| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 183818128 (Comments: 1) | sanzay (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, Je n'arrive pas à utiliser l'ID Panoramax, je ne sais pas si c'est un problème de mon côté ? Aussi je n'ai vu utilisé que le tag "panoramax" sans le suffixe ":view" ju... commented 2026-06-12 21:48:53 UTC by mw014 ♦19 |
| 8138435 (Comments: 1) | Benben (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Je réagis tard mais la ref a un motif A9A9A9 :) commented 2026-06-12 14:47:48 UTC by LudovicG ♦148 |
| 180181133 (Comments: 1) | Furdrien (Discussed changesets: 50) | Bonjour Furdrien. Créer un multipolygon à partir de ways qui n'ont aucune signification propre, comme tu l'as fait pour la gare de Us, est découragé. Je t'invite à lire le paragraphe "Rema... commented 2026-06-12 14:44:45 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,198 |
| 178524578 (Comments: 1) | sel poivre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Je me permets de te faire remarquer qu'en complétant ce bâtiment, tu as simplement... enlevé le tag principal de l'objet 🙃 : building=* Je l'ai donc remis. commented 2026-06-12 13:35:50 UTC by AurélienQ ♦169 |
| 164079142 (Comments: 1) | LB31-SNT-Ami (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12698965237/history has material = beton that was added in this edit what was meant by material=beton ? Maybe intended meaning was material=concrete ? commented 2026-06-12 13:27:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,957 |
| 183991358 (Comments: 2) | Bauxite (Discussed changesets: 4) | J’ai refait la modification correctement lors du changeset/184009773. commented 2026-06-12 10:20:21 UTC by Bauxite ♦8 |
| 181324039 (Comments: 2) | Gwen_ch (Discussed changesets: 4) | en référence à cet objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497692606 commented 2026-06-12 08:57:43 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,332 |
| 158432225 (Comments: 3) | josmougn (Discussed changesets: 82) | Oui. Exactement ce que je dit ;-). Ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18217065#map=19/48.773563/2.269451&layers=N tu as une partie commune qui est "extérieure" de chaque côté. Donc soit on met une relation de... commented 2026-06-12 07:35:52 UTC by trial ♦1,166 |
| 183991316 (Comments: 1) | Grocrab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ne pas tenir compte de cette modification d’indication de pente s’il vous plaît. Merci. commented 2026-06-11 22:01:46 UTC by Grocrab ♦1 |
| 183945075 (Comments: 2) | ChRogel (Discussed changesets: 35) | Exact, j'ai fait l'erreur dene pas rétablir les relations ans le segment créé au N de l'intersection principale du bourg, car le Chemin du Donjon ne peut la rejoindre; J'y serai sans doute revenu, mais merci d... commented 2026-06-11 20:30:24 UTC by ChRogel ♦14 |
| 95089945 (Comments: 4) | LucieALO (Discussed changesets: 8) | cool, merci <3 commented 2026-06-11 17:54:04 UTC by Patchanka ♦436 |
| 175675557 (Comments: 3) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 73) | Bonjour, La façon dont je comprends la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport ; c'est qu'il doit y avoir une relation stop_area par type de transport (version OSM, ici un pour le tram et un pour le trai... commented 2026-06-11 17:43:50 UTC by AurélienQ ♦169 |
| 181130041 (Comments: 3) | Bovi887 (Discussed changesets: 6) | No worries, thanks for the reply. commented 2026-06-11 17:27:08 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,198 |
| 175223358 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 167) | Hello, Petite question car je ne connais pas le coin : c'est normal que les `name` sont passés du français en corse ? Les plaques de rue ont été changées et sont en corse ? À+ commented 2026-06-11 16:24:28 UTC by Hopla57 ♦64 |
| 40021229 (Comments: 1) | Rom1 (Discussed changesets: 66) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2341016099/history what is supposed to be fixed here? You added note=FIXME on this object and it is unclear what needs to be fixed commented 2026-06-11 14:57:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,957 |
| 180248844 (Comments: 1) | Patchanka (Discussed changesets: 46) | Salut, tu y a touché donc je te pose la question que j'ai posé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180096769 c'est plutôt un parc non https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490476734 / peut-être conti... commented 2026-06-11 13:58:43 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,332 |
| 180096769 (Comments: 1) | BotaFlo64 (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bonjour la zone n'est pas du natural=wood ici, cela recouvre des terres agricoles, une forêt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284406585), des bâtiments (bof pour cela https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural=wood) <... commented 2026-06-11 13:56:56 UTC by Vinber-Pro ♦1,332 |
| 17395198 (Comments: 2) | meihou (Discussed changesets: 9) | surement un copier-coller raté. J'ai retiré le tag. commented 2026-06-11 13:02:53 UTC by meihou ♦7 |
| 183958746 (Comments: 3) | Mathias_ADAV (Discussed changesets: 30) | Merci commented 2026-06-11 12:07:51 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦125 |
| 183905713 (Comments: 3) | Shohreh (Discussed changesets: 48) | corrigé dans 183952996, le noeud du magasin de vélo reste à localiser commented 2026-06-11 05:28:18 UTC by Mevess ♦102 |
| 183345463 (Comments: 4) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | It turns out they deleted some of their previous edits, so when I then reverted their changes, I put the bad data back again! They should all be deleted now, but if you spot any more, please fix them. Thanks! commented 2026-06-11 01:38:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183583252 (Comments: 2) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183948416 commented 2026-06-11 01:25:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 178548469 (Comments: 1) | Popolon (Discussed changesets: 34) | Bonjour. Il n’y a pas d’arrêt de bus rue Nicolaï (n13564401135). (Il y a bien un arrêt nommé Nicolaï, mais il est situé rue de Charenton, voir n613504986.) Est-ce que le nœud 13564401135 pe... commented 2026-06-10 21:48:06 UTC by Bauxite ♦8 |
| 99242015 (Comments: 1) | FD Gca (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, pourquoi bicycle=dismount ? commented 2026-06-10 19:53:48 UTC by 7tonin ♦27 |
| 183925389 (Comments: 1) | YannVar (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Je me suis permis d'ajuster les changements que vous avez réalisés, car l'accès de l'entrée du site jusqu’à l'arrière du poste électrique n'était plus ... commented 2026-06-10 18:52:18 UTC by jbcharron ♦171 |
| 183832769 (Comments: 1) | Jojolaglandouille (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, je vois que tu continues à oublier de mettre des rôles à certains membres de multipolygones ; peux tu corriger la relation 20949969 ? commented 2026-06-10 18:42:41 UTC by Yunan973 ♦120 |
| 174924564 (Comments: 4) | XioNoX (Discussed changesets: 32) | On a même une vue Panoramax, ou plutôt Panoramin : c8562bdd-22e6-4d2c-838e-a9e1a40f5c0e https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=18.49/48.3869813/-4.482237&pic=c8562bdd-22e6-4d2c-838e-a9e1a40f5c0... commented 2026-06-10 16:44:46 UTC by trial ♦1,166 |
| 183926215 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 309) | Please, use appropriate and meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-06-10 14:11:07 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦944 |
| 101264555 (Comments: 1) | maferikotupi (Discussed changesets: 50) | Bonjour, je vois qu'il s'agit d'un espace pro La Poste, est-ce vraiment à considérer comme un post_office=post_partner ? commented 2026-06-10 13:38:05 UTC by mw014 ♦19 |
| 158961547 (Comments: 1) | LaMèreveille (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12097993555 with strange values that overlaps with the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159863825 that describes the data center more accurately commented 2026-06-10 13:24:23 UTC by Open Risk ♦1 |
| 183400502 (Comments: 2) | Compatie (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah merci, je l'avais pas vu celui-là. commented 2026-06-10 09:39:30 UTC by Compatie ♦12 |
| 183033313 (Comments: 4) | jpdd (Discussed changesets: 2) | Merci ! commented 2026-06-10 09:06:51 UTC by jpdd ♦2 |
| 144757549 (Comments: 1) | FrançoiseR (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4718173374/history has bus = psv that was added in this edit What this tag means? This access value is unusual commented 2026-06-10 08:25:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,957 |
| 165046583 (Comments: 1) | Armire (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi Armire, you added material=laterite to track 1378161694 Laterite soil only exists in tropical countries. Did you mean surface=mud or surface=dirt ? Best, Julien commented 2026-06-10 07:24:48 UTC by julcnx ♦423 |
| 183880002 (Comments: 1) | GJ42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, merci pour ces ajouts. Si le chemin que vous avez ajouté n'est pas une piste cyclable il vaut mieux utiliser des attributs adaptés en mettant que c'est un chemin et en précisant que l'accès en fa... commented 2026-06-10 06:56:16 UTC by Syl ♦1,067 |
| 183892415 (Comments: 2) | Kalemillion (Discussed changesets: 1) | You can also use the subway validator, which signals tagging mistakes of rapid transit networks: https://mapgen-fi-1.comaps.app/subway/validator/france.html Happy mapping, Bovi887 commented 2026-06-10 05:24:02 UTC by Bovi887 ♦12 |
| 183488068 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183487890 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183487080 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183489212 (Comments: 2) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183489761 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183480217 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183478914 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183479595 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183481298 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183482749 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183486948 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177 commented 2026-06-10 04:05:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183348939 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183348054 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183348255 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183343651 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183343812 (Comments: 2) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183344776 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183298266 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183342483 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183343160 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:49 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183296264 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183296563 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183296576 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183296726 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183297467 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901414 commented 2026-06-10 03:24:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183294251 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183295822 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183294721 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:26 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183292264 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183292405 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183292156 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183292676 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183291851 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183288581 (Comments: 1) | ApekshaData (Discussed changesets: 37) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183901362 commented 2026-06-10 03:22:24 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,951 |
| 183632131 (Comments: 2) | Nzo18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | En l’absence de réponse, j’ai modifié pour utiliser le nom normalisé « Rue Blavier » et laissé name:etymology:wikidata=* (changeset/183886679). commented 2026-06-09 17:31:42 UTC by Ltrlg ♦211 |
| 183498463 (Comments: 2) | SIG Echirolles (Discussed changesets: 6) | Entendu ! il y a parfois des débats sur la question de caractérisation de l'objet arbre vs arbuste. Je fais remonter à mes collègues et le cas échéant, nous supprimerons l'identifiant rattach&... commented 2026-06-09 12:12:41 UTC by SIG Echirolles ♦7 |
| 182968838 (Comments: 3) | jpdd (Discussed changesets: 2) | Pluutôt que de supprimer le moins bien renseigné je pense qu'il vaut mieux supprimer le plus récent et mettre à jour le plus ancien, afin de conserver l'historique des mises à jour. Ce serait donc le htt... commented 2026-06-09 10:17:21 UTC by josmougn ♦266 |
| 182932285 (Comments: 1) | davvinci (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, La ref semble incomplète, vouliez-vous dire A0O5E7 ? (A005...) commented 2026-06-09 10:04:44 UTC by LudovicG ♦148 |
| 183712084 (Comments: 1) | ZorglZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour ZorgIZ, Aux dernières nouvelles, il y a avait bien une bande cyclable pour le DSC. Aurait elle été supprimée ? Bonne continuation Benoît commented 2026-06-09 07:01:34 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦214 |
| 77119834 (Comments: 1) | DELEPLANQUE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vous avez créé un supermarché https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6979416223 dans ce lieu de culte bouddhiste. Est-ce que c'est un supermarché comme un Carrefour ou Leclerc ou plutôt une épicerie, ou bouti... commented 2026-06-09 04:39:08 UTC by GeorgeKaplan ♦241 |
| 105046344 (Comments: 1) | gogo25171 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Le but d'OSM c'est d'avoir des infos fiables grace à des relevés fait sur le terrain par des gens qui connaissent la zone. Coller les approximation du cadastre par dessus ce qui a été fait correctement n... commented 2026-06-08 21:06:31 UTC by bestinthewest ♦6 |
| 183847509 (Comments: 1) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 34) | I apologize for the change set bbox size, I thought I had removed that one edit from the changeset. commented 2026-06-08 20:49:50 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦81 |
| 183579452 (Comments: 1) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 14) | Bonsoir Yasmina, Ce changement est remonté sur Osmose : https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/e5ad64c2-0d06-32cd-0007-821002150a2e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193913892/history a toujours é... commented 2026-06-08 18:48:07 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦125 |
| 183843357 (Comments: 2) | YBau (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275285273#map=17/45.846411/5.171078&layers=N commented 2026-06-08 18:46:42 UTC by YBau ♦4 |
| 183842374 (Comments: 1) | YBau (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dans cette modification : highway=raceway --> highway=service ou track leisure=sports_centre --> landuse=industrial Ce n'est pas un circuit de course mais un centre d'essai d'où la modification. Inspir&eacut... commented 2026-06-08 18:22:30 UTC by YBau ♦4 |
| 155563714 (Comments: 1) | symac (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello @symac, Un utilisateur de CoMaps a reporté cette boite a livre comme non visible sur le terrain. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5330088#map=15/44.07059/7.25547 Tu penses qu'on peut la supprimer ? commented 2026-06-08 18:07:41 UTC by GanKonMalade ♦8 |
| 183313058 (Comments: 3) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 57) | Understood, thanks for clearing it up. commented 2026-06-08 17:27:14 UTC by I-76 ♦81 |
| 183817403 (Comments: 3) | Roucool (Discussed changesets: 2) | Je prévois d'y passer prochainement pour vérifier. commented 2026-06-08 16:45:45 UTC by Syl ♦1,067 |
| 183816889 (Comments: 2) | Roucool (Discussed changesets: 2) | Effectivement, pour la "piscine" j'ai visiblement manqué d'attention. Je m'abstiendrais de faire ce genre de mapping à la va-vite à l'avenir... En tout cas peinture neuve au moment de la carto, c... commented 2026-06-08 14:40:23 UTC by Roucool ♦2 |
| 182301799 (Comments: 3) | Nanored4498 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je suis inscrit au 100km de cette année. Je pourrais essayé d'être plus vigilent le jour de la course et me rappeler du type de chemin. commented 2026-06-08 14:18:04 UTC by Nanored4498 ♦1 |
| 141158053 (Comments: 3) | Yaaaaaaaa (Discussed changesets: 55) | Salut, merci pour ton retour ! Aucun souci, c'était juste pour être sûr ^^ commented 2026-06-08 11:55:32 UTC by Vétérini ♦21 |
| 163441163 (Comments: 1) | rody (Discussed changesets: 2) | Visible on several imageries, BD Ortho for instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=19/48.409089/-4.504460 commented 2026-06-07 20:53:50 UTC by trial ♦1,166 |
| 54008069 (Comments: 2) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 167) | Hi Rod/@Rody, in "source=BMO/Ofis ar Brezhoneg janv2011", what don't you understand? Ofis ar Brezhoneg is for name:br. BMO (now BM) is for the reference. @Olyon simply updated the reference. The only issue is with place=hamlet, nowa... commented 2026-06-07 20:51:16 UTC by trial ♦1,166 |
| 91675339 (Comments: 1) | Hervé TUC (Discussed changesets: 40) | Ta cartographie est citée ici : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/cocasseries-cartographiques-et-toponymiques/29642/503 ;-) - à l'époque tu devais avoir raison. commented 2026-06-07 20:26:20 UTC by trial ♦1,166 |
| 183795492 (Comments: 2) | MXC48 (Discussed changesets: 4) | C'est fait. commented 2026-06-07 19:28:15 UTC by LySioS ♦150 |
| 183706366 (Comments: 1) | versgui (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, soit tu crées des places de parking individuelles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space, soit tu crées un parking global https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=parking en pr&eacut... commented 2026-06-07 15:12:03 UTC by Yunan973 ♦120 |
| 183769847 (Comments: 1) | Lulucmy (Discussed changesets: 7) | fix: Sallagriffon et non Blausasc commented 2026-06-07 09:11:08 UTC by Lulucmy ♦9 |
| 183677419 (Comments: 2) | SNT_IND_Meudon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, C’est bien noté commented 2026-06-07 08:09:36 UTC by SNT_IND_Meudon ♦1 |
| 183699344 (Comments: 2) | cwrff (Discussed changesets: 2) | Correction effectuée. Je n'avais effectivement pas chargé les relations "bus", et n'avais pas compris l'avertissement de JOSM. C'est plus clair maintenant ! Avec mes excuses. commented 2026-06-07 07:18:26 UTC by cwrff ♦2 |
| 183720438 (Comments: 1) | Olyon (Discussed changesets: 167) | Bonsoir, Dans cette opération nettoyage, l'attribut highway = bus_stop sur des public_transport = stop_position est aussi superflu. Je me trompe ? Marc commented 2026-06-06 18:37:29 UTC by mga_geo ♦308 |
| 183713070 (Comments: 3) | GilB (Discussed changesets: 6) | J'ai corrigé commented 2026-06-06 13:04:48 UTC by GilB ♦44 |