| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169795005 by Bkissin @ 2025-08-01 01:07 | 1 | 2025-08-01 06:40 | JeroenHoek ♦661 | Please look at note, note:en, and not:network:wikidata for those train relations you changed. |
| 2 | 2025-08-01 06:44 | JeroenHoek ♦661 | Also look at the wrong tag you reapplied to a pastry shop:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1143431133(Not a bakery.)You are blindly applying ID suggestions. Why? | |
| 3 | 2025-08-01 07:26 | A67-A67 ♦963 | I've reverted this change, because suggestions were accepted without checking. | |
| 169794971 by Bkissin @ 2025-08-01 01:05 | 1 | 2025-08-01 07:23 | A67-A67 ♦963 | In this change you've added bus stops to a non-existing network 'Arriva'. Just as for your other change, please check the suggestions of the iD editor. Those are suggestions, not errors. |
| 2 | 2025-08-01 07:26 | A67-A67 ♦963 | I've reverted this change, because suggestions were accepted without checking. | |
| 157047869 by Bkissin @ 2024-09-24 16:28 | 1 | 2025-04-17 08:12 | JeroenHoek ♦661 | If you add memorials, please don't enter the names and inscriptions in ALL-CAPS as you did with the stolpersteine here. Capitalise the text following normal spelling conventions.Cf.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice |
| 158304429 by Bkissin @ 2024-10-24 16:21 | 1 | 2024-10-30 20:49 | MxxCon ♦3,360 | Hello.You should not have renamed 5889475671. "Banana Republic Factory" is a different store from "Banana Republic". |
| 133525654 by Bkissin @ 2023-03-10 16:27 | 1 | 2023-03-19 17:30 | scarapella ♦36 | Hi Bkissin,Thank you for our contribution to open streetmap. I noticed this changeset for 2 reasons. First it seems like you use multiple values for landuse. I don't know that this is a common convention as the renderers don't know how to show this area. It also flags an osmose QA r... |
| 2 | 2023-03-19 17:34 | scarapella ♦36 | you can also see how your edit removed some of the wetlands previously drawn such as https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1111192735so overall this changeset degrades the information that was previously on OSM. I would recommend reverting this changeset. | |
| 3 | 2023-03-22 15:28 | Bkissin | Hi @scarapella! Sorry about the issue. It was an attempt to create the natural wood feature around the existing wetland features, but obviously it didn't come out the right way. Happy to take care of that. It's been a while since I've had to revert a changeset. How do I do it again? | |
| 4 | 2023-03-22 16:09 | scarapella ♦36 | Hello Bkissin,No worries. An BTW if it's easier for you to just repair, no problem at all. I just proposed a revert as it's what I would have done, but then you do lose the work you put into defining the wooded area. The (only) way I know how to revert (which is inevitably because... | |
| 81468222 by Bkissin @ 2020-02-25 18:21 | 1 | 2021-05-16 13:32 | DUGA ♦549 | Maryland does not favor any ESRI source, please do not add building with incorrect offset here.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776307238#map=19/39.69982/-78.17642 |
| 84368994 by Bkissin @ 2020-04-30 00:19 | 1 | 2020-04-30 20:17 | Bkissin | https://www.bangormaine.gov/mapsandroutes |
| 84367204 by Bkissin @ 2020-04-29 23:05 | 1 | 2020-04-30 20:17 | Bkissin | https://www.bangormaine.gov/mapsandroutes |
| 84366332 by Bkissin @ 2020-04-29 22:30 | 1 | 2020-04-30 20:16 | Bkissin | Oops, forgot to add where I got the information: https://www.cityofbath.com/CityBus/https://evocloud-prod3-public.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/media/26/media/5a473226-0b49-4b78-acd9-e5a0b2dd0e66.pdf |
| 80555841 by Bkissin @ 2020-02-04 21:50 | 1 | 2020-02-05 18:31 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | I hope the address nodes make adding buildings easier, and don't get in the way. Thanks for changing them into buildings. Please do let me know if you find issues with the address nodes, I still have 2/3 of Maine left to do and I'd rather find out before instead of after. Consider joining ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-13 17:49 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | I'm curious where you found the name for this park? Everything I can find lists the name prior to your change. osm.org/way/420434108 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80555841 | |
| 3 | 2020-02-13 17:50 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | OH NO I TAKE THAT BACK. Please ignore my previous comment. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80555841 | |
| 4 | 2020-02-13 17:56 | Bkissin | No worries! https://www.portlandmaine.gov/2235/Fessendan-Park | |
| 80490512 by Bkissin @ 2020-02-03 16:47 | 1 | 2020-02-04 20:44 | Belobog ♦17 | The forest at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769417437 is very accurate, but shouldn't it be a multipolygon (not overlaying the water)? |
| 72814389 by Bkissin @ 2019-07-30 14:00 | 1 | 2020-01-06 23:46 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,694 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79269167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Google-sourced changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34915225 for context. |
| 72784878 by Bkissin @ 2019-07-29 19:54 | 1 | 2020-01-06 23:46 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,694 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79269167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Google-sourced changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34915225 for context. |
| 38840998 by Bkissin @ 2016-04-24 19:40 | 1 | 2020-01-06 23:46 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,694 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79269167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Google-sourced changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34915225 for context. |
| 38842599 by Bkissin @ 2016-04-24 21:15 | 1 | 2020-01-06 23:46 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,694 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79269167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Google-sourced changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34915225 for context. |
| 34915225 by Bkissin @ 2015-10-27 22:12 | 1 | 2019-12-23 11:56 | SomeoneElse ♦13,419 | Hello, I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 4 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377214393/history was added with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn... |
| 2 | 2020-01-06 23:46 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,694 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79269167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Google-sourced changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34915225 for context. | |
| 35138173 by Bkissin @ 2015-11-06 23:11 | 1 | 2020-01-06 23:46 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,694 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79269167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Google-sourced changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34915225 for context. |
| 38841805 by Bkissin @ 2016-04-24 20:22 | 1 | 2020-01-06 23:46 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,694 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79269167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Google-sourced changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34915225 for context. |
| 78895590 by Bkissin @ 2019-12-26 19:32 | 1 | 2019-12-26 21:56 | mapman44 ♦527 | Your bounding box on this changeset covers the entire US. Please make a changeset for each city or local area instead. Thanks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78895590 |
| 78700465 by Bkissin @ 2019-12-20 22:02 | 1 | 2019-12-23 12:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,419 | Hello Bkissin,Many of your more recent changesets have the same changeset comment "updating tags". It'd be really helpful if you could explain in a bit more detail what you're doing, as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . For example, are you sur... |
| 64980574 by Bkissin @ 2018-11-28 17:37 | 1 | 2019-11-05 00:55 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | I'm curious about the address on the charging station node:6100554288Do you remember what the data-source for that was? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64980574 |
| 2 | 2019-11-05 01:02 | Bkissin | Partially local knowledge, partially GoogleMaps, partially Chargepoint map (https://na.chargepoint.com/charge_point) | |
| 3 | 2019-12-08 22:14 | SomeoneElse ♦13,419 | Hello Bkissin,I hope you don't mind me commenting about a change from over a year ago, but unfortunately (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F ) we can't actually use that as a source in OpenStreetMap. It looks like ... | |
| 4 | 2019-12-08 23:34 | blackboxlogic ♦459 | SomeoneElse (Andy),I interpreted his response (combined with context) as "I don't remember where I got that data". Consider seeking his clarification before removing all or part of Bkissin's changes. I've bumped up against some of the other changes in this changeset whic... | |
| 5 | 2019-12-09 00:36 | SomeoneElse ♦13,419 | We (the DWG) actually got a complaint from elsewhere about Google usage. I was in the process of adding a changeset discussion comment to a different changeset with source=google objects on it when I saw this one and so commented here.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 64945137 by Bkissin @ 2018-11-27 17:34 | 1 | 2018-11-27 19:45 | b-jazz ♦715 | Hi again Bkissin,I'd love it if you could stop doing the following style of mapping: https://imgur.com/a/oaR0j1m since it gets tagged by validators like OSM Inspector and I end up going in and cleaning it up. If you can't use multipolygons, at least don't use the same nodes going ... |
| 2 | 2018-11-27 19:50 | Bkissin | Thanks @b-jazz! I appreciate your patience with my issues here. Is there a particular "manual of style" regarding houses near the woods like this situation? Should I just make a clean polygon and add the buildings later? I'll have to try to do more work around multipolygons to try and... | |
| 3 | 2018-11-27 20:02 | b-jazz ♦715 | I'm pretty sure that the correct, manual of style way is to use an inner polygon for the non wood types of the outer polygon. If that is too difficult with the given tools, I'd venture to guess that making the whole area a forest and then adding some buildings inside the forest would be ac... | |
| 4 | 2018-11-28 15:47 | Bkissin | I have very little experience around multipolygons. Mostly it has been merging several forest/wood polygons together to make a larger multipolygon, or trying to make riverbank features. These have had largely successful results, but sometimes leads to situations like Relation:8794638. I don't ... | |
| 5 | 2018-11-28 17:28 | b-jazz ♦715 | It's actually easier than I thought it would be. Try this:1) draw an area around a forest2) draw an area around some residential property inside that forest3) hold down shift and select the outer area. you should now have two areas selected.4) press "C" to combine the two. 5... | |
| 54545674 by Bkissin @ 2017-12-11 17:12 | 1 | 2018-11-26 05:48 | b-jazz ♦715 | Hi @Bkissin. I fixed up your wooded area around the Shallow Pond in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64884669It was generating errors because of the segments that went in to surround the lake and then came back out over the same segment. You don't have to draw around the pond a secon... |