| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 187548948 (Comments: 2) | matteobma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, ho fatto del mio meglio visto che mancava completamente. Se è possibile togli pure. Grazie. commented 2026-08-16 19:49:40 UTC by matteobma ♦1 |
 | 187552393 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 319) | Ahoj, zmeny v tomto changesete su dost protichodne: - ze sa "ZSR" a "ZSSK" zmenilo na uplne nazvy, to je pochopitelne, - ale ze sa "operator=Vseobecna uverova banka" zmenil na "VUB Banka" (co je len zn... commented 2026-08-16 19:49:19 UTC by t_ja ♦292 |
 | 187254352 (Comments: 1) | zyr@fa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, if street has no name, you can add "addr:place=Amieva" to the building and "noname=yes" to the street. Thanks for your edits. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... commented 2026-08-16 19:48:14 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦370 |
 | 187552921 (Comments: 4) | Ben Groothuis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oke, maar we mogen niet interpreteren. we taggen gewoon groundtruth of het onlogisch is of niet. We kennen wel maxspeed:advisory, maar zelfs is dat hier niet van toepassing. Hier nog even de sat foto van aug mbt de Prinsessestraat .. Da... commented 2026-08-16 19:45:08 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
 | 78436215 (Comments: 1) | malain 73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, le moulin n'est pas ici je crois :) Il est ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193151953 commented 2026-08-16 19:44:53 UTC by Antoowan ♦1 |
 | 185364867 (Comments: 3) | Drzewo29 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dodam że istnieje openrailwaymap.app (gdzie można włączyć wyświetlanie danych z OHM), nie trzeba dodawać wadliwych obiektów na osm.org commented 2026-08-16 19:43:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| X | 187512203 (Comments: 3) | Thomasje (Discussed changesets: 10) | Agree with the last sentence. Similar to continents and oceans, why is English the "default"? commented 2026-08-16 19:39:59 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦326 |
| 187549598 (Comments: 4) | Nimleth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi, Er liggen hier verschillende gebouwen door elkaar. Sommige als building:part en andere als building. Dat is echt gecompliceerd. Door die verschillende elementen krijg je dat 3D effect. Soms zijn foutmeldingen geen echte fouten, maar... commented 2026-08-16 19:34:26 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
 | 186684142 (Comments: 6) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 30) | Saluting your work https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/o7-slang (NB, Google is your friend :) commented 2026-08-16 19:34:19 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
 | 187487797 (Comments: 4) | balchen (Discussed changesets: 3) | I assume that government databases includes these virtual lines for the same reason they've been added to OSM -- no one has implemented automated generation, and it greatly helps in water flow routing and calculations. It seems that autom... commented 2026-08-16 19:30:10 UTC by balchen ♦30 |
 | 187495698 (Comments: 4) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 153) | Thanks - I've deleted the node now. commented 2026-08-16 19:30:06 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦337 |
 | 187486384 (Comments: 1) | nurdafur (Discussed changesets: 107) | Zur Info: die Änderungen an oneway=* wurden in changeset/187505949 wieder rückgängig gemacht. Auf Panoramax-Bildern sieht es auch danach aus, dass oneway=yes der richtige Tag ist: https://api.panoramax.xyz/en/index?s=fp;s2;peaa9f5ad-dc... commented 2026-08-16 19:29:22 UTC by kadiwa ♦117 |
 | 187369681 (Comments: 4) | rollercoasting (Discussed changesets: 4) | My understanding is that name=* and name:xx=* follow actual use by the language/locale population, not necessarily official use by the White House or other authorities. commented 2026-08-16 19:28:28 UTC by rollercoasting ♦3 |
 | 187538890 (Comments: 4) | rollercoasting (Discussed changesets: 4) | @JeroenHoek I understood when I replied to you earlier about this. commented 2026-08-16 19:19:38 UTC by rollercoasting ♦3 |
| 187552127 (Comments: 2) | jerome1665 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Op de Vincent van Goghweg het je de uitzondering op oneway=yes voor moped verwijderd. Waarom? oneway:moped=no Geldt dat daar allen voor fietsers? commented 2026-08-16 19:16:04 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 174822495 (Comments: 1) | TheOldGrouch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looked for this camera but was unable to find it commented 2026-08-16 19:11:00 UTC by 76MavStallion ♦1 |
| 187509018 (Comments: 1) | roro-t (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo roro-t, ich habe eine Nachfrage (du hast ja einen Review angefordert). Ist es so, dass das nur ein Dach ist und auf der Westseite keine Wand neben dem Weg way/1550015200 ist? Falls ja, dann wäre das kein Tunnel und hätte auch k... commented 2026-08-16 19:09:19 UTC by kadiwa ♦117 |
| 180646043 (Comments: 3) | gFido (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ale takie dane z LIDAR-u mogą pokazywać drogi czy ścieżki zarośnięte od dziesiątek lat. A inne obiekty (cieki, rowy, drogi, nasypy itp.) mogą mieć setki lat. Wrysowanie gęstej sieci ścieżek opierając się tylko i wyłącznie na tym nie j... commented 2026-08-16 19:08:04 UTC by VA00 ♦651 |
 | 186749950 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Най-вероятно входът( node/14065777810 ) е някъде около 42.6694573, 23.2838418 commented 2026-08-16 19:05:07 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
 | 187552260 (Comments: 1) | Jyllandsgade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Delete the parking, since there no designation, no clearly visible tracks or anything, just a few square meters of grass next to the road, it just happens to be in a convenient spot. commented 2026-08-16 19:03:19 UTC by Jyllandsgade ♦1 |
| 187549341 (Comments: 1) | serfuja (Discussed changesets: 2) | Asegúrate de revisar antes de añadir elementos para no crear duplicidades. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187549341 commented 2026-08-16 18:58:41 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦370 |
| 29600514 (Comments: 1) | MCDA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi MCDA, similar to the query on changeset 28555576... there seem to be two identical place names a short distance from each other, these are called Mass Hill: node 3407595837 and node 3407595838. commented 2026-08-16 18:53:29 UTC by LateNightTone ♦92 |
| 28555576 (Comments: 1) | MCDA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi MCDA, this ais a very old changeset I'm dredging up, but I notice at the time you created two places with the same details on this changeset. They're only a short distance from each other. Any idea which is the correct location? Node ... commented 2026-08-16 18:51:29 UTC by LateNightTone ♦92 |
 | 187535007 (Comments: 1) | Scheroam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich glaub du hast da was unabsichtlich geändert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139056269 commented 2026-08-16 18:43:46 UTC by Tris_1220 ♦28 |
 | 187016839 (Comments: 3) | AndrisMe (Discussed changesets: 2) | Es nezinu gluži kādu navigatoru tu izmanto, bet OSM datos `service=driveway` bez `highway=service` neko nenozīmē - tā ir kļūda. Ja tas ir kaut kāds neizbūvēts meža/lauku ceļš, kas pieved tikai laukiem/mežiem, tad tie gandrīz vien... commented 2026-08-16 18:41:25 UTC by HellMap ♦969 |
| 187549693 (Comments: 1) | SamuelvVelzen (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hoi, Waar het trottoir ontbreekt heb ik footway=separate getagd. Waar sidewalk right stond op een stukje heb ik segregated=yes getagd ipv no. Vaak wordt ook foot=use_sidepath nog getagd als er een apart ingetekend voetpad is. Ik doe ... commented 2026-08-16 18:38:44 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187399633 (Comments: 3) | zackrossdino2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | No probs but I am not sure which place you are referring to. I am sorry I wasn't more explicit in my initial message - I meant to refer to Newton Aycliffe, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9279708 . It doesn't exist as an administrat... commented 2026-08-16 18:36:56 UTC by Colin Smale ♦330 |
 | 187551016 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187551191 commented 2026-08-16 18:36:09 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
 | 185165046 (Comments: 2) | eliyahu bowers 𐤀𐤋𐤉𐤄𐤅 𐤁𐤅𐤅𐤓𐤎 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Not that I remember. I think it was just a normal parking lot like the one by the entrance but I did not go further in along that trail. commented 2026-08-16 18:35:12 UTC by eliyahu bowers 𐤀𐤋𐤉𐤄𐤅 𐤁𐤅𐤅𐤓𐤎 ♦8 |
| 187537994 (Comments: 1) | kakiremora (Discussed changesets: 26) | Może taki tag dodać do całej relacji BRA po nowemu? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6406321 commented 2026-08-16 18:31:05 UTC by kubzon7 ♦29 |
| 187548832 (Comments: 1) | posinstallatietechniek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-16 18:29:45 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187507760 (Comments: 2) | StC (Discussed changesets: 29) | Bonjour, je suis en train de démêler des polygones superposés avec des erreurs dans les rôles, ça me prend plusieurs heures par changeset, et ça me rendrait service de ne pas avoir à gérer ... commented 2026-08-16 18:28:28 UTC by StC ♦511 |
| 187549466 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 178) | Кадастрален №68134.206.120.1.80 - посочено е, че това е подземен гараж, но самата площ обхваща и начертаното... commented 2026-08-16 18:14:00 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
 | 187367335 (Comments: 1) | jjjjjaewon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187549281 commented 2026-08-16 18:00:58 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187548418 (Comments: 1) | Freedom Roads (Discussed changesets: 1) | this isn’t a Flock, its mounted on the light pole aiming north. An older style PIPS/Neology looks like commented 2026-08-16 17:56:21 UTC by Freedom Roads ♦1 |
 | 186002433 (Comments: 2) | Userinexile (Discussed changesets: 10) | 还有在上传前请检查复合多边形有没有问题 commented 2026-08-16 17:56:07 UTC by minusmajorityhh ♦13 |
 | 186629436 (Comments: 1) | K3YMAN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello @K3YMAN Thank you for contributing to OSM. I wanted to clarify on how to map schools to correct how you've mapped here. To add the school, add a point and tag it as amenity=school then map individual building as building=yes. Alt... commented 2026-08-16 17:53:49 UTC by Walter Mayeku ♦13 |
| 187502261 (Comments: 5) | SamuelvVelzen (Discussed changesets: 6) | oke zal ik even updaten commented 2026-08-16 17:52:36 UTC by SamuelvVelzen ♦4 |
| 187501223 (Comments: 8) | SamuelvVelzen (Discussed changesets: 6) | ah oke zal ik nog even fixen naar path met fietsen commented 2026-08-16 17:52:05 UTC by SamuelvVelzen ♦4 |
| 187547075 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187548472 commented 2026-08-16 17:42:31 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 81739491 (Comments: 3) | zstadler (Discussed changesets: 134) | Alright. I'm closing the note commented 2026-08-16 17:38:29 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 186972834 (Comments: 2) | FooBar99 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ah, Touché. There goes my perfect streak of no reverts... commented 2026-08-16 17:33:25 UTC by FooBar99 ♦4 |
| 187486119 (Comments: 2) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 178) | Е, вчера я видях. Ако са я махнали... Може би между двата отбелязани в момента входа. Трудно се откроява. commented 2026-08-16 17:29:06 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
 | 187547653 (Comments: 1) | GREEKROADRUNNER (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, I strongly advise you to use informative changeset comments, instead of just using a full stop. It will help us know what has changed without us having to use external tools. Thank you. commented 2026-08-16 17:26:31 UTC by ika-chan! ♦424 |
| 186034539 (Comments: 1) | skottmorris (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I noticed you also changed West Main Street to a private dirt road. I have undone that on my end because I believe it was a mistake. commented 2026-08-16 17:22:45 UTC by jm428 ♦53 |
| 187353115 (Comments: 4) | Fidelis Assis (Discussed changesets: 45) | This was not an import, but rather a manual update of the boundaries following acts of vandalism by the user GabiruX_ (who has been banned). Regarding administrative boundaries, I rely on official data, especially for areas where topographic surveyin... commented 2026-08-16 17:20:09 UTC by Fidelis Assis ♦54 |
| 184097963 (Comments: 5) | D Ave (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for taking another look. I understand your concern, especially from the perspective of running the street. I’ve previously edited this so that the named service road ends where the driveway begins, with the remainder still mapped as a pr... commented 2026-08-16 17:12:29 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦182 |
| 176264316 (Comments: 1) | Benoît C MdP (Discussed changesets: 32) | Bonjour @Benoît C MdP, es-tu sûr de la modification effectuée fin 2025 (mise en sens unique) et/ou sais-tu si il y a pu y avoir une modification de circulation depuis ? Raison : une note indique l'absence de sens unique, cf. h... commented 2026-08-16 17:04:58 UTC by Britzz ♦261 |
| X | 187423545 (Comments: 4) | rollercoasting (Discussed changesets: 4) | >https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/name%3Aja-Kana Thank you for this commented 2026-08-16 17:04:28 UTC by rollercoasting ♦3 |
| 187208176 (Comments: 1) | Weloxx (Discussed changesets: 1) | In France, LAPI systems are generally supplied by companies such as Axis, Hikvision, Dahua, Survision, etc., and not by Flock Safety. Flock Safety does not offer dome cameras. Personally, I would have defined it as follows: man_made=surveil... commented 2026-08-16 17:00:59 UTC by MojitoXanax ♦1 |
| 187531874 (Comments: 3) | addr2osm (Discussed changesets: 11) | And so we remove existing data that the operator kindly provided, in order to make finding these stations in the middle of Woop Woop a little more exciting? Is that a correct interpretation? commented 2026-08-16 16:52:08 UTC by Bzzz ♦4 |
| 187532542 (Comments: 6) | Winneke73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Goed om te weten. Ik zal straatkijk niet meer gebruiken als referentie. Ik heb altijd een dashcam meedraaien, ik kan die ook gebruiken. Super bedankt voor de feedback. Met vriendelijke groet, Winneke commented 2026-08-16 16:48:00 UTC by Winneke73 ♦1 |
| 187541512 (Comments: 1) | anion_19 (Discussed changesets: 2) | naucz się pls dokumentacji tracktype=* i opisuj swoje zestawy zmian, bo twoje zmiany są niezrozumiałem, nie budza zaufania, zwłaszcza, że nie orientujesz się co zmieniasz commented 2026-08-16 16:27:49 UTC by Yog Sot ♦536 |
 | 186071067 (Comments: 1) | Xeff (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Triglav is not T6, but is certainly more than T3, such as here for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39354887 Should definitely be at least T4. I changed it now. Please be more careful in the future, as such changes could be highl... commented 2026-08-16 16:26:20 UTC by mk2k22 ♦45 |
| 187189496 (Comments: 4) | pebepebe (Discussed changesets: 22) | Tak, sprawdziłem dzisiaj, Twoje poprawki są OK, ale trzeba przyznać że podniesienie dopuszczalnej prędkości na przejazd przez tory to mistrzostwo świata :) commented 2026-08-16 16:22:04 UTC by pebepebe ♦25 |
| 187537526 (Comments: 2) | map per (Discussed changesets: 98) | I usually only do that with shops where the rooms are likely to be re-used in the future. But if you think that this fuel station is also likely to open again using 'disused' makes sense. commented 2026-08-16 16:07:50 UTC by map per ♦1,337 |
 | 187542497 (Comments: 1) | DMarTrail42 (Discussed changesets: 2) | La riapertura dei sentieri trova conferma dal sito del Parco Naturale dei Monti Sibillini: https://www.sibillini.net/il_parco/gps/mappaSisma.jpg?v=1.0 commented 2026-08-16 15:57:34 UTC by DMarTrail42 ♦2 |
| 182660987 (Comments: 1) | Vieux crampon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Salut vieux crampon, en janvier j'avais trop simplifié https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465531478 il me semble intéressant de fusionner les deux voie et d'ajouter les tag dessus, ça permet d'affiner la navigat... commented 2026-08-16 15:51:29 UTC by Percherie ♦36 |
 | 187524822 (Comments: 1) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 97) | <3 commented 2026-08-16 15:44:44 UTC by sykul ♦91 |
| 187540185 (Comments: 1) | Turbo_max11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tip.. Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Ik heb de info samengevoegd. De format van openingstijden is twee letters voor de weekdagen.. geen drie. Groet, eggie commented 2026-08-16 15:30:40 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 168431745 (Comments: 2) | gukguk (Discussed changesets: 2) | Servus Martin, als wir letztes Jahr am 25.6.25 den Pfad begehen wollten, wurden wir vom Besitzer der Oberen Wildfeldalm ruppig darauf hingewiesen, dass der Weg zukünftig für Wanderer gesperrt sei. Von einer saisonalen Sperrung war nicht ... commented 2026-08-16 15:29:04 UTC by gukguk ♦2 |
| 180321216 (Comments: 2) | pigsonthewing (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Temporary_(conditional) ? commented 2026-08-16 15:27:56 UTC by pigsonthewing ♦11 |
| 187539621 (Comments: 1) | Turbo_max11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De priveparking op het terrein heb ik losgemaakt van de wegen. motor_vehicle=designated heb ik aangepast naar destin... commented 2026-08-16 15:27:54 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187541302 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187541435 commented 2026-08-16 15:24:13 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187541434 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187541435 commented 2026-08-16 15:24:08 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187540028 (Comments: 1) | slapperSam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi slapperSam, welcome to OSM These notes you're making seem to be personal notes - they are being uploaded to a database! Could you please check your app settings? Cofion Ceirios commented 2026-08-16 15:22:02 UTC by ceirios ♦137 |
| 187464637 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 26) | The single lane service road . Surface - asphalt all the way to the gate (see note #5459626). After the gate the surface is gravel. commented 2026-08-16 15:19:31 UTC by Heyklif Keeper ♦2 |
| 187364425 (Comments: 2) | GinaroZ (Discussed changesets: 60) | There were already some footway/path inconsistencies and I was also adding missing core path designations. So thought I'd try and be consistent with footway only for council adopted paths, because technically everything else is not just legally ... commented 2026-08-16 15:10:24 UTC by GinaroZ ♦1,315 |
| 187540560 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187540927 commented 2026-08-16 15:06:38 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
 | 127501222 (Comments: 1) | JotaBustaVi (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola. Le puso amenity=police a todos los edificios del recinto. Es como que hubiese 10 comisarías. lo corrijo. Saludos commented 2026-08-16 15:06:31 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187488615 (Comments: 5) | Daniël van den Berg (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi.. Je zou eens naar editor josm kunnen kijken. Daar schuif je met de rechtermuisknop en selecteer je links. Meestal zie je schade bij editor iD, maar Vespucci kan er kennelijk ook wat van. Mapse commented 2026-08-16 14:39:41 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 186454510 (Comments: 3) | Martybabes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah great, I've moved that into description then to make it clearer commented 2026-08-16 14:31:42 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦436 |
| 187532744 (Comments: 5) | Dennis_94 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hier het account van Marc https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/marczoutendijk commented 2026-08-16 14:29:31 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187538977 (Comments: 1) | jack walker2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | 简单地说 小区/公寓区可以在居民区要素写名字 但如果是村庄 则不要在居民区要素直接写名字 而是再加一个相关的标签 commented 2026-08-16 14:29:04 UTC by jack walker2 ♦15 |
 | 187313465 (Comments: 2) | ruuraashippu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Pengaturan bahasa aplikasinya bisa diubah kok jadi bahasa Indonesia. Nanti labelnya akan lebih mudah dicari. commented 2026-08-16 14:24:22 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187523474 (Comments: 1) | allwe231 (Discussed changesets: 9) | nama desa atau nama kampung? kalau desa, sudah ada Desa Sukamulya; kalau kampung, bisa pakai tag "kampung" (place=hamlet) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Pedoman_Penandaan_Indonesia commented 2026-08-16 14:20:55 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187535355 (Comments: 1) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sepertinya ini gang; bisa kamu ketik "gang" nanti akan ada label untuk gang. commented 2026-08-16 14:17:44 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187535818 (Comments: 1) | Julian Yandra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Untuk nama sudah bagus. Tips: Ketik "Gang" di pencariannya, nanti ada label yang tepat untuk gang. commented 2026-08-16 14:16:39 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 184767726 (Comments: 2) | wicking (Discussed changesets: 7) | ok, great idea. thank you. :-D commented 2026-08-16 14:05:35 UTC by wicking ♦4 |
| 173515937 (Comments: 4) | UserCurt (Discussed changesets: 3) | I have a mild preference for `amenity=parking` over `parking=street_side` as this is on a `highway=service` directly in front of buildings that are off the main public roadway, but this is not a strong preference. If you feel `parking=street_side` is... commented 2026-08-16 14:03:18 UTC by UserCurt ♦3 |
| 187202709 (Comments: 1) | chachaheels (Discussed changesets: 1) | There's no Lowes at this plaza and all of the Flockies for the Home Depot are at the HD's parking lot limits. Does this one really exist? commented 2026-08-16 14:00:25 UTC by Mr Matt K ♦6 |
| 186081136 (Comments: 1) | MarcosAurelio@1234 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, what does 'name_ciclo' mean? Does the cycleway have its own name? commented 2026-08-16 13:53:55 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 187532563 (Comments: 1) | Monkisins (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Monkisins.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode op het gebouw. MVG, eggie commented 2026-08-16 13:52:10 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187534238 (Comments: 1) | Marijnvdm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-16 13:45:55 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187299205 (Comments: 2) | gendy54 (Discussed changesets: 86) | J'ai un peu traîné avant de le faire ;) commented 2026-08-16 13:44:38 UTC by gendy54 ♦611 |
| 187527035 (Comments: 1) | Czaszyn (Discussed changesets: 84) | Nazwa „Matka Boska Miłosierna” była zgodna z opisem na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:historic=memorial Proponuję również przywrócić wikidata=Q140812741 i usunąć wikimedia_commons= commented 2026-08-16 13:40:58 UTC by ☆Finvenkulo ♦96 |
| 187532706 (Comments: 2) | Markoschka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revertiert und geändert in highway=track tracktype=grade4 und access=private hinzugefügt. Gruss eggie commented 2026-08-16 13:36:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187507818 (Comments: 2) | HarmHilvers (Discussed changesets: 10) | Dank. Ik heb het aangepast. commented 2026-08-16 13:29:11 UTC by HarmHilvers ♦10 |
 | 187298047 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 248) | Ben 100% op de hoogte. Maar daar niemand iets aan doet om dit correct aan te passen .... Ben begonnen en er waren er zoveel dat je automatisch uitwijkt naar een bepaalde richting. En na dagje klikken heb ik het ook gehad. Doe maar gerust verder . ... commented 2026-08-16 13:25:30 UTC by Jakka ♦1,873 |
| 186401845 (Comments: 3) | ramthelinefeed (Discussed changesets: 66) | Thanks. Yeah, that looks like one of the few bit of the A26 that looks like it isn't new-build. "Go up the A26, turn onto the C20 and it's the first field on the left" can mean 4 different locations. :D commented 2026-08-16 13:20:46 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 187443144 (Comments: 2) | puma515 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hallo Henri, Danke für dne hinweis ahbe den tippfehler bei allen von mir angepassten streuobstwiesne behoben. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187535306 Viele grüße puma515 commented 2026-08-16 13:16:40 UTC by puma515 ♦161 |
| 187353480 (Comments: 1) | PatrickEng (Discussed changesets: 2) | I saw that you were messing with the Water Taxi route in Ft Lauderdale. Did you know that the Water Taxi route is not owned/operated by Broward County? commented 2026-08-16 13:10:07 UTC by txemt ♦83 |
 | 187499342 (Comments: 1) | Sebastian Naranjo S (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Sorry to say, but many buildings are not aligned with the imagery Check this webpage. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549977908/history I invalidate this task. (74) Best regards commented 2026-08-16 13:09:11 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187534719 (Comments: 1) | MagicPocketbook462 (Discussed changesets: 5) | These buildings were updated as residential usage based on local knowledge and aerial imagery. If a building is tagged incorrectly after survey/evidence, please feel free to update. commented 2026-08-16 13:07:41 UTC by MagicPocketbook462 ♦12 |
| 186896002 (Comments: 1) | carciofo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Why are we readding Tiger info when Tiger info should be removed? commented 2026-08-16 13:05:43 UTC by txemt ♦83 |
 | 187527945 (Comments: 2) | Desert_Mouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | My thinking was that there is a long turning lane with a solid line. If the turning lane doesn't split off earlier than vehicles entering from service lanes may be routed to illegally cross the solid line to use the turning lanes. ... commented 2026-08-16 13:00:44 UTC by Desert_Mouse ♦1 |
| 149980503 (Comments: 3) | Road–Runner (Discussed changesets: 42) | Ja das war wahrscheinlich ein Fehler meinerseits. Die beiden Nodes ohne Namen können gelöscht werden. commented 2026-08-16 12:59:31 UTC by Road–Runner ♦222 |
 | 187466933 (Comments: 3) | naisha khan (Discussed changesets: 1) | guys i think this isnt vancouver commented 2026-08-16 12:57:38 UTC by finn-hound ♦33 |
 | 185214485 (Comments: 5) | Vojtěch Fošnár (Discussed changesets: 10) | People from the Czech community know about this import (talk-cz and Matrix bridge) and there was no problem with it. So what should I do differently at this point? I'm not a native speaker, so I hope my answer doesn't sound rude. commented 2026-08-16 12:54:29 UTC by Dvorný ♦42 |
| 187132149 (Comments: 1) | EnderX (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello EnderX, I'm trying to figure out whether this fuel stations still exists. Would be great if you could comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5456886 commented 2026-08-16 12:53:40 UTC by map per ♦1,337 |
| 187534046 (Comments: 1) | P_kawa (Discussed changesets: 25) | czy też nawet w Helu commented 2026-08-16 12:52:59 UTC by P_kawa ♦27 |
| 187364924 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187534021 commented 2026-08-16 12:52:08 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187496291 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187533716 commented 2026-08-16 12:45:41 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187512297 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido parcialmente com changeset/187533567 commented 2026-08-16 12:42:45 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187529407 (Comments: 3) | Nimleth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke.. up to you om het aan te passen.. 😀 commented 2026-08-16 12:39:17 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187478294 (Comments: 2) | Vinzenz Mai (Discussed changesets: 21) | Das passiert mir gerne, dass ich das falsche rauslösche, hier den Samstag statt zweimal "Uhr". Danke für Deinen Hinweis. commented 2026-08-16 12:39:16 UTC by Vinzenz Mai ♦45 |
| 187499554 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187533425 commented 2026-08-16 12:39:09 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187500489 (Comments: 2) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187533373 commented 2026-08-16 12:38:06 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 65218312 (Comments: 1) | highbuilder (Discussed changesets: 16) | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6120031583 a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6511273077 or an actual cave? commented 2026-08-16 12:37:10 UTC by 9_tab ♦111 |
| 187501407 (Comments: 1) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187533318 commented 2026-08-16 12:36:53 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 186069389 (Comments: 1) | Vinicius Fragoso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this train station got a strange "sponson=Claro" tag - could you chack that? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4143521761 commented 2026-08-16 12:33:14 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
 | 187343671 (Comments: 1) | soyandaluz (Discussed changesets: 29) | Este edificio fue demolido. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311473353#map=18/36.156354/-5.349305&layers=N commented 2026-08-16 12:27:29 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦364 |
| 187514880 (Comments: 1) | Jalv_cl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Es un convenience. a lo mas un supermercado. el concepto de marketplace es otra cosa en OSM. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187514880 commented 2026-08-16 12:22:21 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
 | 187518774 (Comments: 1) | salmSALM (Discussed changesets: 12) | نرجو عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية على الخريطة commented 2026-08-16 12:18:24 UTC by Alshowaiey ♦31 |
| 187252471 (Comments: 4) | minusmajorityhh (Discussed changesets: 4) | 我已经说了一是因为更直观,二是pedestrian的Wiki页面最后不也写了Instead, most routing engines go around the edge of the area, which at least ensures connectivity even if the geometry, time estimate, and guidance instructions are m... commented 2026-08-16 12:18:22 UTC by minusmajorityhh ♦13 |
 | 187514250 (Comments: 1) | IXAR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, el multipolígono al que le cambió las etiquetas es el cuerpo de agua del río Paraguay: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12274762 Reetiqueté el mismo como tal. Si necesita ayuda para seleccionar el objeto ... commented 2026-08-16 12:00:24 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦65 |
| 187522725 (Comments: 3) | Cart1082 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Der Änderungssatz ist geschlossen und kann nicht mehr geändert werden. Die fixme-Nodes kann man aber natürlich einfach wieder löschen, wenn die Hinweise angelegt wurden. commented 2026-08-16 11:57:45 UTC by Andre68 ♦90 |
| 186089212 (Comments: 1) | Holic_Kuro (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, what is this area? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442758983 "well_site" seems a bit strange - maybe access to underground tanks? commented 2026-08-16 11:57:25 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
 | 187433490 (Comments: 1) | Elishamaelbaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | בבקשה לסמן בור מים בתור בור מים ולא אטרקציה commented 2026-08-16 11:56:20 UTC by hatul ♦504 |
| 181163580 (Comments: 2) | jopasso1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Disculpa, lapsus digitus. L'adreça del municipi és 03726. commented 2026-08-16 11:43:23 UTC by jopasso1 ♦1 |
| 187529408 (Comments: 1) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 18) | I don’t think those signs should carry a ‘name`. The relevant name is on ways, no? commented 2026-08-16 11:40:24 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 184979882 (Comments: 3) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 24) | > Note that highway=* distinguishes roads by function and importance rather by their physical characteristic and legal classification. Well highway=motorway is the exception from this rule. At the moment the tagging is quite inconsis... commented 2026-08-16 11:30:14 UTC by map per ♦1,337 |
| 187379202 (Comments: 2) | whitepanda (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi, Ceirios. Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and get back to you.” commented 2026-08-16 11:27:11 UTC by whitepanda ♦41 |
| 187528081 (Comments: 1) | RemcoDidam (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Wanneer het niet toegankelijk is (Verboden Toegang) dan is access=no voldoende. horse en bicycle=no hoeft dan n... commented 2026-08-16 11:20:32 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 163165548 (Comments: 1) | Cybereric (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bonjour Cybereric, Je vois que vous avez ajouté une hauteur de 83m pour la tour du beffroi de Chalon, mais dans tous les documents que je trouve sur le net, il est plutôt mentionné une hauteur de 26m. Auriez-vous accè... commented 2026-08-16 11:19:34 UTC by Le Petit Léo ♦27 |
| 187527477 (Comments: 1) | Jemmme (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-16 11:18:38 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 186893163 (Comments: 3) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:13:50 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| X | 186931072 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:12:29 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938223 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:12:24 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938346 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:12:19 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938417 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:12:06 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938446 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:12:00 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938469 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:56 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938523 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:49 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938899 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:44 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938932 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:39 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938949 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:35 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938958 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:30 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186938987 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:25 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186939013 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:21 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186939034 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:15 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186939046 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:11:08 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186939053 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:10:59 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186939347 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:10:43 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 187128735 (Comments: 2) | UW Maddie (Discussed changesets: 42) | Yes, it should. For the first question: it meets the criteria for a sidewalk, which does not discriminate between paths adjacent to or between roads. The wiki also indicates that on dual-carriageway roads, the :left, :right, and :both tags are used o... commented 2026-08-16 11:10:20 UTC by UW Maddie ♦34 |
| 186939356 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:09:23 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186939518 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:09:06 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 187005315 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:08:51 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186929296 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:08:18 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186928314 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:08:07 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186927728 (Comments: 1) | NotanAI (Discussed changesets: 24) | Por favor, indique qué fuente de datos está usando para estos conjuntos de cambios cambios y bajo que licencia están publicados esos datos. commented 2026-08-16 11:07:53 UTC by dcapillae ♦450 |
| 186597320 (Comments: 2) | mcbax (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo rik! Weil er zwar schon seit 2017 hier registriert ist, sich jetzt aber erst an erste Bearbeitungen heran wagt... 😉 Die vergebenen Lifecycle Werte finde ich aber nicht verkehrt. Ich hatte noch "disused:landuse=military" dr... commented 2026-08-16 11:05:07 UTC by BrummsLee ♦65 |
| 187493251 (Comments: 1) | Tschars (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Hier in diesem Changeset wurde eine große Anzahl von Wegen gelöscht und begründet mit "Nicht öffentliche Wege". Ist die folgende Webseite bekannt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2026-08-16 11:03:41 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187490581 (Comments: 1) | Tschars (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Hier in diesem Changeset wurde eine große Anzahl von Wegen gelöscht und begründet mit "Nicht öffentliche Wege". Ist die folgende Webseite bekannt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2026-08-16 11:03:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187491411 (Comments: 1) | Tschars (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Hier in diesem Changeset wurde eine große Anzahl von Wegen gelöscht und begründet mit "Nicht öffentliche Wege". Ist die folgende Webseite bekannt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2026-08-16 11:02:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187490263 (Comments: 1) | Tschars (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Hier in diesem Changeset wurde eine große Anzahl von Wegen gelöscht und begründet mit "Nicht öffentliche Wege". Ist die folgende Webseite bekannt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2026-08-16 11:02:19 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187488630 (Comments: 1) | Tschars (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Hier in diesem Changeset wurde eine große Anzahl von Wegen gelöscht und begründet mit "Nicht öffentliche Wege". Ist die folgende Webseite bekannt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2026-08-16 11:01:54 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187509434 (Comments: 1) | Jean-Pierre Gagné (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour! Il y a une pancarte de part et d'autre qui dit le contraire. A-t-elle été retirée récemment? commented 2026-08-16 11:01:26 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦525 |
 | 187433875 (Comments: 2) | smithandjosh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oops, silly mistake. Thanks for pointing this out, I'll fix it when I get a chance. commented 2026-08-16 10:56:02 UTC by smithandjosh ♦3 |
| 187506745 (Comments: 1) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi Herwescheluc, der Innenhof wird auf der Karte noch nicht richtig dargestellt, oder? Könnte das am Tag man_made=courtyard liegen? Beim Pflegeheim z.B. sieht es richtig aus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1575473... commented 2026-08-16 10:52:54 UTC by GeoMH ♦5 |
| 187513563 (Comments: 1) | SbGagne (Discussed changesets: 15) | Bonjour! Privilégier bicycle=dismount à moins qu'il y ait une pancarte qui indique clairement interdit aux vélo, même en marchant. Merci et bonne journée! commented 2026-08-16 10:49:56 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦525 |
| 187366287 (Comments: 1) | jjjjjaewon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187528478 commented 2026-08-16 10:49:06 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187480262 (Comments: 1) | BlueGiraffe256 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hiya, I’ve had to undo your edit (as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187527705) because regardless of whether it’s visible on the ground this is the line of a public footpath (present on the local authority’s Definitive Map)... commented 2026-08-16 10:31:26 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,097 |
| 187524893 (Comments: 1) | RegribGamer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Regrib, De adresnode heb ik weer hersteld. Dat zal er vast nog wel zijn. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-16 10:24:23 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187522775 (Comments: 1) | axlr99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this area was earlier picked up by osmi as the multipolygons are not constructed validly. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.10352&lat=-35.23522&zoom=19 You may have added a few more since. mp outers cannot t... commented 2026-08-16 10:23:08 UTC by nevw ♦2,299 |
| 187525521 (Comments: 1) | Monkisins (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Monkisins, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-16 10:21:52 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187520532 (Comments: 1) | Monkisins (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-16 10:20:31 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187388940 (Comments: 1) | Tomás Ortega Fernández-Arroyo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187527077 commented 2026-08-16 10:18:03 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187387977 (Comments: 1) | john65350 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187526767 commented 2026-08-16 10:09:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 183980972 (Comments: 3) | 19wintersp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Patrick, Wow that is a strange one with the dual purpose taxiway and apron. Shows how ineffective Search engines are now, i tried all sorts of combinations to search for info, and the latest i could find was April 26! Than... commented 2026-08-16 09:56:51 UTC by 0235 ♦48 |
 | 187207672 (Comments: 2) | TechAssistGlobal (Discussed changesets: 1) | By the way, you used name:en=ADONIS MEN'S BARBERSHOP. What is the source of that name? They call themselves Adonis Men's Barber on their own website. What is the source of all these names? commented 2026-08-16 09:55:22 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦782 |
| 187037439 (Comments: 2) | Francesco Zanaboni (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ciao, grazie per l'info! Mi era sfuggita. Ho aggiunto un paio di dettagli allora. Buona giornata commented 2026-08-16 09:48:01 UTC by Francesco Zanaboni ♦36 |
| 152826426 (Comments: 2) | green_leek (Discussed changesets: 44) | The changeset was 2 years ago and I am not sure how it was divded, merge back to one now. commented 2026-08-16 09:47:19 UTC by green_leek ♦6 |
| 187511779 (Comments: 6) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 16) | Many thanks, apologies for the confusion. I also renumbered the buildings in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187524700 and I am not quite sure if the change has "taken" - #1 is the unit closest to Market Hill. commented 2026-08-16 09:45:01 UTC by webmink ♦1 |
| 185365452 (Comments: 2) | Drzewo29 (Discussed changesets: 4) | w takich przypadkach to polecam OpenHistoricalMap - na Openrailwaymap.app widać wtedy dawne przebiegi linii kolejowych commented 2026-08-16 09:37:04 UTC by Lužicki Bieluch ♦26 |
| 187522377 (Comments: 2) | sarahrifani (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative commented 2026-08-16 09:31:15 UTC by nevw ♦2,299 |
| 187508382 (Comments: 1) | Pietroghe3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, in quel punto esiste già un parcheggio già mappato come area. È strano che tu non lo veda perché è presente nel database già da un anno. Comunque, essendo il tuo nodo un duplicato, l'ho eliminato. commented 2026-08-16 09:25:53 UTC by Mannivu ♦285 |
| 187515964 (Comments: 2) | Bilingual Minds Early Childhood Education (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have fixed the dragged. commented 2026-08-16 09:24:06 UTC by nevw ♦2,299 |
| 184591976 (Comments: 1) | Joe has already been taken (Discussed changesets: 1) | What about the aerodrome? It's not related to the road signs. commented 2026-08-16 09:22:06 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦427 |
| 187405793 (Comments: 1) | Sternentor (Discussed changesets: 3) | Tankstelle war schon als Node vorhanden. commented 2026-08-16 09:21:29 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,095 |
| 187082255 (Comments: 1) | Alex Chamberlain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Alex, le lien vers Panoramax ne fonctionne pas, vers quelle instance avais-tu envoyé l'image ? commented 2026-08-16 09:16:04 UTC by symac ♦17 |
| 187515959 (Comments: 2) | Adi2027 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ...also I see the address is duplicated for each house but the address only needs to be added once. It is probably easiest to leave all the imported address nodes to do that job and then you will only need to add the building tags....but you can dele... commented 2026-08-16 09:12:20 UTC by nevw ♦2,299 |
| 187489728 (Comments: 1) | abbassshh (Discussed changesets: 2) | penelitian dengan judul apa? commented 2026-08-16 08:52:28 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187520342 (Comments: 1) | ariesmunandi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yakin ini kafe? commented 2026-08-16 08:46:16 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187519458 (Comments: 1) | esbi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Witaj, pewnie przez przypadek zdublowałeś dwukrotnie trasy promu Gdańsk–Nynäshamn, które sięgały aż po Łódź. Usunąłem je, a następnym razem proszę zwracaj uwagę na takie możliwe incydenty. commented 2026-08-16 08:43:55 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦118 |
| 187519095 (Comments: 4) | xtenson (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you!!!! commented 2026-08-16 08:24:36 UTC by xtenson ♦1 |
| 187521711 (Comments: 1) | xtenson (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, That's not correct. It's the riverbank. Just use ker CTRL-F5 to empty your cache. I changed the riverbank into grass. commented 2026-08-16 08:19:50 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 178572463 (Comments: 5) | Barefoot Runner (Discussed changesets: 6) | מחכה לתשובתך לשאלה הבאה: האם מקובל עליך שאעביר את התיאורים שזיהיתי מהשם אל התגית הנכונה? commented 2026-08-16 08:12:04 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187521627 (Comments: 1) | xtenson (Discussed changesets: 4) | Alle begin is moeilijk. De oprijlaan heb ik vastgemaakt aan de Waterschapslaam Het zal anders niet routeren. Het adres heb ik verwijderd. Dat staat al op de woning. brick is niet valide.. Ik heb het nu aangepast naar paving_stones. Wannee... commented 2026-08-16 08:08:23 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187492319 (Comments: 1) | Fitra ladjaharia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Perubahan mengenai jalan sekunder sudah pulihkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187521730 Harap gunakan pedoman https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Pedoman_Penandaan_Indonesia commented 2026-08-16 08:06:03 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187519270 (Comments: 1) | xtenson (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag xtenson. landuse=canal is niet valide. Het is het talud. Kennelijk staan daar bomen, want het is ooit geïmporteerd als zijnde groen gebied. Ik heb de landuse hersteld. Wanneer het geen geboomte is kun je het evt veranderen naar bv landuse... commented 2026-08-16 08:00:32 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187491987 (Comments: 1) | Fitra ladjaharia (Discussed changesets: 2) | Perubahan ini telah dipulihkan dalam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187521586 Harap ikuti panduan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Pedoman_Penandaan_Indonesia commented 2026-08-16 08:00:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 186357369 (Comments: 1) | RHTueb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo RHTueb, Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für deine wertvollen Einträge! Da du neu bist hier ein paar Anmerkungen, wie man es noch schöner eintragen kann: 1) Parkhauseinfahrt https://www.openstreetmap... commented 2026-08-16 08:00:14 UTC by Metzor ♦415 |
| 187460776 (Comments: 2) | Yorvik Prestigitator (Discussed changesets: 91) | *or unknown commented 2026-08-16 07:58:07 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦436 |
| 158440006 (Comments: 5) | Evan Carroll (Discussed changesets: 19) | Since there was no reply, I've edited out temporary/mobile objects and unverifiable tags and kept all the rest. Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187521447 commented 2026-08-16 07:57:21 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187519237 (Comments: 3) | Triagustian (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oke, nama jalan saya ikutin dari bawaannya saja, biar tidak ada perubahan dari bawaannya. commented 2026-08-16 07:55:08 UTC by Triagustian ♦2 |
| 187473613 (Comments: 1) | ViktorBel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Зачем в названии писать дорога если это итак объект "дорога"? commented 2026-08-16 07:52:55 UTC by Uralla ♦68 |
| 187521214 (Comments: 1) | Faristoteles (Discussed changesets: 2) | tips: jangan menyambung titik jalan dengan penggunaan lahan commented 2026-08-16 07:52:21 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187517819 (Comments: 1) | Gede Suadnyana (Discussed changesets: 1) | harap ikuti hingga selesai tutorialnya dahulu commented 2026-08-16 07:47:48 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187072781 (Comments: 3) | אמר רבא (Discussed changesets: 5) | מאחר ולא הייתה תגובה ולא הגיוני שיש ארון באמצע הכביש, שחזרתי את המצב לקדמותו ב- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187521094 commented 2026-08-16 07:45:35 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187517493 (Comments: 1) | RiesG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-16 07:44:18 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 186961153 (Comments: 2) | Omer2209 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted road and added barrier instead in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187521034 commented 2026-08-16 07:43:56 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187366585 (Comments: 3) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 18) | Fixed! Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187520893 commented 2026-08-16 07:41:37 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187362461 (Comments: 3) | freek500 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ja, dat (over adres) klopt inderdaad: als er meerdere voorzieningen in één gebouw zijn en maar één adres is, zet je de eerste voorziening op de adres-node (de hoofdvoorziening als die er is - en duidelijk is welke dat is) ... commented 2026-08-16 07:34:28 UTC by roelant ♦14 |
| 187290122 (Comments: 1) | Sastro_AA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Rumayura 13D1 itu penginapan? commented 2026-08-16 07:21:10 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
 | 187069277 (Comments: 9) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 207) | 1. What I said is `=use_sidepath` means legally must walk on sidewalks, and walking on roadways is banned. It doesn't mean "recommend not doing that". 2. What does this mean? They should act according to lack of `=sidewalk` , or pr... commented 2026-08-16 07:13:17 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,000 |
| 187514691 (Comments: 1) | RDAltvater (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. I think this would be better mapped by tagging the driveway itself rather than adding several nodes with names such as "Private Driveway". If access by the general public is actually restricted, access=priv... commented 2026-08-16 07:04:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187396343 (Comments: 1) | wireguy (Discussed changesets: 27) | Oops, missed a leading zero in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137406320/history/6 - Fixed! commented 2026-08-16 06:51:54 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187463642 (Comments: 2) | Emil1887 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Verstehe ich das richtig, du hast die area highway über eine Relation umgebaut? Das macht das Handling der Daten meiner Meinung nach unnötig aufwändig. Das sollten einfach Flächen bleiben die verklebt sind. --- ... commented 2026-08-16 06:50:50 UTC by tordans ♦438 |
| 180040491 (Comments: 6) | Pavol33 (Discussed changesets: 77) | Ahoj, uz to jeden opravoval, tak som si myslel, ze to je OK. Co sa tyka toho vyhradeneho parkovania, tak ano po 18h a cez vikend je to paas. Ak by si chcel vidiet ako ta tabula vyzera, tak na mapy.com som pridal fotky na tie miesta. Bud mi urob jeden... commented 2026-08-16 06:43:17 UTC by Pavol33 ♦65 |
| 157559842 (Comments: 2) | Leon K2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Feel free to change it. commented 2026-08-16 06:36:53 UTC by Leon K2 ♦3 |
 | 187389218 (Comments: 1) | muhammad saqib (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-16 06:34:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187207578 (Comments: 1) | cohenjkimmel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, In the future, please take the time do document the rationale behind your edits using a real changeset comment. It is not acceptable to type gibberish into the changeset comment box: other humans review your work and need to know what y... commented 2026-08-16 06:26:53 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187415066 (Comments: 2) | Ygramul (Discussed changesets: 46) | Du hast völlig recht. Ist behoben :-) Das kam nur, weil da jemand Mülleimer verteilt hat, um offline in CoMaps Hinweise zu hinterlassen. Das war etwas chaotisch ... commented 2026-08-16 06:24:45 UTC by Ygramul ♦85 |
| 187260808 (Comments: 1) | x524_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. In this edit, you added a traffic light instead of a stop sign, and you also removed crossing tags for the explicitly mapped crossing. You can review my changes here: https://www.openstreetm... commented 2026-08-16 06:22:42 UTC by citrula ♦1,004 |
| 180328588 (Comments: 2) | BrenZan (Discussed changesets: 1) | The Jane change was in error: I had unknowingly selected the sidewalk on Jane and changed it when I had meant to only change the one on York Gate - I've since reverted the change. As for the paths on York Gate, I have trouble recollecting... commented 2026-08-16 06:11:10 UTC by BrenZan ♦1 |
| 187517631 (Comments: 1) | RiesG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OSM, Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Probeer als het kan op de adresnode bij te taggen. MVG, eggie commented 2026-08-16 06:07:44 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187510688 (Comments: 1) | Henk Abma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-16 06:04:38 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 184970275 (Comments: 2) | cweiske (Discussed changesets: 3) | Weisst du, ob es bei Streetcomplete für das Löschen der tracktype+smoothness einen Bugreport gibt? commented 2026-08-16 06:02:16 UTC by cweiske ♦2 |
| 162944913 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 85) | Zmieniłeś status porzuconego szlaku rowerowego na icn (międzynarodowy). Dlaczego? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2721365 commented 2026-08-16 06:01:28 UTC by VA00 ♦651 |
| 174715146 (Comments: 2) | gscholz (Discussed changesets: 143) | Hallo Pawe1909 , das mag schon sein, dazu würde ich aber mal den originalen Autor befragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174661540#map=16/49.12990/9.23248 Gruß Guido commented 2026-08-16 06:00:54 UTC by gscholz ♦2,951 |
| 129761212 (Comments: 1) | nreilly (Discussed changesets: 1) | For node/10241260593/history I think leisure=trampoline_park is likely a better fit. commented 2026-08-16 05:46:25 UTC by aharvey ♦1,973 |
| 187370796 (Comments: 1) | jstnvo99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187517543 commented 2026-08-16 05:45:15 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 150678925 (Comments: 1) | DomPaPo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Obecné popisné názvy (králíky, andulky...) nepatří do name. Opravil jsem, dej na to v budoucnu pozor. Dik. commented 2026-08-16 05:39:16 UTC by Tomas_J ♦402 |
| 116322639 (Comments: 1) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 84) | That looks like an incorrect opening_hours=*. If it's closed, shouldn't the relevant features just get removed? Or is is now just access=private? commented 2026-08-16 05:23:07 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
 | 187471425 (Comments: 1) | HRZA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, The buildings will look a lot better if they are squared up. I've squared up these ones for you. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-08-16 05:03:01 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
 | 187414167 (Comments: 1) | ulyssemodeling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187516647 commented 2026-08-16 04:56:03 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187514577 (Comments: 1) | Kim Kong (Discussed changesets: 5) | 要不把这个加入 relation/20736682 关系 commented 2026-08-16 03:29:09 UTC by smallCat ♦28 |
 | 187385608 (Comments: 4) | Toygar Alak (Discussed changesets: 13) | Merhaba @yitimox . İlgili yolu bilmiyorum. Dolayısıyla Hadımköy-İstanbul Caddesi'nin sınıfı hakkında bir şey yazmayacağım. "Bu konuda tartışmak istemiyorum, eğer gerçekten haklı olduğunuzu düşü... commented 2026-08-16 03:10:02 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦262 |
| 187483469 (Comments: 1) | Noah Vale (Discussed changesets: 5) | All these named forestry roads should be unclassified not land access tracks. Generally a land access track might be around a paddock or maybe around the edge of the forestry coupe but some of these are major access roads for logging activities. commented 2026-08-16 03:06:41 UTC by tastrax ♦1,211 |
| 186817893 (Comments: 1) | quoof (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock camera commented 2026-08-16 03:04:10 UTC by xdkid ♦1 |
| 174576267 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | Do not use descriptive names for OSM features. The name=* tag should be the signed name of a feature. If there is no signed name, then the feature should have no name=* tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag... commented 2026-08-16 02:54:15 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
 | 187029709 (Comments: 2) | Sanjeet OSM (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert of all CS - undiscussed Organised Import commented 2026-08-16 02:42:15 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 177892208 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | On way 1177992640 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177992640, it looks like you got the turn lane indications mixed up. I don't think there would be a right-turn lane on the left lane of a multi-lane road. I fixed the turn lane indicatons in c... commented 2026-08-16 02:41:19 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187039991 (Comments: 2) | ShadowMapper01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert of all CS - undiscussed Organised Import commented 2026-08-16 02:31:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 184986912 (Comments: 3) | CharlieJeit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi again, Would you happen to know if you can get on the greenway here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2623832364/ ? commented 2026-08-16 02:27:56 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 187047593 (Comments: 2) | UrbanMapper01 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert of all CS - undiscussed Organised Import commented 2026-08-16 02:25:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 178312802 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please don't abbreviate street names. Spell out full street names. Per the OSM Wiki documentation on abbreviations, it states: > If the name can be spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it. Computers can easily sh... commented 2026-08-16 02:19:16 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187050572 (Comments: 2) | StreetScope07 (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert of all CS - undiscussed Organised Import commented 2026-08-16 02:13:04 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 171657870 (Comments: 1) | Rodolfo Busolin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Você tem a lei que criou este bairro? commented 2026-08-16 02:11:11 UTC by AjBelnuovo ♦113 |
| 187314433 (Comments: 1) | alfial (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2026-08-16 02:08:23 UTC by jmarchon ♦455 |
| 187417639 (Comments: 1) | Roscoe99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! commented 2026-08-16 02:05:37 UTC by jmarchon ♦455 |
| 100736531 (Comments: 2) | crodthauser (Discussed changesets: 11) | Looks good to me. They also still offer rowing boats (and pedal boats). commented 2026-08-16 01:11:14 UTC by crodthauser ♦28 |
| 187507294 (Comments: 1) | Tschars (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21101 commented 2026-08-16 01:10:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 137251139 (Comments: 1) | PubUpdater (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1069289177/ It seems that details for Bullhouse (brewery, West Belfast) are being conflated with Bullhouse East (pub, East Belfast). The post code here is given as BT12 6QA, but BT12 is on th... commented 2026-08-16 01:05:57 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 187470425 (Comments: 1) | Amis9707 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi again, Went ahead and fixed the dragged node in this change set to. commented 2026-08-16 01:05:24 UTC by MassCartog ♦457 |
| 187470275 (Comments: 1) | Amis9707 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi welcome to Openstreetmap. Wanted to let you know that in this changeset and your next changeset looks like you unintentionally dragged a few nodes way out of place. Try to be careful not to move any of the nodes that are not working on and make su... commented 2026-08-16 01:03:22 UTC by MassCartog ♦457 |
 | 187512844 (Comments: 1) | TuAmigoElEditor (Discussed changesets: 62) | *menor que 80k de población y en descenso. commented 2026-08-16 00:46:44 UTC by TuAmigoElEditor ♦73 |
| 186127376 (Comments: 1) | GTFOOO! (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.\r \r If these cameras are real, plea... commented 2026-08-16 00:41:20 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦264 |
| 186515848 (Comments: 1) | Christian Dier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kleine Frage: woher stammt denn der reg_name „Der Gesichtsverlust“? (Die Anführungszeichen beim Wert hab ich entfernt, gehören da nicht hin.) Den habe ich für diesen Brunnen noch nie gehört und finde auch nichts per We... commented 2026-08-16 00:38:54 UTC by goodidea ♦148 |
| 186515067 (Comments: 1) | Christian Dier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Kurze Info: nach diesen Änderungen waren ein paar Knoten nicht mehr sauber mit allen Gebäude-Outlines (und building:part-Outlines) verbunden (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13585141122, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1088528... commented 2026-08-16 00:33:42 UTC by goodidea ♦148 |
| 187099115 (Comments: 2) | LGloaguen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ahah, je t'ai devancé :-) commented 2026-08-16 00:31:38 UTC by LGloaguen ♦8 |
| 187465339 (Comments: 2) | SandraLeiva (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your feedback. I will be more careful. commented 2026-08-16 00:21:40 UTC by SandraLeiva ♦1 |
| 186516693 (Comments: 1) | Christian Dier (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo! Eine Frage zu deiner Änderung: gibt es eine Quelle zum Namen „Kulturhaus“ bzw. „Festsaal Kulturhaus“ (Schloßplatz 15a)? Deine changeset-Angabe source=local knowledge hilft da leider gar nicht weiter. <... commented 2026-08-15 23:41:18 UTC by goodidea ♦148 |
| 187511439 (Comments: 1) | johslarsen (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am not sure about the need for these shelter areas in the first place though. For reference the official Svipper app shows only the platform nodes, not the areas, and the Entur app only shows the Kvaløysletta terminal bus station as a... commented 2026-08-15 23:14:54 UTC by johslarsen ♦1 |
 | 187511262 (Comments: 1) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 48) | Also edited the relation Genesis: Mariveles → Pasay via Skyway, Osmeña Highway/South Superhighway, Roxas Boulevard, and EDSA. commented 2026-08-15 23:02:27 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦42 |
| 142365932 (Comments: 4) | hca (Discussed changesets: 17) | Könnte eventuell das Resultat einer Konflikt-Lösung (mit JOSM) sein. commented 2026-08-15 22:56:42 UTC by hca ♦17 |
| 179002092 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please don't abbreviate street names. Spell out the full street name. The name=* tag on way 1091969460 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091969460) should be spelled out to "Sequoia Drive Southwest". The name=* tag on ways 1482628086... commented 2026-08-15 22:47:20 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187416040 (Comments: 1) | SuborbitalPigeon (Discussed changesets: 20) | Partially revert this to add the garages back commented 2026-08-15 22:34:16 UTC by SuborbitalPigeon ♦42 |
 | 167905795 (Comments: 1) | archie (Discussed changesets: 305) | Why? commented 2026-08-15 22:29:03 UTC by wombatmaper ♦111 |
| 179131084 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | Corrected in changeset 187510433 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187510433 https://osmcha.org/changesets/187510433 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2026-08-15 22:27:41 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 186189302 (Comments: 1) | Wise_Turtle (Discussed changesets: 9) | Не стоило удалять. Это отношение было зданием пока его не смомали. Поправлю. commented 2026-08-15 22:27:33 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 179460879 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please don't glue roads to administrative boundaries. If you glue a road to an administrative boundary and another user modifies the road after it's geometry changes, then it can easily modify the boundary. Per the OSM Wiki documentation on... commented 2026-08-15 22:19:37 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 186701257 (Comments: 15) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | По-скоро има двоен стандарт. Това можеш да го кажеш на умниците, които са решили така да се тагват. Защото ако JOSM валидатора грешеше, щяха ... commented 2026-08-15 22:03:57 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 181001434 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please do not use descriptive names. The name=* tag should be used for the signed name of a feature (e.g., signs), not for describing features. The residential road you mapped here with the name=* tag of "Alley Way" would probably be better... commented 2026-08-15 22:01:43 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187499782 (Comments: 2) | Heinz (Discussed changesets: 12) | deleted commented 2026-08-15 21:52:45 UTC by Heinz ♦7 |
| 186761516 (Comments: 2) | andyp14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! I submitted updates to fix the overlapping cart paths. commented 2026-08-15 21:50:42 UTC by andyp14 ♦1 |
| 182212989 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted in changeset 187509619 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187509619 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182212989 commented 2026-08-15 21:48:16 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187505411 (Comments: 1) | Aim311_ (Discussed changesets: 80) | ale way 1536305024 i obok, ty tam byłeś czy jechałeś obok autem? może jak się leci 90km/h to może dlatego źle widziałes? commented 2026-08-15 21:47:58 UTC by Yog Sot ♦536 |
| 180144768 (Comments: 1) | Pavol33 (Discussed changesets: 77) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13664137403 ta tabula vyzera uplne zle. Za zonu30 sa plati? A je to koniec obce (city_limit)? Pohladajte spravne hodnoty na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign . commented 2026-08-15 21:45:15 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,996 |
 | 187504127 (Comments: 1) | Misr Connect (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-15 21:41:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187483288 (Comments: 1) | SamsTiresWheels (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-15 21:38:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 182839051 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted in changeset 187509057 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187509057 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182839051 commented 2026-08-15 21:29:06 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187509057 (Comments: 1) | Frank Peng (Discussed changesets: 33) | Revert of changeset 182839051 (https://osmcha.org/changesets/182839051). commented 2026-08-15 21:27:24 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187445737 (Comments: 2) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Sur le fond tu as raison. Sur la forme c'est plus discutable car wall=no, d'après le wiki (anglais comme français) désigne plusieurs choses différentes qu'il est impossible de différencier sauf... commented 2026-08-15 21:19:05 UTC by Yunan973 ♦149 |
| 187508810 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 60) | mapillary commented 2026-08-15 21:18:05 UTC by Alex_457 ♦79 |
| 185016923 (Comments: 1) | I W (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi — thanks for tidying up around the Houston House. I have moved the Texas Historical Commission marker tags (memorial=plaque, ref:US-TX:thc=5355, ref:hmdb) back onto node 12403574645 and left way 1534776326 as a plain building, in changeset 1... commented 2026-08-15 21:15:47 UTC by BubbleGuppies ♦8 |
| 187506768 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 3) | These ways should not be tagged as highway=secondary since they are not connected to any other roads of the same classification or higher. Tagging roads based on their planned FUTURE usage is incorrect and should be done using lifecycle prefixes inst... commented 2026-08-15 21:14:51 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦45 |
| 187498406 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1000) | Thanks for the cleanup! NB, node 14053130250 with a Source=* [sic] of Google Maps had its the name:en=* removed here (which was added separately after that source tag was added), but not the node and the rest of the tags added by the same user... commented 2026-08-15 21:10:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187508223 (Comments: 2) | Ayrat Vico (Discussed changesets: 3) | Restored address commented 2026-08-15 21:03:17 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187465867 (Comments: 3) | 4N6nerd (Discussed changesets: 5) | More direct resource in en re: Google: https://osm.wiki/Google To emphasize what @eggie said, f you can independently verify some of this information with allowed sources that do not involve Google Maps (e.g. in person survey, the company... commented 2026-08-15 20:53:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187507671 (Comments: 1) | Mevess (Discussed changesets: 28) | commentaire : types de bâtiments, correction diverses sur les voies (accès, portails), zonage source : BD Ortho IGN; survey commented 2026-08-15 20:40:53 UTC by Mevess ♦104 |
| 187064416 (Comments: 3) | user_5589 (Discussed changesets: 63) | According to the wiki, I paste/copy "Exceptions for using one area to represent more than one space: - A lot of similar parking spaces side by side without any differing attributes and you don't want to put that much effort into it -... commented 2026-08-15 20:37:36 UTC by Yunan973 ♦149 |
| 187501956 (Comments: 1) | akiakinom (Discussed changesets: 1) | place=locality to nie jest odpowiedni tag na murek commented 2026-08-15 20:25:20 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 187476623 (Comments: 1) | Florian Grünkraut 3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Folgende Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen: - Du gibst als Quelle unter anderem „Hydrantenplan“ an. Eine Übernahme ohne Prüfung ist zu vermeiden. Es gilt https://wiki.... commented 2026-08-15 20:23:02 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 187490106 (Comments: 2) | daripper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Servus, danke für den Hinweis. Werde ich morgen raus nehmen. commented 2026-08-15 20:20:21 UTC by daripper ♦1 |
 | 187449091 (Comments: 2) | Hensor (Discussed changesets: 1) | lol commented 2026-08-15 20:12:02 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦13 |
| 187505083 (Comments: 1) | GerjanK (Discussed changesets: 5) | Beste GerJan. Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. Dus niet nogmaals adressen aan te maken. Je krijgt anders overal dubbele adressen. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=187505083 MVG eggie commented 2026-08-15 20:11:50 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187505838 (Comments: 1) | GerjanK (Discussed changesets: 5) | Beste GerJan, Dingen toegevoegd zegt niemand iets. Geef svp concreet commentaar. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-15 20:09:54 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187504900 (Comments: 1) | Sem3124 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback .. oneway=no hoef je niet te taggen. Het is default op wegen. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-15 20:08:14 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
 | 187265684 (Comments: 1) | j0k4i (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola, j0k4i. ¿A qué se debe que no se pueda usar la calle Martín Rodríguez? Lo digo por todas las restricciones de giro hacia esa calle. commented 2026-08-15 20:07:13 UTC by serock ♦82 |
| 187502862 (Comments: 1) | Jildert Visser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-15 20:06:22 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
 | 187488730 (Comments: 1) | dontonio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Saludos. Estas abarcando areas grandes bajo el landuse=farmland y otras areas de uso de sueles, te sugiero que hagas segmentos mas pequeños, sin pasar por encima de vias significativas o areas pobladas. Areas grandes son mas difícile... commented 2026-08-15 19:51:16 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,550 |
| 187489784 (Comments: 1) | dontonio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Saludos. Estas abarcando areas grandes bajo el landuse=farmland, te sugiero que hagas segmentos mas pequeños, sin pasar por encima de vias significativas o areas pobladas. Areas grandes son mas dificiles de editar cuando hay que hacer corre... commented 2026-08-15 19:49:27 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,550 |
 | 187491773 (Comments: 2) | simateam (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am deeply touched by your generous praise and will do my utmost to live up to it. Thank you, my friend. commented 2026-08-15 19:42:19 UTC by simateam ♦1 |
| 187312584 (Comments: 1) | Alexpitocho (Discussed changesets: 2) | No debería estar marcado como en obras? Los cuatro bloques de parque están cerrados a peatones desde invierno. Se prometió a apertura en julio pero se ha aplazado sin fecha clara... commented 2026-08-15 19:33:24 UTC by CrashLogger ♦2 |
| 187414860 (Comments: 1) | LEDFlighter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ich habe die Fläche way/1549492993 als Reitplatz umgetaggt und dafür die Reitanlage vom Pony- und Reit-Club als Knoten node/14095729852 ergänzt, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/R#Reitstall commented 2026-08-15 19:23:39 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦903 |
| 187466382 (Comments: 2) | Hufkratzer (Discussed changesets: 7) | Der Kommentar hätte an changeset/187414860 gesollt ( way/1549492993 ) commented 2026-08-15 19:20:59 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦903 |
| 71753267 (Comments: 1) | okromario (Discussed changesets: 1) | Darf man über die Brücke gehen oder nicht? Durch access:no lassen mich Bergfex, Alpenvereinaktiv und Garmin Connect keine Route über auf diesem Fußweg planen. Da hilft foot:yes nicht dagegen. commented 2026-08-15 19:14:31 UTC by René84828 ♦13 |
| 185662345 (Comments: 3) | Iwerne (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ok, thanks. So it's the amenity=toilets tag on the building that's wrong then... commented 2026-08-15 19:05:36 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦337 |
| 183078076 (Comments: 2) | Map_HeRo (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Marvin, da hast Du ohne Zweifel Recht. Danke für's korrigieren. Ich bin normalerweise mit dem Detailmappen von elektrischen Anlagen sehr zurückhaltend, da ich davon zu wenig verstehe - kann mich nicht erinnern, warum ich hier eine A... commented 2026-08-15 18:54:54 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦109 |
 | 115492684 (Comments: 1) | Quainer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016411666/ Apologies for dragging up an old changeset. Is this meant to be the now-demolished house I have just mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549992052/ commented 2026-08-15 18:41:35 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 184327817 (Comments: 2) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 33) | Moin, ja die waren ursprünglich im Einmündungsbereich direkt auf dem Kreuzungspunkt bzw. unmittelbar direkt daneben eingezeichnet. Habe dort nur den einen gegenüber der Ammerländer Str. gesehen. Zwischen Radweg u. Straße ... commented 2026-08-15 18:33:15 UTC by BB-plan ♦15 |
| 187500880 (Comments: 1) | Ayrat Vico (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi.. That was the wrong addressnode. I moved the opening hours to the right addressnode. Gr ggie commented 2026-08-15 18:29:49 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187498715 (Comments: 1) | sal256 (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187500231 commented 2026-08-15 18:18:18 UTC by sal256 ♦3 |
| 187424033 (Comments: 1) | strazak998* (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj, zauważyłem, że kształty obiektów przez Ciebie rozrysowanych, a w szczególności budynków, były niezbyt poprawne. Część z nich wyglądała na odwzorowaną z podkładu Binga, który wymaga ręcznej kalibracj... commented 2026-08-15 18:15:28 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦118 |
| 187024380 (Comments: 2) | antigerme (Discussed changesets: 15) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187501515 commented 2026-08-15 18:05:36 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187486988 (Comments: 2) | JoshuaR (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey bxl-forever, I'll try to fix that and add the return journey. commented 2026-08-15 17:55:56 UTC by JoshuaR ♦3 |
| 187497705 (Comments: 1) | greenie11 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Cool. Mit einem guten Luftbild könnte man jede Bahn einzeichnen :joy: commented 2026-08-15 17:55:03 UTC by m_fuhrmann ♦70 |
| 160810923 (Comments: 1) | stefantrninic (Discussed changesets: 4) | Perchè ref ss14 dentro monfalcone? commented 2026-08-15 17:50:38 UTC by alessandrocarmeli ♦249 |
 | 166138339 (Comments: 2) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 113) | Olá Rui Obrigado pelo aviso. Só pode ter sido um lapso pois não há nenhuma razão para remover o nome de um waterway. Já está reposto. RB commented 2026-08-15 17:39:47 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦111 |
 | 187108368 (Comments: 1) | خیاطی گلستان (Discussed changesets: 1) | کسب و کار کاربر اوپن استریت مپ نمیشود بلکه یادداشت ثبت میکند. commented 2026-08-15 17:25:08 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦37 |
| 187497256 (Comments: 1) | TheVolter (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag TheVolter, de info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-15 17:21:07 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187499308 (Comments: 1) | nl-mapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bing Maps and VBMP Most Recent Imagery was used for this edit. commented 2026-08-15 17:14:34 UTC by nl-mapper ♦5 |
| 186367558 (Comments: 2) | bbmc_GAE (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi SekeRob, thank you for your comment. Could you help me restore the map or do it yourself? I'm sorry this happened. Best regards! commented 2026-08-15 17:05:51 UTC by bbmc_GAE ♦2 |
| 163141198 (Comments: 2) | totera (Discussed changesets: 19) | Ciao f_gonella, non ho informazioni recenti. Mi sembra importante aver escluso che siano state usate nuove denominazioni come nel caso delle SP235 e 236, quindi penso che se vuoi puoi procedere al cambio. Nemmeno sulla questione variante so risponder... commented 2026-08-15 17:04:11 UTC by totera ♦352 |
| 185950932 (Comments: 1) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 353) | Hi, 'loop=yes' looks like a mistake - I guess it should be 'roundtrip' on the relation? commented 2026-08-15 16:57:42 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 184467772 (Comments: 1) | Blythe0625 (Discussed changesets: 7) | more administrative boundaries in Pangasinan, Zambales and Aurora commented 2026-08-15 16:57:10 UTC by News General ♦6 |
| 186435979 (Comments: 1) | Al1110 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I had to revert this and several other changesets of yours. Google Maps is not a valid source for edits in OSM. commented 2026-08-15 16:56:24 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 186078881 (Comments: 3) | vlakos555 (Discussed changesets: 93) | Super, potom dakujem. Lebo takych semaforov je v Bratislave len par. Ostatne stovky krabiciek na semaforoch zelenu nespustaju. Vzdy teda treba tie krabicky otestovat, ci aktivuju zelenu. commented 2026-08-15 16:50:26 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,996 |
| 187497846 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 178) | Широчината на тротоара до релсите(поне в южната част) ми се стори, че е около 3.5 м. Широк е. А може би широчината на междурелсието и около тя... commented 2026-08-15 16:50:17 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 187490755 (Comments: 3) | rar@eu (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi Rene.. We zijn tegenwoordig toch wat behoudender om iets op slot te zetten. Ook brandgangen. Voorheen tagde ik ook private.. maar tegenwoordig permissive behalve bij 461 wvs. Mapse commented 2026-08-15 16:46:42 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187491010 (Comments: 3) | Harly47 (Discussed changesets: 1) | In questo caso, senza nome descrittivo. È come su una fontana aggiungi name=fontana (che si però vede spesso). commented 2026-08-15 16:29:53 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦364 |
 | 184064200 (Comments: 1) | الزعيم الشمالي (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! please don't delete the original name. move it to the proper language tag (e.g., name:en=*) and put the Arabic name in name:ar=*. please fix this to avoid data loss. Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-15 16:18:23 UTC by VLD0251 ♦149 |
| 187400787 (Comments: 6) | Denis_Helfer (Discussed changesets: 77) | Pour aller plus loin avec la communauté alsacienne (essentiellement strasbourgeoise) il ya le canal Telegram t.me/OSM_Alsace. Il y a notamment un certain https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rouelibre1 qui s'intéresse aussi au v&e... commented 2026-08-15 16:12:49 UTC by Denis_Helfer ♦103 |
| 187310059 (Comments: 1) | xcep (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi! You have tagged road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445247920/history/26 as `busway` though it is not true, because it is secondary road. I've corrected it. `busway` is road designated only for buses. Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-15 16:04:11 UTC by JanezPavelZebovec ♦38 |
| 186697328 (Comments: 2) | YougiOff (Discussed changesets: 1) | Effectivement, après recherches, il semblerait que la convention en France soit celle du "Schéma de Charlieu" (addr unique, contact:addr sur les POI). L'éditeur ID ne tenant pas compte de cette convention, j'a... commented 2026-08-15 15:52:28 UTC by YougiOff ♦2 |
| 187395270 (Comments: 1) | autocaddie (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, I've deleted your test fairway. I'm not sure what you're testing exactly. If you would like to share your testing goals, maybe I could help you understand why your test failed. commented 2026-08-15 15:41:32 UTC by b-jazz ♦920 |
| 187410708 (Comments: 1) | sphimmer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please refrain from commentary like "pit of despair" when mapping. Stick to the facts of what is on the ground. Also, please make sure you don't overlap things like fairways/roughs/greens. Thanks. commented 2026-08-15 15:38:13 UTC by b-jazz ♦920 |
| 187427512 (Comments: 3) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 112) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38549772 is secondary because it connects to other roads (residential and service) while https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439693075 doesn't have any other roads coming off of it, it is only there as a shortcut ... commented 2026-08-15 15:32:23 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
 | 186660538 (Comments: 2) | Juan MAS (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, thanks for the observation, correction is done. commented 2026-08-15 15:26:50 UTC by Juan MAS ♦13 |
| 187486349 (Comments: 1) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 3) | a few issues here, first road centerline should not be attached to road markings (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549570037), second the exit ramp from HEFT to Southwest 120th Street was aligned to the correct road marking before this edit, I have... commented 2026-08-15 15:17:14 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187340641 (Comments: 1) | OlasMapy (Discussed changesets: 23) | Czy ten chodnik https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493267642 już jest ukończony do ruchu pieszych? commented 2026-08-15 15:14:05 UTC by kubzon7 ♦29 |
| 187487972 (Comments: 1) | Ayrat Vico (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM.. Please use the present addressnode to tag on. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-08-15 15:10:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187493339 (Comments: 1) | pling09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ist die Wendestellenform so korrekt? commented 2026-08-15 15:10:06 UTC by pling09 ♦1 |
 | 187490022 (Comments: 1) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 50) | verified with visual clues from video blog and the terrain view commented 2026-08-15 15:06:52 UTC by BholeKiBhasam ♦36 |
| 187465650 (Comments: 1) | HugoC01 (Discussed changesets: 39) | [[File:Panneau FR E53c D75EPR0+050U.jpg|thumb|Panneau kilométrique sur la D75E (01)]] commented 2026-08-15 15:05:02 UTC by HugoC01 ♦57 |
| 187462069 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM8 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здраствуйте! Мой косяк, поспешил и отправил не убедившись в выравнивании углов. commented 2026-08-15 15:00:05 UTC by Ozon OSM8 ♦2 |
| 186995507 (Comments: 1) | elco6285 (Discussed changesets: 1) | In this changeset you edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265427738 adding amenity=toilets but leaving the previous tag disused:amenity=toilets . Can you confirm that the toilets are back open again now, and so the disused:amenity=toilets... commented 2026-08-15 14:52:48 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦337 |
| 186659822 (Comments: 1) | tourenbegleiter (Discussed changesets: 2) | In this changeset you added a check_date=* tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2345013392 . But this node is currently tagged with both amenity=toilets and disused:amenity=toilets . Can you confirm whether they're currently o... commented 2026-08-15 14:51:03 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦337 |
 | 187492396 (Comments: 1) | sauce1984 (Discussed changesets: 7) | imagery: Bing Maps Aerial commented 2026-08-15 14:49:11 UTC by sauce1984 ♦8 |
| 187452640 (Comments: 1) | sal256 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Cześć, dodawanie nowej linii chodnika w takim przypadku nie jest rekomendowane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549692027 CPR mapujemy 1 linią: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%... commented 2026-08-15 14:33:32 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 187286163 (Comments: 1) | Negjana (Discussed changesets: 82) | Der Wien Floridsdorf Fbf Knoten mitten zwischen den Gleisen führt dazu, dass die OpenRailwayMap den yard bis zur Brünner Straße einzeichnet. Außerdem ist der ja nur auf einer Seite der Strecke. mMn sollte der nicht mittig einget... commented 2026-08-15 14:10:52 UTC by hlfan ♦108 |
| 185459441 (Comments: 3) | OstapFrolgeo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Хорошо, удачи со следующими правками. commented 2026-08-15 14:09:56 UTC by rmntgx ♦2 |
| 148115844 (Comments: 1) | Ilanride22 (Discussed changesets: 39) | שלום! האם שם אזור הפיקניק "בזק" או שזאת טעות? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682994272 commented 2026-08-15 14:04:33 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 180099095 (Comments: 2) | DAB30 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ein Straßenschild wird man durchaus vor Ort nicht finden. Jedoch wird das dort befindliche Wochenendgrundstück Seitens Versorgern unter dieser Anschrift geführt und aufgesucht. Die Vergabe der Anschrift erfolgte möglicherweise un... commented 2026-08-15 14:02:15 UTC by DAB30 ♦1 |
| 187490245 (Comments: 2) | PROFORO Kancelaria Prawna Poznań | Radca Prawny | Doradca Restrukturyzacyjny | Syndyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | mail: biuro@proforo.pl commented 2026-08-15 14:01:18 UTC by PROFORO Kancelaria Prawna Poznań | Radca Prawny | Doradca Restrukturyzacyjny | Syndyk ♦1 |
| 186578074 (Comments: 4) | idith (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you. It looks good now. commented 2026-08-15 13:56:28 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187464633 (Comments: 1) | FuckFlock420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | These are not Flock ALPRs, They are axon outpost/ Axon lightpost. Also the user name FuckFlock420 screams cop. commented 2026-08-15 13:53:56 UTC by Jethroseems ♦1 |
| 187430346 (Comments: 2) | מעלותניק (Discussed changesets: 3) | מתנצל על הסיבוך ב-2. לא צריך באמת לפצל לשניים רק להוסיף נקודה משותפת איפה שהם נפגשים commented 2026-08-15 13:53:16 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187429637 (Comments: 1) | מעלותניק (Discussed changesets: 3) | השארתי הערה כאן: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187430346 commented 2026-08-15 13:51:39 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187429951 (Comments: 1) | מעלותניק (Discussed changesets: 3) | השארתי הערה כאן: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187430346 commented 2026-08-15 13:51:31 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187486116 (Comments: 1) | Cardiff_Electric (Discussed changesets: 42) | Tu jest strefa 30? Jeśli tak to warto dorzucić source:maxspeed=PL:zone30 commented 2026-08-15 13:36:43 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
 | 187487872 (Comments: 1) | sauce1984 (Discussed changesets: 7) | source: aerial imagery Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta commented 2026-08-15 13:30:53 UTC by sauce1984 ♦8 |
| 187488813 (Comments: 1) | sauce1984 (Discussed changesets: 7) | source: aerial imagery Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta commented 2026-08-15 13:30:34 UTC by sauce1984 ♦8 |
| 184160487 (Comments: 1) | MSRRT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Camera removed commented 2026-08-15 13:29:59 UTC by MSRRT ♦1 |
| 186696942 (Comments: 5) | Senihtu (Discussed changesets: 50) | "gang und gäbe, dass User Adressen überall dort hinzufügen, wo dies irgendwie möglich ist" und ob es das ist. Als ich in OSM angefangen habe, habe ich genau das gemacht. Ich bin dann recht bald darauf hingewies... commented 2026-08-15 13:24:00 UTC by Senihtu ♦185 |
| 187358178 (Comments: 3) | welzheimerwald (Discussed changesets: 62) | Super, danke! 👍 commented 2026-08-15 13:20:16 UTC by rene78 ♦483 |
| 187482711 (Comments: 1) | Cibelly19 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tem algum link que mostre essas imagens? commented 2026-08-15 13:15:20 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187445755 (Comments: 1) | BiancaGR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Há foto ou alguma fonte (notícia) que mostre a nova placa? commented 2026-08-15 13:12:52 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187338487 (Comments: 2) | ReyDerayos24 (Discussed changesets: 12) | No hay problema, un saludo commented 2026-08-15 12:59:09 UTC by ReyDerayos24 ♦10 |
| 175973120 (Comments: 2) | Thant Zin Maw (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you so much for your review and correcting. Noted with thanks again. commented 2026-08-15 12:58:58 UTC by Thant Zin Maw ♦5 |
| 187478350 (Comments: 1) | warudo (Discussed changesets: 4) | kalau tertarik: https://names-report.pages.dev/indonesia/ commented 2026-08-15 12:57:56 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187369076 (Comments: 2) | Thant Zin Maw (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your comments and I will keep in mind. commented 2026-08-15 12:55:45 UTC by Thant Zin Maw ♦5 |
| 186158586 (Comments: 1) | ProvincieAntwerpen_DMOB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, 'cycleway:right:traffic_sign:supplementary' is not a common tag and not used anywhere else. It's not necessary to have this information: If there is a supplementary sign, add it to 'traffic_sign', if not, no tag is nee... commented 2026-08-15 12:39:05 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 173613858 (Comments: 3) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 57) | Aha, choć nie wiem czy jakoś to zmienić. commented 2026-08-15 12:25:37 UTC by PCK46 ♦9 |
| 168650514 (Comments: 1) | Commune Sarzeau (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, je viens de corriger les cabinets que vous aviez ajouté. Il y avait pas mal d'erreurs : nœuds en dehors des bâtiments, liens n'étant pas le site officiel, attribut de médecin sur des cabinets infirm... commented 2026-08-15 12:14:57 UTC by Syl ♦1,085 |
| 187447380 (Comments: 1) | decoder111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wycofałem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187485341 Takich rzeczy nie oznaczamy na OSM. commented 2026-08-15 12:11:56 UTC by SzymonH ♦228 |
| 187446003 (Comments: 2) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 3) | hi, apologies about incorrect edits - i'm relatively new and sometimes i get carried away as i have BPD. hope you understand. thanks for the corrections. commented 2026-08-15 12:04:50 UTC by devemporer ♦4 |
| 187215947 (Comments: 1) | PierreGuer1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap 👋 Le commentaire de modification est prévu pour indiquer ce que vous avez fait, plutôt que comment (déjà indiqué avec source=survey ici). Ce n’est pas grave bien sûr,... commented 2026-08-15 12:03:36 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
| 185625427 (Comments: 2) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 3) | hi, upon further review of mapillary photo trails that were heavily GPS-obfuscated, i found a photo, however it's blurry: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2014170308734464 commented 2026-08-15 11:59:36 UTC by devemporer ♦4 |
| 187463295 (Comments: 2) | kalamarin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dag kalamarin... De BAG data heb ik teruggezet. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-15 11:55:54 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187426726 (Comments: 4) | Rkkrakow (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ok, to zacznijmy od tych granic. Rozumiem, że nie były one zmieniane w tym zestawie zmian, ale prawdopodobnie niepotrzebnie została zaaplikowana sugestia edytora iD, który je podzielił. Nie zawsze warto się go słuchać, szczegó... commented 2026-08-15 11:55:31 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 186509542 (Comments: 2) | Mapikids (Discussed changesets: 11) | Lien ajouté dans notre profil. commented 2026-08-15 11:55:28 UTC by Mapikids ♦10 |
| 187482498 (Comments: 1) | ilovebirds (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-15 11:48:21 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187479154 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Електроразпределение Плевен не съществува от далечната 2004 година :). Част от ЕРМ Запад е към днешна дата. https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/Електроразп... commented 2026-08-15 11:41:47 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 187215479 (Comments: 2) | freek500 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Ja foutje idd! was de bedoeling om alleen de gegevens van de huisarts te verwijderen commented 2026-08-15 11:33:01 UTC by freek500 ♦8 |
| 169517921 (Comments: 1) | mxwk (Discussed changesets: 13) | OSM tag name: 'name is the name only'. Kuipers, is de naam. De rest, is wat ze doen: +trade=building_materials commented 2026-08-15 11:23:51 UTC by Op'tRad ♦65 |
| 187434127 (Comments: 6) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 14) | all good @deleuzion - as mentioned, I can see few issues with your first edit (#6). Enjoy editing and keep on improving the map commented 2026-08-15 11:06:44 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦504 |
| 187458300 (Comments: 2) | Ronny01896 (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187482658 commented 2026-08-15 11:05:42 UTC by opendcc ♦1,587 |
| 187332767 (Comments: 2) | Lumino_Fantin (Discussed changesets: 2) | >Hello, > I have well received your comment asking to not connect ways to station node. > > I will folow this recommendation but I'm wondering why? Why is it a problem? > Have a nice day, > Fantin Pri... commented 2026-08-15 11:00:22 UTC by DaveF ♦1,679 |
| 186527059 (Comments: 1) | floksa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Siema! Jesteś w stanie zweryfikować w terenie ile z tych szarych powierzchni obok DW 328 w kierunku Kaczorowa za Marciszowem to farma fotowoltaiczna ? Z drogi na pewno ją widać, bo to pamiętam, i coś nawet widać na Sentinelu, ale do końca nie... commented 2026-08-15 10:56:59 UTC by szydzio ♦408 |
| 187450171 (Comments: 3) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 69) | Corrigé https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187482304 commented 2026-08-15 10:56:56 UTC by pyrog ♦456 |
| 169885762 (Comments: 1) | green_leek (Discussed changesets: 44) | hi for node/13044379982 you've set crossing:markings=yes but from my survey on 2026-04-01 there's no markings visible. There does appear to be a crossing, just no markings. Do you have any more recent knowledge? commented 2026-08-15 10:46:50 UTC by aharvey ♦1,973 |
| 187473738 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 116) | Dang it, the source was supposed to be Esri as usual. commented 2026-08-15 10:45:53 UTC by ika-chan! ♦424 |
| 187472195 (Comments: 2) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 46) | Citra satelit bawaan di iD editor itu bukan Google Map. Ada 3 yang disediakan dan diperbolehkan untuk dipetakan (seperti bangunan dan jalan). Kalau yang dimaksud adalah nama2 bisnis, itu memang S&K Google sendiri yang melarang tidak boleh digu... commented 2026-08-15 10:37:32 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187466374 (Comments: 1) | Fernanda Moreno (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Gracias por tu contribución al mapa. Por favor, no agrupes los edificios. Marca cada edificio por separado. Un saludo Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not cluster buildings. Map each building separately.... commented 2026-08-15 10:28:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 117827626 (Comments: 3) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Да, само на възела за пешеходна пътека трябва да е. Чакам iD да пусне обновление, където това да се оправя с един клик. commented 2026-08-15 10:10:07 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 186694105 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 34) | C’est plutôt une description ça ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#When_not_to_use commented 2026-08-15 09:56:10 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
| 187477842 (Comments: 1) | Aerlig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-15 09:52:40 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187465734 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thank you! commented 2026-08-15 09:51:12 UTC by jayaddison ♦46 |
| 187477644 (Comments: 1) | HowlingHusky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi HH, I merged your info with the present addressnode. Please use the addressnodes to tag on. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-08-15 09:49:37 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187466072 (Comments: 1) | 0Rafik (Discussed changesets: 1) | اهلين الوسم الي اخترته يستخدم لمكتبات الالعاب وليست المكتبات العادية https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoy_library اقترح تغيير الوسم الى |
| 176006842 (Comments: 4) | LABEL17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke vielmals captain_slow für die Unterstützung. commented 2026-08-15 09:42:30 UTC by LABEL17 ♦2 |
| 180534898 (Comments: 1) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 283) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493583874/ This is tagged: highway=footway tunnel=yes and: proposed:highway=cycleway Is that correct? commented 2026-08-15 09:38:44 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 187413843 (Comments: 2) | Deftax (Discussed changesets: 19) | Dzięki za zauważenie, oczywiście był to misclick, już poprawione commented 2026-08-15 09:38:17 UTC by Deftax ♦13 |
| 187400579 (Comments: 8) | N129 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, Entschuldigung, dass ich mich einmische. Mich interessiert hier die Quelle der Daten. Wenn sie vor Ort ermittelt wurden, sollte man das im Änderungssatzkommentar als "survey" eintragen. Gruß surveyor54 commented 2026-08-15 09:32:17 UTC by surveyor54 ♦681 |
| 186572996 (Comments: 1) | Mapikids (Discussed changesets: 11) | Cette photo avait été ajoutée précédemment par un autre contributeur (changeset/175675393) et il suffit de la regarder pour constater qu’elle montre l’aire de jeux dans son ensemble, mieux que les photos... commented 2026-08-15 09:32:00 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
| 187475872 (Comments: 14) | 3sonsy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Afslagbeperking toegevoegd only_left_turn except moped mofa bicycle commented 2026-08-15 09:30:01 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 174752732 (Comments: 1) | andrewsem (Discussed changesets: 12) | Пожалуйста не добавляйте в названия островов префикс "о.", для этого уже есть тег place=island commented 2026-08-15 09:21:09 UTC by sikmir ♦12 |
| 186522162 (Comments: 1) | joebiloute (Discussed changesets: 2) | Comment se fait la traversée au niveau de way/603581040 ? Actuellement sur OSM les chemins sont plus ou moins superposés, et il ne semble pas encore y avoir d’aménagement sur les orthophotos de l’IGN. commented 2026-08-15 09:14:56 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
| 187464499 (Comments: 4) | raini (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oké! Helemaal goed. Ik wilde het niet zo als het was laten staan maar heb nog nooit routes omgelegd, vandaar die uren uitzoekwerk. ID is nieuw voor mij en met Go Map!! kwam ik niet verder omdat ik daar geen reden te zien kreeg waarom ik het af... commented 2026-08-15 09:09:05 UTC by raini ♦2 |
| 186509190 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 34) | Quand tu ne sais pas quelle sera la forme du bâtiment, il vaut mieux mettre landuse=construction (+ si connu construction=residential / etc.) plutôt que d’imaginer un bâtiment qui prend toute la place. commented 2026-08-15 08:37:36 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
| 187412197 (Comments: 5) | Monchinho (Discussed changesets: 44) | Misterio resolto hahaha Graciñas commented 2026-08-15 08:34:49 UTC by Monchinho ♦73 |
| 187449144 (Comments: 2) | Muhmaker (Discussed changesets: 38) | Mir war der Mapper aufgefallen weil er aktuell in PB eine Busrelation beschädigt hatte. Vermutlich aber mit guter Absicht. Ich habe dann geschaut was der sonst so treibt und dabei fiel mir diese seltsame Sperrung aus dem April auf. Er hatte nach... commented 2026-08-15 08:31:51 UTC by Muhmaker ♦148 |
| 187467314 (Comments: 1) | Fernanda Moreno (Discussed changesets: 3) | Helllo. Thanks for mapping. Please do not cluster buildings but map them individually. And.... you did not square most buildings here. Hola. Gracias por añadir los edificios al mapa. Por favor, no agrupes los edificios, sin... commented 2026-08-15 08:29:13 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 185997846 (Comments: 2) | Stem (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, J'ai examiné cette rue après un signalement sur le fait que les magasins avaient été incorrectement dessinés… à la place des bâtiments. Nous avons rectifié ce m... commented 2026-08-15 08:19:00 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,020 |
| 166227985 (Comments: 1) | copros (Discussed changesets: 5) | Du kannst ein kurzes Stück Einbahn anlegen, mit oneway=yes und den Ausnahmen als oneway:xxx=no. zB oneway:bicycle=no commented 2026-08-15 08:16:50 UTC by Nielkrokodil ♦112 |
| 187474122 (Comments: 1) | valentina bonora (Discussed changesets: 1) | spostamento di 100 metri di strade intorno santa marta, errore non intenzionale https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187475922 commented 2026-08-15 08:15:35 UTC by Martinligabue ♦56 |
| 187467130 (Comments: 1) | Fernanda Moreno (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected. Best regards. Hola. Gracias por crear el mapa. Por favor, ajusta cada edificio rectangular a una forma cuadrada con la tecla Q mient... commented 2026-08-15 08:10:57 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187383775 (Comments: 2) | Nikofrom94 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour. Bien vu, c'est corrigé. Merci commented 2026-08-15 08:07:11 UTC by Nikofrom94 ♦1 |
| 187452084 (Comments: 1) | Adam Stormguard (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bezpłatny tylko dla gości pozostali 60zl commented 2026-08-15 08:06:30 UTC by Adam Stormguard ♦1 |
| 138119700 (Comments: 1) | Helium314 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Servus, warum hast du die Forststraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365711052 auf "access=private" geändert. Das ist eher fragwürdig, da im Wald inkl. freiem Betretungsrecht und da auch ein Wanderweg drüber füh... commented 2026-08-15 08:06:21 UTC by PPete2 ♦173 |
| 187092487 (Comments: 3) | Murphy1208 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, bitte korrigiere die Punkte, die in den Kommentaren erwähnt werden, bis Ende dieses Wochenendes. Viele Grüße commented 2026-08-15 07:53:39 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 187470067 (Comments: 2) | li zhi0603 (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187475009 commented 2026-08-15 07:51:56 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦596 |
| 187475009 (Comments: 1) | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 (Discussed changesets: 192) | https://revert.osmz.ru/13206 commented 2026-08-15 07:51:35 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦596 |
| 187456375 (Comments: 4) | N129 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, das setzt aber schon voraus, dass der Hydrant millimetergenau auf der Straßenmitte liegt - und selbst dann darf er nicht verklebt werden. Wie schon geschrieben: Im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken. Viele Gr&u... commented 2026-08-15 07:47:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 187255324 (Comments: 1) | RomanKozlov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день, я вынужден откатить ваши правки, так как на карте пик Панорама стоял не на месте по причине того, что не на высшей точке верши... commented 2026-08-15 07:38:03 UTC by Hidden Mountain ♦43 |
| 187450266 (Comments: 1) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 15) | Moin, du hast hier die Ampel entfernt ist das richtig? Nur um das zu erklären - highway=crossing/crossing=traffic_signals sind nur querungen für Fußgänger - Wenn man KFZ Verkehr Ampeln einträgt dann sollte das als ... commented 2026-08-15 07:37:08 UTC by flohoff ♦2,541 |
| 187467920 (Comments: 1) | Selinkartal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, ich habe diesen changeset reverted. Hier kannst du dir den nochmal ansehen: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187467920 Du hast zum einen einen abschnitt der Dolberger Straße unbrauchbar gemacht in dem du alle tags bis a... commented 2026-08-15 07:25:26 UTC by flohoff ♦2,541 |
| 185803929 (Comments: 3) | GiasinIt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao, purtroppo la mia conoscenza della zona è un po arrugginita, fai pure te, però per favore nota che se quella via è diventata doppio senso basta rimuovere il tag oneway=yes dal cavalcavia originale commented 2026-08-15 07:24:50 UTC by giopera ♦28 |
| 186603581 (Comments: 1) | Xeff (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, hattest du dies vor Ort geprüft ? Der Weg wurde bereits vor Jahren im Hinweis als quasi nicht mehr vorhanden gekennzeichnet. Ich war da vor ein paar Tagen am Kuhgehrensattel, dort ist von einem wie hier verzeichneten Pfad absolut ... commented 2026-08-15 07:16:09 UTC by limes11 ♦1,080 |
| 186414299 (Comments: 1) | Sébastien Chopin (Discussed changesets: 34) | Pas de confusion, ça a juste changé : il y avait bien un chemin de ce côté sur les orthophotos de 2020. commented 2026-08-15 07:13:48 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
 | 151054776 (Comments: 1) | melo_1 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, I saw how you mapped the parkings https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280868274/history#map=19/45.822998/24.146127 I just wanted to let you know that likely the whole area should be one amenity=parking and then you could use jsom with th... commented 2026-08-15 07:10:06 UTC by stillhart ♦250 |
 | 184527103 (Comments: 1) | mzve (Discussed changesets: 4) | Good day Why do you attribute these superfluous access attributes to the roads? This is really not needed. Please explain your reasoning for doing this? Kind Regards commented 2026-08-15 07:06:01 UTC by Stephanievanr ♦3 |
| 182821340 (Comments: 1) | MountDamavand (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, I saw your recent edit, have you been onsite? I would like some help to place the tesla supercharger as an area, but I have no new imagery :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14096136070/history commented 2026-08-15 07:05:51 UTC by stillhart ♦250 |
| 158452775 (Comments: 1) | Khathucry (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Khathu Why did you mark this road as private? commented 2026-08-15 07:03:24 UTC by Stephanievanr ♦3 |
| 187473660 (Comments: 1) | Kumar Ghosh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can this be reverted /cancelled please? Can't figure out how to... commented 2026-08-15 07:02:12 UTC by Kumar Ghosh ♦1 |
| 187473596 (Comments: 1) | Justin Hendrick (Discussed changesets: 2) | This commit was accidental. See next commit that deletes this bakery commented 2026-08-15 07:00:14 UTC by Justin Hendrick ♦3 |
| 186331089 (Comments: 1) | Byg_L (Discussed changesets: 2) | Le trottoir est déjà cartographié séparément, dans ce cas il faut conserver `=separate`. J’ai annulé. commented 2026-08-15 06:51:04 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
| 186331067 (Comments: 1) | Byg_L (Discussed changesets: 2) | C’est assez inhabituel comme dispositif dans le coin et les dernières images Panoramax de ce carrefour (datant de deux mois) ne montrent rien y ressemblant. Êtes-vous sûr(e) de cette information ? commented 2026-08-15 06:47:09 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
| 187296521 (Comments: 2) | zweiradfahrer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, wie im Forum jetzt ersichtlich, wurde das durch den anzeigefehler von comaps verursacht. Ich hab nur gesehen, dass die Läden als offen angezeigt wurden und nach der Änderung nicht mehr :D Also gerne die Änderungen zurückrol... commented 2026-08-15 06:11:43 UTC by zweiradfahrer ♦1 |
| 187263089 (Comments: 11) | KIMGGONG2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The attached map from the news article appears to label the southern island (filled in yellow) as a part of Korea and the northern island (filled in white) as a part of China. The map also appears to have used the old terrain from the 1960s, which is... commented 2026-08-15 06:10:56 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦86 |
| 187464455 (Comments: 1) | CG125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21099 commented 2026-08-15 05:35:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 187465536 (Comments: 2) | mylesthemapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not add joke or unverifiable names to OSM. commented 2026-08-15 05:33:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
 | 181033289 (Comments: 2) | Savo25656 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hey, glad to see someone taking an interest in the map situation in Dubica. Feel free to fix anything that looks off. The house numbers are still in the early stages — it's all field data, unfortunately old, not official, so mistakes are d... commented 2026-08-15 05:31:49 UTC by Savo25656 ♦12 |
| 187457416 (Comments: 1) | zangbot485 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the added name(version)s real? commented 2026-08-15 05:27:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187229068 (Comments: 3) | Jul88520 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je vous ai répondu par message. commented 2026-08-15 05:10:40 UTC by LouisXIV ♦43 |
| 187394538 (Comments: 2) | Rewarhad Nurullah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hai FajrAl, terima kasih atas masukannya. Saya akan memperbaikinya. commented 2026-08-15 03:58:25 UTC by Rewarhad Nurullah ♦1 |
| 187450389 (Comments: 1) | netroism (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Is this actually the real "Flock Safety" branded camera or some other surveillance and you just named it Flock as colloquial name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... commented 2026-08-15 03:11:01 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,562 |
| 187469365 (Comments: 1) | IDonutsLG (Discussed changesets: 1) | thats my house you whore commented 2026-08-15 02:43:29 UTC by samburak1 ♦2 |
| 186109399 (Comments: 1) | BerryTrails (Discussed changesets: 8) | I'm little bit confused Are you sure about that? Because both cities has more than 200k population (Parauapebas and Marabá). And the statement is partially incorrect or outdated regarding the current physical reality. The highway conne... commented 2026-08-15 02:40:38 UTC by D3yvison (Ameli3) ♦2 |
| 187468942 (Comments: 1) | BagatelleExcess2887 (Discussed changesets: 1) | source=https://maps.calgary.ca/myproperty/ commented 2026-08-15 02:13:27 UTC by BagatelleExcess2887 ♦1 |
| 184710395 (Comments: 1) | Dblcut3 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Streets in Rosemont around the elementary school are public roads. There is a gate that is attended, but entry is not denied to the general public. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1995/06/23/tiny-rosemont-puts-its-guard-up/ commented 2026-08-15 01:53:13 UTC by JimothyJ ♦1 |
| 187035853 (Comments: 1) | forrestergrouprealestate (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 01:52:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187246292 (Comments: 3) | Ludmila Vacca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revertí este conjunto de cambios por no obtener respuesta al comentario. commented 2026-08-15 01:51:45 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦65 |
| 187466813 (Comments: 1) | Clau96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Podemos cambiar el nombre si no es correcto. Por favor, si podés responder este mensaje con el nombre correcto, o dejar una nota en el mapa. La eliminación del objeto fue revertida. Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, ... commented 2026-08-15 01:41:50 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦65 |
 | 142560394 (Comments: 1) | Lin lung (Discussed changesets: 9) | I'm not sure tourism=attraction on all pins are the correct tag here, got to be replaced commented 2026-08-15 01:36:58 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦409 |
| 187259120 (Comments: 1) | Aszpaszia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! Just wanted to give you a couple quick tips: - opening_hours=* should follow the standardized, specified syntax; see https://osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours for a summary - addr:... commented 2026-08-15 01:27:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187309774 (Comments: 1) | GenioDiabolico (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contributions! Just a quick heads up--your opening_hours=* syntax is otherwise correct, but no trailing `;` needed on the last rule (noticed it on a couple POIs you added). Also, FYI the sta... commented 2026-08-15 01:16:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 184988902 (Comments: 1) | Benton’s Garden and Landscaping Center (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:45:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
 | 184049154 (Comments: 2) | Shafayat Ur Rahaman (Discussed changesets: 9) | I note there are some 288 duplicate buildings in the bit of bangladesh I'm looking at. commented 2026-08-15 00:43:53 UTC by Johnwhelan ♦95 |
| 174576901 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 176863084 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 182942867 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 185002062 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187461629 (Comments: 1) | 500369761 (Discussed changesets: 5) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:36:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187237629 (Comments: 2) | Tom Landlord (Discussed changesets: 2) | Der Name stammt vom Ort Dechsendorf, wo die Straße hinführt und die Brücke wird häufig so genannt, vgl. https://www.google.com/search?q="dechsendorfer+brücke" commented 2026-08-15 00:33:05 UTC by Tom Landlord ♦2 |
| 187461087 (Comments: 1) | Artisius (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-15 00:31:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
 | 187465541 (Comments: 2) | Kulioyo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Furthermore, note that this is OpenStreetMap, a community-developed map of the real world, rather than a business directory platform where you can "claim" your business. No one person has ownership of any given object, but rather the commun... commented 2026-08-15 00:29:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187423946 (Comments: 1) | 500397097 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-15 00:23:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187466306 (Comments: 2) | Heyklif Keeper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it :) I forgot OSM is not Google (for good). Will look at manuals and fix the error. commented 2026-08-14 23:51:48 UTC by Heyklif Keeper ♦2 |
| 187461765 (Comments: 1) | KRLONXOOO (Discussed changesets: 3) | eliminado --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187461765 commented 2026-08-14 23:16:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187462831 (Comments: 2) | Salmonryder (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21098 commented 2026-08-14 23:13:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 187178975 (Comments: 1) | Feuerwehr Himberg (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187465885 den Dressurstall Trauner als Knoten mit leisure=horse_riding eingetragen und die Flächen, die du mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt hattest, habe ich umgetaggt auf landuse=animal... commented 2026-08-14 23:04:09 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦903 |
| 164773929 (Comments: 1) | sheldonelectric (Discussed changesets: 73) | Γιατί η διαγραφή των κόμβων; Και αν θεωρείται σωστή,... commented 2026-08-14 22:59:02 UTC by PeachyOne ♦31 |
| 187371341 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your edit! Please add a more specific changeset comment; this helps mappers in the future to see what you did.' Happy Mapping! commented 2026-08-14 22:42:13 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦30 |
| 187313688 (Comments: 3) | CloudUchiha (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-14 22:39:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187432417 (Comments: 1) | Doitmyself (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Driveways are valid feature that can be included in OSM data. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do no... commented 2026-08-14 22:39:41 UTC by MassCartog ♦457 |
| 187355985 (Comments: 6) | 4thy (Discussed changesets: 1) | > (A lot of Google's information has been added and maintained by volunteers, so I consider it unfair that our own shared information is considered their property) Ah, well unfortunately that's pretty much how any of the proprieta... commented 2026-08-14 22:39:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦294 |
| 187438176 (Comments: 1) | shamuswilkie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2026-08-14 22:30:32 UTC by MassCartog ♦457 |
| 187415067 (Comments: 3) | raffael_de (Discussed changesets: 2) | Great, thanks for confirming! commented 2026-08-14 22:09:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187415367 (Comments: 3) | raffael_de (Discussed changesets: 2) | Great, thanks for confirming! commented 2026-08-14 22:09:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 153363939 (Comments: 2) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 38) | 👋? commented 2026-08-14 21:59:05 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦187 |
| 187456058 (Comments: 2) | N129 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bei bedarf bitte ändern commented 2026-08-14 21:57:55 UTC by N129 ♦3 |
| 153361511 (Comments: 2) | Herwescheluc (Discussed changesets: 38) | 👋? commented 2026-08-14 21:57:26 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦187 |
| 44932308 (Comments: 1) | c94jn3jfa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure the pond in "Lion's Park" is this irregular shape? commented 2026-08-14 21:41:48 UTC by O1S ♦27 |
| 186577666 (Comments: 1) | wurmhaus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey! Welcome to OSM. If you'd like to communicate with the OSM Sheffield community, feel free to join the Matrix chat here https://matrix.to/#/#osm-sheffield:matrix.org commented 2026-08-14 21:33:16 UTC by ntzm ♦68 |
| 187310649 (Comments: 4) | Hungerburg (Discussed changesets: 43) | Wenn bei diesen Auswertern ein Interesse daran besteht derlei Dinge anzuzeigen, dann sollte es ein Leichtes sein sie dazu zu bringen es zu tun. Der Lutz und der Andy Townsend brauchten niemandens Hilfe dafür. Ich hab mir die Sache (mein C... commented 2026-08-14 21:32:23 UTC by Hungerburg ♦423 |
| 178529521 (Comments: 2) | hijs01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. There is no traffic signal on South Atherton next to the former Pizza Hut. Please refrain from naming the sidewalks "side walk" - using 'footway = sidewalk' is enough to mark them as sidewalks. ... commented 2026-08-14 21:27:43 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦61 |
| 187455578 (Comments: 4) | Salmonryder (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dear eerib, Can you clarify whether you go out to the sites and confirm what you post actually exists? Kind regards, Salmonryder commented 2026-08-14 21:25:41 UTC by Salmonryder ♦2 |
| 178589771 (Comments: 1) | vogelfreier (Discussed changesets: 106) | Hi vogelfreier, danke für das Ergänzen der Straßenschlüssel. Mir ist jetzt schon mehrmals in meiner Umgebung aufgefallen, dass du sidewalk=* zu sidewalk:left|right=* änderst. Hat das einen bestimmten Grund? Ich erfass... commented 2026-08-14 21:24:50 UTC by Pfefferminzbonbon ♦3 |
| 185326952 (Comments: 7) | Bierphysik (Discussed changesets: 27) | „Moin Bicyclett, dein Eindruck ist richtig – genau so ist es in der Straße Am Markt aktuell ausgeschildert. Ich hatte vor ca. zwei Jahren irgendetwas im Bereich der B430 angepasst, weil damals einige neue Schilder Gehweg – ... commented 2026-08-14 21:22:23 UTC by puma515 ♦161 |
| 187462970 (Comments: 1) | PottGeograph (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kindertagesstätte Hinzugefügt, Schulgelände Goetheschule Angepasst, Spielplatz im Riegefeld Ergänzt und den Verkehrsberuhigten Bereich Im Nordwesten vom Riegefeld Korrigiert. Müsste Jetzt alles korrekt sein. commented 2026-08-14 21:13:24 UTC by PottGeograph ♦1 |
| 183712577 (Comments: 1) | kDaejungg (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🙏 Thank you very much for the charger. In case you would like to know more about mapping them, here's the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station happy mapping :) commented 2026-08-14 21:09:45 UTC by stillhart ♦250 |
| 187461595 (Comments: 3) | ns130291 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ah thank you for explaining :) Don't worry, the import will probably add it again. commented 2026-08-14 20:57:49 UTC by ceirios ♦137 |
| 175778749 (Comments: 2) | topolusitania (Discussed changesets: 90) | Olá Obrigado pela dúvida. O node foi desenhado para resolver uma nota. Quando lá estive recentemente esqueci-me de verificar commented 2026-08-14 20:55:38 UTC by topolusitania ♦263 |
| 187438680 (Comments: 1) | Keek4600 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Weiterhin doppelt eingetragen commented 2026-08-14 20:49:04 UTC by Bienson ♦634 |
| 184751262 (Comments: 2) | pistepilvi (Discussed changesets: 10) | I updated the building using GRB now. commented 2026-08-14 20:44:22 UTC by pistepilvi ♦5 |
| 177787109 (Comments: 1) | TerraTexGeo (Discussed changesets: 7) | why were speed limits set to such high mph? ex: 148110694, 21223625, 116630814 commented 2026-08-14 20:42:39 UTC by alexanderwoods ♦2 |
| 184192171 (Comments: 1) | Seandebasti (Discussed changesets: 112) | ❤️ thank you for that edit. Just in case you want to learn more about mapping chargers :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station commented 2026-08-14 20:41:01 UTC by stillhart ♦250 |
| 183086738 (Comments: 2) | TerraTexGeo (Discussed changesets: 7) | see 15257503, 15256694, 15257370, 15257368, 15296221, 15257967, 15300298, 15291521, 15351111, 15117255 commented 2026-08-14 20:39:52 UTC by alexanderwoods ♦2 |
 | 185087834 (Comments: 3) | k3019 (Discussed changesets: 8) | feel free to revert then commented 2026-08-14 20:37:34 UTC by Sabering ♦4 |
| 187462628 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 186946486, 187461342, 187461420, 187461474, 187461507. commented 2026-08-14 20:36:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187462633 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 186946486, 187461342, 187461420, 187461474, 187461507. commented 2026-08-14 20:36:38 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187462622 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 186946486, 187461342, 187461420, 187461474, 187461507. commented 2026-08-14 20:36:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187462637 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 186946486, 187461342, 187461420, 187461474, 187461507. commented 2026-08-14 20:36:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187461342 (Comments: 1) | AlexUC (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 187462637, 187462622, 187462633, 187462628 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed & buggy import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21097 commented 2026-08-14 20:36:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187461474 (Comments: 1) | AlexUC (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 187462637, 187462622, 187462633, 187462628 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed & buggy import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21097 commented 2026-08-14 20:36:37 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187461507 (Comments: 1) | AlexUC (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 187462637, 187462622, 187462633, 187462628 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed & buggy import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21097 commented 2026-08-14 20:36:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187461420 (Comments: 1) | AlexUC (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 187462637, 187462622, 187462633, 187462628 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed & buggy import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21097 commented 2026-08-14 20:36:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 186946486 (Comments: 1) | AlexUC (Discussed changesets: 5) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 187462637, 187462622, 187462633, 187462628 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed & buggy import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21097 commented 2026-08-14 20:36:36 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 179908954 (Comments: 1) | Ondrej Jób (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is no traffic sign forbidding pedestrians on these roads. Yes, it is inconvenient and dangerous for them, but it is not forbidden. Please do not make up data. The tag foot=use_sidepath was correct, meaning it is not forbidden for pedestrians, b... commented 2026-08-14 20:35:14 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,996 |
| 186137291 (Comments: 1) | ThomAsterix (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pourquoi avoir retiré access=private sur way/1423499215 ? C’est assez clairement une piscine privée. Pourquoi avoir retiré highway=milestone des bornes de la voie de la Liberté ? Comme le montrent les phot... commented 2026-08-14 20:16:05 UTC by Ltrlg ♦234 |
| X | 187108619 (Comments: 2) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 204) | You're welcome. commented 2026-08-14 20:12:24 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦444 |
| 187109206 (Comments: 2) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 204) | You're welcome. commented 2026-08-14 20:12:08 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦444 |
| 187405180 (Comments: 1) | Paderadler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Paderradler, vielen Dank für Deinen ersten Edit bei OpenStreetMap. Von Menschen wie uns, die mit Ortskenntnissen die Augen offen haben, lebt das Projekt. Zu Deinen Änderungen ein paar Anmerkungen: Der geänder... commented 2026-08-14 20:09:14 UTC by bielebog ♦291 |
| 187460000 (Comments: 10) | Thulinma (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aanrader JOSM: ID heb ik nooit willen gebruiken. Ben ooit met Potlatch1 begonnen. editor josm stap voor stap https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 Deze editor lijkt even lastig in het begin. |
| 187460596 (Comments: 6) | Thulinma (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het ook typisch OSM Nederland. Alle adresnodes zijn import vanuit de BAG..Kadaster. Die gebruiken we voor bedrijven. Hier had ik het bedrijf samengevoegd. commented 2026-08-14 19:54:04 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187444702 (Comments: 4) | Salmonryder (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dear Eerib, You're photos are out of date. I can assure you there are no flags in the forest along this alignment. Kind regards, Salmonryder commented 2026-08-14 19:47:02 UTC by Salmonryder ♦2 |
 | 187387506 (Comments: 3) | gwythyr622 (Discussed changesets: 11) | nem para, javítom én is ha van, úgyse tudok egyelőre felméréssel hozzá járulni. commented 2026-08-14 19:45:39 UTC by vasony ♦590 |
| 178884537 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 75) | I think the ones the city put up are all gone now. commented 2026-08-14 19:28:31 UTC by Natfoot ♦128 |
| 187155735 (Comments: 1) | nroeguns (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá! Agradeço a sua edição no município de Santos. Vi que você mudou o nome de uma via, no entanto, o nome anterior estava correto: Alameda Armênio Mendes (vide https://leis.org/municipais/sp/santos/lei/... commented 2026-08-14 19:25:32 UTC by themapsplayer ♦2 |
| 182495596 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 75) | this is so inappropriate. commented 2026-08-14 19:23:52 UTC by Natfoot ♦128 |
| 187422513 (Comments: 11) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 58) | Already explained many times: One image says itself that it's from another way, the other one had an invalid ID and wasn't displayable commented 2026-08-14 19:17:48 UTC by Makeena ♦74 |
| 187455249 (Comments: 1) | Dezza (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thanks for surveying this! commented 2026-08-14 19:15:39 UTC by lakedistrict ♦333 |
| 187044128 (Comments: 1) | velomalopolska (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hej, jak wygląda obecnie ta budowa? Wydaje mi się, że skoro jest to budowa, to nie ma tam obecnie wstępu, więc bicycle=designated i foot=yes są błędne. Takie dostępy będą dopiero, gdy wybudują i będą odpowiednie znaki. I zgaduję, ż... commented 2026-08-14 19:12:33 UTC by YomanNH ♦516 |
| 178495513 (Comments: 1) | adamos (Discussed changesets: 70) | Brosky, proč tam není ani zdroj ani použitý podklad? Podle čeho jsi to kreslil? commented 2026-08-14 19:06:02 UTC by Ondřej Lopatka ♦33 |
| 187442716 (Comments: 1) | Aquila70 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia Aquila70! Ezt a McDonald's POI-t már tegnap hozzáadtam, amikor is az általad bejelentett Piac u. 53. szám alatti régi McDonald's-ot levettem :) Lásd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1... commented 2026-08-14 19:01:07 UTC by 'Lex ♦2 |
| 187389915 (Comments: 1) | JMJB (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ahoj, odkud čerpáš informace ohledně přetagování silniční sítě? Díky Vojta commented 2026-08-14 18:55:39 UTC by Dvorný ♦42 |
| 187389213 (Comments: 1) | JMJB (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ahoj, odkud čerpáš informace ohledně přetagování silniční sítě? Díky Vojta commented 2026-08-14 18:55:32 UTC by Dvorný ♦42 |
| 187390822 (Comments: 1) | JMJB (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ahoj, odkud čerpáš informace ohledně přetagování silniční sítě? Díky Vojta commented 2026-08-14 18:55:21 UTC by Dvorný ♦42 |
| 187405198 (Comments: 1) | Shigosu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Links zu Internetauftritten sollen genau dem Objekt verweisen und nicht zu irgendwelchen allgemeinen Websites. commented 2026-08-14 18:51:03 UTC by Protoxenus ♦335 |
| 182155549 (Comments: 2) | itineris (Discussed changesets: 76) | Kösz, hogy észrevetted. Én csak régóta tervezem, de még nem üzemeltem be ellenőrzést. Hagytam üzenetet a delikvensnek; meglátjuk, mit reagál. commented 2026-08-14 18:35:50 UTC by itineris ♦430 |
| 187364538 (Comments: 1) | itamas80 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Szia! Nem tudom, milyen motivációból és milyen forrás alapján húztad arrébb az Újpest-Központnál található aluljáró-korlátokat. Ug... commented 2026-08-14 18:35:00 UTC by itineris ♦430 |
| 109668472 (Comments: 2) | frbg (Discussed changesets: 7) | Gute Frage nach den Jahren. Ich kann tatsächlich auch gerade nur Sträßel finden. Der Teil an Großdrebnitz wurde schon vorher als Lauterbacher Sträßel bezeichnet. Da die Straße durchgängig ist, gehe ich mal ... commented 2026-08-14 18:34:11 UTC by frbg ♦9 |
| 187456333 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 100) | Discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187455578 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187444702 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187414255 commented 2026-08-14 18:15:20 UTC by eerib ♦370 |
| 177763490 (Comments: 1) | bieszczad (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ta ścieżka istnieje? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307331138 commented 2026-08-14 18:07:45 UTC by VA00 ♦651 |
| 187373961 (Comments: 2) | Mattu73 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Czołem, odcinek way/1427358420 to droga dla rowerów, piesi mają ewentualny dostęp. gdyż "nie ma chodnika" akurat w tym kierunku. commented 2026-08-14 18:03:56 UTC by Mattu73 ♦3 |
| 187356941 (Comments: 2) | VA00 (Discussed changesets: 150) | Na tablicach pisze "pieszo-rowerowy", ale oznakowanie jest jak rowerowego, podobnie jak typowe użycie. Ktoś wstawił tag szlaku pieszego przez pomyłkę tworząc relację. commented 2026-08-14 18:02:05 UTC by VA00 ♦651 |
| 187429307 (Comments: 1) | Own Oh (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hi, You seem to have deleted the landuses completely. :) Revert? commented 2026-08-14 18:01:49 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 187265525 (Comments: 1) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 514) | Bonsoir, Merci pour la contribution. Je contribue pas mal sur les commerces et suis les changements. J'ai besoin d'une confirmation si vous avez toujours contact avec le client "Start People". J'ai cherch&... commented 2026-08-14 17:54:00 UTC by Cayenne17 ♦37 |
 | 187443973 (Comments: 1) | Fredostar10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fredostar10, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping. It will be nice to see more features mapped around here, Every Door is a great mobile app for mapping https://every-door.app/ Happy Mapping! commented 2026-08-14 17:38:50 UTC by Enock4seth ♦657 |
| 187399481 (Comments: 2) | webfil (Discussed changesets: 24) | The main issue is that a lot of apps and routing engines update their network data only evey week or evey month (and in some time even more, several months, or one year), so this will make routing obsolete for this part of the A40 for several months,... commented 2026-08-14 17:23:02 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦525 |
| 187451808 (Comments: 2) | Waldamsel (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thanks for the heads-up. I had overlooked the impact on the multipolygon. I have removed the WikiMediaCommonsTag again. commented 2026-08-14 17:22:31 UTC by Waldamsel ♦12 |
| 186804846 (Comments: 4) | BlauesFahrrad (Discussed changesets: 4) | Danke für die schnelle Antwort und die nachgereichte Quelle. Bei so langen Sachen ist es in der Tat sinnvoll das entsprechend anzupassen. In der Quelle des einen changesets (die DB Seite) stand eben nur was vom Parkplatz direkt am Bahnhof Bad... commented 2026-08-14 17:15:10 UTC by onterof ♦53 |
| 183616101 (Comments: 2) | LakeTana (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi rhhs, Thank you for the information about the roundabout modeling, and I appreciate you making the edits. I wasn’t able to confirm whether this was a roundabout junction because I couldn’t verify the right-of-way signage from the av... commented 2026-08-14 17:13:17 UTC by LakeTana ♦19 |
| 187427879 (Comments: 2) | Dominik Dachs (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hab noch mal vor Ort nachgeschaut. Man kann auf beiden Fahrbahnen an der Verkehrsinsel vorbei fahren. Foto: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/9xxttcxa6rslil2lavp0m/IMG_5135.jpeg?rlkey=0sykjq2jxojxyplik2dn6c01z commented 2026-08-14 17:10:53 UTC by kadiwa ♦117 |
| 187449029 (Comments: 1) | Argusto_SAS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nochmal hallo! Auch hier die Bitte beim (nötigen) Ändern die de: Seite zu bevorzugen! Grüße Andreas commented 2026-08-14 17:03:45 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦187 |
| 187445021 (Comments: 1) | Argusto_SAS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo, Argusto_SAS, auch hier! Hier frage ich mich, warum Du bei brand:wikipedia nicht den deutschen Wikipediaartikel verlinkst. Das in Wikidata nur zu en:Aldi verlinkt ist, liegt daran, dass dort bei Aldi (Q125054) bereits die de:wikipedia-Se... commented 2026-08-14 17:00:03 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦187 |
| 187439454 (Comments: 2) | xenon_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dziękuję za dokładny opis i szybką odpowiedź, fajnie że edytor iD ma tak dużo możliwości a jednocześnie jest dosyć prosty w użyciu. Jestem chętny do dalszego edytowania! commented 2026-08-14 16:58:03 UTC by xenon_ ♦3 |
| 181358607 (Comments: 2) | Istvan Kasler (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Istvan Kasler, darf ich einmal fragen für welche Anwendung du hier das Routing für Busse optimieren wolltest? Du hast dabei leider die Straße für alle anderen Verkehrsteilnehmer gesperrt. Für Busse ergaben sich dar... commented 2026-08-14 16:56:47 UTC by Muhmaker ♦148 |
| 187452878 (Comments: 3) | SolnyshkoFirmware (Discussed changesets: 1) | Нашёл ещё более ранние упоминания: https://vk.ru/wall-156437191_7826, https://vk.ru/wall-156437191_7210, https://vk.ru/wall-156437191_6692. commented 2026-08-14 16:56:36 UTC by SolnyshkoFirmware ♦1 |
| 147241695 (Comments: 2) | Mirecnet (Discussed changesets: 150) | #mapycom user report #m403114 - BTS opravené commented 2026-08-14 16:52:24 UTC by Filip009CZ ♦49 |
| 184797191 (Comments: 1) | PengualaHeadphones (Discussed changesets: 23) | Some of the added barangay boundaries seem to conflict with previously mapped city boundaries, e.g. Pulung Bulu (relation/21044450) has a large overlap with Angeles. Both the changesets that added Angeles/San Fernando boundary as well as your... commented 2026-08-14 16:51:39 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦190 |
| 187383296 (Comments: 2) | xenon_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | Okej, dziękuję za podpowiedź, jestem nowy i nie za bardzo jeszcze ogarniam tagi :( commented 2026-08-14 16:51:06 UTC by xenon_ ♦3 |
| 133515997 (Comments: 3) | murble (Discussed changesets: 20) | I've changed it to the Hindi you supplied, on osm.org/changeset/187453639. commented 2026-08-14 16:49:47 UTC by Paul Berry ♦141 |
| 187447272 (Comments: 2) | Argusto_SAS (Discussed changesets: 3) | (Meine Frage bezieht sich auch auf all die anderen Penny-Änderungen!) commented 2026-08-14 16:46:55 UTC by Herwescheluc ♦187 |
 | 187437957 (Comments: 2) | Deary74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | کاک دیاری ئێرە جێی شتی تایبەت نییە. ئەگەر پێویستت بەوەیە کە بەردەوام لەسەر نەخشە بێت لەناو بەرنامەی (Mapswithme) دەتانی ئەو شتە بکەی و بێ ئەوەی ... commented 2026-08-14 16:38:27 UTC by ڕاستی ♦85 |
| 187421397 (Comments: 1) | Serafin Informática e Soluções Tecnológicas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Favor adicionar limite de velocidade na edição irá ajudar na precisão. commented 2026-08-14 16:33:50 UTC by Cleverson Cândido ♦6 |
| 187452599 (Comments: 1) | KarlBani (Discussed changesets: 2) | http://www.mypennines.co.uk/west-pennine-moors/summits/hog-lowe-pike.html gives a nice description and photos commented 2026-08-14 16:27:45 UTC by KarlBani ♦2 |
| 170332817 (Comments: 4) | olecky (Discussed changesets: 17) | Oh thanks! I will look at it commented 2026-08-14 16:25:03 UTC by Sylvain DNS ♦1 |
| 187451107 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 100) | Discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187444702 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187414255 commented 2026-08-14 16:23:53 UTC by eerib ♦370 |
| 187431933 (Comments: 3) | Gen_Gavi (Discussed changesets: 20) | Merci pour la correction :) commented 2026-08-14 16:23:44 UTC by Syl ♦1,085 |
| 187394639 (Comments: 4) | PatGT (Discussed changesets: 11) | An then he keeps saying vandalism? What’s wrong with this guy. It’s not vandalism. commented 2026-08-14 16:18:55 UTC by PatGT ♦7 |
| 187428089 (Comments: 1) | FraViMar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola FraViMar, consulta a que se debe la modificación de ubicación del punto de referencia del Barrio El Carmen a un lugar lejos del barrio? commented 2026-08-14 16:11:25 UTC by serock ♦82 |
| 187443420 (Comments: 1) | JMJB (Discussed changesets: 16) | If it's trunk, but not restricted access, there should probably be motorroad=no, else data consumers (routing?) will assume motorway. (Access, toll, speed) commented 2026-08-14 16:08:23 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
| 187020580 (Comments: 3) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi dknelson9876, thank you for reaching out. Based on the resources available to me, I updated the roads where I could confidently determine that the construction had been completed and changed them to highway=residential. But it was accidental to re... commented 2026-08-14 16:06:56 UTC by Gorger ♦57 |
| 150617665 (Comments: 2) | CloudUchiha (Discussed changesets: 3) | Grazie della correzione commented 2026-08-14 16:03:01 UTC by CloudUchiha ♦3 |
| 153087136 (Comments: 2) | CloudUchiha (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao, no, ho cercato adesso di correggere, grazie commented 2026-08-14 15:59:38 UTC by CloudUchiha ♦3 |
| 187380649 (Comments: 4) | Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 190) | Bitte cycleway:surface und footway:surface (mit dem richtigen Wert) erfassen, nicht nur surface=*. Bei getrennten Wegen für Fußgänger und Radfahrer fragt nämlich SC beide Oberflächen separat ab. Auch dann, wenn surface=* sch... commented 2026-08-14 15:58:17 UTC by george1201 ♦324 |
| 187380427 (Comments: 1) | Simon Pickstone (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is a cycle lane there, it's a contra flow cycle lane commented 2026-08-14 15:57:08 UTC by RaccoonFederation ♦98 |
| 187288685 (Comments: 3) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi Udarian, I overlooked the history and missed the turn restriction during my review. Thank you for your kind words and for pointing it out. I'll be more cautious in my future edits. commented 2026-08-14 15:53:14 UTC by Ky_AT ♦23 |
| 184791760 (Comments: 1) | MD Mostakin Islam Mim (Discussed changesets: 3) | way 153351229 appears to duplicate another building imported from microsoftbuilding foot prints commented 2026-08-14 15:50:39 UTC by Johnwhelan ♦95 |
| 187288853 (Comments: 3) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi Udar, thank you for reverting the changeset, and thank you for your explanation here. I’ll be more aware of cross-connectivity without entering the roundabout in my future edits. commented 2026-08-14 15:49:06 UTC by Ky_AT ♦23 |
| 187442745 (Comments: 2) | Rogoyski (Discussed changesets: 73) | Do poziomów mostu odnosi się ewentualnie tag level. layer=* to abstrakcyjne określenie *względnej* kolejności obiektów w osi pionowej. Nie umiałem odnieść tej koncepcji do struktury rozciągającej się pomiędzy layer=1 ... commented 2026-08-14 15:47:53 UTC by Rogoyski ♦266 |
| 155283551 (Comments: 2) | markbeech (Discussed changesets: 3) | I suspect it should have been - now corrected. commented 2026-08-14 15:41:56 UTC by markbeech ♦3 |
| 187447924 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 39) | phone numbers are usually formatted (in the US) +1-XXX-XXX-XXXX , this changeset changed a phone number that was almost correct to less correct by removing multiple `-`'s. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-14 15:37:31 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187434705 (Comments: 1) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Може да има още :) Не разбирам особено от дамска козметика commented 2026-08-14 15:36:48 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 186463264 (Comments: 2) | PatGT (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi woodpeck. Not sure how that happened. Must have changed by mistake. commented 2026-08-14 15:29:12 UTC by PatGT ♦7 |
| 185079624 (Comments: 1) | Veganarchocommunist (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I've changed zero-waste to 'yes'. The * in a tag description is a placeholder for a value such as yes,no,(text) or somevalue commented 2026-08-14 15:24:19 UTC by TonyS999 ♦20 |
| 187360493 (Comments: 2) | prostitutka (Discussed changesets: 8) | Напишите ещё, пожалуйста, зачем вы разбиваете здания на две линии и обозначаете их отношением? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21222286 commented 2026-08-14 15:24:15 UTC by mavl ♦77,092 |
| 187431489 (Comments: 4) | CasGroenigen (Discussed changesets: 63) | Bedankt voor de uitleg! commented 2026-08-14 15:14:59 UTC by CasGroenigen ♦48 |
 | 62318492 (Comments: 2) | Ernst Poulsen (Discussed changesets: 35) | Jeg har flyttet way/214250324 til øst for vandløbet. commented 2026-08-14 15:09:25 UTC by cyclist789 ♦95 |
| 187436407 (Comments: 1) | Gen_Gavi (Discussed changesets: 20) | Trop rapide, merci ! commented 2026-08-14 14:57:28 UTC by Lejun ♦526 |
| 186439479 (Comments: 1) | LuvuaRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Didn't the addition of the "one-way" sign make the stop sign signage inconsistent? commented 2026-08-14 14:53:39 UTC by Fidelis Assis ♦54 |
| 184221761 (Comments: 2) | Armire (Discussed changesets: 19) | T'as l'air d'être en vacances (bonnes j'espère ?), j'ai corrigé commented 2026-08-14 14:52:50 UTC by Yunan973 ♦149 |
| 187393408 (Comments: 10) | YouKnow (Discussed changesets: 7) | Die zijn er echt wel. Het beeld dat je ziet is vaak het oude beeld. Dus cache leegmaken met CTRL-F5 of een beetje in en uitzoomen. In de editmodus zie je ze wel. De ' sat foto' die je gebruikt is eigenlijk een luchtfoto. Ik gebruik daar... commented 2026-08-14 14:49:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187429254 (Comments: 2) | kaartjesman (Discussed changesets: 7) | dank! commented 2026-08-14 14:47:09 UTC by kaartjesman ♦7 |
| 187434663 (Comments: 1) | ФОРМУЛА АВТОРАДИО (Discussed changesets: 0) | и что это за банк на парковке? commented 2026-08-14 14:32:21 UTC by literan ♦7,196 |
| 187441885 (Comments: 2) | Lunar Shows (Discussed changesets: 1) | Info verplaatst naar adresnode... commented 2026-08-14 14:24:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 129571120 (Comments: 7) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 253) | Ja tutaj dodawałem railway=signal_box - wiem że to nie wszystko, ale krok w dobrym kierunku :D commented 2026-08-14 14:22:46 UTC by kubahahaha ♦491 |
| 187429765 (Comments: 5) | Zee1684 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Aman kok, itu hanya saran saja, kalau pengaturannya jadi bahasa Indonesia, labelnya akan lebih mudah dicari commented 2026-08-14 14:20:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187360995 (Comments: 1) | DaryaSea (Discussed changesets: 11) | Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite. commented 2026-08-14 14:12:28 UTC by DaryaSea ♦9 |
| 187383062 (Comments: 4) | Dikkie Dik (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hoi.. De hoofdfunctie blijft bakker denk ik. Groet, eggie commented 2026-08-14 14:01:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187022471 (Comments: 1) | iso-lator (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352687025 Czy to jest CPR, czy zwykły chodnik? Jeśli to pierwsze to powinno być highway=path, jeśli to drugie to należ usunąć tagi powiązane z CPR. commented 2026-08-14 13:53:43 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 186688278 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 3) | Improved road connectivity based on Bing Maps Aerial #mapbox_missing_roads commented 2026-08-14 13:52:07 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦3 |
| 181001494 (Comments: 3) | ludwich (Discussed changesets: 10) | Super, vielen Dank ! commented 2026-08-14 13:51:11 UTC by Strubbl ♦609 |
| 187372544 (Comments: 1) | BJPB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Niestety tutaj to samo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187372170#c1644144 commented 2026-08-14 13:47:54 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 186268334 (Comments: 1) | Otlot7 iejsisih (Discussed changesets: 3) | Revertida mudança pois está fechado essa entrada Por favor ver a nota que está no mapa. commented 2026-08-14 13:45:07 UTC by eduardoaddad ♦11 |
| 187372170 (Comments: 1) | BJPB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cześć, niestety ale te zmiany wyglądają na niepoprawne. W jezdni widoczne są pasy rowerowe, a nie ciągi pieszo-rowerowe. Te oznaczamy tagami w linii jezdni, co też było już zmapowane jako cycleway:both=lane. Zachęcam do zap... commented 2026-08-14 13:44:46 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
 | 187434053 (Comments: 1) | soshial (Discussed changesets: 17) | Fixed `network` tag everywhere to `KG:national` (correct value) commented 2026-08-14 13:42:58 UTC by soshial ♦45 |
| 184986465 (Comments: 1) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 253) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13983576120 Dopiero co dodany prawidłowo i już zniknął :P commented 2026-08-14 13:37:50 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦932 |
| 187375982 (Comments: 1) | Edycja (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396027219 To jest ciąg pieszo-rowerowy, czy chodnik? Jeśli CPR to powinno być highway=path i warto dodać segregated=* jeśli chodnik to należy usunąć tagi bicycle=* i foot=* commented 2026-08-14 13:36:09 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 187443326 (Comments: 1) | mottiger (Discussed changesets: 27) | this was a highway=crossing and not parking commented 2026-08-14 13:35:30 UTC by mottiger ♦48 |
| 187431205 (Comments: 1) | Adam Stormguard (Discussed changesets: 2) | To ciąg pieszo-rowerowy, czy zwykły chodnik? commented 2026-08-14 13:31:58 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 170779980 (Comments: 1) | Qinyile (Discussed changesets: 2) | 似乎误删了一条盐田的公路，是由于卫星影像没有更新吗？ commented 2026-08-14 13:28:40 UTC by qgmzmy ♦7 |
| 187250604 (Comments: 5) | xx yyy19 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello xx, If you are using privately acquired imagery or publicly available imagery, please make sure that the the terms of use allow its use as a source for OSM. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vertical_Aerial_Photographs for d... commented 2026-08-14 13:28:21 UTC by zstadler ♦1,149 |
| 187231252 (Comments: 4) | OneOSMUser (Discussed changesets: 1) | As discussed in other changesets, you have now added a correct image and clarified the mistakes that happened here. If you want, you could even add the obstacle again now. (But not the image by stillhart obviously as it's showing a different ... commented 2026-08-14 13:28:08 UTC by Makeena ♦74 |
| 59106516 (Comments: 2) | Andreas Binder (Discussed changesets: 97) | No problem :-) commented 2026-08-14 13:24:34 UTC by Andreas Binder ♦262 |
| 184700737 (Comments: 30) | FDMS4 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I never tagged it as ground, it always used to be grass. The fact you didn't walk the path but still changed the attributes added by someone who (which you also have to assume) has actually walked the complete path, is problematic. If you just p... commented 2026-08-14 13:20:43 UTC by Makeena ♦74 |
| 187441045 (Comments: 1) | TrickyFoxy (Discussed changesets: 61) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-14 13:13:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187003932 (Comments: 2) | brainrot1111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Concordo, e foi por isso que o changeset 183084690 do usuário Estuks foi desfeito pouco tempo atrás. A população de Curatis - 546 habitantes - não é suficiente para enquadrá-la na regra 4.1 do sistema ... commented 2026-08-14 13:10:39 UTC by ftrebien ♦244 |
| 187434866 (Comments: 2) | Wolli2004 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ach ja - ich bin auf die changesets gekommen weil ich das routing in der gegend "Überwache" und mir alles angucke wo sich was verändert: Das war eine routing änderung - Rot alt - Grün neu ... https://osm.zz... commented 2026-08-14 13:04:22 UTC by flohoff ♦2,541 |
| 184489490 (Comments: 2) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 253) | Magic Earth tak, Organic Maps/CoMaps nie, inne nie wiem commented 2026-08-14 12:59:53 UTC by kubahahaha ♦491 |
| 187441096 (Comments: 1) | addr: (Discussed changesets: 36) | В этой правке в результате выделения поиском, были затронуты полигоны landuse=forest, измененные на natural=wood. После визуальной проверки, в след... commented 2026-08-14 12:58:55 UTC by addr: ♦34 |
| 187374645 (Comments: 2) | Scandinavian101 (Discussed changesets: 2) | A tak, sam chciałem więcej znaleźć i nie ma za bardzo. Plac budowy już fizycznie jest i rozpoczęli kopanie fundamentów, ale jakakolwiek wzmianka jest chyba tylko na google mapsach Dzięki za radę, zapamiętam sobie. Przestraszył... commented 2026-08-14 12:58:31 UTC by Scandinavian101 ♦1 |
| 187074198 (Comments: 3) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 253) | 1. Thanks for pointing it out, I apparently forgot to remove some temporary tags I used in JOSM filters while working on that changeset. I removed all X-SANTANDER=true tags from database. 2. Na forum rozmawialiśmy o tej edycji już od kilku m... commented 2026-08-14 12:57:40 UTC by kubahahaha ♦491 |
| 187415185 (Comments: 1) | edgardoo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. Por favor cuidado con mover todo de acuerdo a lo que observa en una sola foto atelital. Las fotos son bastante circunstanciales. Pero en caso que decida hacerlo, mover todo, no solo una parte. saludos --- ... commented 2026-08-14 12:55:57 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 167090861 (Comments: 1) | nanzop (Discussed changesets: 35) | Tej drogi rowerowej nie ma na prawie całym odcinku, a na początku od Włoszakowice jest po drugiej stronie, skąd to masz? commented 2026-08-14 12:54:55 UTC by db-ak ♦82 |
| 187417516 (Comments: 2) | HerryCFPL (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm very sorry – I'm out at the moment. I'll take care of it right after I get back. commented 2026-08-14 12:53:52 UTC by HerryCFPL ♦11 |
| 187039837 (Comments: 2) | TraumRa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, meine Informationen stammen nur aus den Satellitenbildern. Wenn du aktuellere Informationen vor Ort hast, kannst du das gerne wieder rauslöschen bzw. aktualisieren. Oder schreib es hier in die Diskussion, dann nehme ich es wieder... commented 2026-08-14 12:48:26 UTC by TraumRa ♦6 |
| 183493069 (Comments: 2) | suvorov_su (Discussed changesets: 1) | fixed commented 2026-08-14 12:47:57 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 187421536 (Comments: 5) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Или да си измислиш ти някаква стойност(май имаме такова право). commented 2026-08-14 12:46:58 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| X | 140258388 (Comments: 1) | mga_geo (Discussed changesets: 88) | Bonjour, J'ai l'impression que tu as ajouté des arrêts de bus à l'aveuglette, sans vérifier sur place. Si c'est le cas, ajouter un fixme du genre "fixme=à vérifier sur place"... commented 2026-08-14 12:43:06 UTC by josmougn ♦272 |
| 187433607 (Comments: 1) | Maxim Madiun (Discussed changesets: 1) | sebaiknya jangan dihapus; jika dilihat ini jalur setapak, jadi ubah saja tagnya jadi jalan setapak commented 2026-08-14 12:42:54 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 181526048 (Comments: 4) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 181) | Esos límites son útiles porque a veces hay restricciones de accesopara vehículos y personas a pie, por ejemplo, cuando hay un mal temporal (tormentas). Por favor, deberían de recuperarse. commented 2026-08-14 12:37:38 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,855 |
| 187439205 (Comments: 3) | Jeroen OSM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Yep.. soms hebben ze daadwerkelijk een naam. Dat zijn dan meestal een boel laadpalen bij elkaar. commented 2026-08-14 12:35:49 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187439611 (Comments: 1) | fDWgb (Discussed changesets: 3) | Address label on the building: Wieser-Wald Nr. 1 commented 2026-08-14 12:29:14 UTC by fDWgb ♦1 |
| 187405981 (Comments: 1) | johnny-park (Discussed changesets: 12) | way/266015279: tracktype=DE:240,1026-36 commented 2026-08-14 12:27:59 UTC by FroschForscher ♦167 |
| 187423419 (Comments: 2) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Оправено. Проблемът е, че ползвам някакъв pdf с информация №ЛЗ, име, адрес, който е от 2022. Някои са закрили оттогава, та за всеки случай п... commented 2026-08-14 12:25:38 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦59 |
| 154909640 (Comments: 1) | BertPasch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo BertPasch, bitte sieh doch davon ab, solche Changesets bei OSM hochzuladen. Grundsätzlich werden Wege unabhängig von Zugangsbeschränkungen gemappt. Sollte der Zugang zu einzelnen Wegen im Wald tatsächlich aufgrund der... commented 2026-08-14 12:19:02 UTC by Pfefferminzbonbon ♦3 |
| 187380823 (Comments: 1) | seopinnacleagency (Discussed changesets: 17) | Again this addition is full of mistakes. Please note these and create an internal guidebook for adding your clients' businesses on OSM. 1. Please check when adding the business if there wasn't a business at the same location that's ... commented 2026-08-14 12:18:54 UTC by rhhs ♦233 |
| 187320727 (Comments: 1) | Faniya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187439243 commented 2026-08-14 12:15:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187438641 (Comments: 1) | Srijnders29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. Ik heb de info samengevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-14 12:11:59 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187436229 (Comments: 3) | MAG243 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thx, voor het advies. commented 2026-08-14 12:10:50 UTC by MAG243 ♦1 |
| 187366218 (Comments: 4) | SambalPecelMadiun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Blokirnya hanya sementara. Tidak perlu menonaktifkan aplikasinya, bisa logout akun dari Comapsnya saja sudah cukup. Untuk aplikasi Comaps ini tunggu saja hingga ada pembaruan aplikasi selanjutnya, kemudian bisa login kembali. Harap mengaktifka... commented 2026-08-14 12:02:20 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 183308724 (Comments: 3) | Champi67 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The statement that the unit is optional does not mean that you can simply remove it when someone else decided to add it for additional clarification. It means that you don't have to add the unit when you are adding a height tag in meters. The fu... commented 2026-08-14 12:00:27 UTC by Makeena ♦74 |
 | 186834008 (Comments: 1) | Deadpool98765 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. When you comes across highways to map or check the existing width, decide which tag is appropriate. How to find the width of a trace: Measuring Road Width in iD Editor To accurately measure the width of a road in the iD editor, fo... commented 2026-08-14 11:54:58 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187364969 (Comments: 4) | NieWnen (Discussed changesets: 173) | Co rozumiesz przez odseparowany? Jeśli jest to kwestia nawierzchni, to nie ma to znaczenia w kontekście OSM. Liczy się to jako jeden ciąg. A do określenia tego, czy jest podział na część rowerową/pieszą służy tag segregated=*. |
| 187422308 (Comments: 2) | SambalPecelMadiun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Malam. Saya sudah melakukan “?eclear” dan menonaktifkan akun saya dari CoMaps agar kejadian ini tidak terulang lagi. Apakah Anda bisa memonitor akun saya, bilamana bug ini masih terjadi? Terima kasih, dan saya minta maaf sebesar-bes... commented 2026-08-14 11:45:53 UTC by SambalPecelMadiun ♦3 |
| X | 187341365 (Comments: 2) | API_SIS67_FME (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187437351 commented 2026-08-14 11:41:24 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187409886 (Comments: 1) | JeanSebastien (Discussed changesets: 4) | OSMcha signale cette modification comme "mass modification". En réalité j'ai passé plus de 2h en me déplaçant à vélo pour contrôler. --- ... commented 2026-08-14 11:40:04 UTC by JeanSebastien ♦8 |
| 187434993 (Comments: 3) | Mrbird7753 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for confirming that the name is real. My concern is not whether the name is genuine, but what real-world feature this node represents. place=neighbourhood is intended for a named geographic neighbourhood within a settlement. Your... commented 2026-08-14 11:37:06 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187434875 (Comments: 3) | Mrbird7753 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for confirming. The issue isn't only whether the name is real: place=neighbourhood is for a named part of a settlement, not an individual home. Please don't put a resident's name/address/road description into nam... commented 2026-08-14 11:35:37 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187435907 (Comments: 4) | MAG243 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Deze link werkt hopelijk wel https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18.0/52.146/5.2786 commented 2026-08-14 11:34:35 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187326447 (Comments: 1) | LolaBell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187436801 commented 2026-08-14 11:30:38 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187431674 (Comments: 1) | trackmap (Discussed changesets: 7) | Is this kind of tagging really merited for a temporary feature? This is being built and taken down again in the course of one month commented 2026-08-14 11:14:13 UTC by willkmis ♦225 |
| 187429295 (Comments: 8) | Arthur1092 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dank voor de ondersteuning! Weer wat geleerd, fijn weekend. commented 2026-08-14 11:10:08 UTC by Arthur1092 ♦1 |
| 187435523 (Comments: 1) | Yowie Sightings (Discussed changesets: 1) | hospital* commented 2026-08-14 11:02:44 UTC by Yowie Sightings ♦1 |
| 187427951 (Comments: 4) | Alex_mappt (Discussed changesets: 4) | Then go ahead. commented 2026-08-14 11:01:31 UTC by Alex_mappt ♦1 |
| 113782671 (Comments: 1) | Toscana87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Do you have any information about Hippi tanya 1 and 2? Are they still there? commented 2026-08-14 10:56:48 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 187429261 (Comments: 3) | paliczp5333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Köszönöm szépen! Ez volt az első, figyelni fogok jobban! commented 2026-08-14 10:52:28 UTC by paliczp5333 ♦1 |
 | 187432975 (Comments: 1) | JuriJK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Why did you rename some islands? Furthermore, may we know the source of your added names? Thanks. commented 2026-08-14 10:50:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 123102884 (Comments: 3) | FoeNyx (Discussed changesets: 14) | That would be hgv=private, I think commented 2026-08-14 10:37:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187427912 (Comments: 2) | CollinsNdegwa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi. I just read your comment on the big buildings on top. You are right. Most recent imagery shows large building blocks. I correct my modifications. Best regards commented 2026-08-14 10:32:43 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187330003 (Comments: 1) | deleuzion (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187434127 commented 2026-08-14 10:31:57 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187335873 (Comments: 1) | gipps75 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, just wondering if there has been a discussion around adding cadastral parishes to OSM? Either way, OSM wiki says we should use admin_level=9 only for localities. Thanks. commented 2026-08-14 10:28:16 UTC by Alan Thomas ♦5 |
| 187424220 (Comments: 1) | AvNVRZL (Discussed changesets: 57) | Dag AvN, Het zal best werken.. Er is nog steeds discussie om algemeen emergency =yes te taggen op bv fiets- en voetpaden. Ik kan niet in de scrips van LiveNav kijken. Zie forum. Beter zou het zijn om de breedte van zo'n pad op... commented 2026-08-14 10:08:26 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187350134 (Comments: 3) | Maris33 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Labi, paldies. Cik zinu, vai elements ir punkts vai laukums pieturas relāciju neietekmē. commented 2026-08-14 10:07:03 UTC by HellMap ♦969 |
| 187308806 (Comments: 10) | De Ouwe Zeerover (Discussed changesets: 23) | Oké, helder verhaal. Dan laat ik het zo en voeg ik geen "noexit=yes" toe. De ANWB gebruikt Mapbox als router. commented 2026-08-14 10:00:26 UTC by De Ouwe Zeerover ♦18 |
| 187427101 (Comments: 1) | DimitarName (Discussed changesets: 4) | Благодаря ви за промяната! Новия маршрут е отразен и ще се появи в навигациите до около един месец. Правилната роля е stop понеже въ... commented 2026-08-14 10:00:00 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 187429199 (Comments: 1) | Marvin040 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Marvin, vielen Dank, dass du die fehlende Querungsmöglichkeit ergänzt hast und willkommen bei OSM! Hier ist allerdings noch Bedarf zur Nachbesserung: Der Weg, den du neu über den Pinneberger Weg angelegt hast, sollte mi... commented 2026-08-14 09:46:11 UTC by kadiwa ♦117 |
| 187431416 (Comments: 1) | Vrinsoft UK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. It looks like the business details were added to the wrong element. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631144204 is a larger landuse=commercial area containing multiple buildings, not Vrinsoft’s premises. Pleas... commented 2026-08-14 09:46:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187429168 (Comments: 3) | Arthur1092 (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.groningenbereikbaar.nl/actuele-verkeersinformatie commented 2026-08-14 09:42:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187303597 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 160) | Ups, to były przymiarki do oznaczenia nowego PSZOK-u, których nie skasowałem i nawet w końcu nie zrobiłem. commented 2026-08-14 09:39:55 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦427 |
| 185924975 (Comments: 3) | xenon_ (Discussed changesets: 3) | A no, dzieki za strone, zdjecia satelitarne troche rozmazane, na edytorze iD tez byly, ale te są na pewno nowsze commented 2026-08-14 09:33:45 UTC by xenon_ ♦3 |
| 187317162 (Comments: 1) | DoubleBear (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187430806 commented 2026-08-14 09:24:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
 | 187382960 (Comments: 4) | FyiIAmASpy (Discussed changesets: 1) | No worries. Approximate truth is better than no truth. I could have a look at it, but I might not be able to physically go there in a while. commented 2026-08-14 09:22:50 UTC by Tuplanolla ♦15 |
| 187397096 (Comments: 2) | Diagonal26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke Dir. Ich habe es wieder zurückgeändert, conditional kannte ich noch nicht. commented 2026-08-14 09:21:42 UTC by Diagonal26 ♦1 |
| 187429670 (Comments: 2) | Jorn Doorneweert (Discussed changesets: 1) | De paden heb ik doorverbonden met de overige wegen. Gr eggie commented 2026-08-14 09:20:43 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187412731 (Comments: 2) | 7lima (Discussed changesets: 4) | The so-called Berlin-Sofia Osage orange Axis. 😂 commented 2026-08-14 09:18:11 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 179566483 (Comments: 4) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 61) | DWG Ticket#2026081210000431 - I am now deleting all historic=battlefield world-wide added by Jobigutenburg. It's about 200 objects. commented 2026-08-14 09:13:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
 | 187426416 (Comments: 1) | thomas hermant (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour. Merci pour votre contribution à la cartographie. Pourriez-vous ajuster les zones résidentielles là où elles se croisent ou rejoignent des bâtiments ? Cordialement Hello. Thanks for mapping.<... commented 2026-08-14 09:09:29 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187270574 (Comments: 2) | alexisgrf44 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bon dia, Les modificacions sol·licitades han estat verificades i corresponen a l’estat i al règim de propietat dels terrenys afectats. El fet que alguns d’aquests camins siguin actualment utilitzats en el marc ... commented 2026-08-14 08:50:09 UTC by alexisgrf44 ♦1 |
| 172251354 (Comments: 4) | PeeWee32 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Ik kan je redenering wel volgen en het is arbitrair om landuse=highway toe te voegen. Aan de andere kant… als we landsdekkend landuse op polygonen nastreven dan kan het zinvol zijn om alle aansluitende polygonen een landuse tag te geven zoda... commented 2026-08-14 08:41:15 UTC by PeeWee32 ♦43 |
| 182644073 (Comments: 4) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 58) | Should be appearent: Because I was walking on grass when I added the tag commented 2026-08-14 08:37:25 UTC by Makeena ♦74 |
| 187362211 (Comments: 1) | adefrafafefdad (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187427846 commented 2026-08-14 08:31:37 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187349791 (Comments: 1) | mattdraddog (Discussed changesets: 3) | I've disconnected a wood area you mapped from joining to the A414 road. commented 2026-08-14 08:28:52 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 187360969 (Comments: 1) | Public_Transit_User (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187428185 commented 2026-08-14 08:28:43 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187240841 (Comments: 1) | Xom9k_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | These objects surely have Polish names? Not Ukrainian? commented 2026-08-14 08:22:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187415518 (Comments: 5) | Ward van Gasteren (Discussed changesets: 1) | Typo.. De place=hamlet ..name=molenheide staat..... Mn toetsenbord houdt mn redenering niet bij. commented 2026-08-14 08:20:41 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187427209 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 462) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549569387 hätte nicht in diesem Changeset landen sollen, sorry. commented 2026-08-14 08:18:23 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 183355239 (Comments: 1) | Moepmoep (Discussed changesets: 17) | Gekürztes Crossposting aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5259331 zwecks Auffindbarkeit in der Zukunft. Ich habe die Trails auf der nördlichen Talseite gestern Abend inspiziert. Sie sind alle gut erkennbar und sehen genutzt aus.<... commented 2026-08-14 08:12:54 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,261 |
| 182908148 (Comments: 4) | ReinerMeyer (Discussed changesets: 97) | Leider kann ich da auch nicht weiterhelfen. Die ganze Gegend ist mit Wanderwegen durchzogen. Obwohl die Beschilderung in Form von Ortsangaben und Zeiten sehr gut ist, ist es aber schwer Routen festzulegen. Hilfreich können da Hotels wie der See... commented 2026-08-14 08:10:30 UTC by ReinerMeyer ♦53 |
| 187408371 (Comments: 2) | MappingNomad (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thanks for the hint. The name on the box was impossible to read. Thanks for the names. It was an orange box which looks like the ones from ecobattery. I applied the template and added the missing information. commented 2026-08-14 08:09:13 UTC by MappingNomad ♦3 |
| 187426644 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 160) | Normalnie bym uznał tworzenie relacji dla zasobów za niepoprawne, jednakże uznałem to za zasadne z racji na nieunikalne nazwy kolonii. W skali miasta są powtarzalne i można tym samym je dodatkowo rozróżnić. commented 2026-08-14 07:55:54 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦427 |
| 178102010 (Comments: 1) | catarina03 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please do not use member ways of administrative boundaries for other purposes, it makes maintenance near impossible. If you feel that the feature you are mapping has the same geometry gluing (using a way that reuses the same nodes) is accepta... commented 2026-08-14 07:54:08 UTC by SimonPoole ♦384 |
| 181576036 (Comments: 1) | Own Oh (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154790130/ What's happening here? The existing buildings have been marked landuse=construction inside another landuse=construction polygon. commented 2026-08-14 07:37:54 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 187425237 (Comments: 1) | خادم الحسین (Discussed changesets: 1) | شرکت سازه گستر نصر مجری سازه های CFS، تهیه و توزیع مقاطع مختلف فولادی و انواع ابزار صنعتی commented 2026-08-14 07:25:52 UTC by خادم الحسین ♦1 |
| 187372541 (Comments: 1) | Versorgbar – SB-Kiosk & Radfahrer-Raststation (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du bist bei Deinen ersten Einträgen offenbar noch unsicher wie wir Dinge bei OSM eintragen. Der von Dir eingetragenen Kiosk heißt doch vermutlich nur "versorgbar". Der Rest, ... commented 2026-08-14 07:20:43 UTC by klik ♦51 |
| 187380082 (Comments: 1) | Versorgbar – SB-Kiosk & Radfahrer-Raststation (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du bist bei Deinen ersten Einträgen offenbar noch unsicher wie wir Dinge bei OSM eintragen. Der von Dir eingetragenen Kiosk ist sicher nicht Teil des Hessischen Radfernweges R5. Das aber sag... commented 2026-08-14 07:17:17 UTC by klik ♦51 |
| 187380125 (Comments: 1) | Versorgbar – SB-Kiosk & Radfahrer-Raststation (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du bist bei Deinen ersten Einträgen offenbar noch unsicher wie wir Dinge bei OSM eintragen. Der von Dir eingetragenen Kiosk ist sicher nicht Teil des Schwalm-Radweges. Das aber sagt dein Ein... commented 2026-08-14 07:16:50 UTC by klik ♦51 |
| 187411721 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Защото това пишеше в ATP. Явно са си сменили сървъра и стария са го оставили на самотек. Върнах промяната, както и за другите 2-3 лидъла. ht... commented 2026-08-14 07:14:07 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 187420879 (Comments: 1) | Teo2ra (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-14 07:14:06 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187421109 (Comments: 1) | Teo2ra (Discussed changesets: 3) | it is evlen more unlikely that you would find a pole mounted ALPR in the midde of the road, please double check the actual position of this ALPR and fix it on OSM. Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-08-14 07:13:44 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187421942 (Comments: 1) | Kadamoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | سلام و ممنون از مشارکتهایتان! من چند بهبود انجام دادهام؛ لطفاً نامها و پیوندهای ویکیپدیا را به گرههای روستا اضافه کنی... commented 2026-08-14 07:13:17 UTC by Karthoo ♦225 |
| 187421072 (Comments: 1) | Teo2ra (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-14 07:10:55 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 179762867 (Comments: 4) | PlayzinhoAgro-imports (Discussed changesets: 49) | Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187424993 commented 2026-08-14 07:10:37 UTC by CjMalone ♦254 |
| 187360471 (Comments: 1) | SK Quality Roofing (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 07:08:33 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187148805 (Comments: 1) | sadpinecone (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi sadpinecone, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! Adding an arbitrary free-text descriptor to the name=* is neither the actual name of the place, nor the correct way to indicate that something is closed. Neither... commented 2026-08-14 06:50:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 184445746 (Comments: 3) | fgouget (Discussed changesets: 39) | It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955133820 in this area is sole other case worldwide commented 2026-08-14 06:42:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187244873 (Comments: 1) | Zomein102 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187423874 commented 2026-08-14 06:41:49 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187237338 (Comments: 1) | ganelous (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187422754 commented 2026-08-14 06:40:10 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187418185 (Comments: 1) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thanks! I understand that it can be missed but I think that false positive (nonexistent museum showing up as active) is worse than false negative (missing one). And thanks you and local community in general, this one was I think sole map data... commented 2026-08-14 06:39:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187401595 (Comments: 3) | mattdraddog (Discussed changesets: 3) | The very large meadow multipolygon (Relation: 20383308) needs to be removed and mapped properly in smaller areas without covering other landuse areas and highways. commented 2026-08-14 06:29:23 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 187228705 (Comments: 1) | MrsC_23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187423614 commented 2026-08-14 06:28:28 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187390953 (Comments: 2) | kingserbia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pozdrav Smajser, totalno ste u pravu i to mi je promaklo. Ostavite da bude jednosmerna. Pozz i hvala na ispravci commented 2026-08-14 06:08:40 UTC by kingserbia ♦1 |
| 187301681 (Comments: 1) | RowanHTL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Rowan, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! I just wanted to let you know that the valid syntax for opening_hours=* from dawn to dusk/sunrise to sunset is opening_hours=dawn-dusk opening_hours=sunrise-sunset (n... commented 2026-08-14 05:58:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 186967249 (Comments: 1) | emergencydentistmo (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-14 05:52:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 184700809 (Comments: 1) | FDMS4 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Don't disconnect ways from fords. Please study the wiki before doing changes that are not adding anything. And the node you removed was part of a basically straight way segment. In conclusion, there was no "path alignment". commented 2026-08-14 05:45:35 UTC by Makeena ♦74 |
| 187413304 (Comments: 1) | BeunHoas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-14 05:44:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187412137 (Comments: 1) | Aryanmadhur0000000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-08-14 05:38:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187292996 (Comments: 1) | Gandolphi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Gandolphi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contributions! I just wanted to reach out to let you know that I made a number of fixes, cleanups and improvements to the tagging here in my changeset, as name=*, opening_hours... commented 2026-08-14 05:37:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187412710 (Comments: 1) | Aryanmadhur0000000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, welome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-08-14 05:37:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187412816 (Comments: 1) | Aryanmadhur0000000 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, welome to OSM. Is the added name real? commented 2026-08-14 05:37:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 157487903 (Comments: 1) | Kuiperonline (Discussed changesets: 20) | There is no gas station at this geolocation. Maybe there was an error or shift when choosing a spot for this POI. commented 2026-08-14 05:36:33 UTC by mapperaid ♦11 |
| 187416598 (Comments: 2) | dwiersma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Info samengevoegd commented 2026-08-14 05:35:55 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
 | 187211288 (Comments: 1) | Dr Em (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187320295 commented 2026-08-14 05:30:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187207313 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 12) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187319319 commented 2026-08-14 05:29:38 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187205958 (Comments: 1) | Cheesestick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187319517 commented 2026-08-14 05:28:42 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187231683 (Comments: 1) | Emanuell Alves (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187319897 commented 2026-08-14 05:28:08 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187211488 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 12) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187382543 commented 2026-08-14 05:27:07 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187013191 (Comments: 1) | Faniya (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187421327 commented 2026-08-14 05:26:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187252462 (Comments: 1) | MetroLoftPorto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187421195 commented 2026-08-14 05:25:11 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
 | 187230442 (Comments: 1) | alegg92cuba (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187420790 commented 2026-08-14 05:24:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187213417 (Comments: 1) | CalvaryCareCentre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187419574 commented 2026-08-14 05:23:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187256504 (Comments: 1) | zbabyfoalz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187419437 commented 2026-08-14 05:22:53 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187236187 (Comments: 1) | dudalima8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187383035 commented 2026-08-14 05:22:21 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187297069 (Comments: 1) | Kaitlynn Jennings (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 05:19:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187159091 (Comments: 2) | ChaoticOrangutan (Discussed changesets: 1) | NB, I just fixed the remainder of existing opening_hours=* with this particular syntax mistake in changeset 187421781 https://osm.org/changeset/187421781 Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-14 05:08:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187361254 (Comments: 4) | phoenixo1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, your comment doesn't answer the questions posed. Is the building actually 9 dwellings, and Riverside Cottage (number 33) just 1 of the 9? And is the address I mention above correct? If so, then the whole building is not Riverside C... commented 2026-08-14 04:48:33 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 187400732 (Comments: 1) | 500369299 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:40:07 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187391589 (Comments: 1) | any-timecleaning (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:37:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187419319 (Comments: 1) | chin1919 (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:36:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187405069 (Comments: 1) | daytripcarts (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:33:34 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187405434 (Comments: 1) | Ceren Limon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. |
| 187405007 (Comments: 1) | Ceren Limon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. |
| 187362830 (Comments: 1) | Santosfilipe14 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. |
 | 187420787 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 30) | Revert of changeset 187383433, changeset 184470027, changeset 184093440 and changeset 180723803 commented 2026-08-14 04:19:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 180723803 (Comments: 2) | eyestudio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. commented 2026-08-14 04:18:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 184093440 (Comments: 2) | eyestudio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. commented 2026-08-14 04:18:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 184470027 (Comments: 2) | eyestudio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. commented 2026-08-14 04:17:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187375971 (Comments: 1) | 500370693 (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-14 04:12:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 168165945 (Comments: 5) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 194) | То че няма е ясно, въпросът беше кой от текущите е бил магазин за дрехи по-рано :) commented 2026-08-14 04:06:55 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦59 |
| 187355868 (Comments: 1) | stevea (Discussed changesets: 136) | They are (as indicated to me) actually a LIDAR smear, approximated. These data may represent an old trail or roadbed, it's hard to say. A path, desired, maybe. Could be useful in an emergency evac, maybe. commented 2026-08-14 03:04:48 UTC by stevea ♦325 |
| 187410683 (Comments: 1) | accoda (Discussed changesets: 25) | Telefonnummern werden mit führender Landesvorwahl eingetragen. Also +49 für DE. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone commented 2026-08-14 03:04:42 UTC by Bienson ♦634 |
| 187389827 (Comments: 1) | Keek4600 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Anlage doppelt eingetragen. Fehler im Namen. Komplett unsinniges access-Tag. Bitte alles korrigieren. commented 2026-08-14 03:01:03 UTC by Bienson ♦634 |
| 187382294 (Comments: 1) | Keek4600 (Discussed changesets: 29) | charge="1.00 EUR/hour" commented 2026-08-14 02:58:13 UTC by Bienson ♦634 |
 | 187320916 (Comments: 2) | WilliamHarrison (Discussed changesets: 16) | @Thomaso58 Thanks! I am familiar with bus relations but did not notice the error, I appreciate the help. commented 2026-08-14 02:46:42 UTC by WilliamHarrison ♦23 |
| 187100153 (Comments: 1) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | is there a reason that the NB express lanes have been shifted to the SB side? Esri is the most up-to-date and doesn't line up with the current alignment. There's no comment provided as to if there's been some construction or something.... commented 2026-08-14 01:53:45 UTC by devemporer ♦4 |
| 187202654 (Comments: 2) | Ertain (Discussed changesets: 1) | My apologies. When I wrote that (which was a couple of years ago), I must have forgotten to add the entry for Sunday. commented 2026-08-14 01:37:27 UTC by Ertain ♦1 |
 | 187366479 (Comments: 1) | Goncar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por el aporte. En la etiqueta "nombre" va solo el nombre, o sea "El Lugar" en este caso. Lo de que es una veterinaria queda descrito con amenity=veterinary. Vas a ver que es lo mismo con las cosas comunes que tienen ... commented 2026-08-14 01:31:36 UTC by muralito ♦2,173 |
| 183998702 (Comments: 6) | SyrupMap (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187415764 where these trails were deleted once again. commented 2026-08-14 01:15:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187415764 (Comments: 1) | Mapper48580 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted this un-explained deletion by a new user which repeated an earlier, similar deletion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183998702. A deletion on this scale requires a proper explanation; "decolonize the nine drops" i... commented 2026-08-14 01:14:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 61449368 (Comments: 1) | JF-JF-JF (Discussed changesets: 1) | node/5816662964/history uses sup_rental=yes which only has 9 uses globally whereas standup_paddleboard_rental=yes has 378 uses and is being supported by editors, would you support changing it? commented 2026-08-14 00:49:35 UTC by aharvey ♦1,973 |
| 182567468 (Comments: 1) | trapicki (Discussed changesets: 22) | node/13821983813/history uses sup_rental=yes which only has 9 uses globally whereas standup_paddleboard_rental=yes has 378 uses and is being supported by editors, would you support changing it? commented 2026-08-14 00:48:55 UTC by aharvey ♦1,973 |
| 175363541 (Comments: 3) | statelyelms (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello Russ, Thanks for catching that. Not surprised to hear the wiki is inconsistent! Thanks, Elms commented 2026-08-14 00:48:08 UTC by statelyelms ♦19 |
| 105786084 (Comments: 1) | osm915 (Discussed changesets: 12) | node/4212217206 amenity=boat_rental lists rowboat_rental=yes and it has 121 uses globally, compared with 3 global uses of rowingboat_rental=yes would you support changing it? commented 2026-08-14 00:46:15 UTC by aharvey ♦1,973 |
| 44770122 (Comments: 1) | Geofreund1 (Discussed changesets: 146) | node/4580335688 amenity=boat_rental lists rowboat_rental=yes and it has 121 uses globally, compared with 3 global uses of rowingboat_rental=yes would you support changing it? commented 2026-08-14 00:45:31 UTC by aharvey ♦1,973 |
| 187334451 (Comments: 3) | Umie Mohd Hashim (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-14 00:44:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187364688 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-14 00:44:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187341426 (Comments: 3) | Umie Mohd Hashim (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the quick response. I'm not quite sure what you mean by the "previous location", as before your changeset there wasn't anything tagged as the "Royale Chenang Resort". Was another local resort renamed to this?<... commented 2026-08-14 00:44:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187314429 (Comments: 3) | CathyArgus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Cathy, Thanks for the detailed explanation! That is very helpful in confirming what you are trying to achieve here. > I saw the old Vitina Studio Motel information on one of the buildings and thought it was a duplicate/outdated l... commented 2026-08-14 00:27:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187416386 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 100) | Discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187414255 commented 2026-08-14 00:03:23 UTC by eerib ♦370 |
| 187414255 (Comments: 1) | Salmonryder (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dear Salmonryder, I have reverted changesets #187414255, 187414246, 187414241, 187414230 because they're an intentional mass deletion of trails similar to your previous changeset for which your received a warning and temporary block for.<... commented 2026-08-14 00:03:07 UTC by eerib ♦370 |
| 187416460 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 187414227, 187415745. commented 2026-08-13 23:53:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187416458 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 187414227, 187415745. commented 2026-08-13 23:53:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187414227 (Comments: 1) | Wintercat01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 187416460, 187416458 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import commented 2026-08-13 23:53:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 183486170 (Comments: 1) | БураяЧу (Discussed changesets: 1) | Не шалите commented 2026-08-13 23:47:50 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 185920029 (Comments: 3) | VLD318 (Discussed changesets: 15) | When "crossing:markings=*" and "crossing:signals=*" are present, there is no usefulness to the old "crossing=*" tag, as its value is entirely derivative of the improved tagging schema. Perpetuating the "crossing=*&q... commented 2026-08-13 23:42:57 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦129 |
| 187182310 (Comments: 1) | tmdtarran (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21094 commented 2026-08-13 23:31:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 187342958 (Comments: 1) | Howpper (Discussed changesets: 206) | Remember to leave descriptive changeset comments to help out other mappers! commented 2026-08-13 23:28:57 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦45 |
| 185720010 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 227) | I see; I guess that makes sense. This since area is actively being developed, I've always interpreted these names as extensions of existing streets if they get built. commented 2026-08-13 23:27:04 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦326 |
| 187369907 (Comments: 2) | lambalicious (Discussed changesets: 28) | ¡Oh gracias! Malinterpreté el propósito de la etiqueta leyéndola en otra parte y nunca se me ocurrió entrar a la página a revisar y ver la foto que explica todo. commented 2026-08-13 23:23:25 UTC by lambalicious ♦5 |
| 187396602 (Comments: 4) | Cheeseman4428 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh, right, you got unit 300 put on the therapy business. Presumably the real estate is then at unit 100, but it would need a survey to confirm. commented 2026-08-13 23:17:09 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187262359 (Comments: 3) | CathyArgus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Cathy, Thanks for the quick and understanding reply! By the way, I should have linked you the wiki documentation for the entrance=* above; its https://osm.wiki/Key:entrance > Correct the property's address from the his... commented 2026-08-13 22:54:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 186823179 (Comments: 5) | Vladislav Grechannik_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | yay, thanks! That was the road i was talking about, yeah. Noticed the shape was wrong when I was mapping the D1 cycle route commented 2026-08-13 22:51:53 UTC by Vladislav Grechannik ♦3 |
| 187252266 (Comments: 3) | hmpf99 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Super. Danke auch. commented 2026-08-13 22:41:56 UTC by XcoderB ♦4 |
| 118391657 (Comments: 1) | Etvetera (Discussed changesets: 1) | If the meadow cover more than it should, you should reshape it so that it covers area that is has to (in this case I will reshape it for you :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187414839 commented 2026-08-13 22:32:50 UTC by JanezPavelZebovec_import ♦3 |
| 187363825 (Comments: 4) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 30) | And as one more tip, please make sure to use correct tagging per OSM and local convention--@HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi 's changeset 14089627189 provides an example of some of these corrections. https://osm.org/changeset/14089627189 commented 2026-08-13 22:27:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187409284 (Comments: 2) | NicolocoX (Discussed changesets: 2) | Entendido, gracias por el comentario. Saludos. commented 2026-08-13 22:22:48 UTC by NicolocoX ♦1 |
| 187414370 (Comments: 1) | erstus (Discussed changesets: 1) | imagery_used=Ohio Statewide Imagery Program (iD bug: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/12717) commented 2026-08-13 22:13:51 UTC by erstus ♦1 |
| 187154543 (Comments: 5) | ardinin (Discussed changesets: 7) | Was auch immer da kassiert wird, ein allg. zugänglicher Unterstand ist es doch wohl nicht. shop also whatever ;-) commented 2026-08-13 22:12:38 UTC by ardinin ♦6 |
| 187407702 (Comments: 2) | Brian Roach (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dear Brian Roach, please don't delete private roads from OSM. You can apply an "access=private" tag to them so that it becomes clear that these cannot be used by the public, but the fact that they exist should still be recorded on OSM.... commented 2026-08-13 22:03:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187401365 (Comments: 1) | BeaconOSM (Discussed changesets: 82) | Just for future reference, in most of the United States, weight restrictions are expressed in short tons (abbreviated as "tons", "T", or "t"), which should be tagged as 'maxweight=### st', and sometimes in poun... commented 2026-08-13 22:03:25 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187413842 (Comments: 1) | Vikoto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Al igual que la tienda de alcoholes. Borró todo menos la tienda. Si algo ya no existe dejar solo la dirección. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1874138... commented 2026-08-13 22:02:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187407873 (Comments: 1) | Brian Roach (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187414134 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of private roads commented 2026-08-13 22:01:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187414134 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 187407702, 187407873. commented 2026-08-13 22:01:52 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187413556 (Comments: 1) | Vikoto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Ok con que no exista la tienda, pero por favor no borrar la dirección. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187413556 commented 2026-08-13 21:59:28 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187378488 (Comments: 1) | sh_df (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo sh_df und willkommen auf OSM! Das Erfassen von Wegen, Gebäuden und ähnlichen Informationen auf privatem Grund ist durchaus gängig und auch nützlich. Wege, die für die Öffentlichkeit nicht Nutzbar sind, werde... commented 2026-08-13 21:52:51 UTC by Marvk ♦106 |
| 187410188 (Comments: 1) | aprimoremapa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá, na tag name vai apenas o nome da via, para cep use tag específica, para nomes antigos você pode usar alt_name ou old_name. Veja exemplos nas vias próximas. commented 2026-08-13 21:41:21 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 186850225 (Comments: 16) | Kubolsky (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nadpisane nie napisane commented 2026-08-13 21:28:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187381930 (Comments: 1) | Meister Stewart Partners at Compass (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the office really open on Saturday and Sunday too? or by "daily" did you mean Monday thru Friday? commented 2026-08-13 21:26:22 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 185659310 (Comments: 31) | olo81 (Discussed changesets: 104) | Nikt nie proponował dodania bicycle=no commented 2026-08-13 21:24:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187410776 (Comments: 4) | WalkBikeGreen (Discussed changesets: 5) | node verwijderd.. Het was al goed getagd hier. Wellicht is het schoolterrein iets groter nu na de sloop? commented 2026-08-13 21:19:33 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187412714 (Comments: 1) | AmazingGracey (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks good, thanks! commented 2026-08-13 21:15:21 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187307567 (Comments: 1) | Sara Lee Ellis (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you added the name to a building several blocks away from where you put the main office point. Did you mean to edit the building that's at 7225 170th Avenue Northeast or is that a mistake? commented 2026-08-13 21:13:42 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187307206 (Comments: 4) | Dmapedits (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you very much! commented 2026-08-13 21:13:21 UTC by vasony ♦590 |
| 87290554 (Comments: 1) | ATS_Alpenregion (Discussed changesets: 16) | Way 241708282: motor_vehicle=permissive wäre dann richtig, wenn derzeit jeder dort fahren dürfte, und die Erlaubnis dazu (prinzipiell) jederzeit zurückgenommen werden könnte. (siehe OSM-Wiki) Wahrscheinlich wäre hier mot... commented 2026-08-13 21:11:51 UTC by martinst ♦404 |
| 187364640 (Comments: 2) | AmazingGracey (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you. I wondered how people did it and should have looked it up. I took care of it! Thanks for your help. commented 2026-08-13 21:10:13 UTC by AmazingGracey ♦1 |
| 187308120 (Comments: 1) | Jesper Dall (Discussed changesets: 3) | Jeg tror nu ikke at vejen skal markeres som highway=track men var ok som highway=service Kan du fortælle hvad der fik dig til at ændre status på vejen? Service: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=servic... commented 2026-08-13 21:06:59 UTC by b-holdet ♦390 |
| 186950240 (Comments: 5) | tuxfan58 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, remove the privat access. I'm German and don't know much about Swedish law and I don't care either. The paths would be a good way to get around Lake Asplangen and that's why the signs and barriers were certainly installed. ... commented 2026-08-13 20:51:57 UTC by tuxfan58 ♦1 |
| 187356301 (Comments: 1) | Palash Parmar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and thanks for the contribution. Did you really mean that these lanes are marked with a through (a.k.a. straight) arrow? If there are no pavement markings, it can be left empty (as it was mapped) or written out as "none", like turn:l... commented 2026-08-13 20:42:24 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187409593 (Comments: 1) | MustafaOyunda155 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Merhaba. 1 Ağustos'ta hem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186632021 değişikliğinize yorum yazmış hem de aynı hususları özel mesajla tarafınıza iletmiştim. Lütfen yeni otobüs hatları eklemeden önce, ge&cced... commented 2026-08-13 20:36:51 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦262 |
| 187407555 (Comments: 1) | Grant612 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The coastal highway was incorrectly map, and my attempt to correct it made it worse I'm afraid. Need someone to correct it as it stretches beyond my task. Thank you. Way: Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway (1138122998) Version #18 commented 2026-08-13 20:35:01 UTC by Grant612 ♦1 |
| 187402028 (Comments: 2) | CrstblS (Discussed changesets: 21) | Tal cual, el camino no ha tenido mantención en años y ayer lo visité, no está para nada en condiciones de que un vehículo suba ni aunque fuese un tanque. --- Published u... commented 2026-08-13 20:34:44 UTC by CrstblS ♦6 |
| 187409722 (Comments: 3) | WalkBikeGreen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Het is al weer terug 😀 commented 2026-08-13 20:10:23 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187409699 (Comments: 4) | WalkBikeGreen (Discussed changesets: 5) | No problem.. dat zijn van die starterfoutjes. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-08-13 20:08:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187409739 (Comments: 2) | WalkBikeGreen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Excuus, ik zal me wat beter inlezen. commented 2026-08-13 20:04:27 UTC by WalkBikeGreen ♦4 |
| 169011470 (Comments: 3) | Felipe Ricardo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi, seja bem vindo, acho q existe alguns tutorias do josm no youtube. No caso foi que a via estava desconectada, um erro muito comum mas q causa muitos problemas já q as vias precisam estar conectadas para poderem ser navegaveis mui... commented 2026-08-13 20:02:11 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦89 |
| 187369890 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 95) | Miksi muuttelit lisää parkkikäytäviä parking_aisle -> driveway? Mistä keksit, että Heinjoenpolku olisi pihakatu? commented 2026-08-13 19:57:50 UTC by TuomoSe ♦6 |
| 164232365 (Comments: 2) | pahlavi_temecula (Discussed changesets: 19) | Also source=public record is not descriptive enough for OSM commented 2026-08-13 19:57:33 UTC by weblogdryads ♦33 |
| 187409639 (Comments: 1) | WalkBikeGreen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-13 19:57:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187402228 (Comments: 1) | Anne Kropmans (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-13 19:56:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187369782 (Comments: 1) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 95) | Miksi muuttelit taas parkkikäytäviä parking_aisle -> driveway? Mistä keksit, että Hannilanpolku olisi pihakatu? commented 2026-08-13 19:52:33 UTC by TuomoSe ♦6 |
| 181475915 (Comments: 2) | mildlyconcernedtomato (Discussed changesets: 4) | Despite what the wiki says about adding "kW" to power output, that wiki was updated to recommend adding "kW" by the same guy who injected loads of bad data into OSM with the infamously half-baked bulk import of supercharge.info on... commented 2026-08-13 19:42:59 UTC by TheNightRider ♦68 |
| 187370456 (Comments: 2) | ProtoplasmaKid (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the reviewing Frans! I'm still learning. Thanks for the document; I'll review it carefully. commented 2026-08-13 19:40:34 UTC by ProtoplasmaKid ♦1 |
| 187313679 (Comments: 2) | WHS Contributor (Discussed changesets: 6) | I got lazy about this one because I was just splitting an existing path. Fixed. commented 2026-08-13 19:33:36 UTC by WHS Contributor ♦5 |
| 187407376 (Comments: 1) | Café Staminé (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Hier wurden (wohl versehentlich) ein paar Relationen verändert. Ich habe die Änderung zurückgenommen und das Cafe separat eingetragen. Servus commented 2026-08-13 19:29:06 UTC by opendcc ♦1,587 |
| 187360496 (Comments: 1) | WHS Contributor (Discussed changesets: 6) | As you map out sidewalks, you can/should also add sidewalk presence tags in the form of sidewalk:left=*, sidewalk:right=*, and sidewalk:both=*. For example, the long segment of 134th Pl should be sidewalk:both=separate, and the circle at the end shou... commented 2026-08-13 19:26:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 185131237 (Comments: 1) | Heynz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Im besten Fall bei Baustellen an Straßen bitte den Typ (primary, secondary, tertiary) beibehalten, damit diese Information weiter für Router nutzbar bleibt, wenn die Baustelle geöffnet ist, die Daten aber noch nicht aktualisiert. <... commented 2026-08-13 19:24:47 UTC by KartKollektor ♦20 |
| 187314836 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314921#c1643719. Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 19:12:55 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187314885 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314921#c1643719. Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 19:12:38 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187314897 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314921#c1643719. Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 19:12:28 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187314905 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314921#c1643719. Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 19:12:04 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187314921 (Comments: 1) | reynaofnoflocks (Discussed changesets: 6) | I think you could change surveillance:type=ALPR to surveillance:type=camera instead of deleting that tag entirely if you know that it's a camera. commented 2026-08-13 19:11:26 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187399906 (Comments: 1) | Masalucar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bienvenido a OSM! Espero atentamente el día que añadas "El Prado de Llobregado" como nombre en castellano de el Prat. Te recuerdo que se necesita una fuente oficial al hacer un cambio de esta magnitud, cosa que no proporcionas... commented 2026-08-13 18:56:04 UTC by marcmarti ♦54 |
| 183576490 (Comments: 3) | mikkaelseppo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dopóki na teren budowy można wejść to nie jest to fakt na gruncie. commented 2026-08-13 18:50:12 UTC by zgroza ♦7 |
| 187316909 (Comments: 1) | TetrisEffect (Discussed changesets: 6) | sorry, didn't see this changeset when creating another set of relations for the 17 cherry line, is it ok if I use my relations (relation/21223473 and relation/21223474) to map the route instead? commented 2026-08-13 18:42:56 UTC by seateaeye ♦8 |
| 187371481 (Comments: 1) | kova66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added sidewalks around a parking garage, from aerial imagery." You can find more examples here: ... commented 2026-08-13 18:38:25 UTC by impiaaa ♦489 |
| 187379663 (Comments: 1) | MapBritan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Tagged pedestrian crossing nodes as having signals, known from local knowledge." You can find mo... commented 2026-08-13 18:37:03 UTC by impiaaa ♦489 |
| 156442314 (Comments: 1) | WayneSchlegel (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi, den Schaltschrank "Pfalzgrafenring I" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204875916) hast du ja schon öfters bearbeitet. Angeblich hat sich dort die Hausnummer geändert, siehe diesen anonymen Hinweis: https://www.openstr... commented 2026-08-13 18:32:33 UTC by KartKollektor ♦20 |
| 187242595 (Comments: 1) | Mehdi fakkar (Discussed changesets: 4) | Lay hdik a mehdi commented 2026-08-13 18:15:55 UTC by ilias_ ♦457 |
| 186786311 (Comments: 2) | abotarep (Discussed changesets: 1) | اسم المكان والشعيب الأجاوير لكنه ليس وادي commented 2026-08-13 18:13:11 UTC by abotarep ♦1 |
| 187405245 (Comments: 1) | rle32795 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Naming change on Miljoonativoli from local knowledge commented 2026-08-13 18:03:02 UTC by rle32795 ♦37 |
| 187404583 (Comments: 1) | JG Mazury (Discussed changesets: 3) | Korekta opisu zestawu zmian: Skorygowano obrys budynku 3A przy ulicy Sikorskiego. commented 2026-08-13 17:52:37 UTC by JG Mazury ♦5 |
| 186883396 (Comments: 2) | bojnabeny (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zdravím, fakt v lese vybudovali cyklochodníky? commented 2026-08-13 17:39:03 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,121 |
| 185941689 (Comments: 1) | nogene22 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you used many strange tags here, e.g. ryard \t331 windex \t1 wpar \t4 wyard \t372 index 1 id 10 Please have a look to other golf courses how the tagging is done there. commented 2026-08-13 17:38:15 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 187240632 (Comments: 1) | jeka p (Discussed changesets: 121) | Hi, you added 'charge_point_id' and 'charge-point-id' tags to charging stations. Reference numbers are usually tagged using 'ref:XYZ', e.g. ref:charge_point. Could you check and fix this? commented 2026-08-13 17:27:41 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 187403301 (Comments: 1) | bo0tzz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi.. Tip.. dan kan de regel building=yes weg. Mvg, eggie commented 2026-08-13 17:27:09 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187348174 (Comments: 7) | HJGroenVRFR (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ja, logisch dat ze dan ook 'uit' moeten kunnen voor hulpdiensten. maxaxleload:emergency=12 lijkt me correct als die waarde klopt. commented 2026-08-13 17:24:05 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦782 |
 | 187379421 (Comments: 1) | ChehVlad (Discussed changesets: 13) | Na kas čia sužymėta? Krūva neegzistuojančių shopping mall? Keli pastatai vienas ant kito? commented 2026-08-13 17:23:53 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,105 |
 | 186281524 (Comments: 1) | Buciero (Discussed changesets: 3) | This changeset caused many duplicate buildings. Please alter your process to make sure that you are not duplicating buildings. eg. you duplicated w1543356262 with w1543995507 commented 2026-08-13 17:15:54 UTC by OldManCelli ♦102 |
| 187247362 (Comments: 2) | TenPe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Szia! Javítottam megfigyelőállomásra. A légifelvételes javaslatot is köszönöm, egyébként az Esti world felvétel frissebb, és az eltolás valóban kell! <... commented 2026-08-13 17:12:03 UTC by TenPe ♦4 |
| 187402500 (Comments: 1) | KartKollektor (Discussed changesets: 9) | Konkret Hinweis 5452067 und 5135622 commented 2026-08-13 17:00:16 UTC by KartKollektor ♦20 |
| 187215976 (Comments: 1) | Kfigi (Discussed changesets: 1) | I went shopping hear. The opening times on the window. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187215976 commented 2026-08-13 16:57:13 UTC by Kfigi ♦1 |
 | 187402048 (Comments: 1) | bodayw (Discussed changesets: 3) | ref: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%AE%87%E5%9F%8E%E5%BA%83%E5%9F%9F%E9%80%A3%E5%90%88#%E6%B6%88%E9%98%B2%E7%BD%B2 https://www.ukisyobo.or.jp/q/list/34.html commented 2026-08-13 16:51:57 UTC by bodayw ♦3 |
| 187375925 (Comments: 2) | PaleNacon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Tack för informationen. När Corren och deras plakat ljuger så undrar man... commented 2026-08-13 16:40:11 UTC by PaleNacon ♦1 |
| 187387748 (Comments: 3) | CVV2007 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Laat je niet ontmoedigen door een validator! Mapse... eggie commented 2026-08-13 16:39:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
 | 187361393 (Comments: 1) | om khaled (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! please verify the names added to buildings. for example, "name=منزل عادل الشامي" appears to be a private name or the owner’s name rather than a publicly used name for the building. For more information... commented 2026-08-13 16:27:15 UTC by VLD0251 ♦149 |
| 184484795 (Comments: 1) | Superadlen (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hi, please verify whether “Café Chergui” https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315875647 is the actual name of the establishment and whether it really includes both a gym and a café. Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-13 16:16:08 UTC by VLD0251 ♦149 |
| 165042289 (Comments: 4) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hallo Thomas, vielen Dank für deine liebe Antwort! Ich war hier nicht spezifisch genug, es ging um die Abkürzung operator=SBS in den beiden Relationen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18998560 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2026-08-13 16:11:25 UTC by dreua ♦138 |
| 187370324 (Comments: 1) | FilipCh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thanks for your efforts to improve the map.However I don't thin k it is a good diea to add this former tram line, because there's hardly any trace left of it. On OSM, we map what's there now, not what used to be there (although the... commented 2026-08-13 16:07:43 UTC by rhhs ♦233 |
| 187380381 (Comments: 1) | Superadlen (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hi, "name=Jeu enfant" is a description, not a proper name. please remove it if no actual name is used for the playground. Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-13 16:06:27 UTC by VLD0251 ♦149 |
| 187211737 (Comments: 2) | RazorSN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, i-wie war die nicht zu sehen. Auch als ich in der Bearbeitung war. Oder hab ich da was übersehen? Bin noch ein Noobie :-) commented 2026-08-13 15:52:15 UTC by RazorSN ♦1 |
| 187392173 (Comments: 2) | EmJeeJee (Discussed changesets: 3) | typo access=private met foot=permissive commented 2026-08-13 15:49:41 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 167668999 (Comments: 2) | jogemu (Discussed changesets: 41) | Olá, thank you for sharing your doubts. After a closer look, I must have misread the parallel shadows in satellite imagery as rails and decided to delete it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187352197 commented 2026-08-13 15:48:45 UTC by jogemu ♦48 |
| 187398937 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 100) | Discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186424970 commented 2026-08-13 15:46:54 UTC by eerib ♦370 |
| 186293038 (Comments: 1) | gentoid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Prosba o zamykanie na bieżąco uwag po naniesieniu zmian do nich tym bardziej że to Twoje uwagi commented 2026-08-13 15:39:16 UTC by d3mol3k ♦195 |
| 187354740 (Comments: 2) | remurin (Discussed changesets: 1) | @TrickyFoxy полное написание считается грамостким, поэтому сокращал. Сейчас исправлю и уберу сокращения commented 2026-08-13 15:10:10 UTC by remurin ♦1 |
| 187393350 (Comments: 1) | Beheerder Veluwe Noord (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag Beheerder.. Nu is het een lege lijn met nog een surfacetag erop. Je kunt wel disused:highway=track gebruiken. Hoort surface compacted er dan nog wel op? Ik heb het als bovenstaand aangepast. commented 2026-08-13 15:08:34 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| X | 187378660 (Comments: 1) | Idahooligan-1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for your contribution! This is helpful, but in the future could you please not put descriptions of objects in their name or operator fields? If OrganicMaps doesn't have a good way to express the information you're trying to add, ... commented 2026-08-13 15:05:28 UTC by maptheworld2050 ♦7 |
| 187308086 (Comments: 3) | De Ouwe Zeerover (Discussed changesets: 23) | Dan is private fromeel oke.... hoewel..niet alles is zwartwit. Soms is het handiger om access=permissive te taggen.. Denk aan bezorgdiensten bv die ook OSM gebruiken en dat zijn er veel. Voor een doorgaande weg dan weer beter niet permissive gebr... commented 2026-08-13 15:00:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 159871492 (Comments: 7) | Woxholtt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Årh, okay. Beklager, at jeg har spildt din tid. Tip: Man kan vente med at starte GPS-optagelse, til man når udkanten af sin hjemby. Og nogle typer GPS-spor kan åbnes i simple tekstprogrammer, hvis man ønsker at slet... commented 2026-08-13 14:57:33 UTC by cyclist789 ♦95 |
| 187390753 (Comments: 1) | Maarten75 (Discussed changesets: 4) | De info stond dubbel.Alles naar de adresnode verplaatst. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-13 14:56:01 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187392945 (Comments: 1) | Maarten75 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Maarten.. Het was dubbel getagd. Ik heb alle info verplaatst naar de bestaande adresnode Gr eggie commented 2026-08-13 14:53:36 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187325274 (Comments: 2) | GongolaRiver (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi pertile, Thank you for clarifying! commented 2026-08-13 14:53:34 UTC by GongolaRiver ♦1 |
| 184235314 (Comments: 4) | De Ouwe Zeerover (Discussed changesets: 23) | Dankjewel eggie, er staat verder geen bebording. Ook geen C1. Bedankt voor de correcties! Groet DOZ commented 2026-08-13 14:51:44 UTC by De Ouwe Zeerover ♦18 |
| 170469251 (Comments: 1) | NVBW_Edit_wielandb (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, wie kommst Du darauf, dass die beiden Behinderten-Parkplätze am Bhf. Schorndorf Park+Ride sein sollen? Da ist keine entsprechende Beschilderung. commented 2026-08-13 14:50:31 UTC by Mammi71 ♦283 |
| 187165055 (Comments: 10) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Да но на повечето места името е написано на вратите за трансформатора/-ите , обикновено с маркер, но наистина понякога го пишат на кутиите... commented 2026-08-13 14:49:51 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦59 |
| 187395263 (Comments: 1) | Maarten75 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hoi. Alle tags zijn vatgelegd in uk english. Dus sport=rowing.. niet roeien. Dat begrijpt osm niet.. commented 2026-08-13 14:48:40 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187394669 (Comments: 1) | Patrick Wierdsma (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wanneer je wil dat de naam te zien is op de kaart dan kunnen die tags beter op de gebouwomtrek. commented 2026-08-13 14:46:59 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 167393755 (Comments: 9) | Edelsalami (Discussed changesets: 66) | @woodpeck Aufgrund der Historie mit Benutzer flohoff habe ich hier anders reagiert, als es bei anderen Mappern angemessen wäre, ja. Es ist aber zu beachten, dass Benutzer flohoff hier z.B. nicht fragt, warum es gemappt wurde, wie es ist, sondern... commented 2026-08-13 14:45:25 UTC by Edelsalami ♦134 |
| 186691507 (Comments: 9) | Edelsalami (Discussed changesets: 66) | > Aber Du hast in diesem Changeset eine Weg-Teilung gelöscht Ja, ich habe eine, aus meiner Sicht, unnötige Teilung entfernt. Ich sehe dort nur eine Verkehrsinsel zum Zwecke der Fußgängerquerung, keine Fahrbahntrennung. ... commented 2026-08-13 14:38:33 UTC by Edelsalami ♦134 |
| 187385717 (Comments: 4) | Patrick Wierdsma (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dbuilding commented 2026-08-13 14:37:56 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187366612 (Comments: 3) | JuanMelo (Discussed changesets: 49) | ok. Accepted. But keep mapping accurately. Best regards commented 2026-08-13 14:31:29 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187320553 (Comments: 4) | Dmapedits (Discussed changesets: 2) | Köszönöm! commented 2026-08-13 14:30:48 UTC by Dmapedits ♦2 |
| 185719522 (Comments: 1) | Breno_BRSSZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi vi que teve duplicação de varias vias que não necessesariamente são duplicadas. qual seria o problema q estaria tentando resolver? att. Gustavo commented 2026-08-13 14:18:22 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦89 |
| 187126741 (Comments: 2) | meihou (Discussed changesets: 10) | it's an error. I corrected it. commented 2026-08-13 14:16:30 UTC by meihou ♦8 |
 | 187393758 (Comments: 1) | B252697 (Discussed changesets: 49) | Official NParks Map of West Coast Park: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/parks-docs/west-coast-park/west-coast-park-map.png commented 2026-08-13 14:16:13 UTC by B252697 ♦58 |
| 187338191 (Comments: 1) | Dmitry99377 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет адрес на забор. Этот адрес уже есть на здании. commented 2026-08-13 14:13:21 UTC by mavl ♦77,092 |
| 186755719 (Comments: 5) | Edelsalami (Discussed changesets: 66) | Grundsätzlich sollte man (a) nicht im Changeset-Kommentar die Namen anderer Mapper erwähnen, deren "Fehler" man korrigiert, ausser es wäre jetzt ein Fall von Vandalismus solchen Ausmaßes, dass die Person gleich eine Dau... commented 2026-08-13 14:13:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187321230 (Comments: 1) | prostitutka (Discussed changesets: 8) | Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добаляет дубликаты точек (точки в те места, где точки уже есть). Это нужно откатывать. commented 2026-08-13 14:06:45 UTC by mavl ♦77,092 |
| 187310355 (Comments: 1) | prostitutka (Discussed changesets: 8) | Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добаляет дубликаты точек (точки в те места, где точки уже есть). Это нужно откатывать. commented 2026-08-13 14:06:39 UTC by mavl ♦77,092 |
| 187390699 (Comments: 1) | Maarten75 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Niet dubbel taggen. Gebruik in dit geval dan de adresnodes en haal dezelfde info van de gebouwomtrekken af. Dan rend... commented 2026-08-13 14:04:08 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 185268472 (Comments: 2) | BromBrom (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, thanks for the feedback! You're completely right — traffic_sign:exemption is non-standard. I've cleaned it up and updated the tag to traffic_sign=NL:C12,OB:108 across Zeedijk, keeping the explicit access tags (motor_vehicle=des... commented 2026-08-13 14:00:15 UTC by BromBrom ♦5 |
| 186912334 (Comments: 5) | Archi_Ma (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi gurglypipe, Thank you for your feedback. I initially aligned the highway because the previous geometry was quite kinked, and I intended to smooth the alignment. However, after reviewing the forum discussion and understanding the comm... commented 2026-08-13 13:53:50 UTC by Archi_Ma ♦24 |
 | 133840572 (Comments: 1) | one_half_3544 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10728469652/history/3 We see a mountain_pass but no path/track/highway that can be used to cross that ridge using the mountain_pass. Wouldn't natural=saddle be a better choice? commented 2026-08-13 13:44:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,082 |
| 187366273 (Comments: 1) | ASRvwde (Discussed changesets: 6) | Da die Sperrung nur wenige Tage dauert, habe ich Dein CS weitgehend zurückgesetzt. Es ist aus gutem Grund allgemeiner Konsens, Sperrungen, die nicht wenigstens einige Monate dauern, nicht in OSM einzutragen. Karten-Apps oder andere Datenauswerte... commented 2026-08-13 13:44:14 UTC by hsc666 ♦491 |
| X | 187385924 (Comments: 3) | YounesSaadatikian (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted Texas edits in changeset/187391778 commented 2026-08-13 13:41:58 UTC by iandees-bot ♦1 |
| 187385984 (Comments: 3) | EmJeeJee (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik heb even het pad gesplitst bij het hek. Dat kan niet met editor iD, want er lopen drie wandelrouterelaties overheen. Het kan alleen met editor JOSM. iD maakt routerelaties stuk bij bewerken. gr eggie commented 2026-08-13 13:29:09 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 164827645 (Comments: 1) | The Madcabbie (Discussed changesets: 6) | hi, are you certain this bypass section is a 70? I could not see any NSL signs, but did see 50 commented 2026-08-13 13:09:56 UTC by 4004 ♦1,954 |
| 37279053 (Comments: 1) | Mopfus (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, At this point: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4011979504 you have mountain_pass=yes. I think that natural=saddle fits better as there is no road/path/highway there that can be used to PASS that place. Mountainpasses usually are... commented 2026-08-13 13:04:15 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,082 |
| 187273844 (Comments: 10) | flohoff (Discussed changesets: 82) | > die Fahrbahnen sind bis zu dem punkt an dem sie zusammenlaufen mit einer durchgezogenen linie verlängert. Das ist deine Interpretation. Faktisch endet die Trennung mit der Verkehrsinsel. Dahinter ist eine durchgezogene Linie. Durchge... commented 2026-08-13 13:01:40 UTC by Edelsalami ♦134 |
| 187389606 (Comments: 1) | JeanSebastien (Discussed changesets: 4) | Le doublon en question : changeset/180126951. Il s'agissait d'un doublon de modification de changeset/180126933 commented 2026-08-13 13:00:42 UTC by JeanSebastien ♦8 |
| 180126951 (Comments: 1) | Benji_Toshi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et merci pour cette contribution. Je remarque cependant que vous avez probablement eu un souci avec iD. Ce groupe de modif est un doublon de changeset/180126933 Par conséquent, il y a des objets en double. J'ai invers&ea... commented 2026-08-13 12:59:53 UTC by JeanSebastien ♦8 |
| 187389383 (Comments: 1) | acres1nvented (Discussed changesets: 4) | By the signs I mean the main signs at the main south and north entrance to the park. It is possible other signs may refer to it by the Talacre Town Green name but this principal name seems to be Talacre Gardens. commented 2026-08-13 12:59:16 UTC by acres1nvented ♦10 |
| 180486002 (Comments: 2) | Archi_Ma (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi adigis, After reviewing the GPS traces and the available street-level imagery, I don't have enough ground truth evidence to add the junction=roundabout tag here. There are no visible yield/stop lines or other indications that traffic i... commented 2026-08-13 12:54:10 UTC by Archi_Ma ♦24 |
| 174636915 (Comments: 3) | NumisK (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi GeorgeKaplan, While working in this region in November 2025, I verified the access restrictions based on internal street-level imagery and GPS traces. I re-checked the available resources now, and the road still appears to be closed and ina... commented 2026-08-13 12:52:02 UTC by NumisK ♦18 |
| 183535718 (Comments: 1) | Marwis00 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Przydałoby się poprawić obszar lasu tak, aby nie nachodził na torowisko i żeby zamiast jednego większego było parę mniejszych, szczególnie, że teraz będą prowadzone wycinki w obrębie linii kolejowej nr 201 z uwagi na planowaną prz... commented 2026-08-13 12:49:26 UTC by PCK46 ♦9 |
| 187363226 (Comments: 1) | qeifnqenif23 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hola. Agregó todo como forest, que es el tag que se usa para bosques de cultivo, pero es claro que dentro del polígono hay matorrales de todo tipo, que no son parte del bosque, para que por favor no los incluya, pues estos pueden ser... commented 2026-08-13 12:46:09 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 186385394 (Comments: 5) | Stefan Schmors (Discussed changesets: 1) | man braucht halt einen Namen um über etwas reden zu können. ich verstehe deine Einwände, ich denke du solltest so verfahren wie es Usus ist. der Grund warum ich geschrieben habe es ist ein vorläufiger Name ist genau das wonach du ... commented 2026-08-13 12:43:16 UTC by Stefan Schmors ♦1 |
| 185650509 (Comments: 2) | Yuliya_Petrash (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi IainTurpie! I made your pedestrian smaller so that it wouldn't overlap buildings and objects, but I reverted my edits and fixed the overlap by creating relation, so that I wouldn't lose the size of your pedestrian. Thank you for payin... commented 2026-08-13 12:41:54 UTC by Yuliya_Petrash ♦8 |
| 187385792 (Comments: 1) | SamuelvVelzen (Discussed changesets: 6) | review_requested \tyes Hoi, Niks mis mee. Gr eggie commented 2026-08-13 12:38:54 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187387662 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Да, това е било имате на ул. Нишава преди 37 години. commented 2026-08-13 12:37:38 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 187367046 (Comments: 1) | qeifnqenif23 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hola. un comentario. Cuando es obvio que son edificios separados; separarlos, no dibujar todo junto. Sobre todo cuando se nota que tienen alturas distintas. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2026-08-13 12:37:36 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187386523 (Comments: 1) | EmJeeJee (Discussed changesets: 3) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar de node op de weg. Een kruisend lijntje doet niets in de navigatie. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-13 12:36:40 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 152572479 (Comments: 1) | scdhin (Discussed changesets: 23) | 您好， 17707358 这个关系，ref=trunk, 是否有误呢，是有意为之吗？请检查，谢谢 commented 2026-08-13 12:36:34 UTC by hahae ♦48 |
| 187367256 (Comments: 1) | Sebastián Rubilar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Sebastián. Puedes cuadrar las casas con la letra Q. Hacer un modelo y luego copiar y pegar. Estas se nota que están hechas a pulso. Yo lo soluciono. Saludos --- Published using ... commented 2026-08-13 12:35:38 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187387243 (Comments: 1) | tonybendell (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello Tony. Thanks for mapping. Accurately mapped. You mapped this object as 1 building despite it being on 2 parcels. Perhaps build close to each other. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549358840/history I corrected them, B... commented 2026-08-13 12:26:40 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187337256 (Comments: 3) | the100daysummer (Discussed changesets: 3) | Да, желателно е сивите да са заедно. Така или иначе вероятно ги местят напред-назад през два дена. commented 2026-08-13 12:22:36 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 187387079 (Comments: 1) | CVV2007 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-13 12:20:25 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187338343 (Comments: 2) | EBonhard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, looks fine to me, appreciated. commented 2026-08-13 12:16:03 UTC by EBonhard ♦1 |
| 187351775 (Comments: 1) | lawrencebanks (Discussed changesets: 39) | Please don't delete nodes of shops, reuse the old node. This is documented here in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history Fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187386983 Thanks! commented 2026-08-13 12:10:51 UTC by infeeeee ♦711 |
| 187382805 (Comments: 1) | Hermawan S (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kantor notaris gunakan "notary", bukan "lawyer". Tempat ibadah perlu penambahan agama. commented 2026-08-13 12:08:54 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187382197 (Comments: 1) | Sternentor (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, die Wiese hier fehlt jetzt komplett: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242732396/history Ist das bei dir noch "work in progress"? Wäre sonst schade wenn die Wiese in den Daten verloren geht :) Viele Grüße! commented 2026-08-13 12:05:00 UTC by mcliquid ♦2,095 |
| 187351552 (Comments: 1) | lawrencebanks (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hello! Please follow the wiki about multipolygons: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon It seems like you are deliberately not following editing standards. Don't map for the renderer: https://wiki.openstreetmap... commented 2026-08-13 12:04:31 UTC by infeeeee ♦711 |
| 185216971 (Comments: 2) | Calvin Menttor (Discussed changesets: 7) | well noted, sir thank you commented 2026-08-13 11:56:07 UTC by Calvin Menttor ♦5 |
| 187340625 (Comments: 1) | LegrandJ (Discussed changesets: 48) | Bonjour, Je pense ne pas être le premier à vous le signaler : vos différents changements créent de nombreux désordre dans les relations de lignes de bus. Je me doute que vous ne faites pas ça de fa&cced... commented 2026-08-13 11:52:58 UTC by Alexb60 ♦21 |
| 187384946 (Comments: 6) | Patrick Wierdsma (Discussed changesets: 3) | Idd, de gallery zit hier al 8 jaar niet meer, bestaat niet meer commented 2026-08-13 11:47:28 UTC by Patrick Wierdsma ♦2 |
| 187307843 (Comments: 2) | Jezevec (Discussed changesets: 15) | Cus, Je to napojeni 2ky na rychlostni silnici, to ze k tomu nekdo primastil odbocku na polnacku na veci nic meneni. Pokud je rec o technickych parametrech ... grc ... Jinak sem to resil proto, ze me nekolik ruznych navigaci posilalo na D8 rovn... commented 2026-08-13 11:44:41 UTC by Jezevec ♦4 |
| 187354604 (Comments: 6) | Edelsalami (Discussed changesets: 66) | Fällt dir auf das die Linien ein Muster bilden was zuläuft? Es ist eine optische Bremse - kein Rumble strip. Und rumble strips sind deutlich dicker damit man sie spürt - hier spürst du nichts. Ich bin wie man an de... commented 2026-08-13 11:42:09 UTC by flohoff ♦2,541 |
| 187335580 (Comments: 1) | siedlak90 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Jak się nie patrzy na znaki to jest dostępny. Są znaki zakazu skrętu lub znaki nakazu skrętu, by osobowymi jeździć przez tunel w ciągu ul. Działkowej. commented 2026-08-13 11:34:34 UTC by tomzyl ♦47 |
| 187010672 (Comments: 2) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi Funkmaster G, thank you for your explanation and for sharing your local knowledge about this location. I appreciate your clarification and based on your feedback, I have removed the golf=green area in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187078... commented 2026-08-13 11:32:49 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187372583 (Comments: 3) | unounoduetre (Discussed changesets: 3) | ok grazie per info commented 2026-08-13 11:30:44 UTC by unounoduetre ♦2 |
| 187382199 (Comments: 1) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dag Bosbeheerder, Er zijn nogal wat ruiterroutes onderbroken nu. https://riding.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=15.0/52.38/5.9708 Die bestaan niet meer? MVG eggie commented 2026-08-13 11:27:14 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187371339 (Comments: 3) | Glocke-Oelde (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ah cool - Danke commented 2026-08-13 11:24:57 UTC by flohoff ♦2,541 |
| 187370171 (Comments: 1) | im_tau (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Just a few things to note: 1. Separate ways are only used when roads are physically separated. 2. highway=* ways cannot cross each other without a node at the intersecting point. 3. Roundabouts don't need a oneway... commented 2026-08-13 11:21:41 UTC by TheSwavu ♦668 |
| 186435507 (Comments: 2) | GeeMaps! (Discussed changesets: 10) | I've reverted this changeset in changeset/187384526. commented 2026-08-13 11:14:54 UTC by aharvey ♦1,973 |
| 187384225 (Comments: 1) | iknowAndriu (Discussed changesets: 1) | como eu deleto? commented 2026-08-13 11:11:55 UTC by iknowAndriu ♦1 |
| 187332812 (Comments: 1) | Lumino_Fantin (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3648408660 Please don't add duplicating websites. commented 2026-08-13 11:11:20 UTC by DaveF ♦1,679 |
| 187375512 (Comments: 1) | 340or360 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-13 11:02:45 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 164113191 (Comments: 9) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 85) | Thanks for your help. The tool and the libraries it calls get gradually improved based on mapper feedback. (I'm waiting for an update of a library that should make an entry in OW disappear and I asked for LI to be included.). A new funct... commented 2026-08-13 10:58:25 UTC by 9_tab ♦111 |
| 187309207 (Comments: 4) | DJC647 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I’ve changed it to “In staff office in leisure centre”, which should allow anyone looking on the map for a defibrillator to go to the right place to get it from the staff, thanks. commented 2026-08-13 10:48:49 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,097 |
| 187255764 (Comments: 1) | siycles (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187383196 commented 2026-08-13 10:44:09 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187266201 (Comments: 2) | Рыбакова Дина (Discussed changesets: 1) | Комментарий выше немного вводит в заблуждение. Автор отменил вашу правку, чтобы после отметить, что здание снесено, чтобы никто по стары... commented 2026-08-13 10:37:17 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 187334060 (Comments: 1) | Adraxar (Discussed changesets: 3) | These road classifications are not correct commented 2026-08-13 10:36:56 UTC by MikeN ♦369 |
| 187375497 (Comments: 1) | Adraxar (Discussed changesets: 3) | These road classifications are not correct commented 2026-08-13 10:36:40 UTC by MikeN ♦369 |
| 187374677 (Comments: 1) | Adraxar (Discussed changesets: 3) | These road classifications are not correct commented 2026-08-13 10:36:21 UTC by MikeN ♦369 |
| 187249716 (Comments: 1) | StephanMarais1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187382810 commented 2026-08-13 10:35:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187362636 (Comments: 1) | 2plot (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task. PLease do not cluster adjacent buildings. Map them individually. Best regards commented 2026-08-13 10:34:20 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187130637 (Comments: 1) | ㅜУㅜанХамон (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении commented 2026-08-13 10:30:34 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 181841911 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 167) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5434968 commented 2026-08-13 10:28:45 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦932 |
| 187370460 (Comments: 1) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 25) | was that report from the summer?strava heatmap show ongoing traffic there commented 2026-08-13 10:26:05 UTC by Yog Sot ♦536 |
| 187295629 (Comments: 1) | homa333 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187382014 commented 2026-08-13 10:21:29 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 186662182 (Comments: 3) | zinderMT (Discussed changesets: 6) | Igen, ha valaha út volt, de jelenleg benőtt és átjárhatatlan, akkor az abandoned:highway=path a helyes, az így jelzett utakra nem terveznek rá az útvonaltervezők. Ha csak kerekes jármű... commented 2026-08-13 10:06:05 UTC by mgpx ♦143 |
| 187243465 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187381316 commented 2026-08-13 10:05:55 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 185611815 (Comments: 1) | Hightower112 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, wäre dann draisine=yes und usage=tourism an den entsprechenden Stücken auch noch zu entfernen? Zusammen mit railway=disused ist das nicht so richtig konsistent denke ich. Grüße commented 2026-08-13 10:02:57 UTC by onterof ♦53 |
| 187324188 (Comments: 2) | Piskvor (Discussed changesets: 79) | To dává smysl, díky za úpravu. commented 2026-08-13 10:02:20 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
| 187250826 (Comments: 1) | RowanHTL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187368804 commented 2026-08-13 09:53:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187274885 (Comments: 1) | Rafflesia arnoldii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187376162 commented 2026-08-13 09:52:25 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187297629 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 85) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187380497 commented 2026-08-13 09:51:27 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 187258328 (Comments: 1) | Carman2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187376630 commented 2026-08-13 09:50:51 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187293572 (Comments: 1) | ZirakMarwen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187377119 commented 2026-08-13 09:50:05 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 174191667 (Comments: 3) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 24) | Ca marche ! Pas de soucis, bonne journée commented 2026-08-13 09:50:02 UTC by AurélienQ ♦173 |
| 187293529 (Comments: 1) | Русланкз (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187377581 commented 2026-08-13 09:49:13 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187311602 (Comments: 1) | jacob1324 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187372582 commented 2026-08-13 09:47:53 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187311985 (Comments: 1) | adefrafafefdad (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187371840 commented 2026-08-13 09:47:07 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187259741 (Comments: 1) | Madéquis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187371746 commented 2026-08-13 09:45:31 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187379867 (Comments: 1) | artemisiaarrg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Encountered an endless conflict-check loop in Rapid Editor, so I downloaded the OSC file, resolved conflicts, and uploaded the data via JOSM. commented 2026-08-13 09:45:00 UTC by artemisiaarrg ♦2 |
| 187373537 (Comments: 1) | osmviborg (Discussed changesets: 368) | Tack! commented 2026-08-13 09:39:19 UTC by SiHaHa ♦1 |
 | 187206383 (Comments: 1) | Josipa77777 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187380035 commented 2026-08-13 09:39:13 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
 | 187369190 (Comments: 1) | mixdm (Discussed changesets: 22) | Руины Свято-Евфросиньевской церкви находятся не здесь, а восточнее, и уже отмечены. commented 2026-08-13 09:25:03 UTC by HantDX ♦68 |
| 187201387 (Comments: 2) | Patryk2710 (Discussed changesets: 106) | Chodnik, poprawiłem. Dzięki! commented 2026-08-13 09:16:48 UTC by Patryk2710 ♦27 |
| 187355702 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 26) | Did you look around? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1000961987 commented 2026-08-13 09:10:52 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,000 |
| 187320868 (Comments: 5) | Картограф-любитель (Discussed changesets: 12) | Пока в DWG внимательно наблюдают за вашими действиями, а уж в дальнейшем не обессудьте. :) commented 2026-08-13 09:05:44 UTC by Stalker61 ♦332 |
| 187355581 (Comments: 1) | osm_map_amethyst_lok (Discussed changesets: 26) | There's not ever any `=peak` here. Don't automatically use `=peak` for anything named Hill. It may be a part only. commented 2026-08-13 09:04:46 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,000 |
| 187377710 (Comments: 1) | BonSjoerd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-13 08:59:42 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 186634667 (Comments: 2) | !i! (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hi, Danke dir, hab ich gerade korrigiert. Da muss mir leider ein Fehler beim Übertragen von tags passiert sein. Gut aufgepasst :-) commented 2026-08-13 08:38:14 UTC by !i! ♦46 |
| 187341927 (Comments: 1) | ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello, ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI; Thanks for your contributions to improving OSM maps in Libya. I noticed your recent edits to Al Uoroba Highway and would appreciate it if you could share the sources you used for the updates along the section between (... commented 2026-08-13 08:26:48 UTC by mariem_mohamed ♦3 |
| 187289985 (Comments: 2) | vorobuszek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Разобрался, да, их два с разными номерами commented 2026-08-13 08:24:25 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
 | 187258855 (Comments: 1) | Old man rex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187376361 commented 2026-08-13 08:23:30 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 187337117 (Comments: 4) | Krioh86 (Discussed changesets: 1) | No track. No road. This is agricultural land that must not be driven on or walked on during the growing season except for farming. Unfortunately, in practice, no one cares about the idea that paths are declared private and therefore must not be... commented 2026-08-13 08:20:50 UTC by Krioh86 ♦1 |
| 186970207 (Comments: 2) | Madi-Red (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hi Frans S, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-08-13 08:18:47 UTC by Madi-Red ♦21 |
| 156580531 (Comments: 1) | Jejko02 (Discussed changesets: 62) | Cześć, wg tej uwagi nie ma tu parkingu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5453448 commented 2026-08-13 08:16:30 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,801 |
| 98013520 (Comments: 1) | FredrikEdler (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, I notice that you have tagged serveral trails including 438328510 with bicycle=no. I recently hiked there and I did not see any signs indicating that cycling is forbidden here. Did you misunderstand this access tag (bicycle=no means cycling forbi... commented 2026-08-13 08:14:39 UTC by anderfo ♦123 |
| 187375725 (Comments: 1) | claire00009 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping, PLease be sure that residential areas don't touch or cross buildings. These errors should be avoided. Best regards commented 2026-08-13 08:13:04 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187216100 (Comments: 1) | Давид Жолобович (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187375914 commented 2026-08-13 08:11:38 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187364610 (Comments: 1) | DW2515 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. See my previous comment on not squared buildings. Square them please. Best regards commented 2026-08-13 08:09:25 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187029685 (Comments: 1) | SPLATPLAYS (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi there. Good work on all your pedestrian mapping! I hope you don’t mind me giving you a couple of points of feedback: 1. When curving road geometry, please consider the effect it will have on routing algorithms. For example, at the int... commented 2026-08-13 08:08:35 UTC by wa_wheatbelt ♦12 |
| 185930124 (Comments: 4) | 橘ヒカリ (Discussed changesets: 9) | 而且如果你有闲心翻一下我之前几百个changeset的质量和数据精细度的话，就没必要头铁跟我在这里说什么是对的什么是错的。还不爽的话欢迎加tg群，我给你发最新的卫星图。 commented 2026-08-13 08:06:23 UTC by 橘ヒカリ ♦71 |
| 187375634 (Comments: 1) | PhysicsArmature (Discussed changesets: 28) | "denomination=fsspx" per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination#Christian_denominations commented 2026-08-13 08:04:47 UTC by PhysicsArmature ♦22 |
| 187374611 (Comments: 1) | runcio (Discussed changesets: 12) | Kas domāts ar šo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14091407071 Pārejai jau ir traffic_calming=table commented 2026-08-13 08:01:30 UTC by Colbertson ♦166 |
| 187373573 (Comments: 1) | RD COMPUTERS & CCTV (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187375421 Comment: "Remove spam" commented 2026-08-13 07:59:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,969 |
| 187373769 (Comments: 1) | RD COMPUTERS & CCTV (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187375416 Comment: "Remove spam" commented 2026-08-13 07:59:06 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,969 |
| 187373944 (Comments: 1) | RD COMPUTERS & CCTV (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187375404 Comment: "Remove spam" commented 2026-08-13 07:58:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,969 |
| 187366145 (Comments: 1) | Qwajo OSM (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Accurate mapped. Please do not the shadow of a building. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549217001/history Best regards commented 2026-08-13 07:58:32 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187363947 (Comments: 1) | DW2515 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please square the buildings you map with the Q key while still selected. Best regards commented 2026-08-13 07:55:47 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187331199 (Comments: 4) | MiniLinkPedia (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zdar, ak máš taký report chýb v názvoch, ideálne aj s popisom chyby, pošli, rád sa ujmem opráv alebo dám k nemu komentár. Tiež vďaka za tvoju snahu vylepšiť mapu, ... commented 2026-08-13 07:54:20 UTC by Tomas_J ♦402 |
| 187364821 (Comments: 1) | seav (Discussed changesets: 38) | Source is the File:The Administrative and Political Map of Metro Manila.png in Wikimedia Commons https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187374851 commented 2026-08-13 07:45:37 UTC by plato59 ♦2 |
| 187018771 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, Thanks for flagging this you're right, this was a mapping error on my side. The tags were meant for a shop in France, but they were mistakenly applied to that node in Ohio. The actual POI is this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2026-08-13 07:40:55 UTC by Digitaleo ♦22 |
| 187260709 (Comments: 1) | plato59 (Discussed changesets: 5) | It’s the boundaries used by NAMRIA. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187374593 commented 2026-08-13 07:38:26 UTC by plato59 ♦2 |
| 162368384 (Comments: 1) | snoopd0g2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/Verifiability for more information. Furthermore, the tagging here is clearly incorrect; the entire malformed shape was tagged as... commented 2026-08-13 07:24:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 108995152 (Comments: 1) | Tow Truck Brian (Discussed changesets: 2) | POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/Verifiability for more information. Furthermore, the tagging here is rather malformed. Therefore, I reverted incorrectly ... commented 2026-08-13 07:23:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187328270 (Comments: 2) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Добавям името, за да се има предвид коя е тази сграда. Като гледам сега са бутнали една будка до тоя Хранскомерс, може и още нещо да бутнат ... commented 2026-08-13 07:13:56 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦59 |
| 161041805 (Comments: 2) | Adam850 (Discussed changesets: 11) | I will implement this. commented 2026-08-13 07:09:42 UTC by Adam850 ♦7 |
| 187371849 (Comments: 2) | Melluuh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dankjewel! commented 2026-08-13 07:08:29 UTC by Melluuh ♦1 |
| 187323907 (Comments: 2) | Ysalis Ch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello & welcome! 👋If a track exists on-the-ground it is mapped in OSM. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property... commented 2026-08-13 07:01:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 187263092 (Comments: 1) | kirbypines (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-13 06:59:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187360588 (Comments: 2) | Melluuh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Info bedrijven samengevoegd met bestaande adresnodes. Format phone aangepast naar +31 ... commented 2026-08-13 06:51:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187342848 (Comments: 2) | Quasimodo (Discussed changesets: 9) | Ups - ok. commented 2026-08-13 06:50:49 UTC by Quasimodo ♦8 |
| 187329428 (Comments: 1) | Brentwood Dental Excellence (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-13 06:50:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187283390 (Comments: 1) | softpotato (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187372576 commented 2026-08-13 06:47:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187300714 (Comments: 1) | asko921841 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, deleting way/141173930 breaks the borders relation/1110762 and relation/1111142: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1110762#map=15/47.06495/39.31376 Can you please review your changes? commented 2026-08-13 06:46:13 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦74 |
| 187372462 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 66) | the roads in the indigo and tangerine development are not paved. its full of weeds its a stalled development commented 2026-08-13 06:45:30 UTC by ieguy3 ♦67 |
| 187280187 (Comments: 1) | OsterPaul (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo Paul Ich kriege da eine Fehlermeldung von der 24er Busroute. Es geht da um den Vikar Kuhn Weg. Der jetzt teilweise ein Fussweg ist. Da fährt der Bus durch. Deshalb die Fehlermeldung. Ich nehme jetzt an Du hast lokale Kenntnisse. Ich ne... commented 2026-08-13 06:43:05 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦46 |
| 187338447 (Comments: 3) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 39) | Bonjour, merci pour le forum. Je vais regarder ça sous peu. Cdlt commented 2026-08-13 06:39:27 UTC by Patrick78 ♦25 |
| 187280016 (Comments: 1) | at210 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187372084 commented 2026-08-13 06:34:22 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187177373 (Comments: 1) | mstock (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo mstock Du hast da in der Sulzerallee einige Buslinien zerstört. Mit JOSM hättest Du eine Chance zu prüfen ob die noch intakt sind. Ich habe sie geflickt. Ich überprüfe periodisch alle PTv2 Routen ob sie noch intakt s... commented 2026-08-13 06:32:52 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦46 |
| 187301937 (Comments: 1) | PittCaleb (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187371962 commented 2026-08-13 06:30:33 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187337836 (Comments: 1) | julkakulkaaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Informacje o parkingu z węzła <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14089639641> są do przeniesienia na obszar <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1549077888>. commented 2026-08-13 06:23:08 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,074 |
| 187292477 (Comments: 1) | eretyhh (Discussed changesets: 18) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187371681 commented 2026-08-13 06:21:08 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187337154 (Comments: 1) | Juzef Epszitn (Discussed changesets: 1) | 1. Zamiast landuse=garages zastosuj building=garage. 2. Do usunięcia zbędna nazwa opisowa. commented 2026-08-13 06:10:00 UTC by gscscnd ♦1,074 |
| 187277107 (Comments: 1) | Durson1983 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187371161 commented 2026-08-13 06:04:11 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187280594 (Comments: 1) | Клавдия Пляскина (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187371067 commented 2026-08-13 06:00:16 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187258740 (Comments: 1) | nlysup (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo nlysup, eine Frage zu dem Container https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1470117893 Was meinst du mit "verschlossen"? Er steht da, ist aber abgesperrt? Sowas würde dann nicht über die opening_hours markiert werden, so... commented 2026-08-13 05:55:48 UTC by söm4324 ♦71 |
| 187283557 (Comments: 1) | Gurkaran (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187370787 commented 2026-08-13 05:52:28 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187312441 (Comments: 1) | Rafael RPM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187370742 commented 2026-08-13 05:50:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187286858 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 36) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187370585 commented 2026-08-13 05:46:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187266000 (Comments: 1) | Ale Puebla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187370447 commented 2026-08-13 05:40:17 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187312131 (Comments: 1) | rcampbell_50 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187370254 commented 2026-08-13 05:30:02 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 185100979 (Comments: 2) | VA00 (Discussed changesets: 150) | Nie pamiętam, trzeba sprawdzić przy najbliższej okazji. Trochę tu namieszali jeżeli chodzi o ruch rowerowy, na SE jest nowy DDR, nie wiem co po drogiej stronie. commented 2026-08-13 05:19:04 UTC by VA00 ♦651 |
| 187209569 (Comments: 2) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi andreaboun, thank you for your feedback and for providing your local knowledge of the region to clarify the situation. Based on the sources available to me, my understanding was that San Panfilo bridge connection/part of the roundabout was car... commented 2026-08-13 05:11:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187208852 (Comments: 3) | Doug Treder (Discussed changesets: 1) | I consulted with the US OpenStreetMap community at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1786386751387859 (via https://slack.openstreetmap.us/), and the consensus from that discussion is that it is indeed correct to map the utility assigned add... commented 2026-08-13 03:55:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187319915 (Comments: 1) | Gaung Tebono (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hello Gaung Tebono, I've seen you've reverted my highway classifications. It appears to me that your highway classfications are overclassified. I will return the road back to its original classifications, thank you commented 2026-08-13 03:02:54 UTC by kevbold ♦3 |
| 187314286 (Comments: 1) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello, please check the nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314286 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14088886084#map=19/42.651570/-73.761794 for connectivity. The new mapping does not make sense there. commented 2026-08-13 03:01:08 UTC by ratrun ♦298 |
| 186738153 (Comments: 2) | Leigh (Discussed changesets: 4) | Cheers - ooops wasn't aware of that convention, but makes a lot of sense! commented 2026-08-13 02:57:44 UTC by Leigh ♦7 |
| 187366359 (Comments: 1) | Haris Nata (Discussed changesets: 1) | kalau pengaturan bahasnya pakai bahasa Indonesia, di situ ada label "gang" commented 2026-08-13 02:25:02 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187356251 (Comments: 1) | Nissan802 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Can you provide a little bit more information why you remove these footpaths? They seem to exist on the ground in the satellite views. commented 2026-08-13 02:10:23 UTC by MassCartog ♦457 |
| 187239300 (Comments: 2) | Ra_colate (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi amakarevich_lyft, Thank you for your message. I’m Upendra, working as a QC Lead at TomTom. The request for removal came via email to TomTom’s organized editing team. That email pointed to a relevant discussion in OSM US ... commented 2026-08-13 01:39:26 UTC by Geo_Cop ♦16 |
| 187238153 (Comments: 2) | Tinetto (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hi amakarevich_lyft, Thank you for your message. I’m Upendra, working as a QC Lead at TomTom. The request for removal came via email to TomTom’s organized editing team. That email pointed to a relevant discussion in OSM US ... commented 2026-08-13 01:39:01 UTC by Geo_Cop ♦16 |
| 187265288 (Comments: 2) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hi amakarevich_lyft, Thank you for your message. I’m Upendra, working as a QC Lead at TomTom. The request for removal came via email to TomTom’s organized editing team. That email pointed to a relevant discussion in OSM US ... commented 2026-08-13 01:38:37 UTC by Geo_Cop ♦16 |
| 184788727 (Comments: 1) | JerzyUrban (Discussed changesets: 18) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184788727 To ciąg pieszo-rowerowy, czy chodnik? Jeśli to drugie, to zawiera tagi bicycle=* foot=* które należy usunąć. Jeśli to pierwsze to należy zmienić na highway=path i warto do... commented 2026-08-13 01:02:32 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 186467120 (Comments: 2) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the reminder. I'm fairly new to OSM and wasn't used to knowing how to look for existing nodes at first. commented 2026-08-13 00:58:43 UTC by Tuwewanzi ♦4 |
| 187036776 (Comments: 8) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hi @SomeoneElse, thank you for the offer, but it won't be necessary for now. This edit isn't actually breaking anything, as stationery shops (ATK) and copy/print shops in Indonesia almost always operate as combined businesses. This issue ma... commented 2026-08-13 00:57:16 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187365819 (Comments: 1) | Diseret (Discussed changesets: 4) | *forêts broadleaved -> +leaf_cycle commented 2026-08-13 00:46:22 UTC by Diseret ♦11 |
| 187119676 (Comments: 2) | szulik (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bo jedyne co widać, to przejazd dla rowerów i przejścia dla pieszych na wysokości numer 39 / 40, a oznaczony jest dośc długi odcinek. commented 2026-08-13 00:35:53 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 186949229 (Comments: 2) | Scotthoffman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just out of curiosity, why is the name changed back to “Buyck Boat Ramp”? This is private property and not a public boat ramp commented 2026-08-13 00:22:22 UTC by Scotthoffman ♦1 |
| 143545896 (Comments: 2) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 12) | Richmond 31 (switching) is near the converters. This is Frankford 32. commented 2026-08-13 00:20:07 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦30 |
| 186605449 (Comments: 2) | ml824 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for fixing commented 2026-08-12 23:53:22 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦30 |
 | 176966854 (Comments: 2) | Violaine_Do (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, thank you for noticing it, i juste corrected it, have a good day! commented 2026-08-12 23:53:09 UTC by Violaine_Do ♦194 |
| 187260131 (Comments: 1) | plato59 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! I reverted your change to the Manila–Pasay border at CCP Complex. The border looks weird but it is actually correct. As documented in various places including in this 2005 Manila Times article, the border passes through Folk Arts Theater: &... commented 2026-08-12 23:49:56 UTC by seav ♦167 |
| 187325724 (Comments: 1) | Umie Mohd Hashim (Discussed changesets: 4) | Use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. Furthermore, if you are an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for f... commented 2026-08-12 23:35:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187323832 (Comments: 1) | Umie Mohd Hashim (Discussed changesets: 4) | Use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. Furthermore, if you are an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for f... commented 2026-08-12 23:34:45 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187361550 (Comments: 4) | Cheryl Transportant (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm testing around with it right now and one of the routing things tells me to go the long way around over to Bruening Drive to make a left turn onto Bristol Way, and another one of them is giving me the correct directions. I suspect the one tha... commented 2026-08-12 23:29:44 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦31 |
| 187263468 (Comments: 1) | CathyArgus (Discussed changesets: 3) | Note that per local (AU) convention, addr:postcode=*, addr:state=* and addr:suburb are determined from boundary relations rather than needed to be tagged explicitly. Also, please note the correct format of phone=* fixed in the same changeset which re... commented 2026-08-12 23:17:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187349821 (Comments: 1) | Protocol Services (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-12 22:58:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187349664 (Comments: 1) | Protocol Services (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-12 22:58:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187318472 (Comments: 1) | 500371373 (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-12 22:54:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187337331 (Comments: 1) | sudoers (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-12 22:50:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 186898931 (Comments: 2) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 169) | Sorry. I fixed the problem. commented 2026-08-12 22:48:09 UTC by Olyon ♦134 |
| 187343002 (Comments: 2) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 169) | Sorry. I fixed the problem. commented 2026-08-12 22:48:00 UTC by Olyon ♦134 |
| 187083380 (Comments: 4) | RFSK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. If only employees, suppliers (with special permit), can access there (with any form of transport), then access=private would be good. It would also be good to map gates or lift gates if there are any on these roads and apply the same tag o... commented 2026-08-12 22:47:23 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,996 |
| 187256527 (Comments: 4) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 1) | Köszi szépen a javítást és a tippet! :) commented 2026-08-12 22:46:28 UTC by 'Lex ♦2 |
| 187254972 (Comments: 4) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 232) | Tak, tu są dwie linie jednotorowe - łatwo się pomylić. Ktoś nawet raz dodał na OSM peron przy LHS na (nieczynnym) przystanku Dąbrowica k/Biłgoraja 😆 commented 2026-08-12 22:45:15 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦932 |
| 187347595 (Comments: 1) | 16000127 (Discussed changesets: 3) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-12 22:38:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187317117 (Comments: 2) | CodyNZL (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yes, sorry, it looks like that could be appropriate. commented 2026-08-12 22:37:43 UTC by CodyNZL ♦10 |
| 187363538 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 100) | Discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186424970 commented 2026-08-12 22:37:13 UTC by eerib ♦370 |
| 187195647 (Comments: 2) | welzheimerwald (Discussed changesets: 62) | In Deutschland verwenden wir "place=suburb" nicht automatisch für eine Siedlung, nur weil sie politisch zu einer größeren Stadt gehört. Im Wiki wird es am Beispiel des Tübinger Stadtteils Hirschau ganz gut erkl&aum... commented 2026-08-12 22:29:02 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦101 |
| 182467468 (Comments: 2) | Golonka43 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 3m za nim, na posesji. Mała budka nie oznaczona na mapie. Podobnie jak Lodziarnia. commented 2026-08-12 22:23:42 UTC by Golonka43 ♦1 |
| 183230562 (Comments: 4) | Demido (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hatte es im Backlog. Danke, dass du es schon geändert hast. commented 2026-08-12 22:22:47 UTC by Demido ♦5 |
| 187290629 (Comments: 4) | Eisenbahner Uwe (Discussed changesets: 41) | A route=rail kapcsolathoz a vasúti vágányon kívül nem adunk hozzá más elemet, ahogy azt a lenti wiki-linken is olvashaatod. Emiatt már figyelmeztettünk, de te nem törődtél vele.<... commented 2026-08-12 22:15:55 UTC by balint36 ♦290 |
| 187249824 (Comments: 1) | Eisenbahner Uwe (Discussed changesets: 41) | Magyar épületek nevét (name) mindig magyarul add meg, kérlek ilyenek esetében mellőzd a németet. Német név megadására a name:de címke alkalmas - már ha valóban ... commented 2026-08-12 22:09:47 UTC by balint36 ♦290 |
| 187248313 (Comments: 1) | Eisenbahner Uwe (Discussed changesets: 41) | Honnan tudod, hogy műemlékvédelem alatt áll? A muemlekem.hu oldal nem listázza. How do you know it is under monument protection? The muemlekem.hu website does not list it. Woher wissen Sie, dass es unter Den... commented 2026-08-12 22:08:38 UTC by balint36 ♦290 |
| 187248088 (Comments: 1) | Eisenbahner Uwe (Discussed changesets: 41) | Magyar épületek nevét (name) mindig magyarul add meg, kérlek ilyenek esetében mellőzd a németet. Német név megadására a name:de címke alkalmas - már ha valóban ... commented 2026-08-12 22:05:33 UTC by balint36 ♦290 |
| 181738230 (Comments: 1) | Falsetax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Falsetax, die meisten der von dir gemappten Parkflächen in der Zehntenhof-Siedlung sind nur für Anwohner mit Parkausweis, steht groß dran. Das sollte noch drangetaggt werden, damit OSM-Nutzer auf der Suche nach einem Parkplatz sich... commented 2026-08-12 21:57:01 UTC by FraukeLeo ♦304 |
| 187249100 (Comments: 1) | Eisenbahner Uwe (Discussed changesets: 41) | How beautiful Hungarian word is the "Bahnhof Kiskunmajsä"... Oh wait... it isn't Hungarian... commented 2026-08-12 21:50:43 UTC by balint36 ♦290 |
| 148392510 (Comments: 1) | jogro14 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi jogro14, wäre es dir möglich, dich um https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5344712 zu kümmern? Soweit ich sehe, hast du den Way hier vor zwei Jahren aufgeteilt. SC zeigt jetzt offenbar zwei separate Inseln an, wegen der zwei crossings... commented 2026-08-12 21:47:07 UTC by FraukeLeo ♦304 |
| 186100089 (Comments: 1) | Stephanievanr (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi Stephanievanr, This fixes the name, but in reality it is very generic and should have been removed instead. commented 2026-08-12 21:41:12 UTC by Enock4seth ♦657 |
| 131602501 (Comments: 1) | johnmccullough (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10576401842/ Where is this located? I can't see any defibrillator here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1451535742789815&focus=photo The mapped point is not opposite the mart an... commented 2026-08-12 21:40:14 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 187230453 (Comments: 3) | julianminus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für die ausführliche Rückmeldung :) Denke dann passt das (wenn tracktype entfernt wird). Freue mich über jedes Paar Augen welches hier hilft 👍🏻 commented 2026-08-12 21:37:45 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,226 |
| X | 187344567 (Comments: 2) | felixcrux (Discussed changesets: 1) | @felixcrux: It looks like you had mapped a church in Toronto with StreetComplete and did not upload your data before you travelled to Sweden and mapped a church there. As a consequence, we now see an upload containing edits over two continents... commented 2026-08-12 21:33:25 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,020 |
| 186975056 (Comments: 1) | ENGO 6357 (Discussed changesets: 4) | The junction number does not exist on the ground and has been reverted. Please do not add things that do not exist in law or on the ground. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187362005 commented 2026-08-12 21:31:50 UTC by ika-chan! ♦424 |
| 161265129 (Comments: 1) | 78trys (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wrong location, the flock camera is on the other side of the overpass. commented 2026-08-12 21:28:53 UTC by WalterMoore ♦1 |
| 187290991 (Comments: 1) | Eisenbahner Uwe (Discussed changesets: 41) | Sorry but which part isn't understandasble that in Hungary we don't speak German. I have to revert all your changesets... again becuse everytiing you've just done is simply bad. commented 2026-08-12 21:24:47 UTC by balint36 ♦290 |
| 187261325 (Comments: 4) | Richmond Golfer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, no worries. The wiki pages can be confusing at times, especially to new users. The same concept applies across the board. If you were to map the outline of a backyard swimming pool and tag it “leisure=swimming _pool” or whatever t... commented 2026-08-12 21:18:37 UTC by b-jazz ♦920 |
| 186817443 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 423) | thank you commented 2026-08-12 21:03:57 UTC by MrAnderson ♦7 |
| 187360725 (Comments: 1) | Melluuh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij osm, Probeer svo op de adresnode bij te taggen.. Gr eggie commented 2026-08-12 21:02:15 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 185635204 (Comments: 2) | Tomding (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry it must be. I worked from an older version of the map. Thanks for tracking it down. commented 2026-08-12 20:52:52 UTC by Tomding ♦1 |
| 185898246 (Comments: 1) | yael kann (Discussed changesets: 1) | בבקשה לא לשנות את השם, השם הנכון הוא עין לימור ועין לימון מוגדר כבר בתור שם אלטנטיבי. כל שינוי סתם שובר את התגיות. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... commented 2026-08-12 20:48:31 UTC by hatul ♦504 |
| 169997197 (Comments: 7) | Jaka Kranjc (Discussed changesets: 6) | That would be great! commented 2026-08-12 20:47:06 UTC by scabiosa_trenta ♦12 |
| 177671444 (Comments: 1) | shogun (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi shogun, ich war heute vor Ort und konnte keine Sparkassenfiliale mehr entdecken außer einem Überweisungsbriefkasten. Hast du eine Idee, wie man die Sparkassenfiliale dahingehend abändert? Ich konnte leider kein Foto machen, weil ic... commented 2026-08-12 20:43:39 UTC by havogel ♦2 |
| 185771900 (Comments: 1) | Map_Moderator (Discussed changesets: 6) | שלום, כמוש כתבנו בעריכות אחרות, בבקשה לא לשנות ללא סיבה https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187360372 commented 2026-08-12 20:41:38 UTC by hatul ♦504 |
| 187229979 (Comments: 2) | julianminus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo, Danke für die Nachfrage. Tatsächlich hatte ich nur den nördlichsten Teil der Straße gemeint, den ich als durchaus gut ausgebaute Gemeindeverbindungsstraße empfunden habe. Aber wenn es im Gesamtkontext keinen Sinn... commented 2026-08-12 20:40:15 UTC by julianminus ♦2 |
| 187309534 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 319) | Ahoj, bolo to robené manuálne. Keďže jeden objekt menil aj 3x, tak som sa to snažil vracať postupne. commented 2026-08-12 20:30:05 UTC by mapperue ♦244 |
| 187355881 (Comments: 1) | WillatWenny (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing! I just wanted to let you know that we cannot use (most!) modern Ordnance Survey maps or things like Royal Mail as their licences/copyright are not compatible with OpenStreetMap. It&#... commented 2026-08-12 20:27:55 UTC by ceirios ♦137 |
| 187334525 (Comments: 1) | Amy Sunshine Real Estate Broker (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-12 20:22:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 183841159 (Comments: 2) | Marek_P (Discussed changesets: 29) | Ale wiesz, zastanawiam się nad tym od jakiegoś czasu i jednak uważam, że często, szczególnie na terenach zabudowanych, ta kolizja jest usprawiedliwiona. Ciąg drzew to mimo wszystko nie ogrodzenie czy żywopłot i często między poszczeg... commented 2026-08-12 20:20:31 UTC by Marek_P ♦26 |
| 187276258 (Comments: 2) | Murphy1208 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Den Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14087237822 hast du wieso auf die längst erfasste Flächen-PV-Anlage gesetzt? commented 2026-08-12 20:09:09 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 187275935 (Comments: 2) | Murphy1208 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hiernach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Civil_Protection_Areas#Why_use_the_emergency:*_namespace? wäre das nur ein Zusatztagging - d.h. ohne Parkplatz muss das wieder raus. commented 2026-08-12 20:03:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 187358379 (Comments: 1) | WieKo68 (Discussed changesets: 516) | Gnieźnieńskiej? commented 2026-08-12 19:57:17 UTC by VJMK ♦17 |
| 170403301 (Comments: 2) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187358521 commented 2026-08-12 19:50:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 170400246 (Comments: 1) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187358521 commented 2026-08-12 19:50:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 170403089 (Comments: 2) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187358521 commented 2026-08-12 19:50:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 170402716 (Comments: 2) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187358521 commented 2026-08-12 19:50:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 170403944 (Comments: 2) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187358521 commented 2026-08-12 19:50:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 170402123 (Comments: 2) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187358521 commented 2026-08-12 19:50:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 170401048 (Comments: 1) | sanxalp (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187358521 commented 2026-08-12 19:50:07 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,649 |
| 187094281 (Comments: 2) | Murphy1208 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hier hast du zusätzlich die Lage eines Bachlaufs verändert - ist das beabsichtigt? commented 2026-08-12 19:49:12 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 186471304 (Comments: 2) | Eisenbahner Uwe (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ment a bejelentés, mert nem tűnik túl együttműködőnek. commented 2026-08-12 19:46:06 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 187272622 (Comments: 2) | Murphy1208 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, ich bezweifle, dass der Hydrant blau ist. Nur zur Klarstellung: Das ist die Farbe, die der Hydrant vor Ort hat. Das hat nichts mit der Darstellung in Karten oder Apps zu tun. Viele Grüße commented 2026-08-12 19:45:32 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 186224119 (Comments: 1) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 25) | Could you please write changeset comments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-08-12 19:44:43 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 184739043 (Comments: 1) | Mikołaj D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dlaczego usunąłeś tagi oneway z torowisk? commented 2026-08-12 19:42:02 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 179027072 (Comments: 1) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 34) | Oi, é importante sempre checar se as vias estão conectadas uma as outras, pfvr tenha mais cuidado commented 2026-08-12 19:41:31 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦89 |
| 184491674 (Comments: 1) | LimoniusAugustus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Proszę nie usuwać oneway = yes z torowisk. Poprawne tagowanie torów tramwajowych w budowie to construction:railway = tram + railway = construction, analogicznie z nieużywanymi torami. commented 2026-08-12 19:40:05 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 187275366 (Comments: 1) | Janis Stiga RM (Discussed changesets: 1) | service=driveway ir paredzēts piebracamajiem ceļiem uz vienu atsevišķu māju vai īpašumu. Lietot to ceļam kas brauc cauri apdzīvotai vietai ir pilnīgi nepareizi. Ja ir kādi iemesli kāpēc kokvedējs šeit nedrīks... commented 2026-08-12 19:39:56 UTC by kaposts ♦7 |
| 186960087 (Comments: 2) | Eisenbahner Uwe (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi. Please use the actual, on-site Hungarian names for features in Hungary. You may add German names in name:de=* but it's not necessary. commented 2026-08-12 19:35:12 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 187215363 (Comments: 1) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 25) | Could you please write changeset comments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-08-12 19:34:46 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
 | 187096654 (Comments: 3) | bibi6 (Discussed changesets: 19) | amenity = car_repair is not the same as service = car_repair. You removed amenity = car_repair, why? Did you check all of these premises in Brazil and Africa? commented 2026-08-12 19:33:44 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 187343436 (Comments: 1) | GraceZ17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Access tags are for describing legal usage of highways rather than common usage. Horses and bikes are allowed on all public roads other than freeways in Michigan unless specifically prohibited by local laws or signage. commented 2026-08-12 19:28:11 UTC by bjanevic ♦3 |
| 186883585 (Comments: 1) | TomodachiLuna (Discussed changesets: 1) | You asked us to review your changes: Your edit was reverted - there is no such maxspeed as 25 km/h and we don't connect high-voltage lines to roads. Also, please write in the changeset comment what changes you made: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-08-12 19:25:30 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 186804306 (Comments: 1) | Mitix06 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dlaczego usuwasz tagi oneway z torowisk? commented 2026-08-12 19:15:29 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 186795734 (Comments: 1) | Farot (Discussed changesets: 21) | Could you use Polish or English when you edit Poland? No one here understands Occitan. commented 2026-08-12 19:14:15 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 186732289 (Comments: 1) | geoccitania (Discussed changesets: 1) | Could you use Polish or English when you edit Poland? No one here understands Occitan. commented 2026-08-12 19:13:46 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 186282186 (Comments: 1) | palycka (Discussed changesets: 25) | Could you please write changeset comments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-08-12 19:12:27 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 186359864 (Comments: 1) | Poprawiłem (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you! commented 2026-08-12 19:10:32 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 186356200 (Comments: 1) | Poprawiłem (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you! commented 2026-08-12 19:09:06 UTC by maro21 ♦922 |
| 187252744 (Comments: 1) | Aiden Kelly (Discussed changesets: 4) | This does not appear to be mapped appropriately commented 2026-08-12 19:03:34 UTC by ICT_maps ♦16 |
| 187258476 (Comments: 5) | DoubleBear (Discussed changesets: 2) | I had a chat with user:agrifolia about these, as he originally entered these data. They have been changed to desire paths. No need to follow-up; happy mapping! commented 2026-08-12 18:50:58 UTC by stevea ♦325 |
| 187214188 (Comments: 2) | zsoooc (Discussed changesets: 4) | Szia! Megvan nálam az egész országra, az összes réteg (nem csak a fokozottan védett). https://turistaterkepek.hu/portal/home/ ez a forrás, de engedélyt nem kértem hozzá. Ez&ea... commented 2026-08-12 18:49:44 UTC by zsoooc ♦4 |
| 187253322 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Rapid Camp (node/8301666440) + Saddle Camp (node/8301666439). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:53 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187253308 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Trail Flat (node/8301666442) + Elkhorn Bar (node/8301666441). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:47 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187253107 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Little Camas dispersed campsite 5684798493 (node/5684798493) + Little Camas dispersed campsite 5684795875 (node/5684795875). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verifie... commented 2026-08-12 18:47:43 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252842 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Chinook Bay Campground (way/1188750453) + Salmon River Campground (way/897299375). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:39 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252818 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Lola Creek Campground (way/1105423588) + Beaver Creek Campground (way/1534463786). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:34 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252804 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Casino Creek Campground (way/897299376) + Mormon Bend Campground (way/897299377). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-12 18:47:30 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 147163312 (Comments: 3) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 187) | Som jeg læser wiki-siden, fortælles det bare at en række af træer *ofte* fungerer som vindbælte. (Og der er i hvert fald grund til at have et Mærke for en generel træ-række, så man kan sæ... commented 2026-08-12 18:41:43 UTC by cyclist789 ♦95 |
| 103591872 (Comments: 1) | TimothyOnline (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello, it looks like this building has been named "Herndon". Was this on purpose? commented 2026-08-12 18:33:05 UTC by BCary ♦2 |
| 28668893 (Comments: 4) | b-holdet (Discussed changesets: 82) | PS: De lange vand-tunneler på SDFI Screenmap (og på kortoverblik.dk) er vist ikke særligt præcise eller pålidelige, så jeg tegner dem kun på, når jeg har tjekket på højdekort at de ikke tro... commented 2026-08-12 18:30:25 UTC by cyclist789 ♦95 |
| 187351253 (Comments: 1) | Binba6u6a (Discussed changesets: 1) | ما شاء الله تعديل مثري لكن ملاحظة على نوع المبنى يفضل استخدام building = retail building = commercial يستخدم للمباني المكتبية commented 2026-08-12 18:20:04 UTC by Alshowaiey ♦31 |
| 187354671 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 178) | Може би южната част на релсите трябва да се дръпне на север още малко? commented 2026-08-12 18:17:01 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 187334024 (Comments: 4) | SamuelvVelzen (Discussed changesets: 6) | dat weet ik niet, ik zag alleen een intercom met een camera gericht op het hek. niet geprobeerd om het hek open te doen. maar ik kon hem iig niet zelf open maken was een groot mechanische schuifhek (harderwijkerweg) mapse is een leuke ... commented 2026-08-12 18:11:14 UTC by SamuelvVelzen ♦4 |
| 187283396 (Comments: 1) | polski ziemniak (Discussed changesets: 7) | Błędna kombinacja znaczników (construction+proposed). Wycofuję. commented 2026-08-12 18:06:54 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦980 |
| 187354258 (Comments: 1) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 67) | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187283396 commented 2026-08-12 18:06:46 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦980 |
| 187306394 (Comments: 1) | Zbigniew_Cz (Discussed changesets: 74) | Cześć, po co node szkoły, skoro jest obszar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309982294? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Jeden_obiekt,_jeden_element_OSM commented 2026-08-12 18:04:21 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦932 |
| 187038419 (Comments: 2) | Túllio (Discussed changesets: 38) | Na quase totalidade eu utilizo "park" me baseando na descrição em pt que se refere a áreas verdes, pois em geral a maioria das praças no Brasil são bem arborizadas, com muita grama e tudo mais, além... commented 2026-08-12 18:03:08 UTC by Túllio ♦61 |
| 187354018 (Comments: 1) | pierfrancescop (Discussed changesets: 5) | #solareclipse commented 2026-08-12 17:59:02 UTC by pierfrancescop ♦5 |
| 187335920 (Comments: 7) | Rémi_ (Discussed changesets: 20) | Oui mais encore faut-il qu'on ait l'assurance que le point soit bien de la marque ! À la main c'est assez facile, mais un robot aura plus de mal. Des discussions sont en cours sur le forum. commented 2026-08-12 17:57:03 UTC by Rémi_ ♦26 |
| 187316081 (Comments: 3) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 8) | No, no issue here and I see how splitting could be better for routing in this case. Just checking that you're not planning to split every path at every trail intersection commented 2026-08-12 17:49:02 UTC by ion_chi ♦86 |
| 187129708 (Comments: 4) | SamuelvVelzen (Discussed changesets: 6) | Met landuse bedoel ik de vlakken die je ziet. bv landuse=grass of meadow Voor akkers landuse=farmland Links zie je landuse=industrial voor een bedrijventerrein. Ik kijk dan naar recente luchtfoto's. Je zier dan de grenzen tussen... commented 2026-08-12 17:39:32 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| X | 187334526 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 181) | Thank you commented 2026-08-12 17:38:21 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦37 |
| X | 187334602 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 181) | Thank you commented 2026-08-12 17:37:51 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦37 |
| 177397664 (Comments: 7) | welzheimerwald (Discussed changesets: 62) | Dann müsste der "waterway=river" bei Köln "name=Niederrhein" heißen. Tut er aber nicht. Es ist immernoch der Rhein und man hat die abschnittsweisen bezeichnungen (Vorderrhein,Alpenrhein,Hochrhein,Oberrhein etc.) li... commented 2026-08-12 17:31:24 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦101 |
| 187332923 (Comments: 1) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 39) | Bonjour et merci pour les màj ATP. Pourquoi l'un des magasins est en shop telecommunication et pas mobile_phone comme les autres? Cela se voit par l'icone des noeuds qui ne sont pas tous identiques. Je suppose que ce champ devrait &... commented 2026-08-12 17:18:25 UTC by Patrick78 ♦25 |
 | 187351749 (Comments: 1) | EarlEBird (Discussed changesets: 12) | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2026-10-05 commented 2026-08-12 17:09:12 UTC by EarlEBird ♦11 |
| 187345580 (Comments: 5) | Daan Schuurmans (Discussed changesets: 4) | De rijstrookbegeleiding bij Drempt heb ik teruggezet. Svp niet als starter de tun:lanes en lanes gaan aanpassen zonder enige kennis. het gaf nu een foutmelding. Dat zijn allemaal zeer ervaren mappers die zich hier mee bezig houden. MVG e... commented 2026-08-12 17:06:31 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 180412589 (Comments: 3) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the reply! The usual tag would be 'ref', or maybe 'bridge:ref' (those two are used very often). If you really want to make clear that it's about the "skyways", you might also want 'ref:skyway&#... commented 2026-08-12 17:02:11 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 168405297 (Comments: 1) | Corsa5 (Discussed changesets: 158) | highway=road не проходит валидацию commented 2026-08-12 16:48:13 UTC by skadi ♦21 |
| 187111272 (Comments: 1) | Osmgimmy (Discussed changesets: 1) | the size of this changeset bounding box man commented 2026-08-12 16:46:56 UTC by dmjab13 ♦131 |
| 187350214 (Comments: 1) | dmjab13 (Discussed changesets: 3) | sorry, i connected some land use directly to the lehigh river! commented 2026-08-12 16:45:00 UTC by dmjab13 ♦131 |
| 187346211 (Comments: 1) | Daan Schuurmans (Discussed changesets: 4) | Richting aangepast Wat was je bedoeling? De Vossenburcht heb ik uitgelijnd. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-12 16:43:35 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187346039 (Comments: 2) | Daan Schuurmans (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted by changeset #187350443 commented 2026-08-12 16:40:02 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187345738 (Comments: 1) | Daan Schuurmans (Discussed changesets: 4) | .. en hoe zit het met de uitzondering voor tweewielers hier? Ik heb oneway:bicycle=no toegevoegd MVG eggie commented 2026-08-12 16:35:20 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
 | 179368591 (Comments: 1) | Carlos Tenesaca Pacheco (Discussed changesets: 1) | ¿Piensan hacer algo con esta enorme cantidad de objetos sin etiquetar y que no se muestran en ningún sitio? Esto a pesar de que muchos de ellos ya están ocupados por edificios. commented 2026-08-12 16:31:26 UTC by mike140 ♦389 |
| 187307504 (Comments: 2) | risson67 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Voir toutes tes erreurs ici https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.42896&lat=48.40738&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_mul... commented 2026-08-12 16:29:17 UTC by Yunan973 ♦149 |
| 187340393 (Comments: 1) | rvaudois_54 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Nativement, les pistes cyclables sont interdites aux piétons, il n’est pas nécessaire de l’expliciter. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#France Bien co... commented 2026-08-12 16:28:16 UTC by Axelos ♦117 |
| 186124670 (Comments: 5) | Outsidertwo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Írtam neki PM-et 3 napja. Szerintem esélytelen. 🤷 commented 2026-08-12 16:26:16 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 173702642 (Comments: 2) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hi JeroenvanderGun, Thank you for reaching out and clarifying the situation. Seems like a misinterpretation of lane markings on my end. I see clearer now that even though the lane markings allow merging traffic to change lanes towards left, my ed... commented 2026-08-12 16:24:03 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187116375 (Comments: 2) | whitepanda (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi lakedistrict, Thank you for sharing your observations and recent Mapillary imagery. I see that I misinterpreted the zig-zag markings as a traffic calming measure. Your message and the clarification is much appreciated. I see that the traffic_c... commented 2026-08-12 16:23:59 UTC by whitepanda ♦41 |
| 186866125 (Comments: 2) | M!dgard (Discussed changesets: 155) | 👀 commented 2026-08-12 16:17:05 UTC by M!dgard ♦811 |
| 187343506 (Comments: 2) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you for sharing your valuable feedback. The new protected bikeway is currently planned only between Nicollet and LaSalle for several reasons: This segment of Grant Street is part of the All Ages and Abilities Network, which guides th... commented 2026-08-12 16:11:15 UTC by Huong Dang ♦5 |
| 187181526 (Comments: 4) | Komet (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, ich trage in Zukunft ref:hochgehberge für hochgehberge Wegweiser ein und habe die letzten Einträge angepasst https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187345846 commented 2026-08-12 15:22:03 UTC by Komet ♦15 |
| 187345019 (Comments: 3) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fixed duplicated ways.. Fixed almost junction. commented 2026-08-12 15:15:56 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 181453186 (Comments: 3) | bahnpirat (Discussed changesets: 75) | Ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187346014 umgesetzt. commented 2026-08-12 15:14:06 UTC by bahnpirat ♦29 |
| 185831769 (Comments: 1) | tbaur (Discussed changesets: 1) | It makes sense to map the hotel on the outline like you did here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104371305 , but then move all the relevant tags to that larger outline. In this case there is only a single address, so not just the name but also the ... commented 2026-08-12 15:04:05 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,527 |
| 185644582 (Comments: 1) | Avaq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Did you confirm locally it is open? The same place was marked as closed two years ago. commented 2026-08-12 15:02:34 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,527 |
| 186074506 (Comments: 1) | Tommy300952 (Discussed changesets: 3) | For a place like this, use "caravan site", not camping. Ironically, add caravan=no (they are indeed prohibited according to the site you used) and since it is actually built for motorhomes, add motohomes=designated I already fixed it. |
| 187344865 (Comments: 1) | Province Hill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Posted by Art J on 8/12/2026. commented 2026-08-12 14:52:57 UTC by Province Hill ♦1 |
| 187242615 (Comments: 1) | TG-map4 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi! please do NOT delete a POI to create a new one. OSM loves history of POIs. Next time simply change the tags please. Greets --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187242615 |
| 186568548 (Comments: 1) | LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Volgens https://www.martinshotels.com/nl/page/martins-klooster/martins-klooster-4-hotel-leuven-officiele-website.11057.html moet dat Martin's Klooster, niet Gasthuis zijn, kan dat? commented 2026-08-12 14:48:40 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,527 |
| 141278556 (Comments: 1) | gdahora (Discussed changesets: 2) | cuidado ao usar IA, muitas vezes dar falsos positivos no caso de rios e ribeiros se precisar de ajuda entre em contato att. Gustavo commented 2026-08-12 14:46:46 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦89 |
| 150838478 (Comments: 1) | Peter Elderson (Discussed changesets: 118) | Hoi Peter, Er zitten nogal wat onderbrekingen nu in dat ruiternetwerk. Vermoedelijk na actie van beheerder. Paden zijn verdwenen. Geen idee hoe die routes nu lopen. Af en toe kom je no stukjes tegen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/use... commented 2026-08-12 14:46:18 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 185209201 (Comments: 2) | SCMapper9947 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Ok, I will do so in my next edits commented 2026-08-12 14:37:09 UTC by SCMapper9947 ♦7 |
| 187341123 (Comments: 1) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 5) | Beste Op meer plaatsen zijn ruiterroutes nu onderbroken. Hoe lopen die routes dan nu? MVG eggie commented 2026-08-12 14:34:05 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187342447 (Comments: 1) | okadatsuneo_import (Discussed changesets: 20) | 52330703が正 commented 2026-08-12 14:33:38 UTC by okadatsuneo ♦94 |
| 187342424 (Comments: 1) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 5) | Tip.. Probeer te voorkomen dat je landuse overlap krijgt. Dus vlakken op vlakken. Dat geeft foutmeldingen. Ik heb wat hersteld. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-12 14:30:50 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 185769457 (Comments: 2) | Map_Moderator (Discussed changesets: 6) | P.S., the name:en tag is for English names. Please do not use it for Hebrew names. commented 2026-08-12 14:30:21 UTC by zstadler ♦1,149 |
| 140777669 (Comments: 1) | equipeobrac2023if (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi obrigado pela contribuição mas devesse ter cuidado ao usar o rapid em areas tão isoladas muitas vezes dar falsos positivos e para areas isoladas como essas que você mapeou que o acesso se dar muito por transporte areo e ... commented 2026-08-12 14:28:32 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦89 |
| 184430600 (Comments: 1) | Map_Moderator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Map_Moderator, Thank you for your contribution to OSM. The https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184430799#c1643111 comment applies here too: - This path exists on the ground, as can be also seen in https://www.govmap.gov.il/... commented 2026-08-12 14:25:11 UTC by zstadler ♦1,149 |
| 187340094 (Comments: 1) | Bosbeheerder RV (Discussed changesets: 5) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Soms is het verstandig om paden die dichtgroeien eerst te taggen als disused:highway=track of path Dat voorkomt o... commented 2026-08-12 14:25:05 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187313199 (Comments: 1) | defaultfox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Edit reviewed, it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187313199 commented 2026-08-12 14:19:59 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦3 |
| X | 183666987 (Comments: 1) | Sharon Ndhlovu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this an incorrect deletion of the Soul Bouy? commented 2026-08-12 14:17:35 UTC by MarcinMound ♦3 |
| 35459932 (Comments: 1) | floyd70 (Discussed changesets: 2) | addr:postcode 1214 commented 2026-08-12 14:06:15 UTC by BrunoSIlvaCH ♦1 |
| 180335666 (Comments: 1) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 61) | Please specify the source of these heights. Please make it a habit to specify the sources of anything you add in the future! commented 2026-08-12 13:59:34 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 16444682 (Comments: 1) | hurdygurdyman (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/b-31-im-hollental-trunk-oder-primary/146402 commented 2026-08-12 13:51:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 23273162 (Comments: 1) | skyper (Discussed changesets: 72) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/b-31-im-hollental-trunk-oder-primary/146402 commented 2026-08-12 13:51:26 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 30740004 (Comments: 1) | gnlpfth (Discussed changesets: 58) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/b-31-im-hollental-trunk-oder-primary/146402 commented 2026-08-12 13:50:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 78018798 (Comments: 1) | Chrisss Gü (Discussed changesets: 28) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/b-31-im-hollental-trunk-oder-primary/146402 commented 2026-08-12 13:50:39 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 81606806 (Comments: 2) | q_un_go (Discussed changesets: 124) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/b-31-im-hollental-trunk-oder-primary/146402 commented 2026-08-12 13:50:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187175822 (Comments: 1) | carsee (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/b-31-im-hollental-trunk-oder-primary/146402 commented 2026-08-12 13:49:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187330659 (Comments: 1) | Istvan Kasler (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Istvan Kasler, der Haltepunkt hat mit absicht not:public_transport=platform, da diese seperat gemapped ist. Ebenso behinhalter psv auch Taxis, hier sollten jedoch nur busse erlaubt sein. commented 2026-08-12 13:37:43 UTC by cowboyxup ♦38 |
| 180460717 (Comments: 1) | Lenskha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Logique totalement fausse. En l'occurrence la ligne n'est pas ouverte mais les infrastructures décrites sur OSM existent bel et bien. Si la ligne n'est pas ouverte c'est uniquement car se déroulent les protocole d... commented 2026-08-12 13:37:27 UTC by AurélienQ ♦173 |
| 184236184 (Comments: 1) | GabiruX_ (Discussed changesets: 41) | BR-102??? commented 2026-08-12 13:36:03 UTC by Sxi_ ♦5 |
| 187318053 (Comments: 2) | Moulay Abdellah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset/187340466 commented 2026-08-12 13:35:16 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187202565 (Comments: 1) | סטיב המגניב (Discussed changesets: 1) | ברוכים הבאים סטיב ותודה רבה על התרומה למפה! הערה קטנה: נא להימנע משמות תאוריים. שם תקין זה מה שרואים על שלט, דוגמה: חיפה, מקדונלדס. דוגמה... commented 2026-08-12 13:31:09 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 187340705 (Comments: 1) | Tomuus (Discussed changesets: 1) | The phone number was written in front of the store, there's a low chance I misremembered it commented 2026-08-12 13:29:21 UTC by Tomuus ♦1 |
| 184430799 (Comments: 1) | Map_Moderator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Map_Moderator, Thank you for your contributions to OSM. Please be careful when changing or deleting other mapper's work. I have used this path, and so have many hikers, as can be seen in the GPS traces uploaded to OSM.... commented 2026-08-12 13:27:43 UTC by zstadler ♦1,149 |
| 187317997 (Comments: 2) | Moulay Abdellah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187340466 commented 2026-08-12 13:26:47 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 186924109 (Comments: 1) | xosegarciaaugusto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Por favor, no uses OSM para notas personales. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186924109 commented 2026-08-12 13:26:36 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦370 |
| 187311529 (Comments: 2) | dontonio (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, de acuerdo! Saludos commented 2026-08-12 13:21:49 UTC by dontonio ♦1 |
| 161017731 (Comments: 2) | mapserver (Discussed changesets: 2) | The source was indeed Bing. However, I mapped the geometry extremely roughly. My reasoning was that a very rough area is better than having no information at all. If someone has better geometry data, they can improve it or replace it entirely. commented 2026-08-12 13:21:34 UTC by mapserver ♦3 |
| 187207915 (Comments: 2) | itamas80 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Igen, majd az aluljárót is megcsinálom. commented 2026-08-12 13:18:06 UTC by itamas80 ♦4 |
| 187294255 (Comments: 2) | Rafael RPM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Obrigado. commented 2026-08-12 13:12:56 UTC by Rafael RPM ♦1 |
| 184876277 (Comments: 1) | leogomeslima (Discussed changesets: 1) | Olá. Você não pode marcar os edifícios técnicos das operadoras como estações. Tudo isso será revertido. commented 2026-08-12 13:00:44 UTC by Nighto ♦24 |
| 187338815 (Comments: 1) | nl-mapper (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bing Maps and VBMP Most Recent Imagery was used for this edit. commented 2026-08-12 12:58:14 UTC by nl-mapper ♦5 |
| 187309150 (Comments: 3) | DJC647 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks, I’ve updated the location description to say that commented 2026-08-12 12:56:36 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,097 |
| 185694522 (Comments: 9) | LachlanWignall (Discussed changesets: 1) | The court hire website shows four tennis courts, and it seems like JJRAC also operates the three north ones in https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=884612078378020 Maybe all four tennis courts are operated by JJRAC, but the north three were... commented 2026-08-12 12:55:34 UTC by Joel Koen ♦42 |
| 187335601 (Comments: 1) | siedlak90 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Udowodnij proszę, że nie ma znaków zakazujących pokonanie tego przejazdu przez wszystkich uczestników ruchu. Nie jest legalne pokonywanie tego przejazdu pojazdami innymi niż samochody ciężarowe. MZDW po zgłoszeniu przez... commented 2026-08-12 12:42:33 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 187333921 (Comments: 1) | danieldebari (Discussed changesets: 4) | Daniël Lijkt me oke. Renderen doet het niet op de standaardkaart. wellicht wel op andere kaarten. Het is correct gemapt zo en vindbaar. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-12 12:37:14 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187335496 (Comments: 2) | tetravel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Adresnode verwijderd. Dat adres is niet hier. commented 2026-08-12 12:35:34 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187336217 (Comments: 1) | tetravel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je hebt hier ook een adresnode verplaatst. Was dat de bedoeling? Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=187336217 MVG eggie commented 2026-08-12 12:33:09 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187322748 (Comments: 1) | lawrencebanks (Discussed changesets: 39) | No, roofs are above the surface, you shouldn't include them in the multipolygon of the highway. Please think before you edit, @NightH already fixed this malformed relation. Don't map for the renderer.... You are messing up all the s... commented 2026-08-12 12:31:37 UTC by infeeeee ♦711 |
| 187335385 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | two issues here, first of all the name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this ca... commented 2026-08-12 12:31:20 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 186565935 (Comments: 5) | changchun_1 (Discussed changesets: 53) | Die Antwort ist heute eingetroffen. Die Straßenverkehrsbehörde sieht den Weg als Gehweg und mangels Beschwerdelage keinen Anlass, weitere Verkehrszeichen aufzustellen. Ich habe daher bicycle=yes durch bicycle=no und traffic_sign=none erset... commented 2026-08-12 12:29:29 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,261 |
| 187188636 (Comments: 1) | SIG_Ville_Anglet (Discussed changesets: 2) | merci @SIG_Ville_Anglet ;-) commented 2026-08-12 12:28:13 UTC by Mairie de Bayonne ♦7 |
| 170603816 (Comments: 1) | green_leek (Discussed changesets: 44) | The Wikipedia article linked to the place node is for a park, which is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2790873 So what is this place representing? commented 2026-08-12 12:26:28 UTC by GuardedBear ♦5 |
| 187334199 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | two issues here, first of all the name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this ca... commented 2026-08-12 12:26:10 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187312598 (Comments: 2) | El-Tinió (Discussed changesets: 1) | Außerdem: Der Hinweis note/5451180 ist ja wahrscheinlich von dir. Magst du nochmal genauer erklären, was dort geändert werden soll? Sind die Zugangsbeschränkungen (access=* etc.) dort nicht richtig? commented 2026-08-12 12:26:04 UTC by kadiwa ♦117 |
| 187334106 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | two issues here, first of all the name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this ca... commented 2026-08-12 12:25:14 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187267347 (Comments: 1) | M Hanif (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, we cannot add the names of living persons to OSM because that may violate their privacy. If you want to make a map of people and where they live, you might use umap.openstreetmap.de where you can configure the map to be private so that it is n... commented 2026-08-12 12:25:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187313822 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola. por favor no agregar nombres descriptivos. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187313822 commented 2026-08-12 12:24:45 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187314139 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | no se ve un parque ahí --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187314139 commented 2026-08-12 12:24:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187313657 (Comments: 3) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | Estimado. por favor no repetir los errores que ya le hemos corregido. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187313657 commented 2026-08-12 12:24:06 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187333774 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | The name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this case if there is a name it would... commented 2026-08-12 12:23:55 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187330022 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | The name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this case if there is a name it would... commented 2026-08-12 12:22:34 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 186283863 (Comments: 4) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi kitto33, thank you for making the corrections and for your feedback . While updating the geometry, I seem to have misinterpreted the situation. I will be more careful in analyzing available resources in my future edits. commented 2026-08-12 12:22:21 UTC by Gorger ♦57 |
| 187330144 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | The name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this case if there is a name it would... commented 2026-08-12 12:22:04 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187333374 (Comments: 1) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | two issues here, first of all the name added here seems unlikely to be correct as it is more of a description and thus isn't correct, names are not supposed to be a description of the object, they are intended for an actual name used, in this ca... commented 2026-08-12 12:21:18 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 179467531 (Comments: 2) | savsk (Discussed changesets: 20) | Z chęcią poprawię, jednak wypadało mi to powiedzieć 5 miesięcy temu, a nie teraz :) commented 2026-08-12 12:19:54 UTC by savsk ♦17 |
| 187171761 (Comments: 6) | mangeur 🇨🇭 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Update: organicmaps has problems handling "PH" in opening_hours strings, see https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/1575 as it was pointed out in https://c.osm.org/t//146392/6 commented 2026-08-12 12:14:47 UTC by 9_tab ♦111 |
| 187222270 (Comments: 1) | marta-kaczalek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187336421 commented 2026-08-12 12:12:56 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 186834636 (Comments: 1) | anafuenvicen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please connect nodes of highways in residential areas to each other to get a road network. Best regards commented 2026-08-12 12:06:34 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187335790 (Comments: 1) | ottwiz (Discussed changesets: 292) | I also aligned some of the routes because they were really off. commented 2026-08-12 12:00:00 UTC by ottwiz ♦399 |
| 187217164 (Comments: 1) | Marosmenti TISZA-Sziget (Discussed changesets: 2) | Üdv. A fáknak van saját jelölésük: - natural=tree ha egy fáról van szó - natural=tree_row - vonalként, ha fasorról van szó - natural=tree_group - facsoport, ha... commented 2026-08-12 11:59:10 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 185718134 (Comments: 3) | LTA510 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Erstmal danke, dass du dir die Nachrichten zu Herzen nimmst. Wegesegmentieren ist natürlich erlaubt, aber in manchen Fällen widerspricht es einfach dem "Keep it simple"-Prinzip. Der Nachteil ist dann ein erschwertes Bearbei... commented 2026-08-12 11:51:11 UTC by kadiwa ♦117 |
| 187330190 (Comments: 1) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Разгада мистерията --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187330190 commented 2026-08-12 11:39:44 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 187019098 (Comments: 1) | FlickAir (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia. Ez nem ugyanaz, mint a felette lévő Novicento autókereskedés? n277837337 commented 2026-08-12 11:37:26 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 187315289 (Comments: 1) | Jason Bedford (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, you've actually upgraded the road, which seems to be the opposite of what you were intending. If it's a private driveway, you'll need to search for "Driveway" in the editor, not "residential road" commented 2026-08-12 11:34:44 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦500 |
| 186922700 (Comments: 2) | melody_Tej (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hi Frans S, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-08-12 11:33:19 UTC by melody_Tej ♦31 |
| 185572297 (Comments: 2) | husni-RC (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi mueschel, Thanks for the note. I already fix the "sumber" tag before, changed it to source=*. For the is_in:* tags, I understand it's technically redundant since the district/regency boundaries already exist properly i... commented 2026-08-12 11:31:31 UTC by husni-RC ♦4 |
| 186246907 (Comments: 1) | Map_Moderator (Discussed changesets: 6) | מה הסיבה למחיקת הנקודה? זה מעיין נובע ושם רשמי. בבקשה לא לערוך סתם. commented 2026-08-12 11:17:26 UTC by hatul ♦504 |
| 187318480 (Comments: 2) | Taurus3 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Gefixt commented 2026-08-12 11:14:58 UTC by Taurus3 ♦21 |
| 187332881 (Comments: 1) | dreua (Discussed changesets: 8) | Shall we apply this nation/continent/world-wide? commented 2026-08-12 11:07:13 UTC by dreua ♦138 |
| 57786170 (Comments: 3) | wegerje (Discussed changesets: 16) | I understand, thanks. commented 2026-08-12 11:04:40 UTC by jfd553 ♦66 |
| 187301628 (Comments: 1) | Fokon (Discussed changesets: 1) | They both appear to have been diverted since I was last there. https://snipboard.io/AEcCdD.jpg Please update when you next visits. commented 2026-08-12 10:57:10 UTC by DaveF ♦1,679 |
| 187326340 (Comments: 1) | Matt Eryri (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've sent feedback on WhatsApp. I've split the buildings and aligned them to cadastral parcels. If you want to add `addr:*` information feel free. The gates and fences might be slightly misaligned from when I moved and split the houses. Dio... commented 2026-08-12 10:53:50 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦7 |
| 186644782 (Comments: 1) | bluestarfish (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. When you adjust a road (like tagging it as unpaved, check then also the connections to other roads. Here, in this settlement, not a single road connects to the main road. Best regards commented 2026-08-12 10:51:32 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187326948 (Comments: 4) | danieldebari (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ahh.. zo.. We mappen wat we zien en als er naambordje staan dan zou je in dit geval een vlak kunnen tekenen over dat kruispunt met place=square name=IJzerplein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsquare Tja .. en hoe zijn... commented 2026-08-12 10:51:04 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187290829 (Comments: 2) | Byenin (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi Udarian, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-08-12 10:38:25 UTC by Byenin ♦44 |
| 187291246 (Comments: 2) | Fil_Vim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Udarian, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-08-12 10:37:08 UTC by Fil_Vim ♦3 |
| 178061318 (Comments: 3) | 3Loader3 (Discussed changesets: 7) | I was thinking that was what happened, but wasn't sure. :) I've been using TagInfo: https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:ireland-and-northern-ireland/keys/addr:postcode#values to work through the most common tags, looking to those tha... commented 2026-08-12 10:28:04 UTC by VictorIE ♦1,227 |
| 187196579 (Comments: 3) | blinmaster (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hoi Fabian, Dankjewel voor je reactie :) Het makkelijkst voor zoiets kleins is denk ik gewoon een punt terugplaatsen op de plek van het oude punt en hier de tags op zetten die eerder op de adresnode stonden (alle addr: en source tags): ... commented 2026-08-12 10:22:25 UTC by Bovi887 ♦17 |
| 186884139 (Comments: 1) | anafuenvicen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please tag traces into farmland and wider than a few meters a a track. Not as a pat Best regards Hola. Gracias por tu contribución al mapa. Por favor, etiqueta los trazos que discurran por terreno... commented 2026-08-12 10:12:59 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 185647477 (Comments: 6) | Gitasaleh Virast (Discussed changesets: 7) | ولی الان اپلیکیشن ، دیشب قطع بود و امروز الان به زمانی برگشته که user/Khashayarmhm رابطه اتوبوسرانی میساخت. commented 2026-08-12 10:06:44 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦37 |
| 182359635 (Comments: 8) | samon53 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Thank you for taking and uploading the pictures. That appears to be box GL53 148. That box is a Type B box that has been converted to accept parcels. The pictures are useful to confirm that it is correctly tagged (post_box:design=digital_type_b). Unf... commented 2026-08-12 09:57:24 UTC by eastender ♦38 |
| 187328804 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 307) | Is version (75) commented 2026-08-12 09:56:51 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,082 |
| 187328836 (Comments: 1) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 50) | apologies for wrong edit while learning to use JOSM...wrong edits been reverted successfully commented 2026-08-12 09:56:19 UTC by BholeKiBhasam ♦36 |
| 187247675 (Comments: 1) | Carman2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187328826 commented 2026-08-12 09:56:15 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 187320293 (Comments: 9) | sebastic (Discussed changesets: 84) | Stop met tijd verspillen, arguing on the Internet is like winning the special olympics. Jouw vraag is al beantwoord in mijn eerdere comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187320293#c1642982 commented 2026-08-12 09:53:01 UTC by sebastic ♦107 |
| 187326583 (Comments: 1) | NeurodiverCeline (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Celine, 'k Denk dat de functie buurtcentrum of -huis is. Aangepast. De format van de openingstijden aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-12 09:49:56 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 180358769 (Comments: 1) | Francoerbi41 (Discussed changesets: 107) | Ciao Franco, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80367646/ qua sono davvero tre corsie o è un errore? Dalle immagini satellitari io ne vedo solo due. grazie e buon mapping! commented 2026-08-12 09:49:26 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,921 |
| 187326222 (Comments: 1) | NeurodiverCeline (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag NeurodiverCeline, Het bedrijf heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-12 09:45:39 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187074137 (Comments: 1) | Robert Lazu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Bad edit, reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187225982 commented 2026-08-12 09:31:25 UTC by AdrianLangtry ♦19 |
| 187044003 (Comments: 1) | Robert Lazu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Bad edit, reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187226032 commented 2026-08-12 09:30:36 UTC by AdrianLangtry ♦19 |
| 178515315 (Comments: 3) | CartoKees (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hoi CartoKees, Dank voor je reactie en uiteraard geen probleem! Ik had zelf nog even gekeken maar door de bomen zijn de daadwerkelijke locaties van de stacaravans lastig te spotten, dus dat durfde ik nog niet zo goed in te tekenen ha. Gebruik ... commented 2026-08-12 09:26:00 UTC by Probelnijs ♦15 |
| 187224204 (Comments: 5) | ALJuhlin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixar detta. Behöver dock kontrollera vissa stugnummer. commented 2026-08-12 09:21:53 UTC by ALJuhlin ♦1 |
| 187292139 (Comments: 2) | ivanruiz (Discussed changesets: 13) | Buenas, Ambos barrios se superponían y corregí Cal Bolavà cuando debería haberlo hecho con Calafell Poble, ya que no estaban bien definidos. Ahora lo arreglo basandome en la documentación del plan de barrios: htt... commented 2026-08-12 09:11:38 UTC by ivanruiz ♦13 |
| 184685328 (Comments: 1) | snsgn (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bitte bei der Benutzung von StreetComplete etwas vorsichtiger sein. Du hast mehrere Materialien gelöscht, die hier eingeworfen werden könne (z. B. recycling:cans, recycling:beverage_cartons) commented 2026-08-12 09:11:23 UTC by Bruno413 ♦13 |
| 187315188 (Comments: 8) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 270) | P.S. Railways, especially passenger services that "sit on top of" (logically / semantically speaking) rail infrastructure (sometimes shared with freight rail, sometimes not) is a fairly "advanced" topic in OSM. It literally took... commented 2026-08-12 09:11:01 UTC by stevea ♦325 |
| 187314808 (Comments: 1) | Forest998 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Nadal przesuwasz osie jezdni które mają podaną wartość placement=* Dlaczego to robisz i dlaczego nie odpisujesz na komentarze w zestawach zmian? commented 2026-08-12 09:07:51 UTC by dzamper ♦271 |
| 187315036 (Comments: 5) | Peter W34 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks Joel, I will have a look at those examples. The wiki uses floors for the levels. I've only found a couple of buildings like that. Tend to just add the main street address to a multi story building. The two in Beenleigh are offices. There ... commented 2026-08-12 09:07:38 UTC by Peter W34 ♦14 |
| 187248686 (Comments: 1) | Macbiz01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187325949 commented 2026-08-12 08:53:38 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 151251886 (Comments: 9) | bikepiper (Discussed changesets: 10) | ach nein, diese Router dürften einfach die living_street meiden, was aber deren Problem ist. An der Donaustraße (Bahnunterfŭng) sind die selben conditionals und dort wird geroutet. commented 2026-08-12 08:53:33 UTC by bikepiper ♦24 |
| 186177566 (Comments: 2) | nilogian (Discussed changesets: 13) | Salve, osservazione corretta, ho già contattato una persona del gruppo A Ovest del Monte Cimone, ne discuteranno nel gruppo, ma penso che si limiteranno, nel futuro, a mettere solo nuovi WS. Saluti commented 2026-08-12 08:48:53 UTC by nilogian ♦2 |
| 67555285 (Comments: 5) | Bergliste_at (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke dir! Ich werd noch beim dort für die Wanderwege zuständigen Alpenverein nachfragen was der zu beiden Gipfeln sagt. commented 2026-08-12 08:40:45 UTC by PPete2 ♦173 |
| 186776648 (Comments: 3) | Gitasaleh Virast (Discussed changesets: 7) | تشکر میکنم commented 2026-08-12 08:34:09 UTC by Claudius Henrichs ♦227 |
| 187316696 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, please use changeset comments to describe what you changed and why. A comment such as this is not an appropriate changeset description and makes reviewing your edits unnecessarily difficult. Please use descriptive changeset comm... commented 2026-08-12 08:15:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187321708 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, please use changeset comments to describe what you changed and why. A comment such as this is not an appropriate changeset description and makes reviewing your edits unnecessarily difficult. Please use descriptive changeset comm... commented 2026-08-12 08:15:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187320901 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, please use changeset comments to describe what you changed and why. A comment such as this is not an appropriate changeset description and makes reviewing your edits unnecessarily difficult. Please use descriptive changeset comm... commented 2026-08-12 08:15:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187320478 (Comments: 1) | Kyler Chin (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, please use changeset comments to describe what you changed and why. A comment such as this is not an appropriate changeset description and makes reviewing your edits unnecessarily difficult. Please use descriptive changeset comm... commented 2026-08-12 08:15:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187182268 (Comments: 1) | ScarlettB (Discussed changesets: 18) | The wrong changeset comment seems to have made its way into this CS. It should read something like "Updated intersections". commented 2026-08-12 08:14:13 UTC by ScarlettB ♦17 |
| 187322358 (Comments: 1) | Weedz DC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187324142 Comment: "Remove vandalism" commented 2026-08-12 08:12:57 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,969 |
| 187275847 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 17) | Merci pour ton retour Syl, je corrige cela tout de suite et relance une publication globale sur le réseau Korian. Merci pour ta vigilance. commented 2026-08-12 08:06:29 UTC by Digitaleo ♦22 |
| 187281387 (Comments: 4) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Бях забравил на начертая оградата - way/1549026399. Спомням си, че беше абсурдно малко пространство, даже не знам дали имаше и гаражи. Но като г... commented 2026-08-12 08:03:01 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦59 |
| 173037846 (Comments: 1) | Pipiruda (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your response on my other query. Same question here: a water point is for camper vehicles (usually) to pick up fresh water. Is that what you meant? As it's behind the locked gate, I imagine you meant something else? Als... commented 2026-08-12 07:54:18 UTC by eteb3 ♦160 |
| 173306882 (Comments: 3) | Pipiruda (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, I have modified the tags so it's not a leisure use. commented 2026-08-12 07:50:19 UTC by eteb3 ♦160 |
| 185127181 (Comments: 3) | vasony-qa (Discussed changesets: 13) | Köszi! commented 2026-08-12 07:40:25 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 185614752 (Comments: 9) | tindew (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dank je wel, eggie, ik ga ermee aan de slag! Hartelijk groet, tindew commented 2026-08-12 07:30:06 UTC by tindew ♦2 |
| 187165150 (Comments: 3) | Oliver Farník (Discussed changesets: 15) | Castecne revertnuto v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187321603 , obnoveno spojeni mimo dalnicni sit (podle predchoziho nebylo mozne dostat se z Wull. do DD jinak nez "najedu na dalnici a okamzite sjedu," coz neni mistni pripad, ne ... commented 2026-08-12 07:17:07 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
| 187321228 (Comments: 2) | habi (Discussed changesets: 462) | Und die Notiz, die erledigt wurde ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5450898, nicht die im Kommentar erwähnte. Ich muss dringend mal wieder JOSM neu starten :) commented 2026-08-12 07:06:33 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 186944452 (Comments: 1) | coolingspots (Discussed changesets: 3) | Die Hot Tubs wurden hier daneben schon erfasst, siehe z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237287251 Auf den swisstopo Luftbildern sind noch mehr Hot Tubs zu erkennen, als erfasst. Evtl. lohnt es sich, das Alpenbad als Polygon drumrum zu erf... commented 2026-08-12 06:59:10 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 186756488 (Comments: 3) | coolingspots (Discussed changesets: 3) | PS2: Irgendwelche weitere Frage und Diskussionen zu OpenStreetMap werden im Schweizer Teil des Forums bei https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ch/107 beantwortet und geführt :) commented 2026-08-12 06:55:52 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 187251442 (Comments: 1) | iamjuliafilf (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187320756 commented 2026-08-12 06:53:32 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 187305836 (Comments: 1) | coolingspots (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ciao Coolingspots-Mensch Die 'sibe Brünne' sind schon bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1873034174 als Quelle erfasst. Evtl. macht es Sinn, den Wasserfall auf dem gleichen Knoten dazu zu erfassen, nicht? Gruss au... commented 2026-08-12 06:51:37 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 187272701 (Comments: 2) | sudo81 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Es gibt (noch?) keinen offiziellen Strassennamen, weshalb ich die Form der Beschrebung wählte. Falls das falsch ist, was wäre das korrekte Vorgehen? Betreffend der Geschwindigkeit: Praktisch nicht umsetzbar, rechtlich gesehen aber ja, da... commented 2026-08-12 06:47:16 UTC by sudo81 ♦1 |
| 187102239 (Comments: 5) | lxndrl (Discussed changesets: 3) | erledigt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187320601 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187320499 commented 2026-08-12 06:46:03 UTC by lxndrl ♦1 |
| 187229551 (Comments: 1) | Felipe Flausino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187320522 commented 2026-08-12 06:42:21 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187164073 (Comments: 3) | Andre68 (Discussed changesets: 76) | Kein Problem. Ich habe den Netto Parkplatz auf "Ebenerdiger Parkplatz" geändert. Rest passt ja. commented 2026-08-12 06:33:36 UTC by turbopixel ♦12 |
| 184179428 (Comments: 1) | Lucia Zajacová (Discussed changesets: 4) | Naozaj tam ten kruháč nie je? commented 2026-08-12 06:26:38 UTC by Dodko ♦1,365 |
| 187319758 (Comments: 1) | kianjay (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! When adding stores to the map please only put the actual name of a store in the name field. For personal notes you can use bookmarks as they're not relevant for other map users. Also please try to u... commented 2026-08-12 06:25:45 UTC by Timmy_Tesseract ♦190 |
| 187290389 (Comments: 2) | damianeue (Discussed changesets: 152) | Grazie totera, non lo sapevo, cercherò di sistemare dove ho sbagliato commented 2026-08-12 06:24:50 UTC by damianeue ♦121 |
| 187033130 (Comments: 1) | Lucia Zajacová (Discussed changesets: 4) | Netreba si vymýšľať adresu, ale treba požiadať mesto o pridelenie adresy a zapísanie do registra adries. commented 2026-08-12 06:19:08 UTC by Dodko ♦1,365 |
| 187054887 (Comments: 1) | Enegiabörze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Javítottam az energiatároló címkézését. Mivel területnek kellene lennie, pontosan hol van? A jelenlegi helyétől keletre, az a sötét csík? Vagy a nape... commented 2026-08-12 06:16:08 UTC by itineris ♦430 |
| 187274272 (Comments: 2) | db-ak (Discussed changesets: 55) | Jak robią na podstawie jakis tajemniczych śladów gps to tak wychodzi, potem rozwalają cały routing choć w terenie zawsze było dwukierunkowo commented 2026-08-12 06:13:40 UTC by db-ak ♦82 |
| 187035406 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 13) | Could you add an explaination for your change at Taco Bell? commented 2026-08-12 05:50:01 UTC by kitto33 ♦16 |
| 187229573 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187318686 commented 2026-08-12 05:42:30 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 179353309 (Comments: 1) | VLD522 (Discussed changesets: 12) | This was a very small segment that you edited here, meaning the name change won't show up. Where's the first sign blade for Grand Avenue? commented 2026-08-12 05:23:40 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦326 |
| 179418414 (Comments: 1) | VLD522 (Discussed changesets: 12) | You renamed the two bridges of US 60 but didn't rename any other segment of the highway, effectively creating a gap in the named road route "Grand Avenue". Can you please explain yourself? Thanks! commented 2026-08-12 05:17:57 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦326 |
| 187222598 (Comments: 2) | votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (Discussed changesets: 514) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre alerte. Après analyse il s'agit effectivement d'une erreur de diffusion Cordialement, L'Equipe DB commented 2026-08-12 05:13:11 UTC by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale ♦333 |
| 186453975 (Comments: 2) | MK2705 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Servus, bin vorhin erst daran vorbei gefahren, ich kann dir bestätigen, dass das Gebäude noch genau so steht, wie vor einem halben Jahr ;) So wie es von der Straße aus aussieht, ist da auch ein Optiker drin. Ich vermute, dass... commented 2026-08-12 05:00:10 UTC by MK2705 ♦11 |
| 187256003 (Comments: 1) | Aviva73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187317298 commented 2026-08-12 04:42:49 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 187274192 (Comments: 1) | ArjanO (Discussed changesets: 20) | Why do you think this Way should be removed? The right-of-way is still there, tag motorcar=no correctly applied, motorcycles are still allowed permissively commented 2026-08-12 04:15:24 UTC by NaufalFarras ♦45 |
| 187247073 (Comments: 1) | macary (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-12 03:51:56 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 187305818 (Comments: 1) | EZRouting (Discussed changesets: 90) | Why was the stop sign deleted by this edit? I added it 8 days ago because it exists. commented 2026-08-12 03:48:50 UTC by Closeapple ♦2 |
| 187316264 (Comments: 1) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 15) | 以及清理转向关系 commented 2026-08-12 03:44:28 UTC by hahae ♦48 |
| 184146414 (Comments: 2) | wizerbar (Discussed changesets: 14) | coz now it is an agricultural field commented 2026-08-12 03:43:39 UTC by wizerbar ♦10 |
| 109474321 (Comments: 1) | yzal (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ahoj, tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8996516372) a inde si nespravne oznacil , ze ma priechod ostrovcek. Daj na to , prosim, pozor. Dik. commented 2026-08-12 03:36:27 UTC by Tomas_J ♦402 |
| 187118088 (Comments: 1) | Disc8964 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 可以稍微解释一下为何将中心公路Way1352287823南沙社区居委会-南沙公交站，这一段改成双向分离吗？感谢。因为这一段目前只是普通的双向两车道，而且未来没有施工的打算。 commented 2026-08-12 03:33:32 UTC by JimmyWOO ♦4 |
| 187308973 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 85) | Why did you remove the oneway=yes tag from this tertiary link? Aerial imagery clearly shows that this slip lane is one-way. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187308973 ... commented 2026-08-12 03:19:29 UTC by Frank Peng ♦223 |
| 187300134 (Comments: 1) | SPPG Cikarang 2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | apcb commented 2026-08-12 03:15:27 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 186902616 (Comments: 1) | DarrylRM (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Darry, thanks for editing the map! Just noticed you surveying house numbers and wanted to give you a heads up that there's an existing database of addresses called the National Address Database which includes Mapleton addresses, meaning they ... commented 2026-08-12 03:13:16 UTC by HashFerret ♦21 |
| 187094072 (Comments: 1) | Seaviator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Once again, I had no idea this wasn't on the map I've updated the tag from "Resturant" to "Noodle Resturant", aswell as cleaned up and fixed up the POI in changeset/187315722 commented 2026-08-12 03:08:52 UTC by O1S ♦27 |
| 185685179 (Comments: 2) | RouteSignal (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the response, I agree that the traffic island should be mapped, but because it’s such a small island, I don’t think the road needs to be split into two separate ways. The OSM Wiki recommends keeping the road a single way... commented 2026-08-12 03:04:49 UTC by RouteSignal ♦3 |
| 187090811 (Comments: 1) | Seaviator (Discussed changesets: 6) | Per their website, they claim to be a large Asian supermarket. So I've therefore, tagged it as shop=supermarket* and changed the name. (I actually have been there, but I didn't know it wasn't on the map!) I've cleaned up and fixed... commented 2026-08-12 03:02:48 UTC by O1S ♦27 |
| 187286828 (Comments: 1) | KlausGustav (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo KlausGustav, ich vermute mal hier geht es um den Auszug der Gustav Epple Baunternehmung GmbH. Die Adresse des Gebäudes wurde versehentlich gelöscht, oder? --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2026-08-12 02:57:39 UTC by HansSprungfeld ♦1 |
| 187307586 (Comments: 1) | MiniLinkPedia (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21091 commented 2026-08-12 02:56:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 187093916 (Comments: 1) | Seaviator (Discussed changesets: 6) | First, The restaurant already exists! See node/9554865060 Second, the name should be written as "Kung Fu Noodle House", not, "Kung fu noodle house" I've merged them both for you in changeset/187315163 commented 2026-08-12 02:39:57 UTC by O1S ♦27 |
| 187264041 (Comments: 2) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21090 commented 2026-08-12 02:24:13 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 187261293 (Comments: 2) | DieHhll (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tenes razon. Me fije en los edificios cercanos y copie el tag, pero todos aparecen como 'commercial' y se traduce como 'edificio de oficinas'. Los voy a ir cambiando por av de mayo. commented 2026-08-12 01:47:42 UTC by DieHhll ♦1 |
| 187264021 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314218 commented 2026-08-12 01:37:26 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187264028 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314198 commented 2026-08-12 01:36:13 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187264033 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314167 commented 2026-08-12 01:34:56 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187264036 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Revert Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314162 commented 2026-08-12 01:34:43 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187264038 (Comments: 1) | Chosen1of99 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Malicious Commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187314130 commented 2026-08-12 01:32:50 UTC by kristian8983271 ♦6 |
| 187203051 (Comments: 4) | coturnix (Discussed changesets: 1) | That's helpful. Based on my memory from the recent trip, I have removed some of the fords (and a few non-existent streams) here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187313897 commented 2026-08-12 01:21:46 UTC by coturnix ♦1 |
| 187313467 (Comments: 1) | xw61982 (Discussed changesets: 2) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-12 01:09:53 UTC by Udarian ♦867 |
| 186453415 (Comments: 3) | G McM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks Graham. Have done. Yeah good compromise location as the original one is pretty much now a running lane of the A3 on the other side of it. I ran past it tonight (Wednesday). Still there :) Have you spotted the other resited one - about a mile n... commented 2026-08-12 01:05:52 UTC by Tim Grose ♦13 |
| 187313357 (Comments: 1) | Visaman (Discussed changesets: 10) | please be more specific in your changeset comments, basically every non-vandalism edit is adding missing data commented 2026-08-12 00:50:47 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦30 |
| 187307500 (Comments: 2) | carto_unigis (Discussed changesets: 4) | Se me olvidaba preguntarte si podrías indicar la fuente de información para afirmar que este es el polígono Entre Ríos. Buscando por internet, se afirma que ese polígono industrial se encuentra en Onda. Sin embargo,... commented 2026-08-12 00:36:04 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,855 |
| 133063463 (Comments: 2) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hello! The GNIS database used to contain information about various structures as well as natural features. They've since decided to stop tracking structure info (hence the 404) but older data file dumps still have this info. now, ... commented 2026-08-12 00:28:05 UTC by watmildon ♦315 |
| 187310008 (Comments: 1) | EvanSiroky (Discussed changesets: 14) | W commented 2026-08-12 00:13:41 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦30 |
| 178598448 (Comments: 2) | Edawyt3425 (Discussed changesets: 25) | ... Pierwsze co mi przychodzi na myśl to chęć wycofania całej edycji. Nie mam na tyle czasu by bawić się w częściowe wycofanie bo gdy się temu przyglądam to nie bardzo jest jakaś część do pozostawienia bo i tak te obiekty wymagały by p... commented 2026-08-11 23:25:04 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦687 |
| 187279598 (Comments: 1) | swallowandspeech (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:54:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187279383 (Comments: 1) | swallowandspeech (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:54:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187266431 (Comments: 1) | swallowandspeech (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:54:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187282411 (Comments: 1) | 360impactfl (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:51:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
 | 187253630 (Comments: 2) | edgarpaniagua (Discussed changesets: 1) | That actually wasn't touched at all in this changeset and had nothing to do with this user; as you can see from the object history of node 2649277541 https://www.osm.org/node/2649277541/history ...that was added by @Genesisvaleria ... commented 2026-08-11 22:47:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
 | 187271281 (Comments: 1) | dingmingzhi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, use of Google Maps and other Google products as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Googl... commented 2026-08-11 22:32:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187310913 (Comments: 1) | martinst (Discussed changesets: 18) | imagery_used=https://mapsneu.wien.gv.at/basemap/bmapoberflaeche/grau/google3857/{z}/{y}/{x}.jpeg commented 2026-08-11 22:30:48 UTC by martinst ♦404 |
| 187275760 (Comments: 1) | Biuro Detektywistyczne Sigma (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-11 22:29:02 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 186760047 (Comments: 2) | adefrafafefdad (Discussed changesets: 3) | سلام ایشون درست نوشتن و منبع از مشاهدات میدانی هست commented 2026-08-11 22:28:16 UTC by adefrafafefdad ♦1 |
| 187298574 (Comments: 1) | Style Code Inc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standa... commented 2026-08-11 22:25:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 181622581 (Comments: 1) | Marcos Medeiros (Discussed changesets: 34) | Por favor conecte as vias a outras vias da malha para que possam ser roteáveis e navegáveis ;) commented 2026-08-11 22:14:48 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦89 |
| 75010893 (Comments: 1) | czupirek (Discussed changesets: 4) | Cześć, dzięki za edycje. Wydaje się, że dobrze znasz tę okolicę. Czy głaz pamiątkowy Ottonowi Gerickemu wciąż istnieje w tym samym miejscu? Byłem dziś na tym skrzyżowaniu ścieżek i nie dostrzegłem takiego obiektu - może został prze... commented 2026-08-11 22:11:59 UTC by czebureks ♦183 |
| 179972760 (Comments: 3) | Edawyt3425 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Wgłębiając się w historię tej drogi to autor tej edycji gdzieś tam poprzednio zmienił klasyfikację właśnie na track i na szczęście ktoś inny litościwie przywrócił przynajmniej service ale spapranej geometrii drogi nikt nie popr... commented 2026-08-11 22:11:25 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦687 |
| 187169895 (Comments: 2) | khoensch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für die Hinweise, habe es angepasst. commented 2026-08-11 21:55:00 UTC by khoensch ♦1 |
| 164995380 (Comments: 3) | marcosalexandre00912 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Haveria a possibilidade de tentar manter o que não consta ainda no mapa e fazer os devidos ajustes para aproveitar essas geometrias. Vou ver com calma amanhã e te darei um parecer sobre a viabilidade. commented 2026-08-11 21:54:06 UTC by santamariense ♦860 |
| 183980943 (Comments: 1) | Amanda Tavaress (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oi Amanda, na proxima tenha mais cuidado, você acabou apagando a tag highway=unclassifield que é o que determina o tipo de via, isso é uma tag muito importante tome mais cuidado e fique antenta aos alertas do editor Boa ... commented 2026-08-11 21:51:59 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦89 |
| 187309025 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | esto es para jugar a algún juego relacionado con los parques? saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187309025 commented 2026-08-11 21:46:17 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187308996 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | HOla. Building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo, además por favor dibujar la forma que se observa en la foto, y con capitalización normal. Fue corregido. --- Published us... commented 2026-08-11 21:45:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187309093 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | duplicado --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187309093 commented 2026-08-11 21:45:04 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187304598 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 167) | Dzięki commented 2026-08-11 21:41:57 UTC by zuicz ♦314 |
| 187306759 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola. por favor no agregar direcciones en los parques. no tienen. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187306759 commented 2026-08-11 21:30:13 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187308290 (Comments: 1) | Ancrou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. por favor escribir con capitalización normal. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187308290 commented 2026-08-11 21:26:40 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187308753 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola. Por favor no isar nombres descriptivos. U puede cuadrar la cancha con la letra Q. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187308753 commented 2026-08-11 21:25:28 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187308679 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola. Marcó los estanques como si usaran el predio completo. Por favor no mezclar esas cosas, será corregido. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187308679 ... commented 2026-08-11 21:24:51 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187308873 (Comments: 1) | asdfghjklsdfghjkldfghj (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hola. por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. Si no tiene nombre o si no lo sabe, no inventarlo. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187308873 commented 2026-08-11 21:24:00 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 147343327 (Comments: 3) | ErikMi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für die schnelle Anpassung. Viele Grüße commented 2026-08-11 21:14:25 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 102003033 (Comments: 2) | chriii (Discussed changesets: 2) | Für "Keine Antwort" ein wenig früh, aber eh, ich lösch das, dort ist kein Sportzentrum und Bouldern kann man an vielen Orten. commented 2026-08-11 21:11:07 UTC by Hungerburg ♦423 |
| 187209376 (Comments: 2) | Nagy Zolt (Discussed changesets: 1) | A shop=kitchen inkább konyhai bútorokat, kivitelezést, konyha berendezést jelöl. Ebben az esetben a shop=fireplace pontosabb jelölés, a wiki szerint beletartozik a kemence is. commented 2026-08-11 21:05:03 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 187242043 (Comments: 3) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 4) | The default assumption in OSM is public access, so the legal easement detail doesn't actually need different tagging from what a normal public indoor corridor would get. A ground-floor hallway isn't typically signed as "Saint Paul Skyw... commented 2026-08-11 21:03:46 UTC by ion_chi ♦86 |
| 179409052 (Comments: 3) | jmapb (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello J, Thanks for getting back to me! I appreciate you looking into these and sharing your thoughts on the tagging. I agree that crossing=uncontrolled is somewhat of an unintuitive tag, though I find it easier to wrap my head around if I con... commented 2026-08-11 20:59:28 UTC by VLD280 ♦15 |
| 187239905 (Comments: 3) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 4) | 1. right, so what is the meaning of layer=0;1? If it's not crossing another way, it probably doesn't need layer at all. layer=1 isn't intended to mean what level something is on, that's what the level tag is for commented 2026-08-11 20:58:37 UTC by ion_chi ♦86 |
| 186672900 (Comments: 2) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 54) | Thanks for raising this. Firstly, just to clarify the point about automation: these edits were not generated or uploaded through an automated or agentic process. I researched the businesses individually and added/reviewed the entries manually in iD.<... commented 2026-08-11 20:53:13 UTC by mrpacmanmap ♦9 |
| 187210163 (Comments: 4) | Enderbyte99 (Discussed changesets: 15) | I was wondering how on earth you got all of those names for regions along the river I had never heard of before. That map must be quite old. The oldest one I remember is the very colourful one from the early 2010s. That map also does confirm my suspi... commented 2026-08-11 20:46:24 UTC by Enderbyte99 ♦15 |
| 161991185 (Comments: 3) | agrifolia (Discussed changesets: 6) | I might recommend asking in the community forum for tagging opinions. If they are navigable, something under highway= would be appropriate. highway=track and highway=service are sometimes used for land access roads. amenity=bench is certainly not rig... commented 2026-08-11 20:39:51 UTC by impiaaa ♦489 |
 | 187257595 (Comments: 4) | Madéquis (Discussed changesets: 5) | One extra note: Partially for my reasons of using new translations is because the Esperanto community is full of people from far and wide, and I think the Anglocentric reusing of English location names would be harmful for Esperanto speakers who did ... commented 2026-08-11 20:35:53 UTC by Madéquis ♦1 |
| 49469868 (Comments: 3) | krja (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sorry, I can not help here. I was there 9 years ago and mapped what I saw. If you understand Croatian, here is Duga Luka's wikipedia article which mentions Prtlog: https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duga_Luka commented 2026-08-11 20:35:47 UTC by krja ♦5 |
| 186545749 (Comments: 6) | xx yyy19 (Discussed changesets: 5) | The guidelines are unmistakably clear: OpenStreetMap is not intended for mapping historical features. If something can be still seen, the lifecycle prefixes are the proper way to tag. If there are no traces of a feature, they do not be... commented 2026-08-11 20:29:32 UTC by SafwatHalaby ♦773 |
| 183697566 (Comments: 3) | kissslorinc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Köszi az infót! Megszűnő üzleteket az esetek nagy részében nem szoktunk törölni, mert későbbi szerkesztésnél segíthet a POI előélete. Feltételezhető, hogy itt maj... commented 2026-08-11 20:25:21 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 187306870 (Comments: 1) | kiritimati_c7g (Discussed changesets: 10) | *stop signs not speed limits commented 2026-08-11 20:24:55 UTC by kiritimati_c7g ♦12 |
| 187304824 (Comments: 1) | Rafael RPM (Discussed changesets: 3) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187306748 commented 2026-08-11 20:21:54 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 186018098 (Comments: 2) | aronpfabian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Subway platforms and generally underpasses in Budapest don't have public water taps. If there is any, that is in the closed service areas and only available for transport company or sanitation personnel. In the particular case, there is a... commented 2026-08-11 20:13:00 UTC by aronpfabian ♦1 |
| 187305089 (Comments: 4) | Johnboekelo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik snap het, bedankt commented 2026-08-11 20:10:48 UTC by Johnboekelo ♦2 |
| 187302704 (Comments: 4) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Ооо, ама чак преди малко май обърнах внимание, че това е Столипиново... btw споделянето на такива видеа не е за всеки.... Аз просто сподели... commented 2026-08-11 20:09:56 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 187292266 (Comments: 1) | PrzystańKowale (Discussed changesets: 1) | poprawiam po tobie błędy. sprawdz w jaki sposób i nie rób ich więcej Dobrze, że jest source, bo inaczje już bym wycofał wszystkie zmiany https://przystankowale.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/img_20200806_200841.jpg commented 2026-08-11 20:08:59 UTC by Yog Sot ♦536 |
| 186893875 (Comments: 10) | NathanRib (Discussed changesets: 3) | The list of sanctioned trails on Mt fromme can be found here. https://docs.dnv.org/documents/fromme-mountain-sustainable-trail-plan.pdf I’ll forward this discussion to the DNV. Yes different rating systems use different ... commented 2026-08-11 20:08:02 UTC by NathanRib ♦1 |
| 187021316 (Comments: 1) | JerzyUrban (Discussed changesets: 18) | Prośba o podawanie źródeł takich informacji, których nie widać na mapie. Na razie jest rozbiórka obiektów, Roma Tower nadal czeka ofijalnie na swoją kolej. commented 2026-08-11 19:59:53 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦427 |
| 187252714 (Comments: 1) | TeamCordonbleu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Das `highway=unclassified` an der Düngerstrasse impliziert, dass das Ding von Velos und Auto befahren werden und von Fuss... commented 2026-08-11 19:48:53 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 187227603 (Comments: 1) | Parek23 (Discussed changesets: 1) | "Aktualizacja woj. Małopolskie" To jest opis edycji ? Co to komukolwiek ma powiedzieć ? "Opisy" wcześniejszych zmian https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Parek23/history?before=181755583#map=4/34.38/-19.62&layers=N <... commented 2026-08-11 19:45:52 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦687 |
| 187277181 (Comments: 1) | Marcel Mader (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Marcel Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Hier beim Clubhaus hat's schon jetzt 3 Defibrillatoren (deinen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14... commented 2026-08-11 19:45:28 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 187285445 (Comments: 5) | Johnboekelo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt voor het coachen, heb de edit inmiddels opnieuw doorgevoerd. commented 2026-08-11 19:41:54 UTC by Johnboekelo ♦2 |
| 187250610 (Comments: 2) | gargantuapantagruel (Discussed changesets: 8) | Nie ma tam żadnego zakazu/bramy...Zmiana nieprawidłowa. commented 2026-08-11 19:36:26 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 187221246 (Comments: 4) | Gitasaleh Virast (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thank you commented 2026-08-11 19:33:01 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,226 |
| 187268729 (Comments: 4) | Demowa (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bahnradsportlern sind etwas verrückt. Erklärt einiges an der Stelle ;) Der Punkt ist, nicht nur Wiki-Einträge sagen was erlaubt / nicht erlaubt oder möglich / nicht möglich ist. Da Fehlen viele rechtliche Hinweisen ... commented 2026-08-11 19:20:08 UTC by Demowa ♦6 |
| 161291983 (Comments: 1) | DoloresReis (Discussed changesets: 28) | Oi boa tarde, estou encontrando muitas vias desconectadas, porfavor entre em contato commented 2026-08-11 19:14:35 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦89 |
| 186964115 (Comments: 4) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 54) | Thanks - that's a fair point, and I should clarify what I meant in my previous comment, as I phrased the sourcing process somewhat loosely. I haven't been copying business names, addresses or other POI information from Google Maps di... commented 2026-08-11 19:13:03 UTC by mrpacmanmap ♦9 |
| 187238180 (Comments: 10) | MiniLinkPedia (Discussed changesets: 7) | Som za revert. commented 2026-08-11 19:02:51 UTC by *Martin* ♦663 |
| 187297084 (Comments: 1) | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 (Discussed changesets: 192) | comment应为方南町数据细化 commented 2026-08-11 18:57:00 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦596 |
| 187294722 (Comments: 2) | samina1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://earth.google.com/web/search/36%2e10675080428568,+-115%2e17386402749933/@36.10668276,-115.17364519,646.51995359a,151.35198364d,35y,52.30200315h,0t,0r/data=Cm4aQBI6GTJpnQKqDUJAIel8eJYgy1zAKiYzNi4xMDY3NTA4MDQyODU2OCwgLTExNS4xNzM4NjQwMjc0OTkzMxgC... commented 2026-08-11 18:40:16 UTC by samina1 ♦1 |
| 187093553 (Comments: 1) | Namensänderung Begengungszentrum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen. Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/349336416 ist es "wichtig", die Öffnungszeiten und Gottesdienst-Zeiten g... commented 2026-08-11 18:18:16 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 187298408 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 262) | Thanks for fixing my error! 😊 commented 2026-08-11 18:02:00 UTC by IpswichEdits ♦40 |
| 187287994 (Comments: 1) | Thomas der Erste (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Thomas der Erste, aus welchem Grund hast Du hier "oneway:bicycle=no", also das Radfahrer hier in beide Richtungen in der Einbahnstraße fahren dürfen, entfernt ? Gruß Zrop commented 2026-08-11 18:01:31 UTC by Zrop ♦146 |
| 185838645 (Comments: 3) | Moritz Münch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi zusammen, ich glaube die Grünanlagensatzung bezieht sich auf die Grünanlage "Am Kapuzinerhölzl" zwischen Daueranlage NW63 NW17 und der Straße "Am Kapuzinerhölzl". Wo genau weiß ich nicht aber ans... commented 2026-08-11 17:53:51 UTC by qkaz ♦25 |
| 187024486 (Comments: 2) | RasmusKLo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Det havde jeg ikke lige set. Det må jeg huske fremadrettet :) commented 2026-08-11 17:48:18 UTC by RasmusKLo ♦2 |
| 187030246 (Comments: 2) | RasmusKLo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Nej, er ikke nået nord for Rådmands Boulevard endnu. commented 2026-08-11 17:46:50 UTC by RasmusKLo ♦2 |
| 185804252 (Comments: 1) | GiasinIt (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao, "sst" is a term not yet in use in other places. In Germany there are a few 'rail_replacement_service=yes' used on dedicated bus stops. This seems a bit more generic than the Italian abbreviation. I suggest bu... commented 2026-08-11 17:31:05 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 187256679 (Comments: 4) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 94) | Dzięki za odpowiedź. Z chęcią dołączę do dyskusji bo widzę zawiłość tego tematu commented 2026-08-11 17:30:25 UTC by Arbuzik55 ♦7 |
| 187282779 (Comments: 1) | ExeJamesB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi ExeJamesB, Unfortunately the National Street Gazetteer is copyrighted and not available for use in OpenStreetMap. Examples of sources we can use are Ordnance Survey Open Data and personal surveys. The Gazetteer provides the definitiv... commented 2026-08-11 17:30:17 UTC by JassKurn ♦184 |
 | 187286350 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1000) | the hell is this changeset dawg commented 2026-08-11 17:19:10 UTC by dmjab13 ♦131 |
| 186698578 (Comments: 2) | SteveTheWelsh (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK I've done that - cheers commented 2026-08-11 17:10:59 UTC by SteveTheWelsh ♦1 |
| 187260963 (Comments: 3) | TECHDEV GPS (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hola El motivo de este mensaje no es cuestionar la veracidad de la información, sino la calidad técnica de la ejecución. Que es bastante baja. Actualmente, me encuentro revisando las ediciones junto a otro colab... commented 2026-08-11 17:00:33 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 184129617 (Comments: 4) | anngrz08 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ok, dziękuję. commented 2026-08-11 16:58:43 UTC by Fan map 2 ♦25 |
| 185670960 (Comments: 2) | TriglavMountain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Enock4seth, Thanks for reaching out! While my original edit had been to just disconnect [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629413496] from the way I created to the south, after further review of the Vantor imagery I agree that it does not a... commented 2026-08-11 16:54:02 UTC by TriglavMountain ♦1 |
| 186671157 (Comments: 4) | ssundell (Discussed changesets: 7) | Selvä. Ehkäpä käyn maastossa tarkastamassa kun kuljen sielläpäin. commented 2026-08-11 16:52:39 UTC by suniala ♦4 |
| 185660554 (Comments: 1) | igorekpotworek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Częściowo wycofane: https://osm.org/changeset/187296207 commented 2026-08-11 16:52:12 UTC by Fan map 2 ♦25 |
| 186590469 (Comments: 2) | Numbert987 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Keine Reaktion, korrigiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187296929. commented 2026-08-11 16:44:57 UTC by aixbrick ♦929 |
| 187245677 (Comments: 4) | Flynn Marquardt (Discussed changesets: 22) | I partial reverted this changeset as requested. commented 2026-08-11 16:42:04 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦74 |
| 186046833 (Comments: 3) | empers (Discussed changesets: 43) | karavanai.eu commented 2026-08-11 16:36:43 UTC by ygcgjp5 ♦116 |
 | 187260410 (Comments: 5) | AndreePham (Discussed changesets: 1) | nếu bạn muốn đặt tên riêng thì hãy luôn đặt tên theo bảng tên đường thực tế commented 2026-08-11 16:34:41 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦52 |
| 186464123 (Comments: 3) | blumdrew (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was tagging using bing aerials. Might have just been a mistake on my part... sorry about that! commented 2026-08-11 16:32:27 UTC by blumdrew ♦1 |
| 186335262 (Comments: 1) | Jim Hillebrand (Discussed changesets: 7) | Check svp op welke grond je een bankje hebt toegevoegd. Er staat hier al wat. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-11 16:32:10 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 186518149 (Comments: 1) | Jim Hillebrand (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bankje verwijderd. Er staat al zoiets. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-11 16:31:11 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 186695537 (Comments: 3) | Jim Hillebrand (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag Jim, Ik heb de indruk dat je met mapsme gewoon bankjes toevoegt zonder te checken of er al bankjes op de kaart aanwezig zijn. Ik heb je bankjes verwijderd. Ze zijn er niet. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-11 16:29:54 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 185103190 (Comments: 1) | G_Robert (Discussed changesets: 3) | Gibt es übrigens einen Grund, warum du eine separate Bahnsteigfläche zusätzlich zu den existierenden Bahnsteig(kanten) hinzugefügt hast? commented 2026-08-11 16:26:00 UTC by ManuelB701 ♦272 |
| 187289692 (Comments: 2) | EduLinux (Discussed changesets: 4) | Perfecto. Lo borré porque no tengo los datos del nuevo comercio, pero entiendo, en los casos donde tiene dirección exacta es preferible para mantener la historia. Gracias por la corrección. commented 2026-08-11 16:05:05 UTC by EduLinux ♦4 |
| 172051783 (Comments: 1) | Jauntstar (Discussed changesets: 5) | Is the gate on the road or footpath? It can't be both. commented 2026-08-11 15:50:08 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,797 |
| 187129479 (Comments: 1) | Jauntstar (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello What evidence do you have for tagging this road as foot=no? Pedestrian access is allowed unless explicitly signed. Bing streetside even has pedestrians crossing. Please can you also explain the spread of your edits, have you visite... commented 2026-08-11 15:45:37 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,797 |
| 187290313 (Comments: 1) | ganelous (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ca a l'air bien ! commented 2026-08-11 15:39:39 UTC by zarak_prod ♦2 |
| 177855617 (Comments: 3) | ligfietser (Discussed changesets: 24) | Dank nog voor het snelle verwerken van de nieuwe 30-wegen! Ik wist het ook niet, maar kreeg nu een JOSM waarschuwing en had eerder al eens gezien dat Osmose hier ook over klaagde. commented 2026-08-11 15:28:50 UTC by wouterko ♦11 |
| 187238368 (Comments: 1) | Pipi Ferry 99 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, you broke the Relation 13758524, now it has "gaps" commented 2026-08-11 15:24:25 UTC by micheleOSM3 ♦180 |
| 187280729 (Comments: 1) | Hans Jürgen von Lengerke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Can I help you with anything? You made 10 updates on this particular node in the last month. Happy mapping, Edwin Comino BTC Map commented 2026-08-11 15:23:37 UTC by Comino ♦387 |
| 187219526 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM8 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Добрый вечер! Спасибо за комментарий, обязательно буду учитывать это в следующих правках. commented 2026-08-11 15:21:13 UTC by Ozon OSM8 ♦2 |
| 187266872 (Comments: 1) | 30520 이윤서 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please improve your mapping skils. Check this web page please https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer Best regards commented 2026-08-11 15:19:53 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187264616 (Comments: 2) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=27629580730004137&set=pcb.1437359238225429 commented 2026-08-11 15:17:27 UTC by Blahblah_blah ♦1 |
| 187122720 (Comments: 2) | PikaMap (Discussed changesets: 3) | Avec grand plaisir :) commented 2026-08-11 15:15:17 UTC by PikaMap ♦8 |
| 187286899 (Comments: 1) | Ancrou (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. por favor escribir con capitalización normal. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187286899 commented 2026-08-11 15:07:35 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 186531379 (Comments: 1) | colchaguapangal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Buenos días. Bienvenido a OSM Chile. Cuál es la fuente de estos nombres? no hemos podido encontrar fuentes nosotros. Además, pasa que hay varios de ellos vivos, lo que lo hace bastante curioso. saludos commented 2026-08-11 15:04:47 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187180362 (Comments: 2) | SenorHombre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the information. I mapped it because it appeared to be an emergency water tank. Do you know whether a container is placed at this exact location every fire season, or whether this was only a temporary one-off location? If it is not a regul... commented 2026-08-11 15:02:01 UTC by SenorHombre ♦2 |
| 187287441 (Comments: 1) | mmahmud (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Map round buildings not as a rectangular building, please. Best regards commented 2026-08-11 14:58:29 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187183013 (Comments: 3) | PBoydstun (Discussed changesets: 2) | Great. Thanks. commented 2026-08-11 14:57:36 UTC by b-jazz ♦920 |
| 186844456 (Comments: 3) | omsen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry for the delay, this got buried in my inbox. For this discussion, let's ignore what the definition of a "fairway" is and focus on what was mapped and how it was constructed and tagged. If you look at the first hole f... commented 2026-08-11 14:57:03 UTC by b-jazz ♦920 |
| 187255794 (Comments: 5) | Denial_of_Surveillance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Excellent, thanks so much! Looks like this may just be misplaced on the map then. Your photo shows what looks like a DOT camera next to a paved road, but the spot you've chosen is next to a railroad and dirt track road. Can you double-check the ... commented 2026-08-11 14:43:02 UTC by Xvtn ♦505 |
 | 186492087 (Comments: 1) | trickyrichy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. You clustered here 2 buildings and mapped them as 1 building. Map each building individually. Landuse objects are no part of the instructions. Don't map these features. Best regards commented 2026-08-11 14:29:29 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187287836 (Comments: 1) | MiniLinkPedia (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zastavte sa, pozrite komentáre čo sme vám písali k vašej sade zmien https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187238180 Napríklad pri tom kríži som nebol no som si takmer istý že ten kr... commented 2026-08-11 14:24:57 UTC by EfreetSK ♦29 |
| 187288004 (Comments: 1) | RobbyS63 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bedankt voor het toevoegen. Er gaat wel wat fout. Een paar tips: - We voegen POI's (winkel, bedrijven, etc.) toe aan de bestaande adresnodes. Pas als deze al in gebruik is voegen we een nieuw adres toe. - Voor postcodes hanteren we de spel... commented 2026-08-11 14:16:50 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,168 |
| 185710172 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Added overlooked buildings commented 2026-08-11 14:09:29 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 185711123 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Added buildings commented 2026-08-11 14:06:06 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 185711328 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Added overlooked buildings commented 2026-08-11 14:03:33 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187277527 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello. This is how these buildings ought to be mapped. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=187287872 Best regards commented 2026-08-11 14:01:49 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 186867572 (Comments: 4) | KingOpen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Das habe ich ganz übersehen, dass da bereits eine Ladestation eingetragen. Also ich kann nicht sicher sagen ob an dem nördlichen Punkt auch eine Ladestation ist oder ob die nur falsch gemappt war. Ich habe die von mir gemappte (südlich... commented 2026-08-11 13:57:04 UTC by KingOpen ♦2 |
| 187278125 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Adjusted buildings commented 2026-08-11 13:55:24 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187246901 (Comments: 1) | BeekAV8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've reviewed your changes here. Heads up that in general, changing classification solely to influence specific routing software is frowned upon. But in this case, I agree with your reclassification as tertiary,... commented 2026-08-11 13:54:07 UTC by Xvtn ♦505 |
| 187278314 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Chanded round hut to rectangular buildings commented 2026-08-11 13:53:38 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187278486 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | This is a round building, however, far oversized. I corrected it commented 2026-08-11 13:51:02 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187255179 (Comments: 1) | Nine Design + Web (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've reviewed your changes. Looks great. commented 2026-08-11 13:50:16 UTC by Xvtn ♦505 |
| 187278914 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Changed building into rectangular commented 2026-08-11 13:49:14 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187279109 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Please check this and map accordingly https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer Best regards commented 2026-08-11 13:46:19 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 184532823 (Comments: 1) | Oliver Farník (Discussed changesets: 15) | Construction started? RSD says 2027?? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184532823 commented 2026-08-11 13:42:56 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
| 187278287 (Comments: 1) | samBassaly (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello. Thanks for mapping Please map more accurately and follow the rooflines. Don't cluster buildings like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1548811522/history#map=19/-3.911200/138.442593 Best regards commented 2026-08-11 13:42:18 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187286096 (Comments: 1) | Yulissa Guevara (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Yulissa. Puedes cuadrar los edificios con la letra Q. Estos se nota que están hechos a pulso. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187286096 commented 2026-08-11 13:38:54 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 102698879 (Comments: 5) | Loremo (Discussed changesets: 4) | If it's EGID, ideally it's on the building. As I didn't hear from you, I had to start the poll. The poll runs for about 2 weeks. Let's see where it goes. commented 2026-08-11 13:36:41 UTC by 9_tab ♦111 |
| 151517961 (Comments: 1) | SteelWheel66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I know this is a somewhat old edit, but please don't change correct OpenStreetMap tags just to make them work for a game or another external data consumer. amenity=sushi is not the correct tagging here. The place was already tagged as... commented 2026-08-11 13:20:14 UTC by Vi2727 ♦9 |
| 187220994 (Comments: 1) | Pitosz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cześć, nie dajemy w addr:street "ul." Wartość nazwy ulicy powinna się zgadzać z tą z OSMa, czyli samo "Nefrytowa". Jeśli chodzi o nr to też nie jest to "16/ UH1" tylko samo 16, cokolwiek oznacza U... commented 2026-08-11 13:12:31 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 187282603 (Comments: 7) | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 (Discussed changesets: 192) | 到三官堂大桥这里的都是建材商城，没有敏感区 commented 2026-08-11 13:06:07 UTC by minusmajorityhh ♦13 |
| 187280809 (Comments: 1) | Hermawan S (Discussed changesets: 2) | notaris: office=notary partai: office=political_party fotokopi tapi utamanya jual ATK: shop=stationery commented 2026-08-11 13:05:42 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187101587 (Comments: 1) | Cibelly19 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187284335 commented 2026-08-11 12:56:29 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187102046 (Comments: 1) | Cibelly19 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187284335 commented 2026-08-11 12:56:29 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 184282640 (Comments: 1) | Cibelly19 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187284335 commented 2026-08-11 12:56:28 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 184283206 (Comments: 1) | Cibelly19 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/187284335 commented 2026-08-11 12:56:27 UTC by DressyPear4 ♦1,420 |
| 187277602 (Comments: 1) | Tivimateplayer (Discussed changesets: 1) | The office doesn't occupy the whole building so I've made it a POI node. commented 2026-08-11 12:56:01 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 187228724 (Comments: 4) | Brooklynbull321 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Which it was already tagged for to reflect the Contraflow Bus Gate. `oneway:bus=yes` means buses can only travel in one direction only, not both directions. commented 2026-08-11 12:54:08 UTC by Trafford_Mapper ♦19 |
| 187259770 (Comments: 1) | NicolocoX (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Se pueden cuadrar las casas con la letra Q. Estas fueron hechas a pulso. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187259770 commented 2026-08-11 12:49:43 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| X | 187180066 (Comments: 9) | archie (Discussed changesets: 305) | Det är resultatet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20630890#map=15/56.52746/15.58955). Inga tee:n fastän du lade in två relationer som innehåller dem. Det får vara någon annan som kan förklara bä... commented 2026-08-11 12:46:26 UTC by archie ♦1,365 |
| 187088261 (Comments: 3) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 89) | You're welcome. And don't worry, as long as we keep working together in this constructive manner everything's fine 👍🏻 commented 2026-08-11 12:38:36 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,226 |
| 187088681 (Comments: 2) | Access Claims (komoot) (Discussed changesets: 89) | Danke für den Hinweis. Der Weg wurde uns als privat und für Wanderer sowie die Allgemeinheit nicht zugänglich gemeldet. Die Nutzung soll lediglich für Berechtigte möglich sein. Da über den Weg mehrere Grundstü... commented 2026-08-11 12:25:53 UTC by Access Claims (komoot) ♦78 |
| 187280482 (Comments: 1) | arnocha (Discussed changesets: 2) | merci de faire le nécessaire pour que ce soit visible merci a tous commented 2026-08-11 12:19:14 UTC by arnocha ♦2 |
| 187278776 (Comments: 2) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Ами дървено навесче с маса и пейки. Май имаше и още нещо до него, я парзалка, я някакви нахвърлени работи. commented 2026-08-11 12:16:55 UTC by Kaloan-koko ♦59 |
| 187275219 (Comments: 3) | 1ppm (Discussed changesets: 2) | Eggie, Dankjewel. Ik had wat meer aandacht moeten besteden om wat wijzigingen terug te draaien. Bedankt voor je input hierin. commented 2026-08-11 12:14:11 UTC by 1ppm ♦1 |
| 187248440 (Comments: 2) | alan1209 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Ach quatsch - es ist ja jetzt wieder heile - Ich hab nicht richtig geguckt. Danke commented 2026-08-11 12:01:59 UTC by flohoff ♦2,541 |
| 186462052 (Comments: 5) | Larend (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ich hatte dich angeschrieben, weil du ein Objekt mit dem Tag zuletzt bearbeitet hattest - aber da war ich falsch, du hattest das nicht hinzugefügt. Du kannst einfach in der Historie zurück gehen und nachsehen, hier wurde eines der Mo... commented 2026-08-11 11:57:45 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 185648677 (Comments: 1) | LTA510 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo LTA510, ich habe noch ein paar Verbesserungswünsche, die ich hier changeset/185636892 geschrieben habe, die auch auf diese Straße zutreffen. Ich muss außerdem die Löschung von diesem Radweg way/1338619586 kritisi... commented 2026-08-11 11:37:49 UTC by kadiwa ♦117 |
| 187260301 (Comments: 1) | TECHDEV GPS (Discussed changesets: 13) | Estimado, por favor no realinear calles. la foto que está mirando es circunstancial (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database). Deberá ser corregido. saludos --- Pub... commented 2026-08-11 11:28:40 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187255594 (Comments: 1) | BarryMyles (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! You seem to have tagged the entire residential area around Mayfield with the name Coggins Mill: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98765087 There's already a village node for Coggins Mill north-east of Mayfield: https://www.openstre... commented 2026-08-11 11:26:53 UTC by amosharper ♦58 |
| 187245188 (Comments: 1) | nixetus (Discussed changesets: 4) | такого не бывает, что на лестнице нет подъема. Всегда один конец выше другого. Разберитесь в теге. Вернул commented 2026-08-11 11:19:17 UTC by literan ♦7,196 |
| 185636892 (Comments: 1) | LTA510 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo LTA510, schön zu sehen, dass du Wege in Hamburg genauer eintragen möchtest! Das separate eintragen von Geh- und Radwegen ist allerdings ein wenig komplizierter als das. Erstmal als Hinweis: Geh und Radwege können auc... commented 2026-08-11 11:17:55 UTC by kadiwa ♦117 |
| 185826888 (Comments: 1) | robw (Discussed changesets: 22) | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/can-someone-check-if-road-now-open/146364 commented 2026-08-11 11:17:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187205919 (Comments: 10) | Userinexile (Discussed changesets: 10) | https://imgur.com/a/kmxKXB5 说实在的，这个森林直接整个的穿过一条道路，这样的话谁看到都要多花点力气去修正吧，不是说不够好，它确实是比没有要好，但是对于有多人协作的区域来说... commented 2026-08-11 11:16:22 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦596 |
| 187188238 (Comments: 2) | GoldraK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I stopped by yesterday and noted the schedules. I'll try to go back this week to check them again. commented 2026-08-11 11:14:54 UTC by GoldraK ♦1 |
| 178830650 (Comments: 2) | Konfarter (Discussed changesets: 10) | Nazwy tymczasowe do momentu zatwierdzenia, by nie konfliktowały ze starymi nazwami stacji znajdujących się w innych miejscach (OHM). commented 2026-08-11 11:14:25 UTC by Konfarter ♦8 |
| 187074796 (Comments: 1) | shalaginov_kg (Discussed changesets: 2) | не надо портить адреса. Ознакомьтесь с используемым форматом: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов commented 2026-08-11 11:13:32 UTC by literan ♦7,196 |
| 187266563 (Comments: 1) | 30603 김수민 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please map more accurately, square the buildings and do not cluster them. Best regards commented 2026-08-11 10:58:37 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187032578 (Comments: 2) | lukky_73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am sorry. I was dumb. I am new to this platform and I was previously using Mapy.com, where the categories are slightly different (for example, there is one category for both planned and under-construction roads). Now I don’t know how to ch... commented 2026-08-11 10:58:16 UTC by lukky_73 ♦1 |
| 187263937 (Comments: 3) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | ОК, добре, че отговори. За второто се съмнявам, по-скоро са били двама, някога. commented 2026-08-11 10:56:41 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 187278044 (Comments: 1) | Ali Behbudov (Discussed changesets: 10) | Helllo. IMPORTANT !!! Please don't map buildings as a circle. Follow the rooflines accurately. Best regards commented 2026-08-11 10:53:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187194338 (Comments: 1) | TheUKHighStreet (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi, this store is closed for a long time. M&S left Russia. commented 2026-08-11 10:51:18 UTC by literan ♦7,196 |
| 187213393 (Comments: 1) | antisentimenti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187277659 commented 2026-08-11 10:43:41 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187242107 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 167) | Jak living street to jeszcze maxspeed/source:maxspeed :P commented 2026-08-11 10:36:56 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 187266637 (Comments: 1) | 경신여고 김민서 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. PLease map more accurate and square the building you map Best regards commented 2026-08-11 10:30:18 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187273781 (Comments: 1) | FFFinnentrop_Import (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction/addendum for this changeset: the source data date is 2025-06-27. The intended changeset comment wording for Rönkhausen batches is: comment=Import fire hydrants in Finnentrop / Rönkhausen; source: Gemeinde Finnentrop hydrant data;... commented 2026-08-11 10:23:10 UTC by FFFinnentrop_Import ♦1 |
| 187272920 (Comments: 1) | seeksthemoon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-11 10:23:09 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187129208 (Comments: 2) | Bilykralik16 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Dzięki za ostrzeżenie, dodałem tag commented 2026-08-11 10:16:51 UTC by Bilykralik16 ♦17 |
| 187213437 (Comments: 1) | Oliver Farník (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zdravím. Jaké je zdůvodnění téhle úpravy nebo jiné úpravy u Nové Hospody? highway=trunk se podle konvence používá uvnitř obce pouze, pokud jde o silnici pro motorov&aacu... commented 2026-08-11 10:15:02 UTC by Fjana ♦43 |
| 187266367 (Comments: 1) | knk080828 (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-08-11 10:08:37 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187269051 (Comments: 4) | OSM078 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Goedemiddag, Ik had 2 losse tracks, 1 voor het doorgaande fietspad, en 1 voor de aansluiting. Ik was wat aan het stoeien met hoe deze moest worden opgevoerd dus heb het in 2 delen gedaan. Het kattenwiel zelf ben ik verder vanaf gebleven, h... commented 2026-08-11 10:07:28 UTC by OSM078 ♦3 |
| 187267945 (Comments: 1) | FilipCh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Filip, Thank you for your edits! Unfortunately OpenStreetMap is not a place for mapping no longer existing objects. For such objects please consider OpenHistoricalMap which is built specifically for such objects. https://wiki.open... commented 2026-08-11 10:06:00 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 183606544 (Comments: 3) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi EräsHenkilö, thank you for reaching out. I missed checking the local Finland guidelines and instead relied on the general OSM highway classifications. I assumed that highway=unclassified was the appropriate classification. Thank you for ... commented 2026-08-11 10:02:25 UTC by BR_pebble ♦109 |
| 177846822 (Comments: 1) | Tann blev (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, J'ai l'impression que tu as ajouté ces arceaux à l'aveuglette, sans vérifier sur place. Si c'est le cas, ajouter un fixme du genre "fixme=à vérifier sur place" aurait &ea... commented 2026-08-11 09:57:50 UTC by josmougn ♦272 |
| 147272301 (Comments: 3) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 181) | Sure! Thanks again for that contribution :) I will try to improve it. commented 2026-08-11 09:55:40 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦51 |
| 183033061 (Comments: 3) | ReinerMeyer (Discussed changesets: 97) | Habe ich gemacht, danke für die schnelle Antwort! commented 2026-08-11 09:41:14 UTC by Tordanik ♦10 |
| 187274156 (Comments: 1) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 309) | Closed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187274156 commented 2026-08-11 09:37:07 UTC by TheSwavu ♦668 |
| 187223411 (Comments: 1) | Oliver Farník (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zdravím, tohle pojmenování se někde používá? Setkal jsem se dosud jen s fonetickým "Cvízl" nebo s historickým "Svízel," ale takto dosud nikde. --- ... commented 2026-08-11 09:32:28 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
| 187272552 (Comments: 1) | Oliver Farník (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zdravím, ani toto neodpovídá stavu v terénu. Z jakých podkladů, prosím, mapujete? Rovněž by se hodilo popisovat úpravy nějak jinak než "náhodně mačkám klávesy." C... commented 2026-08-11 09:29:51 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
| 187271220 (Comments: 1) | Pista Motorsport (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've reverted this changeset to remove the duplications. Everything you added was placed on top of existing features. Please don't keep doing this. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-08-11 09:25:52 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 187269419 (Comments: 1) | Pista Motorsport (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, Sorry to say that this changeset added a node with no tags; it's therefore of no use in OSM, as it contains no data. I've removed it. I moved a nearby existing node onto the imagery start-finish line and tagged it as per OSM practice ra... commented 2026-08-11 09:16:59 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
 | 186276308 (Comments: 1) | KarenLLL (Discussed changesets: 2) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2026-08-11 09:11:47 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187272375 (Comments: 1) | Mzomba2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are the added names real? commented 2026-08-11 09:09:00 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 170014143 (Comments: 1) | Alexandre Luedo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Salut ! Tu as ajouté Veolia Eau en tant que point d'eau potable, mais après passage sur place (parce que je cherchais de l'eau), je suis tombé sur un hangar Veolia mais pas du tout de point d'eau. Ça a l... commented 2026-08-11 09:08:05 UTC by nuitsfauves ♦16 |
| 187269674 (Comments: 1) | Madéquis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are these name:eo values established Esperanto names that are actually in use, or are they translations of the existing English names? Thanks. commented 2026-08-11 09:04:02 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187259386 (Comments: 1) | Madéquis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are these name:eo values established Esperanto names that are actually in use, or are they translations of the existing English names? Thanks. commented 2026-08-11 09:03:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187257382 (Comments: 1) | Madéquis (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Are these name:eo values established Esperanto names that are actually in use, or are they translations of the existing English names? Thanks. commented 2026-08-11 09:03:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 187105283 (Comments: 1) | trickyrichy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. I am reviewing your mappings. Please map more accurately and square all rectangular buildings. On this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1547979707/history#map=19/5.610497/-0.184093 you included the adjacent parking plac... commented 2026-08-11 08:58:41 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187270596 (Comments: 1) | DonQui (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-11 08:53:53 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
 | 187242083 (Comments: 3) | Thomas Parrott (Discussed changesets: 5) | You can go to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Thomas%20Parrott/history where you see all your previous edits. Some of them have a speech bubble with a number next to them. Those have comments attached which is a strong indicator that you might wan... commented 2026-08-11 08:48:59 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,226 |
| 187257313 (Comments: 1) | SharpeSerana (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi SharpeSerana, It seems like some of your recent changes have broken validation of the Transilien network in the subway validator: https://mapgen-fi-1.comaps.app/subway/validator/france.html In general every route variant should just ... commented 2026-08-11 08:48:21 UTC by Bovi887 ♦17 |
| 169184474 (Comments: 1) | Tommy Tokoto (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Tommy Tokoto, es gibt da eine Frage zu dem "kunstvollen Liftmasten", den du vor einigen Monaten eingetragen hast. Kannst du bitte hier schauen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5314454 und daganzdaandas Frage beantwor... commented 2026-08-11 08:44:36 UTC by söm4324 ♦71 |
| 187270115 (Comments: 1) | niceguydave (Discussed changesets: 2) | An image of the altered feature is now visible at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paved_area_where_fountain_used_to_be_outside_Scotstoun_Leisure_Centre.jpg commented 2026-08-11 08:40:35 UTC by niceguydave ♦2 |
| 187204578 (Comments: 1) | siycles (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187261904 commented 2026-08-11 08:38:09 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
 | 187134649 (Comments: 2) | trickyrichy (Discussed changesets: 3) | Measuring Road Width in iD Editor To accurately measure the width of a road in the iD editor, follow these steps: Using the Ruler Tool Activate the Ruler Tool: In the iD editor, locate and select the ruler tool from th... commented 2026-08-11 08:35:26 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187190668 (Comments: 1) | LILIAN NIETO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187220763 commented 2026-08-11 08:32:13 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187199445 (Comments: 1) | thorYorak (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187218153 commented 2026-08-11 08:31:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187267498 (Comments: 1) | KarlBani (Discussed changesets: 2) | I marked this closed, was that a mistake. My aim was to get this recorded on the map. It's a good location with a good path and I want to encourage more people to go there commented 2026-08-11 08:26:32 UTC by KarlBani ♦2 |
| 187168897 (Comments: 1) | 樺太庁 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187217719 commented 2026-08-11 08:25:49 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187166213 (Comments: 2) | nevo halali (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187216698 commented 2026-08-11 08:23:36 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
 | 187189849 (Comments: 1) | mariya2001 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187215201 commented 2026-08-11 08:22:33 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
 | 187187170 (Comments: 1) | La Mairie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187214375 commented 2026-08-11 08:21:49 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187269885 (Comments: 1) | Bauxite (Discussed changesets: 6) | Note par souci de clarté : la Coulée ne passe pas au travers de l’immeuble w78019451 comme un tunnel ; l’immeuble « s’ouvre en deux » pour laisser passer la Coulée. La Coulée ... commented 2026-08-11 08:14:19 UTC by Bauxite ♦10 |
| 185845125 (Comments: 4) | Erik_ (Discussed changesets: 9) | Danke, kein Problem passiert. Hab's erledigt. commented 2026-08-11 08:10:48 UTC by onterof ♦53 |
| 187172093 (Comments: 5) | Neubi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hm, das mit den Bäumen - ganz ehrlich, dazu fällt mir keine Lösung ein. Man könnte einzelne Bäume mappen, aber wer will das schon . . commented 2026-08-11 08:09:11 UTC by einufo ♦8 |
| 187269406 (Comments: 1) | Taksine (Discussed changesets: 51) | 捉 commented 2026-08-11 08:07:37 UTC by Kanoxitu_zh ♦4 |
| 160629259 (Comments: 8) | Geim (Discussed changesets: 83) | Das sind ausschliesslich MTB-Runs mit Fussgängerverbot. In anderen von mir angeschauten Bikeparks war das immer "Pfad", nur hier in Serfaus "Radweg" (was ja von der Logik her völlig falsch ist). commented 2026-08-11 08:03:24 UTC by Delli1951 ♦11 |
| 175969507 (Comments: 3) | Peer van Daalen (Discussed changesets: 64) | Wenn "das" auf die Tageslaune ankommt, kann sich "das" nur auf den Physisch-offen-Status beziehen. Wenn verschlossen oder nicht verschlossen ebenfalls von der Tageslaune abhinge, wäre die ganze Notiz nutzlos. Di... commented 2026-08-11 08:00:32 UTC by LingM ♦12 |
| 184386204 (Comments: 1) | zhovancheto (Discussed changesets: 1) | Здравей, Плачковци е маркирано неправилно като place=city. В България използваме този таг за поне областни градове. commented 2026-08-11 07:55:32 UTC by foreigner037 ♦87 |
| 187233962 (Comments: 1) | redleo85 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Guten Morgen! könntest Du Dir way 101248836 nochmal genauer ansehen? Das war ein EDEKA ohne Öffnungszeiten. Jetzt ist es ein Gebäude ohne Edeka aber mit Öffnungszeiten... Weiter happy mapping! commented 2026-08-11 07:52:46 UTC by Senihtu ♦185 |
| 187070362 (Comments: 2) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 17) | Bonjour, Merci pour le signalement et pour la vérification sur place, et merci d'avoir reporté les attributs sur le bon emplacement. L'erreur vient bien de chez nous : notre donnée source contenait encore ... commented 2026-08-11 07:50:46 UTC by Digitaleo ♦22 |
| 183551178 (Comments: 1) | Edawyt3425 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Poprawka czego? Prośba o nazywanie swoich zmian opisowo, np. Dodanie nowych dróg, poprawka obrysów budynków itp. Zmiany o nazwach "Poprawiłem" albo "poprawka tego" nic nie wnoszą i zmuszają innych mapper&o... commented 2026-08-11 07:45:55 UTC by LuGo91 ♦4 |
| 187149454 (Comments: 2) | armnd21 (Discussed changesets: 7) | See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-deleting-all-the-houses/146356 Please explain why you are mass-deleting buildings. commented 2026-08-11 07:32:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
 | 187207823 (Comments: 1) | Royal Kitchen Patong Indian Restaurant (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-11 07:28:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 73485376 (Comments: 1) | Ivaylo Z (Discussed changesets: 2) | Здравей Ивайло, Сигурен ли си че КАТ (или "Пътна полиция" към днешна дата) се намира в Момчилград? Настоящия им адрес би трябвало ... commented 2026-08-11 07:27:53 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 187223647 (Comments: 2) | Megtech (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-08-11 07:26:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187252411 (Comments: 2) | A67-A67 (Discussed changesets: 395) | De suggesties in de iD-editor zijn slechts suggesties , geen foutmeldingen. Deze komen uit de Name Suggestion Index (NSI), die verre van compleet en correct is. commented 2026-08-11 07:22:10 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,168 |
| 187249172 (Comments: 1) | Dr Ronald Atanay DDS (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-11 07:20:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187216653 (Comments: 1) | whiskey_dazai00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. |
| 187212447 (Comments: 1) | GVitalik (Discussed changesets: 11) | As I've already explained to you in changeset 187140083 and you acknowledged, **information from Google Maps and other Google products cannot be copied into OpenStreetMap**. This must be immediately removed, as well as any other information deri... commented 2026-08-11 07:16:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187212251 (Comments: 1) | GVitalik (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello again GVitalik, It seems despite my feedback on changeset 187140083 and your assurances that you would fix this issue, both a day prior to this changeset, and despite being an experienced OSM mapper, you've once again explicitly cit... commented 2026-08-11 07:15:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187266594 (Comments: 1) | okadatsuneo_import (Discussed changesets: 20) | 51337785が正 commented 2026-08-11 07:15:06 UTC by okadatsuneo_import ♦22 |
| 187266602 (Comments: 1) | okadatsuneo_import (Discussed changesets: 20) | 51337785が正 commented 2026-08-11 07:14:52 UTC by okadatsuneo_import ♦22 |
| 187181859 (Comments: 3) | Igor582 (Discussed changesets: 4) | > Разумеется общую точку иметь не могут Тогда и общую точку добавлять на карте для них не нужно. > но пересекаются <... commented 2026-08-11 07:07:20 UTC by mavl ♦77,092 |
| 187215432 (Comments: 2) | Simon-Says (Discussed changesets: 2) | Servus, ich hatte hier nachgelesen. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/radweg-in-einer-richtung-fussweg-radfahrer-frei-in-der-anderen/5305/11 Wenn man weiter liest wird die Frage aufgeworfen, ob das im Routing so verwendet wer... commented 2026-08-11 06:55:02 UTC by Simon-Says ♦1 |
| 187210666 (Comments: 1) | Buran0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187266681 commented 2026-08-11 06:54:26 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187225678 (Comments: 2) | Duški Kubov (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ospravedlňujem sa, chyba opravená. commented 2026-08-11 06:36:07 UTC by Duški Kubov ♦8 |
| 187162933 (Comments: 1) | Pars Polymerco (Discussed changesets: 1) | شما رابطه کلی پایانه بوتان به گلدسته که یک خط اتوبوسرانی است را پاک کردید بخاطر اینکه پارس پلیمرتون رو اضافه کنید؟ این رابطه خراب نبود ب... commented 2026-08-11 06:33:52 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦37 |
| 187208710 (Comments: 1) | isp127 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187265675 commented 2026-08-11 06:29:10 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 185905725 (Comments: 1) | Ryan_Ritchie (Discussed changesets: 10) | partially reverted in changeset/187265256 commented 2026-08-11 06:15:51 UTC by Joel Koen ♦42 |
| 185912313 (Comments: 1) | Ryan_Ritchie (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted in changeset/187264855 commented 2026-08-11 06:12:36 UTC by Joel Koen ♦42 |
| 185914212 (Comments: 1) | Ryan_Ritchie (Discussed changesets: 10) | reverted in changeset/187264812 commented 2026-08-11 06:12:23 UTC by Joel Koen ♦42 |
| 185913230 (Comments: 1) | Ryan_Ritchie (Discussed changesets: 10) | partially reverted in changeset/187265071 commented 2026-08-11 06:12:18 UTC by Joel Koen ♦42 |
| 187013833 (Comments: 1) | VikasChandra_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | This edit is incorrect. This area has been reconfigured as of early August. commented 2026-08-11 05:54:08 UTC by jay88g ♦2 |
| 177084333 (Comments: 2) | paul1764 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Yes, that is a mistake, I will fix it now. Thank you for pointing that out! Paul commented 2026-08-11 05:26:51 UTC by paul1764 ♦1 |
| 187206500 (Comments: 1) | Josipa77777 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187263555 commented 2026-08-11 05:23:42 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
 | 187263482 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 116) | For context, the time zone polygons, which span multiple countries, had gaps that needed to be closed. commented 2026-08-11 05:22:24 UTC by ika-chan! ♦424 |
| 187262914 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 100) | Discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171657410 commented 2026-08-11 05:09:00 UTC by eerib ♦370 |
| 171657410 (Comments: 3) | Wild Coast (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dear Wild Coast, I have confirmed that this cabin has not burned down and have therefore restored it in Changeset #187262914. It appears that this cabin may have been confused with another nearby cabin. I have added additional details t... commented 2026-08-11 05:08:50 UTC by eerib ♦370 |
| 187254464 (Comments: 2) | Patrick_E_NL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Furthermore (as @eggie helpfully restored for you), even if the restaurant is closed, the address itself presumably still exists and is valid, so you should not delete the entire POI but rather only the tags that are no longer valid (name=*, amenity=... commented 2026-08-11 05:05:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187253750 (Comments: 1) | Ommenabij (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dam OeNB, Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd. Er is hier al een adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-11 05:03:42 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187113554 (Comments: 1) | SimplifiedCactus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi SimplifiedCactus, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The bus stop shelter (way/1548029826) does not need to be added to the bus route relation (relation/20411858), so I've removed it from that (changeset/187262774). You m... commented 2026-08-11 05:02:24 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦110 |
| 187254807 (Comments: 1) | Sven73 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-11 05:00:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187253738 (Comments: 1) | Roy van Vizibly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-11 04:55:01 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187249347 (Comments: 1) | couder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-11 04:53:33 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187231980 (Comments: 1) | ארץ ישראל הטובה מאוד מאוד 2026 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187262531 commented 2026-08-11 04:47:34 UTC by MappingMore ♦646 |
| 187241851 (Comments: 1) | qgmzmy (Discussed changesets: 5) | FYI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187205919#c1642441 commented 2026-08-11 04:06:30 UTC by Userinexile ♦11 |
| 181788713 (Comments: 2) | Coslog (Discussed changesets: 4) | If you think the name tag value in any changset has any problem, go ahead to improve it. But you or any editors should not revert other editors' informative changset. Respect others' contribution. commented 2026-08-11 04:00:04 UTC by Coslog ♦4 |
| 187253066 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 12) | can you explain why you have decided that the aeroway, track, and driveway are all also part of "Yukon Circle"? commented 2026-08-11 03:51:56 UTC by citrula ♦1,004 |
| 186584585 (Comments: 1) | CBradioCZ (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi CBradioCZ, it looks like you've done an large-scale import of these parcel lockers, but have not provided a source nor a link to the wiki page or discussion about this import. Can you please provide these details? Thanks, Max... commented 2026-08-11 03:33:34 UTC by maxwellward ♦30 |
| 187192543 (Comments: 3) | Kayleeuk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kaylee, Thanks for the quick and considerable reply, and I really appreciate your understanding--sorry if I was at all harsh! I mostly deal with hundreds of accounts operated by offshore SEO outfits that just exist to spew out as many low-q... commented 2026-08-11 03:22:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 7038091 (Comments: 1) | Gary Cox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are you sure that the park would go as far as naming their pools "Water Slide Pool", "Main pool" and "water slide launch" and name the concession stand "Concessions"? I doubt the park would go as far as to name... commented 2026-08-11 03:16:00 UTC by O1S ♦27 |
| 187122321 (Comments: 1) | LoicHe (Discussed changesets: 1) | There's already a public transport stop at this location. What's the purpose of this stop? commented 2026-08-11 03:05:05 UTC by kaminyv ♦1 |
| 187249851 (Comments: 4) | O1S (Discussed changesets: 53) | I managed to find their email, so I've sent 'em one of those too commented 2026-08-11 02:55:10 UTC by O1S ♦27 |
| 185822142 (Comments: 4) | JacobyMeyers (Discussed changesets: 6) | ...I rest my case 🔨 commented 2026-08-11 02:48:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187160847 (Comments: 3) | iamakshayjain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-11 02:45:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦294 |
| 187181487 (Comments: 3) | Fach-Stal Krzysztof jeleńkowski (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks, and I appreciate your understanding! commented 2026-08-11 02:44:25 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 153334518 (Comments: 1) | Hack-o-lantern (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hey! You did a super nice job on this building. Trying to fix up the raildeck park as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5448908# There's updated imagery if you wanted to have a go at the second half of this complex across the railw... commented 2026-08-11 02:42:47 UTC by Shrinks99 ♦23 |
| 187253785 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 30) | Gotcha, thanks! commented 2026-08-11 02:40:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187157148 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 4) | The mapper attested to this node being properly placed. commented 2026-08-11 02:34:30 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦264 |
| 187260000 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted improper tagging. access=no is not possible when the road hasn't even started construction. Please begin replying to questions and feedback in changesets! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187260208 commented 2026-08-11 02:25:31 UTC by mewhenthe ♦19 |
| 187161300 (Comments: 1) | wo扬 (Discussed changesets: 3) | way 1548236817 reverted by changeset/187260051 commented 2026-08-11 02:14:35 UTC by DetectiveConan ♦21 |
| 187238481 (Comments: 1) | MiniLinkPedia (Discussed changesets: 7) | to je nejaky vtip? ved ste ten nazov znicili! commented 2026-08-11 01:13:37 UTC by Jose Riha ♦198 |
| 177661916 (Comments: 1) | Jonaes (Discussed changesets: 16) | knot/2493153587 ist aktuell nur als knot hinterlegt. Müsste auch noch genauso gemappt werden wie way/1470117887 commented 2026-08-11 00:59:28 UTC by nlysup ♦2 |
| 187258769 (Comments: 1) | nlysup (Discussed changesets: 2) | Simples Hinzufügen der Öffnungszeiten commented 2026-08-11 00:48:13 UTC by nlysup ♦2 |
| 187258474 (Comments: 1) | letaazul (Discussed changesets: 2) | maxspeed=none stämmer egentligen inte eftersom att det finns en implicit maxhastighet, men resten av spårvägen är taggad så och jag är inte säker på vad den faktiska maxhastigheten är (gissningsvis 60 e... commented 2026-08-11 00:19:52 UTC by letaazul ♦2 |
| 187073987 (Comments: 1) | T sz L ski (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hej. Na jakiej podstawie zmieniłeś tę drogę na tertiary? Póki co służy jedynie jako dojazdowa do budowy lub do nowopowstających magazynów i prowadzi donikąd. commented 2026-08-10 23:39:20 UTC by ppece ♦24 |
| 149942585 (Comments: 1) | Ottofix2 (Discussed changesets: 3) | "Vorübergehend geschlossen" ist jetzt über zwei Jahre her. Gibt es das En de Höll noch? commented 2026-08-10 23:02:13 UTC by LingM ♦12 |
| 187210070 (Comments: 1) | bwbbly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetmap and thanks for contributing! I'd appreciate it if you wrote more detail into changeset comments, describing what you changed and why. For example, "Added house addresses from local knowledge, and improve geometry us... commented 2026-08-10 22:56:31 UTC by impiaaa ♦489 |
| 187209987 (Comments: 1) | voluptuous (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetmap and thanks for contributing! Please note that OSM is a public map used by many apps and websites. As such, we shouldn't map private information, such as the names of the inhabitants of a house. Read more here: https://wi... commented 2026-08-10 22:53:43 UTC by impiaaa ♦489 |
| 187255905 (Comments: 1) | SixSevenIsTheBest (Discussed changesets: 12) | Reverted due to incorrect reclassification. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187256952 commented 2026-08-10 22:48:01 UTC by mewhenthe ♦19 |
| 187097338 (Comments: 2) | bibi6 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Have you checked with any data consumers of the tags you are changing? commented 2026-08-10 22:39:17 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,848 |
| 187038575 (Comments: 1) | bibi6 (Discussed changesets: 19) | This looks very much like a mechanical edit. Did you go through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits and discuss these changes with any consumers of these tags? commented 2026-08-10 22:31:59 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,848 |
| 101240282 (Comments: 1) | niki88z (Discussed changesets: 20) | Здравей Ники, Това "ж.к. КАТ" реално съществуващ обект ли е? В интернет не намирам да се споменава някъде. Предполагаемо правилни... commented 2026-08-10 22:30:55 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 187243841 (Comments: 1) | MiniLinkPedia (Discussed changesets: 7) | Zdravim, z akeho zdroja ste zistili nazov? Ziadny neuvadzate a to by ste mali. commented 2026-08-10 22:27:52 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,996 |
| 187238059 (Comments: 1) | Anas masuris (Discussed changesets: 167) | Dzięki commented 2026-08-10 22:27:47 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦932 |
| 187254395 (Comments: 2) | NIINOI (Discussed changesets: 1) | For more about OpenStreetMap see https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/ commented 2026-08-10 22:27:02 UTC by Enock4seth ♦657 |
| 177408287 (Comments: 1) | MOHAMMED_IBRAHIM_KOJO (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi MOHAMMED_IBRAHIM_KOJO, Thanks for mapping. Use title case for name=*, i.e "Lemam Dika Mosque" instead of all CAPS "LEMAM DIKA MOSQUES". Also avoid using generic names for the name=* key. The name of the mosque is not &qu... commented 2026-08-10 22:21:35 UTC by Enock4seth ♦657 |
| 183355515 (Comments: 1) | Xcm81 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, the multiple ways to represent the bridge is intentional. It is common to map bridges as: (1) a highway/railway way down the centre tagged with bridge=yes; and, (2) a bridge area around the outline of the bridge structure tagged with man_made=bri... commented 2026-08-10 22:20:57 UTC by lakedistrict ♦333 |
| 187253351 (Comments: 3) | Demowa (Discussed changesets: 8) | Dear Dan, it seems you do not understand the access tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access Private means "Public access is not allowed". But when i am using the sidewalk i can use the path to the street but not to th... commented 2026-08-10 22:09:39 UTC by Strubbl ♦609 |
| 187238214 (Comments: 1) | SK@ (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi SK@, same as one of my previous comments. Also use multiple aerial imagery. commented 2026-08-10 22:08:42 UTC by Enock4seth ♦657 |
| 187252912 (Comments: 3) | Demowa (Discussed changesets: 8) | It is not tagged as a bike path. it is tagged as informal path! You are using the access tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access Please read that page. Public access for bicycles is not prohibited there. So we should not ... commented 2026-08-10 22:06:45 UTC by Strubbl ♦609 |
| 187253984 (Comments: 1) | SomeoneElse (Discussed changesets: 474) | Also ts2784a to Stalybridge. Huddersfield Narrow Canal. commented 2026-08-10 22:02:23 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,848 |
| 181672414 (Comments: 1) | Mappomo (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hallo Mappomo, Du hast beim Kosmetikinstitut Scheben als Öffnungszeiten "D-Fr 10:00-18:00" eingetragen. Steht das "D" für Dienstag oder für Donnerstag? (Laut Spezifikation müssten auch die... commented 2026-08-10 22:01:25 UTC by LingM ♦12 |
| 181514281 (Comments: 1) | jetbridge guy (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi there, would you mind sharing what your source was for these speed limits, if you can still recall it? Thanks! commented 2026-08-10 21:47:43 UTC by VigilantPenguin ♦35 |
| 187250823 (Comments: 1) | m@rio (Discussed changesets: 152) | widzę, że teraz ty się bawisz w zmiany. Wycofaj je, bo temat był już grubo wałkowany w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186850225 również omówiony na discordzie https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/102607... commented 2026-08-10 21:43:47 UTC by Yog Sot ♦536 |
| 186599327 (Comments: 1) | ericasmap (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi ericasmap, what are you trying to map? There is definitely no playground at the intersection / middle of the road. commented 2026-08-10 21:39:58 UTC by Enock4seth ♦657 |
| 187252716 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Amanita Campground (way/1540799078) + Rainbow Point Campground (way/1540799081). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:40 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252688 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Fir Creek Campground (node/3176860361) + Thatcher Campground (node/3759322933). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:37 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252665 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Trap Creek Campground (node/3759322918) + Sheep Trail Campground (node/3759330390). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:34 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252644 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Iron Creek Campground (way/611712657) + Sunny Gulch Campground (way/1188750462). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:31 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252467 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Buttercup Campground (way/1540799073) + Huckleberry Campground (way/1540799077). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:28 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187252397 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Summary correction: this changeset updated Bull Trout Campground (way/1534463792) + Banner Creek Campground (node/3759321571). The object tags and source field are correct; both final tag sets were API-verified on 2026-08-10. commented 2026-08-10 21:37:01 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187242092 (Comments: 1) | SK@ (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks for mapping. I think mechanical edits of this kind should care for tags such as "name=ROMAN CHURCH" commented 2026-08-10 21:34:26 UTC by Enock4seth ♦657 |
| 187254237 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21083 commented 2026-08-10 21:26:36 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,706 |
| 150897457 (Comments: 6) | PluMGMK (Discussed changesets: 27) | I'm not sure… I think actual transformers are a lot more common than these, so the risk is pretty low. But it may indeed have happened in some instances! commented 2026-08-10 21:22:02 UTC by PluMGMK ♦24 |
| 184910096 (Comments: 1) | Gianma_vero1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, ho corretto quello che penso stessi cercando di mappare qui. hgv=no e altri tag di accesso non dovrebbero essere messi su un normale punto della strada, ma sulla strada a cui si applicano. Inoltre, access=yes, hgv=no era stato ins... commented 2026-08-10 21:20:27 UTC by Vi2727 ♦9 |
| 96618184 (Comments: 1) | WUSCH1463 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hallo Wusch1463, Du hast hier den Fischbach bei Hundsbach aus der Natureg Gewässerkarte übernommen. Der Bach heisst aber nicht Fischbach, sondern Fisch-Bach, zur Unterscheidung zum weiter östlich liegenden Fischbach. Auße... commented 2026-08-10 21:17:59 UTC by Map_HeRo ♦109 |
| 187228576 (Comments: 11) | tms13 (Discussed changesets: 85) | 👍🏻 commented 2026-08-10 21:03:37 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,226 |
| 187178334 (Comments: 3) | Freewheeling Easy (Discussed changesets: 1) | You should be able to still tag the main Forbes Ave in a way that represents that. I'm not super familiar with the how that type of routing works best commented 2026-08-10 20:59:30 UTC by erokore ♦1 |
| 187245029 (Comments: 2) | DeeBeeDouble (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah yes, sorry, my bad, I saw it wrong. commented 2026-08-10 20:57:09 UTC by DeeBeeDouble ♦1 |
| 187253510 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 15) | thank you banana commented 2026-08-10 20:55:13 UTC by finn-hound ♦33 |
| 186538016 (Comments: 2) | Shjosan (Discussed changesets: 1) | It was suppose to be "lst:area=21.06" to tell the area, in hectare, the nature reserve covers as reported by the government. But did a mistake and saved it wrongly. Have now updated it to "lst:area_ha=21.06" to also include ... commented 2026-08-10 20:48:38 UTC by Shjosan ♦1 |
| 187048422 (Comments: 3) | MartinSpiertz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Martin, das ist überhaupt nicht kritisch und muss nicht unbedingt zurückgesetzt werden. Wichtig war mir nur, dass Du nicht ewig so weitermachst. Viele Grüße, Joachim commented 2026-08-10 20:30:55 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,453 |
| 187252036 (Comments: 1) | bielebog (Discussed changesets: 112) | Moin :) ist das nicht schon ein power=plant statt generator? cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187252036 commented 2026-08-10 20:26:07 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,226 |
| 187158156 (Comments: 1) | Nisza_Alex39 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Los limites entre entidades Administrativas territoriales (Distritos, Provincias, etc) los determinamos mediante la fuente oficial del INEI Perú. commented 2026-08-10 20:25:15 UTC by TuAmigoElEditor ♦73 |
| 187104661 (Comments: 2) | t_ja (Discussed changesets: 18) | Ahoj, celkom ma prekvapilo, ze si zaregoval, nakolko vacsina mojich minulych komentarov k tvojim sadam zmien zostala nielen bez odpovede, ale aj bez napravy... Preto som uz ani nepisal, ale kedze som mal chvilu cas, radsej som ho investoval do ... commented 2026-08-10 20:24:29 UTC by t_ja ♦292 |
| 187252203 (Comments: 1) | Kckircher (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source metadata correction: this changeset’s source field accidentally retained URLs from the immediately preceding pair. The correct official sources are https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/sawtooth/recreation/pioneer-campground and https://www.fs.usd... commented 2026-08-10 20:13:45 UTC by Kckircher ♦13 |
| 187220453 (Comments: 1) | Oliver Farník (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zdravím, na základě čeho se tohle změnilo z primary na trunk? (Všimněte si předchozího rozdílu v úseku Jíloviště-Zbraslav a Zbraslav-Zlíchov) commented 2026-08-10 20:13:34 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
| 187053876 (Comments: 1) | gargantuapantagruel (Discussed changesets: 8) | Kolejny raz brak podanych źródeł. Jak nie wiesz czy coś istnieje, czy nie to albo się nie dotyka, albo przywraca do stanu proposed/construction, a nie dodaje access=no. Ten tag to nie jest magiczne rozwiązanie na wszystko. Wręcz p... commented 2026-08-10 20:08:16 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,430 |
| 182394386 (Comments: 3) | caistk (Discussed changesets: 19) | kąpielisko na razie usunąłem, budowa nieropoczęta i nieogrodzona commented 2026-08-10 20:05:06 UTC by zgroza ♦7 |
| 120721188 (Comments: 4) | Ibot123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kann man machen oder man prüft, ob dort einer anderen Nummerierung ist. Dann kann man die nennen. commented 2026-08-10 20:02:28 UTC by Ibot123 ♦2 |
| 187249629 (Comments: 2) | weblogdryads (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks! I made a preset on GoMap and I have fixed it now for when I do future mapping commented 2026-08-10 19:45:58 UTC by weblogdryads ♦33 |
| 187119280 (Comments: 7) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | Btw, те се виждат и на Bing Streetside. Цъкни на балончето северно от https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4987239009 commented 2026-08-10 19:42:40 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 186029367 (Comments: 4) | AlaskaDave (Discussed changesets: 66) | I just checked - I was looking at at different road when I replied a couple of minutes ago. So, discard that reply. I'll change the tagging <grin> commented 2026-08-10 19:41:04 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦181 |
| 181211367 (Comments: 5) | greggerm (Discussed changesets: 3) | @StreetSurveyor what's the "road under construction" feature? It is preferable to name the proper tags because that's unambiguous. If you mean highway=construction then I'd like to point out that existing features that... commented 2026-08-10 19:36:01 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,226 |
| 173156925 (Comments: 2) | Styvooo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour. Ces modifications datent d'il y a presque un an quand je venais juste de créer les design:ref dont la plupart sont répertoriés ici avec les caractéristiques communes : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/P... commented 2026-08-10 19:32:00 UTC by Styvooo ♦2 |
| 186549446 (Comments: 6) | Mark Brockway (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks b-jazz — the before/afters were useful and from these I can tell that when I was doing my work I was using a background map that was not as clear on the fairway/green/fringe definitions as what you were using - I see now that the bing im... commented 2026-08-10 19:31:31 UTC by Mark Brockway ♦1 |
| 186944984 (Comments: 2) | Josh007567 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, this camera installation is indeed at the placed location. It seems to be placed to identify trespassing vehicles on a private road. I can upload an image of the installation if needed commented 2026-08-10 19:27:49 UTC by Josh007567 ♦1 |
| 184894158 (Comments: 3) | Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh (Discussed changesets: 9) | Again sorry for the late response. Typically, as a personal rule, I base the boundaries off 1) the ArcGIS .kml trace (https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::national-parks/explore?location=38.896096%2C-77.028048%2C13) from USDOT , 2) parcel data, and... commented 2026-08-10 19:25:25 UTC by Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh ♦3 |
| 184929010 (Comments: 2) | Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh (Discussed changesets: 9) | I do my best to keep everything- but when a multi polygon is connected to hundreds of points and separating them is a massive pain, simply deleting them saves hours, commented 2026-08-10 19:11:24 UTC by Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh ♦3 |
| 187160769 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 36) | Please read the tags and comments commented 2026-08-10 19:07:56 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,000 |
| 187049461 (Comments: 3) | Fs00 (Discussed changesets: 1) | per esempio "Aggiornato l'Operator delle stazioni di Tamoil", che è già informativo, "Aggiornate le stazione di Tamoil" non è che spiega cos itanto.. commented 2026-08-10 19:05:19 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦208 |
| 186511242 (Comments: 2) | ssundell (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oletan, että olen sählännyt jossain valinnassa, koska merkintä on tehty saman kartan perusteella :D commented 2026-08-10 18:55:25 UTC by ssundell ♦80 |
| 187137296 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 207) | 1. 15m only means can't cross. May not mean can't walk on roadway. 2. `foot=` in the `junction=intersection` is enough commented 2026-08-10 18:54:52 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,000 |
| 187107467 (Comments: 5) | pelvis1665 (Discussed changesets: 3) | A tanya innen egyértelműnek tűnik, viszont a hrsz kereső felhoz még tanya nélküli címeket is. Ezek más címe lennének mit a tanya? commented 2026-08-10 18:46:09 UTC by vasony ♦590 |
| 187238538 (Comments: 1) | Rachel DeVries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Roads that are visible in satellite imagery should not be removed as someone will draw them again. This changeset will be reverted. commented 2026-08-10 18:34:31 UTC by gpserror ♦248 |
| 187210677 (Comments: 1) | TommyCaso (Discussed changesets: 1) | it looks like this change inadvertently moved the wilderness boundary - can you fix it? also the trail should probably be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:informal%3Dyes --- Published using OSMCha:... commented 2026-08-10 18:32:34 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦132 |
| 184419068 (Comments: 4) | cotara (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nie chodzi o render, tylko stan faktyczny. To jest droga dla rowerów, nieoznakowana. I odwrotnie, są ścieżki oznaczone znakiem C-13, które na drogę dla rowerów się nie kwalifikują. commented 2026-08-10 18:11:06 UTC by VA00 ♦651 |
| 184696592 (Comments: 6) | pyram (Discussed changesets: 60) | Bei dieser Gelegenheit habe ich gesehen, dass auch für die Rundtour 3 nun zwei Relationen für zwei Teilstücke bestehen. Die werde ich auch demnächst vereinen. commented 2026-08-10 18:10:55 UTC by gs3§zba ♦64 |
| 187229199 (Comments: 1) | bloomatree (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good, thanks for adding your business! Please reach out if you have any questions. Have a great week! commented 2026-08-10 18:08:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦404 |
| 187230323 (Comments: 1) | _Kostka_ (Discussed changesets: 19) | W tej edycji usunąłeś trzy adresy. Był do tego jakiś powód ? Te adresy a przynajmniej jeden może być ponownie przydatny w niedługim czasie. Stawiam na nr 12. Adresy można czy nawet trzeba usuwać w przypadku zdublowania,... commented 2026-08-10 18:03:32 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦687 |
| 187244048 (Comments: 1) | Yeboi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-10 18:03:15 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 186350184 (Comments: 3) | Wilmer Osario (Discussed changesets: 56) | Thank you! commented 2026-08-10 18:00:40 UTC by LakeTana ♦19 |
| 186252876 (Comments: 2) | schuepc (Discussed changesets: 3) | Merci für dein Review. Ich habe viel gelernt und werde das Anwenden in Zukunft. commented 2026-08-10 17:55:02 UTC by schuepc ♦2 |
| 186910664 (Comments: 4) | Chikengud (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, if it can be reverted cleanly. Otherwise the refs and relation would need to be removed manually. SR 42 is already tagged in old_ref=* where it belongs. (Though it should also be mapped in https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ where it *really* bel... commented 2026-08-10 17:50:46 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦650 |
| 187239504 (Comments: 2) | Daemon Targaryen (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hola, sí. Me di cuenta y estaba decidiendo si usar level o addr:floor. Terminé usando level pero ya lo he vuelto a cambiar, dejándolo con addr:floor. Saludos. commented 2026-08-10 17:44:56 UTC by Daemon Targaryen ♦20 |
| 187245143 (Comments: 2) | rle32795 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Näköjään vika olikin siinä, kun mulla ei tullut kaikkea dataa editorille ("out geom"). Pitää yrittää katsoa sitä, jos muistan. commented 2026-08-10 17:43:45 UTC by rle32795 ♦37 |
| 187232077 (Comments: 1) | Maggie962 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187239751 commented 2026-08-10 17:41:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 181310478 (Comments: 1) | Louis3000 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Det er bedst at bruge SDFI Terrain Shadow Map som hjælp, når man placerer stier i skove. Hvis man ved, at en sti eksisterer, lader det en placere den med meget større præcision. (Men det er endnu bedre, hvis man... commented 2026-08-10 17:41:07 UTC by cyclist789 ♦95 |
| 187233483 (Comments: 1) | Maggie962 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187239751 commented 2026-08-10 17:40:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 172718602 (Comments: 2) | nyanpsyche (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks for catchign that, it is a mistake commented 2026-08-10 17:25:45 UTC by nyanpsyche ♦23 |
| 185361585 (Comments: 1) | Boza22 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please make more descriptive changeset titles so it's easier for other mappers to follow what you've added/changed. Thanks for contributing! commented 2026-08-10 17:23:08 UTC by SereneDeluge ♦8 |
| 187241693 (Comments: 2) | Marbled Stargazer (Discussed changesets: 4) | I removed those names + same mistake in other changesets, while keeping the objects themselves. @Marbled%20Stargazer Here is a pointer to the OSM documentation explaining why we do not name small items like those. https://wiki.openstreetmap... commented 2026-08-10 17:18:42 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,020 |
| 183546589 (Comments: 1) | TheGPAdventurer_import (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tukaj je daljnovod in ne pot commented 2026-08-10 17:16:34 UTC by LizardMTB ♦1 |
| 185255300 (Comments: 1) | GHISLAINE NOPPER (Discussed changesets: 1) | I noticed that you added a lot of points with address data to railway sites in Alsace. All of these sites (mostly stations) are already existing in the data. So your new points are obsolete and I'd ask you to delete your new points and add the a... commented 2026-08-10 17:12:00 UTC by margin-auto ♦29 |
| 186640023 (Comments: 4) | Artur | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 81) | Zmiana nie potwierdzona w terenie. Brak znaków o jednolierunkowości, mam nagranie z kamery. Do wycofania. Yanosiki na podstawie jakiś śladów gps? wandalizują osm commented 2026-08-10 17:10:10 UTC by db-ak ♦82 |
| 187229533 (Comments: 1) | MiniLinkPedia (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ahoj, zaujima ma, odkial pochadza nazov? Kaplnky vseobecne takmer nemavaju nazov, a ked uz ano, tak takmer vzdy byva pomenovana po nejakom svatom. Mozem sa mylit, ale zatial to vyzera, ze nazvy su len vymyslene (vid https://maps.app.goo.gl/7DNC... commented 2026-08-10 17:05:59 UTC by t_ja ♦292 |
| 187024214 (Comments: 2) | ticki_52 (Discussed changesets: 200) | Because there are TWO pois with the same address and adress data belong to the plot of land/building and not to pois like companies. "covered" corrected. commented 2026-08-10 17:01:32 UTC by ticki_52 ♦138 |
| 187157278 (Comments: 2) | mancininr3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | thank you for the feedback. hopefully this round of edits is the one. commented 2026-08-10 17:00:32 UTC by mancininr3 ♦2 |
| 187237821 (Comments: 1) | Pista Motorsport (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've reverted this changeset to remove the duplications. commented 2026-08-10 16:51:43 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 187243497 (Comments: 1) | Gitasaleh Virast (Discussed changesets: 7) | اصلاح و ایجاد خط ۳۷۳ (علیآباد به خانیآباد نو) و اصلاح تهران و اتوبوسرانی تهران commented 2026-08-10 16:50:31 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦37 |
| 187236845 (Comments: 2) | Pista Motorsport (Discussed changesets: 6) | I've reverted this changeset to remove the duplications. commented 2026-08-10 16:50:01 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 187187743 (Comments: 4) | ramonz (Discussed changesets: 48) | Val, no te importancia. commented 2026-08-10 16:47:22 UTC by ramonz ♦11 |
| 183129218 (Comments: 2) | InfosReseaux (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bonjour et c'est juste, je vais le corriger. Je n'avais pas directement revu cette zone je pense. Les chemins ont été touchés par le changeset parce qu'ils on recu des attributs en plus dans la masse. C&#... commented 2026-08-10 16:43:09 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦185 |
| 187222601 (Comments: 2) | Jul88520 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Si vous voulez encore nous aider à améliorer la carte, vous pouvez regarder les problèmes détectés par Osmose, c'est un outil d'assurance qualité qui détecte des centaines de problèmes... commented 2026-08-10 16:42:32 UTC by LouisXIV ♦43 |
| 187146826 (Comments: 4) | Pista Motorsport (Discussed changesets: 6) | If you want a copy of this raceway it held in these ways:- w396423013, w396423014, w396423016, w396423007, w396423011, w396423019, w396424045, w396423009, w396424044, w396423020, w396423018, w117976650, w396425075, w396423006, w396423017, w396423012... commented 2026-08-10 16:42:17 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 170988081 (Comments: 1) | RayMo201 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello I think the tag frequency = 50;0 was correct. It means that there is also DC power with a frequency of 0 . commented 2026-08-10 16:35:54 UTC by marvin3 ♦19 |
| 186666507 (Comments: 2) | StLo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo StLo, könntest du das bitte erklären? Vielleicht ist dir ja ein Fehler unterlaufen. Als Neuling bei OSM kann das passieren. War bei mir bestimmt auch nicht anders. Übrigens: Streetcomplete fragt manchmal Dinge, die nicht z... commented 2026-08-10 16:22:15 UTC by uvi ♦149 |
| 181330453 (Comments: 2) | LVaz99 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I've manually undone the change made here; I've driven through here, there's no change in speed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187241935 commented 2026-08-10 16:20:04 UTC by hoserab ♦249 |
| 187240056 (Comments: 1) | sscobie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi sscobie, I've left a comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187239124. As far as I know there's still a separate, dedicated left turn lane here, so I don't know why you've deleted it. I've also sent you a direc... commented 2026-08-10 16:15:20 UTC by hoserab ♦249 |
| 184194555 (Comments: 2) | PluMGMK (Discussed changesets: 27) | You mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13946048816? You're welcome! :) commented 2026-08-10 16:11:25 UTC by PluMGMK ♦24 |
| 187232816 (Comments: 1) | GiuliaGalliAmbrosi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Benvenuta Giulia nella comunità di OpenStreetMap. La modifica che hai fatto è una prova? Scrivendo solo "ok" nel commento non si capisce, l'area boschiva inserita è un po' troppo approssimata, in quella zon... commented 2026-08-10 16:10:32 UTC by arcanma ♦237 |
| 187076916 (Comments: 4) | NamibDesert (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for your response Happy mapping commented 2026-08-10 16:08:00 UTC by BerryTrails ♦21 |
| 187148859 (Comments: 3) | Sisores (Discussed changesets: 6) | Alles was jetzt drin ist, ist entweder geschottert oder so ausgefahren, dass es als Weg erkennbar ist (und sich höchstwahrscheinlich nicht ändert, weil man nicht einfach woanders die Hecke platt fährt). Auffahrten sind diese kurzen St&... commented 2026-08-10 16:05:34 UTC by Sisores ♦4 |
| 182132280 (Comments: 1) | Dmitriy Nikonov (Discussed changesets: 3) | שלום https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137774316 זה בית כנסת או מקלט או גם וגם? התיוג לא ברור commented 2026-08-10 16:01:57 UTC by hatul ♦504 |
| 187171463 (Comments: 3) | 5mister7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey 5mister7 This should be classified as trunk only because, as of now, it is acting as the main segment due to the temporary deviation. It may potentially function as a link in the future, but currently, it is diverting traffic and serving the m... commented 2026-08-10 16:01:28 UTC by BerryTrails ♦21 |
| 187234662 (Comments: 2) | Maggie962 (Discussed changesets: 3) | revert aller Einträge von user:Maggie962, unsachgemäße SEO-Einträge, fehlende Tags, falsche Öffnungszeiten-Syntax, überschreiben bestehender Adressknoten und Hausumringe. Die Spur führt zu https://riegel-it.de/ ... commented 2026-08-10 16:00:29 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,453 |
| 183451447 (Comments: 1) | storti d (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao, ma sei sicuro* che il bar sia aperto? a me sembra un esercizio commerciale vacante, a differenza di uno o due anni fa, perché ogni volta che passo qui davanti è chiuso, credo in via definitiva. commented 2026-08-10 15:54:23 UTC by Una tantum ♦32 |
| 187162254 (Comments: 3) | Patchi (Discussed changesets: 39) | Due to the change of the GTFS feeds from Zou all GTFS informations in the Zou network has to be updated. Therefore for the lines I try to maintain, I choose the "new GTFS scheme" as gtfs:feed is now deprecated (see https://wiki.openstreetma... commented 2026-08-10 15:53:19 UTC by Patchi ♦149 |
| 184649926 (Comments: 3) | James_Griffiths (Discussed changesets: 11) | No problem, I just wanted to make sure it wasn’t intentional. No worries (: commented 2026-08-10 15:50:48 UTC by Vi2727 ♦9 |
| 186527027 (Comments: 3) | Oscarfranky (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's truly amazing to have such easy access to that data set. Happy mapping! commented 2026-08-10 15:47:13 UTC by A Hall ♦62 |
| 187114818 (Comments: 2) | d7eame (Discussed changesets: 3) | وجزاكم commented 2026-08-10 15:46:48 UTC by d7eame ♦1 |
| 187232226 (Comments: 1) | LegrandJ (Discussed changesets: 48) | Bonjour, Il y a sûrement une bonne intention derrière ce changement, mais ceci est pour signaler que ça a de nouveau cassé la structure des relations bus ici. Le but n'est pas uniquement que ça soit joli ... commented 2026-08-10 15:42:06 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,020 |
| 187239124 (Comments: 1) | sscobie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Does Barlow not still have left turn bays here, with their own dedicated traffic signals, separated by concrete islands from the through traffic lanes? commented 2026-08-10 15:40:51 UTC by hoserab ♦249 |
| 187188364 (Comments: 6) | TG-map4 (Discussed changesets: 14) | We dont - At the OSM Konferenz in Goettingen mostly TomTom spoke up and i think they do have QA Pipelines - but how often do you update data in Your car or Mobile Navi (If you had one) Sometimes people only do it yearly. So we need to ... commented 2026-08-10 15:28:46 UTC by flohoff ♦2,541 |
| 187144205 (Comments: 4) | RDCLgroup Uruguay (Discussed changesets: 2) | No hay problema ni necesidad de disculpas. Gracias a ti por los aportes. Hay que tener ojo con los datos de los postes kilometricos del MTOP, no siempre estan bien (o mejor dicho no estaban con la calidad que se estila en OSM cuando pretend&ia... commented 2026-08-10 15:24:53 UTC by muralito ♦2,173 |
| 187237349 (Comments: 1) | LegrandJ (Discussed changesets: 48) | Bonjour, Retirer les arrêts https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3836403754 des relations mais en laissant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11537991759 avec role=stop dans les relations n'est pas une bonne correction, ça cr&e... commented 2026-08-10 15:15:24 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,020 |
| 186487817 (Comments: 1) | Abdullah500 (Discussed changesets: 1) | شكرا جزيلا لك commented 2026-08-10 15:13:40 UTC by Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦762 |
| 187237779 (Comments: 1) | matteobin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Doppio senso di Via Donizetti commented 2026-08-10 15:13:25 UTC by matteobin ♦3 |
| 187214582 (Comments: 2) | bo0tzz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ja goed punt 😁 Hij stelde 'm voor en ik klikte erop zonder al te veel na te denken. commented 2026-08-10 15:12:09 UTC by bo0tzz ♦1 |
| 186334368 (Comments: 1) | P-E_LRX (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, that's very interesting - your new post about this protected area: do you have any more information (name, source, website)? commented 2026-08-10 15:04:47 UTC by Kari59bib ♦3 |
| 180256804 (Comments: 3) | mercedon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moon @Negreheb Der Golfplatz ist Geschichte. Das Gelände ist nun für viele Jahre an die Betreiber vom Drachenfest verpachtet. Daher ist schon möglich, dass die neuen Wege recht langlebig sind. Müssen halt entweder vom aktuellen... commented 2026-08-10 15:03:54 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,226 |
| 187237449 (Comments: 1) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi rskedgell , I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback. I have aligned the fenced boundary properly. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. Thank you. Rahil Pasha commented 2026-08-10 15:02:45 UTC by RahilPasha ♦20 |
| 178548469 (Comments: 2) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 35) | Finalement je l’ai supprimé. commented 2026-08-10 15:02:10 UTC by Bauxite ♦10 |
| 187222274 (Comments: 4) | bobbert123 (Discussed changesets: 21) | 😄 commented 2026-08-10 14:56:16 UTC by bobbert123 ♦19 |
| 187236618 (Comments: 1) | OSM078 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi.. Dit lijkt me allemaal oke. Mapse, eggie commented 2026-08-10 14:51:36 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187230199 (Comments: 1) | Maurict (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM.. I merged your info with the present addressnode. Greetz, eggie commented 2026-08-10 14:50:22 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187230715 (Comments: 1) | Oliver Farník (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zdravím, tady je zákaz vjezdu na koni? commented 2026-08-10 14:42:55 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
| 187232449 (Comments: 1) | Nibub (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-10 14:42:15 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187173651 (Comments: 2) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Het fietspad heeft geen verbindingen met de opritten. Het fietspad over de brug ligt er nu nog steeds in OSM. commented 2026-08-10 14:38:14 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 186638818 (Comments: 3) | stragu (Discussed changesets: 14) | I agree the wiki is quite confusing if you need to choose between a lowered or flush kerb. The wiki photos for kerb=flush are really zoomed in, and (in my opinion) makes it seem like its purely around how smooth the transition is, and whether a wheel... commented 2026-08-10 14:37:14 UTC by Joel Koen ♦42 |
| 184962554 (Comments: 1) | Laurent Grégoire (Discussed changesets: 3) | highway=footway and foot=designated seems unlikely since the rest of the greenway appears to be highway=cycleway and foot=yes (not designated). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18... commented 2026-08-10 14:35:52 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,512 |
| 186991308 (Comments: 2) | thecockmaster (Discussed changesets: 1) | Köszönöm az észrevételt! Javítottam. commented 2026-08-10 14:28:27 UTC by thecockmaster ♦1 |
| 187054708 (Comments: 2) | Sylvain Lesage (Discussed changesets: 4) | jaja. Para Mapillary, no me gusta que ya pertenezca a Facebook/Meta. En el pasado había contribuido un poco, pero ya no quiero. En Francia, se prefiere la alternativa abierta Panoramax (https://panoramax.fr/). No se si probaste. commented 2026-08-10 14:26:59 UTC by Sylvain Lesage ♦3 |
| 180734324 (Comments: 4) | DaveF (Discussed changesets: 178) | There's no point in having an accurate map if information can't be viewed. There's nothing wrong in positioning a label to help make it clear. Clarity is a part of being accurate, obfuscation makes for inaccuracies. I move ... commented 2026-08-10 14:24:46 UTC by DaveF ♦1,679 |
| 184318620 (Comments: 2) | Atrotters (Discussed changesets: 5) | jak to jest na etapie wariantów to raczej za wcześnie na mapowanie commented 2026-08-10 14:22:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 186774581 (Comments: 2) | Atrotters (Discussed changesets: 5) | a, DW to niekoniecznie highway=secondary commented 2026-08-10 14:21:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 186960569 (Comments: 2) | xProtonius (Discussed changesets: 3) | This deletion appears to be part of a systematic vandalism pattern involving sockpuppet accounts (including aledeavilapaglia, xProtonius, Fernando Aragon, and Munzamil). Switching accounts to bypass community revert and force an edit war is ag... commented 2026-08-10 14:20:13 UTC by 橘ヒカリ ♦71 |
| 185231376 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 54) | seems more like description=* than name=* --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185231376 commented 2026-08-10 14:16:59 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,512 |
| 187206408 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187234918 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 115) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 186956306, 186956318, 186956329, 187145926, 187145949, 187145962, 187146005, 187146023, 187146042, 187146093, 187146100, 187146108, 187146137, 187146145, 187146155, 187206293, 187206296, 187... commented 2026-08-10 14:16:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208756 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213568 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213495 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206316 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213650 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206326 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213346 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213713 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213683 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213419 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208685 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206393 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206309 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213842 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213399 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213439 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208746 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206413 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208688 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213823 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208601 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206389 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208675 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208731 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213801 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208792 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213667 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208623 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206305 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213875 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213564 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213622 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208780 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213590 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213578 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213386 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213670 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206342 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206388 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213868 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213764 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206397 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213363 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208739 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208665 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213508 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208693 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213830 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213745 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213607 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146100 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213501 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:15 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208787 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213641 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213677 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208764 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:14 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206399 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213341 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208751 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187145949 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:13 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206422 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213791 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206338 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213531 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208709 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:12 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213602 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208670 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213550 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213469 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213776 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206303 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208643 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146155 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:10 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187145962 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208698 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:09 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213661 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213616 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213354 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213452 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146137 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:08 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206296 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 186956306 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206392 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206331 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208574 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208597 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:07 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146042 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146005 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213806 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146023 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206347 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146145 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213521 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:06 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208736 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206334 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213693 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213409 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 186956329 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213379 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208618 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208702 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:05 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213465 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213756 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213543 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208589 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 186956318 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213703 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:04 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208769 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213427 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208582 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208667 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213856 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208759 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:03 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213731 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206411 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146108 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206343 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:02 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208579 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208555 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213815 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187146093 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187145926 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208565 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206293 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213445 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206403 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187208611 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187213436 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:16:00 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187206300 (Comments: 1) | DeFlockerBlocker2026 (Discussed changesets: 130) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 187234918 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional flock camera vandalism commented 2026-08-10 14:15:59 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,869 |
| 187215141 (Comments: 1) | Molker (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi! I accidentally modified some paths that haven't been opened yet. The online revert tool keeps failing due to server overload. Could someone please revert changesets 187219756, 187219496, 187215249, 187215141, 187215064 for me? Thanks a lot! commented 2026-08-10 14:09:10 UTC by Molker ♦28 |
| 187215249 (Comments: 1) | Molker (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi! I accidentally modified some paths that haven't been opened yet. The online revert tool keeps failing due to server overload. Could someone please revert changesets 187219756, 187219496, 187215249, 187215141, 187215064 for me? Thanks a lot! commented 2026-08-10 14:09:04 UTC by Molker ♦28 |
| 187219496 (Comments: 1) | Molker (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi! I accidentally modified some paths that haven't been opened yet. The online revert tool keeps failing due to server overload. Could someone please revert changesets 187219756, 187219496, 187215249, 187215141, 187215064 for me? Thanks a lot! commented 2026-08-10 14:08:58 UTC by Molker ♦28 |
| 187219756 (Comments: 1) | Molker (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi! I accidentally modified some paths that haven't been opened yet. The online revert tool keeps failing due to server overload. Could someone please revert changesets 187219756, 187219496, 187215249, 187215141, 187215064 for me? Thanks a lot! commented 2026-08-10 14:08:50 UTC by Molker ♦28 |
| 187215064 (Comments: 3) | Molker (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi! I accidentally modified some paths that haven't been opened yet. The online revert tool keeps failing due to server overload. Could someone please revert changesets 187219756, 187219496, 187215249, 187215141, 187215064 for me? Thanks a lot! commented 2026-08-10 14:08:33 UTC by Molker ♦28 |
| 123580625 (Comments: 1) | mercedon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Servus, A - gehört das vermutlich inzwicshen gelöscht weil wo anders und B - vermutlich gehört das eigentlich gar nicht in OSM rein, oder? commented 2026-08-10 14:07:10 UTC by Negreheb ♦369 |
| 4358919 (Comments: 2) | Yarl (Discussed changesets: 12) | Jest to po prostu skrót nazwy czy oficjalnie nadany kod? commented 2026-08-10 14:04:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187161225 (Comments: 2) | Userinexile (Discussed changesets: 10) | 我不知道是否有相关的政策或指引，如果有还请提供下 叠在一起的way通常可以通过拆分解决，node通过断开节点解决 commented 2026-08-10 14:03:42 UTC by Userinexile ♦11 |
| 180620457 (Comments: 1) | fukejs (Discussed changesets: 16) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1113133/history/6 has another value in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:route . I was trying to find a good sample. commented 2026-08-10 14:02:19 UTC by 9_tab ♦111 |
| 187214780 (Comments: 1) | sccuca (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey! Was this re-added? Last I checked (~2 weeks ago) this camera was still removed. commented 2026-08-10 13:59:06 UTC by iandees ♦1,398 |
| 187232625 (Comments: 1) | neox11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Iets verplaatst conform BGT... Let op dat de taggingtaal Engels is. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-10 13:56:43 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187223678 (Comments: 1) | Orto1964 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Бл. 261 е до сградата commented 2026-08-10 13:56:06 UTC by Anonymous36863 ♦50 |
| 187232491 (Comments: 2) | neox11 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Aangepast... Ook de positie. Je kunt de BGT als achtergrond gebruiken. Daar staat alles ingemeten ingetekend. commented 2026-08-10 13:55:00 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187228237 (Comments: 1) | Velvory Fashion & Living (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. Evt website=.. toevoegen is ook een mogelijkheid. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-10 13:47:03 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187057535 (Comments: 1) | igorekpotworek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Częściowo wycofane: https://osm.org/changeset/187228372 commented 2026-08-10 13:37:19 UTC by Fan map 2 ♦25 |
| 185747343 (Comments: 1) | Onur Çetin (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dear Onür Please be carefull using the tag junction=roundabout. This tag implies the traffic on the roundabout has right of way, which is not usually the case in Turkey. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout?uselang=en<... commented 2026-08-10 13:34:41 UTC by de24000 ♦9 |
| 187195019 (Comments: 5) | pelvis1665 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Rendben, köszi! A fixme-kkel az a baj, hogy csak gyűlnek-gyűlnek, és sokan nem veszik észre szerkesztés közben. Igazából az ország nagy részére lehetne tenni fixme-t mert mindig van ... commented 2026-08-10 13:25:06 UTC by qstep ♦163 |
| 187145543 (Comments: 3) | RyanBush (Discussed changesets: 21) | Thank you for the quick reply and helpful explanation. It's a good idea to mention things like this when closing notes. The single word "Updated" communicates little. Ideally, refer to any relevant changesets. commented 2026-08-10 13:23:44 UTC by tomhukins ♦295 |
| 187216397 (Comments: 1) | mehdib64 (Discussed changesets: 1) | what dose P1.1 of RCRC mean? + the UTurn has been removed please check multiple aerial imagery before adding bing is quite outdated i recommend esri in Saudi Arabia and in some places mapbox is newer commented 2026-08-10 13:21:09 UTC by Alshowaiey ♦31 |
| 140562137 (Comments: 2) | VicWM (Discussed changesets: 6) | Nice Spot yevs - I would probably add a note or set the road directly. There is no way I would put a 2wd up there and there would be the odd gate no doubt. I think setting the easstern section up to the chicane as is, the chicane to where the drivewa... commented 2026-08-10 13:12:11 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦504 |
| 122571714 (Comments: 1) | Goniometer (Discussed changesets: 5) | You can't just put the english name of a bay into name=*, Croatian is the official language here. commented 2026-08-10 12:57:19 UTC by Janjko ♦89 |
| 182890775 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hi EveryStreetDuval, My name is Lalit, and I am a mapper on the OpenStreetMap team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and for taking the time to point out the mistake. You are absolutely right that, rather than removing the a... commented 2026-08-10 12:54:53 UTC by Lkumar_lyft ♦8 |
| 187177853 (Comments: 2) | goldfndr (Discussed changesets: 50) | Updated guy tagging in the https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187229777 changeset. commented 2026-08-10 12:53:17 UTC by goldfndr ♦69 |
| 187195617 (Comments: 4) | blinmaster (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ahh..die editor iD vertaalt het Nederlandse voorstel naar het Engels. Dus inderdaad shelter. Ik gebruik editor josm. commented 2026-08-10 12:44:20 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187209188 (Comments: 1) | ReliefMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping You often include the shadow of a building in the mapping. (black spot) Please don't do that. I see that you are rather new in the mapping world. Please strengthen your mapping skills Check this website<... commented 2026-08-10 12:39:27 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187208538 (Comments: 3) | elgaspi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Transformaste toda la población en una cancha. Por favor cuidado con este tipo de ediciones. En OSM se mapea la realidad en terreno. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.o... commented 2026-08-10 12:38:54 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187111739 (Comments: 1) | Roman Hashrudin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Looks like you created three duplicates of the same peak. I've kept the one on the tallest part of the hill according to contour lines, and deleted the other two. commented 2026-08-10 12:38:03 UTC by Oskarst_ ♦92 |
| 186495370 (Comments: 2) | ReliefMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi. You made it a habit to stop mapping paths etc just before settlements. and you often forgot to connect nodes of highway to each other where they crosses . !! Please be sure to connect them, You cause a lot of additional work for other ma... commented 2026-08-10 12:32:45 UTC by Frans S ♦10,890 |
| 187228483 (Comments: 1) | Piskvor (Discussed changesets: 79) | *Myslbekova. Myslitelé všude :D commented 2026-08-10 12:24:09 UTC by Piskvor ♦501 |
 | 187124661 (Comments: 1) | rild leka (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, you are right that the relations are not administrative regions. However, they have been reinstated with the administrative tags removed (to accommodate the reason for this changeset), since they are valid NUTS statistical regions. <... commented 2026-08-10 12:17:00 UTC by ika-chan! ♦424 |
| 186693133 (Comments: 6) | Hadi Omid (Discussed changesets: 3) | فکر نمیکنم، این دوربرگردان تازه باز شده احتمالا برای مراسم افتتاح موقت بسته شده بوده commented 2026-08-10 12:12:13 UTC by Hadi Omid ♦55 |
| 187227416 (Comments: 1) | HoeksBest (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi, Wabnneer het echt een wandelpad is .. footway hoef je niet toe te voegen motor_vehicle, bicycle en horse=no Dat is default. Ik heb het pad losgemaakt van de landusevlakken. MVG eggie commented 2026-08-10 12:12:00 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187227911 (Comments: 1) | ika-chan! (Discussed changesets: 116) | Partial revert or modification of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187124661 (they are valid NUTS regions and can be mapped as such). commented 2026-08-10 12:11:35 UTC by ika-chan! ♦424 |
| 187226782 (Comments: 1) | 09pry4d92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-10 12:07:38 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 184927324 (Comments: 2) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hi ntzm, Thank you for reverting the changeset and for your feedback mentioning the newer Mapillary imagery. At the time of my edit I wasn't able to find recent Mapillary imagery covering this road segment, so the edit was made based on o... commented 2026-08-10 12:03:25 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 184366236 (Comments: 2) | jacceber (Discussed changesets: 4) | The footpaths coming into the area with no defined path, ie, pedestrians (students) travel across the space to get to their destination. The wiki defines pedestrian areas are in recreation and civic areas. I viewed it as a multi-use ... commented 2026-08-10 12:00:48 UTC by jacceber ♦2 |
| 175238884 (Comments: 2) | Rong2323 (Discussed changesets: 2) | if it is POI - what kind of object it is? commented 2026-08-10 12:00:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 128462143 (Comments: 1) | Laxmi oli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10155895372/history has amenity = building that was added in this edit amenity=building ? What it is supposed to mean? Why not use standard building= (and only building=) commented 2026-08-10 11:58:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187225968 (Comments: 1) | geochepy (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hola. Estás agrupando casas distintas bajó un solo polígono. En algunos casos están poniendo bajo el polígono el predio completo. Estas ediciones tendrán que ser corregidas. por favor darse el tiempo d... commented 2026-08-10 11:58:25 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦3,295 |
| 187161738 (Comments: 1) | Jaenic10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187226950 commented 2026-08-10 11:51:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 182789325 (Comments: 2) | Tim Grose (Discussed changesets: 2) | Noted about removed stuff. There has been a huge amount of change in the last year of two due to the M25/A3 junction improvement works. I have been mapping the new bits and removed some of the old. I thought the original location was useful at least ... commented 2026-08-10 11:50:36 UTC by Tim Grose ♦13 |
| 187226522 (Comments: 1) | rachel_norfolk (Discussed changesets: 1) | see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5447464 commented 2026-08-10 11:47:17 UTC by rachel_norfolk ♦1 |
| 187223224 (Comments: 2) | Jan Online (Discussed changesets: 16) | In case you are not familiar with phone numbers in Belgium, here are some hints. Businesses often write down phone numbers in the traditional style (which worked well on old wired phones, and which also works on mobile phones if people are in ... commented 2026-08-10 11:45:29 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,020 |
| 177223630 (Comments: 6) | BAT_SBB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ich habe das Perron mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187226349 als "im Bau" erfasst. commented 2026-08-10 11:39:50 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
 | 187209482 (Comments: 1) | maksovskij_348 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello maksovskij_348, Thanks for adding street names. Please use the correct form for English numerals (not 2-nd, but 2nd, etc.) commented 2026-08-10 11:39:24 UTC by empty_child ♦405 |
| 187225804 (Comments: 1) | matteobin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Aggiunge i civici in via Donnizetti, cambia il tipo di strada e aggiunge il parcheggio commented 2026-08-10 11:34:00 UTC by matteobin ♦3 |
| 183999806 (Comments: 3) | gs3§zba (Discussed changesets: 17) | Ich habe es nun wieder zurück geändert. commented 2026-08-10 11:31:14 UTC by santon ♦46 |
| 187225300 (Comments: 1) | flo1212 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Die bisherige Klassifizierung als highway=service ist zwar laut Verkehrsbeschilderung technisch gesehen in Ordnung, beschreibt aber nicht den primären Verwendungszweck. Dieser ist eine Radstraße, auf dem Autoverkehr zu Zufahrtszwecken gedu... commented 2026-08-10 11:25:40 UTC by flo1212 ♦1 |
| 186198820 (Comments: 5) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Me too! commented 2026-08-10 11:23:51 UTC by rhhs ♦233 |
| 187220879 (Comments: 4) | Wytze2 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Dat valt ook nauwelijks te zien, ik zou het ook niet gezien hebben, maar knooppuntnet zag het wel en melde een routerelatie zonder wegen. Van 31-35 waren alleen nog de knooppunten in de routerelatie over gebleven en dat valt zo niet op. Dan moet j... commented 2026-08-10 11:17:27 UTC by dvdhoven ♦976 |
| 181124121 (Comments: 2) | Vandana@28 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, rskedgell I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback and the corrections. Thank you. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. Thanks and Regards, Vandana N commented 2026-08-10 11:11:50 UTC by Vandana@28 ♦15 |
| 180012656 (Comments: 5) | Vandana@28 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, rskedgell I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback and the corrections. Thank you. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. Thanks and Regards, Vandana N commented 2026-08-10 11:10:03 UTC by Vandana@28 ♦15 |
| 187201690 (Comments: 1) | Haiti postal digital (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187224605 commented 2026-08-10 11:04:44 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187172534 (Comments: 1) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 126) | Hi rskedgell, I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback and the corrections. Thank you. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. Thanks and regards Uvasree Dhamodharan commented 2026-08-10 11:04:18 UTC by Uvasree ♦1 |
| 182869369 (Comments: 2) | sv bhavya (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi rskedgell, I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback and the corrections. Thank you. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. Thanks and regards Bhavya sv commented 2026-08-10 11:01:14 UTC by sv bhavya ♦1 |
| 187115317 (Comments: 1) | Sisikottos (Discussed changesets: 3) | please make smaller changeset commented 2026-08-10 10:57:12 UTC by GiovanniPen ♦31 |
| 187164257 (Comments: 1) | HOSHIYAR SINGH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187224209 commented 2026-08-10 10:57:06 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 186921803 (Comments: 5) | jkorf (Discussed changesets: 18) | No problem.. staat er weer. Gr eggie commented 2026-08-10 10:48:03 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 174844266 (Comments: 2) | ompatekar (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thank you for pointing this out. You’re right—when moving the previous name to alt_name, the corresponding name:* tags should also be moved to alt_name:*. I’ll make sure to verify more carefully next time. Appreciate your suggestion... commented 2026-08-10 10:41:01 UTC by ompatekar ♦8 |
| 186008261 (Comments: 1) | WIBSS Informtik (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für die Verbesserung. Ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187223383 noch den verbleibenden Namen auf dem Gebäude entfernt, sowie auch den `note`-Wert. Dieser ist für "Notizen" für andere Mappe... commented 2026-08-10 10:40:56 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 187168427 (Comments: 1) | Marcus Whitfield (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187223266 commented 2026-08-10 10:37:34 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 187222760 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 423) | wrong comment: correct opening_hours commented 2026-08-10 10:28:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,771 |
| 187220708 (Comments: 1) | tim_vdh (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ik heb die verwijderde stukken fietspad Op den Heuvel weer terug gelegd. Ze stonden op construction en er lagen heel veel fiets- en wandelroutes op, waarvan het duidelijk moet zijn of ze omgelegd moeten worden of niet. En zo blijven de routes heel... commented 2026-08-10 10:28:20 UTC by dvdhoven ♦976 |
| 187222750 (Comments: 1) | matteobin (Discussed changesets: 3) | Rinonima Via del T in Via del Tau commented 2026-08-10 10:28:12 UTC by matteobin ♦3 |
| 187222753 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 423) | wrong comment: correct opening_hours commented 2026-08-10 10:26:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,771 |
| 187192842 (Comments: 4) | PrUsT2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Grazie dell'informazione, non lo sapevo. commented 2026-08-10 10:23:08 UTC by PrUsT2 ♦2 |
| 185942554 (Comments: 2) | Per Starke – KSWD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da keinen Antwort von dir kam, habe ich das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187222476 erledigt. commented 2026-08-10 10:19:52 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 184436306 (Comments: 1) | even666 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Even666, du hast schon wieder die Umrisse des Friedhofs verändert. Dabei hast du auch die Umrisse des Parkplatzes falsch verändert und nicht-existente Wege zum gedenkstein eingetragen. Bitte erkläre was dich dazu bewegt, immer wieder d... commented 2026-08-10 10:13:54 UTC by Edelsalami ♦134 |
| 187219892 (Comments: 8) | NNNSSS (Discussed changesets: 1) | tunnel=building_passage and covered=yes are tags for a line-element. Not for the roofs. commented 2026-08-10 10:13:00 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 128098325 (Comments: 3) | RREF72 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao Sabato sono andato a fare un giro. In effetti la passeggiata è chiusa, ho mappato la recizione così è più chiara la situazione. Resta da vedere dal lato di Via San Felice se è percorribile Ciao e buon... commented 2026-08-10 10:10:11 UTC by Jacopo ♦44 |
| 186724072 (Comments: 1) | izolight (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your efforts！ commented 2026-08-10 10:07:58 UTC by Jonathan Ng@ ♦17 |
| 187204259 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 80) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14084531031. What is the mean of the tag boba = yes? commented 2026-08-10 10:07:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,771 |
| 186938789 (Comments: 2) | DigitalDigger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oui je suis sûr, c'est pas des trucs très sophistiqués, c'est genre des barres de traction assez basses commented 2026-08-10 10:06:38 UTC by DigitalDigger ♦1 |
| 187115212 (Comments: 3) | whitepanda (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi silversurfer83, Thank you for your feedback and for raising the question. There was a traffic_calming=yes tag on the footway instead of the highway segment. I understand that you would like me provide a specific calming feature instead of the g... commented 2026-08-10 10:03:57 UTC by whitepanda ♦41 |
| 187192552 (Comments: 1) | Dvorný (Discussed changesets: 24) | #reperfectit commented 2026-08-10 10:03:10 UTC by Dvorný ♦42 |
| 187201129 (Comments: 1) | Dvorný (Discussed changesets: 24) | #reperfectit commented 2026-08-10 10:02:57 UTC by Dvorný ♦42 |
| 187221036 (Comments: 1) | Dvorný (Discussed changesets: 24) | #reperfectit commented 2026-08-10 10:01:43 UTC by Dvorný ♦42 |
| 187000944 (Comments: 5) | Adze1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thanks for going back and checking, and for all the other details added nearby! commented 2026-08-10 09:57:28 UTC by lakedistrict ♦333 |
| 175402072 (Comments: 2) | Robot8A (Discussed changesets: 81) | Fixed commented 2026-08-10 09:48:30 UTC by Robot8A ♦89 |
| 78991272 (Comments: 1) | RudolpheDeer (Discussed changesets: 16) | Schouppe heeft van uw begraafplaats een building gemaakt. Over de militaire begraafplaats was hij duidelijk verkeerd. Maar wat met deze kleine area ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759452295#map=19/51.234801/2.977377&layers=D http... commented 2026-08-10 09:48:06 UTC by philippec ♦758 |
| 187220478 (Comments: 1) | Gijs18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback Lijkt me oke.. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2026-08-10 09:45:27 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187219914 (Comments: 1) | gtfs2osm-il (Discussed changesets: 11) | Accidentally ran an older version of the script, causing unintended note:name edits. Fixed now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187220855 commented 2026-08-10 09:45:23 UTC by NeatNit ♦85 |
| 187086460 (Comments: 2) | BeartoothMountains (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello soliMM, Apple has an agreement with Vantor to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use... commented 2026-08-10 09:45:11 UTC by BeartoothMountains ♦2 |
| 187218682 (Comments: 1) | Milton Park Mapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for adding this. For a vegan restaurant, you almost certainly want diet:vegan=only rather than diet:vegan=yes commented 2026-08-10 09:41:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,896 |
| 187214492 (Comments: 3) | duxxa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ich hätt auch das alte als abgebrochen hinterlegen können und das neue neu einzeichnen können, wär auch kein Fehler gewesen. Danke dir! :) commented 2026-08-10 09:34:26 UTC by Negreheb ♦369 |
| 187165382 (Comments: 1) | ChonkerStonker (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hello ChonkerStonker, I noticed that R4246124 is not available in Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=4246124 Could you please double check your recent changes to understand if somet... commented 2026-08-10 09:34:12 UTC by vricciardulli ♦40 |
| 183935874 (Comments: 1) | even666 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Even666, du hast SCHON WIEDER die Grenzen des Naturschutzgebiets falsch verändert. Deine Änderungen sind FALSCH. Welchen Teil von "Lass die Finger von NSG-Umrissen" verstehst du nicht? commented 2026-08-10 09:33:41 UTC by Edelsalami ♦134 |
| 185732124 (Comments: 1) | xrt (Discussed changesets: 62) | Hi, about this guidepost: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14015135164 There are already many direction_north:symbol and even direction_north:osmc:symbol I guess this could be the better key here. commented 2026-08-10 09:33:17 UTC by mueschel ♦7,274 |
| 187201587 (Comments: 1) | Haiti postal digital (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187220153 commented 2026-08-10 09:31:02 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 139724780 (Comments: 1) | TagaSanPedroAko (Discussed changesets: 334) | Hello, this changeset broke several borders with a self intersection: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11037664#map=19/14.579542/121.017143 Affected relations are relation/11037664, relation/103703 and relation/16863356 Can you... commented 2026-08-10 09:13:01 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦74 |
| 187216453 (Comments: 1) | adlay16 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ketika membuat jalan, harap tidak menabrak bangunan commented 2026-08-10 09:12:23 UTC by FajrAl ♦658 |
| 187218567 (Comments: 1) | iisacc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome. Just a heads up that we can not use Google and see that you haven't. This is due to licensing. Really nice work there. Just a heads up that you don't need to add the postcode and Suburb into addr... commented 2026-08-10 09:11:27 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦504 |
| 187200567 (Comments: 1) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rajdhani commented 2026-08-10 09:06:32 UTC by rajdhani ♦319 |
| 86035681 (Comments: 2) | wajak (Discussed changesets: 9) | Nie mam pojęcia czy istnieje w tym miejscu Ale ogółem od kilku lat istnieje: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droga_2-1 Sam widziałem w jednym miejscu w Polsce na żywo commented 2026-08-10 09:04:45 UTC by dzamper ♦271 |
| 184349079 (Comments: 1) | RA0101 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, du hast hier 2 Pfade gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577647276 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354218404 - warum? commented 2026-08-10 09:00:55 UTC by PPete2 ♦173 |
| 186999348 (Comments: 2) | schuepc (Discussed changesets: 3) | Swimming pools in Privatgärten wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1547546403 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1547546402 sollten mit den entsprechenden `access`-Werten versehen werden, hier `access=private`. Ich habe das in https://ww... commented 2026-08-10 09:00:24 UTC by habi ♦2,222 |
| 187129136 (Comments: 1) | dani0x17 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Key in value (opening_hours) aangepast. Daarnaast syntax opening_hours gewijzigd (gelijk resultaat). source tag verwijderd gaf 404-error. P.S. Facebook en Google laten andere sluitingstijden zien (Wel gelijk aan elkaar). Is het mogelijk... commented 2026-08-10 08:59:48 UTC by Kees 59 ♦103 |
| 185732534 (Comments: 1) | meidam (Discussed changesets: 1) | please be careful not to move node of ways while editing commented 2026-08-10 08:56:54 UTC by Elhamn1992 ♦2 |
| 178569907 (Comments: 1) | SedemOSM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Sedem, Welcome to OSM and thanks for mapping. Kindly use Title case for names instead of ALL CAPS. i.e "Rev. Dr. SS. Agidi Memorial School" instead of "Rev. Dr. SS. AGIDI MEMORIAL SCHOOL" name=Classroom block is a descri... commented 2026-08-10 08:55:08 UTC by Enock4seth ♦657 |
| 183347580 (Comments: 1) | yacine01234 (Discussed changesets: 4) | La boucherie était déjà renseignée. Pourquoi l’avoir dupliquée ? commented 2026-08-10 08:51:30 UTC by Lejun ♦526 |
| 187161640 (Comments: 1) | Jaenic10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187218217 commented 2026-08-10 08:49:05 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 187175010 (Comments: 3) | Kaloan-koko (Discussed changesets: 69) | С https://revert.monicz.dev/, но в случая е по-лесно ръчно. changeset/187217864 commented 2026-08-10 08:40:54 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦1,011 |
| 187217461 (Comments: 1) | Fraxi (Discussed changesets: 178) | Ако на някой не му харесва, да си я оправи. Можеше много лесно по кадастър да заменя геометрията и готово. commented 2026-08-10 08:38:53 UTC by Fraxi ♦482 |
| 187200273 (Comments: 3) | Appie Neef (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ahhh .. oke... kennelijk als je > gebruikt is het weight. Verwarrend... Groet, eggie commented 2026-08-10 08:38:21 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187215963 (Comments: 4) | GuusG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hier had je de Zomerven verplaatst richting Provincialeweg en de Kuilvenweg ook verplaatst net als een boeren veldweg. commented 2026-08-10 08:24:24 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 149471041 (Comments: 3) | Arrutic (Discussed changesets: 5) | And thanks for edit and fix! And other edits you make! commented 2026-08-10 08:22:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 187215385 (Comments: 3) | GuusG (Discussed changesets: 2) | De MTB route had je helemaal verplaatst naar de Weg door Rijpel. Daarbij heb je ook het fietspad meegenomen. Welke weg zou dat surface=gravel moeten krijgen? Je zou ook smootness=??? bad kunnen taggen. Het fietspad staat nu op tracktype=... commented 2026-08-10 08:21:00 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187110681 (Comments: 1) | JohnnyDoes (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello JohnnyDoes, Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Could you please share the sources for the updates you've made in this location? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way1548004958 https://pewu.github.io/... commented 2026-08-10 08:01:55 UTC by salma_ayman ♦25 |
| 170906968 (Comments: 2) | vme50looklook (Discussed changesets: 1) | 另外，name:en不应该是线路的列表 commented 2026-08-10 07:59:59 UTC by hahae ♦48 |
| 187021860 (Comments: 3) | gragox (Discussed changesets: 1) | The shape of 7a is still modified compared to what it was before. commented 2026-08-10 07:58:31 UTC by kaposts ♦7 |
| 187211344 (Comments: 1) | LeX Rooster (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the contributions but please restrict each changeset to a smaller geographical area. Thank you. commented 2026-08-10 07:51:10 UTC by sykul ♦91 |
| 187090511 (Comments: 2) | CH_HHH (Discussed changesets: 10) | Die Gefahrenstellen an den Pfeilern waren früher schon ausgeschildert, ob mit "Radfahrer absteigen" oder "Achtung" oder noch anders, kann ich mich allerdings nicht erinnern. commented 2026-08-10 07:50:37 UTC by CH_HHH ♦8 |
| 186702162 (Comments: 4) | Sprinkles70 (Discussed changesets: 1) | swimming pools & ice rink may deserve own tagging as it goes beyond regular gym commented 2026-08-10 07:42:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 185177958 (Comments: 3) | skunk (Discussed changesets: 12) | if it is gone it would be better to just delete it commented 2026-08-10 07:40:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,270 |
| 186987207 (Comments: 2) | DF45 (Discussed changesets: 39) | Bonjour, C'est une erreur. Il y a 3 polygones maintenant. Seul celui du sud est privé. Je vais bientôt m'occuper des deux autres. commented 2026-08-10 07:33:41 UTC by DF45 ♦24 |
| 187214605 (Comments: 1) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 15) | 纠正：是大南门 commented 2026-08-10 07:30:41 UTC by hahae ♦48 |
| 187140367 (Comments: 3) | flappiegrrr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Mh, dann dürfte das in fast allen meinen Changesets seit April so drin stehen. Außer ganz zu Beginn in Oberhaid RLP habe ich Basemap nie zum abzeichnen genutzt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181295832 Hier aber auch gl... commented 2026-08-10 07:29:51 UTC by flappiegrrr ♦2 |
| 156117296 (Comments: 2) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 48) | Sorry for upgrading. So I must now map and classify roads and bridges according to their designation by the public works and highways government agency like the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) in the Philippines. commented 2026-08-10 07:20:35 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦42 |
| 187167246 (Comments: 2) | keckal09 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187213984 commented 2026-08-10 07:17:37 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 129052858 (Comments: 2) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 48) | Yes. Any power lines must not be deleted yet if the structures and wires were not yet removed. Retirement of structures are only made if they were removed or dismantled. Therefore, not yet removed lines but deenergized must marked the voltage as 0. commented 2026-08-10 07:17:36 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦42 |
| 187208629 (Comments: 3) | Frosch42 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14084764005 gelöscht wegen Dubeltte, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3107610712 commented 2026-08-10 07:14:51 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 67988180 (Comments: 5) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 48) | Yes. At least I already addressed for not replying to other users. So I must now reply to them. Thank you and you're welcome again. commented 2026-08-10 07:14:35 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦42 |
| 106156688 (Comments: 2) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 48) | Districts of Bataan were already added. commented 2026-08-10 07:10:03 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦42 |
| 142642167 (Comments: 2) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 48) | You're welcome. commented 2026-08-10 07:08:44 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦42 |
| 187199009 (Comments: 1) | 0202lb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Für den Anfang war das vielleicht etwas zu viel und zu komplex. - Du hast eine bauliche Trennung eingetragen, obwohl es ein Gebäude ist. - Die Arztpraxen nehmen das ganze Gebäud... commented 2026-08-10 07:06:58 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,584 |
| 187159966 (Comments: 1) | Aidan Murray (Discussed changesets: 1) | just fyi, you might have uploaded the wrong image in mapcomplete, check the panoramax tag https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&pic=d9d64b6c-2b79-4ec1-9d9e-2a6521eaff2a commented 2026-08-10 06:53:27 UTC by Thibaultmol ♦64 |
| 187032369 (Comments: 3) | Pietje-71 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Top dankjewel commented 2026-08-10 06:47:12 UTC by Pietje-71 ♦3 |
| 187052952 (Comments: 2) | rskedgell (Discussed changesets: 126) | Thanks - fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187212695 commented 2026-08-10 06:41:39 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,896 |
| 173003195 (Comments: 1) | Elhamn1992 (Discussed changesets: 26) | واژه «ایستگاه مترو» در یک ایستگاه مترو، نماد استانداردسازی نیست بلکه مصداق خرابکاری است. commented 2026-08-10 06:41:26 UTC by Gitasaleh Virast ♦37 |
| 186975472 (Comments: 1) | LuunaEclipse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! As I can see, you have accidentally merged the node of the village with the node of the post office. Please check commented 2026-08-10 06:35:21 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦283 |
| 154615509 (Comments: 1) | mike140 (Discussed changesets: 42) | https://share.google/lZpJFzisOsz3Yr3hs commented 2026-08-10 06:30:31 UTC by mike140 ♦389 |
| 187152752 (Comments: 4) | emvee (Discussed changesets: 201) | Okay,bedankt, gedaan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187212186 commented 2026-08-10 06:27:37 UTC by emvee ♦420 |
| 187122001 (Comments: 3) | Anselmus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hoi, Een brandweerwagen zal niet over een voetpad routeren. Fietspaden nog wel als de breedte is opgegeven. We kennen niet de scripts van bv LiveNav. Voor hulpdiensten lijkt me toch wel handig dat die brandgangen in OSM staan. Groe... commented 2026-08-10 06:26:16 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187201754 (Comments: 5) | OSM078 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Scholen zijn een apart verhaal net als kerken. Die worden vaak op een vlak getagd ook vanwege de aparte rendering. Gr eggie commented 2026-08-10 06:23:32 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187193283 (Comments: 1) | 17Publius76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187211891 commented 2026-08-10 06:21:35 UTC by ajmat ♦323 |
| 186587772 (Comments: 2) | Michela Tomasella (Discussed changesets: 1) | thank you. It is the webgis of the governament organisation of this area that is Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia. The "Biotopi" has formal perimeter and for Biotopo Torbiera Scichizza it was wrong. I tried to redesign it to get it closer to t... commented 2026-08-10 06:21:08 UTC by Michela Tomasella ♦1 |
| 187202474 (Comments: 1) | OSM078 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Info samengevoegd met adresnode. Tip.. In OSM geen spaties toevoegen aan postcode. Mapse commented 2026-08-10 06:20:11 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187106106 (Comments: 2) | Pooh01 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Fixed! changeset/187211948 commented 2026-08-10 06:20:05 UTC by Pooh01 ♦27 |
| 187202515 (Comments: 1) | OSM078 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Info samengevoegd met adresnode. Gr eggie commented 2026-08-10 06:18:14 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187203187 (Comments: 3) | OSM078 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi, Je kunt het beste een reguliere editor gebruiken op de PC. Organic is leuk voor onderweg, Bv Editor ID of nog beter editor JOSM.. Aanrader.. editor josm stap voor stap https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-v... commented 2026-08-10 06:15:33 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 187202923 (Comments: 1) | OSM078 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hoi, Dit is dubbel getagd. aangepast, MVG eggie commented 2026-08-10 06:13:19 UTC by eggie ♦46,553 |
| 184974214 (Comments: 13) | Flamen_Sru (Discussed changesets: 33) | Thanks for checking and confirming the update eggie. commented 2026-08-10 06:12:56 UTC by Flamen_Sru ♦43 |
| 185161320 (Comments: 13) | CopyKill (Discussed changesets: 1) | Um ein weiteres Gegenargument zu bringen: Tramgleise haben andere Charakteristiken als die Art und Weise wie sie verlegt sind. Zum Beispiel engere Kurvenradien, andere Luchtraumprofile usw. Das railway Tag ist wichtig für externe Datenkons... commented 2026-08-10 06:06:10 UTC by CopyKill ♦1 |
| 186563940 (Comments: 8) | ToTo_Kwon (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you, Wildsharky commented 2026-08-10 06:02:17 UTC by ToTo_Kwon ♦2 |
| 187209464 (Comments: 1) | Картограф-любитель (Discussed changesets: 12) | Что же ты дорожный граф ломаешь? Заработаешь ты бан своим вандализмом. commented 2026-08-10 05:58:08 UTC by Stalker61 ♦332 |
| 187007594 (Comments: 4) | Zxilef (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah yes, I see now. Thanks. commented 2026-08-10 05:54:04 UTC by Zxilef ♦1 |
| 187210753 (Comments: 1) | keshvarifar (Discussed changesets: 1) | The alley has become a dead end and is no longer connected to Shahid Timourian Street. commented 2026-08-10 05:35:41 UTC by keshvarifar ♦1 |
| 187207016 (Comments: 4) | jjgliding (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks :-) commented 2026-08-10 05:31:14 UTC by jjgliding ♦1 |
| 187043842 (Comments: 1) | andreabuon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187209569 commented 2026-08-10 05:25:41 UTC by Wildsharky ♦795 |
| 187146506 (Comments: 1) | Pista Motorsport (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, I've removed several sections of duplicated raceway. I think the entire circuit was duplicated. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-08-10 05:21:12 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,324 |
| 187186568 (Comments: 1) | Torey360 (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hola, voy a revertir el cambio porque en la imagen satelital de Bing que utilizaste es muy antigua aprox. 2023. Para el Área Metropolitana de Cochabamba la imagen Mapbox es de feb/2026 y en este sector casi esa via está sin "... commented 2026-08-10 05:14:45 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,695 |
| 185676359 (Comments: 4) | ElliottPlack (Discussed changesets: 100) | Thanks for the extra detail. I've done some testing on my end and can't reproduce a routing issue tied to this changeset — the tags changed here don't affect access through the gate. What I did find is that the node itself... commented 2026-08-10 05:13:31 UTC by ElliottPlack ♦947 |
| 186790944 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 23) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187209990 commented 2026-08-10 05:03:31 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,946 |
| 186767076 (Comments: 1) | chad e dickens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/187209990 Comment: "Revert unclear map edits" commented 2026-08-10 05:02:45 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,969 |
| 187205427 (Comments: 2) | AL_W (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted this changeset now. commented 2026-08-10 05:02:27 UTC by nevw ♦2,299 |
| 126118371 (Comments: 2) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 144) | But I can see what you're trying to get across, that the driveway is for that specific property. If you want to mark the specific entry point for the property, then what you did with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8092791018/history is proba... commented 2026-08-10 04:39:56 UTC by aharvey ♦1,973 |
| 187110445 (Comments: 3) | awesomeapps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Never mind, saw there was a later edit that corrected it to the right Burger King. commented 2026-08-10 04:36:18 UTC by Trent_ABI ♦1 |
| 187058281 (Comments: 2) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hey, Thank you! That is helpful :) Happy to see another mapper working in this area. commented 2026-08-10 04:20:41 UTC by Loopslol7 ♦30 |
| 187203890 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 270) | The comment should have been "Fixed validation errors" 🤦 commented 2026-08-10 04:15:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦326 |
| 183574815 (Comments: 1) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 75) | Natfoot this is private property, please mark it as such commented 2026-08-10 01:50:45 UTC by Cookie Guru ♦16 |
| 184113963 (Comments: 1) | yodaddyisfly (Discussed changesets: 3) | The I81 nodes you added, are you sure they are flock? commented 2026-08-10 01:11:45 UTC by jtetterton ♦1 |
| 4256347 (Comments: 3) | caminaspe (Discussed changesets: 6) | [La Reconstruction de l'Hermione initiée à Rochefort](https://fregate-hermione.com/lhermione/sa-reconstruction/) [a été reprise à Anglet](https://fregate-hermione.com/). commented 2026-08-10 00:38:13 UTC by caminaspe ♦1 |
| 186683808 (Comments: 1) | cbmiller2610 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi cbmiller2610, please note that due to the unusual addresses we have here in Utah, we use additional tags to represent street names. In this case, the "West" part of this street name was already correctly represented in the name:prefix=* ... commented 2026-08-10 00:31:30 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦136 |
| 187182066 (Comments: 1) | Fach-Stal Krzysztof jeleńkowski (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standa... commented 2026-08-10 00:29:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 186518464 (Comments: 6) | BestOrelo (Discussed changesets: 1) | 已于 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187205305 中改正 commented 2026-08-10 00:14:55 UTC by BestOrelo ♦1 |
| 187204871 (Comments: 1) | jpmaceda (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé los cambios, los cruces de caminos y arroyos me parecen bien. Este también, pero los nombres los ponemos con la primera letra en mayúsculas, por ejemplo "Laguna Mickey&q... commented 2026-08-10 00:11:11 UTC by caprieldeluca ♦65 |
| 187205126 (Comments: 1) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 127) | Fire storm seen here changeset/186667004 commented 2026-08-10 00:07:13 UTC by Hb- ♦386 |
| 186667004 (Comments: 1) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 127) | source https://www.tiktok.com/@laruedelovalie/video/7667097134138789153 commented 2026-08-10 00:06:25 UTC by Hb- ♦386 |
| 187199705 (Comments: 2) | gpserror defined (Discussed changesets: 7) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187204903 commented 2026-08-09 23:55:11 UTC by kiritimati_c7g ♦12 |
| 187177497 (Comments: 1) | Yuwanisha (Discussed changesets: 2) | Unfortunately, use of Google Maps/Google Earth as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. Furthermore, like your previous changeset, many of yo... commented 2026-08-09 23:41:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187127651 (Comments: 1) | Yuwanisha (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Yuwanisha, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution! Unfortunately, a lot of what was added here doesn't appear to be correct, or doesn't make much sense. For example: - building:levels=0 How can a ... commented 2026-08-09 23:30:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 187165831 (Comments: 1) | Sam Jayah (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Chief Engineer Jayah, Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I've noticed you've been consistently adding as similar description=* tag to nearly a thousand highways around northern Sri Lanka, stating that "No ... commented 2026-08-09 23:16:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦1,806 |
| 186975353 (Comments: 3) | Dantine (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sorry, I didn't notice you were using Vespucci, I imagine it's hard to edit long routes on mobile. iD editor is always a pain to work with relations too. In my experience JOSM is the easiest to use to fix route relations, but I've seen... commented 2026-08-09 23:12:16 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦110 |
| 187202567 (Comments: 1) | mwalk600 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for requesting a review; there was an issue with crossing ways in this changeset. Fixed in changeset/187203680. commented 2026-08-09 22:45:31 UTC by deneben ♦6 |
| 186738515 (Comments: 3) | Lucas Santana (Discussed changesets: 8) | De nada. commented 2026-08-09 22:35:14 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦903 |
| 187014721 (Comments: 1) | ChargerHouseUAE (Discussed changesets: 1) | why did you place your own shop at the wrong location? even the location on your site is wrong commented 2026-08-09 22:31:44 UTC by guy-incognito ♦2 |