| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 131526694 by Andrew Matheny @ 2023-01-20 23:42 | 1 | 2024-07-20 09:23 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,068 | lanes:forward and lanes:backward is useless with 2 lanes. oneway=no is useless unless its implied. This changeset added oneway=no to a roundabout |
| 129839907 by Andrew Matheny @ 2022-12-08 00:07 | 1 | 2024-01-19 00:00 | Wjconrad ♦1 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9576085648This node appears to have been moved by mistake, there's no LDS distribution center on Jamestown. |
| 2 | 2024-01-19 00:08 | Andrew Matheny | Looks like I accidentally dragged in the browser editor - it was originally in the back of the Dallas Texas Temple.I’ve moved it back. Thanks! | |
| 145639097 by Andrew Matheny @ 2023-12-28 22:14 | 1 | 2023-12-30 17:40 | blackboxlogic ♦458 | From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout"Do not directly connect approaching with departing roads" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145639097 |
| 2 | 2023-12-30 18:36 | blackboxlogic ♦458 | You put a building on top of a building (way 717629158) --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145639097 | |
| 3 | 2023-12-30 18:43 | blackboxlogic ♦458 | Way 1235038995 is also a duplicate. Please respond if you need help fixing these. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145639097 | |
| 114676784 by Andrew Matheny @ 2021-12-07 21:00 | 1 | 2023-05-24 10:00 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1010046262. What is the meaning of the foreign keys ARTPATH = NCOUNTYFP = 135LINEARID = 110480884926MTFCC = H3020STATEFP = 48? |
| 2 | 2023-05-24 11:38 | Andrew Matheny | Looks like leftovers from a very, very old import | |
| 57777005 by Andrew Matheny @ 2018-04-03 15:59 | 1 | 2021-12-27 04:01 | nickvet419 ♦91 | see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#Trunk_tag for correct US road classifications. |
| 72026203 by Andrew Matheny @ 2019-07-08 18:32 | 1 | 2021-02-07 03:15 | Allison P ♦1,135 | Check https://openstreetmap.org/way/702522692. I can't imagine it has a max speed of 100 mph! |
| 87565228 by Andrew Matheny @ 2020-07-05 19:58 | 1 | 2020-07-05 20:02 | TravGW ♦355 | I don't think San Antonio counts as #txsmalltowns |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 20:08 | Andrew Matheny | Aye, this is a tag I created to track edits I do around Texas that started with small towns | |
| 77447886 by Andrew Matheny @ 2019-11-22 23:03 | 1 | 2019-11-22 23:08 | Alhamdulillah ♦34 | The buildings seem to be from Microsoft (https://github.com/microsoft/USBuildingFootprints).Do you have any specific reason for disguising this? |
| 2 | 2019-11-24 18:09 | Andrew Matheny | You would be correct that the data comes from the Microsoft building footprint dataset as the changeset was created in the experimental version of RapiD (http://weeklyosm.eu/archives/12400). I've included a #mapwithAI hashtag to help identify it as AI-assisted mapping, but not the word "im... | |
| 59614363 by Andrew Matheny @ 2018-06-06 20:25 | 1 | 2019-08-05 15:29 | carfog81 ♦139 | Muchas lineas que eran caminos (Path) fueron marcadas como Track, Esto hizo que ayer no pudiera continuar mi ruta en bicicleta. Ya organicé estas vías |
| 68796605 by Andrew Matheny @ 2019-04-02 14:39 | 1 | 2019-04-02 14:45 | Die immer lacht Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-04-02 22:45 | Andrew Matheny | I looked more closely and it looks like the original user may have done this from local knowledge and mapped the whole area with "building=yes". I think it may potentially be a building that has been expanded multiple times, which would explain the varying roof lines, but I didn't wan... | |
| 67562906 by Andrew Matheny @ 2019-02-25 21:23 | 1 | 2019-03-01 06:56 | wade909 ♦2 | quit trying to overide changes done to the area by others please. You modified my personal property without permission |
| 2 | 2019-03-01 15:42 | Andrew Matheny | I'm sorry, but what specific changes are you referring to? | |
| 3 | 2019-03-08 01:18 | wade909 ♦2 | My personal house and it also seems you edited an area in the Arlington Highlands that is technically an urban park in the shopping center. I reverted the changes and they are not contradictory to the map. The grass area is not grass it has benches, fountains, walking paths and other features. | |
| 65451056 by Andrew Matheny @ 2018-12-13 18:34 | 1 | 2018-12-13 18:46 | Andrew Matheny_import ♦3 | should have been uploaded under this account |
| 64949038 by Andrew Matheny @ 2018-11-27 19:31 | 1 | 2018-11-27 20:27 | Andrew Matheny_import ♦3 | This changeset was meant to be done under this import account |
| 60056945 by Andrew Matheny @ 2018-06-21 21:18 | 1 | 2018-06-24 23:36 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,103 | There seems to be a trend in your changesets in unnecessarily upgrading highway=* tags where it's not warranted. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60056945 |
| 2 | 2018-06-25 14:07 | Andrew Matheny | Generally speaking, arterials in urban/suburban areas receive a highway=secondary while collectors get a highway=tertiary. Even though they're laid out in a grid pattern and some only have two lanes, it seems pretty intuitive that these are arterial roadways from a functional classification sta... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-30 14:55 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,103 | While I understand the COG's ideas are a bit aspirational, these tend to be pretty minor roads. You updated 88th Street to tertiary, for example, and I'm not even sure where the COG is getting that idea considering the only thing that really seperates it from any other side street in the ... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-05 14:31 | Andrew Matheny | Fair enough. If you think the tertiary tags are more warranted, I'm not going to pretend to know someone who lives in the area :) | |
| 60078668 by Andrew Matheny @ 2018-06-22 14:55 | 1 | 2018-06-23 16:02 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,103 | Elwood's not really major enough to warrant an upgrade. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60078668 |
| 53237216 by Andrew Matheny @ 2017-10-25 14:25 | 1 | 2017-10-25 14:26 | Andrew Matheny | No review needed |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 00:17 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Hello Andrew Matheny and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Thank you for your valued contribution! OSM lives on the valiant efforts of tireless heroic volunteers such as yourself!! Without people like you, the map would not be what it is today!!!You have requested no review, so here isn't one:... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-26 17:35 | Andrew Matheny | This is hilarious, lol. Thanks for pitching in with reviews (and the occasional non-review :P) | |
| 51856989 by Andrew Matheny @ 2017-09-08 18:35 | 1 | 2017-09-09 18:07 | carciofo ♦186 | Hi there, I just reverted the addition of highway=service to the Doral admin boundary relation (relation 1216666), which I'm sure was added by accident. Would be great if you could review the changeset again, though, to check the specific are you were editing for errors. Thanks! :) |
| 50822102 by Andrew Matheny @ 2017-08-03 22:44 | 1 | 2017-08-03 22:45 | Andrew Matheny | Straightened roads |
| 45732091 by Andrew Matheny @ 2017-02-02 01:31 | 1 | 2017-02-02 20:31 | samely ♦201 | Hi Andrew, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around this zone and found you traced this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20724089/history which has impossible angles and doesn't seem to be based in satellite imagery. Can you check it please?Regards,Eliane |
| 2 | 2017-02-02 20:37 | Andrew Matheny | Fixed! Looks like this was just one particularly nasty TIGER street that needed to be cleaned up the rest of the way | |
| 45120152 by Andrew Matheny @ 2017-01-12 23:29 | 1 | 2017-01-13 09:42 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,all these buildings have many strange tags that don't belong to OSM FEATURE_TY=2000 Join_Count=1 ParcelJoin=1 PointJoin=1 ResCom=R SHAPE_Area=2020.05568017 TARGET_FID=119888 addr_num=1831 addr_stree=Huntingdon Avenue shrt=SFHCould you... |
| 2 | 2017-01-13 15:24 | Andrew Matheny | Jan-Good catch! Updated to remove them (and correct the address tags where needed).Thanks! |