| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 180601155 (Comments: 2) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 48) | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct commented 2026-04-04 21:10:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,700 |
| 180845961 (Comments: 2) | Taktaal (Discussed changesets: 37) | Trump, Trump, Trump 🐒🦧🦍 commented 2026-04-04 14:36:06 UTC by anjoco ♦1 |
| 180614224 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 432) | Super, vielen Dank, ich hab die Öffnungzeiten ergänzt commented 2026-04-04 14:29:18 UTC by highbuilder ♦13 |
| 180830861 (Comments: 1) | Taktaal (Discussed changesets: 37) | danke vielmals ;) commented 2026-04-04 10:49:50 UTC by Piagno ♦129 |
| 175063436 (Comments: 1) | anjoco (Discussed changesets: 3) | Why did you change https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2295971 to a "footway"? This makes no sense. commented 2026-04-04 10:07:30 UTC by Taktaal ♦61 |
| 180755862 (Comments: 6) | micka11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo @micka11, habe das Changeset wie gewünscht zurückgesetzt. Viele Grüße und #HappyMapping commented 2026-04-03 08:59:40 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,189 |
| 168013970 (Comments: 2) | captaininler (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi. Yes, it was supposed to mark legal pedestrian access. Thank you for your note. I've changed it to the correct tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180786689 commented 2026-04-02 20:42:38 UTC by captaininler ♦16 |
| 174102572 (Comments: 7) | gnv29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Parfait, merci ! commented 2026-04-02 20:31:44 UTC by gnv29 ♦1 |
| 166990495 (Comments: 1) | Piz Pachific (Discussed changesets: 25) | Auf Basis welcher Quelle wurde die Hauptstrasse von Samedan nach S-Chanf von Via Chantunela nach Engadinerstrasse umbenannt? Im Amtlichen Strassenverzeichnis ist das nicht so.. https://map.geo.admin.ch/#/map?lang=de¢er=2790107.12,1161066.... commented 2026-04-02 20:31:24 UTC by captaininler ♦16 |
| 180155887 (Comments: 1) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 49) | Merci pour les mises à jour. Une question sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79211056/history/16 : Pourquoi cette modification? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alt_name est adapté pour ce type de changement, surtout si le nom... commented 2026-04-02 18:52:52 UTC by 9_tab ♦30 |
| 180763372 (Comments: 1) | Cardinale_77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-04-02 11:42:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,795 |
| 180243487 (Comments: 3) | DomFlc (Discussed changesets: 2) | I put up a note on this matter: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5229737 Maybe you can check again if you're onsite? Otherwise an other user is able to verify. commented 2026-04-02 07:30:17 UTC by chnuessli ♦129 |
| 157051678 (Comments: 1) | surrli (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo Surrli Du hast in diesem Changeset und bestimmt auch noch in anderen Trottoirs zugefügt. Wenn du das machst solltest du den sidewalk-tag der entsprechenden Strasse auch noch anpassen. Sonst sind die Trottoirs dann doppelt vorhanden. ... commented 2026-04-02 05:02:42 UTC by nurdafur ♦249 |
| 180573946 (Comments: 3) | Hegau Bodensee (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hallo Hegau Bodensee! Auf der gerenderten Karte ist ja schon das Restaurant mit dem Namen zu sehen, zum Sichtbarmachen sollte das doch reichen. Es gibt halt nicht viele Gebäude, die nach OSM-tagging-Richtlinien wirklich so einen Eigennamen h... commented 2026-04-01 20:45:27 UTC by seewäldler ♦178 |
| 180614972 (Comments: 2) | habi (Discussed changesets: 432) | Es ist auch kein Baumstumpf mehr dort, der wurde weggefräst. commented 2026-04-01 16:14:10 UTC by intillama ♦1 |
| 180581478 (Comments: 2) | MaxMuster99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180622815 commented 2026-04-01 13:01:43 UTC by Wildsharky ♦249 |
| 41394346 (Comments: 1) | chatelao (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ciao Oli Hier hast du den Quartieren eine `swisstopo:BFS_NUMMER` vergeben. Für http://boundaries.osm.ch suche ich Schweizweit nach dieser Nummer, für die Quartiere von Bern gibt's die aber *nicht* in den swisstopo-Daten. F... commented 2026-04-01 11:47:54 UTC by habi ♦2,069 |
| 180674268 (Comments: 1) | IanBennett (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Ian, Thanks for adding those steps, that have been overlooked by earlier mapper. A few hints for you to progress in your understanding: 1) Some ways in that area are tagged as highway=path and some others as highway=footway. Please ch... commented 2026-04-01 08:02:50 UTC by MFlamm ♦70 |
| 168113545 (Comments: 1) | Ddzz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can the tag "communication:amateur_radio=yes" for the node 12952722252 be confirmed? commented 2026-03-30 21:18:44 UTC by drdns ♦4 |
| 105248209 (Comments: 1) | romanh (Discussed changesets: 12) | Can the tag "communication:amateur_radio:repeater=yes" for the node 8762348914 be confirmed? commented 2026-03-30 21:16:36 UTC by drdns ♦4 |
| 148567366 (Comments: 1) | Linus Fischer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Value of tag "name" can be used as "operator" as well of node 6459748645. commented 2026-03-30 20:42:32 UTC by drdns ♦4 |
| 180376326 (Comments: 1) | bk1_168 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo bk1_168 bicycle=use_sidepath ist nicht gleich stark was die "Verbotenheit" angeht, wie bicycle=no. Der Tag ist ein Hinweis an die Routing Engines, dass hier, sofern nicht anders möglich, der Radweg benutzt werden soll. Er ... commented 2026-03-30 12:38:20 UTC by Lezurex ♦236 |
| 162742768 (Comments: 2) | Voonosm (Discussed changesets: 35) | Natürlich, sieht man doch. Nä, Hirnfurz .. vermutlich aus versehen irgendwo reingeklickt, habs geändert. merci :) commented 2026-03-30 12:33:55 UTC by Voonosm ♦13 |
| 180615277 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 432) | Nein, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5225155 erledigt... commented 2026-03-30 07:19:46 UTC by habi ♦2,069 |