| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 179065306 (Comments: 2) | KayleeDevlin (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Should be fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179122876 commented 2026-03-06 05:33:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,144 |
| 179036016 (Comments: 5) | RJ Lerng (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah sorry.. Here it is: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel:* commented 2026-03-05 19:41:18 UTC by mueschel ♦6,941 |
| 179284064 (Comments: 2) | B Sai Deepthi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Apologies for the mistake. I have reverted the edit. Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will be more careful when editing the existing data in the future. Thank You, B Sai Deepthi commented 2026-03-05 10:17:01 UTC by B Sai Deepthi ♦3 |
| 179386204 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 39) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout is an appropriate tag for roundabouts, you don't need to tag oneway=yes with that as well commented 2026-03-05 09:27:23 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦81 |
| 158890584 (Comments: 3) | BlumleinPear (Discussed changesets: 7) | So did I, but it seems I missed a section. commented 2026-03-05 07:47:13 UTC by Luen Warneke ♦23 |
| 179290881 (Comments: 1) | aussiegeek (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, I noticed that osmi shows this https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=141.38437&lat=-37.85219&zoom=14 I have been unable to find the link to download the dataset used and most forest datasets I found were old. Can yo... commented 2026-03-05 00:29:39 UTC by nevw ♦2,160 |
| 179372017 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 39) | The changeset description is supposed to say Glen Waverley Line track ways, not Pakenham Line track ways. commented 2026-03-04 22:51:29 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦28 |
| 178803105 (Comments: 5) | Premium Glass & Aluminium (Discussed changesets: 2) | Also, source is Google Maps which is strictly prohibited per OSM policy. Reported to DWG. commented 2026-03-04 06:10:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦87 |
| 59353503 (Comments: 2) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 110) | Short answer yes: https://parks.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/165710/bingera.pdf commented 2026-03-04 05:05:08 UTC by TheSwavu ♦608 |
| 91734873 (Comments: 1) | eneerhut (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, Why have you marked Charters Towers Aerodrome as military? It was constructed for military purposes .. but now? Looks like it is controlled by hte local council - they collect landing fees & charges... https://www.charterstower... commented 2026-03-04 04:33:05 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,760 |
| 106895639 (Comments: 1) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 299) | Hi, Issue with Relation: Bingera Conservation Park 1 (1506713)... This looks to be a gliders airfield - North Gregory/Elliott Field https://www.pilotnav.com/airport/YETT Primarily used by https://gliding.inbundy.com.au/gliding/ <... commented 2026-03-04 03:54:59 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,760 |
| 179330035 (Comments: 1) | Warin61 (Discussed changesets: 161) | Changeset comment should be Add Caboolture Gliding Club. Add some buildings, fences. Expand parking from node to area. commented 2026-03-04 03:05:00 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,760 |
| 178929237 (Comments: 2) | oneclickdigital (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314290 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-03-03 17:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,230 |
| 179298675 (Comments: 1) | Zoozoo Printing Highett (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-03 12:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,866 |
| 179286180 (Comments: 1) | Zoozoo Printing Highett (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-03 06:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦5,866 |
| 179279965 (Comments: 3) | DavidM3260 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Both the Twelve Apostles Trail relalation and Poorpa Yanyeen Meerreeng trail may benefit from the addition of some of the name variants listed on our Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name commented 2026-03-03 02:48:18 UTC by nevw ♦2,160 |
| 178753942 (Comments: 1) | Ethan Colley (Discussed changesets: 22) | It looks like this change has updated the map based on outdated aerial imagery, undoing recent changes from surveying. commented 2026-03-03 00:34:06 UTC by kimo ♦28 |
| 83194530 (Comments: 1) | Aalbers69 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi, Should not the interval be on the ferry route relations not on the individual segments? Some segments are used by different routes.. thus could be confusing??? commented 2026-03-02 23:50:52 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,760 |
| 132822631 (Comments: 2) | cleary (Discussed changesets: 44) | It is obviously incorrect. I do not recall what I might have intended at the time so I have deleted the wetland key for that way. Thanks for identifying the problem and bringing it to my attention. commented 2026-03-02 21:53:50 UTC by cleary ♦57 |
| 179252758 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 140) | *painted commented 2026-03-02 12:41:07 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦456 |
| 179241406 (Comments: 1) | nevw (Discussed changesets: 110) | Revert of 179229869 commented 2026-03-02 11:30:38 UTC by MappingMore ♦117 |
| 179229869 (Comments: 2) | leah-L (Discussed changesets: 1) | no response so I have reverted this changeset that deleted extensive mapping. No reason given for deletions. commented 2026-03-02 08:14:47 UTC by nevw ♦2,160 |
| 179231863 (Comments: 2) | [a-C*]Wyatt2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179231863#map=19/-37.676371/144.446682 commented 2026-03-02 05:18:28 UTC by nevw ♦2,160 |
| 179064122 (Comments: 2) | B Sai Deepthi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you, B Sai Deepthi commented 2026-03-02 01:29:52 UTC by B Sai Deepthi ♦3 |
| 179199491 (Comments: 3) | theentireworldtomap (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revert edit made with outdated imagery to restore the roundabout that now exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179232515 commented 2026-03-02 01:05:48 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,488 |
| 179110148 (Comments: 3) | knarlyhurricane (Discussed changesets: 2) | They're not needed in Australia, as we have full mapping of those as relations and those are used when geocoding. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179110148 commented 2026-03-01 22:32:13 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,488 |
| 178313852 (Comments: 1) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Similarly, these would be better as driveways than generic service roads commented 2026-03-01 02:41:24 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦153 |
| 179060567 (Comments: 1) | GIS MCC (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hiya, layer=1 on the garage is wrong, it should be drawn as to not overlap with the house commented 2026-03-01 02:35:42 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦153 |
| 179149991 (Comments: 1) | thebeastmodo1 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hiya - this would be better marked as a driveway commented 2026-03-01 02:32:07 UTC by ScottWalkerAU ♦153 |
| 177795884 (Comments: 1) | snippet (Discussed changesets: 4) | Just letting you know I recently https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178405682 removed the path tag. It was a path once, but is now abandoned and revegetated commented 2026-02-28 10:48:46 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 161188857 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | 37120625 maxspeed correct at western end, haven't checked the rest commented 2026-02-28 10:43:28 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 131590920 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 1134422226, 803274794, 187919554, 1101389172 maxspeed correct 132605108 maxspeed correct (didn't check 132605107). 498183594 previously surveyed maxspeed 60, you changed to 100, survey Nov 2025 confirmed maxspeed 60 476432064 maxspeed 5... commented 2026-02-28 10:37:41 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 133960071 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 10:26:50 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 131630395 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 4298725 maxspeed correct 1000969102 not checked commented 2026-02-28 10:21:12 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 119689104 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | This section of highway is still maxspeed 50. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178527132 commented 2026-02-28 09:58:46 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 157648985 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 09:49:53 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 157648867 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | Maxspeed correct for 22729556 (apart from northern end, part of 80 zone for 1322381000) 1322380999 is maxspeed 80, apart from northern end (50) (not 100) 644933368 maxspeed 80 644933367 eastern end 80, remainder correct 644933369 correct<... commented 2026-02-28 09:47:27 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 161294089 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 09:31:35 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 134003855 (Comments: 2) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Resurveyed Nov 2025 - definitely still maxspeed 40 for 95705823, 387687426, 96095197. Other roads previously maxspeed 20 has since been reduced to maxspeed 10. Updated at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178261553 commented 2026-02-28 08:34:48 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 146881278 (Comments: 3) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Resurveyed Nov 2025 - definitely still maxspeed 20 for this driveway commented 2026-02-28 08:29:47 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 118529041 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 08:27:55 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 129985322 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 534731418, 548708178 maxspeed correct Ramps not surveyed Nov 2025, but likely to reduce speed at top part of ramp commented 2026-02-28 08:26:54 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 135280232 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 293705778 - northern past maxspeed 60, southern part maxspeed 80. Updated at www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176738803 443028968 likely to be 80, but I didn't survey southern end so I've left this alone. I also didn't survey 4430289... commented 2026-02-28 08:22:50 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 131357003 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | I've left these maxspeeds alone. At survey Nov 2025 was part of construction site for Coffs Harbour Bypass, maxspeeds will need reviewing after bypass opens. commented 2026-02-28 08:16:42 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 178650767 (Comments: 4) | RJ Lerng (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK, I will delete the tag from the node. Thanks for your input! RJ commented 2026-02-28 08:10:58 UTC by RJ Lerng ♦2 |
| 146011785 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Nancy Bird Walton Drive: maxspeed 50 986835176 (not 80), 1237939580 (not 60). 697181012 and 697181014 northern halves 80 (not 60), southern halves 50 (not 60) 697181013 maxspeed correct Exit ramp 608018806 maxspeed 110 (not 100) Ocean ... commented 2026-02-28 08:04:37 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 128460517 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | No maxspeed sign seen for ways 85480771, 321445116, 443174872, 443174873, 85396895 - previously surveyed as maxspeed 50, but as I can't confirm I've left maxspeed alone. I've left roundabout 85396903 alone as well commented 2026-02-28 07:36:08 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 128459223 (Comments: 2) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 85386175, 1044377931 (Muldoon Street) previously surveyed maxspeed 50, you changed to 60. Survey Nov 2025 confirms maxspeed 50. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176262329 No maxspeed signs seen for 85386161, 85480779, 1044377933, 1... commented 2026-02-28 07:26:44 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 128459033 (Comments: 2) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Maxspeed 50 (not 60) for Oxley Street (443174274, 85396893, 443174275) and Cowper Street (85396898, 443174271, 443174276) Roundabout 85396892 maxspeed 50 Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176262329 commented 2026-02-28 07:19:35 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 125637651 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 386410347 maxspeed correct 115306154 no maxspeed sign at survey Nov 2025 so unable to confirm maxspeed. commented 2026-02-28 06:51:25 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 130229132 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 260047151 maxspeed previous 90, you changed to 100. Survey Nov 2025 confirmed maxspeed 90. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176262329 Way 1123238714 maxspeed 110 correct Change of maxspeed between these two is a little to north.... commented 2026-02-28 06:42:53 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 125681543 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Way 170055592, 170055915, 170055917, previously surveyed as 50, you changed to 60, survey Nov 2025 confirms maxspeed is 50. Way 170055414 (roundabout) maxspeed is 50 (not 60) Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179007813 Ways 17... commented 2026-02-28 06:30:45 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 131589434 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 06:11:19 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 130269392 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct, although location of change of maxspeed is a little further north (updated at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179007813) commented 2026-02-28 06:08:24 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 129724207 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | Malpas Street (New England Highway) - previously surveyed as maxspeed 50, you changed to 70. Survey Nov 2025 confirms maxspeed is 50. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176165200 (ways 98290444, 628566415, 762382437, 762382439, 76238244... commented 2026-02-28 06:02:00 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 140826187 (Comments: 1) | Harsimranjit Kaur (Discussed changesets: 106) | 532653326- maxspeed correct 597879545 - only northern section is maxspeed 80, remainder is maxspeed 100. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178527132 commented 2026-02-28 05:46:52 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 161327815 (Comments: 1) | Nova Systems GAP (Discussed changesets: 35) | Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey) commented 2026-02-28 05:25:38 UTC by mrpulley ♦262 |
| 177923442 (Comments: 4) | Tomaussie_17 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Tomaussie, I definitely understand where you are coming from. There seems to be some anomalies in the road/path design vs signage of the same. In the Kingston and Greater Dandenong areas there are a number of areas where a wider and... commented 2026-02-28 02:53:02 UTC by HighRouleur ♦67 |
| 179118372 (Comments: 1) | [a-C*]Wyatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OSM! The multipolygon grass relation is in error ... the outer ways cannot share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.57355&lat=-37.70232&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standar... commented 2026-02-27 23:52:43 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,760 |