43 changesets created by Geogast have been discussed with 19 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
165693279
by Geogast
@ 2025-05-01 20:24
12025-05-01 20:25Geogast comentario del changeset: o AeroGRU já não está em fase de construção, empora falte ainda para a inauguração oficial
38539175
by Geogast
@ 2016-04-13 21:20
12024-10-22 22:11dieterdreist
♦836
danke fürs taggen des loc_name! Ich habe gerade zufällig den Bahnhof angesehen. Was hieltest du von loc_name=Zoo und short_name=Bahnhof Zoo? Das eröffnete natürlich Verwechslungspotenzial mit dem Zoo-Zoo, aber im Alltagsgebrauch ist das ja auch so.
156152746
by Geogast
@ 2024-09-03 17:25
12024-09-04 15:36silversurfer83
♦3,379
Gude :)

ist das vielleicht eher ein hw=service?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice

cheers
silversurfer83
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156152746
22024-09-04 19:15Geogast ja, kann auch sein
148140533
by Geogast
@ 2024-03-02 17:35
12024-03-07 01:44MxxCon
♦3,358
Hello.
Should this be the building's name? This sounds more like a description of it rather than a proper name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148140533
145406992
by Geogast
@ 2023-12-22 13:33
12024-02-15 17:22pantufla
♦282
Hey. It's interesting that you added this POI:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11443446885

What is it about?
Can you hire a boat for getting to different points?
22024-02-16 16:25Geogast Yes, exactly. In a taxi kind of way, not (only) touristic kind of way.
32024-02-19 09:35pantufla
♦282
OK. Cool. This seems to be the closest match. If you have photos of the context it'd be cool if you could donate those to the wiki to have different world examples. Thank you! Obrigado.
147149316
by Geogast
@ 2024-02-06 19:50
12024-02-06 19:51Geogast só os túneis têm as mãos separadas
141472822
by Geogast
@ 2023-09-19 14:43
12023-09-20 02:30MxxCon
♦3,358
Hello.
Does it need to be tunnel:wikidata= and not just wikidata=?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141472822
22023-09-20 13:44Geogast That is the tagging scheme proposed for OpenRailwayMap (bridge:wikidata=* and tunnel:wikidata=*) because the wikidata tag is for the railway line (North East Corridor e.g.).
Not in this case, but that was the reason. I think it is more consistent this way.

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi...
138382865
by Geogast
@ 2023-07-11 14:14
12023-07-13 17:01MxxCon
♦3,358
Hello.
Could you please explain why did you change this brand's wikidata article?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138382865
22023-07-13 17:57Geogast Hi! I didn't change the brand:wikidata Tag – I added it. Then you changed it.
As a matter of fact, I think it's better to link to Lego Store, not to Lego, because it is more precise. After all, it is a Lego Store, not Lego itself.
32023-07-13 18:10MxxCon
♦3,358
It would probably be best to update https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=shop&v=toys&tt=lego#lego-80bf0f since that's what prompts to update brand wikidata articles in iD editor.
133981520
by Geogast
@ 2023-03-22 14:38
12023-03-22 14:39Geogast correct commentary: fotos (Wikimedia Commons)
3800184
by Geogast
@ 2010-02-05 19:52
12023-01-10 04:06Pipefitter
♦2
The church is now called New Hope Church non-denominational
22023-01-10 21:50Geogast Hello Pipefitter! And welcome to OSM! Which church? Where is it? With your account, you can change the denomination tag yourself! Feel free to do that! Or I can help you if you want me to. Greetings, Geogast
128694870
by Geogast
@ 2022-11-09 16:19
12022-11-09 23:28muralito
♦2,014
Hola. Mira que esta terminal esta activa. De hecho, el unico servicio de pasajeros del pais al dia de hoy es Tacuarembo-Rivera. Va y viene los lunes y viernes con 1 sola frecuencia, o sea 2 por semana. https://www.afe.com.uy/tacuarembo-rivera/

Quizas cuando terminen las obras del Ferrocarril Ce...
22022-11-11 13:57Geogast Hola Muralito!
Bueno saber que haya por lo menos alguito de servicio… aunque sea poco…
Fijate que yo solo adicioné el wikidata tag (porque había creado el elemento de la estación allá en Wikidata).
Fue gunnar1m quien puso "disused:…" hace...
110565524
by Geogast
@ 2021-09-01 12:29
12022-05-14 14:31Geogast revertido aqui: 110565524
111514035
by Geogast
@ 2021-09-21 20:34
12021-09-21 20:35Geogast source=Bing (mit offset)
6260552
by Geogast
@ 2010-11-01 19:40
12021-05-16 04:54lyctkel
♦332
Hi Geogast,
what is the meaning of the description "Yahoo hires Saint Lucia"?
22021-05-19 12:37Geogast OK, 10 years ago… there were no Bing aerial images, but Yahoo images. Some people (including me) thought at that time that it would be a great idea to map the outlines (hires) of the aerial images. I forgot about these things. 20 hours ago, someone else deleted this one.
32021-05-20 04:29lyctkel
♦332
Hi Geogast,
ich muss mich entschuldigen, ich hielt dies für ein Easteregg. Siehe dazu auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=829963#p829963
90759343
by Geogast
@ 2020-09-11 12:45
12020-09-11 12:47Geogast source=Bing;Mapillary
85834415
by Geogast
@ 2020-05-27 12:58
12020-05-27 14:53muralito
♦2,014
Hola. No hay servicio ninguno en Uruguay, salvo la linea de Tacuarmbó a Rivera.. Por eso estaba historic:railway...
22020-06-23 18:07Geogast Sí, es cierto… Deshice mi edición. y cambié a station pq hay varios desvios.
48379119
by Geogast
@ 2017-05-04 00:36
12018-11-26 01:24muralito
♦2,014
Hola. No parece haber un railway=station aqui. ¿Corresponde mapearlo como historico?
64498205
by Geogast
@ 2018-11-14 19:08
12018-11-14 19:10Geogast source=Esri (não Bing)
57746425
by Geogast
@ 2018-04-02 17:23
12018-04-29 23:12LivInTheLookingGlass
♦54
Hi! Thank you for editing in the Marquette area. I really appreciate the help. If you're looking for more to do, there's a tracker for areas in Marquette + Trowbridge that don't have building outlines here: http://tasks2.openstreetmap.us/project/98
54596783
by Geogast
@ 2017-12-13 13:37
12017-12-13 13:57muralito
♦2,014
Hola Geogast.
¿Porque "disused" y no "abandoned"?
No hay forma de que un tren circule por esas vias sin hacer el puente de nuevo...
22017-12-13 19:46Geogast Hola muralito! Admito que fue mapeo a distancia. Me basé en las fotos
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frontera_Brasil-Uruguay.JPG
y
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Puente_Mau%C3%A1_3.jpg
- que ya tienen unos años. Pero ahí se ven rieles.
Y si los hay, es d...
32017-12-14 12:23muralito
♦2,014
Mas alla de lo se vea en la foto, el puente esta declarado como monumento historico, y la estructura corre riesgos, y no soporta el pasaje de un tren, apenas soporta el trafico de camiones que lo estan dañando, y desde hace años se esta hablando de construir un nuevo puente solo carret...
42018-02-05 11:54Geogast en este sentido: "the feature is still in working order, or could be brought back to working order easily" tenés razón. Sin duda, no pondrán en marcha la linea ferroviaria tan pronto. Ahora lo revierto a r=abandoned.
52211714
by Geogast
@ 2017-09-20 13:38
12017-09-22 06:34Harald Hartmann
♦827
Hello Geogast. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126052480 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96097835 you have tagged `Q1075303=Q5377591` instead of some `wikidata`, right? #newkey #typo
22017-09-22 12:03Geogast Danke für den Hinweis! Ist nun gefixt.
50360341
by Geogast
@ 2017-07-17 19:14
12017-07-17 19:17Geogast of course, source is Bing
50360372
by Geogast
@ 2017-07-17 19:15
12017-07-17 19:17Geogast of course, source is Bing
50360387
by Geogast
@ 2017-07-17 19:15
12017-07-17 19:17Geogast of course, source is Bing
50256277
by Geogast
@ 2017-07-13 11:56
12017-07-13 11:57Geogast as construções: source=survey;Bing
46724779
by Geogast
@ 2017-03-09 23:24
12017-03-10 13:23n76
♦60
Is this railway:position tag for the stop position of trains? If so the San Clemente Pier one seems incorrect as the platform is south of the rail crossing the tag has been added to.
22017-03-10 14:05Geogast no, it has nothing to do with stop_position. railway:position=* is a tag for the Milepost Value. It is to identify, for instance: Mile 123.4 on Line XY. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Level_crossings
46560657
by Geogast
@ 2017-03-03 22:27
12017-03-03 22:31Geogast source=Bing
46560695
by Geogast
@ 2017-03-03 22:28
12017-03-03 22:31Geogast source=Bing
8902463
by Geogast
@ 2011-08-02 16:08
12017-02-28 16:54Víctor L
♦70
Las nomenclaturas de los ferrocarriles, tomando como ejemplo el Belgrano es FCGB.
FF.CC. es una abreviatura que se toma para dos palabras separadas que sean plural, por ejemplo:
RRHH: Recursos Humanos.
EEUU: Estados Unidos.
Ferrocarril es una sola palabra (y singular), por lo que es incorrecta e...
22017-03-01 14:18Geogast Ah, bueno saberlo. Y es bueno, que se esté discutiendo esto en el foro, en la discusión nueva
45818911
by Geogast
@ 2017-02-05 01:18
12017-02-05 01:21Geogast source=Mapillary
44870066
by Geogast
@ 2017-01-03 12:30
12017-01-03 12:32Geogast source should be: survey;*Bing*
42927514
by Geogast
@ 2016-10-15 23:31
12016-11-05 06:29naoliv
♦1,783
Geogast, de onde você viu esse service=commuter que você está inserindo nas rotas?
22016-11-05 23:09Geogast service=commuter é tag dos trens suburbanos (pelo menos no OpenRailwayMap). Você pergunta pela documentação do tag? ou de onde eu tenho a infonmação que é um trem urbano?
32016-11-05 23:15naoliv
♦1,783
Da documentação mesmo.
Na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org eu não encontrei nada (nem mesmo na chave https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service) e no taginfo também é relativamente baixo o uso.
Eu percebi o service=commuter porque vi um aviso no JOSM de q...
42016-11-08 12:24Geogast É certo que não está documentado na página do key: service. Nunca dei conta disto.
Na página de tagging do OpenRailwayMap está: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Train_Route
O value neste sentido que é mais usado é se...
25818599
by Geogast
@ 2014-10-02 20:05
12016-10-20 12:39bigbug21
♦147
Danke für die allgemein eingefügten Signale. Das machte die Einarbeitung kürzlich gemachter Beobachtungen deutlich einfacher (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43031010). Nun sind die Signale konkret hinterlegt und sollten ab morgen auf der OpenRailwayMap dargestellt werden.
22016-10-21 01:28Geogast Oh, ein Lob! Freut mich.
Es sieht ja ganz so aus, dass du auf der Innotrans warst(?). Ich war vor 2 Jahren da und hab nebenbei das hier gemappt.
32016-10-21 08:56bigbug21
♦147
In der Tat. Ich habe das Warten vor den Toren dazu genutzt, die weiteren Details aufzunehmen. ;)
41967814
by Geogast
@ 2016-09-06 22:10
12016-09-06 23:23Geogast Tenho q corregir: a fonte nao foi Bing. O vi eu mesmo no local.
40898209
by Geogast
@ 2016-07-20 14:59
12016-07-20 15:06Geogast source=public domain image
40898269
by Geogast
@ 2016-07-20 15:01
12016-07-20 15:06Geogast source=public domain image
15689736
by Geogast
@ 2013-04-11 13:16
12016-05-26 03:35muralito
♦2,014
Avisame cuando vengan asi voy a recibirlos...
39151667
by Geogast
@ 2016-05-06 20:32
12016-05-06 20:34Geogast mit Hilfe von Mapillary
35450024
by Geogast
@ 2015-11-19 23:44
12015-11-19 23:52Geogast Falscher CS-Kommentar und falscher source.
Richtig: gemappt wurde Eisenbahn-Kilometrierung mithilfe von „NRW-Atlas: Digitale GrundKarte 1:5000“
34454838
by Geogast
@ 2015-10-05 19:27
12015-10-06 06:47flohoff
♦2,352
Hi,
ich habe gesehen das du in OWL jede menge Bahnhöfe angefasst hast. Hier hast du als category "7" gesetzt die es laut Wiki gar nicht gibt:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahnhofskategorie

Wenn das so richtig ist wäre es super wenn du das Wiki anpassen würdest.

Un...
22015-10-06 06:50flohoff
♦2,352
Ah - entschuldige - in dem Wiki artikel fehlt die Kategorie in der Tabelle oben - in der Beschreibung unten findet sich was.
32015-10-09 13:37Geogast Hallo! Die Erlaubnis findet sich hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Kommunikation/DBSuSAG
VG!
42015-10-09 13:37Geogast Eines der wenigen Punkte, wo die DB mal Daten freigibt...
34457526
by Geogast
@ 2015-10-05 21:33
12015-10-05 21:34Geogast correct source: http://www.deutschebahn.com/file/de/2201914/NrI-UHqK9fKym_RWugjkm5znKvg/8136558/data/bahnhofskategorieliste_2015.pdf
26240311
by Geogast
@ 2014-10-21 18:45
12014-11-27 20:53muralito
♦2,014
Creo que este cambio no es adecuado. La estacion actuales la que esta al norte. Esto cerró en 2003 y es desde entonces contruccion abandonada.
26566169
by Geogast
@ 2014-11-05 08:44
12014-11-06 20:19SomeoneElse
♦13,358
Does adding "railway=museum" to every railway museum communicate something that perhaps "railway=museum" fails to? If so, I'm missing what it is :-)
22014-11-06 20:21SomeoneElse
♦13,358
(or, if I can get it the right way around) "... that museum=railway fails to"?
32014-11-06 20:56chillly
♦819
This looks like a global mechanical edit. Was it discussed?

I think it should be reverted and both worthless and undiscussed.
42014-11-08 09:37Geogast Nearly all the museums had been tagged with museum=railway by myself. This tag is not documentated nor proposed at all. But the "new" tag railway=museum is part of the openrailwaymap tagging scheme. So I ADDED this tag, I did not delete any tag, not even the ones I had added.
52014-11-08 10:20SomeoneElse
♦13,358
Where was the "openrailwaymap" tagging scheme proposd and discussed? Tags added for "openrailwaymap" will end up in everyone else's data too. Also, I'm not convinced that "railway=museum" makes a lot of sense. I'm currenly only a couple of miles from h...
62014-11-08 10:39chillly
♦819
These are not railway features they are museums. If I'm interested in green space features I extract landuse, leisure and sport features. I don't add greenspace=yes to all of those across the world to make my extract slightly easier. I will ask the data working group to revert this changes...
72014-11-08 13:36Nakaner
♦3,142
There are two topics regarding this changeset which can be discussed.

Topic 1 is the "mechanical edit question". From formal point of view, this edit can/should be reverted. It is a mechanical edit because we can doubt that Geogast has visited all museums. Mechanical edits which are no...
82014-11-08 13:38emacsen
♦142
Geogast, as per the mechanical edit policy: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy has this edit been discussed with the community? If not, I'm afraid that it will be subject to reversion. Please let me know if there's a public discussion somewhere (a mailing list archi...
92014-11-08 14:25Nakaner
♦3,142
I have been asked by DWG member Frederik Ramm, who knows me from Karlsruhe pub meeting as railway tagging expert, about my opinion in this case. You can find the first part of my answer two comments above this comment.

This changeset is no pure "mechanical edit". It seems to be done by ...
102014-11-08 14:47emacsen
♦142
Nakaner- on behalf of the DWG I am following up on a complaint about this changeset. As per my previous comment, a few things are obvious:

1. This is clearly a mechanical edit. Otherwise, the user would have had to go through and load up the entire world with their editor, looking for a specific ...
112014-11-08 15:59SomeoneElse
♦13,358
For info I'm currently not seeing any mention of musem here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway

or here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Mappingwochenende_2014_1

or here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Aktiventreffen_2014_2

or via a goo...
122014-11-08 17:37Nakaner
♦3,142
SomeoneElse, look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Railway_museums

132014-11-09 14:18emacsen
♦142
This changeset has been reverted in changeset 26664064.