| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71819697 by CjMalone @ 2019-07-02 12:17 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | iwhs ♦22 | For the Yarbridge Inn, you changed 'Street' from 'Yarbridge' to 'Marshcombe Shute', which is in the next parish. Postcode look-up clearly shows 'Yarbridge, Brading, SANDOWN'.FYI, people who live around the crossroads did campaign to preserve the old hamlet n... |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | CjMalone | This is so long ago I can't remember the details, but it does look like FSA still have "Marshcombe Shute", so I probably copied it from there.https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/541080FSA was one of the only source we could use for addresses, it is self reported by the venue ... | |
| 146263214 by CjMalone @ 2024-01-14 23:41 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | phodgkin ♦75 | I'm not sure about the name change here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/54.518700/-1.502995from"Morton Park Beefeater"to"Morton Park"The latter is the branch name used on the website, but the restaurant itself would be identified as the "Morton P... |
| 174018728 by CjMalone @ 2025-10-31 12:27 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | spiregrain ♦240 | I have a question about this changeset. At number 60, you changed an addr:flats=1 to addr:unit=Flat 1; but left the addr:flats=5-12 in place (correcting my typo). But if addr:flats is correct for Flat 5, why should it be addr:unit=Flat 1 for Flat 1?I don't think either style is wrong... |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | CjMalone | (My changeset message here wasn't great, sorry).addr:flat isn't a real tag, it has very imitated usage globally, literally 290 as of 2025-10-31 00:59 UTC. And is long discouraged on the wiki.https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=addr%3Aflathttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | spiregrain ♦240 | (my changeset message wasn't brilliant either)addr:flat is a typo, it should have been addr:flats. I've always used addr:flats even if there was only one flat. I've not come across this addr:unit style for flats before. Thank you for explaining it. | |
| 167638797 by CjMalone @ 2025-06-15 07:31 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | TheNightRider ♦57 | Hi CjMalone! I saw your bulk edit and so I checked the JOANN store within walking distance to me that I had tagged about 2 months ago as about to close: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7278959378It didn't get edited. Maybe because you saw I was working on it? Anyway, I'm about to lea... |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | TheNightRider ♦57 | Survey result today: osm.org/node/7278959378 is completely empty of merchandise and only shelving remains. It could return as any type of shop, so did not use disused:shop=craft | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | PierZen ♦284 | Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. | |
| 139364694 by CjMalone @ 2023-08-02 21:04 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | dzidek23 ♦83 | Hey CJMalone,Another user reported missing bus stop (missing on the ground)https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5884897366https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4792787Is it possible that Naptan database has "ghost" entries, planned but not implemented? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | CjMalone | Another?This changeset was so long ago, but it doesn't look like I added any bus stops in it, just added the refs.I don't know of NaPTAN including planned bus stops, but it does include stops without active routes, and it includes request only stops. There is lots of complexities w... | |
| 128492995 by CjMalone @ 2022-11-04 16:57 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Hello,Are you sure that the "naptan:AtcoCode" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5784071207/history is correct? This appears to be in the museum; I'm guessing the code is for Didcot Parkway https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6605149662 .Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | CjMalone | I can't see 910GDIDCOTP in the current official data. I don't thinkhave a snap shot from 3 years ago to see what it was listed as.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6605149662#map=19/51.611220/-1.242517is correct as it currently is "9100DIDCOTP". | |
| 148605677 by CjMalone @ 2024-03-13 17:40 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | whammo ♦98 | Hi DarkDays. I see you've done a lot of these website imports. Is this documented anywhere? What is the source you're using? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Baloo Uriza ♦2,405 | Bad form to use OSM to promote homophobia. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148605677 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | CjMalone | Are you OK? Do you need a health care professional calling? | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Allison P ♦1,146 | How does this edit promote homophobia? | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | Baloo Uriza ♦2,405 | Chick-fil-A gives a lot, lot of money and uses lobbyists to promote homophobia to a degree that they're pretty synonymous. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | Allison P ♦1,146 | I don't think mapping constitutes endorsement. If it does, I've got a lot of introspection to do about mapping all the cookie-cutter subdivisions in my hometown. | |
| 141197874 by CjMalone @ 2023-09-13 08:51 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,776 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11187471738/history has shop = pet_supplies that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=pet_supplies ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet ? If yes, wha... |
| 147905456 by CjMalone @ 2024-02-25 19:37 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | osmuser63783 ♦67 | Hi, I've just discovered some wrong FHRS IDs that were added in this changeset e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3402048918 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2396871201I wonder what's happened here - were they connect when you added them and the business changed its FHRS ID ... |
| 97597482 by CjMalone @ 2021-01-16 10:07 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | JayTurnr ♦158 | This is potentially a very cool relation, does anything use it? |
| 141472652 by CjMalone @ 2023-09-19 14:39 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | Hihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6135938648/historyWhy have you revalued the network tags of some railway stations from Overground to National Rail. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Overground#Stationshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Railway_stations_served_by_London_Overgr... |
| 147951074 by CjMalone @ 2024-02-26 22:08 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Zol87 ♦48 | Thanks for all your work adding websites. Please also add addresses if you can as well. Thank you |
| 149529960 by CjMalone @ 2024-04-03 15:05 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse2 ♦495 | I've added "cuisine=pizza" to this because I think it's a fair bet :) |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Thanks | |
| 149529345 by CjMalone @ 2024-04-03 14:50 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse2 ♦495 | I don't think that "shop=mobility" is correct here. That'd be a place where you _buy_ mobility scooters. Shopmobility places tend to be tagged differently, see https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L8068 . |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | I thought amenity=shopmobility was a copy paste error. There is currently 0 cases in OSM, feel free to move back to it, or something more usable. I have no local knowledge of this so don't know if it sells things. | |
| 113964508 by CjMalone @ 2021-11-18 21:36 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,776 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313389498/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | I can't remember. | |
| 145840904 by CjMalone @ 2024-01-03 14:01 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | mapperue ♦238 | Hi,you add to this area:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49601038tag industrial=knaves_beech_industrial_estate.It would be preferable to use a tag that is already documented on OSM Wiki.What type of industry is there? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | It should have been name | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148286690Thank you | |
| 147982875 by CjMalone @ 2024-02-27 17:24 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | HBanu ♦42 | Great work!The road is digitize very well. Make sure about overlapping buildings.Thank you. |
| 148074561 by CjMalone @ 2024-02-29 22:54 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | tux67 ♦2,029 | Hi CJMalone,ich nehme mal exemplarisch dieses CS mit den Aldi Website Änderungen.Einen "Deep Link" finde ich im Sinne der Haltbarkeit (wie oft ändern Firmen ihr CMS, mit dem einhergehenden Resultat einer Änderung dieser Links gegenüber der Wahrscheinlichkeit einer &... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | tux67 ♦2,029 | sorry - I see there is a maproulette task even proposing this approach .. so I better blame maproulette .. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | If you want a generic brand website, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand:website may be a better option. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | tux67 ♦2,029 | Might be .. Annoying is only that the challenge simply overwrites existing information without the intention to keep it as still being valid and more durable than the deep link. | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | I don't see this as a loss of `brand:website`, but an improvement of `website`.Personally, I see very little value in `brand:website` when there is `brand:wikidata`. It can be auto generated.https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q41171672#P856Then it can be updated in a single place, where as... | |
| 139468526 by CjMalone @ 2023-08-05 08:01 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | I'm not sure how it happened, but quite a few of the ones added for York here were wrong. An example was https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2466092653/history , where that naptan code is actually for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2527494752 , which you can verify via http://deps.at/?32900... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | I've repressed my Naptan memories! :PIf the errors are specific for York, I suspect their data in Naptan has/had issues. It's each local authorities responsibility to update Naptan, and I'm sure some are worse than others.Taking a look at another website that shows Naptan data... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Every case with more than 1 naptan:NaptanCode or naptan:AtcoCode is suspect. It was on my TODO list to check them, but I never got far.https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/naptan%3ANaptanCode#valueshttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/naptan%3AAtcoCode#values | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Thanks - I've found a dozen or so so far (most of https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1H3d ). I'll try and scan the QR codes on the bus stops to see if I can find any way to "translate" the incorrect ones. Some are, I'm sure, just old data. | |
| 146327555 by CjMalone @ 2024-01-16 15:04 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | like 14 years old |
| 146046795 by CjMalone @ 2024-01-08 23:59 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | JezCrow ♦167 | Hi CjMalone, some of the new URLs don't seem to work. I've checked around Teesside and clicking the links on the Billingham, Teesside Park and Hartlepool Headland stores go to an "Access Denied" page. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | JezCrow ♦167 | These are node 1807386054, way 152202811 and node 684003948. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Thanks, I've fixed them. (I don't like the Morrisons website!) | |
| 145724091 by CjMalone @ 2023-12-31 09:16 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | My bad, only meant to do https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1235782028 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388519250 |
| 145257778 by CjMalone @ 2023-12-18 16:15 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | keithonearth ♦326 | Was this an automated edit? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | The edit was made using JOSM and it's Conflation plugin. | |
| 144684552 by CjMalone @ 2023-12-02 08:50 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,532 | Oh, I love me some erbsites!🤣 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144684552 |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | :) Not my most embarrassing typo, but it's here for life. | |
| 144464555 by CjMalone @ 2023-11-26 09:41 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | GOD84 ♦9 | Qajar and royal family British |
| 144378005 by CjMalone @ 2023-11-23 17:17 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | Instead of removing them could you replace them with the generic home page? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | But that isn't related to the individual object.You could add brand:website=https://www.poundland.co.uk/ but personally I don't think it's worth our time to add and maintain when it's available via Wikidata. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | It doesn't have to be related to the individual object. It's a valid, generic URL for a generic chain. It's the site used to search for individual shop details. It's much better than having no website at all.Wikidata has a poor user interface & is always at least one ex... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | If you want to change the definition of the website tag to for any generic website related to the brand. I suggest you try to get consensus with local mappers and the global tagging community. You can reach them on mailing lists and the community forum. | |
| 144447281 by CjMalone @ 2023-11-25 16:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | I was showing friends how to edit with Go Map :)Clearly not my usual editor. |
| 144345155 by CjMalone @ 2023-11-22 22:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,532 | Hello.What are you trying to indicate here by adding 2-3 year old check_date tags? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144345155 |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | That they are suspect. I couldn't find them on https://locations.99only.com/ | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,532 | n2561534359 seems to be "New Fu Xing Market II Corp", looks like some discount-ish housewares store, but def not "99only" brand.n2887579209 is "Sam's Discount 99c & Up". Also not "99only" brand. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Nice, if you have a valid source for that, make the edit. Thank you.The date I added to them was the OSM last edited, with some kind of local knowledge (not blind tag changes from iD, not building changes from aerial imagery). That can sometimes be hard to tell from the object history.The id... | |
| 144329965 by CjMalone @ 2023-11-22 14:58 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | GinaroZ ♦1,307 | Maybe worth making all the name consistent as well? :) |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | I agree, and unifying the categories. But I've been told off for that before. :/ | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | GinaroZ ♦1,307 | Well making the names all the same shouldn't be an issue... I see some are office=tax_advisor but they are surely all providing the same service, and as the wiki says that value is more specific than accountant which seems to cover everything they do (i.e. not just tax). | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | It was an issue because a mapper felt strongly that there local shop had a different name to the rest. So I just avoid that drama.NSI and iD will normalise the name and category overtime, or now I've added `brand:wikidata` someone can do it easily.https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggesti... | |
| 142479620 by CjMalone @ 2023-10-12 13:14 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Hi,How come you have removed operator:website=*If you want to standardise on using brand instead of operator then use brand:website=* |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Hey, Post Office only operate about 600 post offices, the rest are operated like a franchise system. In this edit I removed operator details related to Post Office or Royal Mail as they are incorrect.I don't think adding brand:website is useful. OSM consumers can get that automatically from... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | It is true that most most offices in the UK aren't operated by the Post Office directly. Are there any of the changes here in NI that are definitely _wrong_ - i.e. a PO branch is operated by "Post Office Limited" (the company, owned by the UK government) rather than individual franch... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | I don't know where I got the 600 number from, looking at the data again I see 114 Directly Managed Branches.https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/post_office_branch_list_and_open_3(Converted to GeoJSON for your convenience https://gist.github.com/Cj-Malone/eeab2fa7fda44fb4465efe20d106f... | |
| 143306179 by CjMalone @ 2023-10-29 10:43 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦369 | The name of this post office and the post office website link do not match, nor does the postcode with this location |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143641758 | |
| 143027342 by CjMalone @ 2023-10-23 16:59 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦369 | Another postcode error, maybe more problems as well |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143641707 | |
| 143308150 by CjMalone @ 2023-10-29 11:39 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦369 | Postcode does not match the location forhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11297570250I'm finding these through https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ and the top ones are all post offices. If you have recent familiarity with PO data, then maybe you would be best to fix thing... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Hey,Rel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143247316My clip board doesn't always work at the moment (I think it's related to Wayland).I'll go through that list and check them, I intend to do https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/distant-matches.html as wellThanks fo... | |
| 143247316 by CjMalone @ 2023-10-28 08:06 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | JezCrow ♦167 | Hi CjMalone,Not sure what was the intention of your edit here, but that postcode is over 250 miles away from here! |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Thank you, it look like my clip board let me down!Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143602201 | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | (Or user error, your choice) | |
| 143390561 by CjMalone @ 2023-10-30 22:40 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | JamJar II ♦18 | Can confirm there is no 'spoons here. Could you explain your note? |
| 140267084 by CjMalone @ 2023-08-23 09:50 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | This hasn't been a McColls since February.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125481788/historyhttps://my.morrisons.com/storefinder/31463/morrisons-daily-twerton-105-high-streetYou appear to be using old data. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125481788 seems to be tagged as a Morrisons Daily not McColl's.Am I missing something. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/125481788 | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Yes, I added 3 operator tags in v17 | |
| 139968606 by CjMalone @ 2023-08-16 14:50 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | HiThis store has been closed for over a year.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198953503 |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | Yikes, thanks. | |
| 138514343 by CjMalone @ 2023-07-14 16:02 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,776 | Thanks for a fix! |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | No worries :) | |
| 103071318 by CjMalone @ 2021-04-16 16:22 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Should https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/252673627/history perhaps be disused:highway=bus_stop if buses no longer stop there? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | CjMalone | I'm unsure if Minibus-plus still use this stop, but Southern Vectis definitely don't.Minibus-plus seems to be much more informal, and would stop anywhere. Bus stop or not. | |
| 131206199 by CjMalone @ 2023-01-12 21:56 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | UKChris ♦48 | Could you double check this edit CjMalone, as the area is post code TA22 9, not TA24 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | CjMalone | NSUL suggests "TA22 9DJ" for this spot. Thanks, updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132510406 | |
| 130806720 by CjMalone @ 2023-01-02 23:21 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | OpenStreetMapMapper ♦3 | Currys is closed?! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | CjMalone | Seems so | |
| 87122938 by CjMalone @ 2020-06-25 07:36 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | (prompted by an IRC conversation following https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123421872 )On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110265979 you've added "opening_hours:post_office=Mo-Su 06:00-23:00". Does that not strike you as a teensy bit unlikely? POL's branch finder page... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | As an aside, a quick check of local POs in POL's branch finder finds the Sunday hours plausible (closed) 6/10 cases, maybe plausible (some daytime opening) in 2/10 and completely implausible in 2/10. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | CjMalone | This is a 2 and a half year old changeset... Considering I only really started mapping in 2019 I'm sure there are lots of bad edits from around this time. I would not have added "opening_hours:post_office" now adays. I tent to stay away from shop=* amenity=post_office combinations, un... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Incidentally on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142594639 , from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87190442 , I moved the PO out to a separate node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9881914107 , but (from having a look around the last time I was in there) the opening hours look sensible. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | CjMalone | My local post office is is more complicated. It's one of the bigger ones, a real counter. PO website and pol data say Mo-Su 07:00-20:00. But the counter is signed "Main counter opening times Mo-Fr 08:30-17:30; Sa 08:30-14:30 if the main counter is not open, please use our serviced from the... | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | CjMalone | And laughably, the PO website contradicts the PO sign and Southern Coop website by saying "Please Note: Not all services are available outside of the dedicated Post Office operating hours. Please check with your local branch."I'm losing the will to live on this one, I'm going... | |
| 123421872 by CjMalone @ 2022-07-10 07:21 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | This edit is not very helpful, the information is very misleading and gives a false impression of opening hours.The opening hours of my local post office were surveyed and not armchaired from a misleading website. I can assure you the post office is not open at 20:00 or on a Sunday.The co-op ha... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | CjMalone | Cheers Phil,But I reject you labelling this a "mechanical edit". I looked at every POI in this changeset.I reject you calling this edit unhelpful. I think it has undeniably improved post offices in this area, even if there were one or 2 mistakes. Mistakes happen when humans are inv... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | My local post office https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2636954315/history had the correct opening hours and is mapped as a separate node so as you you say should have the opening hours of the counter but now has a strange version of the supermarket opening hours. Its open until 22:00.This seems t... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | I suspect most of my (no comment) changeset descriptions come from before OSM supported them. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | CjMalone | I was talking about this one, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105877402. There are plenty more bad changset descriptions: #117490994, #113128712, #113128735, #113129191, #111990185, #111990163, #https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112839818.But it's so not important, I don'... | |
| 121805274 by CjMalone @ 2022-06-01 10:29 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | CjMalone | I've requested a review, not for the alignment, but for someone to check all the link roads, connections, etc. I don't usually map this stuff so I've no idea if it's right or wrong.Bing has just been updated to show the new layout. |
| 119495871 by CjMalone @ 2022-04-09 09:11 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Artur Blaim ♦1 | Here's the step-by-step process. How to Delete Your Facebook Account Now that you've decided to delete your Facebook account, it's time to actually do it. Since deleting a Facebook account is a big deal, we're here to walk you through the entire process .https://www.themobilesa... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Thanks bro but you're about 9 years to late. | |
| 119381866 by CjMalone @ 2022-04-06 11:10 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | RaccoonFederation ♦97 | Some of them could use the name and brand tags updating too eghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358637686 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | That one does have a name and brand tag. I could do with spending some time on Morrisons Daily though, I think FHRS is unusually up to date on the McColl's -> Morrisons Daily fascia change. | |
| 118324129 by CjMalone @ 2022-03-10 13:32 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | Could you check this POI, it got a strange "sells:veg" tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9568741991 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | I think sells:veg is OK tagging, it fits with sells:tobacco and other sells:*. They aren't that popular but it's useful data. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | Tagging things on sale is fine, but what is 'veg'? vegetation? vegetarians? vegetables? | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | I think it i's clearly vegetables, but if you want to change it to sells:vegetables, I wont argue against it. | |
| 118335522 by CjMalone @ 2022-03-10 18:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | Hi,could you check this POI, it got a strange tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225186675 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Nice one, fixed the name in #118907705 | |
| 109894105 by CjMalone @ 2021-08-18 19:42 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | Not sure that Holistic Emporium is accurately tagged as shop=cosmetics (found at random following a query on IRC about "metaphysical supplies"). There are 2 tags in use which are more precise (and probably synonymous) shop=new_age (favoured in UK) and shop=esoteric (mainly DE). We have 3-... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Did you get around to documenting the tags? I have no preference, feel free to update this one. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | No, thanks for the reminder | |
| 117122175 by CjMalone @ 2022-02-07 14:25 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9486977899? What is the meaning of the key urpn_count ?By the way did you mean urpn (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=urpn) or uprn (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=uprn) |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | This is testing a new MapComplete theme. Don't worry, I'll clean up the data. | |
| 116585195 by CjMalone @ 2022-01-25 13:12 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | GinaroZ ♦1,307 | Not sure there's really a need to remove shop=vacant here... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | It's a duplicate of disused:shop. I'm trying to stop the build up of shops that shop=shoe & disused:shop=book like this:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1977957768 | |
| 79111848 by CjMalone @ 2020-01-02 12:02 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | Hi,I notice that at least one post office has been added at a post code centroid (Bwlch), which in rural Wales will inevitably be likely to be misleading. I know the PO Branches are usually more accurately located, but I think some cross-checking is needed (e.g., vs the 2 OS map layers or hints ... |
| 105212275 by CjMalone @ 2021-05-24 09:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | addr:country=GB might be true for the UK, but neither Bailiwick is part of the UK or GB; they're crown dependencies. Independent (self-governing) nations.For Jersey: *:country=JEFor Guernsey: *:country=GG |
| 112923147 by CjMalone @ 2021-10-24 22:12 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Hello,I think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380542099 might have got extended here which added a spur to the IOW coastal path.I've snipped it off in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112953889 .Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Nice one, I extended the sidewalk to a more accurate point, I guess that's what caused this. Kinda surprised JOSM didn't warn me about it. | |
| 112940327 by CjMalone @ 2021-10-25 10:33 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | I requested a review on this because it's my first time doing public transit routes.I now think my refs on the routes should have been just "27" not "Me27-x", but not that confidant on that. |
| 112501822 by CjMalone @ 2021-10-14 12:26 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | Could you check this node? It got two strange addr: tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7476019327 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Thanks, fixed in #112536091 | |
| 112407715 by CjMalone @ 2021-10-12 09:00 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | It was actually June, NSUL 2021-06. |
| 112270604 by CjMalone @ 2021-10-08 15:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦369 | Watch out for mistakes in the source data, for this:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225733760there was no space in the postcode, I've fixed it now though |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Nice one, your right was just trusting the source data in this instance.Another one that has caught me out when actually parsing postcodes is "AA1 OAA" instead of "AA1 0AA", it's actually a pretty common typeo. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦369 | I've been using https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-errors.html to look for various errors, and that sort of thing would also show up there | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | I've written a quick script to query the FHRS API and format it into GeoJSON to be loaded into JOSM and worked with. (I've now fixed it to try and fix postcodes, or warn me.)Do you have any tooling to help you work with NSUL? Or are you just using the tile layer? | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦369 | I've just been using the tile layer so far, but it's not feeling very efficient, so I might see what I can do.There are probably a very large number of buildings with house numbers with a single point inside them from the NSUL set with a postcode that could be added (with appropriate che... | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | I've got a few ideas on how we could make adding postcodes and UPRNs from NSUL more efficient.If I ever get around to it, I'll let you know. | |
| 111241433 by CjMalone @ 2021-09-15 11:54 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | The details for hotels with grounds, goes on the boundary polygon, similar to schools, as hotels can have multiple buildings.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51537062 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | I think for existing ones, I've done that. If I added any duplicates as nodes, let me know and I'll fix them. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119825801 | |
| 110847575 by CjMalone @ 2021-09-07 09:38 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | Hi,the zoo got a strange tag "operator:companieshouse = 10238727"Could you check that? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | It was by design, I feel like I've used it before too.https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10238727 | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | According to Taginfo this is the very first time the key appeared in OSM.I found 1x ref:companies_house and2x operator:companies_house | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Changed to operator:companies_house in #111161334 | |
| 110333355 by CjMalone @ 2021-08-27 10:31 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | spiregrain ♦240 | Is it open then? Brilliant! |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | It's listed in FHRS, it shouldn't be listed there (significantly) before opening.https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1389153I did have bit of an ulterior motive, being that it was contradicting itself as being tagged as an disused amenity as well as an amenity. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | (local?) news has it as opening today, so perfectly timed. :)https://www.timeout.com/london/news/a-first-look-inside-londons-first-wendys-082721 | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | spiregrain ♦240 | Thanks! On my way out last night, I noticed that the banners on Great Eastern Road have changed from "coming soon" to "now open", so it's all lined up! | |
| 107611992 by CjMalone @ 2021-07-08 07:32 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | Thanks; I'll try to re-survey next week once it's stopped raining and I've caught up on messages.I should've mentioned, in the note, that on survey-day the gate (to that part of the site) was closed, otherwise I would've gone had a look. Seemed easier for addition from a... |
| 107197045 by CjMalone @ 2021-06-30 09:43 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | Some of these are not building=house. See (for example) way #959722227 & changeset #107217607.I didn't manage to survey the row on the northern side (Grosvenor Street), but while they do look residential, they're not necessarily a house (at least some appear to be closer to apartme... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Fair enough. The northern row looks like a typical English terrace where 99% are houses, and the odd one is apartments. I lack the local knowledge for Jersey to make that assumption, so I'll be stronger on the building=yes here in future.The source tags on way 959722227 are excessive. OSM i... | |
| 107032827 by CjMalone @ 2021-06-27 11:44 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | BCNorwich ♦5,144 | Hi, Just wanted to point out an anomaly. It looks like this changeset has orthogonalized the outer line (Way: 936644516) of a multipolygon.I'm not sure how or why, but to check I temporarily reverted this changeset wholly and the multipolygon reinstated its original shape. So it must be thi... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Looks like you didn't actually revert this, thank you. I'll fix w936644516 on its own. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | Thanks, fixed in #107079277 | |
| 104885377 by CjMalone @ 2021-05-18 10:58 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Ted Pottage ♦25 | Good morningI note that among this change set the edit (ia it automated) has deleted the Wheelchair Accessibility tags for Lloyds in Reigate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/583252475/history This data is used by Wheelmap and has associated images. https://wheelmap.org/nodes/583252475 Plea... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | This was intended, that Lloyd's has closed. The current status of accessibility is unknown to me and any new shops that take its place are likely to make changes to be accessible. Do note that wheelchair and wheelchair:description used to contradict each other. | |
| 105095863 by CjMalone @ 2021-05-21 14:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | Thankyou for adding this. Routing algorithms should now be less confused 🙂. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | No worries | |
| 103758973 by CjMalone @ 2021-04-28 08:43 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | CjMalone | The persons only other edit was reverted too. |
| 102888771 by CjMalone @ 2021-04-13 21:14 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | Hi,you're using the term 'e_scooter' here - what type of vehicle does it refer to? 'Scooter' is an ambiguous term, it can be used for kick-scooters as well as mopeds. We're still looking for some reasonable terms for keys here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pro... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | According to that wiki page they would be classed as "small_electric_vehicle". If there is consensus, feel free to change it, but as it stands most tags are in British English, and this feels like the best key to me. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | We're still discussing... Would be nice to collect some more opinions on the discussion page in the Wiki - feel free to participate!British English has this problem as well. The Oxford Dictionary defines 'scooter' like a moped or childrens kick-scooter, while Merriam-Webster name... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | That shouldn't read "British English" up there, sorry. What I wanted to write, it seems like many (including British) people have a "natural feeling" what a scooter is - either one or the other type of vehicle - and are surprised to hear that this is different for other peop... | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Issues like this have come up before, my opinion is that the definition is what's important not the key, and that editors should start abstracting away from key/value towards localised options.Honestly from the talk page I kind of like scooter_the_big_one and scooter_the_small_one. Where in... | |
| 101070030 by CjMalone @ 2021-03-15 18:40 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦369 | Something seems to have gone wrong with the postcodes on these, can you retrieve the data? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Doesn't look like there is anything to retrieve, removed in #102518337. Thank you | |
| 101170073 by CjMalone @ 2021-03-17 08:17 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I've used the English name over the Welsh because other objects in the area seem to prefer English. |
| 99406532 by CjMalone @ 2021-02-16 21:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | UKChris ♦48 | Hi CjMalone,I would have thought that "Hungry Horse" would be the brand data for this pub / Inn, as Wacky Warehouse is a play area within the pub itself? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Yeah, you're probably right, and Wacky Warehouse should be a separate POI or a child tag of the pub. | |
| 97993748 by CjMalone @ 2021-01-22 19:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | What proof have you that there are toilets other than disabled at the locations you've amended?You didn't conclude the discussion on this subject on Talk:GB. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | toilets=yes does not imply there are inaccessible toilets. | |
| 96854873 by CjMalone @ 2021-01-03 16:35 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I've requested a review as this is my first time mapping a roundabout. Also I may have got the road types wrong.Used Esri World Imagery not Bing. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | The roundabout mapping is fine. The only suggestion I would make is that due to the new development the landuse needs to be adjusted.Cheers Phil | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I don't have any local knowledge on this, but presumably a building that size is a warehouse.So landuse=industrial? | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Could be industrial but more likely commercial but certainly not farmland. If not sure I would simply align the farmland to its new boundary and leave this area clear of landuse so that it can be filled in later.Cheers Phil | |
| 88097523 by CjMalone @ 2020-07-16 16:17 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | Despite what the Name Suggestion Index says & indeed the corporate website, many Harvesters are food-led pubs rather than restaurants. If a pub tag has been there for a long time it suggests that this is a consensus decision. For instance The Royal in Hanwell was always felt distinctly a pub (it... |
| 96028325 by CjMalone @ 2020-12-17 21:18 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Sorry about the bbox on this, seems I committed some building edits on the Isle of Wight too. |
| 95506950 by CjMalone @ 2020-12-08 19:11 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | RathcooleRambler ♦10 | The main road of a car park should still be listed as a service road. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | OK, thanks for catching this.I think w626708212 is both a parking isle and service exit to the drive through. I guess because it's both the more generic (just service) takes priority? That makes sense.w626708210 defiantly starts off as a service road, but I think I'd argue that it ... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | RathcooleRambler ♦10 | I considered that when I was looking at it myself, but I veered towards it being a service road rather than parking aisle. If you decide to change the section where it splits from the drivethru then I won't have any qualms, though. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I'll leave it for a more local mapper decide, or one some better imagery becomes available.Happy mapping | |
| 95500110 by CjMalone @ 2020-12-08 16:40 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | Josm doesnt have great support for full range of solar tags, but there are plenty of examples about to copy from. I've added the typical tags. In general we use generator as you have in this case for these smaller solar farms, although there is an increasing tendency to map the inividual arrays... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Thanks for fixing this!I thought I read somewhere that all the solar farms in GB had been mapped, hence why I was surprised to see one. Unless its just the larger power=plant, that are completely mapped. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | I think the cut-off was around 1 MW. There are quite a lot of other installations in repd but Jez wasnt interested in them initially. At some stage we'll probably start going through them. As a consequence this cut-off is also pretty much the effective limit for power=plant. Also not every one ... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Ah makes sense, if I get my head around the tagging scheme I may give you a hand with the remainder, or some below 1MW. | |
| 94023852 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-13 00:07 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please check https://www.osm.org/way/490035419: you add a wrong email address. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I didn't add that email address, I was fixing data issues with the building. The invalid email was already present in OSM. | |
| 94917170 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-27 23:11 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,745 | Interesting - never noticed allotments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878430449 before when walking past the north or the south. Certainly looks like it from the imagery though - has the characteristic sheds and parked cars. I'll see if I can see a name when I am next in the area. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Awesome, thank you. | |
| 94370951 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-18 14:27 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | thetornado76 ♦180 | Hello,I guess you misspelled the value for semi-detached houses. It should read building=semidetached_house.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dsemidetached_houseBest regards thetornado76 |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Well... fuck.Thanks for catching this, seems it's a mistake I've been making for a while.I think I've fixed it in the following changesets. Thank you.#94456583#94456629#94456672#94456717 | |
| 94378975 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-18 16:17 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:ref:GB:uprn |
| 94212877 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-16 16:03 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I received permission from the Managing Director, Richard Dance to use data from the website. |
| 94212776 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-16 16:01 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I received permission from the Managing Director, Richard Dance to use data from the website. |
| 94212616 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-16 15:58 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I received permission from the Managing Director, Richard Dance to use data from the website. |
| 94212153 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-16 15:51 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I received permission from the Managing Director, Richard Dance to use data from the website. |
| 94212309 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-16 15:53 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I received permission from the Managing Director, Richard Dance to use data from the website. |
| 94211890 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-16 15:47 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I received permission from the Managing Director, Richard Dance to use data from the website. |
| 94211625 by CjMalone @ 2020-11-16 15:42 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I received permission from the Managing Director, Richard Dance to use data from the website. |
| 93296450 by CjMalone @ 2020-10-30 14:34 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Submarine gave me permission to add there defib data set into OSM.https://api.submarine.gg/DefibLocator/Locations.jsonCould do with a bit of clean up for exact locations and more contextual location descriptions. |
| 91181030 by CjMalone @ 2020-09-20 16:23 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | iwhs ♦22 | Hi, I don't know what changes you made to the Sandown Shanklin Yaverland Bus Route relation, but it's anything but right now. Firstly, this relation combines the Nos 22 and 24 routes into one. Secondly, bits are missing: I know that Lake Green, Knighton and AlverstoneGV are no longer serve... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Looking at the history Vespucci automatically edits the relations to remove the nodes I deleted, so I don't think I broke it any more than it was already was :PI was deleting bus stops along Manor Road, Lea Road and New Road I don't know when the bus route changed but there are no stop... | |
| 89857724 by CjMalone @ 2020-08-24 12:19 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I'd like a review as this is my first turn restrictions.See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79851825 |
| 89846126 by CjMalone @ 2020-08-24 09:16 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Poorly tagged and seems to be a home office anyway, doubt it belongs in OSM anyway without the copyright issues. |
| 87243345 by CjMalone @ 2020-06-28 08:10 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Hi, this is a residential area. It seems unlikely that there is a verifiable business here.If I was a neighbour I would be very cross indeed if my quiet close was full of customers cars.These businesses tend to be phone/internet and do not belong in OSM.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | The website given describes this as a "boutique studio", that sounds like customers come here. So I would argue it does belong in OSM.It's probably more of a living room type situation, and only open by appointment, but that is pure speculation I don't have a source for that. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | The key to adding things to OSM is that they are verifiable. I seriously doubt that there is a sign that someone passing would see.Also the area covered indicates that this is a visiting service, if it was a shop why would they care? What have people from Mountsorrel, Groby or Glenfield done not... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | OSM is a map, and if somebody looks for directions to "Cosmetology Hub" and doesn't find it they will be disappointed/use another map.Maybe using `shop=beauty` is wrong? | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Then they should navigate to the address as they would for any other domestic dwelling.We should in these cases map what is verifiable and that is likely to be only the housenumbers.If I am a map user who is looking for the footpath at the end of the road and they expect to pass Cosmetology ... | |
| 6 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | > any other domestic dwellingThis doesn't seem to be domestic, everything points to it being commercial.> expect to pass Cosmetology HubWe have no information it say it isn't signed, and there is a fix me for mappers.> Notes like this should not be acted upon unt... | |
| 7 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | It has been suggested that it would be better tagged as craft=beautician.> This doesn't seem to be domestic, > everything points to it being commercial.Aerial imagery and local knowledge indicate it is a residential area. Planning practice does not include business premises in su... | |
| 8 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | > verifiable businessHow does OSM map adult shops? They are often banned from having any window decoration/don't have any fascia. Are they excluded from OSM?I think it's a beauty shop, by appointment only. It probably doesn't have any fascia, and I don't think that shoul... | |
| 9 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | > How does OSM map adult shops? They > are often banned from having any window> decoration/don't have any fascia. > Are they excluded from OSM?They are not excluded from OSM because they are easily verifiable. They have signs with a name and the words 'Licensed Adult Sh... | |
| 10 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Why do you keep commenting on the neighbours? What has it got to do with the neighbours if someone starts a business?> 'Licensed Adult Shop' displayed on them.Your example just says "private". As does the one I checked. I can't verify either is an adult shop, just... | |
| 85934650 by CjMalone @ 2020-05-29 09:35 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I actually used "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" not Bing |
| 84824446 by CjMalone @ 2020-05-07 10:16 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | EdLoach ♦177 | This should be in the opposite corner, really. I might move it when I get a moment (I shop there quite often, though have never been to the café). |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | It would be awesome if you could place it more accurately. Thank you. | |
| 85134324 by CjMalone @ 2020-05-13 09:20 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Look to be in the wrong location -- are these just copied from a copyrighted website? Does OSM have a licence from ASDA? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Asda has given permission for data from there website to be used in OSM.See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/CjMalone/diary/392901 | |
| 84510105 by CjMalone @ 2020-05-02 08:18 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I used Esri World Imagery to add this petrol station |
| 84272407 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-28 14:09 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I also used edubase/get-information-schools.service.gov.uk as a source. |
| 84144501 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-26 14:23 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I used Bing imagery to trace this building |
| 84059175 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-24 11:45 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Hi, when adding details to an object they should refer to that object rather than the brand.For example you have added facebook and twitter details for ASDA when the local object has both and these should be used.Also whilst adding these details wouldn't a phone number be more useful?... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | Hello,I have been adding accurate website tags to Asda, replacing generic links, and no links, to branch specific ones.Sorry, if I removed more accurate social media tags for generic brand tags, that wasn't my intention. tbh I didn't even know each store had it's own social me... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | CjMalone | I do want to start a discussion about importing phone numbers, and opening times though.Technology wise it's easy, once I've finished manually matching stores to the website.Copyright wise, I think we are OK. | |
| 83994592 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-23 10:22 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | Actual source is FHRS Open Data |
| 83811360 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-20 09:28 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | This is actually adding FHRS data, with a source "FHRS Open Data".Accidentality had the wrong commit data in JOSM. |
| 83601821 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-15 16:01 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | Correction, FHRS shares the postcode from CodePoint, but I'm leaving it as it was in OSM and how the business website says. |
| 83380027 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-10 19:25 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | JezCrow ♦167 | Hi CjMalone,addr:city=Saltburn ??? I'm assuming OSM copies RM's 'post towns' for addr:city fields? I know I'm relatively new to the project, but it seems to me that just because a private company uses a town 10 miles away for its address database doesn't mean OSM shou... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | My goal with this was to add the postcode, and secondarily the FHRS id, so truthfully I didn't pay much attention to the city.However FHRS (https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/243858) suggests addr:village=Staithes, addr:city=Saltburn.Post Office Ltd for a nearby Post Office in M... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | JezCrow ♦167 | Ahh, I didn't realise there was other options like addr:village because the wiki only mentions addr:city for the place name. Thanks. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | I only know about because I've seen it used, primarily on Post Offices. Wiki slightly mentions it on a talk page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:addr#Key_addr:village_introduced) and TagInfo shows it's in use (https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/keys/addr%3Avill... | |
| 83379171 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-10 18:56 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | Please do not delete valid data. amenity=pub/supermarket belong on the boundary way which encompasses all land owned by those companies. Similar to schools.i hope you haven't removed other examples elsewhere. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | DaveF ♦1,627 | Larkhall is not the city. Have you considered editing only in your area where you'll have local knowledge? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | The wiki for Tag:shop=supermarket says area along the "shop outline". Not like Tag:landuse=retail that says "an area containing the whole of the retail area: the shops and car parks." or Tag:amenity=school that says "Mark the boundary of the school" So I think it should... | |
| 83298848 by CjMalone @ 2020-04-09 09:45 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | In 83267160 I accidentality added source:addr to every poi I edited. Even when the address was already provided by other sources. I correctly used the source tag on the changeset, and there is the argument that it should be on the changeset and not the poi anyway. |
| 82301794 by CjMalone @ 2020-03-17 12:12 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | Can someone please check St Monica Primary School. This is the first time I've made a relation. |
| 78639467 by CjMalone @ 2019-12-19 13:25 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | You removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224095678 in a task described as adding KFC brand tags. Do you have specific local knowledge that this branch has closed? It appears both in Food Hygiene data and on KFC's website (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224095678).Either way plea... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | way 224095678 was a way without a building tag. I added the tags to the existing building. I didn't delete this KFC, simply delete a duplicate way. | |
| 79079536 by CjMalone @ 2020-01-01 12:20 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | EdLoach ♦177 | Thanks |
| 76853285 by CjMalone @ 2019-11-09 20:08 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | Well... this needs reverting |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | Reverted in 76853499 | |
| 76086560 by CjMalone @ 2019-10-23 07:52 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | Hi,you introduced a new tag here, 'payment:self_checkout'.On the other hand, the tag 'self_checkout' is already used 50 times and has an entry in the Wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:self_checkoutWould you mind changing that?Jan |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | CjMalone | Hey, I followed a proposed spec, but I will swap for the in use one.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/payment:self_checkout | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,048 | Proposals and actual tagging practice... not the only place where they are different. I put a remark on the discussion page of the proposal.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/payment:self_checkout |