| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64255695 by DHP11 MDS @ 2018-11-07 09:08 | 1 | 2022-02-22 20:41 | jambamkin ♦81 | Hello DHP11 MDS, You added a building height to /way/618561074, but from aerial this does not look like a building. Do you recall what it looks like on the ground? |
| 76217007 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-10-25 15:17 | 1 | 2019-11-20 10:02 | PuffinMapper ♦18 | Hallo DHP11 MDSBitte beachten, dass es im Kanton Zürich wesentlich bessere offizielle offene Quelle als Bing aerial gibt, um Gebäude zu verbessern.Die amtliche Vermessung steht offen zur Verfügung und zeigt die Grundrisse sehr genau. So dass auch in OSM die Grundrisse und nicht ... |
| 77121982 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-11-15 11:26 | 1 | 2019-11-15 22:18 | sak3112 ♦2 | The changes made to Derbyshire Constabulary and Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service HQ are incorrect. The buildings shown on the Bing aerial imagery layer have been demolished and rebuilt on a new footprint |
| 2 | 2019-11-18 10:18 | DHP11 MDS | I'll rectify that as soon as I am able | |
| 64115642 by DHP11 MDS @ 2018-11-02 14:51 | 1 | 2019-08-25 20:15 | murble ♦26 | Hi, Just wondering why you've deleted many objects to create new ones at the same location but lacking in house numbers, postcodes etc? You also appear to be changing the building:levels, The houses you've put in as 1.5 are all 2 stories above ground level. |
| 2 | 2019-08-28 07:34 | DHP11 MDS | Hi Murble, i do apologies as the 1.5 levels we used were the measurements we needed to use to get the 3D models to look as accurate as possible as the 2 Levels made the buildings look taller then they were.as for replacing the buildings this was down to my own inexperience at the time using OSM ... | |
| 71363458 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-06-18 12:06 | 1 | 2019-06-18 12:08 | DHP11 MDS | I accidently used the wrong changeset info, the correct infor is:added roof,building levels and building part tagsupdated coral tags. i do appologise |
| 71106087 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-06-10 14:52 | 1 | 2019-06-10 18:44 | ndm ♦889 | Buildings have been deleted and replaced with building:part -- can you please fix urgently. Also outlines now don't seem to correspond to ESRI clarity -- buildings are too big -- looks like you are drawing into the shadow somehow. |
| 2 | 2019-06-11 07:38 | DHP11 MDS | the buildings havent been deleted, they are still there | |
| 3 | 2019-06-11 15:27 | DHP11 MDS | if I have deleted buildings, could you please be more specific on which ones? | |
| 4 | 2019-06-11 19:01 | ndm ♦889 | I have raised a ticket https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17802 -- if I filter out building:part items they still hide the real building (presumably underneath). | |
| 5 | 2019-06-11 19:38 | ndm ♦889 | Actually it looks like you added building:part items -- but didn't put a building around them. E.g. the diagonal ones NE of the church. Strangely, OSM map renders them -- but maybe other renderers won't? Not sure how that affects 3D stuff. | |
| 6 | 2019-06-12 07:45 | DHP11 MDS | I placed a building part over the buildings, unfortunatly it didnt do the building part as it is marked.its a issue we have when houses are marked seperately and they have hipped roofs, if we mark them as a whole then the roof comes out correctly, otherwise it puts on 2 hipped roofswe use the... | |
| 71102275 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-06-10 13:10 | 1 | 2019-06-10 18:39 | ndm ♦889 | You've deleted a large chunk of a building - could you please fix it - or if you can't I can easily revert the changeset. |
| 2 | 2019-06-11 07:37 | DHP11 MDS | If you look at it on Bing view and cross reference with Google earth the building isnt there anymore and has a car park | |
| 3 | 2019-06-11 19:14 | ndm ♦889 | You can't use Google Earth to edit OSM -- and you/Licence Working Group would have to remove all edits using it.Luckily "Maxar Premium Imagery" shows new configuration of the building - I've tweaked it to use that. | |
| 71107013 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-06-10 15:17 | 1 | 2019-06-10 18:48 | ndm ♦889 | Most of the buildings need a "building=yes" tag |
| 2 | 2019-06-11 07:44 | DHP11 MDS | the buildings already have the house tag or the appartment tag, the building parts are just placed on top of them.please check stuff before complaining about every little detail | |
| 3 | 2019-06-11 18:59 | ndm ♦889 | I've raised a ticket https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17802 | |
| 71107436 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-06-10 15:29 | 1 | 2019-06-10 18:49 | ndm ♦889 | Needs a building=yes and an outline. |
| 70879971 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-06-03 10:09 | 1 | 2019-06-03 10:46 | ndm ♦889 | Please add back the building details you deleted. |
| 2 | 2019-06-03 12:38 | DHP11 MDS | I havent deleted any impostant details or any major changes, i just adjusted to what i can see on the map and information provided. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-03 12:38 | DHP11 MDS | *important | |
| 4 | 2019-06-03 13:26 | ndm ♦889 | That's fine I can just revert or then | |
| 64436586 by DHP11 MDS @ 2018-11-13 10:21 | 1 | 2019-05-03 07:09 | BCNorwich ♦4,845 | Self intersection removed |
| 68096969 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-03-13 11:58 | 1 | 2019-03-18 19:12 | ndm ♦889 | roof:levels=10 seems wrong |
| 64289292 by DHP11 MDS @ 2018-11-08 11:29 | 1 | 2019-03-15 14:21 | safirat ♦3 | Hello MDSimpson - what does a fractured number mean describing the storeys of a building? 2.55, is it 2 full heights plus one half and a bit? ;-) Please find out the level and repair - thanks! |
| 68098035 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-03-13 12:30 | 1 | 2019-03-13 12:33 | ndm ♦889 | If it's metres you don't add m - only if not.If you're mapping for commercial purposes as part of your job you need to show that on your Osm user page with contact email etc |
| 2 | 2019-03-13 12:41 | southglos ♦120 | Also, the building height includes the roof; you can't have a 4m-high building with a 13m-high roof. | |
| 3 | 2019-03-13 12:48 | DHP11 MDS | i accidently put the wrong values for roof and building height, corrected it now | |
| 4 | 2019-03-13 20:10 | ndm ♦889 | https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf | |
| 68098647 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-03-13 12:49 | 1 | 2019-03-13 19:56 | ndm ♦889 | Looks like the roofs at ground level? https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.5472622&lon=-2.5945412&zoom=20&camera.theta=77.708&camera.phi=135.103 |
| 68059874 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-03-12 12:13 | 1 | 2019-03-12 12:29 | southglos ♦120 | HiThere's a lot of building:levels=1.5 on what I would guess are normal 2-storey houses; is that intentional?Cheers |
| 2 | 2019-03-12 12:48 | DHP11 MDS | Hi southglosim not familiar with the area and i was told that measuring a building level of high was to be done in 0.75 for each floor, if this is incorrect i appologise | |
| 3 | 2019-03-12 13:19 | southglos ♦120 | No idea where that 0.75 comes from. If it's 2-storey (plus roof), as a usual house would be, it's building:levels=2. A 100-storey skyscraper would be 100, not 75.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levelsandhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_building... | |
| 4 | 2019-03-12 13:24 | DHP11 MDS | Ill leave the fields blank from now on, i appologise again if the information ive given is inaccurate.and yes all this is been done by aerial viewpoint only | |
| 68060966 by DHP11 MDS @ 2019-03-12 12:45 | 1 | 2019-03-12 13:15 | ndm ♦889 | Would be really good if you could follow the local mapping style and split into individual dwellings. Just adding large blocks (like on Bedminster) isn't quite as useful. |