| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66189905 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-01-10 10:24 | 1 | 2019-02-02 14:58 | daveemtb ♦28 | Hi, was it intentional to remove natural=heath from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400515190 ?Seems strange that this way should be left with no tags. |
| 2 | 2022-09-22 14:46 | Russ McD ♦223 | I noticed this too, and with no response , and the mapper doing nothing for 3 years, have added the heath tag back in and moved the boundary to where its looks correct. | |
| 66389196 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-01-17 09:32 | 1 | 2021-09-28 19:44 | VictorIE ♦903 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664082792#map=19/53.16471/-6.91662What do building:levels=-0.5 and roof:levels=0.8 represent? |
| 75151613 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-10-01 13:24 | 1 | 2019-11-18 22:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Not sure how it happened, but I suspect that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725365453 was just someone trolling someone else. I've re-added it as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746786370 , is that OK?Best Regards,Andy |
| 71099234 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-10 11:41 | 1 | 2019-06-11 11:37 | trigpoint ♦2,371 | What does TIDBO mean? |
| 2 | 2019-06-12 12:04 | trigpoint ♦2,371 | Please reply using the changeset comment feature to keep discussions visible to the community.PM recieved"Here’s all you need to know about Tidbo. www.tidbo.com"However that does not explain what #tidbo has to do with editing OSM but it does suggest that you should be followi... | |
| 3 | 2019-06-13 07:35 | DHP11 CDW | Hi Phil;Apologies - you asked me what TIDBO meant, not what it has to do with OSM. The Directed Editing policies are deprecated, and no longer apply. The suitable guidelines to follow for activities such as ours are now referred to as Organised Editing.We do have an Organised Editing Wiki... | |
| 4 | 2019-06-13 07:41 | trigpoint ♦2,371 | Thank you.However you should have something on your profile that explains what you are doing and links to your wiki page. As do Amazon, Kaart, Mapbox etc.At the point of asking the first question I had no idea your edits fell within the organised editing policy.Cheers Phil | |
| 5 | 2019-06-14 14:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | (for the avoidance of any doubt) the relevant document is actually at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines . @DHP11 CDW Thanks for trying to "do the right thing". As Phil's already mentioned it would help people understand what was going on if there if th... | |
| 71100621 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-10 12:25 | 1 | 2019-06-10 18:55 | ndm ♦889 | You deleted a building and its associated address information -- could you please add it back as soon as possible -- if it's too difficult I can revert it all for you. |
| 70983844 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 10:05 | 1 | 2019-06-06 21:57 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70983634 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 09:58 | 1 | 2019-06-06 21:45 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70983573 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 09:56 | 1 | 2019-06-06 21:38 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70983222 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 09:46 | 1 | 2019-06-06 21:31 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70983121 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 09:42 | 1 | 2019-06-06 21:28 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70982124 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 09:09 | 1 | 2019-06-06 21:14 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70982008 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 09:06 | 1 | 2019-06-06 21:01 | ndm ♦889 | Note:fixed |
| 70981251 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:46 | 1 | 2019-06-06 20:37 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70981040 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:40 | 1 | 2019-06-06 20:27 | ndm ♦889 | Note:fixed |
| 70980998 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:39 | 1 | 2019-06-06 20:17 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70980894 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:35 | 1 | 2019-06-06 19:54 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70980694 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:29 | 1 | 2019-06-06 19:18 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70980619 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:27 | 1 | 2019-06-06 19:14 | ndm ♦889 | Note:fixed |
| 70980367 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:20 | 1 | 2019-06-06 19:10 | ndm ♦889 | Note:fixed |
| 70980104 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:11 | 1 | 2019-06-06 19:00 | ndm ♦889 | Note: fixed |
| 70979862 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-06-06 08:03 | 1 | 2019-06-06 18:45 | ndm ♦889 | Note: Fixed. |
| 70187957 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-05-13 11:33 | 1 | 2019-06-06 18:36 | ndm ♦889 | Note to self: fix changesets after this. |
| 66602838 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-01-24 14:03 | 1 | 2019-05-03 07:05 | BCNorwich ♦4,845 | Hi, I've amended several building part outlines that had self intersections. I made them into two part multipolygons. This now properly shows the areas without self intersection of any lines. This method avoids self intersection which is an incorrect method.Regards Bernard |
| 69228589 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-04-15 09:56 | 1 | 2019-05-02 07:49 | BCNorwich ♦4,845 | Hi, there are self intersections to Way: 683885522 |
| 69520379 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-04-24 10:28 | 1 | 2019-04-30 07:58 | BCNorwich ♦4,845 | These terrace blocks are drawn incorrectly, they do not properly reflect the building footprint. Way: 685612268 does not show that each house has a recess to the rear. Further when drawn in this manner it is difficult to later terrace the block into individual houses so that addresses can be eas... |
| 69593835 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-04-26 10:09 | 1 | 2019-04-26 10:47 | BCNorwich ♦4,845 | Hi, it looks like your use of the level tag is somewhat astray. The level tag is used to show a particular level with regard to other levels, it is not a tag with which to define height or relevant height. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levelsIf this is a bungalow th... |
| 68287064 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-19 09:36 | 1 | 2019-03-19 19:30 | ndm ♦889 | Partially reverted the Oaktree Crescent and footpath nodes -- moved ~1 mile, see https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=68287064 |
| 68258853 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-18 13:38 | 1 | 2019-03-18 20:20 | ndm ♦889 | I've added back the information you deleted in error. |
| 68255764 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-18 11:56 | 1 | 2019-03-18 12:43 | ndm ♦889 | How are you determining building heights?If you can't cite a suitable information source, then I will delete them all. |
| 66625484 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-01-25 09:12 | 1 | 2019-03-15 14:18 | safirat ♦3 | Hello Chris - marking a building is complete with an enclosing polygon. A rectangle for instance. Please explain the benefits of the double enclosing we see here. If you plan to enhance its visibility in the map, ist surely the wrong way. In this case please reduce the building to its outline. |
| 68142410 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-14 16:07 | 1 | 2019-03-14 18:50 | ndm ♦889 | You've deleted the Capricorn building - please add all the information back. |
| 2 | 2019-03-14 18:51 | ndm ♦889 | Here's a link with all of the info https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17239182/history | |
| 3 | 2019-03-14 18:52 | ndm ♦889 | Apologies Parkgate building. | |
| 4 | 2019-03-15 12:52 | ndm ♦889 | The address and other information is still missing please add it back - or I can easily roll the version back for you to yesterday. | |
| 68136085 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-14 12:59 | 1 | 2019-03-14 19:35 | ndm ♦889 | JOSM validator flags building:part and building are the same |
| 68139463 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-14 14:37 | 1 | 2019-03-14 18:54 | ndm ♦889 | Nodes shouldn't have a roof:shape. |
| 2 | 2019-03-14 18:54 | ndm ♦889 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6337914862 | |
| 68136929 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-14 13:22 | 1 | 2019-03-14 13:41 | ndm ♦889 | Try Esri clarity it's a lot sharper than Bing - as recommended on the Bristol section of the wiki. May have to pay with zoom. |
| 68136592 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-14 13:13 | 1 | 2019-03-14 13:23 | ndm ♦889 | Looks like a bad house number survey - there's more two 92 and three 90 - Dewfalls Drive which seems odd. |
| 68096910 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-13 11:56 | 1 | 2019-03-13 12:35 | ndm ♦889 | Still needs a proper comment "Adding building heights" would be something close to acceptable.If it's metres you don't add m - only if not.If you're mapping for commercial purposes as part of your job you need to show that on your Osm user page with contact email etc |
| 2 | 2019-03-13 20:09 | ndm ♦889 | https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf | |
| 68096340 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-13 11:38 | 1 | 2019-03-13 11:43 | southglos ♦120 | Er, that's 200m taller than the Shard, and would make this the tallest building in the UK by quite some margin. |
| 68054682 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-03-12 09:27 | 1 | 2019-03-12 13:19 | ndm ♦889 | What does osm1 mean / as a useful change set comment? Why are building levels fractional - most houses here are two storey. |
| 66388328 by DHP11 CDW @ 2019-01-17 09:00 | 1 | 2019-01-19 05:24 | kartonage ♦987 | Hey Chris Walden,I think you should not try to facilitate too much height estimation into building:levels. Building:levels as a key is a very simple method and trying to cut it down to decimals is somewhat not quite \tmeaningful. I have seen you add 0.6 values for buildings. Which basically means ... |