| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 189871867 (Comments: 2) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 26) | Surement, j'ai cherché un peu ce qui était mieux, mais j'avais pas trouvé destroyed commented 2026-10-02 12:29:26 UTC by BardafFr ♦26 |
 | 189818028 (Comments: 2) | esquire900 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Kees, Dankjewel voor je suggestie, je hebt helemaal gelijk. Nieuw platform voor mij dus dank voor het meekijken :) Ik was in de StreetCorner app bezig, klopt het dat ik die aanvullingen daar niet kan doen? commented 2026-10-02 12:27:28 UTC by esquire900 ♦1 |
| 189445073 (Comments: 1) | Noah Reijnen (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ha, de huidige situatie is wel iets anders dan hoe die nu is ingetekend, zie https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.82518,5.825726,17/?datastrip=20260925_SVNEO-01&bbox=51.82331%2C5.82685%2C51.82490%2C5.82845 (opname van vorige week) commented 2026-10-02 12:21:49 UTC by rutgerbrf ♦4 |
 | 189875218 (Comments: 1) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, danke fürs lösen des Hinweises. Ich glaube building:levels\t3\t roof:levels\t1\t roof:shape\thipped\t source\tYahoo Die Werte sollten auch noch raus, die stimmen ja auf jeden Fall nicht mehr. :) commented 2026-10-02 12:21:01 UTC by Negreheb ♦419 |
 | 189869367 (Comments: 1) | PhamTienSon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Chào bạn. Tại sao bạn lại ghi số tầng của tòa nhà vào thẻ name=* ? Nếu bạn muốn thêm thông tin số tầng của tòa nhà thì bạn có thể ghi vào thẻ... commented 2026-10-02 12:17:32 UTC by vietnam321 ♦19 |
 | 188884580 (Comments: 1) | Meeliz (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14173995899. What is the mean of the tags lest_x = 6442846.963 lest_y = 695865.512 What is the mean of the tags stop_area = Räpina vald stop_code = 6500563-1 stop_i... commented 2026-10-02 12:10:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,862 |
 | 189410360 (Comments: 1) | Faberitex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich lass das von unserem Experten nochmal checken. Vielen Dank! commented 2026-10-02 12:10:03 UTC by ADACHessenThueringen ♦2 |
| 188823925 (Comments: 2) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Op de gevel staat toch echt The Readshop XL. Maar vind het prima. commented 2026-10-02 12:04:34 UTC by RobbyS63 ♦5 |
| X | 169884727 (Comments: 6) | ceirios (Discussed changesets: 23) | That's now changed at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/changelog.md and will be visible at the next release. commented 2026-10-02 12:01:14 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,884 |
| 189870524 (Comments: 1) | Pebbles_1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Servus, danke fürs mithelfen! Bitte nicht einfach den Punkt verschieben. Ich sag immer, wie mappen das Geschäftslokal und das bleibt ja am gleichen ort. Es ist nur etwas anderes drinnen. Kannst du das noch anpassen? :) Wenn d... commented 2026-10-02 11:54:59 UTC by Negreheb ♦419 |
 | 189825090 (Comments: 1) | Tyoma14 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi! When you added a hotel as a node within a building polygon (I consider it as best practice), you shouldn't add hotel name to the polygon represents the building. Please check hotel სასტუმრო უნიკალი commented 2026-10-02 11:54:12 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189829674 (Comments: 1) | СергейБА (Discussed changesets: 1) | Привет! Вижу, что вы лично были на местности. Но есть много замечаний по тому, как именно вы внесли данные на карту. 1. Мы не в носим ... commented 2026-10-02 11:50:10 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189869356 (Comments: 11) | maarten sijmkens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maarten, Ik heb een terugmelding gedaan bij de Gemeente Gouda. De logica is ver te zoeken. Zal wel laten weten wat hun antwoord is. MVG, eggie commented 2026-10-02 11:44:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
 | 189872738 (Comments: 2) | fb552 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Non riesco a scaricare il layer Bing al momento. Ho solo esri, mapbox e pcn. Mi fermo un attimo di mappare finché non riesco a scaricare commented 2026-10-02 11:39:26 UTC by fb552 ♦25 |
| 189846852 (Comments: 1) | Blip-blip (Discussed changesets: 2) | We don't add name for ATM, only brand and operator https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189873569 commented 2026-10-02 11:38:05 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189871393 (Comments: 1) | Comrade Bulkin (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's better not to add source=NAPR for every object when this source is specified in the changeset commented 2026-10-02 11:32:04 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
 | 119530551 (Comments: 1) | Saeed Sarshar (Discussed changesets: 1) | gps live commented 2026-10-02 11:30:30 UTC by Kiwikami ♦1 |
 | 189872575 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 122) | wiki page is at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/migrate_multiple_climbing_tags commented 2026-10-02 11:24:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
 | 189810093 (Comments: 1) | griba (Discussed changesets: 23) | Strona nie wygląda na prawidłową commented 2026-10-02 11:19:05 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,494 |
| 189817241 (Comments: 1) | TheRadScientist (Discussed changesets: 2) | Żabka przejęła drugi lokal, czy po prostu został zamknięty? Jeśli to drugie to lepiej zmienić na disused:shop=* ew. shop=vacant, żeby podtrzymać historię lokalu i było go łatwiej zaktualizować w tym samym punkcie. commented 2026-10-02 11:17:12 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,494 |
| 189767517 (Comments: 2) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi, its simply because in this case Desborough is a separate entity to the postal town/city (Kettering). If there was an urban sprawl as it were, then Desborough could indeed be described as a suburb of Kettering but seeing as there is clear country... commented 2026-10-02 10:55:51 UTC by ⇄ john paul jones & gringo ♦38 |
 | 189798278 (Comments: 2) | fuck4ndyt0wns3nd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted for vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189871330 commented 2026-10-02 10:47:29 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦31 |
 | 179876649 (Comments: 2) | zsolt d (Discussed changesets: 225) | Köszi, takarítottam kicsit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189871079 commented 2026-10-02 10:41:37 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
 | 178180752 (Comments: 1) | Seth Connold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hot Task for Mozambique? but editing in Indonesia commented 2026-10-02 10:33:50 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 182331712 (Comments: 3) | Poesil (Discussed changesets: 3) | Habs geänder, danke dir! commented 2026-10-02 10:32:14 UTC by Poesil ♦3 |
 | 189609670 (Comments: 1) | alexxromero (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21445938 this has strange geometry, you know.... commented 2026-10-02 10:31:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 188422677 (Comments: 1) | zlyntud (Discussed changesets: 19) | masih ada yang belum tertutup, silakan cek https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=112.03906&lat=-6.88850&zoom=15&baselayer=OSM%20Carto%20(OSMF)&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Crole_should... commented 2026-10-02 10:30:05 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189807639 (Comments: 1) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 54) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14729835 Bukan begitu caranya membuat tugu perbatasan. Yang ada malah error commented 2026-10-02 10:28:53 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189867501 (Comments: 1) | Keipi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 10:28:40 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 181403685 (Comments: 1) | Wikiscout (Discussed changesets: 25) | gibts Pizza, Pasta, Sphaghetti & Co überhaupt noch? commented 2026-10-02 10:24:57 UTC by Pebbles_1 ♦1 |
| 189820890 (Comments: 3) | eri jahai (Discussed changesets: 5) | im stuck with this map HELP! commented 2026-10-02 10:24:45 UTC by eri jahai ♦1 |
 | 189840393 (Comments: 1) | Brendaalcudrado2009 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please have a look at the opening hours you added. This tag needs a specific tagging scheme, e.g. no "AM/PM" as described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours commented 2026-10-02 10:04:50 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189687985 (Comments: 1) | Edagar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you added many shops with idential names. Please make sure that the 'name' is the actual name of the shop, and not just a description like 'muebleria'. commented 2026-10-02 10:03:11 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 179821039 (Comments: 1) | StreetK34T (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset moved this boundary https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388078427 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189869442 commented 2026-10-02 10:03:08 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189843262 (Comments: 1) | MayteBadillo12 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, I noticed you and others adding many strange tags like these listed below: What do they mean? Please make sure to agree on one common spelling in all edits! clave clave de verificaion clave_de_verificaacion clve de verificac... commented 2026-10-02 10:01:55 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189573340 (Comments: 1) | Nanepiwo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you used the key "keyfob" here - what does it mean? commented 2026-10-02 09:50:50 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 185034576 (Comments: 2) | mlody ghoul (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nowe nazwy są w obiegu oficjalnych dokumentów urzędowych i pracach naukowych. Są one też używane w raportach ZGH Bolesław: https://zghboleslaw.pl/pl/aktualnosci/likwidacja-kopalni https://bip.malopolska.pl/api/files/3996959... commented 2026-10-02 09:48:45 UTC by mlody ghoul ♦1 |
 | 189861580 (Comments: 1) | tyksom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dobrá práce, díky! commented 2026-10-02 09:42:42 UTC by VladaC ♦40 |
| 189867019 (Comments: 3) | Elenainciviel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi.. Je selecteert de voorgaande steiger en dan delete. Je had ook de voorgaande steiger kunnen aanpassen. Daar had ik toen wat onlogische accesstags vanaf gehaald. Succes.. eggie commented 2026-10-02 09:41:02 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 160693209 (Comments: 1) | Neil James Tarrant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I know it was a while ago, but foot=no is not correct for roads like this. foot=no is strictly about legal access/rights to use the way. In the UK, almost all roads are legally accessible on foot. The main exceptions are motorways. Otherwise acce... commented 2026-10-02 09:34:52 UTC by Borbus ♦32 |
 | 189862316 (Comments: 1) | Colbertson (Discussed changesets: 36) | fixing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189837394 commented 2026-10-02 09:32:57 UTC by Colbertson ♦180 |
 | 189864352 (Comments: 1) | Aeiouau (Discussed changesets: 3) | forgot to add the hashtags, darnit! #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober commented 2026-10-02 09:28:28 UTC by Aeiouau ♦9 |
| 189866098 (Comments: 1) | Aeiouau (Discussed changesets: 3) | forgot to add the hashtags, darnit! #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober commented 2026-10-02 09:28:21 UTC by Aeiouau ♦9 |
| 189864148 (Comments: 2) | Lizzy- Flitsmeister (Discussed changesets: 2) | De landuse construction heb ik hier aangepast. CTRL- F5 voor versneld effect. commented 2026-10-02 09:28:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189865511 (Comments: 1) | jvanhienen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dit is toch de achterkant van die huizenrij? Service klopt hier volgens mij wel. commented 2026-10-02 09:26:26 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦801 |
| 189857275 (Comments: 1) | Aditya1382 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Terima kasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan, koreksi letak bangunan, menambahkan jalan/bangunan, menghapus jalan/bangunan 🤗 unt... commented 2026-10-02 09:25:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189751035 (Comments: 2) | Bobby&Anya (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dankuwel! commented 2026-10-02 09:21:09 UTC by Bobby&Anya ♦2 |
| 189864901 (Comments: 1) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 17) | seasonal=yes saja sudah cukup commented 2026-10-02 09:20:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189295111 (Comments: 2) | spughetti (Discussed changesets: 70) | Thanks🙏🙏 commented 2026-10-02 09:14:22 UTC by spughetti ♦124 |
| 175380769 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376768194/ Why have you changed the man_made=reservoir_covered - an underground water tank to a water=reservoir - a reservoir that you might find on a river? The only work that happened ... commented 2026-10-02 09:11:23 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,269 |
| 182013430 (Comments: 2) | GrabID_FaizahM (Discussed changesets: 4) | seharusnya gak perlu tag akses motorcar, tapi ditambahkan lanes=1 commented 2026-10-02 09:11:12 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 188485591 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037929972/ How come you changed the underground power cable to an overhead power line? commented 2026-10-02 09:02:18 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,269 |
| 189861136 (Comments: 1) | Dylanvd041200 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:55:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189861089 (Comments: 1) | vrstrkp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:55:18 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189860037 (Comments: 1) | stasel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:54:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189859761 (Comments: 1) | amirmasoudabdol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:53:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189865647 (Comments: 1) | gmar5 (Discussed changesets: 28) | This reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189793098 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189848112 These are the current explicit default values (plus time-based conditions): motorcar=permit motorhome=permit bicycle... commented 2026-10-02 08:53:11 UTC by gmar5 ♦105 |
| 189859446 (Comments: 1) | 92640203946610002980831 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 08:53:08 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189793098 (Comments: 5) | DrivingOxford (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189865647 commented 2026-10-02 08:49:49 UTC by gmar5 ♦105 |
| 189848112 (Comments: 2) | DrivingOxford (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189865647 commented 2026-10-02 08:49:20 UTC by gmar5 ♦105 |
| 186995861 (Comments: 2) | TranslatorPS (Discussed changesets: 37) | W tym wszystkim najlepsze jest to, że ten komentarz zobaczyłem dopiero wczoraj. W każdym razie uzupełnione → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189865398 commented 2026-10-02 08:44:03 UTC by TranslatorPS ♦50 |
 | 184016226 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 377) | The southern parts of way/1495044511 and the barrier west of it are not "wire fences". commented 2026-10-02 08:41:14 UTC by cyclist789 ♦135 |
 | 189629038 (Comments: 2) | AstroAure (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Indeed, they all are rescue_box. Sorry, I hadn't see this tag when I created these points. commented 2026-10-02 08:38:00 UTC by AstroAure ♦1 |
 | 189822845 (Comments: 2) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 155) | It's tentative. I would have used `landmark:*=yes` , not them. commented 2026-10-02 08:24:49 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,054 |
| 189827677 (Comments: 4) | StC (Discussed changesets: 30) | Pas de pb. Je comprends l’objectif. On avance 😊 Concernant vos questions : - signalements à l’IGN. À rediscuter : est-ce que ça vaut le coup de faire 1 signalement alors qu’il pourrait y en avoir d&rsq... commented 2026-10-02 08:09:48 UTC by cr85 ♦3 |
 | 174321953 (Comments: 1) | Sigurdblueface (Discussed changesets: 15) | already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8628394193 commented 2026-10-02 08:09:14 UTC by Layft Greater ♦225 |
 | 189612023 (Comments: 2) | Kesh-LOW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yeah. Your right the store has a second part where the old marker is. My bad. commented 2026-10-02 07:42:46 UTC by Kesh-LOW ♦1 |
| 189837394 (Comments: 2) | vaivis (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189862316 commented 2026-10-02 07:29:31 UTC by Colbertson ♦180 |
 | 189031625 (Comments: 1) | Irina1981 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442182712/history#map=16/52.04051/39.73656&layers=N Добрый день. Просьба внимательно смотреть, что меняйте, это выглядит как вандализм.<... commented 2026-10-02 07:26:58 UTC by DRiveR39 ♦37 |
 | 189861472 (Comments: 1) | lpf452 (Discussed changesets: 6) | *Auto-generated following a large commit* NOTE: ALL edits included in this changeset were performed manually based on community-approved data sources. They are not automated imports, nor were they traced from unauthorized third-party sources (... commented 2026-10-02 07:10:23 UTC by lpf452 ♦7 |
| 165368730 (Comments: 6) | archINFORM (Discussed changesets: 15) | I've restored Q170119 as Wikidata ID. Humboldt Forum (museum) by the way is already mapped separately as node/8413352835, which seems reasonable. Possible further steps to improve things on Wikidata's side: 1) consider creating separ... commented 2026-10-02 07:09:55 UTC by Pikse ♦250 |
| 189848079 (Comments: 4) | Chris Alberda (Discussed changesets: 2) | De school heb ik als bovenstaand aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-02 07:08:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189486227 (Comments: 1) | nnf635 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Kannst Du Dir diese Änderung noch einmal genauer ansehen? Fährt der BW1 immer von/ab Kindergarten? Sollte man dann nicht den Namen entsprechend abändern? oder fährt nur der "Rufauto BW1: Bad Wildbad Bahnhof => Neuwei... commented 2026-10-02 07:03:46 UTC by Senihtu ♦200 |
| 189857629 (Comments: 1) | GrabID_FaizahM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Perumahan itu masih bisa masuk dan bukan tanah sendiri, jadi pakainya permissive. Private itu udah tergolong tanah sendiri commented 2026-10-02 07:00:57 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189106192 (Comments: 17) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 155) | Why don't you ask the original authors? If an attribute has been set on a shorter section, it should be kept. commented 2026-10-02 06:58:45 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,054 |
| 189809554 (Comments: 3) | Kovoschiz (Discussed changesets: 155) | 1. Again as aforementioned, if you have disagreements on its status, you should add `sac_scale=` etc for the passability. `highway=scramble` etc has been discussed, but `=path` is still the mainstay. commented 2026-10-02 06:56:56 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,054 |
| 189792787 (Comments: 3) | phodgkin (Discussed changesets: 40) | Cheers! commented 2026-10-02 06:54:29 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,126 |
| 189860087 (Comments: 1) | LaraMJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 06:52:07 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189859406 (Comments: 1) | JkWa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-02 06:50:24 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
 | 186063560 (Comments: 2) | likesrhubarb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tack! commented 2026-10-02 06:47:08 UTC by likesrhubarb ♦1 |
| 189134004 (Comments: 2) | Peter W34 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi Joel. No problem, you can change them. Some of those didn’t have mail boxes at the front. The postie must ride in. I don't walk up the driveways though. I figure that the numbers will get you pretty close if you are using OSM to navigat... commented 2026-10-02 06:39:42 UTC by Peter W34 ♦15 |
| 141902146 (Comments: 3) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 68) | Ok, danke dir! commented 2026-10-02 06:34:53 UTC by ayxis ♦70 |
 | 184956548 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:31:49 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 185635634 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:31:28 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 185655071 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:29:46 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 187611235 (Comments: 1) | WrógRowerówElektrycznych (Discussed changesets: 2) | Są te numery oznakowane w terenie? commented 2026-10-02 06:22:48 UTC by krzysiuup ♦8 |
 | 181938441 (Comments: 1) | cRaIgalLAn (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi cRaIgalLAn, this changeset has destroyed a bare_rock relation and left behind the "inner" members: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=36.70824&lat=-0.47178&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&... commented 2026-10-02 06:16:15 UTC by gscholz ♦3,003 |
| 188522538 (Comments: 2) | NickBprime (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, sur le nom, le changement correspond à la dénomination utilisée depuis le passage aux adresses normalisées (et l'usage était antérieur); la mairie doit avoir négligé de mettre &agr... commented 2026-10-02 06:05:41 UTC by NickBprime ♦1 |
| 185993742 (Comments: 2) | SPLATPLAYS (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks for catching that Joel, I have fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189859388 . commented 2026-10-02 05:55:55 UTC by SPLATPLAYS ♦10 |
 | 189847581 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189857280 commented 2026-10-02 05:54:01 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189847635 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189857394 commented 2026-10-02 05:53:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189848098 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Vandalism commented 2026-10-02 05:52:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189859280 (Comments: 1) | seav (Discussed changesets: 39) | Oops. Forgot the #31DayOSMChallenge and #Maptober hashtags commented 2026-10-02 05:51:56 UTC by seav ♦169 |
| 189847652 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Vandalism commented 2026-10-02 05:51:55 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189847762 (Comments: 2) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Vandalism commented 2026-10-02 05:51:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189851805 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Vandalism commented 2026-10-02 05:51:39 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189859255 (Comments: 1) | ChehrehBargi (Discussed changesets: 64) | The local name was correct and is being restored. To confirm whether the local name is correct or not, local users are invited to confirm the correctness of the name. commented 2026-10-02 05:50:09 UTC by ChehrehBargi ♦573 |
| 124992035 (Comments: 1) | NGL-engel (Discussed changesets: 104) | Moin aus Wildeshausen! Kannst Du diesen Knoten bitte noch mal prüfen: https://www.osm.org/node/9957960595 Das Haus daneben hat die Adressse Dorfstraße 10, nicht 14. commented 2026-10-02 05:49:12 UTC by GerdP ♦2,876 |
| 189807373 (Comments: 2) | myxor (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hey silversurfer83, alles klar, ich habe es angepasst. Danke commented 2026-10-02 05:41:37 UTC by myxor ♦6 |
| 189610577 (Comments: 1) | Channel91 (Discussed changesets: 5) | be careful you left the highway=crossing even though you deleted the line through the road. commented 2026-10-02 05:31:50 UTC by Natfoot ♦133 |
 | 189858049 (Comments: 1) | MarbleMax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please do not change buildings to random shapes next time. Change reverted commented 2026-10-02 05:28:39 UTC by DaanLT ♦119 |
 | 189835741 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam addition of hotel name to scrub area reverted in changeset 189858535 commented 2026-10-02 05:18:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189808074 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 10) | Then it should be tagged as such, not repeatedly deleted with no explanation, and you should actually respond when repeatedly asked for one. See https://osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F and https://osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_road... commented 2026-10-02 05:17:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189839502 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | All you are doing is making the POIs you are being paid to promote strictly _less_ up to date and visible to users by taking the existing correct address, phone and name and making them malformed and invalid, and moving it from an actual building to ... commented 2026-10-02 05:08:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
 | 137598091 (Comments: 1) | Lababulscio (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10167411008/history what you meant by waterway=water_point ? commented 2026-10-02 04:53:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189857623 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 56) | Why did you remove the valid old_ref=* tag from the highway=motorway_junction node? The old_ref=* tag provides useful information to other mappers about the history of the feature. --- Published using OSM... commented 2026-10-02 04:44:51 UTC by Frank Peng ♦237 |
 | 189856611 (Comments: 1) | RedbandanaAndrew (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Redbandana Thank you for taking the time for mapping this area. It helps a lot a s humanitarian response. One note, you do not need to add area=yes to each building. commented 2026-10-02 04:16:39 UTC by AngocA ♦245 |
 | 189648960 (Comments: 1) | nyanpsyche (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hmm, I see where you're coming from but I'm afraid I can't see classifications like this working out. I definitely am not quite content with Oak St being classified the same as Wolfe and 15th, nor with the primary classification ending... commented 2026-10-02 04:08:43 UTC by in2itivity ♦11 |
| 188063679 (Comments: 15) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 24) | jeg har ikke nævnt at ruten er brudt af hegnet, jeg har sagt at du har oprettet en rute der ikke er der eller bliver brugt som sådan og spurgt hvorfor? commented 2026-10-02 03:35:20 UTC by kortgodt ♦123 |
 | 170940429 (Comments: 1) | jplahti (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tämä laiturien kohdistaminen auttaa erittäin paljon etenkin silloin kun pitää vaihtaa junaa ja vaihtoaika on hyvin rajallinen. Lisää sujuvuutta kun tietää että vaihto on samalla laiturilla mutta va... commented 2026-10-02 03:10:08 UTC by Kimmo Koops ♦1 |
| 183943298 (Comments: 1) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 232) | Random question: Is there a reason Aries is tagged as place=quarter instead of a different tag, like t̶y̶p̶e̶=c̶o̶n̶s̶t̶e̶l̶l̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ a̶s̶t̶r̶o̶l̶o̶g̶y̶=z̶o̶d̶i̶a̶c̶ place=suburb or place=neighbourhood? Since Foothi... commented 2026-10-02 02:57:02 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦374 |
| 189837116 (Comments: 2) | Artha14 (Discussed changesets: 3) | done thank you commented 2026-10-02 02:51:08 UTC by Artha14 ♦3 |
| 189587236 (Comments: 1) | AN11 (Discussed changesets: 4) | memang bangunannya sudah tidak ada? commented 2026-10-02 01:35:11 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189839643 (Comments: 1) | lampronessa (Discussed changesets: 12) | why did you make this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564203989 there's no separator and definitely not a road commented 2026-10-02 01:33:05 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189836008 (Comments: 1) | wafriadi (Discussed changesets: 2) | tandonnya hilang dari peta commented 2026-10-02 01:25:35 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189836193 (Comments: 1) | wafriadi (Discussed changesets: 2) | perubahan ini membuat tandonnya jadi hilang commented 2026-10-02 01:21:47 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189794850 (Comments: 1) | Keith Helbley (Discussed changesets: 15) | Sorry for being annoying - but have you used Google Street View by any chance? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548313 commented 2026-10-02 01:00:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
 | 189801040 (Comments: 1) | TheCFG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Configured Gumi Namtong-dong, Sandong-eup regions commented 2026-10-02 00:55:27 UTC by TheCFG ♦2 |
| 189800305 (Comments: 1) | TheCFG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Configured Namtong-dong region commented 2026-10-02 00:55:00 UTC by TheCFG ♦2 |
| 187841092 (Comments: 3) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thanks for double-checking here commented 2026-10-02 00:15:38 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦20 |
| 183517293 (Comments: 1) | JohnnyCarrey (Discussed changesets: 4) | Человек неразумный, на кой ляд вы выпиливали остановки??? commented 2026-10-02 00:10:29 UTC by Bobropiton ♦149 |
| 189832310 (Comments: 1) | TG-map4 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Danke! commented 2026-10-02 00:06:06 UTC by LucGommans ♦79 |
 | 189853440 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 90) | Essa rua tem uma placa de 40 km/h: https://www.google.com/maps/@-18.8765968,-41.9795799,3a,15.8y,85.79h,73.04t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s5Qp-DkeURWS5mYu1Cg3j6A!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.clients6.google.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv... commented 2026-10-02 00:02:40 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦96 |
 | 189730048 (Comments: 1) | grAnd1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. You have change landuse=construction to building=apartments tag, which created a weird situation on the map, where two buildings overlap each other, with the building you created having a non-sensical shape. If you wanted to specify that const... commented 2026-10-01 23:49:53 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦31 |
| 189845697 (Comments: 1) | cwhitby (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) "The tag access=permit indicates an area or feature which is open only to people who have obtained a permit granting them access." Who issues these permits and when was this introduced? Tagging on the... commented 2026-10-01 23:14:45 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,940 |
| 189498161 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 92) | It appears in this changeset here that you incorrectly adjusted a road from its actual alignment seen in aerial imagery to try to resolve a crossing_ways issue in the iD editor. Please don't adjust or align roads away from buildings or other fea... commented 2026-10-01 23:14:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦237 |
| 189852119 (Comments: 1) | JriSv250 (Discussed changesets: 56) | #31DayOSMChallenge commented 2026-10-01 23:02:08 UTC by JriSv250 ♦32 |
| 181286964 (Comments: 3) | bbmiller (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2026-10-01 23:01:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189841265 (Comments: 1) | BeaconOSM (Discussed changesets: 83) | Illinois? I believe this is Wisconsin. And thanks for adding in the buildings! commented 2026-10-01 22:55:34 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 181988102 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 92) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182148478 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181988102 commented 2026-10-01 22:51:08 UTC by Frank Peng ♦237 |
| 189483956 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 33) | Mir war nicht bekannt wie lange die Straße gesperrt ist. commented 2026-10-01 21:47:41 UTC by cuzi ♦193 |
| 189408247 (Comments: 1) | craigsteapartyy (Discussed changesets: 2) | This camera and the others you have posted are not flock surveillance cameras. these are all city of charlottetown owned e watch program cameras that are owned and operated by the city. to call them flock cameras is disingenuous without proof they ar... commented 2026-10-01 21:46:15 UTC by AriXVX ♦2 |
| 189411860 (Comments: 1) | craigsteapartyy (Discussed changesets: 2) | This camera and the others you have posted are not flock surveillance cameras. these are all city of charlottetown owned e watch program cameras that are owned and operated by the city. to call them flock cameras is disingenuous without proof they ar... commented 2026-10-01 21:46:04 UTC by AriXVX ♦2 |
| 189845522 (Comments: 1) | Hesh123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-01 21:41:47 UTC by Udarian ♦949 |
| 189839825 (Comments: 1) | Tjr33150 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-01 21:40:03 UTC by Udarian ♦949 |
| 189849481 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 66) | source=survey commented 2026-10-01 21:39:23 UTC by Alex_457 ♦86 |
| 189839750 (Comments: 1) | Tjr33150 (Discussed changesets: 4) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-01 21:38:15 UTC by Udarian ♦949 |
| 189599877 (Comments: 4) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 60) | No - I'm not involved in or aware of that project. commented 2026-10-01 21:14:17 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦132 |
| 134191886 (Comments: 2) | Niels Elgaard Larsen (Discussed changesets: 403) | Tak. Har rettet det. commented 2026-10-01 21:10:00 UTC by Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦625 |
| 189790624 (Comments: 5) | blosfrth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Afegir les voreres és una bona opció. Diria que la majoria d'editors consideren que milloren el mapa. Altres usuarios prefereixen simplificar/reduir el número d'algunes voreres.Si afegeixes les voreres, no caldria afegi... commented 2026-10-01 21:09:32 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,884 |
| 189826275 (Comments: 1) | Voidnox90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin :) zwei Kleinigkeiten: - wenn du, wie du im Änderungssatz sagst, geguckt hast, wäre es ggf. am Besten die Antennen als Punkte an der Stelle des Silos zu setzen, wo sie wirklich sind. Kann dann location=* und support=* mit... commented 2026-10-01 21:07:00 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,361 |
| 189838818 (Comments: 1) | WompatuckSupervisor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello again, incase you didnt see my last message on your last changeset here it is again. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM... commented 2026-10-01 20:33:20 UTC by MassCartog ♦484 |
| 189845425 (Comments: 2) | Meesch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Je edits https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=189845425#19/51.95038/6.01066 commented 2026-10-01 20:20:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 185819927 (Comments: 2) | Sofia_111 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello. I understand your concerns, and maybe Dolphin Street and Peter Street (which are part of the larger pedestrian square around the church) should be removed to just local_name. Mary-le-Port Street is obviously a proposed name for its 'reins... commented 2026-10-01 20:17:17 UTC by Sofia_111 ♦5 |
| 189839283 (Comments: 1) | zb-gladwyne-mapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please note: DVRPC imagery is rarely the best imagery for a given location, given its 1ft tiles. Esri and Mapbox imagery both show the house much clearer - I aligned the building to the Mapbox imagery here. Also note: Most building... commented 2026-10-01 20:10:29 UTC by I-76 ♦87 |
| 189844900 (Comments: 1) | Tootsie_Roller (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. Op een voetpad hoef je geen foot=yes te taggen. Dat is default. Een officieel voetpad heeft meestal een G7 bord... commented 2026-10-01 20:10:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189844342 (Comments: 1) | Meesch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Meesch.. Fietshekjes staan meestal iet op een kruispunt. Op welk pad of weg staat het hekje? MVG eggie commented 2026-10-01 20:06:14 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189843819 (Comments: 1) | Meesch (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 20:02:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 186919616 (Comments: 1) | OSM-XXXXXX (Discussed changesets: 40) | Ratikan operaattori ei ole VR vaan Tampereen Raitiotie. Track_ref tarkoittaa raidenumeroa, jos sellainen on virallisesti määritelty. Tampereen Ratikalla näin ei ole. Päivitin tiedot vastaamaan todellisuutta. commented 2026-10-01 20:02:08 UTC by jplahti ♦22 |
| 189842997 (Comments: 1) | Steff D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 20:01:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189841475 (Comments: 1) | MegamindHQ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 20:00:21 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189839975 (Comments: 1) | Jonago (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 19:59:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189839941 (Comments: 1) | six apples (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 19:58:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
 | 189809861 (Comments: 2) | BenoitL (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sorry for the bus relations I thought I fixed them all. I'm not sure where the actual N6 is going to be. Part of it looks like it will be one way on the final plans (coming from the Cureghem bridge), and a bidirectional road in front of the L... commented 2026-10-01 19:55:21 UTC by BenoitL ♦5 |
| 189533208 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 12) | Üdv. Mi van pontosan kitáblázva ezen az átkelőn? A KRESZ szerint kijelölt kerékpárúton gyalogos csak akkor közlekedhet, ha nincs járda. A foot megadása szükségtelen: ... commented 2026-10-01 19:48:02 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189755130 (Comments: 1) | Samuel Desmarchais (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, par rapport à mon autre message, si tu veux améliorer les bâtiments existants, il ne faut pas faire des multipolygones mais des bâtiments avec des parties de bâtiments, cf. par exemple https://www.opens... commented 2026-10-01 19:42:36 UTC by Yunan973 ♦171 |
| 189666169 (Comments: 1) | SzilágyiGyula (Discussed changesets: 12) | Üdv. Ezek szerintem nem lakóterületi utak, hiszen ipartelepen vannak. commented 2026-10-01 19:41:32 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 99053149 (Comments: 1) | Milhouse (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thank you for your helpful work improving the map. The houses you added were modified in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108436662 and their numbers now look wrong so I have created https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5549950. commented 2026-10-01 19:40:59 UTC by tomhukins ♦303 |
| 108436662 (Comments: 2) | Maptapper (Discussed changesets: 28) | As you haven't replied yet I have create https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5549950 to track this problem. commented 2026-10-01 19:39:23 UTC by tomhukins ♦303 |
| 748530 (Comments: 3) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 87) | Wild! Looks like USGS got rid of it, so it's worth deleting here too. commented 2026-10-01 19:31:32 UTC by iandees ♦1,405 |
| 169116924 (Comments: 5) | TommyRobloxOfficial (Discussed changesets: 22) | Dom Paliona! commented 2026-10-01 19:29:50 UTC by -Hubert- ♦4 |
 | 189746656 (Comments: 1) | rhle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Did you read the wiki for this tag? It's not appropriate here; it has already been added where it needs to be commented 2026-10-01 19:26:23 UTC by Cele078 ♦14 |
| 189560884 (Comments: 2) | W3NET0wns (Discussed changesets: 32) | Nawet nie zauważyłem, że była tu dodana uwaga. commented 2026-10-01 19:12:35 UTC by W3NET0wns ♦22 |
| 189843037 (Comments: 1) | Doritos2020 (Discussed changesets: 3) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 (optional) #OpenStreetMap (optional) commented 2026-10-01 19:02:43 UTC by Doritos2020 ♦1 |
| 180479317 (Comments: 1) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 171) | highway=path ist hier eindeutig die falsche Lösung, da die Zufahrt durch die Krahnstraße (aus Richtung Bierstraße) für Anwohner, Taxen, Hotelgäste, Lieferanten und zu den Behindertenparkplätzen freigegeben ist. highway... commented 2026-10-01 18:55:30 UTC by N9713 ♦18 |
| 189509599 (Comments: 4) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thank you! I appreciate the assistance on this and the feedback. It is greatly appreciated. commented 2026-10-01 18:52:10 UTC by TransAct-JT ♦3 |
| 189824838 (Comments: 4) | ckmcc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed and updated the streets around commented 2026-10-01 18:35:31 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦550 |
| 185849373 (Comments: 2) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:24:26 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 185850135 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:24:14 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 189841090 (Comments: 1) | Suhbeena (Discussed changesets: 4) | #Maptober commented 2026-10-01 18:15:21 UTC by Suhbeena ♦6 |
| 189840917 (Comments: 1) | ToniE (Discussed changesets: 239) | ... ist kein shed, ... commented 2026-10-01 18:14:48 UTC by ToniE ♦1,288 |
| 186217099 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:14:22 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 189837846 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 325) | Ahoj, je to část v IDS JMK. commented 2026-10-01 18:05:49 UTC by mapperue ♦248 |
| 189803596 (Comments: 1) | qgmzmy (Discussed changesets: 6) | #31DayOSMChallenge #Maptober #Maptober2026 commented 2026-10-01 17:55:00 UTC by qgmzmy ♦10 |
| 189796501 (Comments: 2) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 28) | Je vais voir ce détail après le prochain survey. Je viens de corriger une erreur grave apparemment due à une cartographie faite sur base de Facebook et la création d'une zone shopping fictive. Merci de faire plus atte... commented 2026-10-01 17:44:55 UTC by 9_tab ♦156 |
| 189838766 (Comments: 2) | Molis83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voorlopig het ik het adres teruggezet. De BAG viewer ligt er momenteel uit. Kan het dus nu niet checken of het adres nog bestaat. MVG, eggie commented 2026-10-01 17:38:08 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189817675 (Comments: 1) | hiasl89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted. Es handelt sich um die Grenze des Postleitzahlgebiets, wie aus der Relation ersichtlich. commented 2026-10-01 17:35:38 UTC by wolfbert ♦200 |
| 189804598 (Comments: 3) | itineris (Discussed changesets: 80) | Köszönöm a választ! (Látom, közben az old_name is megváltozott.) commented 2026-10-01 17:34:42 UTC by Marton Ádám ♦4 |
| 189833994 (Comments: 1) | Kaan Isik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback .. Probeer svp het gebied van je edits klein te houden. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 17:32:47 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189828940 (Comments: 1) | 3sjah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 17:31:06 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189827370 (Comments: 1) | ikbenfrank4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 17:29:03 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189838260 (Comments: 1) | eric57890 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM! Why did you delete this residential area? Also please use more descriptive changeset comments. Best, Will commented 2026-10-01 17:28:20 UTC by willkmis ♦232 |
| 189819218 (Comments: 1) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Szia. Fentebb a Fő utcánál már jelölve volt. Ez milyen épület? Javasolnám inkább a StreetComplete (https://streetcomplete.app/) vagy Every Door (https://every-door.app/) appok használat&aacu... commented 2026-10-01 17:28:13 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
 | 189797975 (Comments: 2) | 0x4273 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi there. According to osm standard each tennis pitch should be mapped separately. In cases where imagery is too poor for the exact bounds to be confidently established usage of nodes is fine. A single way encompassing multiple pitches is incorrect. ... commented 2026-10-01 17:25:43 UTC by 0x4273 ♦3 |
| 165125067 (Comments: 5) | Wolfgang Holtz (Discussed changesets: 39) | Ein Issue ist wie ein Hinweis bei OSM. Und ja, der Rest ist ein wenig kompliziert. Ich mach einfach mal. https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/12901 commented 2026-10-01 17:25:18 UTC by kadiwa ♦146 |
| 189319313 (Comments: 4) | YourLocalEnbyMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | I see, thank you! commented 2026-10-01 17:14:59 UTC by YourLocalEnbyMapper ♦2 |
| 182093105 (Comments: 1) | aajahah (Discussed changesets: 1) | It was not quite rebuild the exact some way. The space where the restaurant and the hairdresser was removed. The current ESRI World Imagery is from during reconstruction, so I have made averaged GPS waypoints (< 1 meter between 2nd and 3rd revi... commented 2026-10-01 17:14:41 UTC by JohnnyGPS ♦7 |
| 148297795 (Comments: 1) | Qualhano (Discussed changesets: 49) | Olá, Qualhano, Eu estava revisando a rede de referência em Campos dos Goytacazes e notei que a BR-356 segue trajetos diferentes na *way* (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103563566) e na relação (https://www.openstr... commented 2026-10-01 17:01:45 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦85 |
 | 189823429 (Comments: 1) | Fame Dawud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fame Dawud and welcome to OpenStreetMap, I am guessing this was a test. Do not save tests to OSM. You can use CoMaps to add missing places to map but not tests. I am reverting this changeset as there is no fuel/filling station here. commented 2026-10-01 16:54:31 UTC by Enock4seth ♦685 |
| 134107619 (Comments: 1) | Khidistavi (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, the source link on way 1157199629 (Batumi–Khelvachauri boundary) is now dead. Near Gantiadi the line departs from NAPR's settlement borders by up to ~210 m. Do you remember what this section was based on? commented 2026-10-01 16:45:04 UTC by Comrade Bulkin ♦1 |
| 189792918 (Comments: 1) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | gelöscht mit gleicher Begründung wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189719239 commented 2026-10-01 16:40:37 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 188848156 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | I reverted the changeset. hope that helps save you the effort @btwhite92. @flappy next time consider being a bit more respectful and clean it up instead of asking someone else to do it for you. commented 2026-10-01 16:36:21 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦138 |
| 189830958 (Comments: 3) | Lightswitchr (Discussed changesets: 14) | @Lightswitchr: That was not the intention and I apologise if it came across as that way. The building is still standing and I don't believe it should be tagged as completely demolished yet. commented 2026-10-01 16:23:15 UTC by Aethonatic ♦93 |
| 185989984 (Comments: 2) | Reusedheadgasket (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at the 2026 aerial imagery from the county these ALPR's that you added in the middle of road are still not there on the aerial imagery, please double check their location with aerial imagery and fix the location. A ALPR being in the midd... commented 2026-10-01 16:20:41 UTC by Udarian ♦949 |
| 189834017 (Comments: 2) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 20) | The deletion of the node, I mean. commented 2026-10-01 16:16:26 UTC by Aethonatic ♦93 |
| 189817713 (Comments: 1) | michealcurran (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ceci n'est pas un hôtel. Reverted in changeset 189834260 commented 2026-10-01 16:06:55 UTC by schobbish ♦84 |
| 189775817 (Comments: 4) | LochnagarMountain (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi danieldegroot2, My sincere apologies; you are correct, I should have paid more attention to the recent history of this way and the comment from the prior changeset. I did remove the way based solely on Esri and the available Mapillary however t... commented 2026-10-01 16:01:12 UTC by LochnagarMountain ♦3 |
| 189698257 (Comments: 1) | Breaaad (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, die Anlagen sind noch nicht im Luftbild zu sehen, nur die alten abgeabuten (leider sind die Luftbilder in Bayern sehr alt). Die abgebauten Anlagen sollte man erst nach einiger Zeit löschen, bestenfalls wenn die gängingen Luftbilder aktu... commented 2026-10-01 16:01:09 UTC by onterof ♦70 |
| 189536339 (Comments: 6) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 87) | Klar ich hatte nur mir das ALKIS angeschaut und dann vor Ort es für plausibel gehalten da das quasi für jedermann zugängliche Bänke und Flächen sind. Und müssen Parks auf öffentlichem Grund sein? Ich finde nicht unb... commented 2026-10-01 15:49:30 UTC by stirps ♦65 |
| 189733273 (Comments: 2) | Daham (Discussed changesets: 19) | Die Ost- Kardinalleuchttonne auf Position 53°23,3940'N 006°57,4260'E wurde ersatzlos eingezogen. commented 2026-10-01 15:49:28 UTC by Daham ♦14 |
 | 174810560 (Comments: 2) | KarooDesert (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi foreigner037, Thanks for catching this! I’ll keep that policy in mind for future edits. commented 2026-10-01 15:39:28 UTC by KarooDesert ♦12 |
| 189830166 (Comments: 2) | janmb (Discussed changesets: 7) | Okay - du hast das von 50 auf 30 runtergestuft - und zwar dauerthaft - Bisher halt galt da eine reduktion nur 7-21 uhr und so war das eingetragen: Hier ein Bild aus Juni diesen Jahres: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=123149860561991... commented 2026-10-01 15:39:27 UTC by flohoff ♦2,599 |
| 189827974 (Comments: 1) | joost schouppe (Discussed changesets: 96) | Nog vergeten vermelden: de buitenste energiecentrale was gemapped als https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18024360 met slechts één way als lid. Dus die relatie verwijderd en de info op die ene way gezet commented 2026-10-01 15:39:01 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,559 |
| 154195010 (Comments: 3) | Lodda (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hi Lodda, I've already checked it out. There's no mini-golf course here, just a school grounds. Done. commented 2026-10-01 15:38:48 UTC by TG-map4 ♦32 |
| 170580003 (Comments: 4) | GanKonMalade (Discussed changesets: 6) | en effet.. dur a dire si ce point est vraiment pertinent, il est tel quel dans la BAN, je vais le signaler car effectivement il n'y a pas l'air d'avoir grand chose commented 2026-10-01 15:37:44 UTC by GanKonMalade ♦10 |
| 189750391 (Comments: 5) | Cowboy79 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Danke fürs Anpassen commented 2026-10-01 15:37:12 UTC by aixbrick ♦941 |
| 184630652 (Comments: 3) | GanKonMalade (Discussed changesets: 6) | Je pense que c'est juste la BD topo qui n'a pas ete mise a jour, j'ai utilise l outil de signalement de la BAN sur cette rue , on verra bien la reponse... si il y en a une. commented 2026-10-01 15:35:15 UTC by GanKonMalade ♦10 |
| 189831032 (Comments: 1) | Fabricio Lima (Discussed changesets: 7) | O que seria "maps"? commented 2026-10-01 15:24:58 UTC by Lucas_semK ♦4 |
| 189197830 (Comments: 1) | brodzio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey ! Merci de la contribution. Comme le site internet de refuges.info n'est pas le site internet officiel du refuge, je pense que la clé "website" n'est pas appropriée. Il semble y avoir une clé "ref:... commented 2026-10-01 15:17:03 UTC by EpicKiwi ♦1 |
 | 189799922 (Comments: 2) | jptolosa (Discussed changesets: 75) | Buen día, en Openstreetmap los glaciares de roca se mapean como natural=scree + geological=rock_glacier. La etiqueta natural=glacier se utiliza para los glaciares típicos de montaña o de valle. Ver acá: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-10-01 15:16:36 UTC by jptolosa ♦249 |
| 66300578 (Comments: 1) | MosKartograf (Discussed changesets: 36) | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5549533 ? commented 2026-10-01 15:13:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189819810 (Comments: 1) | Jan Derk (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Jan, Beter geen adressen op de gebouwomtrek zetten. er is een adresnode. Ik heb het adres verwijderd.(incompleet) MVG eggie commented 2026-10-01 15:11:12 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189755446 (Comments: 1) | Samuel Desmarchais (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, peux tu éviter de détruite des bâtiments corrects en les remplaçant par des multipolygones erronés ? Ta relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21461173/history#map=19/44.253873/1.76410... commented 2026-10-01 15:05:03 UTC by Yunan973 ♦171 |
| 189829722 (Comments: 1) | rubenk42 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Ruben, Nooit naar de daken kijken. Daar staat het gebouw niet. Een luchtfoto is vaak schuin genomen. Ik heb het gebouw uitgelijnd mbv de BGT. Het lijkt verkeerd, maar het klopt precies. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-01 15:02:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189826271 (Comments: 2) | SophiaAstraea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank voor de tips Groetjes, Sophie commented 2026-10-01 15:01:53 UTC by SophiaAstraea ♦1 |
| 189822509 (Comments: 1) | CantFindASeat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your survey of house numbers, really useful stuff. When you encounter a mapped "house" which should actually be more than one house... rather than adding multiple numbers e.g. 2-4, could you either split the house into two... commented 2026-10-01 14:59:04 UTC by LateNightTone ♦94 |
| 189827878 (Comments: 1) | rubenk42 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Volgens de website hoort niet de plaatsnaam achter de naam. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:56:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189825044 (Comments: 1) | woohuanghp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:52:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189822048 (Comments: 1) | punkinthehall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:51:38 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189821280 (Comments: 1) | Jobjuhh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:50:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189820730 (Comments: 1) | Max Maton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:49:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189819920 (Comments: 1) | Fiat van der Laan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:48:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 187013742 (Comments: 1) | Palary (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Palary, this changeset turned 1200 East (way 1323881874) round, so it became one-way north. With it one-way north, there was no legal way south on 1200 East there, so routing (including CVTD Cache Valley Transit District bus route 15) went round t... commented 2026-10-01 14:47:32 UTC by Sytys ♦10 |
| 189818653 (Comments: 1) | HSchutrups (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Format phone aangepast naar +31... MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:46:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189818026 (Comments: 1) | esquire900 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-10-01 14:44:14 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189819553 (Comments: 1) | Bierphysik (Discussed changesets: 28) | Falls noch nicht bekannt: Mit der basemap.at Oberfläche lassen sich Objekte oft genauer ausrichten: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bayern-ab-01-01-2023-sind-viele-geobasisdaten-der-vermessungsverwaltung-kosten-frei-verfugbar-nutzbarkei... commented 2026-10-01 14:42:54 UTC by martinst ♦417 |
| 189821589 (Comments: 1) | Aditya1382 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kalau nama jembatan, pakai label bridge:name=Jembatan Drojo. Label name=* itu untuk nama jalannya. commented 2026-10-01 14:37:34 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189777455 (Comments: 5) | Stephen Lorié (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi... Er gaat bij OSM niemand over de goedkeuring. 😀 Het lijkt me oke. Formeel zou het ook building=roof layer=1 kunnen zijn. Overkappingen komen niet met de Kadaster import mee. Groet, eggie commented 2026-10-01 14:36:13 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 188406509 (Comments: 1) | vb98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao. Per favore, non attaccare i landuse alle strade. Grazie. commented 2026-10-01 14:34:50 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,542 |
| 189815087 (Comments: 1) | KylesWeb-ID (Discussed changesets: 6) | Terimakasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan koreksi letak bangunan menambahkan jalan/bangunan menghapus jalan/bangunan<... commented 2026-10-01 14:34:07 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189812650 (Comments: 1) | Alban Plumbing and Heating Ltd- St Albans (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, only on the ground truth, verifiable by anyone passing by is allowed in the OSM database. This POI node is situated on the side of a street and the address is incomplete. The company office is in Sutton, not here. Can you say where the bus... commented 2026-10-01 14:28:43 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,387 |
| 175188258 (Comments: 1) | _klaas_ (Discussed changesets: 19) | Moin aus Wildeshausen! Ich bin in den letzten Tagen an einigen Strommasten der Leitung LH-14-326 vorbeigekommen, die hier https://www.osm.org/way/1454099628 erfasst ist. Du hast die von power=line auf power=construction geändert. Wird da noch... commented 2026-10-01 14:26:46 UTC by GerdP ♦2,876 |
| 189825124 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Vandalism commented 2026-10-01 14:22:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189826917 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Vandalism commented 2026-10-01 14:21:24 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189827345 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Vandalism commented 2026-10-01 14:20:02 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189825566 (Comments: 1) | تكسي طلي (Discussed changesets: 10) | Vandalism commented 2026-10-01 14:19:05 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189813707 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 124) | End of a true era of OSM 🫡 commented 2026-10-01 14:11:33 UTC by 0235 ♦53 |
| 189821552 (Comments: 3) | Heidler (Discussed changesets: 1) | korrekter Link: https//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F commented 2026-10-01 14:03:28 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,277 |
 | 189826568 (Comments: 1) | yitimox (Discussed changesets: 7) | Havaist hat verileri çok eskide kalmış. Çoğu hattın güncel durak ve güzergah detaylarına göre yeniden çizilmesi gereklidir commented 2026-10-01 14:03:27 UTC by yitimox ♦46 |
| 187360165 (Comments: 1) | LeX Rooster (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi LeX Rooster :). Hier scheint ein Bahngleis dupliziert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549184578/history. Es ist mit höherem Layer über dem regulären Gleis. commented 2026-10-01 14:01:12 UTC by kartograph ♦39 |
| 189826398 (Comments: 1) | Nakaner-repair (Discussed changesets: 462) | Accidentially uploaded without proper changeset comment. It should have the comment: "Revert changeset 189821552 due to vandalism. Access tags were present. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F" commented 2026-10-01 14:01:11 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,277 |
 | 189803629 (Comments: 1) | spacetime_786 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset left broken borders, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16117507#map=13/31.54899/74.32826 because you deleted one way. Will you fix this? commented 2026-10-01 13:52:49 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦87 |
 | 189773883 (Comments: 2) | s8321414 (Discussed changesets: 21) | @Supaplex 看了一下，中文維基百科的地址是寫東吉村，我先寫東吉村好了 commented 2026-10-01 13:39:20 UTC by s8321414 ♦7 |
| 189815304 (Comments: 1) | efolgado (Discussed changesets: 3) | Buenas, Las calles peatonales (highway=pedestrian) aplican principalmente en zonas urbanas, siendo más adecuado highway=footway para los senderos o caminos interurbanos. Además, donde has añadido el camino ya existen unas ... commented 2026-10-01 13:32:00 UTC by marcmarti ♦110 |
| 189817989 (Comments: 1) | LochnagarMountain (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey LochnagarMountain, Please do not continue mapping until you have replied to comments on your changeset at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189775817 Regards, Daniel commented 2026-10-01 13:16:15 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦747 |
| 189823782 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 481) | (forgot to mention it but source=local_knowledge) commented 2026-10-01 13:14:10 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,884 |
| 189809564 (Comments: 1) | u915 (Discussed changesets: 1) | level=2 likely a mistake. For the purpose of consistency and automated processing levels are preferably numbered starting from 0 regardless of how they are commonly numbered and named in local language. So in a 2 storey building level=0 and level=1. ... commented 2026-10-01 13:00:10 UTC by kaposts ♦26 |
| 186275678 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:58 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 186458827 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:49 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 186854709 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:15 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 186511222 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:08 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 186511084 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:02 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 187791702 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:57:35 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 189822643 (Comments: 1) | kamstut (Discussed changesets: 1) | I also remove a "service road", which doesn't actually exist. Its the perimeter of my neighbors property and covered in regular old grass. Not a drive, not a road, just yard. commented 2026-10-01 12:56:44 UTC by kamstut ♦1 |
 | 189516169 (Comments: 1) | evyy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Grammatic correction: "Added paths and all remaining sand traps" commented 2026-10-01 12:50:11 UTC by evyy ♦8 |
| 189807285 (Comments: 1) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Vai varētu paskaidrot, kāpēc no https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563685243 tika izņemts surface=unpaved? commented 2026-10-01 12:45:00 UTC by markalex- ♦47 |
| 189821394 (Comments: 2) | TheCatInABox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gotcha, thanks! commented 2026-10-01 12:43:21 UTC by TheCatInABox ♦1 |
| 189802959 (Comments: 1) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Elias Rogge, bevor Du weitere Änderungen machst: Kannst Du bitte erstmal antworten, woher die Informationen stammen? Gruß Roger Wilco commented 2026-10-01 12:40:28 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 |
| 189821725 (Comments: 1) | Francesco Zanaboni (Discussed changesets: 23) | Modifiche limitate alla zona del porto di Cremona, area del changeset ampia per una modifica ad alcuni punti della riserva naturale commented 2026-10-01 12:39:10 UTC by Francesco Zanaboni ♦37 |
| 189778772 (Comments: 1) | opensourcefriend (Discussed changesets: 4) | Guten Tag, wenn dort wirklich inzwischen durchgehend (Tag und Nacht) Tempo 30 gilt, dann kann das "maxspeed:conditional=30 @ (22:00-06:00)" entfernt werden. Viele Grüße whb commented 2026-10-01 12:33:59 UTC by whb ♦669 |
| 189796765 (Comments: 1) | CarlosIllesca (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Buen trabajo. Eso sí lo adapté para seguir las convenciones y agregué un par de datos más según el SII. Saludos commented 2026-10-01 12:33:45 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 186870679 (Comments: 3) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi Alew W2, thank you for making the corrections and reaching out to me regarding the issue. While combining the designated HOV lane with the motorway, I carried over the existing tags to the merged section. I see and understand the effect of the tol... commented 2026-10-01 12:31:24 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦44 |
| 189755661 (Comments: 4) | World_Winner (Discussed changesets: 42) | Thank you for the quick fix. I have removed a turn restriction that was no longer adequate and prevented turning right from "Nagolder Straße" into "Horber Straße". One last nit-pick: you have added both |
| 189768887 (Comments: 2) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi Pete Owens, my mapping activity at the location solely involved modifications on way 1563658339, which was flagged for review due to being a very short road segment. No other changes that would affect the connectivity were made as part of my edit ... commented 2026-10-01 12:29:38 UTC by Gorger ♦60 |
| 188856918 (Comments: 1) | Nordpfeil (Discussed changesets: 78) | Hallo Nordpfeil, irgendwo in unseren Webseiten zum Thema automatisiertes Editieren steht sinngemäß: "Wenn jemand ein Pferd mit animal=kow taggt und jemand anders repariert das dann auf animal=cow, wird es dadurch nicht besser." |
 | 189821217 (Comments: 1) | Le99 (Discussed changesets: 5) | source was ESRI; tagged source has clouds commented 2026-10-01 12:26:22 UTC by Le99 ♦6 |
| 180231230 (Comments: 34) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 130) | ... and for the avoidance of doubt, the question here is not "are people allowed to cycle along pavements (in OSM terms highway=footway; footway=sidewalk)". Everyone, bar the "rogue cyclist" at the top of https://community.openst... commented 2026-10-01 12:24:56 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,884 |
| X | 189587945 (Comments: 2) | StamppotAndijvie (Discussed changesets: 5) | NAMOBJ is an artefact from the borders of the desa that slipped through, used by geoservices.big.go.id. commented 2026-10-01 12:21:03 UTC by StamppotAndijvie ♦1 |
| 189449606 (Comments: 1) | Ste_Nova (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Ste_Nova, Can I ask why you have added the amenity=school tag back onto Ruthin School when it closed in July 2026 [1] and the site is now up for sale [2]. Your changeset comment of "details" is insufficient to explain why you have ... commented 2026-10-01 12:19:50 UTC by JezCrow ♦180 |
| 189241505 (Comments: 3) | Tunibal (Discussed changesets: 18) | I know, I think OSM bugged at this point. commented 2026-10-01 12:03:51 UTC by Tunibal ♦10 |
| 189797088 (Comments: 1) | jarinsy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189819598 commented 2026-10-01 11:55:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189591509 (Comments: 1) | StamppotAndijvie (Discussed changesets: 5) | what's you judgement for converting all place from hamlet → neighbourhood? commented 2026-10-01 11:50:07 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189551777 (Comments: 1) | RV Fisherman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, what does opening-hours:signed-in mean? You can enter with a membership card? commented 2026-10-01 11:49:13 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
 | 189659125 (Comments: 1) | M3lvin (Discussed changesets: 2) | ini bukan kampung, kan commented 2026-10-01 11:42:45 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189659362 (Comments: 1) | M3lvin (Discussed changesets: 2) | ini bukan kampung, kan commented 2026-10-01 11:42:19 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189743929 (Comments: 4) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 54) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21371 commented 2026-10-01 11:41:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189365636 (Comments: 4) | Martin Borsje (Discussed changesets: 176) | Well, numbering of hairpins in climbs is done im more places, as well of markers where they put altitude and grade for the next kilometer; that information is for tourists or other recreational users. But I am fine if you transfer it to curve:ref=*,... commented 2026-10-01 11:29:14 UTC by Martin Borsje ♦759 |
| 189812760 (Comments: 1) | Dexterdy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Je info heb ik samengevoegd met het bestaande adres. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-10-01 11:22:18 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
 | 189699861 (Comments: 6) | Matti109 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sæll, LMÍ hættu að taka loftmyndir af Íslandi upp úr síðustu aldamótum. Þá taka Loftmyndir ehf. við keflinu. LMÍ er þó núna farið að taka lo... commented 2026-10-01 11:18:17 UTC by Kerploonk ♦23 |
| 189775073 (Comments: 1) | kevinmcg (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356901405/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549592109/ The geometry of the school and youth centre are distorted. commented 2026-10-01 11:12:09 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,269 |
| 189815183 (Comments: 1) | scacciase (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, why did you delete these ways in Civitano del Sannio? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=189815183#map=18/41.668947/14.404418 They clearly exist in both the authoritative Abruzzo Orto '18 and in Mapbox'26. Let me know, poste h... commented 2026-10-01 11:10:14 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,528 |
| 189800692 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 54) | thank you! commented 2026-10-01 11:03:12 UTC by cswilson252 ♦28 |
| 181543614 (Comments: 4) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 377) | Var det dig selv, der startede med at tilføje en hæk? osmviborg ændrede det så på et tidspunkt til et hegn, men senere tilbage til en hæk igen. Altså som jeg forstår historikken. commented 2026-10-01 10:56:30 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦151 |
| 171244107 (Comments: 3) | Marion_Moseby (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your answer. The tagging was wrong as it is not a memorial. I have fixed it. Regards commented 2026-10-01 10:52:38 UTC by kapazao ♦1,045 |
| 189530152 (Comments: 1) | asokuria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Precisely what strettview photos did you use here? As far as I am aware there is no allowed streetlevel imagery available from which to make this edit. Cheers Phil commented 2026-10-01 10:43:11 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,827 |
| 182927258 (Comments: 1) | mapl (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo mapl, ich habe die Relation gefunden und schreibe dich an, weil du offensichtlich in jüngerer Zeit am meisten daran gearbeitet hast. Wie es aussieht versuchst du, die recht große Relation in kleinere zu zerlegen. Im Landkreis Weil... commented 2026-10-01 10:37:53 UTC by santon ♦50 |
| 189785135 (Comments: 1) | Tyoma14 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Исправил с правильного на неправильное. Вот тут описано соглашение: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Numbered_Lanes Откатываю commented 2026-10-01 10:36:53 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189795464 (Comments: 1) | PatnosD (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fixed the name and phone format commented 2026-10-01 10:33:04 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189795671 (Comments: 1) | PatnosD (Discussed changesets: 3) | I fixed the name and phone format. Please have a look commented 2026-10-01 10:32:04 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189795784 (Comments: 1) | PatnosD (Discussed changesets: 3) | The name in Georgia should be in Georgian. For English or latin name use the name:en tag. I've fixed in this case commented 2026-10-01 10:29:54 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 154175989 (Comments: 2) | Heiner Einer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Der Kommentar ist zwar nun schon fast 2 Jahre alt, aber die Begründung für deine Ergänzung @Heiner Einer würde mich auch interessieren! Nicht auf einen Kommentar zu reagieren ist hier in OSM nicht die feine englische Art. commented 2026-10-01 10:24:11 UTC by BrummsLee ♦68 |
| 189807331 (Comments: 1) | Synnovebr (Discussed changesets: 1) | It IS forbidden* commented 2026-10-01 10:09:18 UTC by Synnovebr ♦1 |
 | 188643425 (Comments: 2) | AhmedMohamedAli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry for the late reply, Mueschel. I'm new here and I've never checked my "Notifications" page or the comments before. I only knew when someone sent me a private message, because a green "1" number shows up so I know so... commented 2026-10-01 10:03:50 UTC by AhmedMohamedAli ♦3 |
| 171656942 (Comments: 1) | Bem Mapas (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13128788113 is it OK to delete it now? commented 2026-10-01 10:01:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188030920 (Comments: 2) | AhmedMohamedAli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you Salma. commented 2026-10-01 09:58:24 UTC by AhmedMohamedAli ♦3 |
| 189807333 (Comments: 1) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Mint korábban is írtam, jelezve volt már a gyógyszertár. commented 2026-10-01 09:55:30 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 188980222 (Comments: 1) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 69) | No to już budowa ruszyła. https://s74-lagow-opatow.gddkia.gov.pl/aktualnosci/ commented 2026-10-01 09:52:46 UTC by forgelang ♦1 |
| 187773898 (Comments: 2) | AhmedMohamedAli (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry for the late reply, VLD0251. I'm new here and I've never checked my "Notifications" page or the comments before. I only knew when someone sent me a private message, because a green "1" number shows up so I know som... commented 2026-10-01 09:51:19 UTC by AhmedMohamedAli ♦3 |
| 189811790 (Comments: 1) | JL5858 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wow! Sehr geil! Danke für diesen Beitrag! commented 2026-10-01 09:36:48 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦72 |
| 189810429 (Comments: 1) | mjr13 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Terimakasih untuk kontribusinya, namun alangkah baiknya tiap perubahan sebelum submit, kamu beri deskripsi sedikit apa yang diubah. Contoh: Koreksi geometri jalan koreksi letak bangunan menambahkan jalan/bangunan menghapus jalan/banguna... commented 2026-10-01 09:27:41 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189144507 (Comments: 2) | luk323 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Dankeschön für den Tipp! Ich denke auch, das der Turm leider vermutlich abgerissen wird, da wichtige Streben angefault sind und der Turm ohnehin nicht groß genug ist, um einen guten Blick über die Bäume zu bekommen. commented 2026-10-01 09:27:39 UTC by luk323 ♦23 |
| 182047464 (Comments: 1) | Afribit Africa BCE (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Please stick to the Bitcoin tags as outlined in our wiki's like: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Verifying-Existing-Merchants Happy mapping, Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-10-01 09:19:16 UTC by Comino ♦416 |
| 187629043 (Comments: 2) | KseniyaChykun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and sorry I couldn’t answer earlier. Yes, the removal of the highway=track tag was intentional. When reviewing the latest available satellite imagery, I couldn’t see this road in that area. I also noticed that the mapped way cro... commented 2026-10-01 09:15:59 UTC by KseniyaChykun ♦1 |
| 104261545 (Comments: 2) | TUBSmail (Discussed changesets: 17) | Yes. That's s stop for school busses only. There's no sign, no hit, no nothing. The "Gesamtschule Rödinghausen" falls this stop officially like that though. To disembark, theyll bus stops before the gate when the gate is clo... commented 2026-10-01 09:04:00 UTC by TUBSmail ♦3 |
| 189730479 (Comments: 1) | MALVIN ALRAFIF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Suntingan ini telah dipulihkan. Harap ikuti tutorial interaktifnya commented 2026-10-01 08:25:31 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189753562 (Comments: 1) | Tobi Ferdianto (Discussed changesets: 1) | titik apa? commented 2026-10-01 08:20:53 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189761811 (Comments: 1) | BitcoinMakueni 🇰🇪 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap... commented 2026-10-01 08:14:18 UTC by Comino ♦416 |
| 189713839 (Comments: 2) | BDP-CHUMTP (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, C'est exactement ça que je souhaiter faire, merci de votre intervention. Bonne journée. Cordialement, commented 2026-10-01 07:29:03 UTC by BDP-CHUMTP ♦1 |
| 189769167 (Comments: 8) | Bosburger (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 commented 2026-10-01 07:15:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189743328 (Comments: 1) | 2Thomas97 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189806131 commented 2026-10-01 06:56:39 UTC by kmpoppe ♦102 |
| 189688272 (Comments: 5) | gelkins4 (Discussed changesets: 1) | > "I honestly don't want any of this on the map" In that case it's best to contact the map provider directly with your request. commented 2026-10-01 06:48:55 UTC by Mashin ♦607 |
| 189727257 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for mor... commented 2026-10-01 06:42:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189726798 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-10-01 06:39:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189739260 (Comments: 2) | MXC48 (Discussed changesets: 5) | You're welcome, I try to keep the Corsican data as up to date as possible (the only regular contributor here). So when I saw your note and the number of buildings to add, I rolled up my sleeves :) commented 2026-10-01 06:32:27 UTC by MXC48 ♦5 |
| 189803268 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 10) | You've been asked many times over the past >week to please properly (or at all) explain your edits and deletions of existing objects instead of no source=* and nonsense changeset comments, and particularly as a SEO account with a financial in... commented 2026-10-01 06:28:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189573166 (Comments: 2) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted due to continued mapping with zero response to any changeset comments in changeset 189805033 commented 2026-10-01 06:23:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189774343 (Comments: 2) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 92) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189803500 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189774343 commented 2026-10-01 06:20:42 UTC by Frank Peng ♦237 |
| 189800291 (Comments: 1) | Wimmm777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Hier staat nog helemaal niets. Ik zal het bedrijf samenvoegen met de adresnode op de juiste locatie. MVG eggie commented 2026-10-01 06:20:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189794553 (Comments: 3) | Rtromeds (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Thanks for the quick response. I've amended the tagging as per OSM practice and your changes. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-10-01 06:06:52 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,387 |
| 187275366 (Comments: 2) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 4) | I reverted this change and added weight limit instead as it's shown on sign https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189804402 commented 2026-10-01 06:03:35 UTC by markalex- ♦47 |
| 189754607 (Comments: 1) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 4) | What you did here is wrong: adding new road segment on top of existing one doesn't limit routers, as they still can use old road segments "underneath". But also, please, stop adding service=driveway to roads that are clearly not a d... commented 2026-10-01 05:51:44 UTC by markalex- ♦47 |
| 189794812 (Comments: 2) | Rtromeds (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you commented 2026-10-01 05:48:17 UTC by Rtromeds ♦2 |
| 189803781 (Comments: 1) | ljc_jlyb (Discussed changesets: 28) | 因未能及时保存更改，实际包括沈阳苏家屯区中央大街相关改动 commented 2026-10-01 05:37:49 UTC by ljc_jlyb ♦62 |
| 189803500 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 34) | Another mapper had already removed the highway=primary tag on Way 33300230 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33300230) before this revert edit was made. commented 2026-10-01 05:32:22 UTC by Frank Peng ♦237 |
| 163703958 (Comments: 1) | YoungCR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548601 ? is node/3708215513/history really also a bus stop? commented 2026-10-01 04:42:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189800465 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 68) | The layer=-1 tag should not be on ways 20357252 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20357252) and 1563950444 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563950444) as those roads are on ground level and not crossing over other features or below ground level. ... commented 2026-10-01 04:38:38 UTC by Frank Peng ♦237 |
| 189713869 (Comments: 1) | erul2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189800870 commented 2026-10-01 04:16:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189714322 (Comments: 1) | MapperTim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189800721 commented 2026-10-01 04:15:47 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189709422 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189800540 commented 2026-10-01 04:15:17 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189799566 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 68) | No landuse was adjusted in this changeset. You just mapped those residential areas. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189799566 commented 2026-10-01 04:14:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦237 |
| 189704901 (Comments: 1) | lucrobman101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787428 commented 2026-10-01 04:14:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189708120 (Comments: 1) | 徳太郎 佐野 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787218 commented 2026-10-01 04:14:09 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189714236 (Comments: 1) | RikuNoUki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189786839 commented 2026-10-01 04:13:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189715521 (Comments: 1) | firdavs11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189786371 commented 2026-10-01 04:13:06 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189730296 (Comments: 1) | Tri Vuong (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189770734 commented 2026-10-01 04:12:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189728297 (Comments: 1) | Nexus Labs AI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189770220 commented 2026-10-01 04:11:57 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189703837 (Comments: 1) | Hawbs729 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189770011 commented 2026-10-01 04:11:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189726305 (Comments: 1) | ALESSANDRAHERMINIO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189769921 commented 2026-10-01 04:10:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189708407 (Comments: 1) | Mani Kumar Reddy Kancharla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189764667 commented 2026-10-01 04:10:00 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189720015 (Comments: 1) | potaemnyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189761414 commented 2026-10-01 04:09:29 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189732334 (Comments: 1) | AnnisaSalma17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189760675 commented 2026-10-01 04:09:04 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189700606 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Macia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189754983 commented 2026-10-01 04:07:37 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189656721 (Comments: 1) | Anizio (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189754384 commented 2026-10-01 04:06:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189673733 (Comments: 1) | Svilen Stanchev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189741386 commented 2026-10-01 04:06:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189691289 (Comments: 1) | SUJIROKIMIMAME (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189724256 commented 2026-10-01 04:05:58 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189689154 (Comments: 1) | dcWallin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189723236 commented 2026-10-01 04:05:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189689850 (Comments: 1) | AshAIXD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189722345 commented 2026-10-01 04:04:55 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189672119 (Comments: 1) | closerthanmost (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189719159 commented 2026-10-01 04:04:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189683293 (Comments: 1) | WTon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189756348 commented 2026-10-01 04:03:04 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189700032 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Macia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189756512 commented 2026-10-01 04:02:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189691982 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Macia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757529 commented 2026-10-01 04:01:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189657304 (Comments: 1) | Davis Gallegos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757825 commented 2026-10-01 04:00:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189662286 (Comments: 2) | ShonkyCH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189759278 commented 2026-10-01 04:00:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189776349 (Comments: 1) | Heo Tham An (Discussed changesets: 8) | Các cầu trên tuyến cao tốc phải được đặt layer=2 thay vì layer=1, bạn để ý kỹ nhé, và các tuyến cao tốc khác commented 2026-10-01 03:34:16 UTC by ZioDragon ♦30 |
 | 189775808 (Comments: 1) | พเนจร (Discussed changesets: 6) | (การแปลด้วยคอมพิวเตอร์) สวัสดี ดูเหมือนว่าคุณได้เพิ่มประเทศที่ไม่จำเป็นและแท็ก addr:country จำ... commented 2026-10-01 03:07:41 UTC by Joel Koen ♦93 |
| 189797478 (Comments: 1) | yoisho2734_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | こんにちは、積極的な活動ありがとうございます。 Plateauデータのインポートにあたって、2点ほどお願い事項をメッセージで送らせていただきました。 お手数をおかけします... commented 2026-10-01 02:49:08 UTC by nyampire ♦203 |
| 143415735 (Comments: 1) | muchichka_s (Discussed changesets: 53) | бред . я народжений в радянському союзі і не зусстрічав ніколи у виданної в Україні пресі російською таких перекладів Друге - порушення... commented 2026-10-01 02:42:49 UTC by pztu ♦3 |
| 189615383 (Comments: 2) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 3) | I understand; however, my thought process was: the link roads coming from/going to 378 Spur will only ever see as much traffic as the spur itself, and therefore should not be classified any higher. Also, the intersection is less cluttered the way I d... commented 2026-10-01 02:33:08 UTC by Asa Foreman ♦3 |
| 187306219 (Comments: 1) | CoolMan00541 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi CoolMan, Have you seen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions ? Because of the unusual way that street addresses work here in Utah, we have a dedicated wiki page to explain that, even though a local may read this addres... commented 2026-10-01 02:27:47 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦149 |
| 189745945 (Comments: 1) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 13) | I see the note you left on the trailhead, and you're absolutely right! That is bad form! Even if you can't find it spelled all the way out as "500 South" in any official materials, that doesn't mean it's not an abbreviat... commented 2026-10-01 02:22:16 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦149 |
| 189743080 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 92) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189799546 commented 2026-10-01 01:34:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189735851 (Comments: 1) | malums_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189798838 commented 2026-10-01 00:45:48 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189796681 (Comments: 4) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 10) | Seems like an oversight on the bike streets implementation side, shouldn’t have to alter the main database for it. Just don’t want to overly fragment things on OSM and slow down editing commented 2026-10-01 00:43:50 UTC by cstromw ♦7 |
| 189732609 (Comments: 1) | Tri Vuong (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189798717 commented 2026-10-01 00:35:00 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189742187 (Comments: 1) | Gage Maxwell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189798549 commented 2026-10-01 00:22:17 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
 | 189795971 (Comments: 1) | chafe619 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, eliminaste la esquina. Para quitar el semáforo se elimina solo la etiqueta, no el nodo. Revertí el cambio y quité el semáforo. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, podés contactarte con l... commented 2026-10-01 00:20:40 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 85435980 (Comments: 2) | TsukuMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | since the change is 6 years old i don't remember why i did it that way, so it was probably a typo. i've fixed it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189798454 commented 2026-10-01 00:17:09 UTC by TsukuMap ♦1 |
| 189787641 (Comments: 1) | marcomir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por la información. Revisé los cambios, entiendo que solo agregaste un nodo para poder poner el comentario en el conjunto de cambios? Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, podés contactarte con la comun... commented 2026-10-01 00:16:08 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 189793187 (Comments: 1) | germanchelo1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, ¿Por qué eliminaste este landuse? Los otros que creaste no son residential=urban, porque significa que hay torres de departamentos. Deshice los cambios. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, podés contac... commented 2026-10-01 00:12:40 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 189175227 (Comments: 2) | blacx (Discussed changesets: 22) | si, selecciona la capa ICGC provisional commented 2026-10-01 00:09:51 UTC by blacx ♦88 |
| 189796387 (Comments: 1) | GullibleMappazo (Discussed changesets: 25) | i meant pois it autocorrected to lois for some reason commented 2026-09-30 23:47:32 UTC by GullibleMappazo ♦16 |
| 189499706 (Comments: 2) | enterprise1995 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Für jedenfalls die umfassende Platzgeometrie scheidet highway=pedestrian definitionsgemäß aus. Genau genommen bleibt da auch nicht viel als zu Fuß begebarer Platzbereich. commented 2026-09-30 23:22:39 UTC by enterprise1995 ♦11 |
| 189385321 (Comments: 2) | JoWa93 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, ich wollte auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1563922468 verlinken, nicht auf den Changeset. commented 2026-09-30 22:50:39 UTC by rohieb ♦175 |
 | 180106451 (Comments: 4) | Filip009CZ (Discussed changesets: 18) | Na dátach nebolo uvedené, kto trasu prevádzkuje. Väčšina trás je v správe miestneho SCK. Občas majú cyklotrasy v správe aj miestne skupiny. Preto som na nové trasy pridával ... commented 2026-09-30 22:41:47 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦53 |
| 189716388 (Comments: 1) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wo soll der sein? Ich war da und konnte ihn nicht finden. commented 2026-09-30 22:35:19 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 |
| 126436408 (Comments: 1) | joe2812 (Discussed changesets: 59) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10040209160/history/1 does this actually exist as place name? commented 2026-09-30 22:21:29 UTC by 9_tab ♦156 |
| 189795896 (Comments: 1) | draaglom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for noting this. For private roads, it's better to use access=private rather than access=no means no access to any mode of transport. That's not your fault, the wording in the iD editor is a little... commented 2026-09-30 22:18:42 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,940 |
| 188909733 (Comments: 8) | Scout Jens (Discussed changesets: 130) | Aus meiner Sicht passt es jetzt. Schließen kann ich hier nichts, Changeset-Kommentare kann man nur einschlafen lassen. Aber hier in diesem Wald mit den vielen MTB-Trails werden wir wahrscheinlich auch in Zukunft noch Diskussion führen. Die... commented 2026-09-30 22:07:40 UTC by george1201 ♦343 |
| 189763975 (Comments: 1) | Ankarfeer (Discussed changesets: 1) | You're doing great work, thank you! commented 2026-09-30 21:54:03 UTC by Seyruun ♦32 |
| 159206478 (Comments: 1) | Fifco1 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zdravim, podla coho je dokola celeho Namestia hrdinov cesta 1514? Je tam na mieste nejake take znacenie? Lebo podla dostupnych zdrojov napr. ZBGIS je 1514 len na juznej strane namestia. Ale je fakt, ze je to jednosmerka, takze chybal by opacny sme... commented 2026-09-30 21:50:34 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,046 |
| 186947963 (Comments: 1) | Probertp (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ahoj, tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299622075) si imho nespravne zmenil sidewalk=right na sidewalk:both=no. Ja tam chodnik po lavej strane cesty vidim... commented 2026-09-30 21:47:40 UTC by Tomas_J ♦426 |
| 113098909 (Comments: 1) | KosutM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zdar, existencia tohoto chodniku (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803314091) uz bola raz v minulosti vyznaceny na prilahlej ceste tagom sidewalk=left. Ty si ho vyznacil ako samostatnu liniu dupliticne k vyssie uvedenemu. Opravil som. Daj v buducnos... commented 2026-09-30 21:41:47 UTC by Tomas_J ♦426 |
 | 184865899 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 358) | building=service is for utlities like power. Maybe building=office for an office building would be more fitting? Feel free to change it yourself. commented 2026-09-30 21:29:53 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦747 |
| 189239791 (Comments: 4) | datainazwa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Maybe so, but OSM is NOT the place to lodge your protest! commented 2026-09-30 21:17:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
 | 189389504 (Comments: 2) | Robert Ancell (Discussed changesets: 9) | I couldn't decide if using the slash (as it is written on a scorecard) or an underscore (which might not make it clear this is a scorecard for a mixed colour scorecard). I see taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys... commented 2026-09-30 21:17:16 UTC by Robert Ancell ♦10 |
| 189794608 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 131) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189726715, 189792005. commented 2026-09-30 21:15:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189726715 (Comments: 1) | Banano boarding (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189794608 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits commented 2026-09-30 21:15:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189792005 (Comments: 2) | Banano boarding (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189794608 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits commented 2026-09-30 21:15:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189793535 (Comments: 4) | danieldebari (Discussed changesets: 7) | Precies.. selecteer de BAG adresnode en dan regels aanvullen. Mapse commented 2026-09-30 21:11:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189790101 (Comments: 1) | Joel D Reid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the help adding buildings in our area! This one is no longer an active school. We have a lot of abandoned schools in this area. Do you know of any good ways to tag it as no longer in use, or if we should? commented 2026-09-30 21:01:56 UTC by Boberino ♦1 |
| 189744946 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Frason Jorge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Essa extensão que você alterou a velocidade, tem mais placas indicando 40 km/h do que 60 km/h, veja as imagens no Street View: https://www.google.com/maps/@-21.7619728,-41.3476043,3a,75y,166.79h,85.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s-CCGHVuVbflhBren... commented 2026-09-30 20:53:10 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦96 |
| 189638466 (Comments: 2) | B Armstrong (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Phil - will update. commented 2026-09-30 20:46:18 UTC by B Armstrong ♦1 |
| 189719947 (Comments: 3) | danieldebari (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi.. Nee. CoMaps maakt zelf een adres en is niet toegesneden op de Nederlandse situatie waarin we adresnodes importeren. Met de webdditor oo de PC gaat het wel correct. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-30 20:45:50 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189793389 (Comments: 1) | jxpsert (Discussed changesets: 88) | Source is survey + https://www.shishkebab.nl/contact/ commented 2026-09-30 20:36:52 UTC by jxpsert ♦93 |
| 141066270 (Comments: 1) | Keith Helbley (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5548269 ? commented 2026-09-30 20:33:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 186822088 (Comments: 3) | Nicolas Vial (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks for the info, I've opened note/5548267 so it can be surveyed. commented 2026-09-30 20:31:21 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,045 |
| 188198436 (Comments: 1) | JTnl (Discussed changesets: 27) | It looks like you deleted some of my work in the USC. The PDOK imagery is not fresh enough: I visited there in person and surveyed it. Please try not to overwrite manual survey with PDOK aerial edits which might not be up-to-date for an active constr... commented 2026-09-30 20:25:06 UTC by mcld ♦73 |
| 169034108 (Comments: 2) | rezemika (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Merci pour le retour, et désolé pour ces oublis ! Effectivement je ne sais pas si elles sont très utiles, je n'avais pas osé les supprimer vu qu'elles étaient déjà là, mais... commented 2026-09-30 20:22:41 UTC by rezemika ♦29 |
| 189539626 (Comments: 1) | kawaai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Despite we should be grateful that you are adding more data to the map, could you please spend a little more time to learn correct mapping practice? There are several tutorials and an entire wiki full of examples. In this edit, y... commented 2026-09-30 20:17:49 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,087 |
| 189566184 (Comments: 6) | Valec (Discussed changesets: 21) | Vyzera to tak, na H ma stat N80 v smere na Kapitulsky dvor a to je to pri elektricke na vychod. Potom ale aj 902 ma stat tam. Cize to nastupiste co ste pridali ako G pri TPD nie je obsluhovane, nebolo treba ho pridat. Opravim to tak? commented 2026-09-30 20:14:48 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,046 |
| 189792432 (Comments: 1) | trigpoint (Discussed changesets: 80) | Add access:fuel:lpg commented 2026-09-30 20:07:02 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,827 |
| 189761284 (Comments: 2) | LySioS (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thx for your watch. It's clean now commented 2026-09-30 20:04:43 UTC by LySioS ♦160 |
| 188559305 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thanks I have changed it to man_made=waterwheel according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwatermill If this was a watermill, historic=watermill tag could be added, as a single point, or as an area if the area is known. commented 2026-09-30 20:02:50 UTC by cuzi ♦193 |
| 189777091 (Comments: 1) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Szia. Ez múzeum, maga a kastély az északabbi épület. Javítottam. commented 2026-09-30 20:01:39 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189728397 (Comments: 2) | duffyduckas (Discussed changesets: 1) | the slope is steeper at saddle, so it is easier to cross little bit southern commented 2026-09-30 19:58:42 UTC by duffyduckas ♦1 |
| 189745853 (Comments: 2) | CrstblS (Discussed changesets: 22) | Sí Felipe, de hecho están documentados por una organización que trabaja seriamente en el catastro de glaciares rocosos en el valle del aconcagua, que justamente suelen ser omitidos porque están cubiertos de roca. Utilic&ea... commented 2026-09-30 19:55:59 UTC by CrstblS ♦8 |
| 189790151 (Comments: 3) | Heydoc (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem.. paar keer ctrl-F5 dan ziet u het gebouw weer. commented 2026-09-30 19:45:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189791584 (Comments: 1) | Duja (Discussed changesets: 28) | I acknowledge that this changeset broke a few boundary and forest relations, and I plan to fix them ASAP. commented 2026-09-30 19:42:15 UTC by Duja ♦104 |
| 189777300 (Comments: 1) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Szia. Ezt visszavontam, jelölve volt már a gyógyszertár külön pontként. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element commented 2026-09-30 19:40:06 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189788204 (Comments: 1) | Patrik470 (Discussed changesets: 1) | You've dragged nodes 12308983606 and 12454324097 out of position, causing road and sidewalk ways to cross buildings. I have manually reverted these changes. I have also moved the camera you added and amended the tagging to reflect it... commented 2026-09-30 19:32:39 UTC by hoserab ♦256 |
| 189649277 (Comments: 1) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 130) | Are these sidewalks explicitly signed as no bicycles allowed at all, or are you continuing to mistakenly add "bicycle=no" when either omitting the "bicycle=*" tag or using"bicycle=dismount" describes the situation correc... commented 2026-09-30 19:31:11 UTC by tomhukins ♦303 |
| 189781571 (Comments: 1) | AlejandroGHL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Por favor no agregar el tag building. eso es para las estructuras. Es claro que no hay un edificio que ocupe toda la propiedad. Salu2 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189781... commented 2026-09-30 19:29:53 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189783128 (Comments: 1) | CarlosIllesca (Discussed changesets: 2) | ok, gracias, pero el camino sigue existiendo? solo que no pueden pasar vehículos. Pueden pasar peatones? saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189783128 ... commented 2026-09-30 19:29:05 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 166209919 (Comments: 1) | Valario127 (Discussed changesets: 6) | What you wanted to express by traffic_calming=choker on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21678845/history ? It looks like it is simply place where lane count get smaller on motorway - have you tried to map that? Or is it more significant? commented 2026-09-30 19:28:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189768614 (Comments: 5) | Tim van der Kloet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wanneer het clubhuis van de Scouting hier ook zit kun je op de adresnode ook de tagging voor scout toevoegen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout Meestal voeg ik nog amenity=community_centre toe met community_centre=clu... commented 2026-09-30 19:26:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189648980 (Comments: 3) | jesh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hyvä juttu. Polku lienee siis väärällä paikalla. Siirrän polkua sitten, kun menen siitä seuraavan kerran ohi. commented 2026-09-30 19:06:27 UTC by Tuplanolla ♦20 |
| 189763623 (Comments: 2) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour David, J’ai cherché les bâtiments manquants sur les photos aériennes Bing disponibles sur Josm, j’ai du passer à côté du bâti dont tu parles. En général, je vér... commented 2026-09-30 18:52:26 UTC by foehn ♦15 |
| 189469561 (Comments: 4) | Stanislav_1988 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks Stanislav! Cheers, and happy mapping! commented 2026-09-30 18:48:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189761955 (Comments: 2) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour David, Merci pour ce suivi. Effectivement j’applique la méthode convenue avec l’auteur de Pifometre lors d’une discussion au SOTM2025 à Tours. Cet outil développé bénévolement per... commented 2026-09-30 18:46:54 UTC by foehn ♦15 |
| 189771118 (Comments: 1) | Erik Vroon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Erik, Je hebt nu de name van het gebied aangepast, maar de name:nl laten staan. Bij het gebouw heb je de nieuwe name als alt_name toegevoegd. Ik zie in beide een correcte naamgeving, maar lijkt mij wel handig om consistent te blijven. |
| 33056659 (Comments: 4) | Melaskia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Le Procès-verbal de séance de la mairie d'Orléans, en date du 7 février 1908 (seance du 19 octobre), parle d'une contribution financière pour faire élever à Paris un monument à Marceli... commented 2026-09-30 18:41:23 UTC by Dani CS ♦79 |
 | 180733193 (Comments: 1) | Sam Jayah (Discussed changesets: 6) | the road between sooriyakanda and rakwana is not a trunk, primary would be okay commented 2026-09-30 18:37:54 UTC by VisibleSouth ♦20 |
| 187717409 (Comments: 5) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | I think that looks really good! Thank you. Yeah, things do get a bit shifty around the dams - it becomes a judgment call where to stop following the old river path. I think your approach here is fine. If you want to do more waterway map... commented 2026-09-30 18:37:27 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦47 |
| 189071500 (Comments: 1) | abaddon89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao! Il tag name serve solo per i nomi propri. Inserire "Fontanella" come nome è un errore di ridondanza: la natura dell'oggetto è già definita dal tag della categoria (amenity=drinking_water). Buona giornata commented 2026-09-30 18:35:21 UTC by davide020382 ♦8 |
| 189274526 (Comments: 1) | Mapikids (Discussed changesets: 13) | DreamLand wordt met een camel case geschreven, dus niet als Dreamland. Ik zal het herstellen. Zie ook https://www.dreamland.nl/ commented 2026-09-30 18:27:08 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,219 |
| 189722711 (Comments: 1) | xuyaca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, unfortunately you removed the most important tag highway=crossing. crossing=traffic_signal was also right there, as this is an important regulated pedestrian crossing. I fixed that Greetings commented 2026-09-30 18:20:59 UTC by onterof ♦70 |
| 189770979 (Comments: 4) | Erik Vroon (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Erik , Op zich is informatie toevoegen oke. Een polygoon aanpassen naar de nieuwe vorm is ook prima. De enige 'vergissing' hier was dat alles een gebouw werd. Dat is nu opgelost. No problem... Mvg en mapse verder... commented 2026-09-30 18:12:47 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189748010 (Comments: 1) | User202608 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189788304 commented 2026-09-30 18:11:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189712688 (Comments: 1) | UWS-Tirol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, diese Objekte haben sehr viele Tags, die nicht in OSM gehören. Für größere Importe bitte auch immer die Import Richtlinien beachten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines commented 2026-09-30 18:06:46 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189745539 (Comments: 1) | Mariafernandacanoclemente (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed you and others adding many strange tags like these listed below: What do they mean? Please make sure to agree on one common spelling in all edits! clave clave de verificaion clave_de_verificaacion clve de verif... commented 2026-09-30 18:01:28 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189558270 (Comments: 1) | TrejoSsalcedo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed you and others adding many strange tags like these listed below: What do they mean? Please make sure to agree on one common spelling in all edits! clave clave de verificaion clave_de_verificaacion clve de verif... commented 2026-09-30 18:01:11 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189521192 (Comments: 1) | MOISES ALEJANDRO GARCIA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed you and others adding many strange tags like these listed below: What do they mean? Please make sure to agree on one common spelling in all edits! clave clave de verificaion clave_de_verificaacion clve de verif... commented 2026-09-30 18:01:07 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189420381 (Comments: 2) | rogerscgreg (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's unfortunately vacant. In fact, the entire building is. commented 2026-09-30 17:59:22 UTC by rogerscgreg ♦1 |
| 189698623 (Comments: 1) | GrowinBabies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787405 commented 2026-09-30 17:49:57 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
 | 189409587 (Comments: 4) | JSAN_2018 (Discussed changesets: 5) | What is the source of all this data? If you import data from another source into OSM, it's mandatory to follow our Import Guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines As these nodes can't be used in OSM, and a... commented 2026-09-30 17:44:02 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189740142 (Comments: 1) | abakuk (Discussed changesets: 1) | i contenuti delle carte Tabacco sono soggetti ai diritti di proprietà intellettuale della casa editrice Tabacco. Non credo consentano l'uso per redigere altra cartografia (come OSM) / The content of Tabacco maps is subject to the intellec... commented 2026-09-30 17:43:35 UTC by fabiotofy ♦337 |
| 189716725 (Comments: 1) | firdavs11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189787143 commented 2026-09-30 17:42:56 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189785797 (Comments: 1) | mavOsaure (Discussed changesets: 5) | source= Orthos Express - IGN 2026; knowledge commented 2026-09-30 17:13:50 UTC by mavOsaure ♦41 |
| 189754217 (Comments: 1) | Белый Андрей (Discussed changesets: 5) | Разве здесь полный запрет проезда для авто? - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174764547 На всех спутниках автомобили припаркованы у дома. Прошу вернуть к... commented 2026-09-30 17:09:31 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,294 |
 | 189518692 (Comments: 1) | AnnaCatarina (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi AnnaCatarina, I noticed you added motorways around toll booths. The OSM Wiki mentions for multiple toll booths "where there is physical separation between lines at toll gates, the lines may be mapped as separate highway=* ways. For practic... commented 2026-09-30 17:05:36 UTC by LakeTana ♦23 |
| 176252747 (Comments: 1) | ArMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Si c'est fermé définitivement, pourquoi ne pas l'avoir basculé en was:shop ou shop=vacant ? En laissant shop=bakery, ça peut ressortir quand on demande (comaps ou autre) une boulangerie (sous-enten... commented 2026-09-30 16:58:29 UTC by LudovicG ♦165 |
| 189695052 (Comments: 4) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 130) | That is simply out of date. There USED to be a play area there - it has now gone. It has never been a recreation ground. commented 2026-09-30 16:58:27 UTC by Pete Owens ♦88 |
| 189722448 (Comments: 1) | matder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, cette relation est cassée https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10743540/history#map=16/51.00729/2.08267 Je te laisse poursuivre tes modifs dans le coin, notamment en la corrigeant. Cordialement commented 2026-09-30 16:41:07 UTC by Yunan973 ♦171 |
| 189774181 (Comments: 3) | daniellenz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Genau, dann muss aber der amenity-Tag an die Fläche, sonst ist sie doppelt erfasst. Am Gebäude darf dann nur der building-tag bleiben. Hab es schon behoben commented 2026-09-30 16:39:16 UTC by limes11 ♦1,112 |
| 189773104 (Comments: 1) | Uwenr5 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hier ist beim Teilen der Straße zwar das neu Straßenstück zur Linie VRT 408 hinzugefügt worden. Jedoch nicht an der richtigen Stelle, sonder am Ende. Ich habe das angepasst. Bitte demnächst beachten, dass der ID-Editor ... commented 2026-09-30 16:31:27 UTC by bernward1 ♦51 |
| 189507462 (Comments: 2) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 23) | Yes, thank you. It is a typo that i am fixing. I cannot qualified this broken barrier. commented 2026-09-30 16:28:06 UTC by l3BAM ♦74 |
| 184016299 (Comments: 20) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 15) | I agree with Kevin. And you said the AT is broken down to match trail guides, and like Kevin said, the End to End Tally Sheet uses these same sections, the official Long Path guide uses these sections, when people are hiking the Long Path thry will s... commented 2026-09-30 16:27:54 UTC by matthewfecica ♦12 |
| 189698447 (Comments: 3) | Octer (Discussed changesets: 2) | En supprimant l'attribut wall, tu as mis des murs partout alors qu'avant il y avait des bâtiments sans murs. J'ai tout annulé et remis comme c'était. Retient qu'il ne faut JAMAIS fusionner de... commented 2026-09-30 16:27:41 UTC by Yunan973 ♦171 |
| 189774620 (Comments: 1) | daniellenz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, der Spielplatz ist bereits hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/679052450 Ist das komplette Gelände, das bisher als Park erfasst war, ein Spielplatz ? commented 2026-09-30 16:16:51 UTC by limes11 ♦1,112 |
| 189775168 (Comments: 1) | daniellenz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, das Gymasium ist bereits hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/983740785 Was ist denn in dem nördlichen Gebäudetrakt ? Wird der auch vom Gymasium genutzt ? Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-30 16:10:35 UTC by limes11 ♦1,112 |
| 189668307 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Udarian, thank you for making the corrections and the nudge. That obviously has slipped my attention, but I’ll make sure to be more careful about affected alignments. Much appreciated, happy mapping to you too. commented 2026-09-30 16:07:48 UTC by Ky_AT ♦26 |
| 189510257 (Comments: 5) | Fannar82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, nein, dafür ist die Sachlage zu kurzfristig. Wie ich oben schrieb, der Zustand sollte für mehrere Monate vorhanden sein. Dass diese Fähre ihren Dienst komplett einstellt ist selten und so aussichtslos ist die Situation n... commented 2026-09-30 16:04:34 UTC by limes11 ♦1,112 |
| 189405571 (Comments: 3) | AlejandroGHL (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gracias Alejandro. El nombre que eliminaste es es el nombre oficial del camino. Eso no está en cuestión. El tema es si acaso el nombre que agregaste es el usado. Sobre Google, no es una fuente que podamos usar. Por lo dem&aac... commented 2026-09-30 16:02:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 148758459 (Comments: 2) | gc27 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, this changeset created at 2y ago and 10000 change set ago, so I'm not sure what I did at that time. But I will look into your note. * I think this way means that "station building that build over the platform", but not sure h... commented 2026-09-30 15:53:58 UTC by gc27 ♦28 |
| 189776415 (Comments: 1) | Nikola Djunev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравейте, Благодаря за промяната! Струва ми се че е доста рано за повишаване на ранга на тези улици. По-скоро бих изчакал да завършат ... commented 2026-09-30 15:52:17 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,045 |
| 189680456 (Comments: 3) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 8) | In the case, you would put landuse=construction on the individual lots that are being constructed, not the whole neighborhood. Also, are you sure you're using the most up-to-date imagery when determining that an area is under construction? I... commented 2026-09-30 15:40:37 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦55 |
| 189754835 (Comments: 1) | Xaver R (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Xaver, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Ich sehe, dass du in deiner ersten Änderung das Stadion Vaterstetten als Punkt (https://osm.org/node/14233123840) hinzugefügt hast. Jetzt ist es aber doppelt eingetragen, denn es war bisher sch... commented 2026-09-30 15:40:14 UTC by flo2154 ♦72 |
| 189775288 (Comments: 1) | kawaai (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. I am currently trying to repair all the edits you made today and spotted this. While you are adding some useful information to the map, I am afraid there are a few issues. One of the key principles of O... commented 2026-09-30 15:36:53 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,087 |
| 158679085 (Comments: 5) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 404) | Top dankjewel @A67-A67 commented 2026-09-30 15:33:16 UTC by defluyter ♦28 |
| 189778882 (Comments: 2) | defluyter (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ik heb deze en de vorige foutieve wijziging teruggedraaid. commented 2026-09-30 15:33:03 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,219 |
 | 181823301 (Comments: 6) | Ορφέας Μαρκετάκης (Discussed changesets: 4) | i see that currently drivers are using this part of the road commented 2026-09-30 15:31:52 UTC by rodolfosp ♦1 |
| 189780717 (Comments: 1) | ReedShomaker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry please don't accept this, I got confused on where this is, the current state is accurate commented 2026-09-30 15:31:40 UTC by ReedShomaker ♦1 |
| 166305840 (Comments: 1) | Jvitegem (Discussed changesets: 38) | In deze wijziging wordt naast de BAG-update ook een relatie omgezet van een toekomstige turn-restrictie naar een bestaande turn-restrictie. Dit is onjuist en heeft inmiddels meer dan een jaar voor verkeerde navigatie gezorgd. Ik ga het terugze... commented 2026-09-30 15:31:09 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,219 |
 | 182480778 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 42) | 95150699 is not a pedestrian street. it was tagged correcly as link. FYI commented 2026-09-30 15:26:22 UTC by Dindia ♦64 |
| 189558854 (Comments: 2) | Madi-Red (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi Frans S, Thank you for your message. I wanted to validate the grids thoroughly, with a primary focus on adding buildings that had been missed during the initial editing. However, I apparently overlooked some existing issues. I acknowledge the f... commented 2026-09-30 15:17:51 UTC by Madi-Red ♦23 |
| 189771966 (Comments: 2) | corridorhybrids (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo kadiwa, covered=arcade kannte ich noch nicht, ist hier aber eindeutig korrekter als tunnel=building_passage. Vielen Dank für das sorfältige Anschauen, den ausführlichen Hinweis und die schnelle Korrektur. Viele Grü... commented 2026-09-30 15:12:22 UTC by corridorhybrids ♦1 |
| 189363213 (Comments: 3) | skradacz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Poprawiłem na tyle, na ile udało mi się ustalić z Trójmiasta xD na pewno Babimojska jest odcięta od parkingu, jak wynika że zdjęć które udało mi się znaleźć. Układ drogowy, jezeli chodzi o połączenie tego parkingu z drog... commented 2026-09-30 15:11:48 UTC by skradacz ♦1 |
| 188380169 (Comments: 1) | lubosb (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ahoj, tento chodnik (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803314091) si vyznacil duplicitne. Uz raz bola jeho pritomnosti vyznacena na prilahlej ceste tagom sidewalk=left. Opravil som. Daj na to pozor v buducnosti, prosim. Viac viz. osm wiki. commented 2026-09-30 15:05:03 UTC by Tomas_J ♦426 |
| 189779588 (Comments: 1) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 24) | I apparently added a Node to underground cable way/1378675226 by accident. commented 2026-09-30 15:00:52 UTC by cyclist789 ♦135 |
| 189747101 (Comments: 1) | Sam0Te (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, peux tu éviter de détruire des bâtiments corrects en les remplaçant pas des éléments erronés ? En fusionnant les 4 bâtiments de la mairie, deux qui sont des toits et deux avec d... commented 2026-09-30 14:59:06 UTC by Yunan973 ♦171 |
| 189767764 (Comments: 4) | sembelst134 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Oke, habs zurückgesetzt: changeset/189778437 Bei Gelegenheit werd ich da vllt mal die issues von den osm-carto auf git durchsuchen, ob es da bereits ein thread bezüglich der Darstellung gibt. Und wenn Reiter auf DE:240 Wegen v... commented 2026-09-30 14:57:48 UTC by sembelst134 ♦66 |
| 186004150 (Comments: 8) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 56) | Niemand sagt im natürlichen Sprachgebrauch: "Bin in Birmensdorf Zett Ha" sondern "Bin in Birmensdorf in Zürich". Dass dieses Birmensdorf hier in ZH ist lässt sich von den übrigen Daten ableiten. Und wenn ... commented 2026-09-30 14:47:59 UTC by GartenStuhl ♦108 |
| 189659231 (Comments: 1) | aul12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189778380 commented 2026-09-30 14:36:22 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 188810751 (Comments: 2) | Cortix (Discussed changesets: 27) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community Fixed commented 2026-09-30 14:32:59 UTC by Cortix ♦23 |
| 189277571 (Comments: 3) | hobby_mapper98 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No worries. Like a lot of OSM stuff it's a European style to differentiate between ground floor and 1st floor (North American 2nd floor). One way to think about it is building:levels - building:min_level gives the actual number of floors/levels. commented 2026-09-30 14:14:44 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 |
| 189770121 (Comments: 1) | Dwella (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Dwella, welcome to OSM! Just a quick note: most urban roads in Ghana have already been mapped, so before tracing new roads, please check whether they already exist on the map. Also, Go Map!! isn’t the best app for adding roads... commented 2026-09-30 13:51:26 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦190 |
| 189658893 (Comments: 1) | Kevin Obregon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189776206 commented 2026-09-30 13:48:49 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 181251238 (Comments: 1) | BDGAS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je ne suis pas d'accord avec le fait de passer l'autoroute en primary. Certes, il y a effondrement avec réduction de voie et limite à 50 km/h mais c'est toujours une autoroute. commented 2026-09-30 13:48:29 UTC by Eric S ♦41 |
| 189720826 (Comments: 2) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 66) | Ciao @totera, è vero il tuo argomento sull'ambiguità, e lo stesso si può dire anche per segnali di stop, semafori, etc... quando hanno una direzione e sono su un nodo condiviso tra due vie. Però un cartello mappato su... commented 2026-09-30 13:47:40 UTC by f_gonella ♦70 |
| 189441960 (Comments: 3) | ngocthienvtii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tôi mong bạn cẩn thận hơn khi chỉnh sửa, và đừng tạo ra những lỗi sai như thế này, vì nó ảnh hưởng đến vấn đề điều hướng. commented 2026-09-30 13:39:02 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦59 |
| 189052119 (Comments: 1) | artenovis_9020 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Благодаря за промяната! След като сте решили проблем от дадена бележка е хубаво да я затваряте. Поздрави, Митко commented 2026-09-30 13:38:30 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,045 |
| 189733662 (Comments: 1) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 13) | Dag Bosbeheerder Er is nu weer een nieuwe mapper actief die de voetpaden openzet voor fietsers met bicycle=yes. Geen idee of het klopt en of het wel voetpaden zijn? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189769167#map=18/52.381553/5... commented 2026-09-30 13:34:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189775232 (Comments: 1) | Erik Vroon (Discussed changesets: 3) | .. en dan ga je door als je al die foutmeldingen krijgt? Ik heb nu de buildingtag verwijderd. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-30 13:29:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189765006 (Comments: 2) | Kris Van Kerckhoven (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is how it looks like on my wandrer app; the red line I cannot walk. All the blue lines I did walk and so they are no red anymore... Hmm I cannot add a screenshot? OK so pls go to wandrer.earth and try to fill all the paths on this intersection.... commented 2026-09-30 13:28:59 UTC by Kris Van Kerckhoven ♦1 |
| 189745065 (Comments: 2) | Poblete22 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Eliminado por vandalismo commented 2026-09-30 13:26:09 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189623567 (Comments: 11) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | I właśnie znalazłem nam użytkownika, który dodał kilkaset niemieckich nazw bez pokrycia :) commented 2026-09-30 13:21:17 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦449 |
| 189770115 (Comments: 1) | BLwYWIC1Ak6bAIZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-30 13:13:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189674438 (Comments: 4) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 123) | sprawdziłem raz jeszcze ślady z wczoraj i widać wyraźnie ruch jednokierunkowy od Szyszkowej do Mineralnej. Ponadto w zgłoszeniu była informacja, że zmiana obowiązuje już jakiegoś czasu. Nie jestem pewien, czy ZDM informuje o wszystkich loka... commented 2026-09-30 13:10:40 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦102 |
| 188800056 (Comments: 1) | MarylinRamos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what does 'diet:salinera' mean? Some low-salt diet? commented 2026-09-30 13:10:33 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189768702 (Comments: 1) | Bosburger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Zeker weten dat je hier mag fietsen... daar Bosbeheerder BV de fietspaden juist op bicycle=no heeft gezet? MVG, |
| 189773885 (Comments: 1) | nulltivitamine (Discussed changesets: 1) | stark! commented 2026-09-30 13:06:07 UTC by nulltivitamine ♦1 |
| 155158430 (Comments: 5) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hi, But what is the solution for indicating that the basement is partially below grade? commented 2026-09-30 13:03:23 UTC by michel60 ♦104 |
| 189654700 (Comments: 1) | nifqi (Discussed changesets: 2) | ya apa bedanya? commented 2026-09-30 13:01:08 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189761141 (Comments: 1) | Rtaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tekan Q untuk membuat sempurna persegi commented 2026-09-30 12:58:09 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189749001 (Comments: 5) | Fonv (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hier GraphHopper https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.07382%2C4.424583%3B52.072877%2C4.424004 Maar als je Valhalla of osrm instelt in het al weer anders. commented 2026-09-30 12:50:51 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 134715463 (Comments: 1) | Eric Bie (Discussed changesets: 58) | Bonjour ! Est-ce que le changement d'orthographe "Marcelin" ⇒ "Marcellin" est confirmé? Cf. changeset 33056659 qui prenait soin à corriger l'orthographe dans le sens opposé. commented 2026-09-30 12:37:43 UTC by Dani CS ♦79 |
| 188759834 (Comments: 1) | DevTimmOfTO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, du hast hier "delivery:post_box" hinzugefügt. Das gibt es sonst nirgends. Meinst du, dass es keinen Briefkasten am Haus gibt? Die heißen in OSM nicht post_box, sondern letter_box. Ich würde also letter_box=no vo... commented 2026-09-30 12:37:27 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189766920 (Comments: 1) | fluzzz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fluzzz, thank you for your contribution! It's very useful to have amenities like restaurants up to date. You changed the name of the restaurants, however, it's clear that other tags have also changed (website, phone, opening hours, cuisi... commented 2026-09-30 12:28:08 UTC by BBJIB ♦18 |
| 186986034 (Comments: 2) | multimob (Discussed changesets: 62) | Inderdaad. Toen deze wijziging in augustus werd doorgevoerd, beschouwde De Lijn die haltes als niet meer bestaand. En nu zijn ze weer terug in de officiële gegevens. Dit is ondertussen aangepast. Bedankt. commented 2026-09-30 12:27:08 UTC by multimob ♦91 |
| 189769776 (Comments: 2) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ganz ehrlich? Welche bessere Darstellung nach der Verschiebung? Lass es! Es ist unnötig, die Objekte zu verschieben, wenn die richtige Lage haben commented 2026-09-30 12:24:58 UTC by Znaika ♦227 |
| 187104933 (Comments: 3) | stavrosP (Discussed changesets: 5) | Όταν έφυγε ο Κρητικός ξήλωσε και το Joltie commented 2026-09-30 12:15:31 UTC by stavrosP ♦5 |
| 188787240 (Comments: 2) | Langlaeufer (Discussed changesets: 140) | Ja, der letzte doppelpunkt ist zu viel. commented 2026-09-30 12:14:02 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,586 |
| 189622299 (Comments: 2) | Jagged DeepPink Echidna (Discussed changesets: 2) | Good catch! at the time I forgot to add an note regarding that. I plan to check myself next weekend to see the situation commented 2026-09-30 12:01:00 UTC by Jagged DeepPink Echidna ♦2 |
| 49731438 (Comments: 1) | Bahntech (Discussed changesets: 38) | moin Bahntech, kannst du bitte schauen, warum du in diesem Changeset dem Way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467133055) die Tags genommen hast? commented 2026-09-30 11:59:01 UTC by AlexSpritze ♦47 |
| 189731386 (Comments: 3) | janhals (Discussed changesets: 33) | Map what's on the ground is het motto. 👍 commented 2026-09-30 11:53:00 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189724686 (Comments: 2) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ok, ich habe mich verguckt. Dachte der Punkt liegt außerhalb vom Gebäude. Aber das ist der Restaurantbereich, nicht die Rezeption. Bist Du vor Ort gewesen? commented 2026-09-30 11:48:09 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 |
| 189648171 (Comments: 1) | Dany Côté (Discussed changesets: 1) | (traduction automatique) Bonjour, l'utilisation que vous faites des balises semble correspondre à une importation non documentée. OSM a-t-il l'autorisation d'utiliser « Adresses Québec »? Ce proj... commented 2026-09-30 11:45:29 UTC by Joel Koen ♦93 |
| 189756124 (Comments: 1) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Und jetzt hast Du ihn doppelt eingetragen. commented 2026-09-30 11:40:18 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 |
| 189756123 (Comments: 1) | Elias Rogge (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wir hier vermutet? Auf dem Platz? Woher hast Du die Info? commented 2026-09-30 11:38:32 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 |
| 189552843 (Comments: 3) | Doc Géofan (Discussed changesets: 3) | @kunalchharpe For the time being, I had chosen to add them, but I gather it is better to wait for more recent images or another source; please feel free to let me know. I can then remove the relevant items. Oh, and speaking of land use, I admit it... commented 2026-09-30 11:30:46 UTC by Doc Géofan ♦2 |
| 174674309 (Comments: 1) | lukeender (Discussed changesets: 2) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17018903 This is a bit of strange tagging. parking:both=left shouldn't that not be parking:left=yes? And when parking only on one side, should parking:both:orientation=parallel not be change... commented 2026-09-30 11:26:33 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 188237112 (Comments: 1) | jo xeis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Ich werde dein changeset reverten, ich denke es ist klar, dass aus eine Fährenroute nicht einfach so ein Wanderweg werden kann. mfg commented 2026-09-30 11:16:18 UTC by parsewski ♦27 |
| 188295947 (Comments: 1) | Rove (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, I noted you have reconnected the cima to the admin boundary, but it has been recently removed by Simon Poole as a result of checking with official swiss data. Which are your sources? commented 2026-09-30 11:15:29 UTC by dieterdreist ♦920 |
| 189718461 (Comments: 1) | Tyoma14 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi! Wrong format for street name translations. See my comment on this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188789608 commented 2026-09-30 11:11:16 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 137472682 (Comments: 4) | dx125 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Okay, ich prüfe das und dann wird das in den meisten Fällen gelöscht werden. Es wird etwas dauern, bitte um Geduld. commented 2026-09-30 11:05:16 UTC by dx125 ♦130 |
| 181875506 (Comments: 1) | artfulblahblah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you've changed access=destination to bicycle=destination for this bicycle road. I assume you meant bicycle=designated instead. access=destination most likely should have been vehicle=destination, since through traffic is prohib... commented 2026-09-30 11:02:23 UTC by Luzandro ♦1,039 |
| 177613129 (Comments: 2) | Boswachter Piet (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have fixed one part were the modification from highway=path to highway=cyclepath was incorrect. I get what was intended (there is a path for hikers and a path for offroad cycling), but it several mistakes were made while mapping this situation. I r... commented 2026-09-30 10:51:32 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦435 |
| 189757737 (Comments: 1) | Heyhohayhohu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Üdv. Ez biztos, hogy hotel? commented 2026-09-30 10:44:59 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189765330 (Comments: 2) | engel321 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, in meiner Gegend bin ich sie schon abgefahren aber die sind auch unter https://radroutenplaner.hessen.de/map/ kartiert :) commented 2026-09-30 10:28:16 UTC by engel321 ♦1 |
| 189639134 (Comments: 4) | britischer_elch (Discussed changesets: 6) | Alles klar, danke dir für deine Erklärung! commented 2026-09-30 10:24:15 UTC by PPete2 ♦187 |
| 189766565 (Comments: 1) | Dave Attacks (Discussed changesets: 1) | NB: The title need careful reading (more careful than when I first added this). In the Title Plan, the woodland is *not* the brown/orange shaded area, rather it is the area within the red border but excluding the areas with green borders. commented 2026-09-30 10:22:58 UTC by Dave Attacks ♦1 |
| 185251438 (Comments: 1) | Knubbelbubble (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke füs mappen. Die Hausnummer liegt bereits im Adresstag (Punkt) auf dem Hauptgebäude,diese werden für die Navigation heraugezogen. Gebäude selber tagen keine Adressbezeichnung. Werde die Haunummern aus den Nebenge... commented 2026-09-30 10:21:40 UTC by SaPatz ♦6 |
| 189750774 (Comments: 4) | Bobby&Anya (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oke.. laat maar even zo dan hoef je allen maar de details aan te passen en disused te verwijderen. Gr eggie commented 2026-09-30 10:21:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 188285839 (Comments: 2) | superrache (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bonjour, vérifié sur le terrain, c'est une descente très directe avec un panneau "descente abrupte". Je l'ai repéré d'en haut mais pas emprunté. J'irai vérifier sa positio... commented 2026-09-30 10:10:30 UTC by superrache ♦25 |
| 181211101 (Comments: 2) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 175) | Het was me verteld op de natuurpunt-werkdag. Echte inside knowledge dus :p commented 2026-09-30 10:00:31 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦473 |
| 189756086 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 85) | За n11026067469 - какво трябва да означава "PPSA Association only"? Това предполага ли някакви ограничения? Какво е PPSA? Ако контекстът е шеговит(прим... commented 2026-09-30 09:56:25 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 189765064 (Comments: 1) | NeatNit (Discussed changesets: 5) | Accidentally pressed the "Restore" button, was really unclear what it was gonna do... Whoops. I think better-osm needs a confirmation dialog. commented 2026-09-30 09:55:03 UTC by NeatNit ♦87 |
| 160535412 (Comments: 5) | pangoSE (Discussed changesets: 47) | ;-) jag skall på möte imorgon https://www.lansstyrelsen.se/stockholm/om-oss/kalender/kalenderhandelser---stockholm/2026-06-05-regionalt-vandringsledsforum.html Tror det saknas ledägare som det heter etc.... Tackar den ka... commented 2026-09-30 09:51:29 UTC by salgo60 ♦22 |
| 189762892 (Comments: 1) | PGTypes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback In OSM taggen we bedrijven e.d. bij op de adresnodes. Ook voegen we de aard van het bedrijf toe. Ik heb het a... commented 2026-09-30 09:49:33 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189676532 (Comments: 1) | tyroleanDave (Discussed changesets: 4) | bitte versuche bei Baustellen, abgebrochenen Häusern die neu gebaut werden etc. statt zu löschen und etwas mit gleichen Infos (z.B. Adresse) wieder als construction anzulegen die vorhandenen Elemente und zu bearbeiten; das erhält die H... commented 2026-09-30 09:48:01 UTC by fs_LT ♦242 |
| 189702932 (Comments: 1) | joof_gambron (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189765241 commented 2026-09-30 09:47:21 UTC by MappingMore ♦751 |
| 189762857 (Comments: 4) | youphavermans (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by changeset #189765198 commented 2026-09-30 09:46:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189677069 (Comments: 1) | tyroleanDave (Discussed changesets: 4) | ich nehme an das Haus Maderspergerstr 22 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318044740) wurde abgebrochen, es wird aber ein Neues gebaut und das bekommt vermutlich auch wieder die selbe Adresse? dann wäre es optimal statt zu löschen den http... commented 2026-09-30 09:38:14 UTC by fs_LT ♦242 |
| 189640109 (Comments: 3) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 63) | Hi lyctkel, Handig zo'n foto. Ik heb de name aangepast. commented 2026-09-30 09:37:03 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 104374027 (Comments: 1) | blauloke (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hallo, ich habe Dir bzgl. des nodes 8712708066 (fountain) eine PM geschickt. commented 2026-09-30 09:36:05 UTC by tracker51 ♦17 |
| 184207182 (Comments: 1) | Картограф-любитель (Discussed changesets: 13) | Прикольно, когда на узкой пешеходной дорожке появляется "разворотная петля с островом". commented 2026-09-30 09:35:33 UTC by save2desk ♦90 |
| 189760342 (Comments: 1) | rorcho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Благодаря за промяната! Когато има група от контейнери, достатъчно е да се сложи само една точка с допълнителен таг за броя им. В случая - c... commented 2026-09-30 09:29:12 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,045 |
| 188273039 (Comments: 1) | Ernie C (Discussed changesets: 19) | Zijn de veld/boswegen hier daadwerkelijk wegen of slechts bandensporen van de grasmaaier/machines die hier onderhoud plegen. Vraag me af of het de bedoeling is dat ik hier met mijn auto gebruik van maak. commented 2026-09-30 09:25:50 UTC by Remlicht89 ♦15 |
| 189669226 (Comments: 2) | Валентин Ян (Discussed changesets: 48) | Вітаю! Перепрошую, гадав що для старих назв це не суттєво. В подальшому залишатиму усі мови старої назви за виключенням зазначених вами! commented 2026-09-30 09:23:52 UTC by Валентин Ян ♦18 |
| 170905114 (Comments: 1) | Dasharath Shetty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moved commented 2026-09-30 09:15:34 UTC by Dashu42332 ♦1 |
| 189722893 (Comments: 1) | xoravo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189763722 commented 2026-09-30 09:13:07 UTC by MappingMore ♦751 |
| 169237735 (Comments: 1) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 28) | Jeg har tilføjet area=yes på way/1080449845 og andre overflader. Jeg kan dog ikke gennemskue way/1080195426. commented 2026-09-30 08:59:54 UTC by cyclist789 ♦135 |
| 184340122 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a cul-de-sac in Vietnam? commented 2026-09-30 08:46:12 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,002 |
| 188554234 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a small residential road in Bangladesh? commented 2026-09-30 08:45:14 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,002 |
| 134586892 (Comments: 2) | piterwrc (Discussed changesets: 14) | Nie wiem jak z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366133897 , ale z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360545368 zachowały się ruiny przyczółków commented 2026-09-30 08:43:46 UTC by dzamper ♦281 |
| 184340119 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a footway crossing in Italy? commented 2026-09-30 08:41:28 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,002 |
| 187516998 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to an alley in Bulgaria? commented 2026-09-30 08:40:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,002 |
| 188901515 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a building in India? commented 2026-09-30 08:38:17 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,002 |
| 188901567 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a building in Great Britain? commented 2026-09-30 08:37:23 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,002 |
| 189754535 (Comments: 1) | nshz (Discussed changesets: 52) | What is the purpose of adding an Arabic name to a solar power generator in Poland? commented 2026-09-30 08:36:32 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦1,002 |
| 189422066 (Comments: 3) | voschix (Discussed changesets: 79) | :-) commented 2026-09-30 08:35:41 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦373 |
| 189750653 (Comments: 1) | LenapeTrail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". I have DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2026-09-30 08:31:53 UTC by Comino ♦416 |
| 189741393 (Comments: 5) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1024) | Of the 51 payphones you changed only 5 had FLPC, so why change all of them without discussing? Surely you saw at least one of my changeset comments? commented 2026-09-30 08:27:09 UTC by Joel Koen ♦93 |
| 189551066 (Comments: 9) | SuperMarkus (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hier das betreffende Schild: https://web.archive.org/web/20260930074444if_/https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/000/1k4/qt/qtzvlb0e7kz2hzxwi0p7gmnm38zv8fnk-uhi10190928/ Es kommt dabei auch darauf an, dass kein Weg entlang des Rheinufers v... commented 2026-09-30 08:21:27 UTC by Mammi71 ♦284 |
| 185898819 (Comments: 5) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 17) | That’s a very fair point, and it touches on the classic OSM dilemma of 'tagging for the renderer'. It’s definitely frustrating when the technically correct tag isn't visible to the end-users who need it most. I completely u... commented 2026-09-30 08:18:58 UTC by squeaker_andrus ♦18 |
| 189721790 (Comments: 1) | imiraldz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry, I meant the elevation. :P commented 2026-09-30 08:18:29 UTC by imiraldz ♦7 |
| 168010713 (Comments: 1) | dwarfclimbs (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonjour dwarfclimbs, J'ai remarqué que sur certaines voies, tu ajoutais un maxspeed=20, comme sur celle-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1408849156/history#map=19/48.251122/3.357080&layers=N Et aussi les voies autour. A... commented 2026-09-30 08:03:41 UTC by Le Petit Léo ♦38 |
| 189759957 (Comments: 1) | VivekTWD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback: Wellicht office=it ? MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-30 07:54:14 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 187671600 (Comments: 2) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 13) | Het pad liep dan door over een al bestaand pad bij het informatiebord. commented 2026-09-30 07:49:48 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 123560810 (Comments: 1) | nilogian (Discussed changesets: 15) | Scusa il disturbo, ma https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9884991527 è davvero un data center dell'ACI? Buon mapping, Marco commented 2026-09-30 07:43:15 UTC by MarcoR ♦639 |
| 189758364 (Comments: 1) | neefBas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback.. OSM zit vol met regeltjes. De straatnaam Parkeerplaats.... heb ik verwijderd. Het is geen officiële straa... commented 2026-09-30 07:40:26 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189613341 (Comments: 1) | liopolis (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai modifié le nom du cinéma il y a quelques jours, vous avez remis l'ancien. Merci de vérifier vos sources et l'historique des changements avant. Ce n'est plus le cinéma Vautier mais la bobine illib&e... commented 2026-09-30 07:40:16 UTC by LySioS ♦160 |
| 174379002 (Comments: 1) | BeMa84 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ist das kleine Stück Radweg an der Kreuzung Labertalstraße wirklich nur entgegen der entsprechenden Fahrtrichtung auf der Fahrbahn befahrbar? Gehört die Richtung evtl. umgekehrt? commented 2026-09-30 07:38:35 UTC by doppel-b ♦11 |
 | 189749356 (Comments: 1) | KOUAKOU NATHANAEL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi KOUAKOU NATHANAEL, this changeset has creates self intersecting lines : https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.35823&lat=12.18176&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node... commented 2026-09-30 07:35:58 UTC by gscholz ♦3,003 |
| 173044303 (Comments: 2) | maxxdan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! Yes, it's a mistake, I meant sport=motor Actually I think I shouldn't have used club=sport sport=motor but club=motorcycle I've fixed it, thank you. commented 2026-09-30 07:35:01 UTC by maxxdan ♦8 |
| 189618941 (Comments: 3) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 126) | Addresses Vs postal addresses are all a bit complicated. I'm happy for them to be left as Clifton, I'll add exceptions so it doesn't get changed back to Clifton Estate commented 2026-09-30 07:33:16 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦473 |
| 188664033 (Comments: 1) | Sharon A Cruz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Sharon A Cruz, this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Dele" and "Lengabo". https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13530573/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13530572/history |
| 85202605 (Comments: 2) | M100g200 (Discussed changesets: 2) | moto means motorcycle. This naming is standard practice and doesn't require correction. But you can fix it if you think it's necessary commented 2026-09-30 07:02:40 UTC by M100g200 ♦1 |
| 187862178 (Comments: 10) | harisont (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🤦♂️ my bad! commented 2026-09-30 06:52:47 UTC by maasa123 ♦20 |
| 183355690 (Comments: 6) | visitingangels (Discussed changesets: 5) | Took more time than I thought as I also fixed a load of one-off issues with one of the many tags used to fix and make consistent, but its all done in changeset 189758052 for the CONUS and Canada, changeset 189758068 for the UK and changeset 189758080... commented 2026-09-30 06:39:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189746047 (Comments: 4) | osmguy101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nou... Ik ben geen 'fan' van OrganicMaps als editor. Misschien leuk voor onderweg. Die genereert veel fouten. Vooral met adressen. Je kunt het beste de webeditor iD gebruiken of nog beter editor JOSM. editor josm stap voor stap... commented 2026-09-30 06:39:00 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189734094 (Comments: 3) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ahh... oke. In het 'osm verleden' werd tracktype alleen voor tracks gebruikt als specificatie. Tegenwoordig mag je tracktype ook gebruiken voor paden. Vandaar mijn opmerking. Erg logisch is het niet gezien de naam. Tr... commented 2026-09-30 06:35:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189686391 (Comments: 2) | osmdanil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Achso alles klar! Danke für die Erklärung:) Hatte mich irgendwie auch gewundert warum diese Angabe bei einer doch recht bekannten Straße fehlt und hätte das evtl mehr hinterfragen sollen. commented 2026-09-30 06:34:01 UTC by osmdanil ♦1 |
| 189700305 (Comments: 1) | Julien39 (Discussed changesets: 113) | un shop=vacant au lieu d'une suppression // cela nous permettrait de suivre le taux de vacance commented 2026-09-30 06:30:15 UTC by Matmat-25 ♦16 |
| 189600594 (Comments: 1) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Lies bitte OSM-Wiki! Sollte so sein Tu-Sa "Termine nach Vereinbarung" Phone format phone=+<Landesvorwahl> <Bereichsvorwahl> <Rufnummer>, entsprechend ITU-T E.123 und DIN 5... commented 2026-09-30 06:25:40 UTC by Znaika ♦227 |
| 189708227 (Comments: 1) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | sollte so sein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de commented 2026-09-30 06:22:36 UTC by Znaika ♦227 |
| 189244736 (Comments: 2) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 52) | Благодаря за промяната! Само ако може да проверяваш и крайния резултат на рендъра. В случая символите за шубраци се показват върху нивит... commented 2026-09-30 06:21:25 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,045 |
| 188688421 (Comments: 1) | Narusax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Coś Ty za gwiazdki tu porysował?! commented 2026-09-30 06:17:02 UTC by Pooh01 ♦29 |
| 189709117 (Comments: 1) | krissed (Discussed changesets: 1) | Благодаря за редакцията! Отбелязах асансьорите като възли и ги свързах с наземното и подземното ниво, за да може да се използват при нави... commented 2026-09-30 06:15:20 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,045 |
| 189658437 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21367 commented 2026-09-30 06:05:05 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189558726 (Comments: 1) | Doc Géofan (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, could you please clarify the approach and sources you are using for these changes? I have reviewed several of these edits against the available imagery and the current real-world situation, and many of them do not appear to match what is a... commented 2026-09-30 06:03:40 UTC by kunalchhapre ♦2 |
| 189075664 (Comments: 2) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189075471 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189036231 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189028999 (Comments: 2) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189036123 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189028783 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189028686 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189028613 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189028730 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189028198 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189028079 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189757356 commented 2026-09-30 06:03:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189731705 (Comments: 8) | Kavely app (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393 commented 2026-09-30 06:01:41 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189496289 (Comments: 2) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi Udarian, Thank you so much for reaching out. On September 25, the connection ramp from I-95 to US 441 was added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1562302209/history), and based on our telemetry, it accurately represents how you can merge onto... commented 2026-09-30 05:32:47 UTC by rsitoni_Lyft ♦19 |
| 189490764 (Comments: 2) | Tomasz Kozlowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jasne. Dziękuję za informację, będę o tym pamiętać przy przyszłych edycjach. commented 2026-09-30 05:15:42 UTC by Tomasz Kozlowski ♦1 |
| 189729209 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 144) | Yeah, honestly I'm not sure there's a typically accepted methodology for this specific case. I would probably put it in quotes like "every second week" but that's just my guess. commented 2026-09-30 04:55:32 UTC by Omnific ♦242 |
| 189755361 (Comments: 1) | people128256 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Source for this changeset: https://mtbachelor.co.washington.or.us/images/survey/Plats/MOUNTAIN_ROSE.pdf commented 2026-09-30 04:35:31 UTC by people128256 ♦6 |
| 189340739 (Comments: 2) | jewadin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Hinweis. Meine Hoffnung ist, dass dadurch die Zustellung von Paketen auch am Wochenende erfolgt. Denn das Büro ist täglich besetzt... commented 2026-09-30 03:28:21 UTC by jewadin ♦1 |
| 186110292 (Comments: 2) | John Sinclair (Discussed changesets: 18) | I got the tags mixed up, actually. The correct combination is highway=construction + construction=residential commented 2026-09-30 03:27:20 UTC by Solaris07 ♦38 |
| 189705126 (Comments: 1) | plato59 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Mistake: Vuldestein is a fictional nation and does not exist in Oregon. commented 2026-09-30 03:11:57 UTC by plato59 ♦5 |
| 189723446 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hello! Petite boulette, cela ne semble pas être le bon noeud 😂 commented 2026-09-30 03:00:01 UTC by divaddivag ♦157 |
| 175584891 (Comments: 1) | cha73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, mir sind da in Buch einige Mappingfehler aufgefallen. Bitte achte auf solche warnings (und behebe das vor dem Hochladen) und erfinde auch keine Straßennamen oder Verkehrsvorgaben, wo nichts beschildert ist. Servus Wolfgang commented 2026-09-30 02:37:33 UTC by opendcc ♦1,594 |
| 189744499 (Comments: 1) | Editex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why was this changed to secondary? commented 2026-09-30 02:23:38 UTC by MikeN ♦372 |
| 189704110 (Comments: 4) | FloxStopr (Discussed changesets: 1) | With them being corporate “owned” and installed on private property not much the state can do. These would be the first in the state for sure. But more will be coming at least these “private” ones. commented 2026-09-30 02:22:46 UTC by FloxStopr ♦1 |
| 187768976 (Comments: 1) | Cecelia Chen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure the WHOLE building is Natural Healing Path? commented 2026-09-30 01:42:23 UTC by 15419 NE 140th St ♦10 |
| 189750143 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 17) | From note: Added by way of Strava heatmap Thanks for adding the paths! commented 2026-09-30 01:30:36 UTC by O1S ♦37 |
| 10871174 (Comments: 2) | Cartographer1973 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ooh... that was 14 years ago. I can't be sure, but if I added a road name, it most likely came from the Denton County Central Appraisal District (they maintain all the tax records, plats, and so on.) However, they have since removed road layers... commented 2026-09-30 01:17:29 UTC by Cartographer1973 ♦2 |
| 189751250 (Comments: 1) | 66townsend (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please use more descriptive changeset comments. "Fixed" says nothing. commented 2026-09-30 00:30:27 UTC by pkoby ♦132 |
| 189684426 (Comments: 1) | 66townsend (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, in what way did you "fix" the parkway? You deleted a multitude of pieces in favor of one big chunk, but the city database shows the individual pieces. It looks like you, gebowd, and philpennmap (or just you?) have been chipping away at... commented 2026-09-30 00:29:27 UTC by pkoby ♦132 |
| 189544817 (Comments: 1) | Freedomoftheseas (Discussed changesets: 1) | А почему редактирвоано? Дача это не этот дом? commented 2026-09-30 00:14:58 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,765 |
| 189743781 (Comments: 1) | ColectivosdeParaná (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por unirte a OSM! Mil disculpas, pero tuve que revertir los cambios, ya que generaba errores graves de ruteo en muchas aplicaciones. El mapeo de transporte público en OSM no es algo sencillo con lo que empezar. Es m... commented 2026-09-30 00:05:51 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 189749665 (Comments: 1) | germanchelo1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé el conjunto de cambios. La etiqueta reservoir_type=* no me parece correcta. Sin conocer el lugar, por lo que se ve en la imagen satelital, creo que corresponde water=pond. Por cual... commented 2026-09-29 23:41:25 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 181070821 (Comments: 1) | Thomas_112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5544063 ? commented 2026-09-29 23:39:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189709880 (Comments: 1) | JayKay242 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Next time you can just removed the tags you added by mistake rather then the whole building. Thanks commented 2026-09-29 23:33:31 UTC by MassCartog ♦484 |
| 118475468 (Comments: 1) | Jozabal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Se tendrá que borrar esto. Es vandalismo puro commented 2026-09-29 23:25:51 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 122362505 (Comments: 2) | steerage250 (Discussed changesets: 15) | We walked around there. I have a gpx file of my walk and waypoints for the blowholes I can send to you if you'd like. commented 2026-09-29 23:10:31 UTC by steerage250 ♦16 |
| 189565098 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630480 commented 2026-09-29 23:09:36 UTC by Davileci ♦144 |
| 189564941 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630995 commented 2026-09-29 23:08:09 UTC by Davileci ♦144 |
| 189565022 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630995 commented 2026-09-29 23:06:33 UTC by Davileci ♦144 |
| 187882989 (Comments: 2) | Yasenia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Автобусы останавливаются в нескольких местах вдоль дороги с обеих сторон, а не только там где указан автовокзал commented 2026-09-29 23:01:27 UTC by Yasenia ♦1 |
| 182518967 (Comments: 1) | SCMapper9947 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Please note these are already tagged under highway_authority_ref so have been removed from the ref field commented 2026-09-29 22:59:07 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,317 |
| 189749980 (Comments: 1) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 52) | Source: surveyed maxspeeds, lane counts from aerials. Turn lanes at the intersection of Nash and Iron Bridge need to be added once aerials update commented 2026-09-29 22:53:51 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦76 |
 | 132232227 (Comments: 3) | luisforte (Discussed changesets: 18) | Toda a propriedade tem a designação Monte dos Aromas, desde há alguns anos. Obrigado pela correção 🙏 commented 2026-09-29 22:39:34 UTC by Bargao_Henriques ♦1 |
| 189730354 (Comments: 9) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 49) | I agree it probably should be in that segment especially as every router takes folks that way. I'll let it be. commented 2026-09-29 22:16:49 UTC by jjyach ♦43 |
 | 189690414 (Comments: 1) | Македонија (Discussed changesets: 2) | Уставното име на државата е Република Северна Македонија. Големиот патриотизам чувај си го за друго место commented 2026-09-29 21:59:26 UTC by Tiramiso ♦3 |
| 189649677 (Comments: 1) | SP6ZOLW-7 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Każdy zestaw zmian to zmiany. Proszę opisywać co zmieniłeś. commented 2026-09-29 21:54:50 UTC by maro21 ♦948 |
| X | 189729690 (Comments: 1) | Nordpfeil (Discussed changesets: 78) | shifted nodes reverted in 189748851 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189729690 commented 2026-09-29 21:53:22 UTC by aighes ♦62 |
| 179829550 (Comments: 10) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 30) | Ce qui est amusant, c’est qu’à la base je mettais/voulais mettre des path même pour les trottoirs cyclables. Mais c’est toi qui m’a convaincu de passer sur un footway :). Et l... commented 2026-09-29 21:49:19 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦167 |
| 189686101 (Comments: 1) | nortvest (Discussed changesets: 18) | Wurde die Heraufstufung von Diessenhofen als place=town mit der örtlichen Mapping-Eminenz abgesprochen? In der Schweiz gilt meines Wissens die Untergrenze 10k, nur in Ausnahmefällen werden auch Gemeinden, die darunter liegen, aber zugleich ... commented 2026-09-29 21:48:48 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦114 |
| 181821439 (Comments: 3) | Marco Morath (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, bin zu früh auf "enter" gekommen und wollte noch das "Hallo" davorschreiben. Sollte nicht unhöflich klingen :-) (Keine Ahnung, warum das zwei mal abgeschickt wurde) commented 2026-09-29 21:43:09 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦114 |
| 181647701 (Comments: 4) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 136) | Dakujem za upozornenie, ospravedlnujem sa. Nevedel som, ze je nelegalny, ked to niekto oznacil za biketrail. Prosim opravte ako pisete. commented 2026-09-29 21:36:05 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,046 |
| 189650127 (Comments: 2) | Timo_G (Discussed changesets: 6) | Vielen Dank :) commented 2026-09-29 21:27:56 UTC by Timo_G ♦4 |
| 189158484 (Comments: 1) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Warum mussten Sie den Weg 1328113570 löschen? commented 2026-09-29 21:27:33 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦9 |
| 189650412 (Comments: 2) | Timo_G (Discussed changesets: 6) | Jo, vielen Dank. commented 2026-09-29 21:27:06 UTC by Timo_G ♦4 |
| 189517612 (Comments: 1) | mactim1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | A zmiana nazwy na jakiej podstawie? Oraz co to jest OTAR? commented 2026-09-29 21:21:51 UTC by maro21 ♦948 |
| 189745508 (Comments: 1) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Xander, What's your reasoning for this and the other road classification upgrades you've been making in Blue Springs? There haven't been any major design changes to these roads recently and the MoDOT data doesn't ... commented 2026-09-29 21:20:59 UTC by sannkc ♦177 |
| 134120729 (Comments: 2) | aceman444 (Discussed changesets: 136) | Zda sa mi to OK, dakujem. commented 2026-09-29 21:20:08 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,046 |
| 189170819 (Comments: 1) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Auch hier, warum entfernen Sie grundlos building:part von Gebäuden? commented 2026-09-29 21:16:38 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦9 |
| 189104611 (Comments: 2) | Kotarba (Discussed changesets: 8) | 1. W komentarzu przy zapisywaniu zmian podajemy co zmieniliśmy/dodaliśmy na mapie. Komentarz "mój projekt" nie mówi co zmieniłeś lub dodałeś. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian 2... commented 2026-09-29 21:12:54 UTC by maro21 ♦948 |
| 189219846 (Comments: 1) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Was war der Sinn, hier building:part zu entfernen? commented 2026-09-29 21:09:49 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦9 |
| 189600559 (Comments: 1) | Grimreaprincess (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that you moved a bench, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13152134280. Was that intentional or a mistake? Thanks, Peter commented 2026-09-29 21:07:26 UTC by pwbriggs ♦499 |
| 189463633 (Comments: 2) | violette34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Thibault, j'ai justement pris des captures pour que le nom de l'auteur de la photo soit présent mais je ne lui ai pas demandé si je pouvais les utiliser. Si tu préfères supprimer ces photos je compr... commented 2026-09-29 21:06:37 UTC by violette34 ♦1 |
| 189747472 (Comments: 2) | Luke5080 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Adressen heb ik teruggezet. commented 2026-09-29 21:05:18 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189511232 (Comments: 1) | jeka p (Discussed changesets: 124) | Kann es sein, dass bei den Telefonnummern die Landesvorwahl fehlt? commented 2026-09-29 21:01:33 UTC by hlfan ♦121 |
| 189219428 (Comments: 1) | Ellen Bogen (Discussed changesets: 16) | Warum haben Sie hier die Gebäude wieder hinzugefügt? Die wurden abgerissen. Und die Kita war hier auch nicht, sondern die Kirche? commented 2026-09-29 21:00:58 UTC by DerSchmopf ♦9 |
| 189723910 (Comments: 5) | Svenboyy (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Ddelivery commented 2026-09-29 20:55:45 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189307009 (Comments: 2) | kubap2167 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Też jestem szczęśliwy jak prosię https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dodawanie-danych-otwartego-repozytorium-atrakcji-turystycznych/146679/6 https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/791017914525679616/1553079224774959219 commented 2026-09-29 20:54:05 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦707 |
| 159652208 (Comments: 1) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 212) | och mensch ticki... Wieso hast du denn die Blickrichtung des Aussichtspunktes am Wbh Sonnenberghof auf direction=180-360 geändert? Man hat dort nämlich keine Aussicht nach Nordosten und Norden. Die Aussicht ist dort Richtung Süd... commented 2026-09-29 20:49:57 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦114 |
| 189353177 (Comments: 1) | jajko30 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Skąd wiadomo, że wieża ma nazwę własną "Wieża mieszkalna w Biestrzykowie" oraz skąd pochodzi nazwa angielska? commented 2026-09-29 20:35:48 UTC by maro21 ♦948 |
| 189746566 (Comments: 1) | JamesChevalier (Discussed changesets: 7) | 🤔 After checking the Wikipedia page, I'm less sure of this change. Its page notes: > Lordstown is a village and paper township in southern Trumbull County, Ohio, United States. commented 2026-09-29 20:30:50 UTC by JamesChevalier ♦9 |
| 169726031 (Comments: 2) | James McGurk - Glen Coe NNR Ranger (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi James, Since I didn't hear back, I've gone ahead and restored way 1192139769 and put it back into the Ben Nevis Mountain Path and Ben Nevis Trail route relations in changeset 189746427: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1897... commented 2026-09-29 20:25:33 UTC by Kimsey0 ♦1 |
| 188892406 (Comments: 4) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 51) | They are - at least to a subset of people including me. You can directly derive the postcode and linked USRN from them (and then usually other address details from that, which I find handy. They're also good for finding unmapped things (new hous... commented 2026-09-29 20:21:20 UTC by philipcullen ♦43 |
| 154897771 (Comments: 1) | Ricky's Sport Treff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich habe gesehen, dass hier ein Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254694581 mit landuse=retail gemappt wurde. DieserTag soll nur für Gebiete, nicht für einzelne Gebäude verwendet werden. Hier sind sowieso mehrere Gebä... commented 2026-09-29 20:19:01 UTC by pxlframes ♦1 |
| 186186144 (Comments: 1) | Ajtorres317 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera is actually on the east side of South Estrella Parkway, just across the street from the entrance on West Tanglewood Drive. It is pointing South. commented 2026-09-29 20:17:49 UTC by kamodt ♦1 |
| 189098006 (Comments: 1) | SIG Terres des Confluences (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, j'ai rajouté le tag addr:street au numéros adresses. Pour le schéma en noeud, il faut sur chaque adresse (point ou bâtiment) le numéro et la voie orrespondante. Pour le schéma en rel... commented 2026-09-29 20:17:36 UTC by gendy54 ♦613 |
| 185665257 (Comments: 1) | SPG2LD (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi SPG2LD, mir sind https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14010947019 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14010947020 aufgefallen. Hier steht: recycling:glass=track Ich nehme an recycling:glass=yes war gemeint. Möglicherweise ja a... commented 2026-09-29 20:10:11 UTC by lyctkel ♦383 |
| 189711796 (Comments: 1) | fangheshuju (Discussed changesets: 1) | It’s a Vandalism commented 2026-09-29 20:09:38 UTC by Line225 ♦3 |
| 188035150 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 109) | Nämä eivät ole oikeita portteja vaan hidastepuomeja, jotka oli jo kesällä merkitty tasoristeykseen crossing:chicane=yes -tagilla aivan oikein ja se riittää. commented 2026-09-29 20:07:11 UTC by jplahti ♦22 |
| 187770592 (Comments: 1) | vakulya (Discussed changesets: 44) | Úgy látom, hogy félreérted a landuse=residential jelentését. Ezt a címkét nem az egyes háztömbökre, hanem a lakott területre kell használni, vagyis beletartoznak az ... commented 2026-09-29 19:57:01 UTC by BáthoryPéter ♦98 |
| 189736297 (Comments: 1) | DeKoerier (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi .. In dat geval tag je highway=construction construction=footway Dan hoeft die note er niet bij. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-29 19:55:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189412792 (Comments: 7) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 17) | It is two completely different things. Renderers can merge nearby data for display purposes if appropriate for the respective zoom level. They cannot separate it if it is merged into one node. Two Wikidata IDs on the same node also does not work. commented 2026-09-29 19:54:42 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦34 |
| 189736507 (Comments: 1) | openoptimix (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, These tags are default. No need to tag bicycle no and foot=yes on a footway. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-09-29 19:54:36 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189736851 (Comments: 1) | DeKoerier (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dag Koerier, Alle info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-29 19:52:37 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189715874 (Comments: 1) | CGT (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, I've notice a lot of your change-set's comments are not very helpful or descriptive. What does "." mean? what was changed or what was attended to be change. A useful guide can be found on the wiki: https://wiki.ope... commented 2026-09-29 19:50:28 UTC by OneLoneRanger ♦17 |
| 189743062 (Comments: 1) | Ximble (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-29 19:46:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 188177050 (Comments: 2) | Hiki is railing (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi Michael, we understand that bahnhof.de is not to be used any further as a source for track number information, though would like to state that I do not believe our specific use is in violation of the terms specified in their Nutzungs... commented 2026-09-29 19:44:48 UTC by Hiki is railing ♦2 |
| 189728859 (Comments: 1) | Hofmanautomotive (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.. MVG, eggie validator commented 2026-09-29 19:39:20 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189717466 (Comments: 1) | Bobby&Anya (Discussed changesets: 4) | We kennen ook naast species ook species:nl . Dan kun je de Nederlandse naam kwijt. Mapse, commented 2026-09-29 19:36:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189716845 (Comments: 2) | Bobby&Anya (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ahh .. de boom is al volgens de wiki aangepast commented 2026-09-29 19:34:50 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 188011260 (Comments: 1) | XD346 (Discussed changesets: 11) | G228怎么消失了啊？ commented 2026-09-29 19:29:15 UTC by GSF1200S ♦36 |
 | 189743124 (Comments: 1) | Mugur Marin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut. te rog nu mai desenasau repozitiona cladiri dupa imaginile BING deoarece sunt foarte vechi ( mai vechi de 8 ani) si in unele situatii nu sunt suficient de bine centrate. Foloseste MApbox pentru o acuratete buna sau ESRI Standard care sunt din ... commented 2026-09-29 19:28:39 UTC by rarad74 ♦577 |
| 189511513 (Comments: 7) | Suhbeena (Discussed changesets: 4) | That is a tricky spot and the change from a one-way PBL to a two-way painted bike lane is about as well-handled as anything I can think of. commented 2026-09-29 19:20:30 UTC by atticquilt ♦15 |
| 189365959 (Comments: 1) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Hi cubbe8, I'm Artem, the OSM Quality Control lead at Lyft. I have a question about reverting the changes made in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189357892. We realign road geometry and exit location based on recent t... commented 2026-09-29 19:14:35 UTC by amakarevich_lyft ♦39 |
| 110305943 (Comments: 5) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 481) | > so image from node/12599457953 is representative ? Like that, but with less rain outside of Ireland :) I'm not convinced that it's worth documenting as a "different" value, since it dates from before stile vales... commented 2026-09-29 19:01:16 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,884 |
| 164673571 (Comments: 2) | P_kawa (Discussed changesets: 26) | na uzbrojeniu terenu jest oznaczone jako "ko" czyli ogólnospławna. Są to przelewy burzowe, czyli tutaj leci woda z kanalizacji, gdy oczyszczalnia nie wyrabia. commented 2026-09-29 18:52:27 UTC by P_kawa ♦28 |
| 132972771 (Comments: 1) | terminalpreppie (Discussed changesets: 4) | Using modern high-res imagery I was able to find an old diversion dam just upstream. This is the likeliest candidate for this GNIS entry and I merged the tags, but without more historical information I can't be 100% sure. I'd value a second... commented 2026-09-29 18:46:00 UTC by quincylvania ♦92 |
| 189087472 (Comments: 2) | B_KSL (Discussed changesets: 133) | jeszcze trochę nam na później zostało, być może bez dziur tym razem commented 2026-09-29 18:36:48 UTC by B_KSL ♦98 |
| 186584044 (Comments: 1) | FKaindl (Discussed changesets: 11) | Moin, bitte achte vielleicht darauf, (Geh-)Wege, die nicht tatsächlich separat von der eigentlichen Straße sind, nicht als separate Entität zu mappen. z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545693683 Es ist nicht komplett falsc... commented 2026-09-29 18:36:42 UTC by Jbah ♦55 |
| 135222155 (Comments: 1) | Анонимус-2023 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не нужно менять современное название реки на вычитанное со старинных карт. ОСМ содержит данные на сегодняшний день, сейчас это река Стра... commented 2026-09-29 18:27:57 UTC by Takuto ♦56 |
| 189700692 (Comments: 1) | firefighter—>112 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke ;-) Stellst du das water_source noch auf "main" um? Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-29 18:21:41 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 189720101 (Comments: 1) | Yannis23412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, hier müsste die Farbe "red" sein. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-29 18:19:05 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 189372467 (Comments: 2) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 17) | "local observation" was wrong: Vespucci app fills in source with last used, non empty source, I forgot to clear :-( But saddle located in river (impossible: river can not flow over a saddle, on topo maps you can see that river flows ... commented 2026-09-29 18:18:24 UTC by rumbrummer ♦23 |
| 189717221 (Comments: 1) | Yannis23412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, eine einfache Saugstelle - Aufstellort für (P)FPN - ohne feste Verrohrung ist einfach emergency=suction_point, ohne weitere Tags. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-29 18:15:45 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 189664780 (Comments: 4) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hi Hecktor I already found it and have it added, but not used. Now I have used it yes it is very fast especially at rectangular shaped buildings. It is easy to use. BR Thomas commented 2026-09-29 18:13:18 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦53 |
| 189714117 (Comments: 1) | Yannis23412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe hier nur eine Anmerkung: Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerweise leer, da es sich um die &bd... commented 2026-09-29 18:13:12 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 188780439 (Comments: 2) | Toto2642 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Merci pour la correction :) commented 2026-09-29 18:12:47 UTC by Syl ♦1,120 |
| 189728651 (Comments: 1) | TheSYR (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, dein Changeset ist zu groß. Bitte fasse künftig kleinere Gebiete zusammen. Den Namen an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48232248 habe ich wieder entfernt, dieser ist bereits an https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11347700... commented 2026-09-29 18:00:54 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 189719239 (Comments: 1) | witti-42 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, das Unternehmen ist bereits erfasst. Das Erfassen weiterer office bzw. shop und Anflanschen beschreibender Namen ist "Taggen für den Renderer", https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer. Es gib... commented 2026-09-29 17:52:36 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 189725181 (Comments: 2) | Octer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je l'ignorais, merci pour l'info commented 2026-09-29 17:46:28 UTC by Octer ♦2 |
| 189685771 (Comments: 1) | martynie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, welcome to OSM! Thanks for your first edit. I noticed you tagged "The quiet tower" as a peak, which is normally used for mountains and hills. Is this actually a water tower, watch tower, or a building? If you're not sure how to re... commented 2026-09-29 17:44:54 UTC by L4PSA ♦11 |
 | 189623944 (Comments: 3) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 17) | I agree and removed saddle tag in mountain pass duplicate for 2nd lane of road commented 2026-09-29 17:37:50 UTC by rumbrummer ♦23 |
| 189720787 (Comments: 1) | jplahti (Discussed changesets: 6) | hei kiitos tästä! Kävin tässä myymälässä viime viikolla ja sen lisääminen openstreetmapiin oli mun joskus-jonossa :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://o... commented 2026-09-29 17:29:09 UTC by Albe_ ♦19 |
| 189492016 (Comments: 3) | Ben Schwarzmeier (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thx, i fixed it. You can choose "note" in the search field of Organic Maps when you can't find the proper genres commented 2026-09-29 17:05:46 UTC by LySioS ♦160 |
| 189738609 (Comments: 1) | Locomeister (Discussed changesets: 1) | Updated the webadres of this hut at ut.no, the Norwegian Tourist Association commented 2026-09-29 17:04:52 UTC by Locomeister ♦1 |
| 189356159 (Comments: 3) | ianrbuck (Discussed changesets: 5) | Either the width of the whole area or leave it blank. Out of curiosity how do you find width helpful? commented 2026-09-29 16:59:44 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 |
| 189732274 (Comments: 1) | scaalmap (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Scaalmap Thank you for collaborating in the mapping as part of the responde of the Palmar quake. However, I see you didn't put the tags used to identify the affected constructions: damage:date=2026-08-10 damage:event:wiki... commented 2026-09-29 16:50:16 UTC by AngocA ♦245 |
| 189704768 (Comments: 3) | santon (Discussed changesets: 50) | Siehe PM. Die Details will ich hier nicht breit treten. commented 2026-09-29 16:39:19 UTC by ToniE ♦1,288 |
| 189737187 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 469) | And some more. I have to get the hang of the new function to geographically split changesets sets in Go Map!! commented 2026-09-29 16:36:29 UTC by habi ♦2,270 |
 | 189698613 (Comments: 4) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | Reife Leistung :) commented 2026-09-29 16:24:28 UTC by chris66 ♦508 |
| 189698554 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 85) | Работното време съм го добавил в changeset/157976335 преди 2 години. Тогава го пишеше на входа. commented 2026-09-29 16:10:03 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,045 |
| 189618948 (Comments: 1) | Yurch12386 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Зачем этот пешеходный переход если уже есть node/14066174008 ? commented 2026-09-29 16:05:24 UTC by morkovkin ♦15 |
| 189341980 (Comments: 1) | Yurch12386 (Discussed changesets: 3) | hazard=pedestrians используется только если это отдельно обозначено, а так это highway=crossing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hazard=pedestrians commented 2026-09-29 16:03:02 UTC by morkovkin ♦15 |
| 168463562 (Comments: 2) | mycota (Discussed changesets: 15) | You're right - it should be "no". I've fixed it. Thanks for letting me know. commented 2026-09-29 16:02:25 UTC by mycota ♦15 |
| 189660333 (Comments: 1) | ИраШ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте. В названиях улиц указывают родовое слово. Например, Светлая улица. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именов... commented 2026-09-29 15:54:13 UTC by mavl ♦77,108 |
| 189708462 (Comments: 1) | primesepticservice (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Reverting SEO spam... commented 2026-09-29 15:53:51 UTC by Glassman ♦6,043 |
| 189592395 (Comments: 3) | kaartenliefhebber (Discussed changesets: 12) | 👍 commented 2026-09-29 15:51:42 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 163920200 (Comments: 2) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 404) | Hi, I've fixed the typo. It's sometimes hard to know whether a tag should be in singular or plural. commented 2026-09-29 15:45:28 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,219 |
| 189663290 (Comments: 1) | Yurch12386 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 1. Камера - это не название https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Имя_–_это_название_и_только 2. office=chamber это вообще "Офис Профессиональной п... commented 2026-09-29 15:33:31 UTC by morkovkin ♦15 |
| 189707122 (Comments: 1) | BenW2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the contribution. Are you sure that the height is right? Note that the measurement unit for height=* is meters, not feet. commented 2026-09-29 15:32:55 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦19 |
| 189729007 (Comments: 4) | Carloh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hier wird übrigens darüber gerade diskutiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ich-bitte-mal-um-meinungen-bei-diesem-hinweis und du bist gerne eingeladen commented 2026-09-29 15:32:03 UTC by uvi ♦152 |
| 189249923 (Comments: 1) | GhostHorsti (Discussed changesets: 1) | CS reverted commented 2026-09-29 15:30:56 UTC by hsc666 ♦497 |
| 189734475 (Comments: 1) | geo-d (Discussed changesets: 36) | Die Route wurde hier wohl irrtümlich über den Bürgersteig geführt, korrigiert mit Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189734475. commented 2026-09-29 15:29:53 UTC by geo-d ♦31 |
| 187833428 (Comments: 1) | nicatxo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, pas d'accord avec votre cotation des CVCB (hausquette, acacias...) : il s'agit de simples rives ou accotements sur lesquels les motorisés peuvent rouler ou stationner contrairement aux bandes cyclables, le marquage se limita... commented 2026-09-29 15:22:36 UTC by txominH ♦6 |
| 33720756 (Comments: 1) | MicDK (Discussed changesets: 75) | Jeg mistænker at tunnelen way/368585554 ikke eksisterer, og at vejen fungerer som vandskel mellem Hovedrenden og Lundby Bæk. Det antyder højdekortet i hvert fald. Desuden: Ifølge kortoverblik.dk ender Lundby Bæk... commented 2026-09-29 15:09:42 UTC by cyclist789 ♦135 |
| 189574560 (Comments: 2) | Slartibartfast141 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you. It's a typo I sometimes make from auto-complete in JOSM... At least I'm blaming JOSM. Either way I should pay a little more attention. commented 2026-09-29 15:08:23 UTC by Slartibartfast141 ♦5 |
| 189702728 (Comments: 2) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 114) | Nope, it’s been blocked off and pedestrian signals removed, i’ve mapped the new crosswalk locations as under construction. commented 2026-09-29 15:04:27 UTC by cubbe8 ♦111 |
| 189732730 (Comments: 1) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 39) | correction: "direction" moved to "destination:forward". commented 2026-09-29 14:55:53 UTC by Biff ♦29 |
| 189723895 (Comments: 4) | fx99 (Discussed changesets: 84) | siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5545788#map=18/48.600480/8.870159&layers=N commented 2026-09-29 14:54:54 UTC by fx99 ♦137 |
| 189729554 (Comments: 1) | kr3vitz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian jest błędny i został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 14:38:21 UTC by bartgron ♦673 |
| 189319977 (Comments: 3) | lanroamer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah, makes sense, wouldn't bother using GPX tracks in the UK. We have the cadastral parcels that have near perfect alignment that can be used to align imagery. Always check mapbox and esri imagery for any newer developments in case they've b... commented 2026-09-29 14:33:32 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189481784 (Comments: 1) | Vuiser (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2026-09-29 14:29:31 UTC by StC ♦535 |
| 189716843 (Comments: 2) | Arranus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, I see. Thank you for letting me know commented 2026-09-29 14:29:08 UTC by Arranus ♦2 |
| 189719304 (Comments: 2) | Arranus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh sorry! I didn't see the other comments you had left! I will keep this in mind commented 2026-09-29 14:25:43 UTC by Arranus ♦2 |
| 189724307 (Comments: 1) | Zach Brown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the edits! In this case I believe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate is a more accurate value. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno implies it is illegal for _anybody_ to use these servic... commented 2026-09-29 14:13:02 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦19 |
| 189704707 (Comments: 1) | 68916 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I removed the more specific opening_date from Beltline Station. The name is misleading; it's a residential project separate from the transit line commented 2026-09-29 14:07:15 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 |
| 169346113 (Comments: 1) | Balázs Hidvégi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416753924 parking:left=parking:left? That does not look te be correct to me. commented 2026-09-29 13:59:04 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 189705279 (Comments: 1) | 68916 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi 68916, house looks to be misspelled for many of these. You might also want to use the more specific building=detached commented 2026-09-29 13:52:00 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 |
| 188642372 (Comments: 1) | wildmaps (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi, could you check this node, the house number is missing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14158562687 commented 2026-09-29 13:47:52 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 183597505 (Comments: 1) | napo (Discussed changesets: 10) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23808336 parking:left=right? That can't be correct. Should that maybe be parking:right=yes or one of the other values named in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Parking_positio... commented 2026-09-29 13:47:48 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 189502388 (Comments: 1) | Elodie La Vallée du Kiwi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Coucou, ça va ? est-ce que courriel, facebook, téléphoen et siret sont les mêmes ? à plus commented 2026-09-29 13:38:20 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,344 |
| 189646867 (Comments: 2) | SereneDeluge (Discussed changesets: 3) | :D commented 2026-09-29 13:37:22 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦34 |
| 189683464 (Comments: 7) | Hervé Bourne (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci @aurelien pour cette correction qui pour l'instant n'est pas encore visible, mais attendons un peu. commented 2026-09-29 13:34:18 UTC by Hervé Bourne ♦2 |
| 189157826 (Comments: 1) | kb_lee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I am not on-site, but access=customer on a road from the national road network seems bizarre to me. I understand access=customer as basically for private roads giving access to an amenity (e.g. restaurant) . I was about to remove the access ... commented 2026-09-29 13:28:04 UTC by brunesto ♦15 |
 | 189727984 (Comments: 1) | siwangi02 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Shouldn't the trees be an forest or orchard cover (area) instead? commented 2026-09-29 13:27:49 UTC by imiraldz ♦7 |
| 186885832 (Comments: 1) | tesp (Discussed changesets: 35) | Tuo ref=1 oli VR:n reittinumero aikataulukirjasesta. Ei kovin yleisesti enää tiedossa oleva asia, mutta yhä käytössä. commented 2026-09-29 13:26:54 UTC by jplahti ♦22 |
| 189723696 (Comments: 1) | imiraldz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks good! Ty for adding this information! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189723696 commented 2026-09-29 13:19:41 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189608674 (Comments: 5) | jabu29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zarówno odcinek przy Przemysłowej ma takie błędne tagowanie jak i odcinek ulicy bez nazwy prostopadłej do Przemysłowej. commented 2026-09-29 12:50:27 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,494 |
| 189697726 (Comments: 1) | bentzy (Discussed changesets: 37) | יש כבר נקודה של מצפור השייטת. בבקשה לא ליצור נקודות כפולות. commented 2026-09-29 12:38:19 UTC by hatul ♦532 |
| 189498229 (Comments: 4) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 44) | Dokładna wysokość nad poziomem morza według portalu wynosi 356,8 m n.p.m. commented 2026-09-29 12:37:35 UTC by palycka ♦4 |
| 189722269 (Comments: 1) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 169) | Ooops! Thanks commented 2026-09-29 12:26:49 UTC by Dezza ♦36 |
| 189697019 (Comments: 1) | johnysfajczony (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dodany tag jest zbędny i został usunięty. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:26:13 UTC by bartgron ♦673 |
| 189719927 (Comments: 1) | PPowroznik (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Nie używamy Google jako źródła do mapowania. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:19:49 UTC by bartgron ♦673 |
| 189663855 (Comments: 1) | blmarek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zestaw zmian jest błędny i został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:14:55 UTC by bartgron ♦673 |
| 186762814 (Comments: 2) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:08:31 UTC by bartgron ♦673 |
| 186368034 (Comments: 1) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:06:20 UTC by bartgron ♦673 |
| 189345703 (Comments: 1) | Cello_Bello (Discussed changesets: 3) | have you seen https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/10 ? can you respond to it? commented 2026-09-29 12:05:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189723071 (Comments: 1) | nemca (Discussed changesets: 23) | Salut. Nu mai folosi imaginile Bing deoarece sunt foarte vechi. Foloseste ESRI Standard sau Mapbox. commented 2026-09-29 12:04:28 UTC by rarad74 ♦577 |
| 189622409 (Comments: 1) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:02:28 UTC by bartgron ♦673 |
| 189718040 (Comments: 2) | Morswin_PL (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam commented 2026-09-29 12:00:17 UTC by bartgron ♦673 |
| 189589004 (Comments: 1) | OneLoneRanger (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thank you. Not sure how I managed to duplicate the stop. Carelessness, probably. commented 2026-09-29 11:57:08 UTC by EdLoach ♦182 |
| 120828543 (Comments: 1) | Hike39 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ein "kleiner" Fehler in diesem Änderrungssatz hat es ins Fernsehen geschafft. https://youtu.be/fuNHmkqNfBQ?t=146 ;-) commented 2026-09-29 11:53:46 UTC by tyr_asd ♦473 |
| 182333466 (Comments: 5) | Tntdruid (Discussed changesets: 76) | @cyclist789 der er ingen mountainbikerute i Naturnationalpark Gribskov. commented 2026-09-29 11:40:03 UTC by kortgodt ♦123 |
| 189443505 (Comments: 1) | LARYSA4587 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Вы разорвали границу полигонов, будьте внимательны. На данный момент исправил commented 2026-09-29 11:29:17 UTC by abnafch ♦1 |
| 189721517 (Comments: 1) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 23) | Nice work! commented 2026-09-29 11:23:27 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,126 |
| 189498704 (Comments: 1) | peter_dedo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pozerám že ste odstránili tagy highway a surface z námestia. No ja by som to vrátil, námestie naozaj má povrch sett https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=sett?uselang=sk a highway=ped... commented 2026-09-29 11:07:31 UTC by EfreetSK ♦33 |
| 189696411 (Comments: 1) | kellandagoat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189721304 commented 2026-09-29 11:02:09 UTC by MappingMore ♦751 |
| 189719407 (Comments: 1) | Cambellbarton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not add personal markers like this to the map. It has been deleted. commented 2026-09-29 10:49:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,351 |
| 189681111 (Comments: 1) | Ignasi Cervera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189720726 commented 2026-09-29 10:48:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189543322 (Comments: 5) | Pedritope (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ok, muchas gracias por la información. commented 2026-09-29 10:48:25 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189691259 (Comments: 1) | Pedritope (Discussed changesets: 8) | Además, por favor cuadrar lo que dibujas con lo que se observa en el satélite, cada casa por separado, sin agrupar. Aquí como que pusiste poligonos arriba de donde hay casas, pero no hacemos dibujos esquemáticos. Salu2 ... commented 2026-09-29 10:48:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189691308 (Comments: 1) | Pedritope (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hola. Las casas las puedes cuadrar con la letra Q. las que agregas están obviamente hechas a pulso. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189691308 commented 2026-09-29 10:47:02 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189676083 (Comments: 4) | matt_the_bat (Discussed changesets: 7) | Die untere Treppe ist meiner Erinnerung nach per Schild "Durchgang verboten" gesperrt. Kannst ja nochmal genauer nachsehen, wenn du mal wieder dort vorbei kommst. :-) commented 2026-09-29 10:36:55 UTC by whb ♦669 |
| 189718160 (Comments: 1) | chefche (Discussed changesets: 6) | Servus, in JOSM gibt es für diesen Bereich die "Aktuelle Luftbilder der Landeshauptstadt München 20cm". Die sind genauer und korrekt = exakt ausgerichtet. Gruß Toni commented 2026-09-29 10:14:29 UTC by ToniE ♦1,288 |
| 189679149 (Comments: 1) | Matheus_Santos (Discussed changesets: 1) | CEP 32677-024 Rua N - Imbiruçu - Betim/MG a Rua N ainda não mudou de nome commented 2026-09-29 10:13:58 UTC by Lucas Santana ♦14 |
| 164061672 (Comments: 3) | DerKaiserschmarren (Discussed changesets: 56) | :) commented 2026-09-29 10:05:48 UTC by DerKaiserschmarren ♦77 |
| 189480701 (Comments: 1) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 17) | I believe with "Col de la Tourne" you once again made an error. Using the open Swiss Lidar data available, one can once again determine that the road is higher. The actual mountain pass is tagged here: https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-09-29 10:05:48 UTC by KartKollektor ♦45 |
| 189716365 (Comments: 1) | tyroleanDave (Discussed changesets: 4) | Da wäre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling passender? commented 2026-09-29 10:01:46 UTC by fs_LT ♦242 |
| 173556281 (Comments: 1) | user_msh (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, Pour quoi avoir mis SNCF Réseau comme operator sur des luminaires urbains (hors emprise ferroviaire) ? commented 2026-09-29 09:57:02 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦106 |
| 189670522 (Comments: 4) | Stephanievanr (Discussed changesets: 11) | instead *of using .. commented 2026-09-29 09:53:34 UTC by Enock4seth ♦685 |
| 184067670 (Comments: 1) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 67) | Hi Harald, you removed this as a "false saddle" here. While reviewing, I saw that this was restored now, and the elevation changed to 1048m. I already asked for the source of this change; but I'd like to invite you to ... commented 2026-09-29 09:49:45 UTC by KartKollektor ♦45 |
| 188636577 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 166) | Hi, you used the tag "fire_bucket" here. To me these look rather like buckets with sand to bind spilled oil. In any case, I don't know of a tag that is already in use for those. commented 2026-09-29 09:48:17 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 189661062 (Comments: 1) | ranjitadhikari (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189717748 commented 2026-09-29 09:43:54 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189623316 (Comments: 1) | Alikalik13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Marketplace doesn't seem an appropriate tag for this. Whole area "Centrāltirgus" is a single marketplace. For individual sellers shop might be better, preferably clarifying the type of products sold. commented 2026-09-29 09:39:47 UTC by kaposts ♦26 |
| 189176470 (Comments: 1) | Giopogib (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Giopogib, your recent changeset have created several errors regarding invalid, self intersecting landuse areas/relations: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.01847&lat=45.60981&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%2... commented 2026-09-29 09:29:23 UTC by gscholz ♦3,003 |
| 189422087 (Comments: 1) | Giopogib (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Giopogib, your recent changeset have created several errors regarding invalid, self intersecting landuse areas/relations: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.01847&lat=45.60981&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%2... commented 2026-09-29 09:29:15 UTC by gscholz ♦3,003 |
| 189664482 (Comments: 1) | Binky Bunny (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has changed addr:city=Nottingham to addr:city=Annesley when the most common use of addr:city in the UK is to match the postal town https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... commented 2026-09-29 09:22:09 UTC by Dave Venables ♦187 |
 | 189415841 (Comments: 2) | hatul (Discussed changesets: 46) | חשבתי שעדיף אחידות באנגלית כמו בעברית (חניון לילה). אם אתה חושב שעדיף כמו בשטח מוזמן לתקן וכדאי להוסיף note שמבקש לא לשנות. commented 2026-09-29 09:13:21 UTC by hatul ♦532 |
| 189715363 (Comments: 1) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thank you. commented 2026-09-29 09:10:27 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,269 |
| 157557886 (Comments: 1) | morgy2810 (Discussed changesets: 1) | What indications are there that this is a helipad? From above it doesn't resemble one in any way. commented 2026-09-29 09:09:48 UTC by mackerski ♦39 |
 | 189686195 (Comments: 1) | YamJp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189716280 commented 2026-09-29 09:01:35 UTC by MappingMore ♦751 |
| 178238779 (Comments: 1) | NxPFoto (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hallo NxPFoto, deine Achterbahn besteht aus einer Linie, die sich mehrfach selbst überschneidet: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.77622&lat=48.97475&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=... commented 2026-09-29 08:56:40 UTC by gscholz ♦3,003 |
| 189661400 (Comments: 2) | trailschneck (Discussed changesets: 68) | Sorry, hatte ich nicht gesehen. Ich sehe aber die Busse immer nur weiter vorne am Bahnhof reinfahren. Ich behalte es mal im Auge. commented 2026-09-29 08:54:44 UTC by trailschneck ♦54 |
| 189416429 (Comments: 2) | hatul (Discussed changesets: 46) | מוזמן למחוק, אני רק תיקנתי קישור commented 2026-09-29 08:52:28 UTC by hatul ♦532 |
| 186489236 (Comments: 2) | simonc11 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I have reopened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5419658 because I am unconvinced the defibrilator is mapped correctly and the mapper has ignored my question. commented 2026-09-29 08:52:19 UTC by tomhukins ♦303 |
| 189489225 (Comments: 2) | JTS51 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Dag UL-mapper, bedankt voor jou reactie. Positieve opmerkingen houden mij scherp. Ik kan mij niet meer herinneren iets te hebben verwijderd wat niet nodig was. Goed dat het weer is hersteld. Met groet, JTS51 commented 2026-09-29 08:50:09 UTC by JTS51 ♦5 |
| 188309067 (Comments: 1) | PA_Barre (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi PA_Barre, your recent activities have destroyed the boundary relation of "Parco dei Sicani": https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.45388&lat=37.64658&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overl... commented 2026-09-29 08:49:26 UTC by gscholz ♦3,003 |
| 178994197 (Comments: 2) | RJ Lerng (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you very much for letting me know and correcting them for me! Cheers! commented 2026-09-29 08:47:34 UTC by RJ Lerng ♦8 |
| 188680443 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 49) | Bonjour, l'URL renseignée pointait vers le site web de Nissan Saint-Lô, installés dans le même batiment. Pour le moment aucun site web n'est indiqué pour MG Motor. commented 2026-09-29 08:45:05 UTC by Digitaleo ♦50 |
| 80279900 (Comments: 1) | Aldeyde (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ciao, il Ponte sull'Oggioletta siamo sicuri che richieda di essere scalato? Vedi nota https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5545082 commented 2026-09-29 08:40:38 UTC by Una tantum ♦37 |
| 189699874 (Comments: 1) | javico122 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189715366 commented 2026-09-29 08:39:48 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189685988 (Comments: 1) | gergeti2010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding the hotel! Please note that the address information in Georgia should be specified in Georgian. Also, if the hotel has a Georgian name, it should be placed in the main name field, while the English name should be placed in th... commented 2026-09-29 08:39:39 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189714548 (Comments: 1) | scalvia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tips: Bisa menambahkan beberapa bangunan dulu baru kemudian diunggah. commented 2026-09-29 08:36:28 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189676018 (Comments: 1) | matt_the_bat (Discussed changesets: 7) | Guten Tag, ist das nicht (zumindest teilweise) eigentlich eine Treppe statt eines Weges? Viele Grüße whb commented 2026-09-29 08:09:02 UTC by whb ♦669 |
| 188192688 (Comments: 1) | dindidindi (Discussed changesets: 2) | This address doesn't appear to exist walking down Market Street; could you add more detail or refine its location? commented 2026-09-29 08:06:24 UTC by twassman ♦2 |
| 188994954 (Comments: 2) | MatteoD_velo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok très bien merci, nous avons effectivement déplacé la bande cyclable qui était dans le meme sens de circulation pour la mettre de l'autre côté afin de créer un double sens cyclable. Il s'agi... commented 2026-09-29 08:05:27 UTC by MatteoD_velo ♦1 |
| 189713160 (Comments: 1) | aLIexis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-29 08:03:02 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189713579 (Comments: 1) | newdevchristine (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2026-09-29 08:00:35 UTC by newdevchristine ♦4 |
| 189712435 (Comments: 1) | newdevchristine (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2026-09-29 08:00:09 UTC by newdevchristine ♦4 |
| 189712533 (Comments: 1) | newdevchristine (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2026-09-29 07:59:49 UTC by newdevchristine ♦4 |
| 189713163 (Comments: 1) | newdevchristine (Discussed changesets: 4) | 👍 commented 2026-09-29 07:59:22 UTC by newdevchristine ♦4 |
| 189698855 (Comments: 1) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 17) | The duplicate node you linked is *not* a duplicate saddle point, just a mountain pass. Additionally, the deleted node is _also_ a mountain pass, just for the other lane of the node. Looking through the history, it was adjusted according to ... commented 2026-09-29 07:50:50 UTC by KartKollektor ♦45 |
 | 189713085 (Comments: 1) | Shirley Mukusi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Task number: 47 changeset number:65253 number of features added: 83 task status: completed commented 2026-09-29 07:46:09 UTC by Shirley Mukusi ♦1 |
| 189661687 (Comments: 3) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 17) | Good, thanks. Please review things more closely before you change them - I noticed that in the history of exactly this "Mendlingenpass" _you_ already did a change 1 year ago that you then reverted - EXACTLY the same situtation (see h... commented 2026-09-29 07:42:36 UTC by KartKollektor ♦45 |
| 189707511 (Comments: 2) | Tomas Straupis (Discussed changesets: 92) | Ten šaligatvis, o ne atskiras kelias. Daug tiek Vilniuj, tiek už Vilniaus ribų tokių primakaroninta, tai čia dar bus daug darbo visus juos išvalyt, kai rankos prieis. commented 2026-09-29 07:41:35 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,128 |
| 189710894 (Comments: 1) | gormo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Moin hier ist die Löschung dann bestimmt gerechtfertigt grüße aus Korbach silversurfer83 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189710894 ... commented 2026-09-29 07:35:38 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,361 |
| 189709140 (Comments: 3) | HVeenker (Discussed changesets: 2) | PB met welkom gestuurd. commented 2026-09-29 07:30:42 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189709054 (Comments: 1) | HVeenker (Discussed changesets: 2) | Herzlich Willkommen bei OSM, Ein Name macht niets in OSM.. Vielleicht office=company hinzufügen? Grüss, eggie commented 2026-09-29 07:30:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189702820 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, In your edit you used the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please STOP using the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants... commented 2026-09-29 07:28:48 UTC by Comino ♦416 |
| 189246701 (Comments: 3) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 653) | Pytanie zapewne brzmiało "Czy znajduje się tutaj droga rowerowa? Jakiego typu?". https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148525734 to jedynie chodnik, gdzie można jechać powoli rowerem, ustępując pierwszeństwa pieszym i nawet nie ma obowi... commented 2026-09-29 07:27:34 UTC by YomanNH ♦543 |
| 189709260 (Comments: 2) | jam22x44 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dankjewel! Ik zal de gestuurde info doorlezen. commented 2026-09-29 07:26:54 UTC by jam22x44 ♦1 |
| 189707791 (Comments: 1) | palasah (Discussed changesets: 3) | Halo, jika ini adalah gang, penggunaan "jalur sepeda" itu kurang tepat ya. Label sebelumnya itu sekiranya sudah benar. commented 2026-09-29 07:24:34 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189702767 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, In your edit you used the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please STOP using the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants... commented 2026-09-29 07:24:08 UTC by Comino ♦416 |
| 189710642 (Comments: 1) | _John_Doe_ (Discussed changesets: 4) | have you consider office=logistics? commented 2026-09-29 07:22:23 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 184783171 (Comments: 1) | tyr_asd (Discussed changesets: 57) | Schade, es wurden also nachträglich doch wieder Tempo-50-Schilder angebracht und somit der Lückenschluss wieder rückgängig gemacht. commented 2026-09-29 07:22:08 UTC by whb ♦669 |
| 189711711 (Comments: 1) | Lord_Gaav (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Lord Gaav, Er is al een officiële adresnode nr 4. Daar heb ik de info mee samengevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-29 07:19:54 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 186445006 (Comments: 4) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi Allroads, thank you for the further explanation. We’ll keep in mind if we encounter similar short segments with unique attributes. One point from my previous question is still unanswered: could you please share some more information or do... commented 2026-09-29 07:17:36 UTC by Gorger ♦60 |
| 189702721 (Comments: 1) | Bitcoin Amantikir (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, In your edit you used the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please STOP using the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants... commented 2026-09-29 07:16:40 UTC by Comino ♦416 |
| 159037153 (Comments: 1) | Antonio_Portiere (Discussed changesets: 19) | why did you make them as culvert when the roads already is bridge? commented 2026-09-29 07:08:55 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189711273 (Comments: 1) | gardenworm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Note to self, I later found this shop a couple shop fronts down. I need to revert this edit on the computer. The icecream shop is correct. The myspec ship is next to the Messina on the east. commented 2026-09-29 06:57:17 UTC by gardenworm ♦1 |
| 189668549 (Comments: 1) | Mahir Floral & Event Designs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189711423 commented 2026-09-29 06:49:50 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189710471 (Comments: 1) | gormo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Moin :) ist natürlich auch ein wenig mein Fehler, dass ich das noch nicht angepasst habe. Trotzdem mein Hinweis: Bitte nutze in Zukunft bei solchen Objekten Lebenszyklus Präfixe um die Geschichte des nodes zu erhalten. Meine l... commented 2026-09-29 06:44:57 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,361 |
| 188391645 (Comments: 2) | HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi @lyctkel , Thanks. I fixed it. commented 2026-09-29 06:40:00 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦287 |
| 189484757 (Comments: 5) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Ist ok. Ist öfter so. Hab hier eine Kneipe/Gasthaus gehabt, das sehr lange von außen noch alles dran hatte weshalb ich den Namen auch noch dran gelassen hatte. commented 2026-09-29 06:23:43 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,361 |
| 189620255 (Comments: 1) | Guscardoso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189708658 commented 2026-09-29 06:19:49 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189632163 (Comments: 1) | mclibra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189706311 commented 2026-09-29 06:19:11 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189633852 (Comments: 1) | Oliverextermina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189705658 commented 2026-09-29 06:17:53 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189614996 (Comments: 1) | Naturraumkarte (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189705744 commented 2026-09-29 06:17:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189626039 (Comments: 1) | KETRINOS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189685620 commented 2026-09-29 06:16:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| X | 189641804 (Comments: 1) | NURI ISLOM Oltinov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189684904 commented 2026-09-29 06:15:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189646870 (Comments: 1) | dayux (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189671187 commented 2026-09-29 06:15:15 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189639115 (Comments: 1) | Prakreeti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189670858 commented 2026-09-29 06:14:48 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189641544 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 37) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189668875 commented 2026-09-29 06:14:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189634825 (Comments: 1) | LunesArgent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189659727 commented 2026-09-29 06:13:40 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189634935 (Comments: 1) | מוטיס (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189710076 commented 2026-09-29 06:08:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦751 |
| 162840296 (Comments: 2) | claudia10 (Discussed changesets: 53) | I added e to them based on changeset description commented 2026-09-29 06:07:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189695023 (Comments: 3) | YGSON (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thx @caprieldeluca commented 2026-09-29 06:06:37 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189692533 (Comments: 1) | Maria Eduarda Sousa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189709547#map=10/-0.9680/-47.8862 commented 2026-09-29 05:55:52 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189612140 (Comments: 1) | AE35 (Discussed changesets: 62) | Kan kun være for at please en statistik commented 2026-09-29 05:44:29 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,931 |
| 189661114 (Comments: 1) | LaundryWise Dev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Isn’t supposed to be a commercial area instead? commented 2026-09-29 05:38:24 UTC by imiraldz ♦7 |
 | 189690199 (Comments: 1) | AvdiWè (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189708826 commented 2026-09-29 05:28:54 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 186113989 (Comments: 4) | wwjd2022 (Discussed changesets: 14) | thx! :)) commented 2026-09-29 05:16:10 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦419 |
| 189679715 (Comments: 1) | 3alei (Discussed changesets: 8) | Пожалуйста не используйте дороги типа _link там где их нет. Почитайте пожалуйста wiki про линки, там описано где ставятся и какие конкретно к... commented 2026-09-29 05:04:35 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,294 |
| 189698957 (Comments: 1) | Vikingen på cykel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tilbageført. Tilladelse til cykel er tilføjet med "bicycle=yes". commented 2026-09-29 05:00:34 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,931 |
| 189502052 (Comments: 1) | JungeHL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ich habe deine Änderung etwas korrigiert. Du solltest Wege nicht im Nirvana enden lassen, sonst können Routing-Software wie z.B. Komoot keine vernünftigen Routen finden. commented 2026-09-29 04:48:41 UTC by tomek11 ♦13 |
| 189652977 (Comments: 1) | eegeebs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189707566 commented 2026-09-29 04:37:51 UTC by MappingMore ♦751 |
| 189678632 (Comments: 1) | Portage Liquors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189707055 commented 2026-09-29 04:16:57 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189646279 (Comments: 1) | aidem74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189706934 commented 2026-09-29 04:10:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189652903 (Comments: 3) | Alex-P (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oh god, I can very much understand your motivation now lol. commented 2026-09-29 03:30:22 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 185086997 (Comments: 7) | ZenBiddist (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I resolved this error in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189704525#map=16/-33.73468/150.27986&layers=N using the higher cliffline for part of Megalong Valley and Narrow Neck boundaries. commented 2026-09-29 01:47:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,351 |
| 189544995 (Comments: 2) | Kharandesert (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Josemar Bezerra Junior, Thanks for letting me know! commented 2026-09-29 01:20:48 UTC by Kharandesert ♦3 |
| 175856750 (Comments: 1) | fsck (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera was cut down and destroyed. commented 2026-09-29 01:08:50 UTC by wilkems ♦2 |
| 175174329 (Comments: 1) | Apoapsis (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera is no longer present. commented 2026-09-29 01:08:24 UTC by wilkems ♦2 |
| 188413944 (Comments: 2) | bmdsbmds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Other ways in this area already map suitable trails for hiking like the rainbow-madeley trail and informal trails up rainbow moutain and to beverley lake commented 2026-09-29 00:14:08 UTC by ScottNelson ♦26 |
 | 189652745 (Comments: 1) | نصرقائداحمدالهلالي (Discussed changesets: 4) | قرية ضريبه العرش هي إحدى قرى الجمهورية اليمنية وتتبع جغرافيا محافظة البيضاء وادريا مديرية العرش منطقة رداع عدد سكانها 2363 نسمة إحصاء 2004.و... commented 2026-09-28 23:51:00 UTC by نصرقائداحمدالهلالي ♦4 |
| 187767970 (Comments: 1) | ganchan183 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 大鹿村鹿塩梨原周辺の林道中峰黒川線は舗装されている公道ですので、タグは「track」から「minor」に戻します。編集するまえにぜひ場所と道の現況をご確認をお願い致します。どうぞよ... commented 2026-09-28 23:40:42 UTC by bananapan ♦1 |
| 189594692 (Comments: 9) | malifica (Discussed changesets: 12) | Apology accepted. Thanks malifica. I thought we were in agreement on most things as well so I was a little surprised by this thread. Glad to hear we're back on the same page. And I'm thrilled to hear that those tools can handle multipolygon... commented 2026-09-28 23:37:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦954 |
| 189676878 (Comments: 12) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | Dear Enbyperor, OSM is not a project where one should start a big mapping campaign or data import because "so one night, at a random hackspace on the 25th of august, we were bored" (quoting from your "Hiki is railing" diary). At m... commented 2026-09-28 23:09:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189701847 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 131) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189651978, 189653751, 189654539, 189654550, 189654553, 189654557, 189654603, 189654605, 189654610, 189654617, 189654621, 189654625, 189654669, 189654679, 189654726, 189654729, 189654735, 189... commented 2026-09-28 22:57:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189701857 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 131) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189651978, 189653751, 189654539, 189654550, 189654553, 189654557, 189654603, 189654605, 189654610, 189654617, 189654621, 189654625, 189654669, 189654679, 189654726, 189654729, 189654735, 189... commented 2026-09-28 22:57:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189672091 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673291 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189676775 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654669 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673236 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694621 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678883 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694774 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694770 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189688905 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189682645 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694633 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189684396 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680113 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189698237 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694801 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666114 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673331 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680151 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694885 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673158 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673127 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694698 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654605 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673174 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673216 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189665842 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189687376 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189665653 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:57:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189668371 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189686187 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666118 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673224 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654603 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189684492 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
 | 189677956 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678355 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673136 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189681183 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666019 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654726 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189665668 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654679 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680185 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654539 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189686811 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669650 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189688931 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694709 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189684536 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189698285 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189698592 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694786 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189679311 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189676893 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678178 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189685382 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678581 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189682654 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:54 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189676826 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654625 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673167 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189668387 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669473 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:53 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654735 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189651978 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189684553 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189671834 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673244 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694662 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654553 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189684424 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680086 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666047 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:51 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680067 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:50 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669980 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:50 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678996 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:50 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654610 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:50 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654617 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:50 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654621 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:50 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669656 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189653751 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680163 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673182 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189676741 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678665 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:48 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189687363 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:48 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189679293 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:48 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666067 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:48 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189684479 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:48 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694831 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:47 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189665834 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:47 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189665995 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:47 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654550 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666081 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654557 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189665641 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694782 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:46 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189698265 (Comments: 2) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669635 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694854 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189696102 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189687344 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189688895 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:45 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654729 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189684442 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189676870 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654743 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669683 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189687359 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189668359 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189671843 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669702 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673310 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:43 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673321 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680122 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189665676 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189686160 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669646 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:42 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189685921 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678616 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:41 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694844 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694903 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694840 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673541 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:40 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666124 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694738 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189696128 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673271 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189698272 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669502 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189673256 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189687353 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694869 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680058 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694797 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666055 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694713 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678061 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189681208 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189698601 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189694756 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669926 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189678847 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189688901 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669489 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189680781 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189684460 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189686200 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666096 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189669461 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666031 (Comments: 1) | TheEnbyperor (Discussed changesets: 154) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 189701847, 189701857 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-09-28 22:56:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189691960 (Comments: 4) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 212) | Das wäre bei ticki nichts Neues (seufz). Und bevor er auch nur einen Funken Einsicht zeigt und kurz innehält, wird er zickig und versucht, mit kruden Unterstellungen und flapsigen Bemerkungen einen auf starken Max zu machen. Selbst w... commented 2026-09-28 22:28:13 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦114 |
| 188429617 (Comments: 6) | crfdude (Discussed changesets: 1) | I made a change, you might look and see if I did it correctly. commented 2026-09-28 22:27:14 UTC by ADVPS ♦1 |
| 173528749 (Comments: 3) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 447) | if this info can be expressed by other it is still a new ( https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/location=aboveground ) duplicate if it expresses something else, then it is worth documenting the question is whether it was used while me... commented 2026-09-28 22:24:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189701193 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 481) | At least one of the Premier Inns in town has a hotel bar; this one may eventually end up with one too - need to wait and see. commented 2026-09-28 22:23:31 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,884 |
| 189694921 (Comments: 2) | YGSON (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revertido en changeset/189701009 commented 2026-09-28 22:19:21 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 189694512 (Comments: 1) | YGSON (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revertido en changeset/189701029 commented 2026-09-28 22:18:48 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 187813811 (Comments: 1) | YGSON (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revertido en changeset/189701045 commented 2026-09-28 22:18:17 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 187811733 (Comments: 1) | YGSON (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revertido en changeset/189701056 commented 2026-09-28 22:17:39 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 188252512 (Comments: 1) | ruthcaguano (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola @ruthcaguano. Revisando el nodo 7491459374, veo que corresponde a una intersección de calles, pero en la última edición el punto quedó desplazado de la intersección. ¿Podrías verificar este... commented 2026-09-28 22:09:24 UTC by bymoxb ♦2 |
| 189604867 (Comments: 1) | datainazwa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21363 commented 2026-09-28 21:36:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189341069 (Comments: 7) | OSMphil (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, thanks for taking our tips on board. A quick glance shows no serious hickups left. happy mapping and safe travels commented 2026-09-28 21:29:31 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,361 |
| 189689751 (Comments: 1) | nick1993 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Ciao nick, attento ai suggerimenti automatici perché ti fanno spostare in "branch" cose che branch (nome della filiale, a volte è il nome della città o della via per città con più filiali) non sono,... commented 2026-09-28 21:04:22 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,943 |
| 166227985 (Comments: 3) | copros (Discussed changesets: 5) | An Nielkrokodil und Luzandro: Ihr habt mir offensichtlich auf eine „Bitte um Auskunft“ meinerseits von vor mehr als einem Jahr geantwortet. An den Grund meiner Anfrage kann ich mich nicht mehr erinnern und ich finde hier leider keinen Weg... commented 2026-09-28 20:54:44 UTC by copros ♦4 |
| 189309377 (Comments: 6) | MaciekMma (Discussed changesets: 18) | Dzieki za szczegolowe informacje. bicycle=foot=designated zostalo zapewne z czasow gdy ten highway byl typu path. Poprawilem jak sugerowales. commented 2026-09-28 20:46:53 UTC by MaciekMma ♦75 |
| 189692074 (Comments: 2) | JerzyUrban (Discussed changesets: 19) | Nie wiem, skąd ja wziąłem brownfield. Niemniej czy słuszne było zmienianie starego obszaru dla obu biurowców w obszar budowy? Przy podaniu źródła można by było normalnie ocenić, czy miałeś podstawy wiedzieć ile terenu jest ... commented 2026-09-28 20:33:47 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦449 |
| 185420016 (Comments: 12) | Szántó András 82 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Olvasd el légy szíves, hogy milyen módon kezdted a párbeszédet. Hallod egyáltalán magad? Vagy feltörték a fiókodat és más irkált a nevedben? Nehogy egy felnőtt ... commented 2026-09-28 20:31:52 UTC by Szántó András 82 ♦1 |
| 182097941 (Comments: 2) | ralley (Discussed changesets: 43) | Because there is literally no crossing here but the footpath links to the road. There is no loss of information but a correction. This was confirmed by a visit to the location on 29 July. I use various OSM routers for foot based routing a lot and the... commented 2026-09-28 20:31:51 UTC by ralley ♦653 |
 | 189696498 (Comments: 1) | nev123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Staff=Osoblje, Stuff=Stvari ;) commented 2026-09-28 20:13:17 UTC by Dean Leichtle ♦4 |
| 187475872 (Comments: 15) | 3sonsy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vandaag even langsgefietst, want naar mijn idee klopt dit niet. Er is inderdaad geen verbinding tussen de Oosterkade/Gansstraat en Ledig Erf. Echter staan er nergens fietspadborden vanaf de Catharijnesingel tot de Abstederdijk. Bij de Absterde... commented 2026-09-28 20:12:38 UTC by DwarfNebula_ ♦75 |
| 144218329 (Comments: 3) | GBAB (Discussed changesets: 123) | Köszi, így világos, csak furcsa volt, hogy az útvonala teljes egészében része a Fény a határon-nak is commented 2026-09-28 20:04:46 UTC by petervelosy ♦6 |
| 189684546 (Comments: 1) | CIRCUITOS Y DIVISIONES- SECRETARIA ELECTORAL NACIONAL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buenas tardes! Muchas gracias por el aporte de esa información! Siempre el tema de numeraciones es un dato importante. Le quería comentar que en la calle Los Perales desconecté un nodo de numeración del polígono de ... commented 2026-09-28 19:43:56 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦171 |
| 189644640 (Comments: 4) | Max_Madhava_RD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok. Systematisch nachvollziehbar, bei diesem Anwendungsfall … naja, hilft ja nix. Nehme ich sie halt wieder raus und wir benötigen noch eine Extra-Liste. commented 2026-09-28 19:42:46 UTC by Max_Madhava_RD ♦1 |
| 189688535 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 191) | Ако някой е толкова убеден, че адресът на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206991538 не е точен, може да го промени. Но това съм видял(ground truth). Пред вх. А не пи... commented 2026-09-28 19:33:20 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 189600096 (Comments: 3) | Gigiliusz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ok, w takim razie powinien być tagowany jako highway=path, a nie highway=cycleway. Zachęcam do zerknięcia tutaj i poprawy: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w Warto również podawać... commented 2026-09-28 19:30:40 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,494 |
| 189418665 (Comments: 1) | Náčelník (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561433409. What is the mean of the tags FID_ZBG = 7658026932633600 KATEGCHU_K = PP KATEGCHU_P = přírodní památka KODCHU = 6197 NAZEV = Jindřichova s... commented 2026-09-28 19:20:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,862 |
| 189663575 (Comments: 1) | Janosh_1337 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Janosh, die beiden Gebäude sind etwas groß geraten. Ich empfehle bei Anpassung von Gebäuden auch den Hintergrund "ALKIS" zu Rate zu ziehen und diesen gemeinsam mit dem DOP als Maßgabe für die Gebä... commented 2026-09-28 19:15:15 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,361 |
| 189683756 (Comments: 5) | deposit_nl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thx... I noticed... commented 2026-09-28 19:14:10 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 183687027 (Comments: 2) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 100) | Ik heb hier van alles aangepast, wat bedoel je precies? commented 2026-09-28 19:07:45 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦801 |
| 189688157 (Comments: 4) | jjyach (Discussed changesets: 22) | That section is just an odd doughnut hole of unincorporated Arapahoe County squished between Centennial and Aurora. It has high traffic counts but is neglected by the county and it has far more cars traversing it than the section south of Quincy. S... commented 2026-09-28 19:04:28 UTC by jjyach ♦43 |
| 189514324 (Comments: 2) | FietsendDisco_v (Discussed changesets: 5) | De wijziging van de naam is best slordig gedaan. Delen heten nog steeds Goorloop en andere delen heten nu Boerdonkse Aa. Op de recentste legger van Aa en Maas zie ik geen namen van waterlopen meer staan. Het wordt zo dus lastig om de locatie ... commented 2026-09-28 18:53:35 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,219 |
| 189514563 (Comments: 2) | FietsendDisco_v (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ik heb de oude naam naar de juiste tag (old_name) verplaatst en de naam Goorloop hersteld. commented 2026-09-28 18:49:17 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,219 |
| 189539868 (Comments: 1) | lebergougnoux (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please use ref:FR:FANTOIR instead of ref:REF:FANTOIR. commented 2026-09-28 18:46:10 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,862 |
| 189669396 (Comments: 5) | Paul van der Heijden (Discussed changesets: 20) | Nou dat paaltje staat nu op fixed. Dat zal wel helpen. Maar kennelijk pakt de brandweerapp dan ook het fietspad? Ovwrigens was het daarvoor niet als fietspad getagd. Ik weet niet hoe snel je updates worden doorgevoerd in de app. commented 2026-09-28 18:41:46 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189681244 (Comments: 1) | NLCRC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Is the shop really out on the grass? commented 2026-09-28 18:32:48 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,387 |
| 189548204 (Comments: 3) | profe_sabri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buenísimo! Tenés de muestra las calles que cortan, como Enrique Blanco. Y cualquier cosa podés consultar las etiquetas en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ , o también conectarte con la comunidad de usuarios en el grupo de t... commented 2026-09-28 18:24:41 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦171 |
| 189686625 (Comments: 1) | mgo252 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Que voulez-vous dire exactement par « vitesse par défaut à Linkebeek » ? Selon la loi, la vitesse par défaut en agglomération en Région flamande est de 50 km/h. h... commented 2026-09-28 18:24:07 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,087 |
| 189310411 (Comments: 4) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi Tómas, Since F88 may have deep ford (even it is a beautiful track, like F910 <3), we seem agree that it could be unclassified. Feel free to start a discussion about that. I do not really k... commented 2026-09-28 18:23:49 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦167 |
| 189624930 (Comments: 2) | Sparty0 (Discussed changesets: 175) | czy to z samego lidara dodane? jak tak to skąd wiesz że to ścieżki są? commented 2026-09-28 18:20:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 186275432 (Comments: 2) | DasKartenSchaf (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ah und das selbe für die Linie ohne Eigenschaften - scheint ein duplikat zu sein: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448170207 commented 2026-09-28 18:03:19 UTC by dreua ♦141 |
| 189646565 (Comments: 1) | Ybguclu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Sildiğiniz yol uydu görüntülerinde görünüyor. Bu yolu yanlışlıkla mı sildiniz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96136327 Değişiklik açıklamalarına neleri niye değiştirdiğinizi kısaca ... commented 2026-09-28 17:52:07 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦287 |
| 189646506 (Comments: 1) | cerenpınar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Değişikliğinizi geri aldım. Lütfen deneme amacıyla gerçek dışı değişiklikler yapmayınız. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189691501 commented 2026-09-28 17:46:58 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦287 |
| 188993195 (Comments: 3) | E-vun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Описания пакетов правок можно писать на местном языке. Перерисовывать с Яндекса и 2gis нельзя. Только с табличек, генпланов или официальны... commented 2026-09-28 17:39:18 UTC by _PG_ ♦33 |
| 189590578 (Comments: 1) | Till_btn (Discussed changesets: 11) | Danke, dass du das so schnell eingetragen hast :) Wenn man noch keine Ortskenntnis hat, sind die Stationen in OsmAnd tatsächlich sehr hilfreich. commented 2026-09-28 17:34:07 UTC by dreua ♦141 |
| 189690800 (Comments: 1) | Andreas Binder (Discussed changesets: 98) | Weide wiederhergestellt, da dies zu 3/4 des Jahres die "landuse" ist https://up.picr.de/51343733dc.jpg, und das neue Extra-Skigebiet https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20957831 https://up.picr.de/51343741lg.png bereits im "SkiW... commented 2026-09-28 17:34:04 UTC by Andreas Binder ♦266 |
| 189641004 (Comments: 1) | Afxs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189690674 commented 2026-09-28 17:29:00 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
 | 189301640 (Comments: 2) | ikiliki (Discussed changesets: 3) | Важи, хвала Вам. Мислим да сам негде прочитао да maxspeed мора бити број, док maxspeed:source је индиректна вредност. Поштоваћу ово што сте већ рекл... commented 2026-09-28 17:28:22 UTC by ikiliki ♦3 |
| 189682819 (Comments: 4) | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (Discussed changesets: 59) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth voir ground truth vs official truth commented 2026-09-28 17:25:58 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦550 |
| 189154373 (Comments: 1) | cimvi2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здраво, терцијални пут "Градиштански пут" је оградом одвојен од мотопута. Колико капирам ти си овим комитом та два спојио, али уради... commented 2026-09-28 17:23:44 UTC by ikiliki ♦3 |
| 189386552 (Comments: 7) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 48) | maybe it will have a curve at the end, but not sure if it is going to be in the bridge itself or the road. Let´s wait for that. regards commented 2026-09-28 17:22:23 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 177456498 (Comments: 1) | Ruslan Fatih (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi! I noticed that the trees along Nguyễn Cơ Thạch are mapped as many individual natural=tree nodes. Since they form a continuous row along the road, would it be possible to map them as natural=tree_row instead? This would make the mappin... commented 2026-09-28 17:14:59 UTC by pLoskutov ♦13 |
| 189685460 (Comments: 1) | Panchulo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Hay tags para caminos provados. No se borran. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189685460 commented 2026-09-28 16:52:08 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189582672 (Comments: 2) | hadidoki (Discussed changesets: 3) | János Feltser <feltser58@gmail.com> 18:44 (6 perccel ezelőtt) címzett: OpenStreetMap Szia qstep! A "Benőtt!" jelzésekre gondolsz? Elég régen, és ritkán rajzolok mo... commented 2026-09-28 16:51:36 UTC by hadidoki ♦1 |
| 189554244 (Comments: 3) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 49) | C'est toujours utile pour le prochain commerce/bureau qui s'installera Vous pouvez mettre le tag disused:office commented 2026-09-28 16:38:50 UTC by jbcharron ♦192 |
| 145636315 (Comments: 4) | InfosReseaux (Discussed changesets: 29) | Bonne observation pour le 4Bis en effet, je retrouverai certainement une DUP qui prévoir la réhausse de la ligne. En revanche il faudrait vérifier sur place si les travaux de 2022 n'ont pas entraîné la re... commented 2026-09-28 16:37:05 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦190 |
| 189630002 (Comments: 1) | tms13 (Discussed changesets: 87) | This change made the lake disappear on the map. Please fix. commented 2026-09-28 16:35:33 UTC by Luc Girod ♦1 |
| 189681546 (Comments: 1) | ctv43 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Esta es una cuenta sock-puppet para evitar un bloqueo de https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21010. Se corrige el nombre name:es por el correcto > Tírig. commented 2026-09-28 16:34:40 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,884 |
| 188962563 (Comments: 3) | cstromw (Discussed changesets: 5) | Makes sense. Thank you! commented 2026-09-28 16:30:49 UTC by ion_chi ♦98 |
| 183656100 (Comments: 2) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, Yes, this was a typo and thanks for bringing it to my attention. I have made the fix on behalf of VLD318 in changeset 189687485. Thanks again VLD192 commented 2026-09-28 16:18:50 UTC by VLD192 ♦11 |
| 184280082 (Comments: 2) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi aharvey, thank you for this and for letting me know. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-28 16:14:55 UTC by Ky_AT ♦26 |
| 163032532 (Comments: 1) | Not Just 4 Bikes (Discussed changesets: 8) | I still would tag that as a prison because it is for young offenders. In hungary we have them too for example this building for youth female offenders: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836137327 So I'll tag it as a prison. And actually t... commented 2026-09-28 16:10:04 UTC by ottwiz ♦400 |
| 189686499 (Comments: 1) | Greg Boye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Greg Boye, welcome to OSM and thanks for the correction. Do you know where Fettehman Senior High School is located? That needs to be mapped as well. commented 2026-09-28 16:09:48 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦190 |
| 179776498 (Comments: 2) | uprkos (Discussed changesets: 54) | Nie mam nic przeciwko, spokojnie zmieniaj. Ja tam coś poprawiałem, ale pamiętam, że miałem dużo wątpliwości.... commented 2026-09-28 16:06:08 UTC by uprkos ♦119 |
| 184172190 (Comments: 1) | wertol (Discussed changesets: 6) | Mit tudunk még róla? Mert rajta hagytad hogy elhagyatott és benőtt. commented 2026-09-28 15:26:36 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189645931 (Comments: 1) | resident-2022 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo resident-2022, für die "lokale Bezeichnung" am besten loc_name= https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name) verwenden. name:de= ist für mehrsprachige Namen, das trifft hier vermutlich nicht zu ;) h... commented 2026-09-28 15:21:28 UTC by JochenOSM ♦147 |
| 189609215 (Comments: 2) | ArneKon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, danke für den Hinweis! Ich habe die Positionen und Infos der Bushaltestellen aktualisiert. Hab dabei scheinbar vergessen relation/2797384 (Stadtbus Bad Orb A2) umzuleiten. Sollte jetzt verbessert sein. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-28 15:18:01 UTC by ArneKon ♦1 |
| 189581058 (Comments: 7) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, I finally got to replying. Thank you for clarifying that saddles that are part of the road are of course logically a mountain_pass=yes, I try to review changes I am not really familiar with too, so excuse the confusion. Regarding th... commented 2026-09-28 15:11:08 UTC by KartKollektor ♦45 |
| 189459888 (Comments: 2) | Morgoate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je les ai remises à la main, normalement tout est bon commented 2026-09-28 15:09:12 UTC by Morgoate ♦1 |
| 189610743 (Comments: 1) | diamondarmorsteve (Discussed changesets: 52) | what the hell is this? this is not correct and so ugly commented 2026-09-28 15:03:07 UTC by dmjab13 ♦151 |
| 189653202 (Comments: 1) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 39) | please try to keep your edits to a single continent commented 2026-09-28 15:01:31 UTC by dmjab13 ♦151 |
| 189504827 (Comments: 2) | Hervé Bourne (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour Aurelien, @Aurelien Albert J'ai supprimé la portion créée à tord, encore marquée ouverte (way/683685017). Par contre je n'arrive toujours pas à supprimer la portion way/110935773<... commented 2026-09-28 14:59:47 UTC by Hervé Bourne ♦2 |
| 189683505 (Comments: 1) | yagmurkayaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Değişikliğinizi geri aldım. Lütfen deneme amaçlı değişiklik yapmayınız. Veya hayali öğeler eklemeyiniz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189683857 commented 2026-09-28 14:54:01 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦287 |
| 189670908 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 653) | test commented 2026-09-28 14:53:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189682328 (Comments: 2) | FormelessPuppy41 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hoi, Ik heb er highway service van gemaakt met C1 accesstagging en een bollard removable. Groet, eggie commented 2026-09-28 14:44:42 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189668844 (Comments: 2) | Will Tubby (Discussed changesets: 1) | RM is not my source, my primary source is local knowledge. I mentioned RM as evidence. commented 2026-09-28 14:40:32 UTC by Will Tubby ♦1 |
| 189529454 (Comments: 5) | vellare (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ну ты тогда такую претензию выпиши всем людям в мире. А то без тебя не разберутся commented 2026-09-28 14:26:02 UTC by vellare ♦2 |
| 189653428 (Comments: 1) | Fobos-Bloxy (Discussed changesets: 20) | Estimado. 2 temas. 1) No usar fuentes que no podemos usar, como google. 2) La calidad del mapeo. Una cosa es cometer errores, pero se nota que no se está tomando esto con seriedad. Estos mapes serán reportados y reversados complet... commented 2026-09-28 14:23:40 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189658327 (Comments: 1) | allwe231 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Apakah nama resminya "Jalan Akses Gunung Padang\t "? commented 2026-09-28 14:22:32 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189658495 (Comments: 1) | allwe231 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Saya rasa ini tidak cocok untuk diubah ke jalan sekunder commented 2026-09-28 14:21:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189680479 (Comments: 1) | SunflowerMadness (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nguawor rek commented 2026-09-28 14:10:56 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189664729 (Comments: 1) | KapitanEggy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kalau cabang, tambahkan ke kolom Cabang/Branch commented 2026-09-28 14:09:12 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 188086993 (Comments: 1) | Facts Matter (Discussed changesets: 1) | User "Facts Matter" is deleting verified surveillance nodes without evidence. commented 2026-09-28 14:08:28 UTC by Bote Man ♦1 |
| 189645662 (Comments: 1) | b_chancel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Should spell out street names. Computers are great at creating abbreviations when desirable but bad about being able to come up with intelligent expansions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2026-09-28 14:06:11 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 189610360 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Cusack (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, are you able check the address of the one tagged as 33a Gregory Ave as It looks likely it could be 32a Woodview Road instead looking at block layouts. commented 2026-09-28 14:04:29 UTC by nevw ♦2,351 |
| 189663024 (Comments: 1) | The Winslow - Oklahoma City (Discussed changesets: 2) | Branch information goes in the branch tag only, not the name tag. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189663024 commented 2026-09-28 14:02:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 189663143 (Comments: 1) | The Winslow - Oklahoma City (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please use descriptive changeset comments. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189663143 commented 2026-09-28 14:02:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 189552062 (Comments: 2) | LauV85 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Oui, je veux bien, tant que j'apparais à la bonne adresse (cf ci-dessous) avec les disciplines proposées dans le cabinet que j'ai à mon domicile, ça me va, merci, Bonne journée, Cordialem... commented 2026-09-28 14:02:15 UTC by LauV85 ♦1 |
| 178536174 (Comments: 3) | whb (Discussed changesets: 40) | Dankeschön! commented 2026-09-28 13:45:25 UTC by BjörnSc ♦10 |
| 189624394 (Comments: 2) | ÚtKár (Discussed changesets: 2) | a wikipédiát azért linkeltem oda mert a cikkben lejebb görgetve részletes leírás van a romokról. megpróbálom szerkeszteni a wikipédián külön cikknek, é... commented 2026-09-28 13:41:30 UTC by ÚtKár ♦1 |
| 189408439 (Comments: 2) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 8) | I honestly may continue mapping here commented 2026-09-28 13:32:55 UTC by xanderthemapper31 ♦8 |
| 189675012 (Comments: 4) | Zwier Fikse (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem.. Veel plezier met mappen! commented 2026-09-28 13:32:39 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189648596 (Comments: 4) | Zwier Fikse (Discussed changesets: 2) | Heb er inmiddels, als het goed is, eentje weggehaald. Gr! commented 2026-09-28 13:31:31 UTC by Zwier Fikse ♦2 |
| 150532004 (Comments: 3) | TFI71 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Beklager, jeg må have slået Punkter fra i editoren. commented 2026-09-28 13:22:04 UTC by cyclist789 ♦135 |
| 189350847 (Comments: 1) | Hase (Discussed changesets: 4) | Moin Hase, bitte den name-Tag nur für echte Eigennamen verwenden. Dein Text ist eine Beschreibung. Ich passe das an. Gruß Roger Wilco commented 2026-09-28 13:12:04 UTC by OSM_RogerWilco ♦839 |
| 188945659 (Comments: 1) | CartographerAdmiral (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi CartographerAdmiral I notice you keep changing sidings railway tracks into main tracks on your own judgement, disregarding the standard practice applied by the community in Turkey. How can I explain the usage of a railway track is based on sign... commented 2026-09-28 13:10:36 UTC by de24000 ♦13 |
| 186774236 (Comments: 2) | MagmaMusen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Untitled bliver det egentlige navn når kunsteren ikke ønsker at give et navn. Det bruges stadig til at identificere værker, så det er meget anderledes end ikke at tagge med et navn. :) commented 2026-09-28 13:09:19 UTC by MagmaMusen ♦1 |
| 189672470 (Comments: 2) | Jour Nuit (Discussed changesets: 2) | "opening_hours"="Mo-Sun" n'est pas assez précis : uniquement pendant la journée, heure par heure, ou 24 h/24, 7 j/7 commented 2026-09-28 12:53:38 UTC by Jakka ♦1,880 |
| 189672782 (Comments: 1) | Jour Nuit (Discussed changesets: 2) | building:levels 5 ? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1036918635503823 commented 2026-09-28 12:47:23 UTC by Jakka ♦1,880 |
| 189670552 (Comments: 1) | Toffer12 (Discussed changesets: 6) | The gates are already tagged. Adding the gates to the track means it's blocking the trains. commented 2026-09-28 12:42:59 UTC by DaveF ♦1,689 |
| 187264616 (Comments: 6) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 2) | The video traffic detection are usually between protected left and middle. These things are usually behind the right traffic light. commented 2026-09-28 12:29:14 UTC by Blahblah_blah ♦1 |
| 189399557 (Comments: 11) | aldoct (Discussed changesets: 32) | Sisi, la cosa delle i è errata anche per me, ma va bene con I in questi casi. commented 2026-09-28 12:26:25 UTC by giopera ♦34 |
| 188446372 (Comments: 2) | cxs (Discussed changesets: 29) | Es handelt sich um Top 1 von insgesamt 12 Gewerbeeinheiten. Als einzige von außen klar gekennzeichnet ist sie momentan Sitz der DesignWerstatt. commented 2026-09-28 12:19:00 UTC by cxs ♦7 |
| 147742421 (Comments: 1) | pkn (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi, I randomly stumbled across https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253324909 - It currently only has nudism=yes and is not tagged as a building or other feature. It looks like a building outline to me, so I was wondering whether nudism=yes was intenti... commented 2026-09-28 12:18:26 UTC by ChaudGuy ♦2 |
| 189661368 (Comments: 2) | JoanL (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! Oki, Thank you for the feedback, will revert my changes. Best, commented 2026-09-28 12:15:41 UTC by JoanL ♦2 |
| 189511005 (Comments: 3) | albi1a (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hei, Danke... mein Kommentar war nur als Hinweis gg. für andere Orte für die nördlichen Teile von LDS/ TF gedacht, daran mal zu denken. Sven commented 2026-09-28 12:14:46 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,194 |
| 160003716 (Comments: 1) | MicDK (Discussed changesets: 75) | Du er i gang med noget af et projekt i Vornæs Skov. Jeg har ikke tænkt mig at blande mig i det, men jeg ville lige foreslå nogle alternative måder at gøre tingene på, i fald du ikke kendte dem: - I stedet f... commented 2026-09-28 12:13:49 UTC by cyclist789 ♦135 |
| 189651803 (Comments: 1) | Patrickgh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Patrickgh, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping. When mapping buildings in iD editor remember to right click and select "Square". The footprint should represent a single building as much as possible. I also reco... commented 2026-09-28 12:13:37 UTC by Enock4seth ♦685 |
| 189587860 (Comments: 3) | burningmatt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi Klein foutje. Je was vergeten de dagen te vertalen voor Za-Zo > Sa-Su. Ik heb ook de website toegevoegd. commented 2026-09-28 12:13:32 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 189649147 (Comments: 1) | joneston (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi joneston, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping. When mapping buildings in iD editor remember to right click and select "Square". I also recommend using "Esri World Imagery" as background imagery from ... commented 2026-09-28 12:12:07 UTC by Enock4seth ♦685 |
| 189675857 (Comments: 1) | cyclist789 (Discussed changesets: 24) | TEST _italics_ *italics* **bold** ***bold italics*** **bold landuse=forest** commented 2026-09-28 12:10:12 UTC by cyclist789 ♦135 |
| 189352001 (Comments: 2) | myself1232 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've been near this place and I didn't see any sign that allows me to prove that the car rental office is really placed there commented 2026-09-28 12:09:54 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189636413 (Comments: 1) | AEZw (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dagen in opening_hours worden genoteerd als tweeletterige, Engelstalige afkorting. Zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours commented 2026-09-28 12:09:53 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 188384750 (Comments: 1) | rockstar8848 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello; Thanks for mapping. A remark. Buildings you map in this project are to be tagged as building=yes. (default) best regards commented 2026-09-28 12:08:00 UTC by Frans S ♦11,033 |
| 189674859 (Comments: 1) | santon (Discussed changesets: 50) | Wow, was man doch so alles an Information zurück lässt https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1424912/history/10 commented 2026-09-28 12:07:45 UTC by ToniE ♦1,288 |
| 189651844 (Comments: 2) | howardlai (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't add stuff only by your own personal iption or situations --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189651844 commented 2026-09-28 11:57:14 UTC by Supaplex ♦11,376 |
| 189545999 (Comments: 6) | PacifyUwU (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you, looks good now. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-28 11:47:24 UTC by Joel Koen ♦93 |
| 165492516 (Comments: 2) | Milhouse (Discussed changesets: 13) | Thanks - yes there are more and more complex driving restrictions (which I understand and support) but where it would really help that routers are aware of them. On the assumption that these days most people will be following a satnav, something that... commented 2026-09-28 11:44:28 UTC by Milhouse ♦30 |
| 189668476 (Comments: 11) | Mart van Iersel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dank voor je uitleg en de verwijzing naar de wiki. Ik begrijp nu dat vanuit het perspectief van OpenStreetMap de volledigheid van de kaart zwaarder weegt dan de wens van een eigenaar om een privéweg niet zichtbaar te hebben. Ik begrijp ook dat... commented 2026-09-28 11:43:58 UTC by Mart van Iersel ♦1 |
| 189630333 (Comments: 1) | Lovimoo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, peux tu éviter de casser des relations en supprimant des chemins utilisées par celles-ci ? J'ai corrigé la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2721330#map=13/49.47829/0.14253 Cordialemen... commented 2026-09-28 11:42:02 UTC by Yunan973 ♦171 |
| 189672783 (Comments: 1) | Alphen_Geo-info_MR (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Alphen De wegklasse heb ik aangepast naar unclassified. Dit zullen geen woningen zijn. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-28 11:37:23 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189621340 (Comments: 3) | Optimistje2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Optimistje2 Ben je er zeker van dat dit nummer (+31 299 652 405) correct is? Zoeken op internet (zoekterm: Kleur Adviseurs) geeft niet dit nummer terug maar vindt wel +31 6 4607 2056 en +31 20 810 2187 commented 2026-09-28 11:27:18 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 189538715 (Comments: 4) | Mafeu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sehr gut, das fehlt noch. Von den Fahrspuren hatte ich keine Fotos, das was da im Moment an lanes an die Straße getaggt ist, ist höchstens eine Altlast von vor der Umgestaltung und wahrscheinlich auch falsch. Hinter dem Kreisel geht die ba... commented 2026-09-28 11:24:22 UTC by Mafeu ♦1 |
| 189607786 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi Silversurfer, Hermes habe ich hoffentlich richtig eingetragen. Meintest du mit rechteckigem Gebäude den Rewe Markt? Der wäre nach Grundriss nicht vollständig rechteckig. Bei Anpassung mit Taste "Q" kommt es bei neben... commented 2026-09-28 11:15:03 UTC by matze089 ♦46 |
| 14169220 (Comments: 2) | tms13 (Discussed changesets: 87) | Hi, In addition to the above comment, could you please check this thread on the forums? https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-relation-2621481-be-deleted/148162 Cofion, Ceirios commented 2026-09-28 11:10:59 UTC by ceirios ♦150 |
| 189084965 (Comments: 7) | P Diddy (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've strongly suspected as well, but the evidence was just circumstantial enough that I haven't been able to prove a formal DWG case. However, at the very least there is strong evidence they are a sock of the perma-blocked @TheAutoAidEditor... commented 2026-09-28 11:08:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦307 |
| 189662734 (Comments: 3) | RAVU-Voogsgerd (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, ja ik verwijderde de hospital verwijzing, maar daar had inderdaad een yes gemoeten geen key. commented 2026-09-28 11:04:33 UTC by RAVU-Voogsgerd ♦1 |
| 189652211 (Comments: 3) | teejot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, thanks for clarifying! Cheers! commented 2026-09-28 11:00:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189363275 (Comments: 3) | Wikiscout (Discussed changesets: 25) | Ja natürlich, roof ist übersetzt "Dach". Und StreetComplete zeigt das bei dem Quest auch ganz gut an, finde ich. Man gibt links die Stockwerke ohne Dach an, rechts die Stockwerke vom Dach, was meistens 1 ist, manchmal 2 und beim F... commented 2026-09-28 11:00:08 UTC by Negreheb ♦419 |
| 189649624 (Comments: 1) | Kriztyleee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189672558 commented 2026-09-28 10:55:34 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 181353741 (Comments: 2) | Wikiscout (Discussed changesets: 25) | Ich weiß gerade nicht exakt, welches Gebäude gemeint ist. Kann gut sein, dass ich ein falsches Gebäude ausgewählt habe. In dem Fall bitte ändern commented 2026-09-28 10:54:16 UTC by Wikiscout ♦8 |
| 173123613 (Comments: 1) | Rendra Regen Rais (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ini bukan Batas Desa Talang Giring? commented 2026-09-28 10:51:47 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189671393 (Comments: 1) | XeNoN6211 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. feedback: Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. Ook de aard toevoegen. emergency= lifeguard Het beste kun je di... commented 2026-09-28 10:47:53 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 185046227 (Comments: 5) | NTKillerton (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have just added a new area to reflect the new woodland and adjusted the old area to cover the area that will still be grazed. commented 2026-09-28 10:46:06 UTC by NTKillerton ♦1 |
| 189637956 (Comments: 1) | Rodolfo L Mora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189672036 commented 2026-09-28 10:44:35 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189189397 (Comments: 1) | Trần Xuân (Discussed changesets: 6) | this boundary is not closed anymore https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1904231, could you fix it? commented 2026-09-28 10:41:48 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189671136 (Comments: 1) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 23) | Прошу прощения, не знал что существует тег Снесено, спасибо за помощь commented 2026-09-28 10:31:24 UTC by duxles ♦1 |
| 189095624 (Comments: 1) | GrabID_UmiZumroh (Discussed changesets: 10) | kenapa dihapus? commented 2026-09-28 10:27:45 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189615097 (Comments: 1) | duxles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189671136 commented 2026-09-28 10:26:54 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189653394 (Comments: 1) | Dudamonas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189670997 commented 2026-09-28 10:24:04 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
 | 189631852 (Comments: 1) | yasen ht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189670977 commented 2026-09-28 10:23:39 UTC by MappingMore ♦751 |
| 184573640 (Comments: 1) | SpecializedRider (Discussed changesets: 19) | Nice work mapping this Specialized! commented 2026-09-28 10:21:15 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦520 |
| 189441429 (Comments: 1) | Alexandre148025 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2026-09-28 10:14:52 UTC by StC ♦535 |
| 189505890 (Comments: 3) | ilos14 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Excellent, thanks for confirming and thanks for your attention to detail :) commented 2026-09-28 10:03:49 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,126 |
| 189533441 (Comments: 3) | AndreePham (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nếu vậy thì mong bạn đừng dùng nguồn dữ liệu cũ để xoá cập nhật mới hơn của người khác nhé. commented 2026-09-28 10:02:46 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦59 |
| 189298800 (Comments: 2) | Glenn Stewart (Discussed changesets: 13) | I just noticed that a basketball court area already existed here. In this case, there was no need to add that node in the first place. commented 2026-09-28 09:53:30 UTC by Solaris07 ♦38 |
| 189653759 (Comments: 1) | Mai Daly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189669183 commented 2026-09-28 09:47:40 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189386812 (Comments: 1) | Ro-vrzhz (Discussed changesets: 19) | Dag Ro,, De uitzonderingen voor tweewielers heb ik verwijderd. Die zijn nu overbodig. Geef svp conscreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. Bv oneway=yes verwijderd. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-28 09:46:10 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189620356 (Comments: 1) | Olifc (Discussed changesets: 34) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189669126 commented 2026-09-28 09:45:54 UTC by MappingMore ♦751 |
| 189652042 (Comments: 1) | Thainy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189668923 commented 2026-09-28 09:42:16 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189628303 (Comments: 5) | Lnvdw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Linda, Ik denk dat één vermelding genoeg is ook al zit het in meer gebouwen. Wanneer je iets toevoegt in de toekomst svp op de bestaande adresnode bijtaggen. Die app voor mobiel zijn overigens enorm beperkt. Ik zal ... commented 2026-09-28 09:35:59 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 11849509 (Comments: 1) | sladen (Discussed changesets: 37) | I realise that this changeset was a very long time ago, but would you have any objection to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2223191 being deleted? It's gradually evolved into a loose collection of 231 features which don't really need... commented 2026-09-28 09:33:21 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,940 |
| 189247666 (Comments: 4) | Chraach (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke für die Rückmeldung, wiederhergestellt und angepasst mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189668317. Ich habe die Inschrift auf "Parentibus" geändert (vorher "Parent bus"). Das ergibt dann mehr Sinn. :-... commented 2026-09-28 09:31:30 UTC by aixbrick ♦941 |
| 188122028 (Comments: 1) | egmichau (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553061587/history - maybe these should be highway=footway commented 2026-09-28 09:28:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 174761151 (Comments: 2) | Mond00 (Discussed changesets: 86) | Danke für den Hinweis, für den Fehler bei Osmose und lasse die Korrektur erstmal sein. commented 2026-09-28 09:27:16 UTC by Mond00 ♦84 |
| 189488117 (Comments: 2) | kaartenliefhebber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Slagboom&Peeters kan uiteraard wel worden gebruikt. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-28 09:22:41 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189643240 (Comments: 1) | JOHNNY951951951 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189667818 commented 2026-09-28 09:20:47 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189606428 (Comments: 4) | Elenita22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Alles gut :) Ich habe übereifrig mehrere Einträge gemacht. Das Gebäude sitzt an der Ecke und der Zahnarzt hat Schilder in beiden Straßen. Es gibt jedoch ein Hinweisschild, dass der Eingang in der Rutschbahn ist. commented 2026-09-28 09:20:30 UTC by Elenita22 ♦1 |
| 189666147 (Comments: 1) | Siddh888 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, vänligen dubblera inte busshållplatser, dvs kolla först om busshållplatsen/er redan finns innan du för in nya dubletter, tack. commented 2026-09-28 09:09:13 UTC by archie ♦1,375 |
| 71875040 (Comments: 3) | klnkengi (Discussed changesets: 39) | No worries whatsoever, it happens, currently debating removing this relation entirely. See this community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-relation-2621481-be-deleted/148162 Will reference this discussion in that post s... commented 2026-09-28 09:02:22 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189665924 (Comments: 2) | Lucas Chambille (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Welkom bij OSM Dit is niet helemaal goed gegaan. Ik heb je wijzigingen teruggedraaid wegens schade aan de kaart. V... commented 2026-09-28 09:01:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 188395451 (Comments: 1) | Kvawesome (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-09-28 09:00:09 UTC by Frans S ♦11,033 |
 | 189591247 (Comments: 1) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 29) | Source? commented 2026-09-28 08:56:14 UTC by imiraldz ♦7 |
| 189633905 (Comments: 1) | Golriz Negar Peak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189666468 commented 2026-09-28 08:51:52 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189598159 (Comments: 1) | enealocatelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I don't think a meeting point for tours should be mapped in OpenStreetMap. If this tour company has an office, this node would be better suited in that location. Thanks commented 2026-09-28 08:51:31 UTC by marcmarti ♦110 |
| 189666449 (Comments: 2) | Alex_mappt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Der Grundstücksbesitzer wird den Weg mittelfristig komplett sperren. commented 2026-09-28 08:51:17 UTC by Alex_mappt ♦2 |
| X | 189666043 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 131) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189652870, 189652890, 189652919, 189653068, 189653095, 189653182, 189653231, 189653240, 189654080, 189654280, 189654297, 189654368, 189654744, 189654752, 189654827, 189655344, 189655372, 189... commented 2026-09-28 08:41:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189653095 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189653182 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654280 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189655344 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189655372 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189653231 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189652919 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189653068 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189652870 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654744 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654080 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654297 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189652890 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189653240 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189655530 (Comments: 3) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654827 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654368 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189654752 (Comments: 2) | Mitya1234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189666043 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-28 08:41:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189666038 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 131) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189652870, 189652890, 189652919, 189653068, 189653095, 189653182, 189653231, 189653240, 189654080, 189654280, 189654297, 189654368, 189654744, 189654752, 189654827, 189655344, 189655372, 189... commented 2026-09-28 08:41:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189149860 (Comments: 4) | miksuko (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hmm, asiasta lienee järkevää käydä laajemminkin keskustelua, koska loppupeleissä yllättävän harva paikka sitten on loppupeleissä maastoon nimetty, joka tarkoittaisi melkoista määrää... commented 2026-09-28 08:37:35 UTC by EduKehakettu ♦11 |
| 163123709 (Comments: 2) | dromedar61 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Danke für deinen Hinweis. Ich habs etwas präzisiert und die Hinweise als erledigt markiert. commented 2026-09-28 08:29:54 UTC by dromedar61 ♦28 |
| 187224204 (Comments: 6) | ALJuhlin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Har nu fixat detta, ligger under ändringsnummer 189386984 commented 2026-09-28 08:27:02 UTC by ALJuhlin ♦1 |
| 189665106 (Comments: 1) | Tat2holics (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-28 08:26:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189664687 (Comments: 1) | HenriC360 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De naam heb ik even omgezet naar description= Wanneer je name= wilt gebruiken dan eenduidig taggen. nam... commented 2026-09-28 08:20:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189007692 (Comments: 4) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 524) | Hi habi, Thanks for following up, you're right. Node 9352303517 was placed at the building entrance. During his survey, Manuel34 mapped the bank at its own entrance (node/13904135583) and left only `disused:amenity=bank` on this node. We ... commented 2026-09-28 08:12:29 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦344 |
| 189559163 (Comments: 2) | Pavel Chepelev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день! Спасибо за комментарий, добавил лишний тег дороге, исправил commented 2026-09-28 08:04:01 UTC by Pavel Chepelev ♦1 |
| 172960962 (Comments: 2) | map per (Discussed changesets: 99) | Ich würde den Text zur Oiden Wiesn eher löschen oder umschreiben, weil das ein Werbetext und keine description=* ist commented 2026-09-28 07:47:09 UTC by map per ♦1,347 |
| 189632795 (Comments: 1) | Bikash_N (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189663721 commented 2026-09-28 07:41:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189634511 (Comments: 1) | Bikash_N (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189663685 commented 2026-09-28 07:40:45 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189632822 (Comments: 1) | mclibra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189663481 commented 2026-09-28 07:35:39 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189589160 (Comments: 2) | toboz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Szia! Köszi, hogy kiszúrtad. Egyszerű tévesztés volt, megnéztem, az északabbra lévő valójában 94. Javítottam. commented 2026-09-28 07:29:04 UTC by toboz ♦4 |
| 189090921 (Comments: 3) | Dror L (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fixed in 18909092 commented 2026-09-28 07:28:25 UTC by Sanniu ♦694 |
| 189150058 (Comments: 2) | miksuko (Discussed changesets: 6) | En käytä Espoon osoitekarttaa datan tuomiseen, kuten tästä changesetistä käynee ilmi :^) Käytän sitä yhtenä resurssina, joka selittää, miksi joitain elementtejä on kartoitettu kartalle.... commented 2026-09-28 07:27:29 UTC by miksuko ♦8 |
| 167523063 (Comments: 2) | HronLukas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure there is a toilet at this place in Mainz? Please respond, honest mistakes are totally fine and can be fixed, vandalism will not be tolerated. commented 2026-09-28 07:17:20 UTC by dreua ♦141 |
| 189057486 (Comments: 1) | AlmostSurelyRob (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks! Site visit 24 Sept. Signage very clear that it's not a shop (any more). In red: 'Trade only. Not open to the public'. Tagging is spot on, cheers. commented 2026-09-28 06:50:33 UTC by no details provided here ♦71 |
| 189644290 (Comments: 1) | Premiumtiflis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Regarding the comment on this and your other changesets, I consider that the changes to the map don't reflect the changes in reality. Reverted. Let me know if I'm wrong https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189661915 commented 2026-09-28 06:50:12 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189644402 (Comments: 1) | Premiumtiflis (Discussed changesets: 2) | Regarding the comment on the changeset, I consider that your changes to the map don't reflect the changes in reality. Reverted. Let me know if I'm wrong commented 2026-09-28 06:48:01 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 118281078 (Comments: 3) | KVI0n (Discussed changesets: 60) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189661686 commented 2026-09-28 06:45:01 UTC by KVI0n ♦58 |
| 189635394 (Comments: 1) | Muhammad Rifqi Attaqi (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've reverted this changeset since the issue was already fixed by changeset/184280082. commented 2026-09-28 06:42:24 UTC by aharvey ♦1,996 |
| 189482980 (Comments: 2) | krzysiuup (Discussed changesets: 9) | Cześć, musiały mi się przypadkiem tam tagi skopiować z sąsiednich odcinków. Oczywiście jest to chodnik. Dzięki za sprawdzenie commented 2026-09-28 06:33:43 UTC by krzysiuup ♦8 |
| 189624538 (Comments: 2) | derredu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Zrop, du hast Recht, hab mich wohl verklickt. Ist korrigiert, danke fürs drüberschauen! VG derredu commented 2026-09-28 06:31:09 UTC by derredu ♦75 |
| 188611165 (Comments: 1) | mr-worldwide (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I was at the Schäferhütte on Saturday. The hut was rebuild (wood looks like it hasn't seen a winter yet), but it's locked now, so seemingly not a tourism=basic_hut any more. commented 2026-09-28 06:29:30 UTC by map per ♦1,347 |
| 189531600 (Comments: 2) | matder (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour désolé pour mes erreurs je ne suis pas très à l'aise avec les marais/vasière, j'ai bien compris et merci de me corriger, pour info je mets à jour les chemins avec mes traces GPS réell... commented 2026-09-28 06:28:31 UTC by matder ♦2 |
| 186170272 (Comments: 2) | 10-NHN-DKraijer (Discussed changesets: 16) | Goedemorgen, fijn dat je meedenkt en kijkt ;-) We zijn hier al een paar jaar mee bezig en hebben soms wel eens wat vragen. Helaas is het tot nu toe niet gelukt om één van de community leden op de koffie te krijgen om de vragen die wij h... commented 2026-09-28 06:16:32 UTC by 10-NHN-DKraijer ♦6 |
| 188388191 (Comments: 2) | XD346 (Discussed changesets: 11) | I refered to information on this page: https://www.landsd.gov.hk/tc/about-us/boundary-plan.html commented 2026-09-28 06:11:11 UTC by XD346 ♦35 |
| 186930999 (Comments: 1) | MosheMadlan (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, there is no צוקי ארסוף street nearby, can you mark one? commented 2026-09-28 06:10:15 UTC by Sanniu ♦694 |
| 189660452 (Comments: 1) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 39) | Of course, I actually changed it to "description". commented 2026-09-28 06:05:17 UTC by Biff ♦29 |
| 189567373 (Comments: 1) | Fuse84 (Discussed changesets: 1) | شكراً لك <3 هل يمكنك اضافته الى المدن والمحافظات والتقسيمات الادارية كذلك لطفاً؟ شكراً مجدداً. commented 2026-09-28 06:02:24 UTC by 𒂼𒄄 ♦66 |
 | 189646985 (Comments: 1) | zalabhf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189660079 commented 2026-09-28 05:49:53 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
 | 189644227 (Comments: 1) | aliinsaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189659448 commented 2026-09-28 05:19:44 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189466651 (Comments: 1) | Glendora (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189620688 commented 2026-09-28 05:05:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189428202 (Comments: 1) | Mredss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189620527 commented 2026-09-28 05:04:51 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189468134 (Comments: 1) | Trail9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189620377 commented 2026-09-28 05:04:20 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189425184 (Comments: 1) | Helio_works (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189620298 commented 2026-09-28 05:03:51 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189463669 (Comments: 2) | Claudio Adão Silva (Discussed changesets: 22) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189620136 commented 2026-09-28 05:03:03 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189442042 (Comments: 1) | geoapur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189620056 commented 2026-09-28 05:02:29 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189432451 (Comments: 1) | Nikola Djunev 2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189619748 commented 2026-09-28 05:01:55 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189488008 (Comments: 1) | Ricardo Lausín (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189622648 commented 2026-09-28 04:52:40 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189505520 (Comments: 1) | osmforlife (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189614530 commented 2026-09-28 04:51:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189503522 (Comments: 1) | Dulcidev (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189614170 commented 2026-09-28 04:51:23 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189476632 (Comments: 1) | pearl ghosh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189613685 commented 2026-09-28 04:50:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189496787 (Comments: 1) | kintuEmanuel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189612874 commented 2026-09-28 04:50:06 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
 | 189516365 (Comments: 1) | Antonio Rojas 757575 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189553623 commented 2026-09-28 04:49:19 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189480856 (Comments: 1) | DeniseChan23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189552996 commented 2026-09-28 04:48:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189474139 (Comments: 1) | damian25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189550820 commented 2026-09-28 04:48:13 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189477046 (Comments: 1) | pearl ghosh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189550385 commented 2026-09-28 04:47:39 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189505692 (Comments: 1) | JeeESS79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189549527 commented 2026-09-28 04:47:01 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189485832 (Comments: 1) | Ooogway24 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189549383 commented 2026-09-28 04:46:29 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189478949 (Comments: 1) | a123987 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189548450 commented 2026-09-28 04:45:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189638620 (Comments: 2) | donthatedontkill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah pardon! commented 2026-09-28 04:40:50 UTC by donthatedontkill ♦1 |
| 188664303 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 109) | Moikka, kyselisin, että mikä näissä muutoksissa oli sinulla lähteenä? Muutoskokoelmassa ei source-merkintää ole. Oletko käynyt maastossa fixme=resurvey pyynnön mukaisesti kartoittamasaa puron/noron ti... commented 2026-09-28 04:18:53 UTC by kartoittaa ♦17 |
| 189630699 (Comments: 1) | Aryo verdiantoro (Discussed changesets: 1) | mohon jangan lupa berikan judul perubahan yang sesuai commented 2026-09-28 03:00:16 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189653092 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 90) | Legal o esforço, mas esse trecho está em obras de duplicação. Em breve vai ter que ser mudado tudo de novo. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189653092<... commented 2026-09-28 02:59:20 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦30 |
| 189654754 (Comments: 1) | nifqi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Apa benar? ( ≖ ͜ʖ ≖ ) commented 2026-09-28 02:58:12 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189636750 (Comments: 1) | nrstd (Discussed changesets: 1) | apakah ini tempat publik/umum? Dalam bidang apa? commented 2026-09-28 02:49:30 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189610213 (Comments: 1) | Ardykusdiharto (Discussed changesets: 6) | Saran: nama "Jl." jangan disingkat, gunakan "Jalan" commented 2026-09-28 02:30:01 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 180926750 (Comments: 2) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 156) | Iya nih, beberapa waktu lalu ada yg ubah kembali nama jalan yg juga berawal "Jl–". Nanti saya coba ulas kembali dengan overpass. commented 2026-09-28 02:00:43 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189655137 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 90) | Agora a velocidade das vias, sim, está correto! commented 2026-09-28 01:26:58 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦96 |
| 189653710 (Comments: 1) | Pargetts (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, You put the information on the outer way of a relation. If you want to edit the details you should do it on that r14485318 instead. I have moved the phone number across. Thanks. commented 2026-09-28 01:14:37 UTC by TheSwavu ♦685 |
| 189624185 (Comments: 1) | IrvingNgr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of Googl... commented 2026-09-28 01:05:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 188949611 (Comments: 4) | lockshi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, thanks! Appreciate the update and taking care of it (though I would have been happy to help too). Cheers! commented 2026-09-28 01:00:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189521389 (Comments: 2) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 90) | Já parei de editar meu amigo! commented 2026-09-27 23:40:46 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦96 |
| 189625259 (Comments: 2) | kartoittaa (Discussed changesets: 10) | No jep! Fiksattu, kiitos. Osunut sormi väärään viivaan pensasaidan suhteen, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1562734880 commented 2026-09-27 23:25:27 UTC by kartoittaa ♦17 |
| 189548721 (Comments: 1) | Mack_john (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14214431209/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14214431211/ Would you happen to know if the roads join up here, even with a path? commented 2026-09-27 23:15:46 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,269 |
| 120576429 (Comments: 3) | JohnGoodBreed (Discussed changesets: 7) | Nein, ist es nicht. Ringingen und die gesamte Region um Hechingen waren hohenzollerisch und haben nie zu Württemberg gehört. Zudem würde ich das geographische Zentrum Württembergs viel weiter im Nordosten verorten. commented 2026-09-27 22:59:00 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦114 |
| 119368726 (Comments: 1) | carlwev (Discussed changesets: 18) | Please do not tag for the renderer by adding a `natural=beach` in the middle of a park in London. I appreciate a pretty carto render as much as the next person but not at the expense of adding junk data into OSM. commented 2026-09-27 22:48:20 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189648770 (Comments: 2) | Ghastly Cleric (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tagging for the renderer, probably. The mapper who added this has an unfortunate habit of tagging the canopy area of individual trees as very small natural=wood polygons. commented 2026-09-27 22:32:14 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,940 |
| 189609811 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189652258 commented 2026-09-27 22:26:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189609821 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189652258 commented 2026-09-27 22:26:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189609844 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189652258 commented 2026-09-27 22:26:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189609886 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189652258 commented 2026-09-27 22:26:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189648614 (Comments: 3) | peteruithoven (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik denk dat mijn fout was dat ik iets helemaal nieuws had gemaakt ipv een een bestaand adres te wijzigen. (Ik gebruikte GNOME Maps) commented 2026-09-27 22:04:04 UTC by peteruithoven ♦1 |
| 189564945 (Comments: 1) | Македонија (Discussed changesets: 2) | Тоа е старото име на стадионот! Не преименувај објекти без валиден извор на информации commented 2026-09-27 21:58:31 UTC by Tiramiso ♦3 |
| 81453916 (Comments: 1) | Chris Fleming (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello why does this changeset remove the name "Gritting Priority 2 roads" from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2621481 I've just seen this relation and want to know what it is currently mapping as it's not a route ba... commented 2026-09-27 21:58:14 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189503311 (Comments: 1) | nilogian (Discussed changesets: 15) | hai cancellato un parucchiere con desc del cs "CAI Sezione di Fivizzano" non penso... commented 2026-09-27 21:52:27 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦219 |
| 189641900 (Comments: 1) | Fredz007 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ahhhh, I see you edited your previous changeset! I ended up reviewing that first. Marked this bad due to the erroneous tags but it's all good now so dw about it saying reviewed bad below. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA |
| 189642609 (Comments: 1) | Fredz007 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for this contribution! Adding and updating addresses is critical to navigation using OSM so this goes a long way. The change looks good to me! Can't see any errors in the changes made and the previous tags loo... commented 2026-09-27 21:45:39 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189650164 (Comments: 1) | ChrisH100 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for contributing to the map! Changes like this are critical to navigation. Checked it over as you requested a review on this changeset, all looks good! Best of luck with future mapping! --- |
| 189650855 (Comments: 1) | sundew (Discussed changesets: 52) | Korrektur: Tour 20260719 .. Armdorf, Neuburg (Vor-Ort-Prüfung Postkästen, POIs, ein Storchennest, Geometrie, etc.) commented 2026-09-27 21:39:35 UTC by sundew ♦81 |
| 189650624 (Comments: 1) | sundew (Discussed changesets: 52) | Korrektur: Tour 20260719 .. Leer Ostfriesland Zentrum (Vor-Ort-Prüfung Postkästen, Packstationen, POIs, Geometrie, etc.) commented 2026-09-27 21:38:51 UTC by sundew ♦81 |
| 189523082 (Comments: 2) | guol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the comment Atlas I use JOSM and when I upload changes to OSM he won't delete the old building from the server that I deleted in JOSM. I try to correct that by going to the ID editor and delete the old buildings. commented 2026-09-27 21:37:45 UTC by guol ♦1 |
| 189555448 (Comments: 1) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 47) | Ciao toponomastica_comune_arenzano, come hai fatto a controllare che 280 km di strade sono asfaltati in poco più di due minuti? commented 2026-09-27 21:26:08 UTC by totera ♦364 |
| 189646915 (Comments: 2) | sasshasassha (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you map buildings with building=* tag, you need to map individual buildings, not the general area they are located in. For statistical occurence of buildings, we use landuse=residential, however landuse=residential is already mapped for areas that... commented 2026-09-27 21:03:14 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦31 |
| 189632135 (Comments: 4) | FormelessPuppy41 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Het was een bouwweg, maar ik zie nu op de luchtfoto geen metalen platen. Wanneer je niet weet wat het is wordt ook wel highway=road gebruikt. Dat geeft wel een foutmelding. Zou het even zo laten. Tijd voor een rondje Ambacht fietsen. |
| 189648857 (Comments: 4) | Abbas Chegini (Discussed changesets: 1) | باشه ، من مشکلی ندارم اما امیدوار بودم قبلش تحقیق کنی ببینی اخرین سالی که اونجا مدرسه بوده کی بوده و الان اصلا مدرسه هست اونجا؟! الان اون... commented 2026-09-27 20:51:34 UTC by Abbas Chegini ♦1 |
| 124626978 (Comments: 1) | Mouette85 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used bollard=rising_bollard on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9938783792/history Have you maybe meant bollard=rising ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2026-09-27 20:45:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189600948 (Comments: 6) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 113) | ah, ok i will add the name tomorrow when back on Netbook. commented 2026-09-27 20:37:05 UTC by 5R-MFT ♦96 |
| 189611371 (Comments: 1) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 41) | It seems to me that landuse=grass would be more appropriate. To me, leisure=garden reads more as a much more planned decorated space with flowers and other plants other than just grass. Other than that, this looks like a high quality changeset ☺️ commented 2026-09-27 20:36:57 UTC by VeeBack02 ♦2 |
| 189649146 (Comments: 1) | JackGilmore (Discussed changesets: 4) | I made a considerable adjustment to the residential landuse boundary for Cove here. Apologies in advance if this causes any issues 😅 commented 2026-09-27 20:27:34 UTC by JackGilmore ♦14 |
| 189416300 (Comments: 1) | MarTintamarre (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, par définition non : name \tCountryamping sauvage name:en \tWild camp C'est une redite de backcountry =yes commented 2026-09-27 20:22:16 UTC by trial ♦1,215 |
| 104128119 (Comments: 3) | MonsieurF (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tag sport=moto fixed in changeset changeset/189648415 (I hesitated between the values "motor" and "motorcycle"). commented 2026-09-27 20:12:41 UTC by laurent-38 ♦174 |
| 130116669 (Comments: 2) | BREYSSE JM (Discussed changesets: 10) | Tag sport=moto fixed in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189648415 (I hesitated between the values "motor" and "motorcycle"). commented 2026-09-27 20:10:50 UTC by laurent-38 ♦174 |
| 189369301 (Comments: 3) | dolph13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the link to the HOA site, I appreciate it. Your change looks good then. Do note that we can't use Google's maps or imagery to update OpenStreetMap (due to copyright restrictions). Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-27 20:01:51 UTC by pwbriggs ♦499 |
| 189647559 (Comments: 1) | peteruithoven (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dat Peter. Probeer svp op de adresnode bij te taggen. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-27 19:57:34 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189599898 (Comments: 4) | Radek_trz (Discussed changesets: 13) | Tak, też przejrzałem historię. Odcinek między Chrobrego a DW340 to zdecydowanie nie jest tertiary - to naprawdę wąska droga po wzgórzach. commented 2026-09-27 19:54:23 UTC by Radek_trz ♦12 |
| 189643897 (Comments: 3) | Kipper Anderson (Discussed changesets: 6) | Als bovenstaand aan gepast commented 2026-09-27 19:54:01 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189632005 (Comments: 1) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 31) | C'est à la fin des travaux que l'on enlève, non? commented 2026-09-27 19:51:30 UTC by 9_tab ♦156 |
| 124510935 (Comments: 1) | Местный 2 (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5542932 commented 2026-09-27 19:36:35 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,765 |
| 189610790 (Comments: 1) | midnight2024 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! Thanks for your contribution. Instead of deleting closed down premises (like node 2736278119 and node 13355297593) could you please consider marking them as disused or vacant so we can keep the history :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ke... commented 2026-09-27 19:35:36 UTC by JackGilmore ♦14 |
| 189647130 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 191) | Ако нещо съм сбъркал таговете за имената, коригирайте ме(или направо ги коригирайте). commented 2026-09-27 19:34:48 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 189605603 (Comments: 1) | Smoulina (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. For private access, you want access=private - access=no means no access to any transport mode at all. It was probably tagged access=destination on the assumption that the premises at the end the driveway would like to... commented 2026-09-27 19:27:00 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,940 |
| 188551376 (Comments: 3) | Qzeyy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba, cevabınız için teşekkür ederim. En güncel hava görüntülerinde bile bina yapımına başlandığının bile gözükmediği bir çok yer var. Belediye kayıtlarına bakmadım ancak kapı numaras... commented 2026-09-27 19:19:29 UTC by keyyushi ♦36 |
| 189567767 (Comments: 2) | DividedFrame (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks for the heads up, I wouldn't have noticed otherwise! I think I've fixed it. commented 2026-09-27 19:05:21 UTC by DividedFrame ♦6 |
| 189646242 (Comments: 1) | hauke-stieler (Discussed changesets: 48) | Details siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5524393 commented 2026-09-27 19:03:19 UTC by hauke-stieler ♦350 |
| 189645184 (Comments: 2) | arvan3844 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, ich habe das nochmal angepasst + mit oneway:bicycle=no. Die Beschilderung vor Ort ist (noch?) fehlerhaft. An der Kreuzung Steinworth/Marion-Donovan-Str. ist ein Schild "Einbahnstraße", ab dann folgt nichts mehr und es kommen ... commented 2026-09-27 19:02:45 UTC by arvan3844 ♦2 |
| 189643730 (Comments: 1) | WompatuckSupervisor (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on th... commented 2026-09-27 19:01:44 UTC by MassCartog ♦484 |
| 189641303 (Comments: 1) | m30wm30w (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, m30wm30w! Sugiro mapear o minishopping como área e colocar os POIs internos como pontos dentro dessa área. Abraço! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... commented 2026-09-27 18:58:03 UTC by adrianojbr ♦596 |
| 189607035 (Comments: 1) | RoBsx97 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Olá, RoBsx97! Evite apagar elementos, preferindo, se for o caso, corrigir a geometria com o fim de manter o histórico: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history Além disso, sugiro ver as boas práti... commented 2026-09-27 18:51:07 UTC by adrianojbr ♦596 |
| 189621157 (Comments: 1) | Max_Madhava_RD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Folgende Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen: - Hydranten sollten nicht mit anderen Linien und Flächen verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „... commented 2026-09-27 18:50:48 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 189587708 (Comments: 1) | smsm1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks! (re: note 5161083 about EV charging points around here) commented 2026-09-27 18:47:51 UTC by jayaddison ♦54 |
| 189642171 (Comments: 4) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 29) | Semmi gond. Telefonon eléggé körülményes geometriát szerkeszteni, arra inkább talán a webes szerkesztő vagy a JOSM megfelelőbb egy asztali gépen. Az általad használt Go Map el... commented 2026-09-27 18:47:08 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189618687 (Comments: 1) | Гонтарюк (Discussed changesets: 1) | що це і навіщо? commented 2026-09-27 18:46:41 UTC by kamasytrix ♦51 |
| 189268476 (Comments: 3) | griffin_greene (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, thanks for the clarification! You're all good, just needed to confirm that you could verify all the details you mapped between at least one of those other sources. Cheers! commented 2026-09-27 18:43:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189174933 (Comments: 3) | kosanceva (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gotcha, thanks for the clarification! commented 2026-09-27 18:42:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189512286 (Comments: 3) | Viorel-Cătălin Răpițeanu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks so much for the followup and detailed clarification--much appreciated. Cheers, and happy mapping! commented 2026-09-27 18:41:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189047552 (Comments: 4) | marijnc (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2026-09-27 18:41:17 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 170695459 (Comments: 14) | Davileci (Discussed changesets: 31) | I think I agree, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area is confusing. I wrote about this on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-station-halt-tagging-review-request/148096 commented 2026-09-27 18:40:55 UTC by Ian Jackson ♦3 |
| 189414590 (Comments: 1) | TaurusCB (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen: Hydranten sollten nicht mit anderen Linien und Flächen verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydr... commented 2026-09-27 18:30:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 188554792 (Comments: 1) | frspp import (Discussed changesets: 6) | this changeset added a duplicate building (it was marked abandoned:building, changed now to abandoned=yes instead) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168859973/ commented 2026-09-27 18:29:04 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦111 |
| 182822166 (Comments: 1) | jayaddison (Discussed changesets: 10) | I was mistaken about the location of the relief map in this changeset, and should not have edited the co-ordinates. I will relocate it back to the correct position soon. commented 2026-09-27 18:28:40 UTC by jayaddison ♦54 |
| 189635533 (Comments: 6) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 85) | Промених и стойността на outdoor_seating от "yes" на "separate" за сладкарничката, според указанията в Уикито. commented 2026-09-27 18:26:14 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 189606723 (Comments: 2) | Sammyhawkrad (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for notifying me. I'm merging them commented 2026-09-27 18:18:22 UTC by Sammyhawkrad ♦190 |
| 189613014 (Comments: 2) | Nelvana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks - I've removed the tag. I appreciate the feedback. commented 2026-09-27 18:13:57 UTC by Nelvana ♦1 |
| 189643984 (Comments: 1) | Kipper Anderson (Discussed changesets: 6) | Svp niet name= gebruiken commented 2026-09-27 18:09:43 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189644153 (Comments: 1) | Kipper Anderson (Discussed changesets: 6) | .. amenity=charging_station Kijk in dr wiki hoe zoiets te mappen. Niet name= gebruiken We kennen brand en operator. commented 2026-09-27 18:09:11 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189627880 (Comments: 1) | LesiakowskiDamian90 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nazwa parkingu jest nieprawidłowa. Poprawiłem Twoją edycję usuwając nazwę (nie dajemy nazw opisowych) i jednocześnie ustawiłem tag `operator=Nadleśnictwo Młynary` https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189644134 commented 2026-09-27 18:08:28 UTC by Marek-M ♦1,118 |
| 189600694 (Comments: 2) | fibni (Discussed changesets: 1) | Det skal jeg nok lade være med fremover. Tak for "rappet over fingren" commented 2026-09-27 18:08:17 UTC by fibni ♦1 |
| 189639594 (Comments: 1) | GPMapper (Discussed changesets: 70) | Здравствувйте. Во первых, не военная, а войсковая. Во вторых, в osm обычно используется сокращение В/Ч Будет хорошо если поправите commented 2026-09-27 18:00:48 UTC by solenoid jam ♦209 |
| 171706702 (Comments: 2) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 73) | właśnie tak się zastanawiam, co 902N robi na trasie M1 XD commented 2026-09-27 17:43:54 UTC by zuicz ♦323 |
| 189612936 (Comments: 1) | Lucky_Cat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution! commented 2026-09-27 17:39:46 UTC by citrula ♦1,018 |
| 189641243 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 191) | Интересно, че при опит за добавяне и на бл. 10 и бл. 12А към този мултиполигон(релацията), в първия случай не ми дава грешка, а във втория случ... commented 2026-09-27 17:38:47 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 52921606 (Comments: 1) | DenisJu (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi DenisJu, I have updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3894187051 based on observation on the road. I removed payment:* tags which might have changed and the source:*, please revert them if necessary. commented 2026-09-27 17:33:24 UTC by Enock4seth ♦685 |
| 152184358 (Comments: 1) | austinthecat_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605409005/history has building:flats = 16A;16B;16C;16D that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to expres... commented 2026-09-27 17:31:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189558841 (Comments: 1) | RotaryFool566 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I have standardised to motor_vehicle=no + bus=designated along the sections that are bus only, and I have removed bus=yes from the sections of Bridge Street that aren't restricted (it isn't necessary to add bus=yes to normal roads) commented 2026-09-27 17:28:10 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦389 |
| 189622845 (Comments: 1) | Thomas Arrow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for taking the time to contribute. I've marked this changeset as bad because I feel it damages the map data but please don't let this put you off. You ended up adding the `obstacle=dense_vegetation` to the whole... commented 2026-09-27 17:23:41 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189614211 (Comments: 1) | Dávid2015hu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Üdv. Úgy tűnik több nagy területet is elmozgattál véletlenül. Visszavontam és berajzoltam az utat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189642171 commented 2026-09-27 17:21:46 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189619007 (Comments: 2) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 283) | Nie wiem. Ja arkad nie mapowałem, moja edycja polegała na tym by teren ogrodów nie renderowal się na całym pałacu bo nie na całym one są commented 2026-09-27 17:15:13 UTC by voltairovicz ♦255 |
| 189608289 (Comments: 1) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 73) | zniknęły niektóre dodane przedtem przystanki commented 2026-09-27 17:13:33 UTC by zuicz ♦323 |
| 189640285 (Comments: 1) | Dávid2015hu (Discussed changesets: 2) | Üdv. Kérlek a módosításokhoz mindig adj meg leírást, amiben összefoglalod röviden, mit változtattál! commented 2026-09-27 17:13:08 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189629595 (Comments: 1) | sam1818 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for contributing to the map! Your change all looks correct in terms of the tags. Just wanted to check that the road here is signed as private access or that it is otherwise clear that it is private? I'v... commented 2026-09-27 17:10:51 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189631334 (Comments: 1) | Chester Fester (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for adding these details to the map! Just looked over your changeset and it all looks correct. Best of luck with mapping! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published usi... commented 2026-09-27 17:02:33 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189640683 (Comments: 1) | Swiftarf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bore da Adding motor_vehicle=no here doesn't look right, how do the residents and delivery drivers get to the properties. Oneway=no should only be used in areas where most roads are oneway to indicate that a mapper has looked at it and not... commented 2026-09-27 16:59:40 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,827 |
| 189591671 (Comments: 4) | wolfy1339 (Discussed changesets: 19) | OK, parfait! Il faudra se rappeler de réaligner les voies et les échangeurs quand les photos seront mises à jour. commented 2026-09-27 16:57:51 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦550 |
| 189625178 (Comments: 7) | Fizzyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | All done. Please check and say if you think anything needs changing. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-09-27 16:56:55 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,387 |
| 189175671 (Comments: 2) | Win32netsky (Discussed changesets: 27) | Außerdem gibt es noch die Route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21407214 Ist das das selbe? commented 2026-09-27 16:48:03 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,194 |
| 189630842 (Comments: 1) | ÚtKár (Discussed changesets: 2) | Üdv. Most akkor pince vagy barlang? Ha pince, akkor name helyett elég egy abandoned:man_made=cellar_entrance jelölés is. commented 2026-09-27 16:42:27 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 144129131 (Comments: 2) | biketeur (Discussed changesets: 22) | offset_pent_roof means the same as gabled_height_moved. commented 2026-09-27 16:25:02 UTC by biketeur ♦3 |
 | 144981331 (Comments: 3) | NicaTopo (Discussed changesets: 13) | fixed three wiki pages, thanks for checking and fixing in OSM database BTW, there is also https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/crop=cana-de-a%C3%A7%C3%BAcar which looks like more of badly tagged sugar cane but edits adding those may b... commented 2026-09-27 16:19:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189615663 (Comments: 1) | Hayb (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset broke the border relation/1803010: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1803010#map=15/31.88288/35.17938&layers=V Either you restore Ramallah or you remove completely. commented 2026-09-27 16:12:34 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦87 |
| 189611386 (Comments: 1) | JULIANO BARCIK (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset left two broken borders: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/297514#map=16/-25.37497/-49.20980&layers=V https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/297809#map=16/-25.37773/-49.20577&layers=V Can please review... commented 2026-09-27 16:10:51 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦87 |
| 189626318 (Comments: 3) | Gurkis (Discussed changesets: 1) | You should find an object which is known to be 100% accurate and change your offset. commented 2026-09-27 15:57:31 UTC by L4PSA ♦11 |
| 189588080 (Comments: 1) | Lokalfuerst (Discussed changesets: 98) | Moin ich stolper eben über eine Änderung von dir und sehe, dass in den Metadaten deiner Änderung oft steht, dass du Esri Hintergrundbilder nutzt und dabei passt du Geometrien an. Wenn du in Hessen, NRW und anderen Bundesl... commented 2026-09-27 15:56:07 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,361 |
| 189606636 (Comments: 1) | iszulik101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, greens and fairways shouldn't overlap (lines shouldn't cross each other). Also, golf=hole lines shouldn't connect to other lines between the tee and the green. commented 2026-09-27 15:56:06 UTC by b-jazz ♦954 |
| 189494017 (Comments: 3) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 191) | Просто като ограничение/преграда може да се добави с barrier=yes. Въпреки че някои валидатори може да дадат предупреждение, защото не е със "... commented 2026-09-27 15:53:40 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 189629339 (Comments: 2) | janek2013 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Z tą miejscowością Radosław było dobrze, zrobiłeś źle. Po co każdy landuse=residential podpisujesz tagiem name? Wystarczy jeden punkt ze znacznikiem miejscowości, nie ma co rozmieniać się na drobne. commented 2026-09-27 15:52:45 UTC by Szymson ♦560 |
| 189636338 (Comments: 1) | janek2013 (Discussed changesets: 2) | No nie no tak to nie, po co te opisowe człony nazw? commented 2026-09-27 15:48:07 UTC by Szymson ♦560 |
| 189518013 (Comments: 4) | infeeeee (Discussed changesets: 23) | Visszaraktam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189637474 commented 2026-09-27 15:47:52 UTC by infeeeee ♦724 |
| 178872034 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 52) | Не би ли трябвало "Вая" да е loc_name=* ? commented 2026-09-27 15:47:44 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦78 |
| 189626667 (Comments: 1) | Kram_xfly (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset added a duplicate of an already mapped feature, in OSM we try and avoid duplicates. Next time if you want to edit a feature that already exists please check that the feature isn't already mapped. If it is already mapped please edi... commented 2026-09-27 15:41:19 UTC by Udarian ♦949 |
| 188584958 (Comments: 2) | APneunzehn74 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hmm ja aktuell eigentlich nichts mehr, im Prinzip wäre es eher irgend etwas mit historic, ähnlich einer Hochwassern Markierung. commented 2026-09-27 15:38:00 UTC by APneunzehn74 ♦166 |
| 189607132 (Comments: 1) | flapnuta (Discussed changesets: 2) | Buenas, la etiqueta cycleway=opposite es obsoleta, siendo más adecuado oneway:bicycle=no, que ya estaba puesta en el carrer de Martí. Saludos commented 2026-09-27 15:24:48 UTC by marcmarti ♦110 |
| 189636097 (Comments: 1) | TheUKHighStreet (Discussed changesets: 30) | Not all - but definitely this one. commented 2026-09-27 15:23:55 UTC by TheUKHighStreet ♦29 |
| 188008597 (Comments: 1) | Jdhdbsbs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Shift the location (of both) one or two light poles northwest. commented 2026-09-27 15:19:43 UTC by David_CottonFarmer ♦1 |
| 185657341 (Comments: 1) | SpiritOfPhotography (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ja, mag sein, aber dann reicht die biycycle=use_sidepath Es ist unnötig und irreführend, hier access=no zu taggen. Und einige Straßen, die du so getaggt hast, haben gar keinen benutzungsplichtigen Radweg. commented 2026-09-27 15:15:45 UTC by MrBean ♦10 |
| 189627813 (Comments: 1) | Jordan Leick (Discussed changesets: 8) | I rode the entire stretch of the new Bassett creek trail on Friday and there were still parts where construction crew were working on. I dodged a big mound of dirt and a claw machine when I biked west to connect to Douglas. The project manager also c... commented 2026-09-27 15:13:10 UTC by Huong Dang ♦10 |
| 189632283 (Comments: 1) | Don Flanders (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I changed the name-tag "Gustav Engineering Testnet" into "Bitcoin ATM" like before as "Gustav Engineering Testnet" is already mentioned in the operator-tag. A description like "Gustav I is a BTM for buyin... commented 2026-09-27 15:08:14 UTC by Comino ♦416 |
| 189626172 (Comments: 2) | shelter_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Vielen Dank, habs korrigiert commented 2026-09-27 15:08:10 UTC by shelter_ ♦3 |
| 189632731 (Comments: 1) | Don Flanders (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I changed the name-tag "Gustav Engineering Testnet" into "Bitcoin ATM" like before as "Gustav Engineering Testnet" is already mentioned in the operator-tag. A description like "Gustav I is a BTM for buyin... commented 2026-09-27 15:07:30 UTC by Comino ♦416 |
| 189631875 (Comments: 2) | BoxerDima (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189634665 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-27 14:54:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189632734 (Comments: 2) | BoxerDima (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189634665 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-27 14:54:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189632035 (Comments: 2) | BoxerDima (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189634665 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-27 14:54:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189634665 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 131) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189631875, 189632035, 189632734. commented 2026-09-27 14:54:32 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189634559 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 131) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189631875, 189632035, 189632734. commented 2026-09-27 14:52:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189526930 (Comments: 1) | ozfhbgc (Discussed changesets: 1) | 안녕하세요. 이번에 name=CU를 name=CU 하남시청점으로 변경하신 근거를 확인할 수 있을까요? OSM에서 name=*은 현장 간판 등에서 확인되는 실제 명칭을 기록하는 태그입니다. 단순히 다른 지... commented 2026-09-27 14:51:59 UTC by KennyDap ♦92 |
| 189621489 (Comments: 1) | trrrem (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Would you please have a second look there. This place is named "Compost du Moulin à Légumes" and had been mapped as accepting green waste. In this edit you changed this and made this container no lo... commented 2026-09-27 14:50:37 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,087 |
| 189609925 (Comments: 1) | Zapallar ๋ ࣭ ⭑๋ ࣭ ⭑ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Por favor poner atención a la calidad de los dibujos. aquí solo 5 de las casas coinciden mas o menos con lo que observa en las fotos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... commented 2026-09-27 14:47:07 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 131838736 (Comments: 3) | HektorSchlegel (Discussed changesets: 7) | noch ne Frage: Wenn nicht sicher ist ob photovoltaic oder thermal, warum pappt man ein fixme dran und taggt trotzdem (nach Luftbild) eins von beiden? [fixme=photovoltaic or thermal collector?] [generator:method=photovoltaic] Wäre e... commented 2026-09-27 14:43:05 UTC by HirschKauz ♦295 |
| 189293084 (Comments: 2) | swaree (Discussed changesets: 14) | hola Marc, disculpa per les edicions errònies. si no s'ha fet ja, em compromet a canviar-les o ara o quan s'actualitze el NSI, que el seguisc de ben a prop. Salutacions, commented 2026-09-27 14:39:29 UTC by swaree ♦13 |
| 189625798 (Comments: 1) | MustafaOyunda155 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Merhaba. Eklediğiniz otobüs rotası ilişkilerinde bazı duraklara platform rolü koymayı unutmuşsunuz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21447206 ve https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21447207 'nin de opening_hours=* etik... commented 2026-09-27 14:33:35 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦287 |
| 184643454 (Comments: 1) | Satisfação (Discussed changesets: 45) | Esse trecho possui placas de velocidade de 60 km/h, e não 80 km/h pelo que você alterou. Vandalismo commented 2026-09-27 14:28:42 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦96 |
| 189629032 (Comments: 2) | feczkob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Szia, köszi a tippet, fixáltam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189632862 commented 2026-09-27 14:20:04 UTC by feczkob ♦1 |
| 189595315 (Comments: 1) | Mustafa owowow (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merhaba. Kendiniz zaten eklediğiniz birçok hayali şeyi silmişsiniz. Kalanları da değişikliklerinizi geri alarak ben sildim. Lütfen OpenStreetMap'e gerçekte bulunmayan şeyleri eklemeyiniz. İyi günler. |
| 187573256 (Comments: 3) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 325) | Viac informácií o spôsobe mapovania adries tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:* Podrobnejšie informácie o slovenskom a českom systéme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/... commented 2026-09-27 14:12:58 UTC by mapperue ♦248 |
| 189614867 (Comments: 1) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Why did you delete the slip roads here? Also when you deleted them you forgot to update/delete several of the restrictions which included them. commented 2026-09-27 14:09:16 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦43 |
| 189632073 (Comments: 1) | sahshoor (Discussed changesets: 25) | From old survey notes from last Summer. commented 2026-09-27 14:08:16 UTC by sahshoor ♦32 |
| 180830782 (Comments: 1) | aquaffe (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hei, ...durch Zufall aufgefallen... Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998116826 hast du "UW Siegadel" gesetzt. Ist das richtig? Welchen Zusammenhang gibt es denn mit Siegadel, was doch weiterweg ist...? Danke, Sven commented 2026-09-27 14:06:47 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,194 |
| 189258220 (Comments: 1) | yopaseopor (Discussed changesets: 152) | Bones, segur que aquest enllaç realment existeix? A la ortofoto provisional que tinc no em surt aquest enllaç, ni les obres semblen haver començat. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1560534249 Salut commented 2026-09-27 14:00:08 UTC by marcmarti ♦110 |
| 189627243 (Comments: 1) | Hepos (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Hepos, hat das Büro der Grünen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11006103861 Mittwochs wirklich von 00:00-17:00 geöffnet ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-09-27 13:59:29 UTC by Zrop ♦172 |
| 189627167 (Comments: 1) | Hepos (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Hepos, ist der linke Gehweg hier wirklich betoniert worden ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-09-27 13:55:48 UTC by Zrop ♦172 |
| 178468165 (Comments: 1) | WORLANYO _WORLAS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi WORLANYO _WORLAS, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please zoom in enough to see existing features. Do not map over existing features like you did here for the building which was already mapped. This create duplicates. I have delete the duplicate building... commented 2026-09-27 13:52:32 UTC by Enock4seth ♦685 |
| 189629671 (Comments: 1) | imfromkorealol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Please don't just randomly add stuff based on old imagery. The hostel was already there, and this road is just a track: w1562760293 commented 2026-09-27 13:51:17 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189560865 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 90) | Hallo, is called Fala language: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fala_language Only has ISO 639-3, since it's really minority: https://iso639-3.sil.org/code/fax commented 2026-09-27 13:44:53 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦352 |
| 189515568 (Comments: 1) | Zapallar ๋ ࣭ ⭑๋ ࣭ ⭑ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Algo de esto es verdad? no se observa nada parecido en las fotos satelitales. Además, por favor no pegar usos de suelo a los caminos. gracias --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2026-09-27 13:43:04 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189454409 (Comments: 1) | RotaryFool566 (Discussed changesets: 4) | (Review requested) You have added oneway:psv=no tags to a few streets. Assuming that these are contraflow bus lanes, you need to tag the transport mode(s) which are allowed as they are actually signed for bus (and separately for any of bicycle... commented 2026-09-27 13:40:30 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,940 |
| 188991325 (Comments: 1) | adrian87bp (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola adrian87bp, Muchas gracias por editar en Segovia importando las geometrías de los edificios desde el Catastro, pero recuerda, esto es Segovia y el Catastro no actualiza su información con el rigor que sería adecuado.<... commented 2026-09-27 13:28:37 UTC by Arturo Francisco Barbero ♦71 |
| 188556530 (Comments: 2) | ludo7620 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry, my mistake ! conformation is indeed not correct here. I'm fixing it right now. commented 2026-09-27 12:54:35 UTC by ludo7620 ♦3 |
| 189626123 (Comments: 3) | BRCKD (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Jochen, danke für die schnelle Review. Gucke ich mir beides gleich mal an. commented 2026-09-27 12:29:04 UTC by BRCKD ♦4 |
| 189538954 (Comments: 3) | mtmail (Discussed changesets: 56) | Ohje. Danke. Ich werde das dann erstmal beobachten commented 2026-09-27 12:17:25 UTC by mtmail ♦174 |
| 189605159 (Comments: 1) | Bobropiton (Discussed changesets: 62) | а не должно ли стоять Москва-Черкизово вместо Восточный вокзал в теге to ? commented 2026-09-27 12:15:57 UTC by literan ♦7,237 |
| 189625211 (Comments: 1) | wvd83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-27 12:14:31 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189431957 (Comments: 3) | wheelmap_visitor (Discussed changesets: 121) | Die Statusseite verweist auf die Kontaktmöglichkeit über news.wheelmap.org/en/contact/ für die anonymen Benutzer der Webseite. Find ich komisch, dass die als doch bemerkenswert großer Proxy nicht hier in den OSM-Diskussionen teil... commented 2026-09-27 12:06:48 UTC by seewäldler ♦181 |
| 188958158 (Comments: 3) | Mehmet Bey (Discussed changesets: 12) | @HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi detaylı bilgilendirmeniz için teşekkürler, demek ki bu hesapların değişikliklerini takip etmek şart. commented 2026-09-27 12:04:22 UTC by marmara_editor ♦18 |
| 189547952 (Comments: 1) | 3alei (Discussed changesets: 8) | Добрый день. Пожалуйста не используйте уточняющий тег service=driveway для проездов по АЗС. Этот тег для конечных подъездных дорожек самого ниж... commented 2026-09-27 11:55:10 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,294 |
| 188707518 (Comments: 1) | dornweg (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hallo, ist es Absicht, dass du die Straße "Im Hörning" als Einbahnstraße gesetzt hast? Meiner Kenntnis nach, ist das keine Einbahnstraße. Konnte auch keine Infos dazu finden. War aber schon einige Wochen nicht m... commented 2026-09-27 11:51:42 UTC by mapper65363 ♦9 |
| 189623648 (Comments: 2) | Bitzadmin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Eggie, bedankt voor de feedback, ik heb inderdaad het voetpad over het hoofd gezien, deze is natuurlijk nog steeds toegangbaar, alleen het niet vanaf de Nijnselseweg en ook niet voor het verkeer wat daarop rijdt. commented 2026-09-27 11:44:38 UTC by Bitzadmin ♦1 |
| 189546316 (Comments: 1) | 3alei (Discussed changesets: 8) | Добрый день. Согласно рекомендациям, дорога residential должна быть соединена дорогой не меньшим классом с остальной сетью дорог. У вас улица ... commented 2026-09-27 11:33:43 UTC by Dimacn ♦1,294 |
| 189488960 (Comments: 1) | Elizaveta Kolesova (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You've added an aquarium in the middle of a mountain slope. What did you mean? commented 2026-09-27 11:30:22 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189529441 (Comments: 1) | giosal (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted it because names in Georgia must not be in English, and settlement must not have religion and addr:postcode tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189625106 commented 2026-09-27 11:27:22 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 187976286 (Comments: 1) | Fullgas1 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Prosím o viac popisné a zmysluplné popisy tvojich zmien. "Úprava podľa aktuálneho stavu" nehovorí nič o tom čo si zmenil a prečo. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comm... commented 2026-09-27 11:21:46 UTC by Tomas_J ♦426 |
| 182632463 (Comments: 2) | Fullgas1 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zdar. Vďaka za príspevok do mapy. Zmenené trasy v teréne nemaž, ak je to možné , ideálne je ich iba posunúť alebo použiť funkciu Replace geometry pre zachovanie histórie objektov. Tiež pred ka... commented 2026-09-27 11:18:52 UTC by Tomas_J ♦426 |
| 189595028 (Comments: 2) | Mikheil741 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I re-added the restaurant. You can see its properties here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14221972465 Please note that I added it as a separate node, have a look at the format of the working hours and phone number. Also, I've added li... commented 2026-09-27 11:14:50 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦326 |
| 189504984 (Comments: 1) | hlescot (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189624437 commented 2026-09-27 11:13:08 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189152536 (Comments: 1) | capt_planet (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ten segment way/1378040074 to są miejsca postojowe a nie parking aisle, tu się da tylko przejść pieszo pomiędzy miejscami parkingowymi, nie da się przejechać commented 2026-09-27 11:12:40 UTC by Hoodiecrow ♦3 |
| 189621201 (Comments: 3) | Rens Oliemans (Discussed changesets: 14) | Duidelijk eggie, dank voor de tip! commented 2026-09-27 11:09:05 UTC by Rens Oliemans ♦7 |
| 189624438 (Comments: 1) | ItaliA1delSole (Discussed changesets: 32) | sito ufficiale Autostrade per l'Italia: https://www.autostrade.it/it/comunicazione-e-media/comunicati-stampa-viabilita/-/bulletin/view/9f7b9b5d-24ce-4a5f-a8f6-a290465e581b commented 2026-09-27 11:08:55 UTC by ItaliA1delSole ♦16 |
| 189610285 (Comments: 2) | matze089 (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi klik, wahrscheinlich hast du recht. Aber eigentlich habe ich nur den Namen geändert. Ob und in welcher Form dieser Biergarten nach Betreiberwechsel noch besteht, habe ich auf ihrer Webseite nicht erkennen können. Auf Instagramm schrei... commented 2026-09-27 11:06:22 UTC by matze089 ♦46 |
| 186523763 (Comments: 9) | Illio (Discussed changesets: 53) | Za mňa je toto OK. Ten Sad Janka Kráľa upravím. commented 2026-09-27 11:06:02 UTC by Illio ♦96 |
| 189481918 (Comments: 1) | Hamid@farokhi (Discussed changesets: 1) | لطفا موقع ادیت نقشه دقت کنید. با جابهجایی خیابانها، نقشه را خراب کرده بودید. commented 2026-09-27 10:56:44 UTC by sajjad_samaei ♦8 |
| 189392261 (Comments: 2) | WANTES (Discussed changesets: 12) | У меня тоже вопрос, тебя кто просил удалять, ты её туда вносил? Хорошая тропа, по которой постоянно ходят люди, верни её обратно! commented 2026-09-27 10:48:51 UTC by vladislav_les ♦1 |
| 180323095 (Comments: 4) | mama we (Discussed changesets: 10) | though leaf_type on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20367343/history may also benefit from such change commented 2026-09-27 10:47:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189583964 (Comments: 1) | eri jahai (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in changeset 189623561 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189583964 commented 2026-09-27 10:46:08 UTC by sajjad_samaei ♦8 |
| 189509723 (Comments: 2) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 283) | Szczerze nie wiem, bo taką informację znalazłem na fb na Radomskie Inwestycje, o sinsayu nie wspominali ale w sumie mniejsza z tym, i tak jak będzie otwarcie doda się odpowiednie POIs. commented 2026-09-27 10:44:55 UTC by voltairovicz ♦255 |
| 189618779 (Comments: 1) | klimpetje (Discussed changesets: 24) | Dag klimpetje.. Een officieel wandelpad (footway) zal het niet zijn. Dan eerder een highway=path Wanneer er geen doorkomen aan is dat kun je smoothness=impassable toevoegen. Is het niet meer als pad herkenbaar dan disused:highway=path taggen (... commented 2026-09-27 10:27:02 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 188056022 (Comments: 1) | Cadastro Técnico (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bom dia! Quando você faz a edição você já atualiza os dados mapeados, uma dica para melhorar a qualidade do seu mapeamento é no comentário adicionar o nome do que está mapeando. ... commented 2026-09-27 10:24:28 UTC by Raphael-UMBRAOSM ♦1 |
| 170024957 (Comments: 1) | ynerant (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5541990 ? commented 2026-09-27 10:22:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 156408839 (Comments: 2) | frosm (Discussed changesets: 28) | thanks for the feedback. look like a typo, the meaning is the office is related to a compagny doing postal stuff but not being LaPoste (like DHL for ex). in the mean time, another used added another incompatible main tag, see https://www.openst... commented 2026-09-27 10:21:52 UTC by frosm ♦1,162 |
| 184985890 (Comments: 1) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 91) | bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3702581428/history je ne comprend pas ta modifcation : c'est un bureau d'une entreprise (tel que renseigner avant) ou c'est l'emplacement d'une machine où recevoir et e... commented 2026-09-27 10:19:24 UTC by frosm ♦1,162 |
| 189616037 (Comments: 2) | Essential Momentum Melissen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Format aangepast commented 2026-09-27 10:19:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189605895 (Comments: 1) | openstreetmapeditor0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen! A building:levels=* címkét épületeken használjuk, és azt jelenti, hány szintes az adott épület. Az, hogy egy üzlet melyik emeleten találh... commented 2026-09-27 10:16:07 UTC by infeeeee ♦724 |
| 189588932 (Comments: 2) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 85) | changeset/189622311 commented 2026-09-27 10:13:38 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 180783611 (Comments: 2) | Snusmumriken (Discussed changesets: 48) | Well spotted, thanks commented 2026-09-27 10:12:43 UTC by Snusmumriken ♦164 |
| 189590800 (Comments: 1) | StinkerWiesenHautzen161 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, bist Du dir sicher, dass deine Einträge für Namen von Objekten so korrekt sind? Viele der "name" Einträge bei der Schule in Rodgau würde ich eher als "ref" erfassen. Was definitv gar nicht geht... commented 2026-09-27 10:04:40 UTC by klik ♦56 |
| 189416712 (Comments: 1) | Madalin1978 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Look like duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803006522? commented 2026-09-27 10:03:59 UTC by Sanniu ♦694 |
| 188249961 (Comments: 2) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 166) | Clearly it is mistake when splitting. Resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189621511 commented 2026-09-27 09:56:44 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦747 |
| 184062002 (Comments: 2) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 58) | I've fixed it, thank you! commented 2026-09-27 09:56:06 UTC by Taurus3 ♦24 |
 | 189593625 (Comments: 1) | bcd4e6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://c.openstreetmap.org/t/too-many-changeset-are-having-large-bounding-box/148123/4 for discussion. commented 2026-09-27 09:44:52 UTC by 9_tab ♦156 |
| 189579123 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | @kingkingHK The one lower rank might be argued for by serving `=trunk` , and here both bounds of Po Kong Village Rd being important. But the section to the west might need to be considered `=trunk` by existing definition. (And actually `=primary` vs ... commented 2026-09-27 09:40:06 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,054 |
| 189508795 (Comments: 10) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | The hypothetical `=service` road would even have a broader `=private` , perhaps should be `=customers` for everyone with relevant matters there (prepared to change others) commented 2026-09-27 09:34:13 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,054 |
 | 25049571 (Comments: 1) | SOGEFI (Discussed changesets: 6) | what standing=very_low means ? see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300497520/history ? also, what is the license of data imported here ? commented 2026-09-27 09:24:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 118213207 (Comments: 1) | jennaod (Discussed changesets: 1) | what standing=low means? commented 2026-09-27 09:22:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 62686013 (Comments: 1) | Piet128 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello! way/238147120/history has building:levels = 3,3 that was added in this edit and later changed to 3.3 building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some d... commented 2026-09-27 09:21:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189501790 (Comments: 7) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | @vectorial8192 I would give `bridge=` some positive val as long as a lane is significantly bridged, similar to `covered=partial` commented 2026-09-27 09:21:13 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,054 |
| 171150081 (Comments: 2) | söm4324 (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62686013#map=14/52.00007/8.51010&layers=N was the changeset that added 3,3 as building:levels. I just corrected 3,3 to 3.3. commented 2026-09-27 09:11:25 UTC by söm4324 ♦72 |
| 185145802 (Comments: 13) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | @vectorial8192 We are not arguing about whether it's good policy or design, or software needs it. It legally exists as physically signposted in reality. commented 2026-09-27 09:08:33 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,054 |
| 189616688 (Comments: 1) | Aleksandr882427 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. Heeft de winkel ook een naam? MVG eggie commented 2026-09-27 09:04:10 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189604048 (Comments: 3) | kokosnoot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Als bovenstaand aangepast commented 2026-09-27 08:59:24 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 169672176 (Comments: 2) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 158) | Hi Chester and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Do you mean this cafe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/602221002 If so, follow that link, make sure you're logged in to OpenStreetMap, and then click on the "Edit" button near t... commented 2026-09-27 08:56:40 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦346 |
| 189616019 (Comments: 1) | Jan Rolleman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-27 08:50:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 163025940 (Comments: 1) | WidoWoicik (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please use an appropriate tag such as name:de commented 2026-09-27 08:49:19 UTC by matteobott ♦14 |
| 189603761 (Comments: 1) | tumtrahS (Discussed changesets: 13) | Moin, ich habe das auf Sep-Oct gesetzt, damit es maschinenlesbar wird. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-27 08:47:22 UTC by limes11 ♦1,112 |
| 189445025 (Comments: 2) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 85) | Вече би трябвало да съм изтрил всички драсканици и затворил бележките, по които работата е приключена. commented 2026-09-27 08:46:50 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦78 |
| 189468963 (Comments: 2) | limes11 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Danke! commented 2026-09-27 08:35:59 UTC by limes11 ♦1,112 |
| 189618326 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 85) | Лагера се има предвид, не знам какъв Лозенец ме хвана. commented 2026-09-27 08:35:02 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦78 |
| 121391181 (Comments: 1) | IanH (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5541802 ? commented 2026-09-27 08:34:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 56152656 (Comments: 1) | u1138 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5541803 ? commented 2026-09-27 08:33:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 130205429 (Comments: 1) | CirnoBaka (Discussed changesets: 10) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5541804 ? commented 2026-09-27 08:33:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 151402887 (Comments: 5) | bartek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Przywróciłem poprzednie otagowanie. commented 2026-09-27 08:15:59 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,377 |
| 189301608 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189617667 commented 2026-09-27 08:12:55 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
 | 189316075 (Comments: 1) | AdriaWave (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189617542 commented 2026-09-27 08:09:06 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 187385608 (Comments: 6) | Toygar Alak (Discussed changesets: 13) | Rica ediyorum eklediğim servis yollarını silmeyin. commented 2026-09-27 08:05:19 UTC by yitimox ♦46 |
| 189615469 (Comments: 1) | Cowboy79 (Discussed changesets: 41) | Moin, das mit den changset kommentaren hatten wir ja schon. Ich hatte ja sehr deutlich gemacht das das kein umgang miteinander ist und ignorant gegenüber anderen Mappern. OSM ist ein Teamsport und changesets die kommunikation untereina... commented 2026-09-27 08:00:28 UTC by flohoff ♦2,599 |
| 189303053 (Comments: 1) | sebastian35346 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189617146 commented 2026-09-27 07:55:35 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189543778 (Comments: 5) | Fox_45 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nouvelles corrections. Je ne sais pas si c'est complet car j'ai des difficultés à trouver le tracé des différentes lignes. Merci de votre aide en tout cas commented 2026-09-27 07:53:49 UTC by Fox_45 ♦1 |
| 189616705 (Comments: 1) | cricalix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Needs to be reverted, put in wrong place. commented 2026-09-27 07:51:08 UTC by cricalix ♦1 |
| 178241217 (Comments: 2) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 65) | A typo, corrected. Thank you for noticing commented 2026-09-27 07:37:04 UTC by Op'tRad ♦72 |
| 189338070 (Comments: 6) | einufo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Peter, habe mir die Diskussion im Forum reingezogen. man_made passt besser, stimmt. Sollte im Wiki für Deutschland eingetragen werden. Bei der Angabe des Durchmessers habe ich gepfuscht. ref habe ich (leider) nicht erfasst. Werde meine 4 H... commented 2026-09-27 07:35:51 UTC by einufo ♦15 |
| 189288365 (Comments: 1) | bjorn83 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189616323 commented 2026-09-27 07:33:27 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189283858 (Comments: 1) | 瓦特比 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189615928 commented 2026-09-27 07:21:12 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189319897 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189615809 commented 2026-09-27 07:17:16 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189278444 (Comments: 1) | livelaughtoasterbarth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189615751 commented 2026-09-27 07:14:11 UTC by ajmat ♦578 |
| 189591031 (Comments: 2) | ChaudGuy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Da war ich mir leider nicht sicher und habe deshalb nichts angefasst. Sollte ich nächste Woche irgendwann prüfen können. commented 2026-09-27 07:04:57 UTC by ChaudGuy ♦2 |
| 184076163 (Comments: 4) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Thanks. I don't know what route=n/a is supposed to mean and/or why route=bicycle is better, which is why I brought this up with you who knows much, much more about all these routes than I do. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-27 07:02:30 UTC by pwbriggs ♦499 |
| 189576906 (Comments: 1) | imrajatswami (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I've reverted this changeset because there were problems with almost all of the features you added, warnings were given above. Were these changes just fiction or a test/tryout? If so please don't do this, OSM is a live worldwide databas... commented 2026-09-27 06:59:10 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,387 |
| 188042920 (Comments: 2) | Alex Kushnaryov (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is a cable crossing over the river at this location. You need to bring your own harness system to cross the mountain river. I have marked the exact spot. Please excuse me if I made any mistakes; feel free to correct them. I am away from my comp... commented 2026-09-27 06:40:50 UTC by Alex Kushnaryov ♦1 |
| 189614397 (Comments: 1) | Crownie_O (Discussed changesets: 1) | Flock camera placed in this spot on 26 September 2026. It has flashing lights and is shining directly into the backyards on the other side of the fence line; approximately 20 feet from the fence. commented 2026-09-27 06:21:00 UTC by Crownie_O ♦1 |
| 189440067 (Comments: 1) | SzPaula (Discussed changesets: 28) | Szia! Az utcanév (sajnos) nem helyesírási kérdés, hivatalosan és az utcatáblán is kötőjellel van. (volt még régebben) Kék-Duna sétány. ... commented 2026-09-27 06:15:53 UTC by vasony ♦612 |
| 189604389 (Comments: 4) | UL-mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hier wat discussie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/niet-meer-bestaande-railways-mappen/122686 commented 2026-09-27 06:15:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 173922878 (Comments: 1) | akanouras (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have added that as multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21446373 - this group area could be removed, now. commented 2026-09-27 05:40:08 UTC by chris2map ♦59 |
| 188543083 (Comments: 2) | Antisida (Discussed changesets: 3) | This is a bug. It's the result of experiments during the development of josm-plugin. Thank you. I will delete it. commented 2026-09-27 05:12:14 UTC by Antisida ♦2 |
| 189597005 (Comments: 1) | jrreally (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome back to OSM! commented 2026-09-27 04:50:33 UTC by jmarchon ♦535 |
| 189517036 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, please try to use a smaller bounding box for your changes, and not have one changeset that spans most of the continent in the future :( (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets for the "why".) T... commented 2026-09-27 04:01:00 UTC by cswilson252 ♦28 |
| 189452242 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:54:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 178131267 (Comments: 1) | flanaganlaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:53:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189599406 (Comments: 1) | Bekudio (Discussed changesets: 9) | Drag-and-drop handle for building overlaps/nodes # six error messages ignored https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189612099 commented 2026-09-27 03:50:20 UTC by pitfire ♦758 |
| 118434326 (Comments: 1) | GpsGpsDelta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ai facut totul PRAF atunci cand ai editat pe aici .De unde dracu ai scos tu 90 la ora in localitati? commented 2026-09-27 03:47:51 UTC by rarad74 ♦577 |
| 189485176 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:47:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189403389 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:46:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189399457 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:44:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189364552 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-27 03:42:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189262111 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 03:38:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 138261863 (Comments: 1) | Anthony Karls (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-27 03:38:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 185828463 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | But, in case there is no railing, then `noexit=yes` cannot be used, and this changeset would be wrong. commented 2026-09-27 03:32:29 UTC by kingkingHK ♦438 |
| 189227822 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 10) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-27 03:26:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189611550 (Comments: 2) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611404 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611287 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611361 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611262 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611351 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611319 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611086 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611046 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611017 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611116 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611147 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611225 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611256 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189611095 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610789 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610836 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610898 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610869 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610599 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610620 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610745 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610563 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610583 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610426 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610488 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610503 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610402 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610545 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610383 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610234 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610266 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610387 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610143 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610204 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610210 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610156 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189609967 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610096 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189610014 (Comments: 1) | Dima Kishenko13 (Discussed changesets: 44) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189611794 commented 2026-09-27 03:25:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189597433 (Comments: 1) | Walter Frehner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of Googl... commented 2026-09-27 03:19:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189578837 (Comments: 2) | Omphalotus (Discussed changesets: 1) | (I added a check_date=* for you as well since you apparently verified its existence on the ground) commented 2026-09-27 03:15:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
 | 189246452 (Comments: 1) | Ahmad Abid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of Googl... commented 2026-09-27 02:56:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189197217 (Comments: 1) | RRGroßwallstadt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of Googl... commented 2026-09-27 02:55:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189142301 (Comments: 1) | NyctohasbeenTaken (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of Googl... commented 2026-09-27 02:54:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 188986686 (Comments: 1) | Eleve Restaurant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap sta... commented 2026-09-27 02:51:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189375723 (Comments: 1) | Murari Pokharel (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:43:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189375640 (Comments: 1) | Murari Pokharel (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:43:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189375535 (Comments: 1) | Murari Pokharel (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-27 02:43:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189605077 (Comments: 2) | Paul Fisher (Discussed changesets: 4) | whoops! I did not intend to have these be lumped into one edit. I will try to be more careful in the future commented 2026-09-27 02:41:18 UTC by Paul Fisher ♦4 |
| 189182471 (Comments: 1) | IsaacHBurner (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:37:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189182378 (Comments: 1) | IsaacHBurner (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:37:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189181991 (Comments: 1) | IsaacHBurner (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:36:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189383383 (Comments: 1) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:25:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189383310 (Comments: 1) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:24:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189331128 (Comments: 2) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 4) | Also an explicit source=* of Google Maps--they re-added it with such and I had to revert it again. commented 2026-09-27 02:24:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189382986 (Comments: 1) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-27 02:23:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189129514 (Comments: 1) | olhaleetvin (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you are an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the q... commented 2026-09-27 02:19:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
 | 189024569 (Comments: 2) | MansourAlotaibi (Discussed changesets: 4) | (Sorry, forgot to replace "XXX" with your name when adapting my standard message for this--it should read "Hi Mansour,") commented 2026-09-27 02:05:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 99891226 (Comments: 1) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 134) | Hello! You used railway=sto on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8452888451/history Have you maybe meant railway=stop ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some object... commented 2026-09-27 02:02:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 187611913 (Comments: 1) | Clarke22 (Discussed changesets: 67) | Hi! I see you've removed all the private tags from paths on the former Woodbury University campus. As part of the change to URLA from Woodbury, did they open the campus to the public? When I went there before the name change I was kicked off ... commented 2026-09-27 02:02:45 UTC by HeyRayReh ♦20 |
| 189573935 (Comments: 1) | IL91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why did you turn North Las Vegas Airport into grass? commented 2026-09-27 02:01:14 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦374 |
| 189011899 (Comments: 1) | Jerry the Map (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jerry, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of... commented 2026-09-27 01:56:42 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189251837 (Comments: 1) | SYDCONX (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-27 01:53:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189608812 (Comments: 1) | Sebas_22 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios. office=government me parece bien, podés agregar government=police si quisieras. La que no tiene sentido es la que pusiste en el nodo de la Defensa Civil, esa lleva... commented 2026-09-27 01:52:57 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 187316360 (Comments: 1) | Mroysterhead (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera was removed Sept 23, 2026 commented 2026-09-27 01:51:18 UTC by Vowels ♦1 |
| 189471886 (Comments: 2) | Osi200 (Discussed changesets: 1) | (The above applies to both this changeset and the others you've uploaded, which also have a source of Google Maps) commented 2026-09-27 01:36:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189592957 (Comments: 1) | Milona46 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Reverted this as the information seems incorrect. There is nothing here on all satellite imagery and the details could not be corroborated through a search as well as referring to a street that doesn't seem to exist. Apologies if I am mis... commented 2026-09-27 01:36:38 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189590649 (Comments: 1) | Franco De Luca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios. El etiquetado para mí está bien. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración tenemos un foro y un canal de telegram donde podés contactarte con la ... commented 2026-09-27 01:23:00 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
| 189590236 (Comments: 1) | tomatoflee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for contributing to the map! This kind of edit is really important. I've made some improvements including joining some buildings together that were touching, improving the geometry, aligning buildings a... commented 2026-09-27 01:13:16 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189558377 (Comments: 1) | VoltairX (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, en el censo de 2017 no aparecen datos para esta localidad. Favor de no inventar datos. Saludos. commented 2026-09-27 01:01:10 UTC by jptolosa ♦249 |
| 189436544 (Comments: 6) | Kodeks50 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Единственное, не ставьте снова name на водные полигоны. На линии ручья. commented 2026-09-27 00:33:26 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,765 |
| 189609226 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for this! I intend to do a real survey of the area around Muskegon Catholic at some point, but my JOSM skills are quite limited lol commented 2026-09-27 00:29:49 UTC by mitteneer ♦1 |
| 189608761 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Cusack (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, the buildings you are adding are expected to accurately represent the building footprints. You need to zoom in much closer and redraw these buildings to be adequate to this task. commented 2026-09-27 00:22:16 UTC by nevw ♦2,351 |
| X | 189608797 (Comments: 1) | John_Doe_Indiana (Discussed changesets: 6) | This edit has been reverted. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 commented 2026-09-26 23:47:53 UTC by Glassman ♦6,043 |
| 189608759 (Comments: 1) | John_Doe_Indiana (Discussed changesets: 6) | This edit has been reverted. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lake-ontario-lake-america/146975 for how lake ontario should be tagged. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189... commented 2026-09-26 23:45:04 UTC by Glassman ♦6,043 |
| 133561462 (Comments: 1) | Beat Kaeser (Discussed changesets: 13) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9543359960/history marker=marker ? is it really better tagging than pipeline=marker ? commented 2026-09-26 23:44:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189604700 (Comments: 1) | christina stadlbauer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Would you please be so kind and explain a little more what was wanted here? What you added here on the map was a "bird hide". Judging from the illustration in our documentation, this looks a bit u... commented 2026-09-26 23:40:48 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,087 |
| 186605982 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavimali (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287277741/history what you meant by natural=water water=no ? commented 2026-09-26 23:39:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 10125342 (Comments: 1) | geri-oc (Discussed changesets: 31) | I moved marker=sandstone to material=sandstone in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189608515 please let me know if that is mistaken in any way and should be reverted see say https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1287735973/history commented 2026-09-26 23:20:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 183909610 (Comments: 1) | Fullgas1 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zdar. Touto úpravou si rozbil reláciu https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16803497#map=18/48.422870/17.788821 a reláciu náučného chodníka. Opravíš si to po sebe? commented 2026-09-26 22:43:07 UTC by Tomas_J ♦426 |
| X | 189591155 (Comments: 1) | mbeyerle (Discussed changesets: 49) | this bounding box is ridiculous commented 2026-09-26 22:36:05 UTC by dmjab13 ♦151 |
| 189607053 (Comments: 1) | maemolol (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fixed the duplicate water for you :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607363 commented 2026-09-26 22:05:43 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦747 |
| 189602806 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189603107 (Comments: 2) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189602902 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189602747 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189597478 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189588434 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189602525 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189588764 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189587732 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189588101 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189587862 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189587954 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 189587640 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189607347 commented 2026-09-26 22:04:20 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,986 |
| 144058342 (Comments: 2) | jleedev (Discussed changesets: 25) | Almost certain that ` is an accident trying to press Tab to move fields. commented 2026-09-26 21:58:26 UTC by jleedev ♦306 |
| 179766222 (Comments: 2) | Pyknite (Discussed changesets: 8) | Fixed, thanks you commented 2026-09-26 21:56:44 UTC by Pyknite ♦7 |
| 175124307 (Comments: 2) | Jons Icoli (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, You're correct - or rather, I'm incorrect. I should have used est_height or height. The cart corral I had mapped was around 3ft tall, but I couldn't find a height function in EveryDoor and I couldn't remember the tag, s... commented 2026-09-26 21:54:34 UTC by Jons Icoli ♦5 |
| 189598613 (Comments: 1) | Plmilo08 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Do you realise that the changes that you have made now apply for everyone in the world? Have you discussed the changes with the community? commented 2026-09-26 21:51:30 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,269 |
| 187291986 (Comments: 4) | Godux (Discussed changesets: 1) | Not sure about the error i was trying to fix, it was two months ago. I suppose it was emphasized in red in Vespucci, but i am not sure why i decided to use "Protected area" instead of "protected_area". commented 2026-09-26 21:20:46 UTC by Godux ♦1 |
| 166587354 (Comments: 4) | DaveF (Discussed changesets: 181) | You, telling me my edits were incomplete, were "aggressive". commented 2026-09-26 21:14:22 UTC by DaveF ♦1,689 |
| 189603661 (Comments: 1) | roundjackal13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I accidentally created a duplicate. commented 2026-09-26 20:31:46 UTC by roundjackal13 ♦1 |
| 189596400 (Comments: 7) | elnappo (Discussed changesets: 14) | Es steht irgendwo auf der shop Seite IIRC. Ich bin aber auch kein Fan davon aus deinem genannten Grund. Ich wollte nur nicht einfach den Tag komplett entfernen. Mach das aber sehr gerne! Ich bin da ganz deiner Meinung. FYI: Es gibt 72 shops mit sport... commented 2026-09-26 20:29:15 UTC by elnappo ♦6 |
| 185026863 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 42) | not sure you were the one that touched it, but the correct for cycling/walking path on ibn gvirol is this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=sidewalk commented 2026-09-26 20:28:56 UTC by Dindia ♦64 |
| 169526420 (Comments: 1) | DHuthmann (Discussed changesets: 13) | What is this line for? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417611215 commented 2026-09-26 20:28:10 UTC by martin-kokos ♦48 |
| 189063909 (Comments: 4) | Hahaxghu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Zelf ben ik geen fan van apps als Organic en/of CoMaps. Vooral die adressen bewerken geeft steeds problemen. Goed dat je een terugkoppeling hebt gedaan naar de app ontwikkelaar. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-26 20:07:58 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189598432 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 90) | sí, el addr:street de toda la calle es Las Llanas zumarkalea. Que coincida con la vía. commented 2026-09-26 20:07:53 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦352 |
| 187522842 (Comments: 1) | sdwfe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, Bitte achte künftig bei Löschungen darauf, ob Relationen (hier: Radrouten und Pilgerwege) beteiligt sind. Diese Relationen wurden unterbrochen und mussten aufwändig wieder geflickt... commented 2026-09-26 20:04:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 189601954 (Comments: 1) | kevinparsonsjr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kev. Address info should not be on roads, but on buildings. Abbreviations should be expanded, South for S, Road for Road, etc. I've adjusted. commented 2026-09-26 19:58:56 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 184066507 (Comments: 1) | StinkerWiesenHautzen161 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sind die Namen dort tatsächlich gebräuchlich, oder wolltest du nur gerne ein paar Namen in der Karte sehen? commented 2026-09-26 19:57:36 UTC by Tatfahren ♦385 |
| 189363381 (Comments: 2) | ירח אפל (Discussed changesets: 12) | שים לב שאני סך הכל פיצלתי כיכר שכבר הייתה במפה ונוספה בעריכה https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1554565506/history/1 בהחלט לא מחקתי תיקון שלך, ואכן אני שם לב שאת... commented 2026-09-26 19:56:28 UTC by ירח אפל ♦8 |
| 189594176 (Comments: 2) | elGros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, gràcies, en prenc nota commented 2026-09-26 19:46:02 UTC by elGros ♦1 |
| 94593628 (Comments: 2) | miroslavuzice87 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hey Mateusz, it was a typo, I just changed it. Thank you! commented 2026-09-26 19:42:21 UTC by miroslavuzice87 ♦36 |
| 189401143 (Comments: 1) | SpeedBlade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Even BMX bikes not allowed? commented 2026-09-26 19:41:00 UTC by mbeyerle ♦53 |
| 189586626 (Comments: 2) | Toli99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Вибачаюсь. Буду ретельніше перевіряти. Дякую) commented 2026-09-26 19:38:16 UTC by Toli99 ♦4 |
| 188259675 (Comments: 1) | Yipper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yipper, welcome to OSM. I see you deleted the business, building and address node at 6 Coryell Street. Was the building demolished, or just the business gone. The address should still be there. Probably want to use the disued tag, see this item a... commented 2026-09-26 19:32:21 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 167782983 (Comments: 1) | BeheerHet (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Beheer.. Alleen een naam doet niets in osm. Ook de aard van een bedrijf toevoegen. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-09-26 19:24:01 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189283602 (Comments: 1) | Abdu88llah (Discussed changesets: 1) | شكرا جزيلا لكم على إضافاتكم المثرية والنافعة commented 2026-09-26 19:14:06 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦766 |
| 188570186 (Comments: 1) | saud102030 (Discussed changesets: 1) | أخي الكريم الخريطة عامة والأماكن الخاصة والشخصية لا يسمح بوجودها ونعتذر منكم لحذها commented 2026-09-26 19:05:01 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦766 |
| 188601617 (Comments: 2) | Lucas_semK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Opa Fábio! O problema que você apontou é da camada de visualização Openstreetmap Carto e está sendo abordado principalmente no repositório desse projeto (https://github.com/openstreetmap-carto/openstree... commented 2026-09-26 18:54:42 UTC by Lucas_semK ♦4 |
| 189601788 (Comments: 1) | Wereldkaart123 (Discussed changesets: 32) | https://www.ad.nl/amersfoort/na-52-jaar-sluit-het-eerste-italiaanse-restaurant-van-amersfoort-de-deuren-antonio-zegt-pizzaparadijs-o-sole-mio-vaarwel~aa2143e1/ commented 2026-09-26 18:51:28 UTC by Wereldkaart123 ♦32 |
| 133111096 (Comments: 3) | themd (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150064428 that should be simply par=3 without that extra sign, right? asking due to https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2964 commented 2026-09-26 18:46:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189557019 (Comments: 1) | Mariusz 2M (Discussed changesets: 50) | Po co dodajesz jednoelementowe relacje multipolygon? To jest błędna praktyka commented 2026-09-26 18:43:51 UTC by syntex ♦910 |
| 189447101 (Comments: 5) | Monchinho (Discussed changesets: 48) | >Puxen ese "da" en name:gl porque o artigo forma parte do topónimo, pero como non figura no cartel físico da rúa non toquei "name" Recorda que "name" debe ser igual que "name:gl".... commented 2026-09-26 18:36:49 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦376 |
| 164433895 (Comments: 1) | Samuell Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 18) | Não adicione linhas sem tags, relações sem nome ou geometrias genéricas no mapa. commented 2026-09-26 18:32:14 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,672 |
| 184112519 (Comments: 1) | Paderborner Schlüsseldienst (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, hier hab ich auch einiges gefixed. Hier war das Wohngebiet zu einem Gebäude umgetagged. Der POI mit dem Schlüsseldienst hab ich in den Gebäudeoutline verschoben. Flo commented 2026-09-26 18:18:00 UTC by flohoff ♦2,599 |
| 184112356 (Comments: 1) | Paderborner Schlüsseldienst (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, das hier ist glaube ich was schief gelaufen - mitten in dem Park ist kein schlüsseldienst Ich lösche den mal. commented 2026-09-26 18:13:30 UTC by flohoff ♦2,599 |
| 189586784 (Comments: 2) | BeheerHet (Discussed changesets: 4) | BGT https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?theme=BGT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=257206.90278405577&geometry.y=472146.80052004964&zoomlevel=13.13498349040294 commented 2026-09-26 18:12:29 UTC by 74523978 ♦111 |
| 159141295 (Comments: 2) | ausdread (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola! y además de esto, está mapeada como access=no, lo que hace que no se posible rutear por allí para ningún navegador. Si nos comentás un poco podemos colaborar a arreglarlas. Saludos! commented 2026-09-26 18:03:12 UTC by AndresDuhour ♦171 |
| 189581159 (Comments: 1) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 58) | Ook hier vraag ik me af: waarom deze wijziging? Vooral way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444707029 Het is gewoon een grasveld met wat bomen erop. Deze heb je zelf nota bene gemapt. Waarom zou dit een bos zijn? commented 2026-09-26 17:57:52 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦72 |
| 188497509 (Comments: 2) | wolfgang8741 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for catching this, yes it should be sports. I fixed and added the brand tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189599734 commented 2026-09-26 17:53:03 UTC by wolfgang8741 ♦48 |
| 189581587 (Comments: 3) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 58) | In Nederlandse steden vind je bijna geen groen wat niet onderhouden wordt. Dat het niet in een rechthoekige vorm is geknipt betekent niet dat het niet worden onderhouden. Daarnaast zegt de wiki: Shrubbery may also be planted and maintained by huma... commented 2026-09-26 17:44:08 UTC by Wanderer2000 ♦72 |
| 188070536 (Comments: 1) | Samuell Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 18) | O que seria "mapa do lic" citado como fonte? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188070536 commented 2026-09-26 17:43:24 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,672 |
| 185502077 (Comments: 3) | Rico557 (Discussed changesets: 65) | I'll keep that in mind. Thank you. commented 2026-09-26 17:37:48 UTC by Rico557 ♦145 |
| 189470802 (Comments: 2) | Jiri Podhorecky (Discussed changesets: 28) | ok, máš pravdu. Když jsem to zakresloval. skutečně jsem o tom přemýšel a vždy se snažím rozeznat zda pozemek vykazuje znaky školního pozemku. Tady mi to tak přišlo. To že tam je i &u... commented 2026-09-26 17:28:18 UTC by Jiri Podhorecky ♦21 |
| 189469598 (Comments: 2) | Jiri Podhorecky (Discussed changesets: 28) | ano. Tento objekt jsem shodou okolností jen upravoval tvar, nepřidával jsem tagy. Nevšiml jsem si co tam bylo zapsáno. commented 2026-09-26 17:24:49 UTC by Jiri Podhorecky ♦21 |
| 189429353 (Comments: 4) | lbilldt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yeah, eliminating the "rough-in" would be preferred. It's sets off all sort of Q/A alarms and causes me and others extra work. It's better to just leave your work unsubmitted until you have things polished. Thanks. I don�... commented 2026-09-26 17:22:26 UTC by b-jazz ♦954 |
| 189591358 (Comments: 1) | simon04 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Two photos of EV9 signs: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:EuroVelo_9_in_Croatia commented 2026-09-26 17:21:29 UTC by simon04 ♦47 |
| 189598246 (Comments: 1) | Natura (Discussed changesets: 38) | Huhu Natura, wärst du so nett und würdest den Änderungskommentar nur dann verwenden, wenn du tatsächlich die Relation an die Wegweisung anpasst ? Das ist so etwas verwirrend. Was genau änderst du eigentlich ? ... commented 2026-09-26 17:19:01 UTC by limes11 ♦1,112 |
| 189564890 (Comments: 1) | Charles Linus Brown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Charles Linus Brown, willkommen bei OSM und Glückwunsch zu deiner ersten Änderung. Dabei erscheint mir deine Änderung nur dann richtig, wenn entsprechende Strassenschilder den Beginn und Ende von "Riegerau" kennz... commented 2026-09-26 17:15:30 UTC by schoka ♦63 |
| 185064393 (Comments: 1) | mb64 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! I'm trying to gather as much information on suburbs/quarters of Maribor as I can so I can restructure them a bit (Košaki right now is on the same level as Center četrt, while it's a subarea of Ivan Cankar četrt). Is there a sou... commented 2026-09-26 17:13:28 UTC by Vladislav Grechannik ♦9 |
| 189598067 (Comments: 1) | Saulo De Tarso Guerra Wanderley Filho (Discussed changesets: 1) | Eu te amo commented 2026-09-26 17:04:52 UTC by Saulo De Tarso Guerra Wanderley Filho ♦1 |
| 183442103 (Comments: 1) | Peloria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5384366 commented 2026-09-26 16:42:51 UTC by qugeb ♦107 |
| 77384803 (Comments: 1) | marius851000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used crop=flower on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6996516367/history Have you maybe meant crop=flowers ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some object... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 63170684 (Comments: 1) | hirsy (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5952206970/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 35209861 (Comments: 1) | yeskela (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957151140/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:17:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
 | 57053913 (Comments: 1) | Borisy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5468858746/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:16:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 57273745 (Comments: 1) | (inativa)o fim (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5485134260/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:16:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 57713896 (Comments: 1) | (inativa)o fim (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! You used office=logistic on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5520459576/history Have you maybe meant office=logistics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-26 16:16:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 138847123 (Comments: 1) | KKK-jp (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792294505/history has building:levels = 0.9 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 16:16:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 166226960 (Comments: 1) | DeFra85 (Discussed changesets: 171) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382399003/history has building:levels = 0.9 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 16:15:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 187622133 (Comments: 1) | Causeistheffect (Discussed changesets: 1) | For tracking purposes only but not really for solving other types of crimes commented 2026-09-26 16:12:44 UTC by Causeistheffect ♦1 |
| 189595282 (Comments: 1) | MagicPocketbook462 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Just to mention that I'm not staunchly against a "West Barnham" being mapped! I do believe though it should be not tagged as a "suburb" and linked to Wikipedia if that is to happen though. It should be a smaller way/r... commented 2026-09-26 16:02:14 UTC by MagicPocketbook462 ♦19 |
| 30528832 (Comments: 1) | Laurent@ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91017929/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some d... commented 2026-09-26 15:47:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 160135205 (Comments: 1) | Mykhailo25 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341308684/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 15:47:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 165047911 (Comments: 1) | Slavisa1212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180758382/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 15:47:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 180106448 (Comments: 1) | Herr Bause (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526691497/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 15:47:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189589790 (Comments: 4) | burningmatt (Discussed changesets: 2) | No problem 😀 Veel plezier met mappen. eggie commented 2026-09-26 15:43:06 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 63036160 (Comments: 2) | BER319 (Discussed changesets: 40) | Oh, that was a long time ago, but you're right—it's a typo. The next person working on it didn't notice it either. I've corrected it. commented 2026-09-26 15:34:02 UTC by BER319 ♦116 |
| 189588701 (Comments: 1) | LionOfDelly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-26 15:29:31 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189302881 (Comments: 2) | Aapo 56th (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei. Huomiona että editorissa avautuva tausta "Helsinki region ortophoto" on melko vanha. Nyt esim. siirtämäsi rakennus (Monumentti) on virheellisessä sijainnissa. Lisäsit rakennuksen/rakennelman "raivoraitti ... commented 2026-09-26 15:28:35 UTC by joovan ♦1 |
| 188129289 (Comments: 2) | evdence (Discussed changesets: 86) | 👍 commented 2026-09-26 15:28:13 UTC by evdence ♦42 |
| 160825811 (Comments: 2) | Lužicki Bieluch (Discussed changesets: 39) | Jak coś to na spokojnie można wycofać, już wszystkie z tego changeseta przerzuciłem do OHMu commented 2026-09-26 15:18:30 UTC by Lužicki Bieluch ♦29 |
| 189554593 (Comments: 1) | Domi1504 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nie wprowadzamy adresu na poi w momencie gdy poi jest na budynku z adresem commented 2026-09-26 15:17:29 UTC by toster234 ♦23 |
| 189567632 (Comments: 3) | opensourceisbetter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it, Thanks for getting back to me. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, ... commented 2026-09-26 15:13:15 UTC by MassCartog ♦484 |
| 66131356 (Comments: 2) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Yes. I have fixed it. commented 2026-09-26 15:11:47 UTC by maxolasersquad ♦97 |
| 188039207 (Comments: 1) | joelmatos (Discussed changesets: 4) | joelmatos, please write you changesets description with more details. All changesets from you that I see are described only as "local updates". Every changeset is an update and it's nice if it's a local change so you should mentio... commented 2026-09-26 15:10:35 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦449 |
| 189525593 (Comments: 3) | moaxed (Discussed changesets: 15) | ok, lycka till! Bra att du delar upp det i mindre bitar också, jag vill inte att vi har en mega-heath (t.ex. så stort som Grönland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7662545) :D Finns kanske risk dock att någon f&oum... commented 2026-09-26 14:35:08 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦34 |
| 189573113 (Comments: 1) | Uyt555 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset you changed name:en from Turkey to T. I assume this may have been accidental, since your changeset comment refers to the 2022 naming change. T is not a valid English country name, so this edit shou... commented 2026-09-26 14:17:44 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
 | 189573291 (Comments: 1) | Uyt555 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. name:en in OSM is intended for the name used by English speakers, not necessarily the official diplomatic/UN name. "Ivory Coast" remains in current English usage, while the official English/UN form "Côt... commented 2026-09-26 14:16:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,031 |
| 189590448 (Comments: 1) | м1т (Discussed changesets: 36) | реестр https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Ftransport.lenobl.ru%2Fmedia%2Fuploads%2Fuserfiles%2F2026%2F09%2F11%2F%25D0%259F%25D0%25B5%25D1%2580%25D0%25B5%25D1%2587%25D0%25B5%25D0%25BD%25D1%258C_%25D1%2581%25D0%25BC%25... commented 2026-09-26 14:14:18 UTC by м1т ♦20 |
| 130378870 (Comments: 2) | voschix (Discussed changesets: 79) | Obviously a typo. I fixed a couple. I hope it's limited to a few instances. Overpass turbo seems to be overloaded - I'm having trouble to run any larger search. commented 2026-09-26 14:07:55 UTC by voschix ♦209 |
| 187573679 (Comments: 2) | OpenMapperZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yep, you are right. Sorry, i'm new here and i thought it was Elevation (that is 113m over there). Thanks for fixing it. commented 2026-09-26 14:07:38 UTC by OpenMapperZ ♦1 |
| 61153595 (Comments: 2) | DannyMcD (Discussed changesets: 95) | I've changed the tag to shop=tiles. I believe this was a typo. DannyMcD commented 2026-09-26 14:04:48 UTC by DannyMcD ♦105 |
| 97224889 (Comments: 2) | hofoen (Discussed changesets: 73) | I am referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8306848437 commented 2026-09-26 14:03:47 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,827 |
| 189585770 (Comments: 1) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 28) | Bring it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5540564 commented 2026-09-26 13:58:06 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189496918 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | I cannot offer an explanation or a recollection as to why that happened. Sorry for the mistake. commented 2026-09-26 13:48:44 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189580276 (Comments: 6) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 85) | Вероятно за w1562488221 ти е дало "warning". Ми за да е тунел, трябва да излезе от сградата. Виж как е. commented 2026-09-26 13:47:45 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 189546831 (Comments: 6) | TPF0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 我按了你的按钮吗？离开这里，如果没有疑难需要被解决的。 commented 2026-09-26 13:43:56 UTC by TPF0 ♦1 |
| 188968423 (Comments: 1) | zhgx (Discussed changesets: 1) | OSM에 기여해 주셔서 고맙습니다. OSM은 지도 지물을 매핑하는 곳으로 일반 페인트나 무늬 등은 매핑 대상이 아닙니다. 입간판 등은 가능하나 단순 페인팅된 것은 편집 대상이 아니므로 ... commented 2026-09-26 13:39:40 UTC by adreamy ♦66 |
| 125724208 (Comments: 2) | Hidoo00 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Yes, typo of course :) commented 2026-09-26 13:39:24 UTC by Hidoo00 ♦83 |
| 185268030 (Comments: 8) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | I see. The deletion was very likely a careless mistake; the changeset is quite large, could have accidentally missed something. commented 2026-09-26 13:29:39 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 189588301 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 653) | per https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137762884 commented 2026-09-26 13:27:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 183188368 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 63) | As confirmed by survey, the two ways on the MS lines you have changed electrifed=no is incorrect... wires remain on the line commented 2026-09-26 13:24:53 UTC by melbournefan ♦14 |
| 189541857 (Comments: 2) | PCK46 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Wpisywałem z jednego zrzutów ekranów jednej aplikacji, którą ktoś wrzucił na Skyscrapercity. Chyba błędnie, bo mogłem patrzeć do góry nogami na relacje i numerację przystanków. commented 2026-09-26 13:13:31 UTC by PCK46 ♦14 |
| 170456308 (Comments: 1) | FoeNyx (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13071571404/history - what bollard=FR:J1 means? commented 2026-09-26 13:09:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188903492 (Comments: 6) | Vazhii (Discussed changesets: 1) | autre vue ici https://www.cirkwi.com/fr/point-interet/5550608-jardins-de-l-eveche Horaires des Jardins de l'Évêché Ouverture À 7h30 en semaine. À 8h les samedis, dimanches et jours f&eacu... commented 2026-09-26 13:09:15 UTC by Vazhii ♦1 |
| 176999762 (Comments: 4) | Op'tRad (Discussed changesets: 65) | De binnenste lijnen zijn oorspronkelijke werk van E. Ik heb die vorm bij het toevoegen van de buitenste lijn ook wat verbeterd qua symmetrie - het oog wil ook wat. Wat joe voorstelt, zou kunnen maar is wel erg veel werk om allemaal weer te veranderen... commented 2026-09-26 13:07:05 UTC by Op'tRad ♦72 |
| 188667542 (Comments: 4) | scarapella (Discussed changesets: 25) | Likewise thank you for all the mapping and quality assurance you do. With a schema less system like OSM it is invaluable to have someone catching the outliers and making the data usable for data consumers. commented 2026-09-26 12:59:18 UTC by scarapella ♦65 |
| 6255762 (Comments: 1) | LEIF @ Langeland (Discussed changesets: 3) | Du har efterladt en "butik" her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/973789983/history#map=19/54.934914/10.712625&layers=N commented 2026-09-26 12:56:06 UTC by cyclist789 ♦135 |
| 15988304 (Comments: 1) | ClaudeMarani (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used waterway=waterpoint on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2292866924/history Have you maybe meant waterway=water_point ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-09-26 12:55:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 137627561 (Comments: 1) | Amin Fozdar (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182835409/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 12:51:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 150036192 (Comments: 1) | Pablo_BM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255246469/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 12:51:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
 | 174164834 (Comments: 1) | Manu Stefan (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447224991/history how you can have quarry of ceramic? commented 2026-09-26 12:33:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189534439 (Comments: 1) | euro_maps_2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM All GB railway stations are tagged as nodes. There's a bug in the rendering software which means platforms require the area tag. commented 2026-09-26 12:32:39 UTC by DaveF ♦1,689 |
| 189585536 (Comments: 1) | JeanSebastien (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ce changeset permet de réparer changeset/187035544 et d'autres. commented 2026-09-26 12:26:40 UTC by JeanSebastien ♦11 |
| 187035544 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 49) | J'ai corrigé avec changeset/189585536 Merci de contrôler les informations d'adresse et de position avant de modifier les noeuds. L'un des trois noeuds correspondant à la même marque était situ&ea... commented 2026-09-26 12:25:59 UTC by JeanSebastien ♦11 |
| 178976572 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1024) | Done. commented 2026-09-26 12:12:59 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 15784116 (Comments: 2) | Yod4z (Discussed changesets: 37) | Outch! 13 years ! Yes it's motocycle for cross motorcycle exactly I'll correct it commented 2026-09-26 12:04:08 UTC by Yod4z ♦30 |
| 172018795 (Comments: 2) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 166) | Thanks. Clearly it is typo which can be spotted by looking at mapillary tag on said object. Resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189584565 commented 2026-09-26 12:02:44 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦747 |
| 155635143 (Comments: 2) | Gobautista (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changed to building:levels=4 based on linked image (changeset/189584506). commented 2026-09-26 12:01:14 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦203 |
| 188343162 (Comments: 2) | Евгений Камчатка (Discussed changesets: 1) | Уже посмортел трек) commented 2026-09-26 11:59:17 UTC by ednzxt ♦18 |
| 171626131 (Comments: 2) | segi (Discussed changesets: 31) | áno porobil som viacero apseky s tým pridávaním povrchu vtedy. snažil som sa poopravovať čo som vedel ale tieto cesty III. triedy som opomenul. idem to opraviť commented 2026-09-26 11:51:49 UTC by segi ♦43 |
| 79578041 (Comments: 1) | wisi_ (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, le chateau ne serait-il pas plutôt la grosse demeure juste à côté dans l'ouest ? Vu du ciel le batiment que vous avez identifié "chateau" ressemble plus à un bâtiment agricol... commented 2026-09-26 11:36:14 UTC by zorglubu ♦364 |
| 171239576 (Comments: 3) | segi (Discussed changesets: 31) | pozriem to. je možné že to bolo omylom pred rokom som nastavoval viacerým cestám povrch. vďaka za kontrolu commented 2026-09-26 11:34:48 UTC by segi ♦43 |
| 145784386 (Comments: 1) | neoLithos (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! You used oneway:bicycle=no: on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92417346/history Have you maybe meant oneway:bicycle=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-09-26 11:33:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 161928391 (Comments: 1) | simon_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hello! You used oneway:bicycle=no$ on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23744594/history Have you maybe meant oneway:bicycle=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-09-26 11:33:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 171207770 (Comments: 1) | bob3bob3 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello! You used informal=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13108004956/history Have you maybe meant informal=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects... commented 2026-09-26 11:32:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188122816 (Comments: 1) | Bob3131 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used aerialway=chairlift on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2191614812/history Have you maybe meant aerialway=chair_lift ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I ed... commented 2026-09-26 11:32:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 36961577 (Comments: 1) | Grozav Nicolae (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223968741/history has building:levels = P+4 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-26 11:32:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 176017640 (Comments: 1) | Kerploonk (Discussed changesets: 19) | Eru gefnar út opnunartímar verslunarkjarnans? commented 2026-09-26 11:25:34 UTC by Morten Lange ♦58 |
| 189569084 (Comments: 1) | Brynnan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi -- is there a reason the house number was removed with this update? commented 2026-09-26 11:23:55 UTC by noahheffron ♦30 |
| 189580693 (Comments: 1) | PlaneEight (Discussed changesets: 1) | Source: Local knowledge forgot to add that commented 2026-09-26 10:57:10 UTC by PlaneEight ♦1 |
| 189573661 (Comments: 1) | Semolinajoe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You're quite right; it's not a PRoW, but it is a ground feature clearly visible on imagery and to all who may pass by. Therefore, I've reinstated it. I've amended the tags to access=agricultura... commented 2026-09-26 10:51:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,387 |
| 189580870 (Comments: 1) | Thewtgg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Üdv! A Kínai sárkány szobrot teljesen elbontották? https://www.kozterkep.hu/24110 commented 2026-09-26 10:49:16 UTC by qstep ♦264 |
| 189363766 (Comments: 3) | galacticism (Discussed changesets: 8) | Strange, QA flagged it as a highway/water crossing. Must have been stale data before your change. Sorry to have bothered. commented 2026-09-26 10:41:12 UTC by SekeRob ♦1,528 |
| 31252482 (Comments: 3) | HWST (Discussed changesets: 4) | edited in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345949660 (JOSM is not mandatory) commented 2026-09-26 10:39:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 117708462 (Comments: 3) | B_KSL (Discussed changesets: 133) | dzięki! commented 2026-09-26 10:37:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 182091978 (Comments: 1) | hombresigma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used barrier=y on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13785496617/history Have you maybe meant barrier=yes ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 10:36:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 185506793 (Comments: 2) | PluMGMK (Discussed changesets: 31) | Oops, muscle memory fail! Yes, it's a typo, I'll go fix it now! commented 2026-09-26 10:25:46 UTC by PluMGMK ♦27 |
| 182142628 (Comments: 1) | segi (Discussed changesets: 31) | Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1508012281 isn't tertiary, don't copy properties of neighbouring roads. Also please use more useful changeset descriptions, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . ... commented 2026-09-26 10:23:42 UTC by aceman444 ♦3,046 |
| 148018370 (Comments: 2) | TS-R (Discussed changesets: 12) | You are right. It was a typo. Now it is fixed. Thank you commented 2026-09-26 10:21:33 UTC by TS-R ♦12 |
| 185262373 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | There's no difference in terms of `=give_way` upstream of the X, and possibly processed for a non-existent give-way again between the X and `junction=roundabout` in upper-left. All this does is removing the gap that may suggest an island above ... commented 2026-09-26 10:14:41 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,054 |
| 118031773 (Comments: 2) | legofahrrad (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi Mateusz! The value was by mistake – it was intended to mean poster_box. I fixed the object. Thanks for the hint! commented 2026-09-26 10:10:52 UTC by legofahrrad ♦187 |
| 189547535 (Comments: 1) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 29) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-26 10:08:58 UTC by jayaddison ♦54 |
| 189294021 (Comments: 5) | aharvey (Discussed changesets: 96) | I've asked at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:charge:conditional#multiple_charges_selects_last_one commented 2026-09-26 09:50:03 UTC by aharvey ♦1,996 |
| 189376608 (Comments: 3) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 319) | Ok thanks for the explanation. I've restored to the opening_hours based on what my StreetComplete edit set. commented 2026-09-26 09:41:10 UTC by aharvey ♦1,996 |
| 188145032 (Comments: 1) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello dima :) Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contributions :) I’m one of the volunteers, and I'm writing to you because you have added "review requested" to your changeset https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-09-26 09:39:33 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦145 |
| 152309972 (Comments: 1) | eton-tech (Discussed changesets: 4) | hi. why did you add 3 address points here, two of which are totally duplicated? can you fix that? commented 2026-09-26 09:26:19 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦419 |
| 188170429 (Comments: 1) | Nikolas_K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Καλησπέρα Νικόλα, Καλώς ήρθες στο OpenStreetMap και να είσ&a... commented 2026-09-26 09:25:55 UTC by 0000FF berries ♦145 |
| 188037637 (Comments: 3) | Cerritus (Discussed changesets: 7) | a good thing that I have not tried "fixing" it then... And thanks even more for your mapping! commented 2026-09-26 09:03:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189269961 (Comments: 1) | Malisa Pecanica (Discussed changesets: 7) | please source your edits to confirm they are real. i am warning you for now, might report you to OSM staff if you do not comply within your next edits. Best regards commented 2026-09-26 08:47:43 UTC by 5mister7 ♦19 |
| 189092595 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 南沙-外港目前无运营 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:16 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189106598 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:12 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189115936 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:09 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189116391 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:06 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189136213 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:03 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189136306 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:47:00 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189144965 (Comments: 2) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将快速路标注为高速公路；无故删除语言标签；无故将地面道路与隧道合并 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:56 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189145073 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的将地面道路标注为隧道 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:52 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189146272 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 广深沿江高速并非沈海高速的组成部分；露天道路不应与隧道合并 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:49 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189147554 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 该路段并非沈海高速，不应将正确的出口编号改为G15里程数 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:46 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189190136 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 广深沿江高速并非沈海高速的组成部分 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:42 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189191219 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 无缘由的修改 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:39 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189235317 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 该路段并非沈海高速，不应将正确的出口编号改为G15里程数 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:35 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189235373 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 此段为沈海高速共线；修改不得随机化 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:33 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189235380 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 道路为桥梁结构，并非隧道 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:29 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189333982 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | 露天道路不应与隧道合并 changeset/189576519 commented 2026-09-26 08:46:26 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189569852 (Comments: 1) | CC_Simon (Discussed changesets: 219) | Really `=uncontrolled`? commented 2026-09-26 08:43:41 UTC by kingkingHK ♦438 |
| 189091924 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | changeset/189197451 commented 2026-09-26 08:41:13 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189117977 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | changeset/189298534 commented 2026-09-26 08:41:03 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189118654 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | changeset/189298764 commented 2026-09-26 08:40:58 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189190715 (Comments: 1) | TONY TSE (Discussed changesets: 24) | changeset/189321326 commented 2026-09-26 08:40:44 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦116 |
| 189444215 (Comments: 3) | wahoooo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry for my mistyping, I'll fix that right away. As "材塗膳厅" is hanged up at the main entrance, it may be a better practice to have "万人食堂" in alt_name. commented 2026-09-26 08:35:32 UTC by wahoooo ♦2 |
| 189575489 (Comments: 1) | Rundkeks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Die Schreibweise "opening_hours" sollte im BE Format erfolgen. Das Tool kann Helfen: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ commented 2026-09-26 08:35:03 UTC by pitfire ♦758 |
| 189574111 (Comments: 1) | Rivai Sigit (Discussed changesets: 10) | pertokoan pakainya building=retail, bukan building=commercial commented 2026-09-26 08:27:39 UTC by FajrAl ♦872 |
| 189575207 (Comments: 1) | Rundkeks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Rundkeks, vermutlich meintest Du einen Laden/Imbiss. Dann fehlt: DE:Tag:amenity=fast_food https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food#Wie_kartieren? VG pitfire commented 2026-09-26 08:21:19 UTC by pitfire ♦758 |
 | 188960427 (Comments: 2) | redleo85 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for noticing. It's fixed. commented 2026-09-26 08:10:39 UTC by redleo85 ♦1 |
| 174739097 (Comments: 1) | luke_unknown (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449255592/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 08:05:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 109155864 (Comments: 1) | Andrew_pnnl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970407449/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 08:05:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189573880 (Comments: 3) | OmleSpeedy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, it’s had that name for 9 years 😳 commented 2026-09-26 07:48:25 UTC by nevw ♦2,351 |
| 189539938 (Comments: 2) | tovdi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Вовчанське - застаріла (совкова) назва даного населеного пункту. commented 2026-09-26 07:47:47 UTC by tovdi ♦1 |
| 173140316 (Comments: 1) | martinusK (Discussed changesets: 15) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13208710220 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13208710226 (and the bollards in between) There are tags inside the bollard tag (bollard=removable_bollardbridge=trestle_highway=footway_layer=1). |
| 189571376 (Comments: 1) | uneven5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-26 07:46:13 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 182102052 (Comments: 2) | Anurag92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | well, these name=Roads are obviously not (I am removing them remotely) I think in this case mistake was quite obvious of putting descriptions into names commented 2026-09-26 07:45:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 182700961 (Comments: 1) | Marcus Salles (Discussed changesets: 33) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513995867/history - are you sure that crossing was rebuilt with such physically split carriageways? If yes, from where you have that info? commented 2026-09-26 07:37:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 182208826 (Comments: 1) | KlausG (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13795210534/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has so... commented 2026-09-26 07:34:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 134284562 (Comments: 1) | Diego_Franco (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used building=barrack on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158327648/history Have you maybe meant building=barracks ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-09-26 07:32:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 175768017 (Comments: 1) | Derek-Tavira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13367671670/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has so... commented 2026-09-26 07:31:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 69029545 (Comments: 1) | sdicke (Discussed changesets: 38) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6392690156 It is an old edit, but would bollard=230 be meant to be voltage=230? commented 2026-09-26 07:30:00 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 185924327 (Comments: 1) | Waldmax (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539953 ? commented 2026-09-26 07:26:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188642651 (Comments: 1) | GeoDave5280 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1556666985/history - that barrier is a typo, right? (or was, at least for that specific object - other may remain) commented 2026-09-26 07:25:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 184257064 (Comments: 1) | frickelhanse (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used outdoor_seating=nob on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13949047339/history Have you maybe meant outdoor_seating=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edi... commented 2026-09-26 07:24:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 162984548 (Comments: 2) | Lirum Larum (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Mateusz, thank you, you're absolutely right, I don't know why this mistake happened. I fixed it now. commented 2026-09-26 07:22:39 UTC by Lirum Larum ♦13 |
| 138237791 (Comments: 1) | MunichMapper99 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used crossing=traffic_signal on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454510209/history Have you maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it... commented 2026-09-26 07:14:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 138189806 (Comments: 1) | MunichMapper99 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used crossing=traffic_signal on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4704082/history Have you maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (... commented 2026-09-26 07:14:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 138189953 (Comments: 1) | MunichMapper99 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used crossing=traffic_signal on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610621661/history Have you maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it... commented 2026-09-26 07:14:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 174991515 (Comments: 1) | statelyelms (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! You used crossing=traffic_signal on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125836203/history Have you maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace i... commented 2026-09-26 07:13:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 96018226 (Comments: 1) | Giuseppe Masilli (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937172/history has building:levels = Terra that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-26 07:05:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 83758209 (Comments: 1) | Krennel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=san on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51964993/history Have you maybe meant surface=sand ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 07:04:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 177281999 (Comments: 1) | arewelostintheforest (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, it's not a good idea to glue footpaths to landuse areas (i.e. sharing nodes between the path and area). It makes it difficult to untangle the two features. Thanks commented 2026-09-26 07:01:20 UTC by Solaris07 ♦38 |
| 112894052 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 147) | Hello! You used surface=woo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620567083/history Have you maybe meant surface=wood ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 06:54:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 111764385 (Comments: 1) | Rublistoi (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used surface=woo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14867480/history Have you maybe meant surface=wood ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 06:53:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 153752807 (Comments: 1) | AnnDee4444 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used surface=pave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257945432/history Have you maybe meant surface=paved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-09-26 06:53:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 37175749 (Comments: 1) | Cristi Cristian (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397525631/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 06:52:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 152166715 (Comments: 1) | geowas (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! You used surface=set on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24014477/history Have you maybe meant surface=sett ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 06:49:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 89975955 (Comments: 1) | JuaFritz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used surface=set on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53171933/history Have you maybe meant surface=sett ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 06:49:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 150553965 (Comments: 1) | Eric Bie (Discussed changesets: 58) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677408720/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 06:48:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 131156394 (Comments: 1) | Danfost (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128295697/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 06:48:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 154719402 (Comments: 1) | 23rfsd25v1c81 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284735554/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 06:48:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189560777 (Comments: 1) | KayViv (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI: holes (the centerline) shouldn't be drawn with so many nodes. See the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole for more info. commented 2026-09-26 06:48:01 UTC by b-jazz ♦954 |
| 189564175 (Comments: 1) | Motolab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. Ik heb wat samengevoegd. MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-26 06:24:35 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189568564 (Comments: 1) | BMJ007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dairy farm commented 2026-09-26 06:12:51 UTC by BMJ007 ♦1 |
 | 182008783 (Comments: 1) | qstep (Discussed changesets: 29) | Cabo Verde commented 2026-09-26 06:05:33 UTC by Uyt555 ♦1 |
| 39973726 (Comments: 2) | Petr1868 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hi, It seems like in past was this field not used according to LPIS. We have only two mapping with "crop=no" and it is for "úhor" (fallow field) and "plocha s kontejnery" (added recently). https://github... commented 2026-09-26 06:04:40 UTC by Marián Kyral ♦87 |
| 189565496 (Comments: 2) | in2itivity (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! The main reason for this change is because I'm not really happy with almost all major and minor arterials in Metro Vancouver being classified as secondary, despite the fact that some are clearly larger than others. Clearly Marine Drive is... commented 2026-09-26 05:58:17 UTC by in2itivity ♦11 |
| 189571392 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | *Put the Water Street District node AT the main crossroads commented 2026-09-26 05:44:50 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦374 |
| 189563486 (Comments: 1) | Dats82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Du er velkommen til at ændre parken; men slet den ikke for at erstatte den med et beskyttet område. commented 2026-09-26 05:27:38 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,931 |
| 189557399 (Comments: 2) | toc-rox (Discussed changesets: 8) | Danke fürs Nacharbeiten. commented 2026-09-26 05:08:15 UTC by toc-rox ♦19 |
| 189333762 (Comments: 1) | Pavlusenko Artem (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. You have used highway classifications that do not match the real road state at all. Please read Wiki page for highway to avoid making mistakes in the future: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:highway commented 2026-09-26 05:07:28 UTC by fluffycupcakes ♦31 |
| 189477560 (Comments: 1) | HRZA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I see you put the bridge tag to a highway, but it should be splitted and assigned only to the portion where it really it a bridge. commented 2026-09-26 05:06:29 UTC by AngocA ♦245 |
| 189435555 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted unexplained suspicious changes by SEO spam account with deliberately nonsensical changeset description (random keystrokes) in changeset 189570258 commented 2026-09-26 04:22:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189435521 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted unexplained suspicious changes by SEO spam account with deliberately nonsensical changeset description (random keystrokes) in changeset 189570258 commented 2026-09-26 04:22:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189435455 (Comments: 1) | Hotel Riverside (Discussed changesets: 10) | Reverted unexplained suspicious changes by SEO spam account with deliberately nonsensical changeset description (random keystrokes) in changeset 189570258 commented 2026-09-26 04:22:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189488487 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-26 04:19:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189487219 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-26 04:17:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189195191 (Comments: 1) | AndreaSchmidtCo (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-26 04:15:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189559404 (Comments: 2) | rafaeldunga (Discussed changesets: 2) | e antes dela, a lei nº 6.747/2016 já havia dado o nome de Rua Doutor José Transfiguração Figueiredo (https://cmgv.gwlegis.com.br/legislacao/7776), ou seja, a via já tem nome há mais de 10 anos! commented 2026-09-26 04:04:44 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦30 |
| 189559387 (Comments: 1) | rafaeldunga (Discussed changesets: 2) | Prezado Rafael, A lei nº 7.197/2020 denominou como rua Jesus Farias, a atual Rua "C" do Bairro Parque Olímpico II (https://www.valadares.mg.gov.br/detalhe-da-legislacao/info/lei-ordinaria-7197-2020/8790) Está... commented 2026-09-26 03:55:49 UTC by Yuri Matias ♦30 |
| 184042104 (Comments: 2) | Designinfo photography (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-26 03:55:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189569709 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | Source: https://gis.dot.nv.gov/trina/ (OSM-Revert does not allow you to specify a source when reverting, so I have to provide it in a comment instead.) commented 2026-09-26 03:54:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦374 |
| 186156930 (Comments: 1) | Uniconnect Immigration Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-26 03:53:22 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 189427387 (Comments: 2) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 56) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date commented 2026-09-26 03:12:46 UTC by Frank Peng ♦237 |
| 189568531 (Comments: 1) | Collinrenk23! (Discussed changesets: 1) | The crossing of first christian church and the parking lot aisle is a covered entrance to the building commented 2026-09-26 02:26:28 UTC by Collinrenk23! ♦1 |
| 189568444 (Comments: 1) | Solaris07 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Didn't intend to upload this just yet. Comment: "Add more wetlands and water areas" commented 2026-09-26 02:18:38 UTC by Solaris07 ♦38 |
| 189318712 (Comments: 1) | Tsibu336 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for taking the time to contribute to the map. I've marked these good though they could definitely do with some improvement. When mapping buildings the goal is to map the footprint of the building, not t... commented 2026-09-26 01:49:18 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 61729605 (Comments: 1) | rjc3000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617506117/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 01:41:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 86878039 (Comments: 1) | wh_LT (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817551142/history aerialway=explosive ? what it is? it seems related to avalanche blasting - but how? Is there some aerialway setup there for that purpose? commented 2026-09-26 01:39:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 135078468 (Comments: 1) | graham980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817861194/history has building:flats = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to expres... commented 2026-09-26 01:36:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189335959 (Comments: 1) | Metris Party Wall Solutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map. I can't see any problems with the edits you've made but I do have a few small notes. A source wasn't listed for this changeset but I assume from your account name the sou... commented 2026-09-26 01:31:11 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189338833 (Comments: 2) | davidoclubb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Agree with @trigpoint if you want to add details about who operates this consider using the `operator=*` key and it's many subkeys. The wiki page for the `amenity=drinking_water` tag includes a list of tags it may be worth considering adding as ... commented 2026-09-26 01:21:10 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189339671 (Comments: 1) | Mattymooz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can't find any reason for a stop being here either, ty for the contribution! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189339671 commented 2026-09-26 01:17:21 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189553007 (Comments: 1) | m0ntyMaps (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, revisé el cambio. Gracias! commented 2026-09-26 01:17:14 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦150 |
 | 110646046 (Comments: 3) | CharliePlett (Discussed changesets: 25) | wait, maybe it was supposed to be "pin" ? and operator text copied itself onto it? commented 2026-09-26 01:02:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189565629 (Comments: 1) | Menchithecat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. I notice that Island County GIS doesn't show these streets. They have Twin Oaks Lane ending at the 1881 Twin Oaks Lane house. Could these be highway=service with a possible tag of ownership=private and no name tag? |
| 98454261 (Comments: 1) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11979000/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 98519259 (Comments: 1) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17604289/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 154238468 (Comments: 1) | Pfad-Finder (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! You used amenity=ba on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12066995947/history Have you maybe meant amenity=bar ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 183753521 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 144) | Don't know how that happened. Fixed commented 2026-09-26 00:15:20 UTC by Omnific ♦242 |
| 189553609 (Comments: 3) | tyler_expedia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Q858513 is described as a "district-island of the Bahamas" and links to useful Wikipedia pages. Q3339000 is described as "capital district of the Bahamas" and links to nothing but bot generated stubs. This edit mak... commented 2026-09-26 00:05:23 UTC by InsertUser ♦501 |
| 188037918 (Comments: 3) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 319) | That would have to be the worse tagging proposal I've ever seen. BTW if you read the proposal, these tags are supposed to be on a type=defaults relation not on the boundary relation. If you move the tags to these, then at least they won&#... commented 2026-09-25 23:51:38 UTC by TheSwavu ♦685 |
| 189566336 (Comments: 1) | Pedro Souza Costa Maps (Discussed changesets: 90) | Na Av. da independencia o limite de velocidade é 50 km/h commented 2026-09-25 23:48:53 UTC by Pedro Souza Costa Maps ♦96 |
| 145373006 (Comments: 2) | archie (Discussed changesets: 311) | Thank you; as you suspected it should correctly be the plural form. I corrected this mistake. commented 2026-09-25 23:41:04 UTC by archie ♦1,375 |
| 185212538 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 8) | can you explain this edit? commented 2026-09-25 23:37:16 UTC by Natfoot ♦133 |
| 189566107 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | The street addresses and ZIP codes came from OpenWeb. commented 2026-09-25 23:33:33 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦374 |
| 147163728 (Comments: 1) | Oversold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used advertising=sign3 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11593868185/history Have you maybe meant advertising=sign ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-09-25 23:11:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189280332 (Comments: 3) | circle61815971 (Discussed changesets: 6) | with id it may be further confused by kerb=no appearing as translated value in the main interface though feedback on how iD could handle it better (and other things) is welcome! you can open issue at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/... commented 2026-09-25 23:08:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189564226 (Comments: 2) | FDOT_Ryan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Happy to help. This area is very confusing to say the least. -Ryan commented 2026-09-25 23:06:39 UTC by FDOT_Ryan ♦7 |
| 4867281 (Comments: 1) | alv (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/945028/history that should be destination_sign - right? (I wanted to double-check my edit) commented 2026-09-25 23:02:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 31274458 (Comments: 1) | HWST (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! You used roof:shape=dom on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346157691/history Have you maybe meant roof:shape=dome ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some ob... commented 2026-09-25 23:01:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 1706453 (Comments: 3) | JumpStart International (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! You used dispensing=nob on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/432278230/history Have you maybe meant dispensing=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-25 22:59:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 183716872 (Comments: 1) | Danalieth73 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! You used network:type=node_networ on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1229199425/history Have you maybe meant network:type=node_network ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replac... commented 2026-09-25 22:58:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 167045933 (Comments: 2) | Susi69 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Map_HeRo, vielen Dank für die Hinweise. Grab Dörsch habe ich historic=grave geändert. Hexenverfolgung habe ich entsprechend bezeichnet und Quellen ergänzt. Die Bezeichnung Mühlgraben habe ich entfernt, der Wasser... commented 2026-09-25 22:47:43 UTC by Susi69 ♦2 |
| 189368154 (Comments: 7) | kmenard (Discussed changesets: 4) | seems to have been fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189564226 commented 2026-09-25 22:44:40 UTC by Udarian ♦949 |
| 142247894 (Comments: 1) | zfish118 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213692963/history has building:flats = 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E,1F,1G,H that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended t... commented 2026-09-25 22:33:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 169211688 (Comments: 1) | alexandra_07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160262958/history has building:levels = S+P+2E+Ma that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-25 22:29:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 181657980 (Comments: 1) | kzmrzzg (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! You used locked=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13751893169/history Have you maybe meant locked=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-25 22:26:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188019172 (Comments: 1) | circle61815971 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used kerb=non on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14124011930/history Have you maybe meant kerb=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where... commented 2026-09-25 22:25:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 173245368 (Comments: 1) | Mike Moresi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882625262/history has building:flats = 37-42 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to express addresse... commented 2026-09-25 22:25:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 178253345 (Comments: 1) | Relics (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used leaf_cycle=mixed;deciduous on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20188870/history Have you maybe meant leaf_cycle=mixed ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it ... commented 2026-09-25 22:23:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 138204690 (Comments: 2) | rivermont (Discussed changesets: 69) | A typo indeed! It has been fixed. Thanks commented 2026-09-25 22:22:18 UTC by rivermont ♦243 |
| 175550422 (Comments: 2) | Marc Mongenet (Discussed changesets: 25) | Fixed. commented 2026-09-25 22:19:03 UTC by Marc Mongenet ♦34 |
| 183979431 (Comments: 1) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 983) | Hello! You used tunnel=culver on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34107906/history Have you maybe meant tunnel=culvert ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-09-25 22:14:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189336644 (Comments: 2) | NikWd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like all of the problems with this changeset have been cleaned up by that partial revert. Thank you for contributing to the map and welcome to OSM! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2026-09-25 22:13:07 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189430445 (Comments: 1) | noone2301 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! In OpenStreetMap, we expand abbreviations, so we write "Street" instead of "St", "Northeast" instead of "NE", etc. This is because it's easier to automatically abbreviate names... commented 2026-09-25 22:07:56 UTC by pwbriggs ♦499 |
 | 189564388 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse_Revert (Discussed changesets: 1962) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 189482009. commented 2026-09-25 22:06:04 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 189482009 (Comments: 1) | HusleeOSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189564388 where the changeset comment is: Reverting childish vandalism commented 2026-09-25 22:06:04 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 189555539 (Comments: 3) | Da_Steff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Steff, Because your first edit ever was in the Netherlands. 😀 I have no cristall bowl for your next contribution. I 'm part of the Dutch community and we welcome new mappers. Enjoy mapping, eggie commented 2026-09-25 22:00:32 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189554109 (Comments: 1) | Draykill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the map! This is a very good start for mapping a waste centre and even having a named building on the map will help people to find the place. I've ended up making a few changes inclu... commented 2026-09-25 21:57:08 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189562908 (Comments: 1) | Karla Canales (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Por favor dibujar lo que ve en el satelite. Además, puede cuadrar las estructuras con la letra Q salu2 commented 2026-09-25 21:54:30 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189549161 (Comments: 1) | Nüsschen (Discussed changesets: 36) | Nice! Spielplatzmapping! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189549161 commented 2026-09-25 21:53:28 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,361 |
| 189560446 (Comments: 1) | okwithmydecay (Discussed changesets: 41) | I accidentally entered the wrong description for this edit, it should have been: "Align benches with imagery and add openbenches:id" commented 2026-09-25 21:53:14 UTC by okwithmydecay ♦43 |
| X | 189563981 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse_Revert (Discussed changesets: 1962) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 185407675, 185408117, 185412762, 185418961, 185419800, 185420280, 185420564, 185420700, 185420778, 185421139, 185421419, 185421834, 185430851, 185430989, 185434223, 185435161, 185435426, 185... commented 2026-09-25 21:47:31 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185407675 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:30 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185412762 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:29 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185421834 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:29 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185420700 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:29 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185420778 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:28 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185459608 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:28 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185434223 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:27 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185458633 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:27 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185435426 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:26 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185420280 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:26 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185420564 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:25 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185408117 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:25 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185435161 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:25 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185430851 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:24 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185421419 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:24 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185430989 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:23 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185421139 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:23 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 185419800 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:23 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
 | 185418961 (Comments: 1) | Quellalicheconosci (Discussed changesets: 19) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189563981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some joke data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000584708 commented 2026-09-25 21:47:22 UTC by SomeoneElse_Revert ♦75,001 |
| 173161686 (Comments: 6) | Cello_Bello (Discussed changesets: 3) | @Cello_Bello Hello, Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. As suggested above, please do join the discussion in the forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/10 . commented 2026-09-25 21:41:03 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,884 |
| 37324294 (Comments: 1) | Marcussacapuces91 - Cadastre (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250765330 what was meant by crop=protein ? protein is not a crop commented 2026-09-25 21:33:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 69586363 (Comments: 1) | rojitha (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686009730/history what crop=ofc means? commented 2026-09-25 21:31:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188695342 (Comments: 2) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 14) | That node fixed. I occasionally see "pole" used on busbar structures (placed by others) though they're really not on poles per se. commented 2026-09-25 21:30:00 UTC by Mr Matt K ♦7 |
| 189562696 (Comments: 1) | Anupa K (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverting this changeset, from what I can see on the Bing Aerial imagery here these buildings appear disconnected from one another so joining them like this is incorrect. The building that you moved also seemed correctly aligned using the OSMUK cadas... commented 2026-09-25 21:21:51 UTC by CanopyFalls ♦137 |
| 189419922 (Comments: 1) | togglefog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, das ist in dieser Form keine richtige Adresse. Würdest du das bitte korrigieren und den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5533861 schließen? Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-25 21:13:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 188781512 (Comments: 3) | Cello_Bello (Discussed changesets: 3) | See my question addressed to you in this post: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-this-qualify-as-a-path/147364/11 commented 2026-09-25 21:05:33 UTC by Glyphe ♦18 |
| 189354418 (Comments: 4) | MooiTassTee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, habe schon alles angepasst, kein Problem. Ob das in StreetComplete angepasst würde... Ist eben ein sehr exotisches Thema, auch international. Viele Grüße commented 2026-09-25 21:00:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 174759904 (Comments: 1) | Tomek | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 123) | Dalej w budowie? commented 2026-09-25 20:59:11 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦944 |
| 189417682 (Comments: 3) | OSM-FFL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, das hier sind die auf Straßen: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A3000%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Langenthal%22%5D%3B%0Away%5Bhighway%5D%28area%29%20-%3E%20.highways%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydra... commented 2026-09-25 20:57:51 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,651 |
| 189530687 (Comments: 7) | Coen Wagemakers (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dank voor de link eggie, ik zal deze bekijken. commented 2026-09-25 20:49:22 UTC by Coen Wagemakers ♦1 |
| 179603102 (Comments: 8) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 75) | "private", nicht schon wieder "destination" *facepalm2* (Wäre auch schön, wenn man Kommentare nachträglich bearbeiten könnte...) commented 2026-09-25 20:49:00 UTC by LingM ♦20 |
| 189562440 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 418) | Commentaar moest zijn weg doorgetrokken naar nieuw pand commented 2026-09-25 20:47:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189124341 (Comments: 4) | atticquilt (Discussed changesets: 9) | You too, wow! commented 2026-09-25 20:39:14 UTC by atticquilt ♦15 |
| 181569412 (Comments: 3) | Entbert (Discussed changesets: 12) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 165228747 (Comments: 3) | Zunyu (Discussed changesets: 2) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188097763 (Comments: 3) | -Utiashvili (Discussed changesets: 7) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 138211223 (Comments: 3) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 183) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 155243592 (Comments: 3) | dknelson9876 (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 178208514 (Comments: 3) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188051340 (Comments: 4) | ptaff (Discussed changesets: 6) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 187377458 (Comments: 3) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 207) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 178647548 (Comments: 3) | VLD319 (Discussed changesets: 15) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 168575788 (Comments: 3) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 156) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 178296828 (Comments: 3) | xrt (Discussed changesets: 66) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 173660291 (Comments: 3) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 28) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 28234252 (Comments: 3) | Linie29 (Discussed changesets: 92) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 179043354 (Comments: 5) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 88) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:36:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 180972436 (Comments: 3) | Jarek 🚲 (Discussed changesets: 128) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:36:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 185703497 (Comments: 3) | wolfgang8 (Discussed changesets: 24) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:36:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 173112786 (Comments: 3) | Map_HeRo (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. And thanks for your activity in general! commented 2026-09-25 20:36:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189554668 (Comments: 1) | Mityaboxer (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189562037 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 131) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189554668, 189555052, 189555071, 189557391, 189557466. commented 2026-09-25 20:31:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189555071 (Comments: 1) | Dimakishenko12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189557391 (Comments: 1) | MityastrongBoxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189555052 (Comments: 1) | Dimakishenko12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 189557466 (Comments: 1) | MityastrongBoxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,402 |
| 155936503 (Comments: 1) | NoelB (Discussed changesets: 42) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12144573779/history line_attachment=w ? What it is expressing? See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2x4K commented 2026-09-25 20:27:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 163023987 (Comments: 1) | Merkades Vito (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12623837953/history - is this very unusual use of line_attachment tag deliberate? maybe it was supposed to go into other tag? see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:line attachment commented 2026-09-25 20:26:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189553088 (Comments: 2) | arvan3844 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, danke für die Hinweise. Ich habe die Änderungen entsprechend der Vorschläge erneut geändert. Habe nicht auf die Eigenschaften geachtet. Der POI ist wieder da wo er hin gehört, das war in der Tat ein Versehen. commented 2026-09-25 20:06:13 UTC by arvan3844 ♦2 |
| 188607707 (Comments: 1) | Albert radley (Discussed changesets: 16) | This new road hasn’t been built yet but is due to be completed by Feb 2027 commented 2026-09-25 19:52:46 UTC by Joshua_Brighton ♦1 |
| 188388222 (Comments: 1) | rochirochi (Discussed changesets: 19) | Where this import was discussed? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines commented 2026-09-25 19:46:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189560136 (Comments: 1) | DennisW5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dennis, De info staat op de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-25 19:41:42 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189560100 (Comments: 2) | DennisW5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. commented 2026-09-25 19:41:03 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 182231551 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM9 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Здравствуйте, спасибо за комментарий, удалила некорректный адрес. commented 2026-09-25 19:36:32 UTC by Ozon OSM9 ♦8 |
| 189559987 (Comments: 1) | DennisW5 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-25 19:34:27 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189558928 (Comments: 1) | maruverse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-25 19:32:44 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189512121 (Comments: 1) | Skyeward (Discussed changesets: 1) | On the building you tagged as name=Saint Francis Hospital, I don't think this is correct. That's the name of the campus the building is on, but the building itself has multiple names for each tower. --- #REVIE... commented 2026-09-25 19:30:56 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 189558226 (Comments: 1) | jel5464 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-09-25 19:30:30 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 188274385 (Comments: 3) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for being so receptive! It's refreshing. I should say, I do like the work you're doing to add landuse and natural area on the map. Keep it up. commented 2026-09-25 19:30:00 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦47 |
| 189510778 (Comments: 1) | grphx (Discussed changesets: 2) | camera:type=destroyed would be invalid anyway (just remove the camera). Fixed would mean it doesn't turn. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189510778 |
| 179001694 (Comments: 1) | Flsh_mcqnn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! You used power=substatio on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13596183254/history Have you maybe meant power=substation ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited so... commented 2026-09-25 19:27:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 145414178 (Comments: 1) | fkg - world (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296798901/history has building:levels = 3 + Dachgeschoss that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... commented 2026-09-25 19:26:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189478700 (Comments: 2) | GabiRen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Habi Ich freue mich, dass tatsächlich jemand Änderungen kontrolliert - nur so werden die Karten wirklich brauchbar. Danke! Wenn du stärker einzoomst, siehst du, dass die erste Box an der Wand eines Gebäudes ist (We... commented 2026-09-25 19:25:33 UTC by GabiRen ♦1 |
| 189160885 (Comments: 1) | SamiraHeumaier (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, um was für einen Wanderweg handelt es sich denn? Ist der Weg ausgeschildert? Ich musste deine Einträge leider erstmal rückgängig machen, da wir Wanderwege in OpenStreetMap anders eintragen. Ist leider etwas komplizie... commented 2026-09-25 19:20:14 UTC by cuzi ♦193 |
| 189555864 (Comments: 1) | bullethimself (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edits in Bulgaria! Please use MAF Orthophoto for future edits. Bing (and most other global providers) are usually outdated and of lower quality. Happy mapping, Dimitar commented 2026-09-25 19:10:36 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,045 |
| 164451499 (Comments: 1) | TJ Clark (Discussed changesets: 2) | ALPR no longer present commented 2026-09-25 19:08:23 UTC by TJ Clark ♦2 |
| 181138601 (Comments: 3) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 38) | Das Konzept ist mir bekannt. Allerdings habe ich Zweifel, ob es hier bezüglich der Fußgängerampeln richtig umgesetzt ist. Hier ist ein Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13720471509 . Diese Fußgängerampel ist ansc... commented 2026-09-25 19:07:41 UTC by Biff ♦29 |
| 189507364 (Comments: 1) | Eliaz_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Que es C62G+9H? saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189507364 commented 2026-09-25 18:51:01 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,431 |
| 189509217 (Comments: 1) | SlimStorm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hoi, Lastig soms. Wanneer het niet duidelijk is dan is het een highway=path en dat routeert ook voor fietsers. Het ligt een beetje aan de bebording. Die paden met Houd rekening met elkaar hebben van oorsprong vaak toch een bord fietspad.... commented 2026-09-25 18:45:16 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 187516604 (Comments: 4) | JuanCarlos80 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Ab der Kreuzung zur Lemgoer Straße gilt das Verbot auf jeden Fall nicht mehr, also genau das was als primary B66 in OSM markiert ist. Von der Kreuzung Lemgoer Straße Richtung Selbeck gibt es auch kein Verbot. sieht man auch hier : http... commented 2026-09-25 18:39:56 UTC by removed_user ♦10 |
| 189513449 (Comments: 1) | Eliaz_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. No funcionan así los tags que manipuló. Seentiende lo que intentó hacer, pero va a tener que ser corregido entero. por favor consultar en el chat de la comunidad si acaso tiene dudas... --- |
| 189553040 (Comments: 1) | Cayenne17 (Discussed changesets: 6) | J'ai un petit bug/problème avec JOSM. ça a gardé le même changeset #189553040 et ça remplace par le dernier commentaire. commented 2026-09-25 18:29:00 UTC by Cayenne17 ♦50 |
| 189545500 (Comments: 1) | Timmetje (Discussed changesets: 1) | review_requested \tyes Dag Rim, Je kunt een extra tag toevoegen service=driveway MVG, eggie commented 2026-09-25 18:24:52 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189553957 (Comments: 3) | Karellw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Op de archimedus laan staan al toegangstags access:conditional\tprivate @ (Mo-Fr 00:00-06:00, 22:00-00:00; Sa, Su) commented 2026-09-25 18:20:20 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189554547 (Comments: 1) | mopl04n2c (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag mop... Die adressen zijn er gewoon al. Soms liggen ze op elkaar of is er een bedrijf op getagd. Ik heb het adres hersteld. FEBO heb ik samengevpegd met de bestaande adresnode. CoMaps android is geen ideale tool. MVG eggie commented 2026-09-25 18:18:12 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 186896803 (Comments: 2) | vanagaudi (Discussed changesets: 38) | Vielen Dank für diesen Hinweis. commented 2026-09-25 18:14:46 UTC by vanagaudi ♦48 |
| 189551535 (Comments: 1) | Hepos (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Hepos, sind die ganzen Zugangswege hier wirklich Betonflächen ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-09-25 18:10:17 UTC by Zrop ♦172 |
| 189550977 (Comments: 1) | Hepos (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Hepos, ist hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31149375 der linke Gehweg wirklich mittlerweile gepflastert ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-09-25 18:09:12 UTC by Zrop ♦172 |
| 189027393 (Comments: 1) | Levanter66 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Levanter66! Thanks for your edits to OSM! Can you describe why you deleted way/1553318210? It's often best to leave ways with `abandoned:highway` tags, so others don't re-add them. Learn more: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-09-25 18:07:00 UTC by uppermethow ♦4 |
| 189548366 (Comments: 3) | Lord_Gaav (Discussed changesets: 2) | Top! commented 2026-09-25 17:52:22 UTC by eggie ♦47,501 |
| 189553829 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:28 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189551244 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:21 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189556320 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:05 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189554973 (Comments: 1) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 113) | Nutze das Tiris Overlay ;-) commented 2026-09-25 17:30:41 UTC by M_Gaugg ♦50 |
| 189517469 (Comments: 3) | 5R-MFT (Discussed changesets: 113) | Danke dir, schöne Grüße commented 2026-09-25 17:29:59 UTC by M_Gaugg ♦50 |
| 148837910 (Comments: 1) | Plumf (Discussed changesets: 422) | Hello! You used parking:left=lan on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754322806/history Have you maybe meant parking:left=lane ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited som... commented 2026-09-25 17:26:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188482074 (Comments: 3) | Jack_expl0res (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the explanation! The best is to split the road into two parallel ones - one marked as ford, the other as bridge. Both can get their appropriate access tags, and the bridge can have a 'width' tag describing how wide it is. ... commented 2026-09-25 17:25:27 UTC by mueschel ♦7,385 |
| 146362209 (Comments: 1) | Oos1812 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091804387/history has building:levels = 0.75 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 17:25:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189530217 (Comments: 1) | cuisinella claira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Vous avez déplacé votre magasin sur le parking, je l'ai remis sur la bâtiment, mais proche de l'entrée pour garder l'idée de votre changement commented 2026-09-25 17:13:57 UTC by LySioS ♦160 |
| 170348524 (Comments: 2) | jemily1 (Discussed changesets: 43) | fixed commented 2026-09-25 17:13:26 UTC by jemily1 ♦66 |
| 189409236 (Comments: 6) | ONEMISSLE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wir können auch gerne meine Änderung Rückgängig machen lassen, wenn es da Unklarheiten gibt. Soweit ich weiß, kann ich das aber wegen der Vandalismus Sache nicht selbst machen. Kann mir da jemand sagen, wie das genau geht? commented 2026-09-25 17:10:13 UTC by ONEMISSLE ♦1 |
| 189136183 (Comments: 2) | stutterdirectly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Must've been by mistake, sorry commented 2026-09-25 17:09:00 UTC by stutterdirectly ♦1 |
| 142840546 (Comments: 2) | ansuta (Discussed changesets: 15) | You're right, changed. commented 2026-09-25 17:02:21 UTC by ansuta ♦14 |
| 189171338 (Comments: 1) | GeoSafe-Moshe_Import (Discussed changesets: 1) | These should be refs, not names, and probably also mapped as route relations as network=US:OK:Garvin --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189171338 commented 2026-09-25 17:01:47 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 155815079 (Comments: 2) | noncandeggiare (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes most definitely a typo! The building is basically a big roof with no side walls on top of a pool where people used to wash clothes by hand until 30 years a go. Thanks for noticing. commented 2026-09-25 17:01:24 UTC by noncandeggiare ♦1 |
| 189132823 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 11) | Looks like it is one-way but the opposite direction it was originally mapped. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189132823 commented 2026-09-25 16:57:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 189553939 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 481) | The name was added a couple of months ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153230909 by a new user in one of their only 3 changesets. I've walked quite a lot of this and in no cases can I think of any that "Beacons Way" is t... commented 2026-09-25 16:53:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,884 |
| 188319949 (Comments: 3) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes I see that, good point, go ahead and change it. commented 2026-09-25 16:52:38 UTC by Killian Bath ♦1 |
| 189088005 (Comments: 1) | ArgyleZombie (Discussed changesets: 16) | Pretty sure these are county road numbers, not names. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189088005 commented 2026-09-25 16:48:57 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 188676981 (Comments: 1) | skorasaurus (Discussed changesets: 20) | just to note, yes, it's odd that the lots size are inconsistent sizes, but that's what exists. commented 2026-09-25 16:47:30 UTC by skorasaurus ♦225 |
| 98729559 (Comments: 1) | nordnorge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used cuisine=sandwich;pastry;sou on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3050973645/history Have you maybe meant cuisine=sandwich;pastry;soup ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just ... commented 2026-09-25 16:45:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 154939822 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 447) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106121053/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-25 16:44:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 154884693 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 447) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640085989/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-25 16:44:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 154631661 (Comments: 1) | SekeRob (Discussed changesets: 447) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97825648/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-09-25 16:43:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 153668171 (Comments: 1) | PurpleLuckyCat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608499561/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-25 16:43:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 177242074 (Comments: 1) | Shahmi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467182532/history has building:levels = 0.75 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 16:42:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 64231295 (Comments: 1) | DHP11 MDS (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641577319/history has building:levels = 0.75 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 16:42:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189065213 (Comments: 1) | visitingangels (Discussed changesets: 5) | Opening hours applies to when the location is physically open, not when the website is. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189065213 commented 2026-09-25 16:37:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 181987223 (Comments: 1) | Hukeish2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Es macht wenig Sinn, bei einer Relation nur die Tags zu entfernen. Willst du damit sagen, die Abbiegebeschränkung existiert nicht mehr? commented 2026-09-25 16:34:02 UTC by Discostu36 ♦221 |
| 188988521 (Comments: 1) | HeadHunter7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This optometrist got added in a drainage ditch equally distant from multiple buildings. Could you position this at the correct spot, please? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2026-09-25 16:32:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 47553785 (Comments: 2) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | Well, that’s sat there for almost a decade with no one catching it… Yes, it is gravel. Not driving over graves! commented 2026-09-25 16:31:15 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 189496599 (Comments: 1) | ИраШ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему улица в адресе задания называется "Ветеранов улица"? Почему нельзя назвать "улиц... commented 2026-09-25 16:30:45 UTC by mavl ♦77,108 |
| 186786452 (Comments: 6) | James Liber (Discussed changesets: 12) | Boa tarde! Enviei a notificação sobre o radar em questão. A cidade possui alguns radares estáticos como esse e também possui diversos radares acoplados em semáforos (Exp.: Rua São Paulo com Rua Par... commented 2026-09-25 16:26:48 UTC by James Liber ♦5 |
| 189423771 (Comments: 4) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 54) | Thanks commented 2026-09-25 16:24:14 UTC by empty_child ♦406 |
| 188976562 (Comments: 2) | Taktaal (Discussed changesets: 42) | Das war glaube ich eine der Treppen wo jemand jede Stufe einzeln eingetragen hat und dann war das Tagging auch irgendwie falsch so dass ich das während der Korrektur kombiniert habe. commented 2026-09-25 16:19:09 UTC by Taktaal ♦64 |
| 175028429 (Comments: 1) | Umut Arda Ararat (Discussed changesets: 3) | 4511663 numaralı notta (https://osm.org/note/4511663) bu güzergâhta artık feribot seferlerinin yapılmadığı belirtiliyor. Siz yeni bir feribot eklediğiniz için (https://osm.org/way/1453097311/), sanırım bu not artık ge&cced... commented 2026-09-25 16:15:53 UTC by Hypsometric ♦75 |
 | 180298254 (Comments: 2) | Catjacket (Discussed changesets: 6) | I was there and saw the trees growing in between the ties, commented 2026-09-25 16:14:59 UTC by Catjacket ♦2 |
| 158804588 (Comments: 3) | Flight777 (Discussed changesets: 25) | whops, sorry commented 2026-09-25 16:09:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189499774 (Comments: 2) | Sander H (Discussed changesets: 95) | Het is vooralsnog een schatting van waar ze ongeveer zullen moeten komen. Kan niet heel veel anders zijn zonder de beide af/opritten voor en na de brug een jaren kwijt te zijn. Zal over een paar weken wel duidelijker worden en dan zal ik het wel bijw... commented 2026-09-25 16:08:18 UTC by Sander H ♦92 |
| 140999391 (Comments: 2) | Руслан Т (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi! =) Thanks for spotting this, my mistake, I used the wrong tag. Since this is a flat number range, it should be addr:flats=270-309. building:flats is meant for the building itself, as the total number of flats. I'll fix it. commented 2026-09-25 16:06:06 UTC by Руслан Т ♦58 |
| 189529555 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 124) | It has! I did announce on the forum a while back, but jump in, there's still plenty that needs fixing commented 2026-09-25 16:05:49 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦473 |
| 187663513 (Comments: 1) | ContraBand (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539025 ? commented 2026-09-25 16:04:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189246082 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 223) | If referring to node/1699888987 , then "generic taxi stand". Re wiki "undesignated taxi stand". commented 2026-09-25 16:03:09 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦222 |
| 144661193 (Comments: 1) | tx94 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539023 ? commented 2026-09-25 16:01:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 179244301 (Comments: 1) | Bzyzz (Discussed changesets: 3) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539020 ? commented 2026-09-25 16:00:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 144591116 (Comments: 1) | Jtapia92 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090844311/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-25 16:00:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 158722549 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 150) | Hello! You used royal_cypher=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12310638822/history Have you maybe meant royal_cypher=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2026-09-25 15:58:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189540108 (Comments: 2) | nordiq_jve (Discussed changesets: 5) | @osmviborg Jeg har forenklet lidt og lagt turn restrictions ind. Hvis du mener at det kræver mere forenkling er du velkommen:-) commented 2026-09-25 15:58:30 UTC by nordiq_jve ♦5 |
| 156191951 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 150) | Hello! You used royal_cypher=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12155608718/history Have you maybe meant royal_cypher=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2026-09-25 15:58:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 158027825 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 150) | Hello! You used royal_cypher=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12259640350/history Have you maybe meant royal_cypher=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2026-09-25 15:58:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 187791392 (Comments: 1) | adejot (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887555028/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 169280395 (Comments: 1) | byskov95 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416328940/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 157175819 (Comments: 1) | blaukorn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487086470/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 161940778 (Comments: 1) | OMME-OSM (Discussed changesets: 76) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/660921527/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 83164240 (Comments: 1) | complete_gth (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372579937/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 135251300 (Comments: 1) | Fousss (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087327056/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 15:56:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 166846725 (Comments: 1) | merylstreet (Discussed changesets: 21) | why the fix me etiquete? commented 2026-09-25 15:53:40 UTC by Mixch043 ♦1 |
| 179819586 (Comments: 13) | magsimoe_swe (Discussed changesets: 145) | Looks like the mapper is back adding these links, albeit manually and only additions on two shelters so far. It might be good to discuss if we want to have these website links. Given that the website is not official in any capacity and looks to in... commented 2026-09-25 15:40:19 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦34 |
| 170704298 (Comments: 2) | Tom Ameye (Discussed changesets: 118) | Ja dat was op basis van de officiële Natura 2000 webpagina over de Wolfsputten, een boscomplex dat deel uitmaakt van het gebied BE2400009. Het is inderdaad mogelijks een dubbel met relation/7709586. Dan komt de vraag op wat de basis is voor r... commented 2026-09-25 15:31:18 UTC by Tom Ameye ♦71 |
| 171637525 (Comments: 3) | de24000 (Discussed changesets: 4) | man_made=foundation may be used to mark such case and distinguish it from completely destroyed ones commented 2026-09-25 15:23:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 188698443 (Comments: 1) | FlockOffTulsa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Unlikely location (blocking sidewalk, please improve). --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188698443 commented 2026-09-25 15:20:51 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 189545499 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 191) | И за пореден път EveryDoor прикачва колчета/блокове(в случая) към път. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14214315774/ commented 2026-09-25 15:10:20 UTC by Fraxi ♦519 |
| 188599430 (Comments: 1) | ktr-osm (Discussed changesets: 3) | This building levitates? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188599430 commented 2026-09-25 15:00:34 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,590 |
| 189185333 (Comments: 2) | a_n_w (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think the end of Honeywell has re-opened, I'll have to check exactly what form. That said, I'm not convinced the south end of Brook Lane is open because that's now the boundary of Northern Roots so might be fenced. Needs scouting out... commented 2026-09-25 14:58:14 UTC by a_n_w ♦2 |
| 189492397 (Comments: 2) | Quinip (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, des de l'app de DeFlock, estàs obligat a fixar un "perfil" a l'hora de registrar una càmera de seguretat, les opcions que et permet són les següents: - Flock - Motorola - Genetec - Leon... commented 2026-09-25 14:44:15 UTC by Quinip ♦2 |
| 189495567 (Comments: 1) | qkaz (Discussed changesets: 25) | siehe https://osm.org/note/4708815 commented 2026-09-25 14:44:01 UTC by flo2154 ♦72 |
| 189537017 (Comments: 8) | RLlE (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks, I'll take another look at it tonight Rhys commented 2026-09-25 14:36:50 UTC by RLlE ♦4 |