2 Changesets created by EB50 have been discussed with 2 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
164735291
by EB50
@ 2025-04-09 17:20
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agotekim
♦697
Again, regarding the access tag: the way you have tagged this trail (access=discouraged) may be interpreted as anyone can use this trail with any mode of travel, but it is "discouraged." This could mean that someone could legally ride a horse on this trail, or ride an ebike, or even a moto...
2 ~ 1 year agoastotes
♦2
Quoted from the OSM US Trail Stewardship Initiative Wiki page. For tagging: "A social trail, and access to this social trail is not prohibited outright, but is officially discouraged by the land owner/manager.
(as evidenced by posted signs or markings, or by text on e.g. the official website o...
163788893
by EB50
@ 2025-03-18 19:10
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agotekim
♦697
Hi, thanks for the edits! One bit of feedback is that you left the north end of the preserve connector dangling, i.e., not connected to anything. I have fixed that. Also, the south end of the private part of the preserve connector is dangling as well, and I will fix that.
2 ~ 1 year agotekim
♦697
Also, on the private part of the Preserve Connector, you tagged it as access=private, bicycle=designated, foot=designated. Some data consumers would interpret this to mean that that all access is private except bicycle and foot which are "designated", which I don't think is what you ...
3 ~ 1 year agoEB50 Thank you for the fixes! If other trails have been rerouted like this, how do you fix a dangling way?
4 ~ 1 year agotekim
♦697
It depends on what the on the ground situation is that we are trying to depict.

I am assuming, based upon your use of access=private, that while the general public is no longer legally allowed to use the trail, there are some people that are, e.g. members of a private country club, a resident o...
5 ~ 1 year agoEB50 Awesome, will keep that in mind moving forward! Thanks for all the information!!