| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168086996 by Gazer75 @ 2025-06-25 10:07 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Jan Olieslagers ♦209 | Is the aerodome completely closed? According to en:wikipedia, Avinor closed it to commercial aviation, but recreational use remains possible. Local confirmation welcome! |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Gazer75 | Seems it is still in use. I didn't do my research properly. Apparently even the airforce is using it for practice still. I'll add back the aerodrome tag, but leave it off for the old terminal building as there is no public service. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | Jan Olieslagers ♦209 | Thanks! I tweaked some minor parameters. | |
| 166504911 by Gazer75 @ 2025-05-20 04:57 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | gormur ♦126 | Men det er vel bare ét av løpene som skal bygges nå i første byggetrinn?https://www.vegvesen.no/vegprosjekter/europaveg/e134vagsliseljestad/ |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Gazer75 | Var ikkje tydeleg kva løp i så fall. Alle planar visar to. Blir uansett oppdatert når anlegget dukkar opp i NVDB. | |
| 122128881 by Gazer75 @ 2022-06-08 17:45 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ZLima12 ♦289 | Hello,I am looking at the following two ways:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31722444https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176299267In this changeset, it looks like you added the tag `toll:backward=||designated`. What did you mean by this? I would have just changed it to `toll:lanes:backw... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Gazer75 | Thanks for pointing this out, I've fixed the tags now. Not sure what happened here as its been years. Might have been some copy/paste mistake at one point. The toll point changed direction back in 2020 as well, so may have been something there. | |
| 123631943 by Gazer75 @ 2022-07-15 03:57 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | drnoble ♦52 | Hi, these cables are marked as 33kV, but this article [1] states they are 66kV. Curious if you have a better source, or if they should be changed?Cheers, Donald[1] https://www.offshore-mag.com/field-development/article/14071989/jdr-adapting-power-cables-for-hywind-tampen-floating-wind-farm |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Gazer75 | Most articles quotes 33kV that I could find. Maybe that is just the internal cabling while the cables to the platforms are at 66kV. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | drnoble ♦52 | Cheers, looked into this a bit more and perhaps they were planing 33kV, as this is on some pages as you say, but changed to 66kV during hte design phase. The Equinor page also states 66kV, so I've updated it.https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-tampen | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Gazer75 | It is most likely 33k internally and then transformed to 66kV for the cables to the platforms. No wind farm I know use more than 33kV from each turbine due to size of equipment. The generators are often 690V and then a transformer at the base ups this to 33kV. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | drnoble ♦52 | The Guide to a Floating Offshore Wind Farm states "Array cables are typically rated at 66 kV. In the next few years, array cable voltages are expected to increase to 132 kV."https://guidetofloatingoffshorewind.com/guide/b-balance-of-plant/b-1-cables/b-1-1-array-cable/ | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | Gazer75 | Cable rating and actual operating voltage is not the same. I believe they landed on 33kV to avoid having to do heavy modifications on the platforms. Space is already limited for power handling. It seems they landed on JDR Cable Systems to provide these 66kV cables. They are designed to break if ther... | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | Gazer75 | Only way to know for sure is to contact Equinor directly, but I'm not sure they would respond to such a question. | |
| 137466895 by Gazer75 @ 2023-06-18 05:47 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Gazer75 | Hit enter to early on accident.Description should read "Fagrafjell substation now completed and energized." |
| 125473319 by Gazer75 @ 2022-08-28 11:23 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | PierZen ♦284 | L'Imagerie ne permet pas encore de confirmer la connexion de la station Romaine-4 avec la ligne Montagnais. Quelle source vous permet de déduire ce schéma de connexion ? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Gazer75 | Ezri imagery shows it nearly complete. Hydro Quebec states construction was completed in 2019 and Romaine 4 is scheduled to begin production in 2022. | |
| 121745893 by Gazer75 @ 2022-05-31 04:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Hannah Piggen ♦9 | In 9 days ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121302444 ) you haven't found time to inform the user? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Gazer75 | Posted a comment on one of the changesets. | |
| 119539259 by Gazer75 @ 2022-04-10 14:59 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Gazer75 | Big bounding box due to long power lines modified. |
| 115293853 by Gazer75 @ 2021-12-23 11:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | Removed a 166km long duplicate 400kV line north of Karlstad causing the large changeset area. |
| 113392283 by Gazer75 @ 2021-11-05 03:33 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | harahu ♦51 | What is the thinking behind this reversion? The reason I modified this junction in the first place was because JOSM complained about power line noes that weren't towers. I agree with JOSM: I don't see it as likely that these power lines are connected in mid air, as opposed to a connect... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | Lines can have a mid air tap where one crosses over the other. there is no connection like you did. Problem is it is impossible to know for the validator if there should be a tower at a node or not, so you can't remove it. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | Hard to find visual examples of this, but here is one close to a streetview: https://goo.gl/maps/cXHLkhVzvFfwpy4V8 | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | Mid air taps are quite common in those types of junctions actually. The tower on the through line is an anchor termination tower with no connection of the line, so it has to go via the two branch ones to the nearby substation. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | Was thinking I would start counting, but if I include 22kV distribution lines then there are probably thousands of taps around the country.Some examples on openinframap:4 taps on this one for the 132kV lines: https://openinframap.org/#17.9/59.276012/9.5436133 taps here: https://openinframap.or... | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | harahu ♦51 | I learnt something new today! Thank you for this thorough and high quality feedback.To me, it seems like it would be natural to have a tag for this; something like `power=tap`. There is no similar tag, as far as I can see. Having one would at least help remove a false positive warning in this ca... | |
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | I fully agree we should have a tag for these to help with validation. I'm not that good with formulating things and don't have enough wiki knowledge to add a proposal. | |
| 8 | ~ 4 years ago | harahu ♦51 | I've been digging around and found this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Apower%3DconnectionIt only has status: proposed, but seems fairly uncontroversial, and seems like an exact match for what we're after.I tagged the nodes as suggested in the wiki in this changeset: htt... | |
| 9 | ~ 4 years ago | harahu ♦51 | It doesn't resolve the JOSM warnings, but at least it is a statement that the mapping is as intended, and perhaps the warnings will be resolved this way in future updates. | |
| 10 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | Nice find!Could probably make a ticket for JOSM asking to add this to validator. It is very much needed.Taginfo shows 2378 uses so far as well, so its not that rare. | |
| 11 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21566 | |
| 12 | ~ 4 years ago | harahu ♦51 | Thanks! Might want to specify in the ticket that we specifically would like the "Missing power tower/pole within power line" warning to go away when two distinct lines are connected using `power=connection`. They might also want to reword the error message for connected lines without said ... | |
| 63717159 by Gazer75 @ 2018-10-21 00:57 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Leonard Ehrenfried ♦17 | Are the woods near Bergen city centre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4824384) really this square? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | The N50 data is made up of areas. Someone destroyed the wood relation south of it so it looks weird. I'll fix that. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Leonard Ehrenfried ♦17 | Thanks a lot! | |
| 109931435 by Gazer75 @ 2021-08-19 12:15 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Kokosnøtt ♦6 | The stretch of road (Borgavegen) between Hegglandsdalsvegen and Nordmarka is now wider after a road reconstruction that was completed in the winter of 2021. This part of Borgavegen has never been steep at all. Would this part have "tertiary standard" or must the whole road between Hjelle a... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 | Tertiary is not really set in stone for Norway so some put it on a lot of roads.Use of tertiary might encourage more through traffic on roads depending on the router used for the app or website.I believe some routers actually ignore tertiary due to the variation in use cases.I've become m... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Kokosnøtt ♦6 | Borgavegen didn't get a separate foot- and cycleway. I think you have better experience when it comes to road classification since you have been editing on osm for longer than me. | |
| 65915278 by Gazer75 @ 2018-12-31 15:22 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Mike Raust ♦81 | Have you checked for consistency or just retagged without manual oversight?If an area was tagged as power=generator this fix introduced new errors. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Gazer75 | Just fixed the errors of mixing generator and plant in same object. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Gazer75 | It's a long time ago so not sure if I went to wikipedia or some other sites to verify, but I do that often to make sure. I never just grab a bunch of elements and retag them. | |
| 88351518 by Gazer75 @ 2020-07-22 13:13 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | gormur ♦126 | Norge i bilder er feil... Bommen ble flyttet en rundkjøring nordover før tunnelen åpnet...https://www.aftenbladet.no/lokalt/i/qLd1GE/bomstasjon-pa-motorveien-er-flyttetOgså observert i terreng. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Gazer75 | Ahh, ja ser det holet i bomringen om den står der :)Brukte bilder og NVDB og rekna med det var rett. | |
| 77925879 by Gazer75 @ 2019-12-04 10:05 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | dgitto ♦934 | what isVERTIKALUT=*? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Gazer75 | Oops! Didn't change the key on this segment after conflating tower heights. Thank you for pointing that out. The key is from the Norwegian SOSI standard. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | dgitto ♦934 | Enjoy | |
| 71290135 by Gazer75 @ 2019-06-15 23:04 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,018 | Hi,what does the key "fee:duration" mean? This is not used in any other place.ThanksJan |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Gazer75 | Tagging of toll points lack a lot of good documentation on wiki unfortunately. We had to basically pick something that works. Many toll projects have a one hour grace period. If you pass the same or other toll point in the same group you do not pay again. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | Gazer75 | The tag might be removed as the system is complicated in some areas like Oslo with two groups (inner and outer rings) and Trondheim with 7 toll groups. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,018 | That's an interesting feature. I also don't see any established scheme to tag this. What confused me was the fact that "duration" is usually how long something takes, so it looked like a fee per hour to me. | |
| 61728864 by Gazer75 @ 2018-08-16 22:17 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Er dette fortsatt en Best? Kan ikke se den i Best sine data. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Gazer75 | Kan vere nedlagt eller bytta til eit anna selskap | |
| 64147325 by Gazer75 @ 2018-11-03 18:07 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Gazer75 | Description should be: Updated Lysebotn and Tjodan hydro plants. Update Lysebotn substation and some 132kV lines |
| 54530746 by Gazer75 @ 2017-12-11 06:21 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | InfosReseaux ♦167 | HiThank you to add all those hydropower featuresYou may be interested by usage=headrace for low pressure waterways upstream of power plant. usage=penstock is only suitable for inclined pipes leading to tubine at high pressure.Consider using waterway=pressurised on penstock and maybe on headrac... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Gazer75 | I had a hard time finding appropriate tags when I mapped this. The wiki is kind of messy when it comes to hydro power and all its components. I didn't map many of these tunnels for the plants as the data is very basic. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | InfosReseaux ♦167 | I believe you that last December the wiki might have look messy.A proposal regarding hydropower was approved last March.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_suppliesYou should have a look to it, I'm sure it will help you. | |
| 61908133 by Gazer75 @ 2018-08-23 04:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,018 | Hi,could you please check this node? It got several foreign tags, which don't seem to belong to OSM:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5850562108Jan |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Gazer75 | Thanks for spotting that one. Somehow a duplicated node got left behind and JOSM validator never warned me. | |
| 59019667 by Gazer75 @ 2018-05-16 14:11 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,018 | Hi,could you check this node, it has many strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5622276584Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Gazer75 | Oops, looks like one of the nodes I had to import from the aviation obstacle data didn't get retagged properly :) Thanks for spotting that. Fixed now. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Gazer75 | How did you spot this error? | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,018 | Using Taginfo I generate a list of keys which newly appear in the database - in most cases it's reporting simple spelling mistakes.http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm |