| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138830333 by Firefishy @ 2023-07-21 20:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgrowshop tagging fit for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11060578312/history ? |
| 2 | ~ 7 days ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5163160 | |
| 176019157 by Firefishy @ 2025-12-16 18:40 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Harry Wood ♦105 | gah! you beat me to it fixing this note about HSBC! https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2675194 :-) |
| 145968861 by Firefishy @ 2024-01-06 19:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | LordGarySugar ♦181 | disabled=yes seems like a strange way to tag a nonexistant railway halt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1214318902)? Maybe historic:railway=halt? (if it should even be on OSM). Likewise the railway marked as abandoned despite no trace on aerial imagery? |
| 174928843 by Firefishy @ 2025-11-21 00:15 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Wynndale ♦58 | Why did you remove the fax number from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376766484? |
| 459224 by Firefishy @ 2009-02-14 18:47 ~ 17 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | VictorIE ♦1,019 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/345476678Could you look at this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4773421 Is there a very modest bridge? |
| 66287417 by Firefishy @ 2019-01-14 00:07 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/663042863/history (version 1, one of four objects). What is the mean of the tag reipppp = 3 ? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | Firefishy | REIPPP stands for the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme. 3 is 3rd phase of purchases. | |
| 154241188 by Firefishy @ 2024-07-22 01:02 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | VictorIE ♦1,019 | Hi,I'm wondering if this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243463024 continues here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389965645Do you have any idea what it carries? Might it be a branch of the "New Multi-Product Pipeline"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17537279 |
| 141486905 by Firefishy @ 2023-09-19 21:35 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | Peter Newman ♦35 | I've added a second booth given there are actually a pair there.Can you remember where the ref on the booth is in terms of which one is which?I wonder if the ref field would be a better bet for tagging them?:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref |
| 131360404 by Firefishy @ 2023-01-17 04:06 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | VictorIE ♦1,019 | Hi,You had a fixme here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7087258579/historyThis appears to be a diamond crossover. railway=railway_crossing |
| 137196306 by Firefishy @ 2023-06-11 09:10 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10968794453/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | https://blitzsecuritygroup.co.uk/ is 404ing so maybe it is simply gone? | |
| 133834581 by Firefishy @ 2023-03-18 18:50 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | What you meant by fixme:type=damp proofing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10743760466/history ? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | Firefishy | What shop key value would fit for a shop that is advertising damp proofing services. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | I edited to craft=damp_proofing_services (there was craft=damp proofing which was also rather rare ATYL tag, but in more unusual form)feel free to edit.revert if you disagree at all | |
| 159408723 by Firefishy @ 2024-11-21 12:54 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | CurlingMan13 ♦2,085 | Reviewed as a periodic review. Good edit. Keep up the great contributions. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159408723 |
| 159407953 by Firefishy @ 2024-11-21 12:32 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | CurlingMan13 ♦2,085 | Reviewed as a periodic review. Good edit. Keep up the great contributions. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159407953 |
| 155846905 by Firefishy @ 2024-08-27 18:44 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | TriStuffMiniFriend ♦2 | How do we know this is spam? Perhaps the description provided is spam, but if the business is really in these places, the business and address is valuable information for end users. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Firefishy | The same IP was used for creating 100s of accounts with just spam profiles. | |
| 102154025 by Firefishy @ 2021-04-02 02:18 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51326106/history has 1=2 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | if it is passenger_lines - is it safe to assume for other similar tags on other railway lines you added? | |
| 84948517 by Firefishy @ 2020-05-09 19:03 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636967920/history has 1=2 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Firefishy | passenger_lines=2 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | Changed, though then I wonder why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802008367 has passenger_lines=1 | |
| 141445146 by Firefishy @ 2023-09-18 23:45 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Firefishy | Removed by informal request from NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | mrpulley ♦239 | Partial reversion done, as per discussion on talk-au mailing list. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147406352 | |
| 143965709 by Firefishy @ 2023-11-13 11:11 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | philippec ♦751 | Berchem Station AEDThe station closes during the night, so access = yes is a mistake. |
| 143872381 by Firefishy @ 2023-11-10 17:06 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | philippec ♦751 | Antwerp SOTM AEDOK, you were four minutes before us.But I asked Simon Poole the developer of Vespucci the honour of him mapping this one together with me.So allow me to delete yours. |
| 141658700 by Firefishy @ 2023-09-23 19:32 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | sirorezka ♦74 | Oh, thx, there is a note about adding organ to the map. You may consider closing it. |
| 141258290 by Firefishy @ 2023-09-14 13:32 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | danieldegroot2 ♦705 | Hey Grant,I sent you a private message a week ago. Could you give me a quick reply, if possible?Happy surveying :-)Regards,Daniel |
| 138357650 by Firefishy @ 2023-07-11 01:04 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,513 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11038357159shop=shisha ? Is it selling shisha equipment? Then maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhookah would work? Or is it a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhookah_lounge ? Or is it something else? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Firefishy | Updated. Thanks. | |
| 126754113 by Firefishy @ 2022-09-28 19:59 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Kai Johnson ♦171 | Some time back in changeset 102871214, you added an lgbt_friendly=no tag to this pub, now changed to lgbtq=no. The guidance on the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq) suggests not to use tags of this type. Was there a verifiable source you used to determine that this tag was approp... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Firefishy | Good call: I have removed the tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139319954This used to be our after work local around 2016 until the owner became very unfriendly to some of our team. Cannot be directly verified.Recently a new generation is taking over the pub (for the better): ht... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Kai Johnson ♦171 | Ah. I'm sorry to hear that happened. Thanks for correcting the tag. Let's hope that the pub is now friendlier to everyone, especially since it seems to have a good selection of ales! Cheers! | |
| 126900485 by Firefishy @ 2022-10-02 16:10 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Robert Whittaker ♦301 | In this changeset, you added "Poundland" brand tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/420783189 but left the name as "99p Stores".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99p_Stores suggests after Poundland bought the chain they changed the branding to "Poundland". Do you ... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Firefishy | I think it is now a Poundland, no longer named 99p Store. Likely best to change or add a fixme tag and I'll check on my next visit. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Robert Whittaker ♦301 | Thanks - I've added a "fixme". | |
| 116548521 by Firefishy @ 2022-01-24 16:40 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦359 | You seem to have not quite finished here and left quite a few untagged ways. Any chance you can add some suitable tags to them? |
| 129186753 by Firefishy @ 2022-11-21 09:11 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | RedAuburn ♦227 | just fyi, shop=coffee is for a retail shop where you buy packets of coffee, not a 'coffee shop' fixed now :) |
| 121775287 by Firefishy @ 2022-05-31 16:02 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Hannah Piggen ♦9 | Hi Firefishy,may you as an admin please lead the way regarding https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Firefishy | Noted. | |
| 121266901 by Firefishy @ 2022-05-21 04:31 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Firefishy | Whoops! This also includes adding road surface details for a major portion of Southern Africa. |
| 117402069 by Firefishy @ 2022-02-14 17:04 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027671642. I assume a copy&paste error. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Firefishy | Wow, good spot. Fixed. Thanks. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Feel free to have a look on https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm from user mueschel. | |
| 104521249 by Firefishy @ 2021-05-11 15:27 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,682 | Hello,I'm currently trying to repair the road merge problems described at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html . Unfortunately as part of that I've removed the name:etymology:wikidata links. I'd imagine that the tidy-up will be complete in about a... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,682 | OK - these are all done now. Where I've reverted back to a version without name:etymology:wikidata I've re-added that tag. 3 changesets from 107746633 onwards. | |
| 73083964 by Firefishy @ 2019-08-06 20:31 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | will morris ♦1 | traffic circle no longer exists. is now an intersection with traffic lights. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Firefishy | Eek! Aerial imagery + note said otherwise. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | Firefishy | Hopefully it is now better!Sorry. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | will morris ♦1 | thanks very much! | |
| 66277871 by Firefishy @ 2019-01-13 16:08 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦6,918 | Hi,you used the key "reipppp" several times on photovoltaic installations. Looks like a mistake, could you have a look?Jan |
| 66053275 by Firefishy @ 2019-01-05 17:45 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦6,918 | Hi,the key "maxspeed:authorised_vehicles" is not used in other places. I would opt for a common "conditional" tag likemaxspeed:conditional = 250 @ "authorized vehicles only"Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Firefishy | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66270554 | |
| 64175095 by Firefishy @ 2018-11-04 18:58 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | GerdP ♦2,819 | Hi again!The tag highway=historical is only used here. I'd suggest to use historic=bridgeand maybe remove the bridge=yes tag. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | GerdP ♦2,819 | I would also not use a key like artefacts.co.za to point to a web link.I think website is used for this, or maybe just note. | |
| 48255996 by Firefishy @ 2017-04-29 13:18 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | hadw ♦80 | What is the source for the footpath from the Conway Gardens footbridge to Proyer's path? It is completely invisible on the ground, except for a PROW sign at the Conway Gardens side of the bridge, which doesn't show the route. As such it seems to fail the "on the ground" test to... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | hadw ♦80 | Again, what is the source for this footpath. It is not visible on the ground (so would need trail_visibility setting). The PROW is only signed on the far side of the railway bridge and not at all at the Proyer's Path end. I'm not aware that Brent have released their definitive map. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Firefishy | I have walked the route many times. It is route that the majority of people who walk to/from the bridge use and it outside of the common pitch area. Yes, the western side before the paved path can be boggy in winter or after heavy rain. | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | hadw ♦80 | The key point is that there is nothing on the ground (although just recently, some grass has been left long at the edges, and you can see the trampling, near the bridge). Also, the chances are that the path doesn't match the historic right of way.However, in my experience, the most common ... | |
| 52497219 by Firefishy @ 2017-09-30 00:39 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | hadw ♦80 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528905704 is transient. It doesn't exist now because it is cricket season, and there is a cricket pitch there. It doesn't exist in the current Bing imagery, but that has about five pitches nearby that are not mapped.I suspect if I checked carefully t... |
| 239066 by Firefishy @ 2007-08-20 21:30 ~ 18 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | MKnight ♦911 | can you say something about the square: w5113614? |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | Firefishy | This was improving the coastline of the area. As you can see I made these changes over 10 years ago... I made this change before OpenStreetMap had changesets or edit comments. ;-) | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | MKnight ♦911 | Have you took a look at this way? -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5113614 i cannot see any improvement there. Thought, it was an mistake. Thats why i am asking. | |
| 21213926 by Firefishy @ 2014-03-20 17:34 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Kelerei ♦14 | Best changeset ever. |
| 39053678 by Firefishy @ 2016-05-02 21:36 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | hadw ♦80 | I don't believe there is a hairdresser's here called Vacant Shop; I think I would have noticed the name if there was. This looks like misusing the name as meta-data.There are at least two ways of indicating void shops; one is shop=vacant, but there is also a lifecycle prefix way of do... |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | Firefishy | Yup sorry, I was testing a mobile app. The shop is vacant and is no longer a hair dresses. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 years ago | hadw ♦80 | I would still say that it should not be called Vacant Shop; it should be un-named. | |
| 1081164 by Firefishy @ 2009-05-04 23:25 ~ 16 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | Vaxe ♦3 | Honeybun community? Cute, but what's the explanation for this? |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | Firefishy | It is called Honeybun Estate.I don't know why it is called that. See here: http://honeybuntra.weebly.com/ or many other search results. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 years ago | Firefishy | With the Honeybun Tenants and Residents Association: http://www.hftra-harrow.org.uk/associations/tenants-and-residents-association/honeybun-tra/ | |
| 4 | ~ 9 years ago | Firefishy | Google Books says built in 1920s: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1i-TAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Honeybun%22+Harrow&dq=%22Honeybun%22+Harrow&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y | |
| 33405202 by Firefishy @ 2015-08-18 00:19 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | hadw ♦80 | There are actually some more paths. There are exits onto both roads at the SW corner,s so a fork there. Also the path at the southern tip continues straight on to join the circular part about halfway round, as well as forking to cross towards Arc House.There is also a path around the NE face o... |
| 29558286 by Firefishy @ 2015-03-18 09:02 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | hadw ♦80 | Arc House is rectangular, and significantly elongated and I wouldn't classify it as "commercial", although refining the full nature probably awaits its opening. My provisional guess is that it is an open air theatre. |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | Firefishy | I'm surprised it has taken so long to open. I've seen the council showing prospective leasers? around. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | hadw ♦80 | The sign says operated by Harrow College, and also says: events, dance, music, cafe, open daily, but it wasn't open around 14:30 today. |