| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 183318863 (Comments: 2) | AhtiVasser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tänan tähelepanu eest. Alguses programm andis punast, et peab suuna märkima ning ei lasknud salvestada kui tee ei jõudnud kuskile välja. Nüüd sain teha paranduse ja on üks tee. commented 2026-05-30 12:25:43 UTC by AhtiVasser ♦1 |
| 183222439 (Comments: 5) | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (Discussed changesets: 22) | Also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk commented 2026-05-28 07:23:26 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 182739604 (Comments: 3) | fghj753 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Those tiny signs are not in the law either. Cycling prohibited sign cannot be inside other sign and there is no human depicted on the real sign. To be accurate, only custom signs which explain, but not change the meaning of normal signs, are ... commented 2026-05-27 06:37:22 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183169995 (Comments: 3) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 4) | This one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221389917/history I've already changed it back. Also removed oneway from here as you don't have to ride on the narrow bicycle path there, the area is wider and allows to support routing ... commented 2026-05-26 19:18:23 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 181604021 (Comments: 1) | raivov (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, maxima, selver, prisma, etc. are supermarkets. This is a specialized shop. Maybe shop=houseware or shop=trade + trade=baking_equipment commented 2026-05-26 18:59:07 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 181627778 (Comments: 1) | KRISTO IVANOV (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this building is not a dentist's. To add a dentist clinic, you need to add separate node inside the building, like the restaurant in the same building. commented 2026-05-26 18:50:42 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 181194865 (Comments: 1) | mmett (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don't change path into cycleway for bicycle pedestrians paths. Path is proffered and accepted way to map them for many mappers. commented 2026-05-26 18:40:11 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183093430 (Comments: 1) | Chris Kerr (Discussed changesets: 6) | Strange. I've seen water tap here last year. commented 2026-05-26 18:21:22 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 181786891 (Comments: 1) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 4) | Name is to be used for street names. Do not use it just to display some label on the map. You can add it to description tag. commented 2026-05-26 18:16:16 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 183122554 (Comments: 1) | Raio Rene (Discussed changesets: 4) | Something is wrong here. oneway:bicycle=yes and cycleway:left=opposite seem to be in conflict. cycleway=opposite is also deprecated. Please check out "Contraflow lanes" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopp... commented 2026-05-26 18:14:36 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 25463201 (Comments: 1) | Tormi (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, is this some kind of official route or a route your personally invented? Can't find any information about it. commented 2026-05-26 17:31:54 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 176813917 (Comments: 2) | Meeliz (Discussed changesets: 3) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183174685 commented 2026-05-25 19:44:30 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 181471642 (Comments: 6) | Zverik (Discussed changesets: 75) | I was more concerned about it being a highway=footway. But now that you mention it, it is segregated, no doubt about it. Truly physical segregation would allow to map it as two paths. Of course, dark red asphalt for bicycles or cobble... commented 2026-05-25 17:29:41 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 181218978 (Comments: 2) | RRJest (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183127046 commented 2026-05-24 20:57:25 UTC by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 |
| 171552988 (Comments: 1) | Jan Mathys (Discussed changesets: 26) | Please note that place name Vana-Antsla stands for the entire settlement (relation/352485), not only the more compact centre mapped as residential area that misleadingly got this name here. commented 2026-05-24 16:50:26 UTC by Pikse ♦236 |
| 165496517 (Comments: 3) | fedoroff net (Discussed changesets: 22) | There actually already were two objects with village name, the other one being node/1973428366 at the village centre. This can be searched for, too. Landuse carrying this name on the other hand is misleading, as this is simply the wrong area.<... commented 2026-05-24 15:38:13 UTC by Pikse ♦236 |