| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162763831 by AngocA @ 2025-02-21 04:05 | 1 | 2025-02-21 04:06 | AngocA | No hay artículo en wikipedia español que sea sobre el Banco Roncador, sino solo sobre el Cayo Roncador que hace parte del Banco - https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roncador |
| 152771493 by AngocA @ 2024-06-16 17:58 | 1 | 2024-10-25 09:04 | pantufla ♦282 | Hello, ok, I was trying to correct this but now I don't know what we should do. Maybe we can open a discussion? |
| 75639771 by AngocA @ 2019-10-14 03:27 | 1 | 2024-05-09 08:37 | mueschel ♦6,659 | Hi,you used the tag socket:gb-t20234 on 3 charging points. This tag is not used in other places. Could you check if these are socket:gb_ac or socket:gb_dc or something completely different? |
| 140247770 by AngocA @ 2023-08-22 21:42 | 1 | 2024-03-06 09:18 | mapperue ♦229 | Hi,you added on this object:openstreetmap.org/way/1201195280tag industrial=Embotelladora Gaseosas del Llano. It would be preferable to use a tag that is already documented on OSM Wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:industrial |
| 47462015 by AngocA @ 2017-04-05 03:56 | 1 | 2023-08-13 19:05 | erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,973 | Angoca, algunas carreteras en esta región parecen no existir como estas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484856591/history |
| 2 | 2023-08-17 02:30 | AngocA | Hola Erick. Eso está mapeado como un track, y por la imagen satelital se ve que es un camino hacia las viviendas al noreste del puente que me mencionas.Qué otras vías ves qué no existan?Mucho de esta área fue mapeado debido a un desastre natural en el 2017. Pue... | |
| 126678484 by AngocA @ 2022-09-27 04:22 | 1 | 2023-03-09 04:10 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,092 | What is the purpose of this edit? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126678484 |
| 129407139 by AngocA @ 2022-11-26 15:45 | 1 | 2022-11-26 16:07 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | nella foto c'era abbastanza più informazione, però io non so cosa sia rilevante e perciò non avevo creato il nodo. credo che così non stia particolarmente bene. evergo è il nome del provider, non di questa stazione di carica. nella foto credo si vedessero altr... |
| 2 | 2022-11-28 00:27 | AngocA | Merci pour le commentaire. Il est mieux d'écrire dans la langue du pay en question, ou par défaut en Anglais. Par rapport les données du chargeur, il manque le type et la puissante éléctrique. | |
| 3 | 2022-11-28 05:59 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | entiendo que no me entendiste. creo que la foto mostraba más detalles, y de todas maneras creo que el nombre de la empresa debería tener su propio campo.creo, pues, y no lo he investigado, sino hubiera mapeado el objeto yo mismo. pero creo que así no esté bien. | |
| 4 | 2022-12-11 09:21 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | it's a pity you closed the note, because the picture https://westnordost.de/p/112723.jpg has now been deleted. | |
| 5 | 2022-12-11 09:26 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station | |
| 6 | 2022-12-11 16:19 | AngocA | and so? | |
| 7 | 2023-01-16 15:04 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | I mean: the note contained more information than you put in the object. I did not know how to represent the information, and I hoped that someone with more experience than me regarding electric cars charging stations would know, for example, what is "level 3" I mentioned in the note, or ho... | |
| 8 | 2023-01-16 15:19 | AngocA | As an owner of an electric car, I know how to map them. However, your photo didn't provide any information about that: connector type, power level, cost. | |
| 9 | 2023-01-16 15:54 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | whatever you say. that means that you do know what is that "nivel 3" that I wrote in the note text? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3361245and what's your opinion about node name vs. brand or operator? | |
| 10 | 2023-01-16 15:58 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | (according to the web site https://evergo.com/en/map/, the name of this specific charging station is "McDonald's Penonomé".)(and according to my picture, there's space for no more than one car.) | |
| 130889079 by AngocA @ 2023-01-05 03:45 | 1 | 2023-01-05 09:15 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,017 | I will retag it to disused:tourism=alpine_hut - that is also correct and less likely to be misinterpreted by data consumers |
| 128714298 by AngocA @ 2022-11-10 05:32 | 1 | 2022-12-29 23:46 | JeroenvanderGun ♦183 | Please don't make changes like this. The name-tag of a boundary relation is intended for the name of the area, not for the name of the corresponding country. I've reverted a lot of your changes.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptionsIf you want to a... |
| 2 | 2022-12-30 15:49 | AngocA | Hi,So, these areas should be names like:"name:es": "Zona Económica Exclusiva de Portugal"In this case:"name:es": "Zona Económica Exclusiva de Suecia" | |
| 3 | 2022-12-30 16:20 | JeroenvanderGun ♦183 | That would vary from country to country. In case of Sweden the best translation is likely "Zona económica de Suecia" (without "exclusiva") - just look at the existing name or name:en and translate that to Spanish as accurately as possible. | |
| 4 | 2022-12-30 18:09 | AngocA | OK, so each country defines its own name. But, the example you gave me shouldn't be on "official_name" tag?Or can we put a common name on "alt_name" for all countries? | |
| 5 | 2022-12-30 18:50 | JeroenvanderGun ♦183 | I figure you want to have the name of the country/territory corresponding to the maritime zone? In that case, if the current country_code=* is not enough information, we could prefix the country/territory info with a "territory:" prefix.For example:boundary=maritimeborder_type=ee... | |
| 130609188 by AngocA @ 2022-12-28 16:12 | 1 | 2022-12-29 20:53 | woodpeck ♦2,472 | Please do not create giant relations like this. We do not map continents in OSM; we have specifically invented coastline ways to avoid having to create multipolygons that are so large that nobody can edit them any more. |
| 128246602 by AngocA @ 2022-10-30 13:29 | 1 | 2022-10-31 01:48 | akadouri ♦58 | Hello, I think you included a stray test feature in this changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10140027295 |
| 2 | 2022-11-16 22:06 | mboeringa ♦49 | Notes *do* contain admin_level tags. In fact, almost all capital cities in the world have the admin_level=2 set on the node, and it is currently the most consistent way to get all country capital. For admin_centre role nodes, that may be part of multiple admin boundary relation, it is quite establis... | |
| 3 | 2022-11-17 05:40 | AngocA | I understand that, but the wiki says the opposite: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_levelProbably it is a common mistake. | |
| 4 | 2022-11-18 07:41 | mboeringa ♦49 | I wouldn't call widespread pretty much established tagging "a common mistake", rather the Wiki likely needs updating to reflect it.There is quite a bit of undocumented established tagging, that really should be taken into account before assuming the Wiki is "right". | |
| 127889604 by AngocA @ 2022-10-21 15:03 | 1 | 2022-10-30 11:43 | Frans S ♦9,878 | Hello. Thanks for mapping hereA remark. * Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads. Most buildings are to be mapped as single buildings.Best regards |
| 2 | 2022-10-30 13:44 | AngocA | Hi Frans, Thank for your observation.I took a look at osmcha https://osmcha.org/changesets/127889604/ , and I don't see any road link to a building.Regarding the buildings, I see I mapped some buildings one next to the other, because there is no space between them. I appreciate if you can p... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-31 09:45 | Frans S ♦9,878 | Hello. Take a look on this web pagehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/2.4672410479968288/-75.99424349968484Indeed, there is no road connection. Just buildings.Best regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127889604 ... | |
| 126679126 by AngocA @ 2022-09-27 04:52 | 1 | 2022-09-27 13:55 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | hola. el "historic" que borraste aquí tiene origen en el https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4463711 como "date", luego pasado a "historic" en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118925581no tengo opinión fuerte al propósito, yo hubiera ... |
| 2 | 2022-09-27 18:55 | AngocA | Hola Mario. Gracias por la observación, voy a tenerla en cuenta. | |
| 117737422 by AngocA @ 2022-02-22 17:30 | 1 | 2022-09-15 20:04 | AngocA | La fuente fue: https://www.cancilleria.gov.co/politica |
| 2 | 2022-09-27 05:00 | AngocA | Para info de cómo calculé las zonas. | |
| 117708623 by AngocA @ 2022-02-22 04:36 | 1 | 2022-09-15 20:04 | AngocA | La fuente fue: https://www.cancilleria.gov.co/politica |
| 2 | 2022-09-27 05:00 | AngocA | Para info de cómo calculé las zonas. | |
| 111567582 by AngocA @ 2021-09-23 02:14 | 1 | 2021-09-24 19:52 | Leonardo Gutierrez ♦17 | Andres, puedes copiar la misma entrada hasta el terminal de salitre de la ruta 13217723 Duitama - Bogota. Todos los buses lo hacen. |
| 2 | 2022-09-27 04:59 | AngocA | Gracias Leo!! | |
| 87262468 by AngocA @ 2020-06-28 22:15 | 1 | 2022-06-28 16:29 | Fred73000 ♦223 | Hi,good work.But you have created a lot of boundary relations with no borders.According to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members, ways for the borders are required (red box).I fixed one of this relation : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/... |
| 2 | 2022-09-15 20:06 | AngocA | Hi Fred, thank you for this comment. I didn't know the type collection. I will convert some relations to this type. | |
| 117737856 by AngocA @ 2022-02-22 17:41 | 1 | 2022-02-22 20:55 | mariotomo ♦1,900 | hola, me sacas de la duda … en el changeset escribes "source=bing", pero por supuesto que las fronteras en el mar no son visibles en las fotos aéreas … y bueno la duda es cuál sería la fuente. |
| 2 | 2022-09-15 20:04 | AngocA | La fuente fue: https://www.cancilleria.gov.co/politica | |
| 105176313 by AngocA @ 2021-05-23 16:37 | 1 | 2021-08-19 12:27 | Mamma li Turchi ♦4 | Please keep your changesets smaller. |
| 2 | 2022-09-15 20:00 | AngocA | Thank you for the advise. I am doing much more smaller changes since your comment.I did this mistake because I was correcting many of my own previous commits from osmose, but I didn't pay attention to the area. | |
| 119450221 by AngocA @ 2022-04-08 03:55 | 1 | 2022-04-11 19:59 | krusefahrer ♦56 | Why has https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5441369/history no building tag? |
| 2 | 2022-04-11 20:27 | AngocA | Hi. Yes it seems there was a problem in that area. I was just correcting te postal code. I mean, I didn't introduce that error. | |
| 118925581 by AngocA @ 2022-03-25 19:48 | 1 | 2022-03-27 22:02 | wireguy ♦549 | Andres,way 1043857949 seems to be missing from Dique relation 11341441can you investigate? |
| 2 | 2022-03-28 01:56 | AngocA | Thank you for the notificaion, I already corrected. Can you validate? | |
| 113590664 by AngocA @ 2021-11-10 03:59 | 1 | 2021-11-18 22:03 | carfog81 ♦139 | Hola. Por qué eliminaste las relaciones multipolígono que tenía para definir las estaciones del MIO? |
| 2 | 2021-11-19 05:31 | AngocA | Hola Carfog81, las borré porque dibujé como las plataformas de abordaje. Además, en una nota indicaban que todas las plataformas estaban mapeadas como estaciones, y el término estación tiene la connotación de terminal en inglés. Por lo tanto arregl&ea... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-22 02:32 | carfog81 ♦139 | Sabes que no estoy muy de acuerdo con eso. Por lo general trato de mapear usando relaciones multipolígono porque considero que evitan errores en la topología de las entidades de OSM. Hay que tener en cuenta que esas plataformas y su espacio interior peatonal entre ellas son considerada... | |
| 4 | 2021-11-26 00:59 | AngocA | Hola, había pasado este mensaje, y no me había dado cuenta de tu respuesta. Cuando hice el cambio, tomé la precaución de hacerlo, ya que como puedes ver en el siguiente query, no hay mucho mapeado sobre transporte público en Cali: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ds7... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-26 01:02 | AngocA | Para que revises mis cambios, estos son los otros changesets del transporte de Cali:* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113590454* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113589611* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113588058 | |
| 109951171 by AngocA @ 2021-08-19 19:30 | 1 | 2021-09-01 19:58 | erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,973 | you created this relations, this is like a collection of many relations, i dont think this make sense. |
| 2 | 2021-09-03 02:24 | AngocA | I created this parent relation to have a simple way to get all Colombian relations, and maintain all of them in a single place (borders, regions, departments, provinces, municipalities). The boundaries are easily and commonly modified and disconnected. This relation does not have any visible element... | |
| 52129520 by AngocA @ 2017-09-18 00:54 | 1 | 2017-10-10 15:51 | burtlang ♦28 | Do you think moving addr:street to short_name is good alliterative? The tag would read (short_name: AK 9). This will free up addr:street |
| 2 | 2017-10-11 05:18 | AngocA | This is a building, and it should contain an address. A short_name like AK 9 is the contraction of Avenida Carrera 9, and it should be written complete as it in the Address street. Abbreviations like that are not a good thing for OSM, because this is like data redundancy. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-11 14:49 | burtlang ♦28 | I agree with not adding this to a building. But say for street names. The short_name is actually used and appears that way (abbreviated) on the street signs throughout the city. Where do you recommend that information should go? | |
| 4 | 2018-01-15 04:19 | AngocA | The information about how to abbreviate carrera or calle is not standard, and the render should do that, but hits information should not be in the OSM database. | |
| 35979596 by AngocA @ 2015-12-16 03:25 | 1 | 2015-12-17 09:07 | GerdP ♦2,767 | Hi there!I've noticed that you used highway=crossingfor a way. Guess it was a typo?I've corrected it, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386113267 |
| 2 | 2017-04-11 03:36 | AngocA | I did not create it. I modified the way. Probably, it is better to check the history of the people that created/modified the way. Not just the last edition. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-11 06:00 | GerdP ♦2,767 | It was version 1 at that time, so you created it. Maybe you split an existing way. Anyway, good to know that you did not use the tag by intention :-) |