| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 186004150 (Comments: 2) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hi Lezurex Ich verstehe die Diskussion nicht. Das GWR und in dessen Fahrwasser Swisstopo verwenden die amtlichen Namen der Orte bzw. der Gemeinden. Bei Rüti im Zürcher Oberland heisst der Ort Rüti ZH und die Gemeinde Rüti (ZH).... commented 2026-07-26 14:03:20 UTC by Wikilux ♦16 |
| 186223992 (Comments: 3) | infrared645644653 (Discussed changesets: 1) | fixed for some reason the name was applied to the restaurant next door 5 month ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5456480486/history/5 commented 2026-07-26 12:50:40 UTC by infrared645644653 ♦1 |
| 186346497 (Comments: 2) | habi (Discussed changesets: 459) | Revertiert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186361967 commented 2026-07-25 18:32:26 UTC by habi ♦2,205 |
| 185713714 (Comments: 1) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 85) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164113191 commented 2026-07-25 10:01:51 UTC by 9_tab ♦92 |
| 182760134 (Comments: 5) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 16) | > you merged those perspectives together. Isn't that natural? Maybe I misunderstand the point of having https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alt_name and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name . Depending on the context, t... commented 2026-07-25 10:00:09 UTC by 9_tab ♦92 |
| 164906393 (Comments: 4) | akosgy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sure, no issue, if you think it's still worth having the trail on the map, because it is passable, then feel free to put it back. My understanding is more that only the usable trails should be indicated on the map, since these attributes/tags ar... commented 2026-07-25 05:59:31 UTC by akosgy ♦1 |
| 186306203 (Comments: 1) | Makeena (Discussed changesets: 55) | Actual changeset spans South to Manegg commented 2026-07-24 17:07:08 UTC by Makeena ♦68 |
| 185980423 (Comments: 4) | d_berger (Discussed changesets: 89) | Ich Diskutiere in CS-Kommentaren nicht über Grundsatzfragen. Dafür gibt es ein Forum. Wer Angst vor unvollständigen Daten hat sollte sich nicht OSM als Hobby aussuchen. Es gibt in der Schweiz kein Anrecht auf Fussgän... commented 2026-07-23 20:35:32 UTC by d_berger ♦222 |
| 164113191 (Comments: 4) | defikarte (Discussed changesets: 85) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14014504302/history/1 showed up since, but maybe the report is just too strict. BTW Shouldn't it be Mo-Fr ? commented 2026-07-23 11:23:38 UTC by 9_tab ♦92 |
| 186225542 (Comments: 1) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 16) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186225542 Please delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185891197 if that is gone too. commented 2026-07-23 10:29:43 UTC by 9_tab ♦92 |
| 186194670 (Comments: 1) | SimonPoole (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1543058805. I think this still needs to be cleaned up. commented 2026-07-23 10:24:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,695 |
| 186197101 (Comments: 1) | SimonPoole (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1543065847. I think this still needs to be cleaned up. commented 2026-07-23 10:23:30 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,695 |
| 184515411 (Comments: 10) | Sebasawk (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi 9_tab, thank you for your understanding on my late response as I was out of office and was not able to check my messages until Monday. For OSM editing, we don't have an alternative spec document to the OSM Wiki. https://wiki.openstree... commented 2026-07-21 14:59:29 UTC by unenTT ♦21 |
| 185642754 (Comments: 3) | Delli1951 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Falls mein Kommentar Ihnen aggressiv erschien, möchte mich Ihnen versichern, dass dies nicht so gmeint war. Anhand Ihrer Darstellung vermute ich, dass die Löschung ein Versehen war. Dennoch hat sie stattgefunden. Siehe: https://www.o... commented 2026-07-21 12:16:11 UTC by Svenito92 ♦5 |
| 181903951 (Comments: 4) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 16) | > No worries, correcting these typos is easy :) Agree, even if it seems it isn't always welcome. Some even get annoyed if the pragmatic imperfection of our approach gets pointed out to a random (most recent) mapper by OSMOSE ;) ... commented 2026-07-21 10:16:20 UTC by 9_tab ♦92 |
| 158071613 (Comments: 4) | wies1 (Discussed changesets: 163) | Hallo wies1, alles klar, merci für Deine Antworten. Ich habe die Adresse des Gebäudes gerade zu Schimelrych 12 geändert. Beste Grüsse und happy mapping! Paul commented 2026-07-21 07:13:23 UTC by paulbrunner ♦71 |
| 185832019 (Comments: 3) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 420) | There is no standard key for this website. And the website is "booking.com". Please don't do such changes. commented 2026-07-21 05:04:16 UTC by 9_tab ♦92 |
| 71982057 (Comments: 1) | nounours77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3248008184 Der Link hier im Kreuzlinger Hafen ist kaputt, kannst du den reparieren oder sollen wir den Punkt löschen? Ist von dem Angebot etwas vor Ort erkennbar? commented 2026-07-20 22:21:23 UTC by dreua ♦131 |
| 183419844 (Comments: 14) | 9_tab (Discussed changesets: 16) | Good to hear: at least we agree on the mapping. Happy Mapping. commented 2026-07-20 22:20:25 UTC by 9_tab ♦92 |
| 177397664 (Comments: 3) | welzheimerwald (Discussed changesets: 60) | Yes, and it's even Seerhein in English: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seerhein so also name:en=Seerhein commented 2026-07-20 21:48:30 UTC by trial ♦1,190 |
| 186074568 (Comments: 1) | Fjellrev (Discussed changesets: 6) | Dankeschön. commented 2026-07-20 18:33:43 UTC by habi ♦2,205 |
| 186074516 (Comments: 1) | Fjellrev (Discussed changesets: 6) | Mersi! commented 2026-07-20 18:33:11 UTC by habi ♦2,205 |