| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 184956548 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:31:49 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 185635634 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-02 06:31:28 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 189790624 (Comments: 5) | blosfrth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Afegir les voreres és una bona opció. Diria que la majoria d'editors consideren que milloren el mapa. Altres usuarios prefereixen simplificar/reduir el número d'algunes voreres.Si afegeixes les voreres, no caldria afegi... commented 2026-10-01 21:09:32 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,884 |
| 185849373 (Comments: 2) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:24:26 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 185850135 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 18:24:14 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 189815304 (Comments: 1) | efolgado (Discussed changesets: 3) | Buenas, Las calles peatonales (highway=pedestrian) aplican principalmente en zonas urbanas, siendo más adecuado highway=footway para los senderos o caminos interurbanos. Además, donde has añadido el camino ya existen unas ... commented 2026-10-01 13:32:00 UTC by marcmarti ♦110 |
| 186275678 (Comments: 1) | pavel bankevich (Discussed changesets: 15) | #mapbox_roads_attributes commented 2026-10-01 12:59:58 UTC by pavel bankevich ♦15 |
| 171244107 (Comments: 3) | Marion_Moseby (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thank you for your answer. The tagging was wrong as it is not a memorial. I have fixed it. Regards commented 2026-10-01 10:52:38 UTC by kapazao ♦1,045 |
| 189175227 (Comments: 2) | blacx (Discussed changesets: 22) | si, selecciona la capa ICGC provisional commented 2026-10-01 00:09:51 UTC by blacx ♦88 |
| 166209919 (Comments: 1) | Valario127 (Discussed changesets: 6) | What you wanted to express by traffic_calming=choker on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21678845/history ? It looks like it is simply place where lane count get smaller on motorway - have you tried to map that? Or is it more significant? commented 2026-09-30 19:28:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 189748010 (Comments: 1) | User202608 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189788304 commented 2026-09-30 18:11:27 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189565098 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630480 commented 2026-09-29 23:09:36 UTC by Davileci ♦144 |
| 189564941 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630995 commented 2026-09-29 23:08:09 UTC by Davileci ♦144 |
| 189565022 (Comments: 1) | Ian Jackson (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189630995 commented 2026-09-29 23:06:33 UTC by Davileci ♦144 |
| 169346113 (Comments: 1) | Balázs Hidvégi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416753924 parking:left=parking:left? That does not look te be correct to me. commented 2026-09-29 13:59:04 UTC by Kees 59 ♦139 |
| 189681111 (Comments: 1) | Ignasi Cervera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189720726 commented 2026-09-29 10:48:31 UTC by rajdhani ♦526 |
| 189698855 (Comments: 1) | rumbrummer (Discussed changesets: 17) | The duplicate node you linked is *not* a duplicate saddle point, just a mountain pass. Additionally, the deleted node is _also_ a mountain pass, just for the other lane of the node. Looking through the history, it was adjusted according to ... commented 2026-09-29 07:50:50 UTC by KartKollektor ♦45 |
| 189681546 (Comments: 1) | ctv43 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Esta es una cuenta sock-puppet para evitar un bloqueo de https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21010. Se corrige el nombre name:es por el correcto > Tírig. commented 2026-09-28 16:34:40 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,884 |
| 189598159 (Comments: 1) | enealocatelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I don't think a meeting point for tours should be mapped in OpenStreetMap. If this tour company has an office, this node would be better suited in that location. Thanks commented 2026-09-28 08:51:31 UTC by marcmarti ♦110 |
| 118281078 (Comments: 3) | KVI0n (Discussed changesets: 60) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189661686 commented 2026-09-28 06:45:01 UTC by KVI0n ♦58 |
| 189488008 (Comments: 1) | Ricardo Lausín (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189622648 commented 2026-09-28 04:52:40 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,069 |
| 189624185 (Comments: 1) | IrvingNgr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. One of the most important core principles on OpenStreetMap is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps. In particular, use of Googl... commented 2026-09-28 01:05:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,220 |
| 170695459 (Comments: 14) | Davileci (Discussed changesets: 31) | I think I agree, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area is confusing. I wrote about this on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-station-halt-tagging-review-request/148096 commented 2026-09-27 18:40:55 UTC by Ian Jackson ♦3 |
| 189607132 (Comments: 1) | flapnuta (Discussed changesets: 2) | Buenas, la etiqueta cycleway=opposite es obsoleta, siendo más adecuado oneway:bicycle=no, que ya estaba puesta en el carrer de Martí. Saludos commented 2026-09-27 15:24:48 UTC by marcmarti ♦110 |
| 189293084 (Comments: 2) | swaree (Discussed changesets: 14) | hola Marc, disculpa per les edicions errònies. si no s'ha fet ja, em compromet a canviar-les o ara o quan s'actualitze el NSI, que el seguisc de ben a prop. Salutacions, commented 2026-09-27 14:39:29 UTC by swaree ♦13 |
| 189258220 (Comments: 1) | yopaseopor (Discussed changesets: 152) | Bones, segur que aquest enllaç realment existeix? A la ortofoto provisional que tinc no em surt aquest enllaç, ni les obres semblen haver començat. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1560534249 Salut commented 2026-09-27 14:00:08 UTC by marcmarti ♦110 |
| 189560865 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 90) | Hallo, is called Fala language: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fala_language Only has ISO 639-3, since it's really minority: https://iso639-3.sil.org/code/fax commented 2026-09-27 13:44:53 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦352 |
| 188991325 (Comments: 1) | adrian87bp (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola adrian87bp, Muchas gracias por editar en Segovia importando las geometrías de los edificios desde el Catastro, pero recuerda, esto es Segovia y el Catastro no actualiza su información con el rigor que sería adecuado.<... commented 2026-09-27 13:28:37 UTC by Arturo Francisco Barbero ♦71 |
| 189598432 (Comments: 2) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 90) | sí, el addr:street de toda la calle es Las Llanas zumarkalea. Que coincida con la vía. commented 2026-09-26 20:07:53 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦352 |
| 189594176 (Comments: 2) | elGros (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, gràcies, en prenc nota commented 2026-09-26 19:46:02 UTC by elGros ♦1 |
| 189447101 (Comments: 5) | Monchinho (Discussed changesets: 48) | >Puxen ese "da" en name:gl porque o artigo forma parte do topónimo, pero como non figura no cartel físico da rúa non toquei "name" Recorda que "name" debe ser igual que "name:gl".... commented 2026-09-26 18:36:49 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦376 |
| 150036192 (Comments: 1) | Pablo_BM (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255246469/history has building:levels = 0.1 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 12:51:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |
| 170348524 (Comments: 2) | jemily1 (Discussed changesets: 43) | fixed commented 2026-09-25 17:13:26 UTC by jemily1 ♦66 |
| 142840546 (Comments: 2) | ansuta (Discussed changesets: 15) | You're right, changed. commented 2026-09-25 17:02:21 UTC by ansuta ♦14 |
| 144661193 (Comments: 1) | tx94 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5539023 ? commented 2026-09-25 16:01:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,156 |