's the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184443337#map=9/45.266/-110.579 commented 2026-06-22 18:00:44 UTC by watmildon ♦310 |
| 184067582 (Comments: 2) | rempshaener (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hallo. Jein. Beim letzten Besuch waren die Aufgänge gesperrt, von unten sah es nach Gastro aus...? Viele Grüße commented 2026-06-22 17:59:59 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 132543461 (Comments: 2) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 74) | Bonjour, Il n'y a aucune réglementation française qui définit ce qu'est une voie express, et encore moins de règle unique sur OSM. Si les panneaux auxquels tu fais référence sont les p... commented 2026-06-22 17:46:46 UTC by AurélienQ ♦170 |
 | 183157832 (Comments: 3) | Geocrest (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi Gazer75, thank you for making the corrections. I misinterpreted the available sources, both internal and public, and changed the highway classification incorrectly. You remark on imagery sources for Norway is also duly noted. I’ll take extra... commented 2026-06-22 17:37:50 UTC by Geocrest ♦5 |
| 183916992 (Comments: 5) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi user1572739, Thank you for the additional information and sharing your local knowledge. I will keep this in mind and monitor future developments and available sources before making any further edits. commented 2026-06-22 17:34:07 UTC by Gorger ♦51 |
| 184425945 (Comments: 3) | SzymonH (Discussed changesets: 67) | a to w takim razie ma to sens commented 2026-06-22 17:22:07 UTC by lukabułka ♦38 |
| 184432051 (Comments: 1) | sal256 (Discussed changesets: 8) | to nie Skarżysko tylko Zagórze commented 2026-06-22 17:20:48 UTC by lukabułka ♦38 |
| 180947619 (Comments: 1) | redweizn (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3688183599 The shop states it is closed since Jan 23 2026. So how could the opening hours be valid at 2026-04-06 when you surveyed it? commented 2026-06-22 17:05:18 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,941 |
| 180745975 (Comments: 1) | Warrior302 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Warrior302, Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed the validation error related to buildings intersection. Make sure to fix all validation errors before uploading a changeset. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-22 16:52:05 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦39 |
| 180428606 (Comments: 1) | asabea (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi asabea, Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed validation error for intersecting buildings (1492914974, 1492914976, 1488939850, 1488939849) ) within your 2 fixed tasks. Take a closer look while data upload. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-22 16:50:41 UTC by Ra_colate ♦23 |
| 184440015 (Comments: 1) | ToddRWalker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Trail name is from the posted Grand River Conservation Authority posted trailhead maps. commented 2026-06-22 16:43:13 UTC by ToddRWalker ♦1 |
| 182523835 (Comments: 1) | asabea (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi asabea, Thank You for your contribution. There were several errors introduced within tasks fixed by you (examples: ways 1186203950, 378910100, 1186204542; ways 1174117427, 1174116734; ways 1204989057, 1204989603; ways 1186201838, 142704062; ways 1... commented 2026-06-22 16:26:33 UTC by Nar_ach ♦17 |
 | 182294545 (Comments: 1) | Surveyor Lewinsky (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Surveyor Lewinsky I have fixed validation error related to amenity objects in your changeset. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-22 16:25:51 UTC by Nar_ach ♦17 |
| 184297533 (Comments: 8) | Norbert Wołowiec (Discussed changesets: 15) | możesz się na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 zapytać albo szerzej na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/tagging/71 ale z tego co widzę to Yog Sotowi nie podoba się aktualnie używana met... commented 2026-06-22 16:24:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 177241341 (Comments: 3) | Yog Sot (Discussed changesets: 83) | tak, ale 1) powinno to być przydatne innym 2) nawet gdyby było to zrozumiałe to nic to nie wnosi, jak było zmapowane w OSM to oczywiste jest że według informacji mapującego to istniało commented 2026-06-22 16:22:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184310656 (Comments: 2) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi d_berger, Thank you for reverting the changeset. The roundabout tag was already existing before my edit. The GPS traces were also suggesting a circular fashion of movement, so I went on to modify the geometry to a circular shape. Thank you... commented 2026-06-22 16:11:32 UTC by Kaduna ♦34 |
| 184079365 (Comments: 2) | by H (Discussed changesets: 1) | 已知晓，感谢阁下辅助。 commented 2026-06-22 16:11:17 UTC by by H ♦2 |
| 184438630 (Comments: 1) | Jezus Heer van de Sabbat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-22 16:10:37 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184314894 (Comments: 4) | SimonPoole (Discussed changesets: 67) | thank you for being diligent. :) commented 2026-06-22 16:09:24 UTC by dieterdreist ♦908 |
| 184438538 (Comments: 1) | Jezus Heer van de Sabbat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-22 16:08:12 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184438883 (Comments: 1) | HarryGwinnell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oops, wrong link in the source. The actual notice is https://publicnoticeportal.uk/notice/traffic-and-roads/69b44a206e48b6c1cd52f75f commented 2026-06-22 16:06:42 UTC by HarryGwinnell ♦1 |
| 184339973 (Comments: 1) | FreeEverything (Discussed changesets: 1) | 校区名要用英文括号标注。参加中国标注指南https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97#%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8#%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E4%B8%8E%E7%A7%91%E7%A0%94 commented 2026-06-22 16:00:43 UTC by baotao ♦4 |
| 181039279 (Comments: 1) | Kubula (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Kubula, Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed validation errors between building and highway crossing within couple of your tasks. Make sure to clear out validation errors before uploading a changeset. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-22 15:58:23 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦12 |
| 181250886 (Comments: 1) | JaneAmerica12 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello JaneAmerica12, Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed validation error for highway intersections. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-22 15:58:00 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦12 |
 | 180983670 (Comments: 1) | beyond_myworld (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello beyond_myworld, Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed couple of validation errors related to intersecting building within your fixed tasks. Be aware of validation errors while future editing. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-22 15:55:45 UTC by Metauro ♦11 |
| 184436956 (Comments: 2) | Rockedf (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thank you for noticing and fixing the error. Happy mapping to you too! commented 2026-06-22 15:46:53 UTC by Rockedf ♦24 |
| 184419384 (Comments: 1) | Jvitegem (Discussed changesets: 35) | Mijn punt is dat er aan een paar wegen gewerkt maar jij hebt ze allemaal op "construction" gezet. Die wegen waar echt aan gewerkt wordt heb ik op "Construction" laten staan. commented 2026-06-22 15:40:05 UTC by Jvitegem ♦22 |
| 183965870 (Comments: 2) | taxi301 (Discussed changesets: 127) | Dla porządku piszę tutaj, że po osobistym obejrzeniu postawiłem na foot=permissive bicycle=permissive, zresztą w większości miejsc dałem highway=pedestrian (jeszcze jeżdżą ciężarówki, wygląda, jakby chodniki służyły też za dr... commented 2026-06-22 15:40:02 UTC by BartekChom ♦37 |
| 176578239 (Comments: 4) | Mathnasium at Houston (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding Mathnasium SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184437512 https://osm.org/changeset/18443751... commented 2026-06-22 15:28:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176610676 (Comments: 3) | Mathnasium at Closter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up incorrectly abbreviated street name in changeset 184437439 https://osm.org/changeset/184437439 commented 2026-06-22 15:27:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184137195 (Comments: 4) | bknavyyard (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please see the visitor's map found here: https://www.brooklynnavyyard.org/directions-map/ commented 2026-06-22 15:25:58 UTC by bknavyyard ♦5 |
| 177020188 (Comments: 3) | Mathnasium at Irving (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding Mathnasium SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184437073 https://osm.org/changeset/18443707... commented 2026-06-22 15:18:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176895515 (Comments: 3) | Mathnasium at Hollywood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding Mathnasium SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184437050 https://osm.org/changeset/18443705... commented 2026-06-22 15:18:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176950991 (Comments: 3) | Mathnasium at Johns Creek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding Mathnasium SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184437017 https://osm.org/changeset/18443701... commented 2026-06-22 15:17:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183265862 (Comments: 8) | Константин Гам (Discussed changesets: 307) | и собственно те следы отчётливо видны на esri... я застал именно этот момент. Может изыскатели, но визуально было похоже на вполне конкрет... commented 2026-06-22 15:14:14 UTC by Константин Гам ♦773 |
| 184181803 (Comments: 12) | Multidragon (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ok zuicz to usuwam. Jakieś rady na przyszłość? commented 2026-06-22 15:12:59 UTC by Multidragon ♦6 |
| 183242595 (Comments: 1) | MOTYANCHIK (Discussed changesets: 2) | Добрый день. Перенос информации с Яндекс карт запрещен! commented 2026-06-22 15:11:42 UTC by ednzxt ♦17 |
| 177519481 (Comments: 3) | Mathnasium at Mohegan Lake (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding Mathnasium SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184436706 https://osm.org/changeset/18443670... commented 2026-06-22 15:10:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177558799 (Comments: 3) | Mathnasium at Plano (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding Mathnasium SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184436658 https://osm.org/changeset/18443665... commented 2026-06-22 15:09:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184434672 (Comments: 1) | oyrowe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-22 15:09:49 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184431266 (Comments: 1) | Sikko Klein (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback noexit=yes kan beter weg. Dat klopt niet. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-22 15:09:25 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184433728 (Comments: 1) | Manu1400 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Bonjour le nom Tokyo est-il un nom visible sur place ? Ou plutôt une référence ? commented 2026-06-22 15:06:56 UTC by K12230LF ♦64 |
| 184431666 (Comments: 4) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 36) | Ah baik. Saya akan coba pulihkan commented 2026-06-22 15:01:51 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184434724 (Comments: 2) | commune de Morlon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh, I've just seen that `mv=no` was added to the bridge 8 years (!) ago. Details on the changes on the bridge are visualized here: https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/31753191 commented 2026-06-22 15:00:04 UTC by habi ♦2,154 |
| 184429031 (Comments: 2) | addedentry (Discussed changesets: 8) | Actually, probably on the path on the inner side of the pond. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356162891 Is the current tagging correct? Sending bikes on the outer ring on what looks more like an informal grassy path seems strange. commented 2026-06-22 14:59:33 UTC by gmar5 ♦96 |
| 183778751 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 384) | Voorlopig weet ik alleen zeker dat lijn 210 er stopt (in beide richtingen). commented 2026-06-22 14:57:18 UTC by goedegazelle ♦254 |
| 179060792 (Comments: 4) | UDK Azur (Discussed changesets: 2) | Split SEO POI from highway node and cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for POI in changeset 184435883 https://osm.org/changeset/184435883 commented 2026-06-22 14:50:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 179124607 (Comments: 1) | UDK Azur (Discussed changesets: 2) | Split SEO POI from highway node and cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for POI in changeset 184435883 https://osm.org/changeset/184435883 commented 2026-06-22 14:50:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 179192190 (Comments: 3) | eneskaplanavtr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed remaining invalid and highly ambiguous check_date=* and start_date=* format in changeset 184435671 https://osm.org/changeset/184435671 commented 2026-06-22 14:45:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184428701 (Comments: 1) | asaga s (Discussed changesets: 3) | 間違えたので、リバートお願いします commented 2026-06-22 14:45:05 UTC by asaga s ♦3 |
| 184428716 (Comments: 1) | asaga s (Discussed changesets: 3) | 間違えたのでリバートお願いします commented 2026-06-22 14:44:22 UTC by asaga s ♦3 |
| 184428732 (Comments: 1) | asaga s (Discussed changesets: 3) | 間違えたのでリバートお願いします。 commented 2026-06-22 14:43:30 UTC by asaga s ♦3 |
| 184269508 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 80) | Thank you! I've adjusted the tag. commented 2026-06-22 14:42:18 UTC by Access Claims (komoot) ♦71 |
| 180000306 (Comments: 4) | Inplace Studio (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed blatant SEO spam advertising tags from a highway node in changeset 184435530 https://osm.org/changeset/184435530 commented 2026-06-22 14:41:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 179069174 (Comments: 3) | ZK Painting Ltd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted addition of blatant SEO spam advertising tags to a highway node in changeset 184435361 https://osm.org/changeset/184435361 commented 2026-06-22 14:38:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184408716 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | I can go ahead an work on splitting the carriageways here. I will say though that it is fine to add applicable tags to roads that aren't mapped as they stand in real life. It's better to have one correct thing and one incorrect thing than t... commented 2026-06-22 14:37:07 UTC by Joseph R P ♦446 |
| 184385620 (Comments: 3) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 109) | Já návěstidlům nerozumím..tzn ani nemapuji. Zarazil jsem se nad podivným popisem změn, který spíš vyjadřoval křivdu commented 2026-06-22 14:36:15 UTC by Bisenz ♦1 |
| 180451390 (Comments: 1) | proranksa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Cleaned up name=* in changeset 184434889 https://osm.org/changeset/184434889 commented 2026-06-22 14:27:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180991090 (Comments: 1) | proranksa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Fixed non-existent shop=solar_store tag to closest extant alternative, shop=electrical (even shop=solar would have at least made some logical sense, still very low usage but at least not zero and value makes much more sense as "store" is re... commented 2026-06-22 14:23:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182827205 (Comments: 1) | proranksa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Fixed nonexistent top-level tag for POI in changeset 184434495 https://osm.org/changeset/184434495 commented 2026-06-22 14:18:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180396637 (Comments: 3) | proranksa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Remove SEO spam POI missing any top-level tag and with a malformed/advertising description=* in changeset 184434400 https://osm.org/changeset/184434400 commented 2026-06-22 14:16:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180365698 (Comments: 3) | proranksa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Remove SEO spam POI missing any top-level tag and with a malformed/advertising description=* in changeset 184434400 https://osm.org/changeset/184434400 commented 2026-06-22 14:16:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180361357 (Comments: 3) | proranksa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Remove SEO spam POI missing any top-level tag and with a malformed/advertising description=* in changeset 184434400 https://osm.org/changeset/184434400 commented 2026-06-22 14:16:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184336857 (Comments: 8) | dermoth_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok corrigé, à un détail près, je ne suis pas sûr comment indiquer un flex post permanent. J'ai aussi joint le chat matrix pour demander des clarifications sur certains tags. commented 2026-06-22 14:15:30 UTC by dermoth_ ♦2 |
| 182602661 (Comments: 1) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted adding blatant SEO spam advertising tags to an existing highway node in changeset 184433838 https://osm.org/changeset/184433838 commented 2026-06-22 14:04:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180213553 (Comments: 3) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted adding blatant SEO spam advertising tags to an existing highway node in changeset 184433810 https://osm.org/changeset/184433810 commented 2026-06-22 14:03:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180213410 (Comments: 3) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted adding blatant SEO spam advertising tags to an existing highway node in changeset 184433778 https://osm.org/changeset/184433778 commented 2026-06-22 14:03:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184432637 (Comments: 1) | Thomasje (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag Thomas, Het even wennen aan de conventie van osm. Niet name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Je kunt wel description gebruiken. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-06-22 14:02:12 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 180473070 (Comments: 1) | VISORPRO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cleaned up remaining stray highway nodes added here (after SEO spam tags were already removed) in changeset 184433452 https://osm.org/changeset/184433452 commented 2026-06-22 13:57:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180467516 (Comments: 3) | VISORPRO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cleaned up remaining stray highway nodes added here (after SEO spam tags were already removed) in changeset 184433452 https://osm.org/changeset/184433452 commented 2026-06-22 13:57:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183012157 (Comments: 4) | Geocrest (Discussed changesets: 11) | I've changed it back to highway=tertiary the meantime, because I'm very convinced the change was not correct. Please let me know your conclusion. commented 2026-06-22 13:53:53 UTC by Marvk ♦23 |
| 184327215 (Comments: 2) | Geocrest (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi Till_btn, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-06-22 13:49:05 UTC by Geocrest ♦5 |
| 184319287 (Comments: 2) | Geocrest (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi Senihtu, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-06-22 13:46:27 UTC by Geocrest ♦5 |
| 184428395 (Comments: 1) | VeronicaDonis2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé el conjunto de cambios. Quedó un nodo de interpolación en la vía highway de la calle Buchardo, lo cual no es correcto. Lo separé y acomodé otros segmentos y... commented 2026-06-22 13:45:54 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 181044194 (Comments: 5) | Daniel Čepelák (Discussed changesets: 1) | NB @Mapper220993 , unfortunately this appears to be one of the many thousands of SEO spam accounts on OpenStreetMap; they couldn't care less about the community or the quality of the map, just trying to spam as much as possible for their clients... commented 2026-06-22 13:42:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184421503 (Comments: 1) | Sportifx (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted in changeset/184432732 and add the fitness as node/13957906221 commented 2026-06-22 13:40:45 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦26 |
| 184354209 (Comments: 6) | alblov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Probabilmente un copia & incolla errato oppure un'estensione o il browser stesso che ha auto-completato la casella del nome. Buon mapping, Marco. commented 2026-06-22 13:31:06 UTC by MarcoR ♦600 |
| 182862805 (Comments: 2) | Dripos (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising, malformed tags and on an existing highway node in changeset 184432362 https://osm.org/changeset/184432362 commented 2026-06-22 13:30:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184101675 (Comments: 2) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 114) | thanks, I updated the info! commented 2026-06-22 13:28:06 UTC by holgerd ♦30 |
| 172428170 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_StealthGrid (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sidewalk stubs on Blackstock Road and Rock Street connected to crossings in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184431698 commented 2026-06-22 13:16:29 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,858 |
| 161017051 (Comments: 5) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 147) | Yes, I think that's the same overlay that JOSM has, which comes from https://osm.cycle.travel/ and I've messaged the author to see how up-to-date their data is. commented 2026-06-22 13:13:01 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦318 |
| 177458727 (Comments: 3) | King’s Towing & Recovery LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431592 https://osm.org/changeset/184431592 commented 2026-06-22 13:11:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177548189 (Comments: 3) | Timothy Luke at Honolulu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431568 https://osm.org/changeset/184431568 commented 2026-06-22 13:11:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177612140 (Comments: 3) | Juany Cleaning Service at Austin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431539 https://osm.org/changeset/184431539 commented 2026-06-22 13:10:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177636160 (Comments: 3) | EMS Locksmith Corp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431520 https://osm.org/changeset/184431520 commented 2026-06-22 13:09:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177835467 (Comments: 3) | Fourth Ave Mini Mart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431458 https://osm.org/changeset/184431458 commented 2026-06-22 13:08:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177900154 (Comments: 3) | Ainsley McOsker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431379 https://osm.org/changeset/184431379 commented 2026-06-22 13:07:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184414182 (Comments: 1) | borji (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir. Revisé el conjunto de cambios. Las geometrías me parecen demasiado grandes para ser aproximadas. No indicas la fuente, si las dibujaste sobre una imagen satelital, cuál imagen, o si son geometr&i... commented 2026-06-22 13:04:46 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184410692 (Comments: 1) | Ervius (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Why do you add a layer=-1 to most buildings you mapped ?? They are not underground. When you add them to hide errors, you are doing a bad job. Just solve the issue it caused. Now we have to adjust your mappi... commented 2026-06-22 13:01:53 UTC by Frans S ♦10,686 |
| 183576761 (Comments: 3) | tom-frey (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke commented 2026-06-22 13:00:39 UTC by FroschForscher ♦155 |
| 181574532 (Comments: 2) | Ornelpra (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, effectivement j'ai confondu entre l'autorisation de la pratique et la possibilité matérielle. C'est un chemin/sentier avec roches et racines accessible en VTT mais impossible en vélo de route ou vél... commented 2026-06-22 12:57:11 UTC by Ornelpra ♦1 |
| 176685324 (Comments: 1) | SolarMax_Support (Discussed changesets: 1) | Split SEO POI "Solar Max" from building to node, and cleaned up/improved tagging of both in changeset 184430754 https://osm.org/changeset/184430754 commented 2026-06-22 12:51:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184336571 (Comments: 3) | AV31 (Discussed changesets: 33) | C'est bon, tant que vous faites les mises à jour à la réouverture. Merci! commented 2026-06-22 12:49:19 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦498 |
| 177027614 (Comments: 1) | timrohner (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding POI with malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184430621 https://osm.org/changeset/184430621 commented 2026-06-22 12:47:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 164976603 (Comments: 1) | Mehmet Öz 355 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding duplicate SEO spam POI with malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ) as well as other questionable changes, in changeset 184430532 https://o... commented 2026-06-22 12:46:14 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 176787642 (Comments: 1) | Araç Kiralamak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding duplicate SEO spam POI with malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ) as well as other questionable changes, in changeset 184430532 https://o... commented 2026-06-22 12:46:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184428166 (Comments: 1) | meh106 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. A way tagged as highway=footway in the UK already implies no access for other transport modes, so adding bicycle=no is usually redundant. An exception is where there is a sign explicitly prohibiting cycling on ... commented 2026-06-22 12:39:02 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,858 |
| 177089841 (Comments: 1) | Takeshi K (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted adding malformed road tagging with a source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184430281 https://osm.org/changeset/184430281 commented 2026-06-22 12:38:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 176794511 (Comments: 1) | Luis E Trejo G (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Luis, thanks for adding this place. Unfortunately, opening_hours=9am is not valid opening_hours=* syntax https://osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours , and it does not contain the necessary information (closing time, days of the week) for me to corre... commented 2026-06-22 12:32:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184388119 (Comments: 3) | Maefjus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dzięki, poprawione. commented 2026-06-22 12:30:04 UTC by Maefjus ♦2 |
| 184268419 (Comments: 3) | Maefjus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dzięki za wszystkie komentarze, starałem się wszystko poprawić. Czasami przypadkiem usunąłem, inaczej też widziałem "track" w niektórych miejscach i źle oznaczyłem niektóre nawierzchnie. Przy okazji muszę ... commented 2026-06-22 12:29:29 UTC by Maefjus ♦2 |
| 183909311 (Comments: 3) | Titova Kseniya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Я уже исправил. Можно ничего не делать. commented 2026-06-22 12:28:15 UTC by mavl ♦76,985 |
| 184110627 (Comments: 2) | exarkun (Discussed changesets: 24) | die meistens Rückfragen an exarkun bleiben unbeantwortet, siehe https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=13071070 Von daher viel Glück :) commented 2026-06-22 12:22:26 UTC by derredu ♦74 |
| 184401960 (Comments: 1) | theo998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut, quand tu fais des modifications, essaie d'utiliser des images satellites récentes : à cet endroit les images de Ortho Express 2025 (datant de l'été 2025) sont accessibles et plus adaptées que les... commented 2026-06-22 12:19:55 UTC by Yunan973 ♦124 |
| 184372055 (Comments: 6) | Iahaia Amisse (Discussed changesets: 7) | I've reverted the import - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184429344. commented 2026-06-22 12:13:18 UTC by Solaris07 ♦6 |
| 184429013 (Comments: 1) | opnwez6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nicht Rennerod sondern Rehe commented 2026-06-22 12:04:19 UTC by opnwez6 ♦1 |
| 168491598 (Comments: 3) | flowio (Discussed changesets: 2) | Re-added by the same SEO spammer in changeset 180183133 in addition to changing the address of the existing POI without moving it, and later reverted as described there. https://osm.org/changeset/180183133 commented 2026-06-22 11:55:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180183133 (Comments: 5) | flowio (Discussed changesets: 2) | You tell 'em @SuborbitalPigeon . I give these spammers every bit as much respect and good faith as they give the community. They also changed the address here, without either moving the node or keeping the existing address. I reverted tha... commented 2026-06-22 11:55:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184312212 (Comments: 1) | CIMFX37CW (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi CIMFX37CW, an diesem Ort war die neue Toilette bereits eingetragen, du hast eine Dopplung erzeugt. Diese wurde mittlerweile bereinigt. Und bitte keine Trivialnamen für solche POIs geben. Eine Toilette hat nicht den offiziellen Namen... commented 2026-06-22 11:52:01 UTC by scai ♦284 |
| 182971546 (Comments: 2) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 242) | Dzięki! Dodawałem ostatnio też kilka innych OPP, w nich też ALPR można poprawić. A ta kamera faktycznie została przez pomyłkę. Dodaję te które pojawiają się na stronie Canardu, chociaż patrząc na Kapilary to czasem są ozna... commented 2026-06-22 11:43:59 UTC by kubahahaha ♦465 |
| 184398218 (Comments: 2) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 21) | merhabalar, düzelttim commented 2026-06-22 11:43:24 UTC by Alikam ♦10 |
| 179911756 (Comments: 1) | vane silva (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted changing street name into SHOUTING CASE with likely source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184428076 https://osm.org/changeset/184428076 commented 2026-06-22 11:39:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180564578 (Comments: 2) | vane silva (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted changing street name into SHOUTING CASE with source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184428076 https://osm.org/changeset/184428076 commented 2026-06-22 11:39:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 181494471 (Comments: 2) | Zaneo (Discussed changesets: 16) | This was a typo/fat finger of tree which auto corrected to tram. I’ve fixed to tree row, thanks for the catch! commented 2026-06-22 11:31:07 UTC by Zaneo ♦48 |
| 184420521 (Comments: 1) | Roaming Panda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cambio revertido: no se mapea para el render ni se obtienen mejores datos. Contiene errores de etiquetado https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184427545 commented 2026-06-22 11:23:11 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦291 |
| 184257637 (Comments: 2) | 309_308_307 (Discussed changesets: 18) | sollte jetzt passen commented 2026-06-22 11:21:58 UTC by 309_308_307 ♦43 |
| 173729739 (Comments: 2) | AndresDuhour (Discussed changesets: 22) | Gracias Federico! Me di cuenta en otras ediciones que el complemento de JOSM para agregar direcciones me cambiaba la ciudad. Debe haber sido eso que lo agregó sin que me de cuenta. commented 2026-06-22 11:19:28 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦146 |
| 184387338 (Comments: 1) | Skoda84 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id:184427299 commented 2026-06-22 11:17:14 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 181239854 (Comments: 2) | pgajoch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding POI tags with source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184427222 https://osm.org/changeset/184427222 commented 2026-06-22 11:14:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 184390576 (Comments: 1) | 久久津乳酪本舖 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 184426993 commented 2026-06-22 11:07:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
 | 184401815 (Comments: 2) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 11) | There are some moments to be see in life to continue drawing this area, it's under construction commented 2026-06-22 10:58:35 UTC by iuvi ♦20 |
| 184376701 (Comments: 1) | izaan is best xjdhhd hsgdgs s (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:184426671 commented 2026-06-22 10:58:24 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 184423585 (Comments: 2) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Road is istill under construction, It will be fixed after second side of road will be finished commented 2026-06-22 10:56:18 UTC by iuvi ♦20 |
| 184415425 (Comments: 2) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Done commented 2026-06-22 10:54:56 UTC by iuvi ♦20 |
| 172445209 (Comments: 3) | YacoobPL (Discussed changesets: 53) | Cześć, wrysowywałem projekt z dokumentów przetargowych więc powinny być okej, natomiast pamiętam że miałem bardzo ograniczone obiekty do georeferencji - być może coś się posypało. Zweryfikuję i dam znać, dzięki za cynk! commented 2026-06-22 10:18:34 UTC by YacoobPL ♦33 |
| 184403253 (Comments: 6) | marckdbreejen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wederom bedankt voor het aanpassen van de tags en icoontje. Is echt heel behulpzaam. De naam wil ik graag zo laten staan, is in lijn met de feitelijke situatie en Apple maps, Google maps, ec. commented 2026-06-22 10:13:17 UTC by marckdbreejen ♦1 |
| 177646840 (Comments: 3) | AgenceWAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Split SEO POI out to separate POI node rather than invalid nested building inside building that is not a separate structure or housenumber, and fixed/cleaned up remaining SEO and malformed tagging, in changeset 184424725 https://osm.org/change... commented 2026-06-22 10:09:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177638765 (Comments: 3) | AgenceWAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Split SEO POI out to separate POI node rather than invalid nested building inside building that is not a separate structure or housenumber, and fixed/cleaned up remaining SEO and malformed tagging, in changeset 184424725 https://osm.org/change... commented 2026-06-22 10:09:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177602071 (Comments: 5) | AgenceWAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Split SEO POI out to separate POI node rather than invalid nested building inside building that is not a separate structure or housenumber, and fixed/cleaned up remaining SEO and malformed tagging, in changeset 184424725 https://osm.org/change... commented 2026-06-22 10:09:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 137103421 (Comments: 1) | Batistacavera (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hej, I saw you created a bunch of charging stations here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10963867112/history/1#map=19/57.693150/11.973051. However I think the correct way to map these is as a single charging_station and multiple charge_points: ht... commented 2026-06-22 10:07:55 UTC by wombatmaper ♦97 |
| 177762752 (Comments: 1) | AgenceWAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Split SEO POI "Agence WAM Mulhouse" out to separate POI node rather than nested building inside building that is not a separate structure or housenumber, and fixed/cleaned up remaining SEO and malformed tagging, in changeset 184424553 |
| 184182347 (Comments: 5) | iuvi (Discussed changesets: 11) | iD and its quirks is not the authority on OSM tags. You can learn about standard tagging from the OSM Wiki and from mapping across different parts of the world. If a mapper selects “School building” in iD, and that produces only a buildin... commented 2026-06-22 09:56:27 UTC by CRCulver ♦234 |
| 183918550 (Comments: 3) | topolab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Well, there is this scheme. All existing nodes are from one import and the tag is not really in use, but I think it is quite useful here as well: calibration:datum = EPSG:2100 calibration:lat = 98.324143 calibration:lon = 12.123 commented 2026-06-22 09:54:17 UTC by mueschel ♦7,198 |
| 184389475 (Comments: 2) | meteor83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just a couple notes. This left proposed=footway on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346637395 . If the main highway value changed, then the life-cycle qualifier needs to also be removed. The new ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2026-06-22 09:51:51 UTC by HellMap ♦927 |
 | 177504745 (Comments: 1) | Leabheng (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO POI with source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184423869 https://osm.org/changeset/184423869 commented 2026-06-22 09:51:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177747811 (Comments: 1) | soport21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam tags and also fixed POI name ALLCAPS in changeset 184423806 https://osm.org/changeset/184423806 commented 2026-06-22 09:49:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 80196889 (Comments: 1) | Mathnasium (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO, etc. tags for POI in changeset 184423582 https://osm.org/changeset/184423582 commented 2026-06-22 09:44:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183738074 (Comments: 4) | WinstonSmith (Discussed changesets: 3) | Grazie, ottima idea. Lo inserisco subito anche qui! commented 2026-06-22 09:43:01 UTC by WinstonSmith ♦4 |
| 177830209 (Comments: 1) | EJ Layco (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi EJ Layco, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Per the OSM wiki, the name=* key is for "the primary name of the feature in the real world", i.e. what a common citizen of this city would call it in everyday conversation. The "offi... commented 2026-06-22 09:41:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184362648 (Comments: 2) | Peter_v_Aalst (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Michael, danke für den Hinweis. Das war mir nicht bewusst. Ich hatte lediglich recherchiert, dass Google Map und vergleichbare Kartendienste nicht als Quelle taugen. Ich hatte einige Nomady-Einträge rund um den Schillinger Berg ges... commented 2026-06-22 09:34:33 UTC by Peter_v_Aalst ♦4 |
| 177830349 (Comments: 1) | EJ Layco (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding name=* with source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184422989 https://osm.org/changeset/184422989 commented 2026-06-22 09:32:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184177370 (Comments: 2) | borishag (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hallo, Ik zal proberen om hier in de toekomst rekening mee te houden. Daar het in NL niet is toegestaan om een BAG node te wissen laten we de nodes leeg acher als een winkel vertrokken is. Borishag commented 2026-06-22 09:31:47 UTC by borishag ♦162 |
| 177713921 (Comments: 1) | scottsdalepbs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184422907 https://osm.org/changeset/184422907 commented 2026-06-22 09:30:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177786123 (Comments: 1) | AuroraElapses (Discussed changesets: 2) | 不是哥们，6062年了哪来的家乐福，我早就全部删光了，你怎么还把它弄复活了 commented 2026-06-22 09:23:38 UTC by Taksine ♦170 |
| 184313497 (Comments: 2) | aibek55 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Спасибо что заметили, все исправил! commented 2026-06-22 09:20:36 UTC by aibek55 ♦1 |
| 184384956 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 629) | Thank you for reverting your changes! Have a nice day! commented 2026-06-22 09:10:43 UTC by keepright! ler ♦44 |
| 184085057 (Comments: 3) | FirefighterCGH (Discussed changesets: 28) | Dann habe ich den Änderungssatz falsch interpretiert. commented 2026-06-22 09:08:53 UTC by essich ♦9 |
| 184378959 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thank you, I will have a look. Although there definitely seems to be some sort of bug in CoMaps commented 2026-06-22 09:05:22 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦383 |
| 184409695 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello Youness_ss, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Algeria. I have some inquiries about your recent edits. In this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184372478 The changeset comment indicates that the edit was i... commented 2026-06-22 09:04:32 UTC by Mohamed_Taha ♦21 |
| 149351945 (Comments: 1) | cri_cri58 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao cri_cri58 Non c'è nessun sentiero qui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267686192 , ne' risultano tracce di passaggio su OSM o sulle heatmaps. Puoi rendere pubblica la traccia originale e fornire qualche dettaglio ? Grazie commented 2026-06-22 09:03:08 UTC by dp7 ♦91 |
| 184380476 (Comments: 2) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 337) | Dann war ich wohl der erste der drüber gefahren ist. Der Asphalt war aber nicht mehr warm. Ein Foto: https://uploadnow.io/f/Cs0s9yL Viele Grüße commented 2026-06-22 08:58:05 UTC by geozeisig ♦240 |
| 184115722 (Comments: 11) | Martini097 (Discussed changesets: 11) | thanks for your patience. i've just submitted the updated keys. If i've still not quite got it correct please change them as you see fit - many thanks for your help so far commented 2026-06-22 08:55:31 UTC by Martini097 ♦14 |
| 184376125 (Comments: 1) | Prime Adventure Outfitters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype in description=* and malformed tags/values in changeset 184421103 https://osm.org/changeset/184421103 commented 2026-06-22 08:42:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184405783 (Comments: 1) | Black Sky Coffee (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184421039 https://osm.org/changeset/184421039 commented 2026-06-22 08:40:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184373032 (Comments: 1) | Leadville ATV Tours (Discussed changesets: 2) | You can keep re-adding your SEO spam and nonsensical tags, but they will keep being reverted unless and until they conform to all OSM standards, conventions and best practices. Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and s... commented 2026-06-22 08:38:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184414334 (Comments: 1) | tastycrackers (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20854 You've edited some of these objects dozens of times in the last few days. Most of these didn't even do anything to this object. commented 2026-06-22 08:37:50 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,685 |
| 181753656 (Comments: 2) | Optiml (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, Vielen Dank für die Bemerkungen und die Änderungen. Das ist alles nachvollziehbar und sieht nun gut aus. Den erwähnten Knoten habe ich entfernt. Grüße! commented 2026-06-22 08:29:20 UTC by Optiml ♦3 |
| 177919433 (Comments: 3) | Hopewell Family Dentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184420626 https://osm.org/changeset/184420626 commented 2026-06-22 08:29:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178049280 (Comments: 3) | Comfortly AC Repair West Palm Beach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted changeset 178049280 adding a SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags at a residential house with no likely verifiable POI on the ground, in changeset 184420533 https://osm.org/changeset/184420533 commented 2026-06-22 08:26:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177972709 (Comments: 1) | Zafer Partisi Konyaaltı İlçe Başkanlığı (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with spam/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184420454 https://osm.org/changeset/184420454 commented 2026-06-22 08:24:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177973794 (Comments: 1) | Zafer Partisi Konyaaltı İlçe Başkanlığı (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with spam/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184420454 https://osm.org/changeset/184420454 commented 2026-06-22 08:23:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184066146 (Comments: 2) | gsperb (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hi Look here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysqn-NA4QhM If you look closely at Bing via JOSM, you can see some runway boundaries, and I myself have seen planes taking off there in the summer gerd commented 2026-06-22 08:20:42 UTC by gsperb ♦48 |
| 184091164 (Comments: 2) | samgio183 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Danke. commented 2026-06-22 08:19:42 UTC by samgio183 ♦3 |
 | 168571300 (Comments: 1) | RayhanSarkarRabby (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184420300 https://osm.org/changeset/184420300 commented 2026-06-22 08:19:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178507711 (Comments: 1) | RayhanSarkarRabby (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted changeset adding SEO POI from Google Maps, which is not allowed per both OSM and Google's policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184420162 https://osm.org/changeset/184420162 commented 2026-06-22 08:16:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178341257 (Comments: 1) | FarshadGh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Split SEO POI fom apartment building and fix/clean up tags for both in changeset 184419996 https://osm.org/changeset/184419996 commented 2026-06-22 08:11:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184252783 (Comments: 1) | Ivan Lukianov (Discussed changesets: 1) | You already mapped it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529640405 commented 2026-06-22 08:09:44 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 180148865 (Comments: 1) | Nomadic45 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merged three duplicate objects for SEO "Tipid Camp Baguio" guest house POI, cleaned up tags and removed it from administrative boundary relation it was inexplicably added to, in changeset 184419661 https://osm.org/changeset/184419661 commented 2026-06-22 08:02:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180147590 (Comments: 1) | Nomadic45 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merged three duplicate objects for SEO "Tipid Camp Baguio" guest house POI, cleaned up tags and removed it from administrative boundary relation it was inexplicably added to, in changeset 184419661 https://osm.org/changeset/184419661 commented 2026-06-22 08:02:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184419488 (Comments: 1) | Lachgast (Discussed changesets: 55) | Voortbouwend op wijzigingenset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46490826 van toposheep, destijds ingetekende park verwijderd, vervangen voor woongebied met dezelfde naamgeving. commented 2026-06-22 08:01:38 UTC by Lachgast ♦139 |
| 183825813 (Comments: 2) | sehukoza (Discussed changesets: 6) | Klopt, dat zag ik gistermiddag ook toen ik er toevallig langsfietste, ik was nog compleet in de veronderstelling dat het er nog lag. Dank voor het aanpassen! commented 2026-06-22 07:56:59 UTC by sehukoza ♦4 |
| 177974735 (Comments: 1) | Chandra Sekhar Csk Kilari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Remove restaurant POI from multiple highway route relations it was inexplicably added to for apparent SEO purposes in changeset 184419334 https://osm.org/changeset/184419334 commented 2026-06-22 07:55:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 174297605 (Comments: 1) | KelaFuti (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13285536907 is the same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12124115850 commented 2026-06-22 07:42:38 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
| 184418839 (Comments: 1) | Swingman7000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is a local spot known only by the surrounding neighborhoods. This is a local name widely used by this community commented 2026-06-22 07:39:03 UTC by Swingman7000 ♦1 |
| 184360689 (Comments: 2) | Jvitegem (Discussed changesets: 35) | Maar een paar wegen worden momenteel aangelegd, de rest nog niet. commented 2026-06-22 07:06:59 UTC by Jvitegem ♦22 |
| 184412298 (Comments: 1) | samho1234567 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Please note that Youtube cannot be used as a source for OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184417534 commented 2026-06-22 06:55:11 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
 | 183977568 (Comments: 1) | Ctrl+shiftF5 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi Ctrl+shiftF5. On what basis’s have changed the classification the way is not used by the public which not an main highway it was leading to a formland tertiary is not at suitable here i will correct the here t Thankyou commented 2026-06-22 06:39:49 UTC by BerryTrails ♦14 |
| 181788713 (Comments: 1) | Coslog (Discussed changesets: 4) | When you editing, please use the local language (formation) as the name tag, thanks. Else, I and other editors will revert or change it anyway. commented 2026-06-22 06:05:53 UTC by Herman Lee ♦413 |
| 184413673 (Comments: 1) | gigakv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вы умеете соблюдать правила, вы замечательный человек. Желаю вам всего наилучшего в будущем! commented 2026-06-22 05:20:09 UTC by Taksine ♦170 |
| 182331809 (Comments: 1) | sadaskdj2eek230230 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sind https://osm.org/node/4143174686 https://osm.org/node/13805885701 Und (mit den meisten versionen) https://osm.org/node/4143174685 Nicht alle dasselbe objekt? Oder gibt es davon tatsächlich drei stück vor ort? commented 2026-06-22 05:01:30 UTC by cyton ♦224 |
| 184352392 (Comments: 5) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 43) | I won't be back in Nice until autumn, but Costed et Bellonte seems like plausible candidate commented 2026-06-22 04:58:42 UTC by Snusmumriken ♦160 |
| 184207954 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi isotopicmoting, My name is Surander, and I work as a mapper with the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for reporting this issue. The mistake was not intended to convey anything more specific; it was an inadvertent oversight on my part. Please ... commented 2026-06-22 04:40:41 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦15 |
| 184317001 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 179) | 请不要将未开通的车站添加到线路关系。 Please do not add unopened stations to the route relation. commented 2026-06-22 04:04:01 UTC by qgmzmy ♦3 |
| 164102459 (Comments: 3) | MilkTeaaa (Discussed changesets: 6) | It looks like it will suggest this for any object, not just elevators. I have an opened an issue with iD for this: https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/2354 commented 2026-06-22 03:42:12 UTC by Joel Koen ♦7 |
| 178432049 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | Oh, I thought you were answering the first question (about your use of the normally prohibited Google Maps as a source), since they were presumptive derived from that source and my second question didn't mention anything related to those tags, b... commented 2026-06-22 03:39:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦252 |
| X | 184402234 (Comments: 1) | kaariim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Kaarlim, could you explain what you were trying to do with this changeset? It looks like you took a road from the US, moved it to Senegal and turned it in to some sort of representation of a administrative boundary (but missing any appropri... commented 2026-06-22 03:30:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦252 |
| 184392757 (Comments: 2) | streetfighter101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ist nicht ganz eindeutig. Als großer Schriftzug steht "HaarStyle" über der Tür, im Logo steht "Hawa Style". Im Gespräch und im Internet Auftritt nennen sie sich "Hawa Style", daher habe ich das als p... commented 2026-06-22 03:19:57 UTC by streetfighter101 ♦1 |
| 8127421 (Comments: 2) | JessAk71 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Thanks, yes of course. Back 15 years ago that was a more open ended open space tag, nowadays it is more specific to certain locations etc as you say. I have gone and removed the way for it especially since then this area has been more fully mapped. A... commented 2026-06-22 03:12:19 UTC by JessAk71 ♦126 |
| 184405167 (Comments: 1) | Marm1981 (Discussed changesets: 1) | highway=service is not the appropriate tag for service/frontage roads. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice . commented 2026-06-22 02:20:55 UTC by NE2 ♦13 |
| 184400601 (Comments: 1) | Bloomenwease (Discussed changesets: 8) | operator=Volksbank entfernt commented 2026-06-22 01:29:54 UTC by Bienson ♦595 |
| 179563640 (Comments: 2) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 44) | oh my. Those are part of a bag of data that I used to build the MR challenge. I'll take a look. Thanks for letting me know! commented 2026-06-22 00:34:04 UTC by watmildon ♦310 |
| 184404568 (Comments: 1) | eduutenorioo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Quando a Rua possui divisão ímpar e par no caso postal_code:side:even\t32642-250 postal_code:side:odd\t32642-315 deve se ter pelo menos um ponto de endereço para ser detectado no Nominatim https://tools.geofabrik... commented 2026-06-22 00:27:53 UTC by Lucas Santana ♦11 |
| 184409455 (Comments: 1) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 42) | See issue: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6886 commented 2026-06-21 23:57:33 UTC by wombatmaper ♦97 |
| 184409579 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 59) | the park will eventually be torn down for the expansion of the cemetery commented 2026-06-21 23:56:22 UTC by ieguy3 ♦59 |
| 181414964 (Comments: 2) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 339) | presumably the maxspeed is meant, yes commented 2026-06-21 23:46:18 UTC by b-unicycling ♦291 |
| 184408648 (Comments: 1) | Vice City (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on the latest aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-06-21 23:06:22 UTC by Udarian ♦780 |
| 184314503 (Comments: 2) | irik (Discussed changesets: 37) | Siemka, niestety ten fragment trasy poprawiałem na podstawie mapy gminy i nie wiem jak tam wygląda sytuacja w terenie, czy to CPR, czy chodnik. :/ commented 2026-06-21 23:01:56 UTC by irik ♦46 |
| 184281662 (Comments: 2) | WiFox (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2s0Q Tym zapytaniem możesz wyświetlić wszystkie fragmenty z niejasnym tagowaniem, które wymagają prawdopodobnie poprawy. commented 2026-06-21 22:46:57 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184301507 (Comments: 1) | Przecicinek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cześć, jeśli są tu CPRy np. tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226795076 to ich tagowanie powinno zostać poprawione zgodnie z wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w |
| 184199008 (Comments: 2) | A-TinTin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für deinen Kommentar. Die Grenze war vorher schon durch den Wald vorgegeben. Ich habe nur das Innere gefüllt, denn fast das ganze ehemalige Militärgebiet ist ja jetzt dichter Urwald und schön zum spazieren. Sichtbare ... commented 2026-06-21 22:39:44 UTC by A-TinTin ♦1 |
| 184402967 (Comments: 1) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 78) | Cześć, w tej zmianie linia taka jak ta ma nieprawidłowe tagowanie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531252043 Zachęcam do poprawy zgodnie z wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3... commented 2026-06-21 22:25:28 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184406545 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Em 2023 oedificio ainda existia, fotos ESRI actuais confirmam a sua demoloção. Um edificio ilegal deve ser mapeado, pois existe no terreno commented 2026-06-21 21:40:41 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 142639956 (Comments: 2) | SirCowMan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Yes, that's the same. I have no problems as proposed. commented 2026-06-21 21:39:37 UTC by SirCowMan ♦7 |
| 184406884 (Comments: 1) | MisturJoesturr (Discussed changesets: 2) | elinize sağlık commented 2026-06-21 21:29:36 UTC by yitimox ♦26 |
| 183746628 (Comments: 4) | Fjana (Discussed changesets: 43) | Zdravím. Rozdíl v admin_level=10 a admin_level=11 spočívá v tom, že pro ty na admin_level=10 existují správní orgány (v tomto případě výbory městských část&iacu... commented 2026-06-21 21:27:03 UTC by Fjana ♦41 |
| 146729012 (Comments: 1) | bartekl9 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5270329 commented 2026-06-21 21:05:38 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184386783 (Comments: 3) | Nicktarix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, ich habe den Weg erst einmal „sichern“ wollen. Ich habe den westlichen Abschnitt heute vor zwei Wochen fotografiert, ich musste die Bilder erst einmal raussuchen. Problematisch ist der nicht gemähte Wegesrand in Verbindu... commented 2026-06-21 20:36:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 40021229 (Comments: 2) | Rom1 (Discussed changesets: 66) | The fixme tag is not from me, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2341016099/history/1 commented 2026-06-21 20:35:24 UTC by Rom1 ♦411 |
| 184401957 (Comments: 1) | bert_df (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo bert_df, willkommen bei osm und danke für deine Initiative. Ich habe hier ein wenig nachgebessert. Beim Verwenden von gps-tracks daran denken, dass diese fast immer einen kleinen Versatz haben und Wege eckig erscheinen lass... commented 2026-06-21 20:21:35 UTC by limes11 ♦1,049 |
| 184177688 (Comments: 3) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | The revert was not because the data was bad but because the import did not follow the import process. commented 2026-06-21 20:19:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,683 |
| 177956088 (Comments: 3) | Current Physical Therapy Meridian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184404916 https://osm.org/changeset/184404916 commented 2026-06-21 20:15:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178467481 (Comments: 1) | Current Physical Therapy Nampa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184404898 https://osm.org/changeset/184404898 commented 2026-06-21 20:13:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178530501 (Comments: 2) | Farmer Brown Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184404860 https://osm.org/changeset/184404860 commented 2026-06-21 20:12:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184381642 (Comments: 4) | PWDW (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks commented 2026-06-21 20:06:59 UTC by PWDW ♦1 |
| 184353771 (Comments: 1) | dermoth_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bon je viens de réaliser comment sont indiqués les sens inverses, je vais remettre cycleway:left=lane commented 2026-06-21 20:00:22 UTC by dermoth_ ♦2 |
| 184404491 (Comments: 1) | s777n (Discussed changesets: 14) | Исправлено commented 2026-06-21 20:00:20 UTC by s777n ♦323 |
| 183863812 (Comments: 2) | FPEG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Guten abend. Ich bin den "Weg" von Aselfingen nochmals hochgefahren oder besser gesagt hochgelaufen. Ab ca. 200 liegen Baumstämme und kleinere Bäume wachsen schon auf dem Weg. Diesen Weg gibt es definitiv nicht mehr. Gerne kann ic... commented 2026-06-21 19:55:40 UTC by FPEG ♦1 |
| 184346625 (Comments: 1) | Sakari_N (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you, I have indeed forgotten to add them! Will make a note for future! commented 2026-06-21 19:32:38 UTC by Lieckio ♦21 |
| 184345252 (Comments: 1) | Surveyor20786 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In this changeset you edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141215585 to change it to highway=footway + surface=asphalt , yet at both ends it connects to two highway=track ways. Can I just check that the new tagging is correct? D... commented 2026-06-21 19:23:47 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦318 |
| 179378110 (Comments: 1) | Murali3 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Murali3, please note that because of Utah's unusual street names, we have a wiki page dedicated to it: https://osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions. According to those guidelines, the correct way to tag this street is: name="2475 West" ... commented 2026-06-21 19:17:30 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦118 |
| 184370358 (Comments: 1) | ChanFry (Discussed changesets: 1) | I should have said "Mohawk Drive" (instead of "Road"). Regardless, there is no road or drive or street of any kind in this location. commented 2026-06-21 19:03:45 UTC by ChanFry ♦1 |
| 182359635 (Comments: 5) | samon53 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you for the confirmation, It sounds like we might have a variant of this design, because it is highly unusual for this design of Parcel Postbox to have a solar panel. According to the images of the boxes that I have found, they have been Parcel... commented 2026-06-21 19:03:28 UTC by eastender ♦38 |
| 169299530 (Comments: 1) | mfbehrens (Discussed changesets: 31) | im Bau ist da aber erst was im westlichen Teil (dort sogar schon fertig) commented 2026-06-21 18:52:31 UTC by Scout Jens ♦311 |
| 184289750 (Comments: 2) | Koryos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, Mein Fehler, natürlich sind Land- und Forstwirtschaft erlaubt. commented 2026-06-21 18:50:25 UTC by Koryos ♦1 |
| 184355735 (Comments: 4) | a-sav (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you, I appreciate the feedback! It's my pleasure, seeing the map being populated with missing stuff is extremely satisfying commented 2026-06-21 18:48:53 UTC by a-sav ♦9 |
| 175378928 (Comments: 1) | Ambj2848 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I see that you've added sidewalk=no on a bunch of footpaths. Typically the tag is used on roads to denote if there are parallel sidewalks to it ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk?uselang=en ). If you want to specify ... commented 2026-06-21 18:40:36 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦2 |
| 178149763 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | As mentioned, I was referring to the website=*, not the name, at least per what you stated in the changeset source tag. It should be easy to independently find that URL without (at least directly) relying on Google Maps as a source, which is propriet... commented 2026-06-21 18:33:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦252 |
| 178022018 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | Sorry, but I'm not following how any of that is supposed to justify using an explicitly prohibited source. By contrast, Google being the _only_ source for the name makes all the risks and problems of copying it from them much more severe, both t... commented 2026-06-21 18:33:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦252 |
| 184199979 (Comments: 1) | wvdp (Discussed changesets: 157) | Hi wvdp, what is your source for naming the datacenter you added here as name=Verizon? That's a value I would expect to belong instead to operator=* commented 2026-06-21 18:30:37 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦118 |
| 184352765 (Comments: 2) | GetJaded (Discussed changesets: 1) | That's unintentional, you're welcome to revert the whole changeset. Only the "no u turn" was intended but that's less important than fixing the carpark access. My bad! commented 2026-06-21 18:16:26 UTC by GetJaded ♦1 |
 | 168780898 (Comments: 1) | intelligentinfo (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset seems to have many duplicates related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168753151 of the same user. Duplicates were hopefully removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184401000 commented 2026-06-21 18:14:12 UTC by zstadler ♦1,136 |
| 168753151 (Comments: 1) | intelligentinfo (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset seems to have many duplicates related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168780898 of the same user. Duplicates were hopefully removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184401000 commented 2026-06-21 18:14:06 UTC by zstadler ♦1,136 |
| 184372975 (Comments: 6) | Angus Lee (Discussed changesets: 2) | 2. And don't use brackets in `name=` which is for proper names only. Use `description:zh=` commented 2026-06-21 18:07:43 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,929 |
| 184361487 (Comments: 4) | LonelyStrider (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you! commented 2026-06-21 18:02:34 UTC by LonelyStrider ♦2 |
| 184398128 (Comments: 2) | LonelyStrider (Discussed changesets: 2) | yes, it would be nice, if you can fix that way according Strava heatmap. commented 2026-06-21 17:49:09 UTC by LonelyStrider ♦2 |
| 181402567 (Comments: 1) | Henkka888 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Siinä tapauksessa korjaa tägit, älä poista commented 2026-06-21 17:43:49 UTC by frspp ♦3 |
| 171134179 (Comments: 1) | Tóth Dániel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Ha épületeket rajzolsz, a Q gombbal (vagy jobbmenüs parancsból) tudod derékszögesíteni. És az sem árt, ha az épület mérete, alakja és pozíci... commented 2026-06-21 17:31:59 UTC by itineris ♦423 |
| 184393112 (Comments: 1) | CorwR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Adresinfo verwijderd commented 2026-06-21 17:26:46 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 183960723 (Comments: 1) | Feurio! (Discussed changesets: 11) | Wurde das Gebäude wirklich abgerissen? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183960723 commented 2026-06-21 17:23:27 UTC by FroschForscher ♦155 |
| 184144582 (Comments: 2) | Yuri Matias (Discussed changesets: 3) | Porque você reverteu Yuri Matias, as velocidades nas vias locias estavam corretas! commented 2026-06-21 17:13:56 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa ♦1 |
| 184378210 (Comments: 1) | paxx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, in den Weg ist Kies. bzw. Split eingearbeitet. Nach der Wiki-Definition ist das kein "dirt", siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface=dirt?uselang=de Viele Grüße commented 2026-06-21 16:59:43 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184385427 (Comments: 1) | bernd_ne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, der Name ist bereits hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491521766 eingetragen, ich habe deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht. Viele Grüße commented 2026-06-21 16:54:59 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184397592 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 629) | tak to bez sensu nie ja to budowałem czy projektowałem commented 2026-06-21 16:34:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 183797575 (Comments: 2) | 旧加卷 (Discussed changesets: 12) | http://www.dongying.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=d71a6e7a7708418185998768fb99fac7.pdf https://ncstatic-file.clewm.net/rsrc/2023/0209/17/68e249508d2519b7d48a475b96722c29.pdf https://www.laizhou.gov.cn/api-gateway/jp... commented 2026-06-21 16:20:27 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦74 |
| 183875955 (Comments: 2) | Stray_is (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, perdonami, sono nuova nelle modifiche. Ho controllato meglio e ha effettivamente un nome: "CUBO Velostazione". L'edificio di fianco indicato come "Urbica Velostazione" in realtà è un locale (sempre legat... commented 2026-06-21 16:15:09 UTC by Stray_is ♦1 |
| 184328624 (Comments: 1) | supervise7745 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to Open Street Map. Driveways are a valid feature to be added to the OSM database, Please do not remove them. commented 2026-06-21 16:13:36 UTC by MassCartog ♦403 |
| 184392795 (Comments: 2) | CorwR (Discussed changesets: 2) | De adressen heb ik weer verwijderd. commented 2026-06-21 16:11:35 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184386197 (Comments: 1) | -=- Tino -=- (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback access=no en locked=yes lijkt me wel pragmatisch getagd. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-21 16:05:33 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184349228 (Comments: 6) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Sprawdziłem jeszcze geoportal powiatu, i droga ta znajduje się na działce gminnej. Dopiero w okolicach mostu wychodzi z działki gminnej i idzie kawałek na północ od niej. Sam most też jest przesunięty względem tego jak działka gminna... commented 2026-06-21 16:05:28 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 184385439 (Comments: 1) | Snektron (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-21 16:03:54 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184373194 (Comments: 4) | jjoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Entendió bien. Al tener alturas distintas, ya se considera una unidad distinta en OSM y debe ser dibujada por separado (building:part). Le puso 4 pisos a toda una estructura, la que claramente tiene segmentos que son de más o de m... commented 2026-06-21 15:57:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 184338742 (Comments: 1) | Localjohn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to Open Street Map. In this changeset you removed valid roadway features. These changes were incorrect and have been reverted. commented 2026-06-21 15:55:53 UTC by MassCartog ♦403 |
| 184368110 (Comments: 2) | Jyn Pat (Discussed changesets: 1) | I went ahead and changed it back to an alley. Please let me know why you believe it should be a pedestian way. commented 2026-06-21 15:53:20 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 183879546 (Comments: 1) | Davide Albertini (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao, per creare un parco non si usa un nodo, ma va disegnata un'area per l'effettiva estensione dello stesso. commented 2026-06-21 15:32:14 UTC by Samuele Battarra ♦65 |
| 178469372 (Comments: 1) | NemoRemo88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo NemoRemo88, eine Frage zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529257459/history .. Was ist denn eine "Buschle Loungé" und warum ist sie 67 m hoch? Viele Grüße, Thomas commented 2026-06-21 15:17:56 UTC by söm4324 ♦60 |
| 184393020 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | As vias são desenhadas no OSM, sejam privadas ou não, apenas porque existem no terreno; O OSM tenta reproduzir o que existe no terreno. Se essas vias são privadas, tem acesso proibido ou outro condicionamento, adiciona-se a ... commented 2026-06-21 15:11:31 UTC by luisforte ♦141 |
| 183177595 (Comments: 2) | Galbinus (Discussed changesets: 127) | Danke für den Hinweis, da hatte ich was übersehen beim Umwandeln von Kahlschlagfläche in inzwischen dort wieder wachsenden Wald. commented 2026-06-21 15:06:39 UTC by Galbinus ♦165 |
| 184376662 (Comments: 1) | John Thomas Adams (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the additions! commented 2026-06-21 14:31:49 UTC by smichae ♦16 |
| 184231014 (Comments: 2) | HellMap (Discussed changesets: 104) | What is your comment supposed to mean? I did not say anything about AI here. LIDAR is in many locations more than a decade old and cannot be reliably used by itself. And the track going that far is neither visible on LIDAR nor latest aerial. I... commented 2026-06-21 14:26:57 UTC by HellMap ♦927 |
| 184240893 (Comments: 7) | W1mpie13 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Up to you.. Je selecteert de omtrek van de begraafplaats. Zoekt de regel met name.. op en past evt de naam aan. Wanneer de andere naam ook nog in gebruik is kun je alt_name toevoegen. Succes, eggie commented 2026-06-21 14:21:50 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 177222029 (Comments: 1) | JustWebdesign (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gibt es das Ladengeschäft an dieser Strasse noch? Die Adresse wurde als Friedrichstrasse eingetragen, ist das Geschäft umgezogen? commented 2026-06-21 14:07:33 UTC by mtmail ♦170 |
| 184384499 (Comments: 1) | Archeologie (Discussed changesets: 7) | You created a duplicate of Restaurant Le syana in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11085684655 , which one is correctly located ? commented 2026-06-21 13:58:15 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦242 |
| 181312761 (Comments: 1) | Maris_av (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sveiki, Lūdzu nepievieno public_transport=platform uz highway=platform ceļiem no redaktora labojuma, ja pati pietura ir kartēta kā atsevišķs punkts. Jo tad sanāk divas pieturas vienā vietā. Un visādi StreetComplete divas reizes... commented 2026-06-21 13:51:05 UTC by HellMap ♦927 |
| 184388942 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 3) | According to Google Maps, it's a big parking lot. There it no road there. commented 2026-06-21 13:47:31 UTC by namabile ♦1 |
| 184388547 (Comments: 2) | Dodko (Discussed changesets: 47) | If you know which part is not charged, edit it. commented 2026-06-21 13:37:10 UTC by Dodko ♦1,352 |
| 184341358 (Comments: 2) | Ruslan Fatih (Discussed changesets: 20) | Хорошо. Спасибо большое за уточнение. commented 2026-06-21 13:05:23 UTC by Ruslan Fatih ♦55 |
| 184387375 (Comments: 1) | DouceLuvango (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello, after this changeset the border of Idjwi is broken: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12766434#map=14/-2.45667/28.86117 Can you please fix this? commented 2026-06-21 13:02:20 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦49 |
| 184388957 (Comments: 1) | B252697 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Sorry I meant grass areas commented 2026-06-21 12:57:06 UTC by B252697 ♦51 |
| 184261839 (Comments: 2) | Polar Rover (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alright, thanks commented 2026-06-21 12:56:51 UTC by Polar Rover ♦1 |
| 184001988 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM5 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Спасибо большое, что исправили! commented 2026-06-21 12:49:02 UTC by Ozon OSM5 ♦2 |
| 184376401 (Comments: 1) | ChristopherMartinez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Quedaron addr: en highway, en Estrada. Los nombres no van todo en mayúsculas. Telegram: osm_ar. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184376401 commented 2026-06-21 12:48:12 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 182247590 (Comments: 1) | GNNADY-D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вы редактируете объекты в OpenStreetMap и меняете им названия, которых у них нет. Добавьте нужные вам объекты в метки и редактируйте их как ... commented 2026-06-21 12:43:02 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 182279785 (Comments: 1) | Steppe Axel (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2026-06-21 12:39:57 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 184388297 (Comments: 1) | TrickyFoxy (Discussed changesets: 55) | Точнее по правкам commented 2026-06-21 12:38:50 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 184243394 (Comments: 2) | enfinety (Discussed changesets: 3) | Actually looking closer you can see the scars from where there used to be a road (mostly the drainage makes a couple low spots along the sides of where the road used to be, with the fence mostly being ever slightly west). Wouldn't surprise me i... commented 2026-06-21 12:36:31 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,451 |
| 180422773 (Comments: 2) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 13) | OK, I will. commented 2026-06-21 12:35:36 UTC by 349179440 ♦11 |
| 167817677 (Comments: 1) | OlegaSh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравсвуйте. Вы заменили теги пешеходные переходов с светофором на просто светофор. Посмотрите примеры как правильно отмечать переходы... commented 2026-06-21 12:26:14 UTC by s777n ♦323 |
| 184191640 (Comments: 5) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Mais sont encore sacralisées* commented 2026-06-21 12:25:19 UTC by PouleNoire ♦2 |
| 184387584 (Comments: 1) | Ma4G (Discussed changesets: 7) | src: survey with photos + aerial images commented 2026-06-21 12:21:33 UTC by Ma4G ♦11 |
| 184387407 (Comments: 1) | Ma4G (Discussed changesets: 7) | src: survey with photos commented 2026-06-21 12:21:19 UTC by Ma4G ♦11 |
| 182115590 (Comments: 1) | SurfacePics (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoi, du hast mit dem Löschen der Wege vier Wanderwege (DiVa-Walk, Bad Essener Rundweg, TERRA.track Hünnefelder Tannen, Rundweg 5) zerschnitten, sodass da jetzt eine große Lücke klafft. Wie verlaufen die Wanderwege denn jetzt vor... commented 2026-06-21 12:11:40 UTC by DeFra85 ♦296 |
| 184312393 (Comments: 1) | ceryslovell (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Ceryslovell, what is your source for these speed limit changes, as this road is still 30MPH, not 40MPH? Many thanks, Richard :) commented 2026-06-21 12:08:43 UTC by 0235 ♦44 |
| 184318620 (Comments: 1) | Atrotters (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dobrze, że Pan w porę poprawił "błąd" w swojej pracy, już myślałem nad wycofaniem (jeszcze chwilę wyświetlało, jakby droga była ukończona) commented 2026-06-21 12:04:47 UTC by Skywaltuh ♦23 |
| 170890836 (Comments: 3) | michalsbp (Discussed changesets: 3) | Chodzi o zamknięte przejście graniczne: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zamkniete-przejscia-graniczne-z-bialorusia-kategorie-drog-do-granicy/102551 commented 2026-06-21 11:51:28 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦911 |
| 183905926 (Comments: 1) | griba (Discussed changesets: 20) | Pakeitimas atšauktas (išskyrus prie Circle K degalinės), kintamos informacijos ženklai nekeičia įprasto greičio ribojimo žemėlapyje, kai sudės tikrus ženklus - tada ir bus galima keisti. Taip pat siūlyčiau pasikartoti greiči... commented 2026-06-21 11:45:30 UTC by ygcgjp5 ♦114 |
| 174280819 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM4 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Спасибо commented 2026-06-21 11:30:49 UTC by Ozon OSM4 ♦6 |
| 183419844 (Comments: 10) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 9) | I'm sorry you feel that way. Please avoid blindly repeating to others what you may have heard about your own approach. If you lecture people about rules, you should know why you do so. commented 2026-06-21 11:23:16 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
| 184337964 (Comments: 8) | Mjmcc521 (Discussed changesets: 2) | If all you say is true, then thank you. I apologize for my attitude. My dogs on on parameter collars so they cannot get in the public road. The delivery drivers come speeding through my driveway and have nearly hit my dogs. I see this on my cameras ... commented 2026-06-21 11:21:47 UTC by Mjmcc521 ♦2 |
| 183840673 (Comments: 2) | Wentura (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cześć, dzięki za informację – jakiś błąd edytorski się wkradł 😊 Tagi usunąłem i pododawałem segregated commented 2026-06-21 11:17:30 UTC by Wentura ♦1 |
| 175895758 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM9 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Здравствуйте, спасибо, поняла. commented 2026-06-21 11:16:19 UTC by Ozon OSM9 ♦6 |
| 184275702 (Comments: 1) | DirkHH69 (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.48373&lat=53.51844&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_sam... commented 2026-06-21 11:12:28 UTC by kartler175 ♦580 |
| 182720409 (Comments: 7) | AriAlvarez (Discussed changesets: 5) | or more specifically, highway=primary means something else than "the most important road in a given town" see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/some-random-stretches-of-highway-secondary-upgraded-to-primary/144757 commented 2026-06-21 11:02:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184368004 (Comments: 1) | Stantrecht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap, J'ai remarqué que vous aviez fait quelques erreurs dans les tags d'accès dans vos dernières contributions. Pour cela, je vous conseille de lire la page wiki à ce suj... commented 2026-06-21 10:49:20 UTC by ndf_maypole ♦12 |
| 178431710 (Comments: 2) | Deanna Earley (Discussed changesets: 20) | Yeah, was supposed to be height. I'll correct at some point commented 2026-06-21 10:49:02 UTC by Deanna Earley ♦48 |
| 153956754 (Comments: 1) | wegavision (Discussed changesets: 134) | Here, there is not a traffic sign node2685542799 what was the source? commented 2026-06-21 10:27:33 UTC by Ondřej Lopatka ♦30 |
| 184229053 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184383497 commented 2026-06-21 10:13:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184228822 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184383471 commented 2026-06-21 10:12:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184282354 (Comments: 2) | Adambro (Discussed changesets: 2) | That's a good question. Ultimately the path is just worn into the field so that will disappear fairly quickly though will still be on aerial photos for many years. I think at this point I'm of the view that the path has gone and it is right... commented 2026-06-21 09:31:48 UTC by Adambro ♦2 |
| 184344477 (Comments: 1) | SatarnDioxide (Discussed changesets: 1) | 请不要将landuse与line连接在一起 commented 2026-06-21 09:17:21 UTC by Masyas ♦40 |
| 184128084 (Comments: 1) | SerchoHJ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I think we do not map the road as a dual carriageway (at 40.396315,-1.189155) if there is no physical separation between the carriageways. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway for more information. commented 2026-06-21 09:16:23 UTC by ika-chan! ♦405 |
| 184378464 (Comments: 1) | Mark_S (Discussed changesets: 5) | Heya, thanks for improving these houses! When splitting terraces, please remember to change the building type — building=terrace means a whole row of terraced houses, so when splitting, each house needs to be changed to building=house house=ter... commented 2026-06-21 09:12:59 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,066 |
| 180504790 (Comments: 4) | Thom Simmons NTS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah, OK. Thank you very much for your answer und good luck! commented 2026-06-21 09:05:52 UTC by Scout Jens ♦311 |
| 184380987 (Comments: 1) | Endres Pelka (Discussed changesets: 56) | Sorry, I accidentally submitted the changeset without proper description. Description: Los Angeles: details and address of Filipinotown Drill Site. Source: https://cityclerk.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0447-S3_misc_10_05-27-2025.pdf commented 2026-06-21 09:01:11 UTC by Endres Pelka ♦420 |
| 184370058 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Revert (Discussed changesets: 13) | You are likely looking at an old map with data from before your own earlier changesets, as I didn't touch either of those changes--you may need to hard-reload your browser (press reload while holding the Shift key on desktop, or long-press it on... commented 2026-06-21 09:00:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184380052 (Comments: 1) | joeposaurus (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 commented 2026-06-21 08:52:34 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184380602 (Comments: 1) | lakshya_717 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please look into new GPS positions of each bus stop that previously exxisted on the corridor commented 2026-06-21 08:51:36 UTC by lakshya_717 ♦1 |
| 184376732 (Comments: 4) | joeposaurus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Heb twee changesets ingediend met een request for review: 184380121 (verwijderen deze change) en 184380052 (tag op correcte adres). Hoop dat ik het daarme opgelost heb. commented 2026-06-21 08:36:41 UTC by joeposaurus ♦1 |
| 184349275 (Comments: 6) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Chociaż w przypadku jak jest szlaban mozna go oznaczyć jako barrier=lift_gate gdy jest podnoszony do góry lub barrier=swing_gate gdy jest obracany. Dodając access=private. I to dać na drodze w miejscu szlabanu. Można też dodać material=... commented 2026-06-21 08:12:48 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 180085593 (Comments: 1) | Touristvdk (Discussed changesets: 1) | МЕСТНЫЙ ЯЗЫК!Вы что, слепой? В Китае нет правила, обязывающего всех говорить по-русски!（以上为google translate） commented 2026-06-21 08:11:11 UTC by Taksine ♦170 |
| 184127260 (Comments: 2) | Bovi887 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks! Fixed, including platform and tracks: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184379492#map=11/48.6481/2.2108 commented 2026-06-21 08:10:00 UTC by Bovi887 ♦14 |
| 184252194 (Comments: 1) | Zoe2789 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset (reverted in #184252194) as it removed a portion of George St's highway tags and deleted some other nodes unrelated to the changes you've descr... commented 2026-06-21 08:04:01 UTC by jxeeno ♦10 |
| 181173290 (Comments: 1) | lee_bei (Discussed changesets: 4) | hi, please don't use alpine_hut in auckland. it never snows in auckland so these are definitely not tourism=alpine_hut 😆 maybe "hostel" or "motel" would be more appropriate? commented 2026-06-21 07:57:06 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦492 |
 | 156958843 (Comments: 4) | W1mpie13 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oke, maar waarom name:x =V in verschillende talen? Die regels kunnen beter weg. De naam is toch niet V? Mvg, eggie commented 2026-06-21 07:39:21 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184240807 (Comments: 2) | W1mpie13 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Er staan 4 gebouwen op het terrein van Fort Orthen: 1. Nico Schuurmanshuis (Stichting gemeenschapshuis Orthen), adres Ketsheuvel 50. 2. Handboog vereniging Prins Bernhard, adres Ketsheuvel 52. 3. Schijvenloods ( gehuurd door Nico Schuurmans... commented 2026-06-21 07:30:11 UTC by W1mpie13 ♦4 |
| 184240684 (Comments: 3) | W1mpie13 (Discussed changesets: 5) | 👍 commented 2026-06-21 07:18:01 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 145421078 (Comments: 1) | Bosthinkingrn (Discussed changesets: 4) | Servus, schaust du dir bitte https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5351635 an, einem von dir eingezeichneten Pfad, danke! commented 2026-06-21 07:12:41 UTC by PPete2 ♦166 |
 | 184377845 (Comments: 1) | KimChinhTri (Discussed changesets: 5) | additional source: https://5.pik.vn/6f2d2c7d7c087195cc11c69747eaff7385fc4635a47908b938d30b5d92c5b1df.webp updated the border of Binh Tri Dong and Binh Hung Hoa wards: https://binhhunghoa.gov.vn/tin-tuc/to-chuc-lay-y-kien-cu-tri-ve-de-an-sap-xe... commented 2026-06-21 07:10:45 UTC by KimChinhTri ♦2 |
| 184367426 (Comments: 2) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | bardzo dużo po okolicznych lasach jeżdżę rowerem i bardzo wielu ścieżek na mapach nie ma :) commented 2026-06-21 07:02:04 UTC by SENGAM ♦6 |
| 184377573 (Comments: 1) | madmaximux (Discussed changesets: 1) | *Updated roundabout and a couple traffic islands. Based on local knowledge and aerial imagery. commented 2026-06-21 06:59:05 UTC by madmaximux ♦1 |
| 183313058 (Comments: 4) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 59) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2026-06-21 06:55:15 UTC by StC ♦474 |
| 184327136 (Comments: 1) | Yukiro (Discussed changesets: 34) | Kościół do poprawki commented 2026-06-21 06:51:35 UTC by Yukiro ♦46 |
| 184071053 (Comments: 1) | chamdam (Discussed changesets: 30) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2026-06-21 06:48:23 UTC by StC ♦474 |
| 184292415 (Comments: 1) | Amelia Ind (Discussed changesets: 6) | Several fictional highways are removed commented 2026-06-21 06:46:45 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 184373282 (Comments: 3) | DavyS32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Davy.. Ik heb nog even de heide in een multipolygoon gezet als inner anders zie je bos en heide door elkaar. Ik zal je ons onze welkomstmail sturen per PB. CTRL-F5 voor versneld effect.. of geduld kan ook. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-21 06:43:56 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 174145681 (Comments: 2) | vincent_95 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Bonjour Je ne suis pas l'auteur du tracé d'origine, je n'ai que marginalement retouché la géométrie. C'est à lui qu'il faudrait poser la question, cf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184... commented 2026-06-21 06:29:24 UTC by vincent_95 ♦39 |
| 184137807 (Comments: 3) | nurdafur (Discussed changesets: 104) | I deleted it allready commented 2026-06-21 06:28:08 UTC by nurdafur ♦251 |
| 184353948 (Comments: 1) | Trần Xuân (Discussed changesets: 4) | The expressway has now been expanded to 6 lanes, so the current version is no longer suitable. Please revert to the previous version. commented 2026-06-21 06:07:02 UTC by ZioDragon ♦29 |
| 183932632 (Comments: 1) | Austrailia (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184376385 commented 2026-06-21 05:54:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183336488 (Comments: 5) | Destabilizacja (Discussed changesets: 30) | Myślę że kolumna man_made=column mogło by pasować. I tak widzę po dokumentacji że nie będzie się to zobrazowywać na mapie. Tak do końca to to kolumna też nie jest... Ja bym to zostawił. Tego typu ogrodzeń przy kościołach jest pełno i... commented 2026-06-21 05:52:08 UTC by Destabilizacja ♦11 |
| 182132714 (Comments: 2) | Wally_PL (Discussed changesets: 11) | Cześć. Z początkiem maja pojawiły się kartki na witrynie z informacją o likwidacji sklepu, 2 maja już był zamknięty. Nie za bardzo wiem, jak ma się sprawa obecnie, a póki co nie szykuje mi się wyjazd w te strony. commented 2026-06-21 05:48:43 UTC by Wally_PL ♦13 |
| 184333711 (Comments: 3) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 36) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184376211 commented 2026-06-21 05:42:08 UTC by TheSwavu ♦653 |
| 184291739 (Comments: 1) | 154pinkchairs (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-06-21 04:52:41 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184350855 (Comments: 1) | rickykrn1995 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ini gang atau trotoar? coba pengaturannya pakai bahasa Indonesia, itu akan lebih memudahkan dalam pemberian tag commented 2026-06-21 04:27:51 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 182501640 (Comments: 2) | Rio Achmad (Discussed changesets: 5) | perubahan ini telah dipulihkan commented 2026-06-21 04:10:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 183130252 (Comments: 2) | Rio Achmad (Discussed changesets: 5) | perubahan ini telah dipulihkan commented 2026-06-21 04:08:56 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184234935 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251274 commented 2026-06-21 04:05:45 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184235067 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 04:04:35 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184235116 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251373 commented 2026-06-21 04:02:32 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184185298 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184374879 commented 2026-06-21 03:59:31 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184184652 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184374849 commented 2026-06-21 03:57:22 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184202533 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374856 commented 2026-06-21 03:56:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184187553 (Comments: 2) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184374812 commented 2026-06-21 03:53:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184187434 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert y 184374810 commented 2026-06-21 03:52:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184187755 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184374775 commented 2026-06-21 03:49:39 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184187859 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184374743 commented 2026-06-21 03:46:53 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184186863 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374728 commented 2026-06-21 03:45:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184186688 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374728 commented 2026-06-21 03:45:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184373508 (Comments: 2) | Pentium20 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @smichae No problem! commented 2026-06-21 03:45:01 UTC by Pentium20 ♦1 |
| 184186550 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374706 commented 2026-06-21 03:43:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184186231 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374706 commented 2026-06-21 03:43:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184186325 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374706 commented 2026-06-21 03:43:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184186386 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374706 commented 2026-06-21 03:43:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184186194 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374706 commented 2026-06-21 03:43:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184186120 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374682 commented 2026-06-21 03:41:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184186168 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374682 commented 2026-06-21 03:41:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185971 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374682 commented 2026-06-21 03:41:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184186021 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374682 commented 2026-06-21 03:41:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185942 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374682 commented 2026-06-21 03:41:44 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185834 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374669 commented 2026-06-21 03:40:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185741 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374657 commented 2026-06-21 03:39:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185770 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374657 commented 2026-06-21 03:39:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185722 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374534 commented 2026-06-21 03:28:13 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185672 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374511 commented 2026-06-21 03:26:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185622 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184374493 commented 2026-06-21 03:25:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185515 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184374438 commented 2026-06-21 03:23:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185477 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184374438 commented 2026-06-21 03:21:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185427 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by Changeset 184374420: DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features commented 2026-06-21 03:19:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185375 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184374407 commented 2026-06-21 03:18:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185339 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184374382 commented 2026-06-21 03:16:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185252 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184374287 commented 2026-06-21 03:09:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185185 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184374269 commented 2026-06-21 03:08:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184185087 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184374216 commented 2026-06-21 03:04:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181400768 (Comments: 1) | fkhsans (Discussed changesets: 1) | sepertinya dobel itu yang deket Cisadane. Ini garis bukan jalan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499827874 commented 2026-06-21 03:01:15 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184187300 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184374020 commented 2026-06-21 02:49:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184267419 (Comments: 1) | rdzik (Discussed changesets: 30) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267936476 https://www.ope... commented 2026-06-21 02:44:01 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184266940 (Comments: 1) | Melmack (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-06-21 02:43:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184269132 (Comments: 1) | piqlis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-06-21 02:43:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 182325082 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 144) | haha cheers, i discovered man_made=geoglyph recently and they’re quite fun to map 😆 commented 2026-06-21 02:33:16 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦492 |
| 183998702 (Comments: 3) | SyrupMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi SyrupMap, Following up on my message from 12 June 2026 — I haven't heard back from you regarding the revert of changeset #183998702. I'm writing to let you know that if I don't hear from you by Saturday June 27th... commented 2026-06-21 02:30:33 UTC by Toby H Ferguson ♦5 |
| 184185049 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184373657 commented 2026-06-21 02:23:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184230814 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184373603 commented 2026-06-21 02:20:46 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184230708 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184373603 commented 2026-06-21 02:20:42 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184230463 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184373603 commented 2026-06-21 02:20:37 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184158012 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184173507 commented 2026-06-21 02:13:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184231089 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184373482 commented 2026-06-21 02:12:49 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184333746 (Comments: 1) | Cretaceous Muffins (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset 183849933 already temporarily renamed the stadium in line with the FIFA host committee’s branding. The stadium building is practically synonymous with the stadium grounds, so I see no reason to give them different names. Your changese... commented 2026-06-21 01:55:54 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦632 |
| 183948935 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert- unverified speed limit changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184373185 commented 2026-06-21 01:51:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182663981 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert- unverified speed limit changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184373185 commented 2026-06-21 01:51:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 179302359 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert- unverified speed limit changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184373185 commented 2026-06-21 01:51:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 180364566 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert- unverified speed limit changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184373185 commented 2026-06-21 01:51:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 179309925 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert- unverified speed limit changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184373185 commented 2026-06-21 01:51:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 179301853 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 8) | DWG revert- unverified speed limit changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184373185 commented 2026-06-21 01:51:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| X | 184371028 (Comments: 2) | aleph_null (Discussed changesets: 10) | There must have been an old leftover bit in NZ, sorry about that. I had actually reset Rapid, but it evidently didn't work properly between browser reloads. The edits should all be correct, though (and they are only in the two corners, not in be... commented 2026-06-21 01:41:32 UTC by aleph_null ♦21 |
| 184231232 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184372907 commented 2026-06-21 01:30:32 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184231329 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184372878 commented 2026-06-21 01:28:22 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184231564 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Partially reverted in changeset #184372842 commented 2026-06-21 01:25:22 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184231786 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184372787 commented 2026-06-21 01:18:25 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232138 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184372715 commented 2026-06-21 01:11:40 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232253 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184372687 commented 2026-06-21 01:09:04 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184369227 (Comments: 1) | serfuja (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Los dos negocios que habías añadido ya existían en el mapa. He procedido a añadir la información de teléfonos y horarios de apertura a los ya existentes y borré los que habías a&nti... commented 2026-06-21 01:07:51 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦367 |
| 184232297 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184372645 commented 2026-06-21 01:04:39 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232369 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184372603 commented 2026-06-21 01:01:53 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232434 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184372543 commented 2026-06-21 00:58:08 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232517 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:53:06 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232606 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:49:31 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232684 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:47:02 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232715 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:46:08 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232743 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:44:58 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184113241 (Comments: 1) | Lecnik (Discussed changesets: 5) | Во-первых, кладбище здесь уже было нарисовано полигоном, вы добавили точку, продублировав объект. Во-вторых, "Кладбище" - это не собс... commented 2026-06-21 00:40:47 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦257 |
| 184232785 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:40:44 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184232919 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:38:58 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184113180 (Comments: 1) | Lecnik (Discussed changesets: 5) | "Родник" - это не название родника. Если у родника нет названия, не надо ничего заносить в тег name. commented 2026-06-21 00:38:14 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦257 |
| 184233003 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:38:00 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184370522 (Comments: 2) | topolusitania (Discussed changesets: 86) | article 14 and others of Decreto-Lei 230/91 commented 2026-06-21 00:36:03 UTC by PL 2188677 ♦4 |
| 184233134 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:36:03 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184113119 (Comments: 1) | Lecnik (Discussed changesets: 5) | Здравствуйте. По-первых, кладбище здесь уже было нарисовано полигоном, вы добавили точку, продублировав объект. Во-вторых, "Кладби... commented 2026-06-21 00:35:25 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦257 |
| 184233175 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:34:10 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233285 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:32:43 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184113008 (Comments: 1) | Lecnik (Discussed changesets: 5) | По ФИАС и публичной кадастровой карте здесь нет деревни "Студеновка". Это деревня Александровка. Откатываю. commented 2026-06-21 00:32:21 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦257 |
| 184113000 (Comments: 1) | Lecnik (Discussed changesets: 5) | Здравствуйте. По ФИАС и публичной кадастровой карте здесь нет деревни "Велия". Откатываю. commented 2026-06-21 00:31:34 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦257 |
| 184233375 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:31:22 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233473 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:29:03 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233556 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Partially reverted in changeset #184372122 commented 2026-06-21 00:27:22 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233612 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:20:57 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233694 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:19:21 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233740 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:16:21 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233867 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:14:15 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233928 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:12:28 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184233999 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:10:47 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184234086 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:09:55 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184234145 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:07:48 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184234196 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-21 00:06:14 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 180721094 (Comments: 3) | Avenue Dental Care - Spokane Valley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184371853 https://osm.org/changeset/184371853 commented 2026-06-21 00:06:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 181879251 (Comments: 1) | bambrick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184371829 https://osm.org/changeset/184371829 commented 2026-06-21 00:04:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 179748700 (Comments: 3) | Michaal Moris (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cleaned up remaining SEO/incorrect tags for POI in changeset 184371761 https://osm.org/changeset/184371761 commented 2026-06-21 00:00:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 179732415 (Comments: 3) | Michaal Moris (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cleaned up remaining SEO/incorrect tags for POI in changeset 184371761 https://osm.org/changeset/184371761 commented 2026-06-20 23:59:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178617626 (Comments: 1) | @hamidostovari136767 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Clean up and consolidate duplicate nodes/tags for SEO POIs in in changeset 184371667 https://osm.org/changeset/184371667 commented 2026-06-20 23:53:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178712873 (Comments: 1) | @hamidostovari136767 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Clean up and consolidate duplicate nodes/tags for SEO POIs in in changeset 184371667 https://osm.org/changeset/184371667 commented 2026-06-20 23:53:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180746784 (Comments: 1) | Saigon Technology Vietnam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Clean up and move tags for SEO POI from apartment building to separate node in changeset 184371570 https://osm.org/changeset/184371570 commented 2026-06-20 23:46:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184234248 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184371473 commented 2026-06-20 23:42:15 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 181750817 (Comments: 1) | Kopsas (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cleaned up names and tagging for "Klaipėda Stevedoring Company" buildings in changeset 184371414 https://osm.org/changeset/184371414 commented 2026-06-20 23:38:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 181751164 (Comments: 1) | Kopsas (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cleaned up names and tagging for "Klaipėda Stevedoring Company" buildings in changeset 184371414 https://osm.org/changeset/184371414 commented 2026-06-20 23:38:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184234280 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-20 23:36:08 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184234392 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-20 23:34:23 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184234495 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-20 23:32:44 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184234628 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692 commented 2026-06-20 23:30:33 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 183984468 (Comments: 2) | Printemps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fascinating! I suppose that makes sense if I think about it as a "booker". Thanks for finding the "bookbinding shop" designation. commented 2026-06-20 23:25:54 UTC by Printemps ♦1 |
| 177949893 (Comments: 1) | hmesgar (Discussed changesets: 2) | Split POI from building, cleaned up SEO spam, fixed tags, and added missing top-level tagging for POI "OMEGA Company" in changeset 184371115 https://osm.org/changeset/184371115 commented 2026-06-20 23:19:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 177959664 (Comments: 1) | hmesgar (Discussed changesets: 2) | Split POI from building, cleaned up SEO spam, fixed tags, and added missing top-level tagging for POI "OMEGA Company" in changeset 184371115 https://osm.org/changeset/184371115 commented 2026-06-20 23:18:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184248127 (Comments: 3) | VictorIE (Discussed changesets: 153) | Hi, So it seems that Taginfo, Postpass, and Overpass are all 'happy' with the first character being a colon. They seem to work OK with both ":levels" and ":levels=1". Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap... commented 2026-06-20 23:10:30 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,168 |
| 184324269 (Comments: 3) | Wereldkaart123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Heel erg bedankt, ik heb t aangepast commented 2026-06-20 23:08:33 UTC by Wereldkaart123 ♦12 |
| 184157868 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184175251 commented 2026-06-20 22:56:35 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| X | 184357804 (Comments: 1) | vilasis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam tags/relations in changeset 184370579 https://osm.org/changeset/184370579 commented 2026-06-20 22:48:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184357382 (Comments: 1) | vilasis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184370579 https://osm.org/changeset/184370579 commented 2026-06-20 22:47:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184295691 (Comments: 1) | PL 2188677 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted If roads are private, that info will be indicated commented 2026-06-20 22:45:45 UTC by topolusitania ♦246 |
| 184202698 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184370518 commented 2026-06-20 22:44:46 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184202747 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184370518 commented 2026-06-20 22:44:38 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184354188 (Comments: 1) | Mjmcc521 (Discussed changesets: 2) | NB, incorrectly deleted highway=* restored and tagged correctly as a private driveway in changeset 184370058 https://osm.org/changeset/184370058 commented 2026-06-20 22:38:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦252 |
| 184363828 (Comments: 3) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 35) | thank you for the quick response :D this helps with understanding access tagging. Happy mapping! commented 2026-06-20 22:23:08 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦4 |
| 175614265 (Comments: 1) | Ivor Švihran (Discussed changesets: 29) | No Vasa lokalna znalost je teda obdivuhodna. Bolo by vhodne linkovat na konkretne VZN obci alebo zdroje, ak chcete pridavat taketo neoficialne nazvy ulic ci objektov. Nech aspon je jasne, ci to uz nie je zo storocnych map ako doteraz. commented 2026-06-20 22:10:23 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,941 |
| 183070859 (Comments: 3) | Nüsschen (Discussed changesets: 35) | Alles klar Wollte nur mal fragen weil ich ne maproulette Änderung an dem Weg gesehen hatte und da aufm Luftbild nix sehen konnte Beste Grüße commented 2026-06-20 22:03:07 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,116 |
| 184362898 (Comments: 6) | Rob__1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Die zuidelijke 'fietsrotonde' staat niet als roundabout getagd. Dat doen we ook liever niet ivm de fietsrouterelaties. commented 2026-06-20 21:44:42 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
 | 183238392 (Comments: 1) | 10inchesinurmum (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, when you tag roads as under construction, then please remember to retain the original highway tag. The correct tagging would be highway=construction + construction=service in this case. Thank you for collaboration with the community... commented 2026-06-20 21:40:12 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦189 |
| 184295771 (Comments: 1) | Zarrink (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, Please do not connect waterways to railway bridges - these are features that do not intersect and are on different layers. I corrected the three placed on Latvia border. Thanks commented 2026-06-20 21:40:00 UTC by HellMap ♦927 |
| 183988563 (Comments: 2) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 198) | You're welcome commented 2026-06-20 21:38:11 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦429 |
| 184116064 (Comments: 2) | Nick Xia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, I'll review all the changes I have made commented 2026-06-20 21:37:25 UTC by Nick Xia ♦1 |
| 184368702 (Comments: 1) | Matija Nalis (Discussed changesets: 15) | ops, wrong comment, fixing notes in Croatia generally commented 2026-06-20 21:21:07 UTC by Matija Nalis ♦139 |
| 184368433 (Comments: 1) | Matija Nalis (Discussed changesets: 15) | ops, wrong comment, fixing notes in Croatia generally commented 2026-06-20 21:21:02 UTC by Matija Nalis ♦139 |
| 184368283 (Comments: 1) | Matija Nalis (Discussed changesets: 15) | ops, wrong comment, fixing notes in Croatia generally commented 2026-06-20 21:20:47 UTC by Matija Nalis ♦139 |
| 184362428 (Comments: 4) | Rob__1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Valhalla doet het bv wel zoals jij wil. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=52.913233%2C4.79335%3B52.913043%2C4.793504#map=18/52.912837/4.792968 Osrm en graphhopper nemen de trap. Keuze van de o... commented 2026-06-20 21:18:11 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184366901 (Comments: 1) | jpmaceda (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por la contribución. Revisé el conjunto de cambios y me parece que está bien. Cualquier consulta podés contactarnos en la comunidad OSM Argentina: https://t.me/osm_ar --- ... commented 2026-06-20 21:15:34 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184328691 (Comments: 3) | silly_goose (Discussed changesets: 10) | Viel Erfolg commented 2026-06-20 21:11:22 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 184228694 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184368610 commented 2026-06-20 21:11:18 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184228630 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184368610 commented 2026-06-20 21:11:11 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184228715 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184368517 commented 2026-06-20 21:07:33 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184264336 (Comments: 1) | Robert66 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour Robert66, je suis impressionné par vous ajouts, faite vous cela uniquement avec des images aériennes ? commented 2026-06-20 21:05:16 UTC by __________--_--__________ ♦2 |
| 184228759 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184368397 commented 2026-06-20 21:03:41 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184229106 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184368274 commented 2026-06-20 20:58:33 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184229154 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184368230 commented 2026-06-20 20:56:09 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184229193 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184368180 commented 2026-06-20 20:53:54 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184324835 (Comments: 1) | DenchikBorovoy2011 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Здравствуйте. Скажите, пожалуйста, этот участок https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529669472 отделён от основной дороги физическим разделителем? Если не... commented 2026-06-20 20:51:37 UTC by alexey_zakharenkov ♦257 |
| 121444657 (Comments: 1) | tomzyl (Discussed changesets: 52) | Częstotliwość 15000 Hz? commented 2026-06-20 20:41:45 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦911 |
| 184314758 (Comments: 1) | Ivanov32ß039ß3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Върнах възела, понеже върху него има и други полезни данни. Ще прехвърля името от сградата върху възела. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184367754 commented 2026-06-20 20:35:55 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦931 |
| 174684222 (Comments: 1) | A09 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, when mapping a sidewalk explicitly, then the tags on the main carriageway need to reflect this: Usually by tagging sidewalk=separate, but this can also be refined with e. g. sidewalk:right=separate, sidewalk:left=no, etc. commented 2026-06-20 20:30:47 UTC by martianfreeloader ♦189 |
| 184358184 (Comments: 2) | Matthijs Kooijman (Discussed changesets: 11) | This is what Streetcomplete did when I said "It's vacant". In reality, there is no longer a gift shop, and I think the building is for sale likely for housing instead of a ship, so I'll remove the tag manually. commented 2026-06-20 20:26:17 UTC by Matthijs Kooijman ♦11 |
| 184367179 (Comments: 1) | FatJackal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Two Flock devices mounted in two separate poles side-by-side. commented 2026-06-20 20:21:01 UTC by FatJackal ♦1 |
| 184229591 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184367064 commented 2026-06-20 20:12:25 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184229735 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184366963 commented 2026-06-20 20:08:59 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184012364 (Comments: 4) | Kaduna (Discussed changesets: 30) | Sugiero corregir este tramo. Lleva más de 10 años abandonado, por lo que las etiquetas de obra activa (highway=construction) ya no corresponden. Como actualmente se usa de forma peatonal, propongo actualizarlo así: abando... commented 2026-06-20 20:07:24 UTC by Eddie845 ♦15 |
| 184319223 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM5 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! No, it was only according to the Esri Imagery. Why? commented 2026-06-20 19:55:00 UTC by Ozon OSM5 ♦2 |
| 184229775 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184366493 commented 2026-06-20 19:54:24 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184356998 (Comments: 1) | Mcgyver1103 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. Medemappers zullen dat op prijs stellen. MVG eggie commented 2026-06-20 19:42:40 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184354487 (Comments: 1) | Staalblauw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Top! commented 2026-06-20 19:39:47 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 176144290 (Comments: 2) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 22) | Rendben. Köszi a javítást! commented 2026-06-20 19:34:08 UTC by qstep ♦123 |
| 184282469 (Comments: 2) | Analogknipser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Tipp. Hab auch jede Ladestation hinzugefügt welche dann zusammengefasst wurden zu einer. Leider kann ich das Gelände noch nicht genau Abstecken da es noch kein aktuelles Satellitenbild gibt um auch den genauen Bereich ... commented 2026-06-20 19:04:39 UTC by Analogknipser ♦1 |
| 184348183 (Comments: 2) | Straßenvervollständiger (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Rene, Danke für den Hinweis. Werde aufpassen wenn ich nochmal Öffnungszeiten ändere. Habe nachgeforscht und anscheinend hat CoMaps oder OrganicMaps das Problem seit längerem, schade. Grüße St... commented 2026-06-20 19:04:02 UTC by Straßenvervollständiger ♦1 |
| 184363375 (Comments: 1) | RickyDeng (Discussed changesets: 1) | The source which you are using is lacking of information. Some facilities you added are already demolished. The coordinates you provided are completing unusable (e.g. node/13954345703 is having a 200km+ offset). leisure=playground is not the right ta... commented 2026-06-20 18:56:38 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦74 |
| 184348642 (Comments: 4) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Faktycznie, możwe że wyrysowałem drogę aż do działki prywatnej. Czasem ludzie nawet tabliczki "teten prywatnył nie postawią :) commented 2026-06-20 18:56:02 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 167186912 (Comments: 1) | Fred_OSM (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, ce morceau de rue a été fermé par la mairie, et est matérialisé par des marquages au sol commented 2026-06-20 18:46:09 UTC by Pastèque24 ♦18 |
| 184344234 (Comments: 3) | Finn Freitag (Discussed changesets: 7) | Danke für die schnelle Reaktion :) Kleiner Tip: Die Halluzinationsmaschinen von Google und Co. spucken gerne viel Dreck aus. Erste Anlaufstelle für Suchen sollte wiki.osm.org sein. Gibt es dann Unklarheiten empfehle ich Menschen zu f... commented 2026-06-20 18:44:22 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,116 |
| 184363850 (Comments: 1) | Ma4G (Discussed changesets: 7) | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5352685 commented 2026-06-20 18:41:52 UTC by Ma4G ♦11 |
| 184362321 (Comments: 1) | omaarr_lmm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-06-20 18:35:42 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184349789 (Comments: 1) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Zawrotka dalej jest, tylko trawa na niej rośnie ale jest wyraźnie niższa niż trawa dookoła. Chociaż jak byłem tu ostatni raz to była wyjeżdzona commented 2026-06-20 18:31:57 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 181031690 (Comments: 1) | adas (Discussed changesets: 85) | A czemu nadal access=destination? commented 2026-06-20 18:30:17 UTC by VA00 ♦634 |
| 184349936 (Comments: 1) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Właśnie byłem sprawdzić i droga dalej jest commented 2026-06-20 18:29:49 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 184347513 (Comments: 2) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 161) | Great, thanks for confirming :) commented 2026-06-20 18:22:39 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,066 |
| 184236826 (Comments: 3) | Michal Polášek (Discussed changesets: 7) | veru su, jazdim tadial dost casto..ale teraz su trochu ujazdene, lebo ako to tam cele prerabali tak tie nakladne auta ich trochu ujazdili...rozhodne tam nie je fine_gravel co su take male kamienky ako trebars medzi batakom a vyklopnikom v sudkach commented 2026-06-20 18:18:53 UTC by Patr1k_P ♦479 |
| 183947234 (Comments: 4) | Ferviarg (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ahhh bueno, muchas gracias, osea si pensé que ahí estaba la parada porque era el final de la línea, aunque también me pasó que note eso con algunos Interurbanos de mi zona, por ejemplo como los buses lep, no atravie... commented 2026-06-20 18:14:51 UTC by Ferviarg ♦1 |
| 184351504 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 27) | Please reply https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177402037 commented 2026-06-20 18:11:50 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,929 |
| 177402037 (Comments: 3) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 27) | What's the difference with Kung Um Rd? commented 2026-06-20 18:11:21 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,929 |
| 139061969 (Comments: 1) | Chtibacca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, do you have any evidence that this track is private for all?? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192528490 commented 2026-06-20 18:10:46 UTC by mk2k22 ♦43 |
| 184348792 (Comments: 1) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ta ścieżka prowadziła do schodków, które tam są i służą kontroli wylotu wody z oczyszczalni. Tu nia ma kanału, woda idzie rurą pod ziemią commented 2026-06-20 18:04:24 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 184351387 (Comments: 3) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Droga jest dostępna dla kilentów kwatery będącej własnością nadleśnictwa, więc możnaby dać access=customers jak już commented 2026-06-20 18:00:41 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 184349704 (Comments: 1) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | To droga dojazdowa do domu 105 i dworu. Powinna być service=driveway commented 2026-06-20 17:56:14 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 184271488 (Comments: 3) | Mark_S (Discussed changesets: 5) | Accidental change. Agree with your correction commented 2026-06-20 17:54:19 UTC by Mark_S ♦4 |
| 184360038 (Comments: 1) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Access=no był na moście, bo z uwagi na stan techniczny (konstrukcja moatu naruszona i most stoi pod kątem) oraz znak zakazu wjazdu most jest niebezpieczny do przejazdu. Widziałem go w terenie commented 2026-06-20 17:51:44 UTC by Paweł_M ♦46 |
| 184161390 (Comments: 2) | P!nkTrans1uc3n+ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the welcome, I'm happy to be here! I did look at the wiki before I made my edits and saw this about the name tag: "the most prominent signposted name or the most common name in the local language." Both of those are true for... commented 2026-06-20 17:37:41 UTC by P!nkTrans1uc3n+ ♦1 |
 | 183037833 (Comments: 4) | Phil973 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, j'en déduis que le numéro 30 indiqué sur la lettre pro est probablement erroné. Comme la commune n'a certifié aucune adresse et que ce bâtiment n'en porte aucun, cf. https://adresse.data.... commented 2026-06-20 17:28:04 UTC by Yunan973 ♦124 |
| 152464257 (Comments: 2) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 278) | Looks like this has been tagged along this stretch of road for 10 years!! - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380094014/history/1 commented 2026-06-20 17:26:17 UTC by MacLondon ♦241 |
| 184322369 (Comments: 1) | Pan_Nug (Discussed changesets: 31) | We're not driving on the left side of the road. Don't do automated changes based on a ticket system without local knowledge. Thank you. reverted with CS184360919 commented 2026-06-20 17:13:13 UTC by d_berger ♦213 |
| 184350754 (Comments: 1) | SENGAM (Discussed changesets: 14) | Przejazd był już oznaczony jako zlikwidowany, a skasowanie tej linii może spowodować, że ktoś go ponownie doda z ortofotomapy lub innego nieaktualnego źródła commented 2026-06-20 17:10:44 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦911 |
| 184357743 (Comments: 2) | richlv (Discussed changesets: 41) | Haha, es tieši nodomāju, ka ārpusei pret iekšpusi tik liels kontrasts :) Bet tur vēl jāpārbauda, vai visiem ne-Rimi veikaliem tiešām vienāds darba laiks, kā uz durvīm rakstīts (piem., varbūt picērijai ir cits).... commented 2026-06-20 17:01:02 UTC by richlv ♦430 |
| 184359227 (Comments: 1) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 62) | revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184349228 commented 2026-06-20 16:21:15 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦958 |
| 184334899 (Comments: 1) | Martlarkis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Laba diena. Ten, kur nėra kelio ženklo „P“, tai nėra amenity=parking. Jei visas vietas, kuriose statomos mašinos sužymėti kaip amenity=parking, tai visas Vilnius bus vienas didelis „parkingas“ ir tada šita i... commented 2026-06-20 16:20:23 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,088 |
| 182651286 (Comments: 1) | Paulau59 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Je vois que vous avez ajouté building=restaurant sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69812763/history/4. building=* ne traduit pas l’occupation actuelle du bâtiment mais ce pourquoi il ... commented 2026-06-20 16:20:16 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦132 |
| 183827475 (Comments: 1) | Paulau59 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Je viens de faire une correction sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29012432/history/15. Vous aviez ajouté cycleway:left=track. Il y avait une double erreur : * track est utilis&eacut... commented 2026-06-20 16:17:51 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦132 |
| 184358596 (Comments: 1) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 62) | revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184351387 commented 2026-06-20 16:01:08 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦958 |
| 181487133 (Comments: 3) | ryu-to (Discussed changesets: 5) | こんばんは、他の人に英語で指摘されてますが、これは誤検出ではなく途中の道路に対して歩道がうまく接続されていないようです https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1500654613 など commented 2026-06-20 15:59:20 UTC by suzunote ♦13 |
| 178632110 (Comments: 4) | drgeppo (Discussed changesets: 1) | In realtà, leggendo la https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=permit sembra che "permit" si usi in situazioni dove basta pagare un biglietto. In questo caso credo che nessuno ottenga permessi facilmente, se non per lavori spe... commented 2026-06-20 15:56:44 UTC by civ41 ♦18 |
| 183599172 (Comments: 4) | d_berger (Discussed changesets: 87) | Ist definitiv nicht meine Lieblingsbeschäftigung, aber wir arbeiten an einem Projekt mit sehr vielen Sofamappern – und einige tragen einfach stur ein, was sie im Luftbild sehen. So wurden wiederholt temporäre Baustellenkreisel eingeze... commented 2026-06-20 15:52:25 UTC by d_berger ♦213 |
| 184269104 (Comments: 1) | ミイポン (Discussed changesets: 9) | 編集ありがとうございます！ cmではなくもう少し何をしたのか他の人が分かるコメントを書くことを心掛けていただけると助かります 参考：変更セットの良いコメント https://wi... commented 2026-06-20 15:48:06 UTC by suzunote ♦13 |
| 150668483 (Comments: 6) | zstadler (Discussed changesets: 131) | היה שם כחול, תחת מספר שביל אחר משאר השבילים הכחולים שביחס. הוא הוחלף בשחור לפני יותר משנתיים - לפני שאני הייתי שם. commented 2026-06-20 15:45:19 UTC by zstadler ♦1,136 |
| X | 184282931 (Comments: 1) | Janö987 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM :) thanks for helping with keeping the database up to date. As you are new I'd like to say hello and leave a set of helping links which might make your work here even better. There are some good prac... commented 2026-06-20 15:44:59 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,116 |
| 155190809 (Comments: 2) | _lukáš (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, jde o trasu značenou na mapách podél cesty pod číslem 02 (Velký okruh: To nejlepší z Jánošíkových děr) commented 2026-06-20 15:39:22 UTC by _lukáš ♦1 |
| 184325020 (Comments: 1) | Redeim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you accidentially added the node to the islands relations. I fixed that. Also, the opening hours tags wants 24hour times, no AM or PM. also fixed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2026-06-20 15:31:43 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 184348128 (Comments: 1) | tobim91 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi :) guck mal bei amenity=charging_station die einzelnen Ladepunkte hättest du als man_made=charge_point gerne drin lassen können und dann halt eine Fläche drum ziehen (inkl. Stellplätze), die dann die Gesamtstation... commented 2026-06-20 15:27:31 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,116 |
| 184306761 (Comments: 1) | aadvancedservices0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. SEO edit - doesn&#... commented 2026-06-20 15:26:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 184349394 (Comments: 1) | tobim91 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Moin tobim91 :) kleiner HInweis: location=roof und layer=1 (vermutlich) dürften hier noch angebrachte tags sein. happy mapping --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2026-06-20 15:23:48 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,116 |
| 184351695 (Comments: 2) | brentmaas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dankjewel, Eggie :) commented 2026-06-20 15:22:10 UTC by brentmaas ♦1 |
| 174580736 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | *Upgraded 🤦♂️ commented 2026-06-20 15:15:45 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
| 184323986 (Comments: 1) | Wariner (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi du hast hier 7 Relationen gelöscht und als die Änderung nur mit "Kerekturen" kommentiert. Ein bessere Änderungssatzkommentar wäre z.B. "Veraltete/Doppelte/... Wander/Radweg Relationen nach Überprüfung g... commented 2026-06-20 15:11:36 UTC by FroschForscher ♦155 |
| 184341900 (Comments: 2) | Arianghavidel (Discussed changesets: 1) | لطفا توضیح مستند بدهید. در غیر این صورت مجبورم برگشت بزنم commented 2026-06-20 15:00:13 UTC by elsy1 ♦200 |
| 184283287 (Comments: 4) | Stalker61 (Discussed changesets: 102) | Вот с этим товарисчем https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DenchikBorovoy2011/history#map=6/50.54/37.62 лучше работу проводите. Явно будет полезнее для проекта. commented 2026-06-20 14:59:56 UTC by Stalker61 ♦322 |
| 180952030 (Comments: 1) | mctheduck (Discussed changesets: 7) | Teilrevert, Försterin hat vor Ort nachgeschaut . Schild ordnungsgemäß vorhanden. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8262172892/history commented 2026-06-20 14:58:25 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,436 |
 | 141720731 (Comments: 2) | Guxim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! The source is a physical memorial plaque installed at the entrance of the site by local municipal institutions, officially marking it as the Jewish Cemetery. Although the individual gravestones are no longer visible, the site is officially re... commented 2026-06-20 14:47:28 UTC by Guxim ♦1 |
| 182291369 (Comments: 2) | Nautico2022 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá Nautico2022, Por que classificou várias rodovias nesta região como primary? Existe um padrão de classificação adotado pela comunidade https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica... commented 2026-06-20 14:44:57 UTC by santamariense ♦853 |
| 181733517 (Comments: 1) | alison2002 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá alison2002, O site de rodovias do Mato Grosso não determina a forma como as rodovias são classificadas no OSM. Como você chegou a essa conclusão? A classificação viária utilizad... commented 2026-06-20 14:38:12 UTC by santamariense ♦853 |
| 184319755 (Comments: 1) | rlaracol (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hola. Por favor no pegar los bosques a los caminos. Terminan siempre un poco antes. O se consideran continuos sobre caminos terciarios o menores, pero nunca pegados. saludos commented 2026-06-20 14:35:08 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 184351786 (Comments: 3) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 10) | If you don't know what you're doing, do me and the community a favor and stop what you're doing. It might sound harsh, but you're making so many mistakes that it's not funny anymore. You're making the map unnecessarily w... commented 2026-06-20 14:34:42 UTC by Comino ♦357 |
| 184326215 (Comments: 1) | OmegaBites (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. las animitas puedes ser un =wayside_shrine o =wayside_cross. No son un memorial en OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross |
| 184336979 (Comments: 1) | Eddie Bórquez (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Realmente un portón tiene un nombre? a qué se refiere 32? En OSM el tag name= es para cosas oficiales, quizás eso es una manera de llamarlo para alguien que trabaja en el aeropuerto, pero en OSM hay otros tags para eso. ... commented 2026-06-20 14:17:09 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 184346047 (Comments: 1) | Staalblauw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-20 14:15:41 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184354565 (Comments: 1) | vietnam321 (Discussed changesets: 26) | This changeset has wrong source and comment. My mistake. commented 2026-06-20 14:06:45 UTC by vietnam321 ♦15 |
| 183886823 (Comments: 21) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 175) | Если углубляться в тему, то по мне, чтобы не плодить сущности, для противопожарного рва подходит более логичная схема тегирования с уточ... commented 2026-06-20 13:56:58 UTC by amgusha ♦20 |
| 184352176 (Comments: 1) | Staalblauw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Staalblauw.. we gebruiken in Nederland de adresnodes. Dus je hoeft geen adresinfo op gebouwomtrekken te zetten. Haal je het weer weg? Mvg.. eggie commented 2026-06-20 13:55:44 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 171756703 (Comments: 3) | Danysan95 (Discussed changesets: 16) | fatto commented 2026-06-20 13:51:54 UTC by Una tantum ♦28 |
| 184324150 (Comments: 2) | thatonedoge (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for the tip! commented 2026-06-20 13:44:59 UTC by thatonedoge ♦2 |
| 184087441 (Comments: 1) | Hoang1234567 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what's the reason you removed the ferry tags and added some that are not used in other places? from_station_code to_station_code waterbus_route commented 2026-06-20 13:44:02 UTC by mueschel ♦7,198 |
| 183973615 (Comments: 7) | canfe (Discussed changesets: 56) | Mi trovi parzialmente d'accordo. Nel senso che è vero che è meglio trovare il paziente che il negozio, ma il civico è pur sempre un riferimento per il negozio. Piuttosto, andrebbero indicati i civici su nodi entrance=* e se ... commented 2026-06-20 13:42:59 UTC by Mannivu ♦276 |
| 184351993 (Comments: 1) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 10) | You are not allowed to use the description tag like you do. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description Please delete this tag. The pin is on the sidewalk which is not allowed. How have you verified this merchants is accepting... commented 2026-06-20 13:30:39 UTC by Comino ♦357 |
| 184351885 (Comments: 1) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 10) | The tags you are using for opening hours are incorrect. Please check one of our wiki’s. https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki How have you verified this merchants is accepting Bitcoin? Edwin Comino BTC M... commented 2026-06-20 13:18:20 UTC by Comino ♦357 |
| 184351348 (Comments: 1) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Please read how to add new nodes on either OSM or on one of our wiki’s. https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki How have you verified this merchants is accepting Bitcoin? Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-06-20 13:14:47 UTC by Comino ♦357 |
| 183945177 (Comments: 1) | Keanu@02 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Keanu, can you look at the phone number for the Reality you added, it is missing digits. thx. commented 2026-06-20 13:09:38 UTC by wireguy ♦572 |
| 183834112 (Comments: 1) | Vespertino (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hola. Has usado la etiqueta "tourism=information" incorrectamente en muchos puntos de interés. Por favor revisa la wiki de osm para informarte como usarla. He corregido algunos, pero te rogaría que revisases tus ediciones para... commented 2026-06-20 13:04:34 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦367 |
| 184351563 (Comments: 1) | Salie_vh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Adding the barriers is fine but I think there is a problem with this changeset. The title claims that you added a chicane barrier. In reality, you drew entire new cycleways along roads. This road already had properties to... commented 2026-06-20 12:39:06 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 184191411 (Comments: 2) | vik3dvik3d (Discussed changesets: 2) | Az Eötvös köz név 2013-ban megváltozott Gábor Miklós utcára, ez van a táblán is, visszaállítottam. commented 2026-06-20 12:37:28 UTC by vasony ♦576 |
 | 183981849 (Comments: 3) | molopoly (Discussed changesets: 1) | What do you mean by "get this bridge up in the air"? maxheight and minheight are restrictions for the traffic on the bridge, but no tags describing the size of the bridge. commented 2026-06-20 12:34:25 UTC by mueschel ♦7,198 |
| 184060260 (Comments: 1) | Straßenvervollständiger (Discussed changesets: 3) | Selbes Problem, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184348183#c1614595 commented 2026-06-20 12:27:16 UTC by rene78 ♦480 |
| 184060676 (Comments: 1) | Straßenvervollständiger (Discussed changesets: 3) | Selbes Problem, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184348183#c1614595 commented 2026-06-20 12:27:08 UTC by rene78 ♦480 |
| 177793819 (Comments: 4) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ďakujem za info commented 2026-06-20 12:27:06 UTC by martin_schnurer ♦3 |
| 172801418 (Comments: 6) | Mister_R2 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Labi, paldies par šo informāciju! Turpmāk būšu uzmanīgāks. commented 2026-06-20 12:26:37 UTC by Mister_R2 ♦28 |
| 182630076 (Comments: 1) | Party Adda (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted SEO spam and malformed tags added to building way for POI in changeset 184350850 https://osm.org/changeset/184350850 commented 2026-06-20 12:12:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182652747 (Comments: 1) | Party Adda (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted SEO spam and malformed tags added to building way for POI in changeset 184350850 https://osm.org/changeset/184350850 commented 2026-06-20 12:12:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182629590 (Comments: 1) | Party Adda (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted SEO spam and malformed tags added to building way for POI in changeset 184350773 https://osm.org/changeset/184350773 commented 2026-06-20 12:11:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182629745 (Comments: 1) | Party Adda (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted SEO spam and malformed tags added to building way for POI in changeset 184350773 https://osm.org/changeset/184350773 commented 2026-06-20 12:11:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182652934 (Comments: 1) | Party Adda (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted SEO spam and malformed tags added to building way for POI in changeset 184350773 https://osm.org/changeset/184350773 commented 2026-06-20 12:10:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 159413418 (Comments: 1) | Dom61 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ciao @Dom61, non è più una farmacia, forse potresti togliere anche dispensing=yes che ne pensi? commented 2026-06-20 12:05:27 UTC by Una tantum ♦28 |
| 183547179 (Comments: 1) | msylka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed overly marketing description=* and cleaned up other SEO/malformed tags for POI in changeset 184350367 https://osm.org/changeset/184350367 commented 2026-06-20 12:02:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182383083 (Comments: 1) | expressplumbingnj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184350234 https://osm.org/changeset/184350234 commented 2026-06-20 11:58:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184345824 (Comments: 4) | Map47 (Discussed changesets: 99) | For name=, the question is how it's actually spelled on the ground. How it must be spelled in Quebec or Paris doesn't matter. OSMOSE's spelling checks in Geneva are generally problematic, or by its own terminology just "ba... commented 2026-06-20 11:54:13 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
| 182597722 (Comments: 1) | strongheating (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184350077 https://osm.org/changeset/184350077 commented 2026-06-20 11:53:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184146197 (Comments: 3) | BrummsLee (Discussed changesets: 28) | Danke, kein Problem passiert. commented 2026-06-20 11:52:35 UTC by onterof ♦42 |
| 184177677 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | "First of all, I would like to thank user VLD0251 for drawing my attention to the contributions of user test0022012, which truly amazed me. Secondly, even if user test0022012 is temporarily suspended, what is the reason for deleting his contr... commented 2026-06-20 11:52:18 UTC by josm19902026 ♦14 |
| 184177679 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | "First of all, I would like to thank user VLD0251 for drawing my attention to the contributions of user test0022012, which truly amazed me. Secondly, even if user test0022012 is temporarily suspended, what is the reason for deleting his contr... commented 2026-06-20 11:52:11 UTC by josm19902026 ♦14 |
| 184177681 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | "First of all, I would like to thank user VLD0251 for drawing my attention to the contributions of user test0022012, which truly amazed me. Secondly, even if user test0022012 is temporarily suspended, what is the reason for deleting his contr... commented 2026-06-20 11:52:03 UTC by josm19902026 ♦14 |
| 184177691 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | "First of all, I would like to thank user VLD0251 for drawing my attention to the contributions of user test0022012, which truly amazed me. Secondly, even if user test0022012 is temporarily suspended, what is the reason for deleting his contr... commented 2026-06-20 11:51:47 UTC by josm19902026 ♦14 |
| 184177695 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | "First of all, I would like to thank user VLD0251 for drawing my attention to the contributions of user test0022012, which truly amazed me. Secondly, even if user test0022012 is temporarily suspended, what is the reason for deleting his contr... commented 2026-06-20 11:50:39 UTC by josm19902026 ♦14 |
| 182490392 (Comments: 1) | Eurostop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184349731 https://osm.org/changeset/184349731 commented 2026-06-20 11:41:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184348316 (Comments: 1) | ollegol (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks for the fix. It looks like a previous mapper was confused because of a C1 sign (which is in reality a warning that a real one-way restriction comes later). However, regarding the changeset description, we have to insist again: People sh... commented 2026-06-20 11:41:02 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 184195578 (Comments: 1) | pyram (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hallo pyram, vielen Dank für die Ergänzung des Defibrillators in Großhabersdorf. Ein Tipp dazu: Mit wenigen weiteren Tags (siehe auch [1]) kann so ein Eintrag noch deutlich aufgewertet werden, etwa mit Informationen zur Zugäng... commented 2026-06-20 11:31:28 UTC by bigbug21 ♦160 |
| 182935158 (Comments: 2) | alessio916 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Meant to link it before, sorry, but see https://osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions for more information. Thanks! commented 2026-06-20 11:29:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183865009 (Comments: 1) | nbmbrokers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184349257 https://osm.org/changeset/184349257 commented 2026-06-20 11:27:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182020935 (Comments: 1) | Goiglstein (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Golgistein, Thanks for contributing to the map. However, this is unfortunately not how you indicate a buisness is closed on OSM; `closed` is not a valid value for opening_hours=* and status=* is a deprecated tag, with `closed` not even bein... commented 2026-06-20 11:17:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183915701 (Comments: 10) | amgusha (Discussed changesets: 6) | Вы, как обычно, передёргиваете. "Не выиграл, а проиграл и т.п." В прошлый раз, не год, а два года назад, речь была про временную тропу, пр... commented 2026-06-20 11:16:44 UTC by amgusha ♦20 |
| 184342191 (Comments: 2) | churts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Welcome to OSM. Just to let you know units are tagged in Australia as addr:unit. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Addresses There are about 500,000 uses of addr:uni... commented 2026-06-20 11:13:22 UTC by TheSwavu ♦653 |
| 184154542 (Comments: 1) | Grand Junction Paving (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags in changeset 184348673 https://osm.org/changeset/184348673 commented 2026-06-20 11:11:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183011562 (Comments: 1) | electrifiedsolutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground, in changeset 184348654 https://osm.org/changeset/184348654 commented 2026-06-20 11:10:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182161463 (Comments: 1) | High Desert Sports and Spine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184348579 https://osm.org/changeset/184348579 commented 2026-06-20 11:08:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182210571 (Comments: 1) | Finest Rooter and Plumbing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184348560 https://osm.org/changeset/184348560 commented 2026-06-20 11:07:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184346407 (Comments: 2) | Njii (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oups sorry for that. I will try to be more cautious next time. commented 2026-06-20 11:07:33 UTC by Njii ♦2 |
| 182255052 (Comments: 1) | Malibu Junk Removal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, as well as spamdelism of helipad, in changeset 184348436 https://osm.org/changeset/184348436 commented 2026-06-20 11:04:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182254976 (Comments: 1) | Malibu Junk Removal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184348436 https://osm.org/changeset/184348436 commented 2026-06-20 11:04:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184106981 (Comments: 9) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | And hey @Jfact0ry , I certainly understand your frustration when your work gets reverted, especially without giving you a chance to discuss it first, when in this case these are both legitimate, recognized ways to map addresses)--I know how easy it c... commented 2026-06-20 10:44:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦252 |
| 184345776 (Comments: 1) | Lucas VanHufflen (Discussed changesets: 2) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Place Noord had been added last August, immediately after its opening. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418714951 Please do not create duplicate objects. commented 2026-06-20 10:42:00 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 183977514 (Comments: 2) | Jonaes (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, I'd say so, yeah. CTS - Contactless Train Stop is the current train protection system of the Glasgow Subway - see for example at the bottom of https://seinwezen.net/functievervullers/automatische-trein-beinvloeding/ATP-ATC%20examples/... commented 2026-06-20 10:38:38 UTC by Jonaes ♦18 |
| 149611941 (Comments: 1) | LARRERE Corinne (Discussed changesets: 3) | bonjour, cas d'école intéressant, avec l'exemple d'Amou https://lannuaire.service-public.gouv.fr/nouvelle-aquitaine/landes/1e581983-b052-4dc3-9ea7-ef808a153fec donc les horaires sur la page regroupent les... commented 2026-06-20 10:30:52 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,336 |
| 184345664 (Comments: 1) | Lucas VanHufflen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for spotting this new bar. Just one thing: the bar was not on the map… but the address already existed. If you add the bar, make sure to add just a bar and please do not type an address to it; by doi... commented 2026-06-20 10:29:01 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 173279541 (Comments: 3) | wuff57 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Den Poller hatte ich vorm Kommentieren nicht gesehen. Mein optischer Nachtrag: changeset/184347228 commented 2026-06-20 10:21:34 UTC by Hb- ♦379 |
| 184346367 (Comments: 1) | Anon_gc67 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Source: Local Knowledge commented 2026-06-20 10:21:03 UTC by Anon_gc67 ♦1 |
 | 184344779 (Comments: 1) | jhingea (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please check the validation tool to find errors and solve them before uploading your work. 36 residential areas shows crossing buildings. I invalidate this task . Best regards commented 2026-06-20 10:20:23 UTC by Frans S ♦10,686 |
| 184317195 (Comments: 1) | Kieran Dart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap I see you're interested in adding MTB tracks in this area. If you are interested in really mapping these trails in as much detail as possible, then you might want to read the wiki page on MTB tagging. It... commented 2026-06-20 10:16:02 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,685 |
| 184317097 (Comments: 1) | Pucciotrex30 (Discussed changesets: 63) | ciao, ti è finito un nodo in un marciapiede dell'altra strada, risolto io https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184347064 commented 2026-06-20 10:14:28 UTC by Martinligabue ♦52 |
| 172197269 (Comments: 1) | Mattia94raggio (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Mattia94raggio forse andrebbero tolti anche dispensing=no\t e healthcare=pharmacy che ne pensi? commented 2026-06-20 10:14:19 UTC by Una tantum ♦28 |
| 65507898 (Comments: 1) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 212) | Что вы пытались обозначить этой линией? https://osm.org/way/655249659 Дороги тут как-то не наблюдается commented 2026-06-20 10:13:14 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 174567841 (Comments: 1) | Günter-CW (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hallo Günter-CW, ich bin gerade über ein mapping von Dir gestolpert, wo StreetComplete vielleicht nicht die Situation vollständig erkennt hat. Es geht um den Weg osm.org/way/23299524. Der ist m.E. ein unechte Einbahnstraße (siehe... commented 2026-06-20 10:11:17 UTC by wuff57 ♦56 |
| 184333140 (Comments: 1) | Papweer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you! commented 2026-06-20 10:09:54 UTC by jayaddison ♦36 |
| 184279505 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | Thanks Flappy, got to it quicker than I could! Also nonsensical tagging, blatant advertising, and to top it all off a changeset source=* of Google Maps to boot. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using O... commented 2026-06-20 10:08:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184344905 (Comments: 6) | Lauver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Volgens mij moet motorcar=no inderdaad toegevoegd volgens de wiki. Dit zal automatisch toegevoegd worden aan een fietsoplaadpunt wat toegevoegd wordt via de Denchargi app. Ja leuk idee om er iets over te vertellen. Misschien als de app klaar i... commented 2026-06-20 10:01:33 UTC by Lauver ♦1 |
| 183767095 (Comments: 3) | caboulot (Discussed changesets: 8) | Pas de soucis, j'ai corrigé ^^ J'ai eu peur qu'il s'agisse d'une copie d'une autre source sans vérification sur le terrain. commented 2026-06-20 09:57:13 UTC by barley383 ♦4 |
| 184325977 (Comments: 1) | VOVOCHKA16 (Discussed changesets: 2) | не надо дублировать объекты. Откачу. commented 2026-06-20 09:37:25 UTC by literan ♦7,145 |
| 184216320 (Comments: 2) | educativa di strada Valsugana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ho ripristinato gli oggetti (edifici, barriere, parcheggi per disabili, etc.) cancellati senza motivo. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184216320 ... commented 2026-06-20 09:31:18 UTC by MarcoR ♦600 |
| 183926191 (Comments: 1) | Bal4zsOSMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ha a számára gondolsz, már nem 682-es, és már nem országos főút. Üdv: Ákos commented 2026-06-20 09:17:16 UTC by itineris ♦423 |
| 184318458 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi, there are several problems with your edits on this junction: - some turning restrictions are broken, i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1916157 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1460113 - you deleted most of the lane in... commented 2026-06-20 09:16:40 UTC by Till_btn ♦45 |
| 184344893 (Comments: 1) | Njii (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Nice edit. Just an error when using the tags, you tagged them as "building"="part=yes", which will not be understood by 3D renders. The correct tag is the one you wrote in the description, i.e., "buildin... commented 2026-06-20 09:15:52 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 184344568 (Comments: 2) | Wijnand Bolle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ik heb het als bovenstaand aangepast. Wellicht ben je ook in de war met destination ipv designated. commented 2026-06-20 09:03:58 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184328183 (Comments: 3) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 89) | I had a vision that next week it will be as smooth as last Thursday... commented 2026-06-20 09:03:46 UTC by rhhs ♦218 |
| 166227431 (Comments: 1) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 384) | Deze brug viel me op bij het kijken naar het gebruik van emergency=no. Weet je nog waarom die er op staat? De note die je oploste zegt daar niets over. Hij lijkt meegekomen te zijn met de highway=construction. (https://community.openstreetmap.... commented 2026-06-20 09:00:16 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦767 |
| 184342691 (Comments: 1) | Gusio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Je hoeft geen adresgegevens toe te voegen in OSM. Er zijn al adresnodes. Ik heb het adres weer verwijderd. MVG,... commented 2026-06-20 08:48:46 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184343415 (Comments: 1) | PietD66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback. De adresnode heb ik ook verwijderd. Er is nog een originele adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Communi... commented 2026-06-20 08:44:35 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184324855 (Comments: 2) | netpeel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Noted! I'll keep that in mind next time. commented 2026-06-20 08:39:18 UTC by netpeel ♦1 |
| 183227215 (Comments: 1) | Schaimer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus, vielen Dank für deine Anpassung! Bist du dir sicher, dass hier nur Wassergräben sind? Ich bin letzte Woche dort vorbeigekommen, und außer den ursprünglich eingetragenen Wegen (tracktype grade 3 oder 4) konnte ich... commented 2026-06-20 08:28:12 UTC by MK2705 ♦8 |
 | 184306923 (Comments: 1) | joedal-osm (Discussed changesets: 14) | Where was this terrible import discussed? It is of bad quality. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-6.23346&lat=8.62288&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1 Please fix th... commented 2026-06-20 08:24:59 UTC by ratrun ♦288 |
| 183897290 (Comments: 2) | cxs (Discussed changesets: 28) | Wie unten erkennbar ging aus der Relation 11106456 weitgehend die Relation 20957831 hervor, welche nun den Schlüsselwert "winter_sports" statt bisher "meadow" beinhaltet. In wie weit dieser angemessen ist, sei dahingestellt. ... commented 2026-06-20 08:10:24 UTC by cxs ♦6 |
| 163108128 (Comments: 2) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 94) | nice find. we can update the pipeline route. It also seems that the junction is at Tunks Park, so the section from Wollstonecraft to Brightmore Reserve likely routes via Tunks Park. commented 2026-06-20 08:08:39 UTC by aharvey ♦1,945 |
| 177263747 (Comments: 3) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 89) | EveryDoor works offline aswell. You just need to download the data and map tiles in advance. commented 2026-06-20 08:01:40 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦931 |
| 184054936 (Comments: 2) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 25) | Please accept my apologies Wynndale this was an error on my part. I see you have rightly changed it back and the syntax remains correct commented 2026-06-20 07:53:29 UTC by ⇄ john paul jones & gringo ♦30 |
| 182575890 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:51:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575885 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:51:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575880 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:51:13 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575877 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:50:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575872 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:50:29 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575871 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:50:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575868 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:50:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575862 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:49:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575858 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:49:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575855 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:49:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182575704 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:49:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182491757 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:48:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182491755 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:48:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182491749 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:48:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182491747 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:47:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182491745 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:47:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182491744 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:47:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182491742 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:47:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182491736 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted commented 2026-06-20 07:46:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 11853062 (Comments: 1) | FF_Wattens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, worum handelt es sich bei den BEG NA Objekten? Tlw. gibt es hier keine Gebäude, und jedenfalls keine Adressen. Könnte ev. mit anderen Tags (ref, object:*, layer etc.) abgebildet werden. commented 2026-06-20 07:29:16 UTC by wolfbert ♦178 |
| 158125086 (Comments: 7) | billybobbyjoe (Discussed changesets: 14) | hi, i removed access=private from node/12050656673 - this ladder has always been public commented 2026-06-20 07:24:45 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦492 |
| 165023612 (Comments: 1) | Kookykooky (Discussed changesets: 79) | this is not an alpine hut for tourism any more, only a museum commented 2026-06-20 07:23:47 UTC by kuhni74 ♦459 |
| 183699779 (Comments: 1) | VRNHN Eric Kramer (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bedoel je met emergency=no dat geen enkele hulpdienst daar kan komen, of alleen dat ze het beste die route kunnen vermijden? Het lijkt me wenselijk dat dit wel routeert voor de laatste paar honderd meters naar een locatie. Houdt de routeplanner (Live... commented 2026-06-20 07:17:57 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦767 |
| 183155686 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 980) | Thanks for picking up my typo. commented 2026-06-20 06:41:21 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦433 |
| 182685269 (Comments: 2) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 19) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513922976/history - to są ślady traktora na polu po tym jak pryskał itp nie mapujemy tego commented 2026-06-20 06:14:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 35285935 (Comments: 1) | NoelB (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380094014/ A changeset from the before times. I'm NOT sure who created this issue first or how it was created, but incline=80 is exceptionally steep, do you mean 1/80? Or maybe maxspeed=... commented 2026-06-20 06:13:43 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,168 |
| 183777556 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340622 commented 2026-06-20 06:10:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183778223 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340595 commented 2026-06-20 06:09:14 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183779540 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340551 commented 2026-06-20 06:06:54 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
 | 182176542 (Comments: 1) | zinderMT (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, do you know why the Solomon Islands boundaries are mostly broken? https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=158.78187&lat=-8.36786&zoom=8 commented 2026-06-20 06:06:29 UTC by nevw ♦2,245 |
| 183779201 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340517 commented 2026-06-20 06:05:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183777547 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340471 commented 2026-06-20 06:02:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183777127 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340397 commented 2026-06-20 06:00:01 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184261752 (Comments: 2) | 小原酱 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ok commented 2026-06-20 05:56:04 UTC by 小原酱 ♦2 |
| 183776109 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340300 commented 2026-06-20 05:56:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182734478 (Comments: 3) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340193 commented 2026-06-20 05:52:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182777644 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted by 184340193 commented 2026-06-20 05:52:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183779551 (Comments: 2) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184340133 commented 2026-06-20 05:47:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183779205 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184340123 commented 2026-06-20 05:46:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183778232 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184340102 commented 2026-06-20 05:45:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183777563 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184340086 commented 2026-06-20 05:44:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183777130 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184340068 commented 2026-06-20 05:43:43 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 125596695 (Comments: 1) | lufticus (Discussed changesets: 7) | Guten Tag, hat die Beauty Boutique (1193559075) immer noch "Vorübergehend montags u. samstags geschlossen" ? commented 2026-06-20 05:41:59 UTC by Josef73 ♦300 |
| 183776671 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184340036 commented 2026-06-20 05:41:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184188525 (Comments: 1) | amta68 (Discussed changesets: 4) | کدگذاری معابر اشتباه نیست و درست است. منبع یافت شد: https://shaghool.ir/Files/286177_6-8-314-2.pdf commented 2026-06-20 05:41:06 UTC by Amirali Asghari ♦1 |
| 183776115 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184340003 commented 2026-06-20 05:39:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183775842 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339913 commented 2026-06-20 05:35:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183774957 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339890 commented 2026-06-20 05:34:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183369787 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339865 commented 2026-06-20 05:33:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183009957 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339826 commented 2026-06-20 05:31:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182951763 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339792 commented 2026-06-20 05:29:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182594586 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339732 commented 2026-06-20 05:26:32 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182576833 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339712 commented 2026-06-20 05:25:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183774365 (Comments: 1) | SWEdebe (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339677 commented 2026-06-20 05:23:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184319748 (Comments: 5) | pereelmagne (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, I've moved it to Dartmouth Road south of the river, here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289446720#map=19/51.437117/-0.054304&layers=N Regards Bernard. commented 2026-06-20 05:09:01 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 183901041 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks for all your edits! Everything looks all good with this one. commented 2026-06-20 04:56:33 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 184286371 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339240 https://osm.org/changeset/184339240 commented 2026-06-20 04:56:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183900756 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks OK to me commented 2026-06-20 04:56:03 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 183900830 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks good, probably should be converted to an area for the whole parking area if possible in the future commented 2026-06-20 04:55:49 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 184286217 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339235 https://osm.org/changeset/184339235 commented 2026-06-20 04:55:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184283617 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339226 https://osm.org/changeset/184339226 commented 2026-06-20 04:55:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184282707 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339217 https://osm.org/changeset/184339217 commented 2026-06-20 04:54:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184282551 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339191 https://osm.org/changeset/184339191 commented 2026-06-20 04:54:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184282330 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339187 https://osm.org/changeset/184339187 commented 2026-06-20 04:54:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184282133 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339182 https://osm.org/changeset/184339182 commented 2026-06-20 04:53:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184281960 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339179 https://osm.org/changeset/184339179 commented 2026-06-20 04:53:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184281780 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339172 https://osm.org/changeset/184339172 commented 2026-06-20 04:52:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184281627 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339167 https://osm.org/changeset/184339167 commented 2026-06-20 04:52:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184281370 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339158 https://osm.org/changeset/184339158 commented 2026-06-20 04:52:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184280497 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339147 https://osm.org/changeset/184339147 commented 2026-06-20 04:51:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 184280338 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339139 https://osm.org/changeset/184339139 commented 2026-06-20 04:51:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184280193 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339134 https://osm.org/changeset/184339134 commented 2026-06-20 04:50:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184280044 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339127 https://osm.org/changeset/184339127 commented 2026-06-20 04:50:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184274838 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339118 https://osm.org/changeset/184339118 commented 2026-06-20 04:50:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184274562 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339115 https://osm.org/changeset/184339115 commented 2026-06-20 04:49:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184274324 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339105 https://osm.org/changeset/184339105 commented 2026-06-20 04:49:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184233043 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339098 https://osm.org/changeset/184339098 commented 2026-06-20 04:48:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 184232949 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339092 https://osm.org/changeset/184339092 commented 2026-06-20 04:48:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184232462 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339083 https://osm.org/changeset/184339083 commented 2026-06-20 04:47:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184232333 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339073 https://osm.org/changeset/184339073 commented 2026-06-20 04:47:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184232217 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339068 https://osm.org/changeset/184339068 commented 2026-06-20 04:46:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184231588 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339059 https://osm.org/changeset/184339059 commented 2026-06-20 04:46:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184231389 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339041 https://osm.org/changeset/184339041 commented 2026-06-20 04:45:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184320563 (Comments: 1) | MountMapper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi! Ich habe die Fehler behoben. Aber kannst Du demnächst bei solchen Bearbeitungen auf Buslinienrelationen achten? Gruß Senihtu commented 2026-06-20 04:45:29 UTC by Senihtu ♦176 |
| 184231241 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339029 https://osm.org/changeset/184339029 commented 2026-06-20 04:45:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184230961 (Comments: 1) | anchorsbook (Discussed changesets: 27) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339002 https://osm.org/changeset/184339002 commented 2026-06-20 04:43:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183003175 (Comments: 3) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 31) | I don't see any instance of the reference you tagged: "SZ" commented 2026-06-20 04:42:03 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦160 |
| 183900657 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks good! commented 2026-06-20 04:34:30 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 183900617 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks OK commented 2026-06-20 04:31:51 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 183900472 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks good. commented 2026-06-20 04:00:51 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 180436480 (Comments: 3) | segubi (Discussed changesets: 30) | Rund um den LK Oldenburg sind neue Netze entstanden (Stadt OL, LK Diepholz,LK Wesermarsch) und im LK Cloppenburg wurde das Netz engmaschiger. Die Wegweiser im LK OL wurden nur an manchen Stellen angepasst, die Karten bisher gar nicht. Auch Mänge... commented 2026-06-20 03:58:37 UTC by GerdP ♦2,843 |
| 184229889 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184338438 commented 2026-06-20 03:56:32 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184229909 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184338416 commented 2026-06-20 03:54:00 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 183900059 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks for the edits! If this is indeed a seesaw then it should probably have a playground=seesaw tag included as well, otherwise everything else looks good. commented 2026-06-20 03:53:47 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 184230035 (Comments: 3) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184338369 commented 2026-06-20 03:50:50 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 183899903 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks OK to me commented 2026-06-20 03:48:51 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 183900381 (Comments: 1) | finnerwinner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks good to me! I noticed that it was a waterway=ditch but I guess I misread the wiki, waterway=canal is likely more accurate here since it's for irrigation. commented 2026-06-20 03:46:26 UTC by Ielenia ♦9 |
| 184230275 (Comments: 2) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184338308 commented 2026-06-20 03:44:59 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 148906666 (Comments: 1) | claudia10 (Discussed changesets: 51) | This may have been removed. I can check in coming days and update accordingly. commented 2026-06-20 03:44:33 UTC by muhlemann ♦2 |
| 184324742 (Comments: 1) | soloplayeronp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO POI with malformed tags and with a source of Google Maps https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184338304 commented 2026-06-20 03:43:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184334911 (Comments: 1) | dermoth_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! I understand why you might think it's useless to map private driveways, but if it exists on the ground, it's fine to exist on OSM. So no need to delete them. If someone took the time to map them, they deserve to be on the ma... commented 2026-06-20 03:33:45 UTC by ilias_ ♦451 |
| 184187706 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset #184338077 commented 2026-06-20 03:26:09 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184286233 (Comments: 1) | eaglespringspest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello eaglespringspest, welcome to OSM, and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. For future reference, I want to make you aware of the following guidelines for OSM. 1. Avoid abbreviations. Because it's easy for a computer to abb... commented 2026-06-20 03:11:58 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦118 |
| 183857144 (Comments: 1) | SY0649 (Discussed changesets: 13) | 由于魏塔铁路一些废弃乘降所站台目前保存完好，我将部分乘降所的标签由abandoned前缀改回了disused 任家店 鸽子洞 大徐屯等 commented 2026-06-20 02:49:01 UTC by Geo_2695 ♦1 |
| 184315819 (Comments: 1) | pendrex (Discussed changesets: 1) | dua arah; jalan sebelah barat ditutup commented 2026-06-20 02:36:17 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184334149 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 220) | Like I said while NHS classification is a good case for tagging a road as primary, not every segment of that road needs to be tagged as primary, particularly when there's no other reason aside from the NHS designation. In some cases it would be ... commented 2026-06-20 01:40:22 UTC by Joseph R P ♦446 |
| 184336140 (Comments: 1) | carlwev (Discussed changesets: 17) | Helo, Could you please write descriptive changeset comments?Writing "1" doesn't help yourself or others to know what you've been up to Cofion, Ceirios commented 2026-06-20 00:37:23 UTC by ceirios ♦116 |
| 184187186 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset 184336046 commented 2026-06-20 00:29:17 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184187503 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset 184335994 commented 2026-06-20 00:25:20 UTC by sannkc ♦176 |
| 184278502 (Comments: 2) | Tom Landlord (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das wird in NRW Orthophoto noch aktualisiert werden, wenn neue Aufnahmen gemacht worden sind. So aktuell ist das nicht. Quelle ist die Lage vor Ort. commented 2026-06-20 00:04:39 UTC by Tom Landlord ♦1 |
| 184278160 (Comments: 2) | Magneto555 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gracias por avisarme @aTarom, ya he sacado un par de changesets para corregir el error, he borrado todas las referencias a StreetView. Un saludo. commented 2026-06-19 23:37:14 UTC by Magneto555 ♦2 |
 | 180683606 (Comments: 1) | StamppotAndijvie (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, can you fix this invalid multipolygon thanks. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.09650&lat=-8.13982&zoom=15 commented 2026-06-19 23:16:35 UTC by nevw ♦2,245 |
| 181764939 (Comments: 1) | cdcastillob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola cdcastillob, este tipo de mapeo es indoor y tiene otro tipo de etiquetas, además de requerir planos para la precisión. commented 2026-06-19 23:07:00 UTC by AngocA ♦239 |
| 180479204 (Comments: 1) | alxfl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola alxfl, Las etiquetas name de las vías en OSM son los números en Colombia. Los nombres oficiales van en otra etiqueta. commented 2026-06-19 23:02:16 UTC by AngocA ♦239 |
| 183943283 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | Going off of that I believe that would not be the name of the road, and the name isn't used for navigation purposes like a name such as Great Basin Highway (which is signed) would be. I think unless there is some other signposted name, the road ... commented 2026-06-19 22:59:09 UTC by Joseph R P ♦446 |
| 184314386 (Comments: 1) | BSG Commercial (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset reverted as POI is in the wrong location by about 15,000 km. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184334609 commented 2026-06-19 22:42:23 UTC by TheSwavu ♦653 |
| 147867685 (Comments: 1) | Eino81 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Zdar. Je tady (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254375443#map=16/50.00197/14.40111&layers=N) skutečně asfalt ? commented 2026-06-19 22:15:02 UTC by Tomas_J ♦380 |
| 184073584 (Comments: 6) | Adze1 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Excellent, thanks for taking the time to check :) commented 2026-06-19 22:08:27 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,066 |
| 183841929 (Comments: 4) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 49) | Ich habs gerade nochmals angepasst mit allen Hinweisen. Ich hoffe, es passt jetzt. Die Öffnungszeiten sind jetzt inkl. Modifier vollständig mit dem Öffnungszeitentool von Vespucci erstellt. commented 2026-06-19 22:06:15 UTC by Makeena ♦62 |
| 184298960 (Comments: 1) | Majiku (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Majiku, du hast bei Lohbachsiedlung West, tactile_paving=no gesetzt, jedoch ist dort ein Aufmerksamkeitsfeld mit Auffanglinie vorhanden, also definitiv tactile_paving=yes. Siehe: https://api.panoramax.xyz/en/index?focus=pic&map=17.16/47.... commented 2026-06-19 22:04:19 UTC by cowboyxup ♦36 |
| 184095508 (Comments: 4) | mathsaey (Discussed changesets: 2) | I passed by today to check out the situation: - There is indeed no street sign on the path along the Herman Teilinck building. - There is no indication of a road to come on the roads I edited (though the gate on the Dieudonné L. stre... commented 2026-06-19 21:59:23 UTC by mathsaey ♦2 |
| 146215707 (Comments: 1) | nessie2010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hydrant wurde Anfang 2026 abgebaut commented 2026-06-19 21:32:00 UTC by YannickXY ♦1 |
| 184071232 (Comments: 2) | zbh0170 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Merci. J'ai eu un peu de mal à modifier dans le secteur en raison de verrouillages et c'est peut-être lié (et malgré aussi la vérification faites après coup qui n'a pas suffit) commented 2026-06-19 21:30:03 UTC by zbh0170 ♦5 |
| 183886673 (Comments: 2) | Papweer_Import (Discussed changesets: 1) | The lamp is actually on the footway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39089498) way as one of its nodes, so wasn't conflated as to not move the footway. I've simply removed the tagging from the node as a fix in this changeset https://www.o... commented 2026-06-19 21:29:06 UTC by Papweer_Import ♦1 |
| 183854360 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | Done 👍 This changeset has been reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184332843 commented 2026-06-19 21:16:47 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
| 184322602 (Comments: 1) | Søren Juul Jellesen (Discussed changesets: 1) | maxspeed:advisory=30 commented 2026-06-19 21:04:32 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,852 |
| 184331305 (Comments: 1) | iMacThere4iAm (Discussed changesets: 11) | *Heathfoot Avenue. commented 2026-06-19 20:20:37 UTC by iMacThere4iAm ♦13 |
| 184268896 (Comments: 3) | saitam (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, bin komplett durch: Am nördlichen Ende steht nur das erfaßte Schild, am anderen Ende merkt man nicht einmal, daß man den Poetensteig verläßt oder betritt. Auch während der Strecke keine Hinweise auf einen Wande... commented 2026-06-19 20:19:43 UTC by saitam ♦1 |
| 182166817 (Comments: 1) | Maxim Gribanov (Discussed changesets: 1) | К сожалению 2ГИС для правок использовать нельзя commented 2026-06-19 20:03:02 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 182462048 (Comments: 1) | SergeiBelyakov (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-06-19 20:00:18 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
| 184319501 (Comments: 5) | Thomasje (Discussed changesets: 7) | reverted by changeset #184330380 Check even die placenode in het centrum. commented 2026-06-19 19:52:06 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184277576 (Comments: 3) | Atlas of Westeros (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi again Ceirios, On second thoughts, I will indeed move to uMap. Best, Rob commented 2026-06-19 19:48:39 UTC by Atlas of Westeros ♦1 |
| 184328219 (Comments: 2) | emmzheuz (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted by changeset #184330096 commented 2026-06-19 19:44:57 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 181721862 (Comments: 1) | Tobias Ziegler (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo! Kleine Bemerkungen zu deiner Bearbeitung am Rathaus-Carrée (siehe auch Bemerkungen zu Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181724719!) – die Situation dort ist wirklich komplex … Du hast dort mit ... commented 2026-06-19 19:33:07 UTC by goodidea ♦135 |
| 181724719 (Comments: 1) | Tobias Ziegler (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo! Kleine Bemerkungen zu deiner Bearbeitung am Rathaus-Carrée (siehe auch Bemerkungen zu Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181721862): die Situation dort ist wirklich komplex … ich habe da schon viel bearbeite... commented 2026-06-19 19:32:56 UTC by goodidea ♦135 |
| 184257357 (Comments: 1) | noе (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, was soll denn das für eine "Touristenattraktion" sein? Der Kolonnenweg existiert als Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15752337/ und er ist ja kein Punkt. Ist da eine Infotafel oder was ist an dem ... commented 2026-06-19 19:06:51 UTC by Manuel H ♦81 |
 | 184294774 (Comments: 1) | BinkalB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi BinkalB, your changeset comment says "added building", but edited a place node as a clock. Review what you edit before you hit save. commented 2026-06-19 18:30:28 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦165 |
| 173730623 (Comments: 2) | webfil (Discussed changesets: 22) | I don't know. This tag was inherited from the Canvec import, when joining multiple objects with similar tags. You may rather ask J. N. Squire (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29742958). commented 2026-06-19 18:23:38 UTC by webfil ♦43 |
| 184327288 (Comments: 1) | 6totheworld (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello 6totheworld, Please respond to my comment on your earlier edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184290446 commented 2026-06-19 18:19:32 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦388 |
| 184317512 (Comments: 1) | VeronicaDonis2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Revisé los cambios, gracias por los agregados! Corregí la ubicación de los nodos de interpolación. No deberían quedar tan cerca de las calles ni de las esquinas. Cualquier duda nos podés contacta... commented 2026-06-19 18:12:36 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184322012 (Comments: 2) | impact0r (Discussed changesets: 18) | Tam jest to co było tzn. w terenie bo z mapy znikł most (spadek po poprzednikach) który na 90% jest przepustem ale na "pocieszenie" zostało w drodze layer=1. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&... commented 2026-06-19 18:09:35 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦665 |
| 184156329 (Comments: 1) | cabinetcourbi (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2026-06-19 17:52:07 UTC by StC ♦474 |
| 184308152 (Comments: 2) | pthiker (Discussed changesets: 3) | I corrected it in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184326462 commented 2026-06-19 17:45:41 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,070 |
| 184325223 (Comments: 1) | evgenykatyshev (Discussed changesets: 86) | 😭 commented 2026-06-19 17:39:01 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| X | 184325967 (Comments: 1) | ceirios (Discussed changesets: 22) | apologies for long box, I edited Kiribati relation - it's unavoidable. commented 2026-06-19 17:30:55 UTC by ceirios ♦116 |
| 184325527 (Comments: 1) | Chezfisto (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://campfireak.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/23-Marketing-Camp-K-Map-Update_11in-x-8.5in@72dpi_Final-1_AJ.pdf commented 2026-06-19 17:17:55 UTC by Chezfisto ♦6 |
| 184296881 (Comments: 1) | mapl20 (Discussed changesets: 1) | What was the point of the empty object https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13951236102 ? commented 2026-06-19 17:17:26 UTC by gpserror ♦241 |
| 184260902 (Comments: 1) | Laeeba Hafeez Malik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, something went wrong here - all of these objects don't have any proper tag. commented 2026-06-19 17:16:56 UTC by mueschel ♦7,198 |
| 179994255 (Comments: 2) | B Sai Deepthi (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you for the feedback. Apologies for the oversight. I have reviewed the changeset and removed the unnecessary sidewalk stubs that do not support pedestrian routing, based on ground reality. We will ensure such minor and non-functional segments a... commented 2026-06-19 17:11:39 UTC by B Sai Deepthi ♦7 |
| 184292307 (Comments: 3) | mapeditor11 (Discussed changesets: 31) | I have no idea how these changes are made because every other edit you make just says "edit, add places". And you clearly badly used AI for buildings before. If these are drawn manually, then that just means that you are making mistakes you... commented 2026-06-19 17:04:15 UTC by HellMap ♦927 |
| 184323838 (Comments: 1) | SchuyGuy (Discussed changesets: 1) | The building that you removed here IS the new construction: https://fdc.osu.edu/MALC commented 2026-06-19 17:01:51 UTC by MerlinPendragon ♦31 |
| 184246583 (Comments: 3) | Ericksonj (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Ericksonj, thanks for reaching out and keeping an eye on the map! To clarify, your edits unfortunately missed a small connecting segment, which temporarily affected the highway class continuity. To fix this, I updated the highway classi... commented 2026-06-19 16:49:16 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 172827370 (Comments: 2) | hsc666 (Discussed changesets: 38) | Sachen gibt's! 😅 Hab den Namen wieder ergänzt. commented 2026-06-19 16:48:23 UTC by hsc666 ♦484 |
| 184312877 (Comments: 1) | HellMap (Discussed changesets: 104) | This was not ai detected, it's lidar. commented 2026-06-19 16:40:15 UTC by mapeditor11 ♦4 |
| 184198577 (Comments: 2) | Hallamshire123 (Discussed changesets: 6) | I visited today and these road changes have not been made yet. I have reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184323831. OSM should reflect the current state of the world, not the future. I am however looking forward to the... commented 2026-06-19 16:33:26 UTC by ntzm ♦60 |
| 184321789 (Comments: 1) | Lê Tuấn Minh (Discussed changesets: 22) | Mình đang dùng thử StreetComplete nên có thể bị phát sinh đột biến số lượng changeset commented 2026-06-19 16:05:52 UTC by Lê Tuấn Minh ♦26 |
| 165234815 (Comments: 2) | nagy_balint (Discussed changesets: 4) | Szia! Mivel műholdon még nem látszott, és kerítésezett területekről van szó, ezért leginkább becslés és az akkor látható már álló &... commented 2026-06-19 15:55:46 UTC by nagy_balint ♦13 |
| 184321403 (Comments: 1) | bzo2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! A korlátozási kapcsolat maradt, töröltem a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184322034 módosításcsomagban. commented 2026-06-19 15:45:56 UTC by gabro00 ♦347 |
| 159881821 (Comments: 1) | Evamap40 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Salut, tu as ajouté des city_wall, c'est un peu beaucoup pour Ondres non ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:barrier=city%20wall?uselang=fr exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339842675 c'est peut-&e... commented 2026-06-19 15:45:48 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,336 |
| 184242780 (Comments: 1) | Emetas Semaška (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ar čia iš tiesų yra kelias sutampantis su sklypo riba? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/924893553 commented 2026-06-19 15:41:56 UTC by Vaidotas ♦77 |
| 184305865 (Comments: 3) | ReinerMeyer (Discussed changesets: 95) | ah ok, many thanks anyway 🤣 commented 2026-06-19 15:34:01 UTC by demon_box ♦403 |
| 182672559 (Comments: 1) | JausG2 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo JausG2, die Angabe zur Geothermieleistung ist falsch. Der auf der Webseite genannte Wert bezieht sich auf den jährlichen Energiebedarf für Wärme und nicht die stündliche Energieleistung. Das muss daher korrigiert werden. commented 2026-06-19 15:33:00 UTC by Chalcroft ♦32 |
| 184306639 (Comments: 2) | maemolol (Discussed changesets: 3) | i pressed the "none of those" button for the board type, i don't know why streetcomplete in its infinite "wisdom" put "board_type:" though. i'm gonna resolve this in a moment commented 2026-06-19 15:12:39 UTC by maemolol ♦3 |
| 172492349 (Comments: 2) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 59) | Effectivement, c'est une erreur de ma part, ma modification était bien pour le lycée. Bien vu. commented 2026-06-19 15:01:25 UTC by Lisapple ♦69 |
| 184319979 (Comments: 1) | hauke-stieler (Discussed changesets: 44) | Ups, zu schnell Upload gedrückt: "Wegegeometrien rund um Preystraße angepasst/korrigiert" commented 2026-06-19 14:58:23 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦346 |
| 184295841 (Comments: 1) | Wild351 (Discussed changesets: 4) | You are adding untagged lines to OSM. These lines are meaningless. Please stop doing this, please read the mapping guidelines or seek help. If you have questions please just ask, maybe I can help. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-06-19 14:54:38 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 184293618 (Comments: 1) | Wild351 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I've added tags to your buildings, without tags your mapping is meaningless. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-06-19 14:50:07 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 181364294 (Comments: 3) | Olgerts V (Discussed changesets: 4) | Viss kārtībā. Šajā gadījumā kanāla ūdensceļš https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016739831 bija pievienots šiem diviem punktiem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13732148583 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13732148... commented 2026-06-19 14:49:51 UTC by HellMap ♦927 |
| 184293476 (Comments: 2) | BlauweFietsKetting (Discussed changesets: 9) | @goedegazelle, bedankt voor je reactie. Dit was bewust, er is in dit groenvak en eromheen geen bovengrondse brandkraan te vinden. commented 2026-06-19 14:46:00 UTC by BlauweFietsKetting ♦5 |
| 184318541 (Comments: 1) | Thomasje (Discussed changesets: 7) | 👍 commented 2026-06-19 14:42:50 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184313292 (Comments: 2) | Vit_Names (Discussed changesets: 3) | Вы неверно указали мост верните, пожалуйста, на место https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562730025 commented 2026-06-19 14:38:38 UTC by ednzxt ♦17 |
| 184195070 (Comments: 4) | TheGostRider (Discussed changesets: 1) | você pode criar uma conta no UMAP https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pt-br/ e fazer um mapa com o codigo postal de todas as ruas e divugar ate no site da prefeitura, blog's, grupos locais, paginas web. essa forma de mapeamento dos... commented 2026-06-19 14:37:03 UTC by UmbraosmOSM ♦1 |
| 182363137 (Comments: 2) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 17) | Could you also share what source of the address you used? commented 2026-06-19 14:32:05 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦264 |
| 174247337 (Comments: 1) | Turbo_Rafu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Turbo_Rafu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_area should only be in the water, not on the ground like you've added it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447739593 I've corrected this in https://... commented 2026-06-19 14:31:52 UTC by habi ♦2,154 |
| 183813058 (Comments: 3) | bbauer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Perfekt. commented 2026-06-19 14:29:43 UTC by gs3§zba ♦60 |
| 184184138 (Comments: 7) | StreetW (Discussed changesets: 4) | You can check if JOSM still indicates errors or warnings. If I didn't make mistakes it shouldn't find more connection errots. Here you could check if I connected your new ways correctly to the already existing road network. What might be mo... commented 2026-06-19 14:15:29 UTC by ratrun ♦288 |
| 184312710 (Comments: 1) | Vit_Names (Discussed changesets: 3) | Добрый день. Какой источник адресной информации? Описательные названия объектам не присваиваются (Красная будка)! commented 2026-06-19 14:13:35 UTC by ednzxt ♦17 |
| 100180827 (Comments: 2) | Carldobs (Discussed changesets: 4) | There's still a section with paint only separation. I've added a fixme, as I'm not confident editing bus route relations in iD https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184317824 commented 2026-06-19 14:08:02 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,858 |
| 184313510 (Comments: 1) | Vit_Names (Discussed changesets: 3) | Добрый день. Для тегирования устаревших и альтернативных названий есть соответствующие теги old_name, alt_name. Считаю Ваши изменения в части п... commented 2026-06-19 14:04:03 UTC by ednzxt ♦17 |
 | 184222625 (Comments: 1) | 혜리 김 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 184316812 commented 2026-06-19 13:47:43 UTC by World_Winner ♦83 |
| 184314411 (Comments: 1) | Thomasje (Discussed changesets: 7) | Boi.. Zo te zien heb je de landuse grass verwijderd en vervangen door een functie. Beter is het om een losse deken met de parknaam over de landuse heen te leggen. ..leisure park is een transparant die over bos hras en water heen ligt. eggie commented 2026-06-19 13:38:51 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 169819723 (Comments: 1) | CSP40600 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, je suis partagé, j'ai l'impression que c'est des numéros d'appartements, cela ressemble plus à des formes d'adresses, j'ai pas l'impression que les bâtiments sont sépar&... commented 2026-06-19 13:18:18 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,336 |
| 184315756 (Comments: 1) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 171) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184264793 commented 2026-06-19 13:17:37 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 182576185 (Comments: 1) | Jade Jossen (Discussed changesets: 7) | Greetings. Thanks for your edit. Tagging this element as leisure=park does not seem to me as a good practice. Parks are rather set in urban areas, with controlled greenery. I propose tagging this element as a sports centre (leisure=sports_centre), as... commented 2026-06-19 13:17:15 UTC by webfil ♦43 |
| 183209993 (Comments: 1) | Bazsixd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! A facebook oldal címe megfelelően szerepel a contact:facebook=* címkében, ne rakd vissza a honlapnak, ráadásul ez átirányítás, nem az oldal címe. Köszi! Tov&aac... commented 2026-06-19 13:15:48 UTC by infeeeee ♦693 |
| 184277797 (Comments: 2) | tansu_bla (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, Thank you for the feedback! 1) I used landuse=education and left the name(s) and description for clarity. 2) Good to know, I hadn't realized this applied to names of POIs as well. Fixed. 3) Fixed. When I typed "f... commented 2026-06-19 13:03:44 UTC by tansu_bla ♦3 |
| 184291227 (Comments: 2) | Ivanov32ß039ß3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравейте, много благодаря за Вашето изключително любезно съобщение и конструктивната обратна връзка. Намирам това за много добре! Благ... commented 2026-06-19 13:01:15 UTC by Ivanov32ß039ß3 ♦1 |
| 182609573 (Comments: 1) | CSP40600 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, j'ai l'impression de doublon ici entre landuse=residential (ce n'est pas une résidence, c'est un usage résidentiel des sols), building=residential, des name=* aux deux ? csp j'imagine que c�... commented 2026-06-19 12:58:13 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,336 |
| 178617812 (Comments: 3) | Invicta Environmental Pest Defense (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314873 https://osm.org/changeset/184314873 commented 2026-06-19 12:56:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178761269 (Comments: 3) | Gold King at Hickory (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314856 https://osm.org/changeset/184314856 commented 2026-06-19 12:55:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178679539 (Comments: 1) | Susan Cucchiara (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314831 https://osm.org/changeset/184314831 commented 2026-06-19 12:54:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178730888 (Comments: 3) | Ninja Physio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314810 https://osm.org/changeset/184314810 commented 2026-06-19 12:54:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 178914468 (Comments: 3) | Hawaii Mortgage Experts at Honolulu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314787 https://osm.org/changeset/184314787 commented 2026-06-19 12:53:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 179045814 (Comments: 3) | Advance tire shop LLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314763 https://osm.org/changeset/184314763 commented 2026-06-19 12:53:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 103222041 (Comments: 2) | KKK-jp (Discussed changesets: 4) | @Rakkka さん ご連絡ありがとうございます。 先人の方のタグ付けを見た際、広場以外にも、縁石や段差などでエリアが区別できる歩道（highway=footway）のareaマッピングに使われてい... commented 2026-06-19 12:52:54 UTC by KKK-jp ♦4 |
| 179094241 (Comments: 3) | Putnam Plumbing Plumbers in St George Utah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314737 https://osm.org/changeset/184314737 commented 2026-06-19 12:52:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182863120 (Comments: 1) | putnamplumbing (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, in changeset 184314634 https://osm.org/changeset/184314634 commented 2026-06-19 12:51:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 182863284 (Comments: 1) | putnamplumbing (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revert inexplicable deletion of valid building by SEO spammer in changeset 184314634 https://osm.org/changeset/184314634 commented 2026-06-19 12:50:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 179050560 (Comments: 1) | เจตนา แจ่วฮ้อนสูตรเด็ด (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset https://osm.org/changeset/184314543 commented 2026-06-19 12:48:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184305902 (Comments: 1) | WholesaleBackup™ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184314387 https://osm.org/changeset/184314387 commented 2026-06-19 12:43:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184297926 (Comments: 1) | Prime Adventure Outfitters - Mesquite (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184314363 https://osm.org/changeset/184314363 commented 2026-06-19 12:43:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184277756 (Comments: 1) | Calm Minds Matter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184314347 https://osm.org/changeset/184314347 commented 2026-06-19 12:42:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184061549 (Comments: 5) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 362) | Tak du har helt ret:-) Jeg har misforstået situationen commented 2026-06-19 12:36:42 UTC by nordiq_jve ♦3 |
| 148471051 (Comments: 2) | LivingWithDragons (Discussed changesets: 44) | Believed to be dead, but it's not a stump. The tree is still very much there, and large. commented 2026-06-19 12:29:15 UTC by LivingWithDragons ♦57 |
| 183320688 (Comments: 3) | fil63100 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello Comino, Excuse me, I'm not used to this yet. I spoke with the "Bank Exit" group, you're right, I'll remove that point. Sorry. commented 2026-06-19 12:27:43 UTC by fil63100 ♦2 |
| 184305085 (Comments: 1) | Thomasje (Discussed changesets: 7) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-19 12:26:23 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184309628 (Comments: 3) | Thomasje (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi.. Het is geen verwijt overigens. Ik zal je later onze welkomstmail sturen per PB. Veel plezier met mappen, eggie commented 2026-06-19 12:20:18 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184312257 (Comments: 1) | Julien_Ehrmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM. Merci d’avoir signalé l'école manquante. Pour ajouter une école sur la carte, il faut indiquer un tag précis : amenity=school. Sinon, le moteur de carte ne verra... commented 2026-06-19 12:11:45 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,943 |
| 184195182 (Comments: 5) | unitybelle (Discussed changesets: 1) | That's not a street name, but the name of this complex. These are very different things. commented 2026-06-19 12:07:27 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,547 |
| 181307061 (Comments: 4) | Vincent Heurtel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aktuell immer noch Baustelle in den Friedensgasse, daher vom Rollplatz her als Sackgasse gekennzeichnet. Passieren für Fu´ßgänger ist möglich. commented 2026-06-19 12:07:14 UTC by Steube ♦44 |
| 184312308 (Comments: 1) | tomi26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | That's a wrong assumption. We don't split ways "for graphs". The 3rd party software should handle it without changing OSM data. Changeset reverted. commented 2026-06-19 12:00:02 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184286005 (Comments: 6) | CrstblM (Discussed changesets: 20) | ok, quizas lo del bench fue un typo, y el editor con que trabajo te autocompleta. pero en fin. Lo que pasa es que un amenity=shelter es otra cosa, estás haciendo la traducción literal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amen... commented 2026-06-19 11:57:27 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,138 |
| 182084383 (Comments: 2) | cr4pt0pia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Снесённый здания можно либо удалять, либо заменить тег building на was:building. Заменил. commented 2026-06-19 11:56:32 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,534 |
 | 184173765 (Comments: 2) | Altts (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Thanks for fixing that. commented 2026-06-19 11:56:24 UTC by Altts ♦6 |
| 183642546 (Comments: 3) | maemolol (Discussed changesets: 3) | Unfortunately OSM doesn't really have established tags for individual bicycle parking features (not like amenity=parking and amenity=parking_space), so these shouldn't currently be separately mapped. Otherwise data consumers cannot distingu... commented 2026-06-19 11:52:58 UTC by HellMap ♦927 |
| 153005941 (Comments: 1) | pyrog (Discussed changesets: 105) | n'existe plus à priori commented 2026-06-19 11:49:54 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦200 |
| 184305156 (Comments: 1) | wolfbert (Discussed changesets: 19) | danke! commented 2026-06-19 11:49:24 UTC by kuhni74 ♦459 |
| 184305368 (Comments: 1) | wolfbert (Discussed changesets: 19) | danke! commented 2026-06-19 11:48:59 UTC by kuhni74 ♦459 |
| 184308921 (Comments: 1) | Thomasje (Discussed changesets: 7) | Welkom bij OSM.. Bedankt voor je bijdragen. Let je er svp op om niet de adresinfo te verwijderen. Zo zijn adressen niet meer vindbaar. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-06-19 11:43:12 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184301502 (Comments: 1) | greenviewpresidentia (Discussed changesets: 2) | objects in OSM need a tag that indicates what the object is, sadly from my knowledge there is no tags for a "Sales Gallery" for residential development and thus should not be mapped. The crossing added in this changeset is also unlikely to ... commented 2026-06-19 11:33:47 UTC by Udarian ♦780 |
| 184180176 (Comments: 1) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 90) | Sveiki, Kā iepriekš minēts, ja elements jau ir iezīmēts kā punkts, bet tu zīmē laukumu, tad šis laukums ar punktu ir jāapvieno. Šeit piestātne jau bija iezīmēta ar https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3646335704 .... commented 2026-06-19 11:28:42 UTC by HellMap ♦927 |
| 184104405 (Comments: 2) | MatiMatix (Discussed changesets: 18) | okii, tak będę robić :3 commented 2026-06-19 11:18:16 UTC by MatiMatix ♦17 |
 | 182633198 (Comments: 1) | Heboyan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Heboyan djan! Unfortunately, your 2 sets of edits of the building at Paronyan street are not correct - you converted a building into amenity. If you want to add a barbershop, one of the possible methods is to create a point as POI (point of... commented 2026-06-19 11:13:19 UTC by Greg91 ♦27 |
| 184306347 (Comments: 1) | gombkez (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, Żabka, to po prostu sklep z funkcją fast_food - poprawiłem Twoją edycję: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184310681 commented 2026-06-19 11:11:21 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,070 |
| 183688184 (Comments: 1) | Heboyan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Heboyan djan! Unfortunately, your 2 sets of edits of the building at Paronyan street are not correct - you converted a building into amenity. If you want to add a barbershop, one of the possible methods is to create a point as POI (point of... commented 2026-06-19 11:11:04 UTC by Greg91 ♦27 |
| 184304706 (Comments: 2) | jengelh (Discussed changesets: 153) | the default behavior for barrier=gate does not seem specified, so the safe bet is to not rely on any particular behavior. commented 2026-06-19 11:05:26 UTC by jengelh ♦145 |
| 184301309 (Comments: 2) | greenviewpresidentia (Discussed changesets: 2) | as mentioned above the city of Miami still exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184310483 commented 2026-06-19 11:05:10 UTC by Udarian ♦780 |
| 183866049 (Comments: 4) | improperaffo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you. THis answer is exact that what I need. I sent an e-mail to the OSM inspector people for that they no more detect that error. BR and thanks Thomas commented 2026-06-19 11:01:45 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦40 |
| 184299587 (Comments: 1) | QASIMI_456 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Per favore, niente prove. Faccio revert. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184299587 commented 2026-06-19 10:57:49 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,531 |
| 183788627 (Comments: 6) | andrii_sudak (Discussed changesets: 1) | I asked, not corrected :) commented 2026-06-19 10:49:25 UTC by YomanNH ♦501 |
| 184253151 (Comments: 1) | fisherGZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | 有毒吧，别把 Ingress 的东西搬到这…… commented 2026-06-19 10:34:41 UTC by NanoApe ♦1 |
| 172138020 (Comments: 7) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 44) | thank you so much, getting in touch is far much better than those VIP mappers who had earlier removed some of my edits (via software) not because they were incorrect or mistake but they were at micro level...any how it was nice to have your feedback,... commented 2026-06-19 10:34:38 UTC by BholeKiBhasam ♦32 |
| 184304230 (Comments: 1) | Slacked3169 (Discussed changesets: 1) | layer=1 with no other tags isnt correct. If its shallow enough to cross a ford=yes node should be added commented 2026-06-19 10:28:35 UTC by Colbertson ♦160 |
| 184225470 (Comments: 1) | Wild351 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, You forgot to tag all these building. I've tagged them but please check the tags and see if I've missed any. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-06-19 10:15:57 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 184289657 (Comments: 1) | impact0r (Discussed changesets: 18) | Jeżeli zdjąłeś access=private to jaki sens jest dodania do tej drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299934986 foot=yes Podobnie tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382852313 dodanie access=yes jest bezcelowe ponieważ jeżeli nie ma ... commented 2026-06-19 10:13:11 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦665 |
| 101684667 (Comments: 2) | topius (Discussed changesets: 21) | Could very well be that it is Laterite, as it does exist in some parts of Papua New Guinea. Haven’t been in this area. Feel free to update it. commented 2026-06-19 09:49:59 UTC by topius ♦65 |
| 184271125 (Comments: 1) | karocre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap I see you're interested in adding MTB tracks in this area. If you are interested in really mapping these trails in as much detail as possible, then you might want to read the wiki page on MTB tagging. It... commented 2026-06-19 09:41:44 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,685 |
| 184305970 (Comments: 1) | Reinoudje (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 commented 2026-06-19 09:36:39 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184299694 (Comments: 2) | noе (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ich hab' das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184306281 korrigiert. commented 2026-06-19 09:25:49 UTC by habi ♦2,154 |
| 172530803 (Comments: 1) | noе (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Noe tourism=attraction ist hier wohl nicht ganz korrekt, wenn ich https://bergzyt.ch/impressum anschaue. Vielleicht eher https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dguide ? Gruss, Habi commented 2026-06-19 09:24:42 UTC by habi ♦2,154 |
| 184288636 (Comments: 3) | a-sav (Discussed changesets: 8) | No, this is fine! Big changesets (but still within one town/city) are fine as long as they’re all the same type of change (so are easy to check) :) Thanks for all the work you’ve put into Barrow recently, it’s really made a d... commented 2026-06-19 09:22:24 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,066 |
| 184275009 (Comments: 2) | clamemmel (Discussed changesets: 12) | Herzlichen Dank. Gerne kannst Du die Wege durch und um den Spielplatz nochmal abgehen, ob sie tatsächlich passen. Ich hatte mir eine separate Aufzeichnung gemacht, und 2 Wochen später hier gemappt. Insbes. nach Anschauen des Overlays mit de... commented 2026-06-19 09:10:26 UTC by clamemmel ♦9 |
| 184258200 (Comments: 2) | aibek55 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, the relation was fixed commented 2026-06-19 08:56:36 UTC by Elizen ♦78 |
| 183707794 (Comments: 2) | HKStreamOSM (Discussed changesets: 2) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184304235 commented 2026-06-19 08:37:59 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 183632535 (Comments: 10) | jengelh (Discussed changesets: 153) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184304177 commented 2026-06-19 08:36:46 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 183592620 (Comments: 5) | jengelh (Discussed changesets: 153) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184304177 commented 2026-06-19 08:36:38 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 184177990 (Comments: 3) | Andreas Hernandez (Discussed changesets: 3) | No, the 66kV line is gone. Pretty sure even the 22kV distribution line has been put in the ground as it runs in the same area. Have to wait for new imagery to update the area. Next scheduled aerials for this area is not until 2027. The remaining 6... commented 2026-06-19 08:24:01 UTC by Gazer75 ♦297 |
| 183295290 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 980) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184303559 commented 2026-06-19 08:22:27 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 184245246 (Comments: 3) | UPegasus (Discussed changesets: 13) | Дякую за пораду. commented 2026-06-19 08:17:38 UTC by UPegasus ♦46 |
| 180408581 (Comments: 3) | Dundee930 (Discussed changesets: 16) | I will take that as a yes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184303393 commented 2026-06-19 08:17:33 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 184272737 (Comments: 2) | Brukwa! (Discussed changesets: 1) | I checked these places again and changed to culverts. Thanks for feedback. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184272737 commented 2026-06-19 08:14:40 UTC by Brukwa! ♦1 |
| 183626949 (Comments: 3) | ptrider (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi. I have removed most stops in that route commented 2026-06-19 08:11:50 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦23 |
| 183375158 (Comments: 2) | xkillah (Discussed changesets: 12) | @yelisey90 thnx, fixed commented 2026-06-19 07:56:58 UTC by xkillah ♦83 |
| 184296004 (Comments: 1) | Potand (Discussed changesets: 2) | Korrekt wäre "Storz" statt "storz". Also großes "S". Bei den Größen wäre einfacher "B;C;C" statt "75;52;52". Ist jetzt nicht falsch aber in Österreich ist die Buchst... commented 2026-06-19 07:28:55 UTC by XimeX ♦93 |
| 184010532 (Comments: 3) | sbedwal_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 18) | Absolutely fair. My reason for thinking they are residential roads: https://sagecreek.qualicocommunities.com/lot-map/ https://data.winnipeg.ca/City-Planning/Map-of-Road-Network/2eba-wm4h Last time I visited the area there were no... commented 2026-06-19 07:28:23 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦70 |
| 184184993 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184300738 commented 2026-06-19 07:04:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184184953 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184300738 commented 2026-06-19 07:03:53 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 125725397 (Comments: 1) | berland (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hei, Ser ikke ut til at det er vanlig å tagge stier hvor det sykles som cycling tracks. Ser ut til at dette er forbeholdt der man sykler "on dedicated infrastructure", .f.eks. et innendørs anlegg eller en pumptrack. Jeg ... commented 2026-06-19 07:01:32 UTC by Oskarst_ ♦89 |
| 184184917 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reveted b 184300591 commented 2026-06-19 06:59:30 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184184894 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reveted b 184300591 commented 2026-06-19 06:59:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184184831 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reveted b 184300591 commented 2026-06-19 06:59:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183906 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184300372 commented 2026-06-19 06:53:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183859 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184300372 commented 2026-06-19 06:53:28 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184184774 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert by 184300032 commented 2026-06-19 06:46:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184184261 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert b 184299897 commented 2026-06-19 06:37:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183986 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Revert b 184299897 commented 2026-06-19 06:36:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184184486 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184299805 commented 2026-06-19 06:33:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 124193400 (Comments: 1) | Vathana11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | name:km should be "សង្កាត់ទឹកថ្លា" not "វត្តទឹកថ្លា" commented 2026-06-19 06:32:25 UTC by Katret2 ♦1 |
| 184183439 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184299642 commented 2026-06-19 06:31:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183308 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184299642 commented 2026-06-19 06:31:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183227 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184299642 commented 2026-06-19 06:30:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184157443 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted by 184299421 commented 2026-06-19 06:22:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
 | 184260834 (Comments: 1) | utux (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for your contribution. Could you please explain the source or local consensus for using the official long Russian name as the main name=* value here? commented 2026-06-19 06:18:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184214346 (Comments: 4) | DSW21F (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, das ist mir/uns schon klar. Die Ergänzung der Auswertung des Attributs "Entrance" macht für die Fahrplanauskunft insoweit keinen Sinn, dass dann jeder einzelne "Entrance" aus OSM dem Kunden angeboten wird. Dies... commented 2026-06-19 06:15:40 UTC by DSW21F ♦1 |
 | 184258725 (Comments: 1) | ikc1223 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #Spam ? commented 2026-06-19 06:14:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184270966 (Comments: 1) | WSacramento (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the added names real real? highway=crossing (13949744940) highway=crossing (13949744941) ... commented 2026-06-19 06:12:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184292926 (Comments: 1) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the name real? a (13950992571), v1 commented 2026-06-19 06:10:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 184291697 (Comments: 2) | lakedistrict (Discussed changesets: 59) | Thank you! I only spotted this in passing in a car, I hadn't been back for a proper survey. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184291697 commented 2026-06-19 05:55:16 UTC by iMacThere4iAm ♦13 |
| 184293203 (Comments: 1) | ThomvdH (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dag Thom.. Je bedoeling is goed. Realiseer je dat al die langsliggende trottoirs die je intekent niet correct routeren. Je zit er als het ware op gevangen. Probeer maar eens op een hoek over te steken. Die trottoirs worden meestal op... commented 2026-06-19 05:51:01 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 182421460 (Comments: 4) | sanjanasharma_lyft (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thank you for the clarification and for taking the time to visit the site and verify the current conditions. I also appreciate the explanation regarding the preferred handling of temporary construction activities in OSM. Your point about using con... commented 2026-06-19 05:47:11 UTC by sanjanasharma_lyft ♦12 |
| 184290997 (Comments: 2) | Pieter Jan van Hall (Discussed changesets: 1) | De naam heb ik aangepast. In zo'n geval zoek je in alle regels de sleutel name= op en vervangt de waarde in de nieuwe naam. commented 2026-06-19 05:45:09 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184269394 (Comments: 1) | LucHoeben77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-19 05:41:48 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184266599 (Comments: 1) | sycamore034 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-06-19 05:41:01 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184217285 (Comments: 1) | Krzysztof Buchacz (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-06-19 04:25:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184206983 (Comments: 1) | 154pinkchairs (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-06-19 03:52:35 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 159724504 (Comments: 1) | eversone (Discussed changesets: 55) | Why did you make the entire runway `runway=displaced_threshold`? commented 2026-06-19 03:49:41 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 184201667 (Comments: 1) | NJarek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-06-19 03:13:37 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184202559 (Comments: 1) | pthiker (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-06-19 03:13:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184202483 (Comments: 1) | pthiker (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-06-19 03:13:27 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184198415 (Comments: 1) | medical-space (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-06-19 03:13:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184198664 (Comments: 1) | Rbrt7 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2026-06-19 03:13:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184290446 (Comments: 1) | 6totheworld (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, You have changed *a lot* of road classifications that have been stable for a long time, without talking to anyone. Can you please explain the changes, what sort of "live navigation algorithmic deficiencies" you believe are hap... commented 2026-06-19 02:57:46 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦388 |
| 184182868 (Comments: 1) | Bąbel (Discussed changesets: 284) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895945528 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2026-06-19 02:53:40 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184177413 (Comments: 1) | natalias_gf (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-06-19 02:53:36 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184177794 (Comments: 1) | natalias_gf (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2026-06-19 02:53:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 184182354 (Comments: 1) | suleckiborek (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2026-06-19 02:53:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦8,765 |
| 172918476 (Comments: 4) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 77) | Hello Aline, thanks for the response! I can start to understand why you have been making those concerning map edits. It's common for new OSM mappers to make some mistakes, and seeing that you're new to OSM, new mappers will not be blocked j... commented 2026-06-19 02:41:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦197 |
| 182858744 (Comments: 2) | Rivai Sigit (Discussed changesets: 5) | harusnya Jalan Lingkar Luar Puspiptek\t commented 2026-06-19 02:20:37 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184183695 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294516 commented 2026-06-19 01:46:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183626 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294516 commented 2026-06-19 01:46:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183542 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294516 commented 2026-06-19 01:46:03 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184182234 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184182310 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184182499 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184182748 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184182861 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183016 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184183132 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:51 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184182123 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184181967 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294326 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184271017 (Comments: 1) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 11) | Siehe Hinweis #5139564 commented 2026-06-19 01:32:27 UTC by RandomThighsEnjoyer ♦10 |
| 184254475 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 268) | Sincerely appreciate your help! commented 2026-06-19 01:26:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 184140788 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184156604 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184143183 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184140444 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184139036 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183257275 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183084592 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 184137489 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183257459 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 183257582 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181583180 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181463527 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181463261 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 182805441 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181869504 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181464418 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181462759 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181460550 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181460888 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181463155 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181463113 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181462402 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181235783 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181376027 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 181250555 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100 commented 2026-06-19 01:18:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,123 |
| 180790829 (Comments: 7) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | Oh, okay then. I'll be more careful from here on out. commented 2026-06-19 00:34:25 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
| 184249803 (Comments: 1) | eastratcha (Discussed changesets: 1) | this is why Jesus does not come back. commented 2026-06-18 23:58:12 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦8 |
| 178904984 (Comments: 1) | Erlinda Nasywa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mohon dalam memetakannya, jangan diberi nama dari nama pemeta di tag name=* commented 2026-06-18 23:57:06 UTC by FajrAl ♦458 |
| 183988967 (Comments: 1) | krmatthews (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the update! I was actually going to go survey the progress of this today, so you've saved me the trip! commented 2026-06-18 23:56:02 UTC by nyanpsyche ♦18 |
| 183896352 (Comments: 8) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | @Kai_Johnson okay, I'll leave this area alone for now. commented 2026-06-18 23:52:59 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
| 183922120 (Comments: 8) | NE2 (Discussed changesets: 15) | I also agree with highway=motorway, but I didn't want to revert and potentially start an edit war. commented 2026-06-18 23:24:20 UTC by NE2 ♦13 |
| 183741105 (Comments: 5) | CoryS89 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for helping clarify, Mihn. commented 2026-06-18 23:12:39 UTC by CoryS89 ♦15 |
| 184069341 (Comments: 2) | HammyCheesy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Makes sense, thank you! commented 2026-06-18 22:59:20 UTC by HammyCheesy ♦1 |
| 184286063 (Comments: 3) | Langestreet (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sounds like you want landuse=meadow. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow commented 2026-06-18 22:51:14 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 184278155 (Comments: 1) | emnem (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey emnem, just FYI the format of phone=* is invalid here (it should be +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN for NANP, although +1 NNN-NNN-NNNN and +1 NNN NNN NNNN will also work on a fallback basis. The confusedbuffalo bot *should* come around and fix it within 24-48 ho... commented 2026-06-18 22:48:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦252 |
| 184131181 (Comments: 2) | ajulien (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonsoir, merci de m'avertir. Je pense que j'ai du me louper avec l'autocomplétion, et vouloir mettre "layer" -> "-1", comme le banc d'à côté (pour montrer qu'ils sont sous le ... commented 2026-06-18 22:37:33 UTC by ajulien ♦6 |
| 184285322 (Comments: 2) | Langestreet (Discussed changesets: 3) | That change would also be fine. The "House" on the left is not a house, but a commercial workshop. commented 2026-06-18 22:13:26 UTC by Langestreet ♦2 |
| 184291301 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck_repair (Discussed changesets: 3898) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 183896352. commented 2026-06-18 22:08:23 UTC by woodpeck_repair ♦37,355 |
| 182109421 (Comments: 1) | RThomps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo RThomps, Du schreibst "Eine Straße ist nicht passierbar, da sie durch ein Privatgrundstück geht (Metzingen)". Das heißt, für den Grundstücksbesitzer ist der Weg passierbar? Dann wär... commented 2026-06-18 22:01:25 UTC by Metzor ♦408 |
| 184252541 (Comments: 1) | Langestreet (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184252541 commented 2026-06-18 21:55:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 184245975 (Comments: 1) | Mike Ronesia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Note: we don't add personal information to OSM. Can you remove "Gary's Drive" is the way isn't actually named that? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18424... commented 2026-06-18 21:53:25 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 184241315 (Comments: 1) | TorchyTess (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the house number correct? They usually don't have words in them. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184241315 commented 2026-06-18 21:50:47 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 184235524 (Comments: 1) | JMPRa (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square bldgs by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184235524 commented 2026-06-18 21:46:33 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 184230098 (Comments: 1) | Boomgaarden (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this the correct name for a taxiway? I usually see names like "A" or "F". --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184230098 commented 2026-06-18 21:45:15 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
 | 184237009 (Comments: 1) | SeverinGeo (Discussed changesets: 19) | legal! Já testando o tm ;) commented 2026-06-18 21:43:24 UTC by Raquel Dezidério Souto ♦22 |
| 179729330 (Comments: 1) | Anh 3 Tiger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant promotion and nonsensical tagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184290774 commented 2026-06-18 21:40:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 167481782 (Comments: 1) | Ignacio36 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Se modificó el nombre de la Calle Brasil por Santos Serfaty, segun ORDENANZA 672 publicada en boletin oficial de fecha 18/07/2024. https://www.boletindigital.misiones.gov.ar/boletines/16156%20firmado.pdf commented 2026-06-18 21:32:44 UTC by Diego Krein ♦44 |
| 184289370 (Comments: 1) | ntableman (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/fparsimages/apps804/fp2819804/fp2819804.pdf I drove these yesterday, will adjust as I can commented 2026-06-18 21:30:34 UTC by ntableman ♦1 |
| 180507133 (Comments: 1) | stosh77 (Discussed changesets: 62) | Revised. commented 2026-06-18 21:28:18 UTC by stosh77 ♦66 |
| 184201376 (Comments: 3) | rubu3000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, vielen Dank für die Antwort. Es sind also "offizielle Namen". Offizielle Namen für das Fusion-Festival oder können diese Namen auch in einer offiziellen Karte oder Register von Rechlin oder einer anderen... commented 2026-06-18 21:28:14 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,694 |
| 183928968 (Comments: 1) | Vaidotas (Discussed changesets: 26) | Mano klaida, ačiū, kad tai ištaisėte! commented 2026-06-18 21:22:54 UTC by Cotep4 ♦11 |
| 184100317 (Comments: 1) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello GabiruX_, I came across your recent changesets https://osmcha.org/changesets/184091039 and https://osmcha.org/changesets/184033097 and noticed several highway classification changes in this area that may not fully align with OSM highway ... commented 2026-06-18 21:13:56 UTC by Haritron ♦14 |
| 184136445 (Comments: 3) | bknavyyard (Discussed changesets: 5) | I see what you mean that those 2 sections are not connected. As such I split them. commented 2026-06-18 21:12:33 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,547 |
| 184269455 (Comments: 1) | Eismann420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Eismann, willkommen bei OSM und danke für das Ergänzen des fehlenden Pfades. Um diesen klar von den offiziellen MTB Trails und zugelassenen Wegen abzugrenzen, weirden auf solchen Wegen keine MTB-Scales vergeben. commented 2026-06-18 21:12:32 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,436 |
| 184178114 (Comments: 1) | Andreas Hernandez (Discussed changesets: 3) | That line has not existed for about a decade at this point. Part of the old 66kV line was used as 22kV for a few years before they tore down most of it and rebuilt with smaller poles. Only remnants of the old is the part west of Ålfoten substat... commented 2026-06-18 21:01:00 UTC by Gazer75 ♦297 |
| 152096824 (Comments: 2) | MonsterKlaus (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hallo Uwe. Da hast du recht. Ich habe das geändert. Grüße von Klaus commented 2026-06-18 20:58:05 UTC by MonsterKlaus ♦18 |
 | 184158560 (Comments: 1) | Dannyoung (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey, I noticed that the tag 7=8 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13831092957 looks like a mistake since that is the first use of that key (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/7). commented 2026-06-18 20:42:05 UTC by isotopicemoting ♦14 |
| 183092361 (Comments: 3) | AnthonyG3124 (Discussed changesets: 4) | That's what the key fut_ref=* is for. From what I remember, adding "Future I-11" to a way's ref=* tag is ONLY for when a "Future Interstate Highway" sign is present. Even for the opposite end of Future I-11 in Arizona, a... commented 2026-06-18 20:41:16 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
| 184250463 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | I see. I tried to demarcate the postal code boundaries, but I ran into issues north of I-15. commented 2026-06-18 20:39:16 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
| 184234946 (Comments: 2) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hi isotopicemoting, thanks for the hint. You are right. Fixed. Greetings, lyctkel commented 2026-06-18 20:36:35 UTC by lyctkel ♦374 |
| 184288719 (Comments: 1) | Hendrik Helsper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hier die Wiki-Seite zu dem Thema (für highways, aber analog auf andere proposed-features anwendbar): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=proposed?uselang=de Außerdem die Diskussion im Forum (erster Post zu dem Thema a... commented 2026-06-18 20:31:49 UTC by Hendrik Helsper ♦22 |
| 180198015 (Comments: 2) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 129) | Ano, este je to vacsinou zarastene. Neviem presne kde sa uz stavia, nie su fotky. commented 2026-06-18 20:31:14 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,941 |
| X | 184172049 (Comments: 4) | SirNumbers (Discussed changesets: 1) | update: i am now confused on how to sort on my city since theres a lot doing stuff like this. ignore previous req commented 2026-06-18 20:22:47 UTC by TobichiiSama ♦1 |
| 182417994 (Comments: 1) | MustafaOyunda155 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Merhaba, yapmış olduğunuz değişiklik kaydı hakkında size ulaşıyorum. Plan veya inşaat halindeki platformları ve istasyonları normal istasyon etiketleri ile etiketlememelisiniz. Bu tarz objeler için "proposed" etike... commented 2026-06-18 20:16:19 UTC by EMREOYUN ♦63 |
| 184220576 (Comments: 1) | CrysMelyn (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hey, I noticed that the key ":access" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530326447 looks like a typo but didn't want to just change it to "access" in case you meant something more specific. commented 2026-06-18 20:14:04 UTC by isotopicemoting ♦14 |
| 184245310 (Comments: 4) | Русский Человек (Discussed changesets: 11) | Я вернул названия ещё несколько часов назад, как ты и просил. Лучше за своими шавками следи, чтобы не занимались вандализмом и провокация... commented 2026-06-18 20:09:38 UTC by Русский Человек ♦3 |
| 183866579 (Comments: 2) | itineris (Discussed changesets: 74) | Valóban van egy kávégépük. :) Ugyanakkor meleg ételeket is készítettek. A kiírás szerint "Próbaüzem" ment. commented 2026-06-18 19:50:06 UTC by itineris ♦423 |
| 184279789 (Comments: 1) | Potand (Discussed changesets: 2) | Du kannst die Kupplungsgrößen als eigenen Tag setzen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:couplings:diameters Und auch gleich den Kupplungstyp: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:couplings:type Ist bei uns in Öste... commented 2026-06-18 19:42:51 UTC by XimeX ♦93 |
| 184151060 (Comments: 2) | Ctown1875 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also, please add a meaningful changeset comment describing your changes. For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-06-18 19:39:38 UTC by Xvtn ♦495 |
| 184280872 (Comments: 1) | SCJiang (Discussed changesets: 1) | 请直接将范围添加至 relation/6590167 关系内 commented 2026-06-18 19:38:49 UTC by 蕉饼电脑 ♦58 |
| 184262558 (Comments: 2) | Fiszi37 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Dane wprowadzam na podstawie wewnętrznych analiz sieciowych i wytycznych projektowych. Jeśli uważasz, że te restrykcje są tam zbędne, śmiało możesz je usunąć/zrewertować według własnego uznania. commented 2026-06-18 19:32:08 UTC by Fiszi37 ♦14 |
| 183319096 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 980) | Thanks! I should have known better... commented 2026-06-18 19:26:59 UTC by wolfbert ♦178 |
| 183271001 (Comments: 4) | wolfbert (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ach ja, VOGIS, oben stehts ja. Liegt wahrscheinlich daran, dass die alten Bilder in JOSM im Menü stehen, während man die neuen eine Ebene tiefer auswählen muss. commented 2026-06-18 19:18:35 UTC by wolfbert ♦178 |
| 166928267 (Comments: 1) | Waldstreife (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Waldstreife, das Luftbild das für diesen Änderungssatz verwendet hast war offensichtlich veraltet. Würdest du bitte diesen Änderungssatz 166928267 zurück setzen, damit die neuen Masten und die neue Leitung wieder ric... commented 2026-06-18 18:55:46 UTC by blauloke ♦11 |
| 183275872 (Comments: 5) | Marcus-K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted mit Changeset 184285884. commented 2026-06-18 18:53:41 UTC by Marcus-K ♦1 |
| 184285538 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 60) | The restriction was preventing a left turn from southbound Cedar Lane to Simpson Mill Drive, but Esri World Imagery shows a turn lane and Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=575778145056265) shows no evidence of a turn restriction. The re... commented 2026-06-18 18:49:06 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦80 |
| 148416106 (Comments: 1) | trapicki (Discussed changesets: 21) | Was bedeutet addr:no=130 bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11707994936? Ist das nicht eine ganz normale Hausnummer? commented 2026-06-18 18:48:21 UTC by wolfbert ♦178 |
| 163454943 (Comments: 2) | rempshaener (Discussed changesets: 48) | angepasst commented 2026-06-18 18:43:18 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 163331978 (Comments: 1) | santioviedo08 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. En este changeset hay nodos que corresponden a cruces peatonales con `addr:housenumber=0`, lo cual la comunidad OSM Argentina considera incorrecto. Este es un changeset de ejemplo, pero encontramos otros con las mismas característica... commented 2026-06-18 18:31:01 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦21 |
| 184274226 (Comments: 3) | BigRedPie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Genial!!! gracias por la rapidez y la ayuda en reducir ruido de la base de datos :D un placer así. Que tengas un feliz mapeo! commented 2026-06-18 18:30:13 UTC by aTarom ♦957 |
| 166088815 (Comments: 1) | heilbron (Discussed changesets: 44) | Was hat es denn mit addr:streetname auf sich? Der Straßenname steht i.A. in addr:street. commented 2026-06-18 18:23:47 UTC by wolfbert ♦178 |
| 184263624 (Comments: 1) | Thotti (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Das sieht gut aus, keine Anmerkungen. Viele Grüße commented 2026-06-18 18:22:47 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,541 |
| 116380957 (Comments: 2) | secmap (Discussed changesets: 1) | durch das Übertragen aus alten Kartenblättern stehen solche Flurnamen in der basemap oft mehrfach an unterschiedlichen Positionen (beim südlichen muss man weiter hineinscrollen, bis er sichtbar wird) commented 2026-06-18 18:07:26 UTC by Luzandro ♦1,005 |
| 184179981 (Comments: 6) | Ra_colate (Discussed changesets: 15) | no worries! i really appreciate all the work you have done, and do! your group does amazing work! commented 2026-06-18 18:04:27 UTC by icarus72180 ♦1 |
| 173702483 (Comments: 1) | feinsiedler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nicht alle Straßen haben tatsächlich Namen, z.B. Untertösens oder Madatschen. tirisMaps unterscheidet das im Gegensatz zur basemap recht gut. commented 2026-06-18 18:03:00 UTC by wolfbert ♦178 |
| 184283702 (Comments: 1) | Altts (Discussed changesets: 6) | Correction: the imagery source used was Esri World Imagery commented 2026-06-18 18:01:19 UTC by Altts ♦6 |
| 184247886 (Comments: 1) | Rubenke (Discussed changesets: 76) | Zie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20845 commented 2026-06-18 17:58:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,685 |
| 182984298 (Comments: 2) | MountMapper (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi FroschForscher, thank you for making the corrections and for your time to reach out to me. I am better aware of living street properties now. commented 2026-06-18 17:56:21 UTC by MountMapper ♦1 |
| 183314085 (Comments: 3) | tcarlisle (Discussed changesets: 34) | oh, that's good to know! I hadn't figured to look at the proposed Brighton map, but interesting that they're going to incorporate our unsanctioned trail into their trails (I guess it only makes sense). We put up a trail sign last year... commented 2026-06-18 17:45:43 UTC by 361degrees ♦1 |
| 184198729 (Comments: 2) | Aroru (Discussed changesets: 8) | di versi sebelumnya main road sudah di tag highway=construction tapi trase nya kurang akurat. Menurut aerial imagery yang ada tanda2 konstruksi baru di junction sleman, sisanya kurang tahu commented 2026-06-18 17:44:33 UTC by Aroru ♦5 |
| 184281330 (Comments: 2) | Jaksza (Discussed changesets: 10) | Racja. Zasugerowałem się końcem podziału pasów i spowalniaczami za znakiem miejscowości, ale dociągnięcie do pętli autobusowej ma zdecydowanie większy sens. Zaraz to poprawię, dzięki. commented 2026-06-18 17:30:12 UTC by Jaksza ♦4 |
| 183648837 (Comments: 3) | TommyRobloxOfficial (Discussed changesets: 20) | nie oznaczaj proszę w taki sposób stacji które już nie istnieją, to jest informacja wprowadzająca w błąd commented 2026-06-18 17:29:04 UTC by geo-mal ♦15 |
| 181039045 (Comments: 1) | lolokiii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, In regards to this edit, you added two buildings which had since been demolished and , but which were showing up on the map at the time. This is not a major issue since there was nothing on those structures, however I just wanted to let you... commented 2026-06-18 17:20:31 UTC by Ktr101 ♦31 |
| 157633094 (Comments: 3) | KSm8nFbfXjqAzdFDUfH6sJsczVEYNEhRNdnaSnWPCfDOLvp129G2eFbkYQaVVnTM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Podrías revertirlo, es lo que ha pasado, perdona por la molestia. commented 2026-06-18 17:17:06 UTC by KSm8nFbfXjqAzdFDUfH6sJsczVEYNEhRNdnaSnWPCfDOLvp129G2eFbkYQaVVnTM ♦1 |
| 184253210 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | (responded) commented 2026-06-18 17:11:43 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦279 |
| 133669939 (Comments: 1) | Markt Holzkirchen (Discussed changesets: 6) | Warum wurde hier im traffic_sign das 1026-36 entfernt? Darf landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr hier nicht mehr fahren? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28150106 commented 2026-06-18 17:11:09 UTC by Geo-Tobi ♦311 |
| 144241163 (Comments: 3) | Русский Человек (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, Chriss! Sorry for the delay in replying: I don't come here very often, and the comments aren't displaying clearly. This is quite an interesting topic. I'd be happy to add any alternative names for this country, such as Cisdn... commented 2026-06-18 17:09:22 UTC by Русский Человек ♦3 |
| 184279774 (Comments: 1) | ablutd2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Witaj. Wieś Polanka Hallera dalej istnieje; Twoją zmianę wycofałem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184281075). Przeczytaj proszę mój komentarz pod jednym z Twoich poprzednich zestawów (https://www.openstreetmap.org/c... commented 2026-06-18 17:03:58 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦101 |
| 184114344 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 245) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/reviewing-recent-changes-by-flap-slimy-outward/144716 commented 2026-06-18 17:00:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184201595 (Comments: 6) | OpenStreetGoober (Discussed changesets: 1) | Have a nice day! One reconstruction ends - it would be nice to switch road back to the active state. If you have any other difficulties then feel free to ask at the official forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ! (I fo... commented 2026-06-18 16:57:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184279702 (Comments: 1) | Robins_Egg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Robins, looks like this was probably a test of the deflock app. Could you confirm and delete the camera? Changes are pushed pretty quickly to the live map, so it's a totally understandable mistake. Also just an FYI if you do spot any unmapped... commented 2026-06-18 16:43:59 UTC by HashFerret ♦18 |
| 184278648 (Comments: 1) | ablutd2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Witaj! Twoje zmiany, z których najważniejsze dotyczą infrastruktury kolejowej w Krzęcinie, to oczywista fikcja, w związku z czym je wycofałem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184279510). Jeżeli masz chęć malowania po mapie,... commented 2026-06-18 16:31:11 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦101 |
| 184199750 (Comments: 2) | Michael Spitzenberger (Discussed changesets: 209) | Hallo Toni, danke für den Hinweis, Ich habe die Wege entsprechend angepasst. Wegen dem way 15301995810 da ist die Zugangsbeschränkung wohl erst ab der Einmündung commented 2026-06-18 16:19:06 UTC by Michael Spitzenberger ♦10 |
| 184137983 (Comments: 2) | Kri_ttt (Discussed changesets: 41) | I'm so sorry about that. Now that I researched about it, it is really a full-fledged gym. commented 2026-06-18 16:18:14 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦26 |
| 184181168 (Comments: 2) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 339) | Shoot, sorry. I encounter townland lines drawn on the road when they should be beside a bit. And I guess that when I try to fix it, I break the relations. commented 2026-06-18 16:14:55 UTC by b-unicycling ♦291 |
| 183751483 (Comments: 2) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 339) | There were overlapping buildings, hopefully it is better now commented 2026-06-18 16:13:41 UTC by b-unicycling ♦291 |
| 184226722 (Comments: 1) | SafireKitten (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Street names need to be spelled out. The reason is software has a hard time with abbreviations. Can you fix this and the previous edit to the landuse? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... commented 2026-06-18 16:01:46 UTC by Glassman ♦5,992 |
| 181783125 (Comments: 1) | angelomh13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This placement is incorrect. The correct placement of the camera is already at node 12368432394. In this location is a red light camera. commented 2026-06-18 15:45:47 UTC by GilesWells ♦1 |
| 184144028 (Comments: 2) | WHS Contributor (Discussed changesets: 4) | Good catch, yeah. commented 2026-06-18 15:19:40 UTC by WHS Contributor ♦2 |
| 184256048 (Comments: 2) | birimkulova (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thank you for the comment, I’ve corrected it. Thanks! commented 2026-06-18 14:57:20 UTC by birimkulova ♦12 |
| 172934850 (Comments: 2) | VLD277 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thank you for the feedback. Happy Mapping! commented 2026-06-18 14:55:28 UTC by VLD277 ♦21 |
| 183644838 (Comments: 2) | Disco4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da keine Reaktion: revert mit Change 184275476 commented 2026-06-18 14:53:02 UTC by JochenOSM ♦132 |
| 184223980 (Comments: 2) | HyperFlint (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi and thanks for this notice! It was just a typo, I'll fix it as fast as possible commented 2026-06-18 14:52:54 UTC by HyperFlint ♦7 |
| 184275484 (Comments: 1) | literan (Discussed changesets: 205) | извиняюсь, нечаянно точку в Москве подвинул commented 2026-06-18 14:52:38 UTC by literan ♦7,145 |
| 165865525 (Comments: 3) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 161) | The remaining not:natural=wood are large multi-crown standalone trees which are easily mistaken for a forest/wood / multiple trees if solely based of aerial imagery. I'll personally keep them for now, though they exist in many places. However, f... commented 2026-06-18 14:51:54 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦721 |
| 184245568 (Comments: 1) | tayqu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! commented 2026-06-18 14:51:16 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,858 |
| 184243514 (Comments: 1) | yelisey90 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thank you for the correction. commented 2026-06-18 14:46:47 UTC by birimkulova ♦12 |
| 184242972 (Comments: 1) | yelisey90 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thank you for the correction. commented 2026-06-18 14:45:22 UTC by birimkulova ♦12 |
| 184242875 (Comments: 1) | yelisey90 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thank you for the correction. commented 2026-06-18 14:43:54 UTC by birimkulova ♦12 |
| 182016576 (Comments: 1) | NFZANMNIM (Discussed changesets: 154) | Can i ask qustion? commented 2026-06-18 14:40:25 UTC by Ali Abbas mohamed ♦1 |
| 184230661 (Comments: 2) | birimkulova (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello, thank you for the comment. I have fixed it. commented 2026-06-18 14:39:40 UTC by birimkulova ♦12 |
| 159636756 (Comments: 3) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 161) | The only noteable thing here is they support showing cars actually driving on the left since about a month https://core.f4map.com/changelog (the above may not contain all changes) A derived list of supported tags is at https://taginfo... commented 2026-06-18 14:37:58 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦721 |
| 183947301 (Comments: 5) | MrAnderson (Discussed changesets: 5) | Das zuletzt war der Wegweiser in der Nagolder Straße. Das hier ist der in der Mühlstraße: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1352895808681787&focus=photo&lat=48.596250385705&lng=8.8610156081077&z=17&x=0.76... commented 2026-06-18 14:37:11 UTC by MrAnderson ♦5 |
| 184270734 (Comments: 1) | Mex (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks! commented 2026-06-18 14:36:09 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,858 |
| 179894308 (Comments: 2) | Kri_ttt (Discussed changesets: 41) | I was just adding 'name:etymology:wikidata' tag to roadways (for the https://bangkok.equalstreetnames.org/). All of the wanings were already existed, But I didn't have time to fix it all at that time. commented 2026-06-18 14:29:03 UTC by Kri_ttt ♦26 |
| 184233336 (Comments: 1) | Emetas Semaška (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Emetas, Great job and fine contribution but just one thing to look at. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530393136 Because navigation does not allow for jumping from path to path (be it a street or a path) this looks great but isn�... commented 2026-06-18 14:28:08 UTC by dzidek23 ♦87 |
| 176680211 (Comments: 1) | loremipsum-ill (Discussed changesets: 1) | What is best practice when a designated biking street on the map does not reflect real-world conditions as what is the safest route? Glenview Road from Shermer to Harlem is a somewhat busy road with no bike infrastructure other than sidewalks, wherea... commented 2026-06-18 14:23:17 UTC by muhlemann ♦2 |
| 161807930 (Comments: 1) | heiman191 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Why did you delete a seamark and a survey point? commented 2026-06-18 14:21:52 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 183621257 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Revert (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks; happy mapping commented 2026-06-18 14:18:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184231343 (Comments: 2) | raelianer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Jetzt werden die Poller nicht mehr so angezeigt, wie sie dort vor Ort positioniert sind? Soll das so sein? commented 2026-06-18 14:15:13 UTC by raelianer ♦1 |
| 128870644 (Comments: 1) | adreamy (Discussed changesets: 14) | 아니 왜? 이런 식으로 편집하지 마시죠. 이 동네 살던 때 한참동안 산책하면서 모아 놓은 걸 제출한 건데 왜 몇년뒤에 아무 말도 없이 롤백하죠? commented 2026-06-18 14:14:22 UTC by ChangwooRyu ♦20 |
| 184268790 (Comments: 1) | nordiq_jve (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2026-06-18 14:14:09 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,852 |
| 184186805 (Comments: 2) | Sub_Zero2708 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Deleted objects restored https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184273527 commented 2026-06-18 14:09:51 UTC by JezCrow ♦177 |
| 183720546 (Comments: 1) | JB4D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi - can you please provide some context to these tag changes? Storm King Art Center has many of the characteristics that meet the definition of leisure=park, tourism=museum and museum=art. Seems unnecessary to have removed these tags. https://wik... commented 2026-06-18 14:08:27 UTC by bhietsch ♦70 |
| 148967498 (Comments: 2) | BrieQ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merged it with the building in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184273398 commented 2026-06-18 14:07:36 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦721 |
| 184040714 (Comments: 2) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 27) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184273391 commented 2026-06-18 14:07:21 UTC by kingkingHK ♦388 |
| 184243087 (Comments: 3) | Alikam (Discussed changesets: 21) | Bir de O-1 otoyolunun Boğaziçi köprüsü dışındaki kısımları kavşak noktalarındaki tabelalarda bölünmüş yol olarak gözüküyor ve bisiklet vb. araçlara yasaklı görünmüyo... commented 2026-06-18 13:55:33 UTC by yitimox ♦26 |
| 184261806 (Comments: 1) | knigma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The correct tags would be building=house house=detached rather than building=detached. I've made the changes. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-06-18 13:31:07 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,225 |
| 184268792 (Comments: 1) | Aliaksandr_Heraskou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Restriction "only_right_turn" was added based on Bing Streetside commented 2026-06-18 13:30:59 UTC by Aliaksandr_Heraskou ♦2 |
| 184271621 (Comments: 1) | arafqus (Discussed changesets: 17) | beach and added beach resort) commented 2026-06-18 13:25:35 UTC by arafqus ♦15 |
| 184235277 (Comments: 4) | NasuFoito (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://tyumn.ru/raiony/rajon-lesobaza-v-tyumeni https://tumen.ginfo.ru/ulicy/?okrug=41&rayon=493 commented 2026-06-18 13:19:54 UTC by NasuFoito ♦12 |
| 184266671 (Comments: 2) | metaphil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Arbeitskollegin ist Anwohnerin und schreibt: „Die Schranken sind sehr nah am Fahrbahnrand, Fussgänger können über den kleinen Fussweg gehen, Fahrradfahrer können das Rad auch über den Fussweg schieben.“ access ... commented 2026-06-18 13:17:42 UTC by metaphil ♦1 |
| 156270498 (Comments: 3) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 161) | Excellent. commented 2026-06-18 13:17:14 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,168 |
| 184259899 (Comments: 1) | kasztelan111 (Discussed changesets: 117) | Jak się zmienia adres, to poprzedni wrzucamy w old_addr:street=* i old_addr:housenumber=* Jest to dośc istotne, bo poprzedni adres wciąż może być używany. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:old_addr:housenumber commented 2026-06-18 13:15:51 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184258522 (Comments: 1) | g_hinrichs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Das nächste Mal bitte mit Änderungssatzkommentar. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184258522 commented 2026-06-18 13:09:29 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,229 |
| 181724473 (Comments: 1) | nwz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, du hast an diesem Way ein verbot für den Fußverkehr getagged. Woran machst du das Verbot fest? In den letzten 6 Jahren hing da kein Verbotszeichen... Hängt dort jetzt eines? commented 2026-06-18 13:09:11 UTC by SurlyRider ♦15 |
| 183456092 (Comments: 2) | wermak (Discussed changesets: 195) | Adresse entfernt. Danke. commented 2026-06-18 13:08:48 UTC by wermak ♦135 |
| 184257234 (Comments: 1) | Fiszi37 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Tutaj tak samo. Nie widzę powodu do dodawania zakazów zawracania, bo są przerywane linie. commented 2026-06-18 13:08:24 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184262156 (Comments: 1) | Fiszi37 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Inne relacje też należałoby uwzględnić i poprawić, teraz linia L-4 ma uszkodzony przebieg. commented 2026-06-18 13:03:05 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184262359 (Comments: 1) | Fiszi37 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Dlaczego dodajesz zakaz zawracania np. tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20998723 skoro jest takie zawracanie możliwe? Malo kto raczej by je robił, bo po co, ale nie ma tutaj linii ciągłej, która by to zabran... commented 2026-06-18 13:00:41 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184264793 (Comments: 1) | Fiszi37 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Dlaczego został dodany zakaz zawracania w miejscu, gdzie nawet jest sygnalizacja dedykowana do zawracania? Czym są te dane yanosika i w jaki sposób je weryfikujesz? commented 2026-06-18 12:55:06 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,339 |
| 184268328 (Comments: 2) | Nondaco (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.instagram.com/tutteefrutteecoffee/ …Webpage will be updated soon! commented 2026-06-18 12:49:49 UTC by Nondaco ♦1 |
| 25123697 (Comments: 1) | Draktor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Prosim, nelepit landuse na cesty (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300969388), neda sa s nimi potom pracovat. Dik. commented 2026-06-18 12:37:42 UTC by Tomas_J ♦380 |
| 184258836 (Comments: 4) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 441) | Ran that tweak in FireFox which is non-chrome based. Got a toolbar icon which currently tells me I need to sign in to get the trace overlay. commented 2026-06-18 12:30:23 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,507 |
| 184264370 (Comments: 1) | Ram Ezrah (Discussed changesets: 4) | היי, במסוף החדש כבר מופיעות תחנות האוטובוס החדשות. מבחינת המיפוי, זו תחנת אוטובוס חדשה עם מספר חדש (2206, לעומת 35335 של התחנה במיקום הישן). אני ... commented 2026-06-18 12:02:02 UTC by NeatNit ♦80 |
| 184196381 (Comments: 4) | María Luz Rivoira (Discussed changesets: 2) | Buenísimo, lo modifico commented 2026-06-18 11:59:31 UTC by María Luz Rivoira ♦1 |
| 184197105 (Comments: 2) | Astucki (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Astucki Genau wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184263458 bemerkt, ist diese Namens-Änderung bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6537087519 nicht der richtige Weg, um festzuhalten, dass dies ein Privatweg ist. Gruss,<... commented 2026-06-18 11:33:00 UTC by habi ♦2,154 |
| 184197621 (Comments: 2) | Astucki (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hier hab' ich alles ob dem Brawandsteg mit `access=private` versehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184266889 commented 2026-06-18 11:26:41 UTC by habi ♦2,154 |
| 181507550 (Comments: 1) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 185) | Hej, Jeg kan se at vådområdet følger kystlinjen, men faktisk er der jo en klint yderst på knuden, og en smal strand vejen rundt. Er det muligt at afkoble vådområdet fra kystlinjen, og lade det følge i... commented 2026-06-18 11:19:14 UTC by Anders L ♦9 |
| 184263458 (Comments: 1) | Astucki (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Astucki Der Name bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6537087519 ist ziemlich sicher falsch. Zugangsbeschränkungen werden in OpenStreetMap mit den passenden `access`-Werten nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access erfa... commented 2026-06-18 11:11:11 UTC by habi ♦2,154 |
| 184227656 (Comments: 1) | Leadville ATV Tours (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant promotion and nonsensical tagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184266201 commented 2026-06-18 11:08:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183580721 (Comments: 1) | TymZ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, bitte verbinde kreuzende Wege mit einem Schnittpunkt und die Enden von separat erfassten Gehsteigen mit der Fahrbahn, ansonsten sind die Wege für das Routing unbrauchbar. Zumindest für ersteres hat auch der iD-Editor vo... commented 2026-06-18 11:03:21 UTC by Luzandro ♦1,005 |
 | 183534135 (Comments: 1) | JFL-75 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Very accurate in general. Please take a look to this mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513918987/history#map=19/15.466897/32.542762 You mapped the small building on the left as a part of the bigger one ... commented 2026-06-18 10:53:54 UTC by Frans S ♦10,686 |
| 184226875 (Comments: 2) | Yurik05 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi JezCrow, Thank you for the review. I can see that ESRI Vector Maps have already been changed to reflect the new roundabout geometry (https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html). Satellite imagery doesn't have fully up-to-date images ... commented 2026-06-18 10:51:08 UTC by Yurik05 ♦1 |
| 183776042 (Comments: 3) | rigilk3nt (Discussed changesets: 22) | It does imply it, just as highway=motorway does, but oneway=yes is useful as an explicit statement. It also plays a part in my personal workflow of searching for oneway=yes and making sure all relations have the forward role, which is how I came acro... commented 2026-06-18 10:43:50 UTC by NE2 ♦13 |
| 184170185 (Comments: 1) | Vivan009 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184265144 commented 2026-06-18 10:43:33 UTC by ajmat ♦224 |
| 165054490 (Comments: 1) | NguyenChuong (Discussed changesets: 5) | hi, when you add buildings like that here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378252087/history#map=19/16.082156/108.238292 please press Q to square the geometry, otherwise they will be quite skewed like they are now, so somebody will have to... commented 2026-06-18 10:37:31 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦398 |
| 184251692 (Comments: 1) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184232684 commented 2026-06-18 09:57:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦534 |
| 184223184 (Comments: 2) | birimkulova (Discussed changesets: 15) | hello\t Thank you for the comment, I’ll take it into account. Thanks! commented 2026-06-18 09:45:47 UTC by birimkulova ♦12 |
 | 74233156 (Comments: 1) | Jorge Aquino (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722965375/history - what this object is supposed to represent? commented 2026-06-18 09:45:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184213596 (Comments: 2) | birimkulova (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi. Thank you for the comment, I’ll take it into account. Thanks! commented 2026-06-18 09:43:17 UTC by birimkulova ♦12 |
| 132103361 (Comments: 1) | Fantastic Fabian (Discussed changesets: 8) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005578 ? commented 2026-06-18 09:39:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184232907 (Comments: 4) | Steve Trumpton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Bernard. There is a temporary path that is partially accessible. I'll walk it with the GPS and upload shortly. commented 2026-06-18 09:17:02 UTC by Steve Trumpton ♦1 |
| 184202677 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184261492 commented 2026-06-18 09:12:19 UTC by ajmat ♦224 |
| 184258954 (Comments: 1) | Mercanto123 (Discussed changesets: 19) | wiesz, jest czerwiec. Takie ściezki trza zimą sprawdzac;] commented 2026-06-18 09:10:59 UTC by Yog Sot ♦479 |
| 107494435 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Cleaned up SEO-spammy and other tags for POI in changeset 184261467 https://osm.org/changeset/184261467 commented 2026-06-18 09:10:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 107495580 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Cleaned up SEO-spammy and other tags for POI in changeset 184261368 https://osm.org/changeset/184261368 commented 2026-06-18 09:08:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 183864568 (Comments: 4) | De mammoet (Discussed changesets: 20) | Maar is dat relevante informatie voor het object zelf? Daarnaast is een tag als 'nvwa_toezicht' een tag die alleen in de Nederlandse context klopt (een Nederlandse instantie plus een Nederlands woord). De richtlijn is om tags juist generiek... commented 2026-06-18 09:04:52 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦767 |
| 103327024 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Split SEO POI details from building to node given it is occupied by other tenants, and cleaned up SEO-spammy tags for "Kofler-Dichtungen" office in changeset 184261221 https://osm.org/changeset/184261221 commented 2026-06-18 09:04:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 107620868 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Added appropriate top-level tags and cleaned up SEO-spammy name=* in changeset 184261043 https://osm.org/changeset/184261043 commented 2026-06-18 09:00:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184246982 (Comments: 3) | De mammoet (Discussed changesets: 20) | Wanneer het om grote objecten gaat waar het terrein ook relevant is, mag vlaktagging ook. Voor ziekenhuizen en scholen is dat gebruikelijk, bij man_made=works en andere grote industriezaken past het ook goed. Het is niet verplicht het zo te doen, maa... commented 2026-06-18 08:59:27 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦767 |
| 184259729 (Comments: 1) | belak (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fråga på https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ är mitt tips ;-) Jag städade OSM från borttagna WD objekt se https://github.com/salgo60/Stockholm_Archipelago_Trail/issues/415 commented 2026-06-18 08:58:38 UTC by salgo60 ♦17 |
| 183245513 (Comments: 4) | Jan Olieslagers (Discussed changesets: 99) | Well, if it is no longer an aerodrome, then the proper handling is to tag both the aerodrome and the runway with "disused" - this will avoid others adding it again. commented 2026-06-18 08:58:05 UTC by Jan Olieslagers ♦217 |
| 124970970 (Comments: 2) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | A number of tags here were malformed (building=*, etc) which were fixed in other changesets, and I cleaned up the remaining SEO-spammy bits in changeset 184260944 https://osm.org/changeset/184260944 commented 2026-06-18 08:57:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184228367 (Comments: 2) | Elizen (Discussed changesets: 26) | You're right. I fixed it commented 2026-06-18 08:57:49 UTC by Elizen ♦78 |
| 184213050 (Comments: 1) | Nemethze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 184260672 commented 2026-06-18 08:51:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 146093470 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | A number of tags here were malformed (opening_hours=*, phone=*, etc) which were fixed in other changesets, and I cleaned up the SEO-spammy name=* in changeset 184260640 https://osm.org/changeset/184260640 commented 2026-06-18 08:51:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
 | 184220312 (Comments: 1) | LibyaD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Thanks for your mapping work in this area. I noticed that you’ve added a lot of waterway=dam tags. osm.org/#map=14/32.37221/14.19047 Please reserve dam for large dams. Happy mapping! commented 2026-06-18 08:50:59 UTC by VLD0251 ♦101 |
| 126469332 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | It seems you changed the address of this existing building, rather than moving the actual POI--which in any case appears to be only one unit of this building and should be a separate node rather than tagging the entire building with it, is missing an... commented 2026-06-18 08:48:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 125017360 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | It seems you changed the address of this existing building, rather than moving the actual POI--which in any case appears to be only one unit of this building and should be a separate node rather than tagging the entire building with it, is missing an... commented 2026-06-18 08:48:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 92891980 (Comments: 1) | mweper (Discussed changesets: 57) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4238370274/history why you added delivery=only ? it makes no sense with shop=clothes commented 2026-06-18 08:43:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 146106196 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted adding SEO POI with malformed tags (name=*, opening_hours=*, phone=*) and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184260267 https://osm.org/changeset/1... commented 2026-06-18 08:42:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 162745013 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted adding SEO POI with malformed tags (name=*, opening_hours=*, phone=*) and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184260189 https://osm.org/changeset/1... commented 2026-06-18 08:40:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184186591 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184260129 commented 2026-06-18 08:39:13 UTC by ajmat ♦224 |
| 163849220 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted adding SEO POI with malformed tags (name=*) and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184260133 https://osm.org/changeset/184260133 commented 2026-06-18 08:38:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 172386941 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted adding SEO POI with malformed tags (name=*, opening_hours=*) and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184260093 https://osm.org/changeset/184260093 commented 2026-06-18 08:37:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 147335563 (Comments: 3) | fayor (Discussed changesets: 117) | I deleted it then commented 2026-06-18 08:35:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 174557788 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags (name=*, opening_hours=*) and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184260023 https://osm.org/changeset/18426... commented 2026-06-18 08:34:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 180446837 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | Revert changeset 180446837 which added a SEO POI with several malformed tags (name=*, opening_hours=*, wikidata=*, etc) and added apparent housenumbers to a highway name=*, in changeset 184259932 https://osm.org/changeset/184259932 commented 2026-06-18 08:33:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184258467 (Comments: 2) | grzegorzmilosz (Discussed changesets: 88) | Może nie wiedziałeś tego ale tworzenie dwóch linii przy tych mikrowysepkach wymaga dodatkowego podziału dróg i utworzenia dodatkowych 6 restrykcji: https://i.imgur.com/D0tK4lO.png Poprawiłem to w CS: https://www.openstree... commented 2026-06-18 08:31:10 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,070 |
| 169368976 (Comments: 3) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 37) | Thank you for the informative answer! I will be taking these on board for the future commented 2026-06-18 08:29:37 UTC by paneva ♦1 |
| 183865353 (Comments: 3) | Ernie C (Discussed changesets: 17) | Mijn excuses. Ik was blijkbaar iets te enthousiast met dingen veranderen. Bedankt voor de feedback. commented 2026-06-18 08:25:42 UTC by Ernie C ♦18 |
| 184137758 (Comments: 1) | yzal (Discussed changesets: 15) | Opravený preklep https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529698865/history commented 2026-06-18 08:24:38 UTC by Dodko ♦1,352 |
| 177421261 (Comments: 1) | grzegorzmilosz (Discussed changesets: 88) | Cześć, dlaczego rysujesz oddzielną linią DDR i chodnik, gdy pomiędzy nimi nie ma podziału fizycznego? Takie pomysły drogowców, jak np. przy ul. Kościuszki, Promenada powinny być rysowane jedną linią highway=path z dodatkowym tagowan... commented 2026-06-18 08:16:57 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,070 |
| 184219831 (Comments: 1) | Filippo Bianchi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Questa modifica è relativa alla nota: #3639180 commented 2026-06-18 08:16:56 UTC by Filippo Bianchi ♦1 |
| 184235275 (Comments: 1) | monsoonheat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi monsoonheat, welcome to OSM. Roads shouldn't cross buildings, so avoid that when mapping. JOSM will always show that as a warning, so fix them before you upload. commented 2026-06-18 08:16:37 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦165 |
| 184182675 (Comments: 3) | mute44 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voila c'est corrigé dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184259315 Désolé pour le dérangement commented 2026-06-18 08:16:32 UTC by mute44 ♦2 |
| 158456294 (Comments: 2) | -=|MisterY|=- (Discussed changesets: 26) | Most likely I've used the info from Bergsteigen at the time. commented 2026-06-18 08:12:26 UTC by -=|MisterY|=- ♦24 |
| 174484124 (Comments: 1) | Openminded320 (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hallo Openminded320, ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13295435850 wirklich eine tourism=wilderness_hut mit Schlafplätzen zum Übernachten, oder ist das eher ein amenity=shelter ? Danke und viele Grüße map pe... commented 2026-06-18 08:10:04 UTC by map per ♦1,325 |
| 184128628 (Comments: 7) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 65) | With (3.), I was trying to say that I don't think https://www.flixbus.de/track shows the actual route. You could check it by searching for street segments in your area that have temporary restrictions or recent constructional changes. For... commented 2026-06-18 08:10:02 UTC by 9_tab ♦71 |
| 184248609 (Comments: 1) | Hair Salon Brazilian Hairstylist (Discussed changesets: 2) | (Review requested) Changing the address tags on the POI doesn't actually move it on the map. Does this mean that the premises at 48 Porchester Road W2 6ET are no longer occupied by your business and that you are now trading from 58... commented 2026-06-18 08:07:27 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,858 |
| 184257248 (Comments: 1) | aibek55 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partly reverted & fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184258816 The northern part is clearly not indented for vehicles (maybe it used for them during the construction of the playground, but not more). And it visibly differs in surfa... commented 2026-06-18 08:03:25 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| 184234033 (Comments: 1) | BinkalB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi BinkalB, building=1 is not a valid tag. Use building=yes commented 2026-06-18 08:02:40 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦165 |
| 184233777 (Comments: 1) | Mensah Silas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mensah Silas, welcome to OSM. Please take a critical look before you upload/save what you map. I doubt you'd find a building in the middle of the road. commented 2026-06-18 07:59:01 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦165 |
| 184135264 (Comments: 1) | ske (Discussed changesets: 1) | Par définition footway interdit la circulation à vélo. commented 2026-06-18 07:56:26 UTC by Rom1 ♦411 |
| 184135016 (Comments: 1) | Yoyo bibi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, j'ai remis supermarket à https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722979213 convenience est réservé aux petits commerces https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dconvenience commented 2026-06-18 07:53:58 UTC by Rom1 ♦411 |
| 184160966 (Comments: 2) | AVeryRealName (Discussed changesets: 1) | or maybe even skip mapping this if it is only for internal use... commented 2026-06-18 07:47:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 153158558 (Comments: 2) | -=|MisterY|=- (Discussed changesets: 26) | Thank you! Fixed. commented 2026-06-18 07:34:24 UTC by -=|MisterY|=- ♦24 |
| 184228385 (Comments: 1) | pdg4923 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:184257726 commented 2026-06-18 07:30:02 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 183973000 (Comments: 1) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 197) | Dag Emvee, De situatie in dit deel is tijdelijk gewijzigd. Het zuidelijke fietspad van de Burg Brokxlaan is deels afgesloten en de zuidelijke weghelft is in gebruik als fietspad. Dit is zeker tot 4/6/2027 volgens https://bereikbaarheid.andes.nl/. ... commented 2026-06-18 07:24:11 UTC by donux-nl ♦20 |
| 184245614 (Comments: 1) | Adinurbekov (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted - these are not parking_aisles , please re-read it carefully: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=parking_aisle#Disambiguation https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184257432 commented 2026-06-18 07:21:42 UTC by yelisey90 ♦526 |
| 179417491 (Comments: 2) | PluMGMK (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi! Yeah, because of the different offsets on newer imagery, someone had added four "trees" that were actually pylons I had already mapped. Thinking about it now, it might have been AI-assisted... commented 2026-06-18 07:17:47 UTC by PluMGMK ♦23 |
| 184256734 (Comments: 2) | Bodyinvestments (Discussed changesets: 1) | warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway \t6 warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway \t26 De schade is weer hersteld. commented 2026-06-18 07:11:28 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184208954 (Comments: 5) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 12) | 关于公交关系，您可以参考 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E5%85%AC%E4%BA%A4 感谢您的贡献 commented 2026-06-18 07:07:41 UTC by hahae ♦33 |
| 184203903 (Comments: 3) | Berseter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke. Bei OSM ist natürlich immer auch eine gewisse Abstraktion im Spiel ;-). Das Tag dient im Wesentlichen dazu festzulegen, dass der Weg im Bereich des Gebäudeumrisses durch das Gebäude verläuft und nicht oberhalb (layer=1) ... commented 2026-06-18 06:59:22 UTC by aixbrick ♦920 |
| 184219420 (Comments: 1) | roronano (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:184256724 commented 2026-06-18 06:58:42 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 176563629 (Comments: 3) | Bartekkmee (Discussed changesets: 30) | Jakiś link do tej strony z informacjami dot. l. pierwszorzędnych (bo te linie są pierwszorzędne)? Bo akurat w papierologii PKP PLK siedzę od jakiegoś czasu i chyba nie wiem, o czym jest mowa Sam fakt, że linia jest pierwszorzędna nie j... commented 2026-06-18 06:48:36 UTC by Anas masuris ♦188 |
| 184255650 (Comments: 1) | Aittupedia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, retiro los tags > HECTARIAS > id > perimetro > union de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530514206/history Saludos commented 2026-06-18 06:48:08 UTC by aTarom ♦957 |
| 183492897 (Comments: 1) | skycastle66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo skycastle66, du hast hier fälschlicherweise ein Wald-Polygon als Zaun gemappt. Ich nehme an, das war ein Versehen? Ich mache deine Änderung rückgängig. Gruß commented 2026-06-18 06:47:37 UTC by Edelsalami ♦124 |
| 184137893 (Comments: 4) | wilda69 (Discussed changesets: 43) | btw its difficult to say how long it was like this. The area around the chalets is all grass and was cut but strikingly no sign of a former path commented 2026-06-18 06:47:31 UTC by wilda69 ♦29 |
| 147959962 (Comments: 1) | Klixpert (Discussed changesets: 15) | The address may have changed, but it seems you didn't actually move the POI to the new location... commented 2026-06-18 06:47:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 184195505 (Comments: 4) | harmenhuizinga (Discussed changesets: 5) | Het voetpad (looproute) heb ik aangepast zodat het niet meer door het gebouw loopt. commented 2026-06-18 06:41:15 UTC by eggie ♦45,632 |
| 184255454 (Comments: 1) | uk_mapfan_2025 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Meant `railway:preferred_direction=` not bidirectional tagging commented 2026-06-18 06:14:06 UTC by uk_mapfan_2025 ♦2 |
| 184202564 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184255263 commented 2026-06-18 06:04:07 UTC by MappingMore ♦534 |
| 184138534 (Comments: 2) | gion274 (Discussed changesets: 13) | yes, you're right, thanks, I corrected it commented 2026-06-18 06:01:53 UTC by gion274 ♦28 |
| 132549160 (Comments: 2) | YomanNH (Discussed changesets: 64) | Wspaniale :) Czasem coś zgłaszam, ale rzadko. commented 2026-06-18 06:01:32 UTC by YomanNH ♦501 |
| 184252061 (Comments: 2) | Geo_Gunzel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the eagle eye! Done. commented 2026-06-18 05:50:16 UTC by Geo_Gunzel ♦2 |
| 181493395 (Comments: 2) | YuiChan (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi YuiChan We received a report about your edit, which is sometimes not reasonable, and some mappers reach out to you ask what happened. Here is the list: osm.org/changeset/181493395 osm.org/changeset/178454873 osm.org... commented 2026-06-18 05:47:43 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,310 |
| 183777172 (Comments: 2) | Валентин Ян (Discussed changesets: 47) | ось посилання https://www.khm.gov.ua/uk/node/73325 commented 2026-06-18 05:45:52 UTC by docstat ♦1 |
| 179710644 (Comments: 1) | Parowiec Świecący (Discussed changesets: 9) | no, napisałem mejla :) Attachment: 1757538057305.jpg From: Mateusz Konieczny To: rowery@zdmk.krakow.pl Subject: Czemu wybudowana droga dla rowerów nie jest oznakowana jako droga dla rowerów (przy Giedroycia od strony po... commented 2026-06-18 05:42:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,988 |
| 184202712 (Comments: 1) | flyingember (Discussed changesets: 270) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184254439 commented 2026-06-18 05:25:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦534 |
| 181349988 (Comments: 4) | GBI NARWASTU (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep, thanks; I realized that after I read your comment on the later changeset, and had it in my queue to deal with. I restored it and fixed/conslidated some of the duplicate and malformed tags in changeset 184253959 https://osm.org/changeset/1... commented 2026-06-18 05:05:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦968 |
| 179774711 (Comments: 5) | Stay Texas Hospitality Group (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi CAM-Gerlach, Thank you for your feedback. This has been something we already discussed and adopted after these discussions. commented 2026-06-18 05:04:27 UTC by MappingMore ♦534 |
| 184194831 (Comments: 2) | g0nz (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530170608 commented 2026-06-18 04:54:14 UTC by AgusQui ♦646 |
| 183925792 (Comments: 1) | mj dziendziel (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! I'm curious if you have a source for these "future developments" (that you added in this and related changesets)? commented 2026-06-18 04:23:53 UTC by EllieNyaa ♦23 |
| 184017038 (Comments: 4) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi JeroenvanderGun, thank you for your comments and for taking the time to validate the edit. Based on street-level imagery dated May 31, south end is only blocked with beacons whereas north end is blocked with guardrails, as you confirm ... commented 2026-06-18 04:11:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦168 |
| 162364273 (Comments: 1) | nianticgarbage (Discussed changesets: 9) | Is the sidewalk that used to run between Oak Street and W 15th Place removed now? Where the crosswalk crosses Oak Street across from Applebee's. commented 2026-06-18 04:03:16 UTC by varnish-WIDELY-downy ♦3 |
| 184210936 (Comments: 3) | chath_tsu (Discussed changesets: 15) | It sounds like you have a reasonable grasp of the placement scheme. I'd be willing to bet I missed a couple when I was doing that edit. I don't think there's necessarily any specific lane one should choose to track when using placement... commented 2026-06-18 03:59:35 UTC by Moonfire ♦7 |
| 184227029 (Comments: 2) | ScottyThePilko (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hey Allie, thanks for your work. My apologies for the mistake, that was just carelessness on my part (I thought I had walked along there IRL recently enough but I guess it was a couple months back now). I'll do my best to avoid und... commented 2026-06-18 03:45:07 UTC by ScottyThePilko ♦7 |