| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 181132620 by Dawesy @ 2026-04-10 08:21 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | gurglypipe ♦1,054 | Hiya, this change covers half of England. It’s better to keep edits small and local if possible. What features are you removing from trails, and why? Thanks :) |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | Dawesy | I do normally keep edits to more local areas but 1/2 way through this I was asked a question about Fountains Abbey so jumped a round a little. The edits are to remove car parks, cafe's, toilets from Trail relations, as they cause errors on routing etc. The were captured as part of an organised ... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | gurglypipe ♦1,054 | If they were included in the relation using an appropriate role for the member then I don't see a reason to remove them. What errors were being seen and in what app?From a quick look these all look like National Trust walking routes, and I believe they want to highlight the recommended toil... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | gurglypipe ♦1,054 | I’m minded to revert this change as you’re removing useful information from the map for (presumably?) the sake of one data consumer. Although without answers to the questions above it’s hard to be sure. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | Dawesy | Please don't do that. I am working with the National Trust Path and Trails Team https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths that added this information and it is causing issues. Specifically it cause the GPX files to be useless from https://hiking.wayma... | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | gurglypipe ♦1,054 | So what’s the plan for fixing the information so it is useful and doesn’t break waymarkedtrails.org? | |
| 7 | ~ 25 days ago | Dawesy | We are currently reviewing how to best represent this information, I believe you were part of the conversation last year as how the Parking role etc. could be used. Our understanding is that this has not been adopted as a standard tag. I think this is an area where more work is required, but for n... | |
| 8 | ~ 25 days ago | gurglypipe ♦1,054 | > Our understanding is that this has not been adopted as a standard tag. The `parking` role is documented as a de-facto standard tag for route=hiking relations on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3DhikingThere aren’t currently role values for cafes or toilets as far as ... | |
| 176640416 by Dawesy @ 2025-12-30 17:47 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | DaveF ♦1,636 | Why have you relocated a designated PROW to a location it doesn't exist?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368693103#map=18/51.417295/-2.300092Image show PROW location in blue https://snipboard.io/L2zAy6.jpg |
| 125950282 by Dawesy @ 2022-09-08 16:25 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | DaveF ♦1,636 | HiIf the gate is on a PROW, how can access be private?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10009460327 |
| 75801775 by Dawesy @ 2019-10-16 20:52 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | DaveF ♦1,636 | Why have you marked this path as non accessible? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | DaveF ♦1,636 | Dawesy went to private email | |
| 69020639 by Dawesy @ 2019-04-08 19:42 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | DaveF ♦1,636 | HiIs this way not a BOAT any more?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95095125It used to have the red way sign arrow at the western end. |