| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 167875212 (Comments: 3) | martin hamel (Discussed changesets: 6) | ok, je vais mettre bicycle=dismount Merci! commented 2025-06-21 17:49:34 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦337 |
| 167836543 (Comments: 6) | Manuel19982 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Morning, the routing appears not to be impacting or causing issues, as far as I can tell. We can easily revert the changes if necessary. My submission was made to review it, so if anyone feels the change is too significant, we can revert it i... commented 2025-06-21 16:51:19 UTC by Manuel19982 ♦1 |
| 167592511 (Comments: 3) | Hypsometric (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ah I see now that the access=yes tag is newer, thanks. ... although all roads leading to here are access=private... ah well commented 2025-06-20 15:07:50 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦320 |
| 167846177 (Comments: 4) | iAmFromZeQuebec (Discussed changesets: 1) | OK, no problem. In the wiki, it says access=yes is implicit, but can be added for more precise information. Thanks! commented 2025-06-20 11:33:58 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦337 |
| 167846580 (Comments: 1) | meisoof (Discussed changesets: 8) | *foot path commented 2025-06-19 22:04:50 UTC by meisoof ♦5 |
| 167840006 (Comments: 1) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 46) | OSM policy for names is to use the name that is used locally (but with a preference for signed names). Both names are signed in this case but the more locally used name is likely to be the English language name. Currently, there are under 1,00... commented 2025-06-19 18:24:18 UTC by eerib ♦100 |
| 167692530 (Comments: 2) | GreyCountyGIS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, this account is managed by Grey County GIS staff. We are updating road information on OSM from authoritative road data. Grey County GIS has chosen to support the OSM platform and will be updating road information moving forward. commented 2025-06-19 14:59:24 UTC by GreyCountyGIS ♦1 |
| 167760803 (Comments: 3) | Bistromath (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yes. This is a highway on-ramp like on the other side of Autoroute Felix-Leclerc commented 2025-06-19 01:21:40 UTC by Bistromath ♦3 |
| 167459930 (Comments: 1) | NorwayHouseMap (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi NorwayHouseMap, I had a question about the edits you made in this area. Is this the preferred naming schema for address information in this area? From what I understand the address information is its own tagging scheme. Looking forwa... commented 2025-06-18 16:12:31 UTC by AntSom ♦3 |
| 167740375 (Comments: 7) | Lenuji (Discussed changesets: 1) | Au plaisir! commented 2025-06-18 13:42:42 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦337 |
| 165636343 (Comments: 3) | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2025-06-17 11:51:16 UTC by NumisK ♦8 |
| 162990157 (Comments: 1) | Ji Li (Discussed changesets: 3) | This was already mapped [here](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12512826096) in the correct location. I'll move the non-duplicated tags over and delete this node. commented 2025-06-16 12:18:08 UTC by Nate Wessel ♦59 |
| 167670220 (Comments: 1) | maximum_stressdynamic_pressure (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, nice job mapping up in Richmond Hill! Just wanted to mention that postal codes of buildings and other points are more commonly tagged as addr:postcode=*. postal_code=* is more commonly used for tagging streets or towns in cases where a wh... commented 2025-06-16 02:19:19 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦320 |
| 167669412 (Comments: 1) | Valérie Tardif (Discussed changesets: 5) | Comment should have been: adjusted building geometry, placed addresses and entrances, adjusted access restrictions commented 2025-06-15 22:12:58 UTC by Valérie Tardif ♦4 |
| 120981080 (Comments: 1) | Hack-o-lantern (Discussed changesets: 13) | FYI, this added building parts (cool) for Regal Road Public School, but didn't include a building so nothing actually rendered. Building parts must live within a building! :) Have fixed this for this building. commented 2025-06-15 19:45:40 UTC by Shrinks99 ♦13 |
| 167566335 (Comments: 1) | eyw27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, can you comment why you upgraded this section of road? commented 2025-06-15 15:30:34 UTC by Jarek 🚲 ♦320 |
| 167536040 (Comments: 2) | Fabe56 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hi, I'm not sure about this! On the west side of Sherbrooke Street, the infrastructure not suggest any crossing possibility (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=772056961680333&focus=photo&lat=45.5497828&lng=-73.5549653&z=17&... commented 2025-06-15 14:20:58 UTC by Fabe56 ♦43 |
| 48870128 (Comments: 1) | stevens (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806417 ? Have you since been there? I bet that it is not existing anymore, maybe you are capable of checking this? commented 2025-06-15 07:41:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,564 |