| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121792860 by Bolt019 @ 2022-06-01 05:20 | 1 | 2022-06-21 06:54 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | WelcomeWhy were these ways deleted even though they already exist!If you deleted it because it is not accessible, you can add a access=* tag on the roads to restrict access to it, see:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access |
| 2 | 2022-06-21 06:57 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | Sorry, do you have certain information that this place was demolished within the rehabilitation project of Jeddah? | |
| 3 | 2022-06-21 10:57 | Bolt019 | Hello Abdullah,Thanks for your time in reviewing the edits made.Upon realizing that the newly added roads are inside a Military polygon (which we generally don't create inside restricted areas), I have deleted the road created by me, no existing data is modified or deleted.Your comm... | |
| 4 | 2022-06-22 17:12 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | Aha, thanks for the clarification, and thank you very much for your efforts in mapping the missing roads.Regards | |
| 121792855 by Bolt019 @ 2022-06-01 05:20 | 1 | 2022-06-21 06:54 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | WelcomeWhy were these ways deleted even though they already exist!If you deleted it because it is not accessible, you can add a access=* tag on the roads to restrict access to it, see:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access |
| 106139460 by Bolt019 @ 2021-06-10 08:14 | 1 | 2021-07-15 13:06 | Enock4seth ♦548 | Please, adjust imagery offset instead of moving existing data, see https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/29474768 |
| 106134223 by Bolt019 @ 2021-06-10 06:59 | 1 | 2021-07-09 09:11 | Enock4seth ♦548 | This becoming too much, I don't understand why you people have decided not to take into consideration imagery offset and just blindly adding what is of interest to you without respecting existing data. Why? |
| 2 | 2021-07-09 10:35 | Bolt019 | Hello Enock4seth,Thanks for your valuable time in reviewing the edits made. We sincerely acknowledge that the edits made during the initial days of working went wrong and we are in the process to validate all of them and make corrections if any. We will take your feedback on high precedence and ... | |
| 106947171 by Bolt019 @ 2021-06-25 08:34 | 1 | 2021-06-25 12:40 | Enock4seth ♦548 | Please kindly AVOID moving existing objects to imagery, first investigate well (using other imageries, GPS traces, etc.) and adjust imagery offset OR before moving features. |
| 2 | 2021-06-25 15:59 | Bolt019 | Hello Enock4seth,Thank you for your valuable time in reviewing the edits made. We will take your feedback on high precedence and make sure similar errors are not repeated hear after. We are inprocess of reverting the edits made as per your suggestion and will update you once the corrections are ... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-26 07:26 | Bolt019 | Hello Enock4seth,As suggested we have reverted the incorrect edits made to building polygons. Validation results suggested us to modify building polygons which are overlapping with the road segments and hence the edited were made before. Thanks again for your valueable time in reviewing the edit... |