| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160201413 by Bolt028 @ 2024-12-12 10:23 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Vaidotas ♦69 | Why did you add restriction tags on a node? Restrictions should be mapped as a relations and there is one already mapped. Not to mention, that it is even more precise than your version, because turn left is allowed on weekends here. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Bolt028 | Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have reverted my changes. | |
| 135187894 by Bolt028 @ 2023-04-21 10:45 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,831 | Hi, what is the exact traffic sign here? There is a gate blocking these roads so access=destination seems weird. Anyone who decides he has destination there can go there? You also marked the main street crossing the area but there are many other streets where this restriction would apply (as they ar... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Bolt028 | Hi access= destination prohibits routing through this road (If I am not mistaken it is only for residents of that road) in some cases gates are not considered when routing so this makes it that residents who have their destination can be routed to the area. Do you perhaps have another tag that can... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,831 | Never tag for broken navigation apps! If they ignore gates, they are buggy, report the error to the authors. access=destination does prohibit routing through the road, but it will not prohibit routing to the road, if anyone (even non-resident) decides to place his destination on that road. So if it ... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Bolt028 | Thanks for the feedback. I have removed the tag. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,831 | OK, but you still left it on the Strážna street. Anyway, I have added the access=private to all the streets inside the area blocked by the gates.It is unclear if non-resident pedestrians can go there so until then better block it for all traffic except residents. Thanks for the information... | |
| 121814675 by Bolt028 @ 2022-06-01 14:14 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Wynndale ♦59 | I notice you have done a number of edits like this. Could you explain what was wrong with the previous tagging? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Bolt028 | I added the name tag to the building which was in the adr:housename field.I cannot seem to find them without the name tag. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Polarbear-repair ♦690 | Hi Wynndale, Bolt028,that depends a bit on the situation on the ground. If the house name is used for postal purposes only, and maybe has a small sign at the letterbox, it is addr:housename Tagging as "name" would require that such a name is written in big letters at the facade.... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Bolt028 | Hi, Polarbear-repairThis is a High rise apartment building and the name of this apartment block is visible when using google maps from 2019 on the left hand side. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | Polarbear-repair ♦690 | Ok as the history of the object is older than the google map we can safely assume it is not copied from there. The names are written at the facade in several positions, larger than a street sign. I would assume that somebody living in one of these houses refers to the name colloquially, as in &q... | |
| 109872470 by Bolt028 @ 2021-08-18 12:13 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ivanbranco ♦2,871 | Hi Bolt, what's the meaning of the verdict=* tag? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Bolt028 | Hi Changeset will be reverted | |
| 109885467 by Bolt028 @ 2021-08-18 16:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,029 | Hi,you added the tag 'verdict' to many roads. This is not used in any other place. What does it mean and how is it relevant for OSM? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Bolt028 | Changesets will be reverted. | |
| 105821637 by Bolt028 @ 2021-06-04 07:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,725 | Hello,Andy from the OSM's Data Working Group here.I'm currently trying to repair the road merge problems described at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html and noticed that the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639176230 seem implausible. "... |