| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94214470 by Bolt003 @ 2020-11-16 16:35 | 1 | 2021-04-14 14:36 | infeeeee ♦517 | Hello. In this changeset this road doesn't exist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/872372569It's a very dense urban area, GPSes can "drift" a lot on the narrow streets.I deleted the road in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102936752 |
| 2 | 2023-03-07 13:59 | proofone ♦1 | Hi! This way is not a public road (can not be accessed if gates are closed): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/872372564#map=17/47.50754/19.00490 | |
| 3 | 2023-03-07 14:43 | infeeeee ♦517 | @proofone: I added access=private to that road. This account seems inactive. | |
| 105340790 by Bolt003 @ 2021-05-26 08:29 | 1 | 2022-04-16 11:29 | evod ♦95 | Hey, how did you determine that this road is a oneway? It is not (I just checked) and it never was the last few years. |
| 105337868 by Bolt003 @ 2021-05-26 07:45 | 1 | 2021-07-03 10:48 | Nielkrokodil ♦105 | Hallo Bolt003,bist du dir hier sicher? Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass zwischen Tinterstraße und Waidhausenstraße eine Einbahn ist errichtet wurde. Warst du dort? Woher hast du die Info? |
| 2 | 2021-07-11 07:52 | Nielkrokodil ♦105 | Hi Bolt003,I visited this site and your change was incorrect. I will correct it now. Please tell us, why you did it? Did you check in place? | |
| 3 | 2021-07-13 10:17 | Bolt003 | According to the mapillary street imagery https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.203144444444&lng=16.274525&z=17&pKey=499868177869885&focus=photo cars were placed only in one direction. Nonetheless, the sign where Flotzersteig and Tinterstrabe cross shows that the road is not oneway. ... | |
| 107630624 by Bolt003 @ 2021-07-08 11:23 | 1 | 2021-07-13 08:16 | Cd_spb ♦11 | Прошу соединять новые дороги со старыми.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962585823https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227951086https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545898200 |
| 2 | 2021-07-13 10:09 | Bolt003 | Исправил ваши замечания, благодарю за комментарии! | |
| 105761998 by Bolt003 @ 2021-06-03 08:04 | 1 | 2021-06-07 18:14 | simulator1 ♦26 | This oneway street edit does not seem to be correct. I will survey it in person. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 07:58 | Bolt003 | Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-08 11:09 | Bolt003 | I've checked this one again using mapillary imagery and seems that this road is not oneway. I'll correct it ASAP. | |
| 4 | 2021-06-10 16:43 | Rostaman521 ♦17 | AFAIK the whole secondary_link is oneway, except for this part between the traffic light and the beginning of the gas station (so cars don't have to drive 1 km east and turn around just to get to the gas station). It's visible on the osm-hr 2018 satellite imagery | |
| 5 | 2021-06-21 09:23 | Bolt003 | Thank you for the feedbacks! | |
| 105718503 by Bolt003 @ 2021-06-02 10:56 | 1 | 2021-06-07 18:16 | simulator1 ♦26 | This oneway street edit does not seem to be correct. I will survey it in person. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 07:57 | Bolt003 | Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-08 11:32 | Bolt003 | I've double checked using mapillary and this road is indeed oneway. Please, see the imagery here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.810794&lng=15.928763&z=20 | |
| 4 | 2021-06-17 14:06 | simulator1 ♦26 | Hello,I have surveyed Ulica Petra Zrinskog on the segment that was changed in this changeset and it is not a oneway.Also, on the mapillary images there are no oneway signs on Zrinskog-Duvanjska-Ivanica, ogulinca-zzrinskog nor zrinskog-trakošćanskog crossings.corrected in changeset:ht... | |
| 5 | 2021-06-21 09:22 | Bolt003 | Thank you for the feedbacks! | |
| 105761729 by Bolt003 @ 2021-06-03 08:00 | 1 | 2021-06-07 18:14 | simulator1 ♦26 | This oneway street edit does not seem to be correct. I will survey it in person. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 07:57 | Bolt003 | Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-08 11:22 | Bolt003 | I've double checked the changeset. According to mapillary imagery, this road is oneway. Please, check this link https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.803385&lng=15.963364&z=20 | |
| 4 | 2021-06-10 16:32 | Rostaman521 ♦17 | Where do you see this? I'm looking here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.80337843000004&lng=15.963285380000002&z=17&pKey=234419381797178 (picture from 2014). The left turn lane in the opposite direction is plainly visible. I think the road is two-way even for non-taxi to help d... | |
| 5 | 2021-06-14 11:18 | Bolt003 | Hello! Please see this picture from 2020 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.803366778333&lng=15.962889259444&z=17&pKey=475263953806669&focus=photo. It has a red "no entrance" sign. Which means this road is actually oneway. | |
| 6 | 2021-06-17 00:50 | Rostaman521 ♦17 | Thank you for posting that picture, I can confirm that is a no entrance sign. However the text on the white additional panel below says "except for vehicles using parking lot, taxis and trams" (Croatian original: "osim vozila korisnika parkinga, TAXI i TRAM"). The only driveway l... | |
| 7 | 2021-06-18 10:15 | Janjko ♦86 | I agree with Rostaman521, this little part isn't oneway for vehicles going into the parking. The signage isn't very intuitive, but I guess that was intended. It's better to show a big red "no entrance" sign for people that don't know about the parking, and a little whit... | |
| 8 | 2021-06-21 09:20 | Bolt003 | Thank you for all your feedbacks! | |
| 105761901 by Bolt003 @ 2021-06-03 08:03 | 1 | 2021-06-07 18:15 | simulator1 ♦26 | It seems that oneway should extend to the end of Kriška ulica. I will survey it in person. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 07:57 | Bolt003 | Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-08 11:17 | Bolt003 | I double checked the mapillary. It has only imagery for the beginning of the road. Therefore, only the beginning was marked oneway. | |
| 4 | 2021-06-08 11:23 | Bolt003 | link to the imagery https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.809862&lng=16.0173&z=20 | |
| 105762514 by Bolt003 @ 2021-06-03 08:13 | 1 | 2021-06-07 18:14 | simulator1 ♦26 | This oneway street edit does not seem to be correct. I will survey it in person. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 07:58 | Bolt003 | Hello! Thank you for your feedback and your help. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-08 10:53 | Bolt003 | https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.821355&lng=15.976845&z=18 also, please, check this link. the imagery here shows that the road is oneway | |
| 105760233 by Bolt003 @ 2021-06-03 07:36 | 1 | 2021-06-07 18:16 | simulator1 ♦26 | This edit seems to be correct. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 07:57 | Bolt003 | Hello! Thank you for your feedback. | |
| 105718428 by Bolt003 @ 2021-06-02 10:53 | 1 | 2021-06-07 18:17 | simulator1 ♦26 | This edit seems to be correct. |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 07:55 | Bolt003 | Hello! Thank you for your feedback! | |
| 105082602 by Bolt003 @ 2021-05-21 10:27 | 1 | 2021-05-24 00:58 | MacLondon ♦214 | This road is definitely not oneway. Please stop doing all these inaccurate "oneway updated" edits in London. If you don't know the areas, you shouldn't be guessing. |
| 2 | 2021-05-24 07:16 | Bolt003 | Hello! Thank you for your feedback. Our edits are made based on the ML detections that are not always perfectly precise. I'll be more accurate. | |
| 105082863 by Bolt003 @ 2021-05-21 10:31 | 1 | 2021-05-24 00:33 | MacLondon ♦214 | Hi. Are you sure about the oneway=yes tagging on Gillespie Road and Drayton Park? To my knowledge this was supposed to be kept as a two-way road. |
| 103059575 by Bolt003 @ 2021-04-16 12:19 | 1 | 2021-04-16 17:01 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | reviewed - good! |
| 100690226 by Bolt003 @ 2021-03-09 08:13 | 1 | 2021-03-09 09:56 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Hello. Ways cannot hang out like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914948934 ALL ways must be connected to another ways (to road network), otherwise this segment is unreachable/unroutable. |
| 2 | 2021-03-09 11:36 | Bolt003 | Hello, thank you for the feedback. Corrected it. Regards, | |
| 100191966 by Bolt003 @ 2021-03-01 09:42 | 1 | 2021-03-01 11:48 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Do these features actually exist? As it looks like you're adding features according to outdated ortophotos. That is you're adding things which have been deleted because of construction which is going on there now. |
| 100039500 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-26 09:59 | 1 | 2021-02-26 12:18 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | There is no such thing as highway=driveway, there is highway=service+service=driveway.Ways should not cross each other without a node on the intersection (unless it is a bridge/tunnel). So this one must have had a connection to the path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911181936 (fixed that) |
| 99967888 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-25 10:26 | 1 | 2021-02-25 16:23 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | This road is not a service https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910780308 it is a footway. |
| 99887795 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-24 08:45 | 1 | 2021-02-24 12:07 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Reviewed. Service road to the bank cannot start on footway, it is an automobile accesable road graph parto so should be connected to main road network (to Žirmūnų g.).(Fixed that) |
| 99806884 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-23 08:46 | 1 | 2021-02-23 09:05 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Reviewed. Looks fine. |
| 99437126 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-17 09:10 | 1 | 2021-02-17 16:51 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Hello Bolt003, If you're updating OSM on behalf of https://bolt.eu/en/ , I'd expect Bolt to be following: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines which would mean that for any project that you work on an entry is created at https://wiki.ope... |
| 2 | 2021-02-22 10:03 | Bolt003 | Hello. Thank you for the feedback. I've updated my profile. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-22 10:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Thanks for that! | |
| 99369223 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-16 10:03 | 1 | 2021-02-16 12:06 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Reviewed. All is good. |
| 99366642 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-16 09:31 | 1 | 2021-02-16 10:36 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Are you sure this one is a service road (for cars)?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907669940 |
| 99320948 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-15 15:59 | 1 | 2021-02-16 06:00 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Reviewed. Everything is good. |
| 99032026 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-10 10:01 | 1 | 2021-02-13 00:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Hello Bolt003,Thanks for updating your profile and for engaging with the local community, and using a hashtag that links back to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activites/Bolt . Just one more thing though - could you possibly update your profile so that it is like https://ww... |
| 99109669 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-11 13:09 | 1 | 2021-02-11 17:08 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Reviewed. All is well! Thank you. |
| 99031212 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-10 09:50 | 1 | 2021-02-10 10:19 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Everything is fine now. Thank you! |
| 98979970 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-09 13:19 | 1 | 2021-02-09 16:51 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Are you sure about this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905439763 ? |
| 2 | 2021-02-10 09:51 | Bolt003 | Hey, thanks for the feedback. I have corrected it. Do you mind checking it one more time? | |
| 3 | 2021-02-10 10:15 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | No problem, I will review the new changesets and comment there. | |
| 98977374 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-09 12:34 | 1 | 2021-02-09 16:37 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | I have a question regarding this way:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905422611Is that driveway really there? Existing houses leave no place for any passing through. |
| 2 | 2021-02-10 09:52 | Bolt003 | Hey, thank you for the feedback! I have corrected it. Do you mind checking it one more time? | |
| 98958524 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-09 08:28 | 1 | 2021-02-09 16:13 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Reviewed. Mostly OK. I've noticed a slight offset of vectorised features. When in Lithuania, it is suggested to use official highly precise ORT10LT ortophotograpic map. |
| 98903403 by Bolt003 @ 2021-02-08 10:52 | 1 | 2021-02-08 15:56 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Reviewed. Everything is fine. I've just added some minor additions: service=driveway for service roads. And way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905005669#map=19/54.63895/25.32184 is a short driveway to two houses, therefore highway=service. |
| 97823616 by Bolt003 @ 2021-01-20 09:10 | 1 | 2021-01-23 12:26 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Hello Bolt003,If you're updating OSM on behalf of https://bolt.eu/en/ , I'd expect Bolt to be following:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelineswhich would mean that for any project that you work on an entry is created at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... |
| 97747123 by Bolt003 @ 2021-01-19 07:44 | 1 | 2021-01-19 12:14 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,949 | Fixed some service->footway. Maxar Premium imagery has offset in alignment, fixed according to precise ORT10LT. |
| 94423033 by Bolt003 @ 2020-11-19 09:04 | 1 | 2020-12-02 05:52 | vasony ♦494 | Szia!A Szív utca 46 és 48/b építkezéseket letörölted, és helyére két szervizutat rajzoltál, miért?Tamás |