| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168410328 by Alan Bragg @ 2025-07-02 17:21 | 1 | 2025-07-25 09:53 | Palina Markina ♦2 | Hi, Alan Bragg!We noticed your recent edit where you changed part of South Road (Way 412553864) from `highway=tertiary` to `highway=footway`.We were wondering if you could kindly share any sources or local knowledge that informed this update? Based on currently available open data in OSM —... |
| 2 | 2025-07-25 15:56 | Alan Bragg | Hi Palina, Thanks for finding my obvious mistake. I've made the correcton.Alan | |
| 127260324 by Alan Bragg @ 2022-10-09 17:24 | 1 | 2025-06-21 00:49 | gdt ♦44 | This is a bench with name=Amenity. I didn't see any bench names today. ok to assume that's a mistake in tagging and clean it up? |
| 2 | 2025-07-08 16:33 | gdt ♦44 | name dropped, nevermind | |
| 133414136 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-03-07 18:23 | 1 | 2025-05-03 15:06 | OddlyAngled ♦109 | I noticed there are two fairly similar hiking routes - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9338492 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15569997should these be combined or are they distinct? |
| 137804419 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-06-26 18:31 | 1 | 2024-07-19 00:05 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,089 | addresses shouldn't be added to roads |
| 149494509 by Alan Bragg @ 2024-04-02 18:32 | 1 | 2024-04-03 12:01 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi there,Why did you delete this road? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/16940970 |
| 2 | 2024-04-03 13:49 | Alan Bragg | My mistake. Confused by boundary being same as road. Corrected. Thanks for pointing out the error. | |
| 132628666 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-02-16 13:03 | 1 | 2024-03-13 12:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,960 | Hello!You usedreservation=noneon https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669764294/historyHave you maybe meantreservation=no?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you use... |
| 132556771 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-02-14 22:10 | 1 | 2024-03-13 12:35 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,960 | Hello!You usedreservation=noneon https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10659812485/historyHave you maybe meantreservation=no?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you use... |
| 147337100 by Alan Bragg @ 2024-02-11 17:41 | 1 | 2024-02-12 12:23 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi there,You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249177788 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
| 138786624 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-07-20 22:27 | 1 | 2023-07-24 11:03 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,Why do all of the nodes of the campsite have "ele=0.0" tags? |
| 130307846 by Alan Bragg @ 2022-12-20 22:22 | 1 | 2023-07-22 05:40 | b-jazz ♦715 | The name of this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123750989) isn't really "Road Closed", right? I was going to delete the tag or change it to something more appropriate, but I wanted to check with you first. |
| 136885113 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-06-02 21:48 | 1 | 2023-06-04 17:18 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178452585 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks! |
| 136429454 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-05-22 20:29 | 1 | 2023-05-25 16:52 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,You created two ways with no tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175172260 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175172257Could you please go back and tag them? Thanks! |
| 134869116 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-04-13 15:59 | 1 | 2023-04-15 12:24 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,You created a way with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1162142587 could you please fix it? Thanks! |
| 134707208 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-04-10 00:16 | 1 | 2023-04-10 09:28 | user_5359 ♦19,787 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844409976/history. What is the meaning of the tag FR=86? |
| 134694909 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-04-09 16:13 | 1 | 2023-04-10 08:35 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,You added a way with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160881698Can you please go back and add tags? Thanks! |
| 134144649 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-03-26 16:56 | 1 | 2023-03-27 20:00 | Hufkratzer ♦787 | Hi,I don't know what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157463346 is, but it doesn't look like a riding centre and maybe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/valhikes/diary/401189 (mentioned in weeklyOSM 661) can inspire you. |
| 134139566 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-03-26 14:45 | 1 | 2023-03-27 11:11 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,You created two ways with no tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157432939 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157432938Would you mind going back and tagging these? Thanks! |
| 133802444 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-03-17 19:44 | 1 | 2023-03-18 14:21 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,Looks like you left this way unclosed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155101809 at this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10742234872Would you mind fixing that? Thanks! |
| 120561052 by Alan Bragg @ 2022-05-04 21:03 | 1 | 2023-03-14 00:46 | BubbaJuice ♦129 | Don't add buildings that don't exist. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1057418851 |
| 133341952 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-03-05 21:52 | 1 | 2023-03-07 12:01 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,Looks like you added a way with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151631149Would you mind taking a look and adding tags to it? Thanks! |
| 133146101 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-02-28 20:53 | 1 | 2023-03-05 07:30 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,089 | amenity=toilet is for the feature tagging the toilet itself not whether a feature has one. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133146101 |
| 2 | 2023-03-06 01:02 | Alan Bragg | I believe this is correctly tagged. It building is a typical forest service toilet. There is nothing else in the building. | |
| 3 | 2023-03-06 01:55 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,089 | The tag is on the whole park | |
| 4 | 2023-03-06 03:23 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,089 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325284266 | |
| 5 | 2023-03-06 13:19 | Alan Bragg | OK, deleted the tag. Thanks | |
| 133289249 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-03-04 13:09 | 1 | 2023-03-06 12:32 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,Looks like you accidentally created a way with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151213579Would you mind fixing this? Thanks! |
| 131967755 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-02-01 15:19 | 1 | 2023-03-01 13:19 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,You created this way with no tags, could you please tag it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137010388#map=18/33.87281/-112.09544Thanks! |
| 2 | 2023-03-01 13:19 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Also this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137010398 | |
| 3 | 2023-03-01 13:20 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | and also this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137010397 | |
| 132013917 by Alan Bragg @ 2023-02-02 18:12 | 1 | 2023-03-01 13:18 | emersonveenstra ♦1,462 | Hi,You created this way with no tags, can you please tag it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137326358Thanks! |
| 35348544 by Alan Bragg @ 2015-11-16 11:40 | 1 | 2023-02-15 21:44 | Antonin Del Fabbro ♦310 | Hi Alan!What are your thoughts about this edit nowdays ?Thanks! |
| 2 | 2023-02-16 14:30 | Alan Bragg | I removed the pitch inside the pitch since the sports center was for soccer. I don't see a way to make separate pitches for the multiple overlapping fields. | |
| 3 | 2023-02-16 14:38 | Antonin Del Fabbro ♦310 | Alright, thank you! | |
| 130730771 by Alan Bragg @ 2022-12-31 18:27 | 1 | 2023-01-01 03:31 | MxxCon ♦3,360 | Hello.As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptionsname field must not be used as a description, which is exactly what you did in most of the edits here. Please correct these problems, else this edit is going to be reverted. --- ... |
| 48100208 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-04-24 19:04 | 1 | 2022-11-08 11:19 | user_5359 ♦19,787 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/211982490/history. Did you really need on the foreign OSM keys? What is the meaning of this tags?BLDG_USE=RESIDENTIALGlobalID={E42D0618-CEE2-43AB-8EE6-F1398315C73E}NEAR_DIST=37.70422227NEAR_FID=18632OBJECTID=18723RuleID=1SHAPE_area=2... |
| 2 | 2022-11-08 12:15 | Alan Bragg | I don't remember. They are not necessary. | |
| 123988239 by Alan Bragg @ 2022-07-23 19:40 | 1 | 2022-07-24 17:57 | MxxCon ♦3,360 | What does it mean "tracks and streams"? This comment doesn't help others understand what you are editing here, especially considering your changeset bbox is spawning most of US |
| 2 | 2022-07-25 15:41 | bradrh ♦66 | Agree with MxxCon. changeset is too big, and comment is vague. | |
| 3 | 2022-07-25 16:05 | Alan Bragg | I agree with both comments. The changeset includes streams and tracks that were traced in a small section of a Sitgraeves NF in Arizona and a minor node change on Cape Cod, MA. Should have used a second changeset. I appologize. | |
| 4 | 2022-07-25 16:20 | bradrh ♦66 | :) | |
| 88532077 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-07-26 20:37 | 1 | 2021-10-25 01:34 | TomPar ♦123 | Hi Alan. Is this specific route referenced somewhere? Is there a reason this point-to-point was put in? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2021-10-25 10:35 | Alan Bragg | Hi Tom, Nice to hear from you. See https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11351528&map=15!42.3949!-71.3365It is a nice walk I recommend to friends. Parking at both ends makes it an nice route over several properties. I especially like the boardwalk at different times of the year. Ala... | |
| 3 | 2021-10-25 20:47 | TomPar ♦123 | Yes, my family and I were there this weekend. We particularly liked the pastoral field views from Lincoln Road. Amazing fall colors and sun! I asked my question imprecisely: I meant if this was an established route published in some trail guide by a land manager, etc. No matter either way. Tha... | |
| 102184864 by Alan Bragg @ 2021-04-02 10:32 | 1 | 2021-04-02 12:39 | SherbetS ♦155 | hi, please use the tag man_made=mast + tower:type=communication for communications masts. |
| 95449363 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-12-07 22:58 | 1 | 2020-12-08 00:15 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11499611 has a fun zig zag on it's western end. |
| 2 | 2020-12-08 01:47 | Alan Bragg | Thanks, fixed it. | |
| 94456643 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-11-19 19:07 | 1 | 2020-12-02 00:01 | Korgi1 ♦42 | is the name "Dick Ford Road" correct? |
| 2 | 2020-12-05 16:19 | Alan Bragg | Yes. It's in the state enhanced 911 emergency database. That's where you'd go to rescue someone. Driveways are often named after their owners in Maine | |
| 3 | 2020-12-06 03:38 | Korgi1 ♦42 | Alright no problem. It just showed up as "suspicious" due to profanity in the name. | |
| 95150293 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-12-02 10:58 | 1 | 2020-12-02 22:57 | Alan Bragg | Recognized error of my ways and reverted changeset. My bad, sorry. Good lesson in using revert plug-in. My excuse: moving josm to a new computer and hadn't got all the settings correct and accidentally uploaded file. --- Published using OSMCha: https://os... |
| 94728983 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-11-24 20:45 | 1 | 2020-12-01 17:29 | vorpalblade-kaart ♦21 | Did you intend to delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449879791? It is still visible on all publicly available imagery. And the deletion definitely does not match your changeset comment.If you did intend to delete the way, it would have been nice to know why (e.g., the road was razed/demoli... |
| 2 | 2020-12-01 19:08 | Alan Bragg | Good catch. That was an accident. Surprises me because I usually catch something like that with JOSM validation indicating that there were other unconnected ways in the area. I've been working on updating Maine roads for many months and have touched thousands of roads that are misnamed, misalig... | |
| 3 | 2020-12-01 19:37 | vorpalblade-kaart ♦21 | No problem. I thought it was probably accidental, but it might not have been. You are a bit more local than I am, after all.I don't know if you are going to revert the deletions, or just redraw the road, but either way, good luck, and have fun. :) | |
| 60711583 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-07-14 12:56 | 1 | 2020-11-22 23:33 | TomPar ♦123 | Hi Alan. I see you added nature_reserve to way 35261320 (across the street south side from Whipple Hill). However, this looks private to me on Lexington GIS. Do you have any more details on this parcel and the trail? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2020-11-23 14:01 | Alan Bragg | I have no details. I was probably aligning the property boundary to the latest MassGIS L3 Parcels. The way was originally entered by Tim BL in 2009 along with the path. Feel free to update anything I have mapped if you have new information. | |
| 87996880 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-07-14 20:54 | 1 | 2020-10-12 05:15 | Ryan Teksten ♦1 | There is no path. Access is posted as trespassing. Remove this ‘bushwhacked path.’ In its entirety. All trespassers will be prosecuted. |
| 2 | 2020-10-12 11:27 | Alan Bragg | removed trail | |
| 90466097 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-09-05 23:07 | 1 | 2020-09-21 06:45 | General Updating ♦6 | Hi Alan,was it intentional to delete Loring Airport at https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/815655014 ? |
| 2 | 2020-09-21 16:57 | Alan Bragg | Thanks for catching that mistake. I see that you've already re-instated the airport. Today I deleted the description describing it as and Air Force Base. | |
| 87308406 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-06-29 18:11 | 1 | 2020-07-03 01:22 | b-jazz ♦715 | Hey Alan, can you take another look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29795501? Several nodes got deleted and now the polygon is a figure eight, which I'm guessing isn't what what intended. |
| 2 | 2020-07-03 19:13 | Alan Bragg | Ooops! Fixed it. Thanks for notifying me. | |
| 86426635 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-06-09 20:58 | 1 | 2020-06-09 21:42 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Is there any way to filter out the source tags? Do you see any value in having them? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86426635 |
| 2 | 2020-06-09 22:58 | Alan Bragg | The source tags are generated by MapWithAI and may help us know where the data came from as we continue to fix Maine. The could be deleted when we're done. I'm no fan of extra tags. | |
| 86017339 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-05-31 18:24 | 1 | 2020-06-08 21:28 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | I'm curious why you're adding tiger tags to the roads you're adding. Like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810024756 |
| 85982399 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-05-30 13:45 | 1 | 2020-05-30 21:04 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | I'm starting to pay attention to state roads now. You put "ref=15" on WAY: 11445969 and WAY: 11440222, I think we want "ref=ME 15" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85982399 |
| 2 | 2020-05-30 21:04 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Oh, same with way 11445996 and way 284176053 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85982399 | |
| 3 | 2020-05-30 21:06 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Oh, I just found more of the same further north. I really should look at the whole thing before I comment at all. | |
| 85782607 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-05-26 17:35 | 1 | 2020-05-27 01:50 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | looks like you meant to put ref=ME 166 on a way, but it ended up on NODE: 7480246646 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85782607 |
| 2 | 2020-05-27 12:07 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85831475 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85782607 | |
| 3 | 2020-05-27 12:20 | Alan Bragg | Thanks for catching that. I'm surprised the JOSM validator didn't warn me. Or, maybe it did! I liked the slack discussion about ref= and relations. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85782607 | |
| 85715820 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-05-25 11:40 | 1 | 2020-05-25 17:02 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Hm... you removed WAY: 800664256 and the addresses around it. If I look at newer imagery it looks like this road and buildings (most of them) exist (or soon will). I'm not experienced at reverting parts of changeset so I'm hesitant to try. If you have time, could you give it a go? ... |
| 2 | 2020-05-25 18:13 | Alan Bragg | I looked at those buildings in the best imagery I could find them. I double checked google also. That's the best I can do to from an arm chair. Reverting the change will destroy a lot of new mapping of the school area so I'm reluctant. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-25 18:17 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Thanks for taking a look. I thought it might be easy. Is fine. | |
| 84701150 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-05-05 14:19 | 1 | 2020-05-19 01:46 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Looks like removal of highway tag was an oopsy. fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85408207 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84701150 |
| 84709228 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-05-05 16:50 | 1 | 2020-05-19 01:38 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | It looks like removing the highway tag from way 44633980 was a mistake.fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85408069 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84709228 |
| 82931910 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-04-01 15:29 | 1 | 2020-04-15 15:13 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | You changed some addr:street from "Pleasant Street" to "Pleasant Avenue", but looking at a street sign, I think this is ST.https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=43.466768~-70.794889&lvl=17&dir=244.897&style=x&v=2&sV=1Example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/... |
| 2 | 2020-04-15 15:21 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Oooo, looks like you were trying to fix the neighborhood around (way/740402612), but you did a global replace and caught a much larger street in the change.More visible herehttps://osmcha.org/changesets/82931910/ | |
| 3 | 2020-04-15 15:33 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | Ouch, the change effected Kennebunkportnode/7157342166node/7157342170node/7157342612 | |
| 4 | 2020-04-15 15:58 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | I fixed in https://osmcha.org/changesets/83601480/ | |
| 83080746 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-04-04 19:02 | 1 | 2020-04-04 19:26 | Alan Bragg | My bad. Changeset is being reverted. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83080746 |
| 82437109 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-03-20 15:11 | 1 | 2020-03-20 18:53 | user_5359 ♦19,787 | Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags LCITY=T10 Sd BppLCOUNTY=HancockMAP_LABEL=Blacks Woods Rd - Route 182in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 20:32 | Alan Bragg | Yes, This all is an inadvertent upload that I am currently removing. Sorry, I screwed up. | |
| 41790546 by Alan Bragg @ 2016-08-29 23:31 | 1 | 2020-02-11 23:54 | marc__marc ♦1,274 | Hello,you added 12 objetcs around Nesowadnehunk Field Campgroundhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935432https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374899387https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935434https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374935436https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/437493542... |
| 79485931 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-01-12 19:51 | 1 | 2020-01-13 02:58 | freebeer ♦1,598 | hola alan,i see a weirdness in the map rendering, a discontinuity that when investigated shows a line attempting to represent a bollard that is not rendered (should be a point along the way) as well as a discontinuity along the way.a bollard does not imply a road break, quite the opposite, a... |
| 2 | 2020-01-13 19:12 | Alan Bragg | Interesting. Whats on the ground is a line of about 15 boulders creating a wall with a space for pedestrians on the east side. The road is none existent. I re-mapped the area with a path, the sidewalk connections, fire hydrant and bike rack. | |
| 75120142 by Alan Bragg @ 2019-09-30 21:00 | 1 | 2019-10-01 03:56 | Andre68 ♦88 | Please keep coastlines consistent! They may not overlap neither have open ends. And the position of the line is position of high tide. A pretty good description of this is at the german wiki page of natural=coastline. Since it seems that you think, that my correction was not good I will not correct ... |
| 72488028 by Alan Bragg @ 2019-07-21 17:40 | 1 | 2019-08-26 15:08 | Yury Yatsynovich ♦115 | Hi, Alan!A quick note: in this changeset you, somehow, added "building=yes" not only to buildings, but also to points.I guessm to avoid this one needs to "unselect nodes" before adding tags to ways. |
| 2 | 2019-08-26 15:37 | Yury Yatsynovich ♦115 | I've just corrected it.1. Dowloaded the changeset in JOSM: use File -> Open Location and paste the changeset URL e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72488028 2. Selected all buildings (Ctrl+F, "building")3. Selected only nodes (Ctr+Shft+N)4. Deleted tags from nodes | |
| 72181267 by Alan Bragg @ 2019-07-12 13:28 | 1 | 2019-07-17 03:40 | freebeer ♦1,598 | servus,can i ask you to take a close look at the southeast end of this changeset at https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=72181267 ?it looks like something has gone horribly wrong down there, with self-intersections and overlaps and i don't know what-all, as i view the raw data po... |
| 2 | 2019-07-17 11:59 | Alan Bragg | Thanks. It's been corrected now. We have a spaghetti bowl of sloppy polygons that were imported 10 years ago for landuse=reservoir_watershed used only in Massachusetts. Makes mapping very difficult.. | |
| 69763109 by Alan Bragg @ 2019-05-01 11:23 | 1 | 2019-05-01 11:26 | Alan Bragg | The changes resulted from investigating orphan ways http://osmoscope.jochentopf.com |
| 68834872 by Alan Bragg @ 2019-04-03 11:53 | 1 | 2019-04-04 10:35 | mueschel ♦6,633 | Hi,these buildings have two strange tags:POINT_TYPE=BMPSTATUS=ACTIVECould you check / remove this?Jan |
| 2 | 2019-04-04 10:50 | Alan Bragg | Jan,Thanks and correctedAlan | |
| 65900746 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-12-30 23:42 | 1 | 2019-01-05 13:29 | freebeer ♦1,598 | hola,looks as if this changeset as visualised by https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=65900746 has had an unwanted effect towards its eastern extent... |
| 2 | 2019-01-06 00:04 | Alan Bragg | You are correct. I fixed it. Thanks | |
| 63732819 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-10-21 17:07 | 1 | 2018-11-18 10:09 | woodpeck ♦2,461 | This is a data import. The OSMUS task manager page clearly says: "You must use a dedicated import account." - please follow the instructions next time. Also, the source you specified ("OpenStreetMap Carto (Standard)") is an error, it should likely be something that points to Micr... |
| 2 | 2018-11-18 10:12 | woodpeck ♦2,461 | Oh sorry, it appears that Bay County data is used for this task. Anyway, check with the task authors for proper attribution. | |
| 64387165 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-11-11 22:30 | 1 | 2018-11-14 11:05 | mueschel ♦6,633 | Hi,it looks like something went wrong here, there are several objects with only foreign tags like this one:http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6053438457 |
| 2 | 2018-11-14 12:04 | Alan Bragg | OOPS! I'll take care of it. Thanks for the comment. | |
| 63710299 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-10-20 17:52 | 1 | 2018-10-21 17:49 | mueschel ♦6,633 | Hi,you added strange tags like "geoid10=120370004" to almost 1000 buildings. Looks like a mistake, could you check that?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-10-21 19:44 | Alan Bragg | Thanks, I'll get direction from project leader. This part of /tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/87#bottom | |
| 59323114 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-05-27 21:59 | 1 | 2018-08-20 11:00 | Petr Fukátko ♦19 | Hello, I would like to ask why have you changed Karakum Desert from natural=desert to natural=sand.According to osm wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsand) deserts should not be tagged like this. |
| 2 | 2018-08-20 22:26 | Alan Bragg | Thanks for the comment. It looked like a sand desert to me. I read the wiki and changed it to natural desert. It looks to me like the polygon needs some work. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-21 05:52 | Petr Fukátko ♦19 | Thank you for changing it back.Hopefuly there will be someone with better data able to refine this polygon. But the information that geographically significant desert is there is valuable nevertheless. | |
| 61664908 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-08-14 17:29 | 1 | 2018-08-15 17:35 | user_5359 ♦19,787 | Hello! You use on node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5832668548 (only as example) the not standard tags COMMUNITY_=WELLFLEETCOUNTY=BARNSTABLEFULL_NUMBE=20GEOGRAPHIC=WELLFLEETOBJECTID=610151PC_NAME=WELLFLEETPOSTCODE=02667STREET_NAM=MOUNTAIN AVENUEcty_town=BARNSTABLE, WELLFLEET... |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 20:05 | Alan Bragg | My mistake. Thanks for the notice. | |
| 61153745 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-07-28 23:48 | 1 | 2018-08-05 01:07 | OceanVortex ♦18 | "Somerville" is spelled with a single "m" |
| 2 | 2018-08-05 01:08 | OceanVortex ♦18 | (For houses on Lowell Street) | |
| 3 | 2018-08-05 12:30 | Alan Bragg | oops! thanks, I'll correct them. I'm trying to convert the few address interpolations in MA before an address import makes things more confusing. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-05 14:51 | Alan Bragg | I think they are all corrected now. Thanks for the changeset comment | |
| 60629414 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-07-11 22:25 | 1 | 2018-07-15 06:04 | user_5359 ♦19,787 | Hello! Please have a short look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607171854: Did you mean name=Jennings Road or name=Hannon Road ? |
| 2 | 2018-07-15 15:41 | Alan Bragg | It's Hannon Road. The name has been added to the street. Nice catch, thanks for commenting | |
| 59679116 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-06-08 21:08 | 1 | 2018-06-10 16:18 | Palolo ♦457 | @Alan Bragg Do you really mean to tag these paths as "Trunk"? |
| 47441969 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-04-04 12:59 | 1 | 2018-03-04 11:32 | user_5359 ♦19,787 | Hello! Please check the value of hours (normally opening_hours): 27/7 . I have move the cafe to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5453883567, but don't add this impossible value. |
| 56566104 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-02-22 01:02 | 1 | 2018-02-22 12:49 | Constable ♦1,294 | Hi there Alan, do you mind if I ask you to double check this park location? Looking at ESRI Imagery I can't see any park here. It looks like there are just a few buildings here.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563157164Thanks! |
| 2 | 2018-02-22 13:04 | Alan Bragg | Yes, there is a park. Drove by it yesterday using Mapillary. Unfortunately Mapillary images didn't line up due to GPS problem. Y | |
| 56470177 by Alan Bragg @ 2018-02-18 18:14 | 1 | 2018-02-22 12:51 | Constable ♦1,294 | Hi again, great part of this park looks like a parking lot, could you be so kind to increase a bit the park area accuracy?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562294159Thanks |
| 52889496 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-10-13 12:06 | 1 | 2017-10-13 18:43 | SomeoneElse ♦13,419 | Hello,I think that this change might have included rather more objects than anticipated (including some not previously edited by andygol), such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420984991/historyBest Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 19:09 | Alan Bragg | Thanks for your comment. I'll verify all the changes. This one was not by andygol but has the same problem and needs area=yes. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-13 19:32 | SomeoneElse ♦13,419 | There were also examples such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374923973/history which were previously mapped as area:highway. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-13 19:49 | Alan Bragg | Yes, that one is ok. This area:highway=pedestrian or footway all seem to have cropped up in 2015. I was wondering why they did not render and got an answer from scai https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/60067/why-are-some-pedestrian-areas-not-rendering I'm attempting to fix the problems in... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-13 20:19 | SomeoneElse ♦13,419 | For completeness (and apologies if I'm stating the bleeding the obvious here), an "area:highway" is fundamentally different to a "highway; area=yes". Usually it won't make sense to change either the latter to the former or the former to the latter. There is at least o... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-13 20:42 | Alan Bragg | Yes, thanks, I do understand. andygol had changed all highway=pedestrian area=yes to area:highway=pedestrian which caused all plaza type areas in the USA to become black holes in the map. I've been following this note "Note on area=yesDon't use area:highway=* for plazas and similiar... | |
| 52286423 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-09-22 19:00 | 1 | 2017-09-24 08:31 | Harald Hartmann ♦829 | Just leaving this comment as a reminder for `source` and `SOURCE` ... and all the other MassGIS tags ;-) |
| 2 | 2017-09-24 11:55 | Alan Bragg | These tags are artifacts of a long ago import. Many Massachusetts mappers, but not all, agree they should be deleted. I try to delete them from highway ways and nodes I edit. I'll consider deleting them from landuse or leisure ways as well. What we need is a mass removal. Thanks for the comment... | |
| 52052569 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-09-14 21:43 | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:38 | Harald Hartmann ♦829 | Hello Alan Bragg. Is this an import? Is there any discussion about your edit?Why i'm asking: in this changeset you have introduced a lot (nearly 20) of new, unkown, undocumented and uppercase keys! I don't think, that this should be in the osm database. |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:48 | Alan Bragg | Not an import. Reworking bad data from 2009. Old polygons were from digitized maps and poorly aligned. More recent data is now available which is replacing old one polygon at a time after review. I'm lobbying our local community to remove all these massgis: tags that came with the import. | |
| 52031606 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-09-14 09:42 | 1 | 2017-09-15 07:13 | Harald Hartmann ♦829 | Hello Alan Bragg. Also this changeset looks like an import. And at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29776747 you haved tagged `lleisure=..`, i think there's a `l` too much ;-) |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:43 | Alan Bragg | Not an import. In Massachusetts we have about 20 dumb keys that were introduced during the original import in 2009. see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MassGIS | |
| 51694977 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-09-03 15:04 | 1 | 2017-09-15 08:48 | mueschel ♦6,633 | Hi,here is a way with only foreign tags:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521034908 |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:32 | Alan Bragg | deleted tags, added new | |
| 51894448 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-09-09 23:20 | 1 | 2017-09-12 08:17 | mueschel ♦6,633 | Hi,there are two ways with many foreign tags, looks like a mistake:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523877443http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29690100Jan |
| 2 | 2017-09-12 08:18 | mueschel ♦6,633 | Here as well: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374691498maybe there are more. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-12 11:03 | Alan Bragg | Thanks, tags have been deleted.Alan | |
| 37965966 by Alan Bragg @ 2016-03-20 23:24 | 1 | 2017-09-07 08:58 | GerdP ♦2,763 | Hi!Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7712049It seems you changed that way accidentially. |
| 2 | 2017-09-07 10:22 | Alan Bragg | Nice catch. Yes, that was my mistake. I remember now that I was trying to use the iphone app go map!! . | |
| 50669555 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-07-29 11:08 | 1 | 2017-08-04 15:23 | mueschel ♦6,633 | Hi,could you check this way, it has foreign tags only:http://osm.org/way/511262268 |
| 50680289 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-07-29 20:48 | 1 | 2017-07-30 15:37 | mueschel ♦6,633 | Hi,some of the nodes have many foreign tags, could you check that? E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5002215004Ja |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 18:46 | Alan Bragg | Thanks for catching that error and notifying me. I found that I had another similar error which I have corrected. | |
| 49514175 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-06-13 22:43 | 1 | 2017-06-14 10:01 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | It looks like this is a data import, that even covers a large bounding box. If this is an import done with discussion, this is okay, but it must be reverted, as the data imported may be mostly inserted outside the supposed bounds. I do not know whether SomeoneElse will interfere, any time later. |
| 2 | 2017-06-14 10:13 | Alan Bragg | Sorry, this wasn't an import. I made a number of local changes then did a couple map roulette fixes and they probably got caught up in the same changeset. That accounts for the wide distribution. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-14 10:25 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | The changeset has MassGIS data marked as source and that makes this look like an import. That makes this problematic, but wait for SomeoneElse for comment. The changeset may be reverted any time, but I don't know what to do about those local changes or MapRoulette edits. | |
| 4 | 2017-06-14 14:19 | Alan Bragg | I can understand how the comments are confusing. In Massachusetts did have an import of land boundaries many years ago. Problem is that they were all skewed. We use newer imagery to re-align them. | |
| 48069576 by Alan Bragg @ 2017-04-23 19:18 | 1 | 2017-04-29 12:56 | muralito ♦2,051 | Hi Alan.You added some strange keys in this changeset. See for exampe the uppercase keys. Was on purpose or a mistake? |
| 2 | 2017-04-29 13:30 | Alan Bragg | On purpose. The GIS manager in our town has given me a shp file for new buildings. That field the date he updated the building. I'm using his date to keep track of the geometry as I replace them one at a time. In Massachusetts all our buildings were imported years ago and many have been torn do... | |
| 41765216 by Alan Bragg @ 2016-08-28 21:59 | 1 | 2016-08-28 23:21 | Glassman ♦5,345 | looking great! |
| 35338727 by Alan Bragg @ 2015-11-15 22:30 | 1 | 2015-11-17 09:20 | GerdP ♦2,763 | please reviewhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8876219You changed a highway=residentialto a highway=turning_circlewith the comment "roundabouts added"In Bing, the way looks like a turning_loop, not like a turning_circle or roundabout. Both attributes turning_loop and turning_ci... |
| 2 | 2015-11-17 11:06 | Alan Bragg | You are correct. Thanks for reverting my change. I've never reverted a change and just read the wiki to see how it's done. Did you do a "Partial Revert" with the JOSM REVERTER plug-in? | |
| 3 | 2015-11-17 12:05 | GerdP ♦2,763 | Hmm I did not revert your change, and a quick look shows that it is still wrong.I have done reverts with the plugin,full as well as partial, but I see no need for this here. | |
| 4 | 2015-11-17 20:03 | Alan Bragg | Thanks for the feedback. I now understand. The "way" is tagged as a turning_circle. I will remove the tag. I appreciate your help. | |
| 5 | 2015-11-17 20:20 | GerdP ♦2,763 | OK, thanks. | |
| 34029040 by Alan Bragg @ 2015-09-14 20:37 | 1 | 2015-09-15 00:15 | cris4563 ♦1 | boa noite pode m e ajudar a mapear a cidade de Almenara mg nao conta nada nas ruas |
| 30291335 by Alan Bragg @ 2015-04-17 17:34 | 1 | 2015-05-05 19:54 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3461842593 the tag name has a typo. |
| 30291243 by Alan Bragg @ 2015-04-17 17:28 | 1 | 2015-04-30 07:05 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | Alan, thanks for mapping.There are 7 uses of "sanitary_dump_satation:round_drain", which has a typo in the word "station".Also the name tag should be blank, unless the station actually has a name. |
| 2 | 2015-04-30 10:05 | Alan Bragg | Bryce, I can't thank you enough for not just changing the tag yourself. It forced me to find out how to find the other cases. I easily found the 7 instances in taginfo and was wondering how to find the locations. I tried the MAP tab, but that showed the world. Then I found the Overpass Turbo li... | |
| 3 | 2015-04-30 16:09 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | Glad you found it. Note with Turbo you can even do fuzzy searches like "waste:grey_water" which will find even partial strings. | |
| 30140750 by Alan Bragg @ 2015-04-11 12:00 | 1 | 2015-04-14 04:58 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | For the campground in this edit, I think each individual parking spot is a "pitch", where the overall site is a "caravan_site". |
| 2 | 2015-04-15 10:21 | Alan Bragg | Interesting, that's what the Key:tourism wiki site says. I couldn't find an example of this using taginfo. Do you know of a caravan_site that is tagged with pitches? | |
| 3 | 2015-04-15 16:56 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | No I don't, and I've seen a variety of approaches used, including "addr:housenumber" for each pitch (see 36.48988, -121.148099).I'm sure that having each one be a caravan_site is unattractive, and would want to find a better way. | |
| 29853535 by Alan Bragg @ 2015-03-30 15:33 | 1 | 2015-04-09 05:52 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | Thanks for mapping. There is a typo in "sanitary_dump_satatio:gravityn".See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station |
| 2 | 2015-04-09 05:54 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | For rendering support see https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/1466 | |
| 29055311 by Alan Bragg @ 2015-02-23 21:47 | 1 | 2015-03-28 04:11 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | Retagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3369114581/history because that's not a waste water plant. |
| 2 | 2015-03-28 14:59 | Alan Bragg | Thanks for changing this. I resorted to coding dump stations back when I had no other choice. I was planning to go back and change them to sanitary dump stations when I have a good internet connection. I like your :gravity, I'll use that myself. | |
| 3 | 2015-03-29 01:44 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station |