| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 157672772 by Bolt026 @ 2024-10-09 13:34 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,048 | Ne, nebėra tokios gatvės „L. Giros“ Vilniuje. Atšaukiau pakeitimą. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,048 | Upps, taip ir pakeista. Viskas gerai tada :-) | |
| 155130948 by Bolt026 @ 2024-08-12 06:18 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,831 | Why are the roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995511822 access=no? What traffic sign is there? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Bolt026 | Hi aceman444,Based on your previous notice: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153399154, I realised that I did a multiple selection and by mistake deleted the access=no from some other small road segments, including this :( . I just tried to revert those changes based on the initial OSM data... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,831 | These small roads are clearly visible on aerial imagery (like ESRI or Ortofotomozaika SR) as finished (no construction around them). So I will remove the access=no as even though the roads are oneway and end in a dead-end (noexit=yes) in a field, but e.g. pedestrians can go there as they can ignore ... | |
| 155009679 by Bolt026 @ 2024-08-09 08:03 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Vaidotas ♦69 | This turn restriction is invalid: restriction doesn't match topology.Also, it incorrectly redirects ALL traffic driving on roundabout. Please fix it. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ygcgjp5 ♦110 | this is fixed by doing a reversion, as there is no time to wait for such awful changesets.. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | ygcgjp5 ♦110 | note that this restriction has already been mapped via a "only_straight_on" restriction. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Bolt026 | Hey! Thank you very much for the notification and the fix! I clearly added the wrong turn restriction members by mistake. I will double check my future edits before uploading the data. | |
| 153399154 by Bolt026 @ 2024-07-01 08:01 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,831 | So you can see access permissions from Imagery, even outdated one?Provide your real sources already as many of your changes or questionable or outright wrong and I have to revert them. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Bolt026 | Hi aceman444,Thank you for your comment!We have been made aware by our customers that the map won't let them guide the drivers to the new Labutia street, even though they could pick them up from those addresses. I also did a research but unfortunately I couldn’t find an announcement f... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,831 | So if you have been personally to the street and have seen it is accessible, then write source=survey to the changeset, not ESRI world imagery.But accessible street of Labutia, does not explain why you removed access=no from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41447044 but still left it as being i... | |
| 153696180 by Bolt026 @ 2024-07-08 10:12 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | empty_child ♦389 | Good afternoonIt's an excessive addition. The amenity tag describes the type of POI |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Bolt026 | Hi empty_child,Thank you for your comment! Will keep that in mind for the next changes. | |
| 148371658 by Bolt026 @ 2024-03-08 08:04 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Bobropiton ♦147 | hi!"Kotka tn is closed to normal traffic, but public transport traffic is allowed".So, construction key- it's a mistake. Sorry.use tag access=* and tag psv=*Fixed in 150049057 chngst |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Bolt026 | Hi Bobropiton,Thank you so much for your observation and for updating the map! | |
| 147800719 by Bolt026 @ 2024-02-23 07:57 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | HellMap ♦865 | Hello,When placing barriers, like a gate, please be careful not to place it on an incorrect location. You placed it on the node that is a crossing between the cycleway and the service road, thus blocking all routing along the cycleway.I have fixed this.Thanks |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Bolt026 | Hi,Thank you for letting me know and also for your fix! I will keep this in mind for future edits.Have a great day! | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | richlv ♦424 | Thank you for the quick reply, greatly appreciated :) | |
| 130152737 by Bolt026 @ 2022-12-16 11:47 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,831 | Hi, what are these 'entrances' good for? There is no enclosed area that you need to know where the entrance is (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance). |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Bolt026 | Hi aceman444 :) I've added the entrance tag to this polygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260754590 at point where people can enter or leave the area, to fix the routing to University of Economics in Bratislava as this place was initially imported with the coordinates of the centroid, and... | |
| 131326603 by Bolt026 @ 2023-01-16 08:15 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦499 | Hi, please always check with Estonian land board's gis.https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/app/maainfoThis building has two addresses.https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=EE00643248Having addr2:*** like it had previously is not the best solution, but we can place another a... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Bolt026 | Hi,Thank you so much for sharing these links and for fixing the map. I will consider this approach in my future similar edits and I will be more cautious in checking all the available sources. The customer who lives in that building provided us with the information about the entrance at Kauba 26... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦499 | Really strange. The land board thinks it's Kauba 26https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=ME02784472Note that there is another shed on this cadastral unit. It has a Paide 16 address.Anyway, the sheds aren't that important, considering the special case of a building with 2 ad... | |
| 130872140 by Bolt026 @ 2023-01-04 15:35 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦499 | I think it's better to use access=private for private areas. |
| 130832256 by Bolt026 @ 2023-01-03 15:45 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦499 | Hi, please don't forget to add addr:city |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Bolt026 | Hey :) Thanks for the reminder! I've just added the tag.Have a mappy year! | |
| 126261581 by Bolt026 @ 2022-09-16 12:03 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | somix ♦88 | Hi, "shopping center" is already implied in the shop=mall tag, so you don't need to put it in the title.You can read more about names here:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Bolt026 | Hi somix :) Thanks for sharing the link.I've added the S/C Spice and S/C Spice Home based on the website, with the extended names, but I understand it's not necessary to be added.Thank you for making the changes.Have a great week! |